// MAY CONTAIN ERRORS OR INCONSISTENCIES
{
  "meta": {
    "generated_at": "2026-05-08T01:26:38.994412",
    "years": [
      "2024",
      "2025",
      "2026"
    ],
    "total": 2046,
    "answered": 1891,
    "not_answered": 155,
    "separated": true
  },
  "questions": [
    {
      "id": "B/1",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member of Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/1) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member of Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the proposed payment of a 14th month end of year bonus to the pensioners, the \nprivate and public sector employees, he will state where matters stand. \n\n12",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, even before the electoral campaign and during \nthe campaign, we were warning the nation that the macroeconomic figures were being \nmanipulated by the MSM Government and its allies.  \nThe implementation of the 14th month bonus will have deep impact on the economy and \non public finances because of the disastrous situation we have inherited from the previous \nGovernment.  \nBut never, in our wildest nightmare, did we know the extent that the figures would be \nfalsified. \nIn fact, Madam Speaker, the economic boom that the previous Government boasted has \nbeen nothing but an electoral gimmick, very, very far from the harsh reality that we have \ndiscovered after assuming office.  \nWe will, therefore, have to be extremely prudent to minimise the adverse impact of the \n14th month on the economy. \nAs regards the implementation of the 14th month bonus, I will make an announcement \nonce a policy decision is taken by Cabinet on Friday.  \nI will elaborate more on these issues in a statement to the House on the state of the \neconomy this afternoon, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, next question. \nMr A. Duval: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Does the hon. Prime Minister know that \nthe Minister of Labour has stated recently in an interview that consultations had begun and \nthat he was working closely with the Office of the Attorney General for the preparation of a \nBill? Will he confirm whether this is, in fact, the case? \nThe Prime Minister: I can confirm that, in fact, he has been working with the Attorney \nGeneral. We will have to come with a bill; not as it was previously announced. It will have to \nbe through a bill. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \n\n13 \n \nMr A. Duval: May we know, from the consultations and the preparations that are being \nmade with the Office of the Attorney General for the payment of the 14th month bonus, \nwhether it is being envisaged to cap the payment to a certain income level or if it will be for \nall employees? \nThe Prime Minister: In fact, Madam Speaker, I will make a statement later on on the \nstate of the economy, and I am sure the hon. Member will have a good look at it. This is why \nI said that we will have to be extremely prudent to minimise the adverse effect of the 14th \nmonth on the economy. But after the statement on the economy, I am sure you will come up \nwith new questions. \nMadam Speaker: We have been advised that there are some questions that will be \nreplied by other hon. Ministers. PQ I B/2 will be replied by the hon. Minister of Commerce \nand Consumer Protection. PQ I B/4 will be replied by Dr. the hon. Minister of Agro-Industry, \nFood Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries. \nHon. Fourth Member of Port Louis North and Montagne Longue, Mr A. Duval, your \nnext question! \nMOGAS & DIESEL – PROPOSED PRICE REDUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/2",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 2,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member of Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/2) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the proposed reduction in the price of Mogas and diesel, he will state where matters \nstand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nELECTORAL COLLEGE - SETTING UP - PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF \nMAURITIUS & SPEAKER OF NATIONAL ASSEMBLY ELECTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/3",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 3,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member of Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/3) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the proposed setting up of an electoral college for the election of the President of \n\n14 \n \nthe Republic of Mauritius and the Speaker of the National Assembly, he will state where \nmatters stand.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, after 56 years of independence, it is opportune \nto consider constitutional and electoral reforms to further consolidate our democratic \ninstitutions, especially after how the previous regime has undermined all our institutions. It is \nprecisely to consolidate our democracy that the proposal for the setting up of an Electoral \nCollege for the election of the President of the Republic has been included in the electoral \nmanifesto of the Government. \nMadam Speaker, the Electoral College is a process whereby a group of electors is \nformed to elect a candidate to a particular office. \nThe concept of electoral colleges is not a novel one and is known to several \ndemocracies across the world. For instance, countries such as India and Germany have \nrecourse to electoral colleges to elect their President. In France, the Senate is elected by an \nElectoral College. Each of these countries has its own model of the Electoral College, \nadapted to suit their local context and the specificities of their respective electoral systems. \nMadam Speaker, the establishment of an Electoral College in Mauritius will be an \nintegral part of the reform agenda of my Government and we will have consultations with all \nthe stakeholders. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, may I? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, of course! \nMr A. Duval: Will the Prime Minister agree that he had pledged during the campaign \nto appoint the President of the Republic through an Electoral College and that it will not be a \nsimple nominé of the Prime Minister? I will ask the Prime Minister whether he does not agree \nthat the outgoing President could have remained in office pending the appointment of a new \nPresident through the Electoral College as he himself pledged. \nThe Prime Minister: I do not agree with the hon. Member. We have a new \ngovernment. The President’s term has ended. We gracefully allowed him to stay in his \nposition. He stepped down at the time when he was supposed to step down. So, this is why \n\n15 \n \nwe have to replace the President and the Vice-President until we do the reforms that we have \npledged to do. \nMr A. Duval: Will the Prime Minister not agree that under the Constitution, there is \nalready provision for the outgoing President to remain in office pending the incoming \nPresident, and that because a President’s term is for five years, it will not be under this \nGovernment that a new President will be elected through the Electoral College, as has been \npledged? \nThe Prime Minister: I do not agree with the hon. Member. The President, as I said, \nwanted, decided, and accepted that he has to step down after a new government is elected. \nAnd his term of office has come to an end. So, this is how we proceeded with the \nappointment of the new President and the Vice-President.  \nWe cannot allow things to stay as they are because, you know, this will be an eternal \nargument if that is the case. That is why we followed the procedure, and we have elected a \nnew President as it has always been elected, but we will bring the reforms that we have \npledged to bring. \nMr A. Duval: If I may. \nMadam Speaker: Well, I think the Prime Minister has replied to your question. You \nmay, but do not be argumentative and do not come back again to the same issue. \nMr A. Duval: If I may ask the hon. Prime Minister, given that now the President and \nthe Vice-President are in office, and like I said, the term will expire after this Government’s \nmandate, will he consider, once the Electoral College is set up, asking the President, \ntherefore, to vacate the office until he is appointed anew through that system? \n(Interruptions) \nOtherwise, like I said, he will not be keeping his promise to elect the President under \nhis term, under his mandate, through the Electoral College. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: You are coming back. He has given an answer; you may not agree \nwith the answer, but I think I will not pursue with this question anymore. \n\n16 \n \nRt. Hon. Prime Minister, there was also a part on the Speaker’s choice. Maybe you \nwant to reply on that? \nThe Prime Minister: This is like saying, Madam Speaker, that we should be allowing \nMr Phokeer to stay as Speaker! This is precisely what you are saying when we saw what the \ndifference was! So, this is not acceptable! You must treat the President properly. He has \nstepped down, and a new President has come in his place. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, the hon. Prime Minister will realise that the Speaker \nhas to be elected for constitutional amendment to be brought to the House and voted for the \nPresident to be appointed under the new mechanism. My question is that this could have been \nthe case and this promise could have been kept, but I will not insist. \nThe Prime Minister: That promise will be kept. As I said in my answer at the end, I \ndid say that there will be wide consultations with all stakeholders because we have to look at \nall the aspects of it, and we will keep to what we have said. \nRODRIGUES – GOODS & FUEL SUPPLY – SHIPMENT PROCEDURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/4",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 4,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr Francois)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/4) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the supply of goods \nand fuel to Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the relevant \nauthorities, information as to the procedures established for the shipment thereof, indicating \nthe measures being envisaged in order to avoid any shortage thereof for the end of year \nperiod.",
      "answer": "(Vide reply to PQ I B/17) \nNATIONAL ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS – ELECTORAL REFORMS – \nPARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/5",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 5,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr Francois)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/5) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to electoral reforms for \nthe National Assembly elections, he will state if consideration will be given for the setting up \nof a Parliamentary Committee mandated to make recommendations thereon, in particular, the \n\n17 \n \nintroduction of proportional representation and increasing the number of representatives to \nthree for Constituency No. 21, Rodrigues.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Allow me, Madam Speaker, to state at the very outset that my \nGovernment is committed to a fully comprehensive reform of the current electoral system, \nwhich would be reflective of the will of the population and restore the democratic reputation \nof our country. \nTo this end, consultations will be undertaken with all the stakeholders. The need for the \nsetting up of any relevant committee to look into the constitutional and electoral reform will \nbe looked into during this process. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil, Mr \nBeechook! \nSTATE OF THE ECONOMY – COMPREHENSIVE REPORT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/6",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 6,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/6) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the comprehensive \nreport on the state of the economy currently under preparation, he will state where matters \nstand, indicating if consideration will be given for the tabling thereof in the National \nAssembly.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Member for the question. I will \ncertainly table a copy of the report of the state of the economy after my statement in this \nHouse this very afternoon. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, the hon. Third Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d’Or, Mr \nEtwareea! \nLARCENIES – NORTHERN COASTAL REGIONS – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/7",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 7,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/7) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the recent \nincrease in the number of larcenies in the coastal areas in the North, he will, for the benefit of \n\n18 \n \nthe House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the measures taken and \nbeing envisaged to address same.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Thank you. Madam Speaker, the coastal areas in the north \ncomprise 17 regions which start from Le Goulet and end at Roches Noires. These regions are \nhighly popular among tourists and local residents. \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Police that during the past three years, 1,120 \ncases of larcenies have been reported to the Police in the northern coastal areas, that is, from \n2022 to 2024.  \nI am also informed that the Police have put in place several measures to closely monitor \nthe situation. They are as follows – \n(i) \nbike and mobile patrols are carried out daily by the regular Police, Divisional \nCID, Emergency Response Services, Divisional Support Unit, Police de \nL’Environnement, Police du Tourisme, and the National Coast Guard in the \nresidential and commercial areas as well as the coastal regions for the safety of \nvisitors and business operators; \n(ii) \nthe Special Supporting Unit and Special Mobile Force are deployed at night to \ncarry out mobile patrols and roadblocks in strategic locations throughout the \nisland, including, therefore, the Northern Division;  \n(iii) the Crime Prevention Unit regularly conducts sensitisation campaigns in \nresidential and commercial areas as well as hotels in order to raise public \nawareness on crime prevention measures. Additionally, Neighbourhood Watch \nSchemes have also been set up in those regions in order to enlist the support of \nthe whole community in the fight against crimes, including larcenies, and \n(iv) Safe City Cameras are used to monitor the movements of suspicious persons and \nvehicles for prompt and coordinated response to attend to public requests for \npolice assistance. \nMadam Speaker, following the appointment of the new Commissioner of Police, the \nexisting measures are being reinforced to revitalise the various Units of the Police Force \nisland-wide for a more effective response to crime. \n\n19 \n \nThe Police Force is reorganising its workforce and will adopt a zero-tolerance policy \napproach against all offenders as a deterrent to reoffending.  \nWe place, Madam Speaker, a high premium on the safety and security of visitors and \nlocal residents. We must ensure that our country remains a safe destination, not only for \ntourists but also for local residents. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. We will now be moving to \nQuestions addressed to other hon. Ministers. So, I have to inform you that PQ I B/22 will be \nreplied by the hon. Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade. \nI now call on the hon. Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien, Mr Apollon. \nMV WAKASHIO SHIPWRECK – VICTIMS – COMPENSATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/8",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 8,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries —",
      "question": "(No. B/8) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the compensation payable to the victims of the Wakashio shipwreck, he will state \nwhere matters stand.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, I seek your indulgence. I will give the salient features in \nmy reply and the comprehensive one will be circulated. \nMadam Speaker: I am so sorry. You were replying to the question I B/22? \nDr. Boolell: Yes, I am replying to the question, but what I am saying is that I seek your \nindulgence. I will give the salient features in my reply, and the comprehensive one will be \ncirculated. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! \nDr. Boolell: Thank you very much, Madam Speaker. \nFollowing the grounding of the MV Wakashio on 25 July 2020, a Solidarity Grant was \nput in place to provide financial assistance to all victims. Registered fishers, applicant fishers, \nfishmongers, holders of commercial pleasure craft licence, skippers, and beach hawkers were \nthus each paid only Rs10,200 per month from August 2020 to March 2021, that is, an average \nof Rs80,000 only during the period of 8 months. The sum disbursed was unfortunately \ngrossly inadequate.  \n\n20 \n \nFollowing public outcry and protest march, the Japan P & I Club, the sole organisation \nin Japan underwriting Protection and Indemnity Insurance to both ocean-going vessels and \nJapanese coastal vessels and the insurer of the Cape Size Vessel, agreed, unfortunately, to \npay only USD 2,650,048 as full and final compensation to the 999 registered fishermen, \napplicant fishers, and fishmongers.  \nThough the fishers, the applicant fishers, and fishmongers were entitled to more, they \nwere each only paid Rs113,000 in December 2021 as additional compensation for loss of \nearnings. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that as at date, Government has disbursed \napproximately Rs838 million of taxpayers’ money for various expenses in connection with \nthe shipwreck. It is unacceptable that as of now, only Rs60 million, that is, 7.4% of expenses \nclaimed, has been reimbursed so far by the insurers. \nMadam Speaker, I personally raised the matter with the Japanese Ambassador during a \nmeeting I had with him on 05 December 2024 and registered my official complaint on the \nloss of income suffered by the victims. I impress upon the Ambassador to ask the Japan \nInternational Cooperation Agency to expedite the projects identified to empower the fishers. \nIt is unfortunate that the ship owner Okiyo Maritime Corporation has entered a case \nbefore the Supreme Court to set a limitation fund under the international convention on civil \nliability for bunker oil pollution that is a bunker convention to the sum of approximately \nRs720 million instead of Rs2.3 billion claimed. I hope the Supreme Court will not take long \nto give its ruling. \nIt is unfortunate, Madam Speaker, that none of the former Government Ministers nor \nthe Prime Minister deemed it fit to depone before the Court of Investigation on the MV \nWakashio to look into the grounding, which is the major ecological disaster. It is only now \nthat this pertinent case is being given the great seriousness of purpose. The Attorney General \nand his office are exploring all possible avenues in relation to legal matters. The State of \nMauritius, as plaintiff, will fight for its legitimate rights, and the victim should be entitled to \nall plaintiffs. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \n\n21 \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. The hon. Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine \nMagnien, Mr Apollon! \nELECTRIC CREMATION INCINERATORS – NON-OPERATIONAL & \nREPAIR WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/9",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 9,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government —",
      "question": "(No. B/9) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to electric cremation incinerators, \nhe will state the number thereof installed, indicating the number thereof not in operation and \nfurther indicating where matters stand as to the repairs thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I am informed that there are 32 LPG Fire Human \nIncinerators across Mauritius, out of which 16 are not operational. These 16 incinerators were \nprocured by the Ministry of Local Government in 2018, and the project was funded under an \nIndian line of credit. The contract was awarded on 26 July 2019 for an amount of USD \n2,256,000 inclusive of contingencies. \nMadam Speaker, here I have the duty to inform the House that the out-going \nGovernment failed to ensure that the provision for maintenance in the bidding document and \nthis situation led to the 16 incinerators not functioning and hence causing undue \ninconvenience to our citizens around the country. \nIn order to remedy this situation, bids were invited for the repairs, periodic servicing, \nand maintenance of all these 16 LPG Fire Human Incinerators. Eventually, Steam House \nLimited, which met all requirements, was awarded the contract for the repairs, periodic \nservicing, and maintenance of these 16 LPG Fire Human Incinerators by a contract price of \nRs20,504,000, excluding VAT, on 14 October 2024, for a period of two years, renewable \neach year for an additional period of three years upon satisfactory service. \nMadam Speaker, as at date, the contractor has already surveyed three incinerators, \nnamely at Camp Levieux, Richelieu, and Tombeau, Mahebourg. In order to prevent any \nmalfunctioning of incinerators, Steam House Ltd. intends to set up the incinerators with both \nautomatic and manual options so that the incinerators could be switched to manual mode of \noperation whenever needed.  \nIn the meantime, all requests for incinerations received at the level of different councils \nare being redirected to the nearest cremation incinerators, which are in operation under their \n\n22 \n \nrespective council’s jurisdiction. In case incinerators are not available, the traditional \ncremation grounds are being used.  \nMadam Speaker, as per the contract, the contractor is expected to complete the repairs \nof all these 16 incinerators within a period of 12 months. However, my Ministry is requesting \nthe contractor to proceed faster with the repairs. In fact, I am personally following up on this \nmatter with the officers of my Ministry. Thank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nMr Apollon: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can I ask the hon. Minister to inform the \nHouse which company supplied the 16 incinerators that were funded under the Indian line of \ncredit as stated by the hon. Minister? \nMr Woochit: These 16 incinerators were procured from Kanta Electricals India Ltd. \nMadam Speaker: Next question, then. Hon. Second Member for Mahebourg and \nPlaine Magnien, your third question!  \nFISHERMEN CARDS APPLICATIONS – 2019-DEC 2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/10",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 10,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries —",
      "question": "(No. B/10) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the fishermen cards, he will state the number of applications therefor received since \n2019 to date, indicating the number thereof – \n(a) \nissued, and  \n(b) \nrejected.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, hon. Member.  \nMadam Speaker, from 2019 to date, my Ministry has received 2,257 applications for \nfishermen cards, of which 1,134 fishermen cards have been issued. The list is being tabled. \nMoreover, from 2019 to date, a total of 186 applications for fishermen cards were \nrejected for the following reasons – \n(a) \n48 applicants were aged above 50 years; \n\n23 \n \n(b) \n93 applicants were holders of a Business Registration Number or were in \ngainful employment, and  \n(c) \n45 were involved in drug dealing.  \nMr Apollon: Thank you, Madam Speaker. L’honorable ministre, peut-il nous dire si le \nministère peut revoir les critères pour la distribution des cartes de pêcheur ? Comme on le \nsait, les dix dernières années, cela a été utilisé à des fins politiques. Est-ce qu’on peut revoir \nles paramètres pour assurer que les vrais pêcheurs obtiennent leurs cartes ?  \nDr. Boolell: Certainly, Madam Speaker. I invite the distinguished hon. Member from \nMahebourg and Plaine Magnien to dispense his sound advice to us. We are here to pay heed \nto what he has to say.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr François: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister whether he is \naware that 100 fishermen cards allocated to Rodrigues in the present financial year by his \nMinistry have not been delivered to the Rodriguan fishermen? Will he enquire as to the \nreasons thereof?  \nDr. Boolell: I am glad that the distinguished hon. Member from Rodrigues has made \nme aware! Now that I have been made aware, corrective measures will be taken to redress the \nsituation. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister. Mr Apollon, your fourth question!  \nMAHEBOURG HOSPITAL – MEDICAL SERVICES & FACILITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/11",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 11,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness —",
      "question": "(No. B/11) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Mahebourg Hospital, he \nwill state if consideration will be given for the review and upgrading of the medical services \nand facilities thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, in fact, the answer is in the positive. I am aware that \nthere is a project for the construction of a ground plus three buildings comprising inter alia an \nAccident and Emergency Department, Non-Communicable Diseases Services, a Pharmacy \nDepartment, Laboratory Services, and a Psychotherapy Unit. The project is still at the design \nstage, and I will see to it that the process is activated. \n\n24 \n \nIn the meantime, the services being provided at the existing hospital will be upgraded to \nprovide, in the first instance, a 24/7 hours service for general medicine, cardiac services, \npaediatric, and antenatal care. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nMr Apollon: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can I ask for a humble request from the \nMinister if the ministry can, on a short-term solution, see to the better functioning of the \nMahebourg Hospital as there are more than 100,000 inhabitants that use the services of this \nhospital? \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I can give the assurance to the hon. Member that in the \ndays to come, I will conduct a personal visit to the hospital and try to make efforts to improve \nall the services that are there. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. I do not like to be called ‘Sir,’ I am sorry. \nJust Madam Speaker will be okay!  \nNext question, hon. Fourth Member of Port Louis North and Montagne Longue, Mr A. \nDuval! \nFORTHCOMING MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ELECTIONS – DUE DATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/12",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 12,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member of Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government —",
      "question": "(No. B/12) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the forthcoming \nMunicipal Council Elections, he will state when same will be held.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, the last Municipal City Council and Municipal Town \nCouncil elections were held in June 2015. Accordingly, as per the Local Government Act, the \nlife of all councils should have ended in June 2021.  \nThe previous government repeatedly postponed the Municipal Elections on three \noccasions since June 2021. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Municipal Elections were \npostponed on two occasions for a period of one year each, as from 15 June 2021 and a further \nperiod of one year as from 14 June 2022.  \nHowever, the previous government again postponed the Municipal Elections for a third \ntime to June 2025. This was very irresponsible and against the democratic rights of the \ninhabitants governed by the municipal council concerned. \n\n25 \n \nMadam Speaker, it is an undeniable fact that the previous government was aware that if \never the Municipal Council Elections were to be held, they would have lost all the 120 seats \nin the Municipal Councils. Hence, they came up with an amendment to the Local \nGovernment Act to extend the life of the municipal council by a further period of two years \non the ground that the reform had to be brought to the local government system in Mauritius. \nThe Municipal Council Elections are now due by mid-June 2025.  \nMadam Speaker, unfortunately, one and a half years have elapsed, but no official report \non such reform has been laid on the table of the National Assembly nor has the public been \nmade aware of these reports. Our Government has the commitment to uphold the democracy \nand to ensure that the Municipal Council Elections be held as soon as possible. \nMadam Speaker, we do not believe in piecemeal solutions. Our firm commitment is to \nredress all the wrongdoings of the previous government, to uphold democracy, and to ensure \nthat the local authorities are governed under a proper, modern, and effective legal framework.  \nAccordingly, only a few days after joining the Ministry, we have already started to \nreview and update the Local Government Act and all the regulations that flow from same. \nOur Government and my Ministry give the firm undertaking that we are going to hold the \nMunicipal Council Elections as soon as possible when all the necessary amendments are \nmade to the Local Government Act to reflect the vision of this Government.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister.  \n(Interruptions) \nBe careful, I can hear!  \nThe hon. First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue, Mrs Savabaddy! \nLATE MINOR E.E.J. – ALLEGED MURDER – FAMILY ASSISTANCE & \nSUPPORT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/13",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 13,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare —",
      "question": "(No. B/13) Mrs A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the \nalleged murder of minor E.E.J. on 25 November 2024, she will state the assistance extended, \nif any, by her Ministry to the victim’s family. \n\n26",
      "answer": "Mrs Navarre-Marie: Madam Speaker, I am informed that on 25 November 2024, at \n15:45 hours, one Mrs R.R. reported to the Police that at around 10 hours, on the same day, \nafter having fed her late baby E.E.J. of 18 months old, she found that the latter was not \nreacting. She conveyed the baby to Dr. A.G. Jeetoo Hospital, Port Louis, where Doctor V. \ncertified her death, and the case was referred to the Police Medical Officer for an autopsy.  \n \nThe autopsy was conducted by the Principal Police Medical Officer, where the cause \nof death of late baby E.E.J. was attributed to a subarachnoid haemorrhage. \n \nMrs R.R. confessed to the police that on 25 November 2024, she dealt the baby girl a \nfisticuff blow violently at the head of baby E.E.J. early in the morning. On 26 November \n2024, a provisional charge of murder was lodged against the accused before the District \nCourt of Port Louis. \n \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that prior to the events that led to the \ntragic death of the baby on 17 October 2024, she was admitted to Queen Elizabeth Hospital \nRodrigues for treatment.  \nOn 18 October, the social worker of Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Rodrigues, referred \nthe case to CDU Rodrigues. On 21 October, Mrs R.R. attended the first session with a \npsychologist of CDU Rodrigues. I am informed that a second appointment was scheduled for \n11 November 2024, but she did not attend as she was in Mauritius since 06 November 2024. \n \nMadam Speaker, when the case of the demise of the 18-month-old baby became \nknown to the officers of my Ministry, psychological assistance was proposed to Mr P., the \nmaternal uncle, the only relative living in Mauritius, on 27 November 2024, but he declined.  \n \nI am also informed that no assistance was provided to the mother as she was arrested \nby the police and was and is still in police custody. Given that the family of the late baby \nexpressed their wish to conduct the funeral in Rodrigues, I made necessary arrangements with \nthe relevant authorities for the repatriation of the body on 27 November 2024.  \nWith regard to the father and other relatives residing in Rodrigues, I am further \ninformed that the psychologist posted to CDU Rodrigues contacted them on 27 November \n2024 and 06 December 2024 for psychological assistance, but they declined the same. I wish \nto reassure the House that close follow-up is being maintained in this case for further \nassistance. \n\n27 \n \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that since I took office, I have already \nmet the Commissioner of Police on 05 December 2024, along with different units of my \nMinistry. It was an occasion to review the existing protocol to reinforce the collaboration \nbetween the police and the Ministry with a view to enhancing the protection of children and \nwomen, victims of violence. \nI thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes, hon. Mrs Savabaddy! \nMrs Savabaddy: Madame la présidente, en parlant des cas d’enfants morts dans des \ncirconstances tragiques, je me réfère certainement au cas de la mère qui a avoué avoir battu \nson bébé de 18 mois à mort le 25 novembre dernier. Son ex-compagnon a déclaré dans la \npresse que leur fille âgée de trois ans serait décédée à la suite d’une chute en septembre \ndernier à Rodrigues, mais qu’aucune autopsie n’avait été réalisée. Aujourd’hui, il souhaite \nque la justice soit faite. Est-ce que le ministère accompagne ce monsieur dans ses démarches \n? Merci. \nMrs Navarre-Marie: Thank you for the question. Madam Speaker, I wish to inform \nyou that we were informed that there was a previous child who died in similar circumstances, \nbut an autopsy was carried out on the dead child on 24 September by Dr. Monvoisin, PMO at \nQueen Elizabeth Hospital, and it was found out that the cause of death was natural because \nthe late girl child was an epileptic patient. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: Merci, Madame la présidente. Puis-je demander au ministre concernant \nle rapport d’autopsie qui a déclaré la mort à la cause naturelle, êtes-vous satisfait ou avez-\nvous revu le rapport ? Merci. \nMrs Navarre-Marie: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Frankly speaking, I wish to \ninform the House that I have not taken cognisance of the report personally. If need be, I shall \nlook into that. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Mrs Savabaddy! Next question please! \nRIVALLAND ROAD, CRÈVE COEUR - WATER METER CONNECTIVITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/14",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 14,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities —",
      "question": "(No. B/14) Mrs A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to water meter \nconnectivity to households along Rivalland Road in Crève Coeur, he will, for the benefit of \n\n28 \n \nthe House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to whether they are \nconnected thereto and, if not, the reasons therefor.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the Central Water Authority \ncurrently has a total of 310 subscribers in the region of Rivalland Road, Crève Coeur, who \nare connected to the Central Water Authority's existing pipe network. This region forms part \nof the CWA water supply zone, that is, the north. The region of Rivalland Road in Crève \nCoeur receives potable water from Crève Coeur Service Reservoir, which sources its water \nfrom Malinga Reservoir, Bassin Loulou, and Labourdonnais River. The daily hours of supply \nare between 4 am and 8 am and then 4 pm and 8 pm. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that following complaints from some residents \nof Rivalland Road on social media regarding water supply, the Central Water Authority has \neffected a site visit thereat on 06 November 2024. It was found that 22 households along \nRivalland Road in Crève Coeur were not registered subscribers of the Central Water \nAuthority, and there was no Central Water Authority service main in that particular area. \nThey are situated at a far end of the road and on a higher elevation. \nThe Central Water Authority thus conducted a public relations exercise with the \ninhabitants concerned, who were advised to make an official application for a new water \nsupply at the Central Water Authority sub-office in Pamplemousses in order to be connected \nto the CWA pipe network. I am also informed by the Central Water Authority that no \napplication has been received from the inhabitants concerned to date. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Mrs Savabaddy! \nMrs Savabaddy: L’eau est une matière première précieuse et importante. Sans elle, \nl’être humain ne pourrait pas survivre, mais toutes les eaux ne se valent pas. M. le ministre, il \nfaudrait quand même dire que j’ai été dans la circonscription avec mes deux colistiers, \nl’honorable Ashok Subron et l’honorable Ludovic Caserne. Malheureusement, vos réponses \nne sont pas satisfaisantes. Plusieurs de ces habitants ne sont malheureusement pas raccordés \nau réseau de la CWA. C’est le cas de le dire pour les habitants de Rivalland, Crève Cœur. \nEst-ce que M. le ministre pourrait informer la Chambre des mesures qui seront prises \nrapidement pour que nos citoyens soient raccordés en eau et aient une consommation d’eau \npotable ? Vous avez parlé de 22 familles et nous parlons de 50 familles. Merci. \n\n29 \n \nMr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, je peux comprendre l’irritation de \nl’honorable membre et son impatience ; je peux comprendre. Je ne vais pas me bagarrer avec \nles chiffres entre 22 et 50. Ce que je voudrais ajouter, Madame la présidente, c’est que pour \nêtre connecté au réseau de la CWA, il faudra qu’on ait une application de ces gens-là.  \nDonc, connecting these households would require significant infrastructural work \nincluding l’installation de 500 mètres de new pipelines et upgrading of the existing pump \nsystem to ensure adequate water supply.  \nComme je l’ai dit dans ma réponse initiale, Madame la présidente, il faudra que les 22 \nou 50 familles, comme précisé par l’honorable membre, fassent une demande auprès de la \nCWA, et j’espère, je promets à l’honorable membre que ces 22 familles seront raccordées très \nrapidement. \nMadam Speaker: Your next question because that has been quite … And do not \nshout, please! Le micro est très sensible. \nMrs Savabaddy: I am sorry. I B/15. \nMadam Speaker: Parlez normalement ! Parlez normalement ! \nMrs Savabaddy: I am not used to it, sorry. B/15. \nMadam Speaker: That is all right; that is better. \nCITÉ LA CURE, PAUL & VIRGINIE STREET – WATER METER \nCONNECTIVITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/15",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 15,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities —",
      "question": "(No. B/15) Mrs A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to water meter \nconnectivity to households along Paul and Virginie Street, also known as Ti Rodrigues, in \nCité La Cure, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, \ninformation as to whether they are connected thereto and, if not, the reasons therefor.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Central Water Authority that \nthe Paul and Virginie Street also known as Ti Rodrigues in Cité La Cure falls within the \nCWA water supply zone of Port Louis. The region receives potable water from the Priest’s \nPeak Reservoir supplied by La Nicolière and Pailles water treatment. I am further informed \nthat households located on the right-hand side of Paul and Virginie Street leading to La Cure \n\n30 \n \nReservoir are connected to the water supply network and have individual water meters \ninstalled by the CWA.  \nHowever, the Central Water Authority does not have any pipe network on the left-hand \nside of the road at Ti Rodrigues, as the area is currently occupied by unauthorised settlement \nor un mot que je n’aime pas ‘squatters.’ Madam Speaker, I am informed that an applicant for \na new supply connection has to submit a title deed or authorisation from the landowner to \nenable the Central Water Authority to fix a water meter. I understand that the Central Water \nAuthority will have to undertake necessary infrastructure development and the laying of \napproximately 3 km of pipeline to extend the network to the region concerned. Thank you. \nMrs Savabaddy: Madam Speaker, les conditions dans lesquelles les habitants de Ti \nRodrigues vivent en 2024 sont inimaginables. Nous sommes pour le changement ; nous \nparlons du changement. Est-ce que nous pouvons changer le quotidien, la situation de ses \nhabitants et améliorer leur qualité de vie ? Monsieur le ministre vient tout juste de parler d’un \nréservoir qui sera placé dans la région.  Est-ce que cela peut se faire au plus vite pour le bien-\nêtre des habitants et aussi pour les enfants ? Merci. \nMr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, je comprends encore une fois l’impatience de \nl’honorable membre, mais je dois préciser que new application for water connectivity \nrequires an applicant to provide proof of land ownership such as a title deed or autorisation \nfrom the land owner to install a water meter. Ceci étant dit, je dois préciser que the land dont \non parle ce matin, Madame la présidente, the land occupied by the squatters is found on \nprivate land belonging to various owners. There are about three hundred people/squatters at \nLa Cure known as Ti Rodrigues over an area of 35 arpents. The squatter area, which is \nlocated at the foot of Long Mountain, is rather sloppy, and as such, there might exist several \nnatural storm drains. \nJe voudrais aussi ajouter pour l’honorable membre que any future consideration for \nwater connectivity on the left side of the road will depend on the resolution of the land \noccupation issued which should be dealt with by the Ministry of Housing and Lands. Étant dit \ncela, Madame la présidente, si les papiers voulus, les permissions voulues sont obtenus, au \nsein de la Central Water Authority et au ministère, nous allons faire le nécessaire pour que \nces personnes soient raccordées au réseau de la CWA. Le coût du projet est autour de 25 \nmillions de roupies, duration of work trois à quatre mois si les permis nécessaires sont faits. \nJe vous assure, Madame la présidente, le nécessaire sera fait. \n\n31 \n \nMadam Speaker: Relevant only, please! \nMrs Savabaddy: Last question, thank you. En attendant que ces habitants soient \nrelogés par le ministère du Housing, M. le ministre, est-ce possible que nous allions avec vos \nofficiers sur les deux sites, que ce soit à Crève Cœur ou à Ti Rodrigues pour faire un état des \nlieux ? Sachant que vous avez reçu des réponses des officiers de votre ministère – donc, être \nprésent sur le site et voir la situation de visu et avoir les informations par téléphone – est-ce \npossible que nous puissions aller sur place pour un site visit ? Merci. \nMr Assirvaden: Certainement, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Merci. Mr Edouard, hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues, please. \nYour question! \nRODRIGUES – PETROLEUM PRODUCTS – SUPPLY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/16",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 16,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and) Consumer Protection —",
      "question": "(No. B/16) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nCommerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the supply of petroleum products \nin Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a)  \nif there has been any shortage thereof in the past year, giving details thereon;  \n(b)     the established procedures for the import and retailing thereof, and \n(c)    \nif consideration will be given for the setting up of a centralized system for the \ncoordination and distribution thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Yeung Sik Yuen: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the supply distribution and \nstorage of petroleum products in Rodrigues is presently effected by AEL DDS Ltd. The \naforementioned company procures its petroleum products directly from oil companies in \nMauritius as per its requirements and is responsible for the importation of the same into \nRodrigues. \n \nWith respect to part (a) of the question regarding the shortage of petroleum products \nover the past year, I am informed there has been occasional disruption due to increased \ndemand, logistical challenges, and limited storage capacity; notably, shortages occurred on \nthe following occasion – \n\n32 \n \n(a) \non 30 October 2024, supply was disrupted for a few hours before being restored \nthe following day; \n(b) \non 09 November 2024, supply was interrupted until the arrival of a consignment \non 10 November 2024; \n(c) \non 21 November 2024, sales were halted following half-day shortages until \narrival of new consignment the next morning; \n(d) \non 01 December 2024, a shortage of Gasoil disrupted public transport, which \nresumed normal operations on 02 December 2024 with the arrival of new stock, \nand  \n(e) \non 06 December 2024, supply was again disrupted. \nThese challenges stem from various factors, including logistical constraints such as the \nlimited number of ISOtainers available and the disruption caused by increased bulk \npurchases. \nTo address these issues, we have taken proactive steps, including increasing the \nISOtainer filing capacity, improving stock management, and securing additional ISOtainers, \nwhich are expected to enhance supply reliability by January 2025. Additionally, priority \nmeasures such as dedicating specific filing stations for government, emergency services, and \npublic buses have been implemented to mitigate the impact of shortages on social services. \nMadam Speaker, with respect to part (b) of the other question, as I mentioned earlier, \nAEL DDS Ltd. is presently responsible for the whole supply chain of petroleum products in \nRodrigues, from the importation to the retailing of the products. The company faces \nchallenges such as limited shipping capacity, restricted storage facilities, and rising demand \nfrom the public and Central Electricity Board. \nPetroleum products are transported from Mauritius to Rodrigues in dedicated \nISOtainers, with a recent addition bringing the fleet to 16 units present. I am informed that \nAEL DDS Ltd. owns and operates three petrol service stations at Port Mathurin, Mont-Lubin, \nand Grand La Fouche Corail. Additionally, AEL DDS Ltd. also owns and operates a mobile \ntruck at Baie Lascar Service Station, which is used to replenish vehicles with Gasoil only. \n\n33 \n \n Madam Speaker, with regard to part (c) of the question, all possible avenues to enhance \nthe present provision for the supply, distribution, and retail of petroleum products in \nRodrigues to ensure reliable access to these essential resources are being explored.  \n Madam Speaker, we remain committed to addressing these challenges and ensuring the \nresidents of Rodrigues have stable and secure access to petroleum products. \n Madam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. \n Mrs Henriette-Manan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Minister inform the \nHouse as to whether he is considering in the near future measures such as the expansion of \nthe port on the island to accommodate a higher fuel storage capacity, being given the \nincreasing demand in Rodrigues due to the increase in the number of vehicles? Thank you. \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Madam Speaker, we will definitely take it into consideration \nsubject to the availability of funds. We will have to go to Cabinet to take a decision. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister. Yes, Mr Edouard. \nMr Edouard: There have been discussions between the former Chief Commissioner \nfor Rodrigues and the State Trading Corporation for a storage facility in Rodrigues. Will the \nMinister state if the procurement notice that had been launched in October last will continue \nfor a white oil storage facility in Rodrigues? \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Well, we will take it into consideration. We will discuss it with \nthe STC. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, your next question, please!  \n(Interruptions) \nOh, I am sorry. I did not catch your eye! \nMr François: Alright. \nMadam Speaker: You did not catch my eye. \n\n34 \n \nMr François: Thank you. Will the hon. Minister confirm whether in the past, during \nany shortage of petroleum products in Rodrigues, a small private tanktainer or whatever name \nwe call it, vessels were charted to serve Rodrigues and if the problem persists, will he \ncontemplate the same modalities? \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Well, according to the information that I have, we will need to \nhave more trips to Rodrigues. Once we have more trips to Rodrigues, I believe that the \nproblem will be resolved. \nMr François: That is correct, and is the Minister aware that there is limited \ninfrastructure in the port area? Even if we have additional trips, there is limited space in the \nport area, especially for containers, storage, and others. Is he considering looking with MPA \nand other authorities to extend the storage area in the port area in Rodrigues? \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Madam Speaker, we will definitely work on it. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, your next question, please! \nRODRIGUES – FESTIVE SEASON – GOODS SUPPLY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/17",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 17,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries —",
      "question": "(No. B/17) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nAgro Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to the supply \nof goods during the festive season in Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Mauritius Shipping Corporation Ltd., information as to whether consideration will \nbe given for the increase in the number of trips of the vessel Peros Banhos to Rodrigues \nduring the month of December 2024.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, hon. Member. With your permission, Madam \nSpeaker, I will reply to both Parliamentary Questions I B/4 and I B/17 as they relate to the \nsame subject matter. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that as of now, the Mauritius Shipping Corporation \nLtd. is operating with only one vessel, the Peros Banhos, which takes around 260 containers \nto Rodrigues per trip. For the peak period between October and December for the year 2023, \nthe Mauritius Shipping Corporation Ltd. shipped a total of 2,013 containers. For the same \nperiod this year, the Mauritius Shipping Corporation Ltd. has already shipped 1,512 \n\n35 \n \ncontainers as at 30 November 2024 with 510 containers forecasted to be shipped on the \nremaining two verges in December which will make a total of 2,022 containers. \nMadam Speaker, notwithstanding what my colleague, the Minister of Commerce and \nConsumer Protection, has stated in relation to petroleum products and of course we take \nonboard valuable suggestions made by distinguished honourable members from Rodrigues, \nlet me say that as regards the shipment of petroleum products to Rodrigues, 14 tanktainers \nwere shipped to Rodrigues in the last verge, and it is planned to ship 16 tanktainers on each \nof the next two verges to Rodrigues. With the above shipment of goods and petroleum \nproducts, it is expected that there will not be any shortage thereof in Rodrigues. However, of \ncourse, we have to err on the side of caution, and it is precisely why I am going to inform the \nHouse that the MV Trochetia, which went for dry docking, will come back on 16 December \n2024, and additional trips can be arranged to Rodrigues if ever the need is felt. \nMadam Speaker: Now, I will call the Third Member for Port Louis and Port Louis \nCentral, Dr. Aumeer! \nCOVID-19 PANDEMIC – DIALYSIS PATIENTS’ DEATH – FACT-FINDING \nCOMMITTEE REPORT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/19",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 19,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure —",
      "question": "(No. B/19) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the forthcoming \nrainy season, he will state the measures taken and/or being envisaged to mitigate the risk of \nflooding in the flood prone areas in Port Louis, particularly at the beginning of Ruisseau du \nPouce in the vicinity of Crown land Tory and Rivulet Pailles. \n\n37",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Land Drainage Authority that the \nCity Centre of Port Louis has been declared a high-risk prone area in August 2019. The \nregion of Port Louis, particularly the city centre, is highly exposed to the floodwater \nemanating from the mountain range, that is, Le Pouce and Signal Mountain, and is bordered \nby the mountain range upstream and is, in fact, a trough, that is a “cuvette” by nature of its \ntopography, and downstream it is bordered by the sea. \nAccordingly, the discharge of surface runoff is highly dependent on the tidal levels at \nthe discharge point, which is Bassin Caudan. In the event of a concurrent scenario of a \ntorrential rain and storm surge, the evacuation of floodwaters is inhibited due to the effect of \ntidal locking. This causes a rapid rise in the water level in the low points, namely at Poudrière \nStreet, Ruisseau du Pouce, Caudan and La Chaussée Street, amongst others. \nMadam Speaker, the flood-mitigating measures earmarked within the region of Port \nLouis include the following – \n• \nDrain along Lord Kitchener Street; \n• \nDrain along Dr. Raoul Rivet Street; \n• \nDrain along Pope Hennessy Street; \n• \nraising of walls along Ruisseau de Créole stream; \n• \nraising of banks along Le Pouce stream; \n• \nreconstruction of bridges along Le Pouce stream, and \n• \nupgrading of Boulevard Victoria Bridge, Vallée Pitot. \nThe following projects have been completed – \n• \ndrain works at Caudan along Motorway M1 at Place d’Armes; \n• \ndrain works at Cité Rosemont, Vallée Pitot; \n• \ndrains works at Boulevard Rivaltz, Tranquebar; \n• \ndrains works at Jules Mallac, Tranquebar; \n• \nupgrading of Canal Anglais; \n\n38 \n \n• \nconstruction baffle tank near STR Marketing, and  \n• \nremoval of cover slabs in front of Winners. \nThe raising of walls along Ruisseau du Pouce consists – \n(i) \nraising of the existing bank walls, varying from 0.5 metres to 3 metres at different \nlocations, and  \n(ii) \nreconstruction of several bridges across Ruisseau du Pouce, including Gayasingh \nBridge and two bridges in Caudan premises. \nThe first phase of the project comprises the raising of the walls up to the deck of the \nexisting bridges and is currently ongoing.  \nIn view of the constraints within the region of Port Louis, the proposal of implementing \na cut-off drain at the foot of Le Pouce and Moneron Hill is being looked into by the Drains \nInfrastructure Construction Ltd. The geotechnical investigation is currently ongoing. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that the Municipal City Council of Port Louis \ncarried out desilting and cleaning works along the stretch of Ruisseau du Pouce, in the \nvicinity of Crown Land Tory, Tranquebar, in February and April 2024. \nIn addition, all the concrete slabs over Ruisseau du Pouce have been removed from ex-\nMajestic Cinema to Brown Sequard Street and from Brown Sequard Street to Chaussée \nStreet. 90% of the works have been completed. \nAs regards the demolition of the KFC outlet, as at date, 95% of the works have been \ncompleted, and for the demolition works at the parking spaces of MEDCOR and Rogers Co. \nLtd., bids are being evaluated. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to Rivulet Pailles, desilting works along the St Louis \nRiver were effected over a stretch of 4.670 km in May 2024. The council has effected the \nclearing of the watercourse from overgrown vegetation and removal of obstructive materials, \nespecially in the region of Avenue Cardinal 5 in November and December 2024. \nMadam Speaker, as for measures to mitigate the risk of flooding in the vicinity of \nCrown Land Tory, I am informed by the LDA that a drain project has been identified for \n\n39 \n \nimplementation thereat. In this respect, the NDU carried out two bidding exercises for the \nappointment of a contractor for the construction of a flood wall at Nazareth, Tranquebar.  \nThe scope of works comprises, inter alia, the following – \n• \nconstruction of a flood wall over an approximate stretch of 400 m on both sides \nof Le Pouce stream; \n• \nbackfilling compaction and reinstatement of roads; \n• \nconcrete lining of riverbed over an approximate stretch of 400 m, and \n• \ndesilting works over an approximate stretch of 125 m. \nHowever, as the bids received were unresponsive, both bidding exercises were \ncancelled. \nMadam Speaker, following the unsuccessful bidding exercises carried out by the NDU, \nthe project was referred to the Drains Infrastructure Construction Ltd for implementation. A \nfirst invitation for bids was launched, but no recommendation for award was made. \nTherefore, a second bidding exercise was carried out, and financial clearance is awaited \nbefore an award can be made. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister, as far as \nRivulet Pailles is concerned, whether his Ministry will leave no stone unturned as to the \nillegal construction of a poultry building that has been the cause of deviation torrential rain \nover the inhabitants living in Cardinal 5 and causing major chaos? \nMr Gunness: I will certainly look into it because I am now being informed by the \nMember. So, I will look into it. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nDr. Aumeer: I have heard a very exhaustive reply from the hon. Minister and I am glad \nto say that a lot of works are being planned for the inhabitants of Camp Tory, Tranquebar, \nparticularly Le Pouce stream. May I ask the hon. Minister, until and so forth, these works are \n\n40 \n \nto be completed and in the advent of summer rains coming up, particularly torrential rains, \nwhether he will make it a priority that those houses that have been earmarked in Tranquebar \nand along Mgr. Leen, particularly the six families, these people will be given priority of \nrelocation or at least be evacuated promptly during torrential rains to avoid casualties? Thank \nyou. \nMr Gunness: As far as the evacuation plan is concerned, there is an evacuation plan \nbeing prepared and has been circulated between different ministries. Among the evacuation \nplan, we have voluntary evacuation and also mandatory evacuation. So, we will act, \nobviously, when we come in front of the situation.  \nMadam Speaker: Next question, hon. First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand \nRiver South East, Mr Baboolall! \nPELLEGRIN, SEBASTOPOL, BRAMSTHAN, BEL AIR & BEAU CHAMP – WATER \nSUPPLY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/20",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 20,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities —",
      "question": "(No. B/20) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to water supply in the \nregions of Pellegrin, Sebastopol, Bramsthan, Bel Air and Beau Champ, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as – \n(a) \nto the reasons for the erratic distribution thereof, indicating the remedial measures \nenvisaged therefor, and  \n(b) \nexpected time-frame for the provision thereof on a 24/7 basis.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Central Water Authority that \nthe regions of Pellegrin, Bramsthan, Bel Air, Beau Champ and Sebastopol form part of the \nCentral Water Authority Water Supply Zone. Except for Beau Champ, where water is \nsupplied on a 24-hour basis, I am informed that the other regions have intermittent water \nsupply. It is to be highlighted that there has been a general drop in production levels in the \nboreholes and surface water due to the deficit of rainfall during the year and the prolonged \ndry season. However, the situation has improved following the recent heavy rains in the East \nregion.  \n\n41 \n \nAs far as Pellegrin and Sebastopol are concerned, Madam Speaker, these regions are \nserved by Melrose Reservoir, which sources water from Quartier Militaire Reservoir and \nPetit Paquet borehole. Melrose Reservoir also supplies Sans Souci, Montagne Blanche and \nexports water to Etoile Reservoir. Pellegrin and Sebastopol receive, respectively, 5 hours and \n8 hours of water supply daily. \nI am informed that the dry spell that prevailed in 2024 has affected production from the \nPetit Paquet borehole, which has declined by 17%. This deficit was mitigated by installing a \ncontainerised pressure filter at the Melrose Reservoir, supplying 1000 m³ per day. The recent \nrainfall has restored normal production to normal levels. \nMadam Speaker, for Bramsthan, I am informed by the Central Water Authority that it is \nserviced by Montagne Fayence Reservoir, Bonne Mère Reservoir and a containerised \npressure filter at Bramsthan River. Part of Bramsthan, including areas such as Morcellement \nVRS, Lallbahadoor Road, Kalipa and Shivala Road, enjoys a water supply of 18 hours daily, \nwhile part of Bramsthan, that is, Chemin Dominique, Nunka Road, Morcellement La Gaieté, \nDowtall Road, Shivala Road, and Bernard Road, are supplied with 10 hours of water daily. \nThe prolonged dry season has caused a reduction in production from Belle Rose, \nClemencia borehole, by 37.5%, and from Bramsthan containerised pressure filter, by nearly \n50%. Valve operation had to be carried out to rationalise distribution of water. Water tankers \nwere deployed to service the most affected areas, namely Shivala Road, Lallbahadoor Road \nand Morcellement VRS. With the recent rainfall, production has improved, and tankers trips \nhave also been reduced. \nMadam Speaker, concerning the region of Bel Air, I am informed that it is supplied by \nBelle Rose, Clemencia Reservoir, which sources its water from Belle Rose Clemencia \nBorehole, Caroline Borehole. The normal hours of supply at Bel Air are 12 hours daily. \nThe normal hours of supply at Bel Air are 12 hours daily. The production from the \nsources has dropped significantly during the dry season, leading to a revision in hours of \nsupply from 12 to eight hours daily. Water tankers were deployed to the affected areas.  \nAs for the Beau Champ region, it has started to be supplied with water on a 24-hour \nbasis only in August 2024, following the installation of a containerised pressure filter at Beau \nChamp Deep River. However, technical issues encountered in October 2024 with the booster \n\n42 \n \npump have led to interruptions in parts of Morcellement Beau Champ. The Central Water \nAuthority is in the process of procuring a new pump, which is expected to be operational by \nApril 2025. Meanwhile, valve operations and water tankers are being deployed as an interim \nsolution. \nJe voudrais, Madame la présidente, avant de terminer, ajouter que pour l’honorable \nmembre et les autres membres de la Chambre, la stratégie de mobilisation des ressources en \neau de traitement, de stockage et de distribution d’eau en vue d’améliorer \nl’approvisionnement en eau de la population est en cours de révision. Malheureusement, \nfaudra le dire, suite à l’incapacité du gouvernement précédent à mettre en œuvre ses \npromesses de 2014 « delo 24/7 », les parties prenantes concernées seront consultées en temps \net lieu. \nMerci, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Je vous en prie. You have no supplementary? We have three \nminutes left. Maybe I shall suspend the Sitting for one and a half hour at this stage. \nAt 12.58 p.m. the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.41 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated!  \nWe resume Questions. Hon. First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River \nSouth East, Mr Baboolall! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 10 – FLOOD PRONE AREAS – SURVEY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/21",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 21,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government —",
      "question": "(No. B/21) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to flooding in Constituency No. \n10, Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East, he will state if a survey has been carried \nout to identify the flood prone areas to avoid recurrent flooding in the different regions \nthereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Land Drainage Authority (LDA) \nthat it has identified 14 sites as flood-prone areas in Constituency No. 10, and they are as \nfollows – \n\n43 \n \n• \nNear Bel Air SSS area; \n• \nTagore Road, Ernest Florent; \n• \nMorcellement Verger, Bel Air; \n• \nPont Lardier, Bel Air; \n• \nBramsthan and Dowtal area; \n• \nNear Chapelle area, Clemencia; \n• \nAvenue des Echassiers; \n• \nAvenue Merle, Camp de Masques; \n• \nMelrose, Cooperative Road ; \n• \nHamza Road, Melrose ; \n• \nSans Souci, Montagne Blanche ; \n• \nTourterelle Road, Montagne Blanche ; \n• \nAvenue Perruche, Montagne Blanche, and  \n• \nJunction Petit Paquet Road. \nMadam Speaker, it is to be highlighted that the flood-prone areas are dynamic as a \nresult of climate change and land cover changes. \nI am further informed that the LDA carries out regular surveys and consultations with \nrelevant stakeholders to update the flood-prone areas in Mauritius. In order to mitigate the \nrisk of flooding, several drain projects are being implemented under the National Flood \nManagement Programmes. \nIn this context, I am informed that various drain projects have been completed so far, \nand there are presently four projects which are ongoing, namely – \n• \nMorcellement Bel Etang, Camp de Masque; \n• \nDrain works at Sans Souci Road, Montagne Blanche; \n\n44 \n \n• \nDrain works at Shivala Road, Petit Paquet, Montagne Blanche, near Louis Sylvio \nHouse, and  \n• \nUpgrading of bridge Camp Sonar, Camp de Masque Pavé. \nOn the other hand, the District Council of Flacq is undertaking cleaning and desilting of \nrivers of the following sites – \n• \nBel Air Rivière Sèche; \n• \nClemencia; \n• \nCamp de Masque; \n• \nCamp de Masque Pavé; \n• \nEcroignard; \n• \nTrou D’eau Douce; \n• \nMedine, and \n• \nDeep River. \nMadam Speaker, since I joined office, I have already had meetings with various local \nauthorities, including the District Council of Flacq, in order to take cognisance of their \nflooding problems, with a view to finding sustainable solutions. \nI wish to add that a meeting was also held at the Municipal Council of Port Louis on \nThursday, 05 December, under the chairmanship of hon. Govindranath Gunness, Minister of \nNational Infrastructure, in order to discuss necessary actions being taken and to be taken for \nthe cleaning of drains and rivers across the country in the wake of the rainy season. Hence, all \nnecessary actions are being taken to prevent flooding during heavy rainfall in flood-prone \nareas. I am tabling a list of the projects completed in Constituency No. 10. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. First Member for Port Louis Maritime and Port \nLouis East!  \n \n\n45 \n \nKINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA – MONETARY DONATION – MOSQUES \nREFURBISHMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/22",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 22,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister Arts and Culture —",
      "question": "(No. B/22) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port Louis Maritime & Port Louis \nEast) asked the Minister Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the donation of USD 5 \nmillion from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for the refurbishment of mosques, he will state \nwhere matters stand. \nThe Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade \n(Mr D. Ramful): Madam Speaker, you would appreciate that there has been much dilly-dally \nand opacity around this matter by the previous government, of course. With your permission, \nI shall provide a detailed answer in order to clarify the situation. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that the proposed amount for the donation \nfor the refurbishment of mosques by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia amounts to USD 6m. \ninstead of USD 5m., as mentioned in the PQ.  \nI wish to recall that on 05 August 2019, the Royal Saudi Embassy in Pretoria, South \nAfrica, addressed a note verbale to our High Commission in Pretoria informing them that the \ngovernment of Saudi Arabia had acceded to the request made by Mauritius for a donation of \nthe sum of USD 6m. to the government of Mauritius as assistance to support the needs and \nrequirements of the mosques in Mauritius. \nIn June 2022, the Saudi government dispatched an inter-ministerial delegation, mainly \nmaulanas, to Mauritius to conduct a visual assessment of the requirements of the mosques. \nThe report of the Saudi delegation and its recommendations were submitted for approval to \nthe Royal Court in Saudi Arabia. On 07 April 2023, the Royal Consulate General of Saudi \nArabia in Mauritius sent a note verbale requesting a draft MoU to be signed so that the Saudi \nside may initiate the grant procedures. The request was sent to the Prime Minister’s office for \nconsideration. The final version of the draft MoU was submitted by the Ministry of Finance, \nEconomic Development and Planning on 12 October 2023, nearly 6 months after. Following \ninternal consultation with the then Ministry of Arts and Cultural Heritage, the initial draft \nMoU was amended to reflect the new proposals, and same was vetted by the Solicitor \nGeneral. \n\n46 \n \nOn 18 October 2023, the embassy in Riyadh transmitted the draft MoU in English to \nthe Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Saudi Arabia through diplomatic channels. The same MoU \nwas translated into Arabic and transmitted to the Saudi authorities on 26 October 2023. \nIn February 2024, the Ministry of Islamic Affairs, Dawah and Guidance of Saudi \nArabia informed that the MoU would be finalised upon the completion of all the procedures. \nThe Saudi ambassador in Mauritius was expected to facilitate the process, as the latter holds \nthe authority for the signature of the MoU and the disbursement of the first instalment. The \nwhole process, Madam Speaker, for disbursement was to be completed as follows – \n• \nthe payment was to be made in three instalments from the Saudi government; \n• \nthe work was to be implemented in three phases, \n• \nthe first phase was to cover 65 to 75 mosques approximately. \nOn 25 June 2024, the Saudi authorities informed Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Regional \nIntegration and International Trade of the proposal to add an additional clause to Article 3 of \nthe draft MoU.  \nOn 04 July 2024, the then Ministry of Art and Culture Heritage informed the Ministry \nof Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade that legal advice of the \nSolicitor General was sought with regard to the additional clause proposed by the Saudi \nauthorities. The Solicitor General advised that the clause proposed by the Saudi authorities \nshould be incorporated in the draft MoU. The Solicitor General also proposed some minor \nchanges.  \nOn 04 July 2024, the amended draft MoU, incorporating amendments proposed by both \nsides, was sent to the embassy of Saudi Arabia in Mauritius with a request to expedite the \nsignature of the MoU. On 22 August 2024, the mission in Riyadh forward in the last version \nof the MoU, including the amendments proposed by the Solicitor General, was officially \ntranslated into Arabic. On 23 August 2024, the draft MoU, the English version along with a \ntranslated version in Arabic, was sent to the embassy of Saudi Arabia in Mauritius. \nCabinet noted inter alia at its meeting of 23 August 2024 that the final agreement of the \nSaudi authorities is still awaited. On 06 September 2024, the embassy of Saudi Arabia in \nMauritius sent a final version of the MoU between the Ministry of Islamic Affairs, Dawah \n\n47 \n \nand Guidance in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the trust fund of the Islamic Cultural \nOffice in Mauritius. According to available records at the Ministry, on the same day, an entry \nwas made to the effect that a correspondence on that matter was dispatched to the Prime \nMinister’s Office by my Ministry. It is a matter of concern, Madam Speaker, that neither the \noriginal letter nor a copy thereof could be traced out from the record.  \nOn 10 September 2024, a meeting was held with the Saudi ambassador in Mauritius \nand the former Prime Minister to discuss the way forward, but we have not been informed of \nthe outcome of that meeting. On 16 September 2024, as the issue was brought to the forefront \nfollowing publication of an internal note from the Ministry, a communiqué was issued by the \nMinistry of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade to confirm that with \nregard to the proposed donation of USD 6 million. from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, no \ndisbursement has been effected whatsoever to Mauritius as of date. Since 06 September 2024, \nMadam Speaker, no progress whatsoever was made on this issue from the then government \ndespite persistent questions being raised in the media. \nOn 27 November 2024, when the new government took office, following a request \nfrom my ministry for clarification, the embassy of Saudi Arabia informed the ministry that \nthey had already submitted the final version of the MoU since 06 September 2024 to the \nMinistry of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade to be finalised. On \n09 December 2024, the embassy of Saudi Arabia once again confirmed that the final MoU \nwas sent on 06 September 2024, and a copy of the same has been forwarded anew to my \nministry. \nMadam Speaker, my ministry now proposes to take up the matter upon the return of the \nambassador of Saudi Arabia, who is currently out of the country. Thank you, Madam \nSpeaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes, hon. Juman!",
      "answer": "Mr Juman: Merci, Madame la présidente. Merci d’abord d’avoir restauré la \ndémocratie parlementaire. Madam Speaker, it is a matter of great concern listening to the \nreply of the minister. If official documents are missing from the file, can I know from the \nhon. Minister if he will consider referring the matter for enquiry regarding the missing \ndocuments? \n\n48 \n \nMr Ramful: Yes, I can confirm to the hon. Member that I have already asked the \nofficers of my ministry to initiate an enquiry. If need be, the matter will be referred to the \nPolice. \nMr Juman: Thank you, Madam Speaker. It has been more than five years; does the \nhon. Minister intend to speed up the process since it has been more than five years, as I have \nsaid?  \nMadam Speaker: He just replied to that. He has already replied to that!  \nMr Juman: No. \nMadam Speaker: Never mind. Go ahead!  \nMr Ramful: I can reassure the hon. Member that as soon as the Ambassador of Saudi \nArabia is back in the country, I am going to speak to him, and I will see to it that the matter is \nspeeded up. \nMadam Speaker: Your next question, please!  \nNPF & NSF – INVESTMENTS BREAKDOWN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/23",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 23,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity —",
      "question": "(No. B/23) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port Louis Maritime & Port Louis \nEast) asked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \nwhether, in regard to the National Pension Fund and the National Solidary Fund, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain in each case, information as to – \n(a) \nthe investments effected therefrom, giving a breakdown as to the amount thereof, \nand  \n(b) if the amount invested into United Investments Ltd (UIL) has been recovered and, if \nso, give a breakdown thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Subron: Madam Speaker, first, let me thank the hon. Member for his question, \nwhich is of utmost public interest. The more so that his question concerns funds related to the \npast and present contributions of workers and their future pension entitlements.  \nI also understood from the Hansard of this Assembly that the hon. Member was ordered \nout and asked to be collected from this Assembly when he asked a similar question to the \nthen Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity in 2024.  \n\n49 \n \nThe hon. Member can now rest assured that as the new minister, I will answer all \nquestions which are of public interest. This is what this House is made for. I will further \nexpand on this aspect later in my reply. Second, I am assuming in his question the hon. \nMinister made reference to the National Solidarity Fund when in fact he is referring to the \nNational Savings Fund; thus, I will respond… \nMadam Speaker: You mean the hon. Member? \nMr Subron: Hon. Member.  \nIn relation to the second part of the question, I am also assuming that when the hon. \nMember is referring to the investments in United Investments Ltd (UIL), he is also referring \nto Hold Attitude Ltd, which is a related company of UIL and was created as a result of a \nrestructuring of UIL’s level in 2019. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that, first, the National Pensions Fund \n(NPF) was established under Section 37 of the National Pensions Act 1976 with the objective \nto have a publicly run contributory pension system to provide for various types of pensions to \nworkers of this country. \nThe NPF is administered by the Minister of Social Security and the NPF/NSF \nInvestment Committee set up as per Section 38 of the National Pensions Act 1976. In 2020, \nthe previous government unilaterally, without consultations with stakeholders, decided to do \naway with the National Pension Scheme. Thus, since October 2020, employees and \nemployers no longer contribute to the NPF. The ministry is now administering the past \ncontributions made to the fund. \nThe National Savings Fund was established under Section 3 of the National Savings \nFund Act 1995 with the objectives to provide for the payment of a lump sum to every \nemployee on his retirement or in respect of every employee at the time of his death and to set \nup and operate for the benefits of employees such schemes, including loan schemes, as may \nbe prescribed. Employers contribute 2.5% in respect of each employee; thus, the Fund is still \noperational and administered by my ministry. \nMadam Speaker, in regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that at the end of \nSeptember 2024 the total value of investments of the NPF stood at around Rs160.5 billion \nand the value of investment of the NSF stood at around Rs45.5 billion. I am also pleased to \nannounce to the hon. Members in this House that in line with the policy of change and \n\n50 \n \nrupture of the new government, I am tabling today the full detailed list of investments for \nboth NPF and NSF as of September 2024. \nTotal disclosure to the National Assembly on matters of public interest and public funds \nwill henceforth be the norm of my ministry, thus creating conditions for citizens to monitor \nand be a watchdog on matters of public interest and public funds. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that the amount \ninvested in United Investments Ltd has not yet been recovered. I wish to inform the House \nthat UIL is an investment holding company quoted on the Mauritian Development Enterprise \nMarket (DEM). After an internal restructuring of the company, the financial and non-\nfinancial clusters of UIL were separated, and thereafter Hold Attitude Ltd was regrouped \nunder the hospitality cluster. The NPF and NSF now deal with Hold Attitude ltd. \nMadam Speaker, in March 2022, NPF and NSF invested, in aggregate, an amount of \nRs1.5 billion in a secured bond issued by Hold Attitude Ltd and split as follows – \n(i) \nNPF – Rs1,001,439,000  \n(ii) \nNSF – Rs448,561,000 \nThe security offered was a pledge of a 40% stake in the shares of Attitude Hospitality \nLtd. As of February 2024, these shares were valued at around Rs2.29 billion by KPMG. As of \n03 December 2024, Hold Attitude Ltd owes an amount of Rs1,084,948,311 to NPF and \nRs485,960,194 to NSF. I am tabling the details of the respective amounts held by Hold \nAttitude Ltd as at 03 December 2024 to the NPF and NSF. For the period of March to \nSeptember 2023, there was accrued interest of Rs89.5 million for the NPF and Rs40.1 million \nfor NSF, which was settled on 12 June 2024. A penalty of 3% above the applicable interest \nrate on account of late payment of interest which was due on 30 September 2023 was also \nreceived on 01 July 2024 for an amount of Rs10.8 million. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that on 20 September 2024, Hold Attitude Ltd \nmade a request to the NPF/NSF Investment Committee to extend the maturity date of 30 \nSeptember 2024 to 31 March 2025 to give them time to list the shares of Attitude Hospitality \nLtd on the stock exchange of Mauritius. Hold Attitude Ltd. was informed via a letter dated 24 \nSeptember 2024 that the NPF/NSF Investment Committee will not grant any delay in the \nrepayment date, and they were strictly reminded to settle the amount due together with the \ninterest on the due date on 30 September 2024. \n\n51 \n \nThe NPF/NSF Investment Committee has decided on 20 September 2024 that in the \nevent that Hold Attitude Ltd does not repay the capital amount of the bond, an interest due for \nthe period 01 October 2023 to 30 September 2024, NPF and NSF will trigger the event of \ndefault and will initiate procedures with the security agent State Bank of Mauritius Ltd so \nthat these pledged shares will be transferred to the ownership of NPF and NSF. According to \nthe Note Subscription Agreement, the event of default could not be triggered after five \nbusiness days after the due date of 30 September 2024. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to point out that Hold Attitude Ltd made another request via a \nletter dated 30 September 2024, that is, on the due date, requesting the NPF and NSF \nInvestment Committee to extend the capital repayment for a period of two to three years or \nearlier. Upon listing of Attitude Hospitality Ltd, they have also made a request to delay the \nrepayment of interest due on 30 September to 31 December 2024. The NPF-NSF Investment \nCommittee met with the representatives of AHL Attitude Ltd on 02 October 2024. They \nexplained to the committee the series of events that have prevented them from paying the \ndebts due to NPF and NSF. \nI am informed that the NPF-NSF Investment Committee deliberated and agreed to the \nextension of capital repayment until 31 March 2025, but interest due was to be paid \nimmediately. AHL informed the NPF and NSF that they would only be able to repay the \ninterest due in September 2024 by the end of December 2024, following the sale of some of \ntheir clusters under UIL Ltd. It is also to be noted that a penalty of 3% above the applicable \ninterest rate is being imposed on Hold Attitude Ltd for the delay in repayment of interest and \ncapital. \nAs at date, interest due on 30 December 2024 has not yet been settled. The NPF-NSF \nInvestment Committee is closely monitoring the situation regarding the repayment of capital \nand recovery of interest with respect to investment by NPF and NSF in Hold Attitude Ltd. In \nline with the provision of the existing law and the subscription agreement, in the event of \ndefault, the NPF-NSF Investment Committee will have to take a decision in the sole and best \ninterest of the two funds, the NPF and the NSF. Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Juman! \nMr Juman: Merci, Madame la présidente. \n\n52 \n \nMadam Speaker: It was very comprehensive. \nMr Juman: Yes. \nMadam Speaker: But you still have a question? \nMr Juman: Yes, I still have. Thank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Je ne veux pas vous décourager. \nMr Juman: Merci, M. le ministre. Malgré l’assurance donnée par l’ancienne ministre \nque la totalité de la somme, R 1,45 milliard, serait remboursée en fin de septembre/octobre, \ncela n’a pas été le cas. Maintenant, on est dans une situation où on n’arrive même pas à payer \nl’intérêt. On a R 1,45 milliard qui est à risque. M. le ministre, est-ce qu’on doit attendre \njusqu’à mars pour pouvoir récupérer l’argent venant de la sueur des travailleurs ? \nMr Subron: I am informed the issue will be discussed in the next meeting of the NPF-\nNSF Investment Committee. I am also informed that the committee could not meet because \nof lack of quorum in the two previous meetings. \nMr Juman: Last, Madam Speaker. Thank you. Can I know from the hon. Minister if \nthere has been any due diligence exercise conducted on UIL, and if yes, who conducted the \nsame, and if not, why not? \nMr Subron: I do not have this information, but I can assure the Member when I have \nthe information, I will inform the House. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, your last question was already replied to. So, I will now move \nto hon. Second Member for Rodrigues, Mr François! \nCOVID-19 PANDEMIC – DIALYSIS PATIENTS DEMISE – FACT-FINDING \nCOMMITTEE REPORT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/24",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 24,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness —",
      "question": "(No. B/24) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port Louis Maritime & Port Louis \nEast) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the death of dialysis \npatients during the COVID-19 pandemic, he will state if he proposes to render public the \nreport of the Fact-Finding Committee thereon. \n\n53",
      "answer": "(Vide reply to PQ I B/18) \nQUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL, RODRIGUES – CT-SCAN & X-RAY \nAPPARATUS – OPERATIONALITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-10-december-2024",
        "friday-20-december-2024"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/25",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 25,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr Francois)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness —",
      "question": "(No. B/25) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nHealth and Wellness whether, in regard to the CT-Scan apparatus and X-Ray apparatus at the \nQueen Elizabeth Hospital in Rodrigues, he will state if they are operational and, if not, the \nmeasures envisaged to ensure the continuity of these services thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I am informed by Rodrigues Regional Assembly that the \nCT scan apparatus at Queen Elizabeth Hospital is not operational since 01 December 2023, \nwhile the X-ray apparatus is functional. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that the only CT scan of the island is not \noperational despite numerous interventions being done by technicians from the supplier who \nproceeded to Rodrigues in October last. In fact, a technician arrived in Rodrigues from South \nAfrica in October 2024 and initiated the repair of the CT scanner. The Commission for \nHealth and Others is continuously proceeding with repairs and other interventions on this \nequipment, which is costly to the Rodrigues Regional Assembly. \nTherefore, prior to approving any further intervention on the equipment in November \n2024, the commission has sought the technical advice and expertise of my ministry for the \npreparation of specifications of a new, more performing CT scanner. The Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly will make funds available within its budget estimates for the financial year 2024-\n25 for the purchase of a new CT scanner. \nMadam Speaker, meanwhile, patients requiring CT scans are being referred to \nMauritius, and the cost of travel and accommodation for the patient and accompanying family \nmember is being borne by the commission. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nMr François: Thank you, hon. Minister. Will the hon. Minister agree with me that \nthere is the urgency for remedial action to save people’s lives in Rodrigues? You will recall \nthe recent tragedy of the little E.E.J. as stated by hon. Mrs Savabaddy in PQ I B/13. She was \n\n54 \n \nmedically transferred to Mauritius from Rodrigues, as there is no CT scan in Rodrigues. \nThere is urgency. \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, we are aware of this problem. That is the reason why we \nare precipitating with this issue. We are hardly two weeks old now. So, within a few months, \nwe will do the needful, I can assure you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Your next question, please! \nCHANG FONG II FISHING VESSEL –  BREACH OF LAW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/26",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 26,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr Francois)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries —",
      "question": "(No. B/26) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to the fishing \nvessel Chang Fong II, he will state if the vessel has, on or about mid-November 2024, been \ncontravened in breach of the Fisheries and Marine Resources Act 2023 at the Port Mathurin \nHarbour and Port Louis Harbour and, if so, give details thereon and the action taken in \nrelation thereto.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you. I thank the hon. Member for putting this question. Madam \nSpeaker, I am informed that on 15 November 2024, while inspecting the fishing vessel Chang \nFong II in Port Mathurin, officers of the National Coast Guard and the Fisheries Protection \nService of Rodrigues had discovered several shark fins measuring between 7 and 57 cm on \nboard the vessel. \nAs a party to the South Indian Ocean Fisheries Association and Indian Ocean Tuna \nCommission, Mauritius cannot remain indifferent and insensitive to the worst form of cruelty. \nA sharp knife was used to slice the fin, and the bleeding shark was thrown into high seas to \ndie. Unfortunately, the fine for this serious offence is a fixed penalty of Rs5,000 only. I will \nseek advice from the State Law Office to review the fine. Since we have a national plan for \nthe conservation of sharks, the killer should not get away. \nA contravention has been established against the vessel for breach of section 28 of the \nFisheries Act 2023, namely for Prohibition on Removal and Sale of Shark Fins. The shark \nfins have been seized, and the matter will be prosecuted before the Court of Justice in \nRodrigues. If proved guilty, the operator will be liable to pay a fine not exceeding Rs40 m. or \nfive years of imprisonment. \n\n55 \n \nI am further informed, and I was rather shocked and flabbergasted, to learn that the \nvessel left Rodrigues on 16 November 2024 and reached Port Louis Harbour on 21 \nNovember 2024 after a fishing campaign on the Hawkins Bay. On its arrival in port, the \nvessel was inspected, and this exercise revealed the presence of toxic fish, namely barracuda, \non board. In this respect, the master of the vessel was issued a fixed penalty notice under \nsection 202 of the Fisheries Act 2023. The master has up to 12 December 2024 to pay the \nfixed penalty, failing which the matter will be prosecuted in court. \nMoreover, it was also noted during the inspection that the information contained in the \nlogbook was inaccurate and incomplete. As this is an infringement under section 46(2) of the \nFisheries Act, my Ministry has initiated an investigation in view of prosecuting the operator. \nIf found guilty, the latter again will be liable to pay a fine not exceeding Rs40 m. or five \nyears of imprisonment. \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed that on 23 November 2024, Froid des \nMascareignes Ltd had refused to take part of the fish that was on board the vessel as it did not \nmeet the temperature for preservation of frozen fish which is equal or less than -18 degrees \ncelcius.  \nThe Ministry of Health investigated the matter and determined that the fish was deemed \nto be unfit for human consumption in breach of section 143 (1) (b) of Food Regulations 2024.  \nThe fish was accordingly disposed of at sea at a distance of about 9.3 nautical miles \nfrom Port Louis. This operation was supervised by officers of my Ministry and the Ministry \nof Health.  \nThe fishing vessel is moored in the port of Port Louis and will not be allowed to sail for \nfishing expeditions. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister. \nHon. First Member for Montagne Blanche… \nMr François: Madam Speaker. \n \nMadam Speaker: I am sorry, you did not catch my eye. I have already called… I am \nso sorry; we have only 30 minutes to go. Let us give a chance to everybody. We will not \n\n56 \n \nreach the end. So, let us move on with Mr Baboolall, hon. First Member for Montagne \nBlanche and Grand River South East! \nLATE MINOR E. K. G FAMILY – PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT & ASSISTANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/27",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 27,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare —",
      "question": "(No. B/27) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the alleged \nmurder and sexual aggression of minor E. K. G. on or about 29 November 2024, she will \nstate the support and assistance her Ministry extended or proposes to extend to the victim’s \nfamily.",
      "answer": "Mrs Navarre-Marie: Madam Speaker, I am informed that on Friday, 29 November \n2024, around 19.40 hours, Mrs M.C.N.L. noticed that her granddaughter, late minor E.K.G., \n7 years old, was nowhere to be found. The minor was spending her school holidays at her \nplace since 23 November 2024. The grandmother proceeded to Bain des Dames Police \nStation to report the matter. There, the police officers viewed the CCTV footage of the \nregion, which revealed that a man was holding the hand of the minor and was walking \ntowards Cassis Bridge. The grandmother identified the man as one A.R. \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed that on 30 November 2024 at 4.00 hours, police \narrested the alleged perpetrator, Mr A.R., residing at La Butte, Port Louis. The latter \nconfessed to having murdered minor E.K.G. The dead body was found in a wasteland behind \nSt. Georges Cemetery at Bain des Dames. An autopsy was conducted by the Police Medical \nOfficer. The cause of death was attributed to asphyxia by choking. \nMadam Speaker, on the same day, I visited the grandmother at Bain des Dames, Cassis, \nand the biological mother at Chebel. I remained in contact with the biological father by \nphone. Meanwhile, officers of my Ministry visited the relatives, where necessary \npsychological support and counselling were provided to them. \nMadam Speaker, I would also wish to draw the attention of the House that following \nfurther investigations, it was revealed that the suspect published on social media several \npictures of himself with three other minors sitting on a bed, each holding a bottle of alcoholic \ndrink. At the material time of the death of late minor E.K.G., the pictures were still on social \nmedia. It would appear that this post has been online since last year. \n\n57 \n \nMadam Speaker, as soon as I was made aware of these publications, I immediately \ngave instructions to officers of my Ministry to report the matter to the Cybercrime Unit on 02 \nDecember 2024 and to have this post removed. The suspicious nature of these pictures has \ntriggered an inquiry at the level of my Ministry. Upon identification from the outset, a \npsychological assessment was also carried out with the three minors.  \nMadam Speaker, I personally instructed that an Emergency Protection Order be applied \nfor before the Children’s Court, in line with the provisions of the Children’s Act 2020, to \nenable medical examinations of the three minors. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to reiterate that violence against children in all its forms would \nnot be tolerated by this Government. This horrible crime against that child is testimony that \nwe still have to strengthen our legislation and place increased emphasis on education and \ncommunication campaigns to sensitise all citizens on the need to protect our children. There \nis also the need to report on any ill-treatment and harm upon a child or any suspected risk. \nMadam Speaker, a new protocol of collaboration with the Police are being designed to \ntackle such cases more efficiently in the future. The Assises de la femme et de la famille, \nwhich is being held today itself, will serve as a crucial platform, allowing NGOs as well as \nsocial and community workers to provide useful information that will serve to redefine our \npolicies and action plans, aiming at the development of innovative and re-engineer policies \nfor the welfare and protection of families, especially our children. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Baboolall, your last question! \nNEW FLACQ HOSPITAL – BUS SERVICE FACILITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/28",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 28,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport —",
      "question": "(No. B/28) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the New Flacq Hospital, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information \nas to whether consideration will be given for the provision of a regular bus service for the \npersons attending same.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the National Land \nTransport Authority (NLTA) that a regular bus service does exist at the New Flacq Hospital \nto service the approximate 870 visitors calling thereat daily. Currently, individual bus \n\n58 \n \noperators licensed to operate along bus routes 176, 112, and 232 are performing some 36 trips \non a daily basis at an average interval of 30 to 40 minutes, starting from 4.45 hrs in the \nmorning up until 19.00 hrs.  \nFurthermore, since the operation of the New Flacq Hospital in August this year, the \nNLTA has extended the itinerary of buses plying along routes 15, 16, and 17, and as such, six \nadditional trips are performed along the said routes to the hospital daily. \nMadam Speaker, moreover, the 32-seater buses of the NTC provide shuttle service \nfrom the hospital to Central Flacq whereby some 18 trips are carried out from 6 o’clock in the \nmorning up until 18.00 hrs. Additionally, some 159 taxis based in and around neighbouring \nlocalities, along with those 30 taxis based at the New Flacq Hospital, provide shuttle service \nto and fro from the hospital throughout the day. \nAs the New Flacq Hospital has recently been made operational, there are inevitably \nsome teething issues with regard to the public transport which still need to be addressed. In \nthis context, the NLTA has been requested by myself to extend the services of buses \noperating along Routes 18, 56, 55 and 194, which ply through the regions of Montagne \nBlanche and Grande Rivière Sud Est to enable the inhabitants thereat to easily access the \nNew Flacq Hospital.  \nMadam Speaker, following this Parliamentary Question, I have also requested the \nNLTA to effect a site visit to assess the level of service at the New Flacq Hospital, and I \nstand informed that no issues have been observed as regards the level of bus service at the \nNew Flacq Hospital.  \nI further stand guided by the regulator that initially complaints had been received at its \nlevel regarding the fact that passengers were alighting and boarding buses in a haphazard \nmanner outside the newly constructed traffic centre situated adjacent to the hospital, and this \nconstituted a road safety hazard. In this context, following instructions from the NLTA, the \nindividual bus operators are alighting and collecting passengers from the traffic centre. \nOn the other hand, the Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit has already placed \nappropriate traffic signs thereat to deter buses from stopping along that main road, while the \nPolice have been informed that regular patrols are being ensured thereat. \n\n59 \n \nMadam Speaker, to end, I am informed that my colleague, the Minister of Health and \nWellness, will be holding a site visit tomorrow with all relevant stakeholders, including \nrepresentatives from my Ministry to look into the issues raised in this Parliamentary Question \nas well as to look at ways and means to further facilitate bus users going in and out of the \nhospital. \nI am also informed that two site visits have already been conducted by the Director of \nHealth Services along with representatives of my Ministry. We remain open to the \nrecommendations of this committee led by my colleague, the Minister of Health, like I just \nsaid, also a former Minister of Land Transport and who is very familiar with the domain. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Hon. Third Member for Port Louis North \nand Montagne Longue, Mr Caserne! \nVALLÉE DES PRÊTRES, MORCELLEMENT RAMLAGUN – DRAINS \nCONSTRUCTION & FLOOD MITIGATION MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/29",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 29,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure —",
      "question": "(No. B/29) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to recurrent \nflooding in the region of Vallée des Prêtres, in particular, in Morcellement Ramlagun during \nrainy season, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Land Drainage \nAuthority/Drains Infrastructure Construction Ltd., information as to the projects for the \nconstruction of drains being envisaged thereat to mitigate the risk thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Land Drainage Authority that the \nregion of Vallée des Prêtres and its surroundings, including Morcellement Ramlagun, on 20 \nApril 2021, have been declared as a high-risk flood-prone area. On 13 March 2022, following \nheavy rainfall, the region of Morcellement Ramlagun was seriously inundated.  \nIn view of the potential risk to life, the following temporary measures were prescribed \nby the LDA for mitigating flooding thereat – \n1. \nremoval of all encroachments and obstructions and restoration of the natural \ndrainage path within Morcellement Ramlagun; \n2. \nrestoration of the Rivulet Reserve and the removal of debris at River Latanier; \n\n60 \n \n3. \nrivulet training works, that is, realignment of a stretch of 850 meters. These have \nbeen carried out by the National Development Unit and the Municipal City \nCouncil of Port Louis. \nMadam Speaker, in addition, the LDA recommended the construction of a flood wall at \nMorcellement Ramlagun to be implemented by the NDU and the upgrading of the existing \nbridge along Bernardin de Saint Pierre Road to ensure adequate hydraulic capacity to be \ncarried out by the RDA. To that effect, the NDU appointed Benchmark Consulting Engineers \nLtd., which submitted a preliminary design report on 12 May 2022 and a detailed design \nreport on 15 March 2023. The following flood-mitigating measures have been proposed by \nthe consultant – \n• \nconstruction of a cut-off drain at the foot of Mountain Le Pouce of varying \ndimensions, which discharges incoming flows into Latanier River through the \ntributaries; \n• \nupgrading, desilting, and lining of the existing tributaries and River Latanier; \n• \nconstruction of a flood wall of 4 meters high to protect the existing built-up \nsettlement, and  \n• \nupgrading the existing bridges and culverts along the different watercourses. \nMadam Speaker, it was also envisaged that the consultant would conduct a geotechnical \ninvestigation prior to the implementation of the project. However, in view of the significant \ndelay by the consultant, the project has been referred to the DICL on 09 August 2023, except \nfor the construction of the flood wall, which would be implemented by the NDU. \nAs at date, the LDA and the DICL are reviewing the design. Concurrently, the latter has \nawarded a contract to Water Research Company Ltd. on 04 October 2024 to carry out a \ngeotechnical investigation. Same is expected to be completed by the end of February 2025. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that the National Disaster Risk Reduction \nand Management Centre called a site meeting on 18 November 2024, where representatives \nof the NDU, DICL, amongst other stakeholders were present. At the meeting, it was agreed \nthat the DICL would take over the project. \n\n61 \n \nMadam Speaker, as regards the works allocated to the RDA, I am informed that the \nlatter awarded a contract to Gamma Construction on 28 September 2022 for the following \nworks – \n• \ndemolition of the existing Bernardin de Saint Pierre Bridge; \n• \nconstruction of a new reinforced concrete bridge of 21 meters wide and 3 meters \ndeep, and  \n• \nrelocation of existing services. \nThe implementation of the project suffered delays due to land acquisition issues, \nrerouting of sewer lines, and traffic diversion. Works resumed in April 2024 and continued \ntill August 2024, after which the traffic diversion scheme was communicated to the public. \nUnfortunately, this diversion scheme could not be implemented due to protests from the \ninhabitants. The RDA is currently working on an alternative design, which may entail further \nland acquisition. Works are expected to restart by the end of January 2025, and the \nconstruction period is estimated to be 8 months. \nMadam Speaker, over and above the proposed measures I mentioned earlier, regular \ndesilting of River Latanier has been undertaken. For instance, in July 2022, desilting of the \nriver over a length of 5 km was carried out. In March 2024, some 8.5 km of the river was \ndesilted; some Rs14 m. was spent on the desilting works. \nMadam Speaker, following torrential rainfall in April 2024, River Latanier has been \nsilted again. As an urgent measure, the Municipal City Council of Port Louis has been \nrequested to undertake desilting works on a stretch of 600 meters along Morcellement \nRamlagun. \nI am further informed that the Ministry of Local Government is currently seeking \nfinancial clearance for the desilting of another 8 km of River Latanier. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Your next question, Mr Caserne! \nABERCROMBIE MARKET FAIR – EXTENSION WORKS – COST & \nDURATION \n\n62",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/30",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 30,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government —",
      "question": "(No. B/30) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the extension works \ncurrently being carried out at the Abercrombie Market fair, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to the scope of works thereof, including the cost and duration \nthereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I am informed by the Municipal City \nCouncil of Port Louis (MCCPL) that an initial contract was awarded on 13 July 2021 for the \nproject ‘Construction of Multipurpose Complex and Music School’ at the Abercrombie \nMarket Fair. \nHowever, both the contract of the consultant and contractor had to be terminated given \nthat there were disagreements between the contractor and the consultant due to several issues \nsuch as certification of payments, approval of materials, and methodologies, among others. \nSubsequently, on 13 October 2022, the Ministry of Local Government requested the \nMinistry of National Infrastructure to provide a technical team to the MCCPL to design and \ncomplete the project. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the MCCPL that the scope of works is as follows – \n• \nconsolidation works and ancillaries at the ground floor of the existing market fair \narea in phases and make good; \n• \nrefurbishment of existing toilets and painting works for the whole market fairs \n(not included in initial contract); \n• \ncompletion of all outstanding works and allied works of the Multisports Complex \non the first floor; \n• \nelectrical and mechanical works, and last \n• \ntemporary shelter to relocate stallholders during consolidation works at ground \nfloor. \nThe proposed duration of the work is 300 days. A first bidding exercise was undertaken \nby the MCCPL through the Central Procurement Board (CPB) on 29 March 2024. By the \n\n63 \n \nclosing date of 07 May 2024, two bids were received. After evaluation of the bids, both were \nfound to be non-responsive.  \nIn this respect, the MCCPL brought some amendments to the bidding documents as \nrequested by the CPB. Same were submitted to the CPB on 29 November 2024 for vetting \nprior to the invitation of bids. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to the cost of the project, same would be known only after \nthe award of the contract. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Your last question, Mr Caserne!  \nThat will be the last question for today because we are reaching the time. \nABERCROMBIE POLICE STATION – METHADONE DISTRIBUTION – \nRELOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/31",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 31,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness —",
      "question": "(No. B/31) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the distribution of \nmethadone currently being carried out near the Abercrombie Police Station which is causing \ninconvenience to the inhabitants thereat, he will state if consideration will be given for the \nrelocation thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I wish to highlight to the House that the relocation of \nmethadone dispensing to another site without proper planning will tantamount to transferring \nthese inconveniences to other regions. I have been made aware that the Ministry has already \nembarked on a decentralisation process with a view to decreasing overcrowding at the \ndispensing sites and hence, minimising any inconveniences. In this regard, stable methadone \nbeneficiaries are being relocated to our primary health facilities, and this is a slow process. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that the whole project of decentralisation of \nmethadone dispensing will be addressed in the forthcoming National Drug Control Master \nPlan, which is being finalised by the National Drug Secretariat under the Prime Minister’s \noffice with all stakeholders, including my ministry. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka, we still have a \nfew minutes left. You have nine minutes left. \n\n64 \n \nNOUVELLE DECOUVERTE & L’AGREMENT, ST PIERRE – WATER PIPE \nRENEWAL WORKS – CONTRACT DETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/32",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 32,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities —",
      "question": "(No. B/32) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the water pipe renewal \nworks recently carried out by the Central Water Authority in the regions of Nouvelle \nDécouverte and L’Agrément, St Pierre, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nAuthority, information as to – \n(a) \nthe name of the contractor/s thereof, giving details in each case as to the  \n \n(i) \n contract value thereof;  \n \n(ii) \ncompletion date thereof, and  \n \n(iii) \npenalty clauses applicable for lateness, and  \n (b)  if an assessment of the works undertaken thereat was carried out and, if so, by \nwhom, giving details thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Yes, Madam Speaker, I am informed that the Central Water Authority \nhas undertaken renewal works for the ageing water pipeline infrastructure in the regions of \nNouvelle Découverte and L’Agrément, St Pierre. These projects aim to address challenges on \nfrequent bursts and leakages due to the pipelines having exceeded their intended service life.  \nA project for the renewal of pipelines at Nouvelle Découverte concerns approximately \n1.6 km of pipes along Rousset Road, Shivala Raod and Jokhoo Road.  \nMadam Speaker, regarding part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Central Water \nAuthority that on 25 April 2024, Pride Civil Engineering Contractor Ltd was awarded the \ncontract for the renewal of pipelines at Nouvelle Découverte (Phase 1) in the sum of \nRs8,165,535. The contract was for a duration of 90 days. The project commenced on 19 May \n2024 with a scheduled completion date of 17 August 2024, which was revised to 31 August \n2024 due to an extension of time granted. The actual completion date was 25 October 2024.  \nI am further informed, Madam Speaker, that a variation order in the sum of \nRs1,821,165 was issued to the contractor for the laying of temporary trench asphalt, bringing \nthe total value to Rs9,986,700. As per the condition of the contract, liquidated damages of \n\n65 \n \n10,000 per day are applicable for each day of delay, with a maximum amount of liquidated \ndamages being 10% of the contract value. \nI am informed that the project was supervised in-house by the Central Water \nAuthority’s Planning and Design Department. Assessment on site was conducted by the \ntechnical officers of the Central Water Authority. According to the assessment of works \ncarried out, the shifting of connection was completed on 25 October 2024 following testing, \ndisinfection, and connection work. \nThe Central Water Authority further informed that an interim payment made to the \ncontractor, that is, Pride, to date, stands at Rs6,443,098.25. The Central Water Authority has \ninformed the contractor on 05 September 2024 that delay damages of Rs10,000 daily will be \napplicable in line with sub-clause 46.1 of the condition of contract. No liquidated damage has \nbeen applied yet by the Central Water Authority. \nAs far as L’Agrément, St Pierre, Madam Speaker, I am informed that the distribution \nnetwork comprises asbestos concrete pipes along Mercedes Road and its lateral connections \nat St-Pierre. These pipes have exceeded their lifespan and need to be replaced. \nThe project started on 07 April 2024 with a scheduled completion date of 15 October \n2024. The supervision and assessment of the project were carried out by the Planning and \nDesign Department of the Central Water Authority. \nThat’s all. Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, we have a few minutes left. Third Member for Quartier \nMilitaire and Moka, your next question.  \nMr Venkatasami: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I B/33. \nMadam Speaker: Now, hon. Minister.  \nRÉDUIT TRIANGLE, STATE LAND – SOCIO-CULTURAL \nORGANIZATIONS – REMEDIAL ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/33",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 33,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands —",
      "question": "(No. B/33) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to State Land at Réduit Triangle \ninitially allocated to various socio-cultural organizations, he will state the remedial actions \nbeing envisaged by his Ministry for the settlement of the dispute thereon. \n\n66",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Thank you. I will try to be very quick. So, as I said earlier on when it \nwas my turn, Madam Speaker, plots of state land in Réduit Triangle were allocated to various \ngovernmental and non-governmental organisations, including 6 sociocultural organisations. \nThere was an application for state land on 22 June 2024 by Luxury Retirement Village Ltd. \nIn March 2023, if we follow the sequence of events, however, the then government decided \nto retrieve all undeveloped plots of state lands allocated in Réduit Triangle. The 6 social-\ncultural organisations, the status as of March 2023, were as follows – \n• \nMaharashtra Bhawan had been constructed on a plot of land allocated to the \nMauritius Marathi Mandali Federation; \n• \nA socio-cultural centre had been constructed on the plot of land allocated to the \nMauritius Sanatan Dharma Temples Federation, and \n• \nThe four plots of land allocated to the Hindi Speaking Union, Indo- Mauritian \nCatholic Association, and the Mauritius Tamil Cultural Centre Trust, as well as \nthe Urdu Speaking Union, were undeveloped.  \nIn April 2023, with a 48-hour’ notice to start construction over the leased plots of \nundeveloped land, the government had decided, following that 48-hour’ notice, to pull back \nthe lease and to cancel the lease of all those 4 plots of land. Following that, Madam Speaker, \nI am informed that there are court cases that are pending. In April 2024, there was a plaint \nwith summons, which was upon the Ministry of Housing and Land and the Ministry of Arts \nand Culture, and the co-defendant was the Mauritius Tamil Cultural Centre Trust. These \nplaintiffs in the plaint to summons claimed that they were beneficiaries of the Mauritius \nTamil Cultural Centre Trust, and as such, there was another case that was also entered by the \nIndo-Mauritian Catholic Association against my ministry back in July 2024. \nAs we speak, the letter of reservation, which was issued on 16 October of 2023 to \nLuxury Retirement Village over the plots of land that were retrieved from the Hindi Speaking \nUnion and the Urdu Speaking Union, and as it stands today, the plot has been fenced. In spite \nof the fact that it is only a letter of reservation and it does not mean that title has passed, the \nLuxury Retirement Village has fenced, in my view, wrongly the land allocated to it. And, as \nsuch, it has not even informed the Ministry of Housing and Land that it is fencing the place. \nThe plots of land, the state land retrieved from the Indo-Mauritian Catholic \nAssociation, and the Mauritius Tamil Cultural Centre Trust are, as we speak, still \n\n67 \n \nuncommitted and undeveloped. In the circumstances, I proposed to meet the representatives \nof the 4 organisations, meaning the Indo-Mauritian Catholic Association, the Mauritius Tamil \nCultural Centre Trust as well as the Hindi Speaking Union, and the Urdu Speaking Union, to \nfind the solution because there is a commitment that has been made before elections and after \nelections that those plots of land, if uncommitted and undeveloped, would be returned, and \nthis is what we are doing. We are sticking to our commitment, and we are returning those \nlands. We are going to embark upon discussions in order to find what would be the most \npractical way to do it.  \nI am also considering referring the matter to the hon. Attorney General’s Office. Why? \nIt is because part of the letter of reservation to Luxury Village makes reference to the fact that \nthey need to be informed in the event that the company wishes to raise capital through equity \nfinancing; prior written approval of the Ministry should be obtained, and such an issue of \ntransfer or shares shall be up to a maximum of 30%. \nSo, prior to issues of equity financing being raised, there needs to be a written \nauthorisation. Same was not done. As such, I am also aware that there have been negotiations \nwith the MIC and the State Bank by that same company to the tune of several hundred \nmillion rupees without the authorisation being sought first. There is, therefore, potentially \nanother violation of the letter of reservation. So, this matter will be referred to the Attorney \nGeneral’s Office with a view to seeking his advice on whether this letter of reservation can be \ncancelled, and if cancelled, in what way to be done in a lawful manner. \nThis is my answer, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Now, time is really up. But I have to \ninform you that a few questions have been withdrawn: PQs I B/2, I B/34, I B/35, and I B/36. \nHon. Members who have not reached their PQs can get written replies. You maintain you \nwant to remove it, hon. Jhummun? \nMr Jhummun: Yes, I want to remove it so that I can take it for the next session. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, and then you can come back, of course. No issues then!  \nSTATE SECONDARY ACADEMIES & REGIONAL SCHOOLS – GRADE 10 \nINTAKE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/34",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 34,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Riviére des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and’ Human Resource —",
      "question": "(No. B/34) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to State \n\n68 \n \nSecondary Academies and Regional Schools, he will state the yearly intake of boys and girls \nat Grade 10 level, respectively, since the implementation thereof to date, indicating if his \nMinistry proposes the phasing out thereof and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRIVIERE DES ANGUILLES DAM – CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/35",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 35,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Riviére des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities —",
      "question": "(No. B/35) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the Rivière \ndes Anguilles Dam, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water \nAuthority, information as to the – \n(a) \namount disbursed for the construction thereof to date, and \n(b) \ntimeframe for the completion of works thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 13 - DRAIN MAINTENANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/36",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 36,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Riviére des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure —",
      "question": "(No. B/36) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the maintenance \nof drains in Constituency No. 13, Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the Land Drainage Authority, information as to where matters \nstand therefor in view of the upcoming rainy season, indicating the amount disbursed since \nJanuary 2020 to date.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister, the floor is yours! \nSTATEMENT BY MINISTER \n (3.46 p.m.) \nMAURITIUS – STATE OF THE ECONOMY \nThe Prime Minister: Thank you, Madam Speaker. With your permission, I would like \nto make a Statement with regard to the State of the Economy. I will, of course, be tabling the \ndocument afterwards.  \n\n69 \n \nMadam Speaker, it is with great concern that I present the document to the House and \nto the nation. I say great concern because the previous government has left us an economy \nwhich is in an unprecedented state of precariousness.  \nThe legacy of the previous government is disastrous, to say the least. And the nation \nwill be appalled when they take cognisance of the way the previous government has \ndilapidated the finances of our country.  \nIt is shocking, Madam Speaker! They have fumbled and jumbled all the \nmacroeconomic fundamentals. The damages done to our socioeconomic and environmental \nfabric defy description. \nMadam Speaker, let me start with the macroeconomic fundamentals. Firstly, they have \ngrossly exaggerated the GDP growth rates to fool the population into believing that there is \nan economic boom. There is no such economic boom! In fact, it is the very opposite of what \nthey have said. It is now obvious that this was but a very dangerous political gimmick that \neventually sealed their fate.  \nA reassessment of the National Accounts by Statistics Mauritius has resulted in a \ndownward revision in GDP figures for every year since 2022. These downward revisions \nwere more pronounced in 2023 and 2024. \nThe nominal GDP for 2023 has been reduced by close to Rs22 billion – R 22 milliards, \nMadame la présidente – compared to data published in September 2024. Therefore, in real \nterms, the downward revision is 1.4%, which is a lot.  \nSimilarly, the forecast for nominal GDP for 2024 has been reduced by more than Rs36 \nbillion. R 36 millards! I do not know if hon. Members realise what all these figures mean. To \narrive at these inflated figures, it appears that the growth of the construction industry in \nparticular was deliberately overestimated. \nIndeed, the new assessment by Statistics Mauritius indicates that the GDP growth was \ndeliberately exaggerated by intimating that the construction industry would grow by 37.4% in \n2023 and 38.8% in 2024, as published in September 2024. These figures were manifestly \noverstated – I am putting it mildly! Statistics Mauritius has significantly lowered these \ngrowth rates to 21.3% and 25%, respectively.  \n\n70 \n \nThe previous government, Madam Speaker, has been boasting of high GDP growth \nrates in recent years. Let me stress that these GDP growth rates reflect the normal process of \npost-COVID recovery and in no way reflect any kind of new dynamism in the economy. \nIn fact, Mauritius has taken more time than its peers to recover from the COVID-related \nrecession. In 2023, the GDP in US dollars for Mauritius was still below its pre-pandemic \nlevel. \nSecondly, investment in our economy has been on a declining trend as a percentage of \nGDP during the past ten years.  \nMadam Speaker, one does not need to have a ‘Doctorat de la Sorbonne’ to know that \nlow investment means low growth. Any O-Level student on Economics knows that, Madam \nSpeaker!  \nYet, what do we see? The average annual investment rate has declined from 21.9% \nduring 2010-2014 to 18.5% during the period 2015-2023. The average annual private \ninvestment rate over the same period has also declined significantly from 16.6% to 14.1%. \nIn a country where more than 80% of wealth is generated by private enterprises, this \nlow private investment must be very worrying. The situation has been caused mostly by \nvisible deterioration in the public/private sector partnership. It is unthinkable how a \ngovernment can destroy one of the most important institutional strengths in our country’s \neconomic development.  \nMadam Speaker, this core strength has to be restored. \nThirdly, the trends in our external sector, that is, imports and exports and the balance of \npayments, have also been worsened by the pathetic mismanagement of the previous \ngovernment.  \nThe yearly average export of goods as a percentage of GDP has declined from 22.9% \nduring the period 2010-2014 to 17.4% during the period 2015 to 2023.  \nOn the other hand, the consumption-driven growth, that is, the model of the previous \ngovernment, has sharply increased imports.  \nAs a result, both the trends in trade and current accounts of the balance of payments \nhave deteriorated and are a source of great concern.  \n\n71 \n \nIn fact, the overall balance of payments, which has traditionally been in surplus, has \nregistered deficits in the last two years. It is no wonder, no wonder at all, that there is a severe \nshortage of foreign currency on the market and that there is pressure on the rupee to \ndepreciate. \nFourth, related to the fast depreciation of the rupee is the surge in the level of prices. \nOver the period 2022 to 2024, cumulative inflation in Mauritius was 23%.  \nOur record on inflation has been one of the worst when compared to other peer nations. \nThis signals a total failure of monetary policy and exchange rate management. While we \nwere cumulating an inflation rate of 23 percent, Seychelles, our neighbour next to us, had an \ninflation rate of only 2.4 percent. 23 percent compared to 2.4 percent! \nMadam Speaker, as we all know, the poor spend a greater share of their income on \nfood. Prices of food items have increased at a much higher rate than the average inflation \nrate. Cumulative food price inflation over the period 2022 to 2024 is more than 33 percent \ncompared to the inflation rate of 23 percent. In other words, the food inflation has been much \nmore. Therefore, it is no wonder that people have been complaining about the constant rise in \nthe price of food items, but the former Minister of Finance and the former Prime Minister did \nnot seem to care! They did not bother about it. Ils ont fait la sourde oreille. After all, it did \nnot affect them! \nFifth, the previous Government had one of the worst records in terms of employment \ncreation and labour market development. The employment level in 2023 was lower than in \n2019.  \nThe low employment rate combined with other major weaknesses in the labour market \nhas become a severe impediment to economic growth. For example, around 23 percent of the \nlabour force was underutilised in 2023, which includes skills-related and time-related \nunderemployment.  \nMoreover, only about 20 percent of our labour force has post-secondary education. \nThere is a persistent skills mismatch in the labour market, and employers keep complaining \nabout labour shortages in spite of the relatively high unemployment rate. \nMadam Speaker, our predicament does not end here.  \n\n72 \n \nSixth, the state of public finances has never been as disastrous and shaky as it is now. \nThe previous Government has literally dilapidated all the fiscal space of this country. There is \nabsolutely no room for manoeuvre. This is the legacy of the previous Government. They have \npracticed a policy of “terre brûlée”. As the French saying goes, Madam Speaker – \n« Après moi, le déluge. » \nThe budget deficit and the public sector debt figures were largely understated. They are, \nin fact, much higher than the population was made to believe. As regards the budget deficit \nfor the fiscal year 2023-2024, revenue was overestimated by Rs13.8 billion. Rs13.8 billion! \nThis was done to deliberately reduce the deficit. Yes, Rs13.8 billion! And after thorough \nanalysis of the figures, the actual budget deficit for 2023-2024 turned out to be much higher \nat 5.7 percent of GDP instead of 3.9 percent. I hope people realise we are talking about \npercentage of high figures, and 1.8 percent means a lot.  \nFor this fiscal year, that is, 2024-2025, revenue has been overestimated by Rs16.7 \nbillion while expenditure has been underestimated by Rs5 billion. As a result, the deficit \nwould increase by Rs21.7 billion. The budget deficit as a percentage of GDP is expected to \nbe 6.7 percent compared to the budget target, which was 3.4 percent.  \nEven worse, Madam Speaker, the borrowing requirements of Government is going \nthrough the roof. And we know that in the present context, borrowing requirement is the most \nrelevant indicator of sound public finances because it impacts directly on Government debt. \nThe updated borrowing requirements of Government work out to be Rs59.6 billion instead of \nRs38 billion estimated in the Budget. In other words, a difference of Rs21.6 billion, \nunderestimated! \nI must point out, Madam Speaker, that these figures are on a no-policy change. We are \nnot talking about the 14th month, fuel prices, or bonuses. This is as it is now, without any \npolicy change.  \nThe seventh and by far the biggest blunder of the previous Government is the huge \namount of debt it has accumulated through reckless expenditure on white elephant projects \nwith obvious sinister motive of lining the pockets of the well-known cronies. \n\n73 \n \nMadam Speaker, I would like to point out that when I was in office in 2014, the public \nsector debt ratio was under 60 percent. In fact, it was 59.5 percent. Today, it is well above 80 \npercent! This is above the statutory limit that the previous Government itself had targeted. \nUpdated data, in fact, shows that at the end of June 2024, the public debt ratio stood at 83.4 \npercent; well above 80 percent.  \nMauritian parents and grandparents have always seen to it that their responsibility to \ntheir children and grandchildren is to give them the best start possible in life. That is what \nparents and grandparents do. Yet, what has the previous Government done? It has been piling \nnational debt on the shoulders of the newborn babies.  \nIndeed, over the last ten years, the previous Government has added – believe it or not – \nRs321 billion to public sector debt. That is an average of Rs32 billion per year, which means \nevery newborn has a debt of about Rs500,000 as soon as he or she is born.  \nIncluded in the increase in debt are – \n• \nRs26.9 billion that the previous Government has had to pay as compensation in \nrelation to the ex-BAI, Betamax, and Neotown cases.  \n• \nRs19.8 billion resulting from the deliberate depreciation of the rupee.  \nMadam Speaker, our fiscal space has been totally constricted, the more so that all the \nSpecial Funds about which they would not answer questions in Parliament have been \ncompletely depleted.  \nBesides high public sector debt, our country is saddled with significant contingent \nliabilities. The list is very long, but let me enumerate just five of them – \n(i) \nMetro Express is unable to meet the cost of servicing its loan. Unable! And its \nloan is of Rs16 billion under the Line of Credit from India. Unable to do it! \n(ii) \nThe STC had a total deficit of Rs5.6 billion under the Subsidy Account and the \nPrice Stabilisation Account. \n\n74 \n \n(iii) As per the Companies Act 2001, Air Mauritius is deemed to be insolvent. Yes, \ninsolvent! They have recklessly destroyed our national pride. Insolvent! \n(iv) The Wastewater Management Authority is unable to pay its debts. Unable! It is \nalready in arrears of Rs2.2 billion and it has, on top of that, outstanding loans of \nRs3.5 billion. \n(v) \nThe Mauritius Post Ltd, the Casinos of Mauritius, the National Property Fund, \nCWA, and CEB, all of them are in deep financial stress. \nFurthermore, the Statutory Bodies defined pension funds have an actuarial deficit of \nRs47 billion. I can assure the House… \n(Interruptions) \nI can assure the House and the Nation… \nAn hon. Member: Incroyable! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, unbelievable!  \nBut I can assure the House, Madam Speaker, and the Nation that we will bring down \nthe public sector debt to a more sustainable and manageable level. And we will do so not only \nto balance the books or fix the figures, but most importantly, to relieve our children and \ngrandchildren from the burden of debt imposed on them by the previous Government. It is a \ndespicable act on future generation. It is a despicable crime. Ils ont hypothéqué l’avenir de \nnos jeunes ! Totalement ! \nMadam Speaker, our endeavour to deal with the catastrophic legacy inherited from the \nprevious government will be pursued amidst a number of challenges.   \nThe most pressing challenges are – \n• \nclimate change;  \n• \ndemographic trends;  \n\n75 \n \n• \nlabour market constraints and resource repurposing;  \n• \nrestoring the social partnership between Government, civil society, unions, and \nthe private sector; \n• \neducational reforms, which have already started; \n• \nsocial upliftment, and  \n• \ninstitutional reconstruction. \nMadam Speaker, let me end by giving the assurance to the population that this \nGovernment will turn around the situation and secure a better future for all and for the next \ngenerations as well.  \nThe top of our priorities will be to implement a credible Medium Term Fiscal \nConsolidation Plan. Our aim is to significantly reduce debt and contingent liabilities so as to \nminimise the risks to our debt sustainability and ensure medium-term macroeconomic \nstability. \nWe will rebuild the fiscal space while safeguarding critical social spending to protect \nthe most vulnerable. The Plan will also be towards growth promotion. The more we produce, \nthe more we can share. \nMadam Speaker, if we want to reclaim fiscal serenity, we need to aim at a primary \nfiscal balance and pave a pathway to a debt ratio of about 60 percent of GDP. It will be a \ntough challenge not only for Government but for the entire Nation. But we have done it \nbefore. We can do it again. \nMadam Speaker, we are not going to go it alone. We will have to work with \ndevelopment partners, international institutions, and friendly countries.  \nLet me reiterate that the previous government has fumbled and jumbled the economic \nfundamentals. Their mismanagement of the economy and their falsifying of figures have been \nan unmitigated disaster for our country. It borders on criminal negligence. It borders on that! \nTheir incompetence and irresponsibility are baffling. Difficult to understand! They have \nbeen practicing voodoo economics. That is what they have been doing – voodoo economics!  \n\n76 \n \nAnd they should be made to answer for their misdeeds. We cannot just note and then let it go. \nNo way! What they have done borders on criminal negligence.  \nMadame la présidente, nous sommes dans une tempête financière. Il faut d’abord \nredresser l’économie. That is the priority.  \nI shudder to think, Madam Speaker, what they would have done to our beloved country \nhad the people of this country not seen through their, what we should call, malevolent actions \nand given them another mandate. Do you realise what would have happened?  \nThere is a God for this country. God knows! We would have had to chant, “Cry our \nbeloved country” because this is what would have happened. They have tried not only to \ndestroy our unity; we have seen it during the campaign. Attacks on unity! The victory is one \nof unity for the last elections. People showed that they wanted to be unified. It was a victory \nfor unity. They tried to destroy not only our unity but also our institutions, our economy, and \nthe future of our youth. \nFortunately, not one of them got elected, as the people of this country in their wisdom \nhave consigned them to the dustbin of history, Madam Speaker. My two hon. friends, I must \nsay, are in a way elected because they got in as Best Loser. \nBut, Madam Speaker, never, never again should anyone be allowed to destroy our \ncountry as these people have done. Never again! \nWe will take up the challenge of tidying up the mess together as a nation, all of us \ntogether, but it will take time. \nMadam Speaker, there is no magic wand when you have seen the catalogue of what I \nhave just told you; there is no magician to pull us out of this economic quagmire, but, Madam \nSpeaker, history has taught us, ever since independence, that we have always been able to \novercome the daunting challenges that we have faced as a nation. We have always done so. \nToday, I stand in this House with confidence that, once again, we shall be able to rise \nup to this mammoth task ahead of us – as one people as one nation. \nThank you, Madam Speaker.   \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. \n\n77 \n \nMr Lesjongard: Madam Speaker, may I? \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Lesjongard: Madam Speaker, can I raise a point of order?  Because the Statement \nmade by the hon. Prime Minister falls under the item ‘Statements by Ministers’. Normally, I \nknow that it should not be controversial because we do not have a right to reply. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Let me… \nMr Lesjongard: Do I understand that now… \nAn hon. Member: Facts hurt! \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, let us listen and let me rule! \nMr Lesjongard: Yes. Do I understand that now Statement by Ministers can be \ncontroversial? \nMadam Speaker: I did not hear… \n(Interruptions) \nOkay, let me rule, please! \nI did not hear the Prime Minister attack any Member of Parliament. In Standing Order \n40, we have contents of speeches. It is only if he had attacked, let us say, one of you or \nanybody, then we could have said that it is not acceptable. I think what the Prime Minister \nhas done here – I have been a Member here for 15 years – this has been current. So, maybe it \nhurts a little bit. I would suggest… \n(Interruptions) \nI would suggest … \n(Interruptions) \nMay I speak, please? \n\n78 \n \nOf course, you cannot reply to what he is saying today. I would suggest, hon. Leader of \nthe Opposition, that there will be other instances; maybe you will get a chance to come back \non issues that have been raised. But I do not think we can condemn the Prime Minister on a \npoint of order. So, I will not allow this point of order. \nAdjournment! \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Tuesday 17 December 2024 at 11.30 a.m. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned.  \nAdjournment matters! \nMATTERS RAISED \n(4.12 p.m.) \nRODRIGUES HEALTH SERVICES – PHYSIOTHERAPISTS/PHYSIOTHERAPY \nASSISTANTS – RECRUITMENT \nMs M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues): Thank you, Madam Speaker, for \nallowing me to raise an important issue in this statement. Of particular concern to me and my \nconstituents is the present delivery of health services in Rodrigues, that this House do take \nnote that the population of Rodrigues is nearing 44,000. \nI am informed that at present, Rodrigues Island counts only one physiotherapist in \nservice together with four physiotherapy assistants who are on-the-job training in mainland \nMauritius. \nGiven the high number of patients requiring treatment for a broad spectrum of physical \nproblems and the like treatment, health promotion, and illness prevention, I call upon the \nrelevant authorities to respond urgently to remedy the situation, especially since the \nauthorities contemplate the recruitment of additional physiotherapists as well as additional \nphysiotherapy assistants at the earliest in the interest of the people of Rodrigues. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \n\n79 \n \nThe Minister of Health and Wellness (Mr A. Bachoo): May I respond? \nMadam Speaker: Yes. Do not give us too lengthy replies, please. \nMr Bachoo: No. I have taken note of your request and I will see to it that the needful \nbe done to provide additional therapists. \nMadam Speaker: Who has not spoken here? Je donne une chance à ceux qui n’ont \njamais parlé. Je crois, je ne suis pas sûre. Allez-y ! \nMARE D’AUSTRALIA – ADDITIONAL PRESSURE FILTER \nMr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil): Merci Madame. J’ai \nune demande à l’honorable Patrick Assirvaden. S’il pouvait demander à la CWA d’allouer un \ndeuxième pressure filter qui permettra de supply, comme on dit, 2500 m3 d’eau potable à \nMare d’Australia, puisque l’eau y est abondante et l’actuel pressure filter d’un volume de \n1200 m³ est insuffisant, donc un pressure filter additionnel permettra d’alimenter au moins un \ncinquième de la circonscription no 9. Merci. \nThe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities (Mr P. Assirvaden): Noted, Madam \nSpeaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr François! \n(4.14 p.m.) \nAIR MAURITIUS FLIGHTS – MAURITIUS-RODRIGUES – \nUNAVAILABILITY OF SEATS \nMr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues): Thank you, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker, the issue I am raising this afternoon is addressed to the hon. Prime \nMinister. So, in regard to the actual non-availability of seats on Air Mauritius flights on the \nMauritius-Rodrigues Mauritius route during this end-of-year period for our Rodriguan \nbrothers and sisters stranded patients here. Many patients have already been discharged from \nhospitals, and I am informed that they have been advised to wait until after mid-January to \nsecure a seat on Air Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker, you realise they are concerned about the situation while staying in \nhospitals without any accommodation or any financial support. You will also note that the \n\n80 \n \nCommission for Health of the Regional Assembly has been in default payment at a private \nhotel accommodation for our Rodriguan patients and accompaniers transferred to Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker, I would humbly request Dr. the hon. Prime Minister and the Prime \nMinister’s Office to intervene with Air Mauritius to schedule additional flights on \nhumanitarian ground to facilitate their repatriation either before Christmas or before New \nYear, which will also provide additional seats to many persons seeking to secure one. Thank \nyou. \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, if I may respond. I find what the hon. Member \nis saying shocking. Even on a humanitarian ground it is shocking. But this is what I have \nbeen saying; they destroyed Air Mauritius. This is probably the reason they cannot find a \nflight, whatever they do, but I will certainly look into it and make sure that they go home. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, there is one here, there is Dr. Aumeer, then Mrs \nSavabaddy; there are too many. We won’t be able to respect the time. Also, remember you \ncan put a question for next Tuesday; a real question. Okay? So, if it is urgent, I said. Young \nman here, I am sorry I can’t remember. \n(4.16 p.m.) \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 6 – WATER SHORTAGE \nMr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d’Or): Madam Speaker, \nthank you. My request is addressed to the hon. Minister of Energy and Public Utilities. There \nhas been an acute problem of water shortage for several months in my Constituency No. 6, \nespecially in Goodlands, Grand Gaube, Vale, Fond du Sac, Petit Raffray, Calodyne, Grand \nBaie, and Cap Malheureux. So, I request the hon. Minister to address this issue, please. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nThe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities (Mr P. Assirvaden): Noted, Madam \nSpeaker. \n(4.17 p.m.) \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 9 – DRAINS & RIVERS – CLEANING \nMr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil): Madam Speaker, \nmy request is addressed to the hon. Minister of National Infrastructure. I make a humble \n\n81 \n \nrequest to the hon. Minister in regard to the highly flood-prone village of Poste de Flacq in \nConstituency No. 9, that needful be made for the dredging of rivers and cleaning of drains as \nsoon as possible. I would like to point out that the hon. Prime Minister did a site visit six \nmonths before and insisted that these tasks be done regularly. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Minister, are you taking note? \nThe Minister of National Infrastructure (Mr G. Gunness): I take note. I am sure \nthat my hon. friend knows that we had a meeting with the local authorities for the cleaning of \ndrains and rivers. \nMadam Speaker: Good! Now, Dr. Aumeer! \n(4.17 p.m.) \nSOREZE – AVENUE ROUGET & LA BONITE LANE – DESTROYED ROADS – \nREPAIRS \nDr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central): My \nrequest is addressed to the hon. Minister of National Infrastructure. It is regarding Avenue \nRouget and La Bonite Lane in Sorèze, Pailles, whereby the roads have been completely \ndestroyed since Cyclone Belal, making it even difficult for people to have access to their \nresidence. I would urge you to see if your Ministry can see to it at least now that you have a \nnew Government, repairs are started. \nThe Minister of National Infrastructure (Mr G. Gunness): I take note. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \n(4.18 p.m.) \nMARE D’ALBERT SWIMMING POOL – DEPLORABLE STATE \nMr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien): Je m’adresse \nau ministre de la Jeunesse et des sports concernant l’état déplorable de la piscine de Mare \nd’Albert, surtout en cette période de vacances où les enfants n’ont pas pu profiter de cette \nfacilité. Donc, je demande au ministre si le nécessaire peut être fait très rapidement. Merci. \n\n82 \n \nThe Minister of Youth and Sports (Mr D. Nagalingum): I take good note, hon. \nMember. A meeting is scheduled for next Thursday and you can accompany hon. Members \nfor the Constituency. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \n(4.18 p.m.) \nCONSTITUENCY NO.4 – SHORTAGE OF WATER SUPPLY \nMrs A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne Longue): \nThank you, Madam Speaker. Humble request to the hon. Minister of Public Utilities, hon. \nPatrick Assirvaden. Nous avons dans la circonscription de gros problèmes en ce qui concerne \nla fourniture et la distribution en eau sachant que durant ces cinq dernières années, il y a eu \nun Senior Minister qui occupait ce même poste mais malheureusement, la situation est restée \ninchangée et on compte sur vous pour résoudre ce problème. Merci.  \nThe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities (Mr P. Assirvaden): Madame la \nprésidente, c’est noté. \nMadam Speaker: Très bien. Il y avait qui encore ?  \n(4.19 p.m.) \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 13 – BUS SERVICE REVIEW  \nMr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac): My \nquestion is addressed to the hon. Minister of Land Transport. Can we review the timings, the \nduration, and the time that they have to wait in my constituency from Bois Chéri, Grand Bois, \nand La Flora for bus services in the morning as well as the evening, including Benares and \nBatimarais? Thank you. \nThe Minister of Land Transport (Mr Osman Mahomed): Yes, Madam Speaker, I \ntake note of the concern raised by the hon. Member and I will look into it. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, there was someone on this side? Yes! \n(4.20 p.m.) \nMONTAGNE BLANCHE POLYTECHNICS – 3 CREDITS CRITERIA \n\n83 \n \nMr R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE): My question is \naddressed to the hon. Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research. I want to know \nabout the reform coming for education, the status of three credits to be admitted to HSC, and \nwhat about the standing of the Polytechnics of Montagne Blanche, which was initially a \nproject of the previous Government meant for tertiary education, whether he will stand as we \nare meant together to have many more students at HSC levels? Thank you. \nThe Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research (Dr. K. Sukon): In fact, \nwe are asking each one of them what capacity they are using and I will come back. I \nunderstand that we do have spare capacity that can be used for running other programmes. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you everybody! Last question! \n(4.20 p.m.) \nCITÉ CIM, RIVIERE DU REMPART – RESTRICTED ACCESS – FIRE \nSERVICES & AMBULANCES \nDr S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart): Thank you, Madam \nSpeaker. My request is addressed to the hon. Minister of Youth and Sports. We have an issue \nwith Cité CIM of Rivière du Rempart where access is very restricted to fire services and \nmaybe even ambulances because of the football ground’s wall, so I will request an urgent \nvisit with our colleagues, MPs, and Ministers of the Constituency to remedy the situation. \nThank you. \nThe Minister of Youth and Sports (Mr D. Nagalingum): I take good note. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. May I just remind Members that if you want to send \nquestions, you have until tomorrow 2 p.m. to send your questions? And now, we discussed \nduring lunchtime, we have agreed that there will be a tirage au sort, but it will be done in a \nvery strict and serious fashion, okay? So, don’t forget, before 2 o’clock, because some of you \nhaven’t reached your questions, you see, so we will have to give a chance to everyone. \nThank you very much. \nAt 4.23 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 17 December 2024 \nat 11.30 a.m. \n \n\n84 \n \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nFOND DU SAC – CUT-OFF DRAINS – CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/37",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 37,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure —",
      "question": "(No. B/37) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the construction of cut-off \ndrains in the region of Fond du Sac, he will state – \n(a) \nthe work progress thereof, and  \n(b) \nif any survey has been effected to assess the risks of flooding in view of the \nforthcoming heavy rain and cyclonic seasons.",
      "answer": "Reply: The National Development Unit awarded a contract to Square Deal \nMultipurpose Cooperative Society on 30 April 2019 for the implementation of the project \n‘Drainworks at Fond Du Sac’ for an amount of Rs103,850,002.50. \nThe scope of works comprised the following – \na) \nconstruction of a 2 metres high floodwall over 700 metres; \nb) \nconstruction and upgrading of a swale 3 metres deep and 18 metres wide over a \nlength of 1.3 kilometres; \nc) \nconstruction of a masonry lined drain over 400 metres; \nd) \nconstruction of a flood retardation basin of capacity 83,000 m3 upstream of cut-\noff drain with a flow regulation structure at outlet, and \ne) \nconstruction of culverts over swale, across Forbach Road and Fond du Sac Main \nRoad – B11 Road. \nWorks started on 23 May 2019 and were scheduled for completion by 23 November \n2020. The works were delayed due to lockdowns in 2020 and 2021, land acquisition issues, \nbad weather and relocation of services. \nAs at December 2021, works were completed except for a stretch of 260 metres stone \nmasonry drain at the downstream section of the project due to land acquisition issues. The \nland acquisition was completed in May 2022. In April of the same year, the contractor \ninformed that it would not continue with the project due to major increase in prices following \nthe COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021 and since land acquisition was not completed.  \nConsequently, it was decided to appoint a new contractor to undertake the construction \nof the 260 metres of masonry drain. The updated estimated cost for the completion works is \nRs33 m. \n\n85 \n \nBids for appointment of a new Contractor to complete the outstanding 260 metres drain \nwere invited on 20 January 2023. Bid evaluation was completed in April 2023. However, the \nprocurement exercise had to be cancelled on 25 August 2023 due to delay in obtaining \nfinancial clearance. \nBids for appointment of a new contractor to complete the 260 metres masonry drain \nwere invited afresh on 12 December 2023 with closing date of 10 January 2024. However, \nsince only one bid, which was 86.6% higher than the estimated project cost, was received, the \nbidding exercise was not successful. \nIn order to avoid a further procurement being unsuccessful, it was decided to undertake \nthe project under the new Framework Agreement for Roads which was awarded on 19 \nJanuary 2024. However, since the estimated project cost exceeded the threshold for direct \nissue of Works Order under the new Framework Agreement, a mini competition was required \nto be undertaken. However, the services of the consultant had to be stopped due to request for \nincrease in fees for preparation of bidding documents. As at date, bids for appointment of \nconsultant are under evaluation following which a contractor will be appointed for the \ncompletion works. The construction period for the outstanding drain is expected to be 6 \nmonths. \nIn order to avoid flooding at the downstream end of the village due to the outstanding \n260 metres drain, cleaning of the temporary earth drain, excavated in June 2022 along the \nalignment of the 260 metres outstanding drain, was effected by the District Council of \nPamplemousses in February 2024. Pending completion of the 260 metres outstanding drain, \nthe District Council of Pamplemousses has been requested to undertake regular cleaning of \nthe earth drain. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, the drain works completed so far are functional \nto safeguard the region of Fond du Sac. \n \nGRAND BAY & PEREYBÈRE – WETLANDS – CONSTRUCTION \nPROJECTS – BUILDING & LAND USE PERMITS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/38",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 38,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government —",
      "question": "(No. B/38) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Building and Land Use \nPermits issued for construction projects in wetlands in the region of Grand Bay and \nPereybère, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe criteria established for the allocation thereof, and  \n\n86 \n \n(b) \nif any survey has been carried out by the relevant authorities prior to the \nallocation thereof in each case.",
      "answer": "Reply: I wish to inform the House that all applications for Building and Land Use \nPermits are submitted and processed on the National Electronic Licensing System since 2018. \nAs per the Local Government Act, every application for a Building and Land Use Permit \nmust be in accordance with the following enactments and any guidelines issued thereunder – \n(i) \nthe Construction Industry Authority Act;  \n(ii) \nthe Town and Country Planning Act; \n(iii) the Planning and Development Act; \n(iv) the Environment Act; \n(v) \nthe Mauritius Fire and Rescue Service Act;  \n(vi) the Climate Change Act, and  \n(vii) any other enactment as may be prescribed.  \nAs regards wetlands, these are identified in the Development Management Map of the \nOutline Planning Schemes issued by the Town and Country Planning Board to all Local \nAuthorities and on the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map issued by the Ministry of \nEnvironment, Solid Waste Management, and Climate Change. The Environmental Sensitive \nAreas Map for the northern region shows all wetlands that have been surveyed and this \nincludes the region of Grand Bay and Pereybère. \nI am informed by the District Council of Riviere du Rempart that whenever an \napplication for a Building and Land Use Permit is received, verification is made as to whether \nthe site of the proposed development falls within a wetland or its buffer of 30 m. \nWhere an application falls within a wetland or its buffer, same is referred to the \nNational Ramsar Committee at the Ministry of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy \nand Fisheries. \nThe National Ramsar Committee then forwards the application to the National Parks \nand Conservation Services which conducts site visits with all stakeholders which include \nrepresentatives from the Ministry of Housing and Lands, the Ministry of Environment, Solid \nWaste Management and Climate Change, the Ministry of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue \nEconomy and Fisheries and the National Parks and Conservation Service. Thereafter, the \nNational Parks and Conservation Service submits its report to the National Ramsar \nCommittee for consideration. \n\n87 \n \nAfter consideration, the National Ramsar Committee submits its recommendations to \nthe Local Authority concerned for further processing. In case an unfavourable \nrecommendation is received, the application is turned down. \nRegarding part (b) of the question, as I have already indicated, site visits are carried out \nby the National Parks and Conservation Service with all stakeholders prior to recommending \nany application for Building and Land Use Permit.",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/39",
      "sitting_id": "10-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-10",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 39,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Intergration and International Trade —",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional\nIntergration and International Trade —\n\nWhether, in regard to the ongoing occupation of Palestine by\nIsraelis armed forces, he will state if he will consider\n(a) issuing a statement to reaffirm the position of Mauritius and\n(b) joining like-minded countries to put an end to the bombings\nand suffering of the civil population in Gaza?\n\nNavin Gopall\nActing Clerk of the National Assembly\n\nParliament House\n\nPort Louis\n06 December 2024\n\neZ, Le udeadeueshesdheadheaheuheuheuheuheaheuheauheuheushdeusheuhuhdeuheuheudesbeuheuuhdeueuhudeududeudeududududsudteudtudtudtudtudiuuudtudtudtudtudtada\nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius: Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364\nEmail : clerk@govmu.org Web site : http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/40",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 40,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/40) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to barristers \nand attorneys of the private practice whose services were retained by the former \nCommissioner of Police, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner \nof Police, information as to the – \n(a) \nnames thereof, and \n(b) \namount of fees paid thereto.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, it has always, always been the practice before \n2015 for the Police to be represented either by the Attorney General’s Office in any court \n\n19 \n \nproceeding or the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) to undertake criminal \nproceedings before any court of law. That was always the case before 2015. \nI am informed by the Commissioner of the Police that from August 2021 to \nNovember 2024, the former Commissioner of Police departed from usual practice and \ndecided he would retain the services of five Counsels and one Attorney from the private \npractice in eight cases for an amount totalling Rs14,288,825.30, and the names are as follows, \nMadam Speaker – \n(i) \nMr Amar Oozeer, Counsel, received Rs34,500 inclusive of vat; \n(ii) \nMr Desire Basset, Senior Counsel: Rs2,991,437.50 inclusive of vat; \n(iii) \nMr Yashley Reesaul, Counsel: Rs86,250 again inclusive of vat; \n(iv) \nMr Ravi Raj Yerrigadoo, Counsel: Rs603,750 inclusive of vat; \n(v) \nMrs Shamila Sonah-Ori, Attorney: Rs4,330,000 inclusive of vat, and \n(vi) \nOne King’s Counsel from the United Kingdom: Rs5,521,447.56 plus an \namount of Rs721,440.25 for his accommodation and air tickets. \nI should also say, Madam Speaker, that previously, if ever there was a Counsel from \nthe UK, especially for cases that go to the Privy Council afterwards, he was put up under \nGovernment bungalows at no cost. Why were Rs721,000 spent here? I am a bit puzzled, to \nsay the least. \nMadam Speaker, our country has a well-established democratic system with clear \nseparation of powers between the Executive, the Judiciary and the Legislative. Institutions \nlike the Attorney General’s Office and the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions \noperate in full independence and have always been providing legal advice to the Public \nSector, including the Police, free of charge – absolutely free of charge – because this forms \npart of their professional duties. \nThe practice of hiring the services of private lawyers and bypassing the Attorney \nGeneral’s Office and the Office of the DPP by the former Commissioner of Police under the \nprevious Government, as I said, cost the taxpayers Rs14,288,825.30 and this has been clearly \ndone to undermine the professional integrity of the Office of the Director of Public \nProsecutions and relevant institutions, and this should be severely condemned. \n\n20 \n \nMadam Speaker, it is clear the previous Government had a problem with an \nindependent Director of Public Prosecutions. Who can forget this unbelievable attempt to try \nto arrest the former DPP? He had to run away from his home; his wife had to pull the door \nbecause they were trying to force their way in to arrest him, and he had to go through a back \ndoor and go to a Judge in Chambers to get protection. \nThis is what happened under the government of the MSM! This was unprecedented! It \nhas never happened in any Commonwealth countries – never happened! But you know, with \nthe MSM, everything is possible. This is why I speak of Murphy’s Law – what will not \nhappen will happen. This is Murphy’s Law. \nIt was, in fact, to my mind, a much broader Machiavellian strategy to undermine the \nindependence and integrity of our institutions with the sinister motive of exerting absolute \ncontrol over them. \n Over the past decade, they undermined with ruthless propensity the credibility of all \nour institutions, just like tinpot dictators, hell-bent on transforming the country into a rogue \nstate. This is what we call “l’État voyou”. \nThey planted their toadies in most of the important institutions of our country, and these \ntoadies were at the beck and call of their masters, doing their bidding. \nLet me assure the House and the population at large that we will not condone such \npractices – nobody on this side! The public expects our institutions, including the law \nenforcement agencies, to act in total independence and transparency and remain accountable \nto restore the confidence of the people of this country in them and to restore the respect of the \ninternational community as well.  \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Third Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d’Or! \nSTATISTICS - ALLEGED FALSIFICATION - ENQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/41",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 41,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/41) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to cases of \nalleged falsification of statistics in the recent years thereby projecting a different state of the \n\n21 \n \neconomy, he will state if consideration will be given for the setting up of an enquiry \nthereinto.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, indeed, it is abundantly clear that most statistics \nhave been deliberately falsified in order to create an illusion of an economic boom in the \ncountry. This deliberate manipulation of the macroeconomic figures has severely damaged \nthe credibility of our institutions responsible for collecting and disseminating statistics in the \ncountry.  \nMadam Speaker, Moody’s latest publication came out yesterday, 16 December, and it \nmakes reference to this unprecedented practice. \nThe House would recall that the June 2021 Issue of Economic and Social Indicators on \nthe National Accounts Estimates was published on 28 June 2021. Two days later, that is, on \n30 June 2021, a revised Issue of National Accounts Estimates was published. So, between the \ntwo publications, the GDP growth figures were increased from 4.4% to 5.4%, a full one \nhundred basis points over just two days. This is evidence of manipulation!  \nThe previous Chairman of the Statistics Board, a highly competent professional in the \nprivate sector, was asked to manipulate the figures. He refused! He refused to be part of the \nfalsification of figures, and he said he would rather resign, which he did. But he refused to do \nit, and he should be applauded for this.  \nAfter his resignation, Mr Charles Cartier was appointed as Chairperson of the Statistics \nBoard on 29 November 2021 for a period of three years. He has just resigned on 18 \nNovember 2024. \nMadam Speaker, the exercise we have carried out on the State of the Economy has \nunearthed some of the despicable falsehoods that the previous Government was propagating.  \nWe have already initiated actions to repair the damage done by the previous \nGovernment. \nFurthermore, we are envisaging a serious restructuring of Statistics Mauritius with a \nview to restoring its credibility and also its reputation and its independence. We must ensure \nthat such blatant manipulation is not resorted to by any government.  \n\n22 \n \nAs for the setting up of the enquiry, I must say I am looking at it very, very closely \nbecause I think this might be the best way to prevent such a despicable practice. That is what \nI had to say. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. First Member for Savanne & Black River! \nPROPERTY DEVELOPMENT SCHEME – FUNDS ALLOCATED – 2014 TO 2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/42",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 42,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/42) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Property \nDevelopment Scheme, he will state the amount of funds allocated to social projects \nthereunder for the past 10 years as provided for in Regulation 10(1) of the Investment \nPromotion (Property Development Scheme) Regulations 2015.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the House will recall that in 2007, mandatory \nsocial programs were introduced for projects under the Integrated Resort Scheme.  \nThese programs required developers to contribute Rs200,000 per residential property \nsold in order to contribute to the social and economic upliftment of the neighbouring \ncommunity where the project is implemented. \nIn 2009, following the implementation of the Corporate Social Responsibility, what we \ncall CSR, IRS promoters were given the option to implement a CSR programme, finance an \napproved NGO or remit their contributions to the National Empowerment Foundation (NEF). \nIn 2015, when the Property Development Scheme was introduced to replace the \nprevious schemes, a social contribution of Rs200,000 per residential unit sold was \nmaintained. However, Regulation 10(1) of the Economic Development Board (Property \nDevelopment Scheme) Regulations 2015 required that the promoters use their contributions \nfor the financing of social programmes identified by a social needs analysis, carried out, \nunfortunately, by the promoters themselves for the neighbouring community.  \nBut as from 20 April 2024, Regulation 10 was amended to provide for the contributions \nof promoters to be credited to the National Resilience Fund. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the Economic Development Board that since the \nintroduction of the Property Development Scheme, 63 projects have been issued with a \n\n23 \n \ncertificate comprising 3,006 residential units, of which 1,093 have been sold. This represents \na contribution of Rs218.6 million. \nI am also informed by the Economic Development Board that as of date, out of the \nsocial contribution of Rs218.6 million – \n(a) \naround Rs129.6 million has been spent on social projects by the promoters \nthemselves, and \n(b) \nRs9.7 million has been transferred to the National Resilience Fund. \nTherefore, unspent social contribution of around Rs80 million is not accounted for at \nthis point. There is no clear indication of where the sum of Rs80 million is. The Economic \nDevelopment Board has been asked to look into it.  \nGovernment is in the process of completely reviewing the operations of the Economic \nDevelopment Board and this will include the way the Property Development Scheme has \nbeen implemented over the years. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES, PLAINE CORAIL AIRPORT – NEW RUNAWAY CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/43",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 43,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/43) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the construction of a \nnew runaway at the Plaine Corail Airport in Rodrigues, he will state – \n(a) \nthe terms and conditions of the financing Agreement thereof signed with the \nWorld Bank, and  \n(b) \nwhere matters stand, indicating the expected starting date thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Acting Financial \nSecretary that the Rodrigues Airport Project has four components which is estimated to cost \naround USD 200 million. \nThe project will be financed by a loan of USD 184 million from the World Bank and a \ngrant of Euros 15.7 million from the European Union. \n\n24 \n \nThe four components of the project are as follows – \n• \nFirst, an amount of USD 170 million has been earmarked for infrastructure \ndevelopment, including the construction of a new airport runway, a new control \ntower, a meteorological building, and a rescue and fire-fighting station; \n• \nSecond, USD 10 million for technical assistance to support the project \nimplementation and aviation sector development; \n• \nThird, another USD 10 million for technical assistance and small investments to \nsupport Rodrigues’ Sustainable Integrated Development with a focus on access to \nwater and food security, and finally \n• \nFourth, USD 10 million for technical assistance for the Sustainable Development \nof Rodrigues’ Tourism Sector.  \nMadam Speaker, regarding part (a) of the question, it is a long answer; I am tabling the \ninformation requested by the hon. Member.  \nAs at date, no disbursement has been effected from the loan and the grant components. \nAs for part (b) of the question, Madam Speaker, I am informed that the draft tender \ndocuments were sent to the World Bank on 30 October 2024 for review. The World Bank has \nsubmitted its comments on 15 November 2024. Airports of Mauritius Ltd is presently \nworking with GIBB (Mauritius) Ltd, the project consultant, to amend the tender documents to \nreflect the comments of the Bank. Once finalised, the document will be resubmitted to the \nWorld Bank for its consideration.  \nThereafter, Airports of Mauritius Ltd would seek approval of its Board and \nsubsequently of Government prior to the floating of tender for the construction works of the \nrunway and other airport-related facilities. Tender is expected to be launched around January \nnext year with closing of bids around April 2025. Contract will then be awarded, hopefully, \nin July 2025 with a work duration of 42 months as planned to start in October 2025. The \nproject is expected to be completed around April 2029. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil!  \n \n\n25 \n \nNATIONAL ASSEMBLY - FORMER SPEAKER - OFFICIAL MISSIONS (19 JULY- \n04 OCT 2024)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/44",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 44,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/44) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to official missions \nundertaken by the former Speaker of the National Assembly between 19 July 2024 to 04 \nOctober 2024, he will state the – \n(a) \nnumber thereof, and  \n(b) \nrelated expenses incurred therefor.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the former Speaker of the National Assembly \nwas elected on 18 July 2024. He submitted his resignation on 05 October 2024, that is, one \nday after the dissolution of the National Assembly. During that period of 78 days – I must say \nI was surprised it was only 78 days; he did so much damage in 78 days? – he chaired four \nsittings of the National Assembly and undertook three official missions – \n(i) \nA visit to the Lok Sabha, New Delhi, from 16 to 17 August 2024; \n(ii) \nThe 2024 Interregional Seminar on the Achievement of the Sustainable \nDevelopment Goals for Parliaments of Developing Countries in China from 18 \nto 24 August 2024, and \n(iii) \nThe \n10th \nInter-Parliamentary \nUnion \nGlobal \nConference \nof \nYoung \nParliamentarians held in Armenia from 12 to 14 September 2024. \nMadam Speaker, as for part (b) of the question, the total amount spent was Rs748,112 \nfor three missions in 78 days, as I said. \nAn hon. Member: Shocking! \nMadam Speaker: The Hon. Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka, please. \nGRA – LEGAL ADVISER/S & SENIOR ADVISER, MR D. B.  – FEES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/45",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 45,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/45) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \n\n26 \n \nGambling Regulatory Authority, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, \ninformation as to – \n(a) \nthe name of the legal adviser/s thereof from 2019 to date and fees payable thereto, \nand \n(b) \nif Mr D. B., former Senior Adviser at the Prime Minister’s Office, was a board \nmember thereof, indicating – \n(i)  \nthe dates thereof, and  \n(ii) total amount of money paid thereto.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: As regards part (a) of the question, I am informed by the \nGambling Regulatory Authority that since 2019, the services of legal advisers retained by the \nAuthority and the fees paid to them are as follows – \n(i)  \nMr Ravi Yerrigadoo from May 2019 to date was paid Rs4,009,600 including a \nfixed monthly retainer fee of Rs46,000 that he was going to get anyway; \n(ii) \nMrs Saya Ragavoodoo from May 2019 to date was paid Rs1,447,825, and \n(iii) \nMr Krishnakantsing Auchoybur from February 2022 to November 2024 was \npaid Rs4,555,570 including again a monthly fee of Rs130,000. \nI am further informed that he was assigned the duties of Head of the Horse Racing \nDivision on a temporary basis by the Gambling Regulatory Board. In this capacity, he was \nalso paid a total allowance of Rs2,339,992, that is, since February 2022, which makes for a \ntotal of Rs6,925,562. I am also informed that he has resigned on 10 December 2024. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) (i) of the question, I am informed that Mr \nKreedeo Beekharry, also known as Mr Dev Beekharry, former Senior Adviser at the Prime \nMinister's Office, was a Board Member of the Gambling Regulatory Authority since 13 \nMarch 2015. He was also appointed Vice-Chairperson of the Gambling Regulatory Board as \nfrom 14 January 2022. \nI am further informed that Mr Dev Beekharry has resigned as a Board Member of the \nGambling Regulatory Board on 12 November 2024. \n\n27 \n \nRegarding part (b) (ii) of the question, Mr Dev Beekharry was paid a total amount of \nRs3,334,000 including, again, a monthly fee of Rs60,000 as Board Member and Vice-\nChairperson of the Gambling Regulatory Authority.  \nMadam Speaker: The Hon. Second Member for Rodrigues. \nRODRIGUES – SMALL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS (INDIAN GRANTS) – \nPROJECT STATUS & COST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/46",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 46,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr Francois)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/46) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the amount of Rs19 \nmillion earmarked in the 2024/2025 budget under the Small Development Projects (Indian \nGrants) for Rodrigues, he will state where matters stand as to the works/projects carried out \nthereunder as at date, indicating in each case the – \n(a) \ncontracts, if any, allocated thereunder; \n(b) \ncost thereof, and \n(c) \nexpected completion date thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, on 19 January 2022, a Memorandum of \nUnderstanding was signed between the Government of India and the Government of \nMauritius for financial assistance amounting to Rs400 million for the implementation of \ncommunity projects in Mauritius, Rodrigues, and Agaléga.  \nOut of the amount of Rs400 million, a budgetary provision of Rs19 million has been \nallocated under the Small Development Projects – Indian Grant for the implementation of \nseveral projects in Rodrigues for the infrastructural and sustainable development of the \nisland. \nMadam Speaker, as regards parts (a), (b), and (c) of the question, I am tabling the \ninformation requested by the hon. Member because it is a very long answer. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister! \nMr François: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Madam Speaker, I am thankful to the \nGovernment of India for the Small Development Projects for Rodrigues and the disaster risk \n\n28 \n \nreduction, renewable energy and especially community development. As we are in a cyclonic \nperiod and in Rodrigues, during the last cyclone, Bheki, out of 90 community and refugee \ncentres, only 33 were operational, and 10 of them have been removed from the list. \nMy question is: will the hon. Prime Minister, also responsible for Finance, be agreeable \nto further negotiate with India for the extension of this Indian Grant for Rodrigues in relation \nto community development to upgrading and uplifting additional community and refugee \ncentres thereat, as Rodrigues has been in a situation of reckless non-construction of not a \nsingle housing unit for potential vulnerable persons for the past few years? \nThe Prime Minister: I am actually quite shocked by what you are saying, but I will \ncertainly look into that. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Now, we have the hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues. \nSSR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – DEPARTURE LOUNGE FOR RODRIGUES – \nDROP OFF AREA",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/47",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 47,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/47) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Island whether, in regard to the domestic \ndeparture terminal for Rodrigues at the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether access to the drop off at \nthe external doors thereat is closed to passengers’ vehicles and, if so, the reasons therefor, \nindicating if he will use his good office to request the relevant authority to extend \naccessibility to vehicles during drop off.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by Airport Terminal Operations \nLtd that the area adjacent to the external doors of the Domestic Departure Lounge for \nRodrigues was not designed as a drop off area. In fact, this area of an extent of about 2,560 \nm2 was designed for use as a parking area with 44 slots, out of which 35 are rented to \nauthorised tour operators. Seven parking slots are used by the airport authorities, such as the \nPolice and the Mauritius Revenue Authority, etc. The remaining two slots are reserved for \nvehicles transporting crew members. \nI am also informed that passengers departing to Rodrigues can access the Domestic \nLounge through either the elevated roadway at Departure Level 1 using either the \n\n29 \n \nlift/staircase or the pick-up/drop-off platform. However, vehicles transporting individuals \nwith disabilities are given direct access to the domestic lounge.  \nThe request of the hon. Member is being referred to the Board of Airport Terminal \nOperations Ltd for them to reconsider. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, the hon. Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral. \nFORENSIC SCIENCE LABORATORY – STAFFING & CASE FILES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/48",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 48,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/48) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Forensic Science Laboratory, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ntherefrom, information as to the – \n(a) \ncurrent staffing thereof, and \n(b) \nnumber of cases referred thereto since the last 3 years, indicating the number \nwhich are – \n(i) \nstill pending; \n(ii) \nrelated to drugs, and \n(iii) \nawaiting DNA analysis.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that during the past \n10 years, the Forensic Science Laboratory has been functioning in a very inefficient and \nineffective manner. This has led to delays in the submission of FSL reports, which has \nimpacted, of course, the submission of case files to the Office of the Director of the Public \nProsecutions. The FSL has scientists who analyse evidence from scenes of crime, suspects \nand victims. They analyse DNA from fingerprints, human remains, and also suspicious \nsubstances. It has, therefore, an essential role to play in evidence-based criminal \ninvestigations. \nThe former Director who retired from the civil service in February 2023, was \nreappointed on contract for a period of two years. Her contract was terminated as of \n\n30 \n \n26 November 2024, and it is the senior-most Chief Forensic Scientist who has been assigned \nthe duties of Director. \nMadam Speaker, the House may wish to note that following several complaints from \nvarious institutions, I undertook a project for the revamping of the FSL. In this respect, the \nsupport of a foreign expert was sought as Director in October 2010. As soon as she assumed \nduty, she was systematically harassed; she was threatened. She claims she thinks she was \npoisoned. Fearing for her security, she preferred to resign in October 2011. But she did tell \nme that the way this is being run, we won’t get results; we will never get results. \nMadam Speaker, for the post of Director, the incumbent will have to be a high-calibre \nprofessional, preferably with international exposure in the field of forensic science, together \nwith a combination of leadership and administrative skills. He or she will have to be assisted \nby a Deputy Director. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Acting \nDirector that the total current staffing stands at 71, including 51 who are technical staff.  \nAs regards part (b) (i) of the question, the Acting Director of Forensic Science \nLaboratory has stated that from January 2022 to November 2024, out of a total of 44,710 \ncases referred to the Forensic Science Laboratory, 39,836 cases have been completed and \n4,874 are still pending. \nWith regard to parts (b) (ii) and (iii) of the question, I am informed that 3,640 drug-\nrelated cases are still pending since December 2023 and 500 samples are awaiting DNA \nanalysis since August of this year. \nMadam Speaker, it is clear that we need to ensure that the institution is restructured to \nrestore its credibility and professionalism as an independent one forming an integral part of \nthe criminal justice system. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. I have five minutes left for this PMQT. Yes, hon. Dr. \nAumeer, please! \nDr. Aumeer: Can I ask the hon. Prime Minister whether he can inform the House if he \nhas been made aware of very suspicious information of interference at a very high level \n\n31 \n \nwithin the FSL as to corroborate results of DNA to match those of suspects in police custody \nin what was termed as “cases of planting”, particularly Mr A.K. and Mr B.L.? \nThe Prime Minister: I heard about this from people, but we are going to have to look \ninto this if that is so. That is a very, very grave accusation if that is actually what happened. \nBut if you see what I was telling you about the lady whom I got from Staffordshire \nUniversity from a Mauritian, Dr. Ram Gopal, who did not take any fees from us, as far as I \nremember. He wanted to help Mauritius and he advised that we take this lady, Mrs Maclean \nwho came as Director of FSL. From what she told me, I am not surprised that this could well \nhave happened, but we are going to investigate it. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac! \nMAURITIAN RUPEE – DEPRECIATION/DEVALUATION – FOREIGN \nCURRENCIES INJECTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/49",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 49,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Riviére des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/49) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the depreciation/devaluation of the Mauritian Rupee since 2014, he will – \n(a) \nstate the number of times the relevant Authorities have intervened thereon, and  \n(b) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Bank of Mauritius, information as to \nthe amount of foreign currencies injected in the market to regulate same, \nindicating – \n(i) \nthe source of such foreign currency reserve, and  \n(ii) \nif any shortage thereof is still prevailing in the market.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed by the Bank of Mauritius that over the period December 2014 to November 2024, \nthe Bank intervened in the domestic forex market on 142 occasions. \nConcerning part (b) of the question, over the same period, the Bank of Mauritius has \ninjected a total of USD 3.6 billion in the forex market. \n\n32 \n \nAs regards part (b) (i) of the question, the injection of foreign currencies was effected \nthrough the use of the official foreign currency reserves at the Bank of Mauritius. In other \nwords, they depleted the reserves. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (b) (ii) of the question, one of the priorities of this \nGovernment is to have a stable rupee and an adequate supply of foreign currencies in the \nmarket.  \nThe Bank of Mauritius is monitoring the situation on the domestic foreign exchange \nmarket closely, and I am informed that it has already started to implement several measures \nto address the persisting distortions prevailing in the forex market in order to ensure adequate \nsupply of foreign currencies. \nMadam Speaker: I have just two minutes left. We can have a try.  \nHon. Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or! \nECONOMIC SITUATION – DEBT BURDEN – REIMBURSEMENT MECHANISM",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/50",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 50,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/50) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \ncurrent economic situation, he will state the extent of debt burden on the economy in terms of \ninterest and capital reimbursements for 2025 and 2026, respectively, indicating – \n(a) \nthe proposed reimbursement mechanism being envisaged therefor, and  \n(b) \nif any negotiations have been initiated with the International Monetary Fund for \nan eventual Stand-by Agreement.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, as indicated in the ‘State of the Economy’ \ndocument which I laid on the Table of the National Assembly on 10 December, public sector \ngross debt stood at 559.1 billion rupees at the end of June 2024. This represents 83.4% of \nGDP. It has, of course, increased after that. \nThis is well above the statutory debt ceiling of 80% of GDP, which the previous \nGovernment had itself set out in the Public Debt Management Act, which I must say itself is \ntoo high. 80% is too high. It used to be 60%, but nobody paid any attention to it. At the end \n\n33 \n \nof 2014, when I left Government, it was actually 59.5% of GDP. So, they inherited a public \ndebt situation which was fully sustainable, under 60%. And they have turned out to be one of \nthe worst now in several decades. \nOn the basis of the state of public finances inherited from the previous Government – \n• \nFirst, the borrowing requirements of Government during Financial Year 2024-\n2025 is estimated to be around Rs59.6 billion compared to the Budget Estimates \nwhich was Rs38 billion, that is, it is higher by some Rs21.6 billion.  \n• \nSecond, for Financial Year 2024-2025, the interest payment on government debt \nis estimated to be Rs22 billion compared to the Budget Estimates, whereby they \nsaid it was going to be Rs20.1 billion, again, whereas capital repayment is \nestimated to be Rs40 billion. \n• \nThird, for Financial Year 2025-2026, on a no-policy change basis, preliminary \nindications are that interest payment and capital repayment will amount to Rs23.9 \nbillion and Rs37.1 billion, respectively. \nAs regards part (a) of the question, Madam Speaker, the reimbursement mechanism \nwill again entail new borrowings by Government since it already has a very high level of \ndeficit. We will come up with remedial policies in a Fiscal Consolidation Plan to bring public \nsector debt back to the sustainable level that the previous Government had inherited. We will \naim to put it on a downward path. It is not going to be done overnight, obviously, but we \nwant to bring it down to the level that it should have been: 60% of GDP. \n Concerning part (b) of the question, at this stage, no negotiations for an eventual \nStand-by Agreement are being done with the IMF, but we are looking at all options. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Prime Minister. Time is over for the moment! We will \nnow move to Questions to Ministers.  \nI am announcing that PQ I B/73 has been withdrawn. I think I have announced it \nalready. PQs I B/54 and I B/59 have also been withdrawn. So, I will now call on the hon. \nSecond Member for Rodrigues! \n \n\n34 \n \nRODRIGUES – SANDALWOOD EXPORTATION – PHYTOSANITARY \nCERTIFICATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/51",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 51,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/51) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Safe \nCity Project, he will state the number of cameras installed since the implementation thereof to \ndate, indicating the – \n(a) \nnumber thereof – \n(i) \nin use, and  \n(ii) \nout of order, and  \n(b) \ntotal cost incurred thereunder as at to date.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that a contract was signed \nbetween the Mauritius Police Force and Mauritius Telecom on 19 December 2017, for a \nvalue of USD 466 m. (around Rs21 billion for the implementation of the Safe City Project \nwhich would be operating on a lease basis over a period of 20 years. \nIn regard to part (a) of the question, the Safe City Project comprises the following \ncomponents – \n(a) \n4000 Intelligent Video Surveillance cameras; \n(b) \n300 Intelligent Traffic Surveillance cameras; \n(c) \n9 Convergent Command and Control Centres; \n(d) \nan Emergency Response Management System, and \n(e) \na Radio Communication System. \nRegarding parts (a) (i) & (ii) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of \nPolice that, out of a total of 4,000 Intelligent Video Surveillance cameras, 3,992 have been \ninstalled as at 12 December 2024. The remaining eight cameras have not yet been installed. \nI am further informed that out of the 3,992 Intelligent Video Surveillance cameras \ninstalled, 3,953 are operational. The remaining 39 are presently non-operational, due to acts \nof vandalism, awaiting fibre and electrical connection, and relocation in view of road works.  \nWith regard to the 300 Intelligent Traffic Surveillance Cameras, 157 have already been \ninstalled and are operational, whilst the remaining 143 cameras have not yet been installed. \nThe delay is due to the fact that the contractor has not installed the total required number of \npoles which was specified in the contract.  \n\n147 \n \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat the payment is effected on a yearly basis. As at date, an amount of USD 85,124,952.46 \nhas already been paid to Mauritius Telecom.  \nIt is clear that the utilisation of the system, especially in the detection of crime and \nensuring public security and safety was well below expectations. In fact, very often the safe \ncity cameras were being used to track the movement of political opponents and spy on the \nMauritian citizens. \nI would like to bring to the attention of the House of the extremely high cost of the Safe \nCity project which started in 2017 and has not yet been completed. Some serious crimes have \nnot been captured on the Safe City cameras. The operation of these cameras has to be \ncompletely reviewed, so as to help the authorities in tackling, inter alia, the crime problem, \ntraffic accidents and the drug scourge. \nThe House would also recall how in the process to elucidate certain atrocious crimes, \nsafe city cameras in specific areas were conveniently found defective and inoperative.  \nI am thus proposing that an independent assessment of the Safe City project be \nconducted in order to ensure first and foremost, the safety and security of the Mauritians and \nthe prompt elucidation of crimes. \nLATE MR S. K. – ALLEGED MURDER CASE – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/52",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 52,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Riviére du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/52) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the case \nof alleged murder of late S. K., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to where matters stand as to the inquiry initiated \nthereinto.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that the case of the alleged \nmurder of late S.K. is ongoing at the level of the Major Crime and Investigation team of the \nPolice. \nThis case is of utmost priority to the Police and the new Commissioner of Police has set \nup a new team to ensure that those responsible for this hideous crime be brought to justice as \nsoon as possible. \nI wish to inform the House that since 18 October 2020, date on which the case was \nreferred to the Moka Police Station, 98 persons were interviewed by the Police, including the \nformer Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection, Mr Yogida Sawmynaden.  \n\n148 \n \nThereafter, a Judicial Enquiry was instituted by the Magistrate of the District Court of \nMoka to further investigate into the matter and a Report was submitted to the Office of the \nDirector of Public Prosecutions. Upon submission of the Report on 22 November 2021, the \nlatter advised the Police to carry out again an in-depth investigation with utmost diligence \nand professionalism with a view to exploring avenues as to the possible motives behind the \nunlawful killing of late S.K. \nFollowing the advice of the DPP, the Police interviewed 64 persons, the last one being \nin May 2024. \nAs we stand today, 161 persons have been interviewed in this case by the Police but not \na single one has been arrested. \nSince the said alleged murder was reported, we, on this side of the House, have been \nvehemently protesting against the way the investigations were being carried out under the \ndirection of the previous Commissioner of Police. After 4 years, now it is clear that there was \nno willingness of the previous Government to elucidate such an atrocious crime. On the \ncontrary they did a cover up and said it was a case of suicide. The citizens of this country, \nespecially the affected family are still waiting for justice to be done. I have in mind the \nwidow and the son of late Mr S.K. I seize this opportunity to inform Mrs S. K. that we will do \neverything to uncover the truth.  \nI have said it before and today, as Prime Minister, I wish to reiterate that I am not at all \nsatisfied with the way the investigations have been carried out in this case. I am considering, \nin consultation with the Commissioner of Police and other legal instances, to enlist the \nservices of foreign investigating bodies to assist the Police Force in its investigations so as to \nshed light into this case. \n \nMYSTIK FESTIVAL CONCERT – CANCELLATION REASONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/53",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 53,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/53) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands  whether, in regard to the \ncancellation of the Mystik Festival Musical Concert which was scheduled for Saturday 07 \nDecember 2024, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of \nPolice, information as to the reasons for overturning the prior approval granted for the \nholding of the concert.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n\n149 \n \n \nALLEGED TELEPHONE CONVERSATIONS – COMMISSION OF INQUIRY – \nUPDATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/54",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 54,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands —",
      "question": "(No. B/54) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Cabinet decision dated 25 October 2024 for arrangements to be made for the \nsetting up of a Commission of Inquiry to inquire into and report on the alleged misuse of \ntelecommunications infrastructure and the publications and/or broadcast of alleged telephone \nconversations on social media and other platforms, he will state where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nILLEGAL RALLIES & MOTOR RACING – CONTROL – LEGAL FRAMEWORK",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/55",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 55,
      "asked_by": "| B/56 Rodrigues and Outer Islands The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr Francois)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries —",
      "question": "(No. B/55) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister \nof Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to Santalum \nAlbum trees, commonly known as sandal wood, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the National Plant Protection Office and/or Conservator of Forestry Services, \ninformation as to – \n(a) \nif any phytosanitary certificate for the exportation thereof from Rodrigues have \nbeen delivered from 2022 to date and, if so, indicate the – \n(i) \nconditions attached thereto; \n(ii) \npersons and companies holding same, and  \n(b) \nthe volume of sandalwood to be or recently shipped from Rodrigues.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, hon. Second Member for Rodrigues. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the National Plant Protection Office of my Ministry \nthat no phytosanitary certificate has been issued from 2022 to date for the exportation of \nsandalwood from Rodrigues.  \nAs for the Forestry Service of my Ministry, I am informed that to date, no sandalwood \nhas been imported from Rodrigues.  \nHowever, Madam Speaker, the Forestry Service has indicated that on 28 April 2024, it \nreceived an application from Timber Touch Ltd, a private company, for registration as a \ndealer in sandalwood.  \nAn acknowledgement certificate was issued on 12 September 2024. On 25 October \n2024, the Forestry Service received a letter from the Commission for Agriculture of \nRodrigues informing that it had received an application dated 19 August 2024 from Timber \nTouch Ltd for the exploitation of sandalwood in Rodrigues as follows – \n• \n10 tons from private land belonging to Mr Jean Marie Allas at La Ferme, and \n\n35 \n \n• \n30 tons from the property of Mr Ithier Ivan at La Ferme. \nOn 26 November 2024, the Forestry Service informed the Commission that it has no \nobjection to the application provided – \n(i) \nthe sandalwood has been legally purchased from private lands and subject to the \nrecommendation of the Commission of Agriculture; \n(ii) \nthe company shall have to submit shipping documents to the Forestry Service \nonce the transportation is effected; \n(iii) the clearance is only for transfer to Mauritius and is valid for single-use until 30 \nJanuary 2025. \nThe Commission of Agriculture has informed that as of the date, no approval to that \neffect has been issued. Sandalwood has, therefore, not been exported to Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker, the Commission for Agriculture has informed that the Police in \nRodrigues are conducting an inquiry to investigate possible infringement in the matter \nregarding the source of the timber. \nI have, therefore, requested the Conservator of Forests to investigate into the matter to \nidentify weaknesses, loopholes in the process or procedure with a view to further \nstrengthening control and ensure the proper management of sandalwood in Rodrigues.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. You have a supplementary? Yes! \nMr François: Thank you. I thank the hon. Minister for his answer. In light of the \nanswer given, will the hon. Minister be agreeable to amend the G.N. 238 of 2024 with regard \nto Rodrigues following his answers? \nDr. Boolell: I will certainly look into it and ask the State Law Office, if need be, to do \nthe needful. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister.   \nThe hon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \n \n \n\n36 \n \nRIVIÈRE DES ANGUILLES DAM – CONSTRUCTION DETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-december-2024"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/57",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 57,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government —",
      "question": "(No. B/57) Mr R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to roads at Camps la Serpe, \nChemin La Forge, MCB Road and Chemin Cooperative in Bel Air, he will state if any survey \n\n38 \n \nhas been carried out to assess the state thereof, indicating the estimated cost to be incurred for \nthe reconstruction thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I am informed by the District Council of \nFlacq that a survey was carried out on 12 December 2024 by its officers. It was observed that \nthe chemin Cooperatif in Bel Air is in good condition and does not require any reconstruction \nworks. However, it was noted that for Camps la Serpe and MCB Road, the Central Water \nAuthority has undertaken pipe-laying works along the roads, but the same have not been \nreinstated yet as the works are still ongoing. \nThe CWA has informed that the pipe-laying works are expected to be completed by the \nend of December 2024, while the resurfacing of the roads will be completed by January 2025. \nIt should be highlighted that a wayleave was granted to the CWA by the District Council of \nFlacq. \nWith regard to the cost estimates, the reinstatement of the two lateral roads at Camps la \nSerpe will amount to Rs2,275,000 while for the road at Camps la Serpe, Avenue Perle d’Or \nBeck, same will amount to Rs1,610,000. As regards the MCB Road, the cost is estimated at \nRs1,140,000. \nFurthermore, with regard to chemin La Forge, the cost of resurfacing works is estimated \nat Rs875,000. As no budget has been earmarked, the District Council of Flacq will seek \nfinancial clearance accordingly prior to carrying out the works. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Your next question, please! \nSEBASTOPOL MITD CENTRE – CONVERSION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/58",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 58,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and) Human Resource —",
      "question": "(No. B/58) Mr R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether he will state if consideration \nwill be given for the conversion of the Sebastopol MITD into a State Secondary School for \nthe benefit of students in the regions of Sebastopol, Mont Ida and Olivia.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that the issue of \nconversion of the Sebastopol MITD Centre into a State Secondary School does not arise.  \n\n39 \n \nThe Sebastopol SSS is a full-fledged secondary school, and the MITD Centre is \nsituated within the compound of the Sebastopol SSS. In fact, the MITD Centre in Sebastopol \nexists only since the start of the academic year 2024. \nFollowing the results of the NCE in 2023, whereby a high majority of the students of \nthe Extended Programme did not meet the NCE pass criteria, the MITD implemented the \nNC2 Courses with Bright Up Programme to ensure the continuity of education for the \nstudents. The programme was meant to enable students to join the vocational sector, \nincluding the world of work, through National Certificate Level 2 and thereafter, leading to \nNational Certificate Level 3. \nIn that context, the unused part of Sebastopol SSS was put at the disposal of the MITD \nto run NC2 Courses with Bright Up Programme for trainees in the eastern region, primarily \nfrom the Sebastopol, Mont Ida and Olivia regions. The area consisted of 10 classrooms, \nnamely eight classrooms in Block A, four on the first floor and four on the second floor; two \nclassrooms from Block B, one classroom on the first floor and one classroom on the second \nfloor; and two toilet blocks of Block A. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that the Sebastopol SSS is a low-intake \nsecondary school located at the foot of Montagne Blanche Mountain and catering to boys in \nthe Zone 2 region, Beau Bassin-Rose Hill and East. It commenced its operation in the year \n2000, and its building consists of five blocks, A, B, C, D, and E, with a total of 28 \nclassrooms. Currently, only 18 classrooms, along with the administrative offices and \nspecialist rooms, are in use by the staff and students of Sebastopol SSS. \nFor the academic year 2024, it had an overall total of 167 students enrolled in Grades 7 \nto 11, including students of the ex-Extended Programme. \nI am also informed that the school population of Sebastopol SSS has been decreasing \nconstantly over the past years. There is only one section of each grade, and there has been no \nintake at the Grade 12 level since 2019. For the academic year 2025, requests for admissions \nstand at 19, comprising only 11 students for Grade 7 and only 8 students for the first year \nLower Secondary of the new Foundation Programme in Literacy, Numeracy and Skills. \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed that the MITD invested some Rs2.47 m. in its \ncentre at Sebastopol SSS in terms of upgrading works, procurement of training and IT \nequipment, and acquisition of furniture. The activities of the MITD and the Secondary School \n\n40 \n \nat the Sebastopol SSS building are well separated, including different break periods. All \narrangements are in place so that there are no conflicting activities and both institutions \noperate in harmony. \nMadam Speaker, the Sebastopol SSS will continue to remain a full-fledged secondary \nschool to serve the academic needs of students in its surrounding areas and support equitable \naccess to education for students in its vicinity, fulfilling the Government’s mandate to \nprovide quality education without discrimination based on foundational performance. The \ninstitution already has the required infrastructure, including well-equipped laboratories, \nclassrooms and other facilities to deliver academic training aligned with national educational \ngoals. \nHowever, the shared infrastructure with the MITD will continue to coexist to ensure \nlearners in the neighbouring regions are given fair treatment in terms of access to vocational \nstudies and training, which is a fundamental pathway to education and skills development. I \nwish here to inform the House that similar arrangements already exist at La Gaulette SSS. \nMadam Speaker, I also wish to inform the House that currently there are two state \nschools to cater for the need of education of girls at secondary level in Zone 2, namely – \n(i) \nQuartier Militaire SSS, and \n(ii) \nBel Air SSS. \nMadam Speaker, my Ministry has the portfolios for education, human resource, training \nand skills development; there is a need for a holistic approach and better linkages and \nsynergies among the various partners to provide a wide array of services to our diversified \nlearners for them to grow into productive and resilient citizens. \nRODRIGUES – PORT MATHURIN PORT DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN \nIMPLEMENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/59",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 59,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr Francois)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries —",
      "question": "(No. B/59) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister \nof Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to Port \nMathurin Port Development Master Plan, he will state where matters stand as to the \nimplementation thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n\n41 \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes, Second Member for Rivière des \nAnguilles and Souillac! \nSTATE SECONDARY ACADEMIES & REGIONAL SCHOOLS – GRADE 10 \nINTAKE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/60",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 60,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports —",
      "question": "(No. B/60) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to illegal rallies and motor racing \nin public places and along public roads, he will state if his Ministry will consider coming up \nwith a legal framework for the proper control of such activity to reduce the risks of accidents.",
      "answer": "Reply (The Prime Minister): I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that, \nunder section 125 of the Road Traffic Act, a person who promotes or takes part in motor \nraces on a road, should, subject to certain conditions, get the consent of the Commissioner of \nPolice.  \nThe Police receives each year about 18 applications from registered organisations for \nracing events for both motorcycles and motor cars. These applications are assessed, based on \nthe eligibility criteria of participants, safety concerns, and the suitability of the location where \nthe rally would be held. After consultations with relevant Ministries and Departments and in \ncase all the conditions are met, the Police authorises the holding of these rallies. The rallies \nare commonly held at La Nicolière, the Parking of Anjalay Stadium, Plaine Champagne and \nChamarel. \nHowever, it has been observed that such races and rallies involving both motor cars and \nmotorcycles are being held in certain locations illegally, usually after midnight.  From the \nyear 2020 to end of November 2024, 28 cases of illegal rallies have been reported to the \nPolice and 28 contraventions have been established. Moreover, the Police receives every year \n\n150 \n \naround 40 complaints from members of the public relating to speeding and noise caused by \nillegal rallies and races. \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Police that, in order to curb down the holding of \nillegal rallies and motor racing, the local police regularly put in place special deployments \nthrough vehicular patrols, vehicle check points and targeted operations in hot spots. The \nexisting police deployment is being reinforced with the involvement of the Special Mobile \nForce and the Special Supporting Unit for increased patrols and police presence at targeted \nareas.   \nMotor rallies and racing are popular sports activities worldwide and there is growing \ninterest in these activities in Mauritius as well. With a view to ensuring the safety and \nsecurity of participants and spectators, a dedicated space with the proper infrastructure for the \nconduct of such rallies and races is desirable.  \nIn this connection, I am informed by the Ministry of Youth and Sports that, a \npreliminary study to explore the need for the setting up of a Rally Circuit in Mauritius, was \ncarried out in the year 2022. The study has recommended that a Specialist Consultant be \nappointed to assess the feasibility of the project. This has not been done so far. \nWith regard to a legal framework for the proper control of such activities, I am \ninformed by the Commissioner of Police that amendments will be brought to the existing \nlegislation so as to strengthen provisions to deter the holding of illegal rallies and motor \nracing. The proposed amendments may include the following – \n(i) \nprovision for designated areas for safe and authorised racing events; \n(ii) \nhigher fines for illegal road racing, including terms of imprisonment;  \n(iii) disqualification of driving licence of participants involved in illegal rallies and \nmotor racing, and \n(iv) provisions in the law to enable contraventions to be established through the use of \nCCTV and Safe City camera images as well as the use of drones with night vision \ntechnology to be used as evidence for any successful prosecution. \nThe Police have the responsibility to maintain law and order as well as the safety and \nsecurity of road users. We shall bring necessary amendments to the existing Road Traffic Act \nwith a view to facilitating the task of the police to take contraventions. \n \n \n \n\n151 \n \nMOGAS & DIESEL – PROPOSED PRICE REDUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/61",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 61,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Riviére des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and’ Human Resource —",
      "question": "(No. B/61) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to State \nSecondary Academies and Regional Schools, he will state the yearly intake of boys and girls \nat Grade 10 level, respectively, since the implementation thereof to date, indicating if his \nMinistry proposes the phasing out thereof and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, I am informed that in the wake of the \nimplementation of the Nine-Year Continuous Basic Education reforms, provision was made \nfor successful candidates at the National Certificate of Education (NCE) to be provided with \nthe option of either pursuing their studies in Grade 10 in their respective regional schools or \nbeing admitted in one of the twelve designated academies.  \nThe criteria for admission to academies are provided under regulation 18B of the \nEducation (Amendment) Regulations 2018, which inter alia states that – \n“  \n(2) \nPriority of admission to Grade 10 in an Academy shall be determined \non the basis of the grade aggregate and the relative performance of the eligible pupil in \nthe best 8 core subjects, including English, French and Mathematics, at the NCE \nassessment and the choice of the responsible party (...)” \nMadam Speaker, as is the case for each tier where admission is made on the basis of \nrelative performance of students, candidates have to strive very hard to achieve the best \nresults to secure a place in a good academy.  \nI am informed that those who have applied for a seat in an academy but have not been \nable to secure a seat in the school of their choice are also given the opportunity of applying \nfor a transfer to another academy. In all the cases of allocation of seats that are carried out by \nthe MES, Madam Speaker, the determining criteria remain the relative performance of the \nstudent in the eight best subjects. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that the yearly intake in Grade 10 in the 12 Academies \nfor the academic years 2021-2022, 2023-2024 and 2025 for boys and girls are as follows – \n\n42 \n \n• \n2021-2022 – boys: 1,084, girls: 1,084; \n• \n2023 – boys: 1,018, girls: 1,056; \n• \n2024 – boys: 1,000, girls: 1,069, and \n• \n2025 – boys: 1,003, girls: 1,062. \nAs regards the Regional Schools, I am informed that the yearly intake in Grade 10 for \nthe Republic of Mauritius for the academic years 2021-2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 for boys \nand girls is as follows – \n• \n2021-2022 – boys: 3,548, girls: 4,335; \n• \n2023 – boys: 3,973, girls: 4,662; \n• \n2024 – boys: 3,966, girls: 4,997, and \n• \n2025 – boys: 3,381, girls: 3,973. \nMadam Speaker, with your permission, I am tabling the statistics for the yearly intake \nof boys and girls in Grade 10 for both academies and regional schools. \nMadam Speaker, we espouse the philosophy that higher-ability students should be \nprovided with ample opportunities to unleash their full potential and develop their talents. \nHowever, no structured survey has been carried out over the years to assess the degree to \nwhich academies have been able to achieve the initial purpose of operating as centres of \nexcellence. \nIn fact, it has been noted that there have been a number of problems and challenges \nassociated with a mixed school environment being offered in academies, as well as with the \ndisruption that is caused in the pedagogical pathway of the student when he or she frequently \nshifts to another school, depriving him or her of a sense of belonging to a school and \nimbibing him or her with the school ethos. \nMoreover, a vacuum is left behind in the regional school when the best students join \nacademies, resulting in the school environment and these regional schools being affected and \nthe morale and motivation of those left behind adversely impacted. In fact, these problems \nresult in social, psychological and cultural factors that influence the student behaviour and \n\n43 \n \ninteraction, thus affecting the momentum and synergy at all levels due to the perception that \nthere are better-performing schools or even teachers who are posted in academies, while in \nreality the facilities and the services offered are the same in all secondary schools. \nMadam Speaker, those who joined academies are not in a better situation either. After \njoining a secondary school at Grade 7, they are again made to join an academy in Grade 10 \nand then they are provided with an additional opportunity to change school in Grade 12 \nwhere they get their SC results. Also, they have to adapt to the co-educational environment. \nThe staff of academies have also reported a decrease in the academic performance of \nstudents, mainly related to adaptability problems. \nMoreover, parents and staff have also raised concern about the security of children in \nthe co-ed environment in these schools. All these elements will have to be looked into and an \nassessment carried out. On the basis of the findings of this exercise, a review of the \norientation for academies will accordingly be carried out for implementation as from the \nintake of 2026. \nMadam Speaker, in this regard I wish to inform the House that my Ministry had, on \nMonday 09 December 2024 and Monday 16 December 2024, organised the preparatory \nmeetings with all concerned stakeholders in the Education Sector to receive their inputs, \nwhich will culminate in the holding of the Assises de l’éducation scheduled to be held in \nApril 2025. The outcome of this exercise will pave the way forward for a review of the \npresent educational system and formulation of new policy direction as from the year 2026 \nincluding that of upper secondary education. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much, Minister! The hon. Second Member for Flacq \nand Bon Accueil!  \nYou wanted to have a go? Okay?  \nMr Jhummun: Madame la présidente,…. \nMadam Speaker: Catch my eye! \nMr Jhummun: Permettez-moi de faire une petite réflexion. Never in the history of this \ncountry has so much harm been done in so little time. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Member! Are you putting a question or making a statement? \n\n44 \n \nMr Jhummun: Before putting my question, I just want to make a small statement, \nbeing from the educational sector myself. \nMadam Speaker: No! I am sorry; I will not be able to allow you because if I do this, I \nwill be setting up a precedent, and everybody will want to make a statement. I can \nunderstand. I do not speak; I also listen because it is a very interesting subject, of course. \nPlease put a question! No statement! \nMr Jhummun: Thank you. So, after so much harm has been done to the school \ncommunity, can the hon. Minister tell this House and the population at large whether a proper \nstudy was carried out prior to the implementation of such a project by the so-called \npedagogue? Thank you. \nDr. Gungapersad: Thank you, hon. Member. Definitely, this Government is going to \nrepair and make amends for the harm to the children of this Republic. Rest assured this \nGovernment will take into consideration the views and the opinions of all stakeholders before \ndeciding the way forward. \nMadam Speaker: There is a Member who is very good at catching my eye. Hon. Mr \nFrançois! \nMr François: Thank you very much, Madam Speaker. With regard to the ‘Assises de \nl’éducation, which is due for next year, will the hon. Minister extend consultation in \nRodrigues with all stakeholders thereat? \nDr. Gungapersad: Thank you, hon. Member. There is a consensus that a delegation \nfrom the Ministry of Education moves to Rodrigues in order to listen to the stakeholders in \nRodrigues because they have specific problems which are there for Rodrigues. Rest assured \nthat this will be done, hon. Member. \nMadam Speaker: Now, I think we move to the hon. Second Member for Flacq and \nBon Accueil. \nSIR ANEROOD JUGNAUTH HOSPITAL - COMPREHENSIVE AUDIT – ISSUES & \nREMEDIAL ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/62",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 62,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness —",
      "question": "(No. B/62) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Sir Anerood Jugnauth Hospital \n\n45 \n \nat Constance, he will state if his Ministry has carried out a comprehensive audit of the \nhospital and, if so, indicate the issues identified and the remedial actions being envisaged \ntherefor.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, as a newly appointed minister, I am visiting all hospitals \nto enquire on the state of affairs thereof. Accordingly, I carried out a site visit at Flacq \nHospital on Wednesday, 11 December 2024. Many shortcomings were identified in terms of \npublic safety, management of patients flow within the hospital, infrastructural issues and \nlogistics as follows – \n1) \nNo provision has been made for a pedestrian crossing in front of the hospital; \n2) \nParking slots provided for patients were inexistent; \n3) \nTaxi slots were provided some 800 metres away from the entrance of the \nhospital; \n4) \nVisitors from different parts of the district are in general encountering \ndifficulties in obtaining public transport to access the hospital; \n5) \nThere was a lack of signage inside the hospital to direct outpatients and visitors; \n6) \nThe pharmacy department is located far from the outpatient departments, and no \nproper provision has been made for endoscopy and ophthalmology services; \n7) \nThe cardiology services were operational, but interventional cardiology services \ncomprising angiography and angioplasty are yet to be established; \n8) \nThere is also a delay in delivery of critical equipment such as city scan and X-\nray machines for the radiology department; \n9) \nMRI equipment have been received but not yet installed; \n10) \nThe existing electrical generators have short autonomy duration and needs \nrefueling every six hours; \n11) \nLack of bathroom facilities and mess rooms for staff; \n12) \nNo provision has been made for a canteen tuck shop in the vicinity of the \nhospital; \n\n46 \n \n13) \nThe triage section has to be relocated with sufficient attendants, wheelchairs and \npatient trolleys for timely convenience of patients who cannot walk; \n14) \nLimited number of power points, telephone sockets, wash hand machine, sinks at \ndifferent wards and units; \n15) \nLack of partitioning at the physiotherapy department and several other \ndepartments; \n16) \nThe occupational therapy and physiotherapy units are to be relocated; \n17) \nThe laboratory stalls and dental services have not been fully relocated to the new \nhospital, and \n18) \nNo leachate treatment plant for disposal of treated wastewater. \nMadam Speaker, I am pleased to announce that immediate action has already been \ntaken to address the issues faced by the public and taxi operators. To this end, 50 parking \nslots are being made available to patients and visitors at the entrance of the hospital. \nMoreover, three taxi slots have been allocated nearer to the main entrance of the \nhospital. I am also informed that five parking slots have been reserved for ambulances in \nfront of the accident and emergency unit at the entrance of the hospital for drop-off and pick-\nup patients, including dialysis patients. \nMadam Speaker, as regards the inhaled nitric oxide apparatus which is currently lying \nidle at the hospital, I am informed there is a nitrogen cylinder that had been procured two \nweeks ago, and a breathing circuit is awaited. Training will be conducted in January 2025 by \na team from the US, and thereafter, the equipment will be used for children suffering from \npersistent pulmonary hypertension. \nMadam Speaker, a technical committee has been set up to look into the remedial \nactions that have to be taken in the short to medium term with a view to improving the health \nservices at the hospital. This technical committee will meet on a weekly basis and will report \nprogress to me accordingly. \nI am pleased to announce that the services of one eminent vascular surgeon from \nChennai have been secured to assist our team in complex cases of arteriovenous fistula, that \nis, those who need dialysis. Moreover, as from next year, an eye and a vascular surgery \n\n47 \n \ndepartment as well as a renal transplant unit will be operational at Flacq hospital. Two teams \nhave already been set up for that purpose. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Is that a supplementary or your next question? \nMr Beechook: Supplementary. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, that will probably be the last! \nMr Beechook: Will the hon. Minister please inform the House whether prior to his \nvisit, a huge stock of new equipment was left unused, owing to the coup riban ceremony \nculture of the previous minister which ultimately never happened? \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, there were certain equipment which have not been \nutilised, and that is why they have mentioned that – let us say within the next few months, all \nthese equipment will be operational but there is no need for any coup riban business in the \nministry. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Yes! \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I humbly suggest the hon. Minister to \neven consider, among the 14 measures that he will be implementing, maybe we could suggest \nto move the medical superintendent office and administrative cadres that have contact with \nthe public to lower floors for ease of services? Thank you. \nMr Bachoo: I will look into it. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Aumeer! Last question. \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister, having paid a \nvisit to the hospital only last week, whether there could be an improved signage system \nwithin the hospital which will help both patients and visitors because going there with huge \ncorridors and so many wards and departments, you can get lost very easily? Thank you. \nMr Bachoo: I have mentioned in my statement that we will be having signage. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much. I think we can break for one and a half hours. \nWe will be back at 2.30 p.m. \nAt 1.00 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \n\n48 \n \nOn resuming at 2.31 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated!  \nHon. Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil! \nDRAIN PROJECTS – COSTS BREAKDOWN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/63",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 63,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure —",
      "question": "(No. B/63) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq &Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to drain projects undertaken by the \nLand Drainage Authority and the Drains Infrastructure Construction Ltd., since 2018 to date, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to the respective date \nthereof and the associated costs therefor in each case.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, the Land Drainage Authority Act 2017 was proclaimed \non 22 May 2018, and the Land Drainage Authority became operational on 01 June 2018.  \nMadam Speaker, I wish to highlight that the LDA does not implement drain projects. \nRather, it is the spearheading body of the National Flood Management Programme. As such, \nit allocates drains projects to implementing agencies, which are the National Development \nUnit, the Road Development Authority, the Drains Infrastructure Construction Ltd and local \nauthorities. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to the DICL, I am informed that a total number of 58 \ndrain projects had been allocated to it by the LDA. A status on the project is as follows – \n(a) \n4 projects for a total amount of Rs281,735,292.99 have been completed; \n(b) \n10 projects for a total amount of some Rs1.4 billion are under construction; \n(c) \n11 projects estimated at Rs2.4 billion are at bidding stage; \n(d) \n20 projects estimated at Rs2.1 billion are at design stage, and \n(e) \nthe remaining 13 projects, financial clearance of approximately Rs2.1 billion is \nawaited from the Ministry of Finance. \nThank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \n\n49 \n \nMr Beechook: Merci, Madame. I would like to ask the hon. Minister whether he is \nsatisfied with only 4 projects completed to date since the inception of the LDA and the \nstructure that has been established for executing the drain projects? \nMr Gunness: Obviously, I am not satisfied with only 4 projects. But we have to realise \nalso that it is quite complex. There is a complexity in the designing and the bidding process \nbecause we are talking of billions of rupees. We have a land drainage master plan, on which \nthe Land Drainage Authority based itself to prepare all the plans and where we are going to \nconstruct the drains. So, obviously, I am not satisfied, and we will review things.  \nMr Beechook: Hon. Minister, I would humbly request you, whether it is possible to \nspeed up, especially in terms of allocation of resources to executing bodies like the NDU, \nRDA, DICL and the local authorities, which very often tend to rely on financial resources \nfrom the LDA to execute the projects? \nMr Gunness: I must say they do not rely on financial clearance from the LDA. They \nrely on financial clearance from the Ministry of Finance because we must get finance first to \nundergo projects. But we must also be fair; at times, we get many complexities, like the right \nof entry on the lands and the acquisition of lands. All these take time. At times, you get \nowners who are reluctant to put their land at the disposal of government. So, all these make \nthe project delayed. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Next question, hon. Third Member for Port Louis South and \nPort Louis Central! \nCWA – CHIEF INTERNAL AUDITOR & OTHER STAFF – RESIGNATION \nCAUSES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/64",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 64,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities —",
      "question": "(No. B/64) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the Central \nWater Authority, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to the \n– \n(a) \nreasons for the resignation of the Chief Internal Auditor in June 2024, and \n(b) \nnumber of staff who – \n(i)  \nhave resigned, and  \n\n50 \n \n(ii)  are on leave without pay, since January 2023 to date, indicating if any case \nof constructive dismissal has been lodged against the Authority.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, en ce qui concerne la partie (a) de la question, \nje suis informé que madame Y.L., ancienne auditrice interne en chef de la CWA, a soumis sa \nlettre de démission au directeur général de l’époque, monsieur P.M., le 3 juin 2024.  \nDans sa lettre de démission, madame Y.L. a informé le directeur général de l’époque, \nmonsieur P.M., qu’elle avait été victime d’abus verbaux, d’intimidation, de harcèlement et \nd’acte de représailles depuis qu’elle avait été chargée d’effectuer un audit de conformité sur \nle programme interne de remplacement des tuyaux, mené par la CWA pour l’année 2023-\n2024. Elle a également fait référence aux accusations sans fondement, discriminatoires, \ndiffamatoires portées contre elle par l’ancien directeur général de la Central Water Authority, \nmonsieur P.M., et le directeur général adjoint de la CWA dans deux mémos qui lui ont été \nadressés. \nCes actions ont été entreprises, selon l’auditrice en chef, dans le but de faire taire ces \nrapports ou de la punir pour avoir rempli ses responsabilités vis-à-vis de la CWA. La dame en \nquestion a également déclaré que le plan d’audit interne de l’autorité centrale de l’eau pour \n2023-2024 n’avait pas été approuvé par le board sur la base d’affirmations inexactes faites \npar le directeur général de l’époque, monsieur P.M. \nLa dame a aussi ajouté dans sa lettre de démission que, malgré ses tentatives de régler \nles problèmes susmentionnés par les voies appropriées, aucune mesure significative n’a été \nprise pour les raisons susmentionnées. L’auditrice en chef a déclaré qu’elle n’avait d’autre \nchoix que de démissionner de son poste d’auditrice interne en chef de la CWA. \nLa Chambre se souviendra, Madame la présidente, que les malheurs de madame Y.L. \nont commencé après qu’elle a soumis son rapport sur le programme de remplacement des \ntuyaux internes, ce qu’on appelle les in-house Pipe Replacement Programme – ce fameux \nscandale – qui doit être entrepris par la CWA d’avril 2023 à décembre 2024, qui prévoyait un \nfinancement de R 700 millions en deux tranches de R 350 millions chacune de mon \nministère. \nLe plus intéressant, le rapport de l’audit de la dame a relevé un catalogue d’actes et \nd’omissions coupables de la part de la CWA, du management et de monsieur P. M. qui a \nrecommandé que la deuxième tranche de R 350 millions ne soit pas déboursée par mon \n\n51 \n \nministère jusqu’à ce que les mesures correctives et les recommandations contenues dans le \nrapport soient mises en œuvre par la CWA. \nPour la transparence, je dépose, Madame la présidente, avec votre permission, une \ncopie du rapport de l’audit datée du 9 janvier 2024 à l’attention de la Chambre. \nMadame la présidente, en ce qui concerne la partie (b) de la question, la CWA \nm’informe que depuis janvier 2023 à ce jour, tenez-vous bien, 128 membres du personnel ont \ndémissionné et neuf en congé sans solde, deux cas de licenciement déguisés pour vous dire. \nMerci, Madame la présidente. Le dossier est là.  \nMadam Speaker : Je vous remercie, Monsieur le ministre. Yes ! \nDr. Aumeer: Merci, M. le ministre, pour ces réponses tant attendues à la Chambre. \nEst-ce que le ministre peut nous dire s’il y a eu une enquête au niveau de son ministère pour \nvoir si toutes ces démissions et congés sans solde, dont il vient de mentionner 128 et 9 au \nniveau de la Central Water Authority, est-ce qu’ils sont liés directement à la façon de faire de \nl’ex-General Manager, monsieur P.M.,comme vous l’avez dit, qui était de surcroît un ancien \nSenior Adviser au bureau du Premier ministre ? \nMr Assirvaden : Madame la présidente, bien sûr, il y aura une enquête. C’est sûr ! \nJ’attends la constitution du nouveau board de la Central Water Authority pour pouvoir \ndemander au board de faire une enquête concernant les 128 membres qui ont démissionné \ndepuis, mais aussi de demander une enquête en ce qui concerne le rapport de l’audit.  \nMr Assirvaden: Le rapport de l’audit, si vous me le permettez, Madame la présidente, \nce rapport de l’audit – les membres de la Chambre auront l’occasion de voir ce que l’auditrice \nen chef a écrit, comment pour R 700 millions le management, l’ancien directeur général, a \ndivisé, subdivisé un projet de 700 millions pour contourner les règlements. Ce que vous allez \nlire dans ce rapport, Madame la présidente, est glaçant, inquiétant, scandaleux. Clairement, ce \nrapport fera l’objet d’une enquête. Clairement, ce rapport d’audit montre comment R 700 \nmillions ont été volatilisés dans une opacité totale. L’ancien directeur général et le \nmanagement auront tôt ou tard à répondre pour ce rapport. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Dr. Aumeer. \n\n52 \n \nDr. Aumeer: M. le ministre, est-ce que votre ministère a pris les mesures nécessaires \npour confirmer la véracité des pratiques subterfuges internes auxquelles l’auditrice en chef a \nfait référence dans son rapport ? Je répète la question. \nMr Assirvaden: Oui, s’il vous plaît, oui. \nDr. Aumeer: Est-ce que votre ministère a pris les mesures nécessaires pour confirmer \nla véracité des pratiques subterfuges internes par l’ancien directeur auxquelles l’auditrice en \nchef a fait référence dans son rapport ? \nMr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, je vais dire que l’enquête déterminera en temps \net lieu qui a fait quoi. \nMadam Speaker: Oui. \nMr Assirvaden: L’enquête déterminera en temps et lieu et le Board décidera en temps \net lieu de qui va enquêter sur ce rapport et des mesures qu’on va prendre. Mais, entre-temps, \nje voudrais préciser à la Chambre que j’ai rencontré personnellement l’auditrice en chef. Je \nl’ai rencontré et je peux dire que cette personne, cette auditrice, c’est une professionnelle et \ncette personne est encore traumatisée par ce qu’elle a vécu entre les mains de monsieur P. M. \nDonc, oui, une enquête va être… \nMadam Speaker : Diligentée. \nMr Assirvaden: Pardon, exactement, merci pour le mot. Mais j’attends la constitution \ndu Board de la Central Water Authority pour faire le nécessaire. Merci. \nMadam Speaker: Merci, okay. I now call for the hon. First Member for Montagne \nBlanche and GRSE. \nBEL AIR – NEW MARKET FAIR – ALLOCATION OF STALLS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/65",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 65,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government —",
      "question": "(No. B/65) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the new market fair in Bel Air, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the District Council of Flacq, information as \nto – \n(a) \nthe mechanism put in place for the allocation of stalls thereat; \n(b) \nthe number of stalls not yet allocated, and \n\n53 \n \n(c) \nwhy priority was not given for the allocation of stalls thereat to existing vegetable \nsellers who have been operating in the old market fair for more than forty years.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Thank you, Madam Speaker.  \nI am informed by the District Council of Flacq that the old market fair in Bel Air was a \nprivate one which does not fall under its control and has been operating for more than 30 \nyears. Around 340 sellers were working in this market fair. In the year of 2014, the District \nCouncil decided to construct a new market fair to accommodate a total of 515 stalls. Madam \nSpeaker, following the construction of the new market fair, the District Council invited an \nexpression of interest in accordance with section 57 of the Local Government Act on 19 April \n2024 for allocation of the 515 stalls at the new market fair. \nThe eligibility criteria for allocation of stalls were as follows – \n(i) \nApplicants should be over 18 years; \n(ii) \nApplicants should reside within the administrative area of the district Council \nof Flacq. This condition was not applicable for applicants operating at the \nprivate market fair as per the survey record from the public health department \nof the Council. \n(iii) \nApplicant should be unemployed; \n(iv) \nApplicant should not already be a holder of any stall, booths, shops, space or \nother place inside a market or fair, and last \n(v) \nApplicant should not already be a holder of any trade fee receipt, business \nregistration card or any license from any other authority. \nThe expression of interest exercise was launched for the 515 available stalls, where 339 \nstalls were allocated in the new market fair, while 176 stalls were not allocated. \nSubsequently, 13 stalls were surrendered by the stallholders. Therefore, there were 189 \nvacant stalls to be allocated. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (b) of the question, I am informed by the District \nCouncil that a survey was carried out by Health Department and it was observed that 340 \nstallholders were operating in the old market fair. Only 145 obtained a stall in the new market \nfair, while the remaining 195 stallholders either did not show interest or did not obtain a stall \ndue to the following reasons – \n\n54 \n \n(i) \nThe applicant was holder of business registration card to carry out business in \nother places; \n(ii) \nThe applicant was holder of a stall in the market or fair in other local \nauthorities; \n(iii) \nThe applicant was holder of an employment; \n(iv) \nThe applicant had not signed the application form and had not submitted the \nrequired document. \nFollowing representations from many of the sellers who were not found eligible, the \ncriteria for the reallocation of stalls were reviewed by the District Council, and a second \nexpression of interest was launched on the 01 October 2024, whereby the fifth criterion was \namended as follows – \n“Applicant should not already be holder of any trade fees through receipt, business \nregistration card or any license from any other authority, save and except for persons \nalready found in the survey list of the Public Health Department for being holder of a \nbusiness registration card for distributor of general merchandise, owner of goods \nvehicle having a and/or carrier license or owner of any business registration card or \nactivities in relation to the existing private fair, including growing of vegetables.” \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the District Council that the evaluation of the \napplication is in progress by the Bid Evaluation Committee. Priority will be given to the \nexisting stallholders operating at the private market fair provided that they meet the eligibility \ncriteria for allocation of stalls. My ministry is following the matter closely. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Savanne & Black River. \nNTC – FINANCIAL STATUS – BUS FLEET",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-december-2024"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/66",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 66,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport —",
      "question": "(No. B/66) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the National Transport Corporation, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to – \n(a) \nthe financial status thereof from January 2020 to 30 June 2024, indicating the \ntotal amount of subsidy granted by Government thereto for the same period, and  \n(b) \ncurrent state of the fleet thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am sure that the House will be stunned to \nnote that the last approved audited accounts of the National Transport Corporation relate to \n\n55 \n \nthe financial year ending 31 December 2015. However, I am informed by the NTC that the \naudited accounts for the financial year 2016/2017 were received on 29 October 2024; that \nsame will be considered by the Board for approval. What is more disturbing, Madam \nSpeaker, is that accounts in respect of financial years 2017/2018, 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 \nwere approved by the then NTC Board on 11 September 2024 and thereafter sent to the \nNational Audit Office for audit purposes on 16 September 2024. One would wonder about \nthe compulsion of having the above accounts, which have been pending for several years, to \nbe approved some three weeks before the issue of writ for the last general elections. I leave it \nto the hon. Members to draw their own conclusion. \nAs regards financial statements for the financial year 2020/2021, same are expected to \nbe completed by the end of December 2024. To add insult to injury, Madam Speaker, I am \ninformed that even the management accounts for years 2021/2022, 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 \nare not available and are now being prepared. Same are expected to be completed by the end \nof February 2025, seemingly. \nMadam Speaker, it is utterly inconceivable for a government-owned entity, generating \nbillions of rupees, to have such a backlog of outstanding accounts. This situation is totally \nunacceptable, as in the absence of final accounts, it might be difficult to gauge the true \nfinancial position of the corporation which has been the recipient of billions of rupees of \nsubsidies over the past few years. In fact, the Director of Audit raised serious concerns about \nthe non-finalisation of the annual reports of the NTC in his previous management letters. \nMadam Speaker, the House will surely concur that we cannot condone the inordinate \ndelay in finalising the accounts of the corporation, the more so as the latter has to comply \nwith the provisions relating to the Statutory Bodies (Accounts and Audit) Act relating to the \nfinalisation of annual reports and financial statements within the applicable statutory delay. In \nfact, even before the question was addressed to me, I had instructed my ministry to urge the \nNTC to finalise the pending accounts just like I did for the Metro Express Ltd, and that same \nhas to be audited as a matter of priority. \nMadam Speaker, this situation cannot be allowed to recur, and there is a need for \npersons who had been at the helm of organisations for several years to be made accountable \nfor the current state of affairs. It would appear that dereliction of duty would be way too mild \nto explain the tardy and non-finalisation of the accounts. Against this backdrop, the newly \n\n56 \n \nreconstituted Board of the NTC took the bold decision on 14 December 2024 to terminate the \nappointment of the General Manager, and this, I need to stress, is in accordance with the \nterms and conditions of his contract. An Officer-in-Charge, Dr. Ramakrishna Permal Naidoo, \nhas been appointed pending the recruitment of a new General Manager who will be \ndesignated following an open advertisement process. \nMadam Speaker, as regards the subsidy part of the question, in order not to be lengthy \nin my reply, I am tabling the total amount of subsidy granted by Government to the NTC \nfrom January 2020 to June 2024 and as communicated to me by the NTC. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, the NTC owns a fleet of 499 \nbuses with an overall average age of 11 years, and the fleet comprises various makes and \nmodels, including Ashok Leyland, Tata, Yutong and Nissan. With a view to improving the \nservices, the NTC is in the process of replacing its ageing buses with the procurement of 100 \nnew diesel buses while discussions are ongoing for the sourcing of 200 additional buses. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister. Hon. Third Member for Port Louis South! I am \nsorry, hon. Dr. Aumeer. He tried to catch my eye. \nMr Jugurnauth: Madam Speaker, please. May I ask the hon. Minister if he is aware of \nan NTC bus that caught fire in my constituency on Sunday, and what will his ministry do to \nensure that this type of incident does not occur again? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Thank you. I thought that the hon. Member would ask this \nquestion because Chemin Grenier, where the incident occurred, is in his constituency and that \nof the former Minister of Land Transport, Mr Alan Ganoo. \nMadam Speaker, Members of the House – at least those who were here during the \n2019-2024 session – would recall that the state of the NTC buses was the subject of a \nParliamentary Question on 7 November 2023, namely, PQ B/1405, wherein I queried the then \nminister on the maintenance aspects. Unfortunately, I was rudely denied from fulfilling my \nparliamentary duties by the then Speaker and could not put additional questions as regards the \nservicing of Yutong buses, the make of the bus that caught fire in your constituency and was \ncompletely burnt. \n\n57 \n \nThe Officer-in-Charge of the NTC reported that a semi-low floor bus of make Yutong \nwith immatriculation number 2674 AP 16 caught fire on 15 December 2024, the next day that \nthe General Manager was asked to leave by the Board, around 12:30 hours, at Chemin \nGrenier. According to information provided to me by the NTC, the driver observed thick \nsmoke emanating from the rear of the bus. He immediately stopped the bus, and passengers \nwere evacuated. So, fortunately, there were no casualties. The driver could not, however, \nextinguish the fire with the onboard fire extinguisher, leading to the fire spreading to other \nparts of the bus. Despite the efforts put in by the Mauritius Fire and Rescue Services, the bus \nwas completely burnt. Fortunately, no passengers were injured, like I said, though the driver \nsustained minor burns while attempting to put out the fire. \nThe bus was towed to the Forest Side depot of the NTC. In the meantime, a preliminary \nreport has been submitted to my ministry on the matter. However, with a view to having an \nindependent inquiry on this issue, my ministry has requested the mechanical engineering \ndivision of the Ministry of National Infrastructure to carry out a detailed investigation on the \ncauses and circumstances of the fire outbreak. I rely on my colleague, the Minister of \nNational Infrastructure, and on his officers to promptly look into the matter. The maintenance \nstrategy of the NTC buses will have to be redressed in light of the findings of the above \nindependent investigation, and we cannot and will not allow the lives of our fellow citizens to \nbe put at risk. \nThank you. \n Madam Speaker: Luckily I allowed the question. Yes, now hon. Dr. Aumeer! \nMINISTRY OF HEALTH AND WELLNESS – GENERAL WORKERS – \nRECRUITMENT EXERCISES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/67",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 67,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness —",
      "question": "(No. B/67) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the General \nWorkers at his Ministry, he will state the date for the holding of the last three recruitment \nexercises thereof, indicating in each case the – \n(a) \ndate of advertisement thereof; \n(b) \nnumber thereof recruited, and  \n\n58 \n \n(c) \nconditions of service thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, the post of General Worker falls under the Workmen’s \nClass and is generally filled by delegated powers conferred by the Public Service \nCommission.  \nThe recruitment is made by selection from a list of registered unemployed candidates \nobtained from the Ministry of Labour, Human Resource Development and Training. \nWhenever there are vacancies in the grade, a list of registered and unemployed candidates is \nsought from that Ministry. \nMadam Speaker, the main responsibilities of a General Worker are, amongst others – \n• \nto carry out excavation works; \n• \nloading and transporting stacked materials; \n• \neffecting general cleaning works, and \n• \ncarrying out weeding and cleaning works. \nOfficers in the grade of General Worker are also called upon to provide replacement in \nthe grades of Handy Worker, Tradesman, Driver and Attendant, amongst others, to palliate \nthe lack of staff in those grades. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that prior to the first two of the preceding three \nrecruitment exercises, the number of funded vacancies was 342 in July 2021. Upon the \nrequest of the Ministry of Health and Wellness, a list of 500 registered and unemployed \ncandidates was submitted by the Ministry of Labour, Human Resource Development and \nTraining. Following the recruitment exercise which was conducted between the period 23 \nAugust and 13 September 2021, 297 candidates were offered employment. Out of these, 282 \ncandidates assumed duty, and 260 were confirmed in their appointment. The confirmation of \n22 outstanding candidates is pending due to either poor attendance or unavailability of \nmedical report. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that the number of funded vacancies was 225 in \nApril 2023 prior to the second recruitment exercise. At the request of the Ministry of Health \nand Wellness, a list of 300 registered unemployed candidates was submitted by the Ministry \n\n59 \n \nof Labour, Human Resource Development and Training. Following the recruitment exercise \nwhich was carried out from 18 to 23 May 2023, 210 candidates were offered employment. \nOut of these, 189 candidates assumed duty and have completed one year on a casual basis in \nOctober 2024. Their confirmation is in process. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to the last recruitment exercise, I am informed that the \nnumber of funded vacancies was 300 in April 2024. Again, at the request of the Ministry of \nHealth and Wellness, a list of 600 registered unemployed candidates was submitted by the \nMinistry of Labour, Human Resource Development and Training. Following the recruitment \nexercise which was carried out from 9 to 17 May 2024, 284 candidates were offered \nemployment. Out of this, 257 candidates assumed duty with effect from 08 July 2024 on a \none-year casual basis. \nWith regard to part (c) of the question, the conditions of service for the post of General \nWorker are as follows – \n• Candidates were offered employment on a casual basis for a period of one year as \nfrom the date of assumption of duty.  \n• They draw wages at the rate Rs10,250 monthly, plus salary compensation at \napproved rates, plus the minimum wage increase. \n• They are placed on the permanent and pensionable establishment after having \ncompleted one year of satisfactory service, subject to them being favourably \nreported regarding work, conduct and attendance, and found medically and \nconstitutionally fit for employment in the service. \n• They are required to make a contribution towards their pension at such rates as may \nbe prescribed by law.  \n• They are granted leave entitlement as per the provision of the PRB Report. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you Minister. Yes! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam. Approximately 800 General Workers have been \nrecruited over a three-term recruitment service. Will the hon. Minister, for the sake of good \ngovernance and transparency, table a copy of the recruitment of General Workers, indicating \nin each case the regions where the new recruits hail from? \nMr Bachoo: I will do it.  \n\n60 \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nHon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle! \nINSURANCE INDUSTRY COMPENSATION FUND – HIT AND RUN SUB FUND – \nFUNDS AVAILABLE & DISBURSED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-december-2024"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/68",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 68,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning —",
      "question": "(No. B/68) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the \nInsurance Industry Compensation Fund, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ntherefrom, information as to the amount of funds available under the Hit and Run Sub Fund, \nindicating the total amount disbursed for the year 2023-2024 – \n(a) \nto victims of accidents as compensation, and  \n(b) \nas expenses.",
      "answer": "Dr. Mrs Jeetun: Madam Speaker, section 88 of the Insurance Act 2005 provides for \nthe establishment of the Insurance Industry Compensation Fund (IICF) and for the fund to be \norganised into different sub-funds. In this respect, the Hit and Run Sub Fund has been set up \nunder the Insurance Industry Compensation Fund Regulation 2015 with effect from 01 \nJanuary 2016. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that as of 13 December 2024, the total amount of funds \navailable under the Hit and Run Sub Fund was Rs357,209,827. The total amount of funds \ncomprises contributions received from insurance companies, ranging from Rs25 to a \nmaximum of Rs200 per insurance policy of vehicle as per the First Schedule of the Insurance \nIndustry Compensation Fund Regulation 2015 and interests received. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, in the year 2023-2024, the IICF has received 34 \nclaims, out of which 26 were approved for compensation, five were rejected and three are \nunder consideration. The total amount disbursed for payment to the victims of hit-and-run \naccidents for the year is Rs3,100,000. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, expenses incurred by the IICF, which involve \nadministrative, salaries, allowances, rental and board fees, the fund is managed by a \nmanagement committee, and it has a technical committee, it amounts to Rs5,588,431. So, Rs3 \nm. paid to victims, and Rs5.5 m. incurred in expenses. \n\n61 \n \nI would like to state to the House that clearly there is an issue with this fund, Madam \nSpeaker. At a time when our households, up and down the country, are struggling to make \nends meet, where household bills are ever-increasing, including car insurance premiums, the \nmanagement of this fund and the functioning of this fund raise serious questions. There are \nfunds of Rs357 m. sitting in this fund, but only Rs3 m. disbursed to victims and Rs5.5 m. in \nexpenses. \nSecondly, I was appalled to learn that the Rs357 m. is sitting in current accounts with \nzero interest rates. Can you imagine the amount of money? Just a back-of-envelope \ncalculation at 3% interest gives you 10 million in a year. People have put that money in zero-\nrated current accounts! \nSo, given the above concerns, I will propose to review the functioning and the \nfundamentals of the IICF, Madam Speaker. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes! \nMr Seeburn: Madam Speaker, now that we know that there were some malpractices at \nthe Ministry in the past, will the hon. Minister be able to take the appropriate measures to \nrestore those funds in an appropriate deposit account for the benefit of the House? \nDr. Mrs Jeetun: Madam Speaker, there is a board of the FSC happening today, and I \nhave already spoken to the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry to raise this at the level of the \nboard because this fund sits under the FSC Board. \nMadam Speaker: Very good! Thank you. \nHon. Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \nMAURITIUS DIGITAL HUB – INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 5.0",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/69",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 69,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Riviere des Anguilles and Souillac (Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation —",
      "question": "(No. B/69) Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation \nwhether, in regard to digital innovation/transformation towards Industrial Revolution 5.0, he \nwill state the measures being envisaged to harness the full potential of Mauritius as a digital \nhub in the region of Africa to achieve same. \n\n62",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that Industrial Revolution \n5.0 represents the next transformative phase in global technological advancement, where the \nfocus shifts to a more human-centric approach. It acutely emphasises collaboration between \nhumans and intelligent systems to address critical societal challenges while ensuring as well \nsustainability and inclusivity. \nMadam Speaker, my Ministry has embarked on a resolute journey to align Mauritius \nwith the transformative principles of Industrial Revolution 5.0. \nMadam Speaker, please allow me to now enumerate the measures taken. On December \n11, 2024, my Ministry successfully convened a workshop with ICT operators, uniting key \nleaders and innovators of the sector. This important gathering was more than just a \ndiscussion; it was focused on identifying critical challenges and unlocking opportunities that \nwill propel the ICT sector into a new era of growth and innovation.  \nAs a result, a task force, which is dedicated, has been established to ensure the swift \nand strategic implementation of proposals that we received from the ICT operators. The task \nforce operates with a clear mandate to deliver results that meet the specific needs of our \nnation and contribute to its digital transformation. \nMadam Speaker, beyond just the ICT sector, my Ministry is also expanding its \nengagement to encompass education, health, tourism, agriculture and industry at large. \nThrough targeted sectoral meetings, the aim is to deeply understand the unique challenges \nand opportunities within each of these domains. These engagements will be followed by \nspecialised workshops that will be modelled on the earlier workshop, and the insights \ngathered will form a foundation for a comprehensive blueprint that will be finalised by the \nfirst quarter of 2025. \nMadam Speaker, the previous government came up with an Artificial Intelligence \nStrategy 2018-2022, which was more of a document than anything else. The said strategy \ncomprised some 38 comprehensive recommendations. However, the only recommendation \nthat was implemented was the establishment of the Mauritius Emerging Technologies \nCouncil that was meant to spearhead AI initiators and oversee their implementation. The \nMauritius Emerging Technologies Council (METC) hardly met any of its objectives. \nTherefore, there was no progress achieved. \n\n63 \n \nWe understand, Madam Speaker, that it is imperative to highlight the previous \ngovernment’s lack of commitment to technological advancement and contextualise the vision \nof this newly formed government. In fact, only 0.41 per cent of the national budget was \nallocated to this critical sector. No wonder the quality of the laptops was pretty poor! \nMadam Speaker, my Ministry is dedicated to rectifying past oversights and propelling \nMauritius into a future where technology serves as the cornerstone of economic growth and \nsocietal advancement.  \nBy allocating appropriate resources, fostering public understanding and ensuring ethical \nAI integration, my Ministry aims at positioning Mauritius as a beacon of technological \ninnovation in Africa and globally as well. \nIn conclusion, Madam Speaker, Mauritius stands ready to embrace the transformative \npotential of IR 5.0 and AI. By addressing past shortcomings, strengthening institutions like \nthe METC and leveraging partnerships with the African Union, UNESCO and global \nplatforms like the G20, which actually run an initiative on AI for Africa. So, this Government \nis laying the foundation for inclusive and sustainable progress. \nOur commitment is to position Mauritius as a leader in technology, ensuring AI and \nemerging innovations drive tangible benefits across all sectors of the economy. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle.  \nBOIS DES AMOURETTES – FOOTBALL GROUND – ONGOING \nRENOVATION – COMPLETION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/70",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 70,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government —",
      "question": "(No. B/70) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the ongoing renovation of the \nfootball ground in Bois Des Amourettes, he will state where matters stand, indicating the – \n (a)  scope of work thereof, and  \n(b)  expected completion date thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Madam Speaker, I am informed by the \nDistrict Council of Grand Port that it has no renovation project for the football ground at Bois \ndes Amourettes. \n\n64 \n \nI am further informed that the National Development Unit (NDU) is presently \nundertaking renovation works thereat. The NDU has apprised that Phase 1 of the project of \nupgrading works at Bois des Amourettes football ground consisted of returfing works. The \ncontract was allocated to Sotravic Ltd on 17 February 2023 by the NDU under its framework \nagreement for amenities for an amount of Rs6,715,349.80, including VAT. \nWith regard to the scope of works, the project consisted of excavation of the soil up to a \ndepth of 0.95 metres, provision of spalls 200 to 300 mm thickness up to a depth of 0.5 metres, \nlaying of geotextile, construction of 135 metres of French drains, provision of engineering \nfill-up up to a depth of 0.25 metres, provision of topsoil up to a depth of 0.20 metres, \nlevelling of the football pitch and grass planting of an extent of 4,250 m². \nAlthough the project started on 06 March 2023 and was expected to be completed by 27 \nJuly 2023, the completion date was eventually extended to 07 September 2023 due to the \ninclement weather, causing the site to be impractical due to the muddy condition, as well as \nthe change in design due to the fact that the existing topography and ground conditions \nrequired spalls (200 to 300 mm) to be used to stabilise the ground condition, and geotextile \nhad to be used for the whole area of the site. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to Phase 2 of the project “Upgrading of Fencing at Bois \nDes Amourettes Football Ground”, it consists of upgrading of frontage fencing, and the \ncontract was allocated to Sotravic Ltd on 30 January 2024 by the NDU under its framework \nagreement for amenities for an amount of Rs4,113,109.55, including VAT. The works started \non 04 March 2024. \nThe project includes –  \n(i) \nthe demolition of an existing block wall over a length of 84.29 metres;  \n(ii) \nexcavation and laying of blinding concrete and erection of block wall; \n(iii) \nfencing up to a height of one metre above existing ground level; \n(iv) \nsupply and fixing of heavy-duty galvanised fencing up to a height of 4.5 metres; \n(v) \nsupply of one main gate and one pedestrian gate. \nMadam Speaker, as per part (b) of the question, I am informed that Phase 2, which was \nsupposed to be completed on 22 July 2024, is now scheduled for 20 December 2024. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes, hon. Member! \n\n65 \n \nMr Seeburn: Madam Speaker, now we know that for Phase 2, the works began on 04 \nMarch 2024 and were set for completion on 22 July 2024. \nHowever, same will now be completed on 20 December 2024, as informed by the hon. \nMinister. Were there any liquidated damages applied by the National Development Unit, and \nalso, if the hon. Minister can state the amount if any. \nMadam Speaker: You can’t both stand at the same time! Let him finish, hon. \nMinister! \nMr Woochit: Yes. \nMr Seeburn: And also, can the hon. Minister give special attention for the project to be \ncompleted in the nearest delay? \nMadam Speaker: Did you get his question? I didn’t! It’s alright. \nMr Woochit: Yes, Madam Speaker. Due to the late completion of the outstanding \nworks by the contractor without justification, liquidated damages amounting to Rs245,000, \nexcluding VAT, were applied by the NDU, and we will follow the works closely to complete \nthe work timely. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Your next question! \nGRAND PORT COASTAL ROAD – CWA – NEW WATER PIPES \nINSTALLATION – COMPLETION DATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/71",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 71,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities —",
      "question": "(No. B/71) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the new water pipes \nbeing currently installed along coastal road of Grand Port, Anse Jonchée and Bambous \nVirieux, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, \ninformation as to where matters stand, indicating the expected completion date thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madam Speaker, the project to renew the old defective distribution \nnetwork along the coastal road of Grand Port, including Anse Jonchée and Bambous Virieux, \nis in two phases – \n• \nPhase 1 of the project, over the section from Anse Jonchée to Bambous Virieux \nand Petit Sable, pipes are being replaced over a length of 6.4 km, and works have \ncommenced on 10 June 2024. The scheduled completion date is on 10 February \n\n66 \n \n2025. As at date, 5.4 km of pipes have already been laid, of which 3.9 km have \nbeen tested and commissioned. Temporary road reinstatement has been \ncompleted over 4.5 km. \n• \nRegarding Phase 2 of the project from Ferney to Anse Jonchée, the total length of \npipe replacement is 6.7 km, and works have started on 07 October 2024 with an \nexpected completion date of 06 June 2025. As of now, 2.5 km of pipeline has \nbeen laid, and temporary road reinstatement has been completed for 1.8 km. \nMadam Speaker, following the completion and commissioning of the above 13.1 km of \nnew pipeline by June 2025 next year, dans six mois, it is expected that water distribution for \napproximately 1,800 households in the region would be considerably improved. Thus, the \nvillage of Bambous Virieux, which is currently being provided water through CWA water \ntankers on alternate days, will be supplied with water through the newly laid pipe with \nadequate pressure. \nIn addition, the villages of Grand Port, Anse Jonchée et Bambous Virieux will benefit \nfrom 18 hours of supply daily instead of 12 hours currently. J’espère que la réponse est \nsatisfaisante. Merci, Madame. \nMadam Speaker: He is doing his best.  \nMr Seeburn: Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand \nRiver South East! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 10 – WATER SUPPLY – PONT LARDIER – DAM \nCONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/72",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 72,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities —",
      "question": "(No. B/72) Mr R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the regular \ninterruption in water supply in several areas in Constituency No. 10, Montagne Blanche and \nGrand River South East, he will – \n(a)  for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, \ninformation as to the measures being envisaged to alleviate the burden of the \ninhabitants thereof, and  \n\n67 \n \n(b)  state if consideration will be given for the construction of a dam in the region of \nPont Lardier as a long-term solution.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Central Water Authority that \nto improve water supply in the region of Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East, we \nare currently engaged in the following projects – \n1. \nUpgrading of the distribution network through the replacement of 6.82 km of \npipeline along several laterals in the region of Bramsthan and Bel Air. The \nCentral Water Authority has identified another 9.7 km of pipeline to be renewed \nin the coming years, and \n2. \nPreliminary investigation in connection with the proposed drilling of new \nborehole at L’Etoile to harness additional groundwater to supply the region. \n \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that the \nCentral Water Authority proposes to abstract water from Deep River to Pont Lardier via a \nriver intake structure to be treated in a new water treatment plant.  \n \nThe project at Pont Lardier comprises three components, namely – \n(i) \nthe construction of a river intake structure on Deep River; \n(ii) \na water treatment plant, and  \n(iii) \na service reservoir. \nThe water treatment plant will have a capacity of 15,000 m³/day, while the reinforced \nconcrete service reservoir will have a capacity of 4000 m³. I am informed that financial \nclearance for the project has been obtained and the Central Water Authority will be notified \nof the relevant clearances shortly. It is expected that the construction works at Pont Lardier \nwill start by December 2025. \nIn light of the above, Madam Speaker, the construction of a dam at Pont Lardier \nwould not be warranted. Merci, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Vous ne vous êtes pas planté ! \nMr Assirvaden: Heureusement. \n\n68 \n \nMadam Speaker: Happy? Okay. So, next is the hon. First Member for Port Louis \nNorth and Montagne Longue, Mrs Savabaddy. \nMrs Savabaddy: Thank you, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker: Do not touch the mike! Do not touch it! \nMrs Savabaddy: I B/74, please! \nSMK NAVIN SOONARANE GYMNASIUM - VOLLEY BALL TOURNAMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/73",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 73,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government —",
      "question": "(No. B/73) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to SMK Navin Soonarane \nGymnasium located at Ebène, he will state if same is still homologated for volley ball \ntournaments and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMONTAGNE LONGUE HOSPITAL - FACILITIES & SERVICES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/74",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 74,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness —",
      "question": "(No. B/74) Mrs A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Montagne \nLongue Hospital, he will state the – \n(a) \noperating hours thereof; \n(b) \nfacilities available and services provided thereat, and \n(c) \nnumber of patients treated thereat over the last two years.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, the Long Mountain Hospital is classified as a district \nhospital falling under SSRN regional hospital and caters for a population of 28,233. \nIn regard to part (a) of the question, the hospital is open seven days a week. The \nsorted outpatient department and dental services operate from 09.00 hrs in the morning to \n16.00 hrs on weekdays and 09.00 hrs in the morning to noon on Saturdays. The \nhaemodialysis unit operates from 08.00 hrs in the morning to 9.00 p.m. during weekdays and \nfrom 08.00 hrs in the morning to noon on Saturdays. The Accident and Emergency \nDepartment and the Nénuphar Rehabilitation Centre, where patients 18 years and above \nsuffering from drug addiction are catered for, operate only on a 24/7 basis. \n\n69 \n \nMadam Speaker, in regard to part (b) of the question, the following facilities and \nservices available at the hospital are – \n(i) \nAccident and emergency; \n(ii) \nAmbulance services; \n(iii) \nDietician clinic; \n(iv) \nEndocrinology clinic; \n(v) \nHaemodialysis; \n(vi) \nMetadone clinic; \n(vii) \nThe outpatient department serves chronic and stable patients referred to from \nSSRN for follow-up care in these departments, which include Cardiology, \nChest Diseases, Dermatology, Diabetology, ENT, General Medicine, General \nSurgery, NCD, Obstetrics, Orthopaedics, Paediatrics, Physical Medicine, \nPsychiatry, eight pharmacy services, 9 Rheumatology clinic, 10 tobacco \ncessation clinics, 11 vaccinations for children and adults, and 12 well-baby \nclinics. In 2022 and 2023, the hospital treated 54,358 and 66,378 patients \nrespectively. \nMadam Speaker, we have noted that the pharmacy department has been operating \nfrom 08.00 hrs in the morning till 10.00 hrs for a long period. Patients who arrive after 08.00 \nhrs in the evening either obtain their medicines from SSRN or return the next morning. The \noption of providing 24/7 pharmacy services is being looked into. Madam Speaker, I am \nfurther apprised that the following shortcomings were noted during a site visit carried out \nrecently – \n(a) \nThe yard requires proper upkeep and the regional health services \nadministrator has been urged to address this matter urgently. Road markings, \ncurb painting and parking works are in progress. Additionally, there is a need \nfor lopping and trimming of branches for which approval has already been \ngranted by the conservator of forest and funds have accordingly been \nearmarked.  \nThe parking facilities are being looked into – these 47 additional new parking \nslots and the reinstatement of 20 existing parking spaces. A survey has been \n\n70 \n \ncompleted, and funds will be allocated once the Ministry of National \nInfrastructure and Community Development provides its recommendation. \n(b) \nThe exterior painting of the hospital has been completed, while interior \npainting is ongoing and is expected to be finished by the end of December.  \n(c) \nRoof leakages at the Nénuphar Detoxification Centre and haemodialysis unit \nare being repaired, and works are expected to be completed by the end of the \nmonth. There is a defective air conditioning unit in the pharmacy store as well \nas in the consultation room No. 1, which are currently under evaluation.  \nAdditionally, there are no air conditioning units in three other consultation \nrooms, which is being looked into by the concerned head of units. \n(d) \nThe old wooden building housing the linen room needs to be demolished. The \nconstruction of a new linen shed had been included in the list of projects \nsubmitted to the Project Implementation Unit. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Caserne: Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Do not touch! Do not touch! \nMr Caserne: La région de Montagne Longue qui fait souvent face à des coupures \nd’électricité et l’hôpital de Montagne Longue n’étant pas équipés d’un générateur, may I ask \nthe hon. Minister whether he will look into the matter so that improvement can be brought to \nthis hospital? \nMr Bachoo: Okay, I will look into the issue. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Maybe I shall guide you as to the use of the mike. \nEven I did a mistake. It cannot cross in my case. You should not touch the mike; you just \nspeak. C’est très très performant. Just speak.  \nHon. Members: C’est sensible! \nMadam Speaker: Sensible, mais ça peut être pire si vous touchez. Je sais que c’est \ntrès tentant de le faire, mais ne le faites pas, s’il vous plaît.  \nHon. Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \nMs Daureeawo: Yes, thank you, Madam Speaker. I B/75. \n\n71 \n \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: I do not know what is going on, on this side. We did not hear you. \nSay it again. \nPUBLIC PLACES - LIFT & ESCALATORS’ SAFETY – INSPECTION & \nMAINTENANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/75",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 75,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Riviere des Anguilles and Souillac (Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations —",
      "question": "(No. B/75) Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard in regard to \nescalators or lifts placed in public places, he will state if consideration will be given for – \n(a) \nthe regulation thereof to ascertain the safety of such facilities in public places, \nand \n(b) \nregular site visits or inspections to be effected thereon to ascertain the safety \nof the users thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Uteem: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed \nthat the safety of hoists and lifts at places of work is governed by Section 53 of the \nOccupational Safety and Health Act 2005 (OSHA) as well as the Occupational Safety and \nHealth of Lift at Work Regulation 2012, while the safety of escalators at places of work is \ngoverned by Section 54 of the same Act. \nAs per the provisions of Section 53 and 54 of OSHA, every lift and escalator should \nbe examined by a registered machinery inspector who is a registered professional engineer \nregistered at my Ministry and at least once every six months, he has to file an original report \nwith the National Occupational Safety and Health Department of my Ministry. In accordance \nwith Section 62 of OSHA, it is the duty of a registered machinery inspector to inform in \nwriting the employer or self-employed person or owner as the case may be, immediately after \nhaving completed an examination that such equipment is unsuitable for use if the nature of \nany defect is likely to adversely affect the continued safe use of that equipment. \nMadam Speaker, following the very unfortunate incident at Grand Baie, La Croisette, \ninvolving a travelator, my Ministry is considering measures to be taken to improve the safety \nin the use of escalators, lifts and travelators. We are considering a review of the existing \nOccupational Safety and Health of Lift at Work Regulation together with the Occupational \n\n72 \n \nSafety and Health Safety of Escalators at Work Regulations. We are setting up a technical \ncommittee, and we will hold discussions with the various stakeholders. \nI would here like to point out that one of the shortcomings that my Ministry has \ndetected while carrying out these investigations in the inquiry in Grand Baie, La Croisette is \nthat some of these escalators and the travelators – because it was a travelator, not an escalator \n– tapis roulant – they did not have automatic sensors, sensors that will stop the machine \nautomatically throughout the travelators. They have it at the beginning; they have it at the \nend; they do not have it all along. \nThey have a manually operated switch, an emergency switch at the beginning and at \nthe end of the travelators, but they do not have it throughout the travelators. So, this is one \nthing that we are also going to take up with the representative of the manufacturers to see \nhow they can improve the safety of these travelators/escalators.  \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that \nfor the period of 25 November to 12 December of this year, officers of my Ministry carried \nout 29 visits in relation to the use of lifts and escalators at places of work, including shopping \nmalls, where they issued 19 notices and established 10 contraventions. Inspections regarding \nthe use of lifts and escalators at other places of work are ongoing. \n I further wish to inform the House that a total of 3,855 visits at workplaces have been \ncarried out by officers of my Ministry for the period from January 2023 to November 2024. \nDuring visits at places of work, officers of my Ministry have ensured that employers are \ncomplying with the provisions of current legislation, including provisions pertaining to lifts \nand escalators.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. \nThe hon. Fourth Member of Port Louis North and Montagne Longue is not here. I \nsuppose he will get a written reply. \nHon. Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \nMOLNUPIRAVIR CAPSULES – PROCUREMENT – INQUIRY \n\n73",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-december-2024"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/76",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 76,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member of Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and) Consumer Protection —",
      "question": "(No. B/76) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member of Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the \nproposed reduction in the price of Mogas and diesel, he will state where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Reply: There has already been a decrease of Rs5 per litre in the retail prices of Mogas \nand diesel on 13 December 2024. \n \nRODRIGUES – VULNERABLE FAMILIES – NEW SHELTER POLICY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/77",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 77,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Riviere des Anguilles and Souillac (Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness —",
      "question": "(No. B/77) Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the procurement of \n1,000,000 Molnupiravir capsules at Rs79.92 each, he will state if – \n(a) \nan inquiry is being conducted thereinto by his Ministry and, if so, indicate if the \nreport will be made public, and  \n(b) \nany Police enquiry has been initiated thereinto and/or case lodged before the court \nin relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I am informed that on 07 December 2021, the Ministry \nawarded a contract to CPN Distributors Ltd. through emergency procurement method for the \nsupply of 999,000 capsules of Molnupiravir at a total price of Rs79,840,000.80, that is, at \nRs79.92 per unit.  \nI am also informed that no enquiry was conducted at the level of the Ministry in this \ncase. As of mid-December 2021, the then Independent Commission Against Corruption had \nstarted an investigation on contracts awarded for the procurement of Molnupiravir tablets for \nthe treatment of COVID-19 patients.  \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that the Police are not enquiring \ninto any case relating to the procurement of Molnupiravir capsules. However, there is an \nongoing investigation at the level of the Financial Crimes Commission, formerly ICAC. At \nthis stage, no formal charge has yet been lodged before any law court.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nHon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 13 – DRAINS MAINTENANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/78",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 78,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Riviére des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure —",
      "question": "(No. B/78) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the maintenance \nof drains in Constituency No. 13, Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the Land Drainage Authority, information as to where matters \nstand therefor in view of the upcoming rainy season, indicating the amount disbursed since \nJanuary 2020 to date. \n\n74",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Land Drainage Authority that \nConstituency No. 13, Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac, covers an extent of some 150 km of \ndrain network, out of which some 69 km fall under the purview of the District Council of \nSavanne and about 36 km under the purview of the Road Development Authority for cleaning \nand maintenance. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed for the financial year 2023-2024, funding \nallocated to the District Council of Savanne for cleaning of drains and disilting of rivers was \nas follows – \n• \nRs2.5 m. allocated for cleaning of drains; \n• \nRs28 m. for disilting of rivers, and  \n• \nRs6.7 m. for cleaning of drains post Cyclone Belal.  \nMadam Speaker, a maintenance plan was submitted by the LDA to the District Council \nof Savanne on 29 July 2024. As at date, 19 km of drains, out of the 69 km, have been \ncleaned, and desilting works along 11 km river watercourses have been carried out by the \nSavanne District Council. \nWith your permission, Madam Speaker, I am tabling a copy of the maintenance plan.  \nMadam Speaker, the RDA, on its part, has already cleaned some 7.5 km of drains, and \naround 800 metres are left to be cleaned as per its programme for the current financial year. \nThe total amount spent by the District Council and the RDA since January 2020 to date for \ncleaning of drains and desilting of rivers in Constituency No. 13 is to the tune of some Rs24 \nm. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that together with my colleague, the \nMinister of Local Government, and the Junior Minister of Local Government, I chaired a \nmeeting with representatives of all the local authorities and other implementing agencies on \n05 December 2024 to take stock of the cleaning and desilting of canals, rivers and drains \nundertaken so far. These agencies have been pressed upon to give due attention to complete \nthe remaining works in view of the ongoing rainy season. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \n\n75 \n \nMr Jhummun: Madam Speaker, can the hon. Minister inform the House whether he is \nhappy with the way the works have been done since billions of the public money have been \ndrained in the drains by the previous government? Thank you. \nMr Gunness: Madam Speaker, as I said, we are never satisfied. Obviously, we spend a \nlot of money on drain projects, but follow-up for the cleaning of drains, I must tell you, is not \ndone properly. What is the use of constructing drains when afterwards, there is no cleaning of \nthe drains? So, now, we will ensure that proper cleaning of the drains is carried out regularly. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister.  \nHon. Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka! \nCITÉ MYOSOTIS, ST PIERRE – PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE – RECONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/79",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 79,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure —",
      "question": "(No. B/79) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the pedestrian bridge used \nby the inhabitants of St Pierre Centre and Cité Myosotis to go to the St Pierre Roman \nCatholic Aided School and which was damaged during the passage of cyclone Belal in \nJanuary 2024, he will state – \n(a) \nwhere matters stand as to the reconstruction thereof, indicating the reason for the \ndelay therefor, and \n(b) \nif a risk assessment has been carried out whereby pedestrians in particular, \nchildren who have to cross the river without any security protection to attend \nschool.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, I am informed that Cité Myosotis is cut off from St \nPierre Centre and St Pierre RCA School by River Profonde. At present, in order to get access \nto the school and other facilities in the village, the inhabitants need to travel around 1 km \nthrough an existing bridge, as the pedestrian bridge being referred to in the question has been \ndamaged since 2017. The reconstruction of same was included in NDU’s list of projects for \nthe financial year 2017-2018. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, following completion of design and \ngeotechnical investigation, a bidding exercise was carried out by the NDU in November 2023 \n\n76 \n \nfor the appointment of a contractor for the reconstruction of the footbridge at Cité Myosotis, \nSaint-Pierre. \nFollowing evaluation of bids received, the exercise was cancelled, as the amount \nquoted by the lowest evaluated responsive bidder was substantially higher than the cost \nestimated by 33%. Subsequently, the cost estimate was reviewed, and a second bidding \nexercise was undertaken by the NDU in July 2024. Again, the amount quoted by the lowest \nevaluated responsive bidder was higher than the cost estimate by 38%. The exercise had to be \ncancelled once again. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that in January 2024, with the passage of \nCyclone Belal, the pedestrian bridge has been almost demolished, causing more hardship to \nthe inhabitants. The new bridge to be constructed will be 27 metres long, having a width of 2 \nmetres, and will be raised to a height of 4.5 metres from the riverbed. In view of the rise of \nthe cost of materials and the volatility of the market, the cost estimate of the project is being \nreviewed anew, following which financial clearance will be sought prior to the launching of \nbids. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (b) of the question, I am informed that no risk \nassessment has been carried out by my Ministry. In fact, the pedestrian bridge is damaged to \nthe extent that it cannot be used to cross the river.  \nNevertheless, I have already requested my colleague, the Minister of Local \nGovernment, to inform the District Council of Moka to ensure that the public has no access to \nthe damaged bridge.  \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Hon. Second Member for Grand’ Baie \nand Poudre d’Or! \nMELLE JEANNE, MADAME AZOR, MELVILLE & POUDRE D’OR VILLAGE – \nIRREGULAR TRANSPORT SERVICES – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-december-2024"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/80",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 80,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport —",
      "question": "(No. B/80) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to irregular transport services in the \nregions of Melle Jeanne, Madame Azor, Melville and Poudre D’Or Village, he will state the \nmeasures being envisaged to remedy same. \n\n77",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the National Land \nTransport Authority that buses plying along Routes 187 and 178 serve the regions of Melle \nJeanne, Madame Azor, Melville, and Poudre D’Or Village.  \nAccordingly, a shuttle service is currently being provided by one individual bus \noperator along Route 187, that is, from Melle Jeanne to Goodlands and back from 6 o’clock \nin the morning to 6 o’clock in the afternoon at an interval of 30 minutes during peak time and \none hour during off-peak time. \nAs regards Route 178, that is, Melville to Goodlands via Madame Azor with extension \nto Poudre D’Or, there are six individual bus operators licensed to operate thereat. However, \ntwo of these buses have been off-road for approximately three months now due to serious \nbreakdowns, and this could be the source of prompting this Parliamentary Question from the \nhon. Beejan. However, I have to stress that the remaining four buses are presently operating \nat an average interval of 30 minutes from 6 o’clock in the morning to 6 o’clock in the \nafternoon. \nMadam Speaker, with a view to alleviating the hardship of commuters in these regions, \na shuttle service has recently been introduced, and same is being provided by a 32-seater bus \nfrom the National Transport Corporation from Madame Azor to Goodlands between 6 \no’clock in the morning and 6 o’clock in the evening during weekdays only. \nI am also informed that a temporary Road Service Licence has been granted to an \nindividual bus operator in accordance with section 77 D of the Road Traffic Act since 19 \nSeptember 2024 to increase the fleet of buses along Route 178 and same should be \nimplemented before the end of this month. So, this should somehow bring some relief. It is \nbelieved that this will address the level of service. But still, I would request the hon. Member \nto follow-up and update me in due course. So, I rely on hon. Beejan for feedback if this is not \nworking at the end of this month. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Beejan: Could the Minister inform the House whether consideration will be given \nfor officers to effect regular surprise checks so as to ensure that there is no abuse by transport \noperators in the region of Melle Jeanne, Melville, Madame Azor and Poudre D’Or Village? \n\n78 \n \nMr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I can certainly ask the National Land \nTransport Authority inspectorate to maintain regular checks and to see whether the situation \nis okay. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes, hon. Second Member for Vieux \nGrand Port and Rose Belle. \nCYCLONE BELAL – DAMAGED MOTOR VEHICLES – COMPENSATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/81",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 81,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning —",
      "question": "(No. B/81) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to motor \nvehicles damaged during the passage of cyclone Belal, she will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Financial Services Commission, information as to the criteria used to \ndetermine the extent and cost of repairs thereof, indicating – \n(a) \nthe total amount of funds disbursed therefor;  \n(b) \nother type of compensation paid, if any, and \n(c) \nif insurance companies were involved in the assessment of all individual \nclaims prior to payment being effected to the victims and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Dr. Mrs Jeetun: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Financial Services \nCommission that following damages sustained by several motor vehicles during flooding \ncaused by Cyclone Belal on 15 January 2024, the then Government, on 19 January 2024, \ndecided to compensate vehicle owners whose vehicles were affected through the FSC. This \nwas an exceptional situation for the Commission, which, as a regulator, does not normally \nmake payments with respect to insurance claims. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the FSC that the eligibility criteria for the payment \nof compensation to beneficiaries were determined by the FSC in consultation with the \nInsurers Association of Mauritius and officers of the Ministry of Finance, Economic Planning \nand Development. Initially vehicles owned by private individuals which were present on \nroads, at workplaces or at public places were eligible for compensation, which was further \nextended to micro and small enterprises having turnover not exceeding Rs30 m. \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed by the FSC that compensation paid for cases of \ncomprehensive insurance cover represented the depreciated amount, that is, the gap between \n\n79 \n \nthe market value and the sum assured, and the policy excess for vehicles classified as total \nloss by insurance companies, whereas for cases where the vehicles could be repaired, the \npolicy excess only was compensated. \nAs for cases of vehicles classified as total loss under third-party insurance cover, the \ndifference between pre-accident value and salvage cost, that is, the residual value of the scrap \nvehicle as determined by independent motor surveyor and Government Valuer was paid as \ncompensation. For cases where the vehicles could be repaired, the cost of repairs as \ndetermined by the motor surveyor and Government Valuer was compensated. \nMadam Speaker, with respect to part (a) of the question, the total amount of funds \ndisbursed by the FSC as per the aforementioned criteria as of to date is Rs58,640,344 \nrepresenting 1163 flooded vehicle cases. \nWith respect to part (b) of the question, Madam Speaker, I am informed by the FSC \nthat no other type of compensation was paid to the beneficiaries. \nAs regards part (c) of the question, I wish to inform the House that for those vehicles \nunder comprehensive insurance cover, the onus was on the insurance companies to assess \nindividual claims prior to payment being effected to victims as per the established criteria, \nwhereas in the case of third-party insurance cover, the services of independent motor \nsurveyors and Government Valuers from the Ministry of Infrastructure were also returned by \nthe FSC to reassess surveys done by independent motor surveyors as a control mechanism. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. I have now the hon. First Member for \nSavanne and Black River. \nSMART CLINICS LTD – STATE LAND LEASE – BLACK RIVER",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/82",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 82,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands —",
      "question": "(No. B/82) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Housing and Lands whether he will state if the company Smart Clinics has \nobtained the lease of two arpents of Pas Géometrique at Colonel Dean Street in Black River \nand, if so, table the conditions of the lease agreement therefor. \nThe Minister Information Technology, Communication and Innovation (Dr. A. Ramtohul): Madam Speaker, I presume that the hon. Member is referring to the Smart \nClinics Ltd. Madam Speaker, I am informed Smart Clinics Ltd was in May 2018 granted a \n\n80 \n \n60-year industrial lease over a plot of State land of an extent of 1 arpent 75 perches, being \npart of the Pas Géometrique at Grande Rivière Noire for the setting up of a wellness medical \nclinic and residential care home for retired persons. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that following an application from Smart \nClinics Ltd for a change in purpose to a dental and wellness medical clinic, restaurant and \napartments for sale under vente en état futur d’achèvement through règlement de copropriété, \nthe lease was accordingly amended in September 2021.  \nMadam Speaker, with your permission, I am tabling a copy of each of the two lease \nagreements. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes.",
      "answer": "Mr Babajee: Madam Speaker, is the Minister aware of a court case against the \nMinistry of Housing and Lands where the previous owner is seeking damages for Rs1 billion \nand whether he will review the process of terminating the previous owner’s lease as a \nprecautionary measure, as we all know that the previous government has been terminating \ncontracts and leases and dilapidating public funds? \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister. \nDr. Ramtohul: In reply, Madam Speaker, to the supplementary question, I shall \narrange to have a list of the court case rulings to be laid in the Library of the National \nAssembly. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much.  \nThe hon. Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D’Or. \nCONSTITUENCY NO.6 – FOOTBALL & OTHER PLAYGROUNDS – PENALTY \nFEES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/83",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 83,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports —",
      "question": "(No. B/83) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to football pitch and other \nplaygrounds, in particular, in the regions of Grand Bay and Petit Raffray falling under the \npurview of his Ministry, he will state if consideration will be given for the waiving of fees \npayable to access same. \n\n81",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that upon assuming \noffice, I have requested officers of my Ministry to consider the waiving of fees payable by \nusers of football pitches and other playgrounds falling under our purview. This will be in line \nwith our objective of encouraging more of our citizens to engage in the practice of sport and \nphysical activities. In this context, officers of my Ministry are actively looking into the \nimplications of such a measure, and consultation will thereafter be held with the Minister of \nFinance. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, the hon. Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle! \nCONSTITUENCY NO.11, ROUTE 87 – IRREGULAR BUS SERVICES – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/84",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 84,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport —",
      "question": "(No. B/84) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the irregular bus services in the \nregions of St Hubert, St Hilaire, Beau Jardin and Deux Bras, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information as to whether \nconsideration will be given for the provision of a regular bus service along Route No 87 St \nHubert/Curepipe and Route No 11 St Hubert/Mahebourg, respectively.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the National Land \nTransport Authority that there are six buses owned by individual bus operators which are \nlicensed to operate along Route 87, that is, St Hubert-Curepipe via St Hubert, Beau Jardin \nand Deux Bras. However, only four of them are providing their services. One bus has attained \nthe age of 20 years since April 2023 and has not been replaced, while the licence of the \nsecond bus has been revoked since 09 March 2023 following several recurrent charges, \nincluding ‘failing to observe timetable and performing special road trips without permit’, and \nthe case is at the level of the Appeal Committee. \nIn order to ensure an adequate level of service thereat, three buses of the National \nTransport Corporation are supplementing the service along the said route. Buses are being \nreleased at intervals of 20 minutes during peak time and 40 minutes during off-peak. \nAdditionally, one school service is performed by the NTC in the morning at 06:55 hrs from \nSt Hubert and 14:10 hrs in the afternoon from Curepipe. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that since the introduction of NTC buses \nalong Route 87, the number of complaints pertaining to the said route has decreased. With \nregard to bus service along Route 11, that is, St Hubert-Mahebourg via St Hubert, Beau \n\n82 \n \nJardin and Grand Bel Air, I am informed that six individually owned buses are licensed to \noperate thereat, and all of them are providing service. It is to be noted that one of them is \noperating on a temporary basis following approval conveyed on 30 April 2024 in accordance \nwith section 77(d) of the Road Traffic Act to improve the level of service thereat. \nBuses along Route 11 are currently being released at an interval of 20 minutes during \npeak time and 30 minutes during off-peak. A short service is also provided every morning \nfrom Grand Bel Air to Mahebourg at 7.20 in the morning and on school days to cater to the \nneeds of students attending secondary institutions in Mahebourg. As far as specific \ncomplaints along Route 87 and 11 are concerned, I am apprised by the NLTA that \ndisciplinary actions have already been taken against some bus operators while investigations \nand enquiries are ongoing for other cases. \nFurthermore, the NLTA has informed that the demand along the concerned localities is \nconcentrated only during peak hours and the number of travelling passengers during the rest \nof the day is marginal. The NLTA has been requested to closely monitor the operation of \nbuses thereat and to come up with additional remedial measures to improve the situation of \ncommuters. \nWith your permission, Madam Speaker, and in order to save the time of the House, I \nam tabling the details of the timetable in respect of Routes 87 and 11, please. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you Minister. Yes, hon. Mr Ramdass ! \nMr Ramdass: Madame la présidente, ces deux routes 11 et 87 respectivement – de ce \nque je comprends – sont desservies en partie par la NTC et en partie par les opérateurs \nd’autobus privés. Et de ce que je comprends, à ce jour, le plus gros souci, qui dure depuis des \nannées déjà, demeure relatif aux opérateurs privés qui, de loin, ne fournissent pas un service \nrégulier comme convenu.  \nWould the hon. Minister – of course, I have taken note of the reply given by the hon. \nMinister – consider the possibility or the advisability of taking up the matter with the NLTA \nso that regular inspection is carried out in order so that the inhabitants of St Hilaire, St Hubert \nand Beau Jardin are provided with a decent regular service? \nMadam Speaker: I am sure he will! \n\n83 \n \nMr Osman Mahomed: I certainly will, and I also rely on the hon. Member that after \nthe NLTA has carried out the inspection, should he still not be satisfied, to get back to me. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Third Member for Rodrigues!  \nRISING COSTS OF COMMODITIES – FINANCIAL RELIEF",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/85",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 85,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and) Consumer Protection —",
      "question": "(No. B/85) Mrs D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the \nMinister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the high increase in \naverage prices of selected commodities, he will state if – \n(a) \nhis Ministry proposes to introduce any new policy, subsidy or financial relief \npackage aimed at supporting vulnerable populations, such as low-income \nhouseholds and small businesses, and  \n(b) \nconsideration will be given to extend same to Rodrigues due to the high freight \nrate resulting in higher increase in prices.",
      "answer": "Mr Yeung Sik Yuen: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to \napprise the House that my Ministry is presently working on a new policy to address the issue \nof rising costs of commodities. To that effect, I have already chaired several meetings with \nrepresentatives of the Ministry of Finance and other stakeholders with a view to define the \nnew policy. Discussions are still ongoing. This new policy will also include extending the \npresent range of products commercialised by the STC. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I wish to reassure the House that the new policy \nwill also extend to Rodrigues, along with the new range of products. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes, hon. Third Member for Port Louis \nSouth and Port Louis Central! \nNATIONAL CANCER CENTRE – UNUSED MEDICAL EQUIPMENT – ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/86",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 86,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness —",
      "question": "(No. B/86) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the diagnostic and \ntherapeutic equipment lying dormant at the National Cancer Centre, he will state if – \n(a) \na report on the status thereof was carried out in July 2024 and, if so, by whom, \nindicating the actions taken, if any, at the material time, and  \n\n84 \n \n(b) \nthe recent visit effected thereat revealed any progress as to the use thereof, \nindicating the number thereof found defective.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, in reply to part (a) of the question, I am informed that no \nsite visit was effected in July 2024. Instead, a preliminary site visit was carried out by a team \nof specialists and technicians on 4 October 2024. It was then observed that there was several \nunused medical equipment at the National Cancer Centre comprising motorised beds, ICU \nventilators, syringe pumps, high-end central monitoring systems, multi-parameter patient \nmonitors, amongst others. \nSubsequently, an extended team of officers comprising the consultant in charge, \nanaesthesia; the Neonatal and Paediatric Respiratory Therapist; the Superintendent \nHealthcare Technology Workshop; two Biomedical Engineers; three Senior Healthcare \nTechnologists, and a Procurement and Supply Officer carried out a detailed survey and drew \na list of unused therapeutic and diagnostic equipment at the National Cancer Centre, \nindicating functionalities to date. The survey was carried out from 19 to 22 November 2024, \nand the report was submitted on 28 November 2024. A list of the unused medical equipment \nis being tabled accordingly. \nMadam Speaker, in reply to part (b) of the question, I carried out a site visit at the \nNational Cancer Centre along with officers of my Ministry on 02 December 2024 to take \ncognisance of the unused medical equipment. I was apprised that some of these unused \nmedical equipment were faulty and needed calibration. Action has been initiated to draw a \nlist of equipment that would be utilised at the National Cancer Centre, while the remaining \nunused medical equipment will be redistributed to the regional hospitals as per their \nrespective requirements. Additionally, some major equipment were not operational, namely – \n• \none PET Scan; \n• \none brachytherapy, and \n• \none LINAC machine. \nThe PET scan requires alignment and calibration. Moreover, there was a reported delay \nin the delivery of consumables. The brachytherapy will be a functional shortage with \noperationalisation at the operations theatre. As for the LINAC machine, one has already been \ninstalled while the other is being installed. Both these machines will be functional by mid-\nJanuary 2025. \n\n85 \n \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that due to a scarcity of anaesthetists and other \nspecialised staff to run the operations theatre, the diagnostic and therapeutic equipment were \nnot being utilised. Active consideration is being given to launching the new onco surgery \noperations theatre with a new multidisciplinary team of local experienced specialists as of \nJanuary 2025. \nMadam Speaker, I am pleased to announce that the multidisciplinary team at the \nNational Cancer Centre will be assisted by a foreign oncosurgeon team, headed by Dr. \nSriprakash Duraisamy from Chennai, India. He is a renowned consultant with more than 10 \nyears of experience in oncology. \nMadam Speaker: I will call the next question which is the last one. Time is almost \nover. Sorry, hon. Dr. Aumeer. \nHon. Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! That is the last question! \nHon. Ms Daureeawo! \nPOLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE BILL – INTRODUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/87",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 87,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Riviere des Anguilles and Souillac (Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Attorney-General —",
      "question": "(No. B/87) Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Attorney General whether, in regard to the Police and Criminal Evidence \nBill, he will state if consideration will be given for the introduction thereof on a priority basis \nat the National Assembly and, if so, the expected date thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Glover: Madam Speaker, I have taken cognisance of the draft Police and Criminal \nJustice Bill which was prepared in 2019 under the previous government. I understand that in \n2019, the draft Bill was circulated to the Commissioner of Police, the Director of Public \nProsecutions and the Forensic Lab for their views and comments. It was then proposed that \nthe final version of the Bill would be circulated and given due publicity for the views of the \njudiciary, law practitioners and the public at large. Unfortunately, this was not done. \nFurthermore, during the last legislature, my predecessor had informed the House that \nthe reconceptualisation of that draft Bill was being undertaken. However, I have seen nothing \nof the sort. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to reassure the House that the introduction of a Police and \nCriminal Evidence Bill or a derivative thereof is indeed on the list of priorities of this \n\n86 \n \nGovernment. You will recall, under the previous leadership of the hon. Prime Minister, the \nPolice and Criminal Evidence Bill was introduced in the National Assembly on 16 April 2013 \nfor First Reading. However, the National Assembly was then prorogued, and that Bill never \nwent through. \nTo achieve an effective and modern reform of our criminal justice system, Madam \nSpeaker, we shall, once again, seek the collaboration of and have meaningful consultations \nwith all relevant stakeholders, including the all-important Law Reform Commission, the \nOffice of the Director of Public Prosecutions, the Commissioner of Police and the Forensic \nLab. All stakeholders must work together in close coordination in view of preparing that \nimportant piece of legislation.  \nWe shall not only address the needs of our society but also uphold and safeguard the \nrights of every citizen in the country. It is imperative that all strive to establish a robust, \ncomprehensive legal framework for our criminal justice system. One that embraces emerging \ntechnological advancements but also ensures the harmonisation of all relevant legislations \nand their effective implementation. \nMadam Speaker, to develop a new draft of the Bill, one that meets the highest standards \nand serves the nation effectively for years to come, the extensive collaboration of all relevant \nstakeholders is primordial. This process, by its very nature, will require careful deliberation \nand time. So, it would be presumptuous to give a timeline. The House will have to be \nindulgent and give me and my office the time needed to produce what will become one of the \nmost significant pieces of legislation for our criminal justice system this side of the \nmillennium. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Nous allons donner le temps au temps. \nNow, time is over for questions! I have been advised that two Parliamentary Questions \nhave been withdrawn: I B/91 and I B/92. \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that all the business on today’s \nOrder Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10. \n\n87 \n \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nSTATEMENT BY MINISTER \n(4.06 p.m.) \nCHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO – SOVEREIGNTY – DRAFT AGREEMENT  \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I have a short Statement \nto make on Chagos Archipelago. \nMadam Speaker, further to my Statement on 29 November 2024, whereby I informed \nthe House that I had asked for an independent review of the draft agreement which was \nproposed by the UK and agreed by the former Government on the exercise of sovereignty \nover the Chagos Archipelago, I wish to inform the House that the independent review has \nbeen completed and that the opinions submitted by the legal advisers have been considered \nby an Inter-Ministerial Committee chaired by me, which included the Deputy Prime Minister, \nthe Attorney General, and the Minister of Foreign Affairs. \nMadam Speaker, following the letter which the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom \naddressed to me on 12 November 2024 and the meeting which I had with Mr Jonathan \nPowell, who is the UK National Security Adviser, on 25 November 2024, a delegation of \nsenior officials from the United Kingdom came to Mauritius last week for further discussions \nwith the Mauritian authorities.  \nApart from meetings which were held between senior officials from Mauritius and the \nUnited Kingdom, the Head of the UK delegation called upon me.  \nDuring the discussions, Mauritius made it clear that while it is still willing to conclude \nan agreement with the United Kingdom, the draft agreement which was shown to us after the \nGeneral Elections is one which, in our view, would not produce the benefits that the nation \ncould expect from such an agreement.  \nTherefore, Mauritius accordingly submitted counterproposals to the UK so that an \nagreement which is in the best interests of Mauritius can be concluded. \n\n88 \n \nThe response of the United Kingdom to our counterproposals was received yesterday \nafternoon and is now being currently considered. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nPUBLIC BILLS \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the following Bills were read a first time – \n(a) \nThe Employment Relations (Amendment) Bill (No. XIX of 2024) \n(b) \nThe Special Allowance Bill (No. XX of 2024) \n \nSecond Reading \nTHE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS (AMENDMENT) BILL  \n(NO. XIX OF 2024) \nOrder for Second Reading read. \n(4.09 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations (Mr R. Uteem): Madam Speaker, I \nmove that the Employment Relations (Amendment) Bill (No. XIX of 2024) be read a second \ntime. \nMadame la présidente, j’ai l’honneur et le privilège de présenter le premier projet de loi \nde l’Alliance du Changement après notre victoire historique aux dernières élections \ngénérales. La très grande majorité des électeurs et la population dans son ensemble ont placé \nleur espoir en notre équipe, et nous ferons de notre mieux pour être à la hauteur de leurs \nattentes.  \nEt c’est tout un symbole, Madame la présidente, que les deux premiers projets de loi à \nl’ordre du jour visent à améliorer les conditions de vie des travailleurs de ce pays. Tout un \nsymbole, car tout d’abord, le Parti travailliste, Labour Party, comme ce nom l’indique, a pris \n\n89 \n \nnaissance en 1936 précisément pour défendre la cause des travailleurs. Un combat repris par \nle Mouvement militant mauricien, le MMM, qui a beaucoup œuvré pour la reconnaissance et \nle respect des droits des travailleurs, tout comme Rezistans ek Alternativ qui a toujours milité \ncomme syndicaliste pour le bien-être des travailleurs. Et aujourd’hui, nous sommes rejoints \ndans notre combat par les Nouveaux Démocrates. \nMadame la présidente, le projet de loi devant la Chambre aujourd’hui consiste à \namender the Employment Relations Act afin de donner au ministre du Travail le pouvoir de \nréglementer le paiement de salaires additionnels suite à l’introduction ou à la révision du \nsalaire minimum. Le ministre pourra, dès lors, à travers des regulations, rendre obligatoire le \npaiement d’un salaire additionnel pour rétablir la relativité salariale dans le secteur privé. \nÀ chaque fois qu’on fixe un nouveau salaire minimum, il faut aussi ajuster les salaires \ndes autres employés pour maintenir la relativité salariale, notamment pour prendre en \nconsidération le temps de service des employés existants et leurs grades. \nSous les lois existantes, il y a deux façons de procéder pour l’ajustement des salaires \nsuite à l’introduction du salaire minimum. Dans le premier cas, le National Wage \nConsultative Council peut faire des recommandations au ministre du Travail, c’est l’une de \nses fonctions prévues expressément à l’article 5(b)(v) et 5(b)(vi) du National Wage \nConsultative Council Act de 2016.  \nDans le deuxième cas, le ministre peut, sous l’article 93 de l’Employment Relations Act, \ndemander au National Remuneration Board de lui recommander une nouvelle grille salariale. \nSuite à l’introduction du salaire minimum en janvier 2018, le ministre avait demandé au \nNational Remuneration Board de lui proposer des ajustements au salaire des employés du \nsecteur privé et, suite aux recommandations du NRB en 2022, 17 Remuneration Regulations \nont été amendées. \nCependant, lorsqu’en janvier 2024, le salaire minimum passe à R 16 500, le \ngouvernement sortant choisit de faire fi aux dispositions de la loi et d’adopter une toute autre \nprocédure. Au lieu de demander au National Wage Consultative Council ou au National \nRemuneration Board de venir avec des recommandations pour les ajustements salariaux, le 3 \njuillet 2024, un comité ministériel présidé par le Premier ministre d’alors décide d’instituer \nun Technical Committee sous la présidence de l’Acting Financial Secretary. C’était le 3 \n\n90 \n \njuillet et deux jours après, seulement deux jours après, le 5 juillet 2024, le comité a \nrecommandé une augmentation de R 4 925 par rapport au salaire de 2023. Pas de grille \nsalariale, pas d’études approfondies, pas de consultation avec les représentants des \ntravailleurs et du patronat. \nLe 13 septembre 2024, 32 remuneration regulations furent amendées pour donner effet \naux recommandations du Technical Committee. Ces regulations étaient faites supposément \nsous l’article 106 de l’Employment Relations Act. \nMadame la présidente, les réactions n’ont pas tardé, que ce soit du côté de Business \nMauritius ou de certains syndicalistes, tout le monde a déclaré que le ministre d’alors n’avait \npas le pouvoir d’amender les Remuneration Orders dans les conditions qu’il les avait faites. \nJe me souviens très bien que l’honorable Ashok Subron, en ce temps simple syndicaliste de \nRezistans ek Alternativ, lors d’un rassemblement à Triolet, demandait au gouvernement de \nrappeler le Parlement d’urgence, car selon lui, et il avait raison, les ajustements salariaux \nauraient dû être faits à travers un projet de loi et non à travers des regulations. Mais au lieu de \nrappeler le Parlement, le 24 septembre, le ministre a tout simplement révoqué les 32 \nremuneration regulations seulement pour les remplacer par d’autres regulations identiques, \nmais cette fois-ci faites supposément sous les articles 94 et 106 de l’Employment Relations \nAct. \nMadame la présidente, ce qui devait arriver arriva et, le 9 octobre, quelques jours plus \ntard, Business Mauritius entra une action en Cour suprême pour contester la légalité des 32 \nrèglements. Le lendemain, une entreprise privée, Akhtar Anver Toorawa Ltd, entra aussi une \naction pour contester la légalité du Distributive Trades (Remuneration) (Amendment No. 2) \nRegulations 2024. \nEn conséquence, plusieurs entreprises du privé ont choisi de ne pas payer les salaires \nadditionnels tant que la Cour suprême n’aurait pas tranché sur ces deux affaires. Les deux \naffaires seront appelées pro forma à nouveau au mois de janvier de l’année prochaine. Et ces \naffaires comme vous avez, Madame la présidente, risquent de prendre plusieurs mois, voire \ndes années, avant qu’on ait un jugement final. \nMadame la présidente, dès ma prise de fonction, j’ai rencontré plusieurs syndicalistes \nde même que les représentants de Business Mauritius et tous deux m’ont demandé de trouver \nune solution pour que les travailleurs du secteur privé puissent obtenir le paiement de leurs \n\n91 \n \nsalaires additionnels sans avoir à attendre la délibération de la Cour suprême. Je me suis \nentretenu avec les représentants du State Law Office et, à mon grand étonnement, Madame la \nprésidente, j’ai pris connaissance d’un avis légal du bureau du Solicitor General en date du 2 \nseptembre 2024. Le 2 septembre 2024, c’était une dizaine de jours avant que le ministre \nvienne de l’avant avec ces remuneration regulations, et que dit cet avis légal ?  Je cite un \nextrait – \n“Accordingly, it seems that there is at present no legal basis expressly provided for the \nenactment of regulation to reflect wage relativity adjustment following the review of \nthe National Minimum Wage.” \nNo legal basis.  \n“Additionally, it also appears that there is no legal basis for regulation to be made in \nrespect of employees who are not governed by any remuneration regulation nor for the \nmaking of regulation to provide for national minimum wages for jobs warranting the \npossession of a diploma or degree as entry requirements.” \nTherefore, Madam Speaker, the former Government was well aware that there was no \nexpressed legal basis for the Minister of Labour to make the 32 remuneration regulations \nwhich he made back in September 2024. And today, with this Bill, Madam Speaker, we are \ncorrecting all this so that eligible employees in the private sector can finally get their \nadditional remuneration.  \nNow turning to the provisions of the Bill, clause 3 repeals and replaces the existing \nSection 94 of the Employment Rights Act. The new Section 94, subsection (1), is similar to \nthe existing subsection (1) and empowers the Minister to make regulation to reflect payment \nof additional remuneration or national minimum wage or wage adjustment arising from the \nintroduction or review of the national minimum wage in the salary of employees prescribed \nby remuneration orders. \nSubsection (2)(a) of clause 3 gives the Minister express powers to make regulations for \nthe payment of wage adjustment to address the issue of wage relativity, not only with respect \nto remuneration regulations made under section 93 of the Employment Relations Act but also \nin respect of industry or sector activity not covered by the remuneration regulation. I pause \nhere to add this, Madam Speaker, that this is an extremely important amendment that is being \nproposed, and it is an amendment that has been requested time and again by the trade \n\n92 \n \nunionists because up to now, only employees working in industries and sectors that were \ngoverned by remuneration regulations were eligible to get salary adjustment. But with this \namendment, the Minister will also be able to provide for the payment of additional salary to \nthose employees in the private sector that are not covered by remuneration regulations. \nHowever, a word of caution: such wide powers should be used judiciously and not \narbitrarily. In practice, the Minister should rely on recommendations of the National \nRemuneration Board or the Wage Consultative Council before making any regulations. \nSubsection (2)(b) empowers the Minister to make regulation to provide for a monthly \nminimum basic wage for employees holding a diploma or post-HSC first degree where the \nentry requirements for the job so require. You will recall that such provision was not \nprovided for in the law as per the advice tendered by the State Law Office. \nThe proposed minimum monthly basic wage will be Rs23,000 for a job requiring an \nemployee to possess a diploma and Rs25,000 for a job requiring an employee to possess a \npost-HSC first degree. Subsection (4) provides that the 32 remuneration regulations that were \npassed in September shall be deemed to have been made under this Act, thereby eliminating \nany doubt as to their legality. \nClause 5 of the Bill provides for the coming into operation of the above provisions with \neffect as from 01 July 2014. With the coming into force of this Bill, eligible employees in the \nprivate sector will be paid an additional salary retrospectively as from 01 July 2024. \nMadam Speaker, it was necessary for Government to come with this Bill first before \npassing the Special Allowance Bill which is also on today’s Order Paper, because we want to \nmake sure that the Special Allowance that which will be based on a worker’s basic salary, \nshould include the adjustment to that basic salary as per the amendment that is being brought \ntoday in this House with this Bill. \nWith these words, I commend the Bill to the House. Thank you. \nDr. Boolell rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: I think at this time, we can move for a break for tea. We can come \nback unless, is that alright? Is it okay? We all go for tea and then come back? \n\n93 \n \nMr Lesjongard: You decide, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, but I like consensus. Since you are here, I like consensus. \nAlright, let’s break for tea for half an hour. \nAt 4.22 p.m. the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.01 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Please be seated! Hon. Leader of the Opposition! \n(5.01 p.m.) \nThe Leader of the Opposition (Mr G. Lesjongard): Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, \nSir. \nM. le président, je n’ai pas eu l’occasion de vous féliciter, permettez-moi de le faire cet \naprès-midi. \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Merci. \nMr Lesjongard: M. le président, comme l’a dit le ministre qui a présenté ce projet de \nloi, c’est le tout premier projet de loi de ce nouveau gouvernement ; un projet de loi certes qui \nest simple, mais nécessaire dans le sens qu’il découle des décisions prises par l’ancien \ngouvernement à la suite de l’introduction du salaire minimum qui remonte à 2018, et cela fait \nsuite, je comprends, aux représentations syndicales que le gouvernement avait introduites en \nréajustant les salaires des employés qui ne touchaient pas le salaire minimum, mais qui \navaient plusieurs années de service tout en ayant un salaire identique avec les nouveaux \nemployés. \nM. le président, l’histoire retiendra que c’est sous un gouvernement MSM que le salaire \nminimum a été introduit. Le Parti travailliste, le MMM qui, à une certaine époque, on doit le \nreconnaître, M. le président, ont lutté pour les droits des travailleurs, mais n’ont pas eu le \ncourage de venir de l’avant avec une telle décision quand ils étaient au pouvoir. Ces derniers \ntemps, M. le président, on parle des énormes pressions exercées sur le gouvernement actuel \npar le patronat concernant le 14ᵉ mois, et tout à l’heure, on viendra dans ces discussions, mais \nimaginez-vous la pression à l’époque quand il fallait introduire le salaire minimum ? Mais il \nfaut le reconnaître, cette mesure a permis à une centaine de milliers de familles de sortir de la \nmisère et de vivre une vie plus décente. \n\n94 \n \nM. le président, l’introduction du salaire minimum a permis de réduire l’écart entre les \ndifférentes classes sociales de notre pays et, de facto, les inégalités dans notre société. C’était \nla vision de l’ancien gouvernement, une politique sociale pour une société plus juste et \naujourd’hui, ce projet de loi, il faut le reconnaître, va dans ce sens. Avec la relativité salariale, \nnous allons diminuer davantage ces inégalités dans la société mauricienne. \nM. le président, j’espère que le ministre du Travail veillera à ce que chaque entreprise \napplique cette loi à la lettre afin justement de réajuster les salaires de leurs employés dans les \ndélais prescrits par la loi. M. le président, à l’annonce de la nouvelle crise salariale en \nseptembre dernier dans les différents secteurs, les syndicats avaient demandé la publication \ndes Remuneration Orders par le National Remuneration Board. C’est-à-dire ces \nRemuneration Orders pour plusieurs secteurs non couverts par le NRB et qui concernent des \ndizaines de milliers d’employés. \nM. le président, je comprends qu’un travail a déjà commencé et que le NRB a proposé \ndes recommandations dans ce sens et je comprends aussi que l’ancien ministre du Travail \nenvisageait de préparer une première ébauche de ce projet de loi afin qu’il n’y ait pas de \ncontestation légale et on a écouté ce que le ministre avait à dire à ce propos. L’ancien \ngouvernement proposait d’apporter des amendements au National Wage Consultative \nCouncil Act afin de permettre à cette instance de faire des recommandations sur la relativité \nsalariale. L’amendement proposé permettrait au ministre de faire des règlements par rapport à \nla relativité salariale à l’avenir. Ce projet de loi, dans sa forme actuelle, je pense ne prend pas \ncela en considération, M. le président. \nM. le président, le revenu minimum garanti comporte deux aspects, c’est-à-dire, et je \nvais essayer d’élaborer dessus pour avoir plus de renseignements de la part du ministre. \nC’est-à-dire qu’il y a deux composants : le salaire minimum et les allocations de la MRA. Il y \na eu une révision du revenu minimum garanti de R 9 000 en 2018 à R 20 000 en juillet 2024 \net, par la suite, une augmentation du salaire minimum à R 16 500 en juillet 2024. Toutefois, \nM. le président, il y a un flou et le ministre concerné, je pense, devrait nous éclairer sur \nl’indexation de la compensation salariale. Est-ce que le revenu minimum garanti passera à R \n20 610 en janvier 2025 ou est-ce que les R 610 payées comme compensation seront incluses \ndans le montant actuel du revenu minimum garanti ? Je pense qu’il est important de nous \ndonner ces informations. \n\n95 \n \nComme je l'ai dit, je ne vais pas être long dans cette intervention, M. le président. \nPermettez-moi de conclure sur cette note politique et peut-être qui ne va pas plaire à tout le \nmonde. L’alliance du changement a obtenu une large victoire aux dernières élections \ngénérales, et cela grâce aux travailleurs de ce pays. Ces mêmes travailleurs qui ont connu, il \nfaut le dire, il y a quelques années de cela la crise du Covid, qui craignaient de perdre leurs \nemplois et qui ont bossé jour et nuit, M. le président, pour redresser l’économie de ce pays, et \nbeaucoup d’entre eux ne bénéficieront pas de la compensation salariale, malheureusement. \nCe que j’ai à dire au gouvernement, c'est qu’il faut honorer les promesses, respecter les \nengagements pris envers les travailleurs de ce pays et donner leur dit… \n(Interruptions) \nJe vais terminer. M. le président, merci. \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you for your speech. Hon. Mr Subron!  \n(5.10 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity (Mr A. Subron): Yes, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I had to change my speech because it was modelled \nfor the Madam Speaker.  \nFirst, allow me to start by saying that history will retain that the first Bill to be \npresented by the new Government of L’Alliance du Changment to this Assembly is directly \nrelated to the living conditions of the working class of the country. This is not a matter of \ncoincidence; it only confirms the deep commitment of the present Government to the \nworking people who labour and toil for this country. \nIndeed, it was the Labour Party which, in 1936, put the issue of national minimum \nwage on the agenda of the working-class struggle in its manifesto on 23 February 1936. It \nwas the MMM which put the sectorial minimum wage on the agenda in the 1970s struggle \nand the struggle for the national minimum wage, I am replying to the hon. Leader of the \nOpposition that has been inserted in our law is the product of the workers’ struggle and the \nunion movement. \nIt’s not the product of any other struggles!  \n\n96 \n \nAs stated in our manifesto, les travailleurs représentent la principale force sociale de \nnotre république et constituent le moteur essentiel de la création de la richesse. L’Alliance du \nChangement leur accordera la reconnaissance qu’ils méritent tout au long de son mandat, pas \nseulement à l’approche des élections ! \nMs Anquetil : Bien envoyé ! \nMr Subron: Secondly, it is an honour for me, as a newly elected member of \nConstituency No. 4 in the National Assembly, under the banner of l’Alliance du Changement \nand coming both from the trade union movement and Rezistans ek Alternativ – a party deeply \nrooted in the working class – to make my first input in this Assembly on a central issue \nconcerning the working class. \nThirdly, before the election, having been a spokesperson of l’Alliance du Changement, \nRezistans ek Alternativ and spokesperson of the trade union movement, I publicly raised the \nissue of incompatibility of the present remuneration regulations on salary readjustment with \nlaw. I cannot but commend the presentation of this Bill by the hon. Minister of Labour.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this Bill, which is proposing to amend Section 99 of the \nEmployment Relations Act, concerns directly some 300,000 employees of the private sector. \nIt aims at legally ensuring and guaranteeing the payment of a wage relativity adjustment of \nup to Rs2,925 to workers of the private sector to partially re-establish their salary relativity \nfollowing the increase of the National Minimum Wage in January 2024. \nThe irresponsibility and lack of respect of the previous government, confining the issue \nof wage relativity adjustment payment to a mere electoral weapon, have opened the door for \nthe jeopardy of the very payment of the salary readjustment. The previous government \nmismanagement on the issue since the increase of the national minimum wage in January \n2024 finally led to the wrongful enactment of 32 remuneration regulations in August and \nSeptember 2024. \nIt is this irresponsibility that has enabled Business Mauritius, the body representing the \nemployers, to challenge the very legality of the payments of wage relativity readjustment in \nthe Supreme Court. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is now an established fact from documents \navailable from the SLO that the previous government went as far as dismissing the legal \nadvice tendered by the State Law Office on this issue. \n\n97 \n \nMy colleague, the hon. Minister mentioned clauses of this letter dated 02 September. \nWithout the enactment of the present Bill, the payments of salary readjustment already \neffected to thousands of workers in the private sector are at the risk of being nullified given \nthe legal challenge raised by employers’ organisations in the Supreme Court.  \nIn addition, the projected payments of salary readjustment to some 40,000 workers not \ncovered by the 32 remuneration regulations will be uncertain without the present amendment \nof Section 99 of the Employment Relations Act. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is in the public interest that this Assembly understands the \nseries of events which have led to the present crisis facing some 300,000 workers. This \nAssembly should be informed that as soon as the national minimum wage was officially \nannounced in November 2023, major trade union confederations of the country, in which I \nwas part, insisted that the then government should in parallel cater to salary relativity \ndifferentials and pay a salary readjustment to all private and public sector workers \naccordingly. \nOn 07 December 2023, the previous government announced that the National Wages \nConsultative Council would produce a report on the same by the end of March 2024. There \nwas no such report, as the National Wages Consultative Council was never requested to \naddress the issue of wage relativity. As stated by my colleague, the hon. Minister of Labour, \nunder the National Wages Consultative Council Act 2016, it is the statutory object of the \nNational Wages Consultative Council to be responsible for making recommendations to the \nMinister on wage relativity. \nThe Act stipulates that, inter alia, the object of the Council should be to make \nrecommendations on the approach to be adopted to address the issue of wage relativity in the \nprivate sector that may arise from the introduction of the national minimum wage in \nremuneration regulations made under the Employment Relations Act. It states to make a \nrecommendation for the introduction of a master conversion table to address the issue of \nwage relativity in the private sector. No official consultation ever took place under the \nprevious government with the trade union movement to discuss the issue of wage relativity. \nIt was only when the electoral dynamics started to unfold that, out of the blue, on 22 \nAugust 2024, the then government, through the GIS, published unofficial remuneration \norders on wage relativity adjustment. A few days later, on 13 September 2024, the 32 \n\n98 \n \nremuneration regulations were officially made under Section 99 of the Employment Relations \nAct. After public outcry from various workers, including the trade union movement and \nOpposition parties, the then government revoked the previous 32 remuneration regulations \nand came with another set of 32 remuneration regulations on 24 September 2024. Now, made \nunder Sections 94 and 106 of the Employment Relations Act. \nAs predicated by many in the union movement, the employers’ organisation didn’t take \nlong to challenge the very legality of all the remuneration regulations made on 24 September \n2024. They decided to enter a Judicial Review in the Supreme Court. It was at this point in \ntime that the l’Alliance du Changement undertook publicly to amend the Employment \nRelations Act to ensure the legality of all wage relativity adjustment payments. \nI am pleased today that this commitment ensuring up to Rs2,925 wage relativity \nadjustment payment to some 300,000 workers is being addressed by this Government in its \nfirst legislative act of the National Assembly. I call on all hon. Members to support this \nhistorical amendment to be brought to the Employment Relations Act.  \nMay I stress that this amendment for the guaranteeing of wage relativity adjustment is \nnot an ad hoc nor a one-off issue but a permanent, lifelong measure where this wage relativity \nadjustment payment will now be legally secured, integrated and consolidated in the basic \nsalary of all private sector workers, thus also impacting other benefits such as the overtime \npayment or retirement benefits. I understand that as soon as this Bill is voted and enacted, the \nMinister will make a new remuneration regulation to ensure that all employees not covered \nby the 32 existing remuneration orders get their wage relativity adjustment payment in due \ncourse. I also understand that the PRB will look more deeply into the wage relativity \nadjustment for all public sector employees in its coming report. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, to conclude, I want to make three general comments - \n(i) \nI want to conclude by reassuring the working people of this country that \ndespite the disastrous economic legacy and blunders of the previous \ngovernment, this, the present Government of Alliance Changement including \nRezistans ek Alternativ, is deeply committed to the safeguard of the interests of \nthe whole of the working people throughout our five-year mandate. \n(ii) \nIn parallel with, we do also welcome any dissenting views on any policy \nmeasures this Government is taking or might take in the future. This is what a \n\n99 \n \nvibrant democratic society is all about. It is within the expression of these \nsocial contradictions and dissenting voices that we can also shape our common \nfuture. \n(iv) \nOn a more philosophical level, in the context of the ongoing debate and \nconcerns in our country and the world, one thing is for sure: there is no \neconomy without the labour of the people, and there is no economy without \nnature and its ecological services. These are the social and ecological \nboundaries and limits any economic model or policies are bound to stay \nwithin. COVID-19 and the climate crisis paradoxically reminded all of \nhumanity of these two obvious facts. \nI wish to thank all hon. Members for their attention and patience. Thank you, Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister, I did not want to interrupt you during \nyour speech, but I am the Deputy Speaker. Thank you, hon. Mr Uteem. \n(5.24 p.m.) \nMr Uteem: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. First of all, let me thank the hon. \nLeader of Opposition and my colleague, hon. Ashok Subron, for intervening on this Bill. I \ncongratulate him for his maiden speech.  \nI don’t have much to add by way of summing up, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, because \nthere is clearly consensus on this Bill to rectify a decision taken by the former government \nwhich was tainted with illegality. The hon. Leader of Opposition seems to suggest that with \nthe coming into force of this Bill, the hon. Minister of Labour will no longer have the power \nto refer the matter to NRB for advice, especially as regards those employees which are not \ncovered by remuneration regulation. This is not correct; what we are doing is the opposite. \nWe are giving a special power to the Minister to come by way of the regulation to regulate \nany sectors, occupations, or industries not covered by the remuneration regulations. \nBut we are not doing away with Section 91 of the Employment Relations Act, which \nallows the Minister to refer to the NRB any issue for their reconsideration. And, in fact, I can \ntell you that the former Minister of Labour, my predecessor, had already, on 03 September, \nreferred the matter to the National Remuneration Board. He made a reference for the creation \n\n100 \n \nof regulations concerning employees not covered by the existing 32 remuneration orders. We \nwill wait to see those recommendations before we come up with the regulation to enable all \nemployees which are not covered in the remuneration regulations to be able to get this \nadditional salary with retrospective effect. \nThe hon. Leader of Opposition also spoke about indexation of salary compensation. \nThis is something that our Government will look into. We have received representation from \ntrade unions to that effect. We will have a technical committee which will look at this \nbecause there are also representations by some trade unionists who think that if you index the \nsalary compensation automatically on the inflation rate, they may not be getting sufficient \ncompensation. So, it is a tricky situation; we are open to suggestions. The minimum wage of \nRs610 is in addition to the basic salary which all workers earning less than Rs50,000 earn in \nMauritius in private sectors.  \nSo, with these words, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I commend, once again, this Bill to the \nHouse. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Seconded? Seconded? Motion needs to be seconded! \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nBill read a second time and committed. \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(Mr Deputy Speaker in the Chair) \nThe Employment Relations (Amendment) Bill (No. XIX of 2024) was considered and \nagreed to. \nOn the Assembly resuming with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair, the Deputy Speaker \nreported accordingly. \nPUBLIC BILLS \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, The Employment Relations (Amendment) Bill (No. XIX \nof 2024) was read a third time and passed. \n\n101 \n \nSecond Reading \nTHE SPECIAL ALLOWANCE BILL (NO. XX OF 2024) \nOrder for Second Reading read. \n(5.30 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations (Mr R. Uteem): Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir, I beg to move that the Special Allowance Bill (No. XX of 2024) be read a \nsecond time. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am pleased to present this historical bill to the House. \nHistorical because no government before has legislated for the provision for a special \nallowance for employees drawing a monthly basic salary not exceeding Rs50,000. I say no \ngovernment before! \nEven last year, in November, when there was a formal request from the Opposition for \nthe payment of a 14th month bonus in December 2023 to all employees of the private and \npublic sectors earning less than Rs50,000, the then Government refused to do so. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the population has been suffering from the disastrous \neconomic policy of the MSM Government with its deliberate policy to depreciate our rupee. \nBetween December 2014 and November 2024, our rupee has depreciated by around 46% \nrelative to the US dollar. This has resulted in a steady increase in the price of goods and \nservices, eroding the purchasing power of our population. The increase in the price of \nessential commodities, foodstuffs, and medicine has particularly affected the working class \nand the pensioners. As a caring Government, we had to do the maximum that we could to \nalleviate the suffering of the population. But, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, before we can give, we \nneed to ascertain how much we have. We have to act responsibly because if we do not have \nthe money, then we will have to borrow, and if we borrow, we must have the ability to repay, \nor else we will be burdening our children and grandchildren. \nThis is why the first thing that the hon. Prime Minister and Minister of Finance did was \nto assess the state of the economy. And last Tuesday, he made a statement to this House with \nregard to the state of the economy, and he tabled a copy of the document. We were all \nstunned, appalled, shocked and angry. We knew that the figures published by the former \nGovernment were unreliable, and we had said so in this House and outside, but we never \n\n102 \n \nexpected the magnitude of the economic mess in which the MSM Government has left us. \nL’ancien ministre des Finances parlait de boom économique, mais c’est plutôt une bombe \néconomique qu’il nous a léguée. \nI will just give you one example, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, and it relates directly to the \nworkers of this country: Contribution Sociale Généralisée. Hon. Members who were here \nwould recall that the then Minister of Finance abolished the contribution which used to be \nmade to the National Pension Fund and instead compelled workers and employers to \ncontribute up to 9% of the salaries of workers to a fund called Contribution Sociale \nGénéralisée. We were told at that time – and I remember very well – the then hon. Minister \nof Finance saying that this contribution to CSG was meant to pay for the pension of workers \nwhen they retire. And he told the House and the population at large that what he was \nproposing was better than the National Pension Fund, which enabled people from the private \nsector at the age of 65 to benefit from an additional pension. \nContribution Sociale Généralisée is nothing more than a tax on the sweat of labour \nwhich is supposed to finance their retirement. However, when we look at the document ‘The \nState of the Economy’ that was tabled last week, for the Financial Year 2024-2025, the State \nis expecting to collect Rs12.9 billion through Contribution Sociale Généralisée. Rs12.9 \nbillion – that is a lot of money taken from the salary of workers of this country. And, Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, do you know out of these Rs12.9 billion, how much the MSM \nGovernment has earmarked to spend from that fund? Out of Rs12.9 billion? They had \nearmarked spending of Rs21.8 billion. Not only have they completely wiped out all the \nContribution Sociale Généralisée which was supposed to pay for the retirement, for the \npension of workers, but now we also have to provide the finance for up to Rs9 billion because \nof the reckless decision of the former Minister of Finance and the former MSM Government, \nunder the former Prime Minister, Pravind Jugnauth. \nIrresponsable ! Irresponsable ! Et comme l’a si bien dit le Deputy Prime Minister, c’est \nun crime économique. Un crime économique envers les Mauriciens, envers les enfants de \nnotre pays. Our public sector debt has reached almost Rs560 billion, representing 83.4% of \nGDP. 83.4% of GDP when, according to law, our public sector debt should not exceed 80% \nof GDP. By comparison, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, when the MSM Government took office in \nDecember 2014, our public sector debt at that time was only Rs237 billion, representing \nslightly less than 60% of GDP. They have more than doubled our debt. The population \n\n103 \n \nneeded the truth, and the Prime Minister took the bold decision of telling the whole \npopulation what the reality of the economic situation in Mauritius is. But now that the truth is \nout, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, what would international rating agencies do? Now that they \nknow that the former Government has been manipulating figures, overstating growth, \nunderstating debt, and understating budget deficits, what would the international rating \ncommunity do? \nAnd, Moody’s was quick to react. Yesterday Moody’s published a communiqué under \nthe heading “Government of Mauritius: Discrepancies in economic data will challenge fiscal \nconsolidation efforts”. While congratulating our Prime Minister, hon. Dr. Navin Ramgoolam \nfor Government’s commitment to transparency and fiscal reforms, Moody’s expressed \nconcerns about the current state of the economy, and Moody’s stated something which is of \ngreat concern to us. Moody’s said, and I quote – \n“The audit’s finding will slow the pace of fiscal consolidation, leaving Mauritius’ debt \nburdened and debt affordability metrics weaker than other Baa3-rated peers.” \nIn encoded terms, Moody’s is warning us. Moody’s is warning us. It is telling us that \nbased on the new data that we have been providing them, our economic situation is worse \nthan other countries which find themselves in the same rating band as ours, Baa3. And as \nexpected, Moody’s ended by telling us that we need to implement reform aimed at debt \nreduction. And I have to add, Moody’s statement came before the Bill was presented to this \nHouse. So, Moody’s is not aware of what we intend to do today in terms of the payment of a \nspecial allowance. \nSo, we are going to face a tough time convincing Moody’s not to downgrade us, Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, and we are already at the last threshold of investment grade. If we are \ndowngraded by Moody’s, we will become junk status, and if we become junk status, it will \nbe very difficult for Mauritius to raise finance on the international market. And even if we are \nable to raise finance on the international market, it would be at a premium, at a higher interest \nrate, and downgrading Mauritius to junk status will have a direct impact on our banks, on our \nbanking system and on the image of Mauritius as a serious financial centre. \nWe should not, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, take the threat of being downgraded lightly. \nJust a few days ago, Moody’s downgraded France’s rating just hours after President Macron \n\n104 \n \nappointed his new Prime Minister, Mr François Bayrou. So, it is against this backdrop, Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, that we are bringing this Bill before the House. \nThe payment of a special allowance that we are proposing through this Bill is part of a \nlarger package which Government is introducing. Through this Bill, we are providing for the \npayment of one month basic salary to 420,200 employees from both the private and public \nsectors, representing some 90% of total employees in this country. So, after the passing of \nthis Bill, 90% of workers in this country would be getting an additional month of basic salary. \nThe second measure that we are introducing as part of the package is to give one month \nallowance to every pensioner, our senior citizens, widows, orphans, and disabled persons. \nThey will also get an additional Rs1,000 from January next year. This alone, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir, will represent a funding of more than Rs5 billion from the State. \nThe third measure that we are proposing is to grant a salary compensation of Rs610 per \nmonth for all workers whose basic salary is less than Rs50,000. We decided to give this \nsalary compensation, which represents the official inflation rate multiplied by the minimum \nwage, despite representations to the contrary by the business community, and in particular, \nBusiness Mauritius. \nThe fourth measure in this package is to reduce the price of petroleum products by Rs5 \nper litre. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this is just the beginning. We will do more as we \nimplement our structural changes, as we install fiscal discipline, as we cut down wastage of \npublic funds and as we boost our economy.  \nWith your permission, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I will now talk about the salient \nfeatures of this Bill. Clause 2 of the Bill defines basic wage or salary and specifies that the \nbasic wage and salary include additional remuneration payable for the year 2024 and the \nwage relativity adjustment payable as from 01 July 2024. This is why it was very important \nthat we pass the first Bill, which we have just done, amending the Employment Relations Act \nto provide for the payment of this additional salary compensation with effect from 01 July \n2024. So, now, the basic salary will also include that adjustment to the basic salary.  \nThe definition of “employee” is in line with the general definition of worker under the \nWorkers’ Rights Act and includes part-time employees. Now, you will note from the \ndefinition in the section that ““employee” does not include a public officer, a local \n\n105 \n \ngovernment officer, or an employee of a statutory body who is, or has opted to be governed \nby the terms and conditions of the Pay Research Bureau.”  \nNow, this provision of the Bill has caused a lot of confusion. I am very disappointed, \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, when I see trade unionists of great experience, having worked in the \ncivil service, who have full knowledge of how things are done in the government sector, \ncome and do a press conference and spread lies about this Government not going to pay the \nspecial allowance to all the public officers of this country. This is not the case!  \nThe Government has taken a commitment and will abide by its commitment to pay a \nbasic one month salary to all public officers in government service, in municipal councils, \nand in parastatal bodies who earn less than Rs50,000, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. The reason \nwhy it is not in the Bill is that this Bill concerns employees of the private sector. \nWith regard to employees in government and those governed by the PRB, when we \nhave to increase the salary compensation or any additional salary, it is done every year by \nway of a circular issued by the Financial Secretary, by the Ministry of Finance, addressed to \nthe Head of Departments, and the Supervising Officers of each Ministries and Departments. \nThose Supervising Officers then in turn inform all the Municipal Councils, the local \nauthorities, the parastatal bodies, and the other public bodies which fall under their \nresponsibility and direct them to effect the payment of compensation. \nThis time also, it is the same methodology that is going to be applied. So, we do not \nneed any amendment to the law to provide for the payment of a special allowance to public \nofficers. Just like we do not need any amendment to the law to pay the pension to the senior \ncitizens, orphans, widows and disabled persons. This has already been taken care of by the \nhon. Minister of Social Security, and I understand that they are going to be paid before the \nyear ends. They have started to be paid as from this week in the post office and in banks. So, \neven before the passing of this Bill, pensioners are being paid their additional one-month \npension.  \nClause 3 of the Bill provides the eligibility criteria for employees to be entitled to the \nspecial allowance. Provision is made for the payment of a special allowance to employees \nwho have been in employment for the whole or part of the year. \n\n106 \n \nSubsection (3) sets out the different circumstances where an employee having worked \nfor part of the year would be entitled to special allowance.  \nSubsection (4) clarifies that where an employee has been in the employment of more \nthan one employer, then each employer will pay his pro rata share of the special allowance.  \nSubsection (5) provides for the payment of special allowance in two instalments. The \nfirst instalment must be paid on or before 31 December of this year, before the year ends. The \nsecond instalment must be paid before the end of January. Now, why two instalments? \nSimply because we have received representations from the workers and trade unionists who \ntold us to make the payment in two instalments because they want to have cash in January to \npay for school materials and school uniforms. That is why we are not paying all the special \nallowance in one go in December. \nProvision is also made in this Bill where the employer and the employee so agree for \nthe payment to be made in up to four equal instalments, but it is strictly where the employer \nand the employee agree. If there is no agreement, then the default rule is still that payment \nhas to be made half before the year ends and half by 31 January. \nSubsection (6) clarifies that the special allowance that is being paid is on top of all \nbonuses that the employee may have been entitled to, whether under collective agreement or \nunder contract with his employer. You know, some people receive a bonus for attendance. \nThis special allowance is on top of that. Even where a private company is able to pay \nmore than 13 months of salary, this special allowance will be payable on top of that bonus \notherwise payable to the employee. \nClause 4 of the Bill empowers an authorised officer to enter any work premises, inspect \nbooks and records, and request the employer to furnish such information as the authorised \nofficer requires for the purpose of complying with the Bill.  \nClause 6 of the Bill makes it an offence for any person to contravene the Bill or \nobstruct an authorised officer in the exercise of his power, punishable by a fine not exceeding \nRs5,000 on conviction, and I need to point out Rs5,000 is per employee. \nI would be moving, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, to amend clause 8 of the Bill at \nCommittee Stage, which will be circulated shortly because we have been working closely \nwith the State Law Office and the Mauritius Revenue Authority. \n\n107 \n \nEssentially, clause 8 of the Bill deals with the criteria for certain enterprises, special \nand medium enterprises and other enterprises that may be prescribed by regulation to get \nfinancial assistance from Government. We do recognise, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that it will \nnot be easy for all enterprises, especially in the Export Processing Sector and the Small \nEnterprises, to absorb the full amount of the special allowance, the payment of the 14th \nmonth’s basic salary that is proposed as special allowance. This is why we have come up \nwith a mechanism whereby those eligible employers will have to pay the salary of the \nemployees, half of it by year-end and the other half in January, and then they can claim the \nmoney back from the Director General of the MRA if they satisfy the criteria set out in the \nBill. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we wish that we could have done more, but our hands were \ntied because of the disastrous state of the economy which we have inherited. I am making a \nsolemn appeal to all enterprises in the private sector who have the means to pay the special \nallowance to also pay that allowance to all workers of their enterprise, including those who \nearn a basic salary exceeding Rs50,000. \nWith these words, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I commend the Bill to the House. \nMr Gunness rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. The Speaker will resume the seat. \nAt this stage, Madam Speaker took the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Please be seated! \nYes, hon. Leader of the Opposition! \n(5.55 p.m.) \nThe Leader of the Opposition (Mr G. Lesjongard): Thank you, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker, toute la république est concernée par le Special Allowance Bill, un \nprojet de loi qui concerne la classe travailleuse mais aussi le patronat, et je suis sûr qu’ils \nnous suivent avec beaucoup d’attention. \n\n108 \n \nMadame la présidente, ce projet de loi découle d’une promesse électorale annoncée \ndans un premier temps par l’Alliance Lepep et par la suite, l’Alliance du Changement. Il y a \nunanimité sur le fait que les travailleurs obtiendront un boni de 14ᵉ mois grâce à l’ancien \nPremier ministre parce que c’est lui qui a annoncé ça en premier, mais malheureusement… \n(Interruptions) \n…ce gouvernement a décidé que seulement une partie des employés vont obtenir ce boni de \n14e mois.  \n(Interruptions) \nPermettez-moi de faire la chronologie des annonces, parce que c’est important pour \ncomprendre là où nous en sommes aujourd’hui. Je l’ai dit : le leader de l’Alliance Lepep, \nPravind Jugnauth, avait fait cette annonce lors d’un rassemblement à Phoenix le 3 novembre \net, par la suite, les dirigeants de l’Alliance du Changement lui ont emboîté le pas lors d’une \nconférence de presse quelques jours plus tard et l’actuel Premier ministre avait confirmé cette \npromesse lors d’une émission sur une radio.  \nPour en revenir à ce que le ministre avait dit un peu plus tôt et à la remarque que j’ai \neue, il faut aussi souligner que c’est en novembre 2023 que le leader de l’opposition d’alors \navait évoqué cette proposition et, à travers une Private Notice Question ce à quoi le ministre \nd’alors avait répondu qu’il faudra faire des consultations avant de prendre une telle décision, \nMadame la présidente. \nUn an après cette PNQ et un mois après les élections générales, soit maintenant, le \ngouvernement vient de l’avant devant cette auguste Assemblée pour l’introduction d’un \npaiement d’un boni de 14ᵉ mois, mais seulement pour les employés touchant un salaire de \nmoins de R 50 000. C’est la première trahison de ce gouvernement envers son électorat et \nenvers la population. Je dirais une première étape de ‘ser sintir’ pour la population. Un \ngouvernement qui montre déjà, malheureusement, qui se soumet au dictat du gros capital… \nAn hon. Member: Ale do ta! \nMr Lesjongard : Au fait, si… \nAn hon. Member: Taler to pou kone ki kantite… \nAn hon. Member: C’est ça! \n\n109 \n \nAn hon. Member: Zot inn fer consta ki zot in fer! \nMr Lesjongard : Si j’évoque cela, Madame la présidente, c’est suite aux déclarations \nde l’honorable Deputy Prime Minister lors d’une conférence de presse samedi, je pense, où il \na évoqué que le gouvernement avait subi de fortes pressions pour fixer le seuil salarial à R 30 \n000. Est-ce que ce gouvernement a cédé aux pressions du patronat pour ne pas payer ceux \ntouchant des salaires de moins que R50 000 ? \nMadame la présidente, une des raisons de ce vote massif lors des dernières élections en \nfaveur de l’Alliance du changement était évidemment la promesse de ce boni de 14ᵉ mois… \nMrs Savabaddy: Li pe rakont zistwar… \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard : Un vote qui comporte… \n(Interruptions) \n…sûrement ceux ayant un salaire plus de… \nAn hon. Member: Met sa deor ! \nMr Lesjongard : R 50 000…. \nMs Babooram: 60-0 la sa! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, he has the floor! \nMrs Savabaddy: Li pe rakont zistwar ! \nMadam Speaker: One moment! He has the floor. Let us respect please. Remember: \nrights, respect, responsibility. Please, you have the floor. \nMr Lesjongard: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Et c’est pourquoi, Madame la \nprésidente, j’ai élaboré la chronologie des événements avant les élections, parce que sans \ncette promesse, je le dis, les résultats auraient pu être autrement. \n(Interruptions) \nWhat was clear, Madame Speaker, to both… \n\n110 \n \n(Interruptions) \nWhat was clear, Madame Speaker, to both the outgoing Government and the incoming one as \nwell as lepep admirable was that the 14-month bonus pledge, far from being a political \ngimmick or a hot air promise, had become a critical vote winner and a necessity in the minds \nof voters to alleviate the cost of living crisis and restore some of their purchasing power \nbefore the end of this year. It was seen, Madam Speaker, by both alliances as vital to restore a \nfeel-good factor among the Mauritian people before the start of the New Year. \nThe outgoing government made it clear that they had the capacity to pay and to honour \nthat pledge. That is where comes the motto – \n“Parole donnée, parole sacrée.” \nSimilarly… \nAn hon. Member: Kokin. \nMr Lesjongard: Similarly, the actual Prime Minister, Dr. Navin Ramgoolam, in a \npress conference on 05 November, as the Leader of Alliance du Changement made the \nfollowing statement, and I quote – \n«  Nou gard nou parol. Seki nou pe dir nou pou fer. L’Alliance du Changement prend \nl’engagement que le paiement du 14e mois sera bel et bien effectué en cas de \nvictoire. » \nNow, Madam Speaker, Government has changed its tune, saying only those earning \nless than Rs50,000 will receive a 14-month bonus. Pour moi, c’est une promesse à demi-\ntenue, Madame la présidente. \nMrs Savabaddy: Rann tou sa kass zot inn kokin avan, lerla nou gete. \nMr Lesjongard: Madam Speaker, I cannot hear such words in this House. May I ask \nthat these words be withdrawn? \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: I do not think we should make remarks on an honourable member. \nBe very careful with comments, please. Be very careful! Please, carry on, hon. Leader of the \nOpposition, but also, do not invite. \nMr Lesjongard: I am not inviting, Madam Speaker. I am stating facts. \n\n111 \n \nMadam Speaker: Well! \nMr Lesjongard: Let them have their way when they take the floor. I will sit down and \nlisten to what they have to say.  \nLe débat que nous tenons aujourd’hui, Madame la présidente, doit prendre en \nconsidération la publication d’un rapport sur l’état de l’économie. Selon la version du \ngouvernement actuel and I will get back to the Report on the State of the Economy later. \nNow, the Government has been saying in their defence, Madam Speaker, that they did \nnot know that the outgoing government had left the country in such an economic mess, \nthereby impairing their ability to honour the 14th month pledge.  \nNow, let me remind the House, Madam Speaker, that as late as June 2024, Mr Rama \nSithanen, the new Governor of the Bank of Mauritius stated the following about the state of \nthe Mauritian economy in an interview he had given in Mauritius Times, and I quote – \n“The economy is already in dire straits if we consider the true figures of GDP, budget \ndeficit, public debt, export of services and foreign exchange reserves and the money \nillusion effect. These key macro indicators are being cynically doctored to hide the \nreality.” \nNow, if it is to be believed, one can only assume, Madam Speaker, that the leaders of \nl’Alliance du Changement were being reckless in making that promise to pay the 14th month \nbonus in full knowledge of their capacity to pay, thus prepared to sacrifice the trust of voters \nat the altar of political expediency, Madam Speaker.  \nIndeed, I know many, if not all, of them on the other side of the House will revel in the \nresounding victory of the alliance during the recent general elections. We have to accept the \ndecision of the population as we have in the past. People voted for a change, and so be it. \nAfter one month, I am much tempted to ask where the change is, but I will come to that much \nlater, Madam Speaker. \nMadame la présidente, la chronologie des événements à la suite des élections générales \ndémontre clairement que le gouvernement préparait l’opinion publique à la révision de leurs \npromesses électorales. La présentation du rapport sur l’état de l’économie va dans ce sens et, \ncomme je l’ai dit un peu plus tôt, le projet de loi qui est présenté à cette Chambre aujourd’hui \nest étroitement lié au State of the Economy Report. \n\n112 \n \nMaintenant, laissez-moi venir sur le projet de loi et permettez-moi de soulever certaines \nsections de ce projet de loi que je qualifierai d’injustes. La première, Madame la présidente, \nc’est le non-paiement aux travailleurs bénéficiant de plus de R 50,000. Sur ce point, la \npopulation, je pense, attend par exemple des explications de l’honorable Subron qui est \nsyndicaliste et qui, je pense, doit venir expliquer, Madame la présidente, le fait de pénaliser \nune catégorie des travailleurs de ce pays. Le gouvernement débute son règne en créant une \nfrustration parmi son électorat mais aussi parmi la population, Madame la présidente. \nLet me get to Clause 3, subsection 5(a) of the Bill where it is stipulated that – \n“every employer shall pay the Special Allowance in 2 equal instalments where –  \n(i) \nthe first instalment is paid not later than on the last working day of December \n2024; and  \n(ii) \nthe last instalment is paid on the last working day of January 2025.” \nMadam Speaker, it is all too clear that the above proposed provision is a mandatory \nsection imposing a positive duty on every employer to pay the Special Allowance in two \nequal instalments. It is our firm contention that the employer should instead have had an \nobligation imposed on him to pay the Special Allowance in one full and final instalment in \nDecember and that, well before the last working day, so as not to defeat its purpose. \nFurthermore, Madam Speaker, clause 3 (5) (a) leaves no doubt that it is to be read \nsubject to clause 3 (5) (b). Now, if I may, it is both my firm and reasoned opinion that (5) (b) \nis loosely drafted and this may possibly create some practical difficulties or confusions and, \nmore importantly, Madam Speaker, open floodgates for potential abuse by unscrupulous \nemployers. I say so for the following reasons, and I will explain. \nFirst, by allowing an employer and employee to agree on the payment of a special \nallowance in not more than four equal instalments on the condition that such a payment starts \non the last working day of December 2024 and the remaining instalments are paid on such \ndates as they may agree. \nMadam Speaker, therefore, on a literal interpretation of this first part of the clause, an \nemployer and an employee may agree to straddle the payment across four equal instalments, \nand there is no mention of a specific timeframe within which the four instalments should be \npaid. \n\n113 \n \nI am of the view, Madam Speaker, that there are not sufficient safeguards in the present \nBill to ensure that any agreement reached under this section is through a transparent and \ndocumented process and done in a fair and honest manner to effectively rule out any real \npossibility of undue influence, intimidation, threats or any form of coercion in the mind of the \nworker to secure such an agreement. This is why I believe that in its current form, this section \ndoes not provide adequate guarantees to the working class and is dangerous in the hands of \nsome inconsiderate employers. \nNow, these two distinct rules will also create two categories of workers – \ni. \none who gets paid in two instalments and by not later than the end of January \n2025, and \nii. \nothers who, because of an agreement which has been reached, payment will be \nmade in four equal instalments without a specific timeframe. \nAs highlighted in situations where there will be no proper supervision or adequate control by \nthe State.  \nThe hon. Minister mentioned that and I also wish to add that there is no offence \nspecified under clause 6 in relation to acts and doings or omissions on the part of an employer \nwho may fraudulently, intentionally, negligently, recklessly or carelessly mislead the \nemployee into an agreement under clause 3 (5) (b). Therefore, justifying the apprehension \nwhich an employee may have. Anyway, at any rate, the penalty imposed “should a person be \nfound to have committed an offence under the Act shall on conviction be liable to a fine not \nexceeding only Rs5,000,” which is, relatively, Madam Speaker, a weak penalty and unlikely \nto have a meaningful punitive effect to force compliance.  \nNow, the last part of clause 3 (5) (b) is to the effect that where there is no agreement, \npayment will be effected at the end of each successive month following the month of \nDecember. Madam Speaker, this part is the most vague and imprecise. One is left wondering \nwhether there is any legal need to have this part. For if there is no agreement, then it means \ntechnically that the provision of clause 3 (5) (a) should prevail. Clause 3 (5) (a) which \nspecifies the time period to pay in two instalments not later than the last working day of \nJanuary, cannot be made subject to this link to clause 3 (5) (b) where there is no agreement \nand no clarity as to by when the payment should be completed. \n\n114 \n \nHaving this in the second part of the Bill, Madam Speaker, cannot be reconciled with \nclause 3 (5) (a) which becomes of no purpose. In light of the foregoing arguments, I propose \nthat this be removed completely to avoid any confusion, that is, where no agreement is \nreached, as it is not in order, Madam Speaker. \nNow, let me comment on the report of the State of the Economy, which has been \nwidely commented upon since it has been tabled at this House. But before, I would like to \nrefer the House to the IMF Report where it is stated, and I quote – \n“The 2024 Article IV Consultation discusses that Mauritius has rebounded strongly \nfrom the pandemic on the back of buoyant tourism, social housing construction and \nfinancial services. The outlook for growth remains favourable. Headline inflation is \nprojected to ease further and public debt is projected to continue moderating over the \nmedium term.” \nAnother report, Madam Speaker, the second one from the OECD, which dates back to 04 \nDecember, only two weeks ago, and I quote – \n“Mauritius’ economy continues to grow strongly, supported by strong momentum in \ntourism and investment. Tourist arrivals in 2024 are on track to surpass the record set in \n2018 (…).” \nCela m’emmène à poser des questions, Madame la présidente, et je pense que pas mal \nde gens se posent les mêmes questions. Qui sont ceux qui ont travaillé sur les chiffres \navancés dans le rapport sur l’état de l’économie ? Est-ce que ce sont les mêmes personnes qui \nont préparé les différents rapports sous l’ancien gouvernement ? \nDo we know who wrote it? How was it done, and which methodology was used? In \nfact, Madam Speaker, I believe that the figures were revised just to show negativity and scare \nthe population. They say that it is Statistics Mauritius who has revised these figures. The \nsame Statistics Mauritius, which, quarter after quarter, and the latest one being in September, \nhad predicted a growth of 6.5% for this year and confirmed the growth rate of 7% for last \nyear! \nAn hon. Member: Manipulé ! \n\n115 \n \nMr Lesjongard: Are you now telling us that the same team at Statistics Mauritius has \nsuddenly decided that the previous regime had manipulated figures and they now have \ndecided to revise the GDP figures downwards? \n(Interruptions) \nAre you telling us that? Are you telling the population that? \n(Interruptions) \nThis is a joke, Madam Speaker! One which we will pay dearly on the international seal! \nMadam Speaker, I ask that question again: who has done the state of the economy \nreport? \nWe have to know! This is why I am putting that question. Was it baited by those around \nthe hon. Prime Minister? Those who believe that scaring the population and removing all \nsocial gains will make the hon. Prime Minister popular? \nJe pense qu’il y a des questions légitimes que tout le monde et la population sont en \ndroit de se poser. Un mois après les élections, ce gouvernement a brossé un tableau noir de \nl’économie de notre pays.  \n(Interruptions) \nThe hon. Prime Minister has been talking about ‘Voodoo Economics.’ But he should \nremember the days when, in this country, we were talking about the infamous ‘trou Bheenick’ \nand some years later, l’imposition des taxes sur la classe moyenne de ce pays. Today, the \nVoodoo experts have strapped again, Madam Speaker. \nThe Voodoo experts have this time deliberately downsized the contribution – and that is \ntrue – of GBCS to our economy. The figures have been almost halved; from Rs84.5 billion, it \nhas been reduced to Rs40 billion. That is my question: why this treatment to GBCS \ncompanies, Madam Speaker? That has resulted in the estimated GDP growth for 2023 and \n2024 being reduced, respectively, from 7% to 5.6% and from 6.5% to 5.1%. Similarly, public \nsector debt figures have been revised upwards. This might have pleased certain egos, Madam \nSpeaker. But the damage of the Voodoo document cooked avec de mauvaises intentions will \nhave far-reaching implications, Madam Speaker. \n\n116 \n \nNow, let me get back to the threshold that has been put forward in the payment of the \n14th-month bonus. I believe it is not fair on the part of the Minister to state that the payment \nof the 14th month bonus necessitates further borrowing by Government and that it will put \nMauritius at the risk of being downgraded. As I said earlier, the revised figures by this \nGovernment of the economic and public finance fundamentals have already placed Mauritius \non the downgrade trail when I refer to the report mentioned by the hon. Minister in his \nspeech. We are going in that direction. \nTherefore, do not try to put the blame on the most deserved 14th month bonus for the \nworkers of this country! Let me say it more particularly: had the MSM been in power, we \nwould have paid the 14th month bonus as promised and at one go! \n(Interruptions) \nWe would not have invented excuses as this Government is doing! \nAn hon. Member: Dollar ti pou vinn 60 roupi ! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard: Madam Speaker, we, as a country, have successfully rebounded from \nthe COVID pandemic and managed an economic crisis initiated by the war in Ukraine. Nous \nne sommes plus auprès de la vague, Madame la présidente. The tourism sector is thriving, \nand foreign investments have reached record numbers. Our country – and this is a fact – has \nwitnessed unprecedented infrastructural transformation. So much so that we will witness the \nimpact of existing but also of new projects that have been initiated during the past two years \nover the next coming two years! \nMadam Speaker, I understand the political game! \n(Interruptions) \nDo not make the mistake of suggesting that nothing has been done during the past ten \nyears. The country has taken a giant leap over the past decade. \n(Interruptions) \n\n117 \n \nIt is the same civil servants currently working in your ministries who have made this \npossible! It is thanks to their constant effort, courage and resilience that we have managed to \ndeliver what we have delivered.  \n(Interruptions) \nYou want to bring disrepute to the previous regime? Fair enough, hon. Mr Bhagwan!  \n(Interruptions) \nBut be careful not to offend the very talented and dedicated individuals who have given \nus, for example, the SAJ Bridge, the Victoria Urban Terminal, the Metro Express, the sports \ncomplexes and thousands of social housing units! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Come back to the Bill, please!  \nMr Lesjongard: Yes, I will get back to the Bill, Madam Speaker. \n(Interruptions) \n Le gouvernement doit respecter ses engagements pris auprès de ce peuple ! And I am \nnot talking only about the 14th month, Madam Speaker.  \nNow, as Leader of the Opposition, I have the responsibility to raise question in this \nHouse. \nMadam Speaker: Of course! \nMr Lesjongard: I will do so, Madam Speaker. Autant de questions qu’il en faut parce \nque la population, Madame la présidente, veut avoir des réponses. \n(Interruptions) \n It is indeed, Madam Speaker, my first intervention in this House as Leader of the \nOpposition. I am being very fair. I understand that it is a new government with many \nnewcomers, but also seasoned politicians sitting on the other side of the House and running a \nministry for the first time. \n\n118 \n \nLike I said, il y aura une période de grâce et je vais respecter cela, Madame la \nprésidente. But comes the next parliamentary session next year, this will not be the case!  \n(Interruptions) \nJe vais conclure, Madame la présidente. \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Pe gagn per ! Pe tremble la ! \n(Interruptions) \n Madam Speaker: Order! Order! \nMr Lesjongard: Madame la présidente, je vais terminer. Nous avons un nouveau \ngouvernement qui, à travers son manifeste électoral, a présenté ses intentions. Mais il y aura \nsurement un programme gouvernemental. Certes, ce qui est vrai, c’est que vous avez gagné \navec une large majorité… \n(Interruptions) \n …qui vous permet d’apporter des changements aux niveaux constitutionnels et \ninstitutionnels. J’espère qu’il n’y aura pas d’abus !  \n(Interruptions) \nMalheureusement, les premiers pas de ce gouvernement sont inquiétants pour la \npopulation – une promesse que j’ai qualifiée un peu plus tôt de demi-teinte. Le peuple ne \nmérite pas une politique économique d’austérité, comme cela avait été le cas entre 2005 et \n2010 !  \nJ’en ai terminé, Madame la présidente. \nAn hon. Member: Enfin! Enfin! \n(Interruptions) \n       Madam Speaker: Merci. Yes, hon. DPM!  \n(6.30 p.m.) \n\n119 \n \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, usually, the Member who speaks after \nthe Leader of the Opposition spends the first part of his or her speech replying to the Leader \nof the Opposition. There is nothing to reply to! \nI have listened to the Leader of the Opposition. We respect him. We were all present \nwhen he put his PNQ, when he made his speech – if we can call that a speech – but we were \nall present. There is nothing to reply to. There are two of them, and the Leader of the \nOpposition speaks on such an important bill, and the second one is not even present. Do I \nneed to speak? \n(Interruptions) \nIn itself, this speaks for everything… \nAn hon. Member: Li fatigue, happy hour! \n (Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Good one! Good one! And I will take just one example. \nHe stands up and says, ‘nou pe soutir bann employeurs’. If an employer does not respect the \nlaw, Rs5,000 only. He is not even aware that it is Rs5,000 for every worker. It is Rs5,000 for \nevery time that the law is not abided by! Even that, he has not managed to understand, \nMadam Speaker. So, I will not waste more time. With due respect to the Leader of the \nOpposition without any …There are two of them, and already one has vanished? \n(Interruptions) \nEnfin, let me get to more serious things. It is true that we have to talk about the \npackage. The Bill is about le 14ème mois, but we are all aware that we have to talk about the \npackage – le 14ème mois, compensation salariale, les salariés, la baisse du prix de l’essence \net du diesel. We have to do that because we have had a look at what they left behind, and we \nhave taken the best decision that we could take to preserve the future of this country. \nTherefore, let us rapidly look at this package, Madam Speaker. \nI will not come back to what was said last week, recently in the State of the Economy. \nIt speaks for itself, but what we are discovering is worse than what is in the State of the \nEconomy. I will take just one example, and there will be dozens of examples like this. Le \nMetro Express, leur grande fierté. Allow me, Madam Speaker, to illustrate that what we are \nfinding out is worse than what is in the State of the Economy. Metro Express, as at date, they \nhave Rs17 billion de dettes. R 17 milliards, ils ont perdu en cinq ans, en termes de foreign \n\n120 \n \nexchange loss, trois milliards de roupies. We all know that what you spend in a business, in \nan operation, you must earn. \nMadam Speaker, the operating expenses – catastrophe! The annual deficit is about \nRs300 million. Operating expenses: R 300 million de pertes chaque année! Et ce n’est pas \nfini. We all know that trams, they do not last forever. In the near future, we will have to start \nreplacing. It has been calculated that major overall costs for the light rail vehicles are to be \nincurred in financial years 2026-2027 and so on. With the inclusion of the overall and final \ncost, Metro Express would face an average deficit of some Rs2 billion yearly for the next 10 \nyears. That is just one example. For Metro Express to break even, it would require its fares to \nbe increased up to R 213 as compared to the current maximum fare of R 55. These are real \nfacts and figures. What we are discovering c’est pire que ce qui est dans le State of the \nEconomy. \nIt is all over the place like that. You talk about the CEB? Name it! State Trading \nCorporation, name it! Air Mauritius, worse than everything! Worse! Even worse than Metro, \nthe billions and billions which they took from the Bank of Mauritius through MIC, R 24 \nmilliards if I am not mistaken – R 24 milliards dilapidated! So, I do not want to spend too \nmuch time, but it is all over the place, the mess. Que le peuple comprenne bien, we have done \nthe maximum, and according to the IMF, the World Bank, and the private sector, we should \nnot have given what is in this Bill, in the package. \nJe demande à la population, aux salariés, aux travailleurs, aux cadres de bien \ncomprendre. Nous avons fait le maximum. Maintenant, quand on regarde les rapports, etc., il \nest clair que Moody’s se préparait à nous downgrade. Et la menace est là ! Je n’ai pas besoin \nde rappeler à la population que Moody’s nous avait downgraded le 28 juillet 2022. Cela nous \npend au nez économiquement. Un downgrading ! Bon, on a fait le maximum. Mon collègue, \nle ministre du Travail, faisait référence à un communiqué de Moody’s datant de quelques \nheures à peine. Tout récent. Allons bien réaliser que c’était flatteur pour le gouvernement, \noui. Mais c'est parce qu’on a dit notre intention d’aller dans une direction. On n’a pas le \nchoix, il faut réduire la dette. Il faut redresser le budget. On n’a pas le choix. Donc, le \nPremier ministre est venu avec des chiffres. We mean to do what we said. \nMais ce communiqué de Moody’s est venu juste avant qu’on ne vienne avec ce \npackage. Juste avant ! Ils sont sûrement en train de refaire tous les calculs, etc. Ils doivent \ncroire qu’on les a couillonnés. On ne les a pas couillonnés, comme on le dit en créole. Non ! \nOn a considéré que c’était le minimum, qui est en même temps le maximum que nous \n\n121 \n \npouvions faire. Mais seulement, il y a des mesures qui ont été annoncées dans le State of the \nEconomy, que nous avons répétées quand nous avons offert ce package. \nIl faut redresser l’économie, et il n’y a pas mille façons de faire cela. S’attaquer à la \ndette publique, s’attaquer au déficit budgétaire, mais il n’y a même plus de déficit budgétaire. \nIl y a un désordre budgétaire total ! En vérité, il n’y a plus de budget. Il y a des fonds \nspéciaux partout, il y a une banque centrale qui n’était plus une banque centrale, qui était \ndevenue une planche à billets. Nous n’avons pas le choix, et franchement, quand on regarde \ncette menace de downgrading, mais même si Moody’s nous dégrade, il faut regarder au-delà, \nparce que le mess qu’ils ont laissé derrière eux, cela ne va pas prendre un mois pour redresser \ncela. Cela demande un an, deux ans, trois ans, quatre ans, cinq ans ! We mean it and we will \ndo it, Madam Speaker. It is going to be difficult. Il y a des mesures qu’il nous faudra prendre \ntrès vite. Par exemple, le Mauritius Investment Corporation (MIC), vraiment, je ne parle pas à \nla légère. \nLe Premier ministre d’avant – son père n’aurait jamais commis des crimes comme ça ! \nJ’ai connu son père pendant des années et on n’était pas d’accord sur beaucoup de choses, \nmais les crimes que Pravind Jugnauth et son complice Dr. Padayachy ont commis, son père \nn’aurait jamais commis de tels crimes ! Voilà la situation dans laquelle on est. \nOn aura des décisions difficiles à prendre. Mais à quoi pensons-nous ? À l’avenir, aux \nenfants de ce pays, aux petits-enfants. Aret badine avek tou enn pei ! We mean what we say, \nand we are going do it! Mais nous allons continuer, comme l’a dit mon ami Ashok Subron, le \nPremier ministre et les autres, nous allons continuer de faire le maximum que nous pouvons. \nC’est pourquoi on a été obligé de limiter le paiement du quatorzième mois aux salariés qui \ntouchent moins que R 50 000. Il n’y a pas d’argent ; ils ont défoncé la caisse. Ils n’ont pas \ndéfoncé la caisse ; ils ont volé la caisse et sont partis avec ! Enfin, il y a des moments \ndifficiles devant nous. \nEt je vois, probablement genuinely wrong, venir dire que les fonctionnaires n’auront \npas de quatorzième mois. Mon collègue l’a bien expliqué. Je préfère croire que c’est de \nl’ignorance. Je ne suis pas sûr, mais allons faire semblant de croire que c’est de l’ignorance \nqui fait dire une chose pareille. C’est terrible ! \nCertaines mesures, ce n’est pas nous qui avons à les prendre s’il faut les prendre, \ncomme une augmentation des interest rates, les taux d’intérêts de la Banque centrale. On a \n\n122 \n \nrendu son indépendance à la Banque centrale. On a mis quelqu’un et on peut ne pas être \nd’accord avec lui, mais personne ne met en question la compétence professionnelle. Nous \nlaissons la nouvelle Banque de Maurice prendre les décisions qu’il faut en ce qui concerne les \ntaux d’intérêts.  \nNous allons nous concentrer sur deux choses surtout, comme je le répète, diminuer la \ndette publique – une pression terrible – et redresser le budget de l’État. Ils ont tout ruiné ! Ces \ndécisions-là, nous allons les prendre, mais tout en continuant à faire le maximum. C’est \npourquoi, en ce qui concerne les pensionnés, les handicapés, les allowances – il y a des \ncarer’s allowances, tout cela–, ils auront tout ce qu’on a promis parce qu’on peut tenir cette \npromesse-là. Mais on ne va pas tenir une promesse au prix de l’avenir de ce pays. \nHeureusement, je le dis franchement, qu’on a le Premier ministre que nous avons et \nqu’on est en parfait accord sur ce qu’on peut faire et sur ce qu’on ne peut pas faire. Et il faut \nregarder l’horizon, non pas seulement notre poche, mais regarder l’horizon. Nous allons le \nfaire et nous allons réussir. Ce ne sera pas facile, mais nous allons réussir. \nJ’allais oublier de le dire : nous avions pris la décision de donner l’exemple. We had \ndecided before the law came de donner l’exemple : les députés, les ministres qui étaient dans \nce Parlement l’année dernière ne prendraient pas le quatorzième mois. Maintenant, la loi a \nlimité à R 50 000. Mais avant cela, nous avions pris la décision de donner l’exemple qu’un \ndéputé et un ministre ne prendraient pas le quatorzième mois si le quatorzième mois était à \nleur portée, à leur disposition. Parce que nous avons la ferme intention de donner l’exemple \naussi, partout où nous pourrons donner l’exemple. \nLa situation est tellement grave que j’ai dit que nous aurons à compter sur nos alliés, \nnos amis, les pays alliés, les pays amis, les pays étrangers. Nous aurons à compter sur eux.  À \ncommencer par l’Inde, la Grande-Bretagne et les États-Unis et la Chine, n’en déplaise à \ncertains, tous les pays amis. Nous comptons sur eux, mais seulement we must earn what we \nwill get from them. They look at the horizon their way, but they look at the horizon also. Et \nnous allons voir que faire vis-à-vis de la Banque mondiale et du FMI. Je dis toujours à mes \namis ces derniers temps : prenez le temps d’étudier ce qui s’est passé et ce qui se passe au Sri \nLanka et aux îles Maldives. A lot of lessons to be learned by them, Madam Speaker. Et que le \ngouvernement d’avant ne vienne pas dire : « Ah, ils se tournent vers la Banque… » Je vous \n\n123 \n \nrappelle que le gouvernement précédent avait conclu ou plutôt cherché un accord avec la \nBanque mondiale. \nDans le budget 2023-2024, était prévu 250 millions de la Banque mondiale. Mais ça \naussi, ils n’ont pas été foutus de faire ! Ils n’ont même pas réussi à négocier ce qu’ils avaient \nannoncé dans le budget. 250 millions disparus ! Nous aurons à faire des efforts et nous \ncomptons sur la Banque mondiale, le FMI. Pas à n’importe quelle condition. \nC’est un peu la même chose que dans le cas de Diego Garcia et des Chagos. La Grande-\nBretagne a finalement été obligée de reconnaitre notre souveraineté. Une souveraineté que \nnous avons depuis 1965/1968, et ils ont offert un enn ti kas, Enfin, impe enn ‘gro ti kas’ ! Enn \nti kas ! Quoi ? Parce qu’on est en difficulté, on va sauter dessus ! Maintenant qu’ils ont \nreconnu notre souveraineté, nous trouverons d’autres moyens si les négociations \nn’aboutissent pas, parce que les négociations sont toujours en cours. Et nous avons besoin de \ncet argent pour sortir de l’economic mess dans lequel le gouvernement précédent nous a mis, \nmais pas à n’importe quel prix, pas à n’importe quelle condition. \nNous sommes lucides, Madame la présidente. Nous sommes parfaitement lucides et \nnous ferons notre devoir, ariv ki ariv. Je terminerai en revenant sur quelque chose que nous \navons à adopter, que nous avons mis dans notre programme, un Fiscal Responsibility Act. \nQu’est-ce que c’est qu’un Fiscal Responsibility Act ? C’est une loi qui fixe les taux \nendettement du pays, le déficit budgétaire, etc., qui exige une responsabilité du \ngouvernement. \nDes Fiscal Responsibility Acts existent de par le monde. Seulement, le plus souvent, les \npays où existe un Fiscal Responsibility Act ne respectent même pas leur propre loi. Pas tous \nles pays, mais beaucoup de pays. C’est pourquoi certains pays comme la Jamaïque – mes \ncollègues ont étudié ce qui se passe en Jamaïque – pas seulement aujourd’hui, depuis quatre \nans, it is cooking en Jamaïque. Et la Jamaïque est parmi les premiers pays qui a un Fiscal \nResponsibility Act, mais qui veut aussi un mécanisme pour faire respecter ce Fiscal \nResponsibility Act. C’est pourquoi ils ont voté et ils sont en train de mettre debout un \nIndependent – et vraiment indépendant, pas comme l’ancienne ICAC d’ici, heureusement – \nFiscal Commission, des gens indépendants, qualifiés, avec un board, avec un directeur \ngénéral, avec un Advisory Board pour faire respecter le Fiscal Responsibility Act que notre \npays a adopté. \n\n124 \n \nNous sommes sérieux, nous regardons loin, nous regardons l’horizon. Le Premier \nministre et moi, et les autres, nous ne voulons pas que ce crime économique qui a été commis \nces cinq dernières années se répète. Il faut à tout prix éviter cela, et le prix, c’est un bon \nFiscal Responsibility Act et un bon mécanisme pour le faire respecter, un Independent Fiscal \nCommission. Un mois dans l’histoire d’un pays, c’est peu, mais nous sommes fiers de ce que \nnous sommes en train de faire depuis un mois et je demande aux travailleurs, je demande aux \nsyndicats, je demande aux cadres professionnels de bien comprendre de quelle situation de \nfaillite nous avons hérité et que nous ne pouvons pas faire plus que ce que nous avons fait \navec ce package. Non, franchement, j’ai été syndicaliste, je suis politicien depuis 40 ans. \nAlors, si on pouvait, et tout le monde sait que je suis quelqu’un de responsable avant tout, \nquand je donne une parole, je tiens ma parole, à moins que ce soit impossible de tenir la \nparole. \nC’est le cas-là, nous avons dit que nous allions donner un 14ᵉ mois, nous avons donné, \nmais pas le full 14ᵉ mois que nous aurions aimé donner. Mais je demande à la population, aux \ncadres, aux salariés de bien comprendre : nous avons fait et nous continuerons à faire le \nmaximum pour les plus vulnérables, pour les pensionnés, les vieux, pour les salariés au bas \nde l’échelle, pour les victimes de la misère en général et pour les autres aussi, dans toute la \nmesure du possible, les professionnels, les cadres. Mais notre phare à nous, et je terminerai \nlà-dessus, notre phare à nous, c’est l’avenir de notre pays. Ni le Premier ministre ni moi ne \nferons rien qui, comme eux ils ont fait, tuera l’avenir de ce pays. Depuis un mois, nous \ntravaillons nuit et jour à cela. Peut-être que la population ne se rend pas compte, ce mois qui \nvient de passer, de la pression qu’il y a eue sur le Premier ministre, sur moi-même, de la \npression du travail quand on a d’autres dossiers comme ce dossier-ci et le dossier Chagos-\nDiego, ben, cela ne nous a pas empêchés de nous occuper des autres problèmes. Je prends un \nexemple : j’ai passé je ne sais pas combien d’heures à discuter avec les gens concernés, à \ncommencer par Sam Lauthan, de la drogue, des ravages qu’elle fait, il faut travailler là-dessus \naussi. \nDonc, depuis un mois, nous travaillons non seulement à sauver et à redresser cette \néconomie, à faire face aux Britanniques sur le dossier Chagos et Tromelin, mais déjà chaque \nministre est à son poste, et je salue les nouveaux ministres – je salue en particulier mon \ncamarade Ashok – et la façon qu’ils ont appris ce rôle de ministre avec responsabilité et avec \ncourage aussi. Depuis un mois, nous travaillons d’arrache-pied ; nous allons continuer. Je \n\n125 \n \ndemande à la population de bien comprendre que nous ne pouvions pas, nous ne pouvons pas \nfaire plus que ce que nous avons fait. Allons construire l’avenir ensemble. \nMerci, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker : Hon. Parapen ! \n(6.55 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \n(Mr K. Parapen): Madam Speaker, it is with great humility and a deep sense of \nresponsibility that I address this esteemed Assembly for the first time. Today marks my \nmaiden speech as a Member of Parliament, and I am honoured to have the privilege of \nrepresenting the people of Constituency No. 1, Grand River North West and Port Louis West \nin this august Assembly. \nI rise today to speak on the second reading of the Special Allowance Bill. While the \nGeneral Elections held on 10 November 2024 may be behind us, the commitments taken \nduring the electoral campaign are still very much alive. It is worth remembering that the \npromise of the payment of a 14th month did not feature in the electoral manifesto of the \nAlliance du Changement, when it was presented to the public on Tuesday, 29 October 2024. \nAs a matter of fact, Madam Speaker, the promise of a 14th month bonus did not feature \nin the electoral manifesto of any of the prominent political parties or alliances which took \npart in these elections. So, must we not ask ourselves, how did this measure of the 14th-\nmonth bonus make its way into Parliament? The hon. Leader of the Opposition, in his speech, \nalluded to the announcement of the 14th month bonus by the then l’Alliance Lepep as being a \ndecision taken to address the loss of purchasing power of the population. The hon. Leader of \nthe Opposition has either lost his memory, or he is deliberately misleading the House. \nMadam Speaker, desperate people do desperate things, and in the face of a crushing \nelectoral defeat, the then Prime Minister Jugnauth notoriously announced the payment of the \n14th month bonus if he was re-elected during the last political rally of his party on 03 \nDecember 2024, exactly a week before the elections were due to take place. At no point in \ntime did he or any of the representatives from his Alliance Lepep explain the rationale behind \nthe payment of the 14th month or the way such an onerous electoral promise would be \nfinanced. As we said, Madam Speaker, desperate people do desperate things. \n\n126 \n \nMadam Speaker, it is well known that in order to neutralise the political opponent, one \nof the most effective strategies is to mirror the action of your opponent. In the United States, \nafter losing several presidential elections in a row, the Democratic Party under Bill Clinton \nadopted some traditionally Republican positions, like advocating for welfare reform and a \nbalanced budget. This strategy turned out to be effective and helped Bill Clinton secure two \nconsecutive terms as the President of the United States of America. Tony Blair adopted a \nsimilar approach a few years later in the United Kingdom by launching his new Labour \nMovement to woo Tories’ voters. This helped Blair secure three consecutive electoral \nsuccesses. \nMadam Speaker, in our local context, unfortunately, populism is now deeply ingrained \nwithin our political tradition. The politics of met for gagne for has been on the ascendency for \nmany years now, and no political party has epitomised this more than the previous \ngovernment led by the Mouvement Socialiste Militant of Pravind Jugnauth. The last-ditch \nattempt to salvage his sinking government by promising a 14th-month salary will go down in \nhistory as the pinnacle of populism in Mauritian politics. \nMadam Speaker, the sheer structure of our society means that populist measures can \nhave a significant impact on voting patterns, and truth be told, numerous elections in the not-\nso-distant past have been won or lost on the basis of populist measures being announced or \nnot announced. \nHowever unfortunate, this is the reality of the situation, and we cannot and should not \nhide away from it. Madam Speaker, neutralising a political opponent which indulges in \npopulism in the Republic of Mauritius is no mean feat. Past experience has taught us that the \nonly effective strategy is to mirror its policies, however irresponsible they might be. Madam \nSpeaker, one could argue that it was not necessary for the Alliance du Changement to include \na 14th-month bonus in its electoral manifesto, that the alliance would have won a landslide \nvictory, irrespective of this one-off 14th-month salary payment, and they would probably be \nright, Madam Speaker, but the question I would like to put to all those who share this premise \nis very simple – aren’t we all wise after the event? \nMadam Speaker, my party – Rezistans ek Alternative – agreed to join forces with the \nLabour Party, the Mouvement Millitant Mauricien and the Nouveaux Démocrates on \nprogrammatic and pragmatic grounds because, in our opinion, our beloved country was on \nthe brink of entering a fully-fledged dictatorship. At the last general elections, we were \n\n127 \n \nadamant that we could not take any chances with respect to the outcome of the elections. \nPravind Jugnauth and his government had to be ousted. \nMadam Speaker, the decision of the Alliance du Changement to align itself with \nJugnauth’s trump card of a 14th month salary should also be interpreted in the same vein, that \nis, to do what we must do to ensure that our country is liberated from the grasp of a regime \nthat has been responsible for so much suffering and anguish among the population. So, it is in \nthis context that the Special Allowance Bill, which is being debated in this House today, must \nbe taken. It is a profound desire of this Government to honour the commitments announced \nduring the electoral campaign, and I have no doubt that this Government would have \nhonoured its commitment to pay a full 14th month salary bonus to all employees had the \nfinancial situation of the economy been healthy, but one cannot make abstraction of a dire \neconomic predicament the country finds itself in. \nIn his State of the Economy address on Tuesday, 10 December 2024, the hon. Prime \nMinister and Minister of Finance painted a very gloomy picture of our economy. As an \neconomist and the economic spokesperson for Rezistans ek Alternativ over the last ten years \nor so now, I was more than convinced that the previous government was cooking the books \nand hiding the real true economic situation from the population, but I must confess that I was \nappalled by what was revealed in this very House about the state of the Mauritian economy. \nThe term ‘politique de terre brûlée’ is very much appropriate in light of the destructive \npolicies implemented by the former government. In light of the report on the State of the \nEconomy, it would have been hugely inappropriate for this Government to proceed with a \nblanket 14th month bonus. Not only would it have severely impacted our level of public \nindebtedness, but it would have sent the wrong signal to the outside world. \nA country’s sovereign rating can be likened to an individual’s reputation. Once one \ngains a bad reputation, it can take years or even decades to make up for it. Rating agencies \nlike Moody’s rank countries across the world and typically distinguish them between two \ncategories: investment grade and non-investment grade. As stated by the Minister of Labour, \nhon. Mr Uteem, those countries with a non-investment grade status are also known as junk-\nrated countries, and they typically face harsher financing conditions. \nMauritius managed to attain an investment-grade status over the years owing to its \ncumulative economic progress and manageable public debt levels. However, after 10 years \nunder the stewardship of Pravind Jugnauth, the country is on the brink of losing its \n\n128 \n \ninvestment-grade status and being moved into the junk category. The threat is very much real. \nSuch a downgrade would spell trouble for our economy, especially for some important \nsegments of our financial sector. \nMadam Speaker, the decision not to award a 14th-month bonus to those earning more \nthan Rs50,000 per month has nothing to do with supposed pressures from employers, as \nalluded to by the hon. Leader of the Opposition. If the previous government had not \nransacked the coffers of Government, a blanket 14th-month bonus would have been paid to \nall. As a responsible Government, we must do everything we can to convince international \nrating agencies that we are still worth an investment-grade rating. This will not be an easy \ntask, but it starts with the Special Allowance Bill today. \nWith respect to devising the right criteria upon which someone would be eligible and \nsomeone would not be eligible, there can never be a perfect formula. Each formula will come \nwith pros and cons. The eligibility criteria decided by this Government have been a means-\ntested one. As such, 90% of the working population earning the lowest basic salaries will be \neligible for a 14th-month bonus. Yes, Madam Speaker, 9 out of 10 Mauritians who are \nrecognised as employees under the laws of the Republic will be receiving a 14th-month \nsalary, and this is a highly commendable effort by the Government, given the difficult \nfinancial condition the country finds itself in. \nThat said, I feel it is also important to take note that inflation has been so rampant in \nrecent years in Mauritius that there has been a generalised impoverishment of all households \nacross all social classes. As such, several citizens who find themselves in the bracket of \nsalaries not eligible for the special allowance feel that they have been unjustly excluded and \nthat they too deserve some sort of gratification. The Government should not turn a deaf ear to \nthese individuals and should give due consideration to their grievances when crafting future \neconomic policies. \nThe middle class is the backbone of any thriving economy, and it is a fact that the \nmiddle class of our society has suffered the most over the last ten years compared to other \nsocial strata. Madam Speaker, it is also worth mentioning the one-off nature of this special \nallowance given to eligible employees. In no way should this Bill be considered as an integral \npart of the economic policy framework of this new Government. Its non-recurrence means \nthat its impact on the economy and society will be short-lived. All stakeholders must take \n\n129 \n \ngood note of this, including the beneficiaries themselves, the non-beneficiaries, as well as the \nprivate sector. \nIt is also highly appreciable that the special allowance has been broken into two \ntranches, one payable in December 2024 and another one in January 2025. This will allow the \nmass of money to flow into different sectors of the economy and provide a broad-based \neconomic impetus. The self-employed community, though not a direct beneficiary of a 14th-\nmonth bonus, stands to gain indirectly from this measure as their business activities will \nlikely flourish on account of increased consumption. As such, consumers should be \nencouraged to support the local economy as far as possible.  \nTo conclude, Madam Speaker, the economic and financial legacy of the previous \ngovernment is well and truly catastrophic. It will take a lot of discipline and hard work to put \nthe country back on the rails of progress and prosperity. Given the precarious situation the \ncountry finds itself in, it could have been justified to walk away from the promise of the 14th \nmonth bonus. But the Special Allowance Bill shows the commitment of this newly elected \nGovernment to make good on its electoral promises in spite of the challenging economic \ncircumstances. \nMadam Speaker, this Government has been given a clear mandate to improve the \neconomic situation of the population. While the 14th bonus will certainly alleviate the \nfinancial constraints of households for the coming months, it would certainly not prove to be \na long-term solution. It is high time that we move from the illusion of progress to the reality \nof progress. As such, the true barometer of economic progress will be the forthcoming \nstructural and fundamental economic reforms which will be put forward by the hon. Prime \nMinister and Minister of Finance in the next budget.  \nI thank you and all hon. MPs for their time and attention. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Etwareea! \n(7.13 p.m.) \nMr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or): Madame la \nprésidente, les résultats des récentes élections ont rendu la liberté à toute la population. On l’a \nvu partout dans le pays. Les mesures spéciales annoncées par le gouvernement, plus \nparticulièrement l’annonce du 14e mois dont on débat aujourd’hui et les autres mesures, \nnotamment la baisse du prix de l’essence, par exemple, vont rendre le sourire au pays. Ce \n\n130 \n \npays avait arrêté de sourire depuis un moment et on avait besoin de cela. Donc, avec la liberté \nretrouvée et des sourires revenus, on ne peut que penser du bien de ce qui entraîne du passé.  \nMadame la présidente, l’objectif de mon intervention, aujourd’hui, est de saluer le \nprojet présenté par l’honorable ministre du Travail, et à travers lui, tout le gouvernement qui \nfait tout ce qui est possible, comme l’a dit le Premier ministre, dans les circonstances \néconomiques données. Le déboursement du 14e mois viendra soulager la plus grande partie \ndes salariés ainsi que tous les bénéficiaires d'allocations sociales diverses.  \nLe versement renforcera leur pouvoir d’achat qui n’a cessé de dégringoler au fil des \nannées. On connaît les raisons, c’est à cause des augmentations des prix des productions ainsi \nque par la dévaluation constante et voulue de notre roupie par le pouvoir sortant. On sait que \nla roupie a perdu 46 % de sa valeur par rapport au dollar les dix dernières années. \nLe gouvernement sortant a trompé toute la population tout au long de ces 10 dernières \nannées en créant une illusion de richesse, le tout reposant sur la manipulation du compte – on \nen a parlé ce matin au moment des questions. Le pillage des fonds publics, on en a aussi parlé \nà l’heure des questions, et un endettement vertigineux qui met l’avenir en risque et un \nendettement qui dépasse aujourd’hui les 80 % sur notre produit intérieur brut.  \nThe Special Allowance Bill restaurera, tant que ça peut, le pouvoir d’achat et améliorera \nla qualité de vie de nos compatriotes, certes. Mais elle aura aussi un autre impact non \nnégligeable psychologique, certes. L’annonce de cette décision – c'est une promesse \ngouvernementale de l’Alliance du Changement – va rendre le sourire aux Mauriciens. Je vais \nvous dire et je vais faire un état des lieux de ceux qui avaient repris notre sourire. \nMadame la présidente, en fait, notre pays est plongé dans le malheur ces dernières \nannées. Selon l’édition 2024 du Happiness Index Report réalisé par Gallup, les Nations unies \net l’université d’Oxford et qui mesure le bien-être, un rapport dévoilé le 20 mars dernier, \nnous avons dégringolé de la 52e à la 70e place en une année. Au hit-parade de ce classement, \nnous nous retrouvons pratiquement au milieu de ce classement qui répertorie le niveau de \nbonheur de 143 pays. Nous ne sommes pas en si bonne compagnie. Au 69ᵉ rang, on retrouve \nla République dominicaine – et je n’ai aucun mépris pour ce pays – et à la 73ᵉ place, la \nMoldavie, juste avant la Russie. Donc, nous sommes à la 70e place ! \nEn 2021, donc trois ans plus tôt, l’île Maurice occupait le 50e rang. Donc, le recul est \nformidable, une façon de le dire. Le recul en termes de bien-être se constate aussi dans le \n\n131 \n \nrapport sur le développement humain publié chaque année par le programme des Nations \nunies pour les développements, le PNUD, comme nous le connaissons. L’édition 2024 classe \nMaurice au 72e rang sur 193 pays. En 2018, nous occupions la 65e place sur 189 pays. \nL’indice de développement humain tient compte non seulement du revenu, mais aussi des \nindicateurs comme l’espérance de vie, de l’accès à l’éducation, à la santé, mais aussi du \nrespect des libertés fondamentales dans le pays.  \nLe respect de la liberté, parlons-en, Madame la présidente, c’est le recul en fait. Le \nrapport de 2024 de l’institut V-Dem lié au département des sciences politiques de l’université \nde Göteborg en Suède place Maurice dans le Top 10 des États en voie d’autocratisassion. \nL’institut V-Dem n’invente rien. La démocratie à Maurice au niveau des administrations \nrégionales avec les élections renvoyées à plusieurs reprises, la démocratie parlementaire – les \ncollègues ici en savent quelque chose – la liberté d’expression par le muselage de la presse \nsont des tristes réalités.  \n Ce déclin, dont je vous parle et qui nous avait repris le sourire, a débuté en 2018, a \nnoté l’institut V-Dem. Puis, pour notre bonheur, un changement de paradigme s’est opéré le \nfameux 10 novembre. Les résultats des élections ont confirmé que la population souffrait en \nsilence et dans la peur ces dernières années. Tout le monde a parlé de liberté retrouvée et de \nnouvel espoir. Tout le monde l’a constaté et tout le monde a retrouvé aujourd’hui le sourire \navec la perspective de toucher le 14e mois et une augmentation du pouvoir d’achat et la \npossibilité d’améliorer les conditions de vie. \nMadame la présidente, l’allocation du 14e mois par le gouvernement de l’Alliance du \nChangement traduit une promesse en termes de pouvoir d’achat. Il y a certes une polémique \nautour du plafond de R 50 000. On en a parlé, nous ne voilons pas la face. Ce n’est pas le \ngouvernement actuel qui l’impose, mais c’est bien l’état des finances publiques qui n’accorde \npas de marge de manœuvre et qui dicte ce plafond. \nMonsieur le leader de l’opposition, qui a tant parlé tout à l’heure, est parti et j’ai \nremarqué qu’il fait cela souvent : au moment où il doit écouter ses pairs, très souvent, il n’est \npas là. Tout à l’heure, on a vu aussi que le Chief Whip, l’autre député, n’est pas là depuis le \ndébut. Donc, ce sont des gens qui ne veulent pas voir la vérité. \nNous héritons d’une économie saccagée sauvagement par un gouvernement sortant, \nirresponsable et pas du tout soucieux de l’avenir de nos enfants. Comme cadeau de départ, \n\n132 \n \nl’ancien régime nous laisse, aux jeunes, une dette de R500 000 dès leur naissance. Il est \névident que chaque pas de ce nouveau gouvernement est surveillé de près par les agences de \nnotation. Moody’s nous a à l’œil. Et les risques d’un downgrade sont réels.  \nMadame la présidente, nous connaissons tous que les conséquences d’une baisse de \nnotation sont très fâcheuses. Le taux de rendement sur les obligations à 10 ans, qui sont de \nréférence, va grimper s’il y a un downgrade, et ça veut dire que le pays devra payer un taux \nd’intérêt encore plus élevé pour emprunter sur le marché. Ce taux d’intérêt sur les obligations \nde 10 ans a déjà atteint les 4,9 % en décembre 2018. Alors, je vous laisse imaginer si, en cas \nde downgrade, ce taux va augmenter jusqu’à 6 % ou 7 %. Nous nous souvenons tous de ce \nqui s’est produit avec la Grèce quand la Grèce n’avait pas réussi à rembourser sa dette, c’était \nen 2013-2014, et qui avait plongé toute l’Union européenne dans une récession. \nCela dit, Madame la présidente, il est clair que Moody’s nous a à l’œil et nous sommes \nsuspendus à ce que Moody’s va nous dire, mais un jour il faudra aussi se poser la question : \nqui est Moody’s ? Nous sommes malheureusement pris dans une logique où ces organisations \nà but lucratif ont un si grand pouvoir sur la marche de notre économie et d’autres économies \ndes pays en voie de développement. Un jour, effectivement, il faudra poser la question de \nsavoir qui va noter les agences de notation. Il faudra la poser en alliance avec d’autres pays et \nmettre en question leur puissance, mais ce n’est pas ici la plateforme aujourd’hui de le faire. \nMadame la présidente, il est évident que l’ancien régime a pratiqué la politique. Je vais \nreprendre cette phrase parce que mon collègue tout à l’heure a parlé de la politique de terre \nbrûlée, merci. Il y a une autre expression qui a été utilisée à maintes reprises :« après moi, le \ndéluge ». Cette fameuse expression est prêtée à Louis XV qui voulait faire savoir à ses \npartisans qu’il se moquait complètement de ce que pourrait faire son dauphin Louis XVI et a \nété reprise par la suite, le plus récemment dans l’histoire contemporaine, par le triste \nmaréchal Mobutu Sese Seko qui, à l’époque, était le président de la république du Zaïre, à \nprésent la république du Congo. Fervent admirateur de Machiavel, après 32 ans de règne \nbrutal et une fuite honteuse de son pays en 1997, il avait effectivement laissé un pays en ruine \ncomme vient de le faire le gouvernement sortant. Sans faire de comparaison avec le Zaïre de \nl’époque et Mobutu Sese Seko, le Premier ministre sortant et sa bande organisée de pilleurs \nont laissé nos finances publiques en lambeaux et cela nous mènera peut-être aux Fonds \nmonétaire international. Je n’aime pas cette perspective. Je sais que la discipline fiscale et \n\n133 \n \nbudgétaire s’impose, et c’est cela qui va plaire à nos bailleurs de fonds, y compris à nos pays \namis. \nMadame la présidente, le gouvernement a fait le choix difficile de demander aux hauts \nsalaires de faire un sacrifice. C’est le prix à payer pour sortir de l’ornière, pour éviter un \ndowngrade de la fameuse note de Moody’s et pour accéder aux prêts du FMI. Espérons que si \nnous allons au FMI, les conditions des emprunts seront les plus avantageuses pour nous, mais \nnous savons qu’une fois qu’on entre au FMI, ça devient très difficile d’en sortir. Pour la suite, \nMadame la présidente, nous attendons la publication du programme gouvernemental qui \ndonnera les orientations de la politique économique et financière pour ces prochaines années, \net là nous y verrons, nous y commenterons en place et lieu. Merci, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much. I should have said to hon. Mr Parapen as \nwell; I think they were both doing maiden speeches which I think is a very sexist term.  \n(Interruptions) \nI am joking. I am joking. But you will surely get other possibilities as you just \nmentioned l’indice de bonheur et tout ça ; même ça, il faut se poser une question. Alors, on \nva peut-être, sur ces indices-là, se lever et peut-être aller se détendre un peu. Une heure et \ndemie ? One and a half hours for dinner? I would have said one hour, but maybe un petit peu \nplus d’une heure, on va dire. On coupe la poire en deux : one hour and 15 minutes.  \nAt 7.27 p.m. the Sitting was suspended.  \nOn resuming at 8.46 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated. We reached the quorum so we can start. Hon. Dr. \nAumeer ! \nDr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port louis Central): Merci, \nMadame la présidente, de me donner l’occasion de participer à ce débat sur un projet de loi \nqui est la toute première pour cette session parlementaire.  \nJe dois tout d’abord féliciter le gouvernement pour sa très grande victoire indiscutable \naux dernières élections législatives, elle-même synonyme du sentiment et de la volonté de la \npopulation, et je me rappelle bien d’un mot qui s’était servi souvent pendant la session \nparlementaire de ces cinq dernières années, le mot « claque ». Il se disait souvent par l’ancien \nPremier ministre que cette victoire, le résultat et l’ampleur de cette victoire, est une claque \n\n134 \n \nmagistrale au style d’autocrate qu’avaient pratiqué l’ancien Premier ministre et son \ngouvernement. Donc, un mandat clair et sans équivoque à l’alliance du changement pour \nredéfinir le destin de ce pays. \nJe voudrais aussi vous féliciter pour votre élection à la présidence de cette Chambre et \npour cette bouffée d’air frais que vous apportez après cinq longues années très chaotiques et \ntumultueuses que personnellement moi-même et plusieurs ont vécues dans cette Chambre. \nJ’en suis sûr, que sous votre présidence, cette auguste Assemblée retrouvera ses lettres de \nnoblesse tant attendues, qu’on appelle le temple de la démocratie. \nMadame la présidente, ce projet de loi qui nous est présenté survient dans un contexte \nextrêmement difficile, voire même très compliqué et difficile, surtout que le gouvernement \nest confronté à des réalités économiques implacables. Personne dans cette chambre n’aurait \nimaginé l’état précaire de notre économie, à quel point elle a été mal gérée, avec d’énormes \ndettes dans plusieurs secteurs clés de notre économie, et réduit à presque nul la marge de \nmanœuvre pour honorer les promesses électorales que nous avons promises à la population. \nMais ce gouvernement va honorer ses promesses, quitte à faire des ajustements difficiles et \ndouloureux pour certains. Il va falloir que nous contribuions tous ensemble à relever ces pays \ndans un élan patriotique, et je peux vous assurer à tous qui nous écoutent ici et ailleurs que le \nmeilleur est à venir. \nMadame la présidente, les chiffres ne mentent pas, les caisses sont vides, les \nengagements électoraux se heurtent aux limites budgétaires, comme l’a si bien dit un \néditorialiste récemment. Récemment, tout à l’heure, le leader de l’opposition avait fait \nréférence au fait que c’était le Premier ministre d’avant qui avait proposé le 14ᵉ mois et le \nPremier ministre actuel avait bien dit pendant la campagne électorale que c’est nous qui \nallons la payer. Mais autant, comme dirait le lambda mauricien, le Premier ministre d’alors et \nson gouvernement auraient promis tout ce qu’ils pouvaient. \nEt avec un certain sens de l’humour, certains disaient même « les contraventions de rue \nseront gratuites », parce qu’ils allaient nous proposer et allaient tout dire pour appâter et \ngagner les élections. Il fallait tout donner, voire même sinon aller vers une faillite \néconomique. \nL’état de l’économie, comme l’a présenté le Premier ministre mardi dernier, est une \nindication à quel point les chiffres ont été manipulés par l’ex-ministre des Finances pour créer \n\n135 \n \nun mirage de boom économique. À un certain temps, ils parlaient d’un budget de trillion. \nBien sûr, ils rêvaient, mais en réalité, un fiasco total qui nous aurait emmenés tout droit à la \nfaillite, tel que le Sri Lanka ou d’autres pays comme la Grèce. \nMadame la présidente, des chiffres qui font peur, une dette publique de R 238 milliards \nen 2014 pour arriver à R 559 milliards en 2024. Donc, il n’y a aucun doute que l’affaire \néconomique a été très mal gérée, mais en sus de cela, il y a une partie de cette dette qui a été \ndue au paiement aux clients de l’ex-BAI, le Betamax, le Neotown. Et la philosophie de \nl’ancien gouvernement était basée sur la vendetta politique. Une vengeance à la sueur du \npeuple, et en juin de cette année, 83 % de notre PIB, nos produits bruts, et en décembre 2014, \nn’étaient qu’à 59 %. 83 % cette année, 59 % en 2014, et vous dites que la comparaison est \nclaire. Il n’y a pas de photo. \nUne croissance économique à seulement 5,1 % qui a été gonflée à 7 %, une dévaluation \npersistante et fulgurante de notre monnaie mauricienne vis-à-vis du dollar, une dépréciation \nvertigineuse de 5 % annuellement de 2020 à 2024, et quand on regarde les chiffres de \ndécembre 2014 à novembre 2024, 46 % de notre roupie a été dévaluée en comparaison au \ndollar. Le faible taux d’investissement de l’étranger, un déficit budgétaire de 5,7 % qui nous a \nété annoncé, qu’on a dû revoir maintenant, mais qui était au lieu de 3,9 %, un chiffre \nimaginaire et qui a été dit dans les budgets ad nauseam pendant les trois dernières années. Un \ndéficit de R 38 milliards, c’est ce que ce nouveau gouvernement va devoir trouver pour \ncombler le fossé, faire des paiements et honorer les ajustements salariaux. \nLa faillite du CSG, un déficit de R 9 milliards à prévoir cette année. Ceux qui ont été \ndans cette Chambre pendant la dernière session vont se rappeler d’une question \nparlementaire, quand le ministre des Finances, implacablement, sans aucune gêne, nous disait \nque le coffre de la CSG était vide. Les dettes des entreprises publiques – \n• \nLe Metro Express se taille la part du lion, R 15 milliards ; \n• \nLe National Property Fund, R 9 milliards; \n• \nLe New Social Living Development, R 1 milliard; \n• \nLa CEB, R 6.8 milliards; \n• \nLe State Trading Corporation, R 970 millions, et \n• \nl’avance qu’on a fait à Air Mauritius est encore plus grandissante. \n\n136 \n \nLes deals de la MIC qui sont mal structurés, Menlo Park qu’on vient de découvrir qui \nbénéficie de R 50 millions décaissées en 24 heures et clairement avec la bénédiction de l’ex-\ngouverneur centrale de la Banque de Maurice qui, rappelons-nous, va retourner sur un \ndifférend tapis rouge à son arrivée à l’aéroport dans les jours qui viennent. R 250 millions \nétaient en attente pour être décaissés. Heureusement, nous avons un nouveau gouverneur à la \nBanque de Maurice et des gens responsables, tel que le Premier ministre et le Deputy Prime \nMinister, pour empêcher ce genre de folies. \nAugmentation des prix des commodités de 10, et je dis de 10 %, à 110 % depuis 2014. \nCela ne vous fait pas peur ? Moi, j’en ai les frissons. Heureusement, comme le disait \nbeaucoup, il y a un Dieu pour ce pays, et aujourd’hui ce gouvernement, avec le Dr. Navin \nRamgoolam à la tête et ministre des Finances, largement plébiscité par le peuple, va redresser \nla barre dans le temps qu’il faut et, en tant que gouvernement responsable, ne va nullement \nmener ce pays à la dérive. \nMadame la présidente, ce que je viens d’expliquer et ce que je viens d’énumérer \nexplique pourquoi l’octroi du 14ᵉ mois a été réservé aux revenus plafonnés à R 50 000. Une \ndécision – j’en suis sûr – très difficile, mais il y a quand même une considération spéciale aux \nplus vulnérables de notre société dans n’importe quel fragment qu’il soit loti. \nMadame la présidente, aujourd’hui mon intervention portera sur le projet de loi ‘The \nSpecial Allowance Bill, No. XX de 2024 dont l’essentiel concerne le paiement du 14ᵉ mois, et \nqui a été qualifié d’un paiement unique d’une allocation spéciale pour l’année 2024 aux \nemployés percevant un salaire de base mensuel ne dépassant pas R 50 000. Il ne faut pas \noublier que ce paiement fait partie d’un package, d’un ensemble qui comprend non seulement \nle 14ᵉ mois, mais aussi la compensation salariale, les salaires, la baisse du prix de l’essence et \ndu diesel. \nMadame la présidente, je vais couper court aux principaux points de discorde, si tant est \nque je puisse m’y référer en tant que tel, car il y a eu plusieurs débats, beaucoup de débats, \ndes conférences de presse, dans la presse et dans le public en général au cours de la semaine \nécoulée. Qui sont ceux qui bénéficieront du paiement unique d’une allocation spéciale \nsusmentionnée ? \nMadame la présidente, je prends la parole aujourd’hui en tant que député d’arrière-\nbanc, ce qu’on appelle backbencher, mais qui est assis à l’avant-garde. Mon travail consiste à \nremettre en question et à pousser le gouvernement sur des questions qui touchent l’ensemble \n\n137 \n \nde la population. Bon nombre des électeurs et de la population générale, en particulier ceux \nqui sont des travailleurs autonomes, m’ont demandé pourquoi ce paiement unique ne leur \navait pas été accordé. Je crois qu’il est sensé de ma part d’aborder le sujet. Nous nous \nsommes engagés tout au long de la dernière campagne électorale à ce qu’une fois élus, nous \npayions ladite indemnité spéciale à tous les travailleurs du pays. Et je dois souligner ici que, \npar « travailleurs », j’entends l’ensemble de la classe ouvrière, c’est-à-dire un travailleur tel \nque défini dans le Workers Rights Act 2019. Il est toutefois regrettable que tous les \ntravailleurs d’aujourd’hui à Maurice ne pourront pas et nous ne sommes pas en mesure de \nbénéficier d’une telle allocation spéciale, d’autant plus que cela leur aurait certainement aidé \nà leurs dépenses de fin d’année et peut-être offert un moment spécial une fois dans l’année. \nMais la réalité des caisses de l’État est très différente, pour ne pas dire alarmante, de ce qu’on \nappelle, comme l’a dit le Deputy Prime Minister : ‘economic mess’. \nNotre proposition à l’époque était une proposition faite en tout bon sens et était basée \ndans une large mesure sur ce que le gouvernement sortant avait proposé. Oui, nous avons dit \nque nous allons faire le même. Nous pensions sérieusement à cette époque que les caisses de \nl’État auraient été en mesure de donner le 14 mois à tous les Mauriciens. Mais, un mois plus \ntard, tout ce que je peux dire c’est que les comptes du gouvernement n’étaient pas entre les \nmains des personnes responsables et honnêtes envers la population et en qui, on ne peut \njamais et jamais leur faire confiance encore. Comme l’a bien dit une fois le Premier ministre, \nil faut les mettre dans la poubelle de l’histoire.  \nJe me demande, en écoutant toutes les discussions qui se sont écoulées pendant ces \nderniers jours, comment l’ancien gouvernement sortant de l’époque aurait financé ce 14ᵉ \nmois. C’était une réflexion que je me suis faite et j’ai conclu que l’astuce de l’ex-argentier \nétait d’imprimer la roupie, d’augmenter son offre d’un système qui a détruit sa valeur et de la \ndépréciation de la roupie. \nC’est pourquoi je dirais que c’était un gouvernement non seulement irresponsable, mais \nqui n’avait pas à cœur l’intérêt de ce pays, et des enfants et des petits-enfants qui vont venir. \nMadame la présidente, pourtant, nous ne sommes pas revenus sur notre promesse. Nous \navons fait ce que nous avons pu. Nous n’avons pas trompé la population qui, non seulement, \nnous a donné un mandat clair pour gérer, mais aussi pour la remettre sur les rails. Et pour \ncela, Madame la présidente, nous devons être responsables. Ce que nous faisons, nous \ndemandons la solidarité de tous les Mauriciens, car cette solidarité est requise. L’avenir de \n\n138 \n \nnos enfants et de la future génération doit être sécurisé, et non pas hypothéqué par des actions \nque nous regretterons à long terme. Heureusement, ils ne sont plus au pouvoir. \nMadame la présidente, donc, après avoir examiné le projet de loi, je dois dire qu’il est \nlouable qu’une très grande partie de la population bénéficie de cette allocation spéciale, le \nquatorzième mois. Mais je voudrais quand même faire une petite proposition qui concerne \nprincipalement ceux qui sont indépendants, ce qu’on appelle les self-employed. Le \ngouvernement pourrait peut-être un jour, dans les mois à venir, on ne sait pas quand, \nconsidérer à examiner la possibilité d’un paiement unique d’un montant fixe aux travailleurs \nindépendants qui ont un revenu de pas plus de R 50 000 et qui ne ferait qu’à combler le fossé \nentre ceux qui ont bénéficié de l’allocation et ceux qui en sont indépendants. Mais ce n’est \nqu’une proposition. L’état de la caisse mauricienne et l’état de nos affaires ne sont pas à leur \nmieux. Cette proposition, telle que je la fais, démontre que nous avons à cœur et que nous \nconsidérons les appels de tout un chacun qui se dit travailleur dans ce pays.  \nMadame la présidente, je dis cela parce que je note d’après l’alinéa, section 3, sous-\nsection (5) (b) du projet de loi sur les allocations spéciales qu’il existe une autre possibilité \npour un employeur et son employé de convenir que l’allocation spéciale sera payée et versée \nen quatre versements jusqu’à mars 2025. Il y a peut-être suffisamment de réconfort, à mon \nhumble avis, pour qu’une telle proposition soit explorée et considérée en temps et lieu. Ce \nque nous ne voulons pas, c’est que cette population, qui nous a voté et nous a donné une si \ngrande victoire, ait l’impression d’avoir été lésée, mais plutôt, qu’elle voie et ressente l’effort \nde ce gouvernement. Malgré la très mauvaise gestion des fonds publics par le MSM sortant, \non a fait ce qu’on pouvait faire. Pour dire, on a fait le minimum, pour ne pas dire le \nmaximum.  \nMadame la présidente, je félicite donc l’auteur de ce projet de loi, mais je souhaite \nsincèrement que ceux qui ont malheureusement été laissés sur la touche, ou peut-être un peu \ncoincés par l’état de notre économie, en particulier les travailleurs autonomes, à sentir que le \ngouvernement est toujours et sera toujours à leurs côtés, et a leurs intérêts à cœur, d’où ma \nproposition précédente.  \n  Madame la présidente, il y a aussi un autre facteur qui aurait peut-être échappé à \nl’attention de beaucoup. Qu’en est-il des travailleurs indépendants qui ont des employés à \ntemps plein sous leur responsabilité ? Ils ne bénéficient certainement pas de cette allocation \n\n139 \n \nspéciale, mais ils doivent s’occuper des employés qui reçoivent R 50 000 du moins. Un \nbudget additionnel qu’ils n’attendaient pas. Mais dans un élan de solidarité, dans un élan de \nmettre ce pays sur les rails économiques – ce dont on a besoin – avec des chiffres \ncatastrophiques que le Premier ministre nous avait présentés, the state of the economy, peut-\nêtre qu’il y a certainement lieu pour ces deux catégories de personnes d’aider, à leur propre \nfaçon, ce pays à sortir de ce marasme économique. \nMadame la présidente, j’ai fait part de mes points de vue et de mes suggestions à la \nChambre et j’espère sincèrement qu’ils seront pris en considération ou au moins qu’ils feront \nl’objet d’une réflexion. Il aurait été évidemment préférable et idéal que l’allocation spéciale \nsoit versée à tous les travailleurs de ce pays sans distinction, mais en tant que gouvernement \nresponsable, le maximum des maximums a été fait.  \nMadame la présidente, des agences internationales telles que le FMI, la Banque \nmondiale et surtout l’évaluation de notre performance économique par Moody’s sont des \nobservateurs très importants. Comment l’exécutif va gérer l’économie dont la marge de \nmanœuvre est presque nulle ou très limitée, et c’est pourquoi nous devons être responsables \net avoir l’intérêt à long terme de ce pays dans notre prise de décision à court terme. \nPour conclure, je reprends cette phrase de François Mitterrand à l’annonce de sa \nvictoire présidentielle en 1981 : « Enfin, les ennuis commencent. » Mais à la tête avec \nquelqu’un comme le Dr. Navin Ramgoolam, Premier ministre, je suis sûr qu’il mènera le \nbateau à bon port.  \nMerci. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Ameer Meea! \n(9.07 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives (Mr A. Ameer Meea): Thank \nyou, Madam Speaker. It feels good to stand up and to make my speech because we have been \nsitting down for almost three years. \nMadam Speaker, it is with a great sense of honour that I rise today in this august \nAssembly in support of the Special Allowance Bill, which has the commendable objective of \n\n140 \n \nproviding a one-off payment for a special allowance for the year 2024 to eligible employees \nin the Republic of Mauritius drawing a basic wage or salary not exceeding Rs50,000. \nAt the outset, allow me to mention that the Special Allowance Bill stands as a powerful \ntestament to the commitment of the newly elected Government to uplift the working class, \nwhich is a driving force behind the economic progress of the country. Indeed, it is a tangible \ndemonstration of our commitment to providing a lifeline to all those who have been \nconfronted with significant hikes in their cost of living over the last years, which have \nimpacted their quality of life. \nIt is a promise made and a promise kept. Even though some may argue, not completely, \nbut partially. However, one has to keep in mind that Government is navigating through \nextremely challenging economic conditions as a ticking time bomb, if I may say, left by the \nformer political regime.  \nIn reply to what the hon. Leader of the Opposition stated in his reply, that we won the \ngeneral elections because of our promise of the 14th month salary bonus, Madame la \nprésidente, laissez-moi lui administrer une petite dose de rappel. Donc, l’honorable leader de \nl’opposition disait que les chiffres préparés dans le ‘State of the Economy Report’ ne sont \npas bons. Les statistiques et les analyses faites par le leader de l’opposition, savez-vous par \nqui s’étaient préparées à l’époque ? C’était préparé par Pulse Analytics. Ce même Pulse \nAnalytics qui leur donnait gagnant pour les élections générales. Ils ont été balayés 60-0, \nMadame la présidente ! Balayé !  \nCe même Pulse Analytics nous a couté, notre argent, l’argent du public plus d’un \nmillion de dollars, c’est-à-dire R 47 millions of public funds. Ils auront des comptes à rendre. \nIls auront bientôt des comptes à rendre ! Plus de R 250 millions qui ont été committed to \nthem. Une firme soi-disant professionnelle, une firme soi-disant indépendante ! On est en \n2024 ; avoir à faire avec des voyous qui essayaient d’influencer le vote des élections, et leur \ndonner gagnants, et voilà le résultat ! \nIl nous a dit qu’on a gagné les élections par rapport au quatorzième mois. Je vais lui \ndire pourquoi ils ont perdu les élections, Madame la présidente. Pour commencer, il y a eu un \nmismanagement of public funds. Il y a eu un crime économique, comme l’a si bien dit le \nDeputy Prime Minister. Par rapport à la corruption, par rapport au népotisme, qu’est-ce qu’on \n\n141 \n \nn’a pas vu à la State Bank ? Qu’est-ce qu’on n’a pas vu à la Silver Bank ? On a pris des \nmilliards à la municipalité de Port-Louis et à toutes les municipalités.  \nOn a pris des milliards dans les district councils. Aujourd’hui, le gouverneur de la \nbanque nous dit qu’il y a R 8,4 milliards qu’on ne va peut-être pas recouvrir. Bad debt and \ndoubtful debts – R 8.4 milliards et par rapport à la State Bank, trois ans de cela, je faisais ce \ndiscours ici même, R 12 milliards ont été write-off, R 12 milliards. \nVous savez, autrefois la State Bank, c’était un joyau de la couronne pour le \ngouvernement, une banque qui faisait des milliards de profits, une banque cotée en bourse, \nqui gagnait des prêts sur l’Afrique par rapport à la performance. Aujourd’hui, la State Bank \navec des nominations politiques, des gens incompétents, j’ai dit ça plusieurs fois et il faut le \nrépéter. On a prêté de l’argent avec quelqu’un, le lendemain il a fait faillite. Un Indien basé à \nDubaï, il emprunte de l’argent. Où aurait-il dû emprunter ? Soit Dubaï, ou bien en Inde. Il \nvient d’emprunter de l’argent à l’île Maurice, avec la State Bank, et le lendemain, il fait \nfaillite. R 12 milliards qui auraient dû être versés en termes de dividendes dans la caisse de \nl’État et, indirectement, des fonds publics. \nIls ont perdu les élections par rapport au coût de la vie, rising cost of living. Ils ont \nperdu les élections parce qu’ils ont fait du business durant le Covid. Comment un ministre qui \navait fait des unsolicited bid pour acheter des respirateurs, des médicaments passés de R 9 à \nR 79 ? Ils ont perdu les élections parce qu’ils ont violé la démocratie ! Ici même, qu’est-ce \nque nous n’avons pas fait ici dans ce temple de la démocratie ? Un voyou assis où vous vous \nêtes installée maintenant, Madame la présidente. Un bouncer qui nous empêchait nuit et jour \nde faire notre travail, humiliant les députés de l’opposition. C’est pour cela qu’ils ont été \nbottés hors du pouvoir. Ils ont aussi perdu le pouvoir par rapport à l’environnement quand on \nse rappelle ce qui s’est passé par rapport à Wakashio. \nMadame la présidente, les pouvoirs, les rênes du pouvoir étaient hijacked. Hijacked ! \nLes rênes de pouvoirs n’étaient pas dans la main du Premier ministre, les rênes du pouvoir se \ntrouvaient dans la cuisine et c’est la cuisinière elle-même qui donnait des ordres. C’est la \ncuisinière qui donnait des ordres – right, left and centre – qui il fallait recruter, qui il fallait \nmettre dehors basé sur leur religion, leur caste, leur communauté. C’est une honte pour l’île \nMaurice. Ils disent que nous avons gagné les élections par rapport aux promesses de 14ᵉ \nmois, ils ont perdu les élections par rapport à tout ce que je suis en train de dire. \n\n142 \n \nToutes les institutions, Madame la présidente, toutes les institutions, à commencer par \nla police, l’ICTA, l’IBA, la FIU, la MRA, je peux nommer toute une liste d'institutions qui ont \nété pourries. L’indépendance des institutions a été tous contrôlée, pas par le gouvernement, \nmême pas par le gouvernement, même pas par le conseil des ministres, mais par la cuisine. \nC’est la cuisine qui contrôlait toutes les institutions qui auraient dû être des institutions \npubliques. La Banque de Maurice, une institution prestigieuse, qui aurait dû faire la fierté de \nnotre pays. La Banque de Maurice était contrôlée par la cuisine et ses complices, Madame la \nprésidente, et par rapport à la MIC, donc je disais précédemment tout l’argent qui a été \ndéboursé par la MIC, et ils osent dire que nous sommes contrôlés par le secteur privé. Allez \nvoir la liste des bénéficiaires de la MIC. La liste des bénéficiaires de la MIC : qui a bénéficié \nde ça ? C’est le secteur privé. Il fallait donner de l’argent pour sortir du Covid, mais ne nous \naccusons pas d’être à la solde du secteur privé quand c’est ce que vous avez fait avec la MIC. \nEt en dernier lieu, par rapport à pourquoi ils ont perdu les élections, quand ils ont coupé \nles réseaux sociaux. Quand ils ont coupé les réseaux sociaux dans un pays comme l’île \nMaurice, les jeunes se sont manifestés et ils sont sortis pour aller voter massivement notre \nalliance, c’est une des raisons encore pourquoi ils ont perdu les élections. Donc, c’est un peu \ndommage, mais quand même que le leader de l’opposition n’est pas là, mais je vois que son \nex-partenaire est là. Donc, ils prennent le relais parce que je crois qu’ils se sont fâchés après \nles élections. Donc, quand l’un est là, l’autre n’est pas là, donc… \nMr Assirvaden : Ex-partner ! \nMr Ameer Meea: Ex-partner. Donc, Madame la présidente, let me now come back to \nthe Bill, mais il fallait répondre à tout ce que le leader de l’opposition avait dit, j’aurais mis \nmes lunettes.  \nDonc, as I said, it was a promise, and we kept that promise. Madam Speaker, the \ndaunting trials confronting our economy today are manifold and intimidating. Real GDP \ngrowth has been revised down by 25.1% for 2024, reflecting a slower than expected \nrecovery. Inflation while on a downward trajectory remains a lingering burden on households \nwith prices of essential goods still elevated. Public Sector Debt has surged to 83.4% of GDP \nas of June of 2024, pushing our fiscal space to its limit. \nSadly, I can only echo the words of our hon. Prime Minister, who described such a \nshocking state of affairs as a voodoo economic situation hardly seen anywhere else in the \n\n143 \n \nworld. Behind these figures lie stories of businesses grappling with rising costs and \nhouseholds struggling to make ends meet. Our labour market faces acute skills mismatches \nand unemployment while declining and leaves too many youths and women without \nmeaningful opportunities. The ripple effects of these economic conditions are felt mostly and \nacutely by our small and medium enterprises and the manufacturing sector, the backbone of \nour economy. Since it relates to my ministry, please allow me to dwell a few minutes on this. \nMadam Speaker, faced with this devastating situation, we had no alternative other than \nto implement the payment of the 14th month bonus in a targeted manner. Such a course of \naction has been a difficult decision but was essential to ensure the long-term sustainability of \nour public finances and mitigate the looming risk of an economic downturn. \nMadam Speaker, this Government had a choice to make and we opted for fiscal \nresponsibility along with macro-economic stability and as such, we choose to safeguard the \neconomic well-being of our nation and lay the foundation for future growth and prosperity in \nthe years to come. I have obviously a special thought for all those hardworking employees \nwho, in one way or the other, do not qualify for the 14th month bonus at this point in time For \nthem, my message is that Government is fervidly aware that this situation could resonate as \nbeing unpalatable, one to some extent but rest assured we remain committed to finding ways \nto support all workers so that in the end, everyone can emerge as winners. \nMadame la présidente, à ce moment précis, il est convenant de dire que Rome ne s’est \npas construite en un jour. The sacrifices made today will be remembered, and they will \ndefinitely yield dividends in the future as we move along the process of strengthening our \neconomic architecture. \nMadam Speaker, the provision of this Bill designed to introduce a one-off special \nallowance commonly referred to as a 14th month allowance to employees earning a basic \nsalary wage or not exceeding Rs50,000 stands as a testament to this Government’s \nunwavering dedication to safeguarding the welfare of our workers. This endeavour is \nparticularly poignant as we contend with an economy left in a precarious and fragile state by \nthe previous administration. \nMadam Speaker, Clause 8 of the Bill, which amends the Income Tax Act to facilitate \nfinancial assistance for employers in a specific category, is a masterstroke in balancing the \ndual objective of workforce welfare and enterprise sustainability. Under this provision, SMEs \n\n144 \n \nand Export Enterprises as well as other prescribed categories of businesses, can claim \nfinancial assistance equivalent to the special allowance paid to the employees if they meet \ncertain conditions. These include businesses operating at a loss or substantial profit reduction. \nEmployers who incurred accounting losses for the year of assessment 2023-24 or \nwhose profit will be reduced by 50% due to the combined effect of additional remuneration, \nminimum wage increases and special allowance are eligible for full reimbursement of the \nallowance. Also, in terms of moderate profit reduction for enterprises bad experience a profit \nreduction of over 10%, the Bill allows for partial reimbursement equivalent to 50% of the \nspecial allowance paid to eligible employees and to streamline the application process, the \nmechanism for applying these reimbursements through an electronic system managed by the \nDirector General of the MRA reflects a pragmatic and efficient approach ensuring businesses \ncan access this support without undue administrative burdens. \nMadam Speaker, these provisions are vital life lines for SMEs which are often more \nvulnerable to cash flow constraints and economic fluctuations. The Bill thus ensures that the \ncommendable goal of providing financial relief to employees does not come at the cost of the \nsurvival of businesses. Madam Speaker, SMEs are not merely contributors to our GDP, they \nare the cornerstone of employment generation, innovation and regional economic stability. \nThe Bill recognises the pivotal role by enabling them to sustain operations even while \nfulfilling their obligation under the Special Allowance provisions. The inclusion of SMEs in \nthe eligibility criteria for financial assistance is especially significant. \nBy doing so, the Bill not only supports individual enterprises but also strengthens a \nbroader ecosystem of entrepreneurship and corporate development, which is essential for \nfostering exclusive growth. Madam Speaker, let me quickly say a few words on the \nmanufacturing industry and particularly the export-oriented segment, which is having to \nmanoeuvre in a complex and difficult trading landscape, and if I may add, compounded with \na discerning future outlook. \nWithout bold and decisive actions, this strenuous situation threatens to worsen. \nHowever, I can assure the House that at the level of my ministry, my officers are already \nworking on finding tangible solutions to bring about a major transformation in the overall \nindustrial development process. \nAt this point in time, I have to acknowledge that the Bill’s requirement for a one-time \npayment of the 14th month allowance could create an unexpected strain on the financial \n\n145 \n \nresources, especially for enterprises with a large workforce. Nonetheless, I note with \nsatisfaction that the Special Allowance Bill at Clause 8, as I said earlier, has provisioned for \nthe payment of special allowance to assist eligible export-oriented enterprises with the \npayment of the 14th month bonus. Indeed, this assistance will provide the much-needed \nlifeline to our export operators who are in financial distress to meet the cost associated with \nthis exceptional social measure. \nAdditionally, Madam Speaker, I wish to convey a message to our industry operators \nthat this Government will stand by their side to support them in these difficult moments to \nensure their long-term viability. Madam Speaker, now I will conclude because time is really \nrunning off. As I conclude my intervention, let me reiterate that this Special Allowance Bill \nbeing introduced in Parliament today is more than just a simple policy measure. It is a \npromise kept to the nation and a clear signal that this new Government means business as we \nwalk the talk. The payment of the 14th month bonus is a first in the history of Mauritius and \nthis Government will always be remembered for this bold initiative. \nMadam Speaker, the destiny of our country is being rewritten. A new chapter of \neconomic prosperity awaits us. As a true patriot, it is with immense pride that I rise today in \nfull support of this landmark bill. I am done. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Minister! \nDr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, I beg to move for the adjournment of the debate. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to.  \nDebate adjourned accordingly. \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Friday 20 December 2024 at 3.00 p.m. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned. \nAt 9.27 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Friday 20 December 2024 \nat 3.00 p.m. \n\n146 \n \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nSAFE CITY PROJECT – INSTALLED CAMERAS – COST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/88",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 88,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands —",
      "question": "(No. B/88) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nHousing and Lands whether, in regard to assistance extended for the repair of damaged \nconcrete housing units and/or rusty corrugated iron sheets housing units, he will state if his \nMinistry proposes to revisit the national policy or devise such a policy to meet the needs for a \nproper shelter for vulnerable families, indicating if the policy will be extended to potential \nbeneficiaries in Rodrigues.",
      "answer": "Reply: Since there has been recent change in Government, the national policy for a \nproper shelter for vulnerable families will be revisited in line with the measures to be \nannounced in the forthcoming Government Programme 2025-2029. \n \nDRIVING INSTRUCTOR’S LICENCE – RECEIVED APPLICATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/89",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 89,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Riviére du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness —",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness —\n\nWhether, in regard to waiting hours in public hospitals, he will\nstate if a survey has been carried out thereinto and, if so, indicate\nthe (a) average waiting time upon a patient being advised for\nadmission and the time admitted to the ward (b) hours spent by\nan inpatient on being discharged and the time the latter leaves\nthe ward?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/90",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 90,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr Francois)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports —",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Youth and Sports —\n\nWhether, in regard to the first FIFA Indian Ocean Youth Festival\nto be held from 16 to 22 December 2024 in Madagascar, he will\nstate (a) if FIFA will bear the full cost of participation therein\n(b) the countries invited to participate thereinto and (c) if\ninvitation to participate thereinto was extended to Rodrigues and,\nif so, is participation thereto being envisaged and, if not, why\nnot?\n\nYZ OOO ZG\nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius: Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364\nEmail: clerk@govmu.org Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org\n\n--- PAGE 13 ---\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS PAGE 14 of 15",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/91",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 91,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport —",
      "question": "(No. B/91) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to Driving Instructor’s Licence \ngranted in June 2024, he will state the number of applications received therefor, indicating \nthe number of – \n(a)  successful candidates thereof, and  \n(b)  licences not yet granted as at date, indicating the reasons therefor, if any.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nTAMARIN, LA PRENEUSE & BLACK RIVER – BYPASS PROJECT – \nFEASIBILITY STUDY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/92",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 92,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure —",
      "question": "(No. B/92) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the villages of Tamarin, La Preneuse \nand Black River, he will state if his Ministry is in presence of any project for the construction \n\n152 \n \nof a bypass in the region of Yemen to alleviate the heavy traffic thereat, indicating if a \nfeasibility study has already been carried out in that regard.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nNATIONAL WHOLESALE MARKET – VEGETABLES & FRUITS AUCTIONS \n– MODE OF OPERATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/93",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 93,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries —",
      "question": "(No. B/93) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the coming into operation of the National Wholesale Market at Wooton in 2023, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the modalities put in place for the \nauctions of vegetables and fruits thereat indicating if – \n(a) \nthe purpose for the setting up thereof has been achieved, and \n(b) \nnew measures are being envisaged to review the mode of operation thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: The current facilities at the National Wholesale Market include an auction hall \nof 6,700 m2, some 46 loading bays, and parking space of 1,375 m2.   \nThe Mauritius Agricultural Marketing (National Wholesale Market) Regulations 2023, \nprovide for the modalities for the auctions of vegetables and fruits at the National Wholesale \nMarket, which are as follows – \n(i) \nDelivery: suppliers (growers) deliver their produce through designated gates \nfrom 04 30 hours to 15 00 hours on weekdays (except for Wednesdays when the \nNational Wholesale Market is closed for cleaning purposes) and from 04 30 \nhours to 08 00 hours on Saturdays; \n(ii) \nGrading: goods delivered are then graded by the suppliers (growers) and \nlabelled by both auctioneers and suppliers (growers), before being put on \nauction at the Market; \n(iii) Auction: auctions are carried out from 05.30 hours to 12. 30 hours on weekdays \n(excluding Wednesdays) and on Saturdays, and \n(iv) Payment: buyers pay auctioneers directly, with suppliers receiving payment \nwithin a few days. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, the National Wholesale Market was set up as a \nfinancially self-sustaining enterprise, with the key objective of providing a modern marketing \ninfrastructure for the handling of fruits and vegetables in compliance with relevant \n\n153 \n \nagricultural and food norms and standards. However, the following shortcomings have to be \naddressed – \n(a) \nno provision has been made for a dedicated fruit auction hall due to which, fruit \nauctioneers are accommodated in temporary tents during peak fruit seasons, that \nis, from October to February; \n(b) \nthe Market is still not fitted-out with a sewer treatment plant, adequate parking \nspace, controlled access points, toll gate and weighbridge. These additional \nfacilities are expected to cost Government an amount of Rs100 million, and \n(c) \nsmall growers and dealers residing in the northern and eastern regions have \nmade representations regarding high transport costs to access the National \nWholesale Market, which add up to their operating costs. \nIt is to be noted that the National Wholesale Market project has been subject to \ncriticisms of the National Audit Office in its reports for the financial years 2018-2019, 2020-\n2021 and 2021-2022, as well as more recently by the Public Accounts Committee. \nAlso, the National Wholesale Market has been operating at a deficit since its launching.  \nThe operational costs of the Market over the period July 2023 to December 2024 was \nRs49,732,578 while only an amount of Rs16,039,300 was generated as revenue. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, a committee is being set up to make \nrecommendations on making the National Wholesale Market financially sustainable. The \nOperations Committee of the Board of the Agricultural Marketing Board, on its part, would \nlook into the operational improvements required. \n \nSTC – LEGAL ADVISORS – FEES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/94",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 94,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and) Human Resource —",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Education and) Human\nResource —\n\nWhether, in regard to the proposed phasing out of the Extended\nProgramme, he will state if consultations with stakeholders,\nincluding employees, are being held to identify equitable\nsolutions for those affected therewith, indicating the measures\nbeing envisaged to support the (a) employees of the National\nSocial Inclusion Foundation currently working thereunder and\nthe redeployment plan thereof, if any and (b) students currently\nenrolled under the said Programme?\n\nYZ OOO ZG\nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius: Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364\nEmail: clerk@govmu.org Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org\n\n--- PAGE 14 ---\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS PAGE 15 of 15",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/95",
      "sitting_id": "17-december-2024",
      "date": "2024-12-17",
      "year": 2024,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 95,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and) Consumer Protection —",
      "question": "(No. B/95) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the State \nTrading Corporation, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to \nthe list of legal advisors thereof, indicating in each case the remuneration drawn/fees paid \nthereto for the period December 2014 to November 2024.",
      "answer": "Reply: Information regarding the legal fees paid by the STC from 2014 to November \n2024, along with the details thereof, is being placed in the Library of the National Assembly.",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1) Mr R. S. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Special Purpose \nVehicles (SPVs), he will state the number thereof established since 2015 to 2024, indicating, \nin each case, the amount of accumulated debt incurred therefor as at date. \n\n17",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Ministry of Finance that, \non the basis of a survey carried out, 78 Special Purpose Vehicles have been set up over the \nperiod 2015 to 2024, and in that, it comprises 69 state-owned companies and 9 special funds, \nbut in all 78.  \nThe outstanding debt of these state-owned companies at the end of December 2024 \nstood at some Rs33.6 billion. Rs33.6 billion! It represents 4.8% of our GDP, Madam Speaker. \nThe list of the companies, including the special funds and their outstanding debt as at \nthe end of December 2024, is being tabled because it is a long list, and we don’t have all the \ninformation yet.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Beechook. \nMr Beechook: Does the hon. Prime Minister intend to come with a law or regulation \nthat would make all these SPVs accountable to Parliament? Because they have been \noperating in total opacity till date. \nThe Prime Minister: This is why I tell people… You know, some people are \nimpatient. We need to do all this. They will have to account for every penny that has been \nspent or stolen or whatever; it has to be accounted for.   \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d'Or. \nCOMMISSION ON PREROGATIVE OF MERCY – GRANT OF PARDON –\nBENEFICARIES - NAMES & OFFENCES – 2015-2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/2",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 2,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/2) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nCommission on the Prerogative of Mercy, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \nthe Commission for the period 2015 to 2024, information as to the number of persons granted \npardon, indicating, in each case, the name thereof and the offence in respect of which \nconviction was secured.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the Commission of \nPrerogative of Mercy has, for the period 2015 to 2024, received 7,109 petitions for grant of \npardon, out of which 4,599 have been acceded to. Information indicating the names of the \npersons granted pardon and the offence in respect of which conviction was secured is being \ncompiled and will be placed in the Library of the National Assembly. \n\n18 \n \nMadam Speaker, the House will appreciate and concede that the question covers a \nrelatively long period of time and implies compiling a list of thousands of names of convicted \npersons who, for the past 10 years, have applied to the Commission on the Prerogative of \nMercy and who have benefitted from its decisions. \nThe list, as I said, will be circulated when the exercise is completed, but some \nindications of cases of notorious reputation have already been flagged in the media, which \nhave provoked widespread criticism. Of these, the infamous case of one Chandra Prakashsing \nDip, found guilty in a case of fraud and sentenced to one year of imprisonment. Here, the \nCommission intervened to substitute the prison sentence with a fine of Rs100,000. \nThis was a case where the Commission delivered a decision whilst a stay order – stay \norder – of the judgement was in force against a convicted individual, that is, Mr Dip, who \nwas therefore under judicial control. It has never happened before; while the judiciary says \nhold on, the Commission on the Prerogative of Mercy decided that no, we do not have to wait \nfor the judiciary. And that convicted individual, as we know, happened to be the son of the \nformer Commissioner of Police, and it was easy for the public to draw its own conclusion and \nexpress the disgust of such an overt defiance of the judicial system. \nThis case was another scandalous legacy left by the previous regime. And we need to \nmake sure that this does not happen again. That is what we have to make sure of.  \nWe need now to retain two fundamental points from this state of affairs –  \n(i) \nThis was a clear case of violation of the principle of separation of powers, \nwhereby the powers of the judiciary have been outrageously usurped by the \nexecutive, by a clique in power. This is what happened here. You scratch my \nback; I will scratch your back. I will keep your secrets; you keep my secrets. \nThis is what happened.  \n(ii) \nThe Commission on the Prerogative of Mercy, through its conduct, was \nperceived by the public as blatantly lacking independence. Again, we had very \ngood people in the past, but this is what happened this time. It was perceived as \nyet another striking illustration of the decay of our public institutions under the \nprevious regime.  \n \nMadam Speaker, this episode showcases the harm which an irresponsible Executive \ncan cause to a country, going to the extent of perverting the course of justice to satiate the \ntotalitarian appetite of a petty dictator. \n\n19 \n \nMadam Speaker, we intend, and we will, revisit how the Commission is set up and how \nit should function to prevent a repeat of such a scandalous matter. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Third Member Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière. \nROAD ACCIDENTS – DRUG IMPAIRED DRIVING – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/3",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 3,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/3) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to road accidents, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to \nthe – \n(a) \nnumber of drivers involved in these accidents having been tested positive to drug \nfrom 01 January 2024 to date, indicating the number of fatal ones, and  \n(b)  measures being taken by the Police to deter the use of drugs by drivers.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister:  Madam Speaker, driving under the influence of drugs is a major \nconcern and contributes to road accidents resulting in fatalities; more and more, this is the \ncase. \nIn regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that \nfrom 01 January 2024 to 30 January 2025, 13 drivers involved in road accidents were tested \npositive to drugs. Two of these accidents were fatal.   \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Police that enquiries into the thirteen cases are \nongoing. \nAs for part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that \nseveral measures are being undertaken by the Police to deter the use of drugs by drivers, and \nsome of the measures are as follows – \na) \nfrom 01 January 2024 to 30 January 2025, 2,771 public campaigns focusing on \nthe dangers of both drink and drug driving have been carried out in malls, public \nplaces, traffic centres, and schools; \nb) \ndelivery of lectures to private companies on safe driving and behaviour on the \nroad; \nc) \npatrols are being carried out; they have been increased on a regular basis, and \n\n20 \n \nd) \n3,378 targeted operations were carried out during the period January 2024 to 30 \nJanuary 2025 in order to track road traffic offenders, including those who have \nconsumed drugs. \nFrom 01 January 2024 to 30 January 2025, 1,146 drivers have been booked for driving \nunder the influence of drugs or intoxicating substances. Over the last weekend, some 18,258 \nvehicle checks were conducted, out of which 3,900 contraventions were established and \n1,286 fixed penalties were issued. Furthermore, 54 drivers were tested positive for alcohol \nand 14 drivers tested positive for drug consumption. \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed that the Ministry of Land Transport is, in parallel, \nconducting sensitisation campaigns on the MBC TV, radio, and other media platforms, again \non the dangers of drink and drug consumption and driving. \nMadam Speaker, my Government is very much concerned about the overall damage \ncaused by drugs on individuals and the public at large, including road accidents involving \ndrug-impaired drivers.  \nWe are committed to ensuring the safety of all road users and will relentlessly fight \nagainst the scourge of drugs in our society. Government intends to have a thorough review of \nthe whole issue of road safety and the Penalty Point System. The Penalty Point System will \nbe reintroduced; it should never have been stopped. But we are going to look at it in a global \nmanner. In some places, there need not be cameras on motorways forcing drivers to suddenly \nbrake. All this will be looked at; we are having an expert to look at this. \nThis is what I had to say. I could also say that we are looking for people from outside to \ncome and have a look.  \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente, le Premier ministre peut-il indiquer à la Chambre, \nparmi ces 13 cas qu’il a mentionnés, combien sont liés à la consommation de cannabis, \ncombien à la consommation de drogue de synthèse et combien à la consommation de cocaïne, \nhéroïne ou autres types de drogues ? \nThe Prime Minister: The information I have does not detail which drug was used, but \nI can say that 13 were tested positive. \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente, une dernière question. Le Premier ministre est \ncertainement au courant des dégâts causés par les drogues de synthèse qui sont facilement \n\n21 \n \naccessibles aux jeunes dans les coins et recoins du pays. De ce fait, le gouvernement compte-\nt-il imposer des mesures pour que les chauffeurs de transports publics qui ont la vie de \nmilliers de Mauriciens entre leurs mains soient systématiquement soumis à des contrôles \navant de prendre la route ?    \nThe Prime Minister:  Yes, as I said, we are looking at it globally. All this will happen, \nbut may I remind the hon. Member that the previous regime, – look at what happened – drug \nerupted in schools; young children were taking drugs. This never happened before, but, \nanyway, whatever has happened, we are going to look at this. I should perhaps add that we \nare taking it so seriously that we are having a special agency, and I am appointing Mr Sam \nLauthan, who knows the issue very well. He will be like a czar for drugs! He will be in my \nOffice, but he will be the Chairperson of that national agency. \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. The hon. Third Member for \nPamplemousses and Triolet! \nSYNTHETHIC DRUGS PROLIFERATION – SURVEY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/4",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 4,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands – In regard to the proliferation of drugs in Mauritius, will he, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether any survey or study has been carried out in the past 5 years to evaluate the extent of damage caused by synthetic drugs over the island and, if so, indicate the outcome of the survey or study and, if not, indicate if consideration will be given for same to be done at the earliest?",
      "question": "(No. B/4) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands, in regard to the proliferation of drugs \nin Mauritius, will he, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether any \nsurvey or study has been carried out in the past 5 years to evaluate the extent of damage \ncaused by synthetic drugs over the island and, if so, indicate the outcome of the survey or \nstudy and, if not, indicate if consideration will be given for same to be done at the earliest.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the World Drug Report of 2023 warned of a \nproliferation of supply, demand, and use of synthetic drugs as well as an increase in substance \nuse disorders. As per the report, the number of people using drugs has increased by 11 \npercent globally and by as much as 40 percent in Africa in 2023. \nMadam Speaker, in response to the growing threats posed by synthetic drugs, the \nUnited States launched the Global Coalition to Address Synthetic Drugs Threats, aiming to \naccelerate international efforts to tackle this rising crisis. \nAs part of the Global Coalition initiative, the Government of the United States \nprovided funding to the UNODC to conduct a detailed assessment of the threats posed by \nsynthetic drugs. This project also evaluated national and regional capacities of six East \n\n22 \n \nAfrican countries, namely Kenya, Madagascar, Seychelles, Tanzania, Uganda, and Mauritius, \nwhich were included in that to implement key actions outlined in the UNODC Synthetic Drug \nStrategy. A validation workshop was held from 25 to 27 September 2024 in Nairobi. This \nreport, which has yet to be finalised, is expected to be released in March. \nAs part of the assessment, in July 2024, the UNODC conducted a study on synthetic \ndrugs specifically in Mauritius, and some of the main findings of the UNODC report are as \nfollows – \n\nAmong the six countries that I have named, Mauritius has been identified as the \nleading user of synthetic cannabinoids. Mauritius is the leading one! \n\nDrug rehabilitation efforts within the public sector remain severely limited. \n\nAlthough methadone treatment - this is what the report says - is available - I \nremind the House that methadone was introduced when I was Prime Minister. \nWhen the new government came in 2014, the Minister then decided that ‘no, \nmethadone is not important.’ I know an expert from Reunion Island expressed his \nviews on that; that it is a big mistake. Then, later on, they had to reintroduce the \nmethadone. Now, it says, although methadone treatment is available, other forms \nof treatment remain underdeveloped and inadequate. \n\nPsychological support and interventions, including traditional medicine where \navailable, need further strengthening. \n\nWith limited resources and insufficient follow-up strategies, many individuals \neither fail to complete inpatient treatment or relapse after finishing it. \nMadam Speaker, the threat posed by synthetic cannabinoids and other drugs in \nMauritius was already highlighted in the Global Organised Crime Index 2023, which \nmeasured 15 criminal markets, including drug markets across 193 member states. And in that \nreport, out of the 193, Mauritius was ranked at the 7th place with regard to the synthetic drug \nmarket behind South Africa in this area. \nHowever, in spite of Mauritius forming part of the US Global Coalition since \nNovember 2023, the previous Government allowed the situation to worsen. Nothing was \ndone as usual! It has failed to fully leverage the benefits and resources available through the \nCoalition to strengthen the country’s response. \n\n23 \n \nMadam Speaker, as stated in the Government Programme 2025-2029, which was just \nread by His Excellency The President, the fight against drug trafficking and use will be one of \nthe major priorities of this Government. Let me reiterate the actions that my Government \nintends to take to deal with this – \n\nAdditional resources will be provided to the Police. Not just resources, not just \nspending money; these people will have to be trained to know how to tackle the \nproblem, to increase their capacity to deal efficiently. \n\nBold measures will be adopted to end the suffering of families and society in \ngeneral. \n\nA Select Committee of the National Assembly will be appointed in the near \nfuture to look into the ways and means to address this problem of drugs. \n\nGovernment will develop and implement a comprehensive Action Plan for a \nmore efficient and effective response.  \n\nThe legal provisions in respect of trafficking, consumption and treatment of drug \naddicts will be reviewed to cater, inter alia, for differentiated treatment of \ntraffickers and consumers. \n\nGovernment, as I mentioned just now, will set up a National Drug Policy, \nMonitoring and Coordination Agency that will bring together various public \nbodies, all under one roof, to combat drug trafficking, provide rehabilitation and \nsupport families of victims of drug abuse, all under one roof. \nThis is why I mentioned Mr Sam Lauthan, a former Minister, to be the Chairperson of \nthis Agency.  \nWe will also ensure, Madam Speaker, that actions being taken to combat drugs are \naligned with the recommendations of the UNODC report.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister.  \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, can the hon. Prime Minister advise if the said study \nindicates if the problem of drugs is concentrated in certain regions of Mauritius or whether \nthis is eating our future as a whole? \nThe Prime Minister: From what I see so far, Madam Speaker, it is a national \nproblem – not just in one region, but a national problem. \n\n24 \n \nMadam Speaker: Yes, thank you. The hon. Fourth Member for Port Louis North and \nMontagne Longue! \nVIPSU POLICE OFFICERS – DEMOTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/5",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 5,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands – In regard to the Very Important Person Security Unit (VIPSU), will he, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to whether Police Officers formerly posted at the VIPSU have been subject to any demotion and, if so, state if consideration will be given for their reinstatement to their promotional ranks? PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS PAGE 3 of 19 Parliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "question": "(No. B/5) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands, in regard to \nthe Very Important Person Security Unit (VIPSU), will he, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to whether Police Officers formerly \nposted at the VIPSU have been subject to any demotion and, if so, state if consideration will \nbe given for their reinstatement to their promotional ranks.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Member for this question, as it \ngives me an opportunity to let the Police and the country at large see what kind of \nshenanigans the previous regime resorted to, thereby causing untold injustice and \ndemoralising the Police Force. \nThe Very Important Person Security Unit (VIPSU) is a specialised Unit, as you know. \nIn the context of filling vacancies in that Unit, officers are assigned higher duties, that is, to \nthe next rank above their current substantive capacity for a period of six months. Such \nofficers may be considered for promotion in the substantive capacity only after having \nsatisfactorily completed the six-months’ assignment. In the event they are transferred to other \nDivisions or Branches of the Mauritius Police Force during the six-months’ period, their \nassignment of duties lapses. \nNow, Madam Speaker, I wish to point out that in December 2014, shortly after the new \nGovernment came to power, 21 Police Officers posted to the Very Important Person Security \nUnit and who had been assigned higher duties were reverted to their former ranks \nimmediately! \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Police that from 10 November 2024 to 30 \nJanuary 2025, 47 Police Officers posted to that Unit and who were assigned higher duties on \n24 August 2024, that is, just prior to the election, were transferred to other Divisions and \nBranches of the Mauritius Police Force. As they were transferred before the completion of the \nsix-months period at that Unit, their assignment of higher duties had lapsed. \nBut I wish to inform the House and the hon. Member that since 2015, several officers \nattached to the Very Important Person Security Unit have benefitted from accelerated \n\n25 \n \npromotions, superseding other very deserving officers. Juniors were favoured over more \nexperienced and senior officers. It was a blatant injustice to members of the Police Force \nunder the previous regime – everything was politicised. There are some very able Police \nOfficers in the VIPSU. Not only did their juniors go over their head, but they were \ndowngraded - what they already received was being downgraded. And then, the juniors were \ngiven accelerated promotions! One, two, three, even four promotions during that period! \nThese injustices, Madam Speaker, will have to be addressed and corrected. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr A. Duval: Could you allow me two supplementaries on this? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, please! \nMr A. Duval: Firstly, Madam Speaker, is the hon. Prime Minister aware that there are \nPolice Officers reckoning 27 years of service as Sergeant, promoted to Inspector, in fact, were \nappointed to the Unit under his first tenure as Prime Minister? There are officers with 20 \nyears of service appointed on your second tenure as Prime Minister, again, Sergeant \npromoted to Inspector, they have been stripped off of their promotion the most unfairly a few \ndays after the Prime Minister took office. \nThe Prime Minister: I suppose the hon. Member does not know. I have just explained \nhow injustices were performed. Now, if a Police Officer, who has been appointed, gets \naccelerated promotion and becomes, in other words, a senior to somebody who was already a \nsenior and who has been downgraded, you have to correct the injustice; that is what \nhappened.  \nMr A. Duval: I am sure the Prime Minister will realise that 27 years as a Sergeant \npromoted to Inspector is not accelerated. \nMadam Speaker: This is not a question. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, the question is: the Prime Minister recalls the 21 \nVIPSUs being promoted in 2015. This is why the Prime Minister gave the assurance on 22 \nSeptember at Triolet in a meeting, on his own volition, giving the guarantee that no Police \nOfficers would be transferred and stripped of promotion, and that the same had happened to \nhim. He gave that word, and yet a few days later, after being elected, these poor Police \nOfficers have been stripped of their promotion. My question to the Prime Minister is whether, \n\n26 \n \nin considering his own word that has been given prior to the election, he will not remedy the \ninjustice that he has himself been aware of prior to that. \nThe Prime Minister: The hon. Member does not say it; not all the Police Officers who \nhave had promotions have been stripped off – not all. I have mentioned the figures here. But \nwhen we are looking at what has happened, we have to take corrective measures. And I am \ntelling you one thing: I will not stand for injustice in the Police Force. We have to correct the \ninjustices that have happened. It happened, unfortunately for them. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: One last one, yes. \nMr A. Duval: The hon. Prime Minister might, at least for those officers, again, those \nwho have not had fast-track promotion, those who have not jumped the head of their more \nsenior colleagues, if at least he could give consideration to those officers, restore their \npromotion. As I said, at least two cases of those appointed under you to the VIPSU have been \npromoted and stripped off recently; whether he will at least give consideration to cases that \nlook to be genuine. \nThe Prime Minister: I will give an example to the hon. Member. He keeps saying \nappointed under me. Do you know that one of the VIPSUs who was in the car behind me, \nwhom I promoted through the Police Disciplined Forces, was given that promotion to be \nbehind the Prime Minister? It is a great privilege. Do you know what he did? He is the one \nwho went and told the MSM leaders that the Police did not do a proper search in my home; \nthere is another safe. The Police came; through his declaration, he went to see the then \nCommissioner of Police and the former Prime Minister, and they came to my home. They \nhad already turned my home upside down everywhere; all the drawers had been thrown, and \neverything was upside down. They came again; I asked the policeman, ‘Why are you coming \nagain? You did this job two days ago.’ He said, ‘I cannot tell you, but I will tell you in a \nminute.’ He did not want to say in front of other people, and then he told me, ‘The guy who \nwas in your car, whom you had promoted, this is what he has done! Do you want me to just \nstay quiet and say, ‘Ok, jay de’. No, sir! This is gone! We will take action! We will take \naction! \n(Interruptions) \nI know who he is, but we will take action. We have to correct these injustices and these \ntraitors. \n\n27 \n \nThey had the duty to be with me, as at that time I was the former Prime Minister, and \nthis is what they did. And you think that I will just sit down and accept? No, I will not! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Inn anvi remet Dip! \nMadam Speaker: Your next question, please. \nPHONE TAPPING PRACTICE BY POLICE – DISABLING OF EQUIPMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/6",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 6,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands – In regard to phone tapping, will he, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to whether such a practice is being resorted to by the Police and, if so, indicate if consideration will be given for the disabling of any equipment used for tapping?",
      "question": "(No. B/6) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to phone tapping, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner \nof Police, information as to if such a practice is being resorted to by the Police and, if so, \nindicate if consideration will be given for the disabling of any equipment used for tapping.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I shall reply to \nParliamentary Questions B/6 and B/15 together as they relate to the same issue.  \nMadam Speaker, I thank the hon. Member again for giving me the opportunity of \ninforming the House of recent developments in connection with the very, very disturbing \npractices resorted to by the last Government to spy on our citizens; everyone. You will be \nshocked!  \nIn view of the importance of this matter, Madam Speaker, I crave your indulgence and \nthat of the House for taking a little bit more time to give a comprehensive reply.   \nMadam Speaker, the protection of the freedom of expression of any person is \nenshrined in Section 12 of our Constitution.  Let me quote Section 12(1) of the Constitution – \n“Except with his own consent no person shall be hindered in the enjoyment of his \nfreedom of expression, that is to say, freedom to hold opinions and to receive and \nimpart ideas and information without interference, and freedom from interference \nwith his correspondence”. \nIt is, therefore, crystal clear, Madam Speaker, that phone tapping constitutes a breach \nof our fundamental human rights and is particularly an intrusion of the right to privacy. \nNow, the whole nation was shocked – I am sure some Members of the Opposition too \nmight have been shocked – when it came to know, in October of last year through the \n“Moustass Leaks”, that private telephone conversations of individuals, key Government \n\n28 \n \nofficials, political opponents, and even members of the Judiciary, Diplomatic missions, were \nbeing listened to by the MSM Government. \nAs soon as I became Prime Minister, I considered that it was an urgent priority to \ninvestigate the nature and extent of surveillance, to investigate the techniques and activities \nemployed by the previous regime to spy on its own citizens, and to take swift action to render \nthem inoperable. I tell people; many people are impatient. We have a priority; this is a \npriority. I had to stop this phone bugging, the listening to people’s conversations. \nComme on dit, le chat ne boit pas du lait chaud deux fois ; cela m’est arrivé avant. \nSo, to be absolutely sure that this was being done, I invited international experts – real \nexperts – to carry out a thorough investigation together with senior members of the Police \nForce and the Commissioner of Police. \nI have to inform the House that the results of these preliminary investigations have \nbeen nothing short of shocking. \nTheir initial conclusions are as follows, and as I said, they are breathtaking to say the \nleast. I have not shared this with most people except the Deputy Prime Minister. \nThe MSM Government, believe it or not, Madam Speaker, did not only do phone \ntapping of certain high-profile Members of the Opposition or even, as I have said, of its own \nministers, even its own allies, including the PMSD. \n(Interruptions) \nThey were listening! \nWhat happened to you with the car accident, all these they have listened to; who said \nwho to tell you to do this, not to do that. All this! I can tell you.  \nThey even went further, Madam Speaker, and this is what is more shocking even! Even \nthat is shocking! But they conducted mass surveillance! Mass surveillance! They had \nmultiple sites – not one site, multiple sites – where this was being done.  \nWhat this means, Madam Speaker, is that the last Government put in place systems to \nmonitor and intercept calls and internet traffic in the country. This is what is called mass \ninterception. Let me quote what the experts said – \n“The system put in place is a highly sophisticated mass-monitoring tool for state \nsurveillance of the people of Mauritius.” \n\n29 \n \nIn other words, what I am saying, it is not just me, or the Deputy Prime Minister or \nMembers of the Opposition, but everyone, including allies, including Ministers, including \nmembers of the Judiciary!  \nThis means that every mobile phone conversation – I am putting stress on ‘every’ – \nevery landline call, every post on WhatsApp, Facebook, Signal, Tiktok, every e-mail – of \neveryone, I am saying, not just us, but everyone – was being monitored by the MSM \nGovernment. Do you realise what this means?  \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members: Shame! Shame! \nThe Prime Minister: It is a massive… \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members: Shame! Shame! \nThe Prime Minister: …massive monitoring. \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members: Shame! Shame! \nThe Prime Minister: Every piece of digital data communicated by a citizen to every \nsingle citizen in this country was diverted – everything you are saying was diverted – to these \nGovernment systems for storage and subsequent analysis and exploitation! And exploitation! \nWhen Judas came and approached the Leader of the PMSD, it is through this that they knew \nwhat was happening.  \nThe system had the capacity to intercept and store all communications on the island. \nAll! Not just some selected cases; all! Journalists as well!  \nAll this cost a lot of money and, of course, it was the public that was paying.  Not them, \nthe public! \n As our Nation was groaning and was suffering under financial strain on facing – each \none had a problem, in every household we know – the cost of living, what were they and their \nhenchmen engaged upon? Spying on all the Mauritians, all of them. All the people you see \n\n30 \n \nhere who have been on the phone, including you, Madam Speaker. Everyone! Even if you \nwere not in politics, you were being listened to. \nSo far for the cost, we have uncovered payments in connection with these systems. \nListen to this carefully. Do you know how much? Over USD 110 million for this system!  \nPeople are complaining about the cost of living. They are having difficulties to make \nend meets. Here, the Government, the previous regime spent – so far, I said, it is probably \ngoing to be more – USD 110 million on this.  \nA company based in Dubai – I will name it – Pertsol, was being paid to service the \nsystem, the equipment.  How much do you think? How much could servicing a system cost? I \nwill tell you: USD 7.5 million per year! How is that possible? How can you spend millions of \ndollars… \nMs Anquetil: La honte! \nAn hon. Member: La honte! \nMs Anquetil: La honte! \nThe Prime Minister: What it means is that some of that money went into the pockets \nof some people. That is what it means because it cannot cost that much. \nAn hon. Member: Bizin bour zot deor ankor! \nAn hon. Member: Mo kwar Melrose mem zot plas! \nThe Prime Minister: I am sure all the Members of this House, every Mauritian will \nfeel as I did when I learnt of this, a sense of revulsion and disgust at what the priorities of the \nprevious Government of the MSM and its Leader were. These were the priorities. And now \nthey are jumping, they think they will get elected again. \nAn hon. Member: Reve! Reve! \nThe Prime Minister: I should add, Madam Speaker, that when international experts \nwho, as I said, were accompanied by the Mauritius Police Force, sought to establish what \ninformation has been gathered, they found that the stations had been wiped clean. And when? \nWe know: as the results of the election were coming in, this is when they were cleaning \n\n31 \n \neverything. It shows to me that they thought they would win the elections. I do not know in \nwhat tower they were living, but when they realised that they are losing the elections, while \npeople started with their flags, very happy that we have been relieved of these maggots, here \nthey were cleaning their mess. They were wiping clean everything. \nBut let me give a word of warning, because this is being done in other places too. We \nare aware of what is happening at the State Bank, for example. We are aware of a few other \nplaces. Let me give a word of warning, Madam Speaker. The experts, they are real experts. \nWhatever you clean, they will be able to retrieve the information. They are able to; this is \nwhy I know, information that has been cleaned supposedly. We know now, we have them. We \nwill identify those who destroyed evidence. As the Attorney General and other lawyers know, \nit is a criminal offence and it carries heavy penalties. They think they would wipe out and we \nwould not know. I can assure the House, they will have to bear the consequences of their \ndeeds. They will feel the full force of the law, and we will see whether we have to strengthen \nthe law for these people. I agree, we will have to. In fact, by attempting to destroy evidence, \nthey are worsening their situations.  They have been warned. Take your responsibility! If you \nwant to go and destroy evidence, go and destroy if you want!  We will get the evidence. I am \npretty sure of that now. \nMadam Speaker, the task of sifting through the squalid rubble and debris left by this \nmafiosi regime, which was utterly devoid of moral scruples who ignored what the \nConstitution said, we will continue until the whole truth is known to the nation.  \nAs far as for the last part of the question, I can tell the House and the whole nation that \nI have asked an end to be put to the secret surveillance installed by these undemocratic and \nperverse groups which had practised a blatant state capture and confiscated our liberty. This \nwas what the election was about – liberty and unity.  \nThis should never be allowed to happen again. I can confirm what the experts said, and \nI quote – \n“All equipment have been catalogued, shut down and disconnected.” \nThe system is now disabled. Nobody is going to listen to what you say. I can assure \nyou. There will, under this Government, never, never be any restoration of mass interception \nor mass surveillance. Never! I can tell you! Both of us have been Prime Ministers. I am Prime \n\n32 \n \nMinister again; the Deputy Prime Minister has been Prime Minister. I can tell you; I was in \nthe Opposition; I became Prime Minister afterwards. Neither of us ever did these \nundemocratic deeds. We never spied on the opponents, neither him nor me, and we were not \ntogether at the time.  \nAs these experts describe it, what was being done – and this is also important – they \nwere using the most sophisticated technological equipment for eavesdropping, but they were \nalso making use of the cameras. We have said, you remember hon. Osman Mohamed said the \ncamera was pointing at his home, and Sir Anerood said, ‘well, close your window’. At \nDesforges Street, there were four cameras; only one exit, but four cameras. They were using \nthat and they were using the cameras to monitor. In other words, they knew not only what \nyou were saying on the phone, but also your movements. That also was being monitored. A \nmass-monitoring tool for state surveillance of every citizen in this country. This is what was \nhappening! \nMadam Speaker, this Government will not be deflected from seeking out the truth and \nbringing to justice, and making accountable to the law, those who are responsible for such \ndespicable acts. I can tell the House; I will update the House once I get further reports. I am \neven prepared to lay the report on the Table of this Assembly so that you can see with your \neyes what was happening to our country.  \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, time is already up, but in view of the importance of \nthe question, of course, I did not stop the Prime Minister; so, I will also allow one question. \nJust one! \nMr A. Duval: Just one? If you might allow two, because I have two Parliamentary \nQuestions. \nMadam Speaker: One! Just one! \nMr A. Duval: Well, I will put it all together then. The Prime Minister said on 20 \nJanuary that he has not received assurances that there might not be other systems in use right \nnow, and therefore, this is very serious. Not only what the Prime Minister has described as un \noutil de surveillance massif, officiellement installé, but it also appears that the own Prime \n\n33 \n \nMinister’s line has been taped and subsequently used. Is the Prime Minister not now of the \nopinion that perhaps the most important matter regarding privacy, regarding secrets of the \nMauritian State, safeguarding the secrets, given that he cannot say if those equipment are still \nbeing used, according to his interview on the 20th - my question is: doesn’t the hon. Prime \nMinister deem it fit to instate a Commission of Inquiry to shed the light on, first of all, who \nhas ordered for this system to be put in place… \n(Interruptions) \n… secondly, the funds that have been paid, and thirdly, who have kept copies of what? \nBecause from what we understand, the data has been deleted. And we must know! \nMadam Speaker: Question! Question! \nMr A. Duval: Yes, the question is… \nMadam Speaker: Not statement! Not statement! \nMr A. Duval: It appears that the data has not been kept in one place and that many \npersons, more than one, may still have that data because same has been leaked during the \ncampaign. Therefore, the question is: does he not see it as a matter of urgency to set up a \nCommission of Inquiry, which has already been set up by the previous Government? \nMadam Speaker: Do not repeat yourself! \nAn hon. Member: Mari long sa! \nMr A. Duval: And to urgently shed all the light on this whole saga which we should \nnot forget has put you in power! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: We were put in power… \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, let the hon. Prime Minister speak! \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, we were put in power because people in this \ncountry felt in their guts what was happening and they voted for liberty! That is what they \n\n34 \n \nvoted for: liberty and unity! Because the communal campaign went on as well, but nobody \ncared. Mauritians are Mauritians! Un peuple admirable comme on dit!  \nBut I answered the question that you asked. I have made sure international experts – \nprecisely what I said in January – this is precisely why I got international experts, real experts \nto look at the whole matter. I have even quoted what they said, that the system has been \ndisbanded. That is why I say it is a preliminary investigation. We cannot say at the moment \nwho has got what or what have they kept. We will know, unless they leave the country for \ngood. We will know. If they are here, we will know. \n \nThese people, you know, Madam Speaker, are like the scums of the earth. That is \nwhat we are dealing with. We ought to rub their face in the gutter where they belong! \n \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, time is up now for PMQT! \n(Interruptions) \nPlease, may I speak? I just want to… \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Deputy Prime Minister! \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Lot semenn li pou sanz plas la ! \nMr A. Duval: Met commission d’enquête la ! \nMadam Speaker: May I speak? \n(Interruptions) \nOtherwise, I will have to shout, which I do not want to do! \nUnder PMQT, PQs B/12 and B/16 have been withdrawn. \nNow, we proceed with questions addressed to hon. Ministers. Hon. Members, the Table \nhas been advised that PQ B/28 will be replied by the hon. Minister of Social Integration, \nSocial Security and National Solidarity and PQ B/65 will be replied by the hon. Minister of \nLocal Government.  \nI now call on the First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix! \n \n\n35 \n \nSADC – MAURITIUS’ SUSPENSION – FEES NON-PAYMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/7",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 7,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/7) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime Minister, \nMinister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the fire outbreak that \n\n126 \n \ndestroyed the office housing the Electoral Commission in Rodrigues on or about 30 October \n2024, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Office of the Electoral \nCommissioner, information as to the outcome of the – \n(i) \nPolice Forensic Investigation carried out, and  \n(ii) \nproperty damage assessment report, indicating the actions taken to recover \nlost data and documents pertaining to electors, and  \n(b) \nstate if consideration will be given for the construction of a new office.",
      "answer": "Reply: In regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of \nPolice that on 30 October 2024, a fire outbreak was reported in a building located in Port \nMathurin, administered by the Rodrigues Regional Assembly and housing the Sub-Office of \nthe Electoral Commissioner. \nAccording to information obtained from the Office of the Electoral Commissioner, the \nadministrative block, including the Sub-Office of the Electoral Commissioner, was \ncompletely destroyed by the fire. All the furniture, office equipment and documents, \nincluding forms containing details of all qualified electors in Rodrigues have been destroyed. \nPolice inquiry, in the matter, is ongoing. \nIn order to ensure the smooth running of the National Assembly Elections held on 10 \nNovember 2024, with the approval of the Island Chief Executive, the Sub-Office of the \nElectoral Commissioner was temporarily relocated to an office at the English Bay Youth \nCentre. As at date, the Sub-Office is operating therefrom. \nI am further informed by the Office of the Electoral Commissioner that the Office has \nembarked, since 24 January 2025, on a comprehensive House to House Inquiry exercise for \nthe island of Rodrigues, for the compilation of the Electoral Register for Constituency 21, \nincluding filling of a fresh elector’s card for each and every existing elector. \nAs for part (b) of the question, the decision to construct a new building at the site of the \nfire incident rests with the Rodrigues Regional Assembly. \n \nPOSTMORTEM EXAMINATIONS – YEARLY STATISTICS – COUNTER-\nEXPERTISE CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/8",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 8,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/8) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \n\n127 \n \nregard to Post Mortem Examination, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the – \n(a)  relative indications leading to the necessity thereof; \n(b)  number of Post Mortem Examination performed yearly over the past five years, \nand  \n(c)  number of requests for counter expertise over the past five years, indicating the \nnumber –  \n(i)  \nacceded to, and  \n(ii)  of such cases revealing different causes of death.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that whenever a case of death has \nbeen referred by a public hospital or reported to the Police, a postmortem examination is \ncarried out by the Police Medical Officer in accordance with Section 110 of the District and \nIntermediate Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act. \nThe reasons for carrying out a postmortem are to – \n(a) \ndetermine the cause and manner of death; \n(b) \nassist in investigations; \n(c) \ndetermine types of weapons used to commit offences and time of death; \n(d) \ncollect specimens like drugs and/or poisons for analysis; \n(e) \nexamine skeletal remains for identification purposes, and \n(f) \nprovide valuable insights that often go beyond the immediate circumstances \nsurrounding an individual’s death. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, from January 2020 to 30 January 2025, the number \nof postmortem examinations performed yearly over the past five years are as follows – \n \n   Year  \n \n \n \n \nNo. of Postmortem Examinations \n2020  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n1,202 \n2021  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n1,435 \n2022  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n1,458 \n2023  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n1,425 \n\n128 \n \n2024  \n \n \n \n \n \n \n1,541 \n2025 (as at 30 January 2025) \n \n \n \n141 \nWith regard to part (c) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat over the past five years, there have been three requests for counter-expertise. All these \nthree requests have been acceded to. In two cases, the counter-expertise has come up with the \nsame conclusion as to the cause of death certified by the Police Medical Officer. In the \nremaining one, the counter-expertise report has not yet been communicated to the Police. \nAs the House is aware, several cases of postmortem examinations that came to light \nrecently have raised serious doubts on the way such examinations are undertaken. I have in \nmind the case of the late Soopramanien Kistnen and that of late Jacquelin Steeve Juliette. The \njudicial enquiry held in the case of the death of Kistnen on 04 December 2020 has raised \nstrong doubts on the reliability of the postmortem carried out. Regarding the case of \nJacquelin Steeve Juliette, the population took cognisance with a sense of profound disgust, \nrevolt and horror of the conversation between the former Commissioner of Police and the \nChief Medical Officer casting further doubts on the credibility of postmortem examination. \nBoth cases are currently being reviewed. \nI intend to ask for assistance from international experts to throw light on these cases. \nI wish to inform the House that I have given strict instructions to the new \nCommissioner of Police that postmortem examinations should be carried out in strict \ncompliance with the protocol existing in countries like the UK.  \nRECRUITMENT EXERCISES – POST WRIT OF ELECTIONS 2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/9",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 9,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/9) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to \nrecruitments made after the issue of writ of elections in 2024, he will state the – \n(a) \nnumber of recruitments effected in each Ministry, parastatal body and other \npublic services; \n(b) \npolicy established in these circumstances, and  \n(c) \nestimated budget to be incurred for these recruitments. \n\n129",
      "answer": "Reply (The Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms): Clause 1.2 (c) \nof Article 1 to the Code of Conduct for National Assembly Elections 2024 stipulates that \n“holders of public office shall not exercise their office or utilise or allow public resources to \nbe utilised, in such a way as to become the subject of complaint for having been used to \nfurther or foster partisan purposes. They should discharge their public duties reasonably, \nfairly and impartially”. \nFollowing the dissolution of the National Assembly and issue of the writ of elections on \n04 October 2024, the attention of Supervising Officers of Ministries/ Departments and all \npublic entities operating under the aegis of the respective Ministries/Departments was drawn \nto the provisions of the Code of Conduct and the restrictions regarding the exercise of \ndelegated powers from the Public Service Commission, during pre-election period by way of \na Circular dated 08 October 2024 issued by the then Secretary to Cabinet and Head of the \nCivil Service. \nIn addition, these instructions were re-inforced through PSC Circular Notes No. 5 of \n2024 and No. 6 of 2024 issued on 08 October 2024 informing Responsible Officers of \nMinistries/Departments that – \n(i) \nthe PSC, in the context of the National Assembly Elections, decided that the \npowers delegated to them under section 89 of the Constitution for appointment in \nrespect of specific grades in their respective Ministries/Departments should not be \nexercised with effect from the date of the Circular, and \n(ii) \nfollowing the dissolution of the National Assembly, action should be stayed on \nthe issue of all Public Advertisements and/or Circular Notes in respect of filling \nof vacancies. \nI am informed that no recruitment exercise has been carried out after the issue of the \nwrit of elections on 04 October 2024 by the Public Service Commission, the Disciplined \nForces Service Commission and the Local Government Service Commission. \nI am also informed that following appointment exercise carried out prior to the issue of \nwrit of elections i.e from July 2024 to September 2024, 281 officers have joined the public \nsector after the issue of the writ of elections.  \nI am duty bound to point out to the House that, in effect, in a matter of days prior to 04 \nOctober 2024 i.e the date of issue of writ of elections, no less than 281 persons were issued \n\n130 \n \nletters to join the Public Service which took effect post 04 October 2024.  That is after the \nwrit of elections were issued. \nFurthermore, I am informed that there are 6 cases where offers of appointment were \nmade after the 04 October 2024 as follows – \n(i) \nMinistries/Departments – 4 \n(ii) \nParastatal Bodies – 2 \nI am to inform the House that the Attorney General’s Office is being consulted for \nadvice as to the way forward regarding these cases.  \nConcerning the budgetary expenditure involved, all the posts were funded in the Budget \nof the respective Ministries/Departments and other public entities concerned.  \nThe list of recruitment exercise which took effect after 04 October 2024 by grades and \norganisations involved is being placed in the Library of the National Assembly. \nRODRIGUES – COMMODITIES’ SHIPMENTS – DEMAND NEEDS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/10",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 10,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/10) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime Minister, \nMinister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to shipments of key commodities \nto and from Mauritius and Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information \nas to – \n(a) \nthe current state of the infrastructure and facilities available to handle the increase \nin shipment volumes;  \n(b) \nif a survey has been conducted to assess the economic impact of the frequency \nthereof on businesses and consumers in Rodrigues, and  \n(c) \nthe measures being implemented to improve the efficiency and timeliness thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Ministry of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy \nand Fisheries that the Mauritius Shipping Corporation Ltd operates two vessels for shipment \nfrom Mauritius to Rodrigues. The MV Mauritius Trochetia is a passenger-cum-cargo vessel \nwhile the MV Peros Banhos is used exclusively for transport of cargo.  The normal schedule \nis to operate three trips by the MV Peros Banhos to Rodrigues on a monthly basis, with an \nadditional trip by the MV Mauritius Trochetia as from this month, based on demand for travel \nto and from Rodrigues. \n\n131 \n \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Mauritius Ports Authority \nthat the port area of the Port Mathurin spans around 2.5 hectares, with a yard providing for \n295 containers. Additionally, there is an 875 square metre granary shed with a 600 tonnes \ncapacity for storage of food items such as bagged rice, flour, and sugar. \nFurthermore, I am informed by the Ministry of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue \nEconomy and Fisheries that the cargo capacity of the MV Peros Bahnos is sufficient to meet \nthe average demand of 250 containers per shipment to Rodrigues. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly that its Consumer Affairs Unit has gathered feedback from businesses in Rodrigues \nabout challenges in shipping goods from Mauritius, such as limited storage capacity and low \nship frequency, particularly during period of festivities. Accordingly, the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly is encouraging the private sector to enhance its warehousing and storage capacity. \nWith regard to part (c) of the question, as already informed, the Mauritius Shipping \nCorporation Ltd has planned an additional trip to Rodrigues through the MV Mauritius \nTrochetia, on a monthly basis, which will enable to also meet any additional demand for the \nshipment of commodities. \nMoreover, I am informed by the Ministry of Commerce and Consumer Protection that \ndiscussions are on-going with the State Trading Corporation with regard to the possibility of \nthe construction of storage facilities for MOGAS and Gasoil, especially following the recent \nshortage of certain commodities during the end of year festivities. \nI am informed by the Mauritius Ports Authority that it had, on 30 May 2023, enlisted \nthe services of a consultancy firm to review the Port Master Plan 2016.  On 07 October 2024, \nthe updated Port Master Plan was submitted to the Mauritius Ports Authority for \nconsideration. \nOne of the recommendations pertains to the development of a new 225-metre-long \ncommercial quay in Rodrigues for long-term port capacity expansion. The recommendations \ncontained in the plan will have to be studied in view of the financial implications. \nNEW ILLICIT SYNTHETIC DRUGS – FENTANYL, XYLAZINE & NITAZENE – \nREPORTED CASES & ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/11",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 11,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/11) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \n\n132 \n \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the increasing \nproliferation of new illicit synthetic drugs in the country, in particular, Fentanyl, Xylazine and \nNitazene, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, \ninformation as to the number of – \n(a)  reported cases of possession thereof from November 2024 as at date, and  \n(b)  persons found to be under the influence of these drugs, indicating the immediate \nactions taken/being envisaged in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Ministry of Health and Wellness that Fentanyl and \nXylazine are both listed in Schedule II of the Dangerous Drugs Act. Fentanyl is used mainly \nto treat patients with chronic severe pain, especially cancer patients or patients suffering from \nsevere pain following surgery, whereas Xylazine is used as a sedative, anaesthetic, muscle \nrelaxant, and analgesic for animals. \nBoth Fentanyl and Xylazine can be imported by pharmaceutical wholesalers after \ngetting import permits from the Pharmacy Department of the Ministry of Health and \nWellness. \nAs for Nitazenes, which are a novel class of synthetic opioids, they are not yet listed in \nthe Dangerous Drugs Act.  The Ministry of Health and Wellness has been requested to review \nthe Schedules to the Dangerous Drugs Act, to include Nitazenes. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat for the period November 2024 to 31 January 2025, one case suspected to be Nitazene \nwas reported to the Police by the Officer of the Customs and Anti-Narcotics Section of the \nMauritius Revenue Authority who secured a parcel at the Harbour Post Office on 16 January \n2025.  \nA sample of the substance has been sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory for \nexamination and a report from the Laboratory is awaited. The case is under enquiry. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat, for the period of November 2024 to 31 January 2025, there has been no reported case of \nperson found under the influence of Fentanyl and Xylazine. \nI have in my earlier reply to PQ B/4 expressed the commitment of my Government in \nthe fight against drug trafficking and use, as spelt out in the Presidential Address – \n\n133 \n \n1. \na Select Committee of the National Assembly will be appointed to address the \nscourge of drugs, and \n2. \na National Drug Policy Monitoring and Coordinating Agency will be set up under \nthe chairmanship of Mr Sam Lauthan – Adviser at Prime Minister ’s Office. \nSSR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – NEW AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER \nPROJECT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/12",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 12,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/12) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the New \nAir Traffic Control Tower Project at the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Civil Aviation Department, information \nas to the – \n(a)  current status of the project;  \n(b)  amount therefor disbursed so far, and  \n(c)  expected completion date of the project.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nSSR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – DEPARTURE & ARRIVAL COUNTERS – \nLONG QUEUES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/13",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 13,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/13) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the departure and the arrival counters of the Passport and Immigration at the Sir \nSeewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport, he will state if he has been made aware of \nlong queues at these counters and, if so, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nPassport and Immigration Office, information as to the urgent remedial measures being \nenvisaged to address same, indicating if consideration will be given for the introduction of a \nthird shift for the Police Officers posted thereat.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Officer-in-Charge of the Passport and Immigration Office \nthat long queues at immigration counters at SSRIA are normally caused by the following \nmain factors – \n\n134 \n \ni) \nduring peak times, there are simultaneous landing of several wide-body aircrafts \nat the SSR International Airport within a timeframe of 20-minutes, thereby \nputting significant pressure on immigration processing; \nii) \nthe efficient processing of large volumes of passengers has been slowed down \ndue to the aging server of the PIO, and \niii) \nshortage of staff leading to fewer immigration counters being operational.  \nI am further informed that several remedial measures have been put in place to ensure \nfast processing at immigration counters both during arrival and departure, namely – \ni) \nPolice Officers from the Head Office have been deployed to serve at the Airport; \nii) \nadditional Police Officers from the Head Office are assigned to the Airport during \npeak periods, and \niii) \n22 Retired Police Officers have been employed on a contract basis to assist at the \nHead Office and arrangements are being made to recruit additional Retired Police \nOfficers. \nDuring my previous mandates, I arranged for putting in place a system which ensured a \nsmooth flow of passengers both on departure and arrival. Whenever any problem arose, \nremedial action was taken promptly. \nI am informed that necessary actions have been taken by the Passport and Immigration \nOffice to have additional staff with a view to implementing a three-shift system at the Airport \nshortly. \nI am further informed that the Passport and Immigration Office is working on a new \nborder control management system with the possibility of integrating e-gates so as to improve \nservice delivery as well as to enhance the overall passenger experience.   \nThe whole issue is being looked into in a holistic manner with relevant stakeholders. \nCABINET DECISION 25 OCT. 2024 – ALLEGED MISUSE OF \nTELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE – COMMISSION OF INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/14",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 14,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/14) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \n\n135 \n \nregard to the Cabinet decision dated 25 October 2024 for arrangements being made for the \nsetting up of a Commission of Inquiry to inquire into and report on the alleged misuse of \ntelecommunications infrastructure and the recent publications and/or broadcast of alleged \ntelephone conversations on social media and other platforms, he will state where matters \nstand.",
      "answer": "Reply: The House will recall that in October 2024 during the electoral campaign, a \nseries of messages were broadcast on social media and elsewhere by “Mr Moustass”. These \nmessages include, inter alia, conversation between officials occupying important positions in \nGovernment, the legal profession and also the relatives of prominent politicians at the helm \nof power.  These messages clearly indicate the sinister forces at work to undermine the \nfunctioning of our institutions, and were clearly indicative of a government engaged in a \nbroader scheme of “State Capture”. \nMessages aired on social media and other online platforms were of a highly prejudicial \nnature, a threat to national unity and the security of the State.  One particularly nefarious \nmessage was so blasphemous that the head of the Catholic Church had to send a powerful \nmessage to the then Prime Minister for immediate action against the authors of the message. \nIn the light of the national outcry against the despicable purveyors of hatred, the former \nGovernment had, at its meeting held on 25 October 2024, agreed to set up, in accordance \nwith the provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, a Commission of Inquiry to inquire \ninto and report on a matter of public interest, namely, alleged misuse of telecommunications \ninfrastructure and publication and broadcast of alleged telephone conversations on social \nmedia and other platforms.  \nThe decision by the MSM government to set up a commission of inquiry, was hastily \ntaken once its secret had been discovered.  \nIt is obvious that it was a political ploy to attenuate the wrath of the nation when they \nheard these unbelievable conversations.  \nThe Commission of Inquiry announced by the then Prime Minister was never set up. It \nnever saw the day – even its terms of reference were never finalised. \nI can assure the hon. Member, my Government is conducting a thorough inquiry into \nthis issue. This Government will seek out the truth and those who have committed criminal \n\n136 \n \nacts or conspired with others – will have to bear the full force of the law. We need to make an \nexample of them and we have a mandate to do this. \nMy Government is conducting a thorough inquiry into this issue and my Government \nwill not be deflected. \nMOUSTASS LEAKS – PHONE TAPPING – SECURITY MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/15",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 15,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/15) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the “moustass leaks”, he will state the remedial actions being taken to secure the \nofficial telephone line – \n(a) \nat the Prime Minister’s Office, and  \n(b) \nof other high-ranking officials and diplomatic missions against phone tapping.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/6) \n \nDEPUTY PERMANENT SECRETARIES – 2023 RECRUITMENT EXERCISE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/16",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 16,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/16) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nrecruitment exercise for the post of Deputy Permanent Secretaries, advertised in 2023, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number of Deputy Permanent \nSecretaries recruited.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nCLOSEL, PHOENIX – EMIRATES AIRLINE SWIMMING POOL & SPORTS \nCOMPLEX AT – OWNER – PROJECT COST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/17",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 17,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade",
      "question": "(No. B/17) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade whether, in regard \nto the sanction imposed to suspend Mauritius from participating in activities as a member of \nthe Southern African Development Community (SADC) due to the successive non-payment \nof contribution fees to the SADC Mutual Defence Pact, he will state the – \n(a) \nreasons as to why payments were not effected as at date;  \n(b) \ntotal amount due, and  \n(c) \nsteps taken and/or being envisaged to remediate the situation.",
      "answer": "Mr Ramful: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that on 04 December 2024, \nthe Executive Secretary of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) informed \nme that Level 1 sanctions had been imposed against Mauritius for non-payment of the sum of \nUSD 11,056,083, which is equivalent to Rs508,667,161. Now, these sanctions entailed the \nsuspension of Mauritius’ right to speak and to receive documentation for all SADC meetings, \nincluding senior officials, ministerial, and Heads of States and government levels.  \nI further wish to inform the House that although Cabinet under the previous \ngovernment was informed on two occasions, Madam Speaker, in March 2024 and August \n2024, that Level 1 sanctions will be imposed on Mauritius if these payments are not made, \nand despite the fact that provisions had been made in the national budget for Financial Year \n2024-2025 to the tune of Rs640 m., no payment was made by the previous government. \nMadam Speaker, I have so far, unfortunately, received no plausible explanations as to \nwhy payment of the overdue contributions was not made by the previous government. I also \nwish to recall that I assumed duty as Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration, and \nInternational Trade on 22 November 2024 and could not even participate in the SADC \nCouncil of Ministers meeting held virtually on 09 December 2024 due to sanctions imposed \non Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that \nas of 29 January 2025, the total amount payable by Mauritius for both the SADC Mission in \nMozambique and the SADC Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) stood at \nUSD 18,259,439. \nThis amount, Madam Speaker, includes – \n\n36 \n \n1. a sum of USD 2,795,485 for the SADC Mission in Mozambique for the period \nbetween July 2023 and July 2024; \n2. a sum of USD 8,260,589 for the first mandate of the SADC Mission in DRC between \nDecember 2023 and December 2024, and  \n3. the sum of USD 7,203,365 for the extended mandate of SADC Mission in DRC, that \nis, for the period December 2024 to December 2025. \nWith regard to section (c) of the question, Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House \nthat on 30 January 2025, my Ministry transferred the budgeted sum of USD 11,056,083 to the \nSADC Secretariat in order to honour our financial commitment to SADC. I also wrote a letter \nto the Executive Secretary of the SADC Secretariat informing him of the payment and calling \nfor an immediate lifting of the sanctions. The SADC Secretariat has acknowledged receipt of \nthe said amount and informed that the sanctions have been lifted.  \nIt will be noted that a sum of USD 7,203,365 for the extended mandate of the SADC \nMission in DRC for the period December 2024 to December 2025 remains outstanding, and \nthis amount is due on 01 April 2025. \nMadam Speaker, I also wish to add that while the situation in Mozambique has \nstabilised and the SADC Mission in Mozambique has been dismantled, the security situation \nin eastern Democratic Republic of Congo remains volatile.  \nThe SADC Extraordinary Summit of the Heads of State and Government which was \nheld on 31 January 2025 in Harare, the Republic of Zimbabwe, where Mauritius could not \nonce again participate, took note with concern of the recent attacks by the M23 armed group \nand Rwanda Defence Force on the government forces of DRC, the SADC Mission in the \nDRC, and the civilian population in various areas of North Kivu. The summit expressed \nconcerns that the recent attacks continued to worsen the security and humanitarian situation \nin the DRC. Given the continued instability in the region, it is unlikely that the situation in \nthe DRC will stabilise in the short term. As such, it may not be sustainable for Mauritius to \nmaintain financial contributions to these peace-making missions. \nIn this context, Madam Speaker, Mauritius will engage with the SADC leadership, \nincluding the SADC Executive Secretary and the President of Zimbabwe, current SADC \nChairperson, on the margins of the upcoming African Union Summit in Addis Ababa, where a \ndelegation that will be led by the hon. Prime Minister will attend. These discussions will \n\n37 \n \nhighlight and reaffirm Mauritius’s unwavering commitment to regional solidarity and security \nand explore the possibility of securing a waiver for the remaining balance pertaining to the \nextended mandate of the SADC mission in the DRC. \nMauritius will also propose that future ad hoc contributions be made voluntary and urge \nSADC to explore alternative funding mechanisms such as the African Union Peace Fund to \nease the financial burden of Small Island States like Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to highlight that the payment of the contribution to the SADC \npeacekeeping missions was dealt with in a complacent and irresponsible manner by the \nprevious Government. As soon as the new Government was apprised of the situation, a \ndecision was taken to effect the payment as an utmost urgency to restore the credibility and \nprestige of Mauritius. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister! Hon. First Member for Port Louis North and \nMontagne Longue! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 4 – WATER SUPPLY ISSUES – REMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/18",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 18,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/18) Mrs A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to water supply \nin Constituency No. 4, Port Louis North and Montagne Longue, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to the – \n(a)  measures taken during the last 10 years to alleviate the water problem in the \nconstituency, and  \n(b)  reasons for the delay in the reinstatement of the roads following the excavation \nworks carried out by the Authority.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, the measures \ntaken during the last 10 years to alleviate the water problem in Constituency No. 4, Port \nLouis North and Montagne Longue are likely to take some time. The list is being compiled \nand will be tabled in the Library of the National Assembly. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, I regret to inform the House \nthat despite the amount of Rs700 m. spent by the Central Water Authority in its Pipe \nReplacement Programme and the reinstatement of some roads following the excavation \n\n38 \n \nworks carried out in 2024, avant mais aussi in 2024, in Constituency No. 4, Port Louis North \nand Montagne Longue has been delayed. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the Central Water Authority that there was a \nshortage of bitumen on the local market between June and September 2024. I am further \ninformed that bids for permanent road reinstatement in the Montagne Longue were launched \nby the Central Water Authority in August and September 2024, respectively. However, these \ntwo bidding exercises were cancelled due to non-responsive bids. \nSubsequently, another bid exercise for the north of the tune of Rs70 million was \nlaunched in October 2024 following an evaluation of bids that were found to be responsive \nand will be awarded shortly. \nMadam Speaker, for today, I am circulating a list of roads where pipe laying and \nreinstatement works have been carried out in Constituency No. 4, Port Louis North and \nMontagne Longue. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister! Yes, hon. Member! \nMrs Savabaddy: I am shocked, hon. Patrick Assirvaden about those millions. Donc, on \nse pose la question : kot tou sa bann milyon la finn ale pendant toutes ces dernières années. \nUne question par rapport à l’état de nos routes, je ne parle pas uniquement pour la \ncirconscription numéro quatre, mais pour les 20 circonscriptions à travers l’île par rapport à \nl’état de nos routes, les conditions, qui sont dans un piteux état… \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Member, I am sure the Minister will not be able to reply for \neverything. Your question was on your constituency. \nMrs Savabaddy: Okay, for my constituency. \nMadam Speaker: Of course. \nMrs Savabaddy: Alors, toutes les routes dans la circonscription sont dans un état \npiteux. Ma question est : ces contracteurs qui ont été contractés par l’ancien régime, est-ce \ndes vrais contracteurs ? Est-ce des professionnels ou des braconniers ? Est-ce que vous \ncomptez les garder en poste ? Merci. \nMr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, je comprends l’irritation de l’honorable \nmembre. \n\n39 \n \nAn hon. Member: Nou tou! \nMrs Savabaddy: C’est normal! \nMr Assirvaden: Je peux dire que les R 700 millions englouties par la CWA pendant des \nannées dans ce Pipe Replacement Programme où il n'y a ni queue ni tête, et je peux vous \nassurer, honorable membre, qu'en ce qui concerne ces R 700 millions que je qualifierai de « \ndévalisées » au nom du peuple mauricien, l’enquête est actuellement confiée à la Financial \nCrimes Commission pour savoir qu’est-ce qui s’est passé avec ces R 700 millions et surtout \navec ces tuyaux que vous voyez tout autour du pays, pas enfouis, mais tout autour du pays. \nL’ancien General Manager de la CWA et ceux responsables de ces R 700 millions vont \ndevoir répondre à la justice de ce pays. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \nMrs Savabaddy: Est-ce que le leader de l’opposition, ancien ministre des Utilités \npubliques, ainsi que l’ancien GM de la Central Water Authority, est-ce qu’ils pourront \nrépondre et dire ki finn fer ek tou sa pake kas la ek tou sa milyon la ? \nMr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, l’enquête nous dira ce qu’il faudra faire. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Nou pa pu ponn ! \nMr Lesjongard: Madam Speaker! \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Member, let me speak!  \nMr Lesjongard: Yes, please! \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Member, I will not tolerate this kind of attitude. I will not \ntolerate! You have to put your question, await an answer, and then put another question! \nThat’s it! Hon. Leader of the Opposition, you wanted to say something? It’s question time. \nMr Lesjongard: Yes, if she wants to blame the former Minister of Public Utilities, she \nhas to come with a motion in this House, and then we will debate. \nMadam Speaker: You opened the floodgates, you see? Now, let’s carry on. We have a \nfew minutes left for lunch. Maybe it is because of that that we are getting excited. \nOkay, the next person is, I think from memory, now you got me lost; I think B/19 is \nfrom Fourth Member for Rodrigues, yes! \n\n40 \n \nRODRIGUES – COMMODITIES’ SHORTAGE – SECOND VESSEL \nINTRODUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/19",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 19,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries – In regard to the shortages of certain commodities in Rodrigues due to the limited transportation capacity of vessel Peros Banhos, will he, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Shipping Corporation Ltd., information as to whether consideration will be given for the introduction of a second vessel on the Mauritius /Rodrigues route?",
      "question": "(No. B/19) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether in regard to the shortages \nof certain commodities in Rodrigues due to the limited transportation capacity of vessel Peros \nBanhos, will he, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Shipping Corporation \nLtd., information as to whether consideration will be given for the introduction of a second \nvessel on the Mauritius/Rodrigues route.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Mauritius Shipping Corporation \nLtd that as of February 2024, the MV Peros Banhos is being used to transport, on average, \n260 containers to Rodrigues per voyage. It has made 27 voyages to Rodrigues in 2024. The \nMV Trochetia effected six voyages in the same year and went for dry docking in Sri Lanka in \nSeptember 2024.  \nThe Mauritius Shipping Corporation Ltd also enlisted the services of MV Black Rhino, \nwhich made four voyages in the months of January and February 2024, that is, before the \narrival of MV Peros Banhos. Now, with a view to increasing the supply of commodities to \nRodrigues, I am informed by the Mauritius Shipping Corporation Ltd. that as from this \nmonth, one additional voyage by MV Mauritius Trochetia is being scheduled to Rodrigues \nmonthly along with three other voyages for MV Peros Banhos. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that MV Peros Banhos can carry an \naverage of 350 containers to Rodrigues. Since its arrival, the vessel has been utilised \neffectively to transport cargo to Rodrigues. However, due to the depth constraints at Port \nMathurin, it has only been able to carry, on average, 260 containers per voyage. The average \n350 containers can only be accommodated if the depth of the port is increased. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister! I will have a last question. I will call hon. \nThird Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle. \nNEW CLUNY SERVICE RESERVOIR & NOUVELLE FRANCE RESERVOIR – \nCONSTRUCTION & COST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/20",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 20,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/20) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the New Cluny \n\n41 \n \nService Reservoir and Nouvelle France Reservoir, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Central Water Authority, information as to – \n(a)  the dates of the construction and commissioning of the reservoirs, indicating in \neach case the costs incurred, and  \n(b)  if they are operational.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Central Water Authority that \nthe contract for a glass-fused steel reservoir at Nouvelle France was awarded to Pacific \nBuilders on 10 July 2023 for a sum of Rs48,412,738. Construction works started on 06 \nSeptember 2023. The reservoir was put into service on 17 September 2024. \nMadam Speaker, as for the Cluny Reservoir, I am informed by the Central Water \nAuthority that tenders for a Design and Build Project for the construction of one reinforced \nconcrete reservoir of 3,000 m3 at Cluny and one reinforced concrete reservoir of 2,000 m3 at \nRiche en Eau were launched in January 2021.  \nThe tenders for the construction of both reservoirs were awarded to Sotravic Ltd for a \ntotal sum of Rs74,713,000. I am further informed by the Central Water Authority that the \nconstruction of Cluny reservoir started on 05 October 2021, and the contractual completion \ndate was le 4 octobre 2022. The completion date was revised to April 2023, but the date of \ncompletion of works was 13 June 2023. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the Central Water Authority that defects were \nobserved in the reservoir when the CWA carried out its first drop test on 06 March 2023. The \ncontractor, that is, Sotravic Ltd, was thus requested to effect remedial works in accordance \nwith the condition of the contract. Same were completed in March 2023. The reservoir was \nput into operation in July 2023 and was inaugurated in August, le 17 août 2023 by the then \nPrime Minister. Handing over was done on 06 September 2023.  \nDuring a site visit by the officers of the CWA in July 2024, vertical dam patches were \nvisible on the reservoir’s wall. The contractor was again requested to effect remedial works. \nThe remedial works were undertaken by the contractor and specialist contractor, Tusk, from \n27 août 2024 to … August 2024. In September 2024, the contractor was informed that there \nwere still some patches visible on the reservoir’s wall despite the repair works carried out. \nThe contractor was again requested to remedy the defects. \n\n42 \n \nMadam Speaker, I effected a site visit at Cluny reservoir on 16 January 2025, \naccompanied by officers of my ministry and the CWA. I have noted the leakages visible on \nthe external wall surface of the reservoir at several places.  \nMadam Speaker, I have requested a full-fledged independent inquiry into the execution \nof this contract, particularly the quality of work and supervision of the contract. The inquiry \nteam will be required to situate responsibilities, and action will be taken as appropriate. \nDespite its intended purpose – et ça c’est important pour le peuple mauricien – and \nsubstantial investment involved, plus de R 74 millions, the reservoir remains non-operational \nat a time when the country is facing a severe water crisis. This failure not only highlights \npotential mismanagement and oversight lapses, but also raises serious questions about \nresponsibility and the effectiveness of decision-making in such a vital infrastructure project. \nAn urgent and transparent investigation is ongoing to determine the root causes, and \nhold those accountable for these critical shortcomings. Merci. \nMadam Speaker: Just one question!   \nMr Ramdass: In view of the significant amount of taxpayers’ money spent on the \nconstruction of these two reservoirs, which, I understand, are, regrettably, not operational, \nwill the Minister inform the House as to what corrective measures have been taken or will be \ntaken by his ministry to make sure that the water supply of those inhabitants is not \ninterrupted?  \nMr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, c’est clair que ce réservoir va devoir être \ndétruit. Il n’y a pas d’autre choix. 25 fissures sur ce réservoir qui n'a que 16 mois à peu près. \nAvec des millions et des millions investis justement pour répondre à ce que nous vivons \nactuellement, cette sécheresse. Une enquête est en cours pour situer les responsabilités. Le \ncontracteur va devoir assumer ses responsabilités, mais moi, ce que j’ai envie de voir, c'est \nque ceux qui sont responsables dans la Central Water Authority paient les conséquences de \nces décisions qui ont été prises dans le temps. Merci Madame. \nMadam Speaker: Now, it is time for me to break. We will break for one and a half \nhours and we will resume at 2.30 p.m.  \nAt 1.02 p.m. the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.33 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière. \n\n43 \n \nMAURITIUS JUDO FEDERATION - JUDO CLUBS - RECOGNITION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/21",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 21,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/21) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Mauritius Judo Federation, he will \n– \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to where matters stand as to \nthe request for the recognition of the 18 Judo Clubs by the Federation, and  \n(b)  state the actions taken by his Ministry to facilitate the affiliation process with the \nFederation following the meeting recently held with the representatives of the 18 \nJudo Clubs and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that upon assuming \noffice, one of the priority issues I addressed was the situation concerning the Judo Federation. \nTo this end, three meetings have been held with the President of the Federation. The first two \nmeetings were held in December 2024 and January 2025, which I personally chaired, \nfollowed by a third meeting involving officials from my Ministry. These discussions were \naimed at identifying a lasting resolution to the various challenges faced by judo clubs and \nathletes. \nWith respect to part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the House that in accordance \nwith the Sports Act 2016, a Sports Arbitration Tribunal has been established. This \nindependent body is empowered to adjudicate cases where individuals or entities feel \naggrieved by decisions made by the National Sports Federation, among others. I would like to \nreport that the tribunal has recently been reconstituted and has already commenced its \noperation. In this regard, the Mauritius Judo Federation has informed me that the judo clubs \ncontesting the Federation’s decision not to consider their affiliation have referred the matter \nto the tribunal. The Federation has assured my Ministry that it will fully comply with the \ntribunal’s decision once it is rendered. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I would like to apprise the House of the outcomes of \nthe three meetings held with the Mauritius Judo Federation. Following these meetings, the \nFederation has formally communicated the following to my Ministry – \nPending the tribunal’s adjudication on the admission of new clubs, arrangements \nhave been made under Section 3 (2) of the Sports Act 2016 to issue competition \n\n44 \n \nlicences to any judoka wishing to participate in events organise by the federation, \nand \nAccess to the national dojo for training purposes will be granted to all judokas \nprovided they adhere to the established code of discipline applicable to all athletes. \nThe federation has committed to fully abide by any decision reached by the Sports \nArbitration Tribunal. \nMadam Speaker, these measures demonstrate the Ministry’s commitment to ensuring \nfairness, inclusivity and the smooth function of sport governance in Mauritius. I am tabling a \ncopy of the letter addressed to me by the federation.  \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente, avec votre permission. \nMadam Speaker: Allez-y! \nMr Quirin: Cela fait six ans que cette situation au niveau du judo perdure, Madame la \nprésidente. Douze clubs qui ont vu leur renouvellement d’affiliation être rejeté et six \nnouveaux clubs dont la demande d’affiliation n’a pas été acceptée. Ce qui fait 18 clubs au \ntotal. \nMadame la présidente, le judo mauricien, jadis dominant dans la région, sur le \ncontinent, a très peu brillé ces dernières années. De ce fait, l’honorable ministre peut-il nous \ndire s’il compte organiser entre les deux parties concernées une table ronde afin qu’une fois \npour toutes, on mette de la bonne volonté et ne se fie pas uniquement au tribunal d’arbitrage \ndu sport pour régler ce problème ? Il faut bien le dire, le tribunal d’arbitrage du sport est au \ncourant de ce problème depuis 2022 et aucune solution n’a été trouvée jusqu’à présent. \nDonc, ma question est : est-ce que l’honorable ministre, au niveau de son ministère, \ncompte organiser une rencontre, parce que je crois que, là où on en est arrivé, Madame la \nprésidente, il faut de la bonne volonté – s’asseoir, discuter et trouver une solution à ce \nproblème qui n’a que trop duré. \nMr Nagalingum: We have already done that meeting, Madame la présidente. \nMr Quirin: Donc, si j’ai bien compris, dans sa réponse initiale, l’honorable ministre a \nparlé de trois réunions qu’il a eues avec le président de la fédération ; deux réunions avec le \nprésident de la fédération et une réunion avec les officiels. À aucun moment, il n’a parlé des \nréunions conjointes entre les dirigeants de la fédération et ceux qui contestent justement la \nsituation, ceux qui attendent que leur demande d’affiliation soit enfin acceptée. À aucun \n\n45 \n \nmoment, l’honorable ministre ne nous a parlé, ne nous a informés de cette rencontre que je \ncrois être salutaire pour le bien du judo. \nMr Nagalingum: I have just received, like I said, a letter from the Federation on 03 \nFebruary 2025, and a meeting is going to be held shortly. \nMr Quirin: Voilà, c’est différent, totalement différent de ce qu’il nous faisait croire.  \nDonc, Madame la présidente, si on fait référence justement au Sports Arbitration \nTribunal, depuis 2022, comme je l’ai dit, ce tribunal a ce cas à solutionner. De 2022 à ce jour, \ntrois ans, peut-on savoir…  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Et une élection! \nMr Quirin: Puis-je faire mon travail, Madame la présidente? \nMadam Speaker: Je vous écoute! Je vous écoute ! \nMr Quirin: Je n’aime pas être dérangé! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Bérenger, pa dérangé! \nMr Quirin: Encore moins par Bérenger! Alors, comme on peut le constater... \nMadam Speaker: Do not mind! \nMr Quirin: Bien sûr, je laisse braire ! Comme on peut le constater, beaucoup ont \nabandonné la pratique du judo, Madame la présidente, parce qu’ils n’ont pas la possibilité de \nparticiper aux compétitions localement et au niveau international. \nMadam Speaker: Si vous me permettez, si j’ai bien compris – peut-être que je n’ai pas \nbien entendu aussi à mon âge – mais si j’ai bien compris, il y aura une réunion, et peut-être \nsuite à cela, si ça ne va toujours pas, vous pouvez toujours venir avec une nouvelle question. \nMr Quirin: Il n’y a pas de souci. Je termine la question. Peut-on savoir, au niveau de \nvotre ministère, M. le ministre, quelles sont les raisons pour lesquelles ce Sports Arbitration \nTribunal, pendant trois ans, n’a pu trouver une solution à ce problème ? \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Let the Minister reply! \nMr Nagalingum: That was the past! Now, we are looking into the new Sports Tribunal. \nYou were with us when we discussed that. So, you know! \n\n46 \n \nMadam Speaker: No, do not get personal, hon. Minister! Do not get personal! Do not \ntalk to him about whether he was there or not! You are new to the... \nMr Nagalingum: That is right. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Nagalingum: That is right. \nMadam Speaker: That’s it! I think we can rest here. We can rest here. You will follow \nup!  \n Next question, hon. Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle! \nROUTES NO. 11 & 87 – IRREGULAR BUS SERVICE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/22",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 22,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/22) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the persistent irregular bus service \nalong Route No 87 (St Hubert – Curepipe) and Route No 11 (St Hubert – Mahebourg) and \nalong the south east coastal area, he will state the actions his Ministry envisages to remediate \nthe situation.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, since I have assumed office as Minister of \nLand Transport, I have had repeated complaints from residents of St Hubert from one Village \nCouncilor of that locality, Mr P.J., also known as Nitin, as well as from my colleagues from \nGrand Port, hon. Ms Babooram, hon. Mr Seeburn and the questioner, hon. Mr Ramdass, on \nthe irregular and unsatisfactory bus services being provided by individual bus operators along \nroute 87 and route 11, meaning St Hubert to Curepipe and St Hubert to Mahebourg, \nrespectively. \nAs the problem was persistent and occurring on a daily basis, I convened a meeting at \nmy Ministry on 23 January 2025, at which were present my three colleague MPs, the Village \nCouncilor and representatives from the National Land Transport Authority to consider the \nproblem. During the course of the meeting, Madam Speaker, some disturbing information \nwas provided on the bus releases as recorded on the stand regulator sheet and subsequently \ntampered with in the returns from the Bus Owners Cooperative Society of the South, on the \nbasis of which payments are effected to bus operators of Routes 87 and 11. \nThe stand regulator sheets for Routes 87 and 11 for the last week of December 2024 \nwere obtained together with the returns from the cooperative society. A scrutiny of both \ndocuments disclosed glaringly the existence of a collusion between the bus operators and the \n\n47 \n \ncooperative society to defraud disbursement of public funds under the free travel scheme and \nsubsidies on diesel. The comparative exercise carried out revealed that the cooperative \nsociety wittingly ignored the entries made on the stand regulator sheet where buses were \nabsent from operation during the whole days as well as where buses had performed a \nsignificantly lesser number of trips. In both instances, the cooperative society had recorded \nthe buses to be present in service throughout the month and credited these buses with a higher \nnumber of trips in spite of these buses being completely absent on some days. \nIn December 2024, the NLTA effected full payment for all operators of routes 87 and \n11 as per the returns of the cooperative society in spite of the fact that two buses were absent \nfor a total of three days out of seven days for which a thorough forensic exercise was carried \nout. Also, a full diesel subsidy was paid to all the bus operators. In light of the outcome of the \ncomparative analysis carried out, the NLTA had disbursed Rs9,405 in excess on free travel \nand Rs3,885 in excess of diesel subsidies. \nThese amounts, Madam Speaker, appear insignificant at first look, but I would like to \nstress the fact that the scrutiny of records focused on only two problematic buses over a \nperiod of seven days, out of which, three days the buses were absent, and for which claims \nwere fraudulently claimed and fully paid for. But then, there is a total of over 800 individual \nbus operators grouped within cooperative societies who have been operating under the same \npayment system for the last 20 years, that is, since the introduction of the free travel scheme \nand other financial support, such as the diesel subsidy. \nWhen this finding from the forensic exercise is brought to the national level, for 800 \nindividual bus operators on a scheme that cost taxpayers Rs 2.5 billion yearly, therefore tens \nof billions of rupees over 20 years, one can easily deduce that the amount defrauded could be \nin billions over the last twenty years! The more so, the number of complaints my Ministry \nreceives day in, day out. \nMadam Speaker, the Government and the travelling public are not deriving the full \nbenefits from this scheme, and hence, I would like to thank my colleagues MPs from \nConstituency No. 11, as well as the Village Councillor, Mr Nitin, for their precious help in \nbringing to light the malpractice outlined above. I would like to encourage my other \ncolleague MPs to report cases where they consider that public funds are being defrauded.  \n\n48 \n \nThe NLTA has been instructed to record a statement from the Village Councillor on the \ninaccuracies disclosed. This statement has been referred to the police for inquiry and eventual \nprosecution. I am tabling a copy of the statement with the permission of Mr Nitin.  \nAs for Routes 87 and 11, my Ministry intends to consider the invitation of applications \nfrom the public to replace the unscrupulous operators, and the provisions under Section 77D \nof the Road Traffic Act will be used to expedite their replacement. \nMadam Speaker, may I now seek your indulgence for a few more minutes to tell the \nHouse and the stakeholders the remedial measures which are part of the substantive question \nthat my Ministry is taking in respect of the systemic problems regarding the poor level of bus \ntransport service occurring around the island in order to have better control over the operation \nof buses and for enhancing accountability on the disbursement of public funds to bus \noperators while ensuring an improved level of service for the travelling public. \n(i) \nA fleet management system will be introduced requiring all buses mandatorily \nto be fitted with a GPS system linked to a control room which will be situated at \nthe NLTA. This system will provide real-time information on the number of \nbuses in operation as well as the number of trips performed. This system is \nexpected to come into operation during the course of this year itself if all goes \nas scheduled. \n(ii) \nThe Memorandum of Understanding relating to the payment of free travel \ncompensation signed between the NLTA and the bus operators will be reviewed \nsubject to Government approval from a daily-based payment to a trip-based one. \n(iii) \nSimilarly, the Fleet Management System will enable a more accurate \ncomputation of mileage incurred by each bus on a daily or monthly basis for \ndisbursement of fuel subsidies – diesel subsidies, in fact. \n(iv) \nThe road service licence of operators not providing services as per the \nconditions of their licences will be revoked, and as mentioned earlier, section \n77D of the Road Traffic Act will be used to have new players. \n(v) \nMy Ministry will arrange for strengthening the inspectorate staff of the NLTA, \nwhich is currently devoid of such officers, and to have Management Support \nOfficers pending a substantive recruitment exercise of the Inspectors. This \narrangement will allow for a higher NLTA presence along bus routes and at the \nstations. \n\n49 \n \n(vi) \nMy Ministry is also holding consultations with bus operators to acquire new \nbuses and avail of the incentive provided under the bus modernisation \nprogramme. \n(vii) \nWe will assist, as far as possible, to expedite the recruitment of foreign workers \nin the bus industry to meet labour shortages. \nMadam Speaker, to end, the situation in public transport has declined and is today \nsubject to a significant number of complaints that the satisfaction level in all segments of the \npopulation is quite low. I am of the view that this is the result of yet another failure of our \ninstitutions and a complete absence of bold policies during especially the past 10 years to \nmake the transport sector inclusive and attractive. \nTherefore, it is worth mentioning that with the collaboration of my colleague MPs and \nwith the Village Councillor, it has taken my Ministry only one meeting to detect and disclose \nmalpractices impacting negatively on the disbursement of funds for which institutions ought \nto have noticed and addressed, but did not do so. I am therefore taking bold measures to \nensure that the roles and the responsibilities of the NLTA are reinforced. \nLastly, I wish to reassure the House that my Ministry will ensure that notable \nimprovements are brought to the bus services throughout the island and that all sums of \nmoney spent on transport for the mobility of the population are effected with high \nresponsibility and accountability. It is indeed a daunting challenge, Madam Speaker, but I am \nfully prepared to take it head-on. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister! Yes, the hon. Fourth Member for \nRodrigues.  \nRODRIGUES – CATTLE PRODUCTIVITY INCENTIVE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/23",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 23,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/23) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to the Cattle \nProductivity Incentive Scheme, he will state – \n(a) \nthe number of applications received from Rodrigues breeders under the scheme as \nat date, and  \n(b) \nif consideration will be given for the increase in the budget allocated to meet the \nincreasing demands to benefit from the scheme.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, hon. Member. Madam Speaker, I am informed that \nthe Cattle Productivity Incentive Scheme was launched in Mauritius in the year 2013 with the \n\n50 \n \nobjective of providing a grant to breeders in order to assist them in taking better care of their \nanimals during the critical life period of a calf from day one to 3 months.  \nThe Cattle Productivity Incentive Scheme is managed by the Small Farmers Welfare \nFund and provides for a cash grant of Rs15,000 as an incentive to small registered breeders \nfor each calf that has reached the age of three months up to a maximum of 40 calves per year. \nNow, the overall objective is to increase cattle productivity and enhance food security. \nMadam Speaker, subsequently, in Financial Year 2023/2024, provision was made for \nthe Scheme to be extended to Rodrigues as well to enable the registered breeders in \nRodrigues to also benefit from the Scheme. \nNow, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Small Farmers \nWelfare Fund that an amount of Rs1 m. was budgeted in the Financial Year 2023/2024 for \nRodrigues, and 76 applications were received from breeders in respect of 138 calves for a \ntotal amount of Rs2,070,000. Out of the total of 76 applications, payment of Rs150,000 for \n10 calves was made to 3 applicants in the Financial Year 2023/2024 while payment of an \namount of Rs1,920,000 will be effected to 73 applicants in the financial year. Rs1 m. has \nbeen budgeted by the Rodrigues Regional Assembly in this financial year, and the remaining \namount, Rs920,000 will be paid by the Small Farmers Welfare Fund. \nNow, as regards part (b) of the question, I wish to highlight that in accordance with the \ndecision of the Ministry of Finance, the Scheme in respect of Rodrigues for Financial Year \n2024/2025 is being implemented by the Rodrigues Regional Assembly. I am also informed \nthat the Scheme is operated on a demand basis and additional funds can be reallocated by the \nRodrigues Regional Assembly from other schemes to meet the increasing demands. \nAccording to the Rodrigues Regional Assembly, as of now, no application under the \nScheme has been received, and there has been no disbursement of funds in this financial year. \nMadam Speaker: Go ahead, thank you. Yes, hon. First Member for Port Louis \nMaritime & Port Louis East. \nNSLD – ARSENAL HOUSING PROJECT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/24",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 24,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/24) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port Louis Maritime & Port Louis \nEast) asked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the housing project at \nArsenal, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the New Social Living \nDevelopment Ltd., information as to – \n(a) \nthe total cost of the project, indicating the amount of Value Added Tax exemption \nbenefited on the purchase of construction materials; \n(b) \nthe number of units constructed to date; \n\n51 \n \n(c) \nthe name of the architect therefor, and \n(d) \nif all necessary permits from local authorities were obtained prior to the \nconstruction of the housing units.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Member for his question, and my \nanswer is as follows. I am informed by the New Social Living Development Ltd (NSLD) that \nthe project at Arsenal consists of the construction of a total of 574 housing units on two sites, \nthat is, 284 units on one site opposite Arsenal Government School and 290 units on another \nsite opposite La Pépinière d’Arsenal. \nWith regard to part (a), I am informed by the NSLD that the total cost of the project is \napproximately Rs1.92 billion. According to information provided by the Ministry of Finance, \nthe contractor has benefitted from exemption of VAT as other contractors have also done \nunder this particular social housing project. In this particular case, it was Rs54 million for the \nproject at Arsenal. \nAs regards part (b), I am again informed by the NSLD that works on both sites are \ncurrently ongoing and the building works of the 574 housing units only are expected to be \ncompleted by September 2025.  \nMadam Speaker, in regard to part (c), the architectural firm for the project at Arsenal is \nNK Architect Ltd.  \nInsofar as part (d) is concerned, I am informed that the Building and Land Use Permit \nin respect of both sites was first obtained on 04 August 2023, and my understanding is that a \nBLUP is only issued by a local authority after all required clearances have been obtained. I \nwould like to add, however, that there was an amendment in the application for an amended \nBLUP on both sites, and I am informed that they date to 11 October 2024. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, alright. The hon. Second Member for Rodrigues, hon. François. \nWe are glad that you made it! \nMr François: Thank you very much, Madam Speaker. \nRODRIGUES – OFF-LAGOON FISHING SCHEME – CANOTTE PURCHASE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-march-2025",
        "wednesday-18-june-2025",
        "tuesday-04-february-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/25",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 25,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/25) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to support \n\n52 \n \nextended to fishers in Rodrigues through the off-lagoon fishing scheme for the purchase of \nCanotte and outboard engine, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nDevelopment Bank of Mauritius Ltd., information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of applications – \n(i) \nreceived, and  \n(ii) \napproved, indicating the amount disbursed in each case; \n(b) \ntime taken for the processing of applications, and  \n(c) \nremedial measures being envisaged, if any, on the expiry of fisher’s quotation for \noutboard engine as a result of the long processing delay.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, the off-lagoon fishing scheme, purchase of Canotte was \nintroduced with the aim of providing financial support to registered artisanal fishers to enable \nthem to purchase better equipped fishing boats of 7 to 12 metres, commonly known as \nCanotte for fishing in the outer reef in order to enhance the livelihood of the artisanal fishers \nwhile altogether increasing local fish production. \nThe scheme provides for the following – \n(a) \nA grant representing 50% of the cost of the boat and other related costs, including \nnavigation and fishing accessories, up to a maximum of Rs300,000. \n(b) \nA loan from DBM representing 90% of the remaining cost of the project at an \ninterest rate of 3% per annum and a repayment period of 7 years, including a one-\nyear moratorium. \n(c) \nThe beneficiary meeting 10% of the remaining cost from his own fund. \nIn this context, my Ministry has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the \nDevelopment Bank of Mauritius Ltd for the implementation of the scheme. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that the scheme was available for Mauritian fishers, \nand it is only recently, that is, as of July 2023, that the scheme was extended to fishers from \nRodrigues. \nAs regards part (i) of the question, my Ministry received from the Commission for \nAgriculture, Fisheries, Food Production, Forestry, Plant and Animal Quarantine of the \nRodrigues Regional Assembly 22 applications from fishers in Rodrigues. These applications \nwere subsequently submitted to the DBM on 31 August 2023 for financial assessment at this \nend.  \n\n53 \n \nRegarding part (ii) of the question, I am informed by the Chief Executive of the DBM \nthat on 3 October 2023, 19 out of the 22 applications were approved. \nMadam Speaker, the House may wish to note that in January 2024, a total grant of \nRs4,219,740 was disbursed in favour of the 19 eligible fishers from Rodrigues. As regards the \nbreakdown of the total grant amount disbursed in respect of each of the 19 beneficiaries, I am \ntabling the information. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nMr François: Just one supplementary, Madam Speaker. Is the hon. Minister aware that \nout of the 19 applications received or approved, only three or four canottes have been \npurchased, and some of the fishers – probably out of the Rs4 million you mentioned – have \nreceived part payment for the construction of their canottes for a construction period of only \nthree months, which has already lapsed? Why did it lapse? Because local marine contractors \ncould not respond positively with all the problems of shortages of raw materials and \nincreasing cost of materials. So, will the hon. Minister request a review or an extension of \nthis construction period with DBM and the local authorities thereat in the interest of our \nfishers? \nDr. Boolell: Thank you very much hon. Member. Since you are acting in the interest of \nthe fishermen and we all agree, we have no choice but to impress upon DBM to do the \nneedful. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, the hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre \nBornes! \nQUATRE BORNES MARKET –TRAFFIC LIGHTS MAINTENANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/26",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 26,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/26) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the traffic lights opposite the Quatre \nBornes market which are not operational since several months, he will state when same will \nbe repaired for the safety of the road users.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Traffic Management \nand Road Safety Unit of my Ministry that the traffic lights opposite the Quatre Bornes market \nare currently operational for vehicular traffic, while for pedestrians, these traffic lights are not \npresently operational. \n\n54 \n \nIn fact, the cables connecting the pelican heads and pedestrian lights along Victoria \nAvenue B72 road, in reference to the controller box, have been found to be faulty. Due to \nfaulty cables, erratic timing and complete power outages of the whole set of traffic light \nsignals have been observed. As such, only the pelican heads along Victoria Avenue, meaning \nB72, have been disconnected to ensure the operational characteristics of the traffic lights on \nthe other legs for vehicular traffic. \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed that the underground sleeve harbouring the cables \nis completely jammed. As a result, civil works, meaning excavation of the road and putting in \nnew trunks and cables, will have to be undertaken to change the sleeve and the cables. This \nintervention does not fall under the contract for maintenance of traffic lights. At this moment \nin time, no contract for civil works can be awarded under the framework agreement because \nsame has expired and new tenders will have to be launched. This might take some time. \nHowever, the repairs of these traffic signals will be given priority and consideration in view \nof their strategic location. Meanwhile, the TRMSU has written to the Commissioner of Police \nto ensure safe pedestrian crossing at the location. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister. Yes.  \nMs Anquetil: I have three supplementary questions. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, one at a time. \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie... \nMadam Speaker: One at a time! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Would the Minister inform the \nHouse when was the last maintenance or inspection conducted on these traffic lights, and \nwhat were the findings? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Like I said, the problem is underground, Madam Speaker, \nbecause the cables are faulty. That is why there is an erratic light signal on the pelican heads. \nIt is not due to bad maintenance. It is because of the cables. I asked the Traffic Management \nand Road Safety Unit that since the trunks are already there, why don’t they slot in new \ncables? But the problem is, over the years, 20 years or so, it has been jammed with mud and \nall these things, and it has not been possible. So, it is not a question of maintenance. It is a \nquestion of faulty cables. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \n\n55 \n \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. In the Estimates of 2024-2025, \na sum of Rs25 million has been allocated for the maintenance of the traffic lights. Can the \nMinister provide a detailed breakdown of how this amount has been spent so far? Thank you. \nMr Osman Mahomed: If I knew... \nMadam Speaker: It is a very tall order. \nMr Osman Mahomed: It is indeed, and, you know, I have been Minister for two \nmonths. Previously, hon. Ganoo was there. I do not know how he spent that money, but we \nwill have to... \nMadam Speaker: You will find out! \nMr Osman Mahomed: I will find out and get back to the hon. Member. \nMs Anquetil: Last one for the Minister. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nMs Anquetil: Thank you very much, hon. Minister. Madame la présidente, le \ndysfonctionnement de ces feux de signalisation représente un grave danger, d’accord ? Dans \nnotre circonscription et surtout vis-à-vis du marché de Quatre Bornes. En attendant leur \nréparation, le ministre pourrait-il indiquer quelles mesures urgentes peuvent être prises pour \nassurer la sécurité des piétons ? Je vous remercie. Madame la présidente. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I have replied to this. I have said that the \nTMRSU has written to the Commissioner of Police to ensure safe pedestrian crossing at that \nlocation. So, if there is none... \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: I cannot hear the answer, please! \nMr Osman Mahomed: ...if there is none, I will have to speak to the Commissioner of \nPolice – if that is allowed of course – to ensure that needful is being done there because we \nhave written formally and I am quite surprised that no Police officers are there. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Will that do? Yes, alright. As long as everything is secure. Hon. \nThird Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle! \n\n56 \n \nJAWAHARLALL NEHRU HOSPITAL – ANGIOGRAPHY TEST MACHINE – \nCORONARY TREATMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/27",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 27,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/27) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to coronary angiography \ntreatment, he will state if he has been made aware of the difficulties faced by inhabitants of \nthe southern part of the island in terms of waiting time for treatment and, if so, indicate if – \n(a) \nthe Jawaharlall Nehru Hospital is equipped with an angiography test machine, \nand  \n(b) \nsame is operational.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, complaints have been received regarding the long \nwaiting time faced by the inhabitants of the southern regions before undergoing coronary \nangiography and angioplasty. This is due to the fact that the Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital has \nnot been equipped with an angiography machine. Accordingly, patients requiring routine and \nemergency coronary angiography and angioplasty had to be referred to the Trust Fund for \nSpecialised Medical Care for treatment. \nMadam Speaker, as at 31 December 2024, there were 121 patients on the waiting list at \nJawaharlall Nehru Hospital. Since July 2023, an angiography machine had been transferred \nfrom Cardiac Centre Trust Fund for Specialised Medical Care to Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital, \nbut the equipment has been non-functional. However, I have to highlight that electrical \nworks, including air conditioning, have been contracted out and will be completed by 16 \nFebruary 2025. Additionally, the CAT-lab comprising five cardiologists, trained nursing staff \nand 18 ICU beds has also been set up there. \nMadam Speaker, the preinstallation works for the angiography machine are almost \ncompleted at Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital and the machine will be operational around mid-\nFebruary 2025, thus alleviating the plight of the inhabitants of the region. Nonetheless, being \na second-hand machine, the angiography equipment has to be tested to assess its \nfunctionality. In the same vein, my Ministry is exploring the possibility of acquiring new \nangiography equipment in the future. \n\n57 \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. PQ B/28 will be replied by the hon. Minister of Social \nIntegration.  \nSo, hon. First Member for Rodrigues, Ms Collet! \nRODRIGUES – FATAL ROAD ACCIDENTS – FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE \nMECHANISM",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/28",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 28,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/28) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nNational Infrastructure whether, in regard to fatal roads accidents in Rodrigues, he will state \nthe assistance, if any, extended to the families of the victims thereof, indicating the number of \nclaims received and processed as at 15 January 2025.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity (Mr A. Subron): Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that my Ministry provides financial \nassistance under the National Solidarity Fund to bereaved families residing in Mauritius in \nrespect of death cases, including victims of fatal road accidents.  \nWith regard to Rodrigues, I am informed by the Rodrigues Regional Assembly that \nthey do not have any similar mechanism in place for providing financial assistance to families \nof victims of fatal road accidents thereat, nor have they made any application so far to my \nMinistry to that effect.  \nIn view of ensuring fairness to all citizens of the Republic residing in Rodrigues, my \nMinistry is proposing to assist the Rodrigues Regional Assembly in setting up a similar \nmechanism so as to provide financial support to families of victims of fatal road accidents in \nRodrigues for timely relief. \nI am tabling to this House a list of assistance under the National Solidarity Fund, the \nNational Pensions Act and the Social Aid Act to bereaved families in respect of death cases, \nincluding victims of fatal road accidents in Mauritius. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister. The hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \n \n \n\n58 \n \nSOCIAL REGISTER OF MAURITIUS – PROXY MEAN TEST – ELIGIBILITY \nCRITERIA REVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/29",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 29,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/29) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nSocial Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity whether, in regard to the Proxy \nMean Test used to determine eligibility to fall under the Social Register of Mauritius, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether any remedial action or review \nis being envisaged with regard to the eligibility criteria following the shortcomings identified \nin the system for the allocation of subsistence allowance and other services to potential \nbeneficiaries.",
      "answer": "Mr Subron: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the Social Register of Mauritius \n(SRM) was introduced in 2008 as a centralised database to register individuals requesting \nfinancial support. Eligibility for assistance is based on two criteria – \n(i) \nincome, and  \n(ii) \na Proxy Means Test (PMT), which is a formula used to determine the eligibility \nof an individual or a household to benefit from empowerment support. \nThe Proxy Means Test (PMT) formula aims at addressing the living standard of each \nhousehold and is based on demographic and socio-economic characteristics, such as age, \ngender, and number of children, as well as whether the applicant is the owner of his or her \ndwelling and the housing conditions thereof. \nThe existing criteria in use for the PMT dates back to 2016. In view of the changing \nsocio-economic conditions, the PMT criteria, which still makes use of data from the \nHousehold Budget Survey 2012, need to be reviewed to take on board new criteria to be \nworked out. In addition, after nine years, observations have been made of elements of \nsubjectivity when applying some of the criteria of the PMT. \nThe previous government has, in June 2023, initiated action to review the PMT. \nMaurice Stratégie (MS), which currently falls under the purview of the Ministry of Financial \nServices and Economic Planning, was solicited to assist with the review and is providing the \nservices of a local and an international consultant for the review thereof with the financial \nsupport of Agence française de développement (AFD) and Expertise France. However, the \n\n59 \n \nreview of the PMT is also largely dependent on the findings of the latest Household Budget \nSurvey 2023, which is expected to be finalised by February 2025 according to Statistics \nMauritius.  \nFurthermore, the Board of the National Empowerment Foundation (NEF) is presently \nbeing reconstituted after an expression of interest for which 269 applications were received \nby 27 January 2025. Once the NEF Board is reconstituted, my Ministry will decide on the \nfollow-up mission by the consulted plan in March 2025 to finalise the PMT review or any \nother alternative process necessary to review the outdated PMT.  \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Ms Collet, First Member for Rodrigues! \nEDUCATION SYSTEM – CURRICULUM, DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION & \nEQUITY – PROPOSED REFORMS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/30",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 30,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/30) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nEducation and Human Resource whether, in regard to the education system, he will state the \nreforms being proposed for the transformation of the current educational system, indicating if \nthis process will address issues pertaining to curriculum, digital transformation and equity in \nquality education and, if so, give details thereof.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, I wish to thank the hon. First Member of \nRodrigues for a question which is as vast and broad as education can be. The concerns \nregarding the proposed reforms and issues pertaining to curriculum and digital transformation \nand equity are legitimate. I wish to assure the hon. Member that this Government is fully \ncommitted to revamping and reconstructing our education system on the basis of equity.  \nAs mentioned in the Government Programme 2025-2029, this Government will ensure \nthat the reforms of our education system cover the widest possible number of issues \nhampering the development of our students while addressing emerging challenges in a \nconstantly evolving sector.  \nToday, this Government has the dual task of quickly cleaning the massive pedagogical \nmess left by the previous regime and coming forward with a set of innovative measures to \naddress the myriad emerging challenges facing the education sector. After what we have \n\n60 \n \nexperienced over the past 10 years under the previous regime, where our children were \nmartyred by an oppressive pedagogy that mercilessly excluded thousands of students of the \nRepublic, now is the time to redress the situation.  \nThis Government believes that each child of the Republic, regardless of their \nbackground or ability, has the right to receive an equitable and quality education. Equity in \neducation involves the transformation of all physical and learning aspects of the school, such \nas curriculum, pedagogy, learning strategies, assessment and teacher training, and creates an \neducation system that responds to the needs of all children in a healthy and conducive \nlearning environment adapted to the intellectual, social, physical, artistic, cultural and \neconomic needs. \nThe previous Government did not realise that our schools have to cater for all the \nchildren of the Republic. We have to cater for the aspirations of the high flyers and nurture \ntheir quest for excellence, and at the same time, we should not neglect the average and slow \nlearners. Different students learn in different ways and at different paces. We cannot have a \none-size-fits-all pathway for all our children. This Government cares for all the children of \nthe Republic. The new educational policy orientations of my Ministry have been very aptly \narticulated in the Government Programme 2025-2029. Unlike the previous Government \nwhich imposed policies and which obstinately refused to entertain meaningful dialogues with \npartners in the educational sector, we believe in listening to stakeholders. Since holding \noffice, this is what I have been relentlessly doing. A blueprint will be prepared after the Assise \nde l’Éducation which will be held in April 2025. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the hon. Member that my Ministry sent a delegation \nto Rodrigues during mid-January for a sensitisation campaign on the implementation of the \nnew foundational programme which has replaced the obnoxious Extended Programme which \nunfortunately massacred the future of thousands of our students who left the system neither \nwith a PSAC nor with an NCE Certificate. Another team from my Ministry is proceeding to \nRodrigues soon for the implementation of the Google Classroom Digitisation Project. We \nbelieve that digital transformation encourages a shift from teacher-centred instruction to \nstudent-driven learning. \nMadam Speaker, curriculum development, digital transformation and equity are \ninterdependent factors that shape the future of quality education. While digital technologies \noffer immense potential to enhance learning experiences, they also present challenges related \n\n61 \n \nto accessibility and fairness. A forward-thinking curriculum must integrate digital tools, \npromote competency and value-based learning and ensure that every child, regardless of their \nbackground, can benefit from technological advancements. Only by addressing these \nchallenges can our education system fully harness the power of curriculum and digital \ntransformation while ensuring quality education and equity in education. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister! Yes! \nMs Collet: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Will the hon. Minister indicate whether there \nwill be consideration for some civic education to be included in the curriculum for our \nchildren at all levels, including the secondary level in Rodrigues? \nDr. Gungapersad: Thank you for that supplementary question. Without civic education \nfully embedded in the new curriculum that we are envisaging, we cannot contemplate the \neducation of the future. Today more than ever, when we see what is happening in this society, \nwhen we are reconstructing a new Mauritius, definitely at the basis of that reconstruction \nphase, we will need civic education. Sometimes I will say it, tongue in cheek, not only for \nstudents but for all Mauritians; we need that. Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, alright. So interesting, we were sleeping almost. I didn’t mean \nthat. I meant we were very interested, and it woke us up. \nThe hon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet!  \nDISABILITY ALLOWANCE/PENSION – CRITERIA & APPLICATION – \nDISCREPANCY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/31",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 31,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/31) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked the \nMinister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity whether, in regard to \ndisability allowance/pension, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n (a)  the criteria put in place by the Medical Board at his Ministry to benefit therefrom, \nindicating if the criteria differ to that applied by medical doctors employed by \npublic hospitals;  \n(b)  the number of cases – \n (i)  referred to his Ministry for evaluation and thereafter disallowed, and  \n(ii)  granted but thereafter suspended or cancelled, and  \n\n62 \n \n(c)  if his Ministry proposes to review the assessment and granting of such \nallowances.",
      "answer": "Mr Subron: With your permission, Madam Speaker, I shall answer Parliamentary \nQuestions B/31 and B/54 together, as they both relate to the same subject matter. \nMadam Speaker, I thank both hon. Members for their respective questions. I must say \nthat since I was appointed Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National \nSolidarity, I am in the presence of constant complaints and outcries in relation to the \nentitlements of our citizens to rights and benefits related to disabilities. Complaints are never-\nending and, on a daily basis, reported either to the Ministry, to me or to the Junior Minister, to \nmy colleague Ministers and to Members of this Assembly. Many citizens are of the view that \ntheir applications are unjustly rejected, disallowed or abruptly stopped. Many citizens cannot \nunderstand why they are constantly being called for new medical assessments on a yearly \nbasis when they view their disabilities as being of a permanent nature or when they are \ncompletely bedridden. \nMadam Speaker, the malfunctioning disability benefit system is exposed by the fact \nthat the average time spent by a medical doctor from the Medical Board to assess the degree \nof incapacity of a person and hence to determine his or her eligibility for Basic Invalid \nPension or Disability Allowance is less than five minutes per applicant.  \nConsequently, and in reply to part (c) of question B/31 and to the first part of PQ B/54, \nmy Ministry will formulate new policies and bring structural changes to the assessment \nprocesses and procedures used to determine pensions and allowance entitlements of our \ncitizens with disabilities. Same has already been mentioned in the Presidential Address and \nthe Attorney General is being notified of this legislative reform agenda. Disability-related \nNGOs, specialists and activists are being and will be further consulted in this context.  \nIn regard to part (a) of PQ B/31, I wish to inform the House that presently persons with \ndisabilities are entitled to an Invalid Basic Pension or a Disability Allowance after an \nassessment by a Medical Board. Additionally, as from July 2024, children suffering from a \ndisability of less than 15 years who are in receipt of an Invalid Basic Pension or a Disability \nAllowance are eligible for an additional monthly allowance of Rs3,000.  \nThe criteria for someone to benefit from an Invalid Basic Pension in accordance with \nsection 8 of the National Pensions Act 1976 is that the person be under the age of 60 years \n\n63 \n \nand have a disability of 60% or more which is likely to last for a period of at least 12 months. \nWith regard to eligibility for Disability Allowance, a person in accordance with section 30A \nof the Social Contribution Act and Social Benefits Act 2021 is entitled to same if, firstly, he \nhas a disability of not less than 40% and not exceeding 59% due to an injury or medical \ncondition specified in the sixth schedule of the Act – \n“(b) he is under the age of 60 years, and \n(c) he is not in receipt of a basic pension under the National Pensions Act.” \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of PQ B/31, I am informed that presently a \nmedical assessment is carried out by Medical Practitioners of my Ministry to determine the \neligibility of the Invalid Basic Pension and Disability Allowance. Assessments are carried out \neither by a Medical Board which comprises two Medical Practitioners or by one Medical \nPractitioner at the claimants’ residence for those who are bedridden and who cannot attend \nMedical Board. \nA Medical Guideline dated 2016 is also used by Medical Practitioners who sit on \nMedical Boards for assessment of claimants for the benefits.  \nThese guidelines have been prepared with the help of specialists in various fields from \nthe Ministry of Health and Wellness with the view to standardising the assessment made by \ndoctors while evaluating the eligibility of claimants. The guidelines also stipulate the duration \nof the award of the benefits. \nWith regard to the rest of part (a) of PQ B/31, I am further informed that medical \ndoctors employed in public hospitals only examine patients for their respective ailments for \nwhich they present themselves. This examination is not conducted to determine eligibility for \nany kind of benefit. However, medical certificates which are issued by medical doctors \nemployed in the public hospitals and private institutions are presented by claimants on \nMedical Board. The whole assessment process is presently under scrutiny and will be subject \nto review in the context of the upcoming reform. \nMadam Speaker, at present a person whose case has been disallowed by a Medical \nBoard or Domiciliary board has the right to make an appeal to the Medical Tribunal. The \nMedical Tribunal is composed of two specialists in relevant fields and is chaired by a \nrepresentative of the Attorney General’s office. The above step two will also be subject to a \nreview in the context of the coming reform. \n\n64 \n \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) (i) (ii) of PQ B/31, I am informed that from \nJuly 2015 to January 2025, my Ministry has received 88,628 applications for the invalid basic \npensions, out of which 44,301 cases have been allowed and 41,385 cases have been \ndisallowed by Medical Boards. \nI am further informing the House that as of February 2025, there are 26,057 \nbeneficiaries of invalid basic pensions and 630 beneficiaries of disability allowance. For the \ninformation of the House, I am tabling a document compiling the data of the cases processed \nfor the last ten years. \nMadam Speaker, this House can rest assured that this government will ensure that all \nour citizens who have disabilities will be treated with dignity, respect and a fair and caring \nmanner. \nThank you, Madam Speaker.  \nMr Rookny: Madame la présidente, tout d’abord, je voudrais remercier l’honorable \nministre pour les réponses qu’il nous a fournies. De sa réponse, je tiens que presque 50 % des \napplications pour l’allocation d’invalide ont été rejetées par un board composé d’un ou deux \nmédecins qui ne passent que cinq minutes pour évaluer ces cas. Donc les personnes qui ont \nbesoin de cette allocation d’invalidité sont souvent dans un grand besoin. Quelle mesure \nurgente peut le ministre proposer dans ces cas en attendant la réforme qui vient ? \nMadam Speaker: Question très pertinente ! \nMr Subron: Très pertinente! First, this will be the main component of the coming \nreform.  \nSecondly, what we are trying to do now is reorganise the team so that we can process \nthe applications in a speedier manner. We had a legal problem with the constitution of the \nboard; there was a mistake in the law which was clarified by the State Law Office, which \ntook time. I received the opinion of the State Law Office two weeks ago – of the legality of \nthe Medical Board. \nNow that this has been clarified, maybe we will also review the composition of the \nMedical Board which is performing these tests and seek their rational criteria when assessing \napplications for invalidity pensions or disability allowances. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \n\n65 \n \nMadam Speaker: So, the next question would now be from the hon. Third Member for \nPort Louis North and Montagne Longue. \nSAINTE CROIX, CITE LA CURE, RUISSEAU ROSE & LONG MOUNTAIN – PIPE \nLAYING WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/32",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 32,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/32) Mr L. M. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to pipes laying \nworks carried out in the region of Sainte Croix, Cité La Cure, Ruisseau Rose and Long \nMountain effected last year, he will state the reasons as to why the roads concerned with the \nlaying of pipes have not been resurfaced, indicating when remedial works will be undertaken.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Central Water Authority that \nthe road reinstatement works in these regions were delayed due to a shortage of bitumen on \nthe local market between June and September 2024. \nI am further informed that the Central Water Authority launched another bid exercise in \nthe North in October 2024. The two bids received were evaluated. However, approval was \nnot obtained for the award of the contract due to the last General Elections. I can assure the \nhon. Member that this project would be looked into as a matter of priority. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac.  \nCWA – RIVIÈRE DES ANGUILLES DAM PROJECT – FUNDS EARMARKED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/33",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 33,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/33) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the Rivière des \nAnguilles Dam Project, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water \nAuthority, information as to the amount of fund earmarked during the current financial year \nfor the construction of the dam.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, le projet de barrage de la Rivière des Anguilles \nétait à l’ordre du jour du gouvernement précédent pendant tout son mandat de cinq ans. Le \nprojet a été annoncé lors des discours budgétaires successifs et des fonds ont été alloués à sa \nmise en œuvre pendant cinq ans ou même sept ans. \nEn 2020, Madame la présidente, l’ancien gouvernement avait annoncé que le barrage \nde la Rivière des Anguilles serait construit pour un coût estimé à environ R 7,5 million. Je \nparle en 2020 ; cinq ans de cela – milliards, pardon ! \n\n66 \n \nDans le discours sur le budget de 2021-22, l’octroi des fonds pour la construction du \nbarrage et de la station de traitements des eaux a été annoncé. Des fonds à la hauteur de R \n100 millions ont été de nouveau annoncés dans le discours de 2022-2023 pour démarrer la \nconstruction du barrage de la Rivière des Anguilles. \nDans le cas du dernier budget 2023-24, il a été indiqué que la conception détaillée et la \npréparation du projet du barrage de la Rivière des Anguilles avaient été finalisées. \nMalheureusement, il ne s’est presque rien passé. \nThis year, Madam Speaker, an amount of Rs930 million has been provided in the \nEstimates of 2025-25 du dernier gouvernement pour la construction de ce Rivière des \nAnguilles Project. \nMerci. \nMr Jhummun: Can the hon.  Minister inform the House whether we are coming with \nthe project or ça va rester l’éternelle poulidor? Merci.  \nMr Assirvaden: Madame Speaker, si vous me le permettez avec votre permission. \nMadam Speaker: Allez-y ! \nMr Assirvaden: I am informed that the pre-qualification exercise for the construction \nof Rivière des Anguilles was launched in February 2024, l’année dernière, under the aegis of \nthe Central Procurement Board. The closing date, en avril 2024, 9 applicants had submitted \ntheir proposals, and following an evaluation exercise conducted by the Central Procurement \nBoard, the Ministry was informed that 08 firms had been shortlisted. It is to be noted, hon. \nMember, Madame la présidente, that in accordance with the loan agreement signed with the \nfunding agencies, their prior no-objection to the evaluation exercises and shortlisted bidders \nis required before proceeding with the notification process in accordance with the Public \nProcurement Act. \nI am further informed that once the funding agencies have conveyed their no-objection \nto the shortlist of bidders established by the Central Procurement Board, the bidding exercise \nfor the appointment of a work contractor would be launched by the Central Procurement \nBoard. \nIt is expected, hon. Member, Madame la présidente, that the bidding exercise for the \nappointment of a contractor and the subsequent no-objection of funding agencies to the \n\n67 \n \nselection of a contractor may take around 6 months. The duration for the construction of the \ndam is around 40 months, 2029-2030. Merci. \n \nMadam Speaker: May I just find out if we are going in a wrong direction. We were \non B/33? You finished B/32? It was also… \n(Interruptions) \n \nMr Jhummun: Sorry, I am still fishing for information. I want to hear from the hon. \nMinister when we are starting with the project. Thank you. \n \nMr Assirvaden: It is expected to start the work end of this year, December 2025. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Now, we have the hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES – ANIMAL FEED SHORTAGE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/34",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 34,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/34) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nCommerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the problems of shortage of animal \nfeed in Rodrigues, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the reasons for the \nreduction in the stock delivery of animal feed from Mauritius, and \n(b) \nstate the measure, if any, being envisaged to remedy the situation.",
      "answer": "Mr Yeung Sik Yuen: Madam Speaker, I am informed there is a shortage of animal \nfeed since the beginning of January 2025. According to the information provided so far, \nproducers in Mauritius did not provide the normal amount of animal feed to supply to \nRodrigues in December 2024. There was also an increase in demand in the consumption of \nanimal feed from 468 containers of 20 ft in 2023 to 542 containers in 2024. Therefore, an \nincrease of 74 containers was noted. \nMadam Speaker, regarding part (b) of the question, I have been informed that the \nRodrigues Regional Assembly has already initiated discussions with stakeholders concerned, \nincluding the Mauritius Ports Authority, Mauritius Shipping Company Limited, Velogic \nLimited and Associated Container Services Ltd, to devise and implement short-term \nmeasures to address the challenges which have been identified so far. \nI further note that the Rodrigues Regional Assembly has reported that it will continue \nto encourage and facilitate the business community in Rodrigues to enhance their \nwarehousing and storage capacity. \n\n68 \n \nMr François: I thank the hon. Minister for his answer, Madam Speaker. I am also \nfollowing up with the importers and breeders in Rodrigues. With regard to the number of \ncontainers of livestock feed and meeders feed on each Peros Banhos voyage to Rodrigues \nlately, I have some statistics: On 03 December, 12 containers; 04 January, 10 containers; 15 \nJanuary, 23 containers; and 25 January, 25 containers. Will the hon. Minister ensure and \nrequest the concerned authorities not to reduce the normal containers quota for animal feed? \nFrom information gathered from breeders, there were many animal losses during the period \nof December and January. \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: I believe the hon. Member should have asked the question to \nmy colleague, the Minister of Shipping, but I will talk to him. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, alright. That is fair enough. \nDr. Boolell: Already talked! \nMadam Speaker: Fair enough, okay! \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: I spoke to him on Friday. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes!  \nST JEAN – FLOODING – FAST-TRACK PROJECT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/35",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 35,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/35) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the fast-track project to \nprevent flooding at St Jean, he will state where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, I am informed that on 29 November 2023, work \norders amounting to a total sum of Rs66 m., inclusive of VAT, were issued under the \nframework agreement of the Road Development Authority to Gamma Construction Ltd to \nundertake the drain works over a stretch of some 800 meters along Old Moka Road up to \nRivière Sèche located near the MCB building with a view to mitigating flooding at St Jean. \nThe region of St Jean, being a densely populated area with an extensive network of \nburied services, appropriate measures had to be undertaken to prevent any disruption in the \nexisting services and to avoid inconvenience to the inhabitants thereat. \nConsequently, trial pit works had to be carried out to identify buried services. The \nworks which started on 13 November 2023 were expected to be completed by 30 May 2024. \nHowever, the project has not yet been completed for various reasons. This project has been \n\n69 \n \ndeclared an emergency whereby the risk to life and damage to property were significant. Yet, \nit has been delayed for almost one year. Since my assumption of office as minister, I have \nexpressed my dissatisfaction with the progress made up to now. I have chaired several \nmeetings with different stakeholders to remove all bottlenecks being encountered and to \nexpedite the completion of the project. \nI have been informed that the delays in the project were the result of major relocation \nand realignment works pertaining to the extensive underground services, such as the CWA \nwaterlines, Emtel lines, Mauritius Telecom lines and sewer lines. I also wish to highlight that \ndue to major relocation, realignment works and the increase in volume of excavation, the cost \nof the project now stands at some Rs180 m., for which financial clearance has already been \nsecured. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that the relocation of all underground services \nhas now been completed, except for the relocation of the sewer lines, which is ongoing and \nexpected to be completed by 22 February 2025. As at date, 70% of the works have been \ncompleted. The drain is expected to be functional by 26 February 2025, and the whole project \nis expected to be completed by 15 March 2025. \nMadam Speaker, let me reassure the House that in the event of heavy rainfall in the \nregion of St Jean, prior to the completion of the project, both the consultant and the contractor \nhave been requested to ensure that all measures are taken to avoid flooding and associated \ndamages. The contractor has also been requested to mobilise mobile pumps of adequate \ncapacity in standby mode along with water carrier lorries to pump out water at the cemetery’s \nentrance if required. Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Je remercie le ministre \négalement pour sa réponse. Madame la présidente, des tombes provenant du cimetière de St-\nJean ont envahi la cour des habitants. Un projet supposément en mode fast-track accuse un \nretard indécent. Nous parlons de 250 tombes endommagées, Madame la présidente. \nC’est grave ! Et tout cela, sous l’ancien régime ! Les habitants de St Jean vivent dans \nla peur à chaque grosse pluie. Vu la grande urgence, est-ce que le ministre envisage \nd’organiser un site visit dans les plus brefs délais avec les différents départements concernés, \ns’il vous plaît, parce que je peux vous dire que les habitants vivent dans une grande \npeur.  Merci, Madame la présidente. \n\n70 \n \nMr Gunness: Madam Speaker, the hon. Member is right in saying that this project was \nsupposed to be an emergency project. It took one year because there was no follow-up action \nand because we had many stakeholders involved – the CWA, the Telecom, and Emtel. I have \ngone through the file, and I have not seen any meeting chaired by the former minister, at least \nto expedite matters so that the project can go fast. We can imagine that now the project has \ngone up from Rs66 m. to Rs180 m. It has taken nearly one year, putting the lives of people in \ndanger there. \nSo, now, as soon as I assumed office, I chaired meetings so that we can expedite \nmatters. As I have said to the hon. Member, we are expecting the completion of the project by \n15 March. The drain will be functional on 26 February, and the whole project will be \nfunctional by 15 March. But I have no objection to having a site visit. We can fix a common \ndate so that we can go on site and explain to the people. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, the hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and \nQuatre Bornes. \nCANDOS GOVERNMENT SCHOOL – ROAD SAFETY MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/36",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 36,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/36) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to road safety around Candos Government \nSchool, he will state if consideration will be given for the installation of a pedestrian \ncrossing, appropriate signage, traffic lights, speed bumps and cameras thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Traffic Management \nand Road Safety Unit of my Ministry that it has thoroughly effected a road safety inspection \naround Candos Government School, and the following measures have been recommended – \n(i) \nThe setting up of a pedestrian crossing to ensure safe crossing of school \nchildren, the fixing of warning signs to indicate the presence of school, the \nfixing of 40 km/h speed limit signs, the painting of ‘SLOW’ road markings on \napproaches to the school gates, and the fixing of handrails over a length of \nabout 50 metres to properly segregate pedestrian traffic from vehicular traffic \nalong Tolerance Avenue fronting Candos Government School; \n(ii) \nThe fixing of warning signs to indicate the presence of a school along Robert \nEdward Hart Avenue, and \n\n71 \n \n(iii) \nThe reinstatement of all traffic signs associated with existing humps, the fixing \nof warning signs to indicate the presence of a school and the fixing of a 40 km \nspeed limit along Seechurn Avenue. \nMadam Speaker, the TMRSU is currently working on the cost estimate in respect of the \nrecommended measures that I have listed above.  \nAt this moment in time, like I said earlier, no contract for civil works can, however, be \nawarded under the framework agreement because the same has expired and new tenders will \nhave to be launched. This might take some time; funds are also being identified in the \nmeantime because, like I said earlier, again, all funds had been used up before my arrival at \nthe Ministry – I am told. Once funds are secured, a procurement exercise and onwards awards \nof contract for implementing the measures that I have listed will take place. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente, une seule supplémentaire. Est-\nce que le ministre pourrait nous donner une indication par rapport à une date ? Nous parlons \nde la sécurité des enfants qui, à chaque sortie de classe, courent. On s’attend au pire. Est-ce \nqu’on peut avoir une indication sur un timeframe, allons dire ? Merci. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes, like I said, a framework agreement is a tender that covers \nthe whole island of Mauritius for works to be implemented by TMRSU, and it is awarded by \nthe Central Procurement Board. So, there is a procedure to be followed, but also, funds are \nbeing identified. I can safely say that within the next 3 to 4 months we should be able to see \ndaylight on this. \nMs Anquetil: Permettez-moi une question. Une petite parce que je n’ai pas eu la \nréponse complète. \nMadam Speaker: La réponse était claire pourtant. Allez-y. \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. On parle de la vie des enfants \nen bas âge, des mineurs. Je voudrais savoir, Monsieur le ministre, en attendant… Je \ncomprends qu'il y a des procédures, oui, tout à fait, je respecte les procédures, ok. En \nattendant, ces enfants traversent la rue d’une façon vraiment brutale parce qu’ils ne \ncomprennent pas, ils ne savent pas, il n’y a pas de policiers, il n’y a pas de passage piéton, il \nn’y a rien. Alors, on voudrait savoir est-ce qu’en attendant vous auriez pu mettre des mesures \nen place pour pouvoir justement sécuriser ces enfants ? Merci. \n\n72 \n \nMadam Speaker: Il faut mettre les lollipop men, you know, ceux qui se mettent debout \nau milieu de la rue tout ça pour faire traverser les enfants ! \nMr Osman Mahomed: I can certainly look into it to ensure that road safety measures \nare being implemented. I will do it. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. The hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière! \nNHDC – COROMANDEL – HOUSING UNITS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/37",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 37,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/37) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nMinister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the construction of National Housing \nDevelopment Company units in Coromandel, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Company, information as to the work progress thereof, indicating – \n (a) the eligibility criteria to be selected as beneficiary; \n (b) when applicants are expected to be called for interview, and \n (c) the policy for the allocation of the housing units.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Madam Speaker, I presume that my hon. colleague is referring to the \nconstruction project of 750 housing units being undertaken by the New Social Living \nDevelopment (NSLD) at Coromandel. I am informed by the NSLD that 70% of the on-site \nconstruction works, housing units and on-site infrastructure have been completed. These \nworks are expected to be completed by the end of June 2025.  \nAs regards part (a) of the question, the main criteria to benefit from social housing units \nare as follows – \n(i) \nthe monthly household income of the applicant should not exceed Rs40,000; \n(ii) \nthe applicant should not be the owner of housing units or residential plot of \nland; and \n(iii) \nthe applicant should not have benefitted from any government grant for the \ncasting of roof slabs and for the purchase of building materials. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b), the applicant will be called for interview 2 to 3 \nmonths prior to the completion of the project. However, allow me to halt at this stage to \nunderline the following: there is a misconception among the members of the public believing \nthat calling them for the interview means that they have been granted the right to a house. No. \nI would like to underline that calling them for an interview does not guarantee the obtention \n\n73 \n \nof the house. It is only to assess the eligibility of each applicant, and that is the purpose of the \ninterview.  \nIn regard to part (c), the 750 housing units at Coromandel will be allocated as follows – \n \n100 units for families living in Constituency No. 1 \n \n50 units for families living in Constituency No. 2 \n \n200 units for families living in Constituency No. 19 \n \n400 units for families living in Constituency No. 20 \nThose are my answers, and if the hon. Members require any additional information, I \nshall be glad to oblige. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente, peut-on savoir de l’honorable ministre, en ce qui \nconcerne les futurs acquéreurs, s'il y aura plusieurs catégories ? Je veux dire en fonction des \ndifférents critères de sélection, de remboursement et de revenus, bien sûr. \nMr Mohamed: I think this is a very important question that needs, in fact, an answer. \nThere are two ways of proceeding. I could proceed by tabling the criteria for allocation of \nNSLD housing units, which I will; I believe it is important for it to be a public document, and \nI will just briefly say that over and above the fact that I talked about 40,000 income, the date \nof application, of course, is of utmost importance. I have found through my research at the \nlevel of the Ministry that it was not obviously the Ministry that carried out the whole idea of \nallocation of houses; it is either the NHDC or the NSLD and committees therein. I am \nconvinced that there has been misuse of power. I am convinced there have been people who \nhave listened to orders coming from some sort of kitchen to decide not which cook is going \nto go therein but who is going to be living where and when and in what type of house. This is \nbasically, our lives and the lives of citizens of this country were dictated from beginning to \nend by someone in charge of this kitchen. \nSo, in order to put some order in the kitchen, I would like to blow up the kitchen and \nstart afresh, but then again, the people did it for us; they blew it up. So now, household type \nand composition – that also is a criterion. A couple with dependants earns 10 marks – there is \na marking system. Hon. Osman Mahomed, now Minister, at one point in time he was at the \nNHDC, if I am not mistaken; he was also one of those responsible for the setting up of these \ncriteria, as well as hon. Bashir Khodabux at one point in time, but those are legacies that were \nleft. \n\n74 \n \nUnfortunately, some people have found ways and means of going round the excellent \nwork they have done in order to give houses, and the condition of obtaining houses was how \nmuch of a nice person you are, holding up the drapeau of certain people, but this is not what \nwe are about. \nSo, criteria are very important, and we are not going to be choosing based on political \nappurtenance, on where you are, who you are, what you are and how close you are. It is \ncriteria, and it is going to be rule-based. So, I can assure the hon. Member of that. Catchment \narea is obviously important because, as I have said, some people come from certain \nconstituencies; therefore, where you live, where you come from, is also a very important \ncriterion. Then you have criteria for allocation to hardship cases; I have had the opportunity \nof speaking with my learned colleague Minister Ashok Subron, whereby he has intimated his \nwish to be more helpful and grant more help to the needy, victims of fire, cyclones, floods, \nnatural disasters, domestic violence, single parents with dependents, and persons with severe \nmedical conditions and impairments. \nMy hon. friend, Minister Subron, has spoken to me about that. So, I can assure the hon. \nMember, the House, and those listening to us, Madam Speaker, that we will be rule-based and \nthere will be no favouritism and discrimination. \nAllow me to add, however, that if there are delays, it is because offsite works have not \nbeen completed because the then Government created a company called DICL. It gave the \nresponsibility to DICL to carry out drain works all around the island, around NSLD projects. \nAnd I can say that they have not been functioning very well. We have had very urgent \nmeetings chaired by the Senior Chief Executive of my ministry with DICL and the officers in \norder to ensure… \nYes, I know the problematic, but then again, it is not the responsibility of the present \nMinister to have started last year. When the project started, they should have started then. So, \nit is through the incompetence of the then Government and the minister in charge; I cannot \nremember his name, the then Bobby, or some name of that nature. I cannot remember \nwhether it was him, but through incompetence, he did not start it. And the hon. Member will \nremember, if I am not mistaken, he himself a déjà croisé le fer with those incompetents. \nThank you. \n\n75 \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, he has not finished.  \nMr Quirin: Une chose qu’on a souvent tendance à oublier, c’est qu’avec les pluies \ntorrentielles et les inondations récurrentes, l’honorable ministre peut-il nous dire si les \nconstructeurs ont prévu un système de drain afin d’évacuer l’eau, évitant ainsi que les \nappartements au rez-de-chaussée soient inondés comme c’est le cas au complexe de Vétiver à \nPetite Rivière ? \nMr Mohamed: I can assure the hon. Member that as an example that I can give, only \nyesterday I had the pleasure of going to a site visit in Constituency No. 1 with hon. Minister \nArianne Navarre-Marie who is here, and hon. Fabrice David, who is also together with me. \nWe went for a visit in Constituency No. 1, and there we have been very careful to note little \nissues – little issues which, in fact, are very important – drain works, and we found that all of \nthem have made provision, but I come back to DICL.  \nDICL is given the task of completing offsite works, precisely in order to ensure that \nthose projects are not flooded, and this is very important, but unfortunately, there are projects \nfor which the houses are ready, but I will not be able to deliver; at least NSLD will not be \nable to deliver to beneficiaries, and you will find that there will be dégradation of the quality \nof material because you are closing the houses. We have to wait for the offsite drain works to \nbe completed because we do not want such situations to occur where people are flooded in, \nbut those are issues high on the agenda, and we are working closely with the new Minister of \nNational Infrastructure and all my colleagues in Cabinet. We are also being helped by \nMembers of Parliament, backbenchers who are giving us a lot of information and assistance \nto ensure that we give a better product to the beneficiaries.  \nAnd let me hasten to add that they have not even considered the possibility of adding \nsolar panels on the roof in order to provide for hot water. They have not even considered \nrainwater harvesting when we are talking about the age of climate change and the need to \nhave an environmentally sustainable construction. They have thought very fast but have been \nincompetent in the end result. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister. \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente, dernière question ! \n\n76 \n \nMadam Speaker: Allez-y, il me reste… \nMr Quirin: Rapidement. Peut-on savoir de l’honorable ministre quelles sont les \ninfrastructures sociales et de loisir qui ont été prévues pour les… \nMadam Speaker: Non, non, non ! Je ne peux pas vous laisser, parce que ça, c’est \nnouveau. Une nouvelle question sera bien pour la semaine prochaine. \nMr Mohamed: I will share it with you. \nMr Quirin: Okay. \nMadam Speaker: Non, parce que ça c’est nouveau. Quand même. Allez-y ! \nMr Quirin: Non, c’est par rapport au contexte de… \nMadam Speaker: Mais, on peut parler de tout si on veut ! Allez-y, Monsieur, après ! \nMr Beechook: Oui, Madame la présidente. J’aimerais demander à M. le ministre que \nbeaucoup de personnes se sont plaintes qu’elles sont sur une liste d’attente depuis plus de 20 \nans, une dizaine, vingtaine d’années, et que, lorsqu’ils appellent ou ils rendent visite au \nbureau de la NHDC, ils se plaignent de dossiers perdus. Can the Minister please put up a \ncampaign or a fast track campaign afin de réactualiser les dossiers des demandeurs en vue du \nprocessus d’allocation des logements sociaux ? \nMr Mohamed: Even though, Madam Speaker, it does not really… but it is within the \nambit if I may help. I do not want to adopt such a fast track that we have unfortunately as \nhon. Ms Stéphanie Anquetil has said. We have what we have had where people are at \nCimetière St Jean with the fast track. So, we do not want that. We want to sort out the \nproblem, and the issue is that, with the new government and the new direction at the level of \nboth the NHDC and the NSLD, what we are ensuring to do is that there is a proper customer \nservice, that we ensure that those criteria are adhered to, but that there is an efficient \ncommunication between the end user and the builders; the promoters. \nSo, this is what we need to do, because a lot of the times, I totally agree with you, I end \nup being the one answering at least hundreds of calls a day, which is happening to my home. \nAnd just to add it up, I tested the customer service at the NHDC last year as soon as I took \noffice and I pretended to be someone from Curepipe and I waited for 20 minutes and I still \n\n77 \n \ndid not get the answer. So, in other words, in the first week, I can assure you that those issues \nhave been attended to and I am very thankful to the officers of the NHDC, NSLD and the \nMinistry for really helping to improve service and I am sure that we will be successful. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nMrs Savabaddy: Merci, Madame la présidente. M. le ministre, en parlant des critères \nd’éligibilité, plusieurs familles sont dans l’attente depuis des lustres, nous le savons tous. \nQu’en est-il de ceux qui ont déjà atteint l’âge de la retraite, voire 60 ans + ? Est-ce qu’ils \ndevront attendre longtemps ? Est-ce qu’un jour, ils pourront devenir propriétaires d’une \nmaison de la NHDC et est-ce qu’il y aura aussi une attention particulière ? Je vous attends, \nmerci. \nMr Mohamed: I thank the hon. Member for the question. I have had the opportunity of \nmeeting MauBank, one of the financing institutions, precisely for many other cases that were \nfinding some difficulties, but precisely for old-age pensioners who have been on the list for \nmany years, and they were saying that they could not consider that they were eligible for a \nloan because of their age. So, we have tried to find solutions together, and one of the \nsolutions would be that one of the relatives, a child, would be guaranteeing the loan and take \non that responsibility. \nGrosso modo we are finding solutions, and I do agree with the hon. Member that many \npeople have waited, not only old-age pensioners. You have a lot of single mothers; you have a \nlot of mothers who are divorced with children who need to find a home to live in and do not \nwant to continuously be paying rent, and they want to become homeowners. We have more \nthan 40,000 applications. The previous government had said that they were delivering 6,000 \nhouses before the end of their mandate in 2024. That was a lie. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister. Hon. Juman, First Member for Port Louis \nMaritime and Port Louis East. \nSTATE LAND – PAS GEOMETRIQUES – LESSEES & LEASING FEES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/38",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 38,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/38) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port Louis Maritime & Port Louis \nEast) asked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to State Lands on Pas \nGéométriques, he will state the total number of lessees thereof, indicating the – \n\n78 \n \n(a) \namount of outstanding leasing fees, if any, as at date, and  \n(b) \nlessees whose leasing fees are due for more than 24 months, giving a breakdown \nof the fees due.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Madam Speaker, once again let me thank the hon. Member for the \nquestion. So, as a prelude to the answer, Pas Géométriques basically consists of a narrow \nbelt, theoretically 81.21 metres in width nearly all around the coast of the island of Mauritius \nand are state-owned. I am informed that there are approximately 6,405 leases that have been \ngranted by my Ministry over Pas Géométriques. Let me hasten to add that this was not \ngranted by me ever since we came into office. \nIn regard to part (a), I am informed that as of 31 December 2024, the outstanding rental \nin respect of all leases, including all those Pas Géométriques, is approximately Rs1.8 billion. \nYes, that is the figure that is owed for all those leases –Rs1.8 billion. \nIn regard to part (b), I understand that there are more than 11,000 leases, both on Pas \nGéométriques and non-Pas Géométriques, which are in arrears of annual rental for more than \n24 months. The amount due is approximately Rs968 m.; almost a billion is owed to the \ngovernment by those lessees.  \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMr Juman: Hon. Minister, is it possible to table the list of the debtors and the \nrespective amount due? \nMadam Speaker : Un peu plus fort, s’il vous plait ! \nMr Juman: Je demande à l’honorable ministre s’il peut déposer la liste des débiteurs. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nMr Mohamed: I must admit that I have the list in my hand. But I have to take advice \nfrom the Attorney General’s Office to ensure that I am not in violation of any data protection \nlegislation before I do this because it holds names, addresses and what is owed.  \nHowever, I must say that I am considering at the level of the Ministry that we have to \nrecuperate this money. It cannot be that we do not recoup this money because I am aware as \n\n79 \n \nwell from memory that there is Article 2279 of the Civil Code. Article 2279 of the Civil Code \nis that we can only claim three years back in terms of rent, and I will have to seek \nconfirmation of that from the Attorney General’s Office. But we will have to find whether \nany non-payment of such money to the government, causing prejudice to the government, is a \nviolation of contract. If this is a violation of contract, it means what it means. It means that \nwe would therefore be able to consider whether or not we take action for breach of contract. \nWe will also see whether we can recuperate. \nBut we will endeavour – I can reassure the hon. Member and I thank him for his \nquestion again – to recuperate all of it. We will go after each one of them and explore all \navenues. We will try to ensure that the mandate that has been given to us, we will honour it \nand not let this go away into oblivion as though it is nothing. This is owed to the people, and \nit must be refunded. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \nMr Seeburn: Madam Speaker, being given that we are talking about state land \noccupied by these holders on Pas Géométriques, in order to alleviate this situation, would the \nhon. Minister consider the possibility of granting the opportunity to residential leaseholders, \nin particular those who have occupied those lands for more than 30 years, to have the \nfreehold title at a price which can be determined by the government under his Ministry? \nMr Mohamed: If my friend is referring to the Pas Géométriques, there would be issues \nthere because then, the Pas Géométriques, from my knowledge, is inalienable. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, exactly. \nMr Mohamed: I like it when I see the Attorney General nodding, and he is Senior \nCounsel. I love it! Thank you.  \nSo, we would have to amend the law. Then, this is something which would require the \ngovernment to take a policy decision, and this is not for me to pronounce myself on. \nDifficult, however! But already, as far back as I recall, the Labour Party, at one point in time, \nwhen in government, had made legislative changes in order to allow owners of CHA houses \nto become owners for the modique somme de R 2,000. And this is continuing. This is a social \n\n80 \n \nmeasure brought in by the Labour Party that is continuing. I am happy to see that a lot of \npeople are becoming homeowners. \nMadam Speaker: But Pas Géométriques is another issue. I think we will stop here.  \nI have a few questions that have, in fact, been withdrawn: B/42, B/45, B/49, B/52, \nB/57, B/58, B/60, B/65, B/68, B/69, and B/70. Hon. Members agree with these? You have \nwithdrawn your questions, and I understand why you did that. So, if you agree, we will stop \nQuestion Time here! \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I move that all the business on today’s Order \nPaper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: It means you are staying late! \nPUBLIC BILL \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Financial Crimes Commission (Miscellaneous \nProvisions) Bill (No. I of 2025) was read a first time. \nMOTION \nGOVERNMENT PROGRAMME 2025-2029  \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka! My \npleasure! \n(4.12 p.m.) \n\n81 \n \nDr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka): Thank you, \nMadam Speaker. \nI beg to move the motion standing in my name – \n“This Assembly resolves that the Government Programme 2025-2029 presented to this \nAssembly on Friday 24 January 2025, copy of which has been circularized amongst \nHonourable Members, be and is hereby approved.” \nMadam Speaker, dear hon. Members, I am deeply honoured to address this august \nAssembly on the occasion of my maiden speech in the context of the debates on the 2025-\n2029 Government Programme, presented by His Excellency the President of Mauritius, Mr \nDharam Gokhool. \nAs a new Member of this Assembly, a neophyte, I am privileged to initiate discussions \non a groundbreaking programme that binds us to our destiny, that is, to serve this land and its \npeople with diligence, honour and integrity. As a new parliamentarian, I thank the Prime \nMinister, hon. Dr. Navinchandra Ramgoolam and our Deputy Prime Minister, hon. Paul \nBérenger, for having bestowed upon me the duty to serve the nation.  \nAlong with my fellow new Members of the Assembly, I can affirm that we are \nprivileged and honoured to have been chosen by the people to represent them, to fight for \ntheir best interests and lead a nation from darkness to light with our dreams and hopes, \nshaping a guiding beacon.  \nMay I express my gratitude to our leaders for having embraced the aspirations and hope \nof every citizen for a land where our human rights and dignity are respected and valued, a \nland where humanity is protected and our future held dearly. This programme epitomises the \nleaders of the Alliance of Change’s commitment to build a government of the people, by the \npeople, for the people.  \nWe, elected Members of this Assembly, sit at the cusp of history. We have been \nentrusted with the people’s faith to rebuild a nation that was formerly entrapped in the throes \nof pain and despair. With this programme, we carry the flame of hope the people have \nconferred upon us. We carry the aspirations of thousands of men, women, youth and elderly \nwho have dreamt of a land where life shall flourish. Above all, we have been bestowed with a \n\n82 \n \nduty of rebuilding a land with a programme that encapsulates the essence of struggles led by \nworkers, ecologists, human rights activists, feminists and engaged citizens who firmly believe \nin a fair and just society for each and every citizen.  \nAs an eco-socialist with an unflinching faith that a free and equitable world can be \nconstructed for us all, this programme empowers me to continue the people’s struggle for \nsocial, economic and ecological justice. \nThe 2025-2029 Government Programme in its entirety imbues us with hope and pride. \nIt anchors in our spirit an unflinching sense of duty towards our people, our nation and our \nhomeland.  \nIt is indeed a bridge to the future, a brighter, more secure and peaceful future. \nAs noted by His Excellency the President, the country had experienced one of the \ndarkest periods of its history prior to the November 2024 elections. In contrast, this \nProgramme paves the path into a future where this Government is strongly responsive to the \nneeds and aspirations of its people. May I express my deep gratitude to His Excellency the \nPresident of Mauritius who articulated our vision with shared faith, hope and commitment. \nThis Programme channels our manifesto, the history-making signed agreement among four \npolitical parties to lead a nation from darkness to light, from despair to hope, from \nsubjugation to freedom. It is the bridge to a safe and empowered future for the people.  \nMay I congratulate you, Madam Speaker, on your nomination. Madam, you have \nensured so far that the Assembly is an illustrious democratic space where the freedom of \nexpression is upheld in utmost respect. Dear Madam, you symbolise the aspiration of us, \nMauritian feminists, and you are a role model to us all. Though we may appear little, we are \nfierce, as our dear Shakespeare said about strong women. \nMadam Speaker, I am deeply grateful to this Government, to our inspired leaders who \nhave dared to augur systemic change that shall protect the democratic rights of future \ngenerations. This Government is embarking on key constitutional reforms to protect the \nnation from any further violation of our democratic rights. The dark days we formerly \nexperienced are deeply scarred in our memory, and we are still tending to our wounds. The \nbalm, Madam Speaker, has been provided with the future Constitutional Review \nCommission. It is to be noted that this Commission will guarantee that Local Government \nElections will be held regularly according to law. This Commission further has been tasked \n\n83 \n \nwith incorporating public interest litigation and class action into the Constitution. In a healthy \ndemocracy, people should be empowered to reflect, question, mobilise and take action. \nHistory has been made repeatedly when people mobilised to overthrow injustice across the \nworld. With the forthcoming public interest litigation and class action motion, we are proud \nof a government that places faith in the people’s independence, leadership, intelligence and \ndecision-making capacities. \nMauritius has shone as a firm model of democratic freedom when the people rose to \noust its former regime under which it had been suffocating. Constitutional reforms hailing \ndemocratic rights are the hallmark of a government ready to serve the people. The right to \nrecall motion recognises similarly the primacy of public interest. It augurs good governance \nand accountability and guarantees future generations that their needs will be prioritised. \nLikewise, through the concerted address of digital rights, this Government Programme \nemphasises its commitment to protecting the people from the former invasive surveillance \nthat threatened every fabric of our lives and robbed us of our serenity. A healthy democracy is \nwhere each citizen breathes freedom, where each citizen can reflect, think critically and \ncontribute to the country’s wellbeing. The November 2024 elections precisely demonstrated \nthe people’s intelligence, their firm stance against oppression and their refusal to be swayed \nby money and false promises.  \nThe Freedom of Information Act further seals the will of this Government to construct a \nmodel democratic state where every media organ will be free, where each citizen’s voice can \nbe heard and heeded. A healthy dynamic and functional participatory democracy will be the \nhistorical legacy of this government, a government that seeks to empower people rather than \ndivide and rule. A Government that aims to recognise our brotherhood and sisterhood, a \nnation with a shared cultural history, rather than draw boundaries based on obsolete and \nabsurd ethnic divisions, is a government that is decolonising our minds.  \nI am immensely proud to be a member of this Government that will undertake \nconstitutional reforms whereby any Mauritian may stand for elections as a Mauritian. This \nGovernment is, thus, discarding the divisive legacy of colonisation. As a former academic \nwho specialised in postcolonial cultural histories of embodied resistance and resilience, I can \nbut beam with pride and respect for our leaders who are making history and ending decades \nof injustice. This Government is indeed entrenching the decolonisation of minds, souls and \nthe entire island. It is setting an example for the post-colonial world to condemn and reject \n\n84 \n \nthe toxic colonial legacy of divide and rule. This Government is setting an example for the \nentire world to emulate by forging a future where communalism may be dismantled and our \nshared humanity valued. \nMadam Speaker, system change is what we need to build a better, fair and just society. \nThis is embedded in our Government Programme where the Just Transition Commission will \nbe set up to anchor a firm ecological consciousness in every socio-economic endeavour.  \nIn a context of economic crisis and chaos, our leaders are to be lauded for having \nunderstood the ecological imperatives on which human survival depends. The Programme is \nan affirmation of this Government’s commitment to protecting life, nature and the land. By \ninserting the rights of nature in the Constitution, this Programme will align this Government \nalong with the visionary and exemplary nations such as New Zealand, India and Canada, \nwhich recognise nature as a right bearing entity.  \nFor a fervent ecologist, inserting the rights of nature in the Constitution is the prime \nsignal of a government that is cognisant of the life-threatening implications of the climate \ncrisis. I warmly thank all ecologists who have led multiple struggles to which our government \nleaders have now responded with utmost sensitivity. Nature is life. Nature is our mother. \nNature is our home. Nature does not belong to us. We belong to it. This Government has \nsolemnly pledged to protect nature. It has solemnly pledged to protect life. It has solemnly \npledged to protect us all and our land. Thank you to our leaders from the depth of our \necological souls that have been seared by the past destruction of our ecosystems. The \nprotection of our ESAs, that is, our Environmentally Sensitive Areas, similarly illustrates how \nthis Government has embraced eco-consciousness. This is hope. This is the bridge to the \nfuture; we embrace it wholeheartedly. \nMadam Speaker, economic crises are engineered to shape precarity, psychosis and a \nsense of fragility that make us vulnerable to economic predators. It is within this context that \nwe need to appreciate this Programmes’ emphasis on socio-economic rights. This Programme \nepitomises our leaders’ refusal to sacrifice the people’s rights, well-being and future, no \nmatter how deep we are mired in troubled economic waters. Our leaders will not sacrifice our \npeople on the altar of economic imperatives. This is true humanism. This is true leadership. \nThis is true ethos-driven decision-making. Thank you. \nI acclaim this government’s insistence on protecting workers, women in particular, with \nregard to the regulation of working hours with the 40-hour workweek. The provision of \n\n85 \n \nmaternity leave for up to one year and flexi-time for women, as well as work-from-home \nschemes. As a feminist, I have strongly deplored the manner in which capitalism exploits \nwomen who bear the burden of social reproduction and care work, both of which are \ninvaluable to the economy. \nThe economic value of work carried out mostly by women in the home is silenced, \nerased, and taken for granted because capitalism instrumentalises patriarchy. Measures \nannounced in the Government Programme with regards to workers’ rights place an onus on \nwork-life balance and seek to ease the mental charge of women. I am grateful to women who \nwithstand the demands of capitalism. I am grateful to feminists who fight for women’s care \nwork to be valued. I am grateful to our decision-makers who have finally acknowledged that \nwomen’s work matters, women’s bodies matter and patriarchy needs to be dismantled for \nwomen to thrive. \nSimilarly, I applaud the visionary step to be taken to amend the artist status in the law. \nThe artist will no more be condemned to survive in an exploitative, denigrating and \ndestructive system. This programme seeks not only to value the artist but also to confer upon \nthe artist a recognised employee status for him/her to rise above precarity. As such, the \nprogramme recognises how the empowered and secured artist will be key to developing the \ncultural industry as a new pillar of the economy. \nCulture is our lifeblood. Culture is our identity; culture incorporates our dynamic and \ncreative modes of engaging with our daily reality, our history and our dreams for the future. \nA thriving cultural industry is the heartthrob of a healthy society. This Programme rightly \nemphasises the much-needed expansion this industry requires to celebrate our shared culture \nand heritage. \nMadam Speaker, the Government Programme recognises the primacy of socio-\neconomic and cultural rights as identified by the treaty, the International Covenant on \nEconomic, Social and Cultural Rights that Mauritius signed on 12 December 1973. Yes, 52 \nyears later, we now have a government; we now have leaders who will honour this treaty by \nincorporating our social and economic rights in our Constitution. This is system change. \nIndeed, what we are privileged to be part of is a leadership based on care and empathy. A \nleadership that will forge a stronger nation; a nation that looks after the most vulnerable \nmembers of our society. A nation that values dignity, respect and solidarity. The very values \n\n86 \n \nthat our Prime Minister has reminded us are our empowering legacy from our history of \nenslavement.  \nThis Programme expressively stipulates that in Mauritius, the elderly, people with \ndisabilities, widows and orphans will be taken care of. This is a solemn pledge that can but \nempower us in our daily struggles to help thousands who suffer from systemic discrimination.  \nMadam Speaker, authentic leadership is about care and empathy. It is based on \nmeaningful connections with humanity as a whole. This leadership of care is exemplified by \ncareful attention paid in the Programme to a range of reforms aimed at improving the lives of \neach and every citizen. Indeed, pension reforms and the e-social security system are \nfundamental. They are concrete steps being envisaged to upgrade a system that currently \ncondemns thousands to profound misery. \nAs newly elected members of the Assembly, we are being called upon daily to respond \nto multiple cases of genuine and heartbreaking human distress. The previous system has been \nnothing but criminal; it has been cruel, deadly and monstrous. It has inflicted needless pain \nand suffering on the weakest of our citizens. This programme precisely seeks to give us the \ntools to support our most vulnerable fellow men and women. We welcome with our whole \nheart the much-required change in the social security system. We will not only care, but we \nwill act upon our care.  \nMadam Speaker, the Mauritian family has been under dire stress over the past years. \nRising costs of living, poor employment prospects, the burden of long working hours and \nchildren having no hope of the future in their homeland, as well as significant social ills, have \nmade our families frailer. \nThis Programme recognises that the family unit has to be strengthened in order for our \nsociety to stand firm and strong again. Families are the foundation of social reproduction; \nthey protect life and the future of humanity. Protecting each family is the government’s \nultimate responsibility.  \nWith regard to education, we genuinely applaud the Programme’s emphasis on \ninclusion. Our education system has long been discriminatory and elitist with systemic \nexclusion of the most vulnerable, that is, students with SEN requirements. In the recent past, \nwe have further witnessed the deliberate dismantling of the education system. Exclusion in a \ncompetitive system that is overly exam-oriented has sapped our children of the potential to \n\n87 \n \ndevelop their full intellectual abilities. It has been orchestrated, an intellectual genocide of the \ninnocent and the underprivileged.  \nInclusion, in contrast, is progress. Inclusion is ethics; inclusion is the valuing of each \nchild’s right. Inclusive education is the way forward. This government has already \ndemonstrated its dedication to implementing inclusive education by eradicating the Extended \nStream Programme. It was the prime example of how our children were being failed by a \nsystem that could not even develop their numeracy and literacy skills.  \nThis Government Programme, in addition, seeks to value teachers and their role. This \nfundamental aim can but redress the profound flaws of a system where teachers are not \nempowered to support the intellectual and holistic development of our children. Our children \nand their future can no more be sacrificed on altars of narrow policies and dysfunctional \neducational practices. Dedicated teachers change lives, forge aspirations and shape a \ncountry’s future. One of the main reasons I stand here today is because my teachers believed \nin me. With a growth mindset, teachers can make a difference for each Mauritian child. This \nis precisely what this government seeks to achieve.  \nMadam Speaker, we can similarly applaud the close attention paid to food security in \nthe Government Programme. Food security is one of the primary challenges we face due to \nthe climate crisis. Anxiety about food access during the initial phase of the COVID-19 \npandemic still lingers in our minds. Disruption of the supply chain and the rising food crisis \nresulted in mere mass psychosis. It is to the honour of this government to tackle food \ninsecurity and ensure that such traumatic lack of access to food never occurs again. Food is a \nbasic human right; it is the fundamental physiological need as defined by Maslow, without \nwhich no other need can be satisfied. A government that feeds its people and that provides \nequal access to food is a responsible and caring government. It is duty bound and driven by \ncontentious awareness about the climate crisis. It is good governance, for it bears foresight \ninto an insecure future in the Anthropocene era. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to restoring law and order, we can but breathe with relief \nthat the Prime Minister and this government are spearheading immediate and concrete action \nto battle the scourge of drugs. Madam Speaker, drugs have and are taking their toll on our \nsociety. Not a single day goes by without us witnessing the tragedies drugs entail in every \ncorner of our society. The case of baby Catalea, murdered by a neighbour under the influence \nof synthetic drugs, exemplifies the human loss we endure due to the pervasiveness of drugs \n\n88 \n \nacross the island. Drugs are killing our children, murdering our youth and incapacitating \nwhole families. They are the bane of the land and its people. \nThe Government Programme demonstrates precisely the genuine leadership required to \nbattle the scourge no matter how hard it is. Amidst various urgent significant measures stated \nin the programme, the distinction to be made between traffickers and consumers denotes the \nwillingness to take care of victims, to look after the people. This programme seeks to heal, \nsave and protect. We are thankful and hold dearly the hope that no more children shall suffer \nthe fate of Baby Catalea. May her soul rest in peace. May innocent children suffer no more. \nMadam Speaker, I thank this Government for paying due attention to improving access \nto justice, to enhancing judiciary processes and to forging public trust in the Police. The \npolice and criminal justice, as well as the Criminal Evidence Bill, will no doubt be elaborated \nwith due expertise to safeguard the public and ensure institutional efficacy. We may now \nbreathe with relief. To have faith in the judiciary and the Police is what the people have been \nhoping for with bated breath. \nThe former failures of both institutions had almost led us to the state of the Homo Sacer \nas defined by Giorgio Agamben, the state of exception where our humanity, our safety and \nour right to life were no more upheld by those in power. This Government is therefore ready \nto take on the most dire of challenges: make the island safe again. I am grateful to our \ndecision-makers who have paid due consideration to the appropriate, safe and conducive \nconditions Police Officers need to work in. \nI strongly deplore the current dilapidated state of many police stations, particularly in \nConstituency No. 8. I think particularly of women police officers who work odd hours in \nconditions where they cannot even access clean and operational bathrooms. This programme \nreflects humane and sensitive attention paid to the working conditions of Police Officers. \nThey are frontline employees and have to undertake extensive emotional labour. My \nconstituency has witnessed the worst of crimes. It is our duty to look after those who will \nhelp us seek justice. It is our duty to ensure they can perform to the best of their abilities in \nsafe and healthy conditions. \nMadam Speaker, a caring government is a government that dares take on board the \ncriminal dysfunctionalities of systems it has inherited. One such dysfunctionality of extensive \nproportions lies in the healthcare sector, where we have witnessed the tragic loss of lives of \npatients on dialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic. With the firm intention of supporting \n\n89 \n \nsubstance abuse rehabilitation, improving current mental health care and ensuring more \nadequate services to the elderly, the programme entrenches the Government’s dedication to \nproviding public health care. Free, quality public healthcare is the hallmark of a functional \nwelfare state that forges equity across our society. \nAs Margaret Mead stated – \n“Civilization is only achieved when the most vulnerable and sickly is carefully looked \nafter.” \nIndeed, this Government programme epitomises the duty of care towards us all. I am \nproud to be part of a government that further places emphasis on youth empowerment, \ndeveloping a dynamic sports sector and ensuring just access to housing. This programme \nbears in mind the precise social and economic dimensions that can empower each Mauritian, \nno matter his or her walk of life. \nTo conclude, Madam Speaker, the people rose, broke their chains and handed us the \nbeacon of light to a future of hope for each Mauritian. This programme etches a vision of \nethical governance based on care for life, nature and the land. An equal and just society is \nwhat this programme aspires to. We understand the economic challenges, but we can’t hail \nthe vision of our leaders.  \nThe drive to protect the people, redress the multiple wrongs Mauritians have been \nsubject to for years and rebuild a nation where we can all live securely, breathe freely and be \nat peace is inspiring.  \nA vision empowers. It draws from every struggle for human dignity, respect and the \nright to life. It shapes the purpose of life. It boldens our spirit to climb over mountains and \ncross rivers. A true revolutionary is guided by love for humanity, hope and a vision for its \nupliftment. I therefore call upon this august Assembly to approve this motion. C’est le plat de \nrésistance et de résilience de notre gouvernement. Merci. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you so much for your first speech. Thank you and welcome. I \nneed someone to second the Motion. \nMr Mohamed rose and seconded. \n(4.42 p.m.) \n\n90 \n \nThe Minister of Housing and Lands (Mr S. Mohamed): Thank you, Madam \nSpeaker. I would like to congratulate hon. Dr. Ms Thannoo for her maiden speech. It was \nindeed une bouffée d’air frais.  \nI am sitting down here, trying to remember what it was like not so long ago. Very often, \nwhen I am outside of this Assembly, I am told that they enjoyed it, not because the other \nSpeaker threw me out very often – I did not enjoy that very much! We were in competition, \nthe hon. Deputy Prime Minister and others; you were also there on the agenda, a lot of us \nwere – but what they do say is they are wondering how it will be different. \nMadam Speaker, allow me to say that having listened to the hon. Member address this \nAssembly, not only did she do it with a lot of quality in the content, but she did it very calmly \nby respecting this august Assembly. All those of us here can say that when we hear her, we \nunderstand why she has been up to the challenge of going to the constituency of the former \nPrime Minister and taking him on and teaching him a lesson! \nAs far as I am concerned, I find myself a bit in between those generations. When I hear \nthe hon. Member address the Assembly, when I listen to the content very attentively, I say \nthere is indeed a bright future for the future of this country when you have generations that \nare going to be taken care of by Members of Parliament of your calibre. Congratulations, \nMadam!  \nI cannot forget to mention that in 2015, I remember I found myself sitting in the second \nrow over there. The members of the MMM were also in the opposition. We were the only \nfour of the Labour Party, only four! I happened to be le chef de file of the Labour Party. Quite \nquickly, I was joined by my good friend and brother, hon. Dr. Boolell, and he allowed me to \ncontinue as a chef de file. We happened to have lived a lot of events in this House, a lot of \nevents! All those who have joined today, I feel sorry for you; you would not have lived it. It \nwas a learning experience, a learning curve. History: one day, down the road, the future \ngeneration will at least know what you must not do. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Exactement ! \nMr Mohamed: Then, watch the videos of what the former Speaker did, watch what the \nformer Prime Minister did, and watch what the ministers of the last regime did! When we \ntold them time and time again that the people out there would not forgive, they laughed at us! \nWhen we questioned them and embarrassed them, the Speaker stood up and threw us out! \nCan you imagine, Madam Speaker, when I look at the Government Programme and I look at \n\n91 \n \nthe last phrase, ‘Let Mauritius be Mauritius again’, those words mean a lot, full of meaning. \nLet Mauritius be Mauritius again! \nMauritius, I have always talked about that in my public speeches; I talked about our \nnational anthem. I even had the courage – was it a good idea or not – but I sang the national \nanthem, and then again, I thought it was quite good, but then again, when I heard myself in a \nvideo from the back, I do not believe I will change careers to adopt singing. \nWhen I sang those words, I said it to my son who was with me there, and I said to him, \n‘I will sing it’ – when I left home, I said it to him. And he looked at me before I was going to \npronounce my speech in Port Louis, and he said, ‘Dad, sing it,’ and for a minute I almost \nsaid, No, I would not. But the future generation not only understands the importance of those \nwords, but they live it; they breathe it. It is in their DNA, and this is what Mauritius is all \nabout. Let Mauritius be Mauritius again! This is what it is all about. \nToday, people can go to social media and talk against us. It is their right. It is their right \nto criticise, and we all know that they have views that we may not agree with, but it is their \nright, and look at the difference! None of those who have spoken out against us have found \nthemselves behind bars; none of them have been arrested. You have not had police officers \nlurking around your yard early in the morning, breaking cameras, blocking their numbers and \nnot wanting to be identified. You don’t have them pulling you out of your home without any \nreasonable suspicion, with no grounds for arrest. \nI remember what they did to the former Prime Minister; I remember what he did to me. \nI remember going to central CID with my then counsel, the hon. Attorney General here, \nGavin Glover. I remember the tears of my late father; I remember how they made him cry. I \nwill not forget. And when I stood in this Assembly and I said to some ministers the next day \nafter my arrest, ‘I will not forget’, but I do not come after you with revenge; I will not. I will \nnot forget, and I said to them, ‘We will put nails in your coffins – political coffins’, but they \nchose otherwise. We talk about political coffins, whereas we have seen what they do to their \npolitical agents. We cannot forget! \nLet Mauritius be Mauritius again! Where people are not assassinated for political \nreasons, there is no cover-up by politics or by police officers. Let Mauritius and every single \ndepartment of government live again and breathe again where meritocracy starts existing and \nhas meaning, not just words! And today when the hon. Prime Minister stood up and answered \n\n92 \n \nthe question from the Leader of the Opposition – I have to make reference to it – I was \nflabbergasted. \nCan you imagine what it means? What does our Constitution mean? When you have the \nPrime Minister – he used to sit opposite us there – say he stands up and he does not know or \nmaybe pretends to ignore what a sovereign democratic state is, what does democracy mean? \nWhat does sovereignty mean? What does all this mean? You do not say only words! You \nhave to understand its meaning; you have to live it. Can you imagine what it means when \nyou, somewhere, some place, conspire with others to spend more than USD 100 million in \norder to have a mass surveillance mechanism – MSM: Mass Surveillance Mechanism? \nDo you know what that means? I listened; I heard myself talking to hon. Assirvaden. \nOh yes, it was you; do not deny it! Hon. Juman was talking on it; hon. Dr. Aumeer, who is \nnot here, was on there. I heard my voice; it was my voice; it was me; I confirm it. Now, can \nyou imagine the former Prime Minister knows exactly what I thought of him? I thought it was \na secret; I thought it was a secret! And all along he knew exactly what I thought of him! \nThat’s bad! But I am happy. Can you imagine that he spends hundreds of millions of dollars? \nNot long ago in 2023, there was an enquiry being carried out in Germany. In Germany, \nthere was the whole mechanism that was put into place for mass surveillance, and the public \nprosecutor there recommended charges and prosecutions for the offence of high treason. High \ntreason means that you cannot embark upon any process to break down democracy, the very \nessence of this country. If you are trying to break down democracy, therefore destroying \ndemocracy and, in other words, controlling the country by occult means such as mass \nsurveillance systems, in certain jurisdictions, it is indeed high treason. I say it here that any \nperson, Mauritian or otherwise, who embarks upon any process to carry out mass surveillance \nof the citizens of this country is indeed guilty of high treason and should be prosecuted for \nhigh treason, but it is not for me to decide; it is my view. \nThe former government: the Prime Minister decides, the Police act – and who cared \nabout what the DPP thought? But no! I am only giving you my humble opinion. There are \nmany lawyers and colleagues here who would be able to express their views on that: is it not \nhigh treason to try to destroy democracy? What is contained in the Constitution, the right to \nprivacy – isn’t this part of democracy? When one person who is the executive decides to \nspend taxpayers’ money to eavesdrop and not only eavesdrop! Worse! He stores the \ninformation for God’s sake. \n\n93 \n \nDidn’t we talk here about ways and means that he and others talked to the \nCommissioner of Police in order to get people to say what they wanted the witnesses to say in \norder to get people arrested? Let Mauritius be Mauritius again! \nWhen I hear the hon. Duval questioning about those Missie Moustass, does it not mean \nthat he has come to realise that Mauritius indeed should be Mauritius again because he is \nsitting next to partners that he would love not to be sitting next to? \nThey tried to get him arrested for God’s sake! They tried to get him arrested. Can you \nimagine? One Dr. Joomaye calling and saying: well, you know, let’s tell him to say this; let’s \nget him to say that. No, I have gotten him, then calling another lawyer who was a candidate \nin Constituency No. 2 and telling him, oh, you know what? I have said it, you know. I have \ntold him to say so. No worries; this is going to be said, and that is going to be said. And today \nthose people think that this is their version of democracy, but the people of this country have \ndecided – you know when hon. Bhagwan said to them, ‘met to cask integral’. You see, he \nwas being very… He cared for them and made sure no part could be hurt! You see he is a \nvery caring gentleman. Integral! And one thing I learnt from him – very often when I was \nminister, he used to say to me, ‘Hey, by the way, you got your duty-free already?’ I said, \n‘Why?’ He said, ‘You won’t be in power soon!’ This is what I learnt from him, and I went to \nsay to the other friends, and you know what? They never believed us! \nThey never believed us, and I said to them, You would really fall and fall hard because \nwhat you are doing is not a crime against us. Forget about me, forget about the leader of the \nLabour Party, forget about the leader of the MMM and us. We are just mere mortals, but you \ncannot do what you are doing to the people of this land. The people will rise, and they will \npunish you!’ And it was done. \nNow, this is behind us. Unfortunately, in order to chart the course, we need to know \nwhat happened behind us. That is why I have to talk about it. You know, let me say that. I was \nthinking very carefully about the preparation of what I would say today, and I decided to go \nextempore because we have lived interesting days, sad days, and if I had to live it again, I \nwould say yes. I would live it again because it defines who you become. You see? \nI remember – I will stop talking about the past in a minute – but when I remember the \nLeader of the Labour Party being dragged from his home, Rue Desforges, they wanted to \nbreak him, but it defines what he has become, and I told him just now, at lunch – your \n\n94 \n \nvictory, this victory that you lead this alliance to as Prime Minister, will be remembered for \nthe future generations and the generations to come because in spite of all that they have done, \nhe has taught us that if you believe in one thing, stick to it, be consistent, and stand up to \nthose who try to crush you. Stand up to them! And he did it lawfully; that is the difference. \nHe did not send police officers to the home of the former Prime Minister. He did not \ncall the Police and say, ‘Get the former Governor of the Bank of Mauritius arrested; shut him \nin.’ He did not do all that. So much so, the people were asking questions about how come so-\nand-so is travelling, how come the former Prime Minister is going shopping on the Champs-\nÉlysées and on Oxford Street and carrying Chanel bags and whatnot. This is his life; let him \nlive it. But he was so concerned and obsessed with the former Prime Minister that he ensured \nthat everyone in the country could be eavesdropped on, and he was ensuring that he could \ndestroy this man, but thank God and thank the Almighty, he has not succeeded. \nI look at hon. Osman Mahomed, and there is nothing wrong, so don’t... \n(Interruptions) \nYou see, very often he speaks of Singapore. Allow me to say why I say that. He speaks of \nSingapore, and when he speaks of Singapore, he always talks about what he has learnt from \nSingapore. I know, hon. Uteem has also worked there, and therefore, is it a coincidence that \nboth of them are candidates in No. 2? No, but it is a fact that I learnt a lot from both of them; \nmaybe sometimes they have the impression that I do not listen, but I hear whatever they say, \nand I take a lot of lessons from what they say. And when they talk of Singapore, they talk \nabout the greatness of the technology in Singapore and the society in Singapore. So, this is \nhow we were talking about reform. \nA lot of people have asked me what the digital twin is. A lot of people ask. In the \nGovernment Programme, we refer to the digital twin of Mauritius. As I stand before you as \nMinister of Housing and Land today, I went to my ministry in December and asked the \nSenior Chief Executive for whom I have a lot of respect, as well as the officers there, to show \nme a map of Mauritius. I wanted to see a map, a virtual digital map whereby I would be able \nto identify. I asked them to show me which land belongs to the State, which land belongs to \nthe private sector, which land is environmentally sensitive, and which land is flood-prone. I \nasked them to give me all the data. \n\n95 \n \nUnfortunately, there are a lot of platforms, but none of the platforms could give me \nwhat I was looking for, and it hit me that I met certain very important individuals; I say \nimportant because I admire their intelligence, and they are important people to me – those \nwho have a lot of intelligence, those who do not talk for the sake of talking but talk sense. \nThose people at the Economic Development Board told me that there is something called the \nDigital Twin that was implemented in Singapore, and this is what this government will \nembark upon implementing. It is, in fact, digitalising Mauritius, the whole of Mauritius, and \nusing it as an urban planning tool. \nImagine the future; let me take you to this future through my words. Imagine a future \nwhere you do not have to send land surveyors out there to measure the topography. You have \na platform at the Ministry of Housing and Land. In that electronic tool, that digital tool, you \nwill have a digitalised Mauritius. The Ministry of Environment will be able to share data on \nthat platform as to what are environmentally sensitive areas. We will have information from \nthe Ministry of Transport; we will have information from the Ministry of Infrastructure, the \nMinistry of Tourism, all relevant ministries, and the Prime Minister’s Office. We will have \ninformation about the Safe City Cameras, so much so that if someone wants to apply for a \nBLUP, he will simply have to apply for one electronically; he will have access to the digital \nMauritius as well. We will simply plug in the format of the building he wants to put up, and \nyou will see the virtual building immediately pop up. And we will know, using artificial \nintelligence on that platform, with all the data, including on that platform, disaster \nmanagement will be able to be catered for. We will know what traffic will be like in the 1, 2, \n3, 5, 10 years to come. We will know what electricity will be required and what water will be \nrequired. We will know everything we need to know in order to plan a smart Mauritius. \nThis is going to be a legacy project, and I have embarked upon this, and I know I can \ncount upon the help and collaboration of all my colleague ministers, backbenchers and junior \nministers for us to be able to move forward and stop working in silos. And that has been the \nbig problem. A lot of our administration in Mauritius is such that whatever information the \nMinistry of Agro-Industry will have; the Ministry of Housing will not necessarily have it. \nWhatever information I have at Housing, you do not necessarily have it at the Environment, \nand we go on like that. We have to be able to have all information without any silos and be \ncollaborative on one platform to plan a smarter Mauritius, and this is what we are embarking \nupon. Singapore has done it. So much so, Singapore today can know everyone. \n\n96 \n \nAccess to information – this is what this government is all about. Not only will the \ngovernment be able to hold the information close to its chest, but it will also be able to have \nit; maybe a subscription form, maybe in a different format, but we will be able to sell this \ndata or share this data with members of the public in order to build a new Mauritius. Gone are \nthe days where you do not have proper planning, and since I am talking about planning, \nMadam Speaker, let me say that there are two planning legislations regulating land \ndevelopment in Mauritius. \nThe Town and Country Planning Act of 1954 and the partly proclaimed Planning and \nDevelopment Act of 2004. These laws, Madam Speaker, work together to guide land use \nplanning, but the Town and Country Planning Act of 1954 has become outdated and does not \nfully address modern land use challenges. Efforts to update that piece of legislation, including \nthe passing of new Acts in 1990 and 1995, have been unsuccessful. While the Planning and \nDevelopment Act of 2004 was intended to replace the Town and Country Planning Act, it \ncould not be fully implemented due to changes in other laws, such as the Business \nFacilitation and Local Government Acts. Additionally, the Town and Country Planning Act of \n1954 appellate function was transferred to the Environment and Land Use Appeal Tribunal of \n2012, a real mess. \nSo finally, we need to put some order in all this, and I will be working very closely with \nmy learnt colleague, the hon. Attorney General, and his office in order to achieve this. There \nis a need to align the legal framework for the preparation and approval of all planning \ninstruments. The current framework for the outline planning scheme has often been \nchallenged in court, with one of the most recent cases being Beaux Songes Development v/s \nUBP, decided by the Privy Council in 2018. Now, this situation has impacted environmentally \nsensitive areas, for example, Pomponette and La Cambuse. Loopholes and inconsistencies \nsaved promoters from being unable to bypass certain parameters. \nThere is another issue I would like to address, Madam Speaker, and it is as follows. \nThis is a challenge that we will have to decide and deal with at the level of government. Back \nin 2017, everyone will remember and try to recall – let us go through the full exercise – who \nwas Minister of Finance in 2017? Anyone will recall? Who? Yes, him. Call him by his name! \nSo, when he was Minister of Finance in 2017, the big question we have right now is access to \nland. Not only have we heard questions about access to social housing this morning, but think \n\n97 \n \nabout all the Pas Géométriques and state lands around Mauritius that a lot of promoters are \nafter. That is a fact! \nSo, as a country, we are at the junction right now, and we will have to decide where we \nstand. Yes, there is a need to have foreign direct investment coming to Mauritius, and there \nare various ways and means for it to come in. One of them is through the sale of property to \nforeigners. One of them. In 2017, the Ministry of Finance wrote a letter to the Managing \nDirector of the Board of Investment whereby it referred to the apprehensions of the Economic \nDevelopment Board. The Economic Development Board was against the scheme put up by \nthe then government to sell state lands. They devised ways and means to facilitate the selling \nof state lands to foreigners. For example, you have promoters who come in, they convert their \nlease, campement, and then they have the right to sell to foreigners as though it is behind the \nwhole idea of a co-propriété. \nWhen one listens to people of this country speaking, one of the issues they are \npreoccupied about is as follows. Yes, it brings in revenue. I have had some facts, and I will \nshare them with the House. It brings in revenue, but at what price? You see, let us look at it \nthis way. When I look at the facts, between 2017 and January 2025, the EDB was in receipt \nof 1,230 applications for acquisition of ground plus 2 residential apartments by non-citizens. \nThe gross value of these applications – 19.6 billion. That is the record of the EDB. \nOut of these applications over that period, 144 were in relation to an apartment, part of \na residential development situated over state land, Pas Géométriques, with coastal frontage. \nThe value of these applications grossly amounts to 4.1 billion. The status of these 144 \napplications: 75 applications approved, having a gross value of 1.79 billion. Out of the 75 \nauthorised transactions, 61 were concluded for an amount of 1.256 million as per records of \nthe EDB. \nSo, the issue is, yes. What is the rental per arpent? Between 390,000 and one million. \nYes, you get money in terms of registration or land transfer, but at the end of the day, when \nyou have apartments selling for 1.5 million euros or 2 million euros bought by foreigners, \nthat does create a disbalance with regard to the price of property and accessibility for \nMauritians. So, finally, I was, myself, walking on the north coast – that is strange enough. I \nnever thought I would become Minister of Housing and Lands. Thank you, hon. Prime \nMinister – I wanted to rent out a property because – I will share it; we are all family – my \n\n98 \n \nsister-in-law is coming, and I wanted to make her spend a nice time at the beach and find a \nnice property on the beach. I stood before a building on the Pas Géométriques, and I found an \nexcellent property. \nWhen I was there one night having dinner with her, I managed to speak to the \nwatchman. I often do that, and you learn a lot of things. The Prime Minister taught me that if \nyou speak to the person on the ground, you will learn more. And I learnt a lot. I learnt that the \nwhole building was owned by foreigners on Pas Géométriques. The north coast, all of it, is \nowned by foreigners. So, the job of my ministry, therefore, with the help of my colleagues, \nwill be to decide as a balancing exercise: are we, in the name, ready to sell the whole \nproperty, the country, to foreigners? Then, we all end up being what? We will have to rent \nout to be able to enjoy a frontage? That is the problem. \nSo, let me conclude, Madam Speaker, by saying that I am indeed in a very important \nposition, I admit. Once upon a time, this position was occupied by my late grandfather. I must \nsay that la barre is very high, very high indeed because not only did he, at one point in time, \ncarry out and implement measures that are still today helping the country. But the expectation \nof the Prime Minister for each of us, his Ministers, Members of Parliament, Junior Ministers \nand backbenchers is indeed very high because the people out there expect us to provide \nsolutions to the wrongs of the past. \nSo, yes, NHDC and NSLD will be reviewed and reformed. Social justice for social \nhousing. My friends will have the opportunity of putting questions on those matters which I \nwill gladly answer, and I will enlighten the House on all development as we go along. \nHowever, why I chose to speak about this issue of foreigners – we have nothing against \nforeigners, clearly – but somewhere, some place, we have to brainstorm because we do not \nwant Mauritians to end up being lokater in their own country. That is not the aim of this \ngovernment. I am certain. \nThank you very much, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister for raising some very important issues for \nthe benefit of the people.  \nI wanted to say that, in fact, before you spoke, we were to have hon. A. Duval speak. \nBut I want to make it quite clear to everybody that he decided not to speak for whatever \n\n99 \n \npersonal reasons. It is not that I have asked him not to speak. He was to speak, in fact, before \nyou. I thank you. \nI think we can break for tea. I was going to say 30 minutes. 40 minutes? I think we need \na bit of rest, and then we will have fresh ideas. So, we will be back here in about 30 minutes.  \nAt 5.14 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.50 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Members, please be seated! \nYes, hon. Etwareea, you have the floor! \nMr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand'Baie & Poudre d'Or) : J’ai adoré le \nregard dans les rétroviseurs de l’honorable Shakeel Mohamed juste avant. J’ai adoré \ncomment il a lancé le débat autour de la place de la promotion immobilière pour la croissance \nde l’île. J’ai apprécié l’hommage qu’il a rendu au Premier ministre, surtout à sa résilience.  \nÀ mon tour de rendre hommage à l’honorable Paul Bérenger. Très personnellement, je \ndois ma carrière à Port-Louis, à Genève, puis à Bruxelles, et maintenant cette place à \nl’Assemblée législative, grâce à lui. Je parle d’un travailleur infatigable, rigoureux, percutant. \nJe parle d’un intellectuel accompli, d’un homme de conviction ayant un sens profond de \nl’humain et de justice sociale. C’est un historien avec une grande compréhension des \nrelations internationales. Je me souviens lorsqu’il nous parlait déjà à l’époque du taux repo, \nde l’OTAN et de programmes d’ajustement structurel du FMI. \nIl a fait face à des vents contraires, à des trahisons, à des retournements de veste, il a \npersévéré et, comme le Premier ministre actuel, il est là alors que ses détracteurs se trouvent \ndans Karo Kann, comme on aime bien le dire. Il a inspiré plusieurs générations d’hommes et \nde femmes politiques, dont moi. Travailler avec lui au Parlement aujourd’hui, mais aussi au \nsein du Mouvement militant mauricien, membre de l’Alliance pour le changement, est un \nprivilège. Je suis tout aussi heureux de siéger ici aux côtés du leader de cette alliance à qui je \nrends également hommage. \nPour ce discours inaugural, je ne peux pas oublier feu mes parents et toute ma famille \nqui ont relevé avec moi les défis de ces dernières élections. Je leur exprime ici mon immense \nreconnaissance, tout comme aux électeurs de la circonscription Grand Baie/Poudre d'Or où \n57 % de l’électorat a donné un magistral coup de pied à un régime MSM décadent et pourri \n\n100 \n \ndont les intérêts personnels de ses dirigeants comptaient davantage que ceux du pays. Il fallait \navoir du toupet pour dire qu’il y avait un feel-good factor dans le pays alors même que, \ncomme aujourd’hui encore, l’eau courante n’est pas accessible à de nombreuses familles à \nGrand Gaube ou à Grand Baie ; qu’un blackout pend comme l’épée de Damoclès sur la tête \nde la population à Goodlands, à Roche Terre et en réalité sur tout le pays ; que les transports \nen commun inefficaces laissent des centaines de passagers sous des arrêts d’autobus à \nMelville, à Madame Azor ou à Cap Malheureux. \nM. le président, je me retrouve parfaitement dans le discours du programme présenté \nl’autre jour par le président de la République. Je n’ai donc aucune hésitation à soutenir le vote \nde remerciements présenté par notre amie et collègue, l’honorable Babita Thannoo, il y a un \ninstant. Même la bourse mauricienne a salué le programme du gouvernement, et puis les \nindices boursiers ont augmenté à Maurice alors que les principales places financières dans le \nmonde ont cédé leur position la semaine passée. \nLe programme présenté l’autre jour fait une place prépondérante à l’économie bleue. \nEffectivement, le pays a besoin d’un nouveau pôle de croissance. Une industrie de la pêche se \nreposant sur la technologie et des infrastructures modernes a un potentiel énorme en termes \nde création d’emplois et de richesses. Le poisson remplace graduellement la viande dans nos \nassiettes et devient la principale source de protéine pour un nombre croissant de la population \ndans le monde, mais également à Maurice. Sa demande est telle que l’aquaculture a pris le \ndessus sur le poisson pêché de façon industrielle ou artisanale depuis une dizaine d’années. \nEn 2019, les exportations mondiales des produits de la pêche et de l’aquaculture ont été \névaluées à 161 milliards de dollars, soit environ 11 % des exportations des produits de la mer. \nÀ titre de comparaison, le PIB mauricien ne pèse que 14 milliards de dollars. Les \nexportations mauriciennes de poisson s’élèvent à un maigre 20 millions de dollars, autant dire \nqu’il y a du pain sur la mer. \nL’ensemble de l’économie bleue pèsera, selon le CDE, 3000 milliards de dollars par an \nà partir de 2030. Avec une zone maritime de plus de 2 millions de kilomètres carrés, nous \ndevrions en toute logique pouvoir croquer notre part de poisson. \nOn a beaucoup parlé de la pêche durant ces dernières années, on a beaucoup parlé dans \nle programme. La pêche, l’industrie de la pêche, apparait plusieurs fois dans le discours du \nprésident. J’ai confiance que, maintenant, les dés sont jetés, que la volonté politique est là. \n\n101 \n \nEt en même temps, M. le président, j’aimerais que le gouvernement porte une attention \nparticulière aux accords de pêche que nous avons signés avec nos différents partenaires, qui \nleur donnent un droit de pêche dans nos zones maritimes. Trop souvent, nos ressources \nhalieutiques sont pillées par ces puissances étrangères. Et trop souvent, ces accords sont \nsignés, sont négociés en toute opacité et la population ignore totalement les enjeux, \nnotamment financiers. Victimes de la surpêche et de la concurrence déloyale de pêcheurs \nétrangers, les pêcheurs de Grand Gaube, Grand Baie, au fait de toute l’île, doivent aller \ntoujours plus loin dans la mer pour garantir une prise qui n’est jamais garantie. Nous sommes \nun importateur de poisson avec 2 millions de kilomètres carrés de zones maritimes. Nous ne \nsommes pas autosuffisants en produits de mer. \nM. le président, je pense plus particulièrement à l’accord de pêche signé avec l’Union \neuropéenne. Vous savez, après avoir raclé leur propre mer, les pêcheurs européens sont \nautour de l’Afrique et de l’océan Indien. Ils imposent déjà des accords de pêche contre les \nprogrammes de coopération technique avec nos pays. Nous devrions savoir ce que nous \nrapportent ces contrats. Profitent-ils vraiment aux pêcheurs qui sont les premiers concernés ? \nLa transparence concerne, au niveau de la pêche, la pêche qui doit devenir une industrie \nimportante chez nous. \nPoursuivons. Le programme fait la part belle aux secteurs agricoles. De la même façon, \nnous sommes un pays agricole et nous devons importer beaucoup de vivres. M. le président, \ndans le programme au menu, une agro-industrie moderne est en ligne de mire, une meilleure \nsécurité alimentaire. J’aimerais attirer votre attention et l’attention de la Chambre sur ces \nmilliers de lopins de terre abandonnés aux quatre coins de l’île. Un cadre du ministère de \nl’agriculture a pris le temps et le plaisir aussi d’estimer qu’une surface d’environ 5000 \narpents, peut-être que cela ne nous parle pas de ce que ça veut dire, mais c’est à peu près 10 \nfois la taille d’une ville comme Rose Hill, est laissée aux mauvaises herbes ou transformée en \ndéchetterie. Nous connaissons les raisons de cet abandon : taille marginale de ces parcelles, \naucune garantie de rentabilité, pénurie de main-d’œuvre. \nC’est paradoxal que nous importions des vivres comme la pomme de terre, l’oignon, de \nl’ail alors que de larges surfaces sont abandonnées. Renversons, M. le président, la tendance \nen créant des conditions cadres pour ramener les familles d’agriculteurs dans les champs, \npour encourager les coopératives : achat des semences et d’intrants groupés et prix garanti à \nla vente, prêts bancaires facilités. \n\n102 \n \nM. le président, le programme met l’emphase sur une croissance qui repose sur des \ninvestissements, sur une productivité accrue et appelle à la diversification économique, mais \nla planification économique devra aussi mettre la question de la main-d’œuvre, qualifiée ou \nnon qualifiée, à l’agenda. Ce n’est un secret pour personne que des entrepreneurs de tous les \nsecteurs vivent le cauchemar de la pénurie de main-d’œuvre. Faute de bras et de cerveaux, \ndes entreprises sont contraintes de réduire les activités. Dans un contexte de pénurie mondiale \nde main-d’œuvre, la situation ne va pas s’améliorer chez nous. \nM. le président, dans l’immédiat et à court terme, nous colmatons les brèches en \nimportant des Bangladais, des Malgaches et autres travailleurs. À long terme, il nous faudra \npasser à autre chose.  \nMerci pour votre attention.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Can I now call upon hon. Beechook on the floor. \n(6.01 p.m.) \nMr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil): Mr Deputy Speaker, \nSir, I stand before you today to commend your election and the election of Madam Speaker \nas the beacon of this 8th National Assembly of the Republic of Mauritius. Your appointment \nsymbolises the dawn of an era where the people’s desire for change in the conduct of the \nmatters of this House is finally realised. This hallowed hall of democracy now regains the \nsolemnity it once held, deserving once again to be called an august Assembly.  \nGone are the days of the loudspeaker’s relentless barrage, assaulting the ears of our \nhonourable members. No longer will the menacing index finger haunt this House, a sordid \nfinger that once loomed like a razor-sharp finger knife haunts in the darkest kitchen of our \nnation’s history; la fameuse Lakwizinn poised to silence the legitimate voices raised in this \nAssembly, but now, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, and under the guidance of Madam Speaker, we \ncan look forward to a future where the voices of the people are heard and respected. And \nwhere the true spirit of democracy can flourish. The enlightened people of Mauritius, le \npeuple admirable comme le dit si bien l’honorable Paul Bérenger, have buried the \nloudspeaker not in the dustbin, but in the Mare Chicose of history et même Mare Chicose ne \nvoulait pas de lui. Elle s’est immolée pour ne pas engloutir cette nouvelle espèce d’ordure \ntoxique pour la démocratie.  \nM. le président, avant de poursuivre mon discours, je saisis cette occasion pour \nexprimer ma profonde gratitude. D’abord au Premier ministre et leader de l’Alliance du \n\n103 \n \nChangement pour m’avoir accordé l’investiture dans cette élection qui n’était ni plus ni \nmoins qu’une noble lutte pour notre deuxième indépendance. Comme l'a dit Nelson Mandela, \nla liberté ne peut être atteinte que par ceux qui sont prêts à être des champions de la cause de \nla liberté. \nEnsuite, j’exprime ma reconnaissance envers les électeurs de la circonscription no 9, \nFlacq-Bon Accueil, qui m’ont honoré de leur confiance avec 27 605 votes lors des dernières \nlégislatives. Je vous suis éternellement reconnaissant. Enfin, je rends hommage à ma famille, \nà mes proches, à mes amis, à mes deux colistiers et à mes bienfaiteurs qui m’ont soutenu \nlorsque je n’étais personne. Plus particulièrement, je dédie cette reconnaissance à mon ange \ngardien, mon défunt père, qui, malgré nos modestes origines familiales, rêvait toujours que je \ndevienne un jour parlementaire. Merci papa. Ce discours est un hommage à tous ceux et \ncelles qui ont cru en moi et qui ont contribué à ce moment qui m’est historique. \nM. le président, à peine Son Excellence, le Président de la République, Dharambeer \nGokhool, avait entamé la lecture éloquente de son discours-programme intitulé ‘Un pont vers \nl’avenir’ que je ne pouvais m’empêcher d’imaginer ce pont de l’avenir. C’est précisément sur \nce pont que repose le poids de l’espoir du peuple mauricien qui a renversé le MSM et ses \nacolytes lors des législatives du 10 novembre dernier. La colère du peuple s’est transformée \nen une force puissante comparable à celle d’un Kärcher pour nettoyer ce pays de la cohorte \nd’incompétents qui nous gouvernait depuis 10 ans. \nL’héritage du MSM se compare à ses piliers en bois du pont vers l’avenir infesté de \ntermites orange. Ce n’est pas une coïncidence. Éternellement affamés, extérieurement solides, \nses piliers sont en réalité évidés et fragilisés. Ses piliers fragiles reposent sur un chantier en \nruine, honteusement masqués par des mensonges à répétition. Ils ont menti de manière \nrépétitive, même ici, dans ce temple de la démocratie. Quelles pitreries le Premier ministre \nsortant et son ministre des Finances n’ont-ils pas proférées ici. La dernière en date : je laisse \nderrière moi une assise solide, c’est à mourir de honte. Je dirais même que c’est à dounker de \nhonte. En voici quelques exemples :  Le produit intérieur brut (PIB) a été artificiellement \ngonflé de 5,6  % en 2023 et de 6,5  % en 2024. \nNotre chère roupie a perdu 46 % de sa valeur face au dollar américain, entraînant une \nflambée vertigineuse du coût de la vie. L’inflation a obéré le budget des ménages comme \njamais auparavant. Les produits essentiels, tels que la sardine, manze mizer, manze dimounn \npov, nourriture des plus démunis, sont passés de R 12 à R 32 sous le MSM. Une boîte de \n\n104 \n \nGlenrick est passée de R 42 à R 112. Notre fameux fromage cheddar Kraft est passé de R 47 \nà R 101,40. Enfin, M. le président, notre cher corned mutton, Watsonia si par malheur le \nMSM était resté au pouvoir, croyez-moi, aurait dû être acheté non pas au supermarché, mais \nchez le bijoutier. \nLes Mauriciens l’auraient rangé non pas dans leurs buffets, mais dans l’argentier de \nleurs salons. Le corned mutton est passé de R 72 à R 174,41, soit une augmentation, tenez-\nvous bien, de 381 %. Pour terminer avec ce bal de mensonges du MSM, comment pouvais-je \nfaire l’impasse sur ce qu’ils ont fait de la Banque de Maurice ? Une abomination ! De joyau \nde notre économie, le MSM a transformé notre banque centrale en planche à billets pour \ntantôt financer son budget, tantôt remplir sa dette, et tantôt la convertir en ATM, guichets \nautomatiques pour distribuer de l’argent aux petits copains de la cuisine, tels que Pulse \nAnalytics, l’éternel Maradiva, Ambre et tant d’autres. Ce programme gouvernemental vient \nrendre ses lettres de noblesse à la Banque de Maurice. \nVoilà comment le vampire MSM a sucé le sang des ménages mauriciens. Winston \nChurchill l’avait si bien dit : le courage, c’est d’aller de l’avant malgré la peur. C’est pour \ncela, M. le président, qu’il faut saluer l’audace, l’ingéniosité et le courage de ce \ngouvernement. Un gouvernement intrépide qui, bravant ce chantier de ruine, nous a gratifié \nd’un programme de gouvernement 2025-2029 qui s’attaque astucieusement non seulement \naux problèmes urgents, mais qui englobe une vision ambitieuse à moyen et long terme.  \nJ’aimerais également saluer le leadership de cette alliance. Permettez-moi de préciser : \nqu’est-ce qu’on n’a pas dit du Premier ministre et du Premier ministre adjoint ? On les a \ntraînés dans la boue, mais nous avons en face de nous deux personnes, si vous me permettez, \nl’honorable Bérenger, l’un a vaincu un cancer, l’autre a vaincu le COVID. Certes, pour une \nraison, pour une cause. Et cette cause, justement, c’était pour sauver la patrie, pour sauver ce \npays ! \nIl y a un proverbe en mi-punjabi et en hindi qui dit : Jako rakhe saiyan, maar sake na \nkoi. Si Dieu est de votre côté, rien ne peut vous arriver. Et c’est justement la voix du peuple, \nsoit la voix de Dieu, qui a fait de l’un le Premier ministre et de l’autre le Premier ministre \nadjoint. M. le président, ce programme de gouvernement est fondé sur une idéologie solide. Il \ndit la vérité au peuple. Ce n’est pas un assemblage de mesures superficielles comme l’étaient \nles deux précédents programmes sous le règne du MSM. \n\n105 \n \nCe programme concerne sérieusement l’avenir des générations à venir. Pour ce débat, je \nme suis appesanti sur le thème de la prospérité, qui, même si elle n’est pas explicitement \nmentionnée dans le discours programme, en est le cœur. La prospérité, barakat, comme on le \ndit chez nous à la campagne. C’est la jauge pour évaluer le bonheur, le progrès, la joie et la \nsatisfaction dans le cheminement de la vie. Ce programme vise à rétablir la notion de \nprospérité qui est si chère. Avec votre permission, si je peux continuer… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Sorry, I have been made to understand that there is an agreement \nbetween hon. Members that backbenchers will have 10 minutes and the Ministers will have \n20 minutes. So, I do not want to stop you, but please… \nMr Beechook: No, it is fine. \nThe Deputy Speaker: …try to abide by the agreement that you have reached. Thank \nyou. \nMr Beechook: M. le président, je terminerai cet exposé en disant qu’on aura réussi à la \nfin de ce mandat sur tous les plans, mais si on rate, si nous ne gagnons pas la guerre face à \ncette nébuleuse du trafic de stupéfiants, si nous ne renforçons pas la lutte contre la \ntoxicomanie pour sauver les enfants de notre République, on aura échoué sur tous les plans. \nCe même peuple qui nous porte aujourd’hui dans son cœur, dans son estime, ne nous le \npardonnera jamais.  \nOn ne peut pas se permettre d’avoir deux millions de touristes d’un côté et des enfants \nde la République drogués gisants au même sol par ici et par là. Dans l’île Maurice moderne et \nprospère que nous ambitionnons tous de bâtir au gré du travail et au prix de notre sacrifice, on \nne peut plus continuer avec cette culture d’impunité made by MSM face aux diaboliques \ntrafiquants de drogue aux aguets. \nJe suis certain, M. le président, qu’ensemble, nous vaincrons as one people as one \nnation. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Jhummun! \n(6.15 p.m.) \nMr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac): Thank \nyou, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Let me from the very outset thank everyone here for their \ncontribution towards the overwhelming, yet anticipated, victory in the last general elections. \nWhile each of us did contribute to that victory, we cannot undermine the fact that the hon. \n\n106 \n \nPrime Minister and Leader of the Labour Party was the architect, firstly in constituting the \nAlliance du Changement, and secondly, in driving us all towards that end. \nWhile some were sceptical, he knew what he was doing. Without any dint of doubt, we \nall believed that he was l’homme de la situation. M. le président, I would like to thank the \nLeader of the Labour Party, hon. Dr. Navin Ramgoolam, for having given me the opportunity \nto represent Constituency No. 13 and to serve the country. My parents brought me up; you \nbrought me here, and I will always be grateful to you. \nOf course, my journey from a sugar camp to this august Assembly would not have been \npossible without free education. So, I salute chacha Ramgoolam for the game-changing \ninitiative since the 1970s. \nM. le président, we are often told that grand est celui qui se tombe et se relève. My \nmessage to the newly elected members, including me, is this: when doubts haunt you, when \ndisappointment stares you in the face and you see not one ray of hope on the horizon, think of \nthe dominer endured by the Leader of the Labour Party, and immediately, you will begin to \nfeel stronger in the midst of overwhelming sorrow that you may be. I have never seen \nsomeone so brave, bold and daring. The saying goes, When the going gets tough, the tough \nget going, and you are the toughest of all, Sir. However, at the same time, this reminds us that \nnothing is permanent in life; la roue finit par tourner. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I used to tell my students that when we are in a predicament, \nwe need to ask three questions: first, where are we now? Second, where do we want to be? \nAnd third, how do we reach there? So, I will stick to this paradigm. Where are we now? I will \nbe neither pessimistic nor optimistic but rather realistic in saying that never in the history of \nthis country has so much harm been done in so little time. If you go through the PESTEL \nmodel – politically, economically, socially, technologically, environmentally and even legally \n– they have failed lamentablement in all fronts. \nI do not want to get too technical, but the document State of the Economy, published on \n10 December 2024 and presented by the hon. Prime Minister, gave a true picture of where we \nare now. Mismanagement of the economic affairs of the country like never before led to low \neconomic growth, the weakest rupee ever against the USD, and a trade deficit that stood very \nhigh; inflation peaked, fuelled by the continuous depreciation of the rupee vis-à-vis the USD. \nRegarding unemployment, there is a mismatch between the competencies and job \nvacancies with a serious problem of underemployment and disguised unemployment. Where \n\n107 \n \nare we now? M. le president, as of last year, the public sector debt stood at nearly Rs560 \nbillion, representing approximately 84% of our GDP. This means that we are living beyond \nour means. In other words, we are living dangerously. This is the legacy of the previous \ngovernment upon us, our children and yet-to-be-born ones. The MSM-led government \nfavoured politically congruent policies over economically correct ones, and this was the \nperfect recipe for their failure. \nM. le président, le comble dans tout cela, c’est qu’ils osent dire : a kot monn fote. The \nmost infamous phrase in the Mauritian context, a kot tonn fote? I just hope that they are \nlistening to us. You failed by the postponement of municipal elections, killing democracy and \ninstilling a culture of despotism – we just witnessed the Moustass Leaks under your \ngovernment, and this boomeranged upon them. You failed by allowing the rupee to \ndepreciate, prices to rise, and not reducing petrol prices even though there was public outcry. \nYou failed by dilapidating public money and the reserves of the central bank. \nPour reprendre la phrase du DPM, l’honorable Paul Bérenger, ils sont partis avec la \ncaisse, and you say a kot noun fote? You have failed to ensure regular water supply. You \npromised 24/7, not us; you failed to prevent flooding even though billions of public money \nwere spent on drains; you failed to give houses even though you promised 8000 houses to the \npoor, and you dare to say a kot zot inn fote. They failed in the case of Wakashio, which was \nan environmental disaster; they failed during COVID-19, where they made millions on the \nback of a helpless population with the infamous scandal of Pack & Blister, Molnupiravir, and \nHyperpharm, to mention a few. M. le président, they failed to kass lerin mafia la drog \ninstead, more drugs were entering the country than ever before. They failed to restore law and \norder and to get the trust and confidence of the population. Instead, people started to mistrust \nthe very institution which is there to protect them, the Police Force. \nSurtout le Striking Team, which instils a climat de terreur in the country. They failed \nbecause of their mismanagement; many public bodies and institutions ended up in precarious \nfinancial situations – I will mention STC, CEB, METRO, CWA, Air Mauritius, and the \nCasino of Mauritius. I remember once a former Prime Minister said, it is the only country in \nthe world where casinos are making losses, and they did make losses for the last 10 years. \nM. le président, on ne peut pas oublier le cas de Betamax, BAI, Patel Engineering, \nSilver Bank and même la State Bank. All these cost billions of public money, and you are all \naware there is no such thing as state money; there is only public money. It is our money that \n\n108 \n \nthey have dilapidated. They failed because they did everything to kill horse racing in \nMauritius, to kill the MTC and to protect their biggest stakeholder, which is known to \neveryone. \nM. le président, never in the history of this country has so much harm been done to the \neducational sector in so little time. It is a pity today to see what they have done to free \neducation, which was the greatest gift from SSR to this nation. With the extended \nprogrammes, where less than 4% – yes, 4 out of 100 only – made it to the mainstream. On \none hand, we have academies and co-education; on the other hand, we have regional schools \nwhere there are only boys or girls. We are indeed in a real mess. Le collège Royal de \nCurepipe, de Port Louis, le QEC et le collège Dr Maurice Curé, jadis une fierté, sont \naujourd’hui méconnaissables. \nM. le président, due to time constraint, I know, it is not possible to go to all the frasques \nof the previous government, like honourable, my good friend, Rajesh Bhagwan, whimsically \nsaid that they will have to move with helmets to protect themselves. But my friend, let me tell \nyou that Mauritians are nice people; they will not throw stones. Instead, the Mauritians did an \nextraordinary thing in an extraordinary way when they all went out with their pen, s’il vous \nplait, and sanctioned the previous government. \nIt is commonly said that in politics you can fool some of the people all the time, all the \npeople some of the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time. So, the writings were \non the wall, and this is what happened. Heureusement pour nous, M. le Premier ministre, \ngrâce à vos efforts ces derniers temps, Moody's a donné la note Baa3 investment grade, mais \nbien sûr avec des avertissements. \nWhere do we want to go? This is spelt out in the Government Programme 2025-2029: \nA Bridge to the Future. A cursory glance at the document will give an idea of the new \neconomic model and new social order we are planning to have in order to shape a new \ndestiny for our country. It is there for everyone who wants to consult, and it has already been \nscrutinised by my colleagues. It is very concise and limits itself to the essentials; it could not \nhave been better given the precarious state of the economy. \nM. le président, where do we want to go? Business as usual is no more an option; only \nfools expect different results by doing more of the same. We are not foolish. The fools have \nbeen ‘collected’ – pour reprendre ce que le loudspeaker avait dit, ‘collect this man’ – and \n\n109 \n \ntaken, as my friend just said, to Mare Chicose, and two months before, the loudspeaker went \nthere to inspect Mare Chicose, and today he is a sirdar, there inspecting these. \nWhat we need, M. le président, je vais terminer, is an independent central bank with \nclear monetary policy objectives and economic imperatives, not the one like under the \nprevious government which was at the mercy of the Minister of Finance. We need \ndiversification, diversification and diversification. This is the way forward. We need the right \nbalance between equity and efficiency. Pay raises are very important, but people must be \nencouraged to earn their income; they have to be productivity-based. We have to promote \nproductivity and not passivity. To prevent brain-drain, la meritocratie doit primer. We must \nget rid of nepotism and put the right man in the right place, such as for the Speaker, the \nDeputy Speaker, the Attorney General, and the Governor of the Central Bank, to mention a \nfew. \nProcurement and tender exercises have to be made more transparent. Use of \ninformation technology can be very useful. Education is the key to success. We can say that it \nis now in safe hands. However, the present system is doing more harm than good. We need a \ngradual phasing out of the academies in their present form. Either co-education is good or it \nis bad. We need uniformity for all colleges, not two systems within the same system. \nWhile we are in favour of three credits to promote to HSC, we must not kill elitism, \nwhich holds our future. We cannot do without discipline, discipline and discipline. Yes, M. le \nprésident, fostering a positive environment in schools and creating safe, inclusive, supportive \nand fair school climates call for maintaining a high level of discipline both inside and outside \nschools. It has never been so good to be young as it is today. Youngsters never had it so good. \nYet, they are making a misuse of the internet, mobile phones and social media. \nM. le président, je vais terminer… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, please! \nMr Jhummun: On ne peut pas être enceinte à moitié ! Soit on l’est, soit on ne l’est \npas ! We cannot stay on the fence; we cannot play safe. We need bold, firm actions against \nindiscipline and the use of mobile phones on school premises! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Okay. \n\n110 \n \nMr Jhummun: Je vais terminer… \n(Interruptions) \nJe voudrais faire une petite remarque. During our school days, we were given bread, \ncheese, milk and dried fruits. Today, our kids are only served a dipin sek. This is food for \nthought for everyone. I am just asking whether it is not high time to give a full meal only to \nthose in need. If we know it really, if we mean what is inclusion, we want to move from \nsocial exclusion to social integration. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay. I give you another 30 seconds. \nMr Jhummun: I conclude. I conclude, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. \nMr Jhummun: So, to conclude… \nThe Deputy Speaker: 30 seconds. \nMr Jhummun: So, to conclude, I do not believe in half-full or half-empty glass \ntheories. I believe in either full or empty glasses. The previous government emptied our \nglasses to the lees. Our government and particularly our Prime Minister has the daunting task \nof filling them so that the people of this country lead a fulfilling life; I would even say \nfulfilling days. \nThe purpose of this government, which has been massively supported by the people, is \nto be a government full of purpose for the people. I would reiterate what my friends said – \nLet Mauritius be Mauritius again. Long live Mauritius! \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you, hon. Member. Hon. Narsinghen, you have the floor! \n(6.30 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International \nTrade (Mr H. Narsinghen): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, first of all, I would like to thank the \n\n111 \n \npeople of Mauritius, especially the voters of No. 13, for their trust and support. At the same \ntime, I would like to thank the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Labour Party, hon. Navin \nRamgoolam, for his unwavering trust and the Leaders of the Alliance du Changement, \nespecially hon. Paul Raymond Bérenger but also Mr Richard Duval and Ashok Subron for \ntheir team spirit and commitment, and also all the MPs and multiple collaborators who helped \nus during the electoral campaign. My thanks also go to my family, especially my wife and my \nlate father, who was more passionate than me about politics. \nAll the Members of Parliament supporting this government here have been able to \nemancipate Mauritius following the unprecedented state capture. So, this evening, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir, I will focus on two important points. One is on democracy and human rights, \nand the second point, if I have time, is on economic diplomacy. So, at the time, let me remind \neverybody that a landslide victory of 60-0 places more responsibility and pressure on all the \nMembers. And especially on the two charismatic leaders, historic leaders, the Hon. Dr. Navin \nRamgoolam, Prime Minister, and the Deputy Prime Minister, the Hon. Paul Bérenger. \nAs for me, this evening, it is with an unwavering sense of duty – a sense of duty is very \nimportant – that I address you today. And in fact, our nation stands at historic crossroads \nwhere the echoes of the past – we have to understand the past, as hon. Mohamed said – but \nalso the imperatives of the present and the boundless potential of the future, how all this \nwould merge to forge a transformative destiny. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the people of Mauritius have spoken with clarity and \nconviction, entrusting this government with an unequivocal mandate to initiate courageous \nreforms that will shape a prosperous, just and resilient society. When MPs are elected, when \npeople are elected, they should not only think about sticking to power. We have to take bold \nmeasures to bring the reforms. After 10 November, the newly elected Members, spearheaded \nby the Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister and other Ministers, have, in fact, a \ntwist with destiny. Yes, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, a twist with destiny. So, we cannot \ndisappoint the people. It is very important for all the Members present here to remember that \nwe cannot disappoint the people. \nSo, looking at the first 64 days of the new era, we can feel that the people can breathe \nthe fresh air of liberty, and liberty is very important. The presidential address is one of the \nbest. The address reflects what we have in the political manifesto, and this is very important, \n\n112 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that we cannot fool the people. We had a political manifesto, and we \nhave been able to transform what is found in the political manifesto in the presidential \naddress. \nSo, first of all, I would like to briefly comment on parliamentarian democracy. So, what \nwe are seeing today, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the way you are conducting the debate, the way \nthe Speaker has been conducting the debate, is a lesson. We have learnt of the outstanding \nwork done by people, other Speakers like Sir Harilal Vaghjee, Sir Kailash Purryag and so \nmany others, but unfortunately, at one time, from 2014 to 2024, this august Parliament was \ntransformed into a sort of boxing ring, and today, it is really an august National Assembly. \nUnfortunately, at the same time, the previous regime did not understand that the \nConstitution is supreme and, once elected, there is a sort of constitutional right to remain an \nMP, and the Standing Orders, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, cannot prevail over the Constitution. \nWe witnessed the abusive naming of so many MPs, like hon. Paul Bérenger, hon. Ms Joanna \nBérenger, hon. Dr. Boolell, hon. Shakeel Mohamed and so many others, and also hon. Patrick \nAssirvaden. And in fact, our Parliament lived one of its bleakest periods. I hammer on that, \none of its bleakest periods in history. So therefore, what I propose is that we must revisit \nSection 32 of the Constitution but also the Standing Orders of the National Assembly to avoid \nsuch abuse which took place from 2014 to 2024. Du jamais vu, such a type of abuse! \nSo, this time, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, and also addressed to Madam Speaker, your \nbenevolent leadership and also characterised by neutrality and impartiality. The composure of \nboth of you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, and Madam Speaker, has given back the prestige to our \nParliament. Hopefully, our people will be proud of your speakership, both for you and \nMadam Speaker. \nNow, let me just refer to the sort of dictatorship where the previous government took \nus. For the past decade, our nation has faced significant setbacks in democracy, human rights, \ngovernance, and, unfortunately, institutions meant to safeguard justice and equity were \nweakened, allowing political interference to erode public trust. Transparency was \ncompromised, and the fundamental rights of our people were challenged. The independence \nof key institutions, including the judiciary – I lay emphasis on this – and regulatory bodies, \nbecause it is important to make a clear distinction between regulatory bodies and normal \nparastatal bodies, were severely undermined, affecting governance and accountability. \n\n113 \n \nCitizens faced increasing restrictions on their right to privacy with intrusive surveillance \npolicies, as explained by the Prime Minister this morning. Also, there was possible sniffing \nwhich breached the fundamental freedom of our citizens. \nWe cannot forget the attempt to undermine the role of the DPP, and the amendments \nwhich were brought to the IBA and the ICTA are still fresh in the minds of the people. The \nfreedom of expressions of citizens was jeopardised, just to mention a few among the multiple \nbreaches of democracy and human rights by the previous regime. Planting of drugs also, we \nshould not forget, was used to quell some Members of the Opposition and members of the \ncivil society. So, let us hope now that the police and the judiciary will shed light; just like in \nthe case of Kistnen, people want justice to be done. We should not forget that rating agencies \nand international agencies on human rights like V-Dem, Reporters sans frontières, Mo \nIbrahim, the State Department of the US, etc., downgraded Mauritius. A paradise island, once \na cradle of democracy, became a dictatorship led by Mr Pravind Jugnauth and the MSM. \nWhat can we do now to remedy the situation? In his presidential address, the President \nhas proposed to set up a constitutional commission. Here, it is important to understand why it \nis important to set up a commission because government itself cannot be in a situation of \nconflict of interest. So, it will be good to have an independent commission with independent \nexperts and possibly with some Members of the House who will form part of that important \ncommission. \nAt the same time, we must not reinvent the wheels, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. In fact, the \nproposal that came out from the Labour-MMM in 2014 was not bad. In fact, we can polish up \nto improve it. Other informal groups like the one led by Mr Jack Bizlall, Dr. Milan \nMeetarbhan, the late Joseph Tsang Mang Kin, Jocelyn Chan Low, Mr Laridon and myself \nhave come up with interesting proposals, and so has Rezistans ek Alternativ. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me now speak briefly about the need to… \nThe Deputy Speaker: You have only one minute. \nMr Narsinghen: One minute, okay. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Very briefly! \n\n114 \n \nMr Narsinghen: So, let me speak briefly about the importance of electing a president. \nA new way of electing a president is very important. We are in the context of a \nparliamentarian democracy. We are not in a context of a semi-presidential or presidential \nregime. So, therefore, having a broad electoral college is important because the President \ncannot be a stooge person of the Executive. So, it is important to allow the President to be \nelected on the basis of a broad electoral college. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is also important to reform the electoral system. Let me \nremind our Members that, yes, I have criticised the BLS system, but if we want to reform, we \nhave to know how to subsume the BLS system into the new reform which we are going to \npropose.  \nLast point, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wanted to comment on human rights and so many \nother things, but with the constraint of time… \nThe Deputy Speaker: You will have other opportunities! \nMr Narsinghen: I just want to mention local democracy. It is important to come up \nwith reforms to amend the Constitution and to make sure that no government can postpone \nelections. Referring to local democracy, I just want to highlight also that we have to ensure \nthat local democracy means that all constituencies are treated in the same way. Equitable \ntreatment is important because, in a way, I have to say it quite frankly that the South, \nincluding Constituencies No. 11, 12, 13 and 14 have been, to coin the phrase of Frantz Fanon, \na sort of damnés de la terre, the wretched of the Earth. So, I will make a special appeal to all \nthe ministers and all the parliamentarians to make sure that there is a sort of equitable \ndistribution in terms of infrastructural development for the distribution of jobs and other \ntypes of permits, of course, on the basis of merit, on the basis of qualifications and \nexperience. This is very important. \nMy last point, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Of course, you have a last point. \nMr Narsinghen: My conclusion… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Your conclusion, yes! \n\n115 \n \nMr Narsinghen: My conclusion is that we have witnessed a sort of Arab Spring – \nquiet, no violence. So, we cannot betray the people. We have to work and work and work \nwith dedication. This is very important. Also, we have to govern with humility and \ncompassion. \nThank you for your attention. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you, hon. Member. \nHon. Minister Pentiah, you have 20 minutes! \n(6.44 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms (Mr L. Pentiah): Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, it is indeed a singular honour for me to stand before this House today to \ndeliver my first speech in the context of the Government Programme 2025-2029. As an \nelected Member of the National Assembly for Constituency No. 7, Piton-Rivière du Rempart, \nfollowing what my hon. friends have said earlier on, the landslide victory of l’Alliance du \nChangement. This resounding vox populi clearly demonstrates that indeed the voice of God is \nloud and clear for our country to be governed by a responsible and honest class of politicians. \nThis government shall indeed serve the people of the country in the manner and with the \nrespect it deserves. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me please, at the very outset, congratulate Madam Speaker \nand yourself, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, for your election as Speaker and Deputy Speaker of \nthe National Assembly and reiterate the trust that has been placed upon your capable \nshoulders to conduct the affairs of this august Assembly with fairness and within the \nprocedures of the Standing Orders. \nI also wish to very highly acclaim the Leader of the House, our Prime Minister, for his \npersonal achievement as well as his resilience in the face of significant challenges. I have \nwitnessed some personally, displaying – the word I chose, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir – \n‘indomptable’ as a lion. But then, again, the computer refused it. \nIt gave me an ‘indomitable spirit’ that has allowed him to continue leading with both \nstrength and vision. His tenacity to persevere during difficult times, which we have all \nwitnessed in the hands of the previous government, and his ability to remain resolute even in \n\n116 \n \nthe most dire circumstances are an inspiration for us all. Through his leadership, he has \nshown that with determination and perseverance, even the greatest obstacles can be \nsurmounted. \nFurthermore, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to join in to also extend my heartfelt \ngratitude to our valued partners of the Alliance du Changement: the Mouvement Militant \nMauricien (MMM) led by hon. Deputy Prime Minister Paul Bérenger, emblématique en son \nnom, en sa capacité et en ce qu’il a fait pour le pays et sa contribution; the Nouveaux \nDémocrates; and comrades of Rezistans ek Alternativ for their support of this shared vision. \nLast but certainly not least, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to express my deepest \ngratitude to the people of my Constituency No.7, Piton/Rivière du Rempart, for their trust and \nconfidence in me for believing in my conviction. Their unwavering support is the driving \nforce behind my commitment to serve them with dedication and integrity. I also wish to \nextend my sincere thanks to my two esteemed colleagues in this journey, whose collaboration \nand partnership have been invaluable. Together, we will work tirelessly to ensure the progress \nand wellbeing of our constituency. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Government Programme 2025-2029: ‘A Bridge to the \nFuture’, as presented by His Excellency the President of the Republic, contains all essential \ningredients to redress our country, especially after having suffered under the dictatorship of \nunpatriotic political leaders for over a decade. \nThe measures announced reflect the philosophy along which this elected government is \ndetermined to give a renewed dynamism to the way the affairs of our country will be \nconducted. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I quote – \n“The rate of criminality of a country is nothing else but an indication of its economy in \ncrisis.” – Fidel Castro. \nFirst and foremost, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this government is firmly committed to \nredressing the economy of our country with clear, sharp, expert economic measures while at \nthe same time ensuring the constitutional powers of the Office of the Director of Public \nProsecutions in order to foster effective measures to address issues of criminality. \n\n117 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, drugs are one such major issue. To merely say that the scourge \nof drugs has reached uncontrollable limits would be an understatement. M. le président, avec \nle gouvernement précédent, les dealers sont devenus des barons et ont eux aussi bénéficié des \npromotions. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, what have we not seen? Que Dieu nous protège pour que nous \nne voyions plus les barons de drogue voyager en classe affaires aux frais du peuple. Pour que \nnous ne voyions plus les barons de la drogue prendre le lac sacré en otage et gare aux gens \navec la responsabilité ministérielle qui ont saccagé la sainteté du Ganga Talao au vu et au su \ndes dirigeants du pays d’alors. Le bonhomme se tapait l’estomac en se disant que c’était son \ngouvernement qui avait institué une commission d’enquête sur la drogue et, à la surprise, \ncomme a dit le DPM, et son impératrice et lui-même, les doigts ont été pointés vers lui, son \ngouvernement, son entourage et surtout son supplier de kamaron et bred songe. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, what have we not seen from tractopelle to gas cylinders and \nWakashio with fishmongers travelling in police helicopters while families have suffered, kids \nhave died, and youngsters have derailed while filling custodial centres with victims \nconsuming a panoply of substances supplied by the unscrupulous scourge of drugs walking \nfree? Beware: this government is coming for you! \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, NATReSA, recklessly dismantled by the previous government, \nwill rise from its ashes, and the committee managing the new NATReSA will be carefully \nchosen by no one else than the Prime Minister himself. The concern of this government is to \ngo to its people suffering from addiction. To cater for them through proper and effective \nrehabilitation programmes and to ensure effective reinsertion in the bosom of their families \nand the society. This is the programme of a responsible government. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, while the Police Force will be valued and properly equipped, \nthere will be transparent recruitment, training and promotion procedures, thereby ensuring \ncompetence, fairness and confidence in the Police Force, which should get the respect it \ndeserves as it stands to protect our children, our elders, our families, entre autres, and the \npeople of our country. The Police Force will be equipped with modern technologies and a \nproper legal framework, and the Police and Criminal Evidence Bill is going to be a reality in \nthe hands of this Prime Minister and Leader of this House. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, our country’s progress since independence has long been \ndriven by the indelible contribution of our public officers. The individual and collective \n\n118 \n \ncontributions have steadily driven us forward on the path towards prosperity and social \njustice over decades. \nHowever, our public service needs to move towards embracing a modern, adaptive \nleadership style that fosters innovation, collaboration and responsiveness. The needs of the \npeople as per the bold measures announced in the Government Programme which clearly set \nout unprecedented administrative reforms. We are indeed living in an era of unmatched \ntechnological advancements and complex global challenges that have a tremendous impact \non everyday facets of our lives. \nOur public service must evolve to meet the aspirations of our population, which \ndemands round-the-clock, people-centric services, greater transparency, efficiency and \naccountability. Today we reaffirm our commitment to transforming the public sector into a \nresponsive, transparent and people-centric institution that serves as a bedrock to spearhead \nthe audacious reforms outlined in the Government Programme such that the public service \npositions itself as a driver of national progress. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, at the heart of this transformation is the Public Sector Reforms \nBill which my Ministry will spearhead. This landmark bill reflects the government’s \ndedication to modernising the public service, fostering good governance and transparency \nand ensuring accountability at all levels. It is a bold step forward providing a comprehensive \nframework to guide reform initiatives and lay the foundation for a future-ready public sector. \nThe bill will lay emphasis on regulatory oversight, give legal status to key documents, and \nintroduce mechanisms to ensure statutory compliance with reforms and transformation \ninitiatives. My Ministry will no longer simply make recommendations for changes; it will \nnow have statutory authority to enforce them, ensuring reforms are implemented consistently \nand effectively across all public institutions. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, under the previous government, led by the MSM, we saw a \nsystematic and systemic pattern of discrimination. Doors to employment and contracts or \nwhatnot were wide open for ‘nou ban’, while for ‘ban la’ the doors remained firmly shut, \nregardless of their competence or experience. This inequality became even more glaring \nwhen those already in employment often, ‘ban la’, were subjected to harassment, \nvictimisation and unfair dismissal. \nOne particularly troubling example from November 2015 was the recruitment of 10 \ndoctors who had close ties with government members. Who knows not the case of Doctor \n\n119 \n \nV.J., a PhD holder in Economics with extensive lecturing experience at the MIE, who was \nunjustly denied a position despite a favourable court verdict! \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this is just a few of many instances where merit was sidelined \nin favour of political favouritism, further eroding the public’s trust in our institutions. It is my \nduty to also point out that the previous irresponsible government violated all principles of \nethics and good governance. \nM. le président, le gouvernement précédent a osé recruter et donner les promotions que \nquelques jours avant les writs des élections d’octobre 2024 à pas moins de 426 personnes, qui \nont été recrutées dans les services publics ou promues pendant la période clairement indiquée \npar des circulaires du PSC, LGSC et DFSC que toute décision devait être gelée en ce sens.  \nThis can no longer continue. The people have spoken and overtly shown that it \ndemands ‘changement’. This government will respond to the demands of the people. What \nthe people want is simple – a government that listens, a government that acts in the best \ninterest of all its people, and a government with courage, competence and convictions. M. le \nprésident, et certainement le peuple, a dit non au petit bonhomme souvent référé à juste titre \ncomme ‘Pinocchio’. \nThe dire need for change is not just a call for new leadership. It is a call for a return to \nfairness, transparency and equal opportunity which this government has set as its mission \nstatement in its programme as enunciated by His Excellency, the President of our country. Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, it is worth noting that the existing Performance Management System, \nthe PMS as we call it in the public sector, framework will be reviewed and aligned to reflect \nthe new vision of government for an effective and efficient public sector. In line with this \nphilosophy, a more holistic approach towards performance management in the public sector \nwill be adopted where the focus will be on both individual and organisational performance. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, a new training institute will be operational in the days to come \nto cater for training and capacity and capability building. The institute will provide quality \ntraining tailored to the needs and requirements of public officers serving the people of our \ncountry. The mot d'ordre at the centre of it – serving the nation. The institute will be a state-\nof-the-art infrastructure equipped with modern facilities and will evolve and serve as a \nregional centre of excellence. It will operate with a strategic plan conceived and constituted \nfrom experts’ input both from our country and from abroad while linkages are being \n\n120 \n \ndeveloped and encouraged with international institutions from India, the United Kingdom, \nSingapore, Malaysia, and Rwanda, to name only a few. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, restoring trust in public institutions is one of the greatest \nchallenges we face. Over the years, there has been quasi-complete erosion of trust fuelled by \ninefficiency, lack of transparency and unequal opportunities. This government, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir, is committed to addressing these issues head-on to enable our institutions to \nfunction at their optimum. \nFurthermore, as the Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms, I am \ncommitted to ensuring that these reforms are implemented effectively and that they deliver \ntangible benefits for both public officers and the people of our country. \nLet us embrace this opportunity to make a difference. Let us commit to upholding the \nvalues of transparency, fairness and integrity in all that we do. Together, we can lay the \nfoundation for a brighter, more prosperous future for our country. As we move forward with \nconfidence, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let us work together, united in purpose, to transform our \ncivil service into a beacon of trust, innovation and service-centred institution that inspires and \nmeets the aspirations of generations to come. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, long live Mauritius in peace, justice and liberty. I thank you. \nMr Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Members, Madam Speaker will now take over \nthe Chair.  \n At this stage, Madam Speaker took the Chair.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Please be seated. Yes, hon. Mrs Leu-Govind.  \n(9.04 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Arts & Culture (Mrs V. Leu-Govind): Thank you, Madam \nSpeaker. \nHon. Members, before I begin with my speech, first of all, I would like to express my \nheartfelt congratulations to Madam Speaker and the Deputy Speaker for their nomination. I \nwould also like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr the Honourable Prime Minister and the \nDeputy Prime Minister, my leaders – hon. Kushal Lobine and hon. Richard Duval – for the \ntrust they placed in me. \n\n121 \n \nThis is the stark contrast with what I was made to endure by the leader of PMSD. He \nhad a problem with my background; he had a problem with my accent, but look at the turn of \nhistory. That traitor has been dismantled politically and thrown out by Mauritians. And, \ntoday, I stand before this august Assembly representing my village, Case Noyale, and I am \nvery proud of my roots. For this, I am grateful to the Prime Minister and Deputy Prime \nMinister who defended me and trusted me. It is both an honour and a privilege to serve under \ntheir leadership. I am fully committed to fulfilling my responsibilities with dedication and \nintegrity. \nI stand before this House today as the elected representative of Constituency No. 14, a \nconstituency that has for long been marginalised, ignored and used as a political pawn by \ncertain individuals who only sought personal gain, but today, after ten years of repression and \nstagnation, Mauritians have regained control of their country. \nToday, after ten years of repression and stagnation, the Mauritians have regained \ncontrol of their country. They have placed their trust in this government and have great \nexpectations from their government. \nUnder the previous administration, Mauritius was left in ruins. However, the \nGovernment Programme 2025-2029 is bringing new hope and real solutions to many long-\nstanding issues that have affected our people. Madam Speaker, one of the biggest struggles in \nmy constituency is housing. Too many families are living in poor conditions without access to \nbasic infrastructure. Hon. Mohamed has already announced plans for NSLD housing, and I \nam confident that these homes will be built with proper facilities, unlike what happened in the \npast. \nMadam Speaker, it is deeply shameful and unacceptable that in 2025, families in my \nconstituency are still living without access to basic necessities such as water and electricity. \nFor example, the inhabitants of Coteau Raffin. This is not just an oversight. It is a betrayal of \ntrust. The Leader of the Opposition, hon. Lesjongard, is well aware of this situation, as he \nwas personally involved in helping these families to obtain their plots of land. Yet, when he \nassumed the position of Minister of Public Utilities, he failed to fulfil the promise made to \nprovide them with access to water and electricity! \nHow can we allow people to be used for political gain? This must stop, Madam \nSpeaker! Our role is to serve the people, not to exploit their vulnerabilities for short-term \npolitical advantage. In some areas, children have to walk three to four kilometres just to catch \n\n122 \n \na bus to go to school. This is unacceptable! I sincerely thank hon. Minister Osman Mahomed \nfor acting quickly. Within just 3 months, he provided a temporary solution while a long-term \nplan was being developed. Yet, it is the same constituency where one man ruled for 40 years, \nthe former king of 14, and even served as the Minister of Transport but did nothing to fix the \nissues! \nHealthcare remains a major concern in my constituency. We lack proper healthcare \nfacilities and ambulances in the locality. I want to thank the Hon. Anil Bachoo, who is \nworking tirelessly to improve healthcare services, not only in my constituency but across the \nisland. I am sure he will bring a real solution for these problems. Madam Speaker, for years, \nthe previous government undermined democracy. One of the worst injustices was cancelling \nmunicipal elections, taking away the right of citizens to vote for their local representatives. \nThis government is restoring the democracy. \nAs part of the Government Programme 2025-2029, a new law will guarantee that the \nmunicipal and district council elections are held on time so that no government can again \nviolate fundamental rights. Yet, hon. Adrien Duval dared to question municipal elections even \nthough he stood by and watched as the previous government destroyed democracy. Worse, \ncouncillors of his party are still sitting in municipal councils. Yet, they have been completely \nsilent since the general election. Where is their voice now? \nLet me be clear. In just a few months, people will have their say, and they will send a \nstrong message through the ballot box. I also want to congratulate the hon. minister Woochit \nand his Junior Minister, hon. Fawzi Allymun, who are bringing reforms to local government \nto stop the abuse of the power that was happening before. \nUnder the previous government, civil servants were pressured to either sign the \ndocuments or get transferred. Some resisted and they paid a heavy price. I want to publicly \nthank Madame Bhujohory, my former deputy CEO when I was president at the Black River \nDistrict Council. She stood by her principles and dared to report Alan Ganoo to the police for \norganising an illegal concert. \nArtists were being denied permits to perform at the cost of her job position. Yes, she got \ntransferred for this action. Where is Alan Ganoo today? In the dustbin of history! This is \nkarma!  \nMadam Speaker, I have always fought for the rights of artists. Today, I am honoured \nand grateful to the hon. Prime Minister and hon. Khushal Lobine for entrusting me with the \n\n123 \n \nposition of Junior Minister for Arts and Culture. This is a vast and important ministry and I \nam privileged to work alongside with hon. Mahen Gondeea to restore the dignity of the \nMinistry of Arts and Culture. \nUnder this government, the Arts and Culture sector is being strengthened like never \nbefore. We are removing bureaucratic delays and creating streamlined systems to make it \neasier for artists to organise events. For the first time, artists will have official recognition \nallowing them to access funding, social security and professional opportunities, making \ncultural spaces more accessible, promoting local talent and ensuring that our artistic heritage \nis preserved and celebrated. \nI also want to thank the members of the Rezistans ek Alternativ who have been strong \nsupporters for the art and culture sector and continue to stand by this government’s initiatives. \nThis Government is not working in silos. We are collaborating across ministries to bring real \nimpactful changes. I want to thank the Ministry of Agro-Industry, the Ministry of \nEnvironment and the Ministry of Tourism, who have been key players in the Île aux Bénitiers \nproject. \nI extend a special thanks to my colleague, hon. Richard Duval; hon. Ms Joanna \nBérenger; and hon. Fabrice David, as well as the President of the Black River District \nCouncil and councillors, who have all worked together to assess the situation on the ground \nand invest in sustainable development to reduce long-term environmental risks. Along with \nmy two esteemed colleagues, hon. Jugurnauth and hon. Babajee, we will continue to press for \nreal solutions in our constituency. \nMadam Speaker, gone are the days of a government that ignores the struggles of the \npeople. Today, we have a government that listens, acts and delivers results. \nThe Government Programme 2025-2029 is not just a vision. It is a commitment to \nchange. To those who still defend the corrupt, oppressive past, let me remind you, Mauritians \nremember. They remember the censorship, the erased documents and the injustice they \nendured. Today, we have a government that truly represents the people. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Junior Minister! Hon. Dr. Boolell! \nDr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, I beg to move for the adjournment of the debates. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \n\n124 \n \nDebate adjourned accordingly. \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Friday 07 February 2025 at 3.00 p.m. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded.  \nQuestion put and agreed to.  \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned! \nAdjournment Matters! We are not forcing anybody. Yes, hon. François. \nMATTERS RAISED \n(7.17 p.m.) \nRODRIGUES – AIR MAURITIUS – SEATS NON-AVAILABILITY \nMr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues): Thank you, Madam Speaker. The \nissue I am raising tonight, again, is with regard to the present non-availability of seats on Air \nMauritius prevailing on the Rodrigues-Mauritius route addressed to the hon. Prime Minister.  \nYesterday, Madam Speaker, I spent the whole day from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. with so many \nof the citizens at Plaine Corail Airport trying to secure a seat to attend to my parliamentary \nduty on time today. Finally, the personnel thereat this morning, and I do not know with what \nkoustik, have been able to uplift me to reach parliament late. I have to say that I appreciate \nand thank them for their valuable efforts despite situations that are beyond their control. \nMay I again request the hon. Prime Minister, through his good office, to request Air \nMauritius to review and increase its flight schedule on the Rodrigues-Mauritius route, \nespecially during weekends, on Fridays and Mondays, and alternate weekdays? \nActuellement, c’est un calvaire, M. le Premier ministre, pour de nombreux voyageurs \nqui souhaitent voyager. La queue partout! This should no longer be allowed to continue.  \nIn the same breath, allow me, Madam Speaker, to request the government, through the \nPrime Minister’s Office, the Ministry for Rodrigues, and the Ministry of Shipping, to also \nreconsider and plan for the availability of passenger seats by sea on the MV Mauritius \nTrochetia, especially during the coming school holidays period. I thank you. \n\n125 \n \nThe Prime Minister: I will certainly look into the matter. It is a good sign that more \npeople are travelling. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: It is a good thing he managed to come today. \nYes, hon. Beechook! \n(7.19 p.m.) \nSALAZIE, PONT BONDIEU & NOUVELLE DECOUVERTE – MOBILE \nNETWORK PROBLEM  \nMr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil): I will request the hon. \nMinister of Technology, Communication, and Innovation if he could urge the \ntelecommunication companies to please ensure that there is a mobile network in the locality \nof Salazie, Pont Bondieu, and Nouvelle Decouverte because this road is being used by lots of \npeople who, from Constituency No. 9 to Ebene, travel to work. Very often there is no \nnetwork, and in the absence of a network, very often when they have issues and breakdowns \nof their vehicles, it is very dangerous for them to stay there without a network—it also \nextends to La Nicolière, where the people from the North, Constituency No. 7, and \nConstituency No. 6 use that road very frequently to travel to Ebene and to the centre of the \nisland. Thank you. \nThe Minister of Technology, Communication and Innovation (Dr. A. Ramtohul): \nHon. Beechook, thank you for the note; we are aware of this problem. We are also aware of \nthe fact that there has been an increase in the density of traffic through that road from Pont \nBondieu to Salazie, and we have already taken up the matter with the key suppliers of the \nnetwork across the island. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nAt 7.20 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Friday 07 February 2025 at \n3.00 p.m. \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nRODRIGUES – ELECTORAL COMMISSIONER SUB-OFFICE – FIRE OUTBREAK",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/39",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 39,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/39) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Emirates Airline Swimming Pool and \nSports Complex at Closel, Phoenix, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nMunicipal Council of Vacoas-Phoenix, information as to the – \n(a)  name of the owner of the land where same has been constructed;  \n(b)  amount of public funds injected for the – \n(i)  \nconstruction, and  \n\n137 \n \n(ii)  maintenance of the complex, and  \n(c)  amount being paid in terms of rent to the Council, giving a breakdown thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: With regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to apprise the House that the \noutgoing government had initiated the Emirates Airline Swimming Pool and Sports Complex \nproject in the year 2019, on land partly belonging to Société Central Park and partly on a strip \nof State land of 3m wide at Phoenix.  This project is a tangible proof of the incompetence and \ngross mismanagement by the former government as State land when, in fact, it was, and is \nstill privately-owned land as at today. \nI am informed by the Municipal Council of Vacoas-Phoenix that in 2019, the then \nMinistry of Housing and Land Use Planning vested a plot of land of an extent of 9500 m2, at \nClosel, Phoenix, into the Municipal Council of Vacoas-Phoenix, for the construction of the \nSports Facilities.  In the same year, the Municipal Council of Vacoas-Phoenix had put a plot \nof land of an extent of 5700 m2 at the disposal of the Vacoas/Phoenix Swimming Pool \nFoundation, for the construction of the swimming pool with associated amenities, in line with \nthe terms and conditions of an MoU between the Foundation and the Municipal Council of \nVacoas-Phoenix. \nIn that context, in 2022, the Municipal Council of Vacoas-Phoenix signed a lease \nagreement with the Foundation to lease the plot of land of an extent of 4000 m2 where the \nSwimming Pool has been constructed against the payment of an annual fee of Rs500,000. \nIn 2019, the Ministry of Housing and Lands approved the vesting of the subject site of \nthe extent 2A26 in the Ministry of Local Government to be put at the disposal of Municipal \nCouncil of Vacoas-Phoenix. \nHowever, on 30 April 2024, the Ministry of Housing and Lands waived the vesting of \nthe land formerly belonging to Société Central Park given that the deed of exchange had not \nbeen finalized. \nIn order to sort out the land issue, the Ministry of Housing and Lands is presently \nliaising with Société Central Park to finalise the exchange of land so as to secure title for the \nplot of land over which stands the swimming pool and also MUGA project. \nWith respect to part (c) of the question, I wish to apprise the House that as per the terms \nand conditions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 04 February 2022 \nbetween the Council and the Foundation, the latter has to pay a yearly rental of Rs500,000 to \nthe Council for the lease of the said plot of land.  In this context, a payment amounting to \nRs500,000 was made on 10 February 2022.  However, the yearly payment rental for the years \n2023 and 2024 have not been made given to irregularity with respect to the land in question. \n\n138 \n \nMy Ministry is liaising with the Ministry of Housing and Lands to sort out the \nirregularity on the exchange of land and ensure that the deed of sale is drawn at the earliest. \nIn that respect, a meeting was held at the level of the Ministry of Housing and Lands on \n04 December 2024, where it was agreed that officers from the latter Ministry would amend \nthe survey report with the appropriate extend to be exchanged, following which, the deed of \nsale would be drawn and signed by all parties concerned. \n \nUPSEE –EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS ACT 2008 – OBJECTS ALIGNMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/40",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 40,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations – In regard to the Union of Private Secondary Education Employees (UPSEE), will he, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to",
      "question": "(No. B/40) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to the Union of Private \nSecondary Education Employees (UPSEE), he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to whether the objects of UPSEE aligns with the definition of a Trade Union \nas provided for in section 2 of the Employment Relations Act 2008 and, if not, the measures \nbeing envisaged by his Ministry in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Registrar of Associations that the Union of Private \nSecondary Education Teachers was registered in June 1976 as a trade union under the \nrepealed Industrial Relations Act 1973 and it changed its name into Union of Private \nSecondary Education Employees (UPSEE) in April 1979. \nSection 2 of the Employment Relations Act 2008 defines a trade union as follows – \n“trade union” –  \n(a)  \nmeans a registered association of persons, having as one of  its objects the \nregulation of employment relations between workers and employers, and \n(b)  \nincludes a federation or a confederation, except in relation to certain \nprovisions of the Act. \nI am informed that, on 21 August 2024, the Registrar of Associations received an \napplication dated 20 August 2024 from the Secondary and Preparatory School Teachers and \nOther Staff Union for the cancellation of the registration of Union of Private Secondary \nEducation Employees, under section 7(2) of the Employment Relations Act 2008, on grounds \nthat the registration of UPSEE was obtained by fraud or misinterpretation, in as much as, \ninter-alia, UPSEE’s registration under the repealed Industrial Relations Act (ITA) 1973 does \nnot align with the definition of a trade union that is “an association of persons, whether \nregistered or not, having as one of its objects that the regulation of industrial relations \nbetween employers and include a federation”. \n\n139 \n \nI am further informed that the Registrar of Associations subsequently issued a notice \ndated 30 August 2024 under section 7(2) of the Employment Relations Act 2008 to the Union \nof Private Secondary Education Employees (UPSEE) to – \n(i) \nnotify it of the application received for the cancellation of its registration from \nthe Secondary and Preparatory School Teachers and Other Staff Union and \nthe ground for cancellation, and \n(ii) \nshow cause by 20 September 2024 why its registration should not be \ncancelled. \nOn 16 September 2024, the UPSEE, through its attorney-at-law, wrote to the Registrar \nof Associations, and denied the allegations made by the Secondary and Preparatory School \nTeachers and Other Staff Union, and objected to the cancellation of its registration as a trade \nunion.  \nAs required under section 7(3) of the Employment Relations Act 2008, the Registrar \napplied to the Employment Relations Tribunal (ERT) for the cancellation of the registration \nof the Union of Private Secondary Education Employees.  \nHowever, the Registrar of Associations has informed the ERT that the objects of \nUPSEE are aligned with the definition of a trade union as provided for in section 2 of the \nEmployment Relations Act 2008. \nIn its Order of 10 February 2025, the ERT, having considered the evidence on record as \nwell as the submission of Counsel, held that it cannot be satisfied that the UPSEE’s \nregistration must be cancelled pursuant to the present application made under section 7(3) of \nthe Act and set aside the application from the Registrar of Associations. \nCÔTE D’OR NATIONAL SPORTS COMPLEX – ACCESS TO \nINFRASTRUCTURE – CONDITIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/41",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 41,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/41) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Côte d’Or National Sports \ncomplex, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Multisport \nInfrastructure Limited, information as to the conditions attached for the use of the \ninfrastructure of the complex by sports federation.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Mauritius Multisports Infrastructure Ltd. that all National \nSports Federations can use the Côte d'Or National Sports Complex for their events and \ncompetitions, upon payment of a rental fee which has been set below cost to support sports \n\n140 \n \ndevelopment. Bookings are subject to formal application and payment procedures, which \nvary according to the contract value. \nAs the House is certainly aware, the Côte d’Or National Sports Complex also houses a \nHigh-Performance Centre. This Centre plays a crucial role in providing top-tier training \nresources for athletes and coaches, especially those nominated by my Ministry. These \nservices are provided free of charge to the athletes. \n \nMAHEBOURG – BARACHOIS – LEASEHOLDER’S DETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/42",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 42,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/42) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the Barachois found next to the fisheries post in Mahebourg, he will state if same \nhas been leased and, if so, indicate the name and address of the leaseholder of the barachois.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \n \nWATER SUPPLY CRISIS – PRIVATE OPERATORS – \nBOREHOLES REQUISITION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/43",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 43,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/43) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the current \nwater supply affecting several regions around the country, he will state if consideration will \nbe given for the requisitioning of boreholes from private operators to alleviate those regions.",
      "answer": "Reply: The water 24/7 slogan repeated ad nauseam by the previous government has \nturned out to be a complete lie. Today our country is facing a crisis which is affecting \nadversely water distribution throughout the island. To address this critical issue, I have given \ninstructions to my Ministry to consider seriously the option of requisitioning groundwater \nboreholes licensed to private operators. \nI am informed that in accordance with Section 16(1) of the Ground Water Regulations \n2011, the Central Water Authority has the right, in the public interest, to abstract water from \nprivate boreholes in the event of a severe drought or water shortage caused by climate change \nor any other calamity.  \n\n141 \n \nThis provision is a mandatory condition attached to groundwater licences at the time of \nissuance or renewal. According to Water Resources Commission records, there are 165 \nprivate boreholes with a yield of 500 m³/day or more, located across the island. \nGiven that the situation is more severe in the North, the CWA has identified six \nboreholes in the North, in the first instance and is actively engaging with borehole licensees \nto facilitate their temporary use for water supply reinforcement.  Four out of the six licensees \nhave agreed to collaborate and CWA is making necessary arrangements accordingly.   \nMeetings are ongoing with the remaining licensees. The exercise will pursue regarding \nprivate boreholes as well as boreholes not in use located in other parts of the island. \nEvery effort is being made to mobilise additional resources to supplement the deficient \nstorage of our main reservoirs in order to alleviate the situation of the population. \n \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 10 – FLOOD PRONE AREAS – DRAIN PROJECTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/44",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 44,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/44) Mr R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the recurrent flooding of \nroads resulting from rainwater runoff since the initiation of the new derocking process in \nsugar-cane fields in Constituency No. 10, Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East, he \nwill state the measures being taken to clear the drainage systems of these flooded roads to \nensure that excess water is effectively channelled into the river, thereby mitigating the risk of \naccident.",
      "answer": "Reply: The Land Drainage Authority has identified 14 flood prone areas in \nConstituency No. 10. \nOut of those 14 areas, the following eight regions are impacted due to overland flows \nemanating from sugar cane fields, namely – \na) \n Morcellement Sans Souci, Montagne Blanche; \nb) \n Avenue des Echassiers, Mont Ida; \nc) \n Clemencia; \nd) \n Tagore Road, Ernest Florent; \ne) \n Camp de Masque; \nf) \n Pont Lardier, Bel Air; \n\n142 \n \ng) \n Junction Petit Paquet Road, and \nh) \n Cooperative Road, Melrose. \nIn view of attenuating the impact of flooding, 70 drain projects have been identified in \nConstituency No. 10 for a total project value of Rs1.66 billion. 22 of those projects have \nalready been completed, whereas one project regarding the upgrading of Camp Sonar Bridge \nfor a contract value of Rs6.154 m. at Camp de Masque Pave is nearing completion. \nMoreover, several cutoff drains and internal drain networks will be constructed, \nincluding the upgrading of culverts at different localities, namely Morc Sans Souci, Mt \nBlanche; Avenue des Echassiers, Clemencia; Pont Lardier, and Melrose, among others. \nMAHEBOURG HOSPITAL – AMBULANCE SERVICES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/45",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 45,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/45) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the ambulance services at \nMahebourg hospital, he will state the – \n(a) \nnumber of ambulances – \n(i) \ncurrently available and operational;  \n(ii) \nin good working conditions and fully equipped to handle emergencies, and  \n(b)  ongoing efforts, if any, to improve the fleet.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nE-HEALTH PROJECT – STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/46",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 46,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/46) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the E-Health project, he will state the \ncurrent status of the project.",
      "answer": "Reply: My Ministry, in collaboration with the United Nations Development \nProgramme (UNDP), has embarked on an e-Health project for a paperless, modern and \nintegrated health care information management system, which would improve the quality of \nhealth services in all the public healthcare facilities. The first phase of the project will consist \nof the deployment of foundational systems that establish the necessary digital infrastructure \nto support patient and health service management.  \nThe core modules under Phase I include – \na) \nPatient Administration System (PAS) to manage the administrative lifecycle of \npatients, including registration, admission, discharge, and transfer processes; \n\n143 \n \nb) \ne-Health portal and mobile application to provide a digital interface for patients \nand healthcare providers to access health services, personal medical information, \nand appointment scheduling; \nc) \nBlood Transfusion Services (BTS) and Donor Management Application to \nsupport the end-to-end management of blood donations, donor records, and \ntransfusion processes; \nd) \nReporting and analytics to facilitate real-time data aggregation, dashboards, and \nperformance monitoring to support evidence-based decision-making and health \nsystem governance, and \ne) \nLaboratory Information Management System (LIMS) integration with the e-\nHealth system and deployment across wards to enable electronic test ordering \nwith automated transmission of results from laboratory analysers to wards and \npatients (where required). \nWhen I took office last November 2024, I was apprised that Phase I, which was \nsupposed to go live in November 2024, had accumulated a lot of delays. In January 2025, I \nchaired a meeting together with the hon. Minister of Information Technology, \nCommunication and Innovation, the Resident Representative of the UNDP and all other \nparties involved in the implementation of the project.  \nAfter discussions, it has been decided that all the components of the project would be \nre-prioritised with the objective of having a soft launch of Phase I by August 2025 at one of \nthe health regions which is most appropriate in terms of site readiness. \nThe current status regarding the project is as follows – \n(a) \nsite assessment has been completed for all the health regions; \n(b) \nsupply, design, installation, testing and commissioning of the e-Health system is \nat protype-testing phase; \n(c) \ndigital health architecture and blueprint is in process through consultancy \nservices; \n(d) \ndata and electrical cabling works are in progress; \n(e) \ntraining of the end-users is ongoing, and \n\n144 \n \n(f) \nthe Attorney-General’s Office is being approached for the elaboration of the \ndigital health law. \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 10 – FIRE STATION - CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/47",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 47,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/47) Dr. R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the multiple instances of fire \noutbreaks encountered in Constituency No 10, Montagne Blanche and Grand River South \nEast, he will state if consideration will be given for the construction of a Fire Station in the \nsaid Constituency, taking into account that the closest Fire Station is situated at Centre de \nFlacq and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Reply: At the very outset, I wish to inform the House that the previous government did \nnot prioritise this crucial infrastructure project, which is directly linked to the safety and well-\nbeing of our citizens. Despite being under consideration for over a decade, the project faced \nsignificant procedural delays. In fact, it took eight months to relaunch the tender process \nfollowing an unsuccessful initial bidding exercise.  \nI have been informed by the Mauritius Fire and Rescue Service (MFRS) that the first \ntender for the construction of a Fire Station at Montagne Blanche was launched on 11 \nOctober 2023 through the Central Procurement Board (CPB), with the closing date for bid \nsubmission set for 14 November 2023. However, due to various technical and procedural \nissues, the bidding documents required amendments, which were carried out with the \ntechnical assistance of the Ministry of National Infrastructure. The revised documents were \nsubsequently submitted to the CPB for vetting on 17 June 2024.  \nOn 02 September 2024, the CPB requested further amendments to the bidding \ndocuments, particularly concerning the template of \"Sub Clause 2.42(a)\" - Special \nExperience. The necessary modifications were made, and the tender was relaunched on 04 \nSeptember 2024. The closing date for bid submission was set for 28 January 2025, and the \nbid opening took place on 31 January 2025, during which five bids were received.  \nFollowing this, the Central Procurement Board will now proceed with the evaluation of \nbids through a dedicated Bid Evaluation Committee. Once a contractor is selected, an 18-\nmonth construction period will be allocated from the date of site handover to complete the \nproject. \n\n145 \n \nThis Government is fully committed to fast-tracking projects that are essential for \npublic safety. The construction of the Montagne Blanche Fire Station is a strategic initiative \naimed at reducing emergency response times and strengthening firefighting capabilities. This \nfacility will provide additional support to the Fire Stations in Flacq, Quatre Bornes, and \nCurepipe, particularly in the event of major incidents. \nFurthermore, I am pleased to inform the House that, in addition to the Montagne \nBlanche Fire Station, a Satellite Fire Station is also being planned for Bel Air. The Mauritius \nFire and Rescue Service, in collaboration with the District Council of Flacq, has identified a \n1600m2 plot of land within the Bel Air Market compound for this purpose. My Ministry is \ncurrently coordinating with the technical team from the Ministry of National Infrastructure, \nwhich is finalising the preliminary drawings, expected to be completed by mid-February \n2025.  \nThe establishment of this Satellite Fire Station will enable the Mauritius Fire and \nRescue Service to achieve a targeted emergency response time of five minutes, aligning with \ninternational standards set by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA 1710).  \nMy Ministry remains in continuous coordination with the Mauritius Fire and Rescue \nService and the Ministry of National Infrastructure to ensure that both projects are executed \nefficiently and without unnecessary delays. \nThe safety of our citizens is of utmost priority to this Government. We are fully \ncommitted to ensuring that critical emergency response infrastructure is in place to protect \nlives and property. \nPLANTATION ACTIVITIES – GOVERNMENT’S ASSISTANCE – PROPOSED \nSCHEMES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/48",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 48,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/48) Dr. R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to facilities extended to planters, he will state if Government proposes to assist \nplanters in having access to loans via cooperative societies to initiate new plantation \nactivities.",
      "answer": "Reply: The Development Bank of Mauritius (DMB) Ltd. offers three types of loan \nscheme to encourage new plantation activities. These are as hereunder – \n\n146 \n \n(i) Cane Replantation Loan Scheme \nThe Scheme aims to encourage planters to renew some 10,000 Ha of land under \nsugarcane plantation. It has also been extended to planters willing to bring back their \nabandoned land into cane cultivation. Small and large planters, cooperative societies, \ncompanies and those sociétés recommended by the Mauritius Cane Industry Authority \n(MCIA) are eligible for the loan at the rate of Rs66,000/arpent.  An interest rate of 2.5% \nper annum is applicable and the repayment period is up to five years, including a \nmoratorium of one year. \nAccording to the MCIA, all planters who consign their canes through Credit \nCooperative Societies are also eligible for this loan through their respective \nCooperative Societies. \nLoans for the total amount of Rs553,750,000 have been approved by the DMB Ltd. for \n25 beneficiaries under the scheme. These include two cooperative societies which \nbenefitted from a loan of Rs4,104,000 for the replantation of some 69.3 arpents of land \nunder sugarcane plantation. \n(ii) \nNew Agricultural Loan Scheme \nA maximum loan of Rs10 million to finance up to 90% of the cost of a project is \noffered to individuals, companies and cooperative societies to finance any activity \nlinked to agriculture and agro-industry. The interest rate is 3.5% per annum and the \nrepayment period is up to seven years, including a moratorium of one year. \nOnly one application for Rs1,285,000 has been received at the level of the DBM Ltd. \nunder this scheme and same has already been disbursed. \n(iii) Rehabilitation Loan Scheme \nThe Scheme has been operated on two occasions, that is, following the passage of \ncyclones Batsirai and Belal, respectively.  The loans carried interest rates of 0.5% per \nannum and 1% per annum, respectively. \nTwo cooperative societies have benefited from the loans for the aggregate sum of \nRs710,000. \nMy Ministry also offers various facilities to encourage and support those planters who \nare willing to initiate plantation activities. These include – \n\n147 \n \n(i) \na 75% subsidy offered to planters on the selling price of onion, potato, garlic and \nbean seeds to alleviate the significant financial cost involved in the purchase of \nseeds; \n(ii) \na subsidy of Rs3,000/arpent up to a maximum of five arpents provided to \nregistered small food crop growers for agricultural land mechanisation works on \ntheir fields; \n(iii) a subsidy of 50% on the cost of fertilisers provided to vegetable, fruit and flower \ngrowers for one crop cycle under both open field and protected culture, and \n(iv) a 75% subsidy provided on the purchase of locally produced fertilisers (liquid \nfertilisers, bio fertilisers and composts) to help planters shift from imported \nchemical fertilisers. \nIn view of the crucial role played by Cooperative Societies in facilitating financial \naccess for small and medium-scale planters, the Ministry of Industry, SME and Cooperatives \nalso implements grant schemes to boost local food production, such as – \n(i) \nthe Boost to Local Production Scheme under which a grant of Rs300,000 is \nprovided for the purchase of equipment, and \n(ii) \nthe Seedlings Production Scheme whereby a grant of Rs250,000 is provided for the \nsetting up or consolidation of Seedling Production Units for vegetables and fruits. \nPRIMARY & SECONDARY SCHOOLS – REPORTED DRUG CASES (2015-2024)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/49",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 49,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/49) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to drug in primary \nand secondary schools, he will state the number of reported cases thereof between 2015 to \n2024, indicating the preventive measures being envisaged.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nCLUNY GOVERNMENT SCHOOL – CORRODED SHED – RENOVATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/50",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 50,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/50) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the dilapidated \nstate of the shed found in the compound of the Cluny Government School, he will state if \nconsideration will be given for the renovation of the shed for the safety of the staff and \nstudents at the school. \n\n148",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed that the shed being referred to in the compound of Cluny \nGovernment School comprises two components – \n(i) \na Corrugated Iron Sheet structure, and \n(ii) \nold classrooms no longer in use. \nThe shed is used mainly as a covered link for pupils and staff to access the toilet block. \nFollowing site visit carried out by officers of my Ministry in May 2024, it was noted \nthat the metallic structures and corrugated profile sheets were heavily corroded. Accordingly, \na joint site visit was also carried out by officers of the Ministry of National Infrastructure and \nmy Ministry in July 2024. \nIn order to address the issue, it was recommended that the shed be subject to renovation \nwhich involves – \n(i) \ndismantling of the damaged iron sheets and metal bars, and installation of new \nones; \n(ii) \npainting works, and \n(iii) upgrading of floor (laying of screed and application of floor dressing paint). \nThe necessary procedures are being followed for the implementation of the project \nduring this year. \n \nCANCER SURGERIES – MEDICAL TEAM – CHENNAI, INDIA",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/51",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 51,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/51) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to cancer, he will state if a medical team \nfrom Chennai, India, is expected to perform surgeries on patients suffering from cancer \nduring the month of February 2025 and, if so, give details thereon, indicating the number of \npatients concerned.",
      "answer": "Reply: I wish to inform the House that two teams from Chennai, India will be on \nofficial visit to Mauritius in the month of February 2025. \n \nThe first team, which includes Professor Balaji Subramoniam Muthiah, Director of \nBalaji Dental and Craniofacial Hospital, and Professor Deepak Chandrasekharan, Professor \nand Head of the Department of Orthodontics at SRM Kattankulathur Dental College, will be \nin Mauritius from 03 to 08 February 2025. During their visit, Professor Balaji Subramoniam \nMuthiah will be performing complex oral cancer surgeries, along with cranio-maxillofacial \nsurgical, rehabilitative, and reconstructive procedures at both the New Cancer Centre and \n\n149 \n \nVictoria Hospital. The latter is expected to review and operate on 20 complex cases, \naddressing critical medical conditions that require highly specialised expertise. \nThe second team comprises Dr. Balaji Ramani and Dr. Sriprakash Duraisamy, who are \nexperts in Head & Neck Oncology, focusing on oral malignancies, thyroid disorders, parotid \ntumors, and reconstructive surgeries and will be in Mauritius from 12 to 16 February 2025. \nThe team is expected to review and operate on around 10 complicated cases. \nPrior to the visits, consultative meetings have been held at the New Cancer Centre to \nensure the proper staffing and coordination. Nursing staff have been temporarily redeployed \nto support the surgical team, and two anaesthetists will be rostered to assist with the intricate \nprocedures. Additionally, our local specialists will be involved in assisting with these \ncomplex surgeries. \nDuring their stay, the visiting medical experts will also conduct an assessment of the \nclinical facilities and provide valuable recommendations to ensure the infrastructure is \nprepared for future complex surgeries. These insights will be crucial in planning for \nupcoming visits, which will address other surgical specialties within oncology. \nThese collaborations represent significant steps toward enhancing the capabilities of \nMauritius in handling complex oncology cases and improving healthcare services for the \nfuture. \nMAURITIUS FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION – ELECTIVE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, 27 \nNOV 2024 – COMPOSITION & PROCEDURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/52",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 52,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/52) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Mauritius Football Association, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom information as to – \n(a) \nwhether all procedures were followed with regard to the Elective General \nAssembly thereof held on 27 November 2024, indicating the –  \n(i) \nnames of the candidates for the post of President of the Association, and  \n(ii) \nthe reasons as to why the candidature of Mr E. R. for the post was \nrejected, and \n(b) \nthe composition of the newly elected managing committee of the Association.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nVACOAS –URBAN TERMINAL – PROJECT STATUS \n\n150",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/53",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 53,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/53) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the development and operation of a \nmodern urban terminal at Vacoas, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nMunicipal Council of Vacoas-Phoenix, information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Reply: The outgoing government had, on 13 February 2024, launched a Request for \nProposal (RFP) inviting proposals from potential promoters having the necessary experience, \nexpertise and resources for the development and operation (Design, Build, Finance, Manage \nand Operate) of an integrated Urban Terminal at Vacoas. \nThe closing date for the submission of proposals was fixed on 14 May 2024.  However, \nfollowing a request from one potential promoter, the closing date was extended up to 31 May \n2024. \nAs at the closing date for the submission of the proposal, only one proposal from the \nJoint Venture “JV LMH Vacoas” was received. \nAfter examining the observations in the Bid Evaluation Report, the Ministry took note \nthat the Promoter had a few queries with respect to the requirements in the RFP, which had to \nbe addressed, prior to deciding as to whether a Notification of Award could be made to the \nPromoter. \nIn the light of the queries raised by the Promoter and the fact that no decision has not \nyet been made as to whether to make a Notification of Award to the Promoter, I wish to \ninform the House that my Ministry would apprise Cabinet on the status of the various Urban \nTerminal Projects based on the advice of the Attorney General’s Office, which has been \nsought on 18 December 2024. \nThe Attorney General’s Office has requested further clarifications from my Ministry, \nand same are being attended to. \nDISABILITY PENSION – ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA – REVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/54",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 54,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/54) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity whether, in \nregard to disability pension, he will state if consideration will be given for the review of the \neligibility criteria to benefit same, indicating the number of complaints received from the \nbeneficiaries of disability pension to date.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/31) \n\n151 \n \n \nCOVID-19 – RENAL DIALYSIS PATIENT’S DEATH – FACT-FINDING \nCOMMITTEE REPORT – ACTIONS ENVISAGED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/55",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 55,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/55) Dr. F. Aumeer \n(Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the report of the \nFact-Finding Committee on the death of renal dialysis patient during COVID-19 pandemic \nlaid on the table of the National Assembly on 20 December 2024, he will state the actions \ntaken and/or being envisaged by his Ministry on the report.",
      "answer": "Reply: I wish to inform the House that, following the tabling of the Fact-Finding \nCommittee Report and the subsequent Reports of Enquiries conducted by the Medical \nNegligence Standing Committee regarding the death of dialysis patients at New Souillac \nHospital during the COVID-19 Pandemic, my Ministry has taken appropriate decisive action \nregarding the matter at hand.  \nAfter tabling the report of the Fact-Finding Committee in Parliament, my Ministry has \nreferred the case to the Office of the Commissioner of Police to initiate a comprehensive and \nin-depth Police Enquiry, so that responsibilities could be situated. Once the report of the \nEnquiry is received, action will be initiated to deal with the culprits. \nThis action reflects our commitment to upholding the highest standards of \naccountability and transparency, particularly when it comes to issues as serious as medical \nnegligence. The police investigation will ensure that all relevant facts are thoroughly \nexamined, and that those responsible are held to account in accordance with the law. \nThe safety and well-being of our citizens, particularly in healthcare settings, remain a \ntop priority for this government. My Ministry will continue to act swiftly and judiciously to \naddress any concerns and to safeguard the trust of the public in our health institutions. \n \nRODRIGUES – SPORTS ADVANCEMENT – FEDERATIONS AND \nASSOCIATIONS LIST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025",
        "tuesday-04-february-2025",
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/56",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 56,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/56) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nYouth and Sports whether, in regard to the advancement of sports in Rodrigues, he will state \nand table the list of sports federations and associations with which his Ministry has been \ncollaborating therefor, indicating the financial assistance extended to the sports federations \nand associations. \n\n152",
      "answer": "Reply: Section 26 of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act, provides, inter-alia, that \nthe Rodrigues Regional Assembly shall be responsible for the formulation of policy in \nrespect of youth and sports. In Financial Year 2024-2025, an amount of Rs111.2 million was \nallocated for the promotion of Sports and Sports for All by the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly. \nHowever, despite this autonomy in the budget of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly for \nyouth and sports, I am pleased to inform the House that several National Sports Federations \nallocate a portion of their annual grants provided by my Ministry to support the advancement \nof sports in Rodrigues. This is a commendable recognition of the immense sporting talent that \nthe island of Rodrigues possesses.  \nIndeed, Rodrigues is an island brimming with potential, and its athletes continue to \ndemonstrate exceptional skill and dedication on both national and international stages. \nAdditionally, my Ministry provides facilities such as airport transfers and board and \nlodging when our fellow athletes from Rodrigues come to Mauritius to train or to participate \nin competitions. \nA list of the federations thereof together with the financial assistance to their sports \ndiscipline in Rodrigues is being placed in the Library of the National Assembly. \n \nMONKEYS – YEARLY EXPORTATION & REVENUE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025",
        "tuesday-04-february-2025",
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/57",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 57,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/57) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to monkeys, he will state the number of monkeys exported yearly, since 2014 to date, \nindicating in each case the – \n(a) \naverage selling price thereof, and \n(b) \nannual revenue generated from the sale of the monkeys.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nLA SOURCE FOOTBALL PLAYGROUND – PLAYERS’ SAFETY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/58",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 58,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/58) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to La Source Football playground, he \nwill state – \n\n153 \n \n(a) \nif he has been made aware of – \n(i) \nthe non-compliance thereof to be classified as a football field, and \n(ii) \nthe construction of a concrete barrier at the playground, and \n(b) \nthe measures being envisaged for the safety of the players thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nAFRICAN UNION GENERAL ASSEMBLY – MAURITIUS’ DIPLOMATIC & \nECONOMIC TIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/59",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 59,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade",
      "question": "(No. B/59) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade whether, in \nregard to African strategy and the participation of Mauritius in the forthcoming General \nAssembly of the African Union, he will state the initiatives being envisaged by Government \nto enhance diplomatic and economic cooperation/ties with other African countries.",
      "answer": "Reply: The 38th Ordinary Session of the Assembly of Heads of State and Government \nof the African Union will be held on 15 to 16 February 2025 in Addis Ababa under the theme \n\"Building a united front to advance the cause of justice and payment of reparations to \nAfricans.\"  \nThis theme echoes well with our long-standing struggle for Mauritius to complete its \ndecolonisation process so that it can effectively and fully exercise its sovereignty over its \nentire territory, including the Chagos Archipelago.  \nIt is important to remind ourselves that African Union Member States have always been \nvery supportive in respect of the Chagos issue. This is why we never fail to express our \nsincere gratitude to our fellow brothers and sisters from the continent each time the \nopportunity arises, at the bilateral, regional and multilateral levels. \nThe agenda of the upcoming Summit will cover several issues of direct relevance to \nMauritius, namely Climate Change, Reform of the United Nations Security Council and AU \nmembership in G20.  \nIn line with the promotion of developmental diplomacy under the Government \nProgramme of 2025-2029, our participation in the forthcoming AU Summit will enable \nMauritius to express our concerns, interests and vulnerabilities as an African Small Island \nDeveloping State; and explore ways and means to tap into the potential offered by intra-\nAfrican exchanges, particularly in terms of trade. The AU Summit will also provide us with \n\n154 \n \nan opportunity to seek support for the candidatures of Mauritius in regional and international \norganisations.  \nAt AU Summit in Addis Ababa, the Mauritius delegation will engage with like-minded \npartners in the margins of the Summit to mutually explore new avenues of cooperation as \nwell as consolidating existing ties.  \nThe strengthening of relations between Mauritius and other African countries has \nalways been a cornerstone of our foreign policy since our independence in 1968.  \nThe destiny of Mauritius is inextricably linked to the future development of our region \nand of our continent. Being part of Africa, Mauritius is called upon to devise a continental \nstrategy for the mutual benefit of the Peoples of Africa. We are part of Africa by geography \nand by destiny.  \nAs Members of the House would be aware, Africa is one of the fastest growing \nconsumer markets in the world and has eight of the world's fastest growing economies. It \nrepresents a potential market of over 1.3 billion people, with consumer expenditure expecting \nto reach $2.1 trillion by 2025 and $2.5 trillion by 2030.  \nThe future of Africa lies in the promotion of Intra-Africa trade and investment. \nGovernment would therefore endeavour to further strengthen economic integration within \nAfrica at bilateral, regional and continental levels.  \nThe African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) provides Mauritius access to a vast \nsingle market offering immense opportunities for trade, investment, and industrial growth. \nKey initiatives include addressing trade barriers, harmonising regulatory frameworks, and \nimproving freight and connectivity within Africa. Mauritius will engage with other African \ncountries on the possibility of developing robust digital infrastructure that will facilitate e-\ncommerce and cross-border trade.  \nAs enunciated in the Government Programme 2025-2029, Government will promote \nregional cooperation and enhance economic integration at regional level, namely within the \nCommon Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA), the Southern African \nDevelopment Community (SADC), and the Indian Ocean Commission (IOC), reinforcing our \nrole as a regional trade and investment hub.  \nIn pursuit of a stronger and more dynamic continental strategy, Government is actively \nundertaking several initiatives to enhance diplomatic and economic cooperation with African \n\n155 \n \ncountries. These initiatives align with our firm commitment to regional integration, economic \ndiplomacy, and sustainable development.  \nAt the diplomatic level, Mauritius is engaging in high-level discussions with other \nAfrican countries to deepen bilateral relations. These engagements will serve to reinforce our \npartnerships, advance common interests, and explore new areas of collaboration.  \nMauritius is also leveraging existing joint commissions with countries such as Ghana, \nKenya, and South Africa as structured platforms to drive cooperation in trade, investment, \nconnectivity, and development.  \nA key component of our continental strategy is enhancing air and maritime \nconnectivity. Government will explore the feasibility of establishing new shipping routes and \nair links with African coastal states and collaborating with African port authorities to \nstrengthen maritime trade networks.  \nAs a member State of the African Union, Mauritius looks forward to participate \neffectively in the Assembly of the Heads of State and Government to achieve the objectives \nof the African Union, namely – \n(i) \nto achieve greater unity, cohesion and solidarity among the African countries; \n(ii) \nto defend the sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of its Member \nStates, and  \n(iii) \nto accelerate the political and socio-economic integration of the continent. \n \nLIVERPOOL FOOTBALL ACADEMY PROJECT – INVESTMENT & OUTCOME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/60",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 60,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/60) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Liverpool Football \nAcademy Project, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the sum \ninvested into the Academy up to December 2024, indicating the outcome derived under this \nproject for Mauritius.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nTYPE 1 DIABETES – CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORS & INSULIN \nPUMPS PROVISION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/61",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 61,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/61) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to Type 1 Diabetes, \nhe will state the number of persons below the age of 18 and above diagnosed with Type 1 \n\n156 \n \nDiabetes, indicating if consideration will be given for the provision of continuous glucose \nmonitors and insulin pumps to patients suffering this chronic condition.",
      "answer": "Reply: In the Budget Speech 2023-2024, it was announced that Continuous Glucose \nMonitoring machines would be provided to some 1,000 Type1 Diabetes patients and that \nsome 450 high-risk diabetic patients would be provided with insulin pumps. However, \naccording to available records at my Ministry, 1,061 patients are currently undergoing \ntreatment for Type 1 Diabetes. \nI am informed that until now, the budgetary measure could not be implemented as \nseveral factors had to be taken into consideration, namely – \n(a) \nThe cost associated with implementing the project. Insulin pumps and \nContinuous Glucose Monitoring machines and the associated consumables are \ncostly. Even in high income countries, these devices are generally available \nthrough private medical insurance, depending on the level of insurance \ncoverage; \n(b) \nThe proper and safe use of these advanced technologies require a system with \ntrained Endocrinologists, diabetes nurses and appropriate clinical environment \nto download the glucose data from the Continuous Glucose Monitors, and our \nhealthcare system in Mauritius is not currently adapted to implement this \nproject; \n(c) \nIntroducing new services, the safety of patients has to be taken into \nconsideration as new technologies may lead to an increase to stress, anxiety and \nburnout which, in turn, can lead to psychological problems; \n(d) \nIn case of misuse, the automatic administration of insulin by the pump may lead \nto uneasiness, hypoglycaemia and potentially to critical conditions, including \ndeath; \n(e) \nComprehensive education programs for patients, healthcare officers and \ndieticians in diabetes technology would have to be provided. This awareness \nprogram should include training on the use of diabetes management tools and \ntechnologies, workshops and webinars to share experiences and knowledge, and \n(f) \nFurthermore, personalised training would have to be conducted for patients by \nconsidering their lifestyles factors, age, comorbidities and personal preferences. \nMy Ministry has considered all risks associated with the use of insulin pumps and \nContinuous Glucose Monitors. Accordingly, the proposal for Type 1 diabetic patients to be \n\n157 \n \nprovided with Continuous Glucose Monitors is being given due consideration. This project \nwould cost around Rs120 million annually and would be implemented in a phase-wise \napproach. \n \n \n\n158 \n \nVALLÉE DES PRÊTRES – INCINERATOR – OPERATIONALITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/62",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 62,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/62) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the incinerator \nsituated at Vallée des Prêtres, he will state the current state of the incinerator, indicating if it \nis operational and, if not, since when.",
      "answer": "Reply: I refer the hon. Member to my response to PQ I B/9 from the Sitting of 10 \nDecember 2024, in which I provided a detailed update regarding the electric cremation \nincinerators. That response included information on the number of incinerators installed, \nthose currently out of service, and the progress on necessary repairs. \nI have been advised by the Municipal City Council of Port Louis that the incinerator at \nthe Cipailles Brûlé Cremation Ground in Vallée des Prêtres has not been operational since \n2023. This issue is of serious concern as the incinerator has repeatedly broken down due to \nthe lack of a proper maintenance contract. \nConsidering that there are 16 incinerators nationwide requiring maintenance, my \nMinistry has established a priority list. This list is based on the absence of alternative \nincinerators within local authorities and the availability of qualified contractors to perform \nthe repairs. Priority is, therefore, given to those areas where no other incinerator is available. \nThe repairs and maintenance for the incinerator at Cipailles Brûlé are scheduled to \ncommence at the end of February 2025 and are expected to be completed within \napproximately one month. \nCATARACT SURGERY – WAITING LIST & COSTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/63",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 63,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/63) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to cataracts surgeries in Mauritius, he will \n– \n(a) \ngive a list of public hospitals where same are being performed, indicating the \nnumber of patients on the waiting list for surgery, and \n(b) \nstate if his Ministry is having recourse to the services of private hospitals for \ncataract surgery and, if so, indicate the total cost incurred, if any, as at date.",
      "answer": "Reply: I wish to inform the House that, until recently, cataract surgeries were primarily \nbeing conducted at Subramania Bharati Eye Hospital and New Souillac Hospital.  \nHowever, in an effort to reduce the waiting list in a sustainable manner, as well as to \ndecentralise these essential services for the benefit of patients, my Ministry kickstarted \ncataract surgery services on 17 January 2025 at Flacq Hospital. Presently, Flacq hospital is \n\n159 \n \nperforming 13 cataract surgeries daily, contributing significantly to meeting the needs of our \ncitizens. \nThe number of patients on the waiting list of cataract surgeries is as follows – \n(i) \n1,173 patients at Subramania Bharati Eye Hospital as at 26 January 2025; \n(ii) \n477 patients at New Souillac Hospital as at 26 January 2025, and \n(iii) \n121 patients at Flacq Hospital as at 03 February 2025. (A total of 108 cataract \nsurgeries have already been completed since 17 January 2025). \nI am informed that in 2023, 1,500 patients were referred to a private clinic for cataract \nsurgeries to the tune of Rs19,000 per cataract surgery, amounting to a total of Rs28,500,000. \nIn the year 2024, 4,200 patients were referred to three private clinics for cataract surgeries. A \ntotal of 1,400 patients were referred to each of the three private clinics at the cost of Rs21,000 \nper cataract surgery, amounting to a total of Rs29,400,000 payable to each clinic. \nThe last batch of patients is expected to be completed by mid-February. The total cost \nfor referral of cataract surgery patients since 2023 is to the tune of Rs116,700,000. \n \nEMMANUEL ANQUETIL GOVERNMENT SCHOOL – TELEPHONE \nLANDLINE CONNECTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/64",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 64,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/64) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port Louis Maritime & Port Louis \nEast) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether in regard to the \nEmmanuel Anquetil Government School, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to if the telephone landline of the school has been connected to the telecom \nnetwork and, if so, since when.",
      "answer": "Reply:  I am informed that the telephone landline at Emmanuel Anquetil Government \nSchool in Zone 1, which was disconnected on 23 September 2024, has been reconnected to \nthe telecom network since 24 January 2025. \nRIVIÈRE DU POSTE – PONT ROUGE BRIDGE – REPARATION & \nREHABILITATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/65",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 65,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/65) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the “Pont Rouge” bridge at \nRivière du Poste, he will state if consideration will be given for the repair and rehabilitation \nof the bridge, indicating the expected start and completion dates of the work.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n\n160 \n \nLOCAL AUTHORITIES – STAFF RECRUITMENT IRREGULARITIES – \nYEAR 2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025",
        "tuesday-15-july-2025",
        "tuesday-04-february-2025",
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/66",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 66,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/66) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the local authorities, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to the total number of staff recruited in each local \nauthority during the year 2024, indicating if these recruitments were accounted for in the \nbudget for the corresponding financial year.",
      "answer": "Reply: I have been informed by the Local Government Service Commission that a total \nof 1,765 appointments were made, and 32 staff members were promoted within local \nauthorities during the calendar year 2024, covering the period from 01 January to 03 October, \nthe eve of the issuance of the Writ of Elections. A detailed breakdown of these appointments, \ncategorised by local authority, is being tabled for the information of the House.  \nI wish to inform the House that these recruitments were accounted for in the financial \nyears 2023/2024 and 2024/2025, during their respective budget preparation and approval \nprocesses. Additionally, the previous government approved the creation of 998 new positions \nwithin local authorities in 2024. Given that this was a general election year, separate financial \nclearances for these positions were sought and obtained on 24 April, 30 May, 11 June, 02 \nJuly, 15 July, and 23 September for the year 2024. \nHowever, the Secretary of the Local Government Service Commission has since \nreported serious irregularities in the recruitment process at the Commission between January \n2022 and October 2024. These irregularities include the 998 appointments made in various \ngrades in the months leading up to the issuance of the Writ of Elections. \nIn light of these concerns, the Local Government Service Commission formally sought \nlegal advice from the Attorney General's Office on 10 December 2024 regarding the legality \nof these appointments. The Attorney General's Office has advised that all decisions taken by \nthe Chairperson of the Local Government Service Commission regarding appointments and \npromotions under delegated powers are legally void. \nFurthermore, the Secretary of the Local Government Service Commission has \nrequested further clarification from the Attorney General's Office on the legal implications of \nthese appointments and promotions. \nOnce the final legal advice is received, the matter will be referred to Cabinet for \nappropriate consideration, and the necessary policy decisions will be taken to ensure that due \nprocess is followed in addressing these irregularities. \n \n\n161 \n \nMAHEBOURG MARKET – RENOVATION WORK – FINANCIAL CLEARANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/67",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 67,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer) The Honourable the Attorney-General – Whether, in regard to the swearing-in of Affidavit, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the persons who are eligible to act as Registered Commissioners of Oath, indicating if consideration will be given to allow Senior Attorneys/Notaries to administer oath so as to reduce the waiting time and work load of Court Officers? PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS PAGE 19 of 19 Parliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "addressed_to": "",
      "question": "Whether, in regard to the swearing-in of Affidavit, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain information as to the persons who are eligible to act \nas Registered Commissioners of Oath, indicating if consideration will be \ngiven to allow Senior Attorneys/Notaries to administer oath so as to \nreduce the waiting time and work load of Court Officers? \n \n \n \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS \n                                                 \nPAGE 19 of 19 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": "NOT ANSWERED",
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025",
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/68",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 68,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/68) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the works for the renovation of the \nMahebourg Market, he will state if his Ministry is in presence of any request from the District \nCouncil of Grand Port for financial clearance for the renovation work of the market and, if so, \nindicate where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nWRIT OF ELECTIONS 2024 – RECRUITMENT & PROMOTION –ENQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/69",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 69,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms",
      "question": "(No. B/69) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms whether, in regard to the \nrecruitment and promotion exercises carried out in 2024, he will state – \n(a)  the number thereof made after the issue of the writs of election in 2024 by the \n(i)  Public Service Commission, and \n(ii) other public bodies, indicating if same will be reviewed, and \n(b) \nif an enquiry will be carried out to determine the legality of these recruitments \nand promotions.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nROUTES NO. 10A, 99 & 137 – BUS SERVICES PROVISION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/70",
      "sitting_id": "04-february-2025",
      "date": "2025-02-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 70,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/70) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the irregular bus services in the \nregion of Plein Bois, Carreau Esnouf and Carreau Accacia, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information as to whether \nconsideration will be given for the provision of a regular bus service along Route No. 10A, \nL’Escalier/Plein Bois to Curepipe; Route 137, Carreau Accacia to Curepipe via Rose-Belle \nand Route 99, from Carreau Accacia to Mahebourg, respectively.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/71",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 71,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/71) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the proposed review of the Public Procurement Act to prevent abuses, he will state \nif consideration will be given to amending Schedule 2 of the Act forthwith to include all \nState-Owned Enterprises and Special Purpose Vehicles not currently listed therein.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Member for the question. \nIndeed, there have been numerous abuses of the public procurement system by the previous \nGovernment.  \n\n23 \n \nOne of the most striking and conspicuous abuse has been during the COVID-19 period \nfor the purchase of medical supplies and equipment.  \nMadam Speaker, that is why in the Government Programme of 2025-2029, we have \nannounced that the Public Procurement Act will be reviewed. Our aim is to prevent abuses, \nstrengthen accountability, and enhance transparency and integrity in the public procurement \nsystem. \nThe review will also aim at aligning our procurement system with international best \npractices. It will enforce better contract execution and supplier performance.  \nWith regard to the question of whether consideration will be given to amending \nSchedule 2 of the Act, I wish to clarify to the House that all the Schedules, including the \nSecond Schedule, previously under the Public Procurement Act (PPA) were repealed as from \n20 July 2023, and incorporated under the Public Procurement Regulations 2008. \nMadam Speaker, clearly, the current public procurement system needs to be improved. \nSome issues need to be addressed urgently. \nFirst, the current legislation is based on an outdated 1994 United Nations Model Law \non Procurement. \nSecond, there is a lack of oversight over excluded and exempt public entities. \nThird, there are too many entities dependent on public funds, which are not covered by \nthe Public Procurement Act. It appears, Madam Speaker, that a few of them may have been \ndeliberately excluded so that nobody can see what was happening. \nFourth, the system is discriminatory. There is no level playing field. I will give you an \nexample: housing construction is being undertaken by the National Housing Development \nCompany Ltd (NHDC), which is under the PPA; however, there is a New Social Living \nDevelopment Co. Ltd (NSLD), which is also responsible for housing construction but does \nnot fall under the PPA. How is that possible? We do not understand! \nSimilarly, the NDU is responsible for drains construction and operates under the PPA, \nwhilst the Drains Infrastructure Construction Ltd (DICL), also involved in drains \nconstruction, does not. One can only guess, Madam Speaker, why such a discriminatory \n\n24 \n \napproach – it beggars belief. We know what has happened. We know. We have heard just \nnow how many millions have been – I don’t know –whether pocketed or wasted or whatever. \nMadam Speaker, during the review of the public procurement system, consideration \nwill be given to cover, as far as possible, all entities which involve public funds for their \noperations, and for which Government is accountable in Parliament. Unlike the previous \nGovernment, we will make this accountable. This approach is also in line with our plan to \nintroduce a legal framework for greater fiscal responsibility. \nTo make it clear, unlike the previous regime, with this Government, generally \nwhenever there are public funds involved, there should be accountability for every rupee and \nevery cent that is spent from public funds. This was never the case before. \nI can assure the House that Government will have an oversight on the procurement by \nall entities using public funds. \nMadam Speaker, I wish also to reassure the House that this Government is fully \ncommitted to ensure that there is a transparent and effective public procurement system in \nplace which promotes value for money both in terms of monetary value and quality. Very \noften, we forget about quality. The cheapest is not necessarily the best. So, monetary value, \nquality, accountability, integrity, fairness, and efficiency in the use of public funds at all \nlevels.  \nI have no doubt, Madam Speaker, that these reforms will reaffirm public trust in the \npublic procurement system. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, I am glad to hear from the hon. Prime Minister that he \nintends to have a level playing field for public procurement wherever public funds are \ninvolved.  \nBut as a matter of urgency, will the hon. Prime Minister consider adding all those SOEs \nand Special Purpose Vehicles that exist today since the legislation was enacted in 2006 by his \nGovernment and have not been specifically included under the application of the Act, and \nwhether these would be done now as a matter of urgency, notwithstanding future amendments \nthat may be brought? \n\n25 \n \nThe Prime Minister: This is precisely what I said. Wherever there is public money \ninvolved, every rupee and every cent of public money which is spent will fall under the new \nPPA Act. \nMadam Speaker: Your next question! You have another one? \nMr A. Duval: Yes, on the same subject. Madam Speaker, it can be brought by way of \nregulation. The question is very direct: can the hon. Prime Minister tell us what is the hold-up \nfor adding all those SPVs and SOEs now under the control of the Public Procurement? \nThe Prime Minister: For ten years, nobody thought about it! Now, when we are doing \nit, you are in a rush to know why and when? \nAn hon. Member: Exact! \nThe Prime Minister: We will do it when we are ready to do it! \nMadam Speaker: Okay, next question now! \nMr Bhagwan: … tonn manze bwar kan to ti Speaker! \nMr Mohamed: Happy hour! \nFREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT – PROPOSED INTRODUCTION – \nCONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSES BAN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/72",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 72,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/72) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the proposed introduction of a Freedom of Information Act to enhance transparency \nin relation to the decisions of public institutions, he will state if consideration will be given to \nbanning the use of confidentiality clauses in transactions involving public funds, directly or \nindirectly, except for matters related to defence and national security.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, let me state at the very beginning that \ntransparency and accountability will be the core values of the actions of this Government. \nWe have already announced in the Government Programme 2025-2029 that a Freedom \nof Information Act will be introduced for the purpose of enhancing transparency in relation to \ndecisions of all public institutions. \n\n26 \n \nThe House would appreciate that Freedom of Information Acts lay the principle of \naccess to information, but they also embody exceptions, as you rightly pointed out. A perusal \nof the existing legislation in the United Kingdom, the United States, and other democratic \ncountries will show that these Acts come with some exceptions. This is universally the \npractice and is accepted. Exceptions are expressly spelt out in such Acts for the purpose of \npublic order, for maintaining stability, for respecting other legal and ethical obligations, and \nmore importantly, for the protection of basic rights of the individual.  \nIn Mauritius, as with the legislation pertaining to this matter in other democratic \ncountries, our Data Protection Act lays clearly the universal principle of protection of \npersonal and sensitive data of the individual. Exemptions to this right are also clearly and \nlimitatively laid down in the said Act.  \nWhen the Freedom of Information Act will be introduced, it will be in conformity with \nthe best practices in other jurisdictions. As the hon. Member rightly says in his question, it \nwill have to strike a balance between transparency and other interests such as, national \nsecurity, public safety, and defence. The Act will also include exceptions aiming at protecting \nthe fundamental rights of individuals.  \nMadam Speaker, transactions, whether they involve public funds or not, usually contain \nconfidentiality clauses though this is not a mandatory requirement of the law of contract. \nHowever, confidentiality clauses are inserted in contracts for a wide variety of reasons, and \nthese are universally accepted.  \nTherefore, a blanket ban on the use of confidentiality clauses in transactions except for \nmatters related to defence and national security as proposed in the question, whilst desirable, \nmay have to be examined in the broader context of exceptions applicable to such types of \nlegislations, whilst ensuring that the principles of accountability and transparency are not \nundermined. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, the hon. Prime Minister realises that with the use of \npublic funds, there has to be accountability. And in the past, whether the last government …  \nMadam Speaker: Question! Question, please! \nMr A. Duval: Yes, I am coming up.  \n\n27 \n \n… whether the last government or the government before that have used confidentiality \nclauses with regard to contracts and, therefore, have relied on that so as not to allow \nParliament to have its function of oversight.  \nTherefore, the question, Madam Speaker, is whether he understates that any contract \nwith regard to public funds will not use confidentiality clauses? Because we have seen in the \npast that Mauritius has invoked confidentiality clauses while the other party had no problem \nin disclosing the information. So, can he undertake that such use of confidentiality clauses \nwill not be used? \nThe Prime Minister: I just explained at length what we intend to do. You, yourself, in \nyour question, say: ‘except for matters relating to defence and national security’. I did say \nthat also, but there are also some confidentiality clauses in some cases which need to be \nlooked at very properly. This is what I said.  \nMr A. Duval: If I may, Madam Speaker. I’ll take an example. Let’s take the example \nof Côte d'Or Ltd where there has been…  \nMadam Speaker: You are on slippery ground!  \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: … there has been not only … \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Ala li tir pese boug la!  \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: I can take the example of Jin Fei also where there has been relied …  \nMadam Speaker: We want you to put a question! \nMr A. Duval: I am putting the question, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker: No, you are stating! \nMr A. Duval: The question is that wherever public funds are involved, of course, \nwhere the matter relates to security is one thing – acceptable! But wherever there are public \nfunds, it should, one, fall under the Public Procurement Act, and it should not be the subject \nof confidentiality clauses because the public has the right to know. Therefore, will he \ncontemplate not having any exception other than what we both agree on, national security \nand public order? But for others, procurement of services and procurement of machinery and \nequipment should not be subject to confidentiality clauses at all! \n\n28 \n \nThe Prime Minister: Exactly what you said! Look at what happened during COVID-\n19, I have just mentioned that in the other question. You know what happened; still, you \njoined the Party that was doing it.  \nAn hon. Member: Kokin! \nThe Prime Minister: Then you didn’t ask any questions. Now, you want to ask me \nquestions when we are actually correcting the mistakes that you have made. We are going to \nbe accountable for every rupee and cent that is spent, except for what I said just now.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Hon. Second Member for Rodrigues, please! \nRODRIGUES - POLICE OFFICERS - SHORTAGE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/73",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 73,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/73) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Police Force in \nRodrigues, he will – \n(a) \nstate if he has been aware of the shortage of Police Officers posted thereat, and  \n(b) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information \nas to the – \n(i)  number of Rodriguan Police Officers who, after completion of the Police \ntraining, have requested their transfer to Rodrigues, and  \n(ii)   action being envisaged to address the issue of shortage and, if so, when.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed by the Commissioner of Police that there is a shortage of personnel within the Force \nitself. The shortage of Police Officers is not limited to Rodrigues only, but also across the \nwhole Republic. The number of vacancies for which funds are available is 3,381. The main \nreasons for the shortage of Police Officers are due to many officers proceeding on retirement \non an annual basis, sometimes because of the policy of the previous government; they retired \nearly because they were being victimised. Then, there is also a lack of interest from qualified \ncandidates to join the Force. In the last recruitment exercise, which was held in August of last \nyear, some 1,000 Police Officers were expected to be enlisted, but only 496 eligible \ncandidates were enlisted by the Disciplined Forces Service Commission at that time. Now, \nout of the 496 candidates, 45 have already resigned from the Force. \nThere are currently 236 Police Officers posted in the six Police Stations in Rodrigues. \nThe Commissioner of Police considers, at the moment, that Rodrigues is adequately staffed, \n\n29 \n \ntaking into consideration the ratio of Police Officers to the population, which is currently 1 \nPolice Officer to 188 Rodriguans. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that \nout of 148 Rodriguan Police Officers who are currently posted in Mauritius, 23 have \nrequested that they be transferred to Rodrigues. The requests are being considered by the \nCommissioner of Police and will happen after the next passing out exercise which will be \nconducted shortly, and will be based on operational exigencies. \nMadam Speaker: One! Just one!  \nMr François: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I thank the hon. Prime Minister for his \nanswer. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to the increase in the number of vehicles on our roads in \nRodrigues, there is an urgency for the presence of more Police Officers on our roads. Will the \nhon. Prime Minister see to it with the Commissioner of Police and the Divisional Commander \nthereat, as a matter of urgency and security, to deploy more Police Officers on our roads \ndespite, as I said, there being a shortage of Police Officers thereat? \nMadam Speaker: C’est le miracle ! Il cherche un miracle ! \nThe Prime Minister: I cannot order the Commissioner of Police on the operational \nexigencies; he will decide. But I will pass on your message. \nMadam Speaker: Message will be passed!  \nOkay, now we have hon. First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nREHABILITATION YOUTH CENTRES – LOW NUMBER ADMISSIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/74",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 74,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/74) Mrs A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Rehabilitation Youth Centres (RYC), he will state if he has been made aware of the \nlow number of admissions at the Centres since the coming into operation of the Children’s \nAct 2020 and, if so, state the measures being envisaged in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, as you rightly said, with your permission, I will \nreply to PQ B/74 and PQ B/91 together as they relate to the same subject matter.  \nThe Rehabilitation Youth Centre (RYC) falls under the responsibility of the \nCommissioner of Prisons and operates under the aegis of the Prime Minister’s Office. It is \n\n30 \n \ngoverned by the Reforms Institutions Act 1988. Its purpose is to rehabilitate juvenile \noffenders who are below the age of 18 whilst ensuring the safeguard of their rights. \nThere are two centres for the RYC, as the hon. Member probably knows, one for boys \nand one for girls. Both centres are located at Barkly, Beau Bassin, and they can accommodate \nsome 44 residents.  \nHowever, following the proclamation of the Children’s Act 2020 in January 2022 and \nits subsequent implementation, there have been only four admissions at the RYC, for the \nfollowing reasons – \na) \nChildren under the age of 14 years are no longer prosecuted; \nb) \nChildren with serious behavioural concerns are sent to the Probation Home or \nHostel;  \nc) \nThe law provides for the DPP to advise that the child offender be enrolled on a \ndiversion programme. \nMadam Speaker, over the last years, the number of inmates at the RYC has reduced \nconsiderably and currently, there is no inmate as the last one was transferred to Beau Bassin \nPrison on 30 January of this year because he had reached the age of 18. \nThere are 43 staffs at the RYC, headed by an Acting Superintendent who is responsible \nfor the management and day-to-day operations, and reports to the Commissioner of Prisons. \nThe Superintendent RYC is supported by officers in the grade of Chief Officers, Principal \nOfficers, Senior Officers, and other officers. Since there are no inmates, the staffs have \nbecome redundant. \nFollowing consultations held in February and May 2024 with the staff union and \nrepresentatives of the Government Services Employees Association (GSEA), the possibility \nof redeploying the staff to the Correctional Youth Centres or the Ministry of Gender Equality \nand Family Welfare to provide support in Child Development Unit shelters was discussed. \nThat was in February and May 2024. However, the representatives of Unions did not agree to \nthese proposals. They, instead, came up with a counterproposal that they should be seconded \nto the Ministry of Education and Human Resource, and also to perform the duties at the level \nof Discipline Master. However, when the latter Ministry was consulted at that time, the \nproposal was not agreed upon.  Similarly, no greenlight has been given so far by the Ministry \nof Gender Equality and Family Welfare.   \n\n31 \n \nMadam Speaker, in view of the need to redeploy – because we need to redeploy them – \nthe redundant staff of the RYC, the representatives of my Office met the representatives of \nthe GSEA and representatives of staff on 31 January 2025.  It has been agreed that some RYC \nstaffs would be temporarily posted to the Probation Home for Girls and Probation Hostel for \nBoys and some would be redeployed to the Correctional Youth Centres (CYC). The Acting \nSuperintendent of the RYC and other senior staff would, for the time being, remain posted at \nthe RYC for administration purposes and to monitor and organise the other schedules of \nwork. The RYC officers would continue to report to the Acting Superintendent, RYC and \nretain all their benefits and allowances, and would continue to perform as per their schemes \nof service. However, all of them, in time, will have to be redeployed.  \nNecessary training will be imparted to enable them to integrate the Probation \nInstitutions and the Correctional Youth Centres. At the Prisons Department, they will be \nproviding assistance to the Officers of the Prisons Cadre, including those of the Welfare Unit \ngiven their counselling skills. \n \nMadam Speaker, the RYC will remain operational in case an inmate is referred by \nCourt, which might happen. The Acting Superintendent will then ensure that the necessary \nstaff will be available to provide all the necessary training, counselling, and support. \n \nAs regards the future strategy of the RYC, consultations will be held with relevant \nstakeholders for appropriate legislative amendments. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMrs Savabaddy: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Thank you, hon. Prime Minister, for \nyour answer. May I kindly draw your attention to the fact that, since, as you said, 30 January, \nthere have been no inmates in RYC and that the staff posted there have been transferred to \nCYC, there is a mismatch since one scheme of duties is under the PSC and the other falls \nunder the DFSC. Can this be addressed, please? \nThe Prime Minister: This is being addressed, Madam Speaker. Let me assure the \nhon. Member. In fact, this has happened in the past, and this will be addressed. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMrs Savabaddy: Thank you. Will the hon. Prime Minister agree that the whole \nconcept of Rehabilitation Youth Centre or Correctional Youth Centre needs a complete \n\n32 \n \nrevamping to fulfil its mission to address juvenile delinquency and that there is a need for an \nassessment of the situation to see the heart of the problem? Thank you. \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, we will be doing that. In fact, as I said, the RYC has become \nredundant, but we will look at it globally. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. First Member for Rodrigues, Ms Collet! \nREHABILITATION YOUTH CENTRES – OPERATIONALISATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/75",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 75,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/75) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime Minister, \nMinister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Rehabilitation Youth Centres \n(RYCs), he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number thereof \noperating across mainland Mauritius and Rodrigues, indicating the number of \n– \n(i) \nofficers posted at each Centre, and \n(ii) \nyouth admitted in each Centre over the past  \n3 years, and \n(b) \nstate if he has been made aware of difficulties faced for the admission of youth \nin RYC in Rodrigues over the past 3 years, indicating the assistance being \nenvisaged for the operationalisation thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ntabling the information requested by the hon. Member. It is a long answer.  \nRegarding part (b) of the question, Prisons and Reform Institutions in Rodrigues fall \nunder the responsibility of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly, as outlined in the Rodrigues \nRegional Assembly Act. So, the question should be addressed to the Assembly. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. Hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES – SUSPENDED DRIVING LICENCES – REHABILITATION \nCOURSE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-04-march-2025",
        "tuesday-22-july-2025",
        "tuesday-07-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/76",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 76,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/76) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to driving licenses \n\n33 \n \nsuspended during the last 5 years in Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Commissioner of Police, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of persons concerned therewith, and \n(b) \nnumber of drivers requiring enrolment for the mandatory Rehabilitation course, \nindicating the frequency the course is being dispensed in Rodrigues and where.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, Section 53 (1) (a) of the Road Traffic Act \n(RTA) stipulates that where a person who is the holder of a driving licence or a provisional \ndriving licence in the Republic of Mauritius is disqualified by virtue of a conviction or order \nunder Part IV of the Act, the licence shall be retained by the Licensing Officer as long as the \ndisqualification is in force, and the licence shall be suspended as from the date of \ndisqualification until the restoration of the licence to its holder. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I have been informed by the Commissioner of \nPolice that since January 2020 to 27 February 2025, there has been a total of 915 licence \nholders who have been disqualified in Rodrigues. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed that since January 2020 to December \n2024, 322 drivers have enrolled for the mandatory Rehabilitation Course, out of which 218 \nlicences were reinstated. The course is currently conducted at the MITD of Rodrigues, Le \nChou Training Centre, and is held every three months. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet! \n \nSTATE OF THE ECONOMY REPORT – DATA MANIPULATION – REMEDIAL \nACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/77",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 77,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/77) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to cases of alleged \nfalsification of data/statistics as highlighted in the State of the Economy Report, he will state \nthe – \n(a) \nactions, if any, taken to identify those who have compiled or given \ndirections/instructions to compile misrepresented data, and \n(b) \nmeasures Government proposes to take to avoid the recurrence thereof. \n\n34",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Indeed, Madam Speaker, as highlighted in the State of the \nEconomy Report, there was a deliberate manipulation of data under the previous government \nto convey a false sense of a booming economy. It was an illusion, a mirage. \nGDP at market prices was overstated by around Rs22 billion for 2023, and more than \nRs36 billion for 2024.  \nThe budget deficit was understated in the Budget document by 1.8 per cent of GDP for \nfiscal year 2023-2024 and by 3.3 per cent of GDP for fiscal year 2024-2025. \nWe have amply demonstrated that the falsification of data was the only way for the \nprevious government to conceal its economic and fiscal mismanagement, and the resulting \ndisastrous situation. But the truth has finally come out. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, the real culprits and the \nmasterminds behind the falsification of data have already been booted out of office. Game-\nover for them!  But we are looking very closely to take further appropriate actions if needed. \nMadam Speaker, we are rebuilding our institutions to ensure that their independence, \ntheir good governance and effective functioning is a reality. One example is the Bank of \nMauritius which has regained total independence to carry out its functions and its roles.  \nWe will also carry out a fundamental review of the governance structure across key \npublic sector institutions, including the Economic Development Board and Statistics \nMauritius. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, Government has already secured technical \nassistance from the IMF to review and strengthen our institutions and statistical system so as \nto prevent the recurrence of this terrible manipulation that has taken place.  \nThe IMF will carry out a comprehensive assessment of the extent to which our \ninstitutions, including the Ministry of Finance, Statistics Mauritius, and the Bank of \nMauritius, are observing international statistical standards and codes while compiling and \ndisseminating statistics. \nThe assessment will cover all statistical sectors, namely the national accounts, price \nindices, monetary and fiscal statistics, government finance statistics and the balance of \npayments.  \n\n35 \n \nAt the end of the assessment, the IMF will submit a Report on the Observance of \nStandards and Codes (ROSC) together with appropriate recommendations.  This assessment \nby the IMF is long overdue since the last one was carried out in 2002. \nMadam Speaker, the IMF has, as a matter of priority, agreed to devote the first part of \nthe exercise to reviewing the organisational structure of Statistics Mauritius, and its data \ncollection and dissemination process to prevent, again, such interferences in the future.   \nWe are acting fast to restore the integrity and quality of our statistics after ten years of \nabuse.  A Steering Committee is being set up under the Ministry of Finance to coordinate the \nassessment of the IMF and ensure effective implementation of its recommendations. \nMadam Speaker, we will shortly reconstitute the Statistics Board and appoint an \nindependent and fully qualified Chairperson, and that Board will be given full independence \nin the exercise of its responsibilities.  \nWith the implementation of the recommendations of the IMF, we will ensure that in \nfuture, no government will be able to manipulate data ever again. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, could the hon. Prime Minister advise if his \nadministration has received any representation, in whatever form, from the then \nrepresentatives of the MSM Government to defend the figures they have presented to the \nMauritians? \nThe Prime Minister: I do not think they are able to do that. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, are we to understand that… \nMadam Speaker: Brief! Brief, because time is almost up. \nMr A. Duval: …the Director of Statistics, who by law has to be independent, does not \ntake instruction from anyone? That, under the Statistics Act, there is no disciplinary action \nbeing envisaged, let alone taken against him and others under him for having wilfully \nfalsified data, according to what is being said? Is this what the hon. Prime Minister is saying; \nthat there is no action being envisaged, let alone being taken? \nThe Prime Minister: No, no! That is not what I said. I did not delve into it too much, \nbut there will be action taken. \nMr A. Duval: It should be immediate... \n\n36 \n \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Eta al dormi do ta! Al happy hour do! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nMr A. Duval: How can we trust these figures? \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, we have got only one minute left!  \nAn hon. Member:  You chose those people! \nMadam Speaker: Chut !  \n(Interruptions) \nMr Quirin! \nMr Quirin: B/78, please! \n(Interruptions) \n᠎The Deputy Prime Minister: Be ou pe assiz koste ar li foutou! \nMr A. Duval: The same people there! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Get dan so pos! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Mohamed: Take a seat back. \nMadam Speaker: B/78 has been called, please! Last question! \n᠎\nLATE MR S. K. – DEATH INQUIRY – STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/78",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 78,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/78) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \ninquiry carried out into the death of late Mr S. K. in or about October 2020, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to where \nmatters stand.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that since 18 \nOctober 2020, date on which the case was reported to the Moka Police Station and transferred \nto the Central Criminal Investigation Department (CCID), 98 persons were interviewed by \n\n37 \n \nthe Police. I must say, if we look back, very few were interviewed at the beginning. When \nthere was a hue and cry, we have seen more and more people going to the Central CID. So, \n98 persons were interviewed, including the former Minister of Commerce and Consumer \nProtection, Mr Yogida Sawmynaden.  \nThereafter, a Judicial Enquiry was instituted by the Magistrate of the District Court of \nMoka to further investigate into the matter and a report was submitted to the Office of the \nDirector of Public Prosecutions (DPP) on 22 November 2021. \nThe report, according to extracts, was a damning indictment of the way the enquiry was \nconducted by the Police and the departments under its responsibility. It was highly critical of \nthe Police’s “new level of incompetence’’ – never such a level had been reached – and “for \ntrying to bury hard facts under layers of official lies’’. \nThe Magistrate in her report was also highly critical of the Police Medical Officer, a \ncertain Dr. Ananda Sunassee. She referred to a scheme mounted around a concocted post \nmortem examination that concluded the cause of death was a suicide when it was clearly later \nfound to be a homicide. \nThe Office of the DPP advised the Police to carry an in-depth investigation anew, with \nutmost diligence and professionalism with a view to exploring avenues as to the possible \nmotives behind the unlawful killing of late S.K. I should say at that time, Madam Speaker, \nthe DPP was requesting this. Do not forget what was happening to the DPP at that time! They \nwere ignoring what the DPP was saying – completely – as if he never existed.  \nHaving said that, since the said alleged murder was reported, we, on this side of the \nHouse, have been vehemently protesting against the way the investigations were being \ncarried out under the direction of the previous Commissioner of Police. After four years now, \nit is clear that there was no willingness on the part of the previous Government to elucidate \nsuch an atrocious crime even though it was an agent of the former Prime Minister.  On the \ncontrary, they did a cover-up. They said it was a case of suicide. The former Prime Minister \neven said: ‘I have done my own enquiry; it is suicide’. The citizens of this country, especially \nthe affected family are still waiting for justice to be done.  \nI have said it before, Madam Speaker, and I am saying it again today, as Prime Minister, \nI wish to reiterate that I am not at all satisfied with the way the investigations had been \ncarried out in this case.  \n\n38 \n \nThis case is of utmost priority to the Police and the new Commissioner of Police has set \nup a dedicated team at the Central CID to conduct an in-depth inquiry with clear-cut \ninstructions to review all the recorded statements, which are being done now, and reports and \nseeking fresh and compelling evidence to identify the perpetrator(s). \nMadam Speaker, I have been further informed by the Commissioner of Police that a \nretired Police Officer with extensive expertise in criminal investigation has been appointed as \nadvisor to the Central CID to look into the whole investigation again. With an extensive \nbackground in criminal investigations, he will play a crucial role at the Central CID and assist \nthe department by leveraging his vast experience to elucidate this case.   \nMadam Speaker, I have said it publicly; we will be enlisting the services of enquiry \nofficers from abroad. We think it is essential. We have done this before; I have done this \nbefore. I have already initiated actions to enlist the services of foreign investigating bodies to \nassist the Police Force in its investigations so that we are ensured that light is shed on this \ncase as well as other – there are other – unresolved cases of false claiming to be suicide, \njumping from cliffs or whatever. All this will be investigated into. \nMadam Speaker: Time is up for PMQT!  \nThe Table has been advised that B/81 and B/83 have been withdrawn.  \nWe can proceed. I call on hon. Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien, Mr \nLukeeram! \nPRIMARY & SECONDARY SCHOOLS – DRUGS REPORTED CASES – 2015-2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/79",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 79,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands – \n \nWhether, in regard to Maha Shivaratree 2025, he will (a) for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of \nPolice, information as to the number of reported cases of \nallegedly oversized Kanwars booked for not being in \nconformity with the provisions of the Road Traffic (Control \nof Structures and Objects During Procession) Regulations \n2025, indicating (i) their place of origin and (ii) the actions \ntaken \nby \nthe \nauthorities \nthereon \nand  \n(b) state the measures being envisaged to ensure \ncompliance with the norms regarding the size of Kanwars \nand other security rules in the future?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": "NOT ANSWERED",
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-18-march-2025",
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/80",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 80,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/80) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses &Triolet) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mauritian \ncitizenship, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number of Non-\nMauritian Citizens who have been granted Mauritian citizenship at the Prime Minister’s \ndiscretion for the period January 2015 to November 2024.",
      "answer": "Reply: By virtue of the Mauritius Citizenship Act, the Prime Minister may grant \nMauritian citizenship to a non-citizen subject to specified conditions under the different \nsections of the Act.  \nNotwithstanding the specified conditions in the Act, sections 5(3) and 9(5) give the \nPrime Minister the power to use his discretion to grant Mauritian citizenship to a non-citizen, \nif he is satisfied that it is in the public interest.  \nFrom January 2015 to November 2024, 4,225 non-citizens were granted Mauritian \ncitizenship, out of which 107 were granted at the discretion of the then Prime Minister. \n \n\n157 \n \nSSR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – NEW AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER – \nCONSTRUCTION DETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/81",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 81,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/81) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nconstruction of a New Air Traffic Control Tower at the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam \nInternational Airport, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Civil Aviation \nDepartment, information as to the – \n(a)  list of contractors shortlisted for the project;  \n(b)  current status of the project, indicating the amount of fund disbursed so far, and  \n(c)  expected completion date thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPHONE TAPPING – INSTALLED EQUIPMENT & SOFTWARE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/82",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 82,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/82) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to phone tapping, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nwhether the equipment previously installed therefor enabled the interception and recording of \nvoice conversations on WhatsApp, Signal, Wickr and Telegram and, if so, indicate the name \nof the equipment and software used as well as the date of entry into service thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: With regard to the replies to PQs B/6 and B/15 of Tuesday 04 February 2025 \nwhereby I informed the House that the previous government had put in place a Machiavellian \nsystem of mass surveillance by monitoring and intercepting calls as well as internet traffic. \nAs I had already stated, no one was spared. The system put in place was a highly \nsophisticated mass monitoring tool for state surveillance. What does this mean? This means \nthat every landline calls as well as mobile conversations using WhatsApp, Signal, Wickr and \nTelegram, you just name it, was monitored by the MSM government.  \nAs I had highlighted, every piece of digital data communicated by the citizens of \nMauritius including members of the defunct L’Alliance Lepep was being diverted to those \ngovernment systems for storage and subsequent exploitation by the rogue Government and in \nparticular the then Prime Minister, who was also the hon. Member’s leader.  \n\n158 \n \nI also stated in this House that the equipment procured and installed by different \ncompanies were being maintained and millions of dollars were spent at the expense of \ntaxpayers’ money.  \nThe hon. Member is asking for the name of the equipment and software used and their \ndate of entry of service. I wish to now reveal to the population of yet another shocking piece \nof information which no one knows except me, the Deputy Prime Minister, and the \nCommissioner of Police. \nAll files and documents related to that equipment have disappeared and cannot be \nretraced. The matter has been reported to the Police, who have already initiated an \ninvestigation in this high-profile case. \nFortunately, the experts who were called to carry out a thorough investigation on the \nsystem put in place have been able to catalogue, shutdown and disconnect all these \nequipment. At this stage, it would not be appropriate to give further information as this would \ncause prejudice to the ongoing enquiry. \n \nMAURITIUS PRISON SERVICE – PRISON POPULATION RISE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/83",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 83,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/83) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the constant rise in \nthe prison population, he will – \n(a)  for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Prison Service, \ninformation as to the – \n(i)  \nname of the actual Commissioner of Prisons;  \n(ii)  official capacity of the prison system, and  \n(iii) actual total prison population including pre-trial and remand detainees, and  \n(b)  state if he has been made aware of recent incidents occurring in the prisons due to \nthe overpopulation thereof and lack of staff, indicating the measures being taken \nto alleviate this problem.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n\n159 \n \nMAURITIUS FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION – ELECTIVE GENERAL ASSEMBLY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/84",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 84,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/84) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to drugs in primary \nand secondary schools, he will state the number of reported cases thereof between 2015 to \n2024, indicating the preventive measures being envisaged.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Third Member for Mahebourg and \nPlaine Magnien for this parliamentary question, which will allow me to delve, albeit briefly, \ninto the prevalence of drugs in our schools. \nToday, unfortunately, even our schools have not been spared from the insidious \ntentacles of drug traffickers. These ruthless criminals are even mercilessly exploiting our \nschoolchildren and are using school premises to expand their business. \n\n39 \n \nDrug-related cases are categorised as criminal cases and are reported to the Police as \nper the protocol established in schools. I am informed that between 2015 and 2024, the \nnumber of cases reported to my Ministry in regard to drug-related incidents is as follows – \n• \n1 in primary school, \n• \n71 in secondary schools. \nMadam Speaker, these figures are not taken lightly by my Ministry. The fight against \nthe scourge of drug abuse in schools holds a prominent place in my Ministry’s agenda. That is \nwhy on 30 January 2025, I chaired a high level multisectoral meeting with several \nstakeholders to address issues related to substance abuse as well as growing indiscipline in \nschools. \nThe meeting comprised representatives of the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family \nWelfare, Ministry of Health and Wellness, the Police Force, ADSU, SEDEC, Managers of \nPrivate Secondary Schools, officers of the Rehabilitation Youth Centre, among others. The \ndiscussions revolved around the effective strategies to combat the proliferation of drugs \nwithin and around school premises. \nMadam Speaker, I would like to inform the House about the preventive measures \ncurrently in place to combat drug abuse in our schools – \n(a) \nRegular awareness talks are organised in schools to sensitise students and staff \nagainst the risks associated with drugs, especially synthetic drugs. \n(b) \nThere are two drug prevention and education programmes known as – \ni. Rebound, \nii. Get Connected Programmes. \nThese two programmes are run with the collaboration of the United Nations \nOffice on Drug and Crime to deter the students from surrendering to the \ntemptation of substance abuse. \n(c) \nThe National Education Counselling Service provides support to vulnerable \nstudents and their families so that they navigate the complex issue of substance \nabuse.  \n\n40 \n \nApart from these preventive measures, Madam Speaker, my Ministry is fully \ncommitted to walk the talk. That is why we have solicited the support of other stakeholders to \nfurther enhance preventive measures. In concrete terms, we have initiated the following – \n(i) \nTargeted crackdown operations with the help of the Police department, \nparticularly ADSU and Brigade pour la protection de la famille. \n(ii) \nEnhanced surveillance at school level by the school personnel, whom I would like \nto salute for the good job they are doing, and intelligence  \nled policing and community involvement by organising sensitisation campaigns \nand increasing Police patrol in high-risk areas. \n(iii) We are also committed to reviewing and tightening relevant legislation to deter \nstudents from engaging in criminal activities, including drug use and trafficking \nboth within and outside school premises. \n(iv) I hereby solicit the collaboration of NGOs specialised in drug prevention, the \nsupport of student councils, the school prefects and PTAs in our quest to prevent \nsubstance abuse. I make an appeal to our grandparents to promote human and \nmoral values in order to enhance ethical behaviour and standards among our \nchildren. \n᠎Madam Speaker, very often, students do not have the necessary skills to deal with those \nwho influence them to take drugs. They do not know what to do and how to resist temptation. \nThat is why it is imperative to engage our students in meaningful dialogues and programmes \nwhich deal principally with prevention. The battle against drugs cannot be confined to the \nfour walls of school premises only. It is a relentless battle that we must fight together as a \nnation. Every parent, teacher, police officer, citizen, and politician has a key role to play in \nbreaking the stronghold of drug trafficking. We must all be vigilant, proactive and \nunwavering in our commitment to eradicating the scourge of drugs from our schools, our \ncommunity and our nation. \nMadam Speaker, in the Government Programme 2025-2029, on page 28, paragraph 56, \nwe can read the following – \n“The fight against drug trafficking and use will be one of the major priorities of \nGovernment. (…) \n\n41 \n \nGovernment will adopt bold measures to end the suffering of families and society in \ngeneral, as a result of the significant increases in drug trafficking over the [past ten \nyears] and the breakdown in law and order.” \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister! Yes, hon. First Member for La Caverne and \nPhoenix! \nMUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF VACOAS-PHOENIX – PLASTIC BINS – \nPROCUREMENT & DISTRIBUTION 2023-2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/85",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 85,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/85) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the contracts for the procurement, \npurchase and supply of plastic bins awarded in 2023 and 2024 by the Municipal Council of \nVacoas Phoenix, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to the \n– \n(a) \nname of the supplier/s thereof, and  \n(b) \nnumber of bins procured, indicating the – \n(i) \namount of fund paid as at date;  \n(ii) \nnumber thereof distributed to the inhabitants falling under the jurisdiction \nof the Council, and  \n(iii) \nnumber thereof not yet distributed and where they have been stored.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker, I want to make it clear that the previous government acted in bad faith \nwhen managing the procurement of the plastic bins for the Municipal Council of Vacoas-\nPhoenix. Their decisions seemed to be driven by political interest rather than the real needs of \nthe community. \nIn regard to part (a) of the question, the Municipal Council of Vacoas-Phoenix has \nprovided the following details about the supplier and the procurement process – \n\n42 \n \n• \nA national bidding process was launched on 10 February 2023 through the e-\nprocurement portal for the supply of 39,000 plastic bins, each with a capacity of \n70 to 80 litres.  \n• \nThe bidding closed on 31 March 2023 with three bidders: Plastic Industry \nMauritius Limited, Alpha Hygiene Ltd, Young Bros (Plastics). \n• \nThe contract was awarded to Plastic Industry Mauritius Limited after a price \nrevision negotiation.  \n• \nThe contract was finalised on 07 August 2023 for a total cost of Rs20,989,800, \nincluding VAT. \nRegarding part (b), subsection (i) of the question, the full contract amount of \nRs20,989,800 was paid to the contractor. However, it later became clear that the actual \ndemand for plastic bins was much lower than the number ordered. \nRegarding part (b), subsections (ii) and (iii) of the question, as a result, Madam \nSpeaker, only 28,988 bins have been distributed to date, leaving 10,012 bins undistributed \ndue to this miscalculation and mismanagement. These bins are currently stored at various \nlocations – \n• \nPaillote Squash Court – 2,347 bins; \n• \nPalmerston Squash Court – 1,562 bins; \n• \nHermitage Kindergarten – 1,624 bins; \n• \nSt Paul Municipal Complex – 3,679 bins; \n• \nUnoccupied space at Paillote Kindergarten – 800 bins. \nThis situation highlights poor planning by the previous administration, leading to \nunnecessary public expenditure. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \n\n43 \n \nMr Lobine: Madam Speaker, may I ask the hon. Minister whether he is aware that bins \nare also being kept in the office of the mayor of the township of Vacoas-Phoenix? Are you \naware of that? I will request a visit. It is in the office of the Mayor of Vacoas-Phoenix. \nAn hon. Member: Sa osi dan so lakaz… \n(Interruptions) \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I am not aware. \nMadam Speaker: Minister, are you aware? \nMr Woochit: No, I am not aware. \nMadam Speaker: Of course not. Of course, he won’t be aware! How big is that office? \nMr Lobine: I will invite a site visit there. Is the hon. Minister aware that those places \nwhere those bins are being kept are in breach of the law? It is in breach of the Occupational \nSafety and Health Act with regard to those bins that are highly flammable, where people are \npractising sports and being kept in very poor hygienic conditions, with dead rats around. Is \nthe minister aware of this? \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I have made several visits around the island, to the \nmarkets and everything. But now, it is making me want to have a visit over at these sites \nmore. \nMadam Speaker: Now, you are dealing with bins! \nMr Woochit: Yes. \nMadam Speaker: Very important for women…  \nMr Woochit: Yes, this is what I said. Now, it is urged for me to go and have a site visit \nover there.  \nMadam Speaker: Now that you know, you will do the needful. I am sure. Mr Lobine! \nMr Lobine: One last? \nMadam Speaker: One very last! \n\n44 \n \nMr Lobine: Will the hon. Minister also engage in an internal enquiry to find out with \nregard to those buildings that do not have fire certificates… \nMadam Speaker: That is another question! \nMr Lobine: …whether these have been in order with regard to placing those bins there \nby the Welfare Department of the Municipal Council of Vacoas-Phoenix? \nMadam Speaker: You will do the needful! \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I will do the needful; this is true. It is only after the site \nvisits that we can take actions.  \nMadam Speaker: I know a lot about bins, myself! Okay. Hon. Third Member for Port \nLouis North and Montagne Longue, Mr Caserne! \nPUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTIONS – CONSULTATION ROOMS – PATIENTS’ \nPRIVACY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/86",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 86,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/86) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to public health \ninstitutions, he will state the measures being taken to ensure the privacy of patient while \nbeing attended by doctors in the different outpatient departments including the casualty and \nunsorted one.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that the following measures \nare in place at the level of public health institutions to ensure the privacy of patients while \nbeing attended by doctors in the different outpatient departments, including the casualty and \nthe unsorted ones – \n(i) \nOne patient is seen at a time by the treating doctor; \n(ii) \nThe patient is consulted in all privacy of a consultation room by the doctor at \nhealth care service points; \n(iii) \nThe couch in each consultation room is shielded by a curtain to create privacy; \n\n45 \n \n(iv) \nConsultation rooms which are fitted with two consultation couches due to lack \nof space are properly shielded from one another by a curtain of portable screen, \nand \n(v) \nMale doctors are assisted by a female nursing officer when examining a female \npatient to ensure patient’s comfort, safety and adherence to professional \nstandards. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: Can I ask the hon. Minister – he is very much aware; there have been two \nrecent cases where healthcare personnel have been brutally attacked in the hospital – if he \nwill issue strict guidelines so that there is a fine line between privacy and security of \nhealthcare personnel? Thank you. \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I am aware of the incident which occurred, and that is \nwhy during my speech today, I will lengthily speak on that issue, and we will be without any \npity against those who have committed such blunders in the hospitals. Secondly, I take note \nof what you have told me. I will look into it. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister! Yes, hon. Third Member for Rodrigues, Mrs \nHenriette-Manan! \nRODRIGUES, PLAINE MAPOU – NEW MODERN HOSPITAL",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/87",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 87,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/87) Mrs D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the \nMinister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the increasing number of patients \ntravelling from Rodrigues to Mauritius for medical treatment and the high costs associated \nthereto, he will state the support being extended to the Rodrigues Regional Assembly for the \nestablishment of a modern hospital in Rodrigues, indicating the steps being taken to ensure \nthat essential healthcare services are accessible on the island.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Acting Health Director of \nRodrigues that the establishment of a new modern hospital at Plaine Mapou, near Plaine \nCorail Airport, has been envisaged by the Rodrigues Regional Assembly. This initiative aims \nto enhance access to upgraded healthcare services, addressing the growing demand from both \n\n46 \n \nthe local population, who seek higher quality care on the island, and the very expanding \ntourism sector. \nMadam Speaker, in the same breath, the World Health Organization has been consulted \nto provide technical support for the project. To date, a conclusive assessment as well as a pre-\nfeasibility study have been completed. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that the Commission will, in the first instance, \nconduct a full feasibility study. This study will be crucial in determining the detailed \nrequirements, cost implications and timeline necessary for the successful establishment of the \nhospital. The Government remains committed to ensuring that healthcare services in \nRodrigues are accessible, efficient and aligned to the growing demands. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMrs Henriette-Manan: Madam Speaker, I would also like to ask the hon. Minister \nwhether he is aware of the acute lack of staff in the Rodrigues Health System and if his \nMinistry plans to help in the recruitment of new staff in the meantime until the establishment \nof this new hospital. Thank you. \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, we have taken note of her request. Even a few weeks \nago, a request was made to my ministry, and I am trying to make arrangements so that there \nwill not be any difficulty as far as the patients are concerned. And we are increasing the \nnumber of specialist doctors who are also visiting for Rodrigues. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. François, yes! \nMr François: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister whether he is \naware that there is a comprehensive report by the Hospital Services Consultancy Corporation \nLimited of India that proposes a state-of-the-art landmark hospital for Rodrigues through a \nredevelopment master plan for the existing Queen Elizabeth Hospital with salient features \nsuch as ensuring seamless transition and no hindrance in the current functioning of a hospital \nwith modern infrastructure, more space for additional services, expanding bed capacity from \n194 to 442 and planning along with all the latest equipment? \nMadam Speaker: This is almost a statement! Are you aware? Will you talk about it \nlater? \n\n47 \n \nMr Bachoo: I am aware of the report. We are working on that but it all depends on the \navailability of funds. \nMadam Speaker: Of course! Okay, the hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES – ELECTRICITY SUPPLY – PRODUCTION CAPACITY & \nPOWER OUTAGE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/88",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 88,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/88) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nEnergy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to electricity supply in Rodrigues, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Electricity Board, information as to the – \n(a)  production capacity of the Rodrigues plant, indicating the peak power demand, \nand  \n(b)  reasons for the frequent power outage, indicating the remedial measures being \ntaken in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, je voudrai avec votre permission répondre aux \nquestions B/88 et B/89 en même temps. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nMr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, je suis informé que le Central Electricity \nBoard dispose d’une capacité de production effective totale de 13,7 MW à l’île Rodrigues, \ncomprenant deux centrales thermiques d’une capacité effective de 11,4 MW, deux parcs \néoliens de 1,22 MW et un parc solaire photovoltaïque de 1 MW. \nLa prévision globale de l’offre et de la demande d’électricité pour l’île Rodrigues pour \n2025 est de 9,19 MW. \nJe suis également informé qu’à 19 heures le 3 février 2025, une demande maximale \nhistorique de 8,97 MW a été enregistrée sur l’île Rodrigues. Le CEB a pu répondre à la \ndemande grâce à ses unités de production. \nMadame la présidente, en ce qui concerne les coupures de courant rencontrées sur l’île, \nil convient de noter qu’il existe deux types de coupures de courant, à savoir les coupures \nplanifiées et les coupures imprévues. Les coupures planifiées permettent aux personnels du \nCEB d’effectuer des travaux de maintenance. Les coupures imprévues, par contre, en \nrevanche sont imprévues bien sûr et leur durée dépend de la nature du défaut. \n\n48 \n \nLe CEB m’a informé qu’un total de 178 pannes a été enregistré sur l’île au cours des 12 \nderniers mois, dont plus de 80 % étaient dues à des défauts inévitables de nature transitoire \nqui ont été résolus en quelques minutes. Les autres coupures de courant plus longues à \nRodrigues étaient principalement dues à des pannes générales du réseau à trois reprises en \n2024 et à deux reprises en février 2025. \nLa première panne du 16 février 2025 est survenue suite à un déclenchement de \nl’alimentateur d’Oyster Bay à Rodrigues en raison d’un poteau tombé, et la panne du 22 \nfévrier 2025 est survenue suite au déclenchement de l’alimentateur de Malartic en raison d’un \nbras transversal brisé d’un poteau. Dans les deux cas, la protection du générateur s’est \ndéclenchée, entraînant le déclenchement en cascade de tous les groupes électrogènes, \nprovoquant ainsi une panne générale, un blackout. Au fait, le 22 février 2025 à 13 h 15, un \ndéfaut de surintensité a provoqué le déclenchement de l’alimentation de Malartic. Lors du \nrétablissement de l’alimentation de Malartic à 13 h 22, 7 minutes après, l’alimentation a été \nfermée, mais le défaut n’a pas été éliminé. Cela a provoqué le déclenchement des groupes \nélectrogènes à Port Mathurin et à Pointe Monnier et a ainsi conduit à une situation de panne \ngénérale encore une fois – blackout général. \nMadame la présidente, en raison des problèmes fréquents sur le réseau électrique à \nRodrigues, j’ai demandé à une équipe du CEB de se rendre d’urgence à Rodrigues pour faire \nle point de la situation, examiner les raisons des perturbations fréquentes et faire des \nrecommandations pour une action rapide. Une équipe composée d’un membre du conseil \nd’administration, du directeur par intérim de la distribution et d’un technicien de l’unité \nproduction thermique. Ils étaient à Rodrigues la semaine dernière, du 24 au 25 février 2025. \nIls ont soumis leur rapport, qui est actuellement à l’étude par le board du CEB. J’ai les six \npoints soulevés dans le rapport. \nMadame la présidente, je tiens à souligner que, comme c’est le cas à Maurice, peu ou \npas de planification a été faite pour répondre à la demande croissante d’électricité à \nRodrigues. Le CEB a été chargé de travailler sur un nouveau plan énergétique qui garantira la \nsécurité énergétique d’abord ainsi que la transition vers l’énergie verte sur toute la \nRépublique. \nMadame la présidente, pour répondre à la question en ce qui concerne la partie (b) du \nPQ B/89, je suis informé que les travaux d’enfouissement du réseau de câbles de 22 KW de \nPort Mathurin à l’aéroport de Pointe Corail via l’hôpital La Ferme ont été initiés par le CEB \n\n49 \n \nen 2019 à la demande de l’Assemblée Régionale de Rodrigues. Le projet doit être réalisé en \nquatre phases sur la base de partage des coûts. Je suis informé que la phase 1 du projet de la \ncentrale électrique de Port Mathurin à l’usine de dessalement de English Bay est terminée. Le \nCEB est en contact avec la RRA pour obtenir l’accord de cette dernière pour achever le projet.  \nConcernant la partie (c) du PQ B/89, je suis informé que les six unités de la centrale \nthermique de Port Mathurin d’une capacité effective de 400 KW chacune fonctionnent depuis \n34 ans en moyenne et que leur maintenance est devenue extrêmement difficile et coûteuse. \nElles ne sont exploitées qu’en cas d’urgence lors des pics de production et, malheureusement, \ntrès souvent ces temps-ci. \nAfin de relever ces défis et d’assurer la sécurité énergétique de Rodrigues d’abord, le \nCEB réfléchit actuellement – je dis bien – réfléchit actuellement à l’utilité d’un nouveau \nmoteur thermique de 2,5 MW à la centrale électrique de Pointe Monnier tout en retirant \nsystématiquement les moteurs obsolètes. Ces moteurs pourront être convertis à l’avenir pour \nfonctionner avec des sources d’énergie plus propres à un stade ultérieur dans le cadre de la \ndécarbonisation du réseau électrique à Rodrigues. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, time is up for the moment, but you will be able both of you to \nput your questions after we come back. So, we suspend for one hour and a half. we come \nback at 2.30 p.m. \nAt 1.01 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.33 p.m. with Madam Speaker in Chair.  \nMadam Speaker: We were on the question of Mr Edouard, I think. Yes! \nMr Edouard: Merci, Madame la présidente. Je voudrais demander au ministre s’il y a \nun plan pour la transition vers les énergies renouvelables pour Rodrigues ? \nMr Assirvaden :  Oui, effectivement, Madame la présidente, nous avons un plan. On \ntravaille déjà sur un plan avec la RRA sur la transition énergétique. Mais, comme je l’ai dit \ndans ma réponse initiale, c’est que d’abord et avant tout, nous allons insister sur la sécurité \nénergétique. La sécurité énergétique veut dire qu’il faudra s’assurer que les Rodriguais et les \nRodriguaises, en général, soient pourvus d’électricité au moment voulu. Mais, au même \nmoment de la transition énergétique, la sécurité énergétique y va de pair.  \nMadam Speaker : Merci, M. le ministre ! Honorable François ! \n\n50 \n \nMr François: Just one supplementary, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister \nwhether he is aware if CEB Rodrigues is contemplating recruiting additional human \nresources for an efficient and effective service thereat? \nMr Assirvaden: Le nécessaire sera fait. Je veux dire que nous regardons d’une façon \nholistique, une approche générale. C’est pour cette raison que j’ai demandé à une équipe de \nMaurice avec plus d’expérience d’aller à l’île Rodrigues pour voir en général ce qui peut être \nfait. Rassurez-vous, messieurs et mesdames de l’Assemblée nationale, que le nécessaire sera \nfait pour assurer cette sécurité énergétique.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much. \nRODRIGUES – ELECTRICITY SUPPLY – DISRUPTIONS, UNDERGROUND \nCABLE NETWORK & SUSTAINABLE POWER DEVELOPMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/89",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 89,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/89) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nEnergy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to electricity supply in Rodrigues, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Electricity Board, information as to – \n(a) \nthe number of power disruptions registered during the last 12 months, indicating \nthe overall electricity demand-supply in the island; \n(b) \nwhere matters stand as to the works to be undertaken for the – \n (i)  underground cable network from Port Mathurin to Plaine Corail Airport via \nLa Ferme Hospital, and  \n(ii)  retirement and replacement of the 6 MWN Engines at Port Mathurin, and  \n(c) \nfuture sustainable power generation development in Rodrigues, if any.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/88) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues, your next question! \nMV TROCHETIA – DRYDOCKING COSTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/90",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 90,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/90) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to the MV \nTrochetia, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Shipping \nCorporation Ltd., information as to the – \n\n51 \n \n(a) \nrepairs/drydocking carried out in Sri Lanka in 2024 and the costs incurred \ntherefor;  \n(b)  damages sustained by the vessel in Agalega in February 2025, and  \n(c)  current seaworthiness condition of the vessel, indicating the impact thereof on sea \nroute to Rodrigues.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much. Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Mauritius \nShipping Corporation Ltd. that following a bidding exercise carried out, a contract for \ndrydocking of MV Mauritius Trochetia was allocated to Columbus Shipyard Public Co. Ltd. \non 02 October 2024 for a sum of 1,281,178 dollars equivalent to 60 million dollars.  \nAccordingly, the MV Mauritius Trochetia sailed for Columbus Shipyard, Sri Lanka, on \n28 September 2024 and was drydocked on 07 October 2024. The drydocking and repair \nworks of the MV Mauritius Trochetia were completed on 03 December 2024, and it left \nColombo on 10 December 2024 to reach Port Louis on 17 December 2024. \nOn 06 December 2024, the Mauritius Shipping Corporation Ltd has effected payment \nof USD 613,985, representing 50% of the repair cost. We will settle the 40% in March 2025 \nand the remaining 10% in June 2025. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Mauritius Shipping \nCorporation Ltd that during the last trip of Mauritius Trochetia to Agaléga, the vessel \ncollided with a jetty on 02 February 2025 due to inadequate tug assistance, and this has \ncaused underwater hull damage. Moreover, the above-water hull has also sustained damage \ndue to lack of proper fenders on the jetty.  \nMadam Speaker, regarding part (c) of the question, the Shipping Corporation Ltd. \ncontacted Chantier Naval de l'Océan Indien for drydocking of the vessel. On Wednesday 19 \nFebruary 2025, the latter has indicated that no slot is available before December 2025. On the \nsame day, the Mauritius Shipping Corporation Ltd. contacted a company, namely Secren \nlocated in Diego Suarez, Madagascar, for permanent repair of the vessel. \nOn 24 February 2024, Secren confirmed that its drydock would be available as from 27 \nFebruary 2025. Necessary clearances have been sought from Bureau Veritas Classification \nSociety located in France and filed administration for the vessel to sail to Madagascar. \nSubject to favourable reply, permanent repairs will be carried out in Madagascar and are \nexpected to be completed in a month. \n\n52 \n \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that the Mauritius Shipping Corporation Ltd \nwill put the MV Trochetia into commercial operation and to Rodrigues and Agaléga until all \nrepairs are carried out. And I mean full repairs.  \nAs regards voyages to Rodrigues, the hon. Member can rest assured that MV Peros \nBanhos shall continue with its usual free regular voyages per month so as to avoid any \ndisruption in cargo transportation. The Mauritius Shipping Corporation Ltd is currently \nliaising with local shipping companies for chartering a vessel to additionally service \nRodrigues and Agaléga in the event of unpredictable circumstances.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. \nCHILDREN’S ACT 2020 – AMENDMENT – JUVENILE OFFENDERS & ABUSE \nCASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/91",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 91,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/91) Mrs A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the \nrecent increase in cases of abuse in shelters, juvenile delinquency, repeated escapes from \nprobation hostels and indiscipline in schools, she will state if consideration will be given to \namending the Children’s Act 2020 to facilitate the detention of juvenile offenders in such \ncases in Rehabilitation Youth Centres.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/74) \nMadam Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or!  \nFSC – RECRUITMENT & PROMOTION POLICIES (2024)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/92",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 92,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/92) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to recruitments, \npromotions and change of contracts effected at the Financial Services Commission prior to \nthe General Elections in 2024, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommission, information as to the – \n(a)  recruitment and promotion policies thereof; \n(b) \nnames and details of staff, particularly those above the rank of Assistant Manager, \ninitially working on a contractual basis but subsequently appointed on a \npermanent basis in the second half of 2024, and  \n(c) \nname of the current head of the AML/CFT of the Commission, indicating the \nterms and conditions of work of the incumbent. \n\n53",
      "answer": "Dr. Mrs Jeetun: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am advised \nby the Financial Services Commission that recruitment and promotion exercises are carried \nout in accordance with Sections 80 and 81 of the Financial Services Act 2007 and in line with \nthe Recruitment and Promotion Policies of the FSC.  \nPlease bear with me, I will read out those policies. So, the Recruitment and Promotion \nPolicies are laid down in the Terms and Conditions of Employment 2023 of the FSC and \nstipulate the following – \n(i) \nThe Commission may employ on such terms and conditions as it thinks fit such \nemployees as may be necessary for the proper discharge of its functions.  \n(ii) \nWhere the Commissions decides to fill any vacancy arising on its establishment \nfor any post, it may resort to any form of advertisement whether internal or \notherwise and prescribe such qualifications, experience, competences, skills and \naptitudes for such post as it deems fit.   \n(iii) \nRecruitment, appointment and promotion of employees shall be made by the \nboard which may empower the staff committee or delegate to management on \nsuch terms of reference as it considers necessary, including the request to \nexamine, interview and shortlist candidates; \n(iv) \nThere will be equal opportunities for recruitment, employment, learning and \ndevelopment, advancement and promotion to all based on merit.  \n(v) \nWhen vacancies arise the FSC shall give priority to internal candidates first \nbefore searching externally, should a suitable candidate not be found. \nMadam Speaker, as to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the FSC of the \nfollowing – \n(1) \nThe Manager, Human Resources was previously appointed on a contractual \nbasis with effect from 01 April 2022 for a period of two years. Thereafter, the \ncontract was extended twice up to September 2024. Following an internal \nadvert which was launched on 02 May 2024, the incumbent has subsequently \nbeen appointed on probation with effect from 01 September 2024 with a view \nto confirmation on a permanent and pensionable capacity. \n\n54 \n \n(2) \nThe Manager, Communications was initially recruited on a contractual basis \nas PR and Communications Officer for a period of two years with effect from \n11 October 2021.   \nThe contract was extended for a further period of one year. The incumbent has \nthereafter been appointed as Manager, Communications on probation with \neffect from 01 October 2024 with a view to confirmation on a permanent and \npensionable capacity following an internal advert launched in May 2024. \n(3) \nOne Director and three Assistant Directors were serving as permanent \nemployees as Senior Managers and were appointed on a performance contract \non an assignment basis in line with the Review Report conducted by Mr \nAppana in 2016. On 01 September 2024, they were all appointed in \nsubstantive capacity, and \n(4) \nOne Director and two Assistant Directors were initially appointed on a \ncontractual basis in 2018 and 2019. They were offered a new contract for a \nperiod of two years with effect from 01 September 2024 renewable subject to \nsatisfactory performance. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed by the FSC that 51 employees in different \ngrades were recruited during the period January 2024 to November 2024 or up to the \nelections out of whom, 48 are on a permanent basis and three on a contract basis. The Board \nhas been requested to look into these recruitments done during the year prior to the election.  \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (c) of the question, I am informed that the current head \nof the AML/CFT directorate, Mrs Y. S., joined the FSC on 09 January 2013 as Assistant \nManager, formerly known as Chief Examiner, on a permanent and pensionable basis. She was \npromoted to the post of Manager with effect from 01 September 2018 and has been assigned \nthe responsibilities of Acting Senior Manager in the AML/CFT directorate with effect from \n03 October 2022. In addition to her salary, she is being paid an acting allowance and other \nbenefits in line with the FSC terms and condition of employment. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes! \nMr Etwareea: Madame la présidente, tout semble indiquer que certains recrutements et \npromotions ont été faits juste avant les élections et ma question à l’honorable ministre est si \nles résultats de l’enquête en cours seront publiés ? \n\n55 \n \nMadam Speaker: Vous avez entendu ? Moi, j’ai eu du mal.  \nMr Etwareea: Je peux répéter la question. \nDr. Mrs Jeetun: I will see with the Board, but, as you know, there is also data \nprotection concerning employees, and there is a contract of employment between the \nemployer and the employee. So, there is so much that can be disclosed outside of the \ncontract, subject to advice. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: One more and then one behind you. \nMr Etwareea: Par rapport à cette question et aux informations et à la protection des \ndonnées, on dirait qu’il y a une dissimulation de l’information. Est-ce que vous avez contacté \nle Law Office pour ne pas donner ces informations ? \nDr. Mrs Jeetun: The Data Protection Act is quite clear. We cannot disclose; we will be \nin breach of the Data Protection Act if we disclose personal data, and also, the employer has \nan obligation towards their employee not to disclose that information. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Yes! \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, considering the fact that the regulator imposes on \nlicensees to carry out due diligence, the more so to check if the applicants are Politically \nExposed Person (PEP), could the hon. Minister advise, if she is aware, of the recruitments she \njust mentioned, how many of them were PEPs and if the FSC is aware of which political \npeople those employees are attached to? \nDr. Mrs Jeetun: I will make inquiries and give back the information later. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, please. \nMr Juman: Thank you, Madam Speaker, it is clear that the FSC has not… \nMadam Speaker: Please speak up. Is there a problem with the mike? Please speak up, \nall of you! Je n’entends pas! \nMr Juman: Thank you, Madam Speaker, it is clear that the FSC has not adhered to the \nproper recruitment process on the eve of the election. Can you consider requesting the Board \nto cancel these appointments? \nDr. Mrs Jeetun: The Board has been made aware of those 51 recruitments done in the \nyear before the election, and I have asked them – you know, the Board is mandated with the \npowers – to look into this, and I will wait for their outcome. \n\n56 \n \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Third Member for Beau-Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nALBION & ROSE-HILL – BUS ROUTE SERVICE – COMPLAINTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/93",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 93,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/93) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the bus route between Albion and Rose-\nHill, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, \ninformation as to the number of complaints made by the public against the public and private \nbus operators servicing this route, indicating the – \n(a) \nnumber of buses operating thereat, and \n(b) \nscheduled time table for the buses servicing on this route.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the National Land \nTransport Authority that some 22 buses of the United Bus Service Ltd operate along route 45, \nwhich runs between Albion and Rose-Hill. According to the established timetable, these \nbuses operate at a frequency of 10-20 minutes whereby the first bus from Albion and Rose-\nHill leaves at 05:45 in the morning, while the last bus from Albion and Rose-Hill leaves at \n17:40 and 19:00 hrs, respectively. \nAccording to the NLTA, two complaints have been filed at its office as of date \nregarding the lack of buses along route 45. Moreover, the hon. Quirin had drawn my \nattention, and my ministry had looked into the matter previously as well. It is to be \nhighlighted that the NLTA inspectorate has observed that the UBS buses along route 45 are \noperating at intervals of 20-30 minutes instead of 10-20 minutes as set out in the established \ntimetable, hence the hue and cry. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to point out that despite fewer trips being carried out by the \nbuses of the UBS, the latter is being paid the same quantum in respect of the free travel \ncompensation by the NLTA. Given that the same is a monthly fixed amount calculated based \non 80% of the operator’s fleet, this is not normal. I will explain later in the same reply what I \nintend to do in five steps. \nWith regard to the unsatisfactory level of service along route 45, Madam Speaker, a \nmeeting was held on 19 February 2025 at the level of the NLTA with the representatives of \nthe UBS whereby it was imparted that the main course entailing irregular bus service thereat \nwas the lack of drivers. I wish to point out that the issue of shortage of crew has been \nhighlighted by most bus operators, and my ministry has already initiated consultations with \n\n57 \n \nstakeholders, including with the Ministry of Labour and Industrial Relations, with a view to \nexpediting the recruitment of foreign labour in the transport sector while considering the \nstreamlining of procedures thereof. \nMoreover, like I mentioned in this House during previous sittings, the problem of the \npoor level of bus service is occurring along several routes around the island, and I listed \nseveral mitigating measures which included – \n(i) \nThe introduction of a Fleet Management System. I had explained in great \ndetail previously what it is all about, but this will take some time.  \n(ii) \nMeanwhile, the Memorandum of Understanding – this is what I meant earlier \n– relating to the payment of free travel compensation which was signed \nbetween the NLTA and the bus operators in 2005 will be reviewed in the \ninterest of the travelling public subject to a government approval such that \npayment will be a trip-based system rather than a daily-based one.  \nSo, this is what I can do in order to pressurise the bus operators to work harder; \n(iii) \nThe road service licence of operators not providing services as per the \nconditions of their licences will be revoked, and section 77D of the Road \nTraffic Act will be used to have new players; \n(iv) \nThe inspectorate of the NLTA, which is currently devoid of such officers, will \nbe strengthened with Management Support Officers pending a substantive \nrecruitment exercise of inspectors to ensure a higher NLTA presence along bus \nroutes to help out, and \n(v) \nConsultations are ongoing with bus operators to acquire new buses and avail \nof the incentive provided under the bus modernisation programme. \nMeanwhile, Madam Speaker, I have urged the NLTA inspectorate to ensure close \nmonitoring of the operations of the UBS buses along route 45. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister. Yes? \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. L’honorable ministre est parfaitement au \ncourant de la situation et, d’après les informations qui me sont parvenues (et l’honorable \nministre, dans sa réponse, en a fait état), les compagnies qui desservent cette route ne sont pas \nen mesure de respecter les horaires ; ce qui fait que cela cause pas mal de problèmes pour les \nétudiants le matin, pour ceux qui vont au travail aussi. Donc, je peux comprendre que \n\n58 \n \nl’honorable ministre est coincé quelque part, il n’a pas toutes les solutions à ce jour, mais, \ndans l’immédiat, comment faire, Madame la présidente, pour donner satisfaction, pour éviter \nque cette situation continue à dégénérer ? Est-ce que l’honorable ministre pourrait, dans un \npremier temps, nous dire quelles sont les mesures correctives immédiates qui pourraient être \nprises ? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Minister? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes, like I said in my reply, Madam Speaker, as an interim \nmeasure, pending the arrival of the Fleet Management System which will put good order in \nthe House, I am asking the Ministry and the NLTA to review the Memorandum of \nUnderstanding, which is a de facto payment on a daily basis. This is not normal. So, if we \nhave them paid on a trip basis, they will have to work. \nMr Quirin: L’honorable ministre est-il disposé à considérer – et je vais lui partager \ncette proposition des usagers – qui suggèrent que le terminus pour les bus d’Albion-Rose Hill \net de Rose Hill-Albion se fassent à la gare de la Place Margeot au lieu de la place Darès \nSalaam à Rose Hill, cela afin de faciliter – j’espère que l’honorable ministre me comprend – \nla mobilité des personnes du troisième âge et des usagers en général. Et aussi, de considérer \nla possibilité, Madame la présidente, d’une ligne directe Beau Bassin-Albion et vice versa, \ncar les habitants rencontrent trop de problèmes par rapport aux connections. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes, as regards the first part, the change of location in the \ninterest of the senior citizens, I can certainly look into it. As regards the second proposition, \ndepending on the availability of buses I just mentioned, the big challenge is having drivers, \nwhich is a rare competence now, seemingly. So, I will definitely look into it and discuss it \nwith the Member. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. C’est bon? Thank you, now we have the \nhon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle! \n᠎GRAND PORT DISTRICT COUNCIL – FOOTBALL PITCHES – LIGHTING \nFACILITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/94",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 94,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/94) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the football pitches found in \nthe villages of Grand Sable, Bambous Virieux, Bois des Amourettes and Rivière des Créoles, \nhe will state if consideration will be given for the provision of lighting facilities thereat. \n\n59",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the District Council of Grand Port \nthat a budgetary request of Rs16 million was submitted for the Financial Year 2024-2025 to \nprovide lighting facilities for the football pitch in the villages of Grand Sable, Bambous \nVirieux, Bois des Amourettes and Rivière des Créoles. The estimated cost for each football \nground is Rs4 million. However, the necessary funds were not allocated by the previous \nGovernment to implement this project. \nAdditionally, I have been advised that the District Council of Grand Port is currently \nformulating its project proposal for the upcoming financial year. The installation of lighting \nfacilities for these football pitches will duly be considered as part of the budgetary planning \nfor the 2025-26 Financial Year. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, yes? \nMr Seeburn: Madam Speaker, given that we have inherited huge social degradation \nproblems, in particular the rising drug problem in these areas from the previous Government, \nwould the hon. Minister consider implementing the lighting facilities project for these \nfootball pitches and promoting evening sports facilities to combat the drug problem and \nperhaps consider same in the forthcoming budget? \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, it is indeed regrettable that despite a request from the \nDistrict Council of Grand Port for Rs16 million in last year’s budget to provide lighting \nfacilities for these football pitches, the previous government did not consider it a priority and \nfailed to allocate the necessary funds, but this government recognises the importance of \nsports facilities infrastructure for community development and sports engagement. I can \nassure the hon. Member that the District Council of Grand Port is actively working on its \nproject proposal for the 2025-26 financial year, and the installation of lighting facilities on \nthese football pitches will be given serious consideration during the upcoming budgetary \ndiscussion. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, thank you. Your next question! \n᠎DR JAMES BURTY DAVID MARKET FAIR, ROSE BELLE – ADDITIONAL \nPARKING FACILITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/95",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 95,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/95) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Dr James Burty David \nMarket Fair at Rose Belle, he will state if consideration will be given for the provision of \n\n60 \n \nadditional parking facilities in the nearby area of the market and/or construction of a Parking \nTower thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that the Dr. James Burty \nDavid Market Fair in Rose Belle was built and started operating in 2010. It includes 1,067 \nstalls and has about 490 parking spaces over an area of 9,419 m3. Over the years, the number \nof people visiting the market has increased due to the growth of the surrounding population. \nAs a result, parking has become a major issue. Many visitors struggle to find parking space \nand are forced to park along nearby roads, causing traffic congestion and serious safety risks. \nAdditionally, crowded parking areas and blocked access routes make it difficult for vendors \nto operate properly, leading to lower sales and frustration among customers. \nMadam Speaker, to tackle this issue, I have instructed the Chief Executive of the \nDistrict Council of Grand Port to take urgent measures to improve this situation. I will \npersonally monitor the progress and conduct surprise visits to ensure action is being taken. \nRegarding the parking solution, I wish to inform the House that we are planning to \nbuild additional parking facilities near the new food court, with an estimated cost of Rs12 \nmillion, and this project will be included in the next budget for consideration. Recently, 70 \nadditional parking spaces were created by the District Council of Grand Port, but this is \nclearly not enough to solve the problem. \nMadam Speaker, the previous government did absolutely nothing to address this \nparking crisis. Despite repeated complaints from the public, they ignored the problem for \nyears, leaving market visitors and vendors to suffer. On 21 January 2025, I personally visited \nthe Dr James Burty David Market Fair, accompanied by my junior minister and MPs of the \nconstituency. What I found was shocking, Madam Speaker. Not only was parking a major \nissue, but the entire market was in a poor state due to the neglect by the previous \nadministration. The problem includes – \n▪ \nPoor maintenance of the market yard; \n▪ \nDelays in removing wastes, leading to unhygienic conditions after market days; \n▪ \nDirty and unsanitary conditions in the poultry and meat section; \n▪ \nNo fire extinguishers and no valid fire certificate, creating a serious fire hazard; \n▪ \nPigeon droppings on stalls, making the environment unhealthy; \n▪ \nExposed electrical cables causing a major safety risk; \n\n61 \n \n▪ \nNarrow walkways making it difficult for people to move around, especially in an \nemergency; \n▪ \nFilthy public toilets with no proper cleaning; \n▪ \nReport of illegal vendors coming from all over the island to sell goods on parking \nand embarking areas without any control, thus causing obstruction and harming \nlegal traders. \nMadam Speaker, the previous government turned a blind eye to these problems. They \nhad the responsibility to take action, but they failed completely. Now, under this \nadministration, we are taking firm and urgent steps to fix these longstanding issues, and I will \npersonally ensure that the necessary improvements are made, and I will not allow this market \nto continue suffering from the past neglect. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nMr Seeburn: Madam Speaker, now that the hon. Minister mentioned the construction \nof additional parking near the food court at an estimated cost of Rs12 million, can he confirm \nwhen this project will begin and when it is expected to be completed, and also what measures \nwill be taken to prevent illegal parking on adjacent roads and ensure proper management \naround the market area? \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, in fact, this project could have been planned long ago. \nUnfortunately, the previous government, I have just said it, failed to recognise the growing \nneed for additional parking space. They lacked vision and did not allocate funds properly. \nHowever, this government is ensuring that parking expansion is included in the next \nbudget. As soon as funds are allocated, work will begin without further delay. No structure \nplan was put in place to regulate the vehicle flow. So, we are now working with relevant \nauthorities to introduce a designated parking zone, proper signage and traffic enforcement to \naddress this issue. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, I cannot tell you more!  \nHon. Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien! \n \n\n62 \n \nBARACHOIS LA CHAUX, MAHEBOURG – LEASE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/96",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 96,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/96) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the barachois found next to the fisheries post in Mahebourg, he will state if same \nhas been leased and, if so, indicate the name and address of the leaseholder of the barachois.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you, hon. Member. Madam Speaker, I want to inform the House \nthat the barachois found next to the fisheries post in Mahebourg is known as Barachois PG \nRivière La Chaux or Barachois La Chaux and was vested to the Ministry on 19 April 1961. \nIn 2018, part of the Barachois PG Rivière La Chaux, with an extent of 2 acres out of 83 \nacres, was allocated by the Ministry to a company, namely One Two Go Enterprise Limited, \nhaving as Director Mr Chrisna Dattoo and address, Jean Paul Toulet Street, Beau Vallon, for \nundertaking mud crab culture as per the set of conditions. \nThus, the barachois was allocated to the promoter and not leased to One Two Go \nEnterprise Limited. Now, there has been undue delay in the implementation of the project, \nand the matter is being fully investigated. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Apollon: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Thank you, hon. Minister for your answer. \nAs the minister is aware that the said site is in front of the Mahebourg fisheries post, will the \nminister take action for all these illegal damages carried out by the promoters, such as \nbackfilling and cutting of mangroves, especially closing access for fishermen, which was \ntolerated by the previous government? \nDr. Boolell: I thank my hon. friend for conveying the information to us. He can rest \nassured that relevant action is being taken and corrective measures are being taken. The \nmatter is being addressed in a very forceful and meaningful manner. We are told that they \neven erected effects to deny access to fishermen to go on the fishing expedition. Now, he has \nacted contrary to the spirit and the letter of the law, and the matter will be dealt with \naccordingly. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \n\n63 \n \nHon. First Member for Rodrigues! \nMAURITIUS & RODRIGUES – SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT POLICY & \nIMPLEMENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/98",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 98,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/98) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the ambulance services at \nMahebourg hospital, he will state the – \n(a) \nnumber of ambulances – \n\n65 \n \n(i) \ncurrently available and operational;  \n(ii) \nin good working conditions and fully equipped to handle emergencies, \nand  \n(b) \nongoing efforts, if any, to improve the fleet.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I am informed that there are five ambulances which have \nbeen put at the disposal of Mahebourg Hospital as follows – \n• \nThree ambulances with stretchers, out of which two ambulances are operational \non a 24/7 basis and used to convey patients in a lying position. These include \ndialysis patients, patients requiring immediate transfer to Jawaharlal Nehru \nHospital for admission, patients with appointments at the Outpatient Department \nat Victoria Hospital, SSRN Hospital, Moka Hospital, Jeetoo Hospital, National \nCancer Centre, and Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital, and discharged patients. \n• \nThe other one ambulance with a stretcher operates from 8.00 in the morning till \n4.00 in the afternoon and is used for conveying lying patients for physiotherapy \nand dressing. \n• \nMoreover, one ambulance with a stretcher is operational on a 24/7 basis at the \nairport medical post. There is also a 15-seater van which is operational from 8.00 \nin the morning till 10.00 at night and is used for conveyance of dialysis patients to \nJawaharlal Nehru Hospital. \nI am further informed that Mahebourg Hospital, being a district hospital, receives \nsupport from Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital for emergencies requiring SAMU services. There are \ntwo SAMU ambulances posted at Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital, and one is operational on a \n24/7 basis, while the other one operates from 8hrs to 16hrs. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) (ii) of the question, I am informed that out of \nthe five ambulances posted at Mahebourg Hospital, only the one which is on standby at the \nairport hospital and the 15-seater van are in good condition, while the other ambulances need \nreplacement due to frequent breakdowns. However, all the ambulances are equipped with \noxygen cylinders and a first aid box to help in basic emergencies. Moreover, drivers and \nattendants servicing ambulances have all received training in first aid. \n\n66 \n \nMadam Speaker, concerning part (b) of the question, my ministry had prepared a \nreplacement plan for our fleet of vehicles, with priority of consideration being given to the \nreplacement of medical vehicles in the first instance. As such, my ministry will be procuring, \nin this financial year, 10 medical vehicles, including one SAMU ambulance, five ambulances \nand four 15-seater vans, which should be distributed among the different health regions for \nthe smooth conveyance of patients. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, the hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre \nBornes! \nST JEAN ROAD, QUATRE BORNES – FIRE STATION – RELOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/99",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 99,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/99) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Fire Station situated along St \nJean Road, Quatre Bornes, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius \nFire and Rescue Service, information as to whether consideration will be given for the \nrelocation thereof and, if so, give details thereof and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I have been informed that the Mauritius Fire and \nRescue Service (MFRS) started working on the relocation of the Quatre Bornes Fire Station \napproximately six years ago. \nDespite this, the project has not yet started. It is concerning that in the financial years \n2022-2023 and 2023-2024, a total sum of Rs9 m. was allocated for the project. However, due \nto the previous government’s mismanagement, these funds were not used, and the project did \nnot progress. For the financial year 2024-2025, only Rs500,000 has been allocated for this \nproject. \nMadam Speaker, a 7,569 m² plot of land along Tulip Avenue, Quatre Bornes, was \nacquired and officially transferred to the MFRS on 01 October 2019 for the construction of \nthe new fire station. It is also important to highlight that the government currently pays \nRs100,000 annually to the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes for renting the existing fire \nstation premises. \nAdditionally, the MFRS Headquarters located at Atalian Tower, Labourdonnais Street, \nPort Louis, costs the government Rs13,386,000 per year, including VAT. \n\n67 \n \nMadam Speaker, this government is committed to ensuring that this project is \ncompleted as soon as possible. The new fire station project includes not only a fire station but \nalso the new MFRS headquarters, a special operation division, a main control room and a fire \nsafety division. My ministry is closely monitoring this matter. I can inform the House that the \npreliminary drawings for the new fire station and headquarters are currently being prepared \nby the Ministry of National Infrastructure. These drawings should be completed by mid-\nMarch 2025. Once the MFRS approves the plans, a cost estimate will be finalised before \nseeking financial clearance from the Ministry of Finance. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, please! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Je remercie également le \nministre pour la délocalisation de la caserne des pompiers de Quatre Bornes, une initiative \nessentielle pour garantir la sécurité des habitants. Can the hon. Minister provide a clear \ntimeline for when the construction of a new fire station is expected to begin and to be \ncompleted? Thank you. \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, the failure of the previous government to follow up on \nthe project has caused significant delays. During a cluster meeting on 17 February 2025, \nchaired by the Director of Architect, the MFRS raised concerns about the delays in this \nproject and emphasised the need for urgent action. \nAt the Project Steering Committee Meeting on 06 February 2025 chaired by the \nPermanent Secretary of my ministry, the Deputy Director of the Ministry of National \nInfrastructure (MNI) confirmed that updated preliminary drawings would be ready by the end \nof February 2025. However, the MNI has now stated that they will be submitted by mid-\nMarch 2025. \nMadam Speaker, this project is a priority for this government. Despite the delay under \nthe previous administration, we are committed to seeing it through. With the completion of \nthe preliminary plans by mid-March 2025 and the necessary financial approvals, we will \nensure that the new Quatre Bornes Fire Station and MFRS Headquarters are built as soon as \npossible. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! The hon. Third Member for Rodrigues! \n \n \n\n68 \n \nRODRIGUES – MINISTRY OF SPORTS & COMMISSIONER OF SPORTS – \nMEETING – KEY ISSUES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/100",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 100,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/100) Mrs D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the \nMinister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the recent meeting held between the \nMinistry of Sports and the Commissioner of Sports in Rodrigues, he will state the key issues \ndiscussed during the meeting, indicating the outcomes or proposed collaborative initiatives \nagreed upon.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, Mr Joseph Varok Ravina, Commissioner for Youth \nand Sports in Rodrigues, accompanied by his officers, paid a courtesy call on me on 20 \nFebruary 2025. He expressed his concerns about the disastrous effects of synthetic drugs, \nwhich have found their way to Rodrigues. During the discussion, the latter stressed the urgent \nneed to protect the youth and sought the help of my ministry in this endeavour. \nRegarding sports, Mr Ravina mentioned the revival of the Jeux de Rodrigues. He has \nexpressed the wish for the support of my ministry in this project. He has also pledged for \nmore consideration towards Rodriguan athletes, especially in the composition of national \nteams. Moreover, the Commissioner has submitted proposals for the drafting of the new \nSports Act. \nMadam Speaker, my ministry will give due consideration to the request of the \nCommissioner. The vision of the government has been shared with the Commissioner of \nYouth and Sports, and he was also reassured of the inclination of my ministry to search for \nyouth and sports talents wherever they are, including Rodrigues. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMrs Henriette-Manan: Mrs Henriette-Manan: Thank you, hon. Minister. Is the hon. \nMinister aware that there have been cases during which national sports competitions \noccurring in Mauritius had no participants from Rodrigues due to the unavailability of funds \nto cater for the flights and accommodation of participants? Will the hon. Minister consider \nmeasures, through his ministry, that can help the RRA with systematic funding for \nparticipants, qualified sportspersons from Rodrigues, to participate in high-level competition \nin all sports disciplines? As many are aware, Rodrigues has many qualified sportspersons \nwho have brought national pride to the Republic.  \n\n69 \n \nMr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, my Ministry will provide technical assistance for \nall games. However, in respect of funds, same are provided by the central Government to the \nRodrigues Regional Assembly for various sectors as listed in the Fourth Schedule of the \nRodrigues Regional Assembly Act. The Fourth Schedule lists youth and sport as one of the \nareas of responsibility to be exercised by the Rodrigues Regional Assembly. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \nMr François: Madam Speaker, with due respect to our autonomy, may I ask the hon. \nMinister whether discussion was also held with regard to the creation of a decentralised \nComité régional olympique et sportif rodriguais representing all regional committees in \nRodrigues? \nMadam Speaker: That’s another… \nMr Nagalingum: There was no such discussion. \nMadam Speaker: Il abuse hein. Bon, allez. The hon. Second Member for Quartier \nMilitaire and Moka!  \nPRIVATE GRANT-AIDED SECONDARY SCHOOLS – MANAGERS & \nASSISTANT MANAGER",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/101",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 101,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/101) Dr. Ms Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to Private grant-\naided Secondary Schools, he will state – \n(a)  the number of Managers thereat granted registration despite not meeting the \neligibility criteria, indicating if his Ministry proposes to inquire into the matter \nand, if so, the actions being envisaged in cases of malpractices, and  \n(b)  if the post of Assistant Manager has been formally established and approved \nthereat and, if so, since when and if the post will be maintained.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, I would like to thank the Second Member for \nQuartier Militaire and Moka for this question. \nI wish to inform the House that the registration of managers for these schools is \ngoverned by sections 11A, 12 and 13 of the Education Act, as amended by Act No. 12 of \n\n70 \n \n2023. These provisions establish the eligibility criteria and registration requirements for \nmanagers, including conditions under which registration may be refused. \nIn line with these regulations, all managers should apply for registration and renewal \nannually. Circular letter No. 41 of 2023 was issued by the Private Secondary Education \nAuthority to inform managers of these requirements and that applications were to be \nsubmitted by 30 November 2023. \nAs at date, the registration status is as follows for the 108 schools Private grant-aided \nsecondary schools – \n1. \nManagers have been registered for 91 schools; \n2. \nApplications for registration of manager for 13 schools are in process, and  \n3. \nNo application for registration of manager for 4 schools. \nOn 16 December 2024, after changement, the Authority sought the approval of my \nministry for the registration of the few Managers in respect of whose applications pertain to – \n1. \nThose age 70 and above;  \n2. \nThe schools for which no applications for registration of Manager had been \nreceived, and \n3. \nA secondary school (boys/girls) in the Eastern region; I am not naming it.  \nI am informed that the ‘no objection’ of my Ministry has been conveyed thereto. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that the post of Assistant \nManager does not exist under the Education Act and the Private Secondary Education Act, \nand schools are under the responsibility of a manager.  \nThank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, the hon. Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! Hon. A. Duval! \nMOTOR VEHICLES - NOISE POLLUTION - CONTRAVENTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/102",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 102,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/102) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change \nwhether, in regard to noise pollution, occurring as a result of modified motorcycle exhausts \nand loud music in motor vehicles, houses and on public beaches, he will state the – \n\n71 \n \n(a) \nnumber of contraventions booked since November 2024 to date; \n(b) number of Police Officers currently posted at the Police de l’Environnement in the \nNorthern, Eastern, Western and Southern Divisions, and  \n(c)  enforcement actions being taken by his Ministry to address same.",
      "answer": "Mr Bhagwan: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that for \nthe period 01 November 2024 to 28 February 2025, 190 contraventions have been established \nwith regard to loud noises emanating from modified motorcycle exhausts and loud music \nfrom vehicles, from premises and public beaches in breach of – \n(i) \nRegulations 83(2) and 83(3) of the Road Traffic (Construction and Use of \nVehicles) Regulations 2010 concerning exhaust silencer systems not in good \nand efficient working order and the alteration of silencers, respectively; \n(ii) \nRegulation 84(3) for using motor vehicle causing excessive noise, and  \n(iii) \nthe Environment Protection (Control of Noise) Regulations 2022.  \nI am further informed that out of 190 contraventions, 53 have been established by the \nPolice de l’Environnement while the remaining 137 contraventions have been established at \nthe level of the Emergency Response Service (ERS) and the seven Divisions of the Police \nDepartment.  \nMadam Speaker, with your permission, I am tabling the breakdown of the \ncontraventions. \nThe House may wish to note that 190 contraventions (53 from the Police de \nl’Environnement and 137 from the Police Department) for noise nuisance have been \nestablished from November 2024 to February 2025 compared to 153 contraventions (34 from \nPolice de l’Environnement and 119 from Police Department) for the four previous months, \nnamely from July 2024 to October 2024. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, the Police de l’Environnement \nis currently manned by 33 Police Officers and is led by an Inspector of Police. The Officers \nare deployed in seven Divisional Environment Protection Teams to provide service island-\nwide, and the main office (Headquarters) is based in Port Louis. The staffing position is as \nfollows – \n• Northern Division  \n \n4 officers \n• Eastern Division  \n \n3 officers \n\n72 \n \n• Western Division \n \n5 officers \n• Southern Division  \n \n3 officers \n• Central Division  \n \n4 officers \n• Headquarters \n \n \n5 officers \n• Port Louis (North)  \n \n3 officers  \n• Port Louis (South)  \n \n4 officers \nThe Divisions are under the responsibility of two sub-inspectors. My Ministry is also having \ndiscussions with the Commissioner of Police to increase the number of staff posted at the \nPolice de l’Environnement to ensure better enforcement actions. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (c) of the question, crackdown operations are \ncarried out island-wide by the Police de l’Environnement in relation to noise pollution. \nBesides, as a preventive measure, awareness/sensitisation campaigns are being conducted \nthrough community policing with the support of neighbourhood police. \nAs for noise nuisances caused on public beaches, Police de l’Environnement will \nintensify their presence and will initiate appropriate actions in connection with the coast \nguard. \nMy ministry is closely monitoring the situation, and amendments to Regulations are \nbeing envisaged for tougher penalties. My ministry would even consider the seizure of motor \nvehicles for repeated offenders. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to take this opportunity to express my thanks to the \nCommissioner of Police for his active support and collaboration, and I commend the staff \nposted at the Police de l’Environnement for their commitment and dedication in the \nperformance of their duties. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, 190 contraventions are nearly not enough, \nunfortunately, when we see the number of motorcycles nowadays driving all around \nMauritius, especially in coastal areas, which is becoming a real hazard for people. The quality \nof life of people se fait dégrader with these, let alone the loud music on public beaches, etc.  \n\n73 \n \nSo, 190 contraventions still seem very little for so much, even if it is an improvement \nfrom before. Can the minister seriously look into setting up a task force of the officers of the \nPolice de l’Environnement together with the local police stations so that we enforce road \ntraffic rules with regard to these motorcycles which are known to local police? Every day, \nthey drive their motorcycles; every day, they create noise pollution. Safe City also can help. \nWill the minister look into the matter? Because people are really complaining now as the use \nof light exhaust has become exaggerated. \nMr Bhagwan: Madam Speaker, this is not a new phenomenon; this is also the case in \ntowns, in urban areas, and in coastal regions. Since I have taken over the ministry with my \nyoung colleague, the Junior Minister, hon. Ms J. Bérenger, we have actively been working on \nthis issue. I do not know what the performance was before, from the previous minister. He \nwas busy looking after his notary office. But we are actively working with the Commissioner \nof Police, and we are also appealing to the public in general, de dénoncer, de participer à \ncette action collective, non seulement en informant la Police de l’Environnement, au niveau \ndes stations de police et de venir dénoncer. We are in Parliament. We need people to go to \npolice stations et dénoncer, donner les plaques d’immatriculation, et je suis sûr que le \nnouveau Commissaire de Police, unlike his predecessor who was using the Striking Team for \nother things, is also working to find ways and means, at least to better perform, I can say, \nwithin the parameters of the law. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, it is regrettable that, for now, the situation has not \nimproved. In fact, these users of motorcycles also go on public beaches, like I said, but there \nis a laisser-aller on the part of the police as well because they know these people, and they do \nnot stop them. So, why did I say a taskforce? I think it’s time. I would suggest that the hon. \nminister see with the Prime Minister that we use special units to crack down… \nAn hon. Member: Laisser-aller la mem ki …  \nMr A. Duval: To crack down, stop and enforce these regulations because local Police \nStations…   \nAn hon. Member: Laisser-aller la… \nMadam Speaker: I can’t hear…  \nMr A. Duval: Atan do matlo ! To pou koze tou le 2 minit ? \n\n74 \n \nMadam Speaker: You have the floor, don’t … \nMr Jhummun:  Aster to pe … \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, you need to…  \nMr Jhummun: Depi 10 an pe ale sa ! \nMr A. Duval: I mean, how long are we going to go with this? This guy has been \nshouting at every turn.  \nMadam Speaker: I don’t appreciate all this going on, at all! Hon. Jhummun, let him \nspeak. Then you can stand up and speak if you want! Okay? \nMr Jhummun: Okay. \nMadam Speaker: You finish your sentence.  \nMr A. Duval: Yes. Thank you. Madam Speaker, what I am saying is local police…  \nMadam Speaker: It’s a very simple problem; we know the problem! \nMr A. Duval: … local police seem powerless today. \nMadam Speaker: Question! Question! \nMr A. Duval: The question is whether he will look into it because with his 33 Police \nOfficers, it is nearly not enough to enforce; whether he will look at utilising other units of the \nPolice to make sure that there are crackdowns all over the island. \nMadam Speaker: We got your message! Will you do that, please, Minister? \nMr Bhagwan: Madame la présidente, il n’y a plus de laisser-aller. Le laisser-aller, \nc’était dans le passé, lorsqu’il était au gouvernement.  \n(Interruptions) \nIl n’y a plus de laisser-aller. Maintenant, le nouveau Commissaire de Police, la Police \nde l’Environnement, y compris moi-même et la Junior Minister de l’Environnement, sommes \nen train d’agir.  \nMadam Speaker: Les policiers sur place! \nMr Bhagwan: Il n’y a plus de laisser-aller, Madame. Peut-être à son époque, lorsqu’il \nétait au gouvernement, c’était un laisser-aller. C’était comme ça! \nMadam Speaker: Not too much! Not too much!  \n\n75 \n \nOkay. Where am I? Now, I’ll have hon. Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine \nMagnien, Mr Lukeeram! \nPLEIN BOIS, CARREAU ESNOUF & CARREAU ACCACIA – ROUTES  10A, 137 & \n99 – IRREGULAR BUS SERVICE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/103",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 103,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/103) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the irregular bus services in the \nregion of Plein Bois, Carreau Esnouf and Carreau Accacia, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information as to whether \nconsideration will be given for the provision of a regular bus service along Route No. 10A, \nL’Escalier/Plein Bois to Curepipe; Route 137, Carreau Accacia to Curepipe via Rose-Belle \nand Route 99, from Carreau Accacia to Mahebourg, respectively.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the National Land \nTransport Authority that there is a regular bus service along Routes 10A, 137 and 99. Three \nroutes, so I will go one by one for the sake of clarity. \nIn fact, there are currently 21 buses of individual operators and two from the United \nBus Service Ltd which operate along Route 10A (L’Escalier/Plein Bois to Curepipe) at \nintervals of 20 and 30 minutes during peak and off-peak hours, respectively. The first bus \nleaves La Sourdine at 5 o’clock in the morning and Curepipe at 6 o’clock in the morning, \nwhile the last trip from La Sourdine and Jan Palach is at 18:20 hrs and 19:00hrs, respectively. \nFurthermore, nine trips are performed both in the morning and afternoon in respect of school \nservices. \nHowever, I am informed that this route has been subject to repeated complaints from \ncommuters in relation to a shortage of buses during school times, coupled with some bus \noperators not adhering to the established timetable. However, as confirmed by the NLTA, \nwith the integration of two temporary licences allocated to Lone Star Company Ltd and \nMuzput Company Ltd to operate along Route 10A since 21 February 2024 and 13 August \n2024, respectively, the service has reasonably improved. So, this solution is supposed to be \nworking seemingly according to the NLTA, unless you differ. \nAs regards Route 137 (Carreau Accacia to Curepipe via Rose-Belle and Carreau \nEsnouf), nine buses, that is, three belonging to the NTC and six from individual operators, are \nlicensed to operate thereat. \n\n76 \n \nHowever, it is worth noting that four buses belonging to individual operators have \nceased operations since October 2018, January 2023, November 2023, and January 2025, \nrespectively, for various reasons, including the sale and non-replacement of the said buses. \nThe three buses of the National Transport Company have been in operation along that route \nsince May 2021. \nMoreover, arrangements are ongoing for an additional bus of the NTC to provide its \nservice along the same route. As regards the bus which has been off the road since 2018, my \nministry has requested the NLTA to consider the licence of the said bus as being lapsed and \ninitiate prompt actions for the licensing of another bus accordingly. Additionally, the NLTA \nhas been urged to convene the bus operators whose buses have been off the road since 2023 \nto press upon them for the replacement thereof. I believe this will provide relief given time, \nhopefully. \nComing to Route 99 (Carreau Accacia to Mahebourg), Madam Speaker, I am informed \nthat there are presently three buses of individual operators which are licensed to operate on \nthe said route at intervals of 30 and 45 minutes during peak and off-peak times, respectively. \nThese buses have to operate from 6 o’clock in the morning up to 6 o’clock in the evening. \nGiven that there have been numerous complaints due to only two buses operating along this \nroute, an additional licence has been granted to one operator on a temporary basis since \nJanuary 2024 to improve service. I hope this is the case. \nNow, in view of the repeated complaints received on the poor level of public bus \ntransport services along many routes, my ministry is working on several remedial actions \nwhich I had elaborated earlier on in my reply to PQ B/93 and at our Sitting of Tuesday 04 \nFebruary 2025 in reply to PQ B/22. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes! \nMr Apollon: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Comme vous le savez tous, le plus gros \nproblème sur cette ligne, comme vous l’avez mentionné, c’est qu’il y a beaucoup de permis \nindividuels. Mais malheureusement, ces propriétaires de bus, des fois, ils font exprès pour ne \npas travailler parce qu’ils disent que ce n’est pas rentable. Est-ce que le ministre peut \nconsidérer de voir avec la National Transport Authority pour donner un bon service ou même \nmener une enquête pour savoir pourquoi les bus individuels refusent de travailler pour \nmanque de revenus sur cette route-là ? Merci. \n\n77 \n \nMr Osman Mahomed: The problems are multipronged, actually; I explained before. \nFirstly, not enough people are travelling by buses because now everyone has motorcycles and \nmotorbikes. So, buses used to be powerpack full once upon a time. This is no longer the case, \nand this is a big challenge. Unfortunately, their timetable is not adjusted accordingly. So, we \nhad to rework this. Then, the other challenge that is being faced by bus operators is the \navailability of competent drivers. So, these are the two issues we are facing islandwide, \nMadam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Yes, hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes! \nMR K.R.'S. NOTARIAL OFFICE – SQUARE DEAL MULTI-PURPOSE \nCOOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD – EIA CERTIFICATE APPLICATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/104",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 104,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/104) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, \nin regard to Mr K.R.'s. notarial office, he will state if the former Minister of Environment, \nSolid Waste Management and Climate Change was, directly or indirectly, involved in support \nof the application for an Environment Impact Assessment Certificate in respect of Square \nDeal Multi-Purpose Cooperative Society Limited and, if so, indicate the actions, if any, being \nenvisaged thereon.",
      "answer": "Mr Bhagwan: Madam Speaker, let me at the outset thank the hon. Member for putting \nthis question, as this will give me an opportunity to enlighten the House on the way my \npredecessor, who was, at the material time, a notary, was functioning as a minister. \nMadam Speaker, the issue of an application for an EIA licence by Square Deal Multi-\nPurpose Cooperative Society Limited was first raised in this House on 12 June 2024 in a \nPrivate Notice question by the then Leader of the Opposition, hon. Dr. Arvin Boolell and was \nreplied to – do you know by whom? The then Attorney General, Mr Gobin! \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, Square Deal Multi-Purpose \nCooperative Society Limited made an application for an EIA licence with regard to a \nproposed residential commercial morcellement at Queen Victoria to my ministry on 08 May \n2024. I am informed that the documents submitted were not in order. Given that the notary \ncertificate contained the seal of Étude Me Kavydass Ramano, notary public, and was not \nsigned by a notary public in accordance with Section 18(1)(c)(iv) of the Environment Act \n2002, but by an unidentified person. \n\n78 \n \nOn 21 May 2024, the proponent and its consultant were requested to submit a new \nnotary certificate. Will you believe it, Madam Speaker, within 24 hours, that is, on 22 May \n2024, a new certificate was signed by whom? By a notary public and was submitted to the \nministry. The submission of the first document, which was not signed by a notary public, and \nthe rapidity with which the new notary certificate was produced to my ministry is a clear \nindication that there was collusion between the then Minister of Environment, Solid Waste \nManagement and Climate Change, and his notarial office, which was, at all material times, \nnot only functioning but trading. \nMadam Speaker, I am duty bound to inform the House that the then Attorney General, \nin his reply to Private Notice Question to the then Leader of the Opposition, hon. Dr. Arvin \nBoolell, did mislead the House on several aspects of the EIA application and was thus party \nto a cover-up operation to protect his colleague, Mr Kavydass Ramano. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to the case of the EIA application made by Square Deal \nMulti-Purpose Cooperative Society Limited, my ministry is conducting an internal audit to \nfind out whether there have been other cases of collusion between the then Minister of \nEnvironment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change and his notarial office. \nIt is clear that there are reasonable grounds to refer the matter to the Financial Crimes \nCommission to elucidate whether Mr Kavydass Ramano has acted in breach of the existing \nlegislation in respect of conflict of interest and public official using his office for gratification \nand trafic d’influence. \nAn hon. Member: Shame! \nMr Jhummun: Bizin ena lanket! \nAn hon. Member: Met taskforce! \nMr Jhummun: Bizin ena lanket! \nMr Mohamed: Sa mem lin dir la ta! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Pour vous dire, je suis \nscandalisée. Je suis scandalisée et révoltée par la réponse de l’honorable ministre Bhagwan. \nNous sommes face à une affaire d’une gravité absolue ! \nMadam Speaker: Mademoiselle, question please. Question! \n\n79 \n \nMs Anquetil: Je note que le ministre prévoit de renvoyer ce dossier à la FCC pour \nd’éventuelles infractions pénales. Puis-je, Madame la présidente… \nMadam Speaker: Voilà, question! \nMs Anquetil: Puis-je demander à l’honorable ministre s’il compte également saisir la \nChambre des notaires afin qu’une enquête approfondie soit menée sur le notaire R pour \ndéterminer s’il a violé le code de déontologie, et si tel est le cas, si des sanctions doivent être \nprises sous le Law Practitioners Act ? Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Je vous en prie. \nMr Bhagwan: Madam Speaker, definitely we will do everything to elucidate where \nthere has been trafic d’influence, but we all know, and not only for la Chambre des notaires \nbut for all those qui sont impliqués dans ce scandale. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien, Mr \nLukeeram!\n \nMAHEBOURG MARKET – RENOVATION WORKS – FINANCIAL CLEARANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/105",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 105,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/105) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the works for the renovation of \nthe Mahebourg Market, he will state if his Ministry is in presence of any request from the \nDistrict Council of Grand Port for financial clearance for the renovation work of the market \nand, if so, indicate where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I am informed that a request for financial clearance has \nbeen submitted by the District Council of Grand Port on 29 August 2024 amounting to Rs5.1 \nm. for the construction of stalls and also to undertake lighting works at the Mahebourg \nmarket. Moreover, the then Ministry of Finance, Economic Planning and Development did \nnot accede to that request, and instead, the Council was informed that it should consider using \nthe existing metal stalls in the upgrading market and meet expenses amounting to Rs2.1 m. \npertaining to lighting works from within its current budget. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to highlight that the previous Ministry of Finance, Economic \nPlanning and Development did not consider it important and useful to provide the necessary \nfunding to all the local authorities, including the District Council of Grand Port, with respect \nto the maintenance of their amenities. The outgoing government invested Rs12 m. in the \nupgrading of the external structure of the Mahebourg market and did not consider it necessary \n\n80 \n \nto provide an additional sum of Rs5 m. to construct the new stalls and do some lighting \nworks. The new market was also inaugurated in toute vitesse without any new stalls, lighting, \nand fire certificate just before the last general elections by the former Minister of National \nInfrastructure and Community Development. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to highlight that I effected a site visit at the Mahebourg market \non 21 January 2025, whereby I asked the representative of the District Council of Grand Port \nto adhere to all fire safety norms as well as to expedite matters for the obtention of a fire \ncertificate and to conduct a proper survey and submit a detailed breakdown for all the works \nthat need to be carried out at the said market, including associated costs, following which my \nministry would seek additional funds from the Ministry of Finance to complete the project. \nMoreover, I have laid emphasis on the fact that this project will have to be completed at \nthe earliest possible as it is long overdue. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nMr Apollon: Merci, Madam Speaker, et merci, l’honorable ministre. Concernant la \ndeuxième partie du marché qui a été rénovée comme vous avez si bien dit dans votre réponse, \nils ont fait l’inauguration avec la télévision et tout, mais malheureusement, le lendemain c’est \nfermé parce que ce n’est pas complété à 100%. Le ministre peut-il voir avec le District \nCouncil pour débloquer la situation, laisser les maraichers commencer à travailler avec leur \npropre table, parce que le seul issue qui n’est pas encore fait c’est les tables. Cela cause un \ngros problème pour le marché de Mahebourg. Si le ministre peut voir cela assez rapidement \npour laisser travailler les maraîchers de Mahebourg. Merci. \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, as I have just said, the new market does not have a fire \ncertificate. So, by the time we adhere to the fire certificate, we may put up new stalls where \nthe vendors can sell their commodities in a safe and clean manner. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \nPSEA – GRANTS ALLOCATION – PRIVATE GRANT-AIDED SECONDARY \nSCHOOLS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/106",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 106,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/106) Mrs A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to \ncomplaints made against the Private Secondary Education Authority for the allocation of \n\n81 \n \ngrants to Private grant-aided Secondary Schools, he will state if his Ministry will initiate an \ninquiry thereon.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, I would like to thank the First Member for Port \nLouis North and Montagne Longue for this question. \nWith regard to complaints made by private grant-aided secondary schools against the \nAuthority, the main concerns raised by managers relate to various operational and financial \nmatters. In recent times, the key issues brought forward include the need to review the \ncomprehensive grant formula, the shortage of educators in private secondary schools, the \nstatus of a secondary school for boys and girls located in the eastern region, and complaints \nagainst another college. \nThe last review of the comprehensive grant formula was conducted in September 2023 \nfor the 2024-2026 period. Two legal cases were filed against the Private Secondary Education \nAuthority concerning the comprehensive grant formula. One challenging the 2020-2023 \nformula, which was overturned by the Supreme Court, and another against the 2024-2026 \nformula, which is still under review. An application for conditional leave to appeal the \nSupreme Court’s judgement of 25 July 2024 to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council \nmade on 19 August 2024. The Supreme Court granted leave on 04 February 2025, but on 18 \nFebruary 2025, the appeal was withdrawn at the request of the applicant’s counsel. \nMadam Speaker, with a view to addressing concerns regarding the comprehensive grant \nformula, Government has approved the introduction of a new formula for the period 2025-\n2027. When I say Government, it is this Government, the present Government. A technical \nworking group chaired by the Senior Chief Executive of my Ministry and including key \nstakeholders has been set up to – \n(i) \nReview the grant formula; \n(ii) \nAddress any shortcomings in validation and disbursement, and \n(iii) Make recommendations. \nA first meeting was held on 17 January 2025. Pending this review, the Private Education \nSecondary Authority has disbursed grants on an interim basis to facilitate the running and \nupkeep of the private secondary schools. \nRegarding the shortage of educators in private secondary schools, managers have raised \nconcerns following the implementation of the Education (Amendment No. 4) Regulations \n\n82 \n \n2023 – this is the legacy we have from the previous government. Alright? They messed up \nwith everything, and we are trying to sort out things now – which introduced new \nqualification requirements for educators, including the requirement to hold a degree in the \nsubject to be taught and a Post Graduate Certificate in Education (PGCE). \nThis amendment led to a shortage of educators in 2024 in private secondary schools, as \nmany potential candidates did not meet these stringent criteria, though they were graduates, \nsome of the University of Mauritius. In response to these concerns, the Education \n(Amendment) Regulations 2025 have been introduced, whereby the requirement for a PGCE \nprior to recruitment has been waived. Furthermore, educators will no longer be required to \nhold a degree in the subject to be taught but rather a degree related to the subject to be taught. \nHowever, they will be encouraged to have their PGCE within a reasonable timeframe after \nbeing recruited. \nAs regards a school found in the eastern region, a case has been lodged before the \nSupreme Court by Mr V.C.J. in his capacity as trustee against the Authority. The case seeks, \namong others, the disbursement of grants to the schools and the appointment of new \nmanagers in compliance with instructions from the trustee. Legal advice is presently being \nsought on these matters. \nMadam Speaker, I also wish to inform the House that my ministry remains committed \nto addressing concerns raised by stakeholders in the private secondary education sector and \nensuring that all matters are handled in a fair and transparent manner. This is changement. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nMrs Savabaddy: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Je remercie l’honorable ministre pour sa \nréponse.  \nIl y a eu ce cas d’un collège dans l’est, M. le ministre, contre lequel leur psy réclame \nune enquête pour divers abus. Par exemple, les parents doivent payer R 2 600 – je cite bien – \npour la PTA, sinon leurs enfants n’auront pas accès aux manuels scolaires distribués \ngratuitement par le gouvernement aux salles d’examens. En sus des autres maldonnes, \nl’honorable ministre peut-il demander à ses officiers d’enquêter sur ces abus afin de mettre \nfin à de telles pratiques ? Je cite : ‘À noter que ce collège précis reçoit une compensation du \ngouvernement, R 350 000 mensuellement pour les dépenses administratives et pour la \nmaintenance de l’école, sachant qu’annuellement ils reçoivent R 140 millions.’ Merci. \n\n83 \n \nDr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, I would reassure the hon. Member that we are \nbeing proactive; we did not wait for the PQ in order to initiate, in order to create, an \nindependent committee which is reviewing the mechanism in which this secondary school, \nwhich we are not naming; neither you nor me, is managing funds. Rest assured everything is \nbeing done in all transparency and accountability is definitely at the top of the agenda. Thank \nyou. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Ramkalawon: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Is the Minister aware that last year, it \nwas during the month of August and September that a massive recruitment was done by the \nex-government? This created a great problem within private secondary schools. What are \nsome of the measures that the minister can propose so that, in this coming year, we do not \nface the same problem? Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Minister! \nDr. Gungapersad: This is something that is ongoing. I understand the sector, just like \nthe hon. Member. Very often, when PSC advertises for posts in secondary schools, there is an \ninflux, as educators who work in private secondary schools move from private to state \nsecondary schools, creating a void in the private secondary schools. So, that is why we have \nwaived that PGCE thing and we have enlarged this spectrum of recruitment for educators. \nThat is why, for the subject to be taught, they need a degree related to that subject. This is \ngoing to ease the situation. And fortunately, the public is aware that this year, we did not have \na shortage of staff thanks to this government. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Yes, Ms Collet, the hon. First Member for Rodrigues! \nINFANT MORTALITY RATE – STATISTICS – CHILD WELFARE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/107",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 107,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/107) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nGender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to infant mortality, she will state the \nnumber thereof island wide during the last three years, indicating the amount of fund \nearmarked annually by her Ministry for child welfare.",
      "answer": "Mrs Navarre-Marie: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the number of infant \nmortality for mainland Mauritius stands at 165, 157 and 173 for the year 2022, 2023 and \n\n84 \n \n2024, respectively, while for the island of Rodrigues stands at seven, 11 and 11, respectively, \nfor the same period. \nWith regard to the second part of the question for child welfare, for the Financial Year \n2024-2025, a total sum of around Rs19,500,000 has been earmarked. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Seeburn! \nBOIS DES AMOURETTES, BAMBOUS VIRIEUX & GRAND SABLE – NETWORK \nCOVERAGE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/108",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 108,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "To ask the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/108) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in \nregard to the coastal areas along Bois des Amourettes, Bambous Virieux and Grand Sable, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from Mauritius Telecom, information as to whether \nconsideration will be given for the installation of additional telephone aerial/antenna to \nimprove the signals for telecommunications in these areas.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Second Member for Vieux Grand \nPort and Rose Belle. An interesting problem has been raised, and this also links up to the \nquestion that was asked around two weeks back with regard to the network coverage. \nMadam Speaker, you see, this is the legacy of the previous government, and we have \nseen the digital divide increasing. So, the concept of e-inclusion was set onto a secondary \nplane. I am informed by Mauritius Telecom, Madam Speaker, that it has several \ntelecommunication towers in that region, namely at Vieux Grand Port, Anse Jonchée, \nBambous Virieux, Grand Sable, and Pointe du Diable. \nHowever, due to the winding roads and elevation of the terrain, that is, the topology of \nthat region, as well as the natural features of that space, these towers do not provide adequate \ncoverage thereat. Mauritius Telecom has envisaged the deployment of additional towers in \nthe region and has accordingly initiated site search exercises in view of securing new \nlocations. These exercises were, nevertheless, not successful since most of the lands \nidentified are state-owned and have already been allocated to particulars. \nMadam Speaker, my ministry will, in collaboration with the Ministry of Housing and \nLands, provide the necessary support to Mauritius Telecom Ltd in finding an appropriate site \n\n85 \n \nfor the setting up of an antenna to enhance telecommunications coverage in the region. Thank \nyou. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes. \nMr Seeburn: Would the hon. Minister also consider urging the other network \nproviders, such as Emtel and MTML in particular, to equally improve their current services \nso as to have better mobile network coverage in these areas? \nDr. Ramtohul: Madam Speaker, the other providers are obviously private companies, \nand as far as they are in compliance with the provisions of the ICT Authority, we are satisfied \nwith their service. However, given the issue with the coverage, we will extend the same \ncollaborative approach to all the operators. I think I should mention as well that Mauritius \nTelecom does carry out proactive tests in various regions. So, I would also encourage other \nMembers who do identify those challenges to let us know so that we can enhance the \ncoverage, and we can also extend e-inclusion and close the digital divide. Thank you, Madam \nSpeaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, the hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES – SPECIALISTS/SENIOR SPECIALISTS – TOUR OF SERVICE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/109",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 109,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/109) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nHealth and Wellness whether, in regard to specialists of the public health sector on official \nvisits to Rodrigues, he will state the – \n(a) \nfrequency and duration of their visits, and  \n(b) \nnumber of visits effected by each specialist, since January 2024 to date, indicating \nthe measures, if any, his Ministry proposes to take for a more effective service.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I am informed that presently Specialists/Senior \nSpecialists are posted to Rodrigues on a monthly tour of service in the following specialities \n– \n• Anaesthesia; \n• General Medicine; \n• General Surgery; \n• Obstetrics and Gynaecology; \n\n86 \n \n• Orthopaedic Surgery; \n• Paediatrics; \n• Radiology. \nIn other specialities, the duration of the tour of service varies depending on the \ndemands from Rodrigues in terms of the number of patients awaiting specialist services. \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed that in addition to the monthly visit, \nSpecialists/Senior Specialists in the following fields are sent on short visits to Rodrigues at \nthe following frequency – \n• Cardiology – 8 times yearly; \n• ENT/Ophthalmology – 6 times yearly; \n• Oncology – 5 times yearly; \n• Gastroenterology, orthodontics, nephrology, and physical medicines – 4 times \nyearly; \n• Dermatology, neurosurgery, oncology, oral surgery, plastic surgery – 2 times \nyearly, and \n• Gastroenterology – once yearly. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that from January 2024 to date, in addition to \nthe short visits, a total of 90 monthly tours of service to Rodrigues have been effected in the \nfields of anaesthesia, general medicine, general surgery, obstetrics and gynaecology, \northopaedic surgery, paediatrics, and radiology. \nMadam Speaker, I have taken note that in certain fields like dermatology, neurosurgery, \noncology, oral surgery, plastic surgery, and gastroenterology, the frequency of short visits is \ninadequate. I wish to assure the House that the frequency of these short visits will be \nrevisited.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay, the hon. Second Member for Quartier Militaire-Moka. \nCHILD DEVELOPMENT UNIT – REFORM & PROFESSIONAL TRAINING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/110",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 110,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/110) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the Child \nDevelopment Unit (CDU), she will state – \n\n87 \n \n(a) \nif her Ministry will consider reviewing the current procedures to ensure prompt \nand professional services in urgent cases of child trauma;  \n(b) \nthe ongoing professional training provided to new and existing employees of the \nUnit, and  \n(c) \nif access to therapy services is provided to employees at the CDU to support them \nin their professional performance.",
      "answer": "Mrs Navarre-Marie: Madam Speaker, my ministry has already initiated the necessary \nactions to review the current procedures of the Child Development Unit (CDU). A contract \nfor consultancy services for a reform in child services was awarded to the University of \nTechnology Mauritius in December last year. This initiative aims to undertake a \ncomprehensive reform of child services. The objective of the consultancy services is to gain \ninsights into the current structure, policies, procedures, and practices within the CDU, \nidentify gaps, and adopt necessary remedial actions. \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed that the consultancy team will submit a final report \nwith recommendations by the end of September 2025.  \nI further wish to inform the House that my Ministry organised an Assises de la femme et \nde la famille on December 10 last year with the collaboration of NGOs and other \nstakeholders to explore, among other matters, ways and means to enhance our services \nrelated to the protection of children in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the \nRights of the Child, to which Mauritius is a signatory. \nMadam Speaker, regarding part (b) of the question, as far as ongoing professional \ntraining is concerned, I understand that we are already providing such training to new and \nexisting employees of the unit. These trainings are conducted by the psychologists of the \nMinistry, ensuring that child trauma cases are handled professionally and in line with the best \ninternational practices.  \nI am further informed that through interactive sessions, case studies, and practical \nexercises, some 52 officers of the CDU have gained valuable insights into, inter alia, the \ntrauma-informed approach, which is a way of working that considers the impact of trauma on \npeople, including children, groups, and communities, among others. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (c) of the question, I am informed that during the \nperiod 2024-2025, free psychological services have been available for 10 staff members at \n\n88 \n \nthe CDU to help them overcome any emotional trauma. These psychological services, \nincluding psychotherapy and counselling, are provided free of charge upon request. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! Hon. Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka!  \nI am sorry, one moment. I thought you had another question? \nDr. Ms Thannoo: I am sorry. Yes! \nMadam Speaker: I was right! \nDr. Ms Thannoo: You were right! Thank you, Madam Speaker. B/111, please! \nFOREIGN WORKERS – RECRUITMENT & ILLEGAL OVERSTAY (2019 TO 2024)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/111",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 111,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/111) Dr. Ms Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to foreign workers, \nhe will state the number thereof – \n(a)  recruited on a monthly basis over the period 30 May 2024 to 31 October 2024 \nand the monthly corresponding figures for the past 5 years, indicating the \neconomic sector and skills concerned, and  \n(b)  currently illegally overstaying in Mauritius.",
      "answer": "Mr Uteem: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, the aggregate \nnumber of work permits and certificates of exemption, including renewals in respect of \neconomic sectors and skills categories issued by the ministry, is as follows – \n• \nMay to October 2024 – 15,940; \n• \nMay to October 2023 – 14,885; \n• \nMay to October 2022 – 17,898; \n• \nMay to October 2021 – 12,670; \n• \nMay to October 2020 – 5,139; \n• \nMay to October 2019 – 14,111. \nMadam Speaker, a breakdown of this information being quite bulky, is being tabled.  \n\n89 \n \nThe bulk of the migrant workers, more than 80%, relate to the manufacturing sector and \nthe construction sector. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (b), I am informed by the Passport and Immigration \nOffice that there are currently 2,285 migrant workers illegally overstaying in Mauritius \nwhose permits have expired. In addition, there are 2,542 migrant workers who have been \nreported missing. \nMadam Speaker, it is a criminal offence under the Non-Citizens (Employment \nRestriction) Act for a non-citizen to take up employment without a valid work permit, and it \nis equally an offence for a person to employ a non-citizen without a valid work permit. Both \noffences are punishable by a fine between Rs100,000 and Rs500,000 and a term of \nimprisonment not exceeding 5 years. \nMadam Speaker, once a work permit of a non-citizen expires, the employer either has \nto repatriate the worker or has to renew the work permit and pay the claim. Unfortunately, \nmany enterprises fail to do so. This explains the number of migrant workers who are \noverstaying. \nNon-complying companies, Madam Speaker, have been given a delay by my ministry \nto comply with the positions of the Non-Citizens (Employment Restriction) Act or to \nrepatriate the worker. Until they do so, my ministry has decided not to entertain any new \napplications for recruitment of migrant workers from these companies. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! That’s alright!  \nHon. Third Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre d'Or, Mr Etwareea! \nFISHING PERMITS DISTRIBUTION – 2024 GENERAL ELECTIONS EVE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/112",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 112,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/112) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to fishing permits, he will state the number of permits distributed on the eve of the \nrecent General Elections, indicating – \n(a)  the criteria used for the selection process, and  \n(b)  if his Ministry proposes to cancel these permits, indicating the measures, if any, \nenvisaged in cases of abuse. \n\n90",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, hon. Member. I take it for granted that the hon. \nMember is referring to the issuance of artisanal fishermen cards. \nFollowing the issue of a communiqué dated 13 March 2023, inviting potential fishers to \napply for a fisherman card, a walk-in exercise was carried out on 20 and 21 March 2023. \nAccordingly, 709 fishermen cards were issued in the year 2024, out of which 192 were \nissued in July, 416 in September, and 101 in December, in relation to an exercise carried out \nwell before October 2024. \nMadam Speaker, with respect to part (a) of the question, the House may note that \napplicant fishers are eligible for fishers’ cards as per the following criteria – \n1. \nThe applicant fisher shall not be less than 18 years and not more than 50 years old \nat the time of application. \n2. \nThe applicant fisher shall be neither engaged in gainful employment nor be in \nhold of a trade licence or any remunerative licence. \n3. \nThe applicant fisher shall submit a valid Certificate of Character. Any applicant \nfisher involved in or convicted of drug dealing is eliminated upon confirmation \nreceived from the Commissioner of Police. \n4. \nThe applicant fisher shall submit a recommendation letter from the registered \nfishers in whose boat he is fishing. \n5. \nThe applicant fisher shall be medically fit to work at sea as certified by \nGovernment Medical Officer. \n6. \nThe applicant fisher shall pass a swimming assessment which is conducted by the \nNational Coastguard in the presence of Fisheries Protection Officers of the \nMinistry. \nMadam Speaker, once all the above criteria are met, the eligible applicant fisher is \nrequired to successfully complete a general fisher course conducted by the ministry so as to \nqualify for registration as an artisanal fisher. \nWith respect to part (b) of the question, Madam Speaker, in light of the information \ncirculated, the exercise was flawed as basic procedures were not followed. This calls for an \nin-depth enquiry, following which corrective measures will be taken. \n\n91 \n \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, time is now up for Question Time! \nI have been advised that the following PQs have been withdrawn: B/113, B/114, B/117, \nB/119, B/120, B/121, B/123, B/124 and B/127. \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that all the business on today’s \nOrder Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \n᠎PUBLIC BILLS \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the following Bills were read a first time – \n(a)  The Finance and Audit (Amendment) Bill (No. II of 2025) \n(b)  The Bail (Amendment) Bill (No. III of 2025). \n \nMOTION \nGOVERNMENT PROGRAMME 2025-2029 \nOrder read for resuming adjourned debate on the following motion of the Second \nMember for Quartier Militaire & Moka (Dr. Ms B. Thannoo). \n“This Assembly resolves that the Government Programme 2025-2029 presented to this \nAssembly on Friday 24 January 2025, copy of which has been circularised amongst \nHonourable Members, be and is hereby approved.” \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Riviere, the floor \nis yours!  \n(4.13 p.m.) \n\n92 \n \nThe Junior Minister of Youth and Sports (Mrs K. Foo Kune-Bacha): Madame la \nprésidente, c’est avec émotion que je prends la parole aujourd’hui, non pas parce que c’est \nma première intervention de ce mandat, mais après avoir subi, enduré, dictature, censure, \nbullying au sein de cette même Assemblée les cinq dernières années durant, c’est une vraie \njoie et un réel soulagement de pouvoir m’exprimer au sein d’un véritable temple de la \ndémocratie digne de ce nom. Et cela, grâce à vous, Madame la présidente, et à votre adjoint. \nEt c’est toute la population mauricienne qui, aujourd’hui, se sent soulagée, libérée et qui \nrespire à nouveau. \nMadame la présidente, je profite de cette occasion pour exprimer ma profonde gratitude \nenvers les électeurs de la circonscription numéro 20, Beau Bassin/Petite Rivière, qui m’ont \nfait à nouveau confiance. C’est un privilège de pouvoir servir ma circonscription ; c’est un \nprivilège de pouvoir servir le peuple mauricien. Je remercie l’honorable Rajesh Bhagwan, \nfigure emblématique de la circonscription numéro 20, qui a été et qui est plus qu’un colistier \navec un sens du travail d’équipe hors pair, mais pour moi un mentor et une figure paternelle. \nMadame la présidente, après avoir été au service du pays plus de la moitié de ma vie en \ntant qu’athlète de haut niveau, je remercie humblement notre Premier ministre, l’honorable \nDr. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, et notre Premier ministre adjoint, l’honorable Paul Bérenger, \nde m’avoir donné l’opportunité de servir en tant que ministre délégué à la Jeunesse et de \nsport, et d’avoir placé leur confiance en la jeunesse et à la femme pour faire avancer le pays. \nC’est avec intégrité, humilité et ardeur que je me dévouerai au progrès de la nation \nmauricienne. \nMadame la présidente, j’ai aujourd’hui l’honneur de soutenir le programme \ngouvernemental qui met l’emphase sur la reconstruction de la démocratie et de la bonne \ngouvernance, et du développement durable, inclusif et responsable. Madame la présidente, je \nvais consacrer le temps de parole qui me reste à parler de la jeunesse. \nLa jeunesse mauricienne, dynamique et innovatrice, a toujours été le moteur de \ntransformation sociale et économique de notre pays. Les jeunes représentent l’avenir du \npays ; ce sont eux les bâtisseurs de demain, ce sont eux les décideurs de demain. Cependant, \nMadame la présidente, ces 10 dernières années, cette jeunesse a été délaissée et aujourd’hui, \nnos jeunes sont confrontés à des défis sans précédent – un manque de repères, une crise de \nvaleurs, une absence d’opportunité à la hauteur de leurs aspirations. \n\n93 \n \nSous l’ancien régime, les jeunes ont eu le sentiment d’être des victimes, de voir leur \njeunesse dérobée. Sous l’ancien régime, au lieu de bénéficier du développement, les jeunes \nont été confrontés à une augmentation des fléaux comme la drogue et la violence. Sous le ciel \norange, les efforts investis par les jeunes afin d’obtenir une qualification, les sacrifices des \nparents investis dans les études de leurs enfants ne servaient à rien puisque les opportunités \nallaient uniquement à certains privilégiés, et le succès ne dépendait plus du mérite. Des \nsentiments se sont installés ces dernières années ; un pays où les libertés étaient réduites, un \npays qui ne permettait plus à sa jeunesse de rêver. Sous le ciel orange, nos jeunes ont préféré \nquitter le pays pour de meilleures opportunités plus justes ailleurs. Notre gouvernement a la \nvolonté politique et la capacité de changer tout cela, Madame la présidente ; ce programme \ngouvernemental répond précisément à cela.  \nLe programme qui s’intitule ‘A Bridge to the Future’, notre pont vers l’avenir, notre \ngouvernement, ce gouvernement, met l’emphase sur l’avenir tandis que l’ancien régime ne \ns’est jamais soucié du lendemain. Raison pour laquelle, aujourd’hui, nous avons hérité d’un \ntel état de notre économie. Nous, nous sommes soucieux de laisser après notre passage un \nhéritage digne à nos enfants. Ce programme est soucieux de notre jeunesse qui est au cœur \nmême de notre vision pour l’avenir. Nous allons non seulement diversifier notre espace \néconomique, mais aussi créer des moyens pour que nos jeunes puissent s’exprimer et devenir \ndes acteurs véritables de leurs avenirs. \nCe programme marque ainsi une rupture nette entre l’époque où la voix des jeunes était \nmarginalisée. Et l’un des axes majeurs est l’autonomisation des jeunes avec le lancement \nd’un Youth Empowerment Programme, l’organisation de festivals culturels et artistiques \npermettra à nos jeunes de s’exprimer librement et de développer leur créativité. Le \nprogramme inclut des mesures pour faciliter la transition des jeunes vers le marché du travail \nde façon réfléchie grâce au Skills Master Plan qui pourra mettre fin au mismatch entre les \nformations et les besoins économiques. Le programme favorise l’accès à des plateformes \nd’apprentissage numérique, donne les moyens à notre jeunesse de s’engager en leur offrant la \npossibilité de s’impliquer dans des projets écologiques. \nMadame la présidente, l’un des aspects les plus troublants de notre époque est le déclin \ndes valeurs au sein de notre jeunesse. Ce programme offre une réponse claire et ambitieuse à \nce défi en plaçant la famille, l’éducation et le sport au centre de ses priorités, en créant les \nconditions pour que les familles puissent s’épanouir avec des semaines de 40 heures, le congé \n\n94 \n \nparental et le travail flexible après la maternité. Un système éducatif plus inclusif et mieux \nadapté aux besoins des élèves en ramenant davantage de formations sur les compétences \nartistiques et sportives. Ce modèle éducatif à visage humain ; c’est une éducation qui inspire \net prépare à la vie. \nLe sport, Madame la présidente, non seulement améliore la santé de la population, mais \nest aussi vecteur d’inclusion, de cohésion sociale et d’engagement civique. Le sport est un \npuissant outil de prévention contre les fléaux comme la drogue. Le sport représente la \nmeilleure école de la vie. Il enseigne aux jeunes la valeur du travail acharné, la solidarité, le \nrespect, le dépassement de soi, la persévérance, le fair-play, la camaraderie, le sens du \ndevoir ; il enseigne aux jeunes les valeurs et attitudes dont ils ont besoin pour être de bons \ncitoyens. Et l’objectif de notre gouvernement est de mettre le sport au cœur de la vie \nmauricienne. \nMadame la présidente, notre gouvernement apportera le soutien approprié pour que \nchaque jeune soit en mesure de mener une vie saine et satisfaisante, pour que chaque jeune se \nsente outillé pour apporter des changements positifs pour lui-même et pour le pays, pour que \nchaque jeune puisse s’épanouir à son plein potentiel et avoir l’occasion de devenir la \nmeilleure version de lui-même. \nEn conclusion, Madame la présidente, investir dans notre jeunesse, c’est croire dans \nl’avenir de notre nation. Donnons à nos jeunes la possibilité de bâtir une île Maurice avec un \navenir meilleur, plus fort, plus juste et plus durable. \nJe vous remercie.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. You were well within your time. \nYes, hon. Minister, Mr Gondeea! \n(4.22 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Arts and Culture (Mr M. Gondeea): Madam Speaker, as Nelson \nMandela once said – \n“May your choices reflect your hopes, not your fears.” \nToday, I stand before this august Assembly filled with hope for a brighter Mauritius. It is with \nimmense gratitude and humility that I rise to address this House for the first time, committed \n\n95 \n \nto serving our nation with integrity and dedication. Before delving into the core of my \nintervention, allow me to express my profound appreciation. First and foremost, I extend my \ndeepest gratitude to the hon. Prime Minister, Dr. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, whose \nunwavering support has been instrumental in my journey. \nHis trust and resolute leadership have not only shaped our nation’s democratic and \ncultural landscape but have also guided me in assuming this great responsibility. I am equally \ngrateful to the hon. Deputy Prime Minister, hon. Paul Bérenger, for his support and \nconfidence in me. To serve as the Minister of Arts and Culture is both an honour and a \nsolemn duty, one that I embrace with commitment. It is my firm resolve to ensure that our \nartists, cultural workers and the creative industries finally receive the recognition, respect and \nsupport they have long been denied. \nTo my family, my voters and my constituents, your support has been the foundation \nupon which I stand today. I also take a moment to pay tribute to my mentor, the late Dr. \nJames Burty David, a political giant whose wisdom, vision and dedication to the people of \nMauritius have shaped the person I am today. Madam Speaker, I also extend my heartfelt \ncongratulations to you and the hon. Deputy Speaker on your appointment. Your leadership \nmarks a new dawn for our National Assembly: one of free, vibrant and fair debate. Madam \nSpeaker, I cannot stand here today without acknowledging the real architects of this historic \ntransformation – the people of Mauritius. \nOn 10 November 2024, they stood united and made their voices heard. They rejected \nstagnation, broken promises and a government that had been disconnected from their needs. \nThey voted for change; they voted for freedom. They chose a government of action and \nleadership that listens. The overwhelming victory of the Alliance du Changement is not just a \npolitical triumph. It is a victory for democracy, good governance and the collective \naspirations of our people. A UNESCO expert report identified a major flaw obstructing our \ncultural economy – a lack of institutional commitment. In a section titled ‘A Vicious Circle’, \nthe report noted that, and I quote – \n“The vast majority of those we consulted in cultural industries/sectors thought that \nwhatever we wrote in this report would not be implemented or acted upon in any way \nby the Ministry of Arts and Culture.” \nMadam Speaker and hon. Members, allow me to extrapolate. My observation is not just \nabout arts and culture; it is a symptom of a deeper disconnect between the government and \n\n96 \n \nthe people of Mauritius. A disconnect that the electorate sought to eliminate in the last general \nelection. A responsibility this government has vowed to uphold: real change. Sanzman will \nonly be meaningful if we deliver on it. Madam Speaker, the potential of cultural industries for \nSmall Island Developing States (SIDS) was explicitly recognised at the Mauritius \ninternational meeting for SIDS in 2004. Professor Nurse summarised it best when he stated – \n“The cultural sector plays a dual role as an arena for identity formation and an \neconomic sector with growth potential, including its role as a key driver of the new \ndigital and intellectual property economy. It is not just a commercial arena; it is an \nartistic and social space where spiritual values, emotional meaning and bodily pleasures \nare displayed, enacted and represented.” \nMadam Speaker, this summary is two decades old. When the Labour Party left \ngovernment in 2014, major cultural projects were taking shape following these expert reports. \nThe past decade, however, has seen stagnation, if not regression, in the field of arts and \nculture. It is now my ministry’s responsibility to reverse this course with resolve. Cultural \npolicy in Mauritius has historically been viewed as mere expenditure by the government and \nas a welfare subsidy by the public. Another UNESCO report highlighted that funding has \noften been allocated based on ethnic religious considerations rather than strategic cultural \ndevelopment. This has led to fragmented policy making and a lack of urgency in fostering a \ncultural economy. \nMadam Speaker, this Government will change this standard. As outlined in the \nGovernment Programme 2025-2029, we will – \n(i) \nChampion the cultural economy as a pillar of sustainable development. This \nwill require inter-ministerial collaboration beyond Arts and Culture, including \nbusiness, trade, finance, education, tourism and sports; \n(ii) \nConduct an audit of our national heritage and cultural assets. This will evaluate \npublic engagement and infrastructure needs for the cultural economy \ndevelopment, and \n(iii) \nEstablish a national Arts Open Commission. For the first time our creative \nsector will have a structured, transparent and forward-thinking policy aligned \nwith international standards. \nMadam Speaker, tourism is evolving. Travellers now seek deeper cultural immersion \nrather than brief resort experiences. Until now, our tourism model has relied on short cultural \n\n97 \n \nshowcases like a few minutes of Sega. However, a growing segment of visitors desires \nauthentic, immersive experiences, something achievable only with the right infrastructure. By \ninfrastructure, I mean not just heritage sites but also the preservation and transmission of \ncultural traditions, as highlighted by Professor Nurse. While heritage is central to tourism, our \nsites lack the global recognition like those in Europe, China or India. To change this, we need \na holistic approach, one that integrates folk culture, a thriving creative industry and \ncommunity engagement. \nAfter all, we cannot share what we do not fully embrace. My ministry will collaborate \nclosely with the Mauritius Tourism Promotion Authority to give our cultural tourism sector a \nnouveau souffle. This vision also requires a secure, harmonious social environment \ndemanding cross-ministerial cooperation. The previously cited report made a damning \nstatement about our built heritage, and I quote – \n“Mauritius is neglecting its cultural tourism potential and allowing its built heritage to \ndisappear. Port Louis, once among the thousand hemispheres' most magnificent cities, \nmay not retain its heritage for another decade.”  \nIf cultural tourism is to thrive, Port Louis must be seen as the jewel in the crown, not a \ncrime-ridden eyesore. This is a wake-up call. The success of events like the 24/7 festival \norganised in 2009 by the Municipal Council of Port Louis, under my administration as Lord \nMayor, in collaboration with the Human Resources Development Council, proved that \nMauritians have a deep attachment to their capital city. Yet, our public cultural landscape \nremains insufficient, calling for urgent revitalisation to meet the aspirations of our people. \nMadam Speaker, I need not remind the House that more than 20% of our GDP depends \non tourism, a sector that heavily impacts the environment due to its traditional reliance on the \nsea, sand and sun model. Developing cultural tourism can help reduce this pressure on \necosystems. I will seek close collaboration with the Ministry of Environment to ensure a \nsustainable approach.  \nMadam Speaker, museums, theatres and cinemas were once vibrant cultural hubs in our \ncountry. However, the rapid shift in technological infrastructures has significantly contributed \nto their decline, eroding social interactions and diminishing public engagement. Over the past \ndecade, our public-cultural infrastructure has fallen into neglect. Iconic venues like the Serge \nConstantin Theatre remain inaccessible and in dire need of renovation. The inability of the \nprevious government to revitalise the Mauritius Cultural Centre stands as a glaring failure.  \n\n98 \n \nThis Government is resolute in its commitment to restoring and modernising these \nspaces, positioning culture as a central pillar of national development. Our vision is to \nestablish Mauritius as a cultural leader in the region, and we will take decisive steps to \nrekindle our cultural identity. \nMadam Speaker, this is l’Alliance du Changement; this is our vision. It is high time for \nthe arts and culture sector to get back its lettres de noblesse. Pa kouma Rocco ti pe fer avek sa \nminister la kot boku staff ti pe rod sove. \nMadam Speaker, this is not a trivial issue. In a nation historically driven by economic \npragmatism to the point of cynicism, arts and culture have been, for the past ten years, treated \nas an afterthought, viewed as a pleasant but non-essential pursuit. Yet, arts and culture are the \nvery soul of a nation, and nurturing this soul requires a collective commitment. The rise of \ndigital isolation is eroding human connection, even fostering incivility. \nI believe artistic and cultural education is key to a thriving nation. Public spaces that \nencourage cultural engagement are not luxuries; they are necessities. While we have cultural \ninfrastructure, its revitalisation demands strategic funding. We must shift from government \ndependence to self-sustainability, leveraging public-private partnerships. A structured cultural \ncalendar will enhance visibility and accessibility, ensuring the arts become a vital force in our \nsociety. \nMadam Speaker, the audiovisual sector holds immense potential for Mauritius. We \nmust invest in training and education to uplift this industry through close collaboration with \nthe Ministry of Education. Additionally, the Mauritius Film Development Corporation will \nundergo a dynamic restructuration to address two key priorities – \ni. \nenhancing film literacy and exposure for both Mauritian and international \nproductions, and \nii. \nfully unlocking the industry’s potential through targeted training and skills \ndevelopment. \nAs part of the Assises des artistes initiative, we will introduce measures such as master \nclasses, compulsory internships, digitalised training materials and increased representation of \nthe Ministry of Arts and Culture and MFDC within the Economic Development Board. \nThe rich linguistic diversity of our society remains largely untapped in film production. \nScript writing and translation present significant economic opportunities that remain \n\n99 \n \nunderdeveloped. These elements must be integrated into our education system at an early \nstage. The National Arts Open Commission will be tasked with reviewing the existing \nframework and implementing necessary reform to meet industry needs. More broadly, media \nliteracy in education is a pressing concern, and we will work with the national curriculum \nframework to address this gap. A thriving creative industry requires more than talent. It \nrequires education, training and professional development. Unfortunately, the previous \ngovernment neglected capacity-building initiatives, leaving our artists unprepared for global \ncompetition. \nUnder the Government Programme 2025-2029, we will prioritise capacity building by \ndeveloping specialised training programmes in film production, music, digital media, graphic \ndesign and cultural event management. Through international partnership, we will provide \nmentorship opportunities, world-class expertise and a global exchange programme for local \nartists. This programme will foster an investment-driven economy, promote innovation and \ncreativity and establish arts and culture as a genuine pillar of national development. \nMadam Speaker, a key measure in the Government Programme 2025-2029 is the \nexpansion of the Cultural Rebate Scheme to encompass all artistic disciplines and the \ncreation of a directory of musical heritage in the Indian Ocean. These initiatives will not only \nsupport local artists but also position Mauritius as a vibrant cultural destination on the \ninternational stage. Previously, the Rebate Scheme was limited to film production, leaving \nother artistic sectors without adequate support. By broadening the scheme, we will ensure \nthat musicians, theatre producers and visual artists, among others, receive the necessary \nincentives to sustain their careers. This will open avenues for monetisation and professional \ngrowth. \nMadam Speaker, the failures of the past decade are unacceptable. The previous \ngovernment’s policies were poorly designed, ineffective and failed to deliver tangible results. \nThe so-called Status of the Artist Act 2023 was lauded as a landmark reform but ultimately \namounted to nothing more than a failed promise. This will change! Under the Government \nProgramme 2025-2029, we will introduce legislation that aligns with international standards, \nsuch as those established by the United Nations for cultural workers. This will provide \ngenuine recognition, legal protection and financial security to artists, performers, event \norganisers and technical professionals. \n\n100 \n \nMadam Speaker, one of the most pressing concerns for artists today is the inefficiency \nof the Mauritius Society of Authors (MASA). This institution was intended to protect \nintellectual property rights and ensure fair compensation for artists. However, it has failed in \nits mandate, leaving artists underpaid and frustrated. For years, artists have encountered \ndelays in receiving royalties, faced bureaucratic hurdles and suffered from a lack of \ntransparency in fund distribution.  \nThis Government acknowledges that the status quo is unacceptable. We will review \nMASA to ensure it truly serves artists rather than acting as an administrative burden. Strong \nenforcement of intellectual property rights is essential for a thriving, creative industry, and we \nwill not allow insufficiencies to stifle artistic growth. \nTo conclude, this Government Programme is a bridge to the future, a future where arts \nand culture drive economic growth, where artists are valued professionals and where \ncreativity is an engine of progress.  \nThis is the Government of change. This is the Government of progress. Thank you, \nMadam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Members, we will break for 30 minutes for tea! \nAt 4.43 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.21 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Baboolall! You have the floor! \nMr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche and GRSE): Thank you, Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir. It is with profound humility I rise and stand before this august Assembly \ntoday for my maiden speech. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me firstly congratulate you and Madam Speaker for your \nnominations in this 8th National Assembly Session. May I also take this opportunity to \ncongratulate the Prime Minister, Dr. the hon. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, and the Deputy \nPrime Minister, hon. Paul Bérenger, who have both led us to this victory where the country \ncan breathe again, et comme on disait, pour une nouvelle indépendance. Their visionary \nleadership and commitment to the nation’s progress have been instrumental in our collective \nsuccess. Let me also congratulate all the elected Members of Parliament and my two \ncolleagues, Dr. the hon. Ramtohul and hon. Saumtally, for representing the vibrant and \n\n101 \n \ndiverse constituency of Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East, our cherished \nConstituency No. 10. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my journey to this esteemed Chamber has been guided and \nsupported by numerous individuals to whom I am very grateful. I would like to express my \ngratitude to my leader, to my family, to my parents, who instilled in me the values of integrity \nand perseverance; to my wife, whose encouragement has been a constant source of strength; \nand to my children, Karishni and Rishaan, who inspire me to work towards a brighter future \nfor all the children in this country. I also thank all my friends and especially the people in No. \n10 for having believed in me. I also cannot forget my late brother, Barrister Girish Baboolall. \nWe were called to the Bar in England on the same day, and he has always been an inspiring \nsoul, and I know his blessings are with me. I have also lost, during the electoral campaign, \nanother brother, Josué Dardenne, from Trou d’Eau Douce, who has worked tirelessly for the \nAlliance du Changement, and even when he was ill, he came to the Polling Day to vote, and \nthis was his last visit he paid to Trou d’Eau Douce. He will always be missed and \nremembered. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Constituency No. 10 holds a unique place in my heart and our \ncountry’s demography. It is here, in the east, that Mauritius greets the first light of dawn. My \nconstituency is an area of unparalleled natural beauty where we have the Grand River South \nEast Waterfall, Île aux Cerfs and the Thakurbari Temple. This constituency shines as a beacon \nof cultural richness and historical significance. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am proud to have been born and raised in No. 10, home of a \ntapestry of faith and history. From the sacred chants of Maheshwarnath Mandir in Médine to \nthe timeless wisdom of Aroul Migou Kovil in Clemencia; from the holy prayers of Musjid e \nNoorani in Bel Air to the hallowed hymns of St Esprit Church, we are a living testament to \nMauritius pluralism, which keeps reminding us that unity in diversity is our greatest strength. \nI thank you, No. 10, and I will always devote myself to the best of my ability. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the father of the nation, Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam, was \nalso born in No. 10. He went to school in Bel Air, where his teacher, Madam Siris, gave him \nunconditional support. This Government will make sure we have our Mauritian dream again \nfor the generations to come. Unity in diversity should be our motto. \nAs we look ahead, the Government Programme 2025-2029 outlines a bold vision for \nour nation’s future. ‘A Bridge to the Future’ is a blueprint for justice, equity and innovation. \n\n102 \n \nKey reforms are on the horizon, aiming at enhancing economic resilience, promoting \nsustainable development and improving the quality of life of all Mauritians.  \nToday, we stand at the threshold of transformation. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in the next \n25 years, a small island state like our country has to aim to become a global leader in \nsustainable development and innovation, targeting a high value-added services sector \nalongside sustainable development and political stability for our youth to be willing to stay in \nthe country and come back home. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, one of the key pillars of our economy is the tourism sector. \nPreservation of heritage sites as cultural landmarks are engines of sustainable tourism. Our \ntraditional model of the tourism sector is likely to be obsolete in the next 25 years. We need \nto act now with the collaboration of all stakeholders such that we can ensure that this \neconomic pillar innovates and sustains its development. We will need to leverage our \nrelatively better environmental climate to generate returns for our country and our people. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we should also look at education and innovation. Establishing \nwell-classed educational institutions and research centres can foster innovation and attract \ntalent from around the globe. This will drive advancement in various sectors, including \ntechnology, health care and environmental sciences, including the blue economy. Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir, we should not forget that our main resource is our people. We have to invest in \nour people. Nationally, we will need pioneer reforms to combat climate change, empower \nSMEs and build a digital economy. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the recent 60-0 electoral victory is a resounding mandate from \nthe people reflecting their desire for change and progress. This victory belongs to the unity of \nour alliance: to hon. Deputy Prime Minister, Paul Bérenger, whose decades of wisdom and \ncourage have shaped Mauritius’s political conscience – you are our guiding star; to the Prime \nMinister, Dr. the hon. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, the rassembleur, whose ability to unite \ndiverse voices under one banner is unparalleled – you have reignited hope. Together with our \nother esteemed leaders of Rezistans ek Alternativ and Nouveaux Démocrates, they have \nforged a path of inclusivity and shared purpose. The historic 60-0 victory is not merely a \nnumber; it is a roar from the people, a rejection of corruption scandals and moral decay that \nplagued the MSM regime during the last 10 years. The Kistnen murder case, the Silver Bank \nscandal where public funds were plundered, and the MIC's shameless distribution of \ntaxpayers’ money to petit copain-copine; these are stains on our democracy. To sum up the \n\n103 \n \nlast regime, I will say we had a fake Speaker, we had a fake Prime Minister and we had a \nfake government. But, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as stated by the Deputy Prime Minister, hon. \nPaul Bérenger, ‘Lepep admirab knew what had to be done.’ They sent Pinokio and all his \nchatwas in zanana’s Titanic on a one-way farewell trip. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, now we turn the page. Under this Government, accountability \nwill replace impunity. Transparency will replace secrecy. Our Government is committed to \ncharting a different course. We pledge to uphold the highest standards of integrity and \nimplement groundbreaking reforms that will restore faith in our institutions. \nIn conclusion, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I will stand before you deeply aware of the \nresponsibility entrusted to me by the people of Constituency No. 10. As the sun rises each \nmorning in our beloved constituency, let us remind ourselves that we are guided by light and \nthat this Government will honour the people’s trust. Together, we will build a nation where \nintegrity reigns, where every citizen thrives, and where freedom is valued. \nLet Mauritius be Mauritius again, where the Mauritian dream exists! \nLong live l’Alliance du Changement ! Long live the Republic of Mauritius! \nThank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nMay God bless Mauritius! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you, hon. Member! You were within your 10 minutes.  \nNow I call upon hon. Minister Dr. Sukon! You have the floor. \n(5.31 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research (Dr. K. Sukon): Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, I stand in this august Assembly to share my thoughts on the Government \nProgramme. \nFirst of all, let me thank Dr. the hon. Prime Minister, who, in 2012, entrusted me with \nthe establishment of the Open University, and today, he has given me the responsibility of the \nentire higher education sector. I thank him wholeheartedly. But I know that the trust of a \nPrime Minister is not a privilege; it is a responsibility, and I can assure him that I am going to \ndedicate myself to ensure that the sector is taken to greater heights. \n\n104 \n \nI wish to thank the hon. Deputy Prime Minister, my senior colleagues in the Cabinet \nwho are always here to support us, all the MLAs for their support, and for the great victory.  \nWhen I look at the Government Programme, it reminds me of what Nelson Mandela \nhad said – \n“Education is the most powerful weapon you can use to change the world.” \nAnd this Government Programme, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, indeed has the ingredients to \nmake Mauritius Mauritius again. The victory that we had, 60-0, is, as my colleagues have \nsaid, a historic victory. I would like to relate one story. During the campaign, after returning \nhome around 3 a.m., the next morning very early, I got a call – \n« Doc, j’ai bien besoin de vous parler. » \n« Qu’est-ce qu’il y a ? »  \n« Non, j’ai bien besoin de vous parler. » \n« Bien, dis-moi ! »  \n« Non, moustass pou rent dan dilait!» \nSo, I rushed there, and the person who was in front of me, as if he had seen a ghost, I \nasked what happened. He showed me a statistic from Pulse Analytics, stating that in \nConstituency No. 7, MSM is going to obtain 80%, and I started laughing. He looked at me, \nand I said – \n“My friend, I have been teaching statistics for 30 years. I have seen very bad statistics, \nbut this one is fiction. Scam!’’ \nLater, I came to know that this scam has come up with a price tag of Rs45 million; \ncourtesy of the famous, or I must say infamous, MIC, where bad planning meets big money. \nSo, as has been said by Abraham Lincoln – \n“You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, \nbut you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.” \nI think that this victory is a victory for the people, despite the fact that l’Alliance Lepep \nand MSM have been distributing lenses to distort the vision of the people. We have been \nsupporting the people, and the people, and rightly so, decided to change their thoughts in \n\n105 \n \norder to see the truth with clarity. The question that I have often been asked – why join the \nLabour Party? \nI must say that each time the Labour Party has been in government, our education \nsystem has been flourishing because we believe that education is not simply about \naccumulating knowledge but about igniting the curiosity and the creativity in each one of our \nstudents. I, myself, come from a family of five children. My four elder sisters were sent to \nstar schools. I was the little one. Out of pure love, my father said – \n“The little one, he learns; he doesn’t learn; it does not matter. Send him to the primary \nschool of the village.” \nThe school is in my constituency – the Plaine St Cloud RCA School. No star school, \njust a school where I learnt that success is not where you start; it’s how determined you are to \nrise. \nSo, if you look at the history that each time the Labour Party has been there – I take the \nexample of 1970. We had the MIE; despite the financial crunch at that time, it was decided to \nset up the MIE, the MGI.  Even the University of Mauritius was officially inaugurated at that \ntime. In 2012, two universities had been established, the Open University and Université des \nMascareignes. I can tell you that today, Open University – I was there – has the highest \nenrolment and is nearly financially independent. \nThe world today is focusing on inclusive education, but let me remind the House that \nalready in the 70s, we had the Junior Secondary School that provided a balance between \nacademic and technical education. So, I am sure that this government is going to take \neducation to even greater heights. If you look at our tertiary education sector, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir, today, we have around 50,000 students enrolled. 60% of them are enrolled in \nthe public universities, one quarter in private, and the remaining are studying abroad. \nHowever, the gross tertiary enrolment ratio has stagnated at around 49% over the last \ndecade. And what is worrying is that many of our public higher education institutions are in \nfinancial turmoil. True it is that we have 43 institutions registered with the Higher Education \nCommission with around 2,800 foreign students, but to give you one example, one of the \nmain public universities, if I look at the Annual Report ending 30 June 2023, had a deficit of \nRs111 million, making a cumulative deficit of Rs2.1 billion over the last 10 years. This is \nunacceptable; we will have to turn around this situation. And here, I trust the academics, the \n\n106 \n \nnon-academics, the researchers, the regulators and the staff working in this sector to turn \naround the entire situation in the higher education sector. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, when we look at what happened in 2013, Mauritius was the \nfirst country that welcomed an IIT outside India. The IIT Research Academy was established \nin 2013. What happened in 2015? The previous government sent them back. Can you \nimagine?  \nWhat is more dishonest on the part of the previous government and a shameful act is \nthat on 12 September 2013, the hon. Dr. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, inaugurated a plaque at \nBel Air Campus. In 2015, we were told to remove that plaque. Shameful act! Disrespectful, \nbecause you never do that! The Bel Air Campus remained closed for several years. In 2015, \nthey asked the University of Mauritius and Open University to close that. There were \nhundreds of students there; the students had to be displaced.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am not here only to dwell on the past but to talk about our \nplans for the future as stated in the Government Programme. The Government Programme \ntalks about three important aspects.  \nInternationalisation – Internationalisation has been proven to play a pivotal role in \nhelping universities worldwide. When you talk about internationalisation, it takes various \nforms. \nFirst, we are trying to brand higher education. Mauritius is known for the sand and the \nsea; we want Mauritius to be known for its higher education. It is peaceful; that is the first \nthing. Any parent abroad willing to send his child to study will realise that Mauritius is \npeaceful. That is one of our strengths. We have a good standard of living and a good quality \nof education. People do not realise that our academics are right among the best. We have \nacademics who are ranked among the best in the world in their field. Only yesterday, I was at \nthe University of Mauritius where we had professors from abroad working together with our \nacademics. \nIt is well established that enrolling international students is a financially strategic move \nfor universities worldwide. In this context, what we are doing is having a strategic plan for \nthe higher education sector, having a strong brand for higher education in Mauritius and \nholding a higher education summit. To launch the study in Mauritius campaign and websites, \nforge alliances with leading universities and research centres and facilitate accreditation \nprocesses. I must here say previously, if you had a top university coming with the \n\n107 \n \nprogramme, it had to be submitted to HEC, and HEC would ask that university to review the \ncurriculum, which they would not do. Many universities lost such programmes and such \npartnerships because of this. So, we are reviewing the accreditation process. \nWe are also enhancing the quality assurance framework for our courses by forging \nalliances with quality assurance agencies worldwide. We are encouraging higher education \ninstitutions to generate funds. We are asking professors: ‘Please, there is no harm. You are \nteaching at your wand. But we would like you to use your time to start your centre, to \ngenerate revenue, to do consultancy and to bring income to the university.’ We are also \nmaking an appeal to the industry. Unfortunately, no university in the world can afford to have \nthe equipment that is there in the factories/industry. \nTherefore, we are making an appeal to the industry to open the doors so that our \nstudents can go there and learn so that they are eventually ready for the job. We are also \nencouraging our academics to think beyond publication. Very often, our academics are happy; \nthey have done their research, published it in a good journal, and they are happy. We are \nencouraging them to move the horizon, transform it into a business, and turn it into a patent. \nWe are also developing partnership and innovation hubs to link academia and industry both \nhere and abroad and prioritising and supporting research for impact in fields such as climate \nchange, food security, AI, and water resources and management. \nWe are promoting an incubator system so that we have young talents supported in order \nto develop their business and employ and create jobs. The future of education is digital, \ninclusive and lifelong. We are planning to integrate micro-credentials, AI-powered learning \nand flexible e-learning pathways. You would realise that most of our public universities do \nnot have a proper Learning Management System (LMS) and a Student Information \nManagement System. So, we are trying to ensure that they have the proper equipment to be \nable to deliver the programmes. \nWe are also working to expand technical and vocational education and create clear \npathways to higher education. Unlike the previous government, which failed to engage with \neducation leaders on a regular basis, we are taking necessary actions. We are establishing key \nnational committees. First, the National Committee on Research Strategy in order to take \nresearch strategy forward. We are inviting researchers. In fact, we had put a bar on it, \nresearchers with a high H-index, but we have opened it now to welcome researchers who \nhave been publishing in good journals to join in order to take the research strategy forward. \n\n108 \n \nWe have a committee on the internationalisation of high education. It cannot happen \novernight; we are late! Even if we start the branding today, it will not happen overnight. But \nwe have started immediately a committee on internationalisation to look at all the aspects. A \ncommittee to look at the branding and global positioning of our high education sector and a \nnational committee on TVEC advancement. I am also working together with Business \nMauritius in order to set up a National Advisory Committee on curriculum development. We \nhave been talking about the mismatch between demand and supply of labour. We cannot \neliminate that mismatch, but we can reduce it together. So, we will have a national committee \non curriculum development together with people from the industry. \nThe question they have to answer is if tomorrow you have to recruit someone, someone \nwho has followed this course, would you recruit that person, yes or no? If not, how can we \namend the curriculum? We will also have a common internship platform to allow students \nfrom all the universities to apply on that common platform. On this side of the House, I must \nsay that inspired by the hon. Prime Minister and hon. Deputy Prime Minister, we do not want \nto go where the path may lead; we want to go instead where there is no path and leave a trail, \nas said by Emerson. \nSo, to conclude, let me express my deepest gratitude to my two colleagues, hon. Dr. \nPrayag and hon. Me Pentiah, and to all the constituents of my constituency for their support. I \nwould also like to thank my family members, my wife and my sons, and all my supporters, all \nmy friends who keep on providing their support. Together, we can build a future of progress, \nunity and transformation. Finally, to my mom and dad, who had the vision to see me here. \nThank you for your blessings; I am here. \nThank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. I commend the Government Programme to the \nHouse. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister.  \nHon. François, you have 10 minutes! \n(5.51 p.m.) \nMr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues): 13 minutes; 3 minutes from my \ncolleague! Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nLa patience, la résilience, le silence et le discernement sont les maîtres mots que nous \navons pu mesurer lors des élections nationales de 2024. Le choix du changement ici à \n\n109 \n \nMaurice et le choix de la correction à Rodrigues nous incombent une grande responsabilité \ncollective pour le pays et pour son peuple souverain. Batiseur linite nou nation, kreolite nou \nRepiblik, pran to plas! \nM. le président, ceci dit, je vous félicite pour votre élection au poste de Deputy \nSpeaker ainsi que Madam Speaker. Au nom fraternel du peuple de Rodrigues et de l’OPR, je \nfélicite le Premier ministre, le Dr. Ramgoolam ; le Deputy Prime Minister, l’honorable Paul \nBérenger ; le leader de l'opposition, l’honorable Lesjongard ; les leaders, l’honorable Subron \net Duval ; l'Attorney General, l’honorable Glover ; les ministres, Junior Ministers, et \nl’ensemble des élus de cette auguste Assemblée. Je remercie l’honorable Dr. Thannoo pour sa \nmotion de remerciement. \nJe félicite ma colistière, l’honorable Marie Roxana Collet, deuxième femme élue de \nl’OPR après feu Zita Jean Louis en 1987. What can I say? Let us keep the OPR candle \nburning forever and dare not let it fade! Je remercie mon grand leader honorifique Louis \nSerge Clair pour la confiance qu'il a placée en moi en tant que nouveau leader de l’OPR. Je \nremercie toute ma famille pour son soutien inconditionnel. Bon travail par le Commissaire \nélectoral, Monsieur Irfan Raman, et toute son équipe. \nM. le président, dans la confiance, le peuple de Rodrigues m’a élu pour une quatrième \nfois, un quatrième mandat consécutif depuis 2010. J’ai écouté, j’ai entendu, j’ai compris et \nnous avons tiré des leçons. Quelle victoire historique pour l'OPR face à une alliance \ngouvernementale instable. Un fait sans précédent dans l'histoire politique du Rodrigues \nautonome. Merci à la force collective du peuple, dirigeants et militants de l’OPR, en \nparticulier bann madam. Nou inn’ koriz l’Alliance Libération.  \nL’OPR, fidèle à ses principes démocratiques, travaille toujours avec le gouvernement \ncentral du jour dans l’intérêt de la République et de Rodrigues, tout en respectant son \nautonomie, peu importe le parti ou l’alliance politique au pouvoir. Je tiens à remercier \nsincèrement le Premier ministre, Dr. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, et le Premier ministre \nadjoint, Paul Bérenger, pour avoir honoré l'OPR et Rodrigues au sein de ce gouvernement. \nL’OPR souligne les contributions des différents gouvernements nationaux au \ndéveloppement de Rodrigues. Cependant, de nombreux défis demeurent et des \ninvestissements considérables sont indispensables. Mais avec qui à la tête de Rodrigues ? Le \ngouvernement central et Rodrigues autonome, conformément au respect du principe de \n\n110 \n \nsubsidiarité territoriale, doivent inspirer la confiance mutuelle. Le manifeste électoral 2024 de \nl'OPR s'engage à faire avancer la République et l’île Rodrigues autonome, affirmée et \nrespectée, car, il y a urgence de – \n• \nSauver Rodrigues et son autonomie,  \n• \nRedonner espoir au peuple, en particulier à la jeunesse, et  \n• \nRétablir la confiance et la dignité de Rodrigues. \nNous souhaitons orienter Rodrigues vers une autonomie fiscale, énergétique, une \nsouveraineté alimentaire, la modernité et l’innovation. L'OPR propose de grands projets \nnécessitant un engagement ferme du gouvernement central, notamment – \n• \nAméliorer la connectivité avec la construction de l’aéroport de Plaine Corail et la \nmodernisation du port de Port Mathurin. \n• \nLa construction de deux barrages à Fond Anse Baleine et Pavé La Bonté ; un \ndeuxième câble optique, et un projet complet de traitement des eaux usées. \n• \nRenforcer la complémentarité économique entre Rodrigues et Maurice, par \nexemple, en instaurant un marché préférentiel. \n• \nAssurer l'inclusion de Rodrigues dans les principaux projets de développement \nnationaux, notamment, la santé et la lutte contre le changement climatique. \n• \nRéformer la loi sur l'autonomie et le système électoral en adoptant une \nreprésentation proportionnelle améliorée pour garantir la stabilité.  \n• \nPrésenter trois candidats pour Rodrigues aux élections législatives. \n• \nRéduire le coût de la vie et de créer l’égalité. Enn sase lanti a Port-Louis bizin \nmem pri a Port Sud-Est ek Rivière-Coco dan Rodrig, et \n• \nUn « Projet de loi et un Plan spécial d’égalité pour Rodrigues – Horizon 2050 », \nvisant à équilibrer le développement économique et progrès social. \n\n111 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, now, allow me to comment on a few aspects of the \nGovernment Programme that inspire a realistic direction, vision and optimism for our \nRepublic, alongside special attention to the needs and aspirations of Rodrigues.  \nWith the advent of e-politics and e-democracy, I appreciate that the Republic will \ntransition to a people-centric system – e-citizen governance. This could be through a virtuous \ncycle – by eliminating bureaucracy and fully digitalising services. I commend hon. Minister \nDr. Ramtohul’s speech, in spearheading a new AI strategy and identity to transform our \nRepublic across key sectors, based on the principles of e-inclusion and e-democracy. Dr. hon. \nMs Thannoo also highlighted the need for a system change. I will refer them to the insightful \nbook by a Mauritian scholar in Australia, my friend, Dr. Soobhiraj Bungsraz, entitled \n‘Upgrading Political Systems with Purposive Technology: A Performing Democracy – 2024th \nEdition’. The book suggests that purposive assistive technology can enhance political \nsystems, democratising and upgrading them through productive and collaborative \nengagement. The framework leverages technology to create e-democracy and e-politics, \nenhancing the productivity of parliamentarians – we, here, parliamentarians –, the \neffectiveness of parliamentary decision-making, and promoting democratic sustainability. \nIn 2019, we proposed an e-democracy preparedness with an e-politics framework to \nenhance Rodrigues’s political system through a Political Intelligence Application. A \nprototype of the application has already been developed for a pilot test by NDU and the then \nRodrigues-CAB Office, recently closed. \nThe proposed constitutional amendments and nature rights amendments align with our, \nas I said, OPR manifesto 2024, and the visionary proposals made by hon. Joanna Bérenger, \nand myself, during the 2020 Climate Change Bill debate.  \nSince 2022, no major drainage projects have been implemented in Rodrigues, despite \napprovals by LDA and financial clearances obtained. There is urgency to address this issue. \nHon. Dr. Gungapersad, we are looking forward to the Assises de l’éducation, as \nRodrigues seeks an educational reform and model that align, and adapt with our socio-\neconomic realities. \nThe Government should prioritise strengthening Rodrigues' public health services by \nfirst of all, redeveloping Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QEH) existing master plan, providing \n\n112 \n \nessential equipment like a CT-Scan, emphasising cancer prevention, and training for health \npersonnel. I will also urge for a health service and clinical audit for Rodrigues. \nHon. Nagalingum and hon. Mrs Foo Kune-Bacha, our youth, as a driving force of our \nRepublic, should be prioritised and constitutionally institutionalised, for all government \nactions and initiatives in their favour, and also to cultivate a new generation of patriots. \nRodrigues requires the construction of a new police headquarters and a modern \ncourthouse. Mr Sam Lauthan and also, hon. Dr. Gungapersad, this morning, appealed that the \nrise of synthetic drug trafficking must also be urgently addressed by all stakeholders to \nprotect Rodrigues. Kiltir lamor napa so plas dan Rodrig! \nAn hon. Member: Ni à Maurice ! \nMr François: Ni à Maurice ! Très bien ! \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, since 2022, water distribution frequencies in Rodrigues have \nworsened, from at least once a month to twice a year. The way forward is water production to \nsustainably substantially produce at least 10,000 m³ daily, rather than just 3,000 m³. OPR \nprojected a comprehensive potable water production plan through the Rs1 billion from MIC. \nAvant de conclure, permettez-moi d’aborder brièvement la situation socio-politique \nactuelle de Rodrigues – je ne vais pas être long – en lien avec son autonomie et le discours \nprogramme, en me référant aux paragraphes 6, 10 et 39, en matière de confiance, d’éthique, \nde bonne gouvernance, et de l’utilisation judicieuse du budget. Je partage certaines \npréoccupations pour Rodrigues mais, je constate la non-cohérence et des contradictions \ndiamétralement opposées entre certains discours et la réalité des actions locales – une \nmédaille à deux faces. Mon peuple souffre gravement, M. le président. Nous ne pouvons \nrester silencieux, car cela serait complice de cette souffrance. OPR – nou le seki bon e bien \npou Rodrig. Rodrigues va mal. Rodrigues est en déclin : népotisme, désordre, l’instabilité, \nboycottage et chantage politique interne, démantèlements et menaces dans la fonction \npublique, dégradation de l’utilisation de la finance publique, contrairement à l’OPR qui a \nbeaucoup accompli avec des ressources limitées. Un audit complet de la gestion des finances \nest nécessaire. \n\n113 \n \nRodrigues traverse des crises sans précédent : lake partou, pénuries d’eau, carburant, \nalimentation animale, l’insécurité d’emploi, l’injustice sociale – aucune maison sociale \nn’ayant été construite ces trois dernières années.  \nC’est une insulte à l’intelligence du peuple et une haute trahison envers notre \nautonomie, pour laquelle nous avons lutté pour montrer la capacité de Rodrigues. L’OPR dit \nnon à la voyoucratie politique. \nM. le président, messieurs le Premier Ministre et Premier ministre adjoint, en âme et \nconscience, bizin met enn frin. Gouvernman rezional pe krisifie lavenir Rodrig. They have to \ngo! Le peuple de Rodrigues et l’OPR, nous demandons la dissolution de l’Assemblée \nRégionale de Rodrigues le plus vite possible afin de convoquer des élections anticipées pour \nla confiance, la stabilité et la sérénité. Donnons au peuple l’opportunité de corriger ce qui est \ncorrigeable – Correction épisode 2. \nLe gouvernement central a un rôle protecteur pour garantir l’avenir de Rodrigues. \nL’OPR assume sa part de responsabilité et fait appel à toute la population. L’espoir pour \nRodrigues réside dans un grand retour de l’OPR comme voie de la confiance, nécessitant un \nnouveau pacte d’engagement vers un nouvel horizon. \nPour conclure, M. le président, je dis, dans l’unité, rétablissons la confiance, préservons \nnos acquis, renforçons notre autonomie pour une Île Rodrigues autonome, affirmée et \nrespectée. Nou pei, nou pep, nou destin.  \nJe vous remercie. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Merci! Can I call upon the hon. Juman! \n(6.03 p.m.) \nMr E. Juman (First Member for Port Louis Maritime & Port Louis East): Merci, \nM. le président. Je remercie l’honorable Dr. Ms Thannoo pour la motion. Cela me donne \nl’occasion cet après-midi de participer au débat. Je vous félicite pour la présentation et for \nyour maiden speech.  \nJe remercie le Premier ministre de m’avoir témoigné sa confiance et de me donner \nl’occasion de me présenter pour la deuxième fois à la circonscription no 3 comme candidat, et \nje dois vous dire, M. le président, qu'il y avait un certain moment, le PMSD était allié avec \n\n114 \n \nnous. Le PMSD voulait à tout prix avoir un ticket au No. 3, mais le Premier ministre m’a dit \n– \n« Pas de question de te bouger du No.3 et si fale pena l’alliance. » \nEt je dois remercier le Deputy Prime Minister et le ministre Dr. Sukon, le ministre R. \nDuval pour la confiance qu’ils ont placée en moi, me donnant l’occasion de représenter \nl’Alliance du Changement dans ma circonscription. Et je dois dire, M. le président, c’est avec \nbeaucoup de fierté que je m’adresse à la Chambre au nom de la circonscription no 3 et je \npeux vous dire, M. le président, sur dix électeurs qui ont voté aux dernières élections, plus de \nhuit électeurs ont voté pour moi et mes collègues. Vous réalisez que plus de huit électeurs ont \nvoté pour l’Alliance du Changement alors que les représentants du gouvernement sortant \nn’ont pas même eu deux électeurs sur dix qui ont voté pour eux. C’est un vote du changement \nmassif. \nJe dois dire que la responsabilité aussi est énorme sur nos épaules, mais avec le Premier \nministre et le Deputy Prime Minister et tout le monde ensemble, je suis sûre qu’on va s'atteler \nau travail et qu'on va réussir. Mais je dois dire aussi, M. le président, que pendant la \ncampagne électorale, on a beaucoup parlé. Moi, j’ai fait campagne, moi-même j’ai dit, et mes \ncollègues ont souhaité, parce qu’on sentait qu’il y avait un problème dans le pays. Ici, je vous \ndis qu’on a voté pour le changement. Le changement, maintenant, ça se sent, ça se voit. C’est \npalpable. Grâce à vous, M. le président et Madame la présidente, vous avez restauré la \ndémocratie au sein de cette auguste Assemblée. C’est cela le plus important. Le changement, \nça commence ici et c’est visible. Et aussi, je dois dire que, pendant la campagne, j’ai dit \nqu’on allait baisser le prix parce qu’on sentait qu’il y avait un problème. On va baisser le prix \nde l’essence, le prix du diesel, on va faire beaucoup de choses pour alléger, pour soulager la \npopulation. \nMais malheureusement, M. le président, je ne savais pas, nous ne savions pas ce qui \nnous attendait. On croyait vraiment, sincèrement, moi je disais sur tous les médias, meetings, \npartout je disais – on est au bord du précipice. Le pays est au bout du précipice, mais après le \n09, on se retrouve au fond du précipice. Ce n’est pas au bout, c’est au fond du précipice. Non, \nplus au fond du précipice, mais on est recouvert de débris. Maintenant, on doit déblayer les \ndébris. On doit sortir du précipice. On ne savait pas ce qui nous attendait. \nVous réalisez, M. le président, R 5,300 millions investies pour écouter nos \nconversations téléphoniques. Vous réalisez R 5,3 milliards ? Rien pour la maintenance de ces \n\n115 \n \néquipements, R 350 millions par mois ? Est-ce que vous réalisez, M. le président, CWA – on a \nentendu ce matin que, pour un contrat d’un milliard de roupies, on a alloué, on a donné aux \npetits copains de gauche à droite, on a dépensé R 1,8 milliards et qu’aujourd’hui un an après, \non n’arrive même pas à payer les contracteurs. On n’arrive même pas à payer les fournisseurs \nde matériaux à la hauteur de centaines de millions de roupies. \nEt eux, ils posent des questions. Posez des questions sur pipe replacement, sur SME, \ndes centaines, des milliards de roupies dépensées, pas de compte. Voilà où nous en sommes \naujourd’hui ! Cluny, l’exemple vivant R 75 millions. Vous voulez que je continue, M. le \nprésident ?   \nOvertime – aujourd’hui, overtime au ministère de la Santé – voilà le ministre peut nous \nconfirmer – R 1.2 milliards. Des médecins, les personnels hospitaliers qui ont travaillé \npendant la Covid pendant six mois, un an, n’ont pas encore eu leur overtime, leur dû. Voilà ! \nEt we expect them to give us service. Un an, deux ans, trois ans d’overtime dû.  \nNPF, NSF, vous savez il y a quatre mois de cela, ici, on m’a traîné de force, on a \ndemandé à tous les policiers de venir me retirer de cette Chambre ?  On m’a traité – \n“Carry him away! He is dangerous! Too dangerous for this House. Carry him away!”  \nOn m’a humilié! \n“Collect this man!” \nYes, I was dangerous. I was dangerous for the then Prime Minister. I was dangerous for the \nthen Speaker. I told them that they all would be swept away very soon, and today we all know \nwhere they are. Hope they are listening to me. The then Prime Minister had said – \n« Li ti dir li servi larzan lepep kumadir so kas. Li depans kas lepep kuma so kas’. \nM. le président, si c’était son argent, est-ce qu’il aurait loué un bâtiment à la hauteur de \nR 4.6 millions par mois, laissé vide pendant des mois, pendant six, sept, huit mois à Monsieur \nN. G. Si c’était son argent, aurait-il fait ça ? Si c’était son argent, est-ce que la SBM aurait buy \nback loan from SBM pour Maradiva ? Et si c’était son argent, est-ce qu’il aurait donné 1 \nmilliard de roupies de gauche à droite de la MIC ? \nM. le président, il y a 2-3 semaines de cela, j’ai posé une question à l’honorable \nministre, mon collègue, l’honorable Shakeel Mohamed. R 2 milliards dus – des personnes qui \nont loué des terrains à bail avec l’État, pas géométriques –R 2 milliards qui auraient dû être \n\n116 \n \ndans la caisse de l’État aujourd’hui, ne sont pas là. Et de ces 2 milliards, R 900 millions dus \ndepuis plus de deux ans. R 475 millions Pack & Blister, aujourd’hui cinq ans après, on n’a ni \nrespirateur, on n’a ni l’argent. Les respirateurs sont stockés en Italie et on est en train de \npayer des millions de roupies par mois, on est en train de payer des avocats pour des frais \nlégaux en Italie – ni respirateurs ni l’argent. R 300 millions, médicaments périmés, voilà ce \nque le ministre peut nous confirmer après. R 300 millions, médicaments périmés. R 20,2 \nmilliards manipulées sur la dette publique, R 20,2 milliards. Aujourd’hui, la dette publique \nest arrivée à R 608 milliards. Le Premier ministre nous avait promis ‘one trillion economy’, \navec eux c’est one trillion debt. \nVoilà, ça c’est la réalité. Je peux continuer, ça c’est l’argent… \nThe Deputy Speaker: You got only two minutes left! \nMr Juman: Only two! \nM. le président, aujourd’hui, à lekol gourvernman Emmanuel Anquetil à Roche-Bois, \nles factures de téléphone n’ont pas été payées depuis 2015. Il aurait fallu que l’honorable Dr. \nGungapersad vienne au poste pour les payer. Maintenant, les enfants ont accès à l’internet et \nils ont leur téléphone. Vous réalisez que le taux de réussite dans l’école de Roche Bois est à \n15 %. Voilà le crime qu’ils ont commis contre leur peuple. Voilà ! \nOn a un grand chantier, M. le président. Le Premier ministre et le Deputy Prime \nMinister sont en train de travailler. La drogue est en train de ravager notre pays. Il faut \nredonner confiance à nos institutions. C’est ce qu’on fait aujourd’hui. Il faut redonner \nconfiance à nos institutions. Il faut booster la morale de nos fonctionnaires pour rehausser le \nniveau de service au sein de notre fonction publique.  \nPartout, c’est gangrené, M. le président. On a un gros travail à faire. Mais ce n’est pas \nimpossible avec le soutien de tout le monde. Derrière le Premier ministre et le Deputy Prime \nMinister, derrière nous, ce n’est pas un 60-0. J’en profite pour dire merci à mon électorat et \nmerci à la population. Il faut nous faire confiance ; il faut nous soutenir ; il faut être derrière \nnous. On est en train de jeter les bases, pas pour demain, pas pour cinq ans, mais pour les \nprochaines 25-30 ans. Peut-être moi, peut-être beaucoup parmi nous ne serons pas là. Mais ce \nn’est pas cela qui est important. C’est l’avenir de ce pays qui est important.  \nOn est en train de travailler dans cette direction. Que Dieu nous bénisse ! Je suis sûr \nqu’on va réussir. Merci, M. le président !  \n\n117 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you! Hon. David! \n(6.14 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and \nFisheries (Mr F. David) : M. le président, je me joins naturellement à l’élan de félicitations \nqui a entouré votre élection ainsi que celle de la présidente de notre Assemblée nationale.  \nNotre nouvel hémicycle sous votre présidence a retrouvé ses lettres de noblesse après \nque ce temple a été souillé par un régime autocrate soutiré par un arbitre arbitraire, qui, au \nlieu d’être le gardien de ce temple, s’était transformé en gardien de but pour protéger le roi \nsoleil et sa cour !  \nFort heureusement, M. le président, la monarchie est tombée et la démocratie a été \nrestaurée. J’aimerais rappeler à cette Chambre et à celles et ceux qui m’écoutent, comment le \nMonarque a été renversé. Le roi soleil a été détrôné grâce à cette arme : un stylo, une plume ! \n Le 10 novembre dernier, des milliers de Mauriciens se sont rendus dans les 305 centres \nde vote avec leurs propres stylos dans la poche, dans les sacs, parfois autour du cou, au bout \nd’une chaine. Avec ce stylo, ils ont tiré un trait sur le règne MSM. Avec ce stylo, ils ont \ndécidé d’écrire une nouvelle page de notre histoire avec notre Alliance du Changement !  \nJe comprends enfin et mieux aujourd’hui l’expression – The pen is mightier than the \nsword.  \n Avec le soutien de la population, M. le président, nous avons brisé la dictature. BLD. \nNous avons BLD. Et, aujourd’hui, M. le président, alors que je me tiens debout devant vous \ndans cette Assemblée, alors que, pendant les cinq dernières années, avec mes 24 collègues de \nl’opposition de l’époque, nous sommes restés assis. J’étais, pour ma part, assis à la place de \nl’honorable Apollon. Nous étions assis, mais nos idées et nos valeurs étaient debout. Et, \naujourd’hui, M. le président, permettez-moi, en tant que président de l’aile jeune du Parti \ntravailliste, de dire ma joie, de dire ma fierté, de voir 10 membres du Young Labour \naujourd’hui devenus membres du Parlement. \nEt, avec les membres de la jeunesse militante, membres de la jeunesse résistante, \nmembres de la nouvelle jeunesse démocrate, nous mesurons la chance qui est la nôtre \naujourd’hui de cheminer aux côtés des géants de la politique comme le Premier ministre, le \nDr. Ramgoolam, comme le Premier ministre adjoint, l’honorable Bérenger, comme \nl’honorable Bhagwan, comme l’honorable Dr. Boolell. Ces grandes figures de la politique ont \n\n118 \n \nmarqué l’histoire de ce Parlement alors que plusieurs parmi nous, et moi y compris, nous \nétions encore sur les bancs de l’école. Et, aujourd’hui, expérience et jeunesse cheminent \nensemble pour écrire une nouvelle histoire, pour construire un pont vers l’avenir.  A bridge to \nthe future ! Thème de notre programme gouvernemental pour les cinq prochaines années. À \nvrai dire, M. le président, il nous reste 56 mois. \nMais avant de développer rapidement un ou deux points de notre programme, de \ndébattre sur la motion de l’honorable Dr. Mme Thannoo que je félicite, permettez-moi, M. le \nprésident, de saluer et de remercier les électeurs de ma circonscription, la première \ncirconscription du pays, la circonscription Nº1 Port Louis West/Grande Rivière Nord-Ouest, \npour la confiance qu’ils m’ont accordée en faisant de moi pour la deuxième fois consécutive \nleur premier député. \nAvec humilité, je mesure ce que cela représente comme responsabilité. Je sais aussi à \nquel point leurs besoins sont immenses, que leurs attentes sont nombreuses. J’ai envie de leur \ndire à travers la caméra qu’avec mes deux collègues, la ministre Navarre-Marie et le ministre \ndélégué Parapen, nous avons déjà commencé à travailler ensemble pour changer votre \nquotidien, pour changer votre environnement, pour changer votre avenir.  \nM. le président, notre programme gouvernemental, dans son volet ‘A New Economic \nModel’, précise à la page 11 que notre vision inclut ‘Better Exploring and Exploiting the \nPotential of the Ocean Economy’. Et là, je dois vous dire, M. le président, que l’ancien \nrégime MSM s’est noyé dans un océan de néant. Alors que le gouvernement Travailliste avait \ndéjà, en 2013, sous le leadership du Premier ministre de l’époque, Dr. Ramgoolam, qui est à \nnouveau Premier ministre aujourd’hui, et ses alliés, avaient produit après plusieurs \nconcertations, après un travail de fond, en décembre 2013, ce document : The Ocean \nEconomy – A Roadmap for Mauritius. Et, dans ce document, les dirigeants de l’époque \navaient déjà détaillé, présenté les Ocean Economic Clusters, comme la recherche des \nminéraux sous-marins, les projets d’aquaculture innovants, les biotechnologies marines, les \ndeep ocean water applications, ou encore les énergies renouvelables de la mer. \nLe gouvernement MSM aurait très bien pu avoir repris ce document, mettre de l’orange \npartout, mettre du soleil aux quatre coins, s’approprier le projet et faire comme s’il s’était \nintéressé à l’économie bleue, à l’économie de notre océan. Mais, M. le président, même cela, \nils n’ont pas été capables de le faire. Aujourd’hui, après plus de 10 ans de retard accumulé, \nc’est notre gouvernement du Changement qui va développer ce nouveau secteur économique \n\n119 \n \ngrâce à la vision du Premier ministre, avec la détermination du ministre de l’Économie bleue \nen collaboration avec d’autres ministères et sur la base de nouvelles consultations avec toutes \nles parties prenantes : la société civile, les ONG, les partenaires sociaux, le secteur privé, les \nuniversitaires, les scientifiques, les experts internationaux notamment à travers des Assises de \nl’océan qui seront tenues au cours du deuxième trimestre de cette année. \nM. le président, il est impensable, aujourd’hui, de se dire qu’alors que nous sommes \nentourés de 2,2 millions de kilomètres carrés de zone économique exclusive, notre population \nmauricienne n’a toujours pas un accès équitable et durable aux poissons. Un Mauricien, M. le \nprésident, consomme en moyenne 28 kg de poissons à l’année, ce qui fait une consommation \nannuelle pour la population d’environ 30 000 t, et tenez-vous bien, M. le président, sur ces 30 \n000 t, la production locale n’est que de 10 000 t. Nous sommes contraints, alors que nous \navons la mer, un océan, des poissons tout autour de notre pays, d’importer 20 000 t de \npoissons chaque année de la Chine, de l’Indonésie, de la Turquie ou encore du Sri Lanka. \nNous ne produisons qu’un tiers de ce que nous consommons, alors que nos bancs de \npêche à Saya De Malha, Nazareth ou encore Albatross, parmi tant d’autres, regorgent de \nplusieurs milliers de tonnes de poissons non exploités. Aux Seychelles, où je devais me \nrendre la semaine dernière pour la signature d’un accord sur un plan régional de pêche avec \nles autres pays de l’océan Indien jusqu’à ce que Garance en décide autrement, c’est \nprécisément l’inverse. Les Seychelles produisent deux tiers de ce qu’ils consomment. En \nligne, M. le président, avec notre discours programme, nous allons changer cela, notamment \nen démocratisant la pêche semi-industrielle, et en priorité pour les pêcheurs et les opérateurs \nmauriciens. Quant aux bateaux de pêche étrangers qui pêchent dans nos eaux sur une licence \nmauricienne délivrée par notre ministère de la Pêche, nous allons leur imposer qu’ils \ndébarquent tous leurs poissons à Port-Louis, et pas ailleurs. Comme l’a rappelé l’honorable \nministre, le Dr. Boolell, dans son intervention le 7 février dernier, nous prévoyons la \nconstruction d’un véritable port de pêche et la mise en place d’un grand marché aux enchères \ndes produits de la mer. \nM. le président, le temps m’est bientôt compté et je vois le regard pesant… \nThe Deputy Speaker: You are already out of time! \nMr David: …et bienveillant de la Chief Whip, je termine !  \nÀ travers ce méga ministère de la terre et la mer, M. le président, avec l’honorable \nministre, le Dr. Boolell, nous avons la responsabilité des pêcheurs, des planteurs, des \n\n120 \n \néleveurs. Nous nous occupons des fruits de la mer, de la pomme de terre, de l’importation du \nbétail, de la production de miel, du développement de l’industrie cannière, de la lutte contre \nla pêche illégale, du carbone bleu des océans, de l’énergie verte de la biomasse, de la \nconservation des parcs et forêts, de la problématique des chiens errants et du combat contre la \nmaltraitance animale. \nUne dernière phrase ! Un immense changement nous attend, attend le pays. Ce \nchangement longtemps rêvé par notre nation, aujourd’hui incarné par nous, le gouvernement \ndu changement. Soyons donc les catalyseurs de ce changement, les accompagnateurs de cette \ntransition écologique, énergétique et numérique. Soyons les bâtisseurs de ce pont vers \nl’avenir. Un avenir pour réussir, un avenir pour unir et un avenir pour grandir. \nJ’en ai terminé, M. le président. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Dr. the hon. Minister Gungapersad! 20 minutes! \n(6.26 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Education and Human Resource (Dr. M. Gungapersad): Thank \nyou, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir.  \nIn a testament of hope, Martin Luther King Jr. said – \n“You know my friends, there comes a time when people get tired of being trampled \nover by the iron feet of oppression. There comes a time my friends, when people get \ntired of being plunged across the abyss of humiliation, where they experience the \nbleakness of nagging despair.” \nPrior to 10 November 2024, the country was facing the situation of despair. This \ncountry was being trampled over by the iron boot of the MSM government. Whether it was \ninside this Parliament or outside, whether it was in day-to-day life or, whether it was on \nsocial platforms, on Facebook, this MSM government oppressed the population. Then, two \nleaders of this country, they put their heads together, their hearts together, in order to unlock \nthe destiny of this country. I have named the present Prime Minister, Dr. the hon. \nNavinchandra Ramgoolam and the present Deputy Prime Minister – two stalwarts, two great \nleaders of this country. \nFor five years, as a Member of this Assembly, under another Speaker who was a loud \nspeaker. This man, each time we had a session, literally humiliated us. Leave aside young \nParliamentarians and new Parliamentarians like me, but also stalwarts like hon. Paul \n\n121 \n \nRaymond Bérenger and stalwarts like hon. Rajesh Bhagwan and hon. Dr. Arvin Boolell! \nWhat did they not do in this Parliament to communalise this country? Sitting accommodation \nso that on MBC you will see only a few faces – myself thrown at the back purposely, hon. \nRitesh Ramful sent somewhere, hon. Woochit sent somewhere else. Understand what I am \nnot saying. What picture did they want to project to this country? They wanted to demonise \ncertain people. What message were they sending outside to this country? Like this Prime \nMinister, Dr. the hon. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, often says, 'Imagine for one minute—forget \none minute, it is too long, 60 seconds—for one second. If that government were inside this \nParliament today and we were a few again, what would they not have done?' What had they \nnot done to us to break our morale? \nAnd it is important. At this point in time, I read one of the most famous verses of \nRabindranath Tagore to this House. Earlier, I would not have done it that much because there \nwere not enough people in this Parliament during the last mandate so that you could talk \nabout philosophy, literature, and great minds. Who would listen to you? Laptop eklate? Karo \nsab? Karo sebo? Savat dodo? Rocco? Serf? \n(Interruptions) \nYou heard a Prime Minister, the previous Prime Minister – I am not going to name him – \ninculte as compared to the present one, a cultured man, a man who reads, a man who knows \nwhat international diplomacy is, who is constructing a bridge with the world. This is what we \nwant; this is the change we are talking about. You just listened to a few orators ’today. Hon. \nFabrice David, it was 03 February 2020 – that is not a coincidence – you and I, we had our \nmaiden speeches on the same day, and again today, one after the other like two brothers, \ndestiny bringing us again. \nLet me read what Rabindranath Tagore wrote in the 35th stanza of his Nobel-winning \nGitanjali. You know it; the well-versed of this House will know it, but I am reading it for the \nnew generation. I want it to be in the Hansard for the future, and let us meditate on what \nTagore said. Having been the previous rector of Tagore, this is a book I have carried since \nthen, and I do not know how long – \n“Where the mind is without fear and the head is held high; \nWhere knowledge is free; \nWhere the world has not been broken up into fragments by narrow domestic walls; \nWhere words come out from the depth of truth; \n\n122 \n \nWhere tireless striving stretches its arms towards perfection; \nWhere the clear stream of reason has not lost its way into dreary desert sand of dead \nhabit; \nWhere the mind is lead forward by thee into ever-widening thought and action – \nInto that heaven of freedom, my Father, let my country awake.” \nThis is what we want for Mauritius. We do not want a Mauritius which is fragmented, which \nis ‘broken up into fragments by narrow domestic walls’ of communalism. This is what was \nhappening in this country.  \nThe way hon. Ehsan Juman, the way hon. Shakeel Mohamed, the way hon. Patrick \nAssirvaden were treated or ill-treated – I do not know, by that government – when they were \ncoming and unearthing scandals in this House, it took a communal touch. Just like hon. Reza \nUteem would come and talk about figures, they would give that a touch of communalism.  \nWhat didn’t they do to the ladies who were hon. Members of that time? Four days \nbefore International Day of Women which we are going to celebrate, let me congratulate \nMadam Speaker for being a lady who has poise and the way she presides over the affairs of \nthis Assembly. In absentia, if we could applaud that lady for the way she is handling the \naffairs. That said, let me put a comma. What about the lovely ladies, hon. ladies of this \nHouse? Vous êtes la fierté de l’île Maurice. \nMs Anquetil: Merci, Mahend! \nDr. Gungapersad: What hasn’t hon. Stephanie Anquetil bore and endured; hon. Mrs \nNavarre-Marie, hon. Mrs Foo Kune-Bacha and hon. Ms Joanna Bérenger? What didn’t they \ndo to break their morale? I salute you, ladies, because you stood a loud Speaker; you stood \noppression. In spite of being trampled over, you resisted, and you showed the way, and today, \nyou are here. What were they not saying during their speeches – the different Members of \nthat government? They thought that at one point, they were going to be eternally here. \nWe understand our friends are leaving for Iftaar. We wish them all the best and to pray \nfor all of us, for humanity. \nAn hon. Member: Thank you. \n\n123 \n \nDr. Gungapersad: What were they not saying – humiliating, session after session, \nthose who were present, but especially the present Prime Minister. I was named several \ntimes. 13, I have counted. A person like me! I come 7th, I think, in the list after hon. \nBhagwan, hon. Bérenger, hon. Shakeel Mohamed, and hon. Patrick Assirvaden. An unruly, \nuncultured person trying to monitor us. Can you imagine what it is, all the education going to \ndogs, inside this Assembly at one moment? What were they teaching the population outside? \nSomebody today asked me, ‘Why couldn’t you be a bit harsher towards the former Minister \nof Education?’ The culture I come from and the education I have taught me how to respect \nwomen, and I will do that. \nMs Anquetil: Bravo Mahend! \nDr. Gungapersad: Jean Anouilh said something, and it is good for those who are \ninvolved in domestic violence to note it. Jean Anouilh said, il ne faut pas battre une femme – \nmême avec une fleur. I am a disciple of Jean Anouilh. \nHow come this country, this Parliament, when the former Prime Minister, peeping Tom \n– I do not know what type of pleasure he was getting in order to see what the present Prime \nMinister had or did not have. I cannot understand. I was saying, he had placed a radar \nsurveillance camera opposite the house of my good friend, hon. Osman Mahomed, and you \nimagine it with Moustass Leaks. He was trying to peep, to hear; I do not know what was \nhappening in this country. \nFor this, posterity, the future, will recognise these two leaders who stood against the \ntide of time, who stood against all adversities, and who rallied their soldiers, and we said, \nYes, let us get into that journey. I commend hon. Richard Duval; he looked at the interest of \nthe country, and he came forward; the interest of the country came before the family ties. I \ncommend the members of Rezistans ek Alternativ, you had to stand the test of time, and you \nsaid yes to this alliance. And together, experienced ones and young ones, we stood as \ncandidates. \nIn my constituency—the mention was made by hon. Patrick Assirvaden – one Mr \nPrakash Maunthrooa, in Petit Raffray, said, ‘Nou pou détruire le mythe Gungapersad.’ \nHumbly, I am saying it. Humbly, I am standing here. Come on, destroy! You are destroyers; \nwe are builders! On est des bâtisseurs! I said it during the campaign: my two co-candidates, \ncolistiers, everywhere I would have political meetings, I said, I have one dream, and that \n\n124 \n \ndream is to hold in my right hand the hand of hon. Nitish Beejan and on the left, hon. Ram \nEtwareea. Parole donnée, parole sacrée et c’est réussi grâce à la circonscription no. 6. Merci \nà la circonscription no. 6 pour m’avoir élu pour la deuxième fois. Mersi sirkonskription \nnimero 6 pour avoir fait confiance a trwa zanfan sirkonskription, a de zanfan Goodlands e \nenn zanfan Fond du Sac. Merci, l’île Maurice, pour nous avoir fait confiance. When I am \nsaying it, definitely like some of you, I also am missing my father today, my hero figure who \nleft us four days after the elections. \nNow, this MSM thing—c’est important de comprendre son fonctionnement. Et ça n’a \npas terminé. Avez-vous écouté la conférence de presse du présent leader de l’opposition? Je \nne sais pas quel poste il occupe au MSM. Qu’est-ce qu’il dit? Letan margoz inn’ vini. \nPopilasion aksepte manz margoz me pa pou manz fos koze MSM! \nThis is what this population wants. This population, c’est une population aguerrie. Une \npopulation qui a compris ce que ce gouvernement, l’ancien gouvernement MSM, a fait. Can \nyou imagine how many people’s lives have been destroyed? Can you imagine how it \noperates? Can you imagine how it has toyed, how it has played, with institutions? Can you \nimagine how it has sullied the reputation of people? Can you imagine how it has humiliated \ngreat professionals? Hon. Dr. Farhad Aumeer is not here in this Assembly. You come and try \nto attack a professional like him and many others? It is important for this population not to \nforget the multiple wounds inflicted on the soul of Mauritians. \nWhat we now want is a new Mauritius. What we want is a new tryst with destiny, like \nNehru would have said it. What we want is a real change. The best change comes inside our \nheart, whether it is the heart of the MMM, whether it is the heart of the Labour Party, whether \nit is the heart of Nouveaux Démocrates, whether it is the heart of Rezistans ek Alternativ or \nwhether it is the heart of anyone. We want a change. We want humility to be restored in this \ncountry. We want to marry Artificial Intelligence and emotional intelligence. Aristotle rightly \nsaid it – \n“Educating the mind without educating the heart is no education at all!” \nThat government had a Rs1,000 note for every problem of this country. He had \ndifferent Rs1,000 notes to distribute in order to quell any resistance you had against him. \nThey were just spreading; they were sharing money everywhere. The real problems were \nswept under the carpet. Today, each minister, each junior minister, and each MP, when we \nmove the carpet, we realise tonnes of dust have accumulated. Name a ministry where there is \n\n125 \n \nno problem! Name an institution where we don’t have a problem! For ten years, that little, \ndiminutive Prime Minister asked the question kot monn fote ? Kot tonn fote ? History will tell \nyou! I hope he has enough time to sit back and reflect on what harm he has done. \nOne week before the 57th Independence Day, let all of us reaffirm our faith in our \nmotherland and our brotherhood. Let us trample those walls that they had built against \nbrothers of different communities. Let us embrace each other in love! This is what the new \nvision of the educational policies of this government is. We are not only going to feed or to \neducate the brain; we are going to look after the heart also. \nThe children of this country, whether they form part of the elite or whether they are \nslow learners, we want to embrace them as our kids. This is why some people outside are not \nunderstanding it when we came with this philosophy of three credits. We are not saying go \nand get three credits. Some of our kids will not be able to get five or six credits. Some of our \nchildren are not endowed. That is why we were so much against the Extended Programme. \nWe have brought in its place the Foundation Programme. \nAfter three years, these kids are going to get a certificate. Can you imagine how many \nchildren have suffered because of the MSM government? Let me tell the population. Over the \npast three years, 5,927 students have failed the Extended Programme and have left the system \nwithout a PSAC or an NCE Certificate. Congratulations to this government, to the Prime \nMinister, to the Deputy Prime Minister and everyone who has supported this project. \nGive me a few more minutes just to mention the figures. \nThe Deputy Speaker: You are already over… \nDr. Gungapersad: 5,824 students… \nThe Deputy Speaker: One more minute to conclude, please! \nDr. Gungapersad: … did not get the opportunity to get into Lower 6, thanks to that \ngovernment. This year, we have around 2,500 students who are joining Lower 6. This is the \nvision of this government. We have to care for one and all. This government definitely has a \nlot of challenges. We know people outside want results. But a tree does not bear fruit \novernight, especially on land that has been mercilessly destroyed by the toxicity of the MSM \ngovernment. \n\n126 \n \nWe have faith in this population. We have faith in everyone. We say thank you to \neveryone who has supported us. More will join us when they know that we are genuine in our \nmission. \nThank you very much. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Members, we are going to break for one hour. \nThis is what has been arranged.  \nAt 6.48 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 7.52 p.m. with Madam Speaker in Chair.  \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated. I think we have the quorum, we can start.  \nSo, now, hon. Bachoo! \nThe Minister of Health and Wellness (Mr A. Bachoo): Madam Speaker, to start \nwith, let me congratulate you and the Deputy Speaker for having been elected in the House. \nThe late Jugnauth’s government damaged our economy to such an extent that we were \nnearly on the verge of bankruptcy and on the verge of obtaining junk credit rating status. The \nleast mistake we commit will lead us towards the slippery slope of economic chaos. \nMadam Speaker, during the electoral campaign, we were campaigning against the high \ncost of living, we were campaigning against the depreciation of the rupee, and we were \ncampaigning against the purchasing power, which was going down day by day. We were \ncampaigning against the rupee, which was depreciating day by day. From December 2019 \nonwards, the rupee was depreciated by up to 22%, followed by the cumulative inflation rate \nof 33% from December 2019 to September 2024; that was a massive loss in the purchasing \npower of the public. To add to it, the decision of the Bank of Mauritius, at that time, to print \nbillions of rupees also led to the decline of our economic situation. The situation was so bad \nthat today we have to pay for the consequences. \nMadam Speaker, what did we inherit from the previous government? We have inherited \na coffer, which is empty; they have left practically nothing! We have inherited fraud, \ncorruption, nepotism, and at the same time, oppression at all levels – unlawful arrests. They \nwere looking for all those who were against them – even if you are not against them, if you \nare not with them, it means you are against them. Those were the days when people could not \nsleep at rest. I still remember those days; we were out of power, we were in the Opposition, \n\n127 \n \nand we were harassed unnecessarily. There was not a single day that passed that, as former \nmembers of government, we were not harassed. They did not spare anybody, whether they \nwere parliamentarians, trade unionists, lawyers, Facebookers, or even internet users—none \nwere spared! \nTo get the favours of the government, one had to crawl before them. I still remember \nthere were a few ministers at that time; they were having meetings at night, holding meetings \nin Quatre-Bornes, and particularly three of them were hitting at and blackmailing officers, \ncompelling them to make statements against the former ministers, and they were even \nblackmailing service providers. I still remember those difficult days. Madam Speaker, \neverything was not lost, though we knew that was a dangerous moment, a dangerous period. I \nstill remember, again, those turbulent times when you had no right to speak to any other \nperson. You were scared because if they happened to catch you talking to anybody, they \ncould suspect you and make allegations against you. \nThose were the difficult, hard, and dangerous days, but everything was not lost because, \nas we know, there were people who stood against them. A person, no less than the leader of \nour own party, Dr. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, who was not then the Prime Minister, was not \nin the Opposition; he was not even a Member of Parliament, but he stood against \noverwhelming odds. We still remember those difficult days when he had to go to Casernes \ncentrales repeatedly—heaps and heaps of allegations were levelled against him—but still, he \nwas able to stand against those overwhelming odds. We remember that these turbulent times \ngave us, at times, incredible opportunities in order to prove ourselves. In all adversities, there \nis in its depths a treasure of spiritual blessing secretly hidden. He did not run away from his \nresponsibilities; he did not hide in his shell, he did not go underground, and he did not retreat \ninto bunkers, but he came out forcefully, he strove, he sweated, and ultimately, he succeeded. \nToday, he is the Prime Minister of this country, and this is an example that we can all follow. \nThat reminds me of Tagore, he says – \n“Give me the strength to never disown the poor or to bend my [head] before insolent \nmight.” \nAnd, in fact, he did not bend his head before insolent might. \nMadam Speaker, today, we have got two leaders in this House. Both of them have gone \nthrough difficult times and hard times, and today, they are here; they are the trust of the \nnational cause, they are the symbol of the nation, and we are proud to have two such persons \n\n128 \n \nwho are leading this country. Because of this, we are going to prosper, and we are going to do \nvery well in the near future. Though we had difficult times, we had hard times, and I still \nremember those days, those horrible hours, and terrific hours when even I was being \nharassed—my parents, my relatives, my own family, and the way we were being harassed. \nI still remember the day when I was almost dragged to Casernes Centrales, not one, \ntwo, or three, but many times. At times, forcefully, I was compelled to make certain \nstatements in Casernes centrales. I have not yet forgotten that evening, at around 4:50, when \nI was supposed to be put behind in Moka Detention Centre, but I had told them that there is \nno power on earth that can touch me because I had not committed any mistake, and by the \ngrace of God, they could not touch me. \nFour allegations and four charges were levelled against me, but the DPP struck out the \ncase. The then Commissioner of Police appealed against the decision of the DPP to the \nSupreme Court, and the Supreme Court struck out the case. Those were the difficult days, and \nwhen we go down memory lane, at times we shudder when we think about those difficult \nmoments. Madam Speaker, as we say, it is better to be a lion for a day than to become a \nsheep for a whole life. We have a lion among us. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker, it is better to die standing rather than live your whole life on your \nknees. Dr. Navinchandra Ramgoolam has not done that, and for that, he deserves all the \npraises that he merits because he did it; he worked for it – nobody expected it. Whenever you \ntalked to people, in those days, nobody even dreamt that a day would come when the Labour \nParty would be back in power, and today, we are back in power. We have good leaders. \nGood leaders are those who lead the country; bad leaders are those who mislead the \ncountry. Good leaders are those who guide the people; bad leaders are those who misguide \npeople. Good leaders are those who serve the nation; bad leaders are those who make the \nnation serve them and who amass wealth and fatten themselves. This is what they have done, \nand that is why today they are out of power. \nMadam Speaker, 2014 to 2024 was the darkest period of Mauritian history, and \nautomatically, after darkness the dawn follows, and this is what we have seen today. They \nhave looted the country; that is why they have been booted out. These people have used \npolitical power to amass wealth and climb the social ladder, and they have fattened \n\n129 \n \nthemselves; they have built their fortune on the misfortune of the common men. I can say, on \nthis issue, that that is why we say the lesson that we have learnt is that power is poison; it \ncorrupts our conscience, it hardens our heart, and it confounds our understanding. We have to \nexercise power with vigilance. This is a lesson that we have learnt in our life. When we go \nthrough memory lane, we think of the 10 years that have passed; this is a lesson that we have \nlearnt: to never be so arrogant in life because one day you will have to pay for the \nconsequences. \nMadam Speaker, we are free today. The day when we got the elections’ results, \nsomething strange happened. Everybody at that time felt that we were free; they did not get \nanything in return, but they felt the freedom. That is why I am going to quote the same quote \nthat my hon. friend had quoted a few hours ago, about Tagore, and the way he describes in \nwhat atmosphere our country should come up – \n“Where the mind is without fear and the head is held high; \nWhere knowledge is free; \nWhere the world has not been broken up into fragments by narrow domestic walls; \nWhere words come out from the depth of truth; \nWhere tireless striving stretches its arms towards perfection; \nWhere the clear stream of reason has not lost its way into the dreary desert sand of dead \nhabit; \nWhere the mind is led forward by thee into ever-widening thought and action \nInto that Heaven of Freedom, my Father, let my country awake.” \nThis is a prayer to the Lord to let our country awake; where there is freedom, there is no \nrestriction. This is what we have given to the nation, and that is why, today, we are proud that \nwe have got a nation; we have got a country where there is freedom; we can express \nourselves. \nMadam Speaker, we have to say, given that now we are in power, we must have \ncourage and conviction; we must have superb values. We have to be firm in our conviction, \n\n130 \n \nbut we have to be friendly. We have to be tough in our work, but we have to be tender \ntowards those people who are laissés-pour-compte, those who deserve our attention and our \ncare. We have to be courageous, but we have to be compassionate towards our countrymen \nwho are, in fact, passing through difficult economic moments today in our country. We have \npassed through difficult days; we should stop believing in failures. We now have to believe in \nresults. We should forget about prejudice; we should learn lessons from them. We should \nstop talking about problems; we have to look at possibilities about how we are going to help \nour nation. Let us not be a prisoner of the past; let us be an architect of the future. That is \nwhat I believe. \nMadam Speaker, we have got a caring government because, as I said, we have got two \ngood leaders, those who have passed difficult moments. We have learnt, as I say – \n“In all adversities, there is always, in its depths, a treasure of spiritual blessings secretly \nhidden.” \nLet us care for our children. We have to care for our babies, we have to care for our \nyouth, we have to care for our mothers and fathers, our laissés-pour-compte, and those who \nare deprived of the basic necessities of life, and since we have taken over, we have to provide \nthem with a clean environment amidst the dangerous viruses that are spreading everywhere. \nEven amidst difficulties, amidst hardship, we have to provide them with a clean environment. \nMadam Speaker, we are born to serve and to share but not to grab and grieve. That is \nwhy we say we have to help each and every one, everybody who deserves it. Since I have \ntaken over as Minister of Health, I have left no stone unturned to help those who are at the \nlowest strata of society, those who need our care, and those who need our support in health \nmatters. We are not disregarding anybody. We are trying to support each and everybody. The \nlast ten years were the most fateful years in the history of our country, particularly as far as \nthe health problems were concerned, because the legacy that they had left is alarming. \nThe legacy is shocking, horrible, and appalling, to say the least. Madam Speaker, we \nhave got a herculean task to perform. No new doctors were recruited, and no new nurses were \nrecruited. No training was provided to doctors or to our nurses; there was no activity in the \ntraining school. There was no activity, and yet, one of their own kith and kin was chosen to \nsit and to fatten herself in that training centre. Their relatives are there. \n\n131 \n \nWe lack 1500 nurses in our hospitals. Only a handful were taken in the last 10 years. \nToday, the legacy, as I told you, is catastrophic. No money was left. They have spent all. \nThey have dilapidated all money that was in the Ministry. There is no money, not even to pay \nfor petrol. We have no money. We did not have money to pay for foreign hospitals where our \npeople, our patients, were getting treated. And the then Minister of Finance was talking of \neconomic boom, but he was claiming his foolishness to be wisdom. \nWe have practically nothing in the Ministry of Health; they have left the Ministry \nbankrupt. There was nothing, no change. Yes, we do agree – new buildings were constructed. \nYes, foreign funds that were available were mismanaged! Yes, millions of rupees were \nlooted! They had made improper planning; that is true. The new cancer hospital they have \ngiven has no surgery; nothing was done, and equipment is lying idle, and all the consumables \nhave already expired. The ministry, I can say, has the health and medical services in the \nIntensive Care Unit (ICU). \nMadam Speaker, on one hand, the public hospitals are dwindling while the private \nhospitals are flourishing because, as they say, make hay while the sun shines. Those who \nwere close to ‘The Kitchen’ are constructing private hospitals one after the other, whereas our \npublic hospitals have been deliberately disregarded. They have been weakened, and the \nattempt was made to push the public from the public hospitals down to the private sectors. \nThis is what we call the betrayal of trust. \nMadam Speaker, the saga of Molnupiravir and Pack and Blisters is known to \neverybody. Millions of rupees have been wasted. Up to now, we have had to pay Rs575 \nmillion for all our vaccinations. They have not paid. They have done nothing. They have \ndestroyed us; they have finished us. They have looted the wealth, and they have bled the \ncountry white. This is what I can tell you. Madam Speaker, the traumatic and horrible \nexperiences of our elders who had gone for dialysis in those days are known to everybody. \nHow can we forget – they were left to die, confined in a place, and they almost suffocated. I \njust cannot understand in what situation they died. Nobody cared for them. Nothing was \ngiven to them; they were starved to death. Can we forget those traitors for the crimes they \nhave committed? \nThat is what we call murder in broad daylight. Our own kith and kin were murdered by \nthat government. We cannot forget them. Even for years to come, this will keep on haunting \n\n132 \n \nthem because these people were killed deliberately, I can say, because when you go through \nthe reports, you find how those patients were helpless. One could not see with his eyes; \nanother one was crippled, but still he was left in a corner to die. Nobody cared for them. That \nis why I say that they will be punished. They can never come back. \nMadam Speaker, if you look at the health indicators, the Health Statistics Report of \n2023, the average life expectancy for males and females in 2015 was 74.5 years, and in 2023 \nit has gone down to 73.5. This means we are going to die earlier. \nSecondly, HIV/AIDS should be zero by 2030. Unfortunately, it is increasing. In 2014, \nit was 333; in 2023, it was 405. Our target always was for HIV/AIDS to be completely \neliminated by 2030. Unfortunately, it is rising. The death rate due to non-communicable \ndiseases has gone up by 20%. It is a shame for our country. In 2014, it was 6809; in 2023, it \nwas 8129. This could have been avoided. They have practically done nothing. Money was \nvoted on, but money was looted. They have robbed us; they have finished the country. \nMadam Speaker, it is not mere statistics. This is the naked truth of mismanagement, the \nfailure of our system, and the result of neglect, corruption, and nepotism. Madam Speaker, \nthe health workers in our country need our support. They are our assets. Do you know how \nmany cases of assault have been noted? But one thing I can assure you on behalf of the \nGovernment – I say we have to be pitiless against those rascals who were hurting our health \nworkers. We have to be without pity because two days back, there were two cases where our \nnursing officers and doctors were assaulted. I think this has to stop, and we have to see to it \nthat this does not happen again. When it comes to overtime, they have not been paid. Up till \nnow, we owe Rs500 million. We are not at fault. I do not know how they have managed. \nHow is it possible to pay for almost Rs2 billion in overtime? Now, we are left with Rs500 \nmillion, but we have to give a guarantee to our workers that we are going to pay them all the \novertime, and we have to recruit trained officers in the Ministry of Health. The school of \nnursing has to be active over again. We have to have transparency and accountability \neverywhere. \nOur focus, Madam Speaker, is on prevention, prevention, and prevention. We have \nstarted a nationwide campaign in order to improve the health of our public. For example, \nnon-communicable diseases, communicable diseases, HIV/AIDS, and substance abuse. Here, \nI have to thank the hon. Deputy Prime Minister for the support that he is extending to us. \n\n133 \n \nMadam Speaker, the Moka Eye Hospital is already saturated. Every day you have about 400 \nto 500 people queuing up. That is the reason why we have started decentralising. Now in \nFlacq Hospital, we have started one wing, and we are carrying out about 300 eye cataract \noperations monthly. We have a similar case in Souillac Hospital. We are going to move \ntowards Jeetoo Hospital as well. We are going to decentralise so that there will not be any \nneed for our people, our patients, to travel, and they will not have to queue up the whole day. \nThis has to stop because we are now in a modern country. We have to provide them with all \namenities. \nMadam Speaker, the mental department is completely neglected. Nobody cared for the \nBrown Sequard hospital, and it is a shame for me to say in the House that we have got a \nreport that many of the wards are full of punaises (bedbugs), and we have to remove all those \nbeds now. We have to provide them with better conditions and new beds. Proper resources \nwill be put in, and we are going to start a new emergency service, similar to SAMU, but here, \nit will be manned by the psychiatrist. This is what we have promised because we have to help \nthose desperate people. Madam Speaker, we have to give a fresh look to overseas treatment \nto prevent abuse, and to ensure sustainability, strict criteria have to be imposed. \nAs far as the cancer hospital is concerned, it is already operational. The DEXA scan \nand PET scan will be operational in about two months’ or three months’ time because certain \ncomponents have already been ordered from abroad. We are getting the support of \noncological experts from India. We have to thank the Indian authorities for having provided \nus with all types of support, particularly a few hospitals of Chennai. They have also decided \nto provide space for our patients to stay in Chennai because, previously, parents who were \naccompanying the patients were having difficulties. I have to thank my friend, hon. Rajen \nNarsinghen, for the support that he has given me. Through him and through our \nrepresentative in Chennai, we were able to make certain arrangements. \nMadam Speaker, diabetes is devastating our nation. The Prime Minister, himself, is \npersonally concerned, and he contacted Professor David Owens, a renowned professor in \ndiabetology, to enlist his support. I hope that we are going to get his support. We have \nalready started diabetes centres in all our hospitals. Yesterday, I met Professor Rajesh \nKesavan, an expert in diabetic foot from Chennai. We have also retained his services, and he \nhas accepted to come and to give us free support. \n\n134 \n \nMadam Speaker, as far as cardiovascular disease is concerned, our Prime Minister has \nestablished contact with Professor Derek Yellon and Professor Malcolm Walker from \nUniversity College London. An international conference will be held towards the end of this \nyear on diabetes, renal diseases, and cardiovascular diseases. This will be held around \nOctober this year. \nI am also pleased to announce that we have also set up a Renal Transplant Unit at \nJawaharlal Nehru Hospital. For the time being, it is at Victoria Hospital. We have recruited \nan international expert to set up the unit and to train our staff and also to conduct the renal \ntransplant. \nIn our Government Programme, we have to set up a hospital specialised in obstetrics \nand gynaecology and one in paediatrics. The Public Health Act dates back to 1925; it has to \nbe reviewed. The Pharmaceutical Board, Pharmaceutical Council, Medical Board, Dental \nCouncil, Mauritius Institute of Health, and Trust Fund for Specialised Medical Care—all \nthese will be relooked, and we have to give a new look and reform them. \nIn conclusion, I would like to remind the House of a stark failure that symbolises 10 \nyears of stagnation, that is, the e-project – computerisation. I remember earlier in 2014, under \nthe Labour Government, we secured the support of the Government of India through the \nintervention of our Prime Minister. They would have helped us in setting up the e-project. \nUnfortunately, when we were out of power, the new government that came rejected the \nproposal of the Government of India, and they have left everything as it was. There is a \nsaying that goes, ‘They slept beneath the moon; they bathed beneath the sun; they led a life of \ngoing to do, and they died politically without doing any.’ This is what they have done. They \npromised; they have not done it. I can assure the House that we are going very fast with it. \nIn conclusion, I have to quote our Father of the Nation. I cannot end without quoting \nhim because whenever I deliver speeches, I have the habit of quoting him. Before 1982, I \nremember his words, and I am going to quote them as a conclusion. He said— \n“The Labour Party is not a perfect political party. The Labour Party may not be a \nperfect political party. For that matter, no party is perfect. Yet, we have practiced the \nvirtues of tolerance and patience, of understanding those who are against us, of \nreverence for life, of compassion for the sick and needy, and of concern for our youth. \nWe have protected the weak and humbled the pride of enemies of people. We have paid \n\n135 \n \nour dues. We have honoured our obligations. We have exerted ourselves for the welfare \nof our country. We have imparted momentum to economic activities and social \nprogrammes. That is why Mauritius is held in high regard as a stronghold of democracy \nin a world where unemployment is endemic, famine is rampant, and misery is \nwidespread.” \n“Let us make our lives sublime. And, departing, leave behind us footprints in the sands \nof time.” \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much. Hon. Minister Gunness! Try to keep an eye \non the time! \n(8.17 p.m.) \nThe Minister of National Infrastructure (Mr G. Gunness): Yes, sure! That’s why I \nput my watch here. \nMadam Speaker, allow me, first of all, to congratulate you on your election as Speaker \nof the House as well as my good friend, hon. Baloomoody, as Deputy Speaker, and to all hon. \nMembers who are here, who have been elected in their respective constituencies, to the Prime \nMinister, and to the Deputy Prime Minister. So, we are here, l’Alliance du Changement, with \na 60-0. \nWe must reflect on what happened to our country. Why did we make this alliance? \nBefore the elections, we must remember the last five years that the MSM government was in \npower. It is good to remember that they were in power with only 37% of the suffrage. Only \n37%, which means the majority of the people were against them. Despite that, what did we \nsee? Arrogance! L'arrogance du pouvoir était là. When we saw the former Prime Minister \nanswering questions, it was as if we were disturbing him if we asked him a question. He \nwould take a whole 30 minutes to give you an answer with all the arrogance that you can \nimagine. We know how they were dealing with the affairs of the country. \nIt is true when they were saying – some of their chatwas and some who left our party – \nthat the MMM has been in Opposition; the MMM is a party for Opposition. Yes, true it is! \nWe have been in Opposition for a long time. I am here, myself, for my fourth mandate after \n\n136 \n \n14 years out of this Parliament. I still remember; I was there for my first mandate. I am proud \nthat for my first mandate, I was here with the same alliance – the Labour Party and the MMM \nin 1995. I was sitting there next to my brother, the late Zeel Peerun. We were two brothers. I \nwas in this House and I had three mandates. After 14 years, I am back here. But what is more \nimportant is that, be it in Opposition or in Government, the MMM has not deviated from its \nprinciples and ideals. Our principles and ideals have remained the same, which is, first of all, \nthe consolidation of the national unity. This is one of our principles, which we cherish, and \nwe will never let anybody put in danger the unity of this population. \nThe previous regime, the MSM government—what didn’t we hear with Missie \nMoustass? It was even as if the National Anthem was reserved for them! Such a community \ncannot sing the National Anthem! They have tried to divide the population into segments, and \nthey have paid for this crime because this population lives like brothers and sisters from \ndifferent communities. See the beauty of Mauritius: we just celebrated Cavadee, we had \nMaha Shivratri, we are now having Ramadan, and we will be having the Christian fasting. \nThis is the beauty of Mauritius! These people have tried to put this in danger. We can get into \nany problem, the biggest problem that we can have, but if we have national unity in the \ncountry, we will get out of any problem. We can face any type of problem if we have national \nunity in this country. \nThis is one of the principles that, in the MMM, we were born for—to consolidate our \nnational unity. Our principle for consolidation of democracy. Every time we have been in \npower, we did everything to consolidate our democracy. Just recently, with what they tried to \ndo with DPP, we restored the power of the DPP. This is what we do with the 60-0. We will \nbring back municipal elections soon. We will put it in the Constitution, not like what they \nwere doing with the majority that they had – trying to take all the powers of the DPP and \nbring the Prosecution Commission, and when they failed, by the back door when introducing \nthe FCC Act, trying to curtail the powers of the DPP. This is what they did with their \nmajority. \nBut here, we are in a government with a 60-0 majority. The population can rest assured \nthat on each occasion the Labour Party and the MMM are two parties with their allies, and \nwith the Rezistans ek Alternativ and Nouveaux Démocrates, we are parties who have been \nborn to consolidate democracy. We have been born for the wellbeing of the population, for a \nbetter distribution of wealth in the country, and to manage the economic affairs of the country \n\n137 \n \nwith all the rigidity andall the seriousness that a country deserves in the management of its \neconomic affairs. We are here to bring a balance between development, nature, and the \nenvironment. This is what we are here for, not like the MSM government was. \nMadam Speaker, I think that this alliance is a God-sent alliance because if we imagine \nfor one minute that they had come into power, the MSM regime, what would have been the \nfate of this country today? We know how they managed the economy. They destroyed the \neconomy so much so that today we are on the watch list of Moody’s. We know now how they \ndilapidated all the funds; the MIC, what they did with the Rs80 billion, how they gave to petit \ncopain, petite copine – we know what they did with our economy. Fraud and corruption were \nas if à la mode. ICAC was a whitewashing machine in the hand of the MSM government. We \nknow when Sobrinho was coming in the country; get lizie dan lizie. This was in Mauritius, \nget lizie dan lizie Sobrinho… \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Lizie dan lizie me lame dan pos! \nMr Gunness: Lame dan pos! We know what happened in the case of MedPoint. How \nthe Director of ICAC, Dr. Beekarry, went to London… \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Pa zoure! \nMr Gunness: No, Beekarry pa zoure sa! Beekarry ve dir mizerab!  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: 600 mil so lapay! \nMr Gunness: Ein! Salary: Rs600,000. Went to London—turncoat! Madam Speaker, \nthe population, up to now, does not know how the evaluation of that MedPoint from Rs77 m. \ncame to Rs144 m. This the population does not know. He could have a turncoat there, but I \nam sure that in the near future, the population will know. Angus Road, how money was paid \nby cash, and receipts we have seen in the papers. Money coming from London for which \nICAC did not see anything. Stag Party, ICAC did not see anything. This was how ICAC was \ndealing because they were under the supervision of Lakwizin. They were taking orders from \nLakwizin and it was Lakwizin – kitchen-Cabinet – which was managing the affairs of the \ncountry. How can a country where you get people democratically elected but they were \ntaking directives from a kitchen-Cabinet? This was Mauritius under the MSM regime. It is \ngood that the population of this country – I always say, hon. Paul Bérenger, Deputy Prime \nMinister, was right in 1982 when he said lepep moris ce enn pep admirab – and really, this \ncountry has a pep admirab. They know what to do. They will not go on the street. They wait \n\n138 \n \nfor their time. I have never seen in an election, early in the morning, people queuing up with \ntheir pen in their hand. At 6 o’clock, – when I started for 7 o’clock – people were already \nqueuing up, and at that time I knew that les carottes sont cuites pour le MSM because people \nwere with their pen. These are the two messages that we sent to the people during the \ncampaign: you go and vote early, or else they will send people to vote in your place, and take \nyour pen because we do not trust them. People went early and went with their pen and did \nwhat they had to do at that time, and this is the lepep admirab de l’île Maurice, and I am \nproud as a Mauritian that our citizens have done what had to be done for this country, Madam \nSpeaker. \nMadam Speaker, I come to another topic, which is flash floods. We know that we \ncannot predict flash floods. Since I took office, I have had several meetings with the technical \nstaff of my ministry and carried out numerous site visits because we are very much \nconcerned, as a small country, with flash floods, and we know what happened in our country. \nI must say that I have been very much surprised at the extent of works that have not yet been \ncompleted or even started. Since 2019, that is, six years now, projects qualified under \nemergency and budgeted for an amount of Rs11.7 billion were not implemented despite these \nprojects being considered emergency projects. 62 projects listed as priority by the Land \nDrainage Authority are incomplete or even yet to be started – either they do not have \ndrawings or there is no wayleave, that is, no follow-up has been done to see that the drains \nare put in place. \nMadam Speaker, we already know the distress that many people faced during the \nflooding of 2023 and 2024. We saw many vehicles being carried away and heavy damage \ncaused to infrastructure, particularly in Port Louis and Vallée des Prêtres. Any reasonable \ngovernment would have immediately implemented mitigating measures to prevent the \nrecurrence of such events. Sad to say that this never materialises in reality. For Port Louis, \neight projects were listed as top priority to mitigate the impact of flooding from Ruisseau du \nPouce and inside Port Louis, La Poudrière, and the other streets. \nRs1.9 billion project value funds were earmarked for supposedly emergency projects; \nnone of these have been implemented to date. And, yet, you remember what their motto was \nat that time; they said, ‘putting people first.’ \nI am sure you can bet who they were putting first. \nAn hon. Member: Maitresse!  \n\n139 \n \nMr Gunness: In the same line, Madam Speaker, the Drain Infrastructure Construction \nLtd. was set up. This company was supposed to act faster than other implementing agencies \nlike RDA, NDU, and local authorities. It was created with an envelope of Rs12 billion. We \nall know who was chairing the DICL. Projects exceeding cost estimates for which financial \nclearance was not obtained were being awarded, and today, the DICL is sitting on claims \nworth millions of rupees to consultants and contractors. \nMadam Speaker, with a view to ensuring that drainage systems are robust, regularly \ncleaned, and properly managed to minimise the damage caused by flash floods and protect \nboth lives and property, the Land Drainage Authority has been mandated to spearhead the \nNational Flood Management Programme. The Cabinet has just set up a technical committee \nto review the Land Drainage Masterplan, and a report is expected in the shortest delay \npossible. \nMadam Speaker, this government has not forgotten Rodrigues. Some 11 drain projects \nare being considered for implementation in Rodrigues. Four projects are at the level of the \nCentral Procurement Board for selection of contractors. A Land Drainage Masterplan for \nRodrigues will be commissioned by the LDA; this will serve as a basis for attenuating the \nimpact of flooding and achieving an integrated management of flood risk to reduce the \nvulnerability of the population to heavy rainfall. \nMadam Speaker, the availability of these infrastructures ensures that communities \nthrive, businesses operate efficiently, and citizens enjoy a better quality of life. In essence, the \ndevelopment and upkeep of roads, drains, and amenities are integral to a country’s growth, \nstability, and prosperity. \nMadam Speaker, over the recent years, the government of India has financed several \nprojects under the G2G Agreement. These projects, including the New Flacq Hospital, the \nNew Cancer Hospital, and ENT, are of great significance to the people of Mauritius, for \nwhich we are deeply grateful to the Government of India. \nHowever, I have been informed that the previous government did not involve my \nministry at any stage of the project. My ministry is now called upon to provide technical \nsupport because we have to provide the technical support for these assets that the \nGovernment of India has offered us, but we have no plan, no design, and nothing because the \nMinistry of National Infrastructure was not involved in any stage of the project under the \nprevious government. \n\n140 \n \nNow, we are trying several mitigating strategies at the level of my ministry so that we \ncan follow up. We are trying to conduct a comprehensive building audit for all buildings \nconstructed within the last two years under the G2G Agreement. We are developing a \nbuilding maintenance manual, including updated layouts and system details. We are \nimplementing a Preventive Maintenance Programme in close collaboration with the project \nconsultants. \nAs far as the construction sector, my Ministry will support and empower SMEs by \nimplementing targeted measures to enhance their capabilities and ensure their sustainable \ngrowth. We will facilitate access to public contracts for SMEs in the construction sector, \nensuring that they have fair opportunities to participate in government projects. Additional \nsupport will be given to help small contractors invest in modern equipment and innovative \nconstruction technology. \nOne of the critical challenges facing our economy, particularly in the construction \nsector, is the skill mismatch and labour shortages. To bridge this gap in the construction \nsector, my ministry and the Construction Industry Authority will work closely with training \ninstitutions, technical colleges, and industry stakeholders to develop tailor-made programme \nthat will equip individuals with the skills required in the construction sector. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to the Road Development Authority, I must point out that \nsince its inception, the RDA has been committed to improving mobility and guiding transport \ninvestment in the Republic of Mauritius. My mission is to create a sustainable, resilient, and \nefficient road network that supports the socio-economic growth of our nation. However, as \nwe face an increasingly unpredictable environment, we must adopt a new dynamic and \nholistic approach to transport planning. I have noted that up to now, we have spent Rs342.8 \nmillion, excluding the cost of land, on constructing cycle lanes, which, unfortunately, are not \nused and are left in an abandoned state. I consider it to be a waste of public funds. No \nsensitisation campaign has been carried out, and a blanket policy decision was taken by the \nprevious government to build bicycle lanes on all new roads. \nMadam Speaker, l’Alliance du Changement promises to do things differently. We will \nensure that money is spent where it is most deserved. We are completely reviewing the policy \nfor provision of cycle lanes to ensure that public money is spent diligently and the Mauritian \npublic are able to benefit from these infrastructures.  In fact, we will look into several \npossibilities in collaboration with the Traffic Management and Road Safety and the police. \n\n141 \n \nSome proposals being looked include the extension of existing cycle lanes to connect the \nneighbouring villages and towns to promote more ridership. \nFurthermore, taking into consideration the rising number of accidents involving \nmotorcycles, there is a growing consensus that the traffic flow of two-wheelers should be \nsegregated from other vehicular traffic in a bid to reduce risk of collision and accidents. \nDedicated lanes will be considered for two-wheelers wherever possible. As a real caring \ngovernment, we will leave no stone unturned in this endeavour.  \nMadam Speaker, I will go directly to the conclusion. Madam Speaker, the future is an \never-shifting landscape, full of both uncertainties and opportunities. Every day we are \nconfronted with new challenges and decisions that shape the path ahead. As we build the \nbridge to the future, we must remember that it will take time. It will require patience, \nperseverance and resilience. We, citizens of Mauritius, are the architects of this bridge and it \nis our responsibility to ensure that it is well built, inclusive and forward-thinking. Madam \nSpeaker, when historians will write of this era, let them say this –  \n‘When Mauritius faced its darkest hours, its people chose light. They chose justice, \nthey chose to believe once more in democracy, in a new government – the l’Alliance \ndu Changement.’  \nOur pledge must be that no child will grow in fear, no grandmother will whisper secrets \nglancing at the walls, no citizen will doubt that their voice matters. \nMadam Speaker, the future is not a distant dream; it is something we shape. Together \nwe can lay the first stone of that bridge today and continue to build it for generations to come. \nThe future is for us to shape. The bridge to the future is for us to create and it begins now. We \nare Mauritians, we are resilient, we are free. Thank you, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. I realise that you all have more interesting things to say, \nbut you will get other occasions to speak.  \nHon. Minister Duval! \n(8.43 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Tourism (Mr R. Duval): Thank you, Madam Speaker.  \nMadame la présidente, permettez-moi d’exprimer l’honneur qui est le mien de prendre \nla parole pour la première fois en tant que ministre et de surcroît à la tête du ministère qui fut, \nautrefois, confié à mon père, Sir Gaëtan Duval.  \n\n142 \n \nCet honneur est d’autant plus grand, Madame la présidente, que je me tiens aujourd’hui \ndevant vous dans une Chambre qui a retrouvé sa sérénité. Ayant siégé dans cette auguste \nAssemblée de 2019 à 2024, je peux vous assurer qu’il n’y a aucune comparaison, alors là \naucune comparaison, avec le calvaire que nous subissions lorsque nous étions dans \nl’opposition. \nLa démocratie, fort heureusement, après tant d’injustices, de grossièretés sous le régime \nJugnauth, a été réinstaurée. Madame la présidente, je voudrais d’abord féliciter l’honorable \nDr. Mme Thannoo pour sa motion. Je saisis l’occasion pour vous féliciter pour votre élection \ncomme présidente de cette Chambre, ainsi que votre adjoint, l’honorable Veda Baloomoody. \nJe tiens également à saluer et à féliciter tous mes collègues élus, mes camarades de \ncette équipe gouvernementale. Une équipe dirigée par l’honorable Dr. Navinchandra \nRamgoolam qui, en bon général, a su rassembler des gens de bonne volonté et galvaniser ses \ntroupes pour les mener vers une écrasante victoire au côté de l’infatigable leader du MMM, \nl’honorable Paul Bérenger. \nJe n’oublie pas mes amis évidemment de Rezistans ek Alternativ, notamment mon ami, \nl’honorable Ashok Subron. Mes deux camarades de Nouveaux Démocrates, l’honorable \nKushal Lobine et l’honorable Véronique Leu-Govind. Je tiens à dire un grand merci enfin \naux habitants de Curepipe/Midlands qui m’ont fait confiance ainsi que mes deux colistiers, \nl’honorable Michaël Yeung Sik Yuen et mon ami, l’honorable Ajay Gunness. Je rappelle que \nla circonscription numéro 17 est la seule à avoir trois ministres. Enn ti pe vantar ! \nMadame la présidente, nous avons assisté le 10 novembre dernier à une révolution \npacifique et démocratique. Aucune effusion de sang, aucun affrontement, cette révolution \ns’est faite avec un simple stylo ! La victoire de 60-0 a entraîné dans son sillage un sentiment \nde liberté, voire une confiance retrouvée au sein de notre population. Mais les chantiers \ndevant nous restent immenses.  \nMadame la présidente, je veux simplement souligner qu’on n’a jamais été autant en \nsymbiose avec les vœux et les aspirations de notre peuple. Notre gouvernement n’a pas choisi \nla facilité ; nous avons choisi de faire les choses en respectant la loi.  \nPermettez-moi maintenant de parler de mon ministère dont j’ai la responsabilité. Le \ntourisme, Madame la présidente, est un pilier essentiel de notre économie. Sa contribution \ndirecte et indirecte tournerait, selon les estimations, autour de 21 à 24 % de notre produit \n\n143 \n \nintérieur brut. Il faut savoir qu’un emploi sur 10 est directement ou indirectement lié au \ntourisme. \nMadame la présidente, comment se porte le secteur ? Si l’on croit à certains chiffres, \nplutôt bien, mais cela, d’après moi, aurait pu être beaucoup mieux en termes d’arrivée. Je \npeux dire que nous ne sommes qu’à 97 à 98 % du niveau de 2019. Mais l’ancien \ngouvernement se targuait de pouvoir retrouver, voire dépasser, ce seuil en avançant les \nchiffres de 1,4 million de touristes. \nQuant aux recettes du gross tourism earnings, la Banque de Maurice a publié un \nchiffre de R 93 milliards pour 2024, mais ce que l’histoire ne dit pas, c’est que ce montant est \nartificiel, gonflé par la dépréciation de la roupie et de l’inflation à Maurice, comme dans la \nzone du dollar. Je ne dis pas cela de gaieté de cœur. Comparé à 2019, les recettes touristiques \nn’ont que légèrement augmenté. Je ne suis pas économiste, mais R 93 milliards avec un \ndollar à R 47 et l’inflation que nous subissons aujourd’hui valent peut-être moins de R 66 \nmilliards avec un dollar à R 36 dans le contexte économique de 2019. \nMadame la présidente, je ne peux évoquer le ministère du Tourisme sans parler des \nscandales qui ont éclaboussé la Mauritius Tourism Promotion Authority sous l’ancien régime. \nC’est du vol, Madame la présidente ! Des centaines de millions de roupies parties en fumée. \nLa liste des malversations, des magouilles est longue. Mais, permettez-moi, Madame la \nprésidente, d’en citer quelques-uns. \nTout d’abord, il y a le cas des white parties, Madame la présidente. White parties \norganisées par Maradiva auxquelles la MTPA a contribué. Et là, je parle de l’édition 2024, à \nquelques mois des élections générales. Les services de quatre coco girls originaires des pays \nde l’Est ont été sollicités. \nMadame la présidente, ces danseuses exotiques ont été présentées comme des \njournalistes et des influenceuses. Mais qui a payé le déplacement au coût de R 450 000 ? \nÉvidemment, la MTPA, bien sûr ! Autrement dit, l’argent des contribuables ! C’est une \nvéritable honte, Madame la présidente ! Grâce à l’actualité, les photos de ses white parties, ou \ndevrais-je dire des wild parties, ont refait surface avec certains participants pour le moins \nlouches. Après les Pinokio parties, les pool parties et les ‘dounk’ parties, laissez-moi vous \nparler de l’affaire de Snow Polo que personne ne connaît peut-être. \n(Interruptions) \n\n144 \n \nC’est un événement annuel en Suisse auquel la MTPA et Maradiva participent \nconjointement. Concernant l’édition de 2024, l’organisateur a servi une mise en demeure à la \nMTPA pas plus loin que janvier 2025, il y a quelques semaines, pour des dettes impayées de \nR 2.8 million plus les intérêts et la TVA. Il s’avère, Madame la présidente, que la MTPA avait \nréservé un espace et n’a finalement pas participé à l’événement.  Plus grave encore, Madame \nla présidente, c’est qu’après une enquête interne, il a été découvert que l’ancien directeur \naurait signé l’accord avec l’organisateur sans l’aval du board et sans la signature du \nprésident. \nCe n’est pas tout, Madame la présidente. Selon l’enquête, l’ancien directeur a signé \nl’accord pour le compte de Maradiva et de la MTPA. N’est-ce pas, Madame la présidente, un \ncas de conflit d’intérêt ? Laissez-moi évoquer encore un autre scandale qui a provoqué un \ntollé parmi les internautes. Il s’agit de deux supposés gentlemen à la prestigieuse course \nhippique du Royal Ascot. Enfin !  \nLa MTPA et le Maradiva sont présents à cet évènement de 2016 à 2024. Et il faut dire \nque cette participation a coûté un total, attendez, Madame la président, de R 8.8 millions à la \nMTPA, dont R 8.1 millions ont été versées directement à Maradiva – directement à Maradiva. \nPire, Madame la présidente, pour contourner toutes les procédures, certains paiements ont été \nfaits à travers le représentant de la MTPA à la Londres. Et je ne serai pas étonné que la MTPA \nait financé jusqu’à la redingote et le chapeau haut-de-forme, appelé sapo kankrela, porté par \nces deux du jour. Qui sait, peut-être aussi que les sous-vêtements de Ton George aussi ont \nétaient sponsorisés par… \nAn hon. Member: Dir nom la! \nMr R. Duval: Et ce n’est pas terminé, Madame la présidente, je dois également \névoquer l’affaire des cartes de crédit – cartes de crédit mises à la disposition de l’ancien \ndirecteur de la MTPA. De 2018 à 2024, ce monsieur, Madame la présidente, aurait dépensé la \ncoquette somme, tenez-vous bien, Madame la présidente, de 14,6 millions en achat personnel \n– 14,6 millions ! Il a dépensé 528 000 en 2018 ; en 2019, il a dépensé 1,5 ; en 2020, il a \ndépensé 1,277. Le montant grimpe encore, Madame la présidente, 2 361 000 en 2021 ; 2 798 \n000 en 2022. Puis cela monte encore, 3 487 000 en 2023. Et, enfin, pour terminer, 2 585 000 \nen 2024. Et je rappelle à la Chambre, Madame la présidente, que les frontières étaient \nfermées en grande partie dans les années entre 2020 et 2021. \n\n145 \n \n(Interruptions) \nMais, j’insiste, Madame la présidente, que c’est du vol à grande échelle. Ils n’ont eu aucune, \nalors là, aucune pitié pour les contribuables de notre pays.  \nAn hon. Member: Kot li’nn fote ! \nMr R. Duval: Je m’arrête là, Madame la présidente, car les dépositions ont été \nconsignées par l’officier in charge de la MTPA auprès de la Financial Crimes Commission et \nles enquêtes sont en cours. Mais, je peux vous assurez, Madame la présidente, que nous \nsommes loin d’avoir découvert sur tout ce qui s’est passé à la MTPA.  \nJe profite toutefois de cette occasion, Madame la présidente, pour affirmer haut et fort \nque cette époque est révolue. La MTPA redeviendra la Mauritius Tourism Promotion \nAuthority et non la Maradiva Promotion Authority. J’adresse également une mise en garde \nclaire, nette et ferme que le gouvernement du Dr. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, le Premier \nministre de ce pays, sera intransigeant envers ceux qui confondent leur poche avec les fonds \npublics. \nMadame la présidente, l’urgence de renforcer notre contrôle sur les opérations des \nbateaux de plaisance dans nos eaux est plus pressante que jamais. Ces embarcations sont \ndevenues des instruments silencieux du réseau de trafics de drogues, particulièrement le \ncorridor entre Maurice et l’île de la Réunion. Pour faire face à cette situation, nous allons \nrendre obligatoire l’installation d’un système d’identification automatique, AIS, sur tous les \nbateaux de plaisance. Ce dispositif permettra un suivi réel des déplacements des \nembarcations. J’ai eu l’occasion d’avoir une réunion avec le commissaire de police, et \nj’espère ne pas commettre d’impair en indiquant qu’il était très enthousiaste à l’idée.  \nNous allons aussi créer des zones de mouillage, dédier un système d’attributions de \nbouées individuelles. Ce projet permettra une surveillance plus efficace, avec une détection \nrapide des activités suspectes. Nous ne voulons pas que des bateaux de couleur bleue quittent \nle nord pour revenir de couleur orange et chargés à ras bord, si vous voyez où je veux en \nvenir.  \nMadame la présidente, je profite de cette opportunité pour annoncer, avec l’aval du Dr. \nNavinchandra Ramgoolam, du PMO, que nous allons bientôt nous doter d’un système de \nreconnaissance qu’on appelle Iris Recognition System. Fini les longues attentes à l’aéroport, \n\n146 \n \nfinies les procédures administratives lourdes à l’immigration. Ces smart gates permettront \nd’accélérer le passage des visiteurs aux contrôles et soulager le personnel affecté aux \ndifférentes procédures aéroportuaires. Et l’installation de ces portiques intelligents n’est pas \nqu’une simple question d’infrastructure, mais c’est un impératif stratégique pour notre secteur \ntouristique. \nDe plus, Madame la présidente, les cas de vols et d’agressions contre les touristes \nconstituent un véritable fléau qui mine le secteur et porte atteinte à l’image de notre \ndestination. J’ai eu encore l’occasion de parler au commissaire de police et il m’a assuré que \nle personnel de la police du Tourisme sera renforcé dans un avenir proche. \nMadame la présidente, le discours-programme met un accent particulier sur \nl’écotourisme et le tourisme durable. Aujourd’hui, ce n’est pas une option, mais c’est une \nnécessité, et c’est également ce que souligne le blueprint de 2024 à 2033, élaboré par une \nmission de conseil de la Banque mondiale. Ce plan directeur, commandité par le ministère du \nTourisme, est prêt depuis 2024, Madame la présidente, et je m’étonne que mon prédécesseur, \nl’ancien ministre, n’ait pas trouvé le temps ou alors n’ait pas jugé utile de le finaliser et de le \npublier. C’est tout simplement aberrant, Madame la présidente. Le plan directeur 2024-2033 \nrejoint ma philosophie, qui est le modèle Sea, Sand and Sun, qui a bien servi le pays et qui va \ncontinuer à le faire, mais doit, aujourd’hui, être épaulé et soutenu par d’autres concepts. \nMadame la présidente, aujourd’hui, de plus en plus de touristes privilégient des \nexpériences authentiques, loin des grands complexes hôteliers. Ils veulent rencontrer des \nMauriciens, découvrir des facettes de notre culture et de notre histoire, et vivre une \nexpérience immersive. Tant mieux, Madame la présidente, car, quel autre pays au monde, \nmalgré sa petite taille, peut se vanter d’être un véritable carrefour de cultures, de religions, de \ntraditions et de gastronomies ? Nous devons nous adapter à cette nouvelle réalité, et c’est \npourquoi, Madame la présidente, notre nouvelle stratégie mettra l’accent sur le tourisme \nintérieur. Nous allons aussi, ensemble avec le ministre des Arts et de la Culture, valoriser \nl’identité culturelle et le patrimoine unique de l’île Maurice et, en parallèle, cela va créer des \nnouvelles opportunités pour les petites entreprises locales et contribuer à une véritable \ndémocratisation de notre économie. \nMadame la présidente, notre stratégie de développement touristique s’orientera vers \nplusieurs segments prometteurs, notamment le tourisme de santé et de bien-être, le tourisme \n\n147 \n \nculturel, patrimonial, enrichi par la création des circuits thématiques, le tourisme sportif, le \ntourisme médical, le tourisme communautaire favorisant la participation active des habitants. \nLe secteur Meetings, Incentives, Conferences and Exhibitions (MICE) représente un \npotentiel considérable pour les marchés accessibles et c’est à travers ça et avec l’émergence \ndu dynamique et de l’économie africaine et la montée en puissance de ces grandes entreprises \nque ce sera une opportunité stratégique qui s’offre à l’île Maurice. \nNous sommes idéalement positionnés à seulement quatre à six heures de vol pour attirer \nles Africains en pleine expansion et leur proposer une destination d’excellence pour leurs \névénements professionnels. \nMadame la présidente, le discours-programme met à juste valeur l’accent sur un \ntourisme durable, plus inclusif, participatif, grâce à un engagement accru et davantage \nd’initiatives communautaires. Aujourd’hui les voyageurs ne se contentent plus des plages \nparadisiaques. Ils jugent une destination selon les critères environnementaux éthiques et ce \nprofil des voyageurs écoresponsables est en constante augmentation et il pourrait représenter \n40 à 50 % des visiteurs d’ici 2050. \nIgnorer ces évolutions, Madame la présidente, c’est condamner notre industrie \ntouristique… \nMadam Speaker: Time is up! \nMr R. Duval: I am finishing. I am trying. Nous allons obtenir la certification de \nprime… \nMadam Speaker: Il faut garder un peu. M. le ministre, excusez-moi ? Je suis sûre que \nvous avez encore de choses intéressantes à dire… \nMr R. Duval: Trop beaucoup ! \nMadam Speaker: Mais il faudra trouver d’autres occasions pour nous le dire. \nMr R. Duval: Définitivement. Je vais probablement passer près de la conclusion, \nMadame la présidente. Et en vous disant que c’est autant plus crucial que l’Europe, notre \nprincipal marché, traverse actuellement des difficultés économiques susceptibles de faire \naugmenter le coût des voyages. L’Allemagne, par exemple, est frappée par une récession \nalors que la France vient tout juste, à partir du 1ᵉʳ mars, d’augmenter la taxe sur les billets \n\n148 \n \nd’avion. Nous devrons diversifier nos marchés et étendre notre connectivité aérienne vers des \nnouvelles destinations. \n Et autre chose, un autre défi majeur, c’est la basse saison. C’est l’une de mes \nprincipales préoccupations depuis mon arrivée au ministère. C’est pour cette raison que j’ai \nconfié ce dossier au junior minister, l’honorable Sydney Pierre, afin qu’ensemble avec les \npartenaires, nous puissions prendre des mesures appropriées pour la période creuse de mai à \nseptembre. \nMadame la présidente, vite fait, je vais parler de l’École Hôtelière Sir Gaëtan Duval… \nMadam Speaker: M. le ministre, excusez-moi ? \nMr R. Duval: J’ai fini, okay. Je conclus, Madame… \nMadam Speaker: Non, rien ne vous empêche de venir la prochaine fois avec un \nstatement.  \nMr R. Duval: Oui, certainement Madame. Je conclus alors. Le travail commencé, nous \nsommes en train de revoir notre stratégie de marketing, de revitaliser l’identité de Maurice, de \ncibler les segments spécifiques tels que les amateurs de nature et explorateur culturel, \nd’attirer davantage de profils de voyageurs.  \nEt, Madame la présidente, le secteur du tourisme fait aujourd’hui face à une terrible \ncompétition. Pour survivre, nous devrons arriver à vendre notre pays comme une destination \nde premier plan attractive et compétitive. Une destination d’excellence et ça, c’est ma vision \net c’est à quoi je m’attelle depuis mon arrivée à ce ministère, mais aucun ministre du \nTourisme ne peut atteindre de tels objectifs, seul. Pour y arriver, il faut la coopération et la \ncollaboration de tous, c’est-à-dire des acteurs du secteur et de la population. Ensemble, \nMadame, relevons le défi. Vive l’île Maurice ! Vive la République ! \nJe vous remercie. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister! Please keep an eye. \n(9.07 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity (Mr A. Subron): Madam Speaker, I am speaking in front of you because, as rightly stated in the \nopening sentence of the Presidential Address, the people have spoken. Indeed, I am here as a \n\n149 \n \nMember of the National Assembly and Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and \nNational Solidarity because of the votes of the people of Mauritius, including the people of \nmy constituency, Port Louis North and Montagne Longue. So, my whole-hearted thanks go \nfirst and foremost to the esteemed and enlightened people of Mauritius, from villages to \ntowns all around Mauritius. Then my special thanks go to the women, men, workers, poor \npeople, small-scale producers, traders, and pensioners of Constituency No. 4, from Ste Croix \nto Congomah, from Montagne Longue to Cité la Cure, from Vallée des Prêtres to Notre \nDame, from Terre Rouge to Les Mariannes, from Riche Terre to Crève Coeur, from Bois \nMarchand to Ti Rodrigues, and all other regions. \nI finally wish to thank hon. Dr. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, Prime Minister, and hon. \nPaul Bérenger, Deputy Prime Minister, for having proposed to me to stand as a candidate in \nConstituency No. 4, which is a perfect snapshot of Mauritius with its rural and urban \ncharacteristics. The people on No. 4 are now part of my life and family, as are the workers, \nthe poor, and the citizens of Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker, I am here standing in this prestigious House because the people of \nMauritius overwhelmingly voted for the Alliance du Changement, in which my party, \nRezistans ek Alternativ, is the humble partner together with the Labour Party, the Mouvement \nMilitant Mauricien, and the Nouveaux Démocrates. It is worth detailing for Members of this \nAssembly, for the people of Mauritius, and for the record of history the genesis of the \nAlliance du Changement and the present Presidential Address being debated by this \nAssembly, where fundamental constitutional changes are at its core. \nIt was in August 2022 when Rezistans ek Alternativ considered a red line was crossed \nwith the mafiosisation, an autocratic characteristic of the previous regime that started to \nunveil with the Kistnen assassination, that our party called for the unification of all \nparliamentary and all extra-parliamentary forces to form an electoral front to change the \nprevious government and elect a new transition government to bring both regime change and \nsystem change. When the mafiosisation expanded in wider tentacles with the sniffing episode \nof Baie-Jacotet and the planting operations against political opponents of the regime, we \nintensified our initiative. Then follows a conversation process of nearly one and a half years \nwith Rezistans ek Alternativ meetings, all Opposition forces for the establishment of the \ncommon front and the transition government to bring in constitutional changes. \n\n150 \n \nSubsequently, a constitutional conference was organised by Rezistans ek Alternativ on \n31 March 2024, in which almost all the opposition parties participated. A consensus towards \nconstitutional reform to decolonise and mauritianise the Constitution emerged. \nAfterwards, some extra-parliamentary forces decided to pursue separate pathways in \nthe coming elections, opting instead for a three- or four-cornered electoral fight. Rezistans ek \nAlternativ did not share this view, given that we firmly believe that it would matter and make \na difference for the people of Mauritius if the MSM regime were not returned to power. The \nmafiosisation and institutional crisis that developed should be stopped. \nSecondly, our party was of the view that to enable system change, a three-quarter \nmajority would be needed in the National Assembly. Rezistans ek Alternativ continued the \nunification process, and amidst the electoral heat-up, the Leader of the Labour Party, now the \npresent Prime Minister, called for a meeting with him and the Leader of the MMM, now \nDeputy Prime Minister, after the PMSD separated from the PTr/MMM/PMSD Alliance. From \nthis point onwards, some ten meetings were held at Riverwalk. \nThe core of the constitutional reform in the present Government Programme stems \nfrom these fruitful deliberations between the Labour Party led by the hon. Prime Minister, Dr. \nNavinchandra Ramgoolam, the MMM led by the Deputy Prime Minister, hon. Paul Bérenger; \nand Rezistans ek Alternativ team, and ultimately led by its teams of spokespersons. \n The core of the present Government Programme is a product of, and at the same time, \ncomplimentary to the electoral agreement of PTr-MMM-MD-ReA, signed on 13 September \n2024, and the electoral manifesto rendered public on 29 October 2024. \nMadam Speaker, the last election will be one to be remembered in history. The \nmafiosation, authoritarianism, and even fascistic characteristics of the previous regime were \nexposed, vindicated, and confirmed during the last two weeks of the electoral campaign by \nMissie Moustass Leaks and the Facebook social media ban. The people then decided to act \nlike vigilantes of the electoral processes. They supervised the ballot box process and \norganised a massive vigilante in front of the polling stations. They organised their pens and \nscrupulously scrutinised the whole electoral process. The people of Mauritius not only \nejected the previous government but also said never again and charted the destiny of a new \nMauritius. \nI must stress that never in the history of Mauritius have such extensive constitutional \nreforms programmes obtained such an overwhelming and absolute democratic mandate from \n\n151 \n \nthe people of this country. Indeed, the opening chapter of the Presidential Address says, I \nquote – \n“Government has received a clear and overwhelming mandate for a drastic change of \ncourse (…). \nThe very first mission of Government is to reconstruct our democracy, restore good \ngovernance and implement constitutional reforms.” \nThe 10th of November 2024 and the unfolding new period are indeed defining a pivotal \nmoment in the history of our country. What we do or do not do now will have consequences \nfar beyond the coming five years. We are at the end of several interlinked short- and long-\nterm time cycles, both in relation to Mauritius's socio-politics and in relation to the history of \nhumanity, the life of species, and the planet itself. The 2024 General Elections marked the \nend of Jugnauth’s regime of a 10-year cycle. The year 2024 marked the end of the post-\nindependence cycle. The operating system inherited at the time of independence, the \nConstitution, has made its time, and now needs to be reviewed. \nIn terms of human society history, we are now facing a crisis of this so-called \ncivilisation itself. An existential crisis never known in the history of humankind. A long \nmillennial cycle is ending, and another one is yet to be born. In terms of biological time, the \ntime of life of living species on earth, we are amid the sixth extinction crisis, threatening \nvarious species and many forms of life on the planet. A cycle of millions of years is ending. \nIn terms of geological time, we were in the middle of fundamental change in the time of the \nearth system whereby planet Earth itself is in crisis, in a state of fundamental change due to \nthe climate and crisis of crossing of the limit of ecological boundaries. \nAccording to many scientists, Earth is dangerously moving from the stable Holocene \nepoch to enter into a new unstable and crisis-ridden epoch, which has now been coined the \nAnthropocene. Any person who will look back to Mauritius after 50 years will definitely \nrealise that this country was at a historical, decisive, and defining moment of socio-ecological \nchange in 2025 after the people have spoken and elected a new government in 2024. \nThis defining moment will mark a significant forward leap in history with the major \nshift in societal norms, structures, or behaviours driven by the present political actions that \nwe will be taking by adopting the Presidential Address and hon. Dr. Ms Babita Thannoo’s \nmotion. The Constitutional Reform Agenda proposed by this Government Programme aimed \nat, inter alia, an interrelated socio-ecological and democratic transformation. \n\n152 \n \nThe Government Programme proposes to recognise the right of every citizen to stand as \na candidate in elections as citizens without any compulsory community classification. The \nGovernment Programme carries a panoply of democratic reforms, from the introduction of \nthe right of recall, an electoral reform with a dose of proportional representation to ensure \nmore equitable political and ideological streams, to ensuring better gender representation in \nthe National Assembly. \nThe Government Programme will guarantee local elections within the Constitution. The \nGovernment Programme proposes to enshrine the right of nature coupled with public interest \nlitigation and class action judicial concepts within the Constitution, making Mauritius a \nvanguard country in terms of socio-ecological sustainability. The Government Programme \nwill enshrine social, economic, and cultural rights as recognised by the United Nations within \nthe Constitution. Thus, promoting a socio-economic rights-based society, offering additional \nconstitutional protection against social discrimination in terms of housing, education, health \ncare access, employment, and social security, as well as languages and cultures. \nThe Government Programme aims at consolidating section 16 of the Constitution by \nadding new categories of people to be protected, for example, to protect people with \ndisabilities. The proposition of enshrining the values of peace, justice, and liberty within \nsection 1 of the Constitution marks a qualitative elevation of the fundamental core values of \nthe republic and its people. \nThe Government Programme recognises the digital time we are in and proposes to \nintegrate digital rights and protections of citizens against any form of surveillance by the \nState or corporate entities. Again, placing Mauritius among the pioneers in this domain. The \ninstitution of a new Constitutional Appointment Committee would ensure more independence \nof our institutions. To top it all is the creation of a Constitutional Division of the Supreme \nCourt. \nMadam Speaker, the constitutional reforms will create a new set of socio-ecological \nand democratic boundaries when compounded with the restoration of civil and political rights \nand will redefine the boundaries within which social organisation, the new economy, and the \nnew social order will be organised. I think this precision is of key importance. \nThe hoarse immediate Constitutional change in the pipeline is the concretisation of the \nsigned electoral agreement between the Labour Party-MMM-ND and Rezistans ek Alternativ. \nIt aims, I quote – \n\n153 \n \n « … [at recognising] le droit aux citoyens de la République de se présenter aux \nélections comme tels sans aucune obligation faite à ces derniers/dernières de se \nclassifier de façon communale. L’Alliance du Changement s’engage ainsi dans les \npremiers six mois au pouvoir à rendre permanent le mini-amendement constitutionnel \ntemporaire de 2014 ayant permis aux candidats de ne pas se classifier. Ceci en \nattendant la proposition de réforme électorale en bonne et due forme que présentera \nl’Alliance du Changement. En ce faisant, l’État mauricien sera conforme à l’avis du \nComité des droits humains des Nations unies sur la question. » \nThe Government Programme consolidates this agreement and proposes that to promote \nnational unity and nation building, constitutional amendments will be brought to remove the \nmandatory declaration of community affiliation, thus allowing candidates to stand for the \nNational Assembly Elections without being required to make any declaration as to their \ncommunity. By so doing, the government will ensure that all citizens have the right to stand \nas candidates for elections even if they do not wish to declare their community affiliation. \nThis fundamental amendment to come is beyond electoral systems and the rights of \ncitizens to stand as candidates. It is the product of long historical struggles fought by \ngenerations on this issue, but, more fundamentally, it is at the heart of the making of every \nchild born on this land and every Mauritian. The mini amendment proposed to be translated \nin the next two months will be the litmus test of the whole constitutional reform programme \nof our Government as it will act as the launching pad of the major constitutional reform \nprogramme. I am sure the Office of the hon. Attorney General will work hard and present \nshortly to the Cabinet and the Government an updated version of the 2014 mini amendment. \nOur country, Mauritius, we must always remember, is one of the latest-born nations on \nplanet earth. We are both a nation of immigrants who brought the richness of their traditions, \ncultures, and beliefs, and a product of colonisation, the slavery system, and bondage labour. \nWhat we are today, through our living together, through our harsh but rich history, through \nour struggles against oppression in colonial and post-colonial Mauritius, and through our \nmoments of joy and tragedy, make us whole. All these features define us; our common \nhistory has forged and shaped our multiple and indivisible identity. It has shaped our most \nprecious common dynamics, our Mauritianism. We are one and all; we are all and one. \nOur nation-building process, our multiple and indivisible identities, and our \nMauritianism emerged at a very early stage when the first child was born on this land during \n\n154 \n \nDutch colonisation. He was named Simon Van der Stel, born from the marriage of the then \nDutch governor and his slave-originated wife. The first Mauritian society was born in 1710 \nwhen the Dutch left Mauritius, and before French colonisers came in 1721. \nFrom this moment on, for 300 years, our common destiny has been harsh and painful \nbut a rich one too. For example, from the cultural genocide which the slavery system \nrepresented were born, from the children of the time, our common mother tongue, our Creole \nlanguage now spoken by more than 95% of the population. Social bonds were built through \nstruggles against oppression in 1937 and 1943, during independence time, and in the workers' \nand youth struggles of the 70s. \nDuring colonial times, with neighbourhood solidarity in villages and urban areas, we \nfaced common poverty and shared a little of what we had. We understood the lives and the \nreality of the people of the same social class with our diversities. In moments of joy like the \nJeux des îles de l'océan Indien or whenever our fellow Mauritians are abroad, we can feel our \nMauritianism within our bodies. In moments of tragedies such as the flash floods of Canal \nDayot of 2013 or, more recently, during the ecological tragedy of Wakashio in 2020, our \nMauritianism erupted in Mahébourg and the whole of the country. \nIt was the same Mauritianism which erupted during the recent elections. So, it is the \nduty of all of us to bring in this first constitutional amendment and pave the way for the great \nleap of fundamental constitutional transformation our nation and the new generation aspire \nto. I had a whole section on social security; I will follow your advice, I will skip it and have a \nstatement later in the Assembly, and I will conclude. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, thank you. \nMr Subron: Madam Speaker, let me conclude by this quotation – \n“There are decades where nothing happens and there are months where decades \nhappen.” \nWe are exactly in this situation, when history is being accelerated. The Government \nProgramme has captured the profound aspiration of the people. This Government led by three \nparties: the Labour Party, the MMM and Rezistans ek Alternative which originate from \nemancipation and enlightenment have the historical mission and cannot afford to fail. We will \nfulfil our duty with our partner of the Nouveaux Démocrates. Indeed, some conservative \nforces, some economically powerful forces, the usual profiters, and the cronies will try to \nblock the great leap forward agenda of the Government Programme, but then, it is our duty to \n\n155 \n \nremind them that the people have indeed spoken on 10 November 2024 in their pacific \nprintemps mauricien. \nChange and transformation are conscious acts for the betterment of the many. For life \nsystems of our habitat, for our commons, but change always shakes the privilege of a few. To \nthose forces, I would simply repeat and say a slogan used by the Prime Minister, Dr. the hon. \nNavinchandra Ramgoolam, in 2010 – ‘pa grat ledo maler’. Let me also say, the forces who \ntried to block the sociopolitical emancipation have all failed, from the abolition of slavery to \nindependence time. \nMadam Speaker, my party is proud to be part of the long historical transformative \njourney towards the socioecological and systemic transformation of Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker, allow me to raise my fist there to say let Mauritian be Mauritian \nforever, with our multiple and indivisible identity. Dan mwa ena tou. Viv nou morisianism ! \nViv mama later ! \nMadam Speaker: Thank you so much for respecting the time. Yes, hon. Minister! \nMr Bhagwan: Madam Speaker, I beg to move for the adjournment of the debates. \nDr. Boolell rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to.  \nDebate adjourned accordingly. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister! \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Friday 07 March 2025 at 3.00 p.m. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned! \nAdjournment time! Yes, one! I will allow one. \nMATTER RAISED \n(9.31 p.m.) \n\n156 \n \nDRUG PROLIFERATION – FOREIGN EXPERTISE \nMr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Riviere des Anguilles & Souillac): My \nquestion is addressed to the hon. Prime Minister. Given the proliferation of drugs over the last \nten years like never before, I am afraid to say that if we do not act firmly and forcefully, the \nsituation may become irreversible. With all due respect to our police service, without \nundermining the police service, I would like to ask the hon. Prime Minister whether the \nGovernment is contemplating having foreign expertise to assist us in our fight against drugs \nand drug trafficking. Thank you. \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, yes. Thank you for reminding us; we all know \nwhat the problem with drugs is. We are renaming what was NATReSA, as you know; we will \nhave like a czar in the person of Mr Sam Lauthan, who knows how to deal with these, but we \nwill also have expert advice from abroad. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Thank you everybody. \nAt 9.32 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Friday 07 March 2025 at \n3.00 p.m. \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nMAURITIAN CITIZENSHIP – ALLOCATION – JAN 2015-NOV 2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/113",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 113,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/113) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Mauritius Football Association, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom information as to – \n(a) \nwhether all procedures were followed with regard to the Elective General \nAssembly thereof held on 27 November 2024, indicating the – \n(i) \nnames of the candidates for the post of President of the Association, and  \n(ii) \nthe reasons as to why the candidature of Mr E. R. for the post was rejected, \nand  \n(b) \nthe composition of the newly elected managing committee of the Association.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nBABY S. – FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-04-march-2025",
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/114",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 114,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/114) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to Baby S. \nadmitted at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of the SSRN Hospital on 21 October 2022, she \nwill state if consideration will be given to making public the recommendations of the Fact-\nFinding Committee set up to look into this case.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nMOTOR VEHICLE LICENCE – RENEWAL PAYMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/115",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 115,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/115) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the motor vehicle \nlicence, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport \nAuthority, information as to whether consideration will be given for the payment thereof to \nbe made available during the whole month when same is due and, if so, when and if not, why \nnot.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the National Land Transport Authority (NLTA) that Motor \nVehicle Licence (MVL), commonly known as “Déclaration” is payable 15 days before the \nend of the month it is due for renewal.  MVLs can also be renewed 15 days after their expiry \nwithout any fine. However, subsequent to these 15 days after expiry, a fine of 50% of the \namount due is payable upon renewal of the MVL. \n\n160 \n \nMVL renewals can be effected on the Online MVL platform of the NLTA or at any of \nthe 112 post offices around the island.  \nNevertheless, any transaction of MVL involving the 50% fine can only be effected \neither online or at the NLTA Head Office at Cassis and the sub offices located at Forest Side \nand Flacq. \nPursuant to the proposal of the Third Member, the NLTA has been requested to \nconsider the possibility for the payment of MVL to be made available during the whole \nmonth, after consultation with stakeholders. \nPETIT VERGER & MONTAGNE ORY – RECURRENT FLOODING – \nEROSION & LANDSLIDES RISK",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/116",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 116,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/116) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the recurrent flooding in the \nregions of Petit Verger and Montagne Ory, he will state if he has been aware of cases of risk \nof erosion and landslides affecting houses and buildings thereat, indicating – \n(a) \nthe number of families having been served with evacuation orders;  \n(b) \nif there has been any survey carried out previously on the conditions of these \nhouses and buildings, giving details thereof, and \n(c) \nthe action taken and/or being envisaged to relodge the inhabitants whose houses \nand buildings are at risk.",
      "answer": "Reply: Regarding part (a) of the question, I confirm that the District Council of Moka \nhas issued five official evacuation notices under the Building Control Act. These notices, \nserved in January and October 2024, required the affected families to vacate their homes due \nto structural instability and potential risks to their safety. \nFor part (b), I am informed that a joint technical survey was conducted on 05 and 06 \nJune 2023.  This survey was carried out by representatives from – \n• \nthe Geotechnical Unit of the then Ministry of National Infrastructure and \nCommunity Development; \n• \nthe National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Centre, and \n• \nthe Land Drainage Authority. \nTheir assessment confirmed the presence of severe soil erosion, landslide risks, and \nstructural weaknesses in multiple houses in the affected regions. These findings indicate an \nurgent need for intervention to prevent potential disasters. \n\n161 \n \nRegarding part (c), my Ministry is actively coordinating with the Ministry of National \nInfrastructure to implement immediate and long-term mitigation measures for landslides and \nsoil erosion in Rivière Profonde.  The Land Drainage Authority had previously delegated \nthese countermeasures to the National Development Unit for execution. However, given the \ncontinued risk, my Ministry will ensure follow-up actions and monitor the progress of \nremedial works. \nAdditionally, if the situation demands, I will personally conduct an on-site visit, \naccompanied by Members of the National Assembly for Constituency No. 8 and relevant \ntechnical experts, to assess the current conditions and engage directly with affected residents. \nFurthermore, my Ministry is working with the National Disaster Risk Reduction and \nManagement Committee to identify and secure temporary or permanent relocation options for \nthese five displaced families.  We are exploring both short-term emergency housing solutions \nand long-term resettlement plans, depending on the feasibility of remedial measures at their \noriginal locations. \nThe Government remains committed to ensuring the safety of all affected residents and \nwill act swiftly to provide necessary support and solutions. \n \nLA SOURCE FOOTBALL PLAYGROUND – CLASSIFICATION – SAFETY \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-04-march-2025",
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/117",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 117,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/117) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to La Source Football \nplayground, he will state – \n(a) \nif he has been made aware of – \n(i) \nthe non-compliance thereof to be classified as a football field, and  \n(ii) \nthe construction of a concrete barrier at the playground, and  \n(b) \nthe measures being envisaged for the safety of the players thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nPAS GÉOMÉTRIQUES – STATE LAND – SMALL RESIDENTIAL LEASEHOLDERS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/118",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 118,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/118) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to small residential leaseholders \nof State land on Pas Géométriques around the island, he will state if his Ministry will \n\n162 \n \nconsider amending the relevant legislations to grant freehold title for those having occupied \nthose lands for more than 30 to 40 years at a given price and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Reply: I wish to refer to the reply I made in response to supplementary question to PQ \nB/38 on 04 February last to the effect that Pas Géométriques is inalienable.  \nAs a matter of fact, reserved lands along the sea coast, commonly called the Pas \nGéométriques and referred to in the Arrêté of General Decaen of 05 May 1807, form part of \nthe domaine public and are, according to section 2(1) of the Pas Géométriques Act, \ninalienable and imprescriptible. \nIt was during the French Colonisation that the Pas Géométriques were specifically \nestablished for defence of the island and public utility and thus being of domaine public.  \nFollowing the passage of cyclones Alix and Carol in the early 60s, building site leases \nwere granted to low-income families whose houses were destroyed for the construction of a \nresidential unit. These leases were on State land, including Pas Géométriques. \nMoreover, the ex-Central Housing Authority (CHA) constructed some 19,442 housing \nunits to rehouse cyclone victims. Out of the 19,442 housing units, 897 are located on Pas \nGéométriques. \nSince then, it has been the practice for subsequent governments to grant building site \nleases to low-income earners to enable them to construct a house of their own. To date, some \n22,000 building site leases have been granted across the island, out of which some 4,000 are \nlocated on Pas Géométriques.  \nToday, it is a matter of pride for me to remind that it was during the period from July \n2005 to December 2014 when the Labour Party was in government that those successive \namendments were brought to the State Lands Act to enable these building site lessees to \npurchase the plot of land on which stand their houses for the modest sum of Rs2000.  \nSuch measure has enabled 14,678 low-income earners to become land owners. The sale \nof land to the remaining building site lessees under this measure is still ongoing. At present, \nsome 5,189 applications for purchase of State land are under process at my Ministry.  \nAs I mentioned earlier, such measure is, by virtue of existing legislation, not applicable \nto some 4,897 building site lessees, whose housing units are on Pas Géométriques. \nTo consider amending the present legislation to enable sale of State land on Pas \nGéométriques would require a major policy decision by government. This will require prior \nthoughtful and in-depth discussions which go far beyond the remit of my Ministry alone.  \n\n163 \n \nMy Ministry has already started having brainstorming sessions and will be consulting \nother concerned ministries and departments. It goes without saying that the Attorney \nGeneral’s Office will have a prominent role in these discussions. \n \nLIVERPOOL FOOTBALL ACADEMY – PROJECT COST – OUTCOME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/119",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 119,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/119) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Liverpool Football \nAcademy Project, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the sum \ninvested into the academy up to December 2024, indicating the outcome derived under this \nproject for Mauritius.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nMONKEYS’ EXPORTATION – YEARLY GENERATED REVENUE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-04-march-2025",
        "tuesday-09-december-2025",
        "friday-12-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/120",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 120,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/120) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nwhether, in regard to monkeys, he will state the number thereof exported, yearly, since 2014 \nto date, indicating the – \n(a) \naverage selling price thereof, and \n(b) \nthe annual revenue generated yearly, since 2014 to date.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nSICOM – PENSIONS FUND STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/121",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 121,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/121) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard \nto the pension funds managed by the State Insurance Company of Mauritius Ltd., she will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain therefrom information as to – \n(a) \nthe status of the funds from 2014 to 2024, indicating the qualifications and \nbenefits drawn by those managing same, and  \n(b)  whether any case of mismanagement has been reported in relation thereto and, if \nso, the actions taken to remedy the situation.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBUS & TAXIS – PUBLIC SERVICES LICENSES  \n\n164",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-04-march-2025",
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/122",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 122,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Education and Human \nResource – \n \nWhether, in regard to the recent reported cases of \nharassment and bullying in educational institutions, \nschools and colleges, he will state (a) the number thereof \nand (b) immediate measures taken thereon? \n \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                          PAGE 16 of 17 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": "NOT ANSWERED",
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/123",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 123,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/123) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the issue of temporary public \nservices licenses for bus and taxis, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, \ninformation as to the number of such licenses delivered from 2015 to 2024, \nindicating the procedures adopted to award these licenses, and \n(b) \nstate if consideration will be given for the setting up of an inquiry to look into the \ncircumstances for the granting of these licenses.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nMR P. U. – SLOVAKIAN NATIONAL – EXTRADITION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/124",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 124,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/124) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Attorney-General whether, in regard to Mr P. U., a Slovakian national, he \nwill state the circumstances that led to the removal of the Slovakian despite pending \nextradition proceedings before the Port Louis District Court (3rd Division) and an interim \norder from the Supreme Court, duly served on the relevant authorities, indicating the action \ntaken and/or being envisaged to prevent any such occurrence.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIUS & RODRIGUES – ENERGY SECURITY – INCREASING DEMAND & \nMEASURES – FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/125",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 125,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/125) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nEnergy & Public Utilities whether, in regard to energy security, he will – \n(a)  state the policy of Government thereon, and  \n(b)  for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Electricity Board, \ninformation as to the current demand for electricity across the Republic, \nindicating the – \n(i)  \nmeasures being envisaged to meet the increase in demand thereof, and  \n(ii)  financial assistance extended, if any, to consumers of residentials units for \nthe installation of electric poles, green energy solutions and renewable \nenergy installations in mainland Mauritius and Rodrigues. \n\n165",
      "answer": "Reply: Energy Security remains one of the priorities of this Government.  As \nannounced in the Government Programme 2025-2029, Government will review the energy \npolicy of the country and implement a comprehensive energy transition programme.  To this \nend, my Ministry is working on a new Energy Plan both for Mauritius and Rodrigues. The \nPlan will cater for base load as well as intermittent variable renewable energy, taking into \naccount the growing demand in the coming years as well as the state of infrastructure.  \nAs regard to part (b)(i) of the question, I am informed by the Central Electricity Board \n(CEB) that the highest power demand for Mauritius was recorded on 05 February 2025 and \nwas of the order of 567.9MW.  As for the island of Rodrigues, as I indicated in my previous \nreplies to PQ B/88 and B/89, the all-time peak demand stood at 8.97MW and was recorded \non 03 February 2025 at 19 00hrs.  \nI have stated on several occasions in this House that there has been a lack of planning in \nthe power sector. The new Board of the CEB has conducted a review of the generation plan \nof CEB. It has been found that several generating units have been in operation for more than \n25 years. There has been hardly any investment in renewing these units.  A new Energy Plan \nwill be elaborated to cater for energy security and the green energy transition.  It will concern \nboth Mauritius and Rodrigues. \nIn addition to reinforcing production capacity, it is equally important to curb the \nincreasing demand for electricity.  In this context, the activities of the Energy Efficiency \nManagement Office (EEMO), operating under my Ministry will be revamped.  It will be \ncalled upon to play a more proactive role together with CEB on energy saving, energy \nconservation and energy efficiency. Over the past months, an aggressive national sensitisation \ncampaign has been carried out to sensitise the public at large, including high usage \nconsumers and hotels, on the efficient use of air conditioners and other electrical appliances.  \nThe campaign has resulted in a stabilisation of electricity consumption towards the end of \nFebruary this year.  This exercise will be pursued throughout the year. \nAs regard to part (b)(ii) of the question, I am informed by the CEB that it offers a \nfinancial assistance scheme to customers of residential units of both Mauritius and Rodrigues \nfor the installation of electric poles whereby, the new applicants are eligible for 5 spans free \nof charge subject to certain specific conditions being fulfilled.  Further, the CEB has \ndemocratised access to its grid to enable each customer category to participate in the green \nenergy transition by producing and selling energy to CEB at an interesting tariff.  Various \n\n166 \n \nschemes and projects are thus being implemented by the CEB and are applicable in Mauritius \nand Rodrigues. These schemes and projects target residential customers, commercial \ncustomers, industrial customers, Electric Vehicles owners, smart cities, public sector entities \nand so on. Rooftop Photovoltaics are installed free of change for eligible beneficiaries under \nthe Home Solar Project Scheme and the Scheme for Religious Institutions, Charitable \nInstitutions and Non-Governmental Organisations. \nTRIOLET & BAIE DU TOMBEAU – METHADONE DISTRIBUTION – ANTI-\nSOCIAL BEHAVIOURS ON SITE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/126",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 126,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/126) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the distribution of Methadone in \nTriolet and Baie du Tombeau, he will state – \n(a) \nthe number of human resources deployed therefor; \n(b) \nthe number of patients/users of methadone receiving methadone on a daily basis \nat both centres, and \n(c)  if his Ministry is aware of the problems caused by patients lingering at both sites \nlong after receiving methadone, indicating the measures being envisaged to \naddress same.",
      "answer": "Reply: I wish to point out that two vehicles, each with a Pharmacy Technician and one \nNursing Officer are deployed at each of the two dispensing sites at Triolet and Baie du \nTombeau in the yard of the police stations to ensure dispensing of Methadone. It is to be \nnoted that at least one Police Officer is in principle required to be present at each dispensing \nsite. \nEach vehicle is escorted by the Police from SSRN Hospital where methadone doses are \nprepared to the dispensing site and back after dispensing in order to ensure that unused \nmethadone is safely returned to the pharmacy of the hospital. \nAs regard to part (b) of the question, as at 31 January 2025, some 174 beneficiaries \nreceive their methadone doses in the yard of Triolet Police Station and around 42 inside the \nTriolet Mediclinic. At Baie du Tombeau, some 88 beneficiaries receive their daily doses in \nthe yard of the Police Station. \nMy Ministry is well aware of the problems namely loitering, littering and other anti-\nsocial behaviours of the patients after dispensing time. \n\n167 \n \nIn this respect, regular meetings have been held at the level of the SSRN Hospital with \nall stakeholders including the Police to ensure that the latter takes necessary action pertaining \nto law and order as well as antisocial behaviours. \n \nNTC – SPARE PARTS – BIDDING EXERCISES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/127",
      "sitting_id": "04-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-04",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 127,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/127) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the National Transport Corporation, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to the bidding exercises \nlaunched by the Corporation for the procurement and award of contracts for spare parts since \nJanuary 2023 to date, indicating – \n(a) \nthe names of the suppliers thereof, further indicating in each case the – \n(i) \ncontractual value thereof, and \n(ii) \namount paid to the suppliers, and \n(b) \nif he has been aware of any irregularities and/or malpractices regarding the \nprocurement thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-04-march-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/128",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 128,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/128) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the construction of a New Air Traffic Control Tower at the Sir Seewoosagur \nRamgoolam International Airport, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Civil \nAviation Department, information as to the – \n(a) \nlist of contractors shortlisted for the project; \n(b) \ncurrent status of the project, indicating the amount of fund disbursed so far, and \n(c) \nexpected completion date thereof. \n\n23",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the construction of the New \nAir Traffic Control Tower project at the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport \nwas initiated in 2012.  \nIn 2013, a policy decision was taken to entrust the responsibility to Airports of \nMauritius Co. Ltd (AML) to implement the project on behalf of the Department of Civil \nAviation. However, it was only four years later, that is, in December 2017, that an open \ninternational bidding exercise was carried out by AML, through the Central Procurement \nBoard. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, at the closing date of 06 March 2018, three bids \nwere received as follows – \n(i) \nHyvec-Stefanutti Stocks JV; \n(ii) \nTianli Construction Company Ltd, and \n(iii) \nJV PADCO-ENDEM. \nOn 14 May 2018, the contract was awarded to JV PADCO-ENDEM, which was the \nlowest evaluated and substantially responsive bidder for the corrected sum of \nRs621,058,680.97 inclusive of VAT and excluding discounts of Rs18,114,862.99. However, \nthe COVID-19 pandemic confinement caused a stoppage of works as from 19 March to 02 \nJune 2020. Subsequently, JV PADCO-ENDEM went into voluntary administration on 07 July \n2020 and abandoned the work site. The initial contract was terminated on 17 December 2020.   \nIn June 2021, AML launched a selective bidding exercise for the conduct of an \nindependent valuation for the completion of the remaining construction works.  \nOn 26 October 2021, Chuttur & Partners Ltd, the successful bidder for the evaluation, \nsubmitted that the remaining works would cost around Rs827 million, exclusive of VAT. In \nother words, the original cost was around Rs621 million, Madam Speaker. Now they are \nsaying Rs827 million. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Voler! \nThe Prime Minister: That is, an increase of Rs206 million.  \nThe Board of AML approved on 29 December 2021 that a detailed bid be requested \nfrom Hyvec-Stefanutti Stocks JV, which was the next lowest bidder. The invitation to bid was \nissued on 03 February 2022 on a direct/emergency procurement basis. The closing date \n\n24 \n \ninitially set for 14 March 2022 for bid submission was extended twice up to 19 April 2022 on \nwhich date the bid was received. To give effect to this decision, on 19 July 2022, the Board of \nAML approved that AML would have recourse to emergency procurement for the completion \nof the project. \nIt should be pointed out, Madam Speaker, that the estimate was updated to around \nRs910 million in July 2022. In other words, an increase of Rs289 million now on the original \nof Rs621 million. The overall project value initially estimated at Rs790 million was then \nrevised to Rs1,296 billion inclusive of VAT and representing, Madam Speaker, an increase of \n64% on the original price, that is, an increase of Rs675 million. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Voler! \nThe Prime Minister: In other words, more than twice of the original price that was \ndecided. \nAn hon. Member: Voler! \nThe Prime Minister: Following consultation with the Procurement Policy Office and \nadvice from the Attorney General’s Office, AML was informed on 05 August 2022 by the \nExternal Communications Division of the Prime Minister’s Office that with regard to \nemergency procurement, it would have to comply with Section 21 of the Public Procurement \nAct, Regulation 5C of the Public Procurement Regulations 2008 as well as Directive 60 \nissued by the Procurement Policy Office. After apparently a thorough assessment and \nnumerous clarifications sought from the bidder, the bid was considered to be non-responsive. \nThe bidding exercise was cancelled in August 2022. \nTo bypass the provisions of the existing legislations, surprisingly, Madam Speaker, on \n21 December 2022, that is, roughly four months afterwards, the Public Procurement \n(Amendment of Schedule) (No. 4) Regulations 2022 were promulgated to exempt AML from \nthe application of the Public Procurement Act. Subsequently, AML resorted to its own \ninternal procurement procedures for the completion of the remaining works. \nGiven that the construction has been kept in abeyance and the existing infrastructure \nwas deteriorating, on 08 December 2023, the then Government agreed to Airport Holdings \nLtd contracting in part a bank loan and in part using its own funds to finance the completion \nof the project.  \n\n25 \n \nI am also informed, Madam Speaker, that AML launched a bidding exercise for the pre-\nqualification of contractors on 19 February 2024. Two applications were received, namely \nfrom Hyvec-Stefanutti Control Tower JV and JV of China State Construction Engineering \nCorporation Ltd & Nundun Gopee & Co Ltd.  The offer of Hyvec-Stefanutti Control Tower \nJV was retained for pre-qualification by AML’s Tender Committee. The pre-qualified bidder \nwas accordingly invited on 20 May 2024 to submit its bid by 26 June 2024. The bid \namounting to Rs 1,325,506,553.42, excluding VAT, was received from Hyvec-Stefanutti \nControl Tower JV. In other words, another increase of a bit more than Rs704 million on the \noriginal price quoted. Now, it is more than twice the amount. \nAs for part (b) of the question, I am informed that the overall completion of the project \nis around 35 per cent as of 17 December 2020. Since that date, no further works were \neffected. Today, we are faced, unfortunately, with a decrepit infrastructure whose completion \nwould entail additional public funds.  \nFurthermore, I am informed, Madam Speaker, that with regard to the evaluation of the \noffer of Hyvec-Stefanutti Control Tower JV for the completion of the project, on 17 February \n2025, AML’s Tender Committee recommended that its offer be deemed non-responsive as \nthe bid price exceeds the cost estimate by 45.81%.  \nAn amount of Rs322.2 million, excluding VAT, has already been disbursed by AML. \nWith regard to part (c) of the question, I am informed that once the contract is awarded, \nthe duration of the works would be around 19 months. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle! \nSAFE CITY PROJECT – CONTRACTORS & SUB-CONTRACTORS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-18-march-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/129",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 129,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/129) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Safe \nCity Project, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, \ninformation as to the – \n(a) \nname of the contractors and sub-contractors retained, if any, for the \nimplementation of this project, and \n(b) \nefficiency of the project in enhancing public safety, crime detection and \ncriminal accountability. \n\n26",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat, on 19 December 2017, a contract was signed between the Mauritius Police Force and \nMauritius Telecom for the sum of USD 466 million, that is, around Rs21 billion, for the \nimplementation of the Safe City Project. On 19 August 2019, the system came into operation \non an operating lease basis for a period of 20 years. \nThe Safe City Project comprises the following main components – \n(a) \n4,000 Intelligent Video Surveillance cameras; \n(b) \n300 Intelligent Traffic Surveillance cameras; \n(c) \n9 Convergent Command and Control Centres; \n(d) \nan Emergency Response Management System, and \n(e) \na Radio Communication System. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that the \nfollowing five companies have been sub-contracted by Mauritius Telecom, which is the main \ncontractor, for the implementation of the project – \n\nHuawei Technologies (Mauritius) Co. Ltd; \n\nTeleconvergence Infosystems Mauritius Ltd; \n\nRod Oto Ltd;  \n\nPowersure Ltd, and \n\nMEP Engineering Ltd. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, given the high cost of the project and though the \nsystem was designed supposedly for public safety and security, it is obvious that the \nutilisation of the system was well below expectations. Very often, the safe city cameras were \nused instead to track the movement of political opponents and spy on Mauritian citizens. \nThe House would also recall how in the process to elucidate certain atrocious crimes, \nsafe city cameras in specific areas were conveniently found defective and non-operational. \nThe case of late Kistnen is a good example. \nI am, thus, proposing that an independent assessment of the Safe City project be \nconducted in order to ensure first and foremost, the safety and security of the Mauritians and \nthe prompt elucidation of crimes and not to spy on Mauritian citizens. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \n\n27 \n \nMr Lobine: Thank you, Madam Speaker. With regard to those safe city cameras, may I \nask the hon. Prime Minister whether they are equipped with the facial recognition technology \nsoftware? \nThe Prime Minister: In fact, they are equipped with that technology, but it is not being \nused because it is in contravention with our data protection laws. \nMadam Speaker: Of course. Yes, hon. Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil! \nSMART CITY SCHEME – PROMOTERS – TAX EXEMPTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/130",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 130,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/130) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil)  asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Smart City \nScheme, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the total land surface \narea approved thereunder, indicating the total amount of exemptions granted to the Promoters \nthereof to date in terms of – \n(a) \nIncome tax; \n(b) \nValue Added Tax; \n(c) \nCustoms Duty; \n(d) \nLand Transfer tax, and \n(e) \nMorcellement tax.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Economic Development \nBoard that since the introduction of the Smart City Scheme in 2015, 19 projects have been \nissued with a Smart City Scheme certificate, out of which, 16 have started construction. I am \nfurther informed that the total aggregate land area for the 19 projects is 6,332 arpents. \nBased on the information submitted by the Mauritius Revenue Authority and the \nRegistrar-General’s Department, the amount of exemptions granted under the scheme as at \ndate in terms of Income Tax is Rs693 million, exemption for Value Added Tax is Rs5.8 \nbillion; Customs Duty exemption is Rs34.8 million, and Land Transfer Tax is Rs82.6 million. \nThat is a total of Rs6.61 billion of exemption! \nInsofar as the Morcellement Fee is concerned, the Morcellement Act is not applicable \nto an excision for the purpose of transfer of land to a Smart City project or a morcellement \nunder the Smart City Scheme. As such, no Morcellement Fee is collectible.  \nBut based on information provided by the Economic Development Board, it is broadly \nestimated that the total Morcellement Fee exempted would amount to some Rs373 million for \nthe 19 projects. \n\n28 \n \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Beechook: Can the hon. Prime Minister please inform the House if he has the \nfigures on the amount of exemption obtained under the land conversion tax? \nThe Prime Minister: I am not sure of the question, but the amount for the land transfer \ntax is Rs82.6 m. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, the hon. Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \nDRUGS CASES – ARRESTS & CHARGES (NOV 2024-MARCH 2025)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-18-march-2025",
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/131",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 131,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/131) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to proliferation of drugs in Mauritius, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \nthe Commissioner of Police, for the period 12 November 2024 to date, information as to the \nnumber of cases thereof reported to the Police, indicating the number of persons – \n(a) \narrested in relation thereto, and \n(b) \ncharged for drug related offences, indicating the number charged for – \n(i) \npossession; \n(ii) \ndrug dealing, and \n(iii) \ntrafficking.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat from Tuesday 12 November 2024 to Wednesday 12 March 2025, 1,076 drug cases have \nbeen reported to the Police. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, 942 persons have been arrested in connection \ntherewith. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am further informed that – \n\n460 persons have been charged for possession of dangerous drugs; \n\n433 persons have been charged for possession of dangerous drugs with an \naverment of drug dealing;  \n\n44 persons have been charged for possession of dangerous drugs with an \naverment of drug trafficking, and \n\n29 \n \n\nin the course of investigation of these drug cases, 4 persons have been charged \nfor money laundering and 1 person for perverting the course of justice. \nMadam Speaker, as stated in the Government Programme 2025-2029, the fight against \ndrug trafficking and use will be one of the major priorities of my Government through the \nprovision of additional resources to the Police to increase its capacity to deal more efficiently \nwith drug trafficking and related issues. \nIn addition, a National Agency for Drug Control, that is, the National Drug Policy \nMonitoring and Coordinating Agency is being set up and will be a central hub, bringing \ntogether various institutions to coordinate efforts in combating drug trafficking, providing \nrehabilitation services, and supporting families who are affected by substance abuse. \nMadam Speaker, I have already informed the House in my reply to PQ B/3 during the \nSitting of Tuesday 04 February of this year that Mr Sam Lauthan will be the Chairperson of \nthe Agency.   \nIn addition, Dr. Fayzal Sulliman will be the Chief Executive Officer of the Agency. He \nhas wide experience working with governments, NGOs in the field of substance abuse both \nlocally and in the African region. In fact, he has worked extensively with the United Nations \nOffice on Drugs and Crime until his retirement in 2022. \nA Bill has already been drafted for the establishment of the Agency and consultations \nare being held with stakeholders. As soon as this is over, the Bill will be introduced in the \nHouse. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \nMr A. Duval: Thank you. Madam Speaker, I am interested in drug dealing and \ntrafficking. These cases notoriously take a long time before being translated into a formal \ncharge, the main reason being the Forensic Science Laboratory taking such a long time \ndealing with so many cases. The second reason being the itemised bills, as we call them, call \nlogs and SMS logs also taking a long time. Will the hon. Prime Minister see to it urgently that \nthese two be revamped so that cases which now take, on average, five years to six years are \ndealt with swiftly? \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister! \nThe Prime Minister: The hon. Member is right. It is taking a long time, and the reason \nis the FSL is not doing the work it should be doing. I had brought in a foreign expert from \n\n30 \n \nScotland, if I remember correctly, who was here to advise, and she told me, ‘You will never \nget results the way the FSL is operating.’ They send people to court instead of doing their \nwork in the lab. When you need to send people to court, you have to send them, but not go \nthere day in, day out; wait for the case to be taken; it is postponed; come back to the lab. This \nis how it is being done. We are looking at this, I can assure the hon. Member, to correct this. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, second question. We have been promised a master plan \non drugs, including a Select Committee in the House, and I put the question to him. This had \nbeen promised; it has still not come to date. Can the hon. Prime Minister give us a time frame \nfor coming up with the setting up of a Select Committee, as well as with the master plan? \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister! \nThe Prime Minister: The law for the Agency, which I have just mentioned, is coming \nto Cabinet this Friday. It will be set up. \nMadam Speaker: Very good! Next question please, hon. First Member for La Caverne \nand Phoenix! \nMAURITIUS PRISON SERVICE – PRISON POPULATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/132",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 132,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/132) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the constant rise in \nthe prison population, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Prison Service, \ninformation as to the – \n(i) \nname of the actual Commissioner of Prisons; \n(ii) \nofficial capacity of the prison system, and  \n(iii) actual total prison population including pre-trial and remand detainees, and  \n(b) \nstate if he has been made aware of recent incidents occurring in the prisons due to \nthe overpopulation thereof and lack of staff, indicating the measures being taken \nto alleviate this problem.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to \ninform the House that, following the retirement of the Commissioner of Prisons on 08 \n\n31 \n \nDecember 2024, Mr Raj Rughoobeer, the most senior Deputy Commissioner of Prisons, has \nbeen assigned the duties of Commissioner of Prisons as from 09 December 2024.  \nWith regard to part (a)(ii) of the question, I am informed by the Acting Commissioner \nof Prisons that, as at 13 March 2025, the official bed capacity of the prison system in \nMauritius is 3,744.  \nWith regard to part (a)(iii) of the question, I am further informed that, as at 13 March \n2025, the total prison population is 2,722, out of which 1,424 detainees have been convicted, \nand 1,298 detainees are on remand. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Acting Commissioner of \nPrisons that there is no overpopulation in general, as the prison is currently occupied at \n72.7% of its optimum capacity, out of which 52.31% of the prison population have been \nconvicted and 47.69% are on remand. I said generally because, however, at the Petit Verger \nPrison, which has a bed capacity of 308, it is presently accommodating 322 detainees. The \nsurplus of 14 detainees are being transferred to Grand River North West Prison and Richelieu \nOpen Prison. \nThe Women Prison, which has a capacity of 160, is presently accommodating 169 \ndetainees, and most of them are on remand. The surplus of nine detainees again, are being \ndirected to the Open Prison for Women.  \nI am further informed by the Acting Commissioner of Prisons that there has been no \nincident directly related to overpopulation in the prisons.  \nAs regards staffing, a Manpower Assessment Exercise has been carried out in July 2022 \nby the Manager Human Resources of the then Prime Minister’s Office. \nIt has recommended, amongst others, the creation of some 150 additional posts in the \ngrade of Prisons Officer/Senior Prisons Officer and 15 additional posts in the grade of \nWoman Prisons Officer/Senior Woman Prisons Officer. It has been recommended that it is \ndone in a phased-wise manner over a period of three financial years. These additional staffs \nwill be reinforcing the team responsible for the rehabilitation programme. \nA Committee was set up in September 2024 to look into the implementation of the \nrecommendations of the Manpower Assessment Exercise. We are currently reviewing the \nstaff situation in the Prison with a view to ensuring an optimal utilisation of manpower \nresources. \n\n32 \n \nMadam Speaker, the Prison Service is laying focus on rehabilitation of prisoners \nthrough various programmes, so that they can successfully reintegrate into their communities \nwithout re-offending, and become responsible and law-abiding citizens. \nMoreover, the Prison Service provides vocational training in different fields to \nempower the detainees to be employable following their release from prison. Some of the \ntrainings being offered are carried out in collaboration with the Mauritius Institute of Training \nand Development. I am informed that a total of 402 detainees have followed such trainings \nduring the year 2024. Furthermore, Non-Governmental Organisations also provide \ncounselling, psycho-social support and life-skills programmes amongst the detainees. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, the hon. Second Member for Savanne and Black River! \nDBM – SURINAM INDUSTRIAL BUILDING – MANAGEMENT & OPERATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/133",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 133,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/133) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nSurinam Industrial Building situated at Souillac Cemetery Road, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to – \n (a) which department had the responsibility for the management thereof from 2014 to \ndate, and  \n(b) \nwhether it is currently operational, indicating the – \n(i) \nmaintenance costs thereof, and  \n(ii) \ntotal payments effected therefor to date.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Development Bank of \nMauritius that there are actually two buildings at Souillac Cemetery Road. \nOne building has two floors with a gross covered area of around 2,880 square metres.  \nThe other building also has two floors with a gross covered area of around 1,858 square \nmetres, and its construction is not fully completed.  Both buildings are on leasehold State \nland. \nRegarding part (a) of the question, the DBM has been managing the buildings since \nAugust 2019. On 16 August 2019, the DBM purchased the buildings from Aquaplast Ltd \nwhich went into receivership in January 2017. \n\n33 \n \nRegarding part (b) of the question, I am informed by the DBM that the buildings are \ncurrently not operational.   \nSince acquisition in August 2019 to date, total maintenance costs amounted to \nRs848,200 and total payments amounted to Rs 24,787,580.  The total payments comprise the \npurchase price, the rent for State land, security services, utilities, insurance costs, \nmaintenance costs, and other expenses. \nMadam Speaker, this is yet another blatant example of wastage of public funds. I have \ngiven directives for an audit of all DBM buildings to be done, so that unutilised spaces could \nbe made more profitable and rented to needy small entrepreneurs if they want. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES – EXTENDED CONTINENTAL SHELF – CLAIM",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/134",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 134,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/134) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Claim for \nExtended Continental Shelf in the region of Rodrigues Island, he will state where matters \nstand, indicating if all marine scientific research therefor have been concluded and, if so, \ntable copy of the report, if any.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, this question would be very, very long to \nanswer. I am proposing to tabling the information.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Hon. Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue, Mr A. Duval! \n PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE – MANDATE – PROPOSED BROADENING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-18-march-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/135",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 135,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/135) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the proposed broadening of the mandate of the Public Accounts Committee, he will \nstate where matters stand, giving details thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, as it has been clearly spelt out under the \nheading “Restoring Sound Macroeconomic Fundamentals” in the Government Programme \n2025-2029, Government will broaden the mandate of the Public Accounts Committee and \n\n34 \n \nmake it mandatory for it to look into Annual Audit Reports with the Accounting Officer in \nattendance. \nWe will also ensure that the Report of the Director of Audit is debated in the National \nAssembly and it is submitted to relevant institutions for investigation, where appropriate. \nIn view of your Announcement this morning, Madam Speaker, all this will be discussed \nin the appropriate Standing Committees. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \nMr A. Duval: Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker, four months have gone by and you are talking about… \nMadam Speaker: I can’t hear you. \nMr A. Duval: Four months have gone by and you are talking about increasing the \nmandate of the Public Accounts Committee.  The budget is coming soon, but there is still no \nPublic Accounts Committee. So, can we know… \nMadam Speaker: Don’t worry, it is coming! It’s coming! \nMr A. Duval: My question is: the previous regime had done it two weeks after the \nelection; why, in this case, is it taking so long? \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: There is no need to answer, hon. Prime Minister. I mentioned this \nmorning… \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Member, I mentioned this morning that the Select Committee, on which you will \nbe sitting, will be meeting soon. So, we will be starting committee work very soon. Don’t \nworry! \nOkay, hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière, Mr Quirin! \nST FELIX PUBLIC BEACH – ALLEGED ASSAULT CASE – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/136",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 136,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/136) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to an \n\n35 \n \nalleged case of assault on a group of persons on Sunday morning of 09 March 2025 at the St \nFelix Public Beach, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of \nPolice, information as to where matters stand as to the Police inquiry initiated thereinto, \nindicating if any arrest has been effected in connection therewith to date and if not, why not.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat at around 01 20 hours on Sunday 09 March 2025 at Chemin Grenier Police Station, Mr J. \nF. and his father Mr J. F. too requested for Police assistance as their relative and friend were \nbeing assaulted at St Felix Public Beach. Upon reaching St Felix Public Beach at around 01 \n30 hours, Police found Mr A. F. and Mr J. M. D. L. seriously injured. They were conveyed to \nSouillac Hospital where they were both examined by a Government Medical Officer. The \ninjured persons were subsequently conveyed to Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital for further \ntreatment. Police could not record their statements immediately as they were injured and were \nreceiving treatment. However, Police recorded the statement of Mr J. M. D. L. at 15 45 hours \nand that of Mr A. F. at 15 50 hours on the same day. \nIn his statement, Mr J. M. D. L. affirmed that – \n(i) \nhe, along with three persons had proceeded to St Felix Public Beach on \nSaturday 08 March 2025 at 22 00 hours, for a prayer session; \n(ii) \non Sunday 09 March 2025, at around one o’clock, during the prayer session, a \ngroup of persons assaulted them with offensive weapons; \n(iii) \nthe persons claimed that Mr J. M. D. L. and his congregation were dealing with \nwitchcraft; and \n(iv) \nthe persons took two gold chains and a sum of Rs400 which belonged to him. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed by the Commissioner of Police that, on Monday \n10 March 2025, one Mr M. R. J. and one Mr  M. Z. I., both residing at Chemin Grenier, \nvoluntarily called at Chemin Grenier Police Station, accompanied by their lawyers, to \nsurrender themselves in connection with the incident. While being interviewed by the Police, \nthey opted to keep their right of silence. The two persons were arrested on the same day. On \nTuesday 11 March 2025, they were provisionally charged for “larceny with violence” before \nthe District Court of Savanne. The Police objected to their release on bail and they were \nremanded to Police cell up to Monday 17 March 2025, that is, yesterday, date on which the \nMagistrate of the District Court postponed the hearing to Thursday 20 March 2025. \n\n36 \n \nOn Saturday 15 March 2025, Mr J. M. D. L. gave a further statement to the Police and \nhe identified Mr M. H. A. B. as being the person who assaulted him and stole his golden \nchains and the sum of Rs400. \nOn Monday 17 March 2025, Mr M. H. A. B. was provisionally charged for “larceny \nwith violence” before the District Court of Savanne in relation to the incident which occurred \non 09 March 2025 at the public beach. \nThe three persons were remanded to Police cell up to Friday 21 March 2025, pending \ntheir hearing on bail on Thursday 20 March 2025. \nEnquiry is still going on in the case. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. Au vu du témoignage d’une des personnes \nagressées, un pasteur de surcroît, le Premier ministre peut-il dire à la Chambre s’il y a eu une \npossible complicité entre les agresseurs et certains policiers ce matin-là, car il faut bien le \ndire, à leur arrivée sur le lieu de l’agression, les policiers étaient, semble-t-il, très amicaux \navec les agresseurs et, deuxièmement, il y avait réticence à enregistrer la déposition du \npasteur dans son intégralité ? \nThe Prime Minister: I am not aware of this. The Police enquiry is still ongoing. I am \nsure we will find out about this. \nMadam Speaker: Of course! Yes! \nMrs Savabaddy: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Is the hon. Prime Minister aware that \nthugs, vagabonds proches de l’ancien régime, close to a former senior Minister, to the MSM \nwere involved in that assault… \nMadam Speaker: I am sorry, I didn’t hear anything of what you are saying. Are you \non this question? \nMrs Savabaddy: Yes. \nMadam Speaker: Same public beach? \nMrs Savabaddy: I am, yes. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Speak out! \n\n37 \n \nMrs Savabaddy: Okay. Is the hon. Prime Minister aware that thugs, I mean vagabonds \nproches de l’ancien régime, close to a former senior Minister, to the MSM, were involved in \nthat assault? Will the hon. Prime Minister agree with me that we need stiffer penalties for \nthose who play with our social and religious fabric? Thank you. \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, I tend to agree that we have to have tough penalties. I am \naware a bit, but I do not want into a police enquiry which is going on. \nMadam Speaker: Exactly! Yes, last question! I am sorry, time is almost up. \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. Donc, ce n’est pas la première fois que des \npersonnes se font agresser à cause de leurs croyances religieuses. Le Premier ministre \ncompte-t-il prendre des actions pour s’assurer que tous les Mauriciens soient libres de \npratiquer leur religion, et si oui, quelles sont ces actions ? \nThe Prime Minister: Certainly. We have already said that many times, nous serons \nintransigeants avec ceux qui veulent déstabiliser notre pays. We are going to look at all the \nlaws that are here; we are probably going to stiffen them. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Time is up! I am sorry, hon. Members, I have to inform \nyou that the Table has been advised that the following PQs have been withdrawn: B/139, \nB/140, B/141, and B/143.  \nNow we move to questions to Ministers! I call on the hon. First Member for Rodrigues, \nMs Collet! \n29TH VOLLEYBALL CHAMPIONSHIP – ZONE 7 REGION – OUTCOME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-18-march-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/137",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 137,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/137) Dr. Ms. B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to pilots \nemployed by Air Mauritius Ltd., he will – \n(a)  state if consideration will be given for an investigation to be carried out on the \nworking conditions thereof, and  \n(b)  for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom information as to the measures \nbeing envisaged to ensure that the working conditions of foreign and Mauritian \npilots, employed by the company, are at par and in line with international \nworking standards.",
      "answer": "Reply: As I have stated before, transparency and accountability will underpin all \nactions of this Government. \nIn this respect, contrary to the previous government, I have decided to reply to all \nquestions pertaining to State-Owned Enterprises. \nIt would be apposite to briefly mention the legacy of rot that the previous government \nhas gifted to Air Mauritius. \nThe new Chairman of Air Mauritius Ltd explained at a press conference, on Friday 14 \nMarch 2025, how over the last 10 years, through mismanagement, ineptitude, malfeasance \nand cronyism, the company has been brought to bankruptcy. \n“Lakwizinn” through its bunch of notorious toadies, including an equally notorious \nReceiver Manager, has overseen the downfall of a company that used to be the pride of our \nNation. \nToday, Air Mauritius Ltd is not in a High Dependency Unit! As a former cadre \naccurately said, “It is in ICU!”. It is literally in a comatose state teetering on the brink of \ndisappearance! \nThe management has already initiated action for a thorough forensic audit to find out \nwho were those responsible for this debacle. \n\n170 \n \nLet it be said loud and clear that every single individual responsible for this state of \naffairs will be held personally liable! \nThe new management is facing the mammoth task of putting order in this anarchic \nchaos. Government fully understands the repressive actions meted out to the majority of the \nstaff. We need to give time to management to improve the disastrous situation they have \ninherited. I am informed that they are doing their utmost to ensure that the staff operates \nunder the best possible conditions under the prevailing circumstances. \nI am informed by Air Mauritius Ltd that the working conditions of pilots, both foreign \nand Mauritian, at Air Mauritius meet local and international regulatory standards. The \nemployment of pilots by Air Mauritius Ltd is regulated under the Mauritius Civil Aviation \nRegulations and the Air Operator Certificate Requirements for the Air Operators Certificate \nissuance. However, representations have been made regarding working conditions of pilots \nand I understand that these are being looked into. \nI am further informed that Air Mauritius Ltd is in the process of engaging an \nInternational Airline Consulting body to relook at the overall organization of its Flight \nOperations Department with a view to ensuring that Air Mauritius Ltd has the best practices \nin relation to pilot, security, training, recruitment, retention and career path.  \nMOTORWAY M3 – ILLEGAL MOTORCYCLE RALLIES – REMEDIAL \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-18-march-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/138",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 138,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/138) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to illegal motorcycle rallies on motorway M3, particularly from the Terre Rouge and \nMamezelle Laure roundabout, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the urgent remedial measures being envisaged in \nrelation thereto.",
      "answer": "Reply: Under section 125 of the Road Traffic Act, a person who promotes or takes part \nin motor races on a road, should obtain the consent of the Commissioner of Police.  \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Police that each year about 10 applications for \nracing events for both motorcycles and motor cars from registered organisations are received. \nThese applications are assessed, based on the eligibility criteria of participants, safety \nconcerns, and the suitability of the location where the rally would be held. After consultations \n\n171 \n \nwith relevant Ministries and Departments and in case all the conditions are met, the Police \nauthorises the holding of these rallies.  The rallies are commonly held at La Nicolière, the \nparking of Anjalay Stadium, Plaine Champagne, Chamarel and even in Port Louis. \nUnfortunately, it has been observed that motor races and rallies involving both motor \ncars and motorcycles are being held in certain locations illegally, usually after midnight, \nwithout the consent of the Police.  The Police receives every year around 50 complaints from \nmembers of the public relating to speeding and noise caused by illegal rallies and races. \nI am further informed by the Commissioner of Police that, in order to curb the holding \nof illegal rallies and motor racing all over the island, including on motorway M3, the local \nPolice regularly puts in place special deployments through vehicular patrols, vehicle check \npoints and targeted operations in hot spots. The existing Police deployment has been \nreinforced with the involvement of the Special Mobile Force and the Special Supporting Unit \nfor increased patrols and Police presence at targeted areas. Moreover, the public is \ncontinuously being sensitised on the dangers of illegal racing. \nTo reinforce control over such activities, amendments are being envisaged to the \nexisting legislation so as to strengthen provisions to deter the holding of illegal rallies and \nmotor racing. The proposed amendments will include higher fines and disqualification of \ndriving licences for illegal road racing, including terms of imprisonment and also the use of \ntechnology such as drones and Safe City Cameras for better detection of illegal racing. \nMotor rallies and racing are popular sports activities worldwide and there is growing \ninterest in these activities in Mauritius as well. With a view to ensuring the safety and \nsecurity of participants and spectators, a dedicated space with the proper infrastructure for the \nconduct of such rallies and races is desirable.  \n In this connection, I am informed by the Ministry of Youth and Sports that, a \npreliminary study to explore the need for the setting up of a Rally Circuit in Mauritius, was \ncarried out in the year 2022. The study has recommended that a Specialist Consultant be \nappointed to assess the feasibility of the project. Unfortunately, there were no follow-up \nactions. \nThe Ministry of Youth and Sports has been requested to reconsider the hiring of the \nservices of a consultant to assess the feasibility of setting up, in Mauritius, a dedicated rally \ntrack within all the legal framework and with the required safety features. Illegal motor rallies \nnot only endanger the lives of participants, but also of innocent bystanders. It also causes \n\n172 \n \nenvironmental damage, and disrupt public order. By providing proper facilities with sufficient \nsecurity and clear regulations, we can channel the passion for motorsports into safe, \norganised sports events that benefit both the participants and the community at large. \n \nPUBLIC BEACHES – INCIDENTS – LAW MAINTENANCE MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/139",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 139,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/139) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to recent incidents on members of the public at public beaches, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the – \n(a) number of reported cases thereof since 11 November 2024 to date, indicating the \nnumber of – \n(i)  \ncases resulting in physical injury, including deaths; \n(ii)  cases involving sexual abuse;  \n(iii)  incidents involving minors, and \n(iv)  persons provisionally charged in relation thereto, and  \n(b) measures being proposed to maintain law and order on public beaches.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nDEPUTY PERMANENT SECRETARIES –RECRUITMENT EXERCISE 2023",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/140",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 140,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/140) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nrecruitment exercise for the post of Deputy Permanent Secretaries, advertised in 2023, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number thereof recruited.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nGOODLANDS POLICE STATION – POLICE OFFICERS & VEHICLES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/141",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 141,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/141) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nGoodlands Police Station, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to – \n\n173 \n \n(a) the number of – \n(i)  \nPolice Officers posted thereat, indicating their respective rankings, and  \n(ii)  vehicles assigned thereto, and \n (b) the measures being envisaged, if any, to increase the manpower thereat for more \neffective policing within its jurisdiction.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nDRIVING LICENCES – SMART CARD FORMAT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/142",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 142,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/142) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to driving \nlicences, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, \ninformation as to whether there is any project to convert the current one to a smart card \nformat and, if so, indicate the – \n(a) cost of the project; \n(b) number of licenses concerned, and \n(c) scheduled timeframe therefor.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that, as far back as April 2008, a \nleading consulting firm, namely De Chazal Du Mée (DCDM), was commissioned to assess \nthe requirements of the Traffic Branch with a view to digitalising its service delivery system, \nincluding the conversion of the paper-based driving licence into a smart card format. \nFollowing the report of the DCDM, the Central Informatics Bureau (CIB) started to \nwork on the specifications for the establishment, in the first instance, of an Integrated Driving \nLicence Management System, comprising a database of all driving licence holders. This is \noperational since March 2013. The system also incorporated the Penalty Point System \nintroduced by my Government, which was fully functional and was reaping conclusive \nresults.   \nHowever, in 2015, the decision was taken to replace the Penalty Point System by a \nCumulative Road Traffic Offences System, which have proved to be a complete failure. This \nhad required the modification of the IT infrastructure of the Traffic Branch, thus further \n\n174 \n \ndelaying the phase-wise implementation of the project for the conversion of the paper-based \nDriving Licence into a Smart Card format. \nWith the implementation of the new National Identity Card (MNIC 3.0) as from 2023, \ndiscussions were held between the technical team of the Central Informatics Bureau, the \nTraffic Branch of the Police Force and other stakeholders, with the supplier of the MNIC 3.0 \nsystem, to explore the possibility of including a digital format of the driving licence in the \nsame software application hosting the mobile identity card. However, the proposal submitted \nby the supplier was not found to be acceptable due to its exorbitantly high cost. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that the Ministry of Information \nTechnology, Communication and Innovation along with the Police Department and other \nrelevant stakeholders, are still having broad consultations to come up with a cost estimate of \nthe final project in line with the updated specifications which are being worked by the Central \nInformatics Bureau. The conduct of a market survey and a competitive tender exercise are \nunder consideration for a more cost-effective implementation of the digital driving licence \nproject. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I have been informed that the current driving \nlicence database covers approximately 887,899 driving licences, including all categories of \ndrivers.  \nConcerning part (c) of the question, I am informed that a tentative implementation \ntimeline for the conversion of the paper-based driving licence into a digital format can only \nbe known upon the completion of the ongoing consultations and the expected timeline for the \ntendering processes are known. \nCOCAINE DISCOVERY – TRACTOPELLE’S ENGINE – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-18-march-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/143",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 143,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/143) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the 95 kgs of cocaine discovered in the engine of a tractopelle in July 2019, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to \nwhere matters stand as to the inquiry initiated thereinto, indicating the number of arrests \neffected, if any, in connection therewith to date.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n\n175 \n \n \nMETRO EXPRESS PROJECT PHASE 3 – FEASIBILITY STUDY – PROJECT COST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/144",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 144,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/144) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nYouth and Sports whether, in regard to the 29th Volleyball Championship for Zone VII region \nheld from 01 to 08 March 2025 in Mauritius, he will state the outcomes thereof, indicating – \n(a) \nthe level of participation in the event, and  \n(b) \nhow it has contributed to the promotion of sports and youth development in the \nRepublic.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the Confederation Africaine de \nVolleyball Zone 7 entrusted the Mauritius Volleyball Federation with the responsibility to \nhost the 29th edition of the Volleyball Clubs Championship for the Zone 7 region which was \nheld from 01 to 08 March 2025. The competition sites were – \n \n\n38 \n \n1. Pandit Sahadeo Gymnasium, Vacoas; \n2. Le Quorum Gymnasium, Plaisance Rose-Hill, and \n3. The University of Mauritius Gymnasium. \nIt is a yearly regional competition of teams from the Zone 7 region. The members of \nZone 7 are Reunion, Madagascar, Seychelles, Mayotte, Comoros and Mauritius.  \nRegarding part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the House that 29 Teams, that is, 14 \nMen’s teams and 15 Women’s teams, participated in the competition. The breakdown of \nparticipation by country is as follows – \n1. \nReunion: \n \n \n4 Men’s Teams \n4 Women’s Teams \n2. \nMadagascar:  \n \n1 Men’s Teams \n2 Women’s Teams \n3. \nSeychelles: \n \n \n1 Men’s Teams  \n2 Women’s Teams \n4. \nMayotte:  \n \n \n3 Men’s Teams  \n1 Women’s Teams \n5. \nMauritius (incl. Rodrigues) \n5 Men’s Teams \n6 Women’s Teams \nThe Championship is a Pool cum League tournament where the 2 best teams of each \ngroup go to Quarter Finals, Semi Finals and Finals. Country members may send 2 to 4 teams \nand club champions of respective countries to participate in the competition. Reunion won \nthe tournament and it is an honour for a team from Rodrigues to have reached the semi-finals. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, the competition has been \nbeneficial to all participating teams as it has largely contributed to sportsmen to have access \nto international exposure. Furthermore, the influx of foreigners has enabled to showcase \nMauritius as a sporting destination. In addition, the competition attracted large number of \nspectators in our gymnasiums. The event also created a keen interest in the public as \nwitnessed by the enthusiasm shown by youth and trainees from local volleyball academies \nwho were given the opportunity to serve as volunteers during the competition. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMs Collet: I have one supplementary question. I thank the hon. Minister for his \nanswers. Madam Speaker, will the hon. Minister indicate whether his Ministry would be \nwilling to consider Rodrigues as participant in the African Volleyball Clubs Championship? \nMr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, the 2025 African Men's Volleyball Championship \nwill take place in Libya from 17 to 30 April 2025, while that of women, will take place in \n\n39 \n \nNigeria. Any request for financial assistance from the Rodrigues Oranges Club Sportif \nd’Amitié will have to be examined by the Ministry. Besides, funds are provided by the \nCentral Government to the Rodrigues Regional Assembly for various sectors as listed in the \nFourth Schedule of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act. The Fourth Schedule lists youth \nand sports as one of their areas of responsibility to be exercised by the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Quirin! \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. L’honorable ministre, peut-il dire à la \nChambre quelle a été la contribution de son ministère en ce qui concerne l’organisation de \ncette compétition ? \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister! \nMr Nagalingum: My Ministry has provided different facilities as regard to transport \nand other area of facilities as to what the Federation has asked. The Ministry has provided the \nfacilities. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! Hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre \nBornes! \nLA SOURCE FOOTBALL PLAYGROUND – OPERATIONALITY & SAFETY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/145",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 145,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/145) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to La Source Football \nplayground, he will state – \n(a)  if he has been made aware of – \n(i)  \nthe non-compliance thereof to be classified as a football field, and  \n(ii)  the construction of a concrete barrier at the playground, and  \n(b)  the measures being envisaged for the safety of the players thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Thank you. Madam Speaker, I have been informed by the Municipal \nCouncil of Quatre Bornes (MCQB) that the La Source Football Playground was originally \nequipped with sports facilities, including a football playground, a gradin and cloakrooms.  \nAccording to the Municipal Council, FIFA recommends that a standard football field \nshould be 105 meters long and 68 meters wide. However, in December 2022, the National \n\n40 \n \nDevelopment Unit (NDU), under the previous government, began upgrading works on the \nplayground. These works mainly involved improving the football pitch and creating a jogging \ntrack.  As part of this project, the NDU and its contractor installed concrete kerbs around the \nplaying area, reducing the field length to only 61 meters.  As a result, the football ground is \nno longer in compliance with FIFA standards. \nAnother major concern is the safety of the players. In February 2023, the Municipal \nCouncil received a petition from football players, coaches and ‘Ecole de Foot’ highlighting \nthe risk posed by the concrete kerbs. The Council then informed the NDU about this safety \nissue.  \nDespite these requests, the NDU continued with the installation of the concrete kerbs, \nplacing them only 2.8 metres behind the goal post and all around the field and the jogging \ntrack. \nMadam Speaker, on 08 August 2024, a meeting was held under the chairpersonship of \nthe Mayor of Quatre Bornes with representatives from the NDU. During this meeting, the \nCouncil once again requested the removal of the kerbs and the installation of a proper water \ndrainage system around the football field. However, no action has been taken so far. This \nsituation clearly demonstrates how the previous government has failed in the planning and \nexecuting projects. Their poor designs have not only resulted in football fields that do not \nmeet regulations, but also put our players at risk.  \nTo address these issues, my Ministry sent two official letters to the NDU on 30 \nDecember 2024 and on 16 January 2025, requesting urgent remedial works. My Ministry is \nclosely monitoring the situation in coordination with the Ministry of National Infrastructure. \nMadam Speaker, I have also been informed that the cloakroom and the toilets at La \nSource Football Playground were not upgraded by the NDU and are currently unusable due to \nthe needs of major repairs.   \nTo resolve this, the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes has put forward proposals to \ncarry out the necessary works using its in-house labour. \nAdditionally, at its Public Infrastructure Committee meeting on 14 February 2025, the \nCouncil decided to remove all concrete kerbs and restore the playground exclusively for \nfootball.   \n\n41 \n \nFurthermore, the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes requested the NDU to officially \nhand over the project site to allow works to begin as soon as possible. The handover of La \nSource Football Ground was completed on Friday 14 March 2025. Also, I wish to inform the \nhon. Member that these works started today itself and are expected to be completed by the \nend of this month. The cost of Rs500,000 for the repairs will be covered under the Small \nCommunity Projects Fund. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, one supplementary! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Dans sa réponse, le ministre \névoque une allocation de R 500 000 afin de corriger ce projet bidon, bancal et dangereux de \nl’ancien régime. Au nom des habitants de La Source, je le remercie. Le ministre, peut-il \nconfirmer à la Chambre si la compagnie KJMC Contractor Ltd qui entretient des relations, \ndes liens très, très étroits avec l’ancienne PPS Diolle, est bien responsable de la construction \nde cette structure en béton sur ce terrain de foot au coût de plus d’un million ? Je vous \nremercie, Madame la présidente.   \nAn hon. Member: Diolle ! \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister! \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker,… \nMadam Speaker: You just have to confirm or not confirm! \nMr Woochit: The contract of the project was allocated by the NDU. So, I will advise \nthe hon. Member if she could direct this question to NDU for a comprehensive response as \nthe contract was allocated by the NDU. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Hon. Members,… \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Chief Whip, I am trying to talk!  \nHon. Members, the Table has been advised that PQ B/192 will be replied by the hon. \nMinister of National Infrastructure. PQs B/148 and B/189 have been withdrawn.  \nNext question, and then we will end. Hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River! \n \n\n42 \n \nFLIC-EN-FLAC COASTAL ROAD-TAMARINA ROAD – ACCESIBILITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-18-march-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/146",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 146,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/146) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to road safety, he will state if \nconsideration will be given for the opening, as a matter of urgency and public interest, of the \nconnecting road from Flic-en-Flac coastal road to Tamarina road.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, the Flic-en-Flac B34 Road starts at Cascavelle and ends \nat Wolmar. Presently, the Flic-en-Flac village is accessible through this single road, limiting \nentry and exit options.  \nI am informed that the Road Development Authority is presently undertaking the \nconstruction of a new road extending from La Vigie to Flic-en-Flac near Xavier.  \nI wish to inform the House that upon assuming office, I queried as to why the road does \nnot connect till Flic-en-Flac village. I am pleased to announce that due to savings on the \nexisting project, as a result of an optimisation in the design of an initial 72 meters long bridge \nover River Rempart near Beaux Songes into a hydraulic tunnel of 10.5 meters by 8 meters \nculvert, the project will now extend till the Flic-en-Flac Coastal Road near the Cemetery. This \nnew link is scheduled to be completed by September 2025. \nAs a continuation of this project and with a view to providing a connection to the Flic-\nen-Flac Coastal Road, I carried out a site visit on 05 February 2025 with elected Members of \nthe Constituency and officers of the RDA who explored possible options to connect the \nvillage of Wolmar to Tamarin.  \nDuring the site visit, it was noted that a private road of a stretch of 1.3 km already \nexists and serves the Tamarina Golf project. I was astonished to see that no proper survey \nwas carried out so far to open that road but I came to know that the road is aside a famous \nhotel which we all know belongs to whom. \nMadam Speaker, the RDA has accordingly been tasked to work on a technical proposal \nto extend the existing private road to connect the Flic-en-Flac B34 Road to the Black River \nA3 Road over a total length of 2.6 km.  \nCurrently, the RDA is assessing the extent of land required for the proposed link road \nfrom Wolmar to Tamarin. Once this assessment is completed, further discussions will be held \nwith Medine Limited regarding the modalities and cost implications associated with land \nacquisition and the project. \n\n43 \n \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka! \nCOTE D’OR NATIONAL SPORTS COMPLEX – PUBLIC ACCESSIBILITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-18-march-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/147",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 147,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/147) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Cote D’Or National Sports \ncomplex, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Multisports \nInfrastructure Ltd., information as to the number of people currently accessing and making \nuse thereof for both professional and non-professional sports activities on a monthly basis, \nindicating the measures being envisaged to render the complex more accessible to the public.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I am tabling the information \nas provided by the Mauritius Multisports Infrastructure Limited. \nI wish to inform the House that for the period July 2024 to February 2025, on average, \nsome 14,000 people have been making use of the sports complex for sports activities on a \nmonthly basis, among which 3,100 were sports professionals and 11,000 were non-sports \nprofessionals. \nAs regard to the second part of the question, the prices for community activities and \nbooking of facilities have been kept below market rates at the Côte D’Or Sports complex to \nallow an even greater number of people to benefit from this facility. Furthermore, I have \ngiven instructions to the newly constituted Board of Directors to work on a turnaround plan, \nincluding devising ways and means to make the site more accessible to the public for the \npractice of sports and physical activities. The introduction of new sports discipline is also \nbeing envisaged. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nDr. Ms Thannoo: Madam Speaker, can we actually have the Ministry require or \nrequest the erection of a bus stop for local people to access the complex please? \nMr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, the Ministry of Land Transport, was consulted and \nthe latter has informed that following a request from the senior administrator of the Côte \nD’Or National Sports complex, a shuttle bus service started on 15 January 2024 from St-\nPierre bus station to Côte D’Or National Sports complex via Helvetia by United Bus Service \nCompany Ltd to facilitate the conveyance of staff of the complex – approximatively, 125 – \nand other sport complex users. Three trips were performed in the morning, one during the day \nand two in the afternoon. Due to low ridership, UBS Company Ltd, ceased the service in \n\n44 \n \nApril 2024. Prior to the discontinuance of the service, a few surveys have been carried out by \nthe inspectorate which revealed a marginal flow of passengers along that corridor.  \nNevertheless, I will liaise with my colleague, the Minister of Land Transport, to look \ninto the matter.   \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Quirin! \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. L’honorable ministre est-il informé que \ncertains hauts cadres dans un passé récent, je veux dire juste avant les dernières élections \ngénérales, ont utilisé ce complexe à des fins personnelles – pour des anniversaires ou autres \nfêtes familiales – free of charge, et peut-on savoir quelles sont les mesures qu’a prises le \nnouveau conseil d’administration pour mettre fin à ces pratiques ? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Minister! \nMr Nagalingum: The hon. Member is right. Actually, we are conducting an enquiry \nabout this situation. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! At this stage, I suspend the Sitting for one and a half hour!  \nAt 12.58 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.32 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Members, I have been informed that B/152, B/156, B/161, \nB/180 have been withdrawn.  \nMr Rookny: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this was in case there was not enough time. But I \nhave not withdrawn my questions.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: This is what I have been informed by the Acting Clerk. So, I \nwill go according to the instruction given to me by the Acting Clerk of the National \nAssembly. \nSo, we now proceed with the PQs.  \nThe hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nICTA – SERVICES OF BARRISTERS – JAN 2015-JAN 2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/148",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 148,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/148) Dr. Ms.  R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation \nwhether, in regard to the Information and Communication Technologies Authority, he will, \n\n45 \n \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom information as to the number of barristers \nwhose services have been retained thereat since January 2015 to November 2024, indicating \nthe – \n(a) \nnumber of cases assigned, and  \n(b) \nlegal fees paid thereto, in each case.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nCANCER CARE ECOSYSTEM – CARE STANDARDS \n(No. B /149) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister \nof Health and Wellness whether, in regard to cancer care ecosystem for better care for all, he \nwill state the – \n (a) innovative policy and redefinition of care standards and meaningful change \nthereof, if any  \n(b) \npercentage of cancer death, and  \n(c) \nmost common type of cancer being diagnosed in the Republic of    Mauritius. \nMr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that my Ministry has \nadopted a comprehensive strategy to strengthening the cancer care ecosystem. This includes \nenhancing primary healthcare services, improving early detection, expanding access to \ntreatment and providing supportive care. \nThe National Cancer Centre inaugurated in 2024, is at the forefront of cancer care in \nthe country. This 200-bed-facility offers comprehensive services including radiotherapy, \nchemotherapy, imaging, surgery and palliative care. The centre provides modern radiotherapy \ntreatments such as 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and the installation of High Dose \nRate (HDR) brachytherapy is currently under way.  \nThe Radiology Unit is fully equipped with x-ray, CT scan, MRI, echography, cardiac \nimaging, thoracoscopy and mammography machines. Additionally, a Nuclear Medicine Unit \nhas been established with PET/CT and SPECT-CT equipment, with PET/CT awaiting \ncommissioning, that is, not yet operational.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, chemotherapy services are being delivered in a patient-friendly \nenvironment with approximately 70 patient receiving chemotherapy daily. Since 2025, \nchemotherapy services have been decentralised with the five regional hospital ensuring \n\n46 \n \ngreater access for patients across the country. Efforts are also in progress to approve and \nintroduce new chemotherapeutic agents to expand the range of available treatment options. \nIn the field of surgical oncology, the National Cancer Centre has fully equipped \noperating theatres with regular visits from foreign experts in the surgical oncology to enhance \nthe quality of care. The visits also serve in training of our health care professionals to identify \nearly signs of cancer allowing for timely referrals to specialists and improving the likelihood \nof successful treatment. In addition, basic laboratory investigations are available at the centre \nto support diagnosis and treatment decisions and the pharmacy operates until 22hrs daily to \nensure that patients have access to essential medications. \nThe hospital formulary is also regularly updated to include the latest chemotherapeutic \nagents ensuring that patients have access to the most effective treatment available. It is \nimportant to note that cancer prevention education has also been integrated into school \ncurriculum and community outreach programmes are being carried out to raise awareness, \nreduce stigma and encourage early intervention. As part of prevention strategy, the Human \nPapillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Programme for boys and girls aged 9 to 14 years is being \nprioritised. \nFurthermore, nationwide screening programmes such as Caravane de santé initiative \nare being rolled out to promote early detection of cancers like breast and cervical cancer. \nHealth professionals are conducting regular mammography sessions and clinical \nexaminations to ensure that cancers are identified at an early stage leading to better treatment \noutcomes. My Ministry has also taken significant steps to improve palliative and \npsychosocial care including mental health counselling for cancer patients. \nIn addition to hospital based palliative care, home-based care models are being \nenvisaged with the aim to alleviate the burden on hospitals and provide patients with comfort \nof receiving care at home. This integrated approach reflects the Government’s commitment to \nproviding comprehensive cancer care, from prevention and early detection to treatment and \nsupport ensuring that every individual has access to high quality care throughout their cancer \njourney. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that \naccording to National Cancer Registry Report 2023, cancer accounted for 13.1% of all deaths \nin the Republic of Mauritius.  \n\n47 \n \nWith regard to part (c) of the question, I am informed that the five most common cancer \nsites in Mauritius for men are – \n(i) \nProstate; \n(ii) \nColorectal; \n(iii) \nLung; \n(iv) \nMouth, and \n(v) \nPharynx and stomach. \nI am further informed that for women the five most common cancer sites are – \n(i) \nBreast; \n(ii) \nColorectal; \n(iii) \nCorpus uteri; \n(iv) \nOvary, and \n(v) \nCervix uteri. \nMr François: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. I thank the hon. Minister for his \nanswer. Well, we are not doctors. May I ask the hon. Minister whether his Ministry is \nplanning to implement over-advanced diagnostics for cancer like using AI or molecular \ndiagnostic? \nMr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we have just started and I can assure the hon. \nMember that everything is being done to make use of the most modern sophisticated \nequipment which may be available outside Mauritius. \nMr François: Just a last supplementary. Is there any statistics on the survival rates for \ncancer patient in our Republic? \nMr Bachoo: I do not have that information with me right now. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue!  \nPUBLIC SCHOOLS – AUTISTIC CHILDREN – FACILITIES PROVIDED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/149",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 149,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness – \n \nWhether, in regard to cancer care ecosystem for better care \nfor all, he will state the (a) innovative policy and redefinition \nof care standards and meaningful change thereof, if any (b) \npercentage of cancer death and (c) most common type of \ncancer being diagnosed in the Republic of Mauritius?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/150",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 150,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/150) Mr A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to children \nwith Autism, he will state the facilities provided thereto in public schools, indicating the – \n\n48 \n \n(a) \nage group thereof; \n(b) \nlogistic support provided to these children, indicating the conveyance facilities \nput in place, if any, and \n(c) \nnumber of specialized institutions catering for same, giving details thereof.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to thank the hon. First \nMember for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue for this question. I wish to inform the \nHouse that presently, there a 64 public schools in Mauritius that provide facilities to some \n225 children with autism.  \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that the 225 children with autism \nwho attend these 64 public schools are between the age of 5 years to 20 years old.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that the \nlogistics supports that are being provided to children with special needs including children \nwith autism are as follows – \n(i) \nPayments of grants and aids to NGOs and RCEAs registered with the Special \nEducation Needs Authority (SENA) to cover the following items – \n(a) \nSalary of managers, teachers, assistant teachers, carers, handy workers \nand drivers; \n(b) \nPer capita expenditure which includes basic grant, teaching aids and \nother school requirement, utilities, furniture and equipment for specialist \nsupport services; \n(c) \nHot meals, and \n(d) \nSpecial support services, occupational, speech and physiotherapists on \nsessional basis. \n(ii) \nTransport facilities for the pick-up and drop-off of the children are provided by \nmy Ministry, free of charge for those attending the SENRDCs. Children \nattending the SENIUs are given free bus pass to attend school. Refund of bus \nfares is also provided by the Ministry of Social Integration, Social Security and \nNational Solidarity to parents who accompany their children to specialised \nschools, integrated units and main stream schools; \n\n49 \n \n(iii) \nProvision of occupational speech and physiotherapy services to children who \nattend the SENIU, SENRDC primary and secondary schools; \n(iv) \nProvision of ICT classes and the Sankoré Programme, and \n(v) \nChildren with severe autism and orthopaedic impairments are entitled to 100% \nexcise duty concession on motor vehicle by the Ministry of Social Integration, \nSocial Security and National Solidarity. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, allow me to pay tribute to one and all who are daily involved \nand looking after our children with autism, be it at home or at schools. With your permission, \nI am tabling details of the specialised institutions, NGOs, SENRDC, SENIU and RCEA \ncatering for children with autism in Mauritius. \nAs regards to children with autism who attend public primary and secondary schools, \nthey are accommodated in the main stream inclusive setup and are provided with the services \nof assistant teachers and carers for their daily learning support and living skills respectively. \nThank you. \nMrs Savabaddy: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Will the hon. Minister state the \ncurrent protocols and frameworks in place for the assessment and diagnosis of leaners with \nAutism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in Mauritius including the role of educational and \nparamedical professional in the process? Thank you. \nDr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I will come with an elaborated answer for \nthis particular question. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Apollon! \nMr Apollon: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as the hon. Minister is aware for these types of \nschools, we also have private schools, can the hon. Minister indicate to the House, is the same \nlogistic and control and facilities being given by his Ministry to those private schools? \nDr. Gungapersad: Definitely, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the same provision because we \ntreat all our children in the same way. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Members before we proceed, I have been informed by the \nAg. Clerk that there has been a misunderstanding regarding the withdrawal of the questions \nof hon. Rookny. So, the questions are back on the roll. \nHon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes! \n\n50 \n \nLA LOUISE – FLOOD MITIGATION – CONSULTANCY STAGE COMPLETION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/151",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 151,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/151) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to flood mitigation at La \nLouise, he will state if the consultancy stage therefor has been completed and, if so, indicate \n– \n(a) \nthe main recommendations thereof, and \n(b) \nwhen the project will be implemented and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to thank the hon. Member to give me the \nopportunity to shed light on the status of the drain project at La Louise.  \nThe region of La Louise has often been subject to flooding in the past years and has \nbeen declared as a high-risk flood prone area by the Land Drainage Authority. With a view to \naddressing the flooding issues holistically in the region of La Louise and mitigating the \nincidence of flooding thereat, I am informed by the NDU that a contract for consultancy \nservices for the design, supervision and management for flood mitigation measures in the \nregion of La Louise, La Source and Candos, Quatre Bornes was awarded to Vyas Consulting \nEngineers Ltd. on 15 November 2023. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that the detailed design report has \nnot yet been finalised due to the complexity of the project and the site conditions. In fact, the \nregion of La Louise is densely populated with both residential and commercial buildings and \nan extensive network of underground services such as the sewer lines, the CWA pipes and the \nMT lines. These services would need to be relocated during the implementation. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that the Consultant has highlighted the absence \nof a nearby outlet at La Louise, which would result in the construction of a drain network \nover a longer stretch with a discharge point at River Rempart in order to mitigate the flooding \nproblem thereat. Moreover, Vyas Consulting Engineers Ltd. has also conveyed that there is \nno room for upgrading works on the existing watercourse, namely Canal Nelan which is \nunder capacity and is obstructed with construction of around 200 houses. Canal Nelan passes \nthrough private premises and there is no visibility on its structure. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed that the Consultant is working on a \nmasterplan for the whole region which, amongst others, would require the construction of 10 \nkms of drain. The whole project is expected to cost some Rs5.6 billion. However, the \n\n51 \n \nConsultant has proposed the implementation of the critical part along La Louise comprising \nthe construction of 2 kms of drains along Lal Bahadur Shastri Street, Candos Road, Nehru \nRoad and Phoenix-Beaux Songes Road up to the outlet at River Rempart which would also \ninclude the construction of drain of the 11m deep at some locations over a length of 300 m. \nThis is expected to cost some Rs1.3 billion.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, due to the high risk and cost of the project, it is warranted that \na geotechnical investigation be carried out with exploratory works to finalise the detailed \ndesign report with a view to – \n(i) \nconfirming the feasibility of the project; \n(ii) \nvalidating the methodology for excavation, and \n(iii) \nidentifying the buried services and the soil strata. \nI am informed that the draft bidding document for the geotechnical investigation and \nexploratory works is being prepared and the report is expected by the end of August 2025. \nThereafter, the detailed design report is expected to be finalised by mid-October 2025.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am not in a position to \nconfirm the dates for the implementation of the project at this point in time as we shall await \nthe finalisation of the detailed design report in the first instance. However, I wish to inform \nthe hon. Member that I have requested the NDU to closely monitor the situation and to \nexpedite the matter for an early implementation. \nMs Anquetil : Je vous remercie, M. le président. Ce problème d’inondation perdure \ndepuis plus de 10 ans dans la région de La Louise. Could the Minister inform the House what \ninterim measures, if any, have been put in place to mitigate flooding in the area of La Louise? \nThank you.  \nMr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, unfortunately, so far, no short-term mitigating \nmeasures have been implemented. However, regarding the situation and the complexity of the \nwork and the cost implication, we can propose some short-term temporary measures \ndepending on the geotechnical investigation that will be carried out. The short-term \ntemporary measures will include the construction of an absorption drain and gravity drain up \nto a quarry in La Source. There is a quarry in La Source. We can consider the passivity of a \nshort-term absorption drain and gravity drain.  \nWe must understand that the temporary and short-term measures will not solve the \nproblem. It will solve it around 50%. Water accumulation flood will still occur, but to a lower \n\n52 \n \nlevel. If we implement these short-term measures, it will cost Rs500 m. as temporary \nmeasures. \nMs Anquetil: Another one! Last one, please! \nThe Deputy Speaker: I am interested in it as well! \nMs Anquetil : M. le président, à chaque forte pluie, les habitants de La Louise, les \ncommerçants, les taximen, les collégiens vivent dans une grande angoisse. Face à cette \ndétresse grandissante, est-ce que le ministre accepterait-il de se rendre sur place afin de \nconstater l’ampleur du problème aux côtés des habitants, s’il vous plaît ? Merci. \nMr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, obviously, I have no objection. I will be more \nthan glad to have a site visit together with the members of the Constituency… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do not forget me as well! \nMr Gunness: …including the Deputy Speaker! I will have no objection to have a visit. \nBut we must understand, as I said it, the cost of the whole project is high, it is Rs5.6 billion. \nWhen we are talking about the outlet, unfortunately, there is no outlet. The outlet will be at \nBeaux Songes. This is what we call River Rempart. So, the drain will have to start from La \nLouise to go over a stretch of nearly 10kms, as I said. So, I will be happy to come for a site \nvisit and we can explain to the people there. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question! \n \nTRIO ROAD, TRIOLET & CHEMIN MACADAM, BAIE DU TOMBEAU – \nREMEDIAL WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/152",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 152,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/152) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to Trio Road and Chemin \nMacadam in Triolet and Baie du Tombeau, respectively, he will state if he has been made \naware of the deplorable state thereof and, if so, indicate when remedial works will be carried \nout thereat, further indicating the – \n (a) estimated cost thereof, and \n (b) expected completion date thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: M. le président, j’ai été informé de l’état déplorable de nos routes \nmentionné par l’honorable membre à Triolet et à Baie du Tombeau. Il convient de souligner \nque le revêtement temporaire d’un tronçon de 620 mètres a déjà été réalisé au chemin \nMacadam à Baie du Tombeau.  \n\n53 \n \nPour la partie (a) et (b) de la question, la CWA m’a informé que le coût estimé pour la \nréintégration permanente du chemin va coûter environ deux millions de roupies et que la \ndurée des travaux sera d’environ deux semaines.  \nQuant à la route de Trio à Triolet d’une longueur d’environ 900 mètres, j’ai été informé \nque la RDA procédera à sa réfection permanente pour un coût estimé à sept millions de \nroupies. Les travaux ont débuté le 17 mars 2025 et devraient s’achever le 31 mars 2025. \nM. le président, j’ai été informé que la CWA avait lancé un appel d’offres pour la \nréfection permanente de plusieurs routes dans le nord. Cependant, je dois préciser que l’appel \nd’offres ne peut pas être attribué. Le board, le management de CWA, je veux dire, avant les \nélections, n’avaient pas respecté les procédures de passation du marché public dans la gestion \nde ce projet. C’est avec consternation que j’ai appris de la direction de la CWA – enfin, de ce \nqu’il reste – comment les projets de remplacements des tuyaux ont été mis en œuvre à la \nCWA.  \nLe budget 2024-2025 prévoit une dotation d’une valeur d’un milliard de roupies sur \ntrois exercices financiers pour financer des travaux de remplacement des tuyaux de la CWA \nde 1 km à 3 km. Et cela s’applique à toutes les régions du pays. Donc, l’entrepreneur, cette \nPME éventuelle doit entreprendre les travaux suivants – \n(i) \nl’approvisionnement en tuyaux et raccords, des pipes and fittings dans ce \nprojet ; \n(ii) \n l’attribution des contrats à des petites et moyennes entreprises, donc ça, c’est la \nCWA qui donne, et  \n(iii) \nla remise en état de la route, de ce que l’honorable membre parle ici. \nCependant, au lieu d’étaler cette dotation d’un milliard de roupies sur trois exercices \nfinanciers comme prévu dans le budget 2024-2025, je suis informé que la CWA a émis en \n2024 – l’année dernière – des contrats d’une valeur supérieure à R 1 500 000 000 pour ce \nprojet ; ce qui est contraire aux dispositions de la loi sur le marché public.  \nIl va sans dire, M. le président, que des centaines de millions de roupies de contrats ont \nété alloués juste à la veille des dernières élections générales. Donc, entre deux mois à un mois \ndes élections générales, des millions de roupies de contrats ont été alloués sur papier sans que \nl’on respecte ce barème d’un milliard de roupies. \nDonc, dans l’état actuel des choses, l’appel d’offres, M. le président, lancé par la CWA \npour refaire le revêtement de ce que vous voulez, d’un certain nombre de routes dont les \n\n54 \n \nnoms sont dans votre question, ne pourra pas être attribué en raison de l’irrégularité \nsusmentionnée. Mon ministère devra maintenant s’adresser au ministère des Finances pour \ndemander une augmentation du montant du projet et obtenir l’approbation du gouvernement \npour un montant révisé dorénavant de R 1 595 000 000, qui a été déjà alloué, les contrats sont \nsortis, conformément aux procédures applicables aux projets d’investissement. Ce n’est qu’à \nce moment-là que l’appel d’offres pour la remise en état de la route pourra être attribuée, et \nque les paiements en attente, je dis bien, que les paiements en attente aux fournisseurs et aux \npetites et moyennes entreprises pourront être effectués. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you have a supplementary question? \nMr Rookny: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, considering the suffering of my constituents that \nhas arisen mainly because of this major irregularity, can we obtain from the Minister if \nactions will be taken against those who have caused this situation? \nMr Assirvaden: M. le président, certainement, les gens responsables de cela auront à \nrépondre. Mais, M. le président, la difficulté du moment, ma difficulté du moment est que \ntous ceux qui ont la responsabilité de me donner des renseignements et des informations sur \nvotre question ont été des proches collaborateurs, sinon des complices de l’ancien directeur \ngénéral, Monsieur Prakash Maunthrooa. C’est cela mon souci ici, et ces mêmes personnes \naujourd’hui, ces officiers – j’ai les noms, sept officiers en particulier et les grades – ont été \nimpliqués ou ont été partie prenante dans diverses décisions et pratiques de ce qu’on parle \naujourd’hui, sortant d’un milliard de roupies pour arriver à R 1 595 000 000 sans passer par \ndes appels d’offres.  \nVous savez, c’est très important de faire comprendre que ce qui s’est passé dans le \ntemps, il y avait ce projet de R 700 000 000 de pipe replacement programme dont je parle à \nchaque fois, et qui est entre les mains de la Financial Crimes Commission à l’heure où je \nvous parle. Ce qui s’est passé, c’est que l’ancien directeur général donnait des instructions \npas écrites, verbales, dont des menaces. Ceci dit, il fallait à tout prix respecter ce seuil de R \n10 000 000 pour chaque projet. Donc, si nous avons R 700 000 000 de projets, il va diviser en \n70 projets – si mes mathématiques sont bonnes – de R 10 000 000 pour pouvoir éviter the \nCentral Procurement Board, éviter les appels d’offres et donner directement. C’est pour cette \nraison qu’on se retrouve aujourd’hui dans cette situation, et il me faut aller demander une \nrévision de ce barème au ministère des Finances, au gouvernement, pour que nous puissions \ncompléter ce projet. \n\n55 \n \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes! \nBEAU BASSIN, ROSE HILL & EBÈNE – CYCLE NETWORK PROJECT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/153",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 153,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/153) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Cycle Network Project for the \nregions of Beau Bassin, Rose Hill and Ebène, he will state the – \n(a) \nscope of works, indicating the associated costs thereof, and  \n(b) \ndaily frequency of cyclists using the network.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that my Ministry \nenlisted the services of a consultant in 2019 to develop design standards for the integration of \ncyclist as a means of commuting in Mauritius and proposing a detailed cycling network plan \nfor four specific regions, including Rose Hill, which is the subject of the question. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard part (a) of the question, I am informed that the scope \nof works for the project comprises a total of 6.1 km of cycle network covering the areas of \nEbène to Rose Hill and Balfour to Beau Bassin Metro Station as follows – \n(i) \n1.55 km of segregated cycle track from Ebène gymnasium till Ebène Recreational \nPark through Morcellement Ebène and linking École Hotelière and MITD Ebène \nwith the network; \n(ii) \n1 km of segregated cycle tracks from Ebène Metro Station till Ebène Recreational \nPark and linking residential zones of Ebène Cybervillage and Morcellement au \nBout du Monde with the network; \n(iii) 0.95 km of segregated cycle track from Ebène Recreational Park to Rose Hill \nMetro Station and Place Margeot; \n(iv) 0.1 km of segregated cycle track from Place Margeot to Loreto College; \n(v) \n0.35 km of cycle street from Loreto College to Notre Dame de Lourdes church; \n(vi) 0.95 km of cycle lane from Notre Dame de Lourdes church to Montmartre \nchurch, Municipality of Beau Bassin-Rose Hill, Plaza, St Mary’s College, and \nlastly \n\n56 \n \n(vii) 1.2 km of cycle street from Balfour Garden till Beau Bassin Metro Station and \nSacré Coeur Church. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the infrastructure for the cycle network also included 78 cycle \nracks installed at seven key locations, road markings and traffic signs. The total cost of the \nproject amounted to Rs63,435,715.16 inclusive of VAT. \nMs Anquetil: 63! \nMr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (b) of the question, I \nwish to inform the House that the cycle network is not yet operational. \nMr Bhagwan: Zot’nn bez kas ladan. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, cycling is an ecofriendly mode of \ntransportation and it is integrated with the public transport network in many countries. In fact, \nit has been announced in this Government Programme 2025-2029 that cycling infrastructure \nwould also be developed into the country’s larger strategy mobility. In fact, making cycling \nsafe is one of the mottos for the 8th Un Global Road Safety Week. Thank you! \nMr Bhagwan: … zot’nn bez kas ladan. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member. \nMs Anquetil: M. le président, pour être honnête avec vous, je suis abasourdie. Je suis \nabasourdie quand je vois la somme qui été dépensée, R 63 millions pour un projet qui ne \nbénéficie à personne. \nAn hon. Member : Ah si, même plusieurs ! \n(Interruptions) \nMs Anquetil: Alors, would the Minister inform the House whether the bike lane has \nbeen gazetted and incorporated into the Road Traffic Act, please? Thank you. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this is a very pertinent question. The \nproject contract was awarded on 08 December 2022 and was completed on 15 November \n2024, one week before I became Minister. I wish to inform the House, and on a note of \nconcern, that no appropriate regulations under the Road Traffic Act have been made so far. \nSo, the priority of those implementing the project was to implement their project for Rs63 m. \nbut the legal part was not done. So, we are working on it now, and once this is done – \n\n57 \n \nhopefully soon – then we can start sensitising the public to use it if the regulations are \napproved. I cannot take it on me right now, but if they are approved, then it will be this way. \nMs Anquetil: M. le président, une dernière s’il vous plait. C’est vraiment important, R \n63 millions… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, go on. \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, M. le président… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Your question! \nMs Anquetil: Franchement vous dire, c’est scandaleux. Scandaleux ! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question now! \nMs Anquetil: Je voudrais, s’il vous plait, déposer deux photos sur la table de \nl’Assemblée nationale. La première concernant ce fameux bike lane à Ebène. À peine deux \nans, la peinture verte qui est déjà partie. Et ensuite, à Rose Hill, derrière le collège St Mary’s, \ndeux lanes – au lieu de faciliter la circulation, ces deux lanes sont venus rétrécir la route, et \nen plus, les automobilistes ne peuvent même pas utiliser la partie verte, vu que ce n’est pas \ngazetted et ils feront une offense, etc. Alors, M. le président, le ministre pourrait-il indiquer à \nla Chambre le coût de cette peinture verte – ça m’intéresse – au mètre carré ? Ça \nm’intéresse ! Et au vu et au su de ce qu’on a entendu, est-ce qu’il envisage d’ouvrir une \nenquête pour déterminer si des commissions ont été versées, et si tel est le cas, si le rapport \nsera soumis à la FCC ? Je vous remercie, M. le président. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Fortunately, I have brought the bill of quantities together with \nme. So, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the painting that the hon. Member is referring to and which \nhas faded away costed tax payers Rs1,632 per metre square. \nAn hon. Member: Poz marb sa! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Osman Mahomed: Much more expensive… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Let’s listen to the Minister, please! \n\n58 \n \nMr Osman Mahomed: Much more expensive than bitumen of 50 mm thick, which \ncosted Rs922. So, I am quite baffled by the photo that you are showing, that the painting is \nbeing washed away with great facility. So, the point is taken; an inquiry will be done on this.  \nMs Anquetil: Thank you. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Since the Member is interested, I can table a copy of the bill of \nquantities. \nMs Anquetil: Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, thank you. The hon. Third Member for Port Louis North \nand Montagne Longue! \nMAMZELLE LAURE, TERRE ROUGE – MORCELLEMENT PROJECT – DRAIN \nCONSTRUCTION WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/154",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 154,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/154) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the new \nMorcellement project in Mamzelle Laure, Terre Rouge, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Land Drainage Authority, information as to whether any drain construction \nwork is being envisaged thereat, indicating where matters stand, giving details – \n(a) \non the scope of works, and  \n(b) \nthe expected start and completion dates thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that the District Council of \nPamplemousses had, on 29 September 2023, appointed Vyyaass Consulting Engineer Ltd as \nconsultant for the new Morcellement at Mamzelle Laure. It had to conduct an assessment and \npropose a holistic flood mitigation plan instead of adopting a piecemeal approach. Thereafter, \nthe consultant submitted an initial report in December 2023 and a finalised report in \nNovember 2024.  \nThe proposed scope of works at Mamzelle Laure comprises the following – \n\n59 \n \n\nthe construction of a reinforced concrete collector drain, measuring 700 mm wide \nby 700 mm deep along Mamzelle Laure Street, with metal gratings at 3 m interval \nover a length of 100 m, and  \n\nthe construction of a reinforced concrete collector drain, measuring 1000 mm \nwide by 1000 mm deep, discharging into the natural drain towards River \nTombeau over a stretch of 105 m. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed that the District Council of \nPamplemousses will proceed, in a first instance, with the construction of the 100 m of drain. \nBidding documents are under preparation. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard part (b) of the question, I am informed that once \nfinancial clearance is obtained, the District Council of Pamplemousses will be able to start \nthe work by end of May 2025. The project duration has been proposed to be three months. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 20 – EVACUEE CENTRES – OPENING, MANNING & \nTRANSPORT ARRANGEMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/155",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 155,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/155) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity whether, in regard \nto designated Evacuee Centres on the occurrence of natural disasters in Constituency No. 20, \nBeau Bassin and Petite Rivière, he will state the – \n(a) \nnumber thereof, indicating their respective locations, and  \n(b) \narrangements put in place, if any, for the transportation of evacuees to these \nCentres promptly and safely.",
      "answer": "Mr Subron: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that the procedures \nadopted in the event of a cyclonic and torrential rains are spelt out in the National Disaster \nScheme 2015 and my Ministry is responsible for the opening and manning of evacuee centres \nduring these events. \nEvacuee centres are opened either when a cyclone warning class 3 is issued by the \nMauritius Meteorological Services or following a request from the National Emergency \n\n60 \n \nOperations Command (NEOC) in the event of torrential rain, flooding or any other national \ndisasters. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that for Cyclonic Season 2024-2025, 166 \nevacuee centres have been finalised across the island. For the recent passage of the cyclone \nGarance, all the 166 evacuee centres have been supplied with basic necessities such as bottle \nwater, biscuits, baked beans and yoga mats. In addition, the new government has also \nincluded canned tuna in the latest food pack.  \nAll the evacuee centres fall under the purview of the Ministry of Gender Equality and \nFamily Welfare and the local authorities. Before finalising the list, an assessment of each of \nthese centres is carried out by my Ministry in collaboration with the appropriate stakeholders \nto ensure their suitability to be used as evacuee centres. My Ministry employs on needs and \nad hoc basis three officers, namely a Supervisor, an Assistant Supervisor and a Caretaker to \noperate each of the evacuee centre.  \nThe list of evacuee centres, together with the list of staffing, are updated yearly prior to \nthe start of cyclonic season. The present list was established under the previous government. \nAfter the present cyclonic season, this list might be reviewed.  \nIn the public interest, I am tabling, in the National Assembly, the full list of evacuee \ncentres for the benefit of the public. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, though evacuee centres \nare not classified constituency-wise, I am, nevertheless, informed that there are 8 evacuee \ncentres in Constituency No. 20, Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière, namely – \n1. \nMont Roches Social Welfare Centre; \n2. \nBarkly Community Centre; \n3. \nColonel Maingard Community Centre; \n4. \nCoromandel Community Centre; \n5. \nPetite Rivière Social Welfare Centre; \n6. \nAlbion Community Centre; \n\n61 \n \n7. \nGros Cailloux Community Centre, and \n8. \nCanot Community Centre. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that \narrangements for the transportation of refugees to these centres are made as and when \nrequired by the Police through the NEOC to ensure safety during natural disasters. Thank \nyou, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \n \nMr Quirin: M. le président, je remercie l’honorable ministre pour sa réponse. Dans la \nliste qui avait été circulée au niveau du public lors du passage du dernier cyclone par rapport \nà la circonscription no. 20, d’après cette liste, je n’ai constaté que quatre centres de refuge et \nlà, l’honorable ministre nous parle de 8. Peut-être qu’il y a eu un malentendu quelque part. Je \nne suis pas en train de dire que l’honorable ministre ne dit pas la vérité mais je pense qu’il y a \neu, probablement, une erreur au niveau de la liste qui avait été circulée pour la circonscription \nno. 20 ou uniquement la partie rurale est mentionnée. La partie rurale – je parle de Canot \nGros Cailloux, Petite Rivière et Albion. Au niveau de cette partie de la circonscription \nuniquement, il y avait des centres de refuge. Donc, l’honorable ministre conviendra qu’il \nfaudrait, je pense, quand on circule une liste, qu’on s’assure effectivement que ce soit la \nbonne liste avec tous les centres, qui englobe toute la circonscription. Je vous remercie, M. le \nprésident.  \n \nMr Subron: The list I am tabling in the National Assembly mentions the 8 centres. I \nam not aware of the list that you have mentioned, but I can confirm to the House that in \nConstituency No. 20, there are 8 evacuee centres. \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet! \nPUBLIC HOSPITALS – MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/156",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 156,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/156) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to medical negligence in public \nhospitals, he will state the number of reported alleged cases thereof by patients or their \nfamilies over the past five years, indicating – \n(a) \nwhere matters stand as to the investigations being carried out thereinto;  \n\n62 \n \n(b) \nthe sanctions imposed in confirmed cases of medical negligence, and  \n(c) \nthe measures being implemented to prevent the recurrence of such instances.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, upon receipt of an alleged case of medical \nnegligence within the public health institutions, my Ministry initiates the necessary action to \nrefer the case to Medical Council of Mauritius for an in-depth investigation. \nI wish to inform the House that my Ministry has referred 155 alleged cases of medical \nnegligence registered within the public health institutions to Medical Council of Mauritius for \nthe period of January 2020 to date. Out of these 155 cases, 140 cases have been investigated \nand 15 are awaiting investigation. Of the 140 investigations initiated at the level of Medical \nCouncil of Mauritius, 130 cases have been put aside and 10 cases have been referred to \nMedical Disciplinary Tribunal.  \nRegarding the 10 cases referred to the Medical Disciplinary Tribunal, 4 cases had been \nreferred to the Public Service Commission for inflicting sanctions while five cases are still \nunder investigation and one had been withdrawn.  \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, the sanction that are imposed in confirmed cases \nof medical negligence are in accordance with Section 46 (e) Part V of Public Service \nCommission Regulations. I wish to inform that the sanctions taken depend on the severity of \nthe case. I am also informed that one Medical Practitioner has been interdicted so far. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I must confess that I am not satisfied at all with the way \ncomplaints have been dealt with so far. At times, complainants have had to wait for years to \nknow the outcome of enquiries. This is the reason for which my Ministry is revamping the \nprocedures for investigating cases of alleged medical negligence within our public health \ninstitutions. These new procedures have been designed to streamline investigations, ensure \ngreater accountability and ultimately enhance patient safety across our healthcare system.  \nThere is now a preliminary investigation at the level of Regional Health Hospitals for \neach case of suspected medical negligence to ascertain the facts and determine whether an \nappropriate course of action is taken.  \nIn addition, a Medical Negligence Board is being set up within the Ministry. The \nMedical Negligence Board may call any officer concerned and the complainant or \n\n63 \n \ncomplainants for further explanations if required and eventually submit a report to the Acting \nSenior Chief Executive of my Ministry with his recommendations for further actions.  \nMoreover, the implementation of clinical auditing is being planned with the setting up \nof a Clinical Audit Committee in each speciality, chaired by the relevant consultant in charge. \nThe committee will identify key areas for auditing, collect and analyse relevant data and \ncompare the findings against established clinical guidelines and best practices.  \nThe Ministry has also introduced a weekly mortality meeting which is chaired by the \nRegional Health Director in each hospital. These meetings involve relevant consultants and \nare dedicated to scrutinise all deaths within the hospital. The primary aim is to identify any \npreventable causes and ensure that there are no lapses in care.  \nTo complement these measures, the Medical Council Act will also be amended to \nfurther streamline and expediate the procedures for dealing with cases of alleged medical \nnegligence. This will ensure that investigations are conducted promptly and efficiently \nallowing speedy actions where necessary. \nMr Rookny: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, considering the fact that it has been taking quite \nsome time for investigations to reach an end, is there any provision in the procedures to allow \nvictims and families of victims to have information about where the investigations have \nreached? \nMr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this is the reason I have mentioned that I am not \nhappy at all the way things were being conducted. That is the reason why the different \ncommittees have been set up. I can assure the hon. Member this is being done in all \ntransparence so that the complainant will come to know what has been done. He will be \ncalled as and when required. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Juman, you have a question? \nMr Juman: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Hon. Minister, you mentioned that \nthere has been a withdrawal in a case at the level of Disciplinary Committee. Can I know the \nreason of the withdrawal among the number of cases? \nMr Bachoo: There has been one withdrawal. I have heard that the Medical Council \nitself has dropped the case because the case was not brought properly before the Council. \nThis is the impression that was being given. They had not properly prepared the case. \n\n64 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: I am allowing one last question on this. Yes! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. May I ask the hon. Minister whether \nhe will consider having re-training courses for those who are sanctioned repeatedly by the \nMedical Council, at the level of his Ministry? Thank you. \nMr Bachoo: I will take note of this suggestion. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle! \nPRIMARY & SECONDARY SCHOOLS – DEPLORABLE STATE – CIVIL WORKS \nAUDIT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/157",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 157,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/157) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to primary and \nsecondary schools, he will state if he has been made aware of the deplorable state of some of \nthese schools, indicating if his Ministry is planning to carry out an audit to gauge the civil \nworks required to bring the physical infrastructures and hygienic facilities thereof up to norm.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to thank the hon. Third \nMember for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle. To be brief, yes. In fact, most of the primary \nand secondary schools are in a deplorable state. Also, the physical infrastructure and the \nhygiene facilities are deplorable. \nI wish to inform the House that there are currently 208 government primary schools and \n63 state secondary schools. Most of the primary schools date back to some 50 to 70 years, \nwhile our secondary schools date back to some 15 to 20 years. I have to add that my Ministry \nhas injected funds to the tune of some Rs775 m. over the last three years in the maintenance \nand upgrading of our school infrastructure. \nUnfortunately, there has been only an ad hoc management of infrastructure over the \nrecent years where only nominal maintenance has been undertaken. In fact, no infrastructural \naudit of old buildings has been carried out. As yet to find out, the state of the buildings in \nterms of a structural stability and soundness. The Ministry has embarked on a primary school \nrenewal project which was implemented over three phases.  \nHowever, from records available, the programme did not bring the intended outcome \nand there is a need to have an overall review in collaboration with the Ministry of National \nInfrastructure. \n\n65 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, based on the financial position situation of the current \nfinancial year and since most buildings date back to some 50 to 70 years, a few of them might \nrequire major upgrading or full revamping. Accordingly, I intend to propose a comprehensive \nconsultancy for an audit of all civil and electrical works required, not only for classrooms, but \nalso for other amenities, for example, washrooms, demonstration rooms, in the next budget. \nThe audit will also be extended to cater for the diminishing number of students joining the \nprimary and secondary education sectors so as to have a clearer picture of the actual space \nrequirement.  \nAt the same time, one of the terms of reference of the audit would be to propose a \nsegregated action plan ranging from short-term to long-term, extending to five years. During \nthis mandate, I intend to ensure that at least 60 to 70% of the infrastructure is brought to \nacceptable norms which would satisfy SDG 4 – ensure inclusive and equitable quality \neducation and promoting lifelong learning opportunities overall. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards hygienic facilities, it is noted that Occupational \nSafety and Health Officers posted at my Ministry carry out regular site visits in all \ngovernment primary schools and state secondary schools. It has been reported that there are \nserious hygienic shortcomings in some schools.  \nHowever, the lacunas are looked into as and when the issues are reported. It is to be \nhighlighted that my Ministry has a contract with Mauri-Facilities Ltd for the daily cleaning of \nthe school premises, including the cleaning of toilets. I am informed that there are 135 \ntechnicians responsible for the cleaning of toilets and 435 technicians for yard cleaning. \nHowever, numerous complaints have been received pertaining to service delivery. This is \ntaken seriously by my Ministry. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am sure, after the audit, my Ministry would be in a better \nposition to have a relook in the sector in terms of infrastructure and as well as associated cost \nincluding all HR requirements.  \nMr Deputy Speaker: Yes.  \nMr Ramdass: I thank the hon. Minister for his reply. Could the hon. Minister \nenlighten the House – obviously, in the light of the answers provided by he himself – as to \nany concrete remedial measures, if any, taken by himself, by his Ministry, since he assumed \noffice with a view to tackle, to mitigate those problems enumerated by himself? \n\n66 \n \nThank you.  \nDr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, yes, we have a lot of problems. When I \njoined this Ministry, I went to Cabinet, and fortunately, my colleagues agreed to provide \nRs75,000 for primary and Rs100,000 for secondary schools – for each – in order to mitigate, \nin the first instance, the shortcomings.  \nBut, also, I wish to inform the House that with a view to ascertaining proper \nimplementation of maintenance and upgrading of schools, visits have been carried out in at \nleast some 15 primary and secondary schools, by myself and other colleague Ministers, \nJunior Ministers and backbenchers and they reported the matter, and in some cases, we \nremedied the situation. Subsequent visits will be carried out in order to see to it that our kids \nbenefit from the best infrastructure and hygiene facilities in primary and secondary schools.  \nMr Deputy Speaker: You have a question, hon. Seeburn? \nMr Seeburn: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, will the hon. Minister also \nconsider extending this exercise to the MITD Educational Institutions as well, being given \nthat the students are meant to be treated equally and some of those schools need urgent \nattention, in particular, the one in Rose-Belle? \nDr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, yes. MITD institutions fall under the \npurview of Ministry of Education and the kids who go to these institutions are our kids and \ndefinitely, we should look after them as well.  \nMr Deputy Speaker:  Hon. Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \nPROFESSOR HASSAN RAFFA SSS – 10 MARCH 2025 INCIDENT – CASUALTIES \n& ACTIONS TAKEN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/158",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 158,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/158) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & \n Montagne Longue) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether he will \nstate if he has been made aware of an incident that occurred at the Professor Hassan Raffa \nState Secondary School on 10 March 2025 and, if so, indicate the – \n(a) \ncasualties, if any, reported, and  \n(b) \nremedial actions being envisaged to avoid the recurrence thereof. \n\n67",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, at the outset, let me make it clear that I \nam going to answer a very sensitive question. So, I hope we keep it at that level because we \nare talking about our kids.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry has been informed of an unfortunate incident \nwhich occurred on 10 March 2025, involving students – I am hesitating but I have to take the \nnames of the institutions because I don’t want them to be stigmatised afterwards but the \nquestion being there, I will name the schools – from Terre-Rouge State Secondary School \nand Professor Hassan Raffa State Secondary School. It has been reported that during the \nincident, the students from Terre Rouge State Secondary School threw stones at Professor \nHassan Raffa State Secondary School which resulted in two broken window panes and one \nstudent, namely, Mr P.E., who sustained an injury under his right eye. The injured student \nwas immediately given first aid and has since made a full recovery and returned to school. \nPolice were called to the scene and conducted an enquiry which is underway. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in response to the recurring nature of these incidents, the \nDirector Zone 1 of my Ministry, the Directorate, conducted a survey to assess the \ninfrastructural vulnerabilities and students’ safety protocols. As a result, several \ninfrastructural upgrades are being recommended including raising the boundary wall between \nthe two secondary schools and installing perforated iron sheets atop the wall to act as a \nphysical deterrent. These measures aim to ensure the safety and security of students of both \ninstitutions.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with a view a preventing similar incidence in the future, the \nZone 1 Directorate, has also recommended a series of remedial actions. Rectors from both \nschools have been advised to conduct sensitisation sessions to – \n1. Promote proper behaviours; \n2. Encourage positive conduct, and \n3. Employ restorative practices to resolve conflicts.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, moreover, mediation sessions between students from both \nsecondary schools will be introduced to eliminate hostility and foster mutual respect. This has \nnot been done over the past ten years; we are going to do it, most probably, next week. Close \nmonitoring at sensitive points, especially near boundary areas, during breaks and dismissal \ntimes, will be intensified.  \n\n68 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, collaboration between these two schools will be reinforced \nthrough joint activities and discussions with stakeholders including the Child Development \nUnit and the Crime Prevention Unit, who will conduct awareness sessions on the legal \nconsequences of vandalism and violent behaviour. Regular workshops on conflict resolutions, \nempathy building and peer mediation will further strengthen positive students’ engagement. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I also take this opportunity to clarify that my Ministry has \nalready taken a firm policy decision regarding Terre Rouge SSS. The school is being \nprogressively phased out and will become an exclusively girls’ school. The intake of boys has \nalready ceased and this transition is ongoing. In the spirit of good neighbourhood \nrelationships, I will, personally, ensure that a meeting is convened shortly to consolidate ties \nof friendship between these two neighbouring institutions.  \nThe students will be sensitised to view this proximity as an opportunity for enrichment \nrather than conflict. They will be encouraged to leverage shared infrastructure, promote a \nculture of respect and foster a sense of belonging. These schools exist not to be divided by \nhostility but to thrive through collaboration and mutual growth. In the future, many joint \nprojects can be developed to transform this shared space into a model of cooperation and \nunity. \nThank you.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Savanne and Black River! \nMARTINIÈRE ROAD, SURINAM – BARE LAND – ILLEGAL DUMPING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/159",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 159,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/159) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the bare land of an extent of 8 \narpents situated at Martinière Road, Surinam, currently abandoned and being used unlawfully \nas a wasteland, he will state the measures being envisaged in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Thank you. I am informed that the plot of land situated at Martinière \nRoad, Surinam, was initially vested under the Ministry of Local Government on 14 \nDecember 1988, and subsequently, allocated to the then District Council of Grand-\nPort/Savanne for the purpose of operating a waste disposal site. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, following the commissioning of the Mare Chicose sanitary \nlandfill in 1997, the dumping site at Martinière Road was officially closed. Since then, it has \nbeen utilised solely as a temporary dump site for the collection and removal of post cyclonic \ngreen waste. This arrangement was made with the agreement of the Solid Waste Management \n\n69 \n \nDivision of the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change, \nwhich is responsible for transporting post cyclonic waste from that temporary site to the \nlandfill.  \nIn accordance with section 59 of the Local Government Act 2011, as subsequently \namended – \n(1) \nThe Permanent Secretary is mandated to formulate policies and strategies – \n(a) \nwaste minimisation and resource recovery; and \n(b) \nstorage, collection, conveyance and disposal of waste. \n(2) \nThe Permanent Secretary in compliance with regulations established by the \nMinister is responsible for – \n(a) \nThe operation and management of disposal sites and waste management \nfacilities, and \n(b) \nControl of private operators in the field of waste management sector. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Local Government Act 2011 as subsequently amended, \noutlines in section 60 the responsibilities of local authorities with respect to waste \nmanagement. Specifically, local authorities are required – \n“(a)  \nimplement programmes and put in place mechanisms for waste minimisation, \nstorage, collection and conveyance of waste-to-waste disposal sites or waste \nmanagement facilities;  \n(b)  \nensure that waste is put in appropriate storage receptacles for collection; \n(c)  \narrange for the regular collection of waste in its jurisdiction area and transfer \nto disposal sites or waste management facilities, as appropriate.” \nFollowing the reallocation of Ministerial portfolio after the general elections of 2014, \nthe responsibility of Solid Waste Management now falls under the Ministry of Environment, \nSolid Waste Management and Climate Change. Consequently, it is the responsibility of the \nMinistry to develop and implement the necessary regulations for the effective operation and \nmanagement of waste disposal sites in accordance with national policies and environmental \nstandards. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is important to highlight that on 13 November 2024, an \nAnnual Cyclone Preparedness Meeting was convened at the Solid waste Management \nDivision of the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change. The \n\n70 \n \nmeeting was chaired by the Director the Solid waste Management Division and was attended \nby representatives from my Ministry, local authorities and contractors appointed by the Solid \nwaste Management Division. \nThe discussion focused on the following key issues – \n(i) \nThe use of former dump sites for the reception and temporary storage of \ncyclonic waste following cyclonic events; \n(ii) \nThe identification of new sites for temporary disposal of cyclonic waste, and \n(iii) \nThe radiation and updating of contingency plan for the management of cyclonic \nwaste. \nDuring the meeting, each local authority provided update on their respective temporary \ndump sites. The District Council of Savanne, in particular, reported that a plot of land at \nMartiniere Road has been identified as its temporary dumpsite. It was further agreed that this \nsite will be utilised for the disposal of cyclonic waste in the event of a cyclone where \nsubstantial amount of green waste would likely be generated following its passage.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Chairperson has instructed that contractors of the transfer \nstations must accept normal waste whereas green waste is to be directed to temporary \ndumpsites. At these sites, contractors are responsible for cutting, shortening and processing \nthe green waste before transporting it to their respective transfer stations. I have been \ninformed that following the fire outbreak at the Mare Chicose landfill on 10 December 2024, \nthe scavenging lorries of the District Council of Savanne were denied access to the landfill. \nConsequently, with the agreement of the Solid waste Management Division, household \nwaste was temporarily deposited at Martiniere road to ensure continuity of waste disposal \nservice. Upon the reopening of Mare Chicose landfill, all waste at Martiniere Road was \ncompletely removed. Furthermore, no dumping signs were installed at the site and access to \nMartiniere Road has been permanently restricted with boulders to prevent unauthorised \ndumping. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, unlike the previous administration, this Government is \ncommitted to action. We are deeply invested in environmental protection and are dedicated to \nimplementing concrete measures to uphold this commitment. The Council has decided that \nhenceforth, the site will be properly fenced to ensure effective management and \nenvironmental compliance. \n\n71 \n \nAdditionally, there are plans to develop a plant nursery and a composting facility on \npart of the land at Martiniere Road while the remaining area will continue to serve as a \ntemporary dumpsite for the disposal of post cyclonic waste and the total cost of the project is \nestimated at approximately Rs30 million and the provisions for its execution will be included \nin the next financial proposal budget. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka! \nNLTA – VACANT POSTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/160",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 160,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/160) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the National Land Transport \nAuthority, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to the \nnumber of vacancies at the – \n(a) \nAdministrative and Management level, and \n(b) \nInspectorate and Enforcement Department, indicating – \n(i) \nthe impact thereof on service delivery, and \n(ii) \nwhen the vacant posts will be filled.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the National Land \ntransport Authority (NLTA) that there are currently six vacancies at the Administrative and \nManagement Level of the NLTA namely in the post of – \n(i) \nDeputy Road Transport Commissioner; \n(ii) \nTransport Planner; \n(iii) \nTransport Controller; \n(iv) \nChief Vehicle Examiner, and \n(v) \nAdministrative Manager. \nAs regards The Inspectorate and Enforcement Department of the regulator, I am \napprised of some 40 vacancies spread over the posts of Chief Road Transport Inspector, \nPrincipal Road Transport Inspector, Senior Road Transport Inspector, Road Transport \nInspector and Traffic Warden including some 30 vacancies at the level of the Road Transport \nInspector per se. \n\n72 \n \nI wish to highlight that while some of the vacancies at the Management Level date back \nto 2019, those in the Inspectorate Cadre have occurred since 2023. The situation, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir, undoubtedly showcases a lack of succession planning at the NLTA. The absence \nof senior officers at administrative and management level impacts significantly on the overall \noperation of the department, endearing delays in the processing of applications, attending to \npublic complaints and grievances and solving the problems of customers calling daily at the \nNLTA office. We have seen many articles and outcry among the public in respect to this state \nof affairs. \nThe state of affairs resulting in the lack of inspectors is even more severe and is \nreflected everyday in the numerous complaints received from the travelling public in respect \nof the poor level of service being provided by bus operators along most of the routes \nthroughout the island. My colleagues in the House will know what I am talking about. Kan \nsat pa la, lera danse. The bus operators are taking advantage of the absence of inspectors to \neither not observe their established timetable of operation or even not to operate their buses \nwhile claiming the full amount of their free travel compensation and other subsidies which I \nremind the House, amount to some Rs2.5 billion per year. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that all \nvacancies have already been reported to the Public Service Commission and same will be \nfilled as and when decided by the latter and subject to funds being made available as well. \nMoreover, what is more surprising is that, since 2023, nothing has been done in respect \nof the post of Road Transport Inspectors. I am informed that it is only after the dissolution of \nParliament on 04 October 2024 that applicants were called for interview by the then \nCommission which is outright against the principle of good governance and unfortunately, \nthe recruitment exercise will have to be conducted afresh for obvious reasons, therefor \nentailing further delay in the process notwithstanding the fact that these Road Traffic \nInspectors are much needed to redress the state of affairs of the regulator and to assist in the \nimprovement of the poor level of bus transport services across the island like I mentioned \nearlier. \nNevertheless, my Ministry will ensure close follow up for the filling of the \naforementioned vacancies within the best possible delay. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to \nput on record that since I took office at the Ministry, I have had several meetings regarding \nthe shortage of staff at the NLTA and the latter has been urged to come up with concrete \n\n73 \n \nmeasures wit a view to facilitating the recruitment process while ensuring the right person at \nthe right place. I wish to reiterate to the House that my Ministry has already initiated \nprocedures to enlist Management Support Officers (MSOs)to strengthen the NLTA \ninspectorate pending the recruitment of substantive staff. This is not quite a given because \nMSOs are supposed to work in office but now, we are deploying them onto the site. So, there \nis a process to follow to get the approval for this. \n These MSOs will be daily deployed on bus stations and along bus routes to ensure \nNLTA presence and Compliance with the schedule of the bus services. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet! \nFISHERMEN CARDS – NORTHEN REGION BENEFICIARIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/161",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 161,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/161) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to fishermen cards, he will state the – \n       (a)   number thereof allocated to fishermen in Baie du Tombeau, Pointe aux Piments, \nMont Choisy, Trou aux Biches and Grand Baie for the past three years, and \n(b)  number of persons booked for illegal fishing during the same period, indicating if \nconsideration will be given to regularising these persons.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell:  Thank you very much. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of \nthe question, I am informed that the number of fishermen cards allocated to the \naforementioned regions for the past three years, that is, from 2022 to 2024 are as follows –  \n(i) \nBaie du Tombeau: 64 \n(ii) \nPointe aux Piments: 6 \n(iii) \nTrou aux Biches: 34 \n(iv) \nGrand Baie: 30 \nAs regards Mont Choisy, I understand that the hon. Member is referring to Pointe aux \nCannoniers Fish Landing Station. I am informed that two fishermen cards have been issued \nfor that region in the year 2022.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, I have been apprised \nthat for the five sites under reference, two persons have been booked and contravened for \nillegal fishing from 2022 to 2024.  \n\n74 \n \nMoreover, four persons have been booked and contravened for the period January to \nFebruary 2025 for illegal fishing at those sites. Regarding the last part of the question, any \nunlicensed fisherman who wishes to regularise his or her situation should submit an \napplication for fisher’s card. In case an applicant fisher fulfils the set criteria – it was \ncirculated when a question was put to me some time back –, he will be granted a fisher card. \nMr Rookny: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Is the Minister aware that there is a \nyearning demand of many unlicensed fishermen who go to fish and catch for us on a daily \nbasis and to earn for their families, but who still have not been considered for a license. Will \nhis Ministry consider allocating proper licenses to these fishermen in the near future? \nDr. Boolell: The hon. Member should be aware that none of us is insensitive to the \nplight of a fisher. There are some who, unfortunately, do not have a fisher card. Therefore, \nthey are involved in what we call illegal fishing activities. But certainly, we will entertain as \nand when required. You cannot have far too many fishers also because we have to think of \nthe stock that is in our lagoon. But certainly, we will give due consideration. \nMr Apollon: Is the Minister aware that these cards have been delivered on the eve of \nthe last general elections without any control and good vetting? Will the Minister ensure the \nHouse that the few cards that will be delivered will have a better vetting? Also, after issuing \nthe cards, can regular verifications be done to ensure that real fishermen receive their cards? \nDr. Boolell: This exercise has been carried out. But, of course, as a responsible \nGovernment, we are not going to disrupt the system violently. The deserving cases will \ncertainly be entertained. But in relation to those who have obtained fisher’s card against the \nset criteria, certainly, appropriate actions will be taken. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nACTIVE MAURITIUS – FUNDS ALLOCATED & COACHES EMPLOYED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/162",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 162,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/162) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to Active Mauritius, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Sports Council, information as to the – \n (a)  amount of funds allocated thereto on a yearly basis since 2018 to 2024 and \nJanuary 2025 to date, and \n (b)  number of coaches employed therefor region-wise, indicating in each case – \n(i)  \nthe names and respective sports fields, and  \n\n75 \n \n(ii)  \nmonthly allowances paid thereto.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to thank the hon. Member for this \nquestion which provides me with an opportunity to enlighten the House on this program that \nwas launched under the previous government and which contains many witnesses.  \nI am informed that further to the adoption of the National Sports and Physical Activities \nPolicy 2018-2028 in October 2018, the Mauritius Sports Council had developed an Active \nMauritius Strategy that was launched in July 2019. The Active Mauritius Strategy is aligned \nwith the philosophy of the policy and advocates for the widespread practice of sport as a \nmeans to achieve the policy’s objective.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that the 14 programmes that are run by the \nMauritius Sports Council, under the Active Mauritius Strategy, are categorised accordingly to \nthe following target audience – \n(1) \nMove It for those aged from 7 to 13 years old; \n(2) \nYouth on the Move for those aged 14 and 24 years old; \n(3) \nAgeing Well for those aged 25 to 65 years old, and  \n(4) \nElderly Fitness for those aged above 65 years old. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (a) of the question, I am informed by the \nMauritius Sports Council that the amount of funds allocated in favour of Active Mauritius on \nyearly basis is as follows – \n\nFor financial year 2018-2019, Rs38 m.; \n\nFor financial year 2019-2020, Rs35 m.;  \n\nFor financial year 2020-2021, Rs36 m.;  \n\nFor financial year 2021-2022, Rs47 m.;  \n\nFor financial year 2022-2023, Rs47 m.;  \n\nFor financial year 2023-2024, Rs65 m.,  \n\nFor financial year 2024-2025, Rs64 m.  \nIn view of the substantial amount allocated to the Mauritius Sports Council over the \npast years, I have some serious concerns about the running of these programmes. I have \n\n76 \n \nalready instructed the new board to carry out an evaluation therefore, and my Permanent \nSecretary to cause a full-scale enquiry to be carried out. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the \nMauritius Sports Council that the coaches to deliver the programmes of Active Mauritius are \nnot employed on a region-wise basis. The number of coaches employed, the details of the \nrespective discipline and allowances are being compiled by the Mauritius Sports Council. \nOnce available, same will be placed in the Library of the National Assembly. \nMr Quirin: Merci, M. le président. Le ministre des Sports, dans sa réponse, a fait état \ndes faiblesses par rapport à ce programme. Peut-il effectivement nous dire quelles sont les \nfaiblesses qu’il a constatées depuis sa prise de fonction par rapport à Active Mauritius ? \nMr Nagalingum: All information is being compiled. I will lay in the Library of the \nNational Assembly all the details about what we have witnessed and what we are still being \nwitnessing in these manquements. \nMr Quirin: M. le président, même si je ne suis pas très satisfait de la réponse du \nministre, je ne vais pas aller plus loin par rapport à cette question supplémentaire. J’aimerais \nsavoir, vu que ce programme Active Mauritius est un projet du gouvernement sortant, est-ce \nque l’honorable ministre compte continuer dans sa forme actuelle ou bien s’il compte \napporter des changements de façon à ce qu’on puisse satisfaire les sportifs et toute la \npopulation en général ? \nMr Nagalingum: Certainement, nous allons revoir le tout dans son ensemble. \n        The Deputy Speaker:  The hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River! \n \nTAMARIN, LA PRENEUSE & BLACK RIVER VILLAGES – \nYEMEN-MATALLA BYPASS ROAD",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/163",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 163,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/163) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the villages of Tamarin, La Preneuse \nand Black River, he will state if his Ministry is in presence of any project and/or feasibility \nstudy recommending the construction of a Yemen-Matalla bypass road to alleviate the heavy \nroad traffic in those villages and, if so, give details thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the villages of Tamarin, La Preneuse and Black \nRiver are connected through the Black River A3 Road. The western region, including these \nvillages, is witnessing increasing urban development and, as a result, the A3 Road, in its \npresent configuration, is quite limited to cope with the rising demands of vehicular and \npedestrian traffic.  \n\n77 \n \nIn this context, the Road Development Authority has enlisted the services of a \nconsultant, namely Luxconsult (Mtius) Ltd to work out the preliminary design of the \nproposed Tamarin bypass which will extend over approximately 8.5 km, providing an \nalternate route between Yemen and Grande Rivière Noire. The main aim of the project is to \ninter alia reduce traffic congestion and travel time along Rivière Noire Road A3, as well as \nenhance accessibility by providing an alternative route from Tamarin via Yemen towards \nGrande Rivière Noire on A3 Road and vice versa. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the RDA that the consultant has already \nsubmitted the following reports in respect of the project – \n(i) \nan Inception Report; \n(ii) \na Traffic Impact Assessment Report, and \n(iii) a draft Environmental Impact Assessment Report. \nIt should be highlighted that the proposed project is quite complex and is characterised \nby several constraints mostly associated with the hill at Yemen La Coupée and river crossings \nalong the proposed alignment. To address these issues, appropriate geotechnical and \nenvironmental investigations are currently under way and same, together with the final \npreliminary design report are expected to be completed by May 2025. Upon completion of \nthe preliminary design, the RDA will take into consideration the recommendation of the \nconsultant, as well as cost implications and will accordingly recommend a timeline for the \nimplementation of the project. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES PRIMARY SCHOOL CURRICULUM – EDUCATIONAL REFORMS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/164",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 164,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/164) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nEducation and Human Resource whether, in regard to the proposed reforms in the Education \nsector, he will state if consideration will be given for the introduction of Rodriguan values, \nparticularly Rodrigues history, culture and traditions, in the primary school curriculum in \nRodrigues.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in the context of our strategy to have an \ninclusive and value-based education while reckoning the specificity of Rodrigues, my \nMinistry is giving due consideration to promote the Rodriguan values and culture. \n\n78 \n \nIn fact, in the primary school textbooks of history and geography, Kreol Morisien, \nEnglish and French of different grades, several topics on Rodrigues are covered. Moreover, \nmy Ministry has already taken steps to ensure cultural relevance in the curriculum such as – \n(i) \nthe teaching of Kreol Rodrige in primary schools in Rodrigues since 2020; \n(ii) \nthe inclusion of Rodriguan stories and contexts in English, French and Kreol \nRodrige curricula, and \n(iii) the coverage of Rodriguan history and geography in the respective curriculum. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, moreover, as the House is aware, my Ministry will hold the \nAssises de l’Éducation in April 2025, wherein the representatives of the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly will also be invited to participate. \nAs hon. François, Second Member for Rodrigues, has informed the House on 04 March \n2025, Rodrigues is seeking an educational reform and model that align and adapt with its \nsocioeconomic realities. All the proposals of the stakeholders, including Rodrigues, will be \ntaken onboard and the outcome of the Assises de l’Éducation will pave the way forward for a \nreview of the present educational system and the formulation of new policy direction as from \nthe year 2026, including the review of the curriculum. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I will soon set up the National Curriculum Advisory Board, \nwhich will, inter alia, advise my Ministry on a national policy for the development of the \nschool curriculum with regard to the overall economic, social and cultural context of the \ncountry, including Rodrigues. Besides, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry will also set up \nthe National Education Council in order to, inter alia, review the implementation of plans, \npolicies, strategies, programmes and projects for the provision of education in Rodrigues. A \nrepresentative from the Rodrigues and Outer Islands Division will also be nominated on the \nCouncil in order to take onboard the proposals of the stakeholders in Rodrigues. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to reassure the House that we envision to further \nintegrate elements of Rodriguan history, culture, tradition and values in the school curriculum \nin Rodrigues. We would welcome any proposal from the Rodrigues Regional Assembly in \nthis regard such as the revisited curriculum meets the needs and aspirations of the people of \nRodrigues. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Member, do you have any questions? \n\n79 \n \nMr François: If you will allow me, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir.  With the coming Assises, \nmay I ask the hon. Minister whether participative approach consultations have been or will be \nheld with all stakeholders in Rodrigues, not only the Regional Assembly, with all \nstakeholders in Rodrigues, and if so, when? \nDr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is being planned that prior to les Assises \nin Mauritius, which will be held on 15, 16 and 17 April, a delegation from the Ministry of \nEducation will go to Rodrigues and sit down with those involved in that, listen to them, so \nthat that participation, that input is discussed during les Assises de l’Éducation. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, the First Member for Rodrigues! \nACCESS TO JUSTICE – LEGAL AID",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/165",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 165,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/165) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Attorney-\nGeneral whether, in regard to access to justice, he will state the measures being envisaged to \n– \n(a) \nensure that citizens from economically disadvantaged backgrounds and \nvulnerable groups have access to effective legal aid, and  \n(b) \naddress any barriers that may prevent same.",
      "answer": "Mr Glover: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to \ndraw the attention of the House that, as per section 4 of the Legal Aid and Legal Assistance \nAct, for a person to be eligible for legal aid in regard to civil or criminal proceedings, \nincluding a bail application or an appeal to the Supreme Court – \n(a) \nhe must not be worth more than 500,000 rupees, excluding his wearing apparel \nand tools of trade, and  \n(b) \nhis total monthly earnings shall be less than 15,000 rupees.  \n \nThe same eligibility criteria apply to a detainee or an accused party where the latter \nseeks legal assistance during a police enquiry or for bail applications.  \nThese ceilings were last looked at in the year 2018 and have not been reviewed, \nnotwithstanding the increases to pensions and the basic wage over the last few years.  \nIn addition, at District Court level, in criminal matters, legal aid is only available for a \nlimited list of offences. \n\n80 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, amendments will be brought in the coming weeks, sooner than \nlater, to the Act, as already alluded to during my address to the House on the 2025-2029 \nProgramme. The amendments will focus on a rise of the ceiling so that these are more in line \nwith what obtains in terms of revenue and ownership today with particular attention to the \naccessibility of the service for citizens from economically disadvantaged backgrounds and \nvulnerable groups. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the \nHouse that, as the law currently stands, a person has to make an application to the Court to \nobtain legal aid or legal assistance. What is however clear is that many citizens are not aware \nthat they may eligible to obtain legal aid or legal assistance in certain cases, civil or criminal. \nIndeed, the Act as it stands today lists, in a schedule, the various sections of the \ncriminal law which would find application without actually saying what offences they relate \nto. So, even if one reads the Act, it gives no adequate or/and proper indication to the citizen. \nTo render justice accessible, this will have to be tackled by an appropriate amendment so that \na citizen would be able to see for himself for which offences he may apply for legal aid. \nThere are also a number of offences which should have been listed in the Act but which are \nnot. We will review this too. \nFinally, and that is the end of my answer, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in the same vein, we \nwill also bring amendments to the Act, so that the Court will have the duty to inform a \nperson, when he is not represented by a legal practitioner, that he may apply to obtain legal \naid and legal assistance in cases where the law provides that legal aid is available, of course, \nif that citizen satisfies the relevant criteria. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and \nSouillac! \nMR P.U. SLOVAKIAN NATIONAL – FORCIBLE REMOVAL",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/166",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 166,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/166) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Attorney General whether, in regard to Mr P.U., a Slovakian national, he \nwill state the circumstances that led to the removal of the Slovakian despite pending \nextradition proceedings before the Port Louis District Court (3rd Division) and an interim \norder from the Supreme Court, duly served on the relevant authorities, indicating the action \ntaken and/or being envisaged to prevent any such occurrence. \n\n81",
      "answer": "Mr Glover: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, at the outset, I make no apology for what will be \na long reply to that question by the Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, allow me, please, first to say that this case is a prime example \nof how the rule of law could be subverted and weakened by a government for want of proper \nlegal guidance, of how our court of justice were considered, not so long ago, as an \ninconvenience that could be bypassed by the powers that be.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I will first briefly clarify the circumstances under which this \nforeign national came to Mauritius, resided here and was later forcibly removed.  \nThis Slovak national came to Mauritius in February 2019 from Kenya on a tourist visa. \nOn 13 March 2019, less than a month later, he applied through the EDB, for an Occupation \nPermit. Months later, it appears that searches made on the Controversial List of the Passport \nand Immigration Office, the Interpol Database and World-Check returned no results for him. \nHis application for an Occupation Permit was thus approved for a period of three years, so \nmuch for proper due diligence. \nOn 05 November 2020, the Attorney General’s Office received a request from the \nSlovak Republic for the arrest and extradition of that foreign national. He was wanted for \nprosecution in his country for having, at the time, allegedly masterminded, from 2015 to \n2018, a criminal group providing ingredients to produce dangerous drugs to the tune of 16 \nmillion euros.  \nIn January 2021, the Attorney General’s Office wrote to the appropriate authorities in \nMauritius to confirm the presence of the foreign national in our country. And having received \nconfirmation, we prepared draft applications for his arrest and extradition. However, these \napplications were kept in abeyance due to the second COVID-19 lockdown. Upon the re-\nopening of the Mauritian borders in October 2021, the Attorney General’s Office enquired \nwhether the Slovakian authorities were ready and willing to remove that foreign national \nfrom Mauritius, should an extradition order be made against him. \nOn 15 February 2022, the Attorney General’s Office received confirmation from the \nSlovak authorities and the applications for the arrest and extradition of the Slovak national \nwere, consequently, lodged on 22 February 2022 before the District Court of Port Louis. He \nwas arrested on the same day and was bailed out on 09 March 2022.  \n\n82 \n \nIn the same month, the Slovak national applied for a renewal of his permit as well for a \nClearance Certificate in order to marry a Mauritian national. However, on 15 April 2022, the \nthen Prime Minister deprived that foreign national of the status of resident in exercise of his \ndiscretion under section 6 of the Immigration Act after being satisfied that it was in the public \ninterest to do so. Notice of this change in status, although decided on 15 April 2022, was only \nserved on the foreign national at his last known address on 22 April 2022. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, up to this point, clearly, we had due process. We had a person \nwho had entered the country legally, became the object of extradition proceedings at the \ninstance of his own country and who, whilst these proceedings were still underway, also \nbecame a prohibited immigrant.  \nFrom thereon, there were two ways that this foreign national could be removed from \nMauritius legally, either the Court in the extradition proceedings reached the decision that it \nwas to send him back to Slovakia for prosecution or as a prohibited immigrant, he could be \nsubject to a deportation order under that Act but this was possible only after the procedure \nunder the section 5 of the Deportation Act was followed, which involved allowing that \nforeign national the opportunity to show cause why such an order ought not to be granted. \nHere, I have to point out that there is a deficiency in the deportation process, in that the \ndeportation order to be made by a Minister, here the Prime Minister, under section 4, has to \nbe in a prescribed form. And funnily enough, as at now, no such form has been prescribed. \nThis is a lacuna that this Government intends to address very soon. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have to inform the House that on 26 April 2022, an order in \nthe form of an interim injunction issued by a Judge of the Supreme Court was served on the \nState of Mauritius, the Prime Minister’s Office, the Passport Immigration Office, the \nAttorney General’s Office and the Director of Civil Aviation, prohibiting and restraining \nthem from either deporting or extraditing the foreign national.  \nIn spite of this, I am informed that on the very same day that the injunction was \ngranted, the foreign national was arrested anew, purportedly, on the basis of the Immigration \nAct, conveyed by the Police to the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport for his \nforcible removal by Slovakian authorities, which had been dispatched by a special flight, with \nits own law enforcement officers ready to take custody of their foreign national on our soil. \n\n83 \n \nThe flight took off just before 4.00 p.m. at a time when the State, the PMO, the PIO had \nalready been served with the court order. \nThe justifications for this course of action were given to this House by the then Prime \nMinister on 10 May 2022 in his replies to PQ B/525 and B/530 and in a Communiqué by the \nPrime Minister’s Office dated 30 April 2022, and as well as on many public occasions by the \nformer Attorney General. I will summarise them as follows – \n(1) \nThey said the Immigration Act allegedly provides for a route distinct and \nindependent from the Deportation Act or the Extradition Act, allowing for the \narrest of the foreign national and his conveyance to the Slovakian agents to \nforcibly take him away. \n(2) \nThey said since the procedure followed was neither that of a deportation or \nextradition, the court order was not flouted because those were the only routes \nwhich had been stated in the court order, deportation or extradition, and neither \nwere used, they said. \n(3) \nThey said in any event the Police was not subject to the court order.  \nYou remember, it was PMO, PIO, Civil Aviation and Attorney General, and we all \nknow who the Attorney General represents. In any event, they said that foreign national was a \ndangerous criminal that had to be removed but who had been granted an Occupation Permit \nwithin 60 days of arrival as a tourist in Mauritius.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, their reasoning is alarming. Let me dispatch the first reason \nthey put forward by stating that nowhere in the Immigration Act, as it stood in 2022, is there \na power to deport someone who has been residing albeit illegally in Mauritius. There are \nprovisions to declare one a prohibited immigrant and there are provisions to lawfully detain a \nperson seeking admission to the country. Section 20, invoked by the previous government, \ndoes not create any new stand-alone power to arrest or detain an illegal resident. Those \npowers fall squarely under the Deportation Act. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this is legal interpretation and this is clearly not the place to \ndebate it. I will readily concede that a legal question may have as many answers as there are \nlawyers to answer it. However, even a mistaken reading of the Immigration Act could not \n\n84 \n \njustify the rest of the previous government’s reasoning. I stand advised that there is an action \nfor contempt regarding this case presently before the Supreme Court awaiting judgement. I \nshall therefore not say more. \nThis new concept of “removal”, which involves placing the person in question in the \nhands of foreign agents on our soil is devoid, in my humble view, of any legal substrata. No \nexplanation was ever given as to the legal basis for Slovakian agents to use legitimate force \non our national soil in order to take away their national. No explanation was given, Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, because there is none, because as the Prime Minister’s Office itself \nstated in its Communiqué, this was not done under either the Extradition or the Deportation \nAct. \nThere is, in fact, a name for this, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. A name often used in human \nrights discussions around the world. This was a disguised extradition whereby a wanted \nfugitive is handed over to a foreign State by means other than the classical extradition, \nbypassing the usual safeguards of the law and the scrutiny of the courts. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the most extraordinary part of the previous government’s \njustification is this insolent insistence on the fact that, I quote – \n“At no material time was the Police the object to the Court Order.” \nIt cannot be disputed that the Commissioner of Police is but an agent of the State, and an \norder against the State necessarily implies that its agent must comply with that order. It would \nbe inappropriate, of course, at this juncture, to opine on the consequences of what happened \nas this would fall squarely in the realm of the court proceedings awaiting judgment, as I \nalluded to earlier. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it does not matter if that foreign national was later sentenced in \nSlovakia to 22 years of imprisonment for the illicit production, possession and trafficking of \ndrugs. Of course, such persons are not welcome in Mauritius. They should never have been \ngranted an Occupation Permit in the first place! But the only way we will truly tackle the \ndrug trafficking, illegal immigration or any other crime is by making sure, first and foremost, \nthat everyone respects the law, including the State. That is the rule of law, or else, our grand \nspeeches in this august Assembly would not mean a thing!  \n\n85 \n \nHere, we are left to wonder how this person was granted his Occupation Permit in such \na short period of time by the authorities. We are equally baffled by the alacrity shown by the \nauthorities to dispatch that person out of the country. Is there a correlation? I wonder! That \nbeing said, this is the rule of law which we want to restore, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir.  \nI will, therefore, answer the second part of the question of the hon. Member. There is no \nother way in order to avoid such occurrence in the future than to learn from the mistakes and \nflaws of our predecessors. And for me and members of my office, to adhere strictly to the rule \nof law, irrespective of the cost that it entails. Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. The Table has been advised that the following PQs \nhave been withdrawn: B/167, B/168, B/170, B/171, B/174, B/175, B/176, B/177, B/179, \nB/180, B/181, B/182, B/183, B/184, B/186, B/187, B/188, B/190, B/191, B/193, B/194, and \nB/195. \nTime is over for Question Time! Madam Speaker will resume the Chair. \nAt this stage, Madam Speaker took the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated!  \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that all the business on today’s \nOrder Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nPUBLIC BILLS \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Representation of the People (Amendment) Bill (No. \nIV of 2025) was read a first time. \nSecond Reading \nTHE REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE (AMENDMENT) BILL \n\n86 \n \n(NO. IV OF 2025) \nOrder for Second Reading read. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister, the floor is yours! \n(4.19 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: I beg to move that the Representation of the People \n(Amendment) Bill (No. IV of 2025) be read a second time.  \nMadam Speaker, as clearly explained in the Explanatory Memorandum, the object of \nthe Bill is to amend the Representation of the People Act so as to provide the compilation of a \nnew supplementary register of electors for the forthcoming Municipal City Council and \nMunicipal Town Council elections, or for such other election as may be prescribed.  \nThis will be compiled immediately after the issue of the writ of elections, thus allowing \nqualified, unregistered persons to submit their claims to be registered and to have their names \nincluded in that supplementary register of electors. This is being done, Madam Speaker, so \nthat every elector has the right to vote when the elections are called. \nMadame la présidente, pendant la campagne électorale, nous avions dit et redit que \nnous allions approfondir la démocratie à Maurice. One of the ways that we have seen, which \nwe have canvassed before with the Electoral Commissioner and the Electoral Commission, is \nthat very often – and this is a problem – a lot of people turn out to vote for an election and \ntheir names are not on the register. There are many reasons for this. \nFirst of all, the canvasser, who goes around to register electors, might press the door \nbutton, but nobody answers. He is then supposed to come back. I am told that very often, they \nsay, ‘maybe he came back; nobody was there, or else he never came back. These people think \nthat because they voted in the last election, their names will be on the register. We do a lot of \nadvertising, in our Party at least, that they should go and check their names. Very often, they \ndon’t! But the result is that their names are not there. Then, when they turn up to vote, they \nare told that their names are not on the register. There can be nothing so frustrating. As you \nwait for five years to go and vote, and then you don’t find your name on the register. You are \ntold you are not going to vote. \nIn the last municipal elections, there were around 1,900 electors who did not manage to \nvote. Officially, this is the number. But unofficially, I am sure it is higher. Because many \n\n87 \n \npeople, when they are told they cannot vote, they protest, but they do not protest officially; \nthey go home. So, their number is not counted in that number. So, we end up with this \nsituation where people are not able to vote. \nSecondly, I think it is absurd that the register is compiled; it closes on 15 August of \nwhatever year, and a person who is born on 16 August of that very year cannot vote until the \nregister is recompiled the following year. So, that person has turned 18 but cannot vote. This \nis what the situation has been until now. What we are doing, Madam Speaker, is to correct an \ninjustice. \nYou know, Professor Albie Sachs, who came and reported under the electoral system, \nhad this to say – I am quoting offhand.  He said that it is unbelievable that a person who is \nborn on 16 August cannot vote in any election until the following year, that is, before 15 \nAugust of the following year. That is completely unacceptable! This is what we are \ncorrecting here. \nWe are saying that the supplementary registration will be done, but it does not mean \nthat somebody who has already been registered as an elector can go on the supplementary \nlist. That is a separate list for people who have turned 18 after 15 August, who are not on the \nlist at the moment, and who will be able to go on the list. They will have until 5 days after the \nwrit of the election is issued for them to go and ensure that their names are on the list. It is \ncorrecting a major injustice that was happening in our system. \nYou have many people who have said that. There is a book called ‘How to Rig an \nElection’ by Cheeseman and somebody else. They go on about this: suppression of voters \nfrom a list is one of the ways to commit fraud in an election. This happens in many countries \neven today. Even in America, they are complaining that there has been suppression of voters. \nSo, it is not just Mauritius. What we are trying to do is to ensure that people get a chance, if \nthey want to vote, to go and put themselves on the register and be on the list of electors. \nI must also add, Madam Speaker, that this also applies to somebody who wants to stand \nin a Municipal Election. If you are not on the register, you cannot be a candidate in an \nelection. So, this will also correct this injustice, especially a young person who has just turned \n18 and maybe wants to stand as a Municipal Councillor. He would not have been able to do \nso unless he was already on the list which was closed on 15 August of last year. This is what \nwe are correcting, Madam Speaker. \n\n88 \n \nThe second thing that we are also doing – we did not say this in the Bill – is ensuring \nthat counting is done on the same day. Some people think that we will need to amend the law \nagain, but we don’t have to. This is done by regulations. Madam Speaker, in Nigeria, where I \nthink there are 23 million people, they count on the same day. In Kenya, I can’t remember the \nexact figure; it’s over 40 million. Counting is done on the same day for over 50 million \npeople. In the U.K., it’s around 43 million. Why can’t we, in Mauritius, have counting on the \nsame day? This has an advantage.  \nWe did canvass this with the Electoral Commissioner and the Electoral Supervisory \nCommission as well. There are logistical problems; they have genuine logistical problems. \nBut we must overcome those problems; we are overcoming them now. In the past, there were \nnot enough staff to start with. They were probably not even paid properly – that’s another \nproblem. But we will look into all this to make sure that counting is done on the same day \nbecause when we don’t count on the same day, there is this business of carrying ballot boxes \nin all sorts of lorries. In the preceding General Elections of 2019, in my own constituency - \nwe have witnesses -, boxes were carried in garbage trucks and in CWA lorries with people \nwe didn’t know. The Electoral Commission had said it over and over again that our agents \nhave the right to go in the lorries, but on the day of the election, we had a policeman, who \nwas probably very pro-government, who said, ‘No, you can’t get into the lorries’. Who is \ngoing to go now, and challenge him or ask the Electoral Commissioner to come and see \nwhat’s happening?  \nThis has happened in many places; in Constituency No. 10 and in many villages. This \nidea of carrying boxes and then storing them in a place is forged with possibilities. What we \nare doing is closing the loopholes. It is a loophole. In other countries, ballot boxes were \nchanged. In a country, I am told, they had double floors, and during transportation, they were \nchanging. I don’t think this happened in Mauritius, but I can’t say for sure; I can’t say \nbecause we were not even allowed to look into the lorries. We are supposed to be allowed, \nbut we were not allowed. \nIn one of the lorries, during the 2019 elections, I asked somebody what he was doing \nthere. He did not answer me. I kept asking, but he did not answer me. You know why? He \nwas a foreigner, not a Mauritian. He was there in the lorry, standing in the lorry, sitting in the \nlorry, and he was in the lorry to carry out this business of carrying boxes. That is something \nwe are also closing. Counting on the same day is possible; it must be possible. Of course, the \nESC will need manpower, but we will have to ensure that this is so, and therefore, this is \n\n89 \n \ngoing to be a thing of the past. We want to be able to do this for the General Elections as \nwell. \nThe third point that was canvassed by the Electoral Commissioner and the ESC, which \nwe totally agree with, is that we should look at the possibility of Mauritians who are abroad \nto be able to vote in an election; in other words, the diaspora. Today, people from other \ncountries are voting in Mauritius, and yet, Mauritians who are abroad cannot vote for their \nown country. That is something that we also intend to look at very positively and probably \nwill happen. These are the three main things that I wanted to say on this Bill, Madam \nSpeaker. \nThis is a great leap forward for the youth of this country. My Party gave the right to \nvote to young people at the age of 18. Today, this Alliance is allowing people who have just \nturned 18 and are not on the register to be able to vote. This is one of the major, major \nreforms that we are doing – electoral reform. This is one of the reforms; we are going to have \nother reforms as well. \nSecondly, we are going to have counting on the same day, as I said. Madam Speaker, \ndenying a person his right to vote, I can’t see anything more treacherous and unjust. How can \nwe allow somebody who waits for five years to boot out a government, as they did in the last \nelection, and yet not be able to vote in that election? Cases have happened … \n(Interruptions) \nSorry? \nAn hon. Member: 10 years for the Republic of Mauritius. \nThe Prime Minister: 10 years! Thank you for reminding me.  \nThe previous government postponed the elections not once, not twice, but thrice, \nMadam Speaker. For 10 years, people have not been allowed to vote for their councillors. \nMs Anquetil: Shame!  \nThe Prime Minister: It’s a great shame! They found all sorts of excuses, as you say; \nall sorts of excuses. We are going to have it; we have agreed. The Deputy Prime Minister, \nwhen we were passing the law about not allowing the postponement of the village elections – \nhe was Leader of the Opposition – mentioned at that time that we should do it for all \nelections, general elections as well. We will do it this time. We have to do it. \n\n90 \n \nThe thing is that I forgot my speech in my office. But I think I have said what I had to \nsay. This is the first step, as I said. \nMr Mohamed: You have said it better. \nThe Prime Minister: I have said it better. As you said, we should not be reading our \nspeeches.  \nMadam Speaker: No, you have done very well up to now.  \nThe Prime Minister: So far! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Representation of the People Act, which is the main piece of legislation governing \nour electoral process, was enacted back in 1958, at a time when Mauritius was still a British \ncolony. 1958! In England, they have modified that law, but not in Mauritius. The law has \nstayed the same with just some modifications made. \nWe have just celebrated the 57th anniversary of our independence, and yet a law that \nwas passed in 1958, that is, 67 years ago, still applies for the registration of electors. We \nknow, Madam Speaker, that the right to vote is enshrined in our Constitution. Section 44 of \nthe Constitution provides that every citizen shall be entitled to vote if he/she is registered as \nan elector in a constituency. The first step in a democracy is to make sure that people can \nvote; those who are registered should be able to vote. Madam Speaker, I have already said all \nthis; I am not going to go through all this.  \nThe Municipal Town Councils have already been dissolved; I think they should have \nbeen dissolved yesterday. So, we are going to have the writ, and they will have 5 days after \nthe writ to be able to register again.  \nTo quote Albie Sachs, he said – \n“The disadvantage of the present system is that if elections are held after 16 August \n[which I just said], that person cannot vote until he is re-registered on 15 August of \nthe following year.’’ \nFurther, he does also say that this house-to-house inquiry depends on the canvassing officers \nto reach the homes of people when they are there. \nMadam Speaker, we find it unacceptable; it is an assault on democracy to deny \nanybody his/her right to vote. With this Bill, as I said, we are correcting this injustice. Voting \n\n91 \n \nis a civic duty; we should not deprive any citizen of his or her right to vote. Madam Speaker, \nI want to quote somebody else, John Lewis, who was a civil rights leader; he has passed \naway. He said – \n“The right to vote is precious (…) It is the most powerful nonviolent tool [that we have] \nin a democratic society. We must [be able to] use it.” \nAs a responsible Government, this is exactly what we are doing.  \nNow, Part IIA of the Act provides for the compilation of the supplementary register, \nwhich will be an addendum to the main register. As I said, people who are already on the \nmain register will not be allowed to go on that other register. The Electoral Commissioner, I \nmust say, was of the view that the introduction of a supplementary register directly addresses \nthe key issue of voter suppression. It ensures that eligible citizens who were not on the list are \nable to go on the list. The Electoral Supervisory Commission was also consulted and \nwelcomed this move.  \nI must also say, Madam Speaker, that this Bill contains adequate safeguards to prevent \nfraudulent or erroneous registrations. Provision is made under the new section 39F of the Bill \nfor objections to be raised against entries in the supplementary register. The procedure for \nraising an objection is clearly outlined in the Bill, and if somebody is not satisfied, he can go \nto a Judge in Chambers to get redress if he/she thinks there has been some fraud. \nWe are also additionally making it an offence to make false statements. It is already an \noffence, but we are making it punishable by a fine not exceeding Rs10,000 and a term of \nimprisonment not exceeding one year. \nMadam Speaker, different democracies in the world have different practices concerning \nregistration. In the United States, they allow qualified citizens to register and cast their vote \non the day of the election itself. I do not know how they manage to do this; maybe the \nElectoral Commissioner could tell us because it is not an easy task to be able to register on \nthe same day. It has loopholes. \nOthers have a continuous voter registration. Australia closes its electoral roll seven days \nafter an election is called. But the success of any electoral reform also depends on the local \nspecificities to be taken into account. We all know; we all agree that democracy should be \ninclusive. The fundamental principle is that every eligible citizen should have an equal \nopportunity to vote. With the dissolution of the Municipal City Council and Municipal Town \n\n92 \n \nCouncils yesterday, we now move to the upcoming municipal elections, where the \nsupplementary register will play a crucial role. \nWe should not allow a democratic process to be hindered for administrative reasons or \noutdated systems. By extending the voter registration period, we are reaffirming our \ncommitment to a more inclusive and representative democracy; one that truly reflects the \nvoices of all the people. Madam Speaker, I should also say some people might ask, ‘But why \nthis idea of keeping the boxes overnight’? The reason being, a long time ago, there was no \nelectricity in the villages. They did not want to count with the candles because when counting \nwith candles, you never know if some ballots could either inadvertently or deliberately be put \non fire; it is not an impossibility. Counting on the same day is modernising our system, and as \nI said, this has to be done by regulations; there is no need for a law. \nLet me end, Madam Speaker. As I said, voter suppression is resorted to in many so-\ncalled democracies. This is the new trick now: to have elections but have electoral fraud at \nthe same time.  \nIn a democracy, there is no higher treacherous act than stealing an election. We should \nnot forget that la voix du peuple, c’est la voix de Dieu. \nWith these words, I commend the Bill to the House. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Again, I need it to be seconded. \nDr. Boolell rose and seconded. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Boolell.  \nOkay we carry on. Yes, hon. Mr A. Duval! Everybody will be getting 10 minutes as \nfrom now. \n(4.42 p.m.) \nMr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne Longue): Thank \nyou, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker: That is my job; part of my job. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, it is a good thing that we are finally aligning ourselves \nwith other prominent democratic countries, especially let us not forget since so many electors \nhave been left out of elections, have been deprived of the right to vote during the past \nelections. If we look at 2014, the figures speak of something like 9000; if you look at 2019, \n\n93 \n \nthe figures are even more shocking – 45,000 electors left out and for many of which did not \nchange their residency and was therefore extremely unfair to leave out electors who, in-\nbetween 16 June of the preceding year and the upcoming elections, were not aware or did not \nverify through omission or negligence whether or not they were on the Election Roll. \nSo, we are correcting a grave injustice to democracy and in fact, the PMSD together \nwith the Labour Party and the MMM, let us not forget co-wrote and co-signed the letter to the \nElectoral Commissioner on 24 April 2023.  \nIn fact, the PMSD has been advocating for keeping the registration of electors, the \nroom open up until the last minute, like in the UK. In the UK, as you may know, Madam \nSpeaker, it is up to 12 days before the election. Here, it will be five days after the writ of \nelection. It will be sufficient to catch all those persons who have been left out.  \nI heard the Prime Minister – I do apologise, I came in late. I was preparing my speech – \nbut I have to deplore the fact that the reason behind this amendment being brought for this \nMunicipal Election is first of all for the young generation of electors who have either turned \n18 after 16 June of last year or who are about to turn 18 by the time that they are still eligible \nto be registered on the supplementary register. \nHowever, Madam Speaker, we are catering for the new generation with archaic \nmeasures. Instead of doing like other countries of allowing for online registration, as was \npleaded by the hon. Prime Minister, the Deputy Prime Minister and the Leader of PMSD to \nthe Electoral Commission, that online registration of electors becomes a reality, it is a shame \nthat this is not the case.  \nMadam Speaker, the system that we have in place today with MauPass, for example, \nwhich is secure enough to allow for the Civil Status Office to apply and to hand over birth \ncertificates, or the DPP’s Office to apply and to receive a Certificate of Character. Very \nsensitive document. If the system is enough good for that, it would have been good enough \nfor electors to register. The system exists. It is in place and it is used by hundreds of \nthousands of Mauritians, mainly the youth. Let us not forget that participation at Municipal \nElections, unfortunately, tends to have lower participation, especially from the youth. Now, \nwe are going to require them to firstly, call at the local electorate desk to register themselves, \nand then, of course, to get registered. I think there has been sufficient time since this has been \ncontemplated as far back as April 2023. We had sufficient time to do so. So, for me, c’est une \nopportunité ratée pour le gouvernement.  \n\n94 \n \nMadam Speaker, the other issue, le problème le plus important qui a attiré l’attention \ndes Mauriciens dans son intégralité reste le fait que les électeurs, les résidents ressortissants \ndes pays issus du Commonwealth, puissent, de par notre constitution, être éligibles pour \ns’enregistrer comme des électeurs. D’ailleurs, il suffit de consulter les formes qui restent \ninchangées sous cet amendement. La Forme I, par exemple, si l’on objecte à l’enregistrement \ndes électeurs, cette forme I ou H parle que l’on peut objecter si la personne n’est pas issue \nd’un pays du Commonwealth.  \nLe bureau du commissaire électoral est obligé d’appliquer cette provision de la \nconstitution. L’agent du commissaire électoral qui est responsable pour l’enregistrement des \nélecteurs est obligé, s’il reçoit des informations par la loi, d’enregistrer quiconque qui a \nacquis le statut de résident et qui a eu plus de deux ans sur le territoire, à compter du 1er \njanvier ; deux ans avant d’enregistrement, d’être enregistré. Donc, il peut être non seulement \nun électeur, mais il peut aussi se présenter comme un candidat aux élections municipales, \nvillageoises ou régionales. Donc, voilà, l’opportunité ratée de ce gouvernement. On a promis, \nici, de changer ! \nMadam Speaker : Excusez-moi, je n’ai pas bien suivi le deuxième raisonnement. \nC’est-à-dire que vous êtes contre ? \nMr A. Duval : Non, je m’explique, Madame la présidente. Si je peux m’exprimer. \nMadam Speaker: Allez-y!  \nMr A. Duval : Merci. Donc, je disais, une opportunité ratée, manquée, encore une fois, \naurait été de venir avec un amendement de la constitution pour changer cette section 42 – \n‘Qualification of electors’ et de retirer cette provision archaïque. D’ailleurs, il faut se rappeler \nque c’est le PMSD qui a emmené cela, ici, dans la Chambre. Il faut se rappeler ! Cette \nprovision archaïque qu’est la section 42 de la constitution qui prévoit, bien sûr, que suffit \nd’être ressortissant d’un pays du Commonwealth – et la liste est longue –, on devient un \nélecteur. \nÀ croire l’honorable Uteem, le manque de main-d’œuvre à Maurice demandant \nl’importation de main d’œuvre étrangère va continuer d’accroitre ce problème pour les \nélections d’avenir. Et la question que je pose au Premier ministre : pourquoi n’a-t-il pas jugé \nbon, fort de sa majorité de 64, d’apporter ce simple amendement ? Simplement d’amender la \nsection 42 pour enlever le droit à tous les citoyens d’un pays du Commonwealth de participer \naux élections.  \n\n95 \n \n(Interruptions) \nD’enlever le droit, oui ! \nMadam Speaker: C’est ce que je n’ai pas compris. Ce n’est pas clair ! \nMr A. Duval : Le Premier ministre lui-même a fait campagne sur le fait qu’on a laissé \nles travailleurs étrangers voter en 2019. Si je ne me trompe pas, ce paragraphe est un \nparagraphe important de son propre challenge dans sa pétition électorale, notamment le droit \ndes étrangers. Alors, Madame la présidente, c’est dommage ! \n(Interruptions) \nLe fait reste, Madame la présidente, qu’avec 64 députés, c’est une occasion ratée parce \nque le changement, c’est pour tout de suite. Ce n’est pas pour les élections d’après. Vous \navez été élus – un gouvernement avec un mandat de changer les choses maintenant. Il y a eu \ntellement d’occasions. On parlait d’un collège électoral ; ce sera pour après. Tant de choses \nqu’on a reléguées pour après ! Malheureusement, on permettra, encore une fois, aux \nressortissants étrangers de voter pour des élections municipales. \nMadam Speaker: Que ceux du Commonwealth, et non pas les autres ! \nMr A. Duval: I am sorry? \nMadam Speaker: Que ceux du Commonwealth, et non pas les autres.  \nMr A. Duval: Je parle du Commonwealth, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: J’ai cru un moment que vous vouliez donner aux autres le droit de \nvote. \nMr A. Duval: Non, vous avez mal cru, Madame la présidente !  \nMadam Speaker: Let me do my job! \nMr A. Duval: Donc, pour moi, c’est là où le bât blesse ! Si on apporte des \nchangements à notre système électoral, qu’on le fasse en profondeur. Parce que, encore une \nfois, nous avons un document du 24 avril 2023 où de très bonnes propositions ont été faites. \nMadam Speaker: Je vous donne encore une minute ! \nMr A. Duval: Je suis content d’entendre que le same day counting, le comptage le \nmême jour et le dépouillement deviendront une réalité. Il n’a pas été précisé, j’espère que \ncela se fera dans un centre de dépouillement par circonscriptions. J’espère que ce sera le cas \n\n96 \n \npour permettre plus facilement de garder un contrôle sur les boîtes et sur le comptage quand \ntoutes les boîtes seront emmenées dans un centre de vote. Le Premier ministre ne l’a pas \nspécifié. Et aussi, pour préserver l'anonymité des endroits qui ont voté par rapport à leurs \nintentions de vote. Parce que pour un politicien, c’est très mauvais de savoir si telle ou telle \nécole de vote a voté avec ou contre lui. C’est pour cela que quand il y a un dépouillement \ndans un centre de vote, il est impossible de savoir d’où les ballottes sortent parce que le tout \nest cassé et est mélangé. Mais s’il y a le comptage dans les écoles de vote, ce sera très facile. \nMadam Speaker: Vous avez terminé ? Je vous ai donné une minute encore. Vous avez \ndéjà une minute en plus là. \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: Madame la présidente, une autre chose bien sûr, c’est l’importance et \nl’occasion ratée d’organiser les élections… \nAn hon. Member : Kot inn rate ! \n(Interruptions) \n…des Collectivités locales le même jour, que ce soit pour les municipales, que ce soit pour \nles villageoises… \nMadam Speaker: D’accord. \nMr A. Duval: Cela aussi est important. \nMadam Speaker: D’accord. \nMr A. Duval: Pour finir, Madame la présidente, si vous me permettez de conclure… \nMadam Speaker: Je vous ai déjà donné votre point en plus. Allez-y ! \nMr A. Duval: On rattrapera sur la dernière fois ! \nMadam Speaker: Non, non, on compte… \nMr A. Duval: Madame la présidente, pour finir… \nMadam Speaker: You cannot bring it over! \nMr A. Duval: Pour finir, Madame la présidente… \nMadam Speaker: Allez-y ! \nMr A. Duval: … c’est dommage qu’on nous a promis un changement… \n\n97 \n \n(Interruptions) \n…et un changement qui se fait de goutte à goutte. Le changement ce n’est pas pour cette fois-\nci, ce sera pour après. Ce sera probablement par une autre équipe finalement ! Alors, c’est \ndommage que le changement intervienne en goutte à goutte, et avec… \nMadam Speaker: Vous avez dit… \nMr A. Duval: …et avec une lenteur ! Merci, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Je vous remercie. \n(Interruptions) \nJe vous remercie ! \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Attorney General! \n(4.54 p.m.) \nThe Attorney General (Mr G. Glover, SC): Madam Speaker… \nMadam Speaker: A lot of speeches today! \nMr Glover: I have listened with great interest to the… \n(Interruptions) \n…intervention of my learned friend… \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Glover: …of the Bar, but I think he is labouring under a strong misapprehension of \nwhat the law says. Commonwealth citizens cannot vote at municipal elections! \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Goal! Own goal! \nMr Glover: This Bill, Madam Speaker… \n(Interruptions) \n…is in fact, a landmark piece of legislation as this will ensure that qualified unregistered \npersons will, once registered after the issue of writs of elections for the forthcoming \nMunicipal City Council and Municipal Town Council elections, have the opportunity to cast \n\n98 \n \ntheir votes at those elections, thus guaranteeing that they are not deprived of their \nconstitutional rights to vote. Of course, Mauritians and Mauritians only! \nAn hon. Member: Only! \nMr Glover: Madam Speaker, many of the orators in this House today will share their \nopinions on the amendments that are being proposed to this Act. Much will be said on the \nneed for those amendments and it would greatly surprise me if there is any pushback since \nthere is a consensus amongst Members on the advancements of democratic standards. I will \nnot tread the path that many today will take but rather give my opinion on the legal aspects of \nthe Bill, especially on the tight deadlines that have been proposed for registration after the \nissue of writs for the forthcoming municipal elections. \nMadam Speaker, it is clearly spelt out in the Explanatory Memorandum of the Bill, the \nmain object of this legislation, which is to amend the RPA, is to provide for a supplementary \nregister of electors for each electoral area, that is, a supplementary register that will be an \naddendum to the register of electors, already in force, for a particular year and for a particular \nelectoral area. \nMadam Speaker, the idea seems to be very simple but Members of this House will \nappreciate that this simple amendment to have a supplementary register, carries with it a lot \nof legal implications.  \nAccording to regulation 3(2)(b) of the Municipal City Council and Municipal Town \nCouncil Elections Regulations 2012, the nomination day shall be held not less than 15 days \nand not more than 30 days after the day on which the writs of elections for the holding of the \nMunicipal elections are issued. Therefore, Madam Speaker, there is a minimum window of 15 \ndays before nomination day and during that tight schedule, the Office of the Electoral \nCommissioner will have to ensure that, on the eve of nomination day, the supplementary \nregister of electors is published. \nMadam Speaker, allow me to explain the legal implications. As per clause 5 of the Bill \nin the proposed new section 39D(1), a person who claims to be eligible to be registered as an \nelector in an electoral area shall not later than five days after the issue of the writs of \nelections, present his claim to the Registration Officer of that electoral area. So, if writs are \nout for example tomorrow, on Wednesday 19 March, the five days will extend to Monday 24 \nand I have been reliably informed that the Registration Offices set up by the Electoral \n\n99 \n \nCommissioner will be opened on Saturday and Sunday to ensure full compliance with these \nprovisions.  \nAfter that preliminary registration exercise is carried out during the prescribed period of \nfive days, the Registration Officer, in accordance with the proposed new section 39E, shall, \nnot later than two days after the expiry of the five-day period, publish a supplementary list of \nclaimants who appear to the Registration Officer to be qualified to be registered as electors. \nThe supplementary list of claimants, as they are called under the Act, will be published \nfor public inspection for a period of two days, and the reason behind same is to allow a \nperson whose name appears on a register or supplementary list of claimants in that electoral \narea to object to the registration of a claimant as an elector. Any objection, Madam Speaker, \nwill have to be made during the two days of publication and that is as per section 39F(2) of \nthe new RPA of the supplementary list of claimants.  \nIf it appears to the Registration Officer that the objection is frivolous and there is no \nmerit, he will reject the objection, but in case he admits the objection, he will have, in \naccordance to the new proposed 39G, a duty, to serve, the following day after receiving the \nobjection, a notice on the person in respect to whose registration the notice of objection is \ngiven, calling upon that person to show cause why his name should not be expunged.  \nThat person will then have two days within which he will have to appear before the \nRegistration Officer and show cause why his name should appear on the supplementary \nregister.  \nAfter hearing the objection, the Registration Officer will have one day to decide on the \nobjection and he will thereafter have to make all necessary corrections to the supplementary \nlist of claimants and do everything necessary to compile that list so corrected into a \nsupplementary register, and this supplementary register must be ready at least one day before \nnomination day. \nAs explained earlier, after the issue of writs, there are five days for an unregistered \nperson to claim to be registered. However, in case there is no objection, the Registration \nOfficer will, as soon as practicable, publish the supplementary register. But if there is \nobjection, there are certain procedures to be followed as we have set out earlier and from the \nfirst day the registration exercise starts, 13 days will lapse until the Registration Officer \ndecides on the objection. These tight schedules have been rendered necessary so as to respect \nthe 15 days period prior to nomination day. \n\n100 \n \nMadam Speaker, the procedures that I have enumerated above are not new. We are not \ninventing a new procedure for the registration of electors. These procedures already exist in \nthe existing Representation of the People Act, more specifically with regard to the \ncompilation of registers under sections 9 to 25 of the law. The only difference with the \ncompilation of the register and that of the supplementary register is the time limit provided \nfor objections and similarly for the compilation of a supplementary register, the time limits \nare shorter given that it has to be done at least one day prior to nomination day. \nOn another important note, I wish to inform the House that if an objector is still \ndissatisfied with the decision of the Registration Officer to include the name of a person \nwhose name has been objected to in the supplementary register, he still has the right under \nsection 36 to make an appeal to the Judge in Chambers to have that name expunged from the \nsupplementary register. However, Madam Speaker, as is currently provided with regards to an \nappeal made to the Judge in Chambers to have a name expunged from the register, the right \nof a person whose name is for the time being on the supplementary register to vote at the \nforthcoming municipal elections will not be prejudiced by the appeal, and a vote given at \nthose elections in pursuance of that right will be as valid and effective as if no such appeal \nwere pending and shall not be affected by the subsequent decision of the appeal. \nI have therefore brushed on the legal implications attached to the registration of \nunqualified persons on the register and supplementary register, and as stated earlier however, \nthe idea to have a supplementary register appears to be easy. Yet, there are some hurdles to \novercome and I can assure the House that all the legal implications have been carefully \nscrutinised and addressed.  \nLast but not least, I wish to inform the House that this process to provide for a \nsupplementary register will not only be made available for the forthcoming municipal \nelection but it may also be extended to other elections by prescribing same by way of \nregulations in virtue of the new section 39B of the Bill.  \nThe hon. Prime Minister has also stated that there will be same-day counting and the \nhon. Members will have seen that this is not provided for in the amendments proposed to the \nHouse today. The reason is very simple. The appropriate amendments will be made to the \nregulations in order to render this possible. \nTo conclude, Madam Speaker, I wish to draw the attention of the House and especially \nto those persons whose name already appear on the register of electors that came into force \n\n101 \n \non 16 August 2024, that they will not be eligible to have their names on the supplementary \nregister, even if they claim that they are no longer residents of a particular electoral area. This \nregistration exercise will not permit an elector already registered in an electoral area to be \nregistered in another electoral area as this supplementary register will apply to only those \nqualified, unregistered electors, more specifically but not only to those who have attained the \nage of 18 on/after 16 August 2024 and for those who will attain the age of 18 one day prior to \nnomination day of the forthcoming municipal elections. So, the claim can be made even \nbefore you are 18, provided you turn 18 before nomination day. \nWith these words, I commend this Bill to the House. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Thank you for being well within time. Now, I will \nsuspend the Sitting for half an hour. \nAt 5.04 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.41 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister of Housing! \n(5.41 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Housing and Lands (Mr S. Mohamed): Thank you, Madam \nSpeaker.  \nI have listened with a lot of interest to the intervention of hon. A. Duval in the \nOpposition. I must, at the outset, say that it is a very important piece of legislation, as the \nhon. Prime Minister has explained and as the hon. Attorney General has expatiated upon.  \nWhen a piece of legislation comes in order to make it possible for people to adhere to \nthe concept of the right to vote, when you have a piece of legislation that comes to open up \nthe possibility of those who have been left out to get back on this electoral register, it is \nindeed a fundamental piece of legislation.  \nYou see, it takes me back to the time when I was to read the Constitution. When you \nread the Constitution of Mauritius, you go through the various chapters, you go through the \nvarious themes in the Constitution of Mauritius, you come across the issue of elections; you \ncome across this very important fundamental right. Another part of the Constitution talks \n\n102 \n \nabout the position that is occupied by the Leader of the Opposition, that of the Prime \nMinister, that of the President, and of you, Madam Speaker.  \nTherefore, it is important, in my humble view, that the hon. Leader of the Opposition \nsays something on this piece of legislation. As I said, it concerns le droit de vote, les jeunes \nqui n’ont pas pu s’enregistrer ou les jeunes qui n’auront pas eu l’occasion de se retrouver \nsur cette liste ou ceux qui n’ont pu se retrouver sur cette liste pour diverses raisons. C’est \nune loi d’importance fondamentale. Et quand je regarde la liste des orateurs et que je vois \navec effroi que celui qui se retrouve dans la Constitution de l’île Maurice ne daigne même \npas être présent, ne daigne même pas participer, nous donner un peu son opinion sur this \npiece of legislation of utmost importance, I wonder what has this Opposition ended up \nbecoming. Now, I should not wonder much because as a piece of government, they were \nsomething else. Now, think about it, you cannot expect better when they are in the \nOpposition! \nYou see, if he had been here or if he had thought it important to at least earn his pay by \nparticipating; or at least sit quietly, if you have nothing to say; or you do not know what to \nsay, be present. He decided to walk himself out and not participate in the debate. What a \nshame! What a shame! And this is what they believe: they want to challenge us in the \nforthcoming Municipal elections. Interesting! \nNow, before I go back to him in a minute, let me just say that I have come across, in my \nresearch, some very important documents that show that the Electoral Commissioner’s Office \nhas been working very hard on this very concept voter registration. It has produced \ndocuments. It has had workshops on this issue. I have come across certain documents that \nhave eventually been put in the form of representations that have been sent to Government. \nBack in 2014, on the eve of us losing the 2014 Elections, who, therefore, would have been in \npossession of those remarks of the Office of the Electoral Commission? It would be the \ngovernment led by Sir Anerood Jugnauth, Pravind Jugnauth, Joe Lesjongard, Xavier Duval – \nall of them were in that government!  \nWhat did that document say? Part of those recommendations was precisely drawing \nattention to the principles that must be adhered to when registering voters and compiling and \nmaintaining a voters’ roll. It talked about the importance of the rule of law, integrity, \ninclusiveness, legitimacy, accuracy.  \n\n103 \n \nAnd on the chapter of accuracy, Madam Speaker, it says that the information in the \nvoters’ roll must be valid, accurate and up-to-date. This is precisely what this Government is \ndoing, ensuring that it is up-to-date and not information that is old already. That is why I say, \nI say it again, a fundamental piece of legislation with the objective of ensuring accuracy of \nthe voters’ roll. The system must ensure that ineligible persons are removed from the voters’ \nroll such as deceased persons; that a voter must also only appear once on the national \ncommon voters’ roll and that is, for the voting district in which he or she has registered. \nMadam Speaker, what did the MSM do when they were in power and in alliance with \nthe PMSD? What did they do? What did they do with the then hon. Collendavelloo? What \ndid they do when hon. Obeegadoo was there? What did they do when they had those \nrepresentations, and not once but several times from the Electoral Commissioner’s Office? \nDid they at least pay heed to those observations, that there had to be changes brought to the \nlaw in order to ensure that there was a rule of law, integrity, inclusiveness, legitimacy, \naccuracy, comprehensiveness, accessibility, transparency, security, information privacy steps, \netc? He just sent representations but the MSM ignored those representations but it is this \nGovernment that has decided to come up; this Prime Minister, this team that has come up \nwith changes to the law in order to ensure that people who would have been forgotten, for \nstatutory reasons but nonsensical in the process, are brought back and caught back and are \nallowed to vote. Fundamental! Historical!  \nLet me come back to the reasons why, not only because of the absence of the Leader of \nthe Opposition, former Minister, the absence of hon. A. Duval, the least he should have done \n– he has spoken, allow me to rebut him – he should have been present. He was even Speaker \nonce upon a time. He does not even know l’abc. I call it good manners.  \n(Interruptions) \n \nBut then, you see, the then Leader of the Opposition, on 23 May 2023 – it brings me \nback to the previous mandate – when he was in government…when he was in the Opposition \n– I am just being confused because he just keeps jumping and changing beds – what did he \nsay in his speech? Condemning the previous government. Those are the reasons why I am \nsaying to this House and I am saying it for the people outside to listen to what I say. There \nare the reasons, many reasons, but here, only two reasons why I say to you, do not listen and \n\n104 \n \ndo not believe what the Opposition are going to blurt out because they are clearly \ninconsistent, incompetent, and whatever they say, is not even the truth.  \nLook at what the then Leader of the Opposition said in his speech in a debate that took \nplace in this august Assembly, Debate No. 08 of 2023, and I quote – \n“So, for all these reasons, Mr Speaker, Sir, I ask the Vice-Prime Minister, I ask the \nGovernment to withdraw this Bill.” \nWhat Bill was it? To postpone election for the third time. \nHe said – \n“Let democracy win, let democracy proceed and let the people choose freely who they \nwant to bring about all these changes that I have suggested.” \n \nAnd, yes, the people chose freedom. The people chose us to bring those changes. The \npeople chose those who are in the right and condemned those who were in the wrong. And \nthis very then Leader of the Opposition decided to jump in bed with those very people that he \ncriticised to be against democracy. How could you, in Parliament, say, let democracy win, \nand what he is saying is that ‘those are the very people who are not for democracy’, and you \njump in the same bed with them? You take your team and you jump in with them? Thank \nGod, there were those who did not want to follow him in that bed – some of them are here. \n \nWhat about the absent Leader of the Opposition? I shall conclude on that. You know \nwhat he said? I will say it again, you cannot believe him, you should not even believe him. \nListen to him if you wish, but then again, he is not here. How can we hear? What did he say \nin that very debate, and I quote – \n« L’alliance Ramgoolam/Bérenger/Duval, allons le reconnaître, pa morde zordi sa ! Et \nécoutez-moi, M. le président, – je vais terminer là-dessus parce que je n’ai pas \nbeaucoup de temps (…) » \nTellement il n’a pas de temps, il n’est même pas là ! \n« (…) lors des prochaines élections, le peuple mettra un terme définitif à la carrière \npolitique de deux personnes surtout, l’honorable Paul Bérenger et Navin Ramgoolam. » \n\n105 \n \nOh my God! If you were wrong then, why do you believe that you are right today? You were \nwrong then; we were right then. We are right today, you are wrong again, Sir!  \nSo, when history will judge, it will look in the Hansard and it will say, okay, what did \nthe Opposition said? Oh, the Leader of the Opposition, who is supposed to represent those \nwho voted against this Government, whom the former Prime Minister, Pravind Jugnauth, \nmost probably, somewhere in some kitchen, decided that it should be him, was not here but \nhow is he going to justify his salary at the end of this month?  \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Dr. Aumeer! Yes! \n(5.52 p.m.) \nDr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis Central): Thank \nyou, Madam Speaker. \nThe main objective of this Bill that is being presented to the House today is to have a \nsupplementary register of electors be it for Municipal Council or City elections or any other \nelection.  \nIt has its high importance in Municipal Elections which has been the bed rock of some \nparliamentarians, namely former Mayors, hon. Nagalingum and hon. Bhagwan, who are now \nMembers of the Cabinet.  \nWe have to know why we have such a Bill. The purpose of the Bill is to ensure that \nevery eligible elector in this country has access to the right to vote and has access to the \ndemocratic process of the election. We will be learning from lessons of the past because that \nBill, once passed, will show us what has happened in the past when people, when electoral \nvoters, who were supposed to be on the list, did not have a chance to exercise their \ndemocratic right, which is a constitutional one to exert their power. This Government does \nnot want anyone to be deprived of that constitutional right to vote. \nMadam Speaker, the power of a voter should not be underestimated. It is through the \nstroke of a pen that these voters decide who they want and when they want to send whom and \nwhere, either to the Parliament or in Local Government Councils. We do know the power of \nthe pen; how effective it was in November 2024 – unfortunately, the opposition is not here – \n\n106 \n \nwhen they have been swept out completely like a tsunami and they have disappeared. Today, \nthey are not even here to listen to what we have to say! That pen is so powerful and the \npeople of this country know the effect of how they are going to use the pen. During the \nNovember 2024 elections, there were concerns. People were buying their own pens because \nthey were concerned that they were erasable ones and that they could be used to sway the \ncourse of election.  \nThis supplementary list, Madam Speaker, will have names added to it for those who are \nnot on the registered list, for those who will attain the age of 18 by Nomination Day and who \nbona fide fulfil the criteria of electors. Such a Bill, therefore, puts our Government \nProgramme at the heart of a vibrant democracy and strengthens our democratic values. If we \nlook at the Government Programme ‘A Bridge to the Future’, it is very clear that the \nGovernment is committed to put on track the very founding principles of our parliamentary \ndemocracy.  \nMadam Speaker, I will now come to why I said we should learn from the lessons of the \npast. In 2019, the Alliance that was led by the Labour Party with at its head, the current Prime \nMinister, Dr. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, was tipped to win the general elections. We all \nknow what happened afterwards. We lost. Various reasons were put forward. There were \nvarious means of explaining and views to say why we lost. But there was one fundamental \ncause, an aspect of that loss: figures. The figures of registered electoral members.  \nLet us look briefly at figures. It is well known that within two elections of a five-year \nperiod, particularly when you look between 2009 and 2014, there is a swing of approximately \n50,000 to 60,000 new electors. It has always been that way. But from 2014 to 2019, there was \nonly 4,744 new electors. Where have all these new electors gone? Where did they disappear? \nWhy were they not registered? Who made sure they were not registered? I am told that \napproximately 136,000 people, eligible to be registered as voters in 2019, did not have the \nchance to exercise their right, which makes approximately 14.9% of the population who was \nentitled to vote. Within the 136,000 – people who have gathered the right statistics –, 50,000 \nwere disfranchised from the list. \nMadam Speaker, the people who were disfranchised, be it deliberately because of their \nallegiance to one particular party or the intention to sway the votes and against the will of the \ngovernment in power or political gerrymandering by some, did make sure that these people \ndid not have a chance to exercise their constitutional right. Unfortunately for them! Now, it \n\n107 \n \nwill be a golden opportunity whereby every person who feels he has not had the chance to be \nregistered, will be able to do so. Let alone in this forthcoming Local Government Election, \nbut I am sure in other elections, where on the day the writs of election would be issued, they \nwill have the time to do so. \nMadam Speaker, a swing of 50,000 between 2019 and 2014, and then, we saw only \n4,900. But what happened in 2019? When we look at the registered list, we once again have a \nswing of new electors of approximately 50,000. Why 50,000? Because the population at large \nin this country has been made aware; they are alert, they are eager, they want to exercise their \nright. They were fed up with that government. They all made sure they used the app that the \nElectoral Office has to ensure that they were on the list. It was very difficult for those who \nhad absurd political motives to disfranchise them. Today, this Bill will give to those bona fide \nelectors a window of opportunity to engage in the electoral process. \nMadam Speaker, a famous topic – the deceased. We all have heard how some people \nhave been impersonated from time to time during the election to vote for those who are no \nlonger here. In particular, I will quote Constituency No. 10 in 2019 where it has been said \nthat the dead rose from the burial grounds at early hours of the morning to return back in the \nafternoon after having voted. Unbelievable! Such petty minded, deliberate act and cunning \nstrategies and rumours, besides the targeted disfranchising of electors, were used and \norchestrated to ensure that the current Prime Minister did not get elected. Who was at the \nhelm of such uncouth strategies? Nobody else, but a brutal, aggressive, belligerent, ill-\nmannered, rough loudspeaker! Depending on his whims and fancies, he used the same tactics \nagainst the members in this august Assembly, his favourite target being Ms Joanna Bérenger \nand Shakeel Mohamed. \nMadam Speaker, I cannot be more pleased with such a Bill as nobody will be able to \nrob the Mauritian elector of his right to vote. I would like to make two humble suggestions to \nthe mover of the Bill. I heard hon. A. Duval, unfortunately, the way he mentioned it, that the \nway that electoral lists is being compiled is still archaic. He must remember le temps a \névolué, oui. Mais il faut rendre justice à tous ces gens qui, pendant des années depuis notre \nindépendance, ont fait ce détail de registre. Bien sûr, il y aura des améliorations. Mais aller \ndire que c’est archaïque, c’est vraiment grotesque et mal élevé !  \nOnline registration, I am sure, will be considered within the broader framework of \nconstitutional and electoral reforms. So, therefore, my suggestion will be if an online \n\n108 \n \nplatform by the Office of the Electoral Commissioner be made for re-registration of those, \ntogether with an acknowledgement receipt, which can be used as proof during the days of \nelection. Secondly, I am very pertinent on that one, the updated deceased list from the \nDepartment of the Civil Status must be displayed in each voting room so that there is tangible \nevidence of those who cannot vote because they are lying peacefully in their burial grounds.  \nMadame la présidente, pour terminer, les projets de loi de ce gouvernement se \nsuccèdent à un rythme accéléré pour donner un nouvel élan à notre chère démocratie, qui fut \nl’ombre d’elle-même pendant ces cinq dernières années. Certes, il y a une certaine frustration \nde certains qui croient que les choses ne bougent pas assez vite. Mais il faut savoir que notre \nestablishment est miné par ce que j’appelle, vous me permettez de servir ce mot, par des \nchatwas qui font tout pour mettre du bâton dans les roues et faire capoter le changement. Il \nest donc très impératif et important qu’un procès de déménagement avancé soit fait pour \nensuite mettre, comme on dit, the right man in the right place, que ce soit pour les \nnominations ou les autres. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: The right woman! \nMadam Speaker: Yes, right person! \nDr. Aumeer: And the right woman as well! \nMadam Speaker: Right person! \nDr. Aumeer: As Martin Luther King quotes – \n“I say to you today, my friends, that in spite of the difficulties and frustrations of the \nmoment, I still have a dream.” \nAs far as I am concerned, I have a special dream for a better Mauritius, led by the \ncurrent Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Cela fait exactement 10 minutes! \nHon. Bhagwan!  \n(6.03 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change (Mr \nR. Bhagwan): Merci, Madame la présidente. Je ne pourrais ne pas intervenir sur ce projet de \nloi qui concerne l’administration régionale, que ce soit sur les élections et on parle de toute \n\n109 \n \nfaçon de l’administration régionale, des élections régionales. Ayant été moi-même plus 10 \nans conseiller municipal et maire, c’était un des grands moments où vous étiez vous-même \nmaire de Beau Bassin-Rose-Hill.  \nMadame la présidente, après le discours raté du quatrième député correctif de la \ncirconscription No.4 de Port Louis Nord-Montagne Longue, j’aurais souhaité qu’il ait été ici \npour lui dire que j’espère que lui et son parti auront le courage de participer aux élections \nmunicipales, de venir rendre des comptes aux citadins après avoir joui du pouvoir dans les \nmairies pendant tant d’années. Je ne parle pas du leader de l’Opposition, lui aussi, j’espère \nque son parti qui est en hibernation pour le moment aura le courage de venir affronter \nl’électorat des villes où ils ont beaucoup massacré. \nMadame la présidente, le 4 mai prochain, le drapeau de la démocratie régionale ne sera \nplus en berne et il flottera à un nouveau fièrement, je le dis, dans le ciel mauricien. Le \ngouvernement du Changement, à travers le Premier ministre et le travail d’équipe avec le \nDeputy Prime Minister, et avec les membres de la Commission électorale ont fait un travail \nexceptionnel de venir présenter à la population ce projet de loi pour amender la \nRepresentation of the People Act, qui veut envoyer un signal puissant à tous les fossoyeurs \npotentiels de la démocratie.  \nMadame la présidente, avec ce projet de loi la démocratie régionale sera élargie, \napprofondie et protégée, et les deux amendements proposés par le Premier ministre vont dans \nce sens. L’établissement d’un registre supplémentaire des électeurs pour les prochaines \nélections des conseils municipaux garantira que chaque électeur éligible a la possibilité de \nparticiper au processus électoral et que personne ne soit privé de son droit constitutionnel de \nvoter et de se porter candidat. Madame la présidente, ce sont surtout les jeunes qui viennent \nde célébrer l’âge de la majorité qui apporteront du sang neuf à ce corps électoral et j’espère \naussi que de nombreux jeunes brigueront les suffrages. Madame la présidente, plus qu’une \nfleur envers la jeunesse, cet amendement est surtout un acte de foi de ce gouvernement en \nfaveur de l’engagement de plus de jeunes en politique. Notre société fait face à des nouveaux \ndéfis que les générations précédentes n’ont pas vu venir et l’apport de la jeunesse sera un \natout dans la recherche de solutions durables. \nMadame la présidente, le dépouillement des votes le jour du scrutin représente \ndéfinitivement une avancée considérable dans l’organisation des élections libres, \ntransparentes et crédibles. Encore une fois, cet amendement témoigne de notre profonde \n\n110 \n \nconviction que la démocratie doit être constamment approfondie et que la participation de la \npopulation au processus démocratique doit être encouragée en permanence. \nMadame la présidente, la dissolution, hier, des Conseils municipaux par le président de \nla République marque la fin d’une période sombre pour les collectivités locales. Je suis \nheureux que le leader de l’Opposition soit là. La présentation de ce projet de loi inaugure une \nnouvelle ère pour la démocratie régionale. \nEn effet, Madame la présidente, nos mairies ont été plongées dans un coma artificiel \ndepuis 2015 ; un coma politiquement induit qui correspond à un état de perte de la conscience \npolitique et de la sensibilité humaine machiavéliquement orchestré par un gouvernement \nprônant l’autoritarisme. C’est ce que nous avons vu, c’est ce que nous avons vécu le depuis \n2015. Il faut se rappeler, Madame la présidente, que le gouvernement MSM avec la \ncomplicité du PMSD et les anciens traîtres du MMM, avait dès le départ affiché ses \npréférences pour le totalitarisme en amputant unilatéralement le mandat des Conseils élus en \n2012 de presque la moitié. Des élections municipales anticipées furent organisées en 2015 \nquelques mois après les élections générales de 2014. Le MMM avait participé à ces élections. \nEt, ce n’est que dix ans plus tard que les électrices et les électeurs de nos villes se rendront à \nnouveau aux urnes. Zot pou regle zot kont ! Pa gagn traka ! \nDix ans sans élections dans nos villes permettant à certains élus sortants, Madame la \nprésidente, de battre les records de longévité de mandat municipal, mais point de manière \ndémocratique. Nek li asize gagn kas. Dix ans, Madame présidente, sans élections dans nos \nvilles et les citadins ont beaucoup souffert en termes de services. Dix ans, prolongé dans un \nprofond coma artificiel, parce que les pouvoirs des élus – nous, nous avions connus les \npouvoirs des élus locaux – ces pouvoirs ont été confisqués par des PPS – et nous savons tous \nle rôle de ces PPS et les gâteaux Marie – et les ministres. Les mairies furent transformées en \nsuccursales du MSM avec la complicité de certains. Cette bande a été complice dans cette \nconfiscation de la démocratie artificielle. Ce coma artificiel, Madame la présidente, a permis \nla mise au repos des fonctions démocratiques vitales de nos mairies en sevrant leurs liens \navec les communautés de base et en les asphyxiant financièrement et administrativement. \nL’objectif inavoué demeurait cependant le refus et la peur, ils avaient la peur, Madame la \nprésidente, voilà pourquoi ils n’ont pas organisé des élections. Kifer pann organiz eleksyon ? \nLa peur d’affronter les élections libres et transparentes et rezilta ? Ti pou gagn bate !  \n\n111 \n \nCet état végétatif de nos mairies n’a pas été sans conséquence sur la gouvernance et le \ndéveloppement de nos villes ; gestion opaque, transactions douteuses, gaspillage des maigres \nressources tandis que le copinage, n’en parlons pas, et le népotisme furent institutionnalisés \nau détriment de la méritocratie. Pour ceux, Madame la présidente, comme vous et moi, et \ncomme mon ami, Deven Nagalingum, et d’autres qui sont ici présents, qui ont eu l’occasion \nde servir leur ville, l’état de délabrement des nos villes, l’insalubrité permanente, les \ndysfonctionnements chroniques et le vide culturel – à l’époque les mairies organisaient \ndes…, il y avait le Plaza qui était en pleine ébullition, les manifestations culturelles, Madame \nla présidente. Cela fait mal au cœur. N’en parlons plus, Madame la présidente.  \nÇa, c’est un record ! Une adjointe au maire de Vacoas/Phoenix pe sarye valiz, cela c’est \nle dernier exemple, Madame la présidente. Je ne vais pas entrer dans les détails, tout le \nmonde le sait. Sayer valiz pou kisanla ek kouma inn gagn sa ?  \nComment ne pas éprouver de la peine, Madame la présidente, de la tristesse, de la \nconsternation en regardant l’état de la démocratie régionale de nos villes ? Voilà où la \npetitesse d’esprit des politicards orange a conduit nos villes au bord du précipice. Ala zot \nbilan ! Voilà le résultat de la politique revancharde du MSM contre les habitants de nos villes \nparski pann vot zot. Bizin tir revanz.  \nMadame la présidente, vous le savez aussi bien que moi, l’administration régionale de \nnotre pays remonte au milieu du 18e siècle lorsque l’île était encore une colonie française. \nL’île était alors divisée en huit quartiers administrés par les conseils de communes. Pendant la \nrévolution française, les conseils de communes ont été remplacés par les municipalités, \nprésidées par des maires. Les mairies possèdent une longue et riche histoire que nous avons \ndignement célébrée en juillet 1990, vous-même, moi-même ; Jean-Claude de l’Estrac alors, \nd’autres amis, d’autres fanatiques de la démocratie régionale. \nNous avions célébré dignement l’organisation du bicentenaire de l’administration \nrégionale à Rose-Hill en invitant la participation de toutes les mairies, tous les maires et aussi \nceux des conseils de district, parce que c’était un grand événement qui est resté dans les \nannales. Madame la présidente, quel triste déclin pour la démocratie régionale qui a connu \nces  heures de gloire dans le passé ; des grands maires qui ont marqué l’histoire, des grands \nmaires du Parti travailliste, du MMM qui ont marqué l’histoire de ce pays. \nMadame la présidente, je suis sûr qu’il y aura un changement. Le changement va \nvenir ; persone pa pou bare sa. Il faudra commencer par établir un dialogue permanent entre \n\n112 \n \nles mairies et les mandants pour que le développement soit participatif et nous prenons cet \nengagement au niveau de notre alliance. Remettre sur les rails et refaire fonctionner la \nmachinerie municipale pour relancer le développement de nos villes et les sortir de cet \nimmobilisme paralysant de ces 10 dernières années, relancer l’animation sociale, sportive et \nculturelle pour que nos villes soient à nouveau des espaces de convivialité et de solidarité. \nD’ailleurs, Madame la présidente, dans notre programme, nous avons dit, nous ne \nvoulons pas des élus frustrés. Nous ne voulons pas qu’il y ait des conseils sans pouvoir. C’est \npour cela que mon ami et collègue, l’honorable Woochit, travaille sur l’amendement de ce \nprojet de loi. Il y a un comité ministériel dont l’honorable Nagalingum, les autres amis ici \nprésents et moi-même font partie. Nous avons invité des suggestions, venant de toute la \npopulation que ce soit de la ville –urbain ou rurale parce qu’il faut et nous travaillons sur \ncette refonte de l’administration régionale. Il est notre ambition d’aller plus, d’inscrire peut-\nêtre dans la Constitution l’existence de l’administration régionale comme c’est en Sud \nAfrique depuis l’époque que Nelson Mandela était devenu président. J’avais participé à cette \népoque à une première réunion lorsque j’étais ministre des Collectivités locales sous le même \nPremier ministre, l’honorable Dr. Navin Ramgoolam. \nIl m’avait envoyé en Sud Afrique, il m’avait délégué d’aller participer à une réunion. Je \nme rappelle South African Local Governement Appreciation (SALGA) pour la mise sur pied \nde cette organisation, J’avais eu l’occasion à l’époque de rencontrer Nelson Mandela et \nj’avais été partie prenante de l’organisation des réunions de travail pour revoir l’organisation, \nla mise sur pied de leur association des autorités urbaines. Madame la présidente, les \ndernières élections générales ont permis de sauver, in extremis, le pays de la banqueroute \nmorale et financière et maintenant les élections municipales vont nous permettre de sauver la \ndémocratie et nos villes.  \nVoilà ce que j’avais à dire. Vive les Collectivités locales et nous allons participer nous-\nmêmes, comme nous le faisons au niveau du gouvernement à une refonte complète de nos \nvilles qui méritent ce changement. \nMerci, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Merci. Hon. Minister for Youth and Sports! \n(6.17 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Youth and Sports (Mr D. Nagalingum): Madame la présidente, c’est \navec un cœur rempli de fierté que je m’adresse aujourd’hui à cette auguste Assemblée ; cœur \n\n113 \n \nrempli de fierté car nous allons voter un amendement historique. Ce sera une pierre angulaire \ndans l’histoire politique de notre pays. Que faisons-nous aujourd’hui ? Nous redonnons ses \nlettres de noblesse à notre démocratie aux principes fondamentaux qui sont les piliers de \nnotre constitution. La démocratie respire de nouveau. \nMadame la présidente, nous assistons aujourd’hui à la consolidation des principes \nfondamentaux de notre démocratie. Non-seulement notre gouvernement a rétabli les élections \nmunicipales qui auront lieu bientôt et cela après 10 longues années, mais nous allons encore \nplus loin en introduisant cet amendement qui permettra à tous les jeunes qui auront atteint \nleur majorité après août 2024 de s’inscrire sur la liste électorale et même de se présenter \ncomme candidat à ces élections.  \nLe second amendement introduit pour la première fois à Maurice concernant les \nélections municipales s’agit du dépouillement le même jour – le Same Day Counting qui \nconstitue une étape vers la modernisation de notre système électoral. En un mot, c’est un pas \nde géant pour notre démocratie.  \nMadame la présidente, do you imagine what it says of a government which deprives its \ncitizen of the democratic rights and this, during 10 years? They invented all kinds of pretexts \nto postpone those elections twice, depriving around 400,000 of our citizens to choose their \nrepresentatives to administer their city and towns.  \nLa raison de ce renvoi successif était simple. Ils savaient que le peuple en avait marre \nde leurs magouilles, leurs mensonges, leurs conspirations. Le peuple ne voulait plus supporter \nleurs corruptions, leurs passe-droits, leur népotisme et favoritisme mais surtout le peuple \nvoulait les punir pour le vol commis dans la caisse de l’État. \nThey kept in power the same incompetent and corrupt Councillors at the head of our \nLocal Government and this, for pure political plans aiming at controlling all institutions of \nthe country. Even the then Speaker at that time, Members in this House will remember, \nrefused to admit questions on local administration.  \nQuel a été le résultat, Madame la présidente ? Une catastrophe. Nos villes sont \ndevenues des fantômes, des villes mortes. Nos villes ont perdu leur splendeur leur grandeur, \nfini les activités sportives et des loisirs dignes de ce nom. Voilà le résultat de cette politique, \ndécentralisation à l’outrance, pratiquée par l’ancien gouvernement. The last Government \nmode of governing was simple –  \n‘Silence! Nou p gouverne.’ or better ‘Silence ! Nou p kokin.’ \n\n114 \n \nMadame la présidente, cette dernière victoire de 60-0 que le peuple a offerte à ce \ngouvernement est le résultat entre autres des pratiques antidémocratiques de l’ancien \ngouvernement qui a usé et abusé de ses pouvoirs et prérogatives. Ne pouvant plus gouverner \ndémocratiquement, étant depuis longtemps devenu impopulaire, il s’est comporté comme un \nvulgaire usurpateur et a tenté tous les moyens de ballonner la population. Outre le renvoi des \nélections municipales, il a tenté quelques jours avant le jour du vote, d’interdire les réseaux \nsociaux, moyens privilégiés des jeunes pour s’informer et se divertir. Ce fut le coup de grâce \nporté à notre démocratie et les jeunes ne se sont pas laissés faire. \nIls se sont rendus en masse à notre manifestation politique, ils ont voté avec rage contre \nce gouvernement pourri. \n Madame la présidente, allow me to quote Mrs Shirin Ebadi, the 203rd Noble Peace \nPrize winner for a significant and pioneering effort for democracy and human rights. I quote \n– \n“If you want to raise a crop for one year, plant corn. If you want to raise a crop for \ndecades, plant trees. If you want to raise a crop for centuries, raise men. If you want to \nplant a crop for eternities, raise democracies.” \nFurthermore, the second amendment introducing the same day counting is to keep pace \nwith the modernisation of our democratic electoral system. All modern democracies start the \ncounting process immediately after the closing of voting centres. \n Madame la présidente, permettez-moi d’exprimer encore une fois, en tant que membre \nde ce gouvernement et pour toute ma carrière politique, ma profonde reconnaissance au \nPremier ministre et au vice-Premier ministre pour leur passion, leur sagesse dans la gestion \ndes affaires de l’État. Ces amendements à la Representation of the People Act sont une \nnouvelle pierre dans la construction d’une République de Maurice moderne, libre, \ndémocratique et prospère.  \nMadame la présidente, la valeur de nos autorités locales et de nos conseils municipaux \nne devrait pas être surestimée. Ils ne sont pas de simples unités administratives ; ils sont les \npiliers de notre démocratie, les moteurs du développement et les gardiens de nos \ncommunautés. N’oublions pas que les administrations locales ont été les berceaux politiques \npour de nombreux dirigeants mauriciens qui sont devenus députés, ministres, Premier \nministre et même Président de la République par la suite. Citons Sir Seewoosagar \n\n115 \n \nRamgoolam, Cassam Uteem et Rajesh Bhagwan parmi tant d’autres et qui ont débuté leur \ncarrier politique comme conseiller municipal.  \nAvec la volonté du gouvernement central et des équipes passionnées, des femmes et des \nhommes d’expérience, des jeunes remplis de la flamme de faire progresser leurs villes dans \ncette nouvelle municipalité, nos villes deviendront plus propres, et cela, dans tous les sens. Ils \nreprendront vie, retrouveront leur gloire et se moderniseront. Continuons donc à investir dans \nnos conseils municipaux et à les renforcer et à accroître leur capacité à servir le peuple. \nLorsque la démocratie locale prospère, la nation s’épanouit. \n Madame la présidente, pour conclure, permettez-moi de faire un souhait. Je souhaite \nque dans mon discours aujourd’hui, la Chambre et le peuple de notre République retiendront \nsurtout la volonté de ce gouvernement d’être le facilitateur auprès des municipalités et de leur \ndonner tous les moyens pour nettoyer nos villes. Le mot d’ordre est le grand nettoyage dans \nnos villes.  \nMerci, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker : Merci. M. le ministre de la Sécurité sociale, s’il vous plaît ! \n(6.26 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity (Mr A. Subron): Madam Speaker, I know we have a heavy agenda this afternoon. So, rest assured, I \nwill not be long.  \nI just want to spell it loud in this House that this Bill confirms the democratic fibres of \nthe Alliance du Changement programme. I am standing as the spokesperson of Rezistans ek \nAlternativ to express the deep support of my Party to this Bill. \nMadam Speaker, the right to vote is a guaranteed fundamental right in the Constitution \nof Mauritius as well as in Article 25 of the Civil and Political Rights Covenant of the United \nNations, to which Mauritius is a State party. The Constitution, in section 44, relates to the \nright to vote at elections. It says – \n“44. Right to vote at elections \n(1) \nany person who is registered as an elector in a constituency shall be entitled to \nvote in such manner as may be prescribed at any election for that constituency \nunless he is prohibited from so voting by any law in force in Mauritius (…).”  \n\n116 \n \nArticle 25 of the Civil and Political Rights Covenant of the United Nation stipulates \nthat “every citizen shall have the right and opportunity without unreasonable restrictions to \nvote and to be elected at genuine periodic elections.” The Bill aims at registering new electors \nin a supplementary register of electors after the issue of the writ of elections up to the eve of \nthe Nomination Day. \nPreviously, registration of electors was confined to a specific yearly calendar and date \nwhich has been described by other Members of the Parliament. Every register compiled in a \nyear came into force on 16 August in that year and shall remain in force until the next \ncompiled register comes into force. It was this electoral process which was used irrespective \nof date of elections. The Bill changers basically the registration process of electors in \nMauritius. The Bill also ensures fairness as it guarantees the right of any person to challenge \nthe admission of any electors to the supplementary register of electors it proposes to create. \nSignificantly is the fact that this Bill shall apply not only for the coming elections of \nmembers of the Municipal City Council or Municipal Town Council, but also specifies that \nthis Bill opens the door to be applied for such other elections as may be prescribed. This Bill, \nwhich might appear minor in change or even a rather technical change, in essence, is part of \nand in a way completes the very franchise processes started in 1948 when universal suffrage \nwas first introduced in the then colonial Mauritius.  \nThe universal suffrage at the time, in 1948, was only partial as the colonial power had \nthe power to nominate non-elected legislative council members and the right to vote was \nrestricted to only electors who was able to read and write. The 1948 suffrage was enlarged in \n1958 to include all citizens to vote, irrespective of literacy criteria. The system of colonial \nnominees was abolished.  \nIn 1976, the universal suffrage was further enlarged to grant the right to vote the \ncitizens aged 18 years instead of 21 years. All the enlargement processes of the universal \nsuffrage were also translated in Local Government Elections, including Municipal Elections. \nThe recent elections, especially as from 2019 General Elections highlighted the fundamental \nproblem whereby the system of registration of electors was leading to some form of \ndisenfranchisement of thousands of electors. \nIn addition, the criteria to confine electors’ registration to a specific period of time was \nde facto eliminating the otherwise qualified electors from participating in elections. In fact, it \nwas an unreasonable restriction within the meaning of Article 25 of the Civil and Political \n\n117 \n \nRights Covenant of the United Nations to which Mauritius is a State party. The present \namendment is proposing to start from the coming Municipal Elections and is addressing the \nobjective disenfranchisement generated by the registration process under The Representations \nof the People Act.  \nThe Bill in this House is in reality leaping towards a new form of presumptive inclusion \nwhereby the legal and electoral system will protect the voting rights of all subjects by default. \nIn this case, by allowing supplementary register to be opened after the issuing of the writ of \nelections. \nThis amendment inaugurates a series of democratic amendments announced in the \nGovernment Programme adopted by this Assembly. After consolidating the right to vote of \ncitizens in the election, the next anticipated step would be to make the right to stand \ncandidate in general elections as a fundamental right in the Constitution of Mauritius without \nany compulsory community classification. \nThis amendment marks the opening of a new democratic chapter of the Republic of \nMauritius. There are moments in history where what appears to be simple is in fact part of a \ngiant historical process. We are in this historical moment. I appeal to all Mauritians to focus \non the fundamentals, to support the democratic transformation underway and with this note, \nme and my party, Rezistans ek Alternativ commend this Bill to this House. I recommend all-\nqualifying citizens to rush and register themselves for the coming municipal elections. This \nGovernment is widening the franchise while the previous one disenfranchised more than \n400,000 citizens living in municipal areas of their right to vote.  \nI again commend this Bill to the House. Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you for that. Thank you for being well within time.  \nHon. Lobine! \n(6.34 p.m.) \nMr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix): Thank you, Madam \nSpeaker. \nMadam Speaker, I will say a few words on this very important Bill. We have got the \nhon. Prime Minister and the hon. Attorney-General, they have very vividly portrayed the \nimportance of this Bill. The hon. Attorney-General went in length with regards to the legal \ntechnicalities involved in this Bill. But the very fundamental of this Bill, Madam Speaker, is \nthe right to vote, which is a constitutional right embedded in section 44 of our Constitution. \n\n118 \n \nThe way this Bill has been drafted, Madam Speaker, I wish to salute the officers, the State \nLaw Officers, the Attorney-General’s office for this very well drafted, clear and precise piece \nof legislation.  \nMadam Speaker, I would conquer with the hon. Minister Subron with regard to the \nhistorical moment that we are privileged to have in this very august Assembly to debate on \nthis very important piece of legislation. Be it a few clauses that are amending a 1958 \nlegislation, but the importance is paramount to the people of Mauritius. We have heard hon. \nMinister Bhagwan, hon. Minister Nagalingum, yourself, Madam Speaker, you were previous \nmayors of Beau Bassin-Rose Hill, and today, you are hon. Ministers in this very august \nAssembly. So, giving back the power of the people of the townships of all these five towns \nand the city of Port Louis to vote in the near future is a big achievement in itself when we \nknow in this very august Assembly how municipal elections were postponed on three \noccasions for no reason. The last one was that they were preparing a very comprehensive \npiece of legislation but to no avail. There have been no major reforms that they did and they \njust postponed because they knew very well that the people were waiting for them, were \nwaiting to give them an electoral correction. I salute the team of hon. Minister Woochit and \nthe Interministerial Committee that are looking at a comprehensive legislation for the local \nelections and the local authorities. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to the right to vote to the youngsters that will turn 18 just \none day before the next Municipal elections is a big step towards a participative democracy, \nand we know how the youth of this country participated in bringing the Alliance du \nChangement in this very august Assembly with an overwhelming majority. Today, I am very \nsad to see that well, the hon. Leader of the Opposition is present but he has not participated in \nthe debate, very important piece of legislation and a lack of decorum from hon. Adrien \nDuval. I will not comment on his exposé because it was most of the time irrelevant to the \nsubject matter of this present Bill. But it is unfortunate, lack of decorum, lack of respect to \nthis august Assembly that he is not even present when he has debated on this very Bill, to \nlisten to the other orators. This is a lack of respect to democracy, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker, with regards to the municipal elections in a few weeks’ time, I would \nlike here to pay a particular tribute to the hon. Prime Minister, to the hon. Deputy Prime \nMinister and to the Cabinet of Ministers that they are walking the talk because coming with \nanother amendment to another big piece of legislation, a 1958 piece of legislation in a very \nfew months is a big step forward to consolidate our democracy. Madam Speaker, I was \nlooking at the debates in 1958 whereby several orators at that time, the Bill was presented on \n\n119 \n \n10 June 1958 by the then hon. Attorney-General, hon. Lavoipierre, and I found a paragraph \nthat is very interesting from the then Ministerial Secretary to the Treasury, the then Dr. \nRamgoolam, and I will conclude with what he said, which is very relevant today itself – \n“Constitutions, I think, Sir, should safeguard the interest of the people. May I make \nbold to say that it preserves to my mind, the rights and privileges of every citizen. \nEvery citizen henceforth will have the same right in law, in practice and in other ways. \nI think that it is a good thing. I do not think that anyone today can argue that universal \nsuffrage is not right, that universal suffrage is not practicable because a man or a \nwoman cannot read or write. I think that idea has now been exploded.” \nThis is what the then Dr. Ramgoolam, father of the Nation, said in the debate on 17 \nJune 1958, which to my humble opinion is very relevant with regards to preserving and \nconsolidating our democracy. That is why I congratulate the hon. Prime Minister and the hon. \nAttorney-General for bringing this Bill to the House, and I thank you all for your kind \nattention. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Junior Minister! \n(6.40 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Tourism (Mr J. S. Pierre): Merci, Madame la présidente. Je \nvais aller directement au projet de loi proposé, l’amendement au projet de loi, et ne pas \nrépéter ce que les autres orateurs avant moi ont dit pour gagner du temps. Mais, je ne peux \nm’empêcher en pensant aux notes que j’ai lu du Professeur Jocelyn Chan Low, l’histoire \npolitique de Mauritius, être d’accord avec les deux orateurs avant moi que nous vivons un \nmoment historique. Un moment historique parce que ce qui pourrait sembler être une petite \nformalité, vient compléter effectivement l’exercice de suffrage universel puisque nous allons \nbientôt aux élections municipales, et il y aurait eu des jeunes, beaucoup de personnes qui \nn’auraient pas eu ce droit de vote. \n Donc, je salue ce travail abattu, la proposition des dirigeants de ce gouvernement, le \nPremier ministre, le Deputy Prime Minister, et tous les partenaires de l’Alliance, le \ngouvernement dont je fais partie. Je suis heureux de faire partie de cet exercice démocratique \nque nous vivons en ce moment. Je crois que l’histoire retiendra la date du 19 mars 2025 \ncomme l’accomplissement, l’aboutissement du vote universel. Vous savez, il y a beaucoup de \nchoses même si cela semble être, pour reprendre les mots de l’honorable Duval, être à \ncompte-gouttes. Ce n’est pas à compte-gouttes quand on retire l’homme de l’eau, qui était en \ntrain de se noyer. Il faut également retirer l’eau de l’homme, puisque c’est encore plus \ndouloureux que de le retirer de l’eau. Ce bateau était déjà rempli d’eau, maintenant à chaque \n\n120 \n \nfois que nous avançons, nous voyons qu’il faut retirer de l’eau. Mais, je suis reconnaissant au \nchef du gouvernement qui à part de retirer l’eau du navire, revient aussi approfondir la \ndémocratie promise dans le programme gouvernemental. \nJe vais prendre une citation de Jacques Derrida, être démocrate, même si souvent on \nvoit que le verre est à moitié vide – \n« Être démocrate, ce serait agir en reconnaissant que nous ne vivons jamais dans une \nsociété assez démocratique. »  \nEt c’est ce qui nous fait pousser nos limites pour amener encore un peu plus de démocratie.  \n \nJe prends note que cet amendement amène avant tout un registre complémentaire qui \ndonne l’occasion à tous ceux – je crois que c’était le 16 août et non juin, comme mentionné \npar l’honorable R. Duval –pas inscrits sur un registre au 15 août de 2024, la possibilité de \nvoter pour les municipales qui arrivent bientôt.  \nJe reprends également ce que dit l’amendement, que ce projet ne concerne pas que les \nélections municipales. C’est pour ça que c’est encore plus important cet exercice qui nous \namène, aujourd’hui, à ce projet de loi. Ça concernera toutes les élections. Et je profite pour \nsaluer dans l’histoire tous ceux qui ont combattu pour la démocratie, dont le MMM en 1982 \nqui avait voté la loi pour que les élections législatives ne soient pas renvoyées. Nous arrivons \nmaintenant à deux projets de loi pour amener cet approfondissement de notre démocratie. \nCe registre complémentaire – la démocratie ne marche pas toute seule, ce n’est pas que \nle travail du gouvernement. C’est le travail de la société civile, le travail des médias, le travail \nde tout un chacun de faire en sorte que la population comprenne qu’elle n’a que cinq jours, \nune fois le writ proclamé, pour se faire enregistrer puisque ces batailles, ces luttes et ces \ncombats, des fois a pris du sang dans l’histoire, pour nous donner notre droit de vote, \nmentionné par l’honorable Subron et l’honorable Lobine. Ce droit de vote dont nous parlons, \naujourd’hui, il faut que la population puisse comprendre l’importance de ce combat pour \nqu’elle puisse se faire enregistrer. J’ai entendu l’Attorney General dire que les bureaux seront \nouverts samedi et dimanche pour donner l’occasion à tout le monde de se faire enregistrer.  \nVous savez quand on prend le droit de 400 000 électeurs des villes pendant dix ans, - je \nsuis dans la circonscription numéro 19, Stanley-Rose Hill, et je connais la problématique des \ncitadins tous les jours, quand nous comprenons la gestion d’une municipalité, d’une ville, \n\n121 \n \nconnaissant le souci, les problèmes que connaissent les gens dans les villes – prendre ce droit \néquivaut à ce que le gouvernement précédent ne savait pas ce qui se passait dans les villes ou \nil n’avait aucun souci des gens, des villes ou peut-être des deux. Donc, je trouve inconcevable \nque le régime précédent ait voté des lois pour repousser trois fois les élections municipales. \n400 000 personnes privées de leur droit constitutionnel pendant dix ans, et je suis \nreconnaissant de voir que ce gouvernement a à cœur le droit fondamental, constitutionnel des \ngens. \nVous savez, ce n’est pas qu’un approfondissement de la démocratie, c’est une leçon de \nbon sens. Je suis tout à fait d’accord de la façon que ce projet a été rédigé, et je salue le \ntravail de l’Attorney General également et de tous les techniciens puisqu’il y a aussi la \nmanière de faire. Je prends note que quelqu’un peut contester un nom qui est inscrit sur le \nregistre électoral et que l’officier doit obligatoirement informer la personne qu’une correction \nest faite à son nom. Donc, la manière de faire, ce n’est pas juste la loi mais, c’est la façon de \nfaire aussi qui nous amène à la façon de gouverner.  \nVous savez, le Premier ministre, en ouvrant les débats, a parlé de suppression de la liste \nélectorale où les gouvernements qui ont repoussé les élections. Pourquoi est-ce que vous \nenlèverez les noms d’une liste électorale ? J’ai été témoin dans trois circonscriptions où j’ai \ntravaillé, Savanne-Rivière Noire, Belle Rose-Quatre Bornes, et maintenant, Stanley- Rose \nHill, à chaque fois le traumatisme connu par les agents, même par les électeurs dont les noms \nn’étaient pas inscrits, ils n’avaient pas aucun recours. Aujourd’hui, grâce à l’amendement à \ncette loi, les électeurs ont la possibilité de se faire inscrire. Or, nous savons que les noms \nétaient mal inscrits, des fois volontairement, donc, ce qui leur donnait aucun moyen et aucun \nrecours pour amener leur devoir électoral.  \nAujourd’hui, nous avons devant nous un exercice qui redonne à la République de \nMaurice ses lettres de noblesse. Vous avez un gouvernement qui n’est pas dans les calculs \npolitiques, qui amène la démocratie avec lourd de sens. Une démocratie qui ne calcule pas \nqui c’est qui va voter, où est-ce qu’il va voter, combien d’électeurs doivent être enlevés de la \nliste, quel découpage doit être fait. Vous avez un gouvernement, aujourd’hui, qui a vraiment à \ncœur quand vous voyez tous les amendements – le premier, aujourd’hui - il y en aura \nd’autres, promis par l’Attorney General et le Premier ministre. Nous savons qu’aujourd’hui \nnous avons un gouvernement qui n’amène pas le traumatisme à la population.  \n\n122 \n \nJe vais terminer pour rappeler à tout le monde, aux dernières élections, ce qui s’est \npassé quand un trauma a saisi la population, se rappelant de ce qui s’était passé en 2019. 2019 \n– quand les bulletins disparaissaient, quand les boites disparaissaient, quand les camions \nétaient truqués, tout était truqué, et nous avons tous vécu, tous les candidats, ici, dans \nl’hémicycle, le trauma causé, que ce soit à la veille des élections, que ce soit le jour des \nélections ou que ce soit le jour du dépouillement. Nous ne voulons pas revivre ce trauma ; la \npopulation ne veut pas revivre ce trauma. J’ai été témoin où une foule entassée près des \nécoles qui empêchait les camions de sortir, fouillait les policiers et leurs sacs. Maurice ne \nveut pas revivre cela. Et je suis reconnaissant à ce gouvernement, reconnaissant à cette équipe \nde démocrates qui amène un vrai sens démocratique à notre République. \nMerci, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Je vous remercie. Merci. Hon. Woochit, please! \n(6.50 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Local Government (Mr R. Woochit): Thank you, Madam Speaker, \nfor the opportunity to address on the Representation of the People (Amendment) Bill (No. IV \nof 2025).  \nA significant legislation reform aims at strengthening our democracy by making the \nelectoral process more inclusive and accessible to our electoral system. This Bill introduces a \nsupplementary register of electors, allowing individuals who missed the initial registration \ndeadline to still exercise their right to vote. By removing barriers that hinder voter \nparticipation, it upholds the principles of fairness, democracy and inclusion. Recognising the \nchallenges many citizens faced in meeting the official deadline, this amendment establishes a \nmechanism for supplementary registration after the issuance of election writ, ensuring that no \neligible voter is excluded and reinforcing our commitment to an open and participatory \ndemocracy. \nNow, why the need of electoral modernization? Madam Speaker, a modernized and \ninclusive electoral system is the backbone of any strong democracy. A robust electoral \nprocess ensures that every citizen’s voice is heard and that our Government truly reflects the \nwill of our people. However, outdated procedures, bureaucratic inefficiencies and \nunnecessary delays erode public trust in governments.  \n\n123 \n \nAs it stands, the Representation of the People Act requires a register of electors be \ncompiled annually, becoming valid on 16 August and the remaining in force until the next \nupdate in the following year. This rigid time frame creates a major flaw. Citizens who attain \nthe age of 18 after this date or who failed to register within the initial period are barred from \nvoting in elections held within that year. This exclusionary system is particularly problematic \nfor the Municipal City Council and Municipal Town Council elections scheduled for May \n2025. \nMadam Speaker, under the present framework, voter eligibility is based solely on the \nNational Assembly Election 2024 Register valid from 16 August 2024 to 15 August 2025. \nThis means that any newly eligible voter who turns 18 after 15 August 2024 will not be able \nto vote. Any unregistered, but eligible voter will also be barred from participating. This \nunfairly deprived thousands of citizens violating the principles of equal representation in \nuniversal suffrage.  \nThis problem is further compounded by the repeated postponement of Municipal \nElections, last held in June 2015 and originally due in June 2021. These elections were \npostponed three times – \n(1) \nin June 2021 under the pretext of COVID-19;  \n(2) \nin June 2022 without valid justification, and finally  \n(3) \nin June 2023 through amendment of the Local Government Act enacted \nwithout transparency or proper consultation. \nMadam Speaker, this unprecedented move bypassed the democratic process, depriving \ncitizens of their fundamental rights to elect their local representatives. Recognising this \nfailure, our Prime Minister, Dr. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, has taken decisive steps to restore \nfaith in democracy by ensuring that the Municipal Council Elections proceed in May 2025 \nwithout further delay.  \nOn a parallel line, an Inter-Ministerial Committee and a Technical Committee has been \nestablished to oversee the necessary reforms. Additionally, citizens have been invited to \nsubmit their views on electoral improvements by 31 March 2025, reaffirming our \ncommitment to participatory governance and democratic engagement.  \n\n124 \n \nMadam Speaker, the Representation of the People (Amendment) Bill directly addresses \nthese systemic flaws by introducing a supplementary register of electors for the Municipal \nand Town Council Elections of 2025 and the key provisions include – \n1. \nCreation of a supplementary register of electors. This register will be compiled \nimmediately after election writs are issued. It allows individuals who missed the \ninitial registration deadline a second chance to register. Ensure that no voter is \ndenied their constitutional rights due to the rigid administrative deadlines. \n2. \nStrict eligibility criteria. Only unregistered eligible voters may apply. Applicants \nmust meet all legal voting requirements, including citizenship, residency and age. \nVoters must be 18 years old by Nomination Day and submit valid proof of \nresidence. \n3. \nPublic scrutiny and verifications. The supplementary register will be published \nand available for inspections at the Office of Electoral Commissioner at least one \nday before Nomination Day. Citizens will have the right to verify their details and \nraise objections if necessary. \n4. \n Prevention of electoral fraud. Duplicate of registration will not be permitted. The \nElectoral Commissioner will oversee a rigorous verification process to maintain \nelectoral integrity. \n5. \nOversight by electoral authorities. The Electoral Commissioner will have the \nauthority to verify and process claims fairly. Fraudulent registration will be \npunishable by a fine up to Rs10,000 or imprisonment up to one year. \nMadam Speaker, this proposal has been reviewed and endorsed by the Electoral \nCommissioner who has welcomed the measure as a progressive step towards greater voter \nparticipation and integration. The Electoral Supervisory Commission which has raised no \nobjection and has encouraged further discussion, enabling Mauritian expatriate to vote by \nproxy. \nFurthermore, consultations are underway with the Office of the Electoral Commissioner \nfor same day vote counting in the coming election. An initiative aimed at enhancing \ntransparency, efficiency and public confidence. \n\n125 \n \nMadam Speaker, this Bill is not just about voter registration. It is about strengthening \nour democracy. It will increase voter turnout, ensuring a more representative government, \nrestore faith in democratic institutions after years of electoral uncertainty, empower young \nvoters, ensuring first time voters are not excluded due to bureaucratic delays, enhance public \ntrust, making election more transparent, fair and inclusive.  \nWhile concerns may arise regarding potential administrative challenges, the \nGovernment has implemented a strong safeguard to mitigate risks. These include a strict \nverification process to prevent fraudulent registration, transparency mechanisms with \nindependent observers overseeing the process and public awareness campaigns to educate \ncitizens on registration process. \nMadam Speaker, before I conclude, I wish to inform the House democracy is more than \njust election. It is about ensuring that every eligible citizen has a fair and equal opportunity to \nshape the future of our nation. The Representation of the People (Amendment) Bill is a bold \nand necessary step towards securing this fundamental right. It reaffirms that no voice should \nbe silenced, no rights denied and no citizens excluded from the democratic process.  \nI extend my sincere appreciation to the Prime Minister, Dr. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, \nfor his visionary leadership in advancing this initiative, not for momentary recognition, but to \nstrengthen our democracy by fostering a fair, inclusive and transparent electoral system that \nupholds the fundamental principle of representation and integrity.  \nLet us work together to strengthen our electoral system, ensuring it reflects the true will \nof the people and serves as a lasting legacy of justice and participation.  \nMadam Speaker, I thank you for your attention. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister of Labour! \n(7.00 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations (Mr R. Uteem): Madam Speaker, \nthe Bill concerns compilation of a supplementary register of electors for the forthcoming City \nand Town Council Elections. So, there was an urgency.  \nWhen I listen to the hon. Fourth Member for Constituency No. 4, who is not here, who \ntells us why are we coming with piecemeal amendments. The reason is urgency. We have an \nelection for City Councils and Town Councils. Now, we are amending the law to allow those \n\n126 \n \nwho had been disenfranchised and the youngsters who have not been able to register \nthemselves to register so that they can participate in this election.  \nOf course, we will come later on, after consultation, with amendments because it is in \nour programme. We are going to have electoral amendments. We are going to review the \nelectoral system and we will do it after consultation. But right now, there was an urgency.  \nIt is important, Madam Speaker, to note that whereas Section 41(3) of the Constitution \nrequires the Electoral Supervisory Commission and the Electoral Commissioner to be \nconsulted before we bring any Bill before this House which relates to registration of electors. \nIn our case, even before the Bill was circulated, after the Electoral Commissioner heard the \nPrime Minister announce that we are going to dissolve the Town and Municipal Councils \nafter celebration of Independence Day to come with the elections; he wrote to Government. \nHe told to Government ‘Now that you are going to bring elections, now is the time to amend \nthe law to permit registration of those who had been disenfranchised and those who turn 18 \nafter the 15 August.’   \nWhy did the Electoral Commissioner do that? Because we have had a number of \nmeetings since the last elections of 2019.  \nThe hon. Fourth Member for Constituency No. 4 is correct. There was a letter dated 24 \nApril 2023, signed by the hon. Prime Minister, who was then only Dr. Ramgoolam, Paul \nBérenger and Xavier Duval. I was privileged to form part of the team that drafted those \nproposals and those proposals relate to improving the registration process of electors, the \nvoting and counting process. So, not just the registration. There were 26 proposals. Today we \nare applying only one of those 26 proposals. So, we still have time and we will come and we \nwill make the appropriate amendments.  \nThe Electoral Commissioner and his Office received us several times and explained to \nus. We worked together; we tried to find solutions but the major stumbling block was change \nin legislative provisions. We could not have extended the registration, we could not come \nwith a supplementary register of electors without legislative changes, and in front of us we \nhad the MSM and they were totally reluctant to bring any amendment to the law. This is the \ntruth and today, hon. Duval is sitting next to the MSM, the same MSM who refused to bring \nany legislative change to permit disenfranchised voters to vote at the elections. \n\n127 \n \nMadam Speaker, there has always been complaints by people who could not vote. They \nturned up to the polling station and their name was not on the list. But what happened in 2019 \nwas unprecedented. Unprecedented! We had officially – I am talking about the official figures \npublished by the Electoral Commissioner – 6,813 people turned out to vote. People who are \nusually entitled to vote, who usually vote, whether it is for general elections or municipal \nelections, they are used to vote. They went there; their names were simply erased. They did \nnot have their name there and that had an outcry because 6,813 people, if they were allowed \nto vote, they could have made a difference.  \nI will give you some figures, official figures, Madam Speaker. Election of 2019 – \n(i) \nConstituency No.1, the difference between the fourth Member and the third \nMember was 47 votes and 550 people complained they turned out and they were \nnot allowed to vote; \n(ii) \nConstituency No. 15, the difference between the fourth and the third was 49 \nvotes, and 486 people turned up and were not allowed to vote; \n(iii) Constituency No. 16, the hon. Ms Anquetil is there. There were only 25 votes \nbetween hon. Ms Anquetil and the third elected Member and 500 people turned \nout to vote and were not allowed to vote; \n(iv) Constituency No. 19, 443 people were not allowed to vote and the difference is \nonly 80. \nSo, you can see, Madam Speaker, if people who usually vote were allowed to vote, we \nmay have had a different result in 2019. This is why it was very important through the leaders \nof the parties in the Opposition to come together and meet the Electoral Commissioner, and \ncome with proposals because we could not continue with this disenfranchisement. Today, \nwhat we are doing is truly historical because today, we are giving a chance to everyone \nwhose name is not on the list which has already been published, who did not make any \ncomplaint in the month of May – which they could have done. Today, we are giving all these \npeople, not just those who have turned 18, but even those whose names are not on the register \nto go, after writs have been issued, to register themselves for five days. \nWhy only five days? They hon. Attorney-General has explained very clearly. The \nreason is because you have to work backwards. There is only 15 days between the day of \nwrits and the day of nomination. The minimum is 15 days. So, you have to make concessions \nfor people who are going to object, the hearing of the objection, the determination of the \nobjection, and the publication of the updated register. So, that why we could only give five \n\n128 \n \ndays. But of course, as he has carefully explained, the Electoral Commissioner has taken all \nthe necessary precautions to make sure that the electoral registration centres be open even \nduring weekend for people to be able to go and register themselves if their name is not on the \nlist. \nMadam Speaker, the hon. Prime Minister also talked about the counting on same day. \nAgain, we had extensive meetings, hon. Bérenger, hon. Dr. Ramgoolam, myself and other \nMembers of the MMM and even Nouveaux Démocrates, hon. Lobine, was with us. Before \nthe general elections, we wanted same day counting and we came with proposals. We did not \nwant the ballot boxes to move from the polling station. Unfortunately, for practical reasons \nand also because in order to give effect to same day counting for general elections we needed \nto amend the law through regulation, but it is the President who makes the regulation, it is the \nPresident acting of advice of Cabinet to do so. We did not control Government. Now that we \nare in Government, now we are able to pass the necessary regulation to ensure that same day \ncounting is a reality, at least for now for the municipal and town elections. \nBut of course, this is still work in progress, Madam Speaker, as I said we had 26 \nproposals. We still have time to hold consultations and we will come with amendments. For \nexample, we will have – that was one of the suggestions that we made and that was accepted \nby the Electoral Commissioner – to have a system of continuous registration. At the moment, \nthere are canvassers who come for a few months a year and then the list is computed in May; \nyou object or you do not object, and then it is finalised in August. So, we have to have a \nsystem where you can have registration all year round. You should not have a cutoff date.  \nAlso, I agree with hon. Dr. Aumeer, it will have to be digitalised. We need to have \nonline registration. Of course, we have to provide all the necessary proof of address, the \nidentity, everything, but then it will be online because it is going to save time and will also \navoid what the hon. Prime Minister mentioned about canvassers who come, they say they did \nnot see you, they came back and say again they did not you but we do not if they were lying \nor not. But if you have a system of online registration, everybody will be able to have their \nname and will able to exercise their fundamental right to choose a representative of their \nchoice. \nMadam Speaker, as I said, disenfranchisement is not new. It was already referred by \nAlbie Sachs in his report more than 20 years ago, but history will have it that it is this \n\n129 \n \nGovernment led by the hon. Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister, who came with \nthe appropriate legislative changes to allow every citizen of this country to vote. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you! Yes, hon. Minister of Agriculture! \n(7.11 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries (Dr. A. Boolell): Madam Speaker, the Alliance du Changement under the luminary leadership of Dr. \nNavinchandra Ramgoolam is the voice of the people. With Paul Raymond Bérenger, \ndignified leader of the MMM, and our political landscape, together with our friends from \nRezistans et Alternativ and Nouveaux Démocrates, this alliance is the powerhouse of \ndemocracy. \nThe Bill moves the democratic process and the key word is ‘inclusivity’. No voter is \nleft behind. It is an amazing feat of democracy. The Attorney-General is right to state \nemphatically the amendment to the Representation of People Act is a landmark legislation. It \nis a reform which is prominent in the Government Programme of 2025-2029. The right to \nvote being extended to 400,000 eligible voters and the circle of opportunities has been \nwidened to all qualified unregistered voters.  \nYesterday, the President of the Republic, acting on the advice of the hon. Prime \nMinister under Section 10(3)(a) of the Local Government Act, issued proclamation for \ndissolution of Municipal Councils. Tomorrow, he will give his assent and the Bill will be \ngazetted. Democracy has no price and it is of an essence. The Opposition, Madam Speaker, \nhas been caught with pants down and has blurted almost anything. I do not know of any voter \nwho will be against the amendments to Representation of the People Act. The hon. Attorney \ngeneral has thoroughly explained the merits of the amendment. The relevance of the \nsupplementary register will be extended to other elections by way of regulations.  \nMadam Speaker, the MSM councillors are all out; flat out, total exit! They have left a \nmess. The forthcoming Municipal elections will be an opportunity knock to redress the \nsituation with dignified, effective, meaningful and transparent leadership at Local \nGovernment. Be it Local or Central Government, Madam Speaker, the management were the \npolitics of fantasy, corruption, lies and fake news. It is good to recall we made provision for \nat least one person of opposite sex to stand as a candidate in every ward. \n\n130 \n \nOf course, the hon. Prime Minister and the hon. Deputy Prime Minister gave firm \ncommitment on International Women’s Day celebration for fair representation at the next \ngeneral elections. The Bill may be halfway home in anticipation of a comprehensive \nlegislation on electoral reform. May I remind the House, the MSM regime deliberately denied \nthe voters of the Municipal City Council and Municipal Town Council their legitimate rights. \nUnder false pretences, elections were postponed till the decadent, filthy corrupt regime was \nwiped out. It is good to recall that since 2015 to 2023, the then Vice Prime Minister and \nMinister of Local Government brought the Local Government Act to the House to be \namended four times. It was a cowardice act, the fear of being trounced at the polls and it had \nnothing to do with pandemic COVID-19. \nBesides, borders were reopened to commercial flights in July 2021. Village Councils \nElections were held on 22 November 2020, Rodrigues held its Rodrigues Regional Assembly \nelections on 27 February 2022 as scheduled despite fair or foul weather. In 2023, the regime \ncame with a Certificate of Emergency to amend the Local Government Act so as to empower \nthe President acting in accordance with the advice of the Prime Minister to further extend the \nlives of the entire Municipal City Council and Municipal Town Council or the entire Village \nCouncil For another two years. \n There is a constitutional underpinning to the Local Government Act since there is \nprovision for fair representation of women in every ward. This Bill is a great strive. The hon. \nPrime Minister is bringing amendments the Representation of People Act to enfranchise all \neligible and qualified voters for the forthcoming Municipal Elections. Counting will be held \non the same day, in the same Voting Centre and as the hon. Prime Minister has stated, it can \nbe done by way of regulation. Ballot boxes will not be transported. Doubt of tampering will \nbe eliminated. Clarity, certainty, rights and obligations are being fulfilled. \nThe Electoral Commissioner has given firm assurances; it is a reaffirmation of our \ncommitment to democracy, inclusivity and fairness. Under the current Electoral Framework, \nmany eligible citizens who turn 18 after 15 August, have been unjustly deprived of the right \nto administrative cut-off date. Many eligible voters are unaware of registration procedures \nand deadlines. The amendments assume people will take the initiative. Government will have \nto conduct a nationwide Voter Education Campaign that is SMS, email, notification to alert \neligible voters about registration deadlines. \n\n131 \n \nCollaboration with schools and universities to register students turning 18 since a very \nlong time, for the first time I must say, is a real empowerment of young voters. We have to \nmake sure that mobile registration units be set up to reach a vast majority. Madam Speaker, \nthere will be two registers as has been stated, I will not go over it but let me make it quite \nclear that there is a sizeable percentage of the electorate who feel more convenient and \ncomfortable to make online application and we said that provisions will be made to ensure \nthat there will be online application to be registered as a voter. \nOur economy is service-oriented to a large extent and the supplementary register should \nbe the gateway to comprehensive register and it will come as and when required. Madam \nSpeaker, who has not complained to the Electoral Commission that the canvasser has failed to \nact diligently because of omission over registration and the classical reply is the eligible voter \nis not at home. People travel and there should be no reason for omission. The loopholes are \nbeing plugged to avoid flimsy arguments for non-registration. \nMadam Speaker, let me remind the House – there are many who do not have the means \nand acumen to make the online application as and when it will be done but it was Mr \nRajsoomer Lallah, then Acting Deputy to the Electoral Commission who advised the premier, \nSir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam, that door-to-door canvassing for registration should stay \nforever. It was said two years prior to 1967 General Elections. A note of caution, Madam \nSpeaker, and warning to those who want to manipulate the system to register illegal voters – \npenalty is clearly spelt out in section 39D (4)(a), the provisions are clear and the penalty is \nheavy. \nAs responsible voters and citizens, those who deliberately want to foil the process \nshould and would be denied. Madam Speaker, we are yet to be told by the Electoral \nCommission if voting will start at 7 a.m. and will be over at 5 or 6 p.m. It is good to recall \nthat the last hour of canvassing can make the difference and it is still in the psyche of many \nvoters that the door of voting centres closes at 6 p.m.  \nLet me conclude Madam Speaker by saying, we have travelled a long way and we \ntravel a long way to consolidate democracy, we travel a long way to enfranchise those who \nare eligible to vote but are not on the register. This is a democracy and the process of \ndemocracy’s big move because it is a Government well entrenched in a democratic process. \nThank you very much. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Deputy Prime Minister! \n\n132 \n \n(7.21 p.m.) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, aujourd’hui nous allons voter ce texte \nde loi très important. Nous allons voter ce texte de loi en First, Second et Third Reading – en \npremière, seconde et troisièmes lecture, ce qui n’est pas la pratique démocratique normale \nmais ceci dit, si nous ne le faisons pas, un certain nombre de jeunes de 18 ans n’auront pas le \ndroit de voter, ne pourront pas voter aux élections municipales du 4 mai prochain et ne \npourraient non plus être candidats à ces élections municipales et cela parce que la façon dont \nl’exercice d’enregistrement des électrices et des électeurs se déroulent sous la loi actuelle. \nEn effet comme a été dit, comme a été expliqué avant moi, chaque année, une nouvelle \nliste d’électeurs et des électrices entre en vigueur le 16 août après que tous ceux qui ont droit \nse sont enregistrés et tous ceux qui ont 18 ans à cette date qui ont voulu être enregistrés ont \nun droit de vote. Mais ceux qui ont eu 18 ans entre cette date et la date d’entrée de la nouvelle \nliste d’électeurs et d’électrices l’année suivante ne peuvent ni voter ni se porter candidat. \nC’est ça la vérité. C’est pourquoi nous agissons en urgence aujourd’hui et que nous allons \nvoter, avec la conscience claire, ce texte de loi en première, deuxième et troisième lecture. \nC’est d’ailleurs ainsi qu’aux dernières élections générales, 1 205 électeurs et électrices \ndes villes ayant atteint l’âge de 18 ans après le 15 août 2024 n’ont pu voter ou se porter \ncandidat. D’où le supplementary register que cette loi permettra au commissaire électoral de \ndresser avant les prochaines élections municipales du 4 mai 2025. \nMadam Speaker: Oui ! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister : Si cette loi n’est pas votée en première, deuxième et \ntroisième lecture aujourd’hui, je le répète, Madam Speaker, de deux choses, soit quelque 1 \n200 jeunes électeurs et électrices ayant 18 ans n’auront pas le droit de voter ou d’être \ncandidat, soit nous aurions à retarder de quelques jours ou de même quelques semaines les \nélections municipales. Et nous ne le voulons à aucun prix. Nous voulons que les élections \nmunicipales se tiennent à la date annoncée. \nMadam Speaker, c’est avec plaisir que je dis qu’il faut noter que c’est le commissaire \nélectoral qui a été le premier à attirer l’attention sur ce problème que nous réglons \naujourd’hui. La commission électorale de son côté est d’accord avec le projet de loi qui est \ndevant nous. C’est donc un grand pas en avant. C’est un signe de respect aussi, un grand coup \nde chapeau, un signe de respect aux jeunes. \n\n133 \n \nMême s’il n’y avait que deux ou un, le symbole est très fort. Nous faisons cet effort. \nNous passons un petit peu outre à la pratique démocratique normale par respect pour les \njeunes parce que nous ne voulons pas qu’un jeune ayant eu 18 ans ne peut pas voter s’il a le \ndésir ou de se porter comme candidat aux prochaines élections municipales. Madam Speaker, \nc’est quelque chose de formidable que nous réalisons aujourd’hui. C’est notre devoir que \nnous remplissons vis-à-vis des jeunes une fois de plus.  \nUne fois que nous aurions fait cela, Madam Speaker, le same day counting pour les \nélections du 4 mai et pour les prochaines élections générales – nous le souhaitons tous – se \nfera une fois tous les problèmes pratiques réglés. \nDe plus, il est à noter que la commission électorale a demandé au gouvernement \nd’examiner la possibilité – que nous allons faire – d’amender la loi pour que la diaspora \nmauricienne, les Mauritian expatriates puissent voter par proxy. Ce n’est pas chose facile à \nfaire. Peut-être que d’autres moyens de donner le droit de vote à la diaspora existent. Nous \nallons nous pencher là-dessus et porter une attention particulière à ce que la commission \nélectorale nous a demandé d’examiner. Nous profitons aussi pour féliciter encore une fois le \ncommissaire électoral et son équipe pour les idées qu’il nous donne, pour le travail qu’ils font \net pour le service qu’ils rendent au pays, Madam Speaker. \n Nous réalisons tout cela parce que c’est notre devoir. Mais nous le faisons aussi en \nattendant qu’une bonne réforme électorale avec une dose de proportionnelle fasse de notre \nsystème électoral une démocratie exemplaire. \nMadam Speaker, je suis fier ce soir d’être avec tous les députés ici présents pour \nfranchir encore un pas en avant sur le chemin de la démocratie, surtout quand nous le faisons \ntous ensemble au nom de notre jeunesse.  \nMerci, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Prime Minister! \n(7.28 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: Thank you, Madam Speaker. It is clear there is consensus in the \nHouse. There is a positive response in the public, and also, I see in the media.  \nThe hon. Deputy Prime Minister is absolutely right. This was an urgent matter because \notherwise, many young people would not have been able to vote, if we want to maintain the \ndate we decided on.  \n\n134 \n \nBut who could really be opposed to giving the people in towns their right to choose \ntheir Municipal Councillors after 10 years? Who could be opposed? As hon. Ashok Subron \nrightly said, we are widening the franchise – this is the word he used. Who could be opposed \nto that?  \nI must also thank hon. Reza Uteem because he pointed out the narrowness of the votes \nin several constituencies. I must tell you, Madam Speaker, in Constituency No. 10 in 2019, I \nlost by some 632 or 638 votes. But there were more than 1,000 people who actually did not \nmanage to vote in that constituency. That gives you an idea. Some complained; some did not \ncomplain. They protested on the media; they protested on the radio, but they did not go and \ncomplain officially. This is what we have seen.  So, every vote is important. I thank him for \nhaving pointed this out. \nHon. A. Duval was at pains to say he agrees, ‘but’. It is always the same; he agrees, \n‘but.’ On ne gouverne pas avec des ‘mais.’ His confusion about a Commonwealth citizen \nbeing allowed to vote in municipal elections was incredible! I think the Attorney General’s \nresponse was stunning. It was a deadly response! He said: ‘hon. A. Duval is factually, legally \nand plainly wrong. It is not the case.’ \nAs for the question of online registration which was canvassed, allowing expatriates to \nvote, allowing the diaspora to vote, this was canvassed also before the last elections. I am \nglad the Electoral Commissioner has taken it up again. There are difficulties in this. We are \naware that there are difficulties. But we will examine this further with the Electoral \nCommissioner and the ESC because we must be able to overcome all difficulties. They have \novercome them in other countries; we should be able to overcome them. \nThe last point was about preserving anonymity. If we do counting on the same day, if \nwe do not move the ballot boxes, you are likely to know which region has voted for whom. \nBut I was just now saying to the Deputy Prime Minister, those who are sur le terrain, they \nknow!  In 1991, I knew the area who voted for me and who did not actually vote for me. But \nit is important that we preserve anonymity. The vote must remain secret. We will do \neverything for it to remain secret. \nMadam Speaker, with these few words, I commend the Bill to the House. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nQuestion put and agreed to. \n\n135 \n \nBill read a second time and committed. \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(Madam Speaker in the Chair) \nThe Representation of the People (Amendment) Bill (No. IV of 2025) was considered \nand agreed to.  \nOn the Assembly resuming with Madam Speaker in the Chair, Madam Speaker reported \naccordingly.  \nThird Reading  \nOn motion made and seconded, the Representation of the People (Amendment) Bill (No. \nIV of 2025) was read a third time and passed. \nMadam Speaker: I suspend the Sitting for one hour. Is that alright? \nAt 7.35 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 8.45 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Please be seated. Hon. Prime Minister! \nSecond Reading \nTHE FINANCE AND AUDIT (AMENDMENT) BILL  \n(NO. II OF 2025) \nOrder for Second Reading read. \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I move that the Finance and Audit \n(Amendment) Bill (No. II of 2025) be read a second time. \nIn the past 10 years, we have seen an unprecedented abuse and misuse of government \nfinancial resources. As a result of the irresponsible fiscal stewardship, we have today a most \nprecarious financial situation, to say the least, disastrous. The previous government has been \nrunning a high budget deficit, accumulating enormous debts on the shoulders of every citizen \nof this country, including newborn babies. No responsible government, Mr Deputy Speaker, \nSir, can allow such a state of affairs to continue. This is the very reason why we are \nintroducing this Bill in the House, and there is urgency. This is why, again, it comes in first, \nsecond and third reading, because Budget Day is approaching very fast, and there are lots of \nwork which need to be done for us to be able to apply what we want to do. \n\n136 \n \nWith this Bill, Government will put greater emphasis on policy outcomes rather than \nhow much is being spent. Judging Government policies by the amount of money that is being \nspent is erroneous and misleading. We want to see the best outcome for every rupee and cent \nthat we are going to spend. I will give you an example, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. I am sure the \nhon. Minister of Health will not mind my saying so. In the Ministry of Health, we are \nspending around Rs17 billion on health alone, one item. But can we say that we are getting \ntop-notch public health service? Far from it! What is the point of throwing money without \ngetting results? This is what we are trying to correct. This Bill will facilitate and have a more \nresponsible approach to fiscal stewardship by providing for the reintroduction of \nPerformance-Based Budgeting and the appropriation of funds based on programmes. \nThe PBB – I nearly said PRB – will be a simpler version that is focused primarily on \nachieving outcomes and improving service delivery. In other words, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, \nit will be result-oriented. The previous government never understood, I think, the importance \nand the merits of Performance-Based Budgeting. In 2015, they replaced PBB with line-by-\nline item budgeting, which is based on inputs but not on outcomes. They changed the \ndirection, and then they lost focus on the results and outcomes that we are expecting. Our \npublic finances would not have been in such a disastrous situation had they continued with \nPBB. They have spent money on reckless projects like this white elephant project, Côte d’Or; \njust throwing money away. This is why we will also later on bring the Fiscal Responsibility \nAct. There would not have been so many contingency liabilities that we see now piled up. It \nis criminal negligence from what I can see. \nToday, with this Bill, we are restoring the core strength of budgeting. Under the PBB, \nthe budget of ministries and departments will be presented in terms of programmes and sub-\nprogrammes. This will help in improving budget formulation, the whole process, by focusing \non the purposes and objectives for which the funds are required, which will lead to a more \nstrategic and result-oriented approach. In this respect, clause 3 of the Bill defines a \nprogramme as a set of activities or interventions contributing to the achievement of a \ncommon outcome. A sub-programme is also defined as a distinct set of activities or \ninterventions within a programme. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the PBB will promote accountability by linking financial \nresources to specific outcomes, outputs and performance indicators. It will, therefore, make it \neasier to track how funds are being used and whether they are achieving the intended results. \nIt will also allow ministries and departments to review the processes and identify and \n\n137 \n \neliminate wasteful practices, which will result in greater efficiency and effectiveness in the \nuse of our resources. \nAlso, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it will bring more discipline. Throwing money without \naccountability is not going to help. We need to have accountability. This is why clause 3 of \nthe Bill defines an outcome as the impact that the programme intends to achieve, not only in \nthe short-term but also in the medium-term, and it is measured by an outcome indicator. It \nalso defines an output as the services to be provided to achieve an outcome. This is measured \nby Key Performance Indicators. The KPI is linked to the ministries. Therefore, the key \nelement is accountability. If they do not achieve a targeted output, I am afraid the ministry \nwill have to be accountable. Here, clause 4 of the Bill provides for ministries and departments \nto submit a progress report on the performance in respect to the outputs and outcomes related \nto the targets that have been set. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I will now highlight the other main provisions of the Bill. \nSection 105(2) of the Constitution stipulates that heads of expenditure should be included in \nan Appropriation Bill, which is voted in the National Assembly in order to incur the \nexpenditure from the Consolidated Fund. \nCurrently, in the Finance and Audit Act, the head of expenditure is defined as a vote of \nexpenditure. Thus, appropriation has been made by vote of expenditure. With the \nreintroduction of PBB, appropriation will be made by programme instead of by vote on \nexpenditure. Thus, clause 3 of the Bill provides for the definition of “head of expenditure” as \nprogramme instead of vote of expenditure. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, presently, the Finance and Audit Act refers to estimates as \nannual estimates. Annual estimates are both revenue and expenditure, and it provides for the \nestimates to be approved by this august Assembly. It gives the impression that both estimates \nof expenditure and revenue are approved by the National Assembly, whereas, in fact, \naccording to budgeting principles, only the estimates of expenditure need to be appropriated. \nClause 3 of the Bill clarifies this issue by providing for “estimates of expenditure” and \n“estimates of revenue” to be defined separately. Only the estimates of expenditure will then \nhave to be approved by the National Assembly. \n\n138 \n \nAlong the same vein, clause 5 of the Bill is amending section 22 of the Finance and \nAudit Act to provide for the Ministry of Finance to issue financial instructions for the \npreparation of estimates of revenue and estimates of expenditure, both separately.  \nIn addition, clause 6 is amending section 23A of the Finance and Audit Act to provide \nfor the Ministry of Finance to present estimates of revenue and estimates of expenditure, \nagain, separately. It will be done as from fiscal year 2025-2026 onwards. \nFollowing the enactment of this Bill, the Standing Orders and the Rules of the National \nAssembly will have to be amended accordingly. In this regard, I will shortly present a Motion \nin the House to trigger the process for amending the Standing Orders. \nThe House may also note that the Performance-Based Budgeting system will also be \nreintroduced in statutory bodies, local authorities, and the Rodrigues Regional Assembly as \nfrom fiscal year 2026-2027. We are, in fact, providing a transition period of one year for \nthese bodies. In this context, all these will have to be amended again to align the budgeting \nframework with that of Government. By all these, I mean the statutory bodies, the Local \nGovernment Act, the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act and so on. The amendments will be \nmade in the Finance (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill of 2025. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Performance-Based Budgeting should go a long way to \naddressing this recurrent problem. The Ministry of Finance will work together with statutory \nbodies, the local authorities and the Rodrigues Regional Assembly to facilitate this transition \nperiod of one year towards Performance-Based Budgeting. \nTo conclude, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to reiterate that we are resolute in \nour endeavour to put our public finances back on a sound footing. We want to focus, again, as \nI said, on results rather than outcomes. The reintroduction of the PBB is one of our major \npolicy reforms to usher in a new era of transparency and fiscal discipline. It is also a crucial \nstep towards harmonising budgeting with long-term socioeconomic planning. I should also \npoint out that despite the recurrent problems - we have seen it year in, year out; the Director \nof Audit points out all these wastages every year, but there has been no resulting \nimprovement, at least for the last 10 years, in wastage of public funds. This should address \nthe problem of wastage of public funds significantly. \n\n139 \n \nI, therefore, expect the full collaboration and cooperation of my colleague ministers but \nalso of all public officers to ensure the successful implementation of this major reform, which \nis going to be good for the country and for the finances of this country. \nWith these words, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I commend the Bill to the House. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Leader of the Opposition! As from now, everybody will \nhave 10 minutes.  \n(8.57 p.m.) \nThe Leader of the Opposition (Mr G. Lesjongard): Merci, M. le président, de me \ndonner l’occasion d’intervenir lors des débats sur le Finance and Audit (Amendment) Bill. \nM. le président, j’interviens sur ce projet de loi car j’estime avoir une certaine \nexpérience en matière de gestion d’un ministère, tout comme certains membres de l’autre \ncôté de la Chambre qui occupent des fonctions ministérielles. Mais, M. le président, il est de \nmon devoir de poser un certain nombre de questions avant d’aller de l’avant avec cet \namendement qui propose, comme l’a dit le Premier ministre, la réintroduction d’un budget \nprogramme axé sur les performances.  \nJe parle de réintroduction, M. le président, car, dans un passé pas trop lointain, nous \navions mis en pratique ce système et ce système avait été mis au placard en 2015 ; système \nqui fut introduit en 2008, sous le ministre des Finances d’alors qui est, aujourd’hui, le \ngouverneur de la Banque de Maurice, c’est-à-dire M. Rama Sithanen.  \nM. le président, pendant les interventions lors des débats sur le discours programme, \nj’ai cru comprendre que c’est la même politique économique qu’il y a eu entre 2005 et 2010 \nqui sera peut-être mise en place par l’actuel gouvernement. Est-ce un bon choix ? Le temps, \nM. le président, nous le dira. Et j’espère que cette politique d’imposer au peuple de serrer sa \nceinture, particulièrement, aux vulnérables et à la classe moyenne, ne sera pas cette fois-ci à \nl’ordre du jour de ce gouvernement.  \nM. le président, le budget programme axé sur les performances a pour but d’améliorer \nl’efficience et l’efficacité des dépenses publiques en liant le financement des institutions \n\n140 \n \npubliques aux résultats qu’elles doivent obtenir en utilisant systématiquement des \ninformations sur des performances. There will be even more scrutiny of public expenses and I \nbelieve, even the way the budget is prepared will change, as stated by the hon. Prime \nMinister.  \nMais, M. le président, le BPP exige la mise en place des mécanismes de planifications \nefficaces et fiables, des systèmes performants de collecte, de stockage, d’analyses des \ninformations sur les performances non-financières. In other words, it requires a paradigm \nshift at the level of the country and a change in the way government functions and the way \ngovernment communicates.  \nM. le président, la première question qu’on est en droit de se poser, c’est : est-ce que \nces conditions sont, aujourd’hui, réunies afin de permettre ce gouvernement d’aller dans cette \ndirection ? Pourquoi je dis cela, M. le président ? I wish to refer to a report published by the \nCollaborative Africa Budget Reform Initiative (CABRI), rapport qui a été publié en 2013 et \nqui fait référence à 15 pays africains qui ont implémenté le Performance-Based Budgeting \nsystem. Et sur ces 15 pays, que deux pays qui sortent du lot, c’est l’Afrique du Sud et l’île \nMaurice. And when it refers to Mauritius, Mauritius has been only successful, meaning \ntotally satisfied 9 of the 16 pre-conditions for the implementation of the Performance-Based \nBudgeting system, and that was back in 2013.  \nThat’s why I asked the question, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, whether the conditions now \nare there for the implementation of the Performance-Based Budgeting System. \nAutre chose que je voulais savoir, est-ce qu’il y a eu des consultations avec des \nresponsables administratifs de la fonction publique sur l’implémentation d’un tel système ? \nDéjà, la lourdeur administrative du secteur public est souvent décriée par la société, même \npar les médias. Ne sommes-nous pas en train de ralentir encore plus l’administration de nos \nministères ou des corps parapublics, M. le président ?  \nAutant que je m’en souviens, M. le président, les fonctionnaires avaient eu toutes les \npeines du monde à cette époque pour pouvoir s’adapter aux Performance-Based Budgeting \nSystem à tous les niveaux. Avant d’aller de l’avant, j’ai vu cela dans un certain rapport, est-ce \nqu’il ne faudrait pas aller plutôt à une refonte en profondeur de l’administration publique et \nde la fonction publique, visant à augmenter, M. le président, la motivation des fonctionnaires \net à élaborer des mesures incitatives à leur égard ?  \n\n141 \n \nJ’ai comme l’impression qu’on veut introduire ce système sans préparation. J’avais \nposé cette question il y a quelque temps de cela : est-ce qu’il ne faudrait pas une période de \ntransition ? Mais là, je comprends que cette période de transition va toucher seulement les \nstatutory bodies et le Rodrigues Regional Assembly. En ce faisant, est-ce qu’on ne court pas \nle risque de démotiver l’ensemble de la fonction publique ? Pourquoi je dis cela, M. le \nprésident ? C’est parce que nous avons une nouvelle génération d’officiers de hauts rangs \ndans la fonction publique. C’est pourquoi, moi, je pense qu’il est impératif que cette nouvelle \ngénération à la tête de la fonction publique soit exposée à ce nouveau mode de pensée et à ces \nnouvelles pratiques de gestion. \nM. le président, d’autres aspects à prendre en considération, ce sont les modifications et \nles réallocations des projets. Par exemple, il peut arriver qu’un projet soit sujet à des \nmodifications en cours de son implémentation. On a un budget accordé pour un projet et ce \nbudget doit être réalloué à un autre projet qui est entre-temps devenu prioritaire. Par exemple, \nnous avons vécu cela sous la pandémie de la Covid où il y a eu une urgence sanitaire et il \nfallait agir vite en termes de ressources financières et en termes de logistique. Puis, il y a \naussi un autre aspect important, c’est-à-dire la variation – aujourd’hui, c’est d’actualité –des \ncoûts liés au changement climatique.  \nLa budgétisation verte est pertinente, M. le président, à toutes les étapes, que ce soit au \nniveau de la planification, de la formulation, de l’approbation, de la mise en œuvre et du \ncontrôle. J’ai cru comprendre qu’il y aura des KPIs. Est-ce qu’on va rendre responsables les \nfonctionnaires pour le retard ou pour une augmentation des dépenses dans un cas où un projet \nest retardé, par exemple, à cause des dégâts liés à des inondations ou à une sécheresse, M. le \nprésident ? On est en droit de se poser certaines questions, M. le président. Est-ce que nos \nfonctionnaires dans les différents départements maîtrisent cet aspect ? M. le président, ce qui \nn’est actuellement qu’une simple lettre à la poste, si je peux me permettre de le dire de cette \nfaçon, risque de prendre plusieurs mois à être exécuté sous cet amendement que nous \nsommes en train de voter. \nPremièrement, est-ce que le Performance-Based Budgeting peut être adapté à tous nos \ndépartements ? Je pense qu’à certains ministères, oui. Mais peut-être à d’autres, non. Par \nexemple, au ministère de la Santé. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, what realistic targets can we set to \nachieve and how do we manage the Ministry which requires the most amount of funds ahead \nof the Ministry of Social Security?  \n\n142 \n \nUn autre exemple : le ministère des Infrastructures publiques où on a beaucoup de \nprojets, mais avec des variables difficiles à maîtriser. Par exemple, les contestations \nconcernant l’expropriation des terres qui peuvent retarder considérablement l’implémentation \nd’un projet pour plusieurs mois. Des fois, pour plusieurs années, M. le président. \nM. le président, certain parmi les membres de cette auguste Assemblée qui sont de \nl’autre côté de la Chambre et qui avaient les responsabilités ministérielles en 2008-2010, se \nrappellent comment c’était un casse-tête pour les fonctionnaires pour uniquement, je vous \ndonne un exemple, mettre sur papier les chiffres pour les loyers et les salaires où il existe \nplusieurs départements sous un même ministère. Certains ministres ne s’y retrouvaient même \npas, surtout, M. le président, pendant l’analyse des différentes dotations… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Your ten minutes is over! I am allowing you one additional \nminute. Your ten minutes is over! \nMr Lesjongard:  Do I also understand that I had only ten minutes? \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, this is what I have said. \nMr Lesjongard: That was not told to me! \nMs Anquetil: No, sorry! The Whip of the Opposition is out! \nThe Deputy Speaker: It has been agreed that everyone will have ten minutes. Anyway, \nI will give you one additional minute to conclude. \n Mr Lesjongard: Le message ne m’est pas parvenu, M. le président. Je suis navré. Je \nvais essayer de conclure. \nThe Deputy Speaker: It was an agreement between the two Whips! \nMr Lesjongard: Je vais essayer de conclure. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, thank you. Let us listen to his conclusion! \nMr Lesjongard: M. le président, on va mieux comprendre, par exemple, au bout d’un \nan, quand les dossiers sur les projets seront encore à faire des va-et-vient entre les différents \nministères et le ministère des Finances. Je comprends l’intention du Premier ministre. Son \nintention est correcte parce qu’il faut réduire les gaspillages, M. le président.  \nMais selon moi, on va ajouter encore plus de procédures. Je pense, M. le président, que \nla priorité pour moi, c’est de poursuivre l’informatisation de la fonction publique. Nous avons \n\n143 \n \ndémarré ce projet et j’espère que ce sera complété sous son mandat. Comme ça, nous \npourrons avoir un vrai contrôle sur la gestion des fonds publics, M. le président.  \nJ’en ai terminé. Merci. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. The hon. Minister of Labour and Industrial \nRelations! \n(9.12 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations (Mr R. Uteem): Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir, I have listened carefully to the hon. Leader of the Opposition. I have to admit \nthat I still do not know after the 10-12 minutes he has spoken, whether he will support this \nBill or not. Because he stated by criticising it, and then, he concluded by congratulating the \nPrime Minister for trying to reduce… \nAn hon. Member: Il vaut mieux tard que jamais! \nMr Uteem: So, I am confused! I am confused the more so, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, \nbecause it’s the third attempt to reform budgetary system in Mauritius. The first one started \nwhen he was Minister in 2003, under the Medium-Term Expenditure Programme with a pilot \nproject on six Ministries. Then in 2006, it was applied to more Ministries and in 2008, the \nlaw was amended and we had the Programme-Based Budgeting where the budget move from \nline-by-line budget to a programme and sub-programme-based budgeting. When that Bill was \nvoted in 2008, he was also here, and everybody voted in favour of that Bill. So, everybody \nback in 2008 was in favour of moving from line budgeting to programme and sub-\nprogramme-based budgeting. \nThen in 2015, after the election, with the MSM-led Government, they changed it again \nto line budgeting and today, what we are doing is bringing back Performance-Based \nBudgeting in a slightly more simplified version than it was in 2008. Now, what is \nPerformance-Based Budgeting? It is simply a budgeting approach where funding decisions \nare based on specific results, on specific outcomes and then you have the output that you \nneed to achieve the outcome, and for the outcome you have key indicators, Key Performance \nIndicators (KPI) to find out whether you are on track and whether you are meeting your \nobjective.  \n\n144 \n \nSo, this is something that, for example, a project which will last for three years, every \nyear, you will have the Minister come to this House and explain during budgetary time what \nwas supposed to be the outcome, what has happened last year whether they are on track or \nthey are not on track, whether the amount which has been voted for that programme is being \nwell-spent, whether they need more money or whether they have decided to change it \nbecause as the hon. Leader of the Opposition has mentioned, there may be changes in \ncircumstances, there may be new priorities. So, it is not a case where if you started on a \nprogramme, you definitely need to continue with it on three years. It is a dynamic process. \nBut what this Performance-Based Budgeting does? It requires planning. It forces line \nministries to sit down with the Ministry of Finance and plan, think, not spend, think then \ndecide, then plan, identify priorities. Ministries may have a lot of spending, prioritise it – for \nthis year, we will prioritise this sector, this programme, this outcome. Then effective resource \nallocation makes sure that the money that is voted goes for that programme and that includes \nmonitoring.  \n(Interruptions) \nI think he is still going to find out whether he is in favour or not.  \nWith this Performance-Based Budgeting, Ministries are forced to monitor spending. \nThey are forced to evaluate service delivery and ensure that we get value for money. So, this \nsection will bring transparency and accountability. \nAn hon. Member: That’s why he walked out! \nMr Uteem: So, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I still don’t know and I was hoping that he \nwill indicate whether he is in favour or not because I was here in 2015. I was in this House in \n2015 when the newly elected MSM government decided to reverse all the good work that had \nbeen done. The hon. Leader of the Opposition mentioned the Collaborative Africa Budget \nReform Initiative (CABRI) and how we got 9 out of 16. There was teething problems; we are \nnot saying that it was perfect. But at least we were on the right track. I was reading an article \nwhich said: “Programme-Based Budgeting in Mauritius – A Successful Big Bang Approach”. \nSo, even in the international community, Mauritius was cited as example as the country \nwhich was implementing this. \nSo, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, why did the Government in 2015 get rid of this \nProgramme-Based Budgeting? I went back to Hansard and I read it because I just wanted to \n\n145 \n \nrefresh my memory. There were three reasons. The first reason, and I read it, that was \nLutchmeenaraidoo, then Minister of Finance – the reason why he changed the law… \nAn hon. Member: Law? \nMr Uteem: Yes, because he amended the law.  \n“Programme-Based Budgeting (PBB) is so complex. Madam Speaker, it is so complex \nthat even professionals in this House cannot make any sense out of it. I [hon. \nLutchmeenaraidoo] was having problem understanding it because it is very, very \ncomplicated.” \nBecause the Minister did not understand, so he changed it. So, all that we have done, all the \nwork, all the FMI’s advice, all the economists, all the good works that the Ministers were \ndoing, all goes to water because you have a new Minister of Finance who found this too \ncomplicated. He did not understand it and therefore he changed it. That was the first reason. \nThe second reason is even more laughable. The second reason is – and you will all \nlaugh – we are moving away from a Programme-Based Budgeting Approach to a more \nPerformance-Based Budget Approach. He is eliminating programme-based, he is going back \nto line budgeting and he is saying that he is doing it and moving to performance-based. So, I \ndon’t know what he had taken on that day before giving his speech. \n(Interruptions) \nYes, maybe that.  \nAnd then the third reason was that this amendment to the Bill, he said, will also \ncontribute to promote accountability and transparency in the management of public money. \nTotally the opposite, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, because it did not bring any accountability and \ntransparency.  \nEvery year, the Director of Audit in his Report highlights wastage of public funds, \nmainly due to lack of planning, lack of proper monitoring in the implementation phase. I was \nChairperson of Public Accounts Committee, you were Chairperson of Public Accounts \nCommittee, we could see week in, week out, how projects were not being implemented \nbecause there was no thought process in it, there was no regular monitoring and planning that \nwent through. Transparency, not at all. You would recall, hon. Members who were here in the \nlast mandate, we could not ask questions. What they did is they took money from the budget, \n\n146 \n \nput it in Special Purpose Vehicles, including Mauritius Investment Corporation, we were not \nallowed to ask a single question on Mauritius Investment Corporation. We were not allowed \nto ask questions on CEB, subsidiaries of CEB because they were companies. So, there was \nabsolutely no transparency. Management, it was totally mismanaged.  \nYou know what they did the last five years, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the budget had \nbecome a mockery because the then Minister of Finance, every single year would come with \nSupplementary Appropriation Bills and put us in a fait accompli. Sometimes he would come \ntwice, sometimes three times. In 2021, he came out with three Supplementary Appropriation \nBills which shows that they could not care less about budgeting, they were just spending, \nthey were just doing whatever they wanted and they had a majority, they would just come \naprès les faits accomplis, tell us to ratify whatever they were spending. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, now what we are proposing is a simplified version and I agree \nwith the Leader of the Opposition that we will need to have training. I agree that the civil \nservants will have to change their mindset because it was easy to have just an expenditure \nitem every year in the budget, now they would have to actually think about a programme over \nthree years or more middle term or long term and then they will have to monitor it and they \nwill be answerable to Parliament for that. So, we will have to come up with output and \noutcome. \nSo, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I fully support this Bill. It is a step in the right direction to \nbring fiscal discipline, transparency, accountability in management of public funds. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Rookny! \n(9.22 p.m.) \nMr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet): Mr Deputy Speaker, \nSir, I stand before you today in strong support of the Finance and Audit (Amendment) Bill \n2025. A landmark reform that will revolutionalise how public funds are managed in \nMauritius.  \nThis Bill not only sets the pace by which this Government intends to manage taxpayers’ \nmoney but it also sends out a clear message. The message is that we will adhere strictly to \ndiscipline, something that was sadly missing in the MSM-led government. \n\n147 \n \nWe need to look at this Bill in the current context. On the one hand, we have the failing \nstate of an economy left by MSM in this country and on the other hand, we have a nation full \nof hope, tired of waiting and thirsty to see things happen immediately. We will undoubtedly \ntake the appropriate steps, on a la volonté politique but as the Deputy Prime Minister, hon. \nPaul Bérenger said – l’économie s’en fout de la volonté politique. To gauge the full weight of \nthis Bill, we have to look at it in the wake of the series of Bills that will be introduced in this \nParliament, the regulations that will follow the enactment of this Bill and the reforms that will \nalso follow shortly. \nThis is not just another financial amendment. This is a necessary transformation \nensuring every rupee spent by the Government aligns with results, efficiency and \ntransparency. Why do we need this Bill? We do not need to go very far from today. The \nReport of the Director of Audit for the Government’s account for Year 2022-23 said it loud \nand clear. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, allow me to quote the part that hit me harder – \n“83% of Ministries and Government have not complied with Section 4B of the Finance \nand Audit Act in respect of submission of their report on Performance within statutory \ndeadline.” \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the previous regime did not only spy on its people, they lied to \nMauritians and deprived them of information altogether. Everything was put at play to put \nour people in a state of anaesthesia where the MSM thought our people will not be not be \nable to take any informed decision at all. We may have coined the name of our alliance as \n‘Alliance du Changement’ but change was really brought about by Mauritians who, by their \nwill and their pen booted out an autocratic regime. It is now our job to make sure that our \ngénérations futures will have the right tools to be able to make informed decisions. \nMaybe everybody will not always agree with us but at least, they will have the \ninformation available to intelligently agree or disagree with us. This is one of the intended \nconsequences of this Bill. Once enacted, those who spend or invest taxpayers’ money will be \nincentivised or compelled to provide information or risk being deprived of funding. That is \nwhat Performance-Based Budgeting is about.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, public sector budgeting has focused primarily on inputs, \nallocating funds based on past expenditures rather than performance but does simply \nspending more money guarantee better services? Does a larger budget automatically mean \ngreater efficiency? The answer is no. One of the major problems we have in Mauritius is \n\n148 \n \ndrugs. Be it drug dealing or drug addiction, Government is spending huge sums of taxpayers’ \nmoney in repression and on treatment. The question to ask is – whether the money being \nspent are achieving the intended results or are they achieving anything at all. Are we not \nfunding failures? Should we not be having different programmes? The same thing applies to \nthe health sector. We may have the best Health Minister, we may have the best people in the \nhospitals but at the same time, we may be running the wrong programmes. \nAt the moment, we know we are on the podium for diabetes, heart disease and kidney \ndisease. Apparently, our score for cancer is not great either. It is about time to tie up our \nobjectives with the resources we want to invest on resolving our problems. This Bill, when \nenacted, will ensure that Government funds are not just spent but invested in programmes \nthat deliver measurable benefits to our people. The two main elements that appear to me in \nthis Bill are Performance-Based Budgeting where results achieved will be tracked and not \njust amount spent; where Ministries will have to define objectives clearly and measure \noutcomes; where we will have to impose on ourselves greater fiscal discipline to Government \noperations. \nAlso, increased transparency and accountability, nothing needs to be said on this. In \nwhat world, more transparency with what is done with taxpayers’ money harmful? Citizen \noversight of tax expenditures will be improved. Real power will be placed where it ought to \nbe, that is, in the hands of our people. Today, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we have the benefit of \ninsight. We must learn from the shortcomings of other countries and of our own. Countries \nwhich have implemented this budgeting methodology, numerous papers having examined the \nmethodology, now recommend that we need to make sure that we have meaningful \nperformance indicators and not just carry out a tick-box exercise. \nWe need to ensure proper training for Government departments and also modernise \nfinancial reporting systems, maybe use of AI to simplify tasks that are complex or \ncumbersome. This is not an experimental law. Countries like the USA, UK, Australia, and \nFrance have successfully implemented Performance-Based Budgeting. They are not without \nchallenges. France initially struggled with excessive reporting requirements. South Africa \nsaw agencies prioritising easier to achieve indicators. New Jersey experienced resistance due \nto fundamental shifts in budget structure. \nNow, we can learn from this. Therefore, we know there will be merit in addressing \nresistance to change by maybe implementing as the hon. Prime Minister said, a gradual \n\n149 \n \ntransition with capacity building programmes and data collection and measurement by using \nstrengthened data systems and independent audits. We also need to address the tick-box \nbureaucracy by having realistic indicators linked to national priorities. This reform will bring \n– \n(i) tangible benefits; \n(ii)  better public services in healthcare, education and infrastructure;  \n(iii)reduce wasteful spending, stronger economic growth, and  \n(iv) investor confidence. \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this Bill is about building a more accountable and effective \nGovernment. Mauritius stands at cross roads. We cannot continue with the statu quo. We have \nto embrace a modern results-driven approach to budgeting. Let us ensure every rupee delivers \ntangible benefit to our citizens. Let us put power back in the hands of our people. I have no \ndoubt that all hon. Members will support this Bill for a more efficient, transparent and \nresults-driven Mauritius.  \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Jhummun! \n(9.33 p.m.) \nMr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac): Merci, \nM. le président. Après avoir écouté l’honorable leader de l’opposition, je peux conclure qu’il \ns’est transformé en un prophète de malheur. Il nous souhaite tout le malheur du monde – une \napproche négative et pessimiste, et il a même rentré dans la démagogie. \nI would like to remind him that we do not want episodes like today, where the hon. \nPrime Minister said the cost almost doubled within a three-year period at the Air Traffic \nTerminal, SSR.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this Bill is very technical. I will try to avoid the technicalities \nso as to reach out to a wider audience. In this world of scarcity, almost nothing is free. Rien \nn’est jamais donné pour rien. There is no such thing as free lunches. We cannot allow a \nmisuse of the economic resources of the country. I reiterate what I said in my maiden speech. \nThere is no such thing as State money. There is only public’s money. Each rupee counts. \nEach rupee must be used in the most effective way. Taxpayers’ money must be so spent that \nwe generate the maximum benefit from each unit of expenditure.  \n\n150 \n \nM. le président, year in year out, the Audit Report published by the National Audit \nOffice shows how public’s money is being wasted, drained and in some cases even looted. \nWe cannot turn a blind eye to what is happening. Business as usual is not an option ! Étant un \ngouvernement responsable, on ne peut pas rester immobile, ne rien faire, serrer le coude \ncontre le corps ou porter des gants. Ce projet de loi tombe à point nommé. \nM. le président, I congratulate the hon. Dr. Navin Ramgoolam who is also the \nMinister of Finance to propose the amendment to the Finance and Audit Bill. The object of \nthe Bill has been spelt out very clearly and accordingly, amendments have been made to the \ndifferent clauses. However, the crux of the Bill is the introduction of Performance-Based \nBudgeting (PBB). In order to the link funds with results, improve operational efficiency in \nGovernment administration and enforce greater fiscal responsibility, accountability and \ntransparency. \nM. le président, PBB is a critical reform being introduced by the Government, that ties \nfunding allocations to measurable results, ensuring that taxpayer’s money is being spent \neffectively and efficiently. It is designed to ensure – \n(1) \nefficiency where funds will be used in the most appropriate manner, reducing \nwastes and inefficiencies, and \n(2) \nfiscal responsibility where government funds will be managed prudently, \ngenerating fiscal space for new spending initiatives, enhance facilitate fiscal \nconsolidation, that is, reducing deficits and debts. \n(3) \naccountability where the different ministries will be responsible for their \nactions and effects. \n(4) \ntransparency where the basis of any democracy lies in transparency. This will \nimprove the trust and confidence of the population on public administration.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, from the very outset, key economic decision-makers will \nsystematically take into account the results to be achieved by expenditure. PBB is a result \noriented, as rightly pointed out by the hon. Prime Minister. Funding will be a function of \nresults or outcomes. This is why it is also known as managing for results which is very useful \nin civil service reforms to increase motivation and incentives and strengthen public \naccountability for performance. The goals and objective are at the centre of PBB. It is an \ninput-output relationship where the output in this case is mostly in terms of services. \n\n151 \n \nM. le président, this Bill is so explicit that it has taken care to distinguish between \nprogramme and sub-programmes, estimates of expenditure and estimates of revenue in \nclauses 3,4 and 5. In clause 3, it has also stated that the outcomes, specific objectives and \noutputs need to be verifiable with a defined target, a given budget and necessary resources, \nincluding staffing. \nM. le président, neither spending too much, which is a waste of resources nor spending \ntoo little, which we prevent us attaining our target is desirable. Accordingly, clause 4 of the \nBill makes provision for a progress report on performance in respect to outcomes achieved \nand outputs delivered.  \nM. le président, if we do not know where we are going, we will always end up \nsomewhere else. So, there is a need for a review system, checks and balances and more \nimportantly, costs and benefits of expenditure outcomes upon the society and the national \neconomy. For this, Key Performance Indicators (KPI) must be at work. The KPI can be \nquantitative, qualitative or subjective data. They need to be measurable, justified, verified and \naccounted for. Hence, the expected outcome to be achieved must be explicitly defined and the \nKPI must be so designed that it is able to measure the effectiveness and efficiency of the \nservice provider. \nM. le président, for this system to work, there is a need for reliable and timely \ninformation. However, government authorities in the last 10 years are faced with a series of \ntime lags such as – \nrecognition lags - the time taken to recognise a problem like COVID; \nimplementation lags - the time taken to implement any decision;  \ndecision lags;  \nexecution lags, and  \nin the case of PBB, there can be behavioural lags - the time taken for civil servants to \nadapt to this new system.  \nI can even say in some cases, I have seen ethical lags where Members of the Opposition are \nabsent when such an important Bill is being passed. One of them has not even been present to \nlisten to his colleague, the Leader of Opposition! They dare to show us what ethical \nbehaviour is! \n\n152 \n \nThe progress report on performance must not be artificial, arbitrary or subject to \nwindow dressing. It is important that decision makers see to it that there is no window-\ndressing. \nM. le président, this Bill is not designed to penalise whomsoever as they may pretend. \nInstead, it is designed to motivate people to work, outdo themselves and increase their \ncommitment to the programme and sub-programme, making ir more likely that they will \nproduce the desired results. \nThis Government believes in treating people as people. Those who are performing will \nbe given a pat on the back. Those excelling will be rewarded. Those who are \nunderperforming will be incentivised to perform better.  \nM. le président, allow me to quote the IMF, I quote – \n“If the political and bureaucratic leadership is highly corrupt and rent-seeking, with \nlittle interest in improving public sector performance, performance-based budgeting \nwill be a waste of effort.” \nThis is why the previous government put an end to PBB! If you have a corrupt mind, \nyou cannot come with such a Bill. Only advocates of transparency and accountability, like the \nhon. Prime Minister and his team, has dared to come again with PBB. \nThank you for your kind attention. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Minister, Dr. Mrs Jeetun! \n(9.43 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning (Dr. Mrs J. Jeetun): Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, I stood here a few weeks ago to deliver my inaugural speech on the \nGovernment Programme, and I said that for too long our country has been held back. We \nwant more and we demand more. More for Mauritius, more for the people of Mauritius. I had \nalso said that the foundation of our country is broken, the people have voted to end the era of \ndecay. The people have voted for change. The people, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, now expect \ndelivery. They demand execution and they want to see results, and this is precisely what this \nGovernment is doing. We are laying the ground work to rebuild the foundation of this broken \ncountry.  \nThe Prime Minister presented the State of the Economy in December last year. The \npeople discovered with dismay the dire state of the country’s finances. So, there is little \n\n153 \n \nmoney but there are great expectations. It is therefore, our duty to make sure that there is \nvalue for money for every rupee of public money spent. Not only we need to deliver results, \nwe also need to be held accountable for delivering on those results and this is what this \nlegislation is about, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Moving towards a performance-based budgeting \nmeans we will be judged not on the efforts that we put in but, on the outcomes, because what \nmatters is the result. What matters is the performance; what matters is the outcome. \nOutcomes that are measured by smart KPIs, meaning KPIs that are specific, that are \nmeasurable, that are achievable, that are relevant and that are time-bound. Basically, we are \nlooking for efficiency, we are looking for effectiveness, and we are looking for quality. Some \nmay argue that in the public sector it is more difficult to have performance measurement \nindicators. However, if we consider efficiency, effectiveness, and quality, we can measure \nefficiency, for example, by the number of cases handled by FSC or as the Prime Minister just \nsaid, the number of patients treated in a hospital. Effectiveness can be measured by the \nnumber of successful applications processed and service quality can be measured by the \nwaiting time to process an application or the waiting time in hospitals.  \nSo, performance budgeting, I must say, will hold first and foremost Ministers, et je dis \nbien, Ministers accountable for results and performance in our line Ministries. It is very \nimportant to understand that first and foremost it is the Ministers who are accountable. It is \nvery important that this performance-based budgeting is championed by the political leaders. \nIt will also hold accountable senior public officers. Following procedures and being \ncompliant with rules will no longer be sufficient. It is essential that those procedures lead to \noutcomes in a timely manner and within quality standards. It is important to note that we \nneed to have the buy-in of the senior officials in the public sector without whom we cannot \nachieve the results. This could mean that we will need to provide training and support to \npublic officers as this is a drastic change that requires a culture change, a change of mindset. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I must commend the Prime Minister who also holds the \nportfolio of Ministry of Finance, for the courage and audacity of bringing a performance-\nbased budgeting from the very first year in Government. Over a hundred countries have \nadopted this method. Advanced nations like the US, Canada, Japan, most OECD countries, \nemerging countries like China, India, South Africa, even developing countries have adopted \nPBB. So, Mauritius cannot lag behind. And as I said, performance budgeting will align \nexpenditure with the strategic goals and priorities of Government. It will promote a \nmanagement of culture that focuses on performance.  \n\n154 \n \nPerformance measurement will encourage comparison and competition between similar \nentities as a means of improving effectiveness and efficiency in service provision. \nPerformance budgeting offers a wide range of potential benefits. It contributes to more \nefficient allocation of funds and a better understanding of Government achievements and \npriorities as well as better transparency and accountability throughout the budget process. It \nhelps Government understand if goals have been met and if changes should be made to \nallocate resources to deliver on promised results. For line Ministries, performance budgeting \nprovides us with tools to make a stronger case to Government in support of our budget \nproposal. If we can demonstrate strong deliverables such as a stronger GDP contribution, \nmore job creation, maintain FATF compliance, faster processing time for permits and \nlicences, high profits in our corporations, establishment of the National Planning Framework \nwithin the set timeline, all these will allow us to substantiate our budget proposals.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, for citizens and civil society, performance budgeting will offer \ngreater transparency and accountability in respect of purposes and results of public spending \nand allow the opening of the black box of the budget. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, having led private sector enterprises for a good part of my \nprofessional life, I cannot but applaud this initiative. This is really music to our ears. We have \nthe commitment and willpower at the political leadership level to implement this. Because we \nmean business, we owe this to every taxpayer in this country. With performance-based \nbudgeting, there is no reason why we will not be able to deliver the so much awaited result \nthat the public is waiting for. \nThank you very much. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you.  Hon. Parapen! \n(9.51 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \n(Mr K. Parapen): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the word paradigm shift is defined as a great and \nimportant change in the way something is done or thought about. This expression has often \nwrongly been used in society, especially by politicians who, let us face it, some of them have \na tendency to use grand expressions to paper over their shallow thoughts. I hope I will not be \njoining their ranks today when I refer to the potential of this Bill, especially the introduction \nof performance-based budgeting as having the potential in bringing about a real paradigm \nshift. \n\n155 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the people of the Republic have high expectations. For years \nthey have had to endure the sheer mismanagement when it comes to the public administration \nof affairs of the Republic. There is a seemingly unquenchable thirst among the population for \naccountability when it comes to the allocation of public funds. This Bill aims to lay the \nground work to restore confidence in the action of Government. For far too long, the art of \nbudgeting has relied on approximations. \nIt is high time that we do away with the trial-and-error culture of the previous \ngovernment and that we move towards a more rigorous methodology.  \nAs I see it, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the introduction of Performance-Based Budgeting \nheralds the dawn of a top-down approach to the public allocation of resources, that is, one \nwhere the ultimate objectives of Government become the driving forces behind all the \nprogrammes and sub-programmes being initiated. In other words, we are moving towards a \nworld where we define our journey based on where we want to be. \nWith your permission, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would now like to touch upon a few \npoints which are not mentioned in this Bill but which, I feel, are of paramount importance if \nthis proposed piece of legislation is to be a real game changer. Firstly, I would like to draw \nthe attention of this House on the need for synchronicity. Most of the consultants we had the \nopportunity to interact with, as well as all the savvy well-wishers of this Government, have \ninvariably highlighted the need for Government to stop working in silos and to work as one \nsynchronised unit. To this end, I believe that there is a need for Performance-Based \nBudgeting to be applied to a macro framework, that is, an identification of objectives of \nGovernment at a higher level than at Ministries level, be it for high-powered committee or \ninter-ministerial committee. It is thus essential to identify the outcomes we want at macro \nlevel first, be it social or economic, and then have those objectives drilled down across \nMinistries. For example, the concept of Enn pei kot fer bon viv is an outcome, which I would \nclassify personally, as a macro-outcome. And then, it is for Government to define the outputs \nassociated with such an outcome and have it drilled down through different Ministries. This \nwould ensure synchronicity of actions and avoid the dreaded silo syndrome.  \nAnother point I wanted to highlight and which has been touched upon by several other \npeople intervening today, is the dire need for data collection, data analysis and research \nwithin the public sector. In a world driven by big data, Mauritius is, unfortunately, lagging \n\n156 \n \nvery far behind. Performance-Based Budgeting can only be effective if the outputs are clearly \ndefined, insightful, relevant, and most importantly, available. For example, within the Social \nIntegration Division of the Ministry where I am currently posted, we only have two \nstatisticians for the whole Ministry. One can only imagine how restrictive the exercise of \nperformance appraisal has been and will be if we do not change things. So, I would advocate \nfor a major revamp of our approach to data collection, data analysis and research.  \nThe previous regime destroyed the credibility of Statistics Mauritius while setting up a \nnew body, Maurice Stratégie, whose ultimate aim was to glorify ‘Padanomics’. The former \nMinister of Finance did not believe in economics and ultimately, I think it is fair to say, \neconomics stopped believing in him. I would strongly support the shutting down of Maurice \nStratégie and lobby for a major revamp of Statistics Mauritius to empower it to become the \nleading data collection, data analysis and research body in Mauritius. Such an institution \nshould have the ability to provide accurate, in-depth insight in the works of all the Ministries \nand be the trusted provider of outputs indicators to Government in order to optimise \nPerformance-Based Budgeting.  \nIn the same vein, preserving the integrity of data collection is equally important to \nsafeguard the new approach being proposed. As such, rigorous and reliable auditing of the \ndata being collected and analysed is a must. We would advocate for a risk-based approach \nwhereby outputs identified as being high-risk would command a high level of control and \nthose identified as low-risk would command a low level of control. By doing so, Government \nwould provide the necessary safeguards while optimising resources. \nThe final point I would like to touch upon, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, is probably outside \nthe scope of this Bill. However, since we are talking about laying the groundwork for \nperformance and accountability in the public sector, I feel it is highly relevant to talk about \nthe alignment of objectives of all stakeholders, particularly civil servants.  \nWe dream of a country where Ministries outperform and where civil servants deliver \nthe goods and the cornerstone of such a dream has to be the alignment of the objectives of \nGovernment with that of civil servants. So, isn’t it time, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, to consider \nincentivising public officials with both financial and non-financial perks linked to \nperformance-related objectives?  \n\n157 \n \nWhile it could prove, I agree, quite complex and challenging to assess the performance \nof public employees on an individual basis, the idea of an across-the-board annual \nperformance reward or bonus, should the country achieve some measurable and well-thought \nof macro targets, should be entertained in my humble opinion. \nTo conclude, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me reiterate one more time the potential for a \nparadigm shift of this Bill. It is an approach, as rightly mentioned by Dr. the hon. Mrs Jeetun, \nwhich is widely used by OECD countries across the world and other developed countries. I \nam reminded that Performance-Based Budgeting approach was implemented in Mauritius as \nearly as 2008. When we think that the European Union only adopted it in mid-2010, we can \nonly dream of what might have been had we persevered in that direction for the last few \nyears. Unfortunately, it was discontinued, no need to mention by whom, but had it been \nmaintained, we would surely have a functioning results-driven public sector today.  \nI also want to reply to the hon. Leader of the Opposition because in his usual \nintellectual dishonesty, he referred to a report, the Collaborative Africa Budget Reform \nInitiative (CABRI), which was published in 2013, and he said that in that report, Mauritius \nonly scored highly on 9 out of 16 criteria but I have a report here, and well, it is right to say \nthat we only scored highly on 9 out of 16 but as hon. Uteem mentioned, when you start a new \nprogramme, you are bound to have teething issues. I would like to draw the attention of the \nHouse on the conclusion of that report. So, the conclusion is, and I quote – \n“Whereas implementation of strategic budgeting in Mauritius needs to be consolidated \nand deepened, the country’s progress in this area has received international recognition \nand has led several requests for the sharing of its experience with other countries, \nincluding from Botswana, Ethiopia, Liberia, Lesotho, Madagascar and Namibia (…)”  \nSo, back in 2013, countries were looking to Mauritius to learn from our experience. We \nhad something to share, we had something which we could be proud of. A bit more than 10 \nyears down the line, the government of destruction has been at works. Today, you have this \nLeader of Opposition criticising a new method which was pioneered for the southern African \nregions and southern hemisphere region by Mauritius. He dares to criticise that in Parliament \ntoday. I think he should have done his homework a little bit more.  \nSo, to finish, I would like to say that like in life, it’s never too late to start again. As one \nvery famous Chinese proverb says – \n\n158 \n \n“The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second-best time is now.” \nThank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Damry! \n(10.04 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Finance (Mr D. Damry): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, allow me \nto cite two quotes that would set the tone for my speech. Firstly, management guru, Peter \nDrucker – \n “What cannot be measured, cannot be managed.”  \nSecondly, Scientist Lord Kelvin – \n “What cannot be measured, cannot be improved.”  \nTherefore, an outcome driven Performance-Based Budgeting constitutes the first set of \neconomic reforms recommended by the OACD and the IMF to better manage and improve \nthe budget process as part of our larger fiscal consolidation framework.  \nThe Prime Minister and speakers before me have sufficiently canvassed the technical \nmerits of outcome driven PBB and the building blocks of outcome driven PBB, i.e., outcome, \noutcome indicators, programmes, sub-programmes, activities, outputs and Key Performance \nIndicators.  \nTherefore, what I will try to do in my speech is to try to use practical examples to \ndemonstrate how – I am repeating that a lot of time. You will see why – outcome driven PBB \nwill be an enabler in the implementation of the Government Programme for the five budgets \nwith greater efficiency, fiscal responsibility, transparency and accountability.  \nBefore I go there, I would like to delve a little bit in outcome. I would like all of us to \nhave the same understanding of outcome. What does it mean in this Bill? Because this Bill is \ntailored a bit on the OECD model. We are in 2025, and we are following the best practices \nthat we have learnt through other countries. \nSo, let me take you back to Vaghjee Hall. Last week, Prime Minister Modi was here \nand he launched something called MAHASAGAR: Mutual and Holistic Advancement for \nSecurity and Growth across Regions. If we follow Prime Minister Modi, you will see in \nIndia, his language, he talks about Jan Dhan, financial inclusion. He talks about Vasudhaiva \n\n159 \n \nKutumbakam: one Earth, one family, one future. See, what does outcome do? Outcome puts \nthe Mauritian at the centre of the budget process. Outcome is not quantitative. Outcome is \nqualitative. Outcome is service delivery. It is citizen centric.  \nI will give you a few examples. If you look at our Government Programme, a free and \nfair Mauritius is an outcome. The Representation of People Bill that was passed in the House \ntoday is an activity that is contributing towards that outcome.  \nA drug free and crime free Mauritius is an outcome. An easy, accessible, convenient, \naffordable, connected Mauritius is an outcome. A competitive and intelligent Mauritius is an \noutcome. Now, let me build slightly more on outcome. So, maybe, a gender equal and \ninclusive Mauritius is an outcome. So, if this is an outcome, how do you measure the \noutcome indicator? Because its qualitative.  \nI was in a conference yesterday about women entrepreneurship. Now, we have a \nGender Gap Report by the World Economic Forum and Mauritius ranks 107 out of 147 \ncountries. So, that is an outcome indicator. So, through outcome driven PBB, the strategic \noutcome for the Ministry for Gender could be that we move from that to the top 50% during \nour mandate. I am not suggesting this is what you are going to decide, but I am just giving an \nexample. So, this could be an outcome and an outcome indicator. \nI would like to build on hon. Parapen said.  I will argue that this Bill already provides \nfor the microframework that you were talking about. Now, how do you get there? So, you \nneed to know where you are today. I have been told to reach gender parity in Mauritius in the \nprivate sector, top leadership positions, you need at least 200 years. Are the women of \nMauritius willing to wait for 200 years? Are the men who are feminists like me willing to \nwait for 200 years? I do not think so! What do we do?  \nLet us see where we are. So, I asked them a question: what do women who lead micro, \nsmall and medium enterprises contribute to the GDP of Mauritius and how much employment \ndo they create? If anyone in this House can reply to this question, I will be very grateful. But \nwe don’t have this data, unfortunately! If we do not know where we start, how do we know \nwhere we will reach? So, this is what outcome driven – I insist on that – outcome driven \nperformance-based budgeting will change.  \nTherefore, we will have programmes and sub-programmes and activities to lead us to \nthat outcome. I will also argue that the other thing that an outcome driven PBB does is it \n\n160 \n \nallows you to make choices. At the end of the day, this budget is about choices. So, what \nhappened in Malaysia? We go back many years ago. They were in a similar situation. It \ncompelled them to make decisions because they needed to meet their government \nprogramme. It is a case study at Harvard Business School today. So, what did they do? They \nlooked at what the private sector did. There is something called the Blue Ocean Strategy. \nWhat does the Blue Ocean Strategy mean? It means low cost, high impact, rapid execution \nprojects.  \nThis is what Malaysia did and it’s a case study of how Malaysia progressed. The \noutcome driven PBB will enable us to employ Blue Ocean Strategy and Blue Ocean \nLeadership in the public sector. We can draw from the experience of Malaysia. If I take the \nexample of India, I will argue that outcome driven PBB has a role in lifting India from the \n11th economy in the world to the 5th economy in the world, and perhaps, to the 3rd economy in \nthe world soon. \nSo, now, if you allow me, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to give a practical \nexample. The hon. Leader of the Opposition talked about climate change. Let us talk about \nclimate change. So, a national outcome, as defined in our Government Programme, is to \ncreate a climate resilient and environmentally sustainable Mauritius. So, what does it do? It \nbreaks silos across ministries because it is not the responsibility of only one ministry to \nachieve that. You have so many ministries involved.  \nLet me explain. We start with the Ministry of Environment. That is climate resilience. \nThey have the responsibility to determine what we call Nationally Determined Contributions \n(NDC). You then have the Ministry of Public Utilities because this means you have to reduce \ngreenhouse emissions. So, you have to build more renewable power.  \nThen you have climate diplomacy because we raise money from Development \nFinancial Institutions (DFI) and overseas funders, and today, DFIs they do not fund on \nvulnerability, they fund on GDP per capita. Mauritius is already high on that list; we do not \nget money on that. So, we have to advocate for more vulnerability and then you come to the \nMinistry of Finance. Let us say, the previous Government had NDC 1.0, they said you need \nUSD6.5 billion to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40%, now, over 10 years. So, we have \na Climate and Sustainability Fund where I believe you have about Rs3 billion per year that \nyou collect in the Climate and Sustainability Fund. Rs3 billion is not enough, so what does \nthe Ministry of Finance do? How can you make the Rs3 billion, how can you leverage the \n\n161 \n \nRs3 billion and make it Rs30 billion? So, the Ministry of Finance will have to look at \nmobilisation and it is not that it is not being done. Take Indonesia, the third largest \ngreenhouse gas emission producer in the world, so what did they do? They converted a pure \ngovernment facility into a blended facility. What this means is that they have the Indonesia \nClimate Fund where the Government of Indonesia puts its money as what we call a General \nPartner (GP), then you have other DFIs, say the World Bank, the UNDP, l’Agence française \nde développement they come as limited partners, then you have family officers, you have \nendowments, so, this is how you can increase the amount of money in the fund. We are at the \nmoment at the Ministry of Finance speaking with the UK Taskforce, AFD, all these DFIs and \nguess what? Performance is key. If there is no outcome driven performance-based budgeting \nin your government you will not get a single cent from them. \nNow, let us see what the previous government did. I really do not like to go into politics \nbut this is what they determined. So, you know what they did? Out of USD6.5 billion which \nwas their estimate, they spent USD420 m. Guess what happened? The share of renewable \nenergy decreased from 22% to 17%, if the share of renewable energy decreased this means \ngreenhouse gas emissions increased. So, they spent taxpayers’ money but they did not meet \nthe output and/or the outcome.  \nI think there is no debate in the world today that outcome driven PBB is what is \nrequired in Mauritius but to make it work, and this is coming from the best practices all over \nthe world, you have to have monitoring and evaluation. We should all be thankful to the hon. \nPrime Minister for setting up the High-powered Committee on the Government Programme. \nThe other thing is that the monitoring and evaluation body should not act as a control agency, \nit should act as a centre of excellence and this is what we are going to try to do. \nI know I am pressed for time, but I would like to add one more point is you allow me, \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Just one more minute! \nMr Damry: Yes. The hon. Prime Minister said that we will bring all local authorities \nand Rodrigues under PBB, we will do more than that. Other than the Fiscal Responsibility \nAct, the Government of Mauritius is also implementing International Public Sector \nAccounting Standards (IPSAS), and what this means is that we will consolidate the financial \nstatements of every single state-owned enterprise and special funds – which the IMF does not \nlike and we have six of them in this country – under our national balance sheet. This means \n\n162 \n \nnot only the Consolidated Fund, not only the local authorities but also the state-owned \nenterprises and the special funds will be subject to PBB. I do not have time, I would have \nloved, you know… \nThe Deputy Speaker: You will have another opportunity. \nMr Damry: Okay. Then I wanted to say something about the public servants because \nwithout them we cannot do it, but I would like to end on only one note and I hope that the \nHouse follows on this. Nelson Mandela said – \n“Nothing is impossible until it’s done.” \nAnd this is what we are going to do. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Minister Ameer Meea! \n(10.18 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Industry, SME & Coorperatives (Mr A. Ameer Meea): Thank you, \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, for allowing me to intervene on the Finance and Audit (Amendment) \nBill 2025 which is being considered by this august Assembly. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this \nBill represents a significant step in strengthening our public financial management \nframework, enhancing transparency, accountability and efficiency in the administration of \npublic funds. Moving from a line-item budget to a performance-based budgeting system \npresents several challenges, including resistance to change. But, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, \nMauritius stands at a cross road. \nToday, our economy faces rising debt, budget deficits and global uncertainties. We \ncannot afford complacency, we must act decisively, wisely and boldly. The need for this \namendment arises following the commitment taken by our Government to redress the state of \nthe economy. The previous government crippled our institutions, left our economy in tatters \nand ran the country into the ground. Its policy of economic and political clientelism made it a \npoint of no return where public funds were recklessly squandered into an effort to maintain \npower. They adopted an approach of injecting money into the economy without any \nproductive activity to sustain it. What our nation urgently requires is a responsible and \nstrategic use of public funds ensuring that every rupee spent is geared towards tangible \nproductive outcomes, and this is exactly why this Bill has been brought before this Assembly.  \nLet me come to the state of the economy which is damning on how public finances \nwere handled during the last 10 years. It is good to highlight and it is good to open the eyes of \n\n163 \n \nthe population that over the past year, the fiscal position of the country has been marked by \nsignificant challenges. The actual budget deficit for financial year 2023-24 stood at Rs38 \nbillion representing 5.7% of GDP.  This figure far exceeds the revised estimates of Rs27.4 \nbillion that is 3.9% of GDP as published in the 2024-25 Budget Estimates document. Looking \nahead projections with no change in our fiscal policy for financial year 2024-25, that is, this \nyear, indicate a continued financial fiscal strain with the budget deficit expected to reach \nRs48.5 billion that is 6.7% of GDP. This represents a sharp increase from the initial estimate \nof Rs26.8 billion and underscores the urgent need for corrective measures.  \nThe rising budget deficit has had a direct impact on our public sector debt which has \nmore than doubled over the past decade. The level of public sector gross debt has increased \nfrom Rs238 billion as at December 2014, to Rs559 billion as at end of June 2024, that is, \nmore than double over 10 years, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. This is above the statutory debt \nceiling of 80% which necessitates immediate intervention to restore fiscal discipline and \nwithout intervention, public sector is projected to reach Rs612 billion by June 2025. As a \npercentage of GDP, the debt ratio would further increase to 84.5%. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, \nthis downgrading of the public finances has to stop. This is why this Government is ushering \nin a new economic order, one that breaks away from inefficiency, eliminates wastes and \nrestores faith in public finance management.  \nThe Finance and Audit Act which has historically provided the legal foundation for \npublic financial administration in Mauritius requires amendments to improve efficiency and \nalign the public sector with contemporary fiscal management principles.  \nThe key provision of this amendment Bill can be summarised as follows – \n\nThe amendment reinforces the adoption of PBB ensuring that Government \nallocations are driven by well-defined objectives and measurable indicators; \n\nMinistries and public entities will now plan and present their expenditure \nrequirements through structured programmes and sub-programmes, facilitating \ngreater coherence in policy implementation; \n\nA more forward-looking approach will be adopted whereby estimates of \nexpenditure and revenue will be formulated on a three-year rolling cycle, \nallowing for enhanced fiscal trade activity and strategic resource allocation; \n\n164 \n \n\nThis shift will enable public institution to focus on delivering tangible results \nby aligning resource allocation with expected outputs and developmental \ngoals. They will be compelled to demonstrate how funding translates into \nconcrete outputs and national progress. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, for too long, public expenditure has been viewed merely as \nallocation in a budget without a direct link to concrete outputs that impact the lives of our \ncitizens. This amendment seeks to change by requiring Ministries and departments to prepare \nthe estimates of expenditure on a three-year rolling basis outlining specific resources, \nexpected outputs and targeted outcomes. This amendment is crucial for enhancing public trust \nin Government handling of public funds. It will provide stronger checks and balances to \nprevent financial mismanagement and ensure that taxpayer’s money is used efficiently and \ntransparently. \nThis will also enhance our country’s reputation among international investors and \ndevelopment partners. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let it be heard far and wide, this Government \nmeans business. We are not here to maintain the status quo; we are here to deliver on the \npromises we made to the people of Mauritius. The Government Programme 2025-2029 is our \nguiding principle and Performance-Based Budgeting is a corner stone of that vision. Without \na performance driven approach, we risk spending without productivity leading to inefficiency \nand economic stagnation. This Bill ensures that our financial decisions are evidence-based, \nforward looking and geared towards national development.  \nTo conclude, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me reaffirm that this Bill is not just about \nlegal reforms but about transforming our Public Finance Eco System. It will foster a culture \nof responsibility and efficiency within the public sector while ensuring that Government \nexpenditure remains aligned with national priorities and development objectives.  \nThis year we will not just plan a budget; we will shape the future of Mauritius, a \nstronger economy, a more responsible Government, a bridge to the future and a better \ntomorrow for all.  \nI am done. Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Prime Minister! \n(10.27 p.m.) \n\n165 \n \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, first of all, I would like to thank hon. \nMembers genuinely, from our side I should say, who have intervened on this Bill. It is really \nencouraging to see our backbenchers at that level; the Junior Ministers, the Ministers also, of \ncourse. The hon. Leader of the Opposition is not here; I wonder whether I should say it.  He \nseems to have completely forgotten how they managed the economy. I am glad hon. Ameer \nMeea just said it. Il n’y avait pas de discipline ; gaspillage ! Et il dit oui, c’est bon de réduire \nla dette, mais… Toujours ‘yes, but’. \nHe cited the report of these 15 African countries and I am glad. I did not read it, I must \nsay. Hon. Parapen just mentioned the conclusion.  He completely forgot about the conclusion. \nEven what he cited, 9 of the 16; at least we did something. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, discipline demands effort. If we just sit like this and let things \nhappen, we will have the result that we got. I wanted to say he is a oiseau de mauvais augure, \nbut I think what hon. Jhummun said, ‘prophète de malheur’, is better. \nTypical of them! They mismanaged the economy; they drove the country into the \nground, and now they say, ‘oh, let things be as they are!’ In other words, continue to throw \nmoney without accountability. And he mentions ‘what happens if you have COVID’? That’s \nwhy I say prophète de malheur. But nothing is rigid in an economy. If we are faced with an \nemergency, we will have to react to that emergency but not to steal money as they did on \nCovid. That is what they did. So, I cannot say much what he said again but I must thank hon. \nUteem for having gone through what the previous Minister of Finance did. I did not read it, I \nmust say, but it is mind boggling when you think he was in charge of finance. \nWe must identify priorities, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, and we must grasp the metal. We \nmust not allow ourselves to say, ‘well, let things go out there’. Line-by-line would be easier \nfor me, but we need to do what we need to do. The previous government, in fact, took a \nmajor step backward when they reintroduced this line-by-line budgeting at the expense of \nperformance-based budgeting. And there was opacity in the budget; allocations given; \ninefficiencies; wastage. This Bill shows our commitment to sound fiscal stewardship. \nAs many orators said, we want every rupee of the taxpayers’ money to be spent in the \nbest possible way; optimal. I wish to assure the House that what we will introduce is a \nsimplified Performance-Based Budget that will be easy to understand and to implement. The \nMinistry of Finance will actively work with different ministries and departments and provide \nthe necessary support to ensure we can get what we expect.  \n\n166 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me elaborate on some of the major changes because what I \nsaw in a speech, especially of the Opposition, I mean they do not seem to understand – \n(i) \nFirst of all, the role of the Ministry of Finance itself will evolve. It now has \nto obligatorily engage more closely with ministries and departments on \nbudget matters, policy objectives, strategies. Action plans will have to be \ndiscussed more thoroughly in order to achieve this greater efficiency that we \nwant in resource allocation and effectiveness of policies and measures. \n(ii) \nIt will be easier to integrate new concepts. I think somebody mentioned \ngender budgeting, green budgeting. All this will be easier to implement. \n(iii) \nPerformance-Based Budgeting will make it easier to avoid, as I said in my \nopening speech, such things like white elephant projects, policy \ninconsistencies that have been the normal, as if, for the last 10 years. \n(iv) \nAs I said, there will be greater consultation obviously, and coordination \namong the various departments with the Ministry of Finance. \n(v) \nEach programme will have an accounting officer who will be accountable \nfor the delivery of programme outputs and outcomes. \n(vi) \nThe staff Performance Management System will be fully integrated in the \nPBB framework. \n(vii) \nThe role and prerogative of the National Assembly will automatically be \nenhanced. Why? Because Members will now be in a position to ask the right \nquestions, as there will be more information on resource allocation and there \nwill be more information on what the targets are. Questions will focus on \nthe performance in terms of implementation as well as outcomes. \n(viii) Finally, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the public will have a clearer view of the \nconnection between the amount of tax money which is being spent and the \nservices we are providing. \nProgrammes will be become customer focused and more aligned to the expectations and the \nneeds of the population. \nThe previous government, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, has just dished out taxpayers’ \nmoney. I think many already said that before me. They increased the debt level without any \nconsideration to the outcome of the money spent. Purely reckless spending. I am glad hon. \n\n167 \n \nJhummun pointed this out in a PQ this morning on the Airport Tower, about how the prices \nincreased. I think nearly 70% when I look at the figures. \nTo conclude, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me stress that we are not introducing \nperformance-based budgeting as an isolated initiative. This Bill is part of a set of reforms to \nimprove service delivery and fiscal outcomes. Our reforms will focus, as we have rightly said \n- many have said it - on results delivered and not on the processes. They will include, \namongst others, the Civil Service Reform to improve the productivity of civil servants. We \njust inaugurated, with the Prime Minister of India, the Civil Service Institute, which is called \nthe Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute. And civil servants want it. They want to have training; \nthey want to learn more.  It is not a question that they do not want. This will improve the \nproductivity of the Civil Service; organisational restructuring, again to focus on service \ndelivery. As I mentioned, a Fiscal Responsibility Act will come to consolidate the \nprogramme. Together, these actions will ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of public \nservice substantially. \nWith these words, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I want to again thank all the Members who \nparticipated in the debate, and I commend the Bill to the House. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nBill read a second time and committed. \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(The Deputy Speaker in the Chair) \nThe Finance and Audit (Amendment) Bill (No. II of 2025) was considered and agreed \nto. \nOn the Assembly resuming with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair, the Deputy Speaker \nreported accordingly. \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Finance and Audit (Amendment) Bill (No. II of \n2025) was read a third time and passed. \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Tuesday 25 March 2025 at 11.30 a.m. \n\n168 \n \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The House stands adjourned. Adjournment Matters! \nMATTERS RAISED \n(10.39 p.m.) \nMV PEROS BANHOS - VOYAGE SCHEDULE - ADJUSTMENT \nMr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues): Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, \nSir. The issue I am raising tonight is addressed to the hon. Minister responsible for shipping \nas it concerns the voyage of MV Peros Banhos to Rodrigues scheduled on 19 March, with a \nnext trip on 29 March which will transit via Agaléga to reach Rodrigues on 06 April, to be \nfollowed by another voyage scheduled on 15 April. \nMy plea is to humbly request the hon. Minister to consider adjusting the Peros Banhos \nvoyage scheduled for 29 March to go via Rodrigues towards Agaléga in order to avoid any \nshortages, particularly chilled products and some basic commodities. \nThank you. \nThe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries (Dr. A. Boolell): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in fact, I had a meeting in my office today at 1 o’clock \nwith all parties concerned, specifically to address this issue and to make sure that there is no \nshortage of commodities to be delivered in Rodrigues.  It is a very sensitive issue, but there \nare other issues that have been raised and which need to be addressed on a higher level. \nThank you very much. \n(10.41 p.m.) \nBUS LINE NUMBER 2653 – IRREGULARITY SERVICE \nMr R. Beechook (Second Member Flacq & Bon Accueil): Thank you, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker Sir.  I will request the Minister of Land Transport if he could kindly look into the \nabsolute mess in the bus line number 26/53 Flacq-Goodlands-Flacq, whereby buses are \nabsolutely irregular, causing lots of prejudice, especially to the students in the morning and in \nthe afternoon and the people who travel in the localities of Poste de Flacq, Amaury, etc. \n\n169 \n \nThe Minister of Land Transport (Mr Osman Mahomed): I will certainly look into \nit. \nAt 10.39 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 25 March 2025 at \n11.30 a.m. \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nAIR MAURITIUS LTD – PILOTS’ WORKING CONDITIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/167",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 167,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/167) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Metro Express project phase 3 \nconnecting Rose Hill to Réduit and to be subsequently extended to St Pierre via Cote D’or, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a)  whether a feasibility study was carried out thereinto and, if so, table copy thereof, \nindicating the name of the consultant and amount paid thereto, and  \n(b)  the costs of the project, indicating the amount of fund in terms of infrastructural \nwork to be incurred by the Government therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nCWA – PIPE LAYING PROJECT – FUNDS DISBURSED – CONTRACT DETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/168",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 168,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/168) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the pipe laying project across the \nisland, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, \ninformation as to the amount of fund disbursed therefor, indicating – \n(a)  if the project was carried out by contractors or in-house workers, and \n(b)  where works have not yet been completed, and  \n(c)  the reasons as to why these pipes have not been buried at the depth of 900mm as \nper specifications.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPARKING SPACES – PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES –REGULATIONS & \nPROTECTIVE MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/169",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 169,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/169) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to parking spaces reserved to \npersons with disabilities, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the \nspecific law that governs same, indicating – \n(a) \nthe authority which regulates and enforces the proper use of these spaces, and  \n(b) \nthe measures being proposed to protect the rights of these people to enjoy full \naccessibility thereto. \n\n176",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Ministry of Social Integration, Social Security and \nNational Solidarity that free parking permits are issued by its Empowerment Unit to persons \nwith severe mobility issues. \nThese parking permits enable persons with severe disabilities to park their vehicles in \nreserved parking bays within a paid parking zone while easing their access to public places \nlike shopping centres and other amenities. \nI am given to understand that there are 2 types of parking permits that are issued by the \nEmpowerment Unit, namely – \n Yellow Parking permits which are used in any vehicle in which the person with \nsevere disabilities is travelling, and \n Blue Parking permits which are used in the vehicle driven by a person with \ndisabilities or a vehicle owned by an NGO in the disability sector which is used \nfor conveyance of persons with disabilities. \nFurthermore, some 56 parking bays located at strategic places are reserved for disabled \npersons. These dedicated parking bays are painted in blue by the Traffic Management and \nRoad Safety Unit of my Ministry such that they are easily identified. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that enforcement of the proper \nuse of these parking spaces falls under the purview of the Traffic Wardens and Road \nTransport Inspectors of the National Land Transport Authority as well as the Police in \naccordance with Regulation 11(1) (c) of the Road Traffic (Paid Parking) Regulations 2002. \nIn fact, parking spaces reserved for persons with disabilities are regulated under the \nRoad Traffic (Paid Parking) Regulations 2002 and The Road Traffic (Parking Offences) \nRegulations 2004. \nAccordingly, Regulation 9 of the Road Traffic (Paid Parking) Regulations 2002 \nstipulates inter alia that “A vehicle displaying the appropriate sticker issued by the Ministry \nresponsible for the welfare of the disabled may be parked free of charge, for a maximum \nperiod of time indicated on the panel in a parking bay, within a pay parking zone.” I \nunderstand that the duration is 1 or 2 hours depending in which parking zone the vehicle is \nparked. \n\n177 \n \nThis regulation further mentions that “No vehicle other than a vehicle carrying or \nexpected to carry a disabled person and displaying the appropriate sticker issued by the \nMinistry responsible for the welfare of the disabled, shall be parked in a parking bay reserved \nfor persons with disabilities, within a pay parking zone.” \nWith regard part (b) of the question, I am made aware that despite the acute shortage of \nstaffing at the level of the NLTA Inspectorate, daily crackdown exercises are being carried \nout by the 30 Traffic Wardens of the Regulator and the Police during the routine checks. \nTo this effect, I wish to inform the House that a total of 1,640 contraventions have been \nestablished in respect of parking reserved for persons with disabilities during the last three \nyears, comprising 743 contraventions issued by the NLTA and 897 contraventions issued by \nthe Police. \nThe Disability Unit of the Ministry of Social Integration, Social Security and National \nSolidarity will be requested to envisage a review of the design of the existing parking permits \nwhich are issued to persons with disabilities while taking into account the international \nstandards to circumvent tampering or misuse of these permits. \nCOVID-19 PANDEMIC – THERMAL SCANNERS – PROCUREMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/170",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 170,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/170) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the procurement of \nThermal scanners during the COVID-19 Pandemic, he will state the number thereof ordered \nthrough Bo Digital, indicating the – \n(a) \namount disbursed therefor, and  \n(b) \nnumber thereof unused to date.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nMAURITIUS FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION – ELECTIVE GENERAL ASSEMBLY – \nPROCEDURES & COMPOSITION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/171",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 171,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/171) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Mauritius Football Association, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom information as to – \n(a) \nwhether all procedures were followed with regard to the Elective General \nAssembly thereof held on 27 November 2024, indicating the – \n\n178 \n \n(i) \nnames of the candidates standing for the post of President of the \nAssociation, and  \n(ii) \nthe reasons as to why the candidature of Mr E. R. for the post was rejected, \nand  \n(b) \nthe composition of the newly elected managing committee.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nBRITANNIA ORGANIC PROJECT –   STATUS & FUNDS INVESTED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/172",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 172,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/172) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nwhether, in regard to the Britannia Organic project, he will state where matters stand as to the \nwork in progress thereof, indicating the amount of fund invested in the project to date.",
      "answer": "Reply: Following a call for Expression of Interest launched in 2016 in respect of the \nBritannia Organic Zone covering around 66 arpents, 10 promoters were selected, and each \nwas allocated a plot of land ranging from 3.8 arpents to 5 arpents, against payment of an \nannual rental fee of Rs1,000 per arpent for organic farming. The project was launched on 28 \nFebruary 2017, and lease agreements were signed with the selected promoters. \nOut of the Rs20 million earmarked for the Financial Year 2016-2017 for the setting up \nof modern comprehensive infrastructure, only some Rs5 million has been spent on the project \nup to 18 March 2025 in respect of general expenses and facilities such as – \n(i) \npreliminary land preparation works, other administrative costs and the drilling \nof a borehole, which was dry; \n(ii) \nconnection of the organic zone to the Central Electricity Board grid, and \n(iii) \nlaunching ceremony of the organic zone. \nOnly three promoters are still active on site. The project, in its actual form, cannot be \nendorsed as it is not sustainable. It will have to be revised. \n \nFOREIGN WORKERS – DORMITORIES – SURFACE AREA & AMENITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/173",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 173,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/173) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to dormitories put at \nthe disposal of foreign workers as provided for in the Occupational Safety and Health Act, he \n\n179 \n \nwill state the surface area of the rooms and the number of people per room, indicating if they \nare equipped with messroom, bathroom and toilet facilities as per the provisions of the Act.",
      "answer": "Reply: Lodging accommodation for foreign or migrant workers is governed by the \nOccupational Safety and Health Act 2005 and the Occupational Safety and Health \n(Employees’ Lodging Accommodation) Regulations 2011.   \nWith regard to the surface area of rooms, Regulation 12 of the Occupational Safety and \nHealth (Employees’ Lodging Accommodation) Regulations 2011 provides for the minimum \nfloor area of bedrooms depending on the number of employees. It stipulates that where an \nemployee is provided with a single bed, the floor area should not be less than 4.6 square \nmetres; and where any 2 employees are provided with bunk beds, the floor area should not be \nless than 5.2 square metres. The number of employees to be accommodated in a room, \ntherefore, depends on the floor area of that room. At the moment, there is no provision in the \nlaw limiting the number of persons that can be accommodated in one bedroom. So, if you \nhave a big hall, you can accommodate 50 or more workers. This is not satisfactory and raises \nissues of privacy and sanitation. My Ministry is currently working on amendments to the \nOccupational Safety and Health (Employees’ Lodging Accommodation) Regulations 2011. \nWe are proposing to limit the number of lodgers to 12 for each room.  \n \n Insofar as the messroom, bathroom and toilet facilities are concerned, the \nrequirements have been prescribed in the Occupational Safety and Health (Employees’ \nLodging Accommodation) Regulations 2011.  \n Officers of my Ministry ensure that provisions of the law relating to messroom, \nbathroom and toilet facilities are complied with before granting lodging accommodation \npermits to dormitories put at the disposal of migrant workers.  \n I wish to inform the House that my Ministry is working on proposed amendments to \nthe Occupational Safety and Health legislations with a view to further reinforcing safety and \nhealth standards in lodging accommodations for the benefit of migrant workers, which \ninclude the following – \n(a) \nmaximum number of lodgers in a bedroom; \n(b) \nappointment of cleaner for regular cleaning of the lodging accommodation; \n(c) \nfire safety standards in lodging accommodations; \n\n180 \n \n(d) \nwardrobe/locker to be of reasonable size, and \n(e) \nhealth and sanitary conditions. \n \nLIVERPOOL FOOTBALL ACADEMY– PROJECT COST& OUTCOME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/174",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 174,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/174) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Liverpool Football \nAcademy Project, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the sum \ninvested into the Academy up to December 2024, indicating the outcome derived under this \nproject for Mauritius.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nNTC – SPARE PARTS – PROCUREMENT EXERCISE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/175",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 175,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/175) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the National Transport Corporation, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to the bidding exercises \nlaunched by the Corporation for the procurement and award of contracts for spare parts since \nJanuary 2023 to date, indicating – \n(a) \nthe names of the suppliers thereof, further indicating in each case the – \n(i) \ncontractual value thereof, and  \n(ii) \namount paid to the suppliers, and  \n(b) \nif he has been aware of any irregularities and/or malpractices regarding the \nprocurement thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSSRN HOSPITAL – BABY S. – FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE \nRECOMMENDATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/176",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 176,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/176) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to Baby S. \nadmitted at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of the SSRN Hospital on 21 October 2022, she \nwill state if consideration will be given to making public the recommendations of the Fact-\nFinding Committee set up to look into this case. \n\n181",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUES – CONTAINER PARK – SPACE PROVISION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/177",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 177,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/177) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to the \ncontainer park in Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the \nmeasures being envisaged to address the problem of delivery of container due to lack of \nspace thereat, indicating if he will use his good offices to request the Mauritius Ports \nAuthority to put the site situated at the ex-slaughterhouse in the port area falling under its \npurview for the storage of containers.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nASSAULTS ON STAFF OF PUBLIC HOSPITALS – REPORTED CASES – \nREMEDIAL ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/178",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 178,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/178) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North a& Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to assaults on staff of \npublic hospitals, he will state the number of reported cases thereof on doctors, nurses and \nother non-medical staff since January 2024 to date, indicating the measures being envisaged \nto prevent such occurrences.",
      "answer": "Reply:  I wish to inform the House that since January 2024 to date, cases of assaults in \npublic hospitals were reported as follows – \n- \n3 cases (non-medical staff) at SSRN Hospital; \n- \n1 case (non-medical staff) at J. Nehru Hospital; \n- \n1 case (non-medical staff) at Mahebourg Hospital; \n- \n5 cases (2 doctors, 1 nurse and 2 non-medical staff) at New Flacq Hospital; \n- \n12 cases (10 doctors and 2 nursing staff) at Victoria Hospital, and \n- \n1 case (non-medical staff) at ENT Hospital. \nNo cases of assault were reported at Souillac, Dr. AG Jeetoo, National Cancer Centre, \nBrown Sequard Mental Health Care Centre and Subramania Bharati Eye Hospitals. \nAs regards the measures to prevent such occurrences, I wish to inform the House that \nNotices have been affixed in all public health institutions to draw the attention of the public at \nlarge to the provisions of the Public Officers Protection Act wherein fine and imprisonment \nare inflicted in cases of assault. In addition, CCTV cameras have been installed in sensible \n\n182 \n \nzones of hospitals. Furthermore, private security guards have been posted at the strategic \npoints in hospitals as a deterrent. Police officers posted at the Hospital Police Posts also \nconduct regular rounds in the Casualty and Outpatient departments at regular intervals. \nAll cases of assaults are reported to the Police Post of respective hospitals. Except for \ncases reported as precautionary measures, the police usually investigate into the cases which \nare subsequently referred to appropriate Courts of Law prior to any sentence or fine being \nadministered. \nLE BOUCHON, CARREAU ACCACIA – PIG FARM/S – RELOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/179",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 179,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/179) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the proposed relocation of pig farm/s found at Carreau Accacia, Le Bouchon, he \nwill state where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFSC/OECD REGIONAL CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE – ACHIEVEMENTS – \nFUNDING & EXPENDITURE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/180",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 180,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/180) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the \nFSC/OECD Regional Centre of Excellence, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Centre, information as to the – \n(a)  background, objectives and mandate thereof;  \n(b)  specific achievements made under each of its objectives to date;  \n(c)  annual expenditure of the Centre, and \n(d)  key performance indicators put in place to ensure that public funds are utilized \nefficiently.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nCOP30 – NDC 3.0 – CONSULTATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/181",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 181,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/181) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nEnvironment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in regard to the \nNationally Determined Contribution (NDC) 3.0 update for the forthcoming COP30, he will \nstate where matters stand, indicating – \n(a)  if consultations have been held thereon with the community at large;  \n(b)  the mechanisms and strategies for financing being put in place therefor, and  \n(c)  the outcomes of the previous NDC. \n\n183",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nSICOM LTD – PENSION FUNDS 2012-2024 – MISMANAGEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/182",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 182,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/182) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard \nto the pension funds managed by the State Insurance Company of Mauritius Ltd., she will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain therefrom information as to – \n(a)  the status of the funds from 2014 to 2024, indicating the qualifications and \nbenefits drawn by those managing same, and  \n(b)  whether any case of mismanagement has been reported in relation thereto and, if \nso, the actions taken to remedy the situation.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nNLTA – TEMPORARY PUBLIC SERVICE LICENSES – BUSES & TAXIS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/183",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 183,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/183) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the issue of temporary public \nservice licenses to buses and taxis, he will – \n(a)  for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, \ninformation as to the number of such licenses delivered from 2015 to 2024, \nindicating the procedures adopted to award these licenses, and  \n(b)  state if consideration will be given for the setting up of an inquiry to look into the \ncircumstances for the granting of these licenses.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nMONKEYS – EXPORTATION – ANNUAL REVENUE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/184",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 184,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/184) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nwhether, in regard to monkeys, he will state the number thereof exported, yearly, since 2014 \nto date, indicating the – \n(a) \naverage selling price thereof; \n(b) \nannual revenue generated yearly, since 2014 to date, and \n(c) \nshort and long run plan of the Ministry in relation to such trade.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n\n184 \n \n \nPBAT – HEADMASTER & DEPUTY HEADMASTER – APPOINTMENT CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/185",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 185,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable the Attorney-General – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Judiciary, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Master and Registrar, \ninformation as to whether any survey has been carried out \non the conditions of the existing courts infrastructure and, \nif so, indicate the actions being envisaged to address the \nissues, if any, identified?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/186",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 186,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/186) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the case referred to the \nPublic Bodies Appeal Tribunal regarding the appointment of officers to the grades of \nHeadmaster and Deputy Headmaster from 2019 to 2021 and after the final determination of \nthe Tribunal confirming their substantive appointment, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nstate if consideration will be given for the matter to be referred to the High Powered \nCommittee to look into the possibility of payments of gratuity and pension benefits for all \nthose officers who retired before the final determination of the Tribunal.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nPOSTE DE FLACQ – FLOODING ISSUES – MITIGATION ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/187",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 187,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/187) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the recurring flooding issues in Poste \nde Flacq and surrounding area and the subsequent site visit effected by Officers of the Land \nDrainage Authority on Wednesday 05 February 2025, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain information as to where matters stand as to the proposed mitigation actions plan to be \nimplemented thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nCHAMAREL/PLAINE CHAMPAGNE ROAD – REOPENING – ROAD SAFETY \nSURVEY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/188",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 188,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/188) Mr A. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the Chamarel/Plaine Champagne \nRoad recently reopened to road users on 20 February 2025, he will state if – \n(a) \na road safety survey has been effected prior its reopening and, if so, give details \nthereof, and \n(b) \nconsideration will be given for the cleaning and trimming of trees along the \nroadsides.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nDISABILITY PENSIONS – CANCELLATION  \n\n185",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/189",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 189,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/189) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \nwhether, in regard to disability pensions, he will state the number of persons whose invalid \npensions have been cancelled over the last four years, indicating the – \n(a) \nreasons therefor, and  \n(b) \nmeasures taken by his Ministry to ensure that bona fide cases are not penalised.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nGOODLANDS MEDICLINIC – OPERATING HOURS – FACILITIES & SERVICES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/190",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 190,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/190) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Goodlands Mediclinic, he will \nstate the – \n (a) operating hours thereof; \n (b) facilities available and services provided thereat, and \n (c) number of staff posted thereat, indicating their respective capacities.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nTRUST FUND FOR EXCELLENCE IN SPORTS – STUDENTS/ATHLETES \nPROGRAM SUPPORT – BENEFICIARIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/191",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 191,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/191) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the program Support to Students/Athletes \npursuing Tertiary/Vocational Studies (Locally & Abroad), he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Trust Fund for Excellence in Sports, information as to the number of \nathletes having benefitted thereunder and amount disbursed during the last five years.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nROAD SAFETY – PAVEMENTS & CYCLE TRACK PROVISION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/192",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 192,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/192) Dr. Ms Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to road safety, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether his Ministry is in \npossession of any report identifying roads in residential areas without \npavements, and \n\n186 \n \n(b) \nstate if consideration will be given to amending the relevant legislations to \nprovide for mandatory designated space for – \n(i) \nthe construction of pavements in residential areas, and \n(ii) \ncycle tracks along newly constructed roads.",
      "answer": "Reply (The Minister of National Infrastructure): With regard to part (a) of the \nquestion, I am informed by the local authorities and the Road Development Authority (RDA) \nthat there is no report as such identifying roads in residential areas without pavements.  \nFor classified roads under the purview of the RDA, I am informed that footpaths are \nusually provided on at least one side of the main road and will gradually be provided on both \nsides upon availability of adequate land and funds. Moreover, on a yearly basis, roads \npreviously under the purview of the local authorities will be gradually classified as main \nroads and these roads will be subsequently upgraded with the required road furnitures, \nincluding footpaths. \nI am informed by the local authorities that roads, especially in residential areas, vary \nbetween three metres to four metres wide. Given the narrowness of the internal roads with \nlittle or no road reserves and the fact that most of these places are already highly built up, \noften these roads do not have pavement. However, at other places, covered drains act as \npavement for pedestrians. In addition, in all new residential Morcellements, provision is \nbeing made for covered drains with concrete slabs and same are used as pavements. It is, in \nfact, a mandatory requirement from the Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit in a bid to \nensure safety of pedestrians.   \nAs regards the proposal to amend the relevant legislations to provide for mandatory \ndesignated spaces for pavements and cycle tracks, I would propose that consultative meetings \nbe held with the relevant stakeholders, namely the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of \nHousing and Lands, the Ministry of Land Transport, the Ministry of Local Government, the \nTMRSU and my Ministry with a view to devising a holistic policy thereon, bearing in mind \nsite and financial constraints. \nAs regards provision for cycle lane, it is to be noted that since August 2020, all new \nroads constructed by the RDA are being provided with a bicycle lane of a width of about 2.55 \nmetres segregated from the main road. The dedicated bicycle lanes are being implemented \nwith a view to encouraging cycling for leisure and recreation while improving the safety of \ncyclists and reducing road congestion. \n\n187 \n \nSince I assumed office, I have raised concerns on the apparent underutilisation of these \nbicycle lanes, which have been constructed at such significant costs. Upon my request, the \nRDA had carried out a survey and has confirmed that the bicycle lanes which are already \noperational are highly underutilised, though in some cases, are being used as a health track \nfor jogging purposes. The RDA has also highlighted the challenges associated with the \nexisting bicycle lanes, namely the lack of continuity to connect to built-up areas and public \nplaces as well as the difficulties to maintain and keep them free from overgrowths. \nFurthermore, in light of the rising number of accidents involving motorcycles, it is \nincreasingly felt that the traffic flow of two-wheelers/motorcycles should be segregated, as \nfar as possible, from other vehicular traffic to reduce risks of accidents. In these \ncircumstances, it is proposed to review the policy for the provision of bicycle lanes in \nconsultation with the TMRSU, the local authorities and the Police. Some tentative proposals \nare as follows – \nFor existing cycle lanes – \n(i) \npromotion campaigns would be carried out to promote usage of the cycle lanes, \nand \n(ii) \nconsideration would be given to the extension/connection of the cycle lanes to \nneighbouring residential and/or public areas. \nFor new projects – \n(iii) \nconsideration would be given to provide cycle lanes mostly in residential areas \nas well as touristic regions, which could eventually be linked with Smart Cities, \nand \n(iv) \ncycle lanes could be constructed next to the main road, instead of segregating \nsame to enable motorcycles to use the lanes as well and which could help to \nreduce traffic congestion and improve road safety. \n \nPUBLIC SERVICE EXCELLENCE AWARD – OBJECTIVES & ELIGIBILITY \nCRITERIA",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/193",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 193,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms",
      "question": "(No. B/193) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nPublic Service and Administrative Reforms whether, in regard to the Public Service \nExcellence Award, he will state the – \n(a) \nobjectives thereof; \n\n188 \n \n(b) \neligibility criteria to participate therein, and \n(c) \nscope of participation for public officers in Rodrigues.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCWA – EASTERN REGIONS – PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/194",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 194,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/194) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the pipe replacement projects in \nthe villages of Palmar, Quatre Cocos, and Belle Mare/Mare du Puits locality, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to where \nmatters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nLODGING ACCOMMODATION PERMIT – APPLICATION & DELIVERY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/195",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 195,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/195) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to Lodging \nAccommodation Permit, he will state the – \n(a) \nexpected timeframe for an inspection to be carried out upon receipt of a new \napplication therefor, and \n(b) \nnumber of permits granted in Constituency No. 6, Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or \nsince 2019 to 2024, giving details thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMOTORWAYS M1, M2 & M3 – STREET LIGHTING –  FUNCTIONALITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/196",
      "sitting_id": "18-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-18",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 196,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/196) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the street lighting \nsystem on motorways M1, M2 & M3, including the new bypass road leading to the Sir \nSeewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport, he will state if he has been made aware of \nseveral stretches where same are not functional, indicating the – \n(a) \nremedial measures being envisaged, and \n(b) \nfrequency at which checks are carried out along these roads during the night.",
      "answer": "Reply: The provision and maintenance of all street lightings found along Motorways \nM1, M2 and M3, including the new bypass road leading to the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam \nInternational Airport, fall under the purview of the local authorities and the Central Electricity \n\n189 \n \nBoard (CEB). I am informed by the Road Development Authority (RDA) that it caters for \nstreet lighting only along new road projects and same are handed over to the local authorities \nonce the projects are completed. \nI am informed by the CEB that it has a maintenance agreement for street lighting along \nMotorways M1, M2 and M3 with eight Local Authorities, namely the District Councils of \nPamplemousses, Rivière du Rempart, Moka and Grand Port and the Municipal Councils of \nPort Louis, Quatre Bornes, Vacoas-Phoenix and Curepipe which is effective for a period of \n36 months starting from 01 July 2022 and ending on 30 June 2025. \nWith regard to parts (a) and (b) of the question, I am informed by the CEB that in order \nto keep all lighting operational along the motorways, routine inspections for street lightings \nblackout are carried out by the CEB and corrective and remedial measures are accordingly \ntaken by the latter. Whenever faults occur on overhead cables and street lanterns, elevator \nlorry and Police assistance are required to carry out the repair works and same are effected \nwithin one week, subject to availability of Traffic Riders from the Traffic Branch Police. As \nregards part of motorways with heavy flow of traffic, such as in the region of Port Louis, \nEbène, Pont Fer and St Jean, repair works are carried out on Sundays only, as per requirement \nof the Traffic Branch Police. \nRegarding the new bypass road leading to the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International \nAirport, I am informed that, at the request of the District Council of Grand Port, the CEB \ncarried out repair works along the road to ensure that the street lightings are operational. It is \nnow the responsibility of the District Council of Grand Port to ensure that the system operates \nefficiently with regular inspection and maintenance works.",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/197",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 197,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/197) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \n\n26 \n \nregard to SMS PARIAZ Ltd, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Gambling \nRegulatory Authority, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of licenses issued thereto since 2015 to November 2024, and  \n(b) \nnames of the shareholder/s and/or Director/s thereof, indicating if Mr J. M. L. S. \nhas a direct or indirect interest therein.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, in the Government Programme, under the \nsubtitle “Restoring integrity in the gaming industry”, we have undertaken to restore public \nconfidence in the Gambling Regulatory Authority, particularly in regard to its oversight on \nthe horseracing industry.  \nRelevant amendments will be brought to the Act to ensure that the GRA operates as a \ntrustworthy regulator of the gaming and betting industry, in a transparent and accountable \nmanner. \nMadam Speaker, the Gambling Regulatory Act 2007 has, inter alia, the following \nobjectives – \n(i) \npromoting public confidence in the integrity of horseracing industry by ensuring \nproper standards of conduct and competence; \n(ii) \nensuring that gambling is conducted in a fair and transparent manner; \n(iii) fostering responsible gambling in order to minimise harm caused by gambling, \nand \n(iv) promoting the welfare and leisure of the race-going public. \nIt is worth reminding the House, Madam Speaker, that under the last regime, the GRA \ninstead of furthering its objectives – this is why I spelt them out – as in the Act, developed an \nincestuous relationship with some in the gambling world. The GRA became a den of \nnotorious agents at the service of their political masters. \nFrom 2015 to 2024, the GRA totally destroyed public confidence in the gambling \nindustry and the horseracing industry. In fact, it literally decimated horseracing in Mauritius. \nIt acted more as a Gambling Promoting Authority dishing out various licences in every nook \nand corner of the country. That is how the then Government, if you remember, in 2015, said \nthey want to prevent Mauritius from becoming “enn Nation zougader”. This is precisely what \nthey did. \n\n27 \n \nRegarding part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Gambling Regulatory \nAuthority, that a total number of 186 licences has been issued… \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Ça va ! Ça va ! \nThe Prime Minister: …has been issued. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Il y a de quoi être choqué ! \nMadam Speaker: I am sorry! \nThe Prime Minister: It was a mosquito! \n(Interruptions) \nI repeat, Madam Speaker… \nMadam Speaker: I am sorry, hon. Prime Minister.  \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, don’t worry!  \nMadam Speaker: It is the equipment! \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, I am sure. Like everything else in this country; everything is \nfalling apart! \nI am informed, Madam Speaker, by the Gambling Regulatory Authority, as I said, that a \ntotal number of 186 licences has been issued to SMS PARIAZ Ltd from 2015… \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Bandit ! \nThe Prime Minister: … to November 2024, and they are as follows – \n(i) \n25 Bookmaker licences for conducting fixed odds betting through remote \ncommunication by SMS;  \n(ii) \n20 Bookmaker licences for conducting fixed odds betting on football matches \ntaking place outside Mauritius, and \n(iii) 141 Limited payout machine licences.  \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, Madam Speaker, I am tabling a list of the names \nof the current shareholder and Directors of SMS PARIAZ Ltd obtained from the Gambling \nRegulatory Authority.  \n\n28 \n \nAccording to this list, Mr J.M.L.S. is neither a shareholder nor a Director of SMS \nPARIAZ Ltd.  \nI am, however, informed by the GRA that Mr J.M.L.S. was a shareholder of SMS \nPARIAZ Ltd from 22 April 2009 to 23 May 2014.  \nHe was also a Director of SMS PARIAZ Ltd from 15 January 2008 to 17 April 2009 \nand from 10 January 2013 to 18 March 2013. \nAccording to records at the Corporate and Business Registration Department, there has \nbeen successive transfer of shares from Mr J.M.L.S. to a list of persons and, eventually, in \n2014 to Mr P. T. – I am not saying the full name. \nI am informed by the GRA that at the time of application of his personal management \nlicence, Mr J.M.L.S. submitted a copy of the registered Power of Attorney in favour of Mr P. \nT. who is the sole shareholder of SMS PARIAZ Ltd at the time, and giving him Power of \nAttorney to generally act on his behalf to manage, conduct, carry on and administer all his \naffairs and properties in Mauritius and to represent and act for him in all matters. \nIt is clear, Madam Speaker, it appears at least, that it could be a case of prête-nom, and \nthis is being looked into. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Member! \nMr Jhummun: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. Madam Speaker, given that there are \nother betting shops, I will mention a few – \n(i) \nBosco; \n(ii) \nSilver Sports; \n(iii) Easy Win; \n(iv) ValuePlus; \n(v) \nPeerless; \n(vi) Toppool; \n(vii) Footy; \n(viii)  Bet Online, and \n(ix) Booksystem. \n\n29 \n \nAll these are apparently operating under the same umbrella, but sous des différents prête-\nnoms. In order to shed light on all these issues and in public interest, can the hon. Prime \nMinister undertake to establish a full-fledged inquiry in order to enquire on the empire of \nJ.M.L.S.? Thank you. \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, I could, but I must say that on 20 March 2025, SMS \nPARIAZ Ltd lodged a case at the Supreme Court against the GRA. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nAGALÉGA – AIRSTRIP CONSTRUCTION – GOVERNMENT OF MAURITIUS & \nGOVERNMENT OF INDIA AGREEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/198",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 198,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/198) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Agaléga, \nhe will state the terms and conditions of the agreement signed between the Government of \nMauritius and the Government of India for the construction of an airstrip and its amenities, \nindicating the – \n(a) \nother facilities extended thereunder; \n(b) \nduration thereof; \n(c) \nrental fee perceived, if any, and  \n(d) \nrestrictions imposed, if any, to the inhabitants thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that on 27 February \n2015, Cabinet had agreed to the signing of a MoU with the Government of India for the \nimprovement of Sea and Air Transportation Facilities at Agaléga.  \nI wish to inform the House that this MoU was signed on 11 March 2015.  Subsequently, \nfollowing a PNQ on 31 March 2015, a copy of the MoU was tabled in the House. \nMadam Speaker, the Agreement with the Government of India on infrastructural \nprojects in Agaléga was signed on 27 May 2017.  It relates to the protection and safeguarding \nof our maritime security needs in the following areas, among others –  \n(i) \na surveillance and monitoring of our vast EEZ which is of 2.3 million square \nkilometres; \n(ii) \ncounter-piracy, counter-terrorism, counter-narcotics and human trafficking; \n\n30 \n \n(iii) \ncontrolling poaching and illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing; \n(iv) \nprovision of hydrographic services; \n(v) \npromoting economic development, including blue economy initiatives; \n(vi) \nemergency response, including search and rescue; \n(vii) \nmarine protection response, and \n(viii) \nHumanitarian Assistance and Disaster relief activities. \nMadam Speaker, the new airstrip, the jetty and their associated infrastructure have been \nentirely financed and constructed by the Government of India. The Agreement provides that \nthe title to all the immovable property being constructed in Agaléga by the Government of \nIndia will remain with the Government of Mauritius. In addition, the Government of India is \nalso assisting the Government of Mauritius in the operation and maintenance of the facilities, \nand the relating costs are being borne by the Government of India.  Accordingly, technical \nexperts from the Government of India are currently operating and maintaining the facilities.  \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I would like to inform the House that the airstrip \nand associated facilities that have been constructed in Agaléga include a 3 km long and 45 m \nwide airstrip.  It also includes an Air Traffic Control Tower, a Passenger Terminal Building, \nan Aircraft Hangar, an Electrical Station, as well as a new jetty.  \nWith regard to parts (b), (c) and (d) of the question, there is a Confidentiality Clause in \nthe Agreement, similar to other Agreements that Mauritius has signed with other States. We \nare bound by this Confidentiality Clause. However, I can assure the House that the hon. \nDeputy Prime Minister and myself have looked at the Agreement and we can state that there \nis nothing that should be a matter of concern, especially in respect of the sacrosanct principles \nof sovereignty and territorial integrity. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Quirin! \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. Dois-je rappeler à la Chambre que l’actuel \nDeputy Prime Minister, de même que l’honorable Dr. Boolell, lors de ses précédents PNQs, \nalors qu’il était leader de l’opposition en 2022, le 26 juillet et en octobre 2023, les deux, avec \nraison, avaient réclamé que tout soit rendu public, qu’il n’y ait pas de clause confidentielle, \ncomme le précédent gouvernement avait, je ne dirai pas caché, mais n’avait pas voulu, à \nl’époque, aussi rendre public cette clause confidentielle ? Donc, doit-on comprendre que, \nmalgré que l’actuel Deputy Prime Minister et l’honorable Dr. Boolell, alors qu’il était leader \n\n31 \n \nde l’opposition - qu’est-ce qui peut empêcher le Premier ministre, aujourd’hui, de dévoiler à \nla Chambre – comme il vient de l’affirmer – cet accord, puisqu’il n’y a rien de \ncompromettant dans cet accord ; qu’est-ce qui l’empêche de rendre public justement cet \naccord entre l’Inde et Maurice ? \nThe Prime Minister: Not only the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister Dr. Boolell, I \nalso said that during the campaign, but there is a clause of confidentiality in the agreement. \nWe did not see the agreement at the time. There is a clause. That agreement subsumed the \nunderstanding reached in 2015 of the Memorandum of Understanding. That is the reason. \nMadam Speaker: You have another question? \nMr Quirin: J’ai une autre question, Madame la présidente, avec votre permission. \nPlusieurs médias étrangers, dont certains journaux renommés, réputés de l’Inde avaient… \nMadam Speaker: No! In this House, you are not going to talk about the media. We \nwant to know what your question is. \nMr Quirin: Ma question est la suivante : il y a une question que toute la population se \npose et même… \nMadam Speaker: Ça c’est bien! Allez-y! \nMr Quirin: …ceux qui sont concernés par ce qui se passe à Agaléga. Ils veulent savoir \ns’il n’y aurait pas une base militaire à Agaléga; est-ce que Agaléga ne serait pas utilisé, à \nl’avenir, comme une base militaire. \nMadam Speaker: ‘À l’avenir’, okay. \nThe Prime Minister: I can assure the House that it is absolutely not the case. \nMadam Speaker: Alright! Yes, hon. Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil! \nBRIGADE POUR LA PROTECTION DE LA FAMILLE – CHILD ABUSE & \nJUVENILE DELINQUENCY – EFFICIENCY & SYSTEM REVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-march-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/199",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 199,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/199) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \n\n32 \n \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \n‘Brigade pour la protection de la famille’ he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information \nas to the – \n(i) \nefficiency of the unit in dealing with cases of child abuse and juvenile \ndelinquency, and  \n(ii) \nnew measures proposed, if any, in dealing with juvenile offenders and  \n(b) \nstate if he proposes to reinstate the ‘Brigade des mineurs’ to deal with problems \nof child abuse and juvenile delinquency.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat the ‘Police Family Protection Unit’ was set up in September 1994, to attend to cases of \ndomestic violence, child abuse and child beyond control. However, over the years, with an \nincrease in the number of cases of child abuse, another unit, the ‘Brigade Pour La Protection \ndes Mineurs’ was set up in May 2004 to deal particularly with cases of child abuse and \njuvenile delinquency. Both units were operating under the aegis of the Central Criminal \nInvestigation Department. \nWith the promulgation of the Children’s Act, the Child Sex Offender Register Act and \nthe Children’s Court Act in the year 2020, the Child Protection Act of 1994 and the Juvenile \nOffenders Act of 1935 have been repealed. Consequently, the role and responsibilities of the \n‘Police Family Protection Unit’ and the ‘Brigade Pour La Protection des Mineurs’ were \nreplaced by a new unit under the appellation ‘Brigade pour la Protection de la Famille’ in \nJanuary 2022, in order to implement the provisions under the foregoing legislations. \nMoreover, the ‘Brigade pour la Protection de la Famille’ was assigned new \nresponsibilities to include the implementation of the recommendations of the National \nStrategy and Action Plan 2020-2024 on the Elimination of Gender-Based Violence and to \nwork with other relevant stakeholders, such as, the Ombudsperson for Children’s Office, \nOffice of the Director of Public Prosecutions and the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family \nWelfare, among others. \n\n33 \n \nTo ensure effective service delivery, ten sub-units of the ‘Brigade pour la Protection de \nla Famille’ have been set up by the Police in strategic locations throughout the island, \nincluding Rodrigues. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a)(i) of the question, I am informed by the \nCommissioner of Police that since the inception of the ‘Brigade pour la Protection de la \nFamille’ in January 2022, cases of child abuse are being addressed in a professional manner \nand there is proper coordination among the various stakeholders. The staff are given adequate \nlocal and overseas training to handle such cases and to fine tune their cognitive interviewing \nand investigative skills to be able to interview and record statements from victims. They have \nadopted a victim-centred approach to prevent secondary victimisation and stigmatisation. \nConcerning juvenile delinquency, such cases are dealt in two ways according to section \n41 of the Children’s Act of 2020 – \n(i) \nThe Police or the aggrieved parents may apply to the Mauritius Probation and \nAftercare Services for a ‘Parenting Support Intervention’ in order to assist the \nparents in performing their parental duties with respect to the management of \ntheir child’s behaviour. Thereafter, for this purpose, Probation Officers make an \nassessment of the child’s behaviour. If the outcome of the assessment is \nfavourable, a report is submitted to the Police. \n(ii) \nIf the outcome of the assessment is unfavourable, the report is submitted to the \nProtection Division of the Children’s Court for the issue of a ‘Preventive \nIntervention Order’ by the Magistrate, which may include, among others, \nplacement in an institution in accordance with the Probation of Offenders Act; \nattending drug or alcohol treatment or mental health counselling plan; \nparticipating in group activities, including counselling and complying with such \norder as the Magistrate may determine. \nAs regards part (a)(ii) of the question, it is envisaged to reinforce the strength of the \n‘Brigade pour la Protection de la Famille’ with additional resources to enable this unit to \nfurther meet the growing demands for their services. Neighbourhood Officers at Police \nStations will be encouraged to act as Family Liaison Officers for profiling and identifying \nchildren with deviant behaviours and for referring them to the relevant agencies for follow-up \nand counselling. During sensitisation campaign, members of the public will be encouraged to \n\n34 \n \ntip off the Police of suspected cases of child abuse and child exhibiting anti-social behaviour \nfor remedial actions. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, in view of the increasing number of complaints \nbeing received concerning the follow-up of children beyond control and domestic violence \ncases, the whole system is being reviewed. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, the hon. Fourth Member for Port Louis North and \nMontagne Longue! \nPOLICE DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT – NOISE POLLUTION & DISTURBANCES – \nREPORTED CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-march-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/200",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 200,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/200) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the increasing number of reported cases of noise pollution and disturbances, he will \nstate if he will consider using his good offices to request the Commissioner of Police to \nstrengthen the Police de l’Environnement island-wide to enhance its manpower, capacity and \neffectiveness.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the Police de l’Environnement is established \nunder section 14 of the Environment Act 2024 to provide to the Director of Environment \nsuch assistance as may be required in order to enforce the environmental law. \nThe duties and responsibilities of the Police de l’Environnement include the \nenforcement of environment-related legislations and pollution prevention, sensitisation on \nenvironmental issues, investigation into breach of environmental laws and attending to public \ncomplaints on such matters.  \nOn 01 October 2022, the following two Regulations on environment protection relating \nto noise pollution were promulgated – \n(i) \nThe Environment Protection (Environmental Standards for Noise) Regulations \n2022 which provide for three categories of noise and their respective \npermissible level, namely industrial, neighbourhood and power station. The \nprimary sources of noise nuisances include playing of loud music, machinery \n\n35 \n \nused in workshops, nightclubs and entertainment centres operating at night, \nparticularly those located in densely populated residential areas, and \n(ii) \nthe Environment Protection (Control of Noise) Regulations 2022 which, inter \nalia, enhance enforcement, facilitate prompt action, and reduce lengthy legal \nprocedures. A fixed penalty system with a fine of Rs10,000 was introduced for \nthe offence of noise pollution constituting a nuisance. \nMadam Speaker, in addition to its main office in Port Louis, the Police de \nl’Environnement has been decentralised in seven divisions across the island to enhance its \noperational effectiveness and efficiency to ensure that they work closely with the community \nin their role to protect the environment. It also operates a hotline to receive complaints. The \nunit also carries out night patrols to monitor noise and disturbances around places of \nentertainment, as I said, such as night clubs, restaurants, pubs, private clubs, and bungalows. \nPresently, the Police de l’Environnement is manned by 37 Police Officers who are \ndeployed in seven teams and has eight vehicles to cover the whole island. \nThe number of contraventions for the offence of causing noise constituting a nuisance \nhas increased significantly from 52 in 2021 to 138 in 2024. Since the beginning of this year to \ndate, 60 such contraventions have been established by the Police de l’Environnement. Since \nthe number of cases is clearly on the rise, the Police are considering strengthening their \nresources to better educate the public through awareness campaigns and for greater \nintervention on the ground. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Your next question! \nMr A. Duval: I have a supplementary. \nMadam Speaker: You have a supplementary, yes! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, the hon. Prime Minister will agree that four officers \nspread along three Police shifts; so, during one shift, one Police Officer is not nearly enough, \nespecially in regions like in the north, where we have around 12 public beaches plus night \nclubs, restaurants, etc. Therefore, will he consider firstly, like the question asked, reinforcing \nthe ranks of the Police de l'Environnement significantly so that it can work as is expected? \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I have just said that. \n\n36 \n \nMr A. Duval: I have a second question, Madam Speaker. Pending the reinforcement to \noccur, will the hon. Prime Minister ensure that more Police Stations are equipped with noise \ndetectors so that they may enforce the laws without having to wait for the Police de \nl'Environnement, for example, to issue a contravention, subject to having a noise detector \nemittance to ascertain that the person is in contravention? Will he consider equipping those \nPolice Stations immediately, pending the reinforcements? \nThe Prime Minister: This is something we could consider, but the Police de \nl'Environnement already have the equipment. \nMr A. Duval: Yes, but, Madam Speaker, … \nMadam Speaker: Yes, I understood the question. \nMr A. Duval: If I may, Madam Speaker. We have established there is only one per \nshift. Therefore, pending that it is reinforced, a simple solution now would be to equip the \nPolice Stations… \nMadam Speaker: Do not tell the hon. Prime Minister what to do! Ask him a question! \nMr A. Duval: But that is the question: whether he will consider. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister, would you like to elaborate? \nThe Prime Minister: I can’t say that I have understood the question. I thought I \nalready answered it. But, say it again, I will… \nMadam Speaker: Let me rephrase! The question, hon. Prime Minister, from what I \nthink I understand, is whether we can give this type of equipment to Police Stations, not to \nPolice de l'Environnement. Is that the question? \nThe Prime Minister: I am not sure that… \nMr A. Duval: Clearly, they are understaffed. Pending a reinforcement at the level of \nthe Police de l'Environnement and given the number of cases on the rise, will the hon. Prime \nMinister – it is an easy fix – ensure that more Police Stations are equipped with noise \ndetectors so that they can enforce the law?  \nMadam Speaker: That is what I have just said! \nThe Prime Minister: It will be for the Police de l'Environnement to go and check.  \n\n37 \n \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Chut, hon. Jhummun! \nThe Prime Minister: It is not the Police Officers in the Station who go and check; it is \nthe Police de l'Environnement. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Sa kantite tapaz de happy-hour lamem sa! \nMadam Speaker: Chut! \nLet us go to your next question!  \nMOTORCYCLES – HELMETS, MODIFIED LOUD EXHAUSTS & LICENSE \nPLATES – CRACKDOWN OPERATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-march-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/201",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 201,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/201) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to riding motorcycles without helmets, with modified loud exhausts and without \nlicense plates on public roads, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to whether consideration will be given for regular \ncrackdown exercises to be effected in relation thereto and, if so, give details thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat crackdown on motorcyclists riding without helmets or motorcycles with modified loud \nexhausts or without licence plates on public roads, are being conducted regularly. These \noperations involve the deployment of the Traffic Branch, local Police, Emergency Response \nServices and the Divisional Support Unit. The teams are reinforced by the Special Mobile \nForce (SMF) and the Special Support Unit, whenever required. An average of 300 crackdown \noperations are conducted monthly island-wide against motorcyclists.  \nI am also informed, Madam Speaker, by the Commissioner of Police that a three-\npronged strategy comprising Enforcement, Education and Multi-sector partnership has been \nput in place to address road safety issues. These include – \n(i) \nconducting targeted, visible and covert operations at road accidents hot spots; \n(ii) \nsetting up Road Safety Watch Schemes in collaboration with the local community \nto identify probable black spots and instances of reckless driving; \n\n38 \n \n(iii) conducting crackdown operations with the involvement of various units of the \nPolice Force; \n(iv) performing snap alcotest and drug test operations, and \n(v) \ncarrying out sensitisation campaigns on road safety through face-to-face forums, \nmainstream media, and social media. \nMadam Speaker, the crackdown operations and the three-pronged strategy deployed by \nthe Police are yielding results. From January 2024 to March 2025, a total of 9,142 crackdown \noperations were conducted, including 4,218 specifically targeting motorcycles. During these \noperations, the following contraventions were established – \n (i) \n1,431 for riding without helmets; \n(ii) \n1,541 for riding motorcycles with loud exhausts, and  \n(iii) 4,622 for riding motorcycles without licence plates.  \nThe situation is being carefully monitored, and if need be, legislations would be revised \nto impose higher penalties on offenders. \nMadam Speaker: We have only five minutes left. If you ask one or two questions, \nnobody else will be able to speak. \nMr A. Duval: Thank you, Madam Speaker. The figures given are concerning – \nthousands of contraventions. However, the problem persists! Will the hon. Prime Minister \nconsider the use of Safe City cameras to pinpoint the areas where there are recurrences? I can \ntell the hon. Prime Minister of many areas, close to where I live, where there are recurring… \nMadam Speaker: No! Question! Question! You can do that privately! \nMr A. Duval: …where motorcyclists are using their motorcycles without helmet, \nwithout number plates, with loud exhausts, and the Police are not effectively tracking down \non that. \nMadam Speaker: So, your question is? \nMr A. Duval: The question is whether he will use the Safe City cameras to ensure that \nthe Police are, in fact, being efficient, and not just rely on what the local Stations are saying. \nMadam Speaker: That is enough! That is enough! Safe City cameras! \n\n39 \n \nMr Jhummun: Bizin fer enn alcool test! \nThe Prime Minister: In fact, Madam Speaker, the Safe City cameras are now not \nbeing used to spy on people… \nMadam Speaker: Voilà ! \nThe Prime Minister: …but, in fact, to see things like these. And they are being used \nfor that! \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Next question! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Li pe rod filme son li! \nMadam Speaker: Hon. First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix! \nMAURITIUS’ PORT – IDLE VESSELS – COST IMPLICATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/202",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 202,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/202) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to abandoned and \nunattended vessels at the Port, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius \nPorts Authority, information as to the – \n(a)  number thereof, indicating the number which have remained thereat for over one \nyear, and  \n(b)  impact and financial costs thereof to the Authority, indicating the immediate \nmeasures being envisaged in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, as regards part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed by the Acting Director-General of the Mauritius Ports Authority that as at date, \nthere are 27 idle fishing vessels lying in the Port for more than one year. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, idle vessels do not have certificate of \nseaworthiness and insurance cover and accordingly pose serious environmental risk, \nnavigational and fire hazards as well as security threats.  \nTo discourage the long stay of fishing vessels, on 16 January of this year, the Mauritius \nPorts Authority has, under section 32(5) of the Ports Act, directed the owners, the agents or \nrepresentatives of the 19 fishing vessels, to take reasonable steps to remove the vessels and to \nsettle all accrued port charges within 15 days. Seven fishing vessels are subject to an inquiry \n\n40 \n \nby the Financial Crimes Commission for asset recovery. The remaining one fishing vessel is a \nmatter of foreign arbitration proceedings.   \nThe advice of the Attorney General’s Office is being solicited by the Mauritius Ports \nAuthority to proceed with the disposal of these idle vessels in accordance with the provisions \nof the Ports Act.   \nI am informed by the Acting Director-General of the Mauritius Ports Authority that an \namount of Rs4 million, representing parking fees due by the owners of the 27 idle vessels, is \nstill outstanding. In addition, an amount of Rs227,295 has been incurred by the Mauritius \nPorts Authority in terms of publication of notices. In case the vessels cannot be sold, an \namount of Rs5 million per vessel will have to be borne by the Mauritius Ports Authority for \ntheir disposal by demolition facilities. \nMadam Speaker, the Mauritius Ports Authority is working closely with the Ministry of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries to ensure that the measures are \nput in place to deter the presence of idle fishing vessels in the Port. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. We have two minutes left!  \nHon. Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne Longue, two minutes! \nPUBLIC BEACHES – INCIDENTS – LAW ENFORCEMENT MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/203",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 203,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/203) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to recent incidents on members of the public at public beaches, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of reported cases thereof since 11 November 2024 to date, indicating the \nnumber of – \n(i)  \ncases resulting in physical injury, including deaths;  \n(ii)  cases involving sexual abuse;  \n(iii)  incidents involving minors, and  \n(iv)  persons provisionally charged in relation thereto, and  \n(b) \nmeasures being proposed to maintain law and order on public beaches. \n\n41",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, in regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed by the Commissioner of Police that as from 11 November 2024 to 24 March 2025, \nthirty-one cases have been reported to the Police, which relate to incidents on members of the \npublic, on public beaches. \nOut of these – \n(i) \n22 resulted in physical injury, including one case of ill-treatment of child and one \ncase of death, and \n(ii) \n9 related sexual abuse cases, out of which 8 involved minors. \nI am also informed that fifteen persons have been provisionally charged and enquiries \nare ongoing. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat, in order to maintain law and order on public beaches, the Police are implementing the \nfollowing measures – \n(i) \nvisible Police presence through regular foot, bike and vehicle patrols by the \nregular Police, as well as other specialised units, namely the Emergency \nResponse Services, the National Coast Guard, the Police du Tourisme, Central \nInvestigation Department, and Anti-Drug and Smuggling Unit, particularly \nduring weekends, public holidays and busy hours on the beach; \n(ii) \nsurveillance through, again, Safe City cameras, where available, with constant \nmonitoring at the Police Main Command and Control Centre;  \n(iii) \npublic awareness campaigns by officers of the National Coast Guard, Police \ndu Tourisme and regular Police to educate beachgoers, including tourists, on \nsafety measures and reporting mechanisms, and \n(iv) \nclose collaboration with local authorities and other stakeholders, such as the \nBeach Authority, to enhance response and security of beachgoers. \nMadam Speaker, moreover, with a view to increasing surveillance along coastal \nregions, especially during the night, police presence is enhanced along these regions, \nwhereby various teams, including the Traffic Unit, the SMF (Special Mobile Force), the \nSpecial Support Unit and the local police conduct road blocks, Vehicle Check Points and \ntargeted drink/drug test operations. \n\n42 \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Time is up! Time is up!  \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker… \nMadam Speaker: No! No question! Time is up! \nHon. Members, the Table has been advised that the following PQs have been \nwithdrawn: B/207, B/208, B/209, B/210, and B/211. \nNow I call on Hon. Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien! \nCARREAU ACCACIA, LE BOUCHON – PIG FARMS – RELOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/204",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 204,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/204) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \n\n117 \n \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Port Mathurin Port \nDevelopment Master Plan, he will state where matters stand as to the implementation thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: The Mauritius Ports Authority is required under Section 5 of the Ports Act to \nprepare and periodically update a port master plan for Mauritius and Rodrigues with a view \nto formulating its policy for port development and land use. The Mauritius Ports Authority is \nresponsible for the proper implementation of such master plans. \nI am informed by the Acting Director-General of the Mauritius Ports Authority that the \nservices of HaskoningDHV Nederland B.V. were enlisted on 30 May 2023 to update the \nforecasts and recommendations contained in the Port Master Plan 2016. As part of their scope \nof services, the Consultants also reviewed the port master plan for Port Mathurin which \ntrades solely with Port Louis. \nI am informed that the consultants undertook a field visit to Rodrigues on 16 and 17 \nAugust 2023 for data collection and interactions with the then Chief Commissioner of the \nRodrigues Regional Assembly and other stakeholders. \nOn 19 August 2024, the consultants made a presentation of the main findings and \nrecommendations of the draft final port master plan study to the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly and other concerned parties in Rodrigues.  \nThe final port master plan was submitted on 07 October 2024 to the Mauritius Ports \nAuthority. \nThe Board of the Mauritius Ports Authority has, on 18 March 2025, approved the \nfindings and recommendations of the port master plan.  \nI am informed that the Mauritius Ports Authority and the Rodrigues Regional Assembly \nwill meet on 26 March 2025 to discuss the recommendations of the Report and the way \nforward. \nCOCAINE DISCOVERY – TRACTOPELLE’S ENGINE – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/205",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 205,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/205) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the 95 kgs of cocaine discovered in the engine of a tractopelle in July 2019, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to \n\n118 \n \nwhere matters stand as to the inquiry initiated thereinto, indicating the number of arrests, if \nany, effected in connection therewith to date.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that on 10 July 2019, at around \n15:30 hours, the employees of Scomat Ltd, located at Grewals Lane, Pailles, discovered three \nblack kit bags while inspecting the engine compartment of a Wheel Loader imported from \nBrazil. The black bags which were concealed near the exhaust muffler, contained suspicious \nsubstances. They informed the Service Manager, who subsequently sought the assistance of \nthe Anti-Drug and Smuggling Unit (ADSU).  \nUpon the arrival of the ADSU officers, the three bags, which were suspected to \ncontain cocaine, were handed over to them for investigation. At the ADSU Headquarters, the \nexhibits were weighed together with the wrappings. The total weight of the exhibits was 92.5 \nkilograms, with an estimated street value of Rs1.4 billion. \nThe exhibits were sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory for examination.  On 14 \nJuly 2020, the Laboratory forwarded its report to the ADSU, confirming that the exhibits \nsecured were indeed cocaine. As of 14 March 2025, statements were recorded from twenty \npersons and one person was interviewed in connection with the case but no person was \narrested. \nI am further informed that on 17 June 2022, the case file was forwarded to the Office \nof the Director of Public Prosecutions for advice and on 01 July 2022, it was referred to the \nPolice with queries. After these queries were addressed, the case file was resubmitted to the \nOffice of the Director of Public Prosecutions on 23 July 2023. On 01 August 2023, the case \nfile was returned to the Police with instructions to keep it in abeyance pending confirmation \nfrom the Financial Intelligence Unit as to whether they have any information on this matter. \nThe Financial Intelligence Unit has up to now not submitted any reply. \nOn 10 August 2021, the Wheel Loader was returned to Scomat Ltd following the \nadvice of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions.  \nThis is again another high-profile case which the previous Government allowed to \nremain unresolved for nearly five years, with no concrete progress. As I have indicated in my \nreply to the Parliamentary Question B/78 during the Sitting of 04 March 2025, my \nGovernment has enlisted the services of foreign investigating bodies to assist the Police in its \ninvestigation to elucidate high-profile cases, including this one. \nMR P. K. DEATH – INQUIRY \n\n119",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/206",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 206,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/206) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the death \nof Mr P. K. on 11 December 2020, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to where matters stand as to the inquiry initiated \nthereinto.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that on 11 December 2020 at \n09.40 hrs, Police attended a request at “La Roche qui Pleure”, Souillac and found the dead \nbody of a male person. The dead body was conveyed to New Souillac Hospital.  \n \nThe body was identified as one Pravin Kanakiah, Procurement and Supply \nOfficer/Senior Procurement and Supply Officer posted at the Government Analyst Division, \nReduit under the purview of the Ministry of Health and Wellness. He was reported missing at \nMoka Police Station on 10 December 2020. \nOn the same day, the Chief Police Medical Officer performed an autopsy on the dead \nbody and attributed death to ‘Traumatic Subarachnoid Haemorrhage’. \nOn 16 December 2020, the case was referred to Major Crime Investigation Team for an \nin-depth enquiry and during the course of the enquiry 35 persons were interviewed by the \nPolice. On 10 February 2022, the report on the investigation conducted by the Police was sent \nto the Office of Director of Public Prosecutions for advice. \nOn 26 April 2023, the Office of Director of Public Prosecutions required the District \nMagistrate of Savanne to hold an inquiry into the cause of death of Mr Pravin Kanakiah and \nthe circumstances connected with it. The Judicial Inquiry was lodged on 02 June 2023. \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Police that the matter is still being heard before \nthe District Court of Savanne. The last hearing was held yesterday, Monday, 24 March 2025, \nand the next hearing has been fixed for continuation on Wednesday, 02 April 2025. \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 9 – DRUGS & ILLICIT PRODUCTS’ SEIZURE & \nCONVICTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/207",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 207,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/207) Mr R. Beechook  (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the fight against \ndrugs in Constituency No. 9 Flacq and Bon Accueil, he will, for the benefit of the House, \n\n120 \n \nobtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the number of searches carried out \nin relation thereto in the said constituency over the past ten years, indicating the – \n(a) \namount of drugs and other illicit products seized in the course thereof and the \nvalue thereof; \n(b) \nnumber of arrests effected, and  \n(c) \nnumber of convictions secured.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPOLICE INQUIRIES – CHARGES AGAINST SUSPECTS – RESPONSIBLE \nOFFICERS RANKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/208",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 208,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/208) Mrs A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Police inquiries, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner \nof Police, information as to the rank of Police Officers responsible for the determination of \nthe section of the law under which charges are preferred against suspects, indicating if legal \nadvice is sought prior thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nGOODLANDS POLICE STATION – POLICE OFFICERS & VEHICLES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/209",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 209,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/209) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nGoodlands Police Station, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of – \n(i) \nPolice Officers posted thereat, indicating their respective rankings, and  \n(ii) \nvehicles attached thereto, and  \n(b)    measures being envisaged, if any, to increase the manpower thereat for more \neffective policing within its jurisdiction.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nMAURITIAN PASSPORT – BIOMETRIC FORMAT – CONVERSION \n\n121",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/210",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 210,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/210) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Mauritian passport, he will state if consideration will be given for the \nconversion thereof into biometric format and, if so, when and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nDEPUTY PERMANENT SECRETARIES –RECRUITMENT EXERCISE 2023",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/211",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 211,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/211) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nrecruitment exercise for the post of Deputy Permanent Secretaries, advertised in 2023, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number thereof recruited.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIUS NATIONAL ASSEMBLY – NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION – \nEXTENSION TO RODRIGUES REGIONAL ASSEMBLY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/212",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 212,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/212) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the proposed \nconstruction of a new building to house the Mauritius National Assembly under the India-\nMauritius Joint Vision for an Enhanced Strategic Partnership, he will state the – \n(a) \nsite identified, if any, therefor; \n(b) \npreliminary works carried out, if any, therefor, and \n(c) \nif consideration will be given to extending this cooperation for the construction \nof a new building to house the Rodrigues Regional Assembly.",
      "answer": "Reply: It is worth recalling that in 2015 the then Minister of Financial Services, Good \nGovernance and Institutional Reforms unveiled what the previous government described as \nthe ambitious Heritage City project which in effect was but an eccentric and ego-centric \nproject to house key government institutions including the Prime Minister’s Office and a new \nParliament building, at an estimated cost of USD800 m., that is, Rs36 billion, as per the \ncurrent conversion rate  from USD to Mauritian Rupee. \n\n122 \n \nThe project became a subject of internecine squabbles over its feasibility, financial \nviability and environmental implications. What emerged was a growing belief that the project \nwas not just mismanaged but potentially a well-thought-out scam. An amount of Rs39.7 m. \nwas paid to the firm Stree Consulting for preliminary studies.  \nIn 2016, Cabinet decided to discontinue the Heritage City project amidst concerns over \nits high costs and potential risks. \nNotwithstanding the decision taken in 2016 not to go ahead with the overambitious \nHeritage City project, the previous government, in January 2024, agreed to the \nimplementation of a new mega-project, the development of an Administrative City at Côte \nd’Or on land of an extent of about 18 arpents, which would comprise four Government \nAdministrative Buildings and a new Parliament House. This project was included in the \nPublic Sector Investment Programme 2024-2027 and was proposed to be implemented in \nphases at a total cost estimated at Rs8.5 billion, excluding the construction of the new \nParliament House. \nIn regard to the proposed new Parliament House, I am informed that the previous \ngovernment had held preliminary discussions with the Government of India on the possibility \nof financial assistance being extended to the Government of Mauritius for that project. It was \nunderstood that the Indian architect firm HCP Design, Planning and Management Pvt. Ltd. \nwould be approached for the conceptual design of the new Parliament House and working out \nthe cost estimates. On 24 September 2024, Cabinet took the decision to set up a Project \nMonitoring Committee under the chair of the Prime Minister’s Office for that purpose. \nHowever, there has been no follow up since then. \nIt is in this context that the project was included by the Indian side in the discussions \nthat led to the adoption of the Mauritius-India Joint Vision for an Enhanced Strategic \nPartnership during the recent visit of the Prime Minister of the Republic of India, on the \nunderstanding that the Government of India would provide grant assistance for the project. \nI wish to highlight that the projects identified under areas of collaboration with the \nIndian Government in the strategic partnership document, will be implemented on a priority \nbasis. The proposed New Parliament House project will be discussed anew with the Indian \nauthorities in due course. The whole concept, including the identification of a new site and \nthe proposal to include a new building to house the Rodrigues Regional Assembly, may then \nbe reviewed. \n\n123 \n \nFSC/OECD REGIONAL CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE – ACHIEVEMENTS – \nFUNDING & EXPENDITURE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/213",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 213,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries – PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS PAGE 7 of 21 Parliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "question": "(No. B/213) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the proposed relocation of pig farm/s found at Carreau Accacia, Le Bouchon, he \nwill state where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much. Madam Speaker, the question is where matters \nstand. Matters are still at a standstill. We will address them forcefully to ensure that the \nprocess is reversed. This is a problem which acute and chronic and there are many stories to \nbe told and there are many stories which remain untold.  \nLet me remind our friend that this issue of relocating pig farm at Carreau Accacia, Le \nBouchon was raised in the House in July 2016 through Parliamentary Question B/475 \naddressed to the then Minister of Agro-Industry and Food Security, by Hon. Ritish Ramful. \nIn fact, I also raised the matter at Adjournment time.  \nNow, at that time, it was stated that a potential site would be identified in the South \nwithin the next few months. Despite 10 years in power, the previous government failed to \nimplement concrete measures offering only empty promises. Nevertheless, Members of the \nHouse should rest assured that the Food and Agricultural Research and Extension Institute, \nand Rose-Belle Sugar Estate have already been requested to identify suitable site for the \nrelocation of pig farm at Carreau Accacia and Le Bouchon. \nBut this is a one-off solution being undertaken given the exceptional circumstances. All \nactions will be guided by the need to uphold public health and sustainable agricultural \npractices ensuring that any solution for the pig rearing industry remains practical and \ncompliant.  \n\n43 \n \nWe even have to seek the views of the Wastewater Management Authority, CWA and \nthere is also a call for a preliminary environment review. So, this is an issue that cannot be \ntreated lightly. This is the reason as to why a committee has been set up at the level of my \nMinistry with the relevant stakeholders to look into all the issues which I have raised relating \nto pig breeding around the island in a holistic manner. We are going to hold a meeting with \nall the stakeholders on Thursday 27. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, supplementary! \nMr Apollon: Thank you, hon. Minister. As the hon. Minister is aware there is a serious \nrisk to water pollution and I can show you some pictures just taken near the rivers … \nMadam Speaker: Nobody can see that! \nMr Apollon: Okay, especially in case of heavy rain pigs’ excretion can discharge in \nneighboring rivers. Whether he will find an appropriate place to relocate this pig farm and if \nhe intends to meet both inhabitants and the owner of the said farm? \nMadam Speaker: You can communicate the documents to the Minister.  \nYes, Minister! \nDr. Boolell: It’s one way of communication.  \nMadam Speaker: Non, mais comme cela… \nDr. Boolell: He has prime time also on television and it is right for the constituents.  \nNow, as I have stated, this is a problem which needs to be addressed forcefully in a \nmeaningful and effective manner. Hence, the relevance of this committee which is going to \nbe set up because there are many other issues. I have raised the problem of contamination of \nunderground water. This is an issue that has to be treated with all the finesse and delicacy that \nit takes. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Hon. Etwareea! \nRENEWABLE ENERGY HYBRID FACILITIES PROJECTS – COREXSOLAR \nINTERNATIONAL (MAURITIUS) LTD – POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT \n\n44",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/214",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 214,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/214) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the Renewable Energy \nHybrid Facilities projects by SPV 30MW Belle Vue 2 Ltd., and SPV 30MW Belle Vue 3 \nLtd., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Electricity Board, \ninformation as to whether they are in breach of the provisions of the Power Purchase \nAgreement signed with the Board.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, avec votre permission, je répondrai ensemble \naux questions parlementaires B/214 et B/244 car elles portent sur des sujets similaires. \nMadame présidente, j’ai été informé que la Central Electricity Board a attribué le \ncontrat pour deux centrales hybrides d’énergie renouvelable, REHF, de 30 MW en 2022 à \nCorexsolar International (Mauritius) Ltd à l’issue d’un appel d’offres international. Le 15 \nfévrier 2023, Corexsolar a signé deux contrats d’achat d’électricité avec le CEB concernant \nles deux projets REHF à savoir, Belle Vue 2 et Belle Vue 3.  \nMadame présidente, j’ai été informé par le CEB que les deux sociétés, Belle Vue 2 et \nBelle Vue 3, n’ont pas rempli les conditions préalables spécifiées dans leur PPA respectif. À \nsavoir, l’obtention de tous les permis applicables, la sécurisation des accords fonciers et de \nservitude de passage et la finalisation des accords de financement. Belle Vue 2 a obtenu son \ncertificat EDB le 23 décembre 2024 et a demandé sa licence EIA le 23 août 2024. \nConcernant Belle Vue 3, la Road Development Authority (RDA) prévoit une déviation \nqui traversera le site du projet. Le 10 mars 2025, Belle Vue 3 a soumis son plan \nd’implémentation à la RDA pour approbation. Belle Vue 3 n’a pas encore son certificat EDB.  \nMadame la présidente, en ce qui concerne la partie (b) du PQ B/244, je suis informé par \nle CEB qu’un montant total de R 58,68 millions a été payé par le promoteur à la CEB à titre \nde dommages et intérêts pour retard pour Belle Vue 2 et Belle Vue 3.  \nIl convient de rappeler que ces deux projets, Madame la présidente, ont récemment \nsuscités de vives controverses en raison de plusieurs changements d’emplacements. À ce \njour, ils n’ont toujours pas été concrétisés et comme je l’ai indiqué, un autre problème foncier \nest apparu pour ce Belle Vue 3.  \nMadame la présidente, des doutes légitimes subsistent quant aux conditions dans \nlesquelles le contrat a été attribué à Corexsolar, notamment, en raison du changement \nsuccessif de site après l’allocation du projet. À l’origine, Corexsolar, avait proposé un site \n\n45 \n \nsitué sur un terrain du groupe Terra dans le nord du pays. Par la suite, l’entreprise a proposé \nun site à Baie du Tombeau pour finalement opter pour Mare d’Australia. Ce changement, à \nplusieurs reprises du site initialement retenu, soulève des interrogations légitimes sur le \nrespect des conditions du contrat.  \nDe plus, deux avis légaux successifs émanant du même cabinet juridique sont venus \nsemer le doute. Le premier avis, concluait qui le changement du site n’était pas conforme aux \nexigences du contrat, du Power Purchase Agreement (PPA), tandis que le second affirmait le \ncontraire. Cette contradiction ne fait que renforcer la nécessité d’un examen approfondi de \nl’attribution de ce projet.  \nMadame la présidente, ma lecture de ce projet est claire. Le site initialement proposé \nfaisait partie des conditions essentielles du contrat et toutes modifications ultérieures auraient \ndû être réglementées par un cadre légal sans ambiguïté. Un autre élément préoccupant \nconcerne les permis nécessaires au projet que Corexsolar n’a pas obtenus dans le délai \nimparti. En conséquence, l’entreprise a pris du retard dans la réalisation du projet ce qui a \nimpacté sur la planification énergétique du CEB. Le CEB est compté sur une production de \n60 MW de ce projet pour son mixte énergétique.  \nOr, face à ces retards, le CEB ne peut pas attendre indéfiniment et qu’il est contraint \nd’examiner d’autres alternatives pour garantir un approvisionnement énergétique stable. Face \naux nombreuses irrégularités potentielles relevées, j’ai décidé de solliciter l’avis légal du \nState Law Office afin de déterminer si les implications juridiques entourant l’attribution de ce \ncontrat à CorexSolar ont été respectées. Cette démarche vise à clarifier plusieurs points \nessentiels. D’abord, tous les compétiteurs ont-ils bénéficié du même traitement lors des \nappels d’offres. \nLes clauses du Power Purchase Agreements, le fameux, PPAs, ont-elles été \nscrupuleusement respectées ? Les avis légaux, contradictoires, peuvent-ils être justifiés ? Et \nen dernier lieu, pour quelle raison et dans quelle cadre, le CEB a-t-il sollicité deux avis \nlégaux ? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Member. \nMr Etwareea: Madame la présidente, puisque le ministre a déjà dit qu’il y avait \nbeaucoup de controverses autour de ce contrat, est-ce que le ministre a-t-il une idée pourquoi \nle CEB est en train de s’obstiner à aller de l’avant avec ce contrat ? Je comprends maintenant \n\n46 \n \nque le ministre va chercher un avis du State Law Office mais je ne comprends pas pourquoi le \nCEB est en train de s’obstiner à vouloir aller de l’avant avec le contrat. \nMadam Speaker: Short and sweet. \nMr Assirvaden: Comment? \nMadam Speaker: Short and sweet. \nMr Assirvaden : Madame la présidente, j’ai énuméré les zones d’ombre et j’ai donné \naussi ma lecture de la situation. Je ne suis pas de formation légale. Je dirais que nous avons \npris la décision de référer ce cas au State Law office. Je peux promettre à l’honorable \nmembre qu’à la lumière des avis qu’on aura, des advices qu’on aura du State Law Office, le \ngouvernement prendra une décision très rapidement. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nMr Etwareea: Madame la présidente, est-ce que le ministre est-il au courant des \nnégociations qui seraient en cours pour la reprise de l’entreprise CorexSolar par des \ninvestisseurs étrangers? \nMadam Speaker: Êtes-vous au courant, M. le ministre ? \nMr Assirvaden : Non, je ne suis pas au courant, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Next question, hon. Second Member for Grand Baie and Poudre \nD’or. \nGOODLANDS MEDICLINIC – OPERATING HOURS – FACILITIES & SERVICES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/215",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 215,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/215) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Goodlands Mediclinic, he will \nstate the – \n (a)  \noperating hours thereof; \n (b)  \nfacilities available and services provided thereat, and \n (c)  \nnumber of staff posted thereat, indicating their respective capacities.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the Goodlands Mediclinic started its \noperation in October 2014 and offers comprehensive healthcare services to meet the \ncommunity’s needs. It serves the population of approximately 25,500 people. The clinic \nprovides medical services to patients from several localities namely; Goodlands, Bois Rouge, \n\n47 \n \nMadam Azor, Mapou, Leclezio, Mamzelle Jeanne, Petit Village, Roche-Terre Saint-Antoine \nand Triangle. \nMadam Speaker, concerning part (a) of the question, the Goodlands Mediclinic \noperates seven days a week from 08:00 a.m. to 09.00 p.m. daily including public holidays. \nThe pharmacy services also operate 08:00 a.m. to 09.00 on a daily basis.  \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, the Mediclinic provides a wide range \nof facilities and services including general consultation for common illnesses, specialist \nconsultations in fields such as internal medicine, Gynecology, Cardiology and Pediatrics and \na dedicated Non-Communicable Diseases Unit. The Non-Communicable Diseases Unit offers \nvital services like diabetes management, diabetic retinopathy screening, nutritionist services \nand tobacco cessation program. The services include maternal and child care, dental \nconsultation, family planning, vaccination programs and community health rehabilitation. \nMadam Speaker, the Mediclinic also provides specialised diagnostic and treatment \nservices such as Extreme Imaging, ECG, Ultrasonography and rapid testing for HIV, COVID \n-19 and Dengue. A fully equipped pharmacy ensures the dispensing of methadone and \nessential medications. The Mediclinic also caters for specialised care such as diabetic foot \ncare and family planning counselling to meet the specific patient’s needs. \nMadam Speaker, as regard to part (c) of the question, the staffing of the Mediclinic \ncomprises 49 staff members, including 14 medical professionals, 20 nursing staffs, 11 \nsupporting stuff and 4 general workers; all working together to provide health care services to \nthe community. \nMr Beejan: Madam,… \nMadam Speaker: Yes, one. \nMr Beejan: Will the Minister confirm whether, the Goodlands Mediclinic X-ray \nDepartment will operate in the afternoon, until it is closed to accommodate patients and what \nmeasures will be put in place to extend the services? \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, we have already got about 49 staff members there and \nwe have an acute shortage of technicians in that field but nevertheless, I will convey your \nrequest to the responsible officers to of my Ministry. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister. Hon. First Member for Port Louis South and \nPort Louis Central. \n\n48 \n \nCOVID-19 –THERMAL SCANNERS ORDERS –FUNDS DISBURSED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/216",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 216,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/216) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the procurement of \nThermal scanners during the COVID-19 Pandemic, he will state the number thereof ordered \nthrough Bo Digital, indicating the – \n (a)  \namount of funds disbursed therefor, and \n (b) \n number thereof unused to date.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the State Trading Corporation that in \nApril 2020, the then General Manager of the Corporation was requested by the Permanent \nSecretary of the Ministry of Commerce and Consumer Protection to initiate action for \npayment of 11 units of body temperature measurement thermal camera solution procured \nfrom Bo Digital Co Ltd for the total amount of Rs6,600,000 exclusive of VAT. The Board of \nState Trading Corporation approved the payment of the invoices on 3 April 2020 and \npayment was affected by the State Trading Corporation as follows – \n\u001f On 03 April 2020, an amount of Rs690,000 per one thermal camera; \n\u001f On 06 April 2020, an amount of RS 4,200,000 representing 70% of total \ninvoice amounting Rs 6 million for 10 units of thermal camera. The remaining \n30% amounting to Rs1,800,000 was paid on 25 November 2020. \nThe State Trading Corporation has also informed that upon instruction from the \nNational Task Force Committee COVID-19 chaired by the then Prime Minister, one thermal \ncamera was installed at the entrance of the Prime Minister’s for security control of visitors \nand guests whereas the other 10 units were delivered to my Ministry and hospitals and \nclinics. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (b) of the question, I am informed that all the thermal \ncameras were put to use and were installed as follows – \n(a) \nHealth Region No.1 – One unit were delivered at Dr. AG Jeetoo Hospital \nand one at the Subramania Bharati Eye Hospital at Moka. Both are out of \nuse, the one at Dr. AG Jeetoo since 2023 and the one at Moka since 2022 \nand both units are faulty. \n(b) \n Health Region No. 2 – One unit was provided at SSRN Hospital and the \nsame is out of use since 2022 and is not in working conditions. \n\n49 \n \n(c) \nHealth Region No.3 – One unit was delivered to Dr. Bruno Cheong \nHospital. However, the unit is not being used following the relocation of \nservices from Dr. Bruno Cheong Hospital to the New Flacq Hospital. \n(d) \nHealth Region No.4 – Three units were installed namely at Jawaharlal \nNehru Hospital, New Souillac Hospital and L’Escalier Mediclinic. The one \nat Souillac Hospital is out of order since 2022, the other two units are in \ngood working order but not in use actually. \n(e) \nHealth Region No. 5 – One unit of thermal camera was installed at the \nentrance of Accident and Emergency Department of the Victoria Hospital. \nThe thermal camera is in good working condition but actually not in use. \nRegarding the Emmanuel Anquetil Building, I am also informed that one unit was \nplaced at the ground floor of the building from a headquarters office of the Ministry of Health \nand Wellness and it was operational at that time. Parliament of Mauritius – I mean from the \nMinistry of Commerce and Consumer Protection that one unit was based at the National \nAssembly and it is in good working conditions and is fully operational. \nMadam Speaker, I am requesting the Acting Senior Chief Executive of my Ministry to \ncarry out an enquiry into the matter, to find out any shortcomings and any measures to be \ntaken so that the thermal cameras may be operational again, particularly at a time when there \nis a threat of Chikungunya’s outbreak. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, one question. \nDr. Aumeer: 6.6 million has been disbursed for the purchase of thermal cameras and \nwe have heard that so many of them are either not in working condition… \nMadam Speaker: Question please! \nDr. Aumeer: May I ask the hon. Minister whether these equipment were purchased at \nmarket value or at extremely high prices so that the beneficiaries could enjoy a bumper crop \nat the time? \nMadam Speaker: This is an answer. \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I find in the quotation sheet that ‘approved for \ninstallation, approved on instruction from the National Taskforce chaired by the Prime \nMinister for installation.’ So, I get the feeling that there were no procedures involved. It was \nthe Task Force Committee which took the decision and it was chaired by the Prime Minister. \n\n50 \n \nHence, I am not in a position to say on the question of pricing, but it was from instructions \nthat came from above. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Dr. Ms Daureeawo! Last question! \nICTA – BARRISTER SERVICES – FEES PAID (2015-2024)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/217",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 217,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation – PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS PAGE 8 of 21 Parliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "question": "(No. B/217) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation \nwhether, in regard to the Information and Communication Technologies Authority, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom information as to the number of barristers \nwhose services were retained thereat since January 2015 to November 2024, indicating in \neach case, the – \n(a) \nnumber of cases assigned, and  \n(b) \nlegal fees paid thereto.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Information and \nCommunication Technologies Authority that for the period January 2015 to November 2024, \nthe services of 49 barristers were retained by the authority.  \nMadam Speaker, while preparing the response to this question, answers revealed that \nthere was a similar questioned asked by hon. Ms Joanna Bérenger on 29 November 2022. \nThe question pertained to the names of the legal people and the cases to which the names \nwere related. In reply, the then Prime Minister to both parts of the questions, said that the \nanswers are being placed in the Library of the National Assembly. Hence, to a certain extent, \ndenying transparency to the public.  \nFurther research revealed that there was an attorney, Mrs S.S.O., who actually earned, \nin a period of 12 months, Rs2.8 m. I can tell you the name of the company – a company by \nthe name of Ribot Chambers. They bagged Rs6.72 m. in 12 months! Now, we know the \nreason for which the then Prime Minister did not actually voice out the answer, but chose to \ngo file the document in the Library of the National Assembly.  \nAn hon. Member: Par linposs! \nDr. Ramtohul: Par linposs once again! \nComing back to the actual answer of today’s question at hand, with regard to part (a) of \nthe question, there was a total of 39 cases that were assigned to barristers. As to part (b) of the \n\n51 \n \nquestion, the legal fees amounted to Rs63.84 m. for ten years. That shows how public funds \nhave squandered.  \nHowever, there were some names that came with insistence, Madam Speaker. There is \nMr S. T… \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, we have to listen!  \nDr. Ramtohul: With your permission, can I give the names, Madam Speaker? \nMadam Speaker: Of course!  \n(Interruptions) \nBut we will have to listen! \nHon. Members: Yes! \nDr.  Ramtohul: Right! Just give me one second, I will come to this. \nMadam Speaker: These are facts, hon. Minister? Hon. Minister, these are facts? \nDr. Ramtohul: These are facts, they are! So, there was the name of a barrister \nTrilochun who bagged Rs22.18 m. out of 26 cases. \nMs Anquetil: Jackpot! \nDr.  Ramtohul: That is a jackpot! \nAn hon. Member: Ena bez la! \nMadam Speaker: No, do not use… \nDr.  Ramtohul: Ribot Chambers, for seven cases, bagged Rs12.37 m. Again, the name \nof Mrs S.S.O., that is, Mrs Sonah-Ori, comes again. Incidentally or interestingly, in IT terms, \nS.S.O. means Single Sign-On.  \nAn hon. Member: She is multiple sign-on! \nDr. Ramtohul: For 42 cases, Rs7.6 m. in the last 10 years. Now, to me, this is \nunacceptable! We see there was a really reason then for which the Legal Director of the ICTA \nwas not recruited. This position was left open for ten years so that space could be made for \nsuch services of the cronies of the MSM Government, Madam Speaker. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. We finish in one minute! \n\n52 \n \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Can Dr. the hon. Minister inform the House what is being done to \ncurtail such bad practices, and ultimately, avoid wastage of our public funds? \nDr. Ramtohul: Sure. So, I am tabling the details of the response.  \nWith regard to the supplementary question, I would like to add that this Government \ntakes good governance very seriously. The ICTA has already advertised for the position of the \nLegal Director and the applications have now been closed for the board to consider. Thank \nyou. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, one question on this side! \nMr Seeburn: Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: He caught my eye! \nMr Seeburn: Being given that large amounts of money have been paid, which is a \nmatter of public concern, would the hon. Minister consider, in public interest, to disclose the \nnames of those beneficiaries and the amount that has been paid? \nMadam Speaker: He will table the answer. He said he will table the full answer. \nDr. Ramtohul: What has been tabled actually pertains strictly to the question asked. \nBut with regard to the supplementary question, I will table additional information, Madam \nSpeaker. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much. I suspend the Sitting for one and half hour! \nBon appétit! \nAt 1.04 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.36 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Please be seated!  \nHon. Members, the Table has been advised that PQs B/226 and B/233 have been \nwithdrawn. \nHon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac ! \nMONKEYS – EXPORTATION – PERIOD 2014-2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/218",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 218,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/218) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \n\n53 \n \nwhether, in regard to monkeys, he will state the number thereof exported, yearly, since 2014 \nto date, indicating the – \n(a) \naverage selling price thereof;  \n(b) \nannual revenue generated yearly, since 2014 to date, and  \n(c) \nshort and long run plan of the Ministry in relation to such trade.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that in the year 2014, a total of \n8,809 monkeys were exported as compared to 13,484 monkeys in the year 2024. The average \nselling price per monkey in the year 2014 was USD 2235.60, that is, Rs101,130 as compared \nto USD 6424.53, that is, around Rs290,621 in the year 2024.  \nAs regard to part (b) of the question, the annual revenue generated in the year 2014 was \nalmost USD20 million, approximately Rs1 billion as compared to USD86,628 million, which \nis almost Rs4 billion in the year 2024. I am tabling information pertaining to the remaining \nyears.  \nFor each monkey exported, the long-tailed macaque, a levy of USD200, equivalent to \nRs9,035 is charged and used for conservation initiatives across the country. The amount is \nrelatively low and I shall be reviewing this amount. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, everyone in the House will conquer that the issue of long-\ntailed macaques has prompted heated debates. There are indeed a number of valid, legitimate, \nsensitive but conflicting interests which are at stake. For a sizable number of animal lovers \nand militants in favour of the welfare of animals, the trading of long-tailed macaques should \nstop.  \nUnder international law, exportation of monkeys is lawful and is regulated by the \nConvention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, whereby \nmonkeys breeding companies are issued a CITES export permit for all consignments being \nexported. From a biodiversity perspective, long-tailed macaques are an invasive species \nwhich has been negatively impacting the local, native, endemic and endangered biodiversity. \nFrom an anthropocentric angle, these long-tailed macaques constitute a danger to our \nagricultural farms and sometimes to the safety of citizens. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, there is no short or long-term policy to date. In this context, a \ncommittee is being set up with all concerned stakeholders, including, inter alia, Ministries, \nacademia, NGOs, and the private sector to look into all the aspects pertaining to the \n\n54 \n \nexportation of monkeys. Any decision on the matter will be taken collectively with concerned \nstakeholders, subject to the agreement of Government acting in public interest. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, hon. Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil! \nPALMAR, QUATRE COCOS & BELLE MARE/MARE DU PUITS LOCALITY – \nPIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/219",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 219,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/219) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the pipe replacement projects in \nthe villages of Palmar, Quatre Cocos, and Belle Mare/Mare du Puits locality, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to where \nmatters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: M. le président, j’ai été informé par la Central Water Authority, que la \nmise en œuvre des projets de remplacement des tuyaux proposés dans les villages des Palmar, \nQuatre Cocos, Belle Mare, Mare du Puits a rencontré plusieurs défis. L’appel d’offres lancé \npar la Central Water Authority pour le renouvellement des tuyaux dans la région de Quatre \nCocos a dû être annulé trois fois en raison d’offres non conformes à deux reprises, et d’un \nprix d’offres élevé à la troisième occasion. \nM. le président, je suis en outre informé par la Central Water Authority que le contrat \npour le renouvellement de 1.5 km de tuyaux existants dans le village de Palmar a été attribué \nà Great Standard Solution Ltd pour la somme de R 8 500 000, le 31 mai 2024. De la même \nmanière, un autre contrat pour le nouvellement de 1.5 km de tuyaux à Mare du Puits, Quatre \nCocos, le contrat a été attribué à Solcon Ltd pour un montant de R 9,9 millions le 18 \nseptembre 2024. Les deux projets n’ont pas pu être mis en œuvre, la CWA, comme je l’ai dit \nla semaine dernière, n’ayant pas respecté les dispositions de la loi sur le marché public en \nattribuant des contrats dont les montants dépassaient la valeur approuvée dans le projet. En \nbref, les deux contrats ont été attribués alors que les fonds n’étaient pas disponibles. \nM. le président, comme je viens de le dire la semaine dernière lors de notre session du \n18 mars, des irrégularités ont été constatées dans la mise en œuvre des projets de \nremplacement de tuyaux au niveau de la CWA. Dans le budget 2024-2025, le montant \napprouvé pour le projet – petit projet jusqu’à trois kilomètres – qui implique le remplacement \nde tuyaux d’une longueur de 1 à 3 km s’élève à R 1 milliard, le projet de la valeur de R 1 \nmilliard, réparti sur trois exercices financiers. Entre 2023 et 2024, la CWA a attribué des \ncontrats de remplacement de tuyaux à des petites et moyennes entreprises pour un montant \n\n55 \n \nsupérieur à R 1 milliard. Comme je le disais, des contrats l’année dernière, à la veille des \nélections, distribués ici et là, ce qui est contraire au principe de marché public. En règle \ngénérale, les contrats ne devraient être attribués que lorsque les fonds sont disponibles. \nM. le président, je suis informé que la valeur du projet a augmenté dorénavant de – \ncomme je l’ai dit – R 1.595 milliard, donc R 595 millions en dépassement. Mon ministère \ndevra désormais d’adresser au ministère des Finances pour demander une augmentation de la \nvaleur du projet, et solliciter l’approbation du gouvernement sur la valeur révisée du projet de \nR 1.5 milliard à peu près, conformément aux procédures en vigueur pour le projet \nd’investissement. Ce n’est qu’à ce moment que la CWA pourra procéder à la mise en œuvre \nd’autres projets de remplacement de tuyaux par des entrepreneurs de petite et moyenne taille, \ny compris les deux mentionnés par l’honorable député. \n The Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member. \nMr Beechook: M. le président, puis-je demander à M. le ministre dans la mesure du \npossible d’accélérer ce projet parce que les gens qui habitent ces régions sont obligés de boire \nde l’eau des tuyaux qui sont infestés d’amiante ? Donc c’est une question sanitaire ; voilà, si \nvous pouvez prendre cela en considération. \nMr Assirvaden: Bien sûr, M. le président. Nous avons déjà fait une demande auprès du \nministère des Finances pour augmenter ce plafond-là. Mais, vous savez avec la CWA, il \nfaudra avoir pas deux yeux, mais quatre yeux pour surveiller ces gens-là, mais je n’y \nmanquerai pas de voir cela. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nMAURITIUS FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION – ELECTIVE GENERAL ASSEMBLY – 27 \nNOVEMBER 2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/220",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 220,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/220) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Mauritius Football Association, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom information as to – \n(a) \nwhether all procedures were followed regarding the Elective General Assembly \nthereof held on 27 November 2024, indicating the – \n(i) \nnames of the candidates standing for the position of President of the \nAssociation, and  \n\n56 \n \n(ii) \nreasons why the candidature of Mr E. R. for the said position was rejected \nand  \n(b) \nthe composition of the newly elected managing committee.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, at the very outset, I wish to inform the \nHouse that the situation at the Mauritius Football Association was one of the most pressing \nissues that demanded my immediate attention upon assuming office. I was deeply concerned \nby the reports circulating in the Press and felt it was imperative to address the matter without \ndelay. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the situation, I promptly requested a full \nand detailed brief on the issue, particularly whether the elections could be held.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is important to distinguish between the election that was \nheld at the Mauritius Football Association and the eligibility of Mr S.S. to stand as candidate. \nThese are two separate issues. One does not preclude the other. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, subsequently, my Ministry obtained a copy of the Court ruling \non the case of Mr S.S. through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Thereafter, the advice of the \nAttorney General’s Office was sought and the latter indicated that Mr S.S. could be \nconsidered as eligible to stand as candidate to the National Managing Committee of the \nMauritius Football Association. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the \nMauritius Football Association that all procedures were followed as per the statutes and rules \nof the Mauritius Football Association Electoral Code. In fact, in the process leading to the \nelection held on 27 November 2024, I am informed that the Mauritius Football Association \nmust adhere to strict and well-established procedures, specifically the MFA was required to \npublish a notice of the election in newspapers, which was duly done on 12 October 2024 in le \nDéfi Plus daily. Additionally, the Mauritius Football Association was obligated to issue a \nfurther notice ten days prior to the elections, confirming that the election would proceed as \nscheduled together with the official list of candidates. This requirement was also fulfilled in \nDéfi Plus of 16 November 2024. \nThe election was conducted under the supervision of representatives from FIFA and the \nAfrican Football Confederation and at the local level, Mr D.M., a retired Superintendent of \nPolice was entrusted with the responsibility of overseeing the electoral process.  \nWith regard to part (a)(i) of the question, I am further informed that only two \nindividuals submitted their candidacies for the position of President: Mr S.S. and Mr E.R. \n\n57 \n \nAs for part (a) (ii) of the question, I am also informed that in accordance with the \nstatutes of the Mauritius Football Association, any candidate for the position of President, \nmust be supported by at least five members. Unfortunately, Mr E.R. was unable to secure the \nrequired level of support whereas Mr S.S. successfully met this criterion.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, concerning part (b) of the question, I am tabling, with your \npermission, the composition of the current Managing Committee of the Mauritius Football \nAssociation for the information of the House.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that while I am fully prepared to \nreport on matters pertaining to sports federations in relation to their obligations under the \nSports Act 2016, it will not be appropriate to report on their internal affairs as such. Sports \nfederations are autonomous entities similar to many other associations that receive various \nformal support from the Government. As such, I can only report on issues pertaining to the \nfederation that falls under the purview of the Sports Act 2016. \nIn the meantime, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to highlight that the Sports Act \n2016 provides comprehensive provisions for any individual who feels aggrieved by the action \nor omission of a sports federation. The Sports Arbitration Tribunal, an independent body \nestablished under the law, is specifically tasked with addressing such matters. Therefore, any \naggrieved parties have the right to refer their concern to the Sports Arbitration Tribunal for \nappropriate redress. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry will not walk away from its responsibility of \nbringing order to the catastrophic situation which I inherited in the sports sector. We will \nbring order to this disorder. We are already working on the introduction in the National \nAssembly of a new Sports Bill that will address many of the seemingly unresolvable \nproblems. \nI wish to conclude by stating that I will not condone any form of malpractice from any \nnational sports federation which may jeopardise the interest of the sports community.  \nThank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Quirin! \n\n58 \n \nMr Quirin: Merci, M. le président. Permettez-moi, tout d’abord, de dire que je suis en \ntotale désaccord avec ce que vient d’affirmer l’honorable ministre… \n The Deputy Speaker: Put your question! \nMr Quirin: …par rapport aux procédures suivies lors des dernières élections. M. le \nprésident, ma question est : comment le ministre peut-il justifier la candidature de Monsieur \nS. S., qui a était condamné à un an de prison avec sursis et une amende de 900 000 ariarys \npour violence physique, psychologique et morale à l’encontre de son épouse, alors que la \nSports Act 2016, la loi suprême du pays en matière de sports, est claire là-dessus ? Et je cite, \nrapidement, la section 9 (5) (c) – \n“(5)  \nNo person shall be eligible for election as a member of a Managing \nCommittee of a National Sports Federation where – \n(c) he has been sentenced to imprisonment by a Court for an offence;” \nDonc, comment une personne condamnée peut être candidat à une élection fédérale ? Et \nje vais déposer, M. le président, une copie de l’acte de condamnation de Monsieur S.S., \naccompagnée d’une copie de la section du Sports Act que je viens de citer. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Is it a certified copy of the judgement? \nMr Quirin: Bien sûr. \nThe Deputy Speaker: I am asking if it is a certified copy. \nMr Quirin: Vous pouvez jeter un coup d’œil si vous le voulez.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Minister! \nMr Nagalingum: The view of the Attorney General’s Office in respect of the election \nis as follows: “Since section 9(5) (c) of the Sports Act simply refers to a term of \nimprisonment and is silent regarding, for example, a suspended sentence, peine \nd’emprisonnement avec sursis, a sentence whose execution is suspended pending appeal, etc., \nan interpretation of section 9 (5) could be that it was intended to apply to a person who is \nactually made to serve a sentence as imprisonment.’  \n\n59 \n \nHence, on the basis of the above, it may be said that Mr S.S could be considered as \neligible to stand as candidate, as the State Law Office stated.” \nMr Quirin: M. le président, je suis totalement, encore une fois, en désaccord. En plus \nde la Sports Act qui a été transgressée avec l’accord de l’honorable ministre lui-même, il y a \négalement le questionnaire for integrity checks de la MFA qui stipule à la section 1 (4) (a), et \nje cite rapidement – \n“An integrity check shall be deemed as not passed if the candidate concerned has been \nsubject to criminal conviction or disciplinary sanctions by a State court, in particular, if \nthe underlying behaviour was a substantive issue and not a minor infraction or \nprocedural behaviour.” \nAvec cela, ce qui fait que la transgression de la loi du pays, il y a aussi des règlements \ninternes de la MFA. M. le président, est-ce que l’honorable ministre ne considère-t-il pas que \nMonsieur S.S., après que j’ai énuméré tout ce qu’il y a contre Monsieur S.S., qu’il n’était pas \nqualifié pour être candidat à cette élection et de surcroît assumer la présidence ?  \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Hon. Member, the…. \nMr Nagalingum: The question has already been answered, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Please, sit down! The hon. Minister has stated that he is going \naccording to legal advice and he has acted on legal advice submitted to him. So, we cannot, in \nthis House, challenge a legal advice. So, I take it that the answer has already been forwarded \nto you. \nMr Quirin: My last question… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, but we cannot challenge the legal advice upon which the \nhon. Minister is acting. \nMr Quirin: D’accord, je vous comprends. Donc, pour clore sur ce dossier, M. le \nprésident, le ministre a parlé des conseils qu’il a pris, qu’il aurait reçus avec la State Law \nOffice ou le Bureau de l’Attorney General. Peut-il, donc, déposer une copie des échanges \nqu’il y a eu entre son ministère et la SLO et le Bureau de l’Attorney General, incluant la… \nMr Nagalingum: Of course, I am prepared to lay any document related to that issue. \n\n60 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: The document between a lawyer and the institution is a \nprivileged document which cannot be laid on the Table of the Assembly. It is a privileged \ndocument between the client and the Attorney. \nMr Nagalingum: I am guided by what the Deputy Speaker said. \nMr Quirin: Sauvé par  M. le président ! Merci. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Sorry, what did you say? \nMr Quirin: Sauvé par M. le président ! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay. Be careful! \nThe hon. First Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES – POOR NETWORK COVERAGE – IMPROVEMENT MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/221",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 221,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation – PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS PAGE 9 of 21 Parliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "question": "(No. B/221) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nInformation Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in regard to the current \npoor mobile and internet network coverage in Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to the measures being envisaged to improve same, giving \ndetails thereof and the expected start and completion dates thereof.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Information and \nCommunication Technologies Authority that two mobile operators, namely Cellplus Mobile \nCommunications Ltd, a subsidiary of Mauritius Telecom, and Emtel Ltd operate networks in \nRodrigues and provide mobile network internet services. \nAs at date, Cellplus Mobile Communications Ltd and Emtel Ltd have 23 and 16 base \nstations, respectively and have deployed 5G, offering a maximum download speed of above \n100 Megabytes per second in Rodrigues. Moreover, both Mauritius Telecom and Emtel \nprovide home broadband internet services.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards the quality of the internet in Rodrigues, I am \ninformed that ICTA carried out, between 30 June 2024 and 06 July 2024, an assessment \nexercise of the broadband to test the quality of service. The tests were conducted principally \n\n61 \n \non the 4G mobile networks that were deployed by both the operators and this covered 92 \nlocations. Actually, those 92 locations cover a majority of the inhabited regions of Rodrigues.  \nAlthough the assessment exercise concluded that the mobile internet coverage was \nsatisfactory across majority of the areas in Rodrigues, several regions such as Songes, \nRoseaux, Rivière Banane, Pointe du Diable and Rivière Pistache still suffer from poor \ncoverage and that is due to the topography of Rodrigues, which is a challenge actually to \nensure a maximum coverage. Therefore, Emtel has informed that two new mobile sites will \nbe implemented during the course of 2025, namely at Mangues and Rivière Banane. \nHowever, the long delays in securing clearance from the authorities in Rodrigues are \nhampering the setting up of additional sites at the moment. As far as connectivity by Cellplus \nMobile Communications Ltd is concerned, a major network upgrade was undertaken in 2024, \nin order to enhance 4G services across all the existing sites and for the deployment of 5G \nnetwork on all the sites. As part of its 25-26 expansion strategy, Cellplus is planning the \ndeployment of new sites and the regions that would be covered are as follows – \n\u001f \nBaladirou Technopark; \n\u001f \nPort Mathurin – This will be done by September 2025; \n\u001f \nMon Plaisir and Grande Montagne, which will be done by November 2025, and  \n\u001f \nL’Union which is due February 2025, which just passed and that should have \nbeen covered. \nCellplus Mobile Communications Ltd has requested assistance from local authorities in \nRodrigues for facilitation of space and permits that are needed for the installation of \ninfrastructure and locations that are aforementioned.  \nCellplus has also informed that replacement and service restoration are undergoing and \nthis is being done at Mont Lubin and are expected to be completed by May 2025. \nFinally, ICTA is currently implementing a quality service measurement platform that \nwill allow any subscriber to test its internet service subscription and to communicate the \nresults through an app deployed by the ICTA itself. In this respect, the ICTA will continue \nconducting regular quality of service measurement, campaigns in Mauritius and Rodrigues \ntoo and will publish comparative performance of different broadband internet service \nproviders.  \n\n62 \n \nIt is believed that this measure will empower consumers to make informed choice of \nservices and service providers and will motivate the internet service providers to improve \ntheir quality of service in the interest of subscribers. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes. hon. François! \nMr François: Just one supplementary. I thank the hon. Minister for his extensive \nanswer. May I ask the hon. Minister whether he is aware that in 2023, there were two major \ntechnical equipment failures at the level of Mauritius Telecom in Rodrigues, causing \ndisruptions of services thereat. May I know from him whether there is any backup plan or \nredundancy plan for Rodrigues if any failures arise again in the future? \nDr. Ramtohul: So, because the question was focused on the quality of service \ncurrently, not on the redundancy of service, the answer focused on the quality of service.  \nWith regard to the redundancy of service, I will revert at a later stage. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien! \nLIVERPOOL FOOTBALL ACADEMY PROJECT – FUNDS INVESTED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-march-2025",
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/222",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 222,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/222) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Liverpool Football Academy \nProject, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the amount of funds \ninvested into the academy as at December 2024, indicating the outcome derived under this \nproject for Mauritius.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that as at December 2024, a \nsum of Rs154,789,022 has been disbursed by the Ministry for the operation management and \npayment of the annual license fee in respect of the Liverpool Club International Academy. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Mauritius Multisports Infrastructure \nLtd., a state-owned private company that has been entrusted with the responsibility for \nhosting the Liverpool Club International Academy, that since its inception in 2019, the latter \nhas produced the following results – \n1. \nThe enrolment of 650 trainees, out of which, 75 are playing in national leagues; \n2. \n38 persons of the under 20 COSAFA Men’s Team were Liverpool Club \nInternational Academy Trainee; \n\n63 \n \n3. \n50 persons under 17 Boys’ Team were Liverpool Football Club International \nAcademy Trainees; \n4. \n20 persons under 17 Girls’ Team were Liverpool Football Club International \nAcademy Trainees, and \n5. \n24 Mauritian coaches have successfully completed the Liverpool Club \nInternational Coach Accreditation Course. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes! \nMr Apollon: I was hoping that one day we will see a Mauritian player at Anfield, but I \ndo not think so. Will the hon. Minister state to the House when the contract was signed, the \nduration of the contract and if this contract will be reconsidered? \nMr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the contract was signed in June 2019 \nbetween Mauritius Multisports Infrastructure Ltd. and Liverpool Football Club and Athletic \nGrounds Ltd. The contract is due to expire on 31 May 2025. So, Government has decided that \nthe existing agreement between Mauritius Multisports Infrastructure Ltd. and Liverpool \nFootball Club and Athletic Grounds Ltd. will not be renewed upon its expiry.  \nThe Mauritius Multisports Infrastructure Ltd. has been requested to work on winding \nup procedures and arrangements. The Ministry of Youth and Sports is presently working on \nsuitable alternatives that will replace the Liverpool Football Club International Academy. \n The Deputy Speaker: Okay! Hon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose \nBelle! \nFLACQ-MAHEBOURG B28 ROAD – RESURFACING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/223",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 223,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/223) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the pipe laying projects \ncurrently being undertaken along the coastal road of Vieux Grand Port, Bois des Amourettes, \nBambous Virieux, Quatre Soeurs and Deux frères by the Central Water Authority, he will \nstate if provision will be made in the forthcoming budget for the resurfacing of the road \nwhich is in a deplorable condition.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Flacq-Mahebourg B28 Road is a classified \nroad that links several coastal villages, such as Vieux Grand Port, Bois des Amourettes, \nBambous Virieux, Quatre Soeurs and Deux Frères.  \n\n64 \n \nI am informed by the Central Water Authority that with a view to providing adequate \nwater supply to the inhabitants of these coastal villages, it has embarked on a project for the \nrenewal of the pipelines along the B28 Road with the objective of addressing the long-\nstanding issues of low water pressure, water leakages and pipes burst due to aging \ninfrastructure. The pipeline renewal project is being undertaken in two phases, namely – \n\u001f \nPhase 1: from Anse Jonchée to Bambous Virieux to Petit Sable, covering a \ndistance of 6.4 km, and \n\u001f \nPhase 2: from Ferney to Anse Jonchée, covering a distance of 6.7 km. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in line with the provisions of the Road Act, the CWA made \napplication for wayleaves to the RDA for implementing the pipe laying works. Wayleave for \nPhase 1 was granted on two occasions, namely on 19 June and 18 July 2024 for the stretch \nfrom Anse Jonchée to Bambous Virieux to Petit Sables. For Phase 2, wayleave was granted \non 26 September 2024 from Ferney to Anse Jonchée. \nThe wayleaves were subject to strict compliance with the RDA Wayleaves Conditions \nfor laying of pipes, ducts and cables. In fact, the CWA and its contractors have to ensure that \nworks are executed with minimum disruption and inconvenience to road users. \nIn addition, any damage caused to the road infrastructure shall be made good at their \nown cost. These conditions include, inter alia, the following – \n1. \nTemporary reinstatement of all trenches along the classified roads using crusher \nrun and a 30 mm layer of asphalting concrete as per specifications; \n2. \nAfter completion of the permanent works for the stretch from Ferney to Bambous \nVirieux, half width of the existing road should be milled and resurfaced, and from \nBambous Virieux to Petit Sable, the whole width of the existing road should be \nmilled and resurfaced, and \n3. \nThe works should be properly delineated with appropriate fluorescent bands. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, despite these measures, the RDA has raised concerns regarding \nthe poor conditions of the temporary trench reinstatement along the B28 Road. Several \ninspections have revealed that the reinstatement works were not up to the standard of the \nRDA wherein the presence of dangerous pits, crusher run having washed away or exposed to \n\n65 \n \ntraffic were observed, therefore, representing a serious threat to the safety of road users as \nwell as the public at large. \nAccordingly, the RDA has issued several notices to the CWA; a recent one on 18 \nMarch 2025, requesting it to take immediate remedial action. Failure to comply with these \nconditions may result in the forfeiture of the Rs20 m. bank guarantee provided by the CWA \nfor these works.  \nAs regards the villages of Quatre-Soeurs and Deux-Frères, no request for wayleave was \nreceived by the RDA for pipeline renewal works. I am informed that the existing water \npipeline which is an old one is subject to recurrent bursts and leakages resulting in the \nasphaltic wearing course thereat to be damaged. The RDA has consequently requested the \nCWA to consider permanent pipe laying works at the earliest. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed by the CWA that all works including \nroad reinstatement for the Phase I project will be completed in this financial year and those \nfor Phase II will be completed in the next financial year. \nAdditionally, a separate contract is currently being prepared by the CWA to appoint a \ngrade A contractor for the permanent road reinstatement from Ferney to Petit Sable. Same is \nexpected to be launched under the Open National Bidding by April 2025.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil! \nSUPPORT PROGRAM TO STUDENTS/ATHLETES – BENEFICIARIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/224",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 224,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/224) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the program Support to Students/Athletes \npursuing Tertiary/Vocational Studies (Locally & Abroad), he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Trust Fund for Excellence in Sports, information as to the number of \nathletes having benefitted thereunder and amount of funds disbursed in relation thereto over \nthe past five years.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Trust Fund for Excellence in Sports was \nset up under the Finance and Audit (Trust Fund for Excellence in Sports) Regulations 2002. \nIts mission is to design, finance and implement projects and schemes for the benefit of, first, \nsportsmen and sportswomen who have achieved excellence in their respective field at \nnational and international level, young athletes who have achieved excellence in their \n\n66 \n \nrespective field at school level, and retired sportsmen and sportswomen who need support \nand financial assistance in order to embark on other professional activities.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Trust Fund for Excellence in Sports that \nin pursuant of the aforementioned mission, it has established a programme to support \nstudents-athletes who are perusing tertiary/vocational studies, locally & abroad. In this \ncontext, the Trust Fund has supported, over the last five calendar years, that is, from the year \n2020 to the year 2025, 71 athletes at the sum of Rs13,263,716.40 has been disbursed.  \nMr Beechook: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it takes eight long years for a junior student; \neight long years of sweat and blood to become a professional athlete. Will the hon. Minister \nconfirm whether the amount disbursed has been slashed by almost 50 % for all those athletes \npursuing tertiary level studies? \nMr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, I have been made aware that the quantum \nallocated to the athlete pursuing tertiary education has been reviewed by the previous Board \nfrom Rs260,000 up to Rs200,000 per academic year based on a revised set of performance-\nbased criteria. The newly constituted Board of the Trust Fund will assess the existing scheme \nholistically and will come up with a proposal in due course.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Quirin! \nMr Quirin: Merci, M. le président. Si je comprends bien la dernière réponse de \nl’honorable ministre, un nouveau Board vient d’être constitué et peut-on savoir qui est à la \ntête de ce Board? \nMr Nagalingum: I will table the list of all the members to the Table of National \nAssembly.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES – NATIONAL HERITAGE SITES – RESIDENCY BUILDING, PORT \nMATHURIN – PROTECTION POLICY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-march-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/225",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 225,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture – PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS PAGE 10 of 21 Parliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "question": "(No. B/225) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nArts and Culture whether, in regard to National Heritage Sites in Mauritius, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the National Heritage Fund Board, information as to – \n(a)  the policy, if any, established for their protection from disaster risks and impacts \nof climate change, and  \n\n67 \n \n(b)  whether the Board is in presence of a request from Rodrigues for the renovation \nor demolition of the Residency building in Port Mathurin and, if so, indicate if \napproval has been granted therefor and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Gondeea: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed by the National Heritage Fund, a parastatal body operating under aegis of my \nMinistry, that there is currently no national policy in place specifically dedicated to the \nprotection of National Heritage Sites from natural disasters and the impacts of climate \nchange. This is a serious concern especially as Mauritius being a Small Island Developing \nState is increasingly exposed to extreme climate related hazards such as cyclones, torrential \nrainfall, rising sea levels, flooding and coastal erosion, all of which pose significant risk to \nour cultural heritage. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, while no national policy was developed or implemented by the \nprevious government to address this challenge in a comprehensive and coordinated manner, \nsome isolated efforts were made in response to obligation under the World Heritage \nConvention. As such, I am informed that there is a Disaster Risk Management Plan for the \nAapravasi Ghat World Heritage property and there is a draft plan which is under preparation \nfor Le Morne Cultural Landscape. These were initiated as part of UNESCO World Heritage \nSites requirements.  \nHowever, for the vast majority of National Heritage Sites across the country, no \ndisaster preparedness or climate adaptation measures have been systematically adopted nor \nhas the legislation been updated to reflect these urgent needs.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this Government has placed this pressing concern high on its \nagenda, recognising that the conservation and safeguarding of our national heritage must go \nhand-in-hand with disaster and climate resilience. This priority is clearly reflected in the \nGovernment Programme 2025-2029: A Bridge to the Future, which pledges to strengthen \ncultural identity and reinforce the protection and valorisation of heritage sites.  \nAccordingly, the National Heritage Fund Act 2003, which is now outdated, will be \nreviewed. A new National Heritage Authority Bill will be drafted to include, inter alia, \nemergency preparedness plans, integration of climate change adaptation into conservation \nplanning and use of modern tools such as Artificial Intelligence and 3-D scanning to \ndocument, monitor and protect heritage assets.  \n\n68 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the \nNational Heritage Fund that it did not receive any request from the Chief Commissioner’s \noffice of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly for the renovation or demolition works of the \nResidency building in Port Mathurin, Rodrigues. \nHowever, during a visit in Rodrigues, carried out by two officers of the National \nHeritage Fund, on 18 March 2025, at the request of the Rodrigues Tourism Office, the two \nofficers were informed that a tender had already been awarded for the repair and restoration \nof the Residency building. Thereafter, the two officers were called upon to attend a meeting \nwith the Departmental Head of the Commission whereby more details of the renovation \nproject were communicated to them. Since the building is a National Heritage since 2001, the \nDepartmental Head was informed that prior to any repair or restoration works, the clearance \nof the National Heritage Fund should have been sought as stipulated under Section 13(3) of \nthe National Heritage Fund Act 2003. \nI am further informed, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that the National Heritage Fund has on \n20 March 2025, instructed the island’s Chief Executive to stop all works thereat with \nimmediate effect and to submit a detailed clarification on the matter to enable the technical \ncommittee of the National Heritage Fund to examine same and thereafter make appropriate \nrecommendations to the National Heritage Fund Board. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes. \n         Mr François:  I thank the hon. Minister for his answer. May I ask the hon. Minister \nwhether the NHF Board will consider the identification of additional sites of monuments \ndeserving to be designated to the status of historical and cultural heritage sites in Rodrigues, \njust to name a few such as St Gabriel Cathedral, Mauritius Telecom Building at Mont Venus \nand also the last recoverable terraces remained at Dansamy? \nMr Gondeea: Yes of course, we will do it. \nThe Deputy Speaker: One last question? \nMr François: No, I have two, if you allow me, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. It is very \nimportant. As per Schedule (Section 2) of the National Heritage Fund Act - National Heritage \nof Mauritius, Territory of Mauritius, Rodrigues -, out of the list of six sites, there is only one \nprivate property, namely Ben Gontran House at Barclay Street, Port Mathurin. May I seize \nthis opportunity to humbly ask the hon. Minister to request the National Heritage Fund Board \nto discuss with the private owner for necessary measures and support as may be necessary to \n\n69 \n \nmaintain and protect this House so that it does not lose its national heritage identity and \nvalue? Thank you. \nMr Gondeea: Yes, hon. Member, I will ask the National Heritage Fund to do so. Thank \nyou. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Montagne Blanche and GRSE. \nLODGING ACCOMMODATION PERMIT – PERMITS GRANTED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/226",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 226,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/226) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to Lodging \nAccommodation Permit, he will state the – \n(a) \nexpected time frame for an inspection to be carried out upon receipt of a new \napplication therefor, and \n(b)  \nnumber of permits granted in Constituency No. 6, Grand’ Baie and Poudre \nd’Or since 2019 to 2024, giving details thereof.",
      "answer": "(withdrawn) \nBEL AIR RIVIÈRE SÈCHE SSS – LACK OF FENCING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-march-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/227",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 227,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/227) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the Bel Air \nRivière Sèche State Secondary School for girls, he will state if he has been made aware that \nsame is not fenced at the back by the river side constituting a very serious security issue to \nthe students and, if so, indicate – \n(a) when the works will be carried for the fencing thereof, and  \n(b) the expected completion date thereof.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that the Bel Air Rivière \nSèche State Secondary School was constructed some 15 years ago. I wish to inform the \nHouse that the riverside of the school is secured with 1.8 m chained linked fencing. This was \nmeant to be a deterrent for students to leave the school premises and have access to the river. \nHowever, I have to admit that the fencing does not prohibit intruders from entering the \nschool. I am also informed whilst the fencing is still in good condition, yet it might not have \nbeen placed at the right place. \n\n70 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with a view of enhancing security at the school, I have \ninstructed that the possibility of having another fence be explored along the alignment of the \nexisting retaining wall over a stretch of some 120 m, further upwards which will be a more \nsuitable deterrent to intruders. This new proposed structure would go a long way towards \nensuring the safety and security of our students. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that subject to technical feasibility \nand availability of funds. This work can be completed in a short span of time approximately \nfour weeks as from the date of start of the works. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix! \nMETRO EXPRESS PROJECT EXTENSION – FEASIBILITY STUDY – \nPROJECT COST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/228",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 228,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/228) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to Phase 3 of the Metro Express project \nconnecting Rose Hill to Réduit and to be subsequently extended to St Pierre via Cote D’or, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a)  \nwhether a feasibility study was carried out thereinto and, if so, table copy thereof, \nindicating the name of the consultant and amount of funds paid thereto, and  \n(b) \n the costs of the project, indicating the amount of funds for infrastructural works \nto be incurred by Government therefor.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that the phase 3 of the \nMetro Express Project which pertains to the extension of the Metro line over a distance of 3.4 \nkm from Rose Hill to Reduit was implemented following a decision taken by the then \nGovernment on 30 December 2020. \nI would like here Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir to remind the House that at the time, according \nto records available at my Ministry, the light-rail project was being spearheaded by the then \nPrime Minister’s Office. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by Metro \nExpress Ltd that a proper feasibility study that is, a proper technical and financial study was \nnot carried out for phase 3 of the Metro Express Ltd project. In fact, the decision to proceed \nwith the project was made following a case put forward by the consultant for the project, \nSingapore Corporation Enterprise in 2016 in its references design.  \n\n71 \n \nThe Consultant had identified the regions of Ebène, including the Cybercity and Reduit \nas a critical commuter base which justified the need for an efficient mass transit. The then \nmanagement of Metro Express Ltd estimated the number of commuters to be 30,000 at Ebène \nand 11,000 at Reduit. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by MEL that this line has much lower \ncommuter figures, averaging daily 3200 commuters on weekdays, 1490 Saturdays and 522 \nfor Sundays. The total fair amount generated for year 2024 is Rs30,736,428; resulting an \naverage monthly amount Rs2,561,369. Worse, if we take the fair amount for last month, \nFebruary 2025, it is only Rs1.7 million, that is much less than the expected ridership income. \nIt is therefore evident Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that MEL is operating at a terrible loss over \nthe line. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, during the previous mandate, I had, on two occasions, \npersonally drawn the attention of the House and the population at large, firstly, in the much-\ndebated Parliamentary Question No. B/223 of 18 April 2023 and the next one, one month \nlater, PQ No. B/596 that the project was not workable.  \nIn fact, I had used the word ‘total failure’. It is in Hansard. When we take into account \nthat the cost of phase 3 stood at Rs4.55 billion, which is the figure hon. Lobine had requested \nfor in part (b) of the question, a simple calculation shows that this tantamount to Rs1.3 billion \nper km without any cost of train, that is, R 1.34 million par mètre linéaire de voie ferrée. This \ncosted Rs1.34 million from on average from Rose Hill to Reduit. This cost quite a lot. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, these Rs4.55 billion worth of works were effected through a \nvariation to the existing main contract for Metro Express project with Larsen & Toubro. This \namounts coincidentally to 24%, slightly less than the prescribed threshold of 25% of the \nequivalent of Rs18.8 billion for the main contract. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as a professional of the construction industry, I have always \nviewed this particular course of action adopted by the then Government for this particular \nvariation as being highly debatable because the extension per se, was not along the line \nCurepipe to Port Louis but was in a completely distinct new line from Rose Hill to Réduit \nwhich is not in the direction of the main metro line which costed Rs18.8 billion. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to the further extension of the metro line, I am \ninformed that a feasibility study was carried out in October 2021 by a team of Metro Express \nLtd with a technical assistance of RITES Ltd. This study coverered the extension of Metro \n\n72 \n \nline from Reduit towards Cote D’or and St Pierre and from Curepipe to La Vigie. The report \nwas submitted in April 2022 at a total cost of Rs21.98 million nearly Rs22 million out of \nwhich, Rs 18 million was paid to RITES Ltd and Rs3.98 million to the inhouse team at Metro \nExpress Ltd. No tender exercise was done for this consultancy exercise.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to point out that the procurement process for the \nconstruction under phase 4 of the Metro Express project was cancelled by the empowered \nInter-Ministerial Committee of the Government of India in September 2023 and that the \nproject is currently put on hold as advised by the EXIM Bank of India. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Lobine! \nMr Lobine: May I ask the hon. Minister, with regard to the total failure of the Metro \nExpress Project, will his Ministry conduct a comprehensive and full-fledged study as to the \nimpact on the coffers of the State with regard to additional money that this Government will \nnow have to pour in to make this workable, in view of this total failure of Metro Express that \nhas been implemented? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Certainly! We are implementing measures. As a matter of fact, \nI have given instruction to stop the trains working on Sundays because it is a total wastage. \nAs regards to the other days, we will be working on it and try to see how to enhance ridership \non that line. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis \nCentral! \nINVALIDITY PENSIONS – CANCELLATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/229",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 229,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer) PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS PAGE 11 of 21 Parliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/229) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \nwhether, in regard to invalidity pensions, he will state the number of persons whose pensions \nhave been cancelled over the past four years, indicating the – \n(a) \nreasons therefor, and \n(b) \nmeasures taken by his Ministry to ensure that bona fide persons are not penalised.",
      "answer": "Mr Subron: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, first of all, let me thank the hon. Member for this \nquestion and also let me take this opportunity to congratulate the hon. Member for his \nNational Day Award 2025 as Grand Officer of the Order of the Star and Key of the Indian \nOcean for his contribution in the medical and social fields. \n\n73 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that persons suffering from a \ndisability are entitled to an Invalid’s Basic Pension or a Disability Allowance and/or a Carer’s \nAllowance after an assessment by medical board. Under the prevailing system established \nprior to the present Government, a medical assessment is carried out by medical practitioners \nof my Ministry to determine the eligibility to the Invalid’s Basic Pension or Disability \nAllowance or Carer’s Allowance. \nAssessments are carried out either by a medical board which comprises two medical \npractitioners or by one medical practitioner at the claimant’s residence for those whose \nmobility is limited and who cannot attend the medical board. As per law, the entitlement for \nthe Invalid’s Pension is based upon the claimant being at least 60% incapacitated for a period \nof at least 12 months. The law as such does not make any provision for the duration of any of \nthe pensions. A medical guideline, last updated in 2016, in collaboration with the Ministry of \nHealth and Wellness is used by medical practitioners who sit on medical boards for \nassessment of claimants for the benefits. \nThis guideline also provides for the duration of the award of the disability benefits. \nStatistics recently compiled by my Ministry revealed that under the present system, one in \ntwo cases where pension benefits are approved, they are for a period of one year. In 32% of \ncases, pensions are awarded for two years. This means that every year, more than 50% of \ninvalidity pensions or benefits claims being assessed relate to renewal cases, that is, cases \nwhere pension has lapsed, and thus, needs to be reassessed for renewal. This is one of the \nreasons why many Mauritians are dissatisfied with the present system. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, to reply to part (a) of the question on how many cases have \nbeen cancelled for the last four years, firstly, please allow me to make some clarifications. \nDisability related pensions and benefits can be stopped for two reasons – \n(i) \nthey can be suspended in departure cases or in cases of three consecutive non \nencashment of pension or where doubtful documents were produced by \napplicants or malpractices have been reported by whistleblowers, and \n(ii) \npensions and benefits are discontinued after the duration period of the pension \nhas lapsed and same has not been renewed by the medical board. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that for the period July 2021 up \nto 20 March 2025, there were 335 suspended cases of Basic Invalidity Pension (BIP), \nDisability Allowance and Carer’s Allowance. Additionally, 16,134 cases of BIP, Disability \n\n74 \n \nAllowance and Carer’s Allowance have been discontinued for the period of July 2021 up to \n20 March 2025 after reassessment by the Medical Board. \nMoreover, 29,013 cases of BIP, Disability Allowance and Carer’s Allowance have been \ndisallowed that is not granted by the medical board for the same period. It should be pointed \nout that for the same period, my Ministry has received 33,360 applications for Basic \nInvalidity Pension, 1,179 applications for Disability Allowance and 42,915 for Carer’s \nAllowance. For the benefit of the House and the public, I am tabling indicative statistics on \nwhat I have just mentioned. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that under the \npresent legislation, a person’s whose case has been disallowed or discontinued is only \nprovided a statement that the claimant has not satisfied the 60% incapacitated criteria. The \nonus to prove the contrary is put on the claimant who has the right to make an appeal to the \nMedical Appeal Tribunal within a period of one month from the date of disallowance notice. \nIn case claimants do not appeal, they may make a fresh application to the medical board for \nthe benefit after six months. An earlier application can be made in the event that there is \naggravation of the medical condition of the person supported by a medical certificate. \nAs for measures envisaged by my Ministry, I need to highlight that the assessment \nsystem is based on medical guidelines under the Sixth Schedule of the National Pensions Act. \nThus, a broad-based reform is being explored to include the functionality of a potentially \ndisabled person, that is, can the person work? Can the person feed himself or herself? Can the \nperson use public transport? Can the person take care of himself? Just to mention a few \nexamples. \nIn addition, my Ministry is also exploring the reform of the entire operation of medical \nboard. Shall the board have access to the entire medical file of the claimant and perform its \noperations within public hospitals and centres as is presently the case for the claims based on \nEye Vision Disability. Shall the doctors serving on medical boards and carrying domiciliary \nvisits continue to be employed on a sessional contract basis or shall they be the backbone of a \nnew system. Proposals are being considered to include representatives of organisation \nrepresenting people with disabilities within the medical board and appeal tribunal dealing \nwith disabilities benefit entitlements. \nFurthermore, the very criteria of 60% incapacity are being questioned. The possibility \nof introducing a graduated benefit system based on the percentage of incapacity and \n\n75 \n \nfunctionality is being explored. We are studying different systems from different countries in \nthis respect.  \nIn the long run, the introduction and the talking of e-Health System with the e-Social \nSecurity System will greatly facilitate the efficiency and modernisation process once we \nsettle the core issues on the coming reform.  \nTo conclude, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry with the support of the Government \nis moving towards a significant change of the system to ensure a dignified, right-based and \nefficient disability pension benefit system in Mauritius. In this context, to promote \ninclusiveness, my Ministry has opened as from 18 March until 10 April 2025 a last round of \ninput from citizens and associations defending people with disabilities to formulate proposals \nfor changes in disability pensions and benefit system, as well as amendments they deem \nappropriate to the not yet proclaimed Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Persons with \nDisabilities Act 2024. \nThank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you for your long and comprehensive answer. No \nadditional? Do you have a supplementary? \nAn hon. Member: Ena ankor? \nThe Deputy Speaker: One last supplementary because the answer was quite \ncomprehensive. \nDr. Aumeer: Yes. Thank you and thank you for the compliment at the beginning of \nyour answer. May I ask the hon. Minister, based on the medical assessment that we have at \nthe present by medical practitioners and the Medical Board, whether he would also consider \nthe implementation of a Barema system. The Barema system which is being used widely in \nEurope – and I have copies of them from different countries which I will handover to you \nafterwards – that encompasses the medical, functional needs, assistance needs, and above all, \nthe additional cost incurred by relatives. I am hoping that this can be implemented and my \nnext… \n(Interruptions) \nThere is a small question. This is a very sensitive issue. It is on the radio every day, \nvery sensitive. I would like to ask the hon. Minister that there should be in the department, an \nemergency appeal system rather than the normal appeal. An emergency appeal system with \n\n76 \n \nregard to certain individuals who have been invalid since birth, whose condition have not \nchanged but have been denied of the invalidity pension, namely of one case that may make \nhistory for him, of a young boy born epileptic, cerebral palsy, one arm longer than the other, \none leg shorter than the other, who cannot talk, and yet, his pension has been denied. I will \nshare the documents with you. Please look at how these individuals who are bona fide invalid \npeople, can have an emergency system through your Ministry, so that they can have the funds \nto have a better living. \nThank you. \nMr Subron: We are on the same wavelength. Since I took this Office, we share the \nsame concern and we are studying in the same direction. All these suggestions and the \ndocuments that you will submit will be considered.  \nThank you, hon. Member. \nThe Deputy Speaker: I will call B/230! Hon. Third Member for Port Louis South and \nPort Louis Central! \nIMMACULÉE CONCEPTION SCHOOL – BUILDING SECURITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/230",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 230,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/230) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the \nImmaculée Conception School located at corner Jules Levieux Street and Monseigneur Leen \nStreet Ward 4, he will state – \n(a) \nthe number of years the school has not been used for educational purposes, and \n(b) \nif he has been made aware of severe security and health concerns arising from the \nlack of maintenance and oversight of the premises and, if so, indicate the \nmeasures being envisaged to secure the building.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard to part (a) of the question, I have \nbeen informed that the Immaculée Conception School is no longer being used for educational \npurposes since 2012 given its state. \nI am also informed that the premises where the school was formally housed were \nofficially handed over to the Mauritius Police Force in April 2017 for the setting up of a \nPolice warehouse. Following complaints received on the Citizen Support Unit Portal in 2021 \nby inhabitants of the region, my Ministry took note that the Mauritius Police Force did not go \nahead with the said project. \n\n77 \n \nMoreover, the Ministry of Housing and Lands has informed my Ministry on 12 October \n2021 that the premises are under its control, but were being occupied by the Field Services \nUnit, a department falling under the aegis of the Ministry of Local Government. Therefore, \nthis school no longer falls under the purview of Ministry of Education and Human Resource \nsince April 2017. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard to part (b) of the question, my answer is yes. We are \nconscious about the insecurity there. Complaints from the public were made to my Ministry \nin 2021 pertaining to drug addicts and dangerous squatters occupying the premises. The \nMinistry of Housing and Lands was accordingly requested to undertake necessary and \nappropriate actions, given that the land on which stands the ex-Immaculée Conception School \nis under the control of the latter Ministry.  \nAdditionally, the Mauritius Police Force was requested to reinforce Police patrol \naround the premises of the school and take necessary actions against the illegal occupants for \nthe safety and security of the public. This request was reiterated this year again. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River! \nCHAMAREL/PLAINE CHAMPAGNE ROAD – REOPENING – 20 FEBRUARY 2025 \n– ROAD SAFETY SURVEY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-march-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/231",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 231,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/231) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the Chamarel/Plaine Champagne \nRoad, he will state if – \n(a) \na road safety survey has been effected prior to its reopening for road users on 20 \nFebruary 2025 and, if so, give details thereof, and  \n(b) \nconsideration will be given for the cleaning and trimming of trees along same.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Plaine Champagne B103 Road starts at Les \nMares and ends at Chamarel Village, and is approximately 13 km long. Several significant \nsigns of distress and road edge failures were noted along a stretch of 1 km of the B103 road, \nspecifically between Chamarel Rhumerie and Varangue sur Morne, which required \nrehabilitation and grading along that segment. A project for the upgrading of the road and \nslope stabilisation works was accordingly implemented by the Road Development Authority. \n\n78 \n \nWorks have been substantially completed and the road reopened to the public on 20 February \n2025. \nI am informed by the RDA that while major construction works have been completed, \nthere are some minor works and monitoring activities which are still ongoing. As regards \nroad safety survey, I am informed by the Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit \n(TMRSU) that a road safety audit is usually conducted in the context of the construction of a \nnew road, to see whether road safety may be improved on the road prior to its opening. The \nTMRSU has further informed that in the case of the B103 road, the works comprise slope \nstabilisation along a small stretch of the existing road, and accordingly, a road safety audit \nwas not required.  \nHowever, a site visit was carried out by the TMRSU and several road safety \nimprovement measures have been recommended namely, placing of handrails and guardrails \nwhich I am informed have already been implemented. In addition, as part of the project, the \nRDA has submitted road marking, traffic signage and other road furniture details to the \nTMRSU for approval prior to implementation. Given that the road is still being monitored \njointly by the TMRSU and the RDA, a site meeting will be held by both parties by the end of \nMarch 2025 to identify additional safety measures to be implemented if required.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard part (b) of the question, it should be highlighted that \nthe road is heavily bounded by trees and vegetation. Prior to the opening of the road, the \ncontractor on the project had carried out a first cleaning and trimming of trees within the one-\nkilometre segment of the road where the works were ongoing. The cleaning and trimming of \ntrees along that stretch are still ongoing and will be completed by the end of this month. Only \nlast Monday during the management meeting at the level of the RDA, I highlighted that I was \nnot satisfied with the lopping of branches along B103 Road and requested the RDA to take \nurgent remedial actions. The RDA has accordingly committed to complete the cleaning and \ntrimming of trees along the remaining section of B103 road very soon. Subsequently, this will \nform part of the ongoing routine maintenance programme by the RDA’s maintenance section. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \nVALLEE DES PRÊTRES, CHITRAKOOT & CAROLINE REGION – BUS \nTRANSPORT PROBLEM \n\n79",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-march-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/232",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 232,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/232) Mrs A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Land Transport whether he will state if he has been made \naware of the acute problem of bus transportation affecting the inhabitants of Vallée des \nPrêtres, Chitrakoot and Caroline and, if so, indicate the remedial measures being envisaged in \nrelation thereto.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the House is aware that I have been \nreplying to several Parliamentary Questions recently about the poor level of bus transport \nservice island-wide and I believe, this is also the case for regions which the hon. Member has \nreferred to in her question today.  \nIn fact, the House will recall that I have also made several public announcements, in \nand outside the House, stressing on the prevailing malaise in the bus industry. I seize this \nopportunity to reassure the House and the travelling public at large, that the improvement of \nthe level of public bus transport is one of my priorities. We, at the level of my Ministry, are \nfully committed to look for workable solutions with a view to improving the services around \nthe island in line with the numerous measures which I have already enumerated in the House \nduring my previous replies. \nNow, coming to the regions of Vallée des Prêtres, Chitrakoot and Caroline, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir, I am informed by the National Land Transport Authority that the public \ntransportation services in these localities are exclusively offered by the United Bus Service \nthrough the following routes – \n Route 41, Vallée des Prêtres-the New Transportation Centre; \n Route 41A, Upper Vallée des Prêtres; \n Route 160, Vallée des Prêtres-New Transportation Centre; \n Route 160A, Upper Vallée des Prêtres-Cité Vallijee, and \n Route 237, Vallée des Prêtres-Morcellement Raffray, Pailles. \nI am further informed that 13 road service licences have been granted to the United Bus \nService to operate its buses along the aforesaid routes. In accordance with the established \ntimetable, buses along routes 41, 41A, 160 and 160A should operate at 30 minutes interval \nduring peak hours and on an hourly basis during off peak periods. \n\n80 \n \nAs regards Route 237, buses are required to ply at an hourly interval throughout the \nday. The hours of operation along these routes are 05.25 in the morning to 08.00 o’clock at \nnight. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to also point out that inspections conducted by the \nNLTA Inspectorate have revealed that the UBS buses plying in the regions which I have just \nmentioned are not adhering to the prescribed timetable and this has undeniably resulted in \ncomplaints from commuters thereat, in respect of service delays and inconsistencies. The \nNLTA Inspectorate has, in fact, pointed out that the UBS is operating at a lower number of \nbuses out of its operational fleet and this situation has been observed across all its routes \nisland-wide. It is a malaise actually right now despite they have been availed of free \ntransportation service.  \nTo this effect, I have been informed that the NLTA has had dedicated meeting with the \nTraffic Manager of the UBS on 30 August 2024 whereby the latter was apprised of the issues \nand complaints. The representative of the UBS undertook to take remedial actions, \nhighlighting the main cause thereof related to the shortage of drivers and that necessary \narrangements were underway for the recruitment of foreign labour. The representative of the \nUBS was once again convened at the NLTA last month, that is, in February 2025, in view of \nthe persistent situation and it would seem there has been no improvement so far. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to inform the House that I can humbly state that, \nafter four months in Office, I have been able to understand the problems being encountered \nby the travelling public and the reasons thereof which are multiple-pronged. Let me give you \nthree reasons – \n \nFirstly, I am inclined to strongly believe that the issue of recruitment of foreign \nworkers has become some sort of a pretext for several bus operators to keep \ntheir buses in their garage while benefiting at the same time from government \nsubsidies monthly. This is across the board and across all companies. \nUnfortunately, it is a malaise right now. \n \nSecondly, I have been made aware, through various representations that I have \nreceived, several bus operators do not treat their employees properly, and hence, \npotential candidates are reluctant to join these companies. And they do not \nrealise that importing foreign labour can be more expensive. \n\n81 \n \n \nThirdly, in some cases, bus operators have resorted to employing drivers and \nconductors who are not fit and proper for the job and this has led to the alarming \nand dangerous situation whereby we are having cases of bus crew operating \nunder the influence of alcohol and drugs.  \nI have had extensive meetings with the Mauritius Police Force during the course of last \nweek and even before that, to try and address the situation. The recent accident which \noccurred at Solitude whereby a school bus was being driven a conductor, who was not only \nunder the influence of illicit drugs but was not even the holder of a valid driving licence, is \ntelling of the situation we are in right now. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me reassure the House that the introduction of the Fleet \nManagement System, a project on which my Ministry is actively working on, will be a game \nchanger for the bus industry and that will certainly redress the issue of inadequate buses and \nnon-adherence to established timetable. The request for proposal is currently being worked \nout by the consultant and, hopefully, the project will be in place by the end of this year.  \nNevertheless, in the meantime, based on the recommendations of the NLTA regarding \nthe timetable, on the immediate plausible remedial actions, I have asked the latter, I mean the \nNLTA, to consider the possibility of licensing additional RSLs, according to section 77 of the \nRoad Traffic Act 2023 which empowers me to do so, to other bus operators in order to \nimprove the level of service in the regions where inhabitants are encountering acute transport \nproblems, including the regions mentioned in the question of the hon. Member, and I am \nwaiting for a reply from the NLTA. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, one question! \nMrs Savabaddy: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Bus transport is a real headache \nin the regions that I have mentioned in my PQ, Vallée des Prêtres, Chitrakoot and Caroline.  \nM. le président, il est déplorable de constater que certains autobus de la United Bus \nService sont âgés de plus de 15 ans, lesquels sont bons pour de la vielle ferraille, sont \ntoujours en circulation dans la circonscription à l’instar dans les régions citées à l’instant. \nDonc, ma question : est-ce que le ministre compte ouvrir des lignes à d’autres compagnies \nd’autobus ? Clearly, there is no will from the side of the actual bus operators to improve their \nservices there. Can the hon. Minister ask the Inspector of the NLTA to be more active there \nuntil the situation improves? Thank you. \n\n82 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: You repeated what you have just said in the last phrase. \nMr Osman Mahomed: The end of a lifetime of a bus is 20 years old, legally. So, 15 \nyears is five more years to go, but that is not the reason why the bus should not be in good \ncondition. So, I will look into the issue for the specific buses plying that route and will come \nback to the Member in due course. \nMAURITIAN ECONOMY – BRAIN DRAIN ISSUE – REMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-march-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/233",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 233,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea) PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS PAGE 12 of 21 Parliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/233) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to the lack of \nqualified and unqualified workers in the Mauritian economy, he will state the measures being \nproposed to address the issue of brain drain currently affecting the country.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien! \nBUSES & TAXIS – TEMPORARY ROAD LICENCES DELIVERY – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/234",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 234,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/234) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the issue of temporary public \nservice licenses to buses and taxis, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, \ninformation as to the number of such licenses delivered since 2015 to 2024, \nindicating the procedures adopted to award these licenses, and  \n(b) \nstate if consideration will be given for the setting up of an inquiry to look into the \ncircumstances for the granting of these licenses.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the National Land \nTransport Authority that prior to the amendment which was brought to section 77 of the Road \nTraffic Act in 2023, no temporary Road Service Licences were granted. However, I am \ninformed that during the period 24 October 2023 to 16 September 2024, 45 Road Service \nLicences have been granted for the operation of buses, that is, 42 in Mauritius and 3 in \nRodrigues, and the Rodriguan ones are under judicial review right now following application \nmade by the Rodrigues Regional Assembly.  \n\n83 \n \nI wish to point out that according to information provided to me, approval was obtained \nfrom the then Minister of Land Transport and Light Rail for 13 other Road Service Licences \non 01 October 2024 but these licences were not issued by the NLTA as the general elections \nwere imminent. That was 3-4 days before the Parliament was dissolved.  \nThese RSLs have been granted under the provisions of section 77D of the Road Traffic \nAct, which was introduced in 2023 under the Road Traffic (Amendment) Act No. 10, which \ncame into operation on 17 July 2023. This section of the law, in fact, empowers the Minister \nto either – \n1. \ndirect the NLTA to allow an existing license sheet to redeploy his bus from an \nexisting route to another, or  \n2. \ndirect the NLTA to grant a new road service license to an existing licensee to \noperate services along a route designated by the Minister. \nIn both instances, the Minister has to ascertain that the redeployment of any bus for the \ngrant of a new license is in the public interest, based on a report from the NLTA, to the effect \nthat the redeployment or grant of license is justified and that there is a need to supplement the \nservice along any designated route. The Minister while directing the NLTA has also to specify \nthe duration for which the license is to be granted. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, according to the NLTA, all 45 new licenses have been granted \nfollowing applications submitted by existing licenses to the then Minister for specific routes. \nThe NLTA then submitted a report on the need for supplementing bus services along the route \napplied for. The then Minister subsequently directed the NLTA to issue the license.  \nAnother pertinent observation was in respect of the grant of these temporary licenses, is \nthat the law clearly stipulates that – \n“Where the Minister is satisfied that a particular route or area is inadequately served \nand in public interest to improve bus service on that route or area, he may direct the \nNLTA to grant a road service license for such duration he may deem fit [The word \n‘duration’ is listed there]to an existing licensee so as to allow him to operate bus \nservices on such route or area designated by the Minister.” \nHowever, it is worth pointing out that although it is the prerogative of the Minister in \nlaw to determine the duration for which their license is to be granted, such was not the case, I \n\n84 \n \nam given to understand. It would seem, therefore, that the NLTA has taken it upon itself to \ndecide on the temporary licenses to be for an initial period of three months. \nI have also been made aware that these temporary licenses have been subsequently been \nrenewed for an additional period of three months administratively, solely at the level of the \nregulator, which is the NLTA. I have also been informed that in the case of the 45 new \nlicenses issued, officers of my Ministry were not at all involved in the whole licensing \nprocesses. Sealed confidential files moved to and fro between the NLTA and the office of the \nthen Minister.  \nThe Ministry did not have the slightest hint of the rules where licenses were being \ngranted, the manner in which the existing licenses were becoming informed that they should \nsubmit applications to the Minister for any specific route, and the mechanism as to how the \nNLTA was requested to submit a report on the level of service. Nothing could be found in any \nfile in my Ministry, I am told.  \nI am further informed that the whole licensing exercise seems to have been carried out \nin strict confidentiality both at the level of the then Minister’s office and the NLTA. As a \nmatter of fact, there have been several representations from operators as to the manner in \nwhich these temporary law survey licences have been granted, and I am inclined to think that \nthese may have prompted hon. Apollon to come up with this question. The hon. Member may \nrest assured that since I took office at the Ministry, I have stressed that henceforth, all legal \nand administratively established processes should be strictly adhered to. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that the \nestablished administrative procedures have not been duly followed and it would appear that \nthe then Minister was approving the applications for temporary road service licenses without \nreferring these files through proper channel, that is, the administration, resulting, in fact, there \nis no record regarding these applications and the grant thereof at my Ministry; \nI am informed by the NLTA that the Officer-in-Charge of the NLTA took it upon \nhimself to grant these temporary road service licenses for an initial period of three months \ndespite the fact that such duration should have been specified by the Minister as provided \nunder the law. \n\n85 \n \nIn the light of the above, I wish to reassure the hon. Member and the public that, I have \nalready given instructions for an enquiry to be conducted promptly, as per the request of hon. \nApollon for an enquiry, in his main question. \nIn the event, any malpractice is confirmed, in the manner these temporary licenses have \nbeen granted and/or renewed, necessary actions, as may deem necessary, will be initiated \naccordingly. \nAdditionally, an assessment will be undertaken as to whether these temporary licenses \nare still required. In the affirmative, the NLTA will be requested to open up application for \npermanent road service licenses to be granted along the relevant routes for the benefit of the \ntraveling public. \nFinally, I wish to enlighten the House that the buses licensed with a temporary road \nservice licences are benefiting from free travel compensation monthly. \nThank you. \nMr Apollon: Thank you, hon. Minister. According to your answer, I think, a full-\nfledged enquiry should urgently take place. Can the hon. Minister table the list of those who \nhave been granted these licenses as well as those who have not been granted the licenses. \nAlso, can the hon. Minister confirm to the House who signed all these documents? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes, I will table all the information, as requested by the hon. \nMember, for those who were issued a license and for those who made an application, but who \nwere not issued a license because the elections were imminent. The signature of the former \nMinister Ganoo is there. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes! \nVICTORIA & AVENUE BELLE ROSE JUNCTION – TRAFFIC FLOW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/235",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 235,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/235) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the traffic lights situated at the \njunction of Victoria and Avenue Belle Rose, he will state if consideration will be given for the \nrescheduling and/or readjusting thereof to improve traffic flow and enhance road safety for all \nusers.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that the junction of \nVictoria Avenue, Sir Guy Forget Avenue and Avenue Belle Rose is a signalised cross junction \n\n86 \n \nfound along the Metro Express corridor. The signalised cross junction falls under the traffic \nsignal priority system which is managed by the Metro Express Ltd.  \nThe signalised cross junction caters traffic movement in eight directions – so, quite \nbusy – as well as for train movement. The traffic signal sequences were configured thereat \nfollowing a traffic survey carried out in 2018 based on the train’s movement, traffic volume \nand traffic flow. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with the present configuration, the train has priority signal at \nthis junction, as is the case at all metro road junctions. Additionally, traffic along Sir Guy \nForget, which is a one-way street towards Belle Rose Avenue, is provided more green time in \nmornings peak due to higher volume of traffic. Similarly, additional green time has been \nallocated for traffic coming from Victoria Avenue in the direction of Quatre Bornes in the \nmorning and vice-versa in the afternoon based on the traffic survey of 2018. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, almost six years have passed since the traffic light thereat has \nbeen configured and traffic patterns may have evolved during these years. The Metro Express \nLtd. has already been requested to carry out a fresh survey in collaboration with the Traffic \nManagement and Road Safety Unit of my Ministry to that effect and with a view to adapting \nthe configuration of the traffic light based on the findings. The exercise is expected to be \ncompleted in one month’s time. I have, therefore, to thank the hon. Member for coming up \nwith this question as it has given the technicians of my Ministry the opportunity to question \nthe relevance of the six-year-old configuration. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, go on with your question. \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, M. le président, en effet nous avons reçu, le Dr. \nBoolell, vous-même et moi, de nombreuses plaintes des usagers de la route concernant les \nembouteillages au carrefour de l’avenue Victoria et de l’avenue Belle-Rose à Quatre-Bornes.  \nWill the Minister inform the House if his Ministry will envisage to introduce smart \ntraffic light system, communément appelé en français, des feux de signalisation intelligents, \nthat adjust based on real time traffic conditions to enhance efficiency? Thank you, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker.  \nMr Osman Mahomed: I thank the hon. Member for this question. We are actually \nworking in that direction. There is a consultancy exercise that my Ministry is conducting now \nand it is called Adaptative Traffic Control System, which has as qualities, I must say, it is \n\n87 \n \nsmart because it uses Artificial Intelligence to monitor traffic. It will, henceforth, going \nforward, prevent long waiting time when there are no cars, for example. Also, red-light \ncameras – if someone brûle un feu rouge, par exemple, it can spot it. So, we are working in \nthat direction.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, we will take one last question for this session, B/236.  \nHon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes! \nBABY S. CASE – NICU, SSRN HOSPITAL – FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE \nRECOMMENDATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/236",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 236,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/236) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to Baby S. \nadmitted at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of the SSRN Hospital on 21 October 2022, she \nwill state if consideration will be given to making public the recommendations of the Fact-\nFinding Committee set up to look into this case.",
      "answer": "Mrs Navarre-Marie: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that the report of the \nFact-Finding Committee set up to shed light on the circumstances that led to Baby S. being \nadmitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam \nNational Hospital on 21 October 2022, was handed over to the then Minister of Gender \nEquality and Family Welfare on 22 November 2022.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed that the committee was mandated to \ncarry out an in-depth enquiry and to submit its report on the basis of the terms of reference as \nfollows – \na) \nInvestigate into the circumstances leading to the baby being admitted to the \nNICU; \nb) \nInvestigate on the management of and services being provided to the baby; \nc) \nInvestigate on the management of the residential care institutions, shelters for \nchildren falling under the purview of the National Children’s Council, in general, \nand \nd) \nMake recommendations for –  \n(i) \naddressing shortcomings identified; \n\n88 \n \n(ii) \nreforms to be brought with regard to the procedures for the placement of \nminors in residential institutions/shelters for children, and \n(iii) the management of residential institutions/shelters for children. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that the report of the Fact-Finding \nCommittee is being presently examined and consideration will be given to the \nrecommendations or even the report itself being released in due course. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, one last question. Time is nearly over! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, M. le président, would the Minister inform the House \nwhat measures have been implemented so far based on the recommendations of the Fact-\nFinding Committee? Thank you. \nMrs Navarre Marie: As I informed the House, the report is still under consideration \nand further actions will be taken in due course.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Members, the Table has been advised that the \nfollowing PQs have been withdrawn: B/237, B/238, B/240, B/242, B/243, B/245, B/246, \nB/247, B/248, B/249, B/250, B/251, B/252, B/254, B/255,  B/256, B/257, B/258, B/259, \nB/260, B/262, B/263, B/264, B/265, B/266. \nTime is over!  \nThe hon. Madam Speaker will take the Chair.  \nAt this stage, Madam Speaker took the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated. Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker.  \n \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, Sir, I beg to move that all the business on \ntoday’s Order Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to.  \nPUBLIC BILLS \nFirst Reading \n\n89 \n \n On motion made and seconded, The Public Inquiries Bill (No. V of 2025) were read a \nfirst time. \nSecond Reading \nTHE BAIL (AMENDMENT) BILL \n(No. III of 2025) \nOrder for Second Reading read. \n(4.16 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Housing and Lands (Mr S. Mohamed): Madam Speaker, I beg to \nmove that the Bail (Amendment) Bill (No. III) of 2025 be read a second time. \n Madam Speaker, the term “bail” is a common term that is frequently used in our legal \njargon, and I presume, in other jurisdictions also. However, the term “bail” remains an \nundefined term in our law books. It is not even defined under the Bail Act of 1999, which is \nthe main legislation that deals with bail. Even in the Constitution, the term “bail” is not \ndefined, nor is the term “bail” used, other than under section 5(3A) which has, anyway, been \ndeclared unconstitutional. However, Madam Speaker, the alternative term use in the supreme \nlaw of this country is “liberty”. \nIn the law book “Released on Bail: Law and Practice”, written by one D. C. Pandey \nfrom India, it is mentioned under Chapter 2 thereof, and I quote –  \n“The dictionary meaning of the expression ‘bail’ denotes a security for appearance of a \nprisoner for his release. Etymologically, the word is derived from an old French verb \n‘bailer’, which means to “give” or “to deliver”, although another view is that its \nderivation is from Latin term ‘bajulare’, meaning “to bear a burden.”” \nJust like we all bajulare the previous government.  \nIt goes further on to state, and I quote – \n“That [T]he intent of the arrest being only to compel an appearance in court at the \nreturn of the writ, that purpose is equally answered, whether the Sheriff detains his \nperson, or takes sufficient security for his appearance, called bail … because the \ndefendant is bailed, or delivered to his sureties, upon their giving security for his \nappearance…” \nBail is accordingly, Madam Speaker, a conditional liberty and the right to personal \nliberty is a fundamental right that is enshrined in our Constitution under section 5 thereof. \nBail thus stands at the crossroads of liberty and security, between the presumption of \ninnocence and the imperative of justice. \n\n90 \n \nHowever, Madam Speaker, in lieu of upholding this fundamental right of a citizen to be \nat liberty, this House will recall that, in the not so past, the then Commissioner of Police \ndisagreed on many occasions with the advice of the Director of Public Prosecutions not to \nobject to the release of on bail of several defendants. This situation even led to the \nCommissioner of Police lodging a plaint before the Supreme Court [The Commissioner of \nPolice v The Director of Public Prosecutions SCR No.124745] for constitutional relief \npursuant to section 83 challenging the powers of the DPP with regard to, inter alia, bail \nproceedings at investigation stage. \nMadam Speaker, since the institution of this new Government, this House will certainly \nagree that this conflict has subsided, but to avoid any such conflict occurring again in the \nfuture, this Bill is being proposed so as to amend the Bail Act with a view to delimiting the \nrespective powers of the DPP and those of the CP with regard to matters pertaining to the \nrelease on bail of a defendant or detainee, and with a view to bringing about certainty in this \narea of the law. \nMadam Speaker, let me now explain to the House how this uncertainty arose. As per \nsection 4(4)(b) of the Bail Act, it provides that where, immediately after ordering the release \nof a defendant or detainee, the Magistrate is notified by the DPP that an application to set \naside his decision is being made before the Supreme Court and that a stay of execution is \nrequired, the Magistrate shall stay execution of the order and remand the defendant or \ndetainee until the Supreme Court determines the application. In other words, Madam \nSpeaker, only the DPP, and not the Commissioner of Police, has the power to move for a stay \nof the decision of the Magistrate. \nHowever, and most surprisingly, section 4(4)(b) of the Bail Act further provides that \nwhere a Magistrate has ordered the release on bail of a defendant or detainee, both the DPP \nand the Commissioner of Police have the power to make an application before the Supreme \nCourt to set aside the decision to release the defendant or detainee on bail. \nThese aforementioned provisions are not in consonant with each other as, on the one \nhand, it is only the DPP who has the power to move for a stay of execution of the decision of \nthe Magistrate to release a defendant or detainee on bail while, on the other hand, both the \nDPP and Commissioner of Police have the power to make an application to the Supreme \nCourt to set aside the decision of a Magistrate to release a defendant or detainee on bail.  \n\n91 \n \nThis is absurd, Madam Speaker. If you do not have the power to move for a stay of \nexecution of the decision of a Magistrate, which power is conferred precisely make an \napplication to the Supreme Court to set aside the decision of the Magistrate, how can you, \nwhen not having the power to move for a stay of execution of the decision of the Magistrate, \nhave the power to make an application to the Supreme Court? In fact, this uncertainty in the \nlaw has created this situation of conflict, the more so that two authorities cannot have the \nsame powers.  \nI have perused the Hansard debates to the Bail Bill of 1999 and, astonishingly, the Bail \nBill which was debated in this Assembly did not contain the provisions that I mentioned \nearlier. In fact, Madam Speaker, these provisions were introduced at Committee Stage of that \nBill. Maybe, and I say maybe, when amending the Bill, the Bail Bill of 1999 at Committee \nStage, a mistake in the drafting of the new provisions may have been made, thus creating that \nuncertainty in the law.  \nMoreover, the current law grants parallel authority to both the Director of Public \nProsecutions and the Commissioner of Police to object to bail. The intention was never to \ncreate conflict but to ensure continuity. Therefore, in the absence of the DPP’s representative, \nthe police could object to bail based on factual concerns. The DPP, upon reviewing the case \nand preparing for the hearing, would determine whether the objection was legally justified. If \nthe DPP disagreed, the objection would be withdrawn, and the police would abide by this \ndecision. \nHowever, recent practice has deviated from this. The then Commissioner of Police has \nclaimed the power to persist in objecting to bail, and even when the DPP - constitutionally \nentrusted with prosecutorial oversight - considered that there was no legal basis for such \nopposition. Worse still, the Commissioner of Police engaged the services of lawyers in the \nprivate practice to argue cases of the DPP found untenable.  \nThis encroachment blurred the lines between investigation and prosecution, two distinct \nfunctions assigned by the Constitution to two separate authorities. It led to a toxic situation – \none where the police and the apex prosecuting authority were in open conflict, forced into \nlawsuits against each other. One where public trust in this justice system eroded, as citizens \nquestioned whose orders the police were truly following. One where suspicions of political \ninterference in the detention of citizens became all to justified. \n\n92 \n \nWith a view to therefore addressing these issues, this Bill reinstates the primacy of the \nDPP in prosecutorial decision-making, ensuring that bail objections are legally sound, free \nfrom undue influence, and consistent with the rule of law. \nMadam Speaker, a Magistrate’s ruling on bail depends on the objections raised by the \nprosecution. These objections must be grounded in facts – facts best known to the police. \nWhether an accused has strong family ties that mitigate the risk of evading justice, whether \nkey witnesses remain to be interviewed and need to be protected from interference, these are \nfactual considerations for the police to highlight. As such clause 4 of the Bill provides that \nthe Commissioner of Police will have the sole discretion not to object to the release on bail of \na defendant or detainee before a court. \nHowever, where an application is made before a Court for the release on bail of a \ndefendant or detainee and the Commissioner of Police has the intention to object to such \nrelease, he shall seek the advice of the Director of Public Prosecutions thereon and the \ndecision to object or not to object to such release shall rest solely on the DPP. The reasoning \nto give the DPP the sole discretion is because denying bail is a question of law, one that falls \nwithin the competence of the DPP only. \nMadam Speaker, Clause 6 of the Bill further provides that where a Magistrate orders \nthe release on bail of a defendant or detainee, the power to about the Supreme Court for an \norder setting aside the determination of the Magistrate to release the defendant or detainee on \nbail shall henceforth rest solely on the DPP, in lieu and instead of both the DPP and the \nCommissioner of Police. \nIn addition, it is being provided, in clause 6 of the Bill, that where the DPP fails to \napply to the Supreme Court for an order setting aside the determination of the Magistrate to \nrelease a defendant or detainee on bail not later than 7 days after such an order, the defendant \nor detainee who had been remanded to custody must, on the next day following the expiry of \nthe 7-day period, be brought before the Court who shall thereupon release him on bail as \noriginally ordered by the Court.  \nOpportunity has also been taken, Madam Speaker, – \na) in clause 3 of the Bill, to redefine the term “detainee”; and \nb) in clause 5 of the Bill, to clarify some bail-related provisions.  \nI wish to inform the House that the Office of the DPP and the DPP have been consulted \nand he has no objection to the amendments being proposed to the Bail Act.  \n\n93 \n \nMadam Speaker, I am being tasked in the absence my good friend, the hon. Attorney \nGeneral, who is not present and is unable to come here today to pronounce this speech. I \nwould like to… \nMadam Speaker: I am sorry, hon. Minister, may I just say a word?  \nMr Mohamed: Yes. \nMadam Speaker: I was actually thinking that maybe, it is important for the record, \nthat you should say that you are now Acting Attorney General and it is in that capacity that \nyou are making this speech and you are going to run through the Bill. Thank you.  \nCarry on, please!  \nMr Mohamed: This is precisely what I was about to say at this juncture. This is what I \nwas about to say now, and this is why I took note here. I have said that I have been tasked \nwith having to pronounce this speech today in the National Assembly as Acting Attorney \nGeneral. My good friend, the hon. Attorney General, cannot attend the National Assembly \ntoday.  \nI have spoken to him just before pronouncing this speech and sought further \ninstructions from him. I would like to not only thank him, but also, thank all the officers at \nthe Attorney General’s Office and those who have drafted this Bill. They have done an \nexcellent job. I also thank them for having briefed me in the absence of my, I would say, a \nSenior Counsel, my learned senior, for pronouncing and presenting this Bill to the Assembly. \nSo, if I may now go on.  The Bill is not merely a procedural matter, Madam Speaker. It \nis a constitutional and societal issue. The right to liberty is sacred, but so too is public \nconfidence in our justice system. This Bill reaffirms a fundamental principle, that is, the \nadministration of justice must be guided by law, not convenience, and certainly not political \ninfluence.  \nThe Bail (Amendment) Bill before the House brings must needed clarity to a legal \nframework that, in recent times, has been clouded by uncertainty and exploited for political \nends. \nLike the recent amendments to the Financial Crimes Commission Act, this Bill restores \nclarity, fairness and the rule of law. It ensures that the decisions on bail are made by those \nconstitutionally entrusted to do so and that the balance between individual freedom and the \npursuit of justice is upheld.  \n\n94 \n \nWith these words, Madam Speaker, I commend the Bill to the House. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister! \n(4.31 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade \n(Mr D. Ramful): Thank you, Madam Speaker. Madam Speaker, I will be very short since we \nare dealing with a few amendments to the Bail Act. But I should say that although the \namendments are few, they go a long way in showing our determination and our commitment \nto enhance transparency in the decision-making process of our institutions and also in \nreinforcing the powers and the independence of our institutions.  \nToday, we are talking about the powers of the Police, the Commissioner of police in \nparticular, and also, the DPP’s Office. Madam Speaker, we probably do not realise, but in a \nvery short span of time, we have done so much in restoring the image of our institutions. \nSome of the Ministers here will concur with me – we are part of the Cabinet and we know \nhow the hon. Prime Minister and the hon. Deputy Prime Minister have been working so hard \nin bringing amendments before this House to restore the image of our institutions.  \nWe are talking about institutions having constitutional status, not parastatal bodies, not \ninstitutions under Ministries, but we are talking here about very important institutions which \nare in our Constitution. The population has witnessed that as soon as we have come in power, \nthe hon. Prime Minister has brought in very important amendments in order to restore the \nimage of these institutions. \n  Madam Speaker, this Parliament is a vivid example – your nomination as Speaker. \nYou are shining in the Chair, Madam Speaker! \nMr Ramful: Votre rayonnement est en train d’éclairer les débats dans cette Chambre. \nFor just one minute, just compare, I was in this House… \nHon. Members: Ayo! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Do not compare! \n\n95 \n \nMr Ramful: Just for one minute… \nAn hon. Member: Non ! Même pas ! Même pas ! \nMr Ramful: …just compare how the debates are going on now and compare it to the \nten last years! \nAn hon. Member: Ayo! \nMr Ramful: I know in the previous debates, orators have been speaking about it. But it \nis important that we repeat it and repeat it again because we do not want this to happen again \nto our democracy. On a récemment apporté les amendements, the Financial Crimes \nCommission (Amendment) Bill was introduced. Once again, in order to bring transparency, \nafin de restaurer la crédibilité et l’indépendance du DPP on cases with regard to corruption \nand anti-money laundering. \nMadame la présidente, il y a plusieurs exemples where this Government has had to \nintervene, as I have said, in a very short span of time to bring in corrective measures. The \nPolice Force is another example. Qu’est-ce qu’on n’a pas vu ? Qu’est-ce qu’on n’a pas \ntémoigné sous l’ancien régime par rapport au commissaire de police ? Today, we have a new \nCommissioner who is rebuilding the trust of the people in the Police Force. Never in the \nhistory of our country have we seen, have we witnessed our institutions being so undermined. \nTheir image tarnished by a government as has been the case over the past 10 years. \nAs I have said and I repeat it because it is important that people know we are not \ntalking about minor institutions; we are talking about very important institutions that have \nconstitutional status. Madame la présidente, when the drafters of the Constitution, the past \npolitical leaders were sitting in Lancaster House trying to bring in propositions to consolidate \nour Constitution, ils mettaient des garde-fous so that they can secure the independence of our \ninstitutions. There was a reason behind that. It is because they wanted the population to have \ntrust in our Constitution and in our institutions. These were the reasons why they had \nimposed garde-fous. They wanted the institutions to not only operate in independence, but \nalso be seen to operate in independence. \nMadame la présidente, on parlait à cette époque, if you go through le procès-verbal de \nces comités, you will see that they were even talking at that time about the queen appointing \nthe Commissioner of Police, because they wanted these institutions to have the independence \nthat is required so that the people can trust these institutions. Mais malheureusement, sous \n\n96 \n \nl’ancien régime, cela n’a pas été le cas. By starting from the top; la présidence, Madame la \nprésidente, there was a mistrust between the President at that time, and the Prime Minister.  \nL'affaire Sobrinho… \n(Interruptions) \nLa présidente de la République a même institué une commission d’enquête ratée \nwithout consultation from the Cabinet of Ministers. Et puis, elle s’est retrouvée elle-même \nface à une commission d’enquête. So, there was that mistrust between the two institutions and \nc’est comique, mais we could have ended up in an institutional clash between two very high \ninstitutions in our Constitution: la présidente de la République et le bureau du Premier \nministre. Vous imaginez? There was also the Commissioner of Police. You remember, the \nCommissioner of Police was placed on probation, even the head of the CID! He also was on \ncontract and they were being used to arrest political opponents. \nMadam Speaker, there was also the recommendation of the Commission on the \nPrerogative of Mercy. I remember the case of the son of the former Commissioner of Police, \nwiping out a conviction of twelve months’ imprisonment without any reason and in total \nopacity. This is how our institutions were functioning at that time. The political appointment \nof political agents dans l’Electoral Supervisory Commission and the Electoral Boundaries \nCommission shows a blatant disrespect that the previous government had to the independence \nof these constitutional institutions. \nMadame la présidente, with regard to this… \nMadam Speaker: Bill. \nMr Ramful: …Act, similarly back in 1999, the Labour Party had brought a new Bail \nAct and when the Act was passed, the idea was to make the granting of bail the rule and the \nobjecting to bail, the exception. But again, little did we know that we would have a former \nCommissioner of Police who would usurp the powers of the DPP and refuse bail as explained \nby the Acting Attorney General, in cases where there were political opponents. This even \nresulted in an institutional clash between the Police, the Commissioner of Police, and the \nDPP’s Office, resulting in Court cases before our Courts of Law.  \nThis is why, Madam Speaker, we are having to intervene today once again in order to \nbring back trust in our Constitution, in our institutions that have constitutional status, by \n\n97 \n \ndefining with clarity the powers of the Commissioner of Police and the powers of the DPP \nwhen it comes to bail applications. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you so much. Yes, hon. Junior Minister! \n (4.43 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Arts and Culture (Mrs V. Leu-Govind): Merci, Madame la \nprésidente. \nMadam Speaker: Try, Junior Minister! If I may, try and speak a bit about the Bill, \nplease. \nMrs Leu-Govind: Okay sure, fine. \nMadame la présidente, comme les deux honorables ministres qui m’ont précédée, je ne \nsuis ni avocate et je n’ai aucun bagage juridique. Je m’adresse à cet auguste Assemblée sur le \nBail (Amendment) Bill en étant qu’une citoyenne concernée et engagée avec ce présent \ngouvernement pour promouvoir l’espace démocratique dans le respect de la Constitution et \nde notre Etat de droit. \nMadame la présidente, je constate que l’honorable Adrien Duval du PMSD et \nl’honorable leader de l’opposition… \n(Interruptions) \n…ne se sont pas engagés à prendre la parole sur cet important projet de loi. Je comprends que \nle MSM ne participe pas, car durant leur parcours de ces dix dernières années, ils ont torpillé \nle bureau du DPP. Mais, l’honorable Adrien Duval et le PMSD ne participent pas ; c’est la \npreuve de ce qu’est devenu, et de ce qui reste du PMSD en termes de respect et d’importance \naccordée au mot ‘démocratie’, et du bureau du DPP. \nMadame la présidente, notre pays a traversé une grave crise institutionnelle. Nos \ninstitutions étaient gangrénées, pourries par le gouvernement MSM sans scrupules, avec la \ncomplicité d’un commissaire de police corrompu qui a abusé de ses pouvoirs pour des fins \npolitiques. Ce commissaire n’était rien d’autre qu’une marionnette entre les mains du couple \nJugnauth, dont la toxicité a empoisonné nos institutions. \n\n98 \n \nMadame la présidente, dans cette force policière, la compétence, l’expérience, n’étaient \nplus critères de promotion. Ce qu’il fallait, tout simplement, participer dans des cover-up ou \nsimplement une simple application de gel. C’est écœurant…  \n(Interruptions) \n…dégradant, et tout simplement honteux, Madame la présidente ! \n(Interruptions) \nLa police qui sensée nous protéger, était devenue un motif de peur ; poursuites \nfabriquées, planting, arrestations sélectives, abus du recours aux charges provisoires, un \nclimat d’oppression s’est installé, et nous en avons été profondément choqués d’apprendre \nqu’il existait dans nos rangs des policiers tortionnaires, Madame la présidente. Oui, \ntortionnaires ! Ceux qui ont torturé, humilié des prisonniers en utilisant des tasers sur leur \nparties intimes. Ce sont des actes inhumains et j’espère sincèrement qu’ils paieront très \nbientôt pour leurs crimes, Madame la présidente. Notre pays était devenu un véritable état \npolicier, au service d’une police politique dirigée par le MSM. \nMadame la présidente, dans tout cela, notre seul rempart était et reste le judiciaire. \nHeureusement, deux femmes magistrates ont su redonner espoir à notre système judiciaire. \nFace aux pressions politiques, elles ont tenu bon. Avec conviction, je parle-là des cas Kistnen \net de Bruneau Laurette. \nMadam Speaker, we must also reflect on the disgraceful and unprecedented attack on \njudicial independence made by the former Prime Minister, who had the audacity to call a \nCourt Ruling “enn zizman bankal”. This shocking statement exposed the MSM’s utter \ndisregard for the judiciary. It is disgraceful coming from a so-called lawyer.  \nToday, in stark contrast, the current Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister have \ngiven a lesson in governance by not interfering in his case when he was arrested by the FCC, \neven when the public wanted to see him behind the bars.  \nMadame la présidente, regardons dans le rétroviseur. Le MSM a toujours voulu \ncontrôler le DPP. Souvenons-nous de la fameuse Prosecution Commission en 2016 qui a \nmené à la démission du PMSD, grâce à des experts en droit qui ont su éclairer son leader sur \nles dangers de cette loi. Je tiens à remercier chaleureusement l’un d’entre eux qui, bien en \nn’étant même pas membre du PMSD, a agi par conviction profonde pour la démocratie et \nl’indépendance judiciaire, c’est l’honorable Khushal Lobine. \n\n99 \n \nMadame la présidente, je saisi cette occasion pour saluer l’honorable Adrien Duval qui \nfut le premier à démissionner à cause de cette dérive. Mais, hélas, quelques années plus tard, \nil a oublié son combat et s’est précipité, aveuglé par le pouvoir ou peut-être l’argent, pour \naller s’asseoir sur la chaise du ‘Loudspeaker’. Le pauvre, lui-même ne savait pas qu’il a été \ndémis de ses fonctions par le Premier ministre.  \n‘Putting my son first’, tel a toujours été la devise du leader du PMSD –c’est pour cela \nqu’il est le seul à avoir échapper à la colère populaire – en sacrifiant des piliers comme \nAurore Perraud, qui a tant travaillé dans la circonscription numéro 4, et bien d’autres \ncompagnons, jetés comme des pions. Comme on dit en créole, dan karo kann ! \nJe suis fière d’avoir était la première à quitter ce parti et fière aussi de l’honorable \nRichard Duval et de l’honorable Khushal Lobine qui ont, eux aussi, quitté ce navire pour \nfonder ensemble avec d’autres amis les Nouveaux Démocrates, un parti d’avenir.  \nMadame la présidente, je félicite notre Attorney General. Depuis sa nomination, il n’a \npas eu un jour de répit. Il a travaillé sans relâche sur plusieurs amendements pour restaurer la \ndémocratie et redonner son indépendance au judiciaire et au DPP. Je sais qu’il n’a pas eu le \nluxe de déguster du sanglier ou de chiper un Blue au Stag Party comme son prédécesseur. \nMadam Speaker, I would like to express my strong support to the Bail (Amendment) \nBill, a crucial legislative reform brought forward by this Government. This Bill ensures that \nthe DPP alone has the final say on the prosecution matters, free from any interference. It \nremoves the Commissioner of Police’s abilities to independently object to bail, making it \ncrystal clear that only the DPP can challenge a bail decision before the Supreme Court.  \nWith this Bill, we send an unmistakable message. Never again will a government be \nable to manipulate the DPP’s Office for political ends. Never again will the Police be turned \ninto a political weapon. Never again will the Judiciary be undermined for the sake of power.  \nMadame la présidente, notre pays a traversé une grave crise institutionnelle. Nos \ninstitutions étaient engrainées, comme je vous l’ai dit, mais grâce à cet amendement, \naujourd’hui, on va retrouver la liberté et l’indépendance de notre système judiciaire.  \nTo conclude, Madam Speaker, I would like to quote George Herbert – \n“Where there is a will, there is a way.” \n\n100 \n \nMadam Speaker, today, in this House, we have the will, we have the competence, we \nhave the motivation, the quality and the quantity and under the guidance of our Prime \nMinister and Deputy Prime Minister, we are on the right path to make Mauritius be Mauritius \nagain.  \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Junior Minister, thank you. I would like you to be careful and \nperhaps withdraw one part of your speech because you were talking about hon. A. Duval \nwho, maybe, is not present, but he is a Member of the House, and I don’t think you are \nallowed to impute motives when you said that part. You know what I mean, that ‘maybe he \ndid it for money’. That would be imputing motives. We don’t want to open a debate later on \nthis issue. If you could, please, kindly withdraw that part. \nMrs Leu-Govind: I withdraw it, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you! \nYes, now, I have Mr Baboolall. \n(4.53 p.m.) \nMr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE): Thank you, \nMadam Speaker.  \nThe Bail (Amendment) Bill is indeed clarifying the powers of the DPP and the \nCommissioner of Police. Madam Speaker, the Republic of Mauritius is a democratic State \nand the Constitution is the supreme law. The Constitution guarantees our fundamental rights \nand freedom of the individual. Section 5 of the Constitution embodies the protection of right \nand personal liberty.  \nMadam Speaker, the right to liberty of an individual is enshrined in section 5 (3) of our \nConstitution and is reflected in section 3 of the Bail Act 1999, which provides that – \n“Notwithstanding any other enactment and subject to section 4, every defendant or \ndetainee shall be entitled to be released on bail.” \n\n101 \n \nIn considering any application, the learned Magistrate bears in mind the fundamental \nconditional principle that freedom is the rule and detention on account of reasonable \nsuspicion the exception, and must see to it that bail is not being withheld as a form of \npunishment. \nMadam Speaker, on the other hand, the Director of Public Prosecutions derives his \npowers under section 72 of the Constitution. Section 72(6) states that – \n“In the exercise of the powers conferred upon him by this section, the Director of \nPublic Prosecutions shall not be subject to the direction or control of any other person \nor authority.” \nWhereas the Commissioner of Police, powers are vested in him by section 71 of the \nConstitution. \nMadam Speaker, this Bill presented by the hon. Attorney General is a clear sign that the \nliberty of the people that they voted for on 10 November 2024, will always be respected and \nthis Government is doing its best to restore democracy. \nMadam Speaker, the previous government was a fake one. We had a fake Prime \nMinister, a fake Speaker and not forgetting, the fake Commissioner of Police, where powers \nwere abused upon the citizens of this country. People were scared because the ‘Kitchen’ \ncould strike at any time with a ‘Striking Team’. And even when the Judiciary was protecting \nthe rights of the citizens as per the Constitution and the laws of this land, all kind of \nloopholes were circumvented to oppress people and control the liberty. One of them is the \nBail Act, as rightly pointed out by the hon. Acting Attorney General at section 4 (b) of the \nBail Act.  \nPreviously, this was not the case, this law has been here since long but all has started \nwhen the Commissioner of Police wanted to control everything. Madam Speaker, the case of \nBruno Laurette is a clear-cut case to explain how the CP wanted to control everything. Hon. \nMinister Shakeel Mohamed, who is presenting the Bill today, was his barrister, he stated at \nthat time: ‘Le Commissaire de police n’a pas le locus standi selon la loi pour entrer une telle \naction.’ That was at that time. Madam Speaker, the Commissioner of Police wanted to \nattempt a kind of constitutional revolution that would make the CP the one who would hold \nthe power of release or detain a suspect alone. The case of Akil Bissessur – this explains why \n\n102 \n \nthis Bill is necessary. What happened in the case of Akil Bissessur? He was arrested by the \nStriking Team; he was presented before a court of law; his counsel put a motion for his \nrelease on bail and the Commissioner of Police asked for the DPP to be present on that day, \nand when the State Law Officer was present on that day, he stated that there was no objection \nfor his release. What happened? On that day, Madam Speaker, the fake government and the \nfake Commissioner of Police were not happy. They had to do everything in their capacity to \nprevent this release. Everything was done to please Pinokio because he nominated the CP. \nMadam Speaker, this has never happened before any court of law in Mauritius, and \nneither did the Police prosecutor say a word. But what happened? The Superintendent of \nPolice, Mr Gungadin, made the following statement on the floor of the court, he stated – \n“The CP is abroad in France. Prior from leaving the country on Saturday, he was \nformally instructed to attend court today in virtue of the constitutional powers vested \nupon him. He has instructed me that if the DPP goes against the Police instruction, then \nit is for the police to object and to mention his stand that, if need be, the Office of the \nCP will solicit help from outside of the DPP’s Office.” \nHe states that this is interference of the DPP. Guess on whom the Commissioner of Police \nplaced his bet in this case? It is none other than Mr Yerrigadoo who knows how to play, and \nMrs Sonah-Ori, the former Prime Minister’s Attorney, looting again the tax payers’ money \nfrom the backdoor. \nThe Commissioner of Police felt aggrieved in the manner in which the DPP appeared to \nhave usurped the CP’s power, which was never his power in any way! He filed six grounds \nbefore the Supreme Court. All these grounds failed, Madam Speaker, on the preliminary \nobjections raised by the Counsel for Mr Akil Bissessur.  \nIn relation to the Supreme Court, Madam Speaker, in relation to the case of Rangasamy \nv the DPP, the full bench of the Supreme Court considered the jurisdictional basis to review \nany decision of any subordinate court in criminal matters. It is trite law that a review \nenvisaged under section 4(4) (a) of the Bail Act and section 82(1) of the Constitution entails a \nrehearing of the Supreme Court. Even though in the case of Mr Bissessur, there was no \nruling. Still, the Machiavellian team tried to challenge the learned magistrate and the DPP. \nMadam Speaker, the fake CP was willing to improvise a disguise way of challenging \nthe constitutional powers that the DPP holds and wanted to hold the power to arrest, release \n\n103 \n \nand detain a suspect. Now, the Bail (Amendment) Bill will amend the Bail Act so as to \ndelimit the respective powers of the DPP and those of the Commissioner of Police. \nMadam Speaker, the DPP will be the only one to decide whether to object or not for the \nrelease of a detainee and also, the power to apply to the Supreme Court for an order setting \naside the determination of the magistrate to the release of the detainee on bail. This \nGovernment will make sure that the rights and freedom of the citizens are respected, the rule \nof law prevails, and where the DPP will continue to enjoy the constitutional powers entrusted \nto him as guaranteed by the Constitution.  \nI support the Bill presented to the House, Madam Speaker. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, Ms J. Bérenger! \n(Interruptions) \nNo? You want a break? Okay!  I am so sorry.  \nI am in the hands of everybody. I think everybody wants to go for tea. Let us break. \nVous ne perdez rien à attendre votre tour. \nAt 5.02 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.44 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, can we carry on, Ms J. Bérenger? \nThe Junior Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate \nChange (Ms J. Bérenger): Madam Speaker, les mo komanse par dir ki mo akeyir pozitivman \nsa proze lalwa-la Bail (Amendment) Bill. Gouvernman ena rezon pou vinn klarifie rol \ndirekter pourswit piblik (DPP) ek rol lapolis konsernan kosion. Li enn reform ki neseser… \nMadam Speaker: Do not go too long in Kreol. You know I am in favour, but according \nto the Standing Orders, we have to use English and French. I am not stopping you for good. I \ndo appreciate you are using Kreol, but we are not, strictly speaking, allowed to use Kreol. \nMs J. Bérenger: Madame la présidente, je comprends les contraintes et je suis disposée \nà donner une copie de mon discours au Hansard Unit s’il le faut. \nMadam Speaker : Non, non ! Je ne peux pas vous laisser parler et dire votre discours \nen entier en Kreol pour le moment. Ça va venir. \n\n104 \n \nMs J. Bérenger: Madame la présidente, c’est tant mieux si l’on veut adapter la \ntechnologie et les compétences, si l’on veut consacrer le Kreol Morisien dans nos lois. Mais \ncomme je l’ai expliqué la dernière fois, rien ne nous empêche aujourd’hui de donner une \nlecture plus démocratique à notre constitution dès maintenant, sans attendre la création des \ncomités. \nMadam Speaker: Je ne peux pas être d’accord avec vous ! \nMs J. Bérenger: Je respecte votre décision, mais dans ces conditions, je n’ai… \nMadam Speaker: Non, mais je tiens compte de ce que vous dites. Je tiens compte. \nMs J. Bérenger: Dans ces conditions, je n’ai pas d’autre choix, Madame la présidente. \nMon discours sera, comme le Kreol Morisien, aujourd’hui, réduit au silence.  \nMadam Speaker: Too bad!  \nHon. M. Seeburn! \n(5.48 p.m.) \nMr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle): Thank you, \nMadam Speaker. Madam Speaker, let me first thank the hon. Attorney General for working \nrelentlessly and coming forward with this amendment to the Bail Act that will bring certainty \nto this area of the law.  \nThis Government is leading the fight to build a fairer and more equitable justice system. \nThe previous government has aimed to circumvent the powers of the Office of the Director of \nPublic Prosecutions when they allowed the Commissioner of Police to challenge the \nconstitutional powers of the DPP, something that never happened before. \nMadam Speaker, the amendment to the Bail Act is to consolidate and restore the powers \nof the DPP that was originally vested with. Our Prime Minister, Dr. Navin Ramgoolam \nrightly said that we are at a defining moment in the history of our country, moving towards a \ntotal reconstruction of our nation and foster a system with an inclusive society where unity \nand justice will prevail. \nMadam Speaker, the existing conflict between the Commissioner of Police and the \nOffice of the DPP, our fundamental right of liberty guaranteed under the Constitution, is at \nstake. As we know, the rationale behind the Bail Act is to ensure that liberty is the rule and \n\n105 \n \ndeprivation of liberty on the grounds of objection is merely an exception. Time and again, \nthis has been emphasised by the courts of law in Mauritius and by the Judicial Committee of \nthe Privy Council where its decision is grounded in our Constitution, being the final quote of \nappeal. \nMadam Speaker, it is section 72 of the Constitution that establishes and sets out the \npowers of the DPP where the DPP has the power to institute and undertake all criminal \nproceedings before a court of law. The DPP is further empowered to take over and continue \nany such criminal proceedings that may have been instituted by another person or to \ndiscontinue any such proceedings at any stage before judgment is delivered. \nMadam Speaker, section 10(6) of our Constitution secures a constitutional guarantee of \nthe independence of the DPP to exercise its powers free from the direction, no control of any \nother person. This further enriches the principles of separation of powers embodied in our \nConstitution. The integrity of the judicial process with the powers of the DPP would be \ncompromised, should the Police be allowed to object bail applications without the DPP’s \nconsent. \nMadam Speaker, the Commissioner of Police already has a huge responsibility for \noverseeing its operations and ensuring the effective enforcement of laws that are \nimplemented for the safety and security of the community. They must further demonstrate \nthat they are applying the law fairly and operate with transparency. \nMadam Speaker, we recently felt the troubling times the country went through, with the \ndisturbing turn of conflict between the Office of the DPP and that of the Commissioner of \nPolice, who opposed the decision of the DPP who decided not to challenge the ruling of the \nSenior Magistrate at the Moka District Court in the case of one Mr B. L. who was granted \nbail, and again, in another case of lawyer Mr A. B. where the Office of the DPP stood up, not \nto object to his bail application.  \n This confrontation between the important organs of the State became public when we \nsaw the head of a constitutional post, being the Commissioner of Police, who came out \npublicly against another head of a constitutional post, thus, putting in serious doubt its legal \njudgment.  \nMadam Speaker, I am sure that when the father of our nation, late Sir Seewoosagur \nRamgoolam, who campaigned for our independence 57 years back and negotiated and \n\n106 \n \napproved the Constitution that time, the prominent question in his mind would have been to \nensure that a proper set of checks and balances are upheld so that our young generation, and \nthe people of Mauritius do not feel threaten by a single police force. Those checks and \nbalances were indeed specified in our Constitution at that time to ensure that the \nconstitutional powers are granted to the DPP in all matters of prosecution.  \nMadam Speaker, to preserve the integrity of our institution, it is not a good practice for \nthe Commissioner of Police to initiate private prosecution and to bypass the constitutional \nprerogatives of the DPP in prosecution matters when in fact both institutions were intended to \ncollaborate and avoid conflict to meet the end of justice in our democratic society.  \nMadam Speaker, it is highly essential to bring clarity and delimit the respective powers \nof the DPP and those of the Commissioner of Police with regards to a defendant or detainee \nwho has been provisionally charged and is awaiting on bail. Both the police and the office of \nthe DPP are meant to be highly trusted important institutions of our democratic society where \nthey must work together, play their independent roles and implement their powers for good \ngovernance and for proper administration of justice, and cannot have any conflict whatsoever \nas they carry hopes and expectations of the people for peace and justice.  \nMadam Speaker, the public has entrusted this Government to restore the independence \nof the public institutions and further, to foster ethics and integrity in all walks of life, to \nenhance our fundamental rights and for the DPP to prosecute offenders in the name and on \nbehalf of the State. Under the Bail Act, it is the police who has the power to object for the \nrelease of a defendant or detainee when a provisional charge is raised. The grants of objection \nraised by the police must be carefully analysed and based on the nature of the evidence \ngathered to ensure that he does not violate the rights of that person established in our \nConstitution.  \nThe office of the DPP has the expertise and is fully equipped with trained and \nexperienced lawyers in the field to analyse the nature of the evidence gathered by the police \nin each and every case, and to conclude whether or not an objection for release of a defendant \nor detainee should be raised. Each and every case, must be based on its evidence and on its \nown merits and own facts.  \nMadam Speaker, the new section 3B introduced in this Bill under section 4 of the Act, \nrightly makes it clear that where the Commissioner of Police has the intention to object for \n\n107 \n \nthe release of a defendant or detainee provisionally charged, he shall seek the advice of the \nDPP under the new law and the decision to object shall rest solely on the DPP. \nMadam Speaker, where the court has heard an application for the release on bail after \nanalysing the grounds of objection raised by the police where the court concludes and orders \nthat the release on bail of a defendant or detainee, in such circumstances, section 6 of the Bill \nintroduces a new section 4A that is to be inserted in the principal Bail Act. And, again, makes \nit very clear that the power to apply to the Supreme Court for an order to set aside the \ndecision of the magistrate to release the defendant or detainee on bail shall rest, again, solely \non the DPP.  \nMadam Speaker, to conclude, as our Prime Minister says, we have a difficult task ahead \nbut with this team holding experience, competence and determination; we are confident that \nwe shall overcome all the difficulties in building our nation and to ensure that a proper \nadministration of justice is established to meet the ideals of the rule of law. \nMadam Speaker, I welcome and support the amendments to the Bail Act introduced by \nthe hon. Acting Attorney General as these clarify the powers and integrity of both \ninstitutions. \nI thank you all for your attention and commitment for a better Mauritius.  \nANNOUNCEMENT \nNATIONAL ASSEMBLY - USE OF KREOL MORISIEN - STANDING ORDER 5 \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, after having ruled out Junior Minister, hon. Ms \nBérenger, I would like to refer the House to Standing Order 5 so that you understand why I \nhad to take this stand. It is nothing personal, of course, and everybody knows my personal \nstand on the issue of introducing Creole in the National Assembly. It is not just a question of \ntechnique or technicity. \nStanding Order 5 says – \n“The proceedings and debates of the Assembly shall be in the English language, but a \nMember may address the Assembly in French.” \nI do not think there is any doubt on the fact that this is the way that is it for the moment. \n\n108 \n \nHon. Prime Minister, may I seize this opportunity to tell you that maybe you can think \nabout whether we should not have a Select Committee on the question of introducing Creole \nin the Assembly.  \nI have no doubt that most Members will probably support this, but there are things to be \ndiscussed including the amendment of the Standing Orders and, as we told the House the \nother day, now we have lots of committees including the Standing Orders Committee, which \nwill have to sit and maybe amongst the issues to be discussed will be the issue of language. \nIf you wish to start again, Ms J. Bérenger, you may do so now, but I will respect your \nchoice.  \nOkay! Hon. Ramdass! \n(5.55 p.m.) \nMr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle): Merci, \nMadame la présidente.  \nMadame la présidente, d’abord permettez-moi de commencer par saluer tout bas et \nremercier l’honorable Attorney General ainsi que l’honorable ministre des Terres et du \nlogement pour avoir présenté en toute urgence à l’Assemblée ce projet de loi. Un projet de loi \nqui traite la question des limites du pouvoir du Directeur des poursuites publiques d’une part, \net des pouvoirs du Commissaire de police de l’autre, quant au droit fondamental à la liberté \nde l’individu et, cela, dans le contexte spécifique du Bail Act.  \nMadame la présidente, la gravité de cette question et l’urgence de la situation se \nreflètent précisément dans la crise institutionnelle dont faisait face notre démocratie sous le \nprécédent gouvernement. Effectivement, c’était bien une première pour notre pays de voir \ndeux institutions constitutionnelles clés de notre système de justice, notamment, le Directeur \ndes poursuites publiques et le Commissaire de police impliquées dans une bataille juridique \nsans précédent. Une bataille juridique effectivement sans précédent sur la limite de leurs \npouvoirs, de leurs attributs respectifs et, cela en ce qui concerne la remise en liberté d’un \nsuspect en attendant l’issue d’une enquête.  \nCette bataille juridique, Madame la présidente, a, dites-vous bien, coûté pas moins de R \n14 millions à l’État mauricien. Il y a quelques semaines de cela, nous avons entendu la \nréponse du Premier ministre suite à une question qui lui avait été posée par rapport aux \ndépenses encourues en termes des frais légaux et des conseils juridiques retenus par l’ancien \n\n109 \n \nCommissaire de police et nous avons appris que la somme de R 14 millions a été dépensée \npour cette bataille juridique. Il est malheureux, Madame la présidente, que le peuple \nmauricien fasse le frais d’une question d’ego de la part de l’ancien Commissaire de police, \ncelui qui agissait, selon toute évidence, clairement sur les instructions de Lakwizinn. \nEt, rappelons-le, Madame la présidente, la source même de cette tension institutionnelle \nétait la décision du bureau du Directeur des poursuites publiques de ne pas soutenir mais \nsurtout ou plutôt, de se poser à une contestation du Commissaire de police, de l’ordre de la \ncour, autorisant la remise en liberté conditionnelle des plusieurs individus dont, M. Bruneau \nLaurette, Maître Akil Bissessur, Sherry Singh, Vimen Sabapati, entre autres. Et, nous avons \npar la suite appris, Madame la présidente, que les charges provisoires pesant sur plusieurs de \nces personnes dont je viens de vous citer, ont été purement et simplement rayées. Nous avons \naussi appris qu’un ancien membre de la force policière, une certaine WPC Goomany, avait \npris le devant, il n’y a pas longtemps, pour rapporter un cas possible de planting of evidence \ndans le cas de Vimen Sabapati. \nImaginons, Madame la présidente, ces nouveaux faits, en fait, nous poussent à nous \ninterroger si cela aurait fait honneur à notre système de justice et à notre identité comme une \ndémocratie, si ces personnes avaient été reconduites en cellule policière, si ces personnes \navaient été privées de leur liberté, si le DPP avait capitulé sous l’insistance du Commissaire \nde police d’alors de continuer à objecter à leur remise en liberté.  \nMadam Speaker, this Bill could not have been presented to this Assembly at a more \nappropriate time. In fact, it addresses a core issue; an issue that strikes at the very heart of our \ndemocratic values and the rule of law. It relates, in fact, to the importance of giving to the \nDirector of Public Prosecutions, the DPP, clear and unfettered powers to prosecute and also \nwith a view to promote the sacrosanct principle of the presumption of innocence in criminal \nproceedings. In order to properly understand the importance of this Bill, Madame la \nprésidente, we must first examine the constitutional provisions, its historical context, and its \npresent implications. One must understand, Madam Speaker, that the independence of the \nDPP is not only vital for justice but it is crucial for the very survival of our democratic \ninstitutions. The role of the DPP in Mauritius, as set out under section 72 of our Constitution, \nconfers upon him the power to initiate control and discontinue criminal proceedings. \nNow, Madam Speaker, with the adoption of the present Bail Act back in the year 1999, \nthe presumption in favour of bail was given a statutory footing under section 3 of the Act. In \n\n110 \n \nfact, section 3 provided that every defendant or detainee shall be entitled to be released on \nbail subject to section 4, and section 4 of the Act provided exhaustively the grounds on which \na Court may refuse to release on bail a defendant or a detainee. \nNow, one major shortcoming in the Act, which is precisely what is sought to be curbed, \nwhat is sought to be corrected under the present amendment, was that it did not clearly \nspecify which entity between the Commissioner of Police and that of the DPP was vested \nwith clear powers to decide whether or not to object to the release on bail of a defendant or \ndetainee. And quite regrettably, Madam Speaker, this important shortcoming allowed for a \ntension to creep into the rapport between the Commissioner of Police and the Director of \nPublic Prosecutions, as section 4, subsection 4 of the Act referred fleetingly to an objection to \nbail formulated either by the Commissioner of Police or the Director of Public Prosecutions. \nBut it did not, unfortunately, cater for any situation where there is a conflict, there is a \ndivergence of opinion between those two posts as to whether or not a defendant or detainee \nought to be released on bail. Et bien évidemment, Madame la présidente, cette incertitude, \ncette lacune dans nos lois a été utilisée tout naturellement par le MSM, fidèle à son habitude, \nà travers l’ancien commissaire de police, à des fins politiques, afin de satisfaire un agenda \npolitique et dans l’unique but de persécuter ses adversaires politiques. \nIn fact, when a political party controls the prosecution process, Madam Speaker, there \nis danger. There is danger: danger that the justice system will be used as a tool for retribution; \ndanger of a loss of trust in the legal system, leading to an erosion of our democratic values. \nAnd it is precisely the mandate of this newly elected Government, Madam Speaker, to \nconsolidate our constitutional and democratic values already embodied in our Government \nProgramme. Justice cannot, Madam Speaker, be impartial if those in power can manipulate it \nfor their own political advantage, and this is, in fact, precisely why an independent judiciary, \nand by extension, an independent Director of Public Prosecutions is essential for the \nprotection of human rights and the rule of law. \nThis Bill, Madam Speaker, provides that where the Commissioner of Police intends to \nobject to the release of bail of a defendant or detainee, he will now be under an obligation to \nseek the legal advice of the Director of Public Prosecutions and will be bound by such advice \nand decision of the DPP. And by adopting this mechanism, Madam Speaker, the Bail \n(Amendment) Bill seeks to grant a prerogative to the DPP who, unlike the Commissioner of \nPolice, is always required to be a person with legal training and experience as a barrister in \norder to be eligible for the post. In fact, a legal background, in my very humble view, Madam \n\n111 \n \nSpeaker, is essential to enable the decision maker, the DPP, to assess whether the exceptions \nto bail, as set out under section 4 of the Act, can be invoked and whether such motion has a \nreasonable prospect of success. And this, undoubtedly, Madam Speaker, allows for an \nefficient allocation of resources and to present before the Court only meritorious cases for a \nlawful restriction of a person’s freedom of movement.  It is also apposite to recall that the \nDPP is required, Madam Speaker, to act fairly and impartially in presenting a case and it is \nnot the role of the DPP to secure a conviction at all costs.  \nIn my humble view, Madam Speaker, in fact, he is a disinterested party insofar as a \ndefendant or a detainee is concerned. Lastly, Madam Speaker, the DPP’s security of tenure is \nakin to that of a Supreme Court Judge, reinforcing the very notion that justice cannot and \nshould not be influenced by political or external pressures. \nMadame la présidente, je faillirais à mon devoir si je ne profitais pas de cette occasion \nqui m’est accordée aujourd’hui pour exprimer quand même une certaine crainte ; une certaine \ncrainte par rapport à l’application d’un aspect de ce Bail (Amendement Act). Cette loi, \nMadame la présidente, si elle est votée, si elle est promulguée - et elle le sera certainement - \npose quand même une certaine difficulté. Donc, j’ai une crainte. Si elle est votée, elle aura \npour conséquence qu’il y aura un nombre grandissant de dossiers qui seront référés au bureau \ndu Directeur des poursuites publiques. Et là, nous avons probablement une difficulté, dans la \nmesure où il est impératif que ces dossiers soient traités, soit étudiés de manière rapide et \ndiligente, puisqu’il y va de la liberté de l’individu ; il y va de la liberté du citoyen mauricien. \nDonc, il est impératif, Madam Speaker, que nous ne nous retrouvions pas dans une \nsituation – et là, je parle un peu sous la correction de mes confrères et consœurs ici présents, \ndont vous-même, Madame la présidente – où nous sommes en cour, ayant à faire face à des \ndemandes répétitives de renvoi de la part du représentant de la poursuite sous prétexte que the \nstand of the DPP is not ready. On ne le souhaiterait pas. C’est une phrase que nous entendons \nsouvent en cour nécessairement, n’est-ce pas, Madam Speaker. Donc, je souhaite que le \nbureau du Directeur des poursuites publiques fasse des arrangements nécessaires afin qu’une \néquipe soit dédiée justement pour traiter ces dossiers en toute urgence et avec diligence \npuisque, comme je l’ai dit, il y va de la liberté du citoyen mauricien. \nEn guise de conclusion, Madam Speaker, if we agree that the power of prosecute must \nrest with an independent Director of Public Prosecutions as the principle is enshrined under \nsection 72 of our Constitution, it logically follows that we should also agree that the power to \n\n112 \n \nobject or not to object to the release on bail of a defendant also rests with an independent \nDirector of Public Prosecutions. And this is precisely what the Bill brings about, and this is \nprecisely why I am supporting this Bill. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you for respecting the time.  \nHon. Prime Minister! \n(6.05 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, recent times have seen an unprecedented, I \nshould also say unfortunate conflict between the Commissioner of Police and the Director of \nPublic Prosecutions in matters relating to bail. Of relevance, as hon. Baboolall mentioned, is \nthe case of the Commissioner of Police against Mr Akil Bissessur and others. The police \nobjected to bail in that case for Mr Bissessur, but the Office of the DPP representing the \nCommissioner of Police had no objection. That should have been the end of the matter, but, \nin spite of this, the representative of the police, in Court, made a statement to state that the \nstand of this Commissioner of Police was to object to bail in the present case in spite of what \nthe DPP had said and went further to say that if need be, the Office of the Commissioner of \nPolice will solicit help from outside of the DPP’s Office. In fact, the Commissioner of Police \nhired the services of counsel from the Bar to represent the police and entered a case before \nthe Supreme Court to quash the decision of the District Magistrate. \nThe Supreme Court refused to intervene in the matter pursuant to section 82(1) of the \nConstitution. As I have said, Madam Speaker, this is unprecedented. I think hon. Baboolall \nput his finger on it. It should never have happened; we should not have had the Bill today. \nWorse, Madam Speaker, public funds had to be dished out to various lawyers, which was \ntotally unnecessary. Waste of public funds; dishing out money to lawyers chosen by the \nCommissioner of Police, probably in cohort with the Prime Minister, and we do not have to \nguess who were the lawyers and how they were chosen! \nFrom August 2021 to November 2024, the CP has retained the services of five counsels \nfor eight cases, including one King’s Counsel and one attorney – we all know who the \nattorney is. The cost to the State, as hon. Ramdass just said, is over Rs14 m. Over Rs14 m.! \nThe only objective was to undermine the professional integrity of the Office of the Director \nof Public Prosecutions – a post which is constitutional. This situation arose because as per the \nthen provisions of the Bail Act, namely section 4 (4) of the Bail Act – \n\n113 \n \nSection 4 \n“(4) \n(a) \nWhere a Magistrate has ordered the release on bail of a defendant or [a \ndetainee notwithstanding an objection by the Commissioner of Police or the Director of \nPublic Prosecutions on any of the grounds set out in this section], the Commissioner of \nPolice or the Director of Public Prosecutions; [as the case may be], may, within 7 days \nof the determination of the Magistrate, apply to the Supreme Court for an order setting \naside the decision of the Magistrate [to release the defendant or detainee].” \nConflicts of such nature between law enforcement authorities undermine public \nconfidence in our institutions and must never be allowed to happen again. Such conflicts \ncould also be due because nobody in their right mind thought that this could happen. This is \nwhy we have to come with this amendment to the Bill, to make it clear what are the \nprovisions of the new Bail Act, especially in cases where bail is objected to or in cases where \na decision to grant bail is challenged. \nIn order to avoid such situations from recurring, through the Amendment Bill that is \nbeing brought to the House, we want to make it absolutely clear what are the powers of the \nDirector of Public Prosecutions and what are those of the Commissioner of Police.  \nFirst of all, we have to make it crystal clear what we mean by detainee, the definition of \na detainee. Under the current law – \n“\"detainee\" means a person who is under arrest upon reasonable suspicion of having \ncommitted an offence;” \nFrom what we see now, “reasonable suspicion” leaves room for interpretation, and it is \na wide definition. Under this Amendment Bill, in order not to leave any room for doubt as \nwho is concerned by the provisions of this Act, a detainee is defined as – \n“\"detainee\" means a person who is under arrest and is provisionally charged before a \nCourt;” \nThe ambiguity of the law, as it is, requires more clarity. This is why, now, with this Bill \n– \n“5.  \nSection 4 of principal Act amended \n\n114 \n \n(3) \n where an application for release on bail of a defendant or a detainee is \nrefused, the Court shall place on record the written reasons for its determination.” \n Additionally, the Bill provides for a situation of conflicts in relation to the release on \nbail of a defendant or a detainee. Accordingly, the sole discretion not to object to bail would \nbe that of the Commissioner of Police. However, where the Commissioner of Police has the \nintention to object to the release on bail of a defendant or a detainee, he shall seek the advice \nof the Director of Public Prosecutions, and the decision not to object or not will rest solely \nwith the Director of Public Prosecutions. \nMore importantly, Madam Speaker, the law as it currently stands, provides that when a \nmagistrate has ordered the release on bail of a defendant or a detainee, both the \nCommissioner of Police and the Director of Public Prosecutions have the power to challenge \nthe decision before the Supreme Court. That shall no longer be the case. The Bill provides \nthat the power to challenge such decision before the Supreme Court shall henceforth rest \nsolely with the Director of Public Prosecutions. Nothing to do with the Commissioner of \nPolice! \nThe Bail (Amendment) Bill, therefore, will give greater clarity and unambiguity to the \nrespective powers of the CP and the DPP in relation to bail. This amendment, Madam \nSpeaker, to the Bail Act makes it clear what are the powers of the CP and what are the powers \nof the DPP in relation to bail.  \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much. You will probably be in time for Iftar, I \nsuppose. \nMr Mohamed: Yes, there is time. \n(6.13 p.m.) \nMadam Speaker, thank you very much. I would like to thank all those who have \nparticipated in this debate.  \nAgain, what we have heard is the importance of democracy; what we have heard is \nliberty, and we have also heard about ‘gel’! But all this with the whole idea of what we have \nto do away with! In God’s name, thank God, we did away with them! We are now fighting, \nstruggling and working together as one country, as one people, in order to restore democracy. \n\n115 \n \nLet me also, at this juncture, state the following: it is quite interesting how things \nchange in life, and so fast! Only a few years back, I recall, since I am a barrister by \nprofession, I was involved in a case that is being dealt with – so, there is no issue of conflict –\n, I am sure that the then accused would not mind me saying his name today. It was Bruneau \nLaurette. I remember when I was in Court appearing for him to move for bail, all those \nsections of the law that we have seen, how it has been abused of by the then Commissioner of \nPolice, came up.  \nWe won bail in spite of it being a very difficult task. I recall how in those days, there \nwas fake democracy, as a hon. Member said. Why do I say that? Because when we won bail, \nthe Commissioner of Police issued a communiqué. That was on 28 February 2023. For all to \nremember, in that communiqué, the Commissioner of Police said the following – \n“The decision of the Office of the DPP therefore creates an ‘evil precedent’.” \nThat ‘evil precedent’ that the then Commissioner of Police was referring to was the \ndecision of the Office of the DPP, after having looked at the ruling of learned magistrate, \ndecided that he will not object to the release. The Commissioner of Police, for the first time \nin history, for the first time ever since we had our Constitution, our independence, went as far \nas to say it was an ‘evil precedent.’ To add insult to injury, what did the then Prime Minister \ndo? He made a declaration and he said – \n“Mafia finn infiltre ban institision sa pei la.” \nThe GIS published the communiqué of the Commissioner of Police. The GIS does not \npublish the communiqué of a Commissioner of Police! The GIS publishes the work of \nGovernment – the Executive! So, there had disappeared the respect one must have for \ninstitutions, where the Commissioner of Police had himself felt that he was part of the \nGovernment Ministers! He was a little department in the Office of the Prime Minister \nwhereby whatever he said had to be aligned with what the then Prime Minister wanted, and \nhad to be published by the GIS! \nThose days are over! When hon. Mrs Leu-Govind said, ‘let Mauritius be Mauritius \nagain’, how right she is! This is what we are standing up to fight for. So, this is a very \nimportant date for democracy. I said it last time when I intervened, I say it again: it is a pity \nthat the Leader of the Opposition is not present here. His position, his role and his \nresponsibility are in the Constitution. It is not only for him to earn his packet at the end of the \nmonth! It is for him to be here and to be the voice of the people! \n\n116 \n \nBut then, not only is he not here, they will also not be at the Municipal Elections! Then, \nagain, as I said, things change very rapidly! I will say to the Almighty: thank God, we are \nnow coming on the right path.  \nSo, these are my words, Madam Speaker. I do commend this Bill to the House. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nQuestion put and agreed to.  \nBill read a second time and committed. \nMadam Speaker: You are not going to miss Iftar. \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(Madam Speaker in the Chair) \nThe Bail (Amendment) Bill (No. III of 2025) was considered and agreed to. \nOn the Assembly resuming with Madam Speaker in the Chair, Madam Speaker reported \naccordingly. \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Bail (Amendment) Bill (No. III of 2025) was read a \nthird time and passed. \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Tuesday 08 April 2025 at 11.30 a.m. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned. \nAt 6.21 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 08 April 2025 at \n11.30 a.m. \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nRODRIGUES – PORT MATHURIN PORT MASTER PLAN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/237",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 237,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning – PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS PAGE 13 of 21 Parliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "question": "(No. B/237) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the Financial \nServices \nCommission/Organisation \nfor \nEconomic \nCo-operation \nand \nDevelopment \n(FSC/OECD) Regional Centre of Excellence, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to the – \n(a) \nbackground, objectives and mandate thereof;  \n(b) \nspecific achievements made under each of its objectives to date;  \n(c) \nannual expenditure of the Centre, and  \n(d) \nkey performance indicators put in place to ensure that public funds are utilised \nefficiently, and  \n(e) \nthe term/duration of the Memorandum of Understanding between the \nFSC/OECD.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPLAINE MAGNIEN – SHELTERED FARMING PARK – BENEFICIARIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/238",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 238,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/238) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to sheltered farming park at Plaine Magnien, he will state and table a list of the \nbeneficiaries thereof, indicating – \n(a) \nif all the units have been leased and are under cultivation, and  \n(b) \namount of rent due, if any, by each beneficiary and, if so, further indicate if \nconsideration will be given for the re-allocation thereof in case of default.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBEAU CHAMP, BEL AIR, PONT LARDIER & CAROLINE – BYPASS ROAD \nPROJECT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/239",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 239,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/239) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the villages of Beau \nChamp, Bel Air, Pont Lardier and Caroline, he will state if his Ministry is in presence of any \nproject and/or feasibility study recommending the construction of a bypass road from these \nvillages leading to the Flacq Hospital and if so, give details thereof.  \n\n124",
      "answer": "Reply: As part of its National Road Strategy Network, the Road Development \nAuthority (RDA) intends to implement the Motorway M4 project which aims to improve \nconnectivity between the northern part of the island and the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam \nInternational Airport through a new link, while fostering economic growth in the eastern \nregion and alleviating traffic congestion on the existing road network. \nThe Motorway M4 project will consist of a dual carriageway of approximately 50 km, \nstarting at Forbach on Motorway M2, passing through several villages, namely Poudre d’Or \nHamlet, Plaines des Roches, Laventure, Pont Blanc, Bonne Mère, Queen Victoria, \nClemencia, Olivia, and Ferney, including Beau Champ, Bel Air, Pont Lardier and Caroline, \nending at Grand Bel Air. \nThe project will be implemented in three phases, namely –  \n(i) \nPhase 1– Forbach to Pont Blanc; \n(ii) \nPhase 2 – Pont Blanc to Bel Air, and \n(iii) Phase 3 – Bel Air to Grand Bel Air. \n \nIn the first instance, the Road Development Authority (RDA) will consider the \nimplementation of phases 1 and 2 of the proposed Motorway M4 project starting from \nForbach to Bel Air on the B27 Road, over a length of 30 km. I am discussing with the \nMinistry of Finance to consider this project, or at least a segment of the project, as a priority \nin the next Financial Year.  \nI wish to highlight that a feasibility study for the Motorway M4 project was conducted \nin August 2012 by Luxconsult (Mauritius) Ltd, in association with LEA Associates South \nAsia PVT Ltd and P D Naidoo & Associates. The study, which was initially undertaken for \nthe then East Coast Trunk Road – Dual Carriageway from Bel Air to Forbach, now referred \nas the Motorway M4 project, concluded that the project is viable. \nGiven that the eastern part of the island is currently connected to the airport and \nsurrounding regions through arterial roads only, these roads pass through built-up areas and \ndifficult terrains causing considerable time travel delays. Moreover, the development of smart \ncities and other infrastructural projects in the eastern region has increased the traffic load on \nthe existing arterial road network. Considering that the traffic situation in the region has \nworsened over the years along the project corridor, the recommendations outlined in the \nfeasibility report are maintained. \nAs I mentioned earlier, the Motorway M4 will bypass several villages, including Beau \nChamp, Bel Air, Pont Lardier, and Caroline, and will cross the B23 Road near the New Flacq \n\n125 \n \nHospital, thereby improving access to the hospital. Upon completion of the project, the RDA \nwill assess and consider the need for providing a direct link from the Motorway M4 to the \nhospital. \nNATIONAL PENSION APPEAL TRIBUNAL –APPEAL PROTOCOL REVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/240",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 240,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/240) Mrs A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \nwhether, in regard to the National Pension Appeal Tribunal, he will state – \n(a) \nthe number of pending cases thereat;  \n(b) \nthe timeframe for the hearing and disposal of an appeal;  \n(c) \nthe assistance provided to appellants, if any, and  \n(d) \nif he will consider reviewing the actual protocol for a more humane approach \nwhen dealing with and determining such cases thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBEL AIR – DEPLORABLE ROADS – REMEDIAL WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/241",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 241,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/241) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the Père Dorbec Road and \nChemin Kamilaye in Bel Air, he will state if he has been made aware of the deplorable state \nthereof and, if so, indicate – \n(a)  when remedial works will be carried out thereat, and  \n(b)  the expected completion date thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: Pipe replacement works are being carried out along Railway Road, Damree \nRoad, Dorbec Road and its laterals in the region of Bel Air, Flacq by the Central Water \nAuthority.  \nIt is expected that permanent road reinstatement will be undertaken by the Central \nWater Authority’s contractor as from the second week of April 2025 and would be completed \nin one week’s time.  \nWith regard to Kalimaye Road, ten pits were excavated for reparation works and \nconnection of new water supply by the Central Water Authority.  \n\n126 \n \nReinstatement works would be undertaken by the Central Water Authority’s contractor \nand works are expected to start by end of March 2025. Same will be completed by the first \nweek of April 2025. \n \nRING ROAD PROJECT, PHASE 2 & 3 – IMPLEMENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/242",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 242,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/242) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to Phases 2 and 3 of \nthe Ring Road Project, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Road \nDevelopment Authority, information as to whether consideration will be given for the \nimplementation thereof and, if so, when and if not, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPOSTE DE FLACQ REGION – FLOODING ISSUES – MITIGATION PLAN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/243",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 243,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/243) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the recurring flooding issues in Poste \nde Flacq and surrounding area and the subsequent site visit effected by Officers of the Land \nDrainage Authority on Wednesday 5 February 2025, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain information as to where matters stand as to the proposed mitigation actions plan to be \nimplemented thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRENEWABLE ENERGY HYBRID FACILITIES PROJECT – PPA – BREACH & \nDAMAGES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/244",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 244,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/244) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the renewable energy \nhybrid facilities projects by SPV 30MV Belle Vue 2 Ltd., and SPV 30MV Belle Vue 3 Ltd., \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Electricity Board, information as \nto – \n(a) \nwhether the projects are in breach of the provisions of the Power Purchase \nAgreement signed therefor, indicating if the dates for their coming into \noperation have been respected, and \n(b) \nthe total amount of damages, if any, paid to the Board.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/214) \n\n127 \n \nRESIDENCES CITÉ LA CHAUX – STATE LAND – LEASEHOLDERS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/245",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 245,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/245) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to State land at Residences Cité \nLa Chaux, he will state the number of leaseholders thereof, indicating the mechanism, if any, \nput in place at the Ministry to regularise these leases and/or if consideration will be given to \namending the law to make the lessees owners of their lands.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nQUATRE BORNES – PAVILLON FOOTBALL PLAYGROUND – UPGRADING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/246",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 246,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/246) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Pavillon Football \nplayground in Quatre Bornes, he will state if consideration will be given to – \n(a)  improve the lighting thereof;  \n(b)  replace the defective fencing, and  \n(c)  fix the rocky surface thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCWA – PIPE LAYING PROJECT – CONTRACTORS & FUNDS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/247",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 247,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/247) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the pipe laying project across the \nisland, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, \ninformation as to the amount of funds disbursed therefor, indicating – \n(a)  if the project was carried out by contractors or in-house workers;  \n(b)  where works have not yet been completed, and  \n(c)  the reasons why the pipes were not buried at the depth of 900mm as per \nspecifications.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSTRAY DOGS – RISING POPULATION – REMEDIAL ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/248",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 248,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/248) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nwhether, in regard to stray dogs, he will state if he has been made aware of the increasing \n\n128 \n \nnumber thereof over the past years and, if so, indicate the remedial actions being envisaged in \nrelation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nLAND DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN – PUBLICATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/249",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 249,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/249) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the Land \nDrainage Master Plan, he will state where matters stand as to the proposition to making the \ndocument public.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAHEBOURG, HARRY LATOUR STADIUM – RENOVATION WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/250",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 250,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/250) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the renovation works being \ncarried out at the Harry Latour Stadium at Mahebourg, he will state where matters stand, \nindicating the terms and conditions of the contract awarded therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nCOP30 – NDC 3.0 – CONSULTATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/251",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 251,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/251) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister \nof Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in regard to the \nNationally Determined Contribution (NDC) 3.0 update for the forthcoming COP30, he will \nstate where matters stand, indicating – \n(a)  if consultations have been held thereon with the community at large; \n(b)  the financing mechanisms and strategies put in place therefor, and  \n(c) \nthe outcomes of the previous NDC.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nST MARTIN, PIG FARMS – LEASES – PRODUCTION YIELD & INSPECTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/252",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 252,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/252) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nMinister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to \nthe pig farms set up by the Ministry at St Martin, he will state the – \n(a) \nnumber of pig farmers granted leases thereat; \n\n129 \n \n(b) \nproduction/yield compared to the optimal production capacity for the land \ndeployed thereat for pig farming; \n(c) \nfrequency at which inspection is carried out thereat and the reports produced, and  \n(d) \nnumber of applications received for lease of land to operate pig farms at St Martin \nover the last five years, indicating the number thereof – \n(i) \napproved and land allocated therefor, and  \n(ii)  turned down and the reasons therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nPUBLIC SERVICE EXCELLENCE AWARD – OBJECTIVES & ELIGIBILITY \nCRITERIA",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/253",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 253,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Education and Human Resource – \n \nWhether, in regard to the \"kreol Rodrige\", he will state when same will be \nintroduced in secondary schools in Rodrigues, indicating the (a) measures \nbeing taken for the implementation thereof and (b) grades concerned \ntherewith?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/254",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 254,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms",
      "question": "(No. B/254) Ms R. M. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nPublic Service and Administrative Reforms whether, in regard to the Public Service \nExcellence Award, she will state the – \n (a) objectives thereof; \n (b)  eligibility criteria to participate therein, and \n (c)  scope of participation for public officers in Rodrigues.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nTAXI OPERATORS WELFARE FUND – FUNDS COLLECTED & EXPENSES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/255",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 255,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/255) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Taxi Operators Welfare Fund, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe amount of funds collected and expenses incurred therefrom since its \nimplementation to date; \n(b) \n if consideration will be given to amending the relevant legislation to render \ncontribution thereto optional, and \n(c) \n if a proper medical scheme has been designed for taxi operators registered \nthereunder.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPESTICIDES – USAGE MECHANISM & SENSITISATION CAMPAIGN \n\n130",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/256",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 256,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/256) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nHealth and Wellness whether, in regard to pesticides, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Dangerous Chemicals Control Board, information as to the – \n(a) \nmechanisms put in place to monitor the use and handling thereof, indicating the \nstatistics provided by licensed companies thereon; \n(b) \nsensitisation campaigns held and/or proposed to be held on the use thereof in \nRodrigues, and \n(c) \nnames of the representatives from Rodrigues on the Board.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nPBAT – HEADMASTER & DEPUTY HEADMASTER – APPOINTMENT CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/257",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 257,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine) PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS PAGE 18 of 21 Parliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/257) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked \nMinister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to cases referred to the Public \nBodies Appeal Tribunal regarding the appointment of officers to the grades of Headmaster \nand Deputy Headmaster since 2019 to 2021 and after the final determination of the Tribunal \nconfirming their substantive appointment, he will state if a High-Powered Committee was set \nup to that effect and, if so, indicate the recommendations made by the Committee regarding \npayment of gratuity and pension benefits for all those officers who retired before the final \ndetermination of the Tribunal.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nDRUG ADDICTS – REHABILITATION & TREATMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/258",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 258,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/258) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the rehabilitation of drug addicts, \nhe will state the – \n(a) \nprotocols put in place therefor, indicating the treatments administered; \n(b) \namount of funds spent by Government on such programs over the past three \nyears, indicating if any survey has been carried out to assess the effectiveness \nthereof, and \n(c) \nnumber of drug addicts salvaged from this scourge over the past ten years, \nindicating the number of cases of overdose recorded due to drug abuse.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCHIKUNGUNYA – REPORTED CASES \n\n131",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/259",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 259,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/259) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to Chikungunya, he will state the number \nof suspected cases thereof, since January 2025 to date, reported – \n(a) \nat public hospitals, community health centres and mediclinics, and \n(b) \nby private medical practitioners, indicating the number of positive cases thereof \nidentified.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 13 – HOUSING UNITS – DISMANTLING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/260",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 260,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/260) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change \nwhether, in regard to the housing units containing asbestos, he will state the number thereof \nidentified in Constituency No. 13, Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac, indicating the – \n(a) \nexpected timeframe for the dismantling thereof, and \n(b) \nredeployment plan, if any, devised therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCHIKUNGUNYA – REPORTED CASES (JAN-MARCH 2025)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/261",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 261,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/261) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to Chikungunya, he \nwill state the number of reported cases thereof since January 2025 to date, indicating the \nmeasures being taken to control same.",
      "answer": "Reply: Presently, there are three confirmed local cases of Chikungunya.  Two of the \ncases were notified to the Ministry by a private clinic and one was detected at Dr. Yves \nCantin Community Hospital. \nIt is worth mentioning that no local cases of Chikungunya had been reported in \nMauritius since 2006, although some sporadic imported cases were recorded over the last \nthree years.  In 2024, two imported cases were recorded. \nImmediately upon being notified of the first case on 15 March 2025, the following \nmeasures were taken by the Ministry – \n\n132 \n \n(i) \nactivation of the Operational Plan for the Prevention and Control of \nChikungunya; \n(ii) \nvector survey and control activities, including mist blowing, larviciding and \nfogging operations were initiated and are ongoing to minimise the risk of \ntransmission to the population; \n(iii) \nfever surveys and contact tracing exercises are being conducted on a daily basis \nin areas surrounding the positive cases; \n(iv) \nan inter-sectoral meeting was held on 17 March 2025 which was attended by the \nrepresentatives of the World Health Organisation, Ministry of Environment, \nSolid Waste Management and Climate Change and Ministry of Local \nGovernment and relevant units of the Ministry.  All stakeholders were requested \nto collaborate and engage fully in the prevention and precautionary measures to \nprevent further transmission of Chikungunya in the affected localities; \n(v) \ndaily monitoring and epidemiological surveillance are ongoing at the level of all \nhealthcare facilities (public and private); \n(vi) \nsensitisation is being carried out in the press and on TV and Radio, and \n(vii) \na circular has been issued to both the public and private sector, including to the \nDepartmental Head Commission for Health, Rodrigues, to instruct on the \nprecautionary measures to be taken to increase vigilance concerning \nChikungunya for a standard approach for case management of positive cases \nand for investigation of all suspected cases. \nThe Ministry is monitoring the situation closely. \nBEL AIR – FOOTBALL PITCH – REMEDIAL WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/262",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 262,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/262) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the football pitch situated behind \nthe St Esprit Church in Bel Air, he will state if he has been made aware of the bad conditions \nthereof and of its surrounding walls and, if so, indicate – \n(a) \nwhen remedial works will be carried out, and \n(b) \nthe expected completion date thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nNTC – SPARE PARTS – PROCUREMENT EXERCISE  \n\n133",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/263",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 263,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/263) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the National Transport Corporation, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to the bidding exercises \nlaunched by the Corporation for the procurement and award of contracts for spare parts since \nJanuary 2023 to date, indicating – \n(a) \nthe names of the suppliers thereof, further indicating in each case the – \n(i) \ncontractual value thereof, and \n(ii) \namount paid to the suppliers, and \n(b) \nif he has been aware of any irregularities and/or malpractices regarding the \nprocurement thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSICOM LTD – PENSION FUNDS 2012-2024 – MISMANAGEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/264",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 264,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning – PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS PAGE 20 of 21 Parliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "question": "(No. B/264) Mr R. Jummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the \npension funds managed by the State Insurance Company of Mauritius Ltd., she will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain therefrom information as to – \n(a) \nthe status of the funds since 2014 to 2024, indicating the qualifications and \nbenefits drawn by those managing same, and \n(b) \nwhether any case of mismanagement has been reported in relation thereto and, \nif so, the remedial actions taken thereon.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPUBLIC SERVICE VEHICLE (TAXI) LICENSE – HOTEL-BASED OPERATORS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/265",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 265,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/265) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Public Service Vehicle (Taxi) Licence \nwith hotels as base of operation issued over the past ten years, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information as to the number \nthereof, indicating – \n(a) \nthe procedures followed for the allocation thereof, and  \n(b) \nif all applicants complied with the required criteria in terms of – \n(i) \ncharacter certificate test; \n(ii) \nage of applicant, and \n(iii) \nnumber of taxis per hotels. \n\n134",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIUS EEZ – FISHING LICENSES – FOREIGN COMPANIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/266",
      "sitting_id": "25-march-2025",
      "date": "2025-03-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 266,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/266) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of Mauritius, he will state – \n(a) \nthe number of – \n(i) \nfishing licenses awarded to foreign companies, indicating the \nconditions attached thereto, and \n(b) \nbilateral fisheries partnership agreements signed, indicating the – \n(i) \ncountries concerned therewith, and \n(ii) \nconditions attached thereto, and \n(c) \nwhere matters stand as to fish stocks taking in our sea.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/267",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 267,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/267) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nforthcoming publication of the Pay Research Bureau Report, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to where matters stand regarding the preparation thereof, \nindicating if same will be published as scheduled.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, as the House is aware, since 1982, the Pay \nResearch Bureau has conducted the general review exercise on pay and grading structures \nevery five years, except for 2016, where the report was published after a period of three \nyears. The 2016 PRB Report, however, re-established the periodicity of the general review \nexercise to five years, as it was before, and, consequently, the last one was in 2021. The next \nreport will, therefore, take effect on 01 January 2026.   \nI am informed, Madam Speaker, that the preparation for the next report started in \nMarch 2023 according to a pre-set work plan, and relevant information was gathered.  \nThese are impacting the Bureau’s calendar of activities because I found out that there \nwas some delay because they talked to the different ministries/departments, local authorities \nand also the Rodrigues Regional Assembly. There are 126 parastatal bodies that fall under the \npurview of the PRB. The Bureau has to gather the maximum information to facilitate the \ninteraction and exchange of views with all the stakeholders. \nSo far, the Bureau has had 578 meetings with Staff Associations and Management of \nboth Parastatal Bodies and Civil Service. 1,315 interviews have been conducted in relation to \njob description and 12 site visits have been effected to examine the alleged problem areas \nhighlighted by the stakeholders. \nAs a matter of fact, the officers of the Bureau are presently in Rodrigues holding \nconsultations with Unions and Management of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly. \nI have been informed, Madam Speaker, that the Bureau is facing several constraints, \nincluding delay from stakeholders to submit the relevant information. These are impacting \nthe Bureau’s planned calendar of activities. The publication date of the Report is now \nscheduled for December 2025. \n\n21 \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. \nPHOENIX – NEW POLICE STATION – CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/268",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 268,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/268) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the proposed \nconstruction of a new Police Station at Phoenix, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Commissioner of Police, information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMadam Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! Yes, \nDr. the hon. Ms Daureeawo! \nPRISONS & DETENTION CENTRES – HYGIENIC CONDITIONS – PRISONERS’ \nMEDICAL TREATMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/269",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 269,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/269) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to prisons and detention centres, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Prisons, information as to the – \n(a) \ncurrent hygienic conditions thereof, and  \n(b) \ntime taken to provide medical treatment and/or care to prisoners.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: I am informed, Madam Speaker, by the Acting Commissioner of \nPrisons that detainees are admitted to prisons either on remand or as convict following an \norder from the Court. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, the Prison Service is meant to ensure that \nhygienic conditions are maintained in all institutions. The measures taken include the \nprovision of personal toiletries, clothing and bedding as well as adequate toilet and bathroom \nfacilities. A laundry system for washing clothing and bedding is also put at their disposal. \nCleaning of cells and dormitories are performed by detainees under the supervision of Prison \nOfficers. \nFurthermore, the Prison Service undertakes routine maintenance and upgrading works. \nRegular pest control interventions are also conducted by trained Prison Officers. Additionally, \n\n22 \n \nfogging exercises are carried out by the personnel of the Ministry of Health and Wellness \nupon request.   \nInspections by the National Preventive Mechanism Division of the National Human \nRights Commission help to ensure the compliance with living standards.  \nMoreover, workplace hygiene is regulated in accordance with the Occupational Safety \nand Health Act. The Prison Service actively monitors cleanliness through designated Prison \nOfficers in each prison and also by visits by the Safety and Health Officer twice a week.  \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, the Prison Service operates three fully functional \nin-patient wards that are opened round the clock. They are located at the Melrose Prison, the \nCentral Prison, and the Women’s Prison at Beau Bassin. \nOther Institutions, namely Grand River North West Remand Prison, Petit Verger Prison, \nRichelieu Open Prison, and Phoenix Prison, have each a dispensary where medical treatment \nand primary care are dispensed during office hours from Monday to Saturday. During \nweekends, public holidays, and at night, Prison Health Service Officers from the Central \nPrison, Beau Bassin, attend these institutions in case of emergency. \nDetainees requiring medical care are attended to at the three in-patient wards and four \ndispensaries.  \nDetainees requiring further investigations or specialised care and treatment, are then \nreferred and admitted to Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital where two wards have been converted for \nmale and female detainees. These two wards offer a 24-hour in-patient service and are \nmanned by nursing and medical staff of the hospital. \nAn ambulance equipped with Basic Life Support devices is on stand-by mode at Beau \nBassin Prison for the transportation of persons who are not well from prisons to public \nhospitals. In addition, the services of the SAMU are solicited to attend to life-threatening \nemergencies for conveyance of the detainees to the nearest public hospital. \nAs regards part (c) of the question, Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Acting \nCommissioner of Prisons that the Prison Institutions are not overcrowded as they are \ncurrently occupied at 75.32% of their optimum capacity. \n \n \n\n23 \n \n᠎TELEVISION PROGRAMMES – MBC ACT & IBA ACT – AMENDMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/270",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 270,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/270) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to television \nprogrammes produced locally, he will state if Government will consider bringing \namendments to the – \n(a) \nMauritius Broadcasting Corporation Act with a view to ensuring that same are \nfair and impartial, and  \n(b) \nIndependent Broadcasting Authority Act to grant private operators the right to \nbroadcast same.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière, Mr \nQuirin! \nMBC – LOCAL & INTERNATIONAL SPORTING EVENTS – BROADCASTING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/271",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 271,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/271) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nbroadcasting of local and international sporting events, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Mauritius Broadcasting Corporation, information as to – \n(a) \nthe annual budget allocated therefor; \n(b) \nthe measures taken to secure the live transmission of the FA English Premier \nLeague and UEFA matches, and  \n(c) \nwhether negotiations have already started with suppliers and organisers for the \nupcoming local and international events and, if so, give details thereof and, if not, \nwhy not.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, in regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed that the annual budget allocation of the Mauritius Broadcasting Corporation for the \nbroadcasting of local and international sports events varies between 25 to 30 million rupees.  \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed by the MBC that for the FA English \nPremier League, the Corporation currently broadcasts 33 live matches per season, that is, one \n\n24 \n \nlive match every Saturday under its Free-To-Air rights package and three FA English Premier \nLeague magazine programmes each week.  \nI am also informed that the MBC has already secured the rights for the next three FA \nEnglish Premier League seasons up to the year 2028 and this Free-To-Air rights package \nincludes four FA Cup matches annually. \nConcerning UEFA matches, I am informed that the MBC has already secured a \npartnership with New World TV for the broadcasting rights of one UEFA Champions League \nmatch and one Europa League or Conference League match per match day, including the \nquarterfinals, semifinals, and finals. \nI am also informed that after several years, the MBC is now broadcasting the Spanish \nFootball League Competition known as ‘La Liga’ with one match per weekend. \nMadam Speaker, regarding part (c) of the question, I am informed that for local events, \nthe MBC works in close collaboration with event organisations and sports federations for live \nbroadcasting of same. The MBC also intends to produce and broadcast future Club M \nmatches played in Mauritius. Moreover, the upcoming horseracing season will be produced \nand broadcast live on the MBC. In addition, major sports tournaments, such as, the Mauritius \nSevens Rugby Tournament are currently in the planning phase and will be featured as part of \nthe Corporation’s expanded sports programming.   \nEfforts are also being made by the Corporation to enhance the MBC11 channel with a \nview to promoting youth engagement and the development of regional and gender-inclusive \nsports coverage.  \nMadam Speaker, in regard to international events, I am informed that the following \nnegotiations have been undertaken by the MBC – \n(i) \nan Agreement has been concluded for the live broadcast of the FIFA World Cup \n2026; \n(ii) \nthe MBC is exploring avenues to secure rights for other major events, such as, the \nFIFA Club World Cup, Africa Cup of Nations, World Athletics, and the Para-\nathletics World Championships, and \n(iii) the negotiations are ongoing for the broadcast of cycling events and other \ninternational competitions, based on rights availability. \n\n25 \n \nMadam Speaker, it is apposite for me to underscore the fact that while Free-To-Air \nbroadcasting rights are subject to limitations imposed by international organisations and their \nappointed regional distributors, the MBC remains committed to securing a diverse and \nrepresentative sports offering for the population. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. Yes! \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. L’honorable Premier ministre peut-il dire à \nla Chambre, et en particulier aussi aux amateurs de football anglais, suite à l’annonce que lui-\nmême avait faite durant la dernière campagne électorale à l’effet que tous les matchs de la \nPremier League seraient retransmis en direct à la télévision – je conviens, tous les matchs, \ncela va coûter énormément – ne serait-ce pour ceux qui n’ont pas les moyens de s’abonner \naux chaines payantes, si la MBC, à travers le Premier ministre, envisage de retransmettre ne \nserait-ce les matchs phares de chaque weekend, afin de permettre aux amateurs de football \nanglais de visionner leurs équipes préférées ? \n The Prime Minister: In fact, I thank the hon. Member for saying, given the financial \nsituation of the country; but, actually, the MBC is looking to do exactly that, if possible. \nMadam Speaker: Of course!  \nYes, the hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River! \nIFCM LTD – ROLES & FUNCTIONS – FUNDS INVESTED & DISBURSED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/272",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 272,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/272) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Industrial \nFinance Corporation of Mauritius (IFCM) Ltd., operational as from May 2022, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain information as to the – \n(a) \nrole and functions thereof; \n(b) \namount of funds invested therein; \n(c) \namount of funds disbursed in support of enterprises therefrom, and  \n(d) \nlist of beneficiaries thereof, indicating in each case the amount of funds allotted \nthereto. \n\n26",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the Industrial Finance \nCorporation of Mauritius (IFCM) Ltd was incorporated in August 2021, but was officially \nlaunched and became operational in February 2022.  \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am tabling a copy of the roles and functions of \nthe IFCM. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that a total \namount of Rs1,699,899,000 have been invested in the IFCM as follows – \n(i) \nRs1 million by the Government of Mauritius at the time of its incorporation, and \n(ii) \nthe balance of Rs1,698,899,000 through the National Resilience Fund. \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed that a Special Line of Credit to the tune of Rs5 \nbillion has been made available by the Bank of Mauritius to the IFCM to operate its various \nschemes. \nRegarding part (c) of the question, I am informed that a total amount of Rs4.29 billion \nhas been disbursed to some 298 enterprises since the operationalisation of the IFCM to date. \nWith regard to part (d) of the question, I am tabling a copy of the list of the \nbeneficiaries and the amount of funds allotted thereto. \nMadam Speaker, even a cursory look at the list would suggest the gross abuse of public \nfunds where huge amounts were disbursed to the cronies of the previous regime. \nLet me just give you a few blatant examples – \n(i) \nRs41 million to Kuros Construction Solutions Ltd – Rs41 million; \n(ii) \nRs64 million to RGT (Healthcare) Ltd, belonging to Avinash Gopee, and \n(iii) \nRs9.6 million to Artemis Hospital. \nA thorough audit will be undertaken to find out how these funds have been disbursed, \nMadam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much. Yes! \nMr Babajee: Will the hon. Prime Minister consider doing some investigations in \nregard to those allocations? \nMadam Speaker: I think he just said that. \nThe Prime Minister: I just said that, Madam Speaker. \n\n27 \n \nMadam Speaker: Yes! Okay, thank you.  \nHon. Ramdass! \nCONSUMER GOODS HIGH PRICES – RUPEE STABILISATION –INFLATION \nRATE CONTROL",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/273",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 273,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/273) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nrelatively high prices of consumer goods in Mauritius, he will state the actions being \nenvisaged by his Ministry to stabilise the rupee and control inflation rate in order to address \nthis issue.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, it is the Bank of Mauritius which has the \nprimary duty to maintain price stability while promoting orderly and balanced economic \ndevelopment. It does this through its monetary policy and the management of the exchange \nrate. \nPrior to November 2024, there was a total disarray and inconsistency in the conduct of \nmonetary policy by the Bank of Mauritius, which led to the continuous increase in the \ninflation rate, massive depreciation of the rupee and consequently, the continuous increases in \nthe price of consumer goods. \nFirst, the increase in the key rate by a cumulative 265 basis points during 2022 was not \nenough to correct for the inflation expectations and prevent the depreciation of the rupee. \nSecond, the Bank of Mauritius’ decision in September 2024 to lower the key rate by 50 \nbasis points was done for political purposes, just prior to the general elections, and this \nfurther stoked inflationary pressures in the economy. \nThird, the excessive money-printing by the Bank of Mauritius to finance the budget \ndeficit and the MIC aggravated the excess liquidity situation in the banking system and, \nagain, caused prices to surge. \nMadam Speaker, the new Management of the Bank of Mauritius, which took office in \nNovember 2024, acted promptly to remedy the situation. \nMeasures taken by the Bank of Mauritius include – \n\n28 \n \n(i) \nraising the key rate by 50 basis points to 4.5 per cent per annum in February \n2025; \n(ii) \nincreasing the supply of forex in the domestic foreign exchange market to prevent \nrapid depreciation of the rupee, as was the case before; \n(iii) instructions to commercial banks to ensure that all dealings in foreign exchange, \nincluding swaps and other derivatives are effected through financial institutions \nduly licensed by the Bank; \n(iv) stricter regulation of intercompany transactions in foreign currencies, and lastly \n(v) \ninstructions to banks to ensure that forward transactions are priced in a fair \nmanner and in accordance with market fundamentals. \nMadam Speaker, Government complemented these measures by imposing that at least \n85% of the proceeds from sales of villas under the Property Development Scheme should be \nconverted into rupees. \nFurthermore, Government reduced the prices of gasoline and diesel by Rs5 per litre in \nDecember of last year. \nAnd the Government mitigated the impact of inflation and price rises by awarding a \n14th Month Bonus covering more than 90% of workers, and the 2025 Salary Compensation. \nIt should be highlighted that, since mid-November 2024, the rupee has actually \nappreciated by around 4.5 per cent compared to the US dollar and the inflation rate has since \nbeen maintained on a downward trajectory. \nIn fact, the inflation rate, which was at a peak of 11.3 per cent in February 2023, is now \nat 2.5 per cent in March 2025. \nMadam Speaker, the Ministry of Finance will continue to coordinate with the Bank of \nMauritius to ensure coherence in our approach to curb inflationary pressures in the economy. \nIn this context, we are working on fiscal measures that will be announced in the forthcoming \nbudget. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nYes, hon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles… \n(Interruptions) \n\n29 \n \nI am sorry, you didn’t catch my eye in time! Yes! \nMr Ramdass: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Madam Speaker, further to the Statement \nmade by the hon. Prime Minister sometime back in Parliament on the State of the Economy, \nit is now of public knowledge that the previous government has been tampering with the \ncalculation of economic indicators, including the rate of inflation, and that, to hide the true, \nthe real economic situation in Mauritius. Will the hon. Prime Minister be in a position to \nenlighten the House as to the real, the true annual rate of inflation from the years 2019 to \n2024? \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, I could, but it is long. I take it you want headline inflation \nrates? Well, if I go by month, actually it is 2.5%, but, as I said, at one point it reached 11.3 %. \nI can table the whole table if you want. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Ramdass: One more question. Madam Speaker, the hon. Prime Minister of India \nhas, in the course of his recent visit to Mauritius, announced that Mauritius and India will \ntrade in Mauritian rupees. Will the hon. Prime Minister consider the advisability of seeking \nsimilar arrangements with other trade partners, precisely with a view to eliminate the risks \nand consequences of the depreciation of the rupee in Mauritius and, of course, to the benefit \nof the price level of our imports in Mauritius? \nThe Prime Minister: Unfortunately, I know of no other country that is prepared to do \nwhat India has done for us, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. That’s it, you are done?  \nHon. Jhummun, please! \nHORSERACING – BETTING TAX RATE EVOLUTION – REVENUE GENERATED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/274",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 274,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/274) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to horse racing, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain for the period 2015 to 2024 from the – \n(i) \nGambling Regulatory Authority, information as to the evolution of the \nrate of betting tax thereon;  \n\n30 \n \n(ii) \nMauritius Revenue Authority, information as to the amount of revenue \ngenerated therefrom as tax, and  \n(b) \nstate if consideration will be given to shift the tax burden from players to \noperators.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a)(i) of the question, I am \ntabling the information, for the period 2015 to 2024, relating to the evolution of the rate of \nbetting tax on horseracing. \nConcerning part (a)(ii) of the question, I am informed by the Mauritius Revenue \nAuthority that the total amount of revenue generated for the period 2015 to 2024 was Rs4.5 \nbillion as betting tax on horseracing. \nRegarding part (b) of the question, the proposal to consider the shifting of the tax \nburden from players to operators will be again examined in the context of the forthcoming \nbudget. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! That’s it! Okay. \nHon. Rookny, Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet! \nPORTS & AIRPORTS – ILLICIT DRUGS DETECTION – EQUIPMENT & \nPROTOCOLS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/275",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 275,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/275) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the fight \nagainst drugs, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police \nand the Mauritius Revenue Authority, information as to whether the airport and port of both \nmainland Mauritius and Rodrigues are sufficiently equipped for the detection of drugs \nillegally imported, indicating the equipment and protocols used by the authorities therefor.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the Police Department, in particular ADSU, and \nthe Mauritius Revenue Authority are the two main agencies responsible for the fight against \ndrugs, in particular the prevention and illegal entry of drugs into the Republic of Mauritius. \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Police that both the Police Department and the \nMauritius Revenue Authority officers work in close collaboration for the detection of illicit \ndrugs at the ports and the airport. They make use of an array of surveillance and detection \ntools for that purpose. \n\n31 \n \nI am sure the hon. Member would appreciate that, for obvious reasons, I cannot \ngive details of the equipment in use nor the protocols that have been put in place. \nI am also informed, Madam Speaker, that as the modus operandi of drug traffickers \nkeeps on evolving and they make use of the latest sophisticated equipment, it is imperative \nthat our surveillance system be continuously enhanced to keep pace with the latest trend. \nConsequently, there is need to provide our law enforcement agencies with state-of-the-art \nequipment and to ensure that they have a replacement policy for obsolete equipment. \nMoreover, these agencies should ensure that provisions are made to enter into \nmaintenance contracts so that all new and existing equipment are fully operational at all times \nfor cost-effectiveness and efficiency purposes. This was not the case before. \nIn addition, Government will invest in tailor-made capacity-building programmes for \nthe upskilling of the personnel with regard to the detection of drugs, including synthetic and \nnovel drugs. \nI wish to reiterate, Madam Speaker, that the fight against drugs is one of the topmost \npriorities of this Government. We are already translating our pledges into actions, which are \nnow showing results. To this effect, from November 2024 to March 2025, drugs for a street \nvalue of around of Rs1.2 billion have been seized. \nIn the same vein, in line with the Government Programme 2025-2029, we will today \nitself introduce the National Agency for Drug Control Bill into the National Assembly to \nprovide for the establishment of a National Agency for Drug Control, which shall be the apex \nbody for addressing the drug issue, including prevention and drug controls. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, it is a fact that we have noticed an increase in drug \nabuse in our country. I would like to know from the hon. Prime Minister if our intelligence \ngathering agencies have at least detected an increase in import of drugs through our main \nports? Thank you. \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, that is the case! That is why we had this large uphold of – I \nthink I mentioned the figure – Rs1.2 billion.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nYes, the hon. Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien! \n\n32 \n \nSSR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – PARALLEL RUNWAY CONSTRUCTION – \nLAND ACQUISITION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/276",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 276,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/276) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nproposed construction of a parallel runway at the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International \nAirport, as provided for in the Airport Master Plan, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from Airport of Mauritius Ltd., information as to where matters stand regarding the \nacquisition of land from the inhabitants of the region therefor.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Chief Executive Officer \nof Airports of Mauritius Co. Ltd (AML) that the Airport Master Plan of 2004 made provision \nfor the construction of a parallel taxiway of the length of 3,450 metres, which was also to be \nused as a runway in emergency situations. Six years later, that is, on 12 April 2010, AML \ndecided to construct the taxiway of length of 2,450 metres only. The additional length of \n1,000 metres would require the acquisition of private lands/properties along the ex-Airport \nRoad at Chat Gaon and Solitude villages. This taxiway was commissioned in July 2013 and is \noperational since that date.  \nWith regard to Chat Gaon Village, for the period 2007 to 2014, 42 properties were \nacquired for an amount of Rs104,309,109, excluding Notary, Registration Fees and Land \nTransfer Tax. In addition, another 63 properties had to be acquired. Accordingly, after a \nbidding exercise, the services of a Chartered Property Valuer and Land Surveyor were \nretained in 2019 to carry out a valuation exercise of these properties. To date, AML has \nacquired 14 of the 63 properties, for a total amount of Rs60 million, excluding all relevant \nfees, as I said.  \nRegarding the village of Solitude, a survey of residential properties was carried out by a \nprofessional Land Surveyor in November 2011. They wanted to acquire 32 properties to \ncreate an operational safety buffer zone around the airport. As at December 2024, 20 plots of \nland/properties had been acquired for the total sum of Rs47,653,114. 12 plots of \nland/properties have not yet been acquired as some of these owners did not have title deeds or \nsame were not in order while others wanted an alternative plot of land and they were also not \nagreeable with the proposed amount. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \n\n33 \n \nMr Apollon: Thank you. Can the hon. Prime Minister consider this matter as soon as \npossible?  Because the inhabitants from this region are living with daily stress as they cannot \ninvest in or renovate their existing houses. \nThe Prime Minister: The exercise is ongoing. The evaluation report of the plots of \nland of both villages dates back to 2011. AML is now planning to appoint a new Chartered \nProperty Valuer and Land Surveyor to review and update the existing reports of the 49 \nproperties at Chat Gaon and the remaining 12 at Solitude village. Negotiation will start \nthereafter. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, the hon. Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \nTOTALISATOR OPERATORS – GAMBLING LEVY – YEAR 2020",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/277",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 277,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/277) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Totalisator Operators, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nMauritius Revenue Authority and the Gambling Regulatory Authority, information as to the \namount of responsible gambling levy collected therefrom in 2020, indicating how same were \nspent.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Mauritius Revenue \nAuthority that the total amount of responsible gambling – it is the term in the law; so, I am \nusing the same term –, the levy collected in 2020 was Rs66.1 million, out of which, Rs1.8 \nmillion were from totalisator operators. \nI am also informed by the Gambling Regulatory Authority that a total amount of Rs9.6 \nmillion was spent in 2020 as follows – \n• \nRs4.5 million on laboratory tests; \n• \nRs3.2 million on consultancy and capacity building, and  \n• \nRs1.9 million on operating expenses. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Can Dr. the hon. Prime Minister confirm how the funds are being \nspent from November 2024, as I understand that the levy was initially imposed to educate the \noperators/gamblers? \n\n34 \n \nThe Prime Minister: You want to know how the levy is being used? \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: From 2024 onwards. \nThe Prime Minister: We are looking at all this in the coming Budget. I will come up \nwith an answer in the Budget. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Yes, hon. Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \nDIRECTOR OF AUDIT REPORT (2023-2024) – WASTE & POOR MANAGEMENT – \nPREVENTIVE MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/278",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 278,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/278) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the recent report of the Director of Audit highlighting systemic issues of waste and \npoor management, he will state how Government intends to proceed in order to prevent any \nfuture recurrence thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, it is an understatement to speak of waste and \npoor management. \nThe Report of the Director of Audit for the Financial Year 2023-2024 was tabled on 25 \nMarch of this year. As in previous years, the report exposed a litany of scandals, highlighting \nhow public funds have been dilapidated by the previous government. \nThe publication of the Report of the Director of Audit cannot continue to be an annual \nritual where we take stock of misuse of public funds without any concrete actions being taken \nto put an end to such a scandalous situation. \nMadam Speaker, it will not be business as usual! Stringent actions will be taken to \nensure a judicious use of public funds where the principle of value for money will be strictly \nadhered to. \nIn fact, after the tabling of the Report of the Director of Audit, I requested my \ncolleagues to analyse all the issues raised by the Director of Audit concerning their ministries \nand departments with a view to promptly addressing them. \nFurthermore, we are already taking major steps to ensure judicious use of taxpayers’ \nmoney. \n\n35 \n \nFirst, we are re-introducing the Performance-Based Budgeting based, as I said last time, \non outcomes and not on the amount of money spent. \nSecond, we have already announced and taken a commitment to introduce a Fiscal \nResponsibility Act. \nMadam Speaker, as stated in the Government Programme, to foster greater \ntransparency and accountability, we propose to make it mandatory for the Public Accounts \nCommittee to look into the Annual Audit Reports with the Accounting Officer in attendance. \nWe will also ensure that the Report of the Director of Audit is debated in the National \nAssembly and is submitted to the relevant institution for investigation, where appropriate. \nI will come up with additional measures in the Budget, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, you are directly concerned with the Public Accounts \nCommittee! \nMr A. Duval: Yes, Madam Speaker. Madam Speaker, there is an alarming issue which \nis recurrent in the reports of the Director of Audit, that is, the non-filing of financial \nstatements by statutory bodies and other entities of the State. May I ask the hon. Prime \nMinister what he proposes to do, as a matter of urgency, to ensure that government bodies are \ncompelled to provide their financial statements to the Director of Audit within the time frame \nthat the law provides? \nThe Prime Minister: This is precisely the point. The law provides for a time frame, \nbut they just ignore the time frame! No action was taken! We will ensure that this is \nremedied. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister.  \nTime is up! The following PQs have been withdrawn: B/282, B/283, and B/285.  \nHon. Members, the Table has been advised that PQs B/307 and B/333 will be replied by \nthe hon. Minister of Land Transport. PQ B/325 will be replied by the hon. Minister of Social \nIntegration, Social Security and National Solidarity. PQ B/334 will be replied by the hon. \nMinister of Youth and Sports.  \nNow, we proceed with Questions to Ministers! I call the hon. Third Member for Port \nLouis North and Montagne Longue, Mr Caserne! \n \n\n36 \n \nBUS STOPS – PUBLIC ROADS – PARKED VEHICLES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/279",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 279,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/279) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to official overseas missions undertaken by Mr S.P., GCSK, GOSK, former Speaker \nand Mr M. Z. N., former Deputy Speaker since November 2019 to October 2024, he will \nstate the number thereof, indicating in each case the amount spent in terms of air tickets, per \ndiem and other allowances, respectively.",
      "answer": "Reply: It should be recalled that the former Speaker, Mr Sooroojdev Phokeer, \ndisallowed a similar question quoting wrongly section 22(1)(n) of the Standing Orders and \n\n107 \n \nRules of the National Assembly according to which a question cannot be asked on a matter \nwithin the jurisdiction of the Speaker.  \nIt is obvious that this distorted interpretation of the Standing Orders and Rules of the \nNational Assembly was but a ploy not to provide information to the House. \nIn line with our principle of transparency and accountability, I am hereby providing the \ninformation requested by the hon. Member. \nMr Phokeer was elected as Speaker of the National Assembly on 21 November 2019 \nand he tendered his resignation on 16 July 2024 purportedly due to health issues. During his \ntenure of office, that is, from 21 November 2019 to 10 July 2024, i.e, a period of 56 months, \nthe former Speaker undertook 21 official overseas missions. \nAs regards Mr Mohammud Zahid Nazurally, who was elected as Deputy Speaker on 21 \nNovember 2019, he did not proceed on any official overseas mission during his tenure of \noffice from 21 November 2019 to 18 October 2024. \nI am informed that an amount of Rs4,423,361.42 was paid in respect of air tickets for \nMr Phokeer. Furthermore, an amount of Rs3,450,170.82 was disbursed as per diem and other \nallowances in favour of the latter. That is, a total of Rs7,873,582.24 was spent for the official \noverseas missions undertaken by Mr Phokeer over a period of 56 months. \nThe list indicating the amount spent in respect of each overseas mission undertaken by \nthe former Speaker is being placed in the Library of the National Assembly. \nPOLICE FORCE – TRAFFIC BRANCH – RIDERS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/280",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 280,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/280) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Traffic Branch, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the number of police riders attached to each \ndivision, indicating if consideration will be given for same to be beefed up considering the \nnumber of traffic challenges faced by road users.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that currently one hundred and \nsixty-five police riders are posted to the Traffic Branch of the Mauritius Police Force. These \npolice riders are deployed in seven Field Divisions as follows – \n(i) \nTraffic Enforcement Squad – 24; \n\n108 \n \n(ii) \nNorthern Traffic Field Division – 23; \n(iii) Metro North and South Traffic Field Division – 35; \n(iv) Eastern Traffic Field Division – 21; \n(v) \nWestern Traffic Field Division – 25; \n(vi) Central Traffic Field Division – 25, and \n(vii) Southern Traffic Field Division – 12.  \nThe main duties of the police riders are inter-alia to – \n(i) \nregulate traffic at strategic locations throughout the island; \n(ii) \nescort heavy or oversized motor vehicles; \n(iii) \nattend to emergencies including road accidents and obstructions; \n(iv) \nfacilitate the movement of foot and vehicular processions; \n(v) \nensure the smooth passage of VVIP convoys, and \n(vi) \nperform crack down operations such as speed checks, alcohol, and drug test and \nchecks on suspicious vehicles with the assistance of other units of the Mauritius \nPolice Force. \nWith the increase in the number of vehicles on our roads and the expansion of the road \nnetwork, there is a need for more police riders to ensure effective traffic management, road \nsafety and security. In this regard, action is being taken by Police to increase the capacity of \nthe Traffic Branch, not only in terms of additional police riders, but also through the \nacquisition of new motorcycles and training of the police riders. \nRODRIGUES – LIVESTOCK THEFT– REPORTED CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/281",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 281,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/281) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the theft of livestock \nin Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, \ninformation as to the number of reported cases thereof since January 2024 to date, indicating \n– \n(a)  if police inquiries were carried out thereinto, and  \n(b)  the number of arrests, if any, effected in connection therewith. \n\n109",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that from January 2024 to 03 \nApril 2025, eight cases of livestock larceny have been reported to the Police in Rodrigues.  \nWith regard to parts (a) and (b) of the question, I am informed that an enquiry has been \ninitiated in each case. So far, in one case, two persons have been arrested and sentenced by \nthe Court. One case has been filed following the recovery of the livestock. The remaining \ncases are under enquiry, and no arrests have been made so far. \nI am further informed by the Commissioner of Police that, based on an analysis of \nreported livestock larceny cases in Rodrigues, preventive patrols are regularly conducted by \nthe local Police, CID and ADSU in larceny-prone areas.  The Police is also monitoring \nhabitual criminals and individuals under police supervision who are likely to be involved in \nsuch larcenies.  Moreover, the Police is sensitising the community on securing animal sheds, \nand encouraging the establishment of neighbourhood watches to enhance vigilance over \nlivestock. \nI am also informed by the Rodrigues Regional Assembly that the Commission for \nAgriculture is sensitising farmers to tag their livestock to facilitate identification. \nSAFE CITY CAMERAS – DATA PROTECTION ACT – PURVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/282",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 282,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/282) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Safe City cameras, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to whether consideration will be given for the \noperation thereof to be placed under the purview of the Data Protection Act and, if so, when \nand, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n2% CORPORATE CLIMATE RESPONSIBILITY LEVY – MUR 50 MILLION \nTURNOVER FIRMS – REVENUE GENERATED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/283",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 283,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/283) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the 2 per cent Corporate Climate Responsibility levy charged on firms having a \nturnover of more than MUR 50 million in the global business sector, he will – \n\n110 \n \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Revenue Authority, \ninformation as to the revenue generated since its introduction to date, and  \n(b) \nstate its impact on the global business sector, indicating the purpose thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPOLICE FORCE – POLICE OFFICERS’ RECRUITMENT – PSYCHOMETRIC \nTESTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/284",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 284,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/284) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo  (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Police Force, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to whether psychometric tests are carried out on \nPolice officers to assess their aptitudes and mental health conditions prior to their \nrecruitment, particularly in light of the number of reported suicide cases thereof and, if so, \nindicate if such tests are regularly carried out during their tenure of office.",
      "answer": "Reply: The recruitment of Police Officers is carried out by the Disciplined Forces \nService \nCommission. \nThe \nselection \nexercise \ncomprises \nthe \nfollowing \naptitude \ntests/examinations – \n(i) \nPhysical Measurement Test; \n(ii) \nPhysical Aptitude/Operational Field Test, and \n(iii) Medical Examination. \nNo psychometric tests are carried out on candidates to assess their aptitudes and mental \nhealth conditions prior to recruitment of Police Officers. \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Police that after their enlistment and also during \ntheir tenure of office, Police Officers are not subjected to any psychometric tests.  \nHowever, the four Police Psychologists at the Mauritius Police Force give lectures on \nstress management and provide psychological support to new recruits as well as serving \nofficers, exhibiting signs of distress in the exercise of their duties. \nSince 2010, a Stress Management and Intervention Strategy has been put in place in the \nPolice Force for the purpose of assisting Police Officers to cope with stressful situations. The \nStrategy is in two folds comprising medical and organisational support. Divisional \n\n111 \n \nCommanders and Branch Officers are required to identify Police Officers showing suicidal \ntendencies or signs of mental disturbance, and to refer the distressed officer for psychological \nhelp or to the Chief Police Medical Officer for proper treatment. Upon the latter’s advice, \nPolice Officers having signs of depression, mental ill-health, trauma and suicidal tendencies \nare relieved from duties requiring handling of weapons or long hours of sentry duties, and to \nthe extent possible, are not required to operate alone or work in isolation, whether at the \nPolice Station or on patrol or any other location. \n \n \nPIO – MAURITIUS CITIZENSHIP – FOREIGN BENEFICIARIES LIST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/285",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 285,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/285) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Mauritius Citizenship, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Passport \nand Immigration Office, information as to the number thereof granted to foreigners for the \nperiods November 2019 to November 2024 and November 2024 to date, indicating in each \ncase the –  \n(a) \nnames of the beneficiaries thereof and their respective country of birth, and  \n(b) \nspecific section of the Mauritius Citizenship Act under which citizenship was \ngranted.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPUBLIC OFFICERS –TRADE UNION ACTIVITIES INVOLVEMENT – ALLEGED \nDISMISSAL",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/286",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 286,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/286) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to public \nofficers who were reportedly dismissed due to their involvement in trade union activities over \nthe past ten years, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number \nthereof, indicating the measures being taken to reinstate them in their respective position, if \nany. \n\n112",
      "answer": "Reply (The Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms): I am informed \nthat over the past ten years, no public officer has been dismissed due to involvement in trade \nunion activities. \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 08 – DRUG TRAFFICKING – LAW ENFORCEMENT \nACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/287",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 287,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/287) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the fight \nagainst drug trafficking, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner \nof Police, information as to the number of searches carried out in relation thereto in \nConstituency No. 8, Quartier Militaire and Moka since January 2023 to date, indicating the – \n(a) \nnumber of – \n(i) \narrests effected, and  \n(ii) \nconvictions secured in connection therewith, and  \n(b) \nactions taken for law enforcement in relation thereto within the said Constituency.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that, from January 2023 to 03 \nApril 2025, 646 searches have been effected by Police in Constituency No. 8 – Quartier \nMilitaire and Moka, in relation to dangerous drugs and other illicit substances. \nOut of these, 285 searches led to the seizure of dangerous drugs and other illicit \nsubstances. No drugs or any illicit substance were found in the remaining 361 searches. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat following the searches, 288 persons have been arrested. \nI am further informed that as at 03 April 2025, all the cases were either still under \nenquiry or awaiting advice from the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions or pending \ntrial. As such, there has not been any conviction. \nRegarding part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that a \nmulti-pronged strategy has been put in place in regard to the fight against drug trafficking \naround the island, including Constituency No. 8, whereby the following actions are taken – \n(i) \nregular crackdown operations for the prevention and detection of drug cases; \n\n113 \n \n(ii) \nidentification and tracking of drug peddlers as well as profiling of ‘Persons of \nInterest’ through intelligence gathering to identify their role and involvement in \nthe drug nexus; \n(iii) \ndrug mapping to locate ‘Areas of Concern’ where drug activities are being carried \nout and drug addicts tend to loiter; \n(iv) \nregular aerial patrols through helicopters and drones to detect cultivation of \ncannabis;  \n(v) \nsensitization campaigns by the Crime Prevention Unit, Brigade pour la \nProtection de la Famille and ADSU Education Cells to raise awareness on the ill-\neffects of substance abuse, including synthetic drugs targeting mostly youngsters; \n(vi) \ntailor-made trainings to ADSU Officers to better fight against drug scourge, and \n(vii) \ncollaboration with other concerned agencies such as the Ministry of Health and \nWellness, the National Drug Secretariat and the Mauritius Revenue Authority for \na concerted approach in the fight against drug trafficking. \nPRE-OWNED VEHICLES – REGISTRATION DUTIES – WAIVE OFF",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/288",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 288,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/288) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to bus stops on public roads, \nhe will state if he has been made aware of inconveniences caused, by vehicles parked thereat \nand opposite same, to passengers and road users and if so, indicate if consideration will be \ngiven for the provision of yellow lines thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed that provisions are made under \nsubsection 2(c)(i) of Section 72 of the Parking on a Road as per G. N. No. 53 of 2010 of the \nRoad Traffic (Construction and Use of Vehicles) Regulations 2010, as subsequently amended \nin G.N. No. 170 of 2010, to prohibit motor vehicles other than a bus to be parked – \n(i) \nwithin a distance of 12 metres before and 8 metres after the bus stop signpost; \n(ii) \n20 metres opposite the restricted length covered in – […]. \nTherefore, it is a traffic offence for vehicles, other than a motor bus, to park over a \ndistance of 8 metres ahead and 12 metres behind a bus stop sign or 20 metres opposite \nwithout the provision of yellow line markings. The rationale behind the siting of bus stops \nrevolves around several key principles that prioritise passenger safety, its efficiency and \naccessibility within a catchment for promoting the use of public transportation. \nHowever, Madam Speaker, from daily observations and past surveys, it can be seen that \nparking of vehicles at and opposite some bus stops creates traffic problems as well as road \nsafety issues. Parked vehicles can block the path of buses trying to pull into the bus stop, \nforcing passengers to board or alight further away from the designated area, sometimes on the \nroad itself, which poses a safety risk. Obstructions can also make it difficult for larger buses \nto manoeuvre and can impede the flow of general traffic. Therefore, the provision of yellow \nlines beyond the prescribed limitations may be considered at those problematic locations. \nMadam Speaker, there is merit in the question of the hon. Member as regards if \nconsideration will be given for the provision of yellow lines around bus stops because many \npeople do not know about the distances to be respected. Too often, vehicles have to wait \nlengthily behind stationary buses alighting or boarding passengers at bus stops because there \nare vehicles parked on the opposite side of the bus stop, thereby hindering traffic flow. \nMadam Speaker, I, therefore, believe that consideration should be given for the \nprovision of yellow lines, as questioned by the hon. Member, in extreme and priority places. \n\n37 \n \nHowever, it may not be feasible for all such cases given the considerable impact this measure \nwill have on the neighbourhood. Consideration will be given to the special query of the hon. \nMember and of the hon. Members on a case-to-case basis. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Caserne: Madame la présidente, comme souligné dans la question, c’est une \nsituation assez embarrassante et qui cause des bouchons et congestions routières. Il est aussi \nnoté qu’il y a des opérateurs ou des chauffeurs qui agissent comme deux fonctions, c’est-à-\ndire comme chauffeur et receveur, ce qui occasionne aussi ce genre de bouchon et de \ncongestion. J’aimerais demander à l’honorable ministre si cette pratique est légale et courante \nà son intention ? \nMadam Speaker: Vous connaissez la réponse ! \nMr Osman Mahomed: In fact, both of them are illegal. To keep people waiting behind \nthe buses, and the fact that they do not have conductors, is definitely not legal because we are \npaying; the government is subsidising drivers and conductors and the bus companies in \ngeneral. Definitely, it is not legal. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Third Member for Grand’Baie and Poudre d’Or. \nAMBASSADORS, HIGH COMMISSIONERS & PERMANENT \nREPRESENTATIVES OF MAURITIUS ABROAD – QUALIFICATIONS & \nSALARIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/289",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 289,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade",
      "question": "(No. B/289) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade whether, \nin regard to the Ambassadors, High Commissioners and Permanent Representatives of \nMauritius posted at Mauritius Embassies abroad over the period 2015 to 2024, he will give a \nlist thereof, indicating in each case the – \n(a) \ndate of posting and of accreditation; \n(b) \nqualifications thereof; \n(c) \nbasic salary drawn, including the detailed allowances paid thereto, and \n(d) \nother amount, if any, refunded thereto as medical expenses.",
      "answer": "Mr Ramful: Madam Speaker, allow me with your permission to answer PQs B/289 \nand B/342 together as they both relate to the expenses in relation to the posts of ambassadors. \n\n38 \n \n Madam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister! \n Mr Ramful: Madam Speaker, Section 87 of the Constitution of Mauritius provides for \nthe ‘Appointment of principal representatives of Mauritius abroad’. As such, the power to \nappoint persons to hold offices of Ambassador, High Commissioner or other principal \nrepresentative of Mauritius in any other country or accredited to any international \norganisation is vested in the President, acting in accordance with the advice of the Prime \nMinister. \nMadam Speaker, I am tabling the list of Ambassadors, High Commissioners and \nPermanent Representatives; their date of posting, qualifications and basic salary, dates of \naccreditation, and allowances. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (d) of the question, allow me to inform the House \nthat all medical expenses are refunded to Ambassadors in line with provisions made in the \nPRB report and their contract of employment which are as follows – \n90% of the amount of medical expenses be refunded for themselves, spouse and \ndependent children aged up to 20 years, subject to – \n(i) \nthe production of duly signed and certified copies of medical certificates and \nprescriptions, invoices and receipts. \n(ii) \nThe claim being submitted on the prescribed form as determined by the \nMinistry of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade, duly \nsigned by the officer making the claim and upon the recommendation of the \nhead of mission. \n(iii) \nMedical bills falling within the protocol and guidelines approved by the \nGovernment. \nIn case of hospitalisation for surgical intervention, medical expenses incurred in respect \nthereof are refunded in toto, subject to the conditions set out in the above provisions, to an \nofficer, his or her spouse, dependent children aged up to 20 years and accompanying \ndependents of unmarried carrier diplomats upon their posting to overseas missions. \nThere is also an exclusion list of treatments for which no refund is entertained, such as \ncosmetic treatments and contact lenses. I have, therefore, tabled the list of medical expenses \nrefunded to Ambassadors, High Commissioners and Permanent Representatives.  \n\n39 \n \nMadam Speaker, with regard to PQ B/342, as per their roles and responsibilities, \nAmbassadors actively manage and maintain diplomatic relations between the home country \nand host countries as well as accredited countries. They also engage in political and economic \nnegotiations and safeguard the home country’s interest in the host country. \nTo be able to fulfil these obligations, Ambassadors are called upon to travel to various \ncountries for the following reasons –  \n(i) \npresentation of credentials to accredited countries and accredited international \norganisations; \n(ii) \nrepresent the President and the Prime Minister in summits and high-level \nmeetings; \n(iii) \nrepresent ministers in conferences, meetings and negotiations, and  \n(iv) \nattending national days and having bilateral meetings with foreign dignitaries.  \nAll overseas missions undertaken by Ambassadors need to have been approved by the \nMinistry. During their overseas mission, per diem is paid to Ambassadors, High \nCommissioners to cover the cost of accommodation, meals, internal transportation and other \nrelated expenses. The rate payable, which is approved by the Ministry of Finance, depends on \nthe country which they are travelling to. \nAmbassadors based abroad are sometimes also required to travel to Mauritius for \nconsultations in specific cases. For example, the presence of an ambassador may be required \nduring high-level visits of foreign Presidents, Prime Ministers of countries to which the \nambassador is accredited. Ambassadors are therefore paid a per diem of Rs7,340 per day for \na maximum of 15 days to cover costs of accommodations and meals. \nMadam Speaker, with your permission, I am tabling two lists – \n(i) \nthe first one pertaining to the period 2015-2019, and  \n(ii) \nthe second one for the records of 2020 to 2024.  \nHowever, Madam Speaker, allow me to say that it has been highlighted that some \npolitically appointed ambassadors as opposed to career ambassadors travelled to Mauritius in \nOctober 2024, just before the elections, on public funds, under the guise of urgent \nconsultations, and were seen to be involved in election campaigns. \n\n40 \n \nFurther, the last Director of Audit Report has made mention of a number of adverse \nfindings on a few politically appointed ambassadors who have made abuse of their privileges. \nFor example, converting their annual and sick leaves into official duties whilst in Mauritius, \nthus benefiting from public funds, and some even extending their stay in Mauritius on \ndisguised official missions while benefiting from chauffeur-driven cars at the expense of the \ngovernment. \nThe findings of the Director of Audit Report are being looked into by the Internal Audit \nCommittee at the level of my ministry to take remedial actions. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister! \nOne moment! One moment! I have an announcement to make. \nANNOUNCEMENT \nUNITED NATIONS SECRETARY-GENERAL'S SPECIAL ENVOY FOR ROAD \nSAFETY– MR J. TODT – VISIT TO MAURITIUS \nHon. Members, j’ai l’honneur de saluer la présence à l’Assemblée nationale de \nMonsieur Jean Todt. \nMr Todt is the United Nations Secretary-General's Special Envoy for Road Safety. \nSeated in the distinguished VIP Gallery, he is known for his global advocacy for road safety. \nHe is currently in Mauritius on an official 24-hour visit at the invitation of Dr. the hon. \nPrime Minister, during which he will be having meetings with key stakeholders to discuss \nstrategies for reducing road accidents. \nBienvenue parmi nous, Monsieur Todt. \nThank you for your attention. \nMr Etwareea: Madame la présidente, je voulais attirer l’attention de la Chambre sur \nles abus commis par les anciens diplomates, notamment les nominés politiques et dans \ncertains cas, des loyers de plus de R 500 000 à R 1 million par mois ont été payés pour les \nloyers de servir les diplomates. Il y a d’autres cas et je voulais poser la question au ministre, \ns’il est au courant que dans une ambassade au Moyen-Orient, une dizaine de voitures ont été \nachetées dans un espace de temps très court. \nMadam Speaker: Monsieur le ministre, vous avez la réponse ? \n\n41 \n \nMr Ramful: Yes, as I have mentioned in my reply, there are a number of abuses on the \npart of ambassadors that have been highlighted, and at the level of my ministry, there is an \naudit committee which has been set up, chaired by the Permanent Secretary of my ministry, \nstudying the audit report. And, as I have said, remedial actions will be taken. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you! Yes, Mr A. Duval! \nMr A. Duval: Does the hon. Minister agree that it is high time to do our cost…  \nMadam Speaker: No, talk to me! Talk to me!  \nYou are addressing the Minister! \nMr A. Duval: Yes, I am. I am talking, yes. Does the Minister agree that it is high time \nto do a cost-benefit analysis of our foreign diplomatic missions abroad and to align with the \nSingaporean model, that is, that ambassadors are based in Mauritius but travel and arrange all \ntheir meetings, their working sessions, etc., for specific periods of time to save public funds \nand also to merge embassies; for example, in the case of France and the embassy in Germany, \nwhich does not necessarily have a high raison d’être? \n(Interruptions) \nWell…  \nMadam Speaker: I think he got your message.  \nMr A. Duval: Is he prepared to do that? \nMr Bhagwan: Lakoz Speaker inn pran ene mwa inn voyaze… \nMadam Speaker: Let the Minister answer! \nMr Ramful: Well, this question, Madam … \nMadam Speaker: Mr Bhagwan, the Minister is just behind you, trying to answer. \nMr Ramful: This proposition will have to be studied, but then the hon. Member should \nalso bear in mind that we have diplomatic relations with a lot of countries, and we have to be \nvery careful when taking the decision to close embassies, etc.  So, the question will be \nstudied, but then ... \nMr A. Duval: to merge…  \nMr Ramful:  … we will come up with propositions. \nMr Jhummun: Bizin pa pran pension.  \n\n42 \n \nMr A. Duval: If I may, Madam, just to …  \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: No, no! You don’t clarify; you put questions! \nMr Jhummun: Pa pran pension Speaker… \nMr Bhagwan: Al voyaze!  \nMadam Speaker: You can put your supplementary questions.  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: He cannot speak from a sitting position! \nMadam Speaker: Yes, don’t speak from a sitting position but everyone is doing that. \nMr A. Duval: Yes, thank you, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker, the proposition is for the merging of certain embassies.  \nMadam Speaker: No! No! Question!  \nMr A. Duval: Yes, the question is … \nMadam Speaker: We all received your proposals and I know what I am talking about. \nDon’t forget. Okay, question! Question! \nMr A. Duval: May I ask – Madam Speaker, around half of our diplomatic missions are \ncosting us more money than they should really… \nMadam Speaker: Question! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: The question is – since ambassadors have not yet been appointed for \nmost of them, it is now a perfect time to do that. Will he do so now? \nMr Ramful: I can assure the hon. Member that we will not do like the previous \ngovernment to nominate or appoint political agents at the level of our embassies. So, we will \ndefinitely look at competent people who can, of course, bring resources to the country.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you! \n Mrs Savabaddy, your question.  \n \n\n43 \n \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 4 – WASTEWATER SEWERAGE NETWORK – \nEXTENSION & TIME FRAME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/290",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 290,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/290) Mrs A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the  Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to wastewater \nsewerage network, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Wastewater \nManagement Authority, information as to the regions which are not presently covered \ntherewith in Constituency No. 4, Port Louis North and Montagne Longue, indicating if \nconsideration is being given to extend same to these regions and, if so, the time frame to \nimplement same.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, la CWA m’informe que la Circonscription No. \n4, Port Louis Nord/Montagne Longue, comprend des zones d’équipées non raccordées aux \nréseaux d’égouts. \nUne partie des zones de cette circonscription relève du projet 3 d’assainissement de \nBaie du Tombeau, mis en œuvre par phases. Les zones actuellement non raccordées aux \nréseaux d’égouts sont : Caro Lalo, Vallée des Prêtres, une partie de Le Hochet Terre Rouge, \nMorcellement Raffray, Morcellement Tara, Bois Pignolet, Riche Terre, Montagne Longue, \nNotre-Dame, Crève-Cœur et Congomah. \nMadame la présidente, afin d’assurer la continuité de l’extension du réseau \nd’assainissement dans la Circonscription no. 4, la WMA met actuellement en œuvre un projet \nd’assainissement à Caro Lalo, Vallée des Prêtres, pour un montant de R 216,28 million. \nParallèlement, les demandes de raccordement des maisons et d’extension des réseaux \nd’égouts, si techniquement faisables bien sûr, réalisables, sont examinées dans le cadre de \ndeux accords-cadres en cours. \nMadame la présidente, pour l’exercice 2025-2026, la WMA prévoit de mettre en œuvre \nun autre projet d’assainissement à Capitaine Pontré à Sainte-Croix. Ce projet fait suite à une \npétition des habitants se plaignant des débordements récurrents des fosses en raison de \nl’imperméabilité des sols. La WMA a soumis une demande de financement au ministère des \nFinances. A l’issue du projet, une cinquantaine de maisons seront raccordées au réseau \npublic. \nJe suis aussi informé, Madame la présidente, que la WMA procède de manière \nprogressive et que les régions restantes sans égouts, dans la Circonscription no. 4, seront \n\n44 \n \nprises en compte dans le cadre du plan directeur de 2025 et au cours des prochains exercices \nfinanciers, bien sûr, sur la base du financement fourni par le gouvernement. \nMadam Speaker: Merci. Yes, supplementary question. \nMrs Savabaddy: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I thank the hon. Minister for his answer. \nMay I impress upon him to act diligently as my constituency a été l’enfant pauvre du système \nd’évacuation d’eaux usées and the problem requires urgent attention? Thank you. \nMr Assirvaden: C’est tombé dans l’oreille de quelqu’un qui entend. Alors bien sûr, \ndans le plan directeur, votre circonscription sera prise en compte. Merci. \nMadam Speaker: C’est bon, Madame Savabaddy? \nMrs Savabaddy: Oui!  \nMadam Speaker: Next one is hon. François! \nRAINWATER HARVESTING – AMENDED LEGISLATIONS – INCENTIVES & \nREBATES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/291",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 291,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/291) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister \nof Local Government whether, in regard to rainwater harvesting, he will state if consideration \nwill be given to – \n(a)  amending the relevant legislations to make it mandatory for newly constructed \nresidential, industrial and commercial buildings to be equipped therewith, and  \n(b)   reviewing the incentive and rebate on property tax on investment for a rainwater \nharvesting system.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, at the very outset, allow me to thank the hon. Member \nfor this interesting question. The suggestion of making it mandatory for newly residential, \nindustrial and commercial buildings to be equipped with rainwater harvesting systems is very \nrelevant. \nI will explain comprehensively what is being done on this subject. \nThe Building and Land Use Permit, that is, the BLUP, is issued under section 117 of \nthe Local Government Act, which stipulates that every application for a Building and Land \nUse Permit shall be in accordance with the following enactments and any guidelines issued \nthereunder – \n\n45 \n \na) The Construction Industry Authority Act 2023; \nb) The Town and Country Planning Act 1954; \nc) The Planning and Development Act 2004; \nd) The Environment Act 2024; \ne) The Mauritius Fire and Rescue Service Act 2013; \nf) The Climate Change Act 2020, and \ng) Any other enactment as may be prescribed. \nAlso, at present, the law does not make provision for the installation of a rainwater \nharvesting system for major projects requiring an Environmental Impact Assessment, that is, \nthe EIA license, or an approved Primarily Environmental Report, that is, the PER. Proponents \nare advised to adhere to sustainable principles including rainwater harvesting. \nI am advised that at present, developers having an EIA certificate or approved PER are \nbeing monitored as regards their adherence to requirements. Currently, the Local Government \nAct is being reviewed. \nIn this context, amendments will be brought to the existing legislation to make it \nmandatory for new industrial and large commercial buildings to be equipped with a rainwater \nharvesting system. It will also be mandatory for promoters to include the rainwater harvesting \nsystem in new residential complexes. \nSimilarly, existing commercial and industrial buildings will be given a period of \nmoratorium to implement rainwater harvesting systems It is understood that for small \nbusiness owners and households, it may be difficult to implement a rainwater harvesting \nsystem given the acquisition of space and cost. However, a cost-benefit analysis would need \nto be carried out before making it compulsory for low-income households and small \nbusinesses to install rainwater harvesting systems. \nConsideration is being given to raising public awareness of the advantages of having a \nrainwater harvesting system. My ministry will therefore work with the Ministry of \nEnvironment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change and the Ministry of Energy and \nPublic Utilities to create awareness on the need for each household and business operator to \nhave a rainwater harvesting system. \n\n46 \n \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Ministry of Finance that \ngrants/subsidies for rainwater harvesting systems have been provided. \nIn the Financial Year 2024-25, an amount of Rs4 m. has been earmarked for the \nMinistry of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change to implement the \nRainwater Harvesting Programme in 10 schools and 10 NGOs in order to encounter the \nproblem of water stress during times of water shortage. These ten schools and NGOs were \nselected following an open invitation launch by the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste \nManagement and Climate Change on 23 January 2025 among schools and NGOs. \nTo implement the rainwater harvesting system for the project just mentioned, a bidding \nexercise was launched by the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management and \nClimate Change on 23 January 2025 for the – \n(a) \nsupply, fixing and commissioning of 20 rainwater harvesters, and \n(b) \nsupply, fixing and commissioning of 16 sets of 9,000 litres rainwater harvesting \nsystem and four sets of 5,000 litres rainwater harvesting systems with pre-\ntreatment system with screen basket, piping system for rainwater collection, \ninclusive of fittings. \nOpening of bid was carried out on 21 February 2025. Three bids were received and \nsame are being evaluated. The evaluation has been completed in the beginning of April 2025 \nand the project implementation is due to start shortly. In addition, a scheme for rainwater \nharvesting system investment allowance income deduction for individuals has been \nintroduced by the Ministry of Finance. Under this scheme, an individual may deduct from his \nnet income the full amount invested during an income year in the rainwater harvesting system \nto capture, filter and store rainwater under the rainwater harvesting system investment \nallowance when filling the income tax returns. \nThe scheme includes the election for consultancy, design works, excavation works, \ngutters and specialised water tanks in relation to the setting up of a rainwater harvesting \nsystem. In the case of a couple, the total amount invested may be claimed either by one \nspouse or in equal proportion by both spouses. The full cost of the rainwater harvesting \nsystem can be deducted from the income tax claim. Any unrelieved amount of an income year \nmay be carried forward and deducted against the net income of succeeding years. \nAn assessment of this scheme will be made in the course of the next financial year to \ndetermine the uptake. \n\n47 \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. We have nine minutes left! The hon. \nThird Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 20 – DRAINS CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/292",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 292,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/292) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the construction of drains in \nConstituency No. 20, Beau-Bassin and Petite-Rivière for Financial Year 2024-2025, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Land Drainage Authority, information as to the – \n(a) \namount of funds budgeted therefor, indicating the projects completed as at date \ntogether with their respective costs, and \n(b) \nongoing projects, indicating in each case the location and respective cost \nthereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Land Drainage Authority that in \nConstituency No. 20, Beau-Bassin and Petite-Rivière, nine drain projects to the tune of some \nRs48.6 m. have been completed during the Financial Year 2024-2025. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question pertaining to ongoing projects, I am informed \nthat one project has been finalised for implementation, namely flooding mitigation measures \nat Splendid View, Albion, for a total cost of around Rs114.9 m. The project comprises the \nconstruction of – \n(i) \nculvert along Albion Approach Road; \n(ii) \ndrains towards Albion Approach Road, overflow structure and trial pits, and \n(iii) \ndrains and culverts towards Morcellement Serenis and reinforced concrete drain \nbelow Magenta Canal. \nI am informed that works order to the tune of around Rs13.8 m. has already been issued \nby the RDA on 12 December 2024 for the construction of the culvert along Albion Approach \nRoad and works are expected to be completed by mid-September 2025. \nOn the other hand, works order for the remaining scope is expected to be issued by the \nNDU by the end of this week. Works are expected to start by 12 May 2025 for a duration of \nfive months. Madam Speaker, I would also like to highlight that bidding documents have \nalready been prepared for the following projects – \n\n48 \n \n(i) \nflood mitigation measures along B78 and B105 roads at Albion for an estimated \ncost of Rs216.5 m. which will be implemented by the RDA, and \n(ii) \nconstruction of mitigating measures in the region of Coromandel, which will be \ncarried out by the DICL for an estimated cost of Rs563.8 m. \nBids are expected to be invited once financial clearance is obtained from the Ministry \nof Finance. Moreover, I am informed by the NDU that four projects for a total sum of \nRs433.5 m. are currently at consultancy stage and would be implemented subject to \navailability of funds. These projects are – \n(i) \nconstruction of collected rain starting from the junction of Subramanien Bharati \nRoad and Bakoorising Road to sugarcane field passing in front of MITD, Verger \nBissambar, Mont Roches; \n(ii) \nconstruction of drain at Victor Hugo Street, Beau Bassin; \n(iii) \nconstruction of drain at Allée Rousaille and surroundings, Gros Cailloux, and  \n(iv) \nconstruction of drain at Dwarka Lane off Riche Lieu Branch Road, Coromandel. \nI am also informed that some additional 14 drain projects in Constituency No. 20 \nestimated to cost Rs149.7 m. have also been identified for implementation subject to \navailability of funds. \n Madam Speaker, with your permission, I am tabling the list of the completed and \nongoing drain projects. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Hon. François, do you have a new \nquestion?  \nMr François: That is fine, Madam Speaker. \nCOP30 – NATIONALLY DETERMINED CONTRIBUTION 3.0",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/293",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 293,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/293) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nEnvironment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in regard to the \nNationally Determined Contribution (NDC) 3.0 update for the forthcoming COP30, he will \nstate where matters stand, indicating – \n(a) \nif consultations have been held thereon with the community at large; \n(b) \nthe financing mechanisms and strategies put in place therefor, and \n\n49 \n \n(c) \nthe outcomes of the previous NDC.",
      "answer": "Mr Bhagwan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. The House may wish to note that, in line \nwith the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Paris \nAgreement, the preparation of the NDC 3.0 is being carried out with the collaboration of the \nGIZ, a German development partner, under its NDC Partnership Resilience Support \nProgramme.  \nThe GIZ expert team has started the consultation process with the Department of \nClimate Change of my ministry since November 2024 and has already conducted a \nstocktaking exercise. \nThe GIZ expert team, which was in Mauritius from 17 February to 21 February 2025, \nhas presented the outcome of a draft desk review to stakeholders of the Climate Change \nCommittee and provided the highlights of a road map, which identifies the process of \nupdating the NDC. The draft desk review and road map include recommendations for the \ndevelopment of the NDC 3.0 and an accompanying NDC development plan. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, consultations had already been \nheld at the level of the Climate Change Committee at its meeting held on 17 February 2025 \nunder the chair of my ministry and which saw the participation of all its members from the \npublic and private sector, the civil society, including officers of the Commission de \nl’Environnement of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly, virtually, in the presence of the GIZ \nteam. The GIZ expert team, moreover, held several bilateral meetings with key ministries and \ndepartments to consolidate the roadmap, outline clear steps, roles and responsibilities of \nnational stakeholders, as well as identify potential international experts to support the \ndevelopment of a sectoral pathway for the NDC 3.0. \nMadam Speaker, my ministry is in the process of finalising a calendar of activities to \npursue the dialogues and consultations. National consultations will be held shortly with the \npublic at large, including that of Rodrigues, to invite them to submit their suggestions and \nvision for a national climate agenda. Madam Speaker, any suggestion from members of \nRodrigues in this august Assembly would be most welcome. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, responding to the climate \nchallenges requiring significant financing, the Nationally Determined Contribution of 2021 \nhad estimated the climate requirement of the Republic of Mauritius to be USD 6.5 billion. It \nis expected that the NDC 3.0 will indicate a substantial increase in investment required to \n\n50 \n \naddress climate adaptation and mitigation. In consultation with the Ministry of Finance, an \ninvestment plan will be prepared to identify the most appropriate financing instruments to \nmeet the targets of the forthcoming NDC 3.0, which will have a timeline of 2025-2035. An \neffective response to climate actions will necessitate more effective access to climate finance \nat the national level, including both public and private sector financing at the international \nlevel. \nMadam Speaker, this Government has already taken initiatives to enhance the financing \ngovernance mechanisms by improving transparency and accountability through the \nintroduction of the programme-based budgeting and the targeting of climate expenditures in \nseven pilot ministries, including my ministry. The tagging exercise is expected to be carried \nout thereafter in all government ministries and parastatal bodies. \nMadam Speaker, concerning part (c) of the question, I wish to inform the House that \nthe 2021 Nationally Determined Contributions are still valid until the year 2030. Moving \nahead with 2025, the NDC 3.0 will ensure that ambitions are made more robust and realistic \ntowards making Mauritius a climate-resilient and low-emission country. The biennial \nTransparency Report prepared by my ministry in 2024, which tracked the implementation of \na Nationally Determined Contribution, showed that only 15% reduction of greenhouse gas \nemissions was achieved in 2022 against a target of 40%. Only 17% of renewable energy was \nintegrated into the energy mix against a target of 60% by 2030. The House may wish to know \nthat the contribution of renewable energy in the energy mix at the national level in 2005 was \n25%, and after 20 years, it decreased to only 17%. \nIn spite of the difficult economic situation, the government will spare no efforts to put \nin place the necessary resources to meet the target and set and address our climate agenda. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. At this stage, we are breaking. You keep your \nsupplementary for after lunch. Yes! \nAn hon. Member: It is short. \nMadam Speaker: Short, but he will have to reply to you. \n(Interruptions) \nVous savez ce que c’est que l’hypoglycémie ? I am going to raise for two and a half hours. He \ncan put his question… \n\n51 \n \n(Interruptions) \nOne and a half hour… \n(Interruptions) \nOne and a half hour! We will come back at 2.30 p.m.! Everybody is deciding! C’est \nincroyable!  \n(Interruptions) \nYes, we are raising for one and a half hour. \nAt 1.01 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.33 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Please be seated! Let us go back to the question of hon. \nFrançois. You have a supplementary? \nMr François: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Given the complexity of the global \nclimate landscape, where Mauritius requires an investment of USD 6.5 billion, out of which \n4.2 billion is from international funds and USD 2.3 billion from the government and private \nsector, may I humbly request the hon. Minister, through a collective societal approach, to \nensure that considerations are given to strengthen our mitigation targets and strategies? \nMr Bhagwan: Definitely, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I can reassure my good friend that \nwe are working in that direction with all the different stakeholders, even with the Ministry of \nFinance especially, and we are definitely going in that direction. \nMr François: Just one more. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Go ahead. \nMr François: May I ask the hon. Minister, with regard to all the climate change \nchallenges ahead, whether Government is contemplating including Rodrigues’ representatives \nin the national delegation for COP30 in Brazil in November next? \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Normalement! \nMr Bhagwan: This is normal. Rodrigues has special attention in our heart, as we all \nknow. So, we are preparing all the processes of participation. There is even a meeting chaired \nby the Deputy Prime Minister, and definitely when we will have to fix with regard to the \n\n52 \n \ndelegation and our participants, we will take Rodrigues into consideration, depending \nnormally on financial clearances. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: And Agalega! \nMr François: Thank you, even Agalega. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Members, the Table has been advised that the following \nPQs have been withdrawn: B/295, B/296, B/299, B/331, B/336, B/341, B/347, B/348. \nANNOUNCEMENT \nMINISTER OF LAND TRANSPORT – PQS B/297, B/298 & B/307 – OUT OF TURN \nREQUEST \nHon. Members, I have to inform the House that the hon. Minister of Land Transport has \nmade a request for PQs B/297, B/298 and B/307 be taken out of turn as he is taken up in a \ncourtesy call with Mr Jean Todt, UN Secretary-General's Special Envoy for Road Safety. I \nhave exceptionally acceded to his request.  \nSo, now, we proceed with B/297. The Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre \nBornes! Sorry! So, B/298! Same again, he is not here. B/300! \nRODRIGUES – CHILDREN’S COURT – SESSIONS & CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/294",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 294,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/294) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether in regard to registration duties payable on the \nacquisition of pre-owned vehicles already subject to a first registration in Mauritius, he will \nstate if consideration will be given for the waiving thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply (The Prime Minister): Currently, registration duty is payable by the purchaser \nof a motor vehicle, be it upon registration of the vehicle for the first time in Mauritius or on \nany subsequent registration. \nThe amount of registration duty applicable on a vehicle being registered for the first \ntime in Mauritius depends on the vehicle type and its engine capacity, while registration duty \nfor a pre-owned vehicle depends on the age of the vehicle at time of transfer in addition to the \nvehicle type and engine capacity. The amount of registration duty applicable on transfer of a \nconventional pre-owned motorcar can vary between Rs3,300 and Rs156,000. \nThe proposal to make registration duty applicable only on the first time when a vehicle \nis being registered in Mauritius was mentioned in the electoral manifesto of the Alliance du \nChangement. The measure will be considered in the context of the forthcoming budget \nexercise. \n\n114 \n \nSPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS SCHOOL – HEAD TEACHERS – SALARY \nREALIGNMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/295",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 295,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/295) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Attorney \nGeneral whether, in regard to the Children’s Court, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Master and Registrar, information as \nto the number of sessions thereof held in Rodrigues since its coming into \noperation to date, indicating the number of cases heard, and  \n(b) \nstate if consideration will be given for the establishment thereof in Rodrigues.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nOLIVIA ROMAN CATHOLIC AIDED SCHOOL – FENCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/296",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 296,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/296) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the Olivia Roman \nCatholic Aided School, he will state if he has been made aware of the poor condition of the \nfence in front of the school constituting a serious security issue to students and, if so, indicate \nif consideration will be given for the replacement of the fencing and the proposed timeframe \nfor works to be effected thereat. \n\n53",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nTOURISTS’ ARRIVAL – REASONS FOR DECLINE – REMEDIAL ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/297",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 297,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/297) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to Kooseeal Avenue, from Chemin \nBassin towards Palma Road, he will state if consideration will be given for – \n(a)  the installation of road markings, signage, cat’s eyes, speed limits and speed \nbreakers thereat, and  \n(b)  conducting a study to assess the feasibility of converting same into a one-way \ntraffic road.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, for the arrangements \nmade.  \nI am informed that Kooseeal Avenue is over a stretch of 1 km from Jawaharlal Nehru \nRoad, commonly known as Chemin Bassin, to Palma Road, Quatre Bornes. The width of \nKooseeal Avenue varies approximately between 3.5 metres and 5 metres. Part of Kooseeal \nAvenue, where the road width is approximately 3.5 metres wide, is already one-way traffic; \nthat is, from its junction with Chemin Machine up to its junction with Palma Road, the B2 \nRoad. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, given that the width of Kooseeal Avenue is less than 5.5 \nmetres wide, centre line markings cannot be provided. It is too narrow for two lanes. \nSimilarly, edge markings cannot be implemented, as this will reduce the width of the traffic \nlane. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the hon. Member will surely agree that for such a narrow road \nwhere neither a centre line nor edge markings can be provided, cat’s eyes would not be \npossible. However, stop lines have been marked at all junctions where the lateral roads \nconnect with Kooseeal Avenue. \nMoreover, 40 km speed limit signs have already been provided by the TRMSU since \nthe beginning of the year, 06 February 2025, to warn road users of the prevailing speed limit. \nThe situation is being monitored, and additional traffic calming measures or devices will be \nprovided if necessary. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, pertinent question. \nHowever, the hon. Member will surely agree that converting two-way traffic into one-way \ntraffic can sometimes be complicated, as it disturbs the traffic flow, the traffic flow patterns \n\n62 \n \nand the dynamics of the whole region. Nevertheless, I reassure the hon. Member that the \nTRMSU will consider the advisability of converting Kooseeal Avenue into one-way traffic \nafter consultations with all the relevant stakeholders, including the Municipal City Council of \nQuatre Bornes and the inhabitants of the locality. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Ms Anquetil. \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, M. le président. Would the Minister inform the House \nwhether he is aware of the numerous accidents and complaints from the residents of that front \nin this consideration? \nMr Osman Mahomed: We do get information every now and then, but after the hon. \nMember has asked the question, and the inhabitants must be thankful to her. We are paying \nparticular attention to the region now and would, like I said in my original reply, consider the \npossibility of converting it to one-way traffic. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka. \nST PIERRE VILLAGE & TRAFFIC CENTRE – LACK OF PARKING \nFACILITIES – SURVEY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/298",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 298,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/298) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the problem of traffic congestion \nin the village of St Pierre and lack of parking facilities at the St Pierre Traffic Centre, he will \nstate – \n(a) \n if any survey has been carried out by his Ministry thereinto and, if so, indicate \nthe main recommendations contained therein and if not, why not, and  \n(b) \nthe measures being envisaged to address same.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that the \nvillage of St Pierre like many other villages has seen a lot of developments taking place along \nroadsides with buildings abutting the road networks. As a result, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, \ntraffic congestion is a dire reality and remedial actions thereto are limited in as much as there \nis not enough space available to undertake any capacity enhancing measures. Because of the \nfast development that has occurred there in so far as road infrastructure are concerned. \nSpecifically, it is not possible to introduce additional traffic lanes nor a turning filter lane at \njunctions due to the already heavy built-up environment.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the \nTRMSU that due to the prevailing situation limiting the traffic mitigating actions, no specific \nengineering survey has been carried out. Moreover, the casual factors contributing to traffic \n\n63 \n \ncongestion were well-known namely; narrow roads, high vehicular movement and road side \nparking. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard to part (b) of the question, the TRMSU is \nproposing to carry out the following to alleviate the problem – \n1. \nA traffic count survey with a view to optimising traffic lights at signalised \njunctions thus reducing waiting times. \n2. \nImplementing parking restrictions along certain roads in the village in \nconsultation with the Moka District Council. \n3. \nStringent enforcement by the Police and the NLTA for parking violations. \n4. \nPromoting the use of public transportation. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, although the scope for physical upgrades is extremely limited \nin St Pierre, like I mentioned earlier, due to its heavy built-up environment, my Ministry \nremains committed to implementing operational, regulatory and planning measures in \ncollaboration with relevant stakeholders in order to improve the overall traffic condition and \ncommuting experience in the village. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Do you have any supplementary questions? \nMr Venkatasami: Would the hon. Minister consider to meet even some private land \nowners just around the traffic centre, to have meeting with them to secure some space to \nrelocate the traffic centre, please? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes, if that can facilitate. I think with the relevant authorities \nconcerned, I will be willing to meet up to see how going forward we can alleviate the \nsituation but that does not depend only on my Ministry. I think several of the Ministries and \nDepartments will have to be consulted for that purpose. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis \nCentral. \nIMMACULEE CONCEPTION SCHOOL (FORMER) - PREMISES - \nSECURING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/299",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 299,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. B/299) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Tourism whether, in regard to the decline in tourists’ arrival over the \npast three months, he will state the reasons therefor, indicating the actions being taken in \nrelation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPUBLIC SERVICE EXCELLENCE AWARD – OBJECTIVES & ELIGIBILITY \nCRITERIA – RODRIGUANS’ PARTICIPATION SCOPE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/300",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 300,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms",
      "question": "(No. B/300) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nPublic Service and Administrative Reforms whether, in regard to the Public Service \nExcellence Award, he will state the – \n(a) \nobjectives thereof;  \n(b) \neligibility criteria to participate therein, and  \n(c) \nscope of participation for public officers in Rodrigues.",
      "answer": "Mr Pentiah: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this concerns the Public Service Excellence \nAward. With regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the House that the Public \nService Excellence Award was introduced in October 2006, with the following objectives – \n(a) \nrecognising and rewarding innovative efforts of Ministries/Departments and their \nrespective divisions or units; \n(b) \nencouraging innovation and excellence in public service delivery, and \n(c) \npromoting \na \nperformance-orientated, \ncustomer-centric, \naccountable \nand \nenvironmentally conscious public service. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that the \nPublic Service Excellence Award (PSEA) was open only to ministries and departments and \ntheir respective divisions or units when the competition was launched. However, with a view \nto providing equal opportunities to all public institutions to compete on a level playing field, \nin 2021, the PSEA Framework was reviewed, and the scope of participation was broadened \nwith the creation of three distinct categories of awards, namely, Ministries and Departments, \n\n54 \n \nDisciplined Forces and local authorities. Furthermore, in 2023, parastatal bodies were also \nincluded as a separate category. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (c) of the question, it is to be pointed out \nthat the Rodrigues Regional Assembly is structured around different commissions, and as \nsuch, Rodrigues has its own specificity. Accordingly, it is considered that it would be more \nappropriate and advisable for the Rodrigues Regional Assembly to organise similar \ncompetitions among the different commissions at its own level. Of course, my ministry will \nextend all the necessary support and guidance to the Rodrigues Regional Assembly in that \nendeavour. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you! Next question, Third Member for Pamplemousses \nand Triolet! \nST MARTIN PIG FARMS – LEASE APPLICATIONS, PRODUCTION & \nINSPECTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/301",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 301,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/301) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the pig farms set up by the Ministry at St Martin, he will state the – \n(a) \nnumber of pig farmers granted leases thereat;  \n(b) \nproduction/yield compared to the optimal production capacity for the land \ndeployed thereat for pig farming;  \n(c) \nfrequency at which inspections are carried out thereat and the reports produced, \nand  \n(d) \nnumber of applications received for lease of land to operate pig farms at St Martin \nover the past five years, indicating the number thereof – \n(i) \napproved and land allocated therefor, and  \n(ii) \nturned down and the reasons therefor.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the reply being a lengthy one, I am going to table \nit. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose \nBelle! \n \n\n55 \n \nSTATE LANDS – GRAND PORT DISTRICT – SQUATTERS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/302",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 302,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/302) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the prejudice suffered by \nfamilies having lived for years in precarious condition on State lands along the southeastern \ncoastal area, he will state the measures, if any, being contemplated by his Ministry to \nregularise their situation.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nI thank the hon. Member for his question. With regard to the families living on State \nlands along the southeastern coastal area, I presume that the hon. Member is referring to \nsquatters occupying State lands in the region of the Grand Port District. \nI am informed that my Ministry has, to date, granted approximately 970 building site \nleases within the Grand Port District, spanning from Pointe aux Feuilles to Mahebourg. \nAs per the current policy, pre-July 2015 squatters are considered for regularisation \nsubject to their eligibility, availability and suitability of the concerned sites. On the other \nhand, post-July 2015 squatters are examined on a case-to-case basis. A cutoff line, obviously, \nhas to be drawn somewhere. Otherwise, we would be opening the floodgates. \nI am informed that following a survey conducted by officers of my Ministry, there are \nsome 20 squatters occupying State land in the regions of Anse Jonchée, Old Grand Port, \nRivière La Chaux, Camp Carol and Rose Belle. Out of these 20 squatters, three are pre-July \n2015, located in the regions of Rivière La Chaux, and one at Grand Sable. In addition, there \nare 16 post-July 2015 squatters, out of which 14 are located at Rivière La Chaux and one in \nthe region of Old Grand Port and Anse Jonchée, respectively. \nOur Government indeed recognises the need to provide all families living in difficult \nsituations with a secure and stable living condition. Therefore, as a rule of thumb, not specific \nto this case or those cases, the squatters may be considered for regularisation on a case-to-\ncase basis through the following measures – \n(i) \ngranting of building site lease in situ subject to planning clearance so that these \nfamilies may live a decent life; \n(ii) \nrelocating the squatters to other suitable sites where essential amenities are \navailable, and \n\n56 \n \n(iii) \nreferring those cases to the NHDC to explore the possibility of providing them \nwith a housing unit, depending on their specific circumstances. \nBut let me add, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that we should be very careful to understand \nthat there are many people on the waiting list for social housing in Mauritius, more than \n50,000, and as such, we are not a government that will encourage squatters while recognising \nthe need for houses. That is why I always like to put forward the need for all those who are \nliving in a squatting condition to register with the National Housing Development Company, \nbut remembering that we have to give priority to those who have registered first; date-wise – \nvery important indeed. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Second Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUAN PUBLIC OFFICERS – MAURITIUS TO RODRIGUES \nESTABLISHMENT –TRANSFER REQUEST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/303",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 303,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms",
      "question": "(No. B/303) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nPublic Service and Administrative Reforms whether, in regard to requests made by \nRodriguan public officers for their transfer from the Mauritius Establishment to the \nRodrigues Establishment, he will state the number thereof posted in the – \n(a) \nMauritius Prison Service;  \n(b) \nMauritius Fire and Rescue Services, and  \n(c) \nother Government department excluding the Police Force, indicating where \nmatters stand thereon.",
      "answer": "Mr Pentiah: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, may I, please, first and foremost, thank the hon. \nSecond Member for Rodrigues for his question. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that there is a total of 36 Rodriguan public \nofficers who have requested their transfer to the Establishment of the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly, and they are as follows – \n(a) \nthere are 10 Prison Officers/Senior Prison Officers, including three Women \nPrison Officers/Senior Prison Officers in the Mauritius Prison Service; \n(b) \n13 Firefighters in the Mauritius Fire and Rescue Services, and  \n(c) \n2 Nursing Officers and one temporary Attendant Hospital Services in the \nMinistry of Health and Wellness. \n\n57 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, following the setting up of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly \nin 2001, distinct establishments were set up in respect of posts under the Mauritian \nEstablishment and that of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly in the Civil Establishment \nOrder, the Mauritius Civil Establishment Order and Rodrigues, respectively. \nWhilst the posts on the Rodrigues Regional Assembly are restricted to Rodriguan \ncandidates, posts on the Mauritian Establishment are open to both Mauritian and Rodriguan \ncandidates. Accordingly, the 26 Rodriguan officers in the Mauritius Prison Service, the \nMauritius Fire and Rescue Services and the Ministry of Health and Wellness were appointed \nby the Disciplined Forces Service Commission and the Public Service Commission, \nrespectively, to serve in the post on the Mauritian Establishment.  \nSection 71 of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act provides that, and I quote – \n“(1) A public officer may, with the approval of the appropriate Service Commission, be \ntransferred to the establishment of the Regional Assembly and such transfer shall be on \nsuch terms and conditions of service as are acceptable to the appropriate Service \nCommission, the Regional Assembly and the person transferred.” \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Disciplined Forces Service Commission Regulations and \nthe Public Service Commission Regulations do not provide for the permanent transfer of \nofficers from the Mauritian establishment to the Rodrigues Regional Assembly. I am \ninformed that in the case of the three officers on the establishment of the Ministry of Health \nand Wellness, the Public Service Commission (PSC) had already informed the officers that \ntheir request cannot be considered under the existing provisions of its regulations. \nAs regards the request for permanent transfer to the Rodrigues Regional Assembly from \nthe Rodriguan officers of the Mauritius Prison Service and Mauritius Fire and Rescue \nService, protracted discussions have been held between these two commissions and \ndepartments, and advice has been sought from the AG on the matter. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in the light of the legal advice obtained and in view of the \ncomplexity and sensitivity of the issue, which requires more in-depth discussions with all \nstakeholders and subsequent amendments, which need to be brought to existing legislations, \nincluding amending the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act, which is in accordance with \nsection 75E of the Constitution, the matter is still under consideration. \nFinally, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, pending a policy decision on the matter, Rodriguan \npublic officers in the Mauritian establishment who are willing to serve in Rodrigues have the \n\n58 \n \noption to apply for and undergo the selection service appointment as Prisons Officer/Senior \nPrisons Officer, Woman Prisons Officer or Woman Prisons Officer for the firefighter \nestablishment of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly as and when vacancies are advertised. \n The Deputy Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. The hon. Third Member for Flacq \nand Bon Accueil! \nMAURICE STRATÉGIE – MANDATE, ROLE & STAFF",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/304",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 304,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/304) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked \nthe Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to Maurice \nStratégie, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the – \n(a)  mandate and role thereof, indicating the strategic support provided to \nGovernment since its coming into operation, and  \n(b)  number of staff currently posted thereat, indicating the number thereof recruited \ngrade-wise between August 2024 to November 2024.",
      "answer": "Dr. Mrs Jeetun: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Maurice Stratégie was initially set up as a \nSpecial Purpose Vehicle under the Economic Development Board. On 14 March 2023, it was \nincorporated under the Company’s Act 2001 as a private ltd company wholly owned by the \nEDB in accordance with section 5 (2) (c) of the EDB Act 2017. The EDB and Maurice \nStratégie signed a Framework Agreement on 04 May 2023 for their effective setting up of \nMaurice Stratégie. A secondment agreement was signed by the parties on the same day for the \nprovision of staff from the EDB to handle the core activities of Maurice Stratégie.  \nSubsequently, the Maurice Stratégie Board Act 2024 established Maurice Stratégie as a \nbody corporate to serve as a central research and planning bureau for Mauritius. The Act was \nassented to and gazetted on 31 July 2024 and came into force as of 16 August 2024. \nAccording to section 5 of the Maurice Stratégie Board Act 2024, the function of the \nMaurice Stratégie is to – \n1. \nConduct prospective work and inform public bodies about the possible medium- \nand long-term strategic plans that are contemplated for Mauritius. \n2. \nUndertake strategic studies to inform the government of the actions required for \nthe purpose of the preparation of reform, in particular through an analysis of the \ncontext of the decision and its foreseeable impact in the short term and medium \nterm. \n\n59 \n \n3. \nParticipate in the evaluation of government policies. \n4. \nServe as a resource centre for the identification, organisation and evaluation of \npublic consultations and debates. \n5. \nIdentify and publicise the experiences carried out abroad that may enrich \nreflection on such reforms as may be useful to Mauritius and the ways and means \nof carrying them out. \nI am also informed that the Board of Maurice Stratégie, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, which \nmet on two occasions is composed of – \n• \nthe Financial Secretary as Chairman; \n• \na representative of the Prime Minister’s Office; \n• \nevery Deputy Financial Secretary of the Ministry of Finance; \n• \nthe CEO of EDB or his representative; \n• \nthe Director of Statistics Mauritius; \n• \na representative of the Bank of Mauritius; \n• \na representative of the MRA; \n• \na representative of the private sector, and \n• \na representative of academia. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that Maurice Stratégie has been working on \nvarious projects and reports, including securing technical support from the Agence Française \nde Développement and Expertise France, whereby a resident expert is currently supporting \nMaurice Stratégie. In this context, two short-term assistant missions are also being financed \nthrough the AFD and Expertise France. \nThe Maurice Stratégie has conducted economic research and analysis, such as sectoral \ninsights from Mauritius, Economic Review and Outlook 2025, and has published a paper on \n‘Unlocking Mauritian Trade – A Situational Analysis and Opportunity Assessment Volume \n1’. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Maurice Stratégie has \nemployed 28 staff members. Following the signature of the agreement between EDB and \n\n60 \n \nMaurice Stratégie on 04 May 2023 for the provision of staff to handle the core activities of \nthe institution, nine staff, comprising seven technical staff from the Strategic Planning \nDirectorate and 2 messenger/drivers, were seconded from the EDB. \nFollowing the enactment of the Maurice Stratégie Board Act, out of the nine seconded \nstaff, eight officers employed on a permanent and pensionable establishment of the EDB \nopted to be transferred to Maurice Stratégie as of 01 July 2023 on the same terms and \nconditions governing human resources matters at the level of the EDB in accordance with \nsection 24 (1) of the Act. \nThe Head of Department of the Strategic Planning Directorate of EDB, who was \nemployed on a contractual basis since September 2015, was seconded as Officer-in-Charge to \nMaurice Stratégie on 01 July 2023. Following the institutionalisation of Maurice Stratégie, \nthe officer was appointed Executive Director on a contractual basis for a period of three years \nwith effect from 09 September 2024. \nFurthermore, one staff who has been seconded from the Ministry of Finance through \nthe enactment is currently employed as Lead Research Analyst at Maurice Stratégie from 19 \nSeptember 2024. \nIn September 2024, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Maurice Stratégie called for applications \nfrom suitable candidates to join its team. Subsequently, on 03 October 2024, an offer of \nemployment was made to the following – \n• \nsix Researchers; \n• \ntwo Senior Analysts; \n• \nfive Analysts; \n• \nthree officers, and \n• \ntwo Secretaries. \nThank you.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Now that the hon. Minister of Land Transport is in the House, \nwe will go back to PQ B/297.  \nHon. Ms Stephanie Anquetil! \n\n61 \n \nQUATRE BORNES, KOOSEEAL AVENUE – ROAD MARKINGS & \nCONVERSION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025",
        "tuesday-13-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/305",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 305,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/305) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the former \nImmaculee Conception School located at corner Jules Levieux Street and Monseigneur Leen \nStreet, Ward 4, he will state the measures taken by his Ministry to secure the premises \nthereof. \n\n64",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the former Immaculee Conception School is \nfound over a plot of State land of an extent of about 93 perches over which stands a ground \nplus one concrete building. The then Minister of Education, Tertiary Education, Science and \nTechnology informed the then Ministry of Housing and Land Use Planning on 01 December \n2021 that the former Immaculee Conception School is no longer being used for educational \npurposes since 2017. \nIf I may add, in fact, when I perused the letter that was sent to the Senior Chief \nExecutive of my Ministry on 01 December 2021. One of the paragraphs of that letter, Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, I can read and I quote – \n“In light of the above, and given that the site is no longer being used by the Ministry \nsince 2017, it would be appreciated if your Ministry can take back control of the land \nand ensure necessary and appropriate measures be taken accordingly”. \nNothing was done ever since 2021, to make it worse, nothing was done ever since \n2017. So, for all those years this school was left in a totally abandoned state. The classrooms \nare clearly being used by people dealing in meshed things which are totally unlawful. There \nis rubbish and overgrown grass. It is totally insalubre and this is in the middle of the capital \ncity of Port Louis. \nSo, I wonder, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, why is it that the then hon. Minister of Housing \nand Land, when he – if I am not mistaken very close to where they had shown some interest \nto obtain some Land – so, how is it that he seems to be unaware, at least in those days, of \nanything going on with any State land in that particular region. So, he said, but I do not \nbelieve it. So, nothing was done, the building that once housed the former Immaculee \nConception School, as I said, haven for illegal activities.  \nNow, there are two options available, one, to inform the Ministry of Local Government \nthrough City Council of Port Louis to initiate cleaning of the site and then under sections 128 \nand 129 of Local Government Act to make provisions for shoring up and securing the \nbuilding but there is another option. The other option is to retrieve the land altogether. This \nwas what was requested for ever since 2021 and so many years later on whilst the others were \nasleep at the helm. Now, we are not asleep at the helm, and we will do what needs to be done. \n93 perches in the middle of capital and when we are looking for land, the elected members of \nthat Constituency, all of them have been looking for land in order to put up projects, there we \ngo, land is available and was sleeping there and the former Government did not bother. \nSo, I thank the hon. Member for that question; I have given instructions already to the \nSenior Chief Executive of my Ministry to retrieve, to take it back and then I shall consult \n\n65 \n \nwith the hon. Members from Constituency No. 2 in order to find out together with themselves \nand other future, soon to be elected, members of the alliance of the Municipal Council to \ndecide on the proper way forward to make use of that prime property.  \nI would like to thank the hon. Member once again for having put that question because \nthat question brought me to a document that shows that back in 1962, and if I am not \nmistaken, it could be, it was Mohamed, the first Minister of Housing and Lands in our family \nwho was the one who gave the lease for that school. So, it is quite an interesting matter with \nhistory that I am dealing with it today in order to give it back its letter de gloire. Thank you \nvery much. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, one supplementary! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. This property, this premises is in an \nextreme derelict state, lying in the city of Port Louis. May I ask the hon. Minister as a matter \nof urgency and a short term measure, whether he could liaise with the Commissioner of \nPolice to ensure that this premises is not being used as a drug den daily and also harbouring \npetty criminals on a 24/7 basis at the moment, just immediate measures for the security of the \ninhabitants living in the surroundings? Thank you. \nMr Mohamed: I thank the hon. Member for his concern and I think that his concerns \nare totally called-for and very legitimate. I must therefore beg leave to table four photographs \nof the site in question that will show exactly the very bad state these premises are in. As in, \nwe have already contacted the Commissioner of Police and the officers in order to do the \nneedful.  \nI have been speaking about this problem with my hon. colleague, the Minister of \nEnvironment, who has graciously offered his services and his help in order to clean up the \nsite and I thank him for that.  \nHowever, I am of the view and I say it again, that those premises could be used for \nother projects as the Constituency No. 2 has been calling for but it seems that for the past ten \nyears, no one was listening. \nThank you very much.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, next question. Hon. Third Member for Mahebourg and \nPlaine Magnien! \nSHELTERED FARMING PROJECT, PLAINE MAGNIEN – BENEFICIARIES \n& REALLOCATION \n\n66",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/306",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 306,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/306) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg &Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to sheltered farming park at Plaine Magnien, he will state and table a list of the \nbeneficiaries thereof, indicating – \n(a) \nif all the units have been leased and are under cultivation, and \n(b) \nthe amount of rent due, if any, by each beneficiary and, if so, further indicate if \nconsideration will be given for the re-allocation thereof in case of default.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, hon. Member.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the sheltered farming project at Plaine Magnien, is a \nresounding failure of the previous government. \nPhase I of the project was meant for young, unemployed graduates to gain skills and \nexperience in entrepreneurship in the agricultural sector. The project was launched in April \n2018 with the setting up of 10 net houses of 2000 square metre each and equipped with \nelectrically powered irrigation system costing a sum of around Rs15 million.  \nTheses net houses were allocated to trainees who had followed training in basic \nsheltered farming system. However, one of them withdrew from the programme and the net \nhouse was reallocated to Food and Agricultural and Research Extension Institute which is \nrunning a demonstration centre thereat.  \nI am informed that no lease agreement has been signed with the trainees in respect of \nthe allocated net houses and that no rent has been paid.  \nWith your permission, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am tabling the list of beneficiaries \nunder this project. I am informed that at present, only two beneficiaries are active on sites \nbesides Food and Agricultural and Research Extension Institute. The remaining ones have \nabandoned the site due to inter-alia problems associated with bedrocks on the plots that were \nallocated, damaged to netting systems occasioning entry of birds and pests and inadequate \nmonitoring and follow-up by FAREI. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Phase II of the sheltered farming park at Plaine Magnien, \ncomprising 20 net houses of approximately 2000 square metres each was completely in \nNovember 2020 for an amount of Rs36.8 million. None of the units has been allocated since \n2020 due to the non-availability of water and electricity; clearly demonstrating poor \n\n67 \n \nmanagement and lack of overall coordination of the project where more than Rs50 million of \ntaxpayers’ money had already been invested. \nOver the years, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the unoccupied net houses under both phases \nhave reached a deplorable state. While vegetation has grown within the net houses and the \nsurrounding areas, the nets and drip lines have been damaged and accessories and fittings \nhave been stolen from the pump houses. \nI am advised that the cost of rehabilitation of one net house is estimated at around \nRs600,000; this sum excludes the cost of supplying water from the boreholes to the net \nhouse. An amount of Rs5 million has been made available in the budget for current financial \nyear for the rehabilitation of net houses at Ville Bague and Plaine Magnien but this amount \nobviously is insufficient to rehabilitate both phases of the project at Plaine Magnien. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is clear that this project has been plagued by serious \nshortcomings and serious negligence. Out of the 30 net houses, only three are being currently \noperated and none of the 20 net houses of the second Phase has ever been allocated to date. \nConsidering that the shift from opened field to sheltered farming is one of the means of \nimproving production capacity in the face of adverse impact of climate change, the project \nneeds to be revisited.  \nI have given firm instructions to the Senior Chief Executive and Food and Agricultural \nand Research Extension Institute to review the sheltered farming project.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay. Next question, hon. Third Member for Montagne Blanche \nand Grand River South East! \nMELROSE-DEEP RIVER ROAD – COVERED BUS STOPS – SURVEY & \nMAINTENANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/307",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 307,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/307) Mr R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to public transport, he will \nstate if his Ministry has carried out a survey to assess the need for covered bus stops along the \nroute from Melrose to Deep River and, if so, indicate the findings thereof and actions \nproposed in relation thereto, if any.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Road \nDevelopment Authority that along the road from Melrose to Deep River – classified road \nnetwork – there are 44 covered bus stops and around 12 bus stops which are covered.  \n\n68 \n \nWith regard to the covered bus stops, 15 of these constitute of iron sheets which require \nsome uplifting. I am also informed that the RDA will accordingly proceed with painting and \nrepair works thereat.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am also informed by the TMRSU that following a survey \ncarried out, it has been observed that 6 bus stops from Sebastopol to Deep River have to be \nupgraded. Inasmuch as the Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit does not currently \nhave a framework to allocate work to a designated contractor, like usually this is the case, \nbecause same has expired; a fresh tender exercise is being floated for the contractor to \nundertake such jobs. The RDA could consider upgrading these bus stops the more so, they \nare located on classified road and also, if it is deemed to be in the interest of time.  \nElse, once the contractor of the TMRSU has been selected, the TMRSU can undertake \nthe works.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question, hon. Second Member for Grand’ Baie and \nPoudre d’Or! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 6 – PIPE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/308",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 308,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/308) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre D'or) asked \nthe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the pipe replacement \nprojects undertaken in the village of, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCentral Water Authority, information as to where matters stand, indicating – \n(a) \nwhen remedial works will be undertaken for the resurfacing of Triangle Road up \nto La Boutique Perron and Melle Jeanne, in Goodlands, and  \n(b) \nthe expected completion date thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: M. le président, la CWA m’informe qu’un total de 3,4 km des tuyaux \nont été remplacés dans la région de Goodlands dans le cas des deux contrats PME. \nEn ce qui concerne la remise en état des routes, je suis également informé que les \ntravaux le long de Telugu Temple Road, Piver Avenue et une partie de Triangle Road ont \ndéjà été achevés. Pour le chemin Triangle Road jusqu’à La Boutique Perron et Mademoiselle \nJeanne, la CWA avait lancé un contrat distinct pour la remise en état de la route.  Cependant, \ncomme je l’ai expliqué dans ma réponse à la question B/219 lors de notre séance du 25 mars \n2025, M. le président, le coût du projet ayant était dépassé, la CWA ne peut actuellement pas \nprocéder à l’attribution des contrats pour la réfection des routes.  \n\n69 \n \nUne demande de financement supplémentaire a été déposée au ministère des Finances \net cela est en cours d’examen. La CWA a lancé un appel d’offres pour l’exercice 2025-2026, \nafin de financer un nouvel appel d’offre pour la remise en état des routes. L’attribution du \ncontrat est prévue pour septembre 2025 et l’achèvement des travaux, on espère, est prévu \npour octobre 2025. \nMr Beejan: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, will the hon. Minister implement strict \nmechanism to prevent similar delays in future projects, particularly in densely populated \nareas? \nMr Assirvaden: Oui. We will.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question, hon. Second Member for Grand’Baie and Poudre \nd’Or! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 6 – LODGING ACCOMMODATION PERMIT – \nINSPECTION TIME FRAME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025",
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/309",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 309,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/309) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to Lodging \nAccommodation Permit, he will state the – \n(a) \nexpected time frame for an inspection to be carried out upon receipt of a new \napplication therefor, and \n(b) \nnumber of permits granted in Constituency No. 6, Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or \nsince 2019 to 2024, giving details thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Uteem: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, lodging accommodation for foreign migrant \nworkers is governed by the Occupational Safety and Health Act 2005 and the Occupational \nSafety and Health Employees Lodging Accommodation Regulation 2011.  \nWith regard to Part (a) of the question, I am informed that the expected time frame for \nan inspection to be carried out by officers of my Ministry upon receipt of an application for \nLodging Accommodation Permit, is normally 5 working days.  \nHowever, I am informed that the lodging accommodating permit is usually issued \nwithin a month after receipt of the application at the National Occupational Safety and Health \ndepartment of my Ministry. \n\n70 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it should however be noted that when submitting an \napplication for lodging accommodation permit to my Ministry, health and fire clearance \nshould accompany the application and the obtention of those clearances from the Ministry of \nHealth and Wellness and from the Mauritius Fire and Rescue Services may take quite some \ntime even several months. The reason for that is very often, the accommodation has to be \nmodified physically to meet the requirements of the Ministry of Health and fire clearances. \nNow, the inter-ministerial committee set up to look into the whole issue of migrant \nworkers is considering how to streamline the process to reduce the time it takes to get the \nlodging accommodation permit. For the time being, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, an applicant \nwishing to recruit foreign workers needs to get the lodging accommodation permit first and \nthen apply for the work permit. While he is applying for the work permit, he has to pay rent \nsometimes for several months.  \nSo, what is being proposed by the committee now is to have a system of parallel \napplication. So, at the time an employer will apply for a work permit, at the same time, he \nwill apply for a lodging accommodation permit. Then, once he receives it, he will be able to \ndo it. Consideration is also being given to the possibility of issuing lodging accommodation \npermit to the owner of the building who will then be able to lease the whole or part of the \nbuilding to different employers.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, concerning part (b) of the question, the number of permits \nwhich have been granted in Constituency No. 6, Grand Baie and Poudre d’Or for the period \n2019 to 2024, including both new and renewed permits, is 229. I am tabling the breakdown of \nthe number of permits issued in Constituency No. 6 from 2019 to 2024. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Jhummun! \nMr Jhummun: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Can the hon. Minister inform the \nHouse, once such a permit has been provided, how frequent inspections are made and what \nare the measures taken for non-compliance? Thank you. \nMr Uteem: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, inspections are regularly carried out after a LAP \nhas been issued either on an ad hoc basis or following a complaint received from either the \nmigrant worker or more often from the trade unionists. For example, for the period 2024 to \nFebruary 2025, 91 follow up visits were carried out at the employee’s lodging \naccommodation, including joint visits with the Ministry of Health and the Mauritius Fire \nServices. \n\n71 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question! \nMr Jhummun: What actions are taken for non-compliance? \nMr Uteem: Well, for the time being, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Occupational Safety \nand Health (Employees' Lodging Accommodation) Regulations 2011 makes provision, under \nRegulation 23, for the enforcement authority – usually, it is my Ministry – to serve an \nenforcement notice on the employer so that he has a delay to comply with that enforcement \nnotice. If not, then, the lodging accommodation permit is revoked and the employer will then \nhave to make alternative provisions to accommodate the employees. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, the hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues, hon. Edouard! \n14th MONTH BONUS – PAYMENT – NON-COMPLIANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/310",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 310,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/310) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nLabour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to the payment of the 14th month end of \nyear bonus, he will state the number of companies which have not complied therewith, \nindicating – \n(a) \nthe reasons therefor; \n(b) \nif his Ministry is in presence of such a complaint from employees of Brilliant \nCleaning Services Ltd., and \n(c) \nthe measures taken against these companies, if any.",
      "answer": "Mr Uteem: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the population will recall that despite the difficult \neconomic situation that we inherited, Government introduced in December last year the \nSpecial Allowance 14th month bonus for some 420,200 employees from both the private and \npublic sectors as well as a one-month allowance to every pensioner, widow, orphan and \ndisabled person in Mauritius. \n The Special Allowance Act 2024 provides for a one-off payment of a special allowance \nto employees drawing a monthly basic salary not exceeding Rs50,000 or equivalent to one-\nmonth basic salary. \nAs far as employees who have been in continuous employment for only part of the year, \nthe employee or his legal representative is entitled to a special allowance on a pro rata basis \nin line with section 3 (3) of the Act. Special allowance, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, is payable as \nfollows – \n\n72 \n \n“In two equal instalments where – \n(i) \nthe first instalment is paid not later than on the last working day of December \n2024, and \n(ii) \nthe last instalment is paid on the last working day of January 2025. \nOr alternatively, in case there is an agreement between the employer and an employee, \nthe payment can be done in not more than four instalments.” \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, since the enactment of the Special Allowance Act in December \nlast year, I am informed as at end of February 2025, 1,503 complaints in relation to non-\ncompliance with the Special Allowance Act were received from employees against 321 \nemployers comprising 291 companies and 30 individual employers. \nRegarding part (a) of the question, the main reason put forward by employers for non-\ncompliance is financial constraint faced by them. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Act does \nprovide that the Director General of the Mauritius Revenue Authority can provide financial \nassistance in connection with the payment of special allowance to qualifying export \nenterprises, qualifying SMEs and other employers falling within a category as may be \nprescribed. There has been a regulation in February 2025, the Income Tax (Financial \nAssistance for Payment of Special Allowance) Regulations 2025 where the category of \neligible companies for refund has been set out and they include – \n(a) \nCharitable institutions; \n(b) \nNon-Government Organizations (NGOs) registered with the National Social \nInclusion Foundation; \n(c) \nRegistered Religious bodies; \n(d) \nTrade Unions; and \n(e) \nEnterprises other than export enterprise or SMEs, whose turnover for the Year \nof Assessment 2023/2024 does not exceed Rs750 million and who are operating \nin the following sectors – \n(i) \nBusiness Processing Outsourcing (BPO); \n(ii) \nSecurity or Cleaning Services, and \n(iii) \nConstruction Industry. \n\n73 \n \nIn addition, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, financial support has been extended to enterprises \nin the transportation sector facing financial difficulties to pay the special allowance. I have \nbeen informed by the MRA that 10,570 eligible employers have employed for the financial \nassistance, out of which, 8,677 employers have submitted a special allowance return 2024. \nPayments have already been effected to 8,041 compliant employers for a total amount of Rs1, \n052, 051,539.  \nHowever, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have to stress that one of the problems which the \neligible employers are facing when making a claim to the MRA is that under the provisions of \nthe law, the employer is required to pay the special allowance and then claim a refund from \nthe MRA. Now, there are a number of employers who are not paying the special allowance \nand making claims for refund by the MRA. That is what is causing delay. So, even though \nthey may be eligible to get the refund because they have not paid the special allowance, MRA \nis not giving them the money back. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, on 15 January 2025, my Ministry received \ncomplaints from 12 Indian workers to the effect that they have not been paid the special \nallowance 2024 by Brilliant Cleaning Services Ltd. They had also not been remunerated for \nNovember and December and did not receive end of year bonus. After the intervention of \nofficers of my Ministry, their outstanding salaries have been settled. However, the company is \nyet to pay them their end of year bonus and their special allowance. \nOn 28 March 2025, the company agreed to pay the outstanding amount in three \ninstalments, on 10 April, 10 May and 10 June 2025. On 10 March 2025, the Chemin Grenier \nLabour Office received a complaint from 16 local employees of Brilliant Cleaning Services \nLtd – the same company – for non-payment of special allowance. When contacted, the \nDirector informed my Ministry that payment could not be effected due to acute financial \nconstraint. I am informed by the MRA that although Brilliant Cleaning Services Ltd is \neligible to apply for the refund through MRA, they have not done so, so far.  \nConcerning part (c) of the question, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, investigation is ongoing \nby enforcement officers of my Ministry with regard to those cases where special allowance \nhas not been paid when due. As at February 2025, out of 1,503 complaints received, only \nseven cases were rejected, 41 cases withdrawn by employees and 151 cases were settled. The \nsettled cases represent a total amount of Rs2.6 m. recovered on behalf of workers after the \n\n74 \n \nintervention of officers of my Ministry. The remaining cases are still under investigation by \nmy Ministry.  \nI wish to highlight that any employer who fails to comply with the provision of the \nSpecial Allowance Act shall commit an offense, and shall on conviction be liable to a fine not \nexceeding Rs5,000. 91 cases against six employers have already been referred to the \nProsecution Unit of my Ministry in order for criminal action to be taken against them. Before \nlodging the information at the Industrial Court, my Ministry has liaised with the Mauritius \nRevenue Authority to confirm whether these employers are eligible for financial assistance \nand have received the financial assistance. The reply from the MRA is awaited. \nAllow me to assure the House and workers of this country that criminal action will be \ntaken against all those employers who are not eligible to financial assistance and who are still \nnot complying with the provisions of the Special Allowance Act. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member? \nMr Edouard: I thank the hon. Minister for his answer. I would like to ask the hon. \nMinister if the refund is related to CSG compliance. \nMr Uteem: I do not know the mechanism which the MRA is doing, whether it is using \nthe funds of CSG to pay it or otherwise. I am only informed that the MRA refunds all the \namount of money that is being paid by qualifying employers as required under the Special \nAllowance Act Regulations. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, next question, the hon. Third Member for Port Louis \nSouth and Port Louis Central! \n᠎PUBLIC HOSPITALS – RADIOLOGY SERVICES – OUTSOURCING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025",
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/311",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 311,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/311) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to radiological \ninvestigations carried out in public hospitals over the past four years to date, he will state – \n(a) \nthe number of MRI's and CT scan apparatus available and in use; \n(b) \nif the radiologists employed in this department are reporting on the MRI's and CT \nscans carried out and, if not, why not, and  \n\n75 \n \n(c) \nif the services of radiologists from abroad have been retained therefor and, if so, \ngive details on the contractual agreement thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that the number of \nMRIs and CT scan apparatus available in our public hospitals are four and seven, \nrespectively. Three out of four MRIs and six out of seven CT scan apparatus are functional \nand are being used. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, consultants in charge and radiologists of the \nradiology department are reporting on MRIs and CT scans on a 24/7 basis per semi-urgent \nward and emergency cases. As there are no MRI services at Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital for the \ntime being, the department of radiology at the Dr. A.G. Jeetoo Hospital is carrying out the \nMRI imaging services once per week for cases referred by the Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital. \nThe same radiologists posted at the Dr. A.G. Jeetoo Hospital also carry out MRIs for cases \nreferred by Victoria Hospital after working hours for emergency cases. These arrangements \nhave been put in place to ensure continuous access of MRI services. \nAt the Seewoosagur Ramgoolam National Hospital, the CT scans and MRIs are all \nfunctional and are all covered under the maintenance and repair contract to ensure optimum \nperformance and minimise breakdowns. In addition, my Ministry has initiated procurement \nfor acquisition of MRI and CT scan apparatus for Flacq Hospital. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, regarding part (c) of the question, I wish to inform the House \nthat in view of the increasing number of patients awaiting reporting of the MRI and CT scans \nto decide on the way forward for further clinical management, it was decided to refer imaging \nto private clinics for reporting. Quotations were invited from private clinics with expression \nof interest, and clinics proposing the lowest prices were selected for outsourcing of the MRI \nand CT scan reporting. I am informed that since March 2024, three private clinics have been \nenlisted for referral of reporting in respect of routine non-urgent cases of MRI and CT scans \ndone at the level of regional hospitals. I am also informed that the enlisted clinics are \nremunerated as at date. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Aumeer. \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. There is a contractual agreement that \nis happening between the Ministry of Health and private clinics for reporting of CT scans and \nMRIs. It is very unfortunate, and I have a document at hand, that the people who are \n\n76 \n \nreporting these MRIs/CT scans are not registered – some of them – to the Medical Council of \nthis country, thus posing a serious threat when it comes to medical legal issues.  \nThose who are reporting them are not even on site in Mauritius, thereby depriving the \npatient the clinical picture and that is why there has been serious mistakes whereby a woman \nwho has lost her uterus was told she still has one. So, I will urge the hon. Minister to see to it \nthat primary reporting of MRIs and CT scans are done by our local radiologists and adhere to \nsecondary reporting or second opinion with offsite radiologists from abroad. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Minister. \nMr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we have a big problem as far as radiologists are \nconcerned. We have a lack of such radiologists in our country, a big lack in most of the \nhospitals. Secondly, I am not aware whether outsourcing was done from abroad but I will \nlook into the issue, I can promise, if I can get a copy of paper which you have with you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, you have a supplementary on that question? \nMr Edouard: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is reported that the scan apparatus in \nRodrigues is out of order. Will the hon. Minister look into it, please? \nMr Bachoo: Yes, I will. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River \nSouth East! \nPEPSI LANE & BRAMSTHAN ROAD, ECROIGNARD – REMEDIAL WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/312",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 312,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/312) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to Pepsi Lane and Bramsthan Road \nin Ecroignard and Bramsthan, respectively, he will state if he has been made aware of \ndeplorable state thereof and, if so, indicate when remedial works will be carried out thereat \nand the expected completion date thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that Pepsi Lane at Ecroignard is \nan area prone to localised water accumulation during heavy rainfall. The capacity of the \nexisting absorption drain is not enough to capture high volumes of water, thereby causing \ngreat inconvenience to pedestrians. \n\n77 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed that the National Development Unit had \nawarded a contract for the construction of an absorption drain at Pepsi Road, Ecroignard on \n08 July 2024 to mitigate the flooding and water accumulation thereat for a contract value of \nRs2.29 m. However, during excavation works, basalt strata was encountered. In order not to \nput at risk the existing services and causing any infrastructural damages to residential \nbuildings in the surrounding, upon instructions from the NDU, the contractor stopped the \nworks immediately. He was thereafter requested to proceed with the proper backfilling and \ncompaction of the excavated trench and provide for a temporary reinstatement and open the \nroad to traffic. The contract for the absorption drain was eventually terminated. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, to tackle the problem of flooding in the region in a holistic \nmanner, I have been advised that a consultant would have to be appointed to carry out a study \nfor the drainage works and relocation of the major CWA services. Bids will accordingly be \nlaunched early May 2025. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am also informed that the Central Water Authority had \nexcavated two pits at Pepsi Road which will be reinstated by the latter’s contractor on 14 \nApril 2025. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to the region of Bramsthan, I am informed that \npipe replacement works are actually being carried out along several roads by the Central \nWater Authority. 4.62 km of permanent reinstatement works have been completed and as at \ndate, around 1.28 km is outstanding at Dominique Road, Kalimaye Road No. 1, Shivala Road \nand Kalipa Road. It is expected that the remaining reinstatement works will be undertaken by \nthe Central Water Authority’s contractor as from next week and would be completed in one \nweek’s time.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you! Hon. Second Member for Savanne and Rivière \nNoire! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 14 – OPERATIONAL DISPENSARIES – ACCESSIBILITY& \nPARKING FACILITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/313",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 313,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member of Savanne Riviere Noire (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/313) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the dispensaries serving the region \nof Savanne-Riviere Noire, he will state the – \n(a) \nnumber thereof currently operational, and  \n\n78 \n \n(b) \naccessibility and parking facilities available at the dispensary situated in a rented \nbuilding at Baie du Cap, indicating if consideration will be given for the \nrelocation thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that in Constituency No. 14, \nSavanne-Rivière Noire, there is one Area Health Centre which is located at Chemin Grenier \nand eight Community Health Centres which are located in the following villages – \n• \nBambous Virieux; \n• \nCase Noyale; \n• \nChamarel; \n• \nChamouny; \n• \nFlic-en-Flac; \n• \nLa Gaulette; \n• \nTamarin, and \n• \nBaie du Cap. \nAll the nine health facilities are currently operational. \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that \nBaie du Cap Community Health Centre is housed in an old rented building which is facing \naccessibility and parking issues. Attempts have, however, been made by my Ministry since \n2017 to relocate the Baie du Cap Community Health Centre to a more appropriate location. \nAll the lands identified within the region for the construction of a new community health \ncentre were found to be unsuitable due to the risk of flooding and sloping topography of the \ngrounds. Furthermore, several expressions of interest were launched by the Ministry since \nApril 2016 to rent another facility within Baie du Cap to house the community health centre. \nHowever, there were no responsive bidders during all these exercises. \nI am also informed that a new commercial centre is being constructed at Baie du Cap \nVillage and discussions are ongoing between the private developer and my Ministry to look \ninto the possibility of renting a designated space within the building to relocate the \ncommunity health centre. \n\n79 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, at the same time, the possibility of requesting the Ministry of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries to release the existing fisheries \npost at Baie du Cap, which is apparently not being used for the past eight years, is also being \nlooked into.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Babajee! \nMr Babajee: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Will the Minister consider to have a \nsite visit at those community centres, especially for Case Noyale Community Centre? \nMr Bachoo: Within a week, I will do it. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question! Hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite \nRivière! \nMETHADONE SUBSTITUTION THERAPY PROGRAMME – BUDGET \nEARMARKED & DISPENSING SITES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/314",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 314,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/314) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Methadone Therapy \nSubstitution Programme, he will state the – \n(a) \nannual amount budgeted therefor since 2019 to date;  \n(b) \nplaces of distribution thereof region-wise, indicating the number of patients \nattending each collecting point, and  \n(c) \nnumber of patients who have successfully completed the programme, on a yearly \nbasis, since 2019 to date.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that there is no specific budget \nallocated for Methadone Substitution Therapy Programme as expenses are being incurred \nunder different items under the budget of my Ministry. \n \nHowever, the House may wish to note that the approximate amount spent for the \npurchase of methadone and other related course and allowances for the Methadone \nSubstitution Therapy Programme from 2019 to 2024 are as follows – \n• \nfor Financial Year 2018-2019, Rs40,585,832; \n• \nfor Financial Year 2019-2020, Rs42,334,842; \n• \nfor Financial Year 2020-2021, Rs57,593,713; \n\n80 \n \n• \nfor Financial Year 2021-2022, Rs46,389,430; \n• \nfor Financial Year 2022-2023, Rs60,402,179, and \n• \nfor Financial Year 2023-2024, Rs57,524,788. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that as at February 2025, there \nare a total number of 8,851 patients receiving their daily doses of methadone in 75 dispensing \nsites around the island.  \nThe number of patients attending the different dispensing points region-wise is being \ntabled.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (c) of the question, it is widely accepted \nthat the assessment of recovery from drug addiction is inherently complex, owing to the \nmultifaceted nature of the addiction itself. In essence, the complexity of assessing drug \naddiction recovery stems from the interplay of individual variability, multi-dimensional \nfactors, measurement challenges and the dynamic nature of the recovery process itself. \nHence, the exact number of patients who have successfully completed the programme cannot \nbe determined. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes! \nMr Quirin: M. le président, la méthadone, comme tout le monde le sait, est un produit \nde substitution qui est devenu, malheureusement, un produit d’addiction pour de nombreux \npatients. Donc, l’honorable ministre peut-il dire à la Chambre s’il envisage d’autres types de \nprogrammes plus efficaces, et si, oui, lesquels ? \nMr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in the days to come, we will be having a \nlegislation on this particular issue. I will request you to be a bit patient, you will get it.  \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Pertaining to the question! \n \nMr Quirin: M. le président, donc, probablement, l’honorable ministre est au courant \nque dans certains pays, il y a le suboxone qui est privilégié à la méthadone, de par son \npotentiel d’abus plus faible et un niveau de dépendance physique aussi plus faible. Donc, s’il \nest au courant que ce produit existe, est-ce que ce traitement peut être considéré et peut-on \nsavoir quand, à-peu-près, compte-t-il venir de l’avant avec ce programme alternatif ? \n\n81 \n \nMr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am not a medical practitioner. As I have just \nsaid, we are having a new legislation. Please, be patient. Definitely, we will have certain \nchanges. \n The Deputy Speaker: Hon. Member, the new law is coming for First Reading today. \nNext time, the hon. Member can have an opportunity to address the House on the Bill and \nmake any suggestion he wants. So, let’s proceed with the next question. Thank you. \nHon. Members, I have been advised that the following PQs have been withdrawn: \nB/317, B/320, B/327, B/328, B/329, B/340, B/349, and B/350. \nNow, we proceed with the next question. Hon. Second Member of Savanne and Rivière \nNoire! \nMARTINIÈRE RESERVOIR, SURINAM – OPERATION – REMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/315",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 315,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member of Savanne Riviere Noire (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/315) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the Martinière Reservoir at \nSurinam, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, \ninformation as to whether same is currently operational and, if not, why not, indicating the \nremedial measures being envisaged in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: M. le président, la CWA m’a informé que le réservoir de service de la \nMartinière à Surinam a été mis hors service en 2016 suite à la construction d’un nouveau \nréservoir à Mont Blanc d’une capacité de stockage de 255 mètres cubes.  Le réservoir de \nservice de la Martinière était insuffisant pour répondre à la demande croissante en eau dans la \nrégion. De plus, en raison de son usure, des fuites ont été constatées dans le réservoir.  \nUn nouveau réservoir de service d’une capacité de stockage de 2 000 mètres cubes a été \nconstruit à Mont Blanc. Situé en altitude, il alimente, donc, directement en eau la Martinière, \nSurinam et une partie de Riambel.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question! Hon. First Member for Montagne Blanche and \nGrand River South East! \nVIRGIN OIL MAURITIUS LTD – TOXIC AIR POLLUTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/316",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 316,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/316) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, \nin regard to the Virgin Oil Mauritius Ltd., situated in Montagne Blanche, he will state if he \n\n82 \n \nhas been made aware of the hazardous and toxic air pollution emanating therefrom and, if so, \nindicate the measures being envisaged to address this issue.",
      "answer": "Mr Bhagwan: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the House may wish to note that an \nEnvironmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Licence was granted to Virgin Oil Company \n(Mauritius) Ltd on 27 February 2006 for the setting up of a recycling facility for the refining \nof used lube oil at Montagne Blanche. The operation of the refinery last started in year 2012. \nI am informed that no complaint has been registered at the level of my Ministry with \nregard hazardous and toxic air pollution emanating from that company. I am further informed \nthat the Environmental Health Engineering Unit of the Ministry of Health and Wellness has \nalso not been made aware of any hazardous or toxic air pollution thereon. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, however, I wish to inform the House that my Ministry received \none complaint on 21 January 2025 and two additional complaints on 07 March relating to \nodour nuisance, emanating from Virgin Oil Company (Mauritius) Ltd. In view of the \nrecurrent odour nuisance complaints received during the last 8 years, I am informed that an \nadditional condition relating to the submission of a detailed odour management and \nmonitoring plan by the company to the Ministry of Health and Wellness was imposed in the \nEIA License by my Ministry on 05 October 2021.  \nIn fact, these complaints have been jointly addressed through several site inspections in \ncollaboration with the Ministry of Health and Wellness. Pursuant to section 21 and Fifth \nSchedule of the Environment Act 2024, the Ministry of Health and Wellness is the enforcing \nagency for odour nuisance. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed that in line with conditions contained in \nthe EIA License, the Virgin Oil Company (Mauritius) Ltd. has implemented the following \nmitigating measures. Refined replant is equipped with a wet scrubber, all equipment is \nenclosed in corrugated iron sheets and Ashoka trees have been planted around boundaries to \nact as greenbelt. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, an ambient air monitoring was also conducted on 03 April by \nthe National Environmental Laboratory of my Ministry to assess the ambient air quality \nprevailing in the nearby residential areas located within Montagne Blanche along 500 to 700 \nmetres of Virgin Oil Company Mauritius Ltd. Results revealed that toxic gases screened on \nall sites, namely ammonia, nitrogen dioxide, benzene, toluene, hydrogen sulphide and \nnaphthalene, compiled with the lowest observed adverse effect in level limit as specified by \n\n83 \n \nthe United States Environmental Protection Agency. Besides the measured concentration \nlevel of the parameter, total organic volatile compounds were compliant with the guidelines \nof the WHO. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that my Ministry has promulgated \nthe Environment Protection (Collection, Storage, Treatment, Use and Disposal of Waste Oil) \nRegulations 2006 and it is ensuring that the company abides to its provisions. My Ministry \nwill continue to monitor closely the situation and will take appropriate actions. \n \nHOTEL DIVING CENTRE – ACCIDENT 20 MARCH 2025 – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/317",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 317,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. B/317) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Tourism whether, in regard to the tragic accident which occurred on 20 \nMarch 2025 at a diving center found within a hotel compound in the north of the island, he \nwill state if his Ministry has carried out an inquiry thereinto and, if so, indicate the outcomes \nthereof and the actions taken, if any, to avoid the recurrence thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien! \nRESIDENCE CITÉ LA CHAUX – STATE LAND – LEASEHOLDERS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/318",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 318,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/318) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to State land at Residences Cité \nLa Chaux, he will state the number of leaseholders thereof, indicating the mechanism, if any, \nput in place at the Ministry to regularise these leases and/or if consideration will be given to \namending the law to make the lessees owners of their lands.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that there are three scenarios at \nCité La Chaux, Mahebourg found on Pas Géométriques Rivière La Chaux. \nFirst, there are two ex-CHA housing states, namely – \n• \nResidence La Chaux A, and  \n• \nResidence La Chaux B comprising some 304 families who are owners of the ex-\nCHA housing units and are holders of State land leases en bonne et due forme \nover the plot of land on which stand their houses.  \n\n84 \n \nApplications for renewal or transfer of leases and subdivision of the plot of land are \nprocessed by my Ministry as and when received. \nSecondly, I am informed by my Ministry that 51 families who were squatting on State \nland adjoining Residence La Chaux B Housing Estates and three families who were squatting \non surplus of land within ex-CHA Housing Estates have been regularised and granted \nbuilding site pieces over the plots of land in 2005 and 2016, respectively. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am also informed that there are squatters on some plots of \nState land at Cité La Chaux and officers of my Ministry are carrying out a survey to assess \nthe real situation on site and take any action as may be appropriate. Allow me at this juncture \nto point out that even though this is not within the scope of this question, officers of my \nMinistry are indeed carrying out a survey to find out about the squatting situation, squatters \nall over Mauritius, in order to apprise oneself of the real situation nationally.  \nAs regards whether consideration will be given to amending the law to make the lessees \nowners of their plots of land, I wish to refer the hon. Member to replies I made to the House \nto PQ B/38 and PQ B/118 on 04 February 2025 and 04 March 2025, respectively to the effect \nthat Pas Géométriques are inalienable and imprescriptibles. Consequently, the individual \nplots of State land at Cité La Chaux cannot be sold to occupiers as per Section 5 of the State \nLands Act. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Members, I have been advised that PQs B/321, B/334, \nB/339 and B/354 have been withdrawn.  \nSo, next question, B/319, hon. Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or! \nCAP MALHEUREUX – NEW FOOTBALL PLAYGROUND",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/319",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 319,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/319) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Memorandum of \nUnderstanding signed by the Ministry and Evaco Group Mauritius for the construction of a \nnew football playground in Cap Malheureux, he will state where matters stand.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms (Mr L. Pentiah): Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, may I please, first of all, thank the Third Member of Grand’ Baie and \nPoudre d’Or for this question. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with your permission, I will reply to \nthis question on behalf of my colleague and friend, the Minister of Youth and Sports.  \n\n85 \n \nI am informed that on 17 December 2020, an MoU was signed between the then \nMinistry of Youth Empowerment, Sports and Recreation and Evaco Ltd for the construction \nof a football ground, a pétanque court, an outdoor gym, a kid’s corner and related amenities \nand infrastructure on a plot of land of some 13,000 m2 which is vested in the said Ministry at \nChemin Vingt Pieds, Cap Malheureux. \nI am further informed by Evaco Ltd that the football playground and fencing along the \nplayground has been completed. The public is authorised to use the football playground. \nTemporary solar led lights have also been installed for use of the playground in the evening.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as per the provisions of the MoU, some infrastructural works, \nsuch as the construction of the changing rooms,  \nadministrative block and stands, though completed at 60%, are still pending. Provision is \nbeing made for the final phase of the project which is currently at procurement stage \ncomprising the following – \n• \nprovision of external lighting for football pitch; \n• \njogging track; \n• \nkids’ playground; \n• \noutdoor gym; \n• \nboulodrome ; \n• \nexternal services network; \n• \nfootpath; \n• \nroadworks and parking, and  \n• \nlandscaping. \nThe expected completion date of the project, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, is in October \n2025.  \nHANDBALL – ENHANCEMENT ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/320",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 320,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/320) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to handball, he will state the actions taken \nby his Ministry since November 2024 to date to revive same.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n\n86 \n \nSTRAY DOGS – INCREASE – REMEDIAL ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/321",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 321,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/321) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nwhether, in regard to stray dogs, he will state if he has been made aware of the increasing \nnumber thereof over the past years \nand, if so, indicate the remedial actions being envisaged \nin relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nThe Deputy Speaker: We have two minutes left. We move to the next question. Hon. \nThird Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka! \nMAURITIUS CANE INDUSTRY AUTHORITY – AGRICULTURAL MACHINES & \nEQUIPMENT – USE & PROCUREMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/322",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 322,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/322) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to Head Teachers of \nSpecial Education Needs School, he will state the measures being envisaged for the \nrealignment of their salaries to that of their counterparts in other public schools.",
      "answer": "Reply: There are presently seventy-four Special Education Needs (SEN) institutions \nregistered with the Special Education Needs Authority (SENA) as follows – \n(i) \n47 Non-Government Organisations (NGOs); \n(ii) \n12 Special Educations Needs Integrated Units (SENIUs); \n(iii) \n7 Special Educations Needs Resource and Development Centres (SENRDCs), \nand \n(iv) \n8 Special Education Needs Schools run by the Société Diocésaine de \nl'Éducation Catholique (SeDEC). \nThe post of Head Teacher does not exist on the establishment of these institutions. \nPublic Primary Schools (SENIUs and SENRDCs) are managed by Head, Specialised Schools \nand Head, SEN Resource Centre, respectively. As regards the NGOs and SeDEC, Managers \nand Assistant Managers are responsible for the management of the schools. \nIt is the National Remuneration Board which determines the salaries of various \npositions, such as Teacher, Teachers Assistant/Clerk, Carer, Driver and Caretaker in the \nNGO-run institutions whereas the salaries and other conditions for SENIUs and SENRDCs \nare governed by the Pay Research Bureau. \nMy Ministry has been informed by the Ministry of Labour and Industrial Relations that \nin its final recommendations submitted on 27 January 2023, the National Remuneration \nBoard was not agreeable to the proposals for the inclusion of additional categories of workers \nsuch as Managers and Assistant Managers on ground that these are high profile job positions. \nPAVILLON FOOTBALL PLAYGROUND, QUATRE BORNES – MAINTENANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/323",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 323,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/323) Mr P. Venkatasami (The Third Member for Quartier Militaire & \nMoka) asked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nwhether, in regard to the Mauritius Cane Industry Authority, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain therefrom, information as to – \n(a) \nthe number of agricultural machines and equipment available thereat, indicating \nthe – \n(i) \nnumber currently being used for the ploughing of lands of small planters \nprior to embarking in new plantation, and \n(ii) \nthe lead time for the execution of tasks after payment effected therefor, \nand \n(b) \nwhether there has been any order for the procurement of new machines and, if \nso, indicate the – \n(i) \nnumber procured, and \n(ii) \nexpected delivery date thereof.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: I thank the hon. Member for putting this question. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, \nas regards part (a) of the question, I have been informed by the Mauritius Cane Industry \nAuthority that presently there are 35 operational agricultural machines and equipment \navailable at the Agricultural Mechanisation Unit where 25 tractors are used for land \npreparation, five bell loaders are used for building and one roller is used for compaction. One \nhydraulic excavator is due for excavation and splitting of rocks and boulders, and one \nhydraulic excavator coupled with a cane cutter is used for cane harvesting. There are 27 \n\n87 \n \nmachines that are not operational and have largely exceeded their lifetime. They cannot be \nrepaired due to the high maintenance costs. \nThey also represent safety hazards to users. These has been earmarked to be sold as \ncrafts or to be used as spare parts for existing machines. \nWith regard part (a)(i) of the question, the number of machines currently being used for \nploughing of land of small planters is 27, out of which 22 are crawler tractors and five \npneumatic tractors. Regarding part (a)(ii) of the question, the waiting time depends on the \nrequest of the planters together with payment and singing of the contracts, and also depends \non the month of the year when the planter undertakes the harvest. The land preparation is \nperformed after the planter has harvested his field. The allocation of bulldozers is made \naccording to well-defined plan, normally according to regional grouping while maintaining a \nfirst come, first served basis. \nNotwithstanding the capacity of work that the unit can take, many planters obtain the \nmachine on time. In certain cases, due to breakdown of machines, heavy workloads or \nadverse climatic conditions, works are delayed and performed at a later stage. However, there \nare cases where planters are reluctant to abide to the planning and complain when they do not \nobtain the required services immediately after having submitted their requests. \nAs regard part (b) of the question, I have been informed by the Mauritius Cane Industry \nAuthority that two contracts were awarded last year for three D6 type crawler tractors and \ntwo agricultural pneumatic tractors with accessories. One crawler tractor has been delivered \nto the MCIA last week, and the remaining equipment will be delivered in May this year after \ncompletion of all administrative procedures and commissioning. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay. Just one question because time is already over. \nMr Venkatasami: Could the Minister say, how some planters who have already paid \nsince January but till now they have not yet… \nDr. Boolell: I’m sorry? \nMr Venkatasami: Some planters already paid for land preparation since January but \ntill now, no work has been done. \nDr. Boolell: But I can assure the hon. Member that the matter will be looked into, \naddressed very forcefully so that we can give satisfaction to one and all. \n\n88 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Members, the Table have been advised that the following \nPQs have been withdrawn: B/324, B/325, B/330, B/332, B/333, B/337, B/351 and B/352. \nTime is over. \nSTATEMENTS BY MINISTERS \nEXECUTIVE ORDER – REGULATING IMPORTS – RECIPROCAL TARIFF \n(4.01 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with your permission, I am making a \nStatement on the Executive Order entitled “Regulating Imports with a Reciprocal Tariff to \nRectify Trade Practices that contribute to Large and Persistent Annual United States Goods \nTrade Deficits” signed by President Trump on 02 April of this year.  \nPresident Trump invoked his authority under the International Emergency Economic \nPowers Act of 1977 to address the national emergency posed by the absence of reciprocity in \nthe US trade relationships and other harmful policies like currency manipulation and unfair \ntrade practices. \nThe Executive Order imposes a baseline 10% tariff on all imported goods as from 05 \nApril 2025. The United States will also impose an individualised reciprocal higher tariff \nproportionate to the level of its trade deficit with that country as from 09 April 2025. \nThe Executive Order further states that these tariffs will remain in effect until such time \nas the President determines that the threat posed by the trade deficit and underlying non-\nreciprocal treatment is satisfied, resolved or mitigated. Some products that are exempted from \nthis policy are steel and aluminium, copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, critical \nminerals and energy products. Basically, all these goods are strategic for the United States, \nwhich explains their exclusion. \nIt is our understanding, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that the calculation of the reciprocal \ntariff is based on the trade deficit incurred by the United States with Mauritius in 2024. In \nthat year, Mauritius exported around USD 234.5 million of goods to the United States while \nit imported only USD 48 million of goods. This results in a trade deficit of USD 186.5 \nmillion for the United States. \nThe trade deficit as a percentage of Mauritius exports to the US is estimated at 80%. \nTherefore, as per the US calculation, the reciprocal tariff for Mauritius is 80%. However, this \n\n89 \n \npercentage was halved and a discounted reciprocal tariff of 40% will be applied for our \nexports entering the United States market. \nThe main products exported to the US include live primates, fish, sugar, textiles and \napparel. \nAs soon as President Trump assumed Office on 20 January 2025, he signed the \nAmerica First Trade Policy Presidential Memorandum which aims at undertaking a number \nof studies and proposing recommendations to address persistent trade deficits, amongst \nothers. \nIn February 2025, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) had \nrequested public comments on unfair trade practices and non- reciprocal trade arrangements \naffecting the US economy by the deadline of 11 March 2025. Accordingly, Mauritius made a \nsubmission highlighting that the top 20 US exports to Mauritius do not attract any tariff at all. \nThe mutual benefits of AGOA were also underscored. \nOn 03 April 2025, the WTO Director-General stated that many members had contacted \nthe WTO regarding the potential impact of the tariffs on their economies and global trade. \nShe expressed concern over the decline in trade and the risk of a tariff war driven by \nretaliatory measures. Highlighting the potential for significant trade diversion, she urged \nmembers to handle the resulting pressures responsibly to prevent escalating tensions. \nThe Executive Order means, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that our exports of goods to the \nUnited States will now be subject to a tariff of 40%. This will be clearly highly detrimental to \nour economy. The US is the 4th largest buyer of Mauritian goods.  Some 41 export-oriented \nenterprises, employing some 16,750 persons, depend on the US market. Being an AGOA \neligible country, Mauritius has been benefiting from duty-free market access for some 6,400 \nproduct lines on the US market. \nOther AGOA eligible countries like Lesotho, Botswana and Madagascar will also face \na tariff varying between 50%, 37% and 47%, respectively. \nThe Ministry of Foreign Affairs had a meeting, which included high-level \nrepresentatives from various Ministries, as well as public and private sector stakeholders, \nnamely the MCCI, the Sugar Syndicate, Business Mauritius and MEXA, with a view to \ncharting the way forward and mitigating the fallouts on our economy. \n\n90 \n \nI have chaired two meetings with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration \nand International Trade, and the officers of the Ministry of Finance, with the Junior Minister. \nThe following course of action was agreed – \n1) \nDiscuss possible avenues with the United States at the bilateral and regional \nlevels; \n2) \nWork with like-minded group of countries, including AGOA eligible countries as \nwell as the African Union mission in Washington D.C. with a view to devising a \nstrategy to open up discussions with the United States; and \n3) \nNegotiate a Bilateral Trade Agreement with the United States which would \nprovide the necessary predictability to our trading relations. \nA High-Level Committee has been set up by Government to monitor the situation and \nliaise with all public, private and foreign stakeholders, including the Corporate Council for \nAfrica, that can work together to mitigate the fallouts from the US Executive Order and \nensure continued trade between Mauritius and the United States.  \nGovernment will also engage with the US as the Executive Order provides that \nreciprocal tariff can be modified if the country takes – \n“significant steps to remedy non-reciprocal trade arrangements and align sufficiently \nwith the United States on economic and national security matters.” \nI am also writing to President Trump with a view to discuss the concerns of Mauritius.  \nThank you.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and \nNational Solidarity, you have a statement? \nMr Subron: Yes, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \n(4.08 p.m.)  \nNPF/NSF INVESTMENT COMMITTEE – HOLD ATTITUDE LTD –SECURED \nBOND INVESTMENT   \nThe Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity (Mr A. Subron): With your permission, I wish to make a Statement on the secured bond investment \nmade by the National Pensions Fund (NPF) and the National Savings Fund (NSF) in Hold \nAttitude Ltd, a private company registered in Mauritius. \n\n91 \n \n This bond investment was made for a total amount of Rs1.45 billion, on 01 March \n2022 and was due to be repaid by 30 September 2024.  \nI wish to inform the House that the bond investment has now been fully repaid to the \ntune of Rs1,618,214,214, the last payment being made on 27 March 2025.  \nThis amount comprises the following – \n• Capital Amount Due \nRs1,450,000,000 \n• Interest Due  \n  \nRs142,048,357 \n• Interest Penalty (of 3% above applicable interest rate) Rs26,165,857 \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the House may wish to refer to my reply made to PQ B/23 of \n10 December 2024, whereby I informed the House that the NPF/NSF Investment Committee \nhad agreed to the extension of capital repayment of the bond issued by Hold Attitude Ltd for \nan amount of Rs1.45 billion, from 30 September 2024 to 31 March 2025, but interest due was \nto be paid by the end of December 2024.  \nGiven that as at 31 December 2024, the interest due was not settled, the NPF/NSF \nInvestment Committee, on 28 January 2025, took the decision to trigger the event of default \nin accordance with Clause 9.1 of the Share Pledge Agreement and in conformity with the \nSecond Schedule of the Notes of Subscription Agreement, with the aim that by the end of \nMarch 2025, the process of triggering the default will be completed. The NPF and NSF had \nembarked in this process by requesting a noteholders meeting, which was held on 06 March \n2025, and thereafter Hold Attitude Ltd was requested to repay the capital, interest and penalty \non the interest for a total of Rs1,613,307,877 by 19 March 2025. \nIt is to be noted that Hold Attitude Ltd had pledged 40 % of shares it held in the \nAttitude Hospitality Ltd as collateral as part of the bond issue. \nOn 13 March 2025, a proposal was made by the Societé Antisthene, the major \nshareholder of Attitude Hospitality Ltd, to buy the 40% of Hold Attitude stake in Attitude \nHospitality Ltd, through a Share Purchase agreement and NPF and NSF would then be fully \npaid by the Société Antisthene, at latest by 31 March 2025  \nConsequently, upon advice from the Attorney General’s Office, on 19 March 2025, the \nNPF/NSF Investment Committee agreed to the proposal made by Société Antisthene to buy \nthe shares of Hold Attitude through a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA), following which, the \n\n92 \n \nNPF and NSF would receive all their dues that is capital, interest, plus penalty on the interest \ndue for a total amount of Rs1,618,214,214 by 31 March 2025. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is to be pointed out that the proposal made by Société \nAntisthene to buy the shares of Hold Attitude was in accordance with the Constitution of \nAttitude Hospitality Ltd which provides for the shares to be offered for sale to the existing \nshareholders of Attitude Hospitality Ltd and only if they would refuse, then the shares would \nbe sold to a third party. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to reiterate the commitment of this Government to \nensure that it is the interest of the people, first and foremost, that guides the actions of \nGovernment. \nIn this particular matter, it is the safeguard of the contributions of workers of our \nRepublic, under both the National Pensions Fund and the National Savings Fund, that has \nguided the actions taken by my Ministry. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry has acted in a fair, transparent and decisive \nmanner to bring forward a rapid resolution to the recovery of funds invested by the National \nPensions Fund and the National Savings Fund in the bond issued by the Hold Attitude Ltd.  \nThank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir.  \nPUBLIC BILLS  \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the following Bills were read a first time –  \n(a) \nThe National Agency for Drug Control Bill (No. VI of 2025). \n(b) \nThe Vallée d’Osterlog Endemic Garden Foundation (Repeal) Bill (No. VII of \n2025). \nThe Deputy Speaker: Madam Speaker will now take the chair. \nAt this stage, Madam Speaker took the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated! Yes, hon. Dr. Boolell! \nSecond Reading \nTHE VALLÉE D’OSTERLOG ENDEMIC GARDEN FOUNDATION (REPEAL) BILL \n(No. VII of 2025) \n\n93 \n \nOrder for Second Reading read. \n(4.18 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries (Dr. A. Boolell): Madam Speaker, I beg to move that the Vallée d’Osterlog Endemic Garden \nFoundation (Repeal) Bill (No. VII of 2025) be read a second time. \nThe findings of the Office of Public Sector Governance are revealing. No responsible \ngovernment can be indifferent to mismanagement. A technical committee was set up at the \nlevel of the Ministry to assess all the financial implications and logistical means. It reached \nthe conclusion that the best course of action is to transfer all activities of the Vallée \nd’Osterlog Endemic Garden Foundation to the National Parks Conservation Service. \nConsequently, the Native Terrestrial Biodiversity and National Parks Act will be amended. \nMadam Speaker, I was Minister of Agro-Industry when I moved this Bill in 2007. It is a \nbody corporate and covers an area of 275 hectares of pristine forest comprising endangered \nand indigenous plant species. An amazing garden with its flora and fauna. The management \nand administration of the garden should have been paramount. The Vallée d’Osterlog is a site \nwhere pink pigeons are displayed and it will eventually become a release site for these birds. \nBeautiful parakeets fly over, the valley of beautiful birds indeed, the pink pigeon was brought \nfrom near extinction by Carl Jones, an ornithologist of world repute. \nIt is a heaven and gateway to birders paradise. It was the Prime Minister, hon. Dr. \nNavin Ramgoolam who was right to save another valley, that is, the Vallée de Ferney. A \nblessing indeed, otherwise a motorway would have cut across it. President Macron in his \nofficial visit will plant the traditional tree at the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam Botanical \nGarden and will make the most of cultural heritage of the garden to consolidate the strong \nbond between our Small Island Developing State, Ocean State and the Republic of France. \nSome will call it garden diplomacy! \nMadam Speaker, the newly appointed High Commissioner to London, a keen botanist \nand scientific will reestablish contact with Royal Botanic Gardens, likeminded research \ncentres and the Vallée d’Osterlog endemic garden. Our best endeavour is to save endemic \nspecies, training of staff and the setting up of seed bank are vital. The valley is an attractive \nplace not sought after by natural lovers. The garden was centre for research, development and \ninnovation, of learning for school children and a randonnée for the wider public. A garden \nwith a window to majestic valley of great and exclusive beauty, wetlands, rivers, canals, \n\n94 \n \ncascades, glens with amazing flora and fauna, making the young excited about something \nfundamental, primitive and contact with nature. This is the place where you put the damn \nphone down!  \nThe foundation was financed initially by funding from the National Parks Conservation \nFund. Self-financing will have been inevitable if it had been properly managed. Much hope \nwas pinned on the board comprising ten members. All the hope and expectations were dashed \nas from 2015. Matters deteriorated at an incredible pace since 2016. The director wielded \npower with a ruthlessness, unfit of a manager! It is a curse, and management has been \nabysmal! Absolutely shocking! He is on a permanent and pensionable establishment of the \nfoundation. Does he legitimately deserve any entitlement? Guilty of negligence and crimes \nagainst nature, unbelievable and unbeatable unscrupulousness! Sometimes what is legal is not \nalways legitimate. \nThe then government acted irresponsibly and allowed descent into chaos. Management \nwas topsy-turvy. Over the recent years, the foundation formulated three strategic plans: 2020-\n2022, 2021-2026, 2022-2027. Merely an eye wash! No action plan was prepared for \nimplementation. The director ruled with an iron fist, full of himself and waged a \npsychological warfare to undermine management, instil fear and moral of staff silent. Vacant, \nunfunded post of key positions, such as Technical Manager, Scientific Manager, \nAdministrative Manager and a Human Resource Manager; these posts were never filled.  \nThe 33 workers of the foundation are protected under the Workers’ Rights Act 2019. 28 \nout of the 33 are employed on a permanent and pensionable establishment of the foundation, \nincluding the director. Five persons are employed on temporary basis. They will all, except \nthe director, be transferred to the National Parks and Conservation Service on a permanent \nand pensionable establishment. Section 4 (7) of the Savings and transitional provisions clause \nof the Bill makes provision for the termination of his appointment upon commencement of \nthe Foundation Bill (Repeal) Act. He will be paid his pension benefits if any in accordance \nwith such pension schemes as may be applicable to him. The guy must go! \nAs to procurement exercise, the Office of the Public Sector Governance had this to say \n– \n“During the last procurement exercise held in April 2023, the APSO had issued tender \ndocuments to a supplier who was debarred by the Public Procurement Office from \n\n95 \n \nparticipating in public procurement from August 2021 to August 2024 for misconduct \nrelating to submission of a bid.” \nA case of no return, but aided and abetted by the indifference of an irresponsible \nregime. The inertia of the regime of Pravind Jugnauth was a trademark, except when he had \nto put the hands in the tills and pockets of taxpayers. The decadent regime waited on the \nstroke of midnight to enlist the services of the Office of Public Sector Governance to conduct \na thorough enquiry into the management of the Vallée d’Osterlog Endemic Garden \nFoundation. The findings of the report were submitted on 16 October 2023, and the word \n‘poor’ featured prominently in the report. \nA cursory look of the report would send cold shivers down the spine over wastage, \nmismanagement and fraudulent practices. The repeal of the Act is a strong signal. A detailed \nstudy of the Office of Public Sector Governance gives us every reason to introduce a \nprogramme-based budgeting. The hon. Prime Minister is right, no substitute for transparency, \naccountability and governance. There are lessons to be learned and drawn from the repeal of \nthis Act.  \nMadam Speaker, if a regime is indifferent or insensitive and does not wage war \naggressively on corruption. A responsible government is under the constant gaze of the \nwatchful eyes of taxpayers. The audit report will no longer be a letter through the letter box to \nbe perused at leisure. Game over! This Bill is a foretaste of the politics of programme-based \nbudgeting. The foundation has to be a jewel in the crown of endemic garden. It will be \nentrusted to the Conservation and Park Management Department of the Ministry. \nThe Director of the Conservator has an obligation to restore this prized garden to its \npristine environment. There is no retreat nor surrender on firm commitment. Section 10A on \nManagement and administration of Garden is the main thrust of the Bill. The Director of the \nNational Parks and Conservation Service has taken firm commitment. We all have to live up \nto expectations of a nation which believes in tight scrutiny of sustainable environment. I have \nimpressed upon the Directors of the National Parks and Conservation Service, and Forestry \nnot to look back but to draw lessons to level up and this is an opportunity which is knocking \nto revamp the centre, making it into a centre of repute. An endemic garden with a seed bank \nis as good as gold and a joy for all from scientific world to the mere mortals seeking solace \nfrom mother nature. It can be a potential for biodiversity carbon credit. \nWith these words, Madam Speaker, I commend the Bill to the House. \n\n96 \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nMr Bhagwan rose and seconded. \nMadam Speaker: Mr Bhagwan! \n(4.27 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change (Mr \nR. Bhagwan): Merci, Madame la présidente.  \nMadame la présidente, aujourd’hui, cet après-midi, nous débattons un texte de loi qu’on \npeut qualifier de fort symbolique, par rapport à notre responsabilité intergénérationnelle. \nMadame la présidente, un acte fort, concret et symbolique.  \nMadame la présidente, que lèguerons-nous à nos arrières petits-enfants ? Un grouillant \ncentre financier et touristique ? D’importantes réserves dans une grande banque \ninternationale ? Non, Madame la présidente, notre responsabilité envers… \nMadam Speaker: Do not touch the mike!  \nMr Bhagwan: …les futures… \nMadam Speaker: Do not touch the mike! Yes. \nMr Bhagwan: …générations va bien au-delà de cela. Nous devons laisser à nos enfants \nune planète qui leur permettrait, tout au moins, de bénéficier des mêmes conditions de vie \nque nous avons connues. Le contraire serait injuste, égoïste, et à court-termiste.  \nMadame la présidente, nous voulons à travers ces amendements, préparer le terrain \npour quelque chose de plus grand, de plus fondamental : la reconnaissance du droit de la \nnature dans notre Constitution. C’est un changement de cap. Il ne s’agit plus de nettoyer ce \nqu’on salit, ce qui est élémentaire. Il ne s’agit pas seulement de protéger l’environnement, \nmais d’apprendre à respecter toutes les formes de vies se trouvant sur notre planète, les droits \nde la nature. \nMadame la présidente, une vision forte et courageuse d’un gouvernement qui agit, un \ngouvernement du changement. Située non loin d’Eau Bleue, la Vallée d’Osterlog est l’un des \nderniers sanctuaires de biodiversité encore préservé de notre île. La Vallée d’Osterlog abrite \nune flore et une faune endémique rare, avec au moins 67 espèces de plantes déjà identifiées. \nParmi la grande diversité de plantes, certaines portent des noms créoles malgré imagés, tel \nque ‘Bois Cassant’, ‘Takamaka’, ‘Bois Corail’, ‘Bois Bouquet Banané’, ‘Langue de Vache’, \n\n97 \n \n‘Bois de Natte’ ou encore de ‘Bois Margoze’. La Vallée d’Osterlog est l’un des derniers \nrefuges de la flore native de l’île. \n On ne le répètera jamais assez, seulement 2 % du territoire est couvert de foret native, \nprincipalement dans le sud-ouest, le sud-est et sur certaines îles satellites. Avec 39 % de \nplantes, 80 % des oiseaux non-marins, 80 % des reptiles et 40 % des chauves-souris \nconsidérées comme endémiques, Maurice, petit point perdu dans l’océan, a un niveau élevé \nd’endémisme, au point où le pays a été désigné par l’Union internationale pour la \nconservation de la nature, comme un centre de diversité végétale, et il fait même partie du \nhotspot de biodiversité de Madagascar, et des îles de l’Océan Indien. \nMadame la présidente, une biodiversité unique, mais bien fragile, tellement fragile. \nActuellement 89 %, oui 89 % de la flore endémique mauricienne est considérée comme \nmenacée, et 61 espèces indigènes sont déjà classées comme éteintes ; le Perroquet à large bec \net deux espèces de tortues géantes, sont comme on le dit dans le jargon ‘as dead as a Dodo’. \nNonobstant bien sûr, le fait que la science travaille à faire renaître le dodo. Concernant les \nespèces végétales endémiques, 141 sont en danger critique. De nombreux efforts sont en \ncours, mais les défis restent énormes. La stratégie nationale pour la biodiversité a défini cinq \nobjectifs stratégiques, dont l’établissement d’un réseau représentatif et viable des zones \nprotégées.  \nParmi les huit zones classées Protected Endemic Sanctuaries (PES), il y a justement la \nVallée d’Osterlog. Tout comme l’île aux Aigrettes et les Gorges de Rivière Noire, ces \nsanctuaires endémiques sont des poches de vie, ils abritent ce qu’il nous reste de la \nbiodiversité originelle. Ils sont les derniers bastions de forêt native, les refuges des plantes et \nanimaux endémiques, les poumons verts de notre avenir. \nMadame la présidente, tout comme la protection, la conservation et la gestion des zones \nenvironnementales sensibles sont d’importance capitale pour le fonctionnement naturel de ces \nlieux, et la viabilité du développement socio-économique du pays. Un comité que moi-même \nje préside avec le Junior Minister Joanna Bérenger, l’Environmentally Sensitive Areas \nCommittee, qui se veut être une plateforme de coordination facilitant la collaboration entre \nministères, organismes et ONG concernés, contribuera à la protection et la préservation des \nzones écologiquement sensibles, par le biais de politiques gouvernementales, de programmes \nciblés, et des initiatives stratégiques et de normes spécifiques. \n\n98 \n \nLe but, Madame la présidente, est de préserver leur intégrité et de maintenir leurs \nfonctions écologiques. Les disparités relevées dans les études précédentes portant sur trois \nzones écologiquement sensibles, à savoir les marais côtiers, les zones humides d’altitude, et \nles mangroves font actuellement l’objet d’un travail de révision confié à un cabinet de \nconsultants pour une durée de six mois. De plus, reconnaissant l’importance des zones \nécologiquement sensibles en tant que rempart naturel protégeant à la fois la population et la \nbiodiversité, le gouvernement s’engage à introduire une loi sur les zones écologiquement \nsensibles en cohérence avec son programme. Cette loi servira de socle à un développement \nvéritablement durable. À ce sujet, des consultations pour la révision de l’ébauche de l’ESA \nBill a déjà démarré.  \nMadame la présidente, en abrogeant la loi qui encadrait jusque-là la fondation de la \nVallée d’Osterlog, et en transférant la gestion de la vallée au National Parks and \nConservation Service, nous faisons un choix du bon sens. Le gouvernement n’a pas perdu de \ntemps pour réagir et agir. Il a pris acte comme l’a bien dit mon collègue, du rapport de The \nOffice of the Public Sector Governance qui a pointé du doigt un grave disfonctionnement \ndans la gouvernance de la Vallée d’Osterlog. Déficit de leadership et mauvaise gestion, \ncomme c’était la pratique sous l’ancien gouvernement MSM. Un constat qui ne pouvait être \nignoré. \n Le NPCS est l’entité publique dédiée à la gestion de nos parcs nationaux. Son mandat \npar rapport à la biodiversité terrestre est clair : protéger, restaurer, et sensibiliser. Il est donc \ntout à fait logique que l’administration de la Vallée d’Osterlog passe sous la loupe du \nNational Parks and Conservation Service. \nCependant, Madame la présidente, ne nous voilons pas la face. La protection de la \nbiodiversité n’est pas l’affaire du NPCS et celle du ministère de l’Environnement. Elle est à \nla fois la responsabilité environnementale et un enjeu économique et social majeur pour le \npays, signifiant que tous, autorités nationales comme régionale, et citoyens surtout doivent se \nsentir concernés.  \nCinq facteurs majeurs influent sur la diversité biologique – \n1. \nLa conservation de milieux naturels en milieux artificiels est la cause principale \nde la destruction et du morcellement des écosystèmes. \n\n99 \n \n2. \nLes pollutions de l’air, du sol, de l’eau, mais aussi lumineuse et sonore, affectent \ntous les aspects de l’environnement. Par exemple, le plastique pollue les milieux \net touche tous les organismes qui les peuplent. \n3. \nLa surexploitation des ressources compromet gravement le fonctionnement des \nécosystèmes et leur renouvellement. \n4. \nLe changement climatique influe sur les cycles de vie de l’ensemble des êtres \nvivants. Il impacte également la répartition géographique des espèces et donc, la \nchaîne alimentaire. \nLes écosystèmes sont des excellents thermomètres des effets du changement \nclimatique et leur gestion doit prendre en compte les évolutions constatées. \n5. \nL’introduction volontaire ou involontaire par l’homme d’espèces exotiques \nenvahissantes (EEE) impacte tous les milieux et les territoires.  \n \nNos forêts, nos rivières, nos oiseaux, nos plantes endémiques auront droit à \nl’existence, à la régénération et à la protection. Et la Vallée d’Osterlog, avec ses 275 hectares \nde biodiversité, jouera un rôle essentiel dans cette transition. \n \nLe nouveau cadre permettra – \n• La valorisation de la recherche scientifique, tant disparue ; \n• La formation des jeunes à l’écologie mauricienne ; \n• L’accueil du public dans le respect du vivant ; \n• La restauration des espèces menacées. \nCe sanctuaire – que j’invite beaucoup de mes collègues à aller visiter – deviendra un lieu de \nreconnexion, d’identité, où chacun pourra sentir qu’il fait partie de cette île, de cette nature, et \nde ce tout fragile mais magnifique. J’inviterai mon collègue à organiser une visite pour les \nmembres du Parlement, avec vous, à la tête. \nMadam Speaker: Exactly! Très bonne idée ! \nMr Bhagwan: M. la présidente, protéger la nature, c’est penser l’avenir autrement. \nC’est défendre une autre idée de progrès, fondée sur la justice écologique, la solidarité \nintergénérationnelle, la responsabilité collective.  \nVivre en harmonie avec la nature pour une meilleure santé et une meilleure qualité de \nvie. À travers les parcours de santé comme le Dauguet, que j’avais moi-même initié une \nvingtaine d’années de cela, avec le ministère de l’Environnement, nous sommes en train de le \nréhabiliter en ce moment. Et c’est sûr, mes deux amis de la circonscription numéro 2 seront \n\n100 \n \npartie prenante de cette réhabilitation. Nous voulons maintenir ce lien avec la nature et faire \nde la biophilie une passion de nos concitoyens. \nAlors, aujourd’hui, Madame la présidente, je demande à mes collègues de voter ce texte \nde loi avec conviction parce qu’il porte en lui plus qu’une réforme. Il porte une vision, une \ncohérence et une espérance ; celle d’un pays qui prend soin de son vivant ; celle d’un \ngouvernement qui agit et celle d’une nation qui choisit la voie de la responsabilité, du respect \net de l’avenir de la nature. \nJe vous remercie. \nMadam Speaker: Merci ! \nYes, hon. Dr. Ms Thannoo! \n(4.40 p.m.) \nDr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka): Thank you, \nMadam Speaker. \nWe, ecologists, welcome this Bill. We are very happy, which is a very rare \nphenomenon. While we await inclusion of the rights of nature in our Constitution and the \nEnvironmentally Sensitive Area Bill, we applaud the Government’s commitment to protect \nthe Vallée of Osterlog, a prime sanctuary, indeed, for our endangered endemic species. \nMadam Speaker, every conservation act is about protecting life, protecting nature, \nprotecting our ecosystems that are currently under dire threat. We live now in the era of the \nAnthropocene. As we mention again and again, what is the Anthropocene? It is the era where \nman has crossed all planetary boundaries, heralding an era of uncertainty as to humanity’s \nfuture. We have crossed all limits whereby the stratosphere could self-regulate. Man’s \nindustrial activities are now irreversibly altering the planet. The future is dark for future \ngenerations. We are currently experiencing the sixth mass extinction and human life itself is \nat stake. Thus, when this Government embraces its duty, its prime responsibility to protect \nnature during this era, we can but thank our decision-makers to be guardians of life by \nprotecting nature.  \nWith this Bill, the Government is laying the firm foundation for an eco-centric future. It \nis honouring its pledge to protect our fragile ecosystems as laid out in our Government \nProgramme. It is the eco-centric future we want. It is the eco-centric future we need. It is the \neco-centric future we will continue to fight for, with every fibre of our being. A responsible \n\n101 \n \nState, an ecologically conscious State, ready to invest in our ESAs, our Environmentally \nSensitive Areas, will pave the way for a whole nation to become custodians of nature.  \nLet us be mindful of what being a custodian means. Among indigenous people across \nthe world, the people who are foremost in the battle against the mass annihilation of our \necosystems, to be a custodian means to be a duty-bound benevolent guardian. It does not \ninvolve the concept of ownership which is a capitalist perversion of our relationship with \nnature. To be a guardian, to be a custodian means to recognise our prime and sacred duty \ntowards protecting nature. We do not own it. We take care of it with benevolence, with \nhumble knowledge that our survival depends on nature.  \nThe Vallée of Osterlog can indeed exemplify how Mauritians can be custodians, that is, \nbenevolent guardians of nature. Thus, the public management of our ESAs may follow the \nmodel of custodianship as practiced by indigenous people across the world.  \nMay I remind the House of the rich eco-conscious cultures of the aborigine and Torres \nStrait Islander peoples from Australia; indigenous people to whom we are connected through \na sacred rapport with nature. Our Indian Ocean history of cultural connections that precede \nEuropean colonisation link us with indigeneity across the oceanic rim. We carry within us our \nlegacies of our ancestors, indigenous people, who were taken from their lands and whose \nconnections with nature have always been sacred. To be a custodian means to protect the \nsanctity of nature and not to own it or use it for profiteering.  \nThus, the Vallée of Osterlog can be the model of how our citizens may be involved in \nthe act of conservation through the sharpening of a collective sense of sacred responsibility \ntowards our natural environment. We are hereby engaging with alternative epistemologies – a \ncomplex term – to actually identify how we view the world from different perspectives other \nthan European colonisation and natural intelligence whereby we recognise alternative modes \nof being embedded in nature and essential to indigeneity. We are hereby decolonising our \nminds. It is the only way for saving the planet. The indigenous epistemology and mode of \nbeing with nature that will allow to navigate the climate crisis and protect our ESAs, our \nhomeland and our planet as a whole. \n Madam Speaker, may I read from an indigenous poet, Tanaya Winder Sperm, on the \nindigenous sacred in nature – \n“Stand with us as accomplices. Follow our lead for we have always been well versed in \nsurvival. We were shaped by fire, made from lightning and dirt-covered hands that \n\n102 \n \nknow when to ignite healing. Now is the time. Let us not drown in Mother Earth’s tears. \nMother Earth has a spirit and she’s asking us to listen.” \nIndigenous people have always been custodians of planet Earth. This Government is \nhereby following suit by shouldering responsibility towards protecting the Vallée of Osterlog, \nour prime ESA. To manage the Vallée of Osterlog with the people’s participation will ensure \nthat it is managed with sensitivity and understanding. It will be the model of how other ESAs \nacross the island may be managed in an inclusive, participatory and democratic manner.  \nAdditionally, through the provision made for scientific research, this Bill ascertains that \nconservationists may not only be based on local awareness, participation and knowledge, but \non the scientific contributions of experts as it was accomplished under the International \nUnion for Conservation of Nature.  \nToo often, Madam Speaker, we have witnessed the distress of conservationists in \nMauritius whose appeals have landed on deaf ears. May I refer to research accomplished by \nProfessor Vincent Florence and his team on the ecological crisis we face in Mauritius. He has \nconstantly drawn attention to how our indigenous forest are dying with proven scientific data. \nThis Bill bespeaks change by precisely foregrounding the need for scientific expertise, such \nas projects led by Professor Florence. Such scientific endeavours, we reaffirm can operate in \ncollaborative, inclusive and democratic spheres with local people under the aegis of \ngovernment led initiatives.  \nWith this Bill, Madam Speaker, we can initiate alternative economic models that revere \nnature, protect it and protect life. The Vallée of Osterlog is a prime ecological jewel. It \nincorporates unparallelled natural beauty, thrives with biodiversity and has to be safeguarded \nwith responsible and carefully managed eco-tourism. The Bill refers to recreational activity \nthat may be organised within its midst. This Government bears the utmost responsibility with \ninstigating a form of carefully managed tourism so that our endemic species and biodiversity \ncontinue to flourish. This Bill emphasises the State’s duty towards protecting biodiversity \nwhile identifying responsible economic models that will in effect shield our biodiversity from \nongoing threat. \nTo quote Vandana Shiva – \n“Biodiversity is the interconnectedness through which all life flows: food and nutrition, \nwater, oxygen and breath, endosomatic energy, the energy of living systems. \n\n103 \n \nWe are a strand in the web of life. Humans have been separated from nature through \nwhat I describe as eco-apartheid.” \nIndeed, we have been disconnected from nature. In a world of hyper consumerism, the \nworld of malls, shopping and constant buying that has entailed generations entrapped in the \nendless pursuit of short-term false gratification. This sense of false gratification has been \nscientifically linked with higher rates of depression among contemporary generations.  \nThe Vallée of Osterlog, a jewel to be protected by the State, by the people, for the \npeople, with the people, will be an example of how we can disconnect from the mindless \nrealm of consumption to a sphere focused on human wellbeing, to reconnect with nature, to \nprotect it and build alternative economic models centred on wellbeing of both humans and \nnature. Through the Vallée of Osterlog, this Government is breaking with the capitalist model \nthat only identifies as consumers. A model that dehumanises us!  \nThis Government recognises our inherent human need, that is, to reconnect with nature \nand retrieve our humanity. It centres on our rights to access our natural sites across Mauritius \nfor our collective wellbeing. Our wellbeing, Madam Speaker, is dependent on biodiversity as \nthe COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated. This pandemic erupted from the disruption of natural \necosystems when a disease, common among bats, was transferred to human beings. \nProtecting our biodiversity is about protecting life, protecting humanity and ensuring the \nplanet has a future. \nDavid Attenborough affirms that – \n“For life to truly thrive on this planet, there must be immense biodiversity. Only when \nbillions of different individual organisms make the most of every resource and \nopportunity they encounter, and millions of species lead lives that interlock so that they \nsustain each other, can the planet run efficiently. The greater the biodiversity, the more \nsecure will be all life on Earth, including ourselves be. Yet, the way we humans are now \nliving on Earth is sending biodiversity into a decline.” \nTo protect the Vallée of Osterlog is to protect biodiversity. It is to protect life. With this Bill, \nwe are demonstrating to our children how an eco-conscious Government can work towards \nsaving the future. This Government is precisely living up to its pledge: to uphold life. \nWith these words, I commend the Bill to the House. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister, you have to do your summing up! \n\n104 \n \n(4.55 p.m.) \nDr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, since brevity is the soul of the wit, I shall be brief.  We \nhave had the pleasure to listen to two excellent speeches and these speeches come from the \ninner process of the heart. \n As hon. Dr. Ms Thannoo has stated, “let us not drown in the tears of Mother Earth.” \nThis Bill is an SOS – Saving Our Souls, and this is precisely what this responsible \nGovernment is doing. There has been no retreat, no surrender and we have acted without fear \nor prejudice to save the Vallée d’Osterlog, Madam Speaker. \nI do not have to remind Members of the House as to the findings of the Office of Public \nSector of Governance. We have wasted no time to take corrective measures. I have impressed \nupon the Director of the National Parks and Conservation Service. Now that the foundation \nhas been entrusted to him – this is a garden, this is a jewel of our crown – he has to live up to \nthe expectations and he has to deliver. So, responsibilities are there and they have to live up \nto the expectations because these are the expectations, not only of the House, but of the \nnation.  \nSo, Madam Speaker, our vision is that the service, together with its numerous partners \nwill be able to enhance the Vallée d’Osterlog Endemic Garden and bring it to standards to be \nrecognised by the local community and the international community. With these words, \nMadam Speaker, I thank you very much. \nMadam Speaker: I take it you again commend the Bill to the House? \nDr. Boolell: My apologies, I commend the Bill to the House. \nMadam Speaker: It is alright, we are all humans. \nDr. Boolell: I commend the Bill to the House. \nMadam Speaker: Your friend will second the motion that it be commended to the \nHouse. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nBill read a second time and committed. \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(Madam Speaker in the Chair) \n\n105 \n \nThe Vallée d’Osterlog Endemic Garden Foundation (Repeal) Bill (No. VII of 2025) was \nconsidered and agreed to. \nOn the Assembly resuming with Madam Speaker in the Chair, Madam Speaker reported \naccordingly. \nDr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, before I come to the third reading, let me first of all \nconvey my apologies to you for trying to rush the Bill through. \nMadam Speaker: Do not worry. We are all humans as I said. \nDr. Boolell: Thank you very much, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: We want to be better humans if I understand well. \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Vallée d’Osterlog Endemic Garden Foundation \n(Repeal) Bill (No. VII of 2025) was read a third time and passed. \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Tuesday 15 April 2025 at 11.30 a.m. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned. I have someone who has an \nadjournment matter. Yes, go ahead. \nMATTERS RAISED \n(5.01 p.m.) \nPOTATO GROWERS – REPLANTATION OF POTATO – SUBSIDIES \nMr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle): Madam \nSpeaker, allow me with your permission to raise a matter of urgent public importance \naddressed to the hon. Minister of Agro Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nwith regard to the delay in disbursing subsidies for the replantation of potato to the potato \ngrowers. Can the hon. Minister do the needful to expedite matters to address these concerns? \nThe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries (Dr. A. Boolell): I am not going to say: ‘apply today, yesterday reply’, but I thank my hon. friend for \n\n106 \n \nraising the matter. I have taken the matter with the Junior Minister and the Financial \nSecretary. Matters are going to be expedited to give satisfaction to planters. Thank you very \nmuch.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister. Yes! \n(5.02 p.m.) \nFLACQ MARKET – RENOVATION WORKS \n Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil): Madam Speaker, \nmy request is addressed to the hon. Minister of Local Government. Will the Minister kindly \nstate the measures taken by his Ministry concerning the renovation works at the Bazar de \nFlacq and mention when is the work starting, please? \nThe Minister of Local Government (Mr R. Woochit): We will reply to it. I will reply \nto it. \nMadam Speaker: Je n’ai rien compris, you will try to do the needful? Is that what you \nsaid? \nMr Woochit: Yes! \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Thank you, everybody! \nAt 5.03 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 15 April 2025 at \n11.30 a.m. \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nFORMER SPEAKER & DEPUTY SPEAKER – OFFICIAL OVERSEAS MISSIONS – \nCOST INCURRED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/324",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 324,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/324) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Pavillon Football \nplayground in Quatre Bornes, he will state if consideration will be given to – \n(a) \nimprove the lighting thereof; \n(b) \nreplace the defective fencing, and  \n\n115 \n \n(c) \nfix the rocky surface thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMORC. MONT PLAISIR, FOND DU SAC – FLASH FLOOD – COMPENSATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/325",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 325,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/325) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the damages caused by the flash \nflood to the residences of Morcellement Mont Plaisir, in Fond du Sac prior to November \n2024, he will state if consideration will be given for compensation to be paid to the victims \nthereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMUGA, TYACK – FUNDS INVESTED & COLLECTED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/326",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 326,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/326) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the MUGA sports \nfacility in Tyack, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the amount of \nfunds – \n(a) \ninvested for the acquisition of gym equipment and the setting up of the synthetic \nfootball pitch thereat, and  \n(b) \ncollected from the hourly fee claimed from the users thereof, indicating how the \nfees collected by the Mauritius Sports Council are spent.",
      "answer": "Reply: As regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that the Mauritius Telecom \nFoundation has invested around Rs2.4 million for the provision of gym equipment and \nsynthetic grass for the football pitch.  \nAs regard to part (b) of the question, I am further informed by the Mauritius Sports \nCouncil that the official handing over exercise of the MUGA Tyack from the Mauritius \nTelecom Foundation has not yet taken place to date, and thus, the question of fees collected \nby the Council does not arise. \n \nRIVIÈRE DES ANGUILLES TRAFFIC CENTRE – PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/327",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 327,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/327) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Land Transport whether in regard to the proposed \nconstruction of the Rivière des Anguilles Traffic Centre, he will state – \n(a) \nthe scope of works and estimated cost thereof;  \n(b) \nthe expected date of coming into operation thereof; and  \n\n116 \n \n(c) \nthe bus routes that the Traffic Centre will serve, and  \n(d) \nif a feasibility assessment was made prior to embarking on the project.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nEEZ – BILATERAL FISHERIES AGREEMENTS – FISH STOCKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/328",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 328,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/328) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of Mauritius, he will state – \n(a) \nthe number of bilateral fisheries partnership agreements currently in force, \nindicating the – \n(i) \ncountries concerned therewith, and  \n(ii) \nconditions attached thereto, and  \n(b) \nwhere matters stand as to fish stocks taking thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIUS POST OFFICE – RECRUITMENT (2015-2025)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/329",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 329,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/329) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in regard to \nthe Mauritius Post Office, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom information \nas to the number of officers recruited thereat over the past ten years.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBEL AIR OLD MARKET FAIR – TRADERS – STALLS ALLOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/330",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 330,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/330) Mr R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & Grand \nRiver South East) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the traders \npresently operating at the privately-run Bel Air old market fair, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the District Council of Flacq, information as to where matters stand as to \nsecond expression of interest launched on 01 October 2024 for the allocation of stalls to the \ntraders at the newly constructed market fair, indicating the measures being taken to expedite \nthis transition.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n\n117 \n \n \nNTC – SPARE PARTS – PROCUREMENT EXERCISE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/331",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 331,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/331) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the Minister \nof Land Transport whether, in regard to the National Transport Corporation, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to the bidding exercises launched by \nthe Corporation for the procurement and award of contracts for spare parts since January \n2023 to date, indicating – \n(a) \nthe names of the suppliers thereof, further indicating in each case the – \n(i)  \ncontractual value thereof, and  \n(ii)  amount paid to the suppliers, and  \n(b)  if he has been aware of any irregularities and/or malpractices regarding the \nprocurement thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nNTC – RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN – FINANCIAL STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/332",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 332,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil) –",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/332) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the retirement benefit plan of the \nemployees of the National Transport Corporation, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Corporation, information as to the current financial situation of the fund set up \ntherefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBEL AIR – ROAD TRAFFIC CONGESTION – SURVEY & REMEDIAL ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/333",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 333,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/333) Mr R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & Grand \nRiver South East) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the \nroad traffic congestion issues being faced by road users in the village of Bel Air, he will state \nif a survey has been conducted thereon and, if so, indicate the – \n(a)  findings thereof, and  \n(b)  remedial actions being proposed therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n\n118 \n \n \nHARRY LATOUR STADIUM, MAHEBOURG – RENOVATION WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/334",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 334,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/334) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the renovation works being \ncarried out at the Harry Latour Stadium at Mahebourg, he will state where matters stand, \nindicating the terms and conditions of the contract awarded therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUES – CONTAINER PARK – DELIVERY PROBLEMS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/335",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 335,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/335) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to the \ncontainer park in Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the \nmeasures being envisaged to address the problem of delivery of container due to lack of \nspace thereat, indicating if he will use his good offices to request the Mauritius Ports \nAuthority to put the site situated at the ex-slaughterhouse in the port area falling under its \npurview for the storage of containers.",
      "answer": "Reply: The container yard at Port Mathurin is currently operated by the Associated \nContainer Services Ltd which holds a lease with the Mauritius Ports Authority (MPA) for \noperating a container depot for the period ending 02 April 2030. The container yard is of \n7000 m2 and has a maximum storage capacity of 300 x 20 ft containers.  \n The average number of containers per voyage that are transported to Rodrigues is 214. \nHowever, with the increasing volume of container shipment to Rodrigues, storage constraint \nis being encountered at Port Mathurin. To this effect, an expansion of the storage capacity \nwith an additional space of 7000 m2 is required to cope with the actual volume of cargo \narriving at Port Mathurin.  \n On 26 April 2024, the Mauritius Shipping Corporation Ltd (MSCL) made a request to \nthe MPA for allocation of two plots of land adjoining the container yard for container stuffing \nand unstuffing, container storage and an office for MSCL.  \n Accordingly, in August 2024, the MPA agreed to allocate the two plots of land \ncovering a total area of 5500 m2, comprising the ex-slaughter house and the cattle pen sites, \nfor the setting up of a container depot including its operational office.  \n The MSCL has already launched a restrictive bidding exercise for the appointment of \na consultant for the preparation of the project proposal for the container depot project in \n\n119 \n \nrespect of the two sites identified at Port Mathurin. Same will be submitted to the MPA, for \nconsideration, as soon as the exercise is completed. \nMSC – CONSTITUENCY NO. 4 – SPORTS FACILITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/336",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 336,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/336) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to recreational sports, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Sports Council, information as to \nthe number of sports facilities of the Council available in Constituency No. 4 Port Louis \nNorth and Montagne Longue, indicating – \n(a) \ntheir locations, and \n(b) \nthe activities held thereat since November 2024 to date and the mode of \ncommunication therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRESIDENCE PERE LAVAL MUNICIPAL COMPLEX – OPERATION – OPENING \nHOURS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/337",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 337,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/337) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Résidence Père Laval \nMunicipal Complex, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Municipal Council \nof Quatre Bornes, information as to whether the complex is currently operational and, if so, \nindicate the – \n(a) \ndifferent leisure activities being provided thereat, and \n(b) \nopening and closing hours thereof and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUES – DANGEROUS CHEMICALS – USE, HANDLING MECHANISMS & \nSENSITISATION CAMPAIGNS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/338",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 338,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/338) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nHealth and Wellness whether, in regard to pesticides, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Dangerous Chemicals Control Board, information as to the – \n(a) \nmechanisms put in place to monitor the use and handling thereof, indicating the \nstatistics provided by licensed companies thereon; \n\n120 \n \n(b) \nsensitisation campaigns held and/or proposed to be held on the use thereof in \nRodrigues, and \n(c) \nnames of the representatives from Rodrigues on the Board.",
      "answer": "Reply: The Dangerous Chemicals Control Board, operates under the purview of my \nMinistry and is responsible for the issue of licences for the import, export, manufacture, sale, \nstorage, distribution or trade in dangerous chemical, in line with the Dangerous Chemicals \nControl Act 2004. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, the use and handling of pesticides fall under the \naegis of the Ministry of Agro-industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries. In fact, a \nPesticides Regulatory Office has been set up thereat under the Use of Pesticides Act 2018. \nAs for part (b) of the question, the Pesticides Regulatory Office conducted visits in \nRodrigues in 2018 and 2024 to engage with stakeholders, assess pesticide usage, and ensure \ncompliance with the Use of Pesticides Act. Sensitisation campaigns and training sessions \nwere also conducted on safe handling and mixing of pesticides, correct dosage to be used, \nadherence to labelling instructions, use of protective equipment, amongst others, during those \nvisits. \nWith regard to part (c) of the question, there are no representatives from Rodrigues on \nthe Dangerous Chemicals Control Board. \n Nevertheless, officers from the Principal Public Health & Food Safety Inspectorate \nCadre posted at the Public Health Office in Rodrigues are entrusted the responsibility to \nensure compliance with the relevant provisions of the Dangerous Chemicals Control Act \n2004. \nTAXI OPERATORS WELFARE FUND – FUNDS COLLECTED – MEDICAL \nSCHEME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/339",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 339,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/339) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Taxi Operators Welfare Fund, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe amount of funds collected and expenses incurred therefrom since its \nimplementation to date; \n(b) \nif consideration will be given to amending the relevant legislation to render \ncontribution thereto optional, and \n\n121 \n \n(c) \nif a proper medical scheme has been designed for taxi operators registered \nthereunder.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPUBLIC SERVICE VEHICLE (TAXI) LICENCE – HOTEL-BASED – ALLOCATION \nPROCEDURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/340",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 340,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/340) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Public Service Vehicle (Taxi) Licence \nwith hotels as base of operation issued over the past ten years, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information as to the number \nthereof, indicating – \n(a) \nthe procedures followed for the allocation thereof, and \n(b) \nif all applicants complied with the required criteria in terms of – \n(i) \ncharacter certificate test; \n(ii) \nage of applicant, and \n(iii) number of taxis per hotels.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPBAT – HEADMASTER & DEPUTY HEADMASTER – APPOINTMENT CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/341",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 341,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/341) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix)  \n asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to cases referred to \nthe Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal regarding the appointment of officers to the grades of \nHeadmaster and Deputy Headmaster since 2019 to 2021 and after the final determination of \nthe Tribunal confirming their substantive appointment, he will state if a High Powered \nCommittee was set up to that effect and, if so, indicate the recommendations made by the \nCommittee regarding payment of gratuity and pension benefits for all those officers who \nretired before the final determination of the Tribunal.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nAMBASSADORS – OFFICIAL OVERSEAS MISSIONS – 2015-2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/342",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 342,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade",
      "question": "(No. B/342) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade whether, \n\n122 \n \nin regard to the official overseas missions undertaken by Ambassadors appointed since 2015 \nto 2024, he will give a list thereof, indicating in each case the – \n(a) \ntrips effected from – \n(i) \nMauritius to other countries; \n(ii) \ntheir countries of posting to Mauritius or to other countries, and \n(b) \namount of funds disbursed by Government in terms of airfares, per diem, \nentertainment allowance and chauffeur facilities, and \n(c) \nobjectives and outcomes thereof.",
      "answer": "(Vide reply to PQ B/289) \n \nPOUDRE D’OR – BARACHOIS ALLOCATION – ACTIVITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/343",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 343,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/343) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the Barachois found at Poudre d’Or Village, he will state the number thereof which \nare operational, indicating in each case the – \n(a)  name and address of the leaseholders, and  \n(b)  duration of the lease, specifying the commencement and ending dates thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: In November 2023, a Barachois Policy was established to outline the criteria for \nthe allocation of barachois which were vested in the Ministry of Agro-Industry, Food \nSecurity, Blue Economy and Fisheries. The Policy makes provision for the procedures for the \nallocation of unallocated barachois as well as barachois which were already occupied prior to \nthe establishment of the policy. It also outlines the rent applicable for occupying the \nbarachois, the monitoring plan of the activities carried out thereat and the modalities for \nLease Agreement with promoters.  \nCurrently, there are two barachois which are operational in Poudre d’Or, and have been \nallocated to promoters, and not leased to them. These are as follows – \n(i) \nBarachois Lagesse also known as Petit Barachois allocated on 09 January 2024 \nfor oyster culture to Persand Royal Company Ltd having as director Mr Khemraj \nPersand and address Couacaud Road, Grand Gaube, and \n\n123 \n \n(ii) \nGrand Barachois also known as Bassin Humbert allocated to Mauricoast Ltd on \n17 September 2015, having as director Mr Yashodhar Boygah and address \nMaurel Road, Rivière du Rempart. \nThe activities carried out by the abovementioned promoters are as follows – \n(i) \nBarachois Lagesse also known as Petit Barachois  \nPersand Royal Company Ltd has been allocated the Petit Barachois of an extent \nof 19 Arpents for the barachois and 3A 25 Perches for the adjoining state land for \noyster culture for a period of three years which was to be carried out jointly with \nthe Aquaculture Division of Albion Fisheries Research Centre of my Ministry.  \n \nFollowing a site visit in March 2025, it has been observed that the species that are \ncurrently farmed in plastic drums in the barachois are oysters, clams and crabs. \nTrials on sea urchins farming through the fattening method has also been \nundertaken. Future development in the barachois include the construction of a \nhatchery, a depuration station and a laboratory. A Lease Agreement which is \ncurrently at the level of the Attorney General’s Office will soon be signed with \nthe company.  \n(ii) \nGrand Barachois also known as Bassin Humbert \nMauricoast Ltd has been allocated the Grand Barachois of an extent of 110 \nArpents 02 Perches for the barachois and 11 A 85 Perches for the adjoining state \nland for mud crab, sea cucumber and oyster aquaculture project for an initial \nperiod of five years renewable on mutual consent.  \nFollowing a site visit in March 2025, it has been observed that the species that are \ncurrently farmed in the barachois are oysters and mud crabs. There was also seed \nproduction of sea cucumber and sea cucumber juveniles have been released in the \nbarachois. Trials on production of saline tolerant Tilapia have been undertaken in \nrecent years. Future development plan includes production of high economic \nvalue neutraceuticals for the cosmetic and health industry. Following the \nsubmission of its project write up, the company has been favourably considered \nin an Assessment Committee in March 2025. A Lease Agreement will soon be \nsigned with the promoter.  \n\n124 \n \nAs regards part (b) of the question, no lease agreement has been signed with any \ncompany. \n \nFOOTBALL PITCH, BEL AIR – UPGRADING WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/344",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 344,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/344) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the football pitch situated \nbehind the St Esprit Church in Bel Air, he will state if he has been made aware of the bad \nconditions thereof and of its surrounding walls and, if so, indicate – \n(a) \nwhen remedial works will be carried out, and  \n(b) \nthe expected completion date thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the District Council of Flacq that it has 36 football grounds \nunder its jurisdiction. On 05 February 2025, a survey was carried out on all these grounds. It \nwas found that the fencing of the football ground situated behind St Esprit Church in Bel Air, \nRivière Sèche, is rusted and damaged, and needs to be replaced. The estimated cost of the \nrequired works stands at Rs2.5 million. \nThis project falls under the item “Construction and Upgrading of Amenities” \nprogramme.  The Council has already submitted a request for funds under the 2025/26 \nCapital Projects. Once the required budget is approved and funds are made available, \nremedial works will begin. \nThe expected implementation timeframe for the project is as follows – \n• \n1 month for tender, evaluation, and award of contract; \n• \n3 months for execution of works. \nIn total, the project is expected to take approximately four months to complete once \ninitiated. \n \nLAND DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN – PUBLICATION PROPOSITION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/345",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 345,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/345) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the Land \nDrainage Master Plan, he will state where matters stand as to the proposition to making the \ndocument public.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n\n125 \n \nSOCIAL WELFARE CENTRES – OFFICE ATTENDANTS –EMPLOYMENT \nCONDITIONS & TERMS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/346",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 346,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/346) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the Social \nWelfare Centres across the country, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information \nas to the number of Office Attendants currently working thereat, indicating – \n(a)  their terms and conditions of employment, including the salary scale thereof, and  \n(b)  the actions being envisaged to ensure that the terms and conditions of the contract \nof employment of these officers are in line with the provisions of the Workers’ \nRights Act 2024.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed that at present, one Office Care Attendant (restyled Office \nAuxiliary/Senior Office Auxiliary) is working at the Head Office of the Social Welfare \nDivision. There are no Office Attendants posted in Social Welfare Centres across the island. \nThe terms and conditions of employment are governed by the Scheme of Service for \nthe post which has been approved by the Ministry of Public Service and Administrative \nReforms. \nI wish to inform the House that the Office Auxiliary/Senior Office Auxiliary who is \nposted at the Social Welfare Division has been recruited by the Ministry of Public Service \nand Administrative Reforms on temporary capacity for a period of one year in the first \ninstance with effect from 18 June 2024.  \nDuring the temporary capacity, the Office Auxiliary/Senior Office Auxiliary is drawing \nsalary at the flat rate of Rs14,725 a month, plus salary compensation at approved rates.  \nI am informed that on completion of the temporary period, the Ministry of Public \nService and Administrative Reforms will initiate the process for employment of the officer on \npermanent and pensionable establishment subject to him being favourably reported upon. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am apprised that the terms and conditions of \nthe Office Auxiliary/Senior Office Auxiliary are in line with the provisions made in the \nScheme of Service of the said post specified under Regulation 15 of the Public Service \nCommission Regulations. The terms and conditions for this post are also governed by \nrecommendations of the Pay Research Bureau Report 2021. \n\n126 \n \n \nMORCS. LES PLAINES DE L’HERMITAGE, HIGHLANDS ROSE & PINEWOOD – \nMAINTENANCE SERVICES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/347",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 347,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/347) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Morcellements Les Plaines de \nl’Hermitage, Highlands Rose and Pinewood, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \nthe Municipal Council of Vacoas Phoenix, information as to the actions taken on complaints \nmade for the – \n(a) \nirregular garbage collection services; \n(b)  improper maintenance of green spaces, walking and jogging tracks, and  \n(c) \npoor street lightings thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nKREOL MORISIEN – PRIMARY SCHOOLS – TEACHING STAFF & LIMITATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/348",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 348,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/348) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to Kreol \nMorisien, he will state the number of primary schools where same –  \n(a) \nis being taught, indicating – \n(i)  \nthe number of teachers available therefor, and  \n(ii)  if any shortage of these teachers has been reported at the Ministry, and \n(b) \ncannot be taught and the reasons therefor, indicating the measures being \nenvisaged to address this issue.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 13 – ASBESTOS HOUSES–– MEASURES ENVISAGED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/349",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 349,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/349) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change \nwhether, in regard to housing units containing asbestos, he will state the number thereof \nidentified in Constituency No. 13, Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac, indicating the – \n(a)  expected time frame for the dismantling thereof, and  \n(b)  redeployment plan, if any, devised for the occupiers thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n\n127 \n \nCHIKUNGUNYA – REPORTED CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/350",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 350,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/350) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to Chikungunya, he will state the number \nof suspected cases thereof as at date, reported – \n(a) \nat public hospitals, community health centres and mediclinics, and \n(b) \nby private medical practitioners, indicating the number of positive cases thereof \nidentified.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nFSC/OECD REGIONAL CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE – MANDATE, \nEXPENDITURE & PERFORMANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/351",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 351,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/351) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the Financial \nServices \nCommission/Organisation \nfor \nEconomic \nCo-operation \nand \nDevelopment \n(FSC/OECD) Regional Centre of Excellence, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to the – \n(a) \nbackground, objectives and mandate thereof; \n(b) \nspecific achievements made under each of its objectives to date; \n(c) \nannual expenditure of the Centre; \n(d) \nkey performance indicators put in place to ensure that public funds are utilized \nefficiently, and \n(e) \nterm/duration of the Memorandum of Understanding between the FSC/OECD.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nDRUG ADDICTS – REHABILITATION PROTOCOLS – FUNDS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/352",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 352,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/352) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the rehabilitation of drug addicts, \nhe will state the – \n(a) \nprotocols put in place therefor, indicating the treatments administered; \n(b) \namount of funds spent by Government on such programs over the past three \nyears, indicating if any survey has been carried out to assess the effectiveness \nthereof, and \n\n128 \n \n(c) \nnumber of drug addicts salvaged from this scourge over the past ten years, \nindicating the number of cases of overdose recorded due to drug abuse.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nÎLE AUX BENITIERS – TRANSPARENCY IN MANAGEMENT – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/353",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 353,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/353) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to Île aux Benitiers, he will state \nthe measures being taken by his Ministry to ensure a transparent, participatory, and inclusive \napproach in the decision-making process regarding the management thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: An Inter-Ministerial Committee chaired by the Deputy Prime Minister and \ncomprising my colleague ministers from the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste \nManagement and Climate Change, the Ministry of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue \nEconomy and Fisheries, the Ministry of Tourism, the Ministry of Local Government, relevant \nstakeholders including technical experts, representatives of the local authority and the Police \nDepartment, was set up to collaboratively examine the management of Ile aux Benitiers.  \nSeveral joint site visits were also carried out to assess the nature and extent of damage \nto Ile aux Benitiers. As a result of which, structures were pulled down by the Special Mobile \nForce, procedures were initiated by my Ministry for the cleaning of the islet, a comprehensive \nderatisation exercise was undertaken in collaboration with the Ministry of Health and the \nMauritius Society for Animal Welfare assisted in capturing and bringing stray animals to \nmain land. \nConcurrently, a constant and inclusive dialogue was engaged with operators and traders \nactive on the islet with a view to regularising their status. Consultations were also held with \nthe ‘collectif’ and ‘plaisanciers’ of the region to best address their concerns. \nIn parallel, a dedicated Technical Committee under my Ministry is actively working out \na Sustainable Master Plan aimed at balancing ecological preservation with socioeconomic \nneeds. A follow-up site visit in this regard has been scheduled on 09 April 2025. \n \nRING ROAD PROJECT – PHASES 2 & 3 – IMPLEMENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/354",
      "sitting_id": "08-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 354,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/354) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to Phases 2 and 3 of \nthe Ring Road Project, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Road \nDevelopment Authority, information as to whether consideration will be given for the \nimplementation thereof and, if so, when and if not, why not. \n\n129",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/355",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 355,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/355) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Mauritius \nRevenue Authority, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom information as to \nthe number of entities registered for Value Added Tax thereat for the period 2019 to 2024, \nindicating the – \n(a) \nnumber of companies and persons registered therefor, and  \n(b) \nannual amount of tax collected therefrom.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the MRA that the total \nnumber of VAT registered entities, including companies and persons, was as follows – \n(i) \n16,231 in 2019; \n(ii) \n17,393 in 2020; \n(iii) 19,368 in 2021; \n(iv) 21,543 in 2022; \n(v) \n24,046 in 2023, and  \n(vi) 26,467 in 2024. \nRegarding part (a) of the question, I am tabling the number of VAT registered entities, \nincluding the number of companies and persons. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, the total amount of VAT collected was as follows – \n\n22 \n \n(i) \nRs35.8 billion in 2019; \n(ii) \nRs29.6 billion in 2020; \n(iii) Rs31.5 billion in 2021; \n(iv) Rs43.4 billion in 2022; \n(v) \nRs50.6 billion in 2023, and \n(vi) Rs57 billion in 2024. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. \nYes, please. \nMr Beechook: Merci, Madam Speaker. From information I gather, some 20,000 \nbusinesses ceased operations from 2019 to 2024. No doubt thousands of SMEs ran out of \nbusiness due to an average inflation rate of 3.5%. Since the VAT threshold of Rs6 million has \nremained unchanged for almost a decade, will the hon. Prime Minister, Minister of Finance, \nout of compassion, kindly consider increasing that VAT threshold in order to support SMEs \nwhich are the backbone of this economy? \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \nThe Prime Minister: In fact, when you say that for a decade it has not changed, well, \nit has nearly changed – it was Rs4 million in 2015, and it became Rs6 million, but, as the \nhon. Minister of Commerce has said, the problem is that we have a huge debt. I cannot afford \nto allow the debt to increase. We just cannot do it! \nMadam Speaker: Yes. Hon. First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix! \nPHOENIX – NEW POLICE STATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/356",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 356,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/356) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the proposed \nconstruction of a new Police Station at Phoenix, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Commissioner of Police, information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat the Phoenix Police Station is housed in its current location since 1959. The Phoenix \nPolice Station serves an extensive jurisdiction covering approximately 21 square kilometres, \n\n23 \n \nwith an estimated population of 125,000 residents. It provides law enforcement services to \nseveral localities, including commercial zones and shopping malls. \nI am further informed, Madam Speaker, by the Commissioner of Police that a tender \nhas been launched on 28 March 2025, for the construction of a new, modern Police Station at \nPhoenix. The new Police Station will be constructed adjacent to the existing building and is \ndesigned to meet the contemporary needs of the Police in the region. The construction is \nexpected to start in August of this year. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, alright. Hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nMAURITIUS POLICE FORCE – NEW RECRUITS & BASIC SALARY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/357",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 357,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/357) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nMauritius Police Force, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner \nof Police, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of Police Officers recruited since 2019 to date on a yearly basis, per \nbatch, indicating the number of officers who have – \n(i) \nsuccessfully completed the training programme, and  \n(ii) \nleft the Police force and the reasons thereof, and  \n(b) \nstarting basic salary of new recruits.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, as regards parts (a)(i) and (ii) of the question, I \nam tabling the information requested by the hon. member.  \nHowever, I wish to highlight that from 2019 to 2024, out of a total of 2,511 recruits, \n159 have resigned for various reasons. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, the starting salary for Temporary Police \nConstables/Woman Police Constables is Rs18,650 monthly. After completion of the Recruit \nFoundation Course, which varies from six to nine months, they are also paid a salary \ncompensation of Rs4,010 which then brings their gross salary to Rs22,660. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \n\n24 \n \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. Le Premier ministre peut-il informer la \nChambre quels sont les critères de recrutement pour la force policière qui sont actuellement \nen cours ? \nThe Prime Minister: This is the same criteria laid down by the Discipline Forces \nService Commission, Madam Speaker. I believe, when I was Prime Minister, I myself asked \nfor it to be changed to lower the entry requirements. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente, le Premier ministre peut-il nous dire comment est \ncalculé le nombre de policiers qui doivent être recrutés chaque année, et combien de policiers \ndoit-on avoir dans chaque poste de police – si jamais il a les informations, bien sûr ? \nThe Prime Minister: Difficult to say that. In fact, it is like asking how long is a piece \nof string; we cannot just say that. I do not know. Apparently, they recruit when there is \nactually the need for recruitment. This is what we are told. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. Le Premier ministre vient de nous dire \neffectivement qu’il compte revoir les critères de recrutement dans la mesure du possible… \n(Interruptions) \nNon ? Ce n’est pas cela qu’il a dit ? Mais, moi, ma question est la suivante, Madame \nla présidente. Ne pense-t-il pas que la qualification académique minimum pour la force \npolicière – et je vais dire pourquoi – devrait être le School Certificate, mais aussi privilégier \nle physique, parce que, de nos jours, quand nous sommes sur le terrain, le constat qu’on fait \nmalheureusement, ce sont des policiers qui n’ont pas le physique de l’emploi ? Le Premier \nministre peut-il nous dire s’il compte revoir ces critères et favoriser les recrues qui ont un \nphysique à faire douter les voyous ? \n (Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: Thank you. I believe that is what I said… \n(Interruptions) \nI believe that I myself… \n(Interruptions) \n\n25 \n \nMr Quirin: Next time! \nMadam Speaker: Very interesting! \nThe Prime Minister: Next life! \n(Interruptions) \nI believe I myself, when I was Prime Minister, asked – and it was done – that we reduce \nthe entry requirements to a lower level. And as for the physical, I have already mentioned \nthat, but I think I must agree; there are certain cases… \nMadam Speaker: It exists… \nThe Prime Minister: …where we see… \nMadam Speaker: It exists already! \nThe Prime Minister: It exists…  \nMadam Speaker: Of course! \nThe Prime Minister: … I think, as far as I know, because I asked for it to be reduced. I \nthink it has been reduced because I remember Père Grégoire came to see me to thank me for \nthat because he felt that certain communities were being discriminated, but, as you say, I \nagree with you that the physique of the person is very important. I believe it is being taken \ncare of. What happens probably is that they grow fat afterwards. \n(Interruptions) \nMs Anquetil: Elle est bonne celle-là ! \nMadam Speaker: But they go for training. They do training every day from what I \nknow!  \nYes, where are we now? Hon. Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue, Mr Caserne! \nMAURITIAN PASSPORT – BIOMETRIC FORMAT – CONVERSION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/358",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 358,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/358) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \n\n26 \n \nregard to the Mauritian passport, he will state if consideration will be given for the \nconversion thereof into biometric format and, if so, when and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, as announced in the Government Programme \n2025-2029, my Government will introduce biometric passport with advanced encryption and \nanti-tampering mechanism. \nThe biometric passports, known as e-Passports, will incorporate biometric data which \nwill facilitate the verification of the identity of the passport holder. It will also reduce the risk \nof identity fraud. It will also ensure faster immigration clearance, and visa waivers for many \ncountries. Many countries tend to waive the visa requirement if you have the biometric \npassport.  \nMy Office, in collaboration with the Ministry of Information Technology, \nCommunication and Innovation, is currently working on the specifications for the biometric \npassport. \nThere was an attempt to do that in the past, but cela paraissait très louche. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nPOLICE INQUIRIES – RESPONSIBLE OFFICERS’ RANKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/359",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 359,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/359) Mrs A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Police inquiries, he will, for the benefit of the house, obtain from the Commissioner \nof Police, information as to the rank of the Police Officers responsible for the determination \nof the section of the law under which charges are preferred against suspects, indicating if \nlegal advice is sought prior thereto.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat, in accordance with section 131 of the Police Standing Orders, the responsibility to \ndetermine the section of the law under which charges are preferred against accused parties, \nrests upon completion of the enquiry. It is as follows – \n(i) \nFor cases classified as crimes, it is by the Superintendent of Police and above; \n\n27 \n \n(ii) \nFor cases classified as Misdemeanours, it is by Assistant Superintendent of Police \nand above, and \n(iii) For cases classified as contraventions, it is by Chief Inspector of Police/Inspector \nof Police and above. \nCertain cases that are not classified as either a crime, a misdemeanour, or a \ncontravention, such as industrial accidents and injuries, loss of documents and cards, minor \nroad traffic accidents, and missing persons, are dealt with an officer not below the rank of \nChief Inspector of Police. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed by the Commissioner of Police that for certain \noffences under specific legislation, such as drug offences, fatal road accidents, homicides, \nand sexual offences, after completion of the enquiry, such cases are referred to the Office of \nthe Director of the Public Prosecutions for advice. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMrs Savabaddy: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Will the hon. Prime Minister agree with \nme that sometimes the charges against suspects are not proportionate to the offences? Cases \nof severe wounds and blows or severe assault causing effusion of blood, for example, end up \nas simple larcenies, and this must be addressed. Can the Police take legal advice from the \nDPP before levelling proper charges against accused parties so that the faulters do not get \naway scot-free? Thank you. \nThe Prime Minister: I will certainly pass on that suggestion to the Police. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Hon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \n2% CORPORATE CLIMATE RESPONSIBILITY LEVY – MUR 50 MILLION \nTURNOVER FIRMS – REVENUE GENERATED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/360",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 360,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/360) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the 2 per cent Corporate Climate Responsibility levy charged on firms having a \nturnover of more than MUR 50 million in the global business sector, he will – \n\n28 \n \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Revenue Authority, \ninformation as to the revenue generated since its introduction to date, and  \n(b) \nstate its impact on the global business sector, indicating the purpose thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, as regards part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed by the Mauritius Revenue Authority that the revenue generated since the \nintroduction of the levy up to end of March 2025 amounted to Rs2.1 billion, out of which, \nRs652 million were paid by enterprises holding a global business licence. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Mauritius Revenue Authority \nthat the effective rate of the levy for many enterprises in the global business sector is actually \n0.4% or lower in view of the fact that these enterprises avail themselves of a partial \nexemption of 80% on specified income or foreign tax credit offsets. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Jhummun: Can the hon. Prime Minister inform the House whether there is the \npossibility of removing the 2% levy tax because other jurisdictions like the Islands of Man \nand Jersey, our two main competitors, have a lower rate than us? \nThe Prime Minister: In fact, I wish to inform the House that representatives of the \nglobal business sector have expressed concerns about the CCR levy, claiming that it will \nnegatively affect the long-term competitiveness of the services sector.  \nI am informed by the Financial Services Commission that data for the period July to \nDecember 2024 – which I think you asked for – is 6 months after the announcement of the \nintroduction of the CCR levy. Therefore, the new global business company licence has \nincreased by an average of 8% compared to the period of July to December 2023. \nNow, these concerns are being analysed by my Ministry, together with the Ministry of \nFinancial Services and Economic Planning, in consultation with the Mauritius Revenue \nAuthority, the Financial Services Commission, and other concerned stakeholders. \nTo complete, the CCR levy was applied indiscriminately to all enterprises with a \nturnover exceeding Rs50 million. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Second Member for Grand’Baie and Poudre d'Or! \n\n29 \n \nGOODLANDS POLICE STATION – POLICE OFFICERS & VEHICLES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/361",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 361,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/361) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand'Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nGoodlands Police Station, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to – \n(a) \nthe number of – \n(i) \nPolice Officers posted thereat, indicating their respective rankings;  \n(ii) \nvehicles attached thereto, and  \n(b) \nthe measures, if any, being envisaged to increase the manpower thereat for more \neffective policing within its jurisdiction.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat Goodlands Police Station covers an area of 33 km2 and has a population of \napproximately 34,000 residents. The station's jurisdiction includes the areas of Goodlands, \nPetit Raffray, Roche Terre, Cottage, and Saint Antoine. \nThe number of staff at Goodlands Police Station has increased over the past years due \nto the increase in economic and commercial activities as well as traffic flow in the areas. \nPresently, there are 88 Police Officers of different ranks posted at the Goodlands Police \nStation. \nAs regards part (a)(i) of the question, the number of Police Officers posted at \nGoodlands Police Station is as follows – \nAssistant Superintendent of Police \n- \n1 \nChief Inspector of Police \n- \n2 \nInspector of Police \n- \n3 \n\n30 \n \nPolice Sergeant \n- \n21 \nWoman Police Sergeant \n- \n3 \nPolice Constable \n- \n45 \nWoman Police Constable \n- \n13 \nAs regards part (a)(ii) of the question, two Police vans are attached to the Police \nStation. \nAdditionally, Goodlands Police Station is supported by Police Officers from other units \nand branches of the Police Force. I should say, if there are major events, additional personnel \nfrom other police stations are also called upon to reinforce the personnel of Goodlands Police \nStation. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that \nthe Police contingent at Goodlands, supported by 26 Safe City Cameras and resources from \nother units and branches, is adequate for effective policing in the area. \nHowever, Madam Speaker, I am informed that the current building housing the Police \nStation dates back to 55 years ago, and with the increase in services to be delivered, the office \nand parking spaces thereat are now found to be insufficient. It is, therefore, proposed that – I \nthink the procedures have already started – a new police station be built to relocate that police \nstation. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister!  \nYes, the hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues, Mr Edouard! \nRODRIGUES – NEW ECONOMIC MODEL PLEDGE (GOVERNMENT \nPROGRAMME 2025-2029)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/362",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 362,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/362) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \n\n31 \n \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands  whether, in regard to Government’s \npledge to construct “A new Economic Model” for Mauritius and particularly to pay an urgent \nand special attention to Rodrigues as outlined in the Government Programme 2025-2029, he \nwill state the measures and/or actions being envisaged to achieve same for Rodrigues.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the Government Programme 2025-2029 is a \nProgramme for the Republic of Mauritius, including Rodrigues and the Outer Islands. \nWe recognise that each outer island has their own specificities. \nIn this context, at Paragraph 19 of the Government Programme, we have stressed that \n“Government will pay urgent and special attention to Rodrigues, Agalega, and St Brandon”.  \nWith regard to Rodrigues, the Government Programme also announces that – \n(i) \nthe development of the airport in Rodrigues will be integrated in the master plan \nfor the overall development of our airports; \n(ii) \nspecial attention will be given to the water situation through the improvement of \nthe distribution network and storage system; \n(iii) food security will be enhanced through an agricultural land suitability mapping, \nthe rational use and management of prime agricultural land and introduction of \nthe latest methodology for the traceability of food and food products; and \n(iv) a Land Drainage Masterplan will be commissioned by the Land Drainage \nAuthority. The consultancy contract has already been awarded. \nMadam Speaker, as announced in the Government Programme, we are coming up with \na new economic model, on which we will elaborate in the forthcoming Budget, taking into \nconsideration the state of the economy.   \nHowever, nobody knew in what precarious economic situation the previous regime has \nleft the country. \nTotal public sector debt, as hon. Yeung Sik Yuen just mentioned, as a percentage of \nGDP is just over 90% and budget deficit would be above 9% by June of this year. \n\n32 \n \nWe need to bring down the level of budget deficit and public sector debt, and this will \nbe the priority of the Government. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Edouard! \nMr Edouard: Merci, Madame la présidente. Depuis les années soixante, on a parlé de \nla nécessité de prendre des mesures pour que Rodrigues puisse rattraper son retard sur \nMaurice dans les différents secteurs ? \nThe Prime Minister: Je n’ai pas trop bien compris la question. \nMadam Speaker: It is a tall order. He is talking about catching up… \nThe Prime Minister: On? \nMadam Speaker: …development in Rodrigues in general. Is that right, Mr Edouard? \nMr Edouard: Oui. \nMadam Speaker: Oui, voilà ! \nMr Edouard: Le retard que Rodrigues a accumulé. On a pris l’engagement, on a fait la \npromesse qu’on va faire en sorte que Rodrigues puisse rattraper son retard sur Maurice. Mais \nau fil des années, on a vu que l’écart se creuse par rapport au développement… \nMadam Speaker: Don’t make a statement! \nMr Edouard: Mais est-ce que le Premier ministre peut nous dire si ce gouvernement \nva prendre l’engagement de faire en sorte, autant que possible, pour que Rodrigues puisse \nrattraper son retard dans les différents secteurs ?  \nThe Prime Minister: I would love to be able to say yes, but we have to take into \naccount the context of this economic situation, which is disastrous. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, Mr Beechook, Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil! \nBAIE JACOTET CABLE LANDING STATION – ALLEGED SNIFFING CASE – \nINQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/363",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 363,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/363) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the inquiry \n\n33 \n \ninitiated into an alleged case of sniffing at the Baie Jacotet Landing Station, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to where \nmatters stand.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, let me from the very outset point out to the \nHouse, that there had been serious allegations in the public, including the press and social \nmedia, with regard to potential installation and use of equipment for sniffing the internet \ntraffic to and from Mauritius at the Baie Jacotet Cable Landing Station. \nThe former Chief Executive Officer of Mauritius Telecom, Mr M. S., had during the \nlive radio programme ‘Au coeur de l’info’, on Radio Plus, on 01 July 2022, publicly made \nallegations to the effect that a foreign team had been allowed to make interventions on the \nSAFE Cable and which acts might constitute a threat to National Security, and violation of \nthe fundamental rights of expression as enshrined in our Constitution.  \nThese allegations have seriously affected the image of Mauritius Telecom which owns \nthe Station, and have also tarnished the image of Mauritius both locally and internationally. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that, following the \nallegation on the radio programme, the former Prime Minister made a statement to the Police \non 11 July 2022 in respect of a case of ‘Diffusing false news’ against Mr M. S. intimating \nthat, at no moment, he had given instructions to the latter or Mauritius Telecom to allow any \nforeign party or Telecom Operator to install or use equipment to enable sniffing, interception, \nmonitoring or recording of internet traffic to and from Mauritius and/or countries in the \nregion. \nFurthermore, the Police subsequently received four other complaints following that \nallegation. These cases have been referred to the Central Criminal Investigation Department \nfor investigation as they relate to the same facts and the circumstances as the case reported by \nthe former Prime Minister on 11 July 2022. \nIn the course of Police investigation, between the 11 July 2022 to 03 February 2025, \ntwenty-three persons were interviewed in connection with the cases and their statements were \nrecorded.  \nAs of 10 April 2025, no person has been arrested in connection with these cases. \nSurprisingly, no one had been before.  \n\n34 \n \nThe inquiry is going on and I am setting up, I should say, a National Crime Agency \nwhich I mentioned before and which will enlist the services of foreign investigators to shed \nlight into such high-profile cases. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and \nRose Belle, Mr Seeburn! \nAIR MAURITIUS LTD – FINANCIAL SITUATION (2014-2024) – LOSSES \nINCURRED & CAPITAL INJECTED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/364",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 364,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/364) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Air \nMauritius Ltd., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to the \nfinancial situation thereof for the period December 2014 to December 2024, indicating if – \n(a)  any losses were incurred during that period, particularly in relation to the sale of \naircrafts, and  \n(b)  capital was injected therein and, if so, the reasons therefor.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed that for Financial Year 2013-2014, Air Mauritius Ltd realised a profit of \nRs359,219,000, whereas from 2015 to 2024, Air Mauritius Ltd incurred a loss amounting to \nRs17,721,683,000. We cannot even call this mismanagement. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed by Air Mauritius Ltd that during the Financial Year \n2017-2018, the company disposed of one A340-300 aircraft on a Sale and Lease Back \narrangement and this incurred a loss of Rs107,800,000. \nIn Financial Year 2021-2022 when the company was placed under voluntary \nadministration, the following aircrafts were disposed of – \n(i) \nin June 2021, two A319-100 aircraft and consequently, losses to the tune of \nRs338,100,000 were incurred, and \n(ii) \nin November 2021, one A330-200 aircraft was sold and a loss amounting to \nRs637,000,000 was recorded. \n\n35 \n \nIt is worth highlighting that in June 2021, Air Mauritius Ltd entered into a consignment \nagreement with a private company for the disassembling of two A340-300 aircrafts estimated \nat Rs220,500,000 to have them as spare parts for sale by the private company to any third \nparty. The sum received from the partial disposal of the two aircraft was Rs151,900,000, out \nof which Air Mauritius Ltd received Rs83,300,000. It was an agreed formula that Air \nMauritius Ltd incurred a loss of Rs137,200,000.  \nThe net loss incurred for the sale of aircraft amounts to Rs1,220,100,000.  \n(Interruptions) \nThis is how they managed Air Mauritius! This is what they did! It’s a crime! \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed that Government has not injected \ncapital directly in Air Mauritius Ltd but it did so indirectly through Airport Holdings Ltd \n(AHL) by providing the latter with an advance of Rs12 billion in September 2021 in the \ncontext of the Watershed meeting to enable the company to provide funds to Air Mauritius \nLtd – don’t forget that an Administrator was appointed – for meeting its urgent financial \nrequirements and to cater for other associated cost. I am informed that this advance was used \nby AHL as follows – \n• \nRs9.5 billion as loan to Air Mauritius; \n• \nRs812 million for acquiring shares of Air Mauritius Limited; \n• \nRs42 million for acquiring shares of Pointe Coton Resort Hotel Company Ltd; \n• \nRs135 million for acquiring shares of Jet Prime Ltd; \n• \nRs14 million injected as capital in subsidiaries of AHL; \n• \nRs1.007 billion as loans to subsidiaries of AHL; and \n• \nRs324 million for the acquisition of floors at MEDCOR building; \n• \nfurther, Rs166 million on the administrative expenses from August 2021 to June \n2024. \nMadam Speaker, the Ministry of Finance needed Rs25 billion to show, to fool the \npeople, to give the illusion that there is economic growth. In fact, they needed Rs25 billion to \nshow that the debt was lower as related to the GDP ratio.  This is what they did: lies, \nillusions, false figures! AHL was set up comprising 23 entities, including Air Mauritius Ltd. \n\n36 \n \nThe actual net assets were valued at Rs10 billion. However, a goodwill amount of Rs41 \nbillion was added to the Rs10 billion to reach a figure of Rs51 billion.  \nWhat is worst, Madam Speaker, is that the MIC was instructed to buy 49 % of AHL at a \nvalue of Rs51 billion. MIC paid Rs25 billion to acquire 49 % of the shares of AHL where the \nactual assets were worth only Rs5 billion. In other words, somebody has stolen the money – \nin other words – and we will find out. No culprit will be left without being forfeited! \nAnd I must emphasise, Madam Speaker, that the World Bank has confirmed that the \n49% was worth only Rs5 billion. Confirmed by the Worl Bank! This is a case of excessive \novervaluation carried out at the expense of MIC, which is 100 % owned by the Bank of \nMauritius. It will mean, therefore, that MIC will have to impair with obvious consequences. \nI wish to apprise the House that, following the injection of Rs25 billion by the \nMauritius Investment Corporation in AHL on 09 December 2021, AHL reimbursed the \nadvance of Rs12 billion to Government on the same day – same day transaction.   \nOn its part, Air Mauritius reimbursed an amount of Rs830 million to AHL and an \nadditional amount of Rs622 million has been offset by AHL through the purchase of the \nsubsidiaries of Air Mauritius. \nThe House may also wish to note that the Board of AHL has at its meeting held in \nMarch 2025, agreed to convert the remaining loan balance of Rs8.045 billion of Air \nMauritius Ltd into Non-Voting Convertible Redeemable Preference Shares. \nMadam Speaker, KPMG has been requested by AHL to probe into an amount of Rs2.5 \nbillion which should have been retained for working capital – cash flow need for MK, but \nwas instead used for other purposes for which we have yet to understand where the money \nwent if there was proper authorisation as that amount was derogated from its original \npurpose. A forensic audit by KPMG is underway to understand all these very loose \ncalculations that were done. \nMadam Speaker: I am sorry, time is up! Time is up! No supplementary! \nMr Quirin: Pena kestion? First time! \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, the Table has been advised that the following PQs \nhave been withdrawn: B/366, B/374, B/381, B/391, B/393, and B/394.  \nI now call on Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes, Ms Anquetil! \n \n\n37 \n \n \nPAVILLON FOOTBALL GROUND – STREET LIGHTINGS – MAINTENANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/365",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 365,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/365) MS S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre \n Bornes) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Pavillon Football \nplayground in Quatre Bornes, he will state if consideration will be given to – \n(a) \nimprove the lighting thereof; \n(b) \nreplace the defective fencing, and  \n(c)  fix the rocky surface thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Municipal Council of Quatre \nBornes that there are 13 floodlights at Pavillon Football Ground. These are the combination \nof LED and Halogen and they are broad-beamed, high intensity artificial light providing \nfunctional area lighting.  \nWith regard part (a) of the question, the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes has \napprised that according to a survey carried out on 19 March 2025, four units of those \nfloodlights were found to be defective and consequently have to be replaced. Quotations are \nbeing sought by the council for the purchase of four LED floodlights to replace the defective \nones by end of April 2025. \nIn addition, in order to increase the luminosity thereat, the council has decided to fix \none additional unit of floodlight on each pole. This project will be undertaken in the next \nfinancial year. \nMadam Speaker, as for the part (b) of the question, I am advised that the fencing of the \nfootball ground was fixed more than 20 years ago. The metal poles holding them are in an \nadvanced state of decay and rusting. This is a glaring example of how the former government \nfailed to maintained sport infrastructure.  \nI am further advised by the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes that in the first \ninstance, for the security and safety of joggers and players, one side of the fence of a length \nof 110 metres has already been removed. Actions are being taken to replace the defective \nfence of 110 metres out of 460 metres. Bids were launched under the Small Committee \nProjects through restricted bidding on 07 March 2025. The closing date for submission was \non 18 March 2025. Three bids have been received; the Executive Committee held on 03 April \n2025 approved the lowest substantially responsive bid. The expected start date of the works is \non 30 April 2025 and the expected completion date is 30 July 2025. \n\n38 \n \nIn view of the fact that the funds are not available in this financial year, the replacement \nof the remaining 350 metres chain link fencing and including minor levelling works inside \nthe football playground will be carried out in the next financial year. \nMadam Speaker, I am now answering part (c) of the question. According to the \nMunicipal Council of Quatre Bornes, as a result of continuous use of the ground throughout \ntime, the soil has settled and the rocks were spotted at the playground. These rocks have been \nremoved by in-house labour. Let us reassure the House, that my Ministry is closely \nmonitoring the implementation of all remedial works with the assistance of all local \nauthorities. The safety of our citizens is our utmost priority. Unlike the former government, \nwe are committed to improve our sport infrastructure and other amenities.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Ms Anquetil! \nMs Anquetil : Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Madam Speaker, may I ask the \nMinister what specific measures will be put in place to ensure the regular upkeep and long-\nterm maintenance of the Pavillon Football Ground upon completion of the proposed \nimprovement works? Thank you! \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes will \nimplement a structured maintenance programme upon completion of the improvement works \nonce it’s completed. And, this will include routine inspections, timely repairs, cleaning and \nupkeep of all the key components such as lightings, fencing and playground. A dedicated \nteam within the Council will oversee all these tasks and provision has been made in the \nannual budget to ensure the sustainability and safety of the facility in the long term.  \nMs Anquetil: A last one, Madam Speaker? \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMs Anquetil: Thank you. Madam Speaker. In the event that the Pavillon Football \nGround is temporarily closed to facilitate renovation works, will the Minister indicate \nwhether alternative recreational facilities will be made available to the local community \nduring that period? Thank you.  \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Council that these renovation \nworks of the Pavillon Football Ground would not necessitate any temporary closure.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay. That’s it. \nYes, hon. Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue, Mr Caserne! \n\n39 \n \nSOCIAL WELFARE CENTRES – CHAIRPERSON & MEMBERS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/366",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 366,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/366) Mrs A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to Social \nWelfare Centres, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Sugar Industry \nLabour Welfare Fund, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber thereof, and  \n(b) \nprocedures established for the election of the Chairperson and members of the \ncommittees thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSTRAY DOGS – REMEDIAL ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/367",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 367,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/367) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nwhether, in regard to stray dogs, he will state if he has been made aware of the increasing \nnumber thereof over the past five years and, if so, indicate the remedial actions being \nenvisaged in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you. Madam Speaker, the issue of stray dogs is one of our priorities \nand we are adopting a humane and multi-stakeholder approach to ensure long-term \nsustainable solutions. I co-chaired a meeting with the Junior Minister, the hon.  David, on 17 \nMarch 2025, along with key stakeholders, including NGOs, the vet professionals and the \nMauritius Society for Animal Welfare to take stock of all the issues.  \nMadam Speaker, following proposals spearheaded by animal welfare advocates, a \nseries of actions are being undertaken – \na) the board of MSAW has been reconstituted with Ms Ghoorah as part-time \nChairperson; \nb) the Mauritius Society for Animal Welfare will be restructured to be an \ninternationally compliant body to access global support; \nc) collaboration with foreign veterinary professionals has been sought, particularly \nfrom India, to review the mass sterilisation programme, humane dog-catching \nmethods and the Catch-Neuter-Release approach currently implemented by \nMSAW; \n\n40 \n \nd) the Commissioner of Police has been requested to inform as to whether stun-gun \nor anaesthetic darts could be used for catching of dogs; \ne) the Veterinary Council has been requested to expedite registration of Veterinary \nProfessionals; \nf) \nthe Animal Welfare Act of 2013 is being reviewed to empower MSAW to act \nagainst animal abuse, regulate dog breeding and importation, and introduce \nstronger penalties for defaulters;  \ng) \nThe Animal Welfare Act 2013 is being reviewed to empower MSAW to act \nagainst animal abuse, regulate dog breeding and importation, and introduce \nstronger penalties for defaulters; \nh) \nA first meeting to review the legislation was chaired by the Senior Chief \nExecutive on 26 March 2025 with representatives of NGOs. All proposals \nreceived thereon will be examined by different subcommittees to expedite its \ncoming into operation, and \ni) \nThe Ministry of Education and Human Resource has been requested to consider \nintegrating the concept of animal welfare into the education system to sensitise \nstudents from an early age. \nMeanwhile, MSAW is continuously implementing its sustainable project for dog \npopulation control through mass sterilisation, dog registration and Catch, Neuter and Release \nProgramme. The catch-neuter release method being used since 2022 no longer serves its \npurpose as stray dogs are being returned on the streets. This is why Government has taken the \nbold initiative to construct dog shelters region wise and an animal hospital. \nMadam speaker, it is worth to note that the last survey on stray dogs was conducted as \nfar back as December 2013 by the Humane Society International and it was reported that \nMauritius had a total unowned dog population of approximately 246,000 and roaming street \ndog population of 57,000. The report also indicated that a large majority of stray dogs’ \npopulation in Mauritius is owned, and the number of stray dogs was relatively low. \nThe Government is taking decisive action to implement a humane, sustainable and \ncollaborative approach to managing the stray dog population after years of inaction. The \nwelfare of animals and the safety of our citizens remain at the heart of the Government’s \ninitiative. \n\n41 \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes, hon. Caserne! \nMr Caserne: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I would like to thank the hon. Minister for \nhis reply. It is a concern. Recently, many incidents have been reported with regard to the issue \nof stray dogs, causing accidents. Mainly, the two-wheelers have being impacted. I thank the \nhon. Minister.  \nAnother phenomenon which has been brought to our attention is the rearing of cattle \nalso disturbing the peaceful environment within the region of Sainte Croix, Morcellement \nGoolamally and Morcellement Raffray. May I ask the hon. Minister if he can look into this \nissue also. \nDr. Boolell: I thank the hon. Member. We will seriously look into the matter.  \nLet me come to the issue of stray dogs. What we are trying to do is to increase the \nstabilisation rate to bring down the reproductive capacity. It is not an easy task, but we are \npraying and hoping that we will be there in due time. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Edouard! \nMr Edouard: Thank you, Madam Speaker. The problem of stray dogs and other \nanimals like cattle is also a big problem in Rodrigues. Will the hon. Minister inform the \nHouse if the actions proposed will be extended to Rodrigues also. \nDr. Boolell: Yes! \nMadam Speaker: I am sorry, does that not concern the Rodrigues government? \nDr. Boolell: The Rodrigues Regional Assembly.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nDr. Boolell: But the message will be conveyed loud and clear to our friends in the \nRodrigues Regional Assembly. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! I am a little bit surprised! \nEverything does not concern the Mauritian government since you have your autonomy now.  \nYes, hon. Mr A. Duval! \nMr A. Duval: Yes, thank you. Madam Speaker, there seems to be a degradation of stray \ndogs in Mauritius, unfortunately. Since it is recognised that the stray dogs, in fact, have \n\n42 \n \nowners, may we know from the hon. Minister, since November to date, how many \ncontraventions have been served to owners of stray dogs in combatting that fléau ? \nDr. Boolell: Well, I need notice of this question. But I can find out and relay the \ninformation to you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, next time! \n(Interruptions) \nWe have 15 more minutes to go. Let us carry on, please!  \nHon. Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil!  \nPOSTE DE FLACQ REGION– FLOOD MITIGATION PLAN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/368",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 368,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/368) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of National Infrastructure hether, in regard to the recurring flooding issues in Poste \nde Flacq and surrounding area and the subsequent site visit effected by Officers of the Land \nDrainage Authority on Wednesday 05 February 2025, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain information as to where matters stand as to the proposed mitigation actions plan to be \nimplemented thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the region of Poste de Flacq has \nbeen subject to recurrent flooding due to the swelling of Poste de Flacq River during \ntorrential rains. As the topography of the land is relatively flat with wide flood plains, severe \nflooding problems have been encountered in this region since 2008. Despite the \nimplementation of flood mitigating measures in 2013, these have not been successful in \nalleviating the flooding problems in the region. \nIn view thereof, several projects have been identified for implementation under the \nNational Flood Management Programme by the Land Drainage Auhtority, namely flood \nmitigating measures at Allée Mangues, Poste de Flacq, Debarcadère, La Source, Bramsthan, \nSeeraully and Cité Hibiscus. \nMadam Speaker, the site visit which was carried out on 05 February 2025 pertains \nparticularly to the flood mitigating measures at Allée Mangues, Poste de Flacq. I wish to \ninform the House that this region has been declared as a high-risk flood prone area by the \nLand Drainage Authority and the project was initially entrusted to the National Development \nUnit for implementation. \n\n43 \n \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that in October 2018, NDU appointed a \nconsultant for a feasibility study and the report was submitted in November 2019, that is, \nmore than one year later. A second contract was given to the same Consultant in January 2020 \nto submit a detailed design proposal. Only a preliminary design report was received in \nSeptember 2020 and discussions lingered between the NDU and LDA for one and a half year \nas to determine the best alternative to be adopted, that is, either Alternative 1, comprising the \nconstruction of a dike closer to the urbanised areas so as to increase the capacity of the river \nor Alternative 2, which involves the construction of a floodwall along the bank of Poste de \nFlacq on the urbanised side. \nSubsequently, the project was handed over to the Drains Infrastructure Construction Ltd \nin June 2022. The Project Consultant from DICL submitted a detailed design report in April \n2023. Following geotechnical investigations carried out in 2024, a supplementary report to \nthe detailed design report was forwarded to the Land Drainage Authority for approval. On 07 \nFebruary 2025, the authority conveyed its no objection, subsequent to which, the DICL \nrequested the project consultant to prepare the draft bidding document. \nI am now informed by the DICL that land acquisition procedures for 29 plots are \nongoing and it is expected that bids will be invited for the appointment of a contractor once \nwayleaves are obtained to be able to start the works. \nMadam Speaker, I would like to deplore the fact that it took nearly nine whole years to \nstart initiating actions to implement this project, least to say how urgent issues were being \ndealt with by the previous government. I am reassuring the House that now, my Ministry will \nensure that the works will be undertaken at the earliest possible. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to point out that in terms of short-term measures, the dredging \nof Poste de Flacq River was carried out by the NDU in November 2023 and by the District \nCouncil of Flacq in November 2024, respectively, in view to mitigate the risk of riverine \nflooding. Furthermore, I am informed that, the District Council is undertaking regular \ncleaning works and removal of debris and aquatic plants that obstruct waterflow to prevent \nflooding. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, next question. Hon. First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix! \n \n \n\n44 \n \nMORCELLEMENTS LES PLAINES DE L’HERMITAGE, HIGHLANDS ROSE & \nPINEWOOD – MAINTENANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/369",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 369,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/369) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Morcellements Les Plaines de \nL’hermitage, Highlands Rose and Pinewood, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Municipal Council of Vacoas Phoenix, information as to the actions taken on \ncomplaints made for the – \n(a) \nirregular garbage collection services; \n(b) \nimproper maintenance of green spaces, walking and jogging tracks, and \n(c) \npoor street lighting thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the Morcellement Les Plaines de \nl'Hermitage and Pinewood were set up more than 20 years ago, whereas Highland Rose was \nset up around the year 2017.  \nAs regard to part (a) of the question, the Municipal Council of Vacoas-Phoenix has \ninformed that no complaints have been received from the inhabitants of Morcellement Les \nPlaines de l'Hermitage and Pinewood regarding the scavenging service thereat. \nHowever, four complaints were registered at the Citizen Support Unit Portal from the \ninhabitants from Morcellement Highlands Rose on scavenging service and one on the \nremoval of bulky waste. \nMadam Speaker, each household is provided with scavenging service once weekly \neither in the morning shift or in the afternoon shift. The distribution of scavenging works for \nrefuse collection is undertaken on a zonal basis as follows – \n(i) \nMorcellement Les Plaines de Hermitage morning shift: Monday for zone \none and Tuesday for the remaining zone, and in the afternoon shift, it is on \nTuesday. \n(ii) \nMorcellement Highlands Rose morning shift: Thursday for one zone, \nFriday for another zone and Wednesday for the remaining zone. In the \nafternoon shift: Friday for one zone, Saturday for another zone and \nWednesday for the remaining zone, and \n\n45 \n \n(iii) \nMorcellement Pinewood, morning shift: Thursday for one zone, Friday for \nthe remaining zone. Afternoon shift: Friday for one zone and Saturday on \nthe remaining zone. \nMoreover, there should be a public holiday or any unforeseen circumstances, the \nCouncil ensures that the waste is collected from the household on the next day. Additionally, \nbulky waste collection is carried out twice yearly. The last exercise was conducted in some \nareas of aforementioned Morcellement on 05 and 06 October 2024. It is to be noted that \nRs328,432.82 were provided to the Council for this exercise instead of the required amount \nof Rs1.8 m. \nHence, the bulky waste collection would only be carried out for part of the \nMorcellement. The Council has already been given the green light to proceed with the second \ncampaign of bulky waste collection which will be done in May 2025. \nMadam Speaker, what is the use of participating in so many international conferences \non climate change and protection of the environment. Going as far as to pledge to save this \nplanet but failing to put words into action, they could not even cater for a basic service like \nrefuse collection – an absolute wastage of public funds. As a short-term measure, the \nMunicipal Council of Vacoas-Phoenix has been requested to inform every household as to \nthe exact date and time of waste collection. \nAdditionally, I have requested my Ministry to instruct the Council to ensure that \nscavenging service is provided to the entire Morcellement on one day or, at the most, two \ndays instead of splitting same into several days for different zones of the same Morcellement \nwith effect of 01 May 2025. \nMadam Speaker as for part (b) of the question, I am apprised by the Council that \nMorcellement Les Plaines de Hermitage has six lots of green space of a total extent of 11,672 \nm². Highlands Rose has 13 lots of green space of a total extent of 50,000 m² whereas \nPinewood has 10 lots of green space of the total extent of 55,700 m². Furthermore, there are \nno jogging tracks at Highlands Rose. However, there is one jogging track of 2 km at \nMorcellement Pinewood as well as one jogging track of 1 km at Les Plaines de Hermitage. \nMy Ministry has instructed the Municipal Council of Vacoas-Phoenix to initiate \nimmediate action for maintenance of all green spaces and jogging tracks within all the \naforementioned morcellements and other morcellements as well. My Ministry has also \n\n46 \n \nrequested the Council to prepare a proper maintenance plan so as to effect cleaning and \nmowing of the above morcellements by in-house labour on a monthly basis. \nMadam Speaker, as for part (c) of the question, the Council has informed that it has not \nreceived any complaints regarding the street lighting at Morcellement Pinewood. As for \nMorcellement Les Plaines de Hermitage, the Council reported a loss of street lighting cables \nthereat to the Moka Police Station on 23 December 2021. Financial clearance was obtained \nfrom then Ministry of Finance, Economic Planning and Development as far back as 26 July \n2024 to the tune of Rs1.5 m. for the repair of the street lighting network. The materials have \nalready been purchased. However, the street lighting cables have not been installed yet. \nNevertheless, I wish to assure the House that this Government is here to work for the \nbetterment of the inhabitants. The lost cables at Morcellement Les Plaines de Hermitage will \nbe replaced by the in-house labour and the works are expected to start as from this month \nitself. \nMadam Speaker, for the Morcellement Highlands Rose, a survey was carried out in \nJuly 2024 whereby it was observed that around 300 street lanterns were defective. Upon \ninvestigation, it was found that most of them date back to more than eight years and have \nreached their lifetime. Hence, replacing them with new ones would be more cost-effective \nand even then, nothing was done by the former government to remedy the situation. This \nclearly depict a severe lack of responsibility and seriousness when it comes to initiating \nprompt action for the well-being of the community which is not surprising when it concerns \nthe former government. \nMadam Speaker, I am now informed that the bidding documents are under preparation \nfor the acquisition of 300 street lanterns at an estimated cost of Rs3 m. for Morcellement \nHighlands Rose. My Ministry has requested the Council expedite matters in a bid to resolve \nthis issue as early as possible. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister. Are you happy with this? Very happy?  \nI have got three minutes left. Ms Anquetil! Question and short answer from Minister. \nNTC – RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN – FINANCIAL SITUATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/370",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 370,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/370) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the retirement benefit plan for the \n\n47 \n \nemployees of the National Transport Corporation, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Corporation, information as to the current financial situation of the fund set up \ntherefor.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I am informed by the NTC that it \nhas 93 employees governed by the PRB whose retirement benefit plan is carried out under the \nNTC Corporation Pension Fund. This fund which was created on 25 July 1979 in accordance \nwith the Statutory Bodies Pension Funds Act is administered and managed by SICOM. The \nmonthly contribution to pension fund for an employee is made at the rate of 11% of the \npensionable emoluments by the employer and 6% of the pension emoluments by the \nemployee. \n Madam Speaker, I am informed that the latest actuarial report of NTC Pension Fund \ndated 22 December 2022 indicates deficit of Rs231 m. This deficit has further increased to \nRs285.4 m. as per the consultation with SICOM in January 2025. Rs285.4 m. for 93 \nemployees tantamount to have to a hefty figure of more than Rs3 m. per employee. The \nactuarial firm recommended cash injections over a period of 5 to 10 years over a mix of cash \ninjections over a period of 5 to 10 years and an increase of the contribution by 3% to address \nthe situation. However, the recommendations were not implemented by the NTC.  \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that the actuarial review is carried out \nevery five years. The report in 2018 also indicated a deficit of Rs78.7 m. on the \nrecommendations made therein were not implemented. It is worth mentioning that we are in \nthis situation today as the past service deficit disclosed in previous valuations have not been \nfunded. Compound with that, as I have mentioned the House before, the financial accounts of \nthe last nine years were not prepared and audited for the NTC. These accounts, if prepared \nand audited, would surely have highlighted the situation of the pension fund and trigger \nappropriate notices by the Director of Audit. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: One? Two? \nMs Anquetil: Two very small. Thank you, Madam Speaker. Je suis choquée mais bon. \nWould the Minister clarify the responsibilities of the management and the board members of \nthe National Transport Corporation with regard to the pension rights of its employees? Thank \nyou. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, as I mentioned in the House before, and it is \nnow already well-known, the NTC was marred in a quagmire of corruption over the last nine \n\n48 \n \nyears. There are several enquiries going on at the FCC for fake spare parts, for tyres that last \nonly for 4000 km – never seen before! When I took office I cleanse to the management, we \nfired the then General Manager and now we are recruiting a new one through open \nadvertisement; it is being evaluated now. All the board members who were there have gone \nas well including the ex-officials, it is only left with one person now and he is elected by the \nworkers. His name is Mr Luchannah whom I have no say to his appointment over the board. I \nleave it to the employees of NTC to ask him how he has spent his years on the board of the \nNTC while this was happening before his own eyes. \nMadam Speaker: Last question. Yes! \nMs Anquetil: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Would the hon. Minister inform the House \nof remedial measures currently being envisaged. Thank you. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Well, first of all, to implement the recommendations of the \nactuarial review mainly to fund the past deficits I highlighted before. However, the NTC is \nnow a financial situation that it is in and we only know the state of affairs once the audited \naccounts have been completed. Only then, we can know the financial means available at the \nNTC to fund the pension funds which are due to the employees. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. I think we will break for an hour and a half. This time I \nam not mistaken. We coming back at to 14.30 hrs.  \nAt 1.02 p.m., the Sitting was suspended.  \nOn resuming at 2.33 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated! Okay, now I think we have hon. Second Member \nfor Grand Baie and Poudre d'Or, Mr Beejan! \nMORCELLEMENT MONT PLAISIR, FOND DU SAC – FLASH FLOODS VICTIMS– \nCOMPENSATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/371",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 371,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/371) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre D'or) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the damages caused by flash \nfloods to the residences of Morcellement Mont Plaisir in Fond Du Sac prior to November \n2024, he will state if consideration will be given for the compensation of the victims thereof. \nMadam Speaker: This question will be replied by hon. Minister of Social Integration, \nSocial Security and National Solidarity. Yes! \n\n49",
      "answer": "The Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity (Mr A. Subron): Yes, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker, let me first inform the House that my Ministry is considering the \nsetting up of a fund to compensate victims of climate-related disasters, first and foremost, to \nbereaved families who have lost their beloved ones and to people who have lost basic \nnecessities and properties during a flood or any other climate-related disasters. \nMadam Speaker, this Government, conscious of the deepening of the impact of the \nclimate crisis on our people, made an electoral pledge in the PTr/MMM/ND/ReA Electoral \nAgreement to set up a permanent compensation system for reparation to victims. Contrary to \nthe previous Government, we do not intend to address this issue on an ad hoc, piecemeal \nbasis. As soon as the mechanism and the financing of such a compensation scheme be \ndiscussed and finalised within Government, we will be in a position to specify the \nbeneficiaries and its retroactive application to past victims, including those who suffered \ndamages caused by the flash floods to the residences of Morcellement Mont Plaisir in Fond \nDu Sac prior to November 2024. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that presently, in accordance with the First \nSchedule of the Social Aid Regulations (1984), only the following allowances are payable by \nGovernment for cyclones and floods through my Ministry – \n(i) \na cyclone allowance of Rs250 per person per night spent at evacuee centres, and \n(ii) \na flood allowance of Rs250 per member of a family per day for a maximum of \nthree days subject to a police memo certifying that their premises have been \nflooded and their foodstuffs have been damaged. \nMadam Speaker, in this context, I am informed that following torrential rains in 2019 at \nFond Du Sac, the Ministry has effected payment of the above food allowance to the tune of \nRs79,352 to 141 households. Additionally, ad hoc compensation of Rs6,000 per adult and \nRs3,000 per child under 18 years was paid to them. Funds were received from the Prime \nMinister’s Relief Fund and a total amount of Rs1,761,000 was paid to 99 households by my \nMinistry. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes? \n\n50 \n \nMr Beejan: Can the hon. Minister clarify whether a formal assessment of the damages \nwas conducted at Fond Du Sac, as mentioned by the former Government, and if so, will the \nfindings be tabled? \nMr Subron: Thank you. As for the flood allowance that I mentioned, the assessment \nhas been made by the Police; the Police memo certifying that their premises have been \nflooded and their foodstuffs have been damaged. So, this allowance is paid by my Ministry.  \nAs for the fund payable from Prime Minister’s Relief Fund, I am not aware of the \ncriteria upon which the assessment was made but I will look into it and come back to the hon. \nMember in due course. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Second Member for Grand Baie and Poudre d'Or! \nVINGT PIEDS ROAD, GRAND’ BAIE & CAP MALHEUREUX – RESURFACING \nWORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/372",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 372,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/372) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to Vingt Pieds Road from \nGrand’Baie to Cap Malheureux, he will state when resurfacing works will be effected thereat, \nindicating the expected start and completion dates thereof and, if not, if consideration will be \ngiven for budgetary provisions to be secured therefor for the next financial year.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, the Vingt Pieds (B45) Road connects the villages of \nGrand Baie and Cap Malheureux and may be divided into four stretches, namely – \n(i) \nStretch 1 – from roundabout near La Croisette to junction with Plaine des \nPapayes (B11) Road near Shell filling station, over an approximate length of 1 \nkm; \n(ii) \nStretch 2 – from its junction with Plaine des Papayes (B11) Road to its junction \nwith Vieux Moulin (B165) Road, over an approximate length of 1.2 km; \n(iii) \nStretch 3 – from its junction with Vieux Moulin (B165) Road to the first \nroundabout of Cap Malheureux Bypass, over an approximate length of 2.2 km; \nand  \n(iv) \nStretch 4 – from the first roundabout of Cap Malheureux Bypass to its junction \nwith the Mon Choisy Cap Malheureux (B13) Road, over an approximate length \nof 1.6 km. \n\n51 \n \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the RDA that the Stretch 2 and Stretch 4 are in fairly \ngood conditions. As regard other stretches of the Vingt Pieds (B45) Road, during the current \nFinancial Year 2024-2025, the RDA will proceed with resurfacing works along Stretch 3, \nnamely from Vieux Moulin (B165) Road to the first roundabout of the Cap Malheureux \nBypass. Works Order to the tune of Rs12.5 million has already been issued in this respect and \nworks are expected to start in the third week of April and will be completed by the end of the \nmonth. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that as regards Stretch 1, from La Croisette roundabout \nto its junction with Plaine des Papayes (B11) Road, the presence of cracks and settlements \nhave been noted. The RDA has, accordingly, earmarked funds for resurfacing works along \nthat stretch during the Financial Year 2025-2026.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Will the hon. Minister inform the House \nwhether the resurfacing works at Chemin Vingt Pieds, Grand Baie, includes additional \nimprovements such as drainage upgrades, pedestrian pathways or street lighting to enhance \nroad safety? Thank you. \nMr Gunness: Madam Speaker, the original question concerns the resurfacing of an \nexisting road. So, there are no additional drain works or lighting. But anyway, I will ask the \nRDA to carry out a survey. If need be, we will see and do the needful if funds are available. \nMadam Speaker: Of course! Thank you, hon. Minister!  \nNow, the Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac, Mr Jhummun! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 13 – ASBESTOS HOUSING UNITS – DISMANTLING & \nREDEPLOYMENT PLAN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/373",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 373,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/373) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change \nwhether, in regard to housing units containing asbestos, he will state the number thereof \nidentified in Constituency No. 13, Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac, indicating the – \n(a) \nexpected time frame for the dismantling thereof, and  \n\n52 \n \n(b) \nredeployment plan, if any, devised for the occupiers thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Bhagwan: Madam Speaker, according to information obtained from the Ministry \nof Housing and Lands, I am informed that there were initially 3,013 ex-CHA/EDC housing \nunits containing cemented asbestos sheets, constructed in the 1960s over 59 sites island-wide. \nOf these, 366 were found in Constituency No. 13, Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac.  \nAccording to a joint survey carried out by officers of the Ministry of Housing and \nLands and the Solid Waste Management Division of my Ministry in 2022, there remains a \ntotal of 1,453 ex-CHA/EDC housing units that need to be dismantled. Out of the initial 366 \nhouses in Constituency No. 13, some 162 had already been demolished with remaining 204 \nhouses. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, there is no specific time frame for demolition of \nthese housing units as request for dismantling emanates from the owner directly or through \nthe Citizen Support Unit, local authorities, the Ministry of Housing and Lands and CEB \nofficers and are, thus, attended to on a case-to-case basis.  \nSince 2015, the Solid Waste Management Division of my Ministry procures the \nservices of contractors for the dismantling of houses containing asbestos and disposal thereof. \nRequests received from owners are, thus, directed to the contractor for necessary actions. A \ntotal of 218 housing units remained containing asbestos have just been dismantled around the \nisland from 2015 to 2024.  \nA new bidding exercise is being undertaken at the level of the Solid Waste Division of \nmy Ministry for dismantling, removal and disposal of cemented asbestos sheets from ex-\nCHA/EDC houses for a contract period of 24 months. It is expected to have a new contract by \nend of this month. \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed that all the targeted housing units could not be \ndismantled for the following reasons – \n(a) \nVery few requests for the dismantling of asbestos houses are received. \n(b) \nMany applicants are not owners of the housing units. They are either heirs or \ntenants without any formal document, and in many cases, are either abroad or \n\n53 \n \nuntraceable. It becomes difficult for the Ministry of Housing and Lands to \nestablish ownership of the houses. \n(c) \nIn cases of unoccupied houses where notices have been served and affixed by \nlocal authorities, and whose owners could not be traced during a survey, they \nintervene just prior to demolition of these houses and prevent the dismantling \nthereof. \n(d) \nOwners and occupiers also request for the reconstruction of their houses or for \nfinancial assistance prior to giving their consent for dismantling of the houses. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (b) of the question, my Ministry will consult the \nMinistry of Housing and Lands so we come up with a redeployment plan to address all the \nmentioned issues as there is actually no redeployment plan. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes! \nMr Jhummun: Thank you, hon. Minister. It is a request. Can the hon. Minister try to \narrange a meeting with all the inhabitants concerned and propose them with alternatives, such \nas the new houses that will be offered in Souillac? So, can a meeting with the inhabitants be \narranged? Thank you. \nMr Bhagwan: Definitely, Madam Speaker. My colleague and I have spoken, and we \nare moving in that direction once the Minister of Housing and Lands comes back.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay, thank you. Now, Mr Rookny, Third Member for \nPamplemousses and Triolet!  \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 4 – SPORTS FACILITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/374",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 374,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/374) Mrs A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to recreational sports, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Sports Council, information as to \nthe number of sports facilities of the Council available in Constituency No. 4, Port Louis \nNorth and Montagne Longue, indicating – \n(a) \ntheir locations, and  \n\n54 \n \n(b) \nthe activities held thereat since November 2024 to date and the mode of \ncommunication therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nNORTHERN REGION – IRRIGATION RESTRICTIONS – IMPACT & \nGOVERNMENT SUPPORT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/375",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 375,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/375) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses se& Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to limitations on irrigation imposed on the planters of the northern region, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether – \n(a) \nany survey has been carried out on the economic impact thereof on the planters, \nand  \n(b) \nGovernment proposes to provide any support thereto and, if so, give details \nthereof.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, the sustained, inadequate rainfall in the recent months \nhas resulted in a significant decline in water levels in the La Nicolière Reservoir and \nMidlands Dam. Consequently, the Water Resources Monitoring Committee, under the \nMinistry of Energy and Public Utilities, had to impose stringent conditions on water usage for \nirrigation through a series of regulations enacted under the Central Water Authority Act.  \nIn fact, since December 2022, restrictions have been consistently imposed on the \nirrigation of sugarcane for consecutive promulgation of a series of Dry Season Regulations \nunder the Central Water Authority Act.  \nAlso, the Central Water Authority, by virtue of its act, has priority of use over all water \nresources in times of drought. Therefore, penalising the Irrigation Authority. Consequently, \nthe Irrigation Authority has had to seize all irrigation of sugarcane since August 2024. In \ncontrast, vegetable crops are receiving only a minimal allocation of irrigation, three hours for \ntwo days a week, which is grossly inadequate for ensuring viable crop production. \nMadam Speaker, regarding part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the House that \napproximately 3,200 hectares of land in the northern region, occupied by some 3,500 small \n\n55 \n \nplanters and three corporate planters rely on La Nicolière Reservoir, have experienced \nirreversible effects on yield growth and overall crop development.  \nA preliminary assessment of the impact of the prevailing drought has been made as \nfollows, and I will circulate the relevant document – \n• \nThe revenue of planters is expected to decrease by Rs718,512,000. A committee \nhas been established at the Irrigation Authority, comprising various stakeholders, \nincluding Mauritius Cane Industry Authority, the Food and Agricultural Research \nExtension Institute, the Small Farmers Welfare Fund and leader planters from the \nregion. This committee is tasked with assessing the impacts of the drought and \nproposing effective mitigation strategies.  \n• \nThe Sugar Insurance Fund Board and Small Farmers Welfare Fund shall be \nconsulted on the way forward for compensation to small planters. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (b) of the question, my Ministry has, in response to \nthese challenges, come up with several immediate and transitionary support measures aimed \nat assisting planters in navigating through this difficult period until the detailed assessment – \nI will highlight them – just to give relief to the planters. \nIn order to alleviate the financial burden on affected planters, my Ministry has decided \nto forego the collection of irrigation dues, totalling some Rs10 m. from sugar cane planters \nimpacted by these restrictions for the Fiscal Year 2024-2025. Furthermore, as part of next \nyear’s budgetary proposal, my Ministry is advocating for financial assistance package. In \nrespect of one specific area, Rs3.5 m. has been earmarked to support small sugar cane \nplanters in replanting their fields at Pointe aux Piments.  \nThe Irrigation Authority has started a project in order to replace its pivot system with \ndrip system which allow for more efficient use of available and scarce water resources. \nRecognising that the cost of drip irrigation equipment poses a significant financial challenge \nfor small planters, we are offering financial assistance of Rs50,000 per arpent to facilitate the \npurchase of drip irrigation system by small sugarcane planters. Also, the strategies which will \nbe adopted in order to mitigate the effect of the annually recurring drought will consist of the \nfollowing – \n\n56 \n \na) \nconstruction of retention basins, mini dams along rivers so as to store water for \nirrigation; \nb) \nconstruction of water harvesting infrastructure and storage basin in agricultural \nareas; \nc) \nshifting towards more water efficient irrigation methods such as drip irrigation in \ncontrast to overhead irrigation and if need be, we will make use of drones to \nensure that there is efficient use of water and fertilisers; \nd) \npromotion of a cultivation of drought-resistant crop varieties that are better suited \nto our changing climatic condition; \ne) \ntraining and support to planters on adoption of water efficient and climate smart \nagricultural practices. \nAll these measures shall be discussed in detailed in the forthcoming Assises de l’Agriculture. \nMadam Speaker, the rainfall pattern over the past years and the consequential water \nsupply regime appears to be establishing a new normal necessitating a comprehensive \nreassessment of our medium and long-term agricultural and irrigation strategies for the \nnorthern plane. With the collaboration of the Ministry of Energy and Public Utilities, we are \nexploring the development of new water resources to ensure the sustainability of our \nagricultural sector. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes, Mr Rookny. \nMr Rookny: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I gather from information provided by the \nhon. Minister that some 3,000 planters of the north have seen their revenues depleted by \nsome Rs17 m. which effectively means they have been asphyxiated and which also means \nthat it will cause them significant difficulty to restart their activities once we have adequate \nwater. Will the hon. Minister advise if consideration will be given to compensate these \nplanters in order to allow them to put food on our tables? Thank you. \nDr. Boolell: They are already being given accompanying measures but I grant you, it is \na tough situation due to the vagaries of climatic condition but in the light of on-going pre-\nbudgetary discussions, you can rest assured we will do our level best to respond to the needs \nof this afflicting community. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Your next question! \n\n57 \n \nDRUG ADDICTS – REHABILITATION PROTOCOLS & TREATMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/376",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 376,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/376) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the rehabilitation of drug addicts, \nhe will state the – \n(a)  protocols put in place therefor, indicating the treatments administered; \n(b)  amount of funds spent by Government on such programs over the past three \nyears, indicating if any survey has been carried out to assess the effectiveness \nthereof, and  \n(c)  number of drug addicts salvaged from this scourge over the past ten years, \nindicating the number of cases of overdose recorded due to drug abuse.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the protocols put in place for various \nprogrammes run by the Harm Reduction Unit with the ‘Protocoles de Prise en Charge de \nl'Usage de Drogues à Maurice’ which has been validated in March 2023. The protocol has \nbeen designed to ensure consistent and effective patient care. It defines the diagnostic \nprocedure treatment guideline, patient management, safety measures and ethical \nconsiderations. These relate to drug users who consume illicit substances, including heroin, \nsynthetic drugs, cannabis and cocaine.  \nThe medical treatment of heroin addiction typically involves a combination on \nMedication Assisted Treatment (MAT). It uses medication to alleviate withdrawal symptoms, \nreduce cravings and prevent relapse. The most common medications used include methadone, \nbuprenorphine, naltrexone and naloxone. Synthetic drugs also known as New Psychoactive \nSubstance (NPS) are a diverse and rapidly changing group of substances. This makes it \ndifficult to develop specific medications to counteract their effects. The effects of synthetic \ndrugs can be unpredictable and vary widely depending on the specific substance and the \nindividual using it.  \nThere are generally no specific medications to reverse the effects of most synthetic \ndrugs. Treatments focuses on managing the acute symptoms, settle agitation, psychosis and \nseizures. Cocaine is a highly addictive stimulant and there are currently no FDA approved \nmedications specifically for cocaine addiction. While cannabis is often considered less \naddictive than other substances, chronic use can lead to cannabis use disorder. There are \ncurrently no FDA approved medications specifically for cannabis addiction. It is essential to \n\n58 \n \naddress that any co-occurring mental health disorders in addicts can significantly impact \nsubstance use.  \nThe protocol focuses on the phyco-social support and rehabilitation aspect for people \nwho use drug. These constitute vital components of effective drug addiction. Drug addiction \nis not simply a physical dependence, it is a complex condition that affects an individual’s \nbrain chemistry, emotional well-being, social relationship and overall life functioning. \nTherefore, treatment must address all these factors, not just the physical aspect of withdrawal. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that the amount \nof funds spent over the past three years for Methadone Substitution Therapy Programme is \naround Rs165 m. From the end of 2021 to May 2022, the National Audit Office conducted a \nperformance audit on enhancing the effectiveness of intervention related to drug demand and \nharm reduction. The NAO also carried out a performance audit at the levels of National Drug \nSecretariat, Ministry of Health and Wellness, and other stakeholders including non-\ngovernmental organisations involved in the fight against drug use. The Audit focused mainly \non the following – \n• \nadequation and effectiveness of drug use prevention activities; \n• \nadequation effectiveness of drug use disorder treatment rehabilitation, and social \nintegration activities, and  \n• \nadequate coverage and effectiveness of harm reduction intervention. \nThe recommendations of the NAO are being implemented by the Harm Reduction Unit. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (c) of the question, in June 2016, 4,591 drug \naddicts were on their Methadone Substitution Therapy Programme. In February 2025, the \nnumber increased to 8,851. It is accepted worldwide that the assessment of recovery from \ndrug addiction is inherently complexed, moving to the multi-facilitated nature of addiction \nitself. In essence, the complexity of assessing drug addiction recovery system from \nmultidimensional factors such as individual variability and the dynamic nature of the \nrecovery process itself amongst others. This accounts as to why the exact number of drug \naddicts salvage cannot be assessed precisely. \n\n59 \n \nMadam Speaker, it is to be noted that figures are available only for deaths due to \noverdose. In 2019, 43 deaths due to overdose were recorded. In 2020, there were 40 deaths. \nIn 2021, 50 deaths. In 2022, 41 deaths. In 2023, 39 deaths and for 2024 to June, 17 deaths. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes! \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, from the information provided by the hon. Minister, I \nheard the number of overdoses recorded. How will he reconcile the number of overdoses \nrecorded compared with the death certificates that are produced where this is never \nmentioned as overdose, it is mentioned as consequence of taking drugs? \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, as I have just mentioned it is very difficult also at times \nfor the doctor to certify the death has occurred as to what reason and I would request the hon. \nMember to be patient, a Bill will be debated today and all the details… \nMadam Speaker: Exactly! \nMr Bachoo: … the consequences as well as the results will be found there. \nMadam Speaker: It’s a good day for discussing drugs today. Thank you, hon. \nMinister!  \nNext question, Mr Lobine, First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix! \nPBAT – HEADMASTER & DEPUTY HEADMASTER CASE – RETIRED \nOFFICERS – PENSION BENEFITS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/377",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 377,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/377) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to cases referred to the Public \nBodies Appeal Tribunal regarding the appointment of officers to the grades of Headmaster \nand Deputy Headmaster since 2019 to 2021 and after the final determination of the Tribunal \nconfirming their substantive appointment, he will state if a High Powered Committee was set \nup to that effect and, if so, indicate the recommendations made by the Committee regarding \npayment of gratuity and pension benefits for all those officers who retired before the final \ndetermination of the Tribunal.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the offer of appointment to the \ngrade of Headmaster in a temporary capacity for a period of six months was made to 260 \nofficers in eight different batches, starting on 16 December 2019. \n\n60 \n \nThese concerned the appointment of officers to the grade of Headmaster only and they \ncould not be appointed in a substantive capacity on completion of their six months temporary \nperiod as four appeals were lodged before the Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal against the \ndecision of the Public Service Commission regarding their appointment.  \nYou may wish to note that on 07 July, 14 and 19 December 2022, my Ministry was \ninformed that the Tribunal had given its ruling whereby the four appeals lodged were all set \naside on 08 June, 03 and 11 November 2022.  \n Madam Speaker, subsequent to consultation with the then Ministry of Public Service, \nAdministrative and Institutional Reforms, my Ministry was informed that the matter was not \nreferred to the High-Powered Committee per se, but was rather dealt with in accordance with \nprevailing policies applicable in the public service and a precedent decision taken by the \nHigh-Powered Committee in a similar case. On 21 December 2021, the then Ministry of \nPublic Service, Administrative and Institutional Reforms issued Circular Note No. 66 of \n2021.  \nMadam Speaker, I am tabling a copy of the Circular Note No. 66 of 2021, containing \nthe recommendations of the High-Powered Committee on precedent cases. It must be \nhighlighted that the Circular Note makes reference to one main recommendation made by the \nHigh-Powered Committee at its meeting of 15 November 2021 whereby the retiring benefits \nof officers appointed in a temporary capacity and who have retired since 01 January 2016, \nthat is, the implementation date of PRB Report 2016, on attaining the compulsory age limit \nand whose cases are still pending before the PBAT or Supreme Court, be calculated on the \nsalary they would have drawn had they been appointed in a substantive capacity in the higher \ngrade at the time of retirement, provided they had served for at least two years in the \ntemporary capacity. However, following representations from aggrieved Headmasters who \nhad not been not been paid their retiring benefits, the then Ministry of Public Service, \nAdministrative and Institutional Reforms was consulted anew on the duration of their \ntemporary appointment that is, whether it should be six months or two years.  \nOn 13 November 2023, the then Ministry of Public Service, Administrative and \nInstitutional Reforms advised my Ministry that officers who were promoted Headmasters in a \ntemporary capacity for more than six months and who would not have required any additional \nqualification for the substantive appointment, would be eligible for the retiring benefits on the \n\n61 \n \nsalary attached to the post of Headmaster as they fell between the ambit of both Paragraph \n13.20 and 13.40 of the PRB Report 2021 and the advice of the Attorney General’s Office.  \nMy Ministry acted on that basis and 56 out of 68 Headmasters were eligible for \npayment of gratuity and pension benefits have already been paid. As regards, the remaining \n12 eligible Headmasters, the Account General’s Office has already been requested to effect \npayment. \nThank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Thank you very much. Are you happy? \nYes, the hon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet! \nREGIONAL CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE – OVERSEAS MISSIONS – COST \nINCURRED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/378",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 378,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/378) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the overseas \nmissions undertaken by the staff of the Regional Centre of Excellence during the period \nJanuary 2019 to December 2024, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCentre, information as to the number thereof, indicating in each case – \n(a) \nthe costs incurred therefor  \n(b)  if same were undertaken jointly with other Ministries or designated delegates, and \n(c) \ntable copy of the report on the outcomes thereof.",
      "answer": "Dr. Mrs Jeetun: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Financial Services \nCommission that during the period January 2019 to December 2024, six overseas missions, \nnamely to France twice, Belgium, Brazil, Japan, and Isle of Man and UK were undertaken by \nthe officers of the FSC Regional Centre of Excellence. \nOut of the six missions, five were undertaken by the head of the Regional Centre of \nExcellence, Mrs K.R.H. In one of the missions, in Isle of Man and UK, organised by the \nSmall Countries Financial Management Centre, she was accompanied by the Senior Manager \nHuman Resources of the FSC, Mrs S.P.B. This mission was funded by the organiser. In \nanother mission to Brazil, she was accompanied by the analyst, Mrs Z.I. and one mission in \nFrance was attended by an analyst, Mrs N.S. \n\n62 \n \nMadam Speaker, regarding part (a) of the question, the cost of the five missions \namounted to Rs935,943. As for the mission to Isle of Man and UK, as I said, it was fully \nfunded by the organiser. \nI am tabling a list of the overseas missions undertaken and the cost incurred for each of \nthem.  \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the FSC that the missions \nwere not jointly undertaken with other Ministries. As for my Ministry, according to records, \nno officers have attended those missions. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (c) of the question, a report on the outcome of \nthose missions is being tabled. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister! Yes, Mr Rookny! \nMr Rookny: Could the Minister therefore confirm that the head of the RCE did not \naccompany the former Minister of Finance on any of these missions? \nDr. Mrs Jeetun: I will need to look into that. This is the information that I have so far \nand it does not say whether she accompanied the Minister of Finance. She has attended six \noverseas missions and all of them were either herself or with the persons I have mentioned. \nThis is the information that I have been given by the FSC. Thank you.  \nMadam Speaker: You will let us know in due course. Yes? \nMr Beechook: Can the hon. Minister please inform the House whether the per diem of \nthe head of the RCE was generously increased beyond the rates applicable to the FSC staff \nupon the special request of the former CEO of the FSC? \nDr. Mrs Jeetun: I do not have that specific information at this point in time but I will \nlook for it, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Looks as if you will have to look for quite a lot from what I can see.  \nOkay hon. Members. Are you happy, for the moment? \nMr Beechook: No! \nMadam Speaker: You are not happy? \nMr Rookny: No! \n\n63 \n \nMadam Speaker: How can we make you happy? Honestly! Let’s wait for the Minister \nto come with more information in due course.  \nDr. Mrs Jeetun: I will table that information, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Don’t be in a rush to be happy! Where are we now? \nYes! Hon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \nRIVIERE DES ANGUILLES TRAFFIC CENTRE – PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION – \nSCOPE OF WORKS & PROJECT COST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/379",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 379,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/379) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the proposed \nconstruction of the Rivière des Anguilles Traffic Centre, he will state – \n(a) \nthe scope of works and estimated cost thereof; \n(b) \nthe expected date of coming into operation thereof, and  \n(c) \nthe bus routes that the Traffic Centre will serve, and  \n(d) \nif a feasibility assessment was made prior to embarking on the project.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Traffic Management \nand Road Safety Unit of my Ministry that the Rivière des Anguilles Traffic Centre Project \nthat seeks to facilitate the commuting of inhabitants to the Market Fair, the Rivière des \nAnguilles SSS, found nearby and existing residential Morcellement development and future \nproposed developments such as Smart City, a shopping mall in the vicinity of the new station.  \nWith regards to part (a) of the question, I am informed that the traffic centre covers an \narea of 6453 square metres constructed over a plot of land of 8900 square metres and \ncomprising the following – \n1. \nConstruction of five concrete boarding platforms; \n2. \nConstruction of one concrete alighting platform; \n3. \nInstallation of five smart bus shelters; \n4. \nConstruction of concrete footpath; \n5. \nConstruction of nine bus parking areas; \n6. \nConstruction of drains and absorption pit; \n\n64 \n \n7. \nAsphalt work; \n8. \nProvision of street lighting; \n9. \nProvision of traffic signs and road markings, and  \n10. \nConstruction of a green space and landscaping.  \nMadam Speaker, the works began on 26 September 2024, that is before the General Elections \nand have been completed recently on 15 March for an amount of Rs24,593,622 inclusive of \nVAT. \nMadam Speaker with regard part (b) of the question, I am informed that the bus station \nis expected to start operation in and around mid of May 2025 – next month. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (c) of the question, I am informed by the NLTA that \nbuses of Route No. 10, that is, Mahebourg to Rivière des Galets; Route No. 61A - Curepipe \nto Benares, and Route No. 6 - Curepipe to Rivière des Anguilles, will operate through the \nRivière des Anguilles Traffic Centre. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister.  \nMr Osman Mahomed: Sorry, there is one missing part here!  \nAs regards part (d) of the question, I am informed by TMRSU that for such type of \nprojects, no feasibility study is conducted – I was quite surprised as well – save for \ngeotechnical investigation, which actually should form part of the feasibility study. However, \nconsultations and several site visits with Village Councillors and the NLTA were effected to \nfind the best suitable land for the project. Prior to start of the works, however, soil \ninvestigation was carried out to ascertain the suitability of the site.  \nMadam Speaker, a traffic centre has been constructed next to the market fair close to \nthe Rivière des Anguilles SSS, like I said earlier, and the existing residential morcellement \ndevelopment. Moreover, the traffic centre will also facilitate commuting to the future \ndevelopments, such as the Smart City and shopping malls already planned in and around the \nvicinity thereof. \nMadam Speaker: That is it? No more? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes, that is it! Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Jhummun! \n\n65 \n \nMr Jhummun: Madam Speaker, since no feasibility analysis/assessment has been \nmade prior to the project, I am afraid to say that this project is likely to have the same fate as \nthe Camp Diable Traffic Centre where it is almost underutilised. Can the hon. Minister take \nthis matter with all those concerned to try and see how to reengineer and divert some routes \nso that this traffic centre is used to its maximum capacity. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes. As matters stand, we will only know whether the project is \nfeasible and not be a ghost town only when operations start. But if it warrants those other \nroutes be channelled over there so that it becomes buoyant with activities, we will do it. \nHowever, the proposed developments that were announced, the Smart City and the shopping \ncentre, if they are implemented, I think this will enhance the value of this huge investment. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \nGOVERNMENT MOBILE APPS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/380",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 380,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/380) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation \nwhether, in regard to the Mobile Applications “MoKloud”, “MauPass”, “Mo Rendez Vous” \nand “Mwa Mo Wallet”, he will state if consideration will be given for all the services and \nfacilities thereunder to be made accessible under a single Mobile App.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: Madam Speaker, I would like to thank the hon. Member for the \nquestion. With regard to the apps, it seems there has been an explosion of mobile apps in the \nway it has been implemented. In the journey towards building a digitally empowered and \ninclusive society, Madam Speaker, ministries, departments and parastatal bodies have around \n40 mobile apps.  \nHowever, these applications were not done in a cohesive manner and the approach was \nnot holistic. The Ministry has been characterised by a series of lack of fundamental principles \nof establishing a digital infrastructure. It would be unimaginable that today, a country like \nMauritius does not have a disaster recovery site for our main government data centre.  \nMadam Speaker, this implies that should the Atal Bihari Vajpayee building catch fire \nand the servers are down, all government services, including the parliamentary services, \nwould not be available to the public. This, to me, is a crime when it comes to what the public \nexpects us to do when we sit in Parliament! \n\n66 \n \nNow we know why the people responsible for doing it in the previous government did \nnot have the time to do it. They were queuing up in Burj Dubai for the discotheques! Now, \nMoKloud is one of the apps on which the question rests. So, it is good that I highlight to the \nHouse that MoKloud provides citizens with online access to official documents, such as birth \ncertificates and marriage certificates. So, citizens can apply for these certificates and they can \nstore it online in a secured manner. This is what MoKloud does. MoKloud is available today.  \nThere is another app on which the question has been asked, which is called MauPass. \nMauPass creates the bridge between the physical and the virtual world. It means that if I have \na mobile ID, this is my ID in the physical world. What is my ID in the virtual world so that \nthe government can endorse any claim that I make of being the person I am or I claim to be. \nTherefore, this is what Maupass does. It a critical application for our digital infrastructure.  \nIt is actually not surprising when we see the level of incompetence to state that \nMoKloud is deprived of a legal basis today. Now, this, again, is a matter that we are \naddressing with the Office of the Attorney General.  \nA third application is MoRendezVous. It is good for the Members of the House to know \nthat MoRendezVous allows citizens to plan meetings. It has been deployed for more than \nseven years. To date, there are only 5,000 users of MoRendezVous. That is good to know that \nthe users/department that use MoKloud the most is the Passport and Immigration Office. We \ncould have reduced the queues at the office for passport application processing, but we still \nsee the queues, which means that this app did not really meet its objectives! \nThe fourth one is Mwa Mo Wallet which enables citizens to store their digital \ndocuments again. This is applicable to Mauritius and all the outer islands. It is good to note \nthat all the users are suffering from a lack of features within these applications. And there are \nthree others, actually. \nSo, whenever there was a problem highlighted, the approach was: ‘okay, let us develop \nan app to address that problem.’ But that is not how we digitalise the country, Madam \nSpeaker! There has to be an approach, a strategy, a server, and data. We do not just sit in an \noffice in Ebène and we wake up and we say: ‘let us develop an app’!  \nApps like MoPri, MoBis, MoKouran, kiete sa ? All these apps, Madam Speaker, have \ncost money! It has cost taxpayer’s money! The worst of all is that it has cost us a lot of time. \nWhen we say that we have lost these ten sweet years in terms of digitalisation, when we \nrealise the impact of that loss, the impact on our government processes, the impact on the \n\n67 \n \nexpectations of Gen Z and Gen Alpha, it is big! It is really big because MoKouran and MoPri \nare not what our people expect.  \nOur people expect to have a super app which actually aggregates all the government \napplications. This is what they expect. This is what they deserve! This is what they pay their \ntaxes for! The former government has failed! And the Ministry of Information Technology, \nrepresented by the previous Minister for IT, has failed miserably! \nAn hon. Member: Laptop inn eklate ! \nDr. Ramtohul: ‘Eklate’ some people say!  \nMadam Speaker, there has been a low uptake of those users. Interestingly, it is a well-\nknown fact that we cannot manage what we do not measure. There has been no measurement \nof the users of those apps. The user-friendliness of those apps actually tells that the apps were \nnot really friendly to users! They were like an enemy to users, like do not use me! We \nmentioned the absence of the legal basis.  \nMadam Speaker, in the forthcoming blueprint for the ICT sector, priority has been set to \nactually rationalise all these applications into a single one so that it becomes a single window \nfor all citizens for ease of access. These apps will be user friendly. \nMy Ministry has already started working on a single unified app which will ensure a \nstreamlining of services, reduce redundancies, provide a standard interface, cater for multiple \nlanguages and provide for the use of Single Sign-On. So, with Maupass, you sign-in once, \nyou have access to a series of applications. The committee is a multi-stakeholder committee \nthat has been established within my Ministry together with the Central Informatics Bureau, \nMauritius Emerging Technologies Council and the Mauritius Digital Promotion Agency. \nThis is an ambitious and forward-looking project, Madam Speaker. We want to actually \ndevelop this in an efficient manner so that there is also a good uptake by the citizens. There \nwill be an accompanying communication campaign so that we advise and we sensitise the \npopulation around the advantages of using this app.  \nThe whole objective, Madam Speaker, as has been stipulated in our Government \nProgramme, is to move citizens from being in line to being online. Thank you, Madam \nSpeaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you so much, very interesting. Yes, Mr Caserne, you are okay \nwith that? Good! So, now we go to Ms Anquetil. \n\n68 \n \nJEUX INTER COLLÈGES – REINSTATEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/381",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 381,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/381) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether in regard to the Jeux Inter collèges, he will state the \nactions being taken by the Ministry and the Mauritius Secondary Schools Sports Association \nto restore same.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRÉSIDENCE PÈRE LAVAL MUNICIPAL COMPLEX – LEISURE ACTIVITIES – \nOPERATING HOURS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/382",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 382,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/382) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Résidence Père Laval \nMunicipal Complex, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Municipal Council \nof Quatre Bornes, information as to whether the complex is currently operational and, if so, \nindicate the – \n (a)  \ndifferent leisure activities being provided thereat, and \n (b)       opening and closing hours thereof and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, it is with much regret that I have to admit that the \nRésidence Père Laval Municipal Complex is hardly operational during weekdays and \nweekends. It should have been open during weekdays from 8.00hrs to 18.00hrs and on \nweekends from 14.00hrs up to 19.00hrs, respectively. Following the parliamentary question \nset by the hon. Member during the request for information stage, the Chief Executive of the \nMunicipal Council of Quatre Bornes informed that the complex was operational during \nweekdays and weekends, and it had all the amenities that facilitated the organisation of \nleisure activities for the citizens of the surrounding localities. \nHowever, during a site visit effected by the hon. Member, and subsequently, by officers \nof my Ministry, it was noted that the Municipal Complex and the indoor games were in a \nrundown is state. The following has been observed – \n(i) \nGround floor – hanging wires at several places, only one toilet operational \nand other toilets inaccessible because of having no handles. Painting \npeelings off of certain parts of the wall and play equipment not functional \nand are stacked in a corner. \n\n69 \n \n(ii) \nFirst floor – leaking roof, toilets blocks need repairs, fans not functioning, \nand painting peeling off. \nThe general impression is that the building is not being used by the public. My Ministry \nhas instructed the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes to refurbish the complex accordingly \nand to replace all the indoors games.  \nThe attention of the Chief Executive is being drawn to the fact that answers to \nParliamentary Questions should reflect the reality, and the sanctions that public officers are \nliable to, in case the august Assembly is misled by erroneous or false reply. \nI have also requested that disciplinary actions be initiated against officers of the \nMunicipal Council of Quatre Bornes who have failed in their duties of care by not performing \ntheir duty for which they are being paid. Having said the above, the multipurpose complex \ncomprises a social centre at the ground floor and hall on the first floor. Upon request the hall \ncan be rented for the organisation of wedding, reception, birthday celebration among others \nsubject to the payment of an appropriate fees. \nI am also of the view that the hall should be made available on Sundays and public \nholidays subject to the payment of an appropriate fee to enable the inhabitant to organise their \nactivities. I will request my Ministry to instruct the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes to \nsee to it that the Municipal Hall is available accordingly one it is refurbished. The \nrefurbishment is expected to be completed in some two months’ time. My Ministry will \nmonitor that the delay of the completion of refurbishing works is respected.  \nMadam Speaker, it is sad to say that the government and the service to the citizens are \nthe same at the level of some local authorities in the last few years have left much to be \ndesired due to the laissez-aller of some officers. The basic rights for leisure of the people, \nthat is, the citizen have not been respected and they have not been provided with quality \nservice due to some partisan councillors. Madam Speaker, it is my firm intention to redress \nthis situation. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Ms Anquetil. \nMs Anquetil : Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Madame la présidente, je \nsouhaite… \nMadam Speaker: Ne criez pas! \nMs Anquetil: Je ne crie pas. \nMadam Speaker: Non, non c’est un peu fort. \n\n70 \n \nMs Anquetil: Madame la présidente, je souhaite exprimer ma reconnaissance au \nministre pour les mesures rapides qu’il a prises en réponse à la situation déplorable au \ncomplexe municipal de Résidence Père Laval. Le Ministre peut-il informer la Chambre si une \nrévision de la programmation des activités est envisagée en vue de redonner vie à ce \ncomplexe et répondre aux aspirations clairement exprimées par les habitants de Résidence \nPère Laval. Merci. \nMadam Speaker : Le Ministre a déjà répondu. Il y a les élections municipales avec, \nj’espère, de nouveaux élus qui vont, aussi j’espère, faire leur travail. Je ne pense pas que le \nministre peut répondre plus. Je passe à la nouvelle question. Alors, M. Quirin ! \nPRIMARY SCHOOLS – KREOL MORISIEN EDUCATORS – WORKING \nCONDITIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025",
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/383",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 383,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/383) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nMinister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the Kreol Morisien \nEducators in primary schools, he will state the measures being envisaged to address the \ndisparities in working conditions thereof compared to other primary educators, particularly \nregarding working period, pupil-educator ratio and resources made available thereto and, if \nnot, why not.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: I have been informed that currently there are disparities in the \nworking conditions of Kreol Morisien Educators in primary schools. Particularly regarding \nthe number working periods, pupil-teacher ratio and available resources.  \nIn terms of working periods, Kreol Morisien Educators like those teaching Asian \nlanguages, are required to work up to 58 periods per week and ensuring that there is no \ndisparity in this regard. Regarding the pupil-teacher ratio, the standard class size is set at 40 \npupils. However, depending on the region and the number of pupils enrolled in KM, the ratio \ncan range from 1:1 to 1:47 per class. If the ratio exceeds 30, additional support is provided by \neither another Kreol Morisien Educator or a supply teacher to ensure that the teaching \nenvironment remains conducive to quality education. \nMeasures to address the situation, Madam Speaker, the recruitment of additional \neducators is underway including the 51 trainees recruited in 2022 of whom 18 have \nsuccessfully completed their training at MIE. Further, 31 more trainees were recruited in \n2024 and are expected to complete their training by 2026. Additionally, supply Kreol \nMorisien teachers will be engaged for the year 2025 and recruitment procedures for these \n\n71 \n \nteachers will commence shortly with the recent constitution of the PSC Board. My Ministry \nis committed to ensuring that the set norms and standards are complied with through ongoing \nrecruitment and the mobilisation of supply teachers in the future. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Mr Quirin! \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. Bien que le Kreol Morisien ait été introduit \ndans les écoles primaires depuis 2012, aucun Deputy Head Teacher ni inspecteur d’école \nspécialisé en Kreol Morisien n’a encore était nommé pour assurer un encadrement \npédagogique approprié. À quand, M. le ministre pouvons-nous nous attendre un changement \ndans le bon sens ? \nDr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, that is why we have this change. This has not \nbeen happening, rightly said by the hon. Member, and this is something we are going to \naddress. Whatever was not done properly by the previous government, we are here in order to \naddress that issue. \nMr Quirin :  Madame la présidente, je pense que l’honorable ministre a dû l’affirmer \ndans sa réponse initiale, contrairement aux enseignants de General Purpose, d’informatique \nou de langue asiatique, les enseignants de Kreol Morisien ne disposent pas, dans certaines \nécoles, de salle dédiée pour l’enseignement. Donc cela paraît comme une discrimination et \nque compte faire justement l’honorable ministre pour y remédier ? \nDr. Gungapersad: Definitely, this also will have to be addressed because we do not \nwant any streak of discrimination to exist in whatsoever school, hon. Member. Thank you, \nMadam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: It would be unconstitutional. Thank you, Minister. \nHon. First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix. Mr Lobine! The hon. Minister of \nIndustry, SME and Cooperatives will be replying this question. \nAFRICA GROWTH AND OPPORTUNITY ACT – EXPIRY – ECONOMIC IMPACT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/384",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 384,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade",
      "question": "(No. B/384) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade whether, in regard \nto the Africa Growth and Opportunity Act, he will state – \n(a) \nif his Ministry has undertaken any assessment of the potential economic \nimpact of the expiry thereof in September 2025, and \n\n72 \n \n(b) \nthe measures being implemented and/or envisaged to safeguard the export \nsector, particularly the textiles and other key industries.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives (Mr A. Ameer Meea): Thank \nyou, Madam Speaker. I would like to thank the hon. Member for this PQ as this will give me \nthe opportunity to shed some light on AGOA and the issue of US Reciprocal Tariff.  \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the House that \nAfrican Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) which became effective in May 2000 has been \na lifeline for our industry operators to make inroads into the US market through duty free and \nquota free access for some 6,400 product lines. I wish to remind the House that the initial \ndiscussions on the Mauritian side around the establishment of AGOA were held in the late \n1990’s under the leadership of Dr. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, our current Prime Minister.  \nThe AGOA was last renewed in 2015 for a period of 10 years and is therefore due to \nexpire in September 2025. I am informed that prior to its expiry, Government authorities took \nthe necessary steps to initiate discussions with the US counterparts to forcefully lobby for an \nearly renewal of AGOA in an endeavour for our exporters to have more visibility on the US \nmarket. There was a general indication that AGOA was set to be renewed for an additional 16 \nperiods, up to 2041 following the AGOA Renewal and Improvement Bill that was introduced \nin the US Senate in April 2024. \nAs the House is aware, on 02 April 2025, the US President came forward with an \nexecutive order to impose a reciprocal tariff of 40% on imports from Mauritius. I wish to \ninform the House that on 07 April 2025, the Prime Minister chaired a meeting in the presence \nof the Minister of Foreign Affairs, myself as Minister of Industry and the Junior Minister of \nFinance, also the Ag. Financial Secretary, the Economic Advisors at the Prime Minister’s \nOffice to take stock of the situation and decide on the way forward. \nThereafter, on 08 April 2025, the Prime Minister made a statement in the House, \nwhereby he highlighted the importance of AGOA for Mauritius and the impact on the \nreciprocal tariff on our exports. He also outlined the course of action that would be followed \nby Mauritius to safeguard the interests of the export manufacturing industry. The Prime \nMinister also informed the House that he is writing to President Trump with a view to discuss \nthe concerns of Mauritius. \nConsequently, on 09 April 2025, the US Government announced a 19-day pause on the \nnew tariff and a lowering of the reciprocal tariff rate at 10% effective immediately. I should \n\n73 \n \nemphasise that with the coming into force of this US trade policy, the advantages enjoyed by \nour industry operators under AGOA would cease to exist. I should apprise the House that \nUSA is our fourth export market destination for locally manufactured products such as \nwearing apparel, live primates, jewellery, fish, fish preparations, medical devices and optical \ngoods amongst others. \nAs a matter of fact, domestic export to the USA stood at Rs6.8 billion in 2024, with 79 \nenterprises exporting to this market. Out of them, there were 41 export-oriented enterprises \nexporting to this market. Out of them, there were 41 export-oriented enterprises exporting to \nthe US market to the tune of Rs5.7 billion. And out of these 41 export-oriented enterprises, 11 \nderived more than 50% of their export revenue from USA. Altogether, these 41 enterprises \nemploy around 21,000 workers, out of whom 10,000 are Mauritians.  \nIn the wake of the event of the recent imposition of reciprocal tariffs by the US \nGovernment, I wish to inform the House that my Ministry conducted a quick survey from 07 \nto 10 April 2025 among the 41 export-oriented enterprises exporting to the USA, to assess its \npotential impact on their business operations. Most of these enterprises surveyed have \nindicated that – \n(a) \nThey have contacted their clients in the USA who are awaiting clarifications on \nthe reciprocal tariffs’ applications by the US custom operatives to decide on the \nway forward. \n(b) \nThere is a sense of uncertainty amongst some clients who have put their orders on \nhold. \n(c) \nAt this stage, it is still premature to assess the full cost implications and spillover \neffects on the new tariffs imposed on them, particularly if US clients proceed with \ncancellation of orders in the coming months, and \n(d) \nThey are envisaging to explore new market destinations, thus this process will \ntake time to materialise. Furthermore, the Prime Minister will be chairing a \nfollow-up meeting tomorrow 16 April 2025 to have latest updates on the matter \nand to decide accordingly on the next course of action. \nMadam Speaker, with respect to part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House \nthat the export manufacturing sector is already being supported through a host of measures, \namong which – \n(a) \nReduce corporate tax for 3% on profits derived from exports of goods; \n\n74 \n \n(b) \nFlexible work permit policies whereby there is no ratio, no quota for export-\noriented enterprises; \n(c) \nProvision of a refund of 60% on basic air freight cost incurred on exports for all \nproducts to the USA under market destination under the Trade Promotion and \nMarketing Scheme; \n(d) \nProvision of a grant of 25% of the basic ocean freight cost up to a maximum of \nUSD 600 per 40 feet container exported to 47 eligible ports in Africa through the \nFreight Rebate Scheme; \n(e) \nProvision of a 50% subsidy on the Export Trading Guarantee Insurance Premium \nincurred by enterprises when they subscribe to an insurance policy to cover their \nexports to all countries under the Export Trading Guarantee Insurance Scheme; \n(f) \nProvision for a subsidy on the rental and administrative cost of warehouses \noperated by Mauritian companies in Tanzania, Kenya through the African \nWarehousing Scheme, and \n(g) \nA refund of Rs500,000 annually for the SMEs participating in international fares \nunder the SME Refund Scheme. \nMadam Speaker, it has been a long-time policy of my Ministry to move towards \nrebalancing our exports, so as to cushion against setbacks in any one of our traditional \nmarkets, including the USA. In this vein, we consider that Africa holds promising potential \nfor our industry operators, in view of the fact that the AfCFTA, SADC and COMESA \nFreetrade Agreements have opened up the gateway for a more diversified market base. \nFurthermore, there is a need to consolidate and expand market outreach in Europe and also \ntap new opportunities in economies having high purchasing power such as the UAE, \nAustralia and Japan. \nTo conclude, Madam Speaker, my Ministry will coordinate efforts with relevant \ninstitutions to urgently elaborate an action plan backed by significant financial and human \nresources to aggressively conduct targeted export promotion campaigns in these high \npotential economies, by leveraging on free trade agreements wherever applicable, which was \nunfortunately not being performed by the Economic Development Board during the last ten \nyears. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much. Yes? \nMr Lobine: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister whether \nGovernment will envisage appointing a foreign consultant or a lobbyist in the United States \n\n75 \n \nto help the Mauritian Government with regards to future negotiations with the US or in the \naftermath of the 90 days of President Trump? \nMr Ameer Meea: Yes, Madam Speaker, we already have a lobbyist doing this job and \nwe have a panel of experts working on this issue under the leadership of the Prime Minister.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Thank you so much.  \nHon. Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien! \nBASALT LTD, PLAINE MAGNIEN – LANDS & RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES – \nCONSTRUCTION PERMITS GRANT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/385",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 385,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/385) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the lands and residential \nproperties situated in the vicinity of Basalt Ltd., at Plaine Magnien, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the District Council of Grand Port, information as to the reasons why \nconstruction permits are not being granted to build additional floors on existing houses \nthereat, indicating the remedial measures, if any, being proposed thereon.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, can I table this PQ because it is too long? \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Woochit: The answer is too long. \nMadam Speaker: That would be perfect. \n(Interruptions) \nThat would be perfect. \nMr Woochit: No, it is too long. \nMadam Speaker: Because we really want to move on a bit. So, please table it, do not \nhesitate. Thank you. Mr Apollon, is that alright? Can we deal with this? \nMr Apollon: It is okay.  \nMadam Speaker: Then we will come back. \nMr Apollon: No problem! \n\n76 \n \nMadam Speaker: You got plenty of time! Next week, the week after, you know. Hon. \nSecond Member for Grand Baie and Poudre D'or, Mr Beejan! \nBEAU PLATEAU, GOODLANDS – NETWORK COVERAGE – IMPROVEMENT \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/386",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 386,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/386) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre D'or) asked \nthe Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in regard to \nthe mobile and internet network coverage in the region of Beau Plateau, Goodlands, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the measures being envisaged to \nimprove same, giving details thereof and the expected start and completion dates of the \nproposed measures.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Member for the question.  \nI am informed that the region of Beau Plateau in Goodlands is developing and, at \npresent, still sparsely populated. There are three licensed operators, Cellplus Mobile \nCommunications Ltd, which is a subsidiary of Mauritius Telecom, Emtel Ltd and Mahanagar \nTelephone (Mauritius) Limited, also known as MTML. They cover the aforementioned \nregion with 2G, 3G and 4G from their base stations which are located in the vicinity of \nGoodlands. Additionally, Cellplus and Emtel provide 5G and 4G+ coverage within the same \nregion.  \nEmtel and MTML have indicated that they have not received any complaints from the \ninhabitants and users within that region. However, Cellplus Mobile Communications Ltd has \nconfirmed that it has received two complaints from the same customer: one on 02 July 2024 \nand another on 21 March 2025. Accordingly, taking into consideration residential density and \nsubject to necessary approvals from the relevant authorities, Cellplus will proceed to identify \nan appropriate location for a mobile site.  \nA typically new mobile site deployment will take around 12 months roughly. \nDepending upon the acquisition and the process, the speed at which the process is executed, \nincluding the Building and Land Use Permit along with a regulatory clearance, we are \nlooking at around 12 months. \nMadam Speaker, I would also like to add, also in relation to PQ B/221 during the \nSitting of 25 March, I informed the House that the Information and Communication \n\n77 \n \nTechnologies Authority (ICTA) is currently implementing, in collaboration with a French \nnetwork testing solution provider, nPerf, a quality-of-service measurement application that \nwill allow any subscriber to test its internet service subscription and to report the results to \nthe ICTA through the mobile application. What are we doing with this? We are actually \nempowering the end-users so that they can assess the quality of the network. In case they face \ndifficulties, they can, with evidence that is revealed on the mobile app, send their request to \nthe ICTA. Ultimately, ICTA will communicate with the service provider. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \n(Interruptions) \nIt seems to me that maybe there are some microphones which are louder than others. I \ndo not know. Maybe someone should look into this problem. \nAnyway, was that answer okay?  \nIl y en a beaucoup qui ont été withdrawn.  \nHon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet! \nFSC/OECD REGIONAL CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE – MANDATE & OVERSIGHT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/387",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 387,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/387) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the Financial \nServices \nCommission/Organisation \nfor \nEconomic \nCo-operation \nand \nDevelopment \n(FSC/OECD) Regional Centre of Excellence, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to the –  \n(a) \nbackground, objectives and mandate thereof;  \n(b) \nspecific achievements made under each of its objectives to date; \n(c) \nannual expenditure of the Centre, and  \n(d) \nkey performance indicators put in place to ensure that public funds are utilized \nefficiently, and  \n\n78 \n \n(e) \nterm/duration of the Memorandum of Understanding between the FSC/OECD.",
      "answer": "Dr. Mrs Jeetun: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed by the FSC that the Regional Centre of Excellence (RCE) was established in March \n2019 following an MoU signed between the Government of Mauritius and the OECD in \nSeptember 2018. The RCE operates under a governing board which advises on strategies and \nactions to be adopted.  \nThe objectives and mandate of the RCE are – \n(i) \nto deliver capacity building programmes aimed primarily at the financial \nservices regulators and law enforcement agencies from the Southern and \nEastern African region; \n(ii) \nresearch topical areas relevant to financial services and financial malpractices \nfor the regional market, and \n(iii) \nadvice on minimum standards as regards best practices, guidelines and \nprinciples that must be introduced at the regional level. \n \nThe RCE offers all its events free of charge. Mauritius is the only country in Africa, \nthrough the RCE, where the OECD has a dedicated framework of cooperation in respect of \nthe financial sector. \n \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the FSC \nthat the RCE has, as to date, carried out the following activities in accordance with its \nobjectives – \n(i) \nin terms of capacity building, it has carried 17 workshops in collaboration with \nthe OECD and one event with the CFA Society Mauritius. \n(ii) \nfrom November 2020 to June 2024, some 6,530 participants from \napproximately 113 countries have been trained.  \n(iii) \nin terms of trainers, 111 trainers delivered virtually and 81 trainers provided \ntraining in person. \n\n79 \n \nWith regard to the second objective of research and advice on policy, on the basis of the \nworkshops carried out, information gathered and research carried out, four publications have \nbeen issued in relation to the events hosted by the RCE – \n(i) \nthe blockchain adoption in Africa trends in market activity and policy \ndevelopment; \n(ii) \nopen finance in Africa and open banking in Sub-Saharan Africa; \n(iii) FinTech lending in Sub-Saharan Africa, and \n(iv) sustainable finance trends and development in Africa. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (c) of the question, I am informed by the FSC that \nthe annual expenditure of the RCE amounted to Rs8,691,146 and Rs6,719,505 for the years \n2023 and 2024, respectively. These were co-financed by the FSC and the Bank of Mauritius \nat 50% each. These excludes grant agreement signed with the OECD. The amount, I am told, \ncannot be divulged as it is part of a grant agreement between the OECD and the FSC. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (d) of the question, the RCE operates under \nstrategic oversight of its governing board which reviews and approves its activities and \nassociated costs. I am also informed by the FSC that the RCE’s budget is subject to a two-tier \napproval, namely by the RCE governing board and subsequently, by the FSC Board. Thus, \nensuring accountability.  \nIt is also important to note that the OECD has a strict budget reporting regime, internal \ncontrols and accountability mechanisms which are applicable to its financial management \nstructure and system, and ensure that the expenditure of public funds is transparent and \nrepresents value for money.  \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (e) of the question, I am informed by the FSC that \nthe MoU between the Government of Mauritius and OECD was signed in September 2018 \nfor an initial duration of two years. Thereafter, it has been extended in October 2020 for a \nduration of five years ending September 2025. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Mr Rookny! \n\n80 \n \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, can the Minister please confirm that the transparency \nrequiring OECD is now requiring secrecy about a grant given to FSC? \nMadam Speaker: It is the other way round, if I am not mistaken. The grant given by \nOECD to the FSC or the other way round? \nDr. Mrs Jeetun: From OECD to the FSC. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nDr. Mrs Jeetun: So, the grant is provided by the OECD to the FSC to finance partly \nthe operation of the research centre. But I have to get legal advice. I have been told that, \nlegally, we are not allowed to disclose the amount. \nMadam Speaker: Of the grant agreement. \nDr. Mrs Jeetun: Yes! \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Yes! \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, can the Minister advise if 17 workshops over the last six \nyears could be considered as meeting the objectives of the RCE? \nDr. Mrs Jeetun: I will need to come back on that, Madam Speaker. It is a judgment \nthat we will have to make on whether the sessions that have been held meet the objectives. \nMadam Speaker: Of course! \nDr. Mrs Jeetun: It is a judgment that we will have to make. \nMadam Speaker: Of course! Mr Rookny, is that enough? Are you happy this time?  \n(Interruptions) \nNow, Mr Caserne, hon. Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nRING ROAD PROJECT, PHASE 2 & 3 – IMPLEMENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/388",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 388,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/388) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to Phases 2 and 3 of \n\n81 \n \nthe Ring Road Project, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Road \nDevelopment Authority, information as to whether consideration will be given for the \nimplementation thereof and, if so, when and if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Road Development Authority that \nthe main objective of the Ring Road Project is to relieve traffic congestion in and around Port \nLouis as well as to improve connectivity between the city and the north, south and western \nparts of Mauritius.  \nIn fact, the first phase of the Ring Road Network which was completed in the year 2014 \nand which currently provides access to the Swami Vivekananda International Conference \nCentre and the surrounding areas, is only part of the major link of the Ring Road Project. The \ncomplete Ring Road Project comprises two additional phases as follows – \n1. \nPhase 2, extending over a length of around 4.7 km, will start at the Ring Road \nPhase 1 Project at Pailles, it will cross Quoin Bluff Mountain and Moneron Hill \nthrough two tunnels and will connect to the end of Boulevard Victoria and to \nTranquebar through a great separated junction; \n2. \nPhase 3, extending over a length of around 2.85 km, will start at Vallée Pitot and \nwill continue as a new route parallel to the Military Road connecting Nicolay \nRoad at Plaine Verte and Motorway M2 through an interchange between Quay D \nand Mer Rouge roundabout and will end at the port near the Container Park via a \ndedicated overpass. \nThe complete Ring Road forms part of the National Road Strategy Networks of the RDA \ndesigned to support the sustainable development of the island by providing safe and fast \nconnectivity addressing traffic congestion and allowing decentralisation. \nMadam Speaker, the Ring Road Phase 2 and 3 projects will require massive \ninvestments and in view of the budgetary constraints of Government, as elaborated in the \nState of the Economy Report, it is proposed to implement the projects in phases to be \nscheduled in the years to come. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. If I may, at this stage, we don’t have much time left, I \nhave got three questions, I would like you to help me to go through these three questions. \nThank you.  \n\n82 \n \nMs Anquetil, hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes! \nMUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF QUATRE BORNES – CURRENT FINANCIAL \nSITUATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/389",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 389,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/389) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether in regard to the Municipal Council of \nQuatre Bornes, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom information as to the \ncurrent financial situation thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, a request for funds for an amount of Rs553,882,752 \nwas made to the Ministry of Finance for Financial Year 2024-2025. This amount was \ncalculated on the basis of forecasted expenditure and forecasted revenue to be generated \nincluding contributions from Councils owned funds and probably efficiency gain. \nHowever, I am informed that for the Financial Year 2024-2025, the Municipal Council \nof Quatre Bornes was provided with a grant-in-aid of Rs344 m. only. As at 10 April 2025, it \nhas generated a revenue of Rs110,644,246 to date and the total revenue available to the \nCouncil stand at Rs454,644,246. It is noted that the Ministry of Finance anticipated that the \ncontribution from the Councils’ own fund for an amount of Rs25 m. and probably efficiency \ngain to the tune of Rs44,288,770, this never materialised. \nMadam Speaker, the Local Authorities Governance Unit of my Ministry undertakes a \nmid-term review of all local authorities including the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes in \nthe months of December and January every year.  \nDuring that exercise, the Council has informed that its revised expenditure stands at \nRs543,458,908 in view thereof based on actual as well as forecasted revenue and \nexpenditures. The forecast in budget deficit would be around Rs89 m. \nMadam Speaker, the deficit situation of the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes is a \nreflection of what is happening in other local authorities also. The result of inadequate \nfunding being provided by the Minister of Finance is that additional grant-in-aid for all local \nauthorities have to be sought in March each year. This demonstrates a clear lack of foresight \non the part of the former government which was more concerned in dilapidating public funds \nfor their own motives instead of addressing the real issues. Hon. Members must have read \nnow how the funds from the Mauritius Investment Corporation (MIC) have been diverted to \n\n83 \n \nunauthorised use. Had the same fund been injected in the local authorities, many projects, for \nthe common good of the citizens, could have been implemented.   \nMadam Speaker, I wish to reassure the House that the mid-term review exercise has \nalready been carried out and a request for additional grant-in-aid to the tune of Rs89 m. has \nbeen formulated in order to cater the current budget deficit and for the good running of the \nMunicipal Council of Quatre Bornes. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes! \nMs Anquetil: I thank the hon. Minister for his answer. Should we understand that the \nMunicipal Council of Quatre Bornes spent more than they were allowed? Did they get \napproval from your Ministry? Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Short and sweet. C’est direct ça! \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, in the Council we have for every expense, we have a \nvote and it is depending on the vote that they… \nMadam Speaker: Je connais très bien les municipalités, n’oubliez pas ! \nMr Woochit: Exactly, so all the expenses have been made according to the votes. So, \nwe can’t overspend on the same vote. \nMadam Speaker: No overspending! \nMr Woochit: Yes! \nMadam Speaker: You have another question, Ms Anquetil? \nMs Anquetil: No! \nMadam Speaker: No, okay. Next question, hon. Member for Rivière des Anguilles and \nSouillac! \nMAURITIUS & RODRIGUES - RISING COSTS OF COMMODITIES - NEW \nPOLICY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/390",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 390,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/390) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the \nproposed introduction of a new policy to address the issue of rising costs of commodities in \n\n84 \n \nboth mainland Mauritius and Rodrigues, he will state where matters stand, indicating if \nproposal will also be made for the protection of consumers against unfair practices.",
      "answer": "Mr Yeung Sik Yuen: Madam Speaker, my Ministry currently imposes price control on \n34 categories of essential commodities for Mauritius and out of which 12 commodities are \ncontrolled under the maximum fixed price mechanism which includes scheduled bread, LPG, \nmogas and gasoil and flour. In addition, there are 22 commodities comprising of more than \n24,000 products which are controlled under the maximum markup mechanism including milk \npowder, breakfast cereals, infant food, edible oil, pharmaceutical products and basmati rice. \nFor Rodrigues, there are 22 commodities which are now under maximum markup mechanism \nsuch as animal feed, edible oil, canned poultry, canned tuna and cheese among others. There \nare 14 commodities under maximum fixed price including fresh fish and garlics. \nMoreover, my Ministry is already providing relief to consumers through the provision \nof subsidised flour to consumers with a subsidy of Rs8.04 per half kg. Long grain white rice \nwith a subsidy of Rs8.30 per half kg and for a 12kg LPG cylinder, a subsidy of Rs386.68 is \nbeing granted. \nThe Government is already disbursing an estimated amount of Rs5 billion per year for \nthe maintenance of those subsidies in order to make the essential commodities affordable to \nthe vulnerable household both in Mauritius and Rodrigues. It is a fact that Mauritius is a \nhighly import dependent country and is highly affected to the disruption on the international \nmarkets and exposed to foreign exchange volatilities variation in supplier prices and changes \nin the freight cost. My Ministry has initiated a series of action to protect consumers against \nupside volatilities in prices and protect consumer interest. \nMadam Speaker, in order to ensure affordability and accessibility of essential \ncommodities, my Ministry has recently introduced maximum mark-up on frozen pack \nvegetables and canned vegetables and is currently working on extending maximum mark-up \non other essential frequently consumed commodities for both Mauritius and Rodrigues.  \nI also wish to inform the House that a proposed list of essential commodities is being \nfinalised for bulk importation at lower prices for which partnership with international \nsuppliers will be explored in order to increase access for all consumers and reduce \ninflationary pressures.  \n\n85 \n \nFurthermore, continuous market monitoring and analysis on the prices of essential \ncommodities on the market are ongoing at the level of my Ministry. The latest finding of such \nexercise revealed that following the intervention of the Bank of Mauritius in order to stabilise \nthe value of the rupee and to control inflation, the prices of several essential commodities are \nwitnessing stability and notable decreases in retail prices since the beginning of the year \n2025. These include products such as infant milk, baby food, processed cheese, pasta, \nbreakfast cereals, basmati rice, canned sardines and corned mutton.  \nMadam Speaker, as regards unfair practices, my Ministry has inspected around 3,000 \ntrade premises across the island since the beginning of the year including supermarkets, \nshops, pharmacies, bakeries, hardware shops, trade and market fairs among others and have \nissued 343 contraventions up to date.  \nFurthermore, the Consumer Protection (Fixed Penalty Notice) (Amendment) \nRegulations 2025 were promulgated to strengthen the enforcement of sanctions against unfair \ncommercial practices. Since their implementation on 31 March 2025, a total of 31 traders \nhave been issued fixed penalty notices in accordance with the revised fines.  \nMadam Speaker, additionally, in line with the measures announced in the Government \nProgramme 2025-2029, my Ministry is currently working on different legislation in order to – \na) \nprevent any unwarranted increase in price in times of emergencies and crisis and \nto prevent the holding of products for sale at higher prices in the future which is a \ncrucial step in creating a market place that is not only fair but also resilient in \ntimes of uncertainty, and \nb) \nprotect consumers from unscrupulous traders who have a tendency to increase \ntheir profit margin by reducing the size or weight of a product. This will enable \nconsumers to compare prices based on consistent units and as such empower \nconsumers with the information, they need to make informed purchasing decision \nwhile discouraging deceptive business practices, \nc) \nlast but certainly not the least, I am pleased to announce that the New Consumer \nProtection Bill has successfully completed its drafting stage with a view to \naddressing the evolving challenges in the market place. The Bil represents a \nsignificant step forward in strengthening consumers’ rights and enhancing \nprotection against unfair business practices.  \n\n86 \n \nThe Bill is expected to be presented to Cabinet soon and thereafter, it will be introduced \nin the National Assembly. The Bill represents a cornerstone of our broader consumer \nprotection agenda and once enacted, it will significantly enhance the confidence and security \nof consumers in our economy. \nThank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister!  \nHANDBALL – REVIVAL ACTIONS – NOV 2024-15 APRIL 2025",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/391",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 391,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/391) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to handball, he will state the actions \ntaken by his Ministry since November 2024 to date to revive same.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Mrs Savabaddy! Last question! \nPRIMARY SCHOOLS – KREOL MORISIEN – TEACHING CONSTRAINTS & \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/392",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 392,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/392) Mrs A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the \nKreol Morisien, he will state the number of primary schools where same – \n (a) is being taught, indicating \n(i)  \nthe number of teachers available therefor, and  \n(ii) \nif any shortage of these teachers has been reported at the Ministry, and  \n(b)  cannot be taught and the reasons therefor, indicating the measures being \nenvisaged to address this issue.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, with regard to part(a), first part of the question, I \nhave been informed that Kreol Morisien is currently being taught in 189 primary schools \ncomprising 143 public primary schools and 46 Roman Catholic Education Authority Primary \nSchools. To support the effective teaching of the subject, a total number of 229 educators are \navailable.  \nI am tabling the number of Kreol Morisien educators who are currently serving in \nprimary schools.  \n\n87 \n \nWith regard to part (a), second part of the question, I wish to inform the House that no \nshortage of Kreol Morisien educators has been reported to my Ministry to date. However, I \nam informed that six KM educators are currently serving two primary schools where the \npupil population studying KM is low. Pending the availability of supply teachers for the \nsubject, I referred to that issue earlier to the previous PQ.  \nAs regards part (b), there are 67 public primary schools where KM is not currently \ntaught or due to a lack of demand for the subject. However, due to the establishment of new \nresidential areas, eight of these schools have recently requested the introduction of KM. \nRegarding the last part of your question, I enlisted the measures in the previous \nquestion to hon. Quirin. \n Thank you.  \nCHILDREN - ONLINE EXPLOITATION & ABUSE - PROTECTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/393",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 393,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/393) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the \nprotection of children from online exploitation, harm and abuse, she will state the measures, \nprogrammes or mechanisms, if any, put in place therefor, indicating – \n (a) how the Ministry proposes to empower families on the negative impact of the \ndigital environment, and  \n(b)  the complaints mechanism, if any, put in place therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSAVANNE DISTRICT – SPORTS COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/394",
      "sitting_id": "15-april-2025",
      "date": "2025-04-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 394,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/394) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the promotion of \nsports and leisure, he will state if consideration will be given for the construction of a stadium \nand/or gymnasium with a running track in the District of Savanne.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Time is up! \nHon. Prime Minister! \n \n\n88 \n \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that all the business on today’s \nOrder Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nSTATEMENT BY MINISTER \nSUGAR INVESTMENT TRUST – ECONOMIC COLLAPSE \n(4.07 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries (Dr. \nA. Boolell): Madam Speaker, with your permission, I wish to make a Statement with regard \nto the Sugar Investment Trust (SIT).  \nThe Sugar Investment Trust is on the verge of an economic collapse. It is owned by \nsome 40,000 small planters who own 95% of a company. The remaining 5% shareholding is \nowned by Government.  \nThe Sugar Investment Trust has accumulated a debt of around Rs1.6 billion over the \nlast ten years. It is being driven by deficit at all levels and within all its clusters, inter alia, \nLand Holdings, Leisure, Property and Corporate Services. The Sugar Investment Trust is \ngenerating losses to the tune of Rs150 million annually and debt levels increasing by around \n10% annually.  \nThis recurring trend from the last ten years has led to a deterioration of the asset base of \nthe company coupled by a deep negative cash flow and a fragile balance sheet with all its \nassets encumbered with charges and pledges. Overdrafts are being employed to pay salaries \nand other auxiliary dues. \nThe previous management has been engaged in massive mismanagement and \ninaccurate reporting.  \nThe situation of the SIT is as follows – \n\n89 \n \n(i) \nIn 2014, the SIT’s share valuation stood at Rs15,000 per share and has since, \nbeen depleted of its value by more than 92 %. The net asset value per share has \nfallen to Rs1.78; \n(ii) \nThe SIT has pledged all remaining assets against debts; \n(iii) In 2014, the SIT had a land bank of 7,000 arpents and is today left only with \n2,100 arpents;  \n(iv) The sale of the land has been made with no benchmarking, no official valuations, \nand conducted in an unprofessional manner discounted by more than 40-60% \nbelow normal market rates; \n(v) \nIn many instances, related party individuals, that is, directors and other related \nentities have engaged with the SIT to purchase these discounted lands, never \nsettled accordingly, but continued to harvest sugarcane thereon; \n(vi) The proceeds of the above land sale have never been employed to repay \noutstanding liabilities, but rather to re-launch property projects with overstated \ncosts and understated selling rates; \n(vii) According to SBM, loans of the SIT are close to reaching stage 3, that is, close to \nentering seizure proceedings; \n(viii) The SIT has invested in the rental building at Ebène named ‘The Core’. This asset \nhas cost the SIT Rs876 m. and has totally been financed by liabilities. The return \non investment on this building is very low and is not adequate to service the debt \nincurred thereof; \n(ix) The Sugar Investment Trust income stream comprises Rs30 m. from rental; Rs35 \nm. from 10,000 tons of sugarcane cultivated on 265 hectares of land which adds \nup to approximately Rs65 m. Finance costs are in excess of Rs115 m., which \nrendered the SIT insolvent; \n(x) \nThe debt capital is not being serviced at all since 2014 whilst interest is being \nserviced partly;  \n(xi) Rs12.8 m. have been taken from DBM Ltd to undertake sugarcane cultivation in \n2023, but it never happened; \n(xii)The SIT Leisure Water Park has been running on loses to the tune of Rs2 m. per \nmonth since 2015, whilst hefty unfinished investments have been apparently \nvested in this park without any feasibility plans or reports. At this instance, the \n\n90 \n \npark is in a dangerous state and requires immediate closure. Rs100 m. have been \ninvested in 2018 without any strict plans, and a further Rs250 m. have been \nnormally invested with a loan from MauBank. None of these investments can be \nseen at Belle Mare; \n(xiii) Many contracts from service providers have expired in 2020 and have never been \nrenewed by normal practice of tendering. The service suppliers have continued to \nbe renumerated, often at higher than market rates, which is totally illegal; \n(xiv) Loans undertaken and proceeds of sale of land cannot be matched against projects \nand cash flows. Accounts provided are totally flawed and against international \nfinancial reporting standards;  \n(xv) It unconceivable to see that the SIT has sold in excess of 5,000 arpents, but still \nbears a debt of more than Rs1.6 billion, together with a negative cashflow; \n(xvi) As at today, arrears relating to rental stand at Rs50 m.  \nMadam Speaker, a proper forensic audit is warranted at the SIT and firms may be \nemployed for same. Should the need arise or given strong suspicions of fraud and corruption, \nthe matter may be directly referred to the Financial Crimes Commission for a more in-depth \nforensic investigation. \nMeanwhile, my Ministry is presently looking in the restructuration of SIT for the \norganisation to become effective and efficient. I hope we can do it. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \n \nPUBLIC BILLS \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the following Bills were read a first time – \n(a) \nThe Supplementary Appropriation (2023-2024) (No. 2) Bill (No. VIII of 2025). \n(b) \nThe Supplementary Appropriation (2024-2025) Bill (No. IX of 2025). \n \nMOTION \nSTANDING ORDERS COMMITTEE – S.O. 73 REVIEW – PERFORMANCE-BASED \nBUDGETING (2025) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister! \n\n91 \n \n(4.14 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move the motion standing in my name \n– \n“This Assembly is of opinion that in view of the enactment of the Finance and Audit \n(Amendment) Act 2025 and the introduction of Performance-Based Budgeting, it is necessary \nand expedient that the Standing Orders Committee be, and is hereby, empowered to look into \nthe Standing Orders and Rules of the National Assembly 1995 presently in force, more \nspecifically Standing Order 73, with a view to making recommendations for the necessary \nchanges to be brought to the provisions relating to the procedure in connection with the \nAppropriation Bill”. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, in accordance with Standing Order 69 (3) (b), the \nmatter stands referred to the Standing Orders Committee.  \nWe can go on if you want? Well, if everybody wants to go for tea, I do not mind.  \nLet us break for tea! Laissez les neurones se reposer un peu ! \nAt 4.16 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.01 p.m., with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated! Hon. Prime Minister! \nPUBLIC BILLS \nSecond Reading \nTHE NATIONAL AGENCY FOR DRUG CONTROL BILL  \n(NO. VI OF 2025) \nOrder for Second Reading read. \n(5.01 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that the National Agency for \nDrug Control Bill (No. VI of 2025) be read a second time. \nThis Bill, in front of the House, is yet another concrete expression of the determination \nof this Government to honour its pledge of renewal to the nation.  \n\n92 \n \nMadam Speaker, I had the occasion the last few months to address the House on the \nappalling dilapidation of our institutions and the pillars of governance of our country. This \nwas not accidental or adventitious. The nation at large has taken cognisance of the \ncatastrophic state of our economy brought on by years of recklessness decisions and \ndeliberate sabotage of those perceived to have an adverse political affiliation to the previous \ngovernment. And it resulted in hundreds of millions of US dollars in costly awards and \njudgements against the same. \nEqually alarming is the nefarious legacy of drug addiction, drug trafficking, and other \ndrug-related crimes that the previous government has bequeathed us. The previous \ngovernment failed dismally to combat the escalation of the drug crisis in Mauritius. It almost \nappears – I am tempted to say ‘appears’ – to have been deliberately delaying action to tackle \ndrug trafficking, drug addiction and halt the proliferation of drug-related crimes. As a \nresponsible Government, we are duty bound to do away with the previous regime’s toxic \nlegacy arising from years of ineptitude, indifference and the obvious nexus between the drug \nbarons and the MSM. \nMadam Speaker, an American journalist, David Schrieberg, had written in an issue of \nNewsweek about the deadly dangers of drug proliferation. I want to quote him because it says \nexactly what we are saying. It says, and I quote –  \n“The largest, richest and deadliest criminal enterprise in history is penetrating deeply \ninto civil structures that make democracy what it is: justice systems, police forces, \npolitical parties, legislatures, electoral campaigns, (…) government ministries and \npresidential palaces”. \nThis, Madam Speaker, rings a very uncomfortable but recognisable bell with all those \nwho have observed with growing dismay the conduct of the previous government and the \ndisconcerting admission of the previous Prime Minister, who said that – he admitted – the \ndrug mafia has infiltrated all our institutions. The previous Prime Minister said that after \nnearly 10 years in power. Of course, we are familiar with that type of behaviour from the \nparty that brought us so many infamous and shameful moments. Let me just recall the \nhighlights of that tawdry – I think we could call it sinema.  \nThe House may recall how in 1985, a bunch of notorious drug traffickers was invited \nofficially to the garden party at Le Réduit for the independence celebration, where they lit \nfirecrackers and were shouting, “gouvernman dan nou lame, nou pou fer seki nou le”. It \n\n93 \n \nseems a new breed of traffickers still considered it until they were booted out that \ngouvernman dan nou lame, and it was during the lost and wasted decade of the MSM-led \ngovernment. \nThen, there was the episode of the Amsterdam boys: four MPs travelling with \ndiplomatic passports. Madam Speaker, believe it or not, those passports were given on a \nSaturday morning. The PMO was open for them; there were instructions to open the PMO \nand give them these diplomatic passports because they had to have diplomatic immunity. \nMadam Speaker, as we all know, they were arrested in December 1985 in possession of 20 \nkgs of heroin worth Rs36 million at that time. I bet you, had they not been arrested in \nAmsterdam, they would have walked in here with red carpet treatment. That is what the \nprevious government did; that is the mentality. And who can forget the hilarious and yet very \nserious incident when an exhibit of heroin in the custody of the police, when it was brought to \ncourt, turned out to be lamous sinwa. You can see the nexus. There has been cooperation \nright across the board.  \nIn 2017, one Veeren Peroumal, a notorious drug trafficker; some people call him the \nGodfather. He deponed in the Commission of Inquiry on Drug Trafficking chaired by former \nJudge Lam Shang Leen. He explained the modality of his contribution. At that time, he said \nhe spent Rs30 million to finance the electoral campaign of the MSM in 2014 – Rs30 million, \none drug trafficker! The Commission of Inquiry heard from the drug trafficker, Veeren \nPeroumal, that he kept his representation in-house. We can understand what that means – a \nclose circuit. All of them were members of the party of the government then. According to \nhim and another dealer, one Siddick Islam even informed the Commission that they paid their \ncounsels – believe it or not – with drug money, and the counsels accepted it. This is how the \nMSM operated. \nIn 2018, the Commissioner of Inquiry also referred, and I am quoting –  \n“Two very disturbing facts concerning one barrister-at-law representing Mr Peroumal \nand close to the previous Government who at that time occupied important positions”. \nThe Commission Report underscores and it says, I quote – \n“[Those] controlling the casinos, the gaming houses, horse racing where the \nCommission has reason to believe, in the light of the various testimonies received, are \nthe temples of money laundering by the accomplices of the drug traffickers [and] it is a \nmatter of concern”. \n\n94 \n \nThe Commission of Inquiry, Madam Speaker, expressed caving criticism of the \nactivities of certain barristers at law.  \n(Interruptions) \nAs going far beyond ethical, professional, and legal constraints in their representation of \nnotorious drug traffickers engaging in the conduct amounting to an attempt to pervert the \ncourse of justice. Will you believe this – barristers perverting the course of justice? \nThe Commission of Inquiry mentions how a lady minister of the then government, hon. \nMrs Roubina Jadoo-Jaunbocus, had visited 17 detainees in less than three hours and without \nbeing solicited. \n(Interruptions) \nShe came voluntarily, as if. On another occasion she visited 15 detainees and groups of \ndetainees.  \nThereby, the Commission says, when we have a group of detainees together, they are \nall accused of drug dealing; you bring them together, and you are facilitating the exchange of \ninformation between them – a barrister doing this? It was also established that she had been \nin communication with the most notorious convicted drug trafficker, again this Mr Veeren \nPeroumal; that is why they all shouted the name, the pet name “kala prizon” – that is the \nname. \nAnother one Jeeva and one Bottesoie explained how they had been enticed not to \nimplicate certain persons and to devir lanket. They are very strong at that. You are saying the \nFCC is arresting people. There are going to be attempts to devir lanket la, but I tell them, ‘Do \nyou want to do this’? Think again! We have the response for them. \nIn 2017, Madam Speaker, a record seizure of heroin made the headlines; 119.5 kgs of \nheroin worth Rs1.8 billion was found onboard of a ship among imports from a company \ncalled Brilliant Resources Consulting Ltd. Owned by whom? By one Geanchand Dewdanee. \nHis proximity with the Leader of the MSM is well known. At first, he said ‘I did not know \nhim’, and Dewdanee responded, ‘ask him who used to put brinzel?’ \n(Interruptions) \nKamaron dan frizider ! \n(Interruptions) \n\n95 \n \nBred ossi mo kroir linn mete! \nAn hon. Member: Bred sonz! Bred sonz! \nThe Prime Minister: Bred sonz! \n(Interruptions) \nAnd what happened afterwards, Madam Speaker, is shocking! He is arrested. The former \nPrime Minister said he did not know him, then he made those remarks, and then believe or \nnot, by magic, the provisional charges were dropped. Completely dropped, as if nothing \nhappened! Ankor enn fwa lanket inn devire! \nEqually shocking, in 2019, 95 kgs of cocaine estimated at – they do not talk about \nmillions, these people, billions – Rs1.4 billion hidden in a tractopelle. It escaped the control \nof the Custom Officers at the port, despite the fact that the port was fully equipped with \nmodern equipment and sniffing dogs to detect drugs. No, it went through! What is even more \nstriking is that the cocaine travelled alongside Mauricio, that is, the first metro tram which \nreached Mauritius. And believe it or not, the tram came out; who was there? The whole \nCabinet with the Prime Minister welcoming everybody. The tram has come!  And the tram \nhas come with drugs, right in front of the nose!  \nAnd you know, Madam Speaker, nobody up to now has been arrested. Nobody! As \nusual, lanket devire! We know, Madam Speaker, that regrettably, cocaine is used as a \nrecreational drug by some of the most affluent classes in our country, but the law cannot and \ndoes not apply to only one class of persons. As I said in the recent passing out ceremony for \nPolice Constables, and I quote again – \n“We cannot allow unruly elements who may have thought they are above the law to \nthreaten the very fabric of our society. No one is above the law.” \nI am tempted to quote this great Judge who became Master of the Rolls, Lord Denning. This \nis what he said – \n“To every citizen of this land, however powerful, I would use Thomas Fuller's words \nover three hundred years ago, 'Be ye never so high, the law is above you'.” \nMadam Speaker, while the Labour Government has invested to transform Grand Bassin \ninto Ganga Talao, into a peaceful spiritual sanctuary, some were busy transforming an area \nvery close to Ganga Talao into a narco-sanctuary. That is what they did. The previous \n\n96 \n \ngovernment, under very suspicious conditions, granted a lease to Eco Deer Park. It was found \nout subsequently that the land had been converted into a fancy rave party… \nMr Jhummun: Stag Party! \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, Stag Party, where cochon marron, drugs, alcoholic drinks \nwere available à gogo, and at least, one previous Minister, probably two, I am told, were \nthere. And no less a person than the former Attorney General of this country! This is the level \nwe had reached. The case is being investigated just now by the FCC, so I will not make more \ncomments. \nAnd then, Madam Speaker, who has not heard of Hubert Celerine, better known as \nFranklin? Notorious Roi de l’Ouest… \nAn hon. Member: Business Class! \nThe Prime Minister: …who was actively involved in many questionable activities, \nperpetrated with the apparent blessing of the political masters of the day. He was even \nallowed to occupy State land, in this salubrious land at Rivière Noire. And when there were \nseveral requests for his extradition from Reunion Island where he had already been sentenced \nto imprisonment, he did not want to go into prison. So, what did they do? They protected \nhim. The then government deliberately tried to prevent his extradition. So many times, the \nthen Attorney General was answering questions here, looking for little change in the phrases \nto say that they are looking into it. They were looking as usual; with the MSM, they are \nalways looking into it. When he was finally extradited, why? Because of public outcry and \nthe then Opposition!  What happened? He was given VVIP treatment, enjoying the comfort \nof business class. This is how drug barons were treated by the former regime. \nIt begs the question, Madam Speaker.  Is it sheer coincidence that each time the MSM \nhas been in power, each time we saw a prolific resurgence of drug traffickers in the country? \nIs it a coincidence? We have seen the same saga since 1985, and after 10 years, we have just \nseen, we have to see, everybody knows les ravages et les torts que la drogue est en train de \nfaire à notre jeunesse. This is the legacy of the MSM. \nWe have stated in no uncertain terms in the Government Programme that the fight \nagainst drug trafficking and use will be one of the main priorities of the Government. We \nhave no choice; every Government has to defend the citizens of the country. We will \nimplement bold measures to end the suffering of families with an unflinching resolve to deal \nwith this major societal scourge. It is important, Madam Speaker, to make a distinction \n\n97 \n \nbetween the victim of drug abuse and the trafficker. In this respect, let me remind the House \nwhat the late Sir Maurice Rault said way back in 1986 in his report of the Commission of \nEnquiry on Drugs, which he chaired. He said – \n“Addiction is the modern form of slavery. The addict is chained to the trafficker by \nbonds as cruel as those which tie the slaves to his Lord and he runs the same risk of \nmoral defilement. Since he cannot disobey his master, he can be compelled to cheat, to \nsteal or even sell his body.” \nThat is what he said in his report. \nMadam Speaker, the National Agency for Drug Control, this Bill, represents a crucial \nstep in fulfilling our commitment to fight against this blight which is posing a significant \nthreat to the health, security and future of our nation. It has taken the proportion of as if a \nserious epidemic. Today, we present not just a legal framework but a vision for a safer \nMauritius, free from the devastating impact of this deadly threat.  \nFor the first time in the country, Madam Speaker, we are proposing a fully integrated \nstrategy, actionable by an agency that will bring together all the various public bodies \ninvolved; all under one roof to combat drug trafficking, provide rehabilitation and support \nfamilies of the victims of drug abuse. The legal provisions in respect of trafficking, \nconsumption and treatment of drug addicts will be reviewed to cater, inter alia, for \ndifferentiated treatment of traffickers and consumers.  \nI remember, Madam Speaker, I was invited by the former President of the United \nStates, President Clinton, at the Clinton Global Initiative, and during dinner he asked me, ‘are \nyou using methadone in your country for treatment?’ I had to say no. I cannot say I was \naware of it either, but I said no. And he said it is one decision that he regretted when he was \nPresident. He regretted that he never used methadone, and he immediately made funds \navailable for antiretroviral drugs for HIV patients and earmarked part of it for the provision of \nmethadone. We received 36,270 US Dollars in all. And what happened when we lost the \nelections in 2014? The previous Minister said, ‘Ah, methadone?  Not necessary’. He stopped \nmethadone. \n(Interruptions) \nYes! \n\n98 \n \nThere was a prominent professor in La Réunion. He gave an interview – I think in \nl’Express, but I am not sure – and he said, ‘it is a huge mistake to stop methadone’. And what \nhappened? He had to backtrack, and they restarted the methadone programme afterwards. \nTrial and error! There was no scientific purpose in what they were doing! They just tried this \nand that. Because the previous government had introduced this programme, they stopped it! \nAnd then, they had to backtrack! \nThe measures we are proposing to the House today, Madam Speaker, evince the \ndetermination of this Government to address the multifarious challenges posed by drug \nabuse. Every day, we witness disastrous consequences on families. We see how families, \nwithout distinction of class or community, are totally shattered; how the healthcare system is \nhaving difficulties in coping with this problem; and how drug-related crimes are increasing. \nThis is threatening our youth. Indeed, they are the future of our nation. The future of our \nnation is being threatened! \nOver the recent years, Madam Speaker, no significant, effective and tangible measures \nhave been taken to combat this crisis. It is abundantly clear that there was no genuine will to \nremedy the situation by the previous government. We all know how the conclusions and \nrecommendations of the Commission of Inquiry on Drugs were mostly ignored. Just a few \nhere and there were taken on board. The situation continued to deteriorate under their \ncomplaisant or complicit watch. \nThe previous government dismantled NATReSA and did not replace it with any \nalternative to carry out the important work of harm reduction. Nothing! Yet, it is clear that the \ntraditional approach to dealing with such a complex problem with wide-ranging ramifications \nis totally outdated today.  \nThe World Drug Report of 2023, Madam Speaker, warned of a proliferation of supply, \ndemand and use of synthetic drugs as well as an increase in substance use disorders. The \nnumber of people using drugs has increased by 11 per cent globally but by as much as 40 per \ncent in Africa in 2023! In response to the growing threats posed by synthetic drugs, the \nUnited States launched the Global Coalition to Address Synthetic Drugs Threats, aimed at \naccelerating the international efforts to tackle this rising crisis.  \nAs part of the Global Coalition Initiative, the Government of the United States provided \nfunding to the UNODC to conduct a detailed assessment of the threats posed by synthetic \n\n99 \n \ndrugs. This project also evaluated the national and regional capacities of six East African \ncountries. That includes Mauritius.  \nLook at what the report says. It is not finalised yet, but we have part of it. As part of the \nassessment, in July 2024, the UNODC conducted a study on synthetic drugs, especially in \nMauritius. Among the main findings, I quote – \n“Mauritius has been identified as the leading user of synthetic cannabinoids.”  \nLeading user!  \nThe other findings include the following comments – \n“(…) Drug rehabilitation efforts within the public sector remain severely limited. \nAlthough methadone treatment is now available, other forms of treatment remain \nunderdeveloped and inadequate. Psychological support and interventions, including \ntraditional medicine, where available, need further strengthening. [In fact, they were not \nusing anything!] With limited resources and insufficient follow-up, many individuals \neither failed to comply or relapsed after finishing the treatment (…).” \nMadam Speaker, the threat posed by synthetic cannabinoids and other drugs in \nMauritius has already been highlighted in the Globalised Organized Crime Index of 2023, \nwhich actually measured 15 criminal markets, including drug markets, across 193 member \nStates. And guess what? Mauritius ranked 7th, out of 193, in regard to synthetic drugs! 7th! \nJust behind South Africa! \nHowever, in spite of Mauritius forming part of the US Global Coalition since \nNovember 2023, the previous government just allowed the situation to worsen. They could \nnot care less. They failed to realise the benefits; there were benefits and resources available \nfor the coalition to strengthen the country’s response, but they did nothing. This laxisme \namounts to gross negligence – I would say criminal negligence – coupled with the obvious \nproximity of notorious traffickers with the previous regime. They have contributed greatly to \nthe quagmire we find ourselves in today. I think – I am not mincing my words – it is \ntantamount to their betrayal; a betrayal to the whole nation of this country! We cannot, and \nwe will not, continue to pay lip service to the challenges related to national security, \nincluding those relating to drug trafficking. \n\n100 \n \nWe know, Madam Speaker, most of the drugs available in Mauritius, from the reports \nwe see from ADSU and others, come from the sea. Not all, but most. It is a fact that we \ncannot deal with the drug problem in isolation. We cannot! We are partners with the Indian \nOcean Commission and with countries of the Indian Ocean for sharing of information and \njoint patrolling of our respective maritime zone. The actual Commissioner of Police, who was \nat ADSU, was cooperating fully. We were getting advanced information – I said mostly from \nthe sea – but even in planes, information was shared. With the MSM, it seemed that they \nwere not interested to share information.  \nThe Regional Maritime Information Fusion Centre in Madagascar is responsible for \nproducing a single recognised maritime picture of the Western Indian Ocean and identifying \nvessels of interest. The Regional Operation Centre in Seychelles is dedicated to the \ncoordination of the regional operations at sea with respect to maritime safety and security in \nour region. \nBut the truth is, Madam Speaker, the previous government failed to act on the \ninformation they received on the suspicious movement of ships, most probably transporting \nsubstances through our waters. They did not respond. I will give an example. In June of last \nyear, there were two ships nearing our shores. One was heading to Seychelles, and the other \none was heading to Mauritius. The one that went to Seychelles – because they received the \ninformation – was arraigned by the Seychelles authorities, and 900 kg of narcotics were \nseized. 900 kg! However, what happened to the ship advancing in our waters? It was allowed \nto move freely! Nobody even stopped it. The police were made aware of this information; \nthey were made aware, but either they received orders or they just turned a deaf ear! Much to \nthe dismay and astonishment of the Regional Maritime Information Centre! \nSimilarly, we have the assistance of countries like India, the United States, and France \nto enhance this regional maritime security architecture to combat, on a broad range, all the \nillegal activities on the high seas.  \nTo reinforce maritime surveillance, we are setting up a National Maritime Information \nSharing Centre which will be fully equipped to monitor, analyse and report all vessels \nundertaking illicit activities in our EEZ. The invaluable support of the Government of India \nhas been obtained to set up that centre. The building is under construction, and an Indian \nNaval Officer is in Mauritius to assist in the setting up of this centre. \n\n101 \n \nAlso, with the assistance of the Government of Japan, a new coastal surveillance \nsystem will be installed to replace the old one, the old one which I had procured at the time \nwhen I was Prime Minister. They allowed it to just be out of service. Nobody was interested \nin having that because, in fact, they did not want to monitor. Additionally, the operation of \nthe Coast Guard is being thoroughly reviewed to ensure that information gathered regionally \nis used in an optimal way. \nMadam Speaker, under this Government, the ADSU and the Customs Department have \nadopted a new approach to tracking drug dealers. I will obviously not mention what the new \nmethods are. But from November 2024 to March 2025, we have witnessed a significant \nnumber of seizures of drugs, amounting to an approximate value of Rs1.2 billion. The Police \nand the Customs will be equipped with a state-of-the-art equipment to enable them to \nundertake their mandate in a more effective manner. \nMadam Speaker, since this new Government came to power, it has started to devise \nways and means to deal with the problem of drug abuse. I have listed the services, and I am \nglad he is here, of the former minister, Sam Lauthan, and Dr. Fayzal Sulliman, who is also \nhere. The latter – everybody knows Sam Lauthan, but maybe not everybody knows Dr. \nSulliman – is a graduate from Johns Hopkins University in the United States of America. He \npossesses wide experience in addiction medicine and HIV/AIDS. Both of them have \nextensive experience in the field, and they will focus on prevention, treatment and \nenforcement. \nMore importantly, Madam Speaker, what we need is people who want to do something \nand not people who are going to sit there like des poupées en cire doing nothing, just to show \nthey are there and getting paid for it. This is what we don’t want. We want people who are \ndetermined, like these two gentlemen are, to put an end to this terrible scourge that is \nhappening. They have already worked closely in collaboration with the Deputy Prime \nMinister, the Attorney General and my Office, and, I must say, within a very short time they \nhave come up with a Bill to set up an agency for drug control. We are indebted to them for \ntheir prompt and effective work. \nMadam Speaker, the Bill will establish the National Agency for Drug Control as the \napex body responsible for addressing all the problems that are connected with drug abuse, not \njust in Mauritius but also Rodrigues. They will look through the reduction of supply, drug \nuse, prevention, treatment and all this. It will be a balanced approach. This is in line with the \n\n102 \n \nmost recent United Nations Resolution 79/191 of 2024, which continues to stress the \nimportance of a balanced approach integrating measures for demand and supply reduction \nand ensuring that drug control policies are in line with human rights obligations. It \nunderscores the necessity of international cooperation and the implementation of evidence-\nbased practices in drug policies; it is not just somebody dreaming of something; it must be \nevidence-based. This is how you can fight this scourge. \nMadam Speaker, let me give the House an outline of the Bill. The Bill provides for the \nsetting up of this National Agency for Drug Control which will have broader responsibilities \nand powers than the defunct National Agency for Treatment and Rehabilitation of Substance \nAbusers (NATReSA).  \nSection 3 of the Bill provides for the setting up of a National Drug Control Commission \nunder my chairmanship and comprising the Deputy Prime Minister as Vice-chairperson, the \nMinister of Health and Wellness, the Attorney General, eight Ministers as enumerated in the \nFirst Schedule, when they are needed, all the Ministers as the Prime Minister may designate. \nThe Chief Commissioner of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly may, at the request of the \nPrime Minister, attend the Commission and persons who have wide experience in medical \nand health care, drug use prevention or treatment and rehabilitation, as I may designate.  \nSection 4 of the Bill defines the functions and powers of the National Drug Control \nCommission, which include, among others, setting up national objectives and goals, and \ndetermining policies and priorities with regard to drug control issues. Secondly, to oversee \nthe overall coordination of all drug control activities in Mauritius - that is why I say it is \nunder an apex body - for greater collaboration and synergy among stakeholders. Also, to \ncollect and analyse data and publish a brief statistical and analytical bulletin on a quarterly \nbasis and a comprehensive National Drug Observatory report annually to monitor the nature, \nmagnitude, patterns, and trends in drug trafficking and drug use.  \nSection 5 of the Bill provides for the National Agency for Drug Control to be a body \ncorporate.  \nSection 6 provides for it to have the following divisions – \n(i) \na Policy, Research and Strategy Division; \n(ii) \na Treatment and Rehabilitation Services Division; \n\n103 \n \n(iii) a Prevention and Public Awareness Division; \n(iv) an HIV and AIDS Prevention and Care Coordination Division, and \n(v) \nsuch other Division as the Board may, with the approval of the Minister, set up.  \nSection 7 of the Bill defines the responsibilities of the Agency which are – \n(i) \nreducing the demands of drugs; \n(ii) \ncoordinating the reduction of supply of drugs by preventing, reducing or \ndisrupting the entry, production and availability of drugs.  \nSection 8 of the Bill defines the functions of the six Divisions of the Agency. In a \nnutshell, each Division will have distinct responsibilities and thus contribute to the overall \nfunctioning of the Agency.  \nThe Supply Reduction and Coordination Division will coordinate national law \nenforcement efforts to ensure compliance with local, national and international drug control \nlaws and international conventions. It will also facilitate cooperation with the Police, the \nCustoms and Excise Department of the Mauritius Revenue Authority, and also with local and \ninternational organisations. More importantly, it will assist the Financial Intelligence Unit and \nany other relevant organisations such as the National Crime Agency, which we will legislate \nvery soon, in due course, in tracing and detecting money laundering and forensic financial \ntrades related to drug trafficking.  \nThe Treatment and Rehabilitation Services Division will work in close collaboration \nwith the Ministry of Health and Wellness, the NGOs and the Drug Users Administrative \nPanel for the treatment and rehabilitation of persons who use drugs, and their social \nintegration back into society. It will also establish and manage, in collaboration with the \nprivate sector and relevant Government organisations, vocational training and employment \nprogrammes for persons who are recovering from drug use disorders.  \nThe Prevention and Public Awareness Division will lead national awareness campaigns, \ncarry out workshops, and develop and implement a family-based drug prevention \nprogramme. \nSection 9 of the Bill provides for the setting up of a Drug Control Board for the \nadministration and management of the NADC. There will be a chairperson and \n\n104 \n \nrepresentatives of various ministries and organisations as well as representatives of civil \nsociety.  \nSection 18 of the Bill provides for the Agency to prepare an Annual Report and submit \nto the Minister together with an audited statement of accounts in every financial year – this \nwas totally lacking before.  \nSection 21 of the Bill provides for no liability, civil or criminal, shall attach to the \nNADC, the Board, a board member, a committee member or any officer in respect of any act \ndone or omitted to be done in good faith – it has to be in good faith – in the discharge of its \nfunction under the Act.  \nSection 25 of Bill provides for the protection of whistleblowers to encourage reporting \nof illicit activities. We will be careful because we know how Mauritius is. There will be some \nfake whistleblowers as well; we will be very careful with this. No civil or criminal action \nshall be taken against any person who makes a report or disclosure; it has to be in good faith. \nIf it is a false accusation, they will have to pay the consequences. \nMadam Speaker, the success of this initiative depends on a unified approach. The fight \nagainst drugs cannot be won in isolation. It is not a question of Government on one side and \nOpposition on the other; we have to work together on this. Il faut une prise de conscience \ncollective. Il faut responsabiliser chaque Mauricienne, chaque Mauricien pour briser cette \nprolifération de la drogue qui est en train de faire des ravages dans notre pays, dans notre \nsociété et tuer notre jeunesse, notre avenir. Government institutions, law enforcement \nagencies, non-governmental organisations and the community at large must work together \nhand in hand. The NADC will play a pivotal role in promoting cooperation and systemic \ncoherence in ensuring that our interventions are aligned and effective. \nFurthermore, the Bill prioritises data collection and research to ensure that our \nstrategies are continuously refined based on the latest evidence, enabling evidence-based \npolicy making to tackle the evolving drug landscape. A real-time monitoring system with \nclear performance indicators will be implemented to track drug-related trends and assess the \neffectiveness of intervention programmes. The system will also be used to monitor patients \non the methadone programme, thus ensuring better control and management. There have \nbeen, in the past, some complaints about whether methadone is becoming. We will also look \nat that.  \n\n105 \n \nThe NADC will operate in 24/7 hotline specific for disclosures and work closely with \nlaw enforcement agencies to ensure swift actions on credible disclosures with the utmost \nconfidentiality and protection for individuals involved.  \nDuring the last elections, not just in my constituency, in many constituencies across the \nisland, probably all constituencies, we could see people dealing with drugs; nothing was \nbeing done. I get the feeling they were being given drugs so that they could disrupt the \nelection; that was my feeling.  What else? Don’t forget, Wakashio! Why did Wakashio come \nat the time that it came? We must ask ourselves questions.  \nWe are also positioning an HIV/AIDS Division under the agency within the Prime \nMinister’s Office and this will bring several key advantages such as enhanced intersectoral \ncoordination. HIV/AIDS is a cross-cutting issue as we all know, but it cannot be addressed \njust by the health sector alone. Locating the division within the agency at the highest level of \ngovernance will ensure all relevant ministries, that is, health, education, youth, gender \nequality, social security, and justice are all bought together under a cohesive national \nframework fostering a whole of Government approach.  \nPlacing HIV/AIDS Division within the NADC will ensure better alignment between \nharm reduction strategies and national drug control, particularly regarding needle exchange \nprogrammes. This is where the connection is: opioid substitution therapy and rehabilitation \ninitiatives. This integration will lead to smarter, more efficient, and more compassionate \npolicies for vulnerable populations. \nMadam Speaker, a centrally located division will better coordinate national budgets, \ndonor funding technical support. It will facilitate synergy between the various partners and \navoid what has happened in the past – duplication of efforts. And it will ensure that our \nnational strategies are guided by consistent policies and unified vision.  \nMadam Speaker, the National Agency for Drug Control Bill is not merely a piece of \nlegislation. It is a national commitment; it represents our collective resolve. We need to \nsafeguard the future of our youth, as I said earlier, protect our communities, and ensure that \nMauritius does not fall victim to the far-reaching consequences of drug abuse.   \nMadam Speaker, we have a duty to our children, to our families, to our nation to act \ndecisively. I urge all Members of the House to support this Bill as it is a decisive step towards \na drug-free Mauritius.  \n\n106 \n \nLet us stand together in demonstrating our unflinching resolve to fight drug abuse and \ntrafficking, and secure a healthier, safer and a more prosperous future for all. Unless means \nare found to stop the decline and decay we have witnessed for the last decade, every one of \nour children is at risk. No Mauritian family is immune from this threat. Far too many have \nawoken up one day to the tragic realisation that a son or a daughter has fallen prey to the \npredators and parasites who seek to prosper from this disgusting criminal trade.  \nI remember, Madam Speaker, I went to a wedding at Camp Fouquereaux. When I came \nout, as usual, people wanted to take pictures with me; even when I was in the Opposition. \nOne guy came up to me and asked – \n“Can I take a picture with you?”  \nI said, “Yes, no problem.”  \nHe stood there, he gave the phone to one of the policemen with me, and he said to me –  \n“You know, I want to tell you something. I had voted against Labour Party last time, \nbut now I am praying every day that you come back to power because my son has \nfallen into drug abuse. He is coming at home; he is beating up his mother, beating up \nthe father, stealing money, stealing jewellery, just to be able to buy drugs.” \nThis is what we have to stop. This I why I say we have a duty to act decisively. Unless, \nas I said, no Mauritian family is immune from this threat and we have to stop them. In this \nbattle against drugs, none of us should look the other way. All of us must bear the \nresponsibility of playing our part in defeating the social poison; this social poison that they \nhave inserted into the lifeblood of our nation. That is what they have done. And, in that battle, \neach one of us, Madam Speaker, is on the frontline.  \nI commend the Bill to the House. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you!  \nHon. Leader of the Opposition!  \n(5.45 p.m.) \nThe Leader of the Opposition (Mr G. Lesjongard): Merci, Madame la présidente.  \nSi vous me permettez, je vais, avec la permission du Premier ministre, démarrer mon \nintervention en empruntant une phrase qu’il a mentionnée, surtout qui est en relation avec une \n\n107 \n \nprise de conscience collective et c’est vrai parce que le sujet est d’ordre national et c’est un \nfléau qui fait beaucoup de tort au pays. \nMadame la présidente, je suis conscient du désarroi des parents qui sont affectés par ce \nfléau. Je suis père de famille, je suis grand-père et je note de jour en jour que la situation \ns’aggrave dans le pays et que cette jeune génération que nous avons, petit à petit, s’enfonce \ndans ce fléau qu’est en train de ronger notre société. \nAyant dit ceci, Madame la présidente, we are today debating on a Bill which will \nreplace the NATRESA by a new agency called the National Agency for Drug Control. And, I \nunderstand from the Explanatory Memorandum, that this agency will have a number of new \nattributes and the agency will provide additional support to authorities concerned in the \ncombat against drug trafficking and drug use.  \nLike I said, Madam Speaker, it is indeed a subject that needs to be addressed quickly \nbecause the situation on our streets is getting alarming day by day. And one drug, in \nparticular, which we commonly call synthetic drug. Our citizens are being transformed, we \nhave seen that on the social media, into zombies, Madam Speaker and in some cases being \nled to their death and government seems to be helpless in the wake of this situation.  \nWe understand, Madam Speaker, that the National Agency for Drug Control will be the \napex body which will address drug issue prevention and drug control issues. Madam Speaker, \nlet me tell the House that there are three major components in this struggle. First one is harm \nreduction, then supply reduction and demand reduction and all those three components aim at \nmaking Mauritius a better place to live but having different mission statements. \nLet me say something with regard to harm reduction, Madam Speaker. It is the \nidentification by the health authorities of the best practices as regards to medical treatment for \nthe proper detoxification of drug addicts. The demand reduction comprises of the demand \nreduction strategies with rehabilitation possibilities in residential or daycare centres and for \nthe follow up. \n Madam Speaker, it must be remembered that addiction is the consumption of one or \nseveral substances meaning that after detox, if one restarts consuming drugs again, we are \nback to square one and we have to start the process all over again.  \nMadam Speaker, it should be noted also that participation to all above mentioned \nservices should be inclusive of HIV/AIDS carriers. It is also understood, Madam Speaker, \nthat drug demands strategies, also include another important part which is to carry out \n\n108 \n \nextensive prevention programmes where we target workplace, women, youth, schools, be it \npre-primary, primary, secondary or tertiary and also the community at large. \nMadam Speaker, we have no other choice today than to prevent new cases of addiction \nand help those already hooked up to start back a new and responsible life.  \nWith regard to supply reduction, this sensitive issue, Madam Speaker, must be left to \nthe competent authorities of the country, that is, the Government, the Judiciary, law makers, \nthe Police and the MRA, to be addressed at their respective levels. But they will have to work \nin collaboration with other stakeholders whereby those stakeholders can submit their \nsuggestions and proposals to these authorities for consideration. \nWe should also, Madam Speaker, understand the difficulty faced by substance abusers \nto quit. These difficulties, I understand, are la peur du manque, Madame la présidente, ce \nqu’on appelle fat yen, et le plaisir de l’aiguille for those who are injecting, that is, nissa \nzegui. Madam Speaker, if we understand the above, addressing this scourge will be much \neasier.  \nI heard the hon. Prime Minister speak about methadone treatment. Madam Speaker, \nmethadone is being proposed as maintenance or substitution therapy. Here, again, c’est à la \nliberté du toxicomane de choisir. Methadone was introduced in Mauritius not to stop drug \naddiction, but to break the fast spreading of HIV/AIDS disease among injecting drug users. \nIn fact, Madam Speaker, it must not be forgotten that methadone is a high addictive \nopiate and it will be more difficult for an addict to detox from it. It is a pity today, Madam \nSpeaker, that more than 10,000 methadone users are on maintenance therapy which is almost \nimposed on them. I believe that they should be left with the decision to use it on a temporary \nbasis until they are clean. If I am not wrong, the proposed dose to start the treatment is 40ml. \nHow can you, Madam Speaker, expect a substance abuser, on 100ml methadone maintenance, \nto quit? \nAnother issue which I want to raise today, Madam Speaker, in this piece of legislation \nis related to the Certificate of Character. People having already undergone their sentence for \nmere consumption of drugs and petty larcenies should be allowed to have a clear Certificate \nof Character, Madam Speaker, so that they can start back a new and responsible life. \nSomeone cannot pay Rs500 for possession of drugs and be sentenced for life with a \nCertificate of Character which will prevent him to get a job. In short, Madam Speaker, what I \n\n109 \n \nam proposing in this House today is to give serious consideration to an amnesty for all those \nin such situations.  \nMadam Speaker, let me now come to some sections of the Bill. At clause 3 (5), Madam \nSpeaker, it is mentioned that – \n“The Chief Executive Officer shall attend every meeting of the National Drug Control \nCommission.” \nHowever, at clause 5 (3), it is said that – \n“Subject to this Act, NADC shall, in the discharge of its functions and exercise of its \npowers, not be under the direction and control of any person or authority.” \nI can hardly imagine a CEO of such an agency, Madam Speaker, who is being \nnominated by the hon. Prime Minister, forced to attend meetings chaired by the same Prime \nMinister and make decisions that will go against the will of the very Prime Minister, Madam \nSpeaker!  \nI believe, Madam Speaker, that this new agency should have been fully independent \nwith no interference from the Executive, that is, the Cabinet of Ministers, but answerable to \nParliament. \nIt is only through this way, Madam Speaker, that would be guaranteed the collect and \nanalysis of real data on the situation of drugs prevailing in our country. I must say, Madam \nSpeaker, I have no qualms with my friend, the proposed CEO of the National Agency for \nDrug Control, who has spent most of his life combatting scourges that affect our youth, \nincluding drug abuse. He was also one of the assessors on the Commission of Enquiry against \nDrugs instituted in 2017. \nHowever, il va m’excuser pour ce que je vais dire. I believe that his views and methods \nmight be outdated in comparison to what is being implemented in other countries to combat \ndrug use. I will comment further on that at a later stage. Mais je le souhaite bon vent et qu’il \nréussisse dans le travail qu’il va entreprendre.  \nComme mentionné, Madame la présidente, dans le projet de loi, cinq divisions vont \nopérer sous cette commission. Je voudrais faire deux commentaires. Le premier concerne the \nTreatment and Rehabilitation Services Division. I hope it will look into the pharmacological \nand physio social treatment.  \n(Interruptions) \n\n110 \n \nYes, I said pharmacological and physio social treatment!  \nLe second concerne le Supply Reduction and Coordination division. I hope the role and \nresponsibilities of that division will be clearly spelt in order to avoid any misunderstanding \nwith the law enforcement sector. Madam Speaker, clause 7 deals with the objects of the \nNational Agency for Drug Control. I wish to refer the House to clause 7 (b). My question \nwith regard to clause 7 (b) is whether it will also include precursor chemicals and other \nchemical substances used in the manufacturing of illicit drugs? \nToujours, concernant cette section 7 (b), Madame la présidente, je cite –  \n“7.  \nObjects of NADC \n(b) \nto coordinate the supply reduction of drugs by preventing, reducing \nor disrupting the entry, production and availability of drugs.”  \nMa question est : est-ce que cette section veut dire que la NADC va participer à la \nsaisie des drogues ? Si c’est le cas, Madame la présidente, je ne pense pas que ce soit une \nsage décision de mélanger saisie de drogues, arrestation, réhabilitation et réinsertion. À la \nsection 24 de ce projet de loi, il y a une clause sur la confidentialité et une amende pouvant \naller jusqu’à R 100,000 et une peine de prison pouvant aller jusqu’à deux ans \nd’emprisonnement contre toute personne qui, sans aucune excuse valable, va à l’encontre de \ncette section.  \nSoyons sérieux, Madame la présidente ! \nAn hon. Member: Ah bon? Ah bon? \nMr Jhummun: Dix an to’nn dormi! \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Met serye to mem! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Let him develop his ideas! Allez-y ! \nMr Lesjongard: Nous savons tous, Madame la présidente, qu’un baron de la drogue \npeut récompenser une taupe avec deux, voire dix fois cette somme pour une précieuse… \nAn hon. Member: To bien kone! \n\n111 \n \nMr Lesjongard: …une précieuse information qui permettrait d’éviter de perdre une \nimportante cargaison de drogues, voire même de se faire arrêter.  \nEt d’une façon générale, je pose la question, sommes-nous pas en train d’ajouter une \nlourdeur administrative inutile sur un processus qui se devait être discret, efficace et une \nentité qui aura à sa disposition un budget colossal ? \n(Interruptions) \nMadame la présidente, nous sommes en train de remplacer la NATReSA que j’estime \navait fait un bon travail… \n(Interruptions) \n…par le National Agency for Drug Control, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: NADC. \nMr Lesjongard : Ma question est : est-ce qu’il y a eu consultation avec ces acteurs \navant de proposer ce projet de loi à la Chambre ? \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker : Les acteurs ? Les partenaires vous voulez dire ? \nAn hon. Member : … partenaires. \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard: Madam Speaker, under the previous Government, whether they agree \nor not, a huge step was made by amending the Dangerous Drugs Act in 2022. \n(Interruptions) \nLa possession de drogue à usage personnel a été décriminalisée depuis trois ans. Comme \nc’est le cas dans plusieurs pays, nous avons décidé de traiter les usagers de drogues comme \ndes patients qui sont ainsi placés sous des traitements par le ministère de la Santé. Dans la \nmême foulée, Madame la présidente, nous avions introduit l’utilisation du cannabis médical \net c’est cette décision qui a donné lieu au débat sur la légalisation ou non du cannabis à usage \nrécréatif et j’estime que la question mérite d’être posée. J’aimerais bien que le Premier \nministre dans son summing up nous donne les chiffres du nombre de saisies de drogues \nsynthétiques effectuées depuis le début de l’année. \n (Interruptions) \n\n112 \n \nBien sûr, Madame la présidente, je ne fais que relancer le débat mais cela ne veut pas \ndire que je suis pour la légalisation du cannabis.  \n(Interruptions) \nComme le Premier ministre adjoint l’avait affirmé sur une radio privée à la veille des \ndernières élections générales, je pense moi aussi que la question mérite d’être posée, Madame \nla présidente.  \nConcernant l’utilisation de la méthadone, malheureusement nous avons deux écoles de \npensée dans le pays ; ceux qui estiment que la méthadone aide à réduire les risques de \ntransmission du VIH sida en diminuant l’usage de seringues et en aidant un usager de drogue \nà arrêter la consommation de drogues dures, et d’autres qui pensent que c’est une perte de \ntemps. Il faut faire une évaluation…  \n(Interruptions) \n…il faut voir ce que disent les chiffres et évaluer sa réussite.  \nEn tout cas, Madame la présidente, le trafic de cette substance est problématique et \ndans certaines régions de l’île, les habitants ne veulent plus voir des centres de distribution de \nméthadone et il y a aussi une stigmatisation terrible envers ceux qui prennent de la \nméthadone. Madame la présidente, la section 8(1)(b)(iv) de ce projet de loi fait mention d’un \nReal Time Tracking system. Est-ce que le Premier ministre peut donner à de la Chambre plus \nde détails sur ce système et comment cela va se passer dans les faits ? \n Madam Speaker, I welcome the initiative to introduce the education sector on the \nagenda of the NADC. It should start with our youths; they should understand why it is not an \nact of bravery to consume any drugs. Obviously, there is peer pressure and lack of maturity. I \nam sure, we had all seen the video of a student inhaling what seems to be some kind of \ndeodorant from a plastic apparatus and I hope the Minister does not claim that this happened \nwhen the previous regime was in power. We need to act, our children need to realise that \ntheir lives are at stake and such behaviour, Madam Speaker, is not tolerable. Taking on board \nthe education sector, is, I believe, a step in the right direction when it comes to drug use. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to HIV/AIDS, I notice that the Bill also includes the \nprevention and reduction of risks of transmission of HIV/AIDS. There is clause 8(1)(d), an \nHIV and AIDS Prevention and Care Coordination Division which as stated in the piece of \nlegislation, has clear functions. I would like for the hon. Prime Minister to enlighten the \n\n113 \n \nHouse as to what will happen to the NGO PILS whose sole function, Madam Speaker, is \nexactly what this Bill provides for. May I ask the question, has there been proper \nconsultations with that NGO before coming forward with that proposal, Madam Speaker? \nMadam Speaker, we need to bear in mind that NGOs are essential in dealing with such \nmatters as this subject is extremely sensitive and we know how reluctant people are to go to \ngovernment services to benefit such facilities.  \nTo conclude, Madam Speaker, like I said earlier, the drug problem has three axes \nnamely: harm reduction, demand reduction and supply reduction, and right now, we are \ntrying to place all these three components under one umbrella. Like I said, let us give time to \ntime and see whether this will work out. Le fléau de la drogue ne date pas d’hier. \nAn hon. Member : … ti ena dizan pou sa… \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Dizan ! \nMr Lesjongard : Le gouvernement précédent avait pris le taureau par les cornes… \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member : Taureau sa? \nAn hon. Member: Ki li pe koze do! \nMs Anquetil : N’importe quoi ! \nMr Bhagwan: To kone to pe koz manti! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard : … avec une commission d’enquête sur la drogue ; cela c’est un. \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member : … seconde commission ! \nDeuxième, les amendements à la Dangerous Drugs Act. Maintenant c’est au tour du ce \ngouvernement de maintenir la cadence.  \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Maintenir la cadence! \nMr Lesjongard: Voire, d'essayer de faire mieux, Madame la présidente. Pendant… \n(Interruptions) \n\n114 \n \nSoyons sérieux ! \nPendant que nous sommes en train de débattre sur ce projet de loi, n’oubliez pas ceci, \nau même moment, il y a un jeune qui est en train de consommer de la drogue synthétique ou \nde s’injecter de la drogue dure dans ses veines. Il y a un père, une mère, une famille meurtrie \npar la perte d’un être cher emporté dans l’enfer de la drogue. Tout cela, Madame la \nprésidente, c’est pour vous dire que j’ai des doutes sérieux, aujourd’hui, sur la capacité de \ncette nouvelle institution à fournir des résultats mais je reste optimiste… \nAn hon. Member: Prophète de malheur! \nMr Jhummun: Profet maler ! \nMr Lesjongard: Je reste optimiste car cela concerne l’avenir de nos enfants. J’en ai \ndit, Madame la présidente. \nMrs Savabaddy : Pendant ce temps qu’est-ce que tu vas faire ? \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Duval mem pann reste pou ekout sa. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister of Health, please! Yes! \n(6.10 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Health and Wellness (Mr A. Bachoo): Madam Speaker, this is not \nsimply a legislation; this is a bold, historic and unparalleled step, a herculean task to reclaim \nour society, to rescue our youth and to restore public trust. We have to congratulate the \nGovernment in taking this revolutionary decision because we know everybody in the streets \nwill tell you – “enough is enough, we have had enough of it, never again can we allow this \nscourge to afflict our society and our family”. Just imagine a father who loses his son or even \nhis daughter or grandson, carrying the corpse of his young son to the cemetery or to the \ncremation ground. How must that person be feeling? And that, we witness almost every day \nin this country.  \nAnd so, this is a scourge which has to be washed out and we have to congratulate this \nGovernment. At least, it had the courage to come forward with such a legislation. We are here \ntoday to establish a National Agency for Drug Control under the direct aegis of the Prime \nMinister. I heard the Leader of the Opposition stating that this should not have been under the \nPrime Minister’s aegis. I do not understand him. There cannot be any other person, any other \ninstitution better than the head of the Executive to undertake such a work and he deserves all \nof our congratulations.  \n\n115 \n \nThis is a decisive structure, an important structure to lead the fight against drug \nepidemic that has crippled our nation for far too long. This Agency will represent a complete \noverall of our national drug response. It will strengthen our institutions, it will coordinate \nintervention with precision and compassion; ranging from education and prevention, to \ntreatment and rehabilitation, to harm reduction, social integration and supply control. At the \ncentre of this national revival, stands a man of courage, foresight and conviction, the Prime \nMinister. It cannot be any other authority better than this. Despite shouldering the \nmonumental task of running a nation which is economically and financially shattered, a \nnation which is today on its knees and rescuing these shattered finances inherited from an \nMSM-led Government, he has chosen to take the personal responsibility for the leadership of \nthis Agency. It is a mark of conviction, not convenience! \nMadam Speaker, this is what true statesmanship looks like. I salute him for it and I \nsalute the Deputy Prime Minister for the support and the contribution that he has brought to \nthis project and I know how many hours he has spent in supporting this move. \nMadam Speaker, if this new Agency represents our future, let us confront our past. The \npast is dead and buried but it is important for us to have a peep at it, to have a look at it so \nthat we can forge ahead in the future. It is a past that is marked by criminal and political \nnegligence, institutional decay and human suffering. It is a past that was shaped by the MSM-\nled Government whose record on drug is one of complete failure, a complete disaster and it \nwas a complete curse for our country. We all know how heroin flooded Mauritius in early \n1980s under the MSM-led Government and more recently, how synthetic drugs started to \ndestroy our youth since they took office in 2014. How can we forget the dark days when \nMSM goons and drug peddlers would claim from housetop that gouvernman dan nou lame. \nWe still remember that. We remember the crime that was committed in early 80s in bazar \nPort Louis where criminals were openly moving up and down the streets and claiming – \n‘nobody can touch us because Government is in our hands’.  \nWe still remember how four Members of Parliament had just – the Prime Minister \nspoke about it – been arrested abroad. The then High Commissioner of Mauritius in England \nwas arrested. Those were darkest days of our Mauritian history, the shameful acts committed \nby political nominees and potentates and goons made us bow our head in shame. \nInternationally, we had lost all our respect and credibility. The recent case of tractopelle and \ngas cylinders before the nose of the Prime Minister and Ministers and involvement of the \n\n116 \n \nfamous zanfan lakaz was disgusting; all of us know about it. It is therefore no wonder that \nsubstance misuse exploded under their watch and the numbers are undeniable. \nMadam Speaker, in 2021, 7.4% of Mauritians aged 18 to 59 reported using illicit drugs. \nToday, we have a population ranging from 55,000 to more than 100,000 of substance abusers. \nBy 2024, drug abuse had become so widespread that 37% of citizens, according to \nAfrobarometer, identified it as one of the top two national issues; second only to the cost of \nliving. The survey indicates widespread dissatisfaction with Government’s effort to combat \nthe drug crisis. 70% of citizens perceive these strategies as inadequate. The simple question \nthat we asked when they had all these facts and figures was – ‘what action had they taken?’ \nYou go to any street, either village or city or the towns, everybody knows the adda, the \ncentres, the pivoting points where drugs are sold but no action was taken because these were \nthe goons who had voted for them to bring them back to power again. That is the reason why \nthey allowed their political ambitions to go higher than the interest of the Nation and the \ninterest of the common men. \nMadam Speaker, our streets are overrun by synthetic drugs like ‘Black Mamba’ and \n‘Rambo’. They are cheap, they are potent and widely available, particularly among our youth. \nHeroin trafficking through Madagascar has surged. In 2022, heroin was linked to 40.3% of all \ndrug-related arrests. According to National Drug Observatory Report, in 2022 there were \n1,008 drug-related admissions in public hospitals. 50.1% due to synthetic drugs, 30.7% due to \nopioids. Most patients were aged 20 to 37, the backbone of our future, that is, our youth were \ninvolved in that. While young people fought for their lives, our support system collapsed. \nThis is so because a study among Mauritian male addicts published in 2022 showed that 17% \nwere able to abstain from drugs for a period of only one to three years. That is not a reflection \nof moral failure, that is a reflection of systemic abandonment. Hardly, they will get out of it \nand they go back again to it. \nWhat was the MSM Government’s response? Let me state this clearly. As soon as they \ncame to power, in December 2014, the then Minister of Health tried unsuccessfully at that \ntime to stop Methadone Programme forthwith and National Aids Secretariat was removed \nfrom the Office of the Prime Minister deliberately. That was another nail in the coffin of \nthose who are fighting against HIV and Aids and against the drugs. They dismantled \nNATReSA and just now, I heard the Leader of Opposition stating that NATReSA is being \nreplaced but NATReSA was dead and gone at that time. They had destroyed it, killed it! \n\n117 \n \n (Interruptions) \nIt is not the replacement; this law is not replacing NATReSA. NATReSA is finished, \nthey had finished it and from that time, NATReSA was eliminated till today. See the harm, \nthat calamity that has befallen the Nation and for this, they have to be condemned and never \nagain allowed to take the wheels of power. \nMadam Speaker, NATReSA was dismantled. The National Agency for Treatment and \nRehabilitation of Substance Abusers which had been the cornerstone of coordinated care and \nrehabilitation. With NATReSA gone, it left a void. And the consequences, as I said, were \ndevastating. Drug peddlers had the complete freedom to do as they liked. Just imagine, they \nwere so powerful and so strong that they could defy anybody. To such an extent that even our \ngods and goddesses in Ganga Talao were not spared! This is what they have done! \n(Interruptions) \n \nMadam Speaker, on one hand, the Labour-led Government once proudly claimed – I \nremember, we used to claim when we were in power – the Prime Minister used to say that \nour aim was to produce one graduate per house. The work of the previous government was to \nproduce at least one drug addict in every house! That is the difference between our aim and \ntheir aim! So, that is a grim and shameful legacy that they have left us with! That is their \nachievement.  \nInstead of finding solutions, they were building illusions. To deceive the world, they set \nup a Commission of Inquiry on Drugs. That was a grand display to show the world that they \nwere really concerned. The truth is that they ignored most of its recommendations. It was a \nslap on the cheek for those who claimed that they were working wonders. They publicly \ncongratulated the very people who are blamed by the commission of inquiry for the drug \nsituation in our country. We all know it!  \nUnder the MSM government, the drug problem evolved into a public health \ncatastrophe. It had a devastating impact on our HIV/AIDS response. Not to forget, in 2005, \nthe MSM-led government left the country at the height of an HIV crisis. 925 new infections \nin one year, many among prison inmates with histories of injecting drugs. But the Labour-led \nGovernment took bold, evidence-driven and internationally acclaimed actions. We \nimplemented the methadone substitution therapy.  \n\n118 \n \nI heard the Leader of the Opposition questioning the utilisation of methadone. But the \nmethadone induction and follow-up are carried according to la Protocole de la prise en \ncharge de l’usage de drogues à Maurice, validated by the Ministry of Health and Wellness in \n2023! Its elaboration was supervised by experts, including David Mété from Reunion Island. \nMethadone is the gold standard as per WHO’s recommendation. And the dosage \nrecommended – he was talking about the dosage – is 80 mg to 120 mg. So, he can say \nwhatever he wants, but we know what we have done!  \nThey introduced medical cannabis. This was introduced, I think, in 2022. As at date, \nonly six patients have been recommended and approved by Medicinal Cannabis Therapeutic \nCommittee and they are undergoing treatment. Only six!  \nThere was an amendment to the Dangerous Drugs Act in November 2022 and the Drug \nUsers Administrative Panel (DUAP) became operational. It became operational in 2024. But \nover the past months, a number of intercepted individuals for drug possessions prefer the \ncriminal justice system rather than DUAP. The DUAP needs to be revisited, and if need be, \nnecessary amendment should be brought to it.  \nI was talking about the decisions that the Labour Government had taken. So, we – \n• implemented the Methadone Substitution Therapy;  \n• introduced the Needle Exchange Programme;  \n• brought in HIV/AIDS legislation;  \n• set up the National Aids Secretariat under the Office of the Prime Minister, and \n• developed a Harm Reduction Framework that reversed the trend from 2006 to 2010. \nHIV cases among People Who Inject Drugs (PWID) dropped significantly to about \n50 per month. Up till 2014, we maintained real and true control. There was full \nvigilance.  \nBut with the MSM back in power, we saw a terrifying resurgence. In 2024, 549 new \nHIV infections were detected. A 44% increase! Among men, infections rose by 60.3%. \nAmong women, infections rose by 15%. 243 new cases were found among People Who Inject \nDrugs, with 70% identified at the point of entry in prisons. The epidemic has shifted. \n\n119 \n \nInjecting Drug Use now fuels 45% of new infection while 50% comes from heterosexual \ntransmission. This means that the virus is moving beyond high-risk groups into the \npopulation, carried by the back of unsaved behaviours stigma and reduced harm reduction \ncoverage.  \nThe Needle and Syringe Programme (NSP) and the Opioid Substitution Therapy \n(OST), once effective, are now under-resourced and under-utilised. As HIV became more \nmanageable, thanks to modern treatment, it is undetectable and, therefore, untransmittable. \nHence, there is complacency. \nAdded to that, were the devastating impact of stigma, discrimination and legal barriers, \nwith bright people leaving from services. People living with HIV are struggling with \naddiction, are forced into hiding. When they hide, the virus spreads. The addiction deepens.  \nBut, Madam Speaker, we are here, today, to change all that. The National Agency for \nDrug Control will be a coordinating powerhouse, a unifying body across Ministries and \ncommunities, institutions and NGOs, prisons and private clinics, homes and schools. It will \ncoordinate public education and prevention, demand reduction among use, rehabilitation that \nworks, harm reduction that protects, social reintegration that restores dignity, supply \nreduction that disrupts trafficking networks.  \nCritically within this agency, we will establish a dedicated HIV and AIDS Coordinating \nDivision to integrate the National HIV response with our drug policy. It will ensure \nalignment with UNAIDS 95-95-95 SDC and the Global AIDS Strategy 2021-2026. The 95-\n95-95 means 95% reduction in new HIV infections, 95% access to antiretroviral treatment \nand 95% viral suppression. It will roll out community-based testing treatment and prevention. \nThe new agency will monitor and evaluate progress in real time. It will mobilise resources \nboth nationally and internationally and drive right-based advocacy to end stigma and \ndiscrimination. \nMadam Speaker, this is not merely a Bill. It is a blueprint for national salvation. This is \na message of hope to a mother who is despaired and distressed to see her child slip into \naddiction. This agency will be your ally and your friend. To the young woman afraid to seek \nHIV testing, this agency will protect your rights. To the man behind bars, ready to rebuild his \nlife, this agency will open that door. This is the moment of redemption.  \n\n120 \n \nThis is our Government fulfilling its mission and its promise. This is the Prime Minister \nshowing once again what leadership, vision, empathy and courage can accomplish. This is \nwhat true leadership means: to lead, not to mislead; to guide, not to misguide; and to serve \nthe nation, not make the nation serve you.  \nI, again, thank the hon. Prime Minister and the hon. Deputy Prime Minister and I will \nsay, you have worked wonders. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister.  \nMrs Leu-Govind! \n(6.29 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Arts and Culture (Mrs V. Leu-Govind): Merci, Madame la \nprésidente. Ce projet de loi, Madame la présidente, représente une lueur d’espoir pour notre \nnation. Il marque une volonté sérieuse de structurer notre réponse à la crise nationale à travers \nune institution dédiée avec des objectifs bien définis.  \nMadame la présidente, dans ce projet de loi, trois mots clés ressortent et méritent toute \nnotre attention : la réintégration, la prévention et la réhabilitation. Ces trois piliers doivent \ndevenir des fondements d’une politique cohérente, humaine et efficace contre la drogue.  \nMadame la présidente, permettez-moi d’abord d’aborder clairement les différents \npoints en lien direct avec le projet de loi sur la création de la National Agency for Drug \nControl. La clause 2 (b) est un point central dans la lutte contre la drogue. Si nous ne \nréussissons pas à perturber la chaine d’approvisionnement, hélas, tout ce que nous allons \nmettre en place sous la clause 3 (b) sera en vain.  \nJe tiens donc à féliciter le ministre du Tourisme, l’honorable Richard Duval, pour \nl’initiative à venir équiper tous les bateaux de plaisance d’un Automatic Identification System. \nCeci permettra de mieux contrôler et surveiller les déplacements ainsi la chaine \nd’approvisionnement de la drogue sera fortement perturbée. \nMadame la présidente, je voudrais humblement demander à l’honorable Premier \nministre de bien vouloir modifier le First Schedule de cette loi afin d’inclure le ministre \nresponsable du tourisme dans la liste des ministres dans la Commission nationale du contrôle \ndes drogues ou utilisé sa prérogative comme lui permet, sous la clause 3 section 2(f) du bill. \n\n121 \n \nCe ministère joue un rôle important dans la lutte contre la drogue, contre l’offre de drogue \ndans notre pays car il règlemente et surveille les licences des bateaux de plaisance. \nDeuxièmement, il devrait inclure dans leur campagne aux touristes que Maurice impose une \npeine sévère pour les importateurs de drogue avec une peine maximale pouvant aller jusqu’à \nsoixante ans. \nMadame la présidente, en examinant les articles 3 à 7 de ce projet de loi, je constate que \nles trois points clés mentionnés précédemment sont traités par une division spécifique de la \nNADC. Le Conseil de control de drogue, composé de fonctionnaires et d’organismes qui \nagissent dans l’application des lois, ONG et d’organisation communautaire tels que définis \ndans l’article 9, gèreront la NADC. Il ne faut pas qu’avec une telle structure la lutte contre la \ndrogue, la réinsertion, la prévention et la réhabilitation des toxicomanes s’enlisent dans les \nprocédures administratives lourdes, ce qui empêcherait notre pays de mener à bien ce combat \ncrucial pour libérer notre jeunesse de cette menace et pour cela je fais confiance à la National \nAgency for Drug Control. \nVenons maintenant à la clause 8(1)(b) de ce projet de loi traitant de la Treatment and \nRehabilitation Services Division. Nous devrions inclure des dispositions pour faciliter les \ndémarches administratives concernant la garde des enfants dont les parents sont toxicomanes. \nUne prise en charge simplifiée par les membres proches de la famille est nécessaire afin \nd’éviter des problèmes administratifs dans des écoles et des hôpitaux ce qui soulagerait les \nparents en cours de réhabilitation et les grands-parents qui souvent s’occupent de leurs petits \nenfants abandonnés par leurs parents toxicomanes. \nLa clause 8 (1) (c) liée à la préservation doit absolument prendre compte la réalité \ndouloureuse – la prostitution infantile associée à la toxicomanie, Madame la présidente. Des \njeunes dépendants se tournent malheureusement vers cette pratique pour financer leur \naddiction. La NADC doit donc prévoir des mesures spécifiques en collaboration étroite avec \ndes ONG spécialisées pour protéger des enfants et leur offrir une alternative durable. \nToujours dans la clause 8, il faudrait donner à la Policy Research Strategy Division la \nresponsabilité de revoir les procédures concernant les allégations et charges provisoires, \nMadame la présidente. Imaginez-vous si Monsieur Peroumal Veeren avait fait des telles \ngraves allégations de financement de trafique de drogues à l’encontre d’un simple citoyen : \narrestation, pas de caution, charge provisoire, Madame la présidente ? Pour l’ex Premier \nministre, comme on dit en créole, ‘dilo lor bred sonz’. \n\n122 \n \nMadame la présidente, ce traitement différencié et injuste, doit immédiatement cesser. \nNous devons assurer une justice équitable pour tous où chaque citoyen indépendamment de \nson statut social reçoit un traitement juste et impartial. Il faut impérativement redorer le \nblason de nos institutions et je salue le courage de l’honorable Premier ministre, le Dr. \nNavinchandra Ramgoolam, qui a nommé un Commissaire de police digne de ce nom dont le \ntravail a commencé à porter ces fruits avec les récents démantèlements et des saisis de record \nde drogue dure. \nMadame la présidente, concernant la clause 8(2)(l) qui traite de la collaboration avec le \nsecteur privé, il est essential de rappeler que la réhabilitation des toxicomanes et des ex-\ndétenus doivent être sérieusement repensée. Aujourd’hui, le certificat de moralité représente \nune énorme barrière à la réinsertion sociale et professionnelle, Madame la présidente. À \nMaurice, ce certificat est exigé pour enregistrer une ONG, pour obtenir une carte de pêcheur \nprofessionnelle, pour effectuer des démarches administratives et pour trouver du travail pour \nsubvenir aux besoins de sa famille. Pourtant, étrangement ce même certificat n’est pas requis \npour être candidat aux élections législatives et devenir un membre de cet auguste Assemblée \npour gérer les biens et les fonds publics. Cette incohérence est inacceptable et profondément \ninjuste, Madame la présidente, d’où la valse des défilés des voleurs à col blanc à la FCC sans \nmenottes et en plus, petite pochette à la main jusqu’à la fin, Madame la présidente. Nous \ndevons mettre fin à cette hypocrisie flagrante ; toute personne ayant payé sa dette à la société, \nmérite une seconde chance. Je propose donc qu’après une période de 10 ans ou plus, sans \nrécidive, une grâce présidentielle automatique soit accordée sur les casiers judiciaires de ces \npersonnes. Il est injuste que cette grâce soit sélectivement accordée comme ce fut rapidement \npour le fiston de l’ancien Commissaire de police, Dip. Alors que les autres citoyens sont \ntraités autrement, cette injustice doit prendre fin. \nMadame la présidente, nous devons aussi intensifier les campagnes de sensibilisation \nauprès des jeunes en leur expliquant clairement les lourdes conséquences légales liées à \nl’implication, même indirecte, dans le trafique de drogue. Il est essentiel de faire une \ndistinction claire dans nos lois entre consommateur et trafiquant afin de mieux protéger les \nconsommateurs en leur offrant une aide adaptée plutôt qu’une sanction sévère. Par rapport à \nla clause 25, concernant la dénonciation anonyme, il est essentiel d’établir un cadre clair et \njuste. Actuellement, le mécanisme est trop souvent utilisé par les trafiquants pour éliminer \nleurs rivaux. L’ADSU doit arrêter ce system ou gro pwason manz ti pwason. De plus, \nMadame la présidente, l’ADSU doit être équipé des tests rapides de détection de drogue. Qui \n\n123 \n \nne se souvient pas de cet artiste arrêté par l’ADSU pour des faits de trafique de drogue qui a \npassé deux mois et demi en détention pour que finalement le rapport du FSL vienne dire que \nc’était de la nourriture pour poisson ? Madame la présidente, deux mois et demi en détention \nexposé à la drogue, au VIH, pour une simple nourriture de poisson, c’est très grave, Madame \nla présidente.  \nMadame la présidente, le lien entre la toxicomanie, la prostitution et la propagation du \nVIH est aussi très préoccupant. Je suis ravie de voir qu’il y aura au sein de la NADC un VIH \nand AIDS Prevention and Care Coordination Division avec l’intégration des programmes \nspécifiques : réduction des risques. Les mesures et les campagnes permettront à réduire \nsignificativement la transmission du VIH parmi les toxicomanes.  \nJe vais dire ce que le leader de l’opposition n’a pas eu le guts pour dire, concernant la \nclause 27 de ce projet de loi qui propose des amendements au Dangerous Drug Act. Il est \naussi crucial d’amender le First Schedule afin de retirer le cannabis de la liste des drogues \ndangereuses, Madame la présidente. Cette recommandation est en parfait cohérence avec la \ndécision historique prise en 2020 par la Commission des stupéfiants des Nations Unies qui a \nvoté en faveur du retrait du cannabis du quatrième Schedule de la Convention de 1961. \nReconnaissant ainsi ces usages médicaux, plusieurs pays ont déjà emboité le pas, pourquoi \npas Maurice ?  \nCes pays ont compris que le cannabis ne présente pas le même niveau de dangerosité \nque la drogue de synthèse. À Maurice, nous faisons face à des décès liés aux drogues \nsynthétiques alors même qu’aucune donnée ne signale un seul cas de décès par overdose de \ncannabis. \nIl est donc temps de concentrer nos ressources et nos efforts là où l’urgence sanitaire est \nréelle et de reconsidérer sérieusement de mettre fin à la criminalisation excessive de nos \njeunes qui consomment du cannabis. \nMadame la présidente, rappelons-nous que la drogue n’est plus seulement un problème \nisolé mais bien une pandémie qui nous concerne tous directement ou indirectement. Tant que \nnos infrastructures sportives, nos centres de jeunesse et nos espaces culturels resteront peu \nfréquentés et sans vie comme les a laissés le gouvernement MSM. Le problème de la drogue \ncontinuera à s’aggraver. \n Il ne faut pas oublier que nos artistes locaux mènent un combat contre la prolification \nde la drogue depuis des décennies et font un gros travail de sensibilisation et de prévention. À \n\n124 \n \ntravers leurs chansons, slam, l’art entre autres, il faut leur donner une plate-forme et \nbeaucoup plus de ressources et des moyens pour s’exprimer.  \nPour conclure, Madame la présidente, je fais un appel aux honorables membres d’agir \nensemble. Seule la volonté, la solidarité parviendront à surmonter ce fléau national. \nJe vous remercie, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Merci! Hon. Minister, Mr Pentiah! \nWe try and keep the time, please.  \n(6.43 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms (Mr L. Pentiah): Yes, \nI will try very hard and I shall be guided by yourself.  \nMadam Speaker, at the outset, I am perplexed as to whether I should follow what I have \nto say or respond to the Leader of the Opposition first but I shall be patient. \nMadam Speaker, today marks a watershed moment in our nation’s fight against the \nscourge of drugs that has plagued our society for far too long. As a member of this august \nAssembly, as the Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms, as a father and a \ncitizen of this country who believes deeply in our nation’ potential, I stand before you with \nprofound sorrow but renewed hope.  \nOur country is facing an unprecedented drug scourge which is destroying the lives of \nthousands of youngsters who fall prey to these marchands de la mort. Such an alarming \nsituation is unparalleled and indeed very bold initiatives are warranted to combat this evil. \nTherefore, as I make my humble contribution to the debate on the National Agency for Drug \nControl Bill, I do so with full weight of our government’s mandate; a mandate written in the \nquiet suffering of parents, watching their children disappear into addiction, in the frustrated \ndedication of police officers whose arrests led to nowhere, in the fading dreams of young \npeople who deserve better protection from this scourge from a more responsible government.  \nMadam Speaker, this is not an instance of coup de tête. We go back to our Manifeste \nitself. If I may, Madam Speaker, refer to page 56 of our Manifeste and that, Madam Speaker, \nwas not drawn or written; it was calculated from the sufferings of people we have witnessed \nand listened to and were very alert. We write, at page 56 – \n\n125 \n \n« Aucun Mauricien ne dira qu’il y a moins de drogue dans le pays depuis l’accession au \npouvoir du présent régime. Aujourd’hui la consommation de drogue s’est répandue \ndans tous les coins et recoins du pays. Cette situation a selon de nombreux observateurs \naussi occasionné une recrudescence des vols et autres crimes dans le pays. \nLe combat contre le trafic et la consommation des drogues sera une des grandes \npriorités de notre gouvernement. Il faut absolument mettre fin à la souffrance des \nfamilles et de la société en général. Ce combat sans relâche sera accompagné d’une \npolitique d’aide à l’élimination de la dépendance sur les drogues néfastes à la santé de \nnos jeunes et à leur avenir. » \nMadam Speaker, we started there and then, while we started our fight against an \nirresponsible government taking our youth to the dead end with this evil of drugs. We did not \nstop there; we go even further. Our Government Programme presented by the President of \nthis country, His Excellency spoke lengthily and he went to page 28, Paragraph 56, where he \nmentioned in clear lines the following words, Madam Speaker – \n“The fight against drug trafficking and use will be one of the major priorities of \nGovernment. Additional resources will be provided to the Police to increase its capacity \nto deal more efficiently with drug trafficking and related issues.  \nGovernment will adopt bold measures to end the suffering of families and society in \ngeneral, as a result of the significant increases in drug trafficking over the last few years \nand the breakdown in law and order.” \nMadam Speaker, therefore, what the hon. Prime Minister has presented to this august \nAssembly, to the House, is not a surprise in any way. It is something that this government has \nthe solemn duty to answer to the needs of our youth, our future, the suffering families and the \npeople together in this battle, in this fight.  \nMadam Speaker, the recent electoral landslide victory that drew this government to \npower was in many ways a referendum on the failure to protect our citizens from the scourge \nof drugs. While the previous government commissioned enquiries and produced reports \nincluding the notable Commission of Enquiry on Drugs, the harsh reality is that most \nrecommendations gathered dust on shelves while our communities, our families, our children \ncontinued to suffer.  \nMadam Speaker, this pattern of neglect, this pattern of inaction, this pattern of a lack of \nwill to do something good for our children, I almost think it is deliberate on the part on those \n\n126 \n \nwho were responsible. Had it not been deliberate, then how can we explain, Madam Speaker, \nthe sudden discontinuation of a system which was working as mentioned by the Leader of the \nOpposition himself – NATReSA? \nOvernight, that whole institution was closed down, overnight! There was nowhere for \nour children, our youth, the people suffering from drug abuse to go. They were left dismayed; \nthey were left without help but, then again, was that also deliberate, in the hands of \nresponsible people because had those people addicted to drug had nowhere to go, who they \nwould turn to? Supply and demand! The higher the demand, the better the supply. Did we not \nwitness this as well? We have heard many a times from hon. Anil Bachoo. We have heard \nhow from Veeren Peroumal to Franklin to tractopelle, to marsan bredsonz and what so, to \nmention.  \nThese people in their turn, in their guts, thought they were fighting against drugs. What \ndid they do? At the end of the fight, the people of this nation thought they had some hope \nwhen there was the Striking Team, when they had a group of people identified by the then \nPrime Minister as the group chosen to fight against drugs. But what happened then? There \nwas planting, organised allegations and mistreatment.  I have one thing to say to the \ngentleman – I shall not take his name – who was responsible of that team: ‘my dear friend, \nyou also have hope because this Government is acting responsibly. The child arrested in \nMontagne Blanche with possession will not be treated as a vulgar offender of the law. He will \nbe given his chance to be rehabilitated through this law. He will be given his chance to be \nreinserted through this law. He will be given his chance to be reaccepted by the society \nthrough this law!’ \nMadam Speaker, allow me, please, to refer to the experience I have gathered at the \nbench. I am happy to see comrade Lauthan amongst us. I call him ‘comrade’ because he \nknows very well that we go a long way. I am so pleased that our hon. Prime Minister and hon. \nDeputy Prime Minister have chosen you, Sir, to lead us in the right way together with your \ncolleagues. I knocked at his door so many times when I was a magistrate. I begged for his \nsupport and his guidance when I was a magistrate. I was amongst the few magistrates, and I \ncan say it loud and clear, Madam Speaker, who sent few people in custody with addiction \nproblems. Most of the times, I knocked at the door of my comrade, Mr Lauthan. I requested \nhim to guide me on how to help these people. Briefly my friend, hon. Anil Bachoo, \nmentioned how difficult it is for a parent to carry someone who has passed away. \n\n127 \n \nMadam Speaker, there was a homicide at Ruisseau du Pouce a while ago. I was sitting \nat the bench. A lady came for soliciting for the eighth time. Together with her, there was \nanother young girl and two men. It so happened that the young girl was the daughter of this \nlady, who was also working on the street. It so happened that the man next to her was her \nseventh concubin who was involved in that homicide, and the other young man was her son. \nMadam Speaker, all this was related to drugs. I was inclined to find a person soliciting for the \neighth time to send her into custodial sentence. But I did not. Instead, I went to visit where \nshe was living. She was living in Karo Kalyptus. I went there wearing a pair of jeans and a \ncap just to see the conditions she was living in. I came back and I contacted my friend for \nrehab. I also contacted the church for Community Service Order (CSO). I did not send the \nperson to jail. \nMadam speaker, there are so many examples where sufferings prevail. There is this \nperson, Madam Speaker, who stole the rice from the bal diri qu’on a à la maison quand on \nfait nos courses. He took the rice out of the bag and he sold it to buy himself drugs. He \nreplaced it with pebbles and rock sand. Then, he covered that with some of the rice. Imagine \nthe dismay of the mother when she went to cook the rice, and she found that! Worst of all, \nthis person lives in our constituency. The father came to see me and was he crying so much. \nHe wanted to get the son out on bail as he was the only son of the family. He sold his \nmother’s jewellery, which she possessed when she was married to the father. He went to steal \nnext door. He was then forecited for theft.  \nIn this background, against these calamities, this Government is taking is such a \nresponsibility. Yet, the hon. Leader of the Opposition stands here lecturing what to do and \nwhat not to do with the law! I was sitting here, patiently waiting, kan li pou dir kouma met \ntiyo CWA! I was waiting, Madam Speaker, that he would say something about his expertise of \nbeing an engineer and explain to us why is there a mess at the Ministry of Energy and Public \nUtilities! Instead, he lectures us on something that he does not even understand! For the past \nten years that he has been sitting in government, should he have understood the miseries of \nthe families, of the kids, of the society, he should have opened his mouth to the then Prime \nMinister and said to him, tempête dans un verre d’eau, your Minister is saying ferm \nNATReSA! Your Minister is talking rubbish because he is inclined to send people suffering \nfrom drugs to Brown Sequard Hospital, treating them as mad people! He should have said ‘let \nus open a centre better equipped to rehabilitate these people!’ \n\n128 \n \nMadam Speaker, you and I come from the same background. We are lawyers. We know \nthat the philosophy/principle of jurisprudence has taught us about retribution from ages ago. \nWe then moved into rehabilitation. Some jurisdictions have gone into restitution already. I \npray that our jurisdiction goes further into redemption. These three hours will dictate the \nfuture of the young, of our people, of the future of our country, in the capable hands of the \ncompetent people who have spent a lifetime fighting against the evil side of drug abuse. \nAllow me, Madam Speaker. Mr Lauthan is someone who does not see a person abusing \ndrugs; he saw a son suffering. He did not see a person to be sent into custody; he saw a father \nin need of help to take care of his family. In his own capacity, within his own means, he \ncarried on a battle together with a team. If I say it is only him, it will not be just. You know I \nam very sharp, but I am just. Mr Lauthan, you and your team fought for a battle by \nyourselves. \nMadam Speaker: Address me, please! \nMr Pentiah: I am, Madam Speaker, pleased to be part of a Government who is \nstanding united for the welfare of our children, our country, our future, to give support to \nsuch competent people, to provide policy decisions, to provide legal framework to ensure that \nthere is a one stop shop somewhere. I do not know which part of the law the hon. Leader of \nthe Opposition read to say that the NADC is going to substitute itself to the Police or the \nMRA. I do not know which part of the law he misread or if it is because he has the virus of \nthe previous government, he deliberately, once more, misread and misdid everything. Should \nhe have taken the care to read plain English; this is one of the pieces of law, which I said to \nthe AG earlier on, is well drafted, sharp, clean, clear and easy to apply. \nThis is a good piece of drafting to make law and legal provisions available to those in \nneed. This piece of law is going to be a symbol in itself to provide our country with hope for \nthe future, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker, in line with our manifest, in line with our programme with at heart the \nfuture of our youth, the welfare of our country and our incessant fight against the evil of drug, \nwe stand united and we vouch for this Bill. I thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much. Ms Collet! \n(7.00 p.m.) \n\n129 \n \nMs M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) : Merci beaucoup, Madame la \nprésidente. A bridge to the future, que la République de Maurice soit à nouveau la \nRépublique de Maurice. Nous avons tous ce souhait est nou pe met serye.  \nMadame la présidente, imaginez un futur où chaque citoyen, où des jeunes des quartiers \nanimés aux parents et grands-parents dévoués vivent dans une communauté protégée des \ndésordres et des ravages des drogues avec des autorités publiques, des ONG est une société \ncivile activement engagés à la coordination, de bonne foi, entre eux avec une gouvernance \nexemplaire. Imaginez ! Un futur où les vies ne sont plus définies par les dépendances mais \npar des opportunités, de empowerment, coming clean, staying clean dans une société saine. \nConsommons des fruits et des légumes et non les drogues illicites. Ce rêve bien que lointain \npour certains, pourrait devenir une réalité grâce à l’introduction du projet de loi sur l’Agence \nnationale de contrôle des drogues. En version raccourcie, la NADC.  \nIl est clair que parmi les grandes priorités du gouvernement actuel, comme annoncé \ndans le Programme gouvernemental de 2025-2029, l’une des priorités majeures de ce \ngouvernement est la mesure contre ce fléau national qui est le trafic, usage et l’abus de \ndrogue. La drogue, Madame la présidente, est défini dans ce projet de loi comme étant une \nsubstance naturelle ou synthétique, licite ou illicite. La lutte contre les drogues à travers la \nRépublique de Maurice dépasse les simples chiffres et les débats politiques. C’est une lutte \npour des vies, pour la sécurité mentale et physique pour les familles ; pour une jeunesse qui \nmérite mieux qu’un avenir brisé par-dessus des dommages psychologiques. \nPartout à travers la République, des parents pleurent leurs enfants, des quartiers voient \nleurs lumières s’éteindre et des destins prometteurs sont balayés par une dépendance \nimplacable, des hallucinations, des violences, des troubles mentaux, zanfan vinn zombi avek \nzombi. Crystal Meth est le nouveau bijou de la tentation ou Black Mamba, on croirait que \nc’est une danse, dance performance de K-POP, n’est-ce pas ? Pourquoi de tels noms de \ndrogues ? Sûrement pour expliquer leurs effets dans le corps de ceux qui en abusent. \nMadame la présidente, la septième Assemblée avec nos prédécesseurs avait \ncommandité un National Drug Control Master Plan 2019/23. À la page huit du National \nDrug Control Master Plan 2019/23, si vous me le permettez de reprendre un extrait dans \ncette Assemblée, Madame la présidente, je cite – \n“The Island of Rodrigues, being part of the Republic of Mauritius, is included in this \nMaster Plan. While it is understood that the severity of drug use and trafficking is \n\n130 \n \nlimited, relevant necessary actions as defined in the log frame will be undertaken to \nprotect health and combat drug-related crime. According to ADSU reports, cannabis is \nthe main drug used in Rodrigues. It is cultivated and distributed throughout the island. \nA few cases of use of heroin and synthetic drugs have also been reported.” \nMadame la présidente, au moment où ce plan directeur a été développé pour la période \n2019-2023, bien que l’on comprît que la gravité de la consommation et du trafic de drogue \nétait limitée, on préconisait que les actions nécessaires définies dans le cadre logique allaient \nêtre mises en œuvre pour protéger la santé et lutter contre la criminalité liée aux drogues. \nSelon les rapports de l’ADSU de l’époque, le cannabis était la principale drogue consommée \nà Rodrigues. Il était cultivé et distribué à travers l’île. Quelques cas de consommation \nd’héroïne et de drogue synthétique étaient également signalés. \nÀ la page 15 de ce plan directeur, on voit le tableau cinq affichant « Arrests for drug \noffences in Rodrigues in 2017 and 2018 ». En moyenne une soixantaine d’hommes, quatre \nfemmes et de jeunes avaient été arrêtés pour des délits liés aux drogues. Cette Assemblée \nconstaterait, Madame la présidente, que Rodrigues, longtemps vierge préservée, ressent \ndésormais le point d’une autre réalité et chaque jour, la détresse grandit. Les statistiques à ce \njour sont alarmants. Nous ne pouvons plus détourner le regard. Plusieurs villages bien \nfréquentés, des écoles plus précisément deux collèges pour le moment, et plusieurs familles \nsont touchées par les fléaux de la drogue et les conséquences directes et indirectes. Les \ndealers, les marchands des drogues s’infiltrent. La consommation et l’abus de drogue \naugmentent. Les autorités publiques, les ONG ont des difficultés de coordination soutenue \nentre eux pour lutter contre cela efficacement. Certains ONG, telle que Crac Anti-Drogue, \nfigurent comme association engagée activement dans la prévention.  \nLe soutien des psychiatres, psychologues et éducateurs dans les écoles, je pense reste \nprépondérant. J’apprécie beaucoup les films d’horreur avec zombi, Madame la présidente, \ntoutefois, moi, et je pense cette Assemblée aussi avec nos collègues, nous ne souhaitons pas \navoir des transformations en zombie dans nos îles, nous ne voulons pas de cartel contrôlant \nles marchés illégaux. Nous ne voulons pas de martin criyant ‘Polico Crapo’, quand il y a des \nlandings. Nous ne voulons pas des décès dus à des overdoses, nous ne voulons pas des \nrécidives de ceux ayant déjà été dan yenn. \nNous souhaitons protéger notre peuple et garantir la sécurité de nos familles. Le projet \nde loi sur l’Agence nationale de contrôle de drogue, Madame la présidente, incarne une \n\n131 \n \nréponse, un espoir, une main tendue à ceux qui sombrent dans le silence de la tentation de \ntrafiquer, dans la tentation de consommer les drogues et bien sûr l’addiction. Avec un \nreprésentant de Rodrigues, cette loi marque un tournant, un engagement vers une approche \nqui ne se limite pas à punir, mais cherche plutôt à guérir et à reconstruire, à prévenir, le dit \nbien ce dicton, « mieux vaut prévenir que guérir ». Et je pense, Madame la présidente, qu’il \ns’agit d’un signal fort, celui d’une société qui refuse d’abandonner ses citoyens à leur sort. \nLa NADC, sous la supervision directe du Premier ministre qui est aussi Ministre du \nRodrigues et des îles, deviendra le pilier de cette transformation dans notre société \nRodriguaise et Mauricienne. Grâce à une stratégie fondée sur la prévention, le traitement et la \nréhabilitation, elle offrira à chaque personne une chance de reprendre sa vie en main. Car \nchaque individu mérite bien plus qu’un simple verdict, il mérite de retrouver sa dignité, de \nrenouer avec l’espoir de se reconstruire dans une société qui croit en lui et nous croyons bien \nsûr en notre peuple ou ce segment du peuple qui est affecté. \nCe projet de loi créant la NADC est nécessaire, Madame la présidente, puisque la \nNADC sera l’organisme centrale chargée de la prévention et du contrôle de drogue dans la \nRépublique. La NADC aura des responsabilités élargies, avec des pouvoirs plus vastes que \nceux de l’ancienne NATReSA, c’est sûr. Et, la NADC sera gérée par un conseil. La NADC \ncertainement aura peut-être à débattre de mesures pour ou contre la dépénalisation entre \nautres. Et, je vois qu’avec la création de la NADC, l’accent est mis sur la prévention de la \nconsommation des drogues, la coordination du traitement, de la réhabilitation et de la \nréintégration sociale et des stratégies de réduction de risques pour limiter les conséquences \nsanitaires et sociales, y compris la prévention des maladies transmissibles tel le VIH Sida et \nl’hépatite C. \nToutefois, Madame la présidente, nous ne pouvons pas nous contenter d’une initiative \ninachevée. Nous devons l’adapter, la renforcer, l’améliorer pour qu’elle puisse réellement \nchanger des vies, malgré les ressources limitées, compte tenu de l’état de notre économie, et \nbien sûr, peut-être un manque d’expertise et de techniciens formés dans ces domaines. A \ntravers le monde, des programmes similaires ont connu des succès et des échecs. Certains ont \npermis une meilleure coordination et un accompagnement humain, tandis que d’autres se sont \nenlisés dans une bureaucratie pesante où on négligeait l’aspect social du combat. La \nRépublique de Maurice, elle, doit tirer des leçons de ces expériences et veiller à ce que ce \nprojet de loi soit porté par une gouvernance solide, une transparence sans faille et un \nengagement profond de la société civile. Pour que cette réforme soit véritablement efficace, il \n\n132 \n \nest essentiel de mettre en place des mécanismes de suivi accessibles à tous, de favoriser des \npartenariats internationaux et d’assurer une formation rigoureuse des professionnels qui y \nsont impliqués.  \nSurtout, nous devons faire de cette lutte un combat collectif, Madame la présidente, car \naucune loi aussi bien pensée soit-elle ne peut fonctionner sans l’implication des citoyens, des \ncommunautés, des familles ; en gros, du peuple. Nous sommes à un tournant, nous avons \nl’occasion de prouver que nous sommes capables de nous unir pour offrir à notre peuple un \navenir qui ne soit pas marqué par l’angoisse et la souffrance liée directement ou \nindirectement aux drogues. Ce projet n’est pas seulement une réponse politique, c’est un \nappel à la solidarité, un cri du cœur pour que nous ne perdions plus personne dans l’oubli. \nChaque vie compte, Madame la présidente, chaque individu mérite une seconde chance. \nEnsemble avec détermination et humanité, le peuple peut et doit être plus fort que ce fléau \nnational, et aujourd’hui, nous avons la responsabilité de faire en sorte que cette promesse \ndevienne une réalité.  \nEt pour ces raisons, Madame la présidente, au nom du peuple, j’accueille favorablement \nce projet de loi. Merci. \nMadam Speaker: Je vous remercie ! M. le ministre, Dr. Boolell ! \n(7.13 p.m.) \n The Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries (Dr. A. Boolell): Madam Speaker, I have listened very intently to all speeches, and of course, I paid \nparticular attention to the speech delivered by the hon. Prime Minister. His speech was \npoignant and very powerful and he has conveyed a message, loud and clear and the \nunderlying theme of his speech is support that we have to dispense to those who are victims \nof this scourge but we want to wage an intensive war on those who are drug traffickers. When \nI listened to the speech delivered by the hon. Prime Minister, the underlying theme and the \nmessage that has been conveyed is biopsychosocial problems and we have to address these \nproblems.  \nThis is not only the responsibility of a responsible Government but it is the \nresponsibility of the Nation and the Nation has to arise, be awake and not stop till we defeat \nthose who are killers of our children and we have to stand up, put up a common front and say \n‘no’ to those who are doing harm to our children. We have to make the difference and to \n\n133 \n \nmake the difference, the Nation has to come together. There should be no fear, there should \nbe no prejudice but as a Nation, we have to stand up. The message is not only being conveyed \nhere but it has to be heard loud and clear by one and all. I feel sorry that the Leader of the \nOpposition has chosen to make an exit. I will not say whether it is a dishonourable exit but he \nhas chosen to leave the room and more so, when we are discussing an issue that cut across \npolitical differences but of course, what had to be said had to be said. \n To a large extent, the previous Government was responsible for the proliferation of this \nscourge because of the nexus it had with the mafia. Under the previous regime, Mcmafia \nruled the waves but we are saying the tide will not rise, it will be low tide and we are going to \nbe forceful. We are going to mobilise all our resources to ward off threats from those who \nthink they can disrupt our social life. There are some people who said that yet, another Bill. \nNo, the Bill before the House is not just another Bill; it is a Bill with broad ideas. It is a Bill \nwhich has been prepared after wide discussion at the bar of public opinion. It is a Bill which \nhas taken onboard input from all stakeholders and there are lessons and lessons have been \nlearned and drawn from the experience of the National Agency for the Treatment and \nRehabilitation of Substance Abusers. \nWe as a Government, have said it and I will reinforce what we have said. We are \nresolute and determined to weed out the worst scourge faced by a Nation. And when I look at \nthe provisions of the Bill, notwithstanding clause 4, the Commission will be chaired by the \nPrime Minister and it is the strong signals which are being conveyed. The Prime Minister is \nnot only first among the equals. Together with the Deputy Prime Minister, decisions will be \ntaken to ward off those threats and to tell those killers, those who are maiming our children \nthat we are going to make the difference and we are warning them to stay away. And we will \nsee to it, and I will come to that at later stage when I will talk on the importance and \nrelevance of the Financial Anti-Money Laundering Act. \nSo, what is the relevance of this Commission being chaired by the Prime Minister? He \nwill engage with the public through advocacy and awareness campaigns, highlighting the \nrisks of medication misuse and promoting informed healthcare choices. And the keywords \nhave been highlighted by all of us. The keywords are demand reduction and supply reduction \nand there are provisions made for the setting up of this National Drug Agency Control \nCommission but I will draw attention to 4(f) that progress will be made, will be monitored by \ndrug departments through the setting up of performance indicators and it reminds us of the \nrelevance and importance of pharmacovigilance. \n\n134 \n \nI will come to section 8(1)(a)(ii) where it is stated unequivocally that for the National \nAgency for Drug Control to attain its objectives, it shall – \n“(ii) coordinate and facilitate efforts at national level towards the implementation of the \nNational Drug Control Master Plan, the National Action Plan for HIV and AIDS and \nany other drug control strategy;” \nYes, a report has been submitted, an action plan has been submitted but if there was \nseriousness of purpose, if there was willingness on the part of the previous Government to be \naggressive, to wage war intensively against the mafia, against the drug traffickers, they would \nhave sent this action plan to the different Ministries. \nThat plan would have been cloistered. But we have given commitment that there will be \nimplementation of the action plan and the masterplan. Not only are we giving commitment, \nbut we will mobilise our resources to implement the National Drug Control Masterplan. \nThere is seriousness of purpose. The Prime Minister has seen to it that there are provisions in \nthe Bill in relation to the action plan and National Drug Control Masterplan.  \nNot only are we determined and totally committed, I expect and I hope our Forensic \nScience Laboratory will not let us down. It has all the reagents and the up-to-date equipment \nto conduct tests. I hope I do not hear of false positive test or false negative results. The lab is \nhere to serve and it has to deliver specific results. This is the relevance and importance of the \nForensic Science Laboratory. We know what happened in the past when dirty fingers \nmanipulated results. Under the previous government, anything went because of the nexus \nwith drug traffickers.  \nWe still have a parallel economy. As I have stated, we have a clear mandate to break \nthe nexus between the drug mafia and those who manipulated power to corrupt. The fight \ndoes not ignore the use of technology. We know what is happening and we have to put an end \nto it. There is payment, and payment is being done with crypto currency to launder money. \nThis is how payment is being effected! This is why, we, as a government, are resolute in our \nfight to wage war on drug traffickers. We are determined and we have the political will. This \nis the will of the l’Alliance du Changement. As we say, the only factor in life which remains \nconstant is change. There will be fundamental change in relation to the war that we are \nwaging on drug traffickers.  \n\n135 \n \nThis parallel economy, Madam Speaker, has flourished with the complicity and \nduplicity of the MSM regime. Why did the former Prime Minister fail to depose before the \nCommission of Inquiry, chaired former Justice Lam Shang Leen? I deposed as a responsible \npolitician and spoke fearlessly because you have to put the safety of our kids and of our \npeople first. They are our best assets. Findings of the report were damning against the MSM \nMPs and lawyers close to them. This has been stated and canvassed fully, and I will not come \nback to it. But let me say, unfortunately, the previous government did not learn any lessons.  \nI am not going to highlight what my good friend, hon. Bachoo, has stated in relation to \nthe famous rave party during the peak of COVID in a chassé in the vicinity of Ganga Talao. \nThis was a scandal of epic proportion. Drugs were freely circulated in the vicinity of Ganga \nTalao!  \nMadam Speaker, I mentioned earlier, FIAMLA prevents drugs’ money from being \nrinsed, from being dried and from being spin-dried. But we have to follow the trail and we \nhave to beat the traffickers who are laundering dirty money. As I have stated earlier, are you \nsurprised that payment is made in crypto currency? Can the trail be followed? Yes! Leering \nto obscure, the origin will fail this time. Sharing of intelligence to uncover hidden \nconnections and unravel the entire money laundering network is inevitable, as I say, because \nwe have the will and we will do it, and because we have reliable friends. We have traditional \npartners who are willing to be together with us because our fight is their fight. We have to see \nto it that we deliver on promises made.  \nUnlike the previous government, we are not looking into the eyes for certificate of \nmerits to be issued. This is over! First, we have to know who the client is and we have to \nunderstand the very meaning of diligence. The narco-traffickers, as I have said, are still there, \nalthough some are on the run and operate undercover. But there is still, as I have said, an \ninherent fear. I know of teachers who shake in their boots and turn a blind eye. Yet, they have \nto put their best endeavour to protect our kids. Today, it is sad when you see and you hear \nyoung kids who are drugs pushers, walking with bundles of paper money. I have seen it. \nMadam Speaker, as I have said, we are not going to retreat nor surrender whether the \nwar will be fought inland or at sea. The National Parks Conservation Service, the Forestry \nDivision, together with Customs, CCID, ADSU, National Coast Guard and MRA, have to act \ncollectively to wage war on drug barons. We have to be mindful of transshipment at sea. I \n\n136 \n \nhave impressed upon Ministers when I attended a meeting in Reunion Island, that we should \nhave a strong regional plan for control and monitoring of transshipment of fish and drugs. \nSometimes, drugs are hidden in the bellies of fish.  \nMonitoring, close surveillance and use of helicopters, drones and AI is becoming a \ncommon feature. Copernicus and other satellite agencies can see with precision the location \nof fish trawlers sometimes involved in drug trafficking, even if control, monitoring and \nsurveillance is switched off. The Canal of Mozambique, Madam Speaker, is known for all \nillegal transaction, Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) transshipment and also of \ndrugs.  \nMadam Speaker, we have a vast Exclusive Economic Zone. If we compute the total \nEEZ of Comoros, Mauritius, Madagascar and Seychelles, it is about 10% of the Indian \nOcean, that is, 7.3 billion km2. It is not easy to exercise proper control, monitoring and \nsurveillance. But with the support of the EU and the French Government, surveillance \nprogramme to combat IUU and drug trafficking is becoming effective. Our National Coast \nGuard has to be reinforced and the QUAD and the French Army based in Reunion certainly \nare strong allies. India tilts the balance with information that it relays to us.  \nMadam Speaker, the sentences have to be harsh and the specialised Police Force has to \nundergo proper training. But the Police has to make sure that those who are on conditional \nbail do not run drug reigns. Hardcore traffickers are likely to be on conditional bail. However, \nthere are cases of alleged traffickers on bail.  \nMadam Speaker, let me say a word in relation to whistleblowers. There are provisions \nin the Bill for whistleblowers to speak without fear and prejudice, to blow the whistle and say \nwhere the trafficking is going on. They need confidence. We have to make sure that the \ninformation, which is going to be relayed or conveyed or disclosed, has to be disclosed to \npeople who are reliable. As of now, there is still an element of mistrust. Who do I talk to? \nCan I trust the person? Is he or she reliable? This is the climate that we are going to introduce \nto dissipate fear, to inculcate values of standing up and to say loud and clear: ‘yes, we are not \nafraid to denounce those who are maiming and killing our children.’ We need to muster the \ncourage and say it without fear or prejudice.  \n\n137 \n \nAs I say, it is a biopsychosocial problem. First and foremost, a societal problem. There \nshould be no alienation and no stigmatisation, no child or any human being should be allowed \nto drift. It is this problem, as I say, we need to address with firmness and care. \nWe have talked of psychological support but we need to enlist the services of one and \nall. In this battle, we all have to put our best endeavour, whether we are sitting in Government \nHouse, in Parliament, in a backstreet or in Réduit, we all have to be on board, we have to \nwage war. The war has to be intensive and there is no retreat when we have to face drug \ntraffickers, Madam Speaker. \nLet me end by talking on Pharmacovigilance, the Unit which is run by Mrs \nMawlaboccus, Acting Director Pharmaceutical Services. First of all, in relation to methadone, \nas the hon. Prime Minister has stated, methadone substitution therapy was officially \nintroduced in Mauritius in November 2006 under the Labour Government as part of a broader \nharm reduction strategy to address the country’s high rate of opiate use and HIV transmission \namong people who inject drugs. After 18 years, there is a call to have a formal study because, \nwhether we like it or not, the merits of this substitute drug, far outweigh any of the demerit. \nToday, we know that it has a longer shelf life but we have to make sure that it is used \njudiciously and the person who take the drug has the potency which is relevant to the \npharmacological relevance of this drug. \nMadam Speaker, we have travelled a long way and today we have a government which \nhas won the heart, the mind and the soul of a nation and we have to live up to their \nexpectation and this is precisely what we are doing. We will not retreat whether we have to \ntake difficult measures or measures which are popular. But we will take measures to redress \nand address forcefully psycho-social problems. As a nation, we want our people to be on the \nmove and to walk without fear and prejudice. This is a battle which we are going to win and \nwin handsomely. \nThank you very much, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nHon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet! \n(7.33 p.m.) \n\n138 \n \nMr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet): Madam Speaker, \npour commencer je voudrais dire à cette vieille chachi dont je ne dirai pas le nom pour des \nraisons évidentes qui habite à Maheshwar Nagri, dans ce beau village de ma circonscription \nqui est Triolet, que nous ne vous avons pas oublié, que vos cris de cœur sont en passe d’être \nentendus et qu’on va faire ce qu’il faut pour extraire votre fils de 44 ans des griffes de ce \ndémon qu’est la drogue. \nMadame la présidente, lorsque j’ai commencé mon combat contre la drogue, il y a deux \nchoses qui se sont produites. La première, j’ai vu une avalanche de messages de soutien mais \naussi d’information. Et là, je me suis demandé pourquoi ces braves gens étaient disposé à \nvenir me donner l’information alors qu’il y avait la police. À eux, I want to tell them, à partir \nde maintenant ils auront des structures qui auront les épaules bien plus larges que la mienne \npour avancer leurs doléances et je serais continuellement à leurs côtés dans cette bataille \ncontre la drogue. À mes amis qui m’avaient cautionné de ne pas m’aventurer trop \nvaillamment dans cette bataille contre la drogue, eux aussi ils avaient raison. On le sait tous, \naller contre les barons de la drogue peut avoir des conséquences graves pour la personne qui \nmène le combat et pour sa famille. À eux, je leur dis – si on ne se décide pas à mener ce \ncombat, on finira par perdre nos enfants à ce même problème qu’est la drogue.  \nAlors, Madam Speaker, for me there is no debate about what drug is doing to this \nbeautiful country of mine. There is no doubt that drugs are being imported and also produced \nhere. C’est évident that political will to curb this problem was non-existent until we came into \npower. Madam Speaker, we have the political will and we will give ourselves everything that \nis needed to take our country back from the claws of death. I thank the Prime Minister for \ncoming up with this Bill within six months of taking control of the business of this country. \nDear comrades, what haven’t we debated, seen and done in the past? We had the \nNATReSA that did its job in its time. We have had awareness programmes, we have had a \nrehabilitation programmes, we have the Methadone Distribution Programme that was brought \nin to address the HIV and drugs problem. We have drug repression measures. We have \nrealised that drug addicts had to be treated as victims, as sick people in contrast to drug \ndealers who suck the lives of our families. We have ways and means, maybe not enough for \npreventing drugs from coming in and going out. Yet, here we are. Some are even coining us \nthe name of Zombi Island. Catastrophe is knocking at our doors and I am not afraid to say \nthat this did not start on 11 November 2024. The beast has been allowed in very long back.  \n\n139 \n \nOur people have got very simple questions. Why is it so hard to stop this problem of \ndrugs? We heard that the other day when Mr Sam Lauthan was delivering a talk in \nMorcellement St André. A gentleman in the audience asked ‘why can’t we apprehend a drug \nuser and ask him where did he buy his drugs from? And then we climb the chain to reach the \nbig boss.’ I must say Mr Lauthan give him a very diplomatic reply. But we all know that had \nit been so easy to address, to apprehend drug barons, we wouldn’t be sitting here debating \nthis Bill. How many times haven’t we heard about this refrain of ‘let’s bring capital \npunishment for the drug dealers.’ Is it going to be the solution? I don’t know.  \nWe have seen countries that have introduced or maintained capital punishment but \nhaven’t seen a great decrease in the problem of drugs. Yet, there are other countries who have \nhad better success like Singapore. I may not be the right person to dictate what we need to do \nabout this but for sure, I will fight for us to have the right people in our institutions, to make \nthe right recommendations so that we can all legislate on this matter. \nThe National Agency for Drug Control is the first step of many that will come to create \nthe appropriate structures and legal framework to help us combat the drug issue and other \nrelated problems. The issue of drugs is not only a problem of law and order, it is also a social \nissue which in my opinion is the main issue as it tears down families, it robs our very capable \nyouth of their future and stigmatise them for the rest of their lives. It is also a painful \neconomic problem, it may sound foolish but haven’t we seen bus drivers putting at risk the \nlives of their passengers, or just being immobilised in the middle of the road while they are in \ntrance under the effect of drugs.  \nHaven’t we seen people zombified on their motorbikes in broad daylight? It seems that \ndrug is not something that addicts are hiding anymore, but it is in fact about enslavement \nwhere they have no choice over what they are doing. Having no choice is not a choice but we \nhave taken the pledge of giving people a choice; be it in terms of our economy, our health or \nsocial tissue. That is why, Madam Speaker, it is urgent for us to have an Agency such as the \none we have proposed. \nWe cannot be good in one department of our lives and yet so bad in another \ndepartment. That is why it has become important for us to have a modern agency that will not \nsit as a toothless bulldog but will have the relevant powers to look at the problem with a \nholistic view, to take action in all directions that are required to address the problem. Yes! \nWe have to provide the appropriate treatment to those who have fallen prey to the scourge of \n\n140 \n \ndrugs but we also have to lift up families affected by this. We have to give our business \ncommunity an able working population rather that just giving them as only recourse to import \npeople from Bangladesh, Nepal or Madagascar.  \nMadam Speaker, this law does not decriminalise any form of drug use or practice; it is \nnot meant for that. It does better. It sets up the appropriate structures to consider this problem. \nThe National Drug Control Commission will be chaired by the Prime Minister and will also \nbe comprised of the Deputy Prime Minister and many other ministers; all of them at the apex \nof our executive. If this does not show how important we consider our fight against drug in \nMauritius, I don’t know what will.  \nThis Bill also provides for the setting up of the Drug Control Board and I have no doubt \nthat the most able people will be appointed to lead this organisation. The expectations of the \npopulation and all of us sitting in this august Assembly, are very high. The two organisations \nbeing set up will have the very difficult task of finding a solution to the new forms of drugs \nlike fentanyl which has crippled the world and is now infecting our society. This is a very \nserious problem. The more so as these new forms of drugs have immediately crippled us in \nthree ways. \nFirstly, they are available at such low prices that even a child attending a primary \nschool can acquire it with his pocket money, let alone a working adult wasting his hard-\nearned money on a fleeting high.  \nSecondly, these new drugs also mean that measures like legalising recreational \ncannabis would be of no use as the users of these synthetic drugs cannot use cannabis as a \nsubstitute. The reverse maybe true but the price at which synthetic drugs are available will \nnot serve any purpose if we just legalise cannabis. From consultations I have had, I \nunderstand that there are also no synthetic substitutes for the new synthetic drugs and doctors \ncan only treat symptoms. They are treating headaches, nausea and sleep disorders. \nThirdly, the new synthetic drugs can cause sudden death even for a first-time user. \nNowadays, synthetic drugs abusers who are administered methadone treatment are doubling \nup because they are also taking synthetic drugs.  \nThere you are – to the two bodies we are setting up, there lies your problem. The \nproblem is a big one and is dynamic. This conclusion seems to echo that we do not have the \nsolution for drug abusers. Indeed, we do not have a magic wand and there lies the problem.  \n\n141 \n \nMais, on ne va pas rester les bras croisés. S’il y a une chose et qu’une seule qu’on \npourrait réaliser jusqu’à la fin de ce mandat, ce serait de redonner le sourire à ces familles \nperdues à la drogue. \nPour conclure, Madame la président, je sais que cette famille de Pointe-aux-Piments \nqui, ayant perdu un neveu a la drogue, nous écoute ce soir. Cette famille, unanimement, \nn’avait qu’une demande à nous formuler ; celle de casser les reins des barons de la drogue. À \neux, je voudrais leurs dire, voici le premier pas.  \nMadame la présidente, j’en ai terminé.   \nMadam Speaker: Merci beaucoup! Hon. Ms. Babooram! \nThis will be the last speech before we break.  \n(8.46 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare (Ms A. Babooram): \nMadam Speaker, it is with a deep sense of responsibility but also with great hope that I rise \ntoday to contribute to the debate on the National Agency for Drug Control Bill.  \nThis Bill, if implemented with sincerity and seriousness that it deserves, will be \nremembered as a pivotal moment in our nation’s fight against one of the most corrosive \nplagues of our society – drug abuse and unchecked empire of illicit trafficking.  \nAllow me first, Madam Speaker, to congratulate the hon. Prime Minister and the hon. \nDeputy Prime Minister for having kept their promises which they made during the elections. \nThe establishment of a National Drug Agency is not just a political achievement; it is a moral \nand historical necessity. It shows that this government is not content to rule for two days’ \napplause but is determined to leave a legacy, to build a safe and just future for our emerging \ngenerations. This is leadership; this is vision! \nMadam Speaker, a socialist government worthy of that name must strive for \ninclusiveness, justice and equity. These are not just ideological pillars; they are the \nfoundation of a healthy society but let us not forget the recent past. The previous government \nwhich paraded itself as ‘Movement Socialiste Militant’ did the exact opposite. Under its \nwatch, the fabric of society frayed; thousands of our children were marginalised. I think we \ncannot forget and we cannot forgive them for having introduced the 5-credit, imposed on our \nchildren, thus, marginalising thousands of them. They found themselves outside the \neducational system; a policy that punished the poor, the underprivileged, the voiceless. These \n\n142 \n \nchildren were denied their basic rights to dream and what happened, Madam Speaker? How \ndo we expect these children, these young souls to earn a living?  \nThey could not even rise up the social ladder. The doors of opportunity were slammed \nshut in their faces. The cost of living soared and you will see that they created les \ncirconstances propices pour le trafic de drogue. En fin de compte, ils ont créé une clientèle \npour la drogue et la politique de petit copinage, favoritism, nepotism flourished, while \nordinary citizens were struggling to feed their families. Crime rates went up. Our prisons \nalready creaking under pressure became overpopulated and as insecurity gripped our \ncommunities, a more insidious danger crept in – synthetic drugs! \nIl suffit aujourd’hui d’aller sur les réseaux sociaux pour voir des vidéos où les gens \nsont comme des zombies, and the zombie-like demeanour of those who fell prey to these \npoisons is something that we cannot ignore. Instead of showing compassion, many of those \nwho use social media are sharing these videos. Are we to condemn these people or are we to \ntreat them to give them the medical treatment that they need? \nYoung people stripped of hope, wandering like shadows, victims of a system that failed \nthem while drug barons grew richer, more powerful and more untouchable. Madam Speaker, \nhow can we call this a democracy? How could we call this a democracy? In a democracy, a \ngovernment is supposed to make law for its people. But they made law, such as the five \ncredits, to impose that on the children so that they could be marginalised and finally become \nclients for drugs.  \nA democracy is meant to be for the people, not for the profiteers. I must also raise a \npoint that I have raised repeatedly in the past: our prison system. I cannot forget how our \nprisons became a passoire for drug lords. I say this with great concern, not as a mere political \nrhetoric. I have said it before the press in the past; I have said it before the Commission of \nEnquiry on Drugs, and I saw it myself when I visited prisons while I was at the National \nPreventive Mechanism Division of the Human Rights Commission. Yet, nothing changed! \nThe same livreur de poissons seen in prisons was also seen on the Wakashio which, let \nus not forget, sank in deeply suspicious circumstances. Are we to keep ignoring such \ncoincidences? What about the tragic and unexplained death of a Police Constable arrested \nwith drugs at the airport and found dead at the Moka Detention Centre? I would like to, at \nthis stage, quote late Mr Lassemillante, who was the Deputy Chairperson of the National \n\n143 \n \nPreventive Mechanism Division, in his report, on 31 October 2016. The extracts are as \nfollows – \n“The detainee was posted in Cell No. 14 where the CCTV camera did not work. During \nmy visit, it was reported that the detainee hanged himself by using a towel attached to a \ntap situated at 3ft above ground level. This death is suspect. It is difficult for a man of \nmedium height to hang himself with an object situated at merely 3ft from ground level. \nWe noted that in some cells of the detention centre, the CCTV camera system was \nworking. Yet, the accused, in an important drugs importation case, is detained in one of \nthe cells which cannot be supervised by the CCTV camera.”  \nThis is not just suspicious; this is outrageous! How many more lives must be lost? How \nmany more parents must watch helplessly as their children fall into addiction while those \nprofiting from it dine in luxury. This is why, Madam Speaker, this Bill is more than just a \nlegal framework. It is a moral reckoning. I truly trust that the National Agency for Drug \nControl will be the institution we need to attack this scourge from its roots. We cannot afford \nto leave the future of our youth in the hands of mafias, cartels or corrupt networks. Let us \nempower this agency to act independently without fear or favour. \nLet it operate free from political interference. Let it have the resources and the mandate \nto break down the criminal empires that have long held this country hostage. Today, Madam \nSpeaker, we have something rare and powerful. We have hope. Hope for a society where no \nchild is left behind. Hope for a future where prisons are not schools of crime, but institutions \nof reform. Hope for a nation where drug dealers are in jail, and not in government contracts. \nHope for a Mauritius that belongs to its people again.  \nLet us not squander this opportunity. Let us pass this Bill with a seriousness and the \nunity it deserves. Let history record that we stood on the right side, that when the tides turned, \nwe chose justice, we chose life and we chose our children. Thank you, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Members, I suspend the Sitting for one hour! \nAt 7.58 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 9.05 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated! Hon. Mr Baboolall! \n(9.06 p.m.) \n\n144 \n \nMr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE): Thank you, \nMadam Speaker. The National Agency for Drug Control Bill, as already stated by the hon. \nPrime Minister, will be of upmost importance to Mauritius and the generations to come.  \nMadam Speaker, the Government Programme made it clear that the fight against drug \ntrafficking and use will be one of the major priorities, and that the Government will set up the \nNational Drug Policy Monitoring and Coordination Agency that will bring together various \npublic bodies that will combat drug trafficking, provide rehabilitation and support families of \nvictims of drug abuse. \nMadam Speaker, it was also mentioned that the legal provisions in respect of \ntrafficking, consumption and treatment of drug addicts will be reviewed to cater inter alia for \ndifferentiated treatment of traffickers and consumers. Madam Speaker, if we have the NADC \nbefore this august Assembly today, it means that this Government means business. Under the \nleadership of the hon. Prime Minister and hon. Deputy Prime Minister, the whole population \ncan see today that the reconstruction of our nation is underway. They are working tirelessly \nfor Mauritius to be Mauritius again. \nMadam Speaker, 2014 to 2024 will always be remembered by generations to come that \nMauritius had a fake government. It was a dark period where we have seen the drug \nproliferation. How can we forget the famous tractopelle? How can we forget the gas \ncylinders full of drugs? How can we forget the Wakashio saga and the presence of marsan \npwason on it? How can we forget the rave party and minis serf? How can we forget the \nrecord recovery of drugs at Pointe aux Canonniers? \nMadam Speaker, the previous government has not been a responsible government when \nit came to drug control and money laundering. Instead, what can be seen today is that \nMauritius has been heavily affected. A lot of families are suffering and the victims are left to \nthemselves. It is very sad when we see how the youngsters have been victims of synthetic \ndrugs and no measures were taken by the Pinokio’s government. \nMadam Speaker, even the previous government set up the Commission of Enquiry on \nDrug Trafficking in 2018, what was the outcome? To the nation’s astonishment, members \nclose to the MSM party were mentioned in the report. Even Pinokio’s name was mentioned! \nThe pragmatic recommendations were never adopted nor any laws were amended to stop the \nproliferation of drugs nor anything was done for the victims. \n\n145 \n \nMadam Speaker, the previous government also did a National Drug Control Masterplan \n2019-2023. But again, nothing was done! Why? Because they have always been antipatriotic. \nThey have never cared for the children and citizens of this country. The only objective for \nthem was to steal the wealth of this country. If we see the whole picture, it can be said that \ninstead of condoning the drug business, they had an invisible hand supporting it to destroy the \nnew generations to come because for them, it was money and power at all cost.  \nPinokio thought of himself as undefeatable as money can buy everything. Their \nStriking Team was ready to terrify anyone raising their voice against the then government. \nBut, Madam Speaker, he forgot, as rightly pointed out by the hon. Deputy Prime Minister, \nlepep admirab was watching. The people knew what they had to do to get rid of Pinokio’s \nfake government on 10 November 2024. \nMadam Speaker, the NADC will be the apex body for addressing drug use prevention \nand drug control issues in Mauritius. It contains 28 sections and englobes almost everything \nthat Mauritius needs to be able to look forward and leave a legacy for the generations to \ncome. \nMadam Speaker, the NADC will be administered and managed by the Drug Control \nBoard comprising of a chairperson and at least 20 members including representatives from \ndifferent ministries, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Prisons, Secretary-\nGeneral of the National Social Inclusion Foundation and members from the civil society \nhaving the responsibility to make policy decisions. \nMadam Speaker, the Board may set up such committees as it deems necessary to assist \nit in the discharge of its function in the fight against drug abuse. There will be a committee \nfor each division such as Policy, Research and Strategy Division, Treatment and \nRehabilitation Services Division, Prevention and Public Awareness Division, and HIV and \nAIDS Prevention and Care Coordination Division and a Supply Reduction Coordination \nDivision. There will also be a Chief Executive Officer who will be the head of NADC and \nwill be responsible for the control and management of the day-to-day business and operation \nof the NADC. \nMadam Speaker, this inclusive approach where all stakeholders will join hands \ntogether, will no doubt fulfil the very purpose of the NADC. It will be a golden opportunity \nand a unique chance to rethink the drug policy and repair the damages caused by the previous \ngovernment. Madam Speaker, the NADC will no doubt find solutions for the victim of \n\n146 \n \nsubstance abuse. They should not be looked at as only victims but they should be considered \nas patients suffering from a form of sickness and whose places are not certainly in prison but \nin rehabilitation centres and have to be taken care by health specialists. \nMadam Speaker, the dispensing of methadone at local police stations as per the \nmethadone programme has to be revisited. Many of the victims are often left by themselves, \nabandoned by the family and do not receive psychosocial help and support to get out of the \ndrug web. I have no doubt that the NADC will come with the appropriate solutions for the \nvictims. \nMadam Speaker, every board member will have to take oath before assuming, \nfunctioning according to section 23 and they have to maintain confidentiality on any matter, \naccording to section 24. Section 25 also gives protection to whistleblowers and there are \nsevere penalties if there are victimisation or retaliation. All safeguards are present for the \nNADC to work perfectly. Madam Speaker, section 27 amends the Dangerous Drugs Act and \ngives the NADC powers to rehabilitate victims where the offender is willing to undergo \ntherapy, to overcome his addictive behaviours to drug. This as well will enable the NADC to \nplay it a pivotal role in the fight against drug abuse.  \nMadam Speaker, the war on drug abuse will not be easy. Once the NADC has been set \nup, being at the apex and deciding on policy decisions, we are sure that representation will be \nmade to evaluate the debate in relation to cannabis. Madam Speaker, it will be for the NADC \nto decide whether to prevent the deadly uncontrollable proliferation of synthetic drug, \ncannabis use will be seen the way forward or not. There has always been a raging debate \nbetween legalisation versus decriminalisation, recreational and its use for medical purposes. \nMadam Speaker, the NADC, we hope, will be able to draw the line and come with the right \npolicy decision. The NADC will have to refer to the best practices in various countries and \ncome up with the best solution in our fight against drug abuse.  \nMadam Speaker, everyone should join forces together in pursuit of the common \npurpose to have a healthier society with less crimes linked to drug abuse and protection of the \nvulnerable. \nA healthy society rests on the three fundamental pillars; the Government, the private \nsector and the civil society where each has a distinct role to play. It is also crucial to ensure \nthat there is a healthy population, capable of contributing to the sustainable economic \n\n147 \n \ndevelopment and growth of the country. This will be possible through education, poverty \nalleviation, the bonding of family values and a change in the perception of the people. \nMadam Speaker, the NADC will no doubt be the laying foundations where the \ncollaborations of the public and all the stakeholders including the law enforcement agencies \nwill enable the nation to move forward with a clear collaborative goal for the nation’s future. \nI thank you again the hon. Prime Minister and the hon. Deputy Prime Minister for bringing in \nthis Bill. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you for keeping the time, Mr Baboolall. \nMr Quirin! \n(9.15 p.m.) \nMr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière): Madame la \nprésidente, nous débattons en ce moment d’un projet de loi crucial, le National Agency for \nDrug Control Bill. Un texte de loi tant attendu car le pays est actuellement en état d’urgence \nsur le sujet de la drogue. Au risque de me répéter la situation dans le pays aujourd’hui est \ntelle que les bonnes intentions contenues dans le projet de loi ne suffisent pas. La société \ndevrait aussi avoir son mot à dire, des nombreuses ONG militent pour que Maurice emboîte \nle pas à des pays développés qui ont assoupli leurs lois sur la consommation du cannabis. \nUne question que je me pose, Madame la présidente, est-ce qu’un projet en faveur de la \ndépénalisation du cannabis aidera à combattre la dangereuse montée des drogues de synthèse \net anéantir ses effets désastreux sur notre société ? De nombreux experts en sont convaincus, \ncertains parlent même de légaliser le cannabis. À un moment où nous sommes en train de \nrepenser nos manières de lutter contre la drogue et de faire plus d’efforts pour la prévention et \nla réhabilitation, il ne faut pas laisser nos réflexes passéistes nous empêcher de prendre des \ndécisions courageuses. Qu’en pense le Gouvernement ?  \nMadame la présidente, je réitère ma demande au Gouvernement pour lancer un débat \nnational et d’organiser, si besoin est, un référendum sur la dépénalisation du cannabis. Je suis \nd’avis, Madame la présidente, que le National Agency for Drug Control Bill devrait faire \nprovision pour la décriminalisation des drogues ou, s’il y a consensus, la dépénalisation du \ncannabis. Ce projet de loi met uniquement l’accent sur la réduction de la demande, la \nprévention, la réhabilitation et la réduction des risques. L’absence de mention de la \ndécriminalisation ou de la dépénalisation peut être interprétée comme une volonté de \nmaintenir une approche répressive malgré les débats internationaux sur les bienfaits des \n\n148 \n \npolitiques plus progressistes – comme celles, par exemple, du Portugal ou de certains états \naméricains. \nCertains experts estiment qu’appliquer une politique répressive sur les consommateurs \nde drogue peut entraver leurs accès aux soins et à la réinsertion sociale. Il faut aussi, Madame \nla président, revoir le programme de la distribution de la méthadone qui de toute évidence \nn’apporte pas les résultats voulus. La méthadone qui est la base d’un produit de substitution \npour les toxicomanes, est devenue un produit d’addiction. \nActuellement, l’honorable ministre de la Santé, lui-même, l’a affirmé récemment \nenviron 8000 personnes sont sous traitement de la méthadone. Certains patients dénoncent \ndes conditions de distribution difficiles, notamment dans les postes de police et plaident pour \nune décentralisation vers des centres de santé. D’autres estiment que le traitement ne \nfonctionne pas comme prévu et qu’il faudrait revoir le protocole. De plus avec plus de 65 000 \nconsommateurs de drogues injectables et non injectables recensés ; seul 8000 bénéficient de \nla méthadone, ce qui met en lumière un manque de ressources pour répondre aux besoins. Le \nprogramme aide certains à stabiliser leur consommation mais son efficacité est entravée par \ndes problèmes logistiques et sociaux à tel point que les patients sont toujours sous traitement \naprès plusieurs années, voire 10 ans ou plus. Je souhaite donc, Madame la présidente, que \nl’Agence de contrôle et le ministère de la Santé se pencheront sur le problème et prendront en \nconsidération des alternatives, si besoin est, à la méthadone comme la buprenorphine et la \nnaltrexone.  \nLa buprénorphine réduit les symptômes de manque et a un risque de dépendance plus \nfaible, alors que la naltrexone empêche toute sensation d’euphorie en cas de rechute. Je note \négalement que même si le projet de loi prend en considération la corrélation entre drogues et \nle VIH/Sida dans le but de minimiser la transmission du VIH et de l’hépatite C, il reste \nnéanmoins centré sur la répression et le contrôle du trafic. Il faudra donc une approche de \nréduction des risques inspirée des modèles comme celui, encore une fois je le cite, du \nPortugal. L’absence de mention explicite de la décriminalisation ou de la dépénalisation \npourrait limiter l’accès aux soins pour les consommateurs de drogues, freinant ainsi les \nefforts de prévention du VIH/Sida.  \nMadame la présidente, je me pose également la question de savoir quel sera désormais \nle rôle du National Drug Secretariat et du National Aids Secretariat avec l’entrée en vigueur \n\n149 \n \nde la National Agency for Drug Control Act. Ce serait bien si le Premier ministre puisse nous \nen dire davantage lors de son summing up. \nMadame la présidente, pour revenir au National Agency for Drug Control Bill, je relève \ndes points d’attention que le gouvernement ne doit pas ignorer. Donner trop de pouvoirs à une \nseule agence sans mécanisme de contrôle fort, peut mener à des dérives bureaucratiques ou à \ndes lenteurs administratives. Il en est de même sur les moyens réels dont disposera l’agence. \nAura-t-elle les moyens humains, financiers, et techniques pour remplir sa mission ? Le projet \nde loi ne donne pas de détails concrets sur le budget – ce qui est compréhensible \nprobablement – ni sur la formation du personnel, ou les outils de suivis. Plusieurs aspects, à \nmon avis, doivent être améliorés pour rendre ce projet de loi plus complet et plus conforme \naux attentes modernes. Comme l’ambiguïté sur les mesures de réduction des risques dans les \nsections 6(f) et 6(g) du projet de loi, ces clauses ne définissent pas clairement les pratiques de \nréduction de risques acceptables comme l’échange de seringues ou les sites de consommation \nsupervisés. Cela pourrait entraîner une mise en œuvre incohérente à travers le pays.  \nDe même, Madame la présidente, le projet ne mentionne pas explicitement les droits \nfondamentaux des personnes qui consomment des drogues, tel que le droit à la santé, la non-\ndiscrimination, et la protection de la vie privée. Il est donc crucial d’inclure ces protections \npour garantir que les services soient éthiques et respectueux des droits des usagers. Si on \ns’arrête aussi à la section 8, bien que la société civile soit représentée dans le conseil \nd’administration, le projet ne précise pas comment ces représentants seront choisis, seront \nsélectionnés, ni leur influence réelle sur les décisions de l’agence. Par ailleurs, la section 16 \ndu projet de loi établit un fond de contrôle des drogues mais il manque, à mon avis, des \ndétails sur les sources de financement, les critères d’allocation, et les mécanismes de \nsurveillance de ce fond. \nIl faut également faire attention, Madame la présidente, que certaines ONG très actives \nsur le terrain depuis des années, ne soient pas marginalisées. Je propose donc, Madame la \nprésidente, un renforcement de la prévention dans écoles et les quartiers sensibles. Il faut tout \nun programme éducatif dès le primaire sur les risques liés aux drogues, adapté à l’âge. Les \ncollèges devraient être dotés de clubs anti-drogue encadrés par des jeunes leaders formés. Les \nONG et éducateurs devront animer des ateliers réguliers dans les zones à risques. Des centres \ndevront être accessibles dans chaque région de l’île avec un accompagnement médical, \npsychologique et social. Il est donc important de déstigmatiser l’usager, former la police, les \njuges, les médias et dans la foulée une formation obligatoire pour la police sur les nouvelles \n\n150 \n \napproches centrées sur l’accompagnement plutôt que la répression, mais également, \nencourager les juges à recourir à des peines alternatives comme les thérapies et les travaux \nd’intérêt général pour les consommateurs. Mais, pas de pitié pour les trafiquants ! \nCe projet, Madame la présidente, suscite de l’espoir, mais aussi des interrogations. \nAutant que j’accueille favorablement, autant je vais répéter ce que j’avais annoncé lors de \nmon intervention sur le Discours Programme. Il nous faut des moyens illimités en termes de \nressources humaines, de technologies modernes, et de l’approche à adopter pour mener à bien \nla lutte contre les trafiquants qui pullulent le pays et tuent notre jeunesse avec leur poison \nsynthétique en faisant preuve d’ingéniosité et sans doute, avec la complicité \nmalheureusement, de certaines brebis galeuses au sein de la force policière. \nMadame la présidente, les discours et les mises en garde ne servent malheureusement \npas comme effet dissuasif. Nous voyons tous les jours des chauffeurs sous l’effet de drogue, \ninconscients dans leurs véhicules qui causent des accidents. Un jeune a été trouvé en \npossession de drogue dans une école primaire. Des jeunes collégiens ont été surpris en train \nde sniffer – d’autres avant moi l’ont dit – du déodorant et d’autres produits et j’en passe. \n Le Premier ministre a révélé récemment à la Chambre que la quantité de drogues \nsaisies de novembre 2024 à mars de cette année s’élève à plus d’un milliard de roupies. Ce \nchiffre, Madame la présidente, peut paraitre énorme, mais il indique aussi que les trafiquants \nne reculent devant rien. Ils font même davantage appel à des ressortissants étrangers, surtout \nd’Europe, pour faire entrer de la drogue dans le pays. Et dans tout cela, Madame la \nprésidente, il y a l’épineux problème des drogues synthétiques. On en fabrique dans les \nlaboratoires clandestins, on en trouve sous toutes ses formes, facilement accessible aux petits \ncomme aux grands et plus prisé, car à prix abordable pour toutes les bourses. Nous sommes \ntémoins au quotidien de la zombification de nos jeunes, des dégâts causés à la santé mentale \ndes jeunes consommateurs et avec une recrudescence des cas de violence physiques et \nsexuelles. Et cela, s’est répandu dans villes et villages, n’épargnant aucune couche sociale. \nEn somme, Madame la présidente, je soutiens ce projet de loi, mais pas de façon \naveugle. Je le soutiens avec exigence car la lutte contre la drogue mérite mieux que des \nintentions, elle mérite des résultats. Donc, approuvons ce texte. Je termine, mais veillons à \nl’accompagner, à le surveiller, à l’ajuster pour qu’il ne devienne pas une énième réforme qui \nmeurt sur papier mais bien un levier de transformation réelle pour notre jeunesse, nos \nfamilles et notre pays. \n\n151 \n \nJe vous remercie. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Member, you mentioned a referendum. I stand under the \ncorrection of the Attorney General, of course, we do not yet have a method of referendum \neven if the word exists in our Constitution. Do you agree, hon. Attorney General? \nMr Glover: Yes, I agree. \nMadam Speaker: But it is a good thing to bear this in mind. Now, I have hon. \nNarsinghen! \n(9.29 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International \nTrade (Mr H. Narsinghen): Thank you, Madam Speaker, for giving me the floor. Drug \ntrafficking and drug addiction are among the most serious scourges affecting our society. \nMadam Speaker, it is very unfortunate that at a time, when we are discussing about this \nimportant Bill, we see that the two Members of the Opposition are not present and this is \nreally very unfortunate. We criticised in the Opposition for nearly ten years and we also made \nit very clear in our Government Programme that we will tackle this scourge of society in the \nmost frontal and steadfast manner.  \nThe present Bill, Madam Speaker, is a testimony of our commitment to crack down on \ndrugs. We do not brag; rather we act. Our Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister mean \nbusiness, unlike others in the previous regime. The Bill marks a radical departure from \nprevious practices. I will highlight the marked differences between NATReSA and the present \nNational Agency for Drug Control. \nThe previous regime was the champion of rhetoric. They were saying ‘mo pou kass \nlerin mafia ladrog.’ They mentioned that a couple of times. Instead, we have seen an \nunprecedented surge of drug trafficking and drug consumption during the reign of MSM. The \nseries of unsolved scandals are still vivid in our mind. A number of speakers before me \nmentioned tractopelle, gas cylinders in nature, Wakashio, and Navind Kistnah who was on \nthe run, en cavale.  \nIt is true that we cannot track down completely on drug. Let us not be demagogical. In \nmy own constituency, we are witnessing the damage being done by this pernicious scourge. \nBut it is a legacy of the previous regime. I listened carefully to what the Leader of the \n\n152 \n \nOpposition has been saying. We have seen the death of two young by overdose in my own \nconstituency. Madam Speaker, il ne faut pas se voiler la face. \nIt is also apposite, Madam Speaker, to analyse the status of drugs in two leading \nreports. Let us not forget the famous Rault Report and the Lam Shang Leen Report. One was \nin 1987 and the other one was in 2018. Around 1987, heroin and brown sugar were the \nfashionable drugs and a craze at that time. Also, at that point in time, we witnessed the slow \ncreeping of Subutex whereas, today, it is synthetic drug. Even more dangerous! Now, the \ndrug traffickers are targeting the poor more and more, as we have seen in the surge of prices \nin cannabis.  \nBoth reports, at that point in time, pointed out the involvement of some politicians and \nthe close circles of politicians. Both reports put on record the corruption at the level of the \nPolice, especially those who were supposedly to be trustees and guardians of the system. \nJustice Lam Shang Leen mentioned about the need to dismantle or to restructure ADSU. \nHave we done it up to now? Today, we have a very competent and dedicated Commissioner \nof Police, but we must also address this recommendation regarding the restructuring of \nADSU. I have to confess – I still have very bad echoes regarding the functioning of ADSU. \nTherefore, it must not be mere restructuring, but also, a careful selection of competent \nofficers.  \nMore importantly, we need men of integrity. Integrity is of essence. Unfortunately, \nintegrity is becoming more and more a rare commodity in our country. The Rault Report \nexplained the importance of strong political will. Yesterday, we did not have it. But today, we \nhave this strong political will. This is the marked difference.  \nMadam Speaker, resolving the drug scourge is not only a question of tracking down and \ninflicting punishment. It is also important to address the issue of prevention, treatment and \nrehabilitation, and coordination and research. Decisions on such an important issue cannot be \ncapricious according to the whims and fancies of a Maximo leader as we had, as it used to be. \nStrategic decisions must also be backed on data, figures and scientific information.  \nNow, for the first time, we are witnessing such high-level engagement. The new \nlegislation, by virtue of section 3, sets up a National Drug Control Commission. Who are the \nprotagonists? No more than the Prime Minister, the Deputy Prime Minister along with the \nMinister of Health, the Attorney General and other Ministers. It is sad to note that the Leader \n\n153 \n \nof Opposition was criticising such sort of nomination. It seems that the Leader of the \nOpposition does not understand the basic principle of separation of powers.  \nThis is part of the Executive. In all institutions, we have the political dimension and the \nadministrative dimension. So, it is unfortunate that the Leader of the Opposition has not \nunderstood the basics. It may also include, and this is a very good point, the Chief \nCommissioner of Rodrigues. We have not forgotten Rodrigues. We know the commitment of \nthe Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister, and also, the commitment of the Minister \nof Health, Mr Anil Bachoo, and the commitment of the Attorney General. We have no doubt \nthat the political will is now a reality.  \nIt is, in fact, the NDC Commission which will set national objectives and goals. In fact, \nit is very important to have a vision because we cannot afford to run without a sense of \ndirection. Overall coordination at the highest level is critical and this will be ensured by the \nCommission. There will be also, Madam Speaker, a Real Time Monitoring System (RTM) \nand publication of an analytic bulletin on a quarterly basis. Really impressive!  \nNow, coming to the National Agency for Drug Control, it is important at this juncture \nto compare the defunct NATReSA with the new National Agency for Drug Control. As you \nknow, NATReSA was focused on treatment and rehabilitation whereas the new National \nAgency for Drug Control adopts – this is important to put on record – a holistic and \nintegrated approach, which did not exist under NATReSA. Its mandate goes beyond \ntreatment to include – very important to note – prevention, control, enforcement, policy \ncoordination and data management. Such approach aligns itself with international best \npractices. It is a more balanced approach between public health, law enforcement, unlike \nNATReSA, which operated under the Ministry of Health. The new institution will be more \nautonomous. It is very important for it to be autonomous. At the same time, it will be a better \ncoordinated agency.  \nIt is very important to note that now, there is also clear inter-ministerial cooperation. It \nnow ropes in the PMO, DPMO, the Ministry of Health, Justice and Education. So, what we \nare doing is a multi-sectoral approach to tackle the drug scourge. This inter-agency model \nreflects the framework of the UNODC, (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime). It lays a \nlot of emphasis on human rights also and on public health. I consider it to be a paradigm shift. \nIt moves away from a purely punitive model to a more holistic one.  \n\n154 \n \nNow, the Bill includes explicit policies on harm reduction strategies and access to \nevidence-based treatment. It also caters for vulnerable groups, such as women, children and \npeople with mental problems. There is more emphasis on voluntary treatment and to reduce \ncriminalisation and drugs usually for small consumers. \nMadam Speaker, NATReSA was a single agency. It could be sensed that the agency \nwas overstressed at times and it could not deliver whereas the new agency will now comprise \nmultiple divisions. One is harped on policy, another one on research and strategy, another on \ntreatment and rehabilitation, yet another one on prevention and public awareness, especially \naddressing HIV and AIDS. So, each unit will be spearheaded by a Coordinator and \ncoordination and cross-fertilisation of knowledge will be of essence.  \nI will now focus on the important role of the Research Unit. As a researcher and an \nacademic myself, I know the importance of research. Robust research data is fundamental to \ndevelop an evidence-based drug policy. In fact, research can provide critical insights into the \ncomplex dynamics of drug abuse. Madam Speaker, decisions cannot be capricious and \nsubjective. Regular surveys are important, especially school-based surveys. Treatment based \non data is essential, for example, to know the types of drugs being used, demographics of \nclients and reasons for seeking help.  \nSocio-economic impact data is also critical, Madam Speaker. Cost associated with drug \nuse versus costs and benefits of different intervention must be made. Social impacts studies \nare critical to formulate informed decisions, both qualitative and quantitative research can \nshow the consequences on drug use on families, communities and public health. We also \nknow the impact of drug on marginalised communities or regions. The Research Unit must be \ncapable to evaluate programmes; rigorous evaluation is required. \nMadam Speaker, we are today having an important Bill. We know that this Government \nmeans business. We know that the Prime Minister means business. We know that the Deputy \nPrime Minister means business. We know that all Members of this Parliament possibly except \nthe two, we mean business, we want to crack down on drug and we are going to do it, we \nmust do it. Because the future generation will not excuse us if we cannot tackle this very \nimportant scourge is in our society. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, very much. \n\n155 \n \nMr Etwareea, keep an eye on the time if you can, please! \n(9.41 p.m.) \nMr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d'Or): I will. \nMadame la présidente, je suis particulièrement heureux qu’aucun des orateurs avant \nmoi n’a affirmé que le problème de la drogue est une fatalité et que nous devons vivre avec. \nCe soir, je suis heureux de faire partie de ce gouvernement qui après cinq mois aux affaires, \nprésente un projet ambitieux – la lutte contre le poison qui a déjà fait des milliers de morts et \nruiné autant de familles.  \nJe remercie le Premier ministre, son enthousiasme et sa fermeté qu’on a vu ce matin, \nsont tout à fait contagieux. Je remercie aussi le DPM. Je ne veux pas révéler la teneur des \ndiscussions que nous avons chaque semaine lors de nos réunions de bureau politique au \nMMM mais je peux dire que le DPM nous a, semaine après semaine, témoigné d’une certaine \nimpatience mais beaucoup de volonté et la sincérité du gouvernement de foncer avec la \nNational Agency for Drug Control Bill. Beaucoup a déjà été dit depuis tout à l’heure, il ne me \nreste pas grand-chose à ajouter.  \nToutefois, Madame la présidente, je vais pour ma part tenter de décortiquer l’aspect \nsocio-économique de la consommation de la drogue. Ce phénomène concerne selon des \nspécialistes entre 20,000 et 30,000 personnes de toutes âges et toutes les religions et de toutes \nles régions. Je m’empresse d’ajouter que ce fléau – et je viens à mon point essential – est la \npure conséquence et la manifestation de notre société qui roule à deux vitesses. Il n’appartient \npas à ce projet de loi ou à la loi ou l’institution qui sera créée au bout de régler les problèmes \nd’une société à deux vitesses mais je le fais comme une piqure de rappel pour dire que aussi \nlongtemps que le problème de la pauvreté ne sera pas vaincu d’une certaine manière, d’une \ncertaine hauteur, les problèmes de la drogue risquent de perdurer. Oui, malheureusement la \ndrogue c’est une affaire de riche et de pauvre, de toutes les façons. Je ne vais pas parler des \ntrafiquants qui font d’immense fortune sur le dos des consommateurs, des malheureux \npasseurs, des mules, ou des petits revendeurs qui se font exploiter par les grands trafiquants \nou encore des états mal ou sous-équipés qui ne font pas le poids face au moyen gigantesque \ndes trafiquants.  \nDès lors, il est évident que c’est la population à bas revenue vivant dans des quartiers \ndéfavorisés qui sont les premières victimes. Des études avancent que 95% des \n\n156 \n \nconsommateurs de drogue viennent des quartiers défavorisés. La came frappe là où les \ninfrastructures sociales sont absente, où les jeunes sont délaissés à eux-mêmes et où l’horizon \nparait bouché. Il y a une corrélation directe entre le niveau économique des gens, des \nconsommateurs et la consommation de la drogue. Diverses études à Maurice mais aussi \nà l’étranger concluent que les enfants des familles démunies sont vingt fois plus susceptibles \nde se droguer que les gosses des familles aisés et de niveau éducatif plus élever. La drogue est \ncertes consommée de plus en plus par des personnes aisées mais la drogue est plus \ndangereuse pour les personnes en situation de précarité. Ces problèmes nous ramènent aussi à \ndes difficultés d’accès aux soins et à la prévention. Les pauvres meurent plus que les riches \nd’intoxication. Ils entrent dans un cycle infernal qui les mène au désarroi, à la violence et à la \nprostitution.  \nToute la population défavorisée ne se shoot pas au synthétique mais sa précarité la rend \nvulnérable. Cette population pauvre a recours aux drogues synthétiques, moins chère, \nfacilement accessible, très addictive et dangereuse. Les riches sniffent de la cocaïne à R 3,000 \nla ligne dans le confort et l’intimité de leurs salons. La bonne nouvelle par rapport à ce projet \nde loi qui fait débat ici, est qu’il fait une grande place à la prévention. La prévention ici dans \nce projet de loi constitue un axe fort contre la consommation. Il s’agit de réduire la demande \npar le biais des campagnes d’information, de sensibilisation de ce que représentent les \ndangers. Mais, attention la sensibilisation qui doit bien sûr commencer à la maison, à l’école \nne suffit pas à elle seule. Je souhaite que la future National Agency for Drug Control mette en \nplace un mécanisme pour détecter les victimes de façons précoces avant qu’il ne soit trop \ntard. J’avance l’idée, Madame la présidente, de former une armée de travailleurs sociaux de \nproximité. On a déjà parlé de la police des proximités, je parle d’une armée de travailleurs \nsociaux de proximité qui pourront prévenir la descente aux enfers.  \nLe fossé entre riche et pauvre est aussi manifeste en matière de réhabilitation qui est \nl’autre axe fort de ces projets de loi. Ce n’est pas donné à tout le monde de se payer une cure \nd’intoxication. Des riches, gosses ou adultes, s’en vont discrètement en inde, en suisse, dans \ndes cliniques spécialisées et se paient des traitements couteaux quid de la population \ndéfavorisée. Où va-t-elle se soigner pour autant qu’elle a été convaincue de le faire ? À \nl’heure actuel, l’état ne peut prendre en charge que quelques 200 personnes au Brown \nSequard, à Montagne Longue ou encore à Mahebourg. Les organisations non-\ngouvernemental, l’église en particulier, font un travail immense mais tout cela n’est pas \nsuffisant vu l’ampleur du mal. \n\n157 \n \nMadame la présidente, c’est réjouissant de noter que le père fondateur de la National \nAgency for Drug Control accorde une place prépondérante à la réhabilitation de ceux qui sont \ntombés dans le piège de la drogue. Avec plus de moyen, avec un encadrement mieux fourni et \nplus engagé, la nouvelle institution viendra aussi combler le fossé entre les nantis et les moins \nnantis en matière de réhabilitation. Je ne vais pas rentrer dans le sujet du trafic de la drogue \nqui est largement commenté ici. \nJe vais conclure, Madame la présidente. Nous pouvons et nous devons déclarer la \nguerre à la drogue. Cette institution est un instrument à le faire. Nous gagnerons cette guerre \ncontre la drogue seulement si nous remportons la guerre contre la pauvreté, contre les \nmanques de perspective pour nos jeunes et nos moins jeunes mais surtout dans les milieux \ndéfavorisés.  \nMerci, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Je vous remercie.  \nL’honorable Seeburn ! \n(9.50 p.m.) \nMr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle): Thank you, \nMadam Speaker. We have reached a critical situation with the drug problem in Mauritius \nwhich the previous Government has failed to tackle.  \nMadam Speaker, the introduction of the National Agency for Drug Control Bill is a \nconcrete step for fight against illegal drugs and it is in the right direction to restore the trust of \nthe nation. We have an obligation to protect our children, to protect our youth and the people \nof Mauritius from the risk and harm of drugs. This government was elected on a promise of \nchange to pledge and deliver in creating a new Mauritius in the 21st century where we now \nsee changes happening, step by step, with a view to make Mauritius a better place to live.  \nMadam Speaker, there is no doubt that this Bil lays down strong foundations to tackle \ndrug problem together with a fresh and long-term approach, not only with the establishment \nof the National Agency for Drug Control under Section 5 of the Bill as the apex body but \nalso, with the establishment of the National Drug Control Commission where, Madam \nSpeaker, we see the voluntariness of this government going that extra mile and where the \nPrime Minister himself, standing as the Chairperson of the Commission and the Deputy \n\n158 \n \nPrime Minister as the Vice-Chairperson. This shows the seriousness of the drug problem and \nthe firm commitment of both leaders to deal with the issues.  \nMadam Speaker, this Bill empowers the Commission to set national objectives in the \nfight for the scourge of drugs and further empowers the Commission, independently, to \noversee all drug control activities in Mauritius and evaluate the implementation of the \nNational Drug Control Masterplan. The main objectives of the National Agency for Drug \nControl shall be to emphasise on the demand reduction of the drugs through the prevention \ntreatment and rehabilitation of persons who use drugs and their social integration in the \nsociety and, at the same time, minimising the negative health and social consequences.  \nMadam Speaker, Amnesty International says that criminalising drug does not decrease \ntheir use or supply. Instead, it drives the trade underground, increases the harm in using drugs \nand fuels organised crimes, corruptions and violence. Evidence from several regions around \nthe world shows that the war on drugs fails to decrease the use and availability of drug \ndespite severe law enforcement with death penalty for drug offences in Malaysia, China and \nSingapore, mass incarceration on the United States of America and torture in Mexico for drug \noffense, unless tackled otherwise.  \nThis is how we see the former President of the United States, Barack Obama, adopted a \ndifferent approach and announced in a press conference in Atlanta to tackle drug problem \nwith a demand reduction where he said – \n“The most important thing to do is to reduce demand and the only way to do that, is to \nprovide treatment.” \nAnd, he went on to say, Madam Speaker – \n“It is to be seen mainly as a public health problem.” \nAnd hence, proposed during his mandate, a Drug Control Budget where he tried to walk on \nthe steps of the former United States’ President, Jimmy Carter, who had previously pledged \nto spend more on treatment and prevention than law enforcement. \nHowever, Madam Speaker, the White House officials adopted a balancing exercise to \nsplit the financial budget of that year for public health side and law enforcement side to a \n50/50 approach to combat the drug problem. Perhaps a similar approach could be exercised \nwith more efficiency for Mauritius with better results. \n\n159 \n \nMadam Speaker, the Bill empowers the National Agency for Drug Control under \nSection 8 of the Act, to facilitate the implementation of the National Drug Control \nMasterplan and operate in accordance with the international standards and guidelines of the \nUnited Nations’ office on drugs and crimes and further conduct research to determine the \nmagnitude of the social and economic impact of the drug use in Mauritius.  \nMadam Speaker, the Bill further makes provision through the Treatment and \nRehabilitation Service Division of the National Agency for Drug Control to work in \ncollaboration with the Ministry of Health, the NGOs and mobilise resources locally with the \nprivate sector for vocational training and work placement programmes for persons recovering \nfrom drug disorders.  \nThe Bill further empowers the agency through its Prevention and Public Awareness \nDivision to lead national campaigns, sensitise people at large and conduct local awareness \nthrough workshops, community events and promote awareness of the risks involved in \nconsuming drugs.  \nThe Bill also provides the Agency to work along with the Ministry of Education to \nimplement drug use prevention curriculum, if possible, in all educational institutions by \nemphasising in promoting sports and life skills training programmes to keep youth engaged \nin activities.  \nMadam Speaker, the Bill makes provisions for the National Agency for Drug Control \nthrough its Supply Reduction Coordination Division to emphasise on enforcement of drug \ncontrol laws and facilitate cooperation with the police, with the customs and with the \nMauritius Revenue Authority. \n As rightly emphasised in our Government Programme, we shall work to enhance the \nregional maritime security to combat illegal drugs on the high seas and at the same time, \nincrease our surveillance capacity with the help of regional member states.  \nThe Bill rightly makes provisions for a confidential hotline access for individuals and \nfamilies seeking help, for reporting drug use and trafficking problems. \nMadam Speaker, this Bill introduces the most independent institution to tackle the \nvicious cycle of drugs in our society that has wrecked several lives, broken families and \nthreatened several communities.  \n\n160 \n \nMadam Speaker, we have pledged to protect our community and ensure that decent \nopportunities are available and we cannot conclusively achieve this if we do not take control \nof the fight against drugs. We shall aim to continue tackling inequalities through the largest \nprogramme to get more people at work and bring reforms for a better welfare state with a \nbetter education system, health services, justice and for a better economy. We have inherited \ndire economic situations from the previous government. Hence, we need to improve the \nefficiency and coordination to achieve better results. There is a need to ensure that this \nstrategy is translated into concrete actions as there is a real chance of reducing drug problems \nand creating a healthier society. \nBefore I conclude, Madam Speaker, one should know that the drug problem is not in \nisolation. It is often tied up with other social and family problems. It is a serious threat to \nhealth. Today, illegal drugs are widely available than ever, exposing a serious threat to our \nchildren, to the community and people at large which may lead to drug related crimes. Thus, \nthe fight for drug is not just a matter for the government. It is also a matter for the teachers at \nschool, for the parents at home, for the NGOs in the community at large and for everyone \nwho cares for the future of our society. \n Madam Speaker, this is an ongoing fight. We owe it to our children; we owe it to our \nfamily and friends and we owe it to our motherland. The Bill comes from a truly imaginative \nsolution where the compliance and implementation will have positive impact to overcome the \ncurrent drug problem in Mauritius and save lives of our people. We have a duty to stand \ntogether with a unified approach to face drug problems as stated by the Prime Minister \nearlier.  \nMadam Speaker, I take this opportunity to congratulate the hon. Attorney General for \ncoming forward with this legislation and his team for working on this Bill with clarity and \nfurther convey my sincere gratitude and deep appreciation to the hon. Prime Minister and the \nDeputy Prime Minister for their unwavering commitment to join hands together and do \nwhatever it takes to combat the current drug problem and once again, make Mauritius a better \nplace to live. \nMadam Speaker, with these words, I support the Bill. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Edouard, you are the last speaker, I think. \n(9.59 p.m.) \nMr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) Thank you, Madam Speaker.  \n\n161 \n \nMadam Speaker: Keep an eye on the time! \nMr Edouard: I will be very brief, I suppose.  \nThis is a wonderful piece of legislation from a government with a clear vision to \naddress the drug problem in the Republic of Mauritius. This Bill is most welcome.  \nThis Bill translates a will and a promise because on the campaign trail, we promised to \ntake care of our fellow citizens. With this Bill, the hon. Prime Minister is telling us, it is time \nfor action. As you know, actions speak louder than words. This Bill toils the start of a fight in \na relentless battle to overcome this issue of drugs in the republic. For my part, I will \nemphasise on Rodrigues and on section 2 (b) of this Bill, that is, disrupting the entry, \nproduction and availability of drugs.  \nC’est malheureux quand même qu’à Rodrigues, il y a une polémique malvenue et \nstérile sur la nécessité de porter une attention spéciale à ce problème de drogue. La croyance, \nc’est qu’à Rodrigues, le problème n’est pas aussi alarmant qu’à Maurice. C’est vrai que nous \navons un problème avec les drogues douces comme l’alcool et la cigarette qui nécessitent \naussi une attention spéciale. Mais avec votre permission, Madame la présidente, je vais citer \nles findings of a survey from 2022. These findings are important – \n• \n“12.4% (95% C.I, 11.0% – 13.8%) of people aged 15-64 years, residing in \nRodrigues, had ever used drugs (19.9% among males, against 3.8% among \nfemales). \n• \n2.3% (95% C.I, 1.8% – 3.0%) of residents of Rodrigues, aged 15-64 years, were \ncurrently using drugs (3.9% among males, against 0.6% among females). \n• \n19.0% of young people of Rodrigues aged 20-24 years had ever used drugs, \nagainst 2.7% who were currently consuming drugs. \n• \nAmong all young people aged 15-19 years in the Island of Rodrigues, 4.6% had \never used drugs and 2.2% were currently on drugs. \n• \n6.6% of students 15-24 years had ever used drugs, while 1.3% of them were \ncurrently consuming drugs. \n• \nApproximately 100-300 adults had ever used heroin, just around 50 -150 had \never used cough syrup, about one hundred had ever used multiple drugs, \n\n162 \n \ncomprising combinations of two or more drugs such as cough syrup, cannabis, \nheroin, psychotropic tablets and new psychoactive substance (synthetic drugs).” \nAmong the current users, I think is very important for us to pay a special attention to – \n• \nAmong current users of drugs, 30.8% admitted it was easy or very easy to get \naccess to drugs for consumption purpose. \n• \nAlmost all residents in Rodrigues, 97.9%, reported cannabis herb was available \nin Rodrigues, while 26.5% believed heroin was also available and 28.8% that \nnew psychoactive substances were also a trendy drug in Rodrigues. \n• \nAmong residents of Rodrigues who had ever used drugs, 34.1% had consumed \ntheir first drugs in the main Island of Mauritius, while 62.7% had the first drug \nexperience in Rodrigues itself. \nSo, for me, the situation of drugs is alarming because though it is only one gram, its one gram \nde trop. We must fight to disrupt the entry of drugs, especially synthetic drugs in Rodrigues. \nSome also say that there is also production of synthetic drugs in Rodrigues.  \nWe are happy that section 9 (2)(o) makes provision for Rodrigues to be represented on \nthe Drug Control Board. But under section 3 (3), again, as I said the other time, the Chief \nCommissioner may attend meetings of the National Drug Control Commission. We have had \na bad experience with this ‘may attend.’ We have had a bad experience in the Rodrigues \nRegional Act where it is said the Chief Commissioner ‘may attend Cabinet meetings.’ It \nnever happened! \nWe ask ourselves why, as Head of Rodrigues, the Chief Commissioner is not a member \nof the National Drug Control Commission. I most humbly beg the hon. Prime Minister to \ninclude the Chief Commissioner in section 3 (2) so that he becomes a member of the National \nDrug Control Commission.  \nNow, I come to the visualisation of control of drugs in Rodrigues. I imagine a handful \nof Police Officers in Rodrigues who have to look after the port, the airport and cruising \nvessels who come very near the reefs of Rodrigues. I heard before, other colleagues were \ntalking about Wakashio and what may have happened. We were also asking ourselves in \nRodrigues why do these large vessels cruise so near to Rodrigues. Why do they cruise so \nnearby? So, we have to pay attention to this as well. \n\n163 \n \nIn the endeavour to control drugs in Rodrigues, we must think that Rodrigues is not a \ndistrict as the other districts in Mauritius. Rodrigues is an island. That is why I am saying a \nhandful of Police Officers is not sufficient to address this drug control problem. We know that \nthe Lam Shang Leen Report on drugs has pertinent recommendations for Rodrigues. There is \na need to invest in equipment in Rodrigues necessary for the control of the entry of drugs in \nRodrigues. \nThere is a need in Rodrigues to have systematic scanning of all containers reaching \nRodrigues because now, as it is, containers are leaving the port area unchecked. So, there is a \nneed to have systematic scanning of all containers leaving the port area. This is the wish of \nthe Police Officers who are responsible for the control of drugs in Rodrigues. Also at the \nairport, there must be systematic scanning of all luggage in the airport. \nSo, we see that it is not that alarming. I can see, but we must pay special attention to \ndisrupt the entry, the protection and the availability of drugs in Rodrigues. I recall my late \ngodfather who, very often, used the term ‘cunning like a fox.’ We know that the dealers are \ncunning like a fox. There are many ways to get away with trafficking. We must also pay \nattention in Rodrigues as we all see and know that there is money laundering. We must see \nwhat is happening in the different cultural and leisure activities where it may be an \nopportunity for money laundering. \nThis is a wonderful piece of legislation. I thank the hon. Prime Minister for this. He is \ncalling us for action, and I am happy to support this Bill.  \nThank you very much. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Deputy Prime Minister! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I beg to move \nfor the adjournment of the debates. \nMr Bhagwan rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nDebate adjourned accordingly. \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Tuesday 22 April 2025 at 11.30 a.m. \n\n164 \n \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded.  \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned! Thank you everybody. Thank you for \nhaving stayed for almost 11 hours. Thanks to the staff from everywhere who have been with \nus from this morning. \nAt 10.12 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 22 April 2025 at \n11.30 a.m.",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-april-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/395",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 395,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/395) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Smart \nCity Scheme, he will state if consideration will be given for the waiving of the tax \nexemptions granted to companies engaged in projects thereunder.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Member for this question.   \nIn fact, a series of tax exemptions has been granted to the promoters under the Smart \nCity Scheme since its introduction on 18 June 2015.  \nThe main ones include – \n(a) \nexemption from VAT on buildings and infrastructure; \n(b) \n8-year income tax holiday on income derived from real estate activities within the \nSmart City; \n(c) \nexemption from Customs Duty on import of machinery and materials for \nconstruction of buildings; \n(d) \nexemption from Registration Duty and Land Transfer Tax on the transfer of land \ninto a Smart City Company;  \n(e) \nexemption from Morcellement Fee, and \n(f) \nexemption from land conversion tax for developments, other than residential, on \nland in the Smart City.  \nThe House will recall, Madam Speaker, in my reply to PQ B/130 on 18 March of this \nyear, I informed the House that the total amount of exemptions granted since the introduction \nof the Smart City Scheme is around Rs6.61 billion. \nMadam Speaker, in the context of the forthcoming budget exercise and taking into \naccount the state of the economy, the Ministry of Finance is carrying out an analysis of \n\n26 \n \nvarious schemes to determine their effectiveness and their impact on public finances. The \nwaiving off of any tax exemptions granted to companies under this scheme would also be \nclosely examined. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you! \nYes, next question, hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River! \nRODRIGUES – POINTE COTON RESORT HOTEL CO. LTD – RENOVATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/396",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 396,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/396) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Pointe Coton \nResort Hotel Co. Ltd., in Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from Airport \nHoldings Ltd., information as to the amount of funds disbursed for the renovation thereof, \nindicating the name of the contractor selected therefor.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the Cotton Bay Hotel, which \nwas constructed in 1991, had been operating with a capacity of 60 rooms. I am also informed \nby the Officer-In-Charge of Airport Holdings Ltd that, on 15 March 2023, the Board of \nPointe Coton Resort Hotel Co. Ltd approved the renovation of the existing 60 rooms and the \nconstruction of 32 additional rooms, as well as upgrades to the public areas, back-of-house \nfacilities, technical building and associated external works and drainage infrastructure.  \nOn that same date, the Board of Pointe Coton Resort Hotel Co. Ltd approved that the \nhotel renovation and extension project be undertaken at the revised estimated cost of Rs650 \nmillion, excluding VAT. That was on 15 March.  \nOn 12 June 2023, the contract for the refurbishment and extension works was awarded \nto Laxmanbhai and Co. (Mauritius) Ltd at the cost of Rs 683,501,922.42 – they don’t forget \nthe cents. Again, that’s exclusive of VAT. \nI must point out, Madam Speaker, that the Letter of Award was signed on behalf of \nPointe Coton Resort Hotel Co. Ltd, by Mr Ken Arian, Director, without Board approval. \nSigned without Board approval! It was only four days later, that is, on 16 June 2023 that the \nBoard of Pointe Coton Resort Hotel Co. Ltd approved that the contract be awarded to \nLaxmanbhai and Company (Mauritius) Ltd at the negotiated price of Rs683,501,922.42, \nagain exclusive of VAT. Worse, Madam Speaker, this Letter of Award of 12 June 2023 was \n\n27 \n \nratified by the same Board only on 18 September 2023, that is, a bit more than three months \nlater.   \nNow, an additional amount of Rs28,321,006, exclusive of VAT, representing variation \nworks, was incurred and brought the renovation project to Rs711,822,928.42. So far, an \namount of Rs650,715,715, exclusive of VAT, has already been paid to the contractor.    \nFurthermore, from the period May 2023 to April 2024, contracts were awarded to 28 \nsuppliers for the procurement of other components of the project, including furniture, kitchen \nand laundry equipment – you would have thought it’s called money laundering equipment – \nas well as the purchase and installation of a desalination plant, at the total cost of \nRs86,342,073.63. As at date, an amount of Rs78,128,965 has been disbursed to these \ncontractors. I am tabling the information with respect to these 28 suppliers.  \nMadam Speaker, as if that was not enough. An additional sum of Rs15,962,062 was \ndisbursed by the company to 22 service providers for communication, training, IT System \nand insurance, amongst others. Again, I am tabling this information. \nAnd, I am sure hon. Members will be surprised, wait for it – a further amount of Rs \n83,918,643 has been paid to 12 consultants, including Etwaro & Associates Ltd.  This \ninformation is again being tabled.  \n(Interruptions) \nNothing to do with him.  \n(Interruptions) \nIt’s not written in the same way. \nMadam Speaker, so, we are faced with a project which was initially estimated at Rs650 \nmillion and which is now estimated to cost taxpayers Rs1,024,956,038. \nAn hon. Member: Dan valiz! Voler! \nThe Prime Minister: This represents an increase of 58% of the original.   \nAn hon. Member: Rampli dan valiz!  \nAn hon. Member: Chor! \nMr Jhummun: Mahachor. \n\n28 \n \nThe Prime Minister: This is a classic example of how projects were implemented \nunder the previous regime. To date, an amount of Rs788,347,569, excluding VAT has been \npaid to the contractor, the different service providers and the consultants. \nMadam Speaker, in view of these really disturbing facts that have emerged from the \nway this project has been handled since its inception, a 58% increase, including the dubious \nprocurement process (approval before the Board approves), this matter is being referred to the \nFinancial Crimes Commission for investigation.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Third Member for Grand’Baie and Poudre d'Or! \nIMF & WORLD BANK – 2025 SPRING MEETINGS – MAURITIUS’ \nREPRESENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/397",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 397,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/397) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre D'or) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the 2025 \nSpring Meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank held in Washington \nD.C, he will state if Mauritius was represented therein and, if so, indicate the – \n(a) \noutcome thereof, and  \n(b) \nactions, if any, being envisaged thereon.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the 2025 Spring Meetings of the IMF and the \nWorld Bank Group took place from 21 to 26 April in Washington. \nThe Governor of the Bank of Mauritius, in his capacity as Alternate Governor \nrepresenting Mauritius on the Board of Governors of the IMF, participated in the Spring \nMeetings. \nI wish to inform the hon. Member that Government already had extensive and fruitful \ndiscussions with the IMF and the World Bank; especially with the IMF, during its Article IV \nConsultation Mission. They were in Mauritius just a few days before the holding of the 2025 \nSpring Meetings. \nAfter having taken cognizance of the economic and fiscal quagmire in which the \nprevious government has left our country, the IMF stressed the urgency for fiscal \nconsolidation and strengthening of the monetary policy framework in order to secure \nfinancial stability. \n\n29 \n \nThe IMF further emphasised on the need for structural reforms to boost our external \ncompetitiveness, promote private sector-led growth, and enhance labour supply and skills. \nFurther to discussions, the IMF has welcomed our commitment and efforts to \nimplementing structural reforms as well as a credible medium-term fiscal consolidation plan. \nMadam Speaker, the World Bank has also looked at the precarious situation the \nprevious regime has left us and has recommended ways to implement fiscal consolidation and \neconomic revival. \nI can assure the House and the hon. Member that the valuable suggestions of both the \nIMF and the World Bank are being considered in the context of the budget preparation and \nour overall determination to reconstruct our economy and our society. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you! \nYes, hon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet! \nVERDE FRONTIER SOLUTIONS LTD – CONTRACTS – PROCUREMENT \nMETHOD",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/398",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 398,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/398) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Verde \nFrontier Solutions Ltd., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the \nnumber of contracts awarded thereto by Government and/or public bodies over the period \n2015 to 2024, indicating in each case the – \n(a) \ncorresponding contractual value thereof, and  \n(b) \nprocurement method used therefor.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, according to information obtained so far, 20 \ncontracts have been awarded by ministries and public bodies during the period from 2015 to \n2024 to Verde Frontier Solutions Ltd for a total contractual value of Rs50.6 million.  \nFurthermore, MauBank Holdings Ltd has awarded a contract of Rs17.9 million to a \nConsortium comprising Priscus Finance, Gibraltar Advisory and Verde Frontier Solutions \nLtd as transaction advisor for the disposal of its subsidiaries.  \nWith regard to parts (a) and (b) of the question, I am tabling the corresponding \ncontractual value of each contract and the procurement method used thereafter.  \n\n30 \n \nMadam Speaker, in view of the fact that additional information is being compiled, I \nintend to make a further statement on the entire Verde saga. \nThis is now the subject of an ongoing inquiry, and I would therefore refrain from \nsaying more in order not to prejudice that enquiry. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you! \nYes, hon. First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nCITÉ LA CURE – ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES – COMPLAINTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/399",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 399,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Ms Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/399) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Cité La Cure, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of \nPolice information as to whether he has been aware of complaints from the inhabitants \nthereof of alleged cases of suspicious transactions being carried out thereat at night, including \nillegal rallies, loud music and illegal parking on the Traffic Centre of the region and, if so, \nindicate the measures being envisaged in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat from November 2024 to 02 May 2025, around 20 complaints have been received from \nthe inhabitants of Cité La Cure with regard to illegal activities at night which include loud \nmusic and illegal parking at the traffic centre, amongst others. \nThe local Police attended to these complaints and effected site visits to the location \nmentioned in the complaints. The Police have noted that the main complaints pertain to the \nplaying of loud music which cause inconveniences to the inhabitants. \nThe Police have taken the following measures to curb the proliferation of the illegal \nactivities. I have discussed with the Commissioner of Police; he decides on the operation of \nforces. \n(i) \nThe SMF is being brought in to assist the Police for the maintenance of law and \norder. Furthermore, joint crackdown operations are being carried out by day and \nnight in the region by personnel of Divisional Support Unit, Emergency Response \nServices, Police de L’Environnement, ADSU and CID for the prevention and \ndetection of offences. \n\n31 \n \n(ii) \nOptimum use of the seven Safe City cameras found in that region for monitoring \nthe movements of suspicious persons and vehicles in the region are being done. \n(iii) The Crime Prevention Unit in collaboration with the Brigade Pour La Protection \nde La Famille and NGOs are raising public awareness on the various scourges \nimpacting on the community. The ongoing Neighbourhood Watch has been \nenhanced to ensure better collaboration between the inhabitants and the Police. \nNotwithstanding the complaints mentioned earlier with respect to the region of Cité La \nCure, again, I had discussions with the Commissioner of Police. Because what happens all \nthe time is we hear that the Police have gone there, and patrols have been carried out, but the \nproblem is continuing. We have to put a stop to it! So, I am informed that with a view to \npreventing the upsurge of substance abuse in this area, the ADSU again, with the assistance \nof the SMF has, so far, conducted 15 crackdown operations, resulting in the arrest of 13 \nsuspects from November 2024 to 02 May 2025. \nMadam Speaker, the Police is taking all the necessary measures to ensure a peaceful \nenvironment in the region of Cité La Cure. They will be working in close collaboration with \nthe inhabitants to address the problems they are facing.  Furthermore, the Police de \nL’Environment will be provided more resources to ensure a more effective service in the \nregion to combat the problem of noise pollution. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nHon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac ! \nMR S.H.A. – APPOINTMENTS & REMUNERATION (2015-2024)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/400",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 400,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/400) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Mr S.H.A., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the \nparastatal bodies in which since 2015 to November 2024, he – \n(a) \nserved as chairperson or board member, indicating the allowances drawn in each \ncase, and \n(b) \nwas appointed as receiver manager and/or liquidator, indicating the fees derived \nin each case. \n\n32",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the House will surely recall that the former \nPrime Minister refused to answer questions relating to Mr Sattar Hajee Abdoolah.  \n(Interruptions) \nHe never answered any question! He was a protected man! \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Boss! \nThe Prime Minister: Boss!  \nI have decided to depart from that and to answer because it is a matter national interest! \nAnd I thank the hon. Member for the question. \nI presume that the hon. Member is not only referring to parastatal bodies, but also to \nstate-owned enterprises and entities involving public funds and which have retained the \nservices of Mr Sattar Hajee Abdoolah for the period 2015 to November 2024. \nAs regards part (a) of the question, I am informed that Mr Sattar Hajee Abdoolah has \nnot served as either the Chairperson or a Board Member of any parastatal body over that \nperiod, that is, 2015 to November 2024. \nHowever, he was appointed as Chairperson of SBM Holdings Ltd from 11 March 2020. \nHe only gave notice of his resignation after the famous regime of voyous lost the election in \nNovember 2024.  \nMr Sattar Hajee Abdoolah also served as a Member of Committees of SBM Holdings \nLtd and the Director of several subsidiaries of the SBM Group. \nMadam Speaker, accordingly, for the period 2020 to 2024, he was paid by SBM \nHoldings Ltd an amount of Rs16.6 million as fees for serving as Chairperson and a \nCommittee Member.  Rs16.6 million!  \nLook at all these young people! I am sure they are going to go through exams, they are \ngoing to work hard, but who will get to be paid that sum of money? Rs16.6 million! \nIn addition to the Rs16.6 million, he was also paid an amount of Rs20.7 million as fees \nas Board and Committee Member by the subsidiaries of SBM Holdings Ltd for the same \nperiod.  \n\n33 \n \n Therefore, if you add the two, a total amount of Rs37.3 million was paid to Mr Sattar \nHajee Abdoolah by the SBM Group over a period of few years. Rs37.3 million? \nMs Anquetil: Scandaleux ! \nThe Prime Minister: It is more than a scandal! \nMadam Speaker, concerning part (b) of the question, I am informed that over the period \n2015 to November 2024, Mr Sattar Hajee Abdoolah was appointed by MauBank Ltd to \nprovide insolvency services in respect of 13 companies where payment for these services was \nmade to Grant Thornton (Advisory Services) Ltd. Now, Mr Sattar Hajee Abdoolah is himself \na Senior Director of this company! A clear case – could not be clearer – of conflict of interest, \nand possibly, surely of malpractice! This is a case of the right hand giving to the left hand! \nAn hon. Member: Exactly! \nThe Prime Minister: And nobody is saying anything! This matter, Madam Speaker, \nwill be referred to the relevant authorities for investigation. \nMadam Speaker, Mr Sattar Hajee Abdoolah received the following – \n(i) \nA total of Rs10.9 million as Receiver in respect of seven companies. That is \napart from the other things I have mentioned; \n(ii) \nRs600,000 as Joint Receiver in respect of three companies; \n(iii) \nRs6 million as Liquidator in respect of one company; \n(iv) \nRs2.3 million as Joint Liquidator in respect of one company, and \n(v) \nRs1.9 million as Administrator in respect of one company. \nThe House may wish to note that Mr Sattar Hajee Abdoolah has also acted as Joint \nAdministrator for Air Mauritius Ltd over the period from April 2020 to September 2021, for \nwhich an amount of Rs141 million has been paid. \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members: Voler! Voler! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: Yes! Yes!  \nHon. Members: Shame! Shame! Voler! \nThe Prime Minister: And these were the people who said I had bought an airplane and \nthat I am going to leave the country! \n\n34 \n \n(Interruptions) \nLook at what they were doing! \nI say it again: Mr Abdoolah was the director of Grant Thornton (Advisory Services) \nLtd! \nFurthermore, over the period April 2020 to October 2021, he acted as Administrator for \nAirmate Ltd, which is a subsidiary of Airport Holdings Ltd, for which an amount of Rs5 \nmillion was paid to the same Grant Thornton (Advisory Services) Ltd. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker, the House may also wish to note that in April 2017, following the \nsetting up by the then government of a Commission of Inquiry on the Disposal of Shares of \nBAI Company (Mauritius) Ltd and the related entities in Britam Holdings Ltd (Kenya), Mr \nSattar Hajee Abdoolah was appointed as Assessor in the Commission and he was paid Rs2.2 \nmillion for his services. Again, this is all adding up! \n(Interruptions) \nFurthermore, ... \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members: Enkor? Enkor? \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: Furthermore, a total amount of Rs79.6 million has been paid by \nparastatal bodies, state-owned enterprises involving public funds again to Grant Thornton \n(Advisory Services) Ltd and Grant Thornton Ltd for the provision of consultancy and other \nservices, of which, Rs28 million has been paid by the SBM Group.   \nAn hon. Member: Kalkilatris eklate la! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: Who was this Minister who said his computer inn eklate? It is the \nsame! It is the same! \n(Interruptions) \nDr. Aumeer: Mr Viral Mauritius! \n\n35 \n \nThe Prime Minister: When we compute all the figures, that is, between 2015 to 2024, \nan astronomical figure of Rs287.2 million was paid to Mr Sattar Hajee Abdoolah and entities \nwhere he has a direct interest! Madam Speaker, everybody is... \nAn hon. Member: La honte! \nThe Prime Minister: La honte! \nAn hon. Member: Alibaba! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: Alibaba et un voleur!  \n(Interruptions) \nNon, il y a aussi d’autres voleurs!  \nThis is an indication, Madam Speaker, of the sort of incestuous relationship that existed \nbetween some individuals and those who were in power under the previous regime. \nI must state that the information which I am providing in the House today are not \nexhaustive yet. We are still looking! A thorough exercise is being undertaken on the \nramifications of his personal actions as well as that of his firms, including the real possibility \nof conflicts of interest and malpractices. I will say no more! \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, supplementary question! \nMr Jhummun: Thank you, Madam Speaker. After having heard the hon. Prime \nMinister, I can say that there is no better word than ‘asset stripper’ to describe what has been \ndone. Can the hon. Prime Minister inform the House whether there will be a forensic analysis \nabout all these dealings and whether there will be une commission d’enquête là-dessus? \nThank you. \nThe Prime Minister: There will be no get-out-of-jail free card. There will not be any. \nWe will be doing all this. We have a responsibility as a government. We said we would, and \nwe will. We intend to hunt these. I do not want to use other words, but we have to do this. We \nhave an obligation towards the country, towards this new generation that such people do not \nstrip Mauritius of all the money that people have been contributing. \nMadam Speaker: Next supplementary! \n\n36 \n \nMr Jhummun: Can we go further and try to make an inquiry about the assets of that \nperson, how much he has acquired over the last 10 years? Personal assets! \nThe Prime Minister: All this would be done by the investigation. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. C’est normal! \nYes, hon. Third member for Beau Bassin… \n(Interruptions) \nMay I be allowed to call, Members?  \nYes, hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière. \nAUDIOVISUAL SECTOR – LIBERALISATION – LEGAL FRAMEWORK",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/401",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 401,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/401) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nproposed liberalisation of the audiovisual sector in Mauritius, he will state when amendments \nwill be brought to the legal framework therefor.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the House may recall that it was under my \nprime ministership that in of August 2000, the Independent Broadcasting Authority Act was \nenacted to make provision for the liberalisation of the audiovisual sector, hence, the first \nprivate radios became a reality in Mauritius. \nThe Independent Broadcasting Authority Act, therefore, already caters for the \nliberalisation of the audiovisual sector in Mauritius. In fact, the First Schedule of the IBA Act \nrelating to licences, provides, inter alia, for Private Commercial Free-to-Air Medium Wave \nRadio Broadcasting licence, Private Commercial Free-to-Air FM Radio Broadcasting licence \nas well as Private Commercial Television Broadcasting licence, which are all regulated under \nSection 19 of the IBA Act.   \nTherefore, Madam Speaker, the question of amending the IBA Act in order to cater for \nthe liberalisation of the audiovisual sector in Mauritius does not arise. It is already there. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to apprise the House that during the period 14 November 2013 \nto 25 January 2014, the IBA received four applications from local and international \ncompanies for a private television licence. In this connection, the then IBA Board had \ndecided that applications for private television licence to broadcast films, sports and \n\n37 \n \nentertainment programmes, would be invited through an Expression of Interest from all \ninterested parties. However, not surprisingly, no such Expression of Interest had been issued \nby the IBA during the last 10 years. None! \nMadam Speaker, I wish to point out that the IBA Act was amended in 2019 to provide \nfor the limit of foreign shareholding in a company applying for a licence to be increased from \n20% to 49.9%. However, despite this amendment, no application for a private television \nlicence has been received by the Authority. \nMadam Speaker, as already announced in the Government Programme 2025-2029, my \nGovernment will stand by its commitment and therefore arrangements will be made for the \nintroduction of private television channels, in order to promote pluralism in the audiovisual \nsector.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, supplementary! \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. J’ai bien compris la réponse de l’honorable \nPremier ministre, mais je voudrais qu’il nous confirme une chose. Depuis l’entrée en fonction \ndu nouveau gouvernement, et lui-même en tant que nouveau Premier ministre, est-ce qu’il \npeut confirmer qu’il n’y a pas eu aucune demande pour opérer une télévision privée, parce \nqu’il y a certaines informations qui circulent à l’effet qu’il y a des demandes qui ont été \ndéposées depuis l’entrée en fonction du nouveau gouvernement pour opérer une télévision \nprivée ? \nThe Prime Minister: I am not aware that any demand has been made yet, but when \nlook at the whole picture – we are going to relook at this –, I am sure there will be interest. At \none point, I remember there was an interest when I was Prime Minister, after I passed the \nlaw. And then, I do not know why, I supposed I lost the elections and nobody was prepared to \ngive any money under the table. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! That’s it? Mr Quirin?  Alright, the hon. Second Member for \nFlacq and Bon Accueil, Mr Beechook! \nCSR FRAMEWORK – FUNDS COLLECTED & UTILISED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-april-2025",
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/402",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 402,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/402) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Corporate \nSocial Responsibility (CSR) framework, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \n\n38 \n \nMauritius Revenue Authority, information as to the amount of funds collected thereunder \nover the past five years, indicating – \n(a) \nhow these funds were allocated, giving a breakdown thereof; \n(b) \nthe portion spent directly by companies under the CSR scheme; \n(c) \nthe amount of funds disbursed by the National CSR Foundation; \n(d) \nthe funds utilised by Government for national social programs, and \n(e) \nthe amount of funds redirected to the Consolidated Fund.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) \nframework was introduced in 2009 when profitable firms were required to either spend 2 per \ncent of their profits on CSR activities approved by Government or to transfer these funds to \nGovernment to be used in the fight against poverty.  \nI am informed by the Mauritius Revenue Authority that, during the last five financial \nyears, that is, from Financial Year 2019/2020 to Financial Year 2023/2024, an amount of \nsome Rs5.3 billion has been collected as CSR contributions from companies.   \nI am further informed that, in the current financial year, the MRA has as at end of \nMarch 2025 collected Rs917 million as CSR contributions. \nAs regards part (a) of the question, as from January 2019, a company may use up to 25 \n% of its CSR contribution to implement a CSR Programme or finance a non-governmental \norganisation implementing a CSR Programme in the priority areas of intervention. In both \ncases, it is the company that actually decides on the use of funds. \nA company is therefore required to remit at least 75% of its CSR contribution to the \nMRA. \nMadam Speaker, over the past five years, the amount collected by the MRA has been \nremitted as follows – \n(i) \nfor the Financial Years 2019/2020 to 2022/2023 to the Accountant-General for \nonward remittance to the National Social Inclusion Foundation is Rs5.3 billion; \n(ii) \nas from Financial Year 2023/2024, an amount of Rs200 million to the \nAccountant-General for onward remittance to the Poverty Reduction Fund and \nthe remainder to the National Social Inclusion Foundation. \nExceptionally, for Financial Year 2024/2025, an amount of Rs1 billion has been \nearmarked to be credited into the Consolidated Fund for onward remittance to the Poverty \nReduction Fund. \n\n39 \n \nMadam Speaker, regarding part (b) of the question, I am informed by the MRA that an \namount of Rs1.4 billion has been spent directly by companies under the CSR scheme from \nFinancial Year 2019/2020 to Financial Year 2023/2024. \nAs regards part (c) of the question, I am informed by the National Social Inclusion \nFoundation, during the last five financial years, it has disbursed an amount of Rs3.4 billion to \nnon-governmental organisations. \nI am further informed that, in the current financial year, that is, the end of March 2025, \nit has disbursed an amount of Rs768 million to non-governmental organisations. \nMadam Speaker, regarding part (d) of the question, an amount of Rs200 million has \nbeen transferred to the Poverty Reduction Fund in Financial Year 2023/2024 and an amount \nRs1.2 billion has been earmarked to be transferred to the Poverty Reduction Fund in the \nFinancial Year 2024/2025. Out of the Rs1.2 billion, an amount of around Rs917 million has \nbeen transferred to the Poverty Reduction Fund to finance national social programmes.  \nAs regards part (e) of the question, only Rs1 billion will be redirected from the CSR \ncontributions to the Consolidated Fund for onward remittance to the Poverty Reduction Fund. \nMadam Speaker: C’est bon, Monsieur Beechook? Because time is already up, \nanyway. That was for everybody to understand, we were having questions for the Prime \nMinister. Now, time is up.  \nThe Table has been advised that the following PQs under PMQT have been withdrawn: \nPQ B/404, B/406, B/407, B/408, and B/409.  \nNow, we proceed. Do you want to start or shall we break at this stage? Okay, we can \nstart. We break at one, Okay! J’aime avoir le consensus. Now we proceed with Parliamentary \nQuestions, and I will call on hon. Beejan, Second Member for Grand’Baie and Poudre d’Or! \nVALE, CAP MALHEUREUX & GRAND GAUBE – TRAFFIC & ROAD SAFETY \nCALMING MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/403",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 403,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Ms Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/403) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to air connectivity \nbetween Mauritius and Rodrigues, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number of daily flights \noperated by Air Mauritius to and from Rodrigues for each month during the \nperiod October 2024 to April 2025, and  \n(b) \nconsider using his good office to request Air Mauritius Ltd., to increase the daily \noperated flights on Rodrigues and to give a special consideration to Rodriguan \nresidents in urgent and/or exceptional cases.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed that Air Mauritius Ltd operates five daily ATR72 roundtrips on \nthe Mauritius-Rodrigues route. In addition to these daily operations, supplementary flights \nare operated to meet additional demand during peak periods, with the number of flights even \nincreasing up to 10 per day. \nIn case of emergency where passengers from Rodrigues need immediate medical \nattention, Air Mauritius Ltd usually ensures that these passengers obtain a seat on the flight. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that during the period October \n2024 to April 2025, Air Mauritius Ltd had operated a total of 1,447 roundtrips on the \nMauritius-Rodrigues route. These include additional flights over and above the five daily \nflights. A copy of the information requested for by the hon. Member is being placed in the \nLibrary of the National Assembly. \nFor the Financial Year April 2025/March 2026, Air Mauritius Ltd is planning to have \n2,403 roundtrips on the Mauritius-Rodrigues route. This represents an additional 153 \nroundtrips as compared to the previous financial year. \n \nMR N.B. – FORMER ICAC/FCC DIRECTOR – REMUNERATION & BENEFITS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/404",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 404,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/404) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Mr N.B., former Director General of Independent Commission against Corruption \n\n147 \n \nand the Financial Crimes Commission, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommission, information as to the – \n(a)  salary, benefits and other perks drawn over the period 2015 to November 2024, \nand  \n(b)  cost incurred by the Commission for his travel to London in 2019 to attend the \nPrivy Council hearing in the MedPoint case.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSILVER BANK LIMITED – BANKING LICENCE & PUBLIC FUNDS \nDEPOSITED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/405",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 405,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/405) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Silver \nBank, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Bank of Mauritius, information as to \nthe – \n(i) \nconditions under which banking licence was granted thereto, and  \n(ii) \nreasons for the placing thereof under conservatorship on 13 February \n2024, indicating the status thereof, and  \n(b) \nstate the amount of public funds deposited thereat at the time of conservatorship, \ngiving details thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: With regard to part (a)(i) of the question, I am informed by the Bank of \nMauritius that Silver Bank Limited was issued a new banking licence on 11 November 2021, \nfollowing a change of name after the acquisition of BanyanTree Bank Limited. \nThe Bank of Mauritius granted its approval for the acquisition of BanyanTree Bank \nLimited following its due diligence and the recapitalisation of the bank by the new \nshareholders. \nWith regard to part (a)(ii) of the question, in view of the fact that there was reasonable \ncause to believe that the capital of Silver Bank is potentially impaired and its Directors could \nhave been engaged in practices detrimental to the interests of its depositories. According to \nsection 65 of the Bank of Mauritius Act, the Silver Bank was placed under conservatorship \non 13 February 2024. \n\n148 \n \nConcerning part (b) of the question, I am informed that Government-related entities \ninvested an amount of Rs3.55 billion in Silver Bank Limited as follows – \nProjects Development Fund \nRs3 billion \nNational Insurance Co. Ltd \nRs150 million \nNIC General Insurance Co. Ltd \nRs125 million \nMunicipal Council of Curepipe \nRs87.7 million \nSugar Insurance Fund Board \nRs40 million \nMauritius Housing Company Ltd \nRs100 million \nCity Council of Port Louis \nRs45 million \n \nMAURITIUS CITIZENSHIP – FOREIGN BENEFICIARIES (2019-2024)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025",
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/406",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 406,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/406) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Mauritius Citizenship, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Passport \nand Immigration Office, information as to the number thereof granted to foreigners for the \nperiods November 2019 to November 2024 and November 2024 to date, indicating in each \ncase the – \n(a)  names of the beneficiaries thereof and their respective country of birth, and  \n(b) \nsection of the Mauritius Citizenship Act under which citizenship was granted.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nFOND DU SAC – RAVE PARTY – POLICE RAID",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/407",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 407,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/407) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nPolice raid carried out at a rave party on 11 November 2023 at Fond du Sac, he will, for the \n\n149 \n \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to where \nmatters stand as to the inquiry initiated thereinto, indicating the – \n(a) \nvenue where the party was held; \n(b) \nquantity and nature of drugs seized, and  \n(c) \nnumber of persons arrested, further indicating their respective age and charges, if \nany, preferred against them.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSAFE CITY CAMERAS – DATA PROTECTION ACT – PURVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/408",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 408,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/408) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Safe City cameras, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to whether consideration will be given for the \noperation thereof to be placed under the purview of the Data Protection Act and, if so, when \nand, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPUBLIC BEACHES – ASSAULT CASES – PREVENTIVE MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/409",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 409,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/409) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to alleged cases of \nassault at public beaches, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner \nof Police, information as to the reported number thereof since January 2025 to date, \nindicating the – \n(a) \nregion concerned therewith, and \n(b) \nadditional preventive measures being envisaged in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nICAC & FCC – MR N.B., FORMER DIRECTOR-GENERAL – SALARY & FRINGE \nBENEFITS – OVERSEAS MISSIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/410",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 410,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/410) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mr N.B., \n\n150 \n \nformer Director General of the Independent Commission against Corruption and the \nFinancial Crimes Commission, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommission information as to the – \n(a) \ntotal salary and fringe benefits drawn, and  \n(b) \nnumber of official overseas missions effected, indicating the total amount paid in \nterms of per diem and other allowances over the period 2016 to 2024.",
      "answer": "Reply: Mr Navin Beekarry was appointed as Director General of the Independent \nCommission against Corruption in July 2002 and he was paid a monthly salary of Rs275,000. \nHe served as Commissioner of the ICAC from 2002 to 2006. He was appointed as Director \nGeneral of the ICAC on 01 July 2016 for a period of five years with a basic salary of \nRs375,000 monthly, payable 50% in Mauritian rupees and 50% in US dollar. His contract of \nappointment was renewed for a further period of five years with effect from 01 July 2021 \nwith a basic salary of Rs420,000 monthly, payable 50% in Mauritian rupees and 50% in US \ndollar. \nFollowing the establishment of the Financial Crimes Commission in March 2023, Mr \nBeekarry was appointed as Director General of the Commission for a period of three years \nwith effect from 22 March 2023 with a monthly salary of Rs525,000. \nIn regard to part (a) of the question, the Commission has informed that during his \ntenure of office from July 2016 to November 2024, Mr Beekarry was paid a total amount of \nRs61,333,220.00, which includes Rs40,389,194.00 as salary and Rs20,944,026.00 as other \nbenefits. \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, Mr Beekarry undertook 65 official overseas \nmissions over the period 2016 to 2024 at a total cost of Rs17,447,616.37 which includes \nRs8,158,557.49 as airfare and Rs9,289,058.88 as per diem and other allowances. \nROAD TRAFFIC OFFENCES – METROPOLITAN (NORTH) DIVISION – \nCONTRAVENTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025",
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/411",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 411,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/411) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to road traffic offences in the Metropolitan (North) Division, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the number of \ncontraventions booked over the past two years for the offence of – \n\n151 \n \n(a)  causing a vehicle to be parked on a double yellow line;  \n(b)  obstruction on public roads;  \n(c)  failing to wear high visibility clothing by riders and passengers of \nauto/motorcycles, and  \n(d)  failing to comply with traffic sign (Traffic lights).",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that, from January 2023 to 30 \nApril 2025, a total of 1,605 contraventions have been recorded for road traffic offences in the \nMetropolitan (North) Division, as follows – \n(a) \n462 for causing a vehicle to be parked on a double yellow line; \n(b) \n49 for obstruction on public roads; \n(c) \n955 for failing to wear high visibility clothing by riders and passengers of \nmotorcycles or autocycles, and \n(d) \n139 for failing to comply with traffic lights. \nI am further informed that, in addition, Traffic Wardens of the National Land Transport \nAuthority have issued 540 contraventions for the offence of causing a vehicle to be parked on \na double yellow line for the same period. \n \nPUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTIONS – MIDWIFE RECRUITMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/412",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 412,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/412) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre D'or) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to road safety in the regions of Vale, Cap \nMalheureux and Grand Gaube, he will state if consideration will be given for the installation \nof road markings, pedestrian crossings and speed breakers at strategic locations thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, with regard to the region of Vale, I am \ninformed that several traffic and road safety calming measures have been implemented along \n\n40 \n \nthe Vale B12 road in response to reported recurring issues of vehicle over speeding and fatal \nroad accidents along that particular road. These measures include the installation of a speed \ncamera system and the construction of a raised pedestrian speed table. To address on-street \nparking that obstructs traffic flow, thus causing a road safety issue and also hindering \npedestrian movement, single and double yellow lines have been painted at various locations. \nAdditionally, due to limited visibility of vehicles exiting Petit Raffray Road into Vale \nB12 road, the installation of a traffic light system has been proposed at this junction to ensure \nsafer and more efficient turning movements. Furthermore, with a view to enhancing road \nsafety along Sottise B170 road, particularly for school children attending Vale Government \nSchool and the surrounding community, proposed measures include the installation of 40 \nkm/h speed zones, together with the construction of raised speed tables. \nMadam Speaker, as regards the region of Cap Malheureux, double yellow lines have \nbeen implemented along Chemin Vingt Pieds, Mont Choisy, Cap Malheureux B13 road and \nseveral lateral roads to prevent on-street parking, to improve safety at road junctions and to \nfacilitate safer movement of pedestrians. Furthemore, based on road crash and fatal accident \ndata obtained from the Internet Microcomputer Accident Analysis Package (iMAAP) \nsoftware, the installation of raised speed tables has been proposed near key locations, \nincluding Quincaillerie Pavillon, Arya Samaj Mandir and near Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam \nGovernment School at Cap Malheureux. \nThese measures, Madam Speaker, aim to reduce vehicular speeding and to ensure \noverall safety in these regions. Surveys will be conducted at specific locations to assess for \nadditional traffic calming measures such as pedestrian crossings, speed breakers and \ndesignated speed zones to address requests and complaints received from the authorities and \nthe inhabitants. \nMadam Speaker, concerning the village of Grand Gaube, we have identified a black \nspot along Grand Gaube coastal road B14 and same will be treated by means of the \nconstruction of a roundabout. I have to mention to the hon. Member, that this particular black \nspot forms part of the eight black spots in the list of 46 which I intend to visit next week \nduring the road safety week. So, I look forward to meeting you there.  \nMoreso, surveys will be conducted at specific locations to assess the need for painting \nof single and double yellow lines and traffic calming measures such as pedestrian crossings, \n\n41 \n \nspeed breakers and designated speed zones to address requests and complaints received from \nauthorities and their inhabitants. \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed that the TMRSU will carry out a comprehensive \nroad safety inspection along all classified roads at Cap Malheureux and Grand Gaube with a \nview to assessing the existing road infrastructure, identifying safety deficiencies and \nrecommending appropriate engineering measures for implementation. These will include \nimproved traffic signage, safer pedestrian crossings, enhanced road markings, installation of \nguardrails and handrails and traffic calming measures where pedestrian traffic is high; for \ninstance, near schools and places of worship.  \nAs regards existing road markings and signage which have become faint or invisible or \ndamaged, I have had discussions with my colleague, the Minister of Local Government, Mr \nWoochit and a request has been made for his Ministry to work together with the TMRSU due \nto lack of painters thereat at the moment. The time for the unit to recruit painters as same was \nnot done over the last ten years. \nMadam Speaker, the ultimate goal of these road safety inspections and subsequent \ninterventions will be to improve the star ratings of the classified roads, thereby reducing the \nrisk and severity of road crashes. The TMRSU will include all these measures in its work \nprogramme which will be implemented in its framework agreement contract 2025-2027.  \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, supplementary? \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Will the hon. Minister confirm whether \npolice will be deployed in these areas to deter speeding; especially near schools and \nresidential zones? \nMr Osman Mahomed: The police are under the Prime Minister’s Office… \nMadam Speaker: Exactly! \nMr Osman Mahomed: …but what I can do is ask the Traffic Management and Road \nSafety Unit to write a letter requesting for same. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, okay. The hon. First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart! \n \n \n\n42 \n \nPITON - L’AMITIÉ – FATAL ROAD ACCIDENTS – PREVENTIVE MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/413",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 413,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/413) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to road traffic accidents, including fatal \nones, along the Royal Road between Piton and Desjardins, L’Amitié over the past 10 years, \nhe will state the number thereof, indicating the – \n(a) \nmeasures put in place therefor to date, and  \n(b) \nadditional preventive measures being envisaged in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, according to the data obtained from the \niMAAP – which I described earlier – software, covering the period of 1 January 2015 to 31 \nApril 2015, a total of 68 road traffic accidents were recorded along Mont Piton, Rivière du \nRempart A6 road, between Piton, Gokoola, L’Amitié and Desjardins, comprising – \n▪ \n15 fatal ones; \n▪ \n25 serious, and \n▪ \n28 less serious ones. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that reflective \nroad studs known as cat’s eyes, were installed by the TMRSU to enhance nighttime visibility \nand to improve overall driving conditions for road users. Guardrails were also installed along \nseveral road stretches, especially at roadside open drains, embankments and uneven road \nsurfaces to minimise the risk of errant vehicles going off the road, thereby leading to road \naccidents and injuries. Furthermore, painting of multiple slow road markings was \nimplemented by the TMRSU from Gokoola to L’Amitié to deter high speed vehicular \nspeeding. \n In the region of L’Amitié, double yellow lines have been implemented at various \nlocations, along Mont Piton, Rivière du Rempart A6 road and several lateral roads to prevent \non-street parking that obstruct traffic flow, to improve road safety at junctions and to facilitate \nsafe movement of pedestrians on footpaths. There exists a road hump with pedestrian \ncrossing facility along A6 road near L’Amitié Government School to enhance the safety of \nschool children and local inhabitants. \nMadam Speaker, the House may wish to note that in accordance with the Road Traffic \nRegulations 2011, the prescribed limit along classified A road is 80 km/h. However, for that \nconcerned stretch between Piton and Desjardins, there is an existing speed zone with a \nreduced posted speed limit of 60 km/h. To ensure that road users comply with the posted \n\n43 \n \nspeed limit of 60 km/h along Mont Piton, Rivière du Rempart A6 road, the Mauritius Police \nForce must conduct regular speed enforcement exercises in response to recurring issues of \nvehicles over speeding and fatal road accidents. \nMadam Speaker, as regards to part (b) of the question, the following additional \npreventive measures are being envisaged – \n• The TMRSU will carry out a comprehensive road safety inspection along all \nclassified roads at Piton, Gokoola, L’Amitié, Desjardins, Belle Vue Maurel, with \na view to assessing the existing road infrastructure, identifying safety \ndeficiencies and recommending appropriate engineering measures for \nimplementation. These will include improved traffic signage, safer pedestrian \ncrossings, enhanced road markings, installation of guardrails and handrails and \ntraffic calming measures where pedestrian traffic is high, for instance, near \nschools and places of worship like the shivala of Gokoola and near Anou Grandi \nAssociation at L’Amitié. \nThe ultimate goal of these road safety inspections and subsequent interventions will be to \nimprove the road safety star ratings of the classified roads, thereby reducing the risk and \nseverity of road crashes. The TMRSU will include all these measures in its work programme \nlike I mentioned earlier.  \nFurthermore, the TMRSU will be carrying out surveys at specific locations to assess the \nneed for painting of single/double yellow lines and traffic calming measures such as \npedestrian crossings, speed breakers and designated speed zones with regard to requests and \ncomplaints received from the authorities and the inhabitants. \nAs a last line, with a view to ensuring that road users comply with the posted speed of \n60 km/h along Mont Piton, Rivière du Rempart A6 road, it is also proposed that police \nconduct more frequent enforcement like I mentioned earlier. The TMRSU will assist to the \nextent possible. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, supplementary? \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, hon. Minister. Given that we have had 15 fatal accidents \nduring the past ten years, meaning a rate of more than one fatal accident per year, and also, I \nam pretty sure you are aware of the rumbles that existed near the shivala of Gokoola – where, \nlast week, there was another fatal accident – were removed a few years back, I just want the \n\n44 \n \nhon. Minister to enlighten the House whether the measures that your ministry are planning \nwill be implemented by the end of this year, given the seriousness of the situation? Thank \nyou. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes, certainly! We will try our level best. I have to mention to \nthe hon. Member that during the Road Safety Week, which is next week, more measures will \nbe announced. Not only in the region, but around the island. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nDr. Ms Thannoo, please! Last question for this morning!  \nPRE-PRIMARY SCHOOLS – ASSISTANT TEACHERS – RECRUITMENT \nCRITERIA",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/414",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 414,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/414) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the post of \nAssistant Teacher in pre-primary schools, he will state if consideration will be given for the \nwaiving of the 5 credits requirement as a recruitment criterion for those who already possess \na proficiency course from the Mauritius Institute of Education.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, early childhood care and education lay the \ncornerstone for a child’s lifelong journey of discovery, growth and achievement. These \nearlier years are not just formative; they are transformative, shaping the minds and hearts of \nour youngest citizens while laying the foundation for literacy, numeracy and personal \ndevelopment.  \nRecognising this vital stage, this Government remains steadfast in its commitment to \ndelivering inclusive, equitable and high-quality early childhood education for all.  \nWith regard to the post of Assistant Teacher in pre-primary schools, I am informed that \nin August 2023, approval of the then government was sought to the implementation of the \nGrant-in-Aid Formula for the pre-primary sector, whereby it was agreed that a new post of \nAssistant Teacher be created. The incumbents would be required to hold a Cambridge School \nCertificate or a General Certificate of Education.  \n\n45 \n \nAssistant Teachers play a vital role in pre-primary schools by providing individualised \nsupport to pupils who required tailored instruction and pastoral care. They help pupils to \nadapt to the pre-primary environment, assist them in feeding and hygiene. They also support \nteachers in activity planning, creating learning materials, help to supervise and maintain \ndiscipline both indoors and outdoors. \nMadam Speaker, my ministry is proposing to review the criteria, including the \npossibility of waiving the five credits requirement for candidates who already possess a \nrecognised proficiency course from the Mauritius Institute of Education (MIE), particularly \nwhere such qualifications demonstrate the necessary competencies for effective early \nchildhood education. Those who possess MIE proficiency course will not be penalised during \nselection process, especially those who have experience in the early childhood sector. \nI am further informed that currently, there are 267 Assistant Teachers in pre-primary \nschools at the ECCEA. Those Assistant Teachers possess five credits, including Mathematics, \nEnglish and French, respectively, but do not possess Proficiency Course from the MIE. They \nwill have to follow the MIE Teacher’s Certificate soon. In case the five credits requirement \nfor Assistant Teachers will be waived, it will have an impact on the salary accordingly.  \nIt can be noted that the MIE Proficiency Course is lower than the MIE Teacher’s \nCertificate course. Consequently, the Assistant Teachers who do not possess five credits, but \npossess a proficiency course should be graded as Assistant Teachers, will have a different \nsalary scale. \nMadam Speaker, following Les Assises de l'Éducation, which were held from 15 to 17 \nApril 2025, proposals have been received for a comprehensive review of the education sector \nwhich also include the free pre-primary scheme. These include recommendations for adapting \nrecruitment requirements to better reflect the practical skills and specialised training for the \nquality early childhood education. \nMadam Speaker: Are you happy with this? \nDr. Ms Thannoo: Can I ask the hon. Minister to what extent the years of experience \nwill be taken into account with regard to planning for the future salary? Thank you. \nDr. Gungapersad: Their years of experience, definitely, in case they do not have… \n\n46 \n \nMadam Speaker: In pre-primary. \nDr. Gungapersad: In pre-primary. We are talking about the Assistant Teachers in that \nparticular case. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister! \nI will now raise the Sitting for one and a half hours. We will resume at 2.30 p.m. \nAt 1.01 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.32 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Please be seated! \nHon. First Member for Rodrigues, Ms Collet! \nRODRIGUES – SEN SCHOOLS – SCHOOL MANAGERS’ SCHEME OF SERVICE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/415",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 415,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/415) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nEducation and Human Resource whether, in regard to schools registered with the Special \nNeeds Education Authority in Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to where matters stand for the prescription of the scheme of service of the \nschool managers currently posted thereat, indicating the measures being envisaged to ensure \nequitable conditions for these managers in line with national education policies.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that there are \npresently five special education needs institutions in Rodrigues. All of them are registered \nwith the Special Education Needs Authority (SENA). Out of the five SEN institutions, three \nare run by non-government organisations and two are run by the Service Diocésain de \nl'Éducation Catholique (SeDEC).  \nThe National Remuneration Board (NRB) determines the salaries for various positions \nsuch as Teacher, Teacher’s Assistant, Clerk, Carer, Driver and Caretaker for NGOs. With the \nimplementation of the NRB regulations in 2024, the salaries of Teacher, Teacher’s Assistant, \nClerk, Carer, Driver and Caretaker have increased whereas the salary of Managers has \nremained the same, as recommended by the NRB. \n\n47 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that compared to grades published in the NRB \nReport, there is no defined scheme of duty for post of Managers in SEN institutions in \nMauritius as well as in Rodrigues. SEN institutions in Rodrigues are allocated funds by the \nMinistry of Finance through the Rodrigues Regional Assembly.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to highlight that during consultations for the Special \nEducation Needs Institutions Employees (Remuneration) Regulations 2024, my ministry had \nproposed that Managers be included in the category of employee. However, the Ministry of \nLabour and Industrial Relations indicated that Managers of NGOs have not been included in \nthe exercise for the following reasons – \n(i) \nThese were high-profile job positions and holders of same could negotiate their \nsalaries with their boards. \n(ii) \nPeople in these positions were in charge of all the NGOs activities, but not \nlimited to SEN schools.  \nA working committee, including an officer of the Human Resource Section of my \nministry, has been set at the level of the SENA with the view to finding appropriate solutions \non the matter. Same would then be referred to the Ministry of Labour and Industrial Relations \nfor consideration. The relevant duties of Managers, including the duties of Managers in \nRodrigues, will thus be examined at the level of the above working committee prior to the \nsubmission of the recommendations to the Ministry of Labour and Industrial Relations. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you.  \nHon. First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nST. CROIX & VALLÉE DES PRÊTRES REGIONS – DRAIN WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/416",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 416,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Ms Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/416) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to drain works \nbeing undertaken in the region of Institute of Islamic Secular Studies at Le Cornu and at \nVallée des Prêtres, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Land Drainage \nAuthority, information as to where matters stand, indicating the – \n(a) \nname of the contractor/s selected therefor, and  \n(b) \ncost thereof. \n\n48",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, regarding drain works being undertaken in the \nregion of Islamic Secular Studies in Le Cornu, St. Croix, I am informed that the National \nDevelopment Unit had awarded a contract to Sotravic Limitée for an amount of around \nRs140 m. on 22 June 2020. Works were completed in December 2022.  \nHowever, following a heavy rainfall on 17 February 2023, whereby residents in the Le \nCornu region reported flooding in their premises, the Land Drainage Authority recommended \nthat post flooding measures be implemented, namely – \n• \nthe construction of three attenuation basins thereat, and \n• \nthe relocation of a 500-millimetre diameter CWA pipe which passes through the \nnewly constructed drain at Bait Ul Noor Street. \nThese works had to be implemented as during the heavy rainfall it was found that water \nrunning off from the slopes of the mountain carried all sorts of debris which were being \ndeposited in the inlet of the newly constructed drain network, thus obstructing the free flow \nof water. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that the NDU will be the implementing agency \nfor this project. To that effect, it has already initiated land acquisition procedures for an extent \nof 11,680 m2. Letters of offer were issued to two land owners on 14 October 2024 where both \nhad requested for a compensation review. One offer has not been accepted for which the \nNDU has already instructed the Ministry of Housing and Lands to proceed with compulsory \nland acquisition while the other has submitted a report which is under review at the level of \nthe Valuation Department. Construction works will start once the land acquisition has been \ncompleted.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes! \nMs Savabaddy: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Will the hon. Minister agree with \nme that this whole affair requires a full-fledged enquiry to establish responsibilities and take \nappropriate actions as may be warranted? Thank you. \nMr Gunness: As far as the first contract is concerned, the work has been completed \nsince 22 June 2020. Now, we have, after the flooding of 2023, works to be done and land \nacquisition procedure is ongoing. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes! \n\n49 \n \nMETRO EXPRESS LTD – ADVERTISING CONTRACT – BIDS & CONTRACT \n– FEES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/417",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 417,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/417) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the current advertising contract \nwith Metro Express Ltd (MEL), he will, for the benefit of the House obtain from MEL, \ninformation as to the – \n(a)  number of bids received therefor, indicating the – \n(i)  \nname of the successful bidder, and  \n(ii)  terms of the contract,  \n(b)  composition of the – \n(i)  \nBid Evaluation Committee set up therefor, and  \n(ii)  panels which undertook the due diligence exercise and contract \nnegotiations, and  \n(c)  amount of advertising fees received therefor each year.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, from the outset, I wish to inform the \nHouse that all files relating to the Metro Express Project were being administered at the level \nof the Prime Minister’s Office until the day I took office under this Government – then all \nfiles came over to Ministry of Land Transport. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, after perusal of those files available at my Ministry, it has been \nbrought to my attention that the Metro Express Ltd had recourse to a restricted bidding \nexercise where three bids were received for commercialisation of advertising space, that is, \nthe entire extent of the Metro Express Ltd meaning inside and outside the trains, stations, \nbuildings, website and portals, and any Metro lines across the island that may be added to \nPhase 1 and 2, – meaning Phase 3, Phase 4, Phase 5 up to Phase 10, if ever there is one; that \nis the contract that has been signed. Here, I wish to point out taking into consideration the \nvalue of the procurement that is above Rs75 m. over first years according to the agreement, \nan open advertising bidding process would have been more appropriate and beneficial to the \ncompany. \n\n50 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, after scrutiny of the available records, it has been brought to \nmy attention yesterday that the contract signed by the Metro Express Ltd was not according \nto the final vetted document by its legal advisor, that is, the Attorney-General’s Office. This is \na matter of great concern. Following immediate consultations thereto, the latter has informed \nthat the legal implications of not following the legal advice are various and that each clause \nwould now have to be examined to gauge the effect of non-compliance. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed that not complying to the advice of the \nAttorney-General’s Office has led to abusive clauses in the duration of the contract, that is, – \n1. \na first extension of two years over the initial contract of five years subject to a \nsatisfactory report by an independent evaluator, and \n2. \na further renewal of seven years to the sole discretion of the contractor, namely \nAlliance Media, subject to no breach to the terms and conditions. \nAll of the clauses that were struck out by the legal adviser, but somehow found its way into \nthe final document, was signed on 28 August 2020 with Alliance Media by Mr N. K. B. \n(Nayen Kumar Ballah), everybody knows him, he is a public figure and witnessed by Mr D. \nM., the General Manager that bolted away, Mr Das Mootanah, the then Chairman and the \nCEO of MEL, respectively. It is this clause that is most detrimental to the Metro Express Ltd. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this in my opinion is a clear case of irregularity by the then \nmanagement of Metro Express Ltd who will have to answer thereto. I intend to refer the \nmatter to the new Board of the Metro Express Ltd for appropriate actions it deems necessary. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, regarding the Bid Evaluation Committee, I have to mention \nthat the Ministry of Finance who has a representative of the Board on Metro Express Ltd \nconsidered it not appropriate that its representative be part of that committee. Nevertheless, \nthe Bid Evaluation Committee chaired by Mr K. Beekharry (also known as Dev Beekharry) \nproceeded with the exercise. I am, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, tabling the full composition of the \nBid Evaluation Committee. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in so far as revenue from the contract is concerned, Alliance \nMedia shall pay to Metro Express Ltd a monthly rental which is greater of the fixed minimum \namount of or a percentage of the net advertising revenue. The incremental income to be paid \nare as follows – \n1. \nup to Rs50 m., billing and collected per year, 51% payable to Metro Express Ltd; \n\n51 \n \n2. \nfrom 50 to 70 m. billing and collected per year, 65% payable on the additional \nvalue to Metro Express Ltd \n3. \nabove Rs70 m. billing and collected per year 75% on that additional amount of \nvalue to Metro Express Ltd. \nHowever, it is unfortunate that there is no provision in the contract to allow Metro \nExpress Ltd to ascertain how much the contractor is actually deriving from the advertising \ncontract, thus potentially affecting Metro Express Ltd income share, I am further informed. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, according to information received from Metro Express Ltd, a \ntotal of Rs34,265,246 has been paid for advertising over the last four years as per the \nagreement up to now including Rs29,215,118 as minimum guaranteed renumeration and \nRs5,050,128 as income share which is directly proportional on the income derived by the \ncontractor. I am informed that it is when the new board of Metro Express Ltd has been set up \nunder the chairmanship of Dr. Arvin Soonarane, one of the things they looked at was this \nparticular contract.  \nMetro Express Ltd issued a letter on 14 April 2025 to Alliance Media, requesting for \ndetails and evidences supporting revenue to Metro Express Ltd. From then onwards, it has \nbecome evident that something was not quite correct, Metro Express Ltd has since sought \nlegal advice from Attorney-General’s Office. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, M. le président. Le ministre peut-il indiqué à la \nChambre si son ministère envisage de résilier ce contrat avec effet immédiat contenu des \nsommes mirobolantes perçues ? Merci. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes, as a matter of fact, like I mentioned, legal advice was \nsought yesterday and Metro Express Ltd has been told that should Alliance Media not \ndisclosing schedule of net advertising revenue calculations on a quarterly basis, which I \nbelieve should be verifiable because it can declare any sum and then just pay a percentage of \nit – it has to be verifiable, then it is in breach of the contract. \nMs Anquetil: Ma dernière question ! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, one last! \n\n52 \n \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie M. le président. Puis-je demander à l’honorable \nministre si son ministère envisage de saisir la FCC afin qu’une enquête approfondie soit \nmenée pour déterminer s’il y a eu favoritisme pour l’obtention de ce contrat ? Merci. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes, like I said in a first instance, I will refer it to the Board \nbecause the question is fresh, yesterday we discussed extensively about it but I believe if the \nBoard is convinced, the full file which is now resting at the Ministry – I have asked that the \nfile remain at the Ministry – be referred to the Financial Crimes Commission. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Grand’Baie and Poudre d'Or! \nCAP MALHEUREUX - FOOTBALL GROUND",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025",
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/418",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 418,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/418) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’Baie  & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Memorandum of \nUnderstanding signed by the Ministry of Youth and Sports and Evaco Group Mauritius for \nthe construction of a new football playground and related amenities in Cap Malheureux, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the District Council of Rivière du Rempart, \ninformation as to whether the company has obtained all necessary permits therefor, including \nfor any project of animal farm thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that on 17 December 2020, a \nMemorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed between the then Ministry of Youth \nEmpowerment, Sports and Recreation and Evaco Ltd for the construction of a football \nground, petanque court, outdoor gym, kids’ corner and related infrastructure on a plot of land \nof approximately 13,000 square metres at Chemin Vingt Pieds, Cap Malheureux. The project \nis expected to be completed by October 2025. \nSubsequently, it has been brought to my attention that part of the old football ground at \nCap Malheureux was found to be within the property of Evaco Ltd. Initially, Evaco Ltd \nproposed to construct a badminton sports centre on this plot of land. However, this project \ndid not materialise and the company later applied to the Ministry of Housing and Lands for \npermission to develop the endemic garden and a community farm instead.   \nThe land was formally vested to the District Council of Rivière du Rempart on 06 \nAugust 2024. A new MoU was signed on 19 August 2024 between the Council and Evaco \nLtd, clearly stipulating that any development on the land would require the necessary permits.  \n\n53 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, however, it was found that Evaco Ltd had started construction \nworks for an animal shelter without securing a valid BLUP that is, a Building and Land Use \nPermit. Subsequently, the Council issued a Compliance Notice on 22 October 2024.  Evaco \nLtd applied for the required BLUP on the same day but due to objections from the local \nresidents and the absence of clearance from the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste \nManagement and Climate Change, the application was set aside after a hearing held on 30 \nDecember 2024. \nEvaco Ltd obtained the clearance from the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste \nManagement and Climate Change on 15 January 2025 for the upscaling of the farm as well as \nany additional animal rearing on-site, provided that all necessary clearances and permits are \nobtained from the division of veterinary services of the Ministry of Agro-Industry, Food \nSecurity, Blue Economy and Fisheries and the District Council. The promoter was also \nrequested to ensure that the sheds are located further away from the adjacent school so as to \nminimise any source of odour nuisance. \n A third application has been received on 22 April 2025 together with the clearance \nfrom the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change. In view of \nthe fact that the Council has received multiple objections from the local community, a public \nhearing is being scheduled accordingly.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in a letter dated 19 March 2025, the Ministry of Housing and \nLands has informed that it had requested Evaco Ltd to remove the animal farm component \nwhich has not been approved. Accordingly, I am informed that, following a site visit by the \nDistrict Council of Rivière du Rempart on 02 May 2025, several animals namely 9 ponies, 1 \nhorse, 1 camel and 1 goat were found on the premises.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, to-date no permit has been granted by the District Council of \nRivière du Rempart for the operation of an animal farm by Evaco Ltd at Cap Malheureux. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay.  \nHon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet! \nVERDE FRONTIER SOLUTIONS LTD – OPERATION LICENCE – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/419",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 419,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/419) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to Verde \n\n54 \n \nFrontier Solutions Ltd, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Financial \nServices Commission, information as to – \n(a) \nthe date on which operation licence was granted thereto, and \n(b) \nwhether any inquiry has been initiated on the activities thereof and, if so, give \ndetails thereof.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ms Jeetun: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed by the Financial Services Commission that Verde Frontier Solutions Ltd was \ngranted an Investment Adviser (Corporate Finance Advisory) Licence on 10 August 2020, \npursuant to Section 30 of the Securities Act 2005 and Rule 5(1) of the Securities (Licensing) \nRules 2007.  \nWith regards to part (b) of the question, I am informed that the Financial Services \nCommission has been cooperating with the Financial Crimes Commission since 24 February \n2025 in connection with an investigation initiated by the FCC. In the meantime, the FSC has \nalso initiated a regulatory investigation pursuant to Section 44 of the Financial Services Act \n2007 on the activities of Verde Frontier Solutions Ltd which is currently ongoing. \nThank you.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Rookny! \nMr Rookny: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, could the Minister please advise whether, with \nregard to the date of application of Verde and the date on which the licence has been granted, \nthere may have been any fast-track for granting of the said licence and the reason thereof? \nDr. Ms. Jeetun: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that with regard to the date of \nlicence, the application was submitted on 03 July 2020 and the licence was granted on 10 \nAugust 2020. It is difficult for me to say if it has been fast-tracked but it took like a month to \ngrant the licence.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: You have another question? \nMr Rookny: Yes. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay! Let’s give priority to your question.  \nMr Rookny: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, could the Minister please inform the House on \nthe date on which the FSC has instituted enforcement actions or investigation on Verde? \n\n55 \n \nDr. Ms. Jeetun: The investigation was instituted as per the information received from \nthe FSC on 02 May 2025.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you have a question? On the same topic? \nMr Juman:  Same topic! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay! \nMr Juman: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nHon. Minister, can I know whether, as the hon. Member just said, the application was \nsent for views and recommendation on Sunday 09 August and also, if the Minister can tell the \nHouse whether the same officer, Mr Kamal Burun, who gave the licence and now at the head \nof enforcement directorate, is investigating on same? \nDr. Ms. Jeetun: I do not have the information, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, but I will \ndefinitely look into it. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle! \nGRAND PORT DISTRICT COUNCIL – VACANCIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/420",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 420,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/420) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to vacancies at the District \nCouncil of Grand Port, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n (a)  the number of Assistant Chief Executives posted thereat, indicating the number of \nvacant posts, if any, and when same will be filled, and \n(b)  whether a Health and Safety Officer is posted thereat and if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with reference to part (a) of the question, I wish \nto inform the hon. Member that recruitment to the post of Assistant Chief Executive (ACE) in \nLocal Authorities falls under the purview of the Local Government Service Commission, that \nis, the LGSC. All vacancies in this grade are first reported to the Unified Local Government \nService Board which operates under the aegis of my Ministry and thereafter, makes \nrecommendations for filling of posts to the LGSC. \nAt the District Council of Grand Port, there are three funded posts of ACE. Two are \nalready filled on a permanent basis since 01 July 2019 and the second since 04 July 2022. \nThe third post became vacant after Mrs Oozeer Bibi Farozia was promoted as temporarily \nDeputy Chief Executive on 05 May 2023. Since then, Mrs Miniksha Boodhun Rochecouste – \n\n56 \n \nan Office Management Assistant from Municipal Council of Curepipe has been assigned to \nact in the post from 15 April 2025 for a period of 3 months or until it is permanently filled. \nHowever, I am informed that this vacancy cannot be reported to the LGSC due to a \npending appeal for judicial review by the LGSC and Mrs Oozeer and Mrs Dayal at the \nSupreme Court against the determination of the Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal who had \npreviously quashed the decision of the LGSC to appoint Mrs Oozeer and Mrs Dayal to the \npost of Deputy Chief Executive. The case is coming before the Supreme Court on 28 May \n2025. \nAcross all the local authorities, there are 31 funded posts of Assistant Chief Executive, \nof which, 24 are currently filled. Six vacancies have already reported to the LGSC and the \nremaining ones will be reported in due course depending on the outcome of the appeal.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, there is 1 post of Safety \nand Health Officer/Senior Safety and Health Officer at the District Council of Grand Port. \nThis post has remained vacant since the retirement of the previous holder on 12 June 2023. \nThe vacancy was reported to the LGSC on 23 June 2023 and advertised by public notices on \n15 September 2023. The evaluation of the application was completed on 27 December 2023. \nHowever, the recruitment process was delayed because of serious governance problem \nwithin the LGSC under the previous government. In particular, the former Chairperson of the \nCommission took all decision-making powers into his own hands and excluded all the other \nmembers of the Commission. This action was a clear violation of constitutional principles, \ncontrary to the established philosophy of the LGSC. \nAs a result of these improper practices, the institution’s work was undermined and the \ncritical posts remained unfilled for nearly two years. Worse still, the failure to complete the \nselection exercise before the dissolution of the National Assembly in October 2024, as \nconfirmed by correspondents dated 17 December 2024, further obstructed the recruitment \nprocess. These events reflect a lack of good faith and administrative will on the part of the \nprevious government. \nTo comply with Section 30 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) 2005 \nwhich requires a full-time Safety and Health Officer for an organisation of 500 to 2,000 \nworkers, temporary arrangements were made. An officer, Mr Babajee, holding a BSc (Hons.) \nin Occupational Safety and Health Management, has been assigned the duties of Safety and \n\n57 \n \nHealth Officer at the District Council of Grand Port since last week until the vacancy is filled. \nThe ministry issued the letter of assignment on 02 May 2025.  \nThe Ministry of Labour and Industrial Relations was consulted, and similar temporary \narrangement has been made in other local authorities facing the same issue. Efforts are \nongoing to register these officers under Section 29 (1) of the OSHA 2005 so they may legally \nact in this capacity.  \nI wish to assure the House that the post will be re-advertised soon and the recruitment \nprocess will be conducted urgently and transparently to ensure that the post is filled at the \nearliest opportunity. My Ministry is committed to restoring good governance and ensuring the \nhealth and safety of employees in local authorities is in full compliance with the law. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you have a supplementary? \nMr Ramdass: Yes! I understand from the hon. Minister’s reply in respect to part (a) of \nthe question that one Ms Rochecouste has been appointed on a temporary basis for a period \nof three months as from 15 May 2025. Would the hon. Minister be in a position to confirm \nthat upon the expiry of these three months, that is, on 15 August 2025, Ms Rochecouste \nwould be renewed at the same post, at the same place in order to ensure the continuity of the \nservices provided by the District Council? \nMr Woochit: It will be renewed until the post is filled by the LGSC. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question, hon. Ramdass! \nFSC – PRUDENTIAL & FINANCIAL INSPECTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/421",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 421,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/421) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the \nregulatory and supervisory framework of the Financial Services Commission, she will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain therefrom information as to the number of – \n(a) \non-site and off-site prudential inspections, and \n(b) \nfinancial conduct inspections carried out, if any, since 2021 to date.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ms Jeetun: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed by the Financial Services Commission that the commission has conducted, during \nthe period 2021 to date, a total of 1,753 on-site inspections relating to anti-money laundering \nand combatting the financing of terrorism, prudential and conduct matters, out of which, 39 \nare related to on-site prudential inspections. \n\n58 \n \nMoreover, 1,354 off-site or desk prudential inspection comprising mainly review of \naudited financial statements, capital adequacy and actuarial evaluation reports were carried \nout.  \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the FSC that 36 on-site \nconduct inspections have been carried out triggered by complaints and whistleblowing. The \nremaining 1,678 on-site inspections conducted by the FSC were principally focused on \nAML/CFT. My colleagues may wish to recall that in February 2020, Mauritius was placed on \nthe FATF Grey List as a result of strategic deficiencies with regard to its AML/CFT \nFramework. The FATF identified Mauritius should continue to work on its action plan to \naddress its strategic deficiencies, including the effective implementation of a risk-based \nsupervision plan for the FSC. \nSubsequently, the Financial Services Commission updated its AML/CFT risk-based \nsupervision framework, which is being used to assess risk and compliance and rate licensees \naccordingly. Based on their respective risk rating, licensees are identified for AML/CFT focus \ninspections to be conducted for each yearly cycle, that is, from March to February. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, for the year 2025-2026, the FSC has planned 323 on-site \ninspections to keep the AML/CFT risk understanding of its financial institutions up to date. \nThank you. \nMr Ramdass: It would seem that in the past few years, there has been a high \nconcentration on AML/CFT inspections as opposed to prudential inspections. This may be the \ncause of a rise in the number of complaints to the Ombudsperson for Financial Services. \nWould the hon. Minister consider the possibility of looking into the matter so that remedial \nactions are taken with a view to preserve this sector in Mauritius? \nDr. Ms Jeetun: I totally agree with the hon. Member, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. We are \nreviewing the strategic way FSC has been functioning. There has been a lot of focus on \nAML/ CFT due to being put on the Grey List. But we need to have a harmony and balance in \nall our operations. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Juman! \nMr Juman: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Hon. Minister, I do not know whether \nyou are aware, a non-technical staff is actually heading the Licensing Department at the FSC. \nA non-technical staff, a former HR, is heading the Licensing Department at the FSC. Are you \naware of it? \n\n59 \n \nDr. Ms Jeetun: I will look into the matter. I do not get into the operational matters of \nthe regulatory body. \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Sit down, hon. Juman! \nDr. Ms Jeetun: You must understand that it is a regulator, and the Minister does not \ninterfere in a regulator’s functioning as such. We do not have the power to interfere in the \nregulator’s functioning as per the law. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay! \nThe hon. Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East! \nBEL AIR, NEW MARKET FAIR – STALLS ALLOCATION – PROCEDURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/422",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 422,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/422) Mr R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the traders presently operating \nat the privately-run Bel Air old market fair, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \nthe District Council of Flacq, information as to where matters stand as to the second \nexpression of interest launched on 01 October 2024 for the allocation of stalls to the traders at \nthe newly constructed market fair, indicating the measures being taken to expedite this \ntransition.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, further to my previous reply to Parliamentary \nQuestion B/65 on Tuesday 17 December 2024, I wish to provide the House with a brief and \nupdated process regarding the relocation of remaining traders from the privately-run Bel Air \nold market fair to the newly constructed market fair facility.  \nThere are 340 traders who are operating at the privately-run Bel Air Market. Following \nthe launch of an Expression of Interest (EOI) on 19 April 2024, 145 traders were successfully \nrelocated to the new market.  \nHowever, around 195 traders, either did not show any interest in the relocation or failed \nto meet the criteria outlined in the expression of interest. Out of a total of 515 available stalls \nat the new market, 321 were allocated following the first EOI. \nSince then, 18 traders surrendered their stalls and seven more traders did so earlier this \nyear leaving a balance of 219 stalls currently available for allocation, according to \ninformation provided by the Council.  \n\n60 \n \nAs regard to the main question to expedite the relocation of the remaining traders, a \nsecond Expression of Interest was launched on 01 October 2024 pursuant to section 57 of the \nLocal Government Act 2011. As at closing of application date on 04 November 2024, a total \nof 353 applications were received and referred to the Bid Evaluation Committee (BEC) for \nassessment. I am pleased to inform the hon. Member that the evaluation exercise was \ncompleted on 17 April 2025. The Council will now proceed with the drawing of lots for the \nallocation of stalls this week on Thursday, 08 May 2025 in the presence of all eligible \napplicants, two Court Ushers from the Supreme Court, and the Principal Internal Control \nOfficer together with other senior officers of the Council. \nUpon completion of the allocation exercise, successful bid applicants will be required \nto pay the prescribed market fees and sign the occupation contract, accordingly. All \nsuccessful applicants will be expected to occupy their respective stalls as from 01 June 2025. \nI wish to assure the House that my Ministry is working in close collaboration with the District \nCouncil of Flacq to expedite this transition and to ensure that all eligible and interested \ntraders are fairly accommodated within the shortest possible timeframe. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES – CHILDREN’S COURT – ESTABLISHMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/423",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 423,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/423) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Attorney-\nGeneral whether, in regard to the Children’s Court, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Master and Registrar, information as \nto the number of sessions thereof held in Rodrigues since its coming into \noperation to date, indicating the number of cases heard, and \n(b) \nstate if consideration will be given for the establishment thereof in Rodrigues.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Housing and Lands (Mr S. Mohamed): Thank you, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker. Section 3(1) of the Children’s Court Act provides for the establishment of the \nChildren’s Court and furthermore, Section 3(4) of the said Act makes provision for the \nChildren’s Court to sit in such place and at such time as the Chief Justice may direct. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I have been informed according to information \nobtained from the Master and Registrar that there has not been any sitting of the Children’s \nCourt in Rodrigues as the Children’s Court does not sit in Rodrigues. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question and in regard to the \nspecialised nature and jurisdiction of the Children’s Court, consideration may be given for the \n\n61 \n \nestablishment thereof in Rodrigues. Accordingly, Government will act in consultation with \nthe honourable Chief Justice for any decision to be taken thereof. \nNotwithstanding the establishment of the Children’s Court in Rodrigues, I wish to \ninform the House that any matter involving a child is dealt with by the Court of Rodrigues as \nthe Magistrate for Rodrigues shall, within Rodrigues, have the same powers and jurisdiction \nas conferred on every District Magistrate in Mauritius. And the District and Intermediate \nCourt (Civil Jurisdiction) Act and The District and Intermediate Court (Criminal Jurisdiction) \nAct, the Criminal Procedure Act and the Court’s Act shall extend to Rodrigues with sections \n2 and 3 of Court Rodrigues Jurisdiction Act. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Minister, just for the record, you are the Acting Attorney \nGeneral.  \n Mr Mohamed: The Acting Attorney General, yes. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Just for the record. \nMr François: If you will allow me, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, is the hon. Acting \nAttorney General aware that in the absence of Children’s Court or even a probation home or \nhostels in Rodrigues, girls, minors with behavioural concerns have to be sent to Mauritius \nthus, certainly, aggravating their situation. Will he look into the matter with local \nstakeholders, with Rodrigues Court and others, for urgent remedial action thereof, maybe as a \nproposal for next budget itself? \nMr Mohamed: I have taken good note of the observations of the hon. Member. I shall \napprise the substantive Minister of same and I shall also apprise other members of \nGovernment, relevant Ministries of his remarks and this will be looked into. \nMr François: Being given that, there is also no Bail and Remand Court during \nweekends in Rodrigues, will the hon. Acting Attorney General also look into the matter for \nremedial action thereof? \nMr Mohamed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, you will realise, and the hon. Member as well, \nthat this does not form part of the question as far as Bail and Remand Court is concerned. \nHowever, in a spirit of trying to be helpful obviously, we will look into all these issues since \nit is a relevant issue, I do agree – not to the question, but it is an important issue. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. The hon. First Member for Savanne \nand Black River. \n\n62 \n \nMAURITIUS POST LTD – RECRUITMENTS 2015-2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025",
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/424",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 424,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/424) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nMinister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in regard to \nthe Mauritius Post Ltd., he will for benefit of the House, obtain therefrom information as to \nthe number of officers recruited thereat over the past ten years.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that over the last 10 years, \nMauritius Post Ltd. has recruited 462 officers in total out of which 106 officers have already \nresigned. With your permission, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I will now list the number of \nrecruitments made for each year from 2015 to 2024 – \n(i) \n2015: 56 \n(ii) \n2016: 17 \nThe Deputy Speaker: You can file it if you want. \nDr. Ramtohul: I will file that but I would still like the attention of the House with \nregards to last 3-4 years, with your permission. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay. \nDr. Ramtohul: So – \n(iii) 2021: 14 \n(iv) 2022: 35 \n(v) \n2023: 6 \n(vi) and for the House, 2024: 181 officers have been recruited by the Mauritius Post \nLtd. \nIt is good to note that the then Minister for IT emanated from Constituency No.9 and \nout of this 181 people, 99 were recruited from Constituency No.9 and they talked about \nmeritocracy in that government. \nAn hon. Member: Laptop eklate laba ! \n(Interruptions) \nDr. Ramtohul: Not just that, linn manday so prop leader, linn donn li zis 58, kouma \nzot abitie fer without meritocracy and linn manday so bann lezot koleg ousi. How can it be \npossible that 99 people out of Constituency No.9 only met the requirements for that position.  \nMs Anquetil: Incroyable! \nDr. Ramtohul: Are we fooling ourselves or we fooling the public? So, they ended \nfooling at the public for so long. \n\n63 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we are currently not sure whether the procedures and the \nprinciples of meritocracy was respected or not, as part of that recruitment process since the \nqueries addressed – and I say it loud – to the HR Manager of Mauritius Post Ltd were not \nanswered to satisfactorily. The Board, which is an independent entity, will be called upon to \ntake the necessary actions. An audit exercise may also not be excluded at this stage.  \nAdditionally, I am informed that as at June 2024, the Mauritius Post Ltd has incurred a \nloss of Rs86 m. – like so many other institutions under the rule of the MSM Government. \nFurther, the company had a shareholder’s deficit of around 2 billion and the State of the \nEconomy actually revealed that the pension deficit amounted to Rs2.6 billion and this did not \nprevent them from recruiting at will, just for political mileage. As hon. Shakeel Mohamed \npointed it earlier, to have some cheap political points out of the ailing population. But again, \nthat was not enough, they still had the liberty and audacity to go and acquire a new vehicle \nfor the then new CEO at Rs3.6 m. \nThere is this company called Proguard Ltd which has a contract of Rs1.2 m. every \nmonth for delivering remittance, parcels and emails whether or not services are delivered. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Minister, can you please stick to the question. \nDr. Ramtohul: I am sticking to the question. \nThe Deputy Speaker: We are talking about officers who were recruited for the past ten \nyears. \nDr. Ramtohul: Yes. I am sticking to the question. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, please!  \nDr. Ramtohul: And I believe that I have, by now, answered the question. \n(Interruptions) \nUnless there is a supplementary, thank you! \nAn hon. Member: That’s a good one! \nMr Babajee: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, will the Minister be in the position to enlighten \nthis House on the number of vacancies we had pre-recruitment and whether, there have been \nnew positions created to recruit those people and if they met all the training required? \nDr. Ramtohul: Okay, let’s start with the training element. It seems contracts for \ntraining were allocated on the basis of MoUs between the Mauritius Post Ltd and the NPCC. \n\n64 \n \nThough they are both Government entities, training contracts were actually allocated at the \nback of MoUs, which we believe, is against the concept of good governance.  \nNow, having said that, with regard to the supplementary question, I do not have the \ninformation with me at the moment but I will certainly table same. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you! The hon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles \nand Souillac! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 13 – CREMATION GROUNDS & CEMETERIES – SPACE \nAVAILABILITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/425",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 425,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/425) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to cremation grounds \nand cemeteries in Constituency No. 13, Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac, he will state if the \nMinistry has conducted any survey to assess the availability of space to accommodate the \nneeds of all religions and faiths in the short and medium terms thereat, indicating if \nconsideration will be given to increase the extent thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Ministry of Local \nGovernment that in Constituency No. 13, there are nine cremation grounds which are all \ntraditional pyres located at – \n• Grand Bois; \n• Bois Chéri; \n• Rivière du Poste (Camp Rabaud and Camp Siaje); \n• Tyack; \n• Camp Diable; \n• L’Escalier, and \n• Benares.  \nThere are three incinerators situated at Grand Bois, Souillac, Chamouny which are used \nmostly by the Hindu faiths and occasionally by Christian faiths.  \nThere are three cemeteries which are located at L’Escalier, Camp Diable and Grand \nBois.  \nI am also informed that the cemetery at L’Escalier is almost saturated and I thank the \nhon. Member for this question. And there is no additional land for further extension. The \n\n65 \n \nDistrict Council of Savanne is indeed looking for a suitable portion of land to extend the \ncemetery.  \nIn 2022, the Ministry of Local Government and Disaster Risk Management requested \nthe Ministry of Housing and Land Use Planning to confirm the status of two identified plots \nof land adjacent to the cemetery and to the village market. Both are private properties. \nProcess has started for the acquisition and I can assure my hon. friend that I will be following \nthis matter closely to ensure that the process is completed and we will be working together \nwith my hon. colleague, the Minister of Local Government in order to implement this project. \nAs regards the cemetery at Camp Diable which caters for burial of all religions and \nfaiths, we have received, at the level of my Ministry, no request for additional land. However, \nif there is the need for same, I can assure the hon. Member and all the colleagues, hon. \nMembers, and the inhabitants of Constituency No. 13 – that happens to be the first \nConstituency I was elected in – that I will be personally looking into the matter and try to find \nsolutions.  \nWith regard to the cemetery found at Grand Bois, there is indeed an urgent need to \nextend its area. A portion of freehold land found adjacent to the existing cemetery has been \nidentified already, surveyed and consultations are already ongoing to assess the suitability of \nthe land in view of the potential acquisition.  \nAnd for that process, in March of 2025, views of various Ministries have been sought; \nthe Ministry of Environment, Health, Water Resources Unit, Land Drainage Authority and on \n8 April, the Water Resources Unit stated that it had no objection to the proposed extension of \nthe existing cemetery. So, now the planning section in my Ministry is awaiting the views of \nthe Ministry of Environment, Health, and LDA prior to submitting planning views. \nSo, obviously all my colleague Ministers will be looking into it in order to try to \nexpedite matters. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. The hon. First Member for Piton and Rivière du \nRempart! \nSSRN HOSPITAL – CASUALTY & ADMISSION – AVERAGE WAITING TIME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "friday-28-february-2025",
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/426",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 426,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/426) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam \nNational (SSRN) Hospital, he will state the average waiting time upon a patient being \n\n66 \n \nadvised at the casualty or unsorted department for admission and the time admitted to the \nward.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that no survey has been carried out \nto assess the average waiting time taken for a patient who is advised at the casualty or \nunsorted department for admission and the time he/she is admitted to the ward. \nI am advised that the waiting time for a patient who is advised by a doctor for \nadmission and the time the patient reaches the admission ward depends on different situations \nand these are as follows – \n▪ \nInsofar as emergency cases are concerned and that require immediate \nmanagement and admission to Intensive Care Unit or High Dependency Unit, \nadmissions are not delayed. As such, the admitting doctor or the emergency \nphysician will accompany the patient to the admission ward and handover to the \nICU or HDU doctor. For example, intracranial bleed patient, diabetic ketoacidosis \npatient, ectopic pregnancy patient etc.  \n▪ \nFor cases of acute ischemic stroke patients and thrombosis are transferred \nimmediately to the Stroke Unit at Victoria Hospital by SAMU for a thrombolytic \nmanagement. This process may take 30 minutes to one hour before admission to \nthe Stroke Unit. Note that the ideal time to reach the Stroke Unit should be less \nthan four and a half hours from onset of symptoms. \n▪ \nFor cases needing emergency surgery, patients are sent directly to the operation \ntheatre where surgeons are already available to carry out the intervention. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed that delays may occur in cold and semi-\nurgent cases needing admissions. The waiting time depends on several factors that include the \nfollowing – \n1. \nBlood and X-Ray investigations being requested prior to admission; \n2. \nAvailability of beds in the admitting ward; \n3. \nPatients with special needs needing immediate attention, such as elderly people, \npregnant women, disabled, and children, and \n4. \nThe number of patients at peak time and off-peak time. \nI wish to inform the House that the situation prevailing in hospitals which the present \nGovernment has taken note of, is in deplorable state. However, as a responsible Government, \n\n67 \n \nwe will not give up and will leave no stone unturned to improve the services in our hospitals \nfor the benefit of our population. \nIn addition, we are also looking for the ways and means to try to reinforce the \nmanpower in these hospitals. \nDr. Prayag: I wish to thank the hon. Minister for his reply. No survey has been carried \nout during the past ten years, let’s say, and there is a critical time of 4.5 hours that an \nischemic stroke patient should be managed. However, I find myself with a complaint from a \npatient dated 2 May, last week, which I am sure the Minister will find in the records of the \nMinistry, where the husband of the complainant had an ischemic stroke, got admitted at 5 \na.m., in the chemotherapy ward of the hospital; probably because of a way of camouflaging \nthe waiting time in the hospital. Blood tests take one hour of waiting and in case of \nemergency cases, it is more. The patient had to wait nine hours before the latter got \ntransferred from the Chemotherapy Unit to the ward and that is why there was this pilot \nproject of a transitional ward in Jeetoo Hospital. \nI wish to ask the hon. Minister, whether we could urgently try to implement a \ntransitional ward so that patients who are on their feet, who do not need to be on the bed, can \nbe in transition to a ward where they can wait for their prescriptions or other relevant papers. \nMeanwhile, other patients who have to be admitted urgently have their place instead of being \ntransferred to chemotherapy wards in emergency cases. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Do you want to answer? \nMr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I do not deny the fact there are hundreds of cases \nof negligence in our hospitals and every day, I have the habit of receiving dozens of people \nand I look into cases personally every day in the morning, and the hon. Member knows very \nwell.  \nSecondly, as far as the question of a having a special ward to keep patients waiting \nthere, I must say that a policy decision has to be taken at the level of the Ministry. It should \nnot be for one particular hospital; it has to be for all the hospitals but I can assure the House \nthat maximum care is being taken these days, and I have no doubt that in the weeks or \nmonths to come, all the petty problems which had been occurring here and there in hospitals, \nwill be solved. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you have one question? \n\n68 \n \nMr Juman: Merci, M. le président… \nThe Deputy Speaker: We are talking about Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam Hospital. \nMr Juman: Yes, M. le ministre, est-ce que vous êtes au courant qu’il y a un manque \naccru de personnel à l’hôpital SSRN et qu’est-ce que vous comptez faire pour pâlir à ce \nmanquement ? \n Mr Bachoo: Unfortunately, for the last ten years, no nursing officers were recruited \nand there is a lack of 1,500 nursing officers and 300 doctors in our hospitals. And probably in \nthe forthcoming budget, we will find room to at least recruit 200 nursing officers. \nProbably, by next week, we are going to advertise in order to recruit doctors on \ncontract. So, I can assure the hon. Member that I am aware of the problem. That is the reason \nwhy I cannot accuse the doctors who are serving in the hospitals because they are \noverworked. We have to understand their situation. But by means of pleading to those doctors \nrepeatedly, we are encouraging them to do the work in the meantime. In the months to come, \nprobably, we will be having additional doctors in hospitals. \nI would also like to inform the House that about 30-35 specialist doctors have left the \ngovernment service to be in the private sector. That is another problem for us.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes! \nBELLE ROSE MARKET – PROPOSED RELOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/427",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 427,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/427) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the proposed relocation of the \nBelle Rose Market in Quatre Bornes, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nMunicipal Council of Quatre Bornes, information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Belle Rose Fair, previously known as Doyen \nFair, was originally held in the open-air along the former railway track at Avenue Doyen, \nBelle Rose. Following the implementation of Metro Express Project, the fair was relocated, \non 15 September 2019, to a new site at Victoria Avenue, Quatre Bornes.  \nThe current site is State land leased to MJTI Properties Co. Ltd. Cabinet approved a \nlease agreement between MJTI Properties Co. Ltd and the Municipal Council of Quatre \n\n69 \n \nBornes for an area of 5,200 m2 at an annual rental of Rs1.1 m. The fair has been operating at \nthis location since its relocation.  \nI wish to assure the hon. Member that my Ministry is actively following up on this \nproject as a matter of priority. We are treating it on a fast-track basis and giving it due \nconsideration to ensure that all administrative and procedural steps are completed promptly \nso as to facilitate the development of a permanent market infrastructure for the benefit of \ntraders and community.  \nIt is regrettable that despite the site being operational since 2019, no significant \nprogress was made by the previous administration to secure the required land vesting or to \nmove forward with construction.  \nProcedures are now being accelerated to transfer the land from the State Investment \nCorporation to the Ministry of Housing and Lands, which will then vest the land to my \nministry. Currently, 5,400 m2 of the site is being used as a bus holding area on weekdays and \nSaturdays, and as a market fair on Sundays.  \nAccording to correspondence dated 20 March 2025, the State Investment Corporation \nhas returned the leasehold rights to the Ministry of Housing and Lands. Compensation has \nalso been agreed for structures on the site, covering an area of around 6,000 m2.  \nThe Victoria Fair currently consists of 277 stalls across various sections, including \nvegetable, food, haberdashery, flowers, eggs, fish and spice. Of these, 232 stalls are occupied \nwhile 45 remain vacant. The fair operates only on Sundays from six o’clock to noon. Police \nassistance is provided during operation to regulate traffic and hawking activities. Basic \nfacilities, including toilets for male, female and disabled persons are available. Parking is also \nprovided at the nearby Marie Marot Activity Centre.  \nIt is unfortunate that although the previous government had earmarked Rs2 m. for \nconsultancy services as far back as 2021, and two separate procurement exercises were \nlaunched, one in 2021 and another in 2022, both of them failed due to poor planning and lack \nof responsiveness. No meaningful action was taken after that. Despite the allocation of Rs70 \nm. in the Public Sector Investment Programme over several years, construction has never \nstarted.  \n\n70 \n \nThe current administration in office since November 2024 has taken decisive steps to \nrelease the project. A design-build approach was approved by the Council’s Executive \nCommittee and the Public Infrastructures Department has finalised the project specification. \nHowever, works can only begin once the land is officially vested. My ministry is working \ndiligently with all concerned institutions to expedite this final step and initiate construction \nwithout delay.  \nThe absence of meaningful progress in this essential infrastructure over the last five \nyears highlights the delays and inaction of the previous regime. The new Government is \ncommitted to change this situation and to deliver a permanent, well-equipped and dignified \nmarket place for our traders and the community over there. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, do you have a supplementary? \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, M. le président. Can the hon. Minister inform the \nHouse, why, despite the allocation of R 70 millions in the last budget, construction has still \nnot started?  \nMr Woochit: As I just said, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, although Rs70 m. has been \nearmarked in the Budget 2024-2025 for the construction of the permanent market, the project \nis still awaiting completion of the land vesting procedures. Procedures are only now being \naccelerated to transfer the land from the State Investment Corporation to the Ministry of \nHousing, which will then vest the land to the Ministry of Local Government within two \nmonths. \nMs Anquetil: Last one! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, last one! \nMs Anquetil: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Given that only 232 out of 277 \nstalls are currently occupied, will the Minister inform the House what are the measures being \ntaken to support the vendors and ensure full occupancy of the remaining spaces? \nMr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in fact, an expression of interest was launched \non 17 March 2025 to allocate the remaining 45 stalls, with the closing date set on 18 April \n2025. The evaluation process is currently undergoing. \n\n71 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. \nHon. Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nMERCANTILE & MARITIME GROUP– PETROLEUM PROCUREMENT \nCONTRACT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/428",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 428,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/428) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the \ncontract for the procurement of petroleum products from Mercantile & Maritime Group, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the State Trading Corporation, information as \nto the terms and conditions thereof, including the financial cost and table a copy thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Yeung Sik Yuen: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that on 05 May 2023, the \nState Trading Corporation (STC) launched an open international bidding exercise for the \nsupply of white oil for the period of 01 August 2023 to 31 July 2024.  \nAt opening of bids, on 26 May 2023, seven bids were received wherein the lowest offer \nwas from OQ Trading Ltd. On 07 June 2023, the Board of STC approved that the contract for \nthe supply of white oil, for the period of 01 August 2023 to 31 July 2024, be awarded to OQ \nTrading Ltd, the lowest substantially responsive bidder. \nI am further informed that prior to the award of the contract, the STC received a direct \noffer from Mercantile and Maritime Holdings W.L.L., offering lower premiums on all four \ncategories of white oil products and several competitive advantages, according to the then \nSTC Board and the then government. Following the due diligence done by the STC and the \nthen government, the contract was awarded to the Mercantile & Maritime Group. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that a few days ago, at their \nrequest, I met with the two representatives of OQ Trading Ltd, in presence of my Permanent \nSecretary, wherein they informed of disturbing facts with regard to the above-mentioned \nprocurement exercise. \nThis is a matter of concern and gives rise to many doubts regarding the way things were \ndone under the previous government. This gives additional justification as to why a few \nmonths ago, Government had requested that the Financial Crimes Commission (FCC) \ninvestigate the whole process. \n\n72 \n \nIn parallel, I have already instructed for an audit exercise to be carried out at the STC \nand in particular, on all major procurement exercises done for the last ten years. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with respect to the above-mentioned direct procurement \nexercise for petroleum products from Mercantile and Maritime Group – \na) \nI am advised that the whole procurement process is currently under investigation \nby FCC, in this regard, I stand advise that it would not be appropriate to disclose \nthe requested details at this stage so as not to prejudice the integrity of the \nongoing investigative process; \nb) \nin addition, given the ongoing FCC investigation, any tabling of contractual \ndocuments is deferred pending the outcome of the said enquiry. \nI wish to assure the House that my Ministry and the State Trading Corporation are fully \ncooperating with the relevant authorities and stand committed to upholding transparency, \naccountability and the rule of law. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. The Minister has stated that there is an enquiry at \nthe FCC and we don’t want to prejudice the enquiry. You can put your question but then the \nMinister will decide whether he wants to answer or not. \nMr A. Duval: Yes, the hon. Minister will remember when he was sitting in the \nOpposition that this was a subject of a Private Notice Question at the time for making public \nthe contract. The financial cost to this day has never been made public, forget the contract, \nthe financial cost. So, can the Minister at least, like the question asked, give to the people of \nMauritius an indication as to the financial cost of this contract, how much was the contract \nvalue for, whether it was for the acquisition of petroleum product together with the transport \nand other cost and what was the amount for that? We have the right to know. \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I believe that the contract was amounted \nto almost Rs30 billion. \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Last question, please! \nMr Jhummun: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have heard the hon. Minister referring to \ndisturbing facts while he had a meeting with the representatives of OQ Trading. For the \n\n73 \n \nbenefit of this House and the whole nation, can he tell us what he meant by disturbing facts? \nThank you. \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: M. le président, quand j’ai rencontré les deux représentants de \nOQ Trading Ltd, j’étais choqué. Ce que les deux représentants m’ont confirmé, ils m’ont dit \nqu’il y a eu quelqu’un qui a pris contact avec eux depuis Dubaï, ils ont demandé de l’argent \nen échange… \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Voler ! Dan valiz! \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Et je suis content d’avoir eu cette question pour que je puisse \nrépondre et puisque OQ Trading n’a pas accédé à la demande de cette personne, \nmalheureusement, il n’a pas eu le contrat. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Last one! \nMr Beechook: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to ask the Minister whether, it is an \nestablished or admissible practice to set aside a tender exercise and go for direct bidding, \nhowever low the offer may be, in history or in the usual practice at the STC? \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this is not a good practice as we know \nhow the previous government was working. Everything was possible with them. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Just one last question! \nMr A. Duval: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, may I ask the hon. Minister in the name of \nchange…  \n(Interruptions) \n…does the Minister now undertake, because he has said because of an enquiry, he \ncannot make it public even though a few months ago he had himself requested that… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question! \nMr A. Duval: The question is in the name of change; does he undertake to answer \nParliamentary Questions for future contracts for the acquisition of petroleum product and to \ngive all details and not to hide behind confidentiality clauses? Do you give that undertaking? \n\n74 \n \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: I cannot give undertaking or whatever. I will answer whenever it \nis possible to answer. \nAn hon. Member: Linn diman kas ta! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay! The hon. Third Member for Montagne Blanche and \nGrand River South East! \nTROU D’EAU DOUCE VILLAGE – ROAD TRAFFIC CONGESTION – \nPARKING FACILITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/429",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 429,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/429) Mr R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to road traffic congestion and lack of \nparking facilities at Trou D’Eau Douce village, he will state the measures being envisaged to \naddress same.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Thank you. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that \nrecurrent traffic congestion occurs along Belle Mare, Trou d’Eau Douce Road B59 at Trou \nd’Eau Douce for the following reasons – \n1. \nCommercial buildings have been constructed along B59 Road but it is to be noted \nthat parking facility have not been provided.  \n2. \nOn-street parking has been observed despite the presence of yellow lines. This is \na recurrent feature in highly built-up areas with lack of adequate parking \nfacilities.  \n3. \nNot enough enforcement by local authorities and the Mauritius Police Force \nresults in even meagre parking facilities being taken up by illegal structures, \nthereby leading to recurrent on-street parking. \nI am further informed, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that with a view to relieving the traffic \ncongestion at Trou d’Eau Douce, the Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit of my \nMinistry has, as a short-term measure, provided single and double yellow lines at the village \nof Trou d’Eau Douce near RCA School and MCB to prohibit inconsiderate on-street parking. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, for the long term, the following measures are being proposed – \n1. \nthe District Council of Flacq to ensure that all requirements of planning policy \nguidelines with regards to parking provisions are met prior to issue of building \nand land use permit; \n\n75 \n \n2. \nthe Police should ensure strict enforcement, and \n3. \nthe District Council of Flacq should ensure that parking facilities are provided for \ndevelopment projects. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, the hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre \nBornes! \nNATIONAL TRANSPORT CORPORATION – FINANCIAL SITUATION – 2015 \nTO 2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/430",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 430,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/430) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the National Transport \nCorporation, he will for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom information as to the \nfinancial situation thereof for each of the financial years 2015 to 2024 and table copies of the \nfinancial statements thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that the \nfinancial statements for Financial Year January 2015 to December 2015, were tabled at the \nNational Assembly on 24 November 2024. Regarding the financial statements for Financial \nYear 2016-2017, the statements have been audited and finalised recently by the National \nAudit Office, same has been transmitted to the Clerk of the National Assembly last week for \ntabling. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as I stated in my reply to PQ B/66 earlier this year, instructions \nwere given to the National Transport Corporation to expedite finalisation of pending accounts \nand the new Board of the NTC was entrusted with the responsibility to ensure that all \naccounts be finalised and audited as a matter of priority. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that necessary actions were taken by the Board \nof the NTC, and subsequently, the final statements for the remaining years, that is, 2018 to \n2024, have already been prepared and submitted to the National Audit Office for auditing. \nI am further informed that the accounts for the Financial Years 2017-2018 and 2018-\n2019 are currently being audited by the National Audit Office and the auditing of the \naccounts for the remaining financial years 2019 to 2024 will follow. The audited financial \nstatements will thereafter be tabled to this august Assembly after completion of the exercise. \n\n76 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, regarding the financial situation of the NTC, I have to inform \nthe House that the last three reports audited by the National Audit Office were all provided \nwith a qualified opinion, meaning that the completeness and accuracy of the information \nsubmitted by the NTC could not be ascertained by the National Audit Office, inter-alia, \nregarding the inventories, the cash and cash equivalents, the property, the plant and \nequipment, and the trade and other payables. I invite the hon. Members to consult the \nfinancial statements tabled so far, should they require additional information. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is a matter of great concern that the NTC has been \ncumulating deficits year on year since 2015 to reach a staggering sum of Rs1.2 to Rs3 billion \nin June 2024. I can list the breakdown but you will surely stop me, but let me just mention the \nlast three or four figures where they are the highest – \n• June 2021 – Rs199 million; \n• June 2022 – Rs150 million; \n• June 2023 – Rs184 million; \n• June 2024 – Rs209 million. \nAnd these are not audited figures; these are from management accounts; they could be more.  \nThese figures definitely speak for themselves on the state of the affairs of the \ncorporation which have been persistent over the last ten years due to various reasons \nincluding a poor management and a lack of appropriate strategies. \nIt is against this backdrop that the new board of the NTC, under the Chairmanship of \nNishad Baig held, I am informed, the very first strategic meeting on Saturday 19 April 2025 \nwith senior management people and board members of the NTC to strategically reflect on \ncost efficiency measures.  \nThank you.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: One more question! \nMs Anquetil : Je vous remercie. M. le président, devant une telle dérive financière, je \nne peux mais taire. Est-ce que le ministre pourrait indiquer à la Chambre quelle action \nconcrète son ministère prévoit-il face à ce déficit de R 1 milliards à la NTC, devenu \nclairement insoutenable ? Merci. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Basically, cost-cutting measures. I had to mention the figures \nof the last four years because it is during those four years specifically that fake spare parts \n\n77 \n \nwere bought at very high prices and were made to be passed for genuine spare parts and \ncosted hundreds and millions of rupees to the NTC.  \nSo, when you deal with fake spare parts, it means that you have to change again \nbecause the quality is not the same. So, cost-cutting measures and even for tyres –I had \nmentioned before – they were buying tyres that lasted only 4000 km. Can you imagine? \nSo, the FCC is currently enquiring on this. I hope light will be shed sometime soon so \nthat those responsible for this very sorrow state of affairs be made answerable to the people \nof this country. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River! \nPUBLIC SERVICE VEHICLE (TAXI) LICENCE – APPLICATION – \nCRITERIA & PROCEDURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/431",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 431,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/431) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Public Service Vehicle (Taxi) Licence \nwith hotels as base of operation issued over the past ten years, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information as to the number \nthereof, indicating – \n(a) \nthe procedures followed for the allocation thereof, and  \n(b)  if the applicants complied with the required criteria in terms of – \n (i) \ncharacter certificate test  \n(ii) \nage of applicant, and  \n(iii) number of taxis per hotel.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this information is being compiled by \nthe NLTA and I shall arrange for same to be placed in the Library of the National Assembly \nonce same is made available to my Ministry.  \nThank you.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \n \n \n\n78 \n \nCONSUMER PROTECTION – BASIC COMMODITIES – MAXIMUM RETAIL \nPRICE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/432",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 432,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/432) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to \nconsumer protection, he will state if consideration will be given for the imposition of a \nmaximum retail price on frequently consumed basic commodities and for same to be labelled \non the packaging thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Yeung Sik Yuen: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, at the level of my Ministry the prices of \nessential commodities on the market are continuously being monitored and analysed since \nimporters and local producers are practicing significantly higher prices than usual.  \nAs regards the imposition of a maximum retail price on frequently consumed \ncommodities for Mauritius and Rodrigues, a survey is ongoing on different types of canned \nfoods and other daily products. Based on the report that is expected shortly, I shall make a \nrecommendation on the proposed extension of maximum retail price and other consumed \ncommodities for consideration at the level of Cabinet, prior to promulgating further \nregulation under the Consumer Protection (Price and Supplies Control) Act 1998. A \ncommuniqué will thereafter be issued to the members of the public.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, according to Section 11 of the Legal Metrology Act on \nLabelling and Standardisation of pre-packed commodities – \n“(1) No person shall pre-pack or cause to be pre-packed any commodity unless the \npackage of the commodity bears a conspicuous label carrying a declaration in such \nmanner as may be prescribed as to – \n(a) \nthe name of the commodity;  \n(b) \nthe net quantity of the commodity; \n(c) \nthe name and complete address of the packer; and  \n(d) \nsuch other information as may be required.” \nIn addition, in line with the Consumer Protection (Pharmaceutical Products) (Maximum \nMark-Up) Regulations 2023, importers are required to affix the approved maximum retail \nprices on every pack, packet or container of pharmaceutical products. This concerns about \nmore than 7000 medicines which are subject to price control. \n\n79 \n \nAs regards for other commodities, in accordance with the Consumer Protection \n(Consumer Goods) (Maximum Mark-Up) Regulations 1998, a weighted average maximum \nprice is applied to new consignments and existing stocks. As such, the price of the controlled \ncommodities automatically changed once the price of the new consignment is approved in \norder to reflect the new prices.  \nPresently, consumers have access to transparent and necessary information on the \nnewly approved maximum price for each product which is on the website, the Price Fixing \nInformation System and that are to be practiced by retailers. Consumers can thus also report \nfor any mis-pricing to my Ministry for necessary actions.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Beechook! \nMr Beechook: Can the Minister come up with regulations so that the MRP, the \nMaximum Retail Price, be affixed, be visible to the consumers so that, at least, they do not \nhave to go on the website of the Ministry to crosscheck the MRP and the actual price that is \nbeing practiced in shops, supermarkets and so on?  \nAnd it is being practiced in India.  \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: We will try to consider! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you.  \nHon. Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien! \nNSLD LTD – 8000 HOUSING UNITS PROJECT – STRATEGIC PLAN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/433",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 433,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/433) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to social housing, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the New Social Living Development Ltd., information as to \nwhere matters stand as to the construction of the 8000 housing units, indicating the strategic \nplan of Government in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the New Social Living \nDevelopment Ltd (NSLD) that out of 8,000 housing units, 688 houses, including onsite and \noffsite infrastructure works have been completed over four sites, namely at Valetta, Olivia, \nGrand Bel Air and Mare d’Albert. As such, the percentage completion of the 8,000 housing \nunits project stands, as at date, at 8.6 %.  \nAccording to the NSLD, 6,642 additional housing units are expected to be completed \nover 31 sites by July 2026, which would bring the completion rate to 92 % by the end of the \n\n80 \n \nnext financial year. So, obviously, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the facts and figures are there for \nall to see. It is this Government that has to oversee the whole project of the 8,000 houses or \nso. \nThe remaining 670 housing units are expected to be completed before the end of 2027. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the completion of the 8,000 housing units project has been \nhampered due to delay in the implementation of offsite infrastructure works, clearly poor \nmanagement, such as water and electricity supply, construction of drains, again crazy poor \nmanagement, unimaginable and construction of appropriate sewage disposal systems. The \nsewage disposal part is even worse in terms of mismanagement. \nThe NSLD is holding regular follow-up meetings with the authorities concerned and \nhas taken over the implementation of immediate offsite drain works so that the housing units \nmay be delivered to the eligible beneficiaries without any further delay. \nMr Apollon: Thank you, hon. Minister. As we all know that all these social housing \nunits have been constructed without all amenities. Can the hon. Minister table the list of \ncontractors who have been appointed for the construction of these social housing units? \nMr Mohamed: I have no objection to do the needful. I do not have the required \ninformation at hand, but I undertake to table it as soon as possible. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Members, the Table has been advised that the following \nPQs have been withdrawn: B/435, B/442, B/445, B/452, B/455 and B/457. \nNext question, hon. Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d'Or! \nMAURITIUS  EEZ – BILATERAL FISHERIES AGREEMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/434",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 434,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/434) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the Exclusive Economic Zone of Mauritius, he will state – \n(a) \nthe number of bilateral fisheries partnership agreements currently in force, \nindicating the – \n(i) \ncountries concerned therewith, and \n(ii) \nconditions attached thereto, and \n(b) \nwhere matters stand as to the fish stocks taking thereat.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, hon. Member. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, currently, \nthere are only two bilateral fisheries partnership agreements in force. These are related to tuna \nfisheries, namely a Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement with the European Union.  \n\n81 \n \nThe agreement was signed between the European Union and Mauritius on 21 December \n2013 and entered into force on 28 January 2014 for a period of six years. It is tacitly \nrenewable for an additional period of three years. Now, the countries concerned with this \nagreement are European Member States. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard part (a) (ii) of the question, in respect of the \nconditions attached thereto, I have been informed that the agreement provides for condition to \nensure sustainable exploitation of tuna resources in the waters of Mauritius. They are, namely \n– \n(a) \nobligations of EU vessels to comply with laws of Mauritius and to be included \nin the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission’s record of authorised vessels, and not on \nthe Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated List of IOTC or any other regional \nfisheries management organisation; \n(b) \nreporting of catch through submission of paper and electronic log books; \n(c) \nnotifying the ministry on landing and transshipment activities of the vessels; \n(d) \nnotification on entry and exit of EU vessels from Mauritius waters; \n(e) \ninspection and control of EU vessels by Mauritian inspectors; \n(f) \nregular reporting of fishing position through satellite-based vessel monitoring \nsystem; \n(g) \nembarkation of observers to collect data on the fishing activities of EU vessels, \nand \n(h) \nembarkation of local qualified seamen onboard EU vessels. \nNow, the second agreement is a Fishing Agreement with the Federation of Japan \nFisheries Corporative Association. This agreement was signed in 2007 and provides for the \nlicensing of 50 Japanese longliners annually for longline tuna fishing in Mauritian waters. \nThe agreement was first reviewed in 2009 and is automatically renewed for a further period \nof two years.  \nHowever, the last licenses issued in respect of Japanese vessel were in 2019 and no new \nlicenses have been issued. The catch data from the Japanese vessel is also nil since the \nsignature in 2007. In this respect, I intend to impress upon the Ambassador Extraordinary and \nPlenipotentiary of Japan to re-boost the agreement so that more Japanese vessels can fish in \nour waters. The conditions under the agreement are the same in relation to the agreement \nwhich we have with the European Union.  \n\n82 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House \nthat tunas are migratory fish and exhibit significant migratory patterns driven by factors like \nfeeding, spawning and seasonal current, and travel extensively among EEZ found in the \nIndian Ocean. \nThe Indian Ocean Tuna Commission is the regional fisheries management organisation \nresponsible for sustainable management of the tuna and tuna-like species in the Indian Ocean. \nIt is also responsible for the stock assessment of the tuna species which are carried out on a \nregular basis. Mauritius is party to the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission and adheres to all the \nconservation and management measures put forth by the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission. \nOther than tuna, Mauritius also has the bank fisheries in which demersal species are \ncaught by semi-industrial fishing vessels that bring chilled and frozen fish to the Mauritian \npopulation. It is a well-established fishery stock, and it is monitored regularly by the Albion \nFisheries Research Centre. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Etwareea! \nMr Etwareea: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, can we have some details on the financial \naspect of the agreements to the EU and Japan? \nDr. Boolell: No, I do not have the information. But I can retrieve the information and \nsubmit it accordingly. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nMTA – PLEASURE CRAFT LICENCES (2015-2024)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/435",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 435,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. B/435) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Tourism whether, in regard to commercial pleasure craft licences, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Tourism Authority, information as to the \nnumber thereof issued over the period 2015 to 2024.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIUS OLYMPIC COMMITTEE – POTENTIAL IOC SUSPENSION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/436",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 436,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/436) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the ongoing conflict between the \nMauritius Olympic Committee and the Mauritius Tennis Federation, he will state if he has \nbeen made aware of a letter dated 16 April 2025 from the International Olympic Committee \n\n83 \n \nregarding the potential suspension of the Mauritius Olympic Committee and, if so, indicate \nthe actions being envisaged thereon and that no sanction is taken against Mauritius at \ninternational level.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that on 24 April \n2025, the Mauritius Olympic Committee has forwarded to me a copy of a letter dated 16 \nApril 2025 from the International Olympic Committee that was addressed to the President \nand Members of the Executive Committee of the Mauritius Olympic Committee. \nIn the said letter, the International Olympic Committee, inter alia, raised concerns \nabout the situation prevailing at the Mauritius Olympic Committee and pressed upon the \nlatter to take all necessary measures to ensure the holding of the elective general assembly at \nthe earliest opportunity. Failing which, the International Olympic Committee may take \nprotective measures in line with rule 27 (9) of the Olympic Charter which includes \nsuspension of or withdrawal of recognition from a National Olympic Committee. In this case, \nthe Mauritius Olympic Committee. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that the elective general assembly of the \nMauritius Olympic Committee was scheduled on 25 January 2025. However, on 23 January \n2025, upon an application by the Mauritius Tennis Federation, the Sport Arbitration Tribunal \nordered that an interim order in the nature of an injunction be issued, restraining and \nprohibiting the Mauritius Olympic Committee from holding or proceeding with its \nforthcoming elective general assembly, pending the hearing and determination of the present \nmatter. \nWhile the case was still ongoing before the Sport Arbitration Tribunal, the Mauritius \nOlympic Committee scheduled another elective general assembly for 29 March 2025. On 20 \nMarch 2025, following application by the Mauritius Tennis Federation for an ex parte interim \norder, the Sport Arbitration Tribunal declined to issue the order as the latter understood and \nrecognised that parities are to maintain the status quo pending the hearing and determination \nof the main case. Thus, the application was set aside.  \nI am informed that in face of this new development, the Mauritius Tennis Federation \napplied for an injunction before the Supreme Court and that same was granted. An \napplication by the Mauritius Olympic Committee to discharge the injunction was set aside. I \nam further informed that the Mauritius Olympic Committee has appealed against this \ndecision and the case is ongoing before the Supreme Court. \n\n84 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, notwithstanding the aforesaid mentioned, I had already written \nto the International Olympic Committee as far back as 21 March 2025 to draw their attention \nto governance issues that were prevailing at the Olympic Committee.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, further to the International Olympic Committee’s letter dated \n16 April 2025, I have addressed another letter to the said committee informing them that the \npresent situation is due to internal conflicts among the members of the Mauritius Olympic \nCommittee, and not due to some form of Government interference. \nI expressly made reference to the fact that under our legislation, National Sports \nFederations are autonomous bodies that are free to operate within our Republic so long as \nthey have a legal status and comply with the Olympic Charter. I also stated this \nGovernment’s firm commitment to collaborate with the International Olympic Committee to \nensure free and fair elections at the level of the Mauritius Olympic Committee. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member! \nMr Quirin: M. le président, avec votre permission, par rapport au contexte actuel, le \nministre peut-il nous dire comment il compte éviter au pays suspension alors que le CIO dans \nle passé n’a pas hésité à suspendre de grandes nations comme l’Inde et la Russie ? Ça, c’est \nma première question, M. le président. \nMr Nagalingum:  Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this is a speculative question. We shall \ncross that bridge when we come to it. As far as we are concerned, we are proceeding \naccording to our legal framework. As I have stated in my reply, the matter is sub judice and \nwe have to respect our court of law. \nMr Quirin: M. le président, l’honorable ministre ne pense-t-il pas que c’est de son \ndevoir de réunir le COM, la Fédération mauricienne de tennis, le représentant du Comité \nolympique international, s’asseoir avec l’honorable ministre lui-même et ces officiers, pour \ntrouver une solution à ce problème ? Parce que ce que nous risquons, M. le président, de voir \nnos athlètes être pénalisés. C’est cela mon souci. Je connais très bien comment ça se passe, je \nne suis pas là pour dire qui a raison, qui a tort. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question, hon. Member! \nMr Quirin: Ma question est justement de demander au ministre, de réunir tout ce beau \nmonde, de s’asseoir et faire de son mieux pour qu’on puisse arriver à une solution évitant \nainsi que le pays, c’est le pays sera suspendu et les athlètes mauriciens avec. \n\n85 \n \nAn hon. Member : À cause de qui ? \n(Interruptions) \nMr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am really surprised because at this stage, \nlike I mentioned, it is not appropriate at all to meet with parties as there is an ongoing court \ncase, so how can we meet with these people.  \n(Interruptions) \nYou, yourself in the past, you mentioned that… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Address the Chair! \nMr Nagalingum: You mentioned that, you criticised that! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Address the Chair! \nMr Nagalingum: And today you are telling me to meet with people who are using \ndirty money. Up to you but not me! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question? You will go to your next question? \nMr Quirin: Une dernière question ! Sorry? \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question B/437. We are going to your next question.  \nMr Quirin: No, I have one last question for… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, I allow you a last one. \nMr Quirin: M. le président, je connais très bien la situation et je sais très bien \ncomment cela se passe, je ne suis pas en train de défendre ceux qui sont en train de finir le \nsport à Maurice au contraire. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Your question, please. Put your question! \nMr Quirin: Ma question est, si certains n’ont pas compris ma position, et ma position \nelle n’a jamais changé même quand j’étais dans l’opposition avec mon Parti et aujourd’hui, je \nsuis un indépendant, ma position reste la même. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Your question, please! \nMr Quirin: Il faut mettre de l’ordre dans le sport, je suis d’accord mais je demande à \nce que les athlètes ne soient pas pénalisés, il faut trouver une solution, je ne suis pas là pour \ndire qui a raison, qui a tort, je laisse le choix à l’honorable ministre… \n\n86 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: This is your last question. \nMr Quirin: C’est lui le ministre, c’est à lui de prendre des bonnes décisions, je \nreconnais mais je me demande… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you have a question or you do not have a question? \nMr Quirin: Ma question est, est-ce que l’île Maurice doit s’attendre à ce que dans les \njours à venir, est-ce que le mouvement sportif peut s’attendre dans les jours à venir à ce \nqu’une solution soit trouvée afin que le sport mauricien ne soit pas pénalisé, suspendu par le \nCIO ? C’est cela mon souci. \nMr Nagalingum: I am going to repeat myself, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the thing is that \nthe situation is before the court of justice. We have to wait, there is nothing more we can do. \nThe Deputy Speaker: You have already answered. Okay! Next question. \nMr Quirin: If you want to wait, you wait. I am doing my job! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question. B/437. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite \nRivière. \nSOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS – SALE OF GOODS & ARTICLES – REGULATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/437",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 437,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/437) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the sale of goods and \narticles on social media platforms in Mauritius, he will state the measures taken for the \nregulation thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Yeung Sik Yuen: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with the increasing prevalence of social \nmedia platforms such as Facebook, Instagram and TikTok being used for commercial \ntransactions, my Ministry has noted a significant rise in complaints concerning misleading \nadvertisements, unfair trading practices and a lack of transparency in dealings with online \nsellers. In response to these concerns, the Fair-Trading Act has been amended to empower \nmy Ministry to formulate specific regulations governing electronic commerce including \nactivities conducted via social media platforms. \nAccordingly, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry has initiated the drafting of the E-\ncommerce Regulations 2025 which aim to introduce a robust legal framework for regulating \nthe sales of goods and services over digital platforms. These regulations will cover all forms \nof online trading in Mauritius including those conducted through social media. \n\n87 \n \nFormal consultations on the draft regulations commence on 12 February 2025 with key \npublic sector stakeholders. These were followed by a second round of consultations on 10 \nApril 2025 with representatives from the business and consumer sectors including with \nMauritius Chamber of Commerce and Industry (MCCI), the General Retailers Association \n(GRA) and the Association des Consommateurs de l’île Maurice (ACIM). These stakeholders \nwere invited to review and submit proposals on the preliminary draft. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, these regulations will apply to all e-commerce activities within \nthe Republic of Mauritius and are intended to protect consumers while ensuring that all \ntraders including those operating on social media adhere to fair and transparent practices. \nMr Quirin: M. le président, avec votre permission, concernant les produits contrefaits \nqui sont vendus en ligne, l’honorable ministre peut-il nous dire quelles sont les mesures qu’il \ncompte apporter afin de protéger les consommateurs ? \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Well, we will definitely look into it. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Members, the Table has been advised that the \nfollowing PQs have been withdrawn: B/439, B/446, B/449, B/450, B/453, B/456, B/458, \nB/459 and B/460. \nNow, the Second Member for Grand’Baie and Poudre d’Or. \nGOVERNMENT SCHOOLS AMENITIES – PUBLIC ACCESS – \nEXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/438",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 438,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/438) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to Government schools, \nhe will state if consideration will be given to allowing public access to the amenities thereof \nafter school hours for extracurricular activities.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to thank the hon.  Member for this \nPQ which will allow me to expand on the new philosophy of this Government regarding \namenities of government schools.  \nIn fact, I am informed that some of the amenities of government schools were already \naccessible to the public prior to my coming into office. However, given that there are \nnumerous requests from registered organisations to benefit from government school \namenities, my Ministry has decided to provide more access to the following amenities – \n1. \ngymnasium for badminton; \n\n88 \n \n2. \nfootball grounds, volleyballs and basketball pitches, and \n3. \nclassrooms to conduct workshops on human values, anti-bullying \ncampaigns and training by registered agencies to empower our senior \ncitizens and women’s organisations. \nIt has been reported that there are no appropriate amenities in many localities for the \npublic to practice activities such as karate, yoga and Zumba among others. With a view to \nproviding such leisure activities in different localities as a primordial antidote for drug and \nsubstance abuse, the public will be given access to the above activities in more government \nschools in light of emerging needs and requirements. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as per the existing procedures, registered groups or \norganisations have to submit their applications to the Heads of School or to the Zone \nDirectorates. Same are approved by the Zone Directors upon the recommendation of the \nHead of School for a period valid up to four months, subject to availability of slots. There is a \npayment of a nominal fee of Rs100 per hour for badminton courts and Rs200 per hour for \nwhole gymnasium and football ground. The nominal fees are used to cover the cost of \nmaintenance and security service for the amenities. \nWith a view to maximising safe and secure access to Government for school amenities \nfor extracurricular activities after school hours, the current procedures will be streamlined \nand the fees to be charged will be reconsidered. The amenities of schools will be granted to \nregistered organisations in the locality and its surrounding areas. A survey across all schools \nhaving such amenities will be conducted and same will be put at the disposal of the public. \nHowever, this will entail a responsible use of these amenities. Those who will be using the \nschool premises will have to adhere to strict discipline, rules and regulations which will be set \nby the Heads of School and Zonal Directors. In no way, should our staff or students be \npenalised or disturbed by this measure. \nI wish also to reassure Educators and Head of Schools that opening the premises of \nGovernment schools after school hours for extracurricular activities will not entail any \nadditional hours of work for them. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Time is over!  \nThe Table has been advised that PQ B/441 has been withdrawn. \n \n\n89 \n \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I beg to move that all the business on \ntoday’s Order Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10.  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded.  \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nPUBLIC BILLS \nFirst Reading \n On motion made and seconded, the following Bills were read a first time –  \n(a) \nThe Constitution (Amendment) Bill (No. X of 2025) \n \n \n(b) \nThe Criminal Code (Amendment) Bill (No. XI of 2025) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Members, Madam Speaker will take the Chair. \nAt this stage, Madam Speaker took the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: You may be seated! \nSecond Reading \nTHE PUBLIC INQUIRIES BILL  \n(NO. V OF 2025) \nOrder for Second Reading read. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister! \n(4.21 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Housing and Lands (Mr S. Mohamed): Madam Speaker, I move that \nthe Public Inquiries Bill (No. V of 2025) be read a second time and I stand as Ag. Attorney \nGeneral in this matter. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nMr Mohamed: Madam Speaker, the Public Inquiries Bill is not a routine update or a \ncosmetic change of name – the same old product in a new packaging. This is a reform of our \nwhole approach to administrative inquiries, a reform whose time has come and whose \n\n90 \n \nnecessity is both practical and historical; for this Bill is about how the State confronts the \ntruth, how it learns from experience and how it responds when something has gone wrong or \nis feared to have gone wrong. \nAs hon. Members are aware, the Government Programme 2025-2029 has pledged to \nreplace the Commissions of Inquiry Act of 1944 with a legislation that is modern, transparent \nand fit for purpose. Indeed, Madam Speaker, the Act it replaces is over 80 years old. It was \nshaped in a colonial era, when the Governor General – not Parliament – determined how and \nwhy inquiries would be held. It contains no procedural safeguards, no timelines, no \nrecognition of rights and no clarity as to the legal status of findings. Over time, it has become \na blunt tool, sometimes used well, sometimes not. In a modern democracy, we need more \ncoherent standards, less confusion. We need a sharper instrument, one capable of balancing \ntruth finding with fairness and legitimacy. This is why we are now replacing a bludgeon with \na scalpel.  \nThe flaws of the old law are well documented. Commissions of Inquiry have too often \nlacked credibility, not necessarily because the idea of truth finding was wrong but because the \nprocess failed. Our Courts have thus intervened repeatedly. In the case of Ramgoolam v \nMatadeen 2001, the Supreme Court criticised the Commission for making serious allegations \nagainst the sitting Prime Minister without giving him a chance to respond. In Valayden v \nMatadeen 2002, it found that individuals were denied the right to rebut damaging evidence \nheard in their absence. There have been many such examples over the years.  \nIn fact, it is now expected that after the publication of every report by a Commission of \nInquiry, there will be applications for judicial review, where people affected by damaging \ncomments would go to the Court to seek justice. They would say ‘my rights were violated; \nmy reputation has been damaged. I was not given the chance to rebut allegations against me. I \nwas not treated fairly.’ And regularly, the Supreme Court has vindicated them. In 2022, even \nthe Privy Council found in the case of Pyaneandee v Lam Shang Leen that – \n“The procedure adopted by the Commission in relation to the appellant did not accord \nwith the principles of fairness and natural justice.” \nThe Courts have been clear. Natural justice is not optional. Fairness is not negotiable. \nWhere rights and reputations are at stake, due process is a must. An inquiry’s legitimacy \ndepends not just on what it says it has uncovered but how it went about to uncover it. This is \nnot merely a philosophical point. It has practical implications.  \n\n91 \n \nThe Institute for Government in the UK has shown that public trust in the inquiry \nprocess is tightly linked to transparency, timeliness and clarity of purpose. In their study of \nUK public inquiries, they note that delays, vague mandates and political interference have all \nundermined effectiveness. Similarly, in Australia, the Institute of Public Administration \nreported that inquiries fail when they become vehicles for blame rather than instruments of \ninstitutional learning.  \nNew Zealand’s Law Commission also warned of the dangers of inquiry structures that \nlack coherence. In its 2008 review, it noted there was no consistent approach in the \nestablishment, management or conduct of inquiries at the time. \nIn its 2008 review, it noted there was no consistent approach in the establishment, \nmanagement or conduct of enquiries at the time. It recommended greater codification, better \nrights protections and clearer rules of procedure, many of which mirror the features of the \nBill now before this House.  \nDr. Scott Prasser, a leading academic in the field, has written extensively on the need to \navoid “inquiry inflation” – where ad hoc inquiries proliferate without consistency, leading to \npublic fatigue and institutional confusion. He stresses that inquiries should be exceptional \nevents, not routine political reflexes. This Bill embodies that ethos by placing structure and \nprocedure where there was once opacity and confusion. \nMadam Speaker, at the core of this Bill lies three essential objectives to enhance \ntransparency, ensure procedural fairness and strengthen the legal foundations of public \ninquiries in Mauritius. \nFirst, the Bill enhances transparency and accountability. By mandating that inquiries be \nheld in public – unless justified exceptions apply – and by requiring that final reports be \npublished and tabled in the National Assembly, it ensures that the public is kept informed of \nmatters of significant national concern. This will foster trust in the process and confidence in \nthe institutions involved. \nSecond, the Bill safeguards procedural fairness. It provides a structured, rights-\nrespecting framework for how inquiries are to be conducted. Individuals whose rights or \nreputations may be affected are explicitly granted the right to be heard, to present their \nversion of events and to respond to allegations. \n\n92 \n \nThird, the Bill consolidates and clarifies the legal framework governing inquiries. It \ncodifies the powers, responsibilities and limitations of the Board of Inquiry. This removes \nambiguity, reduces the risk of politicization or procedural error and provides a clear roadmap \nfor all actors involved – from the appointing authority to those summon to appear. In so \ndoing, it modernises our public law architecture in a way that is aligned with modern \ndemocracies. \nMadam Speaker, let me now turn to the main features of the Bill, which are designed to \nachieve these objectives. Under clause 3, the Prime Minister may establish a Board of Inquiry \nwhere he considers that a particular event has caused, or may cause, public concern – or that \nthere is significant public concern that such an event has occurred. This ensures inquiries are \ninitiated where there is a genuine need for institutional scrutiny, grounded in the public \ninterest.  \nThis approach is consistent with international models. In the United Kingdom, inquiries \nunder the Inquiries Act of 2005 are set up by a Minister of the Crown. In Australia, similar \ndiscretion is vested in the Executive. The principle is the same: inquiries are initiated by \nelected leaders, who are accountable to Parliament and to the electorate for their decisions. \nWhat matters is not just the identity of the initiator, but the framework of transparency and \noversight that surrounds that prerogative.  \nIn our case, this is addressed through Clause 6, which requires the Prime Minister to \nnotify the National Assembly once a Board has been or will be set up. Clause 21 provides \nthat the Board of Inquiry must submit its report to the Prime Minister upon completion of its \nwork. Clause 22 then mandates that the report be tabled before the National Assembly and \npublished within 30 days. This avoids the common problem of reports being shelved or \nselectively disclosed, and reinforces the duty of accountability to Parliament. The imposition \nof a deadline to submit a report, in Clause 5, will be an important break from the past. No \nlonger will reports be left dans les tiroirs de qui que ce soit.  \nClause 4 requires that every Board of Inquiry operates under clear, defined terms of \nreference. These will set out the subject matter, scope and timeline for the enquiry. To further \nstrengthen independence and clarity, Clause 8 provides that the Prime Minister must consult \nthe appointed Chairperson before finalising the terms of reference. This consultation ensures \n\n93 \n \nthat the person responsible for managing the inquiry has the opportunity to shape its mandate \n– and is not merely handed a political script that he must follow.  \nSubject to exceptions for confidentiality or public interest, proceedings are to be held in \npublic. Members of the public, including the press, may access the proceedings and view the \nrecord of evidence. This not only builds legitimacy, but also guards against selective leaks, \nsecrecy and political misrepresentation. \nAs we have seen, a central weakness of the 1944 Act was its silence on individual \nrights. Clause 18 corrects this. Any person who reasonably believes that their reputation may \nbe adversely affected by the inquiry is entitled to be heard and to give evidence in rebuttal. \nMadam Speaker, this codification of natural justice is one of the most critical features of this \nBill. It mirrors the so-called ‘Maxwellisation’ process in UK law and directly addresses the \nrecurring procedural failings that led to so many court decisions. \nClause 5 draws an important line. A Board of Inquiry may not make a binding \ndetermination on civil or criminal liability, it is not a court of law. It does not pronounce guilt \nnor impose sanction. However, Clause 5 (2) rightly clarifies that the Board may still draw \ninferences based on the evidence it has gathered and may make recommendations. That is the \nnature of any investigative process: to form a view on the facts. This is no different from the \nposition under the UK Inquiries Act of 2005, where inquiries are similarly prohibited from \nmaking formal legal findings, but may report on facts that point to misconduct or \nwrongdoing.  \nThis balance is essential, Madam Speaker. It protects individuals from judgment \nwithout trial, while allowing the State to learn, to recommend, and where necessary, to refer \nmatters to the proper legal or disciplinary authorities.  \nThe Bill preserves the right of judicial review. As per Clause 30, anyone aggrieved by \nthe findings of an inquiry may seek redress through the courts within 21 days. This ensures \nthat inquiry powers are subject to legal limits, and that those affected have a clear procedural \nremedy where those limits are breached. \nMadam Speaker, let me be clear, Clause 32 (2) provides that all pending commissions \nunder the old law shall lapse. This will apply to the Commission of Inquiry on the \naffreightment of Betamax. The Betamax case has been the subject of a long and expensive \n\n94 \n \nlitigation saga. An international arbitration tribunal, the Supreme Court, the Judicial \nCommittee of the Privy Council have all examined the matter. And ultimately, the Privy \nCouncil found clearly that there was nothing improper about the contract. You cannot be \nclearer than that! \nDespite this, the previous government saw fit to establish a commission of inquiry into \nthe very same matter, targeting, in particular, the current Prime Minister. If you want to know \nwhat is politically motivated, learn from the other side! That commission serves no real \npurpose. It has no legal justification. Its political agenda was clear for all to see. It was simply \nan exercise in retroactive blame. It cannot be allowed to carry on and to further waste public \nmoney. \nMadam Speaker, this Bill is not about shielding anyone from scrutiny. It is about \nensuring that scrutiny is meaningful, lawful and fair. It puts an end to a model that has too \noften confused inquiry with prosecution or even persecution, and replaces it with a \nframework built on clarity, accountability and justice. In doing so, we uphold the values of \ndue process institutional integrity and the rule of law. \nI, therefore, commend the Bill to the House. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister! \nYes, hon. Leader of the Opposition, the floor is yours! \n(4.37 p.m.) \nThe Leader of the Opposition (Mr G. Lesjongard): Thank you, Madam Speaker for \ngiving me the floor to intervene on this piece of legislation. \nMadam Speaker, timing and context are always important factors to be considered \nwhenever a piece of legislation is proposed in the National Assembly. Concerning this piece \nof legislation, Madam Speaker, I believe it is my duty as Leader of the Opposition to voice \nout my concerns. We have a fundamental issue with the presentation of this Bill and my first \nremark is very pertinent. As compared to the Commission of Inquiry Act of 1944, in this \n\n95 \n \npresent Bill the Prime Minister is being given wide powers et une liberté sans limite par \nrapport à cette nouvelle législation. \nMadam Speaker, powers which this National Assembly had given to the President of \nthe Republic since we have become a Republic, today, unfortunately, these powers are being \ntaken away from the President in this Public Inquiries Bill.  I refer to two specific sections: \nfirst, section 2 of the Commission of Inquiry Act on “Appointment of Commissions of \nInquiry”, and I also refer to section 3 of the Commission of Inquiry Act entitled “Powers of \nthe President” and I refer particularly to section 3(4) which says and I quote – \n“Any Commission may be altered or revoked by the President with the advice and \nconsent of the Assembly, or by the President, as the case may be.” \nMadam Speaker, under clause 6 of this Bill, the Prime Minister has a duty to inform the \nNational Assembly only, this time, when setting up the Commission of Inquiry. This Bill does \nnot impose any duty on the Prime Minister to seek the advice and consent of this august \nAssembly. \nMadame la présidente, c’est un recul pour la transparence et le devoir envers cet \nauguste Assemblée. Et cet après-midi, Madame la présidente, nous allons voter une loi – et je \npense que cela est une première – pour enlever les pouvoirs au président en ce qui concerne \nla mise sur pied d’une commission d’enquête et nous savons tous, Madame la présidente, \nqu’éventuellement après avoir voté cette législation, c’est le président qui aura a donné son \nassentiment à cette loi.  \nI wish to refer the House, Madam Speaker, to section 65 of our Constitution where it is \nstated and I quote – \n“The Prime Minister shall keep the President fully informed concerning the general \nconduct of the government of Mauritius and shall furnish the President with such \ninformation as he may request with respect to any particular matter relating to the \ngovernment of Mauritius.” \nÀ ce stade, Madame la présidente, je voudrais savoir si le président de la république a \nété consulté et s’il a donné son accord. Car au cas contraire nous pourrions nous retrouver \nface à un refus du président de la république de donner son assentiment à ce projet de loi et \nnous retrouver comme en février 2002 face à une crise constitutionnelle au plus haut sommet \nde l’État. \n\n96 \n \nMy second remark on this Bill, Madam Speaker, refers to the mode of setting up the \nBoard of Inquiry. Again, one would expect that the President of the Republic, given his duty \nin the Constitution as the Head of State, that is, to uphold and defend the Constitution and to \nensure that the Constitution, democracy and rule of law are respected, the President of the \nRepublic would be the proper person to establish such a Board of Inquiry but it is not so any \nmore in the piece of legislation we are debating today.  \nInstead, Madam Speaker, it is only where the Prime Minister is of opinion that in the \npublic interest or public welfare, that he would set up the Board of Inquiry. The President of \nthe Republic as the Head of State does not have his say anymore. He is only called upon \nunder clause 8(4) of the Bill to preside only the swearing ceremony of the members of the \nBoard of Inquiry appointed by the Prime Minister. \nMadame la présidente, selon moi, le rôle du président de la république dans notre \ndémocratie est en train d’être bafoué avec ce projet de loi et je pense, comme je l’ai dit, que \nc’est la première fois que les pouvoirs du président sont enlevés. \nNow, Madam Speaker, notwithstanding the preamble of this Bill, one should ask this \nquestion – what is the true objective of this Bill? And I hope, Madam Speaker, that it is not a \npolitical strategy against political opponents to the regime in the name of public concern or \npublic interest. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker, you will agree that the role of the National Assembly is also \ninsignificant now in this piece of legislation. One would expect that there might be a Board of \nInquiry in the democratic society where Parliament is involved. However, from now on, the \nPrime Minister will decide of the setting up of a Board of Inquiry as per clause 3 of the Bill \nand with your permission, Madam Speaker, I would like to quote this specific clause 3, that is \n“Setting up of Board of Inquiry” and I quote – \n“Where the Prime Minister is of the opinion that – \n(a)  a particular event has caused, or is capable of causing, public concern; or \n(b)  there is public concern that a particular event may have occurred (…)” \nAnd as far as clause 3(a) is concerned, on the wording of “a particular event has caused”, my \nquestion to the Prime Minister is: is there any prescription as to time? How far back in time \n\n97 \n \ncan we go with this legislation, Madam Speaker? And here, I wish to know, is the Prime \nMinister, for example, of the opinion that the phone tapping scandal should be subjected to a \npublic inquiry, and secondly, on the wording of “is capable of causing”, is that a wholly \nsubjective test as to the Prime Minister’s belief? Are we made to understand that the setting \nup of a Board of Inquiry rests upon the Prime Minister’s capacity of pre-empting the future \nimpacts of a particular event. The same queries, Madam Speaker, applies to clause 3(b) \nconcerning the wording that “a particular event may have occurred”. So, are we made to \nunderstand that it may not have occurred but the setting up of a Board of Inquiry will still be \njustified? \nMadam Speaker, clearly here, the Prime Minister is being given extensive powers to set \nup boards of enquiries at will and therefore, through this legislation, will be the sole master \nwith real time follow up first, of all proceedings and this is reflected in many Clauses.   \nNow, Madam Speaker, allow me to quote Clause 7(2) which relates to suspension of an \nenquiry, I quote – \n“The Prime Minister shall, not later than 7 days after the completion of any \ninvestigation or determination of any civil or criminal proceedings under subsection \n(1)(a) or (b), as the case may be, order the Board of Inquiry to proceed with its \ninquiry.” \nWith due respect, Madam Speaker, to our Constitution, we all know that civil or criminal \nproceedings take years to be fully determined and so, during such time, the Board of Inquiry \nwould be suspended or in limbo if I may say. \nMadam Speaker, what if those civil or criminal proceedings, when finally determined, \nare unsuccessful and the targeted person or persons win the day? Should, in that case, the \nlegislator not then impose upon the Prime Minister, the fate of that Board of Inquiry? Maybe, \nMadam Speaker, in similar lines to what Clause 4 that is, ‘Terms of reference of Board of \nInquiry’ provides. \nMadam Speaker, also according to Clause 7 of the Bill, the two reasons provided under \nthat Clause for suspension, I believe, are not sufficient. They are restrictive and the request of \nthe Board for suspension should be broaden to include any valid reason put forward by the \nBoard to request a suspension.  \nAt Section 4 (2), that is ‘Terms of reference of Board of Inquiry’, it is stated – \n\n98 \n \n“The Prime Minister may, at any time, amend the terms of reference of a Board of \nInquiry in the public interest or for the public welfare.” \nJe me pose la question, Madame la présidente, est-ce que cette section spécifique ne rend-t-\nelle pas légal l’interférence politique dans le déroulement des travaux d’une commission \nd’enquête ? \nMadame la présidente, la séparation des pouvoirs est un principe sacro-saint au sein de \nnotre république et notre système judiciaire a toujours été respecté mais cette section du \nprojet de loi nous interpelle. Un Premier ministre va pouvoir interférer dans les travaux \nprésidés par un sitting judge ou un ancien juge. \nMadame présidente, la section 4 (3) fait référence aux consultations entre le président \nde la Commission et le Premier ministre avant tout changement aux termes de référence. And \nI quote Section 4 (3) – \n“The Prime Minister shall, before setting up or amending the terms of reference of a \nBoard of Inquiry, consult the person he proposes to appoint, or has appointed, as \nChairperson.” \nUne question se pose. Que va faire le Premier ministre si le président de la commission \nrejette cette demande de changement ? Va-t-on, à ce moment-là, révoquer le président de \ncette Commission ? Alors, si c’est les cas, dans un tel cas, est-ce qu’on verra un ancien juge \nou un sitting judge être révoqué par un Premier ministre ? \nAt Clause 32, Madam Speaker, the Bill provides that previous Commissions of Inquiry \nwhich is pending on the commencement of this Act should lapse but curiously enough, at \nClause 3(3), it is envisaged that – \n “No Board of Inquiry shall be discontinued by reason of, or otherwise affected by, the \nPrime Minister’s absence or by him ceasing to hold office whether as a result of his \ndeath or for any other reason.” \nThis is a blatant contradiction of the rationale behind the idea of maintaining the board of \nenquiries set up by precedent government as contemplated, Madam Speaker, in Clause 3(3) \nof the Bill.  \nMadam Speaker, another issue which I want to bring to the attention of this House. We \nare in Mauritius. In Clause 8 (2) (b) which pertains to the composition of the Board of \nInquiry, how close is close in the sentence “a close association with an interested party”? \n\n99 \n \nMaybe we should determine the definition of close firstly. The Sub-Part (b) of the Bill on \nEvidence and Procedure is quite elaborate.  \nHowever, notwithstanding the restrictions in Clause 14 under Clause 13 (1), it would \nbe mandatory for the Chairperson shall take all reasonable steps as may be necessary to \nensure that members of the public are able to – \n“(b) obtain or view a record of evidence given, and documents produced or provided, \nduring such proceedings.” \nWhilst this is expressly stated, I presumed, Madam Speaker, that anyone being called by the \nBoard of Inquiry will have the same entitlement that is, “to obtain or view a record of \nevidence given and documents produced or provided during such proceedings”. \nNow if this is the case, Madam Speaker, why not expressly say so in the Bill? Madam \nSpeaker, let me refer to Clause 28(2) of the Bill and I believe our International Financial \nCentre is potentially as risk with this Clause. The hon. Attorney General is making a use of \nthe doctrine of implied repeal in Clause 28 (2) of the Bill. \nLaws, Madam Speaker, such as the Banking Act and more specifically, banking \nsecrecy, provided for example, in Section 64 of the Banking Act, which are being impliedly \nrepealed – why not in full transparency? Tell this august Assembly which laws are being \nexpected to be accepted in Clause 28(b)? Why not have a specific Clause in this Bill on \nconsequential amendments as has been the cursus in this National Assembly? \nMadam Speaker, I sound this note of caution because our International Financial Centre \nis potentially at risk and I asked a question – has the Bank of Mauritius, the Financial \nServices Commission and the Mauritius Bankers Association been consulted? \nMadame la présidente, je vais conclure. Le gouvernement apporte des gros \nchangements par rapport à une des Commissions les plus indépendantes de notre pays, une \ncomplète révision du système et qui touche directement la présidence de la république et \ndonne les pouvoirs au Premier ministre. \nJ’ai fait des recherches et je n’ai pas vu d’autres lois passées dans cette auguste \nAssemblée après que Maurice est devenu une République et qui enlèvent les pouvoirs ou \nprérogatives données au président de notre République. Le peuple mauricien doit prendre \nbonne note de cet affaiblissement des pouvoirs du président. L’avenir nous dira si la nouvelle \ncommission sera un outil politique ou une institution indépendante.  \n\n100 \n \nMadame la présidente, j’en ai terminé. \nMadam Speaker: Je vous remercie. I think we could break for tea if you agree. \nAt 4.57 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.37 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated!  \nHon. Minister of Labour, Mr Uteem!  \n(5.38 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations (Mr R. Uteem): Madam Speaker, \nallow me first of all to congratulate the Attorney-General for bringing this piece of \nlegislation, and to wish him a prompt recovery. I thank hon. Shakeel Mohamed for having \ndone his Second Reading and explaining the object of this Bill and how it is going to improve \nthe current legislation. \nBefore I deal with my speech properly, I would like to start by clearing a \nmisunderstanding. The hon. Leader of the Opposition spent most of his speech criticising the \nBill on the basis that apparently, we are taking away the power of the President. I do not \nblame him for that because he is not a lawyer. If he was a lawyer, he would have known that \nSection 64 (1) of the Constitution clearly provides, and I read, Madam Speaker, – \n“64 \nExercise of President’s functions \n(1)  \nIn the exercise of his functions under this Constitution or any other law, the \nPresident shall act in accordance with the advice of the Cabinet or of a Minister acting under \nthe general authority of the Cabinet except in cases where he is required by this Constitution \nto act in accordance with the advice of, or after consultation with, any person or authority \nother than the Cabinet or in his own deliberate judgment.” \nSection 64(1) of the Constitution lays down the residual rule. If the Constitution does \nnot require the President to act in his own deliberate judgment, if the Constitution does not \nrequire the President to act upon the advice of a person, if the Constitution does not require \nthe President to act after consultation with a person, the default provision is that the President \nhas to act on the advice of Cabinet.  \nThe hon. Member would recall the former President of the Republic, Mrs Ameenah \nGurib-Fakim, tried to set up a commission of enquiry on her own to investigate the ‘Sobrinho \n\n101 \n \nSaga.’ What did the government of which she was a part of do? They set up their own \ncommission of enquiry chaired by the former Chief Justice, Mr Caunhye. What did this \ncommission of enquiry say in relation to the power of the President to institute a commission \nof enquiry?  \nIt is in paragraph 8.2 of the report of the commission of enquiry, I quote – \n“It is beyond dispute that Mrs Gurib-Fakim also violated section 64(1) of the \nConstitution when she set up the Commission of Inquiry on 16 March 2018. The \nCommission of Inquiry was set up pursuant to section 2(2) of the Commissions of \nInquiry Act (...).” \nIn a case more recently, in the case of Bhunjun and His Excellency the President of the \nRepublic of Mauritius, same issue arose. This is what the Supreme Court says – \n“With regard to the facts of the present case, he recalled that the impugned decision is \none taken by respondent no. 1, the President, acting on the advice of Cabinet in \naccordance with section 2(2) of the Commissions of Inquiry Act 1944. Therefore, such \na decision is not one taken in his own deliberate judgment and the immunity conferred \non respondent no. 1 by sections 30A and 64(5) of the Constitution is not applicable \n(...).” \nIt is clear! The President does not have any power on his own to institute any commission of \nenquiry under the existing legislation. So, we are not taking anything which he does not have! \nIn fact, we are simplifying things to avoid any confusion in the mind of a President, like Mrs \nGurib-Fakim, who thought she had powers which she did not have!  \nNow, it is clear! It is the Prime Minister. Previously, it was always going to be the \nCabinet who decides. Now, it is the Prime Minister. I am sure the hon. Prime Minister will \nconsult members of his Cabinet before he decides whatever he wants to do under the \nCommissions of Inquiry Act. \nSo, we are not taking any powers of the President of the Republic, Madam Speaker. \nThe other confusion raised by the hon. Leader of the Opposition is, according to him, there \nseems to be an inconsistency in the Bill between Section 32 and Section 3. Section 32 \nprovides – \n“32.  \nRepeal \n\n102 \n \n(2)  \nAny Commission of Inquiry issued under the repealed Commissions of \nInquiry Act and which is pending on the commencement of this Act shall lapse.” \nSection 3 (3) says – \n“(3)  \nNo Board of Inquiry shall be discontinued by reason of, or otherwise affected \nby, the Prime Minister’s absence or by him ceasing to hold office whether as a result of his \ndeath or for any other reason.” \nThere is no inconsistency at all! \n Section 3 (3) is now an enabling provision which says that even if the person who \nappointed the Board of Inquiry now is no longer in office, that has no impact on the Board of \nInquiry. It was already the case under the existing law. If there was change in the President, \nthat would not have affected the working of the commission of inquiry. \nNow, coming to Section 32. To my knowledge, Madam Speaker, there is only one \ncommission of enquiry which is still pending. It relates to the circumstances under which the \ncontract of transport of petroleum products was awarded to Betamax. This issue, Madam \nSpeaker, has been the subject of numerous PQs and PNQs in this House.  \nLet me just remind hon. Members two things. On the issue of whether the contract was \nawarded in breach of the Public Procurement Act, in an answer to a PNQ, the hon. Minister \nof Commerce stated, and I quote – \n“Mr Speaker, Sir, the contract was awarded after STC was exempted from the Public \nProcurement Act and, I think, as a lawyer, the hon. Member should know.” \nAvek so foutan! As a lawyer, he should have known that there was exemption!  \nThen, in answer to one of my PQs in 2011, I asked about whether they had received \nlegal advice before signing the contract, the same hon. Minister stated – \n“In fact, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the advice of the SLO was that the agreement is \nlegally in order.” \nLet me remind the hon. Leader of the Opposition, the Minister who was answering was \nhon. Showkutally Soodhun, president of the MSM Party! So, the Minister, himself, was \nsaying that ‘the contract is valid and we received legal advice.’ \nAn hon. Member: Vice-Prime Minister! \n\n103 \n \nMr Uteem: He was Vice-Prime Minister! But at that time, he was only a Minister. But \nwhat did they do? After they came into power in 2014, they decided to stop the contract. \nWhat did Betamax do? Betamax went to arbitration in Singapore. What did the Arbitrator say \nin Singapore?  \nThe Arbitrator said: ‘I have construed all the Public Procurement Act and regulations, \nand STC was exempted from the provisions of procurement legislation in respect of the \ncontract awarded to Betamax.’ \nNow, STC was not happy with this arbitration. It went to the Supreme Court in \nMauritius. The Supreme Court said that it was against public order. So, Betamax went to our \nhighest court, Madam Speaker, which is the Privy Council. The Privy Council, in very \nelaborated details, a 41-page decision, concluded. \nThe first issue was the Supreme Court was wrong. The first thing the Privy Council \nsaid – \n“The Supreme Court was wrong in reviewing the decision of the arbitrator because the \narbitrator’s decision was final.” \nBut nonetheless, the Privy Council went on and considered the merit and it said – \n“The arbitrator reached the right conclusion in the arbitral award on the exemption of \nthe contract and reached the conclusion that it was not illegal.” \nSo, now you have what has been said in this Parliament, that the contract was valid \nafter receiving advice; what has been said in Singapore, in the arbitration, the arbitrator said \nthat it was valid; what was said in Privy Council, that the contract was not illegal, it was \nexempt from the provisions of the Procurement Act and it was valid. \nNow, after all these matters have already been settled, the government decide to put in a \ncommission of inquiry? Is that not a contempt of Court? Is that not showing disrespect for the \ndecision of the highest Court of our land? And how can it justify that it is in the public \ninterest? How can it justify that it is for the benefit of the people? The only thing that it \nmeans is harassing. It was the only purpose – and I am saying it here loud and clear – of this \ncommission of inquiry was to harass who is now the Prime Minister of this country. \nSo, what should we do? Continue to allow wastage of public funds? Continue to allow \na Judge to come and question people over matters that have already been finally determined? \nThere is nothing which the commission of inquiry can do today to reverse what has been said \n\n104 \n \nand determined by the Privy Council. Wastage of public funds, but what is important, Madam \nSpeaker, is that in answer to a PQ on 13 July 2021, the hon. Minister of Commerce informed \nthe House that the STC has paid Rs5.58 billion in damages for legal and arbitration costs. \nAnd on top of this Rs5.5 billion, they had to pay Rs153 m. only in legal fees plus Rs75 m. for \nBetamax fees. So, we are talking about Rs6 billion of wasted funds. If we had these Rs6 \nbillion, no doubt we would be able to reduce the price of petroleum products in this country. \nWhat we are doing today, Madam Speaker, is precisely to avoid any Government – not \nthis Government – which comes to power, to try to use the commission of inquiry to harass \npolitical opponents. Today, the definition of the circumstances under which a commission of \ninquiry can be held is extremely wide under the existing section 2 of the Commissions of \nInquiry Act. Why is it wide? Because when the law was passed in 1944, I had read the \nHansard, at that time there were five ordinances which were dealing with the issue of \ncommission of inquiry. We are talking about pre-independence. \nAfter the independence, we had the Constitution. So, for example, what a commission \nof inquiry could do in terms of looking into the management of governing bodies, public \nbodies, looking into the conduct of a public officer, that has been taken over by statutory \ncreatures, for example, the ombudsperson, under sections 96 and 97 of the Constitution. The \nombudsperson has the power to investigate any action taken by any officer, any authority. \nSimilarly, under section 110 of the Constitution, the Director of Audit audits all the public \naccounts and in doing so, he investigates the conduct and management of any department or \nany public service. The Public Accounts Committee also scrutinises how public funds are \nspent. \nSo, we do not need a commission of inquiry today to investigate the conduct and \nmanagement of a department or to investigate public officers. We still need, in certain cases, \nto have a Board of Inquiry. For example, where something has happened and there is a public \nconcern. I will give an example. For example, what happened in Wakashio. Up to now, we \nstill are not sure what happened in Wakashio. What happened during COVID-19, how \ndecisions were taken, no proof, no paper, we only know that billions of rupees were spent. \nWhat happened to the patients? These are things where there is a real public concern and the \npublic wants to know the truth. Here, what we can assure to this House and the population, \nMadam Speaker, is with this Government there will never be any cover-up. We will govern \nin transparency and when you look through this new Bill, there is a number of ways where \nwe are making this Board of Inquiry more transparent. \n\n105 \n \nThe appointment, the Prime Minister, he does not in catimini go and negotiates with the \nCommissioner and settle their fees. He comes to Parliament, he makes a statement, he gives \nthe terms of reference and after he gives that, all the hearings are done in public. Only \nexceptionally, the President of the Board can decide not to allow public presence. And once \nthe report is completed on the set date, the Board gives the report to the Prime Minister, and \nthe Prime Minister has 30 days to lay a copy of the report of the Board of Inquiry in \nParliament. So, Members of Parliament will have a copy. It will be in the public domain. Any \nquestion can be asked by Members of the Parliament. This is what we want, transparency. \nThat was not there in the existing Commissions of Inquiry Act. That is why we are changing \nit. \nYou know, under the existing Commission of Inquiry Act, you did not have a \ntimeframe. You can have commission of inquiries going on for years and years. For example, \nthe commission of inquiry to look into the sale of the shares which BAI company held in \nBritam. This was setup, Madam Speaker, in May 2017 but when was the report published? In \nJune 2021, four years later. No doubt because one of the members – and I will come to him \nshortly – was busy with other lucrative assignments. But now with this Bill, there is a \ntimeline set. The commission of inquiry cannot go beyond this. If we give them one month, \none year, they have to abide by this timeframe, cost. \nThis morning during PMQT, the Prime Minister shocked the whole population, this \nHouse at least. You can tell the world, because I do not think in the entire world, we have \nseen someone who is a part-timer and he earns Rs286 m. as a part-timer? And he came and \nsat on that committee for a commission of inquiry and got Rs2.2 m. Now, the Prime Minister \nis going – under this Bill – to publicise. The amount is going to come from the Consolidated \nFund. So, there will be transparency, everybody will know how much money is paid to \ncommissioners, everybody can ask questions. \nThe other novelty, conflict of interest. I am sorry I am going back again to the hon. \nGentleman, Mr Sattar Hajee Abdoula. Mr Sattar Hajee Abdoula was handpicked by the \nformer Prime Minister, because the Prime Minister is the one who gave advice to the \nPresident to make him an assessor. Who was Mr Sattar Hajee Abdoula? He was asked as a \ncommissioner to determine whether the sales by BAI company, of its shares in Britam, \nKenya, was done in a fair manner and we got value for it. \n\n106 \n \nBut who was Mr Hajee Abdoula? He was the administrator of BAI! He was the \nadministrator of BAI, he is asking people to inquire. He is going to inquire on himself but \nabove this, who was he? He was the Special Envoy of the Prime Minister who went – the \nboss – because you all heard the recording – and he asked Dawood Rawat to sell his empire \nfor one rupee. How can you be so conflicted and yet, these were the types of people which \nthe old regime would handpick to do Commissions of Inquiry because it was always \npolitically motivated, they always wanted the Commission of Inquiry to give the result that \nthey wanted to hear. \nWith this Bill, no. With this Bill, now, the Commissioner of Inquiry, any members of \nthe Board will have to make clear that they do not have any conflict of interest. It is in section \n8(2), no direct interest in the matters under inquiry and no close association with any \ninterested party. \nMadam Speaker, before resuming my seat, allow me to say just a few words, briefly, on \nwhat I consider to be the most important provision of this Bill. And this is the result of a long \nseries of judicial pronouncement. It is in section 18 of the Bill – ‘Persons likely to be \nprejudicially affected to be heard’. \nNow, what happens in practice under the existing Commissions of Inquiry? The \nCommissioners hear a lot of people and then they publicise their report. And when they \npublicise their report, very often they make comments. Some of the comments are very \nhurtful, very unwarranted and then the people who feel aggrieved, they have to go to the \nSupreme Court, sometimes to the Privy Council, only to be told that the Commission of \nInquiry ought not have put certain comments about their conduct without having given them \nthe chance to be heard. So, today in this section 18, if at any point during an inquiry, the \nBoard of Inquiry is of the view that a person’s reputation could be prejudicially affected, that \nindividual must be given a reasonable opportunity to be heard. To use the wording of the Law \nLords in the Privy Council case of Coomaravel Pyaneandee v Paul Lam Shang Leen & \nOthers – \n“A person must be given a fair opportunity to worthwhile evidence and make \nrepresentations on his own behalf.” \nIt is an elementary rule of fairness and natural justice and to make it clear, I will give an \nexample so that everybody understands what I am talking about. If during a Commission of \nInquiry on drugs, you have a notorious drug trafficker, Peeroomal Veeren and he comes to say \n\n107 \n \nthat the Leader of a leading political party is financing the import of drugs, then that person \nshould now, under this Act, have the right to be heard and clear his name. Under the existing \nlaw, they did not have this option. \nSo, Madam Speaker, this Bill is really a big avancé today. It represents a profound \nreform, offering our country a new modern legal framework with the necessary checks and \nbalances to ensure transparency, fairness and impartiality in investigation of matters of public \nconcern. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister! Yes, hon. Ramdass! \n(6.00 p.m.) \nMr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle): Merci, \nMadame la présidente.  \nMadame la présidente, d’abord permettez-moi de féliciter l’honorable Attorney \nGeneral, ainsi que le ministre des Terres et du logement pour avoir tenu notre promesse \nélectorale... \nMadam Speaker: The Ag. Attorney General! \nMr Ramdass: The hon. Attorney General and hon. Minister des Terres et du \nlogement… \nMadam Speaker: What I am saying... \nMr Ramdass: And also, Ag. Attorney General indeed... \nMadam Speaker: That’s it! \nMr Ramdass: …pour avoir tenu notre promesse électorale et présenté devant cette \nauguste Assemblée, seulement six mois après notre élection, ce projet de loi. Un projet de loi, \nMadame la présidente, qui a pour but entre autres de restaurer un climat de responsabilité et \nde restaurer un climat de transparence dans la gestion des fonds publics. Et cela, Madame la \nprésidente, à la lumière des excès de l’ancien régime. L’ancien régime qui n’a pas manqué de \nsubtiliser une loi prédatant notre indépendance pour véhiculer un agenda imminemment \npolitique.  \nMadam Speaker, it is indeed remarkable, if not concerning, that for more than 80 years \nnow, the Commissions of Inquiry Act of 1944 has remained the main legal mechanism for \n\n108 \n \ninvestigating matters of public concern. This Act, Madam Speaker, in fact, the Commissions \nof Inquiry Act 1944, conceived during the colonial era, reflects a time when Mauritius had \nyet to emerge as a sovereign democracy and as our society evolves, Madam Speaker, our \nnorms do evolve as well. Our values evolve as well, our expectations evolve as well and the \nlaw, Madam Speaker, makes no exception and ought to evolve with it as well. And a legal \nframework, Madam Speaker, cannot remain static while the society which it is meant to serve \nkeeps on advancing.  \nIn fact, the presentation of this Public Inquiries Bill, Madam Speaker, is therefore not \nonly timely but also a necessity. And in fact, it is a clear reaffirmation of our national \ncommitment to transparency, accountability and good governance.  \nMadam Speaker, in respect of the prescribed timeframe under the Bill, we must be \ncandid. Mauritius has for far too long witnessed Commissions of Inquiry that have, in fact, \nbeen undermined by perceptions of political motives, excessive delays and, in fact, outright \nsuppression of findings, Madam Speaker. Some inquiries, Madam Speaker, have been \nextended for years without any conclusive outcome. In fact, others have simply been \ndiscontinued without any explanation whatsoever.  \nAnd in fact, Madam Speaker, je me réjouis particulièrement du fait que sous les clauses \n4 et 7 du présent projet de loi, les Terms of reference du Board of Inquiry institués par le \nPremier ministre, peuvent maintenant préciser, comme l’a dit l’honorable ministre du Travail \navant moi, la date à laquelle le Inquiry Report sera soumis ; tout en offrant bien évidemment \nla possibilité à l’honorable Premier ministre de modifier ces Terms of reference quand \nl’intérêt public le requiert. Ce qui suppose donc la possibilité d’étendre l’échéance de \nl’enquête en question pour des motifs justifiables. \nAnd the Public Inquiries Bill, Madam Speaker, therefore introduces greater discipline \ninto this process. It delineates responsibility and it clearly places appropriate limits on the \npolitical discretion. And in fact, this novel provision, Madam Speaker, has the merit of \nstriking on the one hand, the right balance between the executive authority and on the other \nhand, public accountability, and in fact, a hallmark to any robust democracy. \nMadam Speaker, in respect of the holding of proceedings in public, clauses 13 and 14 \nfor example, establish the presumption that inquiry proceedings will be conducted in public. \nThose who have spoken before me have spoken lengthily about it, and in fact, it sets out the \npresumption that inquiry – as I said – will be conducted in public, unless of course, valid \n\n109 \n \nexceptions apply. And this move towards openness, Madam Speaker, enhances the public \ntrust and ensures that justice is not only done but also seen to be done. And the provisions for \npublic notices and the possibility of public engagement strengthens, in fact, this transparency \nfurther. And in fact, moving as decisively away from the secretive manner in which inquiries \nwere conducted in the past, and I am making reference here to the past ten years during which \nthis country was led by the MSM. \nMadam Speaker, in respect to the provisions for reports to be made public, in fact, in a \nmuch-welcomed move, clauses 21 and 22 of the Bill provide firstly for the mandatory tabling \nof the inquiry report before the National Assembly, and secondly, for the mandatory \npublication of every report of every Board of Inquiry in the official Government Gazette, thus \nallowing for publicity. And I must say, Madam Speaker, that under the old Commissions of \nInquiry Act 1944, there was no obligation whatsoever on the Commission of Inquiry to \npublish its report. Neither was there any obligation on the President of the Republic to cause \nany such report to be published. And this in fact, in my very humble view, Madam Speaker, \nwent against the very nature of such inquiries which are meant to address issues of public \nconcern, of public interest and of public welfare which are conducted using public funds. \nMadam Speaker, in fact, this Bill addresses this very issue in a very straightforward \nmanner, leaving no possibility or whatsoever for any derogation from the principle that every \ninquiry report must be released to the public through publication in the Government Gazette. \nHence, leaving absolutely no room for any opacity and lack of accountability. This is \nprecisely what this Government wishes to promote, Madam Speaker.  \nNow, in respect of the delay to ask for a review, Madam Speaker, it is noteworthy that \nclause 30 of the Bill reduces the delay for the institution of judicial review proceedings \nagainst any finding of the inquiry from the usual three months under common law to now 21 \ndays. This delay of 21 days, Madam Speaker, starts to run from the date of the publication of \nthe inquiry report in the Government Gazette. This is, Madam Speaker, in my very humble \nview, yet another move to show the Government’s intention to reach finality within the \nshortest possible delay. \nIn fact, the hon. Minister of Labour has spoken about this before me in respect of \npersons who are likely to be prejudiced when their names are cited before the Commission of \nInquiry. This Bill, Madam Speaker, upholds the rights of witnesses, and it is a very good \nthing that it does. In fact, clause 16 of the Bill guarantees the right to legal representation. We \n\n110 \n \nwill note that clause 18 of the Bill guarantees the right to respond to evidence presented \nbefore the inquiry. This, in fact, represents, Madam Speaker, a significant step forward in \nensuring procedural fairness and protecting individuals from reputational harm based on \nunchecked allegations. In fact, the hon. Minister of Housing and Lands had set out a series of \njudgments delivered by the Supreme Court of Mauritius in respect of the necessity of those \nwhose names have cited to be given the opportunity to defend themselves.  \nEt je dois dire, Madame la présidente, qu’en tant qu’avocat, j’accueille favorablement \ncette clause 18 du projet de loi qui requiert qu’un Board of Inquiry en fait permet à tout \nindividu dont la réputation pourrait être impactée par l’exercice d’être auditionné par le \nBoard et de soumettre des éléments de preuves pour se défendre.  \nEt soulignons, par ailleurs, Madame la présidente, que le droit de donner sa version afin \nde protéger sa réputation était toujours le droit commun de tout individu. Mais ce projet de \nloi, Madame la présidente, à la clause 18, entérine ce droit de la façon la plus claire et de \nmanière à ne plus laisser d’incertitudes quant à son application aux commissions d’enquêtes. \nCette provision, Madame la présidente, permet de faire une balance, d’une part, entre les \nattentes du public à un processus transparent, et d’autre part, le droit de chaque individu à la \nprotection de son image, de son intégrité, de sa réputation. \nMadame la présidente, nous nous rappelons tous de la commission d’enquête qui avait \nété instituée par le gouvernement MSM sur la drogue. L’institution d’une commission \nd’enquête qui avait pour but tout, mais vraiment tout, sauf combattre le fléau de la drogue qui \ngangrénait et qui gangrène toujours notre société, Madame la présidente. Une commission \nd’enquête qui avait été instituée par le MSM à des fins bassement politiques afin de marquer \ndes points politiques, sans la moindre vision pour les jeunes de ce pays. \nMadame la présidente, nous sommes tous, ici, politiciens. Nous faisions tous de la \npolitique, probablement à l’exception de vous-même. \nMadam Speaker: Exactement ! \nMr Ramdass: Et nous souhaitons tous être réélus. C’est un peu le souhait de tous, bien \névidemment, si nous sommes confiés d’une nouvelle investiture pour les prochaines \nélections. Nous souhaitons tous être réélus, Madame la présidente, mais pas à n’importe quel \nprix.  \n\n111 \n \nDe ce côté de la Chambre, Madame la présidente, contrairement au précédent régime, \nnous sommes résolument contre l’idée de voter des lois dans le but uniquement de satisfaire \nun agenda politique. Bien au contraire, Madame la présidente, nous sommes plutôt pour une \nlégislation qui cadre avec la vision de ce gouvernement, qui cadre avec les attentes de cette \npopulation, et surtout, celles de la nouvelle génération. \nDonc, en guise de conclusion, Madame la présidente, je dirais ceci: this Bill is not \nmerely a legislative reform. It is a statement of our values, a signal to the people of this \ncountry that the institutions of our democracy are being modernised to meet contemporary \nstandards of justice and integrity. The Commission of Inquiry Act 1944, Madam Speaker, \nbelongs to a bygone era.  \nThe present Bill, in fact, reflects the Mauritius we have become. It reflects the \ndemocratic future we are striving to build for this country. So, let us seize this opportunity, \nMadam Speaker, to turn the page on outdated colonial frameworks. Let us embrace a new \nlegal structure, a new legal architecture that strengthens democracy, transparency, that \nprotects our rights and especially that reinforces public trust.  \nThe enactment of this Bill, Madam Speaker, is not simply beneficial. It is a necessity. I, \ntherefore, fully support this Bill. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Narsinghen! \n(6.12 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International \nTrade (Mr H. Narsinghen): Thank you, Madam Speaker, for giving me the floor. In fact, \nbefore starting with my speech, I would like to make some comments on the speech of the \nLeader of the Opposition.  \nJ’étais très surpris par le discours du leader de l’opposition. En fait, un tiers de son \ndiscours était axé sur les pouvoirs du président de la République. Et, malheureusement, pour \nl’autre tiers de son discours, il est complètement passé à côté de la plaque. Un tiers de son \ndiscours était axé sur une sorte de démagogie. J’attendais mieux de lui pour venir avec des \nsuggestions beaucoup plus intéressantes. Malheureusement, je suis resté sur ma faim. Et un \n\n112 \n \ntiers aussi de son discours, malheureusement, il a parlé dans la généralité sans venir avec des \ndispositions concrètes de la nouvelle loi.  \nNow, here again, Madam Speaker, once again Government is coming with a new Bill. \nAs mentioned by the Acting Attorney General, it is not a mere cosmetic change. As you can \nsee, Madam Speaker, in a span of six months, in an unprecedented manner, Government has \ncome up with a string of legislations to consolidate democracy, human rights, transparency, \naccountability, equity, and above all, good governance.  \nNever in parliamentarian history have we witnessed with such a zeal to reposition \nMauritius as a cradle of democracy and good governance. In fact, Madam Speaker, we want \nto regain our prime position in Africa, in the whole world, regarding accountability and \ntransparency. Accountability and transparency are subsets of democracy and good \ngovernance. We want Mauritius to be Mauritius, not a banana republic as it has been for the \npast 10 years.  \nNow, what are the expectations in a modern society? It is high time to repeal an \noutdated law dating from 1944. The Commission of Inquiry Act cannot respond to the needs \nof a modern society where transparency and accountability have become supra-constitutional \nconcepts. As you know, Madam Speaker, as a seasoned barrister, separation of powers, for \nexample, is not clearly stipulated in the Constitution, but it is underlying. Likewise, in many \nmodern constitutions, transparency, accountability and good governance are underlying \nconstitutional principles. These principles form part of the architecture of the Constitution of \nMauritius. Not only in Mauritius, but in most of the countries championing good governance.  \nWe have witnessed recently, for the past 10 years, a sort of instrumentalization of \ncommission of inquiry to target political opponents. We have also seen overpoliticization of \nthis important tool to promote accountability and transparency, into a lethal political weapon. \nWe must understand the rationale behind the previous law and also the new law.  \nFirst and foremost, it is meant to seek the approximate truth when there is a matter of \npublic importance, focusing on public interest. This is what, unfortunately, the Leader of the \nOpposition has not been able to understand. He is referring to subjective interest. \nIn fact, when we are using this concept of public interest, it brings more objectivity. The \nPrime Minister will have to base himself on public interest before triggering any Board of \n\n113 \n \nInquiry and also take into consideration national interest as opposed to mere petty political \ninterest, partisan interest and subjective interest. The change from a Commissions of Inquiry \nAct to the Public Inquiries Bill is not a mere change of title, it is a paradigm shift. It is not \njust a change of title or name, but it lays emphasis on public interest. \nNow, regarding the targeting of political opponents, I will take only two recent \nexamples. The previous government as you know, Madam Speaker, had a sort of compulsive \nobsession to finish off/annihilate the actual Prime Minister. Who will not remember as \nalluded to by the Minister of Labour, the case of Betamax? Who will not remember that case? \nThe international arbitrator came to confirm that there was nothing wrong with the allocation \nof contract, yet the previous government appealed against this decision at the level of the \nSupreme Court. The latter reversed the decision of the arbitrators. The matter went to the \nJudicial Committee of the Privy Council. In a blockbuster decision, the Judicial Committee of \nthe Privy Council gave a sort of slap to the previous government, and incidentally, also to the \nreasoning of the then Chief Justice.  \nSurprisingly, even after the slap of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, \ngovernment dared to set up a Commission of Inquiry on the whole matter. This capricious \nand vicious decision was not only a pathological obsession against Dr. Navinchandra \nRamgoolam but also – I want to lay emphasis – a direct attack on the Judicial Committee of \nthe Privy Council, incredible but true with the previous regime. \nThe second example – it’s good to take that second example – is how the previous \nPrime Minister tried to settle scores with the previous President of the Republic, Mrs Gurib-\nFakim Ameenah. Here also, it is also good to underscore the confusion regarding the powers \nto set up a Commission of Inquiry. Regarding the Commission of Inquiry, you cannot look at \nit in isolation and this is the mistake done by the Leader of the Opposition. In fact, you have \nto read the Commission of Inquiry Act along with section 64 (1) of the Constitution as \nexplained clearly by the Minister of Labour. In fact, it must be read in conjunction.  \nIn a nut shell, only in a few instances, the President can act – the hon. Leader of the \nOpposition has to listen carefully – has to act in his own deliberate judgement and also after \nconsultation. In other circumstances, the President is bound to act upon the advice of Cabinet \nor the Prime Minister or other authorities. The present Bill comes to cure a sort of confusion, \nin fact, and it designates the Prime Minister as the sole authority to appoint a public inquiry.  \n\n114 \n \nOn the Sobrinho’s scandal, we were on the verge of a constitutional crisis. The Leader \nof the Opposition was referring to the supposedly crisis in 2002 but we were on the verge of a \ncrisis, because there was confusion and this Bill, this time, is trying to remedy this confusion \nwhich existed under the previous law. This is very important. Why did I take the second \nexample? It is to show, just as in the case of late Mr Kistnen haunting the MSM, how they \ncan instrumentalise, weaponise certain tools to kill their own people, and this is very sad. \nNow, let me, Madam Speaker, take some concrete examples to show how this present \nBill is an improvement when we compare it with the Commission of Inquiry Act. First, you \nwill see section 3 clearly defines public interest whereas before, this was not defined.  \nNow concerning section 10 to 12, we are going to see there are certain procedural \nsafeguards and the 2025 Bill, this time, offers stronger rights and protection for participants \nincluding fairness and transparency throughout the inquiry process. \nNow regarding judicial review, in fact, it was possible under the purview of the \nprevious law to have a judicial review but this time under the empire of the new law, this is \nexplicit that people within a span of 21 days can have recourse to judicial review. \nNow, regarding the terms of reference. Before, Madam Speaker, the terms of reference \nwere being dictated only by the Prime Minister whereas this time, the terms of reference can \nbe discussed; the Prime Minister can discuss with the Chairperson who will be appointed and \nthen decide on the terms of reference. \nSo, definitely, Madam Speaker, there are a number of improvements in the present Bill \nand one last point. There is a very good point, very important and interesting point which has \nbeen included in the new Bill, that is – the Commission of Inquiry is being equipped with \nmore tools, that is, the Bank will have to make a disclosure. I don’t know now whether the \nLeader of the Opposition is afraid, is scared. So many scandals by the previous government \nthat he is a bit scared that we can open the pandora’s box. This is very unfortunate.  \nSo, the Leader of the Opposition can rest assured that this Government means business. \nThe Prime Minister is a responsible person. People who are going to be appointed for future \nCommissions of Inquiry are going to do their job. We are not going to do ‘la chasse aux \nsorcières’ like they did in the past, for sure. You can rest assured, hon. Leader of the \nOpposition. \nThank you. \n\n115 \n \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: I don’t know what you are saying. You were trying to raise a point \nof order, Mr A. Duval? \nMr A. Duval: Yes, I was only drawing your attention to the fact that he was imputing \nmotives which is not proper. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, but you can’t do that by sitting down and talking to me as if we \nare in a sitting room somewhere. You have to stand up and make your point of order. Now, \nyou have the floor! \n(6.23 p.m.) \nMr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne Longue): Thank \nyou, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker, first of all, laissez-moi dire qu’il est regrettable de constater que \nl’opposition recule ici sur l’ordre des orateurs qu’autrefois été coutume qu’on puisse parler à \nla fin, clôture… \n(Interruptions) \nMs Anquetil : Jamais, jamais, jamais ! \nMr A. Duval : …le débat et le changement qui a été promis n’est pas celui qui a été \napporté et on se réfère aujourd’hui sur les mauvaises pratiques. Alors qu’ici même, moi-\nmême j’ai eu l’occasion de parler avant le Premier ministre parce qu’il y a la coutume de \npouvoir clôturer les débats pour l’opposition. Mais il est regrettable de constater. \nMadame la présidente… \nMadam Speaker: May I? Will you sit down? I want to inform hon. Members that the \nLeader of the Opposition and Mr A. Duval came to see me and asked me if it was possible for \nMr A. Duval to speak after hon. Minister Subron. I took time and I went and found out what \nthe practice has been. It seems from what I gathered – I was not here – that in the past, there \nhas been no such practice, but on the contrary – what some people are saying here – I learnt \nthat many Members of Government were speaking last and not… \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Four! \n\n116 \n \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Don’t shout while I am talking! Don’t shout while I am \ntalking!  \nMr A. Duval: Li ti met mwa katriem mem la … \nDr. Aumeer: There was a queue! \nMadam Speaker: Do not fight each other while I am on my feet.  \nOkay, so I took this and I spoke to the hon. A. Duval at tea time and I told him that he \nwill have to speak before as, unfortunately, – that is very important – I am not the one who \ndecides. I want to make this clear. The Whips are supposed to meet each other and every time \nwe have this problem in the House, you better find out once and for all, it’s not for the \nSpeaker to decide. The Whips must come to an agreement. If they don’t come to an \nagreement, it’s just too bad. I can’t do any better. \nSo, now you have the floor, please take the floor on the Bill! \nMr A. Duval: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I was indeed fourth, until I protested. But \ntout le monde est libre de constater où est le changement… \nMadam Speaker: No more comments on this! \nMr A. Duval: Alors, Madame la présidente, this Bill is a step in the wrong direction. I \nwill stress on that, wrong direction, Madam Speaker… \nMr Jhummun: Pas par limpos inn rantre ! \nMr A. Duval: There are many good measures granted. \nMadam Speaker: Let him speak, please! \nMr A. Duval: Many good measures. I will start with the good measures and then I will \ndwell on why it is a step in the wrong direction. \nMany good measures. I will start with the good measure and then, I will dwell on why \nit is a step in the wrong direction. The good measure is to bring it to Parliament. Yes. This is \nwhat is expected in a democratic society –for Commissions of Inquiries which are in the \nhands of the Prime Minister to be made public. Yes, that is one good thing. There are other \ngood things with this Bill, Madam Speaker. There is the right of appearance for those who are \nthe subject of criticisms or remarks by the Commissions of Inquiry. Yes, that is also a good \n\n117 \n \nthing. Let us note that under the previous law, the Commissions of Inquiry had the liberty to \nmake its own rules and could allow for anyone to appear before it. \nAnd, also, the other good thing about this law before I start with the rest is, Madam \nSpeaker, for the time limit to be imposed upon setting the terms of reference because \nCommissions of Inquiry have, in the past, been going on and on and then the report, has again \nslept dans les fonds des tiroirs. So, this is a good thing. \nMadam Speaker, and this will be the crux of my intervention, this could have been \nbrought with amendments to the existing law and those things that were not stipulated in the \nlaw but that were done in practice, for example, judicial review, were already well \nestablished. For example, contrary to what hon. Uteem, has said ‘payment into consolidated \nfunds’, this is already provided in the existing law but, Madam Speaker, it is a step in the \nwrong direction because we are now taking the power away from Cabinet, giving advice to \nthe President and giving solely to the Prime Minister. \nUnder the actual law, the President acts on the advice of Cabinet an appoints a \nCommission and all those issues that are determined by the President are done acting upon \nthe advice of Cabinet and my friend, hon. Uteem, is absolutely right when he quotes the \nSection of the Constitution 64 (1) which narrows down, interprets the powers of the President \nwhen he acts on the advice of Cabinet, when he acts in his own deliberate judgment etc. And \nthis has again been a taken into great details by the recent Commission of Inquiry on the \nsetting up of the Commission of Inquiry by the President.  \nMadam Speaker, therefore, the Mauritian public has to understand that, under the actual \nlaw, it is not merely the Prime Minister who decides that he wants to appoint this or that \nperson or that he wants the Commission of Inquiry to have such and such terms of reference \nor that he eventually wants to amend the terms of reference or that for example, he wants to \nallow for the payment of fees or not. It is not simply the Prime Minister; it is a collective \ndecision taken by Cabinet, deliberated upon by Cabinet and then upon the advice given to the \nPresident, the President thereafter effectively acts on this advice.  \nBut there are two layers which we are removing here; two layers of control if we can \nsay.  \nAn hon. Member: Initil!  \nMr A. Duval: Inutile for some. \n\n118 \n \nThe fist layer, it is Cabinet collective responsibility where the matter has to be debated \nand decided upon. And all those powers which we see in the Act, which are now being given \nto the Prime Minister, used to be enjoyed by the President acting on the advice of Cabinet. \nSo, that was the first layer. \nAnd then the second layer, of course, being the President himself because let us not \nforget, the President has the responsibility; a constitutional responsibility. According to \nSection 28 (1) (b) of the Constitution, he has the duty – \n“(b) \nuphold and defend the Constitution and ensure that  \n(i) \ninstitutions of democracy and the rule of law are protected; \n(ii) \nthe fundamental rights of all are respected; and  \n(iii)  the unity of the diverse Mauritian nation is maintained and \nstrengthened.” \nSo, at all time, the President of the Republic must ensure that whatever he does, is in \naccordance with section 28 (1) (b). And contrary to what the hon. Uteem said, it is not merely \na rubber stamp decision because we forget. He knows that better than anyone else that the \nPresident may refuse and resign, sure, like his father did, himself but he may refuse if he does \nnot agree and thereafter resign in protestation. That is what we had under the actual law.  \nAnd, now what will we have? We will have a Prime Minister who will enjoy sole \ndiscretion to set up a Commission of Inquiry… \nAn hon. Member: He is the Leader of the House! \nMr A. Duval: … as Prime Minister who will not have to consult Cabinet to appoint \nany member as Commissioner, a Prime Minister who can, and I say a Prime Minister because \nwe are changing the law not for one Prime Minister but for any Prime Minister; a Prime \nMinister who will be able to revoke any members of the Commission if they fall for any \nreasons stated in the law and some of these reasons are very vague, Madam Speaker, like the \nLeader of the Opposition has said.  \nIf you look at Section 9 (3), – \n“The Prime Minister may, at any time, terminate the appointment of a member on the \nground that – \n(c) \nthe member has – \n(ii) \na close association with an interested party;” \nThis is very vague, Madam Speaker, but then there are other issues. The fact, for \nexample, Madam Speaker, the Secretary to Cabinet appoints the Secretary to the Commission \n\n119 \n \nwhen we know the key sensitive function of a Secretary to the Commission who holds all the \ndocumentations, all the evidences; who knows of the agenda of the Commission, who knows \nof all the intricate and fine details of where the inquiry is leading up to. And when you \nappoint the Secretary yourself, through the Secretary to Cabinet, then il y a un risque \nd’interférence et d’influence énorme, Madame la présidente. \nIt did not use to be like that. The President used to appoint the Secretary himself. \nUsually, although the law did not provide for it but when you look at the various \nCommissions that have been set up, you will see often, it is headed by members of the \njudiciary and their secretaries, judicial secretaries or appointed as Secretary to Commissions. \nTherefore, it implies that before appointing, the President would consult with the \nCommission and it ought to have been like that, Madam Speaker. \nLike, hon. Shakeel Mohamed has rightfully stated that in New Zealand, in Canada, in \nAustralia, he has quoted that there is a risk of political interference. That is the worst of the \nworst to guarantee that a Commission can do its job properly and function properly.  \nHe is right but then we must look at what Canada, New Zealand and Australia has \ndone. Does the Prime Minister there have the power to appoint, to revoke, to withhold \npayment? No! It is done through the same mechanism that we have under the existing law. \nThe Governor in Council, in Canada, in New Zealand and in Australia, the equivalent of the \nPresident appoints. Governor in Council being of course Cabinet which decides and then in \nAustralia for example, in New Zealand, in Canada, Cabinet takes the decision. It is the same \nmechanism that is done the same, virtually the same; not the Prime Minister.  \nAnd there, Madam Speaker, it is not Secretary to Cabinet who appoints members \nincluding Secretary to Commissions there. They are given full autonomy and independence \nto appoint their own staffs, their own Advisers and their own secretaries. If we wanted to give \nthe forthcoming Board of Inquiry’s proper independence – functioning independence, we \nought to have at least consulted them with whom to appoint. That, Madam Speaker, is another \nreason why it is a step in the wrong direction. \nWe need to ask ourselves: how is this new Act going to facilitate shedding light on the \ntruth? Are we doing that? When we know that in this House, time and time again, Ministers, \nPrime Ministers have so often relied on investigations. Hon. Yeung Sik Yuen has done that \nearly on! They relied on investigations so as not to give information and not to give certain \ndocuments.  \n\n120 \n \nWe know that this House has seen so many unfortunate occurrences. Therefore, there \nare questions that arise. Given now, under this law, there is no provision, for example, for \nParliamentary Questions to be answered in Parliament on those subject matters. The question \nmust be begged. Will the hon. Prime Minister undertake to answer questions on any \ninvestigations that are ongoing or that have been suspended because there is provision to \nsuspend investigations with other investigations. \nSo, will the hon. Prime Minister… \nMadam Speaker: That are ongoing, you said? Ongoing investigation? \nMr A. Duval: Or suspended. So, will any sort of information be provided on the \nsubject? Or once an investigation is set up, will it be like it has been in the past? Will it \nsimply be a blanket to remove altogether the duty and the power of Parliament to scrutinise?  \nWe all remember in the past, since the creation of ICAC and before that, how many \ninvestigations have slept in the drawers. \nAn hon. Member: Dimann Joe! \nMr A. Duval: But then, when we give all the power and control to one person, do we \nreally rid ourselves of those risks? That is another question.  \nSo, Madam Speaker, the previous law was not flawless. Again, it could have been \namended. Instead, we are throwing the baby out of the bath water. We are doing away with \nthe law. The reasons being put forward by the hon. Ag. Attorney-General is, amongst other, \nfound in the institution of the Betamax Commission of Inquiry of being a farce, etc. \nBut, Madam Speaker, I am not going to go into the merit of a commission of inquiry \nwhich is ongoing and which is being led by a member of the Judiciary. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Gete ki papa ti al dir laba! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: …which is being led by a member of the Judiciary, who has spent \nmonths, years… \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Years? \n(Interruptions) \n\n121 \n \nMr A. Duval: …doing extensive work.  \n(Interruptions) \nYears!  \n(Interruptions) \nExtensive work! \nAn hon. Member: Akoz samem nou pe rod sanz li! \nMr A. Duval: And who must simply now accept the mandate of that commission to be \nrepealed with this Act, without any sort of transitional provision, allowing him to finish his \nwork within some sort of time frame, without any chance of coming up with a report.  \nIt is not true to say that the findings of the arbitral award of Betamax cover all the items \nunder the term of reference. I am not going to make that case here. I am only replying to what \nhas been said. It is simply not true to say that because of the arbitral award and the findings of \nthe arbitral court, this commission of inquiry must simply be done away in this manner – \nd’une manière irrespectueuse à un membre du judiciaire. That is regretful, Madam Speaker. \nI think that it ought to have been allowed. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Let him speak, please! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: It ought to have been allowed like any other Act which comes to be \nrepealed. \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: To pan demann bolom la! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: It ought to be allowed like in any other Bills whose purpose is to repeal a \nprevious one, a transitional provision. No coercion should have been made for that. \n(Interruptions) \nThat, Madam Speaker, is regretful! \n\n122 \n \nThis is why it is important to speak when you are in the Opposition – to be able to \nreply. This is why, usually, we want to reply after the last possible intervenor has done so. In \nreply to hon. Narsinghen, he is mistaken. The terms of reference being decided solely by the \nhon. Prime Minister is under this Bill. The consultations being done prior by the hon. Prime \nMinister with Cabinet was done under the existing law. But the terms of reference now being \ndecided is solely by the hon. Prime Minister. It is under this Bill. So, he is mistaken when he \nis talking about un advancement dans ce sens.  \nC’est tout le contraire, Madame la présidente. Je lui ai dit, pour moi, nous reculons, \nMadame la présidente. Il n’y a aucune raison été mis de l’avant pour justifier la concentration \ndu pouvoir autour des commissions d’enquête dans les mains de l’honorable Premier ministre \nalors que nous avons un mécanisme bien établi qui fonctionne dans tous les pays du \nCommonwealth de renom – le Canada, la Nouvelle-Zélande, l’Australie. \nOu, comme je l’ai expliqué, avec le cabinet, le conseil des ministres, la décision \ncollective, la responsabilité collective avec le président de la République, qui lui aussi, à la \nfin de la journée, a le pouvoir de refuser s’il le souhaite. Quitte à partir, cela rajoute quand \nmême deux couches de garantie. \nDonc, Madame la présidente, … \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Time over! \nMs Anquetil: Vingt minutes! \nMr Jhummun: Time is up! \nMr A. Duval: Madame la présidente,… \nMadam Speaker: You are concluding, of course. \nMr A. Duval: Yes, thank you. Madame la présidente, for all the reasons that have been \ngiven, I think people will now fear to come and depone more so than before. Because do not \nforget that commissions of inquiry are usually, in a democratic country, set up to investigate \nacts and doings against the government of the day. But now that there is the risk of \ninterference, as I have said, with the appointment of the Secretary to the Commission… \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Incroyable! \n\n123 \n \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Do not repeat! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: It will not, unfortunately, Madam Speaker, help at all our meagre ranking \nin Transparency Mauritius. It will not help us improve, unfortunately! Not this sort of \nlegislation! I think it is a step backward. It is, in fact, Madam Speaker, regrettable that we \ncould not change the existing law. \nMadam Speaker: You have said that three times! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: Madame la présidente, …. \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Pa Pravind ki la! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Try to conclude! \n Mr A. Duval: I am concluding.  \nI think, Madame la présidente, le pays ne s’en sortira pas du tout gagnant. Merci. \nMadam Speaker : Je vous en prie.  \nAlors, maintenant, l’honorable ministre de la Sécurité sociale ! \n(6.46 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity (Mr A. Subron): Thank you, Madam Speaker. I will come back to the speech of the hon. Leader of \nthe Opposition and hon. A. Duval later. \nFirst of all, let me say that this Bill opens a wind of change. This Government brings \nyet another visionary tool to reshape public interest issues in Mauritius. The Public Inquiries \nBill, which will replace a more than 80 years old Commission of Inquiry Act, heralds a \nsignificant shift on how matters of public interest and public importance will henceforth be \ninvestigated for the benefit and betterment of the Mauritian society and its people. \n\n124 \n \nMy party, Rezistans ek Alternativ, as a partner in the Alliance du Changement, fully \nsupports this Bill. A Commission of Inquiry is one of the many bodies available to a country \nto inquire into various public interest issues, sometimes on controversial ones. Commission \nor Board of Inquiry reports findings, gives advice and makes recommendations. While the \nfindings are not legally binding, they can be highly influential and act as drivers of societal \nprogress. Commissions of Inquiry reflect social movements and social concerns of particular \nmoment in time.  \nMadam Speaker, Commissions of Inquiry can be great tool of social emancipation and \nprogress. In Mauritius, social upheavals against the harsh exploitation under colonial \ncapitalism produced two major colonial commissions of inquiry. The dialectics of social \nstruggles and colonial commissions of inquiry laid the foundation of social progress in \nMauritius. After the major upheavals, riots, strikes in various parts in Mauritius in 1937 \nwhich resulted in the killing of three labourers, the British colonial government instituted the \nHooper Commission of Inquiry. The Hooper Commission lifted the ban on workers to \norganise and gave birth to the right for the workers of Mauritius to unionise in 1938. \nThe 1943 strike of labourers when Anjalay Coopen and her comrades lost their lives, \nprompted the colonial government to institute the Moody Commission of Inquiry in 1944. \nThe Moody Commission paved the way for the genesis of the welfare system in Mauritius \nand the birth of local democracy in rural Mauritius through the creation of village councils. \nWe can also refer to some examples in other countries. In South Africa a variant of the \nCommission of Inquiry was set up in 1996 after the end of apartheid. The Truth and \nReconciliation Commission of South Africa was a court-like restorative justice set up by \nNelson Mandela and chaired by Desmond Tutu. The Commission invited witnesses, who \nwere identified as victims of gross human rights violations, to give statement about their \nexperiences and selected some for public hearings. Perpetrators of violence could also give \ntestimony and request amnesty from both civil and criminal prosecution. The Institute for \nJustice and Reconciliation was established in 2000 as the successor organisation of the Truth \nand Reconciliation Commission of South Africa.  \nIn Australia, prompted by public outcry over the high number of indigenous deaths in \ncustody during the 1980s, the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody was set \nup. It investigated 99 cases between 1980 and 1989. While it found no evidence of unlawful \nkillings, it highlighted systemic issues such as inadequate care and the impact of alcohol \nabuse. The Commission made 399 recommendations aimed at reducing indigenous \n\n125 \n \nincarceration and improving custodial conditions. Here again, we see the dialectical relations \nbetween historical socio-struggles and institutional commission of inquiry resulting in social \nemancipation and/or human rights advancements. \nMadam Speaker, yet commissions of inquiries or boards of inquiry can be and have \nbeen used as tools against political opponents. While the primary purpose of such \ncommissions is to investigate matters of public interest and improve recommendations, they \ncan be strategically manipulated to target and undermine political rivals. For instance, a \ncommission might be established to investigate a particular matter but its terms of reference \ncan be subtly designed to ensnare a specific political figure or party. The commission’s \nfindings, regardless of their validity, can be used to damage the reputation or political \nstanding of the target even if there are no actual wrong doing. Examples are numerous in \nmany countries and in Mauritius, too. The latest two of such politically motivated \ncommissions of inquiry in Mauritius being the Betamax Commission of Inquiry and the \nCommissions of Inquiry set up in the context of the institutional crisis, the tug of war, under \nthe previous regime, between the Presidency and the then Prime Minister.  \nMadam Speaker, I support this Bill for the following reasons. Many of the reasons have \nbeen highlighted by my colleagues and hon. Members. The first one is the updating of an 80 \nyears old law. I am very surprised to hear hon. Adrien Duval saying that we must amend an \n80 years old law and not come with a new legislation. This decontextualises constitutional \nevolution in Mauritius and laws in Mauritius. We cannot just take something dated 88 years \nand just plug in amendments like this; you decontextualise the law evolution.  \nIt is very important to come with a new law because, precisely, the same inherent \nresidual inconsistencies and clumsiness since the advent of independence and the Republic in \n1992, needed to be addressed and cleared in law so as to leave no ambiguities, no misuse, as \nwe have seen in the last wrangle under the previous regime, between the Presidency and the \nPrime Minister, event which occurred in 2018. \nFirst, let us mention that the Constitution, as my colleague mentioned, with the advent \nof the Independence in 1968 and Republic in 1992, established clearly in section 44 the clear \nline of demarcation of the Prime Minister’s and the exercise of President’s functions. It is \nclear in section 64 that no President of the Republic can act without the advice of the Cabinet \nor, for that purpose, to hon. A. Duval, or of a Minister acting under the general authority of \n\n126 \n \nthe Cabinet. And there is no one more important in the Cabinet than the Prime Minister, \nhimself.  \nWhen Mauritius became a Republic, various amendments were brought to various \npieces of legislation in Mauritius in 1991. The Commissions of Inquiry Act 1944 was one of \nthese legislations. There were 10 amendments brought to the Commissions of Inquiry Act \n1944 to replace wherever it appears the term “Governor-General” with “President”. Thus, the \nCommissions of Inquiry Act 1944 starts with the section 1(2) where it says: the President \nmay issue a commission (…) into any matter relating to the public service (...) etc. The \n‘President’, here, in this section, has only replaced ‘Governor-General’. This was the \namendment brought in 1991 just a few months before Mauritius became a Republic in 1992. \nThus, when reading the Commissions of Inquiry Act 1944, separately as rightly stated \nby my colleagues, from section 64 of the Constitution, one can come to the erroneous \nconclusion that the President of the Republic can appoint a Commission of Inquiry. This was \nthe erroneous reading which brought the constitutional crisis between the previous Prime \nMinister and the then President of the Republic.  \nAnd this is why I do not understand the reasoning of the hon. Leader of the Opposition. \nWhere was he in 2018 when a General Notice was published; General Notice 803 in the \nGovernment Gazette which instituted a Commission of Inquiry for the purported appointment \nof a Commission of Inquiry by Mrs Ameenah Gurib-Fakim, former President of the Republic \nor about 16 March 2018, more precisely, to inquire on the circumstances relating to the non-\ncompliance with the constitutional and legal provisions of the established administrative \nprocedure applicable to the appointment of the above Commission of Inquiry? Where was the \nLeader of the Opposition? I do not know! Was he part of this decision to establish this \nCommission of Inquiry where one of the terms of reference was precisely to inquire whether \nthe power of the Cabinet and any person acting on behalf of the Cabinet?  \nSo, the present Bill, now in the spirit of the Constitution, clarifies the legal framework \nto leave no ambiguities, no legal, no erroneous interpretation. It reestablishes in the law, \nclearly the constitutional principle that the institution of a Commission of Inquiry is the \nprerogative of the Executive, the Cabinet or a Minister acting under the general authority of \nthe Cabinet. The Bill, now in the spirit of the Constitution, confers clearly this power to the \nPrime Minister who is after all, the Chief of the Cabinet – the Prime Minister and Leader of \nthe House. The Bill leaves no ambiguity, no room as to who has the power to nominate a \n\n127 \n \nCommission of Inquiry. It spares us from the institutional crisis which bears the imprint of \nthe previous regime. The previous regime did not dare draw the lessons of the previous \ndangerous constitutional crisis between the previous Prime Minister and the former President \nof the Republic. We dare. We are bringing the necessary amendments with the new Public \nInquiries Bill. Where they failed, we act. \nAn hon. Member: Yes! \nMr Subron: Madam Speaker, when I heard hon. Duval say that we must amend the 80-\nyear-old legislation – I am new to this Assembly but I cannot understand the reasoning of \nsuch a proposal.  For me, it is like a colonially tainted proposal. To amend a piece of \nlegislation dating back to 80 years and during this period, we had independence; during this \nperiod, we had the republic, we had evolution, I just cannot understand how these kinds of \nideas still persist after independence and after the advent of the republic in our country. \nMadam Speaker, in addition to addressing the legal issues, we mentioned the legal \nimbroglio. The new Public Inquiries Bill will be bringing at least four – I would just mention \nit, my colleagues mentioned it, just for the record – major qualitative leap forward. The Bill \nopens the door for public access and scrutiny to proceedings of Board of inquiry. This is \nclearly stated in section 13 that all reasonable steps as may be necessary should be taken to \nensure that members of the public – I requote this one – so that the Chairperson can decide – \nthis is new – to allow broadcasting of proceedings of an inquiry which may be made. And \nthis is very important in digital time. Like we have public broadcasting of this Parliament, we \ncan have public broadcasting of public inquiries and I think this is very novel in the piece of \nlegislation. \nThe second leap forward is putting the time bar for the completion of the Board of \nInquiry which was mentioned by many of my colleagues and it is mentioned in two sections, \nin section 4 and section 6. Under section 4, the Terms of reference of the Board of Inquiry, \none of the terms of reference is to set the date by which the inquiry report shall be submitted. \nUnder section 6, it is the duty to inform the Assembly, “where the Prime Minister proposes to \nset up a  Board of Inquiry”. The Prime Minister has to state in the terms of reference, the date \nby which the inquiry report shall be submitted. \nThe third leap forward is that it is mandatory to make public the report of the Board of \nInquiry. This is mentioned in section 21 – Laying of inquiry report before Assembly and it is \n\n128 \n \nmentioned in section 22 – Publication of inquiry report in Gazette. These two new clauses in \nthe new Bill are very important. \nThe fourth leap forward is a critical clause to protect the rights of persons likely to be \nprejudicially affected. This is mentioned in section 18 of the Bill. \nMadam Speaker, in conclusion, I would say that we live in 2025, that this Bill brings a \nwind of change in the country, like we have been doing for the last five months. And in the \nfuture, we do believe that debates should be held in the National Assembly, in the country on \nthe possibility to be Members of the National Assembly, the power to instigate commission \nof inquiries and their terms of reference, by way of Motion or otherwise as practiced in \nvarious democracies.  \nIn the meantime, I must say that Rezistans et Alternativ is proud to be part of the \npolitical forces bringing in this new law of public interest. As part of the Alliance du \nChangement and as a party strongly committed to public transparency, truth and evidence-\nbased political decision, we support this Bill. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Prime Minister! \n(7.05 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: Thank you, Madam Speaker. The current Commissions of \nInquiry Act, as many orators have said, hon. Members have said, dates back to 1944. I hardly \ncan understand how hon. A. Duval says we should keep that Act and amend it. Its structure, \nits functioning are completely outdated and no longer provide an adequate response to the \nvariable complexity of the matters that may in a modern society require the scrutiny of a \nstatutory inquiry. \nFirst of all, Madam Speaker, let us look at what, recently, the commissions of inquiries, \nunder the previous regime, have come out with. When the former Justice of the Supreme \nCourt, Mr Lam Shang Leen, and his two members made a serious and sustained effort to \nreach the truth in connection with the social scourge of drug trafficking, which has increased \nvastly in recent years, what happened to his alarming findings and shocking conclusions? \nThey disappeared into a void. The former government ignored most of his recommendations \nand it cost the taxpayers Rs12 million. Most of his recommendations were ignored. \n\n129 \n \nSimilarly, when a public inquiry was set up to examine the conduct of the former \nPresident of the Republic, – the Leader of the Opposition was talking about trying to \npoliticise things – it subsequently appeared to have originated from an anonymous letter, \nconcocted in the Prime Minister’s Office by a Special Adviser of the then Prime Minister, \nwho then promised to lay the letter before this House for scrutiny. It was predictably \nunfulfilled. That promise was never kept. No letter was ever deponed here, in the Assembly. \nIt cost the taxpayers Rs10.5 million.  \nWhen the Commission of Inquiry on Horse Racing was set up in 2014, its preliminary \nreport mysteriously disappeared after the general elections of December 2014. The interim \nreport was, I think, deponed and tabled only in 2017 by the then government. Not by the then \ngovernment; it was tabled by the then Leader of Opposition, the hon. Member’s father, Mr \nXavier-Luc Duval. He was the one who tabled it. It was never tabled in front of the House.  \nThe Commission’s findings and conclusions were submitted by the then President of \nthe Republic, Mr Kailash Purryag, to the then Prime Minister in March 2015. I remember I \nhad purposely rung the then President to ask him to make sure that the then Prime Minister \ngets the report because it was an important report. It was about what was happening at the \nMauritius Turf Club. The President told me that he has asked his rider to go and leave the \nreport at the PMO. A question was put to the then Prime Minister in Parliament. Without \nflinching an eye, he said that he had never received the report. It disappeared completely! \nAn hon. Member: As usual! Aussi simple que ça ! \nThe Prime Minister: When international arbitrators awarded billions of rupees in \ndamages against the reckless and irresponsible political scorched-earth policy of the previous \ngovernment in the Betamax case, dismissing the previous government’s case – the arbitration \nfor that politically motivated abuse and as lacking any shred of evidence; when the Privy \nCouncil dismissed with disdain the government’s legal challenge to the award, and the \nindependent DPP rejected the trumped-up Police investigation for the bogus smokescreen it \nalways was, what did the previous government do? Precisely what the Leader of the \nOpposition, who was a member of the then government, if I remember, is complaining now! \nHe now seems to be worried about the exact figures.  But this is what happened under the \nprevious government!  \n\n130 \n \nLet me give you a concrete example of how the previous government weaponised \ncommissions of inquiries to settle political scores. The House may recall – we spoke about \nhim this morning – how the now notorious Sattar Hajee Abdoula, with the connivence of the \nformer Prime Minister, together, tried to convince Mr Dawood Rawat to get rid of the BAI \nGroup of companies for the symbolic sum of Rs1, with the promise that if he did this, the \ngovernment will not harm him or his daughters. This is what was done!  \nMr Rawat, to his credit, categorically rejected this poisonous offer. Yet, – I cannot \nremember. I think hon. Uteem mentioned it – the very same Sattar Hajee Abdoula was \nappointed as an Assessor of the Commission of Inquiry on the Disposal of Shares of the BAI \nCompany Ltd, and also, with the related Britam Holdings Ltd in Kenya. If this was not a \ndirect conflict of interest, then what was it? What was the guarantee under the previous \nCommission of Inquiry? What was happening then? This is exactly what we want to prevent \nactually.  \nIt is worth pointing out that one of the recommendations of the Commission of Inquiry, \nchaired by former Judge Bhushan Domah, was that criminal actions should be initiated \nagainst former Minister Roshi Bhadain for his malevolent acts in the sale of the shares of \nBritam Holdings Ltd of Kenya. This is what Judge Domah said. And what did Mr Bhadain \ndo? He swore an affidavit where he pointed out that one of the Assessors, Mr Sattar Hajee \nAbdoula, is a bosom friend of the former Prime Minister and, therefore, he is judge and party \nin this case. That was the end of the matter! Finished! Forget it! In the drawer!  \nThese three Commissions, Madam Speaker, cost the taxpayers a total of Rs32.7 million \nwith no result to show. Nobody in the House had any idea what the Commission of Inquiry \nsaid or did. These Commissions of Inquiry were set up for the wrong reasons. Their findings, \nconclusions and recommendations were completely ignored, left to sleep in the yellowing \npages of newspapers and the dusty drawers of the administrative inertia! We have seen such \npatterns for the last lost, wasted decade. Inquiries have come and gone. They might as well \nhave never happened. \nLet us come to the inquiry on Betamax which, we have been told, was stopped on \npurpose by the same Mr Bhadain. This is what he has been campaigning about. Let us look at \nthe facts. The case went for arbitration in Singapore, presided by a UK former judge with \nhigh reputation – high reputation. The Arbitrator stated, after having examined everything, \n\n131 \n \nthat the allegations of fraud were completely unsubstantiated. There was no proof of any \nimpropriety.  \nIf you look at the law, arbitration should have been the end of the matter. But no! The \ngovernment then decided that the findings of the arbitration should be relooked at by the \nSupreme Court as it was against public policy. In spite of the fact, as I said, the International \nArbitration Act says that an award should be final and the courts should not readily intervene. \nHowever, the Supreme Court intervened and cancelled the arbitration award. Betamax went \nto the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council to appeal.  \nLook at what the Privy Council said. The Privy Council said that the Supreme Court of \nMauritius was not entitled to review the Arbitrator’s decision. The contract was not illegal. \nThere was no impropriety. It added that the Supreme Court cannot, under the guise of public \npolicy, reopen issues that were settled. That is what the Privy Council said! Une claque \nmagistrale à notre Cour suprême ! That is what happened.  \nThat should have been the end of the matter. But the then government wanted to \ninitiate, after the Privy Council had pronounced itself, a Commission of Inquiry as a fig leaf, I \nsuppose, to disguise the slap they had just received after a final judgment of the Privy \nCouncil. I think hon. Minister Uteem rightly said it: that action is a contempt of court. Du \njamais vu! Do you know how many years after they started a Commission of Inquiry? It is \npractically after 15 years that a Commission of Inquiry started!  \nIt was a sustained dishonest campaign. A conspiracy at the highest level to manufacture \nevidence, especially against me, but also against Minister Bachoo. This was the purpose!  \nHon. A. Duval should have looked at what his own father said at the Commission of \nInquiry. I suppose you did not look! \nMr A. Duval: I was there! \nThe Prime Minister: You were there? Then, you did not hear anything! You were \nthere for nothing because you should have seen what he has said! \nAn hon. Member: Linn gagn amnesia!  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Li ti dan happy hour! \n\n132 \n \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, they set up a public inquiry to cover the \nembarrassment after la claque qu’ils ont reçue. There was never the slightest basis for such \nan inquiry after the Privy Council has pronounced itself.  \nIt was, in fact, meant to find ways and means to taint our reputation with invidious \ncharges. Nothing more! In awarding over USD 100 million against the State, which we had to \npay, which the taxpayers had paid, the distinguished, independent international Arbitrator \nscathingly dismissed the previous government’s supposed justification as lacking even the \nsemblance of plausibility. After thoroughly reviewing all evidence the Government had put \nforward, they found no basis to suggest that any impropriety whatsoever had occurred.  \nAs I said, these findings of the arbitrator were supported by no less a court than the \nJudicial Committee of the Privy Council which decided that the previous government’s case \nto be spurious and founded on elementary misconceptions of the law. In taking its decisions \nagainst Betamax – we all know, of course, Madam Speaker, that the previous government \nwas assisted by legal geniuses. Some of whom to this day, no doubt continue to offer their \nlegal services, their legal wisdom at considerable cost to their unsuspecting clients. They are \nstill taking money out of people. \nMr Jhummun: Bez kas! \nThe Prime Minister: But no cost will be ever as great as the cost to Mauritius of their \nreckless, politically motivated, and foolish advice.  \nMr Bhadain – all he has been talking about – was instrumental in both the BAI \nCommission of Inquiry and also the Betamax one, and he continued to make unsubstantiated \nallegations during the campaign.  \nAs I say, you should have heard – if you were there, I don’t know why you didn’t hear \nit – what the former Deputy Prime Minister, Xavier-Luc Duval said. He said he did not agree \nwith that decision of Cabinet. He told Cabinet that this is a wrong decision. He was there at \nthe beginning. He knows there was no impropriety and that it was going to cost us money. He \neven called in the then Solicitor General, Mr Dheerendra Dabee, and asked him his opinion, \nand Mr Dheerendra Dabee told to him that he was completely opposed to the cancelling of \nthat contract and that the government will have to pay heavy damages if they do that.  \n\n133 \n \nBut they instituted the Commission of Inquiry 15 years later; as hon. Uteem just said, it \nwas a contempt of court and it would have been challenged. Had there been this interference \nas we think there would have been, they would have been challenged in front of the Privy \nCouncil again. Mr Bhadain should be exposed, Madam Speaker, for what he is, like a vulture \nwith a mixture of venom and ignorance - ignorance! What he has been doing is reprehensible, \nbeyond contempt. This is what SSR used to call a flash in the pan. He has been reduced to a \npolitical past, political clown I should say. Ready to do anything, to cling to even concrete for \nhis survival. I know, Madam Speaker, you might say he is not in the House, but it is precisely \nbecause of this that I am dragging him here, to expose him. What a loud mouth demagogue \nhe has been; dangerous demagogue! This is the background of the Betamax case.  \nThe Mauritius public is now asked to support many more millions of rupees to be \nexpended on a pointless public inquiry purely for political ends and because the previous \ngovernment could not accept the responsibility of its own flagrant abuses.  It has been \nproved; two judicial tribunals, including the highest in the Commonwealth have denounced it. \nWe know that the previous government didn’t care about money; we heard this morning. \nThey have brought the economy of our country to its knees.  \nThe House, Madam Speaker, has a duty to put an end to this long legacy of waste, self-\nenrichment and abuse. If they were left to continue, it would cost again the hard-pressed \ntaxpayer even more millions. This is what would have been the result. We all too plainly \nknow the cynical exploitation and abuse of the State’s resources to which the government \nunhesitatingly resorted to whenever its political and personal interests required. \nWhen this ‘Missie Moustass’ leaks exposed their shame in all its nakedness for all the \nworld to see, placing on show the toady, corrupt and abusive nature of this criminal gang \nwhich had seized and maintained control of the country by fraud and by lies, what was their \nfirst response? Yes, Madam Speaker, they announced a public inquiry into the leaks. Never!  \nIt never happened! There was never a public inquiry; it was never even started. It was just a \nshow because the elections were there, people were revolting.  So, they said there would be \nan inquiry, but no inquiry was ever done! \nBut the Mauritian people put this, what I could call a dying serpent out of its misery, \nwhose coils had wrapped themselves around the country and at least, we saved the country’s \npublic purse. And what has been the cost of all these? Tens of millions of rupees, as I said \n\n134 \n \nearlier, by the government on sterile exercises of political self-justification, not counting the \ntime. We don’t put the time of what the civil servants had put in, which properly accounted \nfor even more tens of millions of rupees.  \nYet, not a single recommendation has been adopted; not a line of any of the reports \ndebated in this Chamber – nobody knows what is in the Commission of Inquiry. No official \ngovernment response. That shows, Madam Speaker, that in the hands of the previous \ngovernment, there were no more than colourable devices again. They were never intended for \nthe purposes for which public inquiries are supposed to exist: to cast light on social ills or \npublic mischiefs, to establish the truth of tragic events, to apportion responsibility and to lead \nto the diagnosis and remedy the causes.  \nFirst, then, we will put an end to that shameful chapter and abusive inquiries of the \nprevious government. Secondly, we will ensure that the conclusions and recommendations of \nthe inquiry will not simply be ignored by future governments. They will have to be debated in \nthis Chamber; this never happened before. The government will have to publish a formal \nresponse, recommendation by recommendation to a report.  \nNow, I heard hon. Duval; it’s a misconception, complete misconception of the \nConstitution, of our system of government. We have a Cabinet system of government here, \nnot a presidential system. The President has to act on the advice of Cabinet and as I think \nMinister Subron just said: who is the Head of the Cabinet? The Prime Minister, perhaps you \ndon’t know, meets the President every Thursday morning. It’s in the Constitution. I have to \nkeep the President informed. I meet him every Thursday morning. He is kept informed. When \nwe propose a Bill, he sees the Bill. If he has anything to say, he says it. This is how the \nCabinet system of Government works. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Li pa kone li! \nThe Prime Minister: The determination of this Government is to widen, to deepen and \nstrengthen our democracy. In fact - I don’t know where he is getting his quotations -, in \nCanada and in the UK, this is the system. The UK has the same system, go and look; the \nsame system that we are putting here. The Public Inquiries Bill before the House provides for \na legally robust framework in the conduct of public inquiries into matters of significant public \nimportance. It provides for the setting up of a Board of Inquiry with much wider powers than \nexisted before. Events having caused public concerns or capable of causing public concerns; \n\n135 \n \nthat also has to be taken in account as well as where there is a public concern that a particular \nevent may have happened.  Sometimes, it is like this. It will now fall under the scope of that \nnew Board of Inquiry. \nThe Bill creates for more specific and detailed terms of reference. Additionally, and \nperhaps hon. A. Duval doesn’t know how we decide the terms of reference. It is in Cabinet \nthat we decide the terms of reference. But that’s how it is.  \nMr A. Duval: Where is the … \nThe Prime Minister: The Prime Minister is in the Cabinet, if you don’t know. He \nheads the Cabinet. This is how I just said it is done. \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Li krwar lot kabine la sa! \nThe Prime Minister: You are thinking of the ‘Kitchen Cabinet’, I think. That’s what \nyou are referring to. It’s not the ‘Kitchen Cabinet’ here. It’s the real Cabinet. It will now be \npossible for the Prime Minister to consult the proposed Chairperson of the Board before \nsetting up the terms of reference instead of just putting terms of reference and you see the \nChairperson say: ‘I don’t like his; I don’t like that’. At least, we have consultations, and he \nwill be able to respond to these terms of reference. \nFurthermore, there shall be a statutory duty to inform the National Assembly. This is \nnot the case with the actual Commissions of Inquiry Act. We will have to inform. When a \nBoard of Inquiry has been or will be set up, the terms of reference will be seen in the National \nAssembly. You will see who shall be appointed as Chairperson and also whether the Prime \nMinister has appointed or proposes to appoint any other member.  \nAdditionally, and most importantly, in order to avoid the delays, we have seen in the \npast with former Commissions of Inquiry, there will now be a statutory duty to state the date \nby which the inquiry report must be submitted to the National Assembly. It cannot go on for \nyears and years. That Commission of Inquiry on Betamax was 15 years ago - they were \ncalling us to say. Even your father told the judge, ‘Madam it’s 15 years ago! How to you \nexpect me to remember everything? It’s impossible.’ \n\n136 \n \nThis will not be the case now. There will be a statutory duty to state the date by which the \ninquiry report will have to be submitted.  \nFurthermore, in a spirit of transparency, while the Commissions of Inquiry Act \nprovides an option as to whether the inquiry shall or shall not be held in public, this one \nmakes statutory provision for the Board of Inquiry to be held in public, unless for some \nreasons, security reasons perhaps, the Board decides otherwise.  \nThe new Bill also makes provision for members of the public to be able to obtain or \nview a record of the evidence given and the documents produced or provided during the \nproceedings of the Board of Inquiry. Your father complained and I also wanted to. I wanted \nto know what other people have said so that I can rebut the arguments. They said, “No! No! \nYou can’t have it.” At the end, they told me that I could go and look at it - all sorts of boxes \nof documents -, and that I had to do it within three days. Not possible! What’s the point of \nhiding it? \nWe have seen in the past how many people have had their reputation damaged by their \nnames being mentioned in the reports of the Commissions of Inquiry. They had to go for \njudicial review after that, when they could have done it there and then. We have seen how \nthere had been no explanations sought from these persons, who then had to go to the Supreme \nCourt for a judicial review. I had to do it myself, and I won; on top of that, I won. Out of the \nfive complaints I made, I won four. On the fifth one, they said it was a balance, maybe yes or \nmaybe no.  \nIn a spirit of fairness, the Public Inquiries Bill makes provision for any person, who, in \nhis/her opinion, their reputation is likely to be affected by public inquiry, they can be heard, \nthey can be given evidence, they can produce documents, and they can see what has been said \nagainst them. \nAccording to the Bill – \n“The Prime Minister shall, not later than 30 days after receipt of the inquiry report \nunder section 20, lay a copy of the inquiry report before the Assembly, [on the Table of \nthe National Assembly].” \n In words, it will not disappear in a drawer. You will have the chance to look at it. \nFurthermore, the Board of Inquiry shall, not later than 30 days after the submission of the \nreport to the Prime Minister, publish it in the Government Gazette so that everybody can look \nat it. \n\n137 \n \n And there will be a new statutory duty on the government to respond to the report; not \njust lay it on the Table. You can debate on it.  But this does not mean that the government \nwill be obliged to accept each and every one of the conclusions. It will rather mean that the \npublic will be able to see what the arguments were, what the government proposes to do \nabout whatever mischief identified by the inquiry. These measures will also ensure that the \nwork of the Board will be conducted in a transparent manner and made accessible to the \npublic at large. \nHon. Uteem rightly pointed out about this drug baron or drug peddler who would say \nthat he knows who, in the government, has been financing, taking money from the drug \nbarons for the elections. This has been thrown under the carpet. \nTo conclude, Madam Speaker, let me reaffirm that the Government, today, is honouring \nits commitment to provide clear parameters for the conduct of public inquiries, including, as I \nsaid, a strict time frame for such inquiries. We are repealing the Commissions of Inquiry Act \nand replacing it by a modern, transparent and comprehensive legislation. The Government is \ntaking steps to ensure that the purposes of the public inquiry are genuinely fulfilled and not \nabused like it has been done in the past; and the reports are not simply ignored. In fact, the \nreports were never known.  \nHere, you will get a chance to see how much it has cost. And you can see the fairness, \nthe independence and accountability of the whole process of this public inquiry, with the \nrights of everyone who might be affected by the findings of an inquiry report. They have the \nright to come and depone.  \nI have repeatedly said, Madam Speaker, that one of the imperative missions of this \nGovernment is to restore integrity, pride and independence to the constitutional, democratic \nand civic institutions in which the freedom and strength of any nation principally resides. The \nBill contributes to that cause. \nThank you, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Ag. Attorney General! \n(7.32 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Housing and Lands (Mr S. Mohamed): Madam Speaker, I would \nlike to, first and foremost, thank all Members who have spoken. I have listened very carefully \nto all the speeches and more so, to that of the intervention of hon. Prime Minister just before \nme.  \n\n138 \n \nI would like to also thank, right away; not at the end of my intervention, the officers of \nthe office of the Attorney General, the Attorney General himself who has put on a lot of \neffort in the work that he has produced; we are all very thankful to him and I wish him a \nquick recovery. \nHowever, I would like to add, I do not think I had to but then I think sometimes, it is \nnecessary to underline important events. I mean when I based myself on the intervention of \nthe hon. Leader of the Opposition and hon. Adrien Duval, it is necessary for me to refer to the \narbitral award, the final award in Singapore of the arbitration matter, the Singapore \nInternational Arbitration Centre between Betamax and the State Trading Corporation. \nLet me say here that this is dated 05 June 2017 and people will start to understand that \nwhen I read that particular document, the Table of Contents, on Issue 4, it is written at page \n45, the contract/agreement that Betamax had including the arbitration agreement, illegal – \nthere was a question that the arbitrators had to answer – \n“Is it illegal and unenforceable?’’  \nThis is one of them main issues that they had to cover. I say that today because hon. A. Duval \nsaid that there are issues that were not covered. Let us say that he is wrong there, I say that \nrespectfully. It was covered. I took it upon myself, not to just come up with statements but I \nwent through the award to make sure that what I am saying, I have verified it, counter-\nchecked it and I am therefore convinced that what hon. A. Duval is saying is not right. \nSo, let me also say that maybe if he has missed that part, I am sure he has also missed \nthe other part. And, I say it sans hesitation – one of the lawyers who participated in this \nwhole scandalous process, Ravindra Chetty, Senior Counsel, was the one, strangely enough, \nrepresenting some element of the ‘Kitchen’ in those days. Anyway, kulchoul, bartan we call \nit. You know? Bartan! \nSo, then when I read this particular Issue at page 46, is it illegal and I will read parts of \nwhat the arbitrator said, Paragraph 170 – \n“The Tribunal has found that STC has failed to discharge its burden of proving that the \nagreement was agreed as part of a conspiracy to commit an unlawful act under either \ninterpretation. \nThe Tribunal has found that the PPA was not breached …” \nI can go on and I will, at Paragraph 182 – \n\n139 \n \n“This Tribunal rejects the submissions of the STC. Specifically, the Tribunal does not \nfind Mr Bhunjun give evidence that was untrue in his first statement, or at all …” \n184. This explanation is plausible and entirely consistent with Mr Bhunjun’s first \nwitness statement, having found that Mr Bhunjun was not untruthful as alleged by the \nSTC… ”  \nLet’s pause, ‘as alleged by the STC’, allegedly Mr Bhunjun was lying only to satisfy the head \ncooks of that ‘Kitchen’.  \n“That allegation cannot provide a basis for the tribunal to draw the inference alleged.” \nMadam Speaker, do you know upon what the STC caused losses to the coffers of this \ncountry, taxpayers’ money to be paid? \nOn inferences to satisfy the head cooks of the day! \nMr Etwareea: Cinq milliards! \nAn hon. Member: Six milliards! \nMr Mohamed: You know what is shocking? The hon. Prime Minister referred to one \nof the sous-fifre who was helping to cook away – hon. Bhadain, former Minister. He was part \nand parcel of this whole mess. So, it is when he was part of parcel of this whole mess, having \nbrought an end to the agreement that it caused losses to the country. It caused losses in \nbillions to the country. Billions! We have a representative, the hon. Member of the PMSD, \nholding on to the reminiscence of the colonial era. \nThe representative in Parliament and National Assembly in 2025 is still holding on to \nthe colonial law of 1944! \n(Interruptions) \nAt least, they are consistent!  \n(Interruptions) \nBut then, what about the hon. Member of the MSM? They are holding on to this law – I \nam sure they do not know why – only because they want to satisfy the ego of the head cook! \nThat is all. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Ex-head cook! \nMr Mohamed: No! I am sure he is still cooking away! \n\n140 \n \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Nepli ena… \nThe Prime Minister: Nepli ena bartann mem! \nMr Jhummun: Ingredian inn fini! \nMr Mohamed: Look at paragraph 195, I quote – \n“Again, STC invites the Tribunal to infer, on the basis that the Government had \ntherefore ultimately agreed to a commitment that ran counter to its earlier stipulations, \nthat the CoA was an illegitimate transaction. However, it is more plausible that this \nchange was simply the product of the parties’ protracted commercial negotiations. The \nTribunal also rejects these submissions.” \nUnder the chapter of the SLO’s advice, paragraph 200 – \n“The Tribunal therefore finds that these allegations are also incapable of grounding an \ninference that there was a criminal conspiracy between Mr Bhunjun and members of \nthe then Government.” \nSo, when I read paragraph 207 – \n“In any event, these difficulties could not support an inference of criminal conspiracy.” \nFor Members out here to listen and members of the public to hear : STC, fomenté par le \ngouvernement du jour, poussé par le leader du Reform Party qui était lui-même chef de la \ncuisine, I read paragraph 211(d) – \n“(d) STC led no evidence from any person who could have given direct evidence of a \nconspiracy.” \nTherefore, based upon what hon. Members of this Opposition are telling us, let us hold \non to the laws of the colonial days? Let us not change the law! Let us simply amend it! \nAmend what? Amend this way of trying to run the affairs of the country. Based on simple \ninferences, allegations that could not even be substantiated, Madam Speaker, the tax payers \nont dû payer plus de R 6 milliards ! Qui alors va rembourser cela aux tax payers ? \nToday, we are in difficulty; and they dare come and tell us we should pay out and keep \nour promises? Today, we are having these difficulties because of such mess that has driven \nthis country to the ground!  \nParagraph 211(e), I quote – \n\n141 \n \n(e) “On a related point, in its closing submissions, STC listed a number of people who, \nit submits, have been the subject of criminal, or provisional criminal, charges \"for their \nroles in the allocation and eventual signing of the CoA\". STC did not, however, offer \nany specific allegations as to what those roles might have been, or when and how the \nconspiracy was alleged to have been entered into.’’ \nSo, back in the day, you did not manage to have any witness, any evidence and no \nsubstantiated allegations. So should the MSM be condemned for this disaster! Oh, no! They \nstand here, in the decorum of the National Assembly, saying: ‘Madam Speaker, let us not \nchange the law. Let us leave it the same.’ To answer hon. A. Duval, who allegedly thinks that \nthe hon. Prime Minister will decide one day, when he wakes up, ‘I want an inquiry.’ This is \nnot how it works! I am sorry!  \nMr A. Duval: Nothing stops him to! \nMr Mohamed: Read Section 61 of the Constitution! The hon. Prime Minister is right – \nI understand. You know, obviously, when you rub shoulders with people who behave in such \na manner, … \n(Interruptions) \nKan ou frekant lisien, ou gagn piss. You know?  \n(Interruptions) \nLet me put it in English. When you go close to the dogs which have fleas, you start itching! \nThis is what happens!  \nMr Jhummun: Karapat! \nMr Mohamed: But what I humbly suggest hon. A. Duval to do before rubbing \nshoulders with dogs infested with fleas is to take some sort of medication to get rid of the \nfleas! Do you know what is the best medication? The Constitution of Mauritius!  \nYou know what the Constitution says? There is a chapter called Cabinet if the young \nMember is not aware. Section 61(2) – \n“The functions of the Cabinet shall be to advise the President in the government of \nMauritius and (…)” \n(Interruptions) \n\n142 \n \nYou know, do not stop there! You are already drawing conclusions. Hold on! Hold your \nhorses! Get away from the dog with fleas! Hold on! \n“(…) the Cabinet shall be collectively responsible to the Assembly for any advice given \nto the President by or under the general authority of the Cabinet and for all things done \nby or under the authority of any Minister in execution of his office.” \nSo, let us not forget whatever the hon. Prime Minister will be lawfully entitled to do, \nthe Cabinet will be collectively responsible for it. Because the Constitution says he is doing \nso under the authority of his power. This is how Cabinet works! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Jhummun: …site visit pou li dan Cabinet ! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Mohamed: Back in the day, there was someone, there was a ‘so-called Prime \nMinister’ who did not believe in this type of democracy.  \n(Interruptions) \nI know he is very ill at ease right now sitting next to the MSM! I know! When I look at some \nof his questions, when I try to understand how he tries to demarcate himself… \n(Interruptions) \nDo not be afraid. Embrace the truth! This is what I say. We cannot keep on sticking to the old \ndays of 1944. Let us evolve! Young man, let us move forward! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Jhummun: Sanzman! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Mohamed: We have promised change; this is change, Madam Speaker! Change \nthere is! We have to adopt our changes. What he should do is to at least congratulate us. He \ntried to do it timidly, but please, Section 61 explains it all! \nI shall say no more. Let me say that, once again, I commend the Bill to the House. \nAn hon. Member: Bravo! \nQuestion put and agreed to. \n\n143 \n \nBill read a second time and committed. \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(Madam Speaker in the Chair) \nThe Public Inquiries Bill (No. V of 2025) was considered and agreed to. \nOn the Assembly resuming with the Madam Speaker in the Chair, Madam Speaker \nreported accordingly. \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Public Inquiries Bill (No. V of 2025) was read a \nthird time and passed. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister adjournment. \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Tuesday 13 May 2025 at 11.30 a.m. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned. We have adjournment matters. Yes \nhon. François! \nMATTERS RAISED \n(7.50 p.m.) \nRODRIGUES – SHIPPING – DEFECTIVE CONTAINERS \nMr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues): Thank you, Madam Speaker. My \nrequest is addressed to the hon. Minister responsible for shipping. It is about the many \ndefective containers sealed with tape that are used to transport products to Rodrigues such as \nanimal feed, rice, flour and other commodities. I am informed that importers consignment \ndeliveries are regularly damaged by rain and sea water without any compensation in return \ncausing a lot of loss to them.  \nIn that regard, may I humbly appeal to the hon. Minister to intervene with the Mauritius \nShipping Corporation Ltd to see with the container service provider company for urgent \nremedial measures for the replacement of these old and damaged containers as we do not \n\n144 \n \nwant to see again the episode of diri rasion pouri ou manze zamino gate to land on the market \nin Rodrigues.  \nFurther, may I request the hon. Minister to also look into the asphalting and upgrading \nof part of the muddy, dusty and untarred tarmac of a new container park depot for a \nconvenient reliable storage and handling solutions and environment at Mer Rouge. Thank \nyou. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister! \nThe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries (Dr. A. Boolell): Thank you very much, Madam Speaker. I am glad that my good friend hon. \nFrançois gave me notice of the issue that he has raised. He can rest assured that we will press \nupon the Mauritius Shipping Corporation to take corrective measures to address the situation. \nSo, he can rest assured things have been done. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes, hon. Beejan! \n(7.52 p.m.) \nGOVERNMENT SCHOOLS – SKILLING & RESKILLING PROGRAMMES \nMr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand Baie & Poudre D’or): Thank you, \nMadam Speaker. My request is addressed to the hon. Minister of Education and Human \nResource, given that there is a serious skills mismatch in Mauritius, in this spirit, will the hon. \nMinister consider running skilling and reskilling programmes in government schools after \nschool hours? Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister! \nThe Minister of Education and Human Resource (Dr. M. Gungapersad): Madam \nSpeaker, I have taken good note of the hon. Member’s request and the answer is yes. The \nhuman resource department specially the HRDC is going to look into that. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Very good news. Yes, hon. Beechook! \n(7.52 p.m.) \nSOCIAL HOUSING – INCOME THRESHOLD – INEQUALITY AMONG \nAPPLICANTS  \nMr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil): Madam Speaker, I \nhave a request to the hon. Minister of Housing and Lands concerning the social housing \n\n145 \n \nincome threshold which is currently of Rs40,000 for one applicant be it one single person or a \nfamily. So, it raises a question of inequality of fairness because very often I come up with two \nsituations whereby people who had apply some 15 to 20 years before are being called for an \ninterview today and today their income has crossed Rs40,000. Secondly, I find that the \ncurrent income threshold favours single applicants more than families because someone who \nis single and earning Rs40,000 is not equivalent to a family whereby husband and wife are \nearning Rs40,000. Thank you. \nThe Minister of Housing and Lands (Mr S. Mohamed): Madam Speaker, I believe \nthat the issue that the hon. Member raises is a very valid point. It has already been addressed \nby myself with the officers of the NHDC and the NSLD who have submitted a report and \nanalysis. It has clearly shown that there has been an increase also of income over the various \nincreases yearly, even recently in January, and therefore, it brings them out, or slightly above, \nthe Rs40,000 and then a lot of them are caught in the income trap. \nWe have made representations to the Ministry of Finance and you can rest assured that \nwe will be looking into the matter. Government will come up with a solution in the \nforthcoming days or weeks. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Dr. Prayag! \n(7.54 p.m.) \nSSRN HOSPITAL – UNUSED SPACE \nDr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart): Madam Speaker, \nmay I request the hon. Minister of Health to do a site visit at SSRN Hospital. Behind the \npharmacy, we have a huge unused space, a room which is renovated anew which can be used \nfor a transition ward for patients being discharged from the hospital. Thank you. \nThe Ministry of Health and Wellness (Mr. A. Bachoo): I will take note of his request \nand I will do the needful. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much. I think we are done. Thank you very much \neverybody. \nAt 7.55 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 13 May 2025 at \n11.30 a.m. \n \n\n146 \n \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nMAURITIUS-RODRIGUES – AIR-CONNECTIVITY – DAILY & \nSUPPLEMENTARY FLIGHTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/439",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 439,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Ms Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/439) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the \nMinister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the post of Midwife in public health \ninstitutions, he will state the number thereof recruited over the past ten years in Mauritius and \nRodrigues, indicating the – \n(a) \nnumber thereof promoted to the grade of Senior Midwife, and \n(b) \neligibility criteria to be considered for promotion therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \n\n152 \n \nILLEGALLY CONSTRUCTED MORCELLEMENT UNITS – 2015-2024 – POLICE \nCASES – SUPPORT MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/440",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 440,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/440) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to illegally constructed \nmorcellement units since 2015 to 2024, he will state the number thereof, indicating the – \n(a) \nnumber of cases referred to the Police, and  \n(b) \nmeasures being envisaged to support the victims thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: In March 2019, several suspected cases of forgery in the issue of morcellement \npermits were detected at the level of the Morcellement Unit of my Ministry. The matter was \nreferred to the Commissioner of Police and to the then Director of the Independent \nCommission Against Corruption. Subsequently, an officer posted at the Morcellement Unit, \nallegedly involved in the issuance of several fake morcellement permits, was interdicted from \nservice on 09 May 2019. As at date investigations are still ongoing at the level of the Police \nand the Financial Crime Commission.  \nWith regard to part (b), I wish to inform the House that these illegally constructed \nMorcellement are affecting around 300 landowners, who, through no fault of their own, are \nunable to either dispose of or develop their respective plots of land. My Ministry is fully \naware of the hardship being faced by these landowners and is determined to find a fair and \npractical solution. In this context, my Ministry is inviting the developers involved in these \nMorcellement without a proper morcellement permit to submit fresh applications and/or \neffect payment of the applicable Morcellement fees, provided that the requirements of the \nMorcellement Act are duly met. \nThis approach will allow for the provision of proper infrastructure and utilities such as \ndrains, electricity, and water supply within these Morcellement. It will also enable \nlandowners to legally develop their plots, subject to compliance with all relevant legislative \nrequirements. \nJEUX INTER COLLÈGES – RE-ESTABLISHMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/441",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 441,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/441) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Jeux Inter collèges, he will state \nthe actions being taken by the Ministry and the Mauritius Secondary Schools Sports \nAssociation to re-establish the holding thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n\n153 \n \n \nSINGAPORE MISSION – POTENTIAL COLLABORATION AVENUES – \nOUTCOME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/442",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 442,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/442) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Attorney-\nGeneral whether, in regard to his recent mission undertaken to Singapore to discuss avenues \nof potential collaboration on judicial reform, anti-financial crime measures and prosecutorial \ncooperation, as proposed in the Government Programme 2025-2029, he will state the \noutcome thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nRIVIÈRE DU REMPART – ROHIT BOOLAKY STADIUM – NATURE OF \nWORKS & COSTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/443",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 443,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/443) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Rohit Boolaky Stadium at \nRivière du Rempart, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(i) \nthe nature of works being carried out thereat, indicating the costs thereof, \nand  \n(ii) \nwhen the football ground will be reopened to the public, and  \n(b) \nstate if consideration will be given for the demolition of the surrounding walls \nthereof with a view to enlarging the roads adjoining same.",
      "answer": "Reply: In response to the hon. Member’s question regarding the Rohit Boolaky \nStadium at Rivière du Rempart, I wish to inform the House that I personally conducted a site \nvisit to the stadium recently. I was accompanied by hon. Ministers Raj Pentiah and Dr. \nKaviraj Sukon, as well as hon. MP Nitin Prayag. During this visit, several concerns were \nraised by these honourable Members relating to the safety, accessibility, and long-term \ndevelopment of the facility.  \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, concerning the nature of the works and the \nestimated costs, I am advised that, as a precautionary measure, the Council temporarily \nclosed the stadium and resolved to carry out essential repairs in phases due to limited \nfinancial resources. The first phase of works includes the following –  \n\n154 \n \n• \nDemolition, removal, and reconstruction of the damaged coping along the entire \nboundary perimeter; \n• \nReinstatement of the lighting system around the football ground;  \n• \nCompletion of electrical wiring and fittings, and  \n• \nMinor upgrades to the public toilets.  \nThe estimated cost for these works is Rs 1 million. A tender has been launched today \nfor all works, excluding the toilet upgrades, which will be undertaken by the Council through \nin-house labour. The works are expected to last approximately 60 days, during which the \nstadium will remain closed. However, limited access for jogging may be allowed temporarily \nin response to public requests.  \nWith regard to part (b), concerning the reopening of the stadium, the exact date will \ndepend on the timely completion and handover of the works by the contractor. My Ministry is \nmaking every effort to ensure that the stadium becomes safe and accessible to the public as \nsoon as possible.  \nConcerning part (c) of the question, discussion was held on the weakening of the \nreinforced concrete coping along the boundary wall, which the District Council identified as a \nsafety risk to users of the football ground.  \nThis issue is an important priority and is part of a wider plan to urgently repair and \nimprove the stadium’s infrastructure. The proposed measure also aims to improve access for \nemergency vehicles such as ambulances and fire trucks, directly responding to public \nconcerns about restricted entry during emergencies. \nAdditionally, replacing the solid wall with open fencing will enhance visibility and \nsurveillance over the football ground and surrounding areas, helping to deter illicit activities, \nincluding suspected drug-related incidents reported by local residents.  \nI assure the House that my Ministry will continue to work closely with the District \nCouncil to ensure that the Rohit Boolaky Stadium is restored to a safe and fully functional \nfacility for the benefit of the local community.  \nIn this context, the District Council has submitted a funding request of Rs15 million for \nthe demolition of the existing boundary wall and its replacement with open fencing. \nHowever, it is important to note that the proposed developments are subject to the availability \nof funds and prevailing budgetary priorities. \n \n\n155 \n \nRODRIGUES – ANTOINETTE PRUDENCE STE FAMILLE RCEA, LATANIER – \nMINI SOCCER SYNTHETIC PITCH CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/444",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 444,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/444) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nNational Infrastructure whether, in regard to the proposed construction of a mini soccer \nsynthetic pitch at Antoinette Prudence Ste Famille RCEA at Latanier in Rodrigues by the \nNational Development Unit, he will state, if the consultancy stage therefor has been \ncompleted and, if so, indicate the – \n(a) \nmain recommendations thereof, and  \n(b) \nexpected start and completion dates thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: With regard to the construction of a mini soccer synthetic pitch at Antoinette \nPrudence Ste Famille RCEA at Latanier in Rodrigues, the authorisation of the Roman \nCatholic Education Authority (RCEA) for its implementation has already been secured and a \nsite visit was effected to inspect the proposed site and evaluate the feasibility of the project. \nThe project was initially estimated to cost Rs12 million comprising Rs2 million for \nconsultancy services.  \nA first bidding exercise for the appointment of a consultant was launched on 03 July \n2024 with closing date of 29 August 2024. However, the price quoted by the 2 bidders were \n184% and 57.8% higher than the cost estimates and the bidding exercise had to be cancelled. \nA new bidding exercise with updated cost estimates was launched on 02 February 2025 \nand same is currently at evaluation stage. The contract for consultancy services is expected to \nbe awarded by June 2025. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, works are expected to start during the next \nfinancial year for a duration of 12 months. \n \nOLIVIA NHDC – STREET LIGHTING – RESTORATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/445",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 445,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/445) Mr R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to street lighting at Olivia \nNHDC, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the District Council of Flacq, \ninformation as to when same will be restored in view of the safety and security concerns \nexpressed by the residents.  \n\n156",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nLAND DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN – PUBLICATION PROPOSAL",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/446",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 446,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/446) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the Land \nDrainage Master Plan, he will state where matters stand as to the proposition to making the \ndocument public.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nLA NICOLIÈRE RESERVOIR – WATER LEVEL – IRRIGATION USE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/447",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 447,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/447) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to La Nicolière Reservoir, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the current recorded water level \nthereof, indicating when water for irrigation purposes will be made available to planters on a \nregular basis.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Water Resources Commission that the level of La \nNicolière Reservoir as at 05 May 2025 stood at 100%.  \nLa Nicolière Reservoir is among one of our small reservoirs and is supplemented by \nMidlands Dam through the La Nicolière Feeder Canal.  The levels of La Nicolière Reservoir \nhad been consistently low over the past several months due to severe deficiency in rainfall.  \nThe main reason for its current replenishment is the near normal rainfall over the island \nduring period March/April 2025. \nAs regards water for irrigation purposes, I wish to inform the House that despite the dry \nspell which has been prevailing over the country, my Ministry has maintained provision of \nwater to planters for irrigation of crops and vegetables.  In view of the improved level of the \nreservoir after the recent rainfalls, the outflow from La Nicolière Reservoir to the Irrigation \nAuthority has increased from 20,000 m3/day to 43,000 m3/day to support agricultural \nactivities.  As such, as from 21 April 2025, the frequency of irrigation for vegetables and \ncrops has increased from two to three days per week. \nIt is important for me to recall to the House that according to the Mauritius \nMeteorological Services, the island has witnessed a severe deficit in rainfall since July 2024 \nto date.  Unlike previous years, we have not received summer rains during this summer \n\n157 \n \nseason, which are meant to replenish our reservoirs.  At the same time last year, our total \nreservoirs level had stood at 93% compared to 63.7% today.   \nWe are awaiting the official publication of the Winter 2025 Outlook from the Mauritius \nMeteorological Services regarding expected rainfall between May to October 2025. \nThe Water Resources Monitoring Committee which comprises among others, \nrepresentatives of my Ministry, the Central Water Authority and Irrigation Authority, is \ncontinuing to monitor the water situation closely and decisions as appropriate will be taken in \ndue course. \nIt remains pertinent to ensure a judicious management of our scarce resources. \n \n59TH SADC TNF & RETREAT– TARIFF REDUCTION – STRATEGY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/448",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 448,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade",
      "question": "(No. B/448) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade whether, \nin regard to the 59th SADC Trade Negotiating Forum (SADC TNF) and TNF Retreat, \nscheduled to be held from 05 to 09 May 2025 in Mauritius, he will state the strategy of \nGovernment in relation to the policy of tariff reduction among SADC member States and the \nAfrican Union.",
      "answer": "Reply: The SADC Free Trade Area (FTA) was launched on 17 August 2008 pursuant \nto which SADC Member States eliminated tariffs on 85% of intra-SADC trade. Tariffs on the \nremaining 15% of intra-SADC trade, which concerned products deemed sensitive, were \naccorded a longer liberalisation time-frame up to 2012. Mauritius requested further time for \nthe elimination of tariffs on the sensitive products due to economic challenges faced at that \ntime resulting from the global financial crisis. By January 2014, Mauritius completed its tariff \nliberalisation under the SADC Protocol on Trade. \nSince the accession of Mauritius to the SADC FTA, there has been a constant \nprogression in trade with the SADC Member States. Exports to the SADC region from \nMauritius stood at Rs11.9 billion in 2013 and reached Rs19.5 billion in 2024, showing an \nincrease of 63.9%. Imports on its part grew from Rs14.2 billion in 2013 to Rs31.1 billion in \n2024. \nThe SADC Trade Negotiating Forum and Retreat scheduled from 05 to 09 May 2025 in \nMauritius will focus on the implementation and consolidation of the SADC FTA. The SADC \nTNF will be held from 07 to 09 May 2025 and is preceded by the SADC TNF Retreat from \n\n158 \n \n05 to 06 May 2025. It may be highlighted that the SADC TNF Retreat is a first of its kind \nconvened by the SADC Secretariat.  \nThe TNF is a critical platform, established under the SADC framework, for SADC \nMember States to discuss and negotiate trade-related matters within the SADC region. I wish \nto emphasise that the TNF is not mandated to discuss tariff reduction and trade-related \nmatters relating to the African Union (AU). \nMauritius is represented in the SADC TNF and Retreat by Mrs Minakshi Dabee-\nHauzaree, Director, Co-operation and Mrs. F. Pokun, Acting Principal Trade Policy Analyst, \nfrom my Ministry.  \nIt may be noted that tariff liberalisation under the AU is negotiated under the African \nContinental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) framework, which aims to create a single continent-\nwide market for goods and services, promoting trade and investment within Africa.  \nThe AfCFTA adopted a phased approach to tariff liberalisation whereby Member States \nhave committed to start implementation of tariff reduction on at least 90% of tariff lines upon \nentry into force of the Agreement, in 2021. Mauritius had submitted its tariff phase down \nschedule covering 90% of tariff lines for immediate liberalisation in 2021. \nThe remaining 10% of tariff lines will be subject to negotiation, comprising 7% \nsensitive products and 3% to be excluded from tariff liberalisation.  \n \nBEAU SEJOUR COMMUNITY CENTRE – RENOVATION PROJECT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/449",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 449,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/449) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the Beau \nSejour Community Centre, she will state if any project for the renovation thereof, including \nits yard, is being envisaged and, if so, give details thereof and if not, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nFSC – ISSUED LICENCES –APPLICATIONS RECEIVED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/450",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 450,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/450) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the \nlicences issued by the Financial Services Commission, she will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain therefrom information as to the number of applications therefor received over the past \nthree years, indicating in each case the – \n(a) time taken for the processing thereof, and  \n(b) outcome thereof. \n\n159",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUES – NATIONAL & INTERNATIONAL FOOTBALL TOURNAMENTS – \nSELECTION CRITERIA – SUPPORT & FACILITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/451",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 451,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/451) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nYouth and Sports whether, in regard to national and international football tournaments, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the criteria used for the selection of \nyoung footballers from Rodrigues Island to participate therein, indicating the support and \nfacilities extended to the selected players and table copy thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: Rodrigues holds a special place in our hearts and is recognised for its reservoir \nof sporting talent. For this reason, whenever a national selection is made, regardless of the \nsports discipline, talent identification exercises are systematically conducted in Rodrigues, as \nwas the case for the Commission de la Jeunesse et des Sports de l’Ocean Indien Games. \nI am informed by the Mauritius Football Association that two coaches were dispatched \nto Rodrigues on 12 and 13 April 2025 to scout promising young players with the potential to \nbe included in the national squad. \nI wish to inform the House that Section 6 (1) (h) of the Sports Act 2016 provides that it \nis the responsibility of a National Sports Federation to select the most deserving athletes to \nrepresent Mauritius in international competitions on the recommendations of its National \nTechnical Director, National Coach or selection committee, as the case may be.   \nI am informed that players from Rodrigues who are selected to join national squads \nbenefit from support and facilities, including – \na. \nreturn airfares; \nb. \nfull-board hotel accommodation in Mauritius, where applicable;  \nc. \nprovision of training and match equipment; \nd. \nlight meals provided during training sessions in Mauritius, and \ne. \nlocal transportation for training sessions and airport transfer. \nThese measures aim at ensuring that athletes from Rodrigues are given equal \nopportunities to thrive and contribute to the performance of the national squad. \n \n\n160 \n \nNLTA – HEAD OFFICE – PROPOSED RELOCATION – UPDATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/452",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 452,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/452) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the proposed relocation \nof the Head Office of the National Land Transport Authority, he will state where matters \nstand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \nALMA, DAGOTIÈRE, L’AVENIR REGIONS – WATER SUPPLY – NEW \nBOREHOLES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/453",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 453,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/453) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to water supply in Alma, \nDagotière, L’Avenir and surrounding regions, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Central Water Authority, information as to whether consideration will be given for \nthe drilling of new boreholes to service these regions and, if so, when and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nBAIE DU TOMBEAU – ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS – ROADS \nCONCERNED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/454",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 454,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/454) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to road infrastructure works being \ncarried out at Baie du Tombeau, he will state when resurfacing and/or asphalting works will \nbe carried out on the different roads in the region thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Road Development Authority (RDA) that, in the region of \nBaie du Tombeau, the following roads fall under its purview, namely – \n(i) \nThe Riche Terre (B33) Road, and \n(ii) \nThe Baie du Tombeau (B29) Road. \nI am further informed that the B33 Road, from its junction with the Motorway M2 at \nthe Riche-Terre roundabout, is in a good condition except for localised settlements due to \nhouse connections for water supply.  \nAs regards the Baie du Tombeau (B29) Road, I am informed that the stretch from \nCocoterie Roundabout to the junction with Riche Terre Road B33 is in a good condition. \nHowever, the stretch of the B29 Road from its junction with B33 Road near Cocotier Hotel to \nChateau des Reves is in a deplorable state.  The RDA has already issued a Works Order on \n\n161 \n \n21 March 2025 for an amount of Rs4.86 m., inclusive of VAT, for resurfacing works over an \napproximate length of 700 metres thereat. The works are expected to start by the second week \nof May 2025 and will be completed by end of May 2025.  \nAs regards the stretch of the Baie du Tombeau (B29) Road from Port Chambly football \nground up to its junction with the Terre Rouge-Triolet-Grand Baie (A4) Road at St Joseph, I \nam informed that the RDA had, in March 2024, granted wayleave to the Wastewater \nManagement Authority (WMA) for pipelaying works over a length of 1.1 km, subject to full \nwidth reinstatement after completion of the works. I am informed that the temporary trench \nreinstatement, recently been completed thereat, have settled.  The RDA is closely monitoring \nthe situation and liaising with the WMA for the required remedial works.   \nIn addition, I am informed that the National Development Unit is currently undertaking \nseveral road works in the region of Baie du Tombeau, namely – \n(i) \nResurfacing of Avenue Rouget, Baie du Tombeau; \n(ii) \nReinstatement of Avenue Pingouin, Baie du Tombeau, and \n(iii) Reinstatement of Avenue des Capucines, Morcellement Beau Rivage, Baie du \nTombeau. \nThe first two projects are expected to be completed by mid-May 2025 and the third \nproject will be completed by mid-June 2025 in view of CWA pipe relocation works. \n \nGOVERNMENT BUILDINGS – RAIN WATER HARVESTING SYSTEMS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/455",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 455,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/455) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to Government \nbuildings, he will state if consideration will be given for the provision of rain water \nharvesting systems thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nIRRIGATION AUTHORITY – EMPLOYEES – ALLEGED INTRUSION TO \nPRIVACY COMPLAINTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/456",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 456,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Ms Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/456) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nwhether, in regard to the Irrigation Authority, he will state if he has been aware of complaints \nmade on the alleged intrusion to the privacy of the employees thereof, indicating the \nmeasures being envisaged in relation thereto. \n\n162",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nBEL AIR – TRAFFIC CONGESTION – SURVEY – REMEDIAL ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/457",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 457,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/457) Mr R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the road traffic congestion issues \nbeing faced by road users in the village of Bel Air, he will state if a survey has been \nconducted thereon and, if so, indicate the – \n(a)  findings thereof, and  \n(b)  remedial actions being proposed therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCAMP THOREL – DRAIN PROJECT – WORK & COST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/458",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 458,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/458) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the cut-off drain project \nphase 2B being implemented by the Drain Infrastructure Constructions Ltd., at Camp Thorel, \nhe will state where matters stand, indicating – \n(a)  the scope of work and cost thereof;  \n(b)  if access to private land were sought from and granted by the respective land \nowners prior to the implementation thereof and, if not, the reasons therefor, and  \n(c)  the expected completion date thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSMALL SUGAR CANE PLANTERS – CULTIVATION & HARVESTING – \nFACILITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/459",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 459,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/459) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard \nto small sugar cane planters, he will state the schemes, facilities and access to mechanized \nsolutions being extended thereto for the cultivation of fields and the harvesting of crops.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n\n163 \n \nCOMMUNITIES CENTRES & SOCIAL WELFARE CENTRES – COMMITTEES –\nCHAIRPERSONS & MEMBERS ELECTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/460",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 460,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Ms Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/460) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to \nCommunities Centres and Social Welfare Centres, she will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Sugar Industry Labour Welfare Fund, information as to the – \n(a)  number thereof, and  \n(b)  procedures established for the election of Chairpersons and members of the \ncommittees thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIAN EMBASSIES & HIGH COMMISSIONS – VEHICLES PURCHASED \n(2015-2024)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/461",
      "sitting_id": "06-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-06",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 461,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade",
      "question": "(No. B/461) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade \nwhether, in regard to the Mauritian Embassies and High Commissions abroad, he will, in \neach case, provide a list of the vehicles purchased over the period 2015 to 2024, indicating \nthe – \n(a) \nmission concerned therewith; \n(b) \ncost thereof, and \n(c) \npurpose therefor.",
      "answer": "Reply: The Ministry is supported by 19 Diplomatic Missions overseas under the \nstewardship of an Ambassador/High Commissioner and two Consulates.  \nThe Ambassador/High Commissioner, either a career officer or political appointee on \ncontract, is the Head of Mission and is responsible for engaging with the relevant authorities \nin the country of accreditation and the smooth running of the Mission.  \nAs per the contract of Ambassadors, they are eligible for an official car put at their \ndisposal in the country of posting.  \nAs regards information pertaining to parts (a) and (b) respectively, the list of missions \nconcerned and the costs involved is being placed in the Library of the National Assembly. \nWith regard to part (c) of the question, I wish to inform the House that our Missions \navail of two categories of vehicles, namely – \n\n164 \n \n(i) \nRepresentational \nCar \nwhich \nis \nmainly \nused \nby Ambassadors/High \nCommissioners and Permanent Representative for attending functions/ meetings \nas well as personal use, and \n(ii) \nService Car which is being used for the daily activities of the mission such as \ndispatch of correspondences, conveyance of staff to attend meetings/functions.",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-06-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/462",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 462,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/462) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to agricultural lands owned by the Mauritius Investment Corporation Ltd., in \nConstituency No. 13, Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe extent and location thereof in each case, and  \n(b) \nwhether they will be leased and/or put at the disposal of farmers, prospective \nfarmers and SMEs of the region, indicating the procedure to be followed therefor.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, as regards part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed by the Bank of Mauritius that the Mauritius Investment Corporation Ltd (MIC) has \nacquired from Omnicane three plots of land of a total of 172 acres in Constituency No. 13 – \nRivière des Anguilles and Souillac, which was the constituency of the previous Minister of \nFinance. \n\n18 \n \nThe extent and location of each plot of land are as follows – \n• 38.4 acres at Riche Bois; \n• 61.0 acres at Britannia, and \n• 72.6 acres at Tyack. \nA management contract was entered between the MIC and Omnicane for the latter to \nplant and harvest sugarcane, to process into cane sugar and other co-products, as well as in \nthe management of sugarcane fields, that is, in between harvesting and during harvesting \nagainst a small fee paid to the MIC. \nMadam Speaker, concerning part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that in \nview of the ramifications regarding the portfolio of the MIC, the Bank of Mauritius is \ncurrently examining different options for the restructuring of the MIC, including the optimal \nuse of land assets acquired under very dubious conditions for more than Rs10 billion from \nMedine Sugar Estate and Omnicane.   \nFurthermore, looking at the price paid for the plots of land purchased by the MIC in \nvarious locations, this will be submitted to the Government Valuer for the latter to ascertain \nwhether it was value for money. \nMadam Speaker: Mr Jhummun!  \nMr Jhummun: Thank you, Madam Speaker. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Too many things happening at the same time! Please! \nMr Jhummun: Etant un vrai démocrate, I know that the hon. Prime Minister will \ninform the House about the information contained in the management contract; whether it has \nbeen done in such a way that it favours the MIC or it is one-sided, favouring only the \ncompanies? Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Prime Minister! \nThe Prime Minister: We will certainly look into that, including the valuation of the \nplots of lands.  \n\n19 \n \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \nCIVIL STATUS SUB-OFFICE, TERRE ROUGE – DEPLORABLE STATE – \nREMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/463",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 463,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/463) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Civil Status Office situated at Le Hochet, Terre Rouge, he will state if his Office \nis in presence of any representation from the inhabitants of the region as to the deplorable \nstate of the building and, if so, indicate the urgent remedial measures being envisaged \nthereon.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed that there have been several \nverbal and written complaints regarding the deplorable state of the Terre Rouge Civil Status \nsub-office situated at Le Hochet. \nThe Safety and Health Section of the Ministry of Public Service and Administrative \nReforms has also highlighted the poor state of the building and had made specific \nrecommendations to improve the working environment thereof. The hon. Member himself \nmade a surprise visit, I believe, and he saw for himself. \nThe Civil Status Division had on several occasions requested the lessor to undertake the \nnecessary renovations. Unfortunately, no action was taken by the lessor. Consequently, two \ntender exercises were launched by the Civil Status Division in 2018 and 2021, respectively, to \nidentify alternative premises that comply with safety and health standards and are \nstrategically located near key facilities such as the police station, post office, bus stop, etc., to \nensure accessibility to the public. However, both exercises were unsuccessful. \nSubsequently, the Civil Status Division has conducted several site visits in the region to \nidentify a suitable location for the sub-office. An office space located within the Terre Rouge \nVillage Council Multi-Purpose Complex has now been found to be suitable for that purpose. \nAn agreement has been reached with the Pamplemousses District Council for the allocation \nof the office space and the Council is now renovating the building. \nIt is expected that the sub-office will be able to move to the new premises by August of \nthis year. \n\n20 \n \nMadam Speaker: Yes. You are happy? \nMr Caserne: Yes. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac, \nagain! \nMR N. B. – FORMER DIRECTOR GENERAL ICAC & FCC – 2019 LONDON \nMISSION – BOARD’S APPROVAL",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-13-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/464",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 464,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/464) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Mr N.B., former Director General of the Independent Commission against \nCorruption (ICAC) and the Financial Crimes Commission, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to whether the approval of the Board of the ICAC was sought \nand obtained prior to his travel to London in 2019 to attend the Privy Council hearing in the \nMedPoint case, indicating the cost incurred therefor.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Financial Crimes \nCommission that Mr Navin Beekarry, former Director General of the Independent \nCommission Against Corruption, proceeded to London on three occasions in connection with \nthe hearing of the Privy Council for the MedPoint case. In 2018, Mr Beekarry proceeded \ntwice to London from 28 September to 07 October and from 21 to 28 November. As for 2019, \nhe travelled to London from the 12 to 20 January.  \nThese missions were approved by the Board of the then ICAC, which Board was \nchaired by Mr Beekarry himself. So, in accordance with section 19(3)(b) of the repealed \nPrevention of Corruption Act, he did not recuse himself, I must say, and when the decision on \nhis mission was being discussed and subsequently approved by the Board, he was present \nthere. This is a blatant case of conflict of interest.  \nWhat was equally contemptible was his presence at the Privy Council despite the fact \nthat the Privy Council, through correspondence dated 13 December 2018, Lord Kerr directed \nthat ICAC’s application to make oral submission be refused. He was not given permission. In \nspite of that, he proceeded on mission to London, accompanied by Mr Roopchand, Acting \nChief Legal Adviser and Mr Sohawon, Attorney at Law.  \n\n21 \n \nMadam Speaker, what should also be recalled is that Mr Navin Beekarry changed his \noriginal stand, which was in favour of prosecution in the MedPoint case. He changed his \nopinion a few days before the sitting of the Privy Council. \nThe total costs, Madam Speaker, of the missions undertaken by Mr Beekarry, Mr \nRoopchand and Mr Sohawon for the hearing of the Privy Council in connection with the \nMedPoint case amounted to Rs1,373,990.02 – for a mission that the Privy Council said that \nthey will not be able to do oral submissions. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, now it is hon. Second Member for Grand’Baie and Poudre \nd'Or! \nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD – HEAD OFFICE BUILDING – LEASE \nAGREEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/465",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 465,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/465) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nEconomic Development Board, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom \ninformation as to when was the Head Office thereof shifted to Ebene, indicating the – \n(a)  name of the owner of the building housing same;  \n(b)  amount of rent paid therefor to date, and  \n(c)  conditions of the lease agreement and table copy thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Member for asking this \nquestion. \nThis is yet – every week we see this – another example of cronies of the previous \ngovernment benefitting from contracts awarded by public bodies.  \nI am informed by the Economic Development Board (EDB) that its head office shifted \nto the 7 Exchange Square Building in Ebene in December 2022.  Now, a tender exercise was \nlaunched in October 2018 even before the building was constructed. The tender exercise was \nstarted as if they knew the building would be there. All the other bidders in the tender \nexercise were found to be non-responsive and only PSH Investment Ltd was qualified and \nawarded the contract.   \n\n22 \n \nAs regards part (a) of the question, the EDB signed a lease agreement with PSH \nInvestment Ltd, which is the owner of the building, on 09 August 2019 for 5,000 square \nmetres of office space and 130 parking slots. As per the lease agreement signed, the building \nwas to be delivered in December 2020 and rent payable from February 2021, but the office \nspace was actually delivered in October 2022, that is, a delay of almost 2 years. \nOn 30 May 2024, the EDB signed a second lease agreement with PSH Investment Ltd \nfor an additional office space of 170 square metres at the ground floor of the same building \nand also for 2 additional parking slots. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the Corporate and Business Registration \nDepartment that PSH Investment Ltd is fully owned by NG Holdings Ltd and the sole \nshareholder of NG Holdings Ltd is Mr Vinash Gopee. \nConcerning part (b) of the question, the EDB started paying rent for the office building \nas from December 2022 when it started occupying the building.  \nThe total amount of rent paid by EDB from December 2022 to date is Rs104.9 million. \nIn addition, an amount of Rs7.2 million has been paid for syndic fees. \nRegarding part (c) of the question, the House may wish to note that the main conditions \nof the lease agreements are as follows – \n(i) \nthe minimum lease period for the first lease agreement is 10 years and for the \nsecond lease agreement, it is 8 years and 6 months; \n(ii) \nthe monthly rental is Rs625, exclusive of VAT, per square metre for the first lease \nagreement and Rs1,147 per square meter for the second lease agreement. In other \nwords, the prices have jumped; \n(iii) as from December 2027, the rental must be reviewed every 2 years based on the \nincrease in the Consumer Price Index; \n(iv) up to November 2027, the contract may be terminated by giving 4 months’ notice, \nbut the EDB must pay the rental from the date of cancellation up to the expiry of \nthe initial lease period; and \n(v) \nafter November 2027, the contract may be terminated by giving 4 months’ notice \nand the EDB will then not be required to pay any further rental.  \n\n23 \n \nI am tabling a copy of the two lease agreements. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix! \nWAKASHIO SHIPWRECK – INSURANCE COMPENSATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/466",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 466,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/466) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nWakashio shipwreck, he will state the amount of insurance compensation paid to Government \nto date, indicating the quantum thereof paid, if any, to the persons and/or entities who had \nsustained loss or damage as a consequence thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMRA – CONTRIBUTION SOCIALE GÉNÉRALISÉE – FUNDS COLLECTED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/467",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 467,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/467) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Contribution \nSociale Généralisée, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Revenue \nAuthority, information as to the amount of funds collected yearly since its introduction to \ndate, giving a breakdown thereof and indicating the – \n(a)  quantum thereof already spent, if any and for what purpose, and  \n(b)  remaining balance thereof to date.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the Contribution Sociale Généralisée (CSG) \nwas introduced in September 2020 and the contributions to the National Pensions Fund were \naccordingly abolished.  \nThe CSG was introduced by way of regulations and subsequently, the Social \nContribution and Social Benefits Act was enacted in 2021 to provide for the levy of CSG and \npayment of the benefits.   \nThe rates of CSG contribution in respect of an employee earning up to Rs50,000 in a \nmonth are 1.5% and 3% of basic salary for the employee and his employer, respectively. As \nregards an employee earning above Rs50,000 a month, the rates of contribution are 3% and \n6%.  \n\n24 \n \nI am informed by the Mauritius Revenue Authority that since September 2020 to the \nend of April 2025, a total amount of Rs44.6 billion has been collected as CSG contributions \nand remitted to the Consolidated Fund. \nThe yearly breakdown is as follows – \n(a) \nRs5.25 billion in financial year 2020/2021; \n(b) \nRs8.35 billion in financial year 2021/2022; \n(c) \nRs9.51 billion in financial year 2022/2023; \n(d) \nRs10.9 billion in financial year 2023/2024, and  \n(e) \nRs10.6 billion in the current financial year, as at April 2025.  \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, a number of benefits are being paid for various \nschemes and measures under the Social Contribution and Social Benefits Act. For the period \n2021 to end of April 2025, a total amount of Rs34 billion has been spent under these schemes \nand measures. \nIn addition, a total amount of Rs10.7 billion has been paid for allowance to public \nsector employees as well as meeting government contributions to the CSG. \nMadam Speaker, as far as part (b) of the question is concerned, from a budgeting point \nof view, there is no remaining balance as at end April 2025.  \nLet me remind the House of the reply to PQ B/1248 on 24 October 2023, the previous \nMinister of Finance said, and I quote – \n« Il ne reste donc rien par rapport aux contributions de la CSG. »  \nAt that very time itself, they had already depleted all the funds from the CSG. \nMadam Speaker, I am tabling a breakdown of funds collected and spent as at the end of \nApril 2025. \nIt must be noted that the previous government had engaged in the provision of a series \nof allowances from funds coming from the CSG, especially during the months preceding the \nlast elections in a clear attempt to lure the voters. \nThis is yet another example of how the CSG funds had been dilapidated by the previous \nregime in their desperation to try to win the elections. \nAn hon. Member: Voler! \n\n25 \n \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Beechook! \nMr Beechook: Madam Speaker, we all know that the CSG system is what has \ndestroyed the French social security system. Given the fact that Mauritius has an ageing \npopulation, has there been any study to understand till which date the current system is a \nsustainable one? \nThe Prime Minister: Even before a study is carried out, we know it is going to be \ndisastrous because, as you say, we have an ageing population. We are looking at all this in the \ncontext of the budget.  \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Lobine, is that okay? \nThe Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue, hon. A. Duval! \nSAFE CITY CAMERAS – DATA PROTECTION ACT PURVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-13-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/468",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 468,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/468) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Safe City cameras, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to whether consideration will be given for the \noperation thereof to be placed under the purview of the Data Protection Act and, if so, when \nand, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that the Safe City \nProject came into operation on 19 August 2019, and is operating under the provisions of the \nData Protection Act, which is in line with the European Union General Data Protection \nRegulation requirements.  \nPrior to the implementation of the Safe City project, a certificate was issued, under \nSection 44(4) of the Data Protection Act, exempting the Mauritius Police Force from the \napplication of certain sections of the Data Protection Act, in the interest of national and \npublic security. These Sections pertain, among others, to the collection, access and \ncommunication of personal data.  \nOn 10 November 2020, the Mauritius Police Force has been registered as a Data \nController by the Data Protection Office. On August 2023, the Registration certificate has \nbeen renewed up to July 2026.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \n\n26 \n \nMr A. Duval: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Madam Speaker, can the hon. Prime \nMinister confirm that under the exceptions which apply to the Safe City Project, no sanctions \ncan be taken by the Data Protection Office for contraventions being done at the level of \nMauritius Police Force, if there are any? \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the right of privacy is guaranteed by our \nConstitution. This is not an absolute right, but the same Article also provides for exceptions \nin the interest of public safety and security. So, the Constitution already gives the right of \nprivacy, which is guaranteed. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, can I … \nMadam Speaker: No! No! If I may. I think the question was that the Data Protection \nCommissioner could not prosecute. Is that your question? \nMr A. Duval: Yes, Madam Speaker! \nMadam Speaker: Your question was that the Data Protection Commissioner cannot \nprosecute. I would… \nMr A. Duval: If I may have another question. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Go with another question! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, the hon. Prime Minister will agree that a project like \nthe Safe City Cameras, operating in a legal vacuum, involves huge risks with regard to the \nsafeguard of personal data and risk of abuses. The hon. Prime Minister has himself \ncomplained in the past of safe city cameras being positioned in front of his office – which \nhave now been removed – specifically for espionage, and not for the legitimate detection of \ncrime. This is the reason why there is a need for a specific legislation. \nMadam Speaker: No, no! Question! Question! Rephrase it! \nMr A. Duval: Will the hon. Prime Minister agree that there is a need for a specific \nlegislation which provides for accountability and for sanctions and prosecutions of offenders \nof the controllers and the users? We have seen in the past how …  \n(Interruptions) \n… we have seen in the past the risk of abuses… \nMadam Speaker: Don’t make statements! \n\n27 \n \nMr A. Duval: So, will he not agree… \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Every time I tell you to put a question. Put a question, not a \nstatement! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Stop helping him! \nThe Prime Minister: Let me remind the hon. Member – you joined government – the \nSafe City Cameras came into operation on 19 August 2019! I didn’t hear you say anything \nthen!  \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: We did not …  \nThe Prime Minister: You didn’t?  \nMr A. Duval: I… \nThe Prime Minister: Still, you accepted the post! You became the Deputy Speaker! \n(Interruptions) \nBut, in any case, … \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Wait for the answer! \nThe Prime Minister: … I said it very clearly in the House that there is no espionage \nbeing done now! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, if I may. \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Pena mem nanien pou espione ar twa! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Okay, your last supplementary question! But question, not \nstatement! \n\n28 \n \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, in May 2019, there was a Private Notice Question \nspecifically on the need to have a specific legislation as the Safe City Cameras operate \noutside the purview of the Data Protection Act because of the Certificate of Exemption. \nTherefore, the Data Protection Commissioner cannot take any sanctions. There is only a Code \nof Conduct…  \nThe Prime Minister: That is not an issue! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Again, you are … \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: So, this issue was raised as far back in 2019. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Al lekol primer do! \nMs Anquetil: Il n’y a pas de question ! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: So, it is not right to say it has not… \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. A. Duval, I asked you specifically not to make a statement. It’s \na second statement that you are making! \nMr A. Duval: Alright! I will put the question! \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: Does the Prime Minister not think anymore … \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Ey assize! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: … that there is a risk of espionage and misuse of data collected by the \nSafe City Cameras? \n(Interruptions) \n\n29 \n \nDoes he not think that anymore? \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister! \nThe Prime Minister: The hon. Member’s father first had asked the PNQ in May 2019 \nwhen he was in the Opposition, but he joined the government afterwards. He did not do \nanything then! Then, everything was okay! Everything was fine!  \n(Interruptions) \nYou didn’t? \n(Interruptions) \nMr Jhummun: Par limpost! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: Didn’t you sit in the Chair? \nMr Jhummun: Pass par limpost ! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: Nothing happened then! Then everything was okay! \n(Interruptions) \nNow, you are asking me the question when I have stopped the espionage… \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Let the hon. Prime Minister speak, please! \nThe Prime Minister: … of individuals in this country! \nMadam Speaker: That was the last question! That was your last question! \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien!  \nVIPSU OFFICERS – PROMOTION – PERIOD 2015-2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/469",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 469,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/469) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Very \nImportant Persons Security Unit officers, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \n\n30 \n \nthe Commissioner of Police, information as to the number thereof promoted from January \n2015 to November 2024, indicating the criteria used therefor.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat promotion in the Mauritius Police Force, including the Very Important Persons Security \nUnit (VIPSU), is governed by Regulations 14 and 19 of the Disciplined Forces Service \nCommission Regulations 1997. In line with these regulations, Police Standing Order No. 16 \nprovides that promotion within the Police Force is to be carried out as follows – \n1) \nby way of competitive examination by the Disciplined Forces Service \nCommission; \n2) \nupon successful completion of approved courses; \n3) \nas specialist within a specialised unit, and \n4) \non a seniority basis. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that, due to the \nspecialised nature of their duties and responsibilities, certain units of the Police Force, such as \nthe VIPSU, Special Mobile Force Engineering Squadron, National Coast Guard, Police \nHelicopter Squadron, National Security Service, Central Armoury, Police Dog Unit, among \nothers, are categorised as specialised units. Promotion within these units is supposed to be \ndone on the basis of experience, qualifications, merit, and seniority. \nBut this was not the case! We have seen how people who had been promoted by my \ngovernment – VIPSU personnel – their promotions were removed after so many years. This \nis unprecedented! Unprecedented! Removed and they were brought back to their original \npost. Two of them had to go to court and they won their case. Now they are going to be \nreinstated. \nAs for the numbers, from January 2015 to November 2024, 543 Police Officers posted \nat the VIPSU have been promoted to higher ranks as follows – \n(a) \n444 Police Officers of different ranks have been promoted as specialists. It is to \nbe highlighted that 225 of them were promoted, believe it or not, in 2024 itself; \n(b) \n11 Police Constables have been promoted to the rank of Police Sergeant after \nhaving successfully passed the competitive examination, and \n(c) \n22 Police Corporals and 66 Police Constables, reckoning at least 20 years of \nservice in the Police Force, promoted to the rank of Police Sergeant. \n\n31 \n \nBut as I have said, Madam Speaker, all this was done as if they chose who will be \npromoted and who will be degraded. This is how it was done. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. Once more, hon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and \nSouillac! \nAIRPORT HOLDINGS LTD – STAFF RECRUITMENT – PERIOD  2023-2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/470",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 470,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/470) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Airport Holdings Ltd. and its subsidiaries, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain information as to the number of workers recruited thereat over the period 2023 to \n2024, indicating the mode of recruitment used therefor.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Officer-in-Charge of \nAirport Holdings Ltd that for the period January 2023 to December 2024, 810 persons have \nbeen recruited at different positions. 810! 754 of them have been recruited through \nadvertising and the remaining 56 just by head hunting. In other words, you come, you do not \ncome. \nI am tabling the information requested for by the hon. Member. \nMadam Speaker, I want to bring to the attention of the House that when we look at the \nrecruitment at the level of the Mauritius Duty Free Paradise, 115 people were recruited, \nbelieve it or not, on 02 September 2024; in other words, only a few weeks prior to the \ndissolution of Parliament. In this specific case, those recruited were on probation for a period \nof only six months, which is again unusual, whereas the Collective Agreement between the \nUnion and the Management stipulates that new entry grade posts shall be for a period of one \nyear, not six months. \nThis is yet another example, Madam Speaker, of malpractice under the previous \nGovernment. As if they could do anything - forget the regulations - because the country \nbelonged to them. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Jhummun! \nMr Jhummun: Thank you. Can the hon. Prime Minister provide information as to \nwhether those who have been recruited lately will they be left unpunished or will actions be \ntaken against them? \n\n32 \n \nThe Prime Minister: All this is being looked at. \nMadam Speaker: Happy?  \nMr Jhummun: Yes. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. Now, I have hon. Rookny, Third Member for Pamplemousses \nand Triolet! \nPORT LOUIS PORT – QUAY CRANES OPERATION – PORT EFFICIENCY & \nCOMPETITIVENESS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/471",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 471,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/471) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Port \nof Port Louis, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Ports Authority, \ninformation as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of quay cranes currently; \n(i) \noperational, and \n(ii) \nnon-operational thereat, indicating in each case since when \n(b) \nmaximum number of vessels that can be accommodated or docked \nsimultaneously, and \n(c) \nmeasures being envisaged to enhance the efficiency and competitiveness \nthereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed by the Managing Director of the Cargo Handling Corporation Ltd that presently, \nthere are five quay cranes at the Mauritius Container Terminal and they are now fully \noperational. Previously, they were not;  now they are. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am also informed that the quay at the \nMauritius Container Terminal, which is operated by the Cargo Handling Corporation Ltd, is \n800 metres long and as such, two large container vessels of a capacity of up to 16,000 \ntwenty-foot equivalent units or a combination of three small container feeder vessels can be \naccommodated at any one time. The Multi-Purpose Terminal, on the other hand, has four \nquays to handle inter-island cargo, pure car carriers, livestock carriers, bulk coal, maize and \nsoya bean meal vessels as well as container vessels as and when required. Each of them can \naccommodate one cargo vessel at a time. \n\n33 \n \nMadam Speaker, modernisation and transformation of the Port Louis Harbour into an \nefficient port is a priority of this Government. To that effect, in line with the Government \nProgramme 2025-2029, Government recognises that a modern and efficient seaport will be of \ncritical importance to boost the competitiveness of our economy as a destination for foreign \ninvestment.  There will therefore be a total revamping of the port and other infrastructure to \nsupport maritime economic activities.   \nAt the heart of this transformation is effective management. To that end, a new \nManaging Director of the Cargo Handling Corporation Ltd was appointed on 12 December \n2024 and since then, the port situation has witnessed substantial improvement. \nThe level of absenteeism has dropped from 30% to 10% and daily sick leaves from 120 \nto just 10; which means the management is doing the job properly. There is discipline. There \nis no ship waiting time, which was previously six days, thus ensuring quicker turnaround \nnow. Weekly container moves have increased from 7,500 to 11,000. Bulk vessels are now \nbeing serviced within 3.5 to 4.5 days as compared to six to seven days. As a testament to this \nprogress, the Mediterranean Shipping Company has launched in March of this year, a direct \nBeira (Mozambique) route. This has significantly enhanced connectivity, reducing transit \ntime for containers to five to six days, compared to 40 days, Madam Speaker. \nAs regards part (c) of the question, I am informed that measures are being taken by both \nthe Mauritius Ports Authority and the Cargo Handling Corporation Ltd to enhance efficiency \nand competitiveness of the Port. These include the implementation of a Business Plan of the \nCargo Handling Corporation Ltd which has been approved by its Board on 02 May of this \nyear. This Plan aims to modernise operations, expand capacity, and strengthen \ncompetitiveness of the Cargo Handling Corporation Ltd. \nTo that effect, the Cargo Handling Corporation Ltd is planning to invest over the next \nfive years, an amount of Rs5.3 billion in the acquisition of state-of-the-art equipment, \nimplementation of green initiatives, capacity building and digitalisation of operations. \nAs an interim measure, procedures have been initiated by the Cargo Handling \nCorporation Ltd for the leasing of two mobile harbour cranes to address the demand of \nadditional transhipment volumes from shipping lines. \nIn addition, as recommended in the Port Master Plan, the Mauritius Ports Authority will \nproceed with the expansion of the container yard at the Mauritius Container Terminal over an \n\n34 \n \narea of about five hectares.  This project will increase the storage capacity of the Terminal \nand would thus improve operational efficiency. \nMadam Speaker: I have got only one minute left. Are you okay? Unfortunately, we \nwill not have time for the next question.  \nMr François: Next time. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nOkay. Please bear with me. The Table has been advised that the following PQs have \nbeen withdrawn B/473, B/476, B/479 and B/481. \nNow, we have questions addressed to hon. Ministers.  \nThe hon. Second Member for Grand’Baie and Poudre d'Or, hon. Beejan! \n2024 WRIT OF ELECTIONS – PUBLIC OFFICERS APPOINTMENT/PROMOTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-13-may-2025",
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/472",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 472,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/472) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the subsidised air-\nfares for the people of Rodrigues travelling to Mauritius, he will state if consideration will be \ngiven to maintain same for the forthcoming financial year and, if so, give details thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: The Rodrigues Subsidy on Airfare Scheme was introduced on 15 February \n2015 to provide subsidised airfares for individuals travelling from Rodrigues to Mauritius. \nThe objective of this measure was to promote greater mobility between the two islands and to \nensure parity in ticket pricing with the discounted fares available to Mauritian residents under \nthe special holiday package. \nWithout any subsidy on the airfares, a return air ticket from Rodrigues to Mauritius \ncosts approximately Rs8,490. With that scheme, passengers benefit from a fixed subsidy of \nRs1,856 during the peak season and Rs2,456 during the off-peak season. This subsidy is \njointly financed by the Government and Air Mauritius Ltd, with the Government covering \ntwo-thirds and Air Mauritius Ltd covering the remaining one-third. \nIt is to be highlighted that from February 2015 until March 2025, approximately \nRs267 m. has been disbursed as subsidy, benefiting around 185,000 passengers who have \ntaken advantage of the subsidised airfare. \n Passengers travelling from Rodrigues to Mauritius are not subject to any conditions, \nsuch as advance booking or a minimum number of nights’ stay to benefit from the subsidised \nairfare. \nThe Budget for the financial year 2025/2026 is under preparation, and the issue of \ncontinuing to grant the subsidy will be examined and will be announced thereafter. \nN. G. & CO. LTD. & SUBSIDIARIES – CONTRACTS AWARDED – PERIOD 2015-\n2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/473",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 473,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/473) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to N. G & Co. Ltd. and its subsidiaries, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \n\n121 \n \ninformation as to the number of contracts awarded thereto by Ministries and/or Parastatal \nbodies over the period 2015 to 2024, indicating in each case the – \n(a) \ncontractual value thereof, and  \n(b) \nprocurement method used therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIUS CITIZENSHIP – BENEFICIARIES DETAILS – PERIOD NOV \n2019-DEC 2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/474",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 474,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/474)  Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Mauritius Citizenship, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Passport \nand Immigration Office, information as to the number thereof granted to foreigners for the \nperiods November 2019 to November 2024 and December 2024 to date, indicating in each \ncase the – \n(a)  names of the beneficiaries thereof and their respective country of birth, and  \n(b)  section of the Mauritius Citizenship Act under which citizenship was granted.",
      "answer": "Reply: By virtue of the Mauritius Citizenship Act, the citizenship of Mauritius may be \ngranted by the Prime Minister under the different sections of the Act to non-citizens. From 01 \nNovember 2019 to 10 November 2024, 1,499 foreigners were granted citizenship of \nMauritius and from 14 November 2024 to 09 May 2025, 49 foreigners have been granted \ncitizenship of Mauritius.  \nIn regard to part (a), I do not think it is appropriate to give the names of the recipients \nof citizenship of our country.  However, information for part (b) is being compiled and will \nbe placed in the Library of the National Assembly. \nI seize this opportunity to inform the House that my Office is currently reviewing the \nprocedures relating to the issue of Mauritius Citizenship to foreigners. \n \nMR N. J. V. B. ARREST – POLICE BRUTALITY – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-13-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/475",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 475,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/475) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \n\n122 \n \nregard to the arrest of Mr N.J.V.B by the Police on 30 April 2025, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to whether an inquiry has \nbeen initiated into allegations of excessive use of force and police brutality thereon and, if so, \nindicate the actions, if any, taken to date, including disciplinary measures and/or provisional \ncharges brought against any of the officers involved therein.",
      "answer": "Reply: At the very outset, I wish to inform the House that my Government will not \ntolerate any form of police brutality under any circumstances whatsoever.   \nAs regards this incident, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that on Tuesday \n29 April 2025, one Mr. G. M. P. V. B., reported a case of larceny at Albion Police Station \nwherein he stated that on the same day, his grandson, one Mr. N. J. V. B., had stolen his \nprivate car from his place of residence at Albion.   \nOn Wednesday 30 April 2025, following reliable information obtained that the stolen \ncar was located around Nicolay Street, Sainte-Croix, a team comprising Police Officers from \nthe Crime Intelligence Unit of the Metropolitan North Division, mounted an operation to \ntrack the stolen car and apprehend the individual. Reaching Blanche Street, Roche Bois the \nPolice Officers identified the car and requested the driver to stop but the latter failed to do so. \nHe continued his way in the direction of Abercrombie by driving in a very dangerous manner \nalong the main road overtaking vehicles and without stopping at the red traffic light. At that \npoint Police lost sight of the vehicle. \nWhilst continuing its pursuit, the Police found the stolen car emerging from Muslim \nCemetery Street, Battery Cassée and again attempted to stop the vehicle. The suspect refused \nto do so and deliberately drove the vehicle onto the approaching Police Officers and escaped. \nWhilst escaping, the driver hit against a concrete wall, rammed into a police car, hit a \nprivate car and a motorcycle but still did not stop. It was also reported that by driving in such \nlife endangering manner in those narrow roads around Battery Cassée, a five-year-old boy got \ninjured and was admitted to hospital. \nThe escape of Mr. N. J. V. B. came to a halt when his way was obstructed by an \noncoming tractor along Muslim Cemetery Street. Even then, despite repeated requests to \nopen the door, he refused to cooperate with the Police, locking himself inside the car and \nagain trying to flee by driving forward and backward.  It should also be pointed out that \nseveral inhabitants of the region wanted to stop the driver because of the way he was acting. \nDue to the irresponsible behaviour of the driver which was endangering the lives of the \nresidents along Muslim Cemetery Road and other people as well as the immediate risk he \n\n123 \n \nposed to the Police Officers, the Police acted decisively and had to struggle to immobilize the \nvehicle and arrest the driver. \nMembers of the House must have also listened to the statement in the press of the \nmother of the five-year-old boy who stated – \n“……si la police pas ti arrête li, beaucoup dimoune ti pou blessé.  Capav ti pou éna \nène grand accident.  Capav éna dimoune ti pou mort.  Missié la ti pé crase partout vini \nmême.  Li ti pé roule extra vite.’’ \nI am further informed that during the struggle and the several accidents he met with \nduring the pursuit, the suspect sustained injuries. He was taken to Dr Jeetoo Hospital by the \nPolice and was later transferred to Clinic Darné, where he remains under police watch. \nThe case has already been referred to the CID of the Metropolitan North Division for \nenquiry. Same is ongoing. \nI wish to also inform the House that it is not the first time that Mr N. J. V. B.  has been \nreported to the Police. In fact, from 2019 to date, he has been involved in five larceny cases \nas well as one case of larceny with internal breaking, one case of larceny with violence and \none case of breach of conditions of bail. \nWith regard to allegations of police brutality, an inquiry has been initiated by the \nNational Human Rights Commission and my Office is closely following the matter. \nI would like to state that whilst this Government will do its utmost to uphold human \nrights, I will never allow any unruly element of society to undermine the authority of the \nPolice or threaten law and order in our country. \nRODRIGUES – CORRUPTION CASES – GOVERNMENT PROJECTS – \nINVESTIGATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/476",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 476,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/476) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the fight against \ncorruption in Rodrigues over the past three years, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Financial Crimes Commission, information as to the number of cases currently \nunder investigations thereat, indicating the number of public officials, service providers and \ncontractors who have been or are facing investigation, particularly in relation to the award of \ngovernment projects.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \n\n124 \n \nICAC & FCC – CORRUPTION CASES INVESTIGATED – PERIOD 2014-2024 \n(No. B/ 477) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to \ncorruption cases investigated formerly by the Independent Commission against Corruption \nand currently by the Financial Crimes Commission over the period 2014 to 2024, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain therefrom information as to the number thereof, indicating \nthe number thereof – \n(a) \ncompleted and referred to the Director of Public Prosecutions, and \n(b) \nnot yet completed and since when. \nReply: The Independent Commission Against Corruption, set up in accordance with \nthe defunct Prevention of Corruption Act 2002, was mandated to provide for the prevention \nand punishment of corruption and fraud.  The Financial Crimes Commission established \nunder the Financial Crimes Commission Act 2023, has, as mandate, to detect, investigate and \nprosecute financial crimes and any other ancillary offence connected thereto. \nFinancial crimes comprise several types of offences, including corruption offences. \nIn regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the FCC that, from 2014 to 2024, \ninvestigation in 150 corruption cases has been completed and referred to the Director of \nPublic Prosecutions. \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, 177 corruption cases are still under investigation. \nThe number of corruption cases investigated and not yet completed for period 2014 to \n2024 is being placed in the library of the National Assembly. \nAIR MAURITIUS CO. LTD – SSR AIRPORT – LEASED & UNUTILISED \nLAND",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/477",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 477,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –  \n \nWhether, in regard to corruption cases investigated formerly \nby the Independent Commission against Corruption and \ncurrently by the Financial Crimes Commission over the period \n2014 to 2024, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ntherefrom information as to the number thereof, indicating \nthe number thereof (a) completed and referred to the \nDirector of Public Prosecutions and (b) not yet completed and \nsince when?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/478",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 478,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/478) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to land owned by Air \nMauritius Co. Ltd. at the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain therefrom information as to the extent thereof, indicating the \nportion of unutilised land, if any, allocated/leased to third parties and the procedures followed \ntherefor. \n\n125",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Chief Executive Officer of Airports of Mauritius Co. Ltd, \nthe Aerodrome Operator for the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport, that on \n03 October 2014, the Ministry of Housing and Lands granted a 60-year industrial lease of a \ntotal approximate extent of 422ha2780.37m2 of land for the purpose of airport development. \nIn addition, Airports of Mauritius Co. Ltd acquired freehold land of an extent 32.58 \nhectares for airport development projects in line with the approved Airport Master Plan. \nA total extent of 70.58 hectares of land currently located outside the airport boundary is \nunutilised as follows – \n(a) \nState Land leased: 38 hectares, \n(b) \nFreehold Land purchased: 32.58 hectares. \nThe unutilised land has not been leased to third parties. \nCÔTE D’OR – 27 AUGUST 2024 PROTEST – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/479",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 479,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/479) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the incident which occurred during a protest at Côte d’Or on 27 August 2024, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to \nwhether an inquiry has been carried out thereinto, indicating if – \n(a) \nthe police had recourse to the use of force against the demonstrators, and  \n(b) \nprivate bouncers also intervened thereinto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nDEPUTY PERMANENT SECRETARY – 2023 RECRUITEMENT EXERCISE – \nSENIORITY CRITERIA",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-13-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/480",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 480,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/480) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre D'or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the post \nof Deputy Permanent Secretary, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number of officers \nrecruited following the advertisement issued therefor in 2023, and \n(b) \nstate if consideration will be given to reverting the recruitment process thereof \nto one based on seniority from the grade of Assistant Permanent Secretary. \n\n126",
      "answer": "Reply: In regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Public Service \nCommission that following an advertisement issued by the Commission on 26 April 2023, 23 \nAssistant Permanent Secretaries were appointed as Deputy Permanent Secretary in a \ntemporary capacity for a period of six months in April 2024. \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, prior to 2021, appointment to the post of Deputy \nPermanent Secretary was made by promotion on the basis of experience and merit, of officers \nin the grade of Assistant Permanent Secretary, who reckon at least eight years of service in a \nsubstantive capacity in the grade. \nHowever, the Pay Research Bureau has, in its 2021 Report, recommended that the \nrecruitment of Deputy Permanent Secretary be made by selection from among officers in the \ngrade of Assistant Permanent Secretary reckoning only six years instead of eight years of \nservice.  The recruitment exercise carried out in 2023 was based on the recommendations of \nthe 2021 PRB Report. \nIn view of the responsibilities devolving upon the post of Deputy Permanent Secretary \nand with a view to ensuring that we have officers with the required skills and competencies to \noperate at that level, the mode of appointment to this post will be taken up with the Pay \nResearch Bureau in the context of the forthcoming PRB Report. \n \nPORT LOUIS – LINE BARRACKS – DRIVING TESTS – JANUARY-MAY 2025",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/481",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 481,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/481) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to driving \ntests at the Line Barracks in Port Louis, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the number thereof carried out since the beginning \nof January 2025 to date, indicating the – \n(a) \nmaximum number thereof conducted daily; \n(b) \ntime scheduled therefor, and  \n(c) \nnumber of Police Officers deployed therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \n \n\n127 \n \nMOKA DISTRICT COUNCIL – FINANCIAL MISMANAGEMENT ENQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/482",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 482,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms",
      "question": "(No. B/482) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms whether, in regard to the \nappointment/promotion of public officers carried out following the issue of the writ of \nelections on 04 October 2024, he will state if consideration will be given for the revocation of \nsame. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister of Public Service!",
      "answer": "Mr Pentiah: Madam Speaker, may I please first and foremost thank the hon. Member \nfor his question.  \nMadam Speaker, in my reply to PQ B/9 dated 04 February of this year, I informed the \nHouse amongst other things, that no recruitment exercise had been carried out by the Public \nService Commission, the Disciplined Forces Service Commission and Local Government \nService Commission after the issue of the writ of elections dated 04 October 2024.  \nThe more so, Madam Speaker, the Public Service Commission had, on 08 October \n2024, issued two circulars notifying responsible officers of all Ministries to stay action on \nappointment to be made under delegated powers and on issue of public advertisement for \nfilling of vacancies until further notice. On the same date, that is, 08 October 2024, a circular \nwas also issued by the Secretary of the Cabinet of the time and Head of Civil Service, \ndrawing the attention of the supervising officers of Ministries and departments to the code of \nconduct which had been elaborated by the Electoral Supervisory Commission (ESC) for the \n\n35 \n \n2024 National Assembly elections. Supervising officers were, accordingly, also advised to \nstand guided by the provision of the Code of Ethics for public officers.  \nMadam Speaker, I have also informed the House that following the appointment \nexercises carried out from July to September 2024, 281 officers had joined the public sector \nafter the issue of writ of elections, and drew attention to the fact that such a situation occurred \nin a matter of days prior to 04 October and beyond 04 October 2024. \nIt is to be noted, Madam Speaker, that PQ B/9 concerned recruitment in the public \nsector whereas today, the hon. Member’s PQ, is also addressing the issue of promotion. I am \ninformed that letters of offer of appointment and promotion were issued during the election \nperiod as follows, Madam Speaker – \n(i) \non the date of writ of elections, i.e., 04 October: 63 cases, \n(ii) \nafter the date of issue of writ of elections: 181 cases, including 173 cases of \npromotion in the Police Department approved by DFSC since 23 September \n2024. \nMadam Speaker, in line with circulars from the PSC and the Secretary of the Cabinet – \nthe Head of the Civil Service, actions have been restrained regarding the issue of offers of \nappointment and of promotion until further notice. In view of the complexity of the matter \nand the wide range implications, further consultations need to be held with the relevant \nparties concerned, and advice is awaited on this issue from the Office of the Attorney General \nbefore a final decision is taken on this matter. \nI thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nThe Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue, hon. Caserne! \nBOULINGRIN TUNNEL, LONG MOUNTAIN – WATER ACCUMULATION – \nREMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/483",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 483,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/483) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the Boulingrin \ntunnel at Long Mountain, along the Terre Rouge Verdun Motorway, he will state if he has \nbeen made aware of water accumulation thereat during and after heavy rainfall thereby \nrendering same inaccessible for pedestrians and, if so, indicate – \n\n36 \n \n(a) \nthe urgent remedial measures being envisaged therefor, including the construction \nof drains, and \n(b) \nif consideration will be given for the construction of a new access road to serve \nthe region.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, I am informed by Road Development Authority that in \nthe context of the construction of Terre Rouge-Verdun-Trianon Link Road in December \n2013, an existing access road linking the village of Boulingrin to Long Mountain was cut off \nas it was crossing the alignment of the Terre Rouge-Verdun Link Road. \nUnder the circumstances, with a view to maintaining access, the underpass or tunnel at \nBoulingrin was constructed to cater for passage of local agricultural workers and landowners.  \nI am further informed that in view of the topography of the site where the underpass is \nlocated and due to mud from passing of heavy vehicles, there is recurrent water and mud \naccumulation thereat. Regular maintenance works such as cleaning of drains, vegetation \ncontrols are accordingly carried out by the RDA, whenever the need arises. \nWith a view to resolving the issue of water accumulation, a site visit was carried out on \n08 April 2024 at the underpass by officers of RDA, the NDU, the Land Drainage Authority, \nand the District Council of Pamplemousses. The LDA was accordingly requested to carry out \nan assessment of the catchment area and propose measures to mitigate and resolve the issue \nof water accumulation thereat. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the LDA that \nseveral measures have been recommended to address the matter, including the reinstatement \nof the cross drains connecting the track road drains to feeder Muemur and fitting with metal \ngratings to prevent water ponding. Other proposed remedial measures are being discussed \nwith the RDA regarding their feasibility. \nIn addition, I am informed by the LDA that the District Council of Pamplemousses \nundertook cleaning of vegetation around the underpass and the existing storm water drain in \nFebruary 2025. A follow-up cleaning is scheduled in two weeks as part of its ongoing in-\nhouse maintenance. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed that the region of Boulingrin is \nalready connected to the Montagne Longue-Crève Coeur (B19) Road through an existing \nroad. As such, there is no need to provide an alternative road for the region of Boulingrin. \nHowever, given that the existing road which connects Boulingrin to the B19 Road is a non-\n\n37 \n \nclassified road and is narrow, consideration may be given to the widening of the road by the \nDistrict Council of Pamplemousses. \nMadam Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 6 – WATER ISSUES – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/484",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 484,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/484) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the water problems \nbeing faced by the inhabitants of Constituency No. 6, Grand Bay and Poudre D’or, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of broken water pipes and repairs works undertaken thereat since \nDecember 2024 to date, and  \n(b) \nmeasures being envisaged to address same.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, je suis informé par la Central Water Authority \nqu’elle a enregistré un total de 1,470 plaintes liées à des conduites d’eau cassées et à des \nfuites au cours de la période du 1er décembre 2024 à ce jour dans les régions de Grand Baie et \nde Poudre d'Or. \nJe suis également informé qu’un total de 1,150 travaux de réparation ont été effectués \nau cours de la même période du 1er décembre 2024 par une équipe interne de la CWA et par \ndes entrepreneurs. À la demande de mon ministère, la CWA a déployé des moyens \nlogistiques supplémentaires et a renforcé ses équipes opérationnelles.  \nAinsi, Madame la présidente, le nombre d’équipes opérant dans la zone nord est passé \nde trois à quatre depuis février 2025. Tous les opérateurs et ouvriers qui effectuaient \nauparavant des travaux de remplacement des tuyaux en interne ont été transférés à l’équipe de \nréparations et d’interventions. Ils ont reçu du matériel supplémentaire. En moyenne, cette \nnouvelle structure/nouvelle équipe peut effectuer 216 réparations par mois contre 168 \nauparavant.  \nLe problème récurrent des ruptures de tuyaux et des fuites dans la région, Madame la \nprésidente, est en grande partie due à la présence de canalisations anciennes et défectueux, \nnotamment dans les secteurs de Pointe aux Canonniers, Grand Baie, Goodlands, Petit \nRaffray, Vale, Roche Terre et Grand Gaube. \n\n38 \n \nJe suis informé que la CWA a identifié 35 km de tuyaux de canalisation défectueux \ndans les localités susmentionnées qui doivent être remplacés afin d’améliorer \nl’approvisionnement en eau et la pression. \nMadam Speaker: Is that alright? \n(Interruptions) \nThe hon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet!  \nI understand B/485 is going to be replied by the hon. Minister of Labour. \nMAVEN MGT LTD & VALDUS CO. LTD – OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE &   \nSALARY REVIEW CONTROVERSY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/485",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 485,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/485) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to Maven \nManagement Ltd. and VALDUS Co Ltd., she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \nthe Financial Services Commission, information as to whether – \n(a) \nthe beneficial ownership of Mr G.C. therein was disclosed upon the \napplication of a management licence and, if not, indicate the actions taken \nthereon, and \n(b) \nshe has been made aware of any case of alleged favouritism in the realignment \nof salaries of certain employees at the Commission by the salary commissioner \nVALDUS Co Ltd. and, if so, indicate if any investigation has been or will be \ninitiated thereinto.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Labour & Industrial Relations (Mr R. Uteem): Thank you, Madam \nSpeaker. With regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Financial Services \nCommission that on 19 June 2023 when the application for a managed corporate service \nprovider license for Maven Management Ltd was submitted to the FSC, it was disclosed that \nMr G.C. would own hundred percent beneficial ownership of Maven Management Ltd. \nHowever, I am also informed that in the same application, it was mentioned that Mr \nG.C. was Head of HR and Managing Director of VALDUS Co Ltd. Now, the House must \nnote that the same VALDUS Co Ltd. had obtained a contract for the review of the salary and \nterms and conditions of employment as well as the review of organisational structure, \nincluding man plan for the FSC in June 2022 and in December 2022, respectively. The report \nwas approved by the Board of the FSC on 22 June 2023. \n\n39 \n \nMadam Speaker, the fact that staffs of the FSC were asked and called upon to \ndetermine an application for a licence by the very same person who was reviewing their \nsalary structure raises serious issues of good governance and conflict of interest. The fact that \nMr G.C. was doing the salary review and ended up having a management licence within \nweeks of making the application raises again doubt as to whether this was given as a reward \nfor the report that he has submitted. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (b) of the question, I am informed by the FSC that after \nthe staff of the FSC signed the option form to agree to be governed by the report, several \nstaffs made representations that the report favoured certain positions. In the light of the \nrepresentation received, Valdus Ltd – the consultant – was required to submit an Errors \nOmission and Anomaly Report and same was submitted in April 2024. However, I am \ninformed that this report has not yet been circulated to the staff. The report is yet to be \nconsidered by the Board of the FSC. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Rookny! \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, can the hon. Minister inform the House whether, a \nformer employee of Valdus Ltd was recruited on contract by the Commission just a few \nmonths before the review exercise and the status of the same person was changed to a \npermanent position just a few weeks before general elections started? \nMr Uteem: Madam Speaker, according to the information communicated to me by the \nFSC, indeed there is one Mr K.G. who was a part-time employee of Valdus, the consultant. \nHe was recruited by the FSC a few weeks before the contract was awarded to Valdus, again \nraising doubts about the independence of Valdus. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, in light of these incestuous relationships that we are \nseeing prevailing at the FSC, could the Minister advise the House whether, his Ministry will \nrecommend to the Cabinet a complete upheaval of the FSC? \nMadam Speaker: Are you in a position… \nMr Uteem: The hon. Member will note that I am not the substantive Minister but I will \nconvey the message to the substantive Minister. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, exactly! That’s it! Thank you, Minister. Okay? He will convey.  \n\n40 \n \nAlright, now we have the hon. Second Member for Savanne and Black River, Mr \nJugurnauth! \nHOME GARDENING – TRAINING PROGRAMMES/AWARENESS CAMPAIGNS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/486",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 486,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/486) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard \nto home gardening, he will state if consideration will be given for the introduction of targeted \ntraining programmes or awareness campaigns to promote same among the public.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: I thank my hon. friend. I will table the reply, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: We did not hear. \nAn hon. Member: The reply will be tabled. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, he will table it. Thank you very much. Therefore, I now have \nthe hon. Second Member for Rodrigues, Mr François! \n⁠RODRIGUES – QUATRE VENTS-DANS DARISSE, PISTACHE & BAIE TOPAZE – \nDRAIN PROJECTS UPDATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/487",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 487,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/487) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nNational Infrastructure whether, in regard to drains projects in Constituency No. 21, \nRodrigues, particularly at Quatre Vents-Dans Darisse, Pistache and Baie Topaze, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the National Development Unit and the Land Drainage \nAuthority, information in each case as to where matters stand. \nMadam Speaker: At long last!",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the National Development Unit that \nthe bids for the projects drain works at Quatre Vents-Dans Darisse, raising of ford at Baie \nTopaze and box culvert upstream and raising of ford at Pistache in Rodrigues were invited on \n3 March 2025 with the closing date of 16 April 2025. The three drain projects estimated to \ncost around Rs174 million are currently at evaluation stage at the level of the Central \nProcurement Board. \nI am further informed that works are expected to start during the next financial year.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, that was Mr François. Are you okay?  \nThe hon. Second Member for Savanne and Black River, Mr Jugurnauth! \n\n41 \n \n⁠SAVANNE DISTRICT COUNCIL – MONT BLANC VILLAGE – JURISDICTION – \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-13-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/488",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 488,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/488) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the village of Mont Blanc, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the District Council of Savanne, information as to \nthe village council under whose jurisdiction it administratively falls, indicating the corrective \nmeasures being envisaged in relation thereto, if any.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I am advised that the Mont Blanc is a village under the \nadministrative jurisdiction of the District Council of Savanne with approximately 110 \ninhabitants. According to the outline planning scheme for the Grand Port-Savanne District \nCouncil area, Mont Blanc is situated outside the defined settlement boundary of Chamouny \nand is located 1.5 km from that boundary. As a result, residents are currently prohibited from \nundertaking any development projects since such development is only permitted within \nofficially designated settlement boundaries.  \nFollowing repeated representations from the local residents, the District Council of \nSavanne formally requested the Town and Country Planning Board to include Mont Blanc \nwithin the settlement boundary. The Board which is responsible for preparing outline \nplanning schemes, has extended the operative period of the Savanne District Council’s \noutline planning scheme to December 2027 to allow for a comprehensive review. \nMadam Speaker, the Town and Country Planning Board has informed my Ministry that \nthe rural outline planning schemes were approved in 2006 and revised in 2011 with their \nvalidity extended on several occasions, now up to December 2027. These schemes are based \non the National Development Strategy (NDS) which was adopted in 2005. In July 2019, a \nconsultancy contract was awarded to review the NDS. Once the revised NDS Vision 2040 is \napproved, all urban and rural planning schemes will be updated accordingly. Data collection \nand mapping exercise already began this year in January 2025. Modifications to any scheme, \nincluding Mont Blanc request will be considered during this full review process and not on an \nad hoc basis. \nThe specific request to designate Mont Blanc as a minor settlement will be assessed \nduring this comprehensive review. As stipulated by the Town and Country Planning Act, any \nmodification to any outline planning scheme requires the formal approval of the President of \nthe Republic. Mont Blanc has been continuously inhabited since 1894 and is served by public \n\n42 \n \ntransport, electricity and water supply. The District Council of Savanne also provides \nessential services, including street lighting and refuse collection. \nThank you.  \nMadam Speaker: I am sorry, Minister. There are so many changes. I am trying to \nfollow, alright? Is everybody happy? Any supplementary question?  \nOkay, so now we proceed with Mr Venkatasami, Third Member for Quartier Militaire \nand Moka and this will be replied by hon. Minister of Local Government. Is that right? \nQUARTIER MILITAIRE – ST MARTIN DAM LEISURE PARK – PROJECT \nDETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-13-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/489",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 489,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/489) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the St Martin Dam Leisure \nPark Project in Quartier Militaire, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nDistrict Council of Moka, information as to where matters stand, indicating – \n(a) \nthe scope of works and cost thereof; \n(b) \nif there is any cost overrun and delays for the completion thereof and, if so, give \ndetails thereof, and  \n(c) \nif a quantity surveyor has been appointed therefor and, if so, the name of the \nincumbent. \nMadam Speaker: Yes!",
      "answer": "The Minister of Local Government (Mr R. Woochit): Madam Speaker, with your \npermission, I will reply to this question as it concerns my Ministry. As regards part (a) of the \nquestion, I am informed that the St Martin Dam Leisure Park Project at Quartier Militaire was \napproved during the Financial Year 2017-2018. The proposed development which spread \nover a 12 acres plot of land is indeed a good initiative for the region. However, this \nimplementation has been marked by poor planning, doubtful procurement practices and a \nfragmented execution strategy under the previous administrations.  \nInstead of adopting a streamline and transparent design and build model which would \nhave allowed for better coordination, faster delivery and improved cost control, the former \nadministration chose to split the project into multiple components. These were allocated to \nvarious contractors through a patchwork of procurement methods, including request for \nsealed quotations, restricted bidding, direct procurement and open advertised bidding. This \n\n43 \n \nfragmented approach made project management more difficult and raised serious concerns \nabout favouritism and lack of transparency. The scope of works as submitted by the District \nCouncil of Moka includes the following components – \n• \nA 2,000 square feet reception building with toilet block, cloakroom and cafeteria; \n• \nA 17,000 square feet multipurpose hall with reception area, dining space, kitchen \nfacilities and separate hall for conferences and other events; \n• \nThree natural ponds surrounded by concrete walkways; \n• \nOne acre esplanade with children’s corner and graded seating area; \n• \nA 750-metre health track; \n• \nAn outdoor gym; \n• \nAn endemic garden with walkways; \n• \nThree bridges; \n• \nA road network, and \n• \nTwo parking spaces with capacity for approximately 250 vehicles. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question on cost overrun and delays, the \nproject was initially estimated at Rs45 million. However, the cost has now escalated to \nRs77.5 million. Additionally, the District Council of Moka has indicated a need for a further \nRs8.5 million to complete the road surfacing within the park. \nThis considerable cost overrun, the lengthy delay, and despite the project started 8 years \nago are largely due to the repeated modifications and the inclusion of new components by the \nprevious administration. These additions were not part of the original approved scope of work \nand had led to unnecessary expenditure and delay the completion of the project. Such \npractices are evidence of inadequate planning and poor project oversight by the previous \ngovernment, resulting in the misuse of public funds and significant delays in providing \nessential community infrastructure.  \nTo address this situation, I have instructed the District Council of Moka to ensure that \nthe project is fully completed not later than 15 August 2025. \nIn regard to part (c) of the question, concerning the appointment of a Quantity \nSurveyor, I wish to inform the House that the District Council of Moka did not appoint one \nfor this project. Instead, the Public Infrastructure Department of the Council has been \nresponsible for both the design and supervision of works. \n\n44 \n \nMadam Speaker, I wish to reassure the hon. Third Member of Quartier Militaire and \nMoka that the St Martin Dam Leisure Park will be completed by the revised deadline, that is, \non 15 August 2025. My ministry is closely monitoring the final phase of implementation to \nensure that the project is delivered without any further delays. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, I should have informed you that PQ B/525 will also \nbe replied by the hon. Minister of Local Government later.  \nNow, we will carry on with hon. First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \nLE MORNE BRABANT MOUNTAIN/HERITAGE SITES – VANDALISM ACTS – \nPREVENTIVE MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/490",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 490,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/490) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the circulation of \noffending images of sacred places and world heritage sites in the media, he will state if he has \nbeen made aware of same and, if so, indicate the measures being envisaged in relation \nthereto.",
      "answer": "Mr Gondeea: Madam Speaker, on 06 February 2025, I was informed by the Le Morne \nHeritage Trust Fund, a parastatal body under the aegis of my Ministry, of two highly, \ndisturbing incidents – \n(i) \nthe circulation of a video showing an individual dancing to a Mauritian song \ncontaining foul and offensive language on the grounds of the Trou Chenilles \nOpen Air Museum, located at the foot of Le Morne Brabant Mountain – a world \nheritage cultural landscape site, and \n(ii) \nthe appearance of a large graffiti on the rock of Le Morne Brabant Mountain \nwith inscription, such as ‘Jennifer’, ‘J’, ‘J.F.S’ and ‘25.01.25’. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that the matter was reported to the Police on 07 \nFebruary 2025 and an entry was duly recorded in the Occurrence Book at La Gaulette Police \nStation by an officer of Le Morne Heritage Trust Fund. I am further informed that \ninvestigations are ongoing.  \nUpon being informed, I gave immediate instructions for the removal of the graffiti. \nDespite the dangerous topography of the mountain and adverse weather conditions which \nwere prevailing at that time, the operation was completed on 19 February 2025 by a guide \n\n45 \n \nfrom Le Morne Village, with the assistance of a heritage guide from Le Morne Heritage Trust \nFund. The first attempt on 08 February removed 90% of the markings and the second \nsucceeded fully.  \nMadam Speaker, unfortunately, this was not an isolated occurrence. On 12 March 2025, \na video circulated on TikTok showing two individuals sitting on the cross at the summit of Le \nMorne Brabant Mountain, presumably consuming alcohol. The video provoked national \nindignation, and the individuals concerned issued a public apology on 14 March 2025. \nMadam Speaker, what is of equal concern and regret is the failure of the previous \ngovernment and the former Board of the Le Morne Heritage Trust Fund to have ever \nestablished a formal protocol or proactive framework to prevent or swiftly address such acts. \nAfter years of relentless efforts and advocacy under the administration of the then hon. \nPrime Minister, Dr. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, Le Morne was proudly inscribed as a \nUNESCO World Heritage Site in 2008.  \nYet, despite this historic achievement, the regime that came to power in 2014, \nunfortunately, displayed a shocking level of neglect. For nearly a decade, they failed to \nimplement even the most basic protective measures. No signage, no surveillance, no \npreventive strategy and not even a contingency plan to address acts of desecration or \nvandalism. Such negligence reflects a profound disregard for the preservation of one of our \nnation’s most sacred heritage site.  \nMadam Speaker, upon taking cognizance of this incident, my Ministry convened an \nemergency meeting with Le Morne Heritage Trust Fund and launched a comprehensive set of \nmeasure, namely – \n(i) \ninstallation of prominent signage at key points across Le Morne cultural \nlandscape to inform visitors of the sacredness of the site and prohibit \ndisrespectful actions; \n(ii) \nfurther developed education and awareness among local communities, schools \nand tourists to cultivate a sense of reverence and historical consciousness; \n(iii) \nenhanced surveillance and law enforcement cooperation with relevant \nauthorities; \n(iv) \ndevelopment of a formal contingency and incident response protocol to be \nadministered by the Le Morne Heritage Trust Fund. \n\n46 \n \nMadam Speaker, I am pleased to inform the House that bids for signage panels have \nalready been launched and installation will start shortly. The other measures are well \nunderway. Furthermore, unlike my predecessors, I am taking steps to initiate a review of the \nLe Morne Heritage Trust Fund Act and relevant laws, with the assistance of the Attorney \nGeneral’s Office, to introduce explicit provisions and appropriate sanctions against \ndesecration, vandalism or acts causing moral damage to sacred and heritage sites. \nPresently, the only applicable legal provision remains section 17 of the National \nHeritage Fund Act 2003, which narrowly addresses unlawful damage or defacement. This \nlegal vacuum concerning moral desecration will no longer be tolerated.  \nMadam Speaker, my ministry remains steadfast in its mission to preserve the sanctity \nand dignity of Le Morne and all other heritage sites across Mauritius and we shall act with \nboth firmness and foresight – something that regrettably has been missing for far too long. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. We have only three minutes left.  \nHon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nMINISTRY OF YOUTH & SPORTS – ADVISERS (APPOINTMENT & BENEFITS)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-13-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/491",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 491,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/491) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Advisors attached to the Ministry, \nhe will state in each case the – \n(a) \nname and date of appointment thereof, and  \n(b) \nterms and conditions of their respective contract, including the remunerations and \nbenefits drawn.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, with your permission, in light of the number of \nAdvisers attached to my Ministry, which include 15 Advisers/Coaches, I am tabling all the \nrequested information.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, one supplementary! \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. Peut-on savoir parmi les conseillers de \nl’honorable ministre des Sports, s’il y en a parmi qui cumulent une deuxième fonction \ntombant sous un autre organisme de son ministère ? Si oui, lequel, et ses responsabilités, et \nbien sûr, ses salaires et autres avantages ? \n\n47 \n \nMadam Speaker: Are you able to answer that? \nMr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, I am not aware of what the hon. Member is saying. \nI will check and report to the House. \nMadam Speaker: Of course! You can come back with another question once you see \nthe paper tabled.  \nMr Quirin: J’espère, Madame la présidente, que j’aurai la réponse. \nMadam Speaker: Of course! L’espoir fait vivre! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Quirin: Ah non, je ne suis pas un imbécile !  Je ne suis pas un imbécile ! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: I think we can go for lunch now! Thank you! \nAt 12.59 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.33 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Please be seated! \nYes, hon. First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix! \nMAURICE STRATÉGIE – EMPLOYEES & CONSULTANTS – SALARIES & \nBENEFITS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/492",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 492,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/492) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to Maurice \nStratégie, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom for the fiscal year 2024-\n2025 information as to the – \n(a)  total monthly expenditure incurred on the salaries and benefits of the employees \nand consultants thereof, and  \n(b)  qualification and salary and benefits drawn by the Executive Director thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Uteem: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with your permission, I shall answer this question \nin the absence of the substantive Minister. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. \n\n48 \n \nMr Uteem: In reply to PQ B/304 on 08 April 2025, the substantive Minister informed \nthe House that Maurice Stratégie employed 28 officers since its creation. Following the \ndeparture of two officers on 25 April and 02 of May, Maurice Stratégie now currently \nemploys 26 employees. \nAs regard part (a) of the question, the total monthly expenditure incurred on the salaries \nand other benefits to the employees for the month of April 2025 stood at Rs2,576,314. It is to \nbe noted, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that Maurice Stratégie has not hired the services of any \nconsultant. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by Maurice Stratégie that the \nExecutive Director holds a BSc (Hons) in Economics and Finance from the University of \nMauritius and a MSc Economics and Development Economics from the University of \nNottingham in England. \nThe Executive Director has been appointed on a contractual basis for a period of three \nyears with effect from 09 September 2024. He earns a monthly salary of Rs312,000 and \ndraws the following benefits – \na) \ncar allowance of Rs20,000; \nb) \ntravelling allowance of Rs20,000, and \nc) \nmobile phone allowance of Rs2,000. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Supplementary! \nMr Lobine: Yes, can the hon. Minister inform this House with regard to this Executive \nDirector and Maurice Stratégie, is it still a feasible strategy to have Maurice Stratégie in as \nmuch as it should have been an independent think tank for government in as much as no such \nreport or documents have been produced and we are not aware of what they have been doing \nfor all these months? \nMr Uteem: As regard the first part of the question, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, you would \nagree that I am not the substantive Minister and it is for the substantive Minister to decide \nwhether this Maurice Stratégie has still a raison-d’être. \nWith regard to the second part of the question, I am informed that Maurice Stratégie has \nsubmitted 17 Reports and Research Papers since its creation. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, thank you. \n\n49 \n \nThe hon. Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil! \nLOCAL AUTHORITIES – 2024 RECRUITMENT – BUDGETARY PROVISION \n& FINANCIAL IMPACT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/493",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 493,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/493) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to officers recruited by local authorities in \n2024, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the total number thereof, \nindicating – \n(a)  if these recruitments were accounted for in the budget, and  \n(b)  the financial impact thereof on the respective local authority.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to present a clear explanation of the \nrecent recruitment activities within the local authorities highlighting the serious \nmismanagement and malpractice performed by the former Chairperson of the Local \nGovernment Service Commission (LGSC) and the previous regime. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in response to part (a) of the question between 01 January and \n03 October 2024, a total of 1,765 appointments were effected within local authorities. Out of \nthese 1,765 appointments, it is shocking and surprising to note that 599 posts mainly are \nRefuse Collectors, Handy Workers and General Workers which were created without \nbudgetary provision, resulting in an expenditure of approximately Rs10 million monthly. \nFurthermore, it is scandalous that out of the 1,765 appointments effected last year, 998 \nappointments were made during the period between 03 of September and 03 of October 2024, \nbarely a month before the general elections. This figure represents 56.5% of the total \nappointments and this is viewed as a serious concern. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is also important to highlight that out of these 1,765 \nappointments made, 1,731 were authorised solely by the former Chairperson of the LGSC, \nthus entirely bypassing the statutory requirement for collective decision making by the full \nCommission. This unilateral action is a flagrant breach of the Local Government Service \nCommission Regulations 1984 and represents a gross abuse of authority. \nOn 10 December 2024, the LGSC sought legal advice from the Attorney-General’s \nOffice to determine whether the appointments made by the former Chairperson were legally \nin order. The Attorney General’s Office replied that all appointments and/or promotions \n\n50 \n \neffected unilaterally by the Chairperson are legally tinted with nullity. Disturbingly, no legal \nadvice was sought until December 2024 despite the irregular practices started as far back as \nJanuary 2022. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, despite this, the Local Government Service Commission could \nnot act earlier due to the absence of a fully constituted board. It is to be noted that the \ncommission was reconstituted only on 28 March 2025.  \nI am apprised that out of the 1,765 appointments, the Attorney General’s Office \nrecommended that the employment of 1,368 candidates who are employed on a day-to-day \nbasis and 95 candidates who are employed on a month-to-month basis should be terminated. \nHowever, the decision to act upon this advice regarding these unlawful appointments’ rests \nsolely with the Local Government Service Commission, that is, the LGSC which is an \nindependent and autonomous body.  \nAdditionally, the malpractices of the former Chairperson have been formally reported \nto the Financial Crimes Commission (FCC). The FCC is now assessing the broader \nimplications and institutional breaches of this mass recruitment exercise. We are awaiting the \nreport of the FCC which will guide further administrative and legal actions.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, to be honest, it is the ordinary citizens who are paying the \nprice for the irresponsibility of the previous regime. Resources meant for essential services, \nsuch as waste collections, street lighting and committee services, were diverted to fund \npolitically motivated and unlawful appointments.   \nThis Government will not tolerate such abuses. We are committed to restoring integrity \nand accountability in all recruitment processes. Thank you.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: B/494! Hon. Dr. Ms Thannoo is not in the House. So, I take it \nthat there will be a written answer for this question as the question has not been withdrawn. \nNow, I call B/495! Hon. Second Member for Savanne and Black River! \nBOIS D’OISEAUX & AVENUE BOULODROM, BLACK RIVER – DRAIN \nPROJECTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/494",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 494,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/494) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Moka District Council, he \nwill state if his Ministry will initiate an inquiry into the alleged case of mismanagement of the \nfinances thereof over the past ten years.",
      "answer": "Reply: I wish to inform that my Ministry has been apprised of serious allegations of \nmismanagement of public funds and breaches of procurement procedures at the District \nCouncil of Moka over the last decade.  \nFirstly, following a preliminary internal assessment and findings, the former Chief \nExecutive of the Council was interdicted from duty with effect from 05 February 2025, in \naccordance with Regulation 31 of the Local Government Service Commission Regulations \n1984. The Local Government Service Commission has been duly notified.  \nSecondly, a team from the Internal Control Unit of the Ministry of Finance is currently \nconducting a detailed inquiry into cases of mismanagement relating to procurement exercises. \nIn parallel, the District Council of Moka has initiated a review of its procurement practices to \nensure strict compliance with the Public Procurement Act 2006, its associated regulations, \nand directives issued by the Procurement Policy Office.  \nIn addition to these actions, my Ministry has been informed by the Council that the \nFinancial Crimes Commission (FCC) is presently conducting a Financial Crimes Prevention \nReview (FCPR). This statutory review, undertaken under Section 6(2)(i) of the Financial \nCrimes Commission Act 2023, focuses on all procurement exercises carried out at the \nCouncil during the last ten years. Its objective is to uncover financial irregularities, promote \nlegal compliance, and issue formal recommendations to strengthen financial governance and \naccountability mechanisms.  \nGiven the scope and seriousness of this independent review by the FCC – an institution \nempowered by law to investigate corruption and financial crimes –, it would be advisable to \nawait the outcome of the FCPR before initiating any additional or parallel inquiries.  \nI wish to reaffirm this Government's unwavering commitment to transparency, good \ngovernance, and zero tolerance for corruption across all local authorities. Should the hon. \nMember or any other party possess verifiable evidence of specific malpractices or fraudulent \nacts, I invite them to submit such information directly to the FCC.  \n \n \n\n128 \n \nLAND RESEARCH & MONITORING UNIT – ALLEGED LAND DISPOSSESSION – \nLEGISLATION AMENDMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/495",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 495,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/495) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the recent site visit effected by \nthe representatives of the Land Drainage Authority (LDA) at Bois d’Oiseaux and Avenue \nBoulodrom in Black River, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the LDA, \n\n51 \n \ninformation to where matters stand regarding the drain projects being envisaged thereat, \nindicating the expected timeline for the implementation thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that the region of Boulodrom, \nBlack River has been declared as a high-risk flood-prone area by the Land Drainage \nAuthority. The LDA has recommended that the project flood mitigating measure at \nBoulodrom, Black River be implemented by the Drain Infrastructure Construction Ltd at Bois \nd’Oiseaux and Avenue Boulodrom, with a view to mitigating flooding in that region. The \ndetailed design has already been finalised and approved by the LDA. \nMr Deputy, Speaker, Sir, the project is estimated to cost some Rs232 m. I am informed \nby the DICL that the draft bidding document for the construction works has already been \nprepared and same would be launched once funding is made available. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the project is expected to start during the course of the next \nfinancial year subject to availability of funds.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question! Hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre \nBornes! \nBEAU SEJOUR COMMUNITY CENTRE – RENOVATION WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/496",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 496,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/496) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the Beau \nSejour Community Centre, she will state if any renovation project thereof, including its yard, \nis being envisaged and, if so, give details thereof and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Ms Navarre-Marie: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have been made aware of the \ndeplorable state of the Beau Sejour Community Centre. I wish to thank the hon. Member for \nthe pictures forwarded to me on same. \nI am informed that procedures for renovation works at Beau Sejour Community Centre \nhave been initiated by the Sugar Industry Labour Welfare Fund. The works, inter alia, \ncomprise replacement of tiles in the hall and kitchen. Cabinets have also been fixed in the \nkitchen. I am apprised by the Sugar Industry Labour Welfare Fund that lights have been \ninstalled in the shelter found in the yard of the community centre.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that most infrastructures falling \nunder the purview of the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family Welfare, be it community \n\n52 \n \ncentres, social welfare centres or women empowerment centres, have remained idle since the \nlast 10 years, depriving the community of these facilities.  \nI am glad to inform the House that theses infrastructures are being made operational \nsince this Government took office. The Camp La Boue Women Empowerment Centre is now \noperational since 08 March this year. Furthermore, the Richelieu Women Empowerment \nCentre is in operation since 22 March 2025. The reopening of the Triolet Women \nEmpowerment Centre is being envisaged. Other infrastructures falling under the purview of \nthe ministry will be made operational subject to the availability of funds.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member! \nMs Anquetil : Je vous remercie, M. le président. Au nom des habitants de Résidence \nBeau Sejour, je tiens à exprimer ma gratitude à la ministre pour cette rénovation.  \nLa ministre pourrait-elle indiquer à la Chambre si cette rénovation implique la \nfermeture complète du centre et, si oui, si son ministère prévoit des solutions alternatives \npour garder les habitants en activité ? Merci.  \nMs Navarre-Marie : Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, à ce stade, ces informations ne sont pas \ndisponibles. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \nRENAL TRANSPLANT – PROCEDURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/497",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 497,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/497) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to renal transplant \nprocedures, he will state – \n (a)  if same are being carried out in partnership with foreign teams or solely by local \nspecialists, and \n(b) \nthe facilities and assistance provided to patients requiring same urgently.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo:  Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, chronic kidney disease is a significant health \nburden affecting around 200,000 Mauritian patients. Presently, there are around 1,550 \npatients on dialysis, comprising around 1,500 patients in Mauritius and 50 patients in \nRodrigues.  \n\n53 \n \nAmong these dialysis patients, those who are clinically eligible and who have donors \nare given access to renal transplantation which not only result in better quality of life, but also \nensures cost-savings over the long run. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that after an eight months gap with \na number of issues pertaining to functioning of equipment and availability of consumables, \nmy ministry has restarted the renal transplant programme and two patients were operated in \nApril 2025 by a team of surgeons from MIOT Hospital, Chennai. \n My ministry has also simultaneously established a number of partnerships with renal \ntransplant surgeons comprising the Mauritian diaspora experts and non-Mauritians working \nin United Kingdom and India to impart the necessary training to our health professionals as \nwell as conduct renal transplant cases in Mauritius. These include Professor Nizam Mamode, \nwho has previously been assisting the renal transplant programme and Professor Derek \nManas amongst others. \nMy ministry is now arranging for a different team to come to Mauritius every four to \neight weeks to carry out three to four transplant cases over a period of one week. The \nforthcoming team which is expected from MIOT Hospital Chennai in June 2025, will carry \nout three cases of renal transplantation. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question that for urgent cases of renal transplant, \nprotocols are increased at hospitals level for the work-up patients and donors. The procedures \ninvolve urine and blood testing as well as radiological and cardiac investigations prior to the \nsurgical interventions. \nIn addition, the Renal Transplant Immunology Laboratory at Victoria Hospital, with the \nassistance of a team from Guy’s Hospital, United Kingdon, has been upgraded to the latest \nstandards. The nuclear medicine department is now also fully functional to carry out \nadvanced renal function test on the donor.  \nI am further informed that for non-urgent cases, kidney transplant surgery from living \ndonors in an elective procedure and needs full evaluation of both the donor and the recipient. \nMoreover, full work-up and follow-up of donors and recipients are done by medical and \nnursing staff of my ministry through the Central Health Laboratory, Metrology Units and \nDialysis Units. Therefore, patients are listed in order of priority for the next visiting foreign \nteam to carry out the renal transplantation.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member! \n\n54 \n \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Thank you. Are there any campaigns being carried out by the \nministry to raise public awareness with a view to boosting organ registration/donation? \nMr Bachoo: The Non-Communicable Diseases (NCD) Department has undertaken the \nwork and they are doing it. \nThe Deputy Speaker: With regard to PQ B/498 and B/499, in view of the absence of \nhon. Dr. Ms Thannoo, I take it that they will be processed as written answers. \nSo, now we go to B/500. Hon. Quirin! \nNEW CANCER HOSPITAL – PROSTATE CANCER – PATIENTS & SPECIALISTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/498",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 498,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/498) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the Land Research and \nMonitoring Unit set up to investigate into cases of alleged land dispossession, he will state if \nconsideration will be given to amending the relevant legislation to empower the Unit to \nprovide support to ongoing land restitution cases as highlighted by the Truth and Justice \nCommission.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed that, following the recommendation of the Truth and Justice \nCommission, a Land Research and Monitoring (LRMU) was set up in July 2019, under the \naegis of my Ministry, to carry out in-depth investigations, establish the descendancy of the \nclaimants, offer mediation in cases of dispute and advise claimants, after thorough \ninvestigation and enquiry, on the way forward for lodging of cases related to land \ndispossession. \nIn line with the recommendation of the Inter-Ministerial Committee set up in 2019 to \nlook into the recommendations made by the Law Reform Commission in its Opinion Paper \nentitled “Mechanisms for Settlement of Land Dispute”, the LRMU took over some 355 cases \nconsidered by the Truth and Justice Commission. \nI am informed that my Ministry provides an all-inclusive financial assistance of a \nmaximum of Rs300,000 to claimants who deponed before the Truth and Justice Commission \nand whose cases, after investigation by the LRMU, can be lodged in Court.  \nIt is to be highlighted that the investigations being undertaken by the LRMU are very \ncomplex and time-consuming. I have had several meetings with the officers of the unit and I \nintend to come forward with proposals, including a new legislative framework if required, to \nreview the functioning of the LRMU. \n \nCONTRACTUAL WORKERS – CONTRACT DURATION – MEASURES \nENVISAGED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/499",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 499,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/499) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to contractual \nworkers, he will state if he has been made aware of work contracts of eleven months’ \nduration being offered thereto and, if so, indicate the measures being envisaged in relation \nthereto. \n\n129",
      "answer": "Reply: My Ministry is not aware of the number of work contracts of 11 months or less \nbeing offered to contractual workers as there is no legal obligation on an employer to inform \nmy Ministry when it enters into a contract of fixed duration. \nThe general rule is that a worker has the right to permanent employment and the \ncontract should be of indefinite duration. \nHowever, an employer may enter into an agreement with a worker for a specified \nperiod of time in relation to the temporary needs of employer under section 13(1) of the \nWorkers’ Rights Act. \nThe specific circumstances for such agreement are as follows – \n(a) \nfor the performance and completion of a specific piece of work which is \ntemporary and non-recurring; \n(b) \nin respect of any work or activity which is of a temporary, seasonal or short-term \nnature or short-term work arrangements that are normally project-related and \naligned to changes in the product market; \n(c) \nin replacement of another worker who is on approved leave or suspended from \nwork; \n(d) \nfor the purpose of providing training to the workforce; \n(e) \nfor a specific training contract, or  \n(f) \nin accordance with the specific work or training scheme set up by the government \nor a statutory body for a determinate duration. \nThere are already a number of provisions under the workers’ Rights Act to prevent \nabuse of fixed term contract. In particular, a worker who is employed in a position which is \nof a permanent nature should not be employed on a fixed term contract. \nWhere my Ministry receives a complaint from a worker to the effect that he has been \noffered a contract of fixed duration for a position which is of a permanent nature, my \nMinistry shall enquire into the matter. Pursuant to section 121(1) of the Workers’ Rights Act, \nwhere following enquiry, my Ministry has reasonable grounds to believe that the employer \nhas not complied with the Act, a notice of compliance may be served to the employer. \nThe employer can challenge the compliance notice in Court and the Supervising Officer \ncan also apply to Court for a compliance order. \nIt is an offence for an employer not to comply with a compliance notice which has been \nconfirmed by Court.  \n \n\n130 \n \nPRE-PRIMARY SCHOOLS – GRANT-IN-AID SCHEME – CARERS & \nALLOWANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/500",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 500,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/500) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to prostate cancer, he will \nstate the – \n(a) \nnumber of patients thereof who are currently on treatment at each regional \nhospital and at the New Cancer Hospital, respectively, indicating the number of \nurologists and oncologists posted thereat, and \n(b) \nnumber of deaths registered as a result thereof since the year 2000 to date.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed that all prostate cancer patients in Mauritius are referred to the New Cancer Centre \nfor treatment. The number of patients with prostate cancer registered in the department of \noncology at the New Cancer Centre from 2020 to date is 714. \nI am further informed that there are currently 12 medical oncologists and one \nhaematological oncologist that is, doctor who deals with blood cancers for example; \nleukaemia posted at the New Cancer Centre. The latter also attends regional hospitals to \nconduct follow up on patients who have completed their treatment on blood cancers. I am \nalso informed that there are around 10 experienced and trained general surgeons with urology \nskills posted in all regional hospitals and New Cancer Centre for the surgical management of \nprostate cancer. \nConcerning part (b) of the question, as all other non-communicable diseases, the burden \nof cancer, particularly prostate cancer have increased over the years. The mortality incidence \nratio of prostate cancer has decreased over time, indicating that less patients are dying of the \ndisease compared to the new cases being diagnosed. This is due to a better cancer care \nmanagement including early diagnosis and fast and modern therapeutic services. \n\n55 \n \nAccordingly, for the period 2000 and 2024, 1731 deaths have been registered in relation \nto prostate cancer. I wish to inform the House that yesterday, I met a group on oncological \nsurgeon from Max Super Hospital and I will also be receiving a group of surgeons from Birla \nHospital on Thursday morning regarding their willingness to assist in oncology surgery \ntraining and bilateral collaboration between India and Mauritius as well as in the proposed \nsetting up of a urology department in Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that my Ministry will leave no \nstone unturned in our fight against prostate cancer. My Ministry has implemented targeted \nhealth sensitisation campaigns to address modifiable risk factors of prostate cancer focusing \non diet, smoking, obesity and physical activity.  \nIn addition, public education initiatives are also being held with a view to promoting a \nbalanced diet rich in fruits and vegetables so as discouraging excessive consumption of red \nand processed meats. Furthermore, community-based programmes are also ongoing to \nencourage regular physical activity through wellness clubs and local fitness initiatives and to \ncombat obesity through nutritional counselling in primary health centres and routine body \nmass index monitoring. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Quirin! \nMr Quirin: M. le président, peut-on savoir quels sont les traitements actuellement qui \nsont recommandés aux patients qui sont atteints d’un cancer de la prostate dans les hôpitaux \nrégionaux et aussi au New Cancer Centre ? \nMr Bachoo: I have just mentioned, normally whenever we get such cases, we \nrecommend the patients to the New Cancer Centre and I can assure the hon. Member that we \nare trying to bring in additional equipment in order to serve those patients and the regional \nhospitals are also looking after prostate cancer but cases which have arrived at an advanced \nstage, these are looked into at the National Cancer Centre. \nMr Quirin: M. le président, une autre question. Vu le nombre croissant de cas détectés \nde cancer de la prostate à un stade avancé – le ministre ne pense-t-il pas – il en a parlé dans sa \nréponse de campagne, de communication mais ce que je veux dire moi ce sont des campagnes \nà intervalles réguliers pour sensibiliser, conscientiser principalement les hommes à partir de \nla d’âge de 45 à 50 ans à effectuer le test PSA. Beaucoup ne sont pas au courant, beaucoup ne \nsavent pas qu’à partir d’un certain âge, il faut effectuer le test PSA pour savoir si on est \natteint de la maladie ou quel est le degré de cancer de la prostate. \n\n56 \n \nMr Bachoo: That is the reason why we have given a new turn to the NCD Unit which \nhas undertaken that work. I know it is not an easy job but we have started it already and I can \nassure the hon. Member that we are going to expand our activity to sensitise the entire \npopulation on the danger of having such a disease. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question. \nMr Quirin: M. le président…. \nThe Deputy Speaker: This question has already been answered.  \nThe hon. Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \nPERSONS WITH DISABILITIES – EMPLOYMENT – AUDIT EXERCISE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/501",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 501,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/501) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \nwhether, in regard to the employment of persons with disabilities, he will state if his Ministry \nhas carried out an audit exercise to ascertain compliance by companies with their legal \nobligation to have at least three percent of their workforce with persons with disabilities and, \nif so, indicate the – \n(a) \noutcome thereof, and \n(b) \nactions, if any, being envisaged against defaulters.",
      "answer": "Mr Subron: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me first thank the hon. Member for this timely \nquestion.  \nI am informed that no audit exercise has been conducted to ascertain compliance by \ncompanies to have at least 3% of their workforce with persons with disabilities as provided \nunder section 13 of the Training and Employment of Disabled Persons Act 1996 amended \n2012 for the last ten years. The training and employment of Disabled Persons Board which is \na parastatal body, operating under the purview of my Ministry, has for main objective to \nprovide training and ensure the employment of persons with disabilities. \nAccording to records available, there are only 527 persons with disabilities who are \nregistered with the board looking for an employment or training. Moreover, only a few \ncompanies that is, 900 are registered with the board.  \nMoreover, the housing and population census, conducted by Statistics Mauritius in \n2022, revealed that only 6009 persons with disabilities were currently part of the workforce. \n\n57 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have been informed that the Protection and Promotion of the \nRights of Persons with Disabilities Act which was passed last year in the National Assembly \nproposes a new modified employment quota system.  \nHowever, I would like to inform the House that I have received numerous \nrepresentations concerning certain provisions of the Act including provision on employment. \nIn this context, after advice from the Attorney General’s Office, my Ministry has chosen to \nproceed with some amendments of the legislation including, on the employment of persons \nwith disabilities before promulgation of the law.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in parallel, my Ministry is also seeking to undertake a \ncomprehensive disability pensions and benefits reforms to align with the international \nstandard in order to shift from a purely medical model to a more social model approach to \ndisability. This includes the restructuring of the current disability assessment panel so that \ndisability evaluation accounts for both functional limitations and social barriers. With this \nnew reform, there will be a multipurpose one-stop assessment. \nAs part of this broader reform, my Ministry is also working on integrating the aspect of \nemployability into the assessment process of persons with disabilities. Consideration will be \ngiven to empowering persons with disabilities to pursue a better quality of life through \nmeaningful employment. \nFurthermore, my Ministry is also envisaging to carry out matching exercises to ensure \nthat skills and potential of the persons with disabilities are aligned with suitable opportunities \nin the labour market and to partly subsidise their employment. As a result, employers will be \nexpected to actively recruit and include persons with disabilities in the work force and failure \nto do so, may entail heavy penalties.  \nThis qualitative measure also takes into consideration the relative scarcity of labour in \nMauritius. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to underline that the above-mentioned \nreforms are being envisaged in the Budget Proposal 2025-2026. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Ms Daureeawo! \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Is the hon. Minister considering an audit exercise to ascertain \ncompliance or non-compliance by companies? \nMr Subron: Because of the reform, we will proceed with the reform and then evaluate \ncompliance to the new legal framework. \n\n58 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River \nSouth East. \nBEL AIR, NEW MINI-TRAFFIC CENTRE – AMENITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/502",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 502,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/502) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether in regard to the new mini-Traffic Centre at \nBel Air, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the District Council of Flacq, \ninformation as to the – \n(a) \nscope of works and estimated cost thereof; \n(b) \nexpected completion date thereof, and \n(c) \nbus routes the traffic centre will serve.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to provide the House with the following \ndetails/information regarding the mini-market, mini-traffic centre at Bel Air. The project \ncomprises the construction of a modern mini-traffic centre equipped the following facilities – \n(i) \nA passenger terminal with waiting areas, ticketing booths and washroom; \n(ii) \nFive covered and lit bus stations; \n(iii) \nBus platforms; \n(iv) \nParking base for bus and taxi; \n(v) \nPedestrian access routes, and \nAssorted infrastructure, including lighting signage, drainage system, landscaping and a \nsecured perimeter fencing and CCTV monitoring camera. \nThe project was awarded to Keep Clean Ltd for a total contract value of Rs68 million, \nincluding VAT, after an open national bidding exercise concluded in November 2024. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, concerning part (b) of the question, the site was handed over \nto the contactor on 09 April 2025 and the construction works started on 24 April 2025. The \ncontractual duration is 360 days with expected completion date being 19 April 2026. A 365-\nday detectability period will follow project completion. The works are being supervised by a \ntechnical team from the Ministry of National Infrastructure. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, concerning part (c) of the question, the mini-traffic centre is \ndesigned to support the following bus routes through its five designated the stations – \n\n59 \n \n(i) \nBel Air-Flacq to SAJ Hospital; \n(ii) \nBel Air-Central Flacq to Port Louis; \n(iii) Bel Air-Mahebourg; \n(iv) Bel Air-Quartier Militaire to Rose Hill, \n(v) \nBel Air to Curepipe. \nThank you. \nMr Baboolall: In relation to bus routes, can the hon. Minister look into it as Trou d'Eau \nDouce is on the outskirt and no transport is available there? \nMr Woochit: This project caters for five bus stations. So, for this additional one, we \nshould liaise with the Ministry of Land Transport. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. \nThe hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière! \nJEUX INTER COLLÈGES – 2025 ORGANISATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/503",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 503,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/503) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Jeux Inter Collèges, he will state – \n(a) \nthe dates for the holding of the competitions thereof for 2025; \n(b) \nthe sports disciplines and venues selected therefor; \n(c) \nif there is any change in the formula for the competitions, and \n(d) \nif the Mauritius Secondary Schools Sports Association and Physical Education \nTeachers have been consulted and involved in the organisation thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as I stated during my intervention on the \nGovernment Programme on 28 February 2025, the inter-college sports competition, more \ncommonly known as Jeux Inter Collèges, were more than just a sport competition. They \nserved as platform for discovering young talents, fostering camaraderie and instilling a deep \nsense of pride and belonging among our youth. Therefore, the revival of the inter-college \nsports competition is high on the agenda of my ministry.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the \nHouse that the preliminary of the Jeux Inter Collèges for the following regions, namely – \n\n60 \n \n(i) \nPort Louis; \n(ii) \nBeau Bassin/Rose Hill; \n(iii) Belle Rose/Quatre Bornes; \n(iv) Vacoas/Phoenix; \n(v) \nBlack River; \n(vi) Curepipe; \n(vii) Grand Port/Savanne; \n(viii) Moka/Flacq, and \n(ix) Pamplemousses/ Rivière du Rempart have successfully started on 06 May 2025 \nand will run until 17 June 2025. \nThe finals are scheduled from 14 to 18 July 2025. I am informed that some 160 \nsecondary schools, including states, private and feepaying schools have registered for the \nJeux Inter Collèges. Some 8,500 students are involved in both individual and team \ncompetition. Officials of National Sport Federation and coaches of my ministry are providing \ntechnical assistance for the smooth running of the Jeux Inter Collèges. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that the \n2025 Edition of the Jeux Inter Collèges will include the following sport disciplines – \n(i) \nFootball;  \n(ii) \nVolleyball; \n(iii) Badminton \n(iv) Table Tennis, and \n(v) \nAthletics. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the preliminaries are being held at various venues, including \nstadiums, sport complexes and secondary schools. Subsequently, the final for the football and \nathletics will be held at the Cote d'Or National Sports Complex. While the finals for \nbadminton, table tennis and volleyball will be held at the National Badminton Centre, the \nNational Table Tennis Centre and the Pandit Sahadeo Gymnasium, respectively. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (c) of the question, for this year edition, \nparticipation is open to both boys and girls in different age groups ranging from 14 to 20 \n\n61 \n \nyears old and this age group will be reviewed to include, if needed, younger categories in \nmore sports discipline as from next year. Each participant is allowed to participate in two \nsports disciplines of the competition, including one individual and one team in order to \nencourage more students to participate.  \nFor athletics, the first three athletes per event, per category and per region will qualify \nfor the finals as opposed to only two  in the previous edition, thereby increasing opportunities \nfor more students to represent their college in the final. Athletes from Rodrigues will also be \ninvited to participate in the athletic final following their own preliminaries. \nFor badminton and table tennis, the first two participants per category, per region are \nqualified for the finals. For football and volleyball, the winning team per category, per region \nis qualified for the final. \nAn overall champion of Jeux Inter Collèges will be declared based on the cumulative \npoints obtained by each college in the five sports discipline during the finals. I wish to \nhighlight that this formula has been introduced after consultation with all stakeholders. \nMr Quirin: M. le président, l’honorable ministre peut-il expliquer à la Chambre et je \nme base sur une lettre qui a été adressé par le président de la MSSSA au Premier ministre lui-\nmême, pourquoi, en effet, la MSSSA, comme le certifie la lettre, n’a pas été impliqué comme \nil se doit dans l’organisation de ces compétitions se voyant même, comme je viens de le dire, \nobligé d’envoyer une lettre au Premier ministre exprimant leur mécontentement pour \ndénoncer la façon d’agir du ministère des Sports. C’est la lettre qui le dit. Je n’invente rien ! \nEt celui de l’Éducation. Peut-on savoir pourquoi ? \nMr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as I stated in my reply, given that the Board \nof the National Council for Sports in schools and universities was not yet constituted, my \nministry provided technical support towards the organisation of the competition. I had a press \nconference on 08 January 2025 whereat the Mauritius Secondary Schools Sports Association \nwas present. \nFurthermore, I am informed that representatives of the Mauritius Secondary Schools \nSports Association were present during meeting held on 15 January and 27 January 2025 at \nthe seat of my ministry. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, at the request of the Mauritius Secondary \nSchools Sports Association, I have met with the representatives, including the President, on \n05 May 2025. We have agreed that the Mauritius Secondary Schools Sports Association will \ncollaborate with the National Council for Sports in schools and universities. \n\n62 \n \nMr Quirin: M. le président, une dernière question. Je vais, quand même, pour les \nbesoins de la question, déposer… \nThe Deputy Speaker: No! This letter was addressed to the hon. Prime Minister. I \ncannot see how you received a copy of it and how… \nMr Quirin: Oh, Mr Vice-President, please! \nThe Deputy Speaker: It is a letter between the MSSSA and the hon. Prime Minister. It \nis probably between these two parties! \nMr Quirin: You are yourself a politician!  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes! This is why I am saying this. Because I am a lawyer! \nMr Quirin: You know well!  \nThe Deputy Speaker: This letter is addressed personally to the hon. Prime Minister. \nMr Quirin: I find this very improper!  \nThe Deputy Speaker: It is a personal letter to the hon. Prime Minister! \nMr Quirin: Anyway ! L’autre question que… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you have another question? \nMr Quirin: Voilà ! Donc, j’ai compris la réponse de l’honorable ministre. Il a parlé de \ncertaines catégories, mais il y a une catégorie que les PE Teachers considèrent qui aurait dû \naussi faire partie de ces jeux, c’est la catégorie U14, c’est-à-dire, les enfants, les jeunes de 12 \net 13 ans. Et, peut-on savoir pourquoi cette catégorie n’a pas été inclue dans ces jeux ? \nMr Nagalingum: I mentioned in my reply, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that next year, we \nare going to see how we are going to include those which are not included now. We have all \nconsulted with the stakeholders and the answer is very clear! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, the next question.  \nThe hon. Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \n⁠CHILDREN – ONLINE EXPLOITATION, HARM & ABUSE – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/504",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 504,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/504) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the \n\n63 \n \nprotection of children from online exploitation, harm and abuse, she will state the measures, \nprogrammes or mechanisms, if any, put in place therefor, indicating – \n(a) \nhow the Ministry proposes to empower families on the negative impact of the \ndigital environment, and  \n(b) \nthe complaints mechanism, if any, put in place therefor.",
      "answer": "Ms Navarre-Marie: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we are all fully aware of the potential \ndanger and threat targeting our children with regard to online exploitation, harm and abuse. \nProtection of children is my primary concern and hence, I have given instructions that this \nmatter be dealt with utmost seriousness at the level of my Ministry. \nI wish to inform the House that there have been quite a number of cases which have \nbeen referred to my Ministry and to me personally. Subsequently, relevant files have been \ncompiled for follow-up, among which, a full-fledged document on a case of sharing of \nindecent photos and videos of women and girls on an application called Telegram. These \ncases have been referred for in-depth investigations to the police with whom my Ministry \nworks in close collaboration to tackle cases of abuse against children of the Republic. \nI wish to point out that on Thursday 10 April 2025, my colleagues, the Minister of \nInformation Technology, Communication and Innovation; Minister of Tertiary Education, \nScience and Research; Minister of Education and Human Resource and myself, launched a \ndraft report for public consultations. The report focuses on enhancing children online safety \nin the social media era with a view to improving the protection of children and young people \nin the digital space. Parents, educators, young people, NGOs and civil society were invited to \nparticipate in the consultation process and share their input and recommendations. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (a) of the question, as Minister of Gender \nEquality and Family Welfare, I am well aware of the negative impact of the digital \nenvironment on families. In order to address this situation, my Ministry is currently finalising \na national policy paper on the family, in which there is a component on ICT use. I also wish \nto inform the House that with a view to raising understanding on the underlying threats and \nconsequences of the misuse of social media and to empower families on the negative impact \nof the digital environment, my Ministry, in collaboration with the Cybercrime Unit, the \nCentral Criminal Investigation Department and the Trafficking in Person of the Mauritius \nPolice Force, will be conducting a two-days’ workshop on 5 and 6 June 2025 where the main \n\n64 \n \nfocus will be on teenagers, cybercrime and family wellbeing. It is also envisaged to carry out \nongoing campaigns on adolescence and cybercrime at community level.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, my Ministry has in \nplace a hotline: 113, which is operational to provide 24-hour free services for the report of \nany form of violence against children. Alternatively, I am also informed that there is a \ndedicated online reporting system in place for the report of online abusers called Mauritian \nCybercrime Online Reporting System (MAUCORS+), which is under the purview of the \nMinistry of IT, Communication and Innovation. The system is managed by the Computer \nEmergency Response Team of Mauritius (CERT-MU). It is a centralised system which \nconnects the CERT-MU, the Cybercrime Unit of the Mauritius Police Force, the Data \nProtection Office and the Information and Communication Technologies Authority (ICTA). \nI believe that online threats and dangers facing children are not only a national issue but \nalso an international one. This requires a multipronged approach and the possibility of \namending and strengthening relevant legislation is being explored. In this respect, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir, I will invite hon. Members to submit any suggestion that will further reinforce \nthe protection of our children online. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question, the hon. Third Member for Grand’ Baie and \nPoudre d'Or! \nTELECOMMUNICATIONS ANTENNA TOWERS – HEALTH IMPACT – \nCOMPLAINTS & EMF SURVEY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/505",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 505,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/505) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in \nregard to telecommunications antenna towers around the country, he will state if his Ministry \nis in presence of any complaint of the impact thereof on the health of the inhabitants living in \nthe vicinity thereof, indicating if consideration will be given to conducting a survey of the \nimpact thereof on public health.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Information and \nCommunication Technologies Authority that since January 2023, 10 complaints have been \nreceived with respect to base stations of mobile operators, including five pertaining \nspecifically to health issues. \n\n65 \n \nIn order to provide a good quality of service, base stations which constitute the \ninfrastructure that actually enables mobile phones to connect wirelessly to the networks, need \nto be placed where people live, that is, in the vicinity of houses. So, antennas or base stations \nare therefore found in those areas where people live and at times, located on the roofs of \nhouses. However, radio base stations produce some exposure to radio frequency, \nelectromagnetic field (EMF) but according to the World Health Organisation, there is no \ncurrent evidence, no empirical evidence to confirm the existence of any health issues from \nexposure to low level EMF. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the ICTA usually performs EMF surveys and measurements \nwhen a complaint is received with respect to health hazards resulting from radio frequency \nemissions of base stations. The measurement is carried out at the premises of the complainant \nto determine whether the level of EMF exposure is within the permissible limits. Here, the \nICTA applies International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Framework, \nthat limits the extent of exposure. The ICTA, in its evaluation process, applied these \nguidelines and the ITU recommendations as well. \nFurthermore, since 2012, the ICTA has also adopted an onsite measurement protocol to \nevaluate installations that are in place. And out of the five complaints that pertained to the \nhealth issues – it is good that I point out for the House that to comply to the EMF standard, \none complaint pertained to a location where the tower was not even erected and one tower, \nthough erected, was not yet operational.  \nWith regard to the fifth one – and this one is where the question actually emanates from \nand I thank the hon. Member for this question – a measurement was carried out in August \n2023 and that test revealed that the operator was not compliant with the provisions of the \nEMF safety standard. The ICTA therefore requested the operator to take remedial actions \nwhich took place few months later. Therefore, in October 2023, further to another EMF \nsurvey and the measurement that was done at the same site, the radio frequency was then \nfound to be within the permissible limits.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I also wish to inform the House that with the view of ensuring \nthat operators comply with relevant international standards with regard to erection of base \nstations, as far back as 2011, the ICTA issued to the telecommunication operators, guidelines \nwhich were termed ‘Deployment of Radio Communication Infrastructure, Technical and \nAdministrative Standard for EMF Safety’. And that was for the purpose of ensuring that \n\n66 \n \npeople are not exposed to unnecessary waves. The result of these evaluations is compared \nwith safety standards that are recognised by the World Health Organisation. As at today, the \nsaid guidelines are still in force and 1,116 base stations have been verified. The ICTA is \nequipped with appropriate measuring equipment and with a view to improving its evaluation \ncapabilities, the ICTA will be investing in further equipment. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I, therefore, take it that the survey mentioned by the hon. \nMinister is already being carried out. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Member! \nDr. Ramtohul: By the hon. Member! Thank you. \nMr Etwareea: Thank you, hon. Minister, for this answer. Will the Minister consider or \nthe ICTA consider to positively publish the surveys carried so far? \nDr. Ramtohul: Thank you, hon. Member, for the supplementary question. The ICTA is \nmanaged by an independent board. However, I will take the suggestion to the Board. Thank \nyou. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member, do you have a question? \nMr Beejan: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, can the hon. Minister inform the House whether \ntests could be carried out at planned, regular intervals to ensure the safety and health of the \ninhabitants, especially as you have mentioned, they are exposed to EMF (Electromagnetic \nfield)? Thank you. \nDr. Ramtohul: Thank you for this supplementary question, hon. Member. As I \nmentioned, the ICTA is managed by an independent board. However, because it is an issue \nthat pertains to public safety, I will take the message to the Chairperson of the Board. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Next question! Hon. First Member for La Caverne \nand Phoenix! \nMESNIL-CASTEL – OLD FOOTPATH & DRAINS – REPLACEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/506",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 506,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/506) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the replacement of old and broken \nslabs along classified roads from Castel to Mesnil, he will state if works have already started \ntherefor and, if so, indicate the – \n\n67 \n \n(a) \nname of the contractor selected therefor;  \n(b) detailed scope of works and cost thereof, and  \n(c) \nexpected completion date thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Road Development \nAuthority that the footpath and drains along the road at Mesnil and Castel, which were \nconstructed in the 1980s, are presently in a precarious state. To remedy the situation, the \nRDA is proceeding with the rehabilitation of the footpath along the affected stretches. \nAs regards part (a) of the question, I am informed that works have been entrusted to \nGeneral Construction Limited under the RDA’s Framework Agreement for Road \nMaintenance and Minor Works (2023-2026). \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that the scope of work comprises – \n(i) \ndemolition of old footpath and casting of new footpath and drain slabs along \napproximately 250 meters at localised stretches on the left-hand side of the A10 \nRoad, from Engen Petrol Station at Mesnil towards Castel Petrol Station, \n(ii) \ndemolition of old footpath and casting of new footpath and drain slabs on the \nright-hand side of the A10 Road from the junction Allée Brillant Road, B74 \ntowards Hazareesing Road, over a stretch of approximately 300 meters; \n(iii) \ncleaning of drains; \n(iv) \nrepair to drain abatement walls, and \n(v) \nprovision of concrete curbs, gullies and metal gratings. \nThe works are being implemented under two separate work orders for the sum of Rs3.6 \nm. and Rs4.3 m., inclusive of VAT for the respective works along the left-hand side and \nright-hand side. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, regarding part (c) of the question, I am informed that for \nworks on the left-hand side, the progress is about 25% and the works will be completed by \nJune 2025. As regards works on the right-hand side, same have been scheduled to start by end \nof May 2025 so as to minimise disruption to traffic and pedestrians given the ongoing works \nalong the other side of the road. The works are expected to be completed by July 2025. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question! Hon. First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix! \nMUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF VACOAS-PHOENIX – FINANCIAL SITUATION \n\n68",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/507",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 507,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/507) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Municipal Council of Vacoas \nPhoenix, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom information as to the current \nfinancial situation thereof, indicating – \n(a) \nif the budget deficit has exceeded Rs 100 million;  \n(b) \nif the pension fund for the employees thereof is also in the deficit and if, so, \nindicate the quantum thereof, and  \n(c) \nthe reasons therefor.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House regarding the factual \nfinancial situation of the Municipal Council of Vacoas-Phoenix, with specific reference to the \ncurrent budget deficit, the status of the pension fund for council employees and the \nunderlying reasons for these deficits. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, for the Financial Year \n2024-2025, the Municipal Council of Vacoas-Phoenix submitted an estimated expenditure of \nRs598.6 m. to the Ministry of Finance. The budget estimate was based on the following three \nfinancial components – \n(i) \nan expected internal revenue of Rs84.5 m.; \n(ii) \nanticipated efficiency gain of Rs65 m., and last \n(iii) \nrequested grant-in-aid of Rs449 m. from the Ministry of Finance. \nWhile the full grant-in-aid was approved by the Ministry of Finance, it is regrettable to \nnote that the projected efficiency gain, as estimated by the ministry, did not materialise. \nFurthermore, the actual internal revenue collected by the council amounted to Rs75.7 m., \nregarding a 7% decrease compared to the previous year. This shortfall is mainly due to the \noverestimated revenue forecast by the Ministry of Finance.  \nFollowing the mid-term budget review conducted by my ministry, as it is for all local \nauthorities, it was confirmed that total actual expenditure has now increased to Rs664 m., \nrepresenting an increase of 18% compared to the previous financial year. Consequently, a \nrevised budget deficit now stands at Rs139.2 m. \nThe main factors contributing to this budget deficit include – \n• \nthe payment of the 14th month salary, as legally required;  \n\n69 \n \n• \nsalary increase due to the implementation of revised wage relativity structure and \nnational minimum wage policy;  \n• \na general increase in the cost of goods and services due to inflation, and last \n• \nthe unbudgeted recruitment of 63 additional workers in September-October 2024, \ncomprising 17 General Workers, 16 Handy Workers, and 30 Refuse Collectors. \nIt is to be noted that while the Ministry of Finance granted clearance for these \nrecruitments in December 2024, no additional financial support was provided. The council \nwas instructed to absorb the resulting expenditure through the anticipated efficiency gain \nwhich, as stated, failed to materialise.  \nConcerning part (b) of the question, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in addition to the budget \ndeficit, the pension fund for the employees of the Municipal Council, administered by \nSICOM Ltd, is also facing a significant deficit.  \nIn accordance with Section 5 of the Statutory Bodies Pension Funds Act, SICOM Ltd \ncarries out actuarial valuation for the council’s pension fund at intervals not exceeding 5 \nyears. The latest valuation, as of 31 December 2022 and submitted to the council on 11 \nAugust 2023, identified a deficit of Rs348.3 m. SICOM Ltd has informed that the main \nreasons for this deficit in the pension fund are – \n(i) \nrevised financial assumptions to better reflect anticipated economic and \ndemographic trends; \n(ii) \nlower investment returns than expected; \n(iii) increase in salary and pension costs over the reviewed period, and  \n(iv) the failure to implement earlier recommendations for timely cash injections into \nthe fund has significantly contributed to the worsening of the deficit. \nTo address that shortfall, SICOM Ltd has recommended that the council should \nincrease the pension contribution rate to 24.05% and to undertake one of the following \nstructured cash injection plan, either – \n(a) \nfive annual instalments of Rs81.6 m. or;  \n(b) \nseven annual instalments of Rs61.3 m. or,  \n(c) \nten annual instalments of Rs46.2 m. \nIn alignment with these recommendations, the council has effectively increased its \ncontribution rate to 24.05% as from November 2023. Furthermore, a formal request was \n\n70 \n \naddressed to the Ministry of Finance on 12 October 2023, seeking the support for the \nnecessary cash injection. Regrettably, no response has been received to date. \nNow, regarding part (c) of the question, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this situation is not \nisolated to the Municipal Council of Vacoas-Phoenix only. Similar pension fund deficit and \nfinancial constraints are being experienced across all the 12 Municipal and District Councils. \nThese structural financial challenges are the direct result of poor planning and \nmismanagement by the previous government which diverted significant national resources, \namounting to several billions of rupees to the Mauritius Investment Corporation (MIC) while \nfailing to allocate sufficient funds to local authorities and their statutory obligations. \nAs a result, local authorities have been placed in a financial benevolent position and are \nincreasingly unable to fulfil their core mandate of delivering essential public services to the \ncitizens. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question, again in the absence of hon. Dr. Ms Thannoo, the \nquestion will be proceeded as a written answer. \nSo, the hon. Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien! \nMAHEBOURG – HARRY LATOUR STADIUM – RENOVATION WORKS – \nCONTRACT DETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/508",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 508,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/508) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to pre-primary \nschools under the Grant-in-Aid Scheme, he will state if the provision of carers is accessible to \nstudents with Special Education Needs enrolled in these schools and, if so, the allowance paid \nthereto.",
      "answer": "Reply: With regard to pre-primary schools operating under the Grant-in-Aid (GIA) \nScheme, I wish to inform the House that no specific provision has been made for the \nengagement of carers in these private pre-primary schools.  \nHowever, it is important to note that each GIA school is entitled to one Assistant \nTeacher for every 15 children. These Assistant Teachers provide support to the main teacher \nin managing the classroom, including attending to children with Special Education Needs \n(SEN). \nAs far as the Early Childhood Care and Education Authority (ECCEA) pre-primary \nunits are concerned, I am informed that, to date, 87 children with Special Education Needs \nhave been enrolled across 27 ECCEA schools. \nIn the absence of a provision for Assistant Teachers in ECCEA units, the services of 27 \ncarers have been enlisted on a day-to-day contract basis to support teachers in addressing the \nspecific needs of these children.  \nIt is worth highlighting that the post of carer does not exist on the establishment of the \nECCEA. Moreover, there are currently no trained carers specifically for SEN children \navailable on the labour market. \nI further wish to inform the House that the Grant-in-Aid Scheme in pre-primary schools \nand Special Education Needs (SEN) schools was implemented in January 2024. \nGiven the increasing demand for the admission of SEN children, particularly those aged \n3 to 5 years with autism and the fact that the Special Education Needs Authority (SENA) \nprovides services only for children aged 5 and above, the ECCEA had to adopt an alternative \nrecruitment strategy.  \n\n131 \n \nAccordingly, the Authority contacted training institutions such as True Academy, \nOrganisation Mondiale pour l'Éducation Préscolaire (OMEP), Bethléem, Hansraj Health \nTraining Centre Limited (HHTC), the Mauritius Institute of Education (MIE), the University \nof Technology, Mauritius (UTM) and the Mauritius Institute of Training and Development \n(MITD), which offer Caregiver courses, to obtain a list of trained or in-training candidates. \nSuitable candidates from among them were then engaged on a day-to-day basis. \nThe daily allowance paid to carers is Rs526.13, in addition to travelling expenses. \nAlthough the ECCEA has no formal Scheme of Service for carers, the carers are called \nupon to inter-alia – \n1. \nensure the safety of the SEN child; \n2. \nchange diapers; \n3. \nfeed the SEN child, and \n4. \naccompany child in daily classroom activities. \nWith the continuous increase in the number of SEN children being admitted, especially \nthose with autism, the ECCEA has identified the need for 13 additional carers to meet the \ngrowing demand. \nI wish to reassure the House that this Government remains firmly committed to \npromoting inclusive education at all levels, starting from early childhood. We will continue to \nsupport children with SEN and ensure that their learning environment is safe, nurturing, and \nconducive to their development and well-being. \nLAND DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN – DOCUMENT PUBLICATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/509",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 509,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/509) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the renovation works being \ncarried out at the Harry Latour Stadium at Mahebourg, he will state where matters stand, \nindicating the terms and conditions of the contract awarded therefor.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that presently no contract has \nbeen awarded for renovation works at the Harry Latour Stadium. However, the staff of the \nMauritius Sports Council are actually undertaking minor works such as, the fabrication of \nthree metal gates.  \nThe Council is also considering upgrading the fencing at the Stadium and some other \nworks are going to take place at the next financial year. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Members, the Table has been advised that the following \nPQs have been withdrawn – B/511, B/516, B/519 and B/524. \n\n71 \n \nSo, the next question, hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues \nMETRO EXPRESS LTD – LIGHT RAIL VEHICLES – WET FLOORS – \nSAFETY MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-13-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/510",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 510,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/510) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nLand Transport whether, in regard to the safety measures on board the trains, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Metro Express Ltd., information as to the measures put \nin place to prevent injury to passengers from slipping on wet floors.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Metro Express \nLtd. that the Light Rail Vehicles (LRVs) have been designed as per international norms and \nstandards with respect to on-board security and safety. All LRVs are fitted with anti-slip \nrubber flooring which complies to the European standard DIN 51130, classifying anti-slip \nproperties of floor coverings in wet conditions. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed that since the start of its operation, \nMetro Express Ltd. has not received any complaints nor any incidents have been reported \nwith respect to slipping on wet floors on board the LRVs. Nevertheless, as part of its daily \nsafety and security protocols, several measures have been put in place by MEL to enhance the \nsafety of passengers on-board of the LRVs such as regular announcements for passengers to \nbe cautious when it is raining and to hold on to the handrail and frequent mopping of all the \nLRVs at Terminal Station during rainfalls. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in addition, any spillage or wet floor condition on board the \nLRVs, are properly cleaned and dried by the cleaning service provider and regular cleaning is \ncarried out throughout the operating hours as and when required to maintain the safe and \nsecure environment for passengers. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, one question! \nMr Edouard: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have myself witnessed a case where a young \nwoman slipped on the wet floor last Wednesday and I would like to ask the hon. Minister if \nhe will consider to look at places where there is no shelter. It was raining last Wednesday and \nat places where there is no shelter, people get in with their wet umbrellas, so the floor was \nwet all through and several persons slipped. I do not know if it is really anti-skid but people \nslipped and one woman was injured and had to go to the hospital. \n\n72 \n \nMr Osman Mahomed: Was it inside the train or outside? \nMr Edouard: Inside! \nMr Osman Mahomed: Because what I am told here is that LRVs are anti-skid but then \nlike I said, it was not reported.  \nSo, the MEL people may not necessarily be aware of it but I will ask them to look into, \nbecause what I have here, it is anti-skid according to European standard DIN 51130 which is \nnot supposed to occur because it is rubber based. So, I am a bit confused. \nThe Deputy Speaker: You will look into the matter?  \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. \nMr Edouard: And at places where there is no shelter like Place d’Armes, people wait \nin the rain. \nMr Osman Mahomed: We will look into. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or! \nHILLCREST AVENUE, QUATRE BORNES – GREENING & EMBELLISHMENT – \nTMRSU RECOMMENDATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-13-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/511",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 511,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/511) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, \nin regard to the greening and embellishment of Hillcrest Avenue, Sodnac in Quatre Bornes, \nhe will state if the views and/or recommendations of the Traffic Management and Road \nSafety Unit were sought prior to embarking thereon and, if so, give details thereof, indicating \nthe actions taken thereon, if any.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS – MOTORWAY M1 LA VIGIE – \nENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/512",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 512,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/512) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to public infrastructure works \ncarried out over the past five years, he will state the number of cases where the requirement \n\n73 \n \nof Environmental Impact Assessments was overlooked, including during the construction of \nthe flyover on Motorway M1 at La Vigie, indicating – \n(a)  the actions being envisaged to avoid the recurrence thereof, and  \n(b)  if he proposes to engage and consult the civil society prior to engaging in such \nworks.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Road Development \nAuthority that in the context of the construction of new roads, an exemption, as provided \nunder sections 18 and 28 and part (b) and part (c) of the Fifth Schedule of the Environment \nProtection Act 2002 is usually solicited as the project satisfies the two criteria set out under \nthe Act, namely that the project is required in the national interest and for the economic \ndevelopment of Mauritius. \nAccordingly, the RDA proceeds as follows – \na) \na preliminary identification for environmental implication is carried out during \nthe concept stage; \nb) \nduring project development, the scope of work is sent to the Ministry of \nEnvironment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change for advice or request \nfor exemption; \nc) \nif no EIA is required, an Environmental Protection Management Plan is still \nprepared by contractor at construction stage; \nd) \nif an EIA is required, the RDA applies for an exemption under the EPA, if so \nrequired the EIA is prepared and submitted to the Director of Environment for the \ndue process; \ne) \nthe RDA seeks the necessary authorisations from the relevant authorities prior to \nimplementation and complies with the list of conditions imposed, and \nf) \nmanagement and monitoring plans are submitted to the Director of Environment. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the RDA that from 2019 to 2024, some 38 \nmajor road projects have been implemented. According to the RDA, 30 projects did not \nwarrant an EIA in line with the Fifth Schedule of the Environment Protection Act 2002 and \neight projects were EIA exempted by the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management \nand Climate Change. These projects are – \n1. \nCap Malheureux Bypass; \n\n74 \n \n2. \nConstruction of A1-A3 Link Road; \n3. \nReconstruction of Jumbo Phoenix Roundabout; \n4. \nConstruction of Verdun Bypass; \n5. \nLa Vigie-La Brasserie-Beaux Songes Link Road; \n6. \nA1-M1 Bridge; \n7. \nFlood mitigation measures at Anse Jonchée, and \n8. \nLastly interchange construction and improvements along M3-A14 corridor at \nEbene. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, regarding the construction of the flyover on Motorway M1 at \nLa Vigie which forms part of the broader La Vigie-La Brasserie-Beaux Songes Link Road \nProject, an EIA exempt undertaking was obtained from the Ministry of Environment, Solid \nWaste Management and Climate Change on 10 July 2018. \nFollowing a new government policy aimed at replacing roundabouts on motorways by \nflyovers to improve traffic flow, the proposed roundabout at La Vigie was substituted with a \nflyover. According to the RDA, this modification in design did not necessitate a new EIA \nexemption and the existing exempt undertaking was applicable. Nonetheless, an EIA report \nwas prepared by the contractor and submitted to the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste \nManagement and Climate Change only on 10 April 2025 for review. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste \nManagement and Climate Change that in view of the fact that the construction of the flyover \nat La Vigie required clearing of part of a forest, an EIA was in fact required as stipulated \nunder item 10 – ‘Conversion of forest land to any other land use’ under the Sixth Schedule, \npart (b) of the Environment Act 2024.  \nSimilar discrepancies have also been reported by the Ministry of Environment, Solid \nWaste Management and Climate Change in respect of other projects such as construction of \nthe Flic-en-Flac Bypass.  \nIn view of the conflicting reports and the seriousness of the matter, I have personally \nrequested the RDA to unreservedly consult the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste \nManagement and Climate Change prior to undertaking any major road project. Any \nexemption, if applicable, should be obtained prior to the commencement of works in line with \nthe provisions of the law. \n\n75 \n \nOn the other hand, if any EIA is warranted, the RDA shall do the needful as directed by \nthe Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to reassure the House that under this Government, our \npursuit for a modern and state-of-the-art road infrastructure will not be at the cost of the \nenvironment. \nThank you.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you.  \nNext question! Hon. Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien! \nTAXI OPERATORS WELFARE FUND – CONTRIBUTION, FUNDS & EXPENSES – \nMEDICAL SCHEME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-13-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/513",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 513,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/513) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Taxi Operators Welfare Fund, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe amount of funds collected and expenses incurred therefrom since its \nimplementation to date; \n(b) \nif consideration will be given to amending the relevant legislation to render \ncontribution thereto optional, and  \n(c) \nif a proper medical scheme has been designed for taxi operators registered \nthereunder.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Taxi Operators Welfare Fund was \nestablished on 11 June 2021 by an Act of Parliament following several requests made by the \ntaxi operators for such a Fund which could promote the advancement and welfare of taxi \noperators and their families, I am informed.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am further informed \nthat as at date, out of the 7,249 taxi operators 6,125 have already registered with the Fund and \nthe amount collected stands at Rs47,551,000. I must point out that although the Fund came \ninto operation in June 2021, payment of contributions was made effective only as from \nMarch 2022. The expenses incurred as at date by the Fund since its implementation amount \nto Rs6,238,208.32.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as to part (b) of the question – \n\n76 \n \n“Every holder of a taxi licence, other than the holder of a taxi licence who employs a \nfull-time taxi driver to operate his taxi, and a full-time taxi driver shall, on \ncommencement of this Act, be deemed to be registered with the Fund as a taxi \noperator”  \nand make a monthly contribution of Rs300 to the Fund in accordance with section 11 and \nsection 12 of the Taxi Operators Welfare Fund Act. \nAccording to section 26 of the Taxi Operators Welfare Fund (TOWF) Act the NLTA \nshall not renew a public service vehicle licence in case a taxi operator fails to pay the one-off \nentrance fee of Rs200 or the annual contribution to the TOWF as the case maybe. \nAs regards to part (b) of the question, I must point out that the proposal put forward by \nthe hon. Member may have various implications which need to be carefully examined. At this \npoint in time, no amendment is being envisaged in this respect.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as to part (c) of the question, I am informed that a Medical \nGrant Programme has been designed to provide financial assistance for medical expenses. \nThe taxi operator would need to have a valid public service licence and present a medical \ncertificate from a national hospital or a registered clinic certifying that the taxi operator will \nbe unfit for duty for at least two weeks. In addition, the taxi operator would need to be \ncompliant with the Fund and should not have benefited from the same scheme within five \nyears. \nFurthermore, I am informed that the taxi operator is eligible to a daily subsistence of \nRs389 up to a limit of Rs12,075 per month for a maximum of three months to cater for \nmedical expenses. As at date, 74 taxi operators have benefitted from the medical grant \nprogramme to the tune of Rs1,793,409. \nThank you.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you, next question! Hon. Third Member for Grand’ Baie \nand Poudre d’Or! \nWORK SECTOR – BRAIN DRAIN – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-13-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/514",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 514,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/514) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to the lack of \nprofessional, skilled and unskilled workers in the Mauritian economy, he will state the \n\n77 \n \nnumber thereof having left the country over the past five years, indicating the measures being \nproposed to address the issue of brain drain currently affecting the country.",
      "answer": "Mr Uteem: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that there is no database or record \nbeing kept at the level of my Ministry regarding workers who left or who are leaving the \ncountry.  \nBrain drain is usually driven by economic factors such a better job prospects, higher \nwages and the desire for a better standard of living. However, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the \nworld is now a global village and with the ease of movement of people, there is a fierce \ncompetition for talents. So, instead of brain drain there is rather an exchange of skills across \ncountries through both inward and outward migration. While Mauritians move abroad for \nbetter prospects, we are likewise benefitting from the services of skilled professional and \nunskilled foreign workers who are contributing to the development of the country. It should \nbe acknowledged that the movement of workers can be beneficial through remittance offering \ncurrency and enhanced skills and global experience when the worker returns to the home \ncountry.  \nHowever, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we have the duty to ensure that our citizens do find \nsuitable, productive employment locally and do not feel compelled or pressurised to leave the \ncountry to fend for their families. In this perspective, it is important to have a concerted effort \nby all stakeholders including the Ministry of Education and Human Resources, the Ministry \nof Tertiary Education and my Ministry.  \nAs far as my Ministry is concerned, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the following measures \nare being implemented to promote employment in the country and retain local talents – \n1. \nreskilling and training programmes for the unemployed in collaboration with \neducational and training institutions as well as the business community to \nfacilitate the employment of youth, women and to address the needs of the labour \nmarket; \n2. \nthe job preferences of unemployed youths are being assessed so that the necessary \nemployability enhancement programme may be offered to them to meet their \naspirations; \n3. \nwe are reviewing the legislations to ensure the best interest of workers and \npromote fairness and equal opportunities, and  \n\n78 \n \n4. \nwe are working on the improvement of the salary structure and provisions for \nbetter working conditions. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay. Next question. Hon. Second Member for Grand’ Baie and \nPoudre d’Or! \nMAURITIUS POST LTD – FINANCIAL LOSS – CONTRIBUTING FACTORS \n& SOLUTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/515",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 515,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/515) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in regard \nto the reported financial loss at the Mauritius Post Ltd., he will state the measures being \nenvisaged to redress same, indicating the factors having contributed to this situation.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I thank the hon. Member for the question. I \nam informed by the Mauritius Post Ltd. that as at 30 June 2024, accumulated losses stood at \nRs1.5 billion and pension deficit at almost Rs2.6 billion. Moreover, the latest internal audit \nreport has indicated that more than 60 post offices are making losses. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in regard to the measures being envisaged to redress it \nfinancial situation, the Ministry of Finance had on 03 March 2025 requested that Mauritius \nPost Ltd. submits a turn-around plan. The said plan has been approved on 21 April 2025 by \nthe current Board of directors of Mauritius Post Ltd. Same is now at discussion stage with the \nMinistry of Finance. \nSince the turn-around plan is under is discussions, it would not be appropriate that I \ndisclose the content thereof. However, I can mention key pillars of the plan – \n• \nIt targets review of the business model, inter alia leveraging digital technology; \n• \nGenerating new revenue streams for growth;  \n• \nHR restructuring plan with fairness in posting at heart, and \n• \nCost efficiency in operations. \nIt should be noted that the MSM administration used posting of post office as a sword of \nDamocles on the heads of people. Otherwise, there would be punitive transfer and same was \nexecuted in many cases. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I will now, with your permission, quickly give details of the \nfactors that have contributed to the downfall of Mauritius Post Ltd –  \n\n79 \n \n• Staff cost represents 83.29% of the total coast of Mauritius Post Ltd and there has \nbeen, notwithstanding its financial loss since 2020, 236 additional recruitments \nmade. This was done without any business plan review which implies that 25% \nworkforce was added without even understanding whether the current workforce \nwas adequate or not to deliver services.  \n• There is also severe competition, obviously from other companies and there has \nbeen an ascendance of emails over letters. But the Mauritius Post Ltd did not adapt \nitself to the disruption in the industry.  \n• Further, there have been malpractices that have accelerated the degeneration of the \nfinancial situation of Mauritius Post Ltd.  \nA case in point is a loss of Rs600,000 – a theft of Rs600,000 – by a subcontractor \nnamed Proguard and that money has not yet been recovered. The same company, as \nmentioned, bagged an abusive contract of Rs1.2 million per month even when services are \nnot delivered – that was actually mentioned. So, there have been abuses in terms of the \ntendering process and nugatory expenditure.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, while all this was happening the ex-Minister was still busy \nidentifying new spots for new post offices to be established, again, without an assessment of \nthe current level of the number of post offices and their services. So, this led to dissatisfaction \nof customers and employees. A full revamping of the situation, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, is \ntherefore imperative and I am sure the new Board, as appointed, will do the needful. Thank \nyou. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. You have one supplementary? Yes. \nMr Beejan: Can the hon. Minister inform the House whether proper tendering \npractices have been followed as per public sector procurement guidelines or those approved \nby the Board, with respect to telecommunication services that Mauritius Post Ltd. uses. \nDr. Ramtohul: Thank you, hon. Member for this supplementary question. There have \nbeen cases where the practices are a little bit grey in the sense that when once a tender is \napproved, there have been changes even in the supplier or there has been a split of the \ncontract after allocation of the contract and this has been done by the finance department. \nTherefore, the Board, once appointed, will look into this matter and actions will be taken \nwhere they need to be taken. Thank you. \n\n80 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. With regard to PQ B/517, hon. Duval is not in the \nHouse so, we will have it as a written answer.  \nNext question. Hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes! \nMTPA – INTERNATIONALE TOURISMUS-BÖRSE BERLIN – COST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/516",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 516,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. B/516) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Tourism whether, in regard to tourism promotion, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Mauritius Tourism Promotion Authority, information as to the cost \nincurred for the Mauritius stand at the Internationale Tourismus-Börse Berlin travel trade \nshow for each of the year since 2019 to 2024 and since January 2025 to date.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nJEEWOONARAIN LANE, PALMA, QUATRE BORNES – KINDERGARTEN – \nSAFETY MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-13-may-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/517",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 517,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/517) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the Land \nDrainage Master Plan, he will state where matters stand as to the proposition to making the \ndocument public.",
      "answer": "Reply: Making the report of the Land Drainage Master Plan public is a long \noutstanding issue which has been delayed by the previous government.  \nSince the finalisation of the report in May 2022, the then government agreed to the \nproposals contained in the Land Drainage Master Plan report in July 2022. An Inter-\n\n132 \n \nMinisterial Committee was set up under the chair of the then Deputy Prime Minister and \nMinister of Housing and Land Use Planning, Minister of Tourism. The committee was \nsupposed to look into all the implications in terms of review of legislation, specific conditions \nto be imposed in relation to construction in ‘No Go Zone’ or ‘No Expansion Zone’, amongst \nothers.  \nFollowing the recommendation of the Inter-Ministerial Committee, the Land Drainage \nAuthority was requested to come up with a revised report summarising the proposals \ncontained in the Master Plan, which excluded all recommendations relating to ‘No Go Zones’ \nand ‘No Expansion Zones’. \nThe previous government took note of an adapted version of the Master Plan on 02 \nDecember 2022 wherein it was agreed that yet another Inter-Ministerial Committee be set up. \nThe committee under the chair of the then Vice Prime Minister, Minister of Local \nGovernment and Disaster Risk Management was tasked to look into issues that were \ncropping up with the implementation of the recommendations in the plan and come up with \nmeasures to address same. This committee did not meet even once.  \nIt was only in May 2024 that the previous government decided that the Inter-Ministerial \nCommittee chaired by the then Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Housing and Land \nUse Planning, Minister of Tourism would meet to determine which part of the plan could be \nreleased to the public. It is to be deplored, once again, that the said Inter-Ministerial \nCommittee never met, in spite of the seriousness of the issue.  \n  1.5 million Euro has been spent for the preparation of the Master Plan which caters \nfor measures, projects, recommendations to not only mitigate the effects of flooding and \nprevent destruction of properties including buildings, vehicles amongst others, but also most \nimportant preventing loss of life. Here we can see the laxism and lightness with which critical \nissues were being taken by the previous government. \n This is least to say a care free and ‘fiche pas mal’ attitude adopted by the previous \nMinisters including the then Deputy Prime Minister and the then Vice Prime Minister who \nwere trusted to chair the two Inter-Ministerial Committees. \nThese two Inter-Ministerial Committees set up to look into the issues were \nunproductive and had no outcome. \n This is yet another blatant example of how the previous government was functioning \nunder the leadership of the previous Prime Minister. \n\n133 \n \nLast year, even before the elections, L’Alliance du Changement announced in its \nelectoral manifesto, that the Land Drainage Master Plan report will be made public which \nwas reaffirmed in the Government Programme as at paragraph 60.  \n As a responsible government, Cabinet took note of the recommendations of the plan \non 07 February 2025 following which we have agreed that a Technical Committee \ncomprising of various Ministries be set up to review the Master Plan prior to the document \nbeing made public. The Technical Committee which has already started it assignment since \n14 March 2025 has been allocated a timeframe of three months to submit its report. \n \nCOTEAU RAFFIN, LE MORNE, BAMBOUS – IRREGULAR WATER \nSUPPLY – REMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/518",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 518,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/518) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the kindergarten located along \nthe roadside at Jeewoonarain Lane, Palma at Quatre Bornes, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes, information as to whether \nconsideration will be given for the installation of fencing and the provision of lighting \nfacilities thereat for the safety of the users thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to the question on fencing and \nlighting facilities at Jeewoonarain children playground, I wish to inform the House as follows \n–  \n• The existing chain linked fencing was dismantled in November 2024 due to \nsevere rusting.  \n• The Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes has approved the replacement with a \nmore secured fencing fence.  \n• Installation works including new poles and repainting of the boundary wall are \nalready ongoing and are expected to be completed by the end of May or early \nnext month 2025. \nAs for lighting, no prior provision had been made. However, following a formal request \nfrom my Ministry, the Council is considering the installation of two lighting points after the \napproval at its next meeting. These lighting works are also planned to be completed by early \n\n81 \n \nJune 2025. The total estimated cost for fencing, wall repainting and lighting is approximately \nRs160,000. My Ministry is closely monitoring the project to ensure timely completion. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Ms Anquetil! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, M. le président. Would the hon. Minister inform the \nHouse what immediate safety measures have been taken while fencing and lighting works are \npending and which contractor has been assigned to carry out these works? Thank you. \nMr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, to ensure children safety during the fencing and \nlighting works, the Municipal Council welfare department conducts regular site inspections to \nmaintain the safety and cleanliness. The maintenance works are being carried out by the \nCouncil in-house and no external contractor has been appointed. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Last one. \nMs Anquetil: Last one. Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Would the hon. Minister \ninform the House when was the Jeewoonarain children playground inaugurated and why were \nlighting facilities not installed at that time to ensure the safety of the children using the space? \nThank you. \nMr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Jeewoonarain children playground was \ninaugurated in 2016 and at that time no lighting facilities were installed and for nine years no \naction was taken to address this safety concern. This shows a lack of planning and attention \nto safety standards by the previous government. \nIn contrast, my Ministry has now formerly requested the installation of lighting and the \nMunicipal Council is actively considering adding two lighting points to ensure the safety and \nsecurity of the children and the family using that playground. \nThe Deputy Speaker: I am sure the Council will look into it as a priority. The next \nquestion hon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet! \nNORTHERN COASTAL REGIONS – COASTAL EROSION – STUDY, \nFINDINGS & ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/519",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 519,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/519) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in \nregard to coastal erosion in the northern coastal regions, he will state if any study has been \ncarried out thereon and, if so, indicate the – \n\n82 \n \n(a) \nfindings thereof, and \n(b) \nactions being taken or envisaged to address and/or mitigate same and the \nexpected time frame for the implementation thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE ALLIANCE FLAGSHIP INITIATIVE – EU GRANT – \nCLIMATE-SMART AGRULTURAL PROJECTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/520",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 520,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/520) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard \nto the grant of over Rs 50 million from the European Union under the Global Climate Change \nAlliance Flagship Initiative for climate smart agriculture projects, he will state the – \n(a) \nactions and initiatives being undertaken by the relevant stakeholders thereunder, \nand \n(b) \nthe status of each of the project being implemented thereunder, indicating – \n(i) \nthe outcomes and results achieved to date, and \n(ii) \nif a monitoring and evaluation mechanism has been put in place to \nassess the impact and effectiveness thereof.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I will seek your indulgence and that of the House \nbecause the reply is rather lengthy.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the European Union has under its Global Climate Change \nAlliance Plus (GCCA+) Flagship initiative entitled ‘Supporting Climate Smart Agriculture’ \nfunded EUR 2.4 million, approximately Rs 120 million for the period 2016-2020 to support \nclimate smart agriculture in Mauritius. \nThe projects aimed at increasing the resilience of smallholders to climate change by \nimproving their capacity towards developing and sustaining climate smart agriculture \npractices. The project was broken down into four grant contract actions to be implemented by \ndifferent institutions, namely – \n(a) \nThe University of Mauritius for the transformation of Belle Mare into a Climate-\nSmart Agriculture village for climate resilience, food security, and poverty \nalleviation of its farmers. The project basically used a research approach to \ntransform Belle Mare coastal area with high production of onion, tomato and \nother cash crops on sandy soil into a Climate-Smart Agriculture village with \n\n83 \n \ninnovative techniques of irrigation to be adopted to address water shortage at the \ncost of EUR 301,695;  \n(b) \nThe Mauritius Chamber of Agriculture for the transition towards agroecological \nclimate-resilient food cropping systems in Mauritius, a research-based project, \nwhich involves networking of vegetable growers, diagnosis of current cropping \nsystems, innovation tracking, theoretical formalisation of agroecological systems, \nimplementation of redesigned systems and assessment and knowledge \ndissemination at a cost of EUR 393,410; \n(c) \nThe Commission of Social Security (Rodrigues Regional Assembly) for the \nadaptation of smallholder farmers to climate change in Rodrigues with the setting \nup of an integrated organic chilli farm at Montagne du Sable and a lime and \nhoney farm at Anse Ali at the cost of EUR 1,000,000. The goals of this project in \nRodrigues were, inter-alia, to train 43 beneficiaries on sustainable agricultural \nand management practices under Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) guidelines, \nrehabilitate 10 hectares of land at Montagne du Sable and 3.25 hectares at Anse \nAli through terracing, ploughing, and fencing. \nThe project also involved the establishment of plant nurseries, pastures, \nagroforestry and compost pads at the sites, setting up rainwater harvesting \nstructures, storage tanks and drip irrigation systems and purchase beehives, small \nruminants, lime and chilli plantlets for the beneficiaries. \n(d) \nThe Irrigation Authority for Improving Resilience of Small Holders to the effect \nof climate change through the adoption of new irrigation techniques in the driest \npart of the northern region of Mauritius at the cost of EUR 565,870.40. \nThe project consists mainly of – \n(i) \nprocurement of 4WD double cab vehicles for effective implementation of \nfield activities;  \n(ii) \nappointment of a consultant (Expert in climate change with expertise in \nagriculture) to implement the actions defined under the project. I was told \nthat the services of the Consultant were not enlisted as it was not needed. \n(iii) Implementation of resilience irrigation infrastructure on existing three drip \nirrigation projects and sheltered farming/rain harvesting as a pilot project. \n\n84 \n \n(iv) Capacity building of the Irrigation Authority’s technicians and smallholders \ncovering climate change and its impact on agriculture, understanding \nweather patterns and the impact on farming, climate change adaptations \nstrategies and climate smart agriculture practices, and advantages and \ndisadvantages of the swapping to sheltered farming. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, the University of \nMauritius has achieved the following – \n(i) \nOver 300 planters have been sensitised about climate change and climate smart \nagriculture practices through face-to-face training sessions, in-situ demonstrations \nand provision of a simple, easy to understand booklet in Creole and English, and \nvideo on the CSA practices (climate smart agriculture). \n(ii) \nThe project also develops a document entitled ‘Creating and Enabling \nEnvironment for Climate Smart Agriculture in Mauritius,’ which included a \ntraining booklet and a video on climate smart agriculture for small vegetable \ngrowers.  \nNow, if the above is implemented at national level, the enabling environment that \nwould thus be created would contribute considerably in encouraging a large number of \nvegetable planters in the Republic of Mauritius to adopt climate smart agriculture. \nOfficial figures on sales of pesticides and fertilisers to planters obtained from the \nMauritius Agriculture and Marketing Corporative Federation from the start of the project till \nits completion showed a steady reduction in the number of fertilisers, ranging from degrees of \n55% to 100 % for different fertilisers, and synthetic pesticides ranging from 46% to 62% for \nthe different products. An increase by 247% in the amount of bio fertilisers and bio products \ndemanded by the planters from Belle Mare and neighbouring areas, as a direct result of the \nproject. Of course, due to constant monitoring by the European Union also. \nNow, with regard to the project implemented by the Chamber of Agriculture, I am \ninformed that Rs7.5 million of various equipment has been provided to producers to help \nthem in this transition. Training and accompanying measures have been provided to 150 \ntrainees with regard to the reduction in pesticide used.  \nSuccessful networking of planters was created for various strategies to be adopted such \nas mulching, beneficial plants, composting, sanitation, push-pull techniques and equipment \nlike shredders, insect nets and weeders were tested on the monitored farm. Field visits and \nfrequent meetings were organised to promote the exchange of experiences. \n\n85 \n \nThe record books of the farmers help to produce useful economic and technical \nreferences for sharing experiences. The economic performance of 29 vegetable growers, total \nand marketed yield, costs of seeds, pesticides, fertilisers, labour wages, fuel costs and sale \nprices from marketing gardening systems with sustainable practices was evaluated. The main \nresult was a 57 average reduction in total fungicides, herbicides and insecticides input across \nseven crops, with insecticides decreasing by 78% on cabbage and herbicide being reduced by \n90% on pumpkin. \nRegarding the project implemented on the Rodrigues Regional Assembly, I am \ninformed that the following has been achieved – \n(i) \nInfrastructure (irrigation, stable, processing house) implementation has been \nrealised in 2022/2023, but some still has to be finalised as drip irrigation. Rain \nharvesting basins for irrigation have also been installed.  \n(ii) \nFurthermore, various outcomes have been obtained: the production of honey and \nlime trees at Anse Ali started around December 2023, the production of vegetable \nand sheep started at Montagne du Sable in January 2024.  \n(iii) The training of beneficiaries in climate smart agriculture practices have been \ncompleted. \nNow, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in terms of outputs, substantial investment has been \nmade in the realisation of project for two farms where 43 persons from vulnerable households \nobtained training to produce and acquire income. The main infrastructure includes, amongst \nothers, access roads, fencing, rainwater harvesting structures, storage tanks and some drip \nirrigation set up. Besides, goat pens have been constructed at Montagne du Sable and 30 \nbeehives have been set up at Anse Ali, including processing equipment. \nThe Rodrigues Project has promoted several concrete examples of climate smart \nagriculture practices. These include agroforestry through the planting of trees as windbreaks. \nThe aim is to plant two ha of trees to set up an agroforestry farm over two ha at Anse Ali, and \nintegrate lime cultivation with forest trees. Other practices include crop diversification, drip \nirrigation for water-use efficiency and rainwater harvesting together with composting \nresidues and sheep dung for green manure. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, regarding the project implemented by Irrigation Authority, \nwhich falls under the purview of the Ministry of Agro-Industry, was co-financed by the \nEuropean Union which contributed up to 80% of the funding amounting to Euro 568,870, that \nis, approximately Rs28 million and the remaining 20%, that is, approximately Rs7 million by \nthe Government. \n\n86 \n \nI am informed by the Irrigation Authority that except for component on sheltered \nfarming, all the other components were successfully implemented. The reason for same was \ndue to unsuccessful procurement exercise on four occasions whereby on each occasion, the \nprice quoted by bidders was far above the cost estimates specified by EU in its contract which \ncould not be changed. This resulted in the Board of the IA deciding that this component be \nshelved and this amount EUR 146,500 was, of course, not used. \nFurthermore, the EU recommended that no consultancy services be sought, given the \nunique experience of the IA and its technicians. The consultancy was therefore done in-house \nand the respective funds were reallocated for the purchase of equipment. After the completion \nof the project in September 2023, an amount of approximately EUR207,000, which includes \nthe amount mentioned earlier for sheltered farming component and EUR60,500 from savings \nmade on the other components was refunded to the EU on September 2024. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, a comprehensive impact assessment analysis was conducted by \nIrrigation Authority which demonstrated that the EU-funded project yielded a multitude of \nsignificant benefits. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (c) of the question, I am informed that the EU \nprepared an evaluation report of the consultation with stakeholders. The main purpose of the \nevaluation is to present the findings, conclusions, lessons learnt and recommendations of \nexternal and independent evaluation of the GCCA+ as implemented. \nThe evaluation report’s main aim is to inform the Government of Mauritius, the project \nimplementing agencies and the EU delegation in Port Louis about the achievements, but also \nshortcomings from the projects implemented. The IA has implemented a monitoring and \nevaluation framework as required by EU to assess the impact of this project. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, since January the ministry is placing a high premium on \nstakeholder engagement. Feedback is actively being solicited and incorporated into impact \nassessment through regular meetings and consultations with planters and their cooperative \nsocieties. This participatory approach ensures that the project accounts are aligned with the \nneeds and priorities of planters. Furthermore, the Ministers have through consultation,… \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Time is over! \nDr. Boolell: …in the light of the next budget… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Can you please… \n\n87 \n \n(Interruptions) \nDr. Boolell: …the measures are being identified to tackle the concerns of… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Can you please conclude? \nDr. Boolell: …small planters to address the issue affecting the crops, sugar, livestock \nproduction in Mauritius.  \nI thank you very much. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you! \n(Interruptions) \nThank you, hon. Minister for your long and comprehensive answer! Let me remind you \nthat you have another statement to make in a few minutes. \n(Interruptions) \nYes, time is over! The Table has been advised that PQs B/466, B/525 and B/526 have \nbeen withdrawn. \nHon. Prime Minister! \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \n The Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I beg to move that all the business on \ntoday’s Order Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10.   \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded.   \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Dr. Boolell! \nSTATEMENT BY MINISTER \nROSE BELLE SUGAR ESTATE – BOARD OF DIRECTORS – FINANCIAL \nSITUATION \n(4.11 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries (Dr. A. Boolell): Thank you very much, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. With your permission, I wish to \nmake a Statement with regard to the Rose Belle Sugar Estate.  \n\n88 \n \nRose Belle Sugar Estate (RBSE) was set up in 1973 through an Act of Parliament \nfollowing the acquisition of the estate from Garthwaite & Ors for the sum of Rs18 million. \nThis institution has, since, been actively present in numerous sectors of the economy, namely \nsugar, food crops, livestock and energy production. \nRose Belle Sugar Estate is today in a situation of financial distress with all the leading \nindicators in the red. The last 10 years has seen Rose Belle Sugar Estate evolve from an \nEstate with more than 6,100 arpents under cultivation to approximately 1,200 Arpents in \n2024. Other auxiliary clusters such as crops and livestock have become extinct. The revenue \nstream, inclusive of cash flow, have grown into highly negative pools and thus, creating \nindebtedness. The last decade has seen a palette of mismanagement, fraudulent practices \nincluding defrauding of public funds. The Rose Belle Sugar Estate Board has failed in its \nfiduciary duty to safeguard, preserve and grow the assets of the company. Illegal and \nsuspicious transactions are present in almost all segments of the business with low \naccountability. \nThe Estate is currently generating more than Rs70 million of annual loss with an \naccumulated debt level estimated at Rs1.2 billion. The operating cash flow is consistently \nnegative and unsustainable when it comes to servicing its operating expenses which stand at \napproximately Rs177 million annually. Revenue streams have been on a downward trend \nwith various inconsistencies and unjustified expenses. \nRose Belle Sugar Estate is in a dire financial posture and is today insolvent following a \ndecade of fraudulent mismanagement coupled with irresponsible ventures and projects. The \nattributes of this overwhelming state of affairs can be summarised as follows –  \n(i) \nSugar cultivation in 2014 was in excess of 4,500 arpents whilst in 2024, this \nextent was reduced to 1,200 arpents. The rest of the land bank is today abandoned \nand generates only Rs25 million compared to more than Rs100 million in 2014; \n(ii) \nMeanwhile, expenses have suspiciously increased from Rs44 million in 2014 to \nmore than Rs180 million in 2024. This is mostly attributable to increasing staff \ncosts and bonuses at a time when operations and revenue were decreasing at an \nincreasing rate. Staff costs today make up more than 80% of income generated. \nThis is against good management practices and should have been flagged by \nauditors; \n\n89 \n \n(iii) Other expenses include, inter alia, supplies and services, fertilisers and herbicides \nwhere, after a thorough audit, it appears that Rose Belle Sugar Estate had been \npurchasing supplies for 3,000 arpents when they were cultivating only 1,200 \narpents, illustrating clear defrauding of Rose Belle Sugar Estate funds and \nmismanagement; \n(iv) Since 2018, there has been no proper accounts prepared in line with international \nfinancial reporting standards. This illustrates a clear breach of fiduciary duties \nfrom the previous Board of Directors and failure under the Financial Reporting \nAct 2004 and Company’s Act 2001 respectively; \n(v) \nThe insolvency of the Estate should have been flagged a while ago as the current \nassets of the company clearly underscore its current liabilities, that is, Rs169 \nmillion assets versus Rs550 million of liabilities in 2024.  Overdrafts have been \nemployed to service current liabilities and topped Rs1.2 billion in 2022. Assets \nhave therefore been sold to avoid bankruptcy; \n(vi) Disposal of assets, inter alia, land and other equipment, have been made without \nproper frameworks or feasibility matrices. No benchmarks or evaluation have \nbeen employed to dispose land under various projects such as morcellements or \njoint ventures which crystalised huge losses to the Estate. For instance, one ‘toise’ \nof land at Rose-Belle has been sold in 2023 at Rs13,000 whilst the benchmark of \nthe regional cadastre stands at Rs25,000 to Rs30,000 per toise. This represents an \nopportunity cost of around 70% of the normal revenue curve. This again \ndemonstrates deliberate defrauding of the funds of Rose Belle Sugar Estate; \n(vii) Related party transactions, that is, directors and other parties have acquired \nvarious assets, directly or indirectly through land reservations. This is against \ngood governance;  \n(viii) Commercial land leases have been conducted at an understated rate, \napproximately 80% discount to the market benchmark, and is today full of \naccumulated arrears. This represents around Rs97 million of undermined income. \nNo legal action has been initiated against the usual suspects. Suspicions of \nofficers of Rose Belle Sugar Estate and tenants acting in concert are factual. \nTenants such as ‘Vieux Moulin’ and ‘Plaisance Mall’ are in arrears by more than \nRs15 million without any action; \n(ix) Sale of more than 1,000 arpents, under morcellement and other projects, have \nbeen conducted fraudulently; \n\n90 \n \n(x) \nSalary increases have been effected without clear rationales and framework; \n(xi) Rose Belle Sugar Estate has been operating without professional human capital \nbut rather with irresponsible and ill-minded management and Board of Directors;  \n(xii) Debtors add up to around Rs75 million with an average age of 4 years whilst \ncreditors amount to the tune of Rs15 million; \n(xiii) Rose Belle Sugar Estate has lately engaged itself in numerous ventures with \nGibraltar Group, which is loss-making and has vested land to the latter at under-\npar rates, to the detriment of the Estate. They have even sold their head office – \nland and building – to the same company at negligible prices. These ventures, \ntogether with relevant malpractices, have put Rose Belle Sugar Estate in a \nminority position and eventually without any control of its prime land. An \ninvestigation is warranted here;   \n(xiv) \nThe debts accumulated over the past 10 years are very likely to be \nclassified as non-performing loans by State Bank Mauritius Ltd, given the \nirregular service path. Their liabilities are close to being classified as stage 3 \ndefaults, implying imminent seizure proceedings. Again, we are exposed to an \nirresponsible Board of Directors; \n(xv) This same Board of Directors did not produce and validate any accounts for Rose \nBelle Sugar Estate for at least seven years. This shows bad faith and non-\naccountability to its shareholders, that is, government mainly; \n(xvi) Asset Management practices, including but not limited to land, have been \nconducted without clear mandates, benchmarks, ring-fencing and targets. This has \nfacilitated corruption and destruction of value purposely, and \n(xvii) The morcellement project, Lotissement Rose Belle 60 Arpents, clearly shows \nhighly overstated costs of Rs350 m. versus Rs600 m. of expected income. This is \nalso a succinct indication of costs majoration without adequate tender processes. \nThe cost to income stands at more than 50%, totally out of normal morcellement \ninfrastructure rates and other costs. This is highly suspicious, and again, \nwelcomes an investigation. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the above state of affairs demonstrates that Rose Belle Sugar \nEstate is on the verge of an economic collapse, infested with mismanagement practices, \nfraudulent acts and ill-mindedness that led to defrauding of funds. The asset value of Rose \n\n91 \n \nBelle Sugar Estate has fallen by more than 70% in the last 10 years and sets doubts on the \nlong-term sustainability of the going-concern. \nA proper forensic audit together with accounts preparation is warranted. I propose to \nrefer the forensic audit to the Financial Crimes Commission. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in view of the scarcity of land available to Government, Rose \nBelle Sugar Estate is poised to be an important factor in the Ministry’s food security \nstratagem. The latter shall hence be called upon to embark on a replantation scheme to boost \ncane production, energy generation and the cultivation of food crops. The Ministry is \nworking on a turnaround strategic mandate 2025-2029 to ensure sustainability, efficiency and \naccountability. A paper will be tabled by the end of May 2025. \nThank you very much. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Members, Madam Speaker will take the Chair. \nAt this stage, Madam Speaker took the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated!  \nMOTION \nSTANDING ORDERS COMMITTEE REPORT – S.O. 2 & S.O. 73 REVIEW  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Prime Minister! \n(4.23 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move the motion standing in my name \n– \n“This Assembly resolves that the Report of the Standing Orders Committee, in \nregard to the amendments to Standing Order 2 and Standing Order 73 of the Standing \nOrders and Rules of the National Assembly (1995), which was laid on the Table of the \nNational Assembly on 06 May 2025 be approved, and that the amendments contained \ntherein come into operation forthwith.” \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Attorney General, welcome! \nPUBLIC BILLS \n\n92 \n \nSecond Reading \nTHE CONSTITUTION (AMENDMENT) BILL (NO. X of 2025) \n& \nTHE CRIMINAL CODE (AMENDMENT) BILL (NO. XI of 2025) \nOrder for Second Reading read. \n(4.25 p.m.) \nThe Attorney General (Mr G. Glover): Thank you. Madam Speaker, I move that the \nConstitution (Amendment) Bill (No. X of 2025) and the Criminal Code (Amendment) Bill \n(No. XI of 2025) be read together a second time. \nMadam Speaker, the Constitution (Amendment) Bill fulfils the commitment given by \nthe State before the United Nations Committee against Torture. But above all, it upholds the \ndemocratic values which this Government wants to restore, strengthen and extend.  \nThe Bill seeks to repeal Section 7(2) of the Constitution, which currently allows \npunishments found in laws that were in force in 1964 – which punishments may now be \nconsidered inhuman or degrading – to remain constitutionally valid. \nMadam Speaker, in its Concluding Observations on the fourth periodic report of \nMauritius, the United Nations Committee against Torture gave its concern at the lack of \nexpress provision in our law prohibiting torture in absolute terms. It recommended that no \njustification whatsoever should be allowed for acts of torture, in accordance with Article 2(2) \nof the Convention against Torture. It also drew attention to the need for other laws, including \nSection 245 of the Criminal Code, to align with this absolute ban.  \n(Interruptions) \nI am trying to replace my hon. friend, Mr  Bhagwan here! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Committee further emphasised, in its General Comment No. 2, that State Parties \nare obliged to take legislative and administrative action to reinforce the prohibition against \ntorture, and to eliminate any legal obstacles to its eradication. Torture is the subject of a non-\nderogable prohibition. No State may invoke any circumstance, however exceptional, to \njustify it. \n\n93 \n \nAt the fifth periodic review of Mauritius in April of this year, I, therefore, informed the \nCommittee, on behalf of our Government, that Section 7(2) would be repealed. Today, \nMadam Speaker, barely a month later, we are giving effect to that promise. Yet another \nexample of the commitment of this Government to leave no stone unturned to reach our \nultimate goals! \nMadam Speaker, Section 7 of the Constitution is made up of two provisions. It bears \nnecessity, here, to read them out in extenso. Section 7 (1) reads – \n“(1) \nNo person shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading punishment \nor other such treatment.” \nHowever, Section 7 (2), Madam Speaker, states that – \n“(2)  \nNothing contained in or done under the authority of any law shall be held to be \ninconsistent with this section to the extent that the law in question authorises the \ninfliction of any description of punishment that was lawful in Mauritius on 11 March \n1964.” \nSection 7 (2) thus creates a broad exception to the constitutional protection against inhuman \ntreatment. It immunises from challenge any law that was in place before independence, even \nif that law authorises punishments that are unacceptable by today’s standards.  \nMoreover, that same subsection (2) of Section 7 of the Constitution is often \nmisunderstood as a transitional clause. But its effect is broader and more enduring. It allows \nsuch punishments to be re-enacted through new laws which will then remain immune from \nconstitutional scrutiny, as long as they mirror what existed prior to independence – 1964.  \nFor example, corporal punishments such as flogging or whipping, long abolished in \nMauritius, were once lawful under colonial rule. In countries like the Bahamas, such \npunishments were repealed and later reintroduced without being struck down, due to the \nexistence of these “saving clauses of similar nature.” \nMadam Speaker, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council has examined such \n“saving clauses” in several cases, such as – \n• \nPinder v. R (in The Bahamas): where a similar clause allowed colonial \npunishments to be repealed and later reinstated; \n\n94 \n \n• \nWatson v. R (in Jamaica) and Philibert v. The State (in Mauritius): where colonial \nlaws were given immunity from constitutional scrutiny, and \n• \nmore recently, Reyes v. The Queen (in Belize): where, by contrast, the Belize \nConstitution made such laws transitional for only five years post-independence. \nEven then, the Privy Council held that where no time limit is set, the clause is not \ntransitional and its effects endure indefinitely; but these clauses, Madam Speaker, were only \nintroduced with the intention of ensuring legal certainty and to secure an orderly transfer of \npower from colonial regimes to independent ones. They were not meant to hinder democratic \nprogress of nations decades after independence. \nMadam Speaker, the Courts’ task in fulfilling their role is to interpret the Constitution \nby ensuring that its construction adapts to changing times and that all local laws of the \njurisdiction conform with the organic growth of the Constitution. This is the “living tree” \ndoctrine, as described by the Privy Council in the very old case of Edwards v Attorney \nGeneral of Canada. In that case, women were not considered to be persons under the \ndefinition of a local Act. However, the Privy Council stated that the term “persons” should be \nread broadly and preventing women to become members of the Senate in Canada was and I \nquote – \n“…a relic of days more barbarious than ours”.  \nFor the Privy Council, and we agree fully with that proposition – \n “…a Constitution should thus be capable of growth and expression within its natural \nlimits.” \nMadam Speaker, section 7(2) remains on our law books. The risk persists that one-day \nParliament could – not this one, of course – reintroduce archaic punishments and that such \nlaws would then be shielded from constitutional challenge. We cannot, as a responsible \ngovernment, allow that. This approach would prevent the interpretation of torture or inhuman \nor degrading punishment to ever evolve, similar to the definition of “persons” in Canada, \nunder the “living tree” doctrine. It would be a Damocles sword hanging over our legal order. \nThis view was in fact adopted by the Privy Council recently in the case of Jay Chandler \nv. The State (Trinidad and Tobago) 2022, where it was again emphasised that the existing \nlaws could not be held unconstitutional but Parliaments were nudged to use a soft expression \nby the Judicial Committee to repeal and amend such laws. \n\n95 \n \nRepealing Section 7(2) of the Constitution therefore, Madam Speaker, is just not \nsymbolic. It is necessary. \nI now turn to the Criminal Code (Amendment) Bill, which accompanies this \nconstitutional reform. This Bill revises two provisions: Section 245, which governs the use of \nforce under lawful authority and Section 242 which excuses manslaughter upon discovering \nadultery. \nFirst, the repeal of Section 7(2) of the Constitution requires us to revise Section 245. Its \nexisting language therefore no longer aligns with the updated constitutional standard. \nThe new provision ensures that the use of force, including lethal force, remains legally \njustified but only under defined conditions, which are – \na) \nthe defence of persons or property; \nb) \nthe lawful arrest or the prevention of an escape; \nc) \nthe suppression of a riot, insurrection or mutiny, and \nd) \nthe prevention of a criminal offence. \nThis is consistent with international norms, with common law principles and with the \ndoctrine of proportionality which is now implied in our section 7(1), soon to become section \n7 simplicites of our Constitution. In other words, even in these justified circumstances listed \nin (a), (b), (c) and (d), force must be used reasonably and cannot amount to inhuman or \ndegraded treatment or torture. \nMadam Speaker, let us now turn to section 242. Before I deal with it, let me read in \nFrench from the old Code Napoleon what that section says – \n« Le meurtre commis par l’époux sur son conjoint ainsi que sur le complice à l’instant \noù il les surprend en flagrant délit d’adultère est excusable »  \nYou would have noted that the excuse would only apply to the male and not to the female. \nThat provision, as I said, inherited from article 324 of the old French Penal Code, provides \nthat manslaughter committed by a person upon catching his spouse in the act of adultery is \nexcusable. In effect, and as per French jurisprudence, only a man convicted under these \ncircumstances would get a reduced sentence. \nFrance repealed that section in 1975. 50 years on, we are still at it here and having to \ndebate this in Parliament but hopefully this will be a thing of the past in a couple of hours.  \n\n96 \n \nAlthough Section 242 of the Criminal Code has not been applied in a Mauritian court, it \nremains on our books and it remains the law of our land. And that, in itself, presents a legal \nand a constitutional risk. It offers a blanket excuse for killing, based solely on emotional \nprovocation. This excuse lacks any consideration of proportionality, intent, or judicial \ndiscretion. And, that is problematic for at least three reasons – \n• \nFirst, Madam Speaker, it is incompatible with our Constitution. Let us not forget \nSection 3 guarantees individual rights; section 16 prohibits discrimination. \nSection 242, in contrast, is at its core, rooted in unequal treatment where only \nmale violent reaction is deemed excusable. No such provision exists to “excuse” a \nwoman who would find herself in similar circumstances and kill her spouse. \n• \nSecondly, it contradicts the general framework of our criminal law, where the \nnotion of provocation is already recognised and considered on a case-to-case \nbasis by our Judges and Magistrates every day in Court. Section 242 therefore \nimposes a redundant and rigid rule that bypasses judicial assessment and \ndiscretion. \n• \nThirdly, Madam Speaker, it is socially harmful. How can anyone look at our \nyounger generations of this country and tell them that in our law, there is a \nprovision that could “excuse’ feminicide? What message would we be sending to \nthe country where domestic violence has been left unchecked for years? \nInternational bodies have echoed this, Madam Speaker. The United Nations Committee \nAgainst Torture in 2017 and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against \nWomen in 2018 have both urged a repeal of this section but nothing was done by the previous \nGovernment.  \nMadam Speaker, I must stress that today’s reform is not being carried out merely to \nsatisfy external recommendations. It is being done because the provision is out of place in our \nlegal system and constitutional principles. Repealing Section 242 simply removes an \naberration that should never have been preserved. \nMadam Speaker, these two Bills remove provisions that no longer belong in our \nconstitutional order. They reflect our responsibility to update the law; not only and merely to \npreserve its letter, but to uphold its spirit. \nThere are, of course, more sections of our law, including some in the Criminal Code, \nthat must also be reviewed in the same spirit. For instance, we are presently working on a Bill \n\n97 \n \nto update and refine our legal arsenal on sexual offences and to better fulfil not only our \ninternational commitments, but also our moral obligations to the women, girls and boys of \nthis country.  \nFor today is but one step of many more to come. Steps which will include the giant \nstrides that the forthcoming Constitutional Review Commission is expected to make. And \nstep by step, slowly but surely like this, Madam Speaker, we will cross our government’s \nbridge to the future. \nI commend both Bills to the House. \nDr. Boolell rose and seconded.  \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: Maybe we can carry on with Hon. Leader of the Opposition, for the \nmoment. Yes! \n(4.42 p.m.) \nThe Leader of Opposition (Mr G. Lesjongard): Thank you, Madam Speaker. I have \nlistened with great care the intervention of the Attorney General. At the very outset, Madam \nSpeaker, I wish to show support to the Attorney General and the Government for repealing, \nfirst, section 7 subsection (2) from our Constitution and repealing section 242 from our \nCriminal Code.  \nMadam Speaker, Mauritius is a State Party to the Convention Against Torture and \nOther Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment which we have acceded to on \n09 December 1992. Additionally, Madam Speaker, we are also a State Party to the Optional \nProtocol to the CAT which was acceded on 21 June 2005. This means, Madam Speaker, that \nMauritius is committed to preventing torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment \nor punishment both domestically and internationally.  \nMadam Speaker, as the House is aware, the National Preventive Mechanism Division \nwas set up under the National Human Rights Commission in 2014 and since June 2015, the \nNational Preventive Mechanism Division investigates complaints which are made by a \ndetainee, and where the detainee so requests, investigates the complaint privately.  \nMadam Speaker, torture under any circumstance is a despicable act and should not be \ntolerated in modern Mauritius. Moreover, it was high time, Madam Speaker, to settle the \ndebate on manslaughter committed as a result of a spouse caught in the act of adultery. \n\n98 \n \nMadam Speaker, I also support modifications being brought to section 245 of the \nCriminal Code where it was stipulated that – \n“There is neither crime nor misdemeanour, where homicide, wounds or blows are \nordered by law, and commanded by lawful authority.” \nThis new section 245, Madam Speaker, now stipulates the following – \n“There is neither crime, nor misdemeanour, where homicide is, or wounds or blows are, \ncommitted as a result of the use, to such extent and in such circumstances as are \npermitted by law, of such force as is reasonably justifiable – \n(a) for the defence of any person from violence or for the defence of property; \n(b)  in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person lawfully \ndetained; \n(c)  for the purpose of suppressing a riot, insurrection or mutiny; or \n(d)  in order to prevent the commission by that person of a criminal offence or if he \ndies as the result of a lawful act of war.” \nMadam Speaker, despite the repeals being done today there remain for me some grey \nareas. For instance, section 78 of the Criminal Code which criminalises the offence of \n‘Torture by public official’ provides for a penalty of imprisonment for a term not exceeding \nten years and to a fine not exceeding Rs150,000. Hence, this is clearly, I believe, not \nconsistent with Article 42 of the Convention in relation to the gravity of the offence.  \nMadam Speaker, the second one is with regard to the absence of any provisions in our \nlegislations prohibiting the use of any evidence obtained by torture and other cruel, inhuman, \ndegrading treatment in accordance with Article 15 of the Convention. So, as long as there is \nno such prohibition of the use of evidence obtained by such treatments, the courts will admit \nsuch evidence secured by the police and adverse to a suspect’s case.  \nMadam Speaker, there are also, I believe some practical and other challenges.  First, a \nlack of awareness of the prohibition of torture and the contents of the Convention even \nthough it has been acceded to. There is also the perception that investigating authorities \ncontinued to look for confessions by any means to resolve a criminal investigation, and see \nthe lack or scarcity of other means to solve criminal cases such as use of scientific and \ntechnological means, and lastly, the reluctance to report cases.  \n\n99 \n \nNow, I mentioned that earlier, Madam Speaker, I do not find any necessity to introduce \nthe term ‘lawful act of war’ in our Criminal Code, especially at a time where we should be \ncondemning all acts of war around the world. It is to be stressed that we are a peaceful \ncountry and should remain so and there should not be any justification such as an act of war \nthat should be qualified as lawful, I believe, in our Criminal Code.  \nFurthermore, Madam Speaker, I can understand that the relevant authorities should be \nallowed to act if there is a riot, an insurrection or a mutiny in our country. And, Madam \nSpeaker, not only as the Leader of the Opposition, but also as a citizen of this country and a \npatriot, I do not wish to see, I make reference to that, another episode of Février 1999 \nhappening again in our country.  \nHowever, Madam Speaker, should this subsection (c) have existed back then, for \nexample, would the death of Berger Agathe have been justified? Obviously, I am not a legal \nperson but I hope the Attorney General provides some clarity on this aspect of the Bill.  \nNow, coming to subsection (b), I do have some concerns, Madam Speaker with this \npart of the Bill.  Firstly, may I ask what is a lawful arrest, nowadays? \nFirstly, may I ask what a ‘lawful arrest’ is nowadays? Is it an arrest based on probable \ncause or one based on reasonable suspicion? What kind of arrest would justify the use of \nforce that might lead to a homicide that, by virtue of this subsection, may not be considered \nas a crime? Would it not have been more explicit and unambiguous to define the use of force \nas necessary, proportionate and reasonable in all circumstances that is, no more than is \nnecessary or in other terms nor excessive force. \nMadam Speaker, we have seen a series of arrests by relevant authorities since the \nbeginning of the mandate of this new Government and by ‘we’’ I mean… \nMr Jhummun: Avan pa ti ena? \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard: Let me finish… \nMr Jhummun: Aster? ki aster? \nMr Lesjongard: and by ‘we’ I mean the people. Are we entitled to know where we are \ngoing with this kind of addition to our criminal code? Should we, as a population, be worried \nor is this leading us to a situation where we operate, where law and justice prevails? What do \nwe do, Madam Speaker, for example when a detainee or a prisoner escapes? Does this mean \n\n100 \n \nthis person deserve to die and justifiable under the eyes of the law? Madam Speaker, you as a \nlegal person, must know, self-defence is already in our law. \nMadam Speaker, that is in section 246 of the Criminal Code but what about defence of \nproperty? Are we talking about trespass? So, many questions, Madam Speaker, that I believe \nthe hon. Attorney General will clarify in due course. \nMadam Speaker, I believe that if the Government wishes to bring improvements to the \npresent laws, fair enough, I will give my support where the interest of the people lies. \nHowever, let us not create loopholes for abuse.  \nCes amendements, Madame la présidente, découle du rapport comme ça a été dit de la \nCommission des Nations Unies contre la torture qui date de 2017 et oui, j’accepte. Peut-être \nqu’il fallait se pencher dessus depuis des années… \n(Interruptions) \nMais cela ne veut pas dire que le régime précédent… \n(Interruptions) \n… ne l’a pas considéré. Quand on parle du code criminel et de la constitution d’un pays, il ne \nfaut pas procéder au coup par coup dans ce genre de situation. Ce même rapport, Madame la \nprésidente, évoque aussi le Police and Criminal Evidence Bill, un projet de loi qui a été \nlongtemps évoqué mais qui attend toujours de voir le jour. \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard: À mon humble avis, Madame la présidente, les amendements du jour \nviennent certes… \nAn hon. Member: FCC! \nMr Lesjongard: …condamner encore plus des cas de torture mais viennent aussi \nexonérer l’État dans des cas spécifiques.  \nWhere do we draw the line, Madam Speaker, as a sovereign nation? \n(Interruptions) \nMr Jhummun: Demann gel. Li pu dir twa. \n\n101 \n \nMr Lesjongard: Le rapport parle aussi de beaucoup de manquements dans les \nenquêtes de la police, par exemple comme celle concernant le décès de Monsieur Rajesh \nRamlogun décédé en détention policière le 12 janvier 2006. \nMadam Speaker, I believe in line with the recommendations of the United Nations, we \nare taking a firm stand against torture through our Constitution and by replacing section 242 \nof the Criminal Code and at the same time, I believe that we are also tolerating violence in \nspecific cases which might, as I said earlier, create loopholes for any future abuse by the \nauthorities and I would ask and request Government to trade – let us say, with caution be \ndefining the various categories of force whether physical, restrain equipment, firearms, police \ndogs etc.. but more importantly, Madam Speaker, by setting the limits of the use of force. \nMadame la présidente, nous avons aussi remarqué une dégradation inquiétante de la \nsituation du law and order dans le pays depuis le début de l’année. \n(Interruptions) \nLe gouvernement et surtout la police doit réagir afin de calmer la situation mais pour \nbut qu’il n’y ait pas d’abus.  \nNow, for example, Madam Speaker, to reduce to a minimum the risk of abuse by the \nauthorities during any operation, maybe we should consider the introduction of body cameras \nfor our police officers. This way, Madam Speaker, any arrest… \n(Interruptions) \nThis way, Madam Speaker, any arrest, any drug seizure for that matter is filmed, \nrecorded and Government, I believe, should amend the law so that those images can be used \nas evidence in Court. This way, Madam Speaker, it will be clear in the eyes of the law if there \nhas been unjustified violence or not. We are, Madam Speaker, a peaceful country and we \nshould leave no stone unturned in our quest to eradicate completely any suspicion of acts of \ntorture on our territory. I am done, Madam Speaker, thank you. \nAn. hon. Member: Good news. \nMr Jhummun: We commend the law! \nMadam Speaker: I propose we break for half an hour. Thank you. \nAt 4.56 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.44 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \n\n102 \n \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, you may be seated. \nI now call on hon. Lobine for his speech. \nMr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix): Thank you, Madam \nSpeaker. \nMadam Speaker, I rise today to give my full and unequivocal support to these two bills: \nthe Constitution (Amendment) Bill (No. X of 2025) and the Criminal Code (Amendment) \nBill (No. XI of 2025). I fully adhere to the delivery of the hon. Attorney General with regard \nto these two Bills but I deplore the banality with which the hon. Leader of Opposition has \nintervened during the debate. Completely out of context; he could not understand the purpose \nof those two very crucial amendments that are being brought to our laws especially to our \nConstitution and this is something that is unbecoming from a Leader of Opposition \nconcerning such an important piece of legislation that would bring some clarity to our \nposition as a modern society, as a modern country whereby, once again, another milestone to \nrestore our dignity, our democracy and our constitutional values. \nMadam Speaker, way back in 2017 as rightly pointed out by the hon. Attorney General, \nthe United Nations Committee Against Torture issued clear and forceful recommendations to \nthe Mauritius way back in 2017 – 8 years back, Madam Speaker. But the previous \ngovernment, unfortunately, could not even solicit debates with regard to what was the \nrecommendation of this Committee. What did this Committee say, Madam Speaker? They \nurged Mauritius to repeal section 242 of the Criminal Code which excuses manslaughter \nwhen a spouse is killed upon being caught in adultery. \nThe Committee urged Mauritius to repeal section 7 subsection (2) of the Constitution \nwhich undermines the absolute prohibition of inhuman or degrading punishment by \npreserving laws from 1964, Madam Speaker, and I quote paragraph 42 of the \nrecommendations – \n“The State party [that is, Mauritius] should abrogate section 242 of its Penal Code and \nensure that the Constitution provides for the absolute prohibition of torture or cruel, \ninhuman or degrading treatment”. \nThe previous regime failed to address all these issues, Madam Speaker. Today, we have \ngot a government together with the way that the hon. Attorney General is handing affairs with \nregard to those very important amendments that are being brought. Each and every 2 or 3 \nweeks, important amendments are being brought to consolidate our Constitution, our \n\n103 \n \ndemocracy and we are awaiting further major amendments through the establishment of a \nConstitutional Review Commission whereby each and every citizen would also be able to \ngive their views on those various precolonial legislations that we need to amend and also, to \nrevamp our Constitution after 57 years, Madam Speaker. \nSo, Madam Speaker, I would qualify section 242 as a colonial era excuse for gender-\nbased violence. This is the gist that the hon. Leader of the Opposition has missed to point out \nas a patriot. He could have, as the Leader of the Opposition, a point of view with regard to \nsection 242, which talks about gender-based violence, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker, section 242 belongs to another era. It allowed men to kill their wives \nor their wives’ lovers and then plead passion. It created a legal shield for violence, \nparticularly violence against women under the narrative of betrayal but this defence has no \nplace in a modern legal system and I would not repeat what the hon. Attorney General has \nsaid but I would just, for the sake of clarity and for the sake of the record, state the position of \nour judiciary, the Supreme Court with regard to those particular sections. \nMadam Speaker, our Courts have already began shifting away from the logic of section \n242. In recent years, judgments have signalled out that the passion or jealousy can no longer \nexcuse or mitigate violent killing. I would state a few and quote a few case laws, Madam \nSpeaker, for the sake of this august Assembly and for the sake of completeness to know how \nthese things are being treated by our judiciary and what the narratives that we now have to \nmove on, with these new legislations coming in, are.  \nIn the case of State v Takoordyal, Madam Speaker – it is a 2017 Supreme Court \njudgement case – the Court accepted a manslaughter plea after a man killed his wife over \nsuspected infidelity but significantly, the Court weighed not only emotion but also the \ncalculated and prolonged nature of the act, hinting at the limits of provocation. \nAnd again, in a 2018 case of Seegoolam, Madam Speaker, the killer claimed rage after \nwitnessing his wife with another man but the Court’s reasoning focused on the deliberate \ndisposal of the body and the accused conduct after the fact. Then, the year after, there has \nbeen a shift in the tone and principle being adopted by the Supreme Court in Mauritius. In the \ncase of Prayagsing Booshan, Madam Speaker – it is a 2019 case, Supreme Court judgement \nof 74 – the Court stated plainly, I quote – \n“Neither anger nor jealousy reduces the blame worthiness of a crime. In a democratic \nsociety, violence is not a means of resolving emotional conflict.” \n\n104 \n \nThis is a shift to what the law itself was stating and this was reaffirmed in the case of \nNelia. It is a 2021 Supreme Court judgement case 282, Madam Speaker. I again quote what \nthe Court stated – \n“Such violence cannot be further tolerated in our society.” \nAnd again, in a 2021 case of Vishnu Bungary and confirmed in the case of Jenisen \nRamen, very recently, a 2024 case Supreme Court judgement where the judiciary dismissed \nemotional provocation as a defence even in the face of remorse or psychological stress. So, \nthe shift is clear and today in Parliament, all of us are unanimous to salute the actions of \nGovernment and the hon. Attorney General to bring these two amendments but again, this \nfamous section 7(2) of our Constitution – it is a constitutional contradiction with regard to the \nvalues of a democratic society. I am of the opinion that the legality and the morality of this \nparticular section of our Constitution is untenable. And again, I salute, I congratulate the \nGovernment and the hon. Attorney General to bring this amendment and this, in fact, protects \nhuman dignity, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker, the hon. Attorney General referred to France. Yes, France repealed its \ncrime of passions defence in 1975 by abolishing article 324 of the penal code. And that was \nalso followed by Italy in 1981, repealing its article 587 which had allowed reduced sentences \nfor adultery-based killings. Other countries also, Madam Speaker, Portugal has done so with \nabolishing its article 133 of its penal code. Brazil, Madam Speaker, in 1991. The UK, Madam \nSpeaker, under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, created a new partial defence of loss of \ncontrol but explicitly excluded sexual infidelity as qualifying trigger. New Zealand also – \nthese are Commonwealth countries, Madam Speaker – abolished the provocation defence \naltogether in 2009. And in Australia, Madam Speaker, every State has now repealed or \nseverely restricted the provocation defence with South Australia completing the process in \n2020. So, better late than never. It should have been done in 2017-2018 but we are in 2025 \nwith a new Government, mandated by the people of Mauritius and we fully support this Bill.  \nAnd, Madam Speaker, when we talk about this famous section 242, we cannot speak of \nthat section without acknowledging that it has overwhelmingly shielded men who kill \nwomen. Again, vividly described by the hon. Attorney General; it has allowed rage to \nmasquerade as honour and permitted our Courts against their better instincts to reduce murder \nto manslaughter in the name of passion. By repealing section 242, Madam Speaker, in this \nvery august Assembly, we say that a woman’s life is not worth less because she is unfaithful. \n\n105 \n \nAdultery is not a provocation to violence and no one has a legal right to kill in the name of \nwounded pride. This reform, these two amendment Bills, Madam Speaker, strengthen our \ncommitment under CEDAW and the SADC Protocol on Gender and Development to \neliminate all forms of gender-based violence. \nMadam Speaker, this Bill does not just update our law; it upholds the dignity of every \nperson, aligns our statutes with our Constitution, respects international obligations and ends \nthe legal fiction that some killings are excusable because they are emotional. It also reflects \nwhat our Courts have already began to do with those latest judgements. And today in \nParliament, we shall be making history again because we shall choose justice over tradition \nand dignity over vengeance. \nI fully support this Bill. I thank you all for your kind attention. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Minister of Gender, it is your turn! \n(5.58 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare (Ms A. Navarre-Marie): \nMadame la présidente, merci de me donner la parole ce soir sur ce débat autour d’une part, \nles deux amendements qui sont apportés au Criminal Code, notamment les sections 242 et \n245, et à celui qui est porté à la Constitution de Maurice avec l’abrogation de la section 7(2) \nliée à la torture, auxquels j’adhère totalement.  \nDepuis six mois, ce gouvernement a réussi à placer notre pays à l’aube d’une ère \nnouvelle. Et, je voudrais ici rendre hommage à mon collègue, l’Attorney General, d’être venu \naussi rapidement avec ces amendements, tant au niveau de la Constitution de Maurice qu’au \nniveau du code pénal, qui, j’en suis certaine, feront date dans l’histoire de la justice \nmauricienne. Je vais d’abord aborder l’article 242 du code pénal et ensuite, l’amendement \nproposé à la Constitution. \nPendant trop longtemps, Madame la présidente, l’article 242 du Code pénal a servi à \njustifier une injustice profonde légitimant sous le vernis des vieilles traditions des actes de \nviolences qui ne sont rien d’autres que le reflet d’un déséquilibre entre l’honneur masculin et \nle droit inaliénable des femmes à la sécurité. \nAujourd’hui, les femmes de ce pays vivent un moment historique, car avec l’abrogation \nde la section 242 du Code pénal, nous tournons résolument la page de toutes formes \nd’injustice envers les femmes. Dans sa logique historique, la section 242 du Code pénal \n\n106 \n \njustifie les féminicides en offrant une excuse légale à un mari tuant sa femme en flagrant délit \nd’adultère, alors que le contraire ne s’applique pas. Or, la loi doit être un rempart inébranlable \ncontre la violence – une voix forte qui met fin à l’impunité et une réponse à celles qui ont \ntrop longtemps été réduites au silence. \nL’abrogation de la section 242 du Code pénal veut dire que tout cas d’homicide, de \nblessure et de coup infligés par un mari ou un conjoint en cas d’adultère ne sera plus \nconsidéré comme excusable. En effet, servir l’adultère comme une justification ou comme \nune excuse pour violenter ou tuer une personne n’a plus sa place dans la société dans laquelle \nnous vivons aujourd’hui. Dans de nombreux cas, nous avons tous été témoins du degré de \nviolence ignoble, voire odieux, utilisé contre les femmes. Des fois, Madame la présidente, la \nviolence est utilisée rien que sur des soupçons d’infidélité pour commettre des crimes \ninfâmes. Avec l’abrogation de la section 242, nous mettons fin à un système patriarcal de \nnotre société qui a trop duré.  \nL’histoire nous rappelle combien ces conceptions ont été ancrées dans certaines \nsociétés. William Blackstone, juriste britannique, définissait les femmes comme des chattels \nde leurs maris – des possessions, des biens privés, dénués de statut juridique ou d’autonomie. \nIl y avait the doctrine of irrevocable consent upon marriage, as stated by Sir Mattew Hale, \nwhere in his opinion, a husband does not require consent from his spouse for sexual \nintercourse as the latter is an essential part of the marriage. Blackstone shared the same \nopinion when he developed the Unity Theory. \nCette croyance, Madame la présidente, a justifié des siècles d’injustices et de violences \nsous prétexte de droit conjugal. Si cette conception archaïque a été renversée en 1980 aux \nÉtats-Unis par une décision de la Cour suprême dans l’affaire Trammel v. United States, \naffirmant enfin que les femmes sont des entités juridiques indépendantes, nous devons \ntoutefois regretter que la criminalisation du viol conjugal demeure encore aujourd’hui en \nsuspens dans tant de pays, y compris le nôtre, chez nous.  \nIl est inadmissible qu’une femme puisse être contrainte, sous prétexte du mariage, que \nl’union légale puisse être invoquée pour priver une personne de son consentement et de son \nintégrité. Nous avons le devoir absolu de mettre fin à cette ambiguïté juridique et de \nreconnaitre que toute forme de violence, y compris dans le cas du mariage, doit être \nsanctionnée sans exception.  \n\n107 \n \nMarital rape, Madam Speaker, is an issue that has to be dealt with at a later stage. \nProbably in the Domestic Abuse Bill currently under preparation. Mauritius too will have to \nmark the death sentence of the marital rape exception. I am happy that the Attorney General \nannounces a Sexual Offences Bill which will be presented in Parliament. This Bill will \nencompass, I am sure, sexual abuse on women and minors altogether.  \nMadame la présidente, la démarche de ce gouvernement n’est pas un acte isolé, mais \nune pierre angulaire d’une politique globale visant à rétablir l’égalité réelle et à offrir à \nchaque être humain et surtout aux femmes la protection qu’elles méritent. Mais cette réforme, \naussi fondamentale soit-elle, ne suffit pas à elle seule à transformer les mentalités qui, trop \nsouvent, continuent de perpétuer la domination masculine dans notre société.  \nCette avancée législative s’inscrit dans la logique de nos engagements internationaux et \nrégionaux. La Convention sur l’élimination de toutes les formes de discrimination à l’égard \ndes femmes (CEDEF) nous exhorte depuis longtemps à supprimer ces justifications \narchaïques qui ne sont rien de moins qu’un affront à l’égalité et aux droits fondamentaux des \nfemmes. Nous sommes aussi signataires du Maputo Protocol de 1995 qui, lui aussi, exhorte \nles États membres à adopter les mesures nécessaires pour prévenir et éradiquer la violence à \nl’égard des femmes. Nous devons, donc, éliminer toutes les formes de discriminations à \nl’encontre des femmes. \nGrâce à ce gouvernement, nous sommes donc entrés dans la modernité au même titre \nque des pays tels que l’Australie, le Canada et le Royaume-Uni qui, eux aussi, ont amendé \nleurs lois pour rendre justice aux femmes. Avec la présentation de ces amendements, \ndésormais, un mari ou un conjoint qui tue sa femme ou sa conjointe va devoir répondre de ses \nactes devant la justice. \nMadame la présidente, nous portons, aujourd’hui, une responsabilité immense : celle de \nne pas céder aux demi-mesures, ni de nous satisfaire de simples ajustements. Nous \nrépondons, aujourd’hui, à cet appel avec détermination et avec des amendements qui reflètent \nnotre volonté de progresser vers une justice véritablement équitable. Nous devons aller plus \nloin, réformer, éduquer et garantir que chaque citoyenne et chaque citoyen de ce pays puisse \njouir de la pleine protection de la loi, indépendamment de son genre, de son statut ou de son \nmesseoir. La confiance de la population nous impose une exigence absolue d’actions.  \n\n108 \n \nAvec les amendements que nous propose l’Attorney General et l’arrivée bientôt du \nDomestic Abuse Bill, fini le temps où certains identifiaient leurs épouses comme leur \npossession, leur bien, leur propriété plutôt que comme des êtres humains indépendants.   \n   Madame la présidente, dans cette même lignée, l’abrogation de la section 7 (2) de la \nConstitution était nécessaire parce que Maurice a ratifié les sept traités fondamentaux des \ndroits humains des Nations unies et cinq optional protocols liés à ces traités, y compris la \nConvention contre la torture. En supprimant l’article 7 (2) de notre Constitution, cette action \nredéfinit clairement notre espace juridique. Elle proclame que toute loi autorisant des peines \nsusceptibles d’impliquer tortures ou traitements inhumains est incompatible avec nos valeurs \nfondamentales.  \nConcrètement, ce changement renforce la protection des droits fondamentaux et crée un \nrempart juridique contre toutes pratiques contraires aux droits humains. Plus jamais un \nindividu ne pourra voir sa dignité bafouée sous prétexte de sécurité ou de répression, même \ndans les cas les plus graves. Ce changement améliore le contrôle et la responsabilité de nos \ninstitutions.  \nEn effet, Madame la présidente, même si la création de la Commission indépendante \ndes plaintes contre la police a été saluée par les experts des Nations unies, il est à constater \ncependant que les enquêtes diligentées par cette instance montrent que, trop souvent, les \nplaintes relatives à ces violences ne débouchent pas sur une action judiciaire ferme, laissant \nles victimes livrées à leur désarroi. \nCe problème est tout aussi grave lorsqu’il s’agit des cas de trafic humain dénoncés par \ndes ONG et touchant principalement des femmes et des enfants vulnérables. Ces situations \nalarmantes soulignent la nécessité cruciale d’un cadre juridique qui garantisse en toutes \ncirconstances que la dignité humaine ne soit jamais compromise. En imposant une norme \nconstitutionnelle claire, face à la torture et en redéfinissant la section 245 du code pénal, nous \ndotons les organes de contrôle et les enquêtes indépendantes telles que l’IPCC d’un cadre \njuridique solide pour agir efficacement contre les abus. Cela permettra de restaurer la \nconfiance des citoyens mauriciens dans notre système judiciaire et de positionner Maurice à \nla pointe des standards internationaux. \nAu niveau régional et international, notre engagement fera de Maurice un exemple en \nmatière de respect des droits humains. Le ministère de l’Egalité des genres et du Bien-être \n\n109 \n \nfamilial travaille chaque jour pour protéger les plus vulnérables et garantir que la justice ne \nserve jamais de prétexte à des abus.  \nEn adoptant ces réformes, nous faisons le choix déterminant d’une législation qui, \nmême en cas de détention, place le respect des droits de chacun au-dessus de toutes \nconsidérations. On ne peut pas tuer la vérité, Madame la présidente. On ne peut pas tuer la \njustice. On ne peut pas tuer ce pourquoi nous nous battons. En nous engageant pour ces \namendements, nous affirmons notre combat pour la justice, la dignité et le respect de chaque \ncitoyenne et citoyen, et l’opportunité historique de corriger des dérives. \nJe vous remercie. \nMadam Speaker : Merci, Madame la ministre. \nHon. Deputy Prime Minister! \n(6.12 p.m.) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, je tiens à commencer un court discours \nen cette occasion, mais je tiens à commencer ce discours en criant, pas en disant, mais en \ncriant mon indignation à un moment où nous amendons la loi suprême du pays, notre \nconstitution, pour faire des choses admirables. Au moment où le leader de l’opposition fait \nson discours - ils sont deux assis là-bas dans l’opposition ; deux ! -, l’autre n’est même pas \nprésent. Et ce même leader de l’opposition, aussitôt son discours terminé, nous tourne le dos, \nil s’en va. Après avoir dit qu’il est en faveur du projet de loi, un projet de loi qui nécessite \ntrois quarts pour amender la constitution. Monsieur, ça ne le concerne pas. Il a fini de se faire \nvoir à la télévision, il s’en va. C’est pourquoi je crie mon indignation. C’est choquant de voir \nce qu’il reste comme opposition, se comporter de cette façon en une occasion pareille. \nCeci dit, je ne serai pas long. Puisque l’Attorney General est parmi nous, bravo, et \nbravo pour le discours qu’il a prononcé en notre nom à tous. Je ne vais donc pas me répéter. \nMais aujourd’hui, c’est quand même le jour où nous amendons notre constitution pour y \nmettre l’absolute prohibition of torture. C’est un grand jour. C’est un jour qui s’est trop fait \nattendre, mais c’est un grand jour. C’est aussi le jour où manslaughter committed by any \nperson on his spouse as well as on his partner at the very moment he finds them in the act of \nadultery, will no more be an excusable offence. C’est un grand jour pour ces deux raisons, et \nje félicite ma collègue la ministre de l’Egalité des genres et du Bien-être familial pour le \ndiscours qu’elle vient de prononcer, Madam Speaker.  \n\n110 \n \nDeux grands moments pour tous ceux qui sont ici et qui sont fiers de participer. Nous \nsavons qu’à l’horizon - l’Attorney General l’a annoncé -, se profile un new Sexual Offences \nand Hate Crimes Bill, et nous trouverons le plus tôt possible, nous l’espérons tous, dans ce \nnew Sexual Offences and Hate Crimes Bill, un nouveau délit, le marital rape, qui, nous \ndevons le reconnaître, n’est pas quelque chose d’accepté par tous, parce que les préjugés sont \ndifficiles à vaincre. Mais que vienne le plus rapidement possible ce jour-là. Quant à moi, je \nn’ai pas de doute que l’Attorney General que nous avons saura aussi apporter une nouvelle \ndéfinition, dans ce texte de loi à venir, parce que la définition - marital rape is one thing - de \nrape qui est dans notre loi est complètement dépassée. Nous le ferons tous ensemble, under \nthe guidance de l’Attorney General, et nous aurons une nouvelle définition de rape. Ces \njours-ci, comme nous le savons tous et surtout vous-même, presque tous les jours, il y a des \ndébats dans la presse, dans la presse spécialisée sur la définition actuelle de ce qui devrait être \nla définition actuelle de rape.  \nDonc, je dis ces quelques mots pour saluer ma collègue la ministre de l’Egalité des \ngenres et du Bien-être familial, et surtout en ce jour tellement important, en notre nom à tous, \npour remercier et féliciter l’Attorney General pour le service immense qu’il rend à son pays \nen cette occasion. \nMerci, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Merci. \nYes, hon. Prime Minister! \n(6.17 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the two Bills we are presenting today, one for \namending the Constitution, and the other one to amend the Criminal Code, aim at removing \nexceptions to provisions in our legislations which allow torture.  \nThe Criminal Code is also amended in respect of any injustice in our law, recording the \nso-called excusable homicide committed by a man on his spouse. I will address the House in \nthe first instance on the amendments relating to Chapter II of the Constitution. \nMadam Speaker, I will not repeat what the Attorney General, the Deputy Prime \nMinister and the Minister for Gender have just said, so eloquently. These amendments are in \n\n111 \n \nline with our Government Programme, which provided for amendments to be made to \nChapter II of the Constitution to better protect our fundamental rights. \nAs the Attorney General has pointed out, section 7(1), I want to repeat it because it’s \nimportant, section 7(1) of our Constitution provides that – \n“(1) No person shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading punishment or \nother such treatment.” \nHowever, the same section, section 7(2) on ‘Protection from inhuman treatment’ – \n“(…) authorises the infliction of any description of punishment that was lawful in \nMauritius on 11 March 1964.” \nBy authorising such punishment, this section, that is, section 7(2), opens the door to gross \nviolation of human rights by an oppressive regime meant on defying universal principles \nregarding physical integrity and dignity. With these amendments we are proposing today, we \nare aligning our national legislation with the universal principles that enhance fundamental \nrights and fundamental freedom of individuals as laid down in Chapter II of our Constitution. \nTherefore, the Constitution (Amendment) Bill proposes to repeal section 7(2) of the \nConstitution completely. It is important to recall that section 7 appears under the heading \n‘Protection from inhuman treatment’ and forms part, as I said, of Chapter II of our \nConstitution. It is entitled ‘Protection of fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual’. \nChapter II, Madam Speaker, is at the very heart of our democracy. In the Government \nProgramme, we have made clear our intention to strengthen and further extend these \nfundamental rights. The repeal of section 7(2) is one step in the wider process. While section \n7(1) bans torture and other inhuman and degrading treatment, section 7(2) allows for \nexceptions to this rule. As the law stands, if that punishment was legal in March 1964, then it \ncannot be considered unconstitutional even if it is inhuman. That section was originally \ninserted as part of a larger set of transitional arrangements around independence.  \nIn theory, it was meant to provide continuity in the legal system. In practice, it \npreserved a dangerous mindset. The idea that some forms of torture could be perpetrated by \nthe State as long as it was allowed in a law of the colonial era is erroneous. As the Judicial \nCommittee of the Privy Council noted in a case from the Bahamas, provisions like these often \ncall special saving clauses allowed for colonial laws to be repealed and then reinstated \nwithout being subject to constitutional challenge.  \n\n112 \n \nMadam Speaker, no sensible government today would call for the return of corporal \npunishment such as flogging or whipping, but the exception remains on the book, as the \nAttorney General just pointed out, and its very presence weakens the coherence of our \nConstitution. Worse, it opens the door for such punishments to be reintroduced by a simple \nBill, as the Attorney General pointed out, and thus bypass the constitutional ban on torture. \nThis is why the United Nations Committee against Torture has repeatedly asked us to repeal \nsection 7(2) and to bring our Constitution in line with the absolute and non-derogable nature \nof the prohibition against torture. \nThe recommendation is clear: no justification may be involved under any \ncircumstances, be it legal, political, or historical to permit torture or inhuman punishment. \nWe are in total agreement with the stand of the Committee, and we are acting accordingly.  \nMadam Speaker, our Constitution is sacred; any Constitution, but it is a living \ninstrument not a museum. It must be updated where parts of it no longer serve the purpose, \nvalue the values which we hold and may require further safeguards. This is the task which is \nthe Constitutional Review Commission will examine, hopefully shortly. It will work on the \npromises of the Government, of our Government Programme such as a new generation of \nrights, of citizens, of nature, electoral reform and the consolidation of national unity. It will \nrequire time, expertise, and consultations. But, in the meantime, whatever we can do to repeal \nan absurdity such as the one we are tackling today, we will do so straightaway.  \nAs per the Criminal Code (Amendment) Bill, it is a direct consequence of the repeal of \nsection 7(2) of the Constitution because it deals with homicides, blows under lawful \nauthority. We are ensuring that it remains clearly within the scope of the revised \nconstitutional provision. In other words, no exceptions, no loopholes, no confusion. Force \ncannot be used by the State at the expense of human dignity. The new section 245 explicitly \nallows for the use of force only under very narrow defined conditions: in defence of persons, \nof property, in the course of lawful arrest, to supress a riot, to prevent the commission of a \nserious crime, and even when such conditions are met, the use of force can only be to such an \nextent as can be reasonably justified in these circumstances. \nThe message is clear.  We cannot and we will not tolerate any form of torture, whether \nfrom the police or anyone else. This Government will not allow any abuse carried out by \ncertain rogue groups, which we have seen under the previous regime did such things. The \ncitizens of this country must not and will not accept barbarism.  \n\n113 \n \nNow, Madam Speaker, the other amendment of the Criminal Code (Amendment) Bill, \nthat is, the repeal of section 242. This provision dates back, again, to our colonial era. It was \ndirectly inspired by Article 324 of the old Code pénal. It provides that persons who kill their \nspouse and the spouse’s lover upon discovering them in the act of adultery is guilty only of \nan ‘excusable’ homicide. In fact, it offers a partial defence to the so-called crime of passion.  \nArticle 324 was repealed in France, as was rightly said, in 1975. 50 years ago, it was \nalready recognised that this provision was based on an outdated and sexist assumption, in \nparticular that a man as if could possess his wife and that a woman who was unfaithful \ndeserved to die. It is high time we recognise it in Mauritius that this cannot be so. The law is \nuneven in its application and it extends the excuse to the male spouse but not to women, only \nto the male spouse, in similar situations. More fundamentally, it legitimises violence against \nwomen under the cover of emotional reaction. \nIt is true, Madam Speaker, that section 242 has never been invoked in any known case \nhere, but its presence in our law, as rightly pointed out by the Attorney General, is in itself an \naffront to the principle of equality. The fact that it remains dormant does not make it \nharmless. If it is not repealed, it could one day be used - I think the Attorney General gave an \nexample of Bahamas, if I am not mistaken -, where an act of deadly violence can be \nrekindled, and that is a risk we cannot afford. \nThe argument is simple. There is no crime of passion; a crime is a crime. Anger, \nbetrayal, emotional distress, these may explain behaviour, but they do not excuse the act of \nactually killing. A society governed by the rule of law cannot allow emotions to justify the \ntaking of a human life. This principle must be taught to our children and understood by all of \nus, and it must first be respected by our State and embodied in our laws. Over the past \ndecades, our society has seen an accelerated decay in its moral fabric. The law of the jungle \nand unabashed greed have prevailed, leading to frustration, despair in the hearts of many.  \nThe consequences are there for all of us to see.  We have seen cases of road rage, \nneighbourhood aggression, even lynching, domestic killing, which are too frequent. The \nreflex of violence as an emotional response must be stopped. My Government is all too aware \nof the immensity of the challenge, but we are determined.  \nThe repeal of section 242 also addresses another issue. The continued existence of this \nsection contradicts, in fact, our Constitution’s commitment to non-discrimination. Section 3 \nand section 16 of our Constitution protect the rights and freedoms of all individuals without \n\n114 \n \ndistinction. Section 242, by contrast, does this opposite. It allows for the law to excuse the \nkilling of a woman by a man because she is unfaithful to him, but makes no such provision if \nthe roles were reversed and it was the woman who killed the man. I think the hon. Minister \nfor Gender Equality and Family Welfare rightly stressed on this.  \nThis is not only discriminatory but also degrading. That is why in 2017, the Office of \nthe Director of Public Prosecutions described section 242 as an unjustifiable lenient approach \nand rightly pointed out that no one, male or female, owns or possesses his or her spouse or \npartner.  To leave section 242 in or law is to maintain the idea that violence, in some cases, is \nunderstandable or acceptable when it is directed against a woman. That fiction has no place in \nthe law of a republic that claims to treat all its citizens equally.  \nSome may ask, ‘why now’? I think the Leader of Opposition has a misconceived idea. I \ndon’t know what he was talking about, in fact. But some may say, ‘why now? If the provision \nhas never been used, why not leave it alone’? The answer is what the Attorney General has \njust said. The law is not about precedents; it is about possibilities. \nA law that has never been used can still be invoked tomorrow, and if it is against the \nprinciple we aspire to uphold, of equality before the law or protection against violence, of \nnon-discrimination, then it should be removed. \nMadam Speaker, these two reforms - one constitutional and one legislative - are part of \nthe same broader commitment to modernise our legal framework to remove outdated and \nharmful provisions and to align our laws with both our international obligations and our \ndemocratic values. The past has shaped us, but it does not define our future. Let us ensure \nthat the laws of this country reflect not the outmoded Mose and prejudices of a distant era but \nthe convictions of our own time.  \nWith these words, I commend both Bills to the House. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nYes, your winding-up speech, hon. Attorney General. \n(6.31 p.m.) \nThe Attorney General (Mr G. P. C. Glover, S.C.): I like the term, Madam Speaker, \n‘winding-up’. I would have thought ‘winding down’, but when you will hear what I have to \nsay, maybe we will say that the expression ‘winding-up’ is the proper expression. \n\n115 \n \nLet me first start by addressing the hon. Minister for Gender, my colleague, and say in \nno uncertain terms that marital rape will become an offence in the next law, and let me \naddress what the hon. Deputy Prime Minister said.  Yes, we will look at the new definition of \n‘rape’ in order to ensure due protection of our citizens in this country. We shall not shy away \nfrom these fundamental changes, Madam Speaker.  \nIt is by promoting a proper structure of our criminal justice system that we will ensure \nequality before the law, an essential ingredient for the rule of law to prosper. \nNow, as an answer to the hon. Leader of the Opposition, not for the first time in this \nlegislature, Madam Speaker, have we been served with a half-baked intervention from the \nhon. Leader of the Opposition. It is not because one is in the Opposition that it becomes \nnecessary to say something just for the sake of saying so. We were even served with the very \nexpression I used in my address when I said that, on this side of the House, we shall leave no \nstone unturned and bang, right on time, the same expression was used by the hon. Leader of \nthe Opposition. \nThen, the hon. Leader of the Opposition gave us a brief of what the United Nations had \nobserved as far back as 2017-2018. What he did not tell us is that faced with the inactive and \ndownright derelict attitude of the previous regime of the previous years, we had to come up \nwith a quick but nonetheless substantial amendment to placate the Committee against Torture \nin early April when I attended the Geneva Convention, and it worked, Madam Speaker. \nNext is the inexplicable aberration from the hon. Leader of the Opposition that we \nshould go about things rather cautiously. He said, “step by step”, and guess what? Exactly the \nsame words I had used in my conclusion, and his next point was rather extraordinary because \nhe told us that when amending section 245, we should not create loopholes.  \nWhen we amend the law and we put stringent conditions on a law, he says we are \ncreating loopholes. How he comes to that conclusion is beyond me and the final straw was \nthe inability of the hon. Leader of the Opposition to actually grasp the fact that the language \nof the new section 245 before this House today, as amended, is an exact replica of section \n4(2) of our Constitution. The (a), (b), (c) and (d) stem from our Constitution and he did not \neven realise it, and he based his speech on it. \nI am tempted to lapse back in French and ask you, Madam Speaker –  \n“Qui dit mieux, Madame la présidente. ” \n\n116 \n \nSo, at this stage, Madam Speaker, I move… \nMadam Speaker: You again commend the Bills to the House? \nMr Glover: I commend the Bills to the House. Yes. \nMadam Speaker: And the motion of course. The motion needs to be seconded again. \nQuestion put and agreed to.  \nBills read a second time and committed. \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(Madam Speaker in the Chair) \nThe Constitution (Amendment) Bill (No. X of 2025) was considered and agreed to. \nOn the Assembly resuming with Madam Speaker in the Chair, Madam Speaker reported \naccordingly. \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Constitution (Amendment) Bill (No. X of 2025) was \nread a third time and passed. \nMr Glover: Madam Speaker, I move for a division of votes. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. Hon. Members, since some of you are new to the House, I will \nsay a few words, as this Bill requires a qualified majority of votes of not less than three-\nquarter of all of the hon. Members of the Assembly pursuant to section 47(2) (c) of the \nConstitution. We will then proceed with the taking of votes by division. The division bell will \nring for two minutes and a division shall be taken and recorded by the Acting Clerk by asking \neach hon. Member separately, in accordance with precedence, beginning with the Member \nwho stands last in that order.  \nThe votes shall be taken by Ayes and Noes. An hon. Member may also choose to \nabstain from voting.  \nActing Clerk, please proceed with the division. \n(Division Bells were rung) \nOn question put, the House divided. \nAYES \n\n117 \n \n1. \nHon. Ms A. Savabaddy \n2. \nHon. R. Saumtally \n3. \nHon. K. Rookny \n4. \nHon. C. Ramkalawon \n5. \nHon. A. Ramdass \n6. \nHon. F. Quirin \n7. \nDr. the hon. S. Prayag \n8. \nHon. C. Lukeeram \n9. \nHon. K. Lobine \n10. \nHon. S. Jugurnauth \n11. \nHon. R. Jhummun \n12. \nHon. Ms D. Henriette-Manan \n13. \nHon. F. François \n14. \nHon. R. Etwareea \n15. \nHon. J. Edouard \n16. \nDr. the hon. Ms R.  Daureeawo \n17. \nHon. Ms M. R. Collet \n18. \nHon. L. Caserne \n19. \nHon. N. Beejan \n20. \nHon. R. Beechook \n21. \nHon. C. Baboolall \n22. \nHon. B. Babajee \n23. \nHon. T. Apollon \n24. \nHon. P. Venkatasami \n25. \nHon. E. Juman \n26. \nHon. V. Baloomoody \n27. \nHon. Ms S. Anquetil \n28. \nHon. Ms V. Leu-Govind \n29. \nHon. K. Parapen \n30. \nHon. H. Narsinghen \n31. \nHon. Ms A. Babooram \n32. \nHon. F. Allymun \n33. \nHon. S. Pierre \n34. \nHon. Ms K. Foo Kune-Bacha \n\n118 \n \n35. \nHon. F. David \n36. \nHon. Ms J. Bérenger \n37. \nHon. D. Damry \n38. \nHon. M. Gondeea \n39. \nHon. R. Woochit \n40. \nHon. L. Pentiah \n41. \nDr. the hon. A. Ramtohul \n42. \nDr. the hon. M. Gungapersad \n43. \nHon. A. Ameer Meea \n44. \nDr. the hon. K. Sukon \n45. \nHon. M. Yeung Sik Yuen \n46. \nHon. Ms A. Navarre-Marie \n47. \nHon. Osman Mahomed \n48. \nHon. R. Uteem \n49. \nHon. D. Nagalingum \n50. \nHon. P. Assirvaden \n51. \nHon. A. Subron \n52. \nHon. R. Duval \n53. \nHon. A. Bachoo \n54. \nHon. G. Gunness \n55. \nDr. the hon. A. Boolell \n56. \nHon. S. Mohamed  \n57. \nHon. P. Bérenger \n58. \nHon. Prime Minister \nABSENT \n1. \nDr. the hon. Ms B. Thannoo \n2. \nHon. M. Seeburn \n3. \nDr. the hon. F. Aumeer \n4. \nHon. A. Duval \n5. \nHon. G. Lesjongard \n6. \nHon. D. Ramful \n7. \nDr. the hon. Ms J. Jeetun \n8. \nHon. R. Bhagwan \n\n119 \n \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, the results of the Division are as follows – \nAyes: 58    \n \nNoes: 0    \n \nAbstention: 0    \n \nAbsent: 8 \nHon. Members, I wish to inform the House that the Constitution (Amendment) Bill \n(No. X of 2025) has, on final voting, obtained 58 votes, that is, has been supported by a three-\nquarter majority as required by Section 47 (2) (c) of the Constitution. I declare that the Bill \nhas been read a third time and passed. \n(Applause) \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(Madam Speaker in the Chair) \nTHE CRIMINAL CODE (AMENDMENT) BILL  \n(NO. XI of 2025) \nThe Criminal Code (Amendment) Bill (No. XI of 2025) was considered and agreed to. \nOn the Assembly resuming with Madam Speaker in the Chair, Madam Speaker reported \naccordingly. \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Criminal Code (Amendment) Bill (No. XI of 2025) \nwas read a third time and passed. \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Thursday 05 June 2025 at 5.00 p.m. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned! \nAt 6.51 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Thursday 05 June 2025 at \n5.00 p.m. \n \n \n \n\n120 \n \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nRODRIGUES-MAURITIUS – AIRFARES SUBSIDY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/521",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 521,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/521) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the irregular water supply at \nCoteau Raffin, Le Morne, Bambous and surrounding regions, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to the short and long terms \nremedial measures taken and/or being envisaged to address same and, if so, when.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Central Water Authority (CWA) that the regions of \nCoteau Raffin, Le Morne, Bambous, and the surrounding localities are water stressed areas. \nIn this regard, the CWA has taken a number of measures to address the situation. \nThe region of Bambous faces persistent water supply challenges due to increasing \ndemand and limited water resources. I am informed that the CWA in collaboration with the \nWastewater Management Authority (WMA) has replaced approximately 2.8 kilometres of \nold and defective water pipes in Residences La Ferme thereby benefitting some 340 \nhouseholds. This project was completed on 09 April 2025 and water supply has greatly \nimproved. \nSecondly, in the context of expanding mobilisation of groundwater resources, the CWA \nis in the process of commissioning two boreholes – one at Gamma Yard, La Chaumière, with \nan additional supply of 2,000 cubic metres per day and another in the industrial zone of \nBambous with a capacity of 1,000 cubic metres per day. They are expected to be \noperationalised shortly and will significantly enhance water supply to the industrial zone as \nwell as residential zone. \nThirdly, the CWA proposes to abstract water from Rivière Rempart and has identified a \nlocation for the installation of a new Containerised Pressure Filter (CPF) unit with a capacity \nof 2,000 cubic metres per day. \n\n134 \n \nIn order to improve service at Coteau Raffin, the CWA is currently exploring the \npossibility of increasing water production through the installation of a new Containerised \nPressure Filter (CPF) unit at River Bois Noir, with a proposed capacity of 2,000 cubic metres \nper day. This CPF will be directed to the Bois Puant Reservoir, which feeds Coteau Raffin. \nThe region of Le Morne, is supplied from a Containerised Pressure Filter (CPF) located \non Baie du Cap River.  However, water supply is disrupted during and after heavy rainfall \ndue to muddy water blocking the filters.  During such times when the CPF is switched off, I \nam informed that the CWA diverts water from the L’Embrasure Reservoir to supply Le \nMorne Village.  Water tankers are also deployed to ensure continuous supply to the residents. \nRODRIGUES – PUBLIC SECTOR EFFICIENCY & QUALITY SERVICE – \nASSISTANCE & PLANS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/522",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 522,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms",
      "question": "(No. B/522) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nPublic Service and Administrative Reforms whether, in regard to public sector efficiency and \nquality service in Rodrigues, he will state if consideration will be given to assist, through \nstructured collaborative plans, the Rodrigues Regional Assembly administration in relation \nthereto and, if so, give details thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: As announced in the Government Programme 2025-2029, this Government has \ntaken the firm commitment to make the Public Service become more efficient and effective \nwhilst adopting a citizen-centric approach and providing the necessary support and training to \nits staff. \nMy Ministry is responsible to assist in Government's transformation agenda and will, to \nthat effect, come up with the following initiatives – \n(a) \nMy Ministry is proposing to develop a Strategic Framework for Public Service \nand Administrative Reforms 2025-2029, which will aim at providing a cohesive \nand forward-looking framework to guide reform and transformation efforts \nacross the Public Service. This Strategy will be conceived as a key enabler for \naligning public sector reforms with the broader national development agenda, \nwith a strong focus on innovation, digitalisation, accountability, and people-\ncentric service delivery. Once finalised, the new Strategy will serve as a \ncomprehensive \nroadmap \nfor \nenhancing \norganisational \nperformance, \nstreamlining bureaucratic processes, and embedding a culture of continuous \nimprovement and adaptability across Ministries and Departments; \n\n135 \n \n(b) \nMy Ministry will come up with a Public Sector Reforms Bill, to provide, inter \nalia, for reforms initiatives supported by appropriate legal framework with \nfocus on good governance, transparency and accountability, thus paving the way \nfor an Open Government Culture; \n(c) \nThe introduction of a Public Service Reforms Scheme, which will provide, \namongst others, for the establishment of Reforms and Innovation Units (RIUs) \nin all Ministries and Departments. These units will replace the existing \nTransformation Implementation Committees and will serve as dedicated \ntransformation and innovation hubs to coordinate, manage, and drive reform \ninitiatives. Each RIU will be composed of officers trained in change \nmanagement, process innovation, and digital transformation, and will include \nthe appointment of a Director of Reforms to lead change efforts within the \ninstitution. Monitoring and evaluating reform initiatives will also be carried out \nthrough Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and evidence-based reporting, and \n(d) \nMy Ministry is planning to review and digitalise the current Performance \nManagement System (PMS), with a view to developing a more results-oriented, \ntransparent, and measurable framework for performance evaluation and \ndevelopment planning. \nIn its capacity-building efforts, the newly inaugurated Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of \nPublic Service and Innovation will come up with tailor-made trainings on leadership and \nchange management at all levels in the public service, as well as, introduce credit-based \nmodules. One such area of focus will be the growing importance of Emerging and Disruptive \nTechnologies, particularly Artificial Intelligence (AI), in transforming the delivery of public \nservices. \nMy Ministry will provide the necessary support for capacity building and development \nto the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Administration. This forward-thinking approach will \nsupport Rodrigues in staying abreast of technological advancements and building internal \ncapabilities to lead digital transformation initiatives. \nThe Sandbox Framework, which is spearheaded by the Public Sector Business \nTransformation Bureau of my Ministry, has provided a structured and low-risk environment \nfor Public Bodies to experiment with and test innovative ideas and digital solutions before \nscaling them up. \n\n136 \n \nThe replication of the Sandbox Framework in Rodrigues would empower the regional \nadministration to co-create solutions, accelerate the adoption of digital tools, and promote a \nculture of experimentation and innovation, thereby strengthening its service delivery \nmechanisms and institutional resilience. \nThe following reform initiatives have already been implemented by my Ministry, \namongst others – \n(a) \nThe electronic Human Resource Management Information System (e-HR) on a \nfull-scale basis; \n(b) \nThe Digital Collaborative Platform and Document Management System for \nScheme of Service (e-SOS Project), under the Sandbox Framework, on a pilot \nbasis, and \n(c) \nThe electronic Document Management System (EDMS), on a pilot basis. \nMy Ministry is currently in the process of rolling out the e-SOS across the Public \nService and scaling up of the EDMS within other units of my Ministry. Consideration will be \ngiven to extend these reform initiatives in Rodrigues.  \nConsideration will also be given for a dedicated section to be included in the Strategic \nFramework for Public Service and Administrative Reforms 2025-2029 to address the specific \nreform and capacity-building needs of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Administration. \nMy Ministry stands ready to provide the necessary technical assistance to the Rodrigues \nRegional Assembly Administration for the successful implementation of public service \nreform initiatives, thereby ensuring that the benefits of a modernised and effective public \nservice are equitably shared across the nation. \nCAMP THOREL – CUT-OFF DRAIN PROJECT – PHASE 2B",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/523",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 523,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/523) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the cut-off drain project \nphase 2B being implemented by the Drain Infrastructure Constructions Ltd., at Camp Thorel, \nhe will state where matters stand, indicating – \n(a) \nthe scope of works and cost thereof; \n(b) \nif access to private land were sought from and granted by the respective land \nowners prior to the implementation thereof and, if not, the reasons therefor, and  \n(c) \nthe expected completion date thereof. \n\n137",
      "answer": "Reply: The region of Camp Thorel has been subject to recurrent flooding due to surface \nrun off being generated from higher grounds. Due to the land topography which naturally \nslopes towards the village, flooding and water accumulation is a high risk.   \nThe Land Drainage Authority in August 2019 declared the region of Camp Thorel as a \nhigh-risk flood prone area and a drain project was earmarked for implementation under the \nNational Flood Management Programme.  \nA phased approach was considered for the implementation of the project –  \n(i) \nPhase 1 of the project which involved the construction of around 280 metres of \nright hand side of cut-off drain near Kalimaye up to the outlet into river Pondar \nwas undertaken by the District Council of Moka from NDU funding. Same was \ncompleted in November 2021; \n(ii) \nPhase 2A comprising of the construction of internal drains within the village was \nimplemented by the NDU and completed in March 2023; \n(iii) Phase 2B which includes the construction of right hand side of cut-off drain from \nhighest point to connect to the drain constructed by the District Council of Moka \nis being undertaken by the Drains Infrastructure Construction Ltd, and  \n(iv) Phase 2C which involves the construction of left hand side of cut-off drain from \nhighest point to River Pondar is being implemented by the NDU. \nRegarding part (a) of the question, the scope of works and costs of phase 2B are being \nplaced in the Library of the National Assembly. \n Regarding part (b) of the question, out of 31 plots of land concerned for Phase 2B, the \nright of access on 28 plots had been secured at the start of the construction works.  The \nowners of the remaining three plots of land were not agreeable to the project. Compulsory \nland acquisition has been initiated in February and June 2024 and procedures are ongoing. \nConstruction works have reached 80% completion as at date. \n With regard to part (c) of the question, it is expected that the works for Phase 2B will \nbe completed by December 2025. \nE-HEALTH PROJECT – IMPLEMENTATION STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/524",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 524,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/524) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the e-Health Project, he will state the \ncurrent status thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n\n138 \n \nGENTILLY BRIDGE – RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/525",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 525,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/525) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the project for the \nreconstruction of the Gentilly bridge, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nDistrict Council of Moka, information as to where matters stand, indicating – \n(a) \nthe initial start and expected completion dates thereof;  \n(b) \nthe scope of works and cost thereof, and  \n(c) \nif there are any cost overrun and delay for the completion thereof and, if so, give \ndetails thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nALMA, DAGOTIÈRE, L’AVENIR REGIONS – WATER SUPPLY – BOREHOLES \nDRILLING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/526",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 526,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/526) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to water supply in Alma, \nDagotiere, L’Avenir and surrounding regions, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Central Water Authority, information as to whether consideration will be given for \nthe drilling of new boreholes to service these regions and, if so, when and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nNLTA – HEAD OFFICE – PROPOSED RELOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/527",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 527,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/527) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the proposed relocation \nof the Head Office of the National Land Transport Authority, he will state where matters \nstand.",
      "answer": "Reply: I wish to inform the House that the number of daily transactions undertaken at \nthe level of the counters of the National Land Transport Authority (NLTA) has increased \nexponentially with the average yearly rise of around 4 to 5% in our vehicle fleet which \ncurrently stands at some 720,000. \nWith a view to enhancing the NLTA counter services, a proposal was made in June \n2024 by the former Government to relocate some of the NLTA counters at the Victoria Urban \nTerminal which is easily accessible to the public. \n\n139 \n \nSubsequently, in December 2024, that is, about one month after I took office at the \nMinistry, a joint site visit was held at the Victoria Urban Terminal together with my \ncolleague, the Minister of Local Government, whereby a proposal was made to relocate not \nonly some of the NLTA counters but also the NLTA Head Office which is housed at the MSI \nBuilding, Cassis, since more than two decades. This relocation was mooted due to the \nstrategic location of the Urban Terminal whilst catering for a more spacious office and \nimproved work environment for the NLTA Staff. \nTechnical working sessions were subsequently held by the NLTA and the Architect \nsection of the Ministry of National Infrastructure to come up with proposals and cost \nestimates. \nHowever, I have to inform the House that no furtherance is being given to this \nrelocation due to the excessively high costs implications estimated at some Rs106 million \nrelating only to the partitioning works communicated to my Ministry by the Ministry of \nNational Infrastructure. Additionally, I am made to understand that this exercise would entail \nrelocation costs together with a monthly rental of around Rs1.75 million in respect of one \nfloor at the Victoria Urban Terminal. In view of the present State of the Economy, it is not \ndeemed appropriate to pursue with such exorbitant initiative, at this stage. \nNevertheless, in line with this Government’s endeavour to decentralise the NLTA \nservices, several other measures are underway. Firstly, my Ministry is working in close \ncollaboration with the Registrar General’s Department for the proposed setting up of a \nVehicle Registration and Transfer Centre at Phoenix to provide a one-stop-shop service to the \ncustomers, especially those from the South and Plaines Wilhems. \nAdditionally, the opening of a sub office of the NLTA in the North of the island is also \nin the pipeline and I am informed by the NLTA that an Expression of Interest was launched \non 20 March 2025 for the renting of office to house a sub-office in the Northern Region \nwithin the District of Pamplemousses or Rivière du Rempart. Three offers, namely in the \nregions of Terre Rouge, Triolet and Rivière du Rempart were received as at the closing date \nof 11 April 2025. Site visits are being undertaken by the NLTA. \nGOVERNMENT BUILDINGS – RAIN WATER HARVESTING SYSTEMS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/528",
      "sitting_id": "13-may-2025",
      "date": "2025-05-13",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 528,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/528) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to Government \n\n140 \n \nbuildings, he will state if consideration will be given for the provision of rain water \nharvesting systems thereat.",
      "answer": "Reply: The issue of integrating rainwater harvesting systems in government buildings \nis both timely and relevant, particularly in view of the growing need for sustainable water \nresource management and climate-resilient infrastructure in Mauritius. I wish to reassure the \nHouse that Government is giving serious consideration to this matter, in line with its \noverarching policy under the Government Programme 2025-2029 and our Sustainable \nDevelopment Goals. \nMy Ministry has been actively promoting the installation of rainwater harvesting \nsystems in government building projects. This initiative aims to conserve water resources and \nminimise the discharge of rainwater into stormwater drains. Some projects where such \nsystems have already been implemented include the Community Health Centre at Pointe aux \nSables and various buildings in Agaléga. Additionally, the installation of rainwater harvesting \nsystem is being considered for upcoming government projects, such as the Visitors’ Centres \nat Plaine Paul in Chamouny and Bel Ombre, the Office Block of the Water Resources \nCommission in Rose Hill, and the new Headquarters of the Forestry Department in Curepipe, \namongst others. \nWith regard to existing government buildings, a survey would need to be conducted to \nassess the feasibility of retrofitting them with rainwater harvesting systems, and to find out \nwhether such installations are technically, structurally, and economically viable. \nMoreover, I wish to inform the House that in line with its functions under the \nConstruction Industry Authority Act 2023, the Construction Industry Authority (CIA) is \nmandated to develop and maintain a comprehensive Building Code for Mauritius. This \nNational Building Code is intended to establish minimum standards for functionality, safety, \nstructural integrity, environmental performance, and sustainability in the design and \nconstruction of buildings. \nIn this endeavour, I have been informed that the CIA would take into account the \nimportance of such systems in the formulation of the National Building Code.  \nThe inclusion of rainwater harvesting systems in government buildings is not simply a \nmatter of environmental preference - it is becoming an inherent aspect for smart, sustainable, \nand future-ready public infrastructure. Incorporating these systems at the planning and design \n\n141 \n \nstages will not only enhance water resilience but also demonstrate responsible leadership in \npublic sector construction. \nI wish to assure the House that my Ministry remains resolute in its efforts to build \ninfrastructure that meets the needs of today, without compromising the sustainability of \ntomorrow while also supporting national resilience objectives and contributing to the \nachievement of our Sustainable Development Goals.",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/529",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 529,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/529) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the IT \nequipment and operating system being used at the Moka Police Station, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the date of \nthe last upgrade thereof, indicating the scheduled timeframe of the next upgrade thereof, if \nany.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I will reply to \nParliamentary Questions B/529, B/530, and B/538 together as they relate to the same subject \nmatter. \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Police that all Police Stations, including that of \nMoka, Saint Pierre, and Quartier Militaire are equipped with essential IT equipment such as \nPersonal Computers for the use of the Crime Occurrence Tracking System (COTS) and \nTerminals for the access to the Criminal Attribute Database (CADB), footages of Safe City \nand CCTV systems. \nWith regard to Personal Computers, they are replaced and upgraded as and when \nrequired. An average of 200 new PC units are procured each year to support and replace \nhardware across the Police Service. \nThe Crime Occurrence Tracking System (COTS), which is a digital platform \nconnecting all Police Stations to the main server at the Police Headquarters, is used for the \nmanagement and tracking of complaints and declarations, from initial reporting to final case \ndisposal. It has been operational since 2011. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that while the system has been enhanced, it has never \nbeen upgraded. The Police have initiated action to replace the COTS entirely with a modern, \nhigh-performance case management system, and it is expected that this system will be \n\n13 \n \ncompatible with the latest technologies, offer faster processing, user-friendliness, and higher \nstorage capacity. \nThe Central Informatics Bureau is working closely with the Police on this project and \nhas advised that the services of a special consultant be retained.  This process is underway. \nAs regards the access to the Criminal Attribute Database (CADB) in the Police \nStations, I am informed that it has not been upgraded since its implementation in 1999.  An \namount of Rs43 million has been provided in the Budget for this financial year for a fully \nintegrated, modernised system, which will include a new version of the CADB that can \nhandle criminal records and identity verification using biometric data. The tenders will be \nlaunched by the end of August of this year and is expected to be operational within the next \ntwo years. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to the IT infrastructure for CCTV and the Safe City \nSystems, both are on a lease agreement with Brinks Ltd and Mauritius Telecoms, \nrespectively, which caters for maintenance and software and hardware upgrade as well. The \ntechnological upgrade for the CCTV cameras is presently being undertaken by Brinks Ltd. As \nfor the Safe City camera systems, according to the lease agreement, a technology refresh is \ndue in December 2025. \nMadam Speaker, this is the legacy left by the previous Government: outdated systems, \nunder-equipped stations, and a Police Force left behind in the digital age. We are now \nmoving from a decade of neglect to an era of progress and reform. \nAs clearly stated in the Government Programme 2025-2029, digital transformation of \nMauritius will be one of the major reforms to be undertaken. \nIn this respect, as announced in the Budget Speech, we are coming shortly with a \nCybersecurity and Cybercrime Act which will be aligned with international standards.  A \nCybersecurity Operation Centre will be set up based on the UK model. \nMadam Speaker, Government will continue to invest in a Police Force that is digitally \nenabled, secure, and ready for the future. This is the kind of bold, forward-looking reform \nthat the Police Force has long needed and my Government has pledged to deliver. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \n\n14 \n \nST PIERRE POLICE STATION – IT INFRASTRUCTURE & OPERATING SYSTEM \n– REFORMS & UDGRADES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/530",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 530,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/530) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the IT \nequipment and operating system being used at the St Pierre Police Station, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the date of \nthe last upgrade thereof, indicating the scheduled timeframe of the next upgrade thereof, if \nany.",
      "answer": "(Vide reply to PQ B/529) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, we have been advised that PQ B/531 has been \nwithdrawn. So, I will now call on the hon. Member for Grand'Baie and Poudre d'Or, Mr \nBeejan! \nMOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS & ASSESSMENTS – MAURITIUS – 2014-2025",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-18-march-2025",
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/531",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 531,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/531) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Moody’s credit ratings and assessments for Mauritius, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to the reasons for the changes thereof over the period 2014 to \n2025.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGRAND GAUBE POLICE STATION – POLICE OFFICERS, VEHICLE FLEET & \nCONTRAVENTIONS BOOKED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/532",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 532,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/532) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nGrand Gaube Police Station, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the number of Police Officers posted thereat, \nindicating – \n\n15 \n \n(a) \ntheir respective ranks, and  \n(b) \nthe number of – \n(i) \nvehicles at the disposal thereof, and  \n(ii) \ncontraventions booked since January 2024 to date.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat the Grand Gaube Police Station covers an area of 11 square kilometres with some 20,000 \ninhabitants. The surrounding areas of Sans Souci, Anse La Raie, Petit Paquet, St. Francois, \nCalodyne, Petit Camp, Melville, and Camp La Serpe, amongst others, fall under the \njurisdiction of Grand Gaube Police Station. \nIn regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that 51 Police Officers in the \nfollowing ranks are posted at Grand Gaube Police Station – \n• 1 Chief Inspector; \n• 2 Inspectors; \n• 1 Sub-Inspector; \n• 15 Police Sergeants; \n• 2 Women Police Sergeants; \n• 20 Police Constables, and \n• 10 Women Police Constables. \nFurthermore, the Grand Gaube Police Station is supported in the exercise of its \nfunctions by other Units/Branches of the Police, such as, the Goodlands Central Investigation \nDivision, the Northern Division Supporting Unit, the Field Intelligence Unit, the Anti-Drug \nand Smuggling Unit based at Poudre d’Or, the Emergency Response Service, the National \nCoast Guard at Grand Gaube, the Police de L’Environnement of Trou aux Biches, and the \nTraffic Police. \nIn regard to part (b)(i) of the question, I am informed that two police vans are allotted \nto Grand Gaube Police Station. \nAs regards part (b)(ii) of the question, 454 contraventions had been established in the \nyear 2024, and 332 during the period from January 2025 to 11 June 2025.  All the \ncontraventions were related to road traffic offences, except one established in 2024 was for \nthe offence of noise pollution causing nuisance. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \n\n16 \n \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Allow me to mention that many repeated \nconcerns… \nMadam Speaker: No, no! Question; not statements! \nMr Beejan: Yes. So, can the hon. Prime Minister inform the House whether additional \nmeasures will be planned to address issues of law and order in the region of Grand Gaube? \nThank you. \nThe Prime Minister: In fact, the Commissioner of Police is looking at all police \nstations across the island to see what can be done. \n I should have added that he also carried out a special crackdown operation because of \nthe noise pollution caused by motorcycles with inefficient silencers and drivers operating \nmotor vehicles under the influence of alcohol or illicit drugs, and music from bungalows, \nguest houses and on the public beaches. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, the hon. First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \nCÔTE D’OR, 27 AUGUST 2024 – INCIDENT INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/533",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 533,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/533) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the incident which occurred during a protest at Côte d’Or on 27 August 2024, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to \nwhether an inquiry has been carried out thereinto, indicating if – \n(a)  the police officers present thereat had recourse to the use of force against the \ndemonstrators, and  \n(b)  private bouncers intervened therein.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat, on 27 August 2024 at 16 00 hrs, the then Ministry of Arts and Cultural Heritage had \norganised a ceremony at Côte d’Or for the handing over of lease agreements of plots of State \nland to the Hindi Speaking Union, the Urdu Speaking Union, and the Mauritius Tamil \nCultural Centre Trust.  \n\n17 \n \nIt should be recalled that the ceremony was taking place at a time of high tension in the \nwake of the unilateral decision of the then government to retrieve the land that was originally \nleased to the Mauritius Tamil Cultural Centre Trust located at Réduit Triangle. This was done \nwith the deliberate purpose of transferring the said land in favour of a company belonging to \nthe Nundun Gopee Group to enable it to expand its business at Réduit Triangle for the setting \nup of a luxury retirement village.  This was interpreted as a supreme insult by the Tamil \ncommunity. \nOn 27 August at around 15 50 hours, seven persons, in total conformity with the \nlegislation pertaining to public gathering, were demonstrating at some distance from that \nlocation where the ceremony was taking place. \nPolice arrested four of the seven demonstrators for the offence of ‘Rogue and \nVagabond’. Three of the demonstrators, namely Mr M.G., Mr D.K. and Mr D.G. were \nbrutally pulled from where they were standing and were brought to the Moka Central CID \nOffice. \nOne Mr H.N. was dragged by force and brutalised by Police in civil clothes.  He was \nhurt when he was thrust to the ground. He was, thereafter, pushed violently into a police \nvehicle, with the Police taking no consideration at all of his protest to the effect that he had \nalready been hurt. Mr H.N. got a malaise and had to be conveyed to Wellkin Fortis Clinic as a \nresult of this.  \nMadam Speaker, the enquiry into the case of ‘Rogue and Vagabond’ is ongoing. \nOn 29 August 2024, Mr R.S. was provisionally charged with the offence of ‘Assault \nagainst agent of civil authority’ before Moka District Court. He was allowed bail after \nfurnishing a surety of Rs8,000 and a recognizance of Rs30,000. \nMadam Speaker, in regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that the Police \nOfficers had recourse to the use of force against the demonstrators as according to them, the \ndemonstrators were resisting their arrest. This was not the case; you can see it in the video. \nEven though the matter was videotaped and went viral on social media, the brutal acts \ncommitted by the Police were not enquired into by the Independent Police Complaints \nCommission. \n\n18 \n \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that \nas per records, no private bouncers were present during the protest at Côte d’Or on 27 August \n2024. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, happy? Alright!  \nThe hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES – FCC SUB-OFFICE – CORRUPTION CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/534",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 534,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/534) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the fight against \ncorruption in Rodrigues over the past three years, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Financial Crimes Commission, information as to the number of cases currently \nunder investigation thereat, indicating the number of public officials, service providers and \ncontractors who have been or are facing investigation, particularly, in relation to the award of \nGovernment projects and/or resources.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed that in September 2007, the then \nIndependent Commission Against Corruption opened a sub-office in Rodrigues for a more \nefficient implementation of its mandate in relation to education, prevention, and \ninvestigation. \nI am also informed, Madam Speaker, that at present, 27 cases are being investigated by \nthe Financial Crimes Commission sub-office in Rodrigues and the number of officials who \nhave been facing or who are facing investigations in Rodrigues is 29.  \nAs regards service providers and contractors who have been or who are facing \ninvestigations, nine service providers are currently undergoing investigations in connection \nwith the award of contract of government projects. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. François! \nMr François: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I thank the hon. Prime Minister for his \nanswer. May I ask the hon. Prime Minister whether, from the 29 officials, there is any high-\nprofile person involved, not to say serving politician for conflict of interest, bribery, influence \non decision of procurement, allocation of State lands, fraud by abusing his/her position, for a \ndirect or indirect interest for himself/herself or any close relatives? \n\n19 \n \nThe Prime Minister: I am not able to say that, Madam Speaker, because the \ninvestigation is ongoing. \nMadam Speaker: Of course!  \nMr François: A second one, Madam Speaker. Following a letter from the Rodrigues \nPublic Service Union, Platform Syndikal Rodrig addressed to the hon. Prime Minister, I am \nin copy, may I also ask the hon. Prime Minister whether he is agreeable to use his good office \nto request the Commission, in line with the principle of good governance, to liaise with \nunions and the Regional Assembly for the setting up of anti-financial crime practices in \nRodrigues to eliminate financial crimes? \nThe Prime Minister: I cannot really give instructions to the FCC, but I can pass on the \nmessage. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nHon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \nPUBLIC SERVICE – SALARIES & BENEFITS – FOREIGN CURRENCY \nPOLICY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/535",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 535,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/535) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the practice of paying salaries and benefits to incumbents of positions in the public \nservice in foreign currency, he will state if consideration will be given for same to be \ndiscontinued and, if so, when and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed that no officer in the public \nservice based in Mauritius is being paid salary/benefits in foreign currency, except for foreign \nnationals whose services have been enlisted in view of their technical expertise and in line \nwith the terms of their contracts. \nHowever, Ambassadors and officers of the diplomatic cadre, who are posted in \nMauritius Missions abroad are paid salary in foreign currency in accordance with the \nrecommendations of the PRB. They are also paid their foreign service and other allowances \nin foreign currency.   \n\n20 \n \nMadam Speaker, I wish to refer the hon. Member to my reply to Parliamentary \nQuestion B/410 for the Sitting of 06 May of this year in relation to the salary and fringe \nbenefits drawn by Mr Beekarry, former Director-General of the Financial Crimes \nCommission. I wish to reiterate that when Mr Beekarry assumed duty as Director-General of \nthe now defunct ICAC, he was drawing a salary of Rs375,000 monthly, however 50% \npayable in Mauritian Rupees and 50% in US Dollars. When his appointment was renewed for \na further period of five years in 2021, his monthly salary was revised to Rs420,000, payable \nagain 50% in Mauritian Rupees and 50% in US Dollars.   \nHowever, following the establishment of the Financial Crimes Commission in March \n2023, Mr Beekarry was drawing a monthly salary of Rs525,000 as Director-General of the \nCommission, that is, an increase of Rs105,000. \nMadam Speaker: You are alright with that? Yes! \nThe hon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle, Mr Seeburn! \nMAUBANK LTD – GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT& RETURNS (2015-2024)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/536",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 536,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/536) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to MauBank \nLtd., he will state the amount of public funds invested therein by Government over the period \n2015 to November 2024, indicating the Return on the said Investments by Government in \nrelation thereto, if any.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that Government \nhas injected funds in the form of equity into MauBank Ltd through the MauBank Holdings \nLtd, where Government is the sole shareholder.  MauBank Ltd is a subsidiary owned by \nMaubank Holdings Ltd.  \nI am informed, Madam Speaker, that over the period September 2015 to November \n2024, Government has injected funds amounting to Rs3.69 billion as follows – \n(a) \nRs1.5 billion on 17 September 2015 for the acquisition of shares in Ex-Mauritius \nPost and Cooperative Bank Ltd and Ex National Commercial Bank Ltd; \n(b) \nRs300 million on 29 October 2015 to enable Maubank Ltd to meet its regulatory \ncapital requirements; \n\n21 \n \n(c) \nRs1.3 billion on 13 January 2016 to enable Maubank Ltd to meet its regulatory \ncapital requirements, \n(d) \nRs500 million on 01 April 2024 for the growth and expansion of the bank. \nGovernment, I must say, Madam Speaker has not yet received any return on investment \nfrom MauBank Holdings Ltd since its incorporation in September 2015. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nRRA – 2025-2026 BUDGET ESTIMATES – ESTABLISHED PROJECTS & \nPROGRAMMES – BUDGET QUANTUM",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/537",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 537,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/537) Mr J. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the 2025-2026 \nBudget Estimates, he will state if the – \n(a) \nprojects and programmes established and approved by the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly (RRA) for Rodrigues Island for formal appropriation through the \nNational Assembly are included in the Public Sector Investment Programme \n2025-2026 to 2029-2030, Capital Development Programme of Central \nGovernment and, if not, why not, indicating the implications thereof, and  \n(b) \nbudgetary quantum initially agreed upon between the Ministry and the RRA was \nmodified by the latter and, if so, indicate the implications thereof and measures \nbeing envisaged in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, concerning part (a) of the question, I have been \ninformed that the projects and programmes relating to Rodrigues Island have been included \nin the total amount of the Public Sector Investment Programme 2025-2026 to 2029-2030. \nIn this regard, for Financial Year 2025-2026, a total provision of Rs785 million has \nbeen made in the Performance-Based Budget Estimates 2025-2026 under the “Programme \n0205: Rodrigues and Outer Islands” as capital grant to Rodrigues Regional Assembly for \nappropriation by the National Assembly.   \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that in its budget for Financial Year 2025-\n2026, the Rodrigues Regional Assembly (RRA) made a provision of Rs990 million for the \nimplementation of capital projects. However, taking into account the implementation capacity \nas well as the state of preparedness of the projects, government has provided Rs785 million. \n\n22 \n \nIn fact, for the current financial year, that is, 2024-2025, a total sum of Rs1.285 billion \nwas voted by the National Assembly as capital grant to the Rodrigues Regional Assembly. \nHowever, as at date, the latter has only spent Rs479 million, that is, 37% of the allocated \nbudget. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, following discussions at technical level, a total sum \nof Rs5.605 billion was initially agreed between the Ministry of Finance and the RRA for \nFinancial Year 2025-2026 as follows – \n(i) \nRs4.82 billion for recurrent expenditure, and \n(ii) \nRs785 million for capital expenditure. \nHowever, on 10 April 2025, the RRA presented a budget of Rs6.086 billion in the \nRegional Assembly, of which Rs 5.096 billion was for recurrent expenditure and Rs990 \nmillion for capital expenditure.  \nOn 18 April of this year, government considered the proposals and has agreed to \nincrease the provision for recurrent expenditure by Rs180 million to Rs5 billion while the \nsum for capital expenditure has been maintained at Rs785 million. \nThe Rodrigues Regional Assembly has already been informed of the budget allocation \nagreed by government for Financial Year 2025-2026 and the Rodrigues Regional Assembly \nwill amend its budget accordingly. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that, in addition to the Rs785 million \nprovided as capital grant for Financial Year 2025-2026, an amount of around Rs1.6 billion \nhas also been included in the Budget for various other projects. These include Rs1 billion for \nthe construction of the new runway at Plaine Corail and Rs340 million for water-related \nprojects as well as Rs60 million for drain projects in Rodrigues. \nMadam Speaker: I am sure you can come back on all this during the debate.  \nI will proceed with the next question therefore. We don’t have much time left! \nI think we have done B/538 already. So, the hon. Second Member for Rivière des \nAnguilles and Souillac! \n \nQUARTIER MILITAIRE POLICE STATION – IT EQUIPMENT & OPERATING \nSYSTEM – UPGRADING \n\n23",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025",
        "monday-23-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/538",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 538,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/538) Mr P. Venkatasami  (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the IT \nequipment and operating system being used at the Quartier Militaire Police Station, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the \ndate of the last upgrade thereof, indicating the scheduled timeframe of the next upgrade \nthereof, if any.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/529) \nN. G & CO. LTD & SUBSIDIARIES – CONTRACTS AWARDED (2015-2024)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/539",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 539,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/539) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to N. G & Co. Ltd., and its subsidiaries, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to the number of contracts awarded thereto by Ministries and/or Parastatal \nbodies over the period 2015 to 2024, indicating in each case the – \n (a) contract value thereof, and  \n(b)  procurement method used therefor.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Member for asking this \nquestion.  \nIn fact, N.G & Co. Ltd. is owned by Nundun Gopee and Vinash Gopee, who were very, \nvery close to the previous Prime Minister.  \nOn the basis of information gathered, N.G & Co. Ltd was awarded the following \ncontracts – \n(i) \nA contract awarded by the NHDC Ltd on 29 April 2015 for the construction of 73 \nLow-Cost Housing Units and Associated Infrastructural Works, and 13 Serviced \nPlots at Petit Bel Air. The initial amount of the contract was estimated at Rs88 \nmillion.  However, a final payment of Rs110 million was made to N.G & Co. Ltd \nto cater for variation works estimated at Rs22 million. \nI wish to inform the House that N.G & Co. Ltd. had subcontracted the entire work \nto Pybig Construction Ltd for an amount of Rs76 million. Hence, N.G & Co. Ltd.  \n\n24 \n \npocketed the difference, that is, an amount of Rs34 million for a project it acted \nonly as a middleman. \n \nThis is clearly in violation of the condition of the contract. \n(ii) \nAnother contract awarded by the NHDC Ltd on 29 September 2016 for the \nconstruction of 50 Housing Units and Associated Infrastructural Works at \nSouillac for a sum of Rs82 million;  \n(iii) On 29 December 2017, the Ministry of Health and Wellness, after an \ninternational bidding exercise, awarded the contract for the construction of the \nNew ENT Hospital at Vacoas to a joint venture led by Ramacivil India \nConstruction PVT Ltd and N.G & Co. Ltd. for a sum of Rs926.2 million; \n(iv) N.G & Co. Ltd. was awarded, on 22 May 2023, through direct procurement, a \ncontract for the design and construction of 800 housing units for a total amount of \nRs2.2 billion by the National Social Living Development Ltd. However, on 03 \nJuly 2023, NSLD terminated the contract due to failure by the latter to comply \nwith the terms of the Letter of Acceptance and the Conditions of Contract. I am \ninformed that N.G and Co. Ltd, in fact, wanted to subcontract the work again to \nother companies as it did for previous projects. \nIn addition, Madam Speaker, I must point out that N.G & Co. Ltd. has benefited from \nvarious other “largesses”.  These include – \n(i) \nA sum of Rs 550 million from the MIC for the construction of the Luxury \nRetirement Village, known as Royal Green. It is worth pointing out that the MIC \nwas supposed to support “systemically large, important and viable corporations or \ncompanies incorporated in Mauritius which are financially distressed as a result \nof the COVID-19 pandemic”; \n(ii) \nA 3-acre plot of land in Ebene through Landscope, following which, it contracted \na loan of Rs600 million from the SBM for a building project on a plot of land \nretrieved from Mauritius Post Ltd which was the lessee; \n(iii) At its 7 Exchange Square Building in Ebene, SBM, the very bank that lent money \nto N.G & Co Ltd., acquired several floors and 50 attached parking slots for \nRs283.5 million;  \n(iv) For the same building, 7 Exchange Square, the EDB signed a lease agreement, on \n09 August 2019 for 5,000 square metres of office space and 130 parking slots.  \n\n25 \n \nOn 30 May 2024, the EDB signed a second lease agreement for an additional \noffice space of 170 square metres at the ground-floor of the same building and \nalso for 2 additional parking slots. EDB currently pays Rs4,068,000 per month \nfor this rented space.  So far, the EDB has paid a total rental amount of Rs104.9 \nmillion from December 2022 to date, and a syndic fees of Rs7.2 million; \n(v) \nFSC pays Rs5,174,460 per month to N.G & Co. Ltd for the rental of five floors \nand 135 parking slots at 7 Exchange Square; \n(vi) \na contract between Mauritius Telecom and Royal Green for the provision of \nmedical services by the Royal Green Hospital to employees of MT for an \nestimated amount of Rs13,038,749 for over three years; \n(vii) \nFinancial Support from Industrial Finance Corporation Ltd to the tune of Rs64 \nmillion to Royal Green Healthcare Ltd; \n(viii) \nMauritius Ports Authority granted a lease of 25 years over a plot of 1-hectare of \nland in the port area to NG Marine Services Ltd, which is part of the N.G Group \nof Companies, and \n(ix) \nN.G & Co. Ltd. also benefitted from a lease of State land for its luxury villa \nproject, Asmara at Riviere Noire, from which it pocketed hundreds of millions \nof rupees from the sale of the villas. \nMadam Speaker, the House may also wish to know that on 15 April 2024, a decision \nwas taken by the then government to relocate the office of the Financial Crimes Commission \non the flimsy excuse of infrastructural defects in the building. This was but a ploy to lease the \nland to N.G & Co Ltd. which had already benefitted from the land retrieved forcibly from the \nTamil Cultural Centre. This formed part of the strategy of N.G & Co Ltd to expand its \ndomain over the entire Réduit Triangle with the blessings of the former government. \nMadam Speaker, let me also add a few words about the land scam initiated by the \nmanagement of Landscope Ltd in 2019 – a few months before the General Elections.  \nThis related to a decision of the Board to allocate 550 acres of prime land in a \nstrategically located area at the heart of Côte d’Or City Project under the Landscope \nDevelopment Scheme. This project was estimated at more than Rs25 billion. Despite the fact \nthat following an Expression of Interest exercise, 32 developers were deemed eligible to \nreceive plots, the Board, under the leverage of the Cabinet and the then Prime Minister \npersonally, decided to allocate the land to only two companies, out of which, 250 acres were \nto be given to N.G & Co. Ltd. \n\n26 \n \nMadam Speaker, Mr Gerard Sanspeur, the then Chairperson of Landscope vehemently \nopposed the decision, raising serious concerns about the lack of transparency, fairness and \nprocedural irregularities. He stood firm despite thinly veiled threats for resisting a \nrecommendation of the Cabinet. He insisted that the matter be referred to the State Law \nOffice.  Following the advice of the State Law Office, the Board had to rescind the decision, \nthus aborting what was going to be another scam. Probably, the scam of the century! \nShortly after, Mr Sanspeur resigned as Chairperson of the Board and as Principal \nAdviser to the then Prime Minister. \nMadam Speaker, the House will recall that just before the general elections last year, a \nstrategic plot of land in the area of Anse La Raie beach was allocated to Luxury Suites Ltd, \nanother entity owned by N.G & Co. Ltd. In view of the major public outcry that followed, he \nhad no choice but to abandon the project.    \nMadam Speaker, if we compute the total figures, N.G & Co. Ltd. has so far benefited \naround Rs2 billion from various projects, around Rs205 million for rental of office space to \ngovernment entities, and around Rs1.25 billion as direct financial support from SBM Ltd, the \nMIC, and the Industrial Finance Corporation Ltd. \nIt should be pointed out, Madam Speaker, that Mr Vinash Gopee chaired several bodies, \nincluding – \n1) \nThe Tourism Authority; \n2) \nThe Mauritius Multisports Infrastructure Ltd ; \n3) \nThe Drains Infrastructure Construction Ltd., amongst others. \nMadam Speaker, all the information I have given to the House show clearly that the \nMSM government has systematically, since 2015, weaved a cobweb of corruption, \nmalfeasance, nepotism and cronyism to bleed the country of important resources for their \npersonal advantage. \nThis is but one example of how they fleeced the economy, and left the country in the \nmess that we find ourselves in today. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: No, I am sorry. Time is up! I am sorry, time is up!  \n(Interruptions) \n\n27 \n \nTime is up, hon. Member! So, ... \n(Interruptions) \nNext time! \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members, the Table has been advised that PQ B/540, which was coming just after, \nhas been withdrawn. So, we now move to questions addressed to hon. Ministers. \n(Interruptions) \nI am sorry, hon. Jhummun, but I have to respect – time is up. We will come back! You \nare still young! \nMr Jhummun: I just wanted to know whether a full inquiry will be undertaken. \nMadam Speaker: You do not have the floor! \nWe now move to questions addressed to hon. Ministers.  \nThe hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatres Bornes! \nCOVID-19 PANDEMIC– STC BUILDING – DISINFECTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/540",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 540,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/540) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Rose \nBelle Civil Status Office, he will state if consideration will be given for the relocation thereof \nin a premise of good standard and comprising basic amenities and in the vicinity of the \nHealth Office delivering permits for cremation.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nNATIONAL AGENCY FOR DRUG CONTROL – ESTABLISHMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/541",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 541,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Dr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/541) Dr. R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nNational Agency for Drug Control, he will state the expected date of coming into operation \nthereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: As the hon. Member is aware, the National Agency for Drug Control Act came \ninto force on 15 May 2025. This landmark legislation is the translation of our pledge into \naction as well as reaffirms the commitment of this Government to effectively address the \n\n169 \n \nproblem of drugs.  The Act establishes the National Agency for Drug Control as the apex \ninstitution responsible for drug use prevention and control efforts in Mauritius. \nIn accordance with Section 9 of the Act, the Agency will be administered and managed \nby a Drug Control Board. \nAs previously announced in the House, Mr Samioullah Lauthan, Senior Advisor on \nDrug Policy at my Office, will chair the Drug Control Board. Furthermore, Dr. Fayzal \nSulliman has been appointed Chief Executive Officer of the Agency. As I have already \nmentioned in the House, Dr. Fayzal Sulliman followed a fellowship programme on substance \nabuse at the Johns Hopkins University, USA and has extensive experience working with the \nUNODC, Governments and NGOs in the field of substance abuse, both locally and abroad in \nthe African Region. \nAn amount of Rs70 million has been allocated for the Financial Year 2025-2026 to \nsupport the operational setup of the Agency. I am informed that procurement procedures are \nunderway for securing office space and acquiring the necessary furniture and equipment. The \nDrug Control Board will soon be set up and thereafter the recruitment process of the other \nstaff will be initiated. \nI wish to inform the House that while the physical establishment of the Agency is still \nin progress, substantive work has already begun. A National Drug Control Master Plan \n(2025-2029), in collaboration with the Office of the UN Resident Coordinator in Mauritius, is \nbeing prepared to comprehensively address drug trafficking, substance use, and associated \nharms. As soon as the Drug Control Board is set up, the Master Plan will be finalised. \nThis Master Plan is anchored in principles of inclusivity, human rights, and gender \nresponsiveness, with a particular focus on youth and marginalized communities. Its \noverarching vision is to build a healthier and safer Mauritius through enhanced enforcement \nand strategic interventions aligned with two national priorities – \n• \nA Comprehensive National Drug Prevention Programme. \n• \nA Holistic National Rehabilitation and Reintegration Programme. \nThe Drug Control Board will oversee the implementation of the Master Plan, once \napproved. In line with Section 4(c) of the Act, the National Drug Control Commission, under \nmy chairpersonship, will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating its execution.",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/542",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 542,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/542) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the \ndisinfection of the STC building at Ebene following the COVID-19 pandemic, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the State Trading Corporation, information as to the – \n(a) \nname of the contractor therefor and \n(b) \ncost thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Yeung Sik Yuen: Madam Speaker, I am informed that following the COVID-19 \npandemic, the State Trading Corporation sought the services of its then service provider, \nnamely Mauriclean Ltd to disinfect its premises in view of resumption of work and other \neconomic activities in May 2020. However, the latter was not operational during this period.  \nI am further informed that the STC then launched a tender for the decontamination of \nits Head Office at Ebène, its two warehouses in Mer Rouge and Roche Bois, and for its fleet \nof vehicles to seven potential bidders. Of these seven companies, six submitted their \nquotations which were as follows – \n(i) \nServices 2000 Ltd. for Rs68,000; \n\n28 \n \n(ii) \nAlpha Pest Management for Rs99,215; \n(iii) \nNeeteeselect Ltd for Rs91,000 during normal hours and Rs121,000 for odd \nhours; \n(iv) \nPajelo Cleaning Services Ltd for Rs176,525; \n(v) \nFinal Cleaning Ltd for Rs565,539, and \n(vi) \nAqua Science and Technology Ltd for Rs61,399.11 \nBased on the evaluation exercise carried out by the STC, the contract was awarded to \nNeeteeselect Ltd, which was found by the STC to be lowest substantially responsive bidder \nfor the price of Rs121,000.  \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed that in June 2020, the STC carried out a second \ndecontamination exercise in one of its warehouses and its vehicles. The STC availed itself of \nthe services of Neeteeselect directly on the same terms and conditions as the first contract \nfor a total value of Rs85,000.  \nI am further informed by the STC that based on the certification of a Health and Safety \nOfficer of the STC that the decontamination exercise was successfully carried out in his \npresence. The total cost of Rs206,000 for the disinfection carried out by Neeteeselect Ltd. at \nthe STC post-COVID was paid to the contractor. \nMadam Speaker: Supplementary! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Can the hon. Minister inform \nthe House whether he is aware that the manual workers of the STC are claiming that they did \nthe cleaning and they were promised to get paid? Unfortunately, they did not get any \nremuneration for the cleaning they did at the STC’s Head Office building at Ebène, STC \nwarehouse at Mer Rouge and STC warehouse at Roche Bois. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister! \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Madam Speaker, I have also heard the same version. However, \nthe management of the STC is insisting that the disinfection was carried out by the \nemployees of Neeteeselect. \nOn the other hand, the manual workers at the STC are claiming that they did the job \nwithout any remuneration which was promised by the then management of the STC. The \nSTC however, confirmed that the maintenance section and a few handy workers actually \ncarried out the following – \n(i) \ninternal and external cleanings at the STC head office; \n\n29 \n \n(ii) \ninternal and external cleanings at shed A and Roche Bois warehouses. \nMadam Speaker, I will request the board of STC to do an investigation and the matter \nwill be referred to the FCC if need be. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, thank you. Hon. Juman.  \nMr Juman: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can I know from the hon. Minister the date \nof incorporation of the company, nature of business and also the date the contract was \nawarded? \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Madam Speaker, I have the information from the registrar of \ncompanies. The date incorporated was 21st April 2020. The name of the company – \nNeeteeselect Ltd. The category is domestic. The status is live under winding up process and \nthe contract was awarded on the next month which was in May 2020. \nMs Anquetil: Shame! \nMadam Speaker: After incorporation you mean? Next month after incorporation? \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Yes. \nMs Anquetil : Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Can the Minister inform the \nHouse who is the General Manager and their shareholders of the Neeteeselect Ltd? Thank \nyou. \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Madam Speaker, as per the Registrar of Companies Mrs \nKeshwaree Poonyth is the GM and the sole shareholder is Ms Neeta Nuckchhed. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, a last one.  \nMs Anquetil: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Would the Minister inform the House if the \ncontractor is specialised or accredited in bio-hazard or pandemic related sanitation? Thank \nyou. \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Madam Speaker, I do not think so as per the Registrar of \nCompanies, it is written domestic and nature private. I am also informed from the STC that \nno due diligence was carried out. I am informed that the National Audit office even raised \nconcerns that the STC did not do so. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, the Table has been informed that PQ B/543 has been \nwithdrawn. \nMOTORWAY M4 PROJECT, PHASE 2 – PONT BLANC TO BEL AIR – PROJECT \nDETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/543",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 543,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Dr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/543) Dr. R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the proposed \nimplementation of Phase 2 of the Motorway M4 Project, particularly the segment connecting \n\n30 \n \nPont Blanc to Bel Air, he will state the projected timeline therefor and scope of works \nthereof, indicating if consideration will be given for the communities living in the South-East \nparticularly concerned therewith to be consulted prior thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMadam Speaker: So, we move to the hon. Second Member for Quartier Militaire & \nMoka! Hon. Dr. Ms Thannoo. \n \nFORT GEORGE – THERMAL POWER STATION IMPLEMENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/544",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 544,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/544) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the proposed \nimplementation of a new Thermal Power Station with the Combined Cycle Gas Turbine at \nFort George, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Electricity Board, \ninformation as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden : Madame la présidente, j’ai été informé que la Central Electricity \nBoard étudie un projet d’installation de deux turbines à gaz de 40 MW chacune possiblement \nà Fort George à proximité de la centrale électrique existante.  \nLe projet comprendrait la conception, la fourniture, l’installation et les essais et la mise \nen service de deux turbines à gaz en configuration à cycle ouvert. Ces turbines pourront être \nultérieurement converties en turbine à gaz à cycle combiné offrant un rendement accru. \nMadame la présidente, cette proposition a été évoquée suite aux défis auxquels la CEB \na dû faire face au cours des mois d’été de 2024/2025 en raison d’une augmentation \nsignificative de la demande d’électricité et des pannes fréquentes des moteurs, des \nproducteurs d’électricité indépendant et de la CEB en raison de l’entretien et de réparation. \nLes éventuelles turbines à gaz proposées seraient utilisées par le CEB pour répondre à la \ndemande de pointe du soir et servir de secours d’urgence pour les projets d’énergies \nrenouvelables. \nMadame la présidente, mon ministère et le CEB travaillent actuellement sur des \nmesures à court, moyen et long terme pour assurer surtout la sécurité énergétique et la \ntransition énergétique verte. Le CEB se concentre actuellement chez la mise en œuvre des \nmesures urgentes pour répondre à la demande électricité pour la prochaine saison estivale. \nParallèlement, les travaux sont menés sur le lancement de nouveaux programmes et projets \nvisant à dynamiser les secteurs des énergies renouvelables tout en développant des projets \ndurables à long terme pour assurer une grande résilience du secteur énergétique. \nMadam Speaker: Merci. Yes. Dr. Ms Thannoo. \n\n31 \n \nDr. Ms Thannoo: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can we have an indication of the time \nframework for implementation of the project, please? \nMr Assirvaden : Je voudrais préciser que ce genre de projet prenne deux à trois ans \npour se matérialiser. Nous sommes au stade de réflexion en ce qui concerne le court terme, \nle moyen terme et le long terme. Dans le court terme, ce sera la sécurité énergétique du pays. \nDans le moyen terme, des projets tels que deux ans - deux ans et demi et dans le très long \nterme, quatre ans, cinq ans pour la vision énergie du pays. \nMadam Speaker: Yes alright. So, now we move to the Second Member for Belle \nRose & Quatre Bornes. \n \nHILLCREST AVENUE, QUATRE-BORNES – TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT & \nROAD SAFETY UNIT – GREENING & EMBELLISHMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/545",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 545,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/545) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, \nin regard to the Hillcrest Avenue, in Quatre-Bornes, he will state if his Ministry is in \npresence of views and/or recommendations from the Traffic Management and Road Safety \nUnit in relation to the greening and embellishment thereof and, if so, indicate the actions, if \nany, taken in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Mr Bhagwan: Madam Speaker, according to information available, works related to \nthe cleaning and embellishment of Hillcrest Avenue, Sodnac and classified roads were \nimplemented in the year 2022 at a cost of around Rs3 million. Consultations were then held \nby the Ministry, with relevant authorities namely the then Minister of National Infrastructure \nand Community Development, the RDA, the Energy Services Division, the Municipal \nCouncil of Quatre Bornes, including the Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit. \nMadam Speaker, the Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit had submitted some \nrecommendations for the project namely, with regard to proper visibility at each junction, \nheight of trees and bushes as well as flowerpots so that they do not constitute a road safety \nhazard. All these recommendations were taken on board by the then Ministry. \nMadam Speaker, I received many representations from inhabitants of the region and \nalso the MPs of the region with regard to road safety and the removal of the flowerpots. My \nministry, therefore, intends to convene a stakeholders’ meeting to reassess the project. My \ncolleague of the Constituency No. 18 will be consulted accordingly. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, I am sorry. Are you alright? Yes, one question. \n\n32 \n \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie Madame la présidente – R 3 millions ! R 3 \nmillions dépensées pour des pots de fleurs qui nuisent à la visibilité et mettent en danger les \nusagers de L’Avenue Hillcrest. C’est inacceptable!  \nWill the Minister inform the House whether, he intends to meet with all the relevant \nstakeholders to reassess the situation and take the appropriate corrective measures in the \ninterest of the public safety? Thank you. \nMr Bhagwan: Madam Speaker, I have said so. I myself am not satisfied, but we are \nmaintaining what has been done. I cannot say it is a mess, but it is creating a lot of problems \nfor all those who reside and use the Hillcrest Avenue, which is a classified road. My \ncolleague, hon. Gunness has also received complaints. So, we will be looking into the \nproject and we will see what can be done to remedy the situation and do something better. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nHon. Members, we have been advised that PQ B/546 and PQ B/561 have been \nwithdrawn.  \nSo, now I move to the hon. First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne Longue. \n \nBAIE DU TOMBEAU – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT – \nCOMPULSORY ACQUISITION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/546",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 546,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/546) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses &Triolet) asked \nthe Honourable Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the land situated \naround the Wastewater Treatment Plant at Baie du Tombeau, he will state the reasons why \nhis Ministry is pursuing the compulsory acquisition thereof for the proposed relocation of \nthe Waste Water Treatment Plant of Roche Bois thereat in the absence of any such project \nhaving been presented to the Ministry of Environment.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPRIMARY SCHOOLS – AUTISTIC CHILDREN – DEDICATED \nCLASSROOMS PROVISION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/547",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 547,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/547) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the \nprimary schools, he will state if consideration will be given for the provision thereat of \ndedicated classrooms with special facilities to accommodate children suffering from autism.  \n\n33",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that children with \ndisabilities including 69 children with autism are already being accommodated in SEN \nintegrated units set up in 12 primary schools. These 12 SEN integrated units are headed by \ntrained educators to cater for learners with autism and have dedicated classrooms with the \nfollowing facilities –  \n1. \nTherapy services; \n2. \nHot meals; \n3. \nUse of tablets; \n4. \nFree transport facilities by bus is provided to the learners and arefund system for \nbus fare for accompanying parents is provided by the Ministry Social \nIntegration, Social Security and National Solidarity, and \n5. \nSupport of each assistance and carers. \nActivities such as music day, sports day, educational outings are also organised for \nthese learners. \nMoreover, there are also around 30 learners with autism who are accommodated in the \ninclusive setup in the mainstream primary schools. These learners are also provided with the \nsupport of Teacher Assistants and Carers and benefit from all extra-curricular activities at the \nlevel of the schools. In addition, all learners with autism in both SEN Integrated Units and in \nthe mainstream primary schools attend therapy services at the seven Special Education Needs \nResource Development Centres and the three Special Education Needs Resource \nDevelopment Units as scheduled by the Allied Professionals. Transport facilities are provided \nto them accordingly. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to highlight that in Budget 2025-2026, my Ministry has been \nallocated funds to a tune of Rs8 m. for the upgrading of existing seven Special Education \nNeeds Resource Development Centres and the setting up of five additional Special Education \nNeeds Resource Development Units and SEN Integrated Units in primary schools. All \nnecessary facilities will be extended to these units. My Ministry will start the necessary \nprocedures for the setting up and upgrading of the new units.  \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Are you happy, Ms Savabaddy? Yes!  \nHon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle, Mr Seeburn! \n \n\n34 \n \nSMALL SUGAR CANE PLANTERS – REGISTRATION & PRODUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/548",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 548,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/548) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the small sugar cane planters, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to – \n(a) the number thereof registered in 2014, indicating the total amount of crops \nharvested and sugar produced in the same year, and  \n(b) whether there has been any increase in the number thereof in 2024, indicating the \ntotal amount of crops harvested and sugar produced as at November 2024.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, hon. Member. Madam Speaker, I wish to apprise \nthe House that according to the MCIA Act, a small planter is defined as – \n“(…) a planter cultivating cane over an extent of less than 10 hectares;” \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Sugar Insurance Fund \nBoard that in 2014, there were 14,807 small sugarcane planters registered and they harvested \n863,113 tons of sugarcane, which produced 65,759 tons of sugar.  \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that there were 8,037 small \nplanters registered in 2024 and they harvested 396,405 tons of sugarcane, which produced \n30,273 tons of sugar. It is evident from the abovementioned figures that 6,770 small \nsugarcane planters have abandoned their fields. A decrease of 46% which has resulted in a \ndecrease of 54% in the sugarcane harvested and sugar produced. \nMadam Speaker, the production of sugar has drastically fallen during these ten years, \nnot only due to natural calamities and loss of market share, but also to the fall in the price of \nsugar that has driven many small planters to abandon their lands. The rise in the cost of \nmechanisation, the decrease in local labour force in the sugar industry and the increase in \ntransfer of prime agricultural land in favour of infrastructure has largely contributed to the \nfall in sugar production.  \nThere was a clear lack of commitment from the then authorities also to restructure the \nsugarcane industry. The Government has made it a priority to revamp the sugarcane industry, \nto drive small planters as well as the corporate sector to move again, in a more structured \nmanner in the plantation of sugarcane and to make the sugar industry attractive again. \n\n35 \n \nAs announced in the Budget 2025-2026, the total revenue per ton of sugar will be \nincreased to Rs35,000 so as to encourage small planters towards replantation. Funding under \nthe Cane Replantation Scheme and Cane Replantation Revolving Fund have been enhanced \nin the budget to stimulate further production. These measures are expected to attract around \n20,000 arpents under cultivation.  \nThe targeted five-year objective for sugarcane production has been set at 300,000 tons. \nSmall sugarcane planters are important for the strategic initiative. Therefore, the Ministry will \nensure that they get full access to support and schemes be made available. These measures \nwill address and will tackle the cost of cane production issue and boost profitability to \nalleviate the difficulties presently being faced by small sugarcane planters. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nThe hon. Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nCHIEF EXECUTIVE & DEPUTY CHIEF EXECUTIVE POSTS – APPOINTMENTS, \nVACANCIES & LEGAL PROCEEDINGS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/549",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 549,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/549) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the posts of Chief \nExecutive and Deputy Chief Executive respectively in the local authorities, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain – \n(a) \nthe lists of appointees since December 2014 to date, and  \n(b) \ninformation as to the – \n(i) \nnumber of existing vacancies in each position in each local authority, and \n(ii) \noutcome of the cases lodged at the Supreme Court/Public Bodies Appeal \nTribunal regarding the appointment of two Temporary Chief Executives and \nof two Temporary Deputy Chief Executives.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by \nthe Local Government Service Commission (LGSC) that since December 2014 to date, 10 \nChief Executives and 11 Deputy Chief Executives have been appointed. The list of the Chief \nExecutives and Deputy Chief Executives who have been appointed is being tabled. \nAs to part (b) (i) of the question, there are two vacancies in the grade of Chief \nExecutive, namely at the Municipal Council of Curepipe and the District Council of Savanne. \nThere are four vacancies in the grade of Deputy Chief Executive, namely at the Municipal \n\n36 \n \nCouncil of Quatre Bornes, the Municipal Council of Vacoas-Phoenix, the District Council of \nMoka and the District Council of Black River. \nMadam Speaker, arrangement has been made for the assignment of duties at the level of \nChief Executive and Deputy Chief Executive on the basis of administrative convenience, \npending recruitment in the respective grades by the Local Government Service Commission. \nThe vacancies in the above grades have already been reported to the Local Government \nService Commission on 11 December 2023, on 13 May 2025 and on 10 June 2025. \nMadam Speaker, I shall now answer to part (b) (ii) of the question for the post of Chief \nExecutive. Following the appointment of Mr R.K. Nursing and Mr D. Reechaye to the post of \nChief Executive in a temporary capacity, Mrs T. Narsinghen lodged an application for leave \nto apply for a judicial review against that decision and decision-making process of the Local \nGovernment Service Commission. She lodged that case before the Supreme Court in view of \nthe fact that the Local Government Service Commission did not issue a notification for \nappointment, as the recruitment exercise was made through both limited and open \ncompetition. \nAs such, Mrs Narsinghen could not appeal to the Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal. She \nsought redress from the Supreme Court by way of judicial review. However, the Supreme \nCourt refused to grant leave to apply for judicial review and set aside the application on 10 \nOctober 2023. The Supreme Court was of the view that Mrs Narsinghen circumvented her \nright of appeal before the Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal and resorted directly to judicial \nreview, which is a discretionary remedy of last resort. Following the judgment of the \nSupreme Court, Mrs Narsinghen then made an appeal before the Public Bodies Appeal \nTribunal. The case was fixed for argument before the Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal on 10 \nMay 2024. \nMr Nursing and Mr Reechaye objected to the appeal of Mrs Narsinghen on account that \nher application was time barred. The Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal ruled, and I quote – \n“The date of the aforesaid Supreme Court judgment should be considered as at date of \nappellant was duly notified and that the 21 days should start running as from the date of \njudgement was delivered. The judgement was delivered on 10 October 2023 and the \nappeal was lodged on 27 October 2023, that is, within the statutory delay.”   \nIn view thereof, the Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal decided to set aside the ground of \nobjection of Mr Nursing and Mr Reechaye and decided to hear the appeal. A ruling was \n\n37 \n \ndelivered on 10 May 2024 that the Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal has the jurisdiction to hear \nthe appeal. Following the decision of the Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal, both temporary \nChief Executives applied for a judicial review against this ruling of the Public Bodies Appeal \nTribunal. Both cases are before the Supreme Court. \nAlthough the Local Government Service Commission lodged an application for a \njudicial review, on the advice of the State Law Office, against the ruling of the Public Bodies \nAppeal Tribunal, on 21 April 2025, it withdrew its application on a point of merit. \nMadam Speaker, for the post of Deputy Chief Executive, during the first selection \nexercise on 07 September 2021, the Local Government Service Commission appointed Mrs \nOozeer as Deputy Chief Executive. Mr Bassawon Assistant Chief Executive, lodged an \nappeal on 04 October 2021at the Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal against the decision of the \nCommission to appoint Mrs Oozeer to the post of Deputy Chief Executive in a temporary \ncapacity at the District Council of Rivière du Rempart, with effect from 15 September 2021.  \nIn its determination dated on 10 March 2023, the Tribunal had quashed the decision of \nthe Commission in appointing the correspondent to the post of Deputy Chief Executive and \nremitted back the matter to this Office in accordance with section 8 (4) (b) of the Public \nBodies Appeal Tribunal Act 2008. \nIn a letter dated 13 March 2023, Mrs Oozeer informed that she would not apply for a \njudicial review regarding the decision of the Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal.  \nIn the meantime, another vacancy occurred in the grade. The post of Deputy Chief \nExecutive was readvertised on 23 March 2023 and the closing date was 05 April 2023. The \nCommission had, on 04 May 2023, appointed Mrs Oozeer and Mrs Dyal as Deputy Chief \nExecutive in a temporary capacity at the District Council of Grand Port and District Council \nof Rivière du Rempart, respectively, as from the date of their assumption of duty.  \nThe appointees assumed duty on 05 May 2023. Mr Bassawon lodged an appeal to the \nPublic Bodies Appeal Tribunal on 13 May 2023 against the decision of the Commission to \nappoint Mrs Oozeer and Mrs Dyal to the post of Deputy Chief Executive in a temporary \ncapacity in the District Council of Grand Port and Rivière du Rempart, respectively, with \neffect from 05 May 2023.  \n\n38 \n \nThe matter was heard before the Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal on 12 September 2023. \nIn its determination No. D/18 of 2023, dated 24 October 2023, the Tribunal quashed the \ndecision of the Local Government Service Commission.  \nOn 09 November 2023, the Local Government Service Commission made an \napplication for judicial review against this decision of the Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal. \nMrs Oozeer and Mrs Dyal also applied for a judicial review regarding the determination of \nthe Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal. The matter was fixed for argument on 19 July 2024 \nbefore the Supreme Court on the motion for a stay of the decision of the Public Bodies \nAppeal Tribunal. \nIn a ruling on 13 June 2025, the Supreme Court quashed the decision of the Public \nBodies Appeal Tribunal and ruled that Mrs Oozeer and Mrs Dyal should be maintained in \ntheir post of Deputy Chief Executive.  \nFollowing the decision of the Supreme Court, the Local Government Service \nCommission has advised that the procedures are being initiated to maintain Mrs Oozeer and \nMrs Dyal in their post of Deputy Chief Executive in a temporary capacity.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, Mr Caserne! Alright. The hon. Second Member for \nQuartier Militaire and Moka! \nILLEGAL MORCELLEMENTS – VICTIMS OF PROMOTERS – WATER \nCONNECTION – CWA APPLICATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/550",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 550,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/550) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to illegal morcellements, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as \nto whether consideration will be given for the favourable consideration of applications for \nwater connection submitted by the victims of promoters thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, j’ai été informé par la Central Water Authority \nque, conformément à sa politique établie, la CWA n’est pas en mesure de traiter des \ndemandes de raccordement à l’eau dans des cas de morcellements illégaux, en particulier en \nl’absence d’infrastructures hydrauliques adéquates. \n\n39 \n \nMadame la présidente, les morcellements illégaux sont des parcelles de terrains \nsubdivisées et vendues par des promoteurs sans scrupules en violation de la loi sur le \nmorcellement et du règlement sur l’urbanisme et l’aménagement et sans les permis et \nautorisations nécessaires. Les victimes, malheureusement, de ces promoteurs sont induites en \nerreur et l’acheteur croyant que le développement est conforme aux règles. Dans certains cas, \non m’informe que même des faux permis de morcellement ont été délivrés. \nLe ministère du Logement et de l’aménagement du territoire m’informe que des \nmesures ont été prises pour remédier à la situation qui a touché, malheureusement, environ \n300 propriétaires fonciers en mars dernier. Les formalités nécessaires sont effectuées par \nl’Unité des morcellements du ministère du Logement. Cette mesure facilitera la mise en place \nd’infrastructures et de services publics adéquats tels que l’approvisionnement en eau pour ces \nlotissements. \nMadame la présidente, une fois le développement régularisé, la CWA peut envisager de \ntraiter les demandes de raccordements en eau, sous réserve que les infrastructures d’eau \nrequises soient mises en place. \nMadam Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet! \nIMPORT OF VEGETABLES – YEARLY STATISTICS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/551",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 551,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/551) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to fresh vegetables, he will state the import volumes thereof over the past two years, \nindicating the forecast thereof for the current year compared to the local production thereof.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: I thank the hon. Member for this question. \nMadam Speaker, from information obtained from Statistics Mauritius, the importation \nof vegetables over the past few years has increased from 25,000 tonnes to 25,280 tonnes in \n2023, to 34,644 tonnes in 2024, representing an increase by 37% within a single year. \nHowever, the rising trend can be attributed to adverse climate conditions that the country has \nhad to face such as cyclone Belal in 2024.  \nThe larger shares of these imports comprise potatoes, onions, garlics, which are \nstrategic crops. The biggest suppliers of imported produce are from Egypt, India, \n\n40 \n \nNetherlands, and China. Imported vegetables serve niche markets such as the hospitality \nsector and also to palliate to shortages which occur when cultivations are affected by adverse \nclimatic conditions, namely cyclones, flash floods and droughts. Additionally, potatoes and \nonions are imported as they cannot be cultivated year-round due to our agro-climatic \ncondition. \nFor the year 2025, Madam Speaker, despite a low start due to the prolonged dry spell, \nthe forecasted local production of vegetables is estimated at 179,210 tonnes. This will be \nsufficient to meet local demand, except for strategic crops like potatoes and onions, for which \nthe Agricultural Marketing Board is expecting to import some 13,000 tonnes each to cater for \non-season shortages. \nMadam Speaker, to make Mauritius food secure nation, the measures enunciated in the \nBudget for consolidation of the agricultural sector speak for themselves and action is being \naccordingly. There is a whole set of incentives that I will circulate to the hon. Member. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much, Minister. Yes, Mr Rookny! \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, can the Minister, taking into consideration the current \ndetailed prices of carrots and tomatoes which are, presently, standing at approximately Rs200 \nper kilo and Rs320 per kilo, respectively, advise whether his Ministry will consider the \nliberalisation of the importation of vegetables, with a view to better match supply with \ndemand and thereby help bring down the price of vegetables on the local market? \nDr. Boolell: I am for liberalisation, subject that there is regularity and predictability but \nyou know as well as I do that some growers – I would not say that they are unscrupulous – \nare involved in price fixing. I, together with my colleagues, MPs from the Constituency No. \n18, make it a point to go to the market on Saturday, to the Market Fair in Quatre Bornes; and \nas and when I have available time, I also go to the Central Market in Port Louis.  \nI am not saying that the prices are as high as the figures you have cited and given but, \ncertainly, if ever, there are unscrupulous growers taking advantage on fleecing consumers, \nthe matter can also be referred to the Minister responsible for consumer.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister. I think it is now Dr. Ms Thannoo, Second \nMember for Quartier Militaire and Moka. \n\n41 \n \nCLEANER’S POST – AMENDMENT IN LEGISLATION – ELIGIBILITY \nCRITERIA",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/552",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 552,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/552) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to the post of cleaner \nin cleaning companies, he will state if consideration will be given for amendments to be \nbrought to the existing legislation with a view to substituting the present minimum eligibility \ncriteria of a PSAC qualification by a practice-oriented health and safety course delivered in \nKreol Morisyen.",
      "answer": "Mr Uteem: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the Cleaning Enterprises Employees \n(Remuneration) Regulation 2019, made under section 93 of the Employment Relation Act of \n2008, do not contain any provision prescribing minimum qualification for the post of \ncleaners. Presently, each cleaning company is free to set its own minimum qualification when \nrecruiting cleaners. \nI am also informed that during the last comprehensive review of the cleaning sector \nconducted in 2011-2012 by the National Remuneration Board, no representations were \nreceived from stakeholders pertaining to a minimum qualification requirement for cleaners.  \nAs regards the public sector, the qualification requirement for employees engaged in \ncleaning activities are as follows – \n• \nGeneral Workers should be literate; \n• \nHandy Workers should hold a certificate of primary education, now Primary \nSchool Achievement Certificate (PSAC), and \n• \nOffice Auxiliaries should possess the Cambridge School Certificate or equivalent. \nShould a representation be made for the provision of a minimum requirement for \ncleaners in a cleaning enterprise, Employees Remuneration Regulation 2019’s consideration \nwill be given thereto. \nMadam Speaker: That’s fine?  \nThe next one is the First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue! \n \n \n\n42 \n \nCOMMUNITY & SOCIAL WELFARE CENTRES – QUANTITY & ELECTION \nPROCEDURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/553",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 553,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/553) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the \nCommunity and Social Welfare Centres respectively, she will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Sugar Industry Labour Welfare Fund, information as to the – \n(a)  number thereof, and  \n(b)  procedures established for the election of Chairpersons and Members of the \nCommittees thereof.",
      "answer": "Ms Navarre-Marie: Madam Speaker, the Sugar Industry Labour Welfare Fund \n(SILWF) is responsible for community centres. Social welfare centres fall under the purview \nof the Social Welfare Division of my Ministry.  \nMadam Speaker, with your permission, I will provide my reply in connection with \ncommunity centres. I am informed that there is a total number of 138 community centres \nacross the island.  \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, the Sugar Industry Labour Welfare Fund Act \ndoes not provide for committees to manage the community centres. However, in a spirit of \ngood governance, Community Development Associations (CDA) are established in \ncommunity centres and are aligned with the provision of Section 4 of the Government Social \nWelfare Centres Act of 1961, which regulates the establishment of social welfare committees. \nMadam Speaker, accordingly, Community Development Associations are established \nand comprised – \n1. \na Community Development Officer who serves as ex-officio member, and \n2. \nmembers who are appointed by the Minister on the recommendation of the Sugar \nIndustry Labour Welfare Fund. \nThe Minister also appoints a Chairperson among the association. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMs Savabaddy: Merci, Madame la présidente. L’honorable ministre peut-elle \nexpliquer à la Chambre comment se font les appels à candidature à ce sujet ? Est-ce que les \n\n43 \n \nmembres de l’Assemblée nationale sont consultés à cet effet et quelle autorité supervise ces \nélections ? Merci. \nMs Navarre-Marie: Madam Speaker, il n’y a pas d’élection as such. \nMs Savabaddy: Nomination? \nMs Navarre-Marie: No. Consultations are carried out with community leaders of the \nregion falling in the vicinity of the centre. \nMadam Speaker: PQ B/554 has been withdrawn. \nBASIC RETIREMENT PENSION – FUNDS DISBURSED (2024-2025)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/554",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 554,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/554) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity whether, in \nregard to the Basic Retirement Pension, he will, state the quantum of funds disbursed to \nbeneficiaries thereof since July 2024 to date.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMadam Speaker: Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle, Mr Ramdass! \nSOCIAL WELFARE CENTRES – VACANCIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/555",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 555,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/555) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the Social \nWelfare Centres, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Sugar Industry Labour \nWelfare Fund, in each case, information as to the number of existing vacancies, giving details \nthereof and indicating when same will be filled.",
      "answer": "Ms Navarre-Marie: Thank you. Madam Speaker, social welfare centres fall under the \npurview of the Social Welfare Division of my Ministry. \nAs regards the existing vacancies at the Sugar Industry Labour Welfare Fund, \ninformation is being compiled and a copy will be placed in the Library of the National \nAssembly. Once the Finance Bill 2025 is adopted by the National Assembly and subject to \nthe availability of funds, necessary arrangements will be made by the Sugar Industry Labour \nWelfare Fund to consider filling any existing vacancies. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \n\n44 \n \nThe hon. First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nPUBLIC HOSPITALS – MEDICAL FILES LOSS – PREVENTIVE MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/556",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 556,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/556) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the public hospitals, \nhe will state the number of reported cases of loss of patients’ medical files, since November \n2024 to date, giving a breakdown thereof per hospital, indicating –  \n(a) \nin such cases – \n (i)  how patients are treated and handled, and \n (ii)  the actions taken, if any, against officers responsible therefor, and  \n(b)  the measures being envisaged to curb the recurrence thereof pending the coming \ninto operation of the proposed e-Health system.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I am informed that as at date, for a population of 1.2 \nmillion people in Mauritius, there are about 7,400,000 casualty cards and some 2,897,000 \npatient files in the Health Records Department. The documents are spread across 109 \ncommunity health centres, 18 area health centres, 12 mediclinics, 2 community hospitals, 5 \nregional hospitals, 2 district hospitals and 6 specialised hospitals.  \nAmong the 7,400,000 casualty cards, around 1,078,000 are active. For 2,897,000 \npatient files, some 1,712,000 are active. Some 80,300 active patients’ files are handled at the \nlevel of hospitals every day. The proper recording of the casualty cards and patient files is \ncarried out by 197 officers of the Health Records Cadre. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (b) of the question, I am informed that from November \n2024 till date, 19 patient files are found missing, of which, two have been reported lost to the \nPolice. In the meantime, four of them have been recovered while the search is still ongoing \nfor the remaining ones.  \nOn the other hand, 24 casualty cards and 349 patient files were unavailable when \nrequired as they were in use in other departments within the hospitals. These medical records \nare ultimately recovered by the Health Records Department. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a)(i) of the question, I wish to inform the House \nthat all patients whose original files are presently unavailable are provided with appropriate \n\n45 \n \ncare and treatment on the same day within the least possible delay by resorting to available \nreports, prescriptions and temporary files until such times that the main file is found.  \nDespite the used number of medical records and movement of files within various \ndepartments and hospitals and other medical facilities, officers are doing their best to ensure \nthat these files are properly tracked and kept, and the percentage of human error is almost \nzero. \nMadam Speaker, concerning part (a)(ii) of the question, the attention of responsible \nofficers is always drawn to be more cautious while manipulating patient medical records. \nSenior Health Record Officers are required to ensure that their officers are familiar with and \nstrictly adhere to medical record procedures with a view to ensuring that medical records do \nnot go missing. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (b) of the question, health records’ staff are required to \nreport all cases of missing patient files immediately to the Supervisors. These are recorded in \nregister of missing patient file. All hospitals have dedicated experienced officers who deal \nwith missing files until they are available. If ever after thorough search a file is not available, \nthose officers are required to report all cases of missing files to the Police and to inform the \nheadquarters accordingly. \nMadam Speaker, I am glad to inform the House that Phase 1 of the e-Health Project \nwill soon be launched at the new hospital at Flacq. In the first phase of the roll-out of the \nproject, a Patient Administration System (PAS) would be implemented as well as a patient \nportal. The project will subsequently be extended to other regional district and specialised \nhospitals and primary health care centres, including mediclinics. \nMadam Speaker, the implementation of e-Health Project will further consolidate ‘one \npatient, one record concept’ and will ensure availability of medical patient data in real time. \nThis technological advancement is expected to eliminate challenges associated with lost or \nmisplaced medical files, offering instant access to crucial patient data with a simple click.  \nThe adoption of e-Health system brings a multitude of transformational change as to \nhow healthcare will be delivered and managed. One of the most immediate and impactful \nadvantages is the elimination of issues related to lost or misplace medical files. With the e-\nHealth system, all medical information will be recorded digitally in a centralised and secure \ndatabase. This will ensure instant and reliable access to crucial patient data for authorised \n\n46 \n \nhealthcare providers, regardless of the location or time of the day. This immediate \naccessibility is vital in emergencies during consultations or when a patient moves between \ndifferent health care centres. \nMadam Speaker, what the previous government has not been able to do in ten years’ \ntime is being accomplished by this Government in eight months. This is what we call real \nchange! \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMs Savabaddy: Merci, Madame la présidente. On parle ici du cœur, du mal dans les \ninstitutions de santé publique. En attendant le e-Health, le ministre a-t-il envisagé une \nformation du personnel pour éviter ce genre de désagréments ? Merci.  \nMadam Speaker: Training.  \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I have repeatedly explained that they are undergoing \ntraining regularly. And I am repeatedly drawing their attention but being given that there is a \nlack of medical officers, I have been mentioning since the very beginning – 1500 nurses are \nmissing; we don’t have record officers. One record officer is dealing with about 50-60 files \non average per day. That becomes extremely impossible and that is the reason why, instead of \nwarning them, threatening them, I am trying to encourage them. I am trying to get them all \ntogether because within months, we are going to move from one system to a modern system.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister! Yes. Dr. Aumeer, the expert. \nDr. Aumeer:  As part of the question to curb the recurrence of pending, loss files or \nmissing files, can I ask the hon. Minister whether he will consider having a dedicated desk at \nall out-patients departments in regional hospital on a temporary basis to assist relatives and \npatients who retrieve notes until and so forth the e-Health System become fully available?  \nThank you.  \nMr Bachoo: You have already taken words from my mouth. In fact, in my budget \nspeech, this is the proposition that I am going to make.  \nMadam Speaker: Fantastic! You will all get a chance to have a bite at this issue, \nwhich is very important.  \nI have got five minutes left. You insist on another question? Yes, alright!  \n\n47 \n \nMs Savabaddy: Madame la présidente, le ministre peut-il s’assurer que le personnel \nmédical ait une approche humaine et ne refuse pas des soins aux patients mêmes si on ne \nretrouve pas son dossier ? Merci. \nMadam Speaker: He mentioned that.  \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, all of us are human beings. At times, when they get \noverloaded, this happens to all of us. So, at times, it does happen and in such a case, we can’t \ndo otherwise because we are human beings.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister! \nI have got four minutes left. So, I will try a last question.  \nThat would be for the Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue. \nROUNDABOUTS – MAINTENANCE & EMBELLISHMENT – AWARDED \nCONTRACT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/557",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 557,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/557) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the roundabouts \non motorways and classified roads, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nRoad Development Authority, the lists thereof – \n(a)  presently embellished and maintained by private companies, indicating in each \ncase, the – \n(i)     name of the company, and  \n(ii) \ncontract period, and  \n(b)  not embellished and maintained by private companies.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Road Development Authority \nthat the maintenance and embellishment of roundabouts located along motorways and \nclassified roads are undertaken either by private companies, government entities or local \nauthorities. \nRoundabout sponsorship is allocated on a first-come, first-served basis for an initial \nperiod of three years with renewal possibilities subject to the satisfaction of the RDA. \nPresently, there is a total of 158 roundabouts located on motorways and classified \nroads. Details regarding sponsorship are as follows – \n\n48 \n \n(i) \nOut of the 40 roundabouts situated along motorways, 34 are being embellished \nand maintained through a sponsorship by private companies, and  \n(ii) \nOut of 118 roundabouts located on classified roads, 61 are sponsored by private \ncompanies.  \nWith regard to part (a) (i) and (a) (ii) of the question, with your permission Madam \nSpeaker, I am tabling the information as requested by the hon. Member, in respect of the list \nof roundabouts sponsored by private companies. \nI am also tabling information as requested in part (b) of the question regarding the \nremaining roundabouts not embellished and maintained by private companies, namely 6 on \nmotorways and 57 on classified roads.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister! Yes, maybe I will have a last one.  \nThe hon. Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d'Or, Mr Beejan! \nBAMBOUS STREET, VALE – PIPE-LAYING WORKS – PROJECT COMPLETION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/558",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 558,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/558) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the pipe-laying works \nundertaken at Bambous Street, in Vale, in 2024, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Central Water Authority, information as to the expected completion date of the \nresurfacing works of the roads damaged in the course thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, la Central Water Authority m’a informé \nqu’environ 1.7 km de tuyaux en amiante-ciment ont été remplacés dans la région de Lower \nVale, le long de Bambous Road, Agowan Street, Fareed Lane et Seetanah Road. Cependant, \nles travaux de réfection de la route n’ont pas été réalisés.  \nMadame la présidente, comme je l’ai expliqué en réponse aux questions précédentes, \nPQ B/152, B/219 et B/308, la raison du retard de la remise en état de la route dans le cadre \nde ce projet était due à des irrégularités de procédure dans la gestion du projet. La situation a \nmaintenant été réglée et les autorisations nécessaires ont été obtenues pour procéder aux \ntravaux en cours dans le cadre de ce projet.  \nJe tiens à souligner, Madame la présidente, que plusieurs kilomètres des routes dans \ndifférentes régions de l’île sont en mauvaises état et nécessitent une réfection suite aux \ntravaux de pose des tuyaux effectués par la CWA.  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Kokin tuyo sa! \n\n49 \n \nMr Assirvaden: En plus d’avoir volé des tuyaux, bien sûr.  \nMon ministère examinera les travaux de remise en priorité. Des fonds ont été prévus à \ncet effet dans ce budget, donc la réfection des travaux sera faite. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, just one question. You have one minute! For answer, as well.  \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Minister confirm to this House \nwhether the inaction by the former government contributed to an excessive amount to repair \nsimilar road problems around the island so that the whole population can understand this? \nMr Assirvaden: Oui, l’honorable membre a parfaitement raison, Madame la \nprésidente. Si on recommence à parler du R 700 millions du projet Pipe-Replacement \nProgramme, avec d’autres projets à R 1 milliard qui a dépassé largement le R 1.2 milliards, \nceci dit nos routes n’ont pas pu être réasphaltées justement à cause les fonds ont été dilapidés \npar l’ancien gouvernement. \nAn hon. Member:  Kokin ! \nMr Assirvaden: Enfin, voler pour ne pas dire kokin et cela sera fait dans les semaines \nà venir. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, I have one supplementary.  \nMr Beechook: Madame la présidente, est-ce que l’honorable ministre peut considérer \nla possibilité d’avoir un seul contracteur pour la pose des tuyaux et le réasphaltage parce que \nsouvent, il y a un grand décalage entre le remplacement des tuyaux et le réasphaltage \npuisqu’il y a deux contracteurs qui sont concernés et que ça prend beaucoup de temps et cela \ncause beaucoup d’inconvénients aux automobilistes ? \nMr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, j’apprécie la question de l’honorable membre. \nNous sommes en train de revoir tous ces départements de procurement mais bien sûr, il \nfaudra respecter the Procurement Act.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, everybody. I suspend the Sitting for one and a half \nhour. We will be back at two-thirty.  \nAt 1.01 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.30 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Please be seated!  \n\n50 \n \nHon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nTYPE 1 DIABETES – INSULIN PUMPS & CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITOR",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/559",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 559,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/559) Mr J. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nHealth and Wellness whether, in regard to Type 1 diabetes, he will state the reported number \nof patients thereof living in Agaléga, Rodrigues, and mainland Mauritius, respectively, \nindicating where matters stand as to the proposed distribution thereto of Insulin Pumps and \nContinuous Glucose Monitor, further indicating – \n(a) \nthe number thereof distributed as at date, and \n(b) \nif there is a current shortage thereof and, if so, when same will be available.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that Type 1 diabetes \nmellitus is insulin dependent diabetes where the patients are administered insulin. At present, \n1,114 patients living with Type 1 diabetes are following treatment in our public institution in \nthe Republic of Mauritius, with none in Agaléga, 32 in Rodrigues, and 1,082 in Mauritius. \nI am further informed that insulin pump is a device containing insulin which is attached \nto the body of the patient on a 24-hour basis and tracks the glucose level in real time. Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, the proposal to introduce Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose \nMonitoring Systems was made by the former government in 2023 without proper \nconsultation with the technical staff of my Ministry.  \nWhen our Government took over, we had this measure examined by a group of \ntechnical experts and it was subsequently based on the technical advice that the introduction \nof insulin pumps was found not feasible in the local context due to – \n(a) \nLack of personnel to support insulin pump use and continuous glucose \nmonitoring who will monitor the use by children who are Type 1 diabetics in \nschools; \n(b) \nLack of support to cater for emergencies arising from faulty insulin pump; \n(c) \nHigh cost involved as the insulin pump has several costs associated to it. \nMoreover. an insulin pump has to be replaced on average after four years of use, \nand \n(d) \nInsulin pumps provide a modest reduction in HbA1c blood test, conducted for \nevaluating blood sugar level for the last three months. \nMoreover, Professor D. Owens, the imminent diabetologist from the United Kingdom, \nhas also not recommended the use of those insulin pumps. As such, the insulin pump and \n\n51 \n \ncontinuous glucose monitoring were found to be impracticable in the public health services. \nThus, they are not recommended at this point in time.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed that at present, my Ministry is already \nensuring all services for the required treatment of Type 1 diabetes patients as per international \nstandard, including dedicated specialised Type 1 diabetes clinic in each health region with a \nmulti-disciplinary team of anthropologists, paediatricians, diabetes specialised nurses and \ndieticians. The services offered include – \n(i) \nAccess to insulin supply, and \n(ii) \nPin prick blood glucose monitoring devices. \nDiabetic children aged 0 to 16 years old are managed are by paediatricians. All Type 1 \ndiabetic patients, including children have regular foot care and dental check-up and are \nprovided glucose meters and glucose strips free of charge. Adults are referred to retinal \nscreening unit once yearly. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry has set up seven retinal screening unit all over the \nisland for early detection of retinopathy diabetes and eleven-foot care units for prevention of \namputations. This Government is prioritising the prevention and control of non-\ncommunicable diseases, including diabetes which remains a major public health challenge in \nMauritius.  \nFollowing a policy decision in 1987 under the Labour Party, a dedicated prevention unit \nwas created within the Ministry under the first national NCD survey. This unit now forms \npart of the NCD Health Promotion Research Unit and is actively engaged in a wide range of \nscreening and prevention activities across the island. These include the screening in the \ncommunity and at workplace as well as screening of students of secondary school for Grade \n7, Grade 9 and Grade 12 aged between 13 and 17 for the early detection of NCDs, including \ndiabetes. \nStudents with diabetes are referred to paediatricians in regional hospitals and those with \nprediabetes are referred to nearest mediclinic, area health centre and community health centre \nfor further investigation and treatment. This Government has taken the bold measures, as \nenunciated in the very first budget presented by the hon. Prime Minister, who discouraged the \nhigh consumption of sugar by the population by increasing excise duty on sugar content and \nsugar sweetened products from 6 cents to 12 cents per gram as from 06 June 2025 and the \n\n52 \n \nincrease in excise duty will be extended to chocolates and ice cream as from 01 October \n2025. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you have a supplementary? \nMr François: Just one supplementary. Not being a medical technician, from what the \nhon. Minister said, are there any alternatives for those requiring daily testing at home? \nMr Bachoo: I think that is a bit difficult for the time being because of lack of \npaediatricians. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: I heard the hon. Minister’s answer. With review to the technical report by \nProfessor Owen, who is an eminent endocrinologist and diabetologist, did the team also said \nthat continuous glucose monitoring should not be part of national policy for juvenile diabetes \nType 1? \nMr Bachoo: No, he did not say that. It was in reference to the new system that was \nproposed by the previous government. He did not speak about it. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or! \nMELVILLE, GRAND GAUBE – BUS SERVICE IRREGULARITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025",
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/560",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 560,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/560) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to Melville, Grand Gaube, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information as to \nwhether consideration will be given for the implementation of corrective measures to ensure \nthat public buses plying thereat adhere to the scheduled timings to relieve the public, \nespecially, residents and students facing hardships as a result thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the NLTA that the \nvillage of Melville, Grand Gaube is served by six buses owned by individual bus operators. \nThese buses, which ply along route 178 Melville, Madame Azor via Goodlands, are \nregistered with the Bus Owner’s Corporative Society North. I am further informed that \nrepeated complaints regarding the unsatisfactory level of service resulting from non-\nobservance of established time table were received at the level of the NLTA. \nFurthermore, with the extension of Route 178 to Bois d'Oiseaux, Poudre d'Or since 13 \nJuly 2024, the service has faced significant delays resulting in increased inconvenience to \n\n53 \n \nresidents of Melville and Madame Azor. As I apprised to the House on 17 December 2024, a \nday on which the hon. Member had first questioned me on the same locality, with a view to \nmitigating the low level of public bus transport service along Route 178, while addressing the \ncomplaints received thereto, two temporary RSLs were granted to operators thereat. These \nbuses start plying since February 2023 and December 2024. \nWhile this remedial measure initially led to some improvements and fewer complaints, \nI am made to understand that the service reliability has once again declined. The main reason \nbeing due to aging fleet. According to the NLTA, several buses, particularly those over 14 \nyears of age, are prone to frequent breakdowns, resulting therefore in poor level of service. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to enlighten the House that out of six buses plying \nalong Route 178, two are above 14 years, that is,15 and 17 while the other one has reached 12 \nyears, implying that 50% of the current operational fleet thereat is prone to frequent \nbreakdowns. Furthermore, in light of recent checks undertaken by the NLTA inspectorate, it \nhas been observed that only five buses are in active operation along Route 178 as one bus is \noff-road since September 2024 and has still not been replaced. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in light of this situation, the NLTA has had several meetings \nwith the operators of the corporative society to discuss about the various complaints \nregarding non-compliance with the established timetable. The operators were cautioned by \nthe regulator, that is, the NLTA and they were warned that failure to maintain service levels \nmay result in disciplinary measures. The operator whose bus is not operating since September \n2024 has reassured the NLTA that arrangements are ongoing for the replacement of this bus \nin the next three months. \nFurthermore, the other operators were encouraged to consider the timely renewal of \ntheir buses while availing support from the Bus Modernisation Scheme, which is being voted \nin this budget. Concurrently, enforcement has been stepped up, and fixed penalty notices are \nbeing issued to drivers for timetable breaches.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish however to highlight to the House that the NLTA \nreported that redeployment of buses from other routes to Route 178, which were being \ncontemplated, remains challenging, and is, in fact, not advisable since the route thereat \ncannot accommodate larger buses because the roads are small.  The specificity of the road is \nsuitable for only 30-to-40-seater buses.  \n\n54 \n \nConsequently, the NLTA is exploring the possibility of licensing one additional bus on \nRoute 178 with the aim of reinforcing operation, improving frequency and easing the \ndifficulties faced by residents and students at Melville and Grand Gaube.  \nAs a last note, I will follow with the NLTA to ensure that a sustainable solution at the \nearliest be found. I am confident that with the introduction of a fleet management system, \nthings will improve going forward. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Supplementary! \nMr Beejan: Can the hon. Minister inform the House if surprise visits at regular \nintervals by officers of the NLTA can be carried out to ensure that they adhere to the \nscheduled time for the buses? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Since about two weeks now, there is a new management at the \nNLTA. I had meetings with them with a view to taking onboard the propositions made by the \nhon. Member. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle! \nBASIC RETIREMENT PENSION – FUNDS BUDGETED (2014-2024)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025",
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/561",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 561,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/561) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \nwhether, in regard to the Elderly Population, he will state the number thereof being paid \nBasic Retirement Pension and other allowance by age group, indicating the – \n(a) total amount of funds budgeted therefor for each of the financial years since \n2014 to 2024, and \n(b) projections of changes therein in the next ten years.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nCUREPIPE TOWN HALL – RENOVATION WORKS – COSTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/562",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 562,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/562) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the renovation works carried \nout at the Town Hall of Curepipe in 2015, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \nthe Municipal Council of Curepipe, information as to the initial estimated costs thereof and \nof consultancy services therefor and the final costs thereof on completion. \n\n55",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Municipal Council of \nCurepipe that in 2015, it undertook 15 renovation works as follows – \n(i) \nRenovation for the fencing of the basketball/volleyball pitch and lighting at \nAtlee; \n(ii) \nLighting at Les Casernes Football Ground; \n(iii) Upgrading of fencing works at the football ground at Sir Winston Churchill \nStadium; \n(iv) Levelling and turfing of l'Oiseau Football Ground; \n(v) \nLevelling and turfing of the Casernes Football Ground Development Project \n2024; \n(vi) Maintenance of building at the cemetery; \n(vii) Construction of temporary metal structure for fairs at Le Forum Market Fair; \n(viii) Extension of existing metal structure for temporary fair at Le Forum Market \nFair; \n(ix) Fencing of the volleyball pitch at L’Oiseau; \n(x) \nLighting works at volleyball pitch at L’Oiseau, phase 1; \n(xi) Lighting works at L’Oiseau, phase 2; \n(xii) Turfing of the existing football ground at Laperouse, Street Curepipe; \n(xiii) Lighting works at Les Caserne Football Ground; \n(xiv) Extension of existing metal structure for Forum fair, and \n(xv) Construction of spiral metal staircase at Curepipe Market. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am advised that no consultancy services were retained for \nthese projects. I am tabling the details with cost estimate and final contract value as requested \nin the first question. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Minister, the question was about the Town hall of \nCurepipe. \nMr Woochit: However, I am informed that in March 2014, the Municipal Council of \nCurepipe took a decision to restore and repair the Town Hall of Curepipe and in October \n2015, it proceeded with a request for proposal to appoint a consultant for the restoration and \nrepairs of the Town Hall. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Town Hall of Curepipe was closed since 2013. In March \n2014, the Council took a decision to restore and renovate the Town Hall based on a \ncollaboration between the Municipal Council of Curepipe and the SPLIT LTD, consultant of \n\n56 \n \nSOS patrimoine. The latter has estimated the cost for restoration and repairs of the town hall \nat Rs38 million.  \nIt is worth noting that the material constituting the Town Hall of Curepipe are mainly \nmade of wood. Hence, in the extremely humid climate of Curepipe, this material is bound to \nbe affected and prone to decay.  \nMore than a year and a half had elapsed, and by then, the Town Hall had fallen into \nmore despair. \nThe approval of the then project and plan committee was obtained in September 2014. \nThe Municipal Council of Curepipe then proceeded with a request for proposal in October \n2015 to appoint a consultant still on the same estimate of Rs38 million and with the closing \ndate on 09 November 2015.  \nThe Bid Evaluation Committee recommended that the contract for consultancy be \nawarded to Desai & Associates Ltd for an amount of Rs1,840,000 exclusive of VAT. \nThe contract was awarded and the consultancy contract agreement was signed on 08 \nJuly 2016. Desai & Associates Ltd was selected on the basis of having achieved the highest \ncombined technical and financial scores. The consultancy service was for a duration of 30 \nmonths.  \nHowever, the total costs of the repairs and refurbishment were assessed by the \nconsultant Desai & Associates Ltd in 2016 at Rs134million that is, Rs134,987,000 inclusive \nof VAT that is, before proceeding with the invitation of bids for renovation works. \nThe increase in cost estimate was due to inclusion of the items such as replacement of \nmajority of internal timber claddings, strengthening works to timber floor structure, \nrefurbishment of kitchen, luminaires and other accessories including revised estimate for \nreplacement of roof structure given that there was further deterioration in the structure. A \ncomparative exercise was effected by the Council regarding the updated cost. \nThe Council had highlighted that that the Town Hall is experiencing a continuous \ndeterioration with time and had sought the approval of the project plan committee regarding \nthe increase in the cost of the project scheme as per the investment project process manual. \nAny project which cost estimate is exceeded, the approved cost estimate by 15% at project \ndesigned phase, had to obtain the clearance of the aforesaid mentioned committee. By then, \n\n57 \n \nthe project involved in the renovation of the Town Hall of Curepipe instead of just restoration \nand repairs. \nOn 08 February 2017, the project plan committee had requested the Ministry to ask the \nMunicipal Council to seek a second opinion on the estimate cost proposed by the consultant \nand to try to revise same downwards. The Municipal Council of Curepipe requested that \nkempas could be used as an alternative material for the roof swingle instead of teak swingle \nwhich would cause a significant decrease of around Rs16million. The use of alternate \nmaterials at the basement level was also recommended following which the cost was revised \nto Rs117,380,000 exclusive of VAT. \nOn 06 April 2018, the Municipal Council of Curepipe informed that the cost estimate \nhad been revised from Rs117,380,000 (exclusive of VAT) to Rs126,198,000 (exclusive of \nVAT), that is, Rs145,127,700 (VAT inclusive).  \nThe then head of the Public Infrastructure Department of the Council informed on 09 \nApril 2018 that the increase in cost is due to further deterioration of the public infrastructure \nresulting from heavy rainfall during the period of 2017-2018. \nOn 17 April 2018, the then Ministry of Local Government and Outer Islands conveyed \nits approval for increase in project value for the renovation of the Town Hall building of \nCurepipe from Rs117,380,000 (exclusive of VAT) to Rs126,198,000 (exclusive of VAT), \nthat is, Rs145,127,700 (VAT inclusive).  \nConsequently, the consultant submitted the 06 August 2018, a revised consultancy fees \nRs6, 615, 000, excluding VAT based on the new estimate costs and increase in the scope of \nworks. \nA bid evaluation committee was set up at the level of the Council to assess the revised \nconsultancy fee. That committee recommended that an amount of Rs6,033,000 be paid to the \nconsultant. The approval of the then Ministry of Local Government and Outer Islands were \nsought following which, the advice for the Procurement Policy Office was requested \nfollowing which, a meeting was held at the level of Procurement Policy Office on 10 January \n2019 where it was noted that is the Municipal Council of Curepipe had interpreted section \n46(4) of the Public Procurement Act 2006 to justify the increase in  consultancy fees with no \nlimit when it should have referred the section 46(3) of the Public Procurement Act 2006 \nwhich caps the amount. The Council was thus requested to reassess the revised fees. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, a new bid evaluation committee was set up. \n\n58 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Minister, sorry you are going too long. Let us be simple, \nthat to the initial costs and your consultancy fees and the final cost. \nMr Woochit: Yeah, the final, it is coming to a final. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Just please inform us about these three items. \nMr Woochit: Yeah, the consultant was not agreeable to these revised fees and went for \narbitration given that the Municipal Council of Curepipe could not go against the provision of \nthe Public Procurement Act 2006 and the Public Procurement Regulations 2008. Following \nthe arbitration, an award of Rs13 million was made to Desai & Associates including \nconsultation fees, arbitration costs, legal fees and interests. \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Okay. Hon. Second Member for Rodrigues. \n13TH CJSOI GAMES – PARTICIPATING COUNTRIES – YOUTH \nDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/563",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 563,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/563) Mr J. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nYouth and Sports whether, in regard to the 13th CJSOI GAMES to be held in Seychelles \nfrom 28 July to 10 August 2025, he will state – \n(a) the number of – \n(i) \nsports disciplines that feature therein; \n(ii) \nparticipating countries, and \n(iii) participants for the Mauritian delegation, including from Rodrigues, \nindicating the facilities being provided to the pre-selected and/or selected \nathletes and coaches in preparation thereof, and \n(b) if youth development initiatives such as entrepreneurship and cultural exchange \nwill be encouraged in the course thereof and, if so, give details of same.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, le 13eme édition des Jeux de la Commission \nde la Jeunesse et des Sports de l’Océan Indien will be held on the 2nd to 10th August 2025 in \nSeychelles. Since its inception, our country has always participated in the CJSOI Games. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (a)(i) of the question, I am informed that this \nyear’s edition will feature eleven sport disciplines and a concours culturel. The sport \ndisciplines are – \n• \nathletics; \n• \npara-athletics; \n\n59 \n \n• \nbadminton; \n• \nbasketball; \n• \nbeach soccer; \n• \nboxing; \n• \nfootball; \n• \njudo; \n• \nswimming; \n• \nvolleyball; \n• \nweightlifting, and \n• \nyachting. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a)(ii) of the question, I am informed that \nthe seven member countries have confirmed their participation, namely – \n• \nComoros; \n• \nDjibouti; \n• \nMadagascar; \n• \nMauritius; \n• \nMayotte; \n• \nReunion Island, and \n• \nSeychelles. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, concerning part (a)(iii) of the question, I am informed that 165 \nparticipants, including 27 from Rodrigues, will represent the Republic of Mauritius. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in order to ensure an optimal preparation for the games, my \nMinistry is providing the following facilities and support – \n(i) \nAccess to the high-performance centre at Côte d’Or National Sport Complex for \nphysical preparation; \n(ii) \nParticipation in local and regional competitions; \n(iii) \nA light meal after training sessions; \n(iv) \nSport facilities; \n(v) \nIntensive training; \n(vi) \nCamps tailored to each sport; \n(vii) \nProvision of specific equipment, and \n\n60 \n \n(viii) Medical and paramedical facilities such as massage, vitamins and supplements, \nblood tests and dental care. \nA comité de suivi chaired by the Director of Sports of my Ministry has been set up to \nensure the effective implementation of these measures. Accordingly, officers of my Ministry \nconduct regular site visits and hold regular meetings with the National Sports Federation. \nThese allow for close monitoring and timely feedback on the ongoing preparation. \nFurther, I am informed by the Commission for Youth and Sports in Rodrigues that \nathletes are provided with transport facilities for training purposes in Rodrigues. The \nCommission also met the travel costs for the athletes who came to Mauritius to participate in \nqualifying rounds in the case of athletics, boxing and volleyball. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard to part (b) of the question, as I have already \nindicated, the CJSOI games also feature – \n• \na concours culturel which includes an assemblée des jeunes where our youth, one \nboy and one girl, will intervene on this year’s theme which is Les enjeux \nclimatiques et l’écoresponsabilité des jeunes; \n• \nan exchanged cultural dance and theatre where there are Mauritian boys and girls \nwho will present a dance item specific to our country; \n• \na salon des jeunes entrepreneurs where two Mauritians, one male and one female, \nwill have an opportunity to showcase their entrepreneurship talent; \n• \ne-sports where one boy and one girl will get to compete in a videogame against \nparticipants from other countries, and \n• \na forum de la jeunesse where all young people from the seven countries of the \nCJSOI and who are partaking in the concours culturel can participate. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am confident that with these facilities and support, our \nathletes will surely make our country proud and bring a maximum of medals. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Do you have a supplementary? \nMr François: Yes, please. I think I have just missed some of the numbers. May I ask \nthe hon. Minister whether, there will be parity in the national delegation for coaches, \nencadreurs and the youth participants from Rodrigues for the initiative of concours culturel, \nsalon des jeunes as you mentioned for this game? \n\n61 \n \nMr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House and my hon. \ncolleague from Rodrigues in particular, that I have ensured that our youth from Rodrigues are \nadequately represented in the games. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, six young Rodriguans are participating in the concours \nculturel in parity with their counterparts from mainland Mauritius. This arrangement also \napplies to the encadreurs. In the last edition of the CJSOI games in 2022 in Mauritius, two \nyoung from Rodrigues had participated therein. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to point out that the Commission for Youth and Sports \nin Rodrigues was entrusted with the responsibility of selecting the Rodriguan participants in \nrespect of the concours culturel. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka! \nVETERINARY SERVICES – EFFICIENCY & CORRECTIVE MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/564",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 564,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/564) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the veterinary support provided to local breeders and farmers by the Livestock and \nVeterinary Division of his Ministry, including its ambulatory veterinary unit, he will state if \nconsideration will be given for the carrying out of an assessment thereof and taking of \ncorrective measures, if required, to ensure the efficacy and efficiency thereof.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, hon. Member. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard \nto assessment of the Division of Veterinary Services, formally known as Livestock and \nVeterinary Division, I wish to inform the House that an assessment was conducted by the \nWorld Organisation for Animal Health from 29 April to 10 May 2024, and a final report is \nstill awaited. However, a draft report has been submitted to my Ministry.  \nSome of the key recommendations made by the World Organisation for Animal Health \nare as follows – \n(i) \nDevelop dedicated livestock animal health policy and strategy which includes \nveterinary public health adopting one health approach; \n(ii) \nDevelop formal guidelines for accurate documentation of inspection functions \nand to strengthen capacity to allow Division of the Veterinary Services to perform \nits core function more effectively and in line with the World Organisation for \nAnimal Health Standards; \n\n62 \n \n(iii) Develop a Code of Ethics and rules of practice and prepare work ethics guidelines \nto ensure the quality of veterinary service provision and review and revise all \nlegislation covering the veterinary domain to comply with the World Organisation \nfor Animal Health (WOAH) Terrestrial Animal Health Code. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, a debriefing session was held at the level of my Ministry to \ndiscuss the key recommendations of the World Organisation for Animal Health and an action \nplan is being formulated by the Division of Veterinary Services to guide implementation.  \nI am informed that over the past ten years, livestock breeders have consistently raised \nconcern about quality of service and have been calling for improved veterinary support from \nthe Division of Veterinary Services. In the light of concerns raised by livestock breeders, my \nMinistry is taking the following measures to enhance the efficacy and efficiency of vet \nservices – \n(a) \nIncreasing the number of mobile veterinary clinics from one to three; \n(b) \nRecruitment of veterinary officers, and \n(c) \nImprove drug supply. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry remains fully committed to strengthening \nveterinary service delivery through concrete and targeted action. The measures which have \nbeen mentioned aim at addressing the concern of breeders and ensure a more responsive, \nefficient and effective veterinary service nationwide. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. The hon. Third Member for Montagne Blanche and \nGrand River South East! \nFLACQ HOSPITAL – SPECIALTY SERVICES – OPERATIONALISATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/565",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 565,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Dr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/565) Dr. R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the newly announced \nimplementation of Specialty Services in Ophthalmology, Cardiology and Neurosurgery, he \nwill state if same will be implemented at the Flacq Hospital and, if so, indicate the expected \ndate of coming into operation thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in regard to the newly announced implementation \nof Speciality Services in Ophthalmology, Cardiology and Neurosurgery, I wish to inform the \nHouse that several measures are being taken by my Ministry to strengthen the healthcare \nservices at the new Flacq Hospital. Ophthalmology and Cardiology services are being \nenhanced and made more accessible to the population in the eastern region. Insofar as \n\n63 \n \nneurosurgery is concerned, a new neurosurgery outpatient department has been operational in \nthe new Flacq Hospital. \nSince January 2025, an Ophthalmology Unit has been set up at the new Flacq Hospital. \nCataract surgeries are being conducted on a daily basis and ophthalmology outpatient \nconsultation is held every Monday at the hospital. In addition, retinal screening is also \nconducted at Lady Sushil Ramgoolam Mediclinic, which falls under the purview of the new \nFlacq Hospital. This decentralisation of ophthalmology services has improved access to eye \ncare and also significantly reduced waiting time for surgical procedures. \n It is to be noted that ophthalmology services are already being offered at Moka Eye \nHospital and Souillac Hospital, contributing to a broader and more efficient regional network. \nThe establishment of Ophthalmology Unit at the Flacq Hospital has further bolstered these \nservices and deliver much needed care to residents of the eastern and northern regions. \nIn line with our commitment to continually enhance specialised care, my Ministry is \npresently working on the establishment of a state-of-the-art Coronary Angiography Unit at \nthe new Flacq Hospital. Once operational, this unit will allow for the performance of \ndiagnostic angiography and interventional procedures such as angioplasty, thus providing \ncritical life-saving services locally and reducing the need for patient transfers to other major \nhospitals.  \nAs far as Neurosurgery is concerned, my Ministry is actively engaged in the setting up \nof a specialised Neuroscience Chroma and Rehabilitation Centre by early 2026. This \ninitiative forms part of the broader strategy to decentralise tertiary care and to improve access \nto advanced neurosurgical services in the region. The unit will be equipped to handle \nneurosurgical cases and will include a dedicated Neuro Out-Patient Department for \nconsultations, follow-up and non-invasive assessments. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the implementation of these speciality services, coupled with a \ncomprehensive ENT Unit, at the new Flacq Hospital, reflects this Government’s unwavering \ncommitment to equitable, decentralised and high-quality healthcare delivery, which has the \nobjective of providing timely and accessible care for all our citizens. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes! \n\n64 \n \nMETRO EXPRESS LTD – TICKET VENDING MACHINES – ROBBERY CASES – \nCORRECTIVE SECURITY MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/566",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 566,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/566) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the recent cases of robbery at the \nTicket Vending Machines located at the Trianon and Belle Rose Light Rail Stations, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from Metro Express Ltd., information as to the – \n(a) \ncircumstances thereof and quantum of money robbed in each case;  \n(b) \nsecurity measures in place at the time, and  \n(c) \ncorrective security measures being taken thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, \nI am informed by Metro Express Ltd. that, since I took office in November last, a total of five \nincidents have been reported at various metro stations, including those of Trianon and Belle \nRose, in the constituency of the hon. Member.  \nThe total loss suffered by MEL amounts to Rs5.2 million, that is, Rs102,170 as stolen \nmoney and Rs5.1 million, I am informed, as damages to assets. I am tabling the reports from \nMEL with regard to these incidents.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, regarding part (b) of the question, in so far as security \nmeasures are concerned, I am informed that security services are provided to all Metro \nExpress Ltd. premises, including the light rail corridor station and ticket vending machines - \nwhich is part of your question - and this is done in toto by a company called Edmond Security \nServices Ltd, in short, ESSL.  \nThe contract for this company has been renewed on several occasions since - I am \nfurther informed - the beginning of the project. On 29 May 2024, the contract was awarded \nfor two years for an annual amount Rs23,339,940. \nAs per the contract, security deployment for night duty operations for ensuring security \ncomprises the following – \n• two security guards posted at Richelieu Depot gatepost; \n• one security guard assigned to the CCTV Monitoring Room located at Richelieu \nDepot; \n\n65 \n \n• four patrol vehicles, each with two security guards, deployed to cover \ndesignated stretches of the main line network, and  \n• two security guards conducting foot patrolling along vulnerable sections of the \ncorridor. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (c) of the question, I am informed that \nfollowing the incidents, MEL took a series of immediate actions as follows – \n(i) \nCash collection by MEL at all stations daily so as to limit the overnight amount \nof cash in the ticket vending machines. \n(ii) \nOn 19 May, an ambush operation was organised by MEL, supported by the \nPolice, which led to the arrest of one of the two perpetrators. \n(iii) \nA meeting was held on 23 May 2025 with the Divisional Commander of the \nWestern Division of the Police and MEL, which confirmed that actions were \nunderway to locate and apprehend the second suspect involved in the 19 May \n2025 incident, who still remains at large so far. \n(iv) \nCCTV footages for all incidents have been handed over to CID, SOCO and FIU \nto facilitate ongoing investigations. \n(v) \nIn parallel, MEL reinforced its internal surveillance with response to protocol \nthrough its Operational Control Centre. \n(vi) \nThe Police has been requested to reinforce security along the metro corridor. \nAs a last note, I am further informed that in a special board meeting held last week, the \nBoard took cognizance of the whole matter. I am further informed that the termination of the \ncontract will be on the agenda of the forthcoming board meeting which is scheduled on 21 \nJune 2025. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, M. le président. Will the hon. Minister inform the \nHouse whether the company involved is the same one that was at the centre of the Moustass \nLeaks scandal prior to the last general election? Thank you. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes, indeed, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my attention has been \ndrawn to these two videos, allegedly, mentioning that company in particular, and one, again \nallegedly, during the very sensitive period which is the tender process.  \n\n66 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Another one? \nMs Anquetil: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. In the light of the above, will the \nhon. Minister consider referring the matter to the FCC? Thank you. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this is in the remit of the Board of \nMetro Express Ltd. I can certainly convey this, specially, the more so there is a board \nmeeting forthcoming, that this be taken on the agenda as well. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or! \nSTC – SUPPLY OF WHITE OIL – CONTRACT DETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/567",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 567,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/567) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the supply of white \noil, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the State Trading Corporation, \ninformation as to the name of the present supplier thereof, indicating the – \n(a) \ncontract period, and  \n(b) \ncontract amount thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Yeung Sik Yuen: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that the State Trading \nCorporation had launched an Open International Bid for the current supply of white oil, on \nthe Government e-Procurement Portal on 16 April 2024, namely Mogas, Gas oil, Jet A-1 and \nMarine Gas Oil.  \nSeven bids have been received and further to an evaluation exercise by the STC, the \ncontract for the supply of white oil was awarded to Sahara Energy Resources Ltd., the \nsubstantially lowest, technically responsive bidder with respect to the premium which \ncomprises the supplies margin, freight costs, insurance and other ancillary costs at loading \nand unloading ports, including port charges, deviation, bunkers, tank cleaning and \npreparation and security team fees if necessary and contamination risks. \nThe total price paid by the STC for each consignment is the premium plus the reference \nflat price for the product which varies daily. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with respect to part (a) of the question, I am informed that the \nduration of the contract is for the period 01 August 2024 to 31 July 2025. \n\n67 \n \nWith respect to part (b) of the question, the annual contract for the premium was \nestimated at USD 57.17 million, equivalent to Rs2.66 billion, and the total contract amount \nwas estimated at USD 598.91 million, equivalent to Rs27.87 billion, which comprise the \nreference flat price plus the premium. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you have a supplementary question? \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Can the hon. Minister confirm \nwhether the STC has launched a new tender exercise recently? \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that on 11 April 2025, \nthe STC launched an Open International Bidding exercise for the supply of white oil for the \nperiod of 01 August 2025 to 31 July 2026. At the opening of bids on 16 May 2025, 14 bids \nwere received. I understand that the new contract is costing around Rs1 billion less than the \npresent contract. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Last one! \nMr Beejan: Can the hon. Minister inform the House what is the premium price and the \ntotal contract amount of the new contract starting from 01 August 2025 till 31 July 2026 and \nalso of the situation of the Price Stabilisation Account? Thank you. \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Concerning the Price Stabilisation Account, I am informed that as \nat 17 June 2025, the PSA, which is normally used to stabilise the retail prices of Mogas and \nGasoil, currently has a deficit of Rs2.8 billion for Gasoil while there is a slightly positive \nbalance of Rs400 m. for Mogas. We must also understand that there was a time where the \ndeficit was around Rs5.2 billion when the previous government was in power. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet! \nSICOM – GROUP PENSIONS DEPARTMENT – RECRUITMENT & \nFINANCIAL OVERVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/568",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 568,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/568) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the Group \nPensions Department of the State Insurance Company of Mauritius Ltd., she will, for the \nbenefit of the House, for the year 2024, obtain information as to the – \n(a)  number of officers recruited thereat, grade-wise, and  \n\n68 \n \n(b)  annual revenue and expenditure thereof.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ms Jeetun: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the State Insurance \nCompany Ltd. (SICOM) that with regard to part (a) of the question, four officers at clerical \nlevel were recruited in the year 2024 to replace three officers who had retired and one who \nhad resigned.   \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that the SICOM administers \nthree-pool pension funds under different legislations – \n1. \nThe Statutory Bodies Pension Funds set up under the Statutory Bodies Pension \nFunds Act and relevant regulations; \n2. \nThe SICOM Pool Private Pension Fund set up under the Private Pension Schemes \nAct, and \n3. \nThe Public Sector Defined Contribution Pension Fund (Public DC) set up under \nthe Statutory Bodies Pension Funds Act and the Pensions Act. \nThe revenue of the three pension funds amounted to Rs8.6 billion for the year 30 June 2024 \nand the expenditure amounted to Rs5.2 billion. \nThe Deputy Speaker:  The hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes! \nDUTY-FREE FACILITY – RELIGIOUS BODIES – APPLICATION & \nOVERSIGHT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/569",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 569,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/569) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the provision of duty-free \nfacilities to priests, religious federations and religious associations for the purchase of motor \nvehicles, he will state, since 01 October 2024 to date, the –  \n(a)  number of – \n(i)  \napplications received for the issue of Duty-Free Certificates, and  \n(ii)  beneficiaries thereof, and  \n(b) composition of the committee responsible for assessing such applications.",
      "answer": "Mr Gondeea: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to the provision of duty-free \nfacilities for the purchase of motor vehicles by priests, religious federations and religious \nassociations, I wish to inform the House that this measure was announced in the Budget \n\n69 \n \nSpeech 2024-2025 by the previous government. The measure was intended to provide duty-\nfree facilities for the purchase of motor cars every seven years to those eligible.  \nThe eligibility criteria are as follows – \n1. \na priest registered with or employed by a religious federation receiving a \ngovernment subsidy; \n2. \na priest registered with or employed by a religious association; \n3. \na priest registered with the Ministry of Arts and Culture, or \n4. \na religious federation employing priest and receiving a government subsidy. \nThis measure is supported by amendments to the Excise Act via the Finance (Miscellaneous \nProvisions) Act 2024 and the Excise (Amendment of Schedule) (No. 4) Regulations 2024 \nwith effect from 01 October 2024. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, while my Ministry was designated to implement this measure \nin collaboration with the Mauritius Revenue Authority, it is crucial to place this decision in its \nproper political and economic context. \nThe timing of this measure raises serious questions. It was promulgated on 01 October \n2024, just three days before the issue of the writ of election on 04 October 2024, and barely \nfive weeks before the general elections on 10 November 2024. It is evident that this scheme \nwas rushed through at the eleventh-hour by the outgoing government in a clear attempt to \nsecure political favour and votes from specific segments of the population. This last-minute \nmeasure was introduced without any proper consultation, impact assessment and \nconsideration of its fiscal implications at a time when the economic fundamentals were \nalready under strain. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a)(i) of the question, I am informed that as \nat date, 38 applications have been received, out of which, only 31 applicants have submitted \nall the required documentations. \nWith regard to part (a)(ii), no beneficiary has yet been granted the facility. This is \nmainly due to delays by applicants in submitting the complete set of required documents. In \nfact, seven applicants have still not done so. Moreover, by the time most documents were \nreceived, we were on the eve of the Budget 2025-2026. \nIn light of the major reforms introduced in the Budget Speech 2025-2026, particularly \nwith regard to vehicle taxation, traffic congestion and our foreign currency reserve, my \n\n70 \n \nMinistry has been advised by the Ministry of Finance to seek a policy decision before any \nfurther action is taken. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that a \ntechnical committee has been constituted at the level of my Ministry to evaluate all \napplications and make recommendations for approval or non-approval. The committee is \nchaired by the Director of Culture and includes representatives from the Prime Minister’s \nOffice, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Local Government, the Registry of \nAssociation and the Mauritius Revenue Authority. \nI am further informed that only one meeting has been held so far on 23 January 2025 \nduring which it was found that the majority of applications were incomplete and lack key \ndocuments. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this Government remains firmly committed to promoting \nreligious and socio-cultural harmony, but we will do so with fiscal discipline, equity and \ntransparency. We believe public funds must be managed responsibly and fairly. The previous \ngovernment’s approach of introducing last minute electoral incentive without due process is \nnot in keeping with good governance. As such, the scheme is currently under consideration \nand a final decision will be taken shortly. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you have one supplementary? \nMs Anquetil: Two supplementary, please, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir!  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Let us proceed one by one. \nMs Anquetil: Yes, one by one. A delay of seven months is considerable, especially \nwhen it concerns priests, religious federations and associations. Would the hon. Minister \ninform the House the reason behind such a delay? Thank you. \nMr Gondeea: I think I just explained the delay. It was because of the documents which \nhave not been given to the Ministry. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Last one! \nMs Anquetil: Last one. Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Would the hon. Minister \ninform the House when the duty-free licences be expected to be issued? Thank you. \n\n71 \n \nMr Gondeea: Again, I already replied. I said that it is under consideration and a final \ndecision will be taken shortly. \nThe Deputy Speaker: One question from you! \nMr Beechook: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I was following the reply of the Minister. Is it \nan established practice to have religious workers registered at the level of the Ministry of Arts \nand Culture? \nMr Gondeea: I do not think so. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay! Can we proceed with the next question? \nThe hon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet! \nSICOM – GROUP PENSIONS (TECHNICAL) MANAGER – QUALIFICATIONS & \nRECRUITMENT PROCESS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/570",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 570,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/570) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the current \nManager - Group Pensions (Technical) of the State Insurance Company of Mauritius Ltd., she \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the – \n(a)  academic and professional qualifications thereof, indicating the number of \npromotions and responsibility allowances granted thereto over the period 2014 to \n2024, and  \n(b)  recruitment process followed for the recruitment thereof, including the \nadvertisement date for the position and requirements thereof.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ms Jeetun: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the State Insurance \nCompany Ltd., with regard to part (a) of the question, that the incumbent holds a School \nCertificate, a Higher School Certificate and is a Fellow Member of the Institute and Faculty \nof Actuaries of the UK. \nI am also informed by the SICOM that the officer was a Senior Actuarial Analyst since \nMarch 2008. In February 2018, the officer was promoted as Deputy Manager of Risk \nDepartment. In February 2020, the incumbent was laterally transferred to the Group Pensions \nDepartment. Then, in March 2021, with the impending retirement of the Senior Executive \nOfficer Group Pensions, the Group Pensions Department was restructured and the incumbent \n\n72 \n \nwas called upon to shoulder additional responsibilities. The incumbent was granted a monthly \nresponsibility allowance with the normal conditions of service. \nI am also informed by the SICOM that following the retirement of the Senior Executive \nOfficer Group Pensions in August 2021, the officer was appointed to the position of Manager \nGroup Pensions on 21 September 2021.  \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that in light of the foregoing, the \npost Manager Group Pensions Technical was not advertised internally or externally. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as mentioned earlier, I was informed that a restructuring had \nbeen undertaken in the department but given that there seems to be more questions than \nanswers, I am going to ask the board to undertake an independent investigation regarding this \nrestructuring on the promotion of this officer.   \nThank you.  \nMr Rookny: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to ask the hon. Minister if it is a \nnormal practice in the Financial Services regulated company and the more so, in a state-\nowned company, if it is a normal practice for promotions to be given without advertisement, \ninternally or externally? \nDr. Ms Jeetun: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in normal circumstances, there should have \nbeen a process. As I said, I’ve got more questions than answers and so, I will ask the board to \nundertake an independent review and investigation of the matter.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne \nLongue. Our last question for today.  \nLOCAL AUTHORITIES - FINANCIAL CONTROLLER - VACANCIES & \nRECRUITMENT EXERCISE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/571",
      "sitting_id": "17-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-17",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 571,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/571) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the posts of Financial \nController in the local authorities, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain the – \n(a) \nlists of appointees since December 2014 to date, and  \n(b) \nnumber of existing vacancies in each local authority. \n\n73",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard to part (a) of the question, seven \nappointments have been made in the grade of Financial Controller since December 2014 to \ndate.  I am tabling the list.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you.  \nMr Woochit: As to part (b) of the question, there is only one permanent funded \nvacancy in the grade of Financial Controller or at the Municipal Town Council of Beau-\nBassin/Rose-Hill following the retirement of Mr James Daniel Lam Hing on 11 October \n2024.  \nI am informed that the vacancy for the post of Financial Controller has been advertised \non 15 May 2025, among serving qualified officers, Principal Accountant in the service, with \nclosing date set at 28 May 2025. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, we have exhausted all the questions.  \nNext item. Hon. Prime Minister!  \nMOTION  \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I beg to move that all the business on \ntoday’s Order Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10.  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded.  \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nSTATEMENT BY MINISTER \nBUDGET SPEECH 2025-2026 – PENSION REFORMS \n(3.28 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with your permission, I am making a \nStatement to the House.  \nIn the Budget Speech, we have announced a major reform to the Basic Retirement \nPension. It is abundantly clear that the old age pension system in Mauritius has become \nfiscally unsustainable and financially unbearable by the reckless policies of the previous \ngovernment. \n\n74 \n \n2. \nIn our country, the present working generation shoulders the responsibility of funding \nthe BRP expenses for the elderly generation. When present workers retire, it will be their turn \nto benefit from pensions and the future working generation will fund it. \n3. \nWhen the number of workers is much higher than the number of older retirees, the \nsystem is relatively sustainable. But when the number of workers shrinks and the number of \nold age pensioners soars, the system becomes financially unsustainable and financially \nunbearable.  \n4. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is extremely rare for a country to provide old age pension \nto – \n(i) \nall persons who are 60 years old; \n(ii) \nthose who have not contributed for their old age pension, as the BRP is a non-\ncontributory pension, and \n(iii) \neverybody who attains the age of 60 irrespective of his income and assets. \n5. \nMauritius, it seems, is the only case where we do this.  \n6. \nEven in rich and advanced countries, the old age pension is paid much later than 60 \nyears (often at 65 years). In France, just now, they are proposing to increase the age to 67 \nyears. In Germany, they are proposing to increase it to 70 years. It is sometimes contributory \nand is mostly means tested.  \n7. \nPrecisely to ensure its fiscal sustainability and its fairness and equity across \ngenerations. \n8. \nAs a result of these three combined features in our old age pension, the BRP has \nbecome fiscally unsustainable and, as I said, financially unbearable.    \n9. \nThe following facts and figures demonstrate beyond any reasonable doubt the fiscal \nunsustainability of the BRP. \n10. \nFirst, the share of BRP in GDP has increased from 1.9 percent in 2010 to 3 percent in \n2015-2016 to 6.1 percent in 2020-2021. And it currently stands at 7.8 percent of GDP.  \n11. \nWithout reform, its share of GDP will continue to rise.   \n12. \nSecond, the proportion of BRP in government recurrent expenditure has escalated \nfrom 9.6 percent in 2010 to 14.2 percent in 2015-2016. It then rose to 20.1 percent in 2020-\n2021, and has reached 24.5 percent in 2024-2025.  \n\n75 \n \n13. \nAgain, without reform, it will continue to absorb a higher share of the recurrent \nexpenditure. \n14. \nThird, BRP as a percentage of government recurrent revenue has surged from 9.7 \npercent in 2010 to 15.2 percent in 2015-2016. It reached 21.4 percent in 2020-2021, and rose \nto a further 30.6 percent by 2024-2025.  \n15. \nAgain, without reform, its share of recurrent revenue will inexorably increase. \n16. \nFourth, in absolute terms, the BRP has increased from Rs5.97 billion in 2010 to \nRs13.1 billion in 2015-2016, then to Rs27.9 billion in 2020-2021, and further to Rs55.4 \nbillion in 2024-2025. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in 14 years, between 2010 and 2024-2025, \nspending on pension has ballooned by staggering 828%. In only four years, between 2021-\n2024/25, it has almost doubled, from Rs27.9 billion to Rs55.4 billion. Likely, it will reach \nRs100 billion in 2035. Now, how can anybody say this is sustainable?  \n17. \nWithout reform, the expenditure on BRP will sharply rise. \n18. \nFifth, the population aged 60 and over has grown substantially from 186,400 in 2015 \nto 250,600 in 2024. \n19. \nIt will continue to grow as the population ages and will reach around 315,000 in 2038. \nEqually, the ratio of older persons will rise considerably with the ageing population from \naround 20% today to 30% in 2051. \n20. \nWithout reform, our pension system will run out of money if the current demographic \ntrajectory persists. \n21. \nSixth, the fertility rate has dropped sharply over the years. From 5.9 in 1960 to 2.8 in \n1980 to 1.57 in 2010, and 1.34 in 2024. \n22. \nIt is now well below the replacement rate of 2.1. This indicates a declining population \nand this trend will accelerate in the future. \n23. \nWithout reform, there will be far fewer workers to support far more pensioners. \n24. \nSeventh, the number of workers will continue to decline while the dependency ratio \nwill rise, thus decreasing the ratio of working individuals to pensioners. The ratio of workers \nto pensioners has declined from 3.9% in 2015 to 2.7% now, and is expected to further fall to \n2% in 2025. \n\n76 \n \n25. \nWithout reform, the smaller working population will have to bear a growing burden of \ncontributions to finance the pensions of the many more retired.  \n26. \nEighth, life expectancy at 60 years has increased for both men and women. \n27. \nLife expectancy of men at 60 has risen from 13.4 in 1962 to almost 17.92 in 2022. For \nwomen, it has gone up from 16.3 years in 1962 to 21.75 in 2022. It means that Government \nhas to fund non-contributory pension for a much longer period for both men and women. \n28. \nWithout reform, it will be very challenging to fund pension for more people with \nhigher number of pension years. \n29. \nNinth, to give the House a sense of the financial burden, BRP payments in the last \nfiscal year exceeded the total Government spending on education, health, and housing \ncombined. \n30. \nWithout reform, expenditure on pension will crowd out critical investment in \neducation, health and housing.  \n31. \nTenth, to finance this increasingly rising expenditure, Government has had to borrow \nmassively, thus raising the public sector debt to an alarming level of 90 per cent of GDP. \n32. \nWithout reform, debt will continue to rise as a share of GDP. \n33. \nEleventh, debt servicing has risen sharply and is the second most important \nexpenditure after pension today. It amounted to a staggering Rs21.8 billion in fiscal year \n2024-2025. \n34. \nWithout reform, the country will spend a rising share of its expenditure on debt \nservicing, thus crowding out key priorities.  \n35. \nAs early as 2015, the IMF, in an expert report, projected that by 2050, expenditure on \nBRP would be at an unsustainable level of 8 percent of GDP. Because of the irresponsible \ndecisions taken by the previous government, believe it or not, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we are \nalready at 7.8% now, that is, around 25 years ahead of what the IMF had projected! \n36. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, no politician likes to make unpopular decisions. However, \nunchecked and unreformed, rising expenditures on BRP will significantly penalise our \nchildren and grandchildren.  \n37. \nThis is about intergenerational fairness and equity. \n38. \nWe have no choice, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, than to act responsibility. \n\n77 \n \n39. \nI fully understand that pension reform can be an unpopular choice for today's voters, \npresenting a dilemma for politicians sensitive to public opinion and also those engaged in \nreckless populism and unbridled demagogy.  \n40. \nFor all the reasons mentioned above, pension reforms are vital to rebalancing the \nburdens across present and future generations in a fair and equitable manner. This may entail \nshort-term costs, but for long-term sustainability. \n41. \nIt is why it is imperative that the general public is aware of pension reform and the \nchallenges to be faced in the future. \n42. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, there is an utter confusion in the mind of many people \nbetween a contributory and a non-contributory pension. A contributory pension plan requires \nthe beneficiary to pay into the plan from his salary (like occupation pensions).  In a non-\ncontributory pension plan, the beneficiary does not contribute anything at all for the benefit \nhe receives. \n43. \nThe BRP is a non-contributory pension. There is no contribution from beneficiaries. It \nis funded from the Consolidated Fund.  \n44. \nAs such, all increases in the BRP can only be financed through higher debt or higher \ntaxes. \n45. \nUnder a contributory pension system, an employee can choose to retire earlier than \nthe prescribed retirement age and benefit from a reduced pension. \n46. \nThis, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, does not apply to the BRP which is, as I said, non-\ncontributory. Eligibility to BRP is typically not based on employment history or prior \ncontributions, but rather on factors such as age and residency. In other countries, it also \ndepends on income and asset of beneficiaries. \n47. \nLet me also clear another confusion about the retirement age.   \n48. \nThe budget has not changed the retirement age.  We have not changed it! \n49. \nThe retirement age was at 65, and it remains at 65.   \n50. \nFlexibility for early retirement for those in specific sectors has not changed for \ncontributory pension. \n51. \nWe are only aligning the entitlement to BRP with the retirement age in order, again, to \nensure fiscal sustainability.  \n\n78 \n \n52. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the dire financial predicament we have inherited demands \nimmediate and decisive fiscal consolidation. Without prompt corrective measures, we risk to \nfollow the trajectory of countries such as Sri Lanka or Greece, nations that delayed essential \nreforms and ultimately faced severe financial crises, forcing them to accept tough, externally \nimposed bailout conditions. \n53. \nThe previous government's legacy bears troubling similarities to those examples.  \nTheir pattern of unchecked and reckless spending has placed our public finances in dire \nstraits.  As a result, our national debt is projected to rise to Rs642 billion by the end of June \n2025, equivalent to 90 percent of GDP, highlighting the urgent need to restore fiscal \ndiscipline and rebuild economic resilience. \n54. \nThere is a very high risk of the country being downgraded if there is no fiscal \nconsolidation. I wish to remind the House that a downgrade to a ‘junk status’ would have \nvery, very serious implications on the cost of borrowings, our financial services sector, the \nvalue of the rupee, investments, FDI, and the economy as a whole. No one, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir, would invest in a country which has the status of ‘junk.’ \n55. \nWe simply cannot afford a downgrade from ‘investment status’ to ‘junk status.’ \n56. \nAs a responsible Government, we could not ignore the risks posed by our \nunsustainable pension system - not only to public finances, but also to the well-being of our \nelderly population. \n57. \nWe have no choice than to reform our shockingly unsustainable pension system. \nUnreformed, there would be no financial resources to pay for future pensions, even for those \nabove 65 years. \n58. \nThere is hardly any country that has the rare combination of providing old age \npension to all those above 60 without any contribution and without a means test. \n59. \n In fact, several developed countries have embraced two of the following three \nmeasures: \n(a) \nextension of the retirement age to 65 and beyond, I just mentioned France \nand Germany;  \n(b) \nintroduction of a contributory element in the system with exemptions for \nlow-income earners, and \n\n79 \n \n(c) \nadoption of a means-tested systems for old-age pensions so as to allocate \npublic resources more efficiently and equitably and target support to those \nwho are in need.   \n60. \nIn these systems, eligibility for a pension or the amount received is based on \nhousehold income and/or assets. Countries such as Australia, Canada, Japan, South korea and \nChile use means-tests as an eligibility criterion for old age pension.   \n61. \nMr Deputy Speaker, in the light of the devastating legacy left by the previous \nadministration, we had no choice but to confront the urgent need for pension reform head on.  \nHowever, we remain deeply mindful of the challenges the most vulnerable may face under \nthe proposed changes and we are committed to addressing their concerns with compassion \nand empathy. \n62. \nAs a democratic Government, we have heard these concerns.  As a compassionate \nGovernment that is committed to stand by the most vulnerable at all times, we have decided \nto establish two Inter-Ministerial Committees to examine the matters related to the Basic \nRetirement Pension. \n63. \nThe first Committee will explore potential income support for individuals aged \nbetween 60 and 65 who will become ineligible as a result of the reform and whose main or \nsole source of income is the BRP. This will cover a range of beneficiaries such as \nhousewives, retirees and workers with low occupation pension, who all rely mainly or solely \non the BRP.   \n64.    This Committee will be chaired by myself and comprise the Deputy Prime Minister, \nMinister of Financial Services and Economic Planning, Minister of Energy and Public \nUtilities, Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations, the Minister of Industry, SMEs and \nCooperatives, the Junior Minister of Finance and Junior Minister of Social Integration, Social \nSecurity and National Solidarity.   \n65. \nThe second Committee will examine potential support for individuals who are unable \nto work due to health-related disabilities.  This Committee will be chaired by the Minister of \nSocial Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity and comprise the Minister of \nHousing and Lands, the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and \n\n80 \n \nFisheries, the Minister of National Infrastructure, Minister of Health and Wellness and the \nMinister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade.  \n66. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the escalating financial burden on future generations from an \nageing society is a challenge faced by most countries.  \n67. \nIf the current demographic trajectory of Mauritius persists, then our pension system \nwill simply run out of money. Let me be very candid, the BRP system is the time bomb. It is \na time bomb that is fast ticking away. However, it is unfortunate that many do not seem to \nreally care or worry as they will no longer be around when the bomb will explode. Worse, Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, a highly respected professional actuary has stated that this time bomb \nhas already exploded; that we now face the urgent and up healed task of containing the \ndamage. \n68. \nConsequently, pension reform is absolutely critical. \n69. \nIt aims at enhancing financial sustainability. \n70. \nAt the heart of this reform is the imperative to establish parity between what each \ngeneration pays and receives, thereby promoting fairness in intergenerational burden-sharing.  \nThank you. \nPUBLIC BILLS \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the following Bills were read a first time – \n(a) \nThe Revenue Tribunal Bill (No. XIII of 2025) \n(b) \nThe Legal Aid and Legal Assistance Bill (No. XII Of 2025) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Madam Speaker will take the Chair. \nAt this stage, Madam Speaker took the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please, be seated. Yes, hon. Prime Minister. \n \n\n81 \n \nPOINT OF PERSONAL EXPLANATION \nBUDGET SPEECH 2025-2026 – PARAGRAPH 272 \n(3.49 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I wish to make the \nfollowing statement by way of personal explanation under Standing Order 28.  \nWith a view to dispelling any doubt about the interpretation of paragraph 272 of the \nBudget Speech 2025-2026 relating to Fair Share Contribution of 15%, I would like to inform \nthe House that it relates to a high-income earner, earning annual net income exceeding Rs12 \nmillion, inclusive of dividend income received during the year from domestic companies, \nwho will be required to pay a Fair Share Contribution at the rate of 15% of his chargeable \nincome in excess of Rs12 million. \nConsequently, paragraphs 275 and 276 as they appear in the printed version of the \nBudget Speech should be disregarded. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nPUBLIC BILL \nSecond Reading \nTHE APPROPRIATION (2025-2026) BILL  \n(NO. XIV OF 2025) \nOrder read for resuming adjourned debate on the Second Reading of the Appropriation \n(2025-2026) Bill (No. XIV of 2025). \nQuestion again proposed. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. Hon. Leader of the Opposition! \n(3.50 p.m.) \nThe Leader of the Opposition (Mr G. Lesjongard): Merci, Madame la présidente. I \nthink we should be able to agree on two things – one, that this budget is a budget de rupture à \nla FMI and that this budget de rupture à la FMI est le contraire of the electoral platform on \nwhich the Labour Party was elected. When I am saying that, I am not making a value \njudgement. I will explain why I believe that it is a statement of fact: I said budget de rupture \nà la FMI. \nNow bear in mind, Madam Speaker, that those are not my words. I have merely quoted \nhon. Paul Bérenger as Leader of Opposition during his intervention on the Budget 2006-\n2007, and this statement, Madam Speaker, summarises also the 2025/2026 budget, that is, the \n\n82 \n \nabolition of the pension for those between 60 years and 65 years, the review of subsidies and \nthe abolition of various social and educational allocations – un budget à la FMI. \nMadame la présidente, nous débutons aujourd’hui les débats sur l’Appropriation (2025-\n2026) Bill, le premier budget proposé par L’alliance du Changement, et c’est un budget qui \ntrahit la confiance de la population qui a cru en vos promesses pendant la campagne \nélectorale. \nDans chaque budget, il y a du bon, il y a du moins bon et parfois, il y a du pa bon ditou. \nMalheureusement et tristement pour ce peuple, ce budget a très peu de bonnes mesures et \nbeaucoup de pa bon ditou, Madame la présidente. \nPour qualifier ce budget 2025-2026, je me suis permis, au tout début de mon \nintervention, d’emprunter les mots utilisés par un des membres les plus influents de l’actuel \ngouvernement, le 22 juin 2006 – presque 19 ans de cela – « Le Budget de rupture à la FMI. »  \nL’histoire se répète, Madame la présidente ! En 2005, le gouvernement travailliste \nd’alors avait affirmé vouloir changer la vie des gens en 100 jours. Malheureusement, la vie de \nchaque Mauricien était devenue amère après ces 100 jours ! À cette époque, il y régnait la \nmême situation : une rupture totale entre la population et le gouvernement. C’est le même \nsentiment avec ce budget de rupture où l’on étouffe toute une population avec ce budget \naustère.  \nLe constat, Madame la présidente, c’est – je le répète parce que c’est important – la \nrupture. Et rupture, il y a eu. Elle est réelle, mais elle est entre le gouvernement et toute une \npopulation, incluant aussi les habitants de Rodrigues et d’Agaléga. Une grande majorité de la \npopulation sera au fond des abîmes avec la mise en place des mesures antisociales annoncées \ndans le présent budget. Madame la présidente, c’est le démantèlement de l’État providence ! \nCe sera un drame humain pour des milliers de familles mauriciennes. Trois ans de souffrance \npour le peuple et attendre peut-être à la veille des élections de 2029 pour récolter des miettes. \nMadame la présidente, quand on sait ce que l’Alliance du Changement avait promis à la \npopulation et ce qui a été annoncé dans le budget, et sans aucun doute, je l’ai dit quand je suis \nintervenu juste après la présentation du budget, c’est la plus grande trahison électorale de \nnotre histoire. Madame la présidente, par exemple, en Corée du Sud, l’article 250 de la loi \nélectorale condamne les fausses promesses faites pendant une campagne électorale. Peut-être \nqu’il est temps de légiférer sur les promesses électorales ! \nAn hon. Member: Delo 24/7! \n\n83 \n \nMr Lesjongard: La Constitutional Commission qui sera mise sur pied à Maurice… \nAn hon. Member: Delo 24/7, trahison! \nMr Lesjongard: …pourrait peut-être se pencher sur une telle législation. \nMadame la présidente, je suis tenté de poser cette question : sommes-nous devenus, \navec ce gouvernement, les cobayes des institutions internationales ? Laissez-moi remonter le \ntemps. Sir Anerood Jugnauth, en tant que Premier ministre, n’a jamais cédé face à des \ninstitutions même pendant les périodes les plus difficiles de notre pays, c’est-à-dire les années \n80. \nMadame la présidente, il y a eu du changement depuis la prise de pouvoir de ce \ngouvernement. Je ne mets pas en doute la capacité du Junior Minister, l’honorable Damry, \nmais de mémoire, c’est la première fois qu’un Junior Minister préside les consultations avec \nles stakeholders pour la préparation du budget.  \n(Interruptions) \nJe comprends que l’honorable membre est considéré par beaucoup au sein de l’Alliance \ndu Changement – je ne dirai pas comme the preferred one – mais comme the next one, \nMadame la présidente.  \n(Interruptions) \nMais de là de lui donner de tels pouvoirs et de telles responsabilités seulement sept mois \naprès les élections, cela doit nous interpeller, Madame la présidente. \n(Interruptions) \nAu sein de la majorité, on fait de l’honorable membre, maintenant, le bouc émissaire de \nl’impopularité de ce gouvernement ! \n(Interruptions) \nMais nous savons tous que c’est le Premier ministre et le Cabinet ministériel qui sont \nresponsables de l’abolition de la pension pour les 60 à 65 ans et de toutes ces taxes imposées \nsur la population.  \nMadame la présidente, ce qui nous interpelle aujourd’hui, c’est le manque de cohésion \net définitivement l’amateurisme dans la préparation du budget. C’est le résultat de la \nmauvaise cohabitation entre les rouges, les mauves et les papillons, Madame la présidente. \n\n84 \n \n An hon. Member: Profet maler! Profet maler komanse! \nMr Lesjongard: Depuis sa prise de pouvoir, l’establishment politique longtemps dans \nl’opposition s’adapte difficilement avec l’administration publique. Par exemple, le musical \nchair presque hebdomadaire des fonctionnaires, le recrutement des officiers retraités sur \ncontrat en sont les preuves. Un chapelet de promesses électorales, et après la victoire, ce \ngouvernement vient nous parler de l’état de l’économie comme prétexte pour ne pas tenir \nleurs promesses. \nIl y a eu depuis novembre 2024, ce que je qualifierai, Madame la présidente, d’un \nmanagement of public opinion très précis, avec comme leitmotiv la kaiss vid. Un rapport sur \nl’état de l’économie très douteux ! \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: 642 milliards ! \n (Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard: Un rapport sur l’état de l’économie… \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Tiroir vid! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard: I need your protection, Madam Speaker, to be able to speak! \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members: Ahh! Ha, ha, ha! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members! \n(Interruptions) \nMs Savabaddy: … devan… \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Ms Savabaddy! \n(Interruptions) \nMs Savabaddy: Yes? \n\n85 \n \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: I am on my feet!  \nHon. Members, I would rather that the Leader of the Opposition, also given the fact that \nthere are just two of them, be allowed to make his speech. It is his right. Do not interrupt him \ntoo much! \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members: Ha, ha, ha! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: No, I cannot… \n(Interruptions) \nEven you are laughing! \n(Interruptions) \nNo, I do not… \n(Interruptions) \nI cannot stop you from laughing or reacting subtly, but be subtle. Be subtle! Let him \nspeak! \nMr Jhummun: Speak sense! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: He will speak for quite… \n(Interruptions) \nHe has the right to speak for quite some time! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Jhummun: Sense! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Jhummun, I am speaking and I am on my feet! He has the right \nto speak for quite some time. Let him speak! You will get the chance to reply!  \nPlease, hon. Leader of the Opposition! \n\n86 \n \nMr Lesjongard: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Un rapport sur l’état de l’économie très \ndouteux et non signé, mais préparé par des consultants, à en croire le Junior Minister. La \nkaiss vid, mais en même temps, plusieurs des ministres ont voyagé au frais de l’État. \nApparemment, 33 voyages en huit mois ! Achat de voitures neuves par les ministres, incluant \nle Premier ministre !  \nIs this a budget that will go down in history? Well, yes! But if it does, Madam Speaker, \nit will be for all the wrong reasons, and in particular, it might go down in history as the \nbudget that started the dismantling of the Welfare State in our country, and… \n(Interruptions) \n…and the disappearance of the safety net for the working class and the more vulnerable of \nour society, Madam Speaker. There is no doubt that this Government won on the back of \npromises and pledges to alleviate the cost-of-living crisis and restore people’s purchasing \npower. But instead, this Government, in its first budget, has stripped our social security \nsystem to the bones. It provides neither security nor enough support to those who received it. \nUnsurprisingly, Madam Speaker, this budget will play into the sense that politicians \nwill say anything to win votes.  \nMr Jhummun: Delo 24/7! \nMr Lesjongard: Mais, Madame la présidente, aujourd’hui grâce à l’internet, les \nparoles ne s’envolent plus !  \nAn hon. Member: Internet bloke ! \nMr Lesjongard: Les belles paroles, les fausses promesses et les engagements pris \npendant la campagne électorale sont toujours présents dans la mémoire de la population. \n Qui ne se souvient pas de ces fameuses expressions : ‘Lesans pou bese par plis ki R \n20.’ ‘Kouma mo vinn minis Lenerzi, mo pou bes pri kouran.’ Weetabix monte hogal ba ! \nDudh monte hogal ba! Lanti monte hogal ba ! Paissa ke mol naiba! Aaj ka bolba beti. \nMadame la présidente, permettez-moi de faire quelques commentaires sur les mesures \nannoncées pour différents secteurs. En premier, l’économie… \nMadam Speaker: I suppose you think that everybody would have understood you. \n\n87 \n \nMr Lesjongard: Of course, Madam Speaker.  \nMs Anquetil: Je n’ai pas compris ! \nMr Lesjongard: Of course! If they voted for this Government, everybody has \nunderstood what was said at that time. \nMr A. Duval: It is a very popular saying! \nMr Lesjongard: Yes! \nMr Jhummun: So seve inn’ grene lakoz sa ! \nMr Lesjongard: Ma première… \n(Interruptions) \nNo, Madam Speaker, the Standing Order is clear. He has to withdraw what he said. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, you have to withdraw. That is a personal attack! You have to \nwithdraw nicely. Nicely! \nMr Jhummun: I did not mention any name. \nMadam Speaker: No, you did! You did! Come on, be nice! \nMr Jhummun: Okay, I withdraw. \nMadam Speaker: Voilà! \nMr A. Duval: He should apologise! \nMr Lesjongard: Then, you are a gentleman! \nMa première interrogation concerne l’utilisation des revenus pour la location de Diego \nGarcia pour éponger une partie de la dette publique. Est-ce raisonnable d’inclure cette somme \ns’il y a aucune garantie de recevoir ces fonds cette année ? Je constate aussi qu’il n’y a rien \ndans ce budget pour le développement des Chagos ni même une étude pour le développement \npotentiel des Chagos. \n\n88 \n \nMadam Speaker, let me now come to the anonymous ‘State of the Economy’ document. \nC’est indéniable, aujourd’hui, qu’avec ce document, il y a eu une tentative de la part du \ngouvernement de créer un chaos économique et social dans le pays juste après les élections. \nCe document non-signé a entravé la confiance des investisseurs et a réussi à établir une \npsychose au sein de la population. Un document qui est anonyme et biaisé ! \nLe Junior Minister, l’honorable Damry, lors d’une émission à la radio, a affirmé que \ndes consultants ont travaillé sur ce rapport, mais il ne donne pas le nom de ces consultants. Et \nc’est la première fois, si je ne me trompe pas, Madame la présidente, que des consultants \nproduisent un rapport pour le gouvernement, déposé au Parlement, et ils ne déclinent pas leur \nidentité. Maintenant, c’est le privé qui va vérifier et déterminer le travail des hauts cadres du \ngouvernement. \nJe le redis, l’objectif de ce document était d’instaurer la peur parmi la population en \nprélude du Budget, en faisant croire que les finances de l’État sont faibles, que les dettes \npubliques sont insoutenables… \nAn hon. Member: Ce qui n’est pas faux ! \nMr Lesjongard: …et que le gouvernement ne peut plus continuer à soutenir les \ndifférentes couches de la population avec l’aide financière sociale introduite par l’ancien \ngouvernement. En effet, ce n’était qu’un stratagème politique pour justifier la politique \néconomique de ser sintir. Les membres du gouvernement, les députés se sont appuyés sur \n« les épaules » de Moody’s, ils parlent de chaos économique et même de junk status. \nAprès la présentation de ce budget, le gouvernement est K.O. face à la colère du peuple. \nLa note émise par Moody’s jeudi dernier vient jeter le doute sur les mesures annoncées par ce \ngouvernement. Ils veulent plaire en imposant des taxes exorbitantes, en réduisant les \nallocations sociales, mais ces mêmes instances vous disent que vos mesures vont appauvrir la \npopulation. \nIt is a fact, Madam Speaker, that some key economic indicators, as published by this \nGovernment itself, show that our economy was resilient and robust in 2024. \n(Interruptions) \n\n89 \n \nFor example, the gross official international reserves of the country stood at USD 8.5 billion \nas at end of December 2024 against USD 7.3 billion a year earlier. The employment rate, \nMadam Speaker, dropped to 6% in 2024. Total investment in the country has increased by \n8.3% and Mauritius attracted Rs33 billion in FDI in 2024, and tourism arrivals have been \nsurpassed, pre-COVID figures, in 2024, to reach 1.38 million. \nIn addition, Madam Speaker, another report, the IMF, in its Article IV Report in 2024, \nhas lauded Mauritius for its income inequality reduction philosophy. The IMF has \ncommended Mauritius for fostering inclusive growth by protecting households impacted by \nthe rising cost of living since 2022, broadening social benefits to the most vulnerable and \nfostering entrepreneurship. \nMadam Speaker, the World Bank Country Outlook on Mauritius, published in 2025, \nstated that our economy has proven resilient to other global economic shocks, including those \nstemming from the war in Ukraine which have affected revenues from tourism arrivals. \nMadam Speaker, with regard now to public debt, in November 2024, when this \nGovernment took over from us, total public sector debt was at Rs546 billion. This public \nsector debt has spiked to Rs642 billion – an increase of Rs96 billion in the last seven months! \nThe Government has contracted loans for Rs96 billion during the first seven months, Madam \nSpeaker. Is this what we call fiscal discipline and fiscal responsibility? \nNow, with regard to GDP projections, we were all taken aback to witness the \ndownsizing of the drop in the last six months of the Financial Year 2024-2025, that is, from \nJanuary 2025 to June 2025, under this new Government. It is evidently clear, Madam \nSpeaker, that the Government has been dormant in the first seven months of its mandate or \npurposely, let me put it this way, doing so to retard the growth process by hindering strategic \ninstitutional functions like the EDB, the FSC and the NSLD, to name a few. \nJe vais maintenant aborder l’une des mesures les plus controversables de ce quart de \nsiècle dans ce budget – la pension de vieillesse gouvernementale pour ceux âgés de 60 à 65 \nans. Madame la présidente, deux comités seront mis sur pied pour revoir la pension, cela a été \ndit. Une annonce qui intervient seulement onze jours après le premier budget de ce \ngouvernement. C’est ça le changement ! Annoncer des mesures et ensuite mettre des comités \nministériels pour revoir si la mesure peut être applicable ou pas. À travers les deux comités \n\n90 \n \nmis sur pied, l’intention du gouvernement est claire, et le Premier ministre l’a annoncé plus \ntôt, c’est le ciblage. Alors, on va déshabiller Michael maintenant pour habiller Jackson ! \nMr Etwareea : On va déshabiller Joe ! \nMr Lesjongard : Dix jours de cela, le Premier ministre, lors d’une interview, trouvait \nle ciblage comme une injustice. Hier, le cabinet ministériel, sous la présidence du Premier \nministre, a décidé de mettre en place deux comités pour travailler sur le ciblage. \nEffectivement, lors d’une interview à la MBC, le Premier ministre avait dit qu’il trouvait le \nciblage injuste. Tout comme la grande majorité de la population, Madame la présidente, je \nsuis contre le ciblage.  \nAvec ces propositions, vous essayez d’apaiser la colère, mais ce n’est pas le cas. La \npolitique de diviser la population sur ce sujet ne marchera pas cette fois-ci. Maintenant, il y a \ndes questions qu’on doit se poser. Doit-on passer par un test médical pour être éligible à la \npension quand on sait comment fonctionnent ces board médicaux à la Sécurité sociale ? Et je \nm’adresse aux membres de cette auguste Assemblée pou get figir pou gagn pansion ? \nAn hon. Member : Dix ans… \nMr Lesjongard : Agent de tel parti politik, lerla ou pou gagn pansion! La suppression \nde la pension de vieillesse gouvernementale pour ceux âgés de 60 à 65 ans est une des \nmesures des plus injustes envers nos travailleurs et les femmes au foyer. L’histoire retiendra, \nMadame la présidente, que c’est un gouvernement qui comprend trois partis politiques qui \nont pris naissance dans la lutte des travailleurs de notre pays qui se disent socialistes : le PTr, \nle MMM et Rezistans ek Alternativ qui ont pris cette décision. \nDans ma toute première déclaration à la presse, après le budget, j’ai déploré l’absence \nde consultation avant l’introduction de cette mesure. Le gouvernement a agi unilatéralement \npour détériorer la vie de toute la société civile de notre pays. Je ne suis pas le seul à l’avoir \névoqué. Tous les syndicats ont reproché au gouvernement l’absence de consultation. Hier, le \nministre de la Sécurité sociale a publiquement critiqué le Premier ministre sur une radio pour \nmanque de consultation. Rezistans ek Alternativ, qui fait partie du gouvernement, a émis un \ncommuniqué pour dire la même chose, c’est-à-dire le manque de consultation.  \nPermettez-moi, Madame la présidente, de faire quelques observations pertinentes sur \nles déclarations faites et le contenu de ce communiqué en date du 14 juin. Est-ce que les \nmembres de Rezistans ek Alternativ ne savent pas si ce parti a un ministre au sein de ce \n\n91 \n \ngouvernement et qu’il a droit à la parole au sein du Conseil des ministres ? Mais comme \ndisait, Madame la présidente, Jean-Pierre Chevènement, ancien ministre français – \n« Un ministre, ça ferme sa gueule. Si ça veut l'ouvrir, ça démissionne. »  \nJe pose cette fameuse expression, Madame la présidente, à l’appréciation de la population.  \nAutre remarque sur ce même communiqué, est-ce normal que le président du conseil \nd’administration du musée de l’esclavage soit cosignataire de ce communiqué politique ? Je \npense qu’il faut répondre à ces questions. Ce gouvernement est entouré des conseillers de \ngrandes expériences, mais malgré cela, ce gouvernement a commis une des plus grandes \ngaffes politiques depuis notre indépendance avec la mesure sur la pension des 60 à 65 ans. \nMadame la présidente, au paragraphe 240 du discours du budget, je cite – \n“In order to address this burning issue, we are setting up a Commission of Experts to \nmake recommendations to reform the various pillars of our pension system, including \nrevamping the National Pension Fund to replace the CSG. I will personally chair a \nSteering Committee to assess and act on the recommendations of the Commission.” \nEnsuite, au paragraphe 248, je cite – \n“The age eligibility for BRP is being increased to 65 years. Out of compassion, we are \nphasing that increase over a period of 5 years.” \nDonc, pareil encore, ils annulent la pension pour les 60 à 65 ans. Ils abolissent la CSG et \nensuite, ils mettent en place des comités pour réformer le système de pension.  \nMadame la présidente, excusez-moi, c’est mettre la charrue devant les bœufs. Un \nprocessus, encore une fois, qui démontre un amateurisme flagrant en matière de gestion. Pas \nde consultation ni aucune étude sur l’effet de cette mesure sur la population. \nMadame la présidente, je vois dans ce budget une répétition du budget de 2006, sauf \nque cette fois-ci, l’implémentation est différente. Et là, permettez-moi de remercier et de \nsaluer le courage des syndicalistes qui à l’époque – là, je parle de 2006 – s’étaient \nunanimement soulevés contre cette mesure. Le gouvernement de 2005 à 2010 avait dû faire \nmarche arrière. J’espère, Madame la présidente, que ce sera une fois de plus le cas et que le \ngouvernement va rétablir la pension pour tous. Pour moi, il ne peut y avoir de compromis sur \nce sujet. \n\n92 \n \nLa révision de l’âge de la retraite est déjà une réalité, il est vrai, dans certains pays de \nl’hémisphère nord. Mais, écoutez-moi bien, ces pays sont très développés premièrement et \nont une qualité de vie reconnue mondialement. Ces pays ont une espérance de vie plus élevée \nque chez nous.  \nDans la plupart des secteurs d’activité à Maurice, la semaine de travail est de 45 heures \nalors qu’en Europe, elle est de 40 heures ou de moins de 40 heures par semaine. \nMalheureusement, il n’y a rien dans ce budget qui démontre que le gouvernement compte \nrevoir à la baisse les heures du travail avec l’implémentation de cette mesure. Au contraire, \navec les mesures antisociales dans ce budget, les travailleurs de notre pays auront beaucoup \nplus à travailler pour pouvoir arrondir leurs fins de mois.  \nImaginez les effets de leurs activités sur leur santé ! 20% de notre population est \ndiabétique. 30% de notre population souffrent d’hypertension. Les personnes âgées sont les \nplus touchées. Notre espérance de vie, M. le Premier ministre, est de 74 ans alors que dans \nplusieurs pays où il y a eu une vision de l’âge de la retraite, l’espérance de vie dépasse les 80 \nans. Donc, le citoyen de notre République aura à travailler plus en termes d’heures de travail \net d’années de travail que ceux de l’hémisphère nord. Il aura à cotiser plus puisqu’il devra le \nfaire jusqu’à l’âge de 65 ans pour peut-être profiter de sa pension que pour quelques années. \nPeut-être certains parmi eux ne toucheront même pas cette pension, Madame la présidente. \nI put the question: is it fair? The answer is no, Madam Speaker! \nMadame la présidente, ce pays qualifié comme un overcrowded barracoon, dans les \nannées 70 par l’écrivain V. S. Naipau1, est aujourd’hui un pays classé régulièrement en \npremière position sur le continent dans plusieurs secteurs et cela, grâce au sacrifice de ces \nmauriciennes et mauriciens qui ont travaillé dur au fil des années. \nJe vais maintenant, Madame la présidente, aborder une autre mesure qui va affecter \ntoute la population et qui se trouve au paragraphe 17 (b) de l’annexe du budget – \nMr Jhummun: Mo ouver li!  \nMr Lesjongard:   \n“Government will implement reforms of public enterprises to ensure they are \nfinancially sustainable, efficient, and accountable, through a coordinated policy \napproach focused on strengthening governance and oversight, institutionalizing \nfinancial discipline, and reforming pricing and subsidy frameworks.” \n\n93 \n \nEt, je m’arrête là, Madame la présidente. Il n’y a aucun problème que le gouvernement \ncompte réformer certains secteurs. Par contre, sous ce même item, les mots qui doivent \ninterpeller la population sont ‘reforming pricing and subsidy frameworks’ \nMadame la présidente, en 2006, le gouvernement d’alors avait préconisé l’abolition des \nsubsides sur le riz et la farine. Et, dans ce budget, le présent budget, de façon déguisée, on \nnous annonce la fin des subsides. \nAn hon. Member :  Qu’est-ce que c’est ça ? \nMr Lesjongard: La population doit s’attendre à une augmentation du prix de la farine, \ndu riz ration, du gaz ménagé, du pain et aussi des centaines d’autres produits. C’est aussi \nl’annonce de la fin des subsides sur la facture d’électricité et de l’eau pour les familles les \nplus vulnérables. \nMadame la présidente, 61 000 familles qui bénéficient du social tariff 110 du CEB, et \n60 000 familles qui bénéficie de 6 m³ d’eau gratuit, seront directement impactées par cette \nmesure. \nMadame la présidente, c’est un gouvernement anti-subsides, pro patronat tout comme \ncelui de 2005 à 2010. Et pour faire court, c’est un gouvernement sans cœur.  \nAn hon. Member: Démagogie! \nMr Jhummun: Tonn fer li vinn negatif! \nMadam Speaker: Be careful! \nMr A. Duval: Il faut le laisser causer, Madame. \nMadam Speaker: Of course! \nMr A. Duval: But this guy is …  \nAn hon. Member: C’est le Parlement ! \nMadam Speaker : But, il a le droit de parler ! \nIl semblerait que vous n’êtes pas en train de bien citer ce qu’il y a dans le document en \nquestion. \nMr Jhummun: Exactement ! \nMr Lesjongard: Non je suis en train de citer ! \n(Interruptions) \n\n94 \n \nMadam Speaker: You will reply. You will reply.  \nMr A. Duval: There will be 64 people to rebut him, let him speak!  \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: What are you telling me by sitting down? \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: 64 persons! I can’t speak from sitting down? \nMadam Speaker: I will not accept that all the time, hon. A. Duval tells me how to do \nmy job and by sitting down all the time! \nI want to be quite clear on this. This is not the first time! \nAn hon. Member: Malelve! Malelve! \nMadam Speaker: If you are not happy, you must make a …  \n(Interruptions) \nHon. DPM, please, I am on my feet! \nYou must stand up and make a point of order, then I will listen to you, but stop telling \nme, by sitting down all the time, how to do my job.  \nAn hon. Member: Li pe apran! \nAn hon. Member: Shut up!  \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, if I may… Madam Speaker, I was raising your \nattention…  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Ey ki pe explike! \nMadam Speaker: if you raise a point of order, you must tell me under which Standing \nOrder! \nMr A. Duval: It is a point of order, Madam Speaker. \nMr Bhagwan: Apologise! Malelve! \nMr A. Duval: The Leader of the Opposition is being interrupted… \nMadam Speaker: Under which Standing Order? \n(Interruptions) \n\n95 \n \nAnd, I think that the hon. Leader of the Opposition has been in this House for a very \nlong time and he can defend himself. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, you will see under points of order, firstly, Standing \nOrder 40…  \nMadam Speaker: Let me see! \nMr A. Duval: Yes!  \nThe use of unbecoming expressions, offensive language about Members which is being \nused repetitively against the Leader of Opposition, that’s the first thing.  \nMadam Speaker: No, please sit down. I will stop you now because that was not at this \nstage. When there was an offensive language, what did I do, hon. A. Duval? \nI asked the Member to withdraw and he did!  \nPlease, all of you, let him get on with his speech. He will be criticising; that’s what he \nis here for and then you will rebut him.  Please, take note! \nMr A. Duval: If I may raise a second point of order? \nMr Jhummun: May I raise a point of order? \nMadam Speaker: No, I am not allowing anybody to speak at this time! \nMr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, je veux faire un point de droit, je suis obligé de \nle faire ! \nMadam Speaker: Okay, that’s it. Point de droit ! Allez-y ! \nMr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, je suis responsable du secteur de l’énergie, \nd’électricité. J’ai pris le Leader de l’opposition en flagrant délit de mentir à l’Assemblée \nnationale.  \nÇa n’a jamais été cité dans le budget et le Leader de l’opposition lit le budget à l’envers \net il vient dire n'importe quoi… \nAn hon. Member : Menteur ! \nMr Assirvaden: Ce n’est pas possible ! Il faudra qu’il se rétracte ! \nAn hon. Member : Menteur ! \nMadam Speaker: Vous avez la possibilité de répondre, Monsieur le ministre ! \n\n96 \n \n(Interruptions) \nBe very careful, hon. Leader…  \nMr Baloomoody: He is misleading the House. He is misleading the nation. \nMadam Speaker : Même mon Deputy m’empêche de parler ! \n(Interruptions) \nDon’t make it so difficult for everybody. You going to stay here until two o’clock in the \nmorning if you want. \nThen, let’s all be responsible. Let’s start by you, hon. Leader of the Opposition. \n(Interruptions) \nNo, no, I am saying because you are on your feet! \nIn fact, you are on your feet when I am. \nMr Lesjongard: Yes, if you tell me to sit down, I will sit down, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Because I see you very well when you stand on your feet. Lucky \nme! \nSo, what I am going to say – make sure that you are giving proper facts. \nWhat the Minister is saying is that when you speak, if he does not reply immediately, \nit’s going on record, it’s going in everybody’s house and it’s going to be in the press \ntomorrow.  \nSo, you have to be responsible as well! Just make sure that you are giving facts – \nproper facts, and you cite page and you cite the article or whatever.  \nLet me say something; I want to say something. All of you have a look at Standing \nOrder 73 (2) about the debate on the Appropriation Bill. \nThe debate on the Appropriation Bill – \n“(…) shall be confined to the general principles of Government policy and \nadministration as indicated by the Bill and the Estimates.” \nThat’s what the debate is about.  \n\n97 \n \nSo, I can understand that sometimes everybody is making reference to the past \ngovernment but basically, we are here to debate on the Bill and the estimates. So, please, \ncarry on! \nMr Lesjongard: Madam Speaker, first of all, I referred to a paragraph in the annex to \nthe Budget Speech and this is my right to do so.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay! \nMr Lesjongard: I read that paragraph and I read it again – \n“Government will implement reforms of public enterprises to ensure they are \nfinancially sustainable, efficient, and accountable, through a coordinated policy \napproach focused on strengthening governance and oversight, institutionalizing \nfinancial discipline, and reforming pricing and subsidy frameworks.’’ \nFrom the same paragraph, those institutions are the Mauritius Post Ltd, Metro Express \nLtd., National Transport Corporation Ltd., Mauritius Multisports Infrastructure Ltd., \nPolytechnics Mauritius Ltd., Central Water Authority, Waste Water Management Authority, \nIrrigation Authority, Agricultural Marketing Board, Central Electricity Board, State \nInvestment Corporation, Casinos and State Trading Corporation. \n(Interruptions) \nSo, this is very relevant to what I am saying. \nIf they want to rebut, they will rebut when they have the floor. They cannot interrupt \nme every now and then, Madam Speaker. That is why I asked for your protection because I \nwant to read my speech. \n(Interruptions) \nPour faire court, je le redis, Madame la présidente, c’est un gouvernement sans cœur ; \nsans cœur pour les plus vulnérables, sans cœur pour les commerçants ayant des revenus de \nplus de R 3 millions, mais bon cœur pour ceux ayant des revenus de plus de R 24 millions.  \nMadame la présidente, nous avons célébré cette année les 50 ans de mai 75, quand des \nmilliers de jeunes de ce pays s’étaient dressés contre un gouvernement abusif pour avoir \nl’éducation gratuite. J’ai fait partie de cette génération. Et ce 20 mai, j’étais parmi ceux qui \nétaient sur le pont de la Grande Rivière Nord-Ouest face aux soldats de la SSU. \n\n98 \n \nCertains, cette année-ci, ont manqué cet événement, mais je note que les célébrations \nétaient timides, car le gouvernement d’alors était travailliste et les manifestants étaient pour la \nplupart des militants. Nous avons grandement amélioré l’éducation gratuite avec l’éducation \ntertiaire en 2019 pour finalement rendre l’éducation pré-primaire gratuite en 2024. Ainsi, \nrendre tout le cycle éducationnel gratuit.  \n50 ans après mai 75, ce gouvernement vient briser le rêve des milliers de jeunes \nMauriciens et Mauriciennes en les obligeant désormais, c’est-à-dire je fais référence au part \ntimers à payer la totalité des frais de leurs études tertiaires. Un crime, Madame la présidente ! \nL’explication du Junior Minister of Finance démonte l’arrogance de ce gouvernement. Sur \nune radio privée où j’y étais moi aussi invité, voilà ce qu’il avait dit pour soutenir cette \nmesure. Pour lui, ces personnes travaillent déjà. Ils peuvent payer ; alors qu’ils payent ! \nQuelle arrogance, Madame la présidente ! \nIl n’y a rien de plus noble qu’une personne qui travaille à plein temps et qui va suivre \ndes cours après les heures. Est-ce qu’il sait que beaucoup de ces part timers sont des mères et \ndes pères de famille qui maintenant doivent faire beaucoup plus d’efforts ? Imaginez-vous un \ninstant que ces personnes touchent le salaire minimum, savez-vous combien coûte un \nsemestre ? Non seulement ces jeunes doivent s’endetter pour l’obtention d’un lopin de terre, \nla construction d’une maison qui va coûter plus cher ou l’achat d’un véhicule qui va coûter \nplus cher aussi. Maintenant, pour obtenir un diplôme, ils doivent aussi s’endetter, alors que \nc’était gratuit. \nOn connaît déjà le résultat. Beaucoup parmi eux vont abandonner. Il y a aussi, Madame \nla présidente, les autres mesures qui vont grandement affecter nos enfants. L’arrêt du free Pre \nPrimary Education Scheme, l’arrêt du Comprehensive Grant formula, le retrait des subsides – \nje trouve cela bête ! – accordé aux repeaters de la SC et HSC qui ne seront maintenant que \npour les familles tombant sous le SRM. L’abolition de l’allocation de R 20,000 à ceux \natteignant l’âge de 18 ans. \nMadame la présidente, ce gouvernement ose parler d’empathie et de compassion dans \nce budget ? Où se trouve la compassion de ce budget ? Une à une, vous êtes en train \nd’enlever les pierres qui constituent la fondation même de l’État providence. Vous aviez \npromis de soulager ce peuple, et aujourd’hui, vous êtes en train de faire absolument le \ncontraire. Quand on parle du pouvoir d’achat avec ce gouvernement, ils évoquent que la \n\n99 \n \ncaisse est vide. Une des plus grandes promesses faites à la population était la baisse du prix \ndu carburant après les élections par au moins R 30 avait dit le Premier ministre. \nAn hon. Member: R 20!  \nMr Lesjongard: R 20 ? Allez, R 20! \nMr A. Duval: 30%! \nMr Lesjongard: Quand j’ai évoqué la baisse du prix du carburant à travers une PNQ, \nle ministre de tutelle avait mis en avant la situation financière de la STC et la situation du \nPrice Stabilisation Account. \nMr A. Duval: Lessence in baisse la ! \nMr Lesjongard: Mais comparativement aux cinq dernières années, le prix du pétrole \nsur le marché mondial a drastiquement baissé ces derniers mois. Maintenant, vous allez…. \n(Interruptions) \n…vous servir du conflit entre l’Iran et Israël pour augmenter le prix. \nLe gouvernement joue aux ignorants en ce qui concerne le déficit de la Stabilisation \nAccount de la STC, alors que, je l’ai dit, tous les comptes-rendus et toutes les décisions prises \npar la STC sont rendus publiques. Et cela depuis plusieurs années ! Que ce soit sur le site de \nla STC ou dans les journaux. \nAn hon. Member: 7 miliar defisit CEB! \nMr Lesjongard: Encore une autre promesse non tenue par ce gouvernement concerne \nles R 10 milliards promis pour améliorer le pouvoir d’achat de la population. Ce budget ne \nprévoit que R 2 milliards dans un Price Stabilisation Fund. La question, c’est qui va \nbénéficier directement de ce fonds ? Les consommateurs ? Les importateurs ? Ou les \nrevendeurs ? Va-t-on enrichir les gros importateurs ou certains revendeurs qui font d’énormes \nmarges de profits en leur offrant des rebates pour ne pas augmenter le prix. This is not clear \nin the budget, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Somebody will clarify! \nMr Lesjongard: La population attendait aussi une autre mesure concernant la baisse \ndu prix de l’électricité. Le ministre actuel avait fait une telle promesse avant les élections. \nMais ne vous servez pas comme prétexte la situation financière du CEB. C’est vrai qu’il y \navait un déficit, mais le CEB commence à engranger des surplus de plus de R 200 millions \n\n100 \n \nmensuellement. Le prix du charbon est passé de 559 dollars en décembre 2022 à 107 dollars \nen avril 2025. Le coût de production a nettement baissé. Le prix de l’huile lourde utilisée par \nle CEB a aussi connu une baisse de 30 dollars la tonne métrique. La forte hausse de \nconsommation de novembre 2024 à avril 2025 a fait que le CEB a enregistré de gros revenus. \nEncore une promesse non tenue par ce gouvernement ! \nJ’aborde le sujet de l’énergie parce que c’est un budget décevant sur cet aspect. Je parle \nici d’un waste to energy project et d’un fonds d’investissement de R 30 milliards sur trois ans \npour des projets d’énergie renouvelable et de biomasse. R 30 milliards d’investissements du \nprivé ou du gouvernement ? Quels sont les projets identifiés qui seront mis en place ? Ce \nn’est pas mentionné dans le budget. Même au CEB on est étonné de cette annonce, puisqu’il \nn’y a eu aucune consultation avec les cadres du CEB et aucun nouveau projet d’énergie \nrenouvelable n’a été identifié. \nMadame la présidente, c’est l’investissement des projets de l’ancien gouvernement qui \nest considéré dans le présent budget. Ce sont les projets sous le Carbon Neutral Industrial \nSector Scheme du CEB, lancé en janvier 2023 et le renewable hybrid facility lancé en 2022 \nqui vont apporter l’investissement de 30 milliards et le ministre de tutelle ‘beau parleur’ n’a \nrien apporté de nouveau. \nMadam Speaker: Here you go, vous aussi vous ajoutez un petit bout. \nMr Lesjongard: Non, mais il est un beau parleur Madame. Je le dis. C’est un \ncompliment. \nAn hon. Member:  Il est beau parleur mais pas menteur. \nMr Lesjongard: Je note une incohérence flagrante dans la stratégie énergétique du \ngouvernement. Le 08 mai dernier, lors d’une conférence de presse animée par le ministre, il \navait affirmé que le gouvernement n’a pas de choix et devra avoir recours à un powership – \nune centrale énergétique sur une barge flottante pour fournir l’électricité au pays pendant les \ncinq prochaines années. \nLe powership utilisera l’huile lourde comme matière première et en plus, vous taxez \nfortement les voitures hybrides et électriques. Par contre, Madame la présidente, le budget \nprévoit, je cite le paragraphe 290 (2) – \n\n101 \n \n “Clean energy, Climate Change Adaptation and Migitation to lower imports of fossil \nfuels and Co2 emission while enhancing resilience to unpredictable climatic events and \nboosting economy growth.” \nWhich is which, Madam Speaker?  \nEn ce qui concerne la Rivière des Anguilles dam, il n’y a qu’une étape avant… \n(Interruptions) \nIl n’y a qu’une étape avant de lancer l’appel d’offres. Tout a été fait par l’ancien \ngouvernement, le pre-feasibility du projet et le financement par les pays amis.  \nDans trois ans, si le ministre sera toujours là, le ministre actuel aura l’honneur de coupe \nriban et de se vanter d’avoir accompli ce projet tout comme des projets d’énergies \nrenouvelables qui sont actuellement en chantier. \nPour ce qui est du secteur du transport, encore un coup de massue pour les \nautomobilistes. Augmentation drastique de frais de la déclaration et désormais les détenteurs \nde plaques personnalisées devront s’acquitter des frais annuels. Je me demande si cette \nmesure est légale premièrement, sans oublier, Madame la présidente, l’explosion des prix des \nvoitures avec les taxes imposées dans ce budget. \nJe vais maintenant, Madame la présidente, aborder le secteur de la construction. Cela \nest important. Ce budget va détruire le secteur de la construction et du property development \nà Maurice.  \nThe construction industry is more than just steel and concrete; it is a pillar of our \neconomy. It sustains thousands of professionals, architects, engineers, notaries and support \nskilled trade people, electricians, brick layers, plumbers, carpenters. It drives entire industries \nfrom material suppliers and logistics firms to furniture maker and real Estate brokers.  \nC’est connu que quand le secteur de la construction affiche bonne mine, cela a une \nrépercussion positive sur l’ensemble de l’économie. \n(Interruptions) \nL’ancien gouvernement avait vu juste en investissant massivement dans ce secteur et \nd’en faire un pôle de croissance. Le pays a connu un développement infrastructurel sans \nprécédent en cinq ans avec une quarantaine de projets routiers majeurs, plus de 600 projets de \n\n102 \n \ndrains, environ 4000 logements sociaux, un terminal moderne, le Victoria Urban Terminal et \nle métro qui relie désormais nos cinq villes.  \n(Interruptions) \n Et tout d’un coup ce secteur est à l’arrêt total avec l’avènement de ce nouveau \ngouvernement.  \nNot only is this budget suffocating the foreign driven residential market, it does not \nsupport the domestic one. The popular home ownership scheme which refunded up to 5% of \nthe purchase of price for locals has been scrapped. This was a life line particularly for young \nMauritians hoping to buy their first home. Its removal, Madam Speaker, will be deeply felt. \nMadam Speaker, only 2 major infrastructure projects have been announced and both \nscheduled for year 3 of a 5-year plan that is, the M4 and the Phase 2 of the Ring Road. The \nFlagship of 12 thousand social housing units programme is being discontinued, replaced with \na meagre 1050 units to be constructed over a period of 58 years. Even the Metro Express \nextension has been put on hold. \nMadam Speaker, let me remind this House that Smart Cities have been a key engine of \nour national development. They attracted FDI, created thousands of jobs and served as \nbeacons of innovation and sustainable urbanization. Withdrawing this framework overnight \nwithout a viable alternative sends the worst possible message to investors that Mauritius is no \nlonger a reliable, stable or predictable place to invest. Projects risk being abandoned and the \nthousands of Mauritians whose livelihood depends on this sector, risk job losses. \nMadame la présidente, deux termes qui sont revenus souvent dans le budget sont \nl’intelligence artificielle et le digital. Encore une fois, je ne comprends pas comment ce \ngouvernement peut foncer tête baissée dans cette voie sans les consultations nécessaires et \nsans suivre la procédure qu’il faut. We are still learning about AI and it maybe…. \nAn hon. Member: You are. \nMr Lesjongard: It may be very dangerous for our society. L’intelligence artificielle va \naffecter tout le monde et les effets sont déjà présents. Je vais vous citer George Hinton, le \nparrain de l’intelligence artificielle et il dit – \n« Désormais les perspectives d’avenir de IA sont plutôt plus effrayantes pour les \nhumains. Pour le moment, elles ne sont pas plus intelligentes que nous pour ce que j’en \nsais, mais je pense qu’elles pourront bientôt l’être » \n\n103 \n \nIl redoute que les gens normaux ne puissent plus distinguer le vrai du faux. Les craintes \nportent la création massive des vidéos, des photos et d’articles fallacieux sur l’Internet. Ces \narguments, Madame la présidente, nous concernent directement. L’utilisation de IA pour la \ndiffusion des fausses informations et l’effet de l’intelligence artificielle sur le monde de \nl’emploi pourraient être catastrophique dans une décennie. \nJe ne suis pas contre l’introduction de IA dans le secteur éducatif et dans le secteur \npublic. Cela pourrait diminuer la lenteur administrative mais rien n’est dit dans ce budget \nsur la législation et la mise en place d’une autorité pour l’utilisation de l’intelligence \nartificielle. \nAn hon. Member: Inn met blue print lorla. \nMr Lesjongard: Il est temps de faire une étude de l’impact de l’intelligence artificielle \nsur les différents secteurs de l’économie afin de protéger l’emploi et nous devons éviter que \nl’intelligence artificielle affecte notre population négativement. Madame la présidente, avec \ntoutes les mesures antisociales que contienne ce budget et surtout les injustices sociales qu’il \nva provoquer, je crains que nous ne nous dirigions vers une crise sociale sans précédent. \nDéjà, la situation du Law and order devient problématique dans le pays. Une force policière \ndémotivée et en manque d’effectif. Malheureusement, il ne se passe pas une journée dans \nnotre pays sans qu’on apprenne qu’un nouveau crime a été commis.  \n(Interruptions) \nPresque tous les matins, les réseaux sociaux sont inondés par des cas liés à la \ndétérioration de la situation ; kout sab, kidnapping, braquage, des attaques en plein jour… \n(Interruptions) \n…vol, viol, agression et encore des cadavres ! \nMr Jhummun: Kistnen ! Kistnen ! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard: Et des meurtres. \n(Interruptions) \nConcernant Rodrigues, Madame la présidente, il y a une mesure que je trouve qui va \ngrandement affecter directement les Rodriguais, mais aussi le secteur touristique à Rodrigues. \n\n104 \n \nJ’espère que les représentants de Rodrigues vont faire part de leur désapprobation à l’égard \nde cette mesure. C’est le prix du billet d’avion sur Rodrigues. \nMr Pentiah: Madam Speaker, I have a point of order, please! \nMr Lesjongard: Voulez-vous… \nMadam Speaker: Point of order! Yes! \nMr Pentiah: Madam Speaker, I refer to paragraph 42(1). We are not meant to be \nabused, listen to lies and go away from the relevancy of the debate. Standing Order 42(1)… \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: One moment! Let me find Standing Order 42! \nMr Pentiah: Standing Order 42(1), Madam Speaker, … \nMadam Speaker: One moment! One moment! \nMr Pentiah: Standing Order 42(1) – \n“42. (1)   Debate upon any motion, Bill or amendment shall be relevant to such motion, \nBill or amendment, except in the case of a motion for the adjournment of the \nAssembly.” \nMadam Speaker: I rule that it is perfectly relevant. Please! Please! \nMr Pentiah: Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Be careful, hon. Leader of the Opposition. You are now talking \nabout social problems in general. So, I know what he means. So, be careful, okay? \nMr Lesjongard: Madame la présidente, j’étais en train de faire référence à nos amis de \nRodrigues concernant la mesure budgétaire sur le prix des billets d’avion sur Rodrigues. \nMadame la présidente, on nous parle d’un budget responsable. Le vrai budget \nresponsable, c’était celui de 2020, quand l’économie de ce pays était à genoux, et il fallait \nassurer les salaires de tous les travailleurs de ce pays, y compris les self-employed pendant \nqu’ils étaient chez eux. Soutenir toutes les entreprises de ce pays pour éviter… \nMadam Speaker: Venons-en à ce projet ! \nMr Lesjongard: … un licenciement massif qui allait mettre sur paille plus de 100 000 \nfoyers. Nous avons évité le pire et nous en sommes fiers. Et aujourd’hui, on nous parle de \n\n105 \n \nbudget responsable alors que nous ne sommes plus en situation de force majeure. Vous avez \ntrahi ce peuple. Vous avez fait des promesses pour gagner les élections… \nMadam Speaker: You are supposed to address me! \nMr Lesjongard: …mais vous saviez que vous n’allez pas les tenir ! \nMadam Speaker: Mo pann trayir personn!  \n(Interruptions) \nSo, address me! \n(Interruptions) \nBe careful, you are talking to me! \nMr Lesjongard: Yes, but I need to address you when I make my speech. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! But then, you cannot say ‘you are’! \nAn hon. Member: Say the Government! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard: You, meaning the Government, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: No, it does not mean that! \nMr Lesjongard: I am referring to them, not to you! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Leader of the Opposition, I am so sorry. I am not going to stop \nyou from talking. I am just saying even including the interruptions, I have allowed you one \nhour more or less already. Can we have an idea of how long you are going to be again? \nMr Lesjongard: I am almost finishing, Madam Speaker. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Alright, alright!  \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members, please!  \nCarry on! You were on Rodrigues, on the promises. \nMr Lesjongard: I am done with Rodrigues! \n\n106 \n \nMadam Speaker: You were on promises. \nMr Lesjongard: I am done with Rodrigues. What I was saying was vous avez trahi ce \npeuple. Vous meaning le gouvernement ! \nVous avez fait des promesses pour gagner les élections, mais vous saviez que vous \nn’alliez pas les tenir. Voilà vos réalisations depuis votre arrivée au pouvoir. Vous avez fait fuir \nles investisseurs. Vous avez augmenté la dette publique de R 96 milliards. Aujourd’hui, vous \ndémantelez l’État providence et vous avez réduit considérablement le pouvoir d’achat des \nMauriciens sous prétexte qu’il faut sauver notre économie.  \nIl y a quelques années, un membre de cette auguste Assemblée, un membre qui est très \nrespecté, avait affirmé aux membres du gouvernement d’alors qu’ils devront porter des gilets \nbar ross.  \n(Interruptions) \nMr Bhagwan: Twa ki bizin barr ross! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard: Je me pose la question, Madame la présidente, qui va porter ces gilets \nbar ross maintenant ? \n(Interruptions) \nCette mince opposition ou cette majorité de 64 membres ? \n(Interruptions) \nMr Bhagwan:To enkor pa pe kapav… \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard: Votre grande victoire de 60-0 est peut-être votre plus grande faiblesse, \ncar tout est permis ici. Mais tout n’est pas permis, comme aime dire l’honorable Dr. Arvin \nBoolell ‘out there!’ \nLe peuple est en colère contre ce gouvernement. C’est fort probablement le dernier \nmandat pour plusieurs membres de cette Assemblée. \n(Interruptions) \n\n107 \n \nNous avons tous connu des moments de gloire, de défaite et des moments compliqués \nau sein des gouvernements. Mais, à la fin de ce mandat, nous allons nous rapprocher. Et ce \nsera à vous, je m’adresse aux jeunes députés… \n(Interruptions) \n…ce sera à vous de porter ce fardeau d’avoir aboli cette pension. Malheureusement, \nvous aurez la responsabilité des décisions prises par un think-tank privatisé.  \nQue Dieu protège notre population, Madame la présidente. Merci ! \nMadam Speaker: Thank you ! Well, that was perfect timing!  \nWe shall break for half an hour. \nAt 5.00 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.33 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, we have the quorum. Hon. Minister of Labour! \nThe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations (Mr R. Uteem): Madame la \nprésidente, le véritable leadership ne se mesure pas aux applaudissements, mais aux prises de \ndécisions dans les moments difficiles. C’est dans ces choix difficiles que se construise \nl’avenir d’une nation. Et je salue le Premier ministre et le Deputy Prime Minister qui ont eu le \ncourage de prendre des décisions, certes impopulaires, mais nécessaires. Là, où d’autres \nauraient préféré la facilité, le populisme, ils ont pris leurs responsabilités afin d’assurer un \navenir meilleur pour nos enfants.  \nIl est dommage que l’honorable leader de l’opposition n’ait pas cru nécessaire de \ns’asseoir et d’écouter la réplique que j’aurai à lui donner. C’est un peu dommage ! Dans une \ndémocratie, on s’attend à ce que le leader de l’opposition, au moins, il écoute à l’intervention \nde celui qui parle après lui. \nLe leader de l’opposition nous accuse, nous, au sein de ce gouvernement, de n’avoir pas \ntenu toutes nos promesses. Mais, en vérité, on est élu pour une période de 5 ans, Madame la \nprésidente. Donc, on a 5 ans pour implémenter notre programme, nos promesses électorales \net aussi notre programme gouvernemental. Et sans doute, on aurait fait plus cette année si on \nn’avait pas hérité de la situation économique catastrophique que nous a léguée le \ngouvernement sortant. \n\n108 \n \nCe que je trouve dommage, Madame la présidente, c’est qu’après toute ces années \npassées au Parlement et au gouvernement, le leader de l’opposition fait semblant qu’il ne \ncomprend pas c’est quoi un budget, c’est quoi un déficit budgétaire. Pourtant, un budget \nnational n’est pas vraiment différent d’un budget ménager. On reçoit des revenus, on fait des \ndépenses et quand nos dépenses dépassent nos revenus, la différence s’appelle déficit \nbudgétaire. Prenons l’exemple d’une famille qui touche R 25 000 chaque mois. Forcément, \nelle ne va pas dépenser plus de R 25 000. Mais allons dire qu’elle a dépensé R 30 000, le \ndéficit budgétaire est de R 5 000. Comment est-ce-que cette famille va faire pour avoir des \ndépenses de R 30 000 ? Elle aura à emprunter R 5 000. Mais si elle emprunte R 5 000, le \nmois prochain, elle doit payer les intérêts, et donc, ses dépenses continuent à augmenter. Elle \ncontinue à emprunter plus, et là, elle entre dans une spirale et, finalement, elle se retrouve à \nvivre au crédit. Finalement, elle travaille que pour rembourser ses dettes. Et puis, un jour \narrive où la banque lui téléphone et lui dit : ‘Je n’ai plus confiance en votre capacité de \nrepayer vos obligations.’ La personne voit ses articles saisis, sa maison allée à l’encan. Elle \nest déclarée en faillite. On la place dans ce qu’on appelle le Mauritius Credit Information \nBureau, MCIB ; on lui colle l’étiquette de client à risque, mauvais payeur.  Elle devient en \nfaillite. Est-ce que c’est ça que l’honorable leader de l’opposition veut pour l’île Maurice ? \nQu’on continue à s’endetter continuellement jusqu’à ce qu’on nous colle l’étiquette de \nmauvais payeur, de junk status ? \nPendant ces dix dernières années, Madame la présidente, le gouvernement MSM n’a \ncessé de dépenser au-delà de ses moyens. Le gouvernement MSM a saigné le pays à blanc, \nsacrifiant l’avenir national sur l’autel de leurs intérêts électoralistes et leur soif du pouvoir. Et \nle gouvernement MSM n’a jamais eu le courage de dire la vérité en face. On se souvient, le \npremier budget du Dr. Padayachy, ministre des Finances, il parlait déjà de balanced budget \nou budget équilibré parce qu’il aimait s’exprimer dans la langue de Molière. Faux ! \nComplètement faux ! Faire croire à la population qu’elle dépense un même montant qu’elle \nreçoit en revenu alors qu’il venait de braquer la Banque centrale et prendre R 60 milliards des \nréserves publiques. C’était ça le MSM ! La tromperie dans leur ADN ! Et chaque année, ils \nfaisaient la même chose. Ils venaient, dans le budget, sous-estimer les dépenses, surestimer \nles revenus pour sous-estimer les déficits budgétaires, pour faire croire qu’ils sont un \ngouvernement raisonnable et qu’ils ne dépensent pas plus que ce qu’ils ont. Et qu’est-ce qui \ns’est passé ? Chaque année, une fois, deux fois, trois fois, il y avait des budgets \n\n109 \n \nsupplémentaires, des Supplementary Appropriation Bills où le gouvernement ratifiait les \ndépenses qu’il n’avait pas budgétisées, et l’année dernière, ils en ont fait de même. \nLe leader de l’opposition nous parle tout le temps de document, State of the Economy, \nqui est anonyme. Mais, est-ce qu’il remet en question le Budget Estimates ? Est-ce qu’il peut \nremettre en question le document officiel du ministère des Finances qui vient confirmer \nchaque information qui était publiée dans le State of Economy ? Et qu’est-ce que ce document \ndémontre, Madame la présidente ? À la page 11 – \n“There is a notable discrepancy between the initial fiscal targets and the revised \nestimated for FY 2024-2025. Total revenue was lower by Rs 28.3 billion while total \nexpenditure was higher by Rs 14.9 billion.” \nJe vous explique cela très clairement. Ils avaient prévu des dépenses là, des revenus ici \n– la différence : 4.9%. En vérité, les dépenses sont là, les revenus sont là et le déficit \nbudgétaire est de 9.6% ! Ils ont sous-estimé, sous-évalué par 70 milliards ! \nMr Jhummun: Better be late than never! \nMr Uteem: Je suis content Monsieur le leader de l’opposition que vous prenez place \nparce que je viens d’expliquer comment votre gouvernement, dont vous faisiez partie, année \naprès année, a menti au public en faisant croire que vous aviez une politique fiscale \nresponsable, alors que chaque année, vous sous-estimiez les dépenses et vous surestimiez vos \nrevenus.  \nDonc, le problème, Madame la présidente, c’est que quand on sous-estime les dépenses \net qu’on surestime les revenus, on se retrouve avec un manque à gagner, un déficit élargi. Et, \ncomme je l’ai expliqué, quelqu’un qui touche R 25 000 et qui a des dépenses de R 30 000, il \nlui faut emprunter R 5 000. Maintenant, si cette famille a mal calculé et, au lieu d’avoir des \ndépenses de R 30 000, elle a R 35 000 et au lieu d’avoir des revenus de R 25 000, elle a R 20 \n000, c’est R 15 000 qu’elle doit emprunter. Et c’est cela qui explique pourquoi, aujourd’hui, \non se retrouve avec une dette publique qui avoisine le 90 %. C’est parce que, eux, le \ngouvernement précédent, ils ont menti. Ce n’est pas qu’on ait dépensé plus. La seule dépense \nqu’on a faite dès la prise de pouvoir de ce gouvernement, qui n'était pas budgétée, c’est le \nquatorzième mois qu’on a payé – seule dépense ! C’était pour les bénéfices des 90% des \n\n110 \n \ntravailleurs de ce pays ! Mais les autres, la différence, ça s’explique, parce que le \ngouvernement précédent a surestimé nos revenus et sous-estimé les dépenses.  \nLa conséquence, Madame la présidente, quand, aujourd’hui, on se retrouve avec 90 % \nde dettes par rapport au PIB, c’est on ne peut plus emprunter, sinon on va se retrouver sur le \nMCIB. On aura un junk status et ce n’est pas spéculatif. Si on voit ce que Moody’s a dit en \ndébut de l’année, en janvier, il nous a prévenu, et je cite – \n“Delays in fiscal consolidation that lead to a persistently large fiscal deficit, causing \ndebt to stabilise at elevated levels, would likely result in a downgrade.” \nCe n’est pas spéculatif. Moody’s nous dit : ‘si vous continuez à dépenser comme vous \nle faites et vous continuez à avoir une dette publique élevée, vous allez être downgraded’ – \npas spéculatif. C’est la position dans laquelle le gouvernement MSM nous a laissé.  \nPourtant en 2014, lorsque le premier gouvernement MSM entre au pouvoir, le credit \nrating de Maurice était de Baa1 qui était très respectable pour un pays comme notre île et \npuis sous le régime du MSM, on a été downgraded deux fois Baa2 et puis Baa3 et \naujourd’hui on est à la limite, on a la limite de l’investment grade. Si on est downgraded, si \nMoody’s pense qu’on a l’incapacité de rembourser nos dettes parce que nos dettes sont trop \nélevées, on devient junk status. Et comme l’a très bien expliqué l’honorable Premier ministre \ntout à l’heure lors du statement time : si on est downgraded, on n’est plus investment grade, \non devient junk status, on peut dire ‘bye-bye’ au secteur offshore, ‘bye-bye’ secteur financier, \n‘bye-bye’ investissements, ‘bye-bye’ les personnes qui vont venir ici pour investir ; ils ne \nvont jamais venir s’il pense qu’on a une incapacité de rembourser nos dettes.  \nMais pire encore, toutes les banques qui aujourd’hui prêtent aux mauriciens, ces \nbanques-là quand elles vont devoir faire des prêts de l’extérieur, elles devront payer plus cher, \nà un taux d’intérêt plus fort et qu’est-ce qu’elles vont faire ? Elles vont répercuter cette \naugmentation du coût sur tous les mauriciens. Donc, il faut très bien comprendre cela, \nMadame la présidente, si on est downgraded, tous les mauriciens qui ont un housing loan, qui \nont un bank overdraft, qui ont un car loan, tous les mauriciens auront à payer plus en termes \nd’intérêt. Comment est-ce qu’on peut rester les bras croisés face à une telle situation ? La \nsolution, Madame la présidente, il n’y en a pas quatre milles, tous les ménagers le savent. \nQuand vous avez des dépenses qui sont trop élevées par rapport à vos revenus, il n’y a pas \ndix milles solutions, vous devez réduire vos dépenses et augmenter vos revenus et c’est ce \n\n111 \n \nqu’on est en train de faire dans ce budget. On ne peut pas emprunter plus, donc, on a \nforcément à trouver des revenus ailleurs et couper nos dépenses.  \nMaintenant, prenons les revenus. On va commencer par des reformes. On va \ncommencer par investir dans des projets qui vont générer une croissance, qui vont générer \ndéveloppement et on va miser surtout sur l’innovation, recherche et technologie mais aussi \npour chaque pôle de développement dans nos secteurs traditionnels, dans le budget on a \nannoncé plusieurs mesures pour relancer ces divers secteurs. \nLe leader de l’opposition, en citant l’annexe tout à l’heure, nous parlait de, c’était à la \nparagraphe (b) page 24, que le gouvernement va faire des reformes dans des entreprises \npubliques pour institutionnaliser une discipline financière et cela entraînera reforming the \npricing and subsidy framework. Donc, lui il a compris cela comme voulant dire qu’on est en \ntrain d’éliminer et de réduire les subsides. Non, Madame la présidente, tout le contraire. \nContrairement à eux, qui n’ont fait que dilapider les fonds publics, nous on reforme chaque \ninstitution. On va s’assurer qu’il n’y a pas de gaspillage et quand on aurait fini avec le good \ngovernance, forcément on aura une meilleure gestion et à ce moment, ces différent corps \nparaétatiques vont plus avoir besoin du montant des subsides qu’on est en train de donner de \nla caisse publique. Ce n’est pas qu’on réduit le subside sur les prix de l’électricité, non, on est \nen train de faire CEB, CWA, Wastewater Authority, toutes les institutions, on va leur faire \ndevenir plus performantes. On aura des performance, des KPIs et ils devront deliver. Et \nquand ils vont deliver, forcément c’est le public qui sera bénéficiaire de ces améliorations des \nservices.  \nMais, Madame la présidente, malheureusement ces réformes qu’on propose, \nl’élimination des gaspillages, cela va nous ramener à R 5 milliards d’économie sur les \nprochaines trois années mais ce ne sera pas suffisant. Il faut encore des revenus. Donc, là \naussi on a un choix faire, la facilité aurait été d’augmenter la TVA, 1%, 2%, 3%, c’est la \nfaçon la plus facile de récupérer de l’argent. Mais quand on augmente la TVA, c’est toute la \npopulation qui paye. Et ceux qui souffrent le plus sont ceux au bas de l’échelle, parce qu’en \ntermes de pourcentage, quand on augmente la TVA et que tous les produits augmentent, ce \nsont les petits qui sont les plus vulnérables. C’est pourquoi on a choisi, non seulement de ne \npas augmenter la TVA mais au contraire, on a pris la décision de réduire la TVA sur certains \nitems, notamment sur les produits en conserve, les tomates en conserve, sur les légumes \n\n112 \n \nfrigorifiés, les aliments de base, les produits pour bébé. Donc, c’est pour les produits de \nconsommation qu’on a enlevé la TVA pour justement baisser. \nMais quand on a pris la décision de ne pas toucher à la TVA, forcément il faut chercher \nde l’argent auprès de l’income tax, les impôts. Là aussi, on a fait un choix, qui va payer ? Est-\nce que tout le monde paye la même quantité d’impôts ? On augmente pour tout le monde ? \nOn a pris une décision, on a décidé d’imposer plus sur ceux qui ont les moyens de payer. Les \nindividus qui touchent plus de R 12 millions, ils vont payer une taxe additionnelle de 15%. \nLes sociétés, les compagnies qui gagnent plus de R 24 millions, ils vont payer 5% de plus. \nLes banques vont payer 2.5% de plus. Donc, ce sont les grosses fortunes qui vont payer le \nplus sous l’item de l’impôt et là aussi, on ne veut pas avoir l’étiquette de high tax \ngovernment. Le Premier ministre l’a déjà dit, on va revoir toutes ces mesures dans trois ans \nparce que dans trois ans les reformes qu’on va amener, vont apporter leurs fruits et on pourra \nrevoir la fiscalité et retourner vers une fiscalité légère. \nOn a aussi décidé qu’il y avait certains projets qui engendraient beaucoup d’argent mais \nqui n’étaient pas imposable. Je parle là des Smart City. Les Smart City Projects, Madame la \nprésidente, sont exonérés d’impôts pendant huit ans et là on parle des projets immobiliers qui \nsont vendus dans la plupart des cas à des étrangers qui ont les moyens de payer. Donc, on \nparle de gros profits. Donc, ces entreprises de Smart City ne payaient pas d’impôts pendant \nhuit ans, ne payaient pas de TVA sur les matériaux de construction, ne payaient pas de land \nconversion tax, ne payaient pas de registration duty. Un manque à gagner de plusieurs \nmilliards de roupies. Ça c’était l’ancien régime – caring for the rich. Ar nou non ! Les gens \nqui sont dans les Smart City Scheme doivent payer la taxe comme n’importe qui. Au \ncontraire, ils ont les moyens de payer plus, on aurait dû les faire payer plus. \nMadame la présidente, sous le gouvernement MSM le pouvoir d’achat des mauriciens a \nconsidérablement baissé, et là aussi, les plus affectés étaient naturellement ceux au bas de \nl’échelle. Afin que les gens aient plus d’argent pour leurs dépenses – écoutez bien M. le \nleader de l’opposition – on a augmenté le seuil d’impôts à R 500,000, donc un salarié qui \ntouche moins de R 38 000 par mois ou un self-employed qui touche moins de R 41 500 par \nmois ne paient pas d’impôts dans Maurice. 81% des salariés ne paieront pas d’impôts. Jamais \naucun gouvernement n’a autant fait pour les travailleurs et c’est ça un gouvernement \nTravailliste/MMM/Rezistans ek Alternativ avec l’appui des Nouveaux Démocrates. \n\n113 \n \nMadame la présidente, avec les réformes de taxes, 75 000 personnes qui touchent moins \nd’un million de roupies paieront moins de taxes. Payer moins de taxes veut dire avoir plus \nd’argent disponible. Donc, au lieu de donner des transferts directs aux personnes, on ne leur \nprend pas la taxe. Donc, ils auront plus d’argent dans les poches et ils pourront plus dépenser. \nDonc, quand les gens pensent ou disent qu’on est en train de couper des allocations ici, \nallocations là-bas. Non, mais réfléchissez ! Vous aurez plus d’argent parce que vous ne \npaierez plus d’impôts. Vous aurez plus d’argent et vous pouvez décider ce que vous allez \nfaire de cet argent. Si vous voulez dépenser ou vous voulez payer vos dettes, c’est à vous de \ndécider. \nMadame présidente, l’augmentation des revenus additionnels que l’État percevra à \ntravers les impôts, les mesures que je viens d’énumérer, le fair share contribution, mais aussi \nsur excise duty sur les cigarettes, boissons et voitures, ne sera, malheureusement, pas suffisant \npour réduire le déficit budgétaire à un niveau acceptable. On devra réduire les dépenses. \nEn premier lieu, on va prendre les mesures nécessaires pour réduire les gaspillages de \nfonds comme je viens de l’expliquer. Plus des contrats juteux aux petits copains et petites \ncopines. Ce matin, encore, on a entendu de l’honorable Premier ministre, comment certaines \npersonnes proches du pouvoir bénéficiaient à coût de millions de roupies, de milliards de \nroupies de largesse de l’ancien gouvernement. \nMr Bhagwan : Milyon zot pa kone! \nMr Uteem : On a entendu comment l’ancien directeur de l’ICAC touchait un salaire \nindécent, payé en devises s’il vous plaît. Donc, fini ces dépenses inutiles. Fini les dépenses \ninutiles comme la construction du stade Côte D’Or. Fini les ruptures abusives des contrats qui \nnous ont valu des milliards de roupies des dommages à la BAI, à Betamax, à Patel \nEngineering. Plus jamais cela. Cela va nous permettre d’économiser au moins R 5 milliards \nsur les trois prochaines années. \nMalheureusement, Madame la présidente, là aussi ce n’est pas suffisant parce qu’avec \nune dette de 90 % du PIB et un déficit budgétaire de 9 %, il faut baisser encore les dépenses. \nEt, ce n’est pas de gaité de cœur, Madame la présidente, qu’on aura à réduire les dépenses \npubliques et cesser les paiements des certaines allocations. On a dû faire un choix ; un choix \ndifficile.  \nQu’aurions-nous dû faire, Madame la présidente ? Aurions-nous dû couper le budget de \nla Santé alors qu’on a une population vieillissante qui a besoin de soins et des médicaments ? \n\n114 \n \nIl y a un manque de personnel dans nos services hospitalier. Devrions-nous faire comme \nl’ancien régime et ne pas payer les heures supplémentaires, overtime des médecins et des \ninfirmiers ? Aurions-nous dû revoir l’éducation gratuite, réduire les grants alloués aux \ndiverses institutions éducatives ? Aurions-nous dû sacrifier les projets d’utilité publique, la \ngestion de l’eau alors qu’on demande à la population de faire des sacrifices car le précédent \nrégime n’a pas construit des nouveaux dams y compris le fameux Rivière des Anguilles dam \n? Je ne parle même pas de la promesse de dilo 24/7 et le changement des vieux tuyaux.  \nDevrions-nous sacrifier l’augmentation de notre capacité énergétique alors qu’on vient \nde traverser une crise sans précédent frôlant le délestage, load shedding ? Là aussi, parce que \nl’ancien régime – et le leader de l’opposition était ministre de l’énergie – durant le règne de \nJugnauth, ils n’ont pas construit de nouvelles centrales électriques.  \nOu bien, aurions-nous dû cesser le système à toutes à l’égout et prendre le risque d’une \ncatastrophe hygiénique ? Et les drains, dans ma propre circonscription, à Port-Louis, qui ont \nsubi de plein fouet les pluies torrentielles et les flash flood. À St-Jean, Coromandel, Fond du \nSac, Canal Dayot et les autres régions à haut risque, doit-on construire des drains ou pas ?   \nLes maisons sociales ? Plus de 40 000 familles sont en attente pour un logement social \ny compris plusieurs milliers des familles démunies qui sont inscrites sur le registre social. On \nconstruit ou on ne construit pas ? \nLa préservation de l’environnement, le sport, les investissements dans les \ninfrastructures publiques, dans le port, dans nos réseaux routiers. Dites-nous, Madame la \nprésidente, qu’est-ce qu’on aurait dû couper, qu’est-ce qu’on aurait dû sacrifier ? Le budget \nde la sécurité sociale ? En vérité, on a même augmenté le budget du ministère de la Sécurité \nsociale par rapport à l’année dernière. Ce n’est pas évident ! Ce n’est pas évident de faire un \nchoix de réduire les dépenses publiques.  \nMadame la présidente, malheureusement, on a dû faire un choix ; un choix \nextrêmement difficile. On a dû repousser l’âge de la pension. Le paiement de la pension \nuniverselle est la plus grosse dépense du gouvernement et représente, à elle seule, quelque 25 \n% de dépenses courantes.  \nLe régime de la pension universelle, Basic Retirement Pension, dans sa forme actuelle, \nest insoutenable. Tout le monde le sait et cela ne date pas d’hier. En 2004, Pravind Jugnauth \nétait alors ministre des Finances. L’honorable leader de l’opposition était dans le front bench \ndu gouvernement. En présentant son budget, voilà ce que Pravind Jugnauth a dit, je cite – \n\n115 \n \n“A number of reports have questioned the long-term sustainability of the Basic \nRetirement Pension, especially as our population is fast-ageing and BRP is fully funded \nout of government revenue…”  \nEt d’ajouter – \n“Government transfers are simply not sustainable if they are universal and open-ended. \nThis puts a limit on our capacity to do more for the poorer segment of the population. I \nbelieve that this is an issue that calls for a bold decision. I am therefore implementing, \nthis year, a targeted approach to basic pension as from October 24, the payment of BRP \nwill be limited to person with monthly income not exceeding Rs20000.” \nPourquoi, monsieur Pravind Jugnauth, alors ministre de Finances, avait-il introduit le ciblage \nen 2004 ? Parce que le système de la pension était ‘simply not sustainable’ ! Ces sont ses \npropres mots ; c’était en 2004.  Maintenant, on est en 2025, et cela devient tout à coup \nsustainable ? Pourquoi est-elle unsustainable ? \nPremièrement, parce que notre pension universelle est non contributive. C’est-à-dire \nque les bénéficiaires de la pension ne contribuent pas directement dans un fonds spécial de \npension pour payer leurs retraites. La pension est payée d’une Consolidated Fund, des \ndeniers publics. \nPar contre, les fonctionnaires, les employés des corps paraétatiques contribuent chaque \nmois une partie de leurs salaires dans le Civil Service Pension Scheme au Statutory Bodies \nPension Fund et arrivés à l’âge de la retraite, ils obtiennent une pension additionnelle, un \nlump sum, une pension à vie. \nDe même, les employés du secteur privé qui contribuaient jadis une partie de leurs \nsalaires dans le National Pension Funds ou qui aujourd’hui contribuent dans un fonds de \npension privée, eux aussi, arrivé à l’âge de 65 ans, ils ont une pension additionnelle parce \nqu’ils ont contribué pour cette pension. Et là j’aurais dû faire une parenthèse, Madame la \nprésidente. Les députés et ministres – nous aussi nous contribuons. Chaque mois nous \ncontribuons une somme d’argent qui va dans un fonds spécial et lorsqu’on prend notre \nretraite, après deux mandats, on nous paye à partir de ce fonds. Donc, c’est important de le \ndire parce que je vu des articles dans la presse qui suggéraient que les ministres et députés, \navant, avaient des pensions à vie, comme si c’était quelque chose de gratuit, un indemnity. \nUne pension qui est tombée du ciel. Non, on contribue ! Chaque mois on contribue dans ce \nfonds de pension.  \n\n116 \n \nDonc, ce n’est pas vrai de dire que, nous, les ministres et députés, nous avons une \npension additionnelle alors que les autres mauriciennes n’en ont pas. Non. On a une pension \ncontributive. C’est ça la différence ; ce n’est pas à titre gratuit. \nLa deuxième raison, Madame la présidente, pourquoi notre système de pension est \ninsoutenable ? C’est pour une raison démographique. On a une population vieillissante, an \nageing population, c’est-à-dire que le pourcentage de personnes qui ont 60 ans ou plus \naugmente, alors que le pourcentage de la population active, c’est-à-dire ceux qui travaillent, \ndiminue. Pourquoi ? Parce que l’espérance de vie augmente alors que le taux de natalité est \nen baisse. \nSi je me fie aux chiffres qui m’ont été donnés par le ministère de la Sécurité sociale, \nnous avons environ 279,800 seniors citizens, dont 83,750, soit environ 30 % ont entre 60 et \n64. Comme il y a plus de personnes qui touchent la pension et moins de personnes qui \ntravaillent, les travailleurs doivent travailler davantage et payer plus de taxes pour payer les \npensions. En d’autres mots, Madame la présidente, si rien n’est fait aujourd’hui, nos enfants \net nos petits-enfants auront à travailler plus et à payer plus d’impôts pour soutenir chaque \nretraité.  \nEn 2015, dans son rapport, la FMI faisait déjà allusion à notre population vieillissante \net disait, je cite – \n“This rapid increase could threaten the overall long-term sustainability of public \nfinances. These amounts would not be financeable with the current tax system.” \nOn ne peut pas être plus clair ! Tout notre système allait s’écrouler. C’est ce qu’avait \nprédit la FMI en 2015. Même l’ancien gouvernement, en 2016-2017, décide de mettre sur \npied un high-level commitee présidé par le ministre de la Sécurité sociale d’antan avec des \nreprésentants des ministères, de Business Mauritius et des syndicalistes pour revoir la \npension. Une des recommandations faites par le comité technique, c’est justement d’amener à \nterme l’âge de perception des bénéfices de la pension à 65 ans.  \nDonc, on n’est pas en train d’inventer quelque chose, Madame la présidente. Depuis \n2017, les experts dans le high-powered commitee, instauré sous le gouvernement MSM, \navaient déjà fait la recommandation qu’il fallait repousser l’âge de la pension à 65 ans. Mais \nle gouvernement d’alors refusa de publier le rapport et d’implémenter ses recommandations. \nLa situation s’empire. Enter monsieur Padayachy ! Quand il présente le budget 2020-\n2021, il fait le même constat. Je cite paragraphe 148 de son budget – \n\n117 \n \n“And our demographic trend with an ageing and decreasing population, as underlined \nby various international institutions, make our pension system unsustainable for the \nfuture.”  \nDonc, il reconnaît lui aussi, tout comme son leader reconnaît, que the pension system is \nunsustainable. Ça, c’est le langage qu’ils tiennent quand ils sont au gouvernement. Quand ils \nsont dans l’opposition, c’est complètement différent ! Mais ils reconnaissent que le système \nde pension est insoutenable. Pour remédier la situation, monsieur Padayachy abolit le \nNational Pensions Fund et le remplace par la Contribution Sociale Généralisée (CSG). \nComment décrit-il cette réforme ? – \n“We are introducing a contributory participating system, la Contribution Sociale \nGénéralisée.” \nÉcoutez bien – \n“This will ensure an additional guaranteed monthly income to citizens above normal \nretirement age of 65 years.” \nDonc, le but de l’introduction de la CSG était de remplacer le National Pension Fund \npar un system qui va garantir l’augmentation de la pension pour les retraités à partir de l’âge \nde 65 ans. C’était la seule raison et la seule explication donnée par monsieur Padayachy. \nJ’abolis le National Pension Fund et je le remplace par la CSG pour que vous, les retraités, à \nla retraite, vous ayez une pension additionnelle. \nMais que s’est-il passé après ? Où sont passés les milliards de roupies que les \ntravailleurs ont contribué aux sueurs de leurs fronts ? À une question parlementaire du 24 \noctobre 2023, monsieur Padayachy fait frissonner la population quand il lâche la bombe \nsuivante – \n« M. le président, le montant total déboursé pour le paiement de ces prestations est \nd'environ R 25 milliards. Il ne reste donc rien par rapport aux contributions de la CSG. \n»  \nIl ne reste rien ! C’est ce qu’on dit la kaiss vid ! C’est ça, monsieur le leader de \nl’opposition, quand on dit qu’il n’y a plus de caisse parce que la caisse est vide ! Et ce n’est \npas moi qui le dis ; c’est le propre ministre des Finances d’alors qui dit qu’il y a récolté R 25 \nmilliards des travailleurs ! Cet argent aurait dû être utilisé pour payer les pensions des \ntravailleurs ! Il reste zéro roupie ! \n\n118 \n \nMais pire que ça. En vérité, la situation est bien pire que ça, Madame la présidente. En \nréponse à une question parlementaire, notre honorable Premier ministre a déposé un \ndocument à l’Assemblée nationale. Quand on voit ce document, on trouve que le montant qui \na été dépensé est au fait bien au-delà de R 25 milliards.  \nIl y a un déficit de R 3 milliards l’année dernière et cette année R 7.7 milliards. En \ntotal, il y a un déficit de R 10.2 milliards dans le fond de la CSG. Non seulement ils ont tout \n‘bangolé,’ tout dépensé, mais en plus, on a dû payer R 10.2 milliards pour leurs dépenses. R \n10. 2 milliards sortent d’où ? C’est la dette publique, monsieur le leader de l’opposition ! \nVoilà comment on augmente la dette publique parce qu’on vient dire qu’il y a de l’argent \ndans la CSG quand en fait, il y a un trou de R 12 milliards, et il faut emprunter davantage ! \nEn vérité, Madame la présidente, la CSG a rendu le système de pension encore plus \nvulnérable, encore plus insoutenable, et en plus, les travailleurs du secteur privé n’auront plus \nde revenus additionnels à l’âge de la retraite auprès du NPF. C’est pourquoi, Madame la \nprésidente, l’honorable Premier ministre a annoncé, au paragraphe 240 de son discours, la \nconstitution d’une commission d’experts pour revoir notre système de pension et faire des \nrecommandations pour remplacer cette catastrophe CSG par une version améliorée du \nNational Pension Fund. Le Premier ministre présidera lui-même un steering committee pour \nconsidérer les recommandations de ce comité d’experts. \nMadame la présidente, nous avons aussi une pensée spéciale pour les plus vulnérables. \nNous les avons écoutés. Nous savons qu’il y a plusieurs personnes arrivées à l’âge de 60 ans \nqui ne peuvent plus travailler. Nous savons qu’il y a des personnes qui ne peuvent plus \ntravailler pour des raisons physiques. C’est pourquoi le Premier ministre a annoncé un peu \nplus tôt, cet après-midi, la mise sur pied de deux comités – \n(1) \nLe premier, dont il présidera lui-même, considérera la possibilité de soutenir \nfinancièrement les personnes qui ne peuvent plus travailler au-delà de l’âge de 60 \nans, de même que les femmes au foyer et les mères de famille. \n(2) \nLe deuxième comité sera présidé par mon collègue ministre de l’Intégration \nsociale et considérera la possibilité d’étendre un soutien financier à ceux qui, pour \ndes raisons médicales, ne peuvent pas ou ne peuvent plus travailler. \nAvec ces deux comités, nous espérons apporter un soutien financier aux personnes les plus \nvulnérables qui ont atteint l’âge de 60 et qui ne travaillent pas ou ne travailleront plus. \n\n119 \n \nMadame la présidente, je n’ai pas parlé sur les mesures budgétaires pour ministère, car \nj’ai voulu rompre avec la pratique de mon prédécesseur qui profitait du Finance Bill pour \namender en catimini les prévisions ayant trait aux droits des travailleurs et aux relations \nindustrielles. C’est pourquoi, monsieur le leader de l’opposition, ce budget ne fait aucune \nmention de semaine de 40 heures.  \nNous allons tenir les Assises du travail au cours de cette année, probablement pendant \nle mois de septembre. Tous les acteurs et les opérateurs du secteur, les syndicaux, le patronat \net les forces vives seront invités à se pencher sur les diverses mesures annoncées dans notre \nprogramme électoral et reprises dans notre programme gouvernemental. A la lumière de ces \ndélibérations, nous viendrons avec un nouveau projet de loi. \nMadame la présidente, je m’excuse, j’ai été un peu long, un peu parfois technique mais \nil était nécessaire de bien expliquer à la population pourquoi on s’est retrouvé dans \nl’obligation de repousser l’âge de la pension de manière progressive jusqu’à l’âge de la \nretraite de 65 ans. Nous n’avons pas d’autres choix. Nous n’avions plus le luxe de pouvoir \nemprunter davantage. Nous avons choisi de ne pas augmenter la TVA et de maintenir les \ndépenses essentielles et ce n’est pas de gaieté de cœur que nous le faisons mais c’est par \npatriotisme. \nNous devions à tout prix nous assurer que Moody’s ne nous relègue pas au statut de \njunk et à lire le communiqué de Moody’s en date du 10 juin, il semblerait qu’on ait atteint \nnotre objectif. Avec ce budget courageux responsable, nous jetons les bases pour une avenir \nmeilleur. Merci. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nYes, hon. Minister of Agriculture! Minister, please start. \n(Interruptions) \n(6.15 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Agro-industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries (Dr. \nA. Boolell): Madam Speaker, the joy I am having to speak after my good friend, there is not \nmuch left for me to say – but the joy having to address the House on a major Bill, the Budget \nSpeech, does not need to convince anyone of the merits of this Bill. The Prime Minister, \nMinister of Finance has dared to act and has acted in the best interest of the nation. \n\n120 \n \nThis Budget Speech delivered by the Prime Minister is a speech where there is honesty \nof purpose. It is true that there is a state of psychosis, engineered by those who steadfastly do \nnot want to understand the harsh realities and we do not live in caucus land, Madam Speaker. \nWho do not like to take populist measures? But the fact remains, pension reform as is, is \ninevitable and sustainability is the policy of any responsible government. \nPension reform is making headlines every day and the statement which has been \ncirculated made by Prime Minister is crystal clear that BRP is fiscally unsustainable and \nfinancially unbearable. It is a timebomb ticking and is crowding out resources which should \nhave been channelled to reconcile social and economic factors. As a responsible government \nwith a clear mandate, we have to serve the better interest of the weak, the vulnerable, the \nsocially and physically deprived and the nation at large. And those who can work, have the \nopportunities and legitimate right to work till they reach 65 years of age. \nA nation, Madam Speaker, does not walk on empty belly, on dreams which shall be \nshattered. Either we adapt or we perish. Do we want, as has been stated and reinforced by the \nPrime Minister and hon. Uteem, a sub-investment country grade? A sub-investment country \ngrade status, Madam Speaker, means junk status and in one word – loss of confidence. As the \nPrime Minister has stated – there is a call not only for the Prime Minister but for the nation to \nrebuild the bridge to the future. All economists, actuaries, entrepreneurs and many mere \nmortals are not born with silver spoons. They totally agree with the reform and people are, \nslowly but surely, beginning to understand the merits of the reform. Only those who were \nfanatics of reckless populism, will wage a sinister campaign and no decision is taken lightly \nby a responsible government to serve the interests of a nation and a nation which constantly \nhas to be on the walk and we will walk the talk, Madam Speaker because we have to live up \nto the expectations of our children. We have to live up to the expectations of the regional \ncommunity, of the international community and as we say “arise, awake, stop not till the goal \nis reached”. The country as I see, is walking on a tightrope to rebalance growth with the \ncollection of taxes. No one owes us a living and the days of preference are waning. \nMadam Speaker, from the rank and file, be from the backbench or frontbench, we put \nup a common front and are present in all forum – on radio talk-show – in our constituencies \nand with the private sector to state emphatically, there is no alternative. Pension reform is \nsine qua non. The Deputy Prime Minister chaired several meetings attended by Ministers, \nJunior Minister of Finance, the FS and senior officers from relevant bodies examine in-depth \nwhat may be contentious issues. \n\n121 \n \nWe have a clear mandate to repair our public finances and economy, if not, we will be \nin financial dire straits. The Prime Minister has pledged and I know he will honour his pledge \nbecause he has the support of the government and sooner than later, the nation will rally \nbehind what he has said and it is a pledge that states in around three years’ time, everyone \nwill share in the benefits including a return to a lighter tax policy.  \nTaxation, Madam Speaker, is based on income. Minimum wage is and will remain \nRs20,000 monthly and will increase. The most fortunate will support the more vulnerable and \nit will be a fair contribution from those corporation and individuals over the next three years. \nOur deep-seated concern is first and foremost our sovereign rating and those who have \ncommitted economic crimes should not get away. Moody’s credit ratings agency downgraded \nMauritius from Ba1 in 2014 to Baa3 in 2024 during the prime ministership of Pravind \nJugnauth. \nAs we say, a notch above the junk status but Pravind Jugnauth should have had the guts \nto explain why the debt to GDP ratio rose from 55.8 % in 2014 to 90% in 2024. As Prime \nMinister, he and his Minister of Finance, they withdrew Rs180 billion from the vault of the \nBank of Mauritius. Rs80 billion was credited to MIC and its investment were a high-risk in \nmany cases. Maradiva hit the jackpot, hundred billion was transferred to consolidated fund \nbut there has been no judicious use of resources. It is the Molnupiravir and the NG syndrome \nall the way. \nThe nation was shocked and stunned in relation to reply given by Prime Minister to PQ \nB/39 put by hon. Jhummun. Its corruption galore by NNC and cronyism at its peak. They \nshould not get away. And economic crime is a crime and the policy of the MSM was spend, \nspend and squander taxpayers’ money. If there is no money, it was acceptable to them to print \nmoney, Madam Speaker. We saw the effects printing of money had on inflation and the \npurchasing power of household. As economics say: ‘inflation is first and foremost a tax on \nthe poor, on a tax on the middle class and then the rest’. \nMadam Speaker, the Bank of Mauritius has an obligation to recover the giveaway loan \nto the cronies. Why did Pravind Jugnauth and his Minister of Finance set aside the findings of \nthe report of the World Bank? Yes, it hit them in the face over mismanagement of the \neconomy. The major reform of pensions should have taken place as far back as 2018. We are \ntoday in an unprecedented situation and can the Alliance Lepep deny that it promised to \nreform pensions? The former Prime Minister is now denying it; unless he was planning to \n\n122 \n \nprint more money as he did before. When you look at macroeconomic figures which have \nbeen quoted and cited lengthily by hon. Uteem, it is equivalent to a burden of Rs500,000. \nYes, half a million of debt borne by every Mauritian out there.  \nAnd what should we do? Like Oliver Twist, beg for more and more? Of course, asking \nfor loans from elsewhere. There is no alternative but to redress, and if we do not fix it today, \nwe may not have anything to fix tomorrow. The system will be broken. And may I remind \nyou of the old pensioners in Greece, who overnight had to take a 50% reduction on all \npension benefits? We cannot take free education, healthcare, free transport and social-related \nbenefits for granted. Our duty is to bequeath a legacy of sustainability to our children and the \nfuture generation. The former regime went on a spending spree and guess who are paying for \nthe largesse of the big spenders? The taxpayers, Madam Speaker.  \nWe cannot live on borrowed money and borrowed time. The MSM has brought this \ncountry to its abyss. The pension funds of CEB, Air Mauritius have been dilapidated by the \ndecadent filthy regime. SIT, Rose Belle Sugar Estate have been vandalised and ripped off. \nThe Competition Commission under the MSM encouraged cartel; the cartel of wholesale and \ndistribution of food and pharmaceutical products fleece consumers. It was a clear case of \nstate capture; running the country for the benefit of a lucky few and their cronies. \nThere is no free lunch. We are mobilising financial resources to invest in productive \nsectors in order to create more opportunities for everyone. Investment, investment and sound \ninvestment. And we need to reclaim our ranking as the best platform for business in the \nregion and beyond. Export or die reform should be deep-rooted as Government embarks upon \nreform. Prior to 05 June, the property sector has been subject to grandfathering of its \napproved project, that is, the same fiscal regime from the time permits were issued. Investors \nand corporate sectors have to go for creation of shared values. Universal pension or basic \nretirement pension is not free, as has been stated by the Prime Minister. It is not manna \nfalling from heaven. It is funded by taxpayers’ money and sustained by sound investment \npolicies. The Prime Minister is saving the BRP and as I stated, from the abyss.  \nAnother oil shock, Madam Speaker. Another oil price shock due to uncertainty in the \nMiddle East would lead to higher inflation, higher prices in the petrol pumps and in shops, \nand less likelihood of interest cuts. For a government focused on growth and improving \nliving standards, the economic consequences are profound. This budget addresses the interest \nof the weak and the vulnerable. We are pro-poor; the welfare state is sacrosanct. As a caring \n\n123 \n \nGovernment, we have to protect the sacrosanctity of the welfare state. Free transport for \nstudents and senior citizens is here to stay. 81% as has been stated, of income earners under \nour Government, are exempted from taxes but high-income earners and corporates are being \ncalled to contribute during this period of distress. This is the most courageous and \nprogressive tax reform this country has undertaken for years. With an ageing population, we \nneed more of our workers who are able to work and to remain in the labour force. Our \npopulation has peaked; our domestic workforce is shrinking. We can maintain the status quo \nand face a bleak future, but we will maintain the dynamism that has seen us emerge from a \npoor overcrowded barracoon at independence, to one of the richest nations on the African \ncontinent. We are committed to a low tax jurisdiction in less than three years. \nI am not going to state what the Prime Minister has stated in relation to the two \ncommittees that have been set up specifically to decide on income support for deserving \nhousewives and those whose health do not allow them to work. As we say, everything got \ndowngraded. We should not forget that US and France have not been spared. The US has lost \na notch over its credit ratings by Moody’s. Washington is not able to limit its rising debt level \nand let me quote here what was said on Bloomberg by Jamie Dimon, a long serving Chief \nExecutive of investment of JPMorgan – \n“Hopefully, we [the US] will avoid a recession, but I would not take it off the table at \nthis point. The scale of the increase in tariffs will lead to higher inflation and global \ngrowth will fall.” \nMauritius is now not only a Small Island State, but it is now a Big Oceanic Small State \n(BOSS), and it clearly implies Mauritius will lose its investment grade status that will lead to \ninvestors losing confidence in our capacity to repay our debt if we maintain status quo as I \nhave stated earlier. Mauritius would have to borrow at high rates. There will be flight of \ncapital, and the financial services as has been stated, would be a sunset sector. Who will write \noff our external debt? It has happened to Argentina and Sri Lanka; we call it the worst \nmiddle-income trap.  \nIncreasing the basic pension from Rs10,000 to Rs15,000 from 2022 to 2025 has costed \naround Rs18 billion yearly. The Contribution Sociale Généralisée in 2025, is expected to \namount to Rs16 billion and we clearly see that there is an upcoming shortfall of Rs2 billion. \nAnd it is expected that the contributions to Contribution Sociale Généralisée are expected to \ncontinue to increase, unless we decide to cut back and we have agreed to cut back. As is, \n\n124 \n \nMadam Speaker, it is a curse. Cumulative savings from Contribution Sociale Généralisée, the \nraising pension age and from other fiscal measures will be used to lower our current budget \nand debt deficit.  \nIn France, back in 2023, a law was passed to raise the retirement age to 64. Seychelles, \nBotswana, the UK have all raised the eligibility age of BRP to 65 years. Not to forget that \nDenmark is keen to raise the age to 70 years, which will be the highest in Europe. I agree, we \nare not Denmark but Mauritius cannot be the exception to the rule, with an ageing workforce \nlikely to reach 27% of our total population in 2063. The demographic changes are \nfrightening. We used to be an overcrowded barracoon but we no longer are. We need labour \nand there is not a country in the world which is not reviewing its pension scheme. \nMadam Speaker, this demonstrates that this is a responsible budget for our great \ncountry which is now a fully-fledged Ocean State. We have to tap into the potential of our \nEEZ. Today, following the historic Chagos deal with the UK and the US, 2.3 square \nkilometres of the economic zone is now ocean-based. We need to accelerate the \ntransformation of the opportunities lying in our EEZ. The UN Secretary General was right to \nsay, oceans cannot be the Wild West, and President Macron made it clear that the ocean is \nnot for sale. The Prime Minister has pledged to declare the biggest MPA in the Chagos \nArchipelago.  \nAs a responsible Government, we need to ensure that we create an enabling \nenvironment that allows to ensure food security objectives, create opportunities for our \nfarmers and fishermen but also, contribute to the global cause of saving the planet from the \nglobal warming and climate change. One can ask how we will achieve such ambitious goal in \nthese trying times. The answer will come, again, from our natural assets and from our oceans \nthrough the carbon and biodiversity credit. Seychelles has started to exploit the extended \ncontinental shelf which we share with them. They are fishing sea cucumbers and exporting to \nChina. \nMadam Speaker, Saya de Malha remains a big carbon sink, even bigger than the \nAmazon, and it is within swimming distance to Agalega which has a good runway and a sea \nport. We need to set up a proper cold storage there to keep the fish before exporting them to \nMauritius. Rs25 million have been earmarked as an early harvest.  \n\n125 \n \nThe historical agreement over the Chagos Archipelago gives us the leverage to set up a \nfuture fund to invest in food security, renewable energy, climate change adaptation and \nmitigation, the blue economy, AI equity funds, and equity funds for our young people to \nbecome entrepreneur. The country will rise with the tide to become a high-income State. This \nstrategy will strengthen economic resilience. It will create opportunities for investment for \nthe private sector and further diversify the operation. Most importantly, it will help us to \ndeliver food security and job opportunities for our population. This is a virtuous circle which \nwe have to unleash and we can unleash together. \nAs a vast Ocean State, with an EEZ of more than 2 million square kilometres, we do \nnot need to conclude bilateral agreement with the UK to fish in our EEZ. More pelagic fish \nand tuna would be landed indeed, and as the saying goes, it is as good as gold. We will \ndeliver more licences to fishing vessels but, it will be a pre-requisite that the catch will land \nin our port. \nMadam Speaker, be it artisanal or semi-industrial or industrial, they have to be \nempowered. Our fishermen are being encouraged to regroup and facilities will be extended to \nthose who want to have the catch on the banks. All the fish aggregating devices which are \ndamaged will be replaced. We are making it possible for them to acquire semi-industrial \nvessels at concessionary rates. Lagoon fishermen are being trained to move off lagoon.  \nFirst and foremost, we are focused on empowering the fishermen, those who have \nreached 65 years old will have the option to retire against a compensation of Rs200,000. \nGrants and loans are provided to fishers to purchase more robust boats, known as canot, for \noff lagoon fishing to increase the catch. The democratisation process is ongoing, \nnotwithstanding, responsible fisheries activities. \nSemi-industrial fishing companies are co-existing with Raphaël Fishing at St. Brandon \nfor mutual benefit, and the National Coast Guard are playing their role fully. In this context, I \nwill appeal to the foretaste and taste of our fellow citizens, we all like to eat fish and if we \nwant to increase our fish consumption, our aquaculture deserves better consideration. Brazil \nis a huge coastal State and 49% of its fish production is from aquaculture. I ate Tilapia in \nBrazil; it is tasty and fleshy. Why are we reluctant to eat fish like Red Berry or Tilapia or \nBarramundi? The critical mass can easily be created to make prices competitive if the \ndemand for supply from aquaculture and, especially from bank fishing is created. Today, be it \n\n126 \n \nbank fishing or be it St. Brandon or Chagos, these areas which are part of our EEZ are \nteeming with fish and opportunities are knocking. \nMadam Speaker, research and experts on inland aquaculture will tell us when fish is \ntransferred to brackish water prior to consumption. The taste is amazing! I want the price of \nfish to be available and to be affordable by one and all. Don’t we export Barramundi to \nSwitzerland? An expression of interest to manage barachois has been called. It is a pledge to \ninculcate to the younger generation a healthy dietary habit for the old ones to fade away.  \nMadam Speaker, it is true to say that fish are dying of old age on the banks. So, let us \nhave responsible catch from aquaculture on land, in the lagoons, in the banks and beyond \nborders of our national jurisdiction. I have been told the High Seas Treaty has been ratified. \nThe blue economy and port development will be the powerhouse of emerging sectors. \nThe Nagoya Protocol has been domesticated and widened the opportunities for exploitation \nand exploration of vast resources of biological diversity on land and in the sea beyond our \njurisdiction.  \nThe opportunities in the blue economy are as vast as the oceans. Madam Speaker, a \nscientific officer from Albion Fisheries Research Centre has identified specific coral sponge \nfrom which extraction of substance has been identified to treat diabetes.  \nDuring our first mandate, there will be a fisheries port and an auction market. A study \nwas conducted in relation to the implementation of fish auction market. It will be done and it \nbe done diligently. In 2013, we prepared a fully-fledged report on land-based oceanic \nindustry and on the potential of the fisheries sector. The more attractive the port, the bigger \nthe bunkering services and the services of a new dry dock. \nThe port and bunkering activities, Madam Speaker – we need to tap into opportunities \nprovided by servicing a share of the 35,000 ships that transit through our waters and region \nevery year. It is a boost to our shipping services industry and domestic economic activities \nthrough interlinkages. Bunkering, both conventional and through green fuels, provides \nimmense opportunities, and we need to ensure we do not fall behind the curve when it comes \nto logistics, including green logistics.  \n\n127 \n \nAs countries push to reduce carbon footprints, including those embedded in maritime \ntrade, green logistics will become an important component, and we need to ensure we stand \nready to lead in the region. Needless to say, ensuring our port regains its competitiveness and \nthis is sine qua non for proposed strategy to deliver it. It is unacceptable that we have dropped \n369 out of 405 ports in the world, and we need to regain our edge. \nMadam Speaker, I have highlighted the relevance and importance of our EEZ, and I \nhave said that there are opportunities knocking, and it is up to us to grasp the opportunities \nbut, we have to do so in line and be responsive to what we call good environmental norms \nand standards.  \nThis Budget is programme-based, but we have to err on the side of caution, and we \ncannot take things for granted. I have in mind our export of tuna to the US and if there is an \nincrease of tariff by more than 10%, it may mean that we will lose our market. and we have \nto ensure that diplomatic relations are at their very best. We have to see to it when it comes to \nour export of sugar and tuna to US, we have to see to it that the market is there and remains to \nbe captured. Let us hope that things will all go well in the light of changes unfolding on the \ninternational scene. \nIn 2023, our food bill hit a staggering Rs61 billion while agriculture export reached \nonly 34 billion. It is good to remind ourselves and I appeal to one and all: we need to eat what \nwe produce and produce what we eat. We have to see to it that in relation to incentives being \ngiven by Government, we have to make the most of it. Whether we like it or not, one of the \nmajor constraints, an impediment to the agricultural sector, remains our workforce. There is a \nshortage of labour, and we have to import labour to widen the circle of opportunities for those \nin the agricultural sector.  \nAs of now, all the inputs in the agricultural sector have gone up. We are appealing to \nfarmers and we are seeing to it that there is regrouping. Regrouping means reduction in cost \nin relation to economies of scale. We appeal to one and all to make the most of the facilities \nbeing extended to them.  \nIn the sugarcane sector, never before has a ton of sugar been increased by Rs5,000 per \nton. It has been done to empower the small planters. We know what the constraints are, I have \nhighlighted them. We are seeing to it that these constraints are being addressed in a very \nforceful and meaningful manner. \n\n128 \n \nMadam Speaker, agricultural sector remains a sector which has to become green, \neffective and environmentally friendly. We are putting emphasis on agriculture under shade \nhouse – sheltered agriculture. The reason being to impress upon the young to make the most \nof opportunities which are looting. It is true that the cost of input can be expensive, but we \nare facilitating their access to these inputs. I don’t have to highlight the measures announced \nin the budget in respect of consolidating the agricultural sector. For example, in the sugarcane \nindustry, to empower small planters, more than Rs344 m. had been earmarked.  \nSo, let us, Madam Speaker, conclude on a positive note and say we have travelled a \nlong way. There are opportunities and there are strengths, but we have also to face an uphill \nbattle. There are threats, but we are not afraid to ward off those threats as long as there is \nhonesty of purpose. The Budget Speech delivered by the hon. Prime Minister is a budget \nwhere there is honesty of purpose.  \nWe have travelled a long way and there are miles to go. Our people will understand that \nnothing is easy and there is no free lunch. We have good citizens totally involved in socio-\neconomic development of our country. We have to rally towards the truth, and justice will \nprevail.  \nMay God bless our great little country which is becoming a big Oceanic Small State. \nThank you very much. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nHon. Minister Assirvaden, please! Now is your time to talk! \n(6.48 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities (Mr P. Assirvaden): Madame la \nprésidente, je vous remercie de me donner l’occasion de m’adresser à la Chambre à \nl’occasion de la présentation de ce budget par le Premier ministre. \nPermettez-moi, Madame la présidente, de déplorer l’absence du leader de l’opposition, \nà qui j’avais demandé, très gentiment, au cours de son discours, de rester pour pouvoir \nécouter ce que j’ai à dire concernant les choses qu’il a reprochées à mon ministère, à ce \nbudget, à la nation et à l’Alliance du Changement. Malheureusement, la population sera \ntémoin que le leader de l’opposition n’est pas là pour écouter ce que nous avons à dire \naujourd’hui. \n\n129 \n \nMadam Speaker: Même si vous êtes un beau parleur !  \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members : Aaah ! \nMadam Speaker: Dans beau parleur, il y a ‘parleur,’ mais il y a aussi ‘beau.’ \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members: Hmmm ! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Assirvaden: Merci, Madame la présidente ! Merci pour le compliment. Cela me \ntouche !  \nMadame la présidente, j’ai entendu le leader de l’opposition dire que “I need your \nprotection, Madam Speaker.” Le peuple n’a pas la courte mémoire. Ce qui est malheureux, \nmalheureusement, Madame la présidente, celui qui était la juste avant vous, n’était pas \nquelqu’un qui protégeait l’opposition. C’était quelqu’un qui harcelait l’opposition ! C’était \nquelqu’un qui bombardait l’opposition ! C’était quelqu’un qui nous expulsait séance après \nséance et qui ne nous protégeait jamais !  \nAn hon. Member : C’est vrai ! \nMr Assirvaden: Heureusement que lui, le leader de l’opposition, a de la chance d’avoir \nquelqu’un pour le protéger !  \nJ’ai remarqué que le leader de l’opposition reproche ou se permet de dire que le Junior \nMinister, M. Damry, a les faveurs du Premier ministre et que le Premier ministre a délégué \nses responsabilités au Junior Minister, qui est un élu du peuple. Moi, je dirais que c’est mieux \nque le Premier ministre délègue ses responsabilités à un Junior Minister à l’encontre de \nl’ancien Premier ministre qui déléguait ses pouvoirs à Dounk ! Je préfère cela !  \nCeci dit, Madame la présidente, je répondrai un peu plus tard à ce que le leader de \nl’opposition voulait dire. Il faut bien le dire : j’étais étonné de la présence de l’ancien Premier \nministre à une conférence de presse, il y a quelques jours, pour venir commenter sur le \nbudget, alors qu’il était assis à côté de l’ancien ministre des Finances, M. Padayachy. \nComment se fait-il, Madame la présidente ? Celui qui a dirigé le pays une décennie, dix ans, a \ndérivé notre histoire économique, peut aujourd’hui venir se poser en donneur de leçons ?  \n\n130 \n \nPravind Jugnauth a été le Premier ministre de ce pays avec le MSM pendant plus ou \nmoins dix ans, de 2014 à ce jour. J’étais membre de l’opposition ; je m’étais assis juste à côté, \nici. Aujourd’hui, il faut bien le dire, puisque Pravind Jugnauth a commenté le budget ; il a \nperdu toute légitimité morale pour commenter l’état actuel de nos finances. Comme dirait le \nleader de l’opposition, – enfin, je ne connais pas trop le langage – dinite nay ba ? \nAn hon. Member: Nay ba! \nMr Assirvaden : À l’heure où nous nous efforçons de restaurer la confiance… \nMadam Speaker : En général, on dit pani nay ba ! \nMr Assirvaden: Pani nay ba! Dinite nay ba, ça se dit ? \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Nay ba! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Assirvaden:  Sharam nay ba!  \nÀ l’heure où nous nous efforçons de restaurer la confiance avec le budget du Premier \nministre, il est essentiel, Madame la présidente, de rappeler les épisodes les plus graves : les \nmauvaises gestions, les conflits d’intérêts, le favoritisme et l’opacité qui ont manqué le \nmandat de l’ancien Premier ministre du MSM.  \nIl faut bien que la population comprenne une chose. L’actuel Premier ministre bâtit son \nbudget sur l’avenir basé sur un bilan laissé par l’ancien gouvernement MSM. Prenons \nquelques exemples, quelques minutes de cette Assemblée nationale, pour énumérer ce que \nl’ancien gouvernement MSM a laissé à la population de ce pays pour qu’aujourd’hui, nous \nsommes obligés de toucher à certains acquis.  \nCommençons par la Silver Bank. R 3.5 milliards de fonds publics ont été investis par le \nMSM dans la Silver Bank. Aujourd’hui, sous administration et objet d’une enquête de la \nFinancial Crime Commission ! Dans la Silver Bank, la NIC a investi R 150 millions. L’argent \nde la population ; ce peuple qui m’écoute. La NIC General Insurance a investi R 125 \nmillions ; l’argent du peuple ! \n\n131 \n \nLa mairie de Curepipe – R 87 millions. The Sugar Insurance Fund Board – R 40 \nmillion. MHC, Mauritius Housing Corporation – R 100 millions. La mairie de Port-Louis – R \n45 millions. \nLa caisse n’est pas vide ? Cela n’est pas dilapidé l’argent de la population ? The \nMauritius Investment Corporation, MIC, présidée par la Banque de Maurice – juste avant les \nélections générales, à peine quelques mois avant les élections générales – et étroitement \ncontrôlée politiquement, a accordé un prêt de R 1.65 milliards à Maradiva, proche des \nJugnauth ! C’est l’argent de la population ! Aujourd’hui, l’ancien Premier ministre, l’ancien \nministre de Finances, le leader de l’opposition viennent nous mettre tout sur le dos alors \nqu’ils ont dilapidé ce pays et cela, avec des conflits d’intérêts.  \nCe n’est pas fini ! Quelques temps de cela, sous le regard complaisant des autorités, \nl’ex MPCB, c’est une banque – aujourd’hui fusionnée à la MauBank, a accordé des prêts à la \nhauteur de R 1.5 milliards à l’homme d’affaires, Rakesh Gooljaury alias Judas ! Tout cet \nargent, donné à Judas et, aujourd’hui c’est la population qui souffre ; aujourd’hui la \npopulation de ce pays souffre et aujourd’hui, le leader de l’opposition et l’ancien Premier \nministre viennent nous dire que c’est nous qui n’avons pas de cœur. Des prêts à haut risque \naccordés sans garantie dont le remboursement reste douteux, une connivence d’affaires sous \nsilence politique du MSM.  \nLa population a oublié le fameux contrat ventilators COVID 19 – Pack & Blister ! R \n77.9 millions pour des équipements défectueux, en mars 2020. La population a oublié BO-\nDigital, R 308 millions pour des masques et des caméras thermiques. Une autre société, R \n308 millions de l’argent de la population. Et, aujourd’hui, Pravind Jugnauth vient de dire que \nnous n’avons pas de cœur, nous reprenons les acquis de la population !  \nOù est-ce que nous allons trouver de l’argent si tout est dévalisé ? \nLe contrat de Molnupiravir, sortant de R 7.90 à R 79 millions !  R 79 millions, \ndévalisées sous notre nez pendant que la population mauricienne souffrait. On était refermé \nchez nous ; on ne sortait pas. On ne voyait pas nos voisins ; on ne voyait pas la famille. On \nn’allait pas dans les funérailles, on n’allait pas dans des mariages. On était assis à \nl’Assemblée nationale, loin de l’autre. Entre-temps, le MSM, maja karo !  \nJ’ai entendu, l’honorable Uteem, avec raison, lire, j’étais au Parlement ce jour-là. Vous \nsavez, la population doit comprendre. Si aujourd’hui nous sommes obligés de faire ce que \nnous faisons, ce n’est pas de gaité de cœur. Personne n’est content d’être impopulaire. \n\n132 \n \nPersonne ne prend le plaisir à faire souffrir les autres mais, l’ancien ministre de Finances avec \nla complicité de Pravind Jugnauth, a dévalisé ce fonds de CSG.  Je relis pour la population \nqui m’écoute ce soir, Madame la présidente, ce que le ministre vient de dire en anglais. Le \nministre dit ceci le 24 octobre 2023, à l’Assemblée nationale en parlant du CSG, ce plan de \npension, le montant total déboursé pour le paiement de ces prestations est environ R 25 \nmilliards. Il le dit le 24 octobre 2023.  \nDonc, rien par rapport aux contributions de la CSG. Tout l’argent récolté est utilisé – la \nCSG est vide ! Nous sommes au pouvoir depuis novembre 2024, 6 ou 7 mois, la CSG est \nvide, pas un sou. Et, aujourd’hui, on vient de nous accuser. Et, ce qui est malheureux de le \ndire, ce n’est pas dans mes habitudes d’attaquer les syndicalistes. Il y a un syndicaliste qui \navait applaudi – un, qui avait applaudi quand tout le monde, tous les actuaires, tous les \nmembres de l’opposition pointaient du doigt disant que ce CSG allait finir à la faillite, lui, il \ndisait oui que c’était bon. Et, aujourd’hui, c’est lui l’un des plus bruyants, pour vous dire. \nMais, Madame la présidente, avant de rentrer dans le vif du sujet, permettez-moi de \npréciser certaines choses, ici à l’Assemblée nationale. Il n’y a pas mal de personnes qui m’ont \nappelé, dans ma circonscription et ailleurs, quand ils ont écouté le leader de l’opposition. \nC’est pour cette raison que je me suis permis, Madame la présidente, de soulever un point de \ndroit pour dire que j’ai pris le leader de l’opposition en flagrant délit de mentir. Je tiens à \npréciser que la catégorie 110A au CEB qui concerne des foyers inscrits au registre social pour \npayer l’électricité, est une catégorie sociale bien définie – une catégorie sociale très bas. Elle \nest toujours subventionnée ; elle le reste et elle continuera à l’être. Cela concerne 170 800 \nabonnés/foyers que le leader de l’opposition a mis en panique. \n Il est inacceptable que le leader de l’opposition prenne des libertés aussi flagrantes. \nLorsqu’il affirme avec assurance, vous l’avez vu, comme s’il disait la vérité, que dans le \nbudget 2025-2026 présenté par le Premier ministre, prévoit la suppression de subvention sur \nl’électricité. C’est faux ! C’est faux ! Ce soir, j’ai demandé au responsable du CEB de faire \npublier un communiqué pour démentir le leader de l’opposition parce que c’est faux.  \nIl ment comme il respire. J’allais dire l’omelette et dizef, sa zafer la la ! Quant aux \nsubventions liées à l’eau, là encore, le leader de l’opposition, Madame la présidente, fait \npreuve d’une malhonnêteté intellectuelle inquiétante. Il cherche à intoxiquer l’opinion \npublique en prétendant que les aides seraient supprimées. C’est faux ! Honteux ! \n\n133 \n \nLe nombre de consommateurs de la CWA bénéficiant d’une exonération des frais d’eau \nest de 80 630. Vous réalisez, il essaye de mettre dans la tête des gens, 81 000 familles, pour \ndire que nous allons supprimer les subventions sur l’eau. \nDonc, Madame la présidente, pour vous dire que, malheureusement, il n’y a pas que ces \nquelques chiffres et quelques scandales que j’ai cités. Le leader de l’opposition m’a parlé de \nla baisse d’électricité. C’est vrai. Pendant la campagne électorale, en pensant que ce que nous \navons entendu sur le CEB, on s’est dit qu’il y avait la possibilité de faire baisser mais quand \nj’ai pris le règne du CEB et du ministère, vous réalisez que le CEB a, aujourd’hui, un déficit \nde R 4.8 milliards. Milliards ! \nLe CEB roule sur des overdratfs de R 7.5 milliards, vous réalisez. Qui est responsable \nde ce trou, pour dire des choses ? \nAn hon Member: Joe! \nMr Assirvaden: C’est son trou, pas à moi ! C’est le trou de l’ancien ministre, c’est un \nfait. C’est le trou laissé par l’ancien ministre qui était là. Ce n’est pas fini. Quand on vient au \nCEB – la CWA, vous réalisez dans quelles conditions nous avons dues conjuguer pour faire \nce budget ! La CWA, j’ai archi parlé ici.  R 700 millions dévalisées sous l’ère de Lesjongard, \nPrakash Maunthrooa. R 700 millions, vous vous réalisez, sans un contrôle. \nEt, le leader de l’opposition à l’audace, malheureusement il n’est pas là. Alors qu’il \nétait ministre, la responsabilité ministérielle était à combien, Monsieur Lesjongard ? \nL’honorable Lesjongard ! Force est de constater que ce dernier n’exerçait aucun contrôle \neffectif sur le fonctionnement du directeur général d’alors. Le directeur général d’alors \nrépondait à Lakwizin au Prime Minister’s Office.  \nLe résultat aujourd’hui est accablant. Une institution, aujourd’hui, au bord de \nl’asphyxie financière. On est des menteurs ? Loin de la ! Nous parlons des chiffres. C’est un \nfait que nous avons aujourd’hui des pertes de R 700 millions.  \nCe n’est pas fini, Madame la présidente. Wastewater Management Authority qui tombe \nsous ma responsabilité. R 443 millions de déficits. Comment gérer ? Vous quittez un pays \nrempli d’argent, vous quittez un pays avec une caisse remplie. R 443 millions pour \nWastewater Management Authority ? \nCe n’est pas fini, l’honorable ministre Uteem vient de le dire, MIC : R 60 milliards \ndans l’opacité la plus totale. Et l’ancien Premier ministre vient dire :  le pire budget ? Le pire \n\n134 \n \nbudget du siècle alors qu’il y avait un holdup au grand jour par l’ancien gouvernement sur ce \nMIC.  \nVous réalisez ? Posez-vous des questions. Que la population se pose des questions, dans \nquel état est notre pays aujourd’hui après 10 ans du MSM. Dans quel état est le pays \naujourd’hui pour que le Premier ministre, le ministre des Finances est obligé de puiser dans \nles fonds de pension pour pouvoir faire rouler ce pays et ce n’est pas fini. Avez-vous oublié \nles R 45 millions à Pulse Analytics pour les sondages à la veille des élections générales \ndonnant gagnant au MSM ? C’est l’argent de la population ; l’argent de la MIC.  \nVous réalisez, Madame la présidente ? Je suis inquiet parce qu’au fil des pages je ne \nvois que ça, State Investment Trust (SIT), l’argent des petits planteurs, des planteurs, R 1.6 \nmilliards de déficits. Qui a géré ce fonds ? Qui a géré le SIT pendant des années ? Pas les \nmembres du parti Travailliste, pas les membres du MMM, non ! Ce sont les gens du MSM. \nVous réalisez ? Et le leader de l’opposition représentant du MSM à l’Assemblée nationale \nvient questionner l’honorable ministre Sik Yuen pour la baisse des produits pétroliers, R 30 \nmilliards à Mercantile & Maritime Group dans l’opacité la plus totale. Fermant les yeux \nencore sur les R 30 milliards avancées par la SIT à des copains et copines pour \nl’approvisionnement en carburant dans des conditions qui restent opaques. \nL’honorable Premier ministre, dans son budget, essaye de faire redémarrer les fonds de \npension. L’honorable leader de l’opposition était ministre du CEB il y a quelque temps.  \nVous savez les fonds de pension du CEB, des travailleurs du CEB, the CEB Staff \nPension Fund et du CEB Manual Workers Pension Fund, ces deux fonds de pension ont un \ndéficit R 5,7 milliards ! Si rien n’est fait, je l’ai dit en 2023 ou 2024 avant les élections \ngénérales, si rien n’est fait, les travailleurs du CEB, ceux qui ont trimé pendant des années \npour faire allumer ce pays n’auront plus de pension si rien n’est fait dans ces pensions. Vous \nvoyez ? \nAn hon. Member: Nou pou dan marenwar. \nMr Assirvaden: C’est la même chose qui se passe ici, Madame la présidente. Ce n’est \npas fini, les fonds de pension d’Air Mauritius, c’est la même chose : R 5,5 milliards. Ces \nfonds de pension vont collapse dans quelques temps si rien n’est fait. Pour vous dire donc, \nces fonds accusent des déficits de R 5.5 milliards, Madame la présidente.  \nVoilà que nous avertissements pendant des années ont été ignorés par le MSM et \naujourd’hui, c’est la population qui paye les pots cassés. En quelques mots, voilà le contexte \n\n135 \n \ndans lequel nous sommes obligés de présenter ce budget. Un contexte où nous avons les \nmains, les pieds liés à ce que le gouvernement MSM nous a légué. Et aujourd’hui, les \nbourreaux d’hier veulent se présenter en sauveur : ‘Quand je reviendrais Premier ministre, je \nvais rétablir la pension à 60 ans’. Eh ! Kan mem ? Al kont to valiz kass d’abord. \nMadame la présidente, face à de telles dérives nous avons été contraints de repenser nos \npriorités, de revoir nos plans pour le pays par devoir de responsabilité patriotique, ce n’est \npas de gaieté de cœur. C’est vrai que c’est difficile de demander à la population de faire des \nsacrifices, nous sommes obligés de reformer aujourd’hui pas pour nous, pas pour notre \ngénération, comme j’ai dit à quelqu’un ce matin, pour les ti zenfan de nos ti zenfan demain \nnous sommes obligés de le faire. Voilà dans quel contexte, en quelques mots, nous sommes \nobligés de présenter ce budget. \nMadame la présidente, l’heure va si vite. Le secteur que j’ai hérité, l’énergie, \nmalheureusement encore une fois je déplore l’absence de l’ancien ministre. Un secteur \naffaibli par des années d’immobilisme, plombé par l’absence de décision courageuse, c’est le \nrésultat d’une gouvernance déficiente portée par ministre, par l’ancien Premier ministre qui \nont négligé les avertissements.  \nLe 17 mai 2022, j’étais encore dans l’opposition assis juste là en face du bulldozer, \nj’avais demandé une question à l’ancien ministre sur la demande en pointes réelles pour \nl’électricité. Vous savez ce qu’a été sa réponse ? Il me répondait ce jour-là – \n“I can again assure the House that with regard to that reserve capacity margin, the \nCentral Electricity Board is operating above the threshold value, with -5 [percent] for \nthe coming 10 years.” – en 2022. \nAujourd’hui, je l’ai dit et je le répète, nos infrastructures énergétiques sont au bord de la \nrupture. La situation est critique où nous avons en février de cette année a atteint un peak \nrecord de consommation de 567,9 MW maximum. À Fort George plusieurs moteurs du CEB \nsont tombés en panne depuis le début de l’année mettant en péril notre capacité à répondre à \nla demande nationale et c’est sûr que plusieurs députés ont eu des calls de leurs mandants \npour dire que l’électricité à couper à certaines heures. Ce n’est pas un cas isolé, c’est le \nsymptôme d’un système laissé à l’abandon, d’un pilotage à vue qui nous a conduit \naujourd’hui au bord de la pénurie. \nL’honorable leader de l’opposition me demandait pourquoi je n’ai pas augmenté \nélectricité, moi vous dire, Madame la présidente, avec votre permission quel bilan il a quitté. \n\n136 \n \nLe leader de l’opposition, l’ex ministre des Finances avec la complicité de Pravind Jugnauth \na quitté au CEB des moteurs vieux de 37ans ! À Fort George, les cinq moteurs de service sont \nentre 33 ans et 35 ans, à Nicolay les turbines à gaz sont de 30-35 ans.  \nÀ Fort Victoria des moteurs de service de 15 ans à 36 ans, qu’ont-t-ils fait pendant 10 \nans lui et l’ancien ministre Collendavelloo ? Qu’ont-t-ils fait lui et l’ancien ministre \nCollendavelloo pendant 10 ans pour renouveler ces moteurs ? Rien ! Il est important de noter \nque ces turbines à gaz devraient servir uniquement en cas d’urgence en heures de pointe.  \nCe n’est pas le cas aujourd’hui, et ce n’est pas fini. Je ne le dis pas de gaieté de cœur \npour contredire l’ancien ministre, les moteurs Independent Power Producers (IPP) 25 ans \nTerra, 27 ans Alteo, CTDS 20 ans, Savanna 20 ans. Il nous faut d’abord penser à la sécurité \nénergétique. Il nous faut penser, on a pris le gouvernement depuis 6-7 mois à l’agenda, au top \nde notre agenda c’est d’abord la sécurité énergétique. Madame la présidente, c’est bien que la \npopulation le sache, nous avons dû à un certain moment demander aux hôtels de se mettre on \nstandby pour pouvoir répondre à la demande mais qu’a fait l’ancien gouvernement ?  \nIl m’a posé la question, qu’est-ce que j’ai à proposer. Je viendrai dans quelques temps \npour dire ce que j’ai à proposer. L’énergie renouvelable, je l’ai dit l’ancien ministre, c’est le \nseul ministre de l’énergie du monde à être le ministre de zéro mégawatt – dans le monde \nentier. C’est le seul ministre de l’énergie au monde qui a eu le ministre de zéro mégawatt. \nL’ancien Premier ministre a été à la COP26 pour dire que nous allons atteindre les 60 % \nd’énergies renouvelables en 2030. En 2014 nous perdons le pouvoir. Le Parti travailliste perd \nle pouvoir en 2014. L’énergie renouvelable est à 23.6 %. L’énergie renouvelable avec le \nconcept Maurice île Durable du Professeur de Rosnay et de mon ami, Osman Mahomed. \nAujourd’hui nous sommes moins de 17.6 % ; nous avons régressé sous l’ancien ministre \nCollendavelloo et sous l’ancien ministre hon. Lesjongard. Vous réalisez, Madame la \nprésidente ? Et pourtant, ce constat est préoccupant. Il ne s’agit pas d’un débat technique, \nnon, loin de là, ni d’un simple chiffre technique, il y va de notre dépendance énergétique et \naussi de notre devoir envers les générations futures dans cette lutte contre le changement \nclimatique. \nMais je peux dire aujourd’hui à la Chambre, après six à sept mois au sein du ministère \noù nous avons eu des réflexions, nous avons travaillé, nous avons eu des sessions de travail \nsous la direction du Premier ministre, du Deputy Prime Minister, nous allons tout faire pour \n\n137 \n \nmaintenir ce chiffre de 60% d’énergie renouvelable dans notre mix énergétique. Nous allons \nle faire – cela prendra du temps mais nous allons le faire. \nMadame la présidente, à partir de maintenant qu’est-ce que nous faisons ? Le budget a \nfait provision de R30 milliards. J’ai entendu le leader de l’opposition parlait de R30 milliards \npour faire quoi ? Et lui qui avait fièrement brandi un road map énergétique sous son mandat \navec un Fast Track Committee présidé par l’ancien ministre, chargé de projets totalisant R59 \nmilliards et il a laissé ce secteur en friche et le cas de Corexsolar est éloquent. Ce que j’avais \nprévu à dire, je préfère ne pas le dire puisqu’il n’est pas là. Je l’attendrai, tôt ou tard je \nl’aurais. Pour vous dire ce que nous comptons faire ? \nMadame la présidente, je crois qu’il me reste une dizaine de minutes ou moins. \nMadam Speaker: Allez-y, je vous arrêterai. \nMr Assirvaden: Notre feuille de route à nous, Madame la présidente. \nLa MARENA présentera sous peu qui est sous ministère, un nouveau plan stratégie de \nl’énergie renouvelable – the Renewable Energy Strategic Plan conçu à partir d’une vision \npartagée entre les secteurs concernés. On a travaillé dessus pendant les six derniers mois. \nNous nous sommes engagés à garder les 60% d’énergie renouvelables dans notre production \nénergétique. Cela prendra du temps, c’est sûr, un peu plus de temps que prévu mais nous \nsommes condamnés à y arriver. Ce budget prévoit la création au sein de la MARENA d’un \nRenewable Technology Centre ainsi qu’un Renewable Portal Virtual qui viendront s’ajouter \nà la mise en place d’un ‘one stop shop ’. Ces dispositifs permettront de lever les obstacles au \ndéveloppement de produits d’énergie renouvelable.  \nCe budget, il avait dit qu’il ne voyait rien dans le budget. Dommage, il n’est pas là.  Le \nbudget prévoit également le recrutement de personnel qualifié et la formation continue du \nstaff de la MARENA pour lui donner les moyens d’accomplir pleinement sa mission. \nMadame la présidente, un nouveau système de tarifs préférentiels pour la vente \nd’électricité sera bientôt introduit. Il sera harmonisé avec les Time of Use pour la \nconsommation en commençant bientôt par les gros consommateurs déjà munis de compteurs \nintelligents. Pour le secteur non-électrique, la MARENA travaillera l’introduction d’un \nbiocarburant et la mobilité verte fondée sur l’énergie renouvelable.  \nDes campagnes de sensibilisation seront menées à l’échelle nationale y comprit \nRodrigues. À Rodrigues le projet île verte se poursuivra avec l 'extension de la ferme Solar de \n\n138 \n \nGrenade et l’ajout d’un mégawatt de batteries à Pointe Monnier. Nous avons pris la décision, \nune forte décision de lancer de nouveaux projets réalisables dans un cadre financier et légal \nrenouvelé afin de garantir les initiatives plus bankable, comme on dit dans le jargon, \ncohérentes et pleinement alignées avec notre politique énergétique à long terme. \nDans le National Biomass Framework, nous avons accéléré cette transition vers une \nsortie progressive du charbon. Nous allons accélérer cette transition, notamment à travers \nl’utilisation de copeaux de bois, des wooden chips comme source d’énergie. Les techniciens \nont été en Namibie, en Afrique du Sud, au Mozambique pour voir comment cela se fait. \nCertains producteurs indépendants quelque Terra, Alteo, Omnicane sont déjà bien avancés \ndans ce domaine, brûlent déjà ces wooden chips et nous avons activement encouragé \nl’ensemble des IPP dans les nouveaux contrats que nous allons signer dans quelques mois \ndont nous négocions actuellement les termes à s’inscrire dans cette dynamique comme \nsubstitue au charbon. \nNous allons aussi de l’avant avec un Floating PV avec batterie. Nous avons la ferme \nintention d’aller de l’avant avec ce projet de panneaux photovoltaïques flottants d’une \ncapacité de 15 MW avec batterie. Ce projet sera lancé à Tamarind Falls, propriété du CEB. \nNous lançons aussi, Madame la présidente, dans quelques semaines, ce qu’on appelle \nle ‘agri solaire’. Le ‘agri solaire’, c’est un mixte entre l’agriculture et les photovoltaïques. \nNous comptons augmenter la capacité de ces projets sortant de 500 kW à 4 MW par projet \npour une dizaine de projets de ‘agri solaire’. Les photovoltaïques avec batterie, concernant \nces projets, nous comptons également augmenter leur capacité dans les semaines à venir ou \nles mois. En un mois, les appels d’offres vont sortir pour augmenter la capacité de dix projets \nde 10 MW chacun. Donc, un projet total de 100 MW d’énergie renouvelable ; les appels \nd’offres vont sortir dans quelque temps. \nNous avons aussi pris la décision, Madame la présidente, de procéder à une \nmodernisation des dispositions de panneaux solaires domestiques. Ceux qui m’écoutent \nsûrement, ont des panneaux solaires sur leurs maisons. Nous allons permettre à ces \npersonnes, aussi d’acquérir des batteries, pour qu’en terme de pointe, les après-midis, le soir \nen termes de 6h30 – 7h00, ils n’ont pas besoin d’acheter l’électricité du CEB, ils peuvent se \nconnecter leur batterie pour leur autonomie énergétique. \nNous lançons aussi dans quelques semaines à Plaines des Roches, là où il y a déjà 9 \nturbines de 9 MW à Plaines des Roches, des appels d’offres pour une ferme éolienne de 15 \n\n139 \n \nMW à 20 MW qui va sortir de quelque temps. Donc, Madame la présidente, ceci dit la \nsécurité énergétique reste notre priorité des priorités. Il nous faut d’ici janvier 2026 – sept \nmois, huit mois – 100 MW sur nos lignes. Nous sommes obligés d’avoir 100 MW dans nos \nlignes parce que nous avons de records de 565-566 MW. \nC’est pourquoi il faut agir vite. C’est pour cette raison que nous avons eu plusieurs \nréunions sous le chairmanship du Deputy Prime Minister. C’est pour cette raison que nous \navons discuté longuement avec le CEB, avec le ministère, avec les techniciens, avec la \nMARENA, avec IMO pour arriver à un consensus qu’il nous faut inévitablement entre 100 \nMW et 110 MW d’ici janvier 2026. \nC’est dans cette optique que nous avons décidé de lancer un appel à manifestation \nd’intérêt qui sort d’ici vendredi pour un projet de barge électrique, the Powership afin de \nrenforcer notre réseau national. J’ai entendu le leader de l’opposition parler de barge. Il a \nl’audace de critiquer le projet de barge, quelle ironie, Madame. En 2023, il était ministre, \nsous son propre mandat, un request for information avait été lancé par le CEB pour étudier ce \nprojet. Si l’ancien ministre et l’ancien Premier ministre avait fait ce projet deux ans de cela. \nS’ils avaient eu le courage de le faire et d’aller jusqu’au bout à l’époque, nous ne serions pas \naujourd’hui dans une situation énergétique aussi tendue qu’elle est aujourd’hui. \nC’est pour cette raison que nous sommes obligés d’ajouter 100 MW supplémentaires \nmais notre action ne s’arrête pas là. Nous avons également engagé d’autres réflexions, sur \nd’autres alternatives, Madame la présidente. \nFace aux défis énergétiques, notre stratégie sera sur plusieurs axes, l’efficience \nénergétique, IMO, la mégawatt et moi je l’appelle, les mégawatts non-utilisés, c’est l’énergie \nrenouvelable qui n’a pas été utilisée dans cette optique justement que mon ministère a déjà \nintroduit des nouvelles régulations concernant, exigeant que seuls les appareils \nélectroménagers enregistrés et conformes aux normes d’efficacité énergétique soient \ndorénavant autorisés à l’importation. \nIl s’agit d’une mesure concrète qui vise à réduire la consommation électrique des \nménages et à encourager les cultures de sobriété énergétique. Dans les semaines à venir, \nd’autres appareils électroménagers seront visés par des normes d’efficacité énergétique.   \nVoilà, Madame la présidente, en ce qui concerne ce secteur énergétique que l’ancien \ngouvernement nous a laissé et le cahier de charges que j’ai défini.  \n\n140 \n \nEn ce qui concerne l’eau, je ne dirai que quelques mots. C’est encore pire. 62% de \npertes sur nos réseaux. Plus de R 1.7 milliards volatilisés dans la nature, avec les pipes \nreplacement programmes. Pour vous dire, Madame la présidente, l’ancien leader de \nl’opposition, l’honorable Dr. Arvin Boolell avait posé des questions sur les R 700 millions. Et \ntout le monde connait la réponse de l’ancien ministre. \nDepuis que j’ai accédé aux responsabilités de ce ministère, j’ai hérité d’un secteur \ndésorganisé avec des réservoirs à sec dans un contexte de pression accrue sur notre réseau \nhydrique. Vous vous rappelez décembre 2024, janvier 2025, ce que nous avons subi. Gérer \nune telle situation sans dispositif adéquat de stockage, c’est comme attendre d’éteindre un \nincendie sans citerne. Ce constat, Madame la présidente, est dur à faire. Ceci-dit, le rapport \nsur le réservoir de Cluny est prêt. Le board de la CWA étudie ce rapport et les rapporteurs ont \nrecommandé que ce rapport soit soumis à la Financial Crimes Commission pour ceux \nresponsable de la CWA et du contracteur. \nDonc, Madame la présidente, je vais terminer en vous citant six points marshals du \nsystème de loi à Maurice. Nous allons commencer avec le premier, Madame la présidente, \navec le remplacement des tuyaux grâce à une enveloppe financière de R 2,6 milliards. Ces \ntravaux seront menés avec rigueur et transparence. Il s’agira de 115 km de tuyaux qui seront \nchangés dans le pays. Dorénavant, Madame la présidente, tous les services réservoirs, la \nconstruction des mini réservoirs à travers le pays, seront en acier de technologie australienne. \nFini ces réservoirs type Cluny, qui aujourd’hui, à peine 15 mois, a des fissures.  \nNous avons commencé depuis décembre de cette année-ci des forages. 65 000 m3 d’eau \nadditionnels ont été intégrés à notre réseau pour renforcer notre réseau pour pouvoir répondre \nà la demande. Le projet de forage a été optimisé pour permettre à plus de 65 000 – comme je \nviens de le dire – m3 par jour, de rentrer dans nos réservoirs. Des forages ont été réalisés et \nmis en service dans des régions comme Fond du Sac, Bois Mangue et d’autres régions seront \nconcernées. \nCinquième, Madame la présidente, nous avons aussi pris la décision des Containerised \nPressure Filter Plants. Des containers pour pomper l’eau, traiter l’eau et la mettre sur notre \nréseau, qui permettent à récupérer l’eau douce avant qu’elle ne se perde en mer. Beaucoup de \npersonnes nous disent ‘be delo pe al dan la mer, pe al dan kanal partou. Personn pa dir \nnanye’. Nous avons pris la décision d’emmener ces Containerised Pressure Filter (CPF) \nPlants pour pomper de l’eau sur le réservoir ou sur notre réseau pour pouvoir alimenter l’eau \n\n141 \n \ntraitée, bien sûr. Nous avons également mis en place, au sein de la CWA, un département \nentièrement dédié aux camions citernes afin d’assurer une distribution plus efficace aux \npopulations les plus affectées. \nSeptième, dessalement. Nous envisageons également de manière sérieuse de voir, avec \nle Conseil des ministres et les techniciens, le projet d’une station de dessalement. \nParallèlement, nous avons déjà commencé à encourager les hôtels, surtout, à investir dans ce \ntype d’infrastructures. \nMadame la présidente, dernière petite chose… \nAn hon. Member: Rivière des Anguilles Dam! \nMr Assirvaden: J’y arrive ! Enfin, ce projet de barrage de Rivière des Anguilles Dam. \nLe leader de l’opposition aurait pu ne rien dire dessus. Il a choisi de commenter. Que les \nchoses soient claires. Pendant 10 ans, le MSM et ses deux anciens ministres n’ont absolument \nrien fait sur le projet de Rivière des Anguilles Dam. \n(Interruptions) \nAbsolument rien ! Et ce projet, aujourd’hui, je peux le dire à l’Assemblée nationale, la \nconstruction de ce projet va commencer au plus tard février de l’année prochaine. Ce projet \nva commencer ! Nous allons pouvoir bénéficier du projet de Rivière des Anguilles Dam à \npartir de 2029. Il l’a bien dit, il le sait ! Enfin, sa pik li osi koumadir. Il l’a dit, vous allez \ncouper le ruban vous. Oui, bien sûr nou pou koup riban parce que c’est nous qui allons \nfinaliser ce projet. Donc, nous allons le faire. \n(Interruptions) \nDonc, Madame la présidente, nous sommes obligés de réussir. Je termine sur une note \npositive, comme poursuit ce que mon ami le ministre, Dr. Boolell, vient de dire. Nous \nsommes obligés de réussir. Nous sommes condamnés à faire ce pays sortir la tête de l’eau. \nPas pour nous, pas pour ceux qui sont là. L’avenir appartient aux petits enfants de nos \nenfants.  \nJe suis convaincu qu’avec ce gouvernement, avec le Premier ministre, avec le Deputy \nPrime Minister, avec l’équipe que nous avons, yes we can. Nous allons réussir! \nMerci, Madame la présidente ! \nMadam Speaker: I suspend the Sitting for one hour. \n\n142 \n \nAt 7.29 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 8.33 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated! \nHon. Minister for Youth and Sports! \nThe Minister of Youth and Sports (Mr D. Nagalingum): Madame la présidente, \npermettez-moi de commencer par une courte histoire. Il était une fois un pays au bord du \nprécipice. Son économie était en ruine, ses institutions affaiblies et son peuple sans espoir. Un \ngroupe de personnes honnêtes, dévouées, qui avaient une vision pour leur pays a alors pris les \nchoses en main pour tirer la nation de ce grand malheur. Ils auraient troussé leurs manches, \npris des décisions difficiles et douloureuses pour faire ce travail de réparation. Alors que le \npays commençait à se rétablir, ceux qui avaient creusé le trou, les anciens dirigeants \nresponsables de la ruine ont commencé à crier ‘zot pe met nou dan trou’. Quelle ironie, \nMadame la présidente ! \nMadam Speaker, let me therefore begin by commending the hon. Prime Minister for his \nbold stunt and courageous measures in this year’s budget. Under his leadership, assisted by \nhis Deputy Prime Minister, his Cabinet and elected Members of this ruling alliance, the \nhealing process has started. The medicine may at time not be pleasant, but it usually heals. At \na time of global economy turbulence, local structural deficiencies and rising social \nexpectation threaten our collective stability, the Prime Minister has once again shown the grit \nof a leader who choses responsibility over popularity and foresight over convenience.  \nFrom the very moment he assumed office, the hon. Prime Minister made it clear, he \nwas fully aware of the disastrous economic situation facing the country. But instead of \npassing the burden to someone else, instead of hiding behind others, he chose to shoulder it \nhimself. He took the difficult path – the path of the bold and the courageous. And yes, \nsometimes, unpopular measures because that is what leadership demands. This is the \nhallmark of a true leader. One who leads by example, not from the sidelines. While others \nlook for comfort, he chose responsibility. In time of ease, anyone can claim to lead. But in \nmoment of crisis, only real leaders stand firm. Our Prime Minister is one of the determined \nspirits today.  \nMadam Speaker, as I said, the Prime Minister was well aware of the storm ahead. \nRather than exposing his colleagues to the political heat of difficult position, he chose to \n\n143 \n \ncarry the burden himself. That is not abandonment; that is leadership. It is easy to steal the \nspotlight during times of celebration. It is entirely something else to absorb criticisms for the \nsake of your team and your nation.  \nEn comparaison à ce que le pays a assisté durant les dix dernières années douloureuses, \nalors que toute la population luttait pour échapper à l’emprise de la crise de la Covid-19, \nluttant pour sa santé, ses moyens de subsistance et sa survie, une poignée de personnes pour \nleurs appétits voraces, aux dépens de la nation, sous couvert de comité de haut rang, censé \nprotéger et de guider le pays, les décisions étaient prises, non pas en fonction des intérêts du \npeuple, mais en fonction des intérêts financiers et de leurs propres postes.  \nIl ne s’agit pas de leadership, mais de pillage. Ce qui s’est passé n’était rien de moins \nqu’un exemple de la situation d’Ali Baba et de ses quarante voleurs où la souffrance publique \nest devenue une occasion d’enrichissement personnel. L’histoire ne l’oubliera pas, et le \npeuple non plus. Zot finn rampli zot poss lor soufrans lepep. \nMadame la présidente, c’est tout un clan de mafiosi qui a pillé les finances de l’État, \nqui a envahi nos institutions et kokin dans les caisses, sans honte, sans vergogne, sans pitié. \nCes gens-là se sont comportés comme des voleurs de grands chemins. Dans certains cas, ils \nont même emporté les tiroirs. Des études officielles sont venues prouver l’étendue de la \ncatastrophe qu’ils ont laissée en héritage au peuple mauricien. Aujourd’hui, Madame la \nprésidente, ces mêmes gens-là ont le toupet de sortir leur tête de ce trou d’où le peuple les \navait enfouis pour essayer comme des vampires et de se refaire une santé. Qu’ils sachent que \nl’épée de la justice est toujours suspendue sur leurs têtes. \nMadam Speaker, this budget is not a populist one. It is a corrective budget. One that \naim first to repair the gap and damage of the past, and only then lay down the foundation for \nfuture growth. It is a roadmap for recovery, not a gift basket. The Prime Minister has been \nclear: the real benefit, the relief and the opportunities will begin to ease in over the next three \nyears. But to reach that point, we must first make the necessary sacrifices today.  \nThis is not a budget of empty promises. It addresses real, structural challenges that have \nbeen ignored for too long. Innovation, new incentive and funding for R&D, digitalisation and \ntechnology driven sectors to shift us from a consumption-led to a production-led economy. \nLabour market reforms, target training programmes, reskilling initiatives and work permit \npolicies aim at both empowering local and meeting real sectorial demands. Ageing \npopulation, reforms in healthcare, pensions and community support system to ensure dignity. \n\n144 \n \nCare and social cohesion as our demographic shift. These are the bold measures that we have \ndecided to adopt to steer Mauritius’ economy direction. \nNow, let me come to the issues that are of upmost importance in my portfolio for youth \nand sports. I have repeatedly stated that I will not go back on my words. When I assumed \noffice, I was faced with an abysmal situation. Wherever I turned, whichever sector I \naddressed, major issues were waiting. It was not just inefficiency; it was systemic decay. \nWhat struck me most were the rampant abuse of government and public assets. The assets \nmeant to serve our youth and local communities were being diverted for private use, often \nwith the complicity of certain public officers. This was not negligence. It was a betrayal of \npublic trust. \nMadam Speaker, there has been day light robbery, pillage de fonds publics. Carrément \ndu vol! MSM is used with a kitchen-cabinet, giving orders. So, in the Ministry of Youth and \nSports, there was also a lakwizinn from where orders were being issued. Private dinners and \neven birthday parties were celebrated in Pointe Jérôme. I was told that some people – you \nknow who – treated Pointe Jérôme as their primary resident. I have already ordered a full and \nindependent investigation by the Office of the Public Sector Governance. Let me be clear: the \nmore we dig, the more we are uncovering. This is only the beginning. I will not hesitate to \ntake the necessary and decisive action. \nWe owe it to the people, especially to the youth, to clear up the system and ensure that \npublic resources serve the public goods, not private interests. We are working hand in hand \nwith residents of different regions of the country, breaking down stigmas and creating a new \nsense of ownership and hope. With the commitment and determination that define our action, \nwe will confront drug addiction and its proliferation head-on and we will succeed. Madam \nSpeaker.  \nMadam Speaker, there is a growing sense of disconnection between the youth of \nMauritius and the Ministry of Youth and Sports fuelled by perceptions of outdated \nprogrammes, limited engagement and a lack of meaningful opportunities for participation and \nexpression. Many young people feel that their voices are not being heard and that initiatives \noften fail to reflect their real needs, aspiration and evolving lifestyles. This disconnect has led \nto apathy, reduced involvement in public youth initiative and a widening gap between policy \nand reality. Rebuilding trust and relevance required the Ministry to adopt a more inclusive, \ninnovative and a youth-driven approach rooted in dialogue and co-creation. \n\n145 \n \nMadam Speaker, in the field of sports, we note that there is a form of mafia-like \ncontrol, manifesting through fictitious clubs and questionable federations. These entities are \noften created solely to access public funding, manipulate elections and secure influence, \nrather than to genuinely promote sport or support athletes. I also noted that the Ministry \nsuffers from the absence of a clear, coherent and a long-term action plan for both youth \ndevelopment and sports. There is no strategic direction. Initiatives taken are often \nfragmented, reactive and disconnected from the real challenges faced by young people and \nathletes.  \nAs regard, infrastructure, both for youth and sports, the landscape is alarming. Many \nfacilities are in a state of neglect, undermaintained as far below international standards. If \nurgent action is not taken, the country may soon face the embarrassment of having to host its \ninternational football matches on foreign soil. The state of abandonment is mind-blowing, \nreflecting years of poor planning, lack of investment and absence of a maintenance culture. \nThese are only some of the problems which I have highlighted; there are many more.  \nMadam Speaker, let me elaborate on some of the measures that have been included in \nthis Budget. The establishment of seven sport academies under the aegis of the Mauritius \nMultisports Infrastructure Ltd – it is undeniable that progress of sport and access to \ncontinental and global elite levels require the creation of centres of excellence in various \nsport disciplines. It is with this in mind that the Ministry supported a project, approved by the \nMinistry of Finance within the framework of this fiscal year.  \nAmong the discipline involved is football whose national academy will replace the \nLiverpool International Academy. We have taken the time necessary to clear, explain and the \ndirection we are taking post Liverpool International Academy. We have held press \nconference, engaged with stakeholders and brought in world-renowned football expert, Mr \nFrançois Blaquart, to guide us.  \nParents and staff have been reassured. As far as we are concerned, our vision is crystal-\nclear. For those who refuse to see the daylight, I can only express regret. We are moving \nahead with the establishment of seven academies under the MMIL with the ground work for \nthe remaining six, soon to begin. The National Football academy is already operational. It’s \nnow a matter of fine tuning. The head coach educator will arrive shortly with the recruitment \nprocess already on the way.  \n\n146 \n \nWe are putting in place a solid transparent structure to ensure that no minister or \nincoming federation’s president can interfere and derail the project. We’ve witnessed this too \nmany times before, most notably with the CNFF and I am determined not to allow history to \nrepeat itself, \nMadam Speaker, in the context of the 2025-2026 fiscal year, an allocation of Rs134 \nmillion is planned for the renovation of several sport infrastructures including Stade George \nV, Anjalay Coopen Stadium and others. The goal is to obtain a FIFA certification for Stade \nGeorge V and Anjalay Coopen. Additionally, an amount of Rs40 million will be made \navailable to the Mauritius Multisports Infrastructure Ltd for the maintenance and \nmodernisation of these infrastructures.  \nAn envelope of Rs46 million is planned for athletes’ assistance through the allowance \nto high level athletes, programmes and a trust fund for excellence in sports. For retired \nathletes, an amount of Rs5 million is planned to cover the monthly pension for each athlete. \nAssistance to federation amount to Rs60 million while football club has received aid of \nRs15.4 million for this fiscal year. An amount of Rs6 million is planned over two fiscal years \nfor a feasibility study on the construction of a rally circuit. This project, dear to many \nenthusiasts of sports, is beginning to take shape and will soon become a reality. The Ministry \nis already tackling this task. This project will offer motorsport enthusiasts the opportunity to \npractice the discipline safely and with all the requirement amenities.  \nAt last, we will put an end to the tragic stories of unfortunate accidents across the \ncountry where young people, simply trying to practice their sports with passion and hope, \nhave found themselves injured due to unsafe, inadequate or non-existent facilities.  \nAn amount of Rs50 million is planned to cover the participation of our athletes in \nvarious regional, continental and even global games. These games include the CJSOI games, \nthe COSAFA Club as well as preparation for the Francophonie games.  \nProvisions have been made for the organisation of the National Sport Awards which, \nunfortunately, did not take place last year due to lack of funds. A new development to note – \nthe introduction of the National School Sport Award which is part of the logic of reviving \ninter-college competition. An amount of Rs146 million is planned for the Mauritius Sports \nCouncil to cover its activities including the maintenance of MUGA.  \nMadam Speaker, we are laying the foundation of a new sporting era in Mauritius where \nthe key initiatives are as follows – \n\n147 \n \n• \nA new Mauritius Sport Promotion Division will drive grassroot participation \nunder inclusive banner, Sport pour tou dimoune;  \n• \nThe revival of the jeux inter-collèges will foster a sporting culture in school, \nidentify talents and promote physical fitness and health. Preliminaries for the \npresent edition began in April.  The Finals will be held from 14 to 18 July at Cote \nd’Or and other national venues.; \n• \nA residential sports camp will be launched for young athletes including those \nwith disabilities, focusing on performance wellness and social bounding.  \n• \nThe Combat Art Festival indoor and sport games and kids in action initiative \ntargeting 8 t0 13 years old in schools will further broaden participation and \nawareness. \n• \nA high-performance sport programme is being launched with sights set firmly on \nthe Los Angeles 2028 Olympic and Paralympic games. Major international events \nwill be hosted to position Mauritius as a premier sporting destination.  \n• \nOur high-performance centre at Côte d'Or continues to serve 131 elite athletes \nincluding 15 para-athletes with cutting edge training, sports, science and recovery \nservices. \nMadam Speaker, I would also like to elaborate on some of the non-financial measures \nthat we are busy putting into place. These measures are successfully implemented will have \nlasting impact on the youth and sport landscape in the country. The new Sports Act is already \nat the drafting stage and will soon be introduced into the National Assembly. I want to assure \nthe House that we are not merely amending old laws; we are laying the foundation for a \nmodern forward-looking legislative framework that will address long stand structural \nproblems in our sports ecosystem.  \nOne of the most damaging issues we intend to tackle head on is the proliferation of \nfictitious clubs and federations. This is not just about laws; it is about restoring trust, ensuring \nfairness and empowering our youth through sports. Mauritius is home not only to those who \nlive on the island but also to a vibrant and talented diaspora scattered across the globe. Many \nof these individuals whether born abroad to Mauritian parents or having migrated at a young \nage possess exceptional athletic talent, world class training and invaluable experience from \ncompeting in high performance environment.  \n\n148 \n \nIt is time we formally open the door to these athletes through a clear, transparent and \nfair naturalisation and eligibility framework to represent our national colours on the \ninternational stage.  \nThis is not just a sporting decision, it is a statement of national unity, it is an \nacknowledgement of being Mauritian. It is not defined solely by geography but by identity, \nheritage and heart. By integrating diaspora athlete into our national teams, we aim to –  \n1. strengthen the performance capacity of our teams with proven experienced \nathletes.  \n2. Create a powerful link between Mauritius and its global diaspora.  \n3. Foster knowledge transfer as these athletes can help mentor and raise the level \nof local talent, and above all  \n4. showcase to the world a Mauritius that is global, ambitious and proud.  \nA clear policy and selection criteria will ensure that this process maintains integrity, \nmeritocracy and fairness and that it works in synergy with our local athlete development \neffect. In embracing our diaspora, we are not replacing we are reinforcing, we are not \nimposing success, we are reclaiming it. Mauritius belongs to all Mauritians wherever they \nmay be. \nThe policy is not about privilege, it is about equity, recognition and long-term vision. \nMauritius must reward excellence not just on the podium but also in life beyond the gain. Our \nathletes have carried the flag with honour, it is now our turn as a nation to honour them with \nopportunity, dignity and a future. Under the renewed vision of the Ministry of Sports, the \nMauritius Sports Council and affiliated entities are being repositioned to play more strategic \nand complementary roles in a nation’s sports ecosystem. The MSC will focus on development \nof coordination of community sports and infrastructure management while the trust for \nexcellence in sports will drive elite athlete develop high performance programme.  \nThe national Côte D’Or complex will operate as a centre of excellence for training, \nevents and sports science. The Commission Nationale du Sport Féminin will strengthen effort \nto promote, empower women in sports and the National Council for Sports in school and \nuniversities will spearhead the integration of sport into the education system nurturing talents \nfrom an early age and fostering a culture of physical activity and excellence across academic \ninstitutions. \n\n149 \n \nMadam Speaker, before I conclude, let me highlight some of our recent achievements \nin the field of sports. These milestones are not just events they are powerful indicators of the \nfresh mindset now driving our sports community, free from unnecessary constraints and \ninterferences, of our athletes, coaches, federation are built to thrive. They are performing with \nrenewed confidence, pride and purpose and the results speak for themselves. This is the spirit \nwe are nurturing, a dynamic liberated sporting environment where excellence is not only \nencouraged but made possible. At the WAKO African Continental Kickboxing \nChampionships in South Africa in December 2024, our junior won three golds and two \nsilvers while our seniors dominated with seven golds, four silvers and one bronze. \nIn February 2025, our national badminton team secured two silver and two bronze \nmedals at ALL African Badminton Championship in Cameroon. Our para-athletes shone \nbrightly on the global stage winning five gold and five silver in Saudia and three gold, eight \nsilver and two bronze in Dubai and the World Para Athletics Grand Prix. These victories \nreflect not only personal commitment but also national investment in inclusion and \nexcellence. I will also like to highlight the outstanding achievement of two of our athletes \nwho have brought immense pride to Mauritius.  \nFirstly, Kimberley Le Court Pienaar recently made history as the first Mauritian Cyclist \nand the first African female rider to win the prestigious UCI Women World Road Race Tour \ncalendar. Secondly, Jérémie Lararaudeuse has emerged as Africa top 110 metres hurdles \nhaving broken the national record twice last week in France. Madam Speaker, this budget has \nmade a genuine attempt to lay the foundation of a better future through a bold set of measures \naimed at correcting the failing of the past. I must express a serious concern in the wake of \nsome things through controversial reform.  \nCertain deadwood has attempted to resurface, yes, ban lera MSM have tried to creep \nback into relevance but no matter how loud they shout, how desperately they try, history has \nalready named them for what they are devaliz partou. They have plundered this nation so \nshamelessly that they ought to be embarrassed to even show their face in public. The scale of \nlooting was staggering that I found myself tempted to turn to the hon. Prime Minister or the \nhon. Attorney General and ask if there are no law that allow us to recover what they have \nstolen from the people and if such a law does not exist perhaps it is time we consider enacting \none. The people deserve justice not promises. \n\n150 \n \nMadam Speaker, I would now like to address myself to the Mauritian population and \ntell them, listen to this carefully. In November 2024, you made a wise and courageous choice \nby choosing two true patriots: the hon. Prime Minister and the hon. Deputy Prime Minister \nand our team. The current Prime Minister and his Deputy both of whom have already served \nthis country as Prime Minister in their own right. Your decision was not a mistake. You \nplaced trust in them and we assure you that this trust will never be betrayed. They are not \nacting for popularity or political gain. They are making tough sometimes painful decisions \nnot because it is easy but because it is necessary for the future of our nation. They are \nresponsible leaders, committed to steering this country in the right direction even when the \npath is steep. \n Je vous demande de la patience. Les résultats viendront, les sacrifices consentis \naujourd’hui ouvrent la voie à un avenir meilleur. Et à la jeunesse de ce pays, nou bann zenn, \nen tant que ministre, je vous le dis avec conviction : tout ce que nous construisons \naujourd’hui est pour vous. Les opportunités, les réformes les investissements, tout cela est \npour votre avenir et c’est vous qui allez récolter demain, les fruits de ce que nous semons \naujourd’hui. Nou pe constrir enn repiblik Moris ki pou enn lakaz pou zot tou. \nMerci, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Dr. Ms Thannoo. \n(09.05 p.m.) \n Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka): Madam \nSpeaker, the past few days have been very eventful. We have been lynched, we have been \nshamed, we have been attacked constantly in the media. But what we call upon the people is \nto think, to come together, to discuss, to negotiate, the debate and to constructively contribute \nto the ongoing task of rebuilding the nation. What we have lived through the past 10 years \nhas been chaos. \nOne term that has been repeated again and again is the term neoliberalism. Indeed, \nneoliberalism is chaos. It is a dominant system that Naomi Klein has described as disaster \ncapitalism and disaster capitalism only instils chaos, despair and destruction. Our dear \nfriends, the hon. Uteem and the hon. Assirvaden clearly underlined the chaos that we \ninherited. I need not go into details but what I want people to remember is what neoliberalism \nis really. It gives rise to consumers according to Chomsky. It erects shopping malls instead of \n\n151 \n \nbuilding communities. It seeks to impose individualism whereby the self is isolated and \ndisconnected from his or her social environment. \nNeoliberalism in effect destroys social ties. It destroys empathy and reduces the self to \nsocial powerlessness. Its primary aim is to reduce the government’s role in economic \nplanning. It promotes the privatisation of government entities and reduces its expenditure. \nAccording to Huffman, neoliberal economics is notorious for lowering taxes in all categories \nwhile upholding the discourse of austerity. \nNow is this what we are doing? When we heard about the panoply of taxes being \nimposed on the elites. From the UK model of austerity that has been imposed in recent years. \nWhat we retained is the suffering of the people, pain and misery were extensively inflicted \nwhen the welfare state was dismantled. The disabled were starved to death in the fifth richest \ncountry of the world and this is precisely what we are not doing. \nMadam Speaker, we share the pain of our people, we share the anxiety of thousands of \nworkers waiting to retire from exploitative workplaces. We empathise with every employee \nwho suffers from both psychological and physical strain imposed in the workplace. We \ntherefore welcome the setting up of key committees that will work towards the \nimplementation of a strong policy to enable dignified and decent support to be provided to \nemployees who can qualify as people without the ability to work. This is the difference that \nwe make when we discuss, when we debate, when we negotiate. We learn and we progress. \nLife matters, Madam Speaker, and we will continue to fight for the 40 hours work week \nand improved work conditions for all. So that retirement age does not become a matter that is \nso sensitive on this island particularly because we still bear the legacy of colonialism in our \nveins. The major outcry against this budget has understandably silenced major tax reforms \nthat are precisely aimed at forging social justice. As noted previously, we have a new policy \non the smart cities. This shows that the government has concertedly assessed ways in which \nbig capital preys on our territory and barely pays any cent on land conversion or any other tax \nrelated to property development under the smart city scheme. \nNow, this type of tax that targets the elite is precisely what neoliberalism condemns. \nHere we are challenging neoliberal economics and focusing on enhancing public revenue. \nThe taxes targeted towards categories of wealth indicates further measures to ensure that the \npublic coffers are filled, because now, as has been underlined before, they are empty. \n\n152 \n \nIndeed, Madam Speaker, the budget contains important measures that will make a \nstrong difference to our lives in our community and build the social ties that neoliberalism \nseeks to destroy. May I begin with the key measure to digitalise the Social Security services. \nThis measure indicates that the budget has taken into account a severe impediment to the \nlives of the neediest and the most vulnerable. With thousands of files awaiting processing, the \nprocedures for the neediest to access to his or her pension were severely hindered resulting in \ndistress, distrust and despair. With digitalisation, we can look forward to fairer and just \nprocesses based on clarity and transparency.  \nSimilarly, the digitalisation of the health sector is a fundamental requirement for our \nsociety to move forward with a social conscience, with empathy, care and consideration. It is \ninconceivable that the island was once earmarked as a cyber hub. Yet, the health sector has \nremained notorious with the amount of paperwork being undertaken by trained nurses sitting \nin offices while the sickly despairs for professional care. The digitalisation of both sectors has \nannounced within his budget reflects this Government’s determination to improve the lives of \nthe most fragile members of our community. Thus, neoliberalism that seeks to dismantle the \nwelfare sector is being challenged.  \nIn the past, we need to remember, neoliberalism dictated the dysfunctionality that was \nbuilt in the public systems through the consistent lack of investment. Now with digitalisation, \nwe are investing in efficient running of both the health and social security sectors. This \nGovernment is tackling head-on two major challenges that impact on the lives of many \nbeneficiaries and employees alike.  A responsible government indeed seeks to alleviate \nhassle, pain and the drudgery of thousands. \nMadam Speaker, this budget speaks to us ecofeminists who have long denounced the \nmanner in which capitalism exploits women’s bodies in the workplace and at home. Care \nwork is work undertaken mostly by women. In the home when you raise their families and \nlook after the elderly. Through care work, women primarily contribute to social reproduction \nwithout which society cannot survive. Care work guarantees that as a community we thrive, \nthat we can look forward to future with healthy and functional human beings. \nHowever, across Mauritian history, especially with the advent of the manufacturing \nsector, women’s work in the home has been consistently exploited. In the contemporary \ncontext, women are exploited in the workplace and at home while contributing millions to the \nGDP. The finance sphere is a key example where women often have to sacrifice their careers \n\n153 \n \nfor lesser paid roles. With emphasis placed on flexible work arrangements, this budget \ndemonstrates a gender-sensitive approach. Let us not forget how our work-life schedules \nhave been based on the American capitalist model implemented in the 1950s, that entrapped \nwomen in the domestic sphere. Women looked after their home while men worked. Now, \nwomen work long hours and look after the home, resulting in a crippling mental charge. \nMadam Speaker, this budget is gender-aware, gender-sensitive and gender-conscious \ntowards thousands of women working long hours, women who commute hours during heavy \ntraffic on unreliable buses, and women who often have to sacrifice their career for their \nfamily lives or vice versa. The hybrid work model, when implemented effectively, will be a \ngame changer. It promises better work-life balance, more job satisfaction and higher \nengagement in the workplace. Importantly, the hybrid work model also enables work access \nto women with disabilities, and it promises safety from autocratic management models. \nWe must also note, Madam Speaker, that research has identified how working from \nhome enables women to be more present in the STEM fields. We know STEM fields are \nnotoriously male dominant. We, therefore, applaud the promotion of a hybrid work model \nand call for employee-centred policies that will promote work-life balance while keeping \nsurveillance at bay.  \nMoreover, Madam Speaker, the budget has underlined key measures that will be taken \nto support women’s entrepreneurship. We will come with increased support and hope that \nthey will be geared to as many women as possible while ensuring that long-term support is \nprovided. Similarly, with the equity fund, we expect long term empowerment and certainly \nsupport when pitfalls or problems arise.  \nThis budget, Madam Speaker, also addresses our key challenges in the future, namely \nfood security and the climate crisis. We hereby make a strong appeal, envisaged by the \nMinistry of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries, that we need to \ninvest in long-term sustainability, that can only be achieved through the implementation of \nagroecology. Uganda’s National Agroecology Strategy and India’s Zero Budget Natural \nFarming are models whereby State driven national policies, legislations and programmes can \nrevolutionise our agricultural sector towards proven long-term agroecological sustainability. \nMadam Speaker, I also want to underline the importance of the point-based license. \nOver the past years, we have seen how our roads have become spaces of sheer murder. My \ndear friend here was just telling me that she had witnessed a horrifying accident during the \n\n154 \n \nweekend, where somebody’s brain was actually blown to bits. They had to wait 45 minutes \nfor the ambulance services and the Police services to come. Our road culture is horrifying. It \nis scary for the elderly to step even on the road in front of their houses. The point-based \nlicense is a much needed, much welcomed measure that was formally thrown away like the \nbaby with the bath water by the previous regime. It was so ridiculous.  \nNow, what we need with this point-based system is certainly a means to counter, not \nonly a terrible driving culture, but the common incidences of chauffeurs, of drivers actually \ndriving under the influence of drugs. We do have, in my constituency, bus drivers actually \nflying by on the buses, causing a lot of endangerments, not only to the commuters, but to \nanybody on the road. So, thank you for bringing back the point-based licence. \nI will now conclude with two important measures that aim at shaping a safe and eco-\ncentric future for us all. Emphasis made on renewable sources of energy denotes the strong \nwill of this Government to protect the environment. Given the current energy crisis, \ndeveloping our optimal capacity in solar, wind and wave energy is an imperative. Energy \ndiversification is a must. We have the duty towards effectively equipping the MARENA with \nall support so that they can actually shift us away from the deadly core use of coal and oil. \nWe also have to be wary about biomass.  \nWe equally welcome the aim to develop the blue economy from a sustainable \nperspective. We felt reassured when the Prime Minister recently addressed the inclusion of \nthe rights of nature in our Constitution at the United Nations Ocean Conference in Nice. This \nis indeed a powerful signal. We thank the hon. Prime Minister and reiterate our feel for our \nocean to be protected, particularly against the spectre of blue washing. Saya de Malha, for \nexample, is so fragile. Our friendly ecologist, Shaama Sandooyea, led one of our first protests \nthere, first underwater protest to show how fragile is this ocean, because the Indian Ocean is \nthe fastest warming ocean in the entire world. So, if we do not protect the ocean, our entire \nlives will be put at stake. So, sustainable fishing has to be carefully implemented. \nMadam Speaker, we need to be wary and we need to be careful because the neoliberals \nare out there. The predators are out there. Our struggle against neoliberalism is ongoing. We \nwill never give up the fight. \nThank you. With these words, I support the Bill. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Caserne! \n(9.22 p.m.) \n\n155 \n \nMr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne Longue): Thank \nyou, Madam Speaker. I rise today in this august Assembly to support the 2025-2026 national \nbudget, fully aware and fully honest that we do so under the weight of an unsustainable \neconomic situation with a public debt of Rs642 billion, representing 90% of the GDP.  \nPublic deficit reaching a record of 9.8%, rising cost of living, depreciating currency and \nsluggish economy productivity have put immense pressure on the lives of our citizens. The \ncountry is under the threat of facing a downgrade in credit ratings from international agencies \nlike Moody’s, which would have a significant negative impact on our financial sectors. \nMadam Speaker, I firmly believe that this budget is a step in the right direction, not \nbecause it solves all our problems overnight, but because it lays a foundation for recovery, \nresilience and reform. Let us be truthful, our economic model has become strained. Over \nreliance on imports, low industrial productivity and excessive recurrent spending have \ncombined to create an unsustainable path. This budget, however, begins a structural \ncorrection. It does not offer populist comfort. It offers tough necessary choices, such as \nprioritising development spending over consumption and reigning in non-essential \nexpenditures across the public sector.  \nThe Budget outlines measures to stabilise our macroeconomic fundamentals such as \ngradual reduction of the fiscal deficit debt, restructuring and revenue expansion through fair \nand efficient taxation. Not by burdening the poor but by widening the base and ceiling leaks, \nwe are laying the foundation for a sustainable and resilient economy. \nMadam Speaker, the planning for investment of Rs128 billion for the next 5 years to \nfund various infrastructures, ranging from housing to transport, water, wastewater, solid \nwaste and electricity, demonstrates this Government’s commitment to create job, improve \ncurrent infrastructure but also ensure that our citizens are provided with infrastructure \nfacilities which are up to standards. The long overdue construction of the Rivière des \nAnguilles Dam, upgrading and rehabilitation of water treatment plants and replacement of \nwaterpipes programme can only improve the water distribution around the island. \nMadam Speaker, ports are not merely physical entry and exit ports. They are the \nlifeblood of our trade economy and gateways to regional integration. For a country like ours, \nwhose growth depends heavily on maritime trade, the efficiency of our ports directly affects \nour GDP, job creation and investor confidence. The reason why I consider the decision of \n\n156 \n \nmassive investment up to Rs5.4 billion in our port infrastructure to expand the cruise jetty, \nacquisition of tugs and expansion of the Mauritius Container Terminal reflect the vision of \nthis Government to accommodate more vessels and gain in competitive edge. The Cargo \nHandling Corporation will also be investing in equipment such as crane, tractors and traders \nso that Mauritius claims back its reputation of being one of the most efficient ports in the \nregion and achieve our target of being a transshipment hub.  \nWith these investments, we will complete the expand container handling capacity at the \nMauritius Container Terminal. These are not abstract investments, they translate directly into \nbusiness for our local transporters and foster movement of goods for our SMEs and exporters. \nMadam Speaker, drug addiction is not just a health crisis, it is a security threat, an \neconomic burden and a moral emergency. It destroys lives, tears apart families and erodes the \nfuture of our youth. Addiction is a disease not a crime, and this Budget recognises that truth, \nby prioritizing treatment and reintegration, not only punishment. We cannot afford to sit \nback. This Budget sends the signals that we are ready to act decisively, compassionately and \nstrategically. Madam Speaker, nou pa zis promet, nou dir e nou pe fer ! The National Agency \nfor Drug Control, with the aim of combatting drug trafficking, is today a reality. To allow this \nAgency to perform its duties and meet its objectives, an amount of Rs70 million has been \nearmarked in this Budget to support the operational set up of the Agency, and it must be \noutlined.  \nMadam Speaker, a healthy population is not just a moral imperative, it is the foundation \nof a strong and productive economy. If we want sustainable growth, we must ensure that our \npeople are healthy, cared for and protected. Our health system is facing challenges and \nrequires deep reform to respond to our population’s demand.  \nFirst, we are facing a consequent increase in non-communicable diseases, ageing \npopulation and increasingly complex health threats. This Budget enlightens the clear \nintentions of this Government to improve the health services in the public sector by making \nprovisions for the creation of a new healthcare system that will prioritise prevention through \nhealthy lifestyle campaign and robust NCD management; the allocation of additional \nresources in healthcare that will allow us to shift from a reactive hospital care to preventive \nand community-based care. More findings on education, early diagnosis, nutrition campaigns \nand lifestyle support will save us billions in long-term treatment cost.  \n\n157 \n \nWe need to improve the services in regional hospitals to uplift the services for essential \ntreatment. The digital health must no longer be treated as a luxury but a necessity. This will \neliminate paper health records and long queuing, reducing waiting time, improve efficiency \nand enhance transparency. \nI must also lay emphasis on the fact that this Budget provides for the necessary \nequipment and staffing, with the recruitment of 1,000 student nurses over the next 3 years, 50 \ntrainee midwives, 50 medical health officers and 30 specialists, among others, to cut the \nwaiting time for treatment, which will be beneficial to all patients.  \nIt is also important to stress the fact that there is a need for better data collection and \npublic health surveillance. Without accurate data, we cannot plan or act effectively. With this \nBudget, we have an opportunity to modernise our healthcare system and adapt it to the \nexigencies of our citizens. \nMadam Speaker, education is the foundation of every successful nation but higher \neducation, universities, research institutions, technical and professional training are where \nthat foundation becomes a launch pad for innovation, leadership and sustainable growth. \nWhen we invest in higher education, we are not just building campuses, we are building \nfutures. We are equipping our youth with the skills, knowledge and confidence to meet the \nchallenges of tomorrow, from digital transformation to climate change, from entrepreneurship \nto public health. By prioritizing higher education, we can reduce brain drain and retain top \ntalents within our borders, drive innovation through research and development, create a \nskilled workforce that attracts foreign investment and uplift the entire communities through \nknowledge and opportunity. Let us all support the project to invest in high quality education. \nMadam Speaker, we live in a digital age where convenience, transparency and \nefficiency are not luxuries, they are expectations. Yet, our current social security systems are \noften plagued by delays and outdated processes that frustrates our citizens. The e-social \nsecurity system represents a long-term solution all beneficiaries. First, it brings efficiency and \naccessibility. By digitizing social security services, we remove the barriers of geography, \nlong queues and piles of paperwork. An electronic system ensures transparency and \naccountability. Every transaction, application and update can be tracked in real time. It \nminimises errors and builds trust between the Government and the people it serves. In a time \nwhen public trust is more valuable than ever, transparency is a powerful tool. \n\n158 \n \nMost importantly, the e-social security system is a foundation for long-term \nsustainability. Digital records are easier to maintain, audit and analyse. With better data, \nGovernment can make smarter policy decisions, allocate resources more effectively and \npredict future needs more accurately. This is how we create a system that does not just work \ntoday but one that lasts for generations. Of course, challenges exist. Data privacy, digital \nliteracy and infrastructure must all be addressed but these are challenges that we can \novercome with proper planning, education and investment. The cost of inaction, however, is \nmuch higher: inefficiency, inequality and lost opportunities. Implementing an e-social \nsecurity system is not just about using new technologies, it is about reaffirming our \ncommitment to serve every citizen with dignity, speed and fairness. \nMadam Speaker, across our communities, we face growing environmental challenges, \npolluted air, unsafe water, deforestation, plastic wastes, noise pollution and the effects of \nclimate change. These are not just distant issues. They are happening right here in our \nneighbourhoods, our rivers, our streets. Environmental nuisances, whether it is overflowing \ngarbage, polluted air or constant industrial noise, are not just unpleasant, they are harmful. \nThey damage our health, reduce our quality of life and rob future generations of the clean, \nsafe world they deserve. \nCombatting environmental nuisances or larger climate threats takes collective effort. \nIndustries must adopt cleaner, greener practices, but citizens also have the duty to change \ncurrent habits by reducing wastes, plant trees, conserve energy and speak up when we see \npollution going uncheck and support all means of education and awareness. When people \nknow the impact of their actions, they make better choices. Let’s teach sustainability in our \nschools. Bring green practices into our businesses and encourage community clean-up tribes \nand recycling initiatives. Every plastic bottle we recycle, every tree we plant, every voice \nraised for change counts. These small acts build momentum, and momentum leads to lasting \nimpact. This budget goes in that direction. I personally welcome the Deposit Refund Scheme \nfor plastic bottle which aims at reducing the number of plastic bottles being landed into \nenvironment, but also encourages a recycle culture. \nThe environment does not need a few people doing everything perfectly. It needs all of \nus doing what we can consistently. I am happy that this budget recognises the importance of \naddressing such issues and has made a provision for an increase in the penalty rates to combat \n\n159 \n \nthe environmental nuisances associated with excessive noise and black smoke emissions from \nmotor vehicles that are not correctly maintained.  \nMadam Speaker, we are living through a global turning point. One where the decisions \nwe make about energy will shape our environment, our economies and our communities for \ngenerations to come. Among the smartest, most strategic decision we can make right now is \nto invest in renewable energy, particularly solar energy and biomass. Climate change is \naccelerating and our dependence on fossil fuel is a major driver. Renewable energy will help \nus fight this crisis without sacrificing our lifestyle. The funding of projects in the renewable \nenergy sector for the next three years mainly in solar energy and biomass is a turning point in \nthe transition of shifting from fossil fuel to renewable energy. \nMadam Speaker, the world of work is changing faster than ever. Automation, Artificial \nIntelligence and digital transformation are rewriting the rules of productivity and competition. \nIn this new era, our most valuable asset is not just technology. It is people. To stay \ncompetitive, we must invest in their skills. Upskilling our workforce is not a cost. It is the \nsmartest investment we can make for a resilient economy. For every rupee we invest in \nworkforce development, we gain in returns in innovation, productivity and reduced \nunemployment.  \nIt is time to align our education system with industry needs, expand access to technical \ntraining and support lifelong learning. Let us futureproof our economy by empowering our \npeople today. This Government understood these challenges and will uphold its commitment \nto invest Rs550 m. for the training, reskilling and upskilling of our labour force that will only \nbe beneficial to our country. \nMadam Speaker, public enterprises play a crucial role in delivering essential services: \ntransportation, utilities, finance, infrastructure and more. They are meant to operate for public \nwelfare. However, their potential remains underutilised or mismanaged largely due to \noutdated systems, weak accountability and limited innovation. Reforming public enterprises \nis not about dismantling them. It is about strengthening them. It is about creating institutions \nthat are transparent, efficient and responsive to the needs of the people.  \nThe goal is to transform these enterprises from bureaucratic machines into engines of \nsustainable development. Institutional reform begins with governance. We need clear, merit-\nbased appointments to leadership positions, independent boards and robust performance \nevaluation system and Key Performance Indicators. Decision-making should be aligned with \n\n160 \n \nlong-term strategic goals. We must also invest in capacity building. Reform is not just about \ncutting costs. It is about building systems that include digital transformation, staff training, \nfinancial management and data-driven decision making. A modern public enterprise must \nfunction like a smart business with the heart of a public servant.  \nInstitutional reform is never easy. It requires political will, cultural change and sustain \ncommitment. We must be bold enough to confront inefficiency, brave enough to correct \ncourse and wise enough to build system that outlast anyone administration.  \nThe 2025-2026 Budget makes provision to increase the efficiency of public enterprise \nin order to make them financially sustainable, efficient and accountable through a coordinated \npolicy approach focus on strengthening governance and oversight. \nMadam Speaker, supporting employees through tax exemption is a strategic investment \nin our workforce. The people who keep our economies moving and our communities thriving, \nit tells workers: we see your effort, we value your contribution, and we are here to help you \nsucceed.  \nMoreover, financial support through tax relief can improve employee well-being and \nworkplace moral. When workers feel financially stable, they are healthier, more focused and \nmore loyal to their employers. That’s a win for businesses and for society. It is good to \nremember that in the 2025-2026 Budget, the new tax rates are as follows – \n• \n0% for all income earners up to Rs500,000; \n• \n10% for the next Rs500,000 and remaining at 20%. \nCompared to the current taxes, tax rates introduced by the former government, where \n2% was applicable for every income earner who earns Rs430,000 and an additional 4% was \ncharged for the next Rs40,000. With these new rates, hon. Minister Uteem has outlined it \nearlier, 81% of employees in our country will not pay any income tax. In line with our \nengagement towards the population, a promise of abolition of registration duty applicable on \nsale transfer of pre-owned domestic vehicle is becoming a reality. \nMadam Speaker, despite the current status of our economy, I have to mention that this \nGovernment guarantees a monthly income of Rs20,000 for all full-time employees under \nRevenue Minimum Garantie.  \nBefore concluding, Madam Speaker, let me say a few words, on Constituency No. 4, \nPort Louis North and Montagne Longue. I, again, would like to seize that opportunity to \n\n161 \n \nthank the electors of this constituency for having massively voted for the candidates of \nAlliance du Changement under the 2024 General Elections. Today, we are proudly \nrepresenting them in this Parliament. A Constituency that faces a lot of challenges, ranging \nfrom flood during heavy rain, severely affecting the residents of Vallée des Prêtres, Cité La \nCure and Morcellement La-Vallée, among others. While the regions of Batterie-Cassée, Riche \nTerre and Terre Rouge suffer from an acute water supply issue. \nLast but not least, the poor conditions of the streets at Cité La Cure, Batterie-Cassée \nand Montagne Longue, following the Waterpipes Replacement Programme under the former \ngovernment, where the state of the roads have not been reinstated. However, it is quite \nencouraging to see that under the 2025-2026 Budget, there are several projects that have \nalready been earmarked, as detailed in the Public Sector Investment Programme, under the \nconstruction and upgrading of drainage infrastructure for Vallée des Prêtres, Morcellement \nLa-Vallée, Morcellement Raffray, Terre Rouge, Cité Roma, Valton and Montagne Longue, \nwhich can only be beneficial to the inhabitants of these regions. It makes no doubt that funds \nwill also be available to upgrade the level of road infrastructure in the regions I have \nmentioned above, including Bois Marchand. \nMadam Speaker, before concluding, I would like to thank the hon. Minister of Youth \nand Sports whose Ministry has engaged in a commendable project of bringing sports on the \nstreets, give that energy, that will, cette envie de refaire du sport under a project named ‘Anou \nTransform Nou Landrwa’. The first edition took place in my constituency Sunday last at Karo \nKalyptus. I must say that it was a real success. The only day of activity has reunited all MPs \nof the constituency, sportsman, youngsters and the Bishop of Port Louis. Thank you and well \ndone, hon. Minister for this initiative. I know it will be a success in the future. \nTo conclude, Madam Speaker, we are at a cross road in our national story. We can \nretreat into blame and hesitation or we can rise with unity, discipline and vision. This budget \ndoes not fix everything but it begins to fix what matters most. It is a path from hardship to \nhope, from breakdown to breakthrough, from abyss to prosperity; let us support it with \ncourage and compassion. \nThank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nYes. Hon. Lobine! Try and keep to the time because it’s getting late.  \n\n162 \n \n(9.45 p.m.) \nMr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne &Phoenix) Yes, Madam Speaker, \nthank you for giving me the floor. I will take that into consideration. All learned colleagues, \nlearned friends, hon. Members have taken the time of this House to debate and I will not \nrepeat what have been said because it is said and we are all tired, I know. \nI would concur very much with what the hon. minister Uteem have been saying. He has \ngiven detailed figures and fact as to in what type of a situation we are and what the \npopulation need to take into account before taking any decision or before having any other \npolitical vultures canvassing and giving false information to them. And this is the temple of \ndemocracy where we need to disseminate that crucial factual information to the people of \nMauritius because where we are, we have been left with a legacy of financial \nmismanagement and we are now in an abyss of misrule.  \nAnd, I go directly into what all the population is talking about, reform of pensions, \nMadam Speaker. I am very glad and thankful to the hon. Prime Minister, that he came with \nthis very detailed, clear explanation as to what the reform is all about, why we need to \nproceed with reform as it is but of course to the hon. Prime Minister that he has listened to the \nvoice of the people of Mauritius, and I will quote at page 13 of his speech so that we can \ndisseminate that to the people of Mauritius. I quote – \n “In light of the devastating legacy left by the previous administration, we had no \nchoice but to confront the urgent need for pension reform head on.  However, we \nremain deeply mindful of the challenges the most vulnerable may face under the \nproposed changes and are committed to addressing their concerns with compassion and \nempathy.” \nThis is very important. \nThe people of Mauritius appreciate this phrase ‘compassion and empathy’ because as a \ndemocratic government, as the hon. Prime Minister goes on to say – \n“ … we have heard these concerns. …” \nSo, this is what democracy is all about. There is a proposal, we are debating on an \nAppropriation Bill. There are proposals, the people of Mauritius have made their voices heard \nand the government and the Prime Minister have listened to the voices. And, this is the \nconsequence of those very pillar of democracy that we now have those two committees set up \n\n163 \n \nby the hon. Prime Minister that he will preside and one by the hon. Minister for Social \nIntegration, Social Security and National Solidarity.  \nSo, this is very commendable and most of those reforms that we are talking about is \nwhat the people of Mauritius they want to hear – that is compassion for the housewives, \ncompassion for those in the lower middle class of the job sphere, manual workers, general \nworkers and these are all being addressed in those two committees and I am thankful to the \nhon. Prime Minister for that.  \nThere are various countries in the world, Madam Speaker, that have been having talks \nabout reforms. Here, in Mauritius, it was long overdue. The hon. Prime Minister was talking \nabout an expert, un actuaire, he said – \n« La bombe du système des pensions a déjà explosé »  \nThis is what the hon. Prime Minister was referring to, Mr Sattar Jackaria. So, the bomb, as \nhon. Dr. Boolell said, was ticking but for the experts la bombe du système des pensions a déjà \nexplosé. \nSo, we need to disseminate; we need to give to the people of Mauritius materials, \nfactual information of what is happening and this is the backdrop of the Appropriation Bill. \nThis is the State of the Economy. It has been a very comprehensive document that was \npresented before this august Assembly by the hon. Prime Minister.  \nUnfortunately, the Leader of the Opposition does not understand what those documents \nare all about. When we are in a temple of democracy, we are tabling the State of the \nEconomy and this is being consolidated through the Estimates of the Budget that we have \ncirculated to all members. Then, it is almost unfair and misleading for politicians to go out \nand say all sorts of things that does not fall into the context of what the people of Mauritius \nare expecting – truth, reality about the state of the economy.  \nAnd, with your permission, Madam Speaker, let me quote from the State of the \nEconomy, one of the biggest scandals, if I may say, for the past 10 15 20 years. – the setting \nup of the Mauritius Investment Corporation Ltd.     \nPeople of Mauritius need to know why in 2020, the then government, set up the \nMauritius Investment Corporation Ltd. It was meant to assist companies that needed support \nto ride out the COVID-9 crisis. And the hon. Prime Minister answered to a question this \nmorning as the largesse that was given to Nundun Gopee. He was not affected by COVID. \n\n164 \n \nHe was building his empire on public funds. So, this is not a crisis company that has been \naffected by COVID. \nWe are giving public money, tax payers’money to cronies of the previous government \nto do business. They take nothing from their pockets; they take it from the pockets of the \npeople of Mauritius through this infamous Mauritius Investment Corporation Ltd. \nAnd what the people of Mauritius need to know is that they have been printing money, \nMadam Speaker. I quote – \n“The printing of money by the Bank of Mauritius to fund the MIC was an irresponsible \nact which has had deleterious effects on the monetary system.” \nThis is very serious. These are criminal intents that are now being inquired by the Financial \nCrimes Commission. And this, the population of Mauritius should know and this is through \ndissemination of information through the temple of democracy. People are listening, the press \nwill report it that they need to know what has happened. I would urge each and every \nMauritian, we need to go through the State of the Economy, all the figures are here.  \nMadam Speaker, if we look at the debt that has been increasing since 2014, when in \n2014 the Labour-led government left, the debt was Rs238 billion – R 238 milliards. We are \nnow talking; everyone is talking about it. Figures are proving it; it is now R 642 millards.  \nSo, we are in a dire situation. That is why I would qualify this budget as a patriotic \nbudget, a budget that is taking all the required precautions not to squander the future of the \npeople, the youth of this country. That is why, this debate on pensions should be \ndispassionate but we should look at the people who are more vulnerable. What they need is \npolitical assistance, the social assistance and we need to communicate and tell them what \ngovernment is doing through facts and figures, not listening to all political vultures that are \ncausing harm to this country through all sorts of negative and false propaganda. So, from this \ntemple of democracy, we need to transmit it to the people of Mauritius. \nMadam speaker, with regard to this budget, we have been talking about Moody’s – how \nin 2014, it was Baa1 and now we are in Baa3 with a negative outlook. People should \nunderstand.  \nAgain, hon. Minister Uteem vividly portrayed it with a delicate example as in a family \nwhen you take loan what will happen when you don’t pay your loans.  \n\n165 \n \nSo, again, people should understand. We need to again use this platform, temple of \ndemocracy, to make the people understand. It is our duty as parliamentarians to go out and \nexplain that to the people of Mauritius. I know when we will talk to the people of Mauritius, \nthey will understand the gravity of the situation, as today portrayed by the hon. Prime \nMinister in his deliberate speech with regard to the pension reforms. \nIn this budget also, Madam Speaker, we are talking about creating wealth from abyss to \nprosperity. We need to create wealth. On that score, again, I would congratulate the \nGovernment to at least having taken care of our port sector. Through years in the previous \nmandate, myself, hon. Uteem and hon. Minister, Dr. Boolell, have been asking the previous \ngovernment why are they not developing the port masterplan since 2021. Why is it that we \nhave left our port in such a dismay?  The international community has been puzzled when \nthey came to know that we were ranked by the World Bank Report, Madam Speaker, as one \nof the least efficient ports in the region. We were ranked 369th globally.  \nWe were behind the port of Toamasina in Madagascar. We were behind Mayotte. We \nwere behind the port of Reunion. So, this is not something that is very encouraging when we, \nas parliamentarians, in the previous mandate, were asking the government to go ahead with \nthe port masterplan, because this is a new pillar of the economy.  \nUnfortunately, they did not do so. I am very pleased that there is an allocation in the \nbudget for Rs4.4 billion towards port infrastructure that will construct the bunker barge jetty, \nthe container terminal extension and the digitalisation of logistics. \n These are commendable steps forward to create this pillar of the economy. If I may say \nso, Madam Speaker, hon. Minister Dr. Boolell talked about an Ocean State and large \nterritorial waters. We have around 22,000 big vessels that pass through our territorial waters \nevery year, Madam Speaker. We have only 1,000 vessels that will stop at Mauritius for \nbunkering purposes. This is something that is alarming. For example, Panama runs its \neconomy with its port. It attracts big vessels. It has constructed the Panama Canal from which \nit runs its economy. Even President Trump is a little jealous of the success of Panama with \nregard to attracting all the big vessels!  \nIf we manage to attract at least 5,000 to 6,000 vessels in the years to come at our port, \nthis will be a major breakthrough to develop this very important economic pillar for our \nsociety, Madam Speaker. This is not something new. Way back in our history, we were called \nand we are still called in our Coat of Arms, the Star and Key of the Indian Ocean. So, let us \n\n166 \n \nbe the Star and Key of the Indian Ocean. With the massive investment being made in the port, \nI am sure that we shall shine as the Star and Key of the Indian Ocean.  \nSo, again, I thank the Government for placing so much resources to the Cargo Handling \nCorporation and to the Mauritius Ports Authority.  \nWith regard to the reform of the Judiciary, Madam Speaker, again, when we took \nGovernment, it was a question about saving the democracy. We have the Labour Party, the \nMMM and Rezistans ek Alternativ who were born to fight and to preserve the rights of \nworkers. We, in Nouveaux Démocrates, were born to save our democracy. We joined hands \nwith the MMM, the Labour Party and Rezistans ek Alternativ to save our democracy. To save \nour democracy, we have the duty now to continue to make our democracy workable.  \nWe need a participative democracy. I am very happy to note that we are moving ahead, \nat page 53 of the Budget Speech, we are setting up the Constitutional Review Commission. It \nis very important after 57 years to have a look at our Constitution. It is in our political \nmandate to have a look at electoral reforms and also at major issues that we need to amend in \nour Constitution.  \nAgain, Madam Speaker, I welcome the creation of the National Prosecution Service. \nWe know very well what happened to the DPP’s Office. Also, I am very thankful now that we \nhave come to an end to a case that was lodged way back in 2015 whereby the DPP’s Office \nwas suing the Attorney General’s Office and it went on for years. Fortunately, now, this is not \nthe case. It is good for the working of our penal system that we have an independent DPP’s \nOffice. The creation of the National Prosecution Service, headed by the DPP and modelled on \nthe UK system, is a very good move ahead for our country.  \nThis goes in the spirit of transparency. With regard to expansion of e-Judiciary, this is \nalso a very commendable effort from Government to invest so that our Judiciary will get \nmodern equipment and will move forward so that cases are not delayed. This will lay the \nfoundation for the Investment Code that we need to bring so that all the foreign investments \nthat will be coming to this country will feel safe and secure that we have the required \nmechanism and jurisdiction to have a fast and speedy justice, especially with regard to \nmediation.  \nAgain, mediation was brought by arbitration. Brought by the hon. Prime Minister \nagain! Since 2014, no consideration at all has been given to the promotion of arbitration and \nmediation in this country. There was so much investment that could have come to Mauritius, \n\n167 \n \nbut we do not have the required platform to treat them and give them the facilities to have \narbitration and mediation in Mauritius. \nWe have seen what has happened to Betamax. They had to move to Singapore. And we \nall know the cost of these arbitrations. Through innovation, Artificial Intelligence and \nbudgetary provisions, we will be moving to a modern jurisdiction in terms of arbitration and \nmediation.  \nWith regard to the pension, Madam Speaker, I am sure that we, parliamentarians, will \nbe able to participate and give our views in the committees. I am sure several \nrecommendations will be taken into consideration because there are countries that have the \ndual system. Brazil, for example, has passed on the age to 65 for the males, and 62 for \nfemales. They have a scheme of contributory pension. So, those who can contribute, \ncontribute. And those who cannot, the State will chip in. So, there are various possibilities, \nvarious schemes that could be devised that go along with the reform of pension that was long \noverdue.  \nMadam Speaker, I will not take much time. I will just thank the Government for its very \nfirst Appropriation Bill. I fully support the reforms, and I fully support the implementation of \nthe measures taken for various Ministries. I would only refer the House to what has been said \nin the State of the Economy Report, at page 35: “We have administrative and bureaucratic \nconstraints.” This was with the previous government. We still have administrative and \nbureaucratic constraints.  \nWe need to look at bureaucracy and inefficiencies in licensing processes that are \npervasive. We need to improve the system. I am sure if we remove all the red tapism and \nbureaucratic issues, I am sure that in the next 2-3 years, this will be a workable Appropriation \nBill that would create prosperity for the country and will take us from abyss to prosperity. I \nthank you for your kind attention. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Pentiah! \nMr Pentiah: Madam Speaker, listening to hon. Lobine, it seems that we were just \nstarting our session for today, but alas!  \nMadam Speaker, I beg to move for the adjournment of the debates. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded.  \nMadam Speaker: Everybody was waiting for you to speak! \n\n168 \n \nQuestion put and agreed to.  \nDebate adjourned accordingly. \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Wednesday 18 June 2025 at 11.30 a.m. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded.  \nQuestion put and agreed to.  \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned! \nAt 10.04 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Wednesday 18 June 2025 at \n11.30 a.m. \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nROSE BELLE CIVIL STATUS OFFICE – PROPOSED RELOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-17-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/572",
      "sitting_id": "24-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-24",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 572,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/572) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Heritage City \nProject, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the – \n(a) \namount of money received from India and Saudi Arabia therefor, if any, and \n\n28 \n \n(b) \nnumber of bids received for consultancy services therefor, indicating the name of \nthe successful bidder, further indicating \n(i) \nif it was the lowest bidder, and \n(ii) \nthe amount of money paid thereto and the mode of payment thereof.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning (Dr. Ms J. Jeetun): \nMadam Speaker, with your permission, I shall reply to PQ B/572 addressed to the hon. Prime \nMinister. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that no external grant was \nreceived either from India or Saudi Arabia for the implementation of the Heritage City \nProject. I wish to inform the House that from information available at the level of my \nMinistry on 09 October 2015, the previous government decided that the then Ministry of \nFinancial Services and Good Governance would be responsible for the development of the \nHeritage City Project on a plot of land of 336 arpents situated opposite Ebene Cyber City on \nthe left of Bagatelle dam. \nOn 18 December 2015, the then government approved the setting up of the Heritage \nCity Co. Ltd, a wholly state-owned company for the implementation of the Heritage City \nwith a timeframe of three years as from 2016. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, Madam Speaker, I am informed that a High-\nPowered Committee met on 23 February 2016 under the chairmanship of the then Secretary \nto Cabinet and Head of Civil Service and comprising the then Financial Secretary and \nSolicitor General to consider a due diligence report on the procurement of professional \nservices of Stree, that is, the name of a consultancy company, for an amount not exceeding \nUSD 4.34 million. \nAs per the report of the High-Powered Committee, the Heritage City Project was to be \nimplemented under a Government-to-Government arrangement between the Government of \nthe Republic of Mauritius and the Government of United Arabs Emirates. \nHowever, as per the file records at my Ministry, there is no documentary evidence of \nany proper Government to Government agreed in this regard. We found a letter that has been \nsigned by the chairman of PCFC Real Estate Development FZE and the Permanent Secretary \nof the Ministry of Financial Services, Good Governance and Institutional Reform which talks \nabout putting in place and it is already proposing to appoint Stree. So, this agreement is to \n\n29 \n \nappoint Stree consulting represented by Mr Ameer Shaheed to assist the Government of \nMauritius in respect of master planning, design, preparation and evaluation of bids. We could \nnot find, Madam Speaker, any proper Government to Government agreement between the \ntwo countries. \nRemember the dates the meeting of the High-Powered Committee happened on \n23 February 2016. Following the decision of the High-Powered Committee, the then \ngovernment approved on 02 March, so a few days later, the procurement of professional \nservices of Stree Consulting with the Heritage City Co. Ltd for an amount not exceeding \nRs4.34 million for master planning and engineering design and government officers’ \nschematic designs. \nAn agreement, a contract, was signed between Heritage City Co. Ltd and Stree \nContracting on 17 April 2016. On 16 March 2016, an amount of Rs55 million was transferred \nfrom the Accountant General to the State Bank of Mauritius in favour of Heritage City Co. \nLtd for implementation of the project. From records available at my Ministry, the total funds \ndisbursed to Stree Consulting Ltd through direct debit of SBM account of Heritage City Co. \nLtd was USD 1,102,795 equivalent to Rs 39,716,981, detailed as follows – \n• 15 April: an amount of USD 234,795 equivalent to Rs8,382,181 and  \n• on 01 June 2016, an amount of USD 868,000 equivalent to Rs31,344,800.  \nThese funds represented 20% of the mobilisation and the information gathering fees \nincluding additional revision of the concept master plan for Heritage City and travel air fare. \nSo, in fact Madam Speaker, Rs39.7 million spent without any RFP, without any proper \nprocurement procedure and nothing done, it was just mobilisation fee. So, nothing came out \nof it. I was doing some simple calculation: Rs 39.7 million down the drain. Week after week, \nwe throw a lot of millions of scandals but when you relate that, for example, our colleague \nwas just talking about electricity, that would pay for 80,000 vulnerable households on social \nregister if we pay Rs 500 for electricity bill. \nRs39.7 million, 40 million nearly, would pay 2000 underprivileged families with water \ntanks and pumps so they could get uninterrupted water supply as water 24/7 was but a \nfaraway dream. So, it was a lot of money wasted by the Ministry of Good Governance but no \ngood governance, no procedure. \n(Interruptions) \n\n30 \n \nMadam Speaker, Members of the House may be informed that the Heritage City Co. \nLtd has already been wound up since 29 April 2020 and, that is, marked as defunct as the \nrecords of the Registrar of Companies and it is to be noted that the remaining amount on the \nbank balance of Heritage City to the tune of Rs123,214 was returned to the Accountant \nGeneral on 28 January 2020. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister. Yes! \nMr Babajee: Hon. Minister, will you be able to inform the House who was responsible \nfor that Ministry and whether there would be a proper enquiry carried out in regards to those? \nDr. Ms Jeetun: That was Minister Roshi Bhadain. \nMadam Speaker: Former Minister. \nMr Babajee: Will there be any proper enquiry being carried out with regard to this? \nDr. Ms Jeetun: Yes, an enquiry will be carried out and I must add that it is a disgrace \nthat people like that are today down protesting on the street when they have squandered \nmoney like this. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: All right, so, we have finished with questions. \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \n The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that all the business on today’s \nOrder Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10.   \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \n Question put and agreed to. \nPUBLIC BILLS \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Gambling Regulatory Authority (Amendment) Bill \n(No. XV of 2025) was read a first time. \n \n \n\n31 \n \nSecond Reading \nTHE APPROPRIATION (2025-2026) BILL  \n(No. XIV of 2025) \nOrder read for resuming adjourned debate on the Appropriation (2025-2026) Bill (No. \nXIV of 2025). \nQuestion again proposed. \nMadam Speaker: Alright. Hon. Junior Minister, Mr Damry! \n(12.27 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Finance (Mr D. Damry): Madam Speaker, fellow citizens, I \nstand before you today engulfed in a turmoil of emotions just like you. Experts believe that \nMauritians will not and could not get paid pensions in the near future.  \nAs a patriot in a patriotic government, we cannot allow this to happen. On the one hand, \nI have my mother’s brother who turned 59 a couple weeks ago. I know an elderly lady who \nhas been working for 40 years. She is more than family and she turns 60 in December. They \nare both deeply affected. On the other hand, I am the Junior Minister of Finance and day in \nand day out, I see the precarious state of the public finances. As a caring and responsible \nGovernment, we have and we will always be sensitive to the public’s deeply rooted \nsentiments. The mind, the rationale says yes to the reforms, yet the inner self has a sense of \nunpreparedness. \nMadam Speaker, this battlefield of emotions has triggered deep reflections in me and \ncompelled me in finding meaning in the noise. There is a reason why we do things. The ‘why’ \nis innate, it is existential in our DNA, in our core, in our soul. The ‘why’ directs how we do \nwhat we do. The speakers of this House have very diligently canvassed the ‘how’ and the \n‘what’ of this budget and in the time allocated to me, I will try to focus on the ‘why’ of our \nbudget. The ‘why’ is protect generations. The ‘how’ is bridge to the future and budget \nresponsibility. The ‘what’, pension reforms and structural reforms.  \nBut before I proceed with our ‘why’, I would like, Madam Speaker, to pause for a \nminute. Let us think. Let us try to decipher the ‘why’ of the previous Government and their \nbudget ideologies so that we get a proper understanding of our budget. First, the State of the \nEconomy document prepared by the civil servants under the supervision of the Financial \nSecretary shattered the money illusion into brutal reality. There was a lot of variances in the \n\n32 \n \ndebt, the budget deficits, in the accounting of GBC reserves into primary surplus, into mixing \ngross international reserves with net international reserves. \nLet us go back to the ‘why’ of the MSM. Were the generous handouts of the MSM \ndriven by social concern or were they politically calculated to consolidate power? Was there a \ndeliberate method behind the populist measures? A hidden agenda to sedate public opinion, to \ncreate dependence, to manipulate the masses? Mauritians are not naïve. We know there is no \nsuch thing as a free lunch. A household that spends beyond its means goes into debt, so does a \nnation. Rs180 billion printed, distributed, vanished. Rs520,000 of debt per head. At the stroke \nof a pen, the MSM eliminated the NPF and defrauded the acquired rights of the workers. \nThey taxed the workers through the CSG tax and left a deficit of Rs9.8 billion. The MSM \nrisked the very existence of pensions, whose sustainability was already questioned by the \nIMF and World Bank in 2015 and 2021, and a working committee of the Ministry of Social \nSecurity in 2018. They did not care about our people. They could care less about a \ndowngrade from Baa1 to Baa2 to Baa3 during their mandate as they did not care about \nMauritius being put into a grey list.  \nSo, Madam Speaker and friends, think deeper. Which organisation hands out money \nand instils fear to build a network of control and dependency? Can we think? I would not like \nto use the word because it is not strong enough. The word is mafia. Did the MSM dare to run \nMauritius on mafia-style control? Did the MSM try to shape our paradise island into the \nJugnauth-owned enterprise? If you think this is the ‘why’ of the MSM, do not ever let those \npolitical bandits basking under the sun on the beaches of Maradiva, get their hands on public \nmoney again. \nNow, Madam Speaker, let me focus on our ‘why’. As we reimagine our future, we must \nask; are we crafting a vision for the challenges ahead or are we just keeping a broken system \nalive? Former French Prime Minister, Dominique de Villepin in his piece ‘Le pouvoir de dire \nnon’, wrote that we are not facing a temporary crisis but une bascule d’époque, a tipping \npoint in history. He warns that our planet’s finite resources cannot support infinite economic \ngrowth. This budget does not just accommodate the transition, it accelerates it with \ndecarbonised transport and energy, investment in a circular economy, real focus on food and \nwater security. This budget funds education, reforms health, supports local food sovereignty, \nrewards care and commitment. This budget invests in teachers, caregivers, creatives and \ncitizens. This budget says no to unsustainable consumption. This budget says yes to economic \njustice so that all Mauritians, especially our youth feel included. As de Villepin writes – \n\n33 \n \n« La vie devient marchandise, vidée de son mystère. » \nAs Villepin writes – \n« La vie devient marchandise, vidée de son mystère. »  \nLife becomes a commodity, stripped of its mystery.  \nLet us not allow our policies to become the same. We must give our children reasons to \nstay and our elders’ reasons to trust. Let this Parliament restores that presence. Let us lift our \ncountry morally as well as materially. \nMadam Speaker, let me now get to the how. This Government is doing just that by \nbuilding a bridge to the future through a Multiannual Financial Framework, with three \ncomponents – \n(1) \na three-year macroeconomic financial consolidation plan; \n(2) \na social compassion pact, and  \n(3) \na productive growth roadmap. \nMadam Speaker, let me begin with the three-year fiscal consolidation plan that has five \nenablers – \n(1) \nReduce debt from 90% to 80%. \n(2) \nReform tax architecture for taxation equity. \nI would like to ask a question to the House. Do you know, over the past ten years, \nwhat has been the effective taxation rates of some industry sectors, such as hotels, \ntourism, banking insurance? You may be shocked! It begins at 5% because they \nintroduced so many taxation allowances in the economy. That was their effective \ntaxation rate. On the other hand, the common public was paying income tax, \nVAT, CSG tax, devaluation tax, inflation tax.  It is this equity that we have tried \nto bring through Fair Share Contributions. \n(3) \nWe need to find efficiencies of at least Rs5 billion over the next three years in \npublic bodies. \n\n34 \n \n(4) \nThis budget has made a provision of 15 billion to manage ESG (Environment, \nSocial and Governance) Risks. \nOn the social front, we have provision for adequate funding of the institutions for \nfighting drugs. This is a welcomed change for families that suffered for far too \nlong, with the previous government turning a blind eye to their misery.  \nThis budget has taken major steps towards good governance. \n(5) \nThis budget has made provision to manage macro financial risks due to internal \nand external shocks.  \nAs we all know, we live in an unpredictable world with country wars, tariff wars \nand trade wars. We need to securitise our supply chains and expand to new \nmarkets. This budget allocates funding to institutions to make Mauritius a safe \nand competitive haven.  \nMadam Speaker, we chose not to increase VAT rates because our fiscal consolidation \nplan is rooted in social justice. We will return to a lighter tax policy in 2-3 years. \nMadam Speaker, allow me to delve into the second pillar of our Multiannual Financial \nFramework – social compassion. With the provisioning of Rs428 billion over three years on \neducation, health, housing and social security, our workers’ centric values of the Labour \nParty, MMM, ReA and Nouveaux Démocrates ensure that the financial sustainability and \nequity of our welfare state for the next generations are protected. As such, pension reforms \nare necessary to ensure multi-generational pension sustainability. A commission of experts is \ncalled upon to propose a financially viable and ring fenced NPF 2.0. \nMadam Speaker, the budget has made provision for a number of social pacts. But in the \ninterest of time, I will move to the third pillar of the Multiannual Financial Framework – \ngrowth, based on six multiplies – \n(1) \nStructural economic reforms. For example, ease of doing business, external \ncompetitiveness and labour market reforms. \n(2) \nPort, airport, digital, financial and diplomatic connectivity as force multiplies. \n\n35 \n \n(3) \nThe resilience of existing contributing sectors. For example, construction, \nfinancial services and tourism. \n(4) \nThe recovery of stagnating sectors. For example, local production. \n(5) \nInnovative Mauritius for new economic pillars such as digital, AI, green and blue \nindustrialisation and Agri-resilience. \n(6) \nThe Future Fund as an investment catalyst. \nMadam Speaker, we are bringing all these opportunities to Mauritius so that our \nchildren stay in Mauritius and do not emigrate outside. We are confident that the Multiannual \nFinancial Framework will yield the macro financial results in the next 2-3 years.   \nLet us return to the why, as I prepare to conclude. Allow me to share a vision. Picture a \nless young version of me walking along the Péreybère Beach in 2050. I see multi generations \nof Mauritians with smiles on their faces: children, the youth, women, parents, and \ngrandparents. I look at them, I smile and perhaps, think, if only they knew how the 2025-\n2026 Budget was a watershed moment. The Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister-\nled Government, in which I was Junior Minister of Finance, brought reforms of the century: \nthe pension reforms and the structural economic reforms. The two leaders tried to mend a \nbroken social system. They dared to challenge the status quo. Think of Mahatma Gandhi, \nNelson Mandela, Martin Luther King, and Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam. They all have one \nthing in common: people/generations enjoy the benefits of their decisions for decades, for \ncenturies.  \nOn a personal note, both their direction and guidance are forging my character, courage \nand conviction. Working with the Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister is a lifelong \njourney of learning. Like all the members of this Government, I am deeply touched and \ninspired by a statement of the Prime Minister in a recent interview: ‘I don’t want anybody \nelse to carry this burden. I accept my fate of going through tough times again to build a \nbridge for the next generation.’ That is leadership! Hon. Prime Minister, hon. Deputy Prime \nMinister and members of the Government, thank you for your support.  \nMadam Speaker, this is very important. I always finish with a call to action. So, Madam \nSpeaker, in conclusion, allow me to make a call for national wisdom. In the words of Shri \n\n36 \n \nNarendra Modi, the Prime Minister of India, who captures the spirit of responsibility and \nrenewal so beautifully – \n“The country has such a government today which is devoting every moment of the time \nand every [rupee] of the people's money for the balanced development of the country; \nfor Sarvajan Hitaya: Sarvajan Sukhaya.” \nA Sanskrit phrase meaning, for the welfare of all, for the happiness of all. \n“The pride of my government and my countrymen is connected to one thing, that our \nevery decision, our every direction is linked to just one yardstick, that is, ‘Nation First’. \nAnd ‘Nation First’, is going to produce far-reaching and positive results.” \nMadam Speaker, we have made a tryst with destiny as one people, as one nation, in \npeace, justice and liberty. We are building the bridge to the future. Let us now make a pledge \nto build an innovative Mauritius.  \nWith this, I commend the Bill the House. Long live our motherland! Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: It seems to me that it would be wise to suspend now. So, I suspend \nthe Sitting for one and a half hour. \nAt 12.46 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.24 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Please be seated!  \nHon. Attorney General! \nThe Attorney General (Mr G. Glover, SC): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as we draw to \nthe end of this long session of speeches on the budget, it befalls me as the only non-elected \nMember of the House to make my voice heard. Do not expect me to lambast the previous \ngovernment for their clear failings or dissect the inaccuracies and I am being very polite, the \ninaccuracies of the accusations laid at the door of this government. However, it is my duty to \nensure that some misplaced criticisms are explained away. The first one regards the inexact \ninterpretation of the allowances paid to Junior Ministers. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as per \nparagraph 48 of the Annex to the Budget 2025-2026, it is provided that and I quote – \n\n37 \n \n“The National Assembly Allowances Act will be amended to cater for the payment of \nallowances to Junior Ministers. The amendments will be deemed to be effective as from \n22th November 2024.” \nEveryone including the two, there’s no one here, but including the two or maybe now three \nMembers of the Opposition know perfectly well what the law provides in terms of allowances \nfor every Member of this House. Section 2(4) of the National Assembly Allowances Act \nmakes provisions for allowances to be payable to the Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister, \nMinisters, Parliamentary Private Secretaries, the Leader of the Opposition, including \nMembers of the Opposition as well as for Junior Ministers. \nHowever, the only omission, with regards to Junior Ministers, is the amount of \nallowances payable to them. Therefore, since Junior Ministers have replaced Parliamentary \nPrivate Secretaries, they have been earning the same allowances as the PPS would have and \nnot a single cent more. Amendments will be brought to only cure an anomaly in the National \nAssembly Allowances Act, nothing more, nothing less. And those who have been wallowing \nin a deliberate misinterpretation of the Annex to the Budget on this question, are not true \npatriots. Every Member of this House has a sacred duty to tell the truth and nothing but the \ntruth. To continue to make statements that create misconceptions and put doubts in the heads \nof many, is just an irresponsible behaviour.  \nNow, of course, in light of what we have heard of the past regime, maybe we would not \nbe that surprised of the callous attitude of those sitting on the other side of the House. Call it \nnaïve but I thought when I accepted to sit here that we would all to the best of our ability and \ncompetence, properly ensure that the population is not misguided. I was obviously wrong. Let \nus therefore move on. In the hope that the nonsense will stop sooner than later. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the second point I will make here today concerns the pensions \nof retiring Members – those persons who are no longer Members of the Assembly. We have \nheard for calls from outside the House, for those who are benefiting from a pension to forego \ntheir pension and this, in a bid to convince the people that they too are taking or not, just like \nall those who will be affected by the reform of the old age pension. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it should be noted that the pensions of ex-members of this \nAssembly are governed by the National Assembly (Retiring Allowances) Act of 1976. An ex-\nmember will be eligible to pension if he has served as a Member for at least two terms. \nHowever, when an ex-member is elected again as a Member of the Assembly, he shall seize \n\n38 \n \nto be paid that pension but will in lieu be paid his allowance as a Member of the Assembly \nand in case his allowance as a Member is less than the pension he was earning, that Member \nwill be paid the difference between the pension and his allowance.  \nSo, today the Prime Minister, the Deputy Prime Minister do not obtain that pension. \nIndeed, the Leader of the Opposition also does not receive his pension as former \nparliamentarians because at this moment in time, they earn more in their respective capacities \nthan they would be earning as simple ex-parliamentarians.  \nMoreover, I will fail in my duty if I don’t remind Members of the Assembly, especially \none particular Member who is absent this afternoon, that one does not need to serve a whole \nterm of five years to be eligible for that pension. If, for example one has served as a speaker, \nalbeit not being elected Member of the Assembly and that only for some months, that person \nis eligible for that pension, albeit proportionately. \nMembers of the other side of this House know all this and have kept quiet, again, \nallowing the people to think that this was a big deal, it is not. And then why have we not \nheard those ex-parliamentarians who are not sitting in the House today, come out and say \npublicly that they are for this measure? The question why remains unanswered. This constant \nmanner of hiding things, allowing the people to live in a state of incomprehension is a crying \nshame and should be stopped. As I said, we have a sacred duty in this House and it befalls \nme, the only non-elected Member to have to say so. \nThe third point, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, relates to the economy in general. I confess I \nam no expert in the matter, but I do have some neurons that permit me to gage who might be \ntelling the truth and who might not be. To do so, it is appropriate, is it not, to rely on \nindependent views and opinions, to look, listen and learn from those in the loop who have \nbeen publicly saying what is the state of the economy and what are the obvious reforms that \nare needed. Let me say this – Moody’s is not, as its name might erroneously convey, a person \nacting on his own whims and caprices. It acts on hard undisputed facts. So, does the World \nBank and so does any other financial institution for that matter. It’s simple: if your earnings, \nwhoever you are, do not permit it, you will not be granted banking facilities.  \nSimilarly, what this government has been harping on, is what that we have reached the \nred line. Going over the red line would mean absolute chaos. Those who are today calling this \nGovernment unpatriotic and will then have to deal with rising prices and complete havoc. It \nseems some are under the impression in Mauritius that there is a God who is looking \n\n39 \n \nespecially after us, Mauritians, ready to save us from the excesses and failings of the previous \nregime and that nothing bad can happen to us as a nation. Tou pou korek! To those I say: \nwake up! This is not reality; this is an illusion which we have been made to believe in. The \nquicker you realise that, the better for all of us. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me now turn to the place of my Office in this budget. I will \nbegin with the figure Rs350 million. Yes, only millions; I am not talking of billions here. That \nis the allocation made to the Attorney General’s Office. Out of 47 budgetary heads, we \nranked 35th in terms of size, a relatively modest share and yet, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, our \nrole is anything but minor. My Office is the constitutionally compass of the Executive. It is \nthe principal legal advisor to the Government of Mauritius; it drafts legislation, represents the \npublic interest in litigation and underpins the entire legal and institutional architecture of the \nState. Its work touches every branch of Government and every citizen who looks to the law \nfor protection, resolution or redress. This work may not cost a lot to the taxpayer, but it is \nabsolutely essential, which reminds us that the capacity of institution does not depend on \nbudgets alone, it depends on the clarity of the mission they are given and the hard work of its \nmembers to meet their objectives.  \nThis budget, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, calls on all of us to do better without much more \nin terms of means. For the whole Government, this implies making smart choices and doing \naway with wastage.  \nFor the justice sector, this means putting the citizen at the centre of our reform. At the \nAttorney General’s Office, we are not merely updating legal texts; we are working to ensure \nthe justice is fair, comprehensible and accessible to all and not just in principle, but also in \npractice.  \nThe Government Programme 2025-2029 sets out a bold institutional agenda over the \nnext four years. We are tasked at my Office to translate that vision into law and much of our \nwork is already in progress. Let me set the picture clearly: since December of last year, 17 \nBills have already been introduced in this Assembly. Some major pieces of legislation such as \nthe Bail (Amendment) Act, the Financial Crimes Commission (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act \nand the Representation of the People (Amendment) Act which form part of a wider renewal \nof constitutional and democratic safeguards have already been passed by this Assembly.  \nTwo further Bills are now ready for debate in the Assembly. The Revenue Appeal \nTribunal Bill will replace the Assessment Review Committee with a permanent independent \n\n40 \n \ntribunal enhancing transparency, efficiency and fairness in tax matters. The Legal Aid and \nLegal Assistant Bill will overhaul the 1973 framework, expanding eligibility, simplifying \nprocedures and opening up of access to justice to those who need it most. Other reforms are \nalso in progress and six of the Bills are in the phase of finalisation and will be introduced in \nthe days coming such as the Civil Appeal Bill, the Criminal Appeal and Criminal Review \nBill, with the objective to clarify appellant roots, reduce procedural complexities and ensure \nthat litigants understand the path that lies ahead of them, whether they are victims, defendants \nor parties in a civil dispute. \nLast, but not least, the Courts Act will be amended with a view to simplifying and \nstreamlining the procedure for an application for judicial review. The Mauritius Citizenship \n(Amendment) Bill is also expected shortly, as part of the broad effort, to align citizenship law \nwith evolving legal and democratic realities. This will include doing away with the arbitrary \npowers introduced by the former government including what has been termed ‘Hoffman law’. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, all this legislative work is not abstract; it touches real people – \npeople seeking bail, people navigating tax disputes, people trying to appeal or defend \nthemselves, people challenging quasi-judicial decisions affecting their rights. It may be \nlegislation not for the headlines of newspapers but for the real change in people’s lives. So, \none step at a time, as I often say. It reflects our view that laws must be made, not only to \ngovern, but above all, to serve.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the hon. Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, was right in \nhis budget speech to describe the judiciary as an essential pillar of our democracy. The courts \nare not only there to resolve disputes; they are sentinels of our Constitution – protecting \nrights, ensuring accountability and keeping part within lawful bounds.  \nIn that spirit, this budget, makes a deliberate and targeted investment in the working \ntools of justice.  \nFirst, to improve how cases are handled and judgments are delivered, a dedicated \njudiciary e-system will be introduced, first for the Chambers matters and then at the registry \nof the Supreme Court. This is a long-awaited development that will help reduce delay and \nimprove access to information across the system.  \nSecond, Rodrigues will see the introduction of a Judicial Court recording and video \nconferencing system, ensuring that remoteness is no longer a barrier to judicial effectiveness \nor procedural fairness.  \n\n41 \n \nIndeed, the physical environment of justice is not being neglected. This budget makes \nprovision for the renovation of the old Supreme Court building, the rehabilitation of the \ntimber roof at the Flacq District Court and a new system enabling online payment of court \nfees and fines which will simplify daily interactions between citizens and the judicial system.  \nThese are only the first steps. By the end of its mandate, this government will need to \nhave invested in the rehabilitation of other District Courts, their infrastructures have been left \nin a state of decay. For too long, the general public has been left to see falling standards in \nour system being mirrored in the leaky roofs, crammed corridors, cracked benches of our \ncourt rooms and the infamous failings of the air conditioning systems.  \nThird, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the foundations of institutional justice are being \nreinforced. A National Crime Agency will be created to bolster investigative capabilities \nacross complex, cross-border and organised criminal offenses. And, critically, a new \nprosecution service will be established under the leadership of the Director of Public \nProsecutions, without prejudice to his prerogatives. This will follow the structure of The \nCrown Prosecution Service in the UK but tailored to our own local needs and reinforce the \nindependence of prosecutorial functions.  \nAt the same time, a Constitutional Review Commission is expected to commence its \nwork in the coming weeks. Its mission will be central to the accomplishments of this \ngovernment. Its success or failure will determine the long-term credibility of our institutional \nreforms. It will allow for a principle and inclusive review of our Constitution, with a view to \nstrengthen checks and balances and reinforcing public trust, from electoral reform to a new \ngeneration of rights, drafted by Mauritians for Mauritians, and passed by a Parliament with a \nclear mandate to do so. It will usher in a new chapter of our progress as an independent \nnation.  \nThese constitutional reforms, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, will be accompanied by other \nnovelties which will change how citizens interact with government. A freedom of \ninformation law will allow greater transparency and accountability in public administration. \nA framework for the Public Interest Litigation will also be developed aligning matters of \nbroad societal concerns to be brought before the courts with fewer procedural barriers.  \nAt the same time, the office of the DPP will be supported as the apex prosecutorial \nauthority. Bodies such as the Public Service Commission, will see adjustments to their \nstatutes to ensure efficiency and freedom from political interference.  \n\n42 \n \nThe guiding philosophy therefore, is restoring public trust, restoring constitutional \nbalance and restoring the citizens at the centre of the legal system. This is the spirit in which \nchange is being pursued, not for partisan game, not to be popular, but to rebuild methodically \nand durably the legal order on which our democracy depends.  \nAll these reforms, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, legislative, institutional, procedural, \ninfrastructural, indeed point towards a nation built upon the rule of law, with a justice system \nthat is both efficient and fair.  My office will continue to play its role in that process, quietly, \nbut with determination and we will support to work with Parliament with well-drafted \nlegislation. We will advise government independently and in good faith. And, we will work \nwith the judiciary to ensure that the architecture of justice, in all its components, improves.  \nThat, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, is why I support this budget. It is not an exercise in \nspending to please. It is an exercise in restoring sense and the restoration of public \nconfidence, in our courts, in the prosecutions, in our court procedure and in the inherent \nfairness of our democracy. And, this is perhaps, the most vital project of all. \n Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you! \nHon. Minister Subron.  \n(2.43 p.m.) \nThe Ministry of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity (Mr A. Subron): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this budget is being debated in a particular moment. We \nare at crossroads at global and planetary level. We are living in defining times and moment \nfor humanity, the planet and the people of Mauritius. We might even say, we are living in \nexistential times.  \nThis budget is being debated while the world may be at the eve of World War III, with \nnuclear exchange back on the agenda, after the end of the Cold War in the 1990s. This is the \nfirst real existential crisis facing humanity since this time.  \nThis budget is also being debated in times of ecological crisis when almost all that is \ncalled the ecological boundaries, have been crossed. Climate boundaries, being one of the \ncritical boundaries, have also been crossed.  \n\n43 \n \nAll the worst scenarios are now on the table. We are living in Anthropocene epoch, a \nnew geological time when the very existence of human society and civilisation is a stake. \nThis is the second existential crisis we are into, as a society part of planet earth, in crisis.  \nThe third global crisis is the crisis of resource and wealth grabbing. Ten men possess \nthe equivalent of 50% of wealth of the humanity. This is not an existential one but a social, \npolitical time-bomb upon which many societies are sitting.  \nTo conclude on this introduction, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as everyone knows, war \neven if it does not result in nuclear exchanges, together with the eruption of ecological \ndisasters every day on the planet, generates in parallel other serious crisis; be it economic, \nsocial and political. \nIt is worth mentioning that almost all human societies, including Mauritius are now \nfully embedded within global capitalism. This is not an ideological position, but an objective \nfact upon which we act in policy making.  \nThis Government has a triple objective and agenda – \n1. Bringing democratic, electoral and constitutional reforms, as highlighted by my \ncolleague, the hon. Attorney-General;  \n2. Integrating rights of nature within the Constitution and judicial framework, and  \n3. In parallel, establishing socioeconomic model within a new economic and social \norder in rupture with the prevailing model.  \nThis is an ambitious agenda. \nTo ensure transformation and progressive social and economic reforms, I would add \necological order as a new social contract is of utmost necessity. Consensus building is critical. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we, in the Alliance du Changement, have won a formidable landslide \nelectoral victory, but we have not yet succeeded in building a new social contract, social \ndialogue with inclusiveness and participatory democracy. This budget and the measures \ncontained in it will be our litmus test in defining whether we will be able to forge this new \nsocial contract and new social consensus. \nThis budget, mainly its proposal to raise the age of eligibility of old age pension from \n60 to 65 years, has raised genuine and healthy concerns by Mauritians. We respect the \ngenuine concerns and protests it generated last Saturday. The structures we have set up, that \nis, the two ministerial committees and other potential spaces should aim at understanding the \n\n44 \n \ngenuine and healthy concern of many citizens – workers, women, the poor people, the youth \nand the small-scale producers and operators.  \nBut at the same time, we have to strongly oppose some opportunists, the previous MSM \nregime, and some economic squatters who are sliding on this genuine social concern to \npromote their own political and economic greed agenda. They are the ones responsible of the \nsocioeconomic and indebtment crisis upon which this Government has had to act in this \nbudget.  \nI also regret the maladie infantile, I must say, obsession infantile, of a tiny few trade \nunionists – I need not to mention them here – against me and Rezistans ek Alternativ over the \nrecent weeks. As if their first objective was to discredit me and Rezistans ek Alternativ, not to \nchange the pension reform! Be it as it may, in the times of multiple crisis at global and local \nlevel, successful governance means co-evolving in dialectics with social contradictions and \nsocial protests. This is and will be the challenge of this Government. I must say that there are \nalready significant acts in this direction by our Government. \nBesides promptly responding with the setting up of two interministerial committees, \nthis Government, and in particular, the hon. Prime Minister, promptly reacted to ensure that \nthe social protests scheduled by the trade union movement not be interdicted by the \nsabotaging act of an MSM nominee who wanted to deny the access of Champs de Mars to the \nunions.  \nThis was almost a social blaspheme as the Champ de Mars, besides being the historical \nhorseracing track of so many generations of Mauritians and of my colleagues, is also the \ncradle of the working-class struggle in Mauritius. The Labour Party was born in 1936 there, \nand the first Labour Day was celebrated in 1938 there.   \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me briefly give an outline. I will not repeat what my \ncolleagues and hon. Members of the majority have said, and which I fully agree with. This \nbudget, on one hand, proposes new framework to optimise and sustain our commons, that is, \nland – mainly, agricultural land and ocean.  \nThis budget proposes a pathway for energy security as well as a massive transition to \nrenewable energy with some elements of people’s-led production with Agri solar farms. This \nbudget proposes to make innovation and knowledge a pillar of the future Mauritius. This \nbudget proposes a shift from focus on estate property and rancher capitalism to a more \nproduction-based investment.  \n\n45 \n \nOn the other hand, this budget proposes a rupture in fiscal and tax regime prevailing for \nmore than 20 to 25 years to introduce new tax on the rich, including on dividends and \nsegments of capitalist class to ensure a fair share contribution. Even if this fiscal regime is for \nthree years, this shift should be commended and cannot be denied by socialists and the union \nmovement. In parallel, this budget is proposing a substantial pension reform to raise the year \nof eligibility of BRP from 60 to 65 years. \nThe above significant policy measures have been justified on the basis of the State of \nthe Economy Report, the level of indebtedness of our country and the long-term sustainability \nof the pension system in Mauritius.  \nLet me recap the history and evolution of the pension system in Mauritius. First, we had \nthe slavery and indentured labourers when pensions did not exist. People were only needed \nfor their courage and labour force. The first pension, as I mentioned when replying to the \nPNQ of the hon. Leader of the Opposition, came in 1956 with the birth of old-age pension. \nFrom the social unrest of 1937 and 1943, it was the product of the struggle of the \nLabour Party, and the first generation of working-class struggle and trade unions. The second \nmoment is the post-independence era, 1976 and 1978, where the National Pension Scheme, a \npublic contributory system, despite fear and opposition from the sugar oligarchy, the rich and \nthe middle class at the time, was enacted by this Parliament. \nThe National Pension Scheme provided a widespread coverage of a contributory benefit \nas well as non-contributory benefit. This was part of the emerging post-independence welfare \nstate. The very welfare state that some people supposedly intend to defend now. The pension \nsystem, the NPS, was supposed to be enhanced as there were a lot of impediments due to the \nobjection of the rich class lobby at the time. Maybe some people can get access – I will not \nread it because of time constraint – to the Hansards when the National Pension Scheme was \nenacted in 1976. There is a lot of knowledge in understanding the whole pension system in \nMauritius. \nThe next historical moment was in 2008, when a reform of the retirement age, old \npension benefits and the age of entitlement was proposed. The unions and the people of \nMauritius raised concerns at the time. They protested. Finally, a social pact was concluded. \nThe age of retirement was raised to 65, but old-age pension’s eligibility was maintained at 60 \nyears as well as the right of any employee to retire on optional basis at the age of 60 and be \n\n46 \n \nentitled to retirement benefit under the previous labour law. They were also entitled to reduce \npension under the National Pension Scheme at 60 years. \nThen came 2020. 2020, while the people were bleeding under COVID-19, a series of \ncrime was committed by the then government and Dr. Padayachy, the ex-Finance Minister of \nthe previous government. \nFirst, they abolished the National Pension Scheme. It was not in their manifesto; \nanybody can go and read. All of the MSM people who were on the street should have brought \ntheir manifesto and shown to the people what was written and not written in their manifesto \nin 2019. So, they abolished the National Pension Scheme comme un trait de plume.  \nIn parallel, they created the MIC for big corporates and their cronies. They subsidised \nof all the corporates and gave more than Rs21 billion of the public funds to the corporates. \nThese are the figures that I obtained as a trade unionist when I was not in the Alliance du \nChangement. Alongside, the insatiable greed took over and with all the tenders and contracts \ndilapidating public money while the people were bleeding. \nWhile they dismantled the National Pension Scheme, many employees were receiving \nsome Rs5000 of pension per month. So, they decided to stop it for the next two, three, four, \nfive generations. This was a crime. I have figures where categories of employees were \nreceiving even a higher pension at the time. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, they dismantled the National Pension Scheme and set up the \nfamous CSG. They are based on erroneous assessment. They said that National Pension Fund \nwas not sustainable. This was far from reality. The reality, like I said last time, is that the \nNational Pension Fund, now after the abolition of contributions in five years has been paying \ncontribution of around Rs200 billion to all employees who were part of the National Pension \nScheme. \nSo, the contribution was abolished and the Rs20 billion is coming from benefits derived \nfrom investment of the National Pension Fund. So, imagine what the size of the National \nPension Fund would have been, had they not dismantled the National Pension Scheme in \n2022. As I said, and my officers have now testified, that they said that they wanted the \nNational Pension Fund to pay the Rs4500 that they promised in the election 2019 and they \ntried to force officers in my office to pay Rs4000 from the National Pension Scheme and \nofficers in my office said that this is not possible because the National Pension Scheme has \ncontributing members and what need to be paid has to be paid to contributing members and \n\n47 \n \nnot to non-members of the Fund and this is where Dr. Padayachy got angry and he decided to \neliminate the National Pension Scheme. As I said, this was a treason at the time. \nIn fact, I think we need to reflect what happened in this bleeding moment. Not only did \nthey dismantle the National Pension Scheme but they created the CSG supposedly to pay the \nRs4500 that they promised in the election of 2019. But, in reality, the Basic Retirement \nPension is a tax-based pension, it is not a contributory based pension. It is a tax based, that is, \nyou pay the pension from tax collected and this is independent on the number of young \npeople or workers you have at any particular moment in time because it is tax-based. You can \nhave less people working but you have lots of wealth created. So, it is a tax based. In fact, \nwhat in reality happened, was that all the people of Mauritius were contributing to pay for the \nBRP by price increases, we were not only be bleeding by COVID-19, we were also bleeding \nby massive price increase between 2020 and 2024. This is how the BRP was paid. CSG was \nnot the only contributor to pay part of the BRP. They also used taxpayers’ money, indirect \ntax, to pay the BRP, the increase in the number of beneficiaries of the BRP. This is how the \nvolcano, the crisis has been generated.  \nThe present moment we are in, in the present moment and in this budget, this \nGovernment, our government has proposed a major pension reform. The core, not the only \nthe major part of it, is the eligibility to benefit the Basic Retirement Pension, long ago called \nOld Age Pension. Let me give some figures, it is my duty to give some figures. \nAs at June 2025, we have 272,033 beneficiaries of pensions. The amount paid as at \nJune 2025 is Rs55,323,000,000 for Financial Year 2024-2025. Second, I must add – this is \nbeing mentioned for the first time – that on top of the Basic Retirement Pension, there were \nRs1000 for all beneficiaries from 65 to 74 years old. This Rs1000 is being maintained in the \ncontext of the reform. \nIn addition, for all beneficiaries between 75 and above, there was a Rs2500 CSG \nretirement benefit. This too is being maintained and all the entitlement Rs1000 and all the \nentitlement of Rs2500 for our senior citizens, 800 and more, are being maintained and this \nmust be very clear to the Mauritians. \nSecondly, we need to understand that in 2019-2020, there was roughly, the budget \nspent was Rs20 billion and in 2024, the budget spent was more than Rs51 billion. This means \nthat there was an increase of more than 150% not to say 175% and this has to be taken on \nboard. \n\n48 \n \nLet me add, as mentioned in the budget, all Basic Invalid Pension (BIP) beneficiaries \nwill be paid pensions up to 65 years. According to figures I have, this will beneficiate some \n5856 persons with disability entitled to BIP. Also, all beneficiaries of Basic Widows \nPensions, they are a totalling of 6929 people, they will be beneficiating the Basic Widows \nPensions. I must also stress that as at date, nearly 40% of beneficiaries of BRP are in \nemployment. \nIn fact, our figures gave 39.66% in the first year, 61 years. In the second year, it is \n31.64%. In the third year, that is 63, it would be 28.57% and then 22% reaching 15% of the \nbeneficiaries are working. Most of the beneficiaries are from private sector and the rest of \nthem are from public sector. The reason given for this pension reform, apart from the state of \npublic debt is known. I will not repeat it; it is life expectancy and population growth \nprojection in the coming 50 to 100 years.  \nI must also stress, seeing some of these people on the street last Saturday, mainly Dr. \nPadayachy, the Leader of the Opposition, Pravind Jugnauth, that some of these people when \nthey were in Government, they themselves recommended the raising of eligibility for basic \nretirement pension from 60 to 65. This was part of a technical committee paper that they \nproduced where there were ten recommendations. Among the recommendations, the number \n10 recommendation, I read it – \n“10. To increase BRP eligibility age to 65 years.” \nThis is theirs. They should have brought it to Champ de Mars with them and distribute \nit to my fellow comrades of the trade unions. There are 10 recommendations, all of them \naimed at jeopardising the pension, the BRP or the eligibility of the BRP. This is their \ndocument, it is a document dated from a committee which met in 2016-2017, up to 17 March \n2017. So, the people need to know the real culprit. Now, we are the government of the \npeople, for the people. We have heard the public concerns and the genuine protests. This is \nwhy as I mentioned, two interministerial committees have been set up. The two ministerial \ncommittees – I must stress, from the Cabinet decision – are to look into possible support to \nthose persons aged between 60 and 65 years employed in sectors in difficult work conditions, \nand eventual means tested eligible housewives and mothers. This committee will be presided \nby the Prime Minister. The other one is under my chair and will look into possible support to \npersons in state of health-related inability to work.  \n\n49 \n \nI am pleased to inform the House that the second committee will be called on this \nWednesday to discuss and look into the possible support for people with health disabilities. \nThere is a possibility that the two committees merge to look into both terms of reference as \ndecided by the Cabinet but also to take onboard other concerns, other considerations raised \nby the people in Mauritius. I must also mention that in the budget, there is a small but \nimportant amendment to pension benefits. All people going abroad for medical purpose will \nbe able to stay 12 months instead of six months abroad and their basic pension will be \nmaintained. This is very important. In the budget, it is also mentioned that the medical board \n– the famous medical board that so many Mauritians complain about – will be transferred in \nhospital and further develop within the reform that the committee number 2 intends to \npropose to include disability benefits reform and the reform for people aged 60 to 65 who \ncannot work for health reasons.  \nLet me add a few words as Minister of Social Integration in Mauritius. As you know, I \nhave two portfolios; Minister of Social Security and Minister of Social Integration. And let \nme say at the very outset that the present House needs a snapshot of poverty situation in \nMauritius and based on the latest figures from Statistics Mauritius and the Poverty Analysis \nof 2023 published in 2025, on the basis of the 2023 relative poverty line of 12,378 for a one-\nadult member household and 20,200 for a household comprising two adults and two children, \nthere were an estimated 29,800 households for 101,900 persons in relative poverty in \nMauritius, representing 8.4% of the total population.  \nI think it is important for Members of this House to note that the report of poverty \nstated a very important fact, a very important analysis. It says that Government transfers, \nbasic pensions and other security benefits like social aid, free health services, education and \npublic transport play a key role in bringing down poverty. Without these transfers, the poverty \nrate would have been 36.4% instead of 7.3%, the actual poverty rate. Consequently, and this \nis very important for the nation to know, the number of poor households would have \nincreased from 29,800 to 148,500. So, this is why what we are discussing now – that is, the \nreform of the pension and the reform of the tax regime – is of prime importance. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me highlight some of the social benefits mentioned in the \nbudget. The Government, conscious of its role in providing support to the most vulnerable \nones, to this effect, an array of schemes is being provided for the Financial Year 2025-2026 to \neligible households of the SRM – \n\n50 \n \n \nRs500 million under the subsistence allowance providing support on a monthly \nbasis to 7,300 households; \n \nRs65 million under the Child Allowance Scheme to encourage 6,000 children \nmonthly to attend school; \n \nRs11.2 million under the School Premium Scheme to reward around 480 students \nwho succeeded in grade 9, SC, HSC and tertiary education; \n \nRs3 million under the Free Examination Scheme to support students to take a \nsecond attempt at SC and HSC; \n \nRs500,000 to around 50 students under the Waiving of Administration Fees \nScheme to follow full-time course at MITD and other recognised tertiary \ninstitutions; \n \nRs800 million under School Material Scheme to provide school materials, \nincluding bag, uniform, shoes, copybooks and stationaries to 12,400 student \nbeneficiaries; \n \nRs300,000 under the Crèche Scheme in respect of children aged between 3 \nmonths to 3 years as an incentive for their admission in a registered child daycare \ncentre, thereby allowing their mothers to take up employment or following a \ntraining course. \nLet me say that the NEF is high on the debate agenda. Let me remind the House that the \ntotal grant allocated to the National Empowerment Foundation has been increased to Rs267 \nmillion amounting to an approximate 5% increase. The fund dedicated to the National Social \nInclusion Foundation has also been increased to Rs1.3 billion. As of today, some 530 NGOs \nand non-profit organisations are registered with the NEF. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me conclude now by saying a few political words. My \nParty and myself have been the target of harsh protests these recent months, especially during \nthe recent week. We do understand their views for we are one of the symbols of the working \npeople and social justice in this country. In a sense, being the target is commensurate to the \nvalues and programmes we defend.  \nLet me reassure the people that we have decided to be part of the Alliance du \nChangement for the following reasons – \n\n51 \n \n(1) \nTo get rid of the MSM and its ‘mafiosization’ practices during its reign. We have \nsucceeded 50% of our mission in the last general elections. \n(2) \nI would say the other quarter of our addition to the alliance is to bring \nfundamental democratic, electoral, ecological reforms within our Constitution, \nwhich will be a legacy for our children for the next 50 years. \n(3) \nThe last quarter, the 25% remaining, is to govern and apply the best policies, \nespecially the socio-economic ones in favour of citizens, workers, pensioners and \nthe youth. Our aim in deciding such policies is the immediate and long-term \ninterests of the social class.  \nAs stated, Rezistans ek Alternativ promote, to the best way that we can, inclusiveness and \nparticipatory democracy in defining the socio-economic policies. \nDuring the last weeks of social turmoil, I have met and have had conversation – many \npeople do not know – with almost all the leaders of the trade union movement and many in \nthe civil society movement in Constituency No. 4, and in various regions of the country. \nDespite all, let me say it loudly, none of them want Rezistans ek Alternativ to quit this \nalliance. We are here and we will stay in this alliance to meet our objectives! \n Many of us have witnessed attempts to explode this alliance. They have all failed. Now \nthat some of us are not on the streets, we will defend to the best that we can our point of \nviews, our values and the people’s interests within the Government as long as we can. The \nbutterflies are flying alongside the people as well as alongside the key of the Labour Party, \nthe heart of the MMM and the freedom tree of the ND.  \nMay peace, justice and liberty prevail in this critical time we are living. Thank you, Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister.  \nHon. Minister R. Duval! \nMr R. Duval: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I beg to move for the adjournment of the \ndebate. \nDr. Boolell rose and seconded. \n\n52 \n \nQuestion put and agreed to.  \nDebate adjourned accordingly. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister! \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I beg to move that this Assembly do \nnow adjourn to Wednesday 25 June 2025 at 3.00 p.m. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The House stands adjourned! \nAt 3.19 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Wednesday 25 June 2025 at \n3.00 p.m.",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-24-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/573",
      "sitting_id": "24-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-24",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 573,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/573) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to public beaches, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to \nthe number of reported cases of assault having occurred thereat since January 2025 to date, \nindicating – \n(a) \nthe Police Stations where same were reported; \n(b) \nthe number thereof having occurred during weekends and public holidays, \nrespectively, and \n(c) \nwhere matters stand as to the inquiries carried out thereinto, including the \nnumber of arrests effected in connection therewith, if any.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed by the Commissioner of Police that since January 2025 to 19 June of this year, 14 \ncases of assault at 11 different public beaches have been reported at ten different police \nstations. I am tabling the details thereof. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am further informed that among the 14 cases \nreported, four occurred during weekends at Flic-en-Flac, Tombeau Bay, St Felix, and Baie du \nCap Public Beaches, and two cases during public holidays at Mont Choisy, and Tombeau \nBay, respectively. \nIn two cases, nine suspects were arrested and provisionally charged for the offence of \nAssault with Premeditation. Inquiries in all the 14 cases are ongoing. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Babajee: Will the hon. Prime Minister consider getting some officers from the \nSMF and SSU at public beaches on weekends due to the number of assaults being occurred \nand the short number of Policemen? \nThe Prime Minister: Yes. In fact, this is being done during night time, especially. Both \nthe Police presence, together with the SMF, SSU and local Police conduct road blocks, \nvehicle check points, and targeted alcohol and drug operations along the coastal roads. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, one more!  \n\n24 \n \nMr Babajee: Will the hon. Prime Minister consider having traffic management officers \non the Flic-en-Flac Road, especially, as we have four to five hotels; having delays during the \nweekend, with a huge number of traffic coming from Flic-en-Flac to Palma, in direction to \nthe airport. \nThe Prime Minister: That is a different question. It does not pertain to the question. \nBut, yes, this is also being done. \nMadam Speaker: Alright! So, now, hon. Babajee, your PQ to hon. Ministers! \nCONTRACT CAR LICENCES – CRITERIA, PROCESS & BENEFICIARIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-24-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/574",
      "sitting_id": "24-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-24",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 574,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/574) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to Public Service Vehicle (Contract Car) \nLicence, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport \nAuthority, information as to the number thereof issued over the past ten years, indicating – \n(a) \nthe number thereof issued for operation in hotels and tour operators; \n(b) \nthe procedure followed therefor, and \n(c) \nif all the beneficiaries thereof – \n(i) \nsatisfied all the eligibility criteria, and \n(ii) \nproduced all the required documents.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the NLTA that out of the \nexisting fleet of 11,153 contract car licences to date, 7,781 representing 70%, have been \ngranted during the last 10 years.  \nPrior to 2014, we only had 3,372 contract car licences which in itself reflects the strict \nand cautious approach to the issue of such licences. \nFrom information gathered from the NLTA, there is no indication that a survey was \nconducted as regards to the demand and real need for such services on the market.  \nAs regard to part (b) of the question, I am made to understand by the NLTA that it does \nnot have any record of the licences issued as to who has recommended the contract car \napplications. Hence, no information is currently readily available as to the number of contract \ncar licences issued for operations in hotels and tour operators. Extracting this information \nfrom over 11,000 files may be time consuming at this stage.  \n\n25 \n \n \nHowever, I wish to reassure the House that I have vehemently condemned this \nsituation. I have already instructed the NLTA to henceforth ensure proper recordkeeping \nwhilst favouring the adoption of digitalisation prospects thereto so as to enable information \non the recommendations of such applications to be obtained at one click. \nComing to part (b) of the question, Madam Speaker, I am tabling information relating \nto the procedures, in the interest of time.  \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (c) of the question, the NLTA has confirmed that \nall beneficiaries did satisfy all the eligibility criteria and that they produced all the required \ndocuments when they were assessed by the then licensing board. I am also informed that as \nfrom 26 July 2024, the criteria for submission of application for contract cars was \nsignificantly eased in spite of the fact that the NLTA was already receiving a large number of \napplications monthly. \nIn that context, the supporting documents were acceptable even from greenhouses, as \ncompared to hotels and tour operators previously. New applications did not require the \nsubmission of documents on parking facilities. No bank statement was required to prove \nfinancial capacity. No enquiry was carried out by the NLTA inspectorate to assess the need \nfor the applied licences.  \nI am made to understand that Certificates of Character had to be produced only at the \nimplementation stage when the application has already been approved. This crucial document \nwas previously required prior to the application being considered by the licensing board! \nMoreover, during the same period these applications were decided upon by the then \nOfficer-in-Charge of the NLTA, although the licensing board was still operational. The NLTA \nAct clearly stipulates that this is the power of the licensing board to determine application for \ncontract car licences.  \nWithout any authority, this power was exercised by the then Officer-in-Charge. \nAccordingly, 138 car licences were granted during that said period. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. A. Duval! \nMr A. Duval: Thank you. May I ask the hon. Minister, with regard to the lack of \navailability of cars having the required licence as tour operators on the market, is the hon. \nMinister proposing to re-open applications for the supply of these licences? As the hon. \nMinister may know, insurances and tour operators are complaining that they are not finding \n\n26 \n \ncars to rent that are duly licensed. As you may know also, there is a growing black market for \ncars that are being rented and which do not afford the limitation of liability, etc. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Osman Mahomed: Thank you. Applications were received until about three weeks \nago. There was a deadline. I am given to understand that there are about 1,500 applications \nwhich the licensing board will starting hearing very soon. \nMadam Speaker: Okay.  \nNext question, hon. Babajee! \nCEB – EMPLOYEES RECRUITED (2015-2025)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-24-june-2025",
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/575",
      "sitting_id": "24-june-2025",
      "date": "2025-06-24",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 575,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/575) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the Central Electricity Board, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to the number of \nemployees recruited thereat over the past ten years.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, je suis informé par la Central Electricity Board \nque de janvier 2015 à ce jour, 1,153 employés ont été recrutés au sein de l’institution dans \ndivers grades techniques et administratifs.  \nParmi ceux-ci, 131 anciens employés du CEB (Green Energy) Co. Ltd et CEB \n(Facilities) Co. Ltd ont été intégrés respectivement en 2021 et 2023. \nSur l’ensemble de ces recrutements, 427 ont été effectués à la suite d’un appel à \ncandidature dans la presse. Toutefois, il est noté que 595 recrutements ont eu lieu sans aucune \nforme de transparence, dans une opacité totale. À ce jour, l’effectif de la CEB est passé de \n1,884 en 2015 à 2,312 en 2025, ce qui traduit une augmentation substantielle du personnel au \ncours des dix dernières années. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Babajee: Will the hon. Minister inform the House, Madam Speaker, if there will be \nan enquiry on the transparency of the recruitment? The recruitment, as you just said, has not \nbeen done in transparency. \nMr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, laissez-moi préciser qu’au-delà de cette hausse \nde l’effectif, il est impératif de souligner que ces dix dernières années, sous les mandats \n\n27 \n \nsuccessifs des anciens ministres, des pratiques de recrutement pour le moins douteuses ont été \nobservées.  \nC’est bien que les honorables membres ainsi que vous, Madame la présidente, prenez \nconnaissance de cela. Le plus préoccupant, c’est que des recrutements ont été effectués pour \ndes postes de techniciens qui demandent obligatoirement que vous ayez un NTC3. C’est un \nbrevet technique obligatoire pour travailler à la CEB. Donc, malheureusement, des \nrecrutements ont été effectués pour des postes de techniciens sans que les candidats disposent \ndu NTC3, ce qui est pourtant une qualification essentielle pour exercer cette fonction. \nIl est important de rappeler que le secteur de l’électricité est un domaine hautement \ntechnique où la sécurité des employés est enjeux. Une erreur, une seule négligence peut avoir \ndes conséquences dramatiques.  \nMadame la présidente, pour répondre à la question de l’honorable membre, cela \ntémoigne d’un grave disfonctionnement dans le processus de recrutement et des gestions de \nressources humaines au sein du CEB. Une telle approche où la compétence est exigée après \ncoûts est non seulement contraire aux pratiques élémentaires de bonne gestion mais aussi \ndangereuse. \nL’actuel Board du CEB a pris la décision depuis quelques temps d’offrir une dernière \nopportunité aux 23 techniciens recrutés sept ans de cela qui sont concernés, afin qu’ils \npuissent régulariser leur situation en obtenant un NTC3, ce qui est particulièrement grave, \nMadame la présidente, que sous la responsabilité de l’ancien ministre – suivez mon regard – \ncertains recrutements ont été faits avant même que les candidats n’aient acquis cette \ncertification de base, NTC3. Ce n’est qu’après le recrutement qu’il leur a été demandé d’aller \nsuivre une formation requise pour obtenir ce NTC3. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. Hon. Mr Babajee, your first question! \nHERITAGE CITY PROJECT – INDIA & SAUDI ARABI FUNDING – BIDS & \nPAYMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-24-june-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/576",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 576,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –  \n \nWhether, in regard to the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam \nInternational Airport, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from Airport Terminal Operations Ltd., information as \nto whether consideration will be given for the provision  \nthereat of (a) additional parking slots, roads and exit gates and \n(b) adequate directional signage on the parking areas of the \nOld Terminal, indicating the current use made thereof and  \nif same will be operational anew and, if so, when, giving details \nthereof?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/577",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 577,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –  \n \nWhether, in regard to homicide and violent-death, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of \nPolice, information as to the number of reported cases thereof \nsince November 2024 to date, indicating the (a) number thereof \nin which arrests were effected (b) number of suspects formally \ncharged and (c) measures envisaged to address the issue and \nreduce the occurrence thereof? \n \nCANCELLED\n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                          PAGE 2 of 16 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/578",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 578,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –  \n \nWhether, in regard to the proposed sale of MauBank Ltd. by the \noutgoing Government, he will state whether the services of a \nTransaction Advisor were retained to oversee same and, if so, \nindicate the names thereof and the terms and conditions of the \ncontract, including success fees or other remuneration \nstructures and the quantum thereof paid out thereto, if any, as \nat to date?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/579",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 579,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –  \n \nWhether, in regard to drugs, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Anti Narcotic and Customs Division of \nthe Mauritius Revenue Authority and the Anti-Drug Support \nUnit, information as to the quantity thereof seized at the ports \nand airports, respectively, since December 2024 to date, \nindicating the (a) value thereof in each case and (b) number of \ncases in which controlled delivery thereof resulted in the arrest \nof the local counterparts?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/580",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 580,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands \n \nWhether, in regard to official overseas missions undertaken by \nthe former Prime Minister, former Ministers and Members of \nParliament over the period 2015 to 2019 and 2020-2024, \nrespectively, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to the total cost incurred therefor, including the \ncost of airfares and per diem allowances? \n \n \n \nCANCELLED\n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                          PAGE 3 of 16 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/581",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 581,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands \n \nWhether, in regard to Mrs S.O.1, Attorney at Law, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to the total quantum \nof fees and allowances paid out thereto, together with the other \nfringe benefits to which she was entitled, over the period 2015 \nto 2024 in her capacity as legal representative, chairperson, \nboard member and any other legal services rendered to the \ndifferent Ministries and parastatal bodies?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/582",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 582,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –  \n \nWhether, in regard to the monthly allowance, gratuity and \nother benefits to which Advisers and Senior Advisers are \nentitled, he will state whether same have recently been revised, \nand, if so, indicate the (a) revised quantum thereof, whether in \ncash or in kind and (b) effective date thereof?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/583",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 583,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –  \n \nWhether, in regard to the Accounts of the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly, he will state (a) the measures and remedial actions, \nif any, taken to strengthen the governance and management of \npublic funds for budget transparency, accountability and \ncredibility thereof and (b) whether new guidelines have been \nissued for the reallocation and virement of funds, as \nrecommended in the Fourth Report of the Public Accounts \nCommittee of the Seventh National Assembly, and if so, give \ndetails thereof, and if not, why not? \n \n \n \n \nCANCELLED\n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                          PAGE 4 of 16 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/584",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 584,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –  \n \nWhether in regard to reward money, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, \ninformation as to the (a) quantum thereof allocated in each \nfinancial year to Police Officers over the past five years  \n(b) procedures followed therefor and (c) check and balance \nmechanism put in place to prevent abuse and illicit use thereof?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/585",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 585,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands– \n \nWhether, in regard to the use of bank cheques as a means of \npayment, he will state if consideration will be given for the \nphasing out thereof and, if so, when and, if not, why not?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/586",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 586,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –  \n \nWhether, in regard to Honourable Ministers and Junior \nMinisters, he will state, when travelling for official overseas \nmissions (a) the per diem rates to which they are entitled when \nproceeding to (i) the United Kingdom (ii) European Union \ncountries (iii) Switzerland and (iv) the United States of America \nand (b) whether they are entitled to (i) travelling in first or \nbusiness class and (ii) chauffeur-driven limousines in the \ncourse thereof at the cost of Government? \n \n \n \n \n \nCANCELLED\n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                          PAGE 5 of 16 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/587",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 587,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –  \n \nWhether, in regard to official overseas missions, he will state \nthe number thereof undertaken by Honourable Ministers, \nincluding himself and Junior Ministers, since November 2024 \nto date, indicating in each case the (a) purpose/s thereof  \n(b) composition of the accompanying delegation (c) countries \nvisited (d) duration and (e) total cost incurred, including cost \nof airfares, local transportation and per diem allowances?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/588",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 588,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –  \n \nWhether, in regard to the Lallmatie Police Station, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of \nPolice, information as to the (a) number of (i) Male and Women \nPolice Officers posted thereat and (ii) vehicles attached thereto \nand (b) extent of the premises thereof?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/589",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 589,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –  \n \nWhether, in regard to the Montagne Longue Police Station, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner \nof Police, information as to whether Police Officers posted \nthereat have recently been transferred, indicating whether \nmeasures have been taken to remedy the shortage of staff \nthereat? \n \n \nCANCELLED\n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                          PAGE 6 of 16 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/590",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 590,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands \n \nWhether, in regard to the joint UK-US military base located on \nDiego Garcia in the Chagos Archipelagos on which the Republic \nof Mauritius exercises its sovereignty, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain information as to whether same was used in \nthe recent air strikes launched against the Islamic Republic of \nIran? \n \n \nQuestions addressed to Honourable Ministers, other than to   \nDr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs \nand External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for \nRodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/591",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 591,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Housing and Lands – \n \nWhether, in regard to the land situated around the Waste \nWater Treatment Plant at Baie du Tombeau, he will state the \nreasons why his Ministry is pursuing the compulsory \nacquisition thereof for the proposed relocation of the Waste \nTransfer Station of Roche Bois thereat when the Ministry of \nEnvironment has not prepared and Government has not \napproved any such project?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/592",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 592,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and \nResearch – \n \nWhether, in regard to the University of Technology (UTM), he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information \nas to whether there are enrolment procedure issues of \nMalagasy students thereat and, if so, give details thereof, \nindicating in the case of  Miss R. F. F.2,  when (a) her application \nwas submitted to the UTM (b) the UTM submitted her visa \napplication to the Passport and Immigration Office and (c) the \nStudent Visa was issued? \n \nCANCELLED\n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                          PAGE 7 of 16 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/593",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 593,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Tourism – \n \nWhether, in regard to the recent accident that occurred in a \ndiving centre in the north of the island, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain information as to (a) whether an inquiry \nhas been carried out thereinto and the outcome thereof  \n(b) remedial actions taken, if any, in relation to the suspected \ncause thereof and (c) the measures taken, if any, to accompany \nfamily members of the victim thereof?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/594",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 594,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness – \n \nWhether, in regard to the public places, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the Sanitary Services, information as \nto whether rat infestation has been observed thereat and, if so, \nindicate if urgent remedial measures will be taken in relation \nthereto, including if consideration will be given for the \ncontracting out of the services to private rodent control service \nproviders?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/595",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 595,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and \nResearch – \n \nWhether, \nin \nregard \nto \nthe \nimplementation \nof \nthe \ninternationalisation of higher education, he will state the \nmeasures hitherto taken, as outlined in the Government \nProgramme 2025-2029?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/596",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 596,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness – \n \nWhether, in regard to the dispensary at Palma, he will state if \nconsideration will be given for the renovation or relocation \nthereof and, if so, indicate when, giving details thereof and, if \nnot, why not? \n \nCANCELLED\n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                          PAGE 8 of 16 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-march-2025",
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/597",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 597,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Local Government – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Mahebourg Waterfront, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether \nconsideration will be given for the (a) renovation thereof, \nespecially, of the damaged and closed steel jetty and  \n(b) reserved walking space thereof be secured against the \nhazards posed by cars and motorcycles driving through same?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/598",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 598,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of National Infrastructure – \n \nWhether, in regard to the proposed development of a Land \nDrainage Master Plan for Rodrigues, he will state where \nmatters stand?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/599",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 599,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Commerce and Consumer \nProtection – \n \nWhether, in regard to rice, flour and edible oil, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the State Trading Corporation \n(STC), information as to the quantity of retail sale thereof by the \nSTC in each case, indicating (a) the brand names under which \nsame are being sold and (b) whether consideration will be given \nfor the STC to run supermarkets or shops with a view to \nensuring affordable prices of such products to consumers?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/600",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 600,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness – \n \nWhether, in regard to the purchase of ventilators from Pack & \nBlisters during the COVID 19 pandemic, he will state (a) the \nquantum of public funds disbursed in connection therewith as \nat to date, giving a breakdown thereof and (b) if the matter has \nbeen referred to the Financial Crimes Commission for inquiry? \n \nCANCELLED\n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                          PAGE 9 of 16 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/601",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 601,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Local Government – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Morcellement St André Football \nGround, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information \nas to the (a) quantum of funds allocated for the upgrading \nthereof, more specifically for the lighting and fencing thereof \nand (b) expected start and completion dates thereof?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/602",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 602,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of National Infrastructure – \n \nWhether, in regard to the road from Cottage to Poudre d'Or \nHamlet, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nRoad Development Authority information as to whether \nconsideration will be given for the implementation of road \nsafety measures thereat, including the (a) installation of \npavements and handrails through compulsory acquisition of \nlands along the main roads to ensure pedestrian security and \n(b) widening thereof?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/603",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 603,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Information Technology, \n \nCommunication and Innovation –  \n \nWhether, in regard to the Mauritius Post Office in Rodrigues, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information \nas to (a) where matters stand as to the proposed installation of \na scanner thereat for drugs detection, indicating how same is \ncarried out presently in the absence thereof and (b) whether \nthe suspension of air shipment of packets and parcels to \nRodrigues has been waived?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/604",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 604,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Commerce and Consumer \nProtection – \n \nWhether, in regard to the number of vehicles equipped with \nAutogas kit using Liquid Petroleum Gas (LPG) as fuel decanted \nfrom cooking gas cylinders, he will state if consideration will be \ngiven to requesting local petroleum companies to equip their \nfuel stations with Autogas dispensers with a view to rendering \nthe exercise of filling vehicles with LPG safe and, if so, when, \nindicating the estimated cost per kg/litre thereof and, if not, \nwhy not? \nCANCELLED\n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                          PAGE 10 of 16 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/605",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 605,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Tourism – \n \nWhether, in regard to the official overseas missions funded by \nthe Mauritius Tourism Promotion Authority (MTPA) since 2014 \nto 2024, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nMTPA, information as to the number thereof in which  \nMr S.R.3 participated, giving a breakdown of the cost incurred in \nrelation thereto in each case?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/606",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 606,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations – \n \nWhether, in regard to motor vehicles and motorcycles, he will \ntable the list of premises where activities in connection with \nthe repair thereof were carried out over the period December \n2014 to November 2024, indicating the (a) number of \nworkplace inspections carried out thereat annually and  \n(b) names of the employers prosecuted for breaches of the  \nOccupational Safety and Health Act 2005, indicating in each \ncase, the relevant section of the said law under which each one \nwas prosecuted?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/607",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 607,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Land Transport – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Forbach Road, extending from \nForbach to Poudre d'Or Hamlet, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to (a) the speed deterrents and \nother measures being envisaged along Cottage, Esperance \nTrebuchet and Poudre d’Or Hamlet and (b) where matters stand \nas to the (i) proposed implementation of a yellow box and traffic \nlights at the Esperance Trebuchet Junction, in the vicinity of the \nfilling station and (ii) proposed upgrading of the Poudre d'Or \nHamlet Traffic Centre? \n \n \n \n \nCANCELLED\n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                          PAGE 11 of 16 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/608",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 608,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Land Transport – \n \nWhether, in regard to the persistent traffic congestion \noccurring during peak hours from Hillcrest Avenue and \nsurrounding residential areas towards the motorway leading \nto Port Louis, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \nthe Road Development Authority, information as to the \nremedial measures being envisaged in relation thereto?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/609",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 609,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Local Government – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Recreational Park at Farquhar \nAvenue, in Quatre Bornes, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes, \ninformation as to whether a maintenance and security service \nhas been contracted therefor and, if so, give details thereof and, \nif not, why not?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/610",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 610,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Housing and Lands – \n \nWhether, in regard to the plot of land situated at Beau Plan, \nknown as Morcellement Le Hameau, he will state if the \npromoter/s thereof has/have been issued with Environment \nImpact Assessment (EIA) Licences in respect thereof?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/611",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 611,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of National Infrastructure – \n \nWhether, in regard to the roundabouts on the M1, M2 and M3 \nmotorways, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nRoad Development Authority, the list thereof earmarked for \nconversion into Grade-Separated Junctions to alleviate traffic \ncongestion thereat, indicating in each case (a) the scope of \nworks (b) the estimated cost and (c) where matters stand as to \nthe implementation of the project? \nCANCELLED\n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                          PAGE 12 of 16 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/612",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 612,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Energy and Public Utilities – \n \nWhether, in regard to water supply, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, \ninformation as to the number of complaints filed by residents \nof Constituency No. 5 in relation thereto, indicating the number \nof unattended cases thereof and in each case, the (a) date of \nfiling of the complaint and (b) nature thereof?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/613",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 613,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Land Transport – \n \n \n Whether, in regard to bus routes 53, 26 and 221, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport \nAuthority, information as to the remedial measures undertaken \nor envisaged to ensure regular and reliable public transport \nservices along same?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/614",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 614,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Local Government – \n \n  \nWhether, in regard to the St Martin Dam Leisure Park Project in \nQuartier Militaire, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the District Council of Moka, information as to (a) the \nnames of the contractor/s involved therein, indicating the \nquantum of funds paid to each in respect of works carried out \nand (b) if the District Council supplied materials therefor and, if \nso, give details thereof?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/615",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 615,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, \nBlue Economy and Fisheries – \n \nWhether, in regard to the small sugarcane planters, he will state \nthe measures being taken to secure (a) adequate labour \navailability for the cultivation and harvesting of the fields \nthereof (b) availability thereto of mechanized solutions to \naddress labour shortage (c) improved targeted financial \nassistance, \nsubsidies \nor \ncredit \nschemes \nto \nsupport \nmechanization and improve overall productivity and viability \nthereof and (d) importation of labour with other ministries? \nCANCELLED\n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                          PAGE 13 of 16 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/616",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 616,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Gender Equality and Family \nWelfare – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Rivière du Rempart Women \nEmpowerment Centre, she will state (a) the reasons for the \nclosure thereof in 2020 and (b) whether consideration will be \ngiven for the re-opening thereof and, if so, when and, if not, why \nnot?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025",
        "tuesday-07-october-2025",
        "tuesday-28-october-2025",
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/617",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 617,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Youth and Sports –  \n \nWhether, in regard to the proposed introduction of a new \nadministrative framework and a new Sports Bill, he will state \nwhere matters stand, indicating if (a) prior consultations have \nbeen or will be held with Rodrigues sports communities and  \n(b) Government is agreeable for the setting up of a special \ncommittee to make recommendations on the setting up and \nmissions of a Comité Régional Olympique et Sportif (CROS) for \nRodrigues and, if so, when?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/618",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 618,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Social Integration, Social Security \nand National Solidarity – \n \nWhether, in regard to the dismantling and replacement of the \nNational Pension Fund (NPF) by the outgoing Government, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to  \n(a) the balance of the then NPF at time of dissolution  \n(b) whether the assets thereof were transferred to a successor \nentity, redistributed or repurposed and (c) whether same \nimpacted the beneficiaries thereof and long-term pension \nsustainability? \n \n \n \n \nCANCELLED\n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                          PAGE 14 of 16 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/619",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 619,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of National Infrastructure – \n \nWhether, in regard to the new bypass road leading to the  \nSir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the Road Development \nAuthority, information as to whether consideration will be \ngiven for the (a) upgrading and embellishing of the \nroundabouts and motorway along same and (b) review of the \nexisting and installation of new directional road traffic signs \nand street lighting thereat?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/620",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 620,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness – \n \nWhether, in regard to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and \nComputed Tomography (CT) Scan Equipment, he will give a list \nof the public health institutions equipped therewith, indicating \nin each case (a) the number thereof presently not operational \nand the expected date of coming into operation thereof and  \n(b) when all public health institutions will be equipped \ntherewith?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/621",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 621,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Financial Services and Economic \nPlanning – \n \nWhether, in regard to the placing in May 2020 of Mauritius on \nthe \nGrey \nlist \nof \nthe \nFinancial \nAction \nTask \nForce  \nas “Jurisdiction under increased monitoring” black list of the \nEuropean Commission as “High risk third countries” and list of \n“High risk third countries” by the United Kingdom on  \nMarch 2021, she will state why the outgoing Government and \nthe then Minister of Financial Services failed to take \nappropriate timely measures despite warnings to avoid the \nabove listings and prevent the image of Mauritius from bad \npress and damages to the Mauritian economy? \n \n \nCANCELLED\n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                          PAGE 15 of 16 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/622",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 622,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Energy and Public Utilities – \n \nWhether, in regard to the pipe laying works undertaken in \nConstituency No 4, Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water \nAuthority, information as to when the roads damaged in the \ncourse thereof will be reinstated, indicating the timeframe set \ntherefor, if any?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/623",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 623,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Youth and Sports –  \n \nWhether, in regard to the sports facilities and complexes in \nConstituency No. 13, he will state (a) if consideration will be \ngiven for the upgrading thereof, including lighting works and \n(b) obtain information as to the management and the \nmaintenance of the Multi-Use Games Area (MUGA) sports \ncomplex? \n \n \n \n \nBibi Safeena Lotun, C.S.K. (Mrs)                                           \nClerk of the National Assembly \n \n \nParliament House \nPort Louis  \n \n27 June 2025 \n \n \n \n \nCANCELLED\n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                          PAGE 16 of 16 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org \n \n \nMAURITIUS NATIONAL ASSEMBLY  \nQuestions of which notice has been given  \nNot Requiring an Oral Answer  \nSitting of Tuesday 01 July 2025  \n \nQuestions addressed to Honourable Ministers, other than to   \nDr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs \nand External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for \nRodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "A/1",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 1,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of National Infrastructure – \n \nWhether, in regard to the lands located in the vicinity of the \nTory Crown Land, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to where matters stand regarding the proposed \nraising of the banks thereat and reconstruction of bridges along \nsame?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "A/2",
      "sitting_id": "01-july-2025-cancelled",
      "date": "2025-07-01",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 2,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Local Government – \n \nWhether, in regard to the poultry pen found on the reserve of \nRivulet St Louis at Cardinal Avenue, Morcellement Raffray, \nGuibies, Pailles, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \nthe Municipal City Council of Port Louis, information as to \nwhether actions have been initiated on the request of the \nForestry Service in relation thereto? \n \n \n \nBibi Safeena Lotun, C.S.K. (Mrs)                                           \nClerk of the National Assembly \n \n \nParliament House \nPort Louis  \n27 June 2025 \nCANCELLED",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/576",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 576,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/576) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Lallmatie \nPolice Station, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, \ninformation as to the – \n (a) number of \n (i) \nMale and Women Police Officers posted thereat, and  \n(ii) \nvehicles attached thereto, and  \n(b) \nextent of the premises thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Commissioner of \nPolice that Lallmatie Police Station falls under the Eastern Division and is responsible for \npolicing in an area of 21 Km2 with approximately 45,000 inhabitants.  \nWith regard part a (i) of the question, I am informed that a total of 48 police officers is \ncurrently posted at the station comprising 36 male officers and 12 women officers. \n\n19 \n \nAs regards to part a (ii) of the question, I am informed that the current fleet of vehicles \nallocated to the Lallmatie Police Station comprises two double cab vans, one motorcycle, and \ntwo patrol bikes. \nRegarding part (b) of the question, I am further informed that Lallmatie Police Station \noccupies a surface area of 115 m2 which includes a charge room, an inquiry room, an exhibit \nroom, administrative offices, and barracks. There is also parking space for three vehicles. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed by the Commissioner of Police that in \nview of the growing policing needs of the region, action was initiated in 2021 with the \nMinistry of Housing and Land Use Planning to allocate a plot of land in the same region for \nthe construction of a new police station. However, no suitable site had been secured and \ndiscussions have now started again to identify an appropriate location.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine \nMagnien! \n \nOFFICIAL VEHICLES’ ACQUISITION – PERIOD 2015-2024 – MAKE, MODEL & \nPURCHASE PRICE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/577",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 577,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/577) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to official \nvehicles acquired for use by the former Prime Minister and former Ministers since January \n2015 to November 2024, he will state the number thereof, indicating, in each case, the make, \nmodel and purchase price thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that for the period \nJanuary 2015 to November 2024, two official vehicles were bought for use by the former \nPrime Ministers. For the late Sir Anerood Jugnauth, a BMW 760Li 760 5972cc at the cost of \nRs21,696,486 purchased on 21 November 2016. And, for Mr Pravind Jugnauth, a BMW \n760Li 760 5972cc purchased on 14 October 2021 at the cost of Rs19,523,282.01. \n(Interruptions) \nBoth purchases amounting, therefore, to a total of Rs41.2 million. \nMr Etwareea: La caisse n’est effectivement pas vide ! \n\n20 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: No comment! \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the list for former Ministers is a very \nlong list. I will circulate it.  \nBut let me just say, that a total of 42 official vehicles were acquired for use by former \nMinisters at a total cost of Rs120 million.  \nLet me also add, the House may wish to note, that no new cars have been purchased \neither for myself or for the Deputy Prime Minister since we took office, in spite of the fact, \nthat these cars have broken down. \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lukeeram: Would the hon. Prime Minister, by any chance, have the relevant \ninformation with regard to the former PPSs? \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, I have the information for the former PPSs, but as I said, the \nlist is… \nThe Deputy Speaker: The question is related to Parliamentary Private Secretaries. \nThe Prime Minister: I intend to circulate it, if you agree, because it is quite a long list. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay.  \nThe hon. Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nMINISTERS & JUNIOR MINISTERS – OFFICIAL OVERSEAS MISSIONS –\nTRAVEL ENTITLEMENTS & PRIVILEGES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/578",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 578,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/578) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Honourable Ministers and Junior Ministers, he will state, when travelling for \nofficial overseas missions – \n(a) \nthe per diem rates to which they are entitled when proceeding to – \n(i) \nthe United Kingdom; \n(ii) \nEuropean Union countries; \n(iii) \nSwitzerland, and \n(iv) \nthe United States of America, and \n(b) \nwhether they are entitled to – \n\n21 \n \n(i) \ntravelling in first or business class, and \n(ii) \nchauffeur-driven limousines in the course thereof at the cost of \nGovernment.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the policies and procedures regarding \nofficial mission abroad are contained in Circular letter No. 10 of 2017 of the Ministry of \nFinance. \nAs of today, the rates applicable are actually the same when the hon. Member himself \nwas Speaker of the National Assembly.  \nIf you remember, for a period of 78 days, you undertook three missions: one to India, \none to China, and one to Armenia for a total cost of Rs748,111. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Ti jouisseur! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: Three missions, 78 days! \nMr A. Duval: Reponn pou asterla! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Ti jouisseur! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question \nregarding the class of travel in line, it is in line with the existing policy. Ministers are eligible \nto travel in first class and Junior Ministers in business class same as the Parliamentary Private \nSecretaries before. \nAs regards transport facilities, whenever same are not provided by the organisers or \nhost countries, our overseas embassies and high commissions normally make appropriate \narrangements for officials at the level of Ministers, Secretary to the Cabinet and Head of the \nCivil Service. \nWhen such facilities are not available, then only cars are provided for official use to the \neligible officials. \nMr A. Duval: May I ask the hon. Prime Minister, is it not time, in view of the \neconomic urgency, to review the said rates? \nYou said it rightly so yourself! The rates have remained the same, and they should be \nlowered now because we are asking the population to… \n\n22 \n \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question! Put your question! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Hypocrite ! \nMr A. Duval: …tighten their belt! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: He is a demagogue! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: He is a hypocrite! \nThe Prime Minister: This is demagogy! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: May I ask the hon. Prime Minister… \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: Why did you not return your money? Return your money! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: May I ask the hon. Prime Minister… \n(Interruptions) \nMay I ask the hon. Prime Minister… \n(Interruptions) \nMay I ask the hon. Prime Minister… \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Order! Order! \nMr A. Duval: …whether he finds it…. \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Members, order! \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members: Hypocrite! Démagogie ! \n\n23 \n \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: May I ask the hon. Prime Minister… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question, please! No comments! Put your question! \nMr A. Duval: I am asking! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question, please! \nMr A. Duval: May I ask the hon. Prime Minister whether he would now consider \nmaking hon. Ministers and Junior Ministers travel by business class? When we know that an \nair ticket to Turkey, for example, in first class… \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Lin jouir! \nMr A. Duval: …is Rs316,000. \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question! Put your question! \nMr A. Duval: May the hon. Prime Minister also consider… \nMs J. Bérenger: Mari toupe sa! \nMr A. Duval: … reducing the chauffer driven privilege at the tune of Rs50,000 per \nday, which is rented by Government for Ministers to travel when abroad? Is it not time for the \nhon. Prime Minister to review those rates? \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question! Put your question! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: Will he also give the figures, as per the question asked? \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this is typical of what a demagogue \ndoes! \n(Interruptions) \nHe enjoyed all the privileges he is talking about!  \n\n24 \n \nHon. Members: Démagogue ! La honte ! \nThe Prime Minister: Now, he wants us… \n(Interruptions) \nZot finn defons lakes!  \nNow, you want us…  \n(Interruptions) \nWhat do you want? \n(Interruptions) \nWhat do you want? \nHon. Members: La honte ! La honte ! \nThe Prime Minister: What do you want? \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question! \n(Interruptions) \n Order! Order! Order! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: You must have some dignity! \nHon. Members: La honte ! La honte ! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Order!  \nNext question! Hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Jouisseur ! \nMr A. Duval: Twa ki jouisseur ! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: Pli gran jouisseur ki twa pena! \n \n \n\n25 \n \nLINE BARRACKS, PORT LOUIS – DRIVING TESTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/579",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 579,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/579) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to driving \ntests at the Line Barracks in Port Louis, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the number thereof carried out since January 2025 \nto date, indicating the – \n(a) \nnumber thereof conducted daily; \n(b) \ntime scheduled therefor, and \n(c) \nnumber of Police Officers deployed therefor.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Commissioner of \nPolice that from January 2025 to June 2025, a total of 11,331 driving tests have been \nconducted at the Line Barracks Driving Test Centre.  \nIn regard to part (a) of the question, around 200 prospective drivers are convened daily \nfor driving tests at Line Barracks Driving Test Centre. \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: No cross talking, please! \nThe Prime Minister: However, an average number of 120 driving tests are carried out \ndaily, taking into consideration requests for rescheduling at short notice and absentees. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, driving tests which comprise road test, parking test, \nreverse test are conducted from 07.30 hrs in the morning to 16.00 hours on weekdays and \n07.30 hrs to noon on Saturdays. The appointments for the driving test during weekdays are \nscheduled in six batches of 30 candidates for cars, autocycles, motorcycles and other light \nvehicles. \nFurthermore, as from 12.30 hrs, driving tests are scheduled in respect of some 20 heavy \nvehicles, such as lorries and buses.  \nIn respect to part (c) of the question, a total number of 25 Police Officers are deployed \non a daily basis for the testing at Line Barracks. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that driving tests are also carried \nout daily at two other driving test centres situated at Les Casernes, Curepipe and Argy, Flacq.  \n\n26 \n \nFor the period of January 2025 to June 2025, the number of driving tests conducted at \nthese two centres were 9,382 and 7,093.  \nI also wish to inform the House, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that we are bringing some \nfundamental changes for the issuing of driving licenses. A graduated licensing system is \nbeing envisaged. We will give details later. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you have one supplementary on this?  \nMr Quirin: Oui, M. le président. J’ai eu l’occasion de m’entretenir récemment avec \nquelques moniteurs d’auto-école… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question! Put your question! \nMr Quirin: But I must introduce my question! \nThe Deputy Speaker: No, whatever you have had with the… \nPut your question to the hon.  Prime Minister! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Nou pa le konne kisanla tonn zwen. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Let us go straight to the question! \nMr Quirin: Et aussi avec quelques candidats qui ont récemment passé leur examen de \nconduite. Ils sont tous unanimes à affirmer qu’il y a un manque d’examinateurs et aussi un \ntemps d’attente beaucoup trop long. De ce fait, je demande à l’honorable Premier ministre, \nest-ce qu’il a déjà pris connaissance de cela et est-ce qu’il compte demander au commissaire \nde police de faire le nécessaire afin de remédier à la situation ? \nThe Prime Minister: Perhaps, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, people maybe do not realise \nthat you can actually apply for a provisional driving license online through the Police \nDepartment’s website or the e-Government portal. \nMr Quirin: M. le président, rapidement, une dernière question avec votre permission. \nMercredi dernier, le 2 juillet, un incident s’est produit à Line Barracks où une jeune dame \ncandidate qui était venue passer son examen de conduite a été prise d’une crise d’épilepsie. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Your question! \nMr Quirin: Qu’on a dû transporter d’urgence à l’hôpital. Justement, par rapport, est-ce \nque le Premier ministre ne pense-t-il pas qu’il faudrait que chaque candidat produise un \n\n27 \n \ncertificat médical ? Fort heureusement, la personne en question ne conduisait pas à ce \nmoment-là. Donc, on a pu faire le nécessaire et la transporter d’urgence à l’hôpital. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, your question! \nMr Quirin: Ne pense-t-il pas, M. le président, qu’il faudrait que chaque candidat qui \naspire à obtenir son permis de conduire doit produire un certificat médical faisant état de la \nbonne santé de la personne en question ? \nThe Prime Minister: I just mentioned that we are bringing some fundamental changes. \nThat will also include medical certificate. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \nMONTAGNE LONGUE POLICE STATION – STAFF SHORTAGE – \nREMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/580",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 580,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/580) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Montagne Longue Police Station, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Commissioner of Police, information as to whether Police Officers posted thereat \nhave recently been transferred therefrom, indicating whether measures have been taken to \nremedy the staffing shortage thereat.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Commissioner of \nPolice that Montagne Longue Police Station covers an area of 12 km2 with some 18,000 \ninhabitants. Currently, it is staffed by 52 Police Officers of different ranks. \nI am further informed that Montagne Longue Police Station is classified as a Class C \nStation having an authorised strength of 37 Police Officers. However, with the development \nand expansion of commercial and residential areas in the region, the number of Police \nOfficers posted to the station had gradually been increased. \nThe personnel at Montagne Longue Police Station was increased from 45 in 2023 to 67 \nin 2024. The staffing position was rationalised this year. As from 03 July of this year, the \nnumber of officers was brought down to 52. Consequently, 14 Police Officers were \ntransferred to other units based on the operation requirements of one officer required from the \nPolice Force. \n\n28 \n \nNotwithstanding the transfer of the 14 Police Officers, there is no shortage, according \nto the information I have, of personnel at the station which is adequately staffed, which is \nfelt, and the present strength there is fully sufficient for effective policing. \nHowever, Montagne Longue Police Station is also supported by other units, such as the \nother units, the Emergency Response Service, the Field Intelligence, the Central Investigation \nDivision, the Anti Drug Smuggling Unit and the Traffic Police. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \nOFFICIAL OVERSEAS MISSIONS (NOV 2024-JULY 2025) – MINISTERS & \nJUNIOR MINISTERS – DETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/581",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 581,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/581) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to official overseas missions, he will state the number thereof undertaken by \nHonourable Ministers, including himself and Junior Ministers, since November 2024 to date, \nindicating in each case the – \n(a) \npurpose/s thereof; \n(b) \ncomposition of the accompanying delegation; \n(c) \ncountries visited; \n(d) \nduration, and \n(e) \ntotal cost incurred, including cost of airfares, local transportation and per diem \nallowances.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with your permission, I am answering \nPQs B/581 and B/595 together as they more or less relate to the same subject. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as the House is aware, Ministers only attend overseas mission \nwhen invited.  \nAs Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, I have myself been invited, believe it or \nnot, to attend 55 overseas missions to date since I took office in November of last year. Let \nme give you a few some examples.  \n\n29 \n \nOn the very day the results were being proclaimed, the Prime Minister of India, Shri \nModi, rang me, spoke to me in person, wanted me to come to India for a State Visit in \nDecember of last year. I had to decline the invitation because I had just been elected. This is \ngoing to be programmed for later. \nAgain, President Macron rang me personally to invite me for the reopening of Notre \nDame de Paris Cathedral on 07 December. This was attended by worldwide dignitaries \nincluding President Trump and other Heads of States of several European and African \ncountries. That also I turned down, because I had just been elected; I did not feel I could go at \nthat time. \nThird, the Secretary-General of the OECD invited me to be the Speaker at the Global \nAnticorruption and Integrity Forum in France on 26 and 27 March. I declined that invitation \nalso for the same reason.  \nI was also invited to attend the funeral ceremony of late Pope Francis and the ceremony \nfor the election of the new Pope. I declined; I asked the hon. Attorney General to represent \nme for the funeral and the hon. Minister Assirvaden for the election of the new Pope. \nAs Minister of Finance, I did not attend the annual Spring Meetings of the IMF and the \nWorld Bank Group held in Washington from 21 to 26 April 2025.  \nIn other words, out of the 55 invitations, I only chose to attend three of them. And let \nme say, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that my approval for Ministers is given only if those \nmissions are considered to be of a strategic geopolitical or economic importance to our \ncountry. \nI wish to inform the House that I myself led only three official missions as opposed to \nthe 55 invitations. The first one was for the African Union Summit in 2025 held in Ethiopia \nfrom 15 to 16 February. That was important to attend. Secondly, the 5th Summit of Heads of \nState and Government of the Indian Ocean Commission held in Madagascar on 24 April \n2025. The third one was the United Nations Ocean Conference in Nice to which Heads of \nState and Government were invited, which was followed by a bilateral meeting which \nPresident Macron had invited me. He took his plane from Nice to come to Paris for this \nofficial bilateral meeting and then went back to Nice. That was from 09 to 13 June 2025. \nAs for Ministers and Junior Ministers, a total of 40 official overseas missions have been \nundertaken from November 2024 to date. The total cost comparison of these missions \namounted to Rs28,278,224.08. This is compared to Rs196,400,000 for the period 2015-2024.  \n\n30 \n \nLet me add, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that the total cost for the official overseas mission \nundertaken by the former Prime Ministers including air fares and per diem amounted to \nRs14.2 million during the period 2015 to 2019 and to Rs16.3 million from 2020 to 2024, \nwhich makes a total of Rs30.5 million. \nRegarding official missions of former Ministers and Members of Parliament, the total \ncost is Rs109.4 million for the period 2015 to 2019 and Rs56.5 million for the period 2020 to \n2024, which makes a total of Rs165.9 million. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, your question, please! \nMr A. Duval: Will the hon. Prime Minister be able to provide the House with the list \nof details, as requested, that is, the purpose, the composition and the costs, including the cost \nof other members of delegation on the one hand, and secondly, can he also clarify when he is \ncomparing the expenses spent … \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: How many questions is this, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir? \nMr A. Duval: … for a mandate with that of his Government for seven months, is that \nwhat he is doing? \nThe Prime Minister: You have asked two questions in one. So, which one do you \nwant me to answer? \nMr A. Duval: If he will provide the composition and cost? \nThe Prime Minister: I can provide, but I am not going to go into that. Then I can \ncompare from 2014 onwards; I will compare all.  \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: You have a question on this? \nMr A. Duval: … with a detailed information, especially for me. Give it! \nThe Prime Minister: For you… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Your leader is asking a question, please! \nMr Lesjongard: The hon. Prime Minister stated that he goes on mission only when he \nis invited. Does that principle apply to all Ministers and Junior Ministers also? \n\n31 \n \nThe Prime Minister: Yes. I just said, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. If the hon. Leader of the \nOpposition had listened. I said that Ministers do not go because they decide to go to XYZ; \nthey must be invited.  \nMr Lesjongard: That’s what I am saying. \nThe Prime Minister: I answered that question. We look at it; whether it is essential for \nthem to go and what will be the benefit for Mauritius. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or! \nMAUBANK LTD – PROPOSED SALE – TRANSACTION ADVISOR",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/582",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 582,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/582) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nproposed sale of MauBank Ltd, by the outgoing Government, he will state whether the \nservices of a Transaction Advisor were retained to oversee same and, if so, indicate the \nnames thereof and the terms and conditions of the contract, including success fees or other \nremuneration structures and the quantum thereof paid out thereto, if any, as at to date.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, MauBank Holdings Ltd had on 30 May \n2022 appointed the consortium composed of GA Company SRL, Gibraltar Advisory, Priscus \nFinance and Verde Frontier Solutions Ltd as Transaction Advisor for the disposal of its \nshares and its subsidiaries. \nI wish to highlight that Verde Frontier Solution Ltd is currently under investigation by \nthe Financial Crimes Commission for suspected irregularities for the award of contracts from \nmany public entities. They are also the ones who published fake poles on the eve of the \nelection to say that they were going to win the election. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the contract between MauBank Holdings Ltd and the \nconsortium was vetted by Mr Yerrigadoo and Ms S. Carrim, Barrister at law. As per the \nterms and conditions of the contract, the Transaction Advisor had to, among other things, \nshortlist qualified bidders, conduct due diligence in respect to the preferred bidder and \nprepare the sale and purchase agreement, and oversee transaction closing and the transfer of \nthe proceeds of the sales. This is what they were supposed to do. \nI am further informed that by the said contract, the Transaction Advisor was entitled to \na fixed sum and a success fee.  \n\n32 \n \nI must say, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, no sale ever materialised, but nevertheless, the \nconsortium was paid a fixed sum of Rs17,967,436. \nThis is the kind of thing they did that today we are in the economic mess that we are. \nAbuse of power, giving, dishing out money – this is the result today!  \nNo doubt, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, there was largesse unseen when it came to \nfavouring Verde Frontier Solutions Ltd under the previous regime. But all is being \ninvestigated by the Financial Crimes Commission. His contract has been terminated on 12 \nMay of this year. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix! \nMRA & ADSU – CUSTOMS ANTI-NARCOTICS SECTION – DRUG \nSEIZURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/583",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 583,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/583) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to drugs, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the Customs Anti-Narcotics Section of the Mauritius \nRevenue Authority and the Anti-Drug Smuggling Unit, information as to the quantity thereof \nseized at the ports and airports, respectively, since December 2024 to date, indicating the – \n(a) \nvalue thereof in each case, and  \n(b) \nnumber of cases in which controlled delivery thereof resulted in the arrest of the \nlocal counterparts.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Commissioner of \nPolice that as from December 2024 to 03 July 2025, 58 drug trafficking cases were detected \nat the ports and airports in Mauritius and Rodrigues. \nThis was through joint operations conducted by ADSU and MRA officers. These \noperations resulted in the seizure of 691.2 kg of dangerous drugs. In addition, other \ndangerous drugs in the form of pills, liquids, seeds and synthetic gummies were also seized. \nA total of 64 persons has been arrested in connection with these seizures.  \nIn relation to part (a) of the question, I am informed that the total estimated street value \nof the drugs seized during this period amounts to Rs1,115,136,222. So, over 1 billion. \n\n33 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that \nbetween December 2024 and 03 July 2025, 17 controlled delivery exercise were conducted \nby ADSU with a view to identifying local collaborators. 13 of these operations were \nsuccessful and led to the arrest of 19 suspects. \nI would also like to reiterate the firm determination of this Government to fight the drug \nscourge. Equipping ADSU and MRA with the latest technological tools for combatting \nproliferation of illegal drugs, including synthetic drugs is a matter of top priority for this \nGovernment.  \nProvisions have been made in the Budget 2025-2026 for the procurement of specialised \nitems such as drones, two scanners to be installed at Rodrigues, and one full body X-Ray \nscanner at Cruise Terminal for ADSU and MRA. \nThe Government has also just set up the National Agency for Drug Control which will \nbring together enforcement, rehabilitation and family support services under one roof. The \nAgency will collaborate with both ADSU and Customs Anti-Narcotics Section of the \nMauritius Revenue Authority. The Agency is currently developing a master plan which will \nserve as the national strategic framework for drug use, including prevention, treatment, harm \nreduction and law enforcement. The master plan will adopt a comprehensive evidence-based \nand multisectoral approach to address the drug-related challenges. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Government is also strengthening its maritime security \narchitecture through regional cooperation, bilateral partnership and strategic investments to \nprevent drug trafficking in the high seas. Collaborative initiatives such as the Safe Seas \nAfrica Project, Cutlass Express and bilateral engagements with France and also with the \nsupport from Japan for upgrading coastal surveillance demonstrate a shared commitment to \ncombat transnational threats, including drug trafficking to ensure the safety and security of \nour maritime domain. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, the hon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and \nSouillac! \nCOVID-19 – PACK & BLISTER – DEFECTIVE VENTILATORS PROCUREMENT – \nINQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/584",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 584,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/584) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \n\n34 \n \nregard to the purchase of ventilators by the Ministry of Health and Wellness from Pack & \nBlister during the COVID-19 pandemic, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nFinancial Crimes Commission, information as to where matters stand regarding the inquiry \ninitiated thereinto.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me remind the House that during the \nCOVID-19 pandemic, the State Trading Corporation had, on behalf of the then Government, \nprocured 50 medical ventilators from Pack & Blister Distribuciones Farmacéuticas, located in \nSpain, against an outright payment of 1.8 million euros.  \nThe equipment was delivered to the Ministry of Health in July 2020. Upon inspection, \nit was reported that the ventilators were defective and not according to specifications \nprovided by Pack & Blister and as agreed between the parties. These ventilators turned out to \nbe utterly useless.  \nSo, the then Government had paid 1.8 million euros for defective ventilators while \npatients in dire need in Mauritius were dying during the COVID. This is what the \nGovernment, you once were part of, did. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, following several representations made to Pack & Blister, the \nequipment was returned to the supplier in Spain in December 2021. However, Pack & Blister \nrefused to take ownership of the equipment and the consignment has been stored in a freeport \nzone in Barcelona, Spain. The monthly charges for storage of the defective ventilators are \naround 800 euros per month. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, after consultation with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, \nRegional Integration and International Trade and the Attorney General’s Office, the Ministry \nof Health and Wellness enlisted the services of a Spanish law firm in March 2023 to start \nlegal proceedings against Pack & Blister to recover the expenses incurred. Notices for non-\ncompliance were served to Pack and Blister in July 2024 but the latter refused to receive the \nnotices. Meanwhile, Pack & Blister declared bankrupt on 20 September 2024 and entered an \ninsolvency procedure. \nThese expenses, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, incurred so far for the procurement of 50 \nventilators including the action taken for their return to Pack & Blister and legal fees, has cost \nus Rs98 million. For 50 ventilators that people were dying during COVID here, they ordered, \ngave money and it was not working. Ask yourself who did this. \n(Interruptions) \n\n35 \n \nI wish to reassure the House that no stone will be left unturned to recover the amount \nand as such, a case is being lodged before the First Instance Court in Spain. \nAlso, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in regard to the Parliamentary Question of the hon. \nMember, I am informed by the Financial Services Commission that the defunct Independent \nCommission Against Corruption started an investigation on the procurement of the \nventilators. It was a show because elections were near. They had to show. We were saying in \nOpposition what they were doing. So, they started investigation on 7 July 2020 and I am \ninformed that so far, nothing happened to that inquiry. Now, the FCC is re-inquiring, already \n13 further statements have been taken. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Time is over!  \nHon. Members, the Table has been advised that the following PQs have been \nwithdrawn: B/586, B/588, B/589, B/590, B/591, B/594, and B/596. \nThe Table has also been advised that PQ B/602 will be replied by the hon. Minister of \nEnvironment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change.  \nSo, I now call upon the hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES – LAND DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN – UPDATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/585",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 585,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/585) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the monthly allowance, gratuity and other benefits to which Advisers and Senior \nAdvisers are entitled, he will state whether same have recently been revised, and, if so, \nindicate the – \n(a) \nquantum thereof, whether in cash or in kind, and \n(b) \neffective date thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: I wish to refer the hon. Member to the statement I made in the House on \nWednesday 25 June 2025 on the salaries payable to Advisers. \nAs I stated, with a view to rationalising the monthly allowances payable to Advisers, \nmy Government has categorised advisers into five categories, namely – \n(i) \nSenior Adviser (Technical); \n(ii) \nSenior Adviser; \n\n132 \n \n(iii) \nAdviser; \n(iv) \nAdviser on Information Matters, and \n(v) \nAdviser on Public Relations Matters. \nAs I said, Government also wants to be transparent in respect to the different scales of \nsalaries applicable to Advisers. We do not want to leave it to the discretion of whoever comes \nto power to decide on his own personal volition, his personal wishes, how much of public \nmoney should be spent on people who have been recruited by them. \nAs such, with the new grading and pay structure, all persons enlisted in a particular \ncategory would now draw the same pay package, contrary to past practice under the previous \ngovernment. \nIn regard to part (a) of the question, the quantum now in force are – \n \nSSR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – ADDITIONAL PARKING SLOTS – \nDIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/586",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 586,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/586) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Sir \nSeewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom Airport Terminal Operations Ltd., information as to whether consideration will be given \nfor the provision thereat of – \n(a) \nadditional parking slots, roads and exit gates, and \n(b) \nadequate directional signage on the parking areas of the Old Terminal, \nindicating the current use made thereof and if same will be operational anew \nand, if so, when, giving details thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nS/N \nCategory \nQuantum \n(i)  \nSenior Adviser (Technical) \nRs  100,000 \n(ii)  \nSenior Adviser \nRs    90,000 \n(iii) \nAdviser \nRs   70,000 \n(iv) \nAdviser on Information Matters \nRs    66,200 \n(v)  \nAdviser on Public Relations Matters \nRs   60,000 \n\n133 \n \nHOMICIDE & VIOLENT DEATH – REPORTED CASES – PERIOD NOV 2024-\nJUNE 2025",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/587",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 587,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/587) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to homicide and violent death, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the number of reported cases thereof since \nNovember 2024 to date, indicating the – \n(a) \nnumber thereof in which arrests were effected; \n(b) \nnumber of suspects formally charged, and \n(c) \nmeasures envisaged to address the issue and reduce the occurrence thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: The terms “homicide” and “violent-death,” as referred to by the hon. Member, \nare offences which are categorised as murder, manslaughter, murder of a newly born child, \ncastration causing death, assault with premeditation causing death and assault upon father or \nmother with aggravating circumstances causing death in the Criminal Code. \nWith regard to parts (a) and (b) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of \nPolice that from November 2024 to 04 July 2025, 24 cases of murder and 1 case of \nmanslaughter were reported to the Police.  46 persons were arrested in connection with these \ncases, out of which, 45 persons were provisionally charged for murder and 1 for \nmanslaughter. \nAs regards part (c) of the question, I am further informed that since this Government \ntook office, several measures have been put in place by the Mauritius Police Force as part of \nan integrated approach to reduce the occurrence of such crimes.  These include inter alia – \n(i) \nThe adoption of a risk-based approach by regularly visiting elderly and \nvulnerable persons to ensure their security and aggressive sensitisation \ncampaigns across the island focused on safety, security, and crime prevention \nby the Crime Prevention Unit and the Brigade pour la Protection de la Famille; \n(ii) \nThe establishment of a dedicated Homicide Review Committee by the Brigade \npour la Protection de la Famille to study crime trends and identify root causes, \nespecially in cases of femicide and domestic violence-related deaths as well as \nthe increasing use of SafeCity Cameras for crime detection, and \n(iii) \nThe enlistment of a retired officer with extensive expertise in homicide \ninvestigations to guide and support Enquiring Officers in criminal investigation. \n\n134 \n \nThese actions are part of our broader national strategy to ensure the safety and security \nof all citizens, and these are already giving results with a 12% decrease in the crime rate \ncompared to the same period last year. \nMoreover, as I have already stated in the House on Thursday 19 June 2025, that several \nreforms are being brought in the Mauritius Police Force, and new technological equipment \nare being purchased for the Police to maintain law and order. These reforms reflect the \nGovernment’s clear commitment to ensuring the safety of every citizen, with special attention \nto the elderly, who are among the most vulnerable in our society. \nMy Government has always ensured that our institutions are equipped with the \nnecessary tools and resources to carry out their duties diligently and without interference. \n \nCOCAINE SEIZURE (95 KG) – INTERPOL ASSISTANCE – COCAINE STORAGE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/588",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 588,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/588) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the 95 kg of \ncocaine worth Rs 1.4 billion seized in a backhoe loader on 04 July 2019, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to where \nmatters stand regarding the inquiry initiated thereinto, indicating whether the – \n(a) \nassistance of Interpol is envisaged in relation thereto, and \n(b) \ncocaine is in the possession of the Police and, if so, further indicate whether – \n(i) \nall the 95 kg is stored and where, and \n(ii) \nregular monitoring thereof is carried out.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nMRS S.O., ATTORNEY AT LAW – FEES & ALLOWANCES & FRINGE BENEFITS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/589",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 589,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/589) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Mrs S.O., Attorney at Law, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information \nas to the total quantum of fees and allowances paid out thereto, together with the other fringe \nbenefits to which she was entitled, over the period 2015 to 2024 in her capacity as legal \nrepresentative, chairperson, board member and for any other legal services rendered to the \ndifferent Ministries and parastatal bodies. \n\n135",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nRODRIGUES REGIONAL ASSEMBLY – PUBLIC FUNDS MANAGEMENT – \nTRANSPARENCY& ACCOUNTABILITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/590",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 590,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/590) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Accounts of the \nRodrigues Regional Assembly, he will state – \n(a)  the measures and remedial actions, if any, taken to strengthen the governance and \nmanagement of public funds for budget transparency, accountability and \ncredibility thereof, and  \n(b)  whether new guidelines have been issued for the reallocation and virement of \nfunds, as recommended in the Fourth Report of the Public Accounts Committee \nof the Seventh National Assembly and, if so, give details thereof and, if not, why \nnot.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nREWARD MONEY – QUANTUM ALLOCATED – CHECK & BALANCE \nMECHANISM",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/591",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 591,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/591) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to reward money, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to \nthe – \n(a)  quantum thereof allocated to Police Officers over each of the past five financial \nyears;  \n(b)  procedures followed therefor, and  \n(c)  check and balance mechanism put in place to prevent abuse and illicit use thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nBANK CHEQUES – PROPOSED PHASE OUT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/592",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 592,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/592) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \n\n136 \n \nregard to the use of bank cheques as means of payment, he will state if consideration will be \ngiven for the phasing out thereof and, if so, when and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed that as part of the modernisation and digitalisation of the \ndomestic banking and payment services sector, the Bank of Mauritius is adopting a strategy \nfor promoting digital payments in Mauritius. Digital banking is becoming more prominent \neverywhere. \nDespite the rise of digital banking, cheques are still a crucial part of the banking \nindustry and is an option still widely in use. \nHowever, the switch to digital payments will go concurrently and is expected to yield \nmore transparency, allowing for conducive lending to different sectors in the economy.  \n \nPORT MATHURIN POST OFFICE – CUSTOMS UNIT – DRUG DETECTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/593",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 593,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/593) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the fight against \nproliferation of drugs through loose parcel in Rodrigues through the Port Mathurin Post \nOffice by Customs, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n (a) where matters stand as to the proposed installation of a scanner thereat for drug \ndetection, indicating how this exercise is carried out presently in the absence of \nsuch an equipment, and  \n(b)  the amount of drugs seized over the past five years thereat, indicating the types \nand market value thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply:  In regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Mauritius Revenue \nAuthority (MRA) that on 19 June 2025, a bidding exercise has been launched for the \nprocurement of two X-Ray scanners to be installed at the Parcel Post and the Port in \nRodrigues. The closing date for submission of bids has been fixed for 23 July 2025. It is \nexpected that the contract will be awarded in October 2025 and the equipment will be \ncommissioned in Rodrigues in January 2026.  \nI am further informed by the MRA that all incoming loose packets and parcels are \nprocessed at the Port Louis Post Office commonly known as the Parcel Post Office. Officers \nof the MRA Customs Anti-Narcotics Section (CANS) and Anti-Drug and Smuggling Unit \n(ADSU) are permanently posted thereat with a specific mandate for the detection of \n\n137 \n \nprohibited goods including dangerous drugs. They make use of profiling techniques and X-\nRay scanners and they are assisted by the MRA and ADSU K9 Unit whereby sniffer dogs are \ndeployed on a daily basis for sniffing operation.  \nLoose packets and parcels destined for Rodrigues which are suspected to contain \ndutiable, prohibited goods or products requiring authorization from Other Government \nAgencies (OGA) such as the Ministry of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and \nFisheries, the Ministry of Health and Wellness and the Mauritius Standard Bureau are \nretained for physical examination by Customs Officers posted at Port Mathurin Post Office. \nThe retained packets and parcels are placed in bags, which are sealed by Officers of the MRA \nCustoms and the Mauritius Post Ltd, to be transported to the airport and to Rodrigues under \ncustoms control. This exercise is monitored by the representatives of MRA Customs and the \nMauritius Post Ltd. Should the MRA CANS and ADSU have reasons to believe that a \nparticular packet or parcel might contain dangerous drugs, the Officer-in-Charge of the MRA \nCustoms and ADSU of both Mauritius and Rodrigues are immediately notified to that effect.  \nIn Rodrigues, Customs Officers posted at the Port Mathurin Post Office carries out a \nfurther profiling exercise with the assistance of Police dogs. All the retained suspicious \npackets and parcels are examined by Customs and ADSU Officers in the presence of the \nconsignee in accordance with section 27 of the Customs Act and the MRA Customs \nDepartmental Instruction No.1 of 2016.  \nIn case of any detection of dangerous drugs and other prohibited goods in the parcel, \nsame is secured and handed over to ADSU/CID for safe custody and enquiry.  \nFor local parcels and packets destined for Rodrigues, the packaging is done in presence \nof the representatives of the Mauritius Post Ltd at the Post Office counters. The sender has to \nprovide a detailed list of contents being shipped to Rodrigues. Sniffer dogs are deployed at \nthe Parcel Post Office for the detection of prohibited goods. Scanning exercise is also carried \nout whenever necessary. All the operations are carried out in the presence of representatives \nof Mauritius Post Ltd, prior to dispatching to Rodrigues. Customs Officers posted at the Port \nMathurin Post Office carry out a profiling exercise to identify any suspicious packet and \nparcel for physical examination. \n\n138 \n \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that \nfor year 2020 to 03 July 2025, two cases of Possession of Dangerous Drugs concerning loose \nparcels at Port Mathurin Post Office were reported as follows –  \n(i) \non 18 August 2020, two male persons were arrested when they came to collect \ntheir loose parcel which contained 1.44 grams of heroin having a street value of \nRs 15,000. They were sentenced on 15 September 2023, and \n(ii) \non 14 May 2025, a loose parcel suspected to contain 3.25 grams of Cannabis \nhaving a street value of Rs 3,936 remained unclaimed at Port Mathurin Post \nOffice. The report of the Forensic Science Laboratory is awaited for \nconfirmation. Police enquiry is ongoing. \n \nROSE BELLE CIVIL STATUS OFFICE – RELOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/594",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 594,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/594) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Rose \nBelle Civil Status Office, he will state if consideration will be given for the relocation thereof \nin a premise of good standard and comprising basic amenities and in the vicinity of the \nHealth Office delivering permits for cremation.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nOFFICIAL OVERSEAS MISSIONS – FORMER PRIME MINISTER, \nMINISTERS & MPs – COSTS BREAKDOWN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/595",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 595,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/595) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to official overseas missions undertaken by the former Prime Minister, former \nMinisters and Members of Parliament over the period 2015 to 2019 and 2020-2024, \nrespectively, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the total cost \nincurred therefor, including the cost of airfares and per diem allowances.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/581) \n \n\n139 \n \nDRUGS – WEST COAST & “LA PASSE” ENTRANCES – ARRESTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/596",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 596,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/596) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to drugs, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the \nnumber of arrests effected on the West Coast in connection therewith, especially, on boats \ncoming from Reunion Island, indicating if consideration will be given for the installation of \nSafe City Surveillance Cameras on the four entrances of “La Passe”.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nDIEGO GARCIA – UK-US MILITARY BASE –AIR STRIKES AGAINST IRAN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-march-2025",
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/597",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 597,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/597) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port-Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the joint UK-US military base located on Diego Garcia in the Chagos Archipelago \non which the Republic of Mauritius exercises its sovereignty, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to whether same was used in the recent air strikes launched \nagainst the Islamic Republic of Iran.",
      "answer": "Reply: The answer is no. \nRODRIGUES – MOTOR VEHICLE LICENCE PLATFORM – AVAILABLE \nSERVICES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/598",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 598,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/598) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nNational Infrastructure whether, in regard to the proposed development of a Land Drainage \nMaster Plan for Rodrigues, he will state where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have to inform the House that in the \nGovernment Programme 2025-2029, we announced that the Land Drainage Master Plan for \nRodrigues will be commissioned by the Land Drainage Authority. \nI am pleased to inform my colleagues that the preparation of the master plan has \nalready been initiated by the Land Drainage Authority in collaboration with the Agence \nFrançaise de Développement. Following the usual procedure, the contract for the \ndevelopment of the Land Drainage Master Plan for Rodrigues was awarded to consultant \nHYDRATEC SETEC in March 2025 for an amount of 462,640 Euros, about Rs25 million. A \nkick-off meeting was successfully held in Rodrigues on 13 March 2025, which marked the \nofficial commencement of the study. The scope of services under the contract includes – \n(i) \nMapping of natural and artificial drainage systems in Rodrigues; \n\n36 \n \n(ii) \nDevelopment of a master plan for integrated runoff water management and \nflood risk management in Rodrigues, and \n(iii) \nStrengthening the capacities of technical services in hydraulic modelling and all \nstakeholders in the water cycle on climate change adaptation. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this plan is being prepared recognising the high exposure of \nSmall Island Developing States like Rodrigues to climate change impacts. The Land \nDrainage Master Plan will consolidate Rodrigues furthermore towards being a resilient island \nin respect of the risks of flooding. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, consultant HYDRATEC SETEC submitted its inception report \nto the Land Drainage Authority on 17 June 2025. Same is actually being examined and the \nfinal report is expected by end of June 2026. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member. \nMr François: Thank you, hon. Minister for this answer. May I ask the hon. Minister, in \nthe meantime before the finalisation of this master plan, apart the three announced drains \nprojects in Rodrigues, namely at Quatre Vents, Pistache and Baie Topaze for this financial \nyear, whether NDU is working on the other LDA approved projects, mainly at – Grand Baie, \nMourouk, Acacia, Rivière Coco, and others for their high priority implementation in \nRodrigues thereat? \nMr Gunness: Certainly, it is in the Flood Management Programme. So, we are working \non the other drain projects, depending on the availability of funds, as and when we are going \nto initiate the projects. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you have a question? Okay. \nMr A. Duval: Yes. May I ask the hon. Minister – will the flood prone map which is part \nof the master plan be made public for Rodrigues in line with the promise that Government \nmade to make it public; the flood prone map for Rodrigues and for Mauritius as well? For \nRodrigues, when can we expect same to be made public? \nMr Gunness: Let us wait for the report first. The report will be ready in June 2026 if \nyou heard well. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \n\n37 \n \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 13 – SPORTS COMPLEXES – UPGRADING & \nMAINTENANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/599",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 599,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/599) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the sports facilities \nand complexes in Constituency No. 13, he will – \n(a) \nstate if consideration will be given for the upgrading thereof, including lighting \nworks, and  \n(b) \nobtain information as to the management and the maintenance of the Multi-Use \nGames Area Sports Complex.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, there are no sports facilities or complexes in \nConstituency No. 13 operating under the aegis of my Ministry. However, my Ministry \noperates two youth centres, namely at Bois Cheri and Souillac in Constituency No. 13.  \nThe Bois Cheri Youth Centre houses an indoor table tennis and badminton facilities, \nwhile that of Souillac provides outdoor sport facilities such as volleyball, street football and \nboulodrome. \nConcerning part (a) of the question, the two youth centres have recently been revamped \nand no upgrading civil works are required. However, I am informed that outdoor lightings at \nthe Souillac Youth Centre were defective. Needful has already been done. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that the Mauritius Sports Council \nmanages and maintains one Multi-Use Game Area, commonly known as MUGA, at La Flora, \ncomprising a walking cum running track in addition to usual sports facilities normally \navailable on those sites. I am further informed that the MUGA at La Flora is in good \ncondition. \nThere is another MUGA located at Tyack, which has not yet been handed over to the \nMSC.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Jhummun! \nMr Jhummun: I would like to know where matters stand in relation to the MUGA at \nTyack. \n\n38 \n \nMr Nagalingum: Just to enlighten the hon. Member, the MUGA initiative was \noriginally spearheaded by the Mauritius Telecom Foundation and later transferred to the \nMauritius Sports Council for management on a phased basis. The ten MUGAs under the \ncontrol of the MSC are – \n• \nLa Source; \n• \nLa Tour Koenig; \n• \nTriolet; \n• \nFlacq; \n• \nBel Air; \n• \nBeau Vallon; \n• \nLa Flora; \n• \nMalherbes; \n• \nSainte-Croix, and  \n• \nGoodlands. \nThe following three MUGAs which have not yet been transferred to the MSC are – \n• \nPhoenix; \n• \nTyack, and  \n• \nPoudre d’Or Hamlet. \nThe Deputy Speaker: One last question! \nMr Jhummun: May I know who will manage and maintain the complex at Tyack? Is it \nyour Ministry or the Mauritius Telecom as it was before? \nMr Nagalingum: It is the Mauritius Sports Council. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River! \nLA VALETTE & CAMELIA, BAMBOUS – HOUSING ESTATES – UNOCCUPIED \nUNITS & CAMERA SURVEILLANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/600",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 600,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/600) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the housing estates at La Valette and \nCamelia in Bambous, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Housing \nDevelopment Company Ltd., information as to – \n\n39 \n \n(a) \nthe number of unoccupied units thereat, and  \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given for the installation of Safe City Surveillance \nCameras thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that there are two housing \nestates at La Valette, Bambous. The first one, La Valette Integrated Village, comprising 199 \nhousing units, was implemented by the National Empowerment Foundation and completed in \n2010.  \nThe second housing estate, comprising 223 housing units, also known as Résidence \nCamelia, was initiated by Government in the context of the rehabilitation of the La Ferme \nDam, to relocate some 200 families residing in the vicinity of the dam. This project was \nimplemented by the NHDC and completed in June 2024. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a), I am informed by the Ministry of \nSocial Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity and the NDC that there is no \nunoccupied housing unit at La Valette Integrated Village and Résidence Camelia, \nrespectively. \nAs regards part (b), I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that 17 intelligent \nvideo surveillance cameras (VSC) and two intelligent traffic surveillance cameras have been \ninstalled in the region of Bambous. Three out of the 17 intelligent VSCs are located in La \nValette, namely near Winners Supermarket, La Valette Industrial Park and the day care \ncentre within La Valette Integrated Village.  \nThe Commissioner of Police has also informed that, in the event of the implementation \nof the second phase of the Safe City Project, consideration may indeed be given to the \ninstallation of surveillance cameras at Résidence Camelia as well as in the other regions of La \nValette. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member! \nMr Babajee: I have been informed that there are several unoccupied houses over there. \nI will ask the Minister if he can carry an inquiry in regard to those houses as we have been \ninformed that il y a des barons de la drogue là-bas. The houses are being used as their place \nof transactions in Résidence Camelia. \n\n40 \n \nMr Mohamed: I thank the hon. Member for the question. Now, if the hon. Member has \ninformation, first and foremost, I would like him to share it with me in confidence. I may \nunderstand that he does not want to put his life at risk by going to the Police himself, but I \nwill. So, please, let me know and I will try to do the needful. \nHowever, from the information that I have, none of the houses are unoccupied. But I \nwill add again, maybe, they are being occupied by the people you say. I will look into it. \nPlease, do not hesitate to give me the information. We will look into it.  \nOn Wednesdays, when we receive our mandants, I have also received people from your \nown constituency who have requested that they be given the opportunity of using one of these \nhouses because they feel that they should have obtained one of those houses. I have looked \ninto it to try to do them justice. Unfortunately, I have been told that none of them are \nunoccupied. But I will keep on looking into it to try to do justice for these people. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Members, the Table has been advised that PQ B/602 has \nbeen withdrawn. \nHon. Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien! \nMAHEBOURG WATERFRONT – JETTY & WALKING SPACE – RENOVATION & \nSAFETY MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/601",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 601,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/601) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Mahebourg Waterfront, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether consideration will be \ngiven for the – \n(a) \nrenovation thereof, especially, of the damaged and closed steel jetty, and  \n(b) \nreserved walking space thereof to be secured against the hazards posed by cars \nand motorcycles driving through same.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the hon. Member that the jetty \nlocated at Mahebourg Waterfront is owned by Landscope Mauritius Ltd. and is managed and \nmaintained by the District Council of Grand Port, given that the esplanade and its auxiliaries, \nof approximate extent of 5 arpents, have been vested into the then Ministry of Local \nGovernment and Outer Islands. \n\n41 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, the steel jetty has been \nclosed for a considerable period of time due to its deteriorated and unsafe condition. The \nDistrict Council of Grand Port has proposed its permanent replacement using reinforced \nconcrete substructure, which will cost significantly less compared to the alternative of rust-\nresistant inox materials. The estimated cost for this replacement project is approximately \nRs25 million. We will liaise with the Ministry of Environment to obtain the necessary \nclearance for this proposed reinforced concrete replacement in line with the prevailing \nregulatory requirements. \nAs regards to part (b) of the question, I wish to reassure the House that temporary in-\nhouse safety measures were immediately implemented by the District Council to protect \npedestrians from any hazard. These measures include the placement of bollards, galvanized \npipes and chains along the esplanade to prevent trespassing by motorcycles and to ensure the \nwalking space for public use.  \nI am further informed that these works started on 01 July 2025 and are expected to be \ncompleted by the end of July 2025, covering a length of approximately 50 metres. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as for the permanent works, the implementation of security \nfeatures across the reserved walking space, which includes the maintenance of paving bricks \nand alleys, lighting, metal structures and handrails, drains and footpaths, has been estimated \nat Rs10 million. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is regrettable that despite a request for financial clearance \nsubmitted as far back as March 2023, no concrete action has been taken by the previous \ngovernment to resolve this matter. \nOur government is committed to deliver practical, sustainable and timely solutions. We \nwill ensure that the renovation and security improvements at Mahebourg Waterfront are \ncarried out efficiently for the safety, comfort and benefit of the public. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member! \nMr Apollon: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Can I know from the hon. Minister, \nwith regard to the steel jetty, when will the works start? \n\n42 \n \nMr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I already mentioned that an estimated cost for \nthis replacement project is approximately Rs25 million. So, we are liaising with the Ministry \nof Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change to have the clearance and \nthen we can start. \nBEAU PLAN – MORCELLEMENT LE HAMEAU – EIA LICENCES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/602",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 602,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/602) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the plot of land situated at Beau \nPlan, known as Morcellement Le Hameau, he will state if the promoter/s thereof has/have \nbeen issued with Environment Impact Assessment Licences in respect thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle! \nMAURITIAN ECONOMY – FATF’S GREY LIST & EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S \nBLACK LIST – BAD PRESS & DAMAGES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/603",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 603,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/603) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the \nplacing in May 2020 of Mauritius on the Grey list of the Financial Action Task Force as \n“Jurisdiction under increased monitoring”, Black list of the European Commission as “High \nrisk third countries” and list of “High risk third countries” by the United Kingdom on March \n2021, she will state why the outgoing Government and the then Minister of Financial \nServices failed to take appropriate timely measures despite warnings to avoid the above \nlistings and prevent the image of Mauritius from bad press and damages to the Mauritian \neconomy.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ms Jeetun: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that as a member of the Eastern \nand Southern Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group (ESAAMLG), Mauritius endorsed the \nrevised international standards on combatting money-laundering and the financing of \nterrorism and proliferation issued by Financial Action Task Force (FATF) in February 2012. \nIn this respect, Mauritius underwent a mutual evaluation of its Anti-Money Laundering and \nCombatting the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) systems and procedures using the \nmethodology for assessing technical compliance with the FATF Recommendations and the \neffectiveness of AML/CFT systems adopted by the FATF in February 2013. \n\n43 \n \nThe mutual evaluation process started in October 2016 and was completed with the \npublication of the Mauritius Mutual Evaluation Report (MER) in September 2018. The \nmutual evaluation which as conducted by ESAAMLG highlighted the areas of weaknesses in \nthe AML/CFT legal and institutional framework of Mauritius. While Mauritius was rated \nlargely compliant or compliant in only 14 of the 40 FATF Recommendations, on the other \nhand, Mauritius was rated partially compliant or non-compliant with 26 recommendations. \nShortcomings were observed in relation to a number of FATF recommendations. In terms of \neffectiveness, the FATF adopted an approach focusing on a hierarchy of 11 defined outcomes. \nMauritius was found to have either a low or a moderate level of effectiveness against the 11 \nimmediate outcomes. The country achieved moderate effectiveness in 4 of the 11 immediate \noutcomes. \nFollowing the publication of the Mutual Evaluation Report in September 2018, \nMauritius was placed under enhanced follow-up process in line with the ESAAMLG \nprocedures for mutual evaluation and follow-up process. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that after the observation period of one year, \nfrom October 2018 to October 2019, the FATF International Corporation Review Group \n(ICRG), accessed the progress made by Mauritius and considered that since the completion of \nthe MER in 2018, while Mauritius had made some progress on some of its MER \nrecommended action to improve technical compliance, the ICRG determined that not all \nstrategic deficiencies had been fully addressed. Mauritius was, therefore, placed on the FATF \nlist of jurisdictions under increased monitoring in February 2020 with an agreed action plan \nto address the strategic deficiencies identified in its AML/CFT regime. \nMauritius was subsequently added to the European Union list of High Risk Third \nCountries on 07 May 2020, and in addition, to mirror the FATF list of jurisdictions under \nincreased monitoring, the UK also included Mauritius in its list of High Risk Third Countries \nin March 2021. In fact, as stated in the Mutual Evaluation Report, published by the \nESAAMLG, in September 2018, Mauritius was rated non-compliant or partly compliant on \n26 out of the 40 FATF recommendations with significant shortcomings in risk assessment, \nsupervision and beneficial ownership transparency. \nMoreover, the Report concluded that the country has a low level of effectiveness in 7 \nout of 11 immediate outcomes, notably in the areas of understanding of money-laundering \nrisk, financial supervision, investigation and prosecution and implementation of targeted \n\n44 \n \nfinancial sanctions. These findings triggered the ICRG referral process with Mauritius \nentering a one-year observation period. \nRegrettably, that one-year period was not optimally used. Instead of marshalling \nresources and driving through the necessary reforms, the previous government remained \npassive, allowing momentum to slip away and public trust to erode. \nThe international consequences were swift. As the European Commission explained in \nits official notice on 07 May 2020, Mauritius has strategic deficiencies in its anti-money \nlaundering and counter-terrorism financing regime that pose significant threats to the \nfinancing system of the Union. Similarly, the UK in its 26th March 2021 Regulatory Update \njustified Mauritius’ inclusion on its high-risk list by stating – \n“This jurisdiction poses increased risk due to strategic deficiencies in their AML/CFT \nregime and has been identified by the FATF as requiring increased monitoring.’’ \nThese listings, unfortunately tarnished the reputation of the Mauritius International Financial \nCentre, created market uncertainty and placed investment clause and correspondent banking \nrelationship under strain. The damage to our global image and economic prospect was real \nand avoidable, and the negative image is still prevalent globally until today.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I must add that since I assume duty as Minister of Financial \nServices and Economic Planning, one of my priorities has been to sustain the trust of our \ninternational partners. While we cannot undo the economic and reputational harm caused, we \nbelieved that with decisive leadership, Mauritius can and will uphold the highest international \nstandards. And in response to the continuously evolving AML/CFT/CPF landscape by key \ndrivers such as emerging risk and development at the level of FATF, my Ministry has \nembarked on the following measures aimed at strengthening the National AML/CFT/CPF \nFramework and ensuring sustain alignment with revised international standards – \n• \nFirstly, participation in ESAAMLG meetings and attending the FATF plenary \nmeetings to keep abreast of development at the level of FATF. \n• \nSecondly, conducting comprehensive risk assessments to identify and understand \nemerging risk and take necessary measures to mitigate identified risk. In this \nrespect, the Ministry is currently conducting the money-laundering and terrorism \nfinancing risk assessment of legal persons and legal arrangements. The terrorist \n\n45 \n \nfinancing risk assessment are non-profit organisation and the first proliferation \nfinancing risk assessment of the country.  \n• \nWe are also implementing capacity building programmes for competent \nauthorities. For instance, my Ministry has recently organised an intensive 5-day \nassessors’ training which was facilitated by experts from the ESAAMLG \nSecretariat. We are also undertaking… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Can you conclude, please. If you want to circulate the answer \nbecause there are a lot of questions. \nDr. Ms Jeetun: I have nearly finished, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Just one last paragraph. \nThe Deputy Speaker: It has been a long answer. \nDr. Ms Jeetun: I just want to add that in parallel, besides working on improving our \nsystems, we are also undertaking a branding and promotional campaign to reinforce the brand \nimage of Mauritius as a jurisdiction of substance and remove any negative perception about \nthe reputation of the country.  \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: You have a question even with this clear answer? Yes, come on! \nPut your question! \nMr Seeburn: Now we know that Mauritius was downgraded by the European \nCommission in 2020 … \nThe Deputy Speaker: Question! Question! Put your question! \nMr Seeburn: … despite the advance warning given. Can the hon. Minister inform the \nHouse whether the grey listing had any adverse on the business activity in the sector? \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Briefly! You have already replied to that but … \nDr. Ms Jeetun: In terms of numbers, definitely, there was a drop in the number of new \nglobal business companies being incorporated during the period 2020-2021 when the \nnumbers went drastically down.  \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: You have one question? \n\n46 \n \nMr Rookny: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Could the hon. Minister please \nadvise when the next review of Mauritius is due and what are the strategic deficiencies that \nyou referred to in your answer as mentioned by FATF? \nDr. Ms Jeetun: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the next mid-term evaluation is in 2027 and \nthe second National Risk Assessment Report that we have released recently, comprises a list \nof deficiencies that have been identified and on which my Ministry is working with all the \ncompetent authorities to make sure that the country is ready for the next mid-term evaluation.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay.  \nHon. Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil. \nMAURITIUS TOURISM PROMOTION AUTHORITY – MR S.R. – OVERSEAS \nMISSIONS – COST INCURRED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/604",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 604,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. B/604) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Tourism whether, in regard to the official overseas missions funded by the \nMauritius Tourism Promotion Authority (MTPA) since 2014 to 2024, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the MTPA, information as to the number thereof in which Mr S.R. \nparticipated, giving a breakdown of the cost incurred in relation thereto in each case.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Energy and Public Utilities (Mr P. Assirvaden) :  M. le président, \navec votre permission, je vais répondre à cette question. On m’informe que de 2016 à 2024, il \ny a eu une collaboration très étroite, voir exclusive entre la MTPA et Maradiva et Mauriplage \ndont Monsieur S.R et ses proches parents sont actionnaires.  \nAn hon. Member: Who is S.R? \nMr Assirvaden : S.R. Monsieur Sanjiv Ramdanee ! \nCette proximité, M. le président, a permis à Maradiva, Mauriplage et Dhyanavartam de \nbénéficier d’un traitement de faveur et de privilège indue de la part de la MTPA. Par \nexemple, M. le président, Maradiva et Mauriplage, en partenariat exclusif avec la MTPA, ont \nparticipé à plusieurs événements couteux à l’étranger où des fonds publics ont été dépensés \nsans aucun bénéfice pour la MTPA ni pour la destination mauricienne.  \nAn hon. Member : Incroyable ! \nMr Assirvaden: Ces évènements comprennent, M. le président – tenez-vous bien – le \nRoyal Ascot qui est un évènement hippique, destiné à l’élite au Royaume Uni. On se rappelle \n\n47 \n \nencore du fameux, Monsieur S.R, habillé comme le Duke anglais, à nos frais, cigare en main, \ns’il vous plaît ! \nLa MTPA, avec l’approbation de son conseil d’administration, a participé avec \nMaradiva-Mauriplage à cet évènement en 2016, 2019, 2022, 2024. \nDes accords ont même été signés pour le partage des dépenses de participation entre la \nMTPA et Maradiva. \nMs Anquetil: Les détails ! \nMr Assirvaden: Mais le hic, M. le président, c’est que sauf pour 2022, la part de coût à \nla MTPA a été versée à Maradiva plutôt qu’à l’organisateur ! \n(Interruptions) \nPourquoi Maradiva ? L’ancien directeur de la MTPA devra s’expliquer. Je dépose, M. \nle président, une liste de ces paiements qui s’élèvent à … \n(Interruptions) \nMs Anquetil : Donne les détails ! \nMr Assirvaden: Je laisse durer le plaisir… \nR 5,665,591.75 et l’honorable membre de l’’opposition posait des questions ce matin \nsur ce qui est vrai…  \nIl est choquant ! \n(Interruptions) \nMs Anquetil : Quel culot ! \nMr Assirvaden: Il est choquant de constater qu’à ce jour, la MTPA ignore totalement – \nje répète la question pour ceux qui ont manqué – il est choquant de constater qu’à ce jour, la \nMTPA ignore totalement si Maradiva a versé ces R5 million et quelques à l’organisateur ! \nElle ignore également si Maradiva a honoré son engagement concernant les 50% \nrestant, la seule preuve documentaire disponible à la MTPA et la confirmation par Maradiva \nde la réception du montant que la MTPA lui a versée.  \n(Interruptions) \nMs Anquetil : Honteux ! Honteux ! \n\n48 \n \nMr Assirvaden : M. le président, la Chambre notera également, qu’en 2024, l’année \ndernière, juste avant les élections, la MTPA a envoyé le paiement de son représentant \npermanant au Royaume Uni. Cependant, pour des raisons inconnues, le paiement de 25,000 \nlivres sterling a ensuite été reversé à Maradiva ! \nMs Anquetil : Scandaleux ! Révoltant ! \nMr Assirvaden: M. le président, … \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Let’s listen to the answer, please. Very interesting one. \nMr Assirvaden: M. le président, l’édition 2024 de la Coupe du Monde de Snow Polo – \nje ne savais même pas qu’il existait un Coup du Monde de Snow Polo – qui s’est tenue en \nSuisse du 26 au 28 février 2024 est un autre événement qui s’est déroulé en partenariat \nexclusif avec Maradiva. \nSelon la MTPA, … \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Maranissa! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Assirvaden: Selon la MTPA, l’ancien directeur avait, sans l’approbation de son \nconseil d’administration, réservé un espace pour participer à l’évènement au nom de la \nMTPA et de Maradiva, également. \nCependant, ils se sont retirés de l’évènement au dernier moment. L’organisateur \npoursuit actuellement uniquement la MTPA pour non-paiement de R 2.7 millions.  \nM. le président, la liste est longue ; je suis également informé que l’ancien directeur de \nla MTPA avait versé la somme d’un peu plus de R360,000 pour sa participation et celle de \nmonsieur S.R, M. Ramdanee, à la conférence et aux évènements du Financial Time Global \nqui s’est tenu le 05 février 2020, à partir de la carte de crédit mise à sa disposition par la \nMTPA.  \nCe paiement étant non-autorisé est … \nMs Anquetil: Profiteur !  \nMr Assirvaden: … notamment pour le compte d’une tierce. La Financial Crimes \nCommission a ouvert une enquête à ce sujet ! \n\n49 \n \nMs Anquetil:  Normale ! \nMr Assirvaden: Ce n’est pas fini, M. le président, malheureusement. Comment la \nChambre peut-elle oublier la 13ème édition – ça aussi je ne savais pas – de la Maradiva White \nParty? \n(Interruptions) \nEt tout cela… \nMr Jhummun: Ek sa bann pe fer nou leson la ein ! \nMr Assirvaden: … c’est l’argent de la population ! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Jhummun: Pa ti dir pa pe kapav pey pension. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay. Carry on with your answer!  \n(Interruptions) \nMr Assirvaden: De la Maradiva White Party, qui s’est tenue en octobre 2024, juste à \nla veille des élections générales… \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Order! \nMr Assirvaden: …au cour de laquelle, la MTPA a dépensé R 450, 000 pour faire venir \nquatre coco-girls danseuses ! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Order! Order! \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members: La honte! Shame! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Order! Carry on, hon. Minister! \nLet’s listen to the answer, please! \nMr Assirvaden: La MTPA a dépensé R 450, 000, je vous disais, M. le président, pour \nfaire venir quatre coco-girls danseuses de l’Europe de l’Est ! \nMr Mohamed: Habillées en orange ! \n\n50 \n \nMr Assirvaden: De plus, l’identités et cela je n’arrive pas à comprendre –l’identités de \nces danseuses ont été falsifiées…  \n(Interruptions) \nEt elles ont été présentées comme des journalistes influenceurs médiatiques.  \n(Interruptions) \nOutre ce qui précède, M. le président, au-delà de ce qu’on entend, il faut bien le dire, \nM. le président, c’est l’argent de la population, l’argent du peuple qui a été gaspillé. Outre ce \nqui précède, les coco-girls, ça a frôlé la prostitution.  \n(Interruptions) \nMr Assirvaden: En 2021, la MTPA a également financé des billets d’avion pour un \nvoyage de presse au nom de Maradiva encore une fois.  \nAn hon. Member: Ankor! \nMr Assirvaden: La Chambre souhaiterait peut-être noter que toutes les dépenses \nsusmentionnées, qui sont hautement douteuses et contestables, font actuellement l’objet d’une \nenquête de la Financial Crimes Commission. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you.  Only one question before we break for lunch. \nMr Beechook: I thank the hon. Minister for his extensive reply. C’est clair que la \nMTPA était l’agence de voyage personnel de Monsieur S.R. I would like to know, if he has \nthe details, whether the MTPA has paid for Gala Tickets at the Saint-Moritz Snow Polo \nTournament which includes Perrier champagne – je ne bois pas trop – cigar lounge and \nunlimited champagne bars? \n Mr Assirvaden: M. le président, ce n’est pas mon ministère. On parle de l’édition \n2024 de la Coupe du monde de snow polo qui s’est déroulée en Suisse. Le renseignement de \nl’honorable membre est sûrement vrai. Merci. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, thank you.  \nI suspend the Sitting for one and a half hour. \nAt 1.08 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.39 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Please be seated!  \n\n51 \n \nThe hon. First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne Longue! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 4 – PIPE LAYING IMPACT – ROADS REINSTATEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/605",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 605,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/605) Ms A. Savabaddy (Port Louis North & Montagne Longue) asked the \nMinister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the pipe laying works \nundertaken in Constituency No 4, Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to when the \nroads damaged in the course thereof will be reinstated, indicating the timeframe set therefor, \nif any. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Minister!",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: M. le président, je suis informé par la Central Water Authority que des \ntravaux de pose de tuyaux ont été entrepris dans quelques régions de la circonscription no. 4, \nà savoir Port Louis Nord-Montagne Longue, dans les régions de Montagne Longue, Notre \nDame, Cité La Cure, Sainte-Croix, Roche Bois, Vallée des Prêtres. \nM. le président, je suis également informé que la réintégration permanente est en cours \nsur ces routes. D’abord, à Montagne Longue, 6.6 km sur un total de 8.6 km ont déjà été \nrefaits. Les 2 km restants, principalement des déroutes de la RDA, devraient être terminés \nd’ici fin septembre 2025. À Cité La Cure, Sainte-Croix, Roche Bois et Vallée des Prêtres, la \nréfection permanente des routes devrait être achevée d’ici fin juillet 2025. \nM. le président, en fait, dans la région de Sainte-Croix, il reste environ 200 m de tuyaux \nsur les 4.8 km à réaliser d’ici la fin de ce mois. Concernant la réfection des routes, 2.2 km sur \n3 km de routes municipales ont déjà été réalisés. Les sections restantes devraient être \nachevées en octobre 2025. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle! \nCLUNY & BANANES – FOOTBALL PITCHES REINSTATEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/606",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 606,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/606) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the football pitches in Cluny \nand Bananes, he will state if consideration will be given for the reinstatement thereof and \nprovision of lighting facilities thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Cluny Football Ground, covering \napproximately 3600m2, is being upgraded under a contract amounting to Rs1,725,000, \n\n52 \n \ninclusive of VAT. The contract was awarded to Sonallal & Sons Building Contractor Ltd on \n10 January 2023.  \nThe scope of works includes – \n• levelling; \n• compaction; \n• top soil placement, and \n• grass planting. \nThe initial completion date was set up for 07 August 2023, but was extended to 29 May \n2024 due to implementation short comings. The District Council of Grand Port did not accept \nthe works because of defects and requested remedial actions.  \nAlthough the project was finalised in April 2025, further levelling and grass replanting \nwere still required. Subsequently, liquidated damages are being imposed at Rs2500 per day \nup to a maximum of 10% of the contract value. The contractor has been instructed to \ncomplete outstandings works by end of August 2025. \nAs for lighting, the National Development Unit (NDU) installed the system during \n2020-2021. However, the main distribution panel was vandalised on 24 July 2023 and all the \nelectrical fixtures and fittings were stolen. The District Council is reinstating the lighting \nsystem through in-house labour at an estimated cost of Rs75,000 with completion expected \nby mid-August 2025. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, similarly, the Bananes Football Ground, covering \napproximately 6400m2, is being upgraded under the same contract as Cluny at the cost of \nRs1,725,000, inclusive of VAT.  \nThe works involve – \n• soil levelling and compaction; \n• placing four inches of top soil, and \n• grass planting with proper spacing. \nMaintenance includes – \n• watering; \n• fertilising, and \n• replacing dead grasses. \n\n53 \n \nDue to similar shortcomings in levelling ang grass planting, remedial works were \nrequired and the contractor has been asked to complete these by end of August 2025. The \nlighting system at Bananes Football Ground was installed by the District Council of Grand \nPort in 2020. Following financial clearance from the NDU, additional civil works and \nbleachers were completed in year 2019 and 2022 while lighting facilities exist. \nLack of proper maintenance by the council has been an issue. Bulk replacement is \nbeing carried out by in-house teams and will be completed shortly.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to highlight that poor maintenance of such amenities by \ncouncils continues to cause undue hardship to our citizens. To address these \nissues/shortcomings, a circular letter will be issued to all Chief Executives of the local \nauthorities urging urgent resolution of maintenance issues. \nFurthermore, the former government bears responsibility for delays in project \ncompletion due to its fragmented approach. Instead of entrusting a single contractor for \ncomprehensive upgrades, contracts were split between the NDU and the local authorities \nresulting in lack of coordination and prolonged incompletion. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d'Or!  \nWORKSHOPS (MOTOR VEHICLES) – HEALTH & SAFETY INSPECTIONS (2014-\n2024)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/607",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 607,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/607) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to workplace inspections \ncarried out at the premises where repairs of motor vehicles and motorcycles are effected over \nthe period December 2014 to November 2024, he will state the – \n(a) \nnumber thereof annually and table the list thereof, and \n(b) \nnames of the employers prosecuted for breaches of the Occupational Safety and \nHealth Act 2005, indicating in each case, the relevant section under which each \none was prosecuted.",
      "answer": "Mr Uteem: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the officers of the National \nOccupational Safety and Health Department that they carry out visits at places of work, \nincluding workshops where mechanical repairs are carried out for motor vehicles and motor \ncycles, to ensure that the health and safety standards are met in accordance with the \nprovisions of the Occupational Safety and Health Act 2005. \n\n54 \n \nFollowing visits carried at places of work, appropriate recommendation is issued to the \nemployers in accordance with Section 24 (5) of the OSH Act 2005. Follow-up visits are \nthereafter carried out to verify compliance. In case of repeated non-compliance, \ncontraventions are established and the employers are prosecuted in accordance with Section \n26 of the Act. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that for the period December \n2014 to November 2024, 434 visits were undertaken by officers of the National Occupational \nSafety and Health Department. 191 out of 230 premises are registered with NOSH as \nfactories where activities in connection with repairs of motor vehicles and motor cycles are \ncarried out.  \nI am tabling the list of the inspections carried out for each year, from 2014 to 2025. \nAs regard to part (b) of the question, I am further informed that as at date, eight \nemployers involved in repair of motor vehicles and motor cycles have been prosecuted for \nbreaches under relevant sections OSH Act 2005, namely sections 5, 10, 23, 85, 87, 88 and \n105. I am also tabling the list of the employers who have been sanctioned under the Act. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you have a supplementary question? \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Could the hon. Minister inform the \nHouse what additional measures will be taken to ensure the safety and health of employees in \nthis sector, especially given that there has been a significant rise in the number of vehicles for \nthe past ten years? \nMr Uteem: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have to confess that I am also not satisfied with \nthe number of visits carried out by the inspection of my Ministry because over the past 10 \nyears, approximately less than 20% of workshops are inspected every year. But \nunfortunately, we have a constraint of labour inspectors and in the Enforcement Department. \nWe have asked for additional staff and we will try our best to conduct more inspections of \nworkshops. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil! \nBUS ROUTES 53, 26 & 221 – IRREGULARITIES – REMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/608",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 608,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/608) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to bus routes 53, 26 and 221, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information as to \n\n55 \n \nthe remedial measures undertaken or envisaged to ensure regular and reliable public transport \nservices along same.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I informed by the NLTA that bus \nroute 26, Belmont Traffic Centre to Central Flacq via Roche Noire, and route 53, Belmont \nTraffic Centre to Central Flacq via Amaury and Laventure are served by buses owned by \nindividual bus owners. \nPreviously, 19 buses were licensed to operate along these two routes. However, in 2006 \none bus was transferred to route 106 which is Flacq-Port Louis while a second bus which had \nremained off the road since May 2020 had its road service licence lapsed. Thus, the fleet \nalong these routes were reduced to 17 buses. \nI am apprised that with a view to addressing this shortfall, two short-term RSL licences \nwere granted in October 2023 and August 2024, respectively. As at present, buses are \nreleased every 20 minutes from both terminals to serve both routes, alternatively, throughout \nthe day. The fleet also caters for seven school trips and two short services on school days. \nFurthermore, buses on these routes also transit via Poudre D’Or Hospital at designated time \nof the day. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the NLTA that the routes 26 and 53 have \nindeed been subject to recurrent complaints particularly when scheduled trips are missed due \nto one or more buses being off-road due to breakdowns and unavailability of spare buses for \nreplacement or simply, due to operators opting not to provide the service which is a recurrent \nhappening. It is to be pointed out that a high number of these buses are more one 17 years old \nand are thus often prone to mechanical problems. As a result, strict compliance with timetable \nof operation cannot be observed. Thus, drawing strong complaints from commuters and \nmanagement educational institutions. \nI have seen, with much concern, the video posted on social media by the hon. Member \non Sunday, 29 June 2025 as regard line 26 whereby the last bus did not turn up at the Flacq \nBus Station and 16 passengers were, consequently, left stranded. The Disciplinary Committee \nof the NLTA has been constituted under the chair of Attorney, Ms Aratee Prayag. I will ask \nthe Authority to investigate on this incident as a priority and to ensure that severe action is \ntaken against all those liable. To this effect, regular monitoring is ongoing by the regulator, \nthe NLTA, although it is constrained by significant shortage of inspectorate staffs. \nFurthermore, I wish to reassure the House that the licensing of two additional buses along the \n\n56 \n \nsaid routes is also being contemplated in order to enhance the level of service and to cater for \nemergencies resulting from breakdown of buses. \nComing to route 221 which is part of the question, Haute Rive Traffic Centre, Rivière \ndu Rempart to Central Flacq via Roche Noire, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the NLTA has \napprised that this route was created to serve the inhabitants of Plaines des Roches who \nconverged to Flacq for their social, recreational and economic activities as well as for \nstudents attending educational institutions in Flacq. This route is served daily by individual \nbuses, on a roaster basis, of a fleet of 71 buses operating along routes 106, 109, 111, 176 and \n112 – Flacq to Port Louis. These buses are released at intervals of 20 to 30 minutes during \npeak time and 60 to 70 minutes during off-peak. \nThe service along this route has also been subject to repeated complaints from the \ntravelling public due to dishonest operators failing to run their buses during off peak time. \nChecks are being carried out during the morning and peak time by the inspectorate to ensure \nthe observance of timetable.  \nMoreover, I am made aware that the NLTA will soon have a meeting with the bus \noperators for reviewing the existing established timetable in order to better meet the need of \npassengers. \nFinally, I wish to reiterate with much belief and confidence that malpractices will soon \ncome to an end with the forthcoming introduction of Fleet Management System. At long last, \nwe have a budgetary provision for this in the last budget. \nMeanwhile, I have asked the NLTA to have one of the 11 Management Support \nOfficers to be posted at the Flacq Station to ensure close monitoring. In fact, these 11 MSOs \nhave been entrusted a special assignment to strengthen the NLTA inspectorate pending the \nrecruitment of Road Transport Inspectors as I had extensively explained during my speech on \nthe Budget this year. \nFinally, I would invite the hon. Member, and his other colleagues of the constituency to \nwork in close collaboration with the NLTA for the benefit of the commuters and to feel free \nto liaise with the MSO if need be. \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Yes, hon. Member! \nMr Beechook: I thank the hon. Minister. I will seek your indulgence, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir, because the problem of line 26 and 53 affects strongly students. One child in \n\n57 \n \none month was subject to 14 lateness and very often people who live in areas like Poste La \nFayette and Débarcadère, Poste de Flacq miss the first bus to their workplace and last bus to \ntheir homes.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question! \nMr Beechook: The question to the hon. Minister is that the bus owners also face acute \nshortage to recruit bus drivers. Can the hon. Minister, please, consider the request of allowing \nthe bus industry to recruit foreign bus drivers, instead of going through the painful and \nlengthy work permit process, be prioritized and be eligible to the occupation permit delivered \nwithin weeks by the EDB which will solve the labour problem? \nMr Osman Mahomed: We are doing our level best to facilitate. In fact, I just spoke to \nmy colleague. \nThe Deputy Speaker:  I think it is a question concerning your colleague more than \nyou. \nMr Osman Mahomed: But just for the sake of clarity, if the salary is more than \nRs23,000, this route can be contemplated. \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes! \nELECTRIC BUS PROJECT – CONSULTATION SERVICES – CONTRACT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/609",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 609,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/609) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Electric Bus Project, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Transport Corporation, information as \nto the name of the consultant whose services have been retained therefor, indicating the – \n(a) \nselection process adopted for the appointment thereof, and \n(b) \nterms and conditions of the contract.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the National \nTransport Corporation that in line with the street renewal strategy and the planned \ndeployment of its electric fleet, the consultancy services of Aequalis Consulting Engineers \nCo. Ltd were enlisted on two occasions namely, a first time in 2023, for a feasibility study on \nconsultancy for design and charging system and infrastructure for electric buses across six \nNTC depots, and a second time in 2024. In the interest of time, I am tabling the full scope of \nwork for the initial feasibility study.  \n\n58 \n \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that for the first \ncontract, an invitation for bids was sought by mail on 02 June 2023 through a restricted \nbidding exercise from nine companies. Again, in the interest of time, I am tabling the full list \nof the nine companies. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, at time of closing on 15 June 2023, that is, 13 days later, only \none bid was received which was evaluated and recommended by the Bid Evaluation \nCommittee. The then management submitted its bid to the Board of the NTC for approval on \n19 June 2023, that is, four days later. \nThe next day, on 20 June 2023, a Letter of Award was subsequently issued to Aequalis \nConsulting Engineers Co. Ltd for the sum of Rs1.725 million VAT inclusive. I am informed \nthat these 18 days it took to invite for bids, evaluate, approve and award, is a record indeed at \nthe NTC for procurement of such nature. \nThe House may wish to note that works as per above contract was deemed completed \nby the then management of the NTC and payment was effected to Aequalis Consulting \nEngineers Co. Ltd on 07 September 2023, that is, some two months later. \nAs regard the second contract, I am informed that following the recommendations of \nthe then management, the NTC Board approved on 29 July 2024 that for continuity of \nconsultancy services, Aequalis Consulting Engineers Company Ltd be resorted, inter alia, for \nadditional services in respect of preparation of bidding documents, quantity surveying \nservices, evaluation of bids and commissioning of works for the setting up of charging \ninfrastructure for electric buses. As at date, a sum of Rs225,000 has been paid to the \nconsultant for the second contract out of a total of Rs685,000 which I am informed, was the \nceiling provided under the procurement laws for extension of contract. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, for the first contract, I \nam informed that the conditions were as per the Letter of award. For the second contract, I \nam informed by the NTC that the second order bearing No. 83275 was issued on 23 August \n2024 to Aequalis Consulting Engineers Company Ltd to carry out consultancy services as per \nquoted price of Rs685,000. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards the hon. Member’s specific question on terms and \nconditions, I am afraid I cannot possibly provide any more details as I am informed that the \nthen management under former General Manager, Mr Rao Ramah did not sign any contract \nwith the said consultant for the extension, that is, the second extension. \n\n59 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, because of this awkward situation of the NTC inherited from \nMr Ramah, there is today, a problematic situation where the design of Aequalis Consulting \nEngineers Company Ltd and that, being proposed by the contractor appointed by the Indian \nside which is Switch Mobility from India are not attuned because they diverge. This has led \nto a huge delay in the process to the point that I had to chair a meeting on 3 July 2025, during \nwhich I had given an ultimatum to Aequalis Consulting Engineers Company Ltd to complete \nits part of the contract, that is, the extension that awarded on a mere service order. Aequalis \nConsulting Engineers has undertaken to complete all the works, all the documents by the end \nof this week. \nAs a last note, this delay has already caused a setback in the operations of the 100 \nelectric buses by the National Transport Corporation. Thank you. \nMs Anquetil: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, one supplementary. \nMs Anquetil: So important, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nI thank you very much, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. It would appear that the extension of \nthe original contract deviates seriously from the good governance practices. Will the Minister \ninform the House – clarify – how the NTC intends to proceed without a proper signed \ncontract outlining the terms and conditions? Thank you. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes, it is a bit too much too late because the contract was not \nsigned but I had called them at the office on 3 July and I have asked them for national interest \nthey have to complete this project because the 100 buses from India, 10 of them have already \narrived and the rest are awaiting the completion of these works to be able to shift and balance \nof 90. \nMs Anquetil: A last one please! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Go ahead. \nMs Anquetil: I thank you very much, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Would the Minister \ninform the House the actions being taken to charge the electric buses with renewable energy? \nThank you. \nMr Osman Mahomed: I thank the hon. Member for this very pertinent question. \nIndeed, electric vehicles are more polluting in Mauritius, I said it during the PNQ. I have \nstarted discussions with the Global Environment Fund in order to secure funds and facilities \n\n60 \n \nto install solar photovoltaic panels on the rooftop of the NTC depot so that we can mitigate \nthe environmental impact. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite \nRivière! \nMAURITIUS SPORTS COUNCIL – BOARD COMPOSITION – ALLOWANCES & \nBENEFITS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/610",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 610,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/610) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Mauritius Sports Council, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the names of the Chairperson and other \nmembers of the board thereof, indicating in each case, the – \n(a) \nmonthly allowances and benefits drawn, and \n(b) \nexperience thereof in the field of sports.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the present Board of the Mauritius Sports \nCouncil was constituted on 17 January 2025. I am tabling the composition thereof along with \nthe monthly allowances and benefits drawn by each member. The document also indicates the \nexperience expressed by the respective members. \nMr Quirin: M. le président, l’honorable ministre peut-il dire à la Chambre si parmi les \nmembres du Board du Mauritius Sports Council, il y a des politiciens engagés activement ? \nSi oui, si tel est le cas, de nous donner leur noms et nous dire les fonctions politiques qu’ils \noccupent. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Mo mem mo kav dir li. Li pa ti politisien li! Vermine li! \nMr Quirin: Ki vermine? Pran to koze al to lakaz do ta!  \nMr Nagalingum: If you want to know… \n(Interruptions) \nMr Quirin: Ki ariv twa! Ki vermine? Respekte to prochain. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay. Listen to the Minister! \nMr Quirin: Vermine! Incroyable! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Quirin, do you want to… \n(Interruptions) \n\n61 \n \nLet us listen to the answer. You asked a question, let us have the answer! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Quirin: Ki be be be? Ki? Mo per twa mwa to krwar? \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Get twa dan laglas! \nMr Quirin: Ey twa ki bizin al get twa dan laglas! Si to ena kouraz al get twa! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Order! \nMr Quirin: Si to ena kouraz al get twa dan laglas! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Quirin! \nMr Quirin: Yes? \nThe Deputy Speaker: No cross talking please! Listen to the answer! \nMr Nagalingum: Yes, he put a question. The Chairman appointed by the Minister is \nMr Iqbal Calcateea, Chairperson of the Mauritius Sports Council. He is an active politician, \nyes. \nMr Quirin: M. le président, la Sports Act interdit aux dirigeants de fédérations de faire \nde la politique active. Le ministre peut-il dire à la Chambre pourquoi cette règle n’est pas \napplicable dans le cas du Mauritius Sports Council où justement il vient de le dire, siège M. \nCalcateea qui occupe la présidence ? Peut-on savoir ? On est en train de politiser le sport. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question! \nMr Quirin: Oui  \nThe Deputy Speaker: What is the question? \nMr Quirin: Il aurait dû écouter, M. le président. Le ministre peut-il dire à la Chambre \npourquoi cette règle qui consiste à interdire aux dirigeants des fédérations de faire de la \npolitique active, pourquoi cette règle n’est pas applicable au Mauritius Sports Council ? \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay. Hon. Minister? \nMr Nagalingum: Yes, you listen well. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry has sought \nlegal advice from the Attorney General’s Office on this matter as far back as 2 April 2025.  \n\n62 \n \nThe advice was as follows: section 16(c)(iii) of the Local Government Act provides, inter \nalia, that – \n“No person shall be qualified to be elected, or nominated, as a Municipal City \nCouncillor, Municipal Town Councillor (…) where he – \n(c) \nis the holder of, or is acting in, an office of emolument – \n(iii) a statutory corporation or an organisation wholly funded by the State other \nthan as the chairperson or member of the governing body of that \ncorporation or organisation wholly funded by the State;” \nIn the light of the above provision, the Chairperson and members of the Mauritius \nSports Council are eligible to stand as candidate for the forthcoming elections, that is, a \nCouncillor can be nominated as Chairperson for the Mauritius Sports Council. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \nM1, M2 & M3 MOTORWAYS – GRADE-SEPARATED JUNCTIONS CONVERSION \n– PROJECT DETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/611",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 611,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/611) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the roundabouts \non the M1, M2 and M3 motorways, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nRoad Development Authority, the list thereof earmarked for conversion into Grade-Separated \nJunctions to alleviate traffic congestion thereat, indicating in each case – \n(a) \nthe scope of works; \n(b) \nthe estimated cost, and  \n(c) \nwhere matters stand as to the implementation of the project.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is a known fact that previously, roundabout \nwere being provided along motorways and main roads to allow conflicting movements across \njunctions. These roundabouts have served their purposes over the years.  \nHowever, over time due to increasing volume of traffic, several of these roundabouts \nare now operating beyond capacity, leading to extensive congestion, long queues and \nincreasing travel times. Accordingly, the Road Development Authority, in line with the \npresent policy to replace roundabouts and junctions with flyovers or Grade-Separated \nJunctions and interchangers, has identified a list of roundabouts which have reached a critical \n\n63 \n \nstage and needful is being done to replace them in a phased manner. It should be highlighted \nthat many developed countries do not have roundabouts along their highways, motorways. I \nam informed by the RDA that a traffic analysis survey including an assessment of the volume \nof traffic and turning movement of vehicles at roundabouts is normally carried out on the \nbasis of which a decision is taken as to whether the roundabout warrants any upgrading. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the RDA that as at date, six roundabouts \nhave already been replaced by Grade-Separated Junctions or flyovers, namely at – \n• \nQuay D; \n• \nWooton; \n• \nSt Pierre Bypass; \n• \nTerre Rouge on motorway M2; \n• \nMotorway M1 at La Vigie, and \n• \nInterchange construction and improvements along M3-A14 corridor at Ebène. \nAdditionally, the RDA has identified four more projects, which are currently at \npreliminary stage, namely – \n• \nFlyover at Camp Fouquereaux; \n• \nFlyover on Motorway M2 at Baie du Tombeau roundabout, Roche Bois; \n• \nFlyover on Motorway M1 at Swami Vivekananda Avenue, Curepipe, and \n• \nFlyover on Motorway M1 at Nouvelle France. \nThese projects are expected to be implemented in the coming financial years. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that the \nscope of works for the grade-separated junctions and flyovers generally involves – \n• technical surveys and investigations;  \n• rerouting and protection of existing services; \n• relocation of monuments; \n• design and construction of the flyover with provision of add-grade slip lanes; \n\n64 \n \n• construction and upgrading of drainage and retaining structures. \nWith your permission, I am tabling the details regarding parts (a), (b) and (c) of the \nquestion. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka! \nDISTRICT COUNCILS – GYMNASIUM INSTRUCTORS – RECRUITMENT & \nALLOWANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/612",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 612,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/612) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the District Councils, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to the Councils having retained \nthe services of zumba, yoga and gym instructors, indicating the number thereof in each case, \nfurther indicating the hourly rate at which they are paid, since when and whether \nconsideration will be given for a revision thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the hon. Member that \ngymnasium instructors, on a part-time basis, are recruited through the Local Government \nService Commission both at the level of District and Municipal Councils.  \nAccording to the Pay Research Bureau (PRB) Report 2021, the monthly allowance \npayable to part-time gymnasium instructors was revised from Rs14,895 to Rs16,610, \nprovided the incumbent performed 27 working hours weekly. \nThe staffing position in the grade is being tabled. \nFurthermore, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, local authorities also retain the services of \ngymnasium instructors on a sessional basis. The instructors are enlisted through an \nexpression of interest with the sessional arrangement typically for a duration ranging from \none and a half hours to two hours.  \nFollowing the publication of the Pay Research Bureau Report 2021 and further to \nrequests made by the local authorities, the Ministry of Public Service and Administrative \nReforms was approached to revise the quantum of allowance payable to instructors of yoga, \nzumba, self-defence and gym enlisted on a sessional basis.  \n\n65 \n \nOn 31 October 2022, the Ministry of Public Service and Administrative Reforms \nrevised the allowance from Rs425 for a session of one and half hours to two hours to Rs475 \nfor a session of one and half hours for instructors enlisted to teach aerobics, badminton, \nkickboxing, tai chi, yoga, and Zumba, where the terms and conditions of employment are \nsimilar. \nI am tabling detailed returns regarding employment of part-time gymnasium instructors \nin the local government service, indicating the number of established posts along with the \nnumber of officers in post as at 31 May 2025. The table also includes the instructors retained \non a sessional basis to teach Zumba and yoga. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, any revision of these rates will be subject to recommendations \nmade in the forthcoming Pay Research Bureau Report. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \nPUBLIC HOSPITALS – CT SCAN & MRI MACHINES – OPERATIONALITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/613",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 613,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/613) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to Magnetic \nResonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) Scan Equipment, he will give \nthe list of the public health institutions equipped therewith, indicating in each case – \n(a) \nthe number thereof presently not operational and the expected date of coming into \noperation thereof, and  \n(b) \nwhen all public health institutions will be equipped therewith.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation (Dr. A. Ramtohul): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with your permission, I will reply to PQ B/613, \naddressed to the hon. Minister of Health and Wellness. \nI am informed that the Ministry has four Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) apparatus \noperating at the following public health institutions. I will go by the common names – \n• \nDr. A.G. Jeetoo Hospital, Port Louis; \n\n66 \n \n• \nSSRN Hospital, Pamplemousses; \n• \nSAJ Hospital, Flacq, and  \n• \nNCC, Solferino. \nOn the other hand, CT scan machines are available at the following health institutions – \n• \n1 at Dr. A.G. Jeetoo Hospital, Port Louis; \n• \n1 SSRN Hospital, Pamplemousses; \n• \n1 Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital, Rose Belle; \n• \n2 at Victoria Hospital, Candos; \n• \n1 at ENT Hospital, Vacoas, and  \n• \n1 at NCC, Solferino. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that out of the four MRI \nequipment in public hospitals, the one at SSRN Hospital and the one at the National Cancer \nCentre are both functional, whereas that of Dr. Jeetoo Hospital is out of order since 12 May \n2025. Spare parts to effect repairs have already been ordered and delivery is expected by end \nof this month. The repairs will then be completed within one week of the receipt of the spare \nparts.  \nAs regards the MRI at SAJ Hospital, the MRI equipment has been delivered on 06 June \n2025, and installation is in progress. Training and commissioning will be done, and the \nmachine will be operational as from August 2025. \nWith regard to the CT scan machines, I am informed that there are seven of them. Out \nof the seven, only two are fully functional – one at Dr. Jeetoo Hospital and one at Victoria \nHospital, whereas those at JNH and ENT Hospital are partly functional.  \nThe status regarding the other three CT scan machines is as follows. It is not a long \nresponse, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Please, allow me to go through it – \n\n67 \n \n• \nAt SSRN Hospital, the equipment encountered problems on 13 May 2025. \nTroubleshooting actually revealed issues with some spare parts, which have now \nbeen ordered, and it will be received by end of this month. It will take one week for \nthe machine to be up and operational. \n• \nAt Victoria Hospital, the CT scan equipment was also faulty. Repairs have been \ncompleted. As we speak, calibration is scheduled. The equipment will be fully \noperational very soon. \n• \nAt the NCC, the contract has been allocated for a comprehensive maintenance. \nToday, again, it is being done. Repairs, as per the problems that are there, will be \neffected within one month after allocation of a contract which is due today. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, the procurement procedures have already been \ninitiated for the procurement of a CT scan apparatus for SAJ Hospital. Procurement, here, Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, is transparent. It is not being done as it used to be done under the MSM \nregime. Moreover, provision has been made in the Budget 2025-2026 for the acquisition of \ntwo additional MRI equipment and two CT scan machines. \nOn an average, as a benchmark, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, for a population of 1.2 \nmillion, we are currently below standard. We are substandard. This is why people who are \nalready suffering and are having to wait for long time, are being transferred from one hospital \nto another so that they can benefit from the services that these equipment deliver. That is just \nfor their own health.  \nTherefore, there was really no focus by the MSM government with regard to the health \nof the nation. What they did was more of a money illusion instead of investing that money in \nthe health of the public. Let me just exemplify. It is very quick, totally related to the question. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The question (b) is simple: “when all public health institutions \nwill be equipped therewith?” Just tell us the lifespan, how many months or how many years, \nif you can.  \nDr. Ramtohul: Yes. \nThe Deputy Speaker: I know you are not the substantive Minister. \n\n68 \n \nDr. Ramtohul: No, I am good with that. I just wanted to add this last bit to conclude. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Conclude! \nDr. Ramtohul: In the first year, we have already ordered equipment so that there is a \n50% increase in the MRI equipment and 30% increase in the CT Scan equipment so that we \ncan deliver better health services, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. \nDr. Ramtohul: So, this shows how much we care about the nation’s health.  \nJust to conclude, with a view mitigate the time frame for the CT scan and MRI reports \nin case of breakdown of equipment, the patient is actually currently being referred to other \nhospitals. This is for us to ensure that the medical services are being deployed. \nThank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. \nHon. Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka! \nZEP SCHOOLS – MEAL PROGRAMME – QUALITY ASSURANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/614",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 614,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/614) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the Supply and \nDistribution of Enhanced Meals to Zones d’Education Prioritaire Schools, he will – \n(a) \ngive the list of the suppliers thereof, indicating in each case, the terms and \nconditions of contract, and  \n(b) \nstate the current measures implemented to ensure quality control of the meals \nsupplied and distributed.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, at the very outset, let me apprise the House \nthat the Enhanced Meal Programme in Zone D’Education Prioritaire Schools, is not only a \nhumane exercise, it is also a powerful tool to address educational equity and social \nempowerment. \n\n69 \n \nI am informed that my Ministry provides Enhanced Meals to 5,292 pupils in the 24 ZEP \nSchools. With regard to part (a) of the question, I am tabling the list of suppliers who are \ninvolved in the provision of these Enhanced Meals along with the terms and conditions of \ntheir contractual obligations. \nAs for part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that there are several \nmeasures to ensure quality control over the meals being served to the 5,292 pupils in the 24 \nZEP Schools. For example, each ZEP school has a Monitoring Committee, composed of both \nteaching and non-teaching personnel responsible for overseeing the quality of the meals \nprovided. Distribution of meals to pupils takes place only when the headmaster has \npersonally certified the standard of the food. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, however, while the vision is clear, I must acknowledge that the \nexecution of those quality control measures has not always kept pace with ambition. An \nInternal Audit Report dated 08 October 2024 revealed serious lapses in the performance of \ncertain service providers, these included – \n• \nrepeated breaches of contract; \n• \ncomplaints over meal quality, and \n• \nunjustifiable delays in delivery,  \nfailures that are wholly unacceptable. \nIt is also to be noted that over the past years, the Ministry has on various occasions \nbeen unsuccessful in finalising a comprehensive bidding exercise for the supply of the \nenhanced meals to all the four Education Zones. Pending the conclusions of a fresh \nprocurement exercise, contracts are presently being extended on a month-to-month basis \nwithout price adjustments. An interim measure that has regrettably exposed the system to \ndeclining service quality due to inflationary pressures. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, these deficiencies were not only flagged internally, but were \nalso echoed loudly at the recent Assises de l’Education. Let me assure the House that this \nGovernment will not condone mediocrity, certainly not when the well-being of our children is \nat stake.  \nAccordingly, decisive corrective action has been already taken to control the quality of \nEnhanced Meals. A fresh open-national bidding exercise was launched last month for the \n\n70 \n \nsupply of Enhanced Meals across the four Zones for both the third term of the academic year \n2025 and the full academic calendar of 2026. The evaluation of bids is on-going for the four \nZones. Unlike in the past, this new procurement exercise is underpinned by rigorous \nperformance benchmarks – \n• \nupdated menus; \n• \nrevised food preparation, and handling protocols; \n• \na strict distribution guidelines, and  \n• \nreinforce monitoring frameworks have all been embedded. \nFurthermore, all personnel deployed in these schools must present a valid Certificate of \nCharacter and a Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point Certificate or ISO 22000 Certificate. I \nam tabling the terms and conditions of these new procurement exercises for 2025. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, since 2019, there was no significant increase in the budget for \nEnhanced Meal Programme. However, in the 2025-2026 Budget, provision has been made to \nincrease the budget from Rs80 million to Rs120 million so that we do not compromise on the \nquality of meals provided to our 5,292 children in 24 ZEP Schools. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nPUBLIC CONCERTS – EVENT ORGANISERS & ARTISTS – TERMS & \nCONDITIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/615",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 615,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/615) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the holding of public concerts by event \norganisers and artists, he will state the terms and conditions applicable thereto, indicating the \nrestrictions, if any, on the publicity/promotion campaign thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Gondeea: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, at the outset, I wish to inform the hon. Member \nand the House that my Ministry is not responsible for processing permits or granting \nclearances for the holding of public concerts by event organisers and artists.  \nThat said, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the organisation of public concert is governed by a \nnumber of laws and regulations, namely – \n\n71 \n \n• \nThe Public Gathering Act 1991; \n• \nThe Public Health (Prohibition on Advertisement, Sponsorship and Restriction on \nSale and Consumption in Public Places of Alcoholic Drinks) (Amendment) \nRegulations 2021; \n• \nThe Environment Protection (Environmental Standards for Noise) Regulations \n2022, and  \n• \nThe Environment Protection (Control of Noise) Regulations 2022. \nClearance is issued solely by the Commissioner of Police, upon an application submitted at \nleast seven days prior to the event with supporting approvals from relevant authorities \nincluding – \n• \nthe Local Authority;  \n• \nthe Beach Authority if applicable;  \n• \nthe Fire Services;  \n• \nthe Ministry of Health and Wellness, and \n• \nthe Mauritius Society of Authors. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, upon approval terms and conditions are imposed by the \nCommissioner of Police. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me also highlight that under the previous government, the \nprocedure for organising public concerts were fragmented, overly bureaucratic and \ndiscouraging. Event organisers and artists were left on their own to navigate a maze of \napprovals, resulting in delays, frustration and frequent cancellations of events. The process \nhindered creativity and suppressed the growth of our cultural economy. Thankfully under the \nvisionary leadership of the hon. Prime Minister, Dr. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, this \nGovernment is committed to bring things differently. \nAs announced in the Government Programme 2025-2029, my Ministry will establish a \ncultural desk that will act as a one-stop shop for concerts organisers and artists. This new \nstructure will be equipped with a dedicated online platform inter-linking all relevant \nauthorities, thereby simplifying the application process, providing step by step guidance on \n\n72 \n \nlegal and regulatory requirements, helping applicants compile necessary documents and \ncoordinating with the relevant institutions to minimise delays and eliminate red tape. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, while legal obligations will remain, the process will become \nsimpler, faster and more transparent. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with this measure, we are \nreplacing bureaucracy with facilitation, confusion with clarity, and hesitation with action so \nthat our artists, event organisers and audiences can all thrive. \nThank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member! \nMr Quirin: M. le président, l’honorable ministre peut-il dire à la Chambre quels sont \nles lieux qui ont été identifiés pour la tenue des concerts ? \nMr Gondeea: As I said, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry is not concerned with \nthese issues right now. Just after we established the Cultural Desk, then afterwards, I can tell \nyou what we are going to do. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes. \nMr Quirin: Si je comprends bien l’honorable ministre n’a aucune information à ce qui \nconcerne l’organisation des concerts mais je lui pose une question au cas où il serait au \ncourant, s’il y a eu des demandes qui ont été rejetées depuis l’arrivée du nouveau \ngouvernement ? S’il le sait, quelles en sont les raisons ? \nMr Gondeea: As I said, I don’t know because these applications do not come to my \nMinistry. \nThe Deputy Speaker: It is the Commissioner of Police who gives the instruction. You \nhave said that. Thank you. \nThe hon. Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle! \nFERNEY-DEUX FRÈRES COASTAL ROAD – REINSTATEMENT – \nEXPECTED START & COMPLETION DATES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/616",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 616,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/616) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the coastal road at the level \nof Ferney to Deux Frères, he will state if consideration will be given for the reinstatement \nthereof and, if so, indicate the expected start and completion dates thereof. \n\n73",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to refer the hon. Member to the \nreply I made to PQ B/223 on 25 March 2025 wherein I informed the House that the B28 \nRoad had been severely damaged further to the pipe laying works being carried out by the \nCentral Water Authority. \nI also informed the House that the CWA would implement the required works to \nreinstate the road. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am now informed by the CWA that the reinstatement works \nconcern some 13.1 km of road following the replacement of approximately 30-year-old \nDuctile iron pipes. The reinstatement is being carried out in two stages.  \nFirstly, temporary reinstatement undertaken by the contractor carrying out the \npipelaying works which consist of back-filling and applying a 30-millimetre layer of \nasphaltic concrete along the trenches. \nAnd secondly, the permanent reinstatement to be undertaken by a separate Grade A \ncontractor following a bidding exercise. This involves asphalting the damaged road to a \nthickness of 50 millimetre.  \nAs at date, temporary reinstatement works from Ferney to Anse-Jonchée, over \napproximately 6.7 km are ongoing and are expected to be completed by August 2025. As \nregards the road from Anse-Jonchée to Bambous Virieux and Petit Sable, temporary \nreinstatement works have already been completed in April 2025. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed by the CWA that a separate contract for \nthe permanent road reinstatement works is expected to be launched under the Open National \nBidding procedures by mid July 2025. The works are expected to start by October 2025 and \nwould be completed by February 2026. \nAdditionally, provisions have been made under the current financial year to carry out \nthe permanent road reinstatement works from Ferney to Petit Sable.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to highlight that the RDA has raised concerns over the \nCWA’s failure to comply with the conditions of wayleave namely, at L’Escalier, Chemin \nGrenier, St-Julien-d’Hotman and Hermitage, where no proper temporary reinstatement work \nwas carried out despite several notices sent.  \n\n74 \n \nAccording to the RDA, the practice of awarding separate contracts for pipelaying and \npermanent road reinstatement results in significant delays, adversely affecting road users due \nto insufficient temporary restoration.  \nTo address this, the RDA is proposing to take over permanent road reinstatement works \nonce pipelaying is completed and commissioned by the CWA. In this regard, the RDA will \nhold discussions with the CWA for the signature of a Memorandum of Understanding, \noutlining payment terms and responsibilities to be agreed upon between both authorities.   \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River! \nNLTA – PUBLIC SERVICE VEHICLE (CONTRACT CARS) LICENCE – \nREQUIREMENTS & CONDITIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025",
        "tuesday-07-october-2025",
        "tuesday-28-october-2025",
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/617",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 617,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/617) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Public Service Vehicle (Contract Cars) \nLicence, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport \nAuthority, information as to the – \n(a) \nrequirements and conditions for the issue thereof, and  \n(b) \nnames of the persons having been issued therewith over the past five years, \nindicating if they are still holders thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, \nI wish to inform the House that I had provided detailed information thereto in my reply to \nParliamentary Question B/574 put by the same hon. Member, Mr Babajee, during our Sitting \nof 24 June 2025. \nHowever, I am tabling the information on the requirements and conditions as provided \nby the National Land Transport Authority as follows.  \nComing to part (b), Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am apprised by the NLTA that a total of \n4317 contract car licenses has been granted during the last five years, as follows – \n• \n2020 – 518; \n• \n2021 – 296; \n• \n2022 – 412; \n• \n2023 – 75; \n\n75 \n \n• \n2024 – 2907, and \n• \n2025 – 09.  \nHowever, only 3650 such licences are valid as at date while 657 have still not been \nimplemented, as yet.  \nFinally, as regards part (c) of the question, I wish to inform the hon. Member that the \nlist of names of persons having been issued contract cars, PSVs, over the last five years, have \nbeen compiled. I invite him to come to the Ministry or the NLTA to have access to same. He \ncan eventually touch base with my office for necessary arrangements accordingly.  \nAs a last note, there has been several questions on the fleet of contractor cars on our \nroads. Let me, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, mention that as at now, there are 11,153 contract cars \non our roads, 7,781 having been issued from 2015-2024, representing 70% having been \ngranted over the last ten years.  \nThe NLTA is of the view that there could be more than what the market needs at the \nmoment.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member! \nMr Babajee: As you just said, there were 2,907 in 2024 and according to my \ninformation, these have been done to facilitate money laundering. And, those applicants who \napplied for it, they are not holding the permit right now. Those permits have been sold. And, \naccording to that information, one permit allows you to buy three cars.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay. Now, put your question! \nMr Babajee: The question is whether those people eligible to hold those permits, \naccording to those criteria. \nAnd, according to my information, there is one company – Pankaja Co. Ltd, in Mare \nD’Albert, and everyone knows – he was, at that time, the right hand of Mr Bobby Hurreeram. \nHe holds 14 of those permits. And, in the West, I won’t give those names, …. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Alright! Alright! Put your question! \nMr Babajee: Can we have those details if they are eligible to hold those permits? If \nthey are not applicants; they can buy those permits. Is it legal? \n\n76 \n \nMr Osman Mohamed: Well, the hon. Member, like I said, I will open the books to \nhim at the NLTA. If he finds anything fishy, we are duty-bound to refer those to the FCC, \nshould there be maldonne, as he stated.  \nMr Babajee: For the public interest, can we have those names tabled and will inquiry \nbe done accordingly? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Well, okay. Section 44 of the Data Protection Act of 2017, Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, stipulates – \n“No exception to this Act shall be allowed except where it constitutes a necessary and \nproportionate measure in a democratic society, inter alia, an […] objective of general \npublic interest.” \nSince the hon. Member has invoked public interest, I will table it.  \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Hon. First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart! \nRIVIERE DU REMPART – WOMEN EMPOWERMENT CENTRE – RE-OPENING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/618",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 618,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/618) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the Rivière du \nRempart Women Empowerment Centre, she will state – \n (a) the reasons for the closure thereof in 2020, and \n(b)  whether consideration will be given for the re-opening thereof and, if so, when \nand, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Ms Navarre-Marie: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I \nam informed that the Indira Gandhi Women Empowerment Centre at Rivière du Rempart was \nclosed in March 2021 for reasons known only to the previous government. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, in view of financial constraints, I wish to inform \nthe House that priority is being given to reopen and operate women empowerment centres in \ngovernment-owned buildings. \nWith regard to Rivière du Rempart, actions have already been initiated to find a \nsolution so that women of the region are not penalised. \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Yes, hon. Member! \n\n77 \n \nDr. Prayag: Can the hon. Minister inform the House whether discussions are being \nentertained with the Local Government Authority Ministry so as to take on the building at the \nNew Market at Rivière du Rempart for the same? \nThank you.  \nMs Navarre-Marie: Yes, Sir.  \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Thank you. \nHon. First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nREPUBLIC CUP 2024-25 – FOOTBALL MATCH – VENUE SELECTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/619",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 619,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/619) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the football final \nmatch of the Republic Cup 2024-25 held on 22 June 2025 between La Cure Waves and \nChebel Citizens, he will state why the Auguste Vollaire Stadium was selected therefor, \nindicating the policy of the Ministry for the selection of venues for football matches of such \nlevel and importance.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the scheduling of sports events comprising \nleagues or other specific competition rests solely with Sport Federations which are \nautonomous bodies. \nThis principle applies to all Sport Federations, operating within the Republic of \nMauritius, whether Olympic or non-Olympic disciplines, there are around 50 of them. There \nis no specific policy as such at the level of the Ministry.  \nIn respect of football competition specifically, I am informed that a fixture and venues \nfor the season which comprises the Super League, the Republic Cup and the MFA Cup are \ndrawn by the Mauritius Football Association prior to their start thereof. \nThereafter, the MFA makes appropriate bookings with the Mauritius Sports Council, \nand the latter puts its stadium at the disposal of the MFA subject to certain conditions. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that the National Managing Committee of the \nMFA, held on 16 June 2025, resolved that the final match of the Republic Cup 2025 \nopposition La Cure Waves SC to Chebel Citizens SC be played on 22 June 2025 at the \nAuguste Vollaire Stadium in Flacq.  \n\n78 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to draw the attention of the House that the organisation \nof the holding of sport events in the country is governed by the Sports Complex and Stadium \nRegulation 2003. It covers 40 federations, 13 stadiums and 27 sports complexes. \n I am tabling a copy of the regulations. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you have a supplementary? \nMs Savabaddy: I have two supplementary. Thank you.  \nMerci pour la réponse. L’honorable ministre peut-il confirmer que ce match était \ninitialement programmé pour être discuté au Côte d’Or National Sports Complex et nous dire \nqui a pris cette décision injuste de changer le stade pour la finale de la Republic Cup ? Merci. \nMr Nagalingum: I have answered to that question. It is the MFA who is fully \nresponsible of the events. \nMs Savabaddy: Second question! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Your next question!  \nMs Savabaddy: Yes, thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: No, I was talking about your next question. \nMs Savabaddy: My next supplementary? \nThe Deputy Speaker: B/620! \nMs Savabaddy: I have another supplementary.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: But he has said c’est la fédération des sports qui organise le \nfootball. \nMs Savabaddy: No, I have two supplementary! \nThe Deputy Speaker: I will give you one supplementary, not two. Only one. Because \nthe hon. Minister has said he has no control on who organises the stadium. It is la fédération. \nNow, if you want, one last question! \nMs Savabaddy: Il y a eu une discrimination à ce sujet, M. le président. \nThe Deputy Speaker: One last question, please! \nMs Savabaddy: For hon. Nagalingum? \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes! \n\n79 \n \nMs Savabaddy: Okay, thank you.  \nPourquoi a-t-on brutalement empêché les joueurs de Cité La Cure et de Chebel de \nfouler le stade Côte d’Or en les qualifiant de ‘fouteurs de désordre’ ? Cette décision va \ntotalement à l’encontre de tout ce qu’on avait promis durant notre campagne, je cite « Ki zot \nproblem ek Cité La Cure ? »  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question! \nMs Savabaddy: I am putting my question right now. \nAlors, par rapport à cette décision, le ministre peut-il informer à la Chambre s’il y a eu \nou non, ou est-ce qu’il y aura une enquête pour situer les responsabilités de cette décision ? \nEst-ce que le responsable sera appelé à présenter ses excuses à ses équipes ? Merci. \nMr Nagalingum: I am not aware of what the hon. Member is saying. But I am \nrepeating myself, it is the MFA who organises and schedules for matches to be played on any \nstadium. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question!  \nHon. First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nUNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY – MALAGASY STUDENTS – ENROLMENT \nISSUES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/620",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 620,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research",
      "question": "(No. B/620) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research whether, in regard \nto the University of Technology (UTM), he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ntherefrom, information as to whether there are enrolment procedural issues of Malagasy \nstudents thereat and, if so, give details thereof, indicating, in the case of Miss R. F. F., when – \n(a) \nher application was submitted to the UTM; \n(b) \nthe UTM submitted her visa application to the Passport and Immigration Office, \nand  \n(c) \nthe Student Visa was issued.",
      "answer": "Dr. Sukon: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the University of Technology \nMauritius that no application for admission has been received in the name of Ms R.F.F., \nMalagasy national. \n\n80 \n \nHowever, the UTM has informed that one Malagasy student, Ms R.N.F., enrolled in \nMA Communication and Public Relations for the April 2025 intake, had travelled to \nMauritius on a tourist visa which expired on 25 June 2025.  \nSubsequently, the UTM intervened with the Passport and Immigration Office. On 26 \nJune, the PIO has granted a residence permit to the student. The student is now continuing her \nstudies at UTM. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes! \nMs Savabaddy: Thank you. The hon. Minister will surely agree that this is a heart-\nbreaking case which is in contradiction with the policy of education hub.  \nWill he use his good office to ensure that Malagasy nationals do not have to endure \nsuch hardship, especially when they come to study in public tertiary institutions such as \nUTM? Thank you. \nDr. Sukon: Thank you. In fact, we are having a committee looking at the entire process \nfor all students from all countries. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 5 – WATER SUPPLY COMPLAINTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/621",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 621,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/621) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to water supply, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to the number \nof complaints filed by residents of Constituency No. 5 in relation thereto, indicating the \nnumber of unattended cases thereof and in each case, the – \n(a) \ndate of filing of complaint, and \n(b) \nnature thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: M. le président, la CWA m’informe qu’un total de 3,293 plaintes \nrelatives à l’approvisionnement en eau ont été enregistrées pour la circonscription no. 5 entre \nle 1 janvier 2025 au 26 juin 2025.  \nOn estime qu’environ 15 % de ces plaintes sont les mêmes appels qu’on reçoit. Ce qui \nreprésente environ 2,800 cas valides. Ces plaintes concernent des tuyaux cassés, des fuites et \ndes interruptions d’approvisionnement en eau. \n\n81 \n \nParmi celles-ci, je suis informé que la CWA a déjà traité 1,728 plaintes, soit 62 %. M. le \nprésident, les plaintes récurrentes de la circonscription no. 5 sont principalement attribuées à \nl’état vieillissant de son réseau de tuyaux composé de tuyaux en amiante, ciment et fonte \ngalvanisée. Dans cette circonscription, environ 30 km de tuyaux défectueux ont été identifiés \nnécessitant un remplacement urgent, notamment dans les zones clés comme Baie du \nTombeau, Pointe aux Piments, Balaclava, Trou aux Biches et Arsenal, entre autres. \nDans le cas de la ligne de crédit indienne, la CWA prévoit de renouveler 4 km de \ntuyaux prochainement à Trou aux Biches. Entre-temps, la CWA a renforcé ses effectifs et ses \n \nressources au sein de ses équipes d’intervention pour assurer les réparations. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you have a question? \nMr Rookny: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, could the hon. Minister advise if upon resolution \nof these issues, the water supply of Solitude, notably at 7ème Mille, will be resolved? \nMr Assirvaden: Oui, je l’espère.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes! \nBELLE ROSE AVENUE, QUATRE BORNES –TWO-WAY TRAFFIC \nCONSIDERATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/622",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 622,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/622) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Belle Rose Avenue, in Quatre \nBornes, he will state if consideration will be given for same to be reverted to a two-way \ntraffic outside school hours in respect of the Baichoo Madhoo Government School located \nthereat and during week-ends and school holidays.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Traffic \nManagement and Road Safety Unit of my Ministry that the Belle Rose Avenue consists of the \nfollowing road segments – \n(i) \nTwo-way road from its junction with Victoria Avenue up to its Junction to \nd’Epinay Avenue; \n(ii) \nOne way road from its junction with d’Epinay Avenue up to its junction with \nDraper Avenue with traffic flowing in the direction of Port Louis-St Jean along \nA1 Road, and \n\n82 \n \n(iii) \nTwo-way road from its junction with Draper Avenue to its junction with A1 \nRoad. \nNow, the whole stretch of Belle Rose Avenue up to its junctions with the A1 Road, that \nis, the one-way stretch is built up on both sides with high pedestrian activity, irrespective of \ntiming within or beyond peak school hours and holidays. Also, there are many educational \ninstitutions along the one-way segment of Belle Rose Avenue, namely – \n• Gaetan Raynal State College; \n• Baichoo Madhoo Government School, and \n• Royal Rock School. \nTwo speed traffic calming devices have been installed along Belle Rose Avenue in front \nof Gaetan Raynal State College. All road markings and traffic signs associated with the traffic \ncalming devices have been designed taking into consideration the one-way traffic flow. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed by the TMRSU that the width of the \none-way segment of Belle Rose Avenue varies from 4.5 metres to 5.3 metres, with the \npresence of footpath on one side of the road. Due to the narrowness of Belle Rose Avenue \nalong this stretch, it is not adequate to cater for a two-way traffic and warrants that it remains \na one-way traffic, because you need at least 5 metres for a two-way traffic to flow. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, additionally, it is worth mentioning that it is not recommended \nto convert Belle Rose Avenue from its junction to d’Epinay Avenue up to its junction with \nDraper Avenue, because it is not practical to adjust the road markings and traffic signs \nassociated with the traffic calming measures on a daily basis to cater for a temporary two-way \ntraffic movement. \nThe one-way segment of Belle Rose Avenue may, however, be permanently converted \ninto a two-way traffic provided land is acquired by the highway authority, namely the \nMunicipal Council of Quatres Bornes in this case, for subsequent widening of the road where \nnecessary.  \nThe sworn land surveyor of the TMRSU has already surveyed Belle Rose Avenue, \nhighlighting all existing features that will entail, I am told, demolishing existing block walls \nof people living there. In the meantime, the Municipal City Council has installed pavements, \netc. \n\n83 \n \nThis survey plan will help for the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes to determine the \nextent of land required to widen the Belle Rose Avenue to cater for a safe and efficient two-\nway traffic movement on a permanent basis. \nThe Deputy Speaker: You have a question, yes. \nMs Anquetil : Je vous remercie, M. le président. M. le président, je suis en possession \nd’une pétition signée par les habitants de la région de Belle Rose, qui demandent que cette \nportion de route sur l’Avenue Belle Rose à côté de l’école de Baichoo Madhoo soit \nréaménagée en double sens uniquement les week-ends et pendant les vacances scolaires. Le \nministre peut-il indiquer à la Chambre, si son ministère serait disposé à envisager à titre \nexpérimental, sachant qu’au préalable cette route était déjà en double sens dans le passé, un \ntel aménagement afin d’en évaluer les effets sur la fluidité du trafic ? Je vous remercie. \nMr Osman Mahomed: The hon. Member is right. About 10 years ago, it was a two-\nway traffic, and then, people of the locality had requested that it be converted in one way \narrangement. But then, on a pilot basis, for certain specific time/days – weekends, public \nholidays and school holidays – I think we can envisage conducting a site visit and explore the \npossibilities. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question! Hon. Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre \nBornes! \nHILLCREST AVENUE TO PORT LOUIS – PERSISTENT TRAFFIC CONGESTION \n– REMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/623",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 623,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/623) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the persistent traffic congestion \noccurring during peak hours from Hillcrest Avenue and surrounding residential areas towards \nthe motorway leading to Port Louis, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nRoad Development Authority, information as to the remedial measures being envisaged in \nrelation thereto.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed:  Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Road \nDevelopment Authority – the question is whether I can check with the Road Development \nAuthority. The Road Development Authority is under the aegis of my colleague, the Minister \nof National Infrastructure; in its capacity is as the highway authority, the latter has the \nfollowing two projects in the pipeline which would contribute towards reducing traffic \ncongestion and travel time along the motorway M1, Hillcrest Avenue and St Jean Road, as \n\n84 \n \nwell as enhance accessibility by providing an alternative route from Quatre Bornes to Ebène \nand vice versa – \n1. \nConstruction of a link road between Motorway M1 at Hillcrest and Motorway M3 \nat Trianon. The project consists of the construction of the dual carriageway from \nthe Hillcrest interchange to a new interchange onto motorway M3 at Trianon; \n2. \nConstruction of the Pellegrin-Trianon link road. The link road comprises of the \nconstruction of a single carriageway of approximately 150 metres long from \nmotorway M3 to Petit Camp Branch Road. It will eventually connect the newly \nconstructed dumbbell junction on motorway M3 to development in Trianon for \nimproved connectivity. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed by the TRMSU of my Ministry that \ndespite the construction of a great separated junction in August 2021 by the previous regime \nat the cost of Rs276 million plus, excluding VAT. Hillcrest Road in Sodnac continues to \nsuffer from severe traffic congestion particularly during morning peak hours. This is not just \nan inconvenience; it is a significant impediment to daily commuters and overall traffic flow \nin the region. \nThe TRMSU has identified two main impediments – \n1. \nThe signalised intersection at Tulips Avenue interrupting flow on Hillcrest which \nwere installed by the Road Development Authority during the upgrading works at \nHillcrest Road; \n2. \nA dangerously inadequate motorway acceleration lane, very short in fact that \nforces police to manually meter traffic causing severe queues to spill back into \nHillcrest. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in fact, I have made a visit there before, on request of my \nhonourable colleagues and yourself. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, even with the great separation \ntraffic on Hillcrest Road is not free-flowing. In fact, the traffic lights at the junction with \nTulips Avenue are primary cause of this interruption. Every time the lights turn red, traffic \nstops and queues quickly build up. Therefore, during peak time the intersection simply cannot \nhandle the volume leading to frustrating delays and congestion that stretch far beyond the \ntraffic lights themselves. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the most arguably critical issue is the acceleration lane that \nwas constructed in 2021 by the previous regime for joining the motorway is simply too short. \nAround 75 metres and it is, therefore, very unsafe. \n\n85 \n \nThe recommended acceleration lane on motorway should be at least 150 metres long \nfor vehicles to gather cruising speed. Drivers cannot safely merge into fast moving motorway \ntraffic without sufficient space to accelerate. This dangerous design flaw forces our police \nofficers to step in during peak hours acting as manual meter as I said just now. They have to \nhold back vehicles, releasing them in small batches to prevent accidents. While this ensures \nsafety, it severely limits how many cars can get into the motorway. Long queues are formed \non the rent, extending all the way back onto Hillcrest Road. This spill-back directly chokes \nHillcrest Road making the congestion even worse especially around the Tulip Avenue \nintersection. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, according to TRMSU, consideration should be given for \nlinking the Hillcrest roundabout with motorway M3 through an internal road network of Petit \nCamp, Pellegrin and also linking Marbella Road with Hillcrest roundabout. \nLastly, this will provide an additional alternative route for traffic along Hillcrest Road \nto proceed in the region of Trianon to join motorway M3 to ultimately proceeds toward the \nCyber City and Port Louis or the North of island. Motorway linking Marbella Road with \nHillcrest roundabout will also contribute to decrease the traffic loading at St Jean interchange \nas traffic generated by three malls will have an alternative route toward Quatre Bornes, and \nultimately, motorway M1 through Hillcrest roundabout. The Road Development Authority \nshould include this project in the road decongestion problem. \nMs Anquetil: Just one question. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Just one question, I hope. \nMs Anquetil : Je vous remercie, M. le président. M. le président, le Dr. Arvin Boolell, \nvous et moi, nous savons qu’aux heures de pointe, un embouteillage monstre se forme chaque \njour sur l’axe ralliant Hillcrest à l’autoroute. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, ask the Minister for the remedial measures. \nMs Anquetil: En attendant les travaux, le ministre peut-il indiquer à la Chambre si son \nministère envisage de mettre en place un système de déviation afin de désengorger Hillcrest \net ses environs ? Je vous remercie, M. le président. \nMr Osman Mahomed: During the site visit that I effected, I mentioned earlier, about \ntwo months ago actually, I was told that bringing traffic to St Jean Road will make it even \n\n86 \n \nworse because St Jean Road is already choked and, as you know, the Metro line is exactly in \nthe middle. \nSo, the real solution lies at the doorstep of my colleague, the hon. Ajay Gunness, \nbecause if you link road linking that road to M1 is constructed, this will be the solution but \nlike I said, we have tried all the possible avenue but we will do it again on request of the hon. \nMember. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The Hon. Second member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre D'or! \nNATIONAL PENSION FUND – DISMANTLING & REPLACEMENT – IMPACTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/624",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 624,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/624) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity whether, in regard \nto the dismantling and replacement of the National Pension Fund (NPF) by the outgoing \nGovernment, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe balance of the then NPF at time of dissolution; \n(b) \nwhether the assets thereof were transferred to a successor entity, redistributed or \nrepurposed, and \n(c) \nwhether same impacted the beneficiaries thereof and long-term pension \nsustainability.",
      "answer": "Mr Subron: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that the National \nPension Fund was established under section 37 of the National Pensions Act 1976 and is \nadministered by Ministry of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity. \nContribution to the Fund were made by both employers and employees in the private \nsector at the rate of 6% and 3%, respectively. These contributions were capped based on a \nceiling applied to the basic salary which stood at Rs18,740 in August 2020 when the then \ngovernment decided to change the system. \nWith regard to what is stated in the introductory part of the question, I wish to clarify \nthat the Fund is still in existence and operational. It was the contribution of employers and \nemployees that were discontinued by the June 2020 Budget of the previous government. \nIn fact, it was the operation of the National Pension Scheme that was effectively \ndismantled as from 01 September 2020. The National Pensions Fund, although not formally \ndismantled, was placed in a path of gradual extinction. \nI also wish to inform the hon. Member that the National Pensions Act was amended \nthrough the Finance (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2020, abolishing the payment of \n\n87 \n \ncontributions to the NPF and introducing the Contribution Sociale Généralisée (CSG) as \nfrom 01 September 2020. With the introduction of the CSG, contributions are now collected \nby the Mauritius Revenue Authority (MRA). \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, regarding part (a) of the question, I am informed that when \ncontributions were stopped in 2020, the funds value stood at approximately Rs139 billion. \nSince then, the funds have been dispersing about Rs4.5 billion annually in the form of \ncontributory retirement pensions, contributory widows’ pensions, contributory invalidity \npensions, contributory orphans’ pensions and industrial injury benefits. Over the past four and \na half years, a total of around Rs23 billion have been disbursed. \nRegarding part (b) of the question, the answer is no. The assets of the fund remain \nunder the name of the National Pensions Fund which continues to exist.  \nRegarding part (c) of the question, as the assets remain under the control of the \nNational Pensions Fund, actual and future beneficiaries will continue to receive their \npensions in accordance with the provisions of the National Pensions Act. \nThank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you have a supplementary question? \nMr Beejan: Yes. Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Can the hon. Minister provide or \neven table further information and facts on the decision of the former Government to stop \nNPF contributions in 2020? Thank you. \nMr Subron: In the name of time, I can either table the response or I can answer it. It is \nup to the Deputy Speaker, Sir, to decide. \nThe Deputy Speaker: If it is long, you better table it. \nMr Subron: Okay, thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. I will table the rest of the \nanswer. \nThe Deputy Speaker: We have got five minutes to go. Hon. First Member for Piton \nand Rivière du Rempart! \n \nFORBACH-POUDRE D'OR HAMLET – SPEED DETERRENTS – YELLOW BOX & \nTRAFFIC LIGHTS – TRAFFIC CENTRE UPGRADE \n\n88",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/625",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 625,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/625) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Forbach Road, extending from \nForbach to Poudre d'Or Hamlet, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \n– \n(a) \nthe speed deterrents and other measures being envisaged along Cottage, \nEsperance Trebuchet and Poudre d’Or Hamlet, and  \n(b) \nwhere matters stand as to the – \n(i) \nproposed implementation of a yellow box and traffic lights at the Esperance \nTrebuchet Junction, in the vicinity of the filling station, and  \n(ii) \nproposed upgrading of the Poudre d'Or Hamlet Traffic Centre.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that the road segment \nunder consideration covers an approximate length of 5.4 km, starting at the Forbach \nroundabout on motorway M2, passing through Cottage and Forbach Road B181 and \nextending till the junction of Forbach Road B42 with Poudre d’Or B16 Road. The posted \nspeed along these roads is 60 km/h. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, along the 5.4 km stretch \nof road, the following road safety features already exist – \n(i) \nTraffic lights at the junctions of Forbach Road B42 at Beau Plateau Road B43 \nand at the entrance of Cottage; \n(ii) \nTwo raised speed tables near community health centre and Quincaillerie St Benoit \nat Cottage; \n(iii) A speed camera near Big Splash Sports Club in the region of l’Esperance \nTrebuchet along Forbach Road B42. \nMoreover, the following additional measures will be implemented in the forthcoming \nFramework Agreement Contract 2025-2027 to further improve road safety along these \nstretches of the road – \n• \nInstallation of raised pavement markers known also as cats’ eyes; \n• \nConstruction of raised speed table in the vicinity of pre-primary school at \nForbach; \n• \nProvision of pedestrian crossing near Meena Bazaar at Cottage; \n• \nCreation of a 14 km speed zone along the built-up area at Cottage Village; \n\n89 \n \n• \nConstruction of a raised speed table at Restaurant Le Manguier at Cottage along \nB42 road; \n• \nConstruction of a raised pedestrian crossing in l’Esperance Trebuchet near an \nexisting bus layby along B42 road; \n• \nConstruction of two raised speed tables in the vicinity of the village hall and LAD \nHardware shop at Poudre d’Or Hamlet; \n• \nProvision of traffic lights at the junction of Forbach B42 road with Poudre d’Or \nB16 road near the temple at Poudre d’Or Hamlet. \nWith regard to part (b)(i) of the question, the yellow box at the junction of the petrol \nfilling station at l’Esperance Trebuchet has already been implemented by the TMRSU. \nFurthermore, the TMRSU will investigate whether the l’Esperance Trebuchet junction can be \ncontrolled with traffic lights while maintaining safe in and out movements at the petrol filling \nstation which is located at the corner of Forbach Road B42 and Royal Navketan Road. \nRegarding part (b) of the question lastly, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have checked with \nthe Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit and was told that it has not been made aware \nof the Poudre d’Or Hamlet Traffic Centre. However, site visits were held in the past for a \nproposed traffic centre at the junction of Forbach B42 Road and Poudre d’Or B16 Road near \nthe temple. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, the Table has been advised that the following PQs have \nbeen withdrawn: B/627, B/628, B/629, B/630, B/631, B/633, B/634, B/636, and B/640. \nTime is over! \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I beg to move that all the \nbusiness on today’s Order Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of \nStanding Order 10. \nMr Mohamed rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \n\n90 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, statement. Hon. Minister of Social Integration, Social \nSecurity and National Solidarity! \nSTATEMENT BY MINISTER \n(4.05 p.m.) \nINVALIDITY PENSION SYSTEM – PROPOSED REVIEW  \nThe Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity (Mr A. Subron): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with your permission, I wish to make a statement on the \nproposed review of the Invalidity Pension system, following the one made by the hon. Prime \nMinister at the last Sitting of the National Assembly on Income Support, Invalidity Pension \nreform and the setting up of a Committee of Experts on the pension system and the \nrevamping of the National Pensions Fund (NPF). \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in its Government Programme 2025-2029 ‘A Bridge to the \nFuture’, this Government committed to implementing fundamental structural reforms aimed \nat creating a more inclusive society for persons living with disabilities, one of the most \nvulnerable segments of our population. It is imperative that our public policies reflect our \ncommitment to providing them with the support they rightfully deserve. As for the proposed \nconstitutional amendment on the inclusion of disability as a criterion for non-discrimination, \nsame will be considered by the forthcoming Constitutional Review Committee. \nIn regard to the Invalid’s Basic Pension (BIP), it is important to note that it is currently \naccessible to individuals below the age of 50, provided they are certified to have a disability \nof 60% or above. With the present ongoing reform of the Basic Retirement Pension (BRP), \nthe eligibility age for the Invalid’s Basic Pension will be extended from 60 to 65. It is \nestimated that approximately 1,500 additional persons will benefit from the Invalid’s Basic \nPension for each year between the ages of 60 and 65. In parallel and in addition to this \nmeasure, Government is undertaking a comprehensive review of the entire invalidity pension \ndetermination system in Mauritius. The current system is outdated and in need of reform to \nprovide a more human and inclusive approach. \nI attended the Global Disability Summit held in Berlin on 2 and 3 April 2025 with the \nmain objective of gaining insights of international best practices and the evolving global \napproach to disability-related public policies. One of the main takeaways from the Summit is \nthat the Republic of Mauritius is lagging behind in the way disability assessments are \nconducted.  \n\n91 \n \nPresently, disability assessment in Mauritius is based solely on a person’s medical \ncondition, and typically, on a single condition. This approach disadvantages individuals \nsuffering from multiple medical conditions as it excludes the consideration of social and \nfunctional factors. \nWe are, therefore, proposing to transition to a hybrid model wherein a person’s ability \nto function in daily life, for example, his capacity to travel, feed himself/herself or solve \nproblems independently would be evaluated. Additionally, instead of limiting assessments to \na person’s single medical condition, multiple ones will be considered. \nWe are also proposing to move away from the current “all-or-nothing” model of \nfinancial support. Presently, only individuals assessed with a disability of 60% or more \nqualify for the full Invalid’s Basic Pension of Rs15,000 per month. Those assessed below the \n60% threshold often receive no support or a limited, meagre Disability Allowance of \nRs2,500. Therefore, we are proposing to introduce a graduated support model whereby \nindividuals with a disability of less than 60% will receive some form of financial assistance. \nFurthermore, my Ministry will also be working towards the implementation of specific \nassessment models for children with disabilities, recognising that their needs differ from \nthose of adults. We are actually proposing to take rare diseases as a functional factor for \nassessment. \nAnother proposed major reform will be a revamp of the assessment panels. At present, \nthe responsibility to assess and determine eligibility for the pension lies with the medical \nboard, usually composed of two general practitioners. We are proposing to introduce a multi-\ndisciplinary panel that will include medical specialists, psychologists, occupational therapists, \ntrauma therapists, and others. We are also considering the inclusion of representatives of \npersons with disabilities in the panels to ensure that the perspective persons with disabilities \nare present.  \nAfter all, the global guiding principle for the rights of persons with disabilities is: \n“Nothing about us, without us.” The assessment panel will also be multi-dimensional and will \nenable assessment of different types of disabilities related benefits at one go. \n\n92 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I believe that in the context of the present reform of the whole \npension system, it was essential to communicate to the population the vision of my Ministry \nand of the Government on the proposed Invalid’s Basic Pension reform. \nIn the context of the above, my Ministry is preparing a Cabinet Memorandum to be \nsubmitted shortly to the Cabinet of Ministers, which, of course, will take into consideration \nthe present budgetary constraint. \nThank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes! \nPUBLIC BILL \nSecond Reading \nTHE LEGAL AID AND LEGAL ASSISTANCE BILL \n(NO. XIII OF 2025) \nOrder for Second Reading read. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Attorney General! \n(4.12 p.m.) \nThe Attorney General (Mr G.P.C. Glover, SC): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I move that \nthe Legal Aid and Legal Assistance Bill (No. XIII of 2025) be read a second time.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, amongst the reforms I have introduced in this House so far, \nthis Bill holds for me a special place. As a law practitioner of four decades now, I have seen \nthe workings of our judicial system up close, and especially, the effects it can have on the \nlives of our citizens – the confusion and loneliness which one can feel when confronted by \nrules and procedures one does not understand. \nThe helplessness of knowing that one may have a legal right – but that to defend it \nwould be beyond one’s means is more often than not, unbearable. Justice in this country has, \nover the decades, earned its reputation of quality and integrity. But it also carries with it, \n\n93 \n \nincreasingly, unfortunately, the perception that it is a system that only works well for you if \nyou can wait for it and if you can pay for it. This cannot go on. \nThis morning itself, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in the L’Express newspaper, we have read \nabout the plight of single parents who struggle to overcome financial, legal and \nadministrative obstacles.  \nAs the article right puts it, I quote – \n« (…) la seule solution reste le tribunal – avec des délais longs, des coûts élevés et un \népuisement émotionnel garanti. » \nMy colleague, the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare, is tackling this \nparticular issue, as explained in the article. Thus, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the challenge of \nmaking access to justice easier and more affordable remains as crucial as ever. \nThe Bill before the House today tackles a question that is fundamental: whether our \njustice system still serves the many, or increasingly only the few. It invites us to consider \nwhat it truly means to say that we are all equal before the law. \nThe legislation which we propose to replace dates back to 1973. That was a different \ntime, a different society. In the fifty years since, our courts have modernised, our population \nhas grown, our economy has evolved. But the legal aid framework has barely moved. What \nwe bring before the House today, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, is not a mere amendment, but a \ncomprehensive reform. It seeks to restore legal aid to its rightful place as a living, relevant \ninstrument of fairness and the rule of law. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the purpose of the Bill is simple and vital. It is to ensure that \nthose who cannot afford legal representation are not left without recourse. Whether before the \ncourts or at the police station, whether in civil disputes or criminal proceedings, the State \nshould step in to ensure that legal representation is available for people who are in financial \nneed. \nTo that end, this Bill – \n(i) \nRaises the eligibility thresholds of legal aid for both income and assets, reflecting \npresent-day economic realities; \n\n94 \n \n(ii) Broadens the scope of offences for which legal aid and assistance may be \ngranted; \n(iii) Imposes obligations on both the courts and police officers to inform individuals \nof their rights to apply for legal aid and legal assistance, respectively, and \n(iv) Simplifies the process through a unified application of the system. \nIt also provides, for the first time, a comprehensive definition of assets, and strengthens \nthe guarantees of fair legal representation at both trial and pre-trial stages. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let us begin with the basic figures. Under the current law, an \nadult earning more than Rs15,000 a month is generally excluded from legal aid. For legal \nassistance during a police enquiry, the limit is even lower, it is Rs 10,000. These figures have \nnot been revised since 2018. Yet, in the same period, the minimum wage has gone from \nRs9,000 to Rs17,110, and the prices of basic commodities have soared by 30 to 100 percent, \nas detailed in the Prime Minister’s Report on the State of the Economy earlier during our \nmandate. \nThe result is obvious. Someone earning minimum wage today is too poor to pay a \nlawyer, but considered too “rich” to qualify for legal aid. That is not a small flaw. It is a \nbreakdown of the system’s whole purpose. \nThis Bill sets a new income threshold: Rs25,000 of average monthly household income, \nbut calculated on a net basis. I will explain this. Yes, we are including in the calculation the \nincome of one’s spouse if one is married. But crucially, this sum will be the net income that \nsomeone can actually use and spend, that is, what is left after deducting from his earnings his \naverage household expenses and the repayment of his debts. \nFor instance, a couple may be earning salaries of Rs30,000 each, gender equality, \namounting to a total of Rs60,000 for both of them. But they may have expenses such as the \nhousing loan of say Rs20,000, utilities bills of Rs5,000, regular groceries bills of Rs15,000 a \nmonth, and spend Rs5,000 on their children’s school van. In total, their average monthly \nincome for the purpose of this law would not be Rs60,000 but Rs60,000 minus the Rs45,000 \nwhich I have just detailed, that is Rs15,000. They would therefore fall under the threshold of \nthis Bill and qualify for legal aid. \n\n95 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as everyone will understand, this reform will bring about a \nsubstantial expansion in the number of people eligible for aid. It is nothing less than a \nreinforcement of the Welfare State. \nIn this Government’s opinion, it is obviously an acceptable price to pay for justice to be \nfair. Of course, this exercise of scrutinising the finances will be monitored by the Courts to \nprevent any false or exaggerated declarations of expenses. But we will prefer here to err on \nthe side of generosity, which is why there is no list of what type of expenses are allowed. The \nreason, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, is that experiences taught my colleagues and me at the Bar \nthat almost no one who can easily afford to pay for their own lawyer, will instead choose a \ncourt-appointed one instead, not when their legal rights or their freedom is at stake.  \nThis is why we are confident that this new law will not open the floodgates to \nunmeritorious applications. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the spouse’s income will however not be counted in divorce or \nseparation matters, which is only just and reasonable.  \nThe maximum value of assets to be eligible would also increase from Rs500,000 to Rs1 \nmillion, excluding as the law will have it, clothing, work tools, and the subject matter of the \ncase. This again reflects the rising cost of living. \nThe Bill also provides for a broader definition of “assets”, to include not just cash and \nbank deposits, but also investments with non-bank institutions, shares, bonds, stakes in \ncompanies etc… whether in Mauritius or abroad. \nDespite these stated thresholds, the Court is given a margin of discretion in cases where \na person of low income may still own assets worth than Rs1 million because there can be \ntimes when, for instance, it would be unfair to ask someone of low means to sell an inherited \nplot of land just to defend a case against him, especially if that land is still “en in division”. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, these are practical, sensible reforms. But they are also moral \nchoices. We bring them not because they are popular. They do not provoke public interest, \ndebate or outcry. The example is here for all to see, the Opposition have not even deemed it \nfit to intervene on this very important piece of legislation.  \nMr Mohamed: Shame! \n\n96 \n \nMr Glover: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, there is no electoral dividend in expanding legal \naid. Which is probably why the previous Government, so keen on printing money to increase \nallowances it could not afford, did nothing to change the legal aid thresholds.  \nNo, we, on this side of this House, do not do this because it is popular, but because it is \nthe right thing to do. \nThe Bill further widens the scope of offences for which legal aid may be obtained. \nCurrently, the offences for which a person may obtain legal aid are restricted, and some \noffences still listed in the current law, no longer even exist. A person will now obtain legal aid \nfor any offence before any Court, save and except for those District Court offences that are \nnot punishable by penal servitude. In other words, only the most minor criminal offenses are \nexcluded from this scheme. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, access to justice begins not in court, but at the police station. \nThat is where this Bill goes further than any of its predecessors. \nLegal Assistance, as opposed to legal aid, which is the right to be advised and \nrepresented during police enquiry or bail hearings, has until now been available only for a \nnarrow list of serious offences. The new Bill removes that restriction. Legal assistance will \nnow be available for any offence that may lead to an arrest. \nMoreover, police officers will be under a legal duty to inform any person under arrest, \nin a language they understand, of their right to legal assistance, particularly before any \nstatement is taken under warning. This aligns our legal framework with the best traditions of \ndue process and protects both the rights of the accused and the integrity of our criminal \njustice system. \nThese changes will also benefit the legal profession and the administration of justice \nmore broadly. \nBy widening the base of legal aid recipients, the Bill ensures a more diverse flow of \ncases for Court-appointed counsel. This is particularly valuable for the younger members of \nthe Bar.  \nAs many hon. Members will know, there is a growing number of junior barristers who \nstruggle to gain meaningful court experience. Legal aid cases – be they in family, civil or \ncriminal matters – offer real exposure and real responsibility. \n\n97 \n \nBarristers and attorneys assigned under the scheme are required to accept such briefs, \nunless disqualified by conflict of interest or manifest lack of competence and expertise. They \nmay not claim or receive any sum from the recipient of legal aid but they are paid a modest \nfee by the Court. For instance, an attorney and a barrister receive Rs10,000 each for a case \nentered by way of plaint with summons before the Supreme Court, Rs8,000 for Intermediate \nCourt and Industrial Court cases and Rs5,000 for a District Court matter. A barrister \nappointed for a bail hearing or for assistance at the Police Station is paid Rs5,000 and only \nRs15,000 for representing a client at the Assizes.  \nThe relationship is governed by professional duty, not market transaction. This is why \nthe practice of law is not a business. And that is why we are not traders and this Bill ensures \nthat it remains so. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, allow me to walk the hon. Members today, briefly through the \nstructure of the Bill – \n• Part I – Preliminary (Clauses 1 to 3) \nThat part sets out the short title, definitions, and scope of application. It clarifies, for \nexample, that the Act does not apply to disciplinary proceedings, and limits its application in \ncertain minor criminal cases. \n• Part II – Legal Aid in Civil and Criminal Proceedings (Clauses 4 to 9) \nThat part establishes the right to legal aid and sets out the eligibility criteria: a monthly \nhousehold income below Rs25,000 and assets below Rs1 million. It outlines the application \nprocedure, permits legal aid in criminal appeals, and grants special protection to juveniles, \nensuring they, the juveniles, are automatically eligible regardless of their means. \n• Part III – Legal Assistance during Police Enquiry and Bail Applications (Clauses \n10 to 14) \nThis section enshrines the right to legal assistance upon arrest and for bail applications. \nIt sets out the application process before the District Court and guarantees protection for \njuveniles, including where no parent or guardian is available to act on their behalf. \n• Part IV – Assignment of Counsel and Fees (Clauses 15 and 16) \n\n98 \n \nHere, the Court is empowered to assign a barrister or attorney. Lawyers must not \nrequest or receive any remuneration from clients under legal aid. The costs awarded in such \ncases accrue to the State, and any abuse of the scheme may lead to penalties. \n• Part V – Miscellaneous Provisions (Clauses 17 to 22) \nThis final part, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir provides for exemptions from court-related \nfees, empowers the Chief Justice to make rules for the purposes of this Act and for my Office \nto amend the Schedule by regulations, and includes, of course, transitional arrangements. The \nAct will come into force by Proclamation, with the possibility of staggered implementation. \n• The Schedule sets out a standardised form of affidavit to be used for applications \nunder both Legal Aid and Legal Assistance, streamlining the process and improving \ntransparency. \nThis Bill, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, will therefore improve the lives of many who find \nthemselves at their most vulnerable, before a magistrate, or a police officer, or in the quiet \nloneliness of legal proceedings they cannot afford. \nThe measure of a legal system is not only how it treats the powerful; it is also how it \ntreats the powerless. This Bill is a meaningful step in the right direction. Justice should be for \neveryone, regardless of their means.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this government has a mandate to better the life of the nation \nas a whole and part of this is precisely rendering access to justice easier. \nI therefore commend it to the House. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Narsinghen, you have the floor for 15 minutes! \n(4.29 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International \nTrade (Mr H. Narsinghen): M. le président, merci de me donner la parole.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I find on the list of orators – eight orators. This is a very \nimportant Bill and I think the Attorney General has rightly pointed out that this is not only a \ncosmetic amendment, not a cosmetic change; it is a fundamental change for the poor people \nand we, on this side of government, are in favour of the poor people and it is for the \npopulation to take note of this absence. \n\n99 \n \nAs we are speaking about access to justice, I am sandwiched whether to intervene in \nEnglish or French. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would have asked you the permission to speak \nin Creole but unfortunately, I know that you will not accede to my request.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: I can’t grant it for the time being.  \nMr Narsinghen: Then, I would prefer to intervene in the language of Molière because \nfirst and foremost, we are addressing the poor people. Donc, permettez-moi, M. le président, \nde commencer par une question essentielle à toute démocratie, et Maurice est une démocratie. \nComment ce projet de loi actuel sur l’aide juridique et l’assistance garantit-t ’il véritablement \nle droit d’accès à la justice pour tous ? \nD’abord, je suis dans une démarche, je dirais, beaucoup plus pédagogique que \ntechnique comme l’Attorney General. J’essaie d’expliquer c’est quoi un état de droit et ce \nprincipe d’accès à la justice.       \nDans un état de droit, M. le président, la justice ne peut être un privilège réservé à ceux \nqui en ont les moyens. Elle est, d’abord, un droit fondamental, accessible à chaque citoyen, \nen particulier, aux plus vulnérables de cette société. Ce principe, sacrosaint, constitutionnel et \ninternational, est connu par les juristes en droit humain comme accès à la justice. Maintenant, \nc’est quoi au juste le principe d’accès à la justice ? \nC’est un principe fondamental dans un état de droit et dans une démocratie. En \nattendant la constitutionalisation formelle de ce principe, bientôt avec l’avènement d’une \nnouvelle Constitution j’espère bien, il existe déjà une façon implicite et je dirai supra-\nconstitutionnelle dans notre Constitution. Quand le principe de la démocratie est bien inscrit \net consacré, en anglais on dirait ‘entrenched’, ou pour être plus précis, je dirais sacralisé dans \nl’article 1 de la Constitution. Et, donc, il n’est nullement un principe philosophique ou \npolitique. \n M. le président, d’après ce principe, l’état doit mettre en place des mécanismes, des \nlois, des institutions, des initiatives, des programmes conçus pour fournir des services \njuridiques à des gens qui pourraient avoir des difficultés à avoir des conseils et aussi avoir des \nreprésentations juridiques, comme bien précisé par l’Attorney General. Sans accès à la \njustice, les gens, surtout les pauvres et les démunies de cette société, ne peuvent aspirer à la \njustice, la vraie justice. Alors, la justice ne sera que pour les riches et les fortunés et serait très \nillusoire. L’état de droit, M. le président, et la démocratie, ne sont que des rhétoriques vidées \nde leurs sens.  \n\n100 \n \nLa loi actuelle est complètement dépassée et je dirai, ridicule. Pendant les décennies, la \nloi sur l’aide juridique de 73 bien qu’innovante à cette époque, est restée trop étroite, trop \ncomplexe et trop centralisée et souvent inadaptée aux besoins actuels. Elle a laissé, \nmalheureusement, trop des citoyens à côté, en particulier, les plus pauvres. Et \nmalheureusement, et là, je mets bien l’emphase sur ce point, malheureusement, l’ancien \ngouvernement n’a rien fait pendant dix ans, absolument rien.  Tenez-vous bien, M. le \nprésident – dix ans ! Ils prétendent pourtant souvent, défendre les pauvres mais ils les bernent \navec des rhétoriques creuses, malheureusement.  \nDonc M. le président, aujourd’hui avec ce projet de loi, nous entamons une réforme \nambitieuse et nécessaire. Ce texte donne à l’aide juridique une nouvelle dimension ; celle \nd’un doit humain concret au service de la justice, de l’égalité et la dignité comme bien \nsouligné par   l’Attorney General. Quels sont le point clés de cette réforme ?  Permettez-moi \nde vous présenter les point clés de cette réforme, M. le président.  \nD’abord, comme explique par le ministre de la Justice, on a augmenté le seuil, c’est-à-\ndire le plafond, dérisoire, je dirai, de R 10000 à R 25000. Et, comme bien expliqué, une \npersonne peut avoir un salaire de revenu beaucoup plus de R 25000 et elle sera toujours \nqualifiée par ce seuil. On a aussi relevé le seuil patrimonial de R 500,000 à R 1 million. \nCertaines personnes, évidement, pourtant peut-être bien intentionnées, diront que ce n’est pas \nsuffisant.  Je concède, mais cependant, comme vous savez, on fait face à une situation \néconomique catastrophique léguée par l’ancien régime et pour le moment, on ne peut pas \nfaire mieux. J’espère d’ailleurs que dans trois ou quatre ans, avec une amélioration de la \nsituation économique, on pourra augmenter ce seuil à R 30000 voir R 35000 et le seuil \npatrimonial à R 1.5 million. \nD’ailleurs, pour les cas d’appels, le magistrat ou le juge peut ignorer ce critère. Donc, \non voit aussi, que le projet élargit considérablement le choix de l’aide juridique. Il ne se \nlimite plus aux affaires pénales, il couvre désormais les droits de la famille, les conflits de \ntravail, les violences domestiques. Donc, cela signifie que les femmes victimes de violences, \ndes travailleurs précaires – on en a beaucoup à Maurice – les enfants en danger pourront enfin \nêtre défendus dans ce pays. Donc, il y a aussi une couverture élargie.  \nEt, avec le nouveau projet de loi, il y aura une ouverture élargie des infractions pénales. \nLa loi de 73 couvrait des délits punissables par servitude pénale, or que le nouveau projet de \n\n101 \n \nloi va couvrir des délits passibles d’arrestation. Donc, vous aller convenir avec moi que c’est \nune avancée considérable.  \nOn voit aussi, autre point très important – une décentralisation et une supervision de la \ncour. On est en train de créer une autorité de l’aide juridique, c’est-à-dire, il incombera à la \ncour de district ou à la cour d’appel ou une autre cour qui est décentralisée au niveau de \nchaque district.  Maintenant, il n’y aura pas une simple unité administrative comme dans le \npassé pour la prise des décisions. Auparavant, le Legal Aid Unit était engorgé et c’était une \nunité administrative et certainement trop centralisée. Il y avait des retards conséquents. Donc, \nmaintenant, avec un service décentralisé, il y aura certainement plus de rapidité pour traiter \nles cas. Cela garantie plus de professionnalisme, de rapidité et de transparence sous la \nresponsabilité, sous la supervision d’un magistrat ou un juge. \nTroisièmement, ce nouveau projet de loi va simplifier les procédures ; fini les longs \ndélais, les démarches complexes. Désormais, il n’y aura pas des délais et retards, j’espère. La \nprocédure devient plus simple avec des formulaires simples à remplir qui sont inclus dans \nl’annexe. Cependant, je dois dire que l’Attorney General et le gouvernement ont fait leurs \ntravails, mais il faut un personnel aussi adéquat et dévoué pour faire ce travail. Donc, on vient \nà une autre idée où il y a une sorte de révolution. Si le mot révolution est trop fort, je dirai du \nmoins innovation. \nLe projet de loi impose un devoir légal, cette fois-ci, aux policiers et aussi aux \ntribunaux, d’informer toute personne arrêtée de son droit à l’aide juridique et aussi à \nl’assistance dans leur langue – c’est très important – et immédiatement. On reprend d’ailleurs \ncertaines dispositions de la constitution similaires qui sont consacrées dans l’article 10 de la \nconstitution pour les mettre dans une loi ordinaire à l’encontre d’une loi constitutionnelle. \nC’est cela l’accès à la justice, et non les rhétoriques creuses qui émanaient de l’ancien \ngouvernement. Qui en bénéficiera le plus ? Les pauvres, les oubliés, les enfants placés, les \nréfugiés, les personnes handicapées, certainement. Ceux qui jusqu’ici n’avaient pas les \nmoyens de se défendre, M. le président, ne seront plus jamais seuls cette fois-ci face à la \njustice. Aussi, une emphase particulière a été mise sur les mineurs.  \nLa nouvelle loi protège les mineurs. Les critères d’éligibilité ne s’appliquent pas \nnécessairement. Ils vont bénéficier d’une aide presque, je dirai, automatique. Donc, ceux âgés \nde 14 à 18 ans auront, ce qu’on appelle, une protection renforcée. Dans un État démocratique, \n\n102 \n \nc’est très important. Même en absence des parents, les mineurs pourront bénéficier de l’aide \njuridique et de l’assistance. \nL’aide aux mineurs n’était pas automatique sous l’empire de l’ancienne loi. Aussi, pour \nqu’il n’y ait pas d’abus – d’ailleurs, l’Attorney General a bien mis de l’emphase sur ce point \n–, on a pris certaines précautions, en vertu de l’article 12 de ce projet de loi qui prévoit des \nsanctions plus sévères.  \nPar exemple, il y a une amende de R 1 million et trois ans de prison pour des fausses \ninformations. La loi est aussi plus stricte contre la définition des assets sous l’empire de ce \nnouveau projet de loi, ce qui est un point très important pour qu’il n’y ait pas d’abus par \ncertaines personnes sans scrupules. \nAutre point que je remarque, M. le président, et honorables membres, ce projet de loi \ns’inspire également des meilleurs principes internationaux. Je vous invite à lire l’United \nNations Principles and Guidelines on Access to Legal Aid, un document très important. Je \npense que d’ailleurs, l’honorable Attorney General, votre bureau s’est inspiré de certains de \nces principes. \nMaurice rejoint un mouvement mondial pour humaniser les droits. C’est très important \nd’humaniser les droits et de les mettre au service des démunis et des pauvres de notre société. \nMais on ne doit pas dormir sur nos lauriers. Honorables membres, pourquoi ? Parce que \nl’essentiel reste à venir. Il faut mettre en œuvre cette loi. Elle doit être accompagnée par des \nmoyens humains, surtout financiers et aussi institutionnels. Les policiers, les magistrats, les \navocats doivent être formés. Le public doit être informé, point capital, je dirai, important.  \nLes résultats doivent être suivis, évalués et aussi publiés. Le gouvernement et le \nministre de la Justice ont certainement fait un travail remarquable.  \nJe suis en train de conclure, M. le président. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Merci. \nMr Narsinghen: Il faut veiller à ce que la cour fasse son travail et veiller à ce que les \navocats ou les avoués fassent aussi leur travail. Qui pourra évaluer si l’avocat désigné pro \nbono a bien fait son travail ? Ce n’est pas parce que c’est pro bono qu’il faut bâcler le travail, \nM. le président. Il faut aussi des règles qui émanent de l’autorité judiciaire pour sanctionner, \nje dirai bien, les quelques brebis galeuses de la profession légale. \n\n103 \n \nC’est beaucoup plus qu’une réforme. C’est un engagement démocratique. Ce \ngouvernement ne se sert pas seulement des rhétoriques sans agir. Engageons-nous \npleinement, honorables membres, pour faire vivre cette loi. Faisons en sorte qu’à Maurice, la \njustice ne soit ni un privilège, ni une marché, mais qu’un droit réel est garanti pour toutes et \ntous. Il faut, avec le temps, faire disparaître la pratique de droit à deux vitesses ou du moins \ncette perception du droit à deux vitesses. \nPersonne n’est au-dessus de la loi. Même pas, d’ailleurs, les magistrats, les juges et les \nemployés dans le judiciaire. Ensemble avec eux, on doit éradiquer cette réalité décriée ou du \nmoins cette perception. Ce gouvernement, avec une série de législations récentes, prouve \nqu’il va au-delà des rhétoriques creuses comme l’ancien gouvernement, malheureusement, \nqui se tient avec honneur dans le camp des démunis de ce présent gouvernement. \nUn gouvernement socialiste – oui, socialiste, je dirai, modéré, mais aussi responsable. \nOn peut être un grand socialiste, mais responsable. Les deux leaders de cette alliance croient \ndans la consolidation de notre démocratie et les élus de cette alliance y croient aussi.  \nMerci pour votre attention, M. le président. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you.  \nHon. Seeburn! \n(4.44 p.m.) \nMr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle): Thank you, \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Today, I rise to support the introduction of the proposed Legal Aid \nand Legal Assistance Bill. This Bill is an initiative that reflects the strong political will and \ncommitment of our Government to strengthen the rule of law.  \nThis Bill upholds one of the most fundamental principles of our democracy, our \nConstitution and our shared values as Mauritians. By modernising our legal aid system, the \nBill has demonstrated a deep awareness of the everyday struggles faced by our citizens, \nparticularly those who have long been left behind due to financial constraints.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, access to justice is a right. A right that is enriched in our \nConstitution, but that right remains out of reach for too many citizens of our country today. \nToo many people from vulnerable groups, low-income households from different walks of \nlife are effectively denied access to justice simply because they cannot afford legal \n\n104 \n \nrepresentation. In both civil and criminal matters, these people face the court alone, often \nconfused and disadvantaged. This is not justice.    \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the former Chief Justice Lord David Neuberger of the \nSupreme Court of the United Kingdom and also the President of the Judicial Committee of \nthe Privy Council has repeatedly emphasised that access to justice is a corner stone of the rule \nof law. He warned that lack of legal aid funding with rising court fees and complex \nprocedures risk is turning justice into a privilege for the wealthy rather than a right for all. \nHe argued that justice must be affordable. Justice must be available to everyone, \nregardless of income. Government has a duty, not only to create the laws, but to ensure that \nordinary people can afford their rights. He went on to say that without meaningful access to \nthe courts, the rule of law is weakened and the public confidence in justice is undermined. \n In short, Chief Justice Lord David Neuberger emphasised that access to justice is \nessential for the functioning of a democracy and for fairness in any modern society. He said \nthat legal aid is the glue that holds the rule of law together.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in Mauritius, judges, legal professionals, the Bar Association \nand the civil society have repeatedly, over the years, raised concerns over the limitations of \nthe current legal aid system with insufficient remuneration to the current legal aid, with \ninsufficient remuneration for legal aid lawyers, and their narrow scope of eligibility. But what \ndid the previous government do? As the hon. Attorney General said earlier, nothing. They \nignored the calls, they ignored the people, they ignored their duty. \nDuring all that time, too many citizens were denied legal representation simply because \nthey could not afford it. Too many cases were delayed or abandoned by persons from \nvulnerable groups. Women stayed in abusive relationships. Too many children suffered in \ncustody disputes and too many elderly and other citizens were left without recourse to justice. \nThat is not neglect. That is injustice. Here, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the previous MSM \ngovernment had a duty to ensure equal access to justice. But unfortunately, they failed to \naddress the issues during the past ten years in power. \nJustice has been delayed. As the former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, \nWilliam Gladstone, said – \n“Justice delayed is justice denied.” \n\n105 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, our hon. Attorney General was right in his public address to \ndescribe the justice system in Mauritius as ‘slow, intimidating and out of reach’, and in \naffirming his commitment to infrastructure upgrades, digital tools, expanding courts capacity, \nand reform in legal aid laws. \nToday, he rightly said that this Bill occupies a special place in his four decades of \npractice. Unlike the previous government, we are taking immediate steps to make legal aid \nfair, functional and accessible. By introducing this Bill, we are widening the scope of \neligibility to the people of Mauritius.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this Legal Aid and Legal Assistance Bill is a modern \nlegislation that seeks to reform and revitalise our legal aid system which has served our \npeople for decades but is now, more than ever, in urgent need of review to meet the realities \nof today. It has an objective to make legal aid and legal assistance accessible to all those who \ncannot afford legal representation in civil criminal proceedings before any court of law by \nwidening the range of offences and increasing the ceiling of monthly earnings. \nSection 4 of the Bill imposes an obligation on the court to inform a person of his rights \nto legal aid before the start of proceedings to which that person is a party. The Bill also \nprovides a right to legal assistance under section 10 and imposes an obligation on a Police \nOfficer who is in charge of a Police Station to inform a suspect, upon arrest, that he may \nmake an application for legal assistance during the recording of a statement under warning, \nand also, for bail application. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this Bill affirms the idea that justice should never be reserved \nfor a few but be made accessible to everyone. Section 8 of the Bill empowers the court to \ngrant legal aid to all applicants who meet the criteria under section 5 of the Act. It further \nempowers the court with a discretionary power to grant legal aid to the applicants even if \ntheir assets exceed Rs1 million after having regard to all the circumstances of the case, and in \nthe interests of justice. \nIn fact, the Bill proposes a modern, fair legal aid system that will qualify more low-\nincome individuals for free legal assistance in criminal and civil matters and make sure that \nthe system is transparent and efficient. Section 9 and section 14 of the Bill ensures that legal \naid and legal assistance are available to juveniles through their parents, legal guardians or \nother persons. It further ensures that if no one is available to represent the juvenile, the court \nwill go ahead to grant the legal aid. \n\n106 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Bill provides that upon application through sworn \naffidavit, it is the court that shall assign a barrister or an attorney or both. Barristers and \nattorneys who have been assigned shall not refuse assistance without furnishing good reasons \nto Chief Justice and payment will be done to the lawyers from the Consolidated Fund as \nspecified in section 15 of the Bill. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, to make the system more effective, the Bill further provides \nthat if there is an award for costs in favour of the applicant who was granted legal aid, then \nthe said award for cost shall be deemed to be in favour of the government unless specified \notherwise and shall be recovered by the Attorney General and deposited in the Consolidated \nFund as stated in section 16 of the Act. The Bill further makes provision under section 17 to \nexempt those who were granted legal aid from payment of stamp duty, registration dues, \nusher fees, witnesses fees and court fees. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this Bill gives a wide range of powers to the Chief Justice to \nact independently and make such rules as he or she thinks fit for purpose of the Act. In fact, \nthe Bill demonstrates a thoughtful balance between legal expertise and social responsibility \nand a clear sign that our legal institutions are evolving to meet the real needs of our people. \nThis effort is to modernise and expand legal aid and to make it more inclusive and accessible. \nThis is a significant milestone in the pursuit of a more just and equitable society. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Rosalie Abella, a puisne judge from the Supreme Court of \nCanada says that there is no justice without access, it is as simple and as complex as that. And \ngoes on to state that access to justice is the most basic human right and without it other rights \nare meaningless. Justice must be accessible in practice not just in principle. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we are building a justice system that treats everyone with \ndignity, with fairness, no matter how low the income or background is. In Mauritius, the law \nsays that everyone is equal before the law but in real life we know that not everyone has the \nsame ability to access justice. Many Mauritians cannot afford a lawyer; many Mauritians do \nnot know their rights. Others do not know the complex procedures of the court. This means \nthat for many Mauritians going to court whether for a family matter, a land dispute or a \ncriminal charge is frightening, expensive and sometimes impossible. This Bill is about \nchanging that and reinforcing that right.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, legal aid is an investment in the strength and credibility of our \njustice system. Countries around the world have shown that where legal aid is accessible and \n\n107 \n \nefficient, wrongful convictions are decreased, public trust in institutions rises, as such it is a \nvital part of any democratic society to ensure that everyone has access to a fair and effective \njustice system not in theory but in reality. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, before I conclude, I would like to take this opportunity to \nshow my appreciation and thanks to the hon. Attorney General and his dedicated State Law \nOffice team for their outstanding work, for coming up with this modern and progressive piece \nof legislation that reflects not only a deep understanding of the legal challenges faced by the \nvulnerable communities in Mauritius but also a firm commitment of upholding the principles \nof fairness, access and justice for all. \nThis Bill is a commitment to the people we have been elected to serve. It is a Bill that \nprides itself on the equality, dignity and social justice. We must ensure that access to justice \nis for everyone. Let this Parliament be remembered for restoring the people’s faith in justice \nand see this Bill as a declaration of our shared humanity and commitment on equity. We must \nwork together, the government, the civil society, legal professionals and citizens to ensure \nthat justice must not only be done, it must be seen to be done and felt in every corner of our \nsociety. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with these words, I commend the Bill to the House. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. I think it is the right time to suspend. I suspend the \nsitting for half an hour. \nAt 4.55 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.32 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Please be seated! Hon. Ms Collet! \nMs M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues): Merci, M. le président. Donc, ce \nprojet de loi s’inscrit dans le programme gouvernemental 2025-2029 intitulé ‘Bridging the \nGap’, qui cherche à réduire les inégalités et à rendre la justice plus proche des gens.  \nVous vous souviendrez, M. le président, de ma question parlementaire de mars dernier, \nsur les mesures envisagées par ce gouvernement pour garantir l’accès à la justice pour les \ncitoyens vulnérables de notre république. D’ailleurs, la Judiciary Newsletter de mars de cette \nannée contient un article consacré à ce sujet qu’est le legal aid and legal assistance. \nD’emblée, je tiens à remercier l’Attorney General et son bureau, ainsi que le gouvernement \npour cette initiative responsable et utile compte tenu des réalités économiques que notre \n\n108 \n \npeuple fait face en ce moment. C’est une réforme importante, attendue depuis longtemps qui \nva permettre à plus de citoyens d’avoir accès à un homme de loi et une représentation légale \nadéquate, à être défendus peu importe leur situation financière. \nAu risque de répéter ce que mes collègues ont déjà mentionné, je tiens néanmoins à \nexprimer mon plein accord avec les points qu’ils ont soulevés. Ce projet de loi vise trois \ngrands objectifs. En premier lieu, ce projet de loi vise à mettre à jour une loi qui date de 1973, \navec des critères qui ont plus d’une cinquantaine d’années, une loi révisée pour la dernière \nfois en 2012. En second lieu, ce projet de loi vise à faciliter l’accès à une justice équitable \npour les familles modestes compte tenu de la cherté de la vie et des changements de notre \nsociété et l’éloignement de Rodrigues de la capitale judiciaire qu’est Port Louis, là où se \nconcentre la majorité des hommes de loi, ainsi que le palais de justice.  \nEn troisième lieu, M. le président, ce projet de loi vise à renforcer les droits des \ncitoyens dès le début des procédures judiciaires avec des premières étapes qui s’avèrent \nsouvent complexes et techniques et décisives pour les procès. Comme l’a fait ressortir \nl’Attorney General, ainsi que mes collègues l’honorable Narsinghen et l’honorable Seeburn, \nles conditions pour obtenir l’aide légale ont été élargies. Les seuils d’éligibilité ont été ajustés \nde manière raisonnable dans le but de facilité le recours à la justice pour un plus grand \nnombre de citoyens aux frais de l’Etat. Désormais, les biens pris en compte incluent les \nmaisons, voitures, compte en banque, cryptomonnaie et parts dans les entreprises. \nM. le président, au sein de notre république, toute personne accusée a le droit d’être \ndéfendue. C’est un droit inscrit dans notre loi suprême, la Constitution, mais ce droit doit être \nréel, tangible. Avec cette loi d’actualité, ce gouvernement s’engage à rendre le droit d’être \ndéfendu accessible à tous, même pendant une enquête policière ou une demande de caution. \nLes mineurs entre 14 et 18 ans recevront automatiquement de l’aide, même sans devoir \npasser par leurs parents.  \nPour la continuité, M. le président, ce projet de loi donne au chef juge les moyens de \ncréer des règles adaptées pour bien faire fonctionner le système les règles existant sous la loi \nde 1973 ayant été révisées il y a cinq ans de cela, et ceci dans un souci d’encourager les \nhommes de loi – attorneys, barristers – à s’engager et à offrir leurs services in forma \npauperis.  \nJ’ai pris note qu’à Rodrigues, les professionnels qui se déplacent pour offrir des \nservices in forma pauperis jouent un rôle essentiel dans la garantie de l’accès à la justice pour \n\n109 \n \nles plus démunis. Il est donc crucial de prévoir des solutions logistiques adaptées, \nl’hébergement adéquat, afin de soutenir l’engagement de ces hommes de loi sur le terrain. Et \nles policiers, les magistrats, les juges et les hommes de loi devront informer les potentiels \nbénéficiaires dans une langue qu’ils comprennent. Bien évidemment, à Rodrigues, c’est le \ncréole. \nÀ Rodrigues, beaucoup de gens ne savent pas encore qu’ils ont droit à cette aide \njuridique ou ils n’osent pas demander de l’aide juridique. Ce projet de loi vient répondre à \ncette réalité, M. le président. Cette aide légale va couvrir non seulement les affaires civiles \ncomme les problèmes familiaux, les litiges de terrains, mais aussi des affaires pénales, zafair \nlapolis, comme on dit souvent dans le jargon. \nM. le président, ce gouvernement veut alléger les charges financières de nos \nconcitoyens en supprimant certains frais de justice, ce qui va vraiment soulager les familles \nmodestes.  \nCe projet est là pour aider – \n• \nun conjoint délaissé qui veut se défaire d’une union civile qui ne fonctionne et qui \nne fonctionnera jamais ; \n• \nun père ou une mère démuni(e) qui veut avoir accès à son enfant ; \n• \nun jeune accusé à tort, entre autres, qui mérite un avenir prospère. Il pourra avoir \nde l’assistance légale pendant l’enquête judiciaire ainsi que de l’aide légale pour \nêtre libéré sous caution. \nMais pour que tout cela fonctionne, M. le président, chacun doit faire sa part. Nous \navons tous notre rôle à jouer. J’apprécie que les professionnels du droit, les officiers de \njustice, les magistrats et les policiers auront un rôle crucial. Qu’ils soient et restent les \ngardiens de l’équité. Qu’ils soient flexibles, justes et humains. \nM. le président, les citoyens doivent aussi savoir que l’aide juridique est non seulement \nun droit, mais aussi une responsabilité. Il faut coopérer, faire une application, être honnête et \nrespecter les procédures. Cette réforme était non seulement nécessaire, mais urgente.  \n\n110 \n \nConnaître le véritable bien de la communauté, c’est ce qui constitue la science de la \nlégislation. « L’art consiste à trouver les moyens de le réaliser (…). » Je crois en cette \nphilosophie de Jeremy Bentham, M. le président. Comme Bentham, que je viens de citer, je \npense que cette loi doit servir le bien commun. Et ce projet de loi va dans ce sens.  \nAvec ce texte de loi, nous rendons la justice plus proche, plus accessible et plus juste. \nJ’invite, donc, mes collègues à soutenir ce projet avec responsabilité et engagement. \nEnsemble, construisons une justice qui sert tout le monde.  \nSur ce, je soumets ce projet de loi à l’examen de cette Assemblée. Merci beaucoup. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Merci. \nHon. Dr. Prayag! \n(5.47 p.m.) \nDr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart): Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir, distinguished Members of the House, I wish to thank you for giving me the \nprivilege to address this august Assembly on this important legislation, that is, the Legal Aid \nand Legal Assistance Bill.  \nAs a doctor who has witnessed the human consequences of delayed or denied justice, I \nrise to address the proposed repeal and replacement of the Legal Aid and Legal Assistance \nAct at a time that lies at an intersection, an intersection of human rights, fairness and dignity, \nas rightly pointed by the hon. Attorney General. \nPlease, allow me to be clear, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Today, legal is not an easily \naccessible privilege, and it has not been one for the last decade. Due to the devaluation of our \nrupee together with the previous eligibility criteria, many are those who did not know on \nwhich door to knock when they suddenly had to face legal charges and get legal counsel \novernight. The new threshold of not exceeding Rs25,000 and define assets value not \nexceeding Rs1 million makes legal aid accessible again to the needy. I congratulate the hon. \nPrime Minister, the Deputy Prime Minister and the Attorney General for this endeavour. \n\n111 \n \nThe old law had made almost all relevant provisions, but in practice, it was not applied \nas it should. The new law should make provisions so as it does not remain an academic \nlegislation without any real impact on access to justice.  \nThis new reenacted Bill has an objective – \n• to make it more accessible for persons with low income, and  \n• those who cannot afford legal representation: to have access to justice in civil \nand criminal proceedings before any court in Mauritius.  \nThis legislation will ensure that justice does not remain in the domain of the wealthy, but \nbecomes a lived reality for all Mauritians regardless of income. \nI am not a barrister and I humbly stand to be corrected by fellow learned members of \nthe legal profession. Yet, the truth is our current system pertaining to legal aid and legal \nassistance is falling behind. Let us agree that one of the key issues today is the bureaucratic \nand outdated process.  \nLes dossiers traînent, les retards s’accumulent et la frustration s’installe. Ces délais \ndécouragent beaucoup de personnes d’exercer leur droit à l’aide juridique. Quelques fois, les \ngens se perdent littéralement dans le système à cause de cette lourdeur bureaucratique.  \nM. le président, time is justice, delay is denial. Whilst reflecting about the process, I \nalso feel the necessity to highlight the need for digitalisation and streamlining of the legal aid \napplication process. Let us not be the architects of that old system, where divorce through \nprivate counsel takes two to three months today, while through legal aid, it drags for a year. I, \nsomehow, now feel that Clause 6 of this new Bill, more specifically Clause 6 (2) (b), must be \nclearly defined by a prescribed time limit so as not to delay justice.  \nIn addition, for such a legislation to work, I find it essential that Police Officers, \nespecially those of senior rank, be empowered and trained to conduct real-time means testing \nand merits testing, particularly during weekends or after hours when courts are closed. We \ncannot allow someone to be detained overnight simply because no one was present to assess \nhis or her eligibility. As a comparison, I wish to refer the House to the current UK procedure, \nwhere a duty solicitor is on call, readily available to represent an accused at any time of the \nday or night, subject to eligibility.  \n\n112 \n \nUnfortunately, under the draft before, the burden was being placed on the accused to \nprove their eligibility via an affidavit sworn before a District Court. But what if someone is \narrested at 8.00 p.m. on a Saturday night? The court is closed at that time and an affidavit \ncannot be sworn. Then, what happens? Does this mean the person remains in detention \nwithout a voice? Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this is neither fair nor just. If we are reforming this \nlaw, we must build clarity, accessibility and fairness into its procedures.  \nAs we are aware, it is already the practice in Mauritius for a Superintendent or \nAssistant Superintendent of Police to remain on duty after office hours in every Police \nDivision across the island. I shall propose that this designated officer is given proper training \nin legal aid screening and be empowered to receive a sworn statement of proof on eligibility. \nIn the past, in Mauritius, I can recall that a Superintendent of Police had the legal power to \ngrant bail.  \nI hereby wish to mention that it is both reasonable and practical that such officers be \nentrusted with initial decisions on legal assistance as well. This measure would immediately \nbring fairness into the room. It is hereby time to see the practicalities of such a legislation. \nThis new legislation will work, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir.  \nThe previous Act did not impose an obligation on the statement-recording Police \nOfficer to inform the person that he may make an application for legal assistance during the \nrecording of the statement. \nHowever, I still personally don’t find it sufficient. We need to correct the mischief. The \nmischief of the law enforcing officer to escape the imposition of such an obligation of him or \nher. The same mischief – the hon. Attorney-General will agree with me – that has \nunfortunately been played for years and years. It is to my opinion that the information of \naccess to legal aid must be imperatively added as part of the official police caution.  \nTo make my point, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I need to say that the right to legal \nrepresentation is not merely theoretical, it must be stated clearly and immediately upon arrest; \nthis is the norm in some jurisdictions, for example: the United States of America. It goes \nwithout saying that police abuse will decrease by imposing on the law enforcing officers to \ninform the accused of the right to legal aid upon caution.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, when police officers know that detainees are aware of their \nrights, they tend to be more diligent in the delivery of their duties, and especially, when those \n\n113 \n \nrights are actually exercisable. We must also take practical steps to ensure public awareness. I \npropose that clear notices on legal aid rights be affixed in all police stations, in all court \nhouses, even in all Citizen Advice Bureau, and that also, in English, French as well as Creole. \nMany Mauritians still do not know what they are entitled to. This simple visible step can \nchange lives.  \nAnother significant point is that prompt payment to Attorneys and Counsels is vital. If \nwe expect them to take up sensitive cases, including those of rape, drugs, assault, eviction, \noften on short notice, we must honour them with timely payment otherwise participation in \nthe system will dwindle and we will be left with an empty shell of law. To me, this is a clear \nway to increasing the true value of the service and I believe it is a matter that mandates urgent \naction.  \nAs the law is being repealed and replaced, the new Act should clearly list the types of \ncases eligible. I have been informed that in practice legal aid currently covers property related \nmatters, evictions, family law matters, and criminal cases as well as appellant cases across the \nvarious courts in our jurisdiction but this should not be left to guess work, clarity brings \nconfidence, that is why I would request your permission, and take a moment here to brush a \npicture of victims of medical negligence.  \nAs founder and President of the Medical Protection Society of Mauritius, I have \nwitnessed cases where patients suffer in silence, lacking both voice and recourse. Yes, in \naddition to extending legal aid to more women by, for example: partage post-divorce and \nlicitation, we have had debates on this matter these few weeks. Legal aid must recognise and \nrespond to the needs of those who have suffered due to medical malpractice and negligence. \nThis is a category of litigation that is growing; we cannot leave these victims behind. Medical \nnegligence cases are often complexed, emotionally charged and financially crippling. The \nvery individual who suffers from misdiagnosis, surgical errors or systemic failures in our \nhealthcare institutions, are the least likely to afford quality legal representation.  \nAre we, as law makers, prepared to tell them that justice is a privilege that they cannot \nafford? Take for instance the case of a young mother from a modest background who lost her \nnewborn due to a delayed emergency caesarean section, an avoidable tragedy, later confirmed \nby a medical review. Devastated, she was determined to seek accountability but without the \nmeans to hire a lawyer, she was left without being able to afford a legal recourse. My \npersonal assessment is that such legislation, if properly applied, can bring more confidence to \n\n114 \n \nthe person approaching the court. The delay of two years to pursue government institutions \naccording to the Public Officers Act, makes it difficult for low income-earners to find money \nduring this period of time, hence, making it impossible to seek justice and repair.  \nAs a Doctor, I can assure the House that such measures will bring more diligence in the \nnoble work of medical and paramedical personnel and ultimately, better care in our health \ncare institutions. On ne peut plus accepter de continuer à voir les victimes dépourvues ou \nlaissées pour compte. J’ai témoigné à maintes occasions des victimes finissant par accepter \ntoute sorte de remède à la fin. \nBefore drawing my conclusion, I wish to state that if this Legal Aid and Legal \nAssistance Act, were to be embedded under a main overarching framework, such as the \nmodel of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act in the United Kingdom as announced on \nseveral occasions by the hon. Prime Minister, it would carry more structural authority and \nlegal weight. Housing this legislation under a primary Act that governs procedural fairness \nand rights, during arrest and investigation, would ensure greater coherence, consistency and \nenforceability across all related processes. It would also reflect our seriousness in placing \naccess to justice at the core of our criminal justice system.  \nIn conclusion, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let us be clear-eyed, this is just not a legal \ndocument we are debating, it is a gateway to justice for the voiceless. We must ensure that \naccess to justice is practical, prompt and protective. This new Legal Aid and Legal Assistance \nAct must be bold enough to correct the mischiefs of the past, compassionate enough to \nunderstand the realities of the present and wise enough to future proof the rights of \ngenerations to come. Justice delayed is justice denied, but justice denied because of poverty is \ninjustice institutionalised. Let us all not allow that to happen.  \nIn conclusion, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I must commend this Bill to the House. Thank \nyou. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. \nHon. Lobine! \n(5.55 p.m.) \nMr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix): Thank you, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir. \n\n115 \n \nLet me first of all, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, thank the hon. Attorney-General for \nbringing this Bill to the House. It is clear that careful thinking has gone into the drafting of \nthis legislation and I also thank the officers of the State Law Office for this very clear drafting \nwith regards to this particular piece of legislation.  \nThe hon. Attorney-General spoke earlier on about consolidating the Welfare State. This \nis one aspect as to how this government is consolidating the Welfare State, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir. And unfortunately, when we are debating such an important Bill, again, the \nother side, only three Members, all of them are absent. It is a very important piece of \nlegislation, they are not participating but at least they should be here, present to show \ncompassion as to the consolidation of the Welfare State because we are talking about \naccessibility to justice to the most vulnerable people of our society. So, again, history will \njudge those Members of the Opposition who are always absent and who are always not here \nto participate in debates with regard to this important piece of legislation, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir. \nWhy legal aid matters, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir? It goes beyond words because it goes \nto the very foundation of our Constitution. Section 10 of our Constitution is the foundation \nthat guarantees that one should not be denied access to justice because of lack of means and \nthat every accused person must receive a fair trial including the right to legal representation \nwhen necessary to secure justice.  \nThis principle, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, is at the heart of our legal aid framework. It \nensures that access to justice is not just a privilege for the wealthy but a constitutional right \nfor all Mauritians. Here, I would take the words of hon. Ms Collet when she rightly pointed \nout that we are bringing a new law after more than 50 years. The previous Legal Aid Act was \nin 1973. It was brought by the then Labour Government establishing and consolidating the \nWelfare State and it was amended again in 2012 under a Labour Government, again, to \nconsolidate the Welfare State. \nAnd, this was again done Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, after a report of Lord Mackay of \nClashfern. Again in 1998, the then Labour-led government, we had a report from Lord \nMackay, ‘Access to Justice, Reform to the Justice System and Legal Aid Reform. And those \nreforms were already mentioned, and it is as per those recommendations that in 2012, \namendment was brought and the amendment expanded the scope from legal aid alone to \n\n116 \n \ninclude legal assistance. This was done in 2012, covering advice and support earlier in the \nprocess like police inquires and bail. \nThis was a step forward for access to justice, especially, for juveniles but beyond that \nsingle reform, the system remined largely frozen, thresholds stayed outdated. There was no \nclear statutory duty to inform people of their rights. And, here, as rightly pointed out by hon. \nDr. Prayag, there should be more clarity. But this particular piece of legislation, in this Bill, \nclarity is provided, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to Clause 4 – The Right to legal aid.  \nNow, it is an obligation on our Court of justice to ensure, to tell anyone who is being \naccused or standing trial that before the start of the proceeding to which that person is a party, \ninform him in a language in which he is conversant that he may make an application for legal \naid under this Act. This is now in the law. \n And it goes further, again, the right to legal assistance, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, at \nClause 10 – it is also the duty of a police officer in charge of the police station to inform that \nperson that he may make an application for legal assistance during police enquiry, including \nlegal advice. So, this is also now being enacted; it will become a law. \nHowever, as pointed out by hon. Dr. Prayag, in practice, how will it work? How do we \ncommunicate? What is the timeframe that will be set up to look at all these applications? \nWhat about the status of the number of personnel that will be allocated in different courts of \njustice to process those applications? Whether those people who do not know the law or who \nare not able to access information as to whether they are eligible for legal aid? Who will go \nand inform these people? \nHere, hon. Dr. Prayag had mentioned that we should, in the court of justice or even in \npublic places, have clear billboards informing people. This is done in the UK, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir – in the UK, people are informed and pamphlets are also given at the Court of \nJustice. What are your rights? What can you be doing? What you cannot do?  \nSo, for legal aid as well, I think there should be a campaign of dissemination to inform \nthe public at large what they can do and what they cannot do and who are eligible. And again, \nwith regard to the report of Lord Mackay, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the report spoke about the \ncreation of an independent legal aid authority, creating an independent body responsible for \nadministering legal aid, ensuring transparency, efficiency and impartiality. So, maybe when \nthe hon. Attorney General will sum up, he might give us some indications whether in the near \nfuture, they would consider setting up a legal aid authority, as recommended by Lord Mackay \n\n117 \n \nand as also being opined by the Law Reform Commission, way back in 2011, whereby the \nCommission said – it is an Opinion Paper of the Law Reform Commission, in February 2011, \nI quote – \n“[The Commission is of the opinion] that the current legal aid system is certainly in \nneed of reform [legal aid should include legal advice (and should not be restricted to \nlegal representation) and a Legal Aid Board or Commission should be established].” \nIn the current system, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, again, I am humbly voicing out my \nopinion because I have been speaking to various colleagues of the profession and I salute the \nlegal profession, hundreds of attorneys and hundreds of counsels, barristers who are working \nin this system of the legal aid, who are giving pro-bono services. And, I salute their efforts \nbecause most of those barristers and attorneys are compassionate and they deliver against all \npublic perceptions that they might have against the legal profession. Most barristers do no \ncharge a single cent for most of the cases from government from the Legal Aid Unit. They do \nit pro bono, seriously and compassionately and they take the case as if it is their own case \nwhich has been paid by an independent person that would come and knock at the door. So, I \nsalute the legal profession, I salute all attorneys and barristers who are working within the \nsystem. \nAgain, however, there are certain issues that I wish to raise with regard to separation of \npowers, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. We are giving unfretted powers to the Chief Justice to \ndetermine fees to be paid to barristers and attorneys from the Consolidated Fund. Maybe, it is \nnot the right time for us – we are consolidating democracy, whether is it not high time also to \nopen the debates, whether the legal profession should be independent, not just in the sense of \nthe word, ‘independent’ in the way we operate. The legal aid system should not be under the \numbrella of the court and of the Chief Justice. There should be an independent legal aid \nauthority – independent, impartial, that would look at all the procedures and put in place this \nvery beautiful piece of legislation.  \nSo, I would invite the hon. Attorney General to consider same and also consider the \ntimeframe as being proposed by the hon. Dr. Prayag at Clause 6 of this Bill – Application for \nlegal aid. There should be a certain time limit to process because we know how it functions \nand we know the bureaucracy that it involves in those people looking where to go to search \nfor legal aid and how their applications are being processed.  \n\n118 \n \nSo, theses are my contributions as to the debate on this particular piece of legislation \nwhich is a beautiful piece of legislation, which is also something that we should commend, \nespecially … \nAn hon Member: Beautiful! \nMr Lobine: These are the debates; we can’t have everything good in a piece of law. \nSo, the strength of this new Bill is that it updates eligibility threshold. This is very \nimportant. It will touch the most vulnerable. It also gives the duty on courts and on the police \nofficer to inform people. It is now mandatory; it is legal for them to inform people that they \nare eligible for legal aid.  \nAnd, of course, it is also something that is very important that is being introduced – \npreserving the automatic protection for juveniles. This aligns us. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, \nwith the obligations under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. \n So, theses are my contribution to this piece of legislation and I shall certainly support \nthis Bill and I invite the hon. Attorney General to consider the humble suggestion that I am \nmaking on behalf of the profession and also, with regard to this issue of separation of powers. \nThank you.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister Subron! \n(6.07 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity (Mr A. Subron): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is with a sense of duty, as a Minister, as a member of \nthe National Assembly and as a spokesperson of Rezistans ek Alternativ, that I speak in \nsupport of the Legal Aid and Legal Assistance Bill, presented by the hon. Attorney General.  \nSitting next to him in the National Assembly, I know that this Bill has been one his \npriorities since he took his seat in this House. On several occasions, he has shared his views \nwith me on what amount would constitute a reasonable criterion for entitlement to legal aid. \nEven just a few days ago, we were still exchanging views on this matter. Well, this afternoon, \nthis Bill is just minutes away from being adopted. I would like to place on record, my deep \nappreciation for the enlightened vision of the hon. Attorney General in bringing forward this \namendment.  \n\n119 \n \nNow, let me share my input on this debate. Let me begin with a fundamental question: \nwhat is justice? Justice, as we conceive it today, has evolved from long, often violent and \nunjust past. \nThere was a time, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, when justice was designed, administered by \nthe powerful for the powerful. There was time where disputes were resolved through personal \nvengeance. A perceived wrong was met with a bullet or a rope. Reminiscence of the era of \ncowboys where shooting someone or hanging them in the town square was considered \njustice. This was the rule of the strongest. But society has since evolved. Modern justice has \nbecome institutional. It is the State and a genuine democracy that now assumes the \nresponsibility for law and order. \nIt is the State that ensures the application of justice through structured, independent \nlegal systems. But even within this evolution, we must acknowledge a painful truth. We still \nlive in a deeply class-based society. There are the rich. There are the poor. In this unequal \nsociety, justice often comes with a cost. One that many cannot afford. This cost becomes a \nbarrier to equality, a denial of justice. In fact, for a significant proportion of our population, \nespecially those from disadvantaged socio-economic backgrounds, justice remains \ninaccessible. \nIn a patriarchal society, where relation between men and women are often unequal, this \ndenial of justice becomes more pronounced. There is hidden exploitation, abuse and violence. \nMany women find themselves at the mercy of injustices without the financial means or \ninstitutional support to defend themselves. In these circumstances, access to justice becomes \nnot merely a procedural right, but a fundamental human right. \nAccess to justice is not just a principle. It is enshrined in international law. Mauritius is \na signatory of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) which in, \nArticles 14(1) and 14 (3)(d), recognise the right to legal aid, especially in criminal cases. The \nCovenant insists that no person should be denied the right to a fair trial due to lack of \nresources. The right to defend oneself in a court of law is a cornerstone of justice. \nWhile Article 14(3)(d) of the ICCPR specifically guaranteed legal aid in criminal cases \nfor those who lack the means to pay for legal representations, Article 14(1) establishes the \nbroader principle that all persons are equal before the courts and tribunal. In essence, the right \nto justice cannot be the privilege of the wealthy. It is the right of every citizen.  \n\n120 \n \nThe Human Rights Committee has further clarified that legal aid should also be \nextended to civil and administrative cases, especially when fundamental rights are at stake. \nVictims of torture, victims of sexual violence and children are the groups for who whom \naccess to justice must be guaranteed. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let us look at the broader picture. In a class-based society, \naccess to justice is not distributed equally. Those with the means can afford the best lawyer. \nSome of them are found in this House! They know the system, and they can navigate it. But \nwhat about the poor, the working people, the ordinary citizens? What of the vulnerable? \nOften, they do not even know their rights. \nThey are intimidated by the complexity of the legal system. They lack legal literacy. \nThey cannot afford legal representation and they are left voiceless. Let us not mince our \nwords. The justice system across the world, as it currently operates, is often biased in favour \nof the powerful. There are systemic biases. People of the disadvantaged backgrounds face \nharsher penalties, less favourable outcomes and delayed justice. This is not justice. This is a \nstructural violence. \nAccess to justice, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, means more often than just the ability to set \ninto a court room. It means having the knowledge, the support and the representation needed \nto assert one’s rights. It means able to understand legal procedures. It means having the legal \nassistance to pursue a legal case. It means not being excluded of poverty, language or social \nstatus. If we fail to provide this, the consequences are dire. We will reinforce inequality, we \nwill erode public trust in the legal system, and we will invite social unrest and instability. \nTo address this, it is important that we support legal aid and pro bono services. We \nshould work to increase legal literacy and consider reforms to the legal system itself. \nInvestigating in alternative dispute resolution is also essential. Ultimately, we need to create a \nsystem that works for everyone, not only for those can afford it. The Legal Aid and Legal \nAssistance Bill, by the hon. Attorney General, must be situated in this broader context of full \naccess to justice. \nThis amendment to enlarge access to justice for our people forms part of a broader \ndemocratic process. Change process is underway under this Government.  \nLet us now turn to the specific context of Mauritius. Mauritius has a unique history. A \nhistory shaped by slavery, by indentured labour, by colonial denial of justice to the majority \nof those who toiled for this country. \n\n121 \n \nThe right to justice was intrinsically linked to our social and political emancipation. \nWith independence, we enshrined civil and political rights in our Constitution. Though \nimmense progress has been achieved since then, we are a society that remains unjust towards \nthe lower classes and towards women. Legal assistance in practice has been costly. It has \nbeen reserved for an elite.  \nThough our Constitution and law recognise the rights of citizens to legal assistance, the \nthreshold has long been set to a mere Rs10,000. This threshold has excluded many. In \npractice, justice remained inaccessible for too many Mauritians. \nThe Legal Aid and Legal Assistance Bill before us today aims to address these deep-\nrooted injustices. Its object is clear: to repeal the existing legislation and to introduce a \nmodern framework that makes legal aid accessible to persons with low income who cannot \nafford legal representation.  \nThe Bill does several important things, which has been underlined by my colleagues. It \nincreases the income threshold from Rs10,000 to Rs20,000 on the methodology proposed and \ndescribed by the hon. Attorney General. It expands the list of offences for which legal aid is \navailable. It imposes new obligations on courts and Police Officers to inform citizens of their \nright to legal aid in a language they understand. It addresses existing shortcomings and \ncorrects longstanding anomalies.  \nFor instance, under the new framework, if a woman applies for legal aid, her \napplication will no longer be evaluated based on the family’s total income. The husband \nincome will no longer count against her. This is a major step towards injustice for women, \nparticularly in cases of domestic violence and matrimonial disputes. \nWe must emphasise this point: the overwhelming majority of legal aid applications \ntoday concern matrimonial matters. Women seeking divorce, custody, protection from abuse, \nneed the support of the State. The Bill answers that need. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me give some real-life realities. What would have \nhappened to someone from the lower rank of society, poor, without legal connection if they \nwere falsely accused, if they were victim of planting by the police under the previous regime? \nLet us remember my friend B. L., what would have happened to him without legal assistance, \nwithout being assisted by my colleague, hon. Shakeel Mohamed? Or what would have \nhappened to A. B., would he have survived the system if he had been poor and unable to \ndefend himself? What about the woman who killed her abusive husband in self-defence after \n\n122 \n \nyears of domestic violence? If she had no access to legal representation, would she have had \na fair trial? Would justice have been served? How many young men have been victims of \npolice brutality because they have no means to hire a lawyer? How many have died in police \ncustody? And let us not forget the many everyday cases, the nearby disputes, the inheritance \nissues, the workplace conflicts where the poor are left defenceless against the wealthy simply \nbecause they cannot afford a lawyer. \nLet us look at the numbers, the statistics from 2020 to 2023 show the following – \n(i) \nOn average during the four years in question, only one third of those who apply \nfor legal aid were granted assistance; \n(ii) \nOn average 92% of the application are for matrimonial cases; \n(iii) Though criminal cases are of prime importance for many citizens, application for \nlegal aid related to criminal case was a tiny proportion of legal aid applied for. \nFor the 4 years, 2020 to 2023, the proportion was 1.06 of the application of legal \naid; \n(iv) The number of requests for legal aid assistance peaked in the year 2020 with \n4,965 applications while in 2023, the number of applications dropped to 1,532.  \nFrom 2022 to 2023, the expenditure on legal aid increased by 66.6%, from Rs1.7 \nmillion to Rs2.7 million. This shows that despite the low threshold, the growing demand and \nthe State’s growing recognition of the importance of this service. The need is immense and \nthe current system is not meeting it. Legal aid is not a luxury. It is not a charity. It is justice; it \nis one of the pillars of the sovereign and democratic State. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Legal Aid and Legal Assistance Bill is a step forward. It is \na progressive measure, it is a necessary measure, it is a response to the to the cries of those \nwho have waited too long, suffered too much and been ignored too often. \nLet us remember the fundamental truth, non-access to justice is justice denied. This Bill \ngives a voice to the voiceless. It brings hope to the hopeless, it tells every citizen rich or poor, \nmen or women, that they are equal before the law. This is what justice looks like and with \nthese words, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I commend this Bill to the House. \n(6.22 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Housing and Lands (Mr S. Mohamed): Thank you, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir. I was sharing with the hon. Deputy Prime Minister a few minutes ago the \n\n123 \n \ndifficulty I find myself in is, after having listened to everyone on this very important piece of \nlegislation and the excellent speech pronounced by the hon. Minister of Social Security and \nthe others, I find myself with very less, because I do not want to repeat whatever they have \nsaid. \nHowever, just to pick up from where my honourable friend, the Minister of Social \nSecurity has left on. Everyone agrees that the whole idea of legal aid is indeed for the issue of \naccess to justice to be resolved. I have had the opportunity of reading the past legislations \nback in the 70s and I have had the pleasure of reading some of the excellent presentations \nmade by those who are no longer with us, for instance, hon. Ollivry and hon. d’Unienville in \nthose days. The interesting thing is that everything my learned friends from the Bar have said \nhere, including the Attorney General, and hon. Members have said, today, is exactly what \nthey were saying back in the 70s. In other words, it is a fundamental right, that of having \naccess to justice, that one should not curtail the access to justice, one should not put barriers \nto that access otherwise we would be defeating the purpose of access to justice. This is \nexactly what then hon. Guy Ollivry was saying in this House. I find it, as I say it again, \ninteresting that now we are in 2025 and we are saying the same thing. \nSo, somewhere, somehow, something has gone wrong. We have the habit in this \nRepublic of ours of having beautifully written laws but we also have the bad habit of not \nbeing able to enforce laws. So, when I read our Constitution and our Constitution says, at the \nvery start, and some people from the previous government failed to understand what exactly \nsection 1 of the Constitution means –  \n“Mauritius shall be a sovereign democratic State”. \nWhat is democracy? Democracy is not just the right to say something but democracy is \nwider than that and part of democracy is also the element of access to justice because if you \ndo not give proper access to justice, democracy is stifled. You are killing democracy. When I \ngo to section 10 of the Constitution, it is even more interesting because the framers of our \nConstitution – “Provisions to secure protection of law” at subsection (2)(c) – every person \nwho is charge with a criminal offence –  \n“(c) \nshall be given adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence;” \n But I do not stop there and the Constitution does not stop there, it goes further, \nsubsection 2(d) and this is where the subject of this debate, today, takes all is relevance \n\n124 \n \nbecause it finds its footing, its source, at section 10(2)(d) of the Constitution. It says every \nperson who is charged with a criminal offence – \n“(d) \nshall be permitted to defend himself in person or, at his own expense, by a legal \nrepresentative of his own choice or, where so prescribed, by a legal \nrepresentative provided at the public expense;” \n So, the whole idea of providing someone a lawyer to represent someone in a court of \nlaw at the public expense is there in our Constitution. Why do I stress on that, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir? It is because here, I speak to the nation and what I see in front of me, as other \nfriends have reminded us, two empty chairs!  \nHon. Members: Three! \nMr Mohamed: Oh yes, I say two because sometimes some people do not know where \nthey stand and very often they try to sit on the fence, and as I have always said, be careful \nwhen you sit on the fence, it will hurt physically. \nSo, we have those three empty spaces but not only are those seats empty and it is not \nthe first time that the Opposition chooses not to be present. They choose not to be present but \nhear me out, they believe by their absence that they have nothing to contribute to this piece of \nlegislation and what is this legislation talking about? It talks about providing help and we \nsimplify it, those who cannot afford justice – for those who cannot open the doors to a court \nof law, to hire the lawyer next to their side, or a solicitor or an attorney – that we give them \nthat possibility without any barriers. This is what the law is about. So, it addresses those who \ncannot afford it. \nIn other words, the poor, those on low income, those who need our help, those who \nneed our attention, those who need us to listen to what they are saying, and this is an example \nof how this Government is not only listening but through what the Attorney General and this \nGovernment has done, we have acted upon what we have heard. Not only listened but we \nhave acted upon what we have heard, and this is the result of the action; this piece of \nlegislation opening the doors to the Courts, to justice and not only leaving in our Constitution \nthe simple theory that what the Constitution says; you shall be able to obtain at the expense of \nthe public, the State a representative. But it does not leave it in our books, we turn it into \nreality. \nSo, today, when I see those empty seats, what it says to me is that they are not \ninterested. They are only interested in going out there and telling people ‘Well, this is what is \n\n125 \n \nbeing taken away from you’ but they are not interested, or they do not realise either out of \nincompetence or of sheer ignorance, choose it, left or right they lose. They are not even aware \nthat this is such an important piece of legislation that we are here putting into practice what is \nin theory provided for in our Constitution. This is a shame, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. So, now I \nwant people out there, through those words, through my words, through the words of all our \nfriends in this Assembly who have chosen to be present, to look at what those empty seats \nmean; that for them, the people who want access to justice, they mean nothing to the \nOpposition that should have been here but have chosen to be absent. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have had an interesting read of a document entitled ‘In \nMauritius, courts and police confront weakened public trust amid persistent perceptions of \ncorruption.’ This is Afrobarometer which is of 06 September 2024. The first page of the \ndocument, I quote from it, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it says – \n“Afrobarometer’s latest survey in Mauritius sheds light on public perceptions of the \njudiciary and police. Findings show that a mere one-fifth of Mauritians view the rulings \nof judges and magistrates as completely free from political interference.” \nAnd who was in power then? The empty seats! They have run away – \n“Two-thirds of citizens suspect that at least some judges and magistrates are involved in \ncorruption…” \nI am not saying it is true but this is the perception, a perception encouraged by a \ngovernment whose representatives today, in the Opposition, have chosen to run away but it is \nencouraged by a government that did nothing for access to justice for ten years whilst they \nwere in power. And what this study also shows, and it is interesting, the reading of the study, \nshows that people with low income are those who do not trust our justice system the most. \nThat is interesting. People with low income are those that do not trust our justice system the \nmost. In other words, when you do not open up the issue of accessibility to justice, when you \ndo not come up with legislations of this nature, when you do not do such a marvellous job as \nthe hon. Attorney General has done, that is when you encourage those who do not  have \nenough money to pay a lawyer or pay a solicitor, you encourage those people not to have \nconfidence in the judiciary.  \nAnd what I find interesting at page 11 of this report which is dated 6 September 2024 \nand I join what hon. Lobine has stated, and it says here at page 11 – \n\n126 \n \n“(…)  more than half (58%) of Mauritians say they are not aware of any legal aid \nservices in their community…” \nThis is serious. So, what is the point of having beautiful laws if you do not know that \nthis is what you have access to? So, yes, I agree and I am sure that the hon. Attorney General \nhas taken note and I am sure that those who will be responsible for the manning of the system \nwill take note of what has been said. We have to let them know that they have access to this. \nWe have to let them know that not only do they have access to this, we also have to let them \nknow that not only we participated in the process of giving them access to it but there are \ncertain people who chose not to participate. That also they have to know but I am not saying \nthat we have to put it on a flyer but then again, they have to know. So, what I find most \ninteresting and I would like here to quote a Judgement, that of A. S. Mamode v the Queen \n1991, Mauritius reports page 223. In that Judgment it says – \n“The concept of fair trial guaranteed by section 10 of the Constitution implies fair \nand impartial enquiries into the allegations of accused parties, the more so when as \nin the present case the accused is detained pending his trial.” \nIn other words, you cannot have a fair trial without a fair enquiry and how can you have \na fair enquiry, subsequently a fair trial if the person who is suspected of having committed an \noffense, I use that as an example, if he does not have access to legal advice and legal \nassistance at the time that he is being questioned as a suspect, how can he benefit from any \nfair trial if he is not taken care of from the very start?  \nSo, that is why, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is always easy to read a piece of legislation. \nIt is nice to be able to write it but then again to remove it from the Constitution, bring it into \nlegislation and to give it life for it to mean something to people who need that assistance, this \nis the whole beauty of our system and that is why it is a beautiful piece of legislation. That is \nwhy I congratulate the hon. Attorney General and his officers and all those who have helped \nin the drafting of this piece of legislation. Let me say this, I know for a fact many of us are \nlawyers here. Every single person who is a lawyer in this House – I must say including \nmyself – we do not wait. We have not waited for the legal aid system to function for us to \nrepresent people pro bono, including yourself, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. We do it but I think it \nis important not only that we continue doing it – let me say en passant that I miss the fact that \nI do not do it nowadays – but that we continue doing it. But I think that it is good now that we \nhave a structured system that is clearly a better system. \n\n127 \n \nThose are my words. Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Hon. Attorney General! \n(6.36 p.m.) \nMr Glover: I will certainly not start blowing my own trumpet by saying that it is \nbeautiful Bill. I am glad to see the support of the House to this Bill which as I have said \nearlier, is one of the most important I have brought to this House to date. One must \nunderstand how the legal aid application or system works. It is a decentralised system, that is, \nat the Supreme Court you have a Legal Aid Unit which is headed by the Senior Puisne Judge, \nthe number 2 of our justice system. Then at the Intermediate Court, the Industrial Court and \nDistrict Courts, the presiding Magistrates of these Courts are the ones who actually deal with \napplications. They see these applications day in day out and I think we should trust this \ndecentralised system for the time being in order to see how this Act will work in practice.  \nThere is no doubt that there will be a necessity to empower the legal aid units at all \nlevels in order for them to be able to process these applications so that the system is not \nclogged by the number of applications which will inevitably go up. Let me reassure the \nHouse, the swift processing of applications will be a priority. The expeditious necessity for a \nquick decision, especially needed in criminal matters when a citizen needs advice whilst in \ndetention or if his interrogation might lead to his arrest, this answers the question of the hon. \nMember of Rivière du Rempart regarding legal advice. \nThis is covered, I must say, by the legal assistance proviso in Clause 10 (1) of the Bill. \nSo, there will be a need to expedite matters, and, of course, to empower the legal aid units in \nall the court rooms. \nNow, I also agree that there is a need to have an overarching enactment in order to give \nmore, how can I put it, “oomph” to this legislation. The long-awaited Police and Criminal \nJustice Bill is not just a dream, as some might think. It is real. There is a draft ready and it \nwill be brought before this House within a few months, just like the National Crime Agency \nBill. These pieces of legislation are important to this Government and they will be brought \nbefore this House very soon. In the meantime, we should continue to bring forward litigation \nthat will clarify processes, rationalise them, and in so doing, increase access to justice.  \nI take good note of the proposition to review the Public Officers Protection Act. Let me \nreassure the hon. Member that I am on the same wavelength as he is.  \n\n128 \n \nFrom day one, it has been my aim, and I hope to be able to fulfil this goal, to actually \nshape the system so that every citizen of this land feels that he has or she has been taken care \nof and that he or she has not been left behind because of lack of means.  \nAs the Explanatory Memorandum to the Act states, it is a modern legislation with a \nview to making it more accessible for persons with low income and who cannot afford legal \nrepresentation, to have access to justice in civil and criminal proceedings before any court. It \nimposes certain obligations on courts and Police Officers to inform citizens of their rights, \nand, as you have all stated, it clearly also addresses shortcomings in the law with regard to \nlegal aid and legal assistance. \nWith these words, I commend this Bill to the House. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nBill read a second time and committed. \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(The Deputy Speaker in the Chair) \nTHE LEGAL AID AND LEGAL ASSISTANCE BILL  \n(No. XIII of 2025) \nThe Legal Aid and Legal Assistance Bill (No. XIII of 2025) was considered and agreed \nto. \nOn the Assembly resuming with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair, the Deputy Speaker \nreported accordingly. \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Legal Aid and Legal Assistance Bill (No. XIII of \n2025) was read the third time and passed. \n \n \n\n129 \n \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister! \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I beg to move that this Assembly do \nnow adjourn to Tuesday 15 July 2025 at 11.30 a.m. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The House stands adjourned! \nAt 6.44 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 15 July 2025 at \n11.30 a.m. \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nTORY CROWN LAND – RIVER BANKS & BRIDGES REHABILITATION \n(No. A/1) Dr.  F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the lands located \nin the vicinity of the Tory Crown Land, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to where matters stand regarding the proposed raising of the banks thereat and \nreconstruction of bridges along same. \nReply: I have to inform the House that the National Development Unit launched two \nbidding exercises in 2022 for the construction of storm drains and provision of retaining walls \nat Nazareth, Tranquebar. However, due to the unresponsiveness of bids, the exercises were \ncancelled. Subsequently, the project was allocated to the Drains Infrastructure Construction \nLtd, in November 2022, for its implementation. \nThe Drains Infrastructure Construction Ltd appointed a consultant for the preparation of \nbidding documents and for supervision of works. Bids were invited for the appointment of a \ncontractor in April 2024 and financial clearance was sought from the Ministry of Finance. On \n16 June 2025, since the Ministry of Finance has requested that the bidding process be \ncancelled, a new bidding exercise will be carried out based on a revised cost estimate in this \nfinancial year. \nRegarding the reconstruction of bridges, the National Development Unit appointed a \nconsultant to carry out a study and assess the hydraulic capacity of the bridges located along \n\n130 \n \nRuisseau du Pouce. A Preliminary Design Report has been submitted by the consultant on 23 \nJune 2025 and approval of Land Drainage Authority has been sought accordingly. \nRIVULET ST LOUIS RESERVE, PAILLES – POULTRY PEN – ACTIONS \n(No. A/2) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port- Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the poultry pen found \non the reserve of Rivulet St Louis at Cardinal Avenue, Morcellement Raffray, Guibies, \nPailles, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Municipal City Council of Port \nLouis, information as to whether actions have been initiated on the request of the Forestry \nService in relation thereto. \nReply: In 2005, the Forestry Services of the then Ministry Agro-Industry and Food \nSecurity prosecuted one Mr M.B.W. for having undertaken an illegal construction of a \nboundary wall retaining wall and a concrete building at ground floor along the Rivulet St \nLouis River Reserve, which is causing obstruction of the watercourse. These constructions \ndate back to 2005. The Municipal City Council of Port Louis (MCCPL) has informed that the \nbuilding houses a poultry pen.  \nIn view of the fact that river reserves fall under the portfolio of the Agro-Industry, Food \nSecurity, Blue Economy and Fisheries, the MCCPL has informed that it has no locus standi \nin this matter.  \nIn 2005, the Forestry Services of the then Ministry of Agro-Industry and Food Security \nprosecuted the owner of the premises before the District Court of Moka. The Court ordered \nthe demolition of the illegal development within a period of one year, and the owner was \nordered to pay a fine of Rs 2,000. \nHowever, the owner did not comply with the Court Order, and in 2009, the latter was \nagain prosecuted. The Court ordered him to pull down the illegal construction and to pay a \nfine of Rs 3,000. \nIn 2012, he was ordered by Court to pay Rs 3,000 for still not having complied to the \nCourt Order.  \n\n131 \n \nOn 13 December 2024, the then Senior Chief Executive of the Ministry of Local \nGovernment effected a site visit at the Morcellement Raffray and it was found that the illegal \nstructure was still encroaching on the river reserve across some 5 metres. \nFollowing a meeting held at the Ministry of Local Government on 16 December 2024, \nunder the chairpersonship of the then Senior Chief Executive, it was recommended that the \nmatter be referred to the Forestry Department to seek the advice of the Attorney General’s \nOffice (AGO) due to the fact that the development was made on the reserve of the Rivulet St \nLouis with an encroachment of some 5 metres.  \nI am informed that on the 12 February 2025, the Forestry Department informed this \nMinistry that it had already submitted all the relevant documents to the AGO.  \nMy Ministry has sent an email to the Forestry Department with respect to the \naforementioned matter and a status update is awaited.  \nADVISERS/SENIOR ADVISERS – MONTHLY ALLOWANCE, GRATUITY \n& BENEFITS – QUANTUM",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/626",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 626,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/626) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nLand Transport whether, in regard the online Motor Vehicle Licence Platform, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information as \nto whether same is currently available to residents of Rodrigues and, if so, indicate the \nservices available through same.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the National Land Transport Authority (NLTA) that there are \ncurrently 22,514 Motor Vehicle Licence (MVL)Tax payers in Rodrigues which include 21, \n838 owners of private vehicles and 676 Public Service Vehicle licensees. \nPreviously, MVLs were being renewed at the three counters at the NLTA Rodrigues \nOffice at Baie Lascar, Port Mathurin and the five post offices which are located at Port \nMathurin, Mont Lubin, La Ferme, Grand Montagne and Rivière Coco. \n\n140 \n \nHowever, since 20 September 2024, the Online MVL platform has been introduced in \nRodrigues whereby the residents can avail from the same online facilities as those provided in \nMauritius, namely – \nI. \nrenewal of Motor Vehicle Licence (MVL - commonly known as “Déclaration”) \nby owners of private vehicles, and \nII. \nrenewal of both MVL and Public Service Vehicle Licence (PSVL also commonly \nknown as “Patente”) by holders of PSVL. \n \nIt is to be highlighted that the initial online MVL platform has had a meagre uptake in \nRodrigues such that only 21 users thereat (representing less than 1%) have renewed their \nMVL online since its introduction on 20 September 2024 up to end of May 2025 implying \nthat most MVLs are still being renewed at the NLTA Rodrigues Office and Post Offices. \nSurprisingly, since the launching of the enhanced Online MVL platform on 03 June this \nyear, both in Mauritius and Rodrigues, only two online transactions have been carried on the \nsaid platform in Rodrigues.  \nThis Government has always favoured a very inclusive approach in policy making and \nimplementation. Accordingly, my Ministry has already started working on several strategic \nareas which need to be strengthened in Rodrigues with a view to ensuring coherence in the \npolicies and facilities provided to the citizens of Rodrigues. To that effect, a visit to \nRodrigues in the very near future is also being contemplated and a hotline facility service will \nsoon be put in place to assist users. This will be accompanied by a sensitisation campaign. \nAs regards the Online MVL system, my Ministry will work closely with the NLTA \nOffice in Rodrigues and other stakeholders in order to take prompt remedial actions that will \nassist in boosting the uptake of this platform in the best interest of the citizens of Rodrigues. \n \nPALMA DISPENSARY – PROPOSED RENOVATION/RELOCATION \n(No. B627) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the dispensary at Palma, he \nwill state if consideration will be given for the renovation or relocation thereof and, if so, \nindicate when, giving details thereof and, if not, why not. \n(Withdrawn) \nGLYPHOSATE & GLYPHOSATE-BASED HERBICIDES – PROPOSED BANNING \n\n141",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/627",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 627,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "To ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness – \n \nWhether, in regard to the dispensary at Palma, he will state if \nconsideration will be given for the renovation or relocation \nthereof and, if so, indicate when, giving details thereof and, if \nnot, why not?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/628",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 628,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/628) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides, he will state if consideration will be \ngiven for the banning thereof in Mauritius in the light of the scientific evidence established \nby the global research led by the Ramazzini Institute (June 2025) linking the use thereof and \nthe carcinogenic effects of exposure thereto at levels previously deemed safe by EU \nstandards.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \n \n \nMORCELLEMENT ST ANDRÉ FOOTBALL GROUND – UPGRADING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/629",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 629,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/629) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Morcellement St André Football \nGround, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the – \n(a) \nquantum of funds allocated for the upgrading thereof, more specifically for the \nlighting and fencing thereof, and \n(b) \nexpected start and completion dates thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nSMALL SUGARCANE PLANTERS – SUPPORT MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/630",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 630,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/630) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the small sugarcane planters, he will state the measures being taken to secure – \n(a) \nadequate labour availability for the cultivation and harvesting of the fields \nthereof; \n(b) \navailability thereto of mechanised solutions to address labour shortage; \n(c) \nimproved targeted financial assistance, subsidies or credit schemes to support \nmechanisation and improve overall productivity and viability thereof, and \n(d) \nimportation of labour with other Ministries.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n\n142 \n \n \nCOTTAGE-POUDRE D'OR HAMLET ROAD – ROAD SAFETY MEASURES – \nROAD WIDENING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/631",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 631,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/631) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the road from Cottage to Poudre \nd'Or Hamlet, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Road Development \nAuthority, information as to whether consideration will be given for the implementation of \nroad safety measures thereat, including the – \n (a)  installation of pavements and handrails through compulsory acquisition of lands \nalong the main roads to ensure pedestrian security, and  \n(b) \nwidening thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n14TH MONTH BONUS 2025 – RETIREES/PENSIONERS – ELIGIBILITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/632",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 632,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/632) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nLabour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to the payment of the 14th Month’ Bonus \n2025, he will state the number of retirees/pensioners having reportedly not received same as \nat to date, indicating if certain categories thereof are not eligible thereto and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Reply: I wish to refer the hon. Member to my reply to PQ B/310 at our Sitting of 08 \nApril 2025, whereby, I informed the House that, in December 2024, Government introduced \na Special Allowance (14th month bonus) for some 420,200 employees from both the private \nand public sectors as well as a one-month allowance to every pensioner, widow, orphan and \ndisabled person in Mauritius. This applies to individuals who draw a basic wage salary at a \nrate not exceeding Rs50,000 monthly. \nThe Special Allowance is equivalent to one-month basic wage or salary for employees \nwho have been in continuous employment for the whole of the year 2024 or is pro-rated for \nthose who were in continuous employment for only part of the year 2024, including those \nwho retired during the course of year 2024. \nAs at end of August 2025, my Ministry has received representations concerning non-\npayment of Special Allowance from retired employees relating to five organisations, namely, \nMauritius Post Ltd, Cargo Handling Corporation Ltd, Airports of Mauritius Ltd, Central \nElectricity Board and Mauritius Cane Industry Authority. \nIn all the above cases, the employees had retired prior to year 2024 and accordingly, \nwere not eligible for the Special Allowance 2024, as per the provisions of the Special \nAllowance Act 2024. \n\n143 \n \nThe State Law Office which was consulted on the matter has highlighted that – \na) \nGovernment’s decision of 13 December 2024 refers only to the payment of a \n14th month bonus to beneficiaries of basic pensions and public pensioners, and \nb) \non 19 December 2024, the Ministry of Finance has issued a Circular which \nprovided for the modalities and arrangements for the payment of 14th month \nbonus for year 2024 to public officers, local government officers, officers of the \nRodrigues Regional Assembly and employees of statutory bodies whose terms \nand conditions are governed by the Pay Research Bureau.  \nThe State Law Office has thus opined that as the law currently stands there is no legal \nrequirement for the payment of the Special Allowance to the pensioners of the aforesaid \nentities. \nWith regard to complaints received at the Inspection and Enforcement Section in the \ndifferent Labour Offices, I am informed that 26 individual cases were received for non-\npayment of the Special Allowance 2024 to eligible employees who retired during the year \n2024 out of which – \na) \n22 cases were settled and an amount of Rs271,275.34 was paid; \nb) \none case was rejected because the complainant failed to turn up; \nc) \nof the two cases where the employer has refused to settle the Special Allowance, \none case has been referred to the Industrial Court by way of a Plaint and the \ncase is coming Pro Forma on 16 October 2025 and the other case has been \nreferred to Chambers and the Pro Forma date is yet to be communicated to my \nMinistry, and \nd) \nin one case, parties have agreed for payment in instalments and the last \ninstalment will be paid by the end of September 2025. \n \nROCHE BOIS WASTE TRANSFER STATION – RELOCATION PROJECT– \nCOMPULSORY LAND ACQUISITION AT BAIE DU TOMBEAU",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/633",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 633,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/633) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet ) asked \nthe Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the land situated around the Waste \nWater Treatment Plant at Baie du Tombeau, he will state the reasons why his Ministry is \npursuing the compulsory acquisition thereof for the proposed relocation of the Waste \nTransfer Station of Roche Bois thereat when the Ministry of Environment has not prepared \nand Government has not approved any such project.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n\n144 \n \n \nDIVING CENTRE ACCIDENT – INQUIRY – REMEDIAL ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/634",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 634,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. B/634) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Tourism whether, in regard to the recent accident that occurred in a \ndiving centre in the north of the island, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to – \n(a) \nwhether an inquiry has been carried out thereinto and the outcome thereof;  \n(b) \nremedial actions taken, if any, in relation to the suspected cause thereof, \n and \n(c) \nthe measures taken, if any, to accompany family members of the victim thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPUBLIC PLACES – RAT INFESTATION – URGENT REMEDIAL MEASURES & \nCONTRACTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/635",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 635,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/635) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the public places, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Health Services, information as to \nwhether rat infestation has been observed thereat and, if so, indicate if urgent remedial \nmeasures will be taken in relation thereto, including if consideration will be given for the \ncontracting out of the services to private rodent control service providers.",
      "answer": "Reply: The issue regarding rat infestation in public places falls under the purview of \nother national agencies such as the Ministry of Local Government and Ministry of \nEnvironment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change. These Ministries make their \nown arrangements for rodent control through the appointment of specialised private service \nproviders. \nHowever, the Rodent Control Unit (RCU) of my Ministry performs regular rodent \ncontrol activities in all public health institutions, namely all Government Hospitals, \nMediclinics, Area Health Centres, Community Health Centres, Medical Stores, Vagrant \nDepot and various offices of my Ministry, as well as, other Government institutions, such as, \nthe Prime Minister’s Office in case of any complaints received. The Unit also carries out \ninterventions on private premises where Leptospirosis cases have been notified. \nFrom 2019 to May 2025 – \n(i) \nthe RCU has conducted 54,325 visits; \n\n145 \n \n(ii) \n25,411 rats have been caught and killed, and \n(iii) 45,150 sensitisation programmes on rodent control for the public have been \ncarried out by the Unit. \nRODRIGUES – NEW SPORTS BILL – COMITÉ RÉGIONAL OLYMPIQUE ET \nSPORTIF",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/636",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 636,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/636) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nYouth and Sports whether, in regard to the proposed introduction of a new administrative \nframework and a new Sports Bill, he will state where matters stand, indicating if – \n(a) \nprior consultations have been or will be held with Rodrigues sports communities, \nand \n(b) \nGovernment is agreeable to the setting up of a special committee to make \nrecommendations on the setting up and missions of a Comité Régional Olympique \net Sportif (CROS) for Rodrigues and, if so, when.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nSSR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – BYPASS ROAD – UPGRADING & \nEMBELLISHMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/637",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 637,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/637) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the new bypass road \nleading to the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Road Development Authority, information as to whether \nconsideration will be given for the – \n(a) \nupgrading and embellishing of the roundabouts and motorway along same, and \n(b) \nreview of the existing and installation of new directional road traffic signs and \nstreet lighting thereat.",
      "answer": "Reply: The House may recall that in 2017, the Road Development Authority (RDA) \nimplemented the New Airport Access Road, which the hon. Member is referring to as the \nnew bypass road leading to the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport. However, \nit is only now after I assumed office, that an agreement has been finalised and duly signed for \nthe transfer of lands on which the road had been constructed.  \n\n146 \n \nThose lands belong mostly to Omnicane Ltd and, partly, to some ten private land \nowners. With the signature of the agreement, the private land owners will now be provided \nagricultural land at the ratio of 1:1.25, that is, for a portion of land of an extent of 1m2 \ntransferred to Government, Omnicane will transfer an extent of 1.25m2 of land to them. \n \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that, along this road, there are \nfive roundabouts which are all being maintained by private companies namely – \n(i) \nSir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport roundabout – embellished \nand maintained by Airports of Mauritius Co. Ltd; \n(ii) \nMon Trésor roundabout – embellished and maintained by Omnicane Limited; \n(iii) \nDes Places roundabout – embellished and maintained by Omnicane Limited; \n(iv) \nUnion Vale roundabout – embellished and maintained by Omnicane Limited, \nand \n(v) \nMare D'Albert roundabout – embellished and maintained by Aegle Onco Care \nCentre Ltd. \nI am also informed by the RDA that it ensures regular inspection of the road and is \nsatisfied that these roundabouts are being maintained properly. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed by the RDA that it has carried out \na survey along the road to identify faded or deficient directional road traffic signs. \nAccordingly, eight traffic signs have been replaced in June 2025 and eight are being \nmanufactured to be replaced by end of this month. This will ensure a better visibility of the \nsigns as well as better directional guidance. \nAs regards street lighting, I would like to refer the hon. Member to my reply of 18 \nMarch 2025 wherein I informed the House that the provision and maintenance of all street \nlighting found along Motorways M1, M2 and M3, including the new road leading to the Sir \nSeewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport, fall under the purview of the Local \nAuthorities and the Central Electricity Board (CEB).  \nI am also given to understand from the District Council of Grand Port that it is liaising \nwith its parent Ministry, for the handing over of the street lighting network, along that stretch, \nto the CEB. \nHIGHER EDUCATION – INTERNATIONALISATION – IMPLEMENTATION \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/638",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 638,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research",
      "question": "(No. B/638) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research whether, in regard to the \n\n147 \n \nimplementation of the internationalisation of higher education, he will state the measures \nhitherto taken, as outlined in the Government Programme 2025-2029.",
      "answer": "Reply: In line with Government’s vision, as stated in the Government programme \n2025-2029, to position Mauritius as a globally competitive and vibrant higher education hub, \nmy Ministry, in collaboration with the different institutions operating under its aegis, has \ninitiated numerous actions in the areas focused on science, research, innovation and higher \neducation. \nAt the centre of these actions is the setting up of the National Committee on \nInternationalisation of Higher Education, National Committee of Branding and Marketing of \nHigher Education, and the “Study-in-Mauritius” Committee. These committees have \npresented their findings at the Higher Education Summit which was held from 04 to 06 June. \nEach committee comprised several experts with the mandate of recommending a set of \nstrategies to successfully implement the internationalisation of our higher education sector \nunder the “Study in Mauritius” banner. \nThe Committees are actively developing a roadmap to attract international students \nfrom key regions. This also includes reviewing and proposing amendments to visa and work \npermit policies, simplifying application processes, and introducing a post-study work visa \nframework to retain talent. \nSecondly, taking into consideration the importance of students’ well-being and \nintegration, the Committees are also working on guidelines for language support, cultural \nadaptation, access to health services, student orientation, and housing standards tailored to \ninternational needs. \nThirdly, our strategy includes promoting transnational education through joint degrees, \nacademic exchanges, and virtual mobility programmes. The Committee is further exploring \npartnerships with globally reputed institutions to co-organise conclaves of university leaders, \nresearch collaboration platforms, and international academic festivals in Mauritius. \nTo facilitate the internationalisation process and position as a preferred destination for \nthe higher education sector, a strategic collaboration has been established between the Higher \nEducation Commission and the Quality Assurance Agency of the United Kingdom in May of \nthis year. This collaboration will lead to a streamlined accreditation process within the \nMauritian higher education jurisdiction, as programmes which have already been quality \nassured by QAA-UK will be subject to a streamlined accreditation process by HEC. This will \nbe instrumental in positioning Mauritius as a credible, quality-driven educational hub. \n\n148 \n \nWe are also encouraging our higher education institutions to foster international \npartnerships, not as a symbolic gesture, but as a meaningful collaboration that enhances \ninstitutional quality, research output, and global relevance. \nAll these measures converge towards developing the higher education sector as a key \neconomic pillar and transforming Mauritius into a beacon of academic and research \nexcellence. \nMFA SEMI-FINAL MATCH – CERCLE DE JOACHIM vs LA CURE WAVES – \nCHANGE OF VENUE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/639",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 639,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/639) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the change of venue for the holding of \nthe football semi-final match of the Mauritius Football Association (MFA) Cup between \nCercle de Joachim and La Cure Waves on Wednesday 25 June 2025 from the stadium found \nat the Côte d’Or National Sports Complex to the St François Xavier Stadium, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the MFA, information as to the reasons therefor.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Mauritius Football Association (MFA) that the semi-final \nof the MFA Cup 2025 between Cercle de Joachim Curepipe Club Sportif and La Cure Waves \nS.C. was initially scheduled to be played on Sunday 22 June 2025 at Auguste Vollaire \nStadium and the final on Saturday 28 June 2025 at the Côte d’Or National Sports Complex. \nI am further informed by the MFA that the final of the Republic Cup 2025 was \nscheduled on Wednesday 25 June 2025 at Côte d’Or National Sports Complex. \nThe MFA has informed that its National Managing Committee met on 16 June 2025 \nand decided that a final such as the Republic Cup must be organised during a weekend \ninstead of a weekday. Since the final of the MFA Cup was already scheduled for Saturday 28 \nJune 2025 and that La Cure Waves S.C. could also be qualified for the MFA Cup Final, the \nMFA opted for the weekend 21 to 22 June 2025. \nI am informed that it was in this context that the National Managing Committee of the \nMFA decided to play the final of the Republic Cup on Sunday, 22 June 2025 at Auguste \nVollaire Stadium and the semi-final of the MFA Cup on 25 June 2025 at Côte d’Or National \nSports Complex. However, the MFA’s request to play the semi-final of the MFA Cup at Côte \n\n149 \n \nd’Or National Sports Complex on Wednesday, 25 June 2025 was turned down by the \nMauritius Multisports Infrastructure Ltd. as they had approved only for finals to be played. \nAccordingly, I am informed by the MFA that St. Francois Xavier stadium was the only \nalternative stadium with lighting that could host this semi-final on a weekday. \nST MARTIN DAM LEISURE PARK PROJECT – CONTRACTOR/S – MATERIALS \nSUPPLY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/640",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 640,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/640) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the St Martin Dam Leisure \nPark Project in Quartier Militaire, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nDistrict Council of Moka, information as to – \n(a) \nthe names of the contractor/s involved therein, indicating the quantum of funds \npaid to each in respect of works carried out, and \n(b) \nif the District Council supplied materials therefor and, if so, give details \nthereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "A/1",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 1,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. A/1) Dr.  F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the lands located \nin the vicinity of the Tory Crown Land, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to where matters stand regarding the proposed raising of the banks thereat and \nreconstruction of bridges along same.",
      "answer": "Reply: I have to inform the House that the National Development Unit launched two \nbidding exercises in 2022 for the construction of storm drains and provision of retaining walls \nat Nazareth, Tranquebar. However, due to the unresponsiveness of bids, the exercises were \ncancelled. Subsequently, the project was allocated to the Drains Infrastructure Construction \nLtd, in November 2022, for its implementation. \nThe Drains Infrastructure Construction Ltd appointed a consultant for the preparation of \nbidding documents and for supervision of works. Bids were invited for the appointment of a \ncontractor in April 2024 and financial clearance was sought from the Ministry of Finance. On \n16 June 2025, since the Ministry of Finance has requested that the bidding process be \ncancelled, a new bidding exercise will be carried out based on a revised cost estimate in this \nfinancial year. \nRegarding the reconstruction of bridges, the National Development Unit appointed a \nconsultant to carry out a study and assess the hydraulic capacity of the bridges located along \n\n130 \n \nRuisseau du Pouce. A Preliminary Design Report has been submitted by the consultant on 23 \nJune 2025 and approval of Land Drainage Authority has been sought accordingly. \nRIVULET ST LOUIS RESERVE, PAILLES – POULTRY PEN – ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "A/2",
      "sitting_id": "08-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-08",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 2,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. A/2) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port- Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the poultry pen found \non the reserve of Rivulet St Louis at Cardinal Avenue, Morcellement Raffray, Guibies, \nPailles, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Municipal City Council of Port \nLouis, information as to whether actions have been initiated on the request of the Forestry \nService in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Reply: In 2005, the Forestry Services of the then Ministry Agro-Industry and Food \nSecurity prosecuted one Mr M.B.W. for having undertaken an illegal construction of a \nboundary wall retaining wall and a concrete building at ground floor along the Rivulet St \nLouis River Reserve, which is causing obstruction of the watercourse. These constructions \ndate back to 2005. The Municipal City Council of Port Louis (MCCPL) has informed that the \nbuilding houses a poultry pen.  \nIn view of the fact that river reserves fall under the portfolio of the Agro-Industry, Food \nSecurity, Blue Economy and Fisheries, the MCCPL has informed that it has no locus standi \nin this matter.  \nIn 2005, the Forestry Services of the then Ministry of Agro-Industry and Food Security \nprosecuted the owner of the premises before the District Court of Moka. The Court ordered \nthe demolition of the illegal development within a period of one year, and the owner was \nordered to pay a fine of Rs 2,000. \nHowever, the owner did not comply with the Court Order, and in 2009, the latter was \nagain prosecuted. The Court ordered him to pull down the illegal construction and to pay a \nfine of Rs 3,000. \nIn 2012, he was ordered by Court to pay Rs 3,000 for still not having complied to the \nCourt Order.  \n\n131 \n \nOn 13 December 2024, the then Senior Chief Executive of the Ministry of Local \nGovernment effected a site visit at the Morcellement Raffray and it was found that the illegal \nstructure was still encroaching on the river reserve across some 5 metres. \nFollowing a meeting held at the Ministry of Local Government on 16 December 2024, \nunder the chairpersonship of the then Senior Chief Executive, it was recommended that the \nmatter be referred to the Forestry Department to seek the advice of the Attorney General’s \nOffice (AGO) due to the fact that the development was made on the reserve of the Rivulet St \nLouis with an encroachment of some 5 metres.  \nI am informed that on the 12 February 2025, the Forestry Department informed this \nMinistry that it had already submitted all the relevant documents to the AGO.  \nMy Ministry has sent an email to the Forestry Department with respect to the \naforementioned matter and a status update is awaited.  \nADVISERS/SENIOR ADVISERS – MONTHLY ALLOWANCE, GRATUITY \n& BENEFITS – QUANTUM \n(No. B/585) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the monthly allowance, gratuity and other benefits to which Advisers and Senior \nAdvisers are entitled, he will state whether same have recently been revised, and, if so, \nindicate the – \n(a) \nquantum thereof, whether in cash or in kind, and \n(b) \neffective date thereof. \nReply: I wish to refer the hon. Member to the statement I made in the House on \nWednesday 25 June 2025 on the salaries payable to Advisers. \nAs I stated, with a view to rationalising the monthly allowances payable to Advisers, \nmy Government has categorised advisers into five categories, namely – \n(i) \nSenior Adviser (Technical); \n(ii) \nSenior Adviser; \n\n132 \n \n(iii) \nAdviser; \n(iv) \nAdviser on Information Matters, and \n(v) \nAdviser on Public Relations Matters. \nAs I said, Government also wants to be transparent in respect to the different scales of \nsalaries applicable to Advisers. We do not want to leave it to the discretion of whoever comes \nto power to decide on his own personal volition, his personal wishes, how much of public \nmoney should be spent on people who have been recruited by them. \nAs such, with the new grading and pay structure, all persons enlisted in a particular \ncategory would now draw the same pay package, contrary to past practice under the previous \ngovernment. \nIn regard to part (a) of the question, the quantum now in force are – \n \nSSR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – ADDITIONAL PARKING SLOTS – \nDIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE \n(No. B/586) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Sir \nSeewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom Airport Terminal Operations Ltd., information as to whether consideration will be given \nfor the provision thereat of – \n(a) \nadditional parking slots, roads and exit gates, and \n(b) \nadequate directional signage on the parking areas of the Old Terminal, \nindicating the current use made thereof and if same will be operational anew \nand, if so, when, giving details thereof. \n(Withdrawn) \nS/N \nCategory \nQuantum \n(i)  \nSenior Adviser (Technical) \nRs  100,000 \n(ii)  \nSenior Adviser \nRs    90,000 \n(iii) \nAdviser \nRs   70,000 \n(iv) \nAdviser on Information Matters \nRs    66,200 \n(v)  \nAdviser on Public Relations Matters \nRs   60,000 \n\n133 \n \nHOMICIDE & VIOLENT DEATH – REPORTED CASES – PERIOD NOV 2024-\nJUNE 2025 \n(No. B/587) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to homicide and violent death, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the number of reported cases thereof since \nNovember 2024 to date, indicating the – \n(a) \nnumber thereof in which arrests were effected; \n(b) \nnumber of suspects formally charged, and \n(c) \nmeasures envisaged to address the issue and reduce the occurrence thereof. \nReply: The terms “homicide” and “violent-death,” as referred to by the hon. Member, \nare offences which are categorised as murder, manslaughter, murder of a newly born child, \ncastration causing death, assault with premeditation causing death and assault upon father or \nmother with aggravating circumstances causing death in the Criminal Code. \nWith regard to parts (a) and (b) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of \nPolice that from November 2024 to 04 July 2025, 24 cases of murder and 1 case of \nmanslaughter were reported to the Police.  46 persons were arrested in connection with these \ncases, out of which, 45 persons were provisionally charged for murder and 1 for \nmanslaughter. \nAs regards part (c) of the question, I am further informed that since this Government \ntook office, several measures have been put in place by the Mauritius Police Force as part of \nan integrated approach to reduce the occurrence of such crimes.  These include inter alia – \n(i) \nThe adoption of a risk-based approach by regularly visiting elderly and \nvulnerable persons to ensure their security and aggressive sensitisation \ncampaigns across the island focused on safety, security, and crime prevention \nby the Crime Prevention Unit and the Brigade pour la Protection de la Famille; \n(ii) \nThe establishment of a dedicated Homicide Review Committee by the Brigade \npour la Protection de la Famille to study crime trends and identify root causes, \nespecially in cases of femicide and domestic violence-related deaths as well as \nthe increasing use of SafeCity Cameras for crime detection, and \n(iii) \nThe enlistment of a retired officer with extensive expertise in homicide \ninvestigations to guide and support Enquiring Officers in criminal investigation. \n\n134 \n \nThese actions are part of our broader national strategy to ensure the safety and security \nof all citizens, and these are already giving results with a 12% decrease in the crime rate \ncompared to the same period last year. \nMoreover, as I have already stated in the House on Thursday 19 June 2025, that several \nreforms are being brought in the Mauritius Police Force, and new technological equipment \nare being purchased for the Police to maintain law and order. These reforms reflect the \nGovernment’s clear commitment to ensuring the safety of every citizen, with special attention \nto the elderly, who are among the most vulnerable in our society. \nMy Government has always ensured that our institutions are equipped with the \nnecessary tools and resources to carry out their duties diligently and without interference. \n \nCOCAINE SEIZURE (95 KG) – INTERPOL ASSISTANCE – COCAINE STORAGE  \n(No. B/588) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the 95 kg of \ncocaine worth Rs 1.4 billion seized in a backhoe loader on 04 July 2019, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to where \nmatters stand regarding the inquiry initiated thereinto, indicating whether the – \n(a) \nassistance of Interpol is envisaged in relation thereto, and \n(b) \ncocaine is in the possession of the Police and, if so, further indicate whether – \n(i) \nall the 95 kg is stored and where, and \n(ii) \nregular monitoring thereof is carried out. \n(Withdrawn) \n \nMRS S.O., ATTORNEY AT LAW – FEES & ALLOWANCES & FRINGE BENEFITS \n(No. B/589) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Mrs S.O., Attorney at Law, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information \nas to the total quantum of fees and allowances paid out thereto, together with the other fringe \nbenefits to which she was entitled, over the period 2015 to 2024 in her capacity as legal \nrepresentative, chairperson, board member and for any other legal services rendered to the \ndifferent Ministries and parastatal bodies. \n\n135 \n \n(Withdrawn) \n \nRODRIGUES REGIONAL ASSEMBLY – PUBLIC FUNDS MANAGEMENT – \nTRANSPARENCY& ACCOUNTABILITY \n(No. B/590) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Accounts of the \nRodrigues Regional Assembly, he will state – \n(a)  the measures and remedial actions, if any, taken to strengthen the governance and \nmanagement of public funds for budget transparency, accountability and \ncredibility thereof, and  \n(b)  whether new guidelines have been issued for the reallocation and virement of \nfunds, as recommended in the Fourth Report of the Public Accounts Committee \nof the Seventh National Assembly and, if so, give details thereof and, if not, why \nnot. \n(Withdrawn) \n \nREWARD MONEY – QUANTUM ALLOCATED – CHECK & BALANCE \nMECHANISM \n(No. B/591) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to reward money, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to \nthe – \n(a)  quantum thereof allocated to Police Officers over each of the past five financial \nyears;  \n(b)  procedures followed therefor, and  \n(c)  check and balance mechanism put in place to prevent abuse and illicit use thereof. \n(Withdrawn) \n \nBANK CHEQUES – PROPOSED PHASE OUT \n(No. B/592) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \n\n136 \n \nregard to the use of bank cheques as means of payment, he will state if consideration will be \ngiven for the phasing out thereof and, if so, when and, if not, why not. \nReply: I am informed that as part of the modernisation and digitalisation of the \ndomestic banking and payment services sector, the Bank of Mauritius is adopting a strategy \nfor promoting digital payments in Mauritius. Digital banking is becoming more prominent \neverywhere. \nDespite the rise of digital banking, cheques are still a crucial part of the banking \nindustry and is an option still widely in use. \nHowever, the switch to digital payments will go concurrently and is expected to yield \nmore transparency, allowing for conducive lending to different sectors in the economy.  \n \nPORT MATHURIN POST OFFICE – CUSTOMS UNIT – DRUG DETECTION  \n(No. B/593) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the fight against \nproliferation of drugs through loose parcel in Rodrigues through the Port Mathurin Post \nOffice by Customs, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n (a) where matters stand as to the proposed installation of a scanner thereat for drug \ndetection, indicating how this exercise is carried out presently in the absence of \nsuch an equipment, and  \n(b)  the amount of drugs seized over the past five years thereat, indicating the types \nand market value thereof.  \nReply:  In regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Mauritius Revenue \nAuthority (MRA) that on 19 June 2025, a bidding exercise has been launched for the \nprocurement of two X-Ray scanners to be installed at the Parcel Post and the Port in \nRodrigues. The closing date for submission of bids has been fixed for 23 July 2025. It is \nexpected that the contract will be awarded in October 2025 and the equipment will be \ncommissioned in Rodrigues in January 2026.  \nI am further informed by the MRA that all incoming loose packets and parcels are \nprocessed at the Port Louis Post Office commonly known as the Parcel Post Office. Officers \nof the MRA Customs Anti-Narcotics Section (CANS) and Anti-Drug and Smuggling Unit \n(ADSU) are permanently posted thereat with a specific mandate for the detection of \n\n137 \n \nprohibited goods including dangerous drugs. They make use of profiling techniques and X-\nRay scanners and they are assisted by the MRA and ADSU K9 Unit whereby sniffer dogs are \ndeployed on a daily basis for sniffing operation.  \nLoose packets and parcels destined for Rodrigues which are suspected to contain \ndutiable, prohibited goods or products requiring authorization from Other Government \nAgencies (OGA) such as the Ministry of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and \nFisheries, the Ministry of Health and Wellness and the Mauritius Standard Bureau are \nretained for physical examination by Customs Officers posted at Port Mathurin Post Office. \nThe retained packets and parcels are placed in bags, which are sealed by Officers of the MRA \nCustoms and the Mauritius Post Ltd, to be transported to the airport and to Rodrigues under \ncustoms control. This exercise is monitored by the representatives of MRA Customs and the \nMauritius Post Ltd. Should the MRA CANS and ADSU have reasons to believe that a \nparticular packet or parcel might contain dangerous drugs, the Officer-in-Charge of the MRA \nCustoms and ADSU of both Mauritius and Rodrigues are immediately notified to that effect.  \nIn Rodrigues, Customs Officers posted at the Port Mathurin Post Office carries out a \nfurther profiling exercise with the assistance of Police dogs. All the retained suspicious \npackets and parcels are examined by Customs and ADSU Officers in the presence of the \nconsignee in accordance with section 27 of the Customs Act and the MRA Customs \nDepartmental Instruction No.1 of 2016.  \nIn case of any detection of dangerous drugs and other prohibited goods in the parcel, \nsame is secured and handed over to ADSU/CID for safe custody and enquiry.  \nFor local parcels and packets destined for Rodrigues, the packaging is done in presence \nof the representatives of the Mauritius Post Ltd at the Post Office counters. The sender has to \nprovide a detailed list of contents being shipped to Rodrigues. Sniffer dogs are deployed at \nthe Parcel Post Office for the detection of prohibited goods. Scanning exercise is also carried \nout whenever necessary. All the operations are carried out in the presence of representatives \nof Mauritius Post Ltd, prior to dispatching to Rodrigues. Customs Officers posted at the Port \nMathurin Post Office carry out a profiling exercise to identify any suspicious packet and \nparcel for physical examination. \n\n138 \n \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that \nfor year 2020 to 03 July 2025, two cases of Possession of Dangerous Drugs concerning loose \nparcels at Port Mathurin Post Office were reported as follows –  \n(i) \non 18 August 2020, two male persons were arrested when they came to collect \ntheir loose parcel which contained 1.44 grams of heroin having a street value of \nRs 15,000. They were sentenced on 15 September 2023, and \n(ii) \non 14 May 2025, a loose parcel suspected to contain 3.25 grams of Cannabis \nhaving a street value of Rs 3,936 remained unclaimed at Port Mathurin Post \nOffice. The report of the Forensic Science Laboratory is awaited for \nconfirmation. Police enquiry is ongoing. \n \nROSE BELLE CIVIL STATUS OFFICE – RELOCATION \n(No. B/594) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Rose \nBelle Civil Status Office, he will state if consideration will be given for the relocation thereof \nin a premise of good standard and comprising basic amenities and in the vicinity of the \nHealth Office delivering permits for cremation. \n(Withdrawn) \nOFFICIAL OVERSEAS MISSIONS – FORMER PRIME MINISTER, \nMINISTERS & MPs – COSTS BREAKDOWN \n(No. B/595) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to official overseas missions undertaken by the former Prime Minister, former \nMinisters and Members of Parliament over the period 2015 to 2019 and 2020-2024, \nrespectively, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the total cost \nincurred therefor, including the cost of airfares and per diem allowances. \n(Vide Reply to PQ B/581) \n \n\n139 \n \nDRUGS – WEST COAST & “LA PASSE” ENTRANCES – ARRESTS  \n(No. B/596) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to drugs, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the \nnumber of arrests effected on the West Coast in connection therewith, especially, on boats \ncoming from Reunion Island, indicating if consideration will be given for the installation of \nSafe City Surveillance Cameras on the four entrances of “La Passe”. \n(Withdrawn) \nDIEGO GARCIA – UK-US MILITARY BASE –AIR STRIKES AGAINST IRAN \n(No. B/597) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port-Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the joint UK-US military base located on Diego Garcia in the Chagos Archipelago \non which the Republic of Mauritius exercises its sovereignty, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to whether same was used in the recent air strikes launched \nagainst the Islamic Republic of Iran. \nReply: The answer is no. \nRODRIGUES – MOTOR VEHICLE LICENCE PLATFORM – AVAILABLE \nSERVICES  \n(No. B/626) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nLand Transport whether, in regard the online Motor Vehicle Licence Platform, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information as \nto whether same is currently available to residents of Rodrigues and, if so, indicate the \nservices available through same. \nReply: I am informed by the National Land Transport Authority (NLTA) that there are \ncurrently 22,514 Motor Vehicle Licence (MVL)Tax payers in Rodrigues which include 21, \n838 owners of private vehicles and 676 Public Service Vehicle licensees. \nPreviously, MVLs were being renewed at the three counters at the NLTA Rodrigues \nOffice at Baie Lascar, Port Mathurin and the five post offices which are located at Port \nMathurin, Mont Lubin, La Ferme, Grand Montagne and Rivière Coco. \n\n140 \n \nHowever, since 20 September 2024, the Online MVL platform has been introduced in \nRodrigues whereby the residents can avail from the same online facilities as those provided in \nMauritius, namely – \nI. \nrenewal of Motor Vehicle Licence (MVL - commonly known as “Déclaration”) \nby owners of private vehicles, and \nII. \nrenewal of both MVL and Public Service Vehicle Licence (PSVL also commonly \nknown as “Patente”) by holders of PSVL. \n \nIt is to be highlighted that the initial online MVL platform has had a meagre uptake in \nRodrigues such that only 21 users thereat (representing less than 1%) have renewed their \nMVL online since its introduction on 20 September 2024 up to end of May 2025 implying \nthat most MVLs are still being renewed at the NLTA Rodrigues Office and Post Offices. \nSurprisingly, since the launching of the enhanced Online MVL platform on 03 June this \nyear, both in Mauritius and Rodrigues, only two online transactions have been carried on the \nsaid platform in Rodrigues.  \nThis Government has always favoured a very inclusive approach in policy making and \nimplementation. Accordingly, my Ministry has already started working on several strategic \nareas which need to be strengthened in Rodrigues with a view to ensuring coherence in the \npolicies and facilities provided to the citizens of Rodrigues. To that effect, a visit to \nRodrigues in the very near future is also being contemplated and a hotline facility service will \nsoon be put in place to assist users. This will be accompanied by a sensitisation campaign. \nAs regards the Online MVL system, my Ministry will work closely with the NLTA \nOffice in Rodrigues and other stakeholders in order to take prompt remedial actions that will \nassist in boosting the uptake of this platform in the best interest of the citizens of Rodrigues. \n \nPALMA DISPENSARY – PROPOSED RENOVATION/RELOCATION \n(No. B627) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the dispensary at Palma, he \nwill state if consideration will be given for the renovation or relocation thereof and, if so, \nindicate when, giving details thereof and, if not, why not. \n(Withdrawn) \nGLYPHOSATE & GLYPHOSATE-BASED HERBICIDES – PROPOSED BANNING \n\n141 \n \n(No. B/628) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides, he will state if consideration will be \ngiven for the banning thereof in Mauritius in the light of the scientific evidence established \nby the global research led by the Ramazzini Institute (June 2025) linking the use thereof and \nthe carcinogenic effects of exposure thereto at levels previously deemed safe by EU \nstandards. \n(Withdrawn) \n \n \n \n \nMORCELLEMENT ST ANDRÉ FOOTBALL GROUND – UPGRADING \n(No. B/629) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Morcellement St André Football \nGround, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the – \n(a) \nquantum of funds allocated for the upgrading thereof, more specifically for the \nlighting and fencing thereof, and \n(b) \nexpected start and completion dates thereof. \n(Withdrawn) \n \nSMALL SUGARCANE PLANTERS – SUPPORT MEASURES \n(No. B/630) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the small sugarcane planters, he will state the measures being taken to secure – \n(a) \nadequate labour availability for the cultivation and harvesting of the fields \nthereof; \n(b) \navailability thereto of mechanised solutions to address labour shortage; \n(c) \nimproved targeted financial assistance, subsidies or credit schemes to support \nmechanisation and improve overall productivity and viability thereof, and \n(d) \nimportation of labour with other Ministries. \n(Withdrawn) \n\n142 \n \n \nCOTTAGE-POUDRE D'OR HAMLET ROAD – ROAD SAFETY MEASURES – \nROAD WIDENING \n(No. B/631) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the road from Cottage to Poudre \nd'Or Hamlet, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Road Development \nAuthority, information as to whether consideration will be given for the implementation of \nroad safety measures thereat, including the – \n (a)  installation of pavements and handrails through compulsory acquisition of lands \nalong the main roads to ensure pedestrian security, and  \n(b) \nwidening thereof. \n(Withdrawn) \n14TH MONTH BONUS 2025 – RETIREES/PENSIONERS – ELIGIBILITY \n(No. B/632) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nLabour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to the payment of the 14th Month’ Bonus \n2025, he will state the number of retirees/pensioners having reportedly not received same as \nat to date, indicating if certain categories thereof are not eligible thereto and, if not, why not. \nReply: I wish to refer the hon. Member to my reply to PQ B/310 at our Sitting of 08 \nApril 2025, whereby, I informed the House that, in December 2024, Government introduced \na Special Allowance (14th month bonus) for some 420,200 employees from both the private \nand public sectors as well as a one-month allowance to every pensioner, widow, orphan and \ndisabled person in Mauritius. This applies to individuals who draw a basic wage salary at a \nrate not exceeding Rs50,000 monthly. \nThe Special Allowance is equivalent to one-month basic wage or salary for employees \nwho have been in continuous employment for the whole of the year 2024 or is pro-rated for \nthose who were in continuous employment for only part of the year 2024, including those \nwho retired during the course of year 2024. \nAs at end of August 2025, my Ministry has received representations concerning non-\npayment of Special Allowance from retired employees relating to five organisations, namely, \nMauritius Post Ltd, Cargo Handling Corporation Ltd, Airports of Mauritius Ltd, Central \nElectricity Board and Mauritius Cane Industry Authority. \nIn all the above cases, the employees had retired prior to year 2024 and accordingly, \nwere not eligible for the Special Allowance 2024, as per the provisions of the Special \nAllowance Act 2024. \n\n143 \n \nThe State Law Office which was consulted on the matter has highlighted that – \na) \nGovernment’s decision of 13 December 2024 refers only to the payment of a \n14th month bonus to beneficiaries of basic pensions and public pensioners, and \nb) \non 19 December 2024, the Ministry of Finance has issued a Circular which \nprovided for the modalities and arrangements for the payment of 14th month \nbonus for year 2024 to public officers, local government officers, officers of the \nRodrigues Regional Assembly and employees of statutory bodies whose terms \nand conditions are governed by the Pay Research Bureau.  \nThe State Law Office has thus opined that as the law currently stands there is no legal \nrequirement for the payment of the Special Allowance to the pensioners of the aforesaid \nentities. \nWith regard to complaints received at the Inspection and Enforcement Section in the \ndifferent Labour Offices, I am informed that 26 individual cases were received for non-\npayment of the Special Allowance 2024 to eligible employees who retired during the year \n2024 out of which – \na) \n22 cases were settled and an amount of Rs271,275.34 was paid; \nb) \none case was rejected because the complainant failed to turn up; \nc) \nof the two cases where the employer has refused to settle the Special Allowance, \none case has been referred to the Industrial Court by way of a Plaint and the \ncase is coming Pro Forma on 16 October 2025 and the other case has been \nreferred to Chambers and the Pro Forma date is yet to be communicated to my \nMinistry, and \nd) \nin one case, parties have agreed for payment in instalments and the last \ninstalment will be paid by the end of September 2025. \n \nROCHE BOIS WASTE TRANSFER STATION – RELOCATION PROJECT– \nCOMPULSORY LAND ACQUISITION AT BAIE DU TOMBEAU \n(No. B/633) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet ) asked \nthe Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the land situated around the Waste \nWater Treatment Plant at Baie du Tombeau, he will state the reasons why his Ministry is \npursuing the compulsory acquisition thereof for the proposed relocation of the Waste \nTransfer Station of Roche Bois thereat when the Ministry of Environment has not prepared \nand Government has not approved any such project. \n(Withdrawn) \n\n144 \n \n \nDIVING CENTRE ACCIDENT – INQUIRY – REMEDIAL ACTIONS \n(No. B/634) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Tourism whether, in regard to the recent accident that occurred in a \ndiving centre in the north of the island, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to – \n(a) \nwhether an inquiry has been carried out thereinto and the outcome thereof;  \n(b) \nremedial actions taken, if any, in relation to the suspected cause thereof, \n and \n(c) \nthe measures taken, if any, to accompany family members of the victim thereof. \n(Withdrawn) \nPUBLIC PLACES – RAT INFESTATION – URGENT REMEDIAL MEASURES & \nCONTRACTS \n(No. B/635) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the public places, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Health Services, information as to \nwhether rat infestation has been observed thereat and, if so, indicate if urgent remedial \nmeasures will be taken in relation thereto, including if consideration will be given for the \ncontracting out of the services to private rodent control service providers. \nReply: The issue regarding rat infestation in public places falls under the purview of \nother national agencies such as the Ministry of Local Government and Ministry of \nEnvironment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change. These Ministries make their \nown arrangements for rodent control through the appointment of specialised private service \nproviders. \nHowever, the Rodent Control Unit (RCU) of my Ministry performs regular rodent \ncontrol activities in all public health institutions, namely all Government Hospitals, \nMediclinics, Area Health Centres, Community Health Centres, Medical Stores, Vagrant \nDepot and various offices of my Ministry, as well as, other Government institutions, such as, \nthe Prime Minister’s Office in case of any complaints received. The Unit also carries out \ninterventions on private premises where Leptospirosis cases have been notified. \nFrom 2019 to May 2025 – \n(i) \nthe RCU has conducted 54,325 visits; \n\n145 \n \n(ii) \n25,411 rats have been caught and killed, and \n(iii) 45,150 sensitisation programmes on rodent control for the public have been \ncarried out by the Unit. \nRODRIGUES – NEW SPORTS BILL – COMITÉ RÉGIONAL OLYMPIQUE ET \nSPORTIF \n(No. B/636) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nYouth and Sports whether, in regard to the proposed introduction of a new administrative \nframework and a new Sports Bill, he will state where matters stand, indicating if – \n(a) \nprior consultations have been or will be held with Rodrigues sports communities, \nand \n(b) \nGovernment is agreeable to the setting up of a special committee to make \nrecommendations on the setting up and missions of a Comité Régional Olympique \net Sportif (CROS) for Rodrigues and, if so, when. \n \n(Withdrawn) \n \nSSR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – BYPASS ROAD – UPGRADING & \nEMBELLISHMENT \n(No. B/637) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the new bypass road \nleading to the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Road Development Authority, information as to whether \nconsideration will be given for the – \n(a) \nupgrading and embellishing of the roundabouts and motorway along same, and \n(b) \nreview of the existing and installation of new directional road traffic signs and \nstreet lighting thereat. \nReply: The House may recall that in 2017, the Road Development Authority (RDA) \nimplemented the New Airport Access Road, which the hon. Member is referring to as the \nnew bypass road leading to the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport. However, \nit is only now after I assumed office, that an agreement has been finalised and duly signed for \nthe transfer of lands on which the road had been constructed.  \n\n146 \n \nThose lands belong mostly to Omnicane Ltd and, partly, to some ten private land \nowners. With the signature of the agreement, the private land owners will now be provided \nagricultural land at the ratio of 1:1.25, that is, for a portion of land of an extent of 1m2 \ntransferred to Government, Omnicane will transfer an extent of 1.25m2 of land to them. \n \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that, along this road, there are \nfive roundabouts which are all being maintained by private companies namely – \n(i) \nSir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport roundabout – embellished \nand maintained by Airports of Mauritius Co. Ltd; \n(ii) \nMon Trésor roundabout – embellished and maintained by Omnicane Limited; \n(iii) \nDes Places roundabout – embellished and maintained by Omnicane Limited; \n(iv) \nUnion Vale roundabout – embellished and maintained by Omnicane Limited, \nand \n(v) \nMare D'Albert roundabout – embellished and maintained by Aegle Onco Care \nCentre Ltd. \nI am also informed by the RDA that it ensures regular inspection of the road and is \nsatisfied that these roundabouts are being maintained properly. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed by the RDA that it has carried out \na survey along the road to identify faded or deficient directional road traffic signs. \nAccordingly, eight traffic signs have been replaced in June 2025 and eight are being \nmanufactured to be replaced by end of this month. This will ensure a better visibility of the \nsigns as well as better directional guidance. \nAs regards street lighting, I would like to refer the hon. Member to my reply of 18 \nMarch 2025 wherein I informed the House that the provision and maintenance of all street \nlighting found along Motorways M1, M2 and M3, including the new road leading to the Sir \nSeewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport, fall under the purview of the Local \nAuthorities and the Central Electricity Board (CEB).  \nI am also given to understand from the District Council of Grand Port that it is liaising \nwith its parent Ministry, for the handing over of the street lighting network, along that stretch, \nto the CEB. \nHIGHER EDUCATION – INTERNATIONALISATION – IMPLEMENTATION \nMEASURES \n(No. B/638) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research whether, in regard to the \n\n147 \n \nimplementation of the internationalisation of higher education, he will state the measures \nhitherto taken, as outlined in the Government Programme 2025-2029. \nReply: In line with Government’s vision, as stated in the Government programme \n2025-2029, to position Mauritius as a globally competitive and vibrant higher education hub, \nmy Ministry, in collaboration with the different institutions operating under its aegis, has \ninitiated numerous actions in the areas focused on science, research, innovation and higher \neducation. \nAt the centre of these actions is the setting up of the National Committee on \nInternationalisation of Higher Education, National Committee of Branding and Marketing of \nHigher Education, and the “Study-in-Mauritius” Committee. These committees have \npresented their findings at the Higher Education Summit which was held from 04 to 06 June. \nEach committee comprised several experts with the mandate of recommending a set of \nstrategies to successfully implement the internationalisation of our higher education sector \nunder the “Study in Mauritius” banner. \nThe Committees are actively developing a roadmap to attract international students \nfrom key regions. This also includes reviewing and proposing amendments to visa and work \npermit policies, simplifying application processes, and introducing a post-study work visa \nframework to retain talent. \nSecondly, taking into consideration the importance of students’ well-being and \nintegration, the Committees are also working on guidelines for language support, cultural \nadaptation, access to health services, student orientation, and housing standards tailored to \ninternational needs. \nThirdly, our strategy includes promoting transnational education through joint degrees, \nacademic exchanges, and virtual mobility programmes. The Committee is further exploring \npartnerships with globally reputed institutions to co-organise conclaves of university leaders, \nresearch collaboration platforms, and international academic festivals in Mauritius. \nTo facilitate the internationalisation process and position as a preferred destination for \nthe higher education sector, a strategic collaboration has been established between the Higher \nEducation Commission and the Quality Assurance Agency of the United Kingdom in May of \nthis year. This collaboration will lead to a streamlined accreditation process within the \nMauritian higher education jurisdiction, as programmes which have already been quality \nassured by QAA-UK will be subject to a streamlined accreditation process by HEC. This will \nbe instrumental in positioning Mauritius as a credible, quality-driven educational hub. \n\n148 \n \nWe are also encouraging our higher education institutions to foster international \npartnerships, not as a symbolic gesture, but as a meaningful collaboration that enhances \ninstitutional quality, research output, and global relevance. \nAll these measures converge towards developing the higher education sector as a key \neconomic pillar and transforming Mauritius into a beacon of academic and research \nexcellence. \nMFA SEMI-FINAL MATCH – CERCLE DE JOACHIM vs LA CURE WAVES – \nCHANGE OF VENUE \n(No. B/639) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the change of venue for the holding of \nthe football semi-final match of the Mauritius Football Association (MFA) Cup between \nCercle de Joachim and La Cure Waves on Wednesday 25 June 2025 from the stadium found \nat the Côte d’Or National Sports Complex to the St François Xavier Stadium, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the MFA, information as to the reasons therefor. \nReply: I am informed by the Mauritius Football Association (MFA) that the semi-final \nof the MFA Cup 2025 between Cercle de Joachim Curepipe Club Sportif and La Cure Waves \nS.C. was initially scheduled to be played on Sunday 22 June 2025 at Auguste Vollaire \nStadium and the final on Saturday 28 June 2025 at the Côte d’Or National Sports Complex. \nI am further informed by the MFA that the final of the Republic Cup 2025 was \nscheduled on Wednesday 25 June 2025 at Côte d’Or National Sports Complex. \nThe MFA has informed that its National Managing Committee met on 16 June 2025 \nand decided that a final such as the Republic Cup must be organised during a weekend \ninstead of a weekday. Since the final of the MFA Cup was already scheduled for Saturday 28 \nJune 2025 and that La Cure Waves S.C. could also be qualified for the MFA Cup Final, the \nMFA opted for the weekend 21 to 22 June 2025. \nI am informed that it was in this context that the National Managing Committee of the \nMFA decided to play the final of the Republic Cup on Sunday, 22 June 2025 at Auguste \nVollaire Stadium and the semi-final of the MFA Cup on 25 June 2025 at Côte d’Or National \nSports Complex. However, the MFA’s request to play the semi-final of the MFA Cup at Côte \n\n149 \n \nd’Or National Sports Complex on Wednesday, 25 June 2025 was turned down by the \nMauritius Multisports Infrastructure Ltd. as they had approved only for finals to be played. \nAccordingly, I am informed by the MFA that St. Francois Xavier stadium was the only \nalternative stadium with lighting that could host this semi-final on a weekday. \nST MARTIN DAM LEISURE PARK PROJECT – CONTRACTOR/S – MATERIALS \nSUPPLY \n(No. B/640) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the St Martin Dam Leisure \nPark Project in Quartier Militaire, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nDistrict Council of Moka, information as to – \n(a) \nthe names of the contractor/s involved therein, indicating the quantum of funds \npaid to each in respect of works carried out, and \n(b) \nif the District Council supplied materials therefor and, if so, give details \nthereof. \n(Withdrawn)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-08-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/641",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 641,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/641) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Horse \nRacing Integrity Division, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Gambling \nRegulatory Authority, information as to the names of the successful candidates for all the \npositions advertised thereat, indicating – \n(a) \nhow the selection exercises were carried out, and \n(b) whether due diligence exercises were carried out in relation thereto and, if so, how \nand, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as the House is aware, the Gambling \nRegulatory Authority (Amendment) Act, was passed on 04 July 2025, and came into \noperation on 07 July 2025.  \nThe main aim of this amendment was to do away with the Horse Racing Division and \nset up instead the Horse Racing Integrity Division, which has now the responsibility to \n\n17 \n \nprotect the integrity of horse racing and ensure that horse racing is fair, clean and free from \ncorruption or malpractice.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me remind the House why we came up with the Horse \nRacing Integrity Division. The defunct Horse Racing Division had developed an incestuous \nrelationship with the gambling don at the time. The people at the Horse Racing Division were \nworking hand-in-hand with the organiser of horse racing, who also had his hand in the whole \ngambling industry.  \nThis unacceptable state of affairs tarnished the integrity of the whole racing industry. It \ntotally destroyed public confidence in the horse racing industry and led to the oldest stable in \nMauritius, the Gujadhur Stable, to actually fold, after more than a century of running horses \nin Mauritius. And, they said, they will come back only if there is an operation to clean up this \ncorruption.  \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the government is determined to relaunch the horse racing \nindustry. This was one of the promises made during the electoral campaign and we are \nsticking to our promise. There have been hurdles, but we are overcoming them, and the horse \nracing organiser is, I understand, doing his utmost to ensure that horse racing starts at the \nearliest possible. \nWe want a racing industry which will promote the welfare and leisure of the race going \npublic and bring back the race goers to the Champ de Mars.  \nAlready, I can say, last Saturday, I have been informed that the racing public had come \nin numbers, far higher than before, to the Champ de Mars, to watch the first barrier trials of \nthe season. Apparently, there were more people present last Saturday at the racing than… at \nwhat happened yesterday, and also at the one organised last year by the defunct People’s Turf \nPLC of the gambling don. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard part (a) of the question, I am informed by the \nGambling Regulatory Authority that the recruitment exercise was done in a transparent way \nand in line with best practices.  \nThe Gambling Regulatory Authority approved, at its special meetings of 21 February \n2025 and 11 March 2025, the launching of Expressions of Interest for the various positions \nwithin the proposed Horse Racing Integrity Division, in anticipation to a new code; a new \nstructure being codified. Now, the Expressions of Interest were published in three newspapers \nand on the website of the Gambling Regulatory Authority.  \n\n18 \n \nAt the Gambling Regulatory Authority Board Meeting on 02 April 2025, the interview \npanel was constituted for all the posts comprising three Board Members of the Gambling \nRegulatory Authority.  \nAfter the closing date for the submission of Expressions of Interest, an administrative \nscreening exercise was carried out to ascertain that the qualifications and experience criteria \nwere met. The candidates who satisfied these criteria were then called for an interview.  \nThe report of the interview panel for the positions of Chief Stipendiary Steward and the \nDeputy Chief Stipendiary Steward was approved by the Board on 23 April 2025 and on 11 \nJune of this year for the other posts. Letters of Award and sub-contracts were issued as from \n04 July of this year. \nI am tabling a list of all those persons who have been successful and have accepted \ntheir letters of offer. \nAs for part (b) of the question, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that a due \ndiligence was carried out by the AML/CFT Team of the GRA as per its internal procedures, \nwhich included a Supreme Court-Check, a Mauritius Revenue Authority-Check, World-\nCheck, Sanctions List, criminal records and media search. \nFurthermore, all selected candidates who have accepted the appointment have been \ngiven time to produce their Certificate of Character as soon as possible. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, do you have a supplementary? \nMr Quirin: Merci, M. le président. Puisqu’on parle d’intégrité, M. le président, \nl’honorable Premier ministre, est-il au courant que sur le nouveau board des stipes se trouve \nmonsieur Y. N., qui avait démissionné comme commissaire à la MTC pour avoir accepté un \ncadeau d’un jockey ? Un délit qu’on peut considérer comme étant grave ! Et aussi un ex-\nentraîneur monsieur P. M. qui avait été sanctionné pour dopage par le nouveau Chief Stipe de \nla HRID. De plus, messieurs A.R. et A.R., deux proches de monsieur J.M.L.S. et de PTP \nrespectivement, sont parmi les nouvelles recrues. \nL’honorable Premier ministre peut-il dire s’il est satisfait justement de ce due diligence \nprocess qui a été effectué ? \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I do not run the GRA! The GRA has a \nduty; it went through a procedure, and this is what I explained. These are the people who \nwere selected after this very, very thorough procedure that was made. \n\n19 \n \n Mr Quirin: M. le président, une dernière question ? \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, one last question.  \nMr Quirin: Yes! \nThe Deputy Speaker: A question; not a statement! \nMr Quirin: L’honorable premier ministre peut-il dire à la Chambre quels sont les \ncritères qui ont été pris en compte pour le choix du Chief Stipe ? Sait-il que monsieur S.D.C. \nfaisait partie du Licensing Committee de la GRA avant même sa nomination ? N’est-ce pas un \ncas flagrant de conflit d’intérêt où un licencié – je termine – de la GRA agissait aussi comme \ndécideur pour le régulateur ? Est-ce que cela ne le disqualifie-t-il pas pour ce poste ? \nThe Prime Minister: As I said, I do not run the GRA. But according to my \ninformation, he was never on the Licensing Committee. \nThe Deputy Speaker: You have one question? Okay, one last one! \nMr Lesjongard: May I ask the hon. Prime Minister whether he can confirm that \namong the stipes who have been freshly nominated, are there members of the Mauritius Turf \nClub? \nThe Prime Minister: As far as I understand, they have all taken leave. It is a new \nparadigm that we are doing. They are not there anymore. \nThe Deputy Speaker: PQ B/642 has been withdrawn. So, we proceed with PQ B/643. \nHon. First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix! \nWEST COAST – DRUGS RELATED ARRESTS – INQUIRIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/642",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 642,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/642) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to drugs, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to – \n(a) \nthe number of arrests effected on the West Coast in connection therewith over \nthe past five years, indicating – \n(i) \nif the arrested persons are Mauritian or foreign nationals, and \n(ii) \nwhere matters stand as to the inquiries initiated thereinto, and \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given for the installation of Safe City Surveillance \nSystem Cameras on the four entrances of “La Passe”. \n\n20",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPOLICE FORCE – REWARD MONEY SYSTEM – DISBURSEMENT MECHANISM",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/643",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 643,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/643) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether in regard to reward money, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to \nthe – \n(a) \nquantum thereof allocated in each financial year to Police Officers over the past \nfive years; \n(b) \nprocedures followed therefor, and \n(c) \ncheck and balance mechanism put in place to prevent abuse and illicit use \nthereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with your permission, I am replying to \nParliamentary Questions B/643 and B/646 together.  \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Police that reward money is paid to Police \nOfficers who are engaged in the fight against dangerous drugs based on the following factors \n– \n(i) \nnature and the circumstances; \n(ii) \npersons arrested and the number thereof; \n(iii) \nquantity and value of drugs and exhibits secured; \n(iv) \nrisks involved, and  \n(v) \nreliability and regularity of the informers. \n \nWith regard to the quantum allocated to Police Officers in each of the past five years, I \nam providing this information – \n• \nIn 2020-2021, a sum of Rs6,220,000 was budgeted, but Rs1,113,800 was \ndisbursed to informers and Rs225,540 to Police Officers. You  \ncan see the big difference. Police Officers were getting less than the informers. \n• \nFor 2021-2022, Rs224,000 for Police Officers, but Rs13,269,200 for informers.  \n• \nAgain, in 2022-2023, Rs229,740 to Police Officers, but Rs74,485,040 for \ninformers.  \n\n21 \n \n• \nI must say in 2023-2024 and in 2024-2025, no money was disbursed to Police \nOfficers at all. But the informers, in 2023-2024, received Rs84,613,750, and for \nlast year, Rs56,014,300. \n \nLet me give the details of the monthly disbursement for the reward of money from July \n2024 to December 2024. In July, the total amount disbursed was Rs4,586,450.  \nIn August 2024, it was Rs368,900. But in September 2024, it jumped to Rs11,242,900. \nIn October 2024, it jumped to Rs38,932,450. You will be glad to hear that in November and \nDecember of last year, the amount disbursed is nil. Zero! \nNow, the House will note – I am sure, seeing their expression – that from September to \nOctober 2024, a total amount of Rs50,175,350 was paid as reward money not to Police \nOfficers, only to informers! \nMs Anquetil: Incroyable! \nThe Prime Minister: Now, this is two months prior to the general elections. You can \nguess the reason why this happened.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, one disturbing element that comes from that information is \nthat the amount disbursed exceeds by far the amount budgeted. \nIn other words, as usual, they just give money. Money that is not theirs! This, in itself, \nraises several questions as to the manner in which that money was disbursed. It is worth \nmentioning that in 2014, it was decided to put an end to the practice of giving reward money \nas there was strong, very suspicion of abuse. This is when we left government.  \nHowever, in 2016, the practice was restored. Now, in 2020, soon after his appointment, \nthe then Commissioner of Police, Mr Servansing, tried to rationalise – because he was not \nallowed to change it – the procedure through an amendment to Police Standing Order 122.  \nSubsequently, in 2021, the then Mr Servansing was gone. The new Commissioner of \nPolice, Mr Anil Kumar Dip, again, amended Police Standing Order 122, which allowed \npayment to reward money to informers although the case may not have been disposed by the \ncourt. Even before, he was giving the money! Also, simply from obtaining a report from the \nforensic lab certifying that the exhibits were secured as dangerous drugs. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, is it a coincidence that as from 2022, we noted a fundamental \nincrease to the amount disbursed, as I said, to informers with hardly any money given to \n\n22 \n \nPolice Officers? Even a cursory look at some of the information provided suggests that those \nat the helm of the Police were wallowing in muck of malfeasance and corruption, with a \ndeeply entrenched complicity throughout the whole procedure put in place. \nIn fact, the whole procedure was put in place for them to be able to it. It also begs the \nquestion as to what exactly was the role of the Manager Financial Operations and the internal \ncontrol play in the management of finance of the Police Force. This is being enquired into. \nWhat was their role? What were they there for? \nAn hon. Member: Voler! \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as the House is aware, the Financial \nCrimes Commission is inquiring into the whole issue of reward money, and we are amending \nthe Financial Crimes Commission Act precisely this afternoon so that there can be a joint \nenquiry whenever the need arises. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in view of the high risk of abuse and illicit use of the reward \nmoney within the Police Force and to establish a transparent and accountable system to \nprevent such corrupt practices, the FCC, as an independent institution and as mandated under \nsection 6 (2)(g) of the Financial Commission Act, is reviewing the practices and procedures \nregarding the disbursement of reward money to Police Officers and to informers. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Lobine! \nMr Lobine: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir.  \nMay I ask the hon. Prime Minister, in view of the opacity surrounding the procedures \nwith regard to disbursement of those reward money which amount to a big scandal with \nregard to the sum being paid, is it not a fit and proper case under the new Public Inquiries Act \n2025 to set up an inquiry with regard to procedures and disbursement of money from 2015 up \nto that date, with regard to those big sums of money? We are talking as per reports in the \npress, more than Rs200 million with regard to reward money. Is it not a fit and proper case \nfor a public inquiry? \nThe Prime Minister: The case is in court actually. It is exactly for the amount of the \nreward money. Mr Lilram Deal, for example, who was an Assistant Commissioner of Police, \nwas arrested – this is precisely one of the things he was arrested for. He appeared in front of \nthe District Court of Port Louis with a provisional charge and, again, all these are being \ninvestigated. \n\n23 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Juman! \nMr Juman: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Hon. Prime Minister, can we have an \nidea of the amount of drugs seized for the period September/October 2024 where Rs50 \nmillion… \nThe Deputy Speaker: We are talking about reward money. We are not talking about \ndrugs. I do not think the hon. Prime Minister will have this answer. Come with a proper \nquestion! \nThere is a question. Relevant to this question? \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. May I ask the hon. Prime Minister, \nwhether he has recommended or he has been made aware by the Commissioner of Police if a \ndepartmental inquiry within the Police has been set up in regard to reward money and if that \ncan be extended to the defunct unit of the Police, namely the SST which itself has been in the \nlimelight for uncouth practices, particularly with regard to the declared amount seized against \namount what was really seized? Thank you. \nThe Prime Minister: Precisely, this inquiry is ongoing within the Police department. \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Hon. First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix! \nCOVID-19 (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 2020 – PROSECUTIONS – \nCONVICTIONS & FINES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/644",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 644,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/644) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the COVID-19 \n(Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2020, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the number of individuals prosecuted thereunder, \nindicating the –  \n(a) \nnumber of convictions secured, and  \n(b) \ntotal value of the fines imposed and collected in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSAFE CITY PROJECT – CAMERAS INSTALLED – CONTRACT COST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/645",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 645,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/645) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \n\n24 \n \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Safe City \nProject, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, \ninformation as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of cameras initially planned for installation, indicating the number \nthereof – \n(i) \nactually installed, and \n(ii) \ncurrently damaged, defective and non-operational, and \n(b) \ninitial contractual cost and actual cost thereof, including maintenance costs, \nindicating if consideration will be given to invoke the ‘Refresh’ clause in the \ncontract and, if so, provide justifications for any additional investments therein.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I refer the hon. Member to the reply I \nmade to PQ I B/51 on 17 December 2024 where I had provided details of the main \ncomponents of the Safe City Project. \nWith regard to part (a) (i) and (ii) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner \nof Police that the project was initially planned for the installation of 4,000 intelligent video \nsurveillance cameras and 300 intelligent traffic surveillance cameras. There has been no \nchange in the number of cameras to be installed.  \nAll the intelligent video surveillance cameras have been installed – all of them. \nHowever, there are four which have been damaged and 24 are being relocated.  \nConcerning the intelligent traffic surveillance cameras, up to now, only 157 of the \ncameras have been installed. The remaining 143 will be installed after the completion of civil \nworks scheduled to be completed by the end of September 2025. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (b) of the question, I am informed by the \nCommissioner of Police that the maintenance cost is included in the contract sum. The \noperation and maintenance costs amount to USD 8.7 million, annually. \nAs at June 2025, an amount of Rs98,952,549.45 has been paid to Mauritius Telecom. I \nam further informed that the contracts make provisions for Mauritius Telecom to conduct two \nplanned refreshes with updated technologies every 5 to 7 years which are included in the \ncontract sum. \nThere is no additional investment in other words. The first refresh will start in \nDecember of this year, and the second will be planned for December 2032, I believe. \n\n25 \n \nPOLICE – REWARD MONEY SYSTEM – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/646",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 646,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/646) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port-Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to reward money, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner \nof Police, information as to whether a –  \n(a) \ndepartmental \ninquiry \nhas \nbeen \ninitiated \nfollowing \nrecent \nalleged \nmisappropriations thereof, and  \n(b) \nnew increasingly transparent and accountable system is being envisaged to \nprevent corruptible practices.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/643) \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River! \nMAUBANK LTD – ATTORNEYS & BARRISTERS – FEES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/647",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 647,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/647) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Maubank Ltd., he \nwill for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to the number of Attorneys \nand Barristers in the private practice whose services were retained thereat since 2014 to 2024, \nindicating the total quantum of fees paid thereto.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that \nMaubank Ltd. is a subsidiary owned by Maubank Holdings Ltd. The Government of \nMauritius is in turn the sole shareholder of Maubank Holdings Ltd. Maubank Ltd. has been \nincorporated in January 2016 to carry on banking businesses of ex-Mauritius Post and \nCooperative Bank. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by Maubank Ltd. that over the period 2016 to \n2024, the company has retained the services of 39 Attorneys and Barristers in the private \npractice, of which 15 are law firms.  \nThe total amount paid to them is Rs40,930,790. \nThe list is long, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I propose to table the list of Attorneys and \nBarristers, but let me say among the top earners, there are – \n\n26 \n \n(i) \nRavindra Chetty SC, Chambers was paid an amount of Rs6,289,350.  \n(ii) \nMardemootoo Solicitors, Rs5,763,322.  \n \nI could go on and on, but I think it is preferable to table the list. \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Next question. Hon. First Member for Savanne and Black \nRiver! \n \nCOCAINE SEIZURE (95 KG) – INTERPOL ASSISTANCE – DRUG STORAGE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/648",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 648,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/648) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands  whether, in regard to the 95 kg of \ncocaine worth Rs 1.4 billion seized in a backhoe loader on 04 July 2019, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to where \nmatters stand regarding the inquiry initiated thereinto, indicating whether the – \n(a) \nassistance of Interpol is envisaged in relation thereto, and \n(b) \ncocaine is in the possession of the Police and, if so, further indicate whether – \n(i) \nall the 95 kg is stored and where, and \n(ii) \nregular monitoring thereof is carried out.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I again wish to refer the hon. Member \nto the reply I made to Parliamentary Question B/205 on March of this year where I gave \ndetails of the seizure of the 92.5 kg of cocaine in the tractopelle on 10 July 2019. The value \nwas of Rs1.4 billion. R 1.4 milliards! Pas millions, milliards!  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the \nCommissioner of Police that, as the case has international ramifications, the Police are \nworking in close collaboration with Interpol and other countries in the region for the \nidentification and the arrest of the probable suspects. \nThe Police have sent the case file together with the report from the Financial \nIntelligence Unit to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions for advice and, \ntherefore, the course of action will be taken, accordingly. \n\n27 \n \nAs for parts (b)(i) and (ii) of the question, I am informed that in accordance with the \nprocedures set out in the Police Standing Orders 138, all the drugs seized are safely kept in \npolice custody and are under 24-hour surveillance. \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle! \n \nPUBLIC SECTOR DEBT – LONG-TERM IMPLICATIONS – FISCAL \nSTABILITY & DEBT SERVICING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/649",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 649,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/649) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nPublic Sector Debt, he will state – \n(a) \nthe level thereof in the year. \n(i) \n2014, and \n(ii) \n2024, respectively, indicating how same compare in nominal and real terms, \nand \n(b) \nwhether the rise thereof to Rs 642 billion is considered sustainable, indicating the \nlong-term implications thereof for fiscal stability and debt servicing.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (a) of the question, the \nPublic Sector Debt nominal terms amounted to Rs238 billion as at the end of December 2014 \nand rose to Rs608.2 billion as at the end of December 2024. In other words, from Rs238 \nbillion in December 2014 to Rs608.2 billion in December 2024. \nIn other words, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, if we just make a quick calculation, it has \nalmost doubled over the 10-year period. At the time, we left office in December 2014, the \nPublic Sector Debt to the GDP ratio stood at 59.5% which was below the 60% then in force, \nwhich we had put in together with what was being done in Europe – 60% of GDP. \nHowever, the previous government’s irresponsible fiscal stewardship resulted in a sharp \nincrease in the debt ratio reaching 87.4% by December 2024. They had themselves extended \nthe ceiling to a statutory ceiling of 80% – from 60% to 80%. They themselves raised that \nagain; it went to 87.4%. The ceiling was raised, precisely in an attempt to conceal the extent \nof the fiscal mismanagement. That is why it was done.  \n\n28 \n \nIn real terms, that is, after adjusting for the rise in GDP deflate over the past 10 years, \nPublic Sector Debt stood around Rs382 billion as at the end of December 2024. \nConcerning part (b) of the question, it is manifestly evident that the estimated level of \npublic debt of Rs642 billion is unsustainable. We cannot sustain it.  \nAccording to the 2025 IMF Article IV Consultation Report, Mauritius is at a high risk \nof sovereign stress, reflecting mostly a high level of vulnerability in the medium and long \nterm. This is why I said to the people who are supposedly protesting – they have no idea. \nThey have no idea what they are saying. The previous government has burdened this country \nwith an overwhelming level of debt. \nIn the fiscal year 2024-2025 alone, public sector debt rose by Rs83 billion, which is \nequivalent to an average daily increase of Rs227 million. We had no options, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir. We had no options but to act responsibly and come up with a fiscal \nconsolidation plan with concrete measures aimed at reducing both the budget deficit and the \npublic sector debt which the previous government shackled the country with.  \nWithout the implementation of these measures, public sector debt would have spiralled \nout of control and they would have had severe repercussions on the public finances, also on \nthe broader economy and on the well-being of the population, including – I tell people, ‘You \ndo not realise’ – no pension to anyone in the coming decades if we do not do anything now. \nNot even at 60, nobody would get pensions. This is what we are facing.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this would have inevitably also led to a downgrade of our \ncredit rating to junk status by Moody’s. Some people do not understand why we should care \nabout Moody’s. There are consequences. Such a downgrade would have had far-reaching \nimplications, including high borrowing costs, adverse effects on the financial services sector. \nThe financial sector would be dead. The depreciation of the rupee would continue; capital \nflight will increase. Why would people put money in a country which has junk status? \nNobody does this. FDI would therefore actually reduce for practical elites and there would be \nbroader negative effects on the economy. It would very seriously jeopardise our long-term \nfiscal stability. \nWith respect to debt servicing, interest payments on Government debt, just interest \npayment, I think many people do not realise – juste sur les intérêts qu’on doit payer, c’est R \n21.8 milliards for 2024-2025 – just to pay for the interest on the debt. This is the second \nlargest expenditure in the whole Government budget after the Basic Retirement Pension. This \n\n29 \n \nyear, due to substantial debt accumulation over the past decade again, interest rates are \nprojected to rise to a staggering Rs26.1 billion. Some people might say: “but you have been \nin Government” but the debt is there. We have to pay the interest on the debt. It will be \nRs26.1 billion. This is a rise of 20% already compared to the precedent year.  \nIt is not our doing; it is the debt that they have accumulated that we have to pay now. \nInstead of paying Rs26.1 billion as interest on debt, imagine – that amount of money could \nhave been used more effectively. It could have been allocated to different priority sectors \nsuch education, health, housing. This money could have gone there. The money could have \nbeen used to pay the interest on the debt.  \nThus, the opportunity cost of high debt servicing is substantial in diverse resources as I \nsaid from the development priorities that could stimulate economic growth and improving \nliving standards. Sustained high level debt, if left unaddressed risks undermining, as I said, \nthe whole country’s growth potential and fiscal resilience. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this is why we have made a firm commitment to reclaim the \nfiscal serenity and gradually bring the public sector debt GDP ratio to a more sustainable \nlevel of 60% as it was when we left government in 2014. \nThe Deputy Speaker: No supplementary? The Table has been advised that the \nfollowing PQs have been withdrawn: B/651, B/652, B/653, B/654, B/655, B/656, B/658, \nB/659, B/660, B/662 B/663, and B/664. \nNow we proceed to questions addressed to hon. Ministers.  \nHon. Members, the Table has been advised that PQ B/665 will be replied by the hon. \nMinister of Health and Wellness.  \nHon. Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nDECLINING BIRTH RATE – MEASURES TAKEN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/650",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 650,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/650) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Accounts of the \nRodrigues Regional Assembly, he will state – \n(a) \nthe measures and remedial actions, if any, taken to strengthen the governance and \nmanagement of public funds for budget transparency, accountability and \ncredibility, and  \n(b) \nwhether new guidelines have been issued for the reallocation and virement of \nfunds, as recommended in the Fourth Report of the Public Accounts Committee \nof the Seventh National Assembly and, if so, give details thereof and, if not, why \nnot.",
      "answer": "Reply: With regard to part (a) of the question, the National Audit Office has observed \nthe following shortcomings in the financial statements of Financial Year 2023/24 of the \nRodrigues Regional Assembly (RRA). \nFirst, the financial statements of RRA for Financial Year 2023/24 were prepared on \ncash basis instead of accrual basis as per the established road map for the adoption of accrual-\nbased International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS). \nThe Ministry of Finance has been providing technical support to the RRA for the \npreparation of financial statements on accrual-based IPSAS. \nSecond, the Director of Audit has highlighted that there was no marked improvement in \nthe functioning of the Internal Control Unit at the level of the RRA. \nTo strengthen the governance at the RRA, measures are being taken to adequately staff \nthe Internal Control Unit. \nThird, the National Audit Office has also mentioned that no Audit Committee Charter \nhas been signed between the Accounting Officer of RRA and the Chairpersons of the Audit \nCommittees of Commissions at the RRA.  As a result, there was no proper follow up on the \nrecommendations of both the Director of Audit and the Internal Control Unit. In fact, no \nmeetings were held by the Audit Committees for Financial Year 2023/24. \nThe Ministry of Finance is working with the RRA to address the weaknesses. \n\n121 \n \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, the Public Accounts Committee, in its report \ndated 01 October 2024, noted with concern – \n“(…) funds were reallocated by the RRA from one vote item to another in excess of the \npermitted 2% of a vote item without notifying the Ministry. Such reallocation of funds \nwas not properly monitored at the level of the Ministry resulting in mismanagement of \nprojects and wastage of public funds.” \nThe Public Accounts Committee has recommended the issuance of new guidelines for \nreallocation and virement of funds by the RRA. \nI wish to inform the House that all financial instructions, including virement, in the \nFinancial Management Kit also apply to Rodrigues, with such modifications and adaptations \nas may be necessary.  \nThe Chief Commissioner’s Office of the RRA has issued a Circular in June 2025 on \nProcedures of Reallocation that are not consistent with the Ministry of Finance policy and \nprinciples on virement. \nI wish to inform the House that the Ministry of Finance will work with the RRA on a \nrevised circular on virement that will ensure consistency with the central government \nbudgetary control and financial governance. \nDUBAI EXPO 2020 – MAURITIAN DELEGATION – PARTICIPATION COST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025",
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/651",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 651,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/651) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether in regard to the Dubai \nExpo 2020, he will state the names of the former Ministers, Parliamentary Private Secretaries \nand Members of Parliament who attended same, indicating in each case, the total \nparticipation cost thereof, giving details as to the – \n(a) \nduration of stay, and  \n(b) \nper diem or any other allowance drawn.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMRS S.O., ATTORNEY AT LAW – FEES & ALLOWANCES & FRINGE \nBENEFITS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/652",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 652,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/652) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \n\n122 \n \nregard to Mrs. S.O., Attorney at Law, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information \nas to the total quantum of fees and allowances paid out thereto, together with the other fringe \nbenefits to which she was entitled over the period 2015 to 2024 in her capacity as legal \nrepresentative, chairperson, board member and for any other legal services rendered to the \ndifferent Ministries and parastatal bodies.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMRS. N. D. J. N. – EXCISE DUTY CONCESSION – IMPERSONATION – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/653",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 653,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/653) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mrs. N. \nD. J. N., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Revenue Authority \nand the Commissioner of Police, respectively, information as to whether an alleged case of \nimpersonation on an application form for excise duty concession submitted in her name has \nbeen reported and, if so, indicate if inquiries have been initiated thereinto and, if so, where \nmatters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCUREPIPE, MALHERBES – 24 SEPT 2024 INCIDENT – INQUIRY STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/654",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 654,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/654) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nincident which occurred on or about 24 September 2024 at Malherbes, in Curepipe, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to \nwhere matters stand regarding the inquiry initiated thereinto following the complaint lodged \nby Mr. G. G.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nROSE BELLE CIVIL STATUS OFFICE – PROPOSED RELOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/655",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 655,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/655) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Rose \nBelle Civil Status Office, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Civil Status \nOffice, information as to whether consideration will be given for the relocation thereof in a \npremise of good standard and comprising basic amenities and in the vicinity of the Health \nOffice delivering permits for cremation. \n\n123",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFORMER PRIME MINISTER – ADVISERS DETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/656",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 656,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/656) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nAdvisers whose services were retained by the former Prime Minister, he will state the names \nand pay packages thereof, including the boards on which they equally served over the period \n2015 to November 2024.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSOCIAL MEDIA – CYBERBULLYING – REPORTED CASES & MEASURES \nTAKEN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/657",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 657,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/657) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to \ncyberbullying on social media, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the number of reported cases thereof since January \n2025 to date, indicating the – \n(a) \nnumber thereof – \n(i) \nin which female victims are involved, and  \n(ii) \nresolved as at to date, and \n(b) \nmeasures envisaged to address the severity of the problem on a national level.",
      "answer": "Reply: With regard to part (a) (i) and (ii) of the question, I am informed by the \nCommissioner of Police that since January 2025 to 11 July 2025, 113 cases having a \nconnotation of cyberbullying have been reported, out of which 58 female victims were \ninvolved. 1 case has been filed as the accused has remained unknown and the remaining 112 \ncases are under inquiry.  \nIt should be highlighted that it is only after the inquiry is completed at the level of the \nPolice and after all elements have been ascertained, that the case is formally prosecuted under \nsection 17 of the Cybersecurity and Cybercrime Act 2021 as cyberbullying.  \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed that the Police and the Computer \nEmergency Response Team of Mauritius, (CERT-MU) of the Ministry of Information \nTechnology, Communication and Innovation have taken several measures to curb the \nproliferation of cyberbullying as follows – \n\n124 \n \n(i) \nThe conduct of cyber patrol by Cybercrime and IT Unit to detect any offences; \n(ii) \nContinuous awareness and sensitization via media and radio programmes for \ndifferent audiences such as educators and students in educational institutions;  \n(iii) the publication of guidelines and informative videos to promote the safe usage of \nthe Internet on the website of the CERT-MU, and \n(iv) the use of alert system by the CERT-MU to the population in case of emerging \nthreats as it was for the case of the OMETV alert which was sent to all the \nschools and colleges across the island in order to sensitise the students. \n I wish to further inform the House that Government is coming up with the \nestablishment of a specialised unit within the Police to deal with issues pertaining to \ncybersecurity with the assistance from foreign expertise. \n \nFOREIGN WORKERS – JAN 2015-2024 – ILLEGAL STAY – NUMBER & \nNATIONALITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/658",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 658,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/658) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to foreign workers recruited since January 2015 to November 2024 having overstayed \ntheir Occupation Permit and currently illegally staying on the Mauritian territory, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the Passport and Immigration Office, information as to \nthe number and nationality thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPOLICE OFFICERS – FOOT & BICYCLE PATROLS – EQUIPMENT UPGRADE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/659",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 659,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/659) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Police Officers assigned to foot and bicycle patrols, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the standard equipment \ncurrently issued thereto, indicating whether any upgrade thereof is currently being envisaged \nin line with international norms and, if so, further indicate the – \n(a) \nequipment being proposed,  \n(b) \nquantity being contemplated, and  \n\n125 \n \n(c) \nexpected timeline for implementation.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSODNAC WELLNESS PARK – OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT – PROPOSED \nREPLACEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/660",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 660,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/660) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nSodnac Wellness Park, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Employees \nWelfare Fund, information as to whether consideration will be given for the replacement of \nthe outdoor equipment found thereat and, if so, give details thereof and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIUS PORTS AUTHORITY – RODRIGUES MISSION – PURPOSE & \nDETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/661",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 661,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/661) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the recent mission \nundertaken by the Chairperson and officers of the Mauritius Ports Authority to Rodrigues, on \nor about 9 to 13 June 2025, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Authority, \ninformation as to the purposes thereof and give details of the outcome thereof and of any \naction taken for improved service delivery.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed that the purpose of the visit was to discuss the recommendations \nof the Port Master Plan as well as taking cognisance of port operational constraints in \nRodrigues. \nDuring the visit, the following issues were discussed with the Chief Commissioner and \nthe officials of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly – \n(i) \nthe construction of a new commercial quay at Pointe Monnier; \n(ii) \nthe lack of space at the container depot due to an increasing number of \ncontainers being transported, and \n(iii) \nthe use of yard equipment for container/cargo handling. \nThese issues are now being considered by the relevant authorities. \n \n\n126 \n \nSSR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – ADDITIONAL PARKING SLOTS – \nDIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/662",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 662,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/662) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Sir \nSeewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom Airport Terminal Operations Ltd., information as to whether consideration will be given \nfor the provision of – \n(a) \nadditional parking slots, roads and exit gates thereat, and \n(b) \nadequate directional signage on the parking areas of the old terminal, \nindicating the current use made thereof and if same will be operational anew \nand, if so, when, giving details thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMR P.K.J. & MRS K.J. – IMMOVEABLE PROPERTY ACQUISITION \nALLEGATIONS – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/663",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 663,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/663) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the allegations levelled against Mr P.K.J. and Mrs K.J. in relation to the acquisition \nof immoveable properties at Angus Road, in Vacoas, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to where matters stand regarding the \ninquiry initiated thereinto, indicating the – \n(a) \nnames of the witnesses heard in relation thereto, further indicating if late Mr L.G. \nand Mr P.K.J. have been heard, and \n(b) \nif there has been any evidence of attempts to close the inquiry.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nBANK OF MAURITIUS – GOVERNOR & DEPUTY GOVERNORS – \nREMUNERATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/664",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 664,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/664) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the current Governor and Deputy Governors of the Bank of Mauritius, he will, for \n\n127 \n \nthe benefit of the House, in each case, obtain information as to the remuneration drawn, \nincluding other allowances/benefits received, whether in cash or in kind.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRIAMBEL TO RIVIÈRE NOIRE – BEACH EROSION – COASTAL \nREHABILITIATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/665",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 665,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/665) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \nwhether, in regard to the declining birth rate, he will state the measures being taken to address \nsame.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Health and Wellness (Mr A. Bachoo): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, \naccording to United Nations and World Health Organisation, by 2050, nearly 75% of \ncountries are expected to have fertility rates below replacement level, that is, 2.1 children per \n\n30 \n \nwomen. In Mauritius, women continue to give birth to fewer children than in the past. The \ntotal fertility rate which is an indication of the average number of babies born to a woman \nduring her childbearing period has maintained a general decreasing trend after 2002. In 2023, \nthe fertility rate was 1.35. For the year 2024, the total fertility rate was estimated at 1.41 with \n12,088 live births. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, fertility decisions are personal, yet shift by systemic factors \nsuch as the economic situation of a person, gender roles and cultural shifts. Moreover, risks \nof career disruption, child-care stress, social expectations may be a deterrent to pregnancy. \nThe issue of low birth rate is very complex and requires a multisectoral approach. In this \ncontext, a multisectoral committee is being set up to look into the issues pertaining to \nincreasing birth rate. The rising prevalence of alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs particularly \namong young adults of reproductive age, poses a significant yet often overlooked threat to \nnational fertility trends. Alcohol and tobacco disrupt the normal functioning of the \nreproductive systems of both men and women and contribute to reduced fertility. These \nsubstances also unfortunately cause poor pregnancy outcomes such as miscarriages or \nstillbirths which may discourage couples from planning a pregnancy. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that various measures have been \ntaken by my Ministry which include among others, preconception care clinics have been set \nup in primary healthcare centres to educate women on the importance of planned \npregnancies. A fertility clinic has been established at SSRN Hospital to address fertility \nissues. The attendance to this clinic was 462 since January 2024. Intrauterine insemination is \ncurrently being offered and the clinic has conducted 62 interventions since January 2024 so \nfar.  \nMaternity leave has been increased from 14 to 16 weeks and paternity leave of four \nweeks was introduced in the 2024 budget. Community Healthcare Officers conduct extensive \ncanvassing and counselling for women of reproductive age in areas such as family planning, \npreconception care, premarital counselling and postpartum contraception, boosting antenatal \nservices and providing resources like the maternal and child health handbook to guide parents \nand track health. Breastfeeding time is being allocated to breastfeeding mothers. Tobacco \ncessation clinics have been set up in the general hospitals and primary healthcare centres. 12 \naddiction treatment units, methadone substitution centres, detoxification and rehabilitation \ncentres have been set up to address issues of alcohol and substance abuse in various health \n\n31 \n \ncentres across the island – Brown Sequard Mental Healthcare Centre and Montagne Longue \nHospital among others. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am also informed that there are additional measures and \nservices being provided by other Ministries, private health institutions and NGOs. The \nMinistry of Gender Equality and Family Welfare is ensuring that free pre-primary education \nis provided to children aged between three to five years. The Ministry of Labour and \nIndustrial Relations and Employment, through the Workers’ Rights Act, in addition to \nMaternity Protection Schemes encourages flexi-time arrangements. The Mauritius Family \nPlanning and Welfare Association is continuously creating awareness on declining birthrate in \nthe community through sensitisation campaign, focus groups discussions, awareness among \nyouths.  \nThe Gynaecology and Fertility Centre, which is situated in Rose Hill, is operational \nsince 05 October 2007, provides services such assisted reproductive treatment.  \nHarley Street Fertility Centre Mauritius Ltd, situated at Floréal, also provides fertility \ninvestigations and treatment. \nC-Care Fertility Clinic, located at C-Care Welkin, offers comprehensive range of \nfertility services such as in-vitro fertilization, frozen embryo transfer, intrauterine \ninsemination, etc. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, do you have one supplementary? \nMr A. Duval: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the question was addressed to the Minister of \nSocial Security to talk about the measures of Government to address the birth rate which is in \ndecline for years due to an ageing population. \nNonetheless, will the hon. Minister, although he is not the substantive Minister, \nacknowledge that direct cash transfers are internationally recognised as the most… \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Minister is replying to the question as a substantive \nMinister. \nMr A. Duval: It does not matter! It was addressed to the Minister of Social Security. \n\n32 \n \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Lasanble sa ta! \nThe Deputy Speaker: No, no, no! This is a question to be addressed by him! \nMr A. Duval: I will ask again. Will the hon. Minister acknowledge that direct cash \ntransfers are internationally regarded as the most effective incentive for low-income families, \nespecially? Countries like South Korea even pay Rs35,000 a month per family to encourage \nsame. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question! \nMr A. Duval: Can the Minister, therefore, explain why this Government has instead \nchosen to completely phase out by 2028, every existing benefit in Mauritius, namely the CSG \nIncome Allowance, the Child Allowance, the Independent Scheme Allowance… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, your question! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: …the Pregnancy Care Allowance, and the Maternity Care Allowance… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Your question! Question! \nMr A. Duval: …even reducing allowances for children with disabilities by 26%! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Jhummun: Pa ler discour la ! \nMr A. Duval: How does he… \nMr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, they have looted the country. You have not heard \nthe Prime Minister’s answer? They have bled the country white! From where are we going to \nget billions of rupees to spend? We are doing whatever is possible, whatever is humanly \npossible. I have given you a comprehensive answer to the question! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question, B/666!  \n\n33 \n \n(Interruptions) \nI have already called the question! \nMr A. Duval: No, no, no, I have a supplementary. \nThe Deputy Speaker: I have already called B/666! \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Do not argue with the Chair! \nMr A. Duval: Last time, you allowed 10 minutes to the PQ on Maradiva! You gave \nfive or six supplementaries. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The reply… \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: May I exercise my right? \nThe Deputy Speaker: You can’t challenge my ruling! \n(Interruptions) \nI have said I have already called the other question! B/666, please! \nMr A. Duval: On a point of order. \nThe Deputy Speaker: B/666! \nMr A. Duval: On what basis are you now giving… \nAn hon. Member: Asiz twa! \nThe Deputy Speaker: B/666! \nMr Bhagwan: To pa gagn drwa! \nThe Deputy Speaker: If you are not satisfied, you know what to do! You have been a \nDeputy Speaker, you know what to do if you are not satisfied with my ruling! \n\n34 \n \nMr A. Duval: No, no, no! Not at all! \nThe Deputy Speaker: B/666! \nMr A. Duval: This is highly biased! \nThe Deputy Speaker: B/666! \nMr Bhagwan: To pa gagn drwa donn lord ta!  \nThe Deputy Speaker: B/666! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Rann kas! \nMr Bhagwan: Pa gagn drwa donn lord! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Rann nou larzan! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Ms Savabaddy! \n(Interruptions) \nOrder! Order! Order! \nHon. Ms Savabaddy, B/666! \nCHILD WITH BEHAVIOURAL CONCERNS – REPORTED CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/666",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 666,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/666) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to \nChild Beyond Control, she will state the number of reported cases thereof at the level of her \nMinistry, indicating the actions taken in relation thereto and, if so, the outcome thereof.",
      "answer": "Ms Navarre-Marie: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the hon. Member may wish to note that \nthe legislation no longer provides for Child Beyond Control. If she is referring to Child with \nBehavioural Concerns, the reply is as follows. \nFrom January to June 2025, the number of cases reported to my Ministry stands at 440, \namong which, 302 children were having only mild behavioural concerns and 138 children \nwere found to be having serious behavioural concerns. \n\n35 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, cases of children having mild behavioural issues are addressed \nthrough psychological support provided to both the child and their parents by my Ministry. \nWhere appropriate, these children are placed under the Child Mentoring Scheme for further \nguidance and support. From January 2025 to date, 28 children have been placed under the \nChild Mentoring Scheme. \nWith regard to children assessed having serious behavioural concerns, they are referred \nto the Mauritius Probation and Aftercare Service, falling under the purview of the Prime \nMinister’s Office, for parenting support intervention. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, children with serious behavioural concerns should not be \ntreated as children in conflict with the law, but should be handled differently. I wish to inform \nthe House that to comply with this requirement and for a more professional and children’s \nrights-based approach in dealing with cases of CSBC, consultations are being held presently \nwith different stakeholders, including the PMO, the Ombudsperson for Children, the \nProbation and Aftercare Service, and my Ministry to come up with a proposal. The \nredesigning of the Rehabilitation Youth Centre (RYC) is also envisaged. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you.  \nThe hon. Second Member for Savanne and Black River! \nHEC-QAA(UK) AGREEMENT – ACADEMIC PROGRAMMES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/667",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 667,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research",
      "question": "(No. B/667) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research whether, in regard to the \nMemorandum of Understanding signed between the Quality Assurance Agency of the United \nKingdom and the Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Mauritius, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the HEC, information as to the date of signature thereof and the list \nof academic programmes/courses from British universities which have been approved \nsubsequent thereto.",
      "answer": "Dr. Sukon: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that the MoU between \nQA UK and the Higher Education Commission (HEC) was signed on 19 May 2025. \n\n36 \n \nI am informed by the HEC that following the signing of the MoU and further to \napplications received from four accreditation of programmes involving UK awarding bodies, \nthe Commission has been engaging in discussions with QA UK on two fronts – \n(i) \nHEC is sharing information regarding UK universities that are already \nestablished while simultaneously holding discussions with institutions \nconcerning the future programme offering, with a view to streamlining the \naccreditation process under the MoU. \nSince the signature of the MoU between HEC and QA UK, the HEC has \nprocessed accreditation applications for programmes awarded by UK \nuniversities, including Swansea University, Kingston University and Middlesex \nUniversity. \n(ii) \nThe HEC is responding to expressions of interest already received from the new \nUK universities willing to offer their programmes in Mauritius, including \nKing’s College London, University College London, London South Bank \nUniversity, which seek to deliver their programmes in Mauritius. \nThe HEC will proceed with the accreditation of these programmes under the MoU \nframework following receipt of review reports from QA UK. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, do you have a supplementary? \nMr Jugurnauth: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, can the Minister inform the House as to how \nmany accreditation criteria are being used by the Higher Education Commission to accredit \nthe programme? \nDr. Sukon: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, currently, we are using 14 criteria to accredit \nprogrammes. Following the announcement in the Budget to review the HEC Act, we are \ngoing to further streamline the procedure. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES POST OFFICES – CONDITION & AIR SHIPMENT SUSPENSION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/668",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 668,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/668) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nInformation Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in regard to the Mauritius \n\n37 \n \nPost Offices in Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information \nas to – \n(a) \nthe present state thereof and any corrective measures taken in relation thereto, and  \n(b) \nwhether the suspension of air shipment of packets and parcels to Rodrigues has \nbeen waived.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Education and Human Resource (Dr. M. Gungapersad): Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, with your permission, I will answer this PQ on behalf of the substantive \nMinister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation. \nI am informed by the Mauritius Post Ltd. that there are at present five post offices in \nRodrigues, situated at Port Mathurin, Rivière Coco, La Ferme, Grande Montagne and Mont \nLubin. \nI am further informed that the following issues in respect of the post offices have been \nreported – \n(i) \nAt Port Mathurin Post Office, waterproofing is required. \n(ii) \nAt Rivière Coco Post Office, servicing of CCTV and alarm system, dislodging \nof toilet and electrical repairs. \n(iii) \nAt La Ferme Post Office, Rodrigues Regional Assembly has been requested to \ndo needful to repair a water pump serving the whole building. \nAs regard post offices at Grande Montagne and Mont Lubin, no issues have been \nreported. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, concerning Port Mathurin Post Office, a proposal to launch a \ntender exercise in 2020 for a renovation as well as waterproofing works could not be carried \nout due to financial constraints. In 2024, a tender exercise was launched for waterproofing \nworks, but was not approved by the then management. However, the Mauritius Post Office \nLtd. is at present exploring options to address these issues by allocating funds in its 2025-\n2026 Budget for renovation of post offices. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (b) of the question, I am informed that \nfollowing a meeting held in September 2024 between Air Mauritius Ltd and Mauritius Post \nOffice Ltd, the latter issued a notice dated 18 October 2024 to inform members of the public \nthat due to the substantial increase in the volume of air parcels and packets destined to \n\n38 \n \nRodrigues and the limited cargo space on Air Mauritius flights to Rodrigues, the regular \ndespatch has been temporarily suspended.  \nHowever, the Mauritius Post Office Ltd continued to send and is still sending non-\nvoluminous packets of approximately 500g by air. As for packages for above 500g, the \nMauritius Post Office Ltd was sending same by sea. By end of January 2025, with the \ndeclining postage of parcels in Rodrigues, the Mauritius Post Office Ltd resumed sending \nparcels up to 2kg by air. Nevertheless, in May 2025, Air Mauritius Ltd informed Mauritius \nPost Office Ltd that due to weight restrictions, cargo and mail to Rodrigues could not be \nuplifted on its flights and was not accepting new bookings in order to prioritise clearance or \npending despatches. \nConsequently, the Mauritius Post Office Ltd has indicated that the suspension of \nvoluminous packages above 500g by air is being maintained. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question!  \nHon. Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka! \nSPEED CAMERAS – OPERATIONALITY – MAINTENANCE COST & \nSUPPLIERS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/669",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 669,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/669) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the speed cameras, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit, information \nas to the number of spots where same are installed, indicating – \n(a)  if they are operational;  \n(b)  the maintenance cost thereof;  \n(c)  the name of the suppliers thereof, and  \n(d)  if a survey was recently carried out to identify new spots for the installation \nthereof and, if so, when, giving details thereof and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Traffic \nManagement and Road Safety Unit that the Photographic Enforcement Device Project \nimplemented between 2012 and 2014 consists of a network of 63 fixed speed cameras \n\n39 \n \ninstalled by Proguard Ltd on public roads across the island to detect and record vehicles \nexceeding the posted speed limits of 40km per hour, 60km per hour and 80km per hour and \nalso 110km per hour, respectively.  \nThe photographs captured by these cameras are transmitted to the back office located at \nSamlo Tower, Port Louis, the seat of the TMRSU. The Photographic Enforcement Device \nUnit, operated by the Police, processes these offences and the Photographic Enforcement \nDevice Notices which is also called PEDNs are sent by post to the traffic offenders for \npayment of the appropriate fines at the court. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, concerning part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the House \nthat out of 63 speed cameras, 4 which are located at St Julien Village, Calebasses on \nMotorway M2, Brisée Verdière and Case Noyale are currently not operational. These cameras \nhave developed defects and were therefore sent to the manufacturer Truvelo (UK) Ltd for \ndiagnosis and repairs. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the \nHouse that the maintenance services for the fixed speed camera system is currently being \nprovided by the same company Proguard Ltd at an annual cost of approximately Rs27.85 \nmillion excluding VAT as Proguard Ltd is the sole representative of both the manufacturer \nTruvelo (UK) Ltd, for speed camera, and the developer Fisher Ltd, for the software in \nMauritius. The contract also caters for a yearly provisional sum of Rs3 million excluding \nVAT which is used for repairs, new spare parts and relocation of speed cameras to new sites \nso that makes it a total of Rs30.85 million per year excluding VAT which is spent on these \nspeed cameras. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard part (c) of the question, I wish to inform the House \nthat a contract for the design, supply, installation, commissioning and initial operation of \nautomatic speed enforcement cameras was awarded to Proguard Ltd in 2012.  \nRegarding part (d) of the question, I am informed that the TMRSU has carried out \nrecent surveys for the installation of speed cameras along the following hazardous locations, \nnamely – \n• Valetta by-pass B6; \n• D’Epinay along old Flacq Road B20, and  \n• Melrose along the main Road B27. \n\n40 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as announced in the Budget exercise 2025-2026 with regards \nto the use of Safe City Cameras for detection of traffic offences, the TMRSU of my Ministry \nwill initiate consultations with the Mauritius Police Force and Mauritius Telecom with a view \nto implementing this budgetary measure that seeks to enhance road safety in Mauritius. As a \nmatter of fact, a first meeting is scheduled for tomorrow 16 June 2025, I am informed. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil! \n \nPUBLIC SERVICE VEHICLE (TAXI) LICENCE – TRANSFERABILITY – \nPART-TIME TAXI DRIVER PASS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/670",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 670,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/670) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Public Service Vehicle (Taxi) Licence, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, \ninformation as to whether holders thereof have submitted thereto their concerns regarding the \n– \n(a)  transferability thereof to persons other than the legal heirs and  \n(b)  issuance of part-time taxi driver \"pass\" and, if so, indicate the measures taken in \nrelation thereto, if any.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, \nI am informed by the National Land Transport Authority that it has not received any \nrepresentation regarding the transferability of Public Service Vehicle (Taxi) License to a \nperson other than a legal heir. \nHowever, I am also given to understand that the criteria laid down by the previous \nmanagement of the NLTA to consider application for transfer of taxi licenses to persons other \nthan a legal heir are very restrictive and may have to be reviewed. Therefore, the new \nmanagement at the NLTA will work out a new set of criteria to make it easier for licenses to \nbe transferred between two unrelated parties, subject to some reasonable conditions being \nsatisfied, such as the proposed transferee having worked in the car for which a license is \nbeing transferred continuously for a period of time as full-time or part-time driver and the \nproposed transferee having a clean Certificate of Character, obviously. \n\n41 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard part (b) of the question, there was indeed a delay in \nissuing the full-time or part-time driver certificate as such applications were dealt within \nmore than 12 months by the NLTA under the previous management, therefore, penalising \nboth the taxi operators as well as the applicants for full-time or part-time driving certificate. \nHowever, as soon as the new management of the NLTA was appointed, I have requested the \nnew team to look into the streamlining of procedures for the services it was offering and one \nof them was to look into the possibility to issue a provisional certificate to applicants for part-\ntime and full-time drivers. Being given that such applications are now being processed \ndiligently in about two months instead of twelve months, the hon. Member will surely \nconquer that there is now perhaps no need to issue a provisional certificate at this point in \ntime. With additional officers posted at the Inspectorate Section of the NLTA, this time period \nwill be even shorter, given time. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is to be noted that during the month of June 2025, that is, in \none month’s time, 241 files pending since year 2021 have been cleared in respect of \napplications for transfer of PSV, contract car, contract bus, road service licenses as well as \npart-time and full-time drivers’ certificate which did not happened at the NLTA for a decade. \nThe Deputy Speaker: One supplementary! \nMr Beechook: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. I thank the hon. Minister and the \ntaxi community is certainly appreciating the way the demand for part-time passes is being \ndealt with. However, will the hon. Minister consider a reform of the system because currently, \none part-time driver can apply for a pass, but for only one vehicle. So, whether this can be \nreformed so that a pass allows him to work not only for one taxi, but for multiple taxis. This \nwill create further job opportunities for part-time and even full-time drivers? \nMr Osman Mahomed: I am not too sure what are the implications. I can discuss with \nthe officers at the NLTA with a view to giving as requested due consideration to the proposal. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nNEW SPORTS BILL & NEW ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK –– \nCONSULTATIONS – RODRIGUES SPORT COMMUNITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/671",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 671,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/671) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nYouth and Sports whether, in regard to the proposed introduction of a new administrative \nframework and a new Sports Bill, he will state where matters stand, indicating if – \n\n42 \n \n(a)  prior consultations have been or will be held with Rodrigues sports communities, \nand  \n(b)  Government is agreeable to the setting up of a special committee to make \nrecommendations on the setting up and missions of a Comité Régional \nOlympique et Sportif (CROS) for Rodrigues and, if so, when.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare (Ms A. Navarre-Marie): Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, in the absence of the substantive Minister, I am replying to this question.  \nI am informed that drafting instructions have been transmitted to the Attorney General’s \nOffice for a draft Sports Bill. Indeed, I am informed that the Ministry of Youth and Sports has \ninvited the public to submit their views and suggestions via a press communiqué for a \ncomprehensive new Sports Bill instead of piecemeal amendments to the existing legislation.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, concerning part (a) of the question, I am informed that \nsubmissions have been received from the Rodrigues Commissions for Sports. \nAdditionally, my colleague, the hon. Minister of Youth and Sports, personally, headed \na mission to Rodrigues from 06 to 10 April 2025. There, he had the opportunity to have a \nfirst-hand understanding des réalités du terrain through meetings with the Commissioner for \nSports and his officers as well as representatives of Rodriguan Regional Sports Committees.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that \nduring his mission to Rodrigues, my colleague, the hon. Minister of Youth and Sports, did \nreceive representations regarding the setting up of a Comité Régional Olympique et Sportif, \nalso known as CROS.  \nSpecific provisions have been made in the new Sports Bill in respect of Rodrigues and \ntherefore, the question of setting up a special committee does not arise.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d'Or. \nTRANSITION UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT – APPLICATIONS – PROCESSING \nTIME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/672",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 672,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/672) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to the payment of the \nTransition Unemployment Benefit, he will, for each of the years since 2020 to 2024, state the \nnumber of applications received therefor, indicating the – \n\n43 \n \n(a) \nnumber thereof approved, and  \n(b) \naverage processing time prior to disbursement, calculated from the date of \nregistration of a worker.",
      "answer": "Mr Uteem: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, section 84 of the Workers’ Rights Act stipulates \nthat – \n“A worker shall be entitled to a transition unemployment benefit where [his \nemployment is terminated by his employer] for a period of not less than one month nor \nmore than 12 months.” \nThe rate of the Transition Unemployment Benefit payable is subject to a ceiling of Rs25,475, \nas follows – \n• \nFirst three months 90% of the basic wage; \n• \nFourth to sixth month 60% of the basic wage; \n• \nSeventh to twelfth month 30% of the basic wage.  \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, the number of \napplications received and approved from 2020 to 2024, are as follows – \n• \nFor 2020 – 16,170 applications were received out of which 13,326 applications \nhad been approved; \n• \nFor 2021 – 11,264 applications were received out of which 8,930 were approved; \n• \nFor 2022 – 8,145 applications were received and 5,578 were approved; \n• \nFor 2023 – 7,264 applications were received and 4,880 were approved, and \n• \n2024 – 8,543 applications were received and 5,992 were approved.  \n \nAs regards part (b) of the question, section 84, sub-section 5 provides that – \n“Where a worker has made a claim for the payment of the transition unemployment \nbenefit and the supervising officer [of my Ministry] is satisfied that the [case] is bona \nfide, the supervising officer shall, within 7 days of the date of the claim, notify the \nMinistry [of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity] to effect \npayment.” \n\n44 \n \nThe latter has up to 10 days from receipt of claim of my Ministry to effect payment to the \nlaid-off workers. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that based on statistics retrieved from the \ncomputerised Workfare Programme system, the average time taken to process application \nfrom the date of registration of the worker on the Workfare Programme to the day the \nMinistry of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity is notified to effect \npayment is as follows – \n• \nFor 2020 – 78 days; \n• \nFor 2021 – 59 days; \n• \nFor 2022 – 58 days; \n• \nFor 2023 – 70 days, and \n• \nFor 2024 – 61 days. \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that there are several reasons for the delay to \nprocess the application within the statutory delay of seven days. Most of the delays are due to \ndelay to secure documents of information from uncooperative employers, delay from the \nworkers to submit the required documents, shortage of staff but the main reason remain, Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, that before the Supervising Officer approves the transfer, he must be \nsatisfied that the claim is bona fide and unfortunately, he undergoes a series of consultations \nwith the worker and the employer and that takes time. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am also informed that for the disbursement to be made to the \nbeneficiaries on average, the Ministry of Social Integration, Social Security and National \nSolidarity, takes an additional two weeks from the date the notification is made. The time to \nprocess the application, therefore, is up to ten times more than the statutory requirement of \nseven days. Ten times!  \nWhile the application is being processed, the worker does not receive any payment and \nthe delay in processing the application defeats the purpose of the act which is to provide the \nlaid-off worker with immediate relief.  \nIn order to bring improvement to Workfare Programme and to make it more efficient, at \nthe level of the Ministry, I have set up a technical committee. The committee also comprises \nrepresentatives of the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Social Integration, Social \nSecurity and National Solidarity.  \n\n45 \n \nI am informed that the committee has met on eight occasions and has held consultations \nwith Business Mauritius, with various trade-unions and other stakeholders and is presently \nfinalising its recommendations.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you have a supplementary?  \nMr Beejan: Thank you Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Can the hon. Minister inform the \nHouse what mechanisms or facilities are provided to officers to ensure secure and efficient \nfiles’ transportation from regional offices around the island to the Head Office? \nMr Uteem: Yes, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, what I have done when I came to office, was \nto eliminate the duplicity that occurred because previously whenever a worker made a \ncomplaint, he had to report to the Labour Office closer to his place of employment but when \nhe was laid-off, subsequently, he had to go to the Labour Officer where he is residing. \nSo, there was duplicity and there was transfer of files and this was taking a lot of delay. \nSo, now, I have given instructions that it is the same Labour Office that has registered the \ncomplaint of the worker that is now going to process the application for Workfare \nProgramme. We don’t have a new inquiry starting in with the place of residence.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: I suspend the Sitting for one and a half hour. \nAt 12.59 p.m., the Sitting was suspended.  \nOn resuming at 2.31 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Please be seated! \nHon. First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart! \nCOTTAGE-POUDRE D'OR HAMLET ROAD – ROAD SAFETY MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/673",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 673,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/673) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the road from Cottage to Poudre \nd'Or Hamlet, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Road Development \nAuthority, information as to where matters stand regarding the implementation of road safety \nmeasures thereat, including road widening works – \n(a) \nthrough compulsory acquisition, installation of pavements and handrails to \nensure pedestrian security, and \n(b) \nof the narrow and impracticable Cottage and Goodlands Branch Road, \nespecially, at the stretch where a bus recently went off-road. \n\n46",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Road Development \nAuthority that the Forbach B42 Road connects the village of Cottage to Poudre d'Or Hamlet \nover a length of 3 kms. The road width varies between 6 and 7 meters and is in general good \ncondition. Footpath has been provided along inhabited stretches wherever space and road \nreserves are available, namely over an approximate length of 1 km along the road. \nIn addition, a Works Order has been issued by the RDA to construct an additional 100m \nof footpath and drain from the Shell Filling Station towards Poudre d'Or Hamlet. Excavation \nworks have started and the works are expected to be completed by the end of August 2025. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that the \nRDA will carry out a cadastral survey to identify available spaces for future construction of \nfootpath. However, given the narrowness of the road and space constraints due to existing \nbuildup areas, it is not advised to acquire land compulsorily from numerous private owners to \nwiden the road. Footpath and handrails will, accordingly, be implemented wherever possible. \nI am also informed by the RDA that a joint site visit has been proposed with the Traffic \nManagement and Road Safety Unit to consider implementation of immediate road safety \nmeasures, pending the implementation of footpath and drains. Such measures will include \nprovision of road markings, traffic signs and cat’s-eyes. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard part (b) of the question, I am informed that the \nbranch road connecting Cottage near traffic lights to Goodlands at the level of Super U, \ncommonly known as Beau Plateau Road, is not classified, and hence, falls under the purview \nof the District Council of Rivère du Rempart. I am informed by the latter that it does not have \nthe required funding for the said project and has transmitted the request for enlargement and \ntarring of Beau Plateau Road to the National Development Unit of my Ministry for \nconsideration. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the House may note that this Government is also coming up \nwith the construction of the Motorway M4 which will start from Forbach on the Motorway \nM2. It will join the Beau Plateau Road B43 at Mapou near Vergers de Labourdonnais and will \npass through the villages of Poudre d'Or Hamlet and Espérance Trébuchet intersecting with \nthe Forbach Road B42 through a roundabout. \nThis motorway will provide a safe and alternative route for road users. Thus, lessening \nthe traffic along the Forbach B42 and Beau Plateau B43 roads and improving their overall \nsafety within the villages of Cottage and Poudre d'Or Hamlet. \n\n47 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix! \nOPSG – MALPRACTISE INVESTIGATIONS (2020-2025)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/674",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 674,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/674) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the Office of \nPublic Sector Governance, she will – \n(a) \nstate new approach adopted, if any, regarding the functioning thereof, and \n(b) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to the number of \nreports and investigation carried out over the past five financial years on public \nsector malpractice, indicating the remedial measures taken in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ms Jeetun: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that the Office of \nPublic Sector Governance (OPSG) plays a very important role in fostering good governance \nacross the public sector, including Ministries, Departments, State Owned Enterprises and \nlocal authorities.  \nIts mandate includes providing management consultancy services, conducting in-depth \nfinancial, organisational and governance reviews, and monitoring the performance of audit \ncommittees within public sector institutions mainly to ensure effective implementation of the \nrecommendations of the National Audit Office, the Public Accounts Committee and the \nInternal Control Unit. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, the OPSG is currently \nreorientating its strategic approach to better align with evolving public expectations and \ninstitutional integrity standards.  \nA key initiative being implemented during the current Financial Year 2025-2026 is the \ndevelopment of a comprehensive Code of Good Governance for the public sector. This \nframework will serve as a unifying standard across public sector institutions with the \nobjective of enhancing transparency and accountability, reinforcing ethical conduct and \ncompliance, and elevating the overall effectiveness of service delivery in public sector \norganisations. \nThe Code is expected to strengthen systematic safeguards, instil a culture of \nresponsibility, and restore public trust in the leadership and management of the public sector.  \n\n48 \n \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, over the last five financial years, the OPSG has \ncompleted a total of 46 reviews covering areas such as finance, procurement, human \nresources and governance as follows – \n• \n2020-2021: 7 reports. \n• \n2021-2022: 10 reports. \n• \n2022-2023: 14 reports. \n• \n2023-2024: 10 reports. \n \nFor the Financial Year 2024-2025, five reports have been completed and issued, and \nfour are in process of being finalised. It is to be noted that the five reviews that have been \ncompleted for the Financial Year 2024-2025, the OPSG undertook assignments which were of \na more complex nature and with wider scope, requiring more time to complete. \nIn addition, during the same financial year, the OPSG has been conducting governance \nsurveys in 34 statutory bodies to assess compliance with the eight principles enshrined in the \nNational Code of Corporate Governance for Mauritius. So far, 14 statutory bodies have been \nissued and assessed, and a governance report has been issued to them. \nAs regards to remedial measures, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House \nthat the OPSG analyses and examines the issues, the shortcomings of the organisations \nreviewed, and subsequently, proposes workable recommendations for improvement with \nrespect to governance lapses, inefficiencies and potential malpractices in public institutions. \nThe responsibility to effectively implement the recommendations rests with the \norganisations, the Ministries, the departments for which OPSG conducted the reviews, and \nthe implementation of these measures are monitored by the respective audit committees set \nup at the level of the Ministries or departments. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the OPSG operates on a demand-driven basis and its report is \nsubmitted exclusively to the requesting authority. Nevertheless, I wish to assure the House \nthat where deficiencies are identified, OPSG recommendations are aimed at systematic \nrectification and capacity building. These typically include strengthening of internal controls, \nthe revision of governance framework, and the clarification of reporting lines, including \nenhanced monitoring mechanism. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Lobine! \n\n49 \n \nMr Lobine: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. May I ask the hon. Minister, with \nregard to the annual report of the Office of Public Sector Governance, can she confirm to the \nHouse that as at date, we only have the annual report of 2016-2017 that is available for the \npublic to consult? \nDr. Ms Jeetun: Thank you for the additional question. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. I have \nbeen informed that this department was previously called the Management Audit Office and \nthey used to publish their annual reports as an entity.  \nSince 2019, they have been transferred to as a department under the Ministry, and since \nthen, the report of the Ministry includes the affairs of the OPSG. Since 2019, they are \nincluded in the annual report of the Ministry. \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Hon. First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE! \nBEL AIR RIVIÈRE SÈCHE – PUBLIC TOILET PROJECT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/675",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 675,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/675) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Village of Bel Air Rivière \nSèche, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Bel Air Rivière Sèche Village \nCouncil operating under the aegis of the Flacq District Council, information as to whether \nthere is a project for the setting up of public toilet.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that there is \ncurrently no public toilet block operated by the Council in the centre of Bel Air Rivière \nSèche. However, a public toilet block managed by the Council is available at the new Bel Air \nmarket fair which is situated on the outskirt of the village. \nI am informed that there are private toilets facilities within the commercial complex \nhousing the Save Mart supermarket which is centrally located in the village. These however, \nare not under the jurisdiction of the Council and are intended for customers of the \ncommercial premises. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, following numerous requests from the public and in \nrecognition of the inconvenience caused by the absence of a public toilet block in the centre \nof the village, I wish to inform the House that the St Esprit Parish has agreed in principle to \nthe proposal. Discussions are currently ongoing and the Council has given its commitment to \nset up a toilet facility on the Church premises subject to the final agreement with the Parish \nauthority. \n\n50 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien. \nJAWAHARLAL NEHRU HOSPITAL – CARDIAC EMERGENCIES – SAMU",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/676",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 676,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/676) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness  whether, in regard to Acute Cardiac Emergencies, \nhe will state the number of patients referred from the SAMU of the Jawaharlal Nehru \nHospital to the Cardiac Catheterisation Laboratory of Victoria Hospital in relation thereto \nover the past five years, indicating the number thereof who were refused emergency \nintervention thereat and the reasons given to the SAMU by the doctors thereat, in each case.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Acute Cardiac Emergencies are second life-\nthreatening conditions that require immediate medical attention and if not treated promptly, \nthese emergencies can lead to severe complications. In this respect the Service d’Aide \nMedicale Urgente (SAMU) provide on-site free medical treatment and stabilises critical and \nvital emergency during transport aligning with the golden hour concept which is the quickest \ntimeframe to transfer patients to hospitals. \nThe SAMU also handles secondary inter-hospital transfers for CT-scans, MRIs and \nprimarily, rescue percutaneous coronary intervention, a minimally invasive procedure used to \nopen blocked or narrowed coronary arteries which improves blood flow to the heart. \nThe SAMU 24/7 control room at Victoria Hospital currently manages approximately \n2000 calls daily, utilising an efficient triage and logistics system and vital emergencies \nincluding myocardial infarction in all five regional hospitals. Myocardial infarction is caused \nby decreased or complete cessation of blood flow to the portion of the muscle of the heart. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that my Ministry is making \nprovision for setting up of a trauma unit headed by emergency physicians in all regional \nhospitals to handle severe injuries and life-threatening emergencies. \nThese units will provide immediate comprehensive care to patients having critical \ninjuries from accidents and other traumatic incidents. I am informed that over the past five \nyears, SAMU services based at Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital, Rose Belle, has referred 170 \npatients of which 41 patients were accepted for urgent primary percutaneous coronary \nintervention to the Cardiac Catheterisation Laboratory of Victoria Hospital. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that for period 2021 to date, 129 \ncases which were supposed to be undertaken have presently been given the appropriate \n\n51 \n \ntreatment of thrombolysis with tenecteplase in the SAMU ambulance itself. This medication \ndissolve blood clots for such cases. The patients were then admitted for appropriate follow-up \ntreatment and care. \nI wish to inform the House that since Government took office, necessary has been made \nfor a Cath-lab at Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital and same will be operational within one month \ntime. During the last 10 years, there has been no increase in the number of ambulances and I \nam informed that currently 8 ambulances and 6 SAMU are awaiting repairs.  \nTherefore, I wish to inform the House that this Government is taking strong initiatives \nto renew these ambulances and SAMU vehicles and as such six new vehicles are expected to \nupgrade the services. \nMoreover, I wish to inform the House that much efforts are being made to streamline \nthe coordination between the SAMU services and the cardiac units so as to minimise delays \nand improve outcome for cardiac emergency cases for the benefits of the population. \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Yes, hon. Dr. Prayag! \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, hon. Minister. 41 cases have been catered for out of 170 cases, \nwhich is not adequate in cases of emergency percutaneous coronary interventions. Maybe \nlater the Minister could provide the House with information about the number that have been \nrefused, and also the reasons for the refusal of interventions? Thank you. \nMr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have mentioned that 170 patients were referred \nout of which 41 patients were accepted for urgent primary percutaneous coronary \nintervention to the Cardiac Catheterisation Laboratory. The remaining 129, have been taken \nurgently and were given appropriate treatment – they were not rejected – of thrombolysis. I \nam not a doctor myself but, I am made to understand that our ICU units, SAMU, they are \nthemselves, moving ICUs throughout the country. They undertake all urgent actions that need \nto be taken, that were taken and care was given to those patients. \nI have also mentioned that we are going to acquire more SAMU vans so that we can \ncater for the needs of more patients. \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Hon. First Member for Montagne Blanche and GRSE! \n \n \n\n52 \n \nBEL AIR RIVIÈRE SÈCHE, ST MICHELLE & ERNEST FLORENT – \nFOOTBALL PITCHES – REINSTATEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/677",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 677,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/677) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the football pitches in the \nVillages of Bel Air Rivière Sèche, St Michelle and Ernest Florent, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain information as to whether consideration will be given for the reinstatement \nthereof and for provision of lighting facilities thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: I wish to provide a detailed update regarding the status of football \nground under the purview of Flacq District Council. The Bel Air Rivière Sèche football \nground which covers an area of 6400 m2 was cleared on Friday, 11 July 2025. I am pleased to \nreport that the lighting system on this ground is currently fully operational. \n However, it is important to note that the perimeter fencing has been damaged and the \ncost estimate for the necessary repairs is around Rs1.8 million and the Council is in the \nprocess of securing financial clearance to proceed with these works. \nWith regard to the St Michelle football ground which spans 7650 m², maintenance \nworks were undertaken on Friday, 11 July 2025. Unfortunately, the lighting system at this \nground was vandalised during March and April 2025. The required accessories and materials \nfor repair have already been procured and the repairs works are expected to be completed by \n28 July 2025.To mitigate future act of vandalism, the installation of overhead wiring for the \nlighting system is under consideration. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, regarding the Ernest Florent football ground which has an area \nof 6656 m2, clearing works were also completed on the 11 July 2025.  \nAt present, 6 out of the 12 floodlights are not functional. The District Council of Flacq \nhas informed that repair works will be carried out using in-house labour with completion \nscheduled for 07 August 2025. Routine maintenance of all football grounds is conducted on a \nmonthly basis by the Council to ensure the facilities remain in good condition.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it has come to my attention that certain local authorities tend \nto act swiftly on maintenance and upgrading works only after a Parliamentary Question have \nbeen submitted regarding their jurisdictions. This reactive approach raises serious concerns \nregarding the commitment to proactive services delivery.  \n\n53 \n \nRegrettably, over the recent years, the quality of governance and public service within \nsome local authorities have declined. This situation is largely attributed to a culture of \ncomprehensive and a lack of accountability on the part of a few officers. The legacy of \nneglect and the indifference under the previous administration has undermined public trust \nand service standards, and its consequences are still being felt today. \nAs previously stated in my PQ B/382 on 15 April 2025, disciplinary proceedings will \nbe initiated against officers of Local Authorities who have failed to carry out their duties \nresponsibly. The \nGovernment \nremains \nfully \ncommitted \nto \nrestoring \ndiscipline, \nprofessionalism and accountability within the public service and will not tolerate negligence \nof duty by any public officer entrusted to serve the public. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka! \nFUTSAL - SYNTHETIC FOOTBALL PITCHES – CONSTRUCTION & \nMAINTENANCE COSTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025",
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/678",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 678,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/678) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the synthetic football pitches, \nalso known as “futsal”, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the \nnumber thereof constructed and operational island-wide, indicating – \n(a) \nthe number thereof falling under the purview of his Ministry and/or under that of \nother public entities, further indicating the construction and maintenance costs of \nthe ones constructed since 2015 to 2024; \n(b) \nthe reported number of cases of severe physical injuries sustained by players \nusing same, and  \n(c) \nif consideration will be given for the replacement of synthetic football pitches by \nnatural football pitches for safety reasons.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare (Mrs A. Navarre-Marie): Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that there is a significant difference between pitches used \nto play futsal and other variations of football. Futsal is usually played indoors on a hard court, \ntypically wooden or synthetic. On the other hand, synthetic pitches designed to mimic natural \ngrass, offering an environment friendly space for running and tackling, are utilised to play \nother variations of football such as normal or small-sided games. \n\n54 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Ministry of Youth and Sports is not a licensing nor a \nregulatory authority for such infrastructures. Therefore, the Ministry does not keep data on \nthe number of synthetic football pitches or futsal which have been constructed and that are \noperational around the island. Nevertheless, the Ministry has sought information from Local \nAuthorities as construction permits are issued by them. Information is being compiled and \nwill be tabled later. \nAs regards part (a) of the question, I am informed that the St François Xavier Stadium \nin Port Louis which falls under the purview of the Ministry of Youth and Sports is equipped \nwith synthetic grass and managed by the Mauritius Sports Council. I am further informed that \nthe Mauritius Sports Council operates and maintains ten multiuse games area, commonly \nknown as MUGA which was constructed by the Mauritius Telecom Foundation. These \nfacilities include small synthetic football pitches. The costs of the construction and \nmaintenance of the facilities are also being compiled. Maintaining a synthetic football pitch \ninvolves regular cleaning, infill maintenance and periodic deep cleaning to ensure optimal \nplaying conditions and longevity. This includes removing debris and weeds if any, brushing \nthe turf, checking and replenishing infill levels and addressing any wear and tear.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to synthetic football pitches falling under the \npurview of public entities, as already indicated, the Ministry of Youth and Sports has sought \nthe necessary information from Local Authorities.  \nRegarding part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Mauritius Sports Council that \nthere are no reported cases of physical injuries sustained by users of the ten MUGAs or at St \nFrançois Xavier Stadium.  \nWith regard to part (c) of the question, I wish to inform the House that the Ministry of \nYouth and Sports does not intend to replace its existing synthetic pitch at St François Xavier \nStadium with a natural one. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Just for the record, hon. Minister, you are the Ag. Minister of \nSports? \nMs Navarre-Marie: Yes. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, you replied to the question. No supplementary. The hon. \nThird Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue! \n\n55 \n \nPORT LOUIS MUNICIPAL COUNCIL – GREEN SPACES, CHILDREN’S \nPLAYGROUNDS & PUBLIC GARDENS – ENHANCEMENT & SPONSORSHIP",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/679",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 679,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/679) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to green spaces, \nchildren’s playgrounds and public gardens falling under the aegis of the Municipal City \nCouncil of Port Louis, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Council, the list \nthereof presently being maintained and embellished by private companies and, if not, if \nconsideration will be given to seek sponsors from private companies therefor.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Municipal City Council of \nPort Louis that there are currently 79 green spaces, 9 public gardens and 44 children’s \nplayground under its jurisdiction. These sites are maintained and embellished by the \nCouncil’s in-house workforce. For the information of the House, I am tabling the list of these \namenities. \nThe proposal made by the hon. Member to seek sponsorship for the upkeep and \nenhancement of these public spaces is most welcomed. Over the past two years, the Council \nhas benefited from private sponsorship; notably in August 2023, Livestock Feed Ltd provided \nfour litter bins and four benches for the green space opposite Pailles SSS at a cost of \nRs64,000. In June 2025, the Rotary Club of Montebello Pailles funded the renovation of play \nequipment at the Montebello Children’s Playground amounting to Rs67,000. So far, the City \nClinic has positively responded to a request from my Ministry and has also sent a proposal \nfor the embellishment and maintenance of the Plaine Verte Garden. \nFurthermore, I am informed that in principle, the Council has no objection to private \nsponsorship for the maintenance and embellishment of green spaces, public gardens and \nchildren’s playgrounds, provided such initiatives are submitted for formal approval at the \nCouncil’s meeting. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes!  \nPALMA DISPENSARY – RENOVATION/RELOCATION DETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/680",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 680,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/680) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the dispensary at Palma, he \nwill state if consideration will be given for the renovation or relocation thereof and, if so, \nindicate when, giving details thereof and, if not, why not. \n\n56",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that Palma Community Health \nCentre stands on a plot of land of 15 perches which was donated by the Municipal Council of \nQuatre Bornes in the year 1988. My Ministry initiated action for the renovation of Palma \nCommunity Health Centre and following a bidding exercise, the contract for renovation and \nextension works was awarded to a contractor on 4 September 2023. However, in October \n2023, the Ministry of National Infrastructure informed my Ministry not to proceed with the \nhanding over of the site to the contractor as the Road Development Authority was envisaging \nthe realignment of the road passing very close to the existing Community Health Centre \nbuilding. This would severely affect the usage of the existing building and render it non-\nfunctional. Consequently, in view of major roadworks in that area, construction works on the \nnew proposed design of the community health centre could not be implemented. \nIn order to provide a modern state-of-the-art facility to the inhabitants of Palma region, \nmy Ministry is liaising with the Ministry of Housing and Lands, the Ministry of National \nInfrastructure and the Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit for either the acquisition or \nvesting of a new plot of land in that area for the construction of a new community health \ncentre. In the meantime, I can assure the hon. Member that all mitigating measures will be \nundertaken to see to it that the place is safe for those who will come there. \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Yes, your question? \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, M. le président. Je remercie le ministre pour sa \nréponse. Pending completion of procedures related to the land, will the Minister inform the \nHouse whether, urgent works could be undertaken such as installing main courantes on the \nfront step of the dispensary and the toilet? Furthermore, if a solution can be considered to \nseparate the pharmacy from patient consultations currently taking place in the same room? \nThank you. \nMr Bachoo: I have already mentioned that mitigating measures will be undertaken and \nI can assure the hon. Member that by next week, we can have a site visit so that we can have \na proper look at the building and take whatever decision needs to be taken. \nMs Anquetil: Thank you! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do let me know when you intend to go to the site visit. \nThe Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka! \n \n\n57 \n \nTUNA FISHING INDUSTRY – REVENUE OBTAINED – 2019-2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/681",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 681,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/681) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the tuna fishing industry, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as \nto the revenue obtained by the Mauritius Government therefrom over the period 2019 to \n2024, giving details thereof and indicating in which forms same is received.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, hon. Member. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to the first part of the question, the total revenue \nobtained by the government in respect of the tuna fishing industry for the period 2019-2024 \namounts to Rs537,516,875. The revenue derived is from payment of the following – \n• \nLicence fees of Rs382 million by 780 registered fishing vessels, and \n• \nTonnage fee of Rs156 million by foreign-owned Mauritian flag fishing vessels \nexporting tuna and tuna-like fish species. \nI am informed that the 780 licences were issued to the following categories of fishing \nvessels – \n(i) \n294 licences to fishing vessels under the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership \nAgreement with the European Union; \n(ii) \n105 licences to fishing vessels under the Mauritius-Seychelles Reciprocal Fishing \nAgreement; \n(iii)  311 licences to fishing vessels not under any fishing agreement, and \n(iv)  \n70 licences to Mauritians semi-industrial fishing vessels. \nThe tonnage fee was paid by foreign-owned Mauritian flag vessels operating in \nindustrial tuna fishery, exporting tuna and tuna-like fish species. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am tabling detailed information on the 780 fishing licences \nissued to fishing vessels and revenue derived therefrom as well as the applicable tonnage fee \nfor the period 2019-2024. \n\n58 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to the second part of the question, the form in \nwhich the revenue was obtained in respect of the tuna fishing industry is mostly through bank \ntransfer. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \nMINOR B.C.G.A.L. – INVALID BASIC PENSION – DISCONTINUATION CAUSE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/682",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 682,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/682) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \nwhether, in regard to minor B. C. G. A. L., he will state the reasons why the Invalid’s Basic \nPension to which he was entitled was discontinued when he proceeded for overseas \ntreatment.",
      "answer": "Mr Subron: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that in accordance \nwith Section 8 National Pensions Act 1976, the criteria for someone to benefit from an \nInvalid’s Basic Pension is that the person should suffer from a disability of at least 60% \nwhich is likely to last for a period of at least 12 months, and he should be under the age of 60 \nyears. \nFirst, let me inform my colleague of the Constituency Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue that it would be inexact to state that the Invalid’s Basic Pension to which the minor, \nB.C.G.A.L., was entitled was discontinued when he proceeded for overseas treatment. \nAs a matter of fact, I am informed that a claim for Invalid’s Basic Pension in favour of \nthe minor was made on 23 May 2024. He was convened for medical assessment on 04 July \n2024, 04 September 2024 and 05 November 2024, but he did not attend the Medical Board. \nConsequently, he was reconvened for medical assessment by the Medical Board on 16 \nDecember 2024.  \nOn 27 January 2025, he was recommended for the Invalid’s Basic Pension for one year \nwith effect from May 2024, date of application, to April 2025. The first payment of \nRs169,000 was made by cheque on 03 February 2025, representing payment from May 2024 \nto February 2025. \n\n59 \n \nI am further informed that the minor was reboarded for renewal of the Invalid’s Basic \nPension on 14 May 2025 and same has not been recommended by the Medical Board. \nFollowing a disallowance notice issued to the minor, an appeal was filed on 16 June 2025 and \nthe Medical Appeal Tribunal hearing has been scheduled for 23 July 2025. \nAs a matter of fact, I am also informed by the Ministry of Health that the first overseas \ntreatment of the minor to Chennai was on 21 June 2024 and the second overseas treatment \nwas from 21 February 2025 to 08 March 2025. All the cost of the treatment was covered by \nthe Government.  \nFrom the above chronology, it is clear that despite the fact that the minor had his \noverseas treatment on 21 June 2024, he was paid his Invalid’s Basic Pension for one year \nwith effect from May 2024. In addition, while he was abroad from 21 February 2025 to 08 \nMarch 2025, he was also paid his BIP for this period. \nLet me add that I have paid two visits to the mother, the minor and the family, to verify \nthe facts stated above, and to extend this Government’s compassion to the minor and the \nfamily. In parallel, myself and activists in the region have ensured solidarity actions to help \nthe minor and his family.  \nFurthermore, given that this case is considered a hardship case by the National \nEmpowerment Foundation, it has been decided to allocate a proper NHDC housing to the \nfamily and the minor.  \nMy dear hon. colleague can rest assured that I, as a caring Member of the National \nAssembly, representing Constituency No.4, and as a caring Minister of a caring and \nresponsible Government, we will always display kindness and humanism and assume our \nresponsibility towards our fellow citizens’ wellbeing and dignity. \nThank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, do you have one supplementary? \nMs Savabaddy: Merci, M. le président. Merci à mon collègue ministre pour la réponse. \nComme vous le savez, c’est un cas très déchirant. Le ministre et son personnel, comme il \nvient de le dire, ont attendu que je dépose cette interpellation parlementaire pour visiter cette \nenfant. \n\n60 \n \nJe pose la question tout de suite. L’honorable ministre conviendra-t-il avec moi que ce \ncas n’est qu’un des nombreux cas où le personnel de son ministère fait preuve d’un manque \nde compassion et d’humanité ? Que fera-t-il pour que les personnes en détresse n’aient pas à \nsubir une telle humiliation dans l’avenir, tout comme le cas du bébé B.C.G.A.L. ? Merci. \nMr Subron: I refer my colleague to the Statement I made to the National Assembly at \nthe last session to address the various issues that prevailed during the last 10 years and to \naddress them with deep and profound reforms that this Government will be bringing to the \nlaw in regulating and determining invalid’s pensions and benefits. The change will come. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or! \nBLUE WORLD EXPLORER LTD. – DIVING ACCIDENT – INQUIRY & \nREMEDIAL ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/683",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 683,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. B/683) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Tourism whether, in regard to the recent accident that occurred in a diving \ncentre in the north of the island, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \n– \n(a) \nwhether an inquiry has been carried out thereinto and the outcome thereof,  \n(b) \nremedial actions taken, if any, in relation to the suspected cause thereof, and  \n(c) \nthe measures taken, if any, to accompany family members of the victim thereof.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Energy and Public Utilities (Mr P. Assirvaden): M. le président, \navec votre permission, je vais répondre à cette question. \nJe suis informé que Blue World Explorer Ltd. est le centre de plongée où s’est produit \nle 20 mars 2025 le malheureux incident au cours duquel Monsieur B.D. a perdu la vie. \nLe centre de plongée a obtenu une licence d’entreprise touristique le 23 décembre 2024 \npour exercer ses activités de plongée sous-marine à l’hôtel Le Méridien après avoir rempli les \nconditions suivantes – \n(a) \nautorisation de la Mauritius Scuba Diving Association ; \n(b) \nconformité aux normes établies par la MSDA pour une telle activité ; \n\n61 \n \n(c) \nvalidité de permis de plaisance attachés au centre de plongée, et \n(d) \ncouverture d’assurance pour tous les employés travaillant pour la société. \nM. le président, immédiatement après avoir été informé de l’incident, deux agents de \nl’office du tourisme se sont rendus sur place pour établir un rapport préliminaire. Ils ont \nindiqué que Monsieur B.D. était décédé suite à de multiples blessures après l’explosion. Son \ndécès a été confirmé par un médecin de la Clinique du Nord. La police a ouvert une enquête.  \nLes responsables de l’autorité du tourisme ont également indiqué que la licence du \ncentre de plongée était valable jusqu’au 23 décembre 2025, tandis que celle du bateau de \nplaisance était valable jusqu’au 27 août 2025. Les activités se déroulaient conformément aux \nprotocoles établis. De plus, tous les employés du centre de plongée étaient couverts par une \npolice d’assurance. Néanmoins, compte tenu du décès signalé à la suite de l’accident, les \nactivités du centre de plongée de l’hôtel Le Méridien et le permis de navigation de plaisance \nont été suspendus en attendant la conclusion de l’enquête policière.  \nEn réponse à la partie (a) de la question, je suis informé que, s’agissant d’un accident \nsurvenu sur un lieu de travail, le ministère du Travail et des relations industrielles a ouvert \nune enquête afin d’identifier les causes profondes. Je crois savoir que l’enquête est en cours.  \nLe ministère, M. le président, attend les résultats de l’enquête de la police et du \nministère du Travail pour prendre des mesures appropriées concernant la licence su centre de \nplongée. \n M. le président, en ce qui concerne la partie (b) de la question, afin d’éviter que de tels \nincidents malheureux se reproduisent, le ministère, entre autres, a mis en place une squad – \n• pour conduire des visites surprises pour les opérateurs disposant d’une licence \nd’entreprise touristique auprès de l’autorité du tourisme pour les centres de \nplongée ; \n• identifier si les opérateurs adhèrent aux normes établies et s’assurer que leurs \néquipements complémentaires sont en bon état de fonctionnement. \n\n62 \n \nM. le président, des instructions ont été également données au Tourism Authority \nd’appliquer strictement les dispositions des lois et règlementations existantes, et d’assurer une \nsuivie étroite de tous les titulaires de permis. \nM. le président, enfin, en réponse à la partie (c) de la question, je dois dire que \nl’autorité du Tourisme suit de près cette affaire et avec la compagnie d’assurance du centre de \nplongée et la conclusion de l’enquête policière, le nécessaire sera fait. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka! \nQUARTIER MILITAIRE – ST MARTIN DAM LEISURE PARK PROJECT – \nCONTRACTOR & FUNDS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/684",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 684,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/684) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the St Martin Dam Leisure \nPark project in Quartier Militaire, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nDistrict Council of Moka, information as to – \n(a)  the names of the contractor/s involved therein, indicating the quantum of funds \npaid to each in respect of works carried out;  \n(b)  if the Council supplied materials therefor and, if so, give details thereof, and  \n(c)  the expected completion date thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as highlighted in my previous reply to \nParliamentary Question B/489 on 13 May 2025, the St Martin Dam Leisure Park project at \nQuartier Militaire was approved during the Financial Year 2017-2018 under the previous \nadministration. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this project has been marked by poor planning, fragmented \nexecution strategy and questionable procurement practices by the former government. Instead \nof adopting a streamline and transparent design and build model, which would have ensured \nbetter coordination, timely delivery and cost control, the previous administration split the \nproject into multiple components. These were awarded to various contractors through \ndifferent procurement methods including sales quotations, restricted bidding, direct \nprocurement and open advertised bidding. This fragmented approach has compromised \nefficiency, escalated cost unnecessarily, and caused prolonged delays as the former \nadministration kept on increasing the scope of work with  \n\n63 \n \ntime, and the project has still not yet been completed despite it started eight years ago. \nI have been informed that a preliminary assessment conducted by the District Council \nof Moka on 19 May 2025 revealed several defects and discrepancies in the completed \ninfrastructural works and incomplete landscaping. In response, the District Council has \ninitiated actions against defaulting contractors, including forfeiting retention money, \nconducting performance reviews and initiating procedures to suspend or debar those who \nhave not met satisfactory standards. \nAs regards to part (a) of the question, I am tabling the list of all contractors involved \nand the payments made to each of them.  \nAlso, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am apprised that the contractors were \nprovided with materials for implementing the works. I am also tabling the list of materials \nsupplied by the District Council of Moka to the contractors.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard to part (c) of the question, I wish to assure the House \nthat the District Council of Moka has been instructed to complete its survey on all \noutstanding works and that the project be completed before the end of this year. \nThank you.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \nMAURITIUS DIPLOMATIC MISSIONS OVERSEAS – REMUNERATIONS & \nALLOWANCES – ANNUAL OPERATION COSTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/685",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 685,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade",
      "question": "(No. B/685) Mr A. Duval \n(Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade \nwhether, in regard to Mauritius Diplomatic Missions Overseas, he will state – \n(a)  the number thereof currently in operation, indicating the names of the heads \nthereof, giving details as to the remunerations and allowances paid thereto, \nwhether in cash or in kind;  \n(b)  the annual operation costs incurred in respect of each such mission over the past \nfinancial year, including rental charges and other staff-related expenses, and  \n\n64 \n \n(c)  whether any reduction in the number thereof is being envisaged, and, if not, why \nnot.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries (Dr. A. Boolell): Mr Deputy Speaker, I am standing for the substantive Minister for Foreign Affairs \non overseas mission. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Republic of Mauritius is represented world-wide through a \nnetwork of nineteen diplomatic missions, one consulate general and one consulate. These \noverseas missions are an integral part of the Ministry and are headed by an Ambassador/High \nCommissioner or a Counsel.  \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am hereby tabling the information on the \nnumber of missions currently in operation with the names of the heads. There are currently \nthree Ambassadors in post and the other missions are being headed by diplomats acting as \nChargé d’affaire. With regard to details of the remuneration and allowances paid, they are \ngoverned by the PRB Report. \nWith respect to part (b) of the question, I am tabling the annual operation cost incurred \nin respect of each mission over the past financial year including rental charges and other staff \nrelated expenses. \nWith regard to part (c) of the question, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Government does \nnot envisage to have any reduction in the number of missions. With the current geopolitical \nsituation, Government is focussing on enhancing its bilateral relations worldwide and use of \nour diplomatic missions to explore further trade, investment and investment opportunities, \ntechnology transfer and capacity building in line with our Government Programme and the \nparameters of our Budget. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, rather than reducing the number of missions, we are \nmaximising efficiency, reducing unnecessary expenditure and making optimal use of \nresources. \nMr A. Duval: May I ask the hon. Minister, although he is not the substantive Minister, \nbut speaking of efficiency, whether a study has been made recently or is available with \nregards to certain minor embassies such as those in terms of activity, whether these \nembassies, these missions are efficient and whether their model of functioning should be \n\n65 \n \nreview? These are, amongst others, Berlin, Moscow, Kuala Lumpur and Maputo. So, is there \nsuch a study on the efficiency of those four embassies including maybe others as well? \nDr. Boolell: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, size doesn’t mean that they are not efficient. In \nfact, they are delivering and delivering to the best of abilities to serve the interest of our \nnation. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien! \nMARE D’ALBERT, RÉSIDENCE HORTENSIA – UNOCCUPIED NHDC \nHOUSING UNITS – MAINTENANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/686",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 686,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/686) Mr G. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the Résidence Hortensia at \nMare d’Albert, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Housing \nDevelopment Company Ltd., information as to – \n(a)  the number of unoccupied housing units thereat and  \n(b)  who is responsible for the maintenance thereof in the absence of a syndic.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Thank you. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the NHDC Housing Estate at \nMare d’Albert known as Résidence Hortensia was completed in April 2024 and delivered to \nthe eligible beneficiaries as from the end of May 2024. The housing estate comprises 203 \nunits of ground plus one in a row type configuration. \nWith regards to part (a), I am informed by the NHDC that to date, out of the 203 \nhousing units, 181 are occupied, 2 housing units have not yet been allocated as the initial \nbeneficiaries have declined the offer and 20 beneficiaries are currently carrying out fit out \nand external improvement works prior to moving into their houses. \nAs regards part (b), given that the housing units at Résidence Hortensia are individually \nowned, the housing estate is not governed by a règlement de copropriété and thus, there is no \nsyndic. The residents are responsible for the upkeep and maintenance of their property.  \nThe NHDC has in March 2025 requested the District Council of Grand Port to take \nover the Multipurpose Hall and the commercial space at Résidence Hortensia. The previous \ngovernment had not made any preparations whatsoever with regards to those particular \nissues. A reply is now awaited from the relevant District Council and my good friend, the \nMinister of Local Government, has been made aware of same. In the meantime, the NHDC is \n\n66 \n \nensuring the maintenance of the green spaces, children’s playground and the other shared \nfacilities and amenities.  \nAllow me to add, however, that this is the way that things were planned by the previous \nregime. However, I am of the view that it is the responsibility and it should be the \nresponsibility of the Local Authority to maintain the children’s playground as well as the \nother facilities there, but it is also the responsibility, once the internal roads of any such estate \nis declared public, that it is and should be the responsibility of the Local Authority to \nmaintain the roads and to clean the places because there are too many places that are not \nbeing maintained by the Local Authorities. The reason being so is that the previous regime \nhas tried to remove them from the ambit of the responsibility of the Local Authorities. So, if \nwe are to work together as a team, we will be able to manage all those problems. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Apollon! \nMr Apollon: Yes, thank you to my colleague the Minister. As there is a Social Welfare \nHall in this residence which has never been opened for the inhabitants, can the hon. Minister \nsee if needful can be done so that these people can have social community activities? \nMr Mohamed: The whole idea of that particular Multipurpose Hall is precisely for the \nresidents to use. There is therefore, in my humble view, even though the previous \ngovernment had decided that there shall be no syndic within such a property, I am of the view \nand logic dictates that there should be a syndic. If there is no syndic, who will maintain the \nMultipurpose Hall? Because it is only for access to the residents of that place. \nSo, there should be a syndic and the syndic and all, and I take advantage of this, Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, to pass a very important message, is that not only are we trying to \nrevamp and reform the whole idea of managing and maintaining those residential estates, \nNHDC, NSLD but we have to continue with the new scheme that we are coming up with, \nmentioned in the budget. But people with a syndic, have to take the responsibility of \ncontributing. A majority of them does but it is important to everyone; if they will get good \nservice, they will surely pay. \nThank you.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Next question. Hon. Third Member for Port-Louis North and \nMontagne Longue. \n \n\n67 \n \nKOREK! MOBILE APP – FEATURES AND SERVICES AVAILABLE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/687",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 687,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/687) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation \nwhether, in regard to the new Government Mobile App KOREK!, he will state the \nGovernment services and documents that will be available through same, indicating if the \nsaid services will also be available on a dedicated portal for each user on the website.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Education and Human Resources (Dr. M. Gungapersad):  Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, with your permission, I will reply to this PQ on behalf of my colleague, \nthe substantive Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation.    \nI thank the hon. Member for showing such enthusiasm regarding the Mobile App \nKOREK! Let me inform the House that this new app is still at its conception stage. \nConsultations are ongoing regarding both the features of KOREK! and the services that will \nbe available thereon.  \nAt this stage, only the name, logo and tagline of the mobile app have been reserved \nwith the Industrial Property Office of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration \nand International Trade. Once this app KOREK! is ready, it is only then that it will be correct \nfor the Ministry to provide ample information about same.  \nThank you.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, you have a question? \nMr Caserne: May I ask the hon. Minister whether there are measures that are being \nconsidered to encourage the members of society to get registered with the new application? \nDr. Gungapersad:  Yes. I think the substantive Minister will take charge of that.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart. \nPUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS – FOREIGN STUDENTS’ \nENROLMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/688",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 688,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research",
      "question": "(No. B/688) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research whether, in regard to public higher \neducation institutions, he will state the – \n\n68 \n \n (a)  number of overseas students enrolled therein in each case since 2015 to 2024, \nindicating the number thereof currently enrolled in undergraduate and \npostgraduate programmes and their countries of origin, and  \n(b) \nmeasures being implemented by his Ministry with a view to attracting more \nstudents.",
      "answer": "Dr. Sukon: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard part (a) of the question, which \nrequires detailed statistical information, I am proposing, with your permission, to table this \npart of the answer.  \nRegarding part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that in line with \ngovernment’s vision as stated in Government Programme 2025-2029, which positions \nMauritius as a globally competitive and vibrant higher education hub, my Ministry, in \ncollaboration with the various institutions operating under its aegis, has initiated focused \nactions to develop appropriate strategies for promoting Mauritius as a destination of choice \nfor higher education. \nMy Ministry has established three national committees which are tasked with \nformulating recommendation and implementable actions to attract more international students \nto Mauritius. The committees are namely, Internationalisation of Higher Education, Branding \nand Marketing of Higher Education, and Study in Mauritius Platform.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, these committees, following extensive consultations with \nvarious stakeholders, presented their findings and recommendations at the Higher Education \nSummit which was organised by my Ministry from 04 to 06 June 2025. The \nrecommendations are presently being translated into an action plan under the ‘Study in \nMauritius’ banner and as an immediate step to develop a roadmap for attracting international \nstudents from key regions.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, a holistic approach is being adopted to promote the Study in \nMauritius and Internationalisation initiatives and these comprise among others – \n• facilitations regarding visa and work permit policies; \n•  simplification of application processes and the introduction of post study work \nvisa framework to retain talents; \n•  language support, cultural adaptation, access to health services, student \norientation and housing standards tailored to international needs, and  \n\n69 \n \n• promoting transnational education through joint-degrees, academic exchanges \nand virtual mobility programmes.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Prayag! \nDr. Prayag: I thank the hon. Minister for such an elaborated reply. Can the hon. \nMinister also inform the House which countries are being targeted by the Study in Mauritius \ncampaign? Thank you. \nDr. Sukon: Initially, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we are targeting countries like \nZimbabwe where we already have a large number of students coming to Mauritius, \nZimbabwe, Botswana in Africa. And in Asia, we are targeting Nepal and Indonesia.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Hon. First Member for Port-Louis North and \nMontagne Longue. \nCRÈVE COEUR – PROPOSED INCINERATOR PROJECT – STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/689",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 689,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/689) Mrs A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the proposed setting \nup of an incinerator at Crève Coeur, he will state where matters stand, giving details thereof \nand indicating the expected start and completion dates thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House about the setting up \nof an incinerator at Crève Coeur, a plot of land measuring 1200 m2 was acquired by the \nDistrict Council of Pamplemousses from Terre-Agri on 29 September 2022 for a token sum \nof Rs1. \nThe proposed project involves the construction of a concrete building to accommodate \nan LPG fire human-incinerator along with a toilet block and other associated amenities. The \ninitial estimated cost of the project is Rs26 million. \nThe District Council of Pamplemousses launched an open national bidding exercise on \n19 February 2025 with a closing date of 03 March 2025. A total of five bids were received \nand opened on 04 March 2025. The evaluation exercise was conducted at the level of the \nCouncil. The lowest evaluated substantially responsive bid was submitted by R1 Enterprises \nLtd for a total amount of Rs26, 97,812.50 inclusive of VAT. As this amount slightly \nexceeded the initial project estimate, an additional sum of Rs97,812.50 was requested from \nmy Ministry. \n\n70 \n \nApproval for the additional funding was granted and formally conveyed on 26 June \n2025. In line with section 40 part (3) of the Public Procurement Act, notification letters were \nissued to both the successful and unsuccessful bidders on 03 July 2025. As no challenge was \nreceived within the prescribed delay period, the contract will be awarded to the lowest \nevaluator responsive bidder by 18 July 2025.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, following the signing of the contract, the contractor will have \n14 days to take possession of the site. Works are expected to begin by the end of August 2025 \nand will be completed within a period of 12 months, that is, by August 2026. \nThank you.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Hon. First Member Piton and Rivière du Rempart. \nSMALL SUGARCANE PLANTERS – LABOUR SHORTAGE – MECHANISED \nSOLUTIONS& FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/690",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 690,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/690) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the small sugarcane planters, he will state the measures being taken to secure – \n (a) adequate labour availability for the cultivation and harvesting of the fields \nthereof; \n (b) availability thereto of mechanized solutions to address labour shortage; \n (c)  improved targeted financial assistance, subsidies or credit schemes to support \nmechanization and improve overall productivity and viability thereof, and \n(d) \nimportation of labour with other ministries.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much hon. Member for putting the question. Mr Deputy \nSpeaker Sir, I will seek your indulgence, but the reply is so long that I might as well circulate \nit.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Circulate it. Thank you. \nDo you have a supplementary? No.  \nHon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière. \n \n \n\n71 \n \nNEW CANCER CENTRE – PET SCAN – ONGOING CANCER TREATMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/691",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 691,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/691) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the New Cancer Centre, he will \nstate – \n(a) \nthe number of patients undergoing treatment thereat, indicating the types of \ncancer being treated, and  \n(b) \nif it is equipped with a fully functional Positron Emission Tomography (PET) \nScan and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the National Cancer Centre, currently manages \napproximately 21,000 active cancer cases. According to the latest National Cancer Registry \nwhich is published annually, a total of 2,841 new cancer cases were diagnosed in Mauritius \nduring the year 2023 comprising 1,205 cases among males and 1,636 cases among females. \nThe primary focus for treatment at the National Cancer Centre includes blood cancers \nand solid tumours or abnormal tissue masses that develop in organs or tissues.  \nThe NCC in Mauritius provides comprehensive treatment for the most common cancer \ndiagnosed in the country. Among males, the Centre treats cancers that are prostate, colorectal \nregions, lungs, stomach, ENT, head and neck.  \nFor females, the NCC offers specialised care for breast, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian \nand cervical cancers, which represent the main cancer type affecting women in Mauritius. A \ntotal of 295 cancer patients have received treatment at the Radiotherapy Department of NCC. \nMajor modalities of treatment include chemotherapy and surgical oncology.  \nI am informed that chemo sessions are predominantly conducted at NCC with 1,200 \nsessions per month and 1,500 chemotherapy sessions delivered monthly across the island in \nall regional hospitals. \nSince Government took office, I took note that all equipment were lying idle. \nConsumables and medicines had expired, and no surgery was being carried out. Over and \nabove the introduction of a second linear accelerator in December 2024, more patients have \nreceived radiotherapy at the centre. A full-fledged surgical Oncology Unit is operational at \nNCC since February of this year whereby 175 cancer patients have undergone surgery with \ntechnical assistance from foreign teams in certain cases. \n\n72 \n \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, the National Cancer Centre has successfully \ncompleted the installation, commissioning and licensing of its state-of-the-art PET CT \nscanner, SPECT-CT scan, Dexa scan and HDR Brachytherapy, marking a significant \nmilestone in the enhancement of hybrid diagnostic imaging in Mauritius.  \nI wish to inform the House that the operational license has already been granted on 07 \nJuly 2025. As at date, 15 PET scan studies have already been carried out on a pilot basis. This \nnumber will increase in the coming weeks so as to allow more patients to benefit from this \nadvanced diagnostic equipment. \nIn addition, my Ministry is having consultation with the Republic of India for acquiring \nthe services of an Oncosurgeon to carry out onco surgeries at the New Cancer Centre on a \nregular basis, thus sustaining the oncosurgery programme. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you.  \nThe hon. Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien! \nCAMP CAROL & KENYA – STATE LAND REGULARISATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/692",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 692,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/692) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the plots of State land at \nCamp Carol and Kenya, he will state the mechanism, if any, put in place for the regularisation \nthereof. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Minister of Housing and Lands, can you please \nfollow? \n(Interruptions)",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: It was an exchange of national importance. Issues were at stake, but we \nmanaged to sort it out. So, thank you very much. \nI am informed that in 1983, Government acquired from Mon Trésor Mon Désert, now \nOmnicane, at the nominal price of Rs10 a plot of land of an extent of 11 acres (65 perches) at \nCamp Carol, commonly referred to as Kenya, located near Le Bouchon, in view of \nregularising the situation of the families who have been occupying these plots of lands since \nthe aftermath of cyclone Carol.  \n\n73 \n \nIn 1985, part of the site was parcelled out whereby some 75 residential leases were \ngranted. Subsequently, some 60 pre-July 2015 squatters, over the remaining part of the State \nland, were each granted a lease for residential purpose. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that following subdivision of some of the plots \nof land, there are at present a total of 149 plots at Camp Carol as follows – \n• 145 residential plots; \n• One plot on which stands a village hall; \n• One plot occupied by the Arya Samaj; \n• One plot leased to forces vives of Camp Carol, and  \n• One vacant plot. \nMy Ministry, in accordance with the provisions of Section 5(5) of the State Lands Act, \nalso proceeded with the sale of State land to the families holding a building site lease for \nresidential purposes. I am informed that 72 notarial deeds witnessing the sale of the land have \nalready been registered. 37 cases are currently being processed, and 34 cases will be \nprocessed once pending issues relating to expiry of leases, dispute among heirs, and site \noccupation are resolved. \nThe remaining two cases pertain to suspected squatting that have not yet been \nregularised as further investigation is required. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien! \nPLACE D’ARMES-NORTH EXIT – ROAD DIVERSION REVERSAL",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/693",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 693,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/693) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the current diversion \nof the exit road from Place d’Armes to the North through the Royal Street or SSR Street, he \nwill state if consideration will be given for the reverting of same through the motorway, back \nto how it was prior to the construction of the Metro Line.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that in 2015, the Road \nDevelopment Authority (RDA) commissioned a traffic study with a view to reviewing traffic \nscheme in Port Louis so as to alleviate the current severe traffic condition along the \nmotorway.  \nIt was observed that one of the main bottlenecks was at the Place d’Armes intersection \nwhich serves as the amin entry and exit point for both Northbound and Southbound traffic. \n\n74 \n \nFurther to the recommendation of the study, the Decaen Flyover Project was \nimplemented in 2018 which connects Motorway M1 to A1 Road in front of Line Barracks to \nprovide for a second entry point to the city centre for traffic coming from the South.  \nVarious traffic schemes have been implemented by the RDA as an integral part of the \nDecaen Flyover to alleviate traffic congestion as follows – \n1) \nReconfiguration of the junction at Place d’Armes by eliminating the right \nturning movement to the North. This movement towards the North via M2 was \nprohibited to ensure a better traffic fluidity for the main stream traffic along the \nmotorway for the Northbound and Southbound traffic; \n2) \nFollowing the aforementioned traffic restraint, traffic are now using alternative \nroutes to exit the city centre to proceed towards the North via M2 as follows – \n(i) \nLeft turning exit at Place d’Armes on Motorway M1. The U-turn at \nCaudan roundabout to the North (turning to the left roundabout then \ngoing to the North). \n(ii) \nRoyal Street-Nicolay Road-Military Road (the connection) to \neventually join Motorway M2 through new Quay D interchange. \n(iii) \nBrown Sequard Street via Orlean Street and Deschartres Street via \nCaudan roundabout and slip lane towards Motorway M2; \n(iv) \nBrown Sequard Street-Orlean Street-d’Entrecasteaux Street - A1 Road-\nColonel Sandapa Street-Caudan Roundabout and then the slip lane \ntowards Motorway M2. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, prior to the implementation of the Decaen Project and the \nextension of the metro line to the Place d’Armes Metro station, there were five lanes in the \nNorthbound direction with three through-lanes towards the North and two right turning lanes \ntowards the city centre. There were two lanes in the Southbound direction. With this \nconsideration, the capacity of the motorway at this particularly junction was adequate to cater \nfor high traffic volume during peak hours for both through and turning movements. \nCurrently, there are only two through-lanes for movement towards the North and only \none right turning lane towards the city centre, while the lane configuration towards the South \nhas remained unchanged. This is because of the Metro Express Project. It has consumed \nspace on the motorway. This has decreased, therefore, the capacity for moving traffic from \nfive lanes to three lanes along the Northbound carriageway.  \n\n75 \n \nWith this reduction in lane configuration from five lanes to three lanes, there has been a \nconsiderable decrease in the overall junction capacity, for both through and right turning \nmovements. \nFrom a traffic management point of view, the new road configuration has reduced \ncapacity and restoring the right turning movement towards the North will critically impact \nupon the performance of Place d’Armes junction, resulting in longer traffic queues and \nconsiderable traffic delays for traffic along M1 and M2. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, therefore, from the foregoing, reverting to the old \nconfiguration is now not feasible. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nFREE TRANSPORT SCHEME – BUS OPERATORS PAYMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/694",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 694,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/694) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the free transport allocation paid to bus \noperators in respect of students and beneficiaries of the Basic Retirement Pension, he will \nstate – \n(a) \nthe quantum thereof paid to bus companies and private bus owners in Financial \nYear 2024-2025, and \n(b) \nif consideration will be given for a review of the formula for the payment \nthereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, \nI am tabling the requested information which was obtained from the National Land Transport \nAuthority (NLTA). \nAs regards part (b), I am informed that the regulator has already started working on the \nproposals to review the existing methodology used for the calculation and payment of the \nFree Travel Subsidy. I am made to understand that the current formula, which dates back to \nthe introduction of the Free Travel Scheme in 2005, is primarily based on fixed amounts for \ndifferent routes and the estimated fleet utilisation for each operator.  \n \n \n \n\n76 \n \nAs such, payments to the bus operators are made as follows – \nBus Company \nEstimated Rate of Utilisation \nNTC \n78% \nUBS \n77% \nTBS \n88% \nRHT \n77% \nMBT \n90% \nIndividual Bus Operators including Rodrigues \n90% \n \nThe monthly free travel compensation per bus for Individual Bus Operators for the \ndifferent routes including Rodrigues, range from Rs35,750 to Rs71,500 monthly. \nHowever, with the forthcoming implementation of the Fleet Management System \n(FMS) which will enable real-time monitoring of bus operations including number of trips \nperformed and distance travelled, the NLTA will be able to effect the payment of the free \ntravel compensation more rationally, fairly and judiciously since such payments would be on \na trip basis.  \nAs such, Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Fleet Management System will undoubtedly allow \nfor subsidy calculation based on the actual number of trips completed, thereby ensuring \ngreater accountability, transparency, and alignment with level service delivery and therefore, \nbetter value to money to taxpayers. \nThus, the revised payment formula along with the support of the FSM will soon put a \nfull stop to the current state of chaotic affairs – it is quite chaotic, hon. Members will know – \nwhich has perpetuated and worsened over the last decade. Here, I would like to emphasise on \nstatistics which showcase that – \n(i) \nthere has been an increase of 51% in our vehicular fleet since 2015 to date with \nvehicles which registered at the NLTA – it was 486,000 plus, now it is 736,000 \nplus. Therefore, one would expect more people to use vehicles than buses. So, \ntherefore, nothing has been done during the past 10 years and I am questioning \nthat now; \n(ii) \nthe number of buses licensed with Road Service Licences has decreased by over \n100 buses in the last 10 years, and \n(iii) \nthe metro express has been introduced since 2020 and it commutes some 40,000 \npassengers per day. So, one will expect less people travelling by the bus. \n\n77 \n \nDespite the aforementioned figures, the payment mechanism and quantum for free \ntravel compensation have remained almost unchanged and I condemn this irresponsible \ndisbursement of funds over the last 10 years. \n This is why Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I maintained that the Fleet Management System \nwill be a “Gamechanger”. A sum of Rs70 million, for the first time ever has been catered for \nthis current budget exercise. The Consultant has finalised the document and same expected to \nbe launched soon. \nFurthermore, a consultation exercise has been fixed for Thursday 24 July 2025 wherein \nall concerned stakeholders including bus operators mostly will be briefed on the Fleet \nManagement System, the forthcoming Bus Services Bill as well as an introduction on the \nCashless Ticketing System which is also in the list of projects in the pipeline for my Ministry. \nThe above will undeniably bring a paradigm shift in the quest for the modernisation of \nthe land transport, as provided for in the Government Programme 2025-2029. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member! \nMr Quirin : Merci, M. le président. Par rapport à la décision du gouvernement de \nrepousser la pension de vieillesse à 65 ans, l’honorable ministre peut-il nous dire comment il \ncompte s’y prendre en ce qui concerne les personnes du troisième âge, justement, qui \nvoyagent gratuitement par autobus, il y aura-t-il des changements à ce niveau ? \nMr Osman Mahomed: In so far as this is concerned, I think there is no need for \nconcern on this. There is no change. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Montagne Blanche and GRSE! \n \nBUS ROUTES 16, 80, 113 & 113A – TRANSPORT SERVICES – REMEDIAL \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/695",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 695,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/695) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member Montagne Blanche & GRSE) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to bus routes 16, 80, 113 and 113a, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information as \nto the remedial measures undertaken to ensure regular and reliable public transport services, \nespecially in the morning regarding the students.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the National Land \nTransport Authority (NLTA)… \nThe Deputy Speaker: If your answer is long, you can circulate it. It looks very long. \nMr Osman Mahomed: It is quite long. Can I read the essential parts then?  \n\n78 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: No, you can circulate it. My friend will…  \nMr Osman Mahomed: Okay, thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you have supplementary questions? \nThe hon. Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka! \n \nSUPPLY TEACHERS – WORK CONTRACTS – ENHANCING CAREER \nPROGRESSION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/696",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 696,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/696) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the current \npractice of enlistment of supply teachers in Mauritius, he will state if an assessment of the \nadverse impacts thereof on employee retention and motivation, in view of the precarity \nthereof, has been carried out and, if so, indicate – \n(a) \nthe outcome thereof, and \n(b) \nif consideration will be given for the replacement thereof with a practice \nconsisting of secured work contracts for enhanced career progression of the \nteachers and quality-driven long-term teaching for the students.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me at the outset convey my gratitude to \nall supply teachers who have helped my Ministry to palliate the shortages of academic staffs \nand ensure that classes are not let unattended and students are not penalised. \nIn fact, it has been the practice for my Ministry to have recourse under delegated power \nto enlist the services of supply teachers in primary and secondary schools as a contingency \nmeasure to cater for the shortage of educators who have proceeded on maternity leave, long \nvacation leave, leave without pay and study leave. The availability of the pool of supply \nteachers is also crucial where the gaps occur in the recruitment exercise of permanent \neducators, for instance, with the introduction of new subjects arising due to curriculum \nreforms. \nIt is also known that supply teachers do not benefit from the same compensation or \nother privileges as compared to holders of permanent post as educators, thus, impacting on \ntheir motivation and resulting in low retention capacity. To this effect, consultations have \nbeen held between my Ministry and the Ministry of Public Service on the modalities towards \ndevising a more attractive scheme of service for supply teachers of primary and secondary \nschools with a view to improving their working conditions. \n\n79 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, these consultations have \nresulted in the identification by my Ministry of a number of additional benefits that may be \ngranted to supply teachers and these have been transmitted to the Ministry of Public Service. \nMy Ministry has been informed by the Ministry of Public Service that the recommendations \nhave already been made on the basis of our consultations to the Pay Research Bureau for \nconsideration in the next report. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, a view of the fact that \nrecommendations have already been made to the PRB, it is advisable at this stage that we \nawait the outcome thereof, and hope for an enhanced career progression of teachers and \nquality driven long-term teaching for the students. \nMoreover, after, les Assises de l'Éducation held in April this year, we are going to hold \nthe validation workshops prior to finalising the blueprint for the education sector. I will \npersonally ensure that the issue related to supply teachers is given due consideration. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Savanne and Black River! \n \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 14 – PET CREMATION/BURIAL – ALLOCATION OF \nSTATE LAND",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/697",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 697,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/697) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the disposal of pet carcasses, he will \nstate if consideration will be given either for the allocation of a plot of State land for burial \nthereof or for the identification of a designated site for pet cremation with the collaboration of \nthe local authority in Constituency No. 14, Savanne and Black River.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in accordance with section 50 of the Local \nGovernment Act 2011 as subsequently amended, the responsibility of the removal and safe \ndisposal of dead animals from public roads and other locations rest with local authorities. \nThe burial of animal carcasses is regulated under the Animal Disease Act of 1925. At \npresent, I am informed that there is no officially designated burial ground for dead animals \nunder the purview of local authorities. In practice, scavenging teams collect animal carcasses \nfrom roadsides or other locations either upon complaints or during routine inspection. These \ncarcasses are treated with lime, seal in plastic bags and transported to transfer stations for \nappropriate disposals. \nI am further informed that in 2022, a motion was made by the hon. Member who was \nthen serving as District Councillor, to identify a burial site for diseased animal within the \n\n80 \n \nSurinam Cemetery or of the suitable location in the Savanne region. This proposal is still \nunder consideration. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard the Ministry of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue \nEconomy and Fisheries, I am advised that no State land has yet been specifically allocated for \nthe burial of pets. \nNonetheless, a formal request for this purpose was submitted by the Ministry of Agro-\nIndustry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries to the Ministry of Housing and Lands \nduring the first week of July.  \nFurthermore, the Mauritius Society for Animal Welfare (MSAW) operating under the \naegis of Ministry of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries provide \ndisposal services for the carcasses of dogs, cats and other small animals. These services are \nprovided upon payment typically ranging from Rs1500 to Rs3000 and include both the \ncollection and cremation of carcasses at the incinerator located at Bassin Requin, Belle Mare. \nThis facility operates under the Division of Veterinary Services of the Ministry of Agro-\nIndustry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries and is open from Monday to Saturday. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Ministry of Health and Wellness plays an important role in \nensuring that any animal burial site complies with public health standards. I am informed that \nshould there be any disposal or need to bury pets in existing cemeteries where land is \navailable, prior approval from the Ministry of Health and Wellness is mandatory to ensure \nthat all sanitary and public health requirements are strictly observed. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, environmental considerations also play an important role. The \nMinistry of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change, through its Solid \nWaste Management Division, is tasked with ensuring that burial sites do not pose any risk of \nenvironmental contamination. In particular, any proposed pet cemetery must be located at \nleast 30 metres away from the water resources, drains or similar features to prevent \ncontamination and to address potential impacts related to climate change. The proposal to \nconstruct a new incinerator for dead animals at Saint Martin has been proposed in 2025-2026 \nbudgetary framework. However, the establishment of such a facility or pet burial site would \nnecessitate a comprehensive feasibility study and significant public investment. In addition to \ninitial capital expenditure, ongoing costs such as staffing, equipment maintenance and \nutilities must also be considered. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, given the complexity of this issue, including consideration of \npublic health environment protection, land use and financial implication, I am proposing the \n\n81 \n \nestablishment of a technical committee and this committee will comprise relatively of the \nMinistry of Agro-Industry, MSAW, Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Health and \nWellness and my Ministry. Its mandate will be to develop a comprehensive project proposal \naddressing the burial and disposal of deceased animals. I am personally liaising with the hon. \nMinister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries to advance in this \ninitiative.  \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle! \nTERRE ROUGE/VERDUN LINK ROAD – COST & DURATION – \nREPAIRS/REHABILITATION WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/698",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 698,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/698) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the Terre Rouge/Verdun \nLink Road, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Road Development \nAuthority, information as to the – \n(a) \ntotal construction – \n(i) \ncost, and  \n(ii) \nduration of the initial project, and  \n(b) \nmajor repairs/rehabilitation works carried out over the past ten years, indicating \nthe outstanding works, if any, further indicating the – \n(i) \nexpected completion, complete rehabilitation and coming into operation \ndates thereof and  \n(ii) \ntotal variation costs incurred, if any.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Road Development \nAuthority that the Terre Rouge/Verdun Link Road, now known as the Motorway M3 Road \nwas initiated by the RDA on 18 February 2010 and the project was completed on 30 \nNovember 2013. The cost of the initial project, comprising a total of 15.7 kilometres of dual \ncarriageway was Rs2.162 billion inclusive of VAT. The final price was Rs2.896 billion \ninclusive of VAT, taking into consideration additional works, dispute settlement costs, \nremedial works, prolongation costs and price adjustments. The contractor on the project was \nColas (Maurice), Colas (Madagascar) Terre Rouge/Verdun/Trianon Link Road Joint-Venture. \nConsultancy fees paid to the consultant Egis BCEOM International stands at Rs121 million \ninclusive of VAT. \n\n82 \n \nI am informed that during the implementation of the project, several landslides occurred \nduring the period 2010 to 2013 in four specific zones of cuts which prevented the completion \nof the project over a length of about 2.7 kilometres along the southbound carriageway \ntowards Ripailles. I am informed that several attempts were made to reprofile the slopes at \nthat time but given the complexity of the terrain, unusual geotechnical conditions and the \nhigh-water table, the works in whole could not be completed successfully. Hence, the \ndecision of the RDA to allocate a separate contract for the treatment of the landslides in the \nbest interest of the works. The contract was accordingly awarded to Sinohydro Corporation \nLimited for an initial amount of Rs762 million, inclusive of VAT. The commencement date \nwas 3 October 2014 and the contract period was 457 calendar days, that is, up to 2 January \n2016. Additional works were carried out for an increase in the scope of works due to redesign \nof slopes, installation of rock nets, extension of time with cost and repair of landslide, \nbringing the contract amount to Rs924 million, inclusive of VAT. Consultancy fees paid to the \nconsultant GET2 on the project stands at Rs9.8 million, inclusive of VAT. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed that after the expiry of the defects \nliability period, on 19 January 2015, cracks reappeared on the finished road level of the Terre \nRouge/Verdun Link Road near Valton roundabout. The transverse cracks propagated very \nswiftly and the road eventually subsided due to a failure of the embankment. Several \nconsultants were appointed by the RDA to determine the cause of the failure and to propose \nadequate solutions and provide assistance during supervision of the works, namely – \n(i) \nARQ Consulting Engineers South Africa for an amount of Rs4.1 million inclusive \nof VAT; \n(ii) \nKorea Expressway Corporation for an amount of Rs2.7 million inclusive of VAT, \nand \n(iii) Water Research Contractor for the boreholes drilling for an amount of Rs4.3 \nmillion inclusive of VAT. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have been made aware that at that specific time, the \nprofessional indemnity insurance of the consultant Egis BCEOM International was still valid \ntill December 2015. Despite that, for some obscure reasons, at that material time, the then \nGovernment did not explore any avenue legal or otherwise to recoup the cost of repairs from \nthe consultant or the contractor. It should be highlighted that with a view to maintaining \ntraffic on the Terre Rouge/Verdun Link Road at that point in time, a bypass road of 485 \nmetres had to be constructed to avoid the damaged section. The works were allocated to \n\n83 \n \nGamma Construction Limited on 02 March 2015 for an amount of Rs18.3 million inclusive \nof VAT. The works started on 03 March 2015 and were completed on 06 April 2015. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, based on the solution proposed by KEC, namely a horizontal \nreplacement method, the RDA awarded a contract for repair to embankment on Motorway \nM3 at Ripailles project through Transinvest Construction, previously known as Colas, one of \nthe party to whom the initial contract was awarded as a joint-venture for Rs326.1 million \ninclusive of VAT. However, during the period mid-December 2017 to mid-January 2018, after \nfrequent rainfall events, there were major cracks and slope movements, landslides on the \nmountain side, which affected the ongoing works. Subsequently, the contractor based on the \nadvice of a leading expert in geotechnical engineering, proposed to undertake piles \nstabilisation to prevent the sliding as an additional measure. \n A consultancy contract was then awarded to CEREMA from France for an amount of \nRs3.2 million inclusive of VAT which is specialised in such type of works, to undertake the \nreinforcement designs and provide assistance during supervision of the works. The piling \nworks were awarded in September 2018 to Sinohydro Corporation (Mauritius) Limited for \nthe sum of Rs142.4 million inclusive of VAT plus a provisional sum of Rs11.5 million, \ninclusive of VAT for unforeseen condition. The order to commence was issued on 22 October \n2018 and all piling works were completed on 18 February 2019. The whole repair works \nwere substantially completed on 19 July 2019. It is also worth to note that in January 2018, \nthere was a collapse on the left-hand side northbound, approximately 475 metres from the \nRipailles roundabout opposite one of the previously affected sections. In order to stabilise this \nsection, a contract for the design and build turnkey was awarded to Sinohydro Corporation \nfor the sum of Rs133.4 million, inclusive of VAT. The works started on 18 February 2019 and \nwere completed on 16 September 2019. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, a project which initially started on 18 February 2010, to be \ncompleted on 30 November 2013 for a sum of Rs2.283 billion has ended up to be completed \nin September 2019, for a total sum of Rs5.238 billion, more than twice its projected initial \ncost, depicting the vulnerable condition arising out of climatic change, but at the same time, \nhighlighting the weaknesses of non-timely actions which could have been taken in 2015. \nAs regards part (b)(i) and (ii), the question does not arise. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay. Time is over!  \n\n84 \n \nThe Table has been advised that the following PQs have been withdrawn – B/700, \nB/702, B/703, B/704, B/706, B/707, B/708. \nMotion! \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I beg to move that all the \nbusiness on today’s Order Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of \nStanding Order 10. \nDr. Boolell rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nThe Deputy Speaker: I suspend the Sitting for half an hour. \nAt 4.03 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 4.32 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Please be seated! \nHon. Prime Minister! \nPUBLIC BILL \nFirst reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Financial Crimes Commission (Amendment) Bill \n(No. XVI of 2025) was read a first time. \nSecond Reading \nTHE FINANCIAL CRIMES COMMISSION (AMENDMENT) BILL  \n(NO. XVI OF 2025) \nOrder for Second Reading read. \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I move that the Financial Crimes \nCommission (Amendment) Bill (No. XVI of 2025) be read a second time. \n\n85 \n \nLet me start, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, by reminding the House that, as stated in the \nGovernment Programme of 2025-2029, because of the serious challenges to rule of law and \nthe role of the enforcement agencies, Government said that we will take measures to deal \nmore effectively with crimes generally, but also including financial crimes.  \nThis Government has repeatedly pledged that we shall leave no stone unturned in our \ncommitment to strengthening the Mauritius investigating capabilities, particularly against \nfinancial crimes. \nBefore I come to the provisions of the Bill, I want to say a few words by way of \nintroduction. After ten years of connivance by the previous government, when the scourge of \ndrug trafficking was allowed to seep deep into the fabric of our society, the need for our law \nenforcement agencies to work more effectively together has never been greater.  \nYet, the whole nation knows why was the Financial Crimes Commission Act passed. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it was not passed to intensify the combat against the money \nlaunderers, the fraudsters, the corrupt or the gangsters who have infected public life in our \ncountry. It was passed to protect or pursue those whom the last government ordained. Some \npeople were completely protected; some people were harassed. That is why this Financial \nCrimes Commission Act was passed.  \nA good example is why else would they exclude the vital role of the constitutionally \nindependent Director of Public Prosecutions, an offence against which the last government \nshamefully mounted, attack after attack after attack! \nThe Financial Crimes Commission was not created to work hand in hand with the other \nagencies, but to be controlled by one political party in its own interest. That is why it was \npassed. \nContrary to them, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we, in this Government, are introducing \nnew legislation to rebuild the capacity of our law enforcement agencies to act effectively, \nindependently and objectively. As the President’s Speech has already foreshadowed, we \nintend to establish a new Mauritius National Crime Agency.  \nAs we embark upon this essential amendment today, it is critical to remember its \noverarching aim, which is empowering our legislative authorities and eventually transitioning \n\n86 \n \ntowards establishing a comprehensive national crime agency, which would be modelled on \nthe international best practices, notably in the United Kingdom. \nIn this regard, Mauritius has already started to work closely with the British authorities. \nThis is provided in our strategic partnership framework established earlier this year in the \ncontext of the Chagos Treaty. This is already there. The United Kingdom has indicated its \nwillingness to provide substantial support for the establishment of our National Crime \nAgency, including providing expert, technical and strategic advice, legislative guidance and \norganisational expertise. This collaboration will significantly enhance our capabilities to \neffectively tackle financial crimes and also other civil crimes. \nThe possibility of joint investigations, as outlined in the newly introduced Section 58A \nof the Financial Crimes Commission Act, marks a significant step towards this vision. This \njoint endeavour is being advised by a team of international expert investigators, embedded \nwith the Police, who are helping to bring new techniques and approaches and sharper focus, \nurgency and coherence to important investigations. \nExperience has shown, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that it is not always desirable or \nefficient to separate responsibility for the investigation of offences artificially. It is often the \ncase that offences for investigation, of which the Police are responsible, are also closely \nconnected to financial crimes, which at the moment, fall under the responsibility of the \nFinancial Crimes Commission. So, these offences are being investigated separately; the FCC \non one side and the Police on the other. \nIn such cases, it is obviously desirable and common sense that the two agencies, the \nMauritius Police Force and the Financial Crimes Commission, should work closely together, \nand in certain circumstances, should have the capability of mounting a joint investigation into \nparticular suspects or criminal groups.  \nThese criminals, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, do not look at the statute. They do not see \nwhich compartments are going to affect them. The fragmented approach between the \nFinancial Crimes Commission and the Police has often resulted in unnecessary duplication. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, when there are duplications, you will find that there are leakages as \nwell. Somebody has spoken to somebody else. Unnecessary duplication, but more \nimportantly, delays in investigations and ultimately prosecutions.  \n\n87 \n \nAt this stage, we urgently need to reinforce the capabilities of the Police and the FCC to \nprovide a workable framework in order not to jeopardise enquiries which are ongoing or \nbecome necessary.  \nCriminal networks exploit these procedural gaps and this leads to the undermining of \npublic trust and confidence in our system.  \nWith the proposed amendments, we will ensure clearer, structured cooperation in three \ndistinct and practical scenarios – \n(i) \nIn the course of an ongoing police investigation, should evidence arise indicating \nfinancial crimes, which often does, that normally would fall within the remits of \nthe Financial Crimes Commission.  \nSo, you can see, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, two separate investigations are started. \nThe Police now has a clear mandate not only to inform the Commission but also \nto directly collaborate with them. This will ensure a swift and coordinated \nresponse from the very beginning, maximising the potential for successful \nprosecutions. \n(ii) \nIn the instances where the Financial Crimes Commission is already investigating \nan offense and the Police, in the meantime, uncover related criminal activities, \njoint operations can now be promptly initiated upon request. \nThis coordinated approach ensures a comprehensive, consistent, and unified \ninvestigative efforts across the different law enforcement bodies. \n(iii) The third scenario provides, what we can call, flexibility. Should both the Police \nand the Financial Crimes Commission agree that a joint investigation would be \nbeneficial, they will be empowered to initiate a coordinated effort, pooling \nresources, pooling intelligence and special skills.  \n \nSuch fluid cooperation will greatly enhance the effectiveness, speed and depth of \ninvestigative processes, leaving no space for the criminals to evade justice.  \nThese interim measures, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, pending the fully-fledged NCA Bill \ndo not in any way impede the work of the FCC or the work of the Police. They create a \npossible collaboration to ensure a more efficient process, given the ramification that can exist \nin large scale enquiries. Not only has the Commissioner of Police the obligation to inform the \nCommission but then the onus is squarely on the two investigative agencies to work together.  \n\n88 \n \nThis amendment is intended to do just that. It is carefully designed to promote \ncooperation and where necessary joint investigations between the Police and the Financial \nCrimes Commission while respecting the current statutory independence of each agency.  \nAnd, I must explain some of the technical details of the Bill, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, \nfor example, clause 4 introduces a new section 58A (1) – I will move for an amendment later \non – into the Financial Crimes Commission Act.  \nClause 2 makes section 56 of the Act which gives exclusive power to the Financial \nCrimes Commission to investigate all money laundering, fraud and corruption be subject to \nthe new section 58A, in other words, for the collaboration between the two. It envisages three \npossible separate situations – \n(i) \nClause 58A (1) deals with the situation in which the Police are investigating or \nthey intend to investigate an offense under the general Criminal Code or the Penal \nProvisions. While they are doing this, they may become aware that the offense \nthey are investigating or intend to investigate, is connected to an offense of fraud \nor corruption under the Financial Crimes Commission which is not already under \ninvestigation by the FCC.  \n \n(ii) \nThe new section 58A (2) requires the Police to keep the FCC fully informed of \nthe progress of the investigation and provides that the FCC may require the Police \nto investigate the fraud and corruption offense jointly. However, clause 58A also \nprovides that the Police must serve notice – he cannot just do so – on the FCC \nthat they are doing this.  \nThe new section 58A (2) requires the Police to keep the FCC fully informed of \nthe progress of the investigation and provides that the FCC may require the Police \nto investigate jointly with them the offense of fraud or corruption.  \nNothing, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in section 58A (2) prevents the FCC from \ndoing so at any time during the Police investigation. That is deliberate because \nthere may well be cases in which the FCC only becomes aware at some later \nstage that circumstances are there that make it desirable that it should also be \ninvolved because they are cases of financial crimes. \n(iii) Section 58A (3) provides for the second situation, that is, the Police are \ninvestigating or intend to investigate an offence which appears to them to be \n\n89 \n \nrelated to an offence of fraud or corruption under the FCC Act which is already \nunder investigation by the FCC. In those circumstances, the Commissioner of \nPolice may require the FCC to investigate the fraud or corruption offence jointly \nwith the Police. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in each of these two cases, the amendment gives both the \nPolice and the FCC the right to opt for a joint investigation without the need for actual \nconsent. They can do so if they feel there is a need for it. This reflects the fact that in each of \nthese two cases, both law enforcement agencies will have a direct and substantial interest in \nthe investigation. It might justifiably be that they will be impeded in their statutory functions, \nobviously, if related enquiries were to be pursued separately. \nHowever, as I said earlier, they are not obliged to require such a joint investigation. The \nproposed amendments will open the possibility that they may choose to ensure appropriate \ncoordination between the enquiries by informal consultation and cooperation under the new \nsection 58 (5) and they agree for a joint investigation.  \nAs I say, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is only if either agency believes that from its \nperspective a joint investigation will be necessary and advantageous, and if the other \ndisagree, that it would be necessary to exercise the statutory options the new section 58A (1) \nand (4) create. Whether or not the Police or the FCC reach that conclusion will depend, \nobviously, on the circumstances and individual facts of the relevant enquiries.  \nHowever, if one or the other agencies believes strongly that only closed and detailed \njoint planning and decision-making implied by a joint investigation will successfully lead to a \nresolution of the enquiry, it could then insist, only then, that a joint investigation be \nundertaken. \nIn those circumstances, clause 58A (4) requires each to put in place suitable \narrangements for the efficient joint conduct on the investigation. This reflects the fact that in \neach of those cases, both law enforcement agencies will have a direct and substantial interest \nin the investigation which are very often, not only serious but very complex enquiries. \nHowever, they are not obliged, as I said earlier, for a joint investigation. The proposed \namendments leave open that possibility, as I explained. \n\n90 \n \nFinally, as I already intimated, clause 58A (5) provides for the first situation. It gives to \nthe Commissioner of Police and the Financial Crimes Commission the legal basis to agree for \njoint investigations when it is plainly of mutual benefit and for the public interest. \nAt present, there is no expressed legal basis for formal joint investigation between the \nPolice and the FCC. The Government believes it is desirable that the law in such important \nmatter should be expressed and unambiguous. Indeed, it is reasonably to be expected and \nvery much to be hoped that the new section 58A (5) will be the normal route to which joint \ninvestigations are established. \nThis Bill, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, is intended to promote greater and more efficient \ncollaboration and ensure the close and cooperative functioning of the two most important law \nenforcement and investigative agencies in Mauritius. This will be an important preparatory \nstep for the formation of the Mauritius National Crime Agency and I cannot emphasise the \nseminal importance for Mauritius of making a success for that new institution. \nIn conclusion, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, these amendments are fundamental to our \nunwavering commitment to transparent government, efficient administration of justice and \nsecuring a safe and prosperous future for Mauritius. They formed, in fact, the very bed rock \nupon which we will build our future National Crime Agency, ensuring Mauritius remains \nvigilant and resilient against financial and organised crime. \nFor the time being, it enhances cooperation between the two investigative agencies \nwhich will eventually report to the Director of Public Prosecutions, without in any way \nhindering or sidelining one or the other agency. It is, in fact, the DPP who will decide \nwhether to prosecute or not to prosecute.  \nFor these reasons, I strongly commend the Bill to the House.  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Leader of the Opposition! \n(4.52 p.m.)  \nThe Leader of the Opposition (Mr G. Lesjongard): Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, \nSir. \n\n91 \n \nM. le président, j’ai entre mes mains la liste des orateurs et l’ordre des intervenants \npour le FCC Bill. Je constate, malheureusement, qu’on déroge d’une des traditions établies \npour les débats dans cette Chambre.   \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Leader of the Opposition… \nMr Lesjongard: C’est-à-dire, … \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Leader of the Opposition, please, let me.  \nYour name is on the list to address the Bill before the House. I have before me the list \nof those who are going to intervene. And we are going to go according to that list. It has \nalways been the tradition of this House for the Chair to go according to the list which is \nsubmitted to him/her. The Chair does not go behind the scene to see how this list is prepared \nor how we have come to that list. We will go according to that list. I will not allow any \nintervention or any remark made to that list. If you have any queries, you know, you are a \nseasoned politician, you have been Deputy Speaker, your colleague has been Speaker and \nyou know what to do. \nSo, we will proceed with the list.  \nMr A. Duval: May I please, raise to the attention of the Chair, on a point of order … \nThe Deputy Speaker: Which order, which point of order? \nMr A. Duval: Yes, the point of order concerns the rules of debate, Mr Deputy Speaker, \nSir, with regard to …  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Which point of order? \nMr A. Duval: On the rules of debate. Look at … \nThe Deputy Speaker: Which point of order? \nMr A. Duval: You have to check the rules of debate. \nThe Deputy Speaker: No! No! \nMr A. Duval:  The point of order is as follows, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, … \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: No! No! \n\n92 \n \nHon. A. Duval, please! I have already said…  \nMr A. Duval: May I please raise the attention …  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, the rules of debates, I have to catch the eye. I know the \nrules of debate.  \nMr A. Duval: I am glad you know it! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Sit down, please! \nMr A. Duval: May I raise… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Can I… \nI am on my feet now! \n(Interruptions) \nPlease sit down! \nHon. Members: Sit down! \nAn hon. Member: Asize do. Malelve! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Malelve! \nThe Deputy Speaker: The rules of debate is about catching the eyes of an intervener \n… \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: Ey ale do ta! Kisenla to pe fer per isi twa? \nThe Deputy Speaker: The rules of debate is about catching the eyes of an intervener. \nMr A. Duval: Apart to lavwa narien pa marser ar twa! \nThe Deputy Speaker: You have been here; I have been here for more than 20 years \nnow. It has always been the tradition that a list is submitted to the Chair and we go according \nto the list. We have a Chief Whip from the Government and we have a Whip for the \nOpposition. It is for you to take your responsibility. The list is before me and we are going to \ngo according to that list. Thank you.  \nHon. Leader of the Opposition, you have … \n\n93 \n \nMr A. Duval: May I raise a Point of Order, please? \nThe Deputy Speaker: No! I am not going … \nMr A. Duval: Can I, please…  \n(Interruptions) \nMay I …  \nThe Deputy Speaker: I am on my feet. \n(Interruptions) \nI am on my feet.  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Malelve! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Please! \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Met li dehor! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: I wish to …  \nThe Deputy Speaker: I am on my feet! Let me say…  \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members: Sit down! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Sit down! \nMr A. Duval: Eta ale do ta! \nThe Deputy Speaker: I am on my feet.  \n(Interruptions) \nOrder! Order! \nWe are … \nMr A. Duval:  Al to lakaz do ta! To vinn isi pou fou dezord ! Sa mem to travay! \n(Interruption) \nThe Deputy Speaker: No, cross talking, please. I am on my feet!  \n\n94 \n \nWe are going to address the Bill before the House as per the list submitted to me. I am \nnot going to entertain any Standing Order or any remarks … \nMr A. Duval: But you are being arbitrary! \nThe Deputy Speaker: … or any remarks made on the list. \nIf you feel I am arbitrary, you know what to do. You have been a Speaker, if you want \nto challenge my ruling, you know what to do. Okay? \n(Interruptions) \nNow, let’s go back to the Bill.  Hon. Leader of the Opposition, you have the floor! \nMr A. Duval: I will raise it when I will speak. \nMr Lesjongard: M. le président, je voulais faire le point, parce que dois-je comprendre \nque c’est mon collègue…  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Leader of the Opposition… \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard: Laissez-moi terminer. Dois-je comprendre que c’est mon collègue, \nl’honorable Adrien Duval, qui aura à réfuter les arguments du leader de l’opposition… \nThe Deputy Speaker: I don’t know what he is going to … \nMr Lesjongard: … à l’intérieur de cette Chambre ? \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: He does not have to refute; he has to address on the Bill.  \n(Interruptions) \nIf he wants to address on the Bill, he addresses on the Bill, and you are being invited now, \nhon. Leader of the Opposition… \nMr Lesjongard: C’est pourquoi, je dis qu’on déroge d’une des traditions les plus \nimportantes lors des débats à l’intérieur de cette Chambre, M. le président.    \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, let’s come to the Bill.  \n(Interruptions) \n\n95 \n \nOrder! Order! Let’s listen to the Bill.  \nMr Mohamed:  Tras traser Joe! Tras traser!  \nMr A. Duval : Wai ! Mari approfondissement demokrasi! \n(Interruptions) \nMo pou al explike la! \nMr Lesjongard: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, first of all, allow me to begin my \nintervention by referring and the hon. Prime Minister made reference to paragraph 10 of the \nGovernment Programme 2025-2029 and I quote – \n“In view of the recent serious challenges to the rule of law and the role of enforcement \nagencies, Government will take immediate measures to ensure that they operate in a \ntotally independent and transparent manner.” \nIt goes on – \n“Government will repeal the Financial Crimes Commission (FCC) Act and will set up a \nnational crime agency which will be better equipped to deal more effectively with \nfinancial and other serious crimes. The agency will not impinge on the prosecutorial \npowers of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) but will ensure that an \ninvestigation is carried out independently, objectively and effectively.” \nM. le président, sept mois après, le Financial Crimes Commission Act, est toujours \nvivant et rien à l’horizon concernant cette nouvelle agence, c’est-à-dire, le National Crime \nAgency, alors que dans le discours programme, le gouvernement parlait des immediate \nmeasures, mais non-seulement des immediate measures mais aussi that investigations are \ncarried out independently and objectively.  \nM. le président, avec cet amendement à l’ordre du jour, l’indépendance de la \nFinancial Crimes Commission est grandement remise en question à travers l’ingérence de la \npolice et le pouvoir du Commissaire de police sur les affaires de la FCC. \nMr Mohamed: To pe badiner la? \nMr Lesjongard: Ce n’est plus la FCC qui décidera… \n(Interruptions) \nMr Mohamed: To kone ki to pe dir la? \n\n96 \n \nMr Lesjongard: … s’il faut ouvrir une enquête ou pas, ce sera à la police.  \nMr Mohamed: Pravind kin dire twa sa? \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Order ! Order!. Let’s listen to him.  \nMr Lesjongard: Et pas plus tard, M. le président, que le 19 juin, le Premier ministre en \nrépondant à une PNQ élaborée sur les mesures qui sont mises en place par le gouvernement \npour réduire les problèmes liés à la situation de law and order dans le pays et il a affirmé \nceci, je cite – \n“We have already started implementing those measures. \n“We are setting up, as I mentioned – I think I did mention – the National Crime \nAgency. It is not just an Agency. It will comprise specialist divisions with skilled \ninvestigators, including foreign ones. At the same time, the National Prosecution \nService would be under the responsibility of the Director of Public Prosecutions.” \nEncore une fois, un engagement du Premier ministre, mais rien. L’honorable Premier \nministre va plus loin en ce qui concerne la police et le bureau du DPP. Il ajoute qu’il faut \néviter le clash entre le Commissaire de police et le DPP. Voilà ce qu’’il avait dit, M. le \nprésident, – \n“You remember the clash between the Commissioner of Police and the DPP. We will \nstop this. Now, with the prosecution service as it is, it is the DPP who will decide who \nwill be prosecuted. Not the Police! The Police can give their views, but it will be for the \nDPP to decide who will be prosecuted or not prosecuted.” \nMais aujourd’hui, on nous présente un projet de loi qui va créer, M. le président, une crise \ninstitutionnelle entre la police et la FCC.  \nAn hon. Member : Li pann comprend narien. \nMr Lesjongard: On a voté il y a quelque temps de cela, le Public Inquiry Act et nous \nsavions tous que la Commission d’’enquête qui existait avant était indépendante. Mais, \naujourd’hui, on nous propose une mainmise de la police sure une autre institution \nindépendante en l’occurrence la FCC, M. le président.     \nMr Jhummun: Beekarry ti independan ein!  \nAn. hon. Member: Kan to ti pe rod pran DPP! \n\n97 \n \nMr Jhummun: Beekarry ti independan… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Order! Order! \nMr Lesjongard: Mon deuxième point, M. le président, est par rapport à l’effectif de la \nFCC et de la police. \nCes derniers temps, il y a eu plusieurs démissions au sein de la FCC. C’est vrai qu’il y a \nun manque de ressources humaines, mais la police aussi est déjà surmenée par la situation de \nlaw and order dans le pays. Elle est aussi en manque d’effectifs. Lors d’un PMQT, c’est-à-\ndire le 4 mars dernier, l’honorable Premier ministre avait fait comprendre à la Chambre qu’il \nexiste plus de 3,000 postes vacants au sein de la force policière. Alors, nous nous retrouvons \navec des institutions qui ont des problèmes de ressources humaines et on leur donne des \nresponsabilités additionnelles.  \nMon autre point, M. le président, est par rapport aux qualifications des agents de police \npour entamer des enquêtes liées au blanchiment d’argent ou de fraude.  \nM. le président, ce projet de loi est le deuxième amendement proposé à la Financial \nCrimes Commission Act sous ce gouvernement. Un certain amateurisme de la part de ce \ngouvernement, M. le président. De mémoire, je n’ai pas connaissance de deux amendements \napportés à une même législation en huit mois. Le comble, M. le président, est qu’au niveau de \nla FCC, on a toujours un Officer-in-Charge. \nM. le président, lors des débats sur la FCC Act en 2023, c’est-à-dire en décembre 2023, \nl’actuel Deputy Prime Minister avait parlé des décisions fondamentales à être prises pour le \nbon fonctionnement de cette institution et que la nomination du directeur général de la FCC \nen faisait partie de ces décisions fondamentales. Il me semble, aujourd’hui, M. le président, \nque ce n’est plus le cas.  \nLe présent projet de loi propose tout simplement des enquêtes conjointes entre la FCC \net la police. M. le président, c’est du déjà-vu. Comme après les élections de 2005, quand \nl’actuel Premier ministre avait présenté deux amendements à la POCA et avait revu la façon \nde nommer le directeur de l’ICAC pour avoir une mainmise sur cette institution. Aujourd’hui, \n20 ans plus tard, la FCC est amendée dans les mêmes conditions. À travers ces amendements, \non nous propose cette fois-ci de permettre au commissaire de police, le bras droit du Premier \nministre, de s’immiscer dans les affaires d’une institution indépendante avec pour seule et \nunique mission de combattre la corruption. \n\n98 \n \nJe dois dire que l’honorable Ritesh Ramful nous avait déjà annoncé la couleur en 2023 \nlors de son intervention. Je cite ce qu’il avait dit – \n« Faites attention. Les rênes de ce monstre sont à présent entre les mains de ce \ngouvernement. Dieu saura ce qui se passera quand ce monstre changera de maître! »  \nMaintenant, on sait que le nouveau maître de la FCC sera le commissaire de police. Le \ncommissaire de police, selon la clause 58A (1) de ce projet de loi, aura le privilège, et je pèse \nmes mots. M. le président, le privilège… \nAn hon. Member: Démagogie ! \nMr Lesjongard: …le privilège de démarrer une enquête sous la FCC Act. Est-ce que \nvous vous rendez compte de ce que vous êtes en train de faire ?  \nDonc, M. le président, demain si l’institution censée être indépendante qui est la FCC, \nqui a trouvé qu’il n’y a pas de lieu d’avoir une enquête sur un cas en particulier parce qu’il ne \nsemble pas y avoir d’offense commise, le commissaire de police, lui, peut démarrer son \nenquête et procéder à des arrestations et mettre des charges provisoires comme bon lui \nsemble. \nIl aura tout simplement qu’à notifier la commission.  \nDire que l’honorable Mohamed nous sortait cette perle en 2023, je cite – \n“I say that no Labour Party government is entitled to have a law like that! No MMM \ngovernment, no alliance government should have this despicable Act in their hands! It \nshould be thrown out! It should be kicked out! And we undertake to throw it out!” \nEt bien non, M. le président! Qu’est-ce qu’on fait aujourd’hui ? On l’améliore. \nMaintenant, le comble, c’est que les amendements à la FCC Act ouvrent une grande porte sur \nles dérives. Ne vous fiez pas aux autres sections qui suivent. C’est simplement du eyewash. \nLe plus important, c’est de permettre au commissaire de police de faire ses propres enquêtes \nsur des cas de corruption alléguée. C’est extrêmement dangereux. \nAprès le démantèlement, M. le président, de l’État-providence, nous assistons, \naujourd’hui, au démantèlement de la lutte contre la corruption et de faire… \n(Interruptions) \nde la FCC… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Order! Order! \n\n99 \n \nMr Lesjongard: …un instrument politique. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Order! \nMr Lesjongard: Maintenant, … \nAn hon. Member: Fer komik! \nMr Lesjongard: Maintenant, on peut parler de ‘monstre’, l’honorable Uteem. \nMs Anquetil: Tu me déçois ! \nMr Lesjongard: Dommage que vous n’alliez pas respecter votre engagement pris dans \ncette même Assemblée en 2023 pour révoquer cette loi. Vous aviez tous sans exception fait le \nprocès de cette loi.  \nCe gouvernement, M. le président, avait même annoncé, je l’ai dit un peu plus tôt, une \nnouvelle institution. Mais on l’attend venir.  \nCette annonce, M. le président, a créé un sentiment d’incertitude à la FCC. Depuis, ils \nsont plusieurs à avoir démissionné ou pris leur retraite anticipée. Ces officiers sont sous \npression. Voilà que désormais, ils auront un nouveau chef en la personne du commissaire de \npolice, l’homme de confiance de l’actuel Premier ministre. \nCet amendement, M. le président, est dangereux. Je ne comprends pas comment \ncertains au sein de l’alliance… \n(Interruptions) \nMr Jhummun: Pann konpran nanye. Nanye to pann konpran! \nMr Lesjongard: …gouvernementale vont s’associer à ce projet de loi. Pourquoi un tel \namendement, M. le président ? Alors que la FCC va être remplacée par une autre institution. \nMalheureusement, ce gouvernement prend des décisions catastrophiques et ce projet de loi en \nfait partie.  \nJ’en ai terminé, M. le président. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. \nMr Jhummun: Au moins ! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Quiet! \nMr Jhummun: Bizin reste ziska la fin la. \n\n100 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. A. Duval! \n(5.08 p.m.) \nMr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne Longue): Thank \nyou. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, first of all, let me say that it is the first time that a debate is \ndone wherein in Parliament, Members are being requested to speak after one another… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Member, do no try to… \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: …when it ought to have been… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do not try to have a… \n(Interruptions) \nDo not try to have a second bite! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Asize do! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Sit down! Sit down! \n(Interruptions) \nDo not try to come back to that issue. Do not try to have a second bite of the cherry. \nI have already given my ruling. If you want to intervene on this Bill, you intervene. If \nyou do not want to, I am going to call the next orator. \nMr Jhummun: Dir pass. \nThe Deputy Speaker: So, you have the floor for the next 15 minutes. \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: Let me say, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, when it came to voting amendments \nto the FCC Bill earlier this year, I was then allowed to refute hon. Ministers. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Address on this Bill! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: To speak after the ... The second thing. \n(Interruptions) \n\n101 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Come to this Bill! Come to this Bill! \nMr A. Duval: No, I am just saying. I will table it. Same for all the other interventions, \nThe Special Allowance Bill, etc., that was not the practise. \nThe Deputy Speaker: No! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: The people… \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: You are again coming back to the same issue! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: The people will draw their conclusion. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. A. Duval! \n(Interruptions) \nHon. A. Duval, sit down! Sit down! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Asize!  \nMr A. Duval: Eta! Ey ale do ta! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Asize! \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members: Asize! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Order! Order! Sit down! \n(Interruptions) \nOrder! Order! Order! \nMs J. Bérenger: Li pena oken respe! \nThe Deputy Speaker: I am making a last appeal to you. You stand up and you address \nthe House on this Bill. \nMs J. Bérenger: Li pa pe respekte... \n\n102 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: If you do not want to address on this Bill, I have no \nalternative… \nAn hon. Member: Dir pass. \nThe Deputy Speaker: …but I will call the next orator according to that list. \nMr A. Duval: Okay, I will take that to other places.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the first issue lies in the manner in which this amendment is \nbeing brought… \nAn hon. Member: Koz la verite, dir lies. \nMr A. Duval: …the manner in which this amendment is being brought. First question, \nwhy was the Parliament Committee on the FCC not apprised of these amendments? When we \nknow that the law provides at Section 129 of the FCC Act subsection (1) and Section 131 \n(1)(e) subsection (iii) that matters pertaining to reforms ought to be brought before the \ncommittee. \nThis was the case when the amendments were brought to introduce the threshold of \nRs500,000 or less which are to be now exclusively undertaken by the Commissioner of \nPolice. But that was not the case for these new amendments. \nSo, the first question – why have we bypassed the Parliamentary Committee? Why \nhave we bypassed the law which provides that it ought to have been brought there first, ought \nto then have been made by a report, recommendations to this Parliament, to Government to \nbring legislative amendments. So, we take note that the Parliamentary Committee now has \nbecome, well, chacun tirera leur conclusion de ce que le comité Parlementaire qui régit la \nFCC est devenu, une farce !  \nDeuxièument, why the urgency? Why bring an amendment under a Certificate of \nUrgency which has only been introduced to Cabinet on Friday, and therefore, has been given \nto hon. Members a few days ago and we are being asked now to ponder on this urgent \nmatter? An urgent matter – this bring me to the core of the issue – which was not so urgent. \nFirstly, at the time of the Budget and at the time of bringing the other amendments which I \nspoke about the introduction of a threshold to unclogged. I will come to it. \nThe first thing first. The spirit of the law behind the FCC; what was the spirit of the \nlaw? It was to have an apex investigative body that had all the means, all the personnel, all \nthe equipment, the surveillance equipment, the special powers under the FCC Act to carry out \n\n103 \n \nsurveillance, to gather information, to call in investigative bodies, in fact, to co-opt people on \nits various boards, co-opt people from outside to have specialised knowledge on, for example, \nfinancial crimes. So, it has been given in the law leeway to do whatever needs to be done so \nthat it can maintain its role as the apex investigative authority.  \nNow this section 58A is now saying, we going to sideline the FCC now. It is no longer \ngoing to be an apex because by definition apex sits at the top, and now, we are going to have \nthe FCC which is going to have basically the same, if not a reduced, role to that of the \nCommissioner of Police who now by default will enquire for cases under Rs500,000 which I \nunderstand. This is logical in fact, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, because when you hear the \narguments brought, you will understand that the reason why such an amendment was needed, \nwas to unclogged the machine, the investigative machine of the FCC to allow it to focus, of \ncourse, on major financial crimes. So then, it was decided and it was a good decision for \nminor offences to be dealt with by the Police. But then also, comes the Budget 2025/2026 \nwhich gives the considerable increase to the budget of the FCC – 38% increase. Of course, so \nthat we allow the FCC to go and recruit personal it needs. In fact, 38% also in staff \nallowances, staff costs. So, the idea in the Budget was to allow the FCC to make use of all the \narsenals it has been given. It was a monster by all means but still on paper, it has all the \nprowess of being an effective apex investigative body. But we increased the budget to 38% \nfor this financial year. \nTherefore, we tell the FCC, we are giving you more money, we are reducing your \ncaseload, we are giving minor offenses to the Commissioner of Police for you to be able to \nfocus on these important investigations that we judge as priorities. But then how do you \nexplain that after all of that, the FCC by the way, with its Rs415 million has, do not forget, \nin-house counsels and attorneys, specialised investigators that have specialised degrees in \ninvestigating financial crimes, that received overseas training sent at the cost of the taxpayer \nto make them better, more efficient investigators. \nThis is where the money is supposed to go, where they have surveillance equipment \nincluding putting people on surveillance, tapping, etc. The FCC has that power in its \nlegislation and there is, of course, the interagency cooperation where, as the apex body, it can \ncall in whoever it wants under section 58 and hold hearings and people have to attend. \nBut on the other hand, we have now the Police. The Police who, do not forget, is \nsupposed to prevent, detect and investigate crimes including the CCID but who sees its \n\n104 \n \nbudget in terms of human resources capacity being cut by 10% from 9431 officers funded for \nthe last financial year down to 8550 officers. So, on the one hand, we are increasing FCC \nbudget, we are telling them go and recruit. Here we are slashing police staff posted to \nprevent, detect and investigate, including the CCID, we are slashing among their ranks and \nwe are now saying that section 58A makes sense. How does it make sense? How, when the \nproliferation of drugs is something which is happening at an unprecedented rate? Violent \ncrime is on the rise. Insecurities are growing concerns in the heart and the mind of every \nMauritian in this country. So, therefore, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Police ought to have had \nother priorities, ought to have put their resources better, in places where they ought to have \nbeen more efficient. \nBut let us come to section 58 now, there are other issues in terms of how it works in \npractice. We know that the FCC, as the apex investigating authority, was not answerable to \nanyone or be it with the amendments that have been brought by this Government which were \ngood amendments, I intervened on those when I was given a proper ranking to intervene after \nministers. I did intervene to say that these amendments were in fact meritorious; to give back \nthe DPP the power to take the decision whether to institute prosecutions or not. \nBut then, as still the apex investigating authority, it is now being asked to work in \ntandem with the Police in two manners. First, for existing investigations, the Police may \nrequest to step in – fair enough under your amendment. The Police, if you will see under this \nsection 58A(1) where the Commissioner of Police considers it will be in the interest of the \nefficient conduct of an investigation into any offence under this Act and that the offense is \nnot already under investigation by the Commission, the Police shall investigate into the \noffence. In fact, I was talking about subsection (3), but this subsection, let me make that point \nnow, where a declaration will now be made at the Police, the CCID for example, if it has \nbeen assigned the file, en tout cas, les Casernes, will have the authority and the mandate to \nopen the investigation themselves for an offence falling under the Financial Crimes Act. You \nlook at it you will see if the FCC is not investigating it, the Commissioner of Police shall do \nit. \nSo, if a declaration is made at les Casernes, it can do it at the outset. It would then be \nfor the FCC to ask the Commissioner of Police to step into the inquiry. Les rôles se sont \nrenversés. Now, for the rest, I was saying where under subsection (5), where the Commission \nand the Commissioner of Police agree that it is in the interest of efficient conduct of the \n\n105 \n \ninvestigation into an offence under this Act, they shall jointly investigate into the offence and \nfor that purpose they shall make suitable arrangements.  \nSo, that will concern ongoing investigations, potentially future investigations opened by \nthe FCC but the matter remains that under subsection (1), the police will, from the outset, be \neligible, be allowed, be enabled to open the inquiry themselves; it would then be for the FCC, \nfor the Commission to request that they join in. This is how it is going to happen. So, is that \nnot infringing, going against the spirit of the law?  \nAnd the questions that are being raised are as follows: will there not be another \npotential conflict between agencies? I will come to it. But first question, when we are talking \nof for example where will the interviews be conducted; interviews of accused, of witnesses; \nwill it be at Ebene? Will it be at Casernes? Where will the files be kept? Are there going to be \ntwo files? Is there going to be one file? In which office is it going to be kept? At the Casernes \nor at the FCC? Who will be recording the statements? These are the questions. \nAnd then you know, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir… \nThe Deputy Speaker: You have got three minutes to go. \nMr A. Duval: …the potential conflict under the investigation that is under section 58A, \nactually the FCC has to refer the investigation to the Commission to make a report and then \nthe report is sent to the DPP but then, now that the Commissioner of Police may investigate \nas well, is he now going to be able to send himself the recommendations for prosecution to \nthe DPP? To send the file to the DPP from the Commissioner of Police’s initiatives himself or \nwill it go under section 58A? Nothing provides for this and this brings me to the same \nconflict that brought this Government to introduce the Bail Act to clarify the powers of the \nDPP and the Commissioner of Police where there was at one point, institutions fighting \namongst one another openly and which was, in fact, a disgrace for our Constitution. \nBut then, we remember for example, the hon. Ag. Attorney General at the time, my \nfriend hon. Shakeel Mohamed, was then the one who brought the amendment to the House \nand he said – \n“The encroachment blurred the lines between investigation…” \nAt that time, he was talking of the DPP and the police investigation and prosecution, two \ndistinct functions assigned by the Constitution to test two separate authorities but what he \nsaid was more interesting about the police. It led to a toxic situation, one where the police and \n\n106 \n \nthe apex prosecuting authority were in open conflict, forced into lawsuits against each other. \nOne where public trust in the justice system eroded as citizens questioned whose orders were \nthe police truly following. One where suspicions of political interference in the detention of \ncitizens were being justified. That was being said for the Bail Act. I will now ask the \nGovernment whether, this risk does not arise, where the conflict between the FCC and the \nCommissioner of Police become another source of open fighting. \nSo, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir… \nThe Deputy Speaker: You may conclude now, please. \nMr A. Duval: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am concluding now… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. \nMr A. Duval: …to say that it is a shame that not enough time was given to Members of \nParliament to look into these amendments, especially since in the past, this manner of doing \nthings had been criticised. Earlier this year, Members of this House came to apologise when a \nCertificate of Urgency was used on another Bill introduced to Parliament where you were \nsaying ‘We apologise, this is not the way of doing things but things are urgent.’ \nI must say, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have not found any compelling argument till now \nto justify why this amendment is being brought under this Certificate of Urgency, having \nbypassed the Parliamentary Commission which has been empowered to make \nrecommendations of these sorts to this House. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Minister Uteem! \n(5.26 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations (Mr R. Uteem): Thank you, Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the country, the nation and the generations to come when \nreading Hansard will remember that on a 15 July 2025 when this Government brought \nlegislation to render investigations into financial crimes more efficient, more effective, the \ntwo Members of the Opposition took position against that law. Why did they take position \nagainst that law? Because this law is going to give power to investigate into malversation \nwhen they were in Government! \n\n107 \n \n(Interruptions) \nThat is why they are objecting! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: He is just replying. He is replying… \nMr Uteem: The hon. Leader of the Opposition comes and reads from our Government \nProgramme and says that we had said that we will take immediate measures to ensure that \nlaw agencies operate in total independence. What was the first Bill that we brought this year? \nWas it not a Bill to amend the Financial Crimes Commission precisely to give the \nindependence, to restore independence to the Director of Public Prosecutions? Was that not \nfast enough? The Leader of the Opposition is telling us that we are taking time to bring the \nBill on the National Crime Agency. We have been here for seven months, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir. When the Financial Crimes Commission which was voted in 2023, do you know \nwhen it was announced by the MSM Government? In 2015! It took you eight  \nyears to come up with the Financial Crimes Commissions and now after eight months, you \nexpect us to come with a new law? And when we are not doing it, you are telling us about \nnotre procès d’intention? \nThis Bill is urgent, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, because there are ongoing investigations, \nthere are potential investigations and the Financial Crimes Commission needs the support of \nthe police to resolve some of these inquiries. This is the reason why we are coming here. And \nwhy are we coming here? The hon. Member did not say a word about the Financial \nTaskforce. Hon. Members would remember how under the MSM Government, the reputation \nof Mauritius as a financial centre, was tainted when the Financial Action Taskforce back on \n21 February 2020, placed Mauritius on its grey list as a jurisdiction under increased \nmonitoring. Soon after, the European Commission placed Mauritius on its black list of \njurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in AML/CFT regime. There were serious deficiencies \nin our anti-money laundering and control of terrorist financing.  \nWhy? If you look at the official communiqué issued by the FATF in February 2020, one \nof the main reasons why Mauritius was placed on the grey list was our inability to \ndemonstrate, and I quote – \n“(…) that law enforcement agencies had the capacity to conduct money laundering \ninvestigation including parallel financial investigation in complex cases.” \n\n108 \n \nWe were unable to carry out financial investigation in complex cases. There was a glaring \nlack of coordination between our law enforcement agencies. Institutions were operating in \nsilos. Critical intelligence was not being shared and investigations were often delayed, \ncompromised due to overlapping mandates and fragmented efforts. \nMay I remind the hon. Member what recommendation 30 of the FATF provides? I \nquote – \n“At least in all cases related to major proceeds‑generating offences, these designated \nlaw enforcement authorities should develop a pro‑active parallel financial investigation when \npursuing money laundering, associated predicate offences and terrorist financing.” \nThis is what we are doing. We are applying what FATF is telling us to do; to allow parallel \ninvestigations.  \nWhat did the Eastern and Southern Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group (ESAAMLG) state \nin its report dated July 2018, which was the basis on which we were grey listed? At paragraph \n6 of page 7, I read – \n“Law enforcement agencies (LEAs) do not conduct parallel financial investigations in a \nmajority of cases, and particularly for offences such as drug trafficking which is a high-\nrisk offence in Mauritius.” \nWe were criticised precisely because the Police and the ICAC then were not doing \nparallel investigation. Today, when we are going to allow the Police and the FCC to conduct \nparallel investigations, you are telling us that we are en train de démanteler la lutte contre la \ncorruption? \nESAAMLG, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, noted that the law enforcement agencies, ICAC, \nnow FCC, the CCID, ADSU and MRA as well as the FIU had been working without proper \ncooperation, coordination and information sharing among themselves. This resulted in \nlengthy and ineffective investigation and very low number of convictions. C’est cela le bilan \ndu MSM. 10 ans! How many persons arrested and convicted for fraud and corruption? \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with the proposed amendment, there would be a proper \ncooperation and coordination between the Police and the FCC. Where the Commissioner of \nPolice agrees that it would be in the interest of the efficient conduct of an investigation into \nan offence, they may jointly investigate the offence with the FCC. When they do so, both the \n\n109 \n \nFCC and the Police will make suitable arrangements for the effective conduct of a joint \ninvestigation. \nIt would appear that hon. Adrien Duval, who left without listening to what I have to say \nabout the points he raised, seemed to have completely overlooked the amendments that have \nbeen circulated. \nMr Jhummun: Li pann konpran! \nMr Uteem: The amendment clearly provides now that it is not going to be a monopoly \nof the Police or the Police taking over the work of the FCC or the Police replacing the FCC as \nan apex body. No! There will be collaboration. The Police “may”, not the police “shall”. The \nPolice “may.” When the Police decides to conduct the investigation, they still have to inform \nthe FCC. The FCC can say to the Police: ‘Let us work together. We conduct the investigation \ntogether. Let us work on a suitable arrangement for the sharing of information.’ It is not that \nthe Police is replacing the FCC. The Police and the FCC will work together where necessary. \nNow, why is that important, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir? Let us take an investigation being \ncarried out by the Police, ADSU, into a drug trafficking offence. They are investigating. They \nare collecting intelligence and arresting people. Then, soon they find out that the proceeds of \nthe crime, the money, have been used to buy a yacht, a Raptor or buildings. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Enn château à Angus Road! \nMr Uteem: So, during the investigation, the proceeds of the crime are identified. At \nthis point in time, what does the Police do? Under the then Prevention of Corruption Act, \nSection 45 (2) provided, I quote – \n“Where in the course of a Police enquiry – \n(a) \nit is suspected that an act of corruption or a money laundering offence has \nbeen committed; and \n(b) \nthe Commissioner of Police is of the opinion that the matter ought to be \ninvestigated by the Commission [ICAC], \n\n110 \n \nthe Commissioner of Police may notwithstanding the Financial Intelligence and Anti-\nMoney Laundering Act 2002 (…) refer the matter to the Commission for \ninvestigation.” \nSo, under the Prevention of Corruption Act, which preceded the Financial Crimes \nCommission, there was this possibility that in the course of investigation, the Police finds that \nan offence may have been committed under another Act which falls under ICAC. At that \npoint in time, the Police could refer, “may” refer. And the Police could continue doing its \ninvestigation. \nWhen the Financial Crimes Commission Act was voted in 2023, Section 56 (3), Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, provides that, I quote – \n“Where in the course of a criminal enquiry, the Commissioner of Police suspects \nthat an offence under this Act or the Declaration of Assets Act has been, is being or is \nlikely to be committed, he shall, [Not he may. He ‘shall.’] subject to subsection (4), \nrefer the matter within 72 hours to the Commission [the FCC] for investigation.” \nSo, here, the word is “shall”. So, as soon as the Police finds out that there is money \nlaundering involved, they do not have any jurisdiction to continue investigation. The two \nexceptions are where there is an investigation in a fraud matter, the value of which is less \nthan Rs500,000 or an investigation in the financing of drug dealing, the value of which is less \nthan Rs500,000.  \nWhy was that done? That was done purposely, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in 2023, to take \naway powers from the Police and give it to the FCC. Why? Because under the FCC law, as \nvoted then, the FCC could close the investigation and not refer it to the DPP. That was the \nreason why the power was withdrawn from the Police and given to the FCC so that they can \nhide and cover up everything. \nHon. Members: Angus Road! \nMr Uteem: So that people like Franklin and others can be protected. \nNow, that we have restored the powers of the DPP, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is only \nnatural that we should restore the power of the Police to conduct an investigation in an \noffence which falls under the FCC Act, where it would be – that is the main tabloid – in the \n\n111 \n \ninterest of the efficient conduct of an investigation. That the Police be allowed to conduct the \ninquiry either together with the FCC or alone, but in coordination with the FCC.  \nWhy is important? It is important because – hon. Adrien Duval himself said so – the \nFCC does not have the financial means which the Police has. Complex cases involving cross \nborder transactions, investigations which require technologically sophisticated equipment and \ntracking devices are involved, the Police are better equipped than the FCC. When there is the \nneed to cooperate with international crimes fighting agencies, again, the Police has treaties \nthat they have signed where it is easier to ask for collaboration for cross border investigations \nif it is done by the Police. For example, Scotland Yard.  \nIf the Police makes a request to Scotland Yard, there is no problem. But if it is the FCC \nwhich does so, then, it has to go through a lot of diplomatic channels before it is able to get \nthe assistance. So, using the Police is not only more efficient, but also timelier. We are not \nsaying that in almost all cases the FCC will now ask the Police for help. But there may be \ncases where the help of the Police would be important. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, no single agency can tackle financial crime effectively if it \nacts alone. The FCC, with its mandate to investigate financial offences, brings specialised \nfinancial expertise and forensic capacity. However, the Police, on the other hand, has broader \ninvestigatory authorities, more operational resources and law enforcement at reach. It is not \nlike competing. Together, they are complementing each other.  \nWe needed to bring this amendment precisely because we did not want any suspect, \nwhen going to court, to argue that the police did not have authority to conduct investigation \nonce there was an offence under the Act because as I have alluded previously, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir, under section 56 (3), the police does not have a choice, he has to give up the \nenquiry if there is an offence suspected to have been committed under the Act, the value of \nwhich is more than Rs500,000. So, in order to avoid any challenge by any suspect, that the \npolice was not entitled to investigate, that is why we are bringing in this piece of amendment \nto plug that loophole. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the hon. Adrien Duval makes the big meal out of the fact that \nthe Parliamentary Committee had not been consulted. Coming from a lawyer, adviser, I am \nvery disappointed because the powers, the functions, the roles of the Parliamentary \nCommittee is governed by the law, by the Financial Crimes Commission Act and under \n\n112 \n \nsection 131 – “Function and powers of the Parliamentary Committee” are there and they \ndon’t have any role in legislative drafting, in suggesting law for joint collaboration. This is \nbeyond their mandate and as primary counsel, let me remind him what was going on when \nthe MSM was in power? There was not even a quorum, even the Members of Government \nwere not attending that Parliamentary Committee. It was never sitting! And now, today, he is \ntelling us, giving us lesson that we ought to have consulted a Parliamentary Committee. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I will end by saying that allowing the police to conduct joint \ninvestigation with the FCC is in the interest of efficiency. This will send a strong signal to the \npublic, to the international community, to the criminals out there that Mauritius is serious, \nunlike the Opposition, this Government is serious about fighting financial crimes, and above \nall, doing what they were unable to do which is securing conviction and recovering ill-gotten \nassets.  \nAllowing proactive parallel financial investigation will also reassure FATF and our \ninternational partners that we are strengthening our AML/CFT regime and this will enhance \nour image as a serious, well-regulated financial centre and the image which has been tainted \nby the MSM government. Never again, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, should anyone ever point \nfingers at our jurisdiction. \nI am done. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Attorney General! \n(5.45 p.m.) \nThe Attorney-General (Mr G. Glover, SC): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, each time I rise \ntowards the end of speeches following a proposal to amend a law, I am as astounded as the \nlast occasion by the lack of precision of the Opposition in bringing out the true issues that \nneed to be debated before this House. \nThe Leader of the Opposition, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, has read the paragraph 10 of the \nGovernment Programme, he read it very well, but that is in contradistinction with his fellow \ncolleague the Whip of the Opposition who seems to have completely forgotten to read the \nproposed amendments to be moved at Committee Stage which led him to make a bit of a hash \nof his intervention as already pointed out by the hon. Member who has just spoken before me. \n\n113 \n \nNow, we have been served with expressions like crise institutionnelle, amateurisme, \nbras droit du Premier ministre, du déjà-vu, all this from the Leader of the Opposition, barely \nis only one thing is that the Leader of the Opposition’s reading of these proposed \namendments est to use the language he likes to use, une lecture simpliste et biaise pour des \nraisons bassement politiques. That the FCC Act is a despicable piece of legislation, is a true \nstatement; that the FCC Act will be repealed is also a truism. What we will do is to bring \nabout a proper legislation, one which reflects our commitment to the rule of law, not what one \nwants to do in order to take control over things.  \nAnd on the matter of control, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the hon. Whip of the Opposition \nis absolutely wrong when he says that there would be a potential conflict between the FCC \nand the Commissioner of Police. The hon. Prime Minister has very clearly set out the \nscenarios which are capable of existing under the proposed amendments and let me at this \nstage go back to what I had planned to say to this House this afternoon. \nThis Government, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir has repeatedly pledged that we shall leave \nno stone unturned in our commitment to strengthen our countries, investigative capabilities \nparticularly against financial crimes. In previous debates, I have emphasized that ensuring a \nfunctional criminal justice system is a priority of ours. The aim being to reconcile the \npreservation of liberty and rights, with balanced the imperatives of security and \naccountability. Today, we revisit these principles through the lens of cooperation between law \nenforcement entities. Why? Because it is important to remind ourselves that although \ninstitutions must operate independently, they must nevertheless act cohesively. \nIndeed, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we must acknowledge that today’s landscape of \nfinancial crimes is more complex than ever. As such all criminal offences involving sums of \nmoney would at some stage also reveal aspects of money laundering or illicit financial flows. \nThe interconnectedness demands, at the very least, cooperation between the police and the \nFinancial Crimes Commission.  \nSo far, we have witnessed, unfortunately, situations where parallel investigation by \nthese two entities though extensively addressing different offences inevitably encroach upon \nthe same set of facts. I, myself, in my career, have argued a number of cases where the police \nwere prosecuting an accused party under certain offences under the Criminal Code whilst at \nthe same time, before a different Division of the Intermediate Court (Criminal Division) the \nsame accused party, on the same facts, was being prosecuted under FIAMLA. This must stop \n\n114 \n \nand this must be dealt with from the time of investigation. The overlap, as my learned friend \nthe hon. Minister Uteem earlier on said, is obvious in cases of drug trafficking where separate \ninvestigations between ADSU and FCC can often lead to different results. A suspect may \nconfess or collaborate with one entity whilst the other is left in the dark and its enquiry goes \nnowhere.  \nThe situation therefore creates duplicated efforts, wasteful expenditure and ultimately \njudicial uncertainty. Our courts would only be able to eventually address such overlaps when \nthey are seized of the matters but even then, the procedural delays in determining whether \ntwo prosecutions relate to the same facts unnecessarily prolong legal uncertainty. And there is \nthe possibility of contrasting, if not contradictory, judgements where one court would believe \nthe FCC’s case but not the case of the police, leading to a situation where the accused is \nconvicted of laundering the proceeds of crime but not convicted of the crime itself. \nAt the same time, some criminal networks exploit those procedural gaps, ultimately \nundermining public trust and confidence in our justice system.  \nThe necessity, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, of joint and coordinated investigations between \nthe FCC and the police, is also a matter of international compliance. The Financial Action \nTask Force in its Recommendation 30, calls upon countries to ensure, and I quote –  \n“… designated law enforcement authorities have responsibility for money laundering \nand terrorist financing investigations within the framework of national AML/CFT \npolicies.” \nIt specifically urges that in all cases related to major proceeds-generating offences, authorities \nshould develop and I quote – \n “a proactive parallel financial investigation.” \nAnd that this should cover cross border predicate offenses.  \nCrucially, it also states that countries should use permanent or temporary \nmultidisciplinary groups specialised in financial or asset investigations. In other words, the \nvery structure of our law enforcement must reflect a capacity for institutions such as the FCC \nand the police to work jointly, swiftly and effectively across jurisdictions and investigative \ntrails. This Bill represents a step towards that alignment.  \nThe proposed joint investigative mechanism stems a practical solution, allowing early-\nstage collaboration to avoid procedural pitfalls and ensure efficient use of resources. It \n\n115 \n \nrespects the distinctive mandate of each entity whilst acknowledging their intersection in the \npractical reality of complex investigations.  \nThe possibility of joint investigations, as outlined in the newly introduced section 58A \nof the Financial Crimes Commission Act, before this House today, allows for clearer, \nstructured co-operation in three distinct scenarios. These three scenarios have been clearly \nspelt out by the hon. Prime Minister in his address. There is no need for me to go over these \nagain. The mechanism provided in the new section 58A is mindful of the inherent \nindependence of the two agencies and not as alleged that one would actually overstep on the \nauthority of the other. Although the default position is the situation when both agencies agree \nto work together, the law provides for other possible situations.  The imperative that can be \ncalled from these amendments is one of efficient collaboration when the circumstances \ndemand.  \nTo summarise, if both the FCC and police do not see the merit of a joint investigation, \nthere will be none. If both decide one is necessary, they are free to pool their efforts freely but \nif ever one of them is of the opinion that a joint investigation is needed and the other agency \nis not so sure, the law will now command co-operation. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the importance in urgency of these amendments is reflected in \nthe fact that we are not waiting for the establishment of the new National Crime Agency to \ninclude them in our law enforcement arsenal. They reflect, n’en déplaise à certains, our \nbroader vision articulated in the Government Programme 2025-2029, which emphasises on \nmodernising and strengthening our justice system, fortifying our investigative frameworks \nand renewing public trust in our law enforcement institutions.  \nBy embedding structured joint investigations in our law today, we are laying a strong \nfoundation for the establishment of the fully functional National Crime Agency that will \ncomprehensively address not just financial crimes but all forms of serious and organised \ncriminal activities. \nIndeed, the UK’s National Crime Agency provides a compelling model, showcasing the \nclear advantages of integrated investigating frameworks, collaborative policing and strategic \nresource allocation. Our collaboration with the UK government expected to run into 2026, \nwill ensure Mauritius benefits fully from what has worked in the UK and the lessons learned \nthere as well. Drawing from such international experience, our amendments today prepare \n\n116 \n \nMauritian institutions to seamlessly evolve into a similarly powerful and effective entity from \nthe outset.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in our previous legislative amendments, notably to the Bail \nAct and the Financial Crimes Commission Act itself, we have consistently aimed to resolve \nambiguity and clarify roles. Just as we saw to rectify the confusion between prosecutorial and \ninvestigative files in the previous amendments to the FCC Act, so too, do we today, aim in \nreinforcing clarity.  \nThis government remains steadfastly committed to ensuring the rule of law remains the \ncornerstone of our democracy. Our institutions must be clear in their purpose, independent in \ntheir operations and co-operative in their execution. \nIn conclusion, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, these amendments are important to our \ncommitment to securing a safe and prosperous future for Mauritius. They form the bedrock \nupon which we will build our future National Crime Agency, ensuring Mauritius remains \nvigilant and resilient against financial and organised crimes for many years to come.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with these words, I commend the Bill to House. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister! \n(5.58 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am sorry for my voice. I sometimes \ndespair that I have to answer these ridiculous things that they say.  \nThe hon. Minister, Reza Uteem, and just before me, the Attorney General have \nresponded so clearly as to why these amendments are being bought. The Leader of the \nOpposition asked why in the Programme we said that a new law, the NCA will be passed, \nand then after seven months, nothing. \nHon. Reza Uteem quite rightly pointed out. They took eight years to do what they said \nthey would do. Eight years! And you are asking me as why in seven months we have not \ndone it! In fact, we explained that there are already people from Scotland Yard who are \nhelping us, police officers, investigative police officers. This is a transitional exercise that we \nare doing until the NCA is properly vetted and ready to be passed. \nThe other ridiculous thing was about the Parliamentary Committee. I think hon. Uteem \nrightly pointed out – since when do we pass legislation after consulting the Parliamentary \nCommittee. It does not. Never! That’s never happened. \n\n117 \n \nMs Anquetil: Incroyable! \nMr A. Duval: Three months ago!   \nThe Prime Minister: It’s ridiculous! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Listen! Listen! \nThe Prime Minister: You should have been here when he spoke, but you were not \nhere. You should have been here. He explained that properly for your benefit.  \n (Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: To pa ti la! \nThe Prime Minister:  Because obviously you are ignorant of all this.  \nMr A. Duval: Three months ago!   \nAn hon. Member: Read the law! \nMr A. Duval: Ask the Junior Minister! \nAn hon. Member: Read the law! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: He told you, read the law.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Order! Order! Let’s listen to the hon. Prime Minister. Come on. \nMs J. Bérenger: Dir li res trankil! \nDr. Aumeer: Li ti al promne deor. Li pann tan repons! \nThe Prime Minister: I would just repeat what I said anyway. Everybody knows why \nthe FCC was passed; everybody knows, including your father because he objected to it. It \nwas not to intensify the combat against fraud, corruption or crimes, whatever. No, it was to \nprotect those who the last government wanted to protect and to harass those they wanted to \nharass. That was the reason; that’s the only reason.  \nI will give you an example. You remember the former Director of ICAC? He said one \nthing and then he went to the usual committee of the Privy Council on MedPoint and said the \nother thing, contradicting ICAC itself! But what hon. Adrien Duval does not seem to know or \nhas forgotten – Angus Road! You know what the FCC did? We had asked for mutual \n\n118 \n \nassistance. When they came to power, they wrote to the UK authorities to say that they are \ncancelling the demand for mutual assistance. \nAn hon. Member: Bez sa! \nThe Prime Minister: They cancelled it for Angus Road so that no investigation is \ndone, because they knew what would have happened. That is what they did. \nMr Mohamed: And you sit next to them! \nThe Prime Minister: Actually, we cannot believe that this was done! And these are the \nvery people who are now telling us what to do and what not to do! I despair, as I said, Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir! Les rôles sont renversés.  \nAs the hon. Attorney General said, they are missing the real issues. They are trying to \ndo politics while missing the real issues.  \nI commend the Bill to the House. \nQuestion put and agreed to.  \nBill read a second time and committed. \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(The Deputy Speaker in the Chair) \nTHE FINANCIAL CRIMES COMMISSION (AMENDMENT) BILL \n(No. XVI of 2025) \nClauses 1 to 3 ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClause 4 (New section 58A inserted in principal Act) \nMotion made and question proposed: “that the clause stand part of the Bill”. \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Chairperson, I move for the following amendment in clause 4 \n– \nIn clause 4, in the proposed new section 58A –  \n(a) \nin subsection (1), by deleting the words “investigation into any offence under \nthis Act that the Police should investigate into the offence” and “shall \ninvestigate” and replacing them by the words “existing or intended investigation \n\n119 \n \ninto any offence that the Police should investigate into an offence under this \nAct” and “may investigate”, respectively; \n(b) \nin subsection (3), by deleting the words “is investigating” and “a suspected \noffence” and replacing them by the words “is investigating or intends to \ninvestigate” and “an offence”, respectively; \n(c) \nin subsection (4), by deleting the words “agree to undertake” and replacing them \nby the words “makes a request for”. \nAmendment agreed to. \nClause 4, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nThe title and enacting clause were agreed to. \nThe Bill, as amended, was agreed to. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Please be seated!  \nOn the Assembly resuming with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair, the Deputy Speaker \nreported accordingly. \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Financial Crimes Commission (Amendment) Bill \n(No. XVI of 2025) was read the third time and passed. \n \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I beg to move that this Assembly do \nnow adjourn to Tuesday 22 July 2025 at 11.30 a.m.  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded.  \nQuestion put and agreed to.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: The House stands adjourned!  \nAt 6.05 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 22 July 2025 at \n11.30 a.m. \n \n \n\n120 \n \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nRODRIGUES REGIONAL ASSEMBLY – ACCOUNTS – PUBLIC FUNDS \nMANAGEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/699",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 699,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/699) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in \nregard to beach erosion in the region stretching from Riambel to Rivière Noire, he will state \nthe measures currently being implemented for the prevention and/or mitigation thereof, giving \ndetails of the estimated costs thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: The Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change \nis implementing an ongoing coastal rehabilitation programme in an integrated and sustainable \napproach. Since 2022, the services of a consultancy firm have been enlisted for a duration of \n60 months to the tune of Rs94.6 million for the design and supervision of coastal protection \nmeasures at 16 priority sites.  \nThe 16 priority sites include, amongst others, coastal regions of Riambel, St Felix, \nRivière des Galets, Bel Ombre, La Prairie, Trou Chenille (Le Morne), La Mivoie, La \nPreneuse, Albion and Souillac Cemetry. Based on the degree of erosion and site specificities, \nthe consultant has recommended specific coastal protection and rehabilitation works which \nwould include hard measures as well as nature-based solutions at those regions at a total \nestimated cost of around Rs1.6 billion.  \nRegarding the sites from Riambel to Rivière Noire, they are currently at the \nconsultancy and design development stage.   \nMoreover, under the “Résilience des écosystèmes côtières des pays du sud-ouest de \nl’Océan Indien’’, commonly known as the RECOS project, at the level of the Indian Ocean \nCommission, with the Ministry as the National Focal Point, an Integrated Coastal Zone \nManagement Plan for the district of Black River is expected to be prepared. The aim is to \nensure sustainable coastal development, enhance ecosystem resilience and address coastal \nerosion through an integrated science-based approach.  \nAn additional component of this regional project is the Jacotet River Pilot Project, led \nby the non-governmental organisation, Reef Conservation, which is adopting a ridge-to-reef \napproach to integrate watershed and coastal zone management in the Bel Ombre region. The \n\n128 \n \nRECOS project started in November 2021 and is expected to end by November 2026, with \npossible extension up to June 2027. \nLE MORNE PUBLIC BEACH – BASIC AMENITIES PROVISION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/700",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 700,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/700) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in regard \nto the Morne Public Beach, especially, at the stretch between the Riu and St Regis hotels, he \nwill state if consideration will be given for the – \n (a) renovation of the existing toilets and provision of electricity and water thereat, \nand  \n(b) \ninstallation of – \n(i) \nshowers;  \n(ii) \nshops for beach hawkers selling food and drinks, and  \n(iii) a mess room for the toilet cleaners.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBAIE DU TOMBEAU – ELECTRICITY PYLON COLLAPSE (29 JUNE \n2025) – INQUIRY & SAFETY ASSESSMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/701",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 701,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/701) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the collapse \nof a concrete electricity pylon on a car on 29 June 2025 at St Joseph, in Baie du Tombeau, he \nwill for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Electricity Board, information as to \nwhether – \n(a) \nan inquiry has been initiated thereinto and, if so, indicate the outcome thereof, \nand  \n(b) \nregular assessment of the state of electricity pylons over the whole network is \ncarried out, indicating if any replacement thereof has been carried out over the \npast five years.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Central Electricity Board (CEB) that the collapse of a \nconcrete electricity pole on a car on Sunday 29 June 2025 at St Joseph Road, Baie du \nTombeau, occurred following an accident where the car crashed into a CEB reinforced \nconcrete pole, resulting in the pole being broken upon impact. \nAs regards to part (a) of the question, I am informed that the accident was reported to \nthe Terre Rouge Police Station and an enquiry is ongoing.  At the level of CEB, the Civil \n\n129 \n \nEngineering Section conducted a technical assessment on 30 June 2025, where it was found \nthat the reinforced concrete pole broke following the impact of the collision.   \nI am informed that the assessment further revealed that there was no deficiency in the \nreinforcement or the structural integrity of the pole.  Verification confirmed that the pole was \nplanted to the required depth in accordance with applicable standards, and the base of the \npole was securely and properly established. I am also informed that the concrete pole was \nreplaced on the same day, that is, on 29 June 2025. \n As regards to part (b) of the question, I am informed that the CEB has a continuous \npole inspection program undertaken across the island to assess and ensure the structural \nintegrity of its utility poles.  As part of this preventive maintenance strategy, some 1,500 to \n2,000 poles, comprising wood, steel and concrete poles are replaced each year based on \ncondition assessments.   \nLIQUID PETROLEUM GAS – AUTOGAS DISPENSERS – SAFETY \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/702",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 702,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/702) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire  & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the number \nof vehicles equipped with Autogas kit using Liquid Petroleum Gas (LPG) as fuel decanted \nfrom cooking gas cylinders, he will state if consideration will be given to request local \npetroleum companies to equip their fuel stations with Autogas dispensers with a view to \nrender the exercise of filling vehicles with LPG safe and, if so, when, indicating the estimated \ncost per kg/litre thereof and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMONTAGNE BLANCHE – NEW FIRE STATION – PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/703",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 703,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/703) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the proposed Construction of a \nNew Fire Station at Montagne Blanche, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nMauritius Fire and Rescue Service, information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPROTECTED SANDALWOOD SPECIES – HARVESTING & TRADE – LICENCES – \nCONSERVATION PROGRAMME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/704",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 704,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/704) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \n\n130 \n \nregard to the protected sandalwood species, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to – \n(a) \nhow the harvesting and trade thereof, including on private land, are regulated, \nindicating the number of licences issued therefor over the past five years and the \nterms and conditions thereof, and  \n(b) \nwhether – \n(i) \nany reforestation, monitoring or conservation programmes are being \nimplemented to ensure sustainable growth thereof, and  \n(ii) \na toughening of the legal or enforcement measures to address illegal \nharvesting and/or export thereof is being considered.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPRINCIPAL MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGISTS – 2025-2026 BUDGET – \nFUNDED POSTS REDUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/705",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 705,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/705) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the reduction in the number of \nfunded posts for the position of Principal Medical Laboratory Technologists (PMLT’s) from \n18 to 12 in the 2025-2026 Budget, he will state the – \n(a) \nreasons therefor, and  \n(b) \nmeasures envisaged, if any, to prevent risks of decline in supervision, technical \nand scientific oversight of the laboratories concerned therewith in the absence of \nPMLTs given the ongoing expansion.",
      "answer": "Reply: There were 18 posts in the grade of Principal Medical Laboratory Technologist \non the establishment of my Ministry during Financial Year 2024-2025, out of which, 12 posts \nwere filled in a substantive capacity, while assignment of duty was given to six permanent \nvacancies. \nHowever, funds have been provided for only 12 posts of Principal Medical Laboratory \nTechnologists in Budget Estimates 2025-2026 instead of 18. \nThe House may wish to note that a recommendation was made to the Public Service \nCommission on 05 June 2025 to fill six vacancies in the grade of Principal Medical \nLaboratory Technologist which were funded in Budget 2024-2025. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, needful is being done for the assignment of duties of \nPrincipal Medical Laboratory Technologist and payment of an ad hoc allowance to ensure \n\n131 \n \nthat there will be no decline in the supervision, technical and scientific oversight of the \nlaboratories. \nConcurrently, approval of the Ministry of Public Service and Administrative Reforms is \nbeing sought for the payment of the appropriate allowance. \n \nCONSTITUENCY NO.13 – INCINERATOR SERVICES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/706",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 706,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/706) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to incinerator services \nin Constituency No.13, Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac, he will state the current status \nthereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nWAKASHIO SHIPWRECK – COMMISSION OF INQUIRY – COMPENSATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/707",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 707,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/707) Mr t. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) ask \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard \nto the Wakashio Shipwreck, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a)  where matters stand as to the – \n(i)  \ninquiry initiated thereinto, and  \n(ii)  payment of the compensation due to people of the South East affected \ntherewith, and  \n(b)  whether the report of the Commission of Inquiry set up to look thereinto will be \nmade public.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMORCELLEMENT AUREA – VERDUN-TERRE ROUGE ROUNDABOUT – \nWIDENING & REINSTATEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/708",
      "sitting_id": "15-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-15",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 708,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/708) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the new Belle Rive \nHermitage Bypass connecting the Verdun-Terre Rouge-Trianon Link Road through the B48 \nRoad, he will state if consideration will be given for the widening and reinstatement of the \n\n132 \n \nB48 Road from Morcellement Aurea to its junction with the Verdun-Terre Rouge roundabout \nand, if so, indicate the expected start and completion dates thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-15-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/709",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 709,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/709) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the police inquiry \ninitiated in 2020 into alleged malpractices surrounding the transfer of foreign football players by \nthe Cercle de Joachim, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of \nPolice, information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that \non 24 July 2020, the then Ministry of Labour, Human Resources Development and Training had \nreferred for enquiry, an alleged case of malpractice at the Mauritius Football Association \nregarding the transfer of four Malagasy players by the Cercle de Joachim. \nOn 31 July 2020, the case was assigned to the Central Criminal Investigation Department. \nOn 09 September 2021, the case file was sent to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions \nfor advice. On 07 April 2022, the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions advised that no \nfurther action be taken, and the case was filed. \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente, j’ai bien compris la réponse de l’honorable ministre. \nMais vu que… \nMadam Speaker : Du Premier ministre ! Du Premier ministre ! \nMr Quirin: Pardon ! Du Premier ministre ! Pardon, excusez-moi.  \nJ’ai bien compris sa réponse. Mais le fait que ce cas a été sanctionné par la Fédération \ninternationale de football et que la MFA et le Cercle de Joachim ont eu à payer une amende de \n\n17 \n \n \n10 000 francs suisses en 2021, est-ce que l’honorable Premier ministre ne pense-t-il pas, vu qu’il \ny a eu effectivement des malpractices, est-ce que ce cas ne devrait pas être référé à nouveau à la \npolice pour une enquête additionnelle/supplémentaire pour faire la lumière vraiment sur ce qui \ns’est passé ? Puisqu’il y a eu des malpractices. \nThe Prime Minister: I understand what the hon. Member is trying to say, but the DPP had \nlooked at all the evidence or whatever and decided that the case should not go ahead. So, I must \nrely on that. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Fizet sa! \nMadam Speaker: Okay. The Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle, hon. \nSeeburn! \nMAURITIAN RUPEE DEPRECIATION – ECONOMIC IMPACT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/710",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 710,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/710) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the exchange \nrate of the US dollar vis à vis the Mauritian rupee, he will state the rate thereof in December \n2014 and October 2024, respectively, indicating whether the depreciation of the rupee \ncontributed to the rise in the costs of goods and services locally and, if so, whether instances of \nmismanagement or negligence in economic or monetary decision-making contributed thereto.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the gross economic mismanagement by the \nprevious government during the past decade has severely undermined our macroeconomic \nfundamentals, and we all know this. It has led, amongst others, a sharp depreciation of the rupee \nand an increase in the inflation rate, and therefore, the cost of living. \nIn fact, in December 2014, the average exchange rate stood at 31.97 rupees against the US \ndollar. By October 2024, that is, practically ten years later, it had risen to 46.64 rupees per US \ndollar, reflecting a depreciation of the rupee by 46 per cent. \nThis significant depreciation of the Mauritian rupee has had far-reaching economic \nconsequences.  \nOn the domestic front, it has intensified inflationary pressures, and therefore, raised the \ncost of goods and services.  Inflation surged to a peak of 11.3 per cent in February 2023. It was \n\n18 \n \n \nthe highest level for three decades. 11.3 per cent! Between December 2014 to October 2024, \nconsumer prices in Mauritius increased by a dramatic 43.3 per cent. \nOn the external front, the depreciation of the rupee has contributed in the widening of the \ntrade deficit, which stood at a high of Rs180 billion, equivalent to 28.2% of GDP, in 2023.  It \ndeteriorated further in 2024, rising from Rs180 billion to Rs207.8 billion, that is, 29.9% of GDP. \nThis reflects the growing imbalances between imports and exports. \nMadam Speaker, as I have said on numerous occasions in this House, the dire economic \nsituation we face today is a direct consequence of the gross mismanagement of the economy by \nthe previous government. It reflects a striking level of amateurism and incompetence in the \nhandling of the country’s economic affairs, exposing a troubling lack of foresight, and, as I said, \ncompetence. \nLet me highlight a few glaring examples of flawed monetary policies – \n(a) \nFirst of all, the Bank of Mauritius decided to print money to finance the budget \ndeficit; \n(b) \nSecondly, the Bank of Mauritius further resorted to more money printing to finance \nthe Mauritius Investment Corporation Ltd.  \nOverall, the Bank of Mauritius injected a total amount of Rs180 billion of liquidity \nin the banking system. As a result, excess liquidity in the banking system surged \ndramatically to an unprecedented Rs90 billion in August 2023 alone.  This led to a \ndepreciation of the rupee, and, of course, intensified inflationary pressures within \nthe local economy; \n(c) \nThird, the increase in the policy rate by a cumulative 265 basis points during 2022 \nwas not enough to solidly anchor inflation expectations and prevent the further \ndepreciation of the rupee; and \n(d) \nFourth, despite expert recommendations to raise the key rate, the Bank of Mauritius \nchose not only to ignore the expert recommendation, but it did exactly the opposite. \nIn other words, instead of increasing, it decreased the key rate from 4.5 per cent to \n4 per cent in September 2024. \n\n19 \n \n \nNow, this negative interest rate gap between the rupee and the US dollar caused a sharp \ndepreciation again of the rupee.  \nLet me now turn to some of the critical policy blunders of the previous regime – \n(a) \nFirst, they favoured an economic model based on reckless consumption and \nimports.  Such a model, built on short-term gains rather than structural resilience, \nwas inherently unsustainable and ultimately detrimental to our economic stability. \n(b) \nSecondly, they created a money illusion by giving away a range of allowances and \ncash handouts.  They opted for populist policies that provided short-term relief, but \ncontributed to increasing inflation. \n(c) \nThird, they squandered public funds on costly white elephant projects, neglecting \ncritical investments in productive infrastructure, innovation, and the green \ntransition. \n(d) \nFourth, with the reckless spending, they increased the budget deficit and brought \nthe public sector debt to 90 per cent of GDP in June 2025. \nMadam Speaker, since assuming office, we have implemented a series of measures aimed \nat steering the economy back onto the path of stability and sustainable growth. \nWe are shifting the economic model away from one that relies heavily on consumption and \nimports, towards a more sustainable model powered by investment, exports and innovation. \nWe have been able to stabilise the trade-weighted exchange rate of the rupee.  In fact, the \nrupee has recently appreciated against the US dollar due to movements in the international \nmarkets. \nThe headline inflation rate has gone down to 2.9 per cent. During the 12 months period, it \nwas 4.5 per cent in June 2024. \nAnd, finally, we are implementing a comprehensive fiscal consolidation plan to bring \ndown the budget deficit and the public sector debt to more sustainable levels. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, next question! Third Member for Montagne Blanche and GRSE! \nDr. Saumtally! \n\n20 \n \n \nMAURITIAN DIASPORA SCHEME – COMPANIES ACT AMENDMENT – \nREGISTRATION REQUIREMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/711",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 711,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Dr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/711) Dr. R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Mauritian \ndiaspora, he will state if, with a view to attracting the engagement of skilled members thereof in \nthe development of the Mauritian economy, consideration will be given for the amendment of \nsection 132 of the Companies Act which requires every company to have at least one Director \nordinarily residing in Mauritius under the Self-Employed category of the Mauritian Diaspora \nScheme, requiring applicants to register a one-person company.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the Mauritian Diaspora Scheme has been set up in \n2015 to attract members of the Mauritian diaspora back to Mauritius to participate in the \neconomic development of the country.   \nThe Mauritian Diaspora Scheme which is managed by the Economic Development Board, \nrequires an eligible member of the Mauritian diaspora who wishes to return to Mauritius as a \nself-employed, to invest at least Rs250,000 either in his own name or as a one-person company, \nin a field of activity which is deemed to be scarce, innovative or strategic. \nI am informed by the Economic Development Board that currently 550 members of the \nMauritian diaspora are benefitting from this Scheme out of which 170 are self-employed. Out of \nthe 170 self-employed, only 5 are one-person companies. \nUnder the Mauritian Diaspora Scheme, a self-employed investing through a one-person \ncompany needs to become a resident in Mauritius to benefit from the incentives of the Scheme. \nThe one-person company should also be a private company incorporated in Mauritius in which \nthe sole shareholder is the sole director of the company as per the Companies Act.  \n Furthermore, section 132 of the Companies Act, requires that a company should have at \nleast one director who is ordinarily resident in Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker, it is not proposed to amend section 132 of the Companies Act at this \npoint to relax the requirement for at least one director to be resident in Mauritius, as this \n\n21 \n \n \nrequirement applies not only to one-person companies but to all types of companies registered in \nMauritius.  \nThis is an established international principle which can be compared with other \njurisdictions. Enforcing this requirement is vital to strengthen our regulatory framework for \ncompanies and also to facilitate administrative procedures.  \nIt ensures that there will be a person, that is a director, who is physically present in \nMauritius to represent the company and be answerable to our enforcement authorities in the \nevent of any breach by that company. \nMadam Speaker, however, I wish to reassure the hon. Member that as I have announced in \nthe Budget Speech 2025-2026, a new and comprehensive strategy is currently being developed in \ncollaboration with the Economic Development Board to make the Scheme less restrictive.   \nWe will thus facilitate the return of our valuable Mauritian diaspora members to contribute \nto the development of our country. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, next question, the hon. Fourth Member for Port-Louis \nNorth & Montagne Longue! \nBANK OF MAURITIUS – GOVERNOR & DEPUTY GOVERNORS – \nREMUNERATION & ALLOWANCES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/712",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 712,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/712) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the current Governor and Deputy Governors of the Bank of Mauritius, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, in each case, obtain information as to the remuneration drawn, including \nother allowances/benefits received, whether in cash or in kind and as chairperson or member of \nother Boards or Committees of public institutions.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the Bank of Mauritius is an autonomous and \nindependent body governed by the provisions of the Bank of Mauritius Act 2004. \nAs a matter of fact, section 3(3) of the Bank of Mauritius Act provides that the Bank of \nMauritius shall, in the furtherance of its objects, “perform its functions independently”.  Section \n12(1) of the Act further provides that –  \n\n22 \n \n \n“(1) \nThe general policy of the affairs and business of the Bank, other than the \nformulation and determination of monetary policy, shall, (…) be entrusted to a Board of \nDirectors.” \n \nIn addition, Madam Speaker, section 12(3) of the Act provides that the Board shall not be \nsubject to the direction or control of any other person or authority in the exercise of its functions. \nBut let me inform the House that the remuneration of the Governor and the Deputy \nGovernors are actually disclosed in the financial statements of the Bank of Mauritius, which are \npublicly available on the website of the Bank. \nMr A. Duval: May I? \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nMr A. Duval: The question I also asked, first of all, I take note that the hon. Prime \nMinister will not provide these details to the House. However, the Financial Services \nCommission, for example, where some of them are appointed, at least one of them, he could \nhave disclosed that information.  \nLet me nonetheless ask the hon. Prime Minister whether he is prepared to consult the Bank \nof Mauritius for a review in the name of keeping foreign currency in Mauritius, the astronomical \nfigures of per diem that is paid to the Governor, for example, when he travels, which amounts to \nUSD1400 apparently and USD200 for entertainment allowance, Rs73,000 but paid in dollar. Is \nthat something that he is prepared to review? \nThe Prime Minister: That is not part of the question, Madam Speaker, and I did say that if \nyou want to get all the information, it is on the financial statement of the Bank of Mauritius on its \nwebsite. \nMadam Speaker:  Next question, the hon. First Member for Savanne & Black River, Mr \nBabajee! \nLA PASSE, WEST COAST – DRUGS – ARRESTS & INQUIRIES – SAFE CITY \nSURVEILLANCE SYSTEM CAMERAS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/713",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 713,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/713) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \n\n23 \n \n \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to drugs, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to – \n(a) \nthe number of arrests effected on the West Coast in connection therewith over the \npast five years, indicating –  \n(i) \nif the arrested persons are Mauritian or foreign nationals, and \n(ii) \nwhere matters stand as to the inquiries initiated thereinto, and \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given for the installation of Safe City Surveillance \nSystem Cameras on the four entrances of “La Passe”.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, in regard to parts (a) and (a)(i) of the question, I \nam informed by the Commissioner of Police that, between 2020 and 18 July 2025, 117 drug \ncases have been detected in the West Coast leading to the arrest of 163 suspects, of whom, 146 \nare of Mauritian nationals and 17 of foreign citizens. \nAs for part (a)(ii) of the question, I am informed that inquiries are in progress in all these \ncases. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, concerning the possible installation of Safe City \nSurveillance Cameras at the roads leading to the four entrances of La Passe, I am informed that \nthere are 204 Safe City Cameras installed at key locations, as well as policing by 11 Police \nStations and 7 National Coast Guard Posts.  Regular foot, mobile, sea and aerial patrols by the \nNCG personnel as well as by the Dornier aircraft and Police helicopters, also help monitor the \ncoastal regions. \nHowever, the region is monitored by three Coastal Surveillance Radar System (CSRS) \nstations located at Le Morne, Albion, and Grand Gaube. These operate on a 24-hour basis and \nprovide real-time data on vessel movements. A more advanced CSRS, donated by the \nGovernment of Japan, is expected to be operational by October or November of next year, and \nwhich will offer significantly enhanced surveillance capacity. \nIn addition, with a view to enhancing our maritime surveillance, Mauritius continues to \ncollaborate with regional maritime centres namely, the Regional Maritime Information Fusion \nCentre (RMIFC) in Madagascar and the Regional Coordination Operations Centre (RCOC) in \nSeychelles.  \n\n24 \n \n \nI also wish to inform the House that, in February 2024, Mauritius signed a bilateral \nagreement with Reunion Island to strengthen cooperation in the fight against drug trafficking and \nthe use of maritime routes for smuggling. \nGiven the current surveillance framework in place, Madam Speaker, and the enhancements \nalready underway, the question of installing additional Safe City cameras along the West Coast \ncovering the roads leading to the four main “La Passe” would best be addressed by the outcome \nof a comprehensive risk and threat assessment which is ongoing. The matter remains under \nconsideration, and further reinforcement measures will be taken as and when deemed \noperationally necessary. \nMadam Speaker:  The hon. Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or, Mr \nBeejan! \nDUBAI EXPO 2020 – DELEGATION – ALLOWANCES & PER DIEM",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/714",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 714,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/714) Mr N. Beejan (The Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre D'or) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands  whether in regard to the Dubai \nExpo 2020, he will state the names of the former Ministers, Parliamentary Private Secretaries \nand Members of Parliament who attended same, indicating in each case, the total participation \ncost thereof, giving details as to the – \n(a) \nduration of stay; \n(b) \nper diem or any other allowance drawn, and \n(c) \ncomposition of the delegation.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the Dubai Expo 2020 was held from October 2021 \nto March 2022.   \n Dubai Expo 2020 was clearly a ‘Travel Folly’ by the former ministers using taxpayers’ \nmoney at a time when the Mauritian people were reeling under the impact of the COVID-19 \npandemic; most families were financially in difficulty but also worried about the COVID-19. \nThese people were travelling on taxpayers’ money. I hope you ask me a question next time on \nthis. \nMr A. Duval: I hope to get the answer. \n\n25 \n \n \nThe Prime Minister: You are getting the answer. \nI am informed that 11 ministers of the previous government, together with their \naccompanying delegations, attended the Dubai Expo 2020.   \nThree former Ministers, I did say 11 ministers but three former ministers, namely, Dr. \nRenganaden Padayachy, former Minister of Finance, Economic Planning and Development; Mr \nD. Balgobin, former Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation, and \nMr S. Bholah, former Minister of Industrial Development, SMEs and Cooperatives, attended the \nsame Expo twice.  \nExplain to me why. Why did they have to go twice?  \n(Interruptions) \nThe total participation cost of the ministerial delegations amounted to Rs8,252,970.89. \nMs Anquetil: Profiteur! \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the list is very long. It will take a lot of time. I \nthink it is better to table the list together with the duration of the stay, the per diem and other \nallowances drawn. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, one question.  \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Prime Minister inform what criteria \nwere used to select attendees of Dubai Expo because now it is the time for us to expose the \nformer Government as so much of public… \nMadam Speaker: Question! Question! \nMr Beejan: …funds have been used. \nMadam Speaker: Wait! Don’t make a statement! \nMr Bhagwan: Swazirer dan la kwizinn sa! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Ask your question… \nYou finished? Yes! \n(Interruptions) \n\n26 \n \n \nYes, Prime Minister! \nThe Prime Minister: As I said, there was no criteria. We cannot see any criteria. Why \nwould somebody have to go twice? Three Ministers went twice and they went with delegations. \nThis is why I will table it. There was as I called it, a ‘travel folly’. It was an occasion for them. \nPeople were dying with COVID here, they could not give a damn – I was going to say something \nelse – and they just travelled, enjoyed… \nMs Anquetil: La honte! \nThe Prime Minister: …because gouvernman dan nou lame, fer seki zot le! \nMs Anquetil: La honte! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, I have a question! \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, I have one! \nMadam Speaker: Yes? What do you have? A supplementary? Okay! \nMr A. Duval: I am glad that the Prime Minister is prepared… \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Do not comment! He should put his question. Ki comment? \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: …to table… \nMadam Speaker: Please! Don’t do the same… \nMr A. Duval: It is not a comment! \nMadam Speaker: No, give me a question! \nAn hon. Member: Shut up! \nMr A. Duval: Ki shut up ta? Li pe dir ou shut up ! \nMadam Speaker: Non! \nMr A. Duval: Alors, is he… \nMadam Speaker: We were doing very well so far. \n\n27 \n \n \nMr A. Duval: I am… Well, il ne doit passer des commentaires comme ça. S’il ne veut pas \ntravailler, qu’il aille à la maison ! \n(Interruptions) \nQu’il aille à la maison ! \n(Interruptions) \nCombien de temps on va permettre encore comme ça ? \n(Interruptions) \nMa question… \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Member! \nMr A. Duval: La question c’est… \nMadam Speaker: You were asking a question. Please, carry on! \nMr A. Duval: La question au Premier ministre, c’est je suis ravi qu’il va donner les détails. \nJ’espère qu’il puisse prendre l’engagement ici de donner des détails systématiquement à toutes \nles questions qui reportent sur les voyages… \n(Interruptions) \nMr Mohamed: Tout depend…. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: What is the question, Madam Speaker? \nMr A. Duval:…parce que la dernière fois, je n’ai pas eu… \nMadam Speaker: Non ! Non ! Non ! \nMr A. Duval: …les informations ! \nMadam Speaker: It is not a question! \nMr A. Duval: The question is: is he prepared to do it systematically? \nMr Lesjongard: Whether there is transparency on the…. \nMr A. Duval: Transparency that is… \n(Interruptions) \n\n28 \n \n \nMadam Speaker: Prime Minister! \nThe Prime Minister: The hon. Member seems to forget… \nMadam Speaker: Try to answer to his question. \nThe Prime Minister: I have always given all the details except for the Bank of Mauritius \nwhich I just… Always, you ask any question you want to ask, I will be giving all the details of \nthe amount of money they spent. It is criminal. These people should be hanged. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Quartier Militaire… \n(Interruptions) \nI do not want to say the word ‘shut up’ again. \nMr A. Duval: You are getting contaminated. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Give me on second! I will take this time to apologise for last time when \nI could not bear it anymore and I said ‘shut up’ which is not a parliamentary word. So, I am now \napologising to the House but do not push me too far. Please! \nDr. Ms Thannoo, please! \nCYBERCRIME UNIT – REPORTED THREAT CASES – EFFICIENT SERVICE \nDELIVERY – ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/715",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 715,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/715) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nCybercrime Unit, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, \ninformation as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of reported cases thereat over the period 2014 to 2024, indicating the number \nof – \n(i) \nresolved cases, and  \n(ii) \npending cases, since 2014 to date, indicating the reasons therefor and  \n\n29 \n \n \n(b) \nmeasures taken, if any, for improved, efficient and rapid service delivery.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, in regard to part (a)(i) and (ii) of the question, I am \ninformed by the Commissioner of Police that for the period 2014 to 2024, 3,337 cases have been \nreported to the Cybercrime Unit and their outcome are as follows – \n(i) \n111 cases have been resolved; \n(ii) \n147 cases are awaiting advice from the DPP; \n(iii) 14 cases are awaiting trial;  \n(iv) 889 cases are still under inquiry as at 18 July of this year, and \n(v) \n2,176 cases have been filed. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am further informed that the following measures have \nbeen put in place for the improved, efficient and rapid service delivery by the Cybercrime Unit – \n(i) \nSignificant increase in staffing, from 13 in 2014 to 21 in 2025, to handle multiple \ninvestigations simultaneously. Regular training of those officers, inter alia, on \nemerging cybercrime trends and digital evidence handling is going on; \n(ii) \nStrengthened collaboration with local agencies such as the CERT-MU and ICTA, as \nwell as with international law enforcement bodies, to accelerate investigations \nincluding direct 24/7 contact channels with platforms like Facebook and TikTok to \nexpedite requests; \n(iii) Action through CERT-MU for the removal of illegal online content and 24/7 cyber \npatrols by the Police IT Unit to monitor and detect suspicious online activity, \n(iv) The Digital Forensic Lab at the Police IT Unit is now operational on a 24/7 basis to \nenable prompt analysis of electronic evidence. \nMadam Speaker, the House will appreciate that the issue of cybercrime is a complex \nchallenge being faced worldwide. The collaboration of each stakeholder as well as that of the \npublic is required to combat this scourge. The Government is fully committed to continuously \nenhancing the capacity of our institutions to respond effectively to the ever-evolving cybercrime \nthreats. In that respect, as I mentioned, a specialised unit is currently being set up to focus \nspecifically on cybersecurity-related issues, with technical assistance from external expertise. \n\n30 \n \n \nThese efforts are part of a broader strategy to modernise policing and safeguard our digital \nenvironment. As stated in the Government Programme of 2025-2029, the Ministry of \nInformation Technology, Communication and Innovation is also considering amendments to be \nmade to the Cybersecurity and Cybercrime Act to strengthen provisions on Auditing of Critical \nSectors and Child Online Protection due to the evolving nature of the cyber threats landscape. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? You are happy?  \nOkay, so B/718 has been withdrawn.  \nSo, now we have the hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues, Mr Edouard! \n \nIMPORTED VEHICLES – NEW DUTIES & TARIFFS – 01 JULY 2025 – EXEMPTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025",
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/716",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 716,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/716) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the new duties and \ntariffs applicable on imported vehicles with effect from 01 July 2025, he will state if \nconsideration will be given for the exemption thereof in respect of the vehicles shipped prior to \nthe abovementioned cut-off date as evidenced by their respective bills of lading.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCSG INCOME ALLOWANCE – NON-SUBMISSION CSG RETURNS –PAYMENT \nDEPRIVATION – COMPLAINTS & MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/717",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 717,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/717) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime Minister, \nMinister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister \nfor Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Social Contribution (CSG) Income \nAllowance, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Revenue Authority, \ninformation as to the number of complaints received from employees deprived of the payment \nthereof due to their employers failing to submit their return on CSG since January 2025 to date, \nindicating the measures taken, if any, against the defaulting employers.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the Social Contribution and Social Benefits Act \nprovides for the payment of the monthly CSG Income Allowance to an eligible employee only if \n\n31 \n \n \nthe employer has submitted the relevant returns and has paid or remitted to the Mauritius \nRevenue Authority – \n(a) \nboth the employer’s and the employee’s CSG contributions; \n(b) \nthe contribution to the National Savings Fund; \n(c) \nthe Human Resource Development Council training levy, and \n(d) \ncontributions to the Portable Retirement Gratuity Fund. \n I am informed by the MRA that for the period from January 2025 to date, 1,634 \ncomplaints have been received from employees who were not paid their CSG income allowance \nbecause their employers, 1,150 in total, did not comply with the statutory requirements. Out of \nthese complaints, 22 relate to employees in Rodrigues and concern 19 defaulting employers.  \nI am informed, Madam Speaker, by the MRA that through enforcement actions, out of the \n1,634 complaints, 1,456 including the 16 complaints from Rodrigues have already been resolved. \nThe MRA has paid the CSG income allowance to 1,444 of those employees and will effect \npayment for the remaining by this week.  \nFor the remaining 178 employees including 6 cases that are from Rodrigues, the MRA is \ntaking action to initiate legal proceedings against the 82 employers concerned. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Now I have the hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues, Mr \nEdouard! \nPLACES OF WORSHIP – VANDALISM – REPORTED CASES – CONVICTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/718",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 718,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/718) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to acts of vandalism of \nplaces of worship, including kalimayes, temples, mosques, churches, and other religious sites, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the \nnumber of reported cases thereof over the period January 2015 to October 2024, indicating, in \nconnection therewith, the number of persons – \n(a) \narrested, and  \n(b) \nconvicted, if any. \n\n32",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIUS-FRANCE FRAMEWORK AGREEMENTS – WATER SECTOR \nCOOPERATION – LOAN ASSISTANCE QUANTUM",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/719",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 719,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/719) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime Minister, \nMinister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister \nfor Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the framework agreements signed between \nthe Government of the Republic of Mauritius and of France, including from the Agence \nFrançaise de Développement, focusing on strengthening cooperation in the water sector, he will \nstate the quantum of the loan assistance received, giving details of the projects earmarked for \nimplementation thereunder in mainland Mauritius and in Rodrigues, respectively.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with regards to the water sector, the Government of \nMauritius has signed the following agreements with the Agence Française de Développement \nsince 2019 to date – \n(i) \nFirst, a Technical Assistance of Euro 600,000, signed on 05 September 2019, to \nsupport the water sector in Mauritius and Rodrigues. Under this assistance, the \nRodrigues Water Resources Strategy and priority action plan were developed, \namongst others. \n(ii) \nSecond, a Technical Assistance of Euro 1.3 million, signed on 26 February 2024, for \na study in Rodrigues, on the depth and volume of freshwater aquifers for the \ndevelopment of new boreholes. \n(iii) \nThird, a Technical Assistance of Euro 800,000, also signed on 26 February 2024, out \nof which, Euro 462,640 is for the development of a strategy for rainwater \nmanagement and flood risk prevention on the island of Rodrigues and the remaining \nto develop a strategy to improve water absorption capacity of soil in Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker, on 01 December 2023, the Government of Mauritius also signed a Sector \nBudget Support Loan Agreement with AFD for reform in the water sector in Mauritius and \nRodrigues. The quantum of the loan is Euro 200 million. \nThis \nSector \nBudget \nSupport \nLoan \nis \ncoupled \nwith \na \ngrant \nof  \nEuro 2 million. This grant is being used to finance the elaboration of water policy for Mauritius, \n\n33 \n \n \nimproving water quality in Rodrigues and a Technical Adviser providing support to the Ministry \nof Energy and Public Utilities and the Rodrigues Public Utility Corporation. \nWith respect to the projects earmarked under this loan assistance, I would like to highlight \nthat the loan from AFD is a Sector Budget Support Loan. The financing from a Budget Support \nLoan is not earmarked for specific projects. \nAccordingly, the proceeds of the loan are directly credited to the Consolidated Fund and \ncontribute to the financing of the various projects and programmes in the water sector for both \nMauritius and Rodrigues. \nAs per the Sector Budget Support Loan agreement, disbursements are linked to Key \nPerformance Indicators in the water sector, again, for both Mauritius and Rodrigues. So far, Euro \n105 million has been disbursed under the loan agreement. \nMadam Speaker, over and above the financing from AFD, there are several projects for the \nwater sector that are being implemented for both Mauritius and Rodrigues. The main ones are as \nfollows – \nFor Mauritius, Rs3.1 billion which includes – \n(i) \nRs1.4 billion for the construction of the Rivière des Anguilles Dam; \n(ii) \nRs1.2 billion for pipe replacement projects; \n(iii) Rs100 million for the rehabilitation of La Ferme Dam;  \n(iv) Rs50 million for the upgrading of Piton du Milieu Water Treatment Plant;  \n(v) \nRs73 million for the construction and upgrading of pumping stations at Poudre d’Or \nand Plaine Lauzun; \n(vi) Rs100 million for containerised filtration plants, drilling of boreholes and \nmaintenance of feeder canals, and \n(vii) Rs50 million for the replacement of Bulk Water Meters. \nFor Rodrigues – \n(i) \nRs216.3 million has been provided in the Budget of the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly for FY 2025-2026. These funds are mainly to meet the operating cost of \n\n34 \n \n \nthe Commission responsible for water, Rodrigues Public Utilities Corporation \n(RPUC), and the Rainwater Harvesting Scheme.  \n(ii) \nRs540 million for two desalination plants, distribution networks and metering \nfinanced from MIC. \n(iii) USD 10 million, which amounts to about Rs457 million, a grant from World Bank \nand European Union, to support Rodrigues’ sustainable development with a \nparticular focus on water and food security. \nMadam Speaker, let me reassure the House that we are not leaving Rodrigues behind. Not \nat all! Over Rs1 billion has been earmarked for the water sector for the next two financial years \nin Rodrigues. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much, hon. Prime Minister.  \nTime is now up! I will give a list of all the PQs that have been withdrawn: B/721, B/725, \nB/726, B/727, and B/729. Thank you. \nNow, I am calling PQs addressed to Ministers.  \nThe hon. Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue, Mr Caserne! \nMFRS HEAD OFFICE & FIRE STATIONS – PROPOSED \nCONSTRUCTION/RELOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/720",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 720,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/720) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Export Incentive \nSchemes which Government has decided to gradually phase out over a two-year period, as \nannounced in the Budget Speech 2025-2026, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \nthe Economic Development Board, information as to the measures taken, if any, to mitigate the \nimpact thereof on the local economic operators.",
      "answer": "Reply: I wish to inform the House that Export Incentive Schemes introduced by the \nprevious government, namely the Trade Promotion and Marketing Scheme, the Freight Rebate \nScheme, the Export Credit Guarantee Insurance Scheme, and the SME Refund Scheme for \nParticipation in International Fairs were temporary measures and were supposed to end in June \n2025.  This is clearly mentioned in the guidelines issued in July 2024 by the Economic \nDevelopment Board for these schemes. The schemes may be terminated or amended at any time.  \nIt is important to note that subsidies under World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules must \nbe time-bound and cannot be granted on a permanent basis.  To align with WTO obligations and \nas part of our broader economic restructuring objectives aimed at enhancing competitiveness, \nreducing inefficiencies, and ensuring fiscal discipline, the four main Export Incentive Schemes \nwill be gradually phased out over the next two years.   \nFurthermore, I am informed by the EDB that large companies have benefited from these \nschemes substantially more than the SMEs.  It has also been observed that the same companies \nbenefit from these schemes year after year. \nI wish to highlight that the Sea Freight Rebate Scheme for the transport of goods from \nMauritius to Rodrigues is being maintained. \nAs part of a broader shift toward long-term competitiveness and innovation-led export \ngrowth, Government is introducing a new set of measures to support local operators, namely – \n(i) \nA review by the EDB of the existing export promotion model to fully capitalise \non the new market opportunities arising from the implementation of the \nComprehensive Economic Cooperation and Partnership Agreement with India, \nthe Free Trade Agreement with China, and the African Continental Free Trade \nArea; \n\n130 \n \n \n(ii) \nA new ‘En Route vers l’International’ Scheme to be launched in the form of a \nmatching grant to help companies structure their export strategy; \n(iii) \nStrengthening the supply-side capabilities of exporting enterprises by promoting \ngreater adoption of digital technologies, encouraging sustainable manufacturing \npractices, and supporting the use of energy-efficient production methods; \n(iv) \nTax deduction on investments in AI technologies up to an amount of Rs150,000 \nfor Start-Ups and SMEs, and \n(v) \n50% waiver on the increase in electricity prices for industrial operators moving \ntowards 100% renewable energy. \nIt is important to highlight that export-oriented enterprises continue to face challenges \ndue to a shortage of skilled local labour, which affects their capacity to meet export delivery \ndeadlines. To address this, we are accelerating the recruitment of foreign labour and expertise \nthrough a streamlined, rule-based work permit system, which will be administered by the \nEconomic Development Board. \n“SYNTHETIC” DRUGS SEIZURE –RAIDED LOCAL LABORATORIES – \nTRACK DOWN MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/721",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 721,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/721) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to “synthetic” drugs, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner \nof Police, information as to the – \n(a) \nquantity thereof seized at the airports and seaports over the past five years; \n(b) \nlocal mini laboratories thereof identified and raided, and  \n(c) \nmeasures taken to track down consumers to suppliers thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \nPITON POLICE DIVISIONAL HEADQUARTERS – POLICE VEHICLES – \nOPERATIONALITY & ROADWORTHINESS \n\n131",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/722",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 722,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Certificate of Character, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, \ninformation as to whether consideration will be given for the \nclearance thereof for individuals having been found guilty of \nbreaches of the Quarantine Regulation Act 2020, namely, for not \nwearing masks or not wearing them on the mouth and nose? \n \n \n \n \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                          PAGE 6 of 18 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/723",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 723,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/723) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Piton Police \nDivisional Headquarters, he will, for the benefit of the House obtain from the Commissioner of \nPolice, information as to the number of police vehicles at the disposal thereof, indicating the \nroadworthiness thereof in each case.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that the Piton Police Divisional \nHeadquarters to which the hon. Member is referring is known as the Northern Divisional \nHeadquarters, located at La Paix, Piton. \nThe Northern Divisional Headquarters serves as the regional arm of the Mauritius Police \nForce, with a jurisdiction spanning approximately 326 square kilometres, encompassing parts of \nthe Districts of Pamplemousses and Rivière du Rempart, and with an estimated population of \n250,000. \nThe Division comprises 13 Police Stations, 1 Police Post and 14 specialized units. It also \nhosts a Detention Centre located at Royal Road, La Paix, Piton. \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Police that a total of 73 vehicles have been \nallocated to the Northern Division for use by its Stations and Units. These include cars, vans, \nmotorcycles, prisoner van/trucks, micro bus and mini buses. Out of these, 62 are currently \nroadworthy, while 11 vehicles are temporarily non-operational due to repairs, accidents, or \nmechanical breakdown. The details of each vehicle and their current status are being placed in \nthe Library of the National Assembly. \nNEW VEHICLE REGISTRATION – LONG QUEUES – REMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/724",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 724,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/724) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the new vehicles, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Registrar \nGeneral, information as to whether – \n(a) \nurgent remedial measures will be taken regarding the long queues of persons \nattending thereat for the registration thereof, and \n\n132 \n \n \n(b) \nconsideration will be given for arrangements to be made with the National Land \nTransport Authority (NLTA) for the transfer of ownership by the NLTA and the \nregistration of new vehicles with the Registrar General to be made at a unique \ncounter.",
      "answer": "Reply (The Minister of Land Transport): I am informed by the Registrar General’s \nDepartment that for the month of June this year, there was an exceptional upsurge in the number \nof transactions processed at its level given that 30 June 2025 was the deadline set for the taxation \non the previous regime for acquisition of a new or a second-hand imported vehicle.   \nI am further informed by the Registrar General’s Department that no significant queueing \nwas observed with regard to new vehicles and 94% of all transactions by new and second-hand \nimported motor vehicle dealers are done online.   \nAccording to the Registrar General’s Department, there was a virtual queue for the \nregistration of new vehicles, and same was addressed with the implementation of extra hours of \nwork by its officers. All the 8,319 transactions relating to new motor vehicles were registered \nwithin the statutory time limit, that is, by 30 June 2025. \nThe Registrar General’s Department has also confirmed that as from 01 July 2025, there is \nan influx of customers calling at its office at the Emmanuel Anquetil Building, Port Louis, for \nthe registration of second-hand motor vehicles from the local market since most of the potential \nbuyers have waited for the removal of registration duty on such transactions to be effective. \nHowever, I am apprised by the Registrar General’s Office that this outpouring in \ntransactions is temporary. Nevertheless, the following measures have been taken by the Registrar \nGeneral’s Department to mitigate inconveniences – \n(a) \nopening of counters as from 08:30 hours in the morning instead of 09:00 hours; \n(b) \nsetting up of dedicated counters for fleet dealers and frequent users;  \n(c) \nextension of the opening hours of counters, and \n(d) \ntemporary deployment of additional staff at the counters. \nConcurrently, the Registrar General’s Department has embarked on an aggressive \nsensitisation campaign to encourage the public to optimise the use of its existing online services \nrather than calling to the physical counters. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, as announced in the electoral manifesto, Government \nendeavours to decentralise the services of the NLTA to enhance proximity with its customers.  \n\n133 \n \n \nIn fact, my Ministry is going one step further with arrangements which are ongoing for the \nsetting up of a Vehicle Registration and Transfer Centre at Phoenix whereby both the NLTA and \nthe Registrar General’s Department will be housed under a single roof to provide a one-stop shop \nservice to the customers.  This new service is expected to be operational in the forthcoming \nmonths as announced in the Budget 2025-2026. Moreover, this facility would be replicated in \nother regions in due course. \nSODNAC WELLNESS PARK – OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT – PROPOSED \nREPLACEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/725",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 725,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/725) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Sodnac Wellness \nPark, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Employees Welfare Fund, information \nas to whether consideration will be given for the replacement of the outdoor equipment found \nthereat and, if so, give details thereof and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nUS DOLLAR LIQUIDITY – DEMAND & SUPPLY GAP – SHORTFALL \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/726",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 726,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/726) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to US Dollar liquidity on the domestic market, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to the average daily volumes of demand and supply thereof over the period 01 \nJune 2025 to date, indicating the measures taken to address any shortfall thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO – MAURITIUS-UK AGREEMENT – \nCHAGOSSIANS CITIZENSHIP RIGHTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/727",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 727,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/727) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime Minister, \nMinister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister \nfor Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the agreement between the Government of \n\n134 \n \n \nthe United Kingdom and of the Republic of Mauritius over the Chagos Archipelago, he will state \nthe recent development in relation thereto in the UK Parliament and the impact thereof on the \ncitizenship rights of the Chagossians, if any.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nKITE SURFING – LICENSING & SUPERVISION REQUIREMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/728",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 728,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/728) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to kite surfing, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the relevant authorities, information as to whether a person \nis required to hold a valid license in order to practice same on his/her own in our lagoons, further \nindicating if the presence of a coach or monitor is required onsite for those practicing same.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPOLICE OFFICERS – FOOT & BICYCLE PATROLS –EQUIPMENT \nUPGRADE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/729",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 729,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/729) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Police Officers assigned to foot and bicycle patrols, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the standard equipment \ncurrently issued thereto, indicating whether any upgrade thereof is currently being envisaged in \nline with international norms and, if so, further indicate the – \n(a) \nequipment being proposed; \n(b)   quantity being contemplated, and  \n(c)    expected timeline for implementation.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nAGOA RENEWAL – TARIFFS IMPOSITION – ECONOMIC IMPACTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/730",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 730,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/730) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the proposed \nconstruction/relocation of the Fire and Satellite Stations and the Head Offices of the Mauritius \nFire and Rescue Service (MFRS), he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the MFRS, in \neach case, information as to where matters stand, indicating the expected construction start and \ncompletion dates thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that several projects have been \nearmarked for the Mauritius Fire and Rescue Service (MFRS) with a view to enhancing our \nnational emergency response capacity.  \nThese include – \n• \nThe construction of a new headquarters and fire station at Quatre Bornes. \n\n35 \n \n \n• \nThe development of new fire stations at Goodlands, Montagne Blanche and Jin Fei. \n• \nThe establishment of eight satellite fire stations in various regions across the country. \nThese projects are being supervised by the Ministry of National Infrastructure, that is, the \nMNI.  \nMy Ministry is working in close collaboration with the MNI and is monitoring progress \nthrough a dedicated Project Steering Committee. Each project is currently at different stage of \nimplementation, which include – \n• \nland allocation; \n• \narchitectural and technical planning; \n• \ntender evaluation and award; \n• \nconstruction and site development. \nThe execution of these projects also entails multi-agency coordination, involving the \nCentral Procurement Board, other relevant Ministries and local authorities to ensure streamlined \nprocess and timely completion. \nGiven the scope of these infrastructural developments, I am tabling, for the consideration \nof the hon. Member, a comprehensive status report outlining the following key information for \neach fire station project start dates, expected completion timeline, and current progress of \nimplementation. \nThis report is being submitted for reference and provides all pertinent technical and \nadministrative details relevant to the planning and execution of the respective projects. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. \nMay I just inform the House that PQ B/737 will be replied by hon. Minister of Foreign \nAffairs, Regional Integration and International Trade. \nSo, we carry on. Hon. Second Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre d’Or, Mr Beejan! \n \n\n36 \n \n \nSICOM CEO – APPOINTMENT DATE, QUALIFICATIONS, EXPERIENCE & \nREMUNERATION PACKAGE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/731",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 731,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/731) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand'Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked the \nMinister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the current Chief \nExecutive Officer of the State Insurance Company of Mauritius Ltd., she will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain information as to the name thereof, indicating – \n(a) \nher terms and conditions of appointment and the date thereof;  \n(b) \nqualifications and experience held, and  \n(c) \nmonthly salary and allowances drawn, indicating if the salary was revised since her \nappointment and, if so, by how much and why.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ms Jeetun: Madam Speaker, I am informed that Mrs Nandita Ramdewar is the Group \nChief Executive Officer of the State Insurance Company of Mauritius Ltd (SICOM). \nIn regard to part (a) of the question, I am advised that Mrs Ramdewar joined SICOM on 04 \nMay 1992 as Manager, Finance on a permanent and pensionable basis. She has since held \nvarious positions within the company. She was appointed Group CEO on 05 May 2021. She is \nalso a Director of the SICOM Board since 20 September 2013. \nWith respect to part (b) of the question, I am informed that Mrs Ramdewar is a Fellow of \nthe Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (FCCA) and holds an MBA from the \nUniversity of Manchester. \nWith regard to her experience, she worked at De Chazal du Mée & Co. prior to joining \nSICOM in May 1992. She has occupied the following positions at SICOM prior to being \nappointed Group CEO – \n• \nSenior Manager on 01 January 2002; \n• \nGroup Senior Manager, Corporate on 01 July 2010; \n• \nChief Finance Officer on 01 July 2013; \n• \nDeputy Group CEO on 15 February 2018, and  \n• \nOfficer-in-Charge on 02 September 2019. \n\n37 \n \n \nMadam Speaker, regarding part (c) of the question, I am informed that as at 30 June 2024, \nher annual remuneration, including salaries, other allowances and performance bonus amounted \nto Rs11,506,022. In addition, the company contributes pension related benefits amounting to \nRs3,206,354, thus making a total remuneration package of Rs14,712,375. This information is as \npublished in the company’s financial statement. \nI am informed that her current monthly pay package is Rs762,242, which does not include \nperformance bonus, car benefit, passage benefit and pension related benefits. \nFollowing her appointment as Group CEO in May 2021, there were three salary \nadjustments of 3.5%, respectively, namely two increments and one salary review for the last five \nyears.  \nTaking into consideration her total renumeration, which includes salaries, allowances, \nbonus, refund of leave, pension related contribution and other benefits, it is observed that there \nhas been an increase of 37.5% from 2020 to 2024. \nI am also advised that salary adjustments are determined by an independent Salary \nCommissioner according to SICOM’s internal policies and these adjustments are considered and \napproved by the Board. \nMadam Speaker, my Ministry will ensure that it monitors corporate governance and \nexecutive remuneration matters across institutions under its purview in line with public \nexpectation and best practice framework although we must bear in mind that this is a company \nunder the Companies Act which has a Board which is responsible for the governance matters. \nThank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister! One question, yes! \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Minister inform whether the \nincrease of the actual remuneration package of the concerned person was approved by the Board, \nand if yes, when and under what policy framework, as she is only a FCCA compared to the \nprevious CEO who is a qualified actuary? \nDr. Ms Jeetun: Madam Speaker, I can confirm that every salary increase and payment has \nbeen approved by the Board. I can confirm that but I understand that there are some concerns, \nprobably, that a public sector organisation executive pay is perceived as being high, especially \n\n38 \n \n \nfor a company of which the assets and the management of that company, 62% of it, comes from \ngovernment. So, it’s a very captive market share, it’s not like any other commercial enterprise. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nAlright, the hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nDOMICILIARY VISITS – ELDERLY & BEDRIDDEN PERSONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/732",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 732,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/732) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked the \nMinister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity whether, in regard to \ndomiciliary visits to the elderly and bedridden persons, he will state the number of – \n(a)  persons concerned therewith in each case;  \n(b)  doctors involved at the Medical Unit, indicating the frequency of the visits, and  \n(c)  discontinued visits since January 2025 to date, indicating the reasons therefor.",
      "answer": "Mr Subron: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that all elderly persons of 90 \nyears old and above are eligible for domiciliary visits by virtue of age. Secondly, all persons aged \n0 to 89 years, who need constant care and attention of another person, including bedridden \npersons who are in receipt of a carer’s allowance, are also eligible to domiciliary visits.  \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that as at July 2025, 4,836 persons \naged 90 years and above are eligible for domiciliary visits, effected by medical practitioners of \nmy Ministry. Secondly, 24,745 persons who are aged 0 to 89 years and also beneficiaries of \ncarer’s allowance, are eligible for the domiciliary visits, effected by medical practitioners of my \nMinistry. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that as at date, there are 352 medical \npractitioners, working on a sessional basis contract at the Medical Unit of my Ministry who carry \nout monthly domiciliary visits to eligible beneficiaries.  \nWith regard to part (c) of the question, I am informed that since January 2025 to date, \ndomiciliary visits have been discontinued for 1,906 persons as a result of death and for 179 \npersons aged 0 to 89 years, for non-renewal of their carer’s allowance.  \n\n39 \n \n \nMadam Speaker, for the benefit of the House, let me also add that compared to December \n2024 where there were 29,024 domiciliary visits, in July 2025, there are now 29,581 \nbeneficiaries of domiciliary visits, that is, 557 more beneficiaries. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente, l’honorable ministre dans sa réponse a fait état du fait \nque ce n’est qu’à partir de 90 ans, si j’ai bien compris que les personnes… \nMadam Speaker: Il a mentionné ceux de 0 à 89 aussi. Moi, j’ai bien écouté. Il a \nmentionné ceux de 90 ans et ceux… \nMr Subron: There are two categories! \nMadam Speaker: Voilà! Dans la fourchette 0 à 89! \nMr Quirin: Oui, j’ai bien compris. \nMadam Speaker: Qui sont bedridden et qui en ont besoin.  \nMr Quirin: Voilà ! Donc, je porte à l’attention du ministre. Il y a un cas dans notre \ncirconscription, une dame de Chebel, Madame M. G. J. atteinte d’Alzheimer et dont la visite \nmédicale et la carer’s allowance ont été supprimées sans raison valable. Elle a bénéficié… \nMadam Speaker: Non, là c’est difficile pour le ministre de vous répondre sur un cas \nprécis. \nMr Quirin: Non, c’est par rapport à plusieurs cas et plusieurs personnes qui sont dans ce \nmême cas. Mais là, je cite un exemple particulier pour lui dire quelles sont les dispositions qui \nsont prises ? Je peux comprendre qu’il y a des reformes en cours, qui sont très valable mais dans \nl’immédiat afin de justement venir en aide à ces personnes, quelles sont les solutions immédiates \nqui pourraient être prises afin que ces personnes puissent continuer à vivre comme il faut sans \ntrop de difficulté, je dirais ? \nMr Subron: I thank the hon. Member. I can inquire on the particular case if you give me \nthe names and the details. As for the measures, as indicated in the last paragraph of my answer, \nmeasures have already been taken, this is why we have 557 more beneficiaries of domiciliary \nvisits and we will continue in this trend. \n\n40 \n \n \nMadam Speaker: Dr. Aumeer, first! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister, whether he can see \nwith the Medical Appeal Board of his Ministry that they make necessary arrangements for those \npeople who are going on the appeal board and who cannot ambulatory make it there and are \nbedridden due to medical disease or else, are denied having an appeal fairly since I am not going \nto mention a particular case that has been denied only last week? Please look into that. \nMr Subron: I think this is a very important question. Measures have been taken. As it \nstands now, the appropriate measures are taken for the bedridden above 90. Measures are also \nbeing taken for, I have just learned, persons above 80 but we can also extend the measures for all \npeople who can’t attend the Medical Board and we will seek resources for it. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: You should do like in court. You can do online, zoom, if they can, at \ntheir age, I don’t know.  \nYes, hon. Edouard! \nMr Edouard: Merci, Madame la présidente, est-ce que le ministre peut nous dire s’il y a \nun mécanisme de suivi pour s’assurer que ces personnes reçoivent effectivement la visite du \nmédecin ? Parce que parfois même si c’est recommandé, elles ne voient jamais de médecin à \ndomicile. Merci. \nMr Subron: I have already given the list and the visits. But I can assure the hon. Member \nwhenever there is a case reported to me of doctors not attending the visits, measures are taken \nand we look very strictly on this issue because all these people are our elderly. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! Okay, on the elderly. \nNow, I have the hon. Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE, Dr. Saumtally! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 10 – ERNEST FLORENT, OLIVIA & BRAMSTHAN – \nFOOTBALL PLAYGROUNDS & COMMUNITY CENTRES – UPGRADING & \nMAINTENANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/733",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 733,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Dr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/733) Dr. R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the provisions for community \ninfrastructure and village amenities announced in the Budget Speech 2025-2026, he will state if \n\n41 \n \n \nconsideration will be given to prioritise the upgrading and maintaining of football playgrounds \nand community centres in Ernest Florent, Olivia and Bramsthan, in Constituency No. 10 to keep \nthese spaces safe and usable for families and young people.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I will reply to PQ B/733 and B/742 \ntogether as they pertain to the same subject matter. \nThe purpose of the small community project is to upgrade and maintain infrastructure \nfalling under the jurisdiction of the Local Authorities.  \nAs I mentioned to the House in my reply PQ B/677, on 15 July 2025, the football ground at \nErnest Florent has been cleared. Six out of the twelve floodlights are no functionable thereat. The \nDistrict Council of Flacq has informed that works are being undertaken by in-house labour and \nare expected to be completed by 07 August 2025. The ground wiring is being replaced by \noverhead wiring. There are currently no toilet facilities thereat.  \nI have been advised that the Council is presently carrying out a survey as regard \nconstruction of public toilets in 23 regions under its jurisdiction. It is expected that the estimated \ncost would revolve around Rs46 million for the construction thereof under a design and build \nmodel.   \nAs regards Olivia Football Ground, I am informed that it is in a good state except for the \nlighting system. The floodlights are currently being replaced. This replacement could not be \nundertaken earlier in view of lack of fund. Toilet facilities are available at the village hall which \nis adjacent to the football ground. A proposal for the construction of a covered gradin including \nfencing and installation of profilage has been submitted for consultation to my Ministry at an \nestimated cost of Rs10 million. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to the Bramsthan Football Ground, the House may wish to \nnote that the Council is currently undertaking the construction of a cloakroom with toilet \nfacilities under the India Grant Assistance to a tune of Rs1.9 million. The project has already \nstarted and will be completed by 31 August 2025.  \nI am also informed that the Council intends to construct covered shelters thereat for an \namount of Rs50 million upon the availability of funds. Repair works are currently ongoing for \nthe football ground regarding the lighting system. The works will be completed by this week.  \n\n42 \n \n \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nYes, the hon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle. \nSANDALWOOD SPECIES – HARVESTING AND TRADE – CONSERVATION \nPROGRAMMES – LEGAL ENFORCEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/734",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 734,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/734) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the protected sandalwood species, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to – \n(a) \nhow the harvesting and trade thereof, including on private land, are regulated, \nindicating the number of licences issued therefor over the past five years and the \nterms and conditions thereof, and  \n(b) \nwhether –  \n(i) \nany reforestation, monitoring or conservation programmes are being \nimplemented to ensure sustainable growth thereof, and  \n(ii) \n a toughening of the legal or enforcement measures to address illegal \nharvesting and/or export thereof is being considered.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, hon. Member.  \nMadam Speaker, since 2021, sandalwood is listed as a protected plant in the Forests and \nReserves Act. As such, the Forestry Service and the National Plant Protection Office regulates \nthe exploitation and export of sandalwood. I wish to inform the House that sandalwood tree is \namong the most expensive woods and commands high prices because of its cosmetic and \ntherapeutic value, mainly for its essential oil. And, there is a huge international demand for \nsandalwood for this fragrant heartwood, its most valuable part, priced at over 400 USD per kg.  \nAs regards part (a) of the question, I wish to highlight that there are no licences that are \nissued in regard to the exploitation and trade of any protected plant. However, dealers of \nsandalwood are required to register with the Forestry Service to be able to conduct any activity \n\n43 \n \n \nrelated to exploitation or trade and contraveners are liable to penalties established under the \nForests and Reserves Act.  \nDuring the past five years, 23 companies have been registered as sandalwood dealers by \nthe Forestry Service. And as at date, only 11 of them are still active.  \nMadam Speaker, just for the years 2023 and 2024, my Ministry, through the National Plant \nProtection Office, has issued 75 and 69 phytosanitary certificates for the exportation of 689 \ntonnes and 117 tonnes of sandalwood, respectively for export to different countries, namely; \nUnited Arab Emirates, India and China.  \nThese figures indicate that there is an overexploitation of sandalwood in Mauritius and this \noverexploitation is causing widespread destruction of sandalwood trees on both state and private \nproperties. To address this issue, regulations were made in October 2024 to prevent the cutting \nand felling of sandalwood without the authorisation of the Conservator of Forests.  Nonetheless, \nfrom January 2025 to date, phytosanitary certificates had been issued for the exportation of 98 \ntonnes of sandalwood.  \nMadam Speaker, with a view to addressing the issue of theft of sandalwood in state lands \nand the continuous exploitation of the plant, the legislative framework was further strengthened \nin May 2025 whereby its cutting, felling, exploitation and export were banned for a period of 10 \nyears to allow the species to regenerate as sandalwood is a relatively slow-grower. Any person \ncaught contravening these regulations will inter alia be liable to pay five times the value of the \nforest-produce in addition to any penalty imposed by Court of law. \nMadam Speaker, with regard part (b)(i) of the question, the Forestry Service, for its part, is \nworking on a programme for the reforestation of sandalwood species within the island. \nMoreover, technical advice is being dispensed to those willing to engage in sandalwood \nplantation. \nAs for part (b)(ii), in order to enforce the regulations banning the exploitation and trade of \nsandalwood, regular patrols within state lands and reserves are being carried out by the Forestry \nService. The assistance of the Special Mobile Force and police force is sought as and when \nrequired. Interventions are also carried out on private-owned lands within the island to combat \nthe illegal harvesting of sandalwood.  \n\n44 \n \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. \nYes, First Member for Rodrigues, Ms Collet.  \nBUDGET SPEECH 2025-2026 – JUSTICE SYSTEM DIGITALISATION – PROJECT \nSTATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/735",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 735,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/735) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Attorney-General \nwhether, in regard to the digitalisation of the justice system as announced in the Budget Speech \n2025-2026, he will state if funds have been specifically allocated for the acquisition and \nimplementation of real-time transcription software or digital court reporting systems and, if so, \nindicate the – \n (a) timeline envisaged for the deployment thereof; \n(b)  expected outcome thereof in terms of improved efficiency of court proceedings and \ncase backlog reduction, and  \n(c) \ntraining and capacity-building of judicial and court officers for optimum output.",
      "answer": "Mr Glover: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Master and Registrar of the Supreme \nCourt that a budget of Rs2 million has been allocated for the procurement of transcription \nsoftware that will enable the real-time transcription of audio-recordings of Court proceedings in \nEnglish, French and Kreol. \nThe hon. Member will be pleased to note that an additional sum of Rs2 million has also \nbeen allocated for the implementation of a bundle project for Rodrigues which will combine a \ndigital Court recording system with a video-conferencing facility. \nAs regard the timeline, the deployment of the transcription software is expected to begin in \nFebruary 2026 and be completed by August 2026. The project for the Rodrigues Court is \nscheduled to start in January 2026 and is expected to be completed by June 2026.  \nAs regards part (b) of this question, we are indeed implementing these changes to improve \nthe efficiency of the judicial system. At present, obtaining transcripts of proceedings can take \nseveral months and their unavailability often leads to the postponement of cases and judgments.  \nSince the new transcription system will be automated and produce output in real-time, we \ncan reasonably expect significant time-savings.  \n\n45 \n \n \nRegarding the backlog of cases, Madam Speaker, we anticipate that existing recordings \nwill also be fed into the system which will help to expedite matters. However, the issue of \nbacklog is multidimensional and must also be addressed through improved staffing and better \norganisational solutions for our Courts, areas which this government is fully committed to tackle. \nThis brings me, Madam Speaker, to part (c) of the question, the practical implementation \nof these reforms will be crucial as the system must operate efficiently with appropriate hardware, \nregular maintenance and staff who are properly trained to use it.  \nIn this regard, I am informed by the Master and Registrar, that training programmes will be \ndelivered to all relevant officers in due course to ensure the optimal use of the new systems.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Attorney General. Happy? \nMs Collet: Yes.  \nMadam Speaker:  The Fourth Member for Rodrigues, Mr Edouard.  \nSTATE TRADING CORPORATION – ANIMAL FEED IMPORTATION – \nRODRIGUES BREEDERS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/736",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 736,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/736) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nCommerce and Consumer  \nProtection whether, in regard to animal feed, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the State Trading Corporation, information as to whether it will \nconsider importing same for distribution to suppliers for the benefit of Rodrigues breeders in \nview of the chronic shortages thereof in Rodrigues and lack of storage facilities of the local \nsuppliers thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Yeung Sik Yuen: Madam Speaker, let me at the outset, emphasise that my Ministry \nremains fully committed to supporting Rodrigues in its efforts to strengthen food security and \nimprove the sustainability of its livestock sector.  \nI recently engaged in constructive discussions with Commissioner Mr Louis Ange Perrine, \nthe Commissioner of Agriculture in the Rodrigues Regional Assembly, to explore collaborative \nways of facilitating this matter. \nMadam Speaker, we are aware that Rodrigues did face challenges in the supply of animal \nfeed, particularly during the period December 2024 to January 2025. I am informed that these \n\n46 \n \n \ndifficulties were largely due to a combination of factors, including supply disruption from a key \nmainland producer, limited storage capacity on the island, gaps in demands, planning for peak \nperiods, and end of year shipping delays. \nI am further informed that the situation has now improved. Since March this year, the \nsupply of animal feed has stabilised with even a surplus reported in June 2025. Nevertheless, my \nMinistry recognises the need for a more structured and resilient supply framework going \nforward.  \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that there are presently 142 different types of \nanimal feed available on the Rodrigues market, catering to various animal species.  \nWith your permission, Madam Speaker, I will table the list of these 142 types of animal \nfeed.  \nThis diversity, while reflecting other needs of local livestock, presents certain logistical \nchallenges in terms of importation and storage which would require a more coordinated and \nstreamlined approach. \nIn this context, my Ministry, in collaboration with the Rodrigues Regional Assembly, will \nexplore all possibilities. Through this collaborative approach, we aim to promote better planning \nand strengthen market linkages in a manner that would ultimately benefit Rodrigues breeders and \nwhich will ensure both continuity of supply and price stability in the livestock sector in \nRodrigues. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes, hon. Edouard! \nMr Edouard: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Will the hon. Minister please consider to have \na bigger warehouse in Rodrigues? \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Madam Speaker, we will have to work on it. If funds are available, \nwe will consider. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. François! \nMr François: Madam Speaker, being given that the import of the 142-animal feed \nfluctuates and it depends on the shelf life and the quantity of live animals also in Rodrigues, will \n\n47 \n \n \nthe hon. Minister be agreeable to ensure that his Ministry and the Ministry of Shipping guarantee \nenough containers whenever required by local importers to avoid any shortage thereat? \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: We will work with the Ministry of Shipping. \nMadam Speaker: Very good. Thank you. \nMr François: Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Time is moving.  \nThe First Member Port-Louis Maritime and Port Louis East, hon. Juman! \nROCHE BOIS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE – PROJECT STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/737",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 737,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives",
      "question": "(No. B/737) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives whether, in regard to the ongoing negotiations with \nthe United States of America concerning the imposition of trade tariffs on Mauritius and as to the \nrenewal of the African Growth and Opportunity Act, he will state where matters stand in terms \nof – \n\n135 \n \n \n(a) \nwhether as from 01 August 2025, new and higher trade tariffs will be imposed on \nMauritian imports to USA, and \n(b) \nreports and studies available as to any estimated economic impact on our key \nexport sectors such as textiles, seafood and outsourcing services.",
      "answer": "Reply (The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration & International Trade): \nAt the outset, let me emphasise that Mauritius has left no stone unturned to safeguard our \ninterests regarding both the imposition of trade tariffs announced by the United States (US) and \nthe renewal of African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) preferences. The US is the 4th \nlargest buyer of Mauritian products and our exports to the United States represent some 10% of \ntotal exports. \nAs the House is aware, the AGOA trade preferences have been signed into law in the \nUnited States, in the year 2000 and subsequently renewed on numerous occasions, and most \nrecently in 2015, for a period of 10 years. As matters stand, AGOA is set to expire on 30 \nSeptember 2025. \nWell before the expiry of AGOA preferences, my Ministry had already been engaged in a \nlobbying exercise alongside other AGOA eligible Sub-Saharan countries for an expeditious \nextension of AGOA preferences so as to ensure trade continuity post 30 September 2025. \nAt last, the AGOA Forum was held in July 2024 in Washington D.C. AGOA Ministers \ncalled for a 16-year extension of AGOA and for the current graduation clause to be addressed \nside by side. Buyers require predictability and orders are normally placed 9 months in advance.  \nMauritius also joined forces with other AGOA eligible countries with a view to sensitising \nUS lawmakers on the urgency of renewing AGOA as well as maintaining the third country fabric \nprovision and addressing the graduation clause. \nUnder the leadership of Mauritius, a letter was sent by the Dean of the African Diplomatic \nCorps in Washington D.C to the Chairman of the US House of Representatives Ways and Means \nCommittee in November 2024, urging for the expeditious renewal of AGOA. \nIn March 2025, I addressed a letter to Ambassador Greer following his appointment as \nUnited States Trade Representative (USTR) and sought the support of the United States for a \nlong-term renewal of AGOA to ensure business certainty and predictability.  \nAs the House is aware, the situation had become very volatile since 02 April 2025 when \nthe United States unilaterally announced reciprocal tariffs on most of the products entering the \n\n136 \n \n \ncountry. As far as Mauritius is concerned, a reciprocal tariff rate of 40% was announced. The \nreciprocal tariff of 40% nullifies AGOA preferences as it is applicable to AGOA beneficiaries as \nwell. However, the US President announced on 09 April 2025 that the reciprocal tariff rate was \nlowered to 10% and would be in place for 90 days. \nSince then, as had been previously emphasised by the Hon. Prime Minister in the House on \n8 April 2025, Mauritius had engaged in national consultations with a view to charting the way \nforward and mitigating the impact on our economy. \nMy colleague, hon. Ameer Meea and myself have met with private sector representatives \non numerous occasions to take stock of the situation and chart a way forward. Taking into \naccount these national consultations, I would like to inform the House that the following course \nof action has been undertaken by Government – \n(a) \nA letter from the hon. Prime Minister, Dr Navin Ramgoolam was addressed to \nPresident Trump on 10 April 2025 proposing a partnership with the United States to \ndeepen cooperation in economic and regional security matters; \n(b) \nA joint letter signed by myself and hon. Ameer Meea was sent to the USTR on 23 \nApril 2025, proposing a Bilateral Agreement between the United States and \nMauritius; \n(c) \nSubsequent to these letters, the United States and Mauritius signed a confidentiality \nagreement on upcoming negotiations on 30 April 2025; \n(d) \nA joint letter from the Deputy Prime Minister, hon. Mr P. Bérenger and hon. \nMinister Ameer Meea was sent to the USTR on 27 May 2025, expressing our \nreadiness to initiate discussions with the US, aimed at deepening our ties, \naddressing trade imbalances and charting out a new economic partnership; \n(e) \nOn 04 June 2025, President Trump replied to the hon. Prime Minister’s letter and \ninformed that the Office of the USTR has been delegated to engage with Mauritius \nas soon as possible. President Trump stated that both parties can negotiate a deal \nthat not only addresses the trade imbalances but also enhances the partnership \nbetween our nations; \n(f) \nIn a letter dated 02 June 2025, the USTR requested that Mauritius submit its best \noffer for consideration by the US authorities; \n\n137 \n \n \n(g) \nIn a letter dated 04 June 2025 sent by my Ministry, Mauritius emphasized that most \nproducts exported by the US to Mauritius have no duties and that we are \nconsidering to source more products from U.S into Mauritius. In return, Mauritius \nrequested the retention of current duty-free preferences under AGOA for key \nexports.  \nLet me also inform the House that my colleague, hon. Minister Ameer Meea, met the \nAssistant USTR for Africa, Mrs C. Hamilton on 25 June 2025 in the sidelines of the US Africa \nBusiness Summit in Luanda, Angola. Hon. Minister Ameer Meea reiterated the request of \nMauritius for a mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement which would address our concerns \nover tariff related unpredictability affecting business confidence and impacting future orders. In \nthis respect, hon. Minister Ameer Meea requested for the maintenance of AGOA like preferences \npending a bilateral trade agreement between Mauritius and the US.  \nIn all our interactions with the US, Mauritius has emphasized the important role in the \nregional supply and value chains especially in the textiles and apparel sector. As an example, \nMauritius sources raw materials from Zambia which are spun into yarn and thereafter \ntransformed into fabrics and garments for exports to the United States. \nOn 07 July 2025, President Trump announced a further postponement of the deadline to 01 \nAugust 2025 alongside revised rates for several countries. The rate for Mauritius is yet to be \nannounced. However, we have been informed that the proposals from Mauritius are being duly \nconsidered by the United States Administration. A response is being awaited.  \nOn 21 July 2025, the hon. Prime Minister wrote a letter to President Trump expressing his \nthanks to the US President for mandating the staff of the USTR to engage in a dialogue with the \nofficers of my Ministry and reiterating our proposal to engage in discussions for a bilateral \npartnership. The hon. Prime Minister has also offered to host the US-Africa Business Summit \njointly with the Corporate Council on Africa in June 2026. This Summit will further enhance \nbusiness relations between Africa, Mauritius and the United States. \nWith respect to part (b) of the question, allow me to mention that live animals, apparel, \ncane sugar, jewellery, fish are among the top export product categories to the US to the value of \nRs6.8 billion. At present, textile and apparel, amounting to approximately Rs1.6 billion, is \namong the largest export sector benefitting from AGOA preferences. \n\n138 \n \n \nAs far as exports regarding the seafood sector, which do not fall under AGOA exports to \nthe US might lose its competitiveness vis a vis exports from Asian or Nordic countries \ndepending on the tariffs applicable and considering freight costs. \nThe non-renewal of AGOA will eliminate our preferential access compared with large \nexporters from South East Asia. In case of non-renewal of AGOA after 30 September 2025, our \nproducts will attract Customs Duties from 12% to 32% in the United States. Any reciprocal \ntariffs imposed by the US will be in addition to the existing general tariffs.  \nAs we approach the final months of AGOA, it may be noted that there has been a decline \nin export revenues. Exports between January to March 2024 amounted to Rs1.7 billion compared \nto Rs1.2 billion for January to March 2025. In comparison to quarter of 2024, exports to the \nUnited States decreased by 11.3%. \nLE MORNE PUBLIC BEACH – RENOVATION WORKS – STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/738",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 738,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/738) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port-Louis Maritime & Port Louis East) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the construction of the Roche-\nBois Community Health Centre, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nwhere matters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I am informed that a plot of land of an extent of \napproximately 2,600 m2 at Roche Bois has been vested in my Ministry in June 2018 for the \nconstruction of Roche Bois Community Health Centre. The specifications, tender drawings, bills \nof quantities and cost estimates were prepared by Hospital Services Consultancy Corporation \nLimited in December 2019. \nAfter the first bidding exercise carried out in July 2019, the contract was awarded to AWL \nTrading and Contracting Co. Ltd. for the sum Rs39,069,182.50. However, as the latter did not \nsubmit a performance security, as laid down in the conditions of contract, within the specified \ntimeframe, the award was cancelled in February 2020. \nSubsequently, a second bidding exercise was undertaken in August 2020. The contract was \nawarded to Ganessen Construction Ltd. in February 2021 for an amount of Rs36,237,936. The \ncontract was signed on 28 May 2021 and the duration of work was 300 calendar days as from \nhanding over the site. However, due to illegal squatters, the site could only be handed over to the \ncontractor on 24 August 2021. \n\n48 \n \n \nThe start and completion dates were set for 07 September 2021 and 04 July 2022, \nrespectively. Since the start, the progress of work of the contractor was very slow and several \nwarnings were issued to him.  \nAs no improvement in the progress was noted, and on the advice of the consultant, the \ncontract was eventually terminated on 22 May 2023 in line with the conditions of the contract.  \nThe performance guarantee of an amount of approximately Rs3.7 million was forfeited. \nThe total percentage of work completed was approximately 8% for which an amount of \nRs2,746,415 had been paid to the contractor.  \nSubsequently, the consultant of the project was requested to assess the remaining works \nand prepare the cost estimates. The consultant initially submitted a cost estimate of Rs50.5 \nmillion. However, some essential components such as boundary wall, gates, lift provisions and \ncontingencies were omitted. My Ministry, therefore, requested the consultant to review the scope \nof work and the cost estimates. \nIn March 2024, the consultant submitted an amended scope of works and cost estimates \namounting to Rs77 million. However, the Ministry of Finance requested my Ministry to review \nthe requirements with a view to bringing down the cost of the project. \nMadam Speaker, the consultant is at present in the process of reviewing the concept design \nbefore proceeding with detailed design and drawing. My Ministry has approached the Ministry \nof National Infrastructure to advise on the way forward. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nYes, hon. Juman! \nMr Juman: Hon. Minister, thank you. By when can we expect the works to start? By when \ncan we expect, through the consultant, constructers, etc., the works to start on site? \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, having a long experience in infrastructure works, I \npersonally believe that this has to be scrapped. We have to hand over the entire work to the \nexperts at the Ministry of Infrastructure because they have to look into the issue over again, as \nthe sum they are demanding is too exaggerating.  \n\n49 \n \n \nIt is impossible for us to spend that much of money. That is the reason why I personally \nbelieve that we have to handover the matter to the Ministry of Public Infrastructure. \nMadam Speaker: So, you cannot give a timeframe? \nMr Bachoo: No. \nMr Juman: May I request the hon. Minister to clear the bushy land there? The site is \nbushy. Can you clear that? \nMadam Speaker: Bushy, bushy! \nMr Bachoo: I will look into the issue. We will try to have the site cleared. But, personally, \nagain, I believe that it is too exaggerated. The consultants are exaggerating. I am clear on that.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay. I do not know if we can do the next question within three \nminutes. We can try. Let us try! \nHon. Second Member for Savanne and Black River! \nCHEMIN GRENIER – NEW MARKET FAIR – SOLAR PANEL INSTALLATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/739",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 739,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/739) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the new market fair in the Village of Chemin \nGrenier, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Savanne District Council, \ninformation as to if consideration will be given for the installation of solar panels thereat. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister of Local Government!",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the District Council of Savanne that the \nproject titled ‘Construction of New Market fair at Chemin Grenier’ was initiated in October 2021 \nwith a contract value of Rs125 million, inclusive of VAT. \nThe project, which includes a double-storey office building, mechanical and electrical \nworks, external site and drainage works, is currently 98% complete. The only remaining work \nconcerns the asphalting along the storm water drain at the periphery of the site. These works are \nscheduled to be finalised by September 2025. Upon completion, the Council’s consultant will \nprepare the final accounts.  \n\n50 \n \n \nAs regards the proposal of installing solar Photovoltaic (PV) panel at the new market fair, I \nam informed that this initiative was put forward by the hon. Member in February 2022 during his \ntenure as District Councillor. The proposal was referred to the Mechanical and Electrical (M&E) \nConsultant for a feasibility study. The consultant confirmed that it was technically feasible to \ninstall a 5KW system comprising 17 PV panels on the roof at an estimated cost of Rs525,000. \nThis was supported by a preliminary quote of Rs300,000, exclusive of VAT from KYA \nEngineers Ltd., subject to further technical input from metrological service.  \nThe Council, during its sitting of 27 July 2022, agreed that the PV panel installation would \nbe considered for implementation upon project completion and subject to availability of savings \nor contingency funds. \nMadam Speaker, my Ministry has since consulted the Ministry of Energy and Public \nUtilities regarding possible support scheme for the installation of PV system. Based on advice \nreceived, the District Council of Savanne has been recommended to apply under these two key \nschemes managed by the Central Electricity Board (CEB). \nPublic Sector Entities (PSE) Scheme, that is, own investment, this scheme allows Public \nSector entities to invest in PV system up to 2 MW with CEB purchasing the generated electricity \nat Rs4.20 per KW. The energy bill of the entity is credited accordingly. The capacity is capped at \n150% of the entity’s annual energy consumption. \nSecondly, CEB Public Building Solar Project, that is, free installation. Under this Scheme, \nMadam Speaker, CEB installed a free PV system up to 50 KW funded 27% by the Green \nClimate Fund and 73% by the Minister of Finance refundable over 20 years. The installation cost \nis recovered via direction from PSE monthly electricity bill. The tender for this Scheme has \nalready been floated with a closing date set for 20 August 2025. \nI am further informed that the District Council of Savanne has already submitted four \napplications under the CEB Public Building Solar Project for PV installation at the Council Head \nOffice and three village halls. \nThe Council may now consider applying under either of these two schemes for the Chemin \nGrenier market fair once the construction is completed and the defect liability period expires \naround September 2025.  \n\n51 \n \n \nMadam Speaker, the inclusion of solar photovoltaic system aligns with national \nsustainability goals and would contribute to reducing the electricity cost for the Council. The \nimplementation, however, will depend on the availability of funds or successful applications \nunder the aforementioned schemes.  \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker:  Thank you, hon. Minister! I suspend the Sitting for one and a half \nhours. \nAt 1.02 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.31 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated. Parliamentary Questions! The hon. First Member for \nPiton & Rivière du Rempart, Dr. Prayag! \nNATIONAL TRANSPORT CORPORATION – BUS DEPOT – PARKED BUSES – \nROADWORTHINESS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/740",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 740,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/740) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to its bus depot at Rivière du Rempart, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the National Transport Corporation, information as to the \nnumber of buses parked thereat, indicating in each case, the roadworthiness thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the National Transport \nCorporation that 69 buses of various makes and models are parked at Rivière du Rempart depot \nout of which 66 buses are operational. The three remaining buses are to be scrapped as two of \nthem registered in 2004 have reached their 21 years road life while one registered in 2007 is \nbeyond economic repair. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that the buses from Rivière du Rempart depot \noperate along 13 routes covering a daily average of 13,100 km. Safety and security of passengers \nremain a priority of the NTC and an average of 20 buses are grounded daily for repairs and \nservicing at the same depot. \n\n52 \n \n \nI wish to also apprise the House that only buses that are roadworthy and have valid \ncertificates of fitness are allowed by the NTC to operate. For the sake of time, Madam Speaker, I \nam tabling the information relating to the roadworthiness and certificate of fitness of the buses. \nMadam Speaker, I have to inform the House that operational and HR issues at Rivière du \nRempart have been brought to my attention several times – by my colleague as well. I have \nrequested the NTC to probe into the matter at the earliest. Now that we have a new general \nmanager, one week into, Dr. Harvin Soonarane who knows the domain well as he is a \nmechanical engineer.  \nMadam Speaker:  Thank you, hon. Minister! Is that all right? Yes, hon. Fourth Member \nfor Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nPUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS – BOARDS – COMPOSITION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/741",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 741,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research",
      "question": "(No. B/741) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research whether, in regard to \nthe public higher education institutions falling under his purview, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain therefrom, information as to whether the Boards thereof have been constituted \nand, if so, give the composition thereof in each case.",
      "answer": "Dr. Sukon: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Member for this question. I wish to inform \nthis House that the comprehensive process of constituting the boards of our public higher \neducation institutions has been formally initiated and has progressed to a considerable advanced \nstage. I am informed that the completion of this critical government framework is imminent and \nshall be finalised within the immediate term.  \nMadam Speaker, during this interim period and in order to safeguard the uninterrupted \noperational efficacy and governance of these institutions of paramount importance to our \neducational landscape, the Permanent Secretary of my Ministry has graciously undertaken to \nserve in the capacity of acting Chairperson for the University of Technology Mauritius, Open \nUniversity of Mauritius while also providing administrative guidance and facilitation to all the \nother HEIs, to ensure absolute continuity and strategic oversight in the operation of these \ninstitutions thereby precluding most major disruptions to the essential functions and progressive \ndevelopment of these establishments. \n\n53 \n \n \nMoreover, in the aftermath of the last general elections, I have established a calendar of \nregular management consultations with the heads of our Higher Education Institutions. These \nsystematic managements meetings, which I chair personally, are conducted to ensure optimal \ncoordination among all stakeholders to address expeditiously any operational considerations that \nmay arise and to maintain the most exacting standards of international excellence throughout this \ntransitional phase. \nMadam Speaker, I wish most emphatically to assure this House that the formal \nestablishment of these boards remains an absolute priority within my Ministry’s agenda and, I \nundertake to keep this House fully apprised of all substantive development as they unfold. \nMadam Speaker:  Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes! \nMr A. Duval: I have two supplementary questions. Firstly, Madam Speaker, as the \nMinister is aware, he cannot, neither him nor the Permanent Secretary… \nMadam Speaker: Question!  \nMr A. Duval: It is a question! … substitute themselves to the Councils, to the statutory \nlegislations which regulate the University of Mauritius, the University Technology of Mauritius, \nthe Open University and l'Université des Mascareignes. Therefore, can the hon. Minister state, \nwith regard to the decisions taken by all these institutions to date since eight-months, whether it \nis in terms of recruitment and other administrative functions, have these decisions today been \novertaken by him or his Permanent Secretary or have they been left on autopilot? \nDr. Sukon: I can assure the hon. Member that there has been no recruitment on permanent \nbasis during this month. \nMr A. Duval: My second question. That is precisely my point, Madam Speaker, in fact \nthere is, for example, at University of Mauritius for the medical department, there is the lack of \ntrained doctors who come to… \nMadam Speaker:  Question please! \nMr A. Duval: Is the Minister aware that there is a dire need of decisions to be taken by \nthese councils as their statutory … \nMadam Speaker: That’s good! That’s your question! \n\n54 \n \n \nMr A. Duval:  … framework provide and that since eight months, as he has admitted \nhimself, they are paralysed. Is that acceptable to the taxpayer? \nDr. Sukon: Let me tell the hon. Member, for the first time we have doubled the number of \nstudents following medical courses at University of Mauritius and the programmes are running \nwell. \nThe programme depends on a number of professionals working part-time in our hospitals, \nboth public and private. So, I can assure the hon. Member that I am fully aware and the situation \nis under control. \nMadam Speaker:  Last! \nMr A. Duval: That is precisely, Madam Speaker… \nMadam Speaker:  No, do not make statements! \nMr A. Duval: …because of operational capacity now, because of the number of students \nthat have increased while the operational capacity has been fully stretched out and needs a \nCouncil to appoint new personnel. \nDr. Sukon: The hon. Member has taken the example of Medicine where we need both \npeople who are practising. So, we depend a lot on part-time tutors that the universities can recruit \nunder their own regulation because they are not full-time. \nSo, I can assure the hon. Member that the universities are allowed to take professionals \nwho are practising because they need to teach our students about the practical skills and this is \nbeing done. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Next question! Give me time now to find where I am. There is \none question which has already been replied, that is, question B/742, that we have already had.  \nERNEST FLORENT, OLIVIA & BRAMSTHAN – FOOTBALL PLAYGROUNDS – \nUPGRADING OF AMENITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/742",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 742,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Dr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/742) Dr. R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether in regard to the football playgrounds in the Villages \nof Ernest Florent, Olivia and Bramsthan, he will state if consideration will be given to prioritise \nthe building or upgrading of toilet facilities thereat. \n\n55",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/733) \nMadam Speaker: So, now we move on to Second Member for Quartier Militaire and \nMoka, Dr. Ms Thannoo! \nCONSERVATOIRE NATIONAL DE MUSIQUE FRANÇOIS MITTERRAND – PART-\nTIME MUSIC TEACHERS – REMUNERATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/743",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 743,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/743) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo ( Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Arts and Culture  whether, in regard to the part-time music teachers \ncurrently working at the Conservatoire National de Musique François Mitterrand, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Conservatoire, information as to whether they have been \npaid their full salary based on their recorded working hours since February 2025 to date and, if \nnot, why not, indicating if measures will be taken to ensure that all part-time employees are duly \npaid according to contractual regulations.",
      "answer": "Mr Gondeea: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Conservatoire National de Musique \nFrançois Mitterrand, that the part-time music teachers do not receive any salary but are instead \nremunerated based on the number of hours that they have worked during a month. \nAs per my information, they have received their remuneration up to June 2025. However, \nthe compensation component based on actual hours worked has not been paid since March 2025. \nThis delay has been attributed to the payroll software licence not being renewed on time by \nthe Conservatoire, leading to its expiry at the end of February 2025. Consequently, all \ncalculations are being done manually, which has significantly slowed down the process. \nMadam Speaker, it is unfortunate that I have come to learn of this matter only through the \npresent Parliamentary Question. I do not accept that staff should be penalised due to poor \nplanning by the management of Conservatoire. With only 46 part time music teachers and \nadequate administrative staff in place, such computations could and should have been done using \nbasic tools like Excel Spreadsheets. The delay is therefore unjustified. I have given clear \ninstructions that all outstanding compensations, including arrears must be paid in full by the end \nof this month.  \nAt the same time, the Conservatoire has been directed to initiate procurement exercise for \nthe renewal of its payroll software without further delay. Additionally, I have requested an \n\n56 \n \n \ninternal investigation to determine the reasons behind this situation, where necessary appropriate \naction will be taken to ensure that similar lapses do not occur in the future. \nMadam Speaker, I will not tolerate administrative inefficiency that delays fair and timely \npayment to employees. We remain committed to uploading transparency, accountability and \ngood governance across all public institutions.  \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nYes, Dr. Ms Thannoo? Is it alright?  \nOkay. So, now I have the hon. Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River \nSouth East, Dr. Saumtally! \nLEGAL AID & LEGAL ASSISTANCE ACT 2025 – ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA & \nPROCEDURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/744",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 744,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Dr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/744) Dr. R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) asked \nthe Attorney-General whether, in regard to the new eligibility criteria and procedures provided \nfor under the Legal Aid and Legal Assistance Act 2025, he will state if consideration will be \ngiven for measures to be taken to facilitate access to legal aid and legal assistance to residents in \nrural areas, including in Constituency No. 10 such as Montagne Blanche and Grand River South \nEast, through local information campaigns or designated officers in courts.",
      "answer": "Mr Glover: Madam Speaker, the new eligibility criteria for legal aid and legal assistance \nas provided for in the Act, passed by this House on 8 July, are in furtherance of this \nGovernment’s aim to facilitate access to justice in all districts of Mauritius including Rodrigues. \nThey participate towards the fulfilment of the provisions to the secured protection of the law for \nall the rights enshrined in section 10 of our Constitution. The hon. Member is therefore right to \nhighlight as others have done during the debates on this legislation, the need for a wide \ndissemination of the relevant information to members of the public. \nMay I remind the hon. Member that the Act imposes an obligation on the Court to inform a \nperson, in a language that he is conversant with, of the possibility to obtain legal aid and, at the \nstation for a police officer who intends to record the statement of a person under warning, to \n\n57 \n \n \ninform that person in case the person is not represented by a Counsel, that he may make an \napplication for legal assistance, for legal advice and counselling during the recording of his \nstatement. A resident of Constituency No. 10 will therefore benefit from this when appearing \nbefore the District Courts whether at Flacq or elsewhere or before the High Courts in Port Louis. \nThe legal duty being that of the Court, it will be fulfilled by none other than the learned \nMagistrate presiding over the case or the Judge as the case may be. \nHowever, I do agree that local information campaigns could be useful to reach citizens \neven before they get inside a Court room or a police station. I will therefore liaise with the Chief \nJustice, the Master and Registrar and the Government Information Service to look into the \npossibility of launching a campaign which would include having clear and instructive posters put \nup in public places such as post offices, community centres, Court buildings as well as \npublications in the Press and on social media. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Attorney General!  \nYes, next question, the hon. Second Member for Grand Baie and Poudre d'Or, Mr Beejan! \nLA CUVETTE PUBLIC BEACH – AMENITIES – REINSTATEMENT WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/745",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 745,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/745) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked the \nMinister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in regard to La \nCuvette Public Beach, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Beach Authority, \ninformation as to whether consideration will be given for the reinstatement thereof and provision \nthereat of – \n(a) \nadequate footpaths; \n(b) \nroad markings; \n(c) \ntraffic signs, and  \n(d) \nstreet lighting.",
      "answer": "Mr Bhagwan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I wish to inform the House that the Beach \nAuthority is presently working on a project for the upgrading of La Cuvette Public Beach which \nis one of the most popular beaches in the North. Pending the implementation of the above, \n\n58 \n \n \nreinstatement works will be carried out with regard to footpaths, road markings, traffic signs, \nstreet lighting and other amenities. Any suggestion from the hon. Member is most welcomed. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Minister inform the House whether \nadditional parking facilities will be expanded to accommodate increase in number of visitors at \nLa Cuvette, Grand Baie public beach? \nThank you. \nMr Bhagwan: This is also being taken into consideration. I think, in the near future, we \nwill conduct a site visit with all the MPs. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, great.  \nThe hon. First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart, Dr. Prayag! \nPUBLIC HEALTHCARE INSTITUTIONS – EXPATRIATES & FOREIGNERS – \nINPATIENT & OUTPATIENT SERVICE – OUTSTANDING PAYMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/746",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 746,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/746) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked the \nMinister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the expatriates and foreigners attending \npublic healthcare institutions in Mauritius as inpatients and outpatients, he will give details of the \noutstanding payment therefrom as at to date.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that up to the year 2000, all \nforeign patients including tourists, foreign students, foreign workers and other non-citizen \nvisitors or residents seeking treatment or undergoing medical investigations in our public health \ninstitutions were required to pay for their treatments. \nIn March 2001, a policy decision was taken to exempt foreign nationals holding a valid \nwork permit from the payment of inpatient treatment fees in our health institutions. In 2020, the \nMinistry proposed the waiving off of treatment fees for foreign nationals who are married to \nMauritian citizens and hold a valid residence permit. However, this proposal was deferred by the \nthen Government. \nMadam Speaker, I am pleased to inform the House that with effect from March 2025, the \nMinistry’s current policy provides for exemption of treatment fees for foreign nationals married \n\n59 \n \n \nto Mauritian citizens. This exemption applies to treatment received at public hospitals and \nhealthcare facilities, subject to the production of relevant documentary evidence such as \nmarriage certificate and proof of residence. Furthermore, foreigners holding a valid work permit \nor occupational permit continue to benefit from exemption from treatment fees under the same \npolicy. There have been instances where foreign patients have sought treatment at regional \nhospitals without the financial means to cover the cost. On humanitarian grounds and in line with \nthe principles of universal access to healthcare, such patients have not been denied treatment. \nAccordingly, there have been several cases in which medical care has been provided to these \nindividuals, free of charge. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to outstanding payments owed by expatriates and foreign \nnationals for treatment received by public healthcare institutions, I am informed that the total \noutstanding amount for inpatients currently stands at Rs360,970 for five patients. \nMadam Speaker, I further wish to inform the House that hospitals are actively following up \nwith patients to recover outstanding fees. In cases where patients are facing financial difficulties, \npayment facilities are granted, allowing them to settle their treatment fees in instalments. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you. In view of this current Government’s interest in making \nhealthcare available to all, may I ask the hon. Minister whether, his Ministry would recommend \nthe use of visual display units in each different hospital, that would depict the services that are \nprovided to expats – \n(i) \nwhich services against type of payment;  \n(ii) \nwhich services would be free such as in emergency cases, and  \n(iii) as you rightly said, there are now some who have been exempted and that at least, for \nany expatriate who goes to our public hospital, they know beforehand what is \nawaiting them in terms of payment. \nThank you. \nMr Bachoo: Well, I will look into the suggestion made by the hon. Member. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, sounds reasonable. Thank you.  \n\n60 \n \n \nNow we have the hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues, Mr Edouard! \nRODRIGUES - UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PROJECT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/747",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 747,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research",
      "question": "(No. B/747) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nTertiary Education, Science and Research whether, in regard to the difficulties faced by \nRodrigues students attending the University in Mauritius, he will state if consideration will be \ngiven for the implementation of the university campus project in Rodrigues, proposed prior to \n2014.",
      "answer": "Dr. Sukon: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Member for this question.  \nI am informed that there are 716 students from Rodrigues who are currently pursuing their \nacademic endeavours across diverse range of courses offered within our public higher education \ninstitutions. \nIt is important to note that since the inception of my Ministry, we have received no formal \nrepresentation concerning any difficulties experienced by our Rodriguans scholars in their \neducational pursuits.  \nI also wish to highlight that students from Rodrigues, who are enrolled in undergraduate \nprogrammes, derive full benefit from Free Tertiary Education Scheme. Indeed, it bears emphasis \nthat all students who hold citizenship of the Republic of Mauritius are afforded precisely the \nsame educational facilities and opportunities without distinction.  \nFurthermore, I am advised that the University of Mauritius maintains a specialised Student \nFinancial Assistance Fund, expressly designed to provide support to students from economically \ndisadvantaged backgrounds in Rodrigues. \nMadam Speaker, in our endeavour to enhance accessibility and remove administrative \nimpediments, we have instituted comprehensive digital platforms for course registration, \ndelivery, fee settlement, thereby obviating the necessity for superfluous travel. Most notably, \nstudents may now submit their requisite documents directly to the Commission for Vocational \nTraining in Rodrigues for the purposes of University of Mauritius registration. \nConcurrently, our higher education institutions maintain a systematic programme of \ndeploying academic and non-academic personnel to Rodrigues to deliver crucial face to face \n\n61 \n \n \ninstruction as well as to conduct assessment and exams, thereby ensuring that programme \nintegrity and academic excellence are uncompromisingly maintained. \nMadam Speaker, with respect to physical infrastructure, I am informed that Polytechnics \nMauritius Ltd. (PML) presently maintains two operational campuses in Rodrigues, situated at \nBaie Malgache and Mont Lubin, respectively. Of particular significance, PML has formulated a \ncomprehensive extension project for Rodrigues Baie Malgache Campus, which currently awaits \ndeliberation by the appropriate commission within the Rodrigues Regional Assembly.  \nThe strategic expansion shall furnish four supplementary teaching facilities, thereby \nsubstantially augmenting our capacity to deliver an expanded curriculum and accommodate a \ngreater number of students.  \nI wish to reaffirm this Government’s steadfast and unequivocal commitment to providing \ninclusive educational opportunities for every citizen of our Republic. This commitment \nnecessarily encompasses our aspiration to establish a consolidated campus facility capable of \nserving multiple educational institutions, contingent upon the availability of the requisite \nfinancial resources. \nThe academic aspirations and intellectual advancement of the Rodriguan youth constitute \nmatters of supreme importance to this administration. All future policy formulation shall be \ninformed by our abiding principles of national unity and our unwavering dedication to ensuring \nequitable access to educational excellence for all our citizens.  \nI should be most grateful if the hon. Member would favour my Ministry with any \nsuggestion and observation that might serve to further enhance the academic experience of our \nesteemed Rodriguan students within our public higher education system. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes, Mr Edouard! \nMr Edouard: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I thank the hon. Minister for his reply. Will the \nhon. Minister consider the difficulties faced by the Rodriguan students in Mauritius in relation to \nlodging, which is very expensive here? How the Minister can help, please? Thank you. \nDr. Sukon: I would be most willing to meet them and discuss the issue further. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \n\n62 \n \n \nHon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nLOCAL FOOTBALL CLUBS – FOREIGN PLAYERS – RECRUITMENT CONDITIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/748",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 748,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/748) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked the \nMinister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to the recruitment of foreign \nfootball players by local clubs, he will give details of the conditions attached thereto.",
      "answer": "Mr Uteem: Madam Speaker, the employment of foreign workers under a work permit is \ngoverned by the Non-Citizens (Employment Restriction) Act. The Act makes provisions, \namongst others, for guidelines which sets out the steps to be taken by the applicant and the \ndocuments to be provided when applying for a work permit. \nApplication for a work permit in respect of foreign workers, including foreign football \nplayers, must be submitted via the National e-Licensing System (NELS) of the Economic \nDevelopment Board. At the time of application, the club should submit – \n• \na covering letter from the relevant club, specifying the player’s accommodation \ndetails;  \n• \nDomestic Transfer Certificate or an International Transfer Certificate, as the case \nmay be; \n• \na recent cashflow statement from the applicant for the specified season; \n• \na No Objection Letter from the Mauritius Football Association, indicating the season \nduring which the player will participate and the name of the receiving club; \n• \nadditional supporting documents such as the club’s Certificate of Association; \n• \na passport size photograph of the player; \n• \na copy of the player’s valid passport; \n• \nprovisional medical clearance valid for six months; \n• \na vetted employment contract, and \n• \na No Objection Letter from the previous employer for inter-club transfer. \n\n63 \n \n \nMadam Speaker, work permits for foreign players are issued for one season at a time and \nmay be renewed for an additional season subject to the approval of the residence permit by the \nPrime Minister’s Office. Players must be aged between 18 and 60 years.  \nThe general conditions attached to the employment of non-citizens, including foreign \nplayers, are as follows – \n• \nA work permit is issued to a particular non-citizen and the work permit is not \ntransferrable. \n• \nThe non-citizen is not permitted to seek or accept alternative employment while in \nMauritius or to engage in any trade, art or gainful occupation.  \n• \nThe permit should be kept by the holder and produced to any authorised person on \ndemand or within three days after demand at such police station as may be specified \nby the authorised person at the time of the demand. \n• \nThe permit may be varied or cancelled at any time. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the Ministry of Youth and Sports that the present policy \nis to allow football clubs to recruit up to three foreign players for the Super League and up to two \nforeign players for the National First Division League.  \nMoreover, in order to ensure quality players, the Ministry of Youth and Sports has \nrequested the National Sports Federation to include in their internal rules that local clubs would \nonly be allowed to recruit foreign players who have played at the highest national division of \ntheir country of origin for the last two years. \nMadam Speaker: Question! \nMr Quirin: À son niveau, l’honorable ministre a-t-il reçu des représentations officielles de \nla Mauritius Football Association en vue d’augmenter le quota de joueurs étrangers par club de \ntrois à cinq ? Si oui, quelles sont les raisons qui ont été avancées par la MFA par rapport à cette \ndemande ? \n Mr Uteem: Madam Speaker, I am not aware of the request to increase the number of \nfootballers from the MFA. It will be directed to the Ministry of Youth and Sports. My Ministry \nwill stand guided by whatever policy is decided at the level of the Ministry of Youth and Sports. \n\n64 \n \n \nMadam Speaker: Yes!  \nMr Quirin: Une dernière question. \nMadam Speaker: Oui, allez-y! \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente, le ministre peut-il informer la Chambre des mesures \nmises en place pour s’assurer que les règlements ne soient pas contournés, notamment dans les \ncas où un joueur professionnel est recruté alors qu’il est initialement entré à Maurice sous le \nstatut de travailleur ? \nMr Uteem: Madam Speaker, the hon. Member should know that work permit is issued by \nmy Ministry, but residence permit is issued by the Prime Minister’s Office. So, very often, when \na foreign worker comes to Mauritius on a tourist visa, he is not allowed to then apply for a work \npermit. The Prime Minister’s Office will object to it.  \nSo, in the case that the hon. Member has mentioned, probably, the Prime Minister’s Office \nwill object to a work permit being issued to the foreign football player. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, next question! \nThe hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES HEALTH SERVICES – MEDICAL HEALTH AUDIT – STRATEGIC \nIMPROVEMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/749",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 749,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/749) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nHealth and Wellness whether, in regard to the health services challenges prevailing in Rodrigues, \nhe will state if consideration will be given for the carrying out of a full medical health audit \nthereat by his Ministry with the collaboration of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly with a view \nto defining strategic priorities for improved positive health and patient outcomes.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, the Rodrigues Commission for Health operates under the \numbrella of Rodrigues Regional Assembly and is the primary governing body for health services \nin Rodrigues. The Commission for Health collaborates with my Ministry but maintains its \ndistinct co-operational structure within the Rodrigues Regional Assembly. My Ministry provides \nsupport and collaborates with the Commission on specific health projects in Rodrigues. \n\n65 \n \n \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that a delegation headed by the Commissioner \nfor Health and others were in Mauritius in May 2025. Following discussions, it was proposed to \nassess the strengths and weaknesses of the health services in Rodrigues. Subsequently, a team \ncomprising of the Director of Health Services, the Biomedical Engineer and the Senior \nHealthcare Technologist of my Ministry proceeded to Rodrigues from 09 to 14 June 2025 to \ncarry out an analysis of the major medical equipment in various departments including their \nmedical laboratory at Queen Elizabeth Hospital.  \nFollowing the evaluation of their medical equipment, including respiratory devices and \nanaesthesia work stations in Rodrigues, various shortcomings have been identified as follows – \na) \nHealthcare technologists have not been recruited to cater for life support and critical \nequipment; this is a very serious shortcoming; \nb) \nPreventive maintenance has not been carried out in a systematic manner; \nc) \n6 ICU ventilators were lying idle at Mont Lubin Isolation Centre, and \nd) \nUnused equipment stored in poor environmental conditions that may lead to \nunnecessary breakdown. \nThe Report also provides a number of recommendations with a view to implementing good \npractices in the utilisation of these machines so as to minimise the risk of unnecessary \nbreakdown and causing disruption of essential services. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that pursuant to an invitation by the Commission of \nRodrigues for Health, a high-level dialysis capacity assessment mission was conducted by the \nNational Dialysis Coordinator in Rodrigues from 19 to 23 June 2025. To evaluate the current \nstatus and future needs of renal care services, this mission provided a strategic platform to assess \nservice delivery and identify areas for improvement at the Rodrigues Dialysis Unit at Queen \nElizabeth Hospital in Crève-Coeur. Madam Speaker, my Ministry acts promptly whenever a \nweakness in the health services is reported.  \nNow, as regard to carrying out a full medical health audit in Rodrigues is concerned, this \nwill require time and expert resources. I, therefore, propose to approach the World Health \nOrganisation and request the services of an expert to carry out the full medical health audit in \nRodrigues. \n\n66 \n \n \nMadam Speaker, notwithstanding our proposal, I wish to reassure the hon. Member, that \nmy Ministry will continue to provide assistance with the Commission for Health for the \nreference of patients from Rodrigues to Mauritius for comprehensive treatment and care, \ncapacity building of medical and para-medical staff, sensitisation of the population on various \npublic health issues and non-communicable diseases, evaluation on the accessibility and quality \nof health services, state-of-the-art equipment, modern infrastructure among others. \nMadam Speaker, in this context, a multidisciplinary team will be set up to collaborate with \nthe Rodrigues Regional Assembly so as to achieve improved health equity, better service \ndelivery and enhanced patient outcomes aligned with the principle of universal health coverage \nand I propose to lead the high-powered level delegation to Rodrigues in the coming month to \nlook into these aspects. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes! Don’t comment, questions ! \nMr François: I was going to comment. \nMadam Speaker: No, then you sit down! I am sorry. I am saying it very nicely. You are \nnot here to comment. \nThe hon. Second Member for Savanne and Black River! \nNLTA – PUBLIC SERVICE VEHICLE LICENCES – BUSES – 2014 TO 2024 – \nMONETARY ALLOCATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/750",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 750,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/750) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Public Service Vehicle Licences for buses, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, \ninformation as to the number thereof allocated annually for each of the years 2014 to 2024, \nindicating the monetary allocations granted to each new holder thereof in respect of the – \n(a)  Student Free Fare Scheme;  \n(b)  Free Travel Scheme for Persons with Disabilities;  \n(c)  Free Travel Scheme for Pensioners, and  \n(d)  any other subsidies applicable, indicating if same are allocated for a definite or \nindefinite period. \n\n67",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the NLTA that 53 new road \nservice licenses were allocated during the period 2014 to 2024. Same includes four road service \nlicences and 49 temporary road service licences. The three road service licences were allocated \nto UBS and four to RHT in 2022.  \nAs such, no additional disbursement was made to these two bus companies in respect of \ntheir seven road service licences with regard to free travel compensation and other subsidies. Out \nof the remaining 46 licences allocated to the individual bus operators, a total of 44 RSLs were \neffectively implemented and, subsequently, these operators have benefited from free travel \ncompensation and other subsidies, namely – \n• \nDiesel subsidies, and  \n• \nOther financial support which includes interim allowance. \nAccording to information obtained from the NLTA, Madam Speaker, a total sum of Rs72.5 \nmillion was disbursed for all the 44 newly implemented RSLs.  \nAs regard to the last part of the question, I wish to inform the House that the NLTA has \nalready been requested to carry out a holistic survey to determine among others as to whether \nthere is still need to maintain the existing temporary Road Service Licences. Subsequently, a \ndecision will be taken. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! Go ahead! \nMr Jugurnauth: Madam Speaker, as mentioned in the previous PQ, the hon. Minister \ninformed the House that an inquiry will be set up according to the 49 RSLs issued, whether the \ninquiry has been set up, if yes, where matters stand? \nMr Osman Mahomed: There is now a new management at the NLTA and they are looking \nat it afresh. At that time, there was the previous management which were implied in this sorrow \nstate of affairs. So, in due time, we will come to the House with a conclusion of the findings. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nHon. Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue! \n \n\n68 \n \n \nFINES & FIXED PENALTY NOTICES – ONLINE PAYMENT – \nOPERATIONALITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/751",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 751,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/751) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Attorney-General whether, in regard to the payment of fines and fixed penalty \nnotices, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to if consideration will be \ngiven for same to be payable online and, if so, when and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Glover: Madam Speaker, the Road Traffic Act was amended in 2019 by Act 24 of \n2019 so as to facilitate payment of fixed penalties. Accordingly, a new section 192 (3) of the \nRoad Traffic Act makes provision for a person who has been served with a fixed penalty notice \nto electronically pay the fine from the date of the offence. However, I wish to inform the House \nthat the amendments brought to the Road Traffic Act in 2019 have not yet been proclaimed and, \ntherefore, are not in force.  \nI am informed by the Master and Registrar of the Supreme Court that the system at the \nJudiciary is ready to accept online payment for fixed penalty notices through the Supreme Court \nPortal using e-payment facility such as credit cards, debit cards, MauCAS QR Code and account \ntransfer. Once the 2019 amendments are proclaimed, online payment for fixed penalty notices \nwill therefore be activated. \nMadam Speaker, I therefore propose to liaise with the Minister of Land Transport so that \nthe necessary be made to proclaim the relevant provisions of the Road Traffic (Amendment) Act \nNo.3 of 2019 and to consider any further amendments to the Road Traffic Act so as to extend \nonline payments by a person who has been served with the photographic enforcement devise \nnotice, that is, speed cameras. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! Okay, good! \nThe hon. First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix, Mr Lobine! For your previous \nquestion there will be a written reply. Now you have a chance to have a go at it! \nMr Lobine: Thank you!  \n \n \n\n69 \n \n \nRAMSAR CONVENTION – NATIONAL WETLANDS POLICY & ACTION PLAN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/752",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 752,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/752) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in regard to \nthe number and surface area of protected wet lands currently recognized under the Ramsar \nConvention and any other relevant legislation, he will state – \n(a)  where matters stand regarding the implementation of the national wetlands policy \nand action plan;  \n(b)  the number of encroachments, illegal constructions and backfilling done on wetlands \nover the past five years, and  \n(c)  the measures being taken to prevent further loss and degradation of the wetlands.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries (Dr. A. Boolell): Thank you, very, Madam Speaker. Madam Speaker, with your permission, I shall reply \nto the question put by hon. First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix.  \nAn island-wide survey was carried out in 2009 and around 237 sites were identified and \nlisted as wetlands. Now, the list was reviewed in 2018, using remote sensing technology where \nsome 1,000 areas were listed as potentially being wetlands. Presently, a consultancy is on-going \nat the level of the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change in \ncollaboration with the National Parks and Conservation Service to establish the listed sites. \nIn addition, following the enactment of the Environment Act 2024, coastal fresh water \nmarshlands and upland marshlands which are wetlands, were identified as Environmentally \nSensitive Areas, which require an Environmental Impact Assessment licence prior to any \ndevelopment thereat.  \nMadam Speaker, the National Parks and Conservation Service is responsible for the \nimplementation of the Ramsar Convention which includes the management, preservation and \nprotection of wetlands across Mauritius and the preservation of the rich biodiversity located \nthereat. The National Parks and Conservation Service has also been entrusted with the \nresponsibility, as the enforcement agency, following the enactment of the Environment Act of \n2024. Also, a National Ramsar Committee was set up in January 2004 at the level of the Ministry \nto assist in the implementation of a Ramsar Convention.  \n\n70 \n \n \nThe National Ramsar Committee is also responsible for the monitoring and protection of \nwetlands through conditions attached to Building and Land Use Permits, wherever a wetland is \npresent or is in the vicinity of any development. In fact, since 2006, no development on wetlands \nunder 30 metre buffer zone is allowed.  \nMadam Speaker, concerning part (b) of the enactment of the Environment Act 2024, I am \ninformed that a total of 36 cases pertaining to encroachment, illegal construction and backfilling \ndone on wetlands have been reported to the Ministry of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue \nEconomy and Fisheries. And, 54 such cases have been recorded at the level of the National Parks \nand Conservation Service over the last five years.  \nFurthermore, I am informed that three stop orders have been issued by the Ministry of \nEnvironment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change for stopping such illegal activities \nand ordering the contraveners to restore the wetland area to its original site. \nMadam Speaker, wetlands with a rich biodiversity, form part of the natural capital and \neach reported case of encroachment, illegal construction and backfilling, is one too many. To \nfurther reinforce the protection of wetland, government agreed, in May this year, to the drafting \nof a Wetland Bill and Wetlands Regulations which will be dedicated for the protection, \nmanagement, restoration and enforcement measure for the preservation of all wetlands across the \nRepublic of Mauritius. Through the enactment of this legislation, a new impetus will be given; \nthe long-term sustainability of wetlands.   \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister.  \nAre you alright? Yes.  \nThe hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes. \nMOTOR VEHICLE INSURANCE ARBITRATION COMMITTEE – CASES – 2019-2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/753",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 753,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/753) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Motor Vehicle Insurance Arbitration \nCommittee, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to the number \nof cases heard and determined thereat over the period 2019 to 2024, indicating the outcome \nthereof, in each case. \nMadam Speaker: Heureusement que le Ministre sait courir…  \n\n71",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Sorry Madam Speaker, it was an urgent matter regarding a \nCabinet Paper. Thank you.  \nMadam Speaker:  I am sure it was urgent.  \nMr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, the Motor Vehicle Insurance Arbitration \nCommittee (MVIAC) has been established under the Road Traffic Act to determine disputes \narising between two insurers or between a policy holder and an insurer regarding their respective \nliability on the amount of compensation to be paid following a road accident, not involving \nbodily injuries. \nThe MVIAC usually sits in four divisions where each division is presided by the \nChairperson or a Vice-Chairperson. From 2019 to 2024, a total number of 4,776 cases was \nlodged at the MVIAC, out of which, 2,819 cases were determined, that is, a ruling was issued or \nthe case was set aside. Furthermore, for 322 cases, the MVIAC is still awaiting clarification for \nthe cases to be determined.  \nIt is to be noted, Madam Speaker, that for the same period, 1635 cases have remained \nunattended by the previous Chairperson and the three Vice-Chairpersons.  \nHowever, I can reassure the House that the MVIAC has been reconstituted since April this \nyear and the new team has been requested to mop up this huge backlog.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes.  \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Would the hon. Minister inform \nthe House whether, the situation involving 1635 cases, has caused hardship to the victims \nconcerned? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Certainly, because this is the last recourse that they can have \nbecause the MVIAC is like some sort of a tribunal. So, if the cases are not determined, people \nwill face hardships.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes.  \nMs Anquetil: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can we know who is the Chairperson of the \nMotor Vehicle Insurance Arbitration Committee? Thank you. \nMr Osman Mahomed: You mean the person between that period in time? \n\n72 \n \n \nMs Anquetil: Yes. \nMr Osman Mahomed: It was Mr Didier Dodin.   \nMadam Speaker: Okay. The hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River, Mr \nBabajee.  \nCOTEAU RAFFIN & CASE NOYALE (EUCALYPTUS) – STATE LAND – \nRESIDENTIAL SQUATTING – REGULARISATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/754",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 754,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/754) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the plots of State land at Coteau Raffin and \nCase Noyale (Eucalyptus), he will state the number of persons/families squatting same, \nindicating if the regularisation of the situation thereof is being contemplated and, if so, give \ndetails thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I am informed that as at March 2025, there \nwere 52 cases of residential squatting on state land at Coteau Raffin and four cases at Karo \nKaliptis, Case Noyale. \nIn 2015, the then Ministry of Housing and Lands decided to regularise, as far as possible, \nall pre-July 2015 residential squatters. In regards to Coteau Raffin, the cases of 39 out of 41 pre-\nJuly 2015 were regularised in situ in 2017 whilst three documents are yet to be submitted by the \ntwo remaining families to enable regularisation.  \nMy Ministry has already made a request to the CEB and the CWA for proper provision of \nelectricity and water supply for these 39 families. An amount of Rs47 million has been provided \nin the Budget Estimates of 2025-2026 of my Ministry for the provision of electricity and water \nsupply to four regions including Coteau Raffin.  \nI am informed that the CEB and CWA are facing serious challenges to provide the utilities \nto the families concerned due to lack of proper road access. My Ministry is coordinating with all \nrelevant authorities with a view to facilitating both the CEB and the CWA.  \nMadam Speaker, in regard to Karo Kaliptis, Case Noyale, I am also informed that \nfollowing the regularisation, in situ, of 39 cases of residential squatting in 2013, there remains 4 \ncases of residential squatting which need to be addressed. Two cases concern pre-2015 squatters \nthat can only be regularised after existing encroachments issues are sorted out.  \n\n73 \n \n \nIn so far, as the post 2015 residential squatters – because it keeps coming pre and post – \nmy Ministry is working on recommendations that I propose to submit to government in due \ncourse.  \nHowever, Members will appreciate that addressing the issue of squatters on state lands is \nindeed a complex one due to different types of constraints such as encroachment, sites being \nfound on river reserves, wetlands, nature parks, public beaches, topography of lands, flood-prone \nareas amongst others. For example, in Coteau Raffin, I am informed that 8 out of the 52 post-\nJuly 2015 squatters are found on Comptesse La Marque public beach and most of the remaining \n44 cases are found either within 30 metres of the high-water mark or on marshy lands rendering \ntheir regularisation in situ, impossible.  \nAnd, Madam Speaker, let me conclude by saying, that is some of the consequences the \nthen Member of Parliament and Minister of that Constituency, going to promise land to everyone \nin order to have votes in return. And this is what you have as a result of telling people to go and \ntake plots of land, to vote for him and in return, he will get them the lease but not knowing and \nnot even observing, where they are going to take the land. Some of them ended up on the public \nbeaches, some ended up on marshland and less than 30 metres from the high-water mark.  \nThank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister.  \nYes! \nMr Babajee: Will the hon. Minister consider improving the road access to make it a public \nroad as some people are sick and ambulances cannot get access to them? \nMr Mohamed: As I said, we are working with all of the relevant agencies and Ministries \nin order to find solutions.  \nNow, obviously, with regard to road access, I will have to speak to the relevant authorities. \nThat would be either the local authority or any other relevant department that would be able to \nfind the solution and the budget in order to build the roads.  \nSo, yes, it is an urgent matter. But the other matter is that there are other people who have \nregistered with the NHDC and who are patiently waiting for houses, as opposed to squatters who \ncome to land and do not register for NHDC houses and expect to have electricity, water, land \n\n74 \n \n \ngiven and paid by the State. I know there is an urgency in order to give them houses, but we have \nto be able to balance things as it should. Resources have to be used efficiently and reasonably, \nand not simply being obtained by simply asking. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister.  \nNow, the Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne, hon. Caserne! \nABERCROMBIE MARKET FAIR – COURT JUDGMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025",
        "tuesday-07-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/755",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 755,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/755) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Court Judgment in \nrelation to the Abercrombie Market Fair, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nMunicipal City Council of Port Louis, information as to the outcome thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, the Abercombie Market Fair Project stands as a textbook \ncase of administrative failure and poor decision making by the previous government. Despite \nbeing initiated in the year 2019, the project faced repeated delays and technical dispute between \nthe consultant and the contractor. Matters escalated when the contractor erected a structure \nwithout formal approval, and structural deficiency later identified issues that could have been \navoided with proper oversight. \nInstead of resolving the matter professionally, the former government hastily terminated \nthe contract in May 2023. Based on legal advice from Counsel, Ms Roubina Jadoo-Jaunbocus, \nSenior Counsel, Mr Ravin Chetty, and with the endorsement of the then Vice-Prime Minister, Dr. \nHusnoo, the Minister of Energy, hon. Joe Lesjongard, and the Minister of National Infrastructure, \nMr Hurreeram, this termination was done without valid cause. \nMadam Speaker, as a direct consequence of that decision, the contractor initiated an \narbitration proceeding. The award of the arbitration tribunal was delivered on 09 May 2025 and \nit was in favour of the contractor. The tribunal ordered the Municipal City Council of Port Louis \nto pay an amount of Rs25,386,061 to the contractor. \nHowever, following the retention of an escrow amount and the detection of tax deduction \nat source, the Council had to disburse an amount Rs21,257,112.33 to the contractor. After nearly \nsix years, Madam Speaker, only 21% of the works have been completed, and the people of Port \nLouis are left to bear the cost of this grave misjudgement. \n\n75 \n \n \nMadam Speaker, in view of the complexity and gravity of the matter, I am tabling the \nfollowing documents for the benefit of the hon. Member – \n• \nA copy of the arbitration award; \n• \nThe name of the arbitrator and parties involved; \n• \nFull timeline and status of that project; \n• \nDetails of the procurement and contract termination; \n• \nLegal opinions received from Counsel, Ms Roubina Jadoo-Jaunbocus, and Senior \nCounsel, Mr Ravin Chetty; \n• \nRecords of the meetings chaired by the then lord mayor and attended by former \nministers; \n• \nFinancial clearance from the Ministry of Finance, and \n• \nAll supporting documents justifying the payment now being made. \nMadam Speaker, these documents clearly show how a poorly handed decision by the \nformer administration, taken without proper justification, led to financial loss and stalled the \ndevelopment. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, the hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes! \nST JEAN ROAD, QUATRE BORNES - PARKING SPACE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/756",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 756,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/756) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the insufficient parking space issue along St \nJean Road, in Quatre Bornes, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the \nshort and long-term measures being considered to address the situation.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: I am informed by the Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit \n(TMRSU) that prior to the implementation of the Metro Express project, the public used to park \ntheir vehicles in the space fronting commercial complexes on both sides bordering St Jean Road \nbetween St Jean Roundabout and Victoria Avenue. Same could accommodate approximately 190 \nvehicles with no dedicated paid parking zones. \n\n76 \n \n \nWith the implementation of the Metro Express Project in 2021, the lane configuration \nalong St Jean Road was significantly modified, resulting in substantial decrease in the number of \nparking to around 40 – ‘so, from 190 to 40’. I wish to point out that, for proper management of \nthe limited parking space, same had to be converted into paid parking.  \nFurthermore, to address the lack of parking space along St Jean Road, the TMRSU \nconstructed 70 free public parking spaces on five (5) plots of land along St Jean Road, namely at \nTulipes Road; Surath Avenue; Colombia Court; Glaïeuls Avenue, and Opposite the Metro \nStation. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes has acquired \ntwo (2) plots of land near Surath Avenue and Tulip Road to provide for 35 and 105 parking, \nrespectively, whereby works are nearing completion. \nMoreover, with the upcoming proposed Quatre Bornes Urban Terminal Project, additional \nparking facilities will be provided.  \nMadam Speaker, I wish to highlight that given the whole stretch of the St Jean Road from \nVictoria Avenue to its junction with Tulip Road is already built up on both sides, there is no \nfurther space to provide for additional parking facilities. Thank you. \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Malgré les efforts du ministère, le \nproblème de parking est persistant. Alors, can the hon. Minister inform the House whether \nconsideration will be given to implementing a smart parking management system in this area en \nattendant? Thank you.  \nMr Osman Mahomed: The hon. Member is very technology savvy! And so am I! So, I \nthink, we are on the same wave length. I can discuss with my colleagues.  \nMs Anquetil: Okay, thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister.  \nMs Anquetil: Excuse me, I have a question. \nMadam Speaker: Vous avez encore une question ? Yes, of course! I am sorry. \nMs Anquetil: This one is very important. \nMadam Speaker: I am sorry. One more question for you, hon. Ms Anquetil. \n\n77 \n \n \nNATIONAL WOMEN’S COUNCIL – EXCISE DUTY CONCESSION FORM – \nALLEGED IMPERSONATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/757",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 757,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/757) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked \nthe Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to an alleged case of \nimpersonation on an application form for excise duty concession submitted through the National \nWomen’s Council, she will state if the matter has been reported to her Ministry and, if so, \nprovide details thereof.",
      "answer": "Ms Navarre-Marie: Madam Speaker, I am informed that an alleged case of impersonation \nregarding an application form for excise duty concession submitted through the National \nWomen’s Council (NWC) was indeed reported to my Ministry. \nMadam Speaker, the application for excise duty concession was submitted to the Customs \nDepartment by the NWC in the name of Mrs N.D.G.N., currently employed as Manager since 02 \nFebruary 2021. The Customs Department issued the excise duty concession certificate on 28 \nApril 2025 as it was not clear whether the manager was eligible for the excise duty concession \non a motor vehicle on ground of her years of service. \nOn 21 June 2025, my Ministry requested the Customs Department to cancel the excise duty \nconcession certificate issued to Mrs N.D.G.N. The certificate was subsequently cancelled by the \nCustoms Department on the same day. As per normal procedure, part (b) of the application form \nfor the excise duty concession should have been filled in and signed by the Head of my Ministry. \nHowever, this part of the form was signed by the HR Officer, Senior Human Resource \nOfficer of the National Women’s Council on 28 April 2025 without the approval of my Ministry. \nConsidering the issue to be a case of impersonation, the matter has been referred to the Police on \n30 May 2025, the Central Crime Investigation Department (CCID) and the Financial Crimes \nCommission (FCC) on 18 June 2025. The case is still under investigation. \nMs Anquetil: Just one question, please! \nMadam Speaker : Of course ! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Choquant!  \n\n78 \n \n \nWill the hon. Minister indicate whether, Mrs Jugnauth Naeck, the Manager of the National \nWomen’s Council, has been informed of the alleged fraud involving her application form for an \nexcise duty concession? Thank you. \nMs Navarre-Marie: Yes, Madam. \nMadam Speaker: Now it is the time for Ms Henriette-Manan! Second time that I am \nmissing you. Go ahead! \nPUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTIONS – MIDWIFE – RECRUITMENT & \nPROMOTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/758",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 758,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/758) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the \nMinister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the post of Midwife, he will state the \nnumber of available posts thereof in the public health institutions in mainland Mauritius and in \nRodrigues, respectively and the number thereof filled, indicating over the past ten years, the \nnumber of Midwives – \n(a) \nrecruited, and \n(b) \npromoted to the post of Senior Midwife, giving details of the promotion exercises.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I am informed that in accordance to the scheme of service \nfor the post of Midwife, same is filled either – \n(a) \nby appointment of student midwife who are fully registered as midwives with the \nNursing Council in accordance with legislations in force in Mauritius, or  \n(b) \nby selection from among candidates who are fully registered as midwife with the \nNursing Council in accordance with legislations in force in Mauritius. \nIn Mauritius, presently there are 157 funded posts of Midwife available in public health \ninstitutions. 133 posts of Midwife have already been filled while there are 21 vacant posts. \nIn addition, 17 trainee midwives who have already passed their final examinations have \nbeen recommended for appointment as Midwife to the Public Service Commission on 23 January \n2025. Meanwhile, four remaining trainee midwives have passed the final examinations in June \n2025 and their appointments are being processed. \nAppointment to the grade of Midwife is initiated as and when vacancies occur. In respect \nof Rodrigues, there are 26 funded posts of Midwife out of which 17 posts have already been \n\n79 \n \n \nfilled. These posts are advertised by Rodrigues National Assembly and the recruitment is carried \nout by them. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that since 2014 to \ndate, a total of 137 candidates has been recruited as trainee Midwife in the public health \ninstitutions in Mauritius as follows – \n• In 2015 – 5; \n• In 2016 – 62; \n• In 2017 – 11; \n• In 2019 – 28; \n• In 2020 – 8; \n• In 2021 – 1; \n• In 2022 – 22. \nA total of 137. 103 have already been appointed as Midwife. Out of the 34 remaining, 24 \nare being appointed as Midwife while 13 have left the grade of trainee Midwife. As regard to \nRodrigues, I am informed that 8 candidates have been recruited as Midwife over the last 10 \nyears. \nRegarding part (b) of the question, I am informed that 42 of the midwives in Mauritius \nhave been promoted to the grade of Senior Midwife on Shift as follows – \n• In 2019 – 20; \n• In 2020 – 8; \n• In 2022 – 12, and \n• In 2024 – 2. \nA total of 42. For Rodrigues, I am apprised that none have been promoted to the grade of \nSenior Midwife and the scheme for the Senior Midwife on Shift has not yet been prescribed. \nThis matter has to be dealt at the level of Rodrigues Regional Assembly. \n\n80 \n \n \nThe House may wish to know that midwives are promoted to the post of Senior \nMidwife on the basis of experience and merit who reckon at least five years of service in a \nsubstantive capacity in the grade of Midwife. \nMadam Speaker, I am proposing to review the structure of the grade of midwifery to \nupgrade skills and competencies for improved service delivery. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister! Yes, okay, next question? Ms Henriette-\nManan, are you happy with that?  \nThe hon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle. Mr Seeburn! \n \nMARE CHICOSE LANDFILL – 2014-2024 MANAGING CONTRACTOR – FIRE \nOUTBREAKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/759",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 759,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/759) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in \nregard to the Mare Chicose Landfill Waste Site, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to – \n(a) \nwhether the contractor managing and operating same since 2014 to 2024 held a \nvalid fire certificate in respect thereof and, if not, why not, and \n(b) \nthe amount charged by the Solid Waste Management Division for managing the \nsites over the period 2014-2024, indicating the – \n(i) \nadditional funds claimed, if any, following each fire outbreak, and \n(ii) \nmeasures put in place to avert and combat future fire outbreaks.",
      "answer": "Mr Bhagwan: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question and according to \nrecords available at the Ministry, I wish to inform the House that for the period 2014 à 2024, the \nMauritius Fire and Rescue Service gave its ‘no objection’ to Mare Chicose landfill project \nsubject to a number of conditions. I have been informed that all these conditions have been \naddressed except for the installation of a permanent pressurised pipeline. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that provision was made for a pressurised firefighting \npipeline in the new contract for the vertical expansion of the landfill awarded in June 2024 to the \njoint-venture Sotravic/Strata. The design for the pipeline, including tape works, at a suitable \nlocation along the nearby La Chaux River has been prepared by the landfill Consultant, \n\n81 \n \n \nCowi/Luxconsult and already approved by the Mauritius Fire and Rescue Service. The \nconstruction of a pipeline is scheduled to start by end of November 2025. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part(b) the of the question, a total amount of Rs2.977 \nbillion was disbursed for various running contracts for the period 2014 to June 2024 to joint-\nventure Sotravic/Eneotech. \nMadam Speaker, concerning part (b)(i) of the question, I wish to inform the House that the \nperiod January 2014 to June 2024, no amount has been disbursed to the contractor for \nfirefighting. However, further to a major fire outbreak on November 2024, the contractor joint-\nventure Sotravic/Strata has submitted a contractual claim amounting to Rs33.31 million out of \nwhich an amount of Rs23.18 million has been rejected and the remaining is still being assessed \nby the Consultant. \nI have also been informed by the Mauritius Fire and Rescue Service that Mauritius Fire and \nRescue Service has submitted a claim from Rs4.7 million as expenditure incurred during the \nfirefighting at the landfill in November 2024. \nMadam Speaker, regarding part (b) (ii) of the question, I wish to inform the House that the \nlandfill has an existing contingency plan aiming to mitigate and to combat fire outbreak at the \nlandfill. Under this plan, the contractor is required to undertake, amongst others, the following – \n(i) \ndeploy standby team with a water tanker on a 24-hour basis to extinguish any fire \noutbreak; \n(ii) \ncall the Mauritius Fire and Rescue Service to combat fire if required; \n(iii) \ncarry compaction of waste and cover with salt to prevent ingress of oxygen in \naffected areas, and  \n(iv) \narrange to deploy other resources like excavators and water tankers should the \nneed arise. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister.  \nThe hon. Second Member for Savanne and Black River, Mr Jugurnauth! \nRIVIÈRE DES GALETS – BEACH EROSION – CAVADEE PLATFORM \n\n82",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/760",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 760,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/760) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in regard to \nbeach erosion in the south-west coastal regions, he will state if consideration will be given for \nthe reinstatement of the Cavadee platform at the Rivière des Galets Public Beach and, if so, when \nand under what conditions.",
      "answer": "Mr Bhagwan: Madam Speaker, the House may wish to note that in line with the Coastal \nRehabilitation Programme, the services of a consultancy firm namely, Luxconsult enlisted by my \nMinistry on 22 May 2022 for a duration of 50 months to the tune of Rs94.6 million for the design \nand supervision of coastal protection measures at 16 priority sites. \nThe 16 priority sites include among others, the Cavadee platform at Rivière des Galets. \nBased on the degree of erosion and the site’s specificity, the Consultant has recommended a \ncoastal protection and rehabilitation work thereat to the tune of Rs20.1 million including of VAT \nand also, the following works – \n(i) \nrocks revetment of an approximate length 110 metres along the riverbank.  \n(ii) \nreinstatement of existing concrete steps to allow safe access to the river.  \n(iii) \nconstruction of wing walls for clearly demarcating the revetment and the steps; \n(iv) \nupgrading of the existing areas and access to the site, and  \n(v) \nalso provision of lighting facilities along the path and within the Cavadee platform \narea. \nMadam Speaker, the project requires an EIA. An Environmental Impact Assessment \nlicence and consultations are currently ongoing with stakeholders for the finalisation of the EIA. \nUpon completion of the EIA process, the Consultant will be requested to prepare the tender \ndocuments and a request for funds will accordingly be made to the Ministry of Finance. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. The hon. Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka, \nDr. Ms Thannoo! \n \nPRIMARY & SECONDARY STATE SCHOOLS – COUNSELLING SERVICE – \nNEEDY STUDENTS \n\n83",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/761",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 761,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/761) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the primary and \nsecondary State schools, he will state the number of psychologists currently providing services to \nstudents thereat, indicating the – \n(a) \nnumber of sessions to which the students are – \n(i) \nentitled, and \n(ii) \nbenefitting, and \n(b)  \nadditional number of psychologists that will be required to ensure provision of \nprofessional level services to all needy students in the immediate future.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, the well-being of all our students remains a top \npriority for my Ministry. In a world increasingly marked by emotional and psychological \nchallenges, we have an increasing number of students who require support from psychologists. \nThe National Education Counselling Service operating under the purview of my Ministry \ncontinues to provide psychological and social support of those students who require such \nservices. \nIn regard to the Primary and Secondary State Schools, I am informed that there are \ncurrently 39 educational psychologists providing services to students across the Republic of \nMauritius. Psychological support is extended to students with the formal consent of parents or \nguardians to ensure that the latter are kept informed and are involved at every stage of the \nsupport process. \nWith regard to paragraphs (a)(i) and (ii) of the question, I am informed that each student \nrequiring psychological support is entitled to as many sessions as deemed necessary, depending \non the severity of the case and the outcome of the professional assessment conducted and during \nthe period January to June 2025, a total of 1,616  students were referred for the first time for \npsychological support services and a total of 9,207 counselling sessions were carried out. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that an additional 42 educational \npsychologists would be required to ensure the timely and adequate provision of psychological \nsupport to all students in need. However, due to budgetary constraints, provision for their \nrecruitment could not be considered during this present budget.  \n\n84 \n \n \nIn the meantime, to address the existing shortage, 22 educational social workers are \nproviding essential support services through home visits, case interventions, parental guidance \nand community outreach. Between January and June 2025, these officers have attended 1,069 \nnew cases and conducted 2,094 home visits but they also conduct sensitisation sessions for \nstudents and parents on issues such as child protection, emotional wellbeing, discipline and \nresilience. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes, good?  \nThe hon. Second Member for Grand Baie and Poudre d’Or, Mr Beejan! \nBUS ROUTES 21, 227 & 82 – REGULAR & RELIABLE TRANSPORT SERVICES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/762",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 762,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/762) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to bus routes 21, 227 and 82, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority (NLTA), information as \nto the – \n(a) \nremedial measures undertaken or envisaged to ensure regular and reliable public \ntransport services along same, and  \n(b) \ndates and number of surprise checks carried out by officers of the NLTA on each \nroute over the past three months.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the NLTA that the daily \noperations of buses supplying routes 21, 227 and 82 which operate from Belmont to Port Louis \nare monitored by ten regulators posted at Belmont Traffic Centre, Trois Bras Checkpoint and \nPort Louis, the new transportation centre. I am made to understand that the main problems along \nthese routes relate to the aging fleet, entailing frequent breakdowns and missed trips. According \nto figures provided by the NLTA, at least ten buses are reported non-operational each day due to \nmechanical failures, especially among vehicles over 17-years old and a persistent shortage of \ncrew, including drivers and conductors. \nI wish to inform the House that the Bus Modernisation Scheme was revamped to cater for \nthe purchase of high-floor buses and bus operators are accordingly making necessary \n\n85 \n \n \narrangements for the renewal of their fleet. That means they made applications for support from \nGovernment.  \nAs regards shortage of crew, my Ministry is working closely with the Ministry of Labour \nand Industrial Relations to facilitate the recruitment of foreign labour. Madam Speaker, despite \nthe constraints of acute shortage of staff, including at the level of the NLTA Inspectorate, the \nlatter has continued to undertake monitoring and enforcement.  \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am apprised that 23 surprise checks have been \nconducted along routes 21, 227 and 82 whereby 29 contraventions have been established. I am \ntabling the dates on which surprise checks have been conducted. It is to be pointed out that these \nchecks have been further reinforced since mid-June this year with the enlistment of 13 \nManagement Support Officers who are providing assistance to the NLTA Inspectorate, pending \nthe recruitment of Road Transport Inspectors. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes, hon. Mr François! \nMAURITIUS INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION – AWARD COURSES – JULY/AUGUST \n2025 INTAKE – RODRIGUAN STUDENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/763",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 763,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/763) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nEducation and Human Resource whether, in regard to the Mauritius Institute of Education (MIE) \nAward courses for the July/August 2025 intake for a Bachelor of Education (Hons) in Technical \nand Vocational Education and Training - B.Ed. (Hons) and a Diploma Special Education Needs, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the MIE, information as to whether suitable \nqualified candidates from Rodrigues will be able to follow same in Rodrigues and, if not, \nindicate the measures, if any, being taken for the facilitation thereof.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Mauritius Institute of Education \n(MIE) that the Bachelor of Education in Technical and Vocational Education and Training - \nB.Ed. (Hons) programme was developed at the request of the Mauritius Institute of Training and \nDevelopment (MITD) to strengthen the pedagogical competencies of its instructors, including \nthose based in Rodrigues. \n\n86 \n \n \nThe programme has been accredited by the Higher Education Commission (HEC) on 29 \nMay 2025 and has been advertised on 14 July 2025 in Mauritius and for Rodrigues. The MITD \nhad already informed the concerned instructors about the course on 2 December 2024. I am also \ninformed that the modalities for the implementation of the programme are being worked out and \nit should be designed in such a way so as to ensure the optimum use of resources and facilitate \nthe efficient and effective delivery of training courses to all interested candidates possessing the \nrequired qualifications, including those from Rodrigues. The course will be run in a hybrid mode \nin Rodrigues with a combination of online and face to face sessions facilitated by resource \npersons from the MIE. \nMadam Speaker, as for the Diploma in Special Education Needs, I am informed by the \nMIE that the intake for July/August 2025 has not been advertised in Rodrigues as the first cohort \nfrom Rodrigues is currently following the certificate course which will only be completed in \nDecember of this year. Upon completion of the certificate course, the diploma course will be \nadvertised thereat and those who have been awarded the certificate will be eligible to apply. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nOkay, the hon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle!  \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 11 – FOOTBALL PITCHES – LIGHTING PROJECTS – DELAY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/764",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 764,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/764) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the football pitches found in the \nVillages of Rivière des Créoles, Bois des Amourettes, Bambous Virieux and Grand Sable, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the District Council of Grand Port, information as \nto the reasons for the delay in implementing the Lighting Projects thereat, indicating the \nexpected completion date thereof in each case.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, at the outset, I wish to inform the hon. Member and the \nHouse that this reply will be relatively lengthy as it pertains to four different football grounds \nunder the jurisdiction of the District Council of Grand Port. The hon. Member has requested \ndetailed information regarding the history, current status, delays and future plans for lighting \n\n87 \n \n \ninstallation at the Rivière des Créoles, Bois des Amourettes, Grand Sable and Bambous Virieux \nfootball grounds.  \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that since 2017, funds were allocated annually for the \nimplementation of various capital projects by the District Council of Grand Port, including the \nupgrading of infrastructure and installation of lighting facilities. However, it is regrettable that \nthe Council, under the previous administration, did not consider the installation of lighting \nfacilities at the Rivière des Créoles football ground as a priority, despite the fact that this ground \nhas existed for over 50 years and covers an area of approximately 5,500 m2. I am further \ninformed that lighting facilities have never been provided at the Rivière des Créoles, Grand \nSable and Bois des Amourettes football grounds. It is only recently, under the current \nGovernment, that the District Council has submitted proposals for lighting works in the budget \nfor the Financial Year 2025-2026. \nAs regards Rivière des Créoles football ground, I am informed that while bleachers and \nshelters were constructed in the year 2014 at a cost of Rs377,400 and upgrading and fencing \nworks were undertaken in the same year at Rs89,239, no lighting facilities were ever installed. \nThe current proposal estimates the cost for lighting installation is at Rs4 million.  \nRegarding Bois des Amourettes football ground, the site has been in existence for more \nthan 40 years. Turfing and fencing works were initiated by the National Development Unit \n(NDU) in 2022 but remained incomplete. The football ground has not yet been handed over to \nthe Council. The proposed lighting project also estimated at Rs4 million has been listed under the \nproposed amenities project for Financial Year 2025-2026, subject to availability of funds. \nSimilarly, the Grand Sable football ground, in existence for over 30 years and covering an \narea of 6,000 m2, remains without lighting to date. In 2015, the Ministry of Local Government \nallocated Rs138,000 for the removal of damaged fencing but no follow-up project was \nimplemented. Although the NDU had proposed boundary wall upgrading since 2014, actual \ninclusion in the programme occurred only in the year 2016-2017. Again, the lighting project \nproposed in the year 2025-2026 budget is estimated at Rs4 million. \nMadam Speaker, with respect to the Bambous Virieux football ground which has been in \nexistence for over 40 years, I am informed that the lanterns were previously installed by rooting \nelectrical cables through PVC pipes and affixing them directly on the fencing poles.  \n\n88 \n \n \nI am informed that the lanterns were previously installed by routing electrical cables \nthrough PVC pipes and affixing them directly on the fencing poles. However, all lighting \nfacilities collapsed during the passage of cyclone Batsirai in 2022, and to date, no remedial \naction has been undertaken by the District Council of Grand Port.  \nThe size of the plot is approximately 8,900 m2 and the cost for new lighting works has \nsimilarly been proposed at Rs4 million in the 2025-2026 Budget.  \nI wish to inform the House that my Ministry will formally write to the National \nDevelopment Unit to request that the implementation of lighting facilities at Rivière des Créoles \nand Bois des Amourettes be treated as a matter of priority under the proposed amenities projects, \nsubject to budget availability. Additionally, the implementation of lighting works at Bambous \nVirieux and Grand Sable will be considered under a suitable Vote Item by my Ministry in the \nforthcoming budget planning. \nMadam Speaker, at a meeting held on 15 July 2025, I directed all Chief Executives of the \nlocal authorities to ensure that all public infrastructures and assets are regularly inspected and \nproperly maintained. It is their statutory duty to carry out regular inspections and take \nappropriate actions where deficiencies are found. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Everybody is happy? Good!  \nI have less than 10 minutes left.  \nSo, now, I am calling the hon. First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart! \nPSAC MODULAR EXAMINATIONS – GRADE 5 PUPILS – ELIGIBILITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/765",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 765,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/765) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked the \nMinister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the recent changes to the \nPrimary School Achievement Certificate (PSAC) Modular Examinations in Grade 5, he will state \nif the pupils presently enrolled in Grade 5 are eligible to sit for the PSAC Examinations or will \nbe shifted to the previous elite system.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, as from this year, there will be no modular \nassessments for pupils of Grade 5.  \n\n89 \n \n \nIn line with the annual programme for the PSAC Assessment 2025, students who are in \nGrade 5 and have completed five years of schooling, inclusive of Grades 1 to 5, and who are \nattending government-aided or registered primary schools may exceptionally sit for the PSAC \nassessment in 2025 subject to request made by their parents.  \nHowever, those students who are currently in Grade 5 and have benefitted from an \naccelerated promotion from Grade 1 to Grade 2 in Academic Year 2021/2022 due to the \nCOVID-19 will not be eligible to take part in the PSAC assessment this year as they would not \nhave completed the five years of schooling. They will sit for PSAC assessment in Academic \nYear 2026. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to the last part of the question, related to an elite system, I \nwish to inform the House that all leading nations have their own models of selection of their very \nbest students from within their schooling system.  \nI wish to inform the House that we should not vilify elitism as long as it is not at the \nexpense of the well-being of our students. We need to nurture excellence, support highflyers, \ngive them proper academic support, but at the same time, we should never forsake or neglect the \nwellbeing of those students who have learning difficulties or learning disabilities.  \nI assure the House that this Government will be fair and equitable to all our students. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nWe cannot have another question. Time is up! \nThere are three questions which have been withdrawn: PQs B/728, B/766 and B/767. \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that all the business on \ntoday’s Order Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10. \nMr Bhagwan rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \n\n90 \n \n \nPUBLIC BILL \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Criminal Appeal and Criminal Review Bill (No. XVII \nof 2025) was read a first time. \nSecond Reading \nTHE CRIMINAL APPEAL AND CRIMINAL REVIEW BILL  \n(NO. XVII OF 2025) \nOrder for Second Reading read. \n(3.55 p.m.) \nThe Attorney General (Mr G. P. C. Glover, SC): Madam Speaker, I move that the \nCriminal Appeal and Criminal Review Bill (No. XVII of 2025) be read a second time. \nMadam Speaker, this Bill may appear, at first glance, to be rather technical in nature. But it \nspeaks, in fact, to something fundamental: the right to a fair trial and, more specifically, the right \nto a meaningful appeal.  \nIt reflects this Government’s commitment to ensure that our judicial system is further \nprotected and improved. It is our goal to ensure that the delivery of justice in our Courts becomes \nmore coherent, accessible and fair. \nMadam Speaker, let me begin by outlining the broad aims of this Bill. At present, process \ngoverning appeals in criminal matters is fragmented and inconsistent. Procedures are scattered \nacross the Criminal Appeal Act and its Rules, the Courts Act, and the District and Intermediate \nCourts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act.  \nThis has led to confusion for litigants, unnecessary procedural points being raised and \nargued, leading to delays in the administration of justice. \nThis Government’s promise to make justice more accessible includes making it easier for \nlaypersons to understand the law. True it is, we abide by the maxim that «nul n’est censé ignorer \nla loi.»  This makes sense. We abide by the maxim because you cannot have someone asking to \nbe exonerated from a legal obligation simply because it is argued that he or she did not know \nwhat the law said. It is a basic principle of the rule of law.  \n\n91 \n \n \nBut we cannot be blind to the fact that, in this day and age, the combined volume of all \napplicable Acts of Parliament in a country like Mauritius is simply enormous. Even the most \nseasoned law practitioner cannot claim to know all of our laws. So, the question arises: how can \nwe be fair to our citizens? \nThe least we can do, Madam Speaker, is to make it easier for people to get access to the \nlaw, that is, dans le concret and physically. This is why my Office is launching in the coming \nweeks a website where all the updated statutes in force in Mauritius will be freely available, \nwithout complex sign-in procedures and without uncertainties about past versions and \namendments. The Regulations will be uploaded shortly after, given the sheer number of \nregulations which, we must admit, evolve continuously. \n The next step, and which I readily admit is less straightforward, is to make our laws easier \nto understand. There are times when this will not be possible, because of situations where legal \ndrafting simply needs the technical language that allows precision and finality.  \nBut there are, on the other hand, many instances where we can be clearer. Where \nprocedures are complex simply because of historical weight, rooted in reasons which are no \nlonger relevant. In such situations, we must endeavour to make things simpler and more \nstraightforward. \nThe Bill before the House, today, Madam Speaker, aims to start this process for criminal \nlaw. It does so by consolidating all criminal appeal and review procedures under a single \nlegislative framework. It simplifies the steps required to lodge and prosecute appeals; and it \nensures uniformity of treatment, whether the appeal arises from the Supreme Court sitting in \noriginal jurisdiction or from subordinate courts. \nWe are also introducing changes that will substantially improve the fairness of treatment of \naccused persons. For example, henceforth, there cannot be more than 28 days between the \nmoment a person is found guilty of an offence and the delivery of his sentence by the court. We \ndo not often realise, Madam Speaker, that there are today dozens and dozens of individuals who \nwait for months, and may I even dare to say, years in prison before learning about their sentence! \nWith the risk that they could end up spending more time inside than what justice has decided or \nwill decide for them. This is an intolerable situation which must be done away with forthwith. \n\n92 \n \n \nSo, Madam Speaker, this Bill may look to be simply a technical reform, but its effect will \nbe felt. The more so when combined with all the other aspects of judicial reform which we intend \nto tackle; which is what we have promised in the Government Programme 2025-2029, that is to \nreinforce public trust in the justice system. \nMadam Speaker, allow me now to guide the House through the main elements of the Bill. \nPart I deals with preliminary matters. Clause 3 imposes an important new obligation: all courts \nmust now notify a convicted person of their right to appeal immediately after delivering \njudgement. It seems obvious, but this step is not currently mandatory. And its absence has, at \ntimes, led to injustice.  \nOften when someone is not represented at first instance by a lawyer, by the time – \n1) \nthat he processes the fact that he has been found guilty, he starts telling people \naround him about his conviction and why he disagrees with it; \n2) \nthat he eventually learns that he can appeal and how he is to do that; \n3) \nthat he travels to Port Louis to try and meet counsel; \n4) \nwhere he will be told that he has got to get a copy of the judgement from the Court in \norder for counsel to be able to advise him, and \n5) \nthen for counsel to draw up the grounds of appeal, not after having had to pay a fee \nto the registry of the court to obtain such a judgement, and \n6) \nfinally he needs to see an Attorney to actually lodge the notice of appeal,the 21-day \nlimit for appeals has, more often than not, already passed. We simply must make this \nprocess easier and we start here by making sure he knows from day one that he can \nappeal.  \nPart II of this Bill covers appeals and reviews before the Court of Criminal Appeal. Clauses \n4 and 5 establish its composition and jurisdiction. Here, I should point out that the creation of a \nseparate Court of Appeal in terms of composition and location is a reform that we are still \nworking on, as set out in the Government Programme. I stress that this new Bill will work \nseamlessly whether in the new system to be proposed or in the current situation where the Court \nof Criminal Appeal is composed of judges of our Supreme Court, where it also sits.  \n\n93 \n \n \nAnother important note here is that clause 5(2) maintains that even acquittals following a \njury verdict may be appealed by the DPP but only in limited circumstances: where, for example: \nthe verdict is unreasonable, or a serious irregularity has tainted the trial.  \nClause 6 harmonises and clarifies the procedure to appeal. The rule is now simple: whether \nthe appellant challenges conviction, sentence or both, the deadline is 21 days from sentence. This \nreplaces the outdated two-stage system before the Assizes, where an accused party had to appeal \nagainst his conviction within ten days of conviction, and then await his sentence to challenge it: a \nsource of confusion for lawyers and absurdity for all. This anachronism had to go too.  \nClause 9 introduces a clearer, better-defined route for criminal reviews. The DPP may \napply to the Court of Criminal Appeal for a review of an acquittal or dismissal where fresh and \ncompelling evidence has come to life.  \nA convicted person may similarly request a review, but here it is via the Human Rights \nDivision of the National Human Rights Commission, on the same grounds. That is fresh and \ncompelling evidence. This is a safeguard, not a second bite at the cherry. It is not a political tool, \nnor an appeal in disguise. But where evidence surfaces that is both new and probative, justice \ndemands a mechanism for correction. Clause 9 provides for it. The role given now exclusively to \nthe Human Rights Division reflects the fact that one cannot expect a convicted person in prison \nto go and obtain statements from witnesses or other forms of fresh evidence all by himself, he \nwill therefore have the help of the National Human Rights Commission through its Human \nRights Division. \nPart III mirrors the process of the Court of Criminal Appeal for appeals from subordinate \ncourts to the Supreme Court in its appellate jurisdiction. Clauses 10 to 14 provide for \ncomposition, powers, procedures and rules for such appeals. The goal, again, is uniformity. An \nimportant addition is the provision for a third judge to be appointed, should the two judges \nhaving heard the appeal, have opposing views on the outcome. This will ensure the avoidance of \ndeadlocks which too often these days just result in the decision being delayed until one side \nwears out. \nPart IV addresses interim matters pending appeal: stay of proceedings, restitution of \nproperty, bail, custody of exhibits. Of note, however is Clause 19 which rationalises timelines for \nskeleton arguments: 30 days before hearing for appellants, 15 days for respondents, as opposed \n\n94 \n \n \nto 45 and 30 days respectively now as the law stands. The new timeframe is more realistic than \nthe current regime which is in fact rarely complied with and it will improve preparedness and \njudicial efficiency. \nPart V lays out the determination of appeals and reviews. Clauses 20 to 33 set out the \npowers of the Appellate Court, including the power to substitute verdicts, order retrials, amend \nsentences, or correct serious irregularities. Clause 34 deals with outcomes of criminal reviews: \nthe Court of Criminal Appeal may quash an acquittal or conviction and order a retrial if it is \nsatisfied that justice so requires and that a fair retrial is still possible. \nClause 35 mandates credit for time spent in custody pending appeal or review, subject to \nspecific rules. This codifies a principle already recognised in practice and jurisprudence. \nPart VI includes miscellaneous provisions. Clause 36 allows for extensions of time on \napplications made. Clause 37 enables the Chief Justice to grant legal aid even where no formal \napplication is made, a small but important protection for unrepresented litigants. Clause 38 \naffirms the role of the DPP in representing the State in appeals and reviews. \nClause 39, Madam Speaker, regulates ancillary matters like costs, clause 40 empowers the \nChief Justice to make rules for implementation. Clause 41 repeals the Criminal Appeal Act and \nthe Criminal Appeal Rules of 1954, and clause 42 introduces necessary amendments to five \nstatutes, including the Children’s Court Act 2020, the Courts Act, and the Protection of Human \nRights Act. \nMadam Speaker, what this Bill offers is not innovation for innovation’s sake. It is a \ncodification of best practice, along with rationalisation; and here I should stress that it is the fruit \nof careful consultation with the Judiciary. This is the kind of legislative work that can make our \nsystem function more smoothly, more fairly, and with greater certainty. \nMore such work will follow from my Office, driven by the impetus of this Government.  \nMadam Speaker, before concluding, may I take this opportunity to say this: we have not \nincluded in this Bill mandatory time limits for judgements to be handed down by the Courts, but \nwe are strongly considering this reform as well in the not-too-distant future, in a separate and \ncomprehensive piece of legislation. We have already started consultations on this issue, and we \nwill discuss more, particularly with the Judiciary. We will respect the views of all stakeholders \n\n95 \n \n \nand the constraints faced by them.  But the time to make it happen will come, and we will not \nwaver. \nJustice, Madam Speaker, cannot be achieved if the path to appeal is so entangled in \nprocedural thicket that only the most sophisticated or well-represented litigants can find their \nway through. This Bill is part of our duty, as legislators, to prune those thorns and light that path. \nThis Bill may not enthuse or incite great debate. But it is an important one nonetheless.  \nI commend the Bill to the House. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nYes, hon. A. Duval! \n(4.09 p.m.) \nMr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne Longue): Thank you, \nMadam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker, I would have liked to rise from the Opposition benches to fulfil our \nconstitutional duty of rigorous oversight but that is simply impossible, given the indecent rush in \nwhich this Bill has been thrust upon the House. \nThe Government has invoked Standing Order 65 (Urgent Bills) procedure granting barely \n3 days’ notice and scheduling First, Second and Third Readings for today, even though, as you \nknow, Standing Order 52 (2) a long-standing norm, not the exception, requires 15 days’ notice at \nleast, being given to Members of Parliament, and of course, to civil society at large.  \nAnd the statistics are stark, Madam Speaker. Out of the 19 Bills introduced in this session, \n17 bear a Prime Ministerial Certificate of Urgency, eight of those including this Bill, have \narrived with only three days’ notice. Such a haste, Madam Speaker, denies the members of \nParliament the time required to properly scrutinise the legislation that will overhaul our entire \ncriminal appellate framework.  \nWorst, in fact, is the fact that there are only two of us here sitting in the Opposition, and we \nare now to shoulder that burden. In fact, you will note, two Members of the Opposition, the \nfewest since our Independence.  \n\n96 \n \n \n(Interruptions) \nWhat is more, Madam Speaker, is that many on government side once condemned \nprecisely this practice. The Deputy Prime Minister, without a portfolio, the hon. Paul Bérenger, \nwhen he sat…  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Is he raising a point of order, Madam Speaker? What is he \ntalking about? \nMadam Speaker: Will you sit down? Let him…  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Is he raising a point of order? He is not speaking on the Bill \nat all.  \nMr Bhagwan: Koz lor Bill la ta! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: You have given him the privilege of speaking in the second \nplace; in the place of the Leader of the Opposition, who is not even present! And you give him \nground to say anything like that, out of order!  \nMadam Speaker: No. Alright. Please talk on the Bill. We have got your first objection. \nPlease speak on the Bill. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, can’t I now not even lay some ground foundation to the \nspeech? \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Pe koz nirport. Al dormi!  \nMr A. Duval: I was saying the manner this Bill, you like it or not, has been brought to the \nHouse under Standing Order 65. I am talking about the manner in which this Bill is being \nbrought. And this was once said… \nMr Mohamed: On a point of order! \nMadam Speaker: Yes! Yes! \nMr Mohamed: If the hon. Member wants to take a point of order, he is …  \nMr A. Duval: I am not! \nMr Mohamed: Don’t interrupt me! \n\n97 \n \n \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: He does not even know what it is! \nMr Mohamed: Don’t interrupt me! Learn from what I’ll say. Now, what I am trying to say \nis… \nMs Anquetil: Bravo! \nMr Mohamed: If he wants to…. \nDr. Boolell: Baba! \nMr Mohamed: … come up with a point of order, he is free to do so.  \nMadam Speaker: And I will give a ruling.  \nMr Mohamed: Obviously. But then, again, if he is trying to use the backdoors, since he is \nused to using backdoors and he takes pleasure from using backdoors, if he wants to do so… \nMadam Speaker: Make your point of order! \nMr Mohamed: … by going to come and to talk about a point of order, instead of going \nfrom a main subject of a debate…  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: And insulting people!  \nMr Mohamed: … that is against Standing Orders. It is very simple. He is not being \nrelevant. Now, the manner in which the Bill has come can be the subject matter of a point of \norder. The Leader of the Opposition could have seen you this morning; he could have delegated \nsomeone to see you. They did not bother to do so.  \nNow if they haven’t bothered to do so, and they are right after the fact, we are not going to \nbe listening here, wasting our time, and not even him talking about the debate!  \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, … \nMr Mohamed: For God’s sake! \nMr A. Duval: …this is not a point of order.  \nMadam Speaker: You have to speak about the Bill.  \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, … \nMs Anquetil: Sit down! \n\n98 \n \n \nMadam Speaker: Don’t forget that I have been … \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Ki ou p exciter … \nMadam Speaker: Don’t forget that I have been 15 years in this Assembly. I am used to \nwhat you are saying.  \nMr A. Duval: But, Madam Speaker, … \nMadam Speaker: But you have to speak about the Bill.  \n(Interruptions) \nYou have to speak about the Bill.  \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: This very document has been laid on the Table of the Assembly. What does \nit say? \n“Certificate of Urgency in respect of The Criminal Appeal and Criminal Review Bill (No. \nXVII of 2025)” \nThis Bill...  \n(Interruptions) \nMs J. Bérenger: Li pan ecoute Speaker! \nMr A. Duval: So, Madam Speaker, since when can I not talk about the manner in which a \nBill is brought to the House? It is entirely relevant. \n(Interruptions) \nEntirely relevant! \nMr Mohamed: On a right point of order! \nMr A. Duval: And it was being said… \nIt is not a point of order! Under which Standing Order? \nMr Mohamed: It is! \nMr A. Duval : Non! Non! Non! \n\n99 \n \n \nMr Mohamed: You were bothered … \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: Do not try to intimidate me! I will do my speech! \nMr Mohamed: Ayo! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, …  \nMr Mohamed: By being irrelevant! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: If the Speaker allows you! \nMr A. Duval: She will! \nMadam Speaker: You have to speak about the Bill, … \nMr A. Duval: I am. \nMadam Speaker: ... otherwise, I will suspend the Sitting! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, …  \nMr Mohamed: They didn’t have time to cut, edit and paste … \nMr A. Duval: It was once said in the House that First, Second and Third Readings being \nbrought … \nMr Mohamed: Stop reading! \nMr A. Duval: … is not acceptable! \nMr Mohamed: Stop reading! \nMr A. Duval: And that is not how good parliamentary work was done. \nMadam Speaker: Standing Orders allow Certificates of Urgency… \nMr A. Duval: Yes! I am talking about that precisely.  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: You should sit down! \nMr A. Duval: I am not raising a Point of order, I am merely explaining how this Bill is \nbeing brought into the House! \nMr Mohamed: That’s not the debate! \n\n100 \n \n \nAn hon. Member: Talk on the Bill! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: It is! It is about the Bill! \nMadam Speaker, ….  \nMadam Speaker: Now come on the Bill itself! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, it sounds fishy, to say the least.  \nMadam Speaker: Now, come on the Bill itself! \nMr A. Duval: In fact, this government …  \n(Interruptions) \nI have said what I had to say…  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Ki li pe koze! \nMr A. Duval: I will say more outside if I am being precluded … \nMadam Speaker: Yes, go outside! \nMr A. Duval: … from saying it inside! \nMadam Speaker: Yes, go outside! \nMr A. Duval: Now, expert voices, Madam Speaker, have likewise been excluded. The \nLaw Reform Commission, the Mauritius Bar Council, the Mauritius Law Society, have not been \nconsulted nor have they had the courtesy of being sent a copy of this legislation, of this Bill.  \nAnd that is very important.  \nAnd, therefore, there has been no meaningful opportunity for them to offer their expertise \nand pronounce on the Bill.  \nBy compressing the debate, like I said, it is not the first time – the exception has become \nthe rule – by compressing this debate into a three-day sprint, the government has deprived \nParliament of the independent insight needed to grasp serious constitutional and procedural \nchanges which are at stake.  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Going on and on like that… \n\n101 \n \n \nMr A. Duval: I will call it legislative ambush. The Bill, Madam Speaker, …  \nMadam Speaker: Now, come to the Bill.  \nMr A. Duval: Yes, it is all about the Bill.  \nMs J. Bérenger: Oune les li fer tousala. \nAn hon. Member: Five minutes left! \nMr A. Duval: It is all about the Bill, whether I bring it without consultation, the manner of \nbringing the Bill is all about the Bill. I am not talking about making political arguments here. I \nam talking about the respect that we have shown to this House.  \nMs Anquetil: Ayo! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Manman! \nMr A. Duval: One of the cornerstones, and I will say, Madam Speaker, … \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Then, it’s like the Attorney General! \nMr A. Duval: … and that proves the point I have to say about the Bill. In fact, I don’t have \nthat much to say about the Bill because we have been given so little time. \nMadam Speaker: Oh, you have nothing to say! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: Three days! One of the cornerstones of our legal system … \nMs J. Bérenger: Enn la honte ! \nMr A. Duval: … and especially … \nMadam Speaker:  Hon. Mr A. Duval, please sit down!  \nMr A. Duval: I am talking about the various provisions, … \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: No, you are not! You are not. We will have to make a decision here. \nYou have a Bill. As I said, I have been here for 15 years; we have had several Bills like this, \nwhich come on one day for the next day. \n\n102 \n \n \nIf you cannot talk about the Bill, you have made your point about why you cannot, then we \nwill stop here. Somebody else will speak.  \nI have read the Bill. I have also got it at the last minute. I am also a lawyer like you. Now, \neither you can speak about the substance of the Bill or if you feel that you have not been given \ntime, then you give up. \nYou’ve made your point already.  \nMr A. Duval: That will be, I think, what many here would have wanted. But I will speak \nabout the Bill. \nOne of the cornerstones of our legal system, especially of criminal legislation, is the \nprinciple, Madam Speaker, of legal certainty, that is, that the need for the legislature to be \nabundantly clear in the drafting of the law to avoid any ambiguity or confusion in the \ninterpretation of law by the Court.  \nThis Bill, in my opinion, will affect one of the most fundamental rights of the citizens –the \nright of appeal in its lack of clarity in certain aspects.  \nHon. Members: What! \nMr A. Duval: I will explain. I find this even more worrying that important rights and \nprinciples which are beneficial to accused parties under the current legislation, are being done \naway with.  \nLet me come to the specific provisions, under section 11 (2) (a), the right of appeal shall \nnow lie where one – \n“[…]is sentenced to undergo penal servitude or imprisonment with or without payment of a \nfine, or to pay a fine of 1,000 rupees or more.” \nTherefore, as it is presently, when the fine is less than a thousand, you do not have the right of \nappeal but penal servitude, imprisonment and fines are not the only existing sentences which the \nCourt can impose. What about suspended sentences and community service orders under the \nCommunity Service Order Act? What about conditional and absolute discharge under the \nCriminal Procedure Act? And this, I believe is for the legislator to clarify.  \n(Interruptions) \n\n103 \n \n \nAn hon. Member: Suspend the Sitting! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: Are these now also going to fall under Section 11 (2)(a)? It is for – I hope – \nthe Attorney General to explain. \nMr Mohamed: Ayo baap! Ki pou explain? \nMr A. Duval: It appears, therefore, Madam Speaker, that those people shall be deprived of \nthe right to appeal. In any case, the object of the Bill was to clarify. \nMr Mohamed: Kouyon ho gal ba! \nMr A. Duval: And it has not done so. \nUnder Section 22, a citizen shall henceforth be deprived of his right of appeal against a \njudgment where there is a variance between the information and the evidence, unless he has \nraised the point before the trial court. \n But the reality, Madam Speaker, is that in many cases, accused parties are simply not \nrepresented by counsel at trial stage, whether it is for lack of financial resources or for whatever \nreasons. But this is the reality. Of course, those persons cannot be expected to take objections in \nlaw in the course of their trial. \nSo, this section will essentially deprive those persons of the protection against \nimproprieties in their trial. Yet, this protection under the current law exists.  \nI would like to quote Liew vs the State of Mauritius 2021 Supreme Court case. The \naccused was not represented at trial and found guilty. The appellant jurisdiction of the Supreme \nCourt quashed the conviction precisely on the ground that there was variance between the \ninformation and the evidence, which point – you will no doubt understand –was raised only at \nappeal stage. \nI hope that the Attorney General can clarify whether now it will be the case for those \npersons who were Inops consilii and could not, therefore, raise that point in law.  \nSection 9 and Section 34, Madam Speaker, put une épée de Damoclès on citizens by giving \nthe right to the Director of Public Prosecutions to apply for review of sound appeal judgment and \n\n104 \n \n \nto have a retrial of the case which was properly tried, where there is evidence accordingly that \ncomes to light. This is contrary to the very well settled principle of autrefois acquis… \nMadam Speaker: Keep an eye on the time! \nMr A. Duval: …and certainty… \nMr Lobine: Jamais! \nMr A. Duval: …which guarantee that once a person has been acquitted… \nMr Lobine: Jamais! \nMr A. Duval: …he should be protected from subsequent prosecution for the same facts.  \nMoreover, Madam Speaker, it appears that there is no time limit under the Act for the DPP \nto apply for the said review. This will result in acquitted individuals to suffer lifelong stress and \nanxiety of having their case reopened precisely because of the lack of certainty. \nOf course, there are positives provisions in this Bill. The fact that the court must inform \nevery convicted person of their right to appeal. The fact that now there is a clear set of days \nbetween the time the conviction is handed and the sentence must be handed – of 28 days. There \nis also time spent in custody shall automatically be credited against the final sentence.  \nMadam Speaker, I will conclude with these remarks. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Chut! Yes! \nMr A. Duval: More meaningful debate, in my opinion, can take place when we do not \nsideline the very stakeholders whose expertise is indispensable. The Law Reform Commission, \nthe Mauritius Bar Council, the Mauritius Law Society are but a few of those who would have \nhad, had they been given proper notice, something to say about this Bill. \nI will quote the Deputy Prime Minister, again, who said at the time – \n« Allons tirer une leçon de tout cela [Saying about the First, Second and Third Reading \nbeing brought on the same day.] à l’avenir, pour les autres projets de loi, selon lesquels il \nfaudrait, dès qu’ils sont prêts, les circuler pour qu’on puisse avoir amplement le temps de \nles considérer à tête reposée. »  \n\n105 \n \n \nWell, perhaps, Madam Speaker, it is indeed time for some of us to go and se reposer à la \nmaison!  \nMadam Speaker: That was very, very bad! Very, very nasty! \nMs J. Bérenger: Cheap! \nMadam Speaker: Very nasty! \nMs J. Bérenger: Cheap! \nMadam Speaker: Shall we break so that we can all rest? Or do you want one more \nspeech? One more speech? \nHon. Members: One more! One more! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Pa donn li lokazion pou sove, li al dan so… \nMadam Speaker: Okay, one more speech then! I wanted to break at five. Alright, let us \nhave hon. Seeburn, please! \n(4.25 p.m.) \nMr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle): Thank you, \nMadam Speaker. Madam Speaker, I rise in support of the proposed Criminal Appeal and \nCriminal Review Bill, which is a reaffirmation of our rule of law.  \nThe Bill comes with a view to bring clarity and certainty in this area of the law so as to \nsimplify the procedures in a deliberate and thoughtful consolidated legislation for appeal and \nreview cases across all levels of our judiciary. \nMadam Speaker, unfortunately, the hon. Member of the Opposition stated that this Bill has \nbeen brought in only a few days. This is not correct as there was already an indication in the \nannouncement of our Government Programme 2025-2029 that these legislations are in the \npipeline.  \nMadam Speaker, under the current system, the criminal appeals and criminal review cases \nare governed by a scattered set of statutes, case law and procedural rules.  \nThe courts are operating under different routes of appeal, under different legislations which \nhas left the people, especially the vulnerable ones who wish to challenge a conviction or sentence \n\n106 \n \n \noften confused. This lack of uniformity risks undermining the very principles upon which our \njustice system is built, including fairness, accessibility and equal treatment under the law.  \nThis Bill is a transformative step forward of how justice is administered in our country. \nMadam Speaker, as the hon. Attorney General, at the very outset of his speech for this Bill, said \nthat this will promote fair trial. This Bill unifies the appeal rights of all appeal cases in criminal \nmatters that are made from the final decision of the Supreme Court and from the final decision of \nthe District Court, the Intermediate Court and the Children’s Court in a single and coherent \nlegislation. \nIn doing so, the Bill will strengthen legal certainty and protect the rights of all parties \ninvolved in criminal proceedings.  \nMadam Speaker, the Bill clearly imposes an obligation on any…. \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members: Ala li ale! Li ale! \nMr Lobine: To ti bizin ekoute, to ale! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Seeburn: Madam Speaker, the Bill clearly imposes an obligation on any court… \nMadam Speaker: Allow the hon. Member to speak! Allow the hon. Member to speak! \nCarry on, carry on. \nMr Seeburn: Madam Speaker, the Bill clearly imposes an obligation on any court to \nimmediately notify the convicted person of his right to appeal or the procedure to make an \napplication to review the proceedings of the Supreme Court before the Court of Criminal Appeal.  \nPart I of the Bill deals with the preliminary matters, including the short title, the \ninterpretation and the notification of the right to appeal.  \nPart II of the Bill outlines the composition, the jurisdiction and the powers of the Court of \nCriminal Appeal and further outlines the procedures, the proceedings and the notice required to \nresist the appeal before the Criminal Court of Appeal.  \n\n107 \n \n \nSection 10 of the Bill provides that an appeal before the Appellate Jurisdiction (Criminal) \nof the Supreme Court shall be heard by at least two judges and further provides that the Chief \nJustice may, upon receipt of an application, direct more than two judges to hear the appeal \nhaving regard to the magnitude of the case and the importance of the question of law, and the \nimportance of the question of facts involved. \nSection 11 of the Bill provides that the Supreme Court shall have unlimited jurisdiction and \npowers to hear and determine appeal by a person against his conviction or sentence or hear the \nappeal by the DPP against any dismissal of a charge or conviction or sentence imposed on a \nperson from the final decision of the subordinate court. \nMadam Speaker, Section 12 and Section 14 of the Bill deal with the procedure to appeal \nand the appeal proceedings before the Supreme Court. Section 13 provides that a party upon \nwhom a notice of appeal is served, that party may resist the appeal before the Supreme Court by \nfiling a notice of his intention to resist the appeal within a maximum period of 28 days. \nPart IV of the Bill deals with the matters pending before the Court of Criminal Appeal, as \nprovided under Section 15 and Section 16, with the stay of proceedings and the restitution of \nproperty pending trial.  \nSection 17 provides that where a person who has been convicted and sentenced gives \nnotice of appeal to the Court before which he is convicted and has been refused bail pending \nappeal, may apply to the Appellate jurisdiction of the Court to be admitted to bail pending the \ndetermination of his appeal. \nSections 18 and 19 of Bill deal with the custody of exhibits and documents and the filing of \nskeleton arguments and submissions pending the criminal appeal. \nMadam Speaker, sections 22 to 33 under PART V of the Bill deals with the determination \nof the general powers of the Appellate Court including issues relating miscarriage of justice, \ndefect in information, warrants and summons or omission and mistake, and further issues \nregarding evidence irregularity and lack of records in proper convictions and acquittal on \naccount of insanity, and also, deals with the bar to subsequent prosecution and dismissal of a \ncharge and other powers of the Supreme Court. \n\n108 \n \n \nSection 34 of the Bill provides specific general powers to the Court of Criminal Appeal on \nreview. To call fresh and compelling evidence that is likely to quash the acquittal or conviction \nor order that person to be retried for the offence with which he was originally charged. The hon. \nAttorney General rightly said earlier that this is not a political tool but rather a safeguard.  \nMadam Speaker, section 36 of the Bill provides that where a convicted person has not been \nnotified of his right to appeal, may have good cause to apply for an extension of time to the \nCourt of Criminal Appeal. \nSection 37 of the Bill emphasises on access to justice and empowers the Master and \nRegistrar to report to the Chief Justice where legal aid should be granted for the purpose of an \nappeal or review although no applications were made. \nSection 38 of the Bill provides that the DPP shall appear for the State on every appeal to \nthe Appellate Court unless it is a private prosecution and appear before the Court of Criminal \nAppeal on every application for review. Section 39 of the Bill goes on to say that no cost shall be \nallowed on either side on hearing any appeal or review by the Court of Criminal Appeal under \nthis Act. Section 40 of the Bill empowers the Chief Justice to make such rules as maybe \nnecessary for the purpose of this Act. Thus, upholding a fundamental principle of the rule of law. \nMadam Speaker, the Bill further intends to repeal the Criminal Appeal Act 1954 and \nrevokes the Criminal Appeal Rules as a specified in section 41 of the Bill. The Bill addresses a \nmajor void in this area of the law by imposing an obligation on any Court to pass sentence on a \nconvicted person within a maximum period of 28 days and not later. \nMadam Speaker, the Bill proposes to amend section 11 of the Children’s Court Act, under \nsection 42 where now, an appeal against an order or the final judgement of the magistrate of the \nCriminal Division of the Children’s Court will be made to the Supreme Court in accordance with \nthe Criminal Appeal and Criminal Review Bill. \nClause 42 of the Bill also proposes to repeal sections 69 and 70 of the Courts Act and \nprovide simplified provisions under this Bill to deal with criminal appeal cases. \nThe Bill further proposes under clause 42 to amend section 132 (a) of the Criminal \nProcedure Act which deals with hearing on sentence where now, after convicting an accused, the \nCourt having regard, gives an opportunity to the accused to adduce evidence in mitigation and \n\n109 \n \n \nafter hearing such other matters that is relevant to the facts and circumstances of the offence \nimpose the sentence on the accused within 14 days. \nMadam Speaker, the Bill brings further amendments to the criminal jurisdiction of the \nDistrict and Intermediate Court’s Act by repealing the entire provisions under Section 92 to \nSection 100 of the Act which has been a complex and confusing area of the law. This Bill has \nnow simplified the procedures for a person who has been charged with an offence for the \nprosecution, for the Court and for the legal professionals. As Jeremy Bentham, a great English \nphilosopher who continuously advocated for simplified legal system, says – \n“A law that is not clear is no law at all.” \nMadam Speaker, in fact, any person who cannot easily understand their rights to appeal or \nwhen the process to seek redress is unnecessarily complex or inconsistent, it is the integrity of \nour entire justice system that is called into question. As such complexity and inconsistent \noutcomes cause delays and uncertainty not only for the appellants but also for the victims and the \nlaw professionals, it is unacceptable that in matters of such gravity where the liberty and rights of \nindividuals are at stake and that our justice system would tolerate ambiguity in the process. \nMadam Speaker, the Bill ensures that once a final decision has been delivered by the \nSupreme Court, District Court, Intermediate Court or Children’s Court, the party will have a \nclearly defined legally consistent pathway for appeal or review which will ensure confidence and \nfairness against arbitrary outcomes. The Bill further reinforces the Constitutional rights of \nindividuals of section 10 of our Constitution which guarantees a fair trial. The Bill supports the \nindependence of the Judiciary by offering a clear and predictable framework for criminal appeal \ncases and further protects the most vulnerable ones. \nMadam Speaker, the Bill also reflects our international obligations under human rights \ninstruments to which Mauritius is a party including International Covenant on Civil and Political \nRights which affirms the right of every person convicted of a crime to have their conviction and \nsentence reviewed by a higher tribunal. Hence, clause 42 of the Bill ensures that the proposed \nCriminal Appeal and Criminal Review Act 2025 will continue to provide access to a convicted \nperson or his representative to make application to the Human Rights Division for enquiry to be \nconducted in cases where there is sufficient fresh and compelling evidence that will satisfy the \nrequirement to carry out investigation. \n\n110 \n \n \nMadam Speaker, the Judiciary as we know, is the cornerstone of our democratic society. \nBy simplifying the criminal appeal and review cases, we are reducing unnecessary delays; we are \nalleviating the burdens of our courts. We are ensuring that judicial time and resources are \nfocussed on the substance of justice. \nToday, this House is being asked not only to pass another legislation but rather to reshape \nthe very system of justice for our country. We are being asked to bring clarity in an area of law \nthat is complex and confusing for our system and for our people. We are being asked to ensure \nthat the pathway to justice is a clear road that is accessible to all regardless of status, regardless \nof age and regardless of means. \nMadam Speaker, before I conclude, I would like to thank the hon. Attorney General and \nthe State Law Office team for coming forward with this progressive piece of legislation that will \nreshape the criminal appeal and review cases, thus increasing public confidence in our \ninstitution. \nI therefore, urge all the party members to come together to give full support for this Bill as \ncustodians of justice and delivery a framework that will serve the law and the people it is \ndesigned to protect. We are sending a strong message to the people of Mauritius that we believe \nin a justice system that is transparent, fair and equal for all. Thus, upholding a fundamental \nprinciple of the law, as one says – \n“Justice must not only be done but it must be seen to be done for everyone”, \nand the Bill aims to achieve that. \nMadam Speaker, with these words, I commend the Bill to the House. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, I think we have time for you, hon. Lobine! \n(4.39 p.m.) \n Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix): Thank you Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker, first of all I am just flabbergasted by this despicable performance by the \nhon. Member from the Opposition side. Completely out of subject, he could not understand what \nthe particular clauses of this Bill is all about and the more so, he is just cut off from the reality, \nfrom the debates. Debates with regard to criminal appeal and criminal review date way back in \n\n111 \n \n \n2012. He is talking about the Law Reform Commission, way back when the then Guy Ollivry, \nQueen’s Counsel, was the Chairman of the Law Reform Commission. They have already worked \non it because they got it from a Green Paper that was presented by the then Labour Government \nwhen Lord Mackay of Clashfern made a comprehensive report as to how we have to move on to \nreform the Judiciary. \nSo, he is completely cut off from debates, from reality and it is not with the Certificate of \nUrgency that debates have started on this particular Bill with regard to review and also with \nregard to access to justice. \nMr Lobine: And what surprises me, Madam Speaker, is that lack of decorum, lack of \nelegance from the Member but what can we expect from somebody who came through the \nbackdoor and entered the previous Government? Madam Speaker, he became Speaker through \nthe backdoor. \nFor the past ten years, the previous Government got all these reports already worked in \ntheir drawers. They could not do a single reform with regard to judiciary or the judicial system \nand since January 2025, it is this Government which is bringing reforms, under the abled \ncapacity of the Attorney General who is rising above politics with regard to all these \namendments. These amendments have nothing to do with petty politics. This is access to justice. \nHe could not understand and due lack of decorum, he is not even here to listen to the debates. \nThis is a lack of courtesy; lack of manners and I am very sad that this hon. Member is a lawyer. \nEither he understands the Bill or he pretends not to understand what the Bill is all about, but if he \ndoes not understand that, then there is a problem with regard to his capacity as a lawyer, as a \nbarrister because we have to rise above party politics with regard to this particular Bill, Madam \nSpeaker. And I am also… \nMadam Speaker: Speak on the Bill now! \nMr Lobine: Yes.  \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker, after the Legal Aid and Legal Assistance Bill that was enacted, which is \nnow an Act, this is another piece of legislation that is another milestone to render justice more \naccessible to our people. And the Criminal Appeal and Criminal Review Bill is a timely and \n\n112 \n \n \nessential piece of legislation aimed at reforming and unifying appellant procedures in criminal \nmatters. The hon. Attorney General rightly put it, this Bill replaces a fragmented and inconsistent \nlegal framework with a single coherent system designed to ensure fairness, legal certainty and \naccess to justice. This is a clear signal as to the commitment of this Government to come with \ninstitutional reforms, be it, through the judiciary responsiveness to longstanding challenges and \ndelivery of justice as a public good.  \nThe way appeals are being done under this current system, Madam Speaker, the appeal \nprocedures are dispersed across outdated and inconsistent enactments. The Attorney General \npointed out the Criminal Appeal Act, the Criminal Appeal Rules 1954 and the Court Act, the \nDistrict and Intermediate Courts Criminal Jurisdiction Act, the Criminal Procedure Act and the \nChildren’s Court Act 2020. This scattering of rules has created uncertainty, procedural \ninefficiency and at times impeded on the administration of justice. This Bill brings a sort of \nconsolidation of what we, law practitioners and the public at large, desire. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to the work of law practitioners, it is indeed something that \nwill render justice and also deliver justice and give advice to clients more efficiently because first \nand foremost at clause 42(3), this Bill introduces a statutory deadline by amending section 132A \nof the Criminal Procedure Act. Madam Speaker, the Court now must impose sentence within 14 \ndays of conviction. This fills a longstanding gap in our criminal process. Previously, there was no \nstatutory framework for sentencing past convictions leading to prolonged uncertainty and delay \nin initiating appeals.  \nMadam Speaker, for the first time, this Bill introduces a uniform appellant process with \nstandardised timelines for filing notices, skeleton arguments and replies. The Bill includes \ndeadlines that will reduce abuse of adjournments and promote discipline among both parties in \nthe Courts. And timely access to records, Madam Speaker, with the clear timelines being \nprovided, now it is also upon the Court Registry to furnish, complete appeal records within a \nfixed time because it is clearly elaborated in this particular legislation that there are timelines to \nbe respected. So, it will facilitate jobs of the legal professionals but also, the public at large, \nMadam Speaker.    \nMadam Speaker, clause 3 of this Bill – the statutory duty to notify right of appeal – this is \nsomething – for the first time again – very innovative approach in our law. Every subordinate \n\n113 \n \n \nCourt will be required now, Madam Speaker, to notify a convicted person of their right to appeal. \nThis is a transformative procedural safeguard and we are not far from other countries that are \nembarking on such reforms with regard to criminal procedure. In India, for example, they are \ntrying to amend the Code of Criminal Procedure in the same manner that we are proceeding. In \nthe UK, they are also debating in their 2025 Law Reform with regard to procedures, with regard \nto criminal appeal. \nSo, Madam Speaker, another milestone is clause 9 – review of convictions and acquittals. \nClause 9 introduces a long-needed mechanism for the review of criminal cases after finality. \nUntil now, Mauritius had no statutory provision, allowing for the reopening of cases where new \nand compelling evidence emerges. The only recourse was presidential pardon. This Bill \nintroduces a robust, judicially supervised review process. Post-conviction reviews may be \ninitiated by the accused. Post-acquittal reviews may be brought by the DPP if the acquittal is \ntainted.  \nMadam Speaker, this aligns our country with Article 4(2) of Protocol 7 of the European \nConvention on the Human Rights which permits the reopening of criminal proceedings if there is \nnew or newly discovered evidence or if there has been fundamental defect in the proceedings and \nthis is what the Law Reform Commission said in 2012 with regard to miscarriage of justice, \nfollowing acquittals or convictions.  \nAnother milestone of this Bill, Madam Speaker, a couple of weeks back, we spoke with \nregard to legal aid. Here, in clause 37, Madam Speaker – legal aid without application. One of \nthe most commendable features is this clause 37, Madam Speaker, empowering the Master and \nRegistrar to refer deserving cases for legal aid to the Chief Justice, even if no application has \nbeen made. This provision realises the opinion given by the Law Reform Commission with \nregard to the paper on legal aid reform that complements the Legal Aid and Legal Assistance Bill \n2025 which was very recently debated and unfortunately again, hon. Adrien Duval, was not \npresent when we were debating about it. He pointed out to legal aid. This is already in our law \nnow. \nMadam Speaker, we must realise that with all those amendments, we are complying with \nwhat the UN Committee Against Torture, in its concluding observation made in April 2025 \nfollowing the consideration of the 5th periodic report, that is, we are consolidating our criminal \n\n114 \n \n \njustice system. This Bill responds directly to those recommendations by addressing procedural \ngaps and enhancing appeal and review rights.  \nAnd, Madam Speaker, I will not go into the comparative studies that are being conducted \nthroughout the world. New Zealand is doing it through the streamlining of their criminal \nprocedures, the UK through the 2025 Law Reform Commission Review recommending \nwidening of access to criminal review. In Canada, they are doing it following the famous case of \nR v Jordan. So, in that respect, Madam Speaker, Mauritius is not merely following. We are acting \nin solidarity with other democracies tackling the same systemic issues through principal reform. \nAnd to conclude, Madam Speaker, I would quote Lord Atkin. Lord Atkin said – \n“Finality is a good thing but justice is better.” \nThis is all about justice and I commend this Bill to the House. I thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. I think now we can take a break of 30 minutes. \nAt 4.49 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.30 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated! \nHon. Junior Minister, are you ready? Yes, please! \n(5.31 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade \n(Mr H. Narsinghen): Madame la présidente, je vous remercie de me donner la parole. \nI have been, in fact, expecting a lot from the Member of the Opposition. I expected him to \ncome with very valid points. In fact, dialectics should have called upon him to see what are the \nshortcomings in the Bill. But unfortunately, he chose another path.  \nWe should, in fact, commend the hon. Attorney General for the good work which is being \ndone. Within a very short span of time, he has come with a string of at least five legislations in \norder to consolidate democracy and human rights.  \n\n115 \n \n \nWhile commending him, at the same time, I would say that he is forcing me to confine \nmyself within pedagogy. So, it is good for me to explain, not to our seasoned barristers and \nlawyers in this House, but I am here more to speak to the common men and to explain to them. \nDonc, je ferais un petit plan, une petite introduction pour expliquer la base philosophique \nde cette nouvelle loi. En deuxième point, je parlerai le pourquoi de cette nouvelle loi. En \ntroisième point – \n• les failles de la loi actuelle et quelles seront les avancées et les apports de cette \nnouvelle loi ; \n• comment on va voir une consolidation des droits de l’accusé et l’appelant ; \n• comment on a intégré les standards internationaux ;  \n• comment on va respecter les droits humains encore plus;  \n• finalement, comment apporter un équilibre entre les droits de l’accusé et les droits \nde la société et ; \n• une petite conclusion. \nMadame la présidente, nous sommes réunis pour débattre d’un texte fondamental pour la \nconsolidation de notre État de droit. L’État de droit, il faut bien comprendre, Madame la \nprésidente, d’abord, c’est la primauté du droit et aussi, il faut qu’il y ait ce qu’on appelle l’égalité \ndevant la loi. Il faut aussi qu’il y ait ce qu’on appelle la sécurité juridique. Il faut une interdiction \nde l’arbitraire et aussi permettre un accès à la justice et respecter la séparation des pouvoirs. \nL’Attorney General a bien fait mention de ce concept fondamental qui existe dans notre \nConstitution, à travers l’article 10 de la Constitution, un concept très important, ce qu’on appelle \nle concept d’un procès équitable. Et quand on parle d’un procès, ce n’est pas seulement la \npremière partie de ce procès. Il faut aussi inclure l’appel. \nDonc, cette nouvelle loi, le Criminal Appeal and Criminal Review Bill, arrive à temps. Ce \ntexte marque une évolution décisive de notre système judiciaire pénal et s’inscrit dans une \nvolonté ferme de garantir un accès effectif à la justice et aussi de renforcer la transparence et de \nmoderniser les institutions. Et l’Attorney General a bien mentionné qu’il viendrait incessamment \navec une nouvelle loi pour qu’il y ait une autre cour d’appel.  \n\n116 \n \n \nC’est le produit, Madame la présidente, d’une réflexion et aussi d’une volonté politique. \nMon collègue, avant moi, a bien précisé que le travail a déjà été fait en amont par la Law Reform \nCommission. J’étais moi-même membre de cette Law Reform Commission. Il y a eu des \ndiscussions. Il y a eu des consultations au préalable. Donc, cette loi n’est pas une nouvelle loi. \nOn a archi discuté de cette loi.  \nLa volonté politique, évidemment, n’existait pas dans le passé. Aujourd’hui, on est en train \nde voir de visu cette volonté politique. Et l’opposition a le culot de critiquer cette volonté \npolitique pour aller vite en besogne. On a déjà pris huit mois. Donc, il faut aller vite, d’après \nmoi, et il ne faut pas critiquer. \nPourquoi un nouveau projet de loi ? Quelles sont les insuffisances qu’on cherche à corriger \net surtout, en quoi améliore-t-elle le sort des accusés, la qualité de la justice et la protection des \ndroits fondamentaux ? Permettez-moi, Madame la présidente, de répondre point par point. \nD’abord, pourquoi un nouveau projet de loi ? Toute société démocratique, nous allons voir, doit \nse remettre en question. La loi actuelle, le Criminal Appeal Act date de 1954. Ainsi, les \nréglementations et autres lois sont aussi désuètes, et je peux les qualifier de fossiles législatifs \nimprégnés de traces coloniales. Je constate que, malheureusement, nos amis de l’opposition \nveulent garder ces lois. \nDans toute société, Madame la présidente, il y a des intérêts différents des différentes \nparties. D’abord, d’un côté, la société doit être protégée, les victimes doivent être protégées, mais \naussi les accusés et les condamnés. Ce n’est pas parce qu’ils sont des accusés ou des condamnés \nqu’on ne doit pas respecter leurs droits.  \nD’ailleurs, notre Constitution, à travers différentes dispositions telles que les articles 3 et 5 \net surtout l’article 10, donne cette protection. Ainsi, Madame la présidente, les lois ordinaires \ndoivent être en conformité avec les lettres et l’esprit de notre Constitution. Tel n’était pas le cas, \nmalheureusement, avec certaines lois qu’on a héritées de l’ère coloniale. Le législateur a \nl’obligation constitutionnelle, je dirai, légale et aussi morale de trouver le juste équilibre pour \nconcilier les différents intérêts compétitifs dans une société guidée par un sens de justice, \nd’équité et du respect de la démocratie et des droits humains. \nCe projet de loi est né d’un constat. Notre cadre juridique existant en matière d’appel et de \nrévision pénale était devenu obsolète, aussi fragmenté, comme l’a bien précisé l’Attorney \n\n117 \n \n \nGeneral et mes autres collègues, et inadapté aux exigences contemporaines de la justice. Donc, \nles règles sont éparpillées, comme bien précisé par mes collègues avant, tantôt dans le Criminal \nAppeal Act, dans le Criminal Appeal Rules, tantôt dans le DIC, c’est-à-dire dans le District and \nIntermediate Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act, et dans d’autres lois et d’autres \nréglementations, et évidemment, cela manquait de clarté, d’uniformité et aussi d’efficacité.  \nEn somme, il s’agissait d’un cadre hérité de l’époque coloniale qui peinait à garantir une \njustice équitable, rapide et accessible à tous, en particulier aux personnes vulnérables et aussi aux \npersonnes sans ressource juridique. Et ce gouvernement a à cœur l’intérêt de ces personnes.  \nLe nouveau projet de loi, Madame la présidente, vise, donc, à centraliser d’abord, clarifier \net renforcer les procédures relatives à l’appel et à la révision des affaires pénales tout en les \nadaptant aux meilleures pratiques internationales. \nMaintenant, quelles sont les failles sous l’empire de la loi actuelle ? Quelles étaient les \nfailles des lois précédentes ? D’abord, Madame la présidente, il y avait une incohérence \njuridique : les règles étaient dispersées dans plusieurs textes. Je pense que quand vous faites une \ncomparaison entre la loi actuelle et le projet de loi, vous allez voir que le nouveau projet de loi \nest beaucoup plus structuré en six parties, comme l’a bien indiqué l’Attorney General.  \nC’est cela le drame. Je crois que le membre de l’opposition n’a pas bien lu la loi actuelle, \nle Criminal Appeal Act. Vous allez voir que parce qu’il y avait un drafting qui datait de 1954, \nc’était un genre de désordre. Par contre, avec la nouvelle loi, nous allons voir qu’elle est très bien \nstructurée.  \nDonc, il y avait aussi une autre lacune, c’est-à-dire, il y avait une complexité procédurale et \nd’ailleurs les démarches pour faire appel où demander une révision étaient trop techniques, je \ndirais, inaccessible pour les non-initiés et souvent hors de la portée des justiciables, surtout ceux \nqui n’avaient pas d’avocat. Et même c’était un peu complexe pour les nouveaux avocats. Comme \nvous le savez, Madame la présidente, le droit pénal à Maurice s’inspire du droit français mais par \ncontre toutes les procédures sont inspirées du droit anglais. Dans un système de droit mixte, il \nfallait dépoussiérer, il fallait moderniser cette loi.  \nEt aussi sous l’empire de l’ancienne loi, il y avait une lenteur judiciaire, pas par la faute des \njuges mais par la faute des procédures, dont l’absence des délais clairs et de mécanismes \n\n118 \n \n \nefficaces entraînaient des retards importants nuisant à la crédibilité du système judiciaire. Et \naussi, Madame la présidente, il y avait des obstacles à la révision post-condamnation. Les \nconditions pour obtenir une révision étaient si strictes que certaines erreurs judiciaires n’étaient \njamais corrigées. Il y avait aussi, je constate, une surcharge des juridictions supérieures ; les \nrecours abusifs où mal formulés encombraient inutilement les juridictions d’appel au détriment \ndes affaires réellement fondées. \nDonc le projet de loi introduit une série d’avancées notables et quelles sont ces avancées, \nMadame la présidente ? Maintenant on voit une sorte de codification, une sorte de structuration \nclaire de ces droits, l’ensemble des droits relatifs à l’appel et à la révision est désormais regroupé \ndans un seul texte qui est très important pour garantir d’abord la lisibilité, la cohérence et aussi \nune meilleure compréhension pour les profanes.  \nNous voyons aussi avec la nouvelle loi une accessibilité accrue. La simplification des \nprocédures facilite l’accès à la justice – un point très important, je dirais – notamment pour les \npersonnes non représentées où issues des milieux défavorisés et je mets l’emphase sur les gens \nissus des milieux défavorisés.  \nEt aussi, nous voyons une autre innovation qui est cette fois-ci un filtrage de recours non-\nfondé, avant cela n’existait pas. C’est ce qu’on appelle qu’il faut passer par un leave to appeal. \nDonc, l’introduction d’une procédure de demande d’autorisation permet aux juridictions de se \nconcentrer sur les cas présentant un véritable enjeu juridique.  \nOn a aussi introduit un point très innovateur, Madame la présidente, plus de souplesse pour \nles preuves nouvelles. Le texte facilite l’introduction d’éléments de preuve découvert après le \nprocès afin de prévenir des erreurs judiciaires. On voit aussi une dématérialisation des \nprocédures qui ouvre la voie, Madame la présidente, à une gestion, dans un contexte moderne, \nnumérique des recours, accélérant leur traitement et réduisant leur lourdeur administrative. Donc, \navec la nouvelle loi, on verra des délais beaucoup plus encadrés, le projet fixe des délais clairs \npour l’introduction et le traitement des recours, assurant une justice beaucoup plus rapide.  \nNous voyons aussi, Madame la présidente, une consolidation des droits de l’accusé et \nl’appelé. Donc, comment ce projet de loi renforce-t-il les droits de l’accusé ? Ce texte consacre, \nvous allez voir, pleinement des droits procéduraux fondamentaux. D’abord, le droit d’être \nentendu : toute personne condamnée a le droit de faire valoir ses arguments en appel ou en \n\n119 \n \n \nrévision, avec l’assistance d’un avocat si elle le souhaite ; accès aussi à l’aide juridictionnelle et \nlà, c’est un point très important, on a pu lier ce point fondamental avec l’autre projet de loi qu’on \navait passé.  \nDonc le projet s’articule avec la réforme de l’Aide légale pour garantir que personne ne \nsoit privée de recours pour des raisons financières et aussi on verra une réévaluation de la peine. \nIl permet de revoir des sanctions disproportionnées ou prononcées dans des conditions \ncontestables. Protection contre l’injustice, le texte, Madame la présidente, autorise des \njuridictions à ouvrir les affaires en cas de doute sérieux sur la culpabilité même après \nl’épuisement de recours ordinaires et cela est un point qui a été touché par mon collègue. On a \nsuivi de près, dans une société démocratique moderne où il le faut absolument, les standards \ninternationaux. Et là, nous allons voir que le projet de loi est aligné sur les engagements \ninternationaux, l’impact internationaux relatifs aux droits civils et politiques et consacre le droit à \nun procès équitable et à un recours effectif. Les principes de Bangalore, par exemple, Madame la \nprésidente, sur la déontologie judiciaire qui prône l’indépendance, la compétence et l’intégrité du \njudiciaire, et aussi les bonnes pratiques du Commonwealth, ainsi que les recommandations du \ncomité des droits de l’homme des Nations unies qui insistent sur l’importance des mécanismes \nefficaces de révision post-condamnation. \nDonc, en ce sens, Madame la présidente, le projet de loi replace notre législation pénale \ndont le giron des états modernes et démocratiques respectueux des droits fondamentaux. Donc, \nc’est pour cela que je suis surpris comment mon ami de l’opposition au lieu de féliciter \nl’Attorney General, est en train de critiquer.  \nDonc, nous voyons aussi une consolidation des droits humains, et comme vous le voyez \nbien, ce nouveau gouvernement a hâte de consolider les droits humains, donc nous voyons un \nrespect de l’état de droit et des droits humains.  \nCe projet de loi, encore une fois, Madame la présidente, est une affirmation du respect de \nl’État de droit. Il garantit la transparence dans le fonctionnement de la justice pénale. On voit \naussi une responsabilité accrue des juridictions, à rectifier les erreurs. L’égalité devant la loi pour \nque nul ne soit désavantagé dans l’exercice de ses droits. Il répond aussi, Madame la présidente, \nà des exigences morales fondamentales, un système juste, mais pas celui qui ne se trompe jamais \nmais celui qui reconnaît les fautes et les corrige. Donc, quel est impact sur l’ensemble du \n\n120 \n \n \nsystème pénal ? Nous allons voir avec cette nouvelle loi, une modernisation du système \njudiciaire. Le projet rationalise les flux des dossiers, réduit le retard et renforce l’autorité des \ndécisions de la judiciaire.  \nNous allons voir aussi, avec ce nouveau projet de loi, Madame la présidente, une crédibilité \nrenforcée. En permettant une justice plus accessible, rapide et équitable, il renforce la confiance \ndu publique dans l’institution judiciaire. Et ça c’est absolument important pour une démocratie. \nNous voyons aussi une justice beaucoup plus substantielle. Il ne s’agit pas uniquement de suivre \nles procédures, procédures oui, mais il y a des limites à des procédures, mais de rendre des \ndécisions justes dans l’esprit du droit. \nEt finalement, nous voyons, Madame la présidente, – cela est important dans une société et \nun état de droit – un équilibre entre les droits de l’accusé et les droits de la société. D’une part, il \nfaut protéger la société en général, les victimes aussi on n’a pas oublié, mais il faut respecter les \ndroits d’un accusé et pour cela il y a une garantie constitutionnelle. \nDonc ce texte réussi, Madame la présidente, à trouver un équilibre, je dois concéder, \ndélicat mais nécessaire pour une société démocratique. Il protège les droits fondamentaux de la \npersonne condamnée sans remettre en cause inutilement les décisions de justice – là aussi, c’est \nun point très important à retenir. Il évite des recours dilatoires ou abusifs parfois, qui saperaient \nla stabilité du système. Il préserve les intérêts des victimes, de la société en assurant que justice \nsoit rendue de manière efficace et sans impunité. Finalement, c’est un modèle d’équilibre, d’une \npart, rigueur judiciaire, humanisme et respect des droits de l’homme. \nEn conclusion, Madame la présidente, le Criminal Appeal and Criminal Review Bill n’est \npas une simple reforme technique comme bien précisé par l’Attorney General. Il s’agit en effet \nd’un acte de foi dans la justice, un acte de foi de notre Premier ministre et du vice-Premier \nministre dans la justice et de tous les membres de cette Assemblée, et aussi un signal clair que \nnotre république ne va pas tolérer l’injustice même au nom de la procédure. Il modernise notre \nappareil judiciaire, renforce les droits fondamentaux et consolide la paix sociale pour une justice \nbeaucoup plus crédible, accessible et surtout équitable. En adoptant ce texte, Madame la \nprésidente, nous affirmons d’une façon claire et nette que la justice n’est pas un privilège, je mets \nl’emphase sur ce point, mais un droit et aucune erreur judiciaire ne doit rester irréversible. \nJe vous remercie, Madame la présidente. \n\n121 \n \n \nMadam Speaker: Merci beaucoup. Je suis jalouse de ne pas pouvoir prendre la parole. \nAllez-y hon. Minister ! \n(5.50 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Housing and Lands (Mr S. Mohamed): Thank you. Madam Speaker, in \nfact when one reads the Explanatory Memorandum of this piece of legislation, there are certain \nwords that are used that in fact, give the clue as to what exactly this legislation is all about.  \nNow, when the word ‘clarify’ is used and immediately after that ‘simplify’, and then the \nthird word used is ‘standardise’, it is clear that this Bill is doing nothing else than simply do \nexactly what those three words say.  \nNow, it takes some qualities in certain people to be able to complicate what is simple and \nit’s exactly what I have witnessed today. Now, there are various reasons why such things are \ndone in order to complicate what is simple. It’s either one wants to be of bad faith and therefore \nonly opens one’s mouth for the sake of uttering certain words and making certain sounds or it is \nto try to be constructive.  \nNow, what I have heard the Opposition and allow me to halt a disjuncture and say, once \nagain, the ladies and gentlemen who are watching us outside this Assembly, have the opportunity \ntoday to see the Opposition benches, again, … \nMs Anquetil: Empty! \nMr Mohamed:  ... again, again, … \nMs Anquetil: Empty, as usual.  \nMr Mohamed: I said again three times because all three members who usually are seated \nthere – who have, I am sure, a lot of interesting things to contribute to the debate…  \nThe Prime Minister: Please, no. They don’t!  \nMr Mohamed: I am trying to be nice, hon. Prime Minister.  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Too nice! \nMr Mohamed: Too nice! I am just trying to be very diplomatic. It is not that I agree with \nwhatever they say and I will show why I don’t agree. I am not going to be very long.  \n\n122 \n \n \nThey are not here again and what exactly would be the explanation for their absence? It’s a \npity. It’s a pity because they are here in order to be able to encourage this culture of debate. We \ndo not have the monopoly of knowledge. We are not always right, we may debate and come to \nthe best solution for the people of Mauritius. That’s the whole idea of this democracy. And the \nfact that they are not here again, and again and again, shows exactly how they hold this \npopulation in high esteem and what type of esteem they hold the population in.  \nSo, let me go back to the Constitution. My late father, Senior Counsel, Mohamed, always \nsaid to me, whenever I started practicing law, even after 20 years or 30 years of practice, he \nwould say that – \n“Go to the law, read the Constitution.” \nAnd, I read Section 10 (5) of the Constitution – I say this because the hon. Member, Mr A. \nDuval, stated that this piece of legislation somehow, someplace is putting, is challenging the \nprinciple of ‘autrefois acquit and autrefois convict’. This principle of ‘autrefois acquit and \nautrefois convict’ is a legal principle that is rooted in the principle of res judicata. \nSo, it is as simple as that. You know, this is the very A B C de la loi. We learn this at law \nschool when we start. \nMadam Speaker: Translate res judicata.  \nMr Mohamed: Well, no one should be retried for an offense for which he has already \nbeen tried and there has been a judgment pronounced. If he has been acquitted, he cannot be \nretried again for the same offense.  \nMadam Speaker:  Good! \nMr Mohamed: However, there are exceptions in the law and that is why I think it is \nimportant to go to the Constitution. The Constitution says – \n“No person who shows that he has been tried by a competent court for a criminal offence \nand either convicted or acquitted shall again be tried for that offence or for any other \ncriminal offence of which he could have been convicted at the trial of that offence, except \nupon the order of a superior court in the course of appeal or review proceedings relating to \nthe conviction or acquittal.” \n\n123 \n \n \nSo, whatever, the hon. Attorney General is coming to propose today in this piece of legislation, is \nin line with what is already provided for under section 10 (5) of the Constitution. And I go \nfurther, it is in line with what is already in the law under the Criminal Appeal Act of 1955 as \namended. \nWhen I look at the original legislation and I see here section 11 of the Law as it is – \nSupplementary powers of Court and this is the section of the law that the hon. Member referred \nto– \n“(b)  \norder any witnesses who would have been compellable witnesses at the  trial to \nattend…” \nThat particular subsection or subsection (c) – \n“(c)  \nreceive the evidence, if tendered, of any witness (including the appellant) who is a \ncompetent but not compellable witness.” \nAll those issues under section 11 that the hon. Member takes objection to – it’s amazing – he \ntakes objection to what is in the Bill now when it is already provided for under section 11 here. \nThe hon. Attorney General and his officers have come and clarified everything; nothing \nmore. He said that there is importance for him to have been consulted. This government \nunderstands the meaning of consultation. This government and the proof – let’s look at the \nFinance Bill of today. It’s been circulated today. It is only going to be taken at Second Reading \non Friday and only the hon. Prime Minister will address the National Assembly. \nOn next Tuesday – we are giving ample time for everyone to be able to ascertain, assess, \nstudy, be ready for the debate because this government understands, appreciates and values the \nimportance of consultation, the importance of circulating a Bill that changes the things \nfundamentally but here, the question that I put and this is what he should have put – is there any \nfundamental change of such difference, of such importance that would warrant the need for \nconsultation? \nAnd here, I don’t see any fundamental change in principles. No change whatsoever in \nactual time, apart from clarifying the issues. Issues that cropped up in the case before the \nSupreme Court, the Maigrot case and other cases with regard to delay, when to appeal, at \n\n124 \n \n \nconviction, at the time of sentence, the delays – everything is clarified. So, I fail to really \nunderstand what was the point that the hon. Member was trying make.  \nAnd secondly, I think he spoke about suspended sentence. He did speak about suspended \nsentence. I mean, in order for there to be a suspended sentence, there needs to be a conviction, a \nsentence. And, if I understand him correctly and I am sure I understood what he meant, he meant \nthat there could be a suspended sentence without a sentence.  \nMadam Speaker:  Oh, wow! \nMr Mohamed: As I said, some people have the ability to complicate things that are very \nsimple. I am at great difficulty in understanding how can one have a suspended sentence without \na sentence. \nNow, I understand why he has allied himself with the MSM. I mean they really make a \nmess of things. Fair enough!  \nSo, now, Madam Speaker, let me take this Opportunity to and I don’t say it simply for the \nsake of saying, I really mean it. I would like to thank the hon. Attorney General for having \nunderstood that there was the need to simplify and clarify. And, what is the purpose of doing all \nthis? \n The purpose of doing all of this is also to satisfy the principles of democracy, to create \nease of access, clarity, resource optimisation, efficiency. All this is in the spirit of giving sense to \nwhat democracy is. Removing it from black on white written in a book and making it – we \nbreathe democracy.  \nAnd the proof of the pudding, as the hon. Prime Minister always says, is in the eating. You \nsee, they have always tried to criticise this government about many things and it’s their right but \nlet me say it and I think it is important for the people to understand. Each and every piece of \nlegislation that has been brought to this House has been the underpinning, has been to \nconsolidate democracy and even if they are to go outside and criticise, which is their right, they \nwill have no one trying to arrest them for having the right to express their views.  \nEven if they are to go outside and criticise, which is their right, they will have no one \ntrying to arrest them for having the right to express their views. On the contrary, they are entitled \nto have their views even if it makes no sense. They are entitled to it. \n\n125 \n \n \nThank you very much. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nHon. Attorney-General, your summing-up speech! \n(6.00 p.m.) \nMr Glover: Je regarde et je vois des sièges vides. Je ne vois pas mon confrère, mon \ncollègue de l’Assemblée, le Whip de l’opposition, entendre ce que j’ai à dire sur ce qu’il avait à \ndire plus tôt. Je ferais donc son procès in absentia. \nMadam Speaker, the initial point made by the Whip of the Opposition is quite as \nextraordinary as the rest of his intervention. He has qualified this Bill as being one which smacks \nof legislative ambush. Not only is that not the case, as will become apparent in the summing-up, \nto add to what my colleague, the hon. Minister of Housing and Lands has said, the Whip of the \nOpposition has failed to mention that the Finance Bill and associated legislations have been \ncirculated this Tuesday morning prior to the First Reading next Friday.  \nGiven the time we shall start on Friday, we shall hear only the mover of the Bill at Second \nReading stage. The Opposition will have ample time, another three more days, to be ready to \nreply to the hon. Prime Minister’s address. And this, they will do next Tuesday. \nSo, the surprising accusation of the Whip of the Opposition is to use an oft-quoted \nexpression by our own courts, an accusation which is devoid of any merit. The second matter he \nhad to say as an introduction to his speech was that we had not held formal consultations with the \nBar Association, the law society and the Law Reform Commission. Well, if we had too, we \nwould have. But since this Bill had more importantly resonance with the Judiciary, we held \nextensive consultations at every stage with the Judiciary, since it is the Judiciary that will be \napplying this law day in and day out. \nWhilst it is important to note that there is no constitutional duty to consult external bodies \nbefore legislating – and rightly so – given the separation of powers, this Government has always \nwelcomed the views of legal practitioners, because they are the ones who work within the system \nevery day and know where it needs improving. I was one of them only a few months ago. Of \ncourse, the Office of the Attorney General, which I have just joined, which is tasked with \n\n126 \n \n \ndrafting and piloting such legislations, is itself deeply familiar with the workings of our courts \nand the practical challenges they face. \nMadam Speaker, having had to sit and hear the quite extraordinary statements of the Whip \nof the Opposition, I am still reeling in disbelief at what he has said. Clearly – and I am being \nvery polite –, he has no idea what this Bill is all about. You see, Madam Speaker, in my younger \ndays, I remember clearly my father instilling in me a basic requirement to understand. You must \nread anything you need to, from the first page to the last, including the preface, the \nacknowledgments and the epilogue. This kept me in good stead in my years I studied at Oxford \nand the Middle Temple and throughout my four decades of practice at the Bar. When you do not \nread and think, you do not understand!  \nThe Whip of the Opposition has just understood what is clearly stated in the Explanatory \nMemorandum. The purpose, as my friend, hon. Mohamed, just stated, is to clarify, simplify and \nstandardise existing procedures for all appeals in criminal matters and modify certain procedures \nin order to be fairer to the accused parties.  \nThe Whip of the Opposition has attacked me when he stated that I have, by this Bill, \ndented a fundamental right – the right of appeal. How? He never said! His next point, in fact, \nthrew light on his lack of comprehension of this law. \nHe advocated, to the astonishment of all the lawyers in the House, that there cannot be an \nappeal against suspended sentences and community service orders. What nonsense! He should be \nashamed to make such clearly erroneous statements in this House.  \nA suspended sentence or a community service order cannot be ordered unless there has \nbeen a custodial sentence first. I hope he understands what custodial means! It means – and let \nme spell it out for him – imprisonment. His reference to Section 22 is another grave \nmisconception. Again, I am being very polite. What is provided in that section already exists in \nthe law. Quite surprisingly, the learned Whip of the Opposition just discovered that it existed! \nThe hon. Minister of Housing and Lands has, of course, taken us through the principal of \nautrefois acquit and autrefois convict. He has not answered the question of the Chair regarding \nres judicata. Res judicata means already decided, already adjudicated upon. Therefore, you \ncannot come back. \n\n127 \n \n \nMadam Speaker: I just wanted everybody to understand. \nMr Glover: In fine, Madam Speaker, this debate has brought to the fore one important \nfact, that this law has become absolutely necessary not only to bring certainty, clarity and \nsimplification to the law, but it has become absolutely necessary to ensure that some law \npractitioners, who, unfortunately, do not know their basic law, will now be able to refer to only \none statute in order to advise their clients as to the appeal process in criminal matters.  \nI am done, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Attorney-General, you have to commend the Bill again. \nMr Glover: I commend the Bill to the House. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nBill read a second time and committed. \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(Madam Speaker in the Chair) \nThe Criminal Appeal and Criminal Review Bill (No. XVII of 2025) was considered and \nagreed to. \nOn the Assembly resuming with the Madam Speaker in the Chair, Madam Speaker reported \naccordingly. \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Criminal Appeal and Criminal Review Bill (No. XVII \nof 2025) was read a third time and passed. \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now adjourn \nto Friday 25 July 2025 at 3.00 p.m.  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned!  \nAdjournment matters! \n\n128 \n \n \nIt is his right to do that. \nMATTER RAISED \n(6.14 p.m.) \nRODRIGUES HEALTH SERVICES – DEFECTIVE EQUIPMENT – CRITICAL \nSITUATION \nMr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues): Madam Speaker, the issue I am raising \ntonight is addressed to the hon. Minister of Health and Wellness, to whom I gave notice, and as a \nfollow-up to his comprehensive answer to my PQ B/749 this morning, I have been further \ninformed of the sufferings and difficulties of patients transferred from Rodrigues to Mauritius.  \nAlso, there are very seriously and critically defective medical equipment in Rodrigues, \nnamely the phaco machine for cataract surgery, scanner, sterilizer, x-ray, cystoscope. There are \naround 300 patients awaiting physiotherapy leading to a situation of état d’urgence dans le \nservice de la santé à Rodrigues. C’est une question de vie ou de mort.  \nMay I humbly request, the hon. Minister, pending his multidisciplinary team’s setup, to \ncollaborate with Rodrigues and his high-level delegation visit to Rodrigues to promptly look into \npossible remedial actions thereof? Thank you. \nThe Minister of Health and Wellness (Mr A. Bachoo): Madam Speaker, I have already \nmentioned that the entire responsibility lies in the Regional Assembly of Rodrigues but as far as \nmy Ministry is concerned, I am going to convey your request to the officers of my Ministry and I \nwill see to it that the needful be done. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. So, now, I think, we can be released. \nAt 6.14 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Friday 25 July 2025 at 3.00 \np.m. \n \n \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nEXPORT INCENTIVE SCHEMES (PHASING OUT)– ECONOMIC SAFEGUARDS  \n\n129",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/766",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 766,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/766) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in regard to \nLe Morne Public Beach, especially, at the stretch between the Riu and St Regis hotels, he will \nstate if consideration will be given for the – \n(a) \nrenovation of the existing toilets and provision of electricity and water thereat, and \n(b) \ninstallation of – \n(i) \nshowers; \n(ii) \nshops for beach hawkers selling food and drinks, and \n(iii) \na mess room for the toilet cleaners.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n2030 RENEWAL ENERGY ROAD MAP – OFFSHORE WINDFARM PROJECT – \nREPORT DETAILS & RECOMMENDATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/767",
      "sitting_id": "22-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-22",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 767,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/767) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the implementation of the 2030 \nRenewal Energy Road Map published in 2022, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to – \n(a) \nwhere matters stand regarding the setting up of a planned 50 MW Offshore Wind \nFarm, as announced by the previous Government, and \n\n139 \n \n \n(b) \nthe number of projects and expression of interests obtained as at to date regarding \nocean renewables like offshore wind farms and wave and tidal power plants, \ngiving details of reports, feasibility studies and recommendations available in \nrelation thereto, if any.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-22-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/768",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 768,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/768) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Sir \nSeewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom Airport Terminal Operations Ltd., information as to whether consideration will be given \nfor the provision of – \n(a) \nadditional parking slots, roads and exit gates thereat, and  \n\n18 \n \n \n(b) \nadequate directional signage on the parking areas of the old terminal, indicating the \ncurrent use made thereof and if same will be operational anew and, if so, when, \ngiving details thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Chief Executive Officer of \nAirport Terminal Operations Ltd that the car park at the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam \nInternational Airport has a total of 1,562 parking slots located as follows – \n(i) \nthe Old Terminal - \n670 slots, and \n(ii) \nthe New Terminal - \n892 slots. \n 1,207 of these parking slots are dedicated to the public whilst the remaining 355 are \nused by airport stakeholders.  \n Following complaints received from members of the public with respect to the lack of \nparking spaces at the New Terminal, two surveys were conducted by the Airport Terminal \nOperations Ltd on 05 and 10 March 2025, respectively. These surveys had revealed that 35% \nof the parking slots were occupied by car rental vehicles, thus, reducing the availability of \nparking facilities for the public. The situation becomes particularly chaotic during peak seasons \ndue to insufficient parking spaces.  \n To address this issue, a dedicated parking zone of 144 slots for car rental operators, is \nnow operational at the Old Terminal car park since May of this year.  Consequently, this \ndecision has significantly helped to eliminate the persisting problem of parking available for \nthe general public near the New Terminal Building. Since these changes have been made, no \ncomplaints have been received. \n With regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Chief Executive Officer \nthat there are now already adequate parking spaces, roads and exit gates at the airport. It is, \ntherefore, not envisaged to provide additional facilities at this point. \n As regards part (b) of the question, I am informed that the 670 parking slots at the Old \nTerminal have always been operational. As stated, 144 slots are dedicated for car rental \noperators and the remaining 526 are meant for the general public. Adequate directional signage \nis available to guide car park users, through and out the Old Terminal parking.  \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that following an Open National/International \nBidding exercise, a contract was awarded on 12 August 2024 to VDTEC Distributors Ltd for \nthe sum of 1,421,493.00 dollars excluding VAT, which would make around Rs66,810,171 at \n\n19 \n \n \nthe time, for the implementation of a Smart Car Park Management Solution project in two \nphases. \n This project is expected to smoothen the traffic flow and improve parking experience \nat the airport. Phase 1 of the project which is presently being implemented, is expected to be \noperational in December of this year.  \nI also wish to inform the House that the Board of Airport Terminal Operations Ltd did \nnot deem it important to appoint a Consultant to ascertain that the works undertaken is in \ncompliance with the terms of the contract. Secondly, another disturbing fact is that one of the \nmembers of the Bid Evaluation Committee is the very person who is now certifying the quality \nof the works prior to the payment. That is the MSM! This matter has been referred to the \nFinancial Crimes Commission. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nMr Apollon: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. Just a suggestion – perhaps to consider \nputting automatic paying tickets for parking to reduce the traffic at the airport. I got a \nsupplementary question. Is the hon. Prime Minister aware that daily fighting and discussions \namong taxi operators at the SSR Airport have been reported several times at the Police Station \nof the SSR Airport? No action has been taken. Will an investigation be initiated to ensure the \nsafety of our citizens at the airport? \nThe Prime Minister: I am not aware that there have been no investigations but I will \ncertainly transmit this to the Airport’s authority. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite \nRivière! \nBUDGET 2025-2026 – MOTOR VEHICLES – EXCISE DUTY – NEW RATES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/769",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 769,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/769) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the new rates of \nexcise duty applicable on motor vehicles with effect from 01 July 2025, he will state if his \nMinistry is in presence of requests from importers and their association regarding vehicles \nshipped before 05 June 2025 and after 05 June 2025 with Import Permit as at 5th June 2025 \nand, if so, indicate if a meeting has been held therewith and, if any, give details of the outcome \nthereof and, if not, why not. \n\n20",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, in the Budget Speech 2025-2026, I announced \nthat the rates of excise duty on vehicles would be increased. This budgetary measure was \nimplemented through a Financial Resolution passed on the day of the Budget, that is, 5th June \n2025. This makes the increase in the rates of excise duty effective as from 6th June 2025. \nIn a spirit of fairness, we provided a transitional period whereby a vehicle continued to \nbe subjected to the old excise rate as was applicable, that is, prior to 6th June 2025, provided \nthat – \n(i) \nthe vehicle has been issued with an import permit or has been shipped or placed in \na bonded warehouse before 6th June 2025 – there are two conditions, and \n(ii) \nwas cleared from the Customs on or before 30th June 2025. \nAccordingly, after the transitional period, that is, from 01 July 2025, all vehicles cleared \nfrom Customs are being subjected to the new excise rates. \nRepresentations have been received from dealers of both new and second-hand imported \nmotor vehicles through their respective associations. \nThe ‘Motor Vehicle Dealers Association,’ which represents dealers of new imported \nmotor vehicles requested in writing that the cut-off date of 30 June 2025 for the transitional \nperiod be extended by 6 months, that is, to 31 December 2025. \nThe ‘Dealers in Imported Vehicles Association’, which represents second-hand imported \nvehicles, requested for a meeting with Government to discuss issues that they had on the \ntransitional provision or the new tax rate on hybrid vehicles. \nOfficers of the Ministry of Finance held a meeting on 25 June 2025 with representatives \nof the ‘Dealers in Imported Vehicles Association’, namely the Chairperson and two members.  \nThe latter made the following proposals – \n(i) \nto extend the cut-off date of 30 June 2025 to 30 September 2025 for cars already \nshipped as well as those not yet shipped, but for which an import permit had already \nbeen obtained before 06 June 2025; \n(ii) \nmotor vehicles in respect of which applications for import permit had been made \non 05 June 2025, that is, on Budget Day, be subjected to the old rate of excise \nduty, and \n\n21 \n \n \n(iii) \nto extend the cut-off date of 30 June 2025 to 15 July 2025 for cars in bonded \nshowrooms or warehouses due to administrative bottlenecks following a surge in \nthe number of vehicles requiring clearance at the level of various government \nagencies. \nMadam Speaker, as regards to the extension of the cut-off date, I wish to highlight that \nthe two Associations had requested different extension dates. Entertaining their requests would \nhave accentuated the alarming rate of increase in vehicles on the road and defeated the very \npurpose of introducing that measure. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the Mauritius Revenue Authority that, during the \ntransitional period, which we extended and lasted for 25 days, a total of 6,703 cars, of which, \n4,093 were new and 2,610 imported second-hand cars were cleared by the Customs Department \nunder the old rates of excise duty. \nI think these figures speak for themselves, Madam Speaker. \nThe number of cars cleared during the transitional period represents more than three \ntimes the average monthly import in 2024, which was 2,020 cars. In fact, the number of cars \ncleared during the 25 days of the transitional period represents nearly 30% of the total number \nof imported cars in 2024 – total number. \nIt is evident, therefore, that dealers in new and imported motor vehicles have been able \nto take full advantage of the transitional period. \nDuring the month of June 2025, imports of motor vehicles led to a total outflow of foreign \ncurrencies of around USD 200 million. This has impacted negatively on the trade deficit as \nwell as the availability of foreign currencies on the forex market. \nTherefore, Government does not intend to extend the cut-off date of the transitional \nperiod. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister.  \nYes! \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente, est-ce que le Premier ministre peut expliquer à la \nChambre pourquoi – même s’il a, dans sa réponse, donné beaucoup d’explications – un délai \naussi court de seulement 24 jours a été imposé pour tout finaliser ? Alors qu’il faut entre six et \nhuit semaines à un bateau pour arriver à Maurice, que ce soit depuis le Japon ou de l’Angleterre, \npar exemple. \n\n22 \n \n \nThe Prime Minister: I must say, Madam Speaker, that there were discussions and many \npeople wanted not to have a transitional period at all. The cut-off date had to be on Budget \nDay, that is, the next day, on 06 June. But we decided to give some time.  \nAs I mentioned, Madam Speaker, look at the number of cars that were imported during \nthat short period, and how much the Government actually lost. But that is the way it is! \nMr Quirin: Une dernière question, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Oui, allez-y! \nMr Quirin: Donc, comme je l’ai dit, vu le temps que prennent les bateaux pour arriver \nà Port-Louis, le Premier ministre peut-il – malgré tout ce qu’il a dit et je l’ai bien compris – \nenvisager d’accorder un délai raisonnable de 92 jours aux importateurs, comme cela avait été \nle cas pour une transaction similaire en 2016, à travers le G.N. 165 de 2016 en fait ? \nThe Prime Minister: In our case, the answer is no. \nMadam Speaker: Très bien. \nNext question! Hon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \nANGUS ROAD, VACOAS – IMMOVEABLE PROPERTIES ACQUISITION – \nINVESTIGATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/770",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 770,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/770) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nallegations levelled against Mr P.K.J. and Mrs K.J. in relation to the acquisition of immoveable \nproperties at Angus Road, in Vacoas, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to where matters stand regarding the inquiry initiated \nthereinto, indicating the – \n(a) \nnames of the witnesses heard in relation thereto, further indicating if late Mr L.G. \nand Mr P.K.J. have been heard, and  \n(b) \nif there has been any evidence of attempts to close the inquiry.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Financial Crimes \nCommission that there is an ongoing investigation on the allegations with respect to the \nacquisition of immovable properties of the former Prime Minister at Angus Road. \n\n23 \n \n \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, this inquiry is still going on at the FCC, and \ntherefore, it would not be advisable to give further information on that. \nBut as regards part (b) of the question, the straight answer is yes.  The House may wish \nto recall that in June 2014, the Attorney General’s Office had made a request for Mutual Legal \nAssistance to the UK authorities on the very subject. This request had been made specifically \nto trace the money trail in this very matter. However, soon after the MSM-led coalition came \nto power in December 2014, the then Attorney General, Mr Ravi Yerrigadoo, had, in early \n2015, advised the defunct ICAC that the MSM-led government did not wish to pursue the \nrequest for Mutual Legal Assistance with the UK authorities.  \n(Interruptions) \nThat is plainly, plainly interference in an inquiry.  \nIt is deeply troubling, Madam Speaker, that such a crucial avenue of international \ncooperation was deliberately shut down. \nThis only reinforces the concerns about how politically sensitive matters were handled \nor rather mishandled in the past 10 years by the former MSM-led government.  Instead of \nsupporting the search for the truth, steps were allegedly taken to block investigations. To kill \ninvestigations, in fact! \nWe, on the other hand, are committed to institutional integrity, accountability, and the \nproper functioning of the judicial process. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, your supplementary! \nMr Jhummun: Thank you. But the hon. Prime Minister must acknowledge that the \npublic demands clear and tangible outcomes from such inquiry. Can he give assurance to this \nHouse that this will be the case? \nThe Prime Minister: I can give the total assurance, 100,000%, that this will be the case. \nNo cover-up. Nobody will be spared. The truth will have to prevail. \n(Interruptions) \n \nMr Bhagwan: …bizin met bracelet dan zot lamain! \nMadam Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne Longue! \n \n\n24 \n \n \nFORMER COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, MR A.K.D. – TENURE OF OFFICE – \nCAR ALLOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/771",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 771,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/771) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Mr. A.K.D., former Commissioner of Police, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the number of Government vehicles \n– \n(a) \nallocated thereto from the Police Car Pool during his tenure of office, indicating \nthe – \n(i) \nmake, model and registration number;  \n(ii) \nduration, and  \n(iii) purpose thereof, and  \n(b) \nacquired therefor, indicating – \n(i) \nthe make, model and registration number;  \n(ii) \nthe purchase price and running cost thereof, and  \n(iii) if they were sold to him following his retirement and, if so, indicate the selling \nprice thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, regarding part (a) of the question, I am informed \nby the Commissioner of Police that seven vehicles from the Police Car Pool were allocated to \nthe former Commissioner of Police during his tenure of office… \n(Interruptions) \n \nAn hon. Member: Seven? \n \nThe Prime Minister: Seven! Yes, seven!  \n(Interruptions) \nEven I do not have seven! \n… from 03 August 2021 to 12 November 2024. \nIn respect to parts (a) (i) and (ii) of the question, I am tabling the information requested \nby the hon. Member. \n\n25 \n \n \nWith regard to part (a) (iii) of the question, I am informed that there is an ongoing \ninvestigation on this matter. \nWith regard to parts (b) (i), (ii) and (iii) of the question, I am further informed by the \nCommissioner of Police that during the tenure of Mr Anil Kumar Dip, former Commissioner \nof Police, no vehicle was specifically acquired by the government for his use, although, in \naccordance with the recommendation of the 2021 PRB Report, the Commissioner of Police \nmay either be allocated a government vehicle within the prescribed ceiling value for both \nofficial and private use or opt for a 100% duty exemption car up to 2000 cc with relevant \nallowances. \nUpon his retirement on 13 November 2024, Mr Anil Kumar Dip acquired a car from the \nVIP Car Pool of make Porche, model Macan for the sum of Rs415,140.00, which was delivered \nto him on 16 November 2024. \nMadam Speaker: Mr Caserne, you are alright? Yes! \nThe hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES – CIVIL MARRIAGES – RODRIGUAN & FOREIGN NATIONALS \nFORMALITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/772",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 772,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/772) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime Minister, \nMinister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the celebration of civil marriage \nbetween a Rodriguan and a foreign national and between foreign nationals in Rodrigues, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Civil Status Office, information as to the \nprocedure that obtains specifically on the publication aspect thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Civil Status Division, that \nthe celebration of civil marriages in Rodrigues, including those between a Rodriguan and a \nforeign national, as well as between two foreign nationals, is governed by the Civil Status Act \nwhich applies across the Republic of Mauritius. \nAs regards the publication procedure for marriages involving a non-citizen to a citizen, I \nam informed that – \na) \nboth persons must appear in person at the Central Civil Status Office to submit a \njoint application for publication, along with all the mandatory documents; \n\n26 \n \n \nb) \nupon verification and acceptance of the documents, the Civil Status Officer \nproceeds with the publication of the intended marriage at the Central Civil Status \nOffice, the Civil Status Office of the district where each party has resided for at \nleast seven days, and the Civil Status Office of the district where the marriage is \nmeant to take place; \nc) \nthe publication notice is affixed in the respective offices for a period of 30 \nconsecutive days. It is to be noted that the civil marriage cannot be celebrated \nduring that period of publication, that is, 30 days; \nd) \nmoreover, during the 30-day publication period, any person may lodge a notice of \nobjection to the marriage with the Registrar, and \ne) \nif no objection is received, or if any objection is overruled, the marriage may then \nbe celebrated within a period of three months.  \nMadam Speaker, with regard to marriages between two non-citizens, I am informed that \nthe procedure is as follows – \na) \nan application for publication of the intended marriage, along with all required \ndocuments, must be submitted to the Central Civil Status Office either via email or \nthrough a registered wedding coordinator at least one month prior to the intended \ndate of the celebration, to allow for necessary verification and clearance from the \nPassport and Immigration Office; \nb) \nupon arrival in Mauritius, both parties must report in person to the Central Civil \nStatus Office for verification of their original documents; \nc) \nonce the documents have been verified and approved, the parties proceed to the \nCivil Status Office of the district where the marriage is meant to be celebrated to \ncomplete the publication procedures, and \nd) \nthe civil marriage may then be celebrated on the day immediately following the \nday of publication. \nAs for Rodrigues Citizens intending to marry a foreign citizen or for two foreign citizens \nto marry in Rodrigues, they have to follow the process in Mauritius, as it is described above, \nand therefore, proceed to Rodrigues for the celebration of the civil marriage. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, your supplementary? \n\n27 \n \n \nMr Edouard: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I thank the hon. Prime Minister for his reply. \nSome years back, I understand that the procedures were done in Rodrigues, can the hon. Prime \nMinister inform the House if he will consider that this be resumed, as it was before? \nThe Prime Minister: I must say I didn’t quite understand the question. You want a \ndifferent procedure for Rodrigues? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, he said – will you accept to go back to the previous procedure \nwhen it was done in Rodrigues. \nThe Prime Minister: I will have to look into that matter. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, I think so. What is interesting is that Mauritius is not Gretna \nGreen. You can’t just go and get married, you need publication. \nOkay, I think now we have reached the Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine \nMagnien, hon. Apollon! \nMALHERBES, CUREPIPE – 24 SEPTEMBER 2024 INCIDENT – MR G. G. \nCOMPLAINT – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/773",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 773,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/773) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the incident \nwhich occurred on or about 24 September 2024 at Malherbes, in Curepipe, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to where matters \nstand regarding the inquiry initiated thereinto following the complaint lodged by Mr. G. G.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that, on 24 \nSeptember 2024 at around 19 20 hours, Mr G.G. reported to the Police that, earlier at about 17 \n00 hours, he was in the company of five persons and they were peacefully demonstrating on \nthe pavement near the New Social Living Development Housing Units at Résidence Malherbes. \nAll six individuals were wearing white T-shirts bearing the inscription “NON A DEAL PITI-\nMAMA” and were holding a banner on which was written: “NON A DEAL PITI-MAMA ET \nRANN NU LATER.”   \nThe House may wish to recall that the deal ‘PITI-MAMA’ pertained to a case of potential \nconflict of interest given that it involved a transfer of a 60-year lease for a plot of land in Port \nLouis.  \n\n28 \n \n \nAt one point during the demonstration, four individuals known to the declarant \napproached the group, pushed them, forcibly took the banner and tore it, and then uttered \noffensive words directed at them. \nI am further informed, Madam Speaker, by the Commissioner of Police that on the 27 \nDecember 2024, that is, three months after the incident, the case was referred to the Central \nCriminal Investigation Department for further investigation. \nDuring the course of the enquiry, Police recorded statements from the complainant, the \nfive individuals who were with him at the material time, and four of the Police Officers who \nwere on duty thereat. \nThis inquiry is still ongoing. So far, no person has been arrested. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Apollon! \nMr Apollon: Okay! \nMadam Speaker: Alright, the hon. Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne \nLongue, hon. Caserne! \nCITIZEN SUPPORT PORTAL – COMPLAINTS – FOLLOW-UP & MONITORING – \nSTATE-OWNED COMPANIES’ SERVICES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/774",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 774,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/774) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Citizen Support Portal, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCitizen Support Unit, information as to – \n(a)  the manner in which complaints lodged through same are followed-up and \nmonitored, and  \n(b)  if consideration will be given for the inclusion of State-Owned Companies offering \nservices to the citizens thereon and, if so, when and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the Citizen Support Portal (CSP) which was \nlaunched in April 2017, is a digital platform that allows citizens to register their complaints, \nqueries, and suggestions related to government services. Each registered complaint is allocated \na ticket number. At the backend of the portal, the CSP connects 583 Ministries, Departments, \n\n29 \n \n \nLocal Authorities, Parastatal Bodies and some State-Owned Companies for the purpose of \nresolving the complaints and channelling the suggestions and queries.  \nMadam Speaker, in regard to part (a) of the question, when a citizen registers a ticket \nthrough the website or a mobile app, it is automatically channelled to the CAB nearest to his \nresidence. The Citizen Support Officer (CSO) posted there, reviews the case and, where \npossible, addresses the problem.  If the issue requires support from any Ministry or Department \nor Parastatal Body, then the CSO transfers the ticket directly on the system to the Desk Officer \nor the Focal Point designated by the organisation concerned. It is the responsibility of the \norganisation to resolve the ticket within different timeframes set by them and to inform the \ncomplainant accordingly.  \n \nThe Focal Point analyses and monitors all the tickets which have been created within \nthe Organisation and its subsidiary Departments and Parastatal Bodies.  \nThe CSU also conducts an overall monitoring of tickets registered on a regular basis to \nidentify recurring and systemic issues and provide Ministries with evidence-based insights for \nperformance monitoring, policy, and service improvement. \nMadam Speaker, in regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that as at 24 July \n2025, 14 State-Owned Enterprises under the aegis of various Ministries have been included \ninto the CSU software ecosystem and data analytics dashboard.  \nOther State-Owned Enterprises, Statutory Bodies, and Parastatal Organisations are bring \nencouraged to register on the Portal. It will be in the public interest that all such bodies be taken \non board of the CSU Portal. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nYes, the hon. Second Member for Rodrigues, Mr François! \nCHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO – UK GOVERNMENT & MAURITUS \nAGREEMENT – CITIZENSHIP RIGHTS OF CHAGOSSIANS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/775",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 775,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/775) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime Minister, \nMinister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the agreement between the \nGovernment of the United Kingdom and of the Republic of Mauritius over the Chagos \nArchipelago, he will state the recent development in relation thereto in the UK Parliament and \nthe impact thereof on the citizenship rights of the Chagossians, if any. \n\n30",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed that a Bill entitled “Diego Garcia \nMilitary Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill” was presented to the UK House of \nCommons and read for the first time on 15 July 2025.  The purpose of the Bill is, inter-alia, to \nprovide for the dissolution of the so-called “British Indian Ocean Territory”. \nAs per the press release recently issued by the British High Commission, Chagossians’ \nBritish citizenship remains unaffected by the domestic law enacted by the UK Parliament to \ngive effect, that is to the Agreement between Mauritius and the UK concerning the Chagos \nArchipelago including Diego Garcia.   \nMadam Speaker, nothing in this Agreement between Mauritius and the UK on the Chagos \nArchipelago purports to adversely affect any citizenship rights that any Chagossians may be \nentitled to under the UK citizenship or nationality laws. \nFor the avoidance of any doubt, I wish to recall that Mauritius has never recognized the \nso-called “British Indian Ocean Territory” which was purportedly created by the UK following \nthis unlawful excision of the Chagos Archipelago from the territory of Mauritius prior to its \naccession to independence. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! It’s alright! \nYes, the hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River! \nADSU – WESTERN DIVISION TEAM –– AREA UNDER JURISDICTION – \nOFFICERS & VEHICLES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/776",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 776,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/776) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Western Division \nTeam of the Anti-Drug and Smuggling Unit, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \nthe Commissioner of Police, information as to the – \n(a)  number of officers attached thereto; \n(b)  area under their jurisdiction, and  \n(c)  number of vehicles at the disposal thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat the Anti-Drug and Smuggling Unit (ADSU) of the Western Division operates under the \n\n31 \n \n \ncommand of a Superintendent of Police, who reports to the Deputy Commissioner of Police in \ncharge of ADSU. Its office is located at the Divisional Headquarters in Rose Hill. \nIn regard to part (a) of the question, the Western Division has 58 police officers of various \ngrades. The team includes supervisory, investigative, and operational personnel. \nRegarding part (b) of the question, I am informed that for operational effectiveness, the \nWestern Division is deployed into five sub-teams in 36 regions comprising inter alia Albion, \nBlack River, Beau Bassin, Rose Hill and Bambous. \nRegard to part (c) of the question, I am informed that a fleet of 15 vehicles is at the \ndisposal of the Division. \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed that while ADSU sub-teams are assigned specific \njurisdictions within the Western Division, they retain the authority to operate island-wide, \nparticularly if there is intelligence about urgent threats. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, one question.  \nMr Babajee: Thank you, Madam Speaker. The hon. Prime Minister just mentioned – \n‘area covered’. Will he consider to bring a new Western Division to the West – a new \nheadquarter or main office to the West? \nThe Prime Minister: Now, this is a proposal that is being looked at because when it is \nat Rose Hill, that is the complaint that has been made. They are looking whether it is possible \nto split. I just said, there are sub-divisions but may be that should be considered.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay, happy? \nThe hon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac. \nMRS. S.O., ATTORNEY AT LAW – SALARY AND ALLOWANCES – PERIOD \n2015-2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/777",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 777,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/777) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mrs. S.O., \nAttorney at Law, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the total quantum \nof fees and allowances paid out thereto, together with the other fringe benefits to which she \nwas entitled over the period 2015 to 2024 in her capacity as legal representative, chairperson, \n\n32 \n \n \nboard member and for any other legal services rendered to the different Ministries and \nparastatal bodies.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, on the basis of information gathered so far, Mrs \nSonah-Ori has served as – \n(i) \nCommissioner for the Protection of Borrowers for period 15 May 2015 to 21 \nOctober 2019, drawing a monthly salary of Rs100,000, a travelling allowance of \nRs9,000 and a driver’s allowance of Rs7,000.  \nMrs Sonah-Ori was re-appointed on 13 December 2019 with a monthly salary, \nwhich was then increased to Rs120,000, a travelling allowance which was Rs9,000, \nbut with a driver’s allowance of Rs8,400. She resigned on 27 February 2020. \n(ii) \nShe also served as a Member of the Assessment Review Committee for a period of \nthree years, with effect from 02 July 2020, with an all-inclusive monthly allowance \nof Rs86,845 and a monthly travelling allowance of Rs11,500. \nFollowing the PRB report in 2021, her monthly all-inclusive allowance was revised \nto Rs96,295 and travelling allowance of Rs 12,000 with effect from 01 January \n2021 up to 30 June 2022. The travelling allowance was also increased to Rs13,200 \nas from 01 July 2022.  \nMrs Sonah-Ori was re-appointed as Member of the ARC for a further period of 3 \nyears, with effect from 01 July 2023, and she resigned on 17 October 2024. \n(iii) She was a Board Member of AHL Properties from September 2023 to November \n2024, drawing Rs10,000 monthly salary as board fees. \n(iv) She was also Board Member of Landscope (Mauritius Ltd) from March 2018 to \nOctober 2019, and from March 2020 to November 2024, with a monthly fee of \nRs25,000. \n(v) \nShe was a Board Member of BPML Freeport Services Ltd from May 2018 to \nNovember 2024, for a monthly fee of Rs8,500. \n(vi) She was also a Board Member of Informatics Parks Ltd, … \n(Interruptions)  \nAn hon. Member: Jackpot! Jackpot!  \n\n33 \n \n \nThe Prime Minister: … from May 2018 to October 2019, drawing a monthly fee of \nRs10,500. \n(vii) She was also a Member of the Council of the Mahatma Gandhi Institute/ \nRabindranath Tagore Institute from 2015 to 2019, for a total fee of Rs98,160. \n(viii) She was also the Chairperson of the Senior Appointment Committee of the \nMauritius Institute of Education, from April 2017 to October 2019 for a total fee \nof Rs102,599. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker, it is not over. It is not over.  \nMrs Sonah-Ori also served as Legal Adviser to various public organisations – \n(i) \nAirports of Mauritius Co. Ltd, from November 2023 to October 2024, for a fee of \nRs1.3 million; \n(Interruptions) \n(ii) \nShe was, again, a Legal Adviser to Mauritius Duty Free Paradise, from July 2016 \nto December 2023, drawing legal fees of Rs4.8 million;  \n(iii) She was also a Member of the Mauritius Broadcasting Corporation, from March \n2024 to January 2025, drawing Rs239,900 as fees; \nMr Mohamed: Voler! Voler! \nThe Prime Minister:  \n(iv) She was also a Member of the SBM Holdings Ltd. She was earning fees of Rs4.7 \nmillion in 2024, and \n(v) \nShe was also a Member of the SBM Bank (Mauritius) Ltd, for the years 2020 to \n2024, and believe it or not, for a total fee of Rs37.2 million. \n(Interruptions) \nMs Anquetil: Shame!  \nMr Mohamed: Voler!  \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, not over …  \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members: Not over! \n\n34 \n \n \nThe Prime Minister: Mrs Sonah-Ori was enlisted as legal representative for the \nfollowing institutions –  \n(i) \nThe Mauritius Police Force, representing former Commissioners of Police in \nseveral cases, drawing a total of Rs4.3 million; \n(Interruptions) \n(ii) \n She was also the legal representative of the Independent Broadcasting Authority, \nin June 2022, for a fee of Rs61,000; \n(iii) She was also the legal representative of the Information and Communication \nTechnologies Authority from 2016 to 2024… \nAn hon. Member : Circule sa la liste la ! \nThe Prime Minister: … for a fee of Rs12.1 million; \n(Interruptions) \n(iv) \nShe was also the legal representative of Mauritius Housing Company Ltd for \nperiod October 2021 to March 2025, at a cost of Rs1.4 million; \n(v) \nFurthermore, she was also the legal representative at the Financial Intelligence \nUnit, for services provided in December 2023 and January 2024, at a cost of Rs1.5 \nmillion; \nMr Assirvaden: Franco, kot ton al asizer laba ! \n(Interruptions) \nEkoute! \nThe Prime Minister: \n(vi) \nMadam Speaker, she was also a legal representative for Air Mauritius Ltd, for a \ndisciplinary committee in March 2017, for a fee of Rs115,000; \nMr Jhummun: Chorni! \nThe Prime Minister: \n(vii) \nShe was also the legal representative Polytechnics Mauritius Ltd, from January \n2018 to September 2018, and in February 2021, against a fee of Rs188,400;  \n\n35 \n \n \n(viii) She was also the legal representative of Independent Review Panel, for two cases \nin 2020 and 2023, against a total payment of Rs567,500, for two cases, and \n(ix) \nMaubank Ltd, she was also the legal representative there for period January 2022 \nto December 2024, for a total fee of Rs348,700. \nMadam Speaker, for period 2015 to 2024, Mrs Sonah-Ori, Attorney-at-law, has received \na total amount of Rs82.7 million… \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members: Shame! Shame! Shame! \nMr Jhummun: Sa kalite la!  \nAn hon. Member: Maha chorni sa! \nMr Jhummun:  Maha chor! \nAn hon. Member: Chorni!  \nMr Jhummun:  Chorni!  \nThe Prime Minister: In addition, Mrs Sonah-Ori has made a claim of Rs2,027,500 to \nthe FCC. If we add this, the sum amounts to an astronomical figure of Rs 84.7 million in favour \nof Mrs Sonah-Ori. \nI sometimes ask myself, Madam Speaker, were there no other Attorneys in Mauritius? \nMs Anquetil: Incroyable! \n The Prime Minister: Only one person! \n(Interruptions) \nYou ask yourself – “What do these people eat?” \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: What could they be eating to take so much money? \nMr Jhummun: Sona! Sona!  \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: How fat can you get on money? \nMs Anquetil: Incroyable! \n\n36 \n \n \nAll hon. Members: Shame! Shame! Shame! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue, Mr \nA. Duval.  \nAn hon. Member: Time is over! \nMr Jhummun: Sona! Ena beze la! \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Zot inn fini sa pays la zot inn garde! \nMs Savabaddy: Apre tonn envi kone Pan African komie inn depanse, komie pann \ndepanse ? Mo pou dir twa la! \nMadam Speaker: Okay, let us have this one. Then, we will stop.  \nYes, hon. Prime Minister!  \nPAN-AFRICAN PARLIAMENT – MAURITIUS DELEGATION & \nPARTICIPATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/778",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 778,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/778) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Fifth Ordinary Session of the Sixth Parliament of the Pan-African Parliament, \nheld in Midrand, South Africa, from 16 July to 01 August 2025, he will state whether an official \ndelegation of the National Assembly of Mauritius participated therein and, if so, indicate – \n(a) \n the composition of the delegation, duration of stay and total costs incurred in \nrespect of air travel, accommodation and per diem allowances; \n(b) \n whether the members of the delegation were sworn in as members of the Pan-\nAfrican Parliament, and \n(c) \n the meetings, committees or other events in which the members of the delegation \nparticipated.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I wish to refer the hon. Member to the Statement \nI made in the House last Friday, 25 July of this year, wherein I denounced the unpatriotic and \ndisgraceful act of the Opposition which caused the reputation of our country to be sullied. \n\n37 \n \n \nNow, I have already addressed parts (b) and (c) of the question in the Statement that I \nmade at the Sitting of Friday 25 July 2025. \nAs regards part (a) of the question, the delegation comprised hon. Jhummun, hon. Ms \nSavabaddy, hon. Lukeeram, hon. Apollon, and hon. Baboolall.  The total cost incurred \namounted to Rs1,134,471. \nI am informed that the hon. Members will refund the excess per diem that was paid to \nthem as their mission, which was initially scheduled from 16 July to 01 August 2025, lasted \nonly from 18 July to 25 July 2025.  \nMs Savabaddy: Nou pa bann zwiser nou! \nThe Prime Minister: That is how we operate and decide. \nMs Anquetil: Exactly! Exactly! \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, it is worth pointing out that the hon. A. Duval \nbecame Speaker after his predecessor was consigned to the ICU under the false pretext that he \nhad to undergo urgent cardiac treatment. There was a confusion as well. He made a statement \nsaying, ‘I have not resigned. I am well.’ Then, we heard that he is going! God knows what \nhappened! \nOver the 78 days when the hon. Member was Speaker, he realised the feat of chairing \nfour sittings of the National Assembly and undertook three missions over a span of two weeks \nshuttling from India to China and to Armenia. Three missions that cost the cost the taxpayers \nan amount of Rs748,112.  \n(Interruptions) \nMr Assirvaden: To pa honte? To pa honte? \nMs Anquetil: La honte! La honte! \nThe Prime Minister: And this amount… \nMr Assirvaden: To ti enn ti kok, tonn vinn enn ti zwiser! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: This amount of Rs748, … \n(Interruptions) \nMr Assirvaden: Ti zwiser! \n\n38 \n \n \nThe Prime Minister: …Rs748,112, this amount excludes expenses for other members \nof the delegation, that is, only for him. \nAs I indicated, Madam Speaker, in my Statement last Friday, the hon. Quirin has already \nserved two full terms as a member of the national delegation to the Pan-African Parliament, \nthat is, from May 2015 to May 2018, and again from May 2020 to October 2024. \nFor the period 2015 to 2018, he undertook five missions for a total cost of Rs1,112,011.  \nNow, during the period 2019 to 2024, he participated in meetings of the Pan-African \nParliament on ten occasions. \nMs Anquetil: Wow! \nThe Prime Minister: The expenditures incurred for these missions were Rs \n2,723,195.75.  \nThe total expenses for these 15 missions, as a member of the national delegation amount, \nto Rs3,835,206.75. \n I wish to draw the attention of the House to the protocol of the Constitutive Act of the \nAfrican Union relating to the Pan-African Parliament which was adopted in 2014, and I quote \n– \n“The term of a Member of the Pan-African Parliament shall be five years.  He or she shall \nbe eligible for re-election for one further term only.” \nThis clause is currently in the process of ratification.  Had it been ratified, the hon. \nMember would not even have been eligible for that re-election. I am a bit surprised that this \nescaped his attention! \nArticle 4, Madam Speaker, is clear. What does it say? It does not say that Members of \nthe Opposition should be included. It says that it should include a ‘diversity of opinion.’  \nBut I remind the House, we have a diverse coalition here. Four parties plus Members \nfrom Rodrigues. We have diversity of opinion! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Rann kass do! \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \n\n39 \n \n \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, there are many precedence of delegations being told to \n‘al zot lakaz’ because of the way they have been constituted. I will ask the hon. Prime \nMinister…. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Please! \nMr A. Duval: …whether he is prepared to take back the injurious Statement that he has \nmade against the Pan-African Parliament? \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Ey! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: Last Friday on the African Union. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Fausse!  \n(Interruptions) \nAssize do bourik! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: I made the Statement, Madam Speaker, precisely because of the \nunpatriotic way that they have behaved… \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Lâche! \nHon. Members: Shame! Shame! \nThe Prime Minister: …and sullied the reputation of this country. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Hon. Members, … \nMr Bhagwan: Vender!  \nMr Assirvaden: Zwiser! \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, we have gone… \nMr A. Duval: Zot ki zwiser! \n(Interruptions) \n \n\n40 \n \n \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members! \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members, I am trying to speak! We have gone well beyond the time limit for you, \nhon. Prime Minister. So, we are ending here.  \nB/780, B/782 and B/783 have been withdrawn. \nNow, we move to questions addressed to hon. Ministers.  I am calling on the Chief Whip!  \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: I am sorry, I should call you the hon. Second Member for Belle Rose \nand Quatre Bornes because it is in this capacity that you have put the question.  \nGo ahead! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. B/786 ! \nMadam Speaker: Avant la réponse, Monsieur le ministre, permettez-moi de dire tout ce \nqui a été retiré. Let me do that. \nThe Table has been advised that PQ B/796 will be replied by the hon. Minister of \nTourism. PQ B/798 will be replied by the hon. Minister of Housing and Lands. PQ B/805 will \nbe replied by the hon. Minister of Tourism. PQ B/812 will be replied by the hon. Minister of \nLocal Government.  \nNow, hon. Minister! \nBEAU BASSIN-ROSE HILL-EBÈNE – CYCLE NETWORK PROJECT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/779",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 779,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/779) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre D'or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the initiative taken \nby the African Union to launch an African rating agency in September 2025, he will state if he \nproposes to support same.   \nThe Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade (Mr \nD. Ramful): Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. At the outset, I wish to inform the House that \nthe Government of Mauritius fully supports the initiatives taken by the African Union to launch \nan African Credit Rating Agency. \nIn fact, the 28th Ordinary Session of the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of \nthe African Union (AU) held in January 2017 in Addis Ababa adopted a decision directing the \nAfrican Peer Review Mechanism which is a specialised governance entity of the African Union \nto provide support to African Union Member States in the field of rating agencies.  \nConsequently, the 6th Ordinary Session of the African Union Specialized Technical \nCommittee on Finance, Monetary Affairs, Economic Planning and Integration, ministerial \nmeeting held in July 2023 in Nairobi, Kenya, adopted a Declaration endorsing the \nestablishment of a private sector driven Africa Credit rating Agency based on self-funding.  \n\n84 \n \n \nThe establishment of the Africa Credit Rating Agency represents a pivotal initiative \nwhich aims at enhancing financial transparency, credibility and investment attractiveness \nacross the African continent. Realising the critical role of reliable credit ratings in fostering \neconomic growth and stability, the Africa Credit Rating Agency seeks to provide independent \nassessments of credit worthiness tailored for African markets.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, on 09 June 2025, the Mauritian Ambassy in Addis Abeba, \ntransmitted a note verbale from the APRM Continental Secretariat inter alia inviting interested \nAfrican Union Member States to submit an Expression of Interest by the deadline of 30 June \n2025, on country competitiveness as a primary jurisdiction for the registration of Africa Credit \nRating Agency.  \nThe Continental Secretariat of the APRM also encouraged African Union Member States \nto inform Credit Rating Agencies, operating in their respective countries, to formally expressed \ntheir interest for a joint investment for Africa Credit Rating Agency through a potential merger \nacquisition or technical partnership. \nOn the basis of high level of consultations that I held with the Ministry of Finance and \nthe Economic Development Board and pursuant to the call issued by the APRM, the Ministry \nof Financial Services and Economic Planning, submitted on behalf of the Government of \nMauritius, on 30 June 2025, an Expression of Interest to host and register the Africa Credit \nRating Agency as a primary jurisdiction in Mauritius.  \nThe Expression of Interest has been submitted to the Mauritius Commercial Bank Capital \nMarkets, a subsidiary of the Mauritius Commercial Bank that has been appointed by the APRM \nas an independent transaction adviser to facilitate the establishment of the Africa Credit Rating \nAgency as an independent, credible and private sector-driven entity.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the submission of Expression of Interest by Mauritius to host \nthe Africa Credit Rating Agency is testimony of Government’s full commitment to enhance \nthe visibility of the Mauritius International Financial Centre on the African continent. \nTo conclude, in line with our shared commitment to the ideals, principles, and aspirations \nof the African Union, Mauritius thus fully support the establishment of the Africa Credit Rating \nAgency.  \nThank you.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: This was the last question. Time is over.  \n\n85 \n \n \nMadam Speaker will resume the seat.  \nAt this stage, Madam Speaker took the Chair. \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2)",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that all the business on today’s \nOrder Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10. \n The Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nPUBLIC BILLS \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Civil Appeal Bill (No. XXI of 2025) was read a first \ntime.  \nSecond Reading \nTHE FINANCE BILL (No. XVIII of 2025) \n& \nTHE RODRIGUES REGIONAL ASSEMBLY (AMENDMENT) BILL \n(No. XIX of 2025) \n& \nTHE ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL MEASURES (MISCELLANEOUS \nPROVISIONS) BILL (No. XX of 2025) \nOrder read for resuming adjourned debate on the following Bills – \n• \nThe Finance Bill (No. XVIII of 2025);  \n• \nThe Rodrigues Regional Assembly (Amendment) Bill (No. XIX of 2025), and  \n• \nThe Economic and Financial Measures (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill (No. XX of \n2025). \nQuestion again proposed. \n\n86 \n \n \nMadam Speaker: Leader of the Opposition, you have the three Bills and now, you \nhave the floor. \n(4.46 p.m.) \nMr G. Lesjongard (The Leader of the Opposition): Thank you, Madam Speaker.  \nLe 5 juin dernier, c’est-à-dire, 50 jours de cela, le gouvernement de l’Alliance du \nchangement avait présenté son tout premier budget et force est de constater que ceux qui ont \nfait confiance au grand défenseur de la liberté, ont vite déchanté après l’annonce des mesures. \nCes amendements proposés dans ce Finance Bill vont accélérer l’appauvrissement de la \npopulation qui a déjà commencé depuis quelques mois. \nEn cette période hivernale, Madame la présidente, ce gouvernement a jeté un froid parmi \nla population avec ce premier budget qui laisse un goût amer et qui est mal digéré par le peuple. \nJe qualifierai ce Finance Bill comme du ‘pain rassis’ et ‘une tasse de thé sans sucre et sans lait’, \nMadame la présidente. \nEn passant, le sachet de lait se vend aujourd’hui à R 300. \n(Interruptions) \nLe ministre du Commerce devrait revoir le Mark-Up sur ce produit. Certains \nimportateurs… \nMadam Speaker:  Members, he is only at the beginning.  \nMr Lesjongard: … se tapent des millions sur le dos du peuple. Même la paire de dholl \npuri se vend à R 25 à certains endroits. \nAn hon. Member: R 84 millions pour Sona Ori.  \nMr Lesjongard: Madame la présidente, je vais maintenant aborder en détail les divers \nlois clés qui ont été amendées dans ce Finance Bill comme la Companies Act, the Finance and \nAudit Act et l’Income Tax Act.  \nCe Finance Bill vient nous démontrer, encore une fois, qu’il y a un manque de \ncoordination entre ce gouvernement et le service public et je vais citer quelques exemples – la \nmauvaise gestion du dossier du Basic Retirement Pension, le méli-mélo du Fair Share \nContribution et ce gouvernement a présenté des mesures sans prendre en considération leurs \nimpacts sur la population et sur l’économie de notre pays. \n\n87 \n \n \nOn a annoncé l’abolition de la Basic Retirement Pension pour ceux entre 60 et 65 ans \nsans aucune consultation et étude au préalable et après, on vient mettre en place des comités \nministériels qui ont ensuite essayé d’atténuer les effets de cette mesure très impopulaire. Pas \nplus tard que la semaine dernière, deux organisations syndicales étrangères, la branche \nAfricaine de l'International Trade Union Confederation et l’IndustriALL Global Union ont \ndénoncé avec force le fait que ce gouvernement a transgressé la Convention 144 du Bureau \nInternational du Travail dont Maurice est signataire. Cette Convention, Madame la présidente, \nconcerne l’obligation de l’État à avoir des consultations tripartites. Ils dénoncent aussi cette \ndécision unilatérale qui va directement impacter non seulement la vie des travailleurs mais \naussi des pensionnaires de notre pays. Ils demandent tous au gouvernement de respecter cette \nConvention et de faire marche arrière sur le Basic Retirement Pension et d’engager au plus vite \npossible des consultations sur le sujet.  \nQuelle honte pour ceux qui se disent proches des travailleurs et quelle honte pour ce \ngouvernement qui est composé des parties qui se disent être socialistes! \nMadame la présidente, la question qu’il faut se poser cette après-midi est la suivante – \nEst-ce un gouvernement qui travaille pour ou contre le peuple ? \nMême si le Finance Bill comporte certaines propositions positives, les fondamentaux de ce \nprojet de loi et du budget n’ont pas changé et les vulnérables seront les plus touchés.  \nMadam Speaker, I refer to section 39 of the Finance Bill which deals with the National \nPension Act.  \nAprès les débats du premier Finance Bill de ce gouvernement, les membres de l’autre \ncôté la Chambre vont voter en toute conscience l’abolition de la pension de vieillesse pour ceux \nâgés entre 60 à 65 ans.  \nPermettez-moi, Madame la présidente, de faire référence à un extrait de la réponse de la \nPNQ que j’avais posé au ministre de la Sécurité sociale le 8 juillet dernier. Sa réponse démontre \nclairement l’agenda antisocialiste de ce gouvernement et aussi des conseillers au sein de ce \ngouvernement.  \nIl avait dit, je cite – \n“Three proposals for Income Support were put forth to the Inter-Ministerial Committee: \nRs5,000 Income Support, Rs7,500 Income Support, and Rs10,000 Income Support. And \nthe Financial Advisers – I must stress – had recommended the amount of Rs7,500. \n\n88 \n \n \nHowever, Government having heard the people, having heard the difficulties surfaced \nthrough the recent weeks, has decided to provide the sum of Rs10,000 as Income \nSupport.” \nDonc, à en croire certains membres de ce comité interministériel, une personne de 60 ans \npeut vivre avec R 5000 of income support. Selon ses conseillers, qui, aujourd’hui, – il faut le \ndire – touchent plus de R 100,000, une personne âgée de 60 ans peut vivre avec R 7500. \nMadame la présidente, avec l’augmentation du coût de la vie qui est de plus en plus \ninquiétante, l’inflation dans les années à venir, les R10 000 ne suffiront pas. Vous êtes en train \nde forcer les gens, même ceux qui sont malades, à travailler après leurs 60 ans pour pouvoir \nsurvivre.  \nLet me now come to Section 53 which is related to the Social Contribution and the Social \nBenefits Act.  \nLors de son intervention, l’honorable Premier ministre, vendredi dernier, avait affirmé \nceci, je cite – \n“The previous government had planned to end abruptly the different CSG allowances, \nnamely the CSG Income Allowance, the Child Allowance, the School Allowance, the \nMaternity Care Allowance and the Pregnancy Care Allowance. As a compassionate \nGovernment, we are ensuring that the CSG allowances are renewed and gradually phased \nout over the next two years.” \nMadame la présidente, c’est l’ancien gouvernement qui avait mis en place en place ces \nallocations et il n’y avait aucun plan d’enlever ces allocations. Now, if you are really a \ncompassionate Government, then, why are you phasing out the CSG? Quelle contradiction ! \nLa CSG, Madame la présidente, avait sa raison d’être. C’était un système plus juste qui a \npermis au gouvernement de générer des milliards. Avec ces milliards, nous avons non \nseulement augmenté la pension, mais également introduit des allocations, par exemple, qui a \npermis à un citoyen mauricien qui touchait, allons remonter jusqu’à 2014, R 1500 par mois, de \ntoucher graduellement R 20,000 comme revenu aujourd’hui ! Par exemple, le Child Allowance \nétait une mesure réfléchie et sociale et dans un esprit d’alléger le budget d’un couple… \nAn hon. Member: Koz reward money! \nMr Jhummun: Sattar! \nMr Lesjongard: …ayant un projet de fonder une famille. \n\n89 \n \n \nMs Anquetil: Poz PNQ lor reward money! \nMr Lesjongard: Tout comme d’autres allocations qui étaient bénéfiques à la population.  \nDans ce budget, malheureusement, un certain nombre de ces allocations seront soit \nréduites ou éventuellement éliminées. Vous allez encore nous sortir cette fameuse phrase, ‘la \ncaisse vid’! \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members: Pena nanye dan la caisse!  \n(Interruptions) \nMr Bhagwan: Pena mem fonds dan la caisse! \nMr Lesjongard: Mais, aujourd’hui, … \nAn hon. Member: Zot inn pren la caisse la zot inn ale! \nMr Jhummun: Zot inn devid li zot inn ale! \nMr Lesjongard: Aujourd’hui, Madame la présidente, … \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Vous les… \nMr Lesjongard: Pas un seul Mauricien ne croit à votre argument que les caisses sont \nvides ! \n(Interruptions) \nSauf vous au sein de ce gouvernement. \nMr Jhummun: Sonah-Ori ! \nMr Lesjongard: Aujourd’hui, une très grande majorité de la population croit fermement \nque ce gouvernement protège les intérêts de ce qui possède au détriment de la classe moyenne. \n(Interruptions) \nCette politique va malheureusement créer l’écart entre les riches et les pauvres. \nAn hon. Member: Twa ki pe dir sa la? \nAn hon. Member: Sonah-Ori! Sonah-Ori! \n\n90 \n \n \nMr Lesjongard: Car, Madame la présidente, nous savons tous les efforts qui ont été faits \npour diminuer cet écart par l’ancien gouvernement.  \nPour soutenir cet argument, je fais référence au rapport publié par Statistics Mauritius en \nfévrier 2025 sous le titre Poverty Analysis 2023. Ce même bureau de statistiques qui a été très \ncritiqué par l’actuel gouvernement ! Ce rapport confirme – et c’est vérifiable – que pendant ces \ndix dernières années, nous avons grandement progressé dans la lutte contre la pauvreté dans le \npays.  \n(Interruptions) \nEt cela grâce aux allocations et à l’État providence.  \n(Interruptions) \nCe gouvernement sera responsable de l’appauvrissement de la population. \nAn hon. Member: Dix ans, pani nay ba! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard: Madame la présidente, la valeur de la roupie dégringole, les prix des \nproduits flambent, la pension et les allocations sociales disparaissent. Aujourd’hui, les PME \nsont taxées et les intérêts sur les prêts augmentent. Et nous ne sommes qu’au début du mandat \nde ce gouvernement !  \nPendant ce temps, on nous demande, encore et encore, de serrer la ceinture. Mais \njusqu’où devons-nous serrer la ceinture ? \n(Interruptions) \nMs Savabaddy: Ori so kaba pena sintir! \nAn hon. Member: Pena sintir! \nMr Jhummun: Ori so sintir inn kasse! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard: Madame la présidente, les promesses faites dans le manifeste électoral \ndes partis… \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members: Pena sintir! \n\n91 \n \n \nMr Lesjongard: The more they shout, the more I speak louder, Madam Speaker! \nMadam Speaker: No, I… \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard: Les promesse faites dans le manifeste électoral des partis de \ngouvernement pour rétablir le pouvoir d’achat… \nAn hon. Member: Sattar! \nMr Mohamed: To pe krwar seki to pe dir la? \nMr Lesjongard: …ne sont que des illusions.  \nAn hon. Member: Sattar! \nMr Lesjongard: Vous avez tourné le dos au peuple et vous n’êtes plus un gouvernement \ncrédible ! \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members: Assez ! \nMr Jhummun:  Twa ki credible? \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard: Je vais maintenant commenter la clause 4 du Finance Bill. \n(Interruptions) \nDr. Aumeer: 60-0 pe dir twa ! \nMr Lesjongard: La Banking Act ainsi que the Bills of Exchange Act sont en train d’être \namendés pour, je pense, améliorer le marché d’échanges. Ce gouvernement avait critiqué la \npolitique de l’ancien régime à ce sujet. \n(Interruptions) \nMr Jhummun: Avec raison ! Avec raison ! \nMr Lesjongard: Depuis leur prise de pouvoir, il y a eu cinq interventions de la Banque \nde Maurice sur le marché d’échanges pour un total de 70 millions de dollars. \nAn hon. Member: Devaliz la Banque Maurice ! \n\n92 \n \n \nMr Lesjongard: Et les résultats, le dollar ne cesse de grimper et l’euro est aujourd’hui à \nR 53, Madame la présidente. Chiffres record sous ce gouvernement. L’impact sur l’importation \nsera terrible et l’effet cascade sur les prix de nos supermarchés se fait déjà sentir.  \nConcernant le secteur de la construction, la situation actuelle est très difficile. Difficile \npour un secteur qui est passé pendant dix ans par deux lockdown et qu’ils ont survécu.  \nMais, c’est un secteur qui aussi a eu une croissance de l’ordre de 28 %, Madame la \nprésidente. \nAujourd’hui, ce secteur est aux abois de par les mesures annoncées dans le budget et ne \ntardera à licencier des employés. À la clause 7(3) du Finance Bill qui concerne le grading of \ncontractors, le gouvernement décide de revenir à l’ancien système de grading des compagnies \nde construction. Ce système avait été revu et les contracteurs classés en trois catégories. Cela \nafin de permettre aux petits contracteurs d’avoir accès à des gros projets. Aujourd’hui, à cause \nde leur chiffre d’affaires et avec cet amendement, ces compagnies seront condamnées, si je \npeux utiliser ce terme, à tal lame à des gros contracteurs. Avec ce budget, ces mêmes gros \nopérateurs sont dans l’inquiétude vu l’absence d’investissement dans des gros chantiers pour \nles prochaines années à venir. \nLa grande réforme de l’amélioration du trafic routier prévoyait plus d’accessibilité grâce \nà un réseau routier moderne et un système moderne de transport en commun. Qu’est-ce que le \nFinance Bill vient nous proposer pour diminuer le trafic routier : pas d’extension du métro, \ndeux projets de routes qui seront mis en chantier dans trois ans et pour faire simple, rendre les \nvoitures inaccessibles aux Mauriciens en augmentant la taxe sur les voitures. \nJe viens maintenant à notre secteur touristique et la question est : est-ce que ce \ngouvernement a une vision pour ce secteur ? Ce qu’on veut savoir de ce gouvernement est : \nquelle est la stratégie pour nous rendre plus compétitif vis-à-vis des pays comme les Seychelles \net les Maldives ? L’introduction du tourist fee à clause 58 du Finance Bill va obliger les \ndirecteurs de tourist accommodation respectives à verser un tourist fee par nuitée pour chaque \ntouriste ayant séjourné chez lui en euro, s’il vous plaît, chaque mois à la MRA. Pour les gros \nopérateurs, ce ne sera sans doute pas un souci parce qu’ils ont les moyens mais qu’en est-il aux \npetits opérateurs ? Pourquoi ne pas prélever ces sommes directement à leur arrivée. Le système \nde paiement préconisé dans le Finance Bill va définitivement promouvoir des magouilles. \nCertains opérateurs touristiques vont collecter le tourist fee et vont peut-être déclarer moins et \ndans la pratique ce sera difficile pour la MRA de vérifier les comptes. \n\n93 \n \n \nAnd to add insult to injury, Madame la présidente, comme si cela n’était pas suffisant \nd’augmenter les prix des billets d’avion entre Maurice et Rodrigues, cette fois comme mesure \nde redressement et de changement, que propose le Finance Bill à la clause 12 ? On va amender \nla Customs Tariff Act pour que tous ceux qui voyagent entre Maurice et Rodrigues paient la \nVAT sur les produits achetés dans les magasins Duty Free. \nEt maintenant, j’en viens au Fair Share Contribution. Dans le discours du budget, le \nPremier ministre avait annoncé une taxe de 10 % pour ceux qui touchent entre R 12 et R 24 \nmillions par an et 20 % pour ceux qui touchent plus que R 24 millions par an, et comme par \nmagie cette partie du discours du budget avait disparu quelques heures plus tard et aujourd’hui, \nc’est une Fair Share Contribution unilatérale de 15 % pour ceux qui touchent plus de R 12 \nmillions annuellement soit une hausse de 5 % pour une catégorie et une baisse de 5 % pour une \nautre catégorie. Pourquoi ce changement ? Qu’est-ce qui ou plutôt qui a influencé cette \ndécision ? Je laisse la population en juger par elle-même. \nMadame Speaker, previously this tax was known under a different name, that is, the \nSolidarity Income Tax and was repealed in January 2012 and the tax rate applicable was 10%. \nThe Fair Share Contribution would include dividends received from a resident company and/or \na cooperative society while dividends as item 1 of Sub-Part B of the Second Schedule of the \nIncome Tax Act is exempt and I expect Prime Minister to clarify this inconsistency when he \nintervenes later. There is also, Madam Speaker, a possibility of double taxation as dividend is \nderived from profit of the company which is subject to tax at 15%. Under the Fair Share \nContribution, the same dividend is being taxed, now, in the hands of the shareholder. \nNow with regard to companies, the introduction for Fair Share Contribution for \ncompanies having chargeable income of more than Rs20 million, 5% applies to domestic \ncompanies and 2% to export companies and their Fair Share Contribution is to be paid in VAT \nreturns on a quarterly basis. It will be an additional burden. It would have been much simpler \nto handle the Fair Share Contribution for those companies under the Advance Payment System \nof the income tax rather than declaring it in the VAT returns, Madam Speaker. \nWith regard to PART XIID, dealing with financial assistance, I believe that this fiscal \npolicy may have negative social implications or disproportionately affect certain group of \npeople and I consider this measure also as an antisocial measure. \nI now refer to Section 150G which deals with the Housing Loan Relief Scheme. The \ndecrease in the Housing Loan Relief Scheme could significantly impact low to medium income \n\n94 \n \n \nfamilies who very often rely on such programmes for home ownership. This change will no \ndoubt exacerbate housing affordability issues and make it more challenging for these groups to \nsecure financing and achieve stable housing, Madam Speaker.  \nWhen one takes a closer look at the new tax rate, and this is important, for example, \nindividuals earning over Rs1 million will now automatically be placed in the 20% tax bracket. \nUnder the previous tax structure, the 20% rate applied only to those with income not exceeding \nRs2,390,000. This measure, and mark my words, will again affect the middle class, rendering \nthem more vulnerable and contributing to their financial decline, Madam Speaker. \nLet me now come to section 61, concerning Value Added Tax. Madam Speaker, \nbusinesses with a turnover of taxable supplies amounting to Rs3 million are now required to \napply for compulsory VAT registration, whereas the previous threshold was Rs6 million. I have \nsaid it and I say it again, this measure will negatively impact on businesses and in the majority \nof cases, that burden will be passed over to consumers.  \nPendant que la colère gronde et qu’il n’est plus apparent pour qui roule ce gouvernement, \non va amender la Consumer Protection Act. Pour quoi faire ? Pour permettre de veiller sur les \nachats en ligne. C’est un pas en avant de légiférer les online transactions sur les réseaux \nsociaux, mais je pense qu’il faudrait rendre obligatoire l’enregistrement de tous les opérateurs \nou individus qui font de la vente en ligne. Et j’attire l’attention de la Chambre que par exemple, \nconcernant la vente en ligne des suppléments médicaux ou alimentaires, aujourd’hui il n’y a \naucun contrôle. \nMadam Speaker, let me now come to section 50P concerning Qualified Domestic \nMinimum Top-up Tax (QDMT Tax). A Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-up Tax is being \nimposed on a resident parent or subsidiary of a large multinational enterprise to raise their \neffective tax rate to 15%. The OECD has developed the Global Anti-Base Erosion Rules \n(GloBE) to ensure that Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) having annual consolidated revenue \nof 750 million euros or more, are taxed on their global income at a minimum rate of 15%. If a \nresident subsidiary of such Multinational Enterprises is being taxed at an effective rate of less \nthan 15% in a jurisdiction, the application of the GloBE Rules will imply that another tax \njurisdiction – usually the jurisdiction where the multinational is headquartered – will collect \nthe difference in tax.  \nThe QDMT is going to adversely impact on the attractiveness and competitiveness of the \nMauritius International Financial Centre. It will also create frustrations among international \n\n95 \n \n \nfinancial centres, while at the same time, distort, I believe, diplomatic ties and bilateral \nrelationships between Mauritius and countries in Europe where most of those Multinational \nEnterprises come from. The QDMT, as a disincentive, will hinder the relocation of MNEs \nheadquartering and various other offshore structures in Mauritius and there is significant risk \nof many existing offshore corporate structures exiting Mauritius towards a more attractive \ninternational financial centre such as for example, Dubai or Singapore. \nMadame la présidente, permettez-moi de terminer sur cette note. Le Finance Bill sera \nmalheureusement voté et les mesures budgétaires seront mises en place. Je ne vais pas retourner \nsur les effets de ces mesures sur la population dans son ensemble. S’il y a une chose – et je \npèse mes mots quand je le dis – que la population doit prendre en considération, c’est que ce \nprojet confirme le démantèlement de l’Etat providence dans notre pays. \nAn hon. Member: Akoz zot inn kokin!  \nMr Lesjongard: Madame la présidente, un vote en faveur de ce texte de loi va graver les \nnoms de ceux qui ont voté pour, comme ceux qui ont arraché la pension des mains d’honnêtes \ntravailleurs et qui va plonger la classe moyenne et les plus vulnérables dans une profonde \npauvreté. Vous allez condamner des centaines de milliers de familles mauriciennes à vivre dans \nl’endettement et la précarité pendant votre mandat et j’espère… \nMadam Speaker: Pas moi ! \nMr Lesjongard: J’ai le souhait que vous allez en prendre conscience rapidement et revoir \ncertaines de ces décisions. \nJ’en ai terminé, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Merci. Merci beaucoup, hon. Leader of the Opposition.  \nHon. Minister of Labour! \n(4.28 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations (Mr R. Uteem): Madam Speaker, \nbefore answering to the hon. Leader of the Opposition, may I start by commending the hon. \nPrime Minister today, for doing away with the practice that was established by the MSM \nGovernment, which is to lump all type of legislation in the Finance Bill, and that went against \nthe ruling delivered by the late hon. Kailash Purryag on 21 July 2009. And I think it is worth \nreminding what he said – \n\n96 \n \n \n“In the light of the foregoing principles and practices, I rule that the Finance \n(Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill should not contain provisions intended to make \npermanent changes in existing laws unless they are essentially connected with national \nfinance, or, are consequential upon, or incidental to the taxation proposals and may also \ninclude provisions that are sufficiently closely related to those matters within the spirit \nand scope of the Bill as defined in the long title.” \nAnd this is why today, we have a Finance Bill which deals with all financial measures \nannounced in the budget and then we have another Miscellaneous Provision Bill. The MSM \ndid the contrary and as a result, I remember – and the hon. Leader of the Opposition was in \nCabinet then – we used to have Finance Bill amending 90+ legislations in 300 pages long \ndocument, which no one read most of the time, only to find out that surreptitiously, certain \namendments had been proposed and voted and not sufficiently debated in this House. So, we \nare doing away with this practice, Madam Speaker, and that is welcomed. \nL'honorable leader de l’Opposition parle d’appauvrissement de la population. Où étiez-\nvous lorsque votre gouvernement a donné R 89 millions à Madame Sonah-Ori? Ça ce n’est pas \nl’appauvrissement ? Quand votre gouvernement a donné plus de R 150 millions à M. Hajee \nAbdoula, ça ce n’était pas l’appauvrissement de la population ? Les millions donnés à \nMaradiva, pas d’appauvrissement ? \nHon. Members: Milliards! \nMr Uteem: Les milliards donnés… \n(Interruptions) \n…à ceux qui sont tout autour, qui ont bénéficié du MIC et les R 160 millions de reward money. \nDonc, vous êtes très mal placé, M. l’honorable leader de l’opposition pour parler de \nl’appauvrissement de la population. \nVous parlez des changements qu’on a effectués suite au budget. A l’annonce du budget, \non a mis sur pied deux comités. Oui, effectivement on a écouté, on a trouvé qu’il y a certaines \npersonnes qui sont les plus vulnérables – \n• \nles femmes au foyer ; \n• \nles personnes qui ont travaillé trop dure dans la vie ; \n• \nles gens qui touchent moins de R 10 000, et \n\n97 \n \n \n• \nles familles qui touchent moins de R 20 000. \nEt on a fait un effort. On a fait un effort et on va leur donner un special allowance de R 10 000. \nQu’y a-t-il de méchant dedans ? Pourquoi prenez-vous objection à cela?  \nBien sûr si demain on a les moyens de faire plus, on va faire plus, mais aujourd’hui vous \navez laissé les caisses vides. Pourquoi dites-vous que les caisses n’étaient pas vides?  \nPeut-être que je dois vous rafraîchir la mémoire et vous dire ce que votre propre ministre \navait annoncé dans cette Chambre. \nAn hon. Member: Savat dodo? \nMr Uteem: Le ministre Savat dodo, le ministre des Finances, en réponse à une question \nparlementaire du 24 octobre 2023, je cite – \n« M. le président, le montant total déboursé pour le paiement de ces prestations est \nd'environ R 25 milliards. Il ne reste donc rien par rapport aux contributions de la CSG. » \nJe le redis – \n« Il ne reste donc rien (…). » \nQuand il ne reste rien, cela veut dire que la caisse est vide ! \n(Interruptions) \nVotre propre ministre des Finances a dit, qu’il a tout balayé. Tout pris !  \nMr Juman: Pena la caisse! \nMr Uteem: Les R 25 milliards qu’il a ponctionnés des salariés sous la Contribution \nsociale généralisée… \nMr Jhummun: La caisse nay ba! \nMr Uteem: …il a tout balayé! C’est pourquoi on vient dire que la caisse est vide. Et, \naujourd’hui, vous avez l’audace une fois de plus de remettre en question le fait que la caisse \nn’est plus vide. \nQuand les autres parlent du fait qu’il n’y a plus de caisse, c’est parce que quand le Premier \nministre avait répondu aux questions, il a montré que ce n’étaient pas R 25 milliards qui avaient \nété dépensés, c’est aussi R 3,3 milliards et R 7 milliards en plus. C’est-à-dire un total de R 10,2 \nmilliards en plus de la CSG qui n’avait plus rien. Donc, vous avez pris la caisse aussi et vous \nêtes partis avec. \n\n98 \n \n \nMadame la présidente, le leader de l’opposition nous parle de Fair Share Contribution \net il nous dit qu’on avait annoncé dans le budget qu’il y aura une contribution de 10 % pour \nceux qui touchent entre R 12 millions et R 24 millions, alors que ceux qui touchent plus de R \n24 millions auront à payer 20 %. C’est vrai, c’était dans le discours budgétaire. Mais ce qu’il \nne dit pas, c’est qu’au paragraphe 272, il est écrit, et je cite – \n“272. A high-income earner, earning annual net income exceeding Rs 12 million, \ninclusive of dividend income, will be required to pay a Fair Share Contribution at the rate \nof 15 percent of his chargeable income (…).” \n \nDonc, c’était déjà annoncé que ce sera 15%. Oui, il y avait une contradiction. Ailleurs, \nc’était 10 % et 20 %, mais on ne change pas les règles du jeu. On vient juste clarifier ce qui a \nété déjà dit au paragraphe 272 du discours budgétaire. \nLe leader de l’opposition nous dit qu’on va taxer deux fois les dividendes. Mais, là aussi, \nil a la mémoire courte. Lorsqu’il était dans le gouvernement en 2022 et lorsque le gouvernement \nd’alors avait introduit la Solidarity Levy, la Solidarity Levy incluait les dividendes. Si c’était \nplus de R 3 millions, vous deviez payer la Solidarity Levy de 15 % en plus sur les dividendes. \nQu’est-ce qu’ils ont fait une année plus tard, en 2023 ? Sous pression du gros capital, ils ont \naboli la Solidarity Levy. Et, aujourd’hui, quand on met un Fair Share Contribution, ils nous \npointent du doigt et ils nous disent qu’on est en train de protéger les riches ? Alors qu’en 2023, \nl’ancien gouvernement avait aboli la Solidarity Levy. \nLe leader de l’opposition nous parle de la stratégie qu’on a pour le secteur touristique. Je \nne vais pas répondre à la place de l’honorable ministre du Tourisme, mais comme tout le \nmonde, tous les Mauriciens ont lu dans les journaux aujourd’hui que l’arrivée touristique du \n1er janvier 2025 au 15 juillet 2025 s’élevait à 722 184 touristes, alors que pour la même période, \nl’année dernière, c’était 700 880. Donc, comparé à votre gouvernement, notre gouvernement \nest en train d’augmenter le nombre d’arrivées touristiques. Donc, pourquoi vous dites qu’on \nest en train de tuer le secteur et quelle est notre stratégie touristique ? En tout cas, c’est ‘une \nstratégie’ qui marche parce qu’on a plus de touristes aujourd’hui qu’on avait sous votre \ngouvernement. \n(Interruptions) \nMadame la présidente, sur le sujet de l’income tax, je dois vous dire que le leader de \nl’opposition est un peu confus parce que, d’une part, il nous dit qu’on ne taxe pas suffisamment \nles riches, qu’on fait la part des choses pour les riches. Et puis, dans la même phrase, il nous \n\n99 \n \n \ndit : ‘Ah, vous êtes en train de tuer la classe moyenne. Vous êtes en train d’imposer trop de \ntaxes à la classe moyenne.’ \nMr Jhummun: Pa’nn konpran nanye! \nMr Uteem: Comme l’avait dit l’honorable Premier ministre la dernière fois, vous ne \npouvez pas tout avoir. Je ne vais pas reprendre l’expression qu’il avait dite avec la crémaillère, \nmais il faut faire un choix. Il faut faire un choix dans la vie. \nLe choix qu’on a fait, Madame la présidente, et c’est bon de le rappeler, se trouve à la \npage 54 du discours budgétaire au paragraphe 295 – \n“(…) raising the tax exemption threshold by Rs 110,000, that is, by 28 percent. \n(…) removing 44,000 individuals from the tax net.” \n44,000 personnes qui payaient la taxe, sous le gouvernement MSM, ne payent plus la taxe sous \nce gouvernement. \n“(…) 75,000 individuals earning between Rs 500,000 and Rs 1 million in a year will \nactually be paying less income tax; and  \nAs a result of the measures I have introduced, 81 percent of employees in our country \nwill not pay any income tax.” \nC’est cela la réforme fiscale : exonérer un maximum de personnes. 80 % des travailleurs \nde ce pays ne vont pas payer la taxe et ceux qui ont les moyens, ceux qui touchent plus de R \n12 millions par an, ça va être imposable, 15 % additionnel à partir des R 12 millions. Donc, \nmoi, j’ai absolument aucun problème avec la fiscalité. Au contraire, je pense que c’est une très \nbonne chose pour les personnes au bas de l’échelle en termes de fiscalité. \nL’honorable leader de l’opposition n’a pas parlé du Fair Share Contribution concernant \nles entreprises, mais il est de mon devoir de faire le ressortir parce qu’il y avait eu tellement \nd’articles négatifs dans la presse et sur les réseaux sociaux à l’effet que soi-disant le \ngouvernement était en train de revoir sa copie pour favoriser les entreprises. Que nenni, \nMadame la présidente. Jamais ! On n’a pas touché au Fair Share Contribution que vont payer \nles entreprises, les compagnies. Ils continueront à payer ce qui a été annoncé dans le budget, \njusqu’à 5 % pour les compagnies qui touchent plus de R 24 millions.  \nLa seule clarification qu’on a faite, c’est concernant les banques. On a clarifié que le \nmontant maximum que les banques vont payer – parce qu’elles payent aussi d’autres taxes et \n\n100 \n \n \npas que le Fair Share Contribution – c’est 35 % sur le bénéfice qu’elles font avec les \ntransactions de domestic banking. C’est tout. C’est le seul changement qu’on ait fait par rapport \nà ce qui a été dit dans le budget. Cela a été fait pour clarifier. Aucun backpedalling, aucun \nretournement de veste malgré la campagne mensongère qui a été en dehors de cette Chambre. \nMadame la présidente, j’ai souri parce que je m’attendais à ce que le leader de \nl’opposition, visiblement mal renseigné… \nMr Etwareea: Il est dépassé ! \nMr Uteem: …tombe dans le piège du Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-up Tax. \nMr Etwareea: Il ne comprend pas ! \nMr Uteem: Non, il crie au scandale, la fin de notre secteur offshore. Grand défenseur du \nsecteur financier ! Mais ce qu’il ne dit pas, Madame la présidente, c’est quand il était au \nCabinet, le ministre des Finances dans le Finance Bill de 2022, qu’est-ce qu’ils ont fait ? Ils \nont, en 2022, déjà introduit dans le Income Tax Act, la notion de qualified domestic minimum \ntop-up tax. Ils avaient déjà parlé de Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules developed by \nOECD.  Donc, aujourd’hui, ce qu’on est en train de promulguer, c’est un concept qu’ils avaient \ndéjà mis dans la loi, dans le Income Tax Act, depuis 2022, et pourquoi l’ont-ils fait ? Parce \nqu’on est sous pression des organisations internationaux : l’OCDE, le G20, qui forcent à tous \nles pays d’avoir un minimum de 15 % – qu’est-ce que cela veut dire ?  \nÀ Maurice, le taux général est de 15 %, mais il y a plusieurs pays et il y a plusieurs \nentreprises qui paient moins de 15 %, par exemple : les global business companies, certains \nd’entre eux paient seulement 3 %. Donc, avec cette loi qui a été adoptée par plusieurs pays, \nnotamment l’Afrique du Sud, l’Angleterre, si vous avez une multinationale sud-africaine, par \nexemple, qui investit à Maurice et qui paie seulement 3 % de taxe, et bien, en Afrique du Sud, \nelle va payer 12 %. Donc, nous, à Maurice, on a un manque à gagner de 12 % de taxe parce \nque sous cette convention qu’on appelle le Pillar Two, le pays d’origine va taxer la différence \nentre 15 % et le montant qu’il paie à Maurice.  \nDonc, pourquoi renier notre souveraineté sur des 12 % de taxe ? Pourquoi les donner à \nl’Afrique du Sud ? C’est cela que cette loi vienne dire : c’est que maintenant on pourra, à \nMaurice – dans les cas exceptionnels des multinationales qui ont un chiffre d’affaires de 650 \nmillions d’euros – les taxer jusqu’à 15 %. Bien sûr, on a écouté ce que le secteur financier nous \na dit mais dans le projet de loi lui-même, comme l’a si bien expliqué l’honorable Premier \n\n101 \n \n \nministre lorsqu’il a introduit ce projet de loi, on a dit qu’à travers des regulations on pourra \nexonérer certaines entreprises.  \nOn a dit qu’à travers des regulations on pourra avoir des mesures pour contrecarrer l’effet \nque cette taxe d’un minimum de 15 % aura sur les entreprises. On est conscient et on a eu des \ndiscussions avec les capitaines de l’industrie. On s’est assis, on a parlé, et avant de passer le \nprojet de loi, ils ont dit qu’ils sont d’accord. Ils sont d’accord, il y a un dialogue, ils vont parler \navec le ministre des Secteurs financiers, ils vont parler avec le Junior Minister des Finances et \nà travers des regulations, s’il y a lieu d’exonérer certaines sociétés de cette taxe minimum, on \nle fera. Madame la présidente, je crois que j’ai répondu à la plupart des points soulevés par \nl’honorable leader de l’opposition.  \nJ’aimerais juste faire un dernier point sur quelque chose qui est dans le Finance Bill mais \nque, malheureusement, le Premier ministre, il y avait tellement de choses à dire, n’a peut-être \npas assez mis l’accent dessus. Je veux en parler parce que c’est quelque chose qui nous tient, \nau sein d’un gouvernement, très à cœur. Vous vous souviendrez, Madame la présidente, que \nceux qui bénéficient d’une pension : qui sont en retraite ou bien qui ont un handicap, des \nveuves, des orphelins, cette pension est automatiquement coupée s’ils passent plus de six mois \nen dehors de Maurice. Et dans le discours budgétaire, le Premier ministre a déjà annoncé que \ncette règle ne s’appliquera plus dans les cas des personnes qui suivent des traitements à \nl’étranger.  \nMais après l’annonce de cette mesure budgétaire, on a reçu des représentations de la part \ndes personnes qui reçoivent une allocation. En particulier, il y a une personne qui est aveugle, \nqui est une fille et parce qu’elle est en train de poursuivre ses études à l’étranger, en France, \nelle ne peut pas être physiquement à Maurice. Et malheureusement, les autorités ont appliqué \nla loi et ont décidé de lui réclamer la différence de toutes les contributions qui lui ont été faites \npar le ministère de la Sécurité sociale alors qu’elle étudiait à l’étranger. Donc, elle s’est dit ce \nn’est pas possible!  \nAs a caring Government, le Premier ministre est venu maintenant dans le Finance Bill \navec une provision : non seulement les personnes qui sont à l’étranger pour des raisons \nmédicales mais aussi celles qui sont en train d’étudier à l’étranger, à elles aussi on ne leur \ncoupera pas leur pension si elles ne sont pas à Maurice pour plus de six mois. Et on est allé \nencore plus loin, et on a dit que pour avoir un peu plus de flexibilité, on va permettre à celles, \nfor good cause shown, une fois ; on ne va pas appliquer la règle si elles viennent nous prouver, \n\n102 \n \n \ngood cause shown, pourquoi elles n’ont pas pu rester plus de six mois à Maurice – donc, for a \none-off. Et moi, je pense que cette mesure méritait d’être soulignée. \n Avec ceci, Madame la présidente, I commend the Bill to the House. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nHon. Members, I think we can have a break now for tea and we will come back in 30 \nminutes. \nAt 4.48 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.34 p.m., with Madam Speaker in the Chair.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues, Mr Edouard. The floor is \nyours.  \n(5.34. p.m.) \nMr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues): Thank you, Madam Speaker. Thank \nyou for giving me the floor to intervene for the first time on the Finance Bill.  \nWith your permission, Madam Speaker, I will comment on some Acts that will be \namended in the Finance Bill, together with the amendments proposed to the Rodrigues \nRegional Assembly Act. \nWe have been warned of the technicalities of these amendments. So, I will try to be \ncautious. I will try my utmost best not to be out of subject. I will comment on some of these \namendments from a layman perspective before coming to the Rodrigues Regional Assembly \nAct.  \nFirst, the Construction Industry Authority Act. The amendment in connection with \ngovernment-owned companies; I think it is important. You know, contrary to popular \nperception, when properly managed, government-owned companies help a lot in saving money \nand creating jobs.  The new grading of contractors gives better opportunities to small \ncontractors who are otherwise swallowed by large contractors. It might be a good thing for \nRodrigues’ contractors indeed. \nWe also note the amendments to the Consumer Protection Act, Consumer Protection \n(Price and Supplies Control) Act, Essential Commodities Act, Fair Trading Act, Higher \nPurchase and Credit Sale Act and these amendments are most welcomed. Empowering \nauthorised officers will no doubt ensure better control of the widespread abuses we are now \n\n103 \n \n \nwitnessing and this will benefit consumers. The amendment in connection with online \ntransactions is also very important and maybe more control is needed. So many scammers, fake \ntraders and fake goods are up there.  \nBefore taking the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act, I would like to say one word about \nthe National Savings Fund Act. I think there is some confusion about the retirement age of \nemployees. I have seen in the press, some are saying that with the amendment, an employee \nwill no longer be able to retire at the age of 60 or before. I don’t know if I have missed \nsomething. I understand that with the amendment, section 2 (b) (ia), is now, I quote – \n“in respect of a person aged 60 or more, retirement, or otherwise ceasing to work, on or \nbefore [the pension age].” \nPerhaps this needs more clarification because you know the BRP was previously known \nas the Old Age Pension. When it has become the Basic Retirement Pension, it is being confused \nwith the retirement pension of employees. So, maybe the confusion is there. I don’t know, \nmaybe this needs clarification. \nMadam Speaker: I am sorry. One is contributory and the other one is not.  \nMr Edouard: Yes.  \nMadam Speaker: One is universal, the other one is contributory.  \nMr Edouard: Yes.  \nMadam Speaker: If I may.  \nMr Edouard: Madame la présidente, maintenant je viens au Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly Act. Avec cette loi qui consacre l’autonomie de Rodrigues, une nouvelle relation a \nété introduite dans la république; une relation de partenariat qui s’élève des spécificités d’une \npartie de la république. \nMadame la présidente, c’est dans l’exercice de la gestion qu’on acquiert la maturité. \nRectifier le tir, se donner le moyen pour atteindre les objectifs fixés fait partie de la normalité \nqu’on a la responsabilité de gouverner. Parfois cela ne va pas sans souffrance et humiliation. \nMadame la présidente, certains à Rodrigues font preuve de démagogie en faisant croire \nque les amendements proposés par l’honorable Premier ministre portent atteint à l’autonomie ; \ntout en imputant cette soi-disant atteinte à l’autonomie aux actuels gouvernants régionaux. \nComme l’a souligné l’honorable Premier ministre, ces amendements interviennent dans le \n\n104 \n \n \ncadre de la réintroduction du PBB (Performance Based Budgeting) pour que Rodrigues soit \naligné sur l’amendement de la Finance and Audit Act, voté le 18 mars dernier. \nMadam Speaker, the present Rodrigues Regional Assembly (Amendment) Bill has the \nsame Explanatory Memorandum as the Finance and Audit (Amendment) Bill of March 2025; \nto provide for, I quote – \n“(a)  the introduction of Performance-Based Budgeting (PBB) so as to – \n(i) \nlink funds with results and outcomes, and improve operational efficiency in \nthe administration of Rodrigues; and \n(ii) \nenforce greater fiscal responsibility, accountability and transparency; \n(b) \nthe preparation of estimates of expenditure based on programmes \n \nand sub-programmes on a 3-fiscal year rolling basis, specifying the resources \nto be allocated, the outcomes to be achieved and outputs to be delivered.” \nMadame la présidente, on se rappellera que ce n’est pas la première fois qu’un tel \namendement est apporté à la Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act et c’était justement pour \nintroduire le Programme-Based Budgeting en 2009, un concept introduit sous l’actuel Premier \nministre, le PBB qui a été abandonné après et qui a été réintroduit cette année. \nMadam Speaker, the Additional Stimulus Package (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill (No. \nI of 2009), made provision for the introduction of the PBB in Rodrigues in 2010 and this \nrequired an amendment to the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act.  \nWe can read in the Hansard, Debate of 07 April 2009, I quote – \n“The draft amendments to the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act have received the \nconcurrence of the RRA in accordance with Section 75E of the Constitution. A certificate \nto that effect from the Chairperson of the RRA addressed to the hon. Speaker has been \nlaid on the Table of the National Assembly on 31 March 2009.” \nMadam Speaker, I wish to thank the hon. Prime Minister for consulting the Executive \nCouncil of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly, which he said is agreeable to the amendments. \nThe hon. Prime Minister did it though he had no obligation to do so. If my reading is correct \nas far as section 75E of the Constitution is concerned and the fact that he has the majority to \ngo without.  \n\n105 \n \n \nI think PBB is maybe the best thing to do. It focuses on results, on activities completed \nand benefits for end users. Fundings are allocated based on predetermined results related to \nspecific objectives. Progressive measure to demonstrate proper goals are being met. It is \nimportant to know how government policies translate into spending. It is about transparency, \naccountability, efficiency and effectiveness. Wastes must be eliminated. We must ensure that \nfunds are allocated to programmes that deliver value for money. \nMadame la présidente, le PBB appelle à la responsabilité et à la transparence. La \ntransparence accroit la confiance du public en s’assurant des résultats tangibles.  \nCes amendements arrivent dans un contexte bien précis. I think that it is imputing motives \nto the hon. Prime Minister; motives that are unwarranted to think these amendments have other \nobjectives than to introduce the PBB. Ces amendements, Madame la présidente, en appellent \ncertainement d’autres pour éliminer les obstacles qui sabotent l’implementing capacity de \nRodrigues et influencent les résultats.  \nCeci n’étant peut-être pas le forum approprié, nous aurons certes l’occasion d’y revenir. \nJe ne vais pas être plus long, Madame la présidente. Mes chers collègues, je vous remercie. \nMadam Speaker: Merci.  \nHon. Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue! \n(5.45 p.m.) \nMr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne Longue): Thank \nyou, Madam Speaker. Madam Speaker, this must be the first time I think in the parliamentary \nhistory that the Finance Bill is being introduced in such haste. \nHon. Members: Ein? \nMr A. Duval: Such haste between the moment it is introduced to the House, only one \nweek’s notice to amend no less than 60 pieces of legislations. \n(Interruptions) \nOf course, you will no doubt note haste because important documents, including the \nexplanatory notes and existing legal provisions, were only furnished to the House on 25 July, \na few days ago. You may know, Madam Speaker, that for previous Finance Bills, including the \nlast one, at least 12 days were given to hon. Members to study it together with the \naccompanying documents. \n\n106 \n \n \nTo make matters worse, Madam Speaker, this Finance Bill is riddled with errors. \nNumerous provisions do not even tally with the explanatory notes. I will come to them. It is an \ninescapable sign of the amateurism that has plagued this entire budgetary exercise. Even more, \nMadam Speaker, the Budget Speech, as read by the hon. Prime Minister on Budget Day, differs \nmaterially from the actual content of the Finance Bill on several key issues.  \nIt begs the question: who prepared the Finance Bill? I will ask: Are these the so-called \nSenior Advisers that have seen their pay rise from Rs90,000 to now a staggering Rs230,000, \nplus 25% gratuity, amounting to Rs287,000 a month? Are they the ones who have prepared it? \n(Interruptions) \nIf they have, they should be let go! \n(Interruptions) \nThe very spirit, Madam Speaker, of reading a Budget Speech… \nMr Jhummun: To pe insilte lintelizans banla! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: …to the nation is to bring hope to showcase well thought, coherent policy \nto inspire confidence. Instead, this budget and this Finance Bill have done the opposite. They \nhave generated confusion, contradiction and uncertainty. Take, for example, clause 29 of the \nFinance Bill. We talk of property taxes on foreign investors. The initial policy regarding foreign \ninvestment, as it was read in the Budget Speech and as it was contained in the Annexes, was \nfar worse than what was actually made out in the Finance Bill. \nI had myself raised the alarm over the introduction of a 30% capital gain tax on the \ntransfer of residential property to non-citizens which is found on page 42 of the Annex, at \nparagraph 23 (b)(iii) in addition to the doubling of land transfer tax and registration duty for \npromoters and foreign buyers. These measures were to come into force immediately upon the \npublication of the Finance Act without any transition period – a reckless move to destabilise \nthe property market overnight. There were countless number of applications, hundreds on the \ndesk of the EDB waiting for approval. Applications where commitments were already done, \nand these persons were now made to accept such horrendous increases overnight. \nAn hon. Member: Check your facts! \n\n107 \n \n \nMr A. Duval: I checked my facts because they were to take effect as from publication of \nthe Gazette. This is how it was read in the Annex. \n(Interruptions) \nI stated the relevant paragraph; I invite hon. Members to go and read it. So, they were to \ncome immediately upon the publication of the Finance Act. So, we scared away investors. We \ndetailed a hostile policy to foreign investment. We stated, ‘We will tax you. We will introduce \ncapital gains as a record 30%. We do not care if your application has sat for 8-9 months on the \nEDB’s desk. You are also going to be made to foot the Bill.’ That is what was stated. \nFortunately, it has been changed. But it is the first time that a budgetary exercise, instead of \npromoting a reasoned fiscal policy and measures that tie the nation together, had, in fact, the \ncontrary effect. It is a good thing then that the Government has backtracked on this. It is a good \nthing that the capital gains have been scrapped and are no longer part of Clause 29. And it is a \ngood thing that a one-year moratorium has been given to those persons. \nA one-year moratorium has been given under Clause 29. It takes effect as from 01 July \n2026, and not as from the publication of the Gazette. You will go and read for yourself. But, \nMadam Speaker, the damage has been done, and these changes come too late. The confidence \nhas been shaken already. So, what was the point of frightening off foreign investors? Many \nhave been frightened. We cannot really just quantify how many, but many have been frightened \nfrom the initial announcement to now the Finance Bill. The question is why?  \nMadam Speaker, even more concerning is that under Clause 44 which concerns the Non-\nCitizens (Property Restriction) Act, it had been stated at paragraph 76 of the Annex that \nGovernment would ban, not just the acquisition, but also the disposal of any property and, \ntherefore, would ban the sale of any property already owned by a foreign individual if same \nwas located on State Land or pas géométriques. In other words, foreigners who had legally \npurchased property would now be barred from selling it, a measure bordering on expropriation. \nAnd it seemed that the Ministry of Finance was not even aware of the investment, promotion \nand protection agreements that it has itself signed on behalf of Mauritius with no fewer than \n29 countries, binding treaties, designed to encourage and protect foreign investment, \nparticularly from any form of the depravation or arbitrary restriction. How could you have ever \nthought that this would be reasonable or legal? The Budget, Madam Speaker, would have been \nillegal and this is why I say: “amateurism”. A disregard for legal obligations which has now \n\n108 \n \n \ngreatly shocked that market – a prominent market which Mauritius, as I stated before, relies \nheavily on. \nLet me turn to Clause 39 of the Finance Bill, Madam Speaker, with regard to the National \nPensions Act. You will no doubt have noticed, Madam Speaker, that changes are being brought \nto the National Pensions Act – changes which, you might be surprised, do not tally between \nthe Finance Bill and the explanatory note. If you look at the explanatory note at page 49, you \nwill see that the coming into effect of the BRP to the age of 65 is scheduled for 01 September \n2030. \nIn the Finance Bill, this clearly states, September 2033 and this in itself has been contrary \nto what has been announced either in the Budget, in the annexes, the various and numerous \nstatements on the issue, the various replies to PNQs that it was meant to take effect on 2030, \nand now, it is 2033. What has happened, Madam Speaker, is that now the years have been \nstaggered to 2 years for every year that the retirement is going up. But, Madam Speaker, how \ncan it be that the explanatory notes provided by the Ministry of Finance are different to the \nFinance Bill? How can it be? Such a mistake on such an important issue has made its way \nthrough such an important exercise! \nSo, not only does it contradict the explanatory note, but the Finance Bill, also, on that \nissue, contradicts previous Government announcements, talks about oversight. And, Madam \nSpeaker, even though this last-minute amendment to stagger the increase in eligibility age has \nbeen made, it was not the original intention but they were simply compelled due to mass public \ndemonstration to change their tune somewhat. \nBut, let us be clear, Madam Speaker, this is still not acceptable, this is still not what was \npromised by your Alliance, by this Government, to the people of Mauritius. Be that as it may, \nMadam Speaker, the public does not care whether this increase has been staggered to after \n2023, 2033 or 2030. What the people expected, and rightly so, was for Government to show \nsome of the sacrifices themselves – to cut back on overseas travels and their per diems … \n(Interruptions) \nwhich have reached record level, to reduce on the purchases of new cars and to roll back the \nastronomical 155% increase… \n(Interruptions) \n\n109 \n \n \nMr A. Duval: … in senior advisers’ salaries and these excesses have, it seems, become \nune source d’embarras for the Government.  \nAn hon. Member: Inn bien tape apre… \nMr A. Duval: There is no way that persons who have worked their whole life would \naccept to be deprived of five years of full pension – Rs1 million not even counting the annual \nincreases with inflation. So, how would you think that they would have accepted this? How?  \nI could talk, Madam Speaker, of the latest episode referred today, the Rs1.1 million… \nMr Jhummun: Sonah Ori to pa dir? \nMr A. Duval: … on the Pan-African Parliament that has been wasted, I could talk about \nhow my PQ was unanswered, but for lack of time, I will move on. \n(Interruptions) \nLet me come to an important issue, the tourist tax, Clause 58 which is said to come into \noperation on 01 October 2025. The first issue I would like to raise is that there is an issue of \ndrafting. \nAt Section 39B the word “accommodation” is missing after “tourist” at the first \nparagraph. I think this should be corrected, obviously, but more importantly, Section 39D(1)(b) \nrequires managers or owners of tourist accommodations to remit the tourist fee electronically \nin Euro to the MRA. As you know, Madam Speaker, payments are often made in MUR, USD, \nSouth African rands (ZAR) to these tourist accommodations. \nMadam Speaker: I am giving you one more minute. \nMr A. Duval: The first issue is foreign exchange cost. The second, given that it has to \nbe transferred in Euros, commercial banks charge an astronomical fee of €30 per transfer. So, \nif you are paying, for example, for 10 nights for one person, €30, you would pay the same in \nthe transfer fee because the MRA’s bank is at the SBM. So, the question is, now, how will the \nMRA make sure that this is workable in practice?  \nNow section 39C on the registration of tourist accommodations, it creates another hurdle. \nAs the hon. Minister of Housing and Lands will no doubt agree, many accommodations, today, \noffering services of tourist accommodations are still waiting for their leases to be converted \nfrom residential to industrial. That bars them from being granted a licence of tourist \naccommodation licence from the Tourism Authority and that is to no fault of their own.  \n\n110 \n \n \nI am concluding. I will suggest to go as per what the hon. Junior Minister for Tourism \nhas said himself, has proposed, which is a good idea, that in the interim we grant those persons \na provisional licence whilst they wait for their conversion which takes years, which has taken \nyears under every government anyway, so that they be given a provisional licence or temporary \nlicence so that they may have an insurance which will cover the liability, and so that they may \nbe in accordance with law.  \nIt is not my idea; it is one of the hon. Junior Minister of Tourism. I think Government \nshould follow; it is not… I am concluding, unfortunately. \nTo conclude Madam Speaker, there must be many more mistakes, inconsistencies or \nplain contradictions in the Finance Bill which I have not seen for myself given the rush, but as \nwith many things under this Government, time will tell. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much, hon. A. Duval. \nHon. F. François is going to speak. \n(6.00 p.m.) \nMr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues): Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker, I will briefly comment on two specific clauses of the Finance Bill (No. XVIII \nof 2025) namely, Clause 18 which amends the Finance and Audit Act in relations to Rodrigues \nand Clause 54 which amends the Statistics Act. \nThe majority of my intervention will focus on the Rodrigues Regional Assembly \n(Amendment Bill) (No. XIX of 2025). \nClause 18 of the Finance Bill amends Section 19 to add a new subsection 3A to the \nFinance and Audit Act requiring that the financial statements be prepared in accordance – very \nimportant – with the International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS). \nThe Director of Audit, in his Annual Report 2023-2024, stated that – \n“In view of the challenge to move to accrual-based accounting, the IMF recommended a \nphased approach for the Rodrigues Regional Assembly (RRA) transition to accrual \nIPSAS, and a roadmap was established, which the RRA did not comply with. It is \nrecommended that the RRA must comply with IPSAS.” \nClause 19, specifically for Rodrigues, provides, to add a new subsection (8), which states \n– \n\n111 \n \n \n “The Commissioner [responsible for the subject of Finance under the Regional \nAssembly] shall, within 10 months [instead if 3 months] of the close of every fiscal year, \nsign and submit a consolidated financial statement, in compliance with IPSAS.”  \nMadam Speaker, as additional financial information requirements to the financial \nstatements, Clause 3(b)(iii), provides to file a progress report on performance. This will ensure \nthat project implementations stay on track financially and enable early detection of problems \nor deviations. \nMadam Speaker, Clause 54, Subclause 2A (2) to (5) – Statistics Act amended, introduces \na new National Statistics System so as to establish an integrated system for the development, \nproduction and dissemination of official statistics, in accordance with the Act and the United \nNations Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics. The hon. Prime Minister, in his budget \nspeech concerning innovation – hon. Dr. Sukon – and research, rightly affirmed his long-term \nvision for an innovative and inclusive Republic of Mauritius. Unquestionably, Statistics \nMauritius will need to revamp national indicators to cover national, sectoral and service-level \ngovernment data and align with the national development plan. \nMadam Speaker, it is worth noting that the promotion of research, innovation and \ndevelopment relies heavily on accurate and reliable data. One of the emerging avenues for data \ncapture, sharing and addressing statistical needs is climate change today, and for us, a revamp \nof the Rodrigues Statistics system with additional data. I will not go into the details. \nMadam Speaker, now, allow me to address my main intervention on the technical but \nimportant bill, the Rodrigues Regional Assembly (Amendment) Bill (No. XIX of 2025). Its \nprimary objective is to amend five sections of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act to \nfacilitate the re-introduction of Performance-Based Budgeting (PBB). This reform aims to – \n(i) \nlink funds with results and outcomes; \n(ii) \nenhance operational efficiency in the administration of Rodrigues, and  \n(iii) more importantly, enforce greater responsibility, accountability, stability and \ntransparency within any regional government governing Rodrigues.  \nThe introduction of PBB will enable Regional Government to shift focus from traditional \nline budget inputs to measurable results. I must also highlight that, given the current state of \nthe local budget affairs kafouyaz ek dezord, this Programmed-Based Budgeting is more than \nnecessary for Rodrigues. This will strengthen the legal, institutional, and financial frameworks \n\n112 \n \n \nneeded to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of public expenditure from available funds \nallocated from national budget. \nMadam Speaker, let me now address the constitutionality of this RRA (Amendment) Bill \nto clear any confusion or misunderstanding. By convention, there is no alternative but to \nproceed pragmatically, with due respect to the constitutional provisions entrenching the \nRegional Assembly. I find reassurance in the respect and functionality of the autonomy of \nRodrigues, as affirmed by the hon. Prime Minister, who stated that, and I quote – \n“The Executive Council [the actual one] of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly has been \nconsulted and is agreeable to the proposed amendments.”  \nMadam Speaker, this Bill will enable the Rodrigues Regional Assembly to prepare the \n2026-2027 Budget Estimates using the new PBB framework. The House will recall that the \nfirst transition from Output-Based Budgeting to Programme-Based Budgeting by the Regional \nAssembly occurred in 2009 rightly stated by hon. Edouard and amended in 2015, which faced \nseveral implementation challenges. \nThe then Chief Commissioner, following approval of the RRA amendments by the \nCentral Government, moved a Motion in his name and I quote – \n“That the Regional Assembly concurs with the amendments of the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly Act as proposed by the Central Government to enable the introduction of \nProgramme-Based Budgeting, pursuant to section 75E of the Constitution of the \nRepublic of Mauritius.”  \nThis Motion was debated, approved, and concurred with by the Regional Assembly. Let me \ncite the Article 75E which stipulates that – \n“(…) any law giving effect to this Chapter and to any incidental matters shall not be \naltered without the concurrence of the Regional Assembly unless such alteration is \nsupported at the final voting in the National Assembly by the votes of not less than two-\nthirds of all the members.” \nTherefore, the implementation of this Bill, will require, alongside the concurrence of the \nRegional Assembly, certain amendments to the Regional Assembly Standing Orders and Rules \n– locally there. \nMadam Speaker, you will agree with me that any government has power but misuse of \nthat power and poor policy decisions are unwarranted and pose risks to our society. The present \n\n113 \n \n \namendment to the Regional Assembly Act is not only a reform towards a PBB approach for \npragmatism and practicality, but also a meaningful, responsible and productive piece of \nlegislation that promotes good governance. \nMadam Speaker, the principle of accountability of government domains and functions to \nParliament will enable us, as Parliamentarians, to raise concerns about proper political choices, \nobjectives, and the rational planning and allocation of resources. For example, let me \nsubstantiate that, if a vulnerable person is waiting for years to obtain a social housing, while \nGovernment decides to prioritise unwarranted purchase of Rs147 million worth of vehicles, \nnow lying idle with no drivers or qualified operators – despite budget provision of only Rs33 \nmillion – this highlights wastes and misallocation. PBB will also redress procurement collusion \nbetween politicians and civil servants. \nMadam Speaker, the new Section 21A at Clause 18 of the Finance bill, outlines the \noverall responsibilities of Accounting Officers, precisely at subclause (b) to provide for – \n“(b) effective and appropriate steps are taken to prevent unauthorised, irregular and \nwasteful expenditure;” \nAnd the House will also recognise the seriousness of the regional situation, as the hon. \nPrime Minister stated in his reply to my PQ B/650 that – \n “The Chief Commissioner’s Office of the RRA issued a Circular in June 2025 on \nProcedures of Reallocation that are not consistent with the Ministry of Finance’s policies \nand principles on virement.” \nThis issue stems from the line-item budgeting which leads to abuse and the reckless use \nof funds resources.  \nIn that regard, I commend the hon. Prime Minister’s proposals to address this \nmismanagement of public finances, including collaboration between the Ministry of Finance \nand the RRA, to issue a revised circular on virement. I am informed of excess virement of more \nthan 30% to the last budget for unprecedented non-spent capital budget, whereas the allowable \nlimit is only 2%. \nIt is witnessed that public administration, under public pressure, blindly follows political \ninstructions without complying with established rules and regulations. \nMadam Speaker, to substantiate same, just to have a picture of what I am saying and the \nseriousness of this matter, how can a construction project for constructing approximately 26 \n\n114 \n \n \nparking slots, 200 meters of masonry coastal protection (including demolition and \nreconstruction), and a new 15 meters jetty – which was not budgeted during last financial year. \nNo request for proposal nor the Ministry of Finance financial clearance was obtained – was \nawarded to a contractor through work orders under the budget item roads at a cost exceeding \nRs40 million, to the expense of announced budgeted roads projects like Montagne Cabri-Est – \nmo bann pov frer Montagne Cabri – and Montagne Malgache to Port Sud-Est? \nI put it clearly. I am not opposed to any development projects in Rodrigues, Madam \nSpeaker. But the financial procedures applied are problematic, leading to uncontrollable and \nunpredictable budget decisions. \nThe Rodrigues Regional Assembly (Amendment) Bill comes at an opportune time for \nsound fiscal planning and greater budget credibility. As the saying goes, ‘Se enn lokasion pou \nmet enn bon lord dan bann desord zestion finans piblik dan Rodrig. Chaque roupie depensée, \nbizin bien depanse.’ \nMadam Speaker, I hope that the recent unwarranted, illegal and politically motivated \nregional budget increase without Cabinet’s concurrence, violating established practices and \nconventions of technical discussion and agreement between the Ministry of Finance and the \nRRA, will once and for all become things of the past. \nI hope PBB will mark a full stop to the abuse of our local public finances and remedy the \nerosion of intergovernmental trust from political propaganda. Lager larzan bidze ek santaz. We \nhave to be responsible and serious, especially with regard to the autonomy of Rodrigues, for \nwhich our fathers and mothers, sisters and brothers have fought for to give us, the people of \nRodrigues, an identity. Today, when we see some people salir cette autonomie, Madame la \nprésidente, vous savez ce que cela me fait en tant que Rodriguais responsable, et aussi, à tous \nces gens de Rodrigues, qui sont conscients de l’avenir de Rodrigues de demain – des gens \nresponsables ?  \nMadam Speaker, let me conclude! \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr François: In its political combat for Rodrigues’… \nMadam Speaker: One minute! \nMr François: I am concluding. \n\n115 \n \n \nIn its political combat for Rodrigues’ autonomy, the OPR aspires to leave a legacy of an \nexemplary and model Rodrigues for future generations. \nPBB is one of the right paths to end political misappropriation of Rodrigues’ future, while \npreventing the population from being kept in the dark by complacent behaviours and opaque \ndecisions. \nPBB is not only a necessity, but an urgent need that the hon. Prime Minister, hon. Deputy \nPrime Minister and hon. colleagues will agree with. \nSurely, Rodrigues Regional Assembly (Amendment) Bill will link funds with results and \noutcomes, improve operational efficiency in Rodrigues’ administration, and enforce greater \nfiscal responsibility, accountability, and transparency. \nMadam speaker, I am confident that this august Assembly will unanimously vote in \nsupport to the Rodrigues Regional Assembly (Amendment) Bill of 2025 as proposed by the \nhon. Prime Minister and the Government. \nI can also assure the hon. Prime Minister, hon. Deputy Prime Minister, and the House \nthat the OPR Party, at the Regional Assembly, will have no quarrel on any motion of \nconcurrence in the interest of good governance for Rodrigues and the success of our autonomy. \nMadam Speaker, with these words, I thank you for your kind attention. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Member, you were right on time! \nMr François: Oh, yes! \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Damry, please! \n(6.17 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Finance (Mr D. Damry): Madam Speaker, the amendments in \nthe Finance Bill set a clear policy and direction for our long-term public finances and our \neconomy. It is important to note that the clarity of vision for public finances will, henceforth, \nbe growth-led revenue rather than tax-led revenue.  \nThis is a stark demarcation from what the MSM did for 10 years. They printed money; \nthey imported inflation; they applied consumption tax; they applied devaluation tax, and they \napplied inflation tax at the detriment of the citizens. This is what we are changing. \nGrowth-led revenues are very important because it is growth that sustains the viability of \na social system, be it pensions, education, social housing or health care.  \n\n116 \n \n \nI think it is time to put one matter to rest. The MSM government clearly intended to \nterminate all CSG Allowances on 30 June 2025. I would like to quote paragraph 30B (3) of the \nSocial Contribution and Social Benefits Act 2021.  \nIt is about income allowance – \n“(3) The income allowance shall be payable to an eligible individual directly in his bank \naccount at the beginning of each month for the months of [hear it] July 2022 to June \n2025.” \nIt cannot be clearer than that. \nNow, when we come to the social contract, the spirit of pension reforms is very clear. It \nis aligning payment age to retirement age, and it is phased over five years.  \nNow, for the benefit of our youth, we are building that bridge to the future. I would like, \nonce again, to shed some more light on the policy. The policy is to develop and promote outlier \ngrowth revenues while at the same time consolidating recovery and resilience revenues.  \nLet me illustrate it through four amendments in the Finance Bill – \n(i) \nThe Banking Act and The Bank of Mauritius Act provide for KYC institutions;  \n(ii) The Bills of Exchange Act provides for electronic bills of exchange; \n(iii) The Economic Development Board Act provides for innovative Mauritius scheme, \nand \n(iv) The Income Tax Act provides for virtual assets service providers. \nTo the layman, it may sound that each of these proposed amendments have individual \nintended consequences. However, when put together, the sum of these amendments and the \nsum of these intended consequences provide a giant leap in our economic policy. They provide \nfor the digital and AI economy. But we will not see the benefits of these amendments today \nbecause the previous government has done nothing for the past 10 years.  \nAllow me to illustrate because we are talking about strategy. Earlier, the Leader of the \nOpposition said that we do not have a strategy for tourism. Hang on! We have a strategy not \nonly for tourism, but for the entire economy.  \nSo, let me make some reference, let us learn from what is happening in the global \neconomy. Last year in 2024, the Nobel Prize winner for Economics, MIT’s known Professor \nDaron Acemoglu wrote a paper called the Macroeconomics of AI. In that paper, he studied the \n\n117 \n \n \nimpact of AI on global economies. Goldman Sachs said that productivity gains could be \nanything around 1% of global GDP – say 7 trillion dollars. McKinsey said the productivity or \nimpact of AI could be anywhere between 1.5% to 3.5% in terms of productivity gains, and \nSingapore is estimating that the productivity gains, over the next few years, will be up to 18% \nof their GDP.  \nSo, just imagine, if in the years to come, we make even a 1% productivity gain to our \nGDP – through the measures that we are setting out today, that’s 1% GDP gain. What Singapore \nis very good at doing, they are also creating a SPRING Board to be in the supply chain of AI \nServices. And, Mauritius is well poised to do that and if we do that, we add another 1% to our \nGDP. All of a sudden, that’s 2% to our GDP. The reason I said, it is outright growth is because \nthese sectors are meant to grow exponentially, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, that’s the kind of growth \nthat we can expect from these sectors.  \nBut in the meantime, while we invest in that, while we prepare, we have to ensure \neconomic growth through recovery and resilience sectors. There are two sectors: the first one \nis property development. What the previous government did was ten years of property sales. \nThey had no clue what to do in productive economies. Because this Government wants to create \njobs, we want to bring forex in our country and when speaking about property, it was clear that \nno one is above the law, even the Government is not above the law. This Government could \nnot, like the previous government did, subject this nation to another Betamax or another Patel \nEngineering Ltd, by not following the law. That is one of the reasons why we grandfathered \nSmart City regulations and other property regulations. That is the reason why we had to bring \nthese amendments to the Finance Bill.  \nThe second reason is: while developing the new economic order, we have to ensure that \nwe get at least 3 to 4% growth as we have estimated in our medium-term outlook. The second \nsector is, of course, the global business sector, and here, I would like to touch upon, – hon. \nUteem said it very well. In fact, both of us have been professionals in the financial services \nsector for the past 20 years, at least me, before getting in this House and this is a sector we \nknow very well and the hon. Leader of the Opposition talked about the qualified domestic \nminimum tax top-up. Hon. Uteem explained it very well.  \nThe OECD and the G20 adopted this Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules and what \nthis means is that 15% in your country but if you are paying 3% here, then you have to pay the \nbalance in another country. At the same time, MNEs like big MNCs, any MNC, any business \n\n118 \n \n \nfor that matter, any investor for that matter, they always need clarity and certainty. I will not \nshare the name but I had a discussion with one of those MNCs in Mauritius, and they were \nworried because they had no clarity of what was Mauritius’ position with regard to QDMTT \nbecause 131 countries in the world have subscribed to it. So, you cannot have investment if \nyou do not have certainty. This is one of the things that this amendment is bringing. The hon. \nLeader of the Opposition said that such MNCs would go to Singapore and to UAE, if I heard \nwell. \nWell, let me, for his knowledge, advise, Singapore adopted the QDMTT law in 2024, the \nMultinational Enterprise (Minimum Tax) Act 2024. The UAE adopted the same law through a \nCabinet Decision No. 142 of 2024. So, they have done it before Mauritius, we are playing \ncatch-up. We have been playing catch-up in every growth area, Madam Speaker, and this is \nwhat this Finance Bill is trying to remedy.  \nLet me now also add one thing that the proposed amendments in this Finance Bill, they \nwill provide for a sound Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) risk adjusted \nmacroeconomic fundamentals. What this means is that international institutions will always \nlook at us with a lot of attractiveness.  \nThe hon. Leader of the Opposition made reference to foreign currency. So, we are \nproposing an amendment in the Income Tax Act where businesses earning more than 50% of \ntheir revenues will pay their tax in foreign currency. These are measures that should have been \nbrought in way earlier but they have not. \nMadam Speaker, I don’t think I will speak more because the hon. Prime Minister and \nhon. Reza Uteem canvassed the Finance Bill so well but I always like to end with one or two \nshort stories that inspire me and maybe they can inspire you too. \nMadam Speaker: You have a bit of time! \nMr Damry: That’s alright. I think, let me tell the story. So, the Mauritius nation… \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Nou ekout zistwar la! \nMr Mohamed: Mo ti kroir story la lor li sa! \nMr Damry: No, I will not. But, since you told me I have a bit of time, three very short \nstories. \n\n119 \n \n \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Damry: The first thing is its… \n(Interruptions) \nIt’s important, I know… \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Zistwar la billet mil… \nMadam Speaker: Let him speak! \nMr Damry: Let me speak. I know why the hon. Leader of the Opposition... So, I will \nask the House a question – what is the average IQ of a normal human being?  \nMadam Speaker: 155! \nMr Damry: It’s about 122.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay! \nMr Damry: Right? Elon Musk and Einstein, their IQ is about 155. \nMadam Speaker: That’s it! \nMr Damry: Guess who else has this IQ? AI! And guess what is happening to the IQ of \nAI? It will keep doubling over the next six months. This is the prediction and this is why the \nface of change, the velocity of change will be so rapid that we have to adapt. I am glad to say, \nnow the hon. Prime Minister will be happy, because we have a leader, a leadership that adapts \nto change. And, there are two stories that I would like, one for the nation and one for us. The \nnation has always stood with the motherland whenever the motherland has needed its children.  \nSo, since we are speaking about the economy, you have Jack Ma. Jack Ma always talks \nabout entrepreneurs in this way, he says – \n“Today is difficult, tomorrow is even more difficult, but the day after tomorrow morning \nwill be very beautiful.\" \nUnfortunately, most of the people give up, they give up tomorrow afternoon.  \nThey don’t wait till day after tomorrow morning. And I am very happy and this really \ntouches me that the nation is with us and together, we will rise; this government, the whole \nnation, after three years, when we have redressed our economy based on our budget outflow.  \n\n120 \n \n \nAnd the one commitment that we can make to the nation and this is what the Prime \nMinister said, he does not promise to take the nation to heaven but he certainly will not take \nthe nation to hell. And I can tell you this is what Thomas Edison said –  \n“Maybe I did not find 10,000 ways that worked but I will keep trying till I find that one \nway that will work.” \nAnd this is what we will do to support the Prime Minister, to support this government \nand with this, I commend all the three Bills to the House. \nThank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Ms Jeetun.  \n(6.33 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning (Dr. Ms J. Jeetun): \nMadam Speaker, I rise today in this august Assembly with a sense of deep responsibility and \npurpose to support the Finance (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2025.  \nThis government was entrusted with a historic mandate, not only to reverse a decade of \ndrift and to rebuild fiscal credibility but also to reignite economic dynamism and to inspire \nconfidence and hope in the future of Mauritius.  \nMadam Speaker, one of the key objectives of the Finance Bill 2025, is a total reset of our \neconomic model, starting with fiscal consolidation, that is, reducing government deficits and \nimproving the fiscal balance. So, we could either cut public spending or increase revenue or do \nboth. And as a responsible government, restoring investor confidence is paramount to \nachieving the challenging revenue targets set by this budget. Push too hard on the revenue side \nand the perceived tax burden becomes too high, and we face the risk of losing investors’ \nconfidence which then can lead to a direct negative impact on growth. Some of the changes to \nthe Finance Bill that I will be talking about, are to avoid that situation.  \nSo, just as social safety nets were introduced to protect the vulnerable groups through the \nIncome Allowance, it is also important that our revenue sides, fiscal measures do not dampen \ngrowth.  \nMadam Speaker, we have an inclusive and responsible approach to governance. We listen \nto the voices of the people; we listen to the voices of enterprises and we are therefore \nintroducing a number of refinements and clarifications to this Bill.  These changes reflect the \nvaluable feedback received from various stakeholders. They reaffirm our commitment to \n\n121 \n \n \ngetting the details right, to ensure that reforms are not only ambitious; they are fair, they are \npractical and they are implementable.  \nSo, Madam Speaker, allow me to highlight the key amendments relating to the financial \nservices sector. First, under the Income Tax Act, with regard to the Fair Share Contribution for \nbusinesses, global business entities are exempted. I wish to draw the attention of the House to \nsome important clarifications brought with respect to foundations and trusts which are the two \ncornerstone structures in our global financial services architecture.  \nThe Finance Bill provides for the harmonisation of treatment of these entities under the \nIncome Tax Act ensuring that they benefit from the same legal clarity and fiscal predictability \nafforded to global business license holders. So, by replacing the term global license with global \nbusiness license, the Bill ensures that foundations, trusts, and similar fiduciary structures are \nappropriately included in our tax and regulatory framework.  \nThese measures strengthen Mauritius status as a trusted and innovative jurisdiction for \nwealth management, succession planning and philanthropic capital particularly for Africa and \nAsia where such instruments are gaining relevance. Let me immediately reassure the House \nthat the principle of the source of chargeable income will be respected. So, trusts and \nfoundations with chargeable income from domestic activities will not benefit from this \nexemption.  \nSecond, Madam Speaker, the Finance Bill legislates key revenue raising measures from \nthe budget including the introduction of the Fair Share contribution and the Domestic Top-up \nTax as part of our commitment to align the OECD Pillar Two – Global Minimum Tax rules.  \nWe understand that parts of the industry have expressed concerns about the potential \nimpact of these measures on competitiveness. The QDMTT Provisions did create some causes \nfor concerns and uncertainty in the industry given that many countries such as the US and India \nhave not yet implemented these rules. \nHowever, as the Prime Minister clearly emphasised the other day, consultations will be \nheld with the industry stakeholders and regulations will be made to make provisions for \nexclusions and incentives to give relief to companies that become liable to the Global Minimum \nTax. This provides the much-needed clarity and assurance to global businesses set up in our \nfinancial services sector. It improves legal certainty and reduces the risk of ambiguity for \naffected tax payers. Bottom line, it safeguards the attractiveness and competitiveness of the \nMauritius International Financial Sector.  \n\n122 \n \n \nThird, Madam Speaker, the next amendment concerns the Value Added Tax Act, to bring \nclarity on the banking sector. We are expressly clarifying that the 35% cap om chargeable \nincome applies solely to domestic banking business and not to global business. \nMadam Speaker, the financial sector in Mauritius remains the largest contributor of \ncorporate tax of our national revenue, underscoring its vital role in sustaining our fiscal \nframework. The sector contributed some Rs15 billion in corporate tax that is, more that 68% \nof corporate tax. The Banking Industry continues to report good level of profitability which \nsupports the merit of proposal to increase taxation on banks.  \nHowever, we must recognise the inherent duality of the Mauritian Banking Industry, \nwhich necessitates a nuance approach to taxation policy. On one hand, the domestic banking \nsector remains dominated by two large layers. If we are to promote greater competition in this \nsector, particularly encouraging participation from international banks in our domestic market, \nwe must ensure that taxation policies are not detrimental to this objective.  \nSo, a differentiated taxation approach is therefore essential with a cap of 35% for \ndomestic banking operations being justified to maintain competitive conditions that can attract \nnew entrance while ensuring fair contribution from profitable institutions.  \nOn the other hand, the global banking sector of the Mauritian Banking Industry relies \nheavily on the attractiveness of the Mauritius International Financial Centre as a jurisdiction of \nchoice. High taxation levels will make returns less attractive in this segment and may prompt \ninternational banks currently using Mauritius to channel their resources to other more attractive \nor tax efficient jurisdictions. Not only this could undermine our strategic position as a leading \nfinancial hub, but it will also go against our agreed strategy to position this sector which is \nalready the first pillar of our economy into a major engine for growth.  \nTherefore, while there is clear merit in increasing taxes on banks given their strong \nprofitability, we advocated for a differentiated taxation policy that recognises the distinct \ndynamics of our domestic and global business banking sectors. Madam Speaker, it was \nimportant to clarify this.  \nThis approach will ensure we maximise fiscal revenues while preserving the \ncompetitiveness and attractiveness that has made Mauritius a preferred financial services \ndestination.  \nThe fourth amendment, Madam Speaker, is under the Economic Development Board Act \nwhere the salary threshold for occupation permit regime is being adjusted to Rs30,000.  \n\n123 \n \n \nIt is no secret that the financial services sector is entirely dependent on highly skilled \nstaff, and it is also no secret – we have outlined that in our Strategy Report in 2025-2030 for \nthe sector – that there are major human capital gaps in the sector. So, while measures will be \ntaken to mitigate this situation in medium and long term, it is important to recognise the need \nof the industry in the short term.  \nFor example, the unique structural model and operational characteristic of fund \nadministration in our global business sector requires fund accounting professionals. This \nchange, therefore, ensures that Mauritius can avail itself of talent in specific sectors to remain \ncompetitive and aligned with international fund servicing norms. \nMadam Speaker, last but not the least, I wish to draw the attention of the House to a \nsignificant clarification affecting the real estate and property development sector. In fact, this \nindustry should not be seen in isolation.  \nIt is very intricately linked to the financial services sector as many of the non-citizens \nwho buy properties in these schemes administered by the Economic Development Board are \nalso investors in our global business structures. It is, therefore, important to understand the life \ncycle of a real estate project that can take up to four, five, six, seven years from concept design \nto feasibility to marketing, having to secure more than 75% of funded reservation with deposits \nto secure the Garantie Financière d'Achèvement (GFA) and get all the permits before they can \neven start digging for construction. \nMany foreign investors relocate their businesses to Mauritius through the global business \nsector. They also relocate with their families and they put in a deposit and have to wait for years \nbefore they actually take possession. So, there was a need for some certainty in this sector. The \nBill, therefore, introduces transitional provisions in the form of grandfathering arrangements \nto protect ongoing projects.  \nThis grandfathering mechanism is essential to maintain investor confidence, mitigate \nuncertainty and ensure that strategic long-term developments in the sector are not being \nadversely impacted. It also aligns with global best practices in safeguarding preexisting \ncontractual commitments, particularly in jurisdictions where property development is a major \nsource of FDI. We must also not forget the direct linkage not only to the financial services \nsector, but also the multiplier effect that these buyers have on the wider economy.  \nMadam Speaker, these refinements reflect our conviction. They show that this \nGovernment leads by listening and governs with both ambition and precision. By pairing bold \n\n124 \n \n \nreforms with thoughtful transitional measures, we are demonstrating maturity, responsibility \nand fairness in policy making. This is how lasting, inclusive reform is done with clarify and \nconsultation. With this Bill, we are making choices not for popularity, but for posterity.  \nWe are choosing bold reforms over political convenience, substance over spectacle and \nstrategic foresight over short term fixes. All this for the betterment and future of the nation.  \nMadam Speaker, the Finance Bill is not only about legislative changes. It is about \ncredibility, purpose, and ambition. It is about the kind of country we wish to be: transparent, \nforward thinking and resilient. It is about the confidence we must inspire among citizens, but \nalso confidence about investors and our partners. This Bill is also not merely about laws. It is \nabout leadership. It is not just a collection of amendments. It closes the chapter on a decade of \ndecline and opens a new chapter grounded in economic reality in hope and in future prosperity \nbuilt on solid foundations. \nWe are not here to be populists. We are here to govern by principle with empathy and \nresponsibility. History will retain, Madam Speaker, that this Government led by a bold and \ncourageous Prime Minister and a Deputy Prime Minister and all my colleagues in this House \nhere who had the audacity to choose a path that was albeit the most difficult one, but it was the \nright one. As I said, we are not here to be liked, but we are here to lead. \nWith this, Madam Speaker, I am very proud of the vision and courage that this Bill \npresents. I invite the House to lend its support so that we can convert legislative intent into \ntransformative impact.  \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Boolell! \nDr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, I beg to move for the adjournment of the debate. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to.  \nDebate adjourned accordingly. \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now adjourn \nto Friday 01 August 2025 at 3.00 p.m. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \n\n125 \n \n \n Question put and agreed to.  \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned! \nAt 6.49 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Friday 01 August 2025 at 3.00 \np.m. \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nMR. K.P. – RENUMERATED POSITIONS – CONTRACT DETAILS & \nALLOWANCES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/780",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 780,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/780) Mr N. Beejan  (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mr. K.P., \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the Ministries/Government \nBodies/Parastatal Bodies in which he held remunerated positions over the period 2015 to 2024, \nindicating in each case, the – \n(a) \ncapacity thereof; \n(b)  terms and conditions of contract, including remuneration and other allowances and \nbenefits drawn, and  \n(c) \noverseas missions undertaken, indicating the – \n(i) \ncosts incurred, giving details thereof \n(ii) \ncountries visited \n(iii) duration thereof, and  \n(iv) name of other members of each delegation.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nGRAND GAUBE POLICE STATION – ROAD OFFENCES & NOISE \nPOLLUTION OFFENCES – CONTRAVENTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/781",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 781,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/781) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Grand Gaube Police Station, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the number of contraventions booked by officers \nattached thereto since 12 June 2025 to date, indicating the number thereof booked for road \noffences and noise pollution offences, respectively. \n\n126",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that since 12 June to 27 July 2025, \n102 contraventions relating to road offences have been established by the Grand Gaube Police \nStation.  There has been no contravention for noise pollution for the period under reference. \nHowever, there are complaints from inhabitants concerning noise pollution in the coastal \nregion of Grand Gaube. \nIn this regard, Police, with the support of Special Mobile Force personnel, are deployed \non Grand Gaube public beach during weekends as a deterrent. \nFurthermore, during this year, 19 sensitisation campaigns and 110 crackdown operations \nhave been carried out by officers of Grand Gaube Police Station with the assistance of other \nUnits of the Police.  In addition, 23 crackdown operations were carried out this year in the \nregion of Grand Gaube by the Police de l’Environnement, Special Mobile Force and Special \nSupport Unit. \n I am informed that the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate \nChange has made provision in this financial year for the acquisition of Noise Measuring \nInstruments for the Police de l’Environnement. Regarding the use of these instruments, the \nassistance of the Health Engineering Unit of the Ministry of Health and Wellness will be \nsolicited to provide training to officers of the Police de l’Environnement. \n \nFOREIGN WORKERS – ILLEGAL STAY IN MAURITIUS – NATIONALITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/782",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 782,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/782) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to foreign \nworkers recruited since January 2015 to November 2024 having overstayed and currently \nillegally staying on the Mauritian territory, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \nthe Passport and Immigration Office, information as to the number and nationality thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nFORMER PRIME MINISTER’S ADVISERS – NAMES AND \nREMUNERATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/783",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 783,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/783) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien)  \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nAdvisers whose services were retained by the former Prime Minister, he will state the names \n\n127 \n \n \nand pay packages thereof, including the boards on which they equally served over the period \n2015 to November 2024.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nAMNESTY SCHEME – LOAN OVERDUE – WRITE-OFF CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/784",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 784,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/784) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the amnesty scheme \nfor the writing-off of long outstanding loans of over 20 years or of deceased planters, breeders, \nfishermen and micro entrepreneurs of both mainland Mauritius and Rodrigues, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Development Bank of Mauritius Ltd., information as to \nthe number of – \n(a) \ncases thereof settled as at to date and total quantum of the loans written off, and \n(b) \noutstanding cases as at date, indicating where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Development Bank of Mauritius Ltd (DBM) that, following \nBudget 2021-2022, an Amnesty Scheme was introduced with the objective of writing-off long \noutstanding loans owed by planters, breeders and fishermen who were facing difficulties to \nrepay their dues. The Scheme was halted in Financial Year 2022-2023. \nHowever, a new Amnesty Scheme was introduced in Budget 2023/2024 and extended \nin 2024-2025 with the eligibility criteria broadened to include micro entrepreneurs and long \noutstanding loans of more than 20 years as well as unpaid loans by deceased borrowers in the \naforementioned categories. \nIn regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the House that, as at 30 June 2025, \nthe DBM has approved 884 cases for write-off of long outstanding dues for an aggregate \namount of Rs192.1 million, of which, 126 cases relate to beneficiaries from Rodrigues for an \napproved amount of Rs20 million.  Of note, out of the Rs192.1 million, Rs71 million pertain \nto loans of 313 deceased borrowers, of which, 30 cases for a total amount of Rs4.4 million are \nfrom Rodrigues. \nRegarding part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that there are 23 \noutstanding cases, of which, 15 cases relate to Rodrigues and same are under process. \n \n \n \n\n128 \n \n \nSODNAC WELLNESS PARK – OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/785",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 785,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/785) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Sodnac \nWellness Park, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Employees Welfare Fund, \ninformation as to whether consideration will be given for the replacement of the outdoor \nequipment found thereat and, if so, give details thereof and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed that the first phase of the Sodnac Wellness Park started in 2009 \nand was completed in August 2012. The park was officially launched on 06 November 2012. \nUnder the second phase, an open outdoor gym was set up comprising a series of physical \nexercise equipment. The gym was officially launched in April 2014. \nAfter a decade of heavy use, the gym equipment is now out of order and nothing has been \ndone by the previous government to renew the equipment and restore the wellness park for the \nbenefit of the inhabitants.  On the 28 November 2024, the public has been advised not to utilise \nsame to avoid any injury. \nI am informed that the contract for the disposal of all existing equipment as scrap from \nthe park has already been awarded to Grap Stella Steel Ltd., a recycling company, for a \nreceivable amount of Rs16,380. \nI am also informed that EWF has earmarked an amount of Rs7 million for Financial Year \n2025/26 for the replacement of the gym equipment. \nA tender exercise will be carried out shortly for the supply, fixing and commissioning of \nthe new gym equipment. \nMINISTER OF INDUSTRY, SME & COOPERATIVES – OFFICIAL OVERSEAS \nMISSIONS – NOVEMBER 2024 TO 29 JULY 2025 – DELEGATION & COST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/786",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 786,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/786) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Cycle Network Project for the \nregion of Beau Bassin, Rose Hill and Ebene, he will state where matters stand as to the inquiry \ninitiated by his Ministry in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: B/786 is a nice coincidence. It is my registration number of the \nRoll of Engineers.  \nMadam Speaker, I would like to refer the hon. Member to my reply to her PQ B/153 of \n18 March 2025 whereby I informed the House that an inquiry will be carried out on the Cycle \nNetwork Project, which was implemented by the Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit of \n\n41 \n \n \nmy Ministry, owing to its high value and failing of the paint at several locations, which the hon. \nMember had mentioned in the House. \nTo recall, the hon. Member had questioned me as to whether an inquiry would be \nconducted on this project that cost Rs61.94 million, inclusive of VAT. In this respect, Madam \nSpeaker, the Internal Control Unit of my Ministry was requested to conduct an inquiry with the \nfollowing terms of reference – \n(a) \nTo assess compliance with procedures; \n(b) \nReview the procurement process, and \n(c) \nAssess the role of stakeholders. \nMadam Speaker, the Internal Control Unit has submitted its report to my Ministry on 30 \nMay 2025. I must say the findings are appalling. The list is quite long. I will just mention the \nsalient ones for this project at this stage which I have to remind the House, as I stated before, \nis devoid of a regulatory framework – \n(i) \nRegarding the compliance and procedure part, which is the first part of the terms \nof reference, the capital project process manual and the conditions of contract \nhave not been complied with; \n(ii) \nThere are instances where major items which have not been completed, but they \nwere paid for. This tantamount to forgery; \n(iii) \nThe photos and fading road markings, as were tabled by hon. Ms Anquetil, has \nbeen confirmed by the Internal Control Unit. As a matter of fact, there have been \ndiscrepancies in the materials used. \nNow, coming back to the second part of the terms of reference, the review of the \nprocurement process. The findings are as follows – \n(i) \nThere were inconsistencies in the scope of works for the consultancy services of \nMega Design Consultants Ltd., which is the consultant that was appointed.  \nI am informed that there are deviations as regards requirements of the Construction \nIndustry Development Board (CIDB). There were in appropriate in evaluation of technical bids \nfor consultancy services and I am informed that the consultant was paid a total of Rs13.472 \nmillion inclusive of VAT. \n(ii) \nThere were inappropriate cost estimates by that the TRMSU.  \n\n42 \n \n \n(iii) Rate submitted by the contractor was on the high side.  \n(iv) The contract was awarded to Transinvest Construction Ltd though the contract \nprice was 25.13% higher than the cost estimate. It is to be noted that the required \nlimit as per the capital project process manual of the Ministry of Finance is only \n15%. \nMadam Speaker, as regards the assessment of the role of stakeholders which is the third \npart of the terms of reference, the Internal Control Unit found major shortfalls in connection \nwith lack of supervision by the project manager at the TRMSU and at the Ministry’s level. \nMadam Speaker, against this backdrop, I would like to inform the hon. Member and the \nHouse that the report is now being submitted to the Financial Crimes Commission for further \ninvestigation. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Ms Anquetil! \nMs Anquetil : Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Je suis abasourdie par la \nréponse du hon. Ministre. Will the hon. Minister inform the House of the number of meetings \nchaired by the former Minister Ganoo in connection with this project? Thank you. \nMr Osman Mahomed: I do not have this number but, Madam Speaker, I have to say \nthat in my more than a decade of career in the Civil Service, I have never seen such level of \ndeviation with approved processes and manuals. In as much as the report is being forwarded to \nthe Financial Crimes Commission, I will leave it to the Commission to elucidate whether the \nofficers took it on themselves or were instructed by other people including the former Minister. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMs Anquetil: A last one, Madam Speaker. Will the hon. Minister indicate whether the \nfindings of the inquiry will be made public in the interest of transparency and good governance? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I have a report with me. It is quite thick. This \nis the report that is being forwarded to the Financial Crimes Commission for further enquiry. I \nbelieve at this stage it will be improper for me to table it. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, too early. \nYes, Hon. Beejan, the Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or. \n \n \n\n43 \n \n \nGOODLANDS – DOORGACHURN HURRY GOVERNMENT SCHOOL – \nCONSTRUCTION OF DRAINS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/787",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 787,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/787) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre D'or) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the Royal Road, Goodlands, in the \nvicinity of the Doorgachurn Hurry Government School, he will state if consideration will be \ngiven for the carrying out of urgent measures, including construction of drains, to address the \nissue of large water accumulation during and after heavy rainfalls thereat since years thereby \nrendering same inaccessible and unsafe for pedestrians and vehicles and, if so, indicate the \nexpected start and completion dates thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Road Development Authority that \nthe road in front of Doorgachurn Hurry Government School in Goodlands known as the \nMapou-Goodlands A5 road is frequently flooded during heavy rainfall period due to surface \nrun-off from lateral roads and lack of adequate drainage network. These floods events caused \nsignificant disruption to school attendance, pose serious safety risk to students, pedestrians and \nroad users and adversely affect vehicular movement along the Mapou-Goodlands road. \nTo resolve the flooding problem at this locus, a comprehensive drainage scheme has been \nproposed by the Land Drainage Authority, comprising two main components, namely –  \n• Component 1 – Provision of concrete drains, dimension 0.7 metre by 0.7 metres \nover stretch of 400 metres along A5 road in front of the school, and \nConstruction of a cross drains across A5 road to evacuate water from lateral \nroads. \nGiven that the first component relates to a main road, the works have been \nentrusted to the RDA. The works have been estimated at Rs18 million and will \nbe carried out under the Framework Agreement of the RDA to be funded under \nthe National Flood Management Programme. Once financial clearance is secured, \na work’s order will be issued and the drain works will be implemented within \neight months. \n• Component 2 – in parallel, the National Development Unit has been requested \nto proceed with complementary flood mitigation interventions within the \nvicinity, including – \n(i) \nprovision of a 50 metre-stretch of absorption drain along Verger Road to \ncapture excess run-off from upstream regions, and \n\n44 \n \n \n(ii) \nconstruction of absorption drains and installation of cross drains along JSS \nRoad, Reservoir Road and Soobhany Road with grating. \nThe works are currently being implemented by General Construction Ltd for an amount \nof Rs14.6 million. Works started in October 2024 and are expected to be completed by August \n2025. \nMadam Speaker, a long-term solution to the issue of flooding along Royal Road, \nGoodlands in the vicinity of Doorgachurn Hurry Government School, will be obtained once \nboth components have been implemented. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, one question! \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Will the hon. Minister confirm if a request has \nbeen obtained previously by the former Government representative in the Assembly regarding \nthese repeated problems in the region of Goodlands? \nMr Gunness: As far as I am aware, I do not think a request was made but anyway we \nare undertaking the works by RDA and the NDU. There are two projects that will be \nundertaken. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, the hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River! \n \nRIAMBEL – STATE LANDS – LEASEHOLDERS & SQUATTERS – \nREGULARISATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/788",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 788,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/788) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to State lands in Riambel, he will state the \nnumber of – \n(a) \nleaseholders thereof, and \n(b) \nsquatters thereof, indicating the mechanism, if any, put in place by the Ministry \nfor the regularisation thereof and, measures taken, if any, for them to have access \nto water and electricity.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed \nthat a total of 2 to 9 leases has been granted by my Ministry over State Lands at Riambel as \nfollows – \n(i) \n155 for residential purposes; \n(ii) \n64 campement sites, and \n(iii) 10 for industrial purposes. \nI am also informed that all the sites are connected to the CEB and CWA networks. \n\n45 \n \n \nAs regard part (b), I am further informed that there are new squatters over State Land at \nRiambel. However, there are three cases of squatting within the Surinam ex-CHA Housing \nEstate which forms part of the bigger portion of State Land at Riambel. \n My Ministry is considering the possibility of regularising these three cases. In so far as \naccess to water and electricity is concerned, I understand that application should be made to \nthe CWA and CEB, respectively. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, okay. \nMr Babajee: Thank you, Madam Speaker. With regard to the 64 campements sites you \njust mentioned, hon. Minister, I have been informed that there are lots of them which are \nunoccupied and these places are being used as drug-trafficking areas. Will your Ministry \nconsider to have some site visits over there as they are bushy, they are neglected, there are lots \nof trees, bushes. Will your Ministry consider having a site visit over there so that we can check \nif those sites are being properly maintained or be used as I have just said? \nMr Mohamed: I am very thankful to the hon. Member who as usual is very meticulous \nwhen it comes to those issues. I would gladly go through the bushes with you. I mean to those \ncampements and we would look into it. I would gladly love the opportunity of doing so with \nthe other Members of the Constituency as well, and my officers. And if at all any campement \nsite is totally left abandoned, I see it as a changement de destination and as such, I would \nexplore the possibility of putting an end to those leases, rightly so. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, okay. \nThe hon. Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or! \n \nLE MÉRIDIEN HOTEL – DIVING CENTRE ACCIDENT 20 MARCH 2025 – \nINVESTIGATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/789",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 789,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/789) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre D'or) asked \nMinister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to the tragic accident which \noccurred on 20 March 2025 at a Diving Centre found within a hotel compound in the north of \nthe Island, he will state if his Ministry has investigated same and, if so, indicate the – \n(a) \noutcome thereof and actions, if any, taken to avoid any future mishap thereat, and \n(b) \nnumber of hotels registered under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, and – \n(i) \ntable the list thereof inspected since 20 March 2025, and \n(ii) \n indicate the number of contraventions booked.",
      "answer": "Mr Uteem: Madam Speaker, I am informed that on the 20 March 2025, a tragic \nworkplace accident occurred on the premises of Sagar Hotels and Resorts Ltd more commonly \n\n46 \n \n \nknown as Le Méridien Hotel located at Pointe aux Piments. The incident involved the \nexplosion of the diving cylinder which, unfortunately, caused the death of one person. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that on the same day, the National \nOccupational Safety and Health Department of my Ministry started an investigation on the site \nto determine the cause of accident. I am informed that the matter is still under investigation. \nThe Ministry is awaiting the testimony of a supervisor of the deceased who was out of town, \nas well as the report of the Forensic Science Laboratory on the gas cylinder that exploded. \nMadam Speaker, the police have informed my Ministry that, on the date of the accident, \nthe police conveyed the body to Dr. Jeetoo Hospital mortuary where an autopsy was carried \nout and the Principal Medical Officer certified the cause of death as ‘shock due to multiple \ninjuries’. According to information gathered by the police, it came out that the deceased was \nreplenishing one cylinder with compressed air by a compressor when the cylinder exploded. \nThe cylinder was secured by the police and sent to FSL on the same day for deeper analysis \nand investigation. My Ministry has been informed that the FSL completed its investigation on \n28 July 2025 – yesterday – and the report has been submitted to the police. My Ministry has \nrequested for a copy of this report as it may provide critical insight into the cause of explosion \nand also help the Ministry determine any breach as regards to compliance with the \nOccupational Safety and Health Act. \nMadam Speaker, under section 72 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act – \n“(3) No gas cylinder for corrosive gases shall be filled unless it has been examined or \ntested by a competent person at least once every 2 years and no gas cylinder for other \ngases shall be filled unless it has been examined or tested by a competent person at least \nonce every 5 years (…)” \nI am informed by the Police Department that the cylinder that exploded was purchased \non 07 September 2022 and the Director of the centre, Mr M. B. is qualified and possesses a \nvalid certificate to carry out verifications. He stated that the hydrostatic test is carried out after \n5 years as per guidelines of the manufacturer and the provision of OSH Act. \nMadam Speaker, although the law clearly provides that gas cylinders must be examined \nat least once every five years, it would appear that in practice, inspection and testing occur only \nonce every five years.  \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed that the officers of OSH undertake \nregular visits to places of work, including hotels. On average, visits are carried out at some 20 \n\n47 \n \n \nhotels yearly. As at 23 July 2025, 130 hotels are registered under Occupational Safety and \nHealth Act. \nIn respect to part (b)(i) and (b)(ii) of the question, I am further informed that officers of \nthe OSH have carried out visits at 12 hotels since March 2025 and no contravention has been \nestablished. I am tabling the list of the 12 hotels that have been inspected. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes? \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Will the hon. Minister inform the House \nregarding the number of officers posted in the Enforcement Section to cover whole Mauritius \nand if there has been any lack of OSH officers in the department – fact that you have just \nannounced 20 hotels are visited on a yearly basis despite having 135 hotels registered at the \nMinistry? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister? \nMr Uteem: I have been informed, Madam Speaker, that there are currently only 19 \nofficers posted at the Enforcement Division of the OSH at my Ministry and at least, 25 staff \nare required. We have made request for unfunded positions to be filled. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, briefly Dr. Aumeer. \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Since we are talking about tragic accidents \nwith regard to diving, diving may also cause serious decompression sickness. Will the hon. \nMinister consider formal implementation of hyperbaric oxygen treatment by hotels which offer \nlarge scale diving? Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Very good. \nMr Uteem: I will certainly convey this message and I will have to discuss with the \nMinister of Tourism and the Minister of Health. \nMadam Speaker: Of course, thank you.  \nYes, the hon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! Last question! \nMETRO EXPRESS LTD. – CONTRACTS AWARDED – ENTITIES –\nCONTRACTUAL VALUE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/790",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 790,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/790) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Metro Express Ltd., he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to the names of the individuals and \n\n48 \n \n \nentities having been awarded contracts for works related or incidental to the setting up and \noperation thereof, indicating the contractual value thereof, in each case.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, Metro Express Ltd was incorporated on 26 \nOctober 2016 as a public limited company. It is wholly owned by the Government of Mauritius \nand responsible for the implementation of a multimodal transport system by pioneering a new \nsector in the local transport industry through the development, financing, construction, \noperation and management of the Metro Express Light Rail Transit System in Mauritius under \nthe Metro Express project.  \nThe phase 1 and phase 2 of the Metro Express Project was financed by the Government \nof India, partly through a grant and partly through a Line of Credit. As part of the requirement \nwithin the funding through the Line of Credit Agreement with Government of India, the \nappointment of a Project Manager Consultant (PMC) was made and since this project was \nbeing financed by the Government of India, an Indian company, namely RITES, was selected \nby the Government of India and appointed by Government of Mauritius. \n The Government of Mauritius, under its G2G agreement with the Government of \nSingapore, enlisted the Singapore Cooperation Enterprise to provide Delivery Support and \nAdvisory Services (DSAS) to ensure that the concept design of the project was being \neffectively implemented by the EPC contractor. Under the DSAS, the scope of works \ncomprised of the design and construct delivery services, focused on design and contract \nmanagement integration, issues resolution, refinements, provision of technical support and \nbriefings and support the Metro Express Ltd (MEL) on other enabling aspects related to the \ndevelopment of the project and ensure that the concept design is effectively implemented. \nMadam Speaker, in view to operate the Light Rail Transit System, the services of \nconsultants were enlisted by MEL to capacity build and train the required staff for operation \nreadiness as follows – \n(a) \nSingapore Cooperation Enterprise, Singapore Mass Rapid Transit (SMRT) \nCooperation from September 2018 to September 2020 amounting to Rs296.5 \nmillion but paid in Singapore dollars; \n(b) \n Independent Safety Assessment (ISA) by Metro Transit Solution (MTS) for phase \n1, approximately Rs4.69 million, and  \n(c) \nSMRT Singapore Cooperation Enterprise and STRIDES for phase 2A, 2B, 2C for \napproximately Rs89.55 million. \n\n49 \n \n \nMadam Speaker, for the sake of time, I am tabling the full list of contractors who have \nbeen enlisted by MEL since its setting up with the names, dates, contract amount and nature of \nservice. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes? \nMr Jhummun: Can the hon. Minister inform the House whether, proper procedures have \nbeen followed in all these activities and if not, whether an inquiry will be opened? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Time and again, we hear about the methodology used by the \nMetro Express Ltd but I can certainly ask the officers based on the list that I have submitted to \ngive me a report on the processes followed for the award of these contracts. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. That’s it for this morning. I will suspend the Sitting for one and \na half hour! \nAt 1.00 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.35 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Please be seated! \nThe hon. Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nMORC. GREEN PARK, TERRE ROUGE – DRAINS, ROAD SIGNS & GREEN \nSPACE AMENITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/791",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 791,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/791) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to Morcellement Green \nPark, in Terre Rouge, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the District Council of \nPamplemousses, information as to whether consideration will be given for the – \n(a) \ncleaning of drains and bare lands;  \n(b) \ninstallation of road markings and traffic signs, and  \n(c) \nsetting up of a green space thereat and, if so, when and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Health and Wellness (Mr A. Bachoo): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with \nregard to part (a) of the question, the drains were last cleaned from 26 June to 30 June 2025. \nThe next exercise will be undertaken within a few weeks. \n\n50 \n \n \nAs regards road markings, I am made to understand that the hon. Member effected a joint \nsite visit with representatives of the TMRSU and the District Council. Road markings should \nbe undertaken as from next week and no right turn traffic signs would be fixed thereat. \nThe setting up of a green space at the said Morcellement is under consideration. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre d'Or! \nMORCELLEMENT BOUCAN, CAMP CAROL & REGIONS – IRREGULAR \nWATER SUPPLY – REMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/792",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 792,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/792) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to Morcellement Boucan, Camp \nCarol and surrounding regions in Grand Bay, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \nthe Central Water Authority, information as to the short and long terms remedial measures \nenvisaged to address the issue of severe irregular water supply prevailing thereat over the past \neight years, indicating the expected start and completion dates thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: M. le président, je suis informé par la Central Water Authority que \nMorcellement Boucan, Camp Carol et les régions environnantes de Grand Baie reçoivent un \napprovisionnement en eau intermittente, soit de 4 heures à 8 heures du matin et de 16 heures à \n20 heures le soir, en raison de l’insuffisance de la mobilisation des ressources en eau et de \npertes d’eau.  \nDe juin 2025 à ce jour, la CWA a enregistré quelques 350 plaintes concernant l’absence \nd’eau dans la région de Grand Baie et de Pereybère. \nM. le président, la CWA m’a informé qu’elle a remplacé environ 1.8 kilomètre \nd’anciennes canalisations le long de la route principale de Morcellement Boucan. En raison des \ncontraintes financières, toutes les routes secondaires de Morcellement Boucan n’ont pas pu être \nremplacées.  \nSuite à la pose d’environ 50 mètres de tuyaux le long de la route Adolphina, à \nMorcellement Boucan, une quinzaine de foyers, auparavant approvisionnés en eau par camion-\nciterne, reçoivent désormais l’eau du robinet.  \nConcernant la région de Camp Carol, j’ai été informé qu’il n’y a pas de problème majeur \nd’approvisionnement en eau, aucune demande de camion-citerne n’ayant été formulée. \nCependant, le réseau de Camp Carol étant principalement constitué de vieux tuyaux en \namiante-ciment, ceux-ci devraient être remplacés pour éviter les fuites régulières.  \n\n51 \n \n \nLa CWA m’a également informé que quelques 35 kilomètres de tuyaux ont été identifiés \ndans la circonscription no. 6 comme étant anciens et défectueux et devront être remplacés, sous \nréserve de la disponibilité de fonds. \n The Deputy Speaker: Yes. \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Can the hon. Minister inform the House \nwhy has the CWA, under the former government, allowed this problem to persist for nearly 8 \nyears despite repeated complaints from residents? Were there any systemic issues like \ncorruption hindering resolution at Grand Bay? Thank you. \nMr Assirvaden: M. le président, je pense que l’honorable membre a raison. Vous savez, \npendant des années, la CWA fut comme la cour du roi Pétaud. Chacun faisait ce qu’il voulait, \navec l’ancien General Manager, le fameux Monsieur Prakash Maunthrooa, comme chef \nd’orchestre.  \nDonc, l’opacité, l’indiscipline, le gaspillage et la corruption furent le quotidien de cette \norganisation. Nous sommes, aujourd’hui, encore à découvrir les frasques de l’ancienne \ndirection, avec les fameux R700 millions du pipe replacement programme.  \nLa Chambre est surement au courant que suite au rapport que nous avons reçu sur le \nréservoir de Cluny, 4 officiers ont été suspendus. Donc, nous sommes encore à découvrir et à \nmettre de l’ordre. Ça prendra, je suis sûr, quelques années encore pour mettre l’ordre qu’il faut. \nMais l’honorable membre a raison, oui, c’est vrai, cela rime à ce qu’on disait. \n The Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien! \nMV WAKASHIO SHIPWRECK – COMPENSATION & COMMISSION OF \nINQUIRY REPORT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/793",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 793,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/793) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the Wakashio Shipwreck, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as \nto – \n(a) \nwhere matters stand regarding the – \n(i) \ninquiry initiated thereinto, and  \n(ii) \npayment of the compensation due to people of the South East affected \ntherewith, and  \n\n52 \n \n \n(b) \nwhether the report of the Commission of Inquiry set up to look thereinto will be \nmade public.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, hon. Member. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, following the \ngrounding of the MV Wakashio off the South East coast of Mauritius on 25 July 2020, the \nShipping Division of the Ministry conducted a preliminary inquiry in accordance with the \nMerchant Shipping Act and the Merchant Shipping (Preliminary Inquiries and Formal \nInvestigation of Shipping Casualties) Regulations 2017.  \nThe purpose of the preliminary inquiry was to investigate the maritime accident and to \nmake recommendations for improving safety in Mauritius waters.  \nThe report of this preliminary inquiry was submitted on 27 August 2020. The \ninvestigation found that the main reason of the accident was because of failure of the captain \nto continuously monitor the ship’s position due to social distractions on the bridge. But, of \ncourse, there is more to it than meets the eyes because I have been told that there were false \nentries in the VHF logbooks of the Operation Room and of Pointe du Diable, where National \nCoast Guard is. So, that was mentioned in the light of information that was relayed to me. I am \nsharing it with the House. \nI am also informed by the Commissioner of Police that criminal investigation was \nconducted by the Police Department, whereby the captain and the chief officer of the ship were \narrested on 18 August 2020 and they were remanded to the police cell. On 20 December 2021, \nboth were charged for endangering the safe navigation in breach of Section 217 (8) (g) of the \nMerchant Shipping Act before the Intermediate Court. Both accused parties pleaded guilty to \nthe charge. On 27 December 2021, they were sentenced to 20 months of imprisonment. They \nmade no appeal against the sentence. They were released from jail and repatriated to India on \n30 December 2021. \nI am further informed that a court of investigation was set up on 18 September 2020 to \ninvestigate and to report on, inter alia, the circumstances leading to the grounding of the vessel, \nand on 15 September 2022, the court of investigation submitted its report. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, regarding part (ii) of the question, I am informed that over the \nperiod 2021 to 2022, the Japan Protection and Indemnity Club, insurer of MV Wakashio has \npaid compensation as follows – \n\n53 \n \n \n• \ntotal amount of USD 2,650,048 that was made on the 23 December 2021 to the 999 \nbeneficiaries comprising 198 applicant fishers, 107 fisher mongers and 624 \nregistered fishers. \nAccordingly, each affected fisher or fisher monger received around 130,000 as \ncompensation from the insurer, representing the full – that’s what the insurance company wants \nus to believe – and final settlement of all claims for loss of income, including damages to \nfishing gears, equipment and tackle for the period August 2020 to March 2021.  \n• \nA total of Rs22,108,000 from 26 January 2021 to 29 April 2022 to 1,246 individual \nclaimants such as artisanal jewellery makers, boat painters, skippers, hawkers and \nseafood collectors, that submitted the claims for compensation on the e-platform \nset up jointly by the Ministry and the then Ministry of Finance, Economic \nDevelopment and Planning on 14 August 2020. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard part (b) of the question, I am informed that the then \ngovernment decided that the report would not be made public in view of the fact that certain \ndocumentation contained in the report of the Court of Investigation were referred to the \nDirector of the Public Prosecution for action on the 09 April 2023.  \nI am further informed that the Office of the Director of the Public Prosecution has \ndirected the Commissioner of Police to investigate into possible offences based on the \nrecommendation of the report. I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that the report of \nthe Commission of Inquiry has not been made public, and so far, no inquiry has been initiated. \nI wish to reassure the firm that shortly, I will hold discussions with my colleague the Attorney \nGeneral and the hon. Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade \non this matter. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien! \nMr Lukeeram: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Could the hon. Minister, please, \ninform the House whether in connection with this matter, there is an inquiry still going on or \nnot? Thank you. \nDr. Boolell: As of now, no. From the report submitted by the Commissioner of Police it \nis clear and obvious that there is no on-going investigation. However, may I remind the House \nthat the Senior Assistant Director of Public Prosecutions on the 13 March 2023, impressed \nupon the then Commissioner of Police that certain inquiries have to be conducted in the light \n\n54 \n \n \nof false entries in the very high frequency log books of operation room and false entries in the \nVHF log book of Pointe du Diable. But, as you know, there has been no follow-up, no outcome \nand here, we are. You know, following the meeting which I will have with colleagues, then I \nwill convey the message to the Cabinet and then we will certainly look into as whether the time \nhas come to render the report public. \nThe Deputy Speaker: One last question on this item! \nMr Seeburn: Yes, thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Now, we know that the accused \nparties in this case have been convicted, is the hon. Minister prepared to inform the House \nwhether those individuals who resides in those areas and who have been affected and who have \nlodged a case then for the loss they have incurred, whether those individuals would have to \nproceed with their case individually or whether the Government will look into it? \nDr. Boolell: I cannot dispense advice in relation to the specific question you have asked \nbut I see no reason why they cannot lodge their case before the court. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, the hon. First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix! \nENSAFRICA MAURITIUS – ALLEDGED DISCRIMINATORY DISMISSAL – \nINQUIRIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/794",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 794,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/794) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, he will state if the cases of dismissal of \ntwo employees allegedly for wearing hijabs in their place of work have been reported to his \nMinistry and, if so, indicate – \n(a)  if inquiries have been initiated thereinto and, if so, where matters stand; \n(b)  the number of reported cases of similar discriminatory practices since 2022 to date \nand the outcome thereof in each case, and  \n(c)  if consideration will be given for the toughening of the existing legislation in \nrelation to similar practices.",
      "answer": "Mr Uteem: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with your permission I would reply to Parliamentary \nQuestion B/794 and B/810 concurrently as they relate to the same subject matter, that is, alleged \ndiscriminatory treatment and dismissal of two employees for wearing hijab in their place of \nwork.  \n\n55 \n \n \nI am informed that on 05 June 2025 and 06 June 2025, respectively, Ms M. A. and Ms N. \nA. who were employed at ENSafrica Mauritius, reported to my Ministry that they were \nprevented from wearing head scarfs (hijab) at their work place. On 13 June 2025 they were \nsuspended from work and on the same day they registered a complaint at my Ministry as they \nconsidered that they had been discriminated on religious grounds. \nMy Ministry convened the representative of ENSafrica Limited Mauritius on 25 June \n2025 to secure their version and they informed that there is a dress code which has been well \nestablished since the past 30 years and all employees of ENSafrica Limited Mauritius have to \nofficially adhere to same. The dress code is an implied term of their contract of employment. \nEmployees are not allowed to wear anything which is outside the dress code. However, they \npointed out that there was no written policy regarding dress code.  \nOn 02 July 2025, the aggrieved workers reported the existence of a labour dispute \nbetween themselves and ENSafrica Limited Mauritius to the President of the Commission of \nMediation and Conciliation under section 64(1) of the Employment Relations Act 2008 on \nwhether they should be allowed to wear head scarfs on their uniform at their workplace. \nConciliation meetings were held at the Commission on 07, 11 and 17 July. The workers were \npresent, assisted by their legal counsels. However, ENSafrica did not appear on the three \noccasions. On 18 July 2025, the Commission informed the workers and the employer that it \nwas of the view that a state of deadlock had been reached and the workers had requested the \nCommission to refer the matter to the Employment Relations Tribunal. \nHowever, on 21 July 2025, the Commission received a letter from ENS Mauritius \nLimited purported to be dated on 18 July 2025, which was a Saturday, terminating the \nemployment of the two workers. I am informed that on 22 July 2025, the two aggrieved workers \nregistered a complaint at my Ministry to the effect that their employment had been terminated \nby way of a letter dated 18 July, summarily, allegedly because they had been spreading false \nand misleading information about ENSafrica Limited which resulted in apparently threats \nbeing made to the safety of the members of the firm. \nThe workers requested that they be reinstated back to their post. On 23 July 2025, my \nMinistry conducted an inquiry at ENSafrica Mauritius and met with Mr Thierry Koenig, Senior \nAttorney, Director and Mr Maxime Sauzier, Senior Counsel, Chairman among others. The firm \nis agreeable to pay all dues prescribed by law upon termination of employment but are not \nagreeable to reinstate the workers. \n\n56 \n \n \nI wish to highlight, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that although one of the reasons of the \ntermination was misconduct, no disciplinary hearing was held for the employees to provide the \nworkers with the opportunity to answer any charge against them. I am also not aware if the \nemployer reported any alleged threat which they apparently had received to the police for \ninquiry. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, on 25 July 2025, my Ministry referred the matter to the \nEmployment Relations Tribunal to claim reinstatement of the workers. Concurrently, the \napplication to join the Workfare Programme has been referred to the Ministry of Social \nIntegration, Social Security and National Solidarity for payment of Transition Unemployment \nBenefit. \nMy Ministry has been informed by the Equal Opportunities Commission that Ms N. A \nand Ms M. A. also lodged individual complaints against their employers before the Equal \nOpportunities Commission on 25 and 30 June 2025. Both complainants alleged that they had \nbeen discriminated on the basis of their creed as they had been required by their employer to \nstop wearing their head scarfs at their place of work. ENSafrica Mauritius has yet to give their \nversion to the Equal Opportunities Commission. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (b) of the question, relating to similar cases of \ndiscrimination, I am informed that since 2022, there have been three cases reported to my \nMinistry as follows – \n• \nOn 10 March 2022, a bus conductor reported a case regarding request to have his \nSundays off to attend church services; \n• \nOn 03 April 2023, an educator of Muslim faith complained that he was denied \naccess to his workplace because of his beard, and  \n• \nOn 01 July 2025, the Private Enterprise Employees Union reported a dispute to the \neffect that employees of the National Social Inclusion Foundation were not being \nallowed to display any religious symbols on their office tables.  \nFollowing the intervention of my Ministry, the first two cases have been resolved to the \nsatisfaction of the workers and the third case is still under mediation. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, discrimination of workers cannot be tolerated in a plural society \nlike Mauritius. Section 11 of the Constitution guarantees a citizen’s right to practice his religion \n\n57 \n \n \nand section 16 of the Constitution protects every citizen against discrimination including on \nthe basis of creed and religion.  \nSection 5 of the he Worker's Rights Act 2019, very clearly provides that – \n“No employer shall treat, in a discriminatory manner, any worker who is in his \nemployment.” \nThe definition of “discrimination” includes affording different treatment to workers \nattributable, wholly or mainly, to their creed or religion. \nMoreover, Section 64 of the Worker's Rights Act 2019, further provides that an \nemployment cannot be terminated by an employer by reason of a worker’s race, colour, caste \nor religion. \nLet me reassure the House that this matter is being taken very seriously as highlighted in \nthe report of Cabinet Decision of 25 July 2025 – \n“Cabinet has taken note, with concern, of the case […] The possibility of action being \ntaken against the law firm is being examined.” \nMy Ministry is in consultation with the Attorney General’s office, working towards the \nreinforcement of labour legislations to prevent violation of the human rights of workers \nincluding such cases of discrimination.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, you have one supplementary? \nMr Lobine: Yes. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, taking into account that there are many cases \nthat are not reported due to fear of being dismissed from work, will the hon. Minister and his \nMinistry consider embarking on a national campaign to inform workers of this country that \nthey cannot be discriminated on the basis of caste, religion or religious belief? And, also to \ninform those employers who are perpetrating discrimination that this cannot continue in this \ndemocratic country.  \nMr Uteem: I thank the hon. Member for this very valuable suggestion. We will consider \nwith officers of my Ministry whether, to have this national campaign in MBC TV, through the \nmedia and the press.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, you have one supplementary? \nMr A. Duval: Yes, thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir.  \n\n58 \n \n \nMay I ask the hon. Minister, given that section 5 is an offence punishable under section \n123 by Criminal Punishment as the hon. Minister knows well, why has an interview not been \nconducted with ENSafrica under potential violation of section 5; the more so that the parent-\ncompany features on its website, at least five persons wearing hijab and, therefore, it suggests \nthat this is not a global policy but one which is local? So, why has there not been any action \nunder section 123? \nMr Uteem: The hon. Member will be happy to note that my Ministry has already referred \nthe matter to DPP for an advice, specifically on whether section 5 of the Worker’s Rights Act \nhas been breached and what legal action can be taken against ENSafrica in Mauritius. We are \nawaiting the advice of the DPP’s office.  \nWith regard to ENSafrica, my Ministry wrote to them officially to report this dispute and \nto ask whether, there was any dress code imposed by ENSafrica in South Africa and the answer \nwas no. \nI personally spoke to the Director of ENS South Africa. They are taking this very \nseriously and we are still hoping that, ENS Mauritius will come to better terms and reinstate \nthese workers.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: You have another one?  \nMr A. Duval: Yes. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, quickly! \nMr A. Duval: Now, with regard to the course of action that has been taken by the \nMinistry, that is, for reinstatement, as it is now doubtful that the bond of trust that existed \nbetween employer and employee still exists or will be able to resuscitated in the future, is the \nhon. Minister agreeable that this is the right time to make an example out of this sort of \npractice? Even if section 123 has not been utilised in the past, he should ensure that this time, \nan example is made. \nMr Uteem: Absolutely, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. That is why Cabinet took the decision \nto refer the matter to the Attorney General for advice as to what action can be taken against the \nlaw firm and also to consider whether, we need to make any amendment to our law. I \nunderstand you are referring to the provisions of the ERT with regard to reinstatement whether, \nit is the breakdown of relationship. All this is being looked into by the Attorney General’s \n\n59 \n \n \noffice and we will come with necessary amendments if it is required to reinforce the right of \nevery citizen of this country to dress in accordance with their religious belief.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay. \nThe hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues. \nFINANCIAL YEAR 2025-26 – FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE SCHEMES – \nARTISTS’ ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/795",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 795,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/795) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nArts and Culture whether, in regard to the eleven schemes included in Financial Year 2025–\n2026 in terms of financial assistance to artists, he will state – \n(a) the eligibility criteria to benefit therefrom, and  \n(b) if Rodrigues artists are eligible to apply thereunder and, if so, how and, if not, why \nnot.",
      "answer": "Mr Gondeea: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the eleven schemes which have been included \nin the Financial Year 2025-2026, have as overall objective, to provide structured financial \nsupport to artists across the Republic of Mauritius including Rodrigues with the aim of \npromoting artistic creation, professional development, international outreach and the \nsafeguarding and valorisation of our cultural heritage. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to clarify that there are currently nine \nschemes being implemented by my Ministry as follows – \n1. \nThe Scheme for Concerts; \n2. \nThe Scheme for Development of Performance Arts Group; \n3. \nThe International Development Grant Scheme for Performing Artists; \n4. \nThe Scheme for International Award; \n5. \nThe Scheme for International Competition Participation; \n6. \nOther Support to Artist Scheme; \n7. \nThe Production Grant Scheme; \n8. \nThe Emerging Talents Grant Scheme, and \n9. \nThe Research Grant Scheme.  \n\n60 \n \n \nEach of these schemes has its own eligibility criteria based on the specific objectives of \nthe schemes. With your permission, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am tabling the detailed criteria \nfor each of the nine schemes.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to highlight that three of these nine schemes namely the \nProduction Grant Scheme, the Emerging Talents Grant Scheme and the Research Grant \nScheme were previously being implemented under the Finance and Audit (National Arts Fund) \nRegulations 2017.   \nFollowing the measure announced in the Financial Year 2025-2026 to wind up all such \nfunds, provision has been made in the budget of my Ministry to honour the contractual \nobligations under these schemes already entered into the National Arts Fund with applicants. \nThe remaining two schemes namely, the Cultural Rebate Scheme and the Heritage Stewardship \nScheme are newly announced schemes in the 2025-2026 Budget and are being worked out in \nconsultation with stakeholders.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I also wish to inform the House that all the above schemes will \nbe reviewed during the forthcoming Assises des Arts et de la Culture which will be organised \nshortly by my Ministry. This national consultation platform will serve to finalise the design \nand implementation of the two new schemes and to assess the nine ongoing ones which may \nbe amended where necessary, to better align with the needs and expectations of the artists’ \ncommunity. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, I wish to inform that \nartists from Rodrigues are fully eligible to apply under all the schemes being implemented by \nmy Ministry. It is to be highlighted that for Financial Year 2025-2026, only one application \nfrom Rodrigues has been received as at date under the General Assistance Scheme Other \nSupport to Artists and which has been approved by the Ministry. \nMy Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry remains firmly committed to promoting inclusive \nand equitable access to opportunities for all artists across the Republic of Mauritius.  \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, one supplementary! \nMr Edouard: I thank the hon. Minister for his reply. May I ask the hon. Minister if \nrepresentatives from Rodrigues will participate in the Assises or will there be consultations in \nRodrigues itself?  Thank you. \n\n61 \n \n \nMr Gondeea: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, of course, they will be invited to participate in \nthe Assises des Arts et de la Culture.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay.  \nThe hon. Second Member for Savanne and Black River! \nKITESURFING – SAFETY & COMPLIANCE MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-18-march-2025",
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/796",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 796,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/796) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to kitesurfing, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the relevant authorities, information as to the required criteria for \nallowing the practice thereof in designated areas, indicating whether – \n(a) \nthe operators currently offering this activity are complying therewith, and \n(b) \nconsideration will be given for the taking of measures to ensure that adequate \nhealth and safety protocols are enforced. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Minister of Tourism!",
      "answer": "The Minister of Tourism (Mr R. Duval): Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. With \nyour kind permission, I will reply to both PQ B/796 and PQ B/805 together as they are related \nto the same subject matter. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Tourism Authority that kitesurfing is a \nsport activity which is practised throughout the year when the weather is windy. It is carried \nout mostly by tourists. I understand that there are currently 20 operators of rental agency for \nkitesurf registered with the Tourism Authority who are operating across the island. \nThe First Schedule of the Tourism Authority Act 2006 provides for an operator or of a \nrental agency of a kitesurf to hold a tourism enterprise license from the Tourism Authority. \nThere is no provision for individual kitesurfer, both local and tourists, to hold any authorisation \nto practice that activity.  \nFor individual kitesurfers not going through a rental agency, there is also no obligation \nlegally or otherwise for the coach or monitor to be present on-site for the practice of that \nactivity. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed by the Tourism Authority that the \noperation of a rental agency for kitesurf is regulated under Government Notice No. 328 of \n2021. These guidelines, which set the criteria, standards and procedures for the safe operation \n\n62 \n \n \nof the activity to be carried out by duly licensed rental agency, provide for the licensee to insure \nthe kitesurfers. \nThe kitesurfer is knowledgeable in the kitesurfing activities and is briefed on a code of \npractice which forms part of the guidelines, and fills and signs a disclaimer form before \ncarrying out kitesurfing activities. Moreover, the licensee should ensure inter alia that a register \nis kept with the details such as the – \n• \ndate of the activity; \n• \nname of the client; \n• \nNational Identity Card; \n• \npassport number; \n• \nage; \n• \ntime in and out; \n• \nsignature of the client, and \n• \nname of instructor if accompanied, etc.  \nSuch information should be readily available at a place where the kitesurfing activities is \ncarried out for inspection by an authorised officer of the Tourism Authority. \nAn inspection of all kitesurf boards, safety gears, rescue, craft and related equipment is \ncarried out to ensure that they are properly maintained and are in safe operating conditions. \nSafety devices are tested prior to carrying out kitesurfing activities or renting same to clients.  \nA signal system is going to be put in place, visible to all kitesurfers engaged in the activity \nto at least ensure constant communication with the kitesurfers to inform of weather conditions, \nof any changes thereof, or any other dangers, and constant look out is carried out throughout \nthe duration of the kitesurfing activities. \nI am also informed, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that the code of practice that the licensee is \nrightly required to brief any kitesurfer on the do’s or the don’ts of the activities, the hours of \noperation, the area where he is allowed to practice as well as the precautions to be taken.  \nWith your permission, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am tabling a copy of the guidelines for \nthe operating rental agency for the kitesurf and the code of practice. \n\n63 \n \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, legally, there is no designated area at sea for the activity to be \ncarried out. It can be practised both in the lagoon or off the lagoon. On spot monitoring is \ncarried out randomly by tourism enforcement officers to verify is the rental agency are \ncomplying with the prescribed guidelines. It is to be highlighted that the security boat and \nkitesurfing equipment of the rental agency are also verified to ensure compliance with the \nestablished checklist. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards to the health and safety measures, the guidelines \nprovide the following – \n• \nThe prevailing climatic and sea condition to be monitored continuously during \nthe activity to allow for sailing; \n• \nAvailability of signal system to inform persons carrying out kitesurfing activities \nof weather conditions and of any changes thereof; \n• \nVerification of equipment to ensure that they are safe for use; \n• \nAvailability of an emergency plan in case of accident; \n• \nWearing of an appropriate floatation device by kitesurfers to ensure safety at the \nsea; \n• \nThe kitesurfing instructor to be holder of a valid First Aid Certificate and \nLifesaving Certificate. \nThe Deputy Speaker: If the list is long, you can circulate the guidelines as well. \nMr R. Duval: Yes, if you want, of course.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Any supplementary question? Hon. Babajee! \nMr Babajee: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Will the hon. Minister consider \nintroducing a rescue team at the same spot as ‘Dangerous Bathing’ is written over there? \nNormally, people are disallowed to go and swim over there. If he can consider to put the same \nteam at Tamarin where everyone is surfing, especially when the sea is rough? \nMr R. Duval: Definitely, we will be looking at the matter. I must say that we have met \nwith the operators lately. We will be having more meetings in the following weeks. From there, \nwe will know where to go. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question! \n\n64 \n \n \nMr Babajee: Also, if the hon. Minister will consider or agree to introduce jet ski so as \nto save someone if he/she is in trouble – the coast guard has such vessels – as when people are \nkitesurfing, they are going too quick? \nMr R. Duval: I will consider. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d'Or! \nFALSE INFORMATION & FAKE PROFILES – PROLIFERATION –REMEDIAL \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/797",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 797,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/797) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in regard to \nthe circulation of false information and the use of fake profiles to disseminate same, amongst \nothers, he will state the urgent measures he proposes to take to address the issue and the risks \ninherent thereto, while preserving the sacrosanct principle of freedom of expression in \nMauritius.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I thank the hon. Member for this question. \nIndeed, the phenomenon of false information and the proliferation of fake profiles often \naccompanied by anonymous postings is creating significant disruption on social media and our \nsociety at large.  \nThis concern has been substantiated by the high number of cases reported to the Cyber \nCrime Unit between 2014 and 2024 as also indicated by the hon. Prime Minister in his reply to \nPQ B/715. \nIn fact, our legal framework, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, remains outdated. While the legal \nframework for many other countries like the UK, the European Union, France, Germany have \nactually been updated, our legal framework as of date does not define what really online harm \nis. Here, we are talking about the online harms. \nNevertheless, our laws provide for some parameters that deter unacceptable or unlawful \nonline behaviour. I would like to seize this opportunity also to inform the House and the \npopulation at large that the Cyber Security and Cyber Crime Act defines a fake profile as an \nuntrue online representation that is probably non-existent. \nUnder the same law, Section 16 criminalises the use of fake profile to cause harm, yet \nonline harms are not defined, with the penalties running up to Rs1 million or 20 years of penal \nservitude. \n\n65 \n \n \nTherefore, Section 23 mandates even the administrators of those social media platforms \nor groups to moderate and control undesirable online contents, which can be deceptive or \ninaccurate, that have been posted with an intent to defame or threaten, or abuse, or mislead the \npublic. It is important to know that it applies even to private WhatsApp groups as far as a \ntelecommunication device is being used in that communication process. The ICT Act at Section \n46 prohibits knowingly sending false or fraudulent messages. \nComing to the substantive part of the answer, over and above the measures mentioned \nby the hon. Prime Minister in his reply, the measures that we have put up are –  \n(i) \nUnder enhanced reporting and monitoring mechanism run by the CERT-MU we \nhave upgraded MAUCORS to MAUCORS+. It now allows people or agreed \nparties to provide more information so that the work of the police can get easier \nand so that we also able to undertake a lot of analytic work on that to define the \npatterns. \n(ii) \nSecondly, there is the establishment of a multistakeholder committee at the level \nof my Ministry which is attended also by the Police IT Unit and the Cybercrime \nUnit to monitor and follow up on incidents. \n(iii) \nWe are continuing with our sensitisation campaigns, targeting students, educators \nand the general public. This one has started in January and it is ongoing, and  \n(iv) \nthere are also security alerts when the CERT-MU identifies a message that can \nbe of seriously aggravating nature. \n(v) \nMy Ministry has also made a request to the police to operate and conduct effective \ncyber platforms through automated tools which are actually AI-powered on a 24/7 \nbasis, and lastly,  \n(vi) \nWe are also exploring mutual legal assistance to bring accused who are hiding \nbehind barriers, they are offshore and from there, they are actually disturbing our \nsocial construct in the country. So, we are exploring MLA to mutual legal \nassistance, and finally,  \n(vii) \nWe have also decided to establish the Cyber Resilience and Cybersecurity Unit \nwhich will look into this matter more deeply. \nAs for the second part of the question, the right to freedom to expression is guaranteed \nunder Section 12(1) of the Constitution and all actions that we are taking will be within \n\n66 \n \n \nconformity of this provision. But Section 12(2) also provides for reasonable limitations for the \nfreedoms of expression which are necessary to protect public order, security and rights of \nothers. \nTo conclude, we are looking at robust legal sanctions and ongoing legislative reforms in \ncoordination with the office of the Attorney General. There is enhanced reporting, investigation \nand law enforcement, there are public awareness and campaigns… \nThe Deputy Speaker: In a question you do not have to conclude. You just answer the \nquestion. You have already said all these? \nDr. Ramtohul: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with these measures aim to safeguard our digital \nspace and its integrity. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Any supplementary question? \nMr Etwareea: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, regarding this bone of contention, I would like \nto know whose responsibility it would be to handle the complaints reported by complainants? \nI would like to know exactly who is the watchdog when there are problems here. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Can you answer this question? \nDr. Ramtohul: Thank you. The CERT-MU is an agent that routes complaint to the \npolice. So, ultimately it is the police who has the responsibility to carry out the investigations. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, one supplementary question! \nMr Edouard: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, for many users social media is a \nlicence to defame. I understand that… \nMr Deputy Speaker: Put your question, please! \nMr Edouard: Yes, I must put the context because I have been informed that there is a \nproblem with cooperation with the police from the social media platform owners. Will the hon. \nMinister consider coming up with measures to force these platforms to cooperate with the \npolice when there are investigations? Thank you. \nDr. Ramtohul: I would not say that there are problems per say. We are putting in all our \nefforts together with the police to have the social media platform service providers to actually \ncomply to the provisions of our local legislations and the work that we are doing together with \nthe office of Attorney General is going into the direction as well. Thank you. \n\n67 \n \n \nMr Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet! \nARSENAL – MALAKOFF ROAD – DRAIN WORKS – DELAY & \nCOMPLETION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/798",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 798,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/798) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the closure of Malakoff Road in Arsenal for \ndrain works undertaken by Transinvest Construction Ltd, he will state the – \n(a) \nwork progress thereof; \n(b) \nreasons for the delay beyond the one-month expected completion date, and \n(c) \nnew expected completion date thereof and of reopening of the road.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Housing and Lands (Mr S. Mohamed): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with \nyour permission I shall reply to the Parliamentary Question B/798.  \nI am informed that the NSLD requested clearance from Traffic Management and Road \nSafety Unit to close Malakoff Road for a period of one month as from 17 March 2025 for the \nconstruction of a culvert. I am also informed that during implementation, the CWA and the \nCEB approached of the NSLD to use the trench which has been dug for pipe laying and \nextension of CEB underground network thus saving on costs. Also, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, \nworks related to the culvert were completed in March 2025. However, works being undertaken \nby the CWA and the CEB are still ongoing. \nIn regard to part (b), I am made to understand that there has been a slight delay due to \nclearances needed by CWA and the CEB from the Road Development Authority in regard to \nway leave across A4 road. \nAs regard part (c), I am informed by the NSLD that the works are scheduled to be \ncompleted by mid-September 2025 following which the road will be reopened. \nI would like to add, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that all this is in line with the construction \nof 2 NSLD sites: Arsenal 1 and Arsenal 2. Both of those sites clearly required some major \nroadworks such as I have just described and it is quite unfortunate that all this could have not \nbeen done in parallel with the construction but it had, since there was so much bad planning on \nthe part of the previous Government, it is only when we took office that you will note that \nletters were sent to all authorities seeking clearances for the work to start and that is why there \nhas been this closure and that is why there has also been a delay in the delivery  of houses by \n\n68 \n \n \nthe NSLD. Unfortunately, that particular area of Mauritius only but an example and there are \nmany more. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues! \nSTC RODRIGUES – TRAINING FACILITIES – PROMOTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/799",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 799,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/799) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Honourable \nMinister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the existing training \nfacilities for officers, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the State Trading \nCorporation (STC), information as to the grades of officers concerned therewith, indicating if \n– \n(a) \nsame are relevant for the promotion prospects thereof, and \n(b) \nofficers of the STC Rodrigues benefit therefrom.",
      "answer": "Mr Yeung Sik Yuen: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as the government trading arm, the State \nTrading Corporation (STC) starts with importing key essential and strategic commodities such \nas ration rice, wheat flour, petroleum products, liquefied petroleum gas, Basmati rice, milk \npowder, edible oil and pulses. \nI am informed that there are currently 240 officers at the STC of which 13 work in STC \nRodrigues. These officers are spread across 55 grades in various technical and administrative \ncadres. \nI am further informed that all these officers are given training facilities both in-house and \non-the-job. Over the last five years, these officers have received training in over 150 courses. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that only \nthe officers of the supplies and sales cadre are currently affected by this criterion. \nThe prescribed scheme of service for the different posts in the supplies and sales cadre \nof STC requires the officers to have a certificate or a diploma in purchasing and supply \nmanagement or procurement and supply management or logistic management to be eligible for \nthe promotion. \nI am further informed that in 2004, the STC sought the assistance of Polytechnics \nMauritius Ltd for the mounting of a specific course for the officers in the supplies and sales \ncadres. This will entitle them to receive either a certificate or diploma. This will entitle them \nto receive either a Certificate or a Diploma. Since October 2024, 21 supplies and sales officers \nof the STC in Mauritius, had enrolled in the certificate course on Sustainable Logistics and \nSupply Chain Operations. However, four of them have, since dropped out. Additionally, three \n\n69 \n \n \nother supplies and sales officers have enrolled in the diploma course on Sustainable Logistics \nand Supply Chain Operations. I am informed that both training courses are fully sponsored by \nthe STC. Once these officers have successfully completed their courses, they will be eligible \nfor promotion in the supply and sales cadre. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that there \nare six officers of the procurement and sales cadre in the STC Rodrigues who are required to \nbe trained. I am further informed that Polytechnics Mauritius has agreed to mount the training \nfor these officers in a specific delivery format which will include fly-in fly-out model for the \nfaculty along with selected face to face sessions facilitated by the team in Rodrigues. It is \nexpected that the courses will start by the end of August this year. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay. The hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 20 – MORC. LA CONFIANCE, BEAU BASSIN – FOOTBALL \nGROUND REHABILITATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/800",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 800,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/800) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the football ground found in \nMorcellement La Confiance, Beau Bassin, in Constituency No.20, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Municipal Council of Beau-Bassin-Rose-Hill, information as to \nwhether consideration is being given for the rehabilitation thereof and, if so, give details thereof \nand, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Health and Wellness (Mr A. Bachoo): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the \nanswer is in the positive.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Minister, you are Ag. Minister of Local Government? \nMr Bachoo: I am acting. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. It is for the record. \nMr Bachoo: The answer is in the positive. Due consideration is being given for the \nrehabilitation of the football ground found in Morcellement La Confiance, Beau Bassin. The \nfollowing works will have to be carried out for the reinstatement and returfing of the \nMorcellement La Confiance football ground – \n(i) \nSupply and spread of topsoil, including the levelling and preparation of the \nground; \n\n70 \n \n \n(ii) \nSupply of grass, including planting, watering and maintenance, and \n(iii) \nFixing of goal post, removal of hoarding  and reinstatement of part of the \nsurrounding area. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, supplementary! \nMr Quirin: M. le président, je sais que l’honorable ministre n’est pas le ministre \nresponsable de ce dossier, mais peut-il quand même indiquer à la Chambre est-ce qu’il a une \ndate à laquelle ce terrain sera réhabilité et surtout, mis à la disposition des jeunes de cette \nrégion ? \nMr Bachoo: A site visit was conducted by the officers of the Ministry, together with the \nMunicipal Council of Rose Hill and work is going to start very soon. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The Table has been advised that PQ B/801 has been withdrawn.  \nSo, we go to PQ B/802. The hon. Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien! \nMORC. LE HAMEAU, BEAU PLAN – ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT \nLICENCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/801",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 801,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/801) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked the \nMinister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in regard to \nMorcellement Le Hameau situated at Beau Plan, he will state if the promoters thereof were \nrequired to obtain an Environment Impact Assessment Licence prior to developing same and, \nif not, why not, indicating whether his Ministry is aware that the plots of land of the said \nMorcellement have been sold as part of a morcellement development.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMARE D'ALBERT SWIMMING POOL – RENOVATION & REPAIR WORKS – \nREOPENING DATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/802",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 802,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/802) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the ongoing renovation and repair \nworks being carried out at the Mare d'Albert Swimming Pool, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Mauritius Sports Council, information as to where matters stand, \nindicating the expected reopening date thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Mauritius Sports \nCouncil that the Mare d'Albert Swimming Pool is closed since June 2024 to allow for major \n\n71 \n \n \nrepair works, specifically the servicing of the boiler and replacement of an electric control \npanel. These works have now been completed. Pre-commissioning of the electrical control \npanel has been completed. The MSC is currently awaiting the replenishment of the pool to \ncarry out the final commissioning of the boiler and the electric control panel which is expected \nto be completed in the coming days. Thereafter, an engineer and a Safety Health Officer will \nassess the safety and stability for use. In the event the report is in the affirmative, it is expected \nthat the swimming pool will be ready for reopening by end of August 2025. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, supplementary! \nMr Apollon: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Can the hon. Minister inform the \nHouse since when the swimming pool was not operational? \nMr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as I stated in my reply, the Mare d'Albert \nSwimming Pool is not operational since June 2024. The House may wish to note that after I \nassumed office last November, I took cognizance of the numerous representations made on the \ndeplorable condition of the pool. I effected a site visit accompanied by hon. Members of that \nconstituency where indeed, I witnessed its unacceptable state, including the green water of the \npool. Not only was the pool impracticable, it was also a potential health hazard, being a \nbreeding ground for mosquitoes and bacteria.  \nI immediately impressed upon the Mauritius Sports Council which managed the facility, \nto initiate urgent action for the prompt remedy of the situation. Consequently, procurement \nexercise was initiated and the issues that were hindering the operation of the pool have now \nbeen addressed. Thus, the facility is now expected to be operational soon.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry will further upgrade the facility through additional \ncivil works such as replacement of tiles, flush door, bird deterrent system. The scope of works \nis being worked out. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nFOUNDATION PROGRAMME – LITERACY, NUMERACY & SKILLS – \nRODRIGUAN EDUCATORS’ EMPOWERMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/803",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 803,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/803) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nEducation and Human Resource whether, in regard to the Foundation Program in Literacy, \nNumeracy and Skills, he will state where matters stand regarding the – \n(a) \ntraining programs scheduled for the empowerment of educators of Rodrigues; \n\n72 \n \n \n(b) \nrequired resources for an effective implementation of the program, and \n(c) \ntransfer of secondary 9E+ students to the Mauritius Institute of Training and \nDevelopment.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Foundation Program in Literacy, \nNumeracy and Skills was introduced in January 2025 in grade 7, 8 and 9 to replace the former \nExtended Programme which was not adapted to the needs of those students who did not pass \ntheir PSAC examination. From 2022 to 2024, around 7,419 students who had enrolled in the \nExtended Programme exited the education system with neither a PSAC nor a NCE certificate. \nAllow me to provide the House with a few figures related to the performance of our \nstudents in Rodrigues – \n• \nin 2022, only 3 out 167; \n• \nin 2023, only 21 out of 204, and \n• \nin 2024, only 7 out of 209 \nextended stream students who had enrolled for the NCE exam, passed it. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, thus, out of the 580 students who took the NCE exam in \nRodrigues, only 31 were successful. This new foundation programme is offered to those \nstudents who have not obtained their PSAC at the National Qualification Framework (NQF) \nLevel 1. It offers a blend of academic knowledge and vocational skills that will ensure the \nprogression of students to the Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) system \nstream. Henceforth, all students completing the Foundation Programme in Literacy, Numeracy \nand Skills in 2025 will be awarded a Foundation Certificate which will be pitched at the NQF \nLevel 2. This certificate will enable the students to enrol in a Specialised National Certificate \nLevel 3 courses at the MITD training centres. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that two \nworkshops were conducted this year, for this training of around 169 educators in Rodrigues \nduring the month of January and May 2025 respectively. In addition, meetings and discussions \nwere also held with around 30 Rectors, Deputy Rectors, Senior Educators for the Foundation \nProgram in Literacy, Numeracy and Skills Development. Work sessions were also held with \nthe Departmental Head, Commission of Education and other stakeholders in Rodrigues. A third \nworkshop, focusing on elective subjects, is scheduled for the third week of August 2025 and \nwill be conducted by the lecturers from the MIE. \n\n73 \n \n \nWith regard to part (b), I am informed that both the MIE and the Mahatma Gandhi \nInstitute have developed full sets of curriculum content for all subjects, including electives. \nThe curriculum has been divided into three clusters, namely – \n(i) \nFunctional literacy and numeracy; \n(ii) \nLife skills and values, and \n(iii) Trade and livelihood skills. \nThese materials are available on the MIE website and educators in Rodrigues have \nalready been trained on how to access and use them effectively. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry has also released funds through the Private \nSecondary Education Authority (PSEA) with each school in Rodrigues receiving a sum of \nRs15,000 to print and distribute materials to students. A second disbursement will be made in \nAugust 2025. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (c), I am informed that as at now, there are \napproximately 141 students in grade 9 and 163 students in grade 9+ in Rodrigues. These \nstudents are expected to begin their training at MITD centres as from 2026. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Yes, the hon. Fourth Member for Port Louis. \nMs Anquetil:  Il n’est pas là ! Il n’est pas là! \nThe Deputy Speaker: He is not here. \nMs Anquetil:   Cela a été transféré au PM. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, it has been transferred to the Prime Minister. \nKITE SURFING – LICENSING & SUPERVISION REQUIREMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/804",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 804,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives",
      "question": "(No. B/804) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives whether, in regard to the \nofficial overseas missions he has undertaken since November 2024 to date, he will, in each \ncase, state the – \n(a)  dates, purpose and country/countries visited;  \n(b)  composition of the delegation, and  \n\n129 \n \n \n(c)  \ncost incurred in terms of – \n(i)  \nair tickets;  \n(ii)  accommodation;  \n(iii)  per diem allowances, and  \n(iv)  cars put at the disposal thereof, if any.",
      "answer": "Reply (The Prime Minister): The hon. Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives has \neffected 4 overseas missions to date as follows – \n(i) \n21st General Session of African-Asian Rural Development Organisation (AARDO) \nConference, and the 77th and 78th Sessions of the AARDO Executive Committees, \nheld from 19 to 24 February 2025 in New Delhi, India; \n(ii) \nThe Commonwealth Trade Ministers Meeting, held in Namibia from 18 to 20 June \n2025; \n(iii) Corporate Council on Africa’s 2025 US-Africa Business Summit in Angola from \n22 to 25 June 2025, and \n(iv) International Trade Centre Global SME Ministerial Meeting, held from 22 to 24 \nJuly 2025 in Johannesburg, South Africa. \nAs regards parts (b) and (c) of the question, the information requested for is being placed \nin the Library of the National Assembly.",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/805",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 805,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/805) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to kite surfing, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the relevant authorities, information as to whether a person is required to \nhold a valid licence in order to practice same on his/her own in our lagoons, further indicating \nif the presence of a coach or monitor is required onsite for those practicing same.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/796) \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Rodrigues, Ms Collet! \n\n74 \n \n \n2025 INTER-COLLEGE SPORTS COMPETITION– COST, HANDISPORT \nINTEGRATION & RECURRENCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/806",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 806,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/806) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nYouth and Sports whether, in regard to the 2025 Inter-College Games held from 14 to 18 July \nat the Côte d’Or National Sports Complex and other venues, he will state – \n(a) \nthe total budget allocated and actual expenditure incurred therefor;  \n(b) \nthe specific initiatives taken to promote values of discipline, inclusion, and drug \nprevention through the Games;  \n(c) \nwhether and how handisport disciplines were integrated thereinto, including the \nnumber of participating students with disabilities and support provided, and  \n(d) \nwhether the Inter-College Games will become an annual event.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Inter-College Sports Competition 2025 \nwas a joint collaboration between my Ministry and the Ministry of Education and Human \nResource. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, some Rs2 million was \nspent. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, prior to the holding of \nthe final of the Inter-College Sports Competition 2025, several coordination meetings were \nheld, comprising officers of my Ministry, Educators, Rectors from schools that had qualified \nfor the final as well as officers from the Mauritius Police Force and the Mauritius Fire and \nRescue Service, where matters such as discipline, respect of the rules of the competition and \ngood behaviour were raised and discussed. \nDuring the finals, Police Officers from several divisions, along with the Mauritius Fire \nand Rescue Service officers, security officers of the Mauritius Multisports Infrastructure Ltd, \nEducators and accompanying staff, ensured a secure and disciplined environment for athletes \nand supporters at all competition sites. The venue was physically accessible to people with \ndisabilities, and the organising team ensured that no athletes or supporters were discriminated \nbased on his/her social background, schooling, gender, physical appearance and otherwise. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (c) of the question, the House will appreciate \nthe fact that this is the first edition of the inter-college competition that this Government has \norganised in its endeavour to revive this competition. As such, this first edition did not cater \nany special event for a student with disabilities. That being said, both my Ministry and the \n\n75 \n \n \nMinistry of Education and Human Resource are considering special events for handisport \ndisciplines in future editions for the Inter-College Sports Competition. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (d) of the question, I can inform the House \nthat the Inter-College Sports Competition will be an annual event. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, do you have a supplementary? \nMs Collet: M. le président, l’honorable ministre peut-il fournir des précisions quant aux \ndépenses totales engagées pour l’organisation des finales nationales de l’Inter-College Sports \nCompetition, lesquelles ont permis à plusieurs jeunes athlètes prometteurs originaires de \nRodrigues de se démarquer ? \nMr Nagalingum: The Ministry of Youth and Sports spent Rs1.4 million, and the \nMinistry of Education spent Rs650,000. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nMAURITIUS JUDO FEDERATION – GENERAL ASSEMBLY (11 JULY 2025) – \nMEMBERS COMPOSITION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/807",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 807,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/807) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the General Assembly of the Mauritius \nJudo Federation held on 11 July 2025, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nFederation, information as to the – \n(a) \nnames of the elected members, and  \n(b) \nnumber of clubs which took part in the election.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, on 13 July 2025, my Ministry received an \nemail from the Mauritius Judo Federation informing my Ministry that it had held a special \nGeneral Assembly on 11 July 2025 at its registered seat at Dojo, at Grand River North West. \nWith respect to part (a) of the question, I am tabling the composition of the newly elected \nManaging Committee, as submitted by the said federation. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with respect to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the \nMauritius Judo Federation that 13 clubs took part in this election. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I also wish to inform the House that in accordance with Section \n3 (a) and 3 (b) of the Second Schedule of the Sports Act 2016, there exists a specific statutory \nprovision which sports federations are required to comply with when convening a General \n\n76 \n \n \nAssembly. In light of this recent notice of meeting, circulated by the Mauritius Judo Federation, \nmy Ministry has found it prudent to seek the advice of the Attorney General’s Office to \nascertain whether all the prescribed notification period and procedural requirement have been \nduly observed. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that I have personally committed to \nseek a fair and acceptable resolution to the ongoing issue affecting the Mauritius Judo \nFederation. To this end, I have convened and chaired more than three mediation meetings in \nan effort to bring the parties together. It is, in my view, wholly unacceptable that \napproximatively 18 judo clubs continue to be denied official recognition by the federation \ngoverning body. This situation is detrimental not only for the development of the sport, but \nalso to the athletes and stakeholders involved.  \nI would like to inform the hon. Members that the matter is currently before the Sports \nArbitration Tribunal with the hearing scheduled for Thursday 31 July 2025. I remain confident \nthat the issue will be resolved in the coming days. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes! \nMr Quirin: M. le président, est-ce que l’honorable ministre est en train de confirmer que \nson ministère n’a pas été informé au préalable de la tenue de cette Assemblée générale élective \nde la Fédération de Judo? \nMr Nagalingum: No, we were not, because there is no reason for any federation to tell \nus when they are going to hold their election. So, we learnt it afterwards. \nMr Quirin: M. le président, je pense que c’est la moindre des choses. Mais si le ministre \ntrouve que c’est normal, je n’en dirai pas plus. \nDonc, dans l’éventualité, M. le président, où le Tribunal Arbitral du Sport donne gain de \ncause dans un proche avenir aux 18 clubs de judo que la Fédération refuse… \nThe Deputy Speaker: No, this is speculating. Hon. Member, the case is before the \nTribunal. We cannot predict or…. \nMr Quirin: Non, mais on peut quand même… \nThe Deputy Speaker: …speculate what will happen. \nMr Quirin: Écoutez la fin de ma question. Vous allez comprendre pourquoi je la pose. \nLe ministre peut-il envisager de demander l’annulation des résultats que… \n\n77 \n \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: This is a speculative question. You have to await the outcome of \nthe Tribunal. Then, the Minister will decide what to do. You ask the question after the outcome \nof the Tribunal. Thank you. \nMr Nagalingum: The question is hypothetical. When we come to the bridge, we will \ncross it. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nMINISTERIAL VISIT TO RODRIGUES – PURPOSE & OUTCOME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/808",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 808,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/808) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nNational Infrastructure whether, in regard to the recent official visit he undertook to Rodrigues \ntogether with an accompanying delegation, he will state the – \n(a) \npurposes and outcomes thereof; and  \n(b) \nlist of National Development Unit projects awarded and, in each case – \n(i) \ngiving details of the initial date of conception thereof; and  \n(ii) \nwhether any delay occurred in the implementation thereof and, if so, the \nreasons thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I would \nlike to inform the House that purpose of my mission to Rodrigues was to renew the \nMemorandum of Understanding between the RDA and the Commission for Public \nInfrastructure, Transport and Housing of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly, which expired in \n2024. \nFurthermore, the mission team was tasked to carry a monitoring and evaluation exercise \nfor projects that were being implemented by the National Development Unit as well as Land \nDrainage Authority at various locations in Rodrigues. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I also had the privilege to attend a high-level presentation of the \nInception Report on the Land Drainage Master Plan on Wednesday 31 July 2025 in the \npresence of the Deputy Chief Commissioner of Rodrigues, representatives from the Ministry \nof National Infrastructure, Land Drainage Authority, Road Development Authority, \nCommission for Public Infrastructure, Commission for Agriculture, Rodrigues Public Utilities \nCommission, Rodrigues Regional Assembly and the consultant Société d'études techniques et \néconomiques (Setec), amongst others.  \nThe delegation conducted field visits to several key sites across Rodrigues, namely – \n\n78 \n \n \n• Baie Malgache; \n• Camp du Roi; \n• Pont-la-Digue; \n• Anse aux Anglais ; \n• Rivière Anse Raffin, and \n• Cascade Victoire 1 et 2, where the consultant, Setec, has installed hydrometric \ninstruments to monitor real-time water flow and rainfall patterns as part of the \nbroader Flood Risk Assessment Strategy. \nThe team also carried out various site visits for drain works at Quatre Vents, Anse aux \nAnglais and Acacia, raising of ford at Baie Topaze, Pistache, Mourouk 1 and 2, Diamant 1 and \n2, and at Grand Baie. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards to part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House \nthat the contract for the formulation of the Land Drainage Masterplan for Rodrigues has been \nawarded to Setec, a French consultancy firm. The overall objective of the LDMP is to build \nclimate resilience and reduce Rodrigues’ vulnerability to flooding, taking into consideration \nthe island’s specificity. The project was launched on 13 March 2025 and the inception report \nwas submitted in July 2025. The launching of three projects, namely – \n(i) \nDrain works at Quatre Vents Dans Darisse ; \n(ii) \nRaising of ford at Baie Topaze, and \n(iii) \nRaising of ford at Pistache was held at Pistache by myself in the presence of the \nChief Commissioner and Deputy Chief Commissioner in presence of local \ninhabitants and representatives from various institutions. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have to inform the House that the following projects will be \nimplemented by the National Development Unit subject to availability of funds –  \n(i) \nPort Mathurin Phase 3; \n(ii) \ndrain works at Anse aux Anglais; \n(iii) \nraising of ford at Diamant 1 and 2; \n(iv) \nraising of ford at Grand Baie; \n(v) \nraising of ford at Mourouk 1 et 2; \n(vi) \nraising of ford at Baie du Nord; \n(vii) \n raising of ford at Rivière Cocos, and \n(viii) drain works at Acacia. \n\n79 \n \n \nWith your permission, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am tabling the full details of the above \nprojects. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix! \n2030 RENEWAL ENERGY ROADMAP – IMPLEMENTATION – PROJECTS & \nFEASIBILITY STUDIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/809",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 809,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/809) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the implementation of the 2030 \nRenewal Energy Roadmap published in 2022, he will state – \n(a)  where matters stand regarding the setting up of a planned 50 MW Offshore Wind \nFarm, as announced by the previous Government, and  \n(b)  the number of projects and expressions of interests obtained as at to date regarding \nocean renewables like offshore wind farms and wave and tidal power plants, giving \ndetails of reports and feasibility studies and recommendations available in relation \nthereto, if any.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: M. le président, je voudrais tout d’abord informer la Chambre qu’une \nnouvelle feuille de route pour les énergies renouvelables est actuellement en cours de révision. \nL’objectif fixé par l’ancien régime était d’atteindre 60 % d’énergie renouvelable dans notre mix \nénergétique d’ici 2030 parallèlement à la suppression progressive du charbon. Nous sommes \nactuellement, malheureusement, à moins de 18 % d’énergie renouvelable et cet objectif n’est \ndonc ni réaliste, ni réalisable. \nMon ministère, M. le président, a obtenu l’assistance de l’Agence internationale pour les \nénergies renouvelables (IRENA) pour la révision de cette feuille de route pour les énergies \nrenouvelables, qui sera également alignée sur le nouveau plan stratégique pour l’énergie \nrenouvelable en cours de finalisation par la MARENA. \nConcernant la partie (a) de la question, je suis informé qu’une assistance technique a été \nobtenue en 2023 auprès de l’université technique danoise pour la réalisation d’une étude de \npréfaisabilité sur l’énergie éolienne offshore à Maurice. Dans le cadre du Fonds conjoint pour \nles objectifs de développement durable (ODD), le rapport soumis en décembre 2023 proposait \nle développement d’un parc éolien offshore fixé à 100 MW au nord de l’île Maurice, entre l’île \nPlate et l’île Coin de Mire. J’ai également été informé qu’en juin 2024, l’année dernière, \n\n80 \n \n \nl’université technique danoise a élaboré un avant-projet pour le développement d’un parc \néolien offshore de 100 MW.  \nCet avant-projet prévoit les spécifications techniques générales relatives aux fondations, \naux éoliennes, à l’aménagement d’un parc, au chemin des câbles et au raccordement du réseau. \nLa prochaine étape consiste à réaliser une étude de faisabilité détaillée sur une évaluation \npréliminaire de l’impact environnemental et social. Mon ministère est actuellement en train \nd’obtenir le financement nécessaire. \nConcernant la partie (b) de la question, j’ai été informé, M. le président, que MARENA \na lancé en 2021 une manifestation d’intérêt pour des services de conseil nécessaire et une étude \nde faisabilité sur les technologies d’énergies renouvelables océaniques en république de \nMaurice. Malheureusement, le projet n’a pas eu de suite. \nJ’ai également été informé que MARENA dans le cadre de son programme national pour \nles concepts de projets émergeants basés sur les technologies d’énergies renouvelables a retenu \nune candidature d’un projet de conversion de l’énergie thermique des mers (ETM). Ce projet \nbénéficie du soutien du gouvernement japonais pour le développement d’une installation ETM \nterrestre à 1 MW, destiné à fournir l’énergie renouvelable et une production d’énergie de base. \nHormis ce qui précède, M. le président, j’ai été informé qu’aucune autre étude n’a été réalisée \nsur les énergies renouvelables maritimes. \nM. le président, le nouveau plan stratégique et la feuille de route des énergies \nrenouvelable fourniront une indication des technologies à adopter du calendrier en fonction de \nleur maturité et leur faisabilité économique et technique. \nENSAFRICA (MAURITIUS) LTD – MS N.A. & MS M.A. – DISCRIMINATORY \nTREATMENT & DISMISSAL – INQUIRIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/810",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 810,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/810) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in relation to the \nalleged discriminatory treatment and dismissal of Ms N.A. and Ms M.A. by ENSafrica \n(Mauritius) Ltd., he will state if the matter has been reported to his Ministry and, if so, if \ninquiries have been initiated thereinto and, if so, indicate where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Vide reply to PQ B/794) \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Savanne and Black River! \n \n\n81 \n \n \nFISH FARMING – LICENCES – HAZARDS – VANDALISM CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/811",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 811,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/811) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard \nto fish farming, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Fisheries Planning and \nLicensing Division, information as to the – \n(a)  names of the companies having been issued licences therefor;  \n(b)  regions where same is currently carried out, indicating the species of fish farmed \nand the potential hazards these species may pose to the local marine flora and fauna, \nand  \n(c)  whether cases of fish escaping from fish cages as a result of vandalism or adverse \nweather conditions have been reported.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: I thank the hon. Member for putting the question. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I \nseek your indulgence, I will circulate the reply. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Supplementary question? \nThe hon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet! \nMORCELLEMENT ST ANDRÉ – FOOTBALL GROUND – RENOVATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/812",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 812,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/812) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked the \nMinister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Morcellement St André Football Ground, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to if consideration will be given for \nthe renovation thereof, including remedying the defective lighting thereat and, if so, indicate \nthe expected start and completion dates thereof.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Health and Wellness (Mr A. Bachoo): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with \nyour permission, as Acting Minister of Local Government, I shall reply to this question. The \nanswer is in the affirmative. \nAs regard to the lighting system thereat, I am informed that this issue is being addressed. \nThe expected starting date of replacement of flood lights is 04 August 2025. The project is \nexpected to be completed within two months of the award of the contract. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River! \n \n\n82 \n \n \nLE MORNE PUBLIC BEACH – BETWEEN THE RIU & ST REGIS HOTELS – \nRENOVATION OF EXISTING AMENITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/813",
      "sitting_id": "29-july-2025",
      "date": "2025-07-29",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 813,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/813) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in regard to \nLe Morne Public Beach, especially, at the stretch between the Riu and St Regis hotels, he will \nstate if consideration will be given for the – \n(a)  renovation of the existing toilets and provision of electricity and water thereat, and  \n(b)  installation of – \n(i)  \nshowers;  \n(ii)  shops for beach hawkers selling food and drinks, and  \n(iii)  a mess room for the toilet cleaners.",
      "answer": "Mr Bhagwan: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed by the Beach Authority that the toilet block was constructed in 2008 and is fully \noperational. The building is structurally sound and is maintained by the cleaning contractor \nKeep Clean Ltd. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard to the provision of electricity, I am informed that the \nCEB has initiated a project for the installation of a new underground electricity network from \nthe entrance of Le Morne Heritage Site up to Le Morne Brabant public beach. Works are \nexpected to be completed in the near future. \nConcerning water supply to the toilet block, I am informed by the Beach Authority that \na new CWA meter has been installed on 16 July 2025 and water supply is now available in the \ntoilet block. In case of shortage of water supply, the cleaning contractor together with the CWA \nprovide water tankers regularly to ensure that the toilet block is functional and kept in a clean \nand hygienic state for the benefit of all beach users. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, concerning part (b)(i) of the question, I am informed by the \nBeach Authority that there are actually no showers. Consideration is being given for the \nprovision of same in the very near future. Regarding part (b) (ii) of the question, the Beach \nAuthority is working on a project with regard to same. With regard to (b) (iii) of the question, \nthe matter has been discussed to the cleaning contractor for the provision of a decent facility to \nthe toilet cleaner. \n\n83 \n \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, supplementary? \nMr Babajee: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker. Can the hon. Minister consider to provide \na small space or a room for the Ministry of Tourism as this is the place where the kite surfers \nare growing in numbers and we can have a small rescue team over there? \nMr Bhagwan: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we are planning a site visit very soon with the \nMinistry of Tourism, the Local Authority to look into all the development of the site. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, now we go to question B/779 to be replied by the hon. \nMinister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade. \nHon. Etwareea, put your question B/779! It was addressed to the hon. Prime Minister but \nit will be answered by the hon. Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and \nInternational Trade.  \nAFRICAN UNION – AFRICAN RATING AGENCY – LAUNCHING IN \nSEPTEMBER 2025",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-29-july-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/814",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 814,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/814) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mr. N. J. brought \nby the Police for questioning at the Central CID on 12 September 2025, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information \nas to the reasons therefor, indicating – \n(i) \nwhether the constitutional rights of the latter were respected, and  \n(ii) \nwho gave instructions for the house search of Mr N.J., and  \n(b) \nstate whether he has been provided with an independent report of the said \nincident.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat on 29 August 2025, Mrs K.D.J.H., Officer-in-Charge of the Mauritius Investment \nCompany, made a declaration at the Central CID regarding an article on Scoop.mu. That was \non 29 August.   \nOn 11 September of the same year, that is, this year, another declaration was lodged by \none Mr T.S., CEO of Elysium Capital, concerning posts against him on the same platform. \nBoth cases were formally recorded for breach of the Information and Communication \nTechnologies Act. \nI am further informed by the Police that they attempted to obtain the statement of Mr N. \nJ., the alleged author of these posts, by calling him over the phone several times, but I am \ninformed that he was unreachable. As per the established practice, a case conference was held \nat the level of the Central CID, comprising senior most officers where it was decided to make \nan application for a search warrant under breach of Section 46(1)(ga) of the Information and \nCommunication Technologies Act at the Curepipe District Court.  \nThe Commissioner of Police was not informed of the decision taken by the Police \nOfficers.   \n\n24 \n \nOn 12 September 2025, on the basis of the search warrant, four Central CID Officers in \none police vehicle proceeded to the residence of Mr N.J. There was also another vehicle of \nthe Divisional Crime Intelligence Unit on the spot. I am informed that Mr N.J. was told of the \npurpose of the visit of the Police. He was requested to hand over his communication and IT \nequipment. I am informed that Mr N.J. grew vexed and threw his two mobile phones on the \nfloor. Subsequently, electronic equipment including the two mobile phones, suspected to have \nbeen used in the commission of the alleged offences, was secured for examination. \nMr N.J. voluntarily accompanied Police Officers at the Cybercrime Unit and he \nadmitted being the author of the posts. I am informed by the Police that he was informed of \nhis constitutional rights, including the right to silence and to legal representation, which I am \ntold he exercised. I am also informed that he was provided with communication facilities to \ncontact his lawyer at the Central CID.  After examination of the two mobile phones, they \nwere handed over to Mr N.J. and he was later allowed to go after the enquiry. Investigations \nin both cases are ongoing.    \nMadam Speaker, ever since the beginning of the mandate of this Government, I made it \nclear on numerous occasions, that both in this House and during my address to the Nation on \n01 January of this year, that I consider respect for human rights and the application of Section \n5(1) and Section 5(2) of the Constitution as the bedrock of any civilised society. \nUnder no circumstances will the Government allow any violation of human rights as we \nsaw under the previous regime. My Government will always uphold the sanctity of human \nrights and dignity of all our citizens. \nTherefore, I asked the Commissioner of Police to carry out an enquiry into the action \ntaken by the Police Officers. Upon the outcome of the enquiry, appropriate disciplinary \nactions will be taken.   \nHowever, pending the outcome of the internal enquiry, six Police Officers have already \nbeen transferred to other divisions so as not to jeopardize the exercise.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. \nYes, hon. Lobine! \nMr Lobine: Thank you. May I ask the hon. Prime Minister with regard to the use of \nSection 46 of the ICTA Act, will Government consider bringing amendments to this particular \nlegislation with a view of it being in conjunction with Section 5 of our Constitution, because \nthere are being abuses of provisional charges and cases lodged under this particular infamous \nsection of the ICTA Act? Will Government consider amending this Act? \n\n25 \n \nThe Prime Minister: As we have said when we presented the Government \nProgramme, for example, the provisional charges will go. It is being worked out by the \nAttorney General at the moment. We will look at all aspects of all that you have just \nmentioned. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Leader of the Opposition! \nMr Lesjongard: Thank you, Madam Speaker. The hon. Prime Minister again is \nconfirming that the Commissioner of Police was not made aware of the arrest of that \njournalist. Did he enquire from the Commissioner of Police why he made the statement: \n“nou’nn fer seki bizin fer?” What does that mean? \nThe Prime Minister: In fact, I did, and he said he was referring to the fact that the \nmobile phones were thrown and they were then taken away with the electronic equipment. It \nis in that sense that he was saying: what had to be done, had to be done. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Beechook! \nMr Beechook: Merci, Madame la présidente. M. le Premier ministre, récemment, il y a \neu un jugement de la cour concernant la protection des sources des journalistes. Est-ce que le \nPremier ministre peut nous assurer que dorénavant s’il y a des cas où les journalistes sont \nconcernés, au moins, qu’il y ait une protection des sources des journalistes et que leurs outils \nde travail ne soient pas saisis ? \nThe Prime Minister: I think that is the case. But when there were allegations, they had \nto check whether it was done or not done. \nMadam Speaker: Alright, yes! \nNext question, hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River, Mr Babajee! \nMAURITIUS METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES – MR R. D., FORMER DIRECTOR \n– CYCLONE BELAL – INDEPENDENT INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/815",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 815,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/815) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the independent \ninquiry carried out on the advice given to the National Crisis Committee on the evolution of \ntropical cyclone Belal by Mr R. D., the then Director of the Mauritius Meteorological \nServices, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether same is now \ncompleted and, if so, indicate the findings thereof and actions taken in relation thereto, \nincluding regarding Mr R.D.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed that following the passage and \ndamage caused by tropical cyclone Belal in  January 2024, the then Ministry of Local \n\n26 \n \nGovernment and the Disaster Risk Management had approached the then Attorney General’s \nOffice for one of its officers, assisted by a Technical Adviser at the Mauritius Meteorological \nServices, to prepare an Independent Report on whether, the then Director of the Mauritius \nMeteorological Services had failed to advise the National Crisis Committee on the proper \ntrajectory of the cyclone. \nThe Report, prepared by an Assistant Solicitor General and a Technical Adviser at the \nMauritius Meteorological Services, was submitted to the then Ministry of Local Government \nand Disaster Risk Management on 20 June 2024. Therein, it was concluded that there had \nbeen clear indications that tropical cyclone Belal was dangerously approaching Mauritius \nover the period of time spanning from 14 January 2024 at 04.00 hours to 15 January 2024 at \n22.00 hours, and that the then Director had failed to advise the National Crisis Committee on \nthe proper trajectory of tropical cyclone Belal. \nMadam Speaker, I must state that the Government is not satisfied with the findings of \nthe “so-called” independent report on the basis of which Dr. R.D. was made to retire in the \ninterest of the public service as per PSC Regulation 39. He subsequently entered a court case \nto contest that decision but was encouraged to withdraw the case and he did so on 06 October \n2025. In fact, it appears that Dr. R.D. would have been made a scapegoat to cover the \nprevious Government’s blunder.  \nAfter a thorough assessment of the report, some very disturbing facts have emerged as \ninformation to the public about impending torrential rains that had been issued, which had \nappeared on the Government Portal on the eve of the dramatic events of 15 January 2024. \nThe communiqué was subsequently deleted for unknown reasons. There are also indications \nthat the former Prime Minister had already planned socio-cultural events to attend in the \nafternoon of 15 January 2024, and that there could very well be a linkage between the \noccurrences that I mentioned. \nMadam Speaker, in the light of the above, further investigation will be conducted to \nestablish the sequence of events and whether there was a deliberate deletion of the flood \nwarnings.  \nAn hon. Member: Criminal!  \nThe Prime Minister: Necessary action will be taken accordingly to ensure that natural \njustice prevails. \nAn hon. Member: Tampering with evidence.  \n\n27 \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, alright?  \nYes, hon. Ramdass! \nCONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW COMMISSION – PROPOSED APPOINTMENT – \nSTATUS \n(No B. /816) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nproposed appointment of a Constitutional Review Commission as announced in the \nGovernment Programme 2025–2029, he will state where matters stand.  \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I will reply to \nParliamentary Questions B/816 and B/836 together as they are connected. \nAs enunciated in the Government Programme 2025-2029, the Government’s foremost \nmission is to revitalise democratic principles, reinforce good governance, and pursue \nconstitutional reforms designed to enhance public confidence in the autonomy of state \ninstitutions.  \nIn this endeavour, my Government is committed to set up a Constitutional Review \nCommission mandated to propose wide-ranging constitutional, electoral and governance \nreforms which will include but will not be limited to – \n(i) \nthe revision of our Electoral System to better reflect the will of the people; \n(ii) \nbolstering fundamental rights by introducing new generation rights relating to the \nenvironment, technology, health, education, and socio-economic issues as well as \nrights of nature, and \n(iii)  the introduction of a comprehensive legislation on political party funding to ensure \ntransparency and fair elections. \nMadam Speaker, constitutional review is a very complex and sensitive matter which \nrequires experts with constitutional acumen and understanding of the specific Mauritian \nparadigm. In this context, the Attorney General is working on the setting up of the \nCommission and will submit proposals shortly. \n\n28 \n \nThis inclusion of the rights of nature in the Constitution will, therefore, be looked into \nby the Constitutional Review Commission in a holistic manner together with constitutional \namendments. \nMadam Speaker: Yes.  \nMr Ramdass: Madam Speaker, may we have an indication as to the composition of the \nCommission, if that has been decided already?  \nThe Prime Minister: As far as I know, the Attorney General is looking into the \ncomposition. We would like to have people who know Constitution but also as far as \npossible, local people. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Ms Thannoo, your question was answered, right? \nIt seems to me. Do you want a supplementary question? No.  \nYes, Mr Lobine.  \nMr Lobine: May I ask the hon. Prime Minister with regard to the timeframe, as to \nwhen this Commission will be set up? \nThe Prime Minister: It will be set up as soon as possible because we want to look at \nall these aspects including electoral reform. We want to proceed with electoral reform earlier \non and not at the end of the mandate. So, this will be starting very soon.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Now, I will call hon. Third Member for Grand’ Baie and \nPoudre d’Or, hon. Etwareea.  \nMAURITIAN ECONOMY – IMF GROWTH PROJECTIONS – GOVERNMENT’S \nECONOMIC OUTLOOK",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/816",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 816,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "To ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance,  \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –  \n \nWhether, in regard to the proposed appointment of a \nConstitutional Review Commission as announced in the \nGovernment Programme 2025–2029, he will state where \nmatters stand?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/817",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 817,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/817) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie &Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nMauritian economy, following the revision by the International Monetary Fund of its growth \nprojections upwards for the April 2025 forecast from 2.8% to 3.0% for 2025 and from 3.0% \nto 3.1% for 2026 in the World Economic Outlook Update July 2025 Report, he will state the \neconomic outlook of Government in terms of growth and inflation for the years 2025 and \n2026, indicating the additional measures Government proposes to take to boost same.  \n\n29",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, as the hon. Member states in his question, in \nJuly 2025, the IMF raised its growth projections for the world economy from 2.8 percent to \n3.0 percent for 2025 and from 3.0 percent to 3.1 percent for 2026. The IMF will release its \nupdated forecasts, I believe, next Tuesday. \nAs for the Mauritian economy, the IMF had, in April 2025, projected a real GDP \ngrowth rate of 3.0 percent for both 2025 and 2026.  Following the Article IV Consultations, \nthe IMF has, in its Staff Report released in June of this year, maintained the growth forecast \nfor Mauritius for 2025 at 3.0 percent but upgraded the forecast for 2026 from 3.0 percent to \n3.4 percent. \nMadam Speaker, according to figures released recently by Statistics Mauritius, the real \nGDP growth rate for Mauritius for 2025 is expected to be slightly higher that is, 3.1 percent.  \nThis growth is being driven mainly by the financial services sector and the tourism sector.  In \nfact, we are expecting some 1,425,000 tourist arrivals this year – the first time that we will \nexceed the pre-pandemic level. \nMadam Speaker, as I have announced in the Budget Speech, we are doing away with \nthe inherited consumption-driven approach and adopting a new economic model that will be \ninvestment-led, productivity-based and export-driven. This implies a fundamental \nrestructuring of our economy that will be achieved over time.   \nWe are expecting a significant improvement in the outlook for the Mauritian economy, \nparticularly for 2026 and beyond.  This is mainly due to the following factors – \n(a) \nfirst, we are further diversifying the economy with the development of four keys, \nwhat we call “Pôles de Croissance”, namely the renewable energy sector, waste-\nto-wealth initiatives, the blue economy, and the creative industries; \n(b) \nsecond, we are in the process of finalising the different incentive schemes \nannounced in the Budget Speech.  These will give a significant boost to \ninvestment in various sectors of the economy; \n(c) \nthird, we are unlocking some Rs30 billions of investments in the renewable \nenergy sector over the next three years; \n(d) \nfourth, we are reviewing the role and functions of the Economic Development \nBoard so that it focusses on boosting productive investments and export \npromotion across all sectors of the economy; \n\n30 \n \n(e) \nfifth, the Ministry of Finance is currently working with different Ministries and \ninstitutions, including the National Productivity and Competitiveness Council, to \ngive a boost to productivity growth across all sectors of the economy, and \n(f) \nsixth, the renewal of the AGOA for one year, following our intense diplomatic \nefforts and negotiations, provide a degree of certainty for our exporters to the US \nmarket. \nMadam Speaker, we are also harnessing the investment and export opportunities from \nour trade agreements such as the African Continental Free Trade Agreement, the \nComprehensive Economic Cooperation and Partnership Agreement with India and the Free \nTrade Agreement with China. \nFurthermore, with the assistance that we just received from India under the Special \nEconomic Package to the tune of USD 680 million which was secured, as I said during my \nrecent visit, we will implement a number of priority projects in strategic sectors such as port \ndevelopment, road infrastructure, healthcare, and energy. \nWith regard to inflation, the Bank of Mauritius is projecting an inflation rate of around \n4 percent in 2025, which remains firmly anchored around the bank’s target range which is 2 \nto 5 percent.  \nLatest information from Statistics Mauritius indicates that inflation will remain below 4 \npercent. Indeed, the CPI Index has decreased by 0.1 and 0.2 points in August and September, \nrespectively.  \nMadam Speaker, we have taken a number of measures to curb inflationary pressures \nand to protect the purchasing power of the population. These include – \n(i) \nraising the policy rate by 50 basis points to 4.5 percent per annum in February of \nthis year; \n(ii) \nby increasing the supply of forex in the domestic foreign exchange market to \nprevent a rapid depreciation of the rupee; \n(iii) removal of VAT on a number of basic necessities as announced in the Budget \nSpeech, and \n(iv) the establishment of a Price Stabilisation Fund of Rs10 billion, out of which, we \nare already providing subsidies on five essential commodities. We are working on \na second set of essential commodities. \n\n31 \n \nMadam Speaker, as a responsible Government, we are closely monitoring \ndevelopments both domestically and on the international front. We will take appropriate \nmeasures in order to achieve our objective of a real GDP growth path of 4 to 5 percent by the \nend of our mandate while keeping inflation within the target range set by the Bank of \nMauritius. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nThe Prime Minister: Next question. \nMadam Speaker: Next question, yes. \nMr Lesjongard: No, I have a supplementary. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, supplementary. \nMr Lesjongard: May I ask the hon. Prime Minister whether he will agree that the \ninflation rate of 4 percent as predicted will be exceeded because of the recent increases in the \nprices of commodities and also because of the VAT that is being imposed on SMEs?  We have \nseen recently – the prices of dholl puri. If I may use that sentence again, dholl puri monte ho \ngal ba, Madam Speaker! \nAn hon. Member: Met kestion do! \nThe Prime Minister: In fact, as I said, the Leader of Opposition has a short memory. \nDo you remember what the rate of inflation was when you were in government? We are \nclearing the mess that you left! At one point, it was nearly 10 percent! Now, we are bringing \nit down. \nAnd if you had listened, we are saying 4 percent, but the indication might be lesser. It \nwill be slightly lesser than 4 percent. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix! \nEASTERN HIGH SECURITY PRISON, MELROSE – 17 JULY 2025 \nINCIDENTS – NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION REPORT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/818",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 818,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/818) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the incidents \nwhich occurred at the Eastern High Security Prison, in Melrose, on 17 July 2025, he will state \n\n32 \n \nwhether the National Human Rights Commission has submitted to his office a report in \nrelation thereto and, if so, indicate – \n(a) whether consideration will be given for the tabling thereof, and \n(b) the actions, if any, he proposes to take in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the National Human Rights Commission has \nalready, as I am sure the hon. Member knows, submitted its report on the incidents which \noccurred at the Eastern High Security Prison at Melrose on 17 July 2025. \nAs regard to part (a) of the question, I have to inform the House that Government has \ntaken cognizance of the contents of the report, which has been made public for the first time. \nIf you remember, in the previous government, all reports were being hidden in drawers. In \nline with our policy of transparency and accountability, I will table a copy of the report. \nMadam Speaker, I am concerned by the disturbing facts that came out of the report.  As \nI have just stated in the House, I consider that respect for Human Rights and the application \nof sections 5(1) and 5(2) of the Constitution are the bedrock of any civilised society. My \nGovernment will always uphold the sanctity of human rights and dignity of all our citizens. \nAny trespass will not be tolerated by the Government. \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, the Commissioner of Police and the Commissioner \nof Prisons have been requested to take immediate actions, not only for the implementation of \nthe measures recommended, but also the necessary disciplinary actions against the officers \nconcerned, after consultation with the Office of Director of Public Prosecutions. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: May I ask the hon. Prime Minister whether he would request the \nCommissioner of Police and the Commissioner of Prisons to consider the use of full body \ncam by all prison officers who work at such a high security prison so that the truthful events \nalways come to light? \nThe Prime Minister: It is a very good suggestion, and I will certainly. We are, in fact, \nlooking at this. But this would probably happen at some stage. I must also tell you that I had \nsaid at a time, ‘Do not come tell me some cameras were not working. If that happens, \neverybody will be sacked!’ Fortunately, all cameras were working. \nMadam Speaker: Alright. \nMr Lesjongard: Madam Speaker! \n\n33 \n \nMadam Speaker: Yes, go ahead! \nMr Lesjongard: Madam Speaker, I… \nMadam Speaker: Question, please! \nMr Lesjongard: Yes. I appreciate that the report has been made public, Madam \nSpeaker, because that was a very… \n(Interruptions) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Ale, koze papa! \nMadam Speaker: Let him speak, please! \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Tirwar? Enba latab! \nMr Lesjongard: I am being interrupted, Madam Speaker, when I am putting my \nquestion. We have to put questions! \nMadam Speaker: Carry on! Carry on! \nMr Lesjongard: I said that I appreciate that the report has been made public. But, \nMadam Speaker, when I compare the reply to the PNQ that I put to the hon. Prime Minister \non 22 July on the same issue with the report that has been made public, I note a certain \nnumber of discrepancies between the two. I mean the report and the answers that the hon. \nPrime Minister gave to the House. \nMadam Speaker: Put your question! \nMr Lesjongard: Maybe he must have been provided with false information on that \nday. \nMr Mohamed: What discrepancy? Say! \nMr Lesjongard: My question is direct. \nMr Mohamed: Which discrepancies? You cannot just say there are discrepancies and \nyou do not say what. \nMr Lesjongard: May I ask the hon. Prime Minister whether he will sack the \nCommissioner of Prisons? \nMr Mohamed: What discrepancy? \n\n34 \n \nMadam Speaker: This is his question. \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, what can I say? He does not say what discrepancy! But he \nmust realise when the… \nMr Lesjongard: It is what the population is asking! \nThe Prime Minister: …realise, unlike you! When you ask a question, I answer the \nquestion. I could have said, ‘There is going to be an inquiry.’ But I gave you whatever I had. \nAfter the inquiry, as I said, very disturbing facts came to light. After the inquiry! How can I \nknow before? \nMr Lesjongard: Know what? \nThe Prime Minister: But how do you expect me to know before the inquiry? \nMr Lesjongard: On the basis of the report that you have provided. \nThe Prime Minister: Of the report, yes! That is what I have just said. That is why we \nare publishing; we have published it; we are laying it on the Table of the Assembly. We are \nnot hiding, unlike you! When you were in government, hiding all of these reports! We did not \ndo that. \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Rapor lor dializ! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, I am glad the hon. Prime Minister did publish the \nreport. That is commendable. However, the Commissioner of Prisons, soon after the incident, \nhad reacted saying that he is proud of his officers and he is proud of the way they acted, and \nthat he will would take full responsibility. Is the hon. Prime Minister satisfied of the stand \ntaken by the Commissioner of Prisons soon after those incidents, and has he had any \ndiscussion with the Commissioner of Prisons with regard to that? \nThe Prime Minister: As I said, Madam Speaker, now, with the report out, I have asked \nthem to have to have a full investigation. Also, they must contact the DPP. It is not for me to \nsay that. It is for the DPP to decide what action has to be taken. \nMadam Speaker: Next question, hon. Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and \nSouillac!  \n \n\n35 \n \nROAD RAGE INCIDENTS & VIOLENT/AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOUR – \nSAFEGUARD MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/819",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 819,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/819) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to rage \nincidents and violent and aggressive behaviour on the roads, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of reported cases thereof over the past three years, indicating the \npercentage thereof pointing to drivers, respectively as – \n(i) \nvictims, and \n(ii) \nperpetrators, and \n(b) \nmeasures being taken to protect road users and the general public and combat \ndangerous and anti-social behaviour on the roads.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed by the Commissioner of Police that since January 2022 up to 02 October 2025, a \ntotal of 237 cases related to rage incidents and violent or aggressive behaviour on the roads \nhave been reported to the Police, involving 394 drivers. Out of these, 200 drivers were \nclassified as victims, representing 51%, while 194 drivers were classified as perpetrators, \nrepresenting 49%. \nI am further informed that in a number of cases, multiple drivers were involved in the \nsame incident, with one or more drivers recorded as victims and one or more as perpetrators, \nwhich explains, in fact, the discrepancy between the total number of reported cases and the \nnumber of drivers concerned. \nAs regard to part (b), I wish to inform the House that Government, in collaboration with \nthe Police, has strengthened measures to protect road users and combat such dangerous \nbehaviour. These include – \n1. \nThe re-introduction of the new Penalty Points System in January 2026, with \nsevere sanctions against reckless and anti-social practices as well as illegal races; \n2. \nEnhanced patrol presence, Police Officers including riders are now daily \ndeployed at strategic locations to regulate traffic near schools, bus terminals, light \nrail stations and commercial centres; \n\n36 \n \n3. \nAwareness campaigns in schools, shopping malls, public transport and also at the \nlight rail stations are being carried out; \n4. \nOptimal use of the Safe City surveillance system for swift intervention is being \ndone, and finally \n5. \nTargeted crackdown operations near night clubs and entertainment venues, with \nparticular focus on drink-and-drive offences. \nMadam Speaker, let me assure the House that Government remains fully committed to \nensuring the safety of all road users and maintaining order on our roads. \nMadam Speaker: Yes!  \nMr A. Duval: May I ask the Prime Minister: with regard to the use of unlawful \nweapons, illicit, des armes, couteaux, etc., does the Prime Minister propose to urgently \nensure that there are stops and searches, roadblocks being effected like it used to be, by the \nSMF, the SSU regularly, especially in areas that are well known to be hotspots. \nThe Prime Minister: I understand that this is being done but we do not want to give it \ntoo much publicity. You know, this is a country that attracts tourists; we do not want to give \nthe impression that it is a Police State, but it is being done. \nMadam Speaker: Mr Jhummun, please! \nFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS LOANS – FEES, CHARGES & COLLATERAL \nSECURITIES – REGULATION MECHANISM",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/820",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 820,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/820) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the fees, charges and collateral securities regarding loans granted by financial \ninstitutions, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Bank of Mauritius, \ninformation as to the regulation mechanism in place in relation thereto, indicating if \nconsideration will be given for the imposition of limitations on the quantum thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Bank of Mauritius that, in \nrespect of loans provided by financial institutions, the fees, charges and security requirements \nare determined by these institutions themselves in line with their internal policies and risk \nassessment. \n\n37 \n \nHowever, by virtue of Section 6 of the Bank of Mauritius Act 2004, the Bank of \nMauritius has the power to regulate the fees and charges in respect of the services provided \nby these financial institutions and impose such limitation on the quantum of those fees and \ncharges as it may deem appropriate. \n In this context, the Bank of Mauritius constantly monitors the fees and charges that \nthese financial institutions are imposing.   \nIn fact, in accordance with Section 57 of the Banking Act 2004, these financial services \nshould at all times display in a conspicuous place in the public part of their principal place of \nbusiness and in each of their branches or offices, the rates of the fees or charges being \nimposed. \nIn addition, with a view to enhancing transparency and enabling the public to make an \ninformed choice, financial institutions are required to upload information on their fees and \ncharges on both their websites and on the website of the Bank of Mauritius. \nFurthermore, these financial institutions are required to inform the Bank of Mauritius \nwhenever they change their fees and charges.  \nMadam Speaker, the Bank of Mauritius thus examines any change in the fees and \ncharges, and may query them on the reasons for such increases and, if need be, to intervene to \nsafeguard the interest of customers and the public in general. But as I said in the beginning, \nthese are determined by the financial institutions themselves and it depends on their internal \npolicies and the risk assessment. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Time is up for the moment. I have been advised that the \nfollowing PQs have been withdrawn – B/821, B/824, B/825, B/828, B/829, B/830, and \nB/835. \nNow we go to questions addressed to hon. Ministers. The hon. First Member for \nRodrigues, hon. Ms Collet! \n \nCOMPULSORY DOGS’ REGISTRATION – PROCEDURES & FEES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/821",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 821,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/821) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mr K. P., \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the Ministries, Government \nBodies and Parastatal Bodies in which he held remunerated positions since 2015 to 2024, \nindicating in each case, the – \n(a)  capacity thereof;  \n(b)  terms and conditions of contract, including remuneration, allowances and benefits \ndrawn, and  \n(c)  overseas missions undertaken, indicating costs incurred, countries visited, \nduration and names of accompanying persons, if any.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n\n137 \n \nDRUG TRAFFICKING – SOUTH WEST & WEST COASTS – SEA PASSAGES \nSECURITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/822",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 822,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/822) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to drug \ntrafficking, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether the sea \npassages along the southwest and western coasts are guarded against activities connected \ntherewith – \n(a) \nindicating whether the authorities are equipped with new equipment therefor, and  \n(b) \ngiving details of recent successful operations carried out thereat.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that there are 17 sea passages \nwhich are located along the South West and West Coasts. \nThese sea passages are policed by the National Coast Guard through seaward and \nsurveillance patrols, at three different layers – \n(i) \nthe First Layer of Surveillance - Coastline to Reefs through foot/bike/mobile and \nafloat patrols;  \n(ii) \nthe Second Layer of Surveillance - Reefs to Territorial Limits through inshore \npatrol boats/vessels, enhanced with joint helicopter surveillance, and \n(iii) the Third Layer of Surveillance - Beyond Territorial Limits through patrols by \nships, aircraft, the Maritime Intelligence Cell, the National Coast Guard \nOperations Room, the National Maritime Information Sharing Centre and the \nCoastal Surveillance and Radar System. \n With regard to part (a) of the question, the existing Coastal Surveillance and Radar \nSystem will be replaced by a new and sophisticated system from Japan which will provide \nbetter images of boats and vessels manoeuvring in our territorial waters and is expected to be \nfully operational by December 2026. \nIn addition, a new multipurpose offshore patrol vessel is being acquired under an Indian \nline of credit and seven speed boats will be purchased during Financial Year 2025-2026 with \na view to enhancing the operational capabilities of the National Coast Guard to patrol our \nwaters. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat 22 drug cases, for a street value of around Rs1.35 billion, have been detected by the \n\n138 \n \nMauritius Police Force along the South West and West coasts from 2020 to 02 October 2025, \nand 65 suspects have been arrested. \nI wish to inform the House that two Regional Centres have been set up: one in \nMadagascar (Regional Maritime Information Fusion Centre) and one in Seychelles (Regional \nCentre for Operational Coordination) under the Maritime Security Programme of the Indian \nOcean Commission. The Maritime Security programme has been replaced by the Safe Seas \nAfrica since June 2024.  Two senior Police officers from the National Coast Guard have been \ndesignated to act as International Liaison Officers and to share intelligence with the National \nCoast Guard Maritime Intelligence Cell on the movements of suspicious vessels/illegal \nactivities in the Indian Ocean region. \n \nELECTORAL SYSTEM – DECLARATION OF COMMUNITY – PROPOSED \nAMENDMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/823",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 823,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/823) Dr. Ms B Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nmandatory constitutional provision for every candidate for election at any general election of \nmembers of the Assembly to declare the community to which the latter belongs, he will state \nif consideration will be given for the introduction in the Assembly of a proposed amendment \naiming at doing away therewith, pending the introduction of a major electoral reform as \ncontained in the Electoral Agreement of the Labour Party-Mouvement Militant Mauricien-\nNouveaux Democrates-Rezistans ek Alternativ and the Government Programme 2025-2029 \nand, if so, when.",
      "answer": "Reply: The people of this country have entrusted Government with the unequivocal \nmandate to modernise the electoral system to make it more democratic, representative and \nreflective of the exigencies of a modern society. As stated in the Government Programme \n2025-2029, Government is committed to undertake a review of the Constitution, including \nthe electoral system. The Constitution of the Republic of Mauritius, along with its electoral \nsystem, has undoubtedly been a bedrock of political and social stability in our country. \nHowever, it is clear that it is no longer responsive to the profound changes which our country \nhas witnessed since Independence.  \nThe question of declaration of community will figure prominently among the terms of \nreference of the Constitutional Review Commission that will be set up shortly by \nGovernment. \n\n139 \n \nCOMMISSION OF THE PREROGATIVE OF MERCY – COMMISSION \nCOMPOSITION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/824",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 824,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/824) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Commission of the Prerogative of Mercy, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain information as to the present composition thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nSPECIAL STRIKING TEAM – DRUG PLANTING ALLEGATIONS – REPORTED & \nPROSECUTED CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/825",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 825,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/825) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nallegations of drug planting by officers of the defunct Special Striking Team prior to \nDecember 2024, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of \nPolice, information as to – \n(a)  the number of reported cases thereof, indicating the number thereof being \nprosecuted and the charges preferred against the suspects, and  \n(b)  whether the Scotland Yard or any other similarly constituted foreign investigating \nbody has or will be requested to assist in investigations thereinto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nBETAMAX LTD & STATE TRADING CORPORATION – CONTRACT \nTERMINATION – COMPENSATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/826",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 826,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/826) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the total \nsum claimed by Betamax Ltd., for the termination in 2015 of the Contract of Affreightment \nsigned in 2009 with the State Trading Corporation for the transportation of petroleum \nproducts from Mangalore, India to Mauritius, he will state the sources from which payment \nof compensation has been made. \n\n140",
      "answer": "Reply: I wish to thank the hon. Member for putting this question. It gives me an \nopportunity to expose yet another colossal blunder committed by the previous government for \npolitical vendetta and its implications on public finances.  \nThe House will recall that there were two main arrangements that were negotiated to \nguarantee the supply of petroleum products to Mauritius, namely – \n(i) \nduring an official mission to India, I had asked the then Honourable Prime \nMinister, Dr Manmohan Singh if we could have a Government-to-Government \narrangement with the Government of India, for the supply of petroleum products \nfrom Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Ltd, India. The then Prime Minister \nof India agreed and ensured that it could become a reality, and  \n(ii) \nthrough a contract between STC and Betamax Ltd, after tender exercise, we \nensured efficient and reliable transportation of petroleum products. \nThese arrangements would have benefitted Mauritius in terms of stability, certainty, \nand efficiency in the supply of petroleum products. All the expected benefits were \nundermined by the previous government decision to terminate these arrangements with both \nMangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Ltd and Betamax Ltd, with no due regard to our long \nestablished and privileged relationship with India. \nThe termination of the Contract of Affreightment by the STC with Betamax Ltd has led \nto claims by Betamax Ltd for a total sum of USD 115,267,199 (Rs4.8 billion). Following the \ndecision by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on 14 June 2021, the STC was \nordered to pay an amount of Rs5,552,813,110 to Betamax Ltd made up as follows – \n(i) \nDamages  \n \n \n \n \nRs 4.77 billion  \n(ii) \nLegal and Arbitration costs \n \n \nRs 176 million  \n(iii) \nInterest  \n \n \n \n \nRs 599 million \nThis amount was paid to Betamax Ltd on 22 June 2021 and was financed as follows – \n• Rs4.6 billion paid from the Consolidated Fund, and  \n• Rs952,813,110 by the STC. \nNot surprising that the STC went bankrupt and is now heavily indebted. \nI would like to highlight that such a huge amount had to be met from taxpayers’ money \nand the then government had to pass a Supplementary Appropriation Act on 30 June 2021 to \nthat effect. The decision of terminating the contract was taken without giving due \nconsideration to its legal and financial implications. This again illustrates the irresponsibility \nof the previous regime and the cost to the economy due to political vendetta. \n \n\n141 \n \nAIR MAURITIUS LTD – RODRIGUES FLIGHT (MK 120) – INJURED PASSENGER \nCASE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/827",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 827,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/827) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the flight MK 120 of \n27 September 2025 to Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from Air \nMauritius Ltd., information as to the circumstances of the incident which caused a senior \ncitizen to be injured during boarding, indicating if the staff present at the time was equipped \nto deal with the situation and give the necessary medical assistance to the injured passenger.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Acting Director of Civil Aviation and Air Mauritius Ltd \nthat on 27 September 2025, prior to boarding the flight MK 120 for Rodrigues, passenger of \n82 years old, sustained a minor injury while entering the airport apron bus, commonly known \nas “cobus”. \nAt the time of boarding the aircraft and prior to take off, the passenger did not report \nany injury to the staff of Air Mauritius Ltd and Airports of Mauritius Co. Ltd. It was only \nduring the flight to Rodrigues that the passenger informed the Cabin Crew of the incident as \nher foot was bleeding.  \nUpon being informed, the Cabin Crew provided immediate first aid assistance to the \npassenger by cleaning the injury with ‘betadine’ and covering it with an adhesive bandage.  \nThe passenger was also provided with a painkiller. \nI am also informed that the flight Captain informed the Air Traffic Control and \nrequested medical assistance on arrival in Rodrigues. Accordingly, upon landing in \nRodrigues, the passenger was examined by the Nursing Officer on duty and left the airport \nafter undergoing border control formalities. \nAs regards the provision of medical assistance to injured passengers, I am informed that \nall Cabin Crew of Air Mauritius Ltd are trained and equipped to manage such situation and in \nproviding appropriate assistance to passengers.  \nI wish to also inform the House that as at date, no formal complaint has been received \nby Air Mauritius Ltd regarding the said incident. \nMR S.K. DEATH – INQUIRY UPDATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/828",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 828,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/828) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \n\n142 \n \ninquiry initiated into the death of S. K. in or about October 2020, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nFORMER PRIME MINISTER’S ADVISORS – NAMES & PAY PACKAGES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/829",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 829,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/829) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nAdvisers whose services were retained by the former Prime Minister, he will state the names \nand pay packages thereof, including the boards on which they equally served over the period \n2015 to November 2024.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nNATIONAL AGENCY FOR DRUG CONTROL – ANNUAL BUDGET – CEO & \nCHAIRPERSON’S BENEFITS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/830",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 830,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/830) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nNational Agency for Drug Control, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information \nas to the – \n(a)  details of the annual budget allocated thereto;  \n(b)  monthly salaries and benefits drawn by the Chief Executive Officer and \nChairperson thereof, and  \n(c)  amount disbursed in terms of other salaries, consultancy fees and administrative \noverheads as at date.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nTRIOLET POLICE STATION – JURISDICTION – POLICE ASSISTANCE \nREQUESTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/831",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 831,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/831) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nTriolet Police Station, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of \nPolice, information as to the – \n\n143 \n \n(a) \nnumber of police officers attached thereto at any given point in time; \n(b) \nestimated number of inhabitants falling under the jurisdiction thereof, and \n(c) \nnumber of reported instances wherein requests for police assistance remained \nunattended due to understaffing or unavailability of police vehicles since January \n2025 to date, indicating the reporting mechanisms put in place to ensure the \nescalation of such incidences to higher authorities for prompt remedial action.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that the Triolet Police Station falls \nunder the command and control of an Assistant Commissioner of Police and is known as \nDivisional Commander Northern Division. The Station area covers an approximate area of 18 \nsquare kilometres and includes the regions of Solitude, Triolet and part of Pointe aux \nPiments. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that \nat any given point in time, there is an average of 8 Police Officers attached to the Police \nStation as they operate on a shift system basis. Moreover, in all there are 70 Police Officers of \ndifferent ranks assigned to the Triolet Police Station, which is considered adequate according \nto classification of Police Stations. \nThe Triolet Police Station is also supported by Police Officers from other Units and \nBranches of the Police Force, such as the Emergency Response Service, Divisional Support \nUnit, the Divisional Criminal Investigation Division, the Anti-Drug and Smuggling Unit and \nTraffic Police. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am further informed by the Commissioner of \nPolice that the Triolet Police Station covers a population of approximately 27,000 inhabitants. \nWith regard to part (c) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat since January 2025 to date, there are no reported instances wherein requests for police \nassistance remained unattended by the Triolet Police Station due to understaffing or \nunavailability of police vehicles. \nRequests for police assistance in all Police Stations around the island are attended \nunder an established reporting mechanism which escalates any request through the station \nhierarchy and to higher authorities for appropriate action. \nIt is also a long-standing practice that whenever a particular Police Station is \nunderstaffed or its vehicle is unavailable at the time of a request, assistance from supporting \n\n144 \n \nunits such as the Emergency Response Service and the Divisional Support Unit are requested \nas well as reinforcement from the nearby Police Stations. \nLet me add that a new Police Station will be constructed at the same premises of the \npresent one. It will provide better logistics and facilities to serve the public. \nMAURITIUS INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD – CONSTRUCTION \nINDUSTRY – BENEFICIARIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/832",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 832,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/832) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port-Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Mauritius Investment Corporation Ltd., he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain therefrom, information as to the names of the companies of the construction industry \nthat benefitted therefrom, indicating – \n(a) \nthe sums disbursed thereto in each case; \n(b) \nwhether the National Social Living Development Ltd, awarded thereto contracts \nfor the construction of social housing units, and \n(c) \nwhether any of these companies is currently encountering difficulties to honour \nits obligations thereto.",
      "answer": "Reply: With regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Bank of Mauritius \nthat three companies in the construction industry have benefited from investment by the \nMauritius Investment Corporation Ltd (MIC).  \nThese companies and the respective sums disbursed are as follows – \n(a) \nKuros Construction Solutions Ltd, who is closely related to the former \nMinister of Finance, Dr. Padayachy – Rs225 million;  \n(b) \nBest Construct Co. Ltd. – Rs150 million, and  \n(c) \nRamasawmy & Ramasawmy Co. Ltd. – Rs40 million. \nConcerning part (b) of the question, according to the information submitted by the New \nSocial Living Development Ltd, out of these three companies, Kuros Construction Solutions \nLtd and Ramasawmy & Ramasawmy Co. Ltd. have been awarded contracts for the \nconstruction of social housing units, amounting to Rs2.4 billion and Rs548 million, \nrespectively. \n\n145 \n \nWith regard to part (c) of the question, I am informed by the Bank of Mauritius that \nRamasawmy & Ramasawmy Co Ltd is currently meeting its debt servicing obligations vis-à-\nvis the MIC.  \nHowever, Kuros Construction Solutions Ltd and Best Construct Co. Ltd. are in default \nfor their debt servicing obligations. I am also informed that Best Construct Co. Ltd. is in \nliquidation since June 2025. \nAccording to the New Social Living Development Ltd (NSLD), Kuros Construction \nSolutions Ltd has accumulated significant delays in the construction of the social housing \nunits. The NSLD has served a notice on the contractor for termination of the contracts \nallocated to Kuros Construction Solutions Ltd. The latter has informed that the proportion of \nthe contracts will be executed by another contractor for the same contract value. \nThis is a clear example of gross mismanagement and abuse of public funds where huge \namounts were disbursed to the cronies of the previous regime. \nRODRIGUES – WATER PROJECTS – FUNDS BUDGETED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/833",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 833,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/833) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the water projects in \nRodrigues, he will – \n(a) \nstate the amount budgeted therefor during this financial year, and \n(b) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Investment Corporation \nLtd., information as to the sum disbursed as at to date from the Rs 1 billion \nearmarked therefor.",
      "answer": "Reply: With regard to part (a) of the question, an amount of Rs436.5 million has been \nearmarked for water projects in Rodrigues as follows – \n(a) \nRs38.9 million in the budget of Rodrigues Regional Assembly (RRA) for the \nrehabilitation of dams and rainwater harvesting; \n(b) \nRs40.9 million in the budget of the Prime Minister’s Office for the construction \nof a desalination plant at Caverne Bouteille which would be used to supply water \nduring the construction phase of the new Runway Project at Plaine Corail; \n(c) \nRs16.7 million as grant from the Agence Française de Développement (AFD) for \ntechnical assistance, and \n(d) \nRs340 million for two desalination plants at Pointe Coton (4,350 m3 daily), \nCaverne Bouteille (610 m3 daily) and other related water infrastructure projects \nwhich is being financed by the MIC.  \n\n146 \n \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Bank of Mauritius that out \nof the Rs1 billion earmarked by the MIC, since Financial Year 2021/2022, an amount of \nRs180 million has been disbursed to Rodrigues Public Utilities Corporation as follows – \n(a) \nRs60 million on 28 February 2024; \n(b) \nRs60 million on 12 July 2024, and \n(c) \nRs60 million on 25 August 2025. \n \nMR P. G. DEATH – MUMBAI – CIRCUMSTANCES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/834",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 834,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/834) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mr P. G. \nwho passed away in Mumbai on 30 September 2025, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain through the relevant authorities, information as to the circumstances surrounding the \ndeath thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGENERAL ELECTIONS – LAW AMENDMENTS – MAURITIAN DIASPORA – \nRIGHT TO VOTE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/835",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 835,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/835) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nNational Assembly Elections, he will state if Government proposes to amend the legislation \naiming at allowing Mauritian nationals living abroad the right to vote therefor and, if so, give \ndetails thereof and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \nCONSTITUTION – RIGHTS OF NATURE – PROPOSED AMENDMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/836",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 836,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/836) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nintroduction in the Assembly of a proposed amendment to include the rights of nature in the \nConstitution, as contained in the Electoral Agreement of the Labour Party-Mouvement \nMilitant Mauricien-Nouveaux Democrates-Rezistans ek Alternativ and the Government \nProgramme 2025-2029, he will state where matters stand. \n\n147",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/816) \n \nCASINO DE MAURICE – PROFIT/LOSS RECORD (2015–2024) – STRATEGIC \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/837",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 837,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/837) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Casino de Maurice, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the State \nInvestment Corporation Ltd., information as to the yearly profit/loss thereof over the period \n2015 to 2024, indicating the measures being proposed to address the current state of affairs.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the State Investment Corporation (SIC) that the Casinos of \nMauritius have incurred cumulative losses of around Rs1.5 billion over the period 2015 to \n2024. The yearly losses have been increasing significantly over the years as follows – \n• \nFor year ended December 2015 – 59 million rupees. \n• \nFor year ended December 2016 – 75 million rupees. \n• \nFor year ended December 2017 – 133 million rupees. \n• \nFor year ended December 2018 – 95 million rupees.  \n• \nFor year ended December 2019 – 117 million rupees.  \n• \nFor year ended December 2020 – 173 million rupees. \n• \nFor year ended December 2021 – 267 million rupees.  \n• \nFor year ended December 2022 – 211 million rupees. \n• \nFor 18 months ended 30 June 2024 – 327 million rupees. \n The figures speak for themselves. The casinos, under SIC’s management, have been \nmaking heavy losses year after year. It is rare to see an enterprise in the gaming sector facing \nsuch a disastrous financial situation. Yet, despite these successive losses over several years, \nthe previous government allowed the situation to persist without intervention.  \n The operation and management of casinos should not remain within the public sector. \nThis situation is unsustainable and has deteriorated over the last 10 years.  \n \nI am informed that the SIC is working on a plan to address the current state of affairs \nof the present casinos, including – \n\n148 \n \n(i) \nreorganisation of the casinos;  \n(ii) \ndeveloping an early retirement plan for existing employees, and \n(iii) relaunching tenders for a possible disposal of the casinos on a fast-track basis. \n \nAMAURY –  BUS SERVICE – COMMUTERS’ COMPLAINTS & REMEDIAL \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/838",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 838,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/838) Ms R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of Agro-\nIndustry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to the compulsory \nregistration of dogs, effective as from 01 October 2025, he will, for the benefit of the House – \n(a) \ntable a list of the centres designated therefor;  \n(b) \ngive details regarding the –  \n(i) \nprocedures and fees applicable; \n\n38 \n \n(ii) \nimplementation and monitoring thereof by his Ministry, the Mauritius \nSociety for Animal Welfare and the Rodrigues Regional Assembly; \n(iii) budget allocated therefor, and \n (c) state whether consideration will be given for the extension of this exercise to other \ndomestic animals.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, I will seek your indulgence because the reply is quite \nlengthy and it will be three in one. \nMadam Speaker: You do not want to circulate? \nDr. Boolell: Sorry? \nMadam Speaker: You do not want to do partly and then circulate? \nDr. Boolell: No, in the light of concern expressed, in the light of what people want to \nhear. Let me reply to the question. \nMadam Speaker: Alright. \nDr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I will reply to Parliamentary \nQuestion B/838, B/845 and B/857 concurrently as they relate to the same subject. \nMadam Speaker: The last one was B/857! \nDr. Boolell: Thank you. As a responsible Government and a dog loving country, it is \nour duty to ensure that animal welfare laws are strengthened to advocate, inter alia, for \nresponsible dog ownership and the well-being of the population in view of the risk associated \nwith stray dogs. \nThe issue of stray dogs is accurate and chronic and remains one of the top priorities of \nour Ministry. I am informed by the Mauritius Society for Animal Welfare that the total \nowned dog population in Mauritius is estimated at around 246,000 including both dogs that \nare kept restricted to the owner’s properties and those roaming freely. \nAccording to MSAW, nearly 20% of these owned dogs roam outside contributing to a \nstreet population estimated at approximately 57,000. But, in my assessment, the number is far \nhigher. A key challenge for street dog welfare is the lack of responsible and informed pet \nownership. \nOn 01 October 2025, Madam Speaker, Section 31(1) and (3) of the Animal Welfare Act \nhave been proclaimed and provide for micro-chipping and registration of dogs only and make \nit compulsory for the owners to register their dogs. This regulatory framework will enable \nMSAW to promote sustainable control of dog population enhance responsible pet ownership, \nreduced animal cruelty and minimise health hazard associated with stray dogs. \n\n39 \n \nThe registration process is conducted by MSAW where the owner of the dog is required \nto fill in an application form for registration. The dogs are being microchip on site and the \ndog owners will have to produce relevant documents namely the National ID card and proof \nof address at time of registration. \nSubsequently, the MSAW will issue a registration certificate to the owner. The MSAW \nwill also enter into an MoU with private veterinary practices for micro-chipping and \nregistration. \nMadam Speaker, in line with the principle of good governance, Government in \nensuring a system which is transparent, safe and which will be closely monitored for the \nmicro-chipping and registration of dogs. \nIn that context, MSAW will launch an expression of interest to enlist services of private \nvet consultation. The collaboration of NGOs will also be enlisted for micro-chipping and \nregistration during the sterilization campaign and, in the same spirit, MSAW will ensure that \nthe NGOs – \n(a) \nare registered as proper entity dealing with welfare of animal; \n(b) \nare registered with the Data Protection Office since they will be dealing personal \ninformation of dog owners; \n(c) \nundertake to provide all information with regard to the pet owner and the dog to \nthe, MSAW; \n(d) \nenlist the services of a veterinarian, registered with the Vet Council of Mauritius, \nwho is mandated under the Dangerous Drugs Act to administer regulated drugs \nsuch as Xylazine and Ketamine which is the second and third schedules, \nrespectively, of course, these are being used in sterilization. \nMadam Speaker, with a view to monitoring the registration of dogs, MSAW will keep a \ndatabase in accordance with the provisions of the Data Protection Act. The onus to inform \nMSAW of any death or transferred ownership of a dog lies with the owner which can be done \nby telephone or email.  \nTo widen coverage, micro-chipping and registration are being extended to Municipal \nCouncils, Community Centres and Village Hall up to June 2026. Moreover, the \nCommissioner of Police has agreed for registration and micro-chipping to be undertaken \nwithin the compound of police stations island-wide. A calendar for the exercise has been \ntentatively worked out from 13 October to 23 December 2025. I will table the list of all \ndedicated centres and stations. \n\n40 \n \nAt this stage, no amendment is being envisaged to the Animal Welfare Act as the \ndecentralisation process island-wide is happening de facto. MSAW has currently two stations \ndedicated for the microchipping and registration of dogs located in Rose Hill and Plaine \nMagnien respectively. As at 06 October 2025, a total of 853 dogs has been registered and \nmicrochipped. Since October 2025, the MSAW has set the fees for the registration of dogs at \nthe rate of Rs350, that is, a reduction from the actual fees of Rs500 which include registration \nand veterinary fees as well as microchipping. \nMadam Speaker, as a caring Government and our concern for animal lovers, the \nMSAW is promoting mass sterilisation campaigns whereby dogs are being microchipped, \nregistered and sterilised free of charge given a number of hardship cases that have been \nobserved and a flexible approach is being adopted. The MSAW has scheduled meetings with \nregistered NGOs to encourage grassroot participation through interactive sessions and \ndialogue for transparency and accountability. Transportation is made available on a case-to-\ncase basis.  \nWith regard to budget allocation, I am informed that an amount of Rs20 million has \nbeen provided for the MSAW in the Financial Year 2025-2026 for the implementation of the \nsterilisation campaign, including microchipping and registration. Hon. Members will \nappreciate that the extension of the exercise to other domestic animals cannot be \ncontemplated.  \nConcerning the implementation and monitoring for Rodrigues, I am informed by the \nMSAW that an MoU was signed with Rodrigues Regional Assembly, represented by the \nCommission for Agriculture in 2022 for the implementation of the National Sustainable \nProject for Dog Population Control in Rodrigues. During the last mission of MSAW to \nRodrigues in November 2023 regarding the mass sterilisation campaign over the island, \nofficers of the Veterinary Services of Rodrigues were trained on dog registration procedures. \nThe list of designated centres to undertake microchipping and registration in Rodrigues will \nbe determined in coordination with the Commission for Agriculture and the Division of \nVeterinary Services. In this context, a mission will be undertaken to Rodrigues to ensure \nsmooth implementation of dog registration across the island. \nFor effective monitoring, Madam Speaker, MSAW will collaborate with Commission \nfor Agriculture to collect relevant information and visits will be conducted by enforcement \nofficers of MSAW to ensure proper implementation and compliance with the legal \n\n41 \n \nframework. The list of officers from MSAW Enforcement Department assigned to ensure \ncompliance is – \n• \nMr Simanassamiane; \n• \nMr Pandoo, \n• \nMrs Kalloo-Lebon, and  \n• \nthe team is led by Mr Govindasami, Director of MSAW. \nMadam Speaker, our interest is to safeguard the welfare of all animals. In that context, \nmy Ministry and MSAW are working in close collaboration with all like-minded \nstakeholders, registered NGOs, vets and pet owners. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister.  \nHon. Ms Collet, do you have a question? Hon. Dr. Prayag? Yes? That was three in one. \nDr. Prayag: Thank you for your reply. \nMadam Speaker: We have three in one. So, it is a good thing you are asking. \nDr. Prayag: Exactly. Can the House be made aware about when the MoU will be \nsigned with the private veterinary doctors and secondly, is the Ministry considering to permit \nnew private vehicles for transportation of animals, dogs in the near future because of these \nchanges? Thank you. \nDr. Boolell: I cannot give you the exact date as to when the MoU will be signed but we \nare going to move the process as fast as possible. As to enlistment of transport services, we \nwill look into it favourably. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Edouard, do you have a question? Thank you very much. Yes, \nhon. François? \nMr François: Yes, thank you, Madam Speaker. If you allow me… \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nMr François: Madam Speaker, we are also talking about microchipping which is \ncompulsory for dog registration. May I seize this opportunity to request the hon. Minister to \nlook into the issue of non-availability of microchipping for live sheep and goat exportation \nfrom Rodrigues to Mauritius? \nDr. Boolell: Yes, this issue has been raised by the vets because usually goats and cattle \nimported from Rodrigues are microchipped but the ears are going to be tagged. \n\n42 \n \nMr François: Okay, thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, one more hon. Dr. Prayag. It is his question. \nDr. Prayag: Is there any proper legislation? Is the Ministry considering to put any \nlegislation to prevent dog breeders/dog owners to tamper with microchips, to remove \nmicrochips and to tamper with them? \nDr. Boolell: That’s a very good question. Only those who are properly trained will be \nallowed to microchip the dogs and you need to have people who are trained by specialised \nvets. And it is a course which is very effective but done by only those who have the acumen \nto do so. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, hon. Leader of the Opposition! \nMr Lesjongard: Thank you, Madam Speaker. The hon. Minister is a seasoned \npolitician. This is a case of apre lamor la tizann. Can I ask… \nMadam Speaker : L’amour ou la mort ? \nMr Lesjongard: La mort ! Pas l’amour ! \n(Interruptions) \nCan I ask the hon. Minister whether, he would confirm to the House that the \nprocurement for those microchips was only 15,000 and there are only 1000 microchips \navailable at the MSAW? \nDr. Boolell: This is an exercise for which tender was called for. The moment these \nmicrochips are going to be used, there will be fresh tender called for but you know, we \nproceed in a gradual manner, step by step and we are reaching out for a great outreach, much \nto your displeasure. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. A. Duval? \nMr A. Duval: Thank you. Madam Speaker, may I ask the hon. Minister given the total \nchaos which has surrounded the implementation of this measure, may we firstly know when \nwill the offences be implemented by the Police, by his Ministry? And secondly, when does he \nexpect total registration to be completed? And I hope that the imposition of fines and other \noffences will await la date butoir which should be in a much longer term. \nDr. Boolell: Well, the chaos is within the rank and file of the Opposition, Madam \nSpeaker. As far as we are concerned, we are addressing this problem in a very forceful \n\n43 \n \nmanner, with a humane and ecological approach and we are getting the results. Why? \nBecause even those who were reluctant to come, are coming forward and you can rest \nassured, we will deliver. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Do not argue! Do not argue! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker… \nMadam Speaker: Another question? \n(Interruptions) \nOne moment! Yes? \nMr A. Duval: The question was very simple. When will the offences be implemented? \nMadam Speaker: Offences cannot be implemented! \nMr A. Duval: When will the Police and his Ministry start application of the offences \nand…  \nMadam Speaker: That is better. \nMr A. Duval: …when does he think that the programme will be fully completed? \nMadam Speaker: If you can give us… \nDr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, the hon. Member is acting like a fool. Only fools like him \nwill rush in where there is no need to tread. There is time given and within the space, you \nknow, we are… \nMr Lesjongard: Well, what is that space? \n(Interruptions) \nDr. Boolell: There are 120 days during which, we will reach out to as many people as \npossible and since it is in relation to the offence, it is not going to be applied with a hammer \non the table… \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker… \nMadam Speaker: He has answered. \nDr. Boolell: Things will be done diligently and in a very humane manner. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, please… \n\n44 \n \nMadam Speaker: I am giving you but not the same question. \nMr A. Duval: It is not the same question. Madam Speaker, the question is – what \nhappens today? Now that the law est entrée en vigueur, what happens if a dog causes an \nincident? Will the Police be mandated to charge that person for failing to register the dog or \nnot? And until such time, when will the Police be mandated? \nMadam Speaker: One moment. It is very simple. The law must be applied once it is \nthe law. \nMr A. Duval: No, he has to answer… \nDr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, as I said, the law will be applied but it will not be applied \nabruptly and against the rights of individuals. \nMadam Speaker: Exactly! \n(Interruptions) \nOkay, enough on this question. \nDr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, as I have said, the law will be applied, but it will not be \napplied abruptly and against the rights of individuals. \nMadam Speaker: Exactly! Okay, that is enough on this question. We are only on the \nfirst question. So, I think, we can move on now. \nHon. Second Member for Savanne and Black River, Mr Jugurnauth! \nCHEMIN GRENIER MARKET FAIR PROJECT – DELAYS & OPERATION DATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/839",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 839,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/839) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Chemin Grenier Market Fair \nProject, he will state the reasons for the delay in the coming into operation thereof. \nMadam Speaker: Minister of Local Government, straight-forward answer, please!",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Yes, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker, the construction of the new Chemin Grenier Market Fair started on 11 \nOctober 2021 and was initially scheduled to be completed by 10 October 2022. Following the \napproval of the Central Procurement Board, the contract was awarded to RBRB Construction \n\n45 \n \nLtd on 31 August 2021 for an amount of Rs107.5 million, and this figure includes a \ncontingency sum of Rs5 million, excluding of VAT after a discount of Rs12.5 million. The \ncontractor took possession of the site on 27 September 2021. \nMadam Speaker, I am advised that the project faced several unforeseen challenges \nduring implementation, which caused delays. I am tabling a comprehensive report outlining \nthe detailed reasons for the delay in the completion of the Chemin Grenier Market Fair, \nwhich includes – \n• \nthe adverse climate conditions, including frequent heavy rainfalls and floodings \nonsite; \n• \nnon-performance of the former Project Manager, who was also the appointed \narchitect for the project; \n• \nchanges in the scope of the sub-structure due to the topography of the land; \n• \nunavailability of expatriate labour faced by the contractor, resulting from the \nrestrictive policies of the outgoing government; \n• \nadditional works allocated to the contractor for the construction drainage system, \nand \n• \npoor project management by the District Council of Savanne, among other \ncontributing factors. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the District Council of Savanne that the project will \nbe fully completed within the next two weeks. This will be followed by an expression of \ninterest exercise for the allocation of stalls to vendors. It is expected that the Chemin Grenier \nMarket Fair will become operational by mid-December 2025. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle! \nUNION PARK, BEEMANIQUE & CLUNY REGIONS – HEAVY TRAILERS – ROAD \nUSERS’ SAFETY & ENVIRONMENTAL THREATS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/840",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 840,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/840) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the safety and \nenvironmental threats caused to road users and inhabitants in the region of Union Park, \nBeemanick and Cluny by heavy motor vehicles and trailers regularly converging to and from \n\n46 \n \nthe Mare Chicose Landfill station, he will, for the benefit of the House, state if consideration \nwill be given for the establishment of an alternative route for the said vehicles.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, waste carriers normally proceed to Mare Chicose \nLandfill via Cluny Road, B83, starting from its junction with the Phoenix-Plaisance Road, \nA10, over a length of 8km, with a road width of 3 metres each in both directions. Due to the \nconstant movement of the waste carriers and with the expansion of the landfill, increased \npressure is being exerted on Cluny Road, representing road safety hazards along the Cluny \nRoad and at the Nouvelle France roundabout on the motorway M1. \nMadam Speaker, in July 2018, the then Ministry of Public Infrastructure and Land \nTransport, in collaboration with other concerned Ministries, was requested to undertake a \nsurvey on the current traffic of waste carriers to Mare Chicose and thereafter to look for \nalternative access road bypassing Cluny and other villages in the vicinity.  \nThe Road Development Authority was accordingly requested to undertake the survey, \nand the latter had, in 2019, worked out an alternative alignment of a total length of 5.2 km, \nconsisting of upgrading works along B83 Road over a length of 950 metres and construction \nof a new road over a length of 4.25 km. The cost estimate for the project amounted to Rs523 \nmillion, inclusive of VAT. However, the matter was not pursued further due to the high cost \ninvolved.  \nMadam Speaker, in May 2024, the matter was revived and the RDA was requested to \nreview its proposal for the alternative access to Mare Chicose. In October 2024, the RDA \nupdated the cost estimate from its initial proposal to Rs891 million, inclusive of VAT. The \nlatter additionally submitted a second proposal comprising the construction of a totally new \nroad starting on the motorway M1, from the access road leading to Beemanique Stone \nCrusher Ltd at Nouvelle France, passing through vegetation areas far away from inhabited \nzones, over a length of 4.25 km, to end after the village of Cluny onto the Cluny Road, B83. \nThe estimated cost of this second option is approximately Rs850 million, inclusive of VAT. \nMadam Speaker, upon assumption of office, I took note of the matter at a management \nmeeting on RDA projects, held on 21 January 2025, during which I expressed concerns \nregarding the feasibility of implementing the project, should the Mare Chicose Landfill be \nrelocated in the future. It was accordingly decided that the project would be kept in abeyance \nfor the time being as its implementation would depend on the priorities set by Government.  \n\n47 \n \nThe Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change has \napprised that there is currently no project or proposal for the relocation of the Mare Chicose \nLandfill. Previous attempts to identify an alternative site for landfill development during the \nyears 2015-2016 were unsuccessful. The contract for the vertical expansion of the existing \nlandfill, awarded in June 2024, is expected to extend its operational lifespan by \napproximately 15 years. A decision will be taken in due course as regards the provision of an \nalternative access road to Mare Chicose. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Ramdass: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I am perfectly aware of the financial \nconstraints, as enumerated by the hon. Minister. However, I do learn as well that a survey has \nbeen carried out since as far back as July 2018. There is a bridge at Beemanique which is \nused by these heavy trailers, which is clearly not adapted for these types of vehicles and the \nroad. As stated by the hon. Minister himself, it is way too narrow for these types of vehicles. \nSo, will the hon. Minister consider this a matter of priority, as it is a matter of concern both \nfrom an environmental point of view and in terms of safety for the road users of Beemanique \nand its surroundings? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister! \nMr Gunness: With regard to the Beemanique Bridge, it has been worked out and we \ncan probably consider to upgrade it.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay, next question! Mr Edouard, Fourth Member for Rodrigues! \nNURSING STAFF SHORTAGE – REGISTERED NURSES – DIRECT ENLISTMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/841",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 841,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/841) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nHealth and Wellness whether, in regard to the shortage of nursing staff in public healthcare \ninstitutions of the Republic including in Rodrigues Island and the limited seats available in \nthe Nursing School, he will state if consideration will be given for the enlisting of nurses duly \nregistered with the Nursing Council after successful completion of training in other schools \ndespite having not been formerly enlisted as Trainee Nurse in the public service. \n\n48",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, at the outset, I wish to reassure the House that \nGovernment is fully conscious of the shortage of nursing staff in our health institutions, \nincluding Rodrigues. \nMadam Speaker, as regards enlistment in the nursing cadre, I am informed that under \nthe present framework the entry grade is Trainee Nurse. Trainee Nurses are presently \nrequired to undergo a three-year training programme. The programme comprises theoretical \nand practical components in all aspects of the work of a nursing officer at approved \ninstitutions.  \nOn successful completion of this programme, which includes the passing of an \nexamination leading to the award of the National Diploma Level 6 in Nursing, Trainee \nNurses become eligible for registration with Nursing Council of Mauritius. Upon such \nregistration, they may be considered for appointment as Nursing Officers, subject to \navailability of vacancies.  \nThose who do not meet the entry criteria for the National Diploma in Nursing at the \nSchool of Nursing may opt to pursue training at Polytechnics Mauritius Ltd. These courses \nare also accredited and awarded by the Mauritius Institute of Health. \nMadam Speaker, the current scheme of service does not allow direct enlistment of \nnurses trained in institutions other than courses run by the Ministry. I am further informed \nthat the current scheme of service is being reviewed so as to make provision for the \nrecruitment of duly registered nurses trained in other institutions in the absence of qualified \nTrainee Nurses. This proposal is currently being examined by the Public Service \nCommission.  \nAs you may be aware, it takes a number of years to train a nursing officer. However, \nthe previous government did not recruit adequate number of nurses in order to ensure \navailability of sufficient number of nurses. It is only this year, in the Budget Speech of 2025-\n2026 that provision has been made for the enlistment of 1,000 nurses over the next three \nyears. A first batch of 300 Trainee Nurses has already been enlisted since 22 September 2025 \nand the training will start this month. My Ministry further plans to enlist 500 nurses in the \nnext financial year and 200 in financial year 2027-2028. Thus, in the coming years, we will \nhave sufficient number of trained nurses to cater for our public. \n\n49 \n \nMadam Speaker, moreover as an immediate measure to palliate the shortage of nursing \nofficers, my Ministry has already enlisted the services of 36 nursing officers on a sessional \nbasis. My Ministry is also considering the enlistment of additional 19 nurses. As regards, \nRodrigues Island, I am informed that the recruitment of nurses is carried out by Rodrigues \nRegional Assembly and the courses are dispensed by Polytechnics Mauritius and the School \nof Nursing. A batch of 166 students presently following courses at the School of Nursing, \nincluding 29 students from Rodrigues are expected to complete the diploma in Nursing \nCourse by June 2026. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nHon. First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart! \nPEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES – EMPLOYMENT – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/842",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 842,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/842) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity whether, in regard \nto people with disabilities, he will – \n(a)  for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number thereof \nemployed in the public and private sectors, respectively, and  \n(b)  state the additional measures his Ministry proposes to take to encourage the \nemployment and retention thereof in both sectors.",
      "answer": "Mr Subron: Madam Speaker, according to the Housing and Population Census 2022, \nMauritius had a total of 86,607 persons with disabilities. Of whom, 82,815 were aged 16 \nyears and above. 42,674 persons were retired, 6,009 were employed while 927 were actively \nseeking employment. I am herewith tabling the relevant data of the Housing and Population \nCensus 2022. \nAs regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Ministry of Public Service \nand Administrative Reforms that there are 110 persons with disabilities who are employed in \nthe public sector. With regards to data for the private sector, I am informed that the Ministry \nof Labour and Industrial Relations keeps no such record at its level. According to the registry \nof persons with disabilities kept at the level of the Training and Employment of Disabled \nPersons Board which is a parastatal body falling under the aegis of my Ministry, there are \nonly 527 persons with disabilities who are registered with the Board, searching for an \n\n50 \n \nemployment or training. Only around 900 employers employing more than 35 persons with \ndisabilities are registered with the Board. \nAt present, the Training and Employment of Disabled Persons Act 1996 provides that \nall employers with the workforce of 35 or more must employ 3% of their staff from among \npersons with disabilities. The Act also requires the maintenance of registers of persons with \ndisabilities as well as the register of employers, the establishment of a Hearing Committee to \nreview non-compliance and the possibility of requiring non-compliant employers to be fined. \nAlthough the above-mentioned framework was progressive for its time, it could not be \neffectively enforced and implemented due to various reasons, amongst them are lack of staff \nand associated resources. The number of trainings conducted over the years has \nsystematically declined while reporting and compliance mechanisms have in turn remained \nweak. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, first, as I previously informed \nthe House in my reply to a Parliamentary Question B/501 at the Sitting of 13 May 2025, my \nMinistry is currently working on reform initiatives for disability-related pensions and \nemployability element will be included in the new assessment model. Thus, the scope of the \nnew assessment model will include amongst others a job capacity evaluation of the persons \nwith disabilities and the panel will channel all such cases to the Training and Employment of \nDisabled Persons Board or eventually to the National Empowerment Authority under the \ncoming new law. We are expecting the first phase of the reform to be enforced very soon. \nSecond, with the coming of the not yet proclaimed the Protection and Promotion of the \nRights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2024, there will be a reviewed employment quota as \nwell as new monthly contribution will be included for non-compliance employers to the \nquota system. \nSecondly, the Training and Employment of Disabled Persons Act among others will be \nrepealed and a single authority namely, the National Empowerment Authority will be set up \nto take over its functions. \nThird, every employer shall provide reasonable accommodation to any employee who \nis a person with disability unless the employer can prove that the required adjustment would \nunduly prejudice the operation of the trade or business run by such employer and every \nemployer shall submit an annual report to the authority on the employment of person with \ndisability employed in his organisation not later than the 31 March of every year. \n\n51 \n \nThrough these measures, this government is laying the foundation for a more inclusive \nlabour market where persons with disabilities are able to access, retain and progress in \nemployment on an equal basis with others, thereby fulfilling both national commitments and \ninternational obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with \nDisabilities. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Dr. Prayag, question? \nI think it would be the last question. \nHon. First Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES – MINISTER’S VISIT – JEUX DE LA COMMISSION DE LA \nJEUNESSE ET DES SPORTS DE L’OCEAN INDIEN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/843",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 843,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/843) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nYouth and Sports whether, in regard to his recent visit to Rodrigues Island, he will – \n(a)  state the – \n(i)  \npurposes and outcomes thereof;  \n(ii)  measures envisaged for the enhancement of sports in terms of infrastructure \nand development thereat, and  \n(b)  criteria for the determination of prize money to medal-winning athletes of the \nrecent Jeux de la Commission de la Jeunesse et des Sports de l’Ocean Indien, \nindicating the total sum disbursed.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, allow me to take the time of the House to underline \nonce again that Rodrigues is an autonomous island, operating under the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly Act 2001 and Section 26 (1), thereof provides that Rodrigues Regional Assembly \nbe responsible for the formulation and implementation of policy in respect of matters relating \nto youth and sports. \nHowever, Madam Speaker, while respecting the autonomy of Rodrigues, I have always \nconsidered that it is my duty as Minister of the Republic to ensure that Rodriguan youths and \nathletes benefit from the same level of attention and support as their counterpart in Mauritius. \nFrom the very outset of my mandate, I have given special consideration to Rodrigues, \n\n52 \n \nrecognising the immense talent, determination and potential of its young people. In this \ncontext, I have already undertaken two visits to Rodrigues. My most recent visit in early \nSeptember 2025 was particularly significant. Its primary objective was to hold final \nconsultations with the sports community of Rodrigues so that their specific concerns and \naspirations could be duly reflected in the provisions being made for them in the forthcoming \nSports Bill. At the same time, I had the distinct honour of personally handing over cash prizes \nto the Rodriguan athletes who so valiantly won medals at the recent CJSOI Games in \nSeychelles. In total, an amount of Rs232,000 was disbursed, benefitting 17 Rodriguan \nathletes and three coaches.  \nLet me emphasise, Madam Speaker, that the CJSOI Games do not normally fall under \nthe cash prize scheme of my Ministry. In fact, in 2022 when the CJSOI Games were held in \nMauritius, no cash prize was awarded to our medallists. Yet in light of the remarkable \nperformance of our national team in Seychelles, upon my initiative, an exceptional allocation \nhas been granted to our young medal winners and their coaches in recognition of their efforts \nand sacrifices. The prizes awarded were as follows – \n• \nRs15,000 to each gold medallist; \n• \nRs10,000 to each silver medallist; \n• \nRs7,000 to each bronze medallist, and  \n• \nRs7,000 to each coach, and \n• \nRs5,000 to each assistant coach. \nMadam Speaker, through these actions, my message is clear, while Rodrigues enjoys \nautonomy in youth and sports matters, this Government stands firmly by the side of \nRodriguan youth, their victory are our victories, their aspirations are our aspirations and their \ndevelopment will always remain a national priority. \nMadam Speaker: You have a supplementary? Yes! \nMs Collet: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Will the hon. Minister undertake to table \ndetails of the beneficiaries in Rodrigues? \nMr Nagalingum: I have the list. The list is long. I can table the list if you want. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \n\n53 \n \nYes, Mr François! \nMr François: Madam Speaker, thank you. The hon. Minister mentioned that the Sports \nBill is coming. May I ask him whether after he met the representatives of Movement Sportif \nde Rodrigues, he is agreeable to consider their request and proposal for the setting up of the \nCROS for Rodrigues?  \nMr Nagalingum: We are still in discussion with the people concerned and like I said, \nthe Sports Bill is coming very soon and you will get an idea about what we are proposing. \nMr François: Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: I think we might stop here for lunch. We have got two minutes. We \nwon’t be able to go through another question. So, I raise for one and a half hour. Thank you. \nAt 12.58 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.28 p.m., with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Please, be seated.  \nThe hon. Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle. \nFERNEY-DEUX FRÈRES AREA – TRANSPORT SERVICES PROVISION – TAXI \nLICENCE HOLDERS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/844",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 844,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/844) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the provision of transport services \nto inhabitants of the southeastern coastal area from Ferney to Deux Frères, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information as to \nthe number of Public Service Vehicle Licence holders operating taxi services along the said \narea.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the National Land \nTransport Authority that 69 taxis are licensed to operate from 13 different localities between \nFerney and Deux Frères. 13 public service vehicles taxi licences have also been licensed to \noperate in the nearby village of Quatre-Soeurs.  \nI am informed that 90% of these taxis operate between Deux Frères and Mahebourg at \nseparate fares, meaning taxi train and supplement existing bus service, which is authorised \nunder section 103(4) of the Road Traffic Act.  \n\n54 \n \nI am further informed that there has neither been any formal complaint lodged at the level \nof the NLTA from the inhabitants in regard to transport problems nor has there been any \nadditional request for public service taxi licences at this stage in time. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Ramdass.  \nMr Ramdass: In view of the poor service provided to those inhabitants, would the hon. \nMinister consider the possibility of the advisability of having a survey carried out by the \nNLTA to determine how many of these PSV licence holders are actually operating? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the NLTA is mandated to do \nsuch exercise. We can do it. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Another supplementary? \nMr Ramdass: Would the hon. Minister also consider the possibility of calling an \nExpression of Interest for the eventual issue of additional PSV licences? \nMr Osman Mahomed: If the survey warrants more taxis to be operated in the region, \nwe will certainly do that.  \nCOMPULSORY DOGS’ REGISTRATION –  ANIMAL WELFARE ACT – \nAMENDMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/845",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 845,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/845) Dr S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the compulsory microchipping and registration of all dogs with the Mauritius \nSociety for Animal Welfare with effect from 01 October 2025, he will state whether \nconsideration will be given for an amendment to the Animal Welfare Act to allow a \ndecentralization of the process island-wide, including a mass dog registration campaign by \nallowing microchipping and registration with private veterinary surgeons and clinics.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/838) \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue. \nMAURITIUS QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY – MALIAN DELEGATION VISIT– \nMOU/AGREEMENT SIGNATURE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/846",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 846,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/846) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the visit \n\n55 \n \nof a delegation from the Republic of Mali to the Mauritius Qualifications Authority (MQA) \nfrom 25 to 29 August 2025, he will state whether the prior approval of the board of the MQA \nand of his Ministry respectively, were sought and obtained therefor and, if so, indicate – \n(a) \nthe purposes thereof, and \n(b) \nwhether any agreement and/or memorandum of understanding was/were signed in \nthe course thereof and, if so, give details thereof and table copy thereof.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Mauritius \nQualifications Authority that a Malian delegation visited the MQA from 25 to 29 August \n2025. My Ministry was informed about the said visit on 22 August 2025.  \nHowever, officials from my Ministry asked the MQA to seek the prior approval of its \nBoard first and to submit such request well in advance in order to allow timely procession for \napproval. My Ministry did this with the view to ensure that there was due diligence as \nclearance from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs also had to be sought as well. \n I wish to inform the House that no formal approval was given neither by my Ministry \nnor by the Board of the MQA prior to the visit of the delegation from Mali.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as for part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the House that \nthe purpose of the visit of the delegation from Mali was a study tour on matters pertaining to \ncertification and implementation of the Mauritian National Qualifications Framework \nrecognition to prior learning and qualifications development in the TVET sector. \nAs for part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that no formal agreement and \nno Memorandum of Understanding was signed. I am told that the visit was purely exploratory \nand merely for sharing of experience. It did not entail any bidding commitments on the part \nof the MQA. \nThank you.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes.  \nMr A. Duval: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it’s in fact very serious that the Director of the \nMQA took it upon himself without consulting neither the Ministry nor the Board nor the \nMinistry of Foreign Affairs before allowing a delegation from Mali where there was recently \nun coup d’état, to come.  \nAnd I understand that the Board also has taken his due.  \n\n56 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question. Let’s have your question.  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that was statement of fact. He \nsaid that the Director of the MQA had taken upon himself to decide. He could ask whether \nthat was the case.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: The Minister never mentioned that the Director took it upon \nhimself. So, ask the question.  \nMr A. Duval: The issue being a serious one and the Board having required explanation \nfrom the Director, who has still not given it, has the Minister since and in view…  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: He is making a statement or what? \nMr A. Duval: In view that no explanation had been given, what is the Minister going \nto do about this? \nThe Deputy Speaker: What action will the Minister take now?  \nDr. Gungapersad: I will definitely leave it to the Board because there was a request by \nthe Board for a written explanation regarding same and I am awaiting the report from the \nBoard. The Board will take whatever action has to be taken.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Question!  \nMr A. Duval: Once the Board takes its decision, will the hon. Minister  make that \ninformation available to the House as to the outcome of this matter which is very serious \nbecause they have bypassed proper procedure and bypassed the Minister himself? \nDr. Gungapersad: We believe in transparency and needful will be done.  \nThe Deputy Speaker:  The hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes.  \nQUATRE BORNES – JAWAHARLAL NEHRU ROAD – RESURFACING WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/847",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 847,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/847) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the Jawaharlal Nehru \nRoad, also known as Bassin Road, in Quatre Bornes, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Road Development Authority, information as to whether the resurfacing \nthereof is being considered and, if so, give details thereof and, if not, why not.  \n\n57",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, ex-Route Bassin at \nQuatre Bornes stretches over 3.9 km and falls under the jurisdiction of the Road \nDevelopment Authority.  \nI am informed by the RDA that the Jawaharlal Nehru Road maybe divided into two \nsections as follows – \n• \nSection 1 from La Louise Quatre Bornes Taxi Stand to the roundabout along Phoenix-\nBeau Songes Road B130 stretching over 2.6 km, and  \n• \nSection 2 from roundabout along Phoenix-Beau Songes Road up to La Vigie-La \nBrasserie- Beau Songes Link Road Phase 2 over a stretch of 1.3 km.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard section 1 of Jawaharlal Nehru Road, I am informed \nby the RDA that as part of its programme of work for road maintenance and minor works for \nFinancial Year 2025-2026, it has included localised resurfacing works along that stretch \nwhere severe subsidence has been noted. \nI am further informed that for the time being, only localised road repair work is \nenvisaged because the National Development Unit has future drain projects thereon as part of \nits Land Drainage Masterplan for flood mitigation measures for the regions of Candos and La \nLouise.  \nIn order to mitigate hazards to road users thereat, the RDA has issued work order for \nthe localised resurfacing works along Jawaharlal Nehru Road under its framework agreement \ncontract. The work order has been awarded to Gamma Construction Ltd for the contract sum \nof Rs2,513,160.07 and resurfacing works are schedule to start by end of this month and are \nexpected to end in mid-November.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to section 2 of Jawaharlal Nehru Road, I am \ninformed by the RDA that land will have to be acquired to widen the road to 7 metres with \n1.5 metre shoulder footpath and drains on both sides of the road. Currently, the width of the \nroad varies from 3.5 to 5 metres. The land acquisition process has been initiated and is \ncurrently ongoing. \nMoreover, the upgrading work along this section requires the reconstruction of three \nbridges and two box culverts. The cost estimate for the works is Rs125 million and same will \nbe implemented subject to funds being made available and completing the acquisition of the \nland required for the project.  \n\n58 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Yes. \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, M. le président. Aux noms des habitants de Bassin, je \ntiens à remercier l’honorable ministre pour sa réponse.  \nWould the hon. Minister inform the House whether temporary measures will be put in \nplace to ensure the safety of motorists and pedestrians while awaiting for resurfacing? \nMr Gunness: Obviously, we will take all measures. I will pass over the message to the \nRDA to take all necessary measures. In the meantime, the contract work will start this month. \nMs Anquetil: Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \nPRIVATE HEALTHCARE INSTITUTIONS – TREATMENT COST REGULATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/848",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 848,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/848) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the private \nhealthcare institutions, he will state if consideration will be given for the regulation of the \ncost of treatment and of services being practiced thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, private health institutions in Mauritius are \npresently governed by the Private Health Institutions Act 1989 which sets out the basic \nrequirements for licensing in compliance with health and safety standards. However, the Act \ndoes not empower my Ministry to regulate the cost of treatment and services being provided \nby the private operators. \nI wish to inform the House that my Ministry is currently working on a new Private \nHealth Institutions Bill with the technical support of a consultant made available by the \nEuropean Union. The proposed draft bill and its accompanying regulations will modernise \nthe legislation by introducing new provisions on transparency and accountability.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, regarding the cost of treatment and services in private sector is \na complex matter which requires careful balancing of patient rights, professional autonomy \nand investment incentives. The way forward will therefore depend on the outcome of wide \nconsultations that my Ministry will hold with all stakeholders, including patients’ \nassociations, healthcare professionals, private operators as well as insurance companies. \n\n59 \n \nThis Government is committed to ensure that our citizens refrain from having recourse \nto the private clinics. That is why it is our policy to continually upgrade and improve our \npublic hospitals by setting up specialised units with cutting edge technology, enhancing \ncapacity of our staff through continuous training and upgrading infrastructure, and providing \nstate of the art equipment. We are also expanding our agreements with overseas hospitals so \nthat Mauritian patients may have access to a specialised treatment abroad whenever required \nfree of charge. \nIn the same breath, the number of visiting consultants and specialists in our public \nhospitals has been extended so that more complex cases are treated within our hospitals. It is \nalso the policy of my Ministry to encourage renowned foreign private hospitals to establish \nthemselves in Mauritius with a view to increase competition. Thus, resulting in lowering the \ncost of treatment in clinics.  \nI am also informed that health insurance companies play a significant role by ensuring \nthat charges remain within reasonable limits. Let me remind the House that over the last \ndecade, the policy was clearly to weaken our public hospitals through understaffing, \ninsufficient training and schemes such as zero interest loans to push patients towards private \ntreatment. The result has been an erosion of trust in the public sector and greater dependency \non costly private care. \nThis Government has taken a different course. Our objective is to rebuild confidence in \nthe public health system, expand access to quality care free of charge and ensure that patients \nwho turn to the private do so out of choice, not out of necessity. The forthcoming Private \nHealth Institution’s Bill will be a milestone in this process. I must emphasise that the question \nof regulating prices in the private sector remains open, and the decision will be taken after \nconsultation with stakeholders. \nMr A. Duval: Without expressing any views on the public health institution services \nright now, the fact is thousands of Mauritians go to private clinics. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Your question, please. Put your question.  \nMr A. Duval: I am coming to it! Prices have increased since you have taken office. For \nexample, by 18% in terms of doctors’ fees, and clinical and infrastructure fees around 15% in \nthe last year. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Minister has just mentioned that the Act as it is does \nnot allow him to regulate the fees. \n\n60 \n \nMr A. Duval: Yes. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Can you put your question now? \nMr A. Duval: Therefore, does the hon. Minister not see it, in public interest, as an \nurgent measure, to curb the inflation of private healthcare prices which is unchecked at the \nmoment? \nMr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, all of us know that if you are going to impose \nconditions, you are going to fix up the fees. This will be a deterrent for these institutions to \ninvest. Health is a sector where billions of rupees are required. So, instead of doing that, the \nfirst concern of our Government is to improve the quality of service in our hospitals which \nhad completely gone down for the last ten years. \nLet us try to upgrade it and convince our people to come towards our hospitals. I have \nhundreds of cases where they go the private clinic and once the money is exhausted, they turn \ntowards our hospitals. We have the best type of care in our hospitals. My duty is to improve \nthat, but I cannot compel the private clinics to bring down the price.  \nIf you are going to impose it, no new entrants will be there. And unfortunately, nothing \nnew can be done. That is the reason why we believe that imposition of prices – I was Minister \nof Commerce for about 4-5 years, I remember. Thousands of articles were under the price \ncontrol at that time. Unfortunately, that led to much problems because no new comers came, \nthe price remained the same, and there was no new investment. That is the reason why we do \nnot believe too much on price control. \nMr A. Duval: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, please! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Last question.  \nMr A. Duval: Yes. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, public perception in public service is \nsomething else. I am quite surprised that the hon. Minister does not see it necessary to at least \ncurb the huge increases. Let me just ask if the hon. Minister… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question! Put your question! \nMr A. Duval: … is aware that insurance costs, be it health insurance or the indirect \neffect on car insurance, insurance for public transportation, all of these are following that \npattern because of the huge unchecked cost of private health institutions. I will ask again: will \nthe hon. Minister not appoint… \n\n61 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: He has already answered the question! \nMr A. Duval: …a team to see the options without having to go and regulate, but, at \nleast, to go into proposals on how we are going to control these prices? \nThe Deputy Speaker: Any other questions? This has already been answered. \nMr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I can advise and I can encourage. The best that I \ncan do – legally, I do not have the right –we are bound to improve the conditions of service in \nour public hospitals. We have to do away with the perception. That was the perception of the \nprevious government, not ours. We are trying to improve as much as we can. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, one last question, hon. Dr. Prayag! \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. I agree that it is not the purview of \nthe Ministry of Health to regulate the prices of private health institutions. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question! Put your question! \nDr. Prayag: It falls under the Ministry of Commerce. I appreciate your answer. Is the \nMinistry planning to negotiate with foreign Indian hospitals so that at least they can bring \ndown the cost of local prices for Mauritians going abroad? \nMr Bachoo: This is exactly what we are doing. The House will be aware that over a \ndozen of new internationals hospitals are coming towards Mauritius and we are having a \nseries of Memorandum of Understanding with them. They are also sending us experts time \nand again. I can announce in the days to come that we will be having about four top \nspecialists coming to Mauritius from Chennai in order to help us in our hospitals. \nMr A. Duval: The prices are still going up! \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River \nSouth East! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 10 – RECREATIONAL SPORTS FACILITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/849",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 849,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/849) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the recreational sports facilities, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Sports Council, information as to \nthe number thereof it operates in Constituency No. 10 Montagne Blanche and Grand River \nSouth East, indicating the respective location thereof and activities being provided thereat. \n\n62",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Mauritius Sports \nCouncil that there is one sports facility in Constituency No. 10 that falls under its purview, \nnamely the Multi-Use Games Area (MUGA) located at Caroline. The facility accommodates \nvarious activities such as – \n• \nmini soccer; \n• \npétanque; \n• \nZumba sessions; \n• \nrecreational activities for children and senior citizens; \n• \nopen air gym; \n• \ntraining, and \n• \nwalking or jogging along its dedicated track. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the House may also wish to note that my Ministry has a youth \nhub which houses a sports hall in Montagne Blanche. The hub which was revamped provides \nthe following activities – \n• \nTaekwondo; \n• \nTable Tennis; \n• \nBadminton; \n• \nDames; \n• \nIndoor games (Scrabble, Carom), and \n• \nGuitar courses. \nMoreover, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry also dispenses the following training \nin secondary schools and MITD centres of that region – \n• \nFamily Life Education; \n• \nNational Youth Civic Service, and \n• \nJeunes Enterprises. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes. Now, the hon. Second Member for Grand Baie and Poudre \nd'Or! \n\n63 \n \nASBESTOS MANAGEMENT – QUALIFIED MINISTRY’S OFFICERS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/850",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 850,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/850) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in \nregard to asbestos, he will state the number of officers of his Ministry qualified and trained \nby accredited institutions in the management thereof, indicating the – \n(a) \ntypes of Personal Protective Equipment provided thereto since 2015 and \n(b) \nnumber of visits effected by the said officers on the site of housing units \ncontaining same requiring dismantling since January 2024 to date.",
      "answer": "Mr Bhagwan: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that the \nEnforcement Unit of the Solid Waste Management Division of my Ministry consists of 14 \nofficers who are involved only in the supervision of the dismantling of the housing units \ncontaining cemented asbestos sheets for removal and disposal process. Site visits are effected \nprior to dismantling to assess quantity and state of asbestos sheets and supervise the \ndismantling process till carting away to the landfill. \nWith regard to training; from 21 to 25 November 2022, officers of the Enforcement \nUnit of the Division have received training on HAZWOPER site operations which was \nconducted by Polyeco Ltd., a Greek company, which has extensive experience in \nmanagement of hazardous wastes. Moreover, one officer was trained on HAZMAT \nspecialised equipment in August 2025 conducted by consultant of the National Disaster Risk \nReduction Management Centre. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, the technical \nenforcement officers who carry out visual inspections of dismantling of the housing units \ncemented asbestos sheets have been provided with Personal Protective Equipment comprising \namongst others disposable overall, dust masks and safety boots. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, concerning part (b) of the question, the number of visits \neffected by the Division from 2024 to date is 35. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, asbestos houses \nwhich are being dismantled by contractors who are hired by the Ministry and there is a \nconstant follow-up of works which have been done by contractors especially with regard to \nprotective equipment. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, you have supplementary question? \n\n64 \n \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Will the hon. Minister inform the \nHouse what further training will be provided or any other ongoing Health Surveillance \nProgramme is put in place for the officers potentially exposed to asbestos fibres in the course \nof their duties? Thank you. \nMr Bhagwan: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, there is a planned programme which is in \nshape and will be soon implemented not only by my Ministry that by the Ministry of Labour \nand Industrial Relations and the safety division also. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac ! \nCONSTITUENCY NO.13 – BUS TRANSPORT SERVICES – COMPLAINTS & \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/851",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 851,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/851) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the bus routes in \nConstituency Number 13, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National \nTransport Corporation, information as to whether it is in presence of complaints from \ncommuters along same regarding the transport services being provided and, if so, indicate \nthe measures, if any, taken in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, further to concerns raised by the \nhon. Member during the Sitting of the House of 10 December 2024 regarding bus services \nin Constituency No.13, the NLTA was tasked to assess the prevailing situation and to come \nup with appropriate remedial measures. \nI am informed by NLTA that a meeting was held with the NTC and individual \noperators concerned on 06 March 2025. The bus operators were instructed to improve the \nlevel of bus services in those regions and according to the NLTA, improvements have been \nnoted along most of those routes. Several checks subsequently carried out an operation of \nbuses at Souillac, Camp Diable and L’Escalier in the months of June and July 2025. \nComing to the substantive question, I am informed by the NTC that the NTC serves \nthe following 8 routes. I am not going to list all of them but it is route No. 66A, the \ndescription is there, if you want, I can give it to. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, you can. \nMr Osman Mahomed: No. 6/6A, No. 7, No. 61/61A, No. 34, No. 67, No. 79, No. \n133 and No.197. Route 10 which extends over 40 km also plies through Rivière des \n\n65 \n \nGalets to Mahebourg via Souillac, Camp Diable and L’Escalier and is served by 35 \nindividual operators at an interval of 15 minutes at peak hours. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the NTC that repeated complaints \nespecially with regard to unavailability of buses along the above routes are being received. \nFor the period of June/July 2025 to September 2025, a total of 50 complaints has been \nreceived specifically on account of irregular bus services which is attributable to frequent \nbreakdown of Yutong and Nissan buses deployed on those routes. \nI am further made to understand that the NTC is encountering difficulties to procure \nspare parts in view of the need to abide by directive 47 of the Procurement Policy Office \nwith regard to mandatory use of e-procurement system. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I personally met her Excellency, the Chinese Ambassador \nduring courtesy call recently on 01 September 2025 and I have requested her to facilitate \nthe commercialisation of spare parts of Yutong buses locally and I am given to understand \nthat the Embassy is exploring the possibility of having an MoU between Yutong company \nand NTC that should theoretically resolve the problem. \nIn fact, the NTC redeployed one additional bus… \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Is your answer long, hon. Minister? Because the question is \nsimple, what actions are you taking? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes, just to complete and to say because since it is \nConstituency No.13, a massive amount of Rs24.6 million has been injected by the TRMSU \nfor construction of a traffic centre at Rivière des Anguilles. The traffic centre will be \noperational this week and will is expected to enhance the bus transport services in \nConstituency No.13. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member! \nMr Jhummun: Relating to the incident regarding some buses that took fire, I would \nlike to ask the hon. Minister whether the fire prevention mechanism systems were in place, \nif not whether an enquiry will be undertaken? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in fact, yes, there was an issue. I am \nprivy to information which I can give to the hon. Member since it is requested in the \nquestion. The former General Manager of the NTC was given a quotation on 29 January \n2020 to change what is called the firebombs – from what is written here. It is supposed to \nexplode when there is fire and quench the fire but same were not changed. That was four \nyears ago – so, we have an issue. The new General Manager, when he assumed office in \nJuly 2025, immediately asked for a quotation and I am given to understand that same will \n\n66 \n \nbe replaced and I have asked him to do so expeditiously. I am told it is going to cost Rs2.44 \nmillion. \nAs regards whether an enquiry will have to be conducted, I can ask the Board of the \nNTC to look into this issue. \nThe Deputy Speaker:  The hon. Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac. \nOLD BRIDGES & FOOTBRIDGES – ISLAND-WIDE AUDIT – REPAIRS & \nREINFORCEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/852",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 852,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/852) Dr. Ms. R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the old bridges \nand footbridges, he will state if, following the collapse of an old bridge at Tranquebar on \n21 April 2025, his Ministry has carried out an audit to assess the state thereof island-wide \nand, if not, whether consideration will be given therefor and repairs and reinforcement \nthereof be carried out accordingly.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, first of all, I would like to clarify that the \nincident to which the hon. Member is referring to occurred on 21 April 2025 and not 21 \nFebruary 2025. \nSecondly, I wish to emphasize that bridges and footbridges are constructed \nthroughout the island on both classified and non-classified roads. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, \nas regard classified roads, that is, motorways A and B roads. These fall under the \nresponsibility of the Road Development Authority which as the highway authority is \nresponsible for the construction, care, maintenance and improvement of these roads and \nrelated structures. \nThe RDA maintain an inventory of all classified roads and associated structures \nincluding vehicular and pedestrian bridges and culverts which form an essential part of \nnational road network. \nIn order to preserve these assets and ensure their structural safety, the Bridge \nManagement System was set up in 2012. The BMS serves as a comprehensive audit \nmechanism which enables the RDA to maintain a detailed database of bridges, record the \nstructural defects and formulate a priority list of maintenance and rehabilitation works \nbased on condition indices. \nSince the establishment of the BMS, 21 bridges have been rehabilitated or \nreconstructed on a priority basis. The RDA has recently reassessed the condition of bridges \non classified roads island-wide and updated the inventory accordingly. A list of bridges \n\n67 \n \nrequiring intervention has been prepared and implementation will be carried out gradually \nover the coming financial years given the significant investment involved. \nAt present, the construction of 3 bridges namely, Grand Sable, Beau Champ and \nRamdine, Eau Coulée is ongoing and is expected to be completed within this financial \nyear. In addition, contracts for the John Kennedy bridge at Vacoas and the Royal Bridge at \nPort Louis near hotel Pakistan have been awarded and works will commence shortly while \nbidding documents for the Haute Rive bridge and Riviére du Rempart have already been \nlaunched. \nWith regard to footbridges, there are presently 20 located along classified roads. In \nrecent years, RDA has undertaken the construction or rehabilitation of six of these and a \nfurther three footbridges – Mapou, Pamplemousses, and Calebasses along the M2 are being \nrehabilitated in the 2025-2026 financial year as part of the RDA’s ongoing programme. All \nthese works are carried out with a focus on safe passage for road users and the long-term \nintegrity of our road network. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards non-classified roads which fall under the \nresponsibility of local authorities, I am informed that following the Tranquebar incident, no \ncomprehensive island-wide structural audit has been carried out for bridges and footbridges \nunder their purview. This is mainly due to a lack of in-house technical expertise such as \nstructural engineers and the absence of dedicated funds which limit their ability to conduct \ndetailed assessments.  \nLocal authorities across the island have varying capacities to manage their bridges and \nfootbridges. Some, such as those in Vacoas-Phoenix and Quatre Bornes, rely mainly on visual \ninspections and require external expertise for comprehensive structural assessments. In \nCurepipe, most bridges are reported as structurally sound although a few require urgent \nrepairs while enlargement works are being undertaken by the National Development Unit.  \nIn Savanne, the Pont Rouge footbridge has been found to be severely damaged, \nwhereas other bridges have already been repaired. In Moka, major reconstruction works have \nbeen completed, while in Rivière du Rempart and Grand Port, attention is being given to \nminor repairs, with major works requiring external support. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry will provide technical guidance and collaboration \nas and when requested to support local authorities in maintaining bridges and footbridges \nfalling under their purview. \n\n68 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Dr. Ms Daureeawo, do you have a question? \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Has the Ministry received any complaints in relation to the current \nstate of our bridges and footbridges? \nMr Gunness: As far as I can see, I have not received any formal complaints, even by \nthe local authorities yet. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Babajee! \nMr Babajee: I will ask the Minister if he has got any complaints in regard to the \nTamarin bridge which started yielding… \nThe Deputy Speaker: He does not have any complaints. \nMr Babajee: …at the start and as a matter of urgency, it is the only way to go to the \nWest. If so, can we have a look as a matter of urgency? \nMr Gunness: Among the 21 bridges which have rehabilitated and reconstructed on a \npriority basis, I can see Tamarin bridge is in the list. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \nISLETS AROUND MAURITIUS – ECOSYSTEM PRESERVATION –TRADE & \nTOURISM ACTIVITIES REGULATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/853",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 853,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/853) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the islets around \nMauritius, he will state the framework being envisaged for the regulation of trade and tourism \nactivities thereat with a view to preserving the inherent ecosystem and biodiversity thereof \nand preventing further environmental degradation thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to refer the House to my reply to the \nPNQ of 6 May 2025. The House will recall that I referred to the situation that prevailed in \nthat reply on Ile aux Bénitiers. That islet had witnessed an increase in unregulated \ncommercial activities, including informal food and beverage operations, unauthorised \nrecreational setups and erection of structures that are inconsistent with the land use and \nenvironmental planning principles. These activities have raised concerns regarding sanitation, \nwaste management, environmental degradation, negative effects on biodiversity and the \necosystem as well as the preservation of public access and cultural value. \n\n69 \n \nEver since then, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, there have been several meetings under the \nchairmanship of the Deputy Prime Minister. And I must state that the work was not only \nabout Ile aux Bénitiers but also started work about other islets around Mauritius. As regards \nthe work that has already been initiated on Ile aux Bénitiers, as a pilot case, in order to \nregulate existing trade and tourism activities while ensuring the protection of the island’s \nfragile ecosystem, we have delimited a temporary recreational zone to accommodate \nbarbecue operators and handicraft sellers. At the same time, a comprehensive masterplan has \nbeen elaborated in consultation with all the relevant authorities, with a view to establishing a \npermanent recreational zone that balances economic activities with the preservation of \nbiodiversity. So, we are going for Ile aux Bénitiers approximately on two thirds for \nconservation and a third for the rest.   \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, a sum of Rs8 million has been provided in the Financial Year \n2025-2026 for the cleaning of islets. Along this line, consideration is being given for the \nmanagement strategy used for Ile aux Bénitiers to be replicated to other islets around \nMauritius. It has been planned – as recommended and suggested by the hon. Deputy Prime \nMinister – that we would, after Ile aux Bénitiers, also be going to visit some of the islets \naround Mauritius and we would be starting with some in the North. And the issue therefore, is \nto promote a balanced approach that encourages responsible tourism and economic \nopportunities while preserving the natural heritage of our coastal and marine assets.  \nSo, in this perspective, I would like to thank all those who have collaborated in this \neffort; all relevant stakeholders, obviously starting with the Deputy Prime Minister and also \nthe Minister of Environment, Minister of Agro-Industry and their respective Ministries and \nthe Ministry of Tourism and Ministry of Local Government as well and all the other local \nauthorities that have been very helpful in the process. \nI must however add that at this juncture, we are reflecting in line with what your \nquestion is, on which will be the authority eventually that will be responsible for the \nmanagement of all the islets. Will it be under the Beach Authority as we had discussed or will \nit be under a dedicated authority under the Ministry of Environment with all les acteurs \nconcernés? But there needs to be an effort and a dedicated effort in order to ensure that \nwhatever we started at Ile aux Bénitiers under the chairmanship of the meeting with hon. \nDeputy Prime Minister, that we continue it vis-à-vis other islets. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, do you have a supplementary? \n\n70 \n \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Yes. Is there any proposed timeline for completion of the works on \nall our islets? \nMr Mohamed: Well, in actual fact, I looked at the documents that have been given to \nme and the number of islets that exist around Mauritius, and there are indeed quite a few. And \nif I was to look at it, there are from memory, approximately 52 and out of the 52, there are \ntwo of them that are privately owned. So, we are concerned with about 50 of them. So, going \nto all of them will take the time that it takes and obviously at this juncture, we rely on the \ngenerosity and collaboration of the National Coast Guard to take all officers there. We do not \nhave dedicated vessels to take us to each and every island. So, that is why far from trying to \nput a timeline on the whole process – what is important here is results and it will take the \ntime that it takes because at the end of the day, we have to give results.  \nAnd within this mandate, we hope that we will have replicated the excellent work that \nhas been done for Ile aux Bénitiers on other islets with the collaboration of all my friends in \nCabinet and Members of Parliament who are also very helpful in connecting us with other \npeople and those who are operating on these islets. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \nSINGAMANIE VILLAGE, BOIS MARCHAND – SQUATTERS – \nREGULARISATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/854",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 854,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/854) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to Singamanie Village \nnear Bois Marchand, he will state the number of squatters currently residing thereat, \nindicating the plan, if any, to regularise the situation thereof and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to thank the hon. Member for her \nquestion. I am informed that there are some 41 squatters in the area commonly known as \nSingamanie Village over State land at Bois Marchand, out of which, 23 are pre-July 2015 and \n18 are post-July 2015.  \nNow, the reason why very often we refer in the jargon of the Ministry of Housing and \nLand to the pre/post-July 2015, is basically there are two treatments that are afforded to those \nwho are pre and those who are post. It is a question of policy that was decided at the level of \nthe Ministry as their settlement is either on the réserve of Rivière des Calebasses or located \nclose to a sewage treatment plant thereat. \n\n71 \n \nIt is unfortunate because of those realities on the ground, we cannot consider \nregularising them in situ, as I have explained the reason for that. However, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir, I wish to reassure the House that my Ministry is actively looking into various \nother possibilities to address the situation. \nI had stated in my reply to PQ B/754 that my Ministry, in this regard, is also working \nupon recommendations for regularising the post-2015 squatters because the previous \ngovernment had decided not to regularise the post-2015 squatters.  \nI think we have to take that into consideration, and I take advantage of this particular \nquestion to give that information. Ever since I came into office, I decided to request the \nofficers of the Ministry to carry out a survey island-wide to know what is the real problem of \nsquatters around Mauritius. We managed to carry out a survey on all State lands. Obviously, \nthere are also squatters on private lands. The residential and non-residential squatters per \ndistrict – \n• \nin the District of Port Louis, there are 306 squatters; \n• \nin the District of Pamplemousses, there are 80; \n• \nin the District of Rivière du Rempart, there are 52; \n• \nin the District of Flacq, there are 89; \n• \nin the District of Grand Port, there are 35, and \n• \nin the District of Savanne, there are 5. \nI say again, that does not include the squatters on private lands.  \nSo, to that 700 or so figure – the total is, in fact, 750 on State lands –, I would have \nthought that we are close to the figure of almost more than a thousand or slightly more than a \nthousand. So, yes, there is the need to address the issue – and we are doing that – of all \nsquatters. But I have to also – as I have said in the previous reply – ensure that in the process, \nwe do not go for a policy decision that encourages squatting. Squatting cannot be an easy \nway to obtain facilities from government and homes. We should try to bring them within the \nmainstream, which is to register to obtain a proper registration and bring in the effort to get \nthem a place and roof over their heads. But I must say that ever since July 2015 and to date, \nthe figures of squatters have increased tremendously. That is because the previous \ngovernment did nothing to address the problem of squatters, and we will. \n\n72 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, one question. \nMs Savabaddy: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Thank you to the hon. Minister \nfor his answer. Can the hon. Minister inform the House whether his Ministry is taking actions \nto assist the squatters and if there is any plan for them to live a better life? Thank you. \nMr Mohamed: Once again, I thank the hon. Member for her question. Is there a plan \nfor them to live a better life? It cannot simply be a plan. It has to be a reality. In order to do \nso, I propose, with regard to the particular issue that the hon. Member has brought up in the \nNational Assembly, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, – and I have already said this to the hon. \nMember – is to organise a meeting in situ, but after we have got a proper survey of the area in \norder to identify ways and means of finding the solution and give them a better life with a \nroof over their heads. This does not only apply to the particular situation in that locality. It \napplies to every single place where there are squatters.  \nMany issues have been brought to my attention. Members of Parliament from \nConstituency No.14 – one of them spoke to me many times ever since the last general \nelections. So, yes, we are confronted with the increased number of squatters. I do not believe \nthat we should make a differentiation between post-July 2015 or pre-July 2015. I believe that \nwe have to accept that we have financial constraints and we also have the difficulty of finding \nproper land to accommodate those squatters. \nI can also add that the hon. Deputy Prime Minister, himself, has brought to my attention \nthe situation of unfortunate squatters on land, commonly known as Carre d’As, in the Black \nRiver District. We are trying to find, under his chairmanship as well, other solutions quickly \nto be able to put them in a better environment and for them to have a roof over their heads \nthat they can call home. So, we are concerned, we are conscious, and we will find the \nsolutions. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nMEDICAL WORKFORCE SHORTAGE – REMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/855",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 855,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/855) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the public hospitals and public \n\n73 \n \nhealthcare institutions, he will state the measures being taken to address the shortage of \nnursing staff and medical practitioners thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in response to the shortage of nursing staff and \nmedical practitioners in public hospitals and health institutions, my Ministry has put in place \na number of short-term, medium-term and long-term measures to ensure that health care \nservices continue to run smoothly and effectively. \nWith regard to nursing staff, several actions have already been taken. On 23 August \n2025, 36 nurses were recruited on sessional basis. These nurses are actively working in \nhelping to support the health system. In addition, a public advertisement was issued on 23 \nSeptember 2025 to hire 90 more sessional nurses. With a view to building a stronger supply \nof future nurses, 300 Trainee Nurses have already been enlisted in the financial year 2025-\n2026 as of 22 September 2025. \nAs part of our sustained efforts, my Ministry further plans to enlist 500 additional \nTrainee Nurses in the financial year 2026-2027 and another 200 Trainee Nurses in the \nfinancial year 2027-2028. This will help to ensure a steady supply of trained nurses in the \nyears to come. \nAs regard medical practitioners, it is to be highlighted that there are presently 120 \ndoctors who proceeded on study leave without pay for postgraduate specialisation. My \nMinistry encourages specialisation in scarcity fields, thereby providing the opportunity for \ndoctors to upgrade their skills and expertise in the medical field, which will eventually \nbenefit our health care services.  \nTo this end, to palliate for the lack of doctors, my Ministry has, on 03 September 2025, \nrecruited 25 Medical and Health Officers/Senior Medical and Health Officers on a yearly \ncontractual basis. My Ministry has also re-advertised for the recruitment of an additional 30 \nmore Medical and Health Officers/Senior Medical and Health Officers on a contractual basis. \nThese doctors will help fill the gap in staffing and reducing the pressure on the current \nworkforce. \nAs a medium-term measure, my Ministry has requested the Public Service Commission \nto recruit 111 additional Medical and Health Officers/Senior Medical and Health Officers. In \nthis respect, I am informed that interviews are presently ongoing at the level of PSC. \n\n74 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to further inform the House that for both medical and \nnursing staff my Ministry is working on a long-term plan. A manpower assessment, in \ncollaboration with the United Nations Development Programme, is currently being carried \nout. The study will help the Ministry to understand how many doctors and nurses will be \nneeded in future with a view to ensuring effective and efficient planning of human resources \nin our healthcare system. \nIn addition, my Ministry is further reviewing the functioning of all our public health \ninstitutions. This includes the current shift system of Medical and Health Officers/Senior \nMedical and Health Officers in the hospitals and the opening hours of mediclinics, area \nhealth centres and community health centres. The aim is to improve human resource \nmanagement and to make services more efficient and accessible to the public at large. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, together, these measures demonstrate my Ministry’s strong \ncommitment to improving staffing levels in the public healthcare system, ensuring that \npatients continue to receive safe and quality health care. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Quirin! \nMr Quirin: M. le président, l’honorable ministre peut-il indiquer à la Chambre s’il \nexiste une disposition permettant d’envisager le recrutement sous contrat de médecins et \nd’infirmiers retraités du secteur public comme du secteur privé, ayant dépassé la limite \nd’âge ? Bien sûr, s’ils sont jugés aptes à travailler. \nMr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in exceptional cases, when the scarcity was felt, \nwe then had recourse to the recruitment of doctors as well as nurses, but it was below 70 \nyears. We were bound to do it as there was a big shortage, and the previous government had \ndone nothing in that field. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay. The hon. First Member for Port-Louis North and \nMontagne Longue! \nOPEN UNIVERSITY OF MAURITIUS – ALLEGED UNFAIRNESS & \nCOMPLAINTS – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/856",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 856,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research",
      "question": "(No. B/856) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research whether, in regard \n\n75 \n \nto Open University of Mauritius (OUM), he will state whether he is in presence of any \ncomplaint against a member of the teaching staff thereof for the use of unacceptable language \nand attitudes and for allegations of unfairness and discrimination towards the students and, if \nso, indicate whether his Ministry has caused an inquiry to be carried out thereinto and/or \nsought and obtained information from the OUM in relation thereto and the actions taken, if \nany.",
      "answer": "Dr. Sukon: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, following posts on social media and articles \npublished in the press, a group of students of the Open University of Mauritius had lodged \ncomplaints against a lecturer. According to the students, the allegations were serious – \n(i) \nthe use of irrelevant and inappropriate comments during a lecture held on 22 \nFebruary 2025 from around 10:30 hrs to 12:30 hrs, and  \n(ii) \nracism and communal bias in the grading of examinations. I am informed that \nthe Open University of Mauritius immediately established an Internal \nCommittee to enquire into these allegations. A preliminary report has been \nsubmitted to my Ministry. The Committee reviewed the nearly 1 hour 47 \nminutes long lecture recordings, saved on the Learning Management System as \nwell as the entire marking process. The Committee has identified potentially \ncompromising elements and has therefore recommended that a thorough \ninvestigation be carried out. \nI am further informed that an independent full-fledged committee will now be \nestablished after legal advice is obtained. My Ministry will exercise direct oversight \nthroughout this process. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, such behaviour, if proven, violates Section \n16 of our Constitution, guaranteeing equality and protection from discrimination, the Open \nUniversity of Mauritius Act, requiring academic integrity. Any conduct undermining equality \ncontradicts the foundational principles upon which our Republic is built.  \nLet me be absolutely clear on three points – \n• \nFirst, there will be no cover up. Every allegation will be investigated thoroughly \nand transparently. The findings would be made available to this House. No one \nwill be shielded. No misconduct will be swept under the carpet. The truth will be \nestablished. \n\n76 \n \n• \nSecond, justice will be served without hesitation. If the allegations are \nsubstantiated, appropriate action will be taken, including suspension or \ntermination where warranted. No qualification, no tenure, no position will protect \nanyone found to have engaged in racism, discrimination or harassment. \n• \nThird, this Government adopts zero tolerance. Any recurrence of such misconduct \nat any tertiary education institution will be dealt with firmly and decisively. We \nwill not allow any act to ignite division, undermine our constitutional values or \ncompromise our education system’s integrity. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to reassure the hon. Member, the students and parents, \nno student will suffer academically as a result of these complaints or the investigation. The \nUniversity has already taken measures to ensure this. Alternative arrangements have been \nmade to ensure that the students have fair assessment, support services and protection from \nretaliation, if ever there is any. All necessary actions will be taken to preserve academic \nintegrity, ensure justice and maintain public confidence.  \nBeyond this specific case, my Ministry will strengthen complaint mechanisms across \nall tertiary education institutions, enhance professional standards, mandatory training on \ncultural sensitivity and anti-discrimination, improve student welfare system and ensure robust \noversight to prevent such incidents. Our students deserve learning environments free from \ndiscrimination, fair assessment, based solely on merit, respect and dignity in all interactions \nand equal treatment regardless of race, religion or any other characteristic. \nThe investigation will be independent, impartial and legally compliant, urgent and \ntransparent. I will update this House upon its completion. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet! \nRODRIGUES – ANIMAL WELFARE ACT – COMPLIANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/857",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 857,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/857) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to the Animal \nWelfare Act, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain and table the list of officers \ndesignated by his Ministry or the Mauritius Society for Animal Welfare to ensure compliance \nthereof in the Island of Rodrigues.",
      "answer": "(Vide reply to PQ B/838) \n\n77 \n \nNLTA – BUS ROUTES 251, 77, 42 & 20C – BUS SERVICES – COMPLAINTS & \nREMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/858",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 858,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/858) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to bus routes 251, 77, 42 and 20C, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information \nas to whether it is in presence of representations in relation to the state of the bus services \nalong same and, if so, indicate the remedial measures being contemplated in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, there are four routes being questioned \nhere in a busy conurbation. So, the reply that has been provided to me is six pages long. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, please circulate it! \nMr Osman Mahomed: I am going to circulate it but I shall… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Briefly you may go through the main points and it will be \ncirculated. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes. I took note of the Facebook page of the hon. Member on \n31 August 2025 and NLTA was requested immediately to conduct an enquiry. There are cases \nwhere several operators are not providing adequate service; this is for sure as you can more \nfully read in the reply. I have to stress the fact that the attention of the Disciplinary \nCommittee chaired by Barrister Aratee Prayag will be done and the consequence of this is \nrevocation of licenses, which can understandably be envisaged, if so required.  \nOn a last note, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, last Friday, Cabinet took note of my Ministry \ngiving instruction to the Attorney General’s Office to draft the Bus Services Bill and this will \nmake the provision for the use of technology to better enable the NLTA to monitor services. \nSo, such problem will be resolved given time. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, one question? \nMr Rookny: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would be grateful if the hon. Minister could \ninform the House when could the inhabitants of Baie du Tombeau and Calebasses start seeing \nimprovement in the situation? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Like I said, the Achilles' heel of the NLTA right now is that it \ndoes not have enough supervising staff on the field. Like I said before, once we have \ntechnology – the Fleet Management System and all – from the office they can monitor \n\n78 \n \nwhether the buses are not compliant with their agreed timetables, on which they are actually \nbeing paid for. So, please, bear with us for some time. My officers told me that the tender for \nthe Fleet Management System can be floated for the consultancy and for the contractor on 15 \nOctober. So, it will take some more time.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle! \nGRAND PORT TO BAMBOUS VIRIEUX & GRAND SABLE TO DEUX FRÈRES – \nCOASTAL ROADS – RESURFACING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/859",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 859,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/859) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the coastal road on the \nstretches of Grand Port to Bambous Virieux and Grand Sable to Deux Frères, respectively, he \nwill state the proposed timeframe for the resurfacing thereof following the recent completion \nof water pipe laying works by the Central Water Authority thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to refer the hon. Member to the \nreplies I made to PQ B/223 on 25 March 2025 and to PQ B/616 on 08 July 2025 wherein I \ninformed the House that the B28 Road had been severely damaged further to the pipe laying \nworks being carried out by the Central Water Authority. I also informed the House that the \n13.1 km pipeline renewal project was divided into two phases – \n• \nPhase 1: from Anse Jonchée to Bambous Virieux to Petit Sable, covering a \ndistance of 6.4 km, and \n• \nPhase 2: from Ferney to Anse Jonchée, covering a distance of 6.7 km. \nThe scope of the works includes the replacement of old ductile iron and reinstatement \nworks which the CWA carries in two stages namely – \n(i) Temporary reinstatement undertaken by the contractor carrying out the pipe \nlaying works which consist of back filing and applying a 30 mm layer of \nasphaltic concrete along the trenches, and \n(ii) permanent reinstatement to be undertaken by a separate Grade A contractor, \nfollowing a bidding exercise. This involves asphalting the damaged road to a \nthickness of 50 mm. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am now informed by the Ministry of Energy and Public \nUtilities that the CWA has completed the renewal of the distribution network in August 2025 \n\n79 \n \nand a separate contract for the permanent road reinstatement works has been prepared for \nboth phases. The bidding exercise was launched on 15 July 2025 and the CWA Board \napproved the award of the contract on 02 October 2025 to Transinvest Construction Ltd.  \nThe estimated cost for the permanent road reinstatement works from Ferney to Petit \nSable which includes the stretch from Vieux Grand Port to Bambous Virieux is to the tune of \nRs82 million which has been catered under the current financial year. The tentative start of \nwork is scheduled for the first week of November 2025 with completion expected by \nFebruary 2026.  \nAs regards the stretch of road from Grand Sable to Deux Frères, I am informed by the \nRDA that pipe laying work is yet to be started. As such the RDA is undertaking patching \nworks thereat. I am further informed that the RDA has not yet issued the wayleave for the \nexcavation works along this stretch and same will be issued only after completion of the \nresurfacing works from Ferney to Petit Sable. \nMr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to highlight that the RDA has raised \nconcerns over the CWA’s failure to comply with the conditions of wayleave namely at \nL’Escalier, Chemin Grenier, St-Julien d’Hotman and Hermitage where no proper temporary \nreinstatement works were carried out despite several notices sent. \nAccording to the RDA, the practice of awarding separate contracts for pipelaying and \npermanent road reinstatement results in significant delays, adversely affecting road users due \nto insufficient temporary restoration. To address this, the RDA is proposing to have a \nMemorandum of Understanding with the CWA whereby the RDA will undertake the \npermanent reinstatement works once pipelaying is fully completely and commissioned. The \nMoU will clearly define the respective responsibilities of both parties including payment \narrangements. \nA meeting is scheduled today with the Ministry of Energy and Public Utilities, CWA \nand RDA to discuss the draft MoU.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka.  \nNOUVELLE DECOUVERTE – REGULAR WATER SUPPLY – MEASURES \nENVISAGED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/860",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 860,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/860) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to Nouvelle Découverte, \n\n80 \n \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as \nto the measures taken to ensure regular and sufficient water supply to residents thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: M. le président, avec votre permission, je répondrai ensemble aux \nquestions B/860 et B/896 car elles portent sur la même question.  \nM. le président, je suis informé par la Central Water Authority que la haute Nouvelle \nDécouverte, et ses régions environnantes sont alimentées principalement par le réservoir \nd’Alma et le réservoir d’Alma île.  \nLa principale source d’eau provient de la station de traitement des eaux de La Marie et \nest complétée par deux forages et trois filtres à pression, les CFP. Les horaires d’alimentation \ndans ces localités sont intermittents. Auparavant, ils étaient biquotidiens de quatre heures à \nhuit heures et de 16 heures à 20 heures, avec une pression réduite. Suite aux plaintes des \nconsommateurs, une étude hydraulique a été menée par la Central Water Authority.  \nLe programme d’alimentation a ensuite été optimisé pour une fois par semaine soit \nd’une heure à huit heures pour Ripailles et la partie haute de Nouvelle Découverte, de 13 \nheures à 20 heures pour partie basse de Nouvelle Découverte avec une pression adéquate.  \nDe plus, la CWA a renouvelé environs 1.6 km des tuyaux à Nouvelle Découverte \ncouvrant Rousette Road, Shivala Road, Jokhoo Road l’année dernière, améliorant ainsi le \nservice pour environ 200 abonnés.  \nM. le président, je tiens à ajouter qu’un nouveau réservoir de service de 3000 m3 à \nAlma est actuellement en cours de mise en service et devrait être opérationnel à compter de la \nfin d’octobre de cette année-ci, donc dans quelques jours. Il est prévu que les heures \nd’approvisionnement pourront ensuite être révisées.  \nM. le président, concernant le projet du nouveau forage, je suis informé que dans le \ncadre du programme national de mobilisation des eaux souterraines en cours, la Water \nResources Commission de mon ministère réalise des levés géophysiques pour le développent \nde 20 nouveaux forages sur l’île, notamment dans les régions avoisinantes de Dagotière, \nL’Espérance, Quartier Militaire et Alma.  \nL’appel d’offre pur ces forages sur toute l’île devrait être lancé ce mois-ci.   \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Ms Thannoo.  \nDr. Ms Thannoo: Is the hon. Minister aware of the poor quality of pipe laying that was \ndone at Shivala Road and the lack of adequate pipes for the upper part of Nouvelle \n\n81 \n \nDécouverte? I am talking about the low quality of the pipelaying that was done in Shivala \nRoad. \nMr Assirvaden: Je n’ai pas compris. \nDr. Ms Thannoo: Residents have complained that the pipelaying at Shivala Road was \nof low quality and we have one area of Nouvelle Découverte where the pipes have not \nactually been laid by the CWA. Thank you.  \nMr Assirvaden: Je voudrais dire à l’honorable membre que nous revoyons toute \nl’ensemble de la circonscription en ce qui concerne le Pipe Replacement Programme.  \nUn nouveau plan va sortir incessamment. Nous attendons de finaliser avec la partie \nindienne parce que nous avons reçu R 2.7 milliards du gouvernement indien pour un nouveau \nprogramme de Pipe Replacement Programme. Je peux assurer l’honorable membre et les \nautres membres de la circonscription que leurs demandes seront prises en compte dans ce \nnouveau plan pour la circonscription.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay. Hon. Venkatasami, do you have a supplementary \nquestion or your question has been answered? \nOkay. Thank you.  \nHon. First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East. \nMONTAGNE BLANCHE – MULTIPURPOSE COMPLEX ONE-STOP SHOP – \nCONSTRUCTION WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/861",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 861,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/861) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the construction of the \nMultipurpose Complex-One Stop Shop at Montagne Blanche, he will state the start and \ncompletion dates thereof, indicating the sum paid to the contractor as at to date and reasons \nfor the delay thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Multipurpose Complex at Montagne \nBlanche was designed as a one-stop shop to bring key public services closer to the \ncommunity. The project valued at Rs30 million was scheduled to start on 29 January 2021 \nand was initially expected to be completed within eight months, that is, 240 days. The facility \nconsists of a two-level building with a total floor area of 1600 m2 including parking facilities \nand was conceived to serve multiple functions – \n\n82 \n \n• First, a reception hall with a centralised queuing system and a common waiting \narea for the public; \n•  Second, multipurpose hall with an accommodation capacity of 500 people, and  \n• Third, flexible offices spaces to host various public service providers.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the project was executed in phases under a multi-functional \nteam. It was divided into five main components – \n1) \nSupply of labour for the construction of the building up to a grey level stage; \n2) \nSupply of materials for the grey level structure; \n3) \ndemolition of the old Village Hall; \n4) \nfixing of aluminium openings in the new building, and  \n5) \nlaying of tiles.  \nTo date, Rs24,769,000 has been disbursed out of the approved Rs30 million budget.  \nI am tabling a detailed expenditure for each component and several factors that \ncontributed to the delay in completing the Multipurpose Hall Complex. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it was only after my Ministry intervened and drew the \nattention the of Council to treat all projects equitably that the Council took decisive steps to \naccelerate progress at Montagne Blanche Multipurpose Complex. \nI am pleased to inform the House that the building structure has been completed up to \ngrey level. Tiles work and the installation of aluminium opening have also been finalised. \nThe project has now moved into the second phase which covers interior works, plumbing, \nelectrical, networking installation, false ceilings, partitions, installation and commissioning of \na lift system and the air conditioning system. Exterior works – we have waterproofing, \npainting, installation of Inox handrail, outdoor gym facilities, landscape, upgrading of \nboundary walls and gates, tarring of the parking yard and access roads.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry is closely monitoring progress to ensure that the \nremaining works are completed without further delay so that the people of Montagne Blanche \nand the surrounding communities can benefit from this much needed facility at the earliest \npossible time.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet.  \n\n83 \n \n“LE HAMEAU”, BEAU PLAN – SMART CITY PROJECT – ENVIRONMENT \nIMPACT ASSESSMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/862",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 862,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/862) \nMr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the development known as \n“Le Hameau” at Beau Plan, he will state whether – \n(a) \nthe promoters thereof were required to obtain an Environment Impact Assessment \n(EIA) licence in respect thereof and, if not, why not and  \n(b)  his Ministry –  \n (i)  was informed that same is marketed and sold as part of a larger smart city \nproject, and  \n(ii)  is informed that the operation of a crane by Terra, co-promoter thereof, is \ncausing noise pollution detrimental to residents of the vicinity thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this is indeed a very interesting matter. I am \ninformed that the Morcellement Le Hameau because it is in fact a Morcellement, at least in \nname, was developed prior to August 2018 whereby a Morcellement permit was not required \nfor bail à construction at that particular time.  \nNow, later on, the Morcellement Act was amended through the Finance (Miscellaneous \nProvisions) Act of 2018 in order to address this. So, the amendment came afterwards whereas \nthe development happened before the amendment.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the House may wish to be informed that according to the then \nEnvironment Protection Act 2022, le Hameau Project was not a schedule undertaking \nrequiring an Environment Impact Assessment licence. Consequently, no Environment Impact \nAssessment licence was issued for the said development and I say again because the law, as it \nstood then, did not make it a precondition.   \nAs regard to part (b) (i) of the question, I am also informed that Le Hameau Residential \nProject forms part of the Smart City Project in respect of which a Smart City Certificate was \nissued on 09 November 2018.  \nNow, as regards part (b) (ii), I am further informed that following a complaint regarding \nnoise disturbance emanating from the operations of the ex-Beau Plan Sugar Factory, namely \nthe elevators and the weigh bridge, the then Ministry of Health – that was before the elections \n\n84 \n \nof 2024 – carried out a noise survey and concluded that noise survey was within established \nrange. But I was not communicated with a report of that survey that was allegedly carried out. \nHowever, I have also been informed that there was a survey that was carried out by a \nprivate party around the same time and that survey says exactly the contrary of what the \nMinistry of Health and Wellness said. The Ministry of Health and Wellness said, ‘In the \nsurvey we carried out, there is no noise above the permissible level of 60 decibels,’ whereas \nthe survey carried out by the private consultant shows that over a week or more, the noise \nindeed goes almost to 80 decibels. \nSo, in the circumstances, I have understood, based on all the information that has been \ncommunicated to me, that the relevant Ministries decided not to do anything following the \ncomplaints precisely because they based themselves on the fact that allegedly, the noise was \nwithin the permissible level, without me having ever been communicated that report. \nI am also aware that this development was, in fact, marketed as a morcellement. This is \nthe information that I have. So, what I propose to do, just like I did earlier on for other hon. \nMembers pertaining to land issues, since this is a matter that does bring about some confusion \nwith conflicting reports and it concerns the value of land and it concerns the health of citizens \nliving in the noisy environment, I propose to call the promoters as there are certain issues \npertaining to the Morcellement Act that seems to have been put aside. I will ask my \ncolleagues, the hon. Minister of Health and the hon. Minister of Environment, to join me to \ntry to address this particular issue about the noise and to bring rectifications that are required. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka! \nTORRENTIAL RAIN & FLOODS SEASON – WORKERS’ RIGHTS ACT \nAMENDMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/863",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 863,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/863) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to torrential rain and \nclimatic disasters, he will state if consideration will be given for a proposed amendment to \nthe relevant provision of the Workers’ Rights Act to be introduced in the Assembly aiming at \nensuring that employees of both the private and public sectors be protected on a non-\ndiscriminatory basis in times thereof and, if so, when, keeping in view the forthcoming \ntorrential rain and flood season in Mauritius. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Are you stepping in for the Ministry of Labour? \n\n85",
      "answer": "The Minister of Housing and Lands (Mr S. Mohamed): Yes, I am stepping in, Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir. With your permission, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I shall reply to this \nquestion.  \nI am informed that this matter is already being given due consideration. Section 15 and \n16 of the National Disaster Risk Reduction Management Act 2016 make provision for a \nNational Crisis Committee to be chaired by the Secretary to Cabinet and Head of the Civil \nService in the event of disasters.  \nNotwithstanding any other enactment in situations of torrential rain and climatic \ndisasters, the National Crisis Committee may, to safeguard the life of any person, issue after \nconsultation with the hon. Prime Minister an order directing any person to remain indoors as \nlong as it is unsafe to venture outside. Such order when issued applies for the whole \npopulation, except for those engaged in emergency and essential services.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, currently, the public sector and the private sector each have \ntheir respective protocols to deal with heavy rain and torrential rain situations.  \nThese protocols are aligned with section 16 and 17 of the relevant legislation while \nrecognising the diverse nature and specificities of the public and private sectors. The protocol \nfor heavy torrential rain and tropical storms or cyclones for the public sector serves as \nguidelines for ministries, departments and public sector organisation in times of heavy rain, \nlocalised heavy rain, torrential rain, cyclone warnings in force in the Republic of Mauritius. \nIt provides practical guidance on work arrangements in such cases with a view to \nensuring the safety of employees as well as continuity of service delivery. Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir, allow me to refer to the Workers Rights Act 2019 which is of relevance. Section \n32 of the Act which deals with the payment of remuneration in other specific circumstances \nprovides amongst others that – \n“(1A) Where, during a period of extreme weather conditions, including, but not limited \nto heavy or torrential rainfall [and it goes on to explain at subparagraph one and two \nwhich is] an order is issued by the National Crisis Committee under section 16 \nrequiring any person to remain indoors, or a state of disaster is declared and any \ndirection for the purpose of assisting and protecting the public is issued under section \n37 of the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act – \n(a) an employer shall not require a worker to report to work, or to continue to work, \nwhere he is exposed to the weather conditions, as the case may be.” \n\n86 \n \nI shall not be that long, but allow me to add, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that during the \nAssises du travail et de l’emploi organised from 23 to 25 September 2025 by the Ministry of \nLabour and Industrial Relations, social partners, including representatives of workers and \nemployees agreed that the same regime should apply for the release of workers both in the \nprivate sector and the public sector in situation of torrential rain, and that there should be no \ndisparity on this issue insofar as personal safety, security and threat to life are concerned. \nI understand that with a view to addressing the perception of continued discrimination \nbetween the public and private sectors when the country is facing torrential and climatic \ndisasters, the Prime Minister’s Office together with the National Disaster Risk Reduction \nManagement Council, the Mauritius Meteorological Services and other key stakeholders are \nworking closely with the private sector for the development and finalisation of a combined \nnational protocol for heavy and torrential rainfall, where safety of the population remains \ncentral while ensuring continuity in emergency and essential services. \nOnce there is finalisation of the national protocol for heavy and torrential rainfall, \nnecessary amendments will be brought to the Worker’s Rights Act 2019 as may be required, \nwith a view to ensuring that employees of both the private and public sectors are protected on \na non-discriminatory basis. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES – MOTOR VEHICLE EXAMINATION CENTRES – PROTOCOLS & \nOPERATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/864",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 864,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/864) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nLand Transport whether, in regard to Motor Vehicle Examinations, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information as to the – \n(a) \nprotocols applicable in case of discrepancies found in the course thereof, and \n(b) \nnumber of centres thereof operating in Rodrigues, indicating the – \n(i) \nnumber of officers attached thereto \n(ii) \nnumber and categories of vehicles examined over the past three financial \nyears, and \n(iii) \nmeasures envisaged, if any, for the enhancement of the services thereat. \n\n87",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (a), I am informed by \nthe NLTA that the protocols applicable in case of discrepancies found in the course of \nexamination of motor vehicles in Rodrigues are covered in five points. They are quite \nlengthy. I am going to table them. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. \nMr Osman Mahomed: As regards part (b) of the question, there is currently one \nvehicle examination centre in Rodrigues located within the premises of the mechanical \nworkshop of the Commission of Infrastructure in Port Mathurin. This centre is manned by \none vehicle examiner of the NLTA posted to Rodrigues on tour of one year service. \n I had, in fact, the opportunity to personally visit the examination centre during my \nofficial mission to Rodrigues from 12 to 14 August 2025. I would like to emphasise that I was \ntaken aback by the flimsy manner in which vehicles are examined on the island. The \nexamination actually consists of a mere visual inspection of the vehicles, which is definitely \nnot adequate to determine whether they are roadworthy or not. \nFurthermore, I observed that the examination pit belonging to the mechanical \nworkshop, which is supposed to be used for examination of under carriage of old vehicles, \ncannot be acceded by vehicles due to its height above ground level. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I \nhave also personally observed that overall, the process for obtaining roadworthiness \ncertificates for motor vehicles in Rodrigues is quite cumbersome. \nIn fact, vehicle owners have to call at the NLTA office at Baie Lascar for the payment \nof the fitness test fee according to their vehicle category. \nThereafter, the vehicle has to call at the vehicle examination centre in Port Mathurin. \nThere, the vehicle is visually inspected by the Vehicle Examiner and in the event of a \nfavourable vehicle examination report is issued, the vehicle owner vehicle has to call back to \nNLTA office in Baie Lascar to collect the certificate of fitness – so, quite cumbersome. I had \nraised my concern with the Chief Commissioner of Rodrigues during a courtesy meeting I \nhad with him. In a bid to align with the procedures in place in mainland in Mauritius for \nvehicle examination, I had proposed that an Expression of Interest to be launched by the \nNLTA for authorising vehicle examination stations currently operating in Mauritius to extend \ntheir services to Rodrigues. \n\n88 \n \nThe Chief Commissioner of Rodrigues welcomed the proposal and is even willing to \nput at the disposal of the vehicle examination station, a plot of land outside of the centre of \nPort Mathurin for that purpose. \nI am informed that the NLTA has already initiated actions at its end for the \nimplementation of the proposal with the assistance the Chief Commissioner’s Office, of \ncourse. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as an ending note, as regard of part (b)(ii) of the question, I am \ntabling the list outlining the number and categories of vehicles examined over the past 3 \nfinancial years. Thank you. \n The Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES – “LES ASSISES DE L’ÉDUCATION” –CONSULTATIONS, \nOBSERVATIONS & CONCLUSIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/865",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 865,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/865) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues)  \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to “Les Assises de \nl’Éducation”, held in Rodrigues, he will state – \n(a) \nthe key observations and conclusions which resulted from the consultations \nheld, particularly in relation to the concerns and demands expressed by \nstakeholders in Rodrigues, indicating any concrete measure or initiative \nimplemented as at to date, and \n(b) \nwhether there has been any formal engagement, collaboration or follow-up \nmeeting with the Rodrigues Commission for Education, local unions or other \nrelevant bodies in Rodrigues with a view to addressing the issues raised. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Minister, we have got only two minutes to go. Is your \nanswer long? I see you have an iPad. Do you have a hard copy of your reply?",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: No, I have… Let me use the two minutes. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Use the two minutes, then briefly you say what you have but \nnext time come with a hard copy of your answer so that you may file your answer. \nDr. Gungapersad:  I will stay guided. After two minutes, I will stop.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, at the very outset, I would like to congratulate the Education \nCommission of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly for the successful organisation of “Les \nAssises de l’Éducation” on 26 and 27 May 2025 and thank all the stakeholders who \ncontributed to make it successful. \n\n89 \n \nI thank the four MPs who attended same. I thank you for that. Now, I wish to inform \nthe House that the consultations held in Rodrigues in May 2025 brought together a wide \nrange of stakeholders including Rodrigues Commission for Education, educators, unions, \nNGOs, parents and so on. \nDeliberations were structured around 8 thematic areas namely, – \n1. \nThe student behaviour, discipline well-being; \n2. \nCurriculum and pedagogy; \n3. \nTeacher training and capacity building; \n4. \nAssessment and progression; \n5. \nTVET and skills development; \n6. \nTechnology in education; \n7. \nLegal and regulatory framework, and \n8. \nYouth voice. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, notwithstanding the current drafting process of the blueprint, I \nwould like to enumerate some measures which have already been implemented or being \ncurrently implemented in the light of the consultations held – \n1. \nPsychosocial supports have been reinforced through training in emotional \nintelligence for educators; \n2. \nDiscussions are ongoing with MES and MIE to contextualize the curriculum, \nprioritizing agriculture, marine and blue economy subjects; \n3. \n Discussions are being held with MITD to expand TVET course and to increase \nenrolment capacity in Rodrigues; \n4. \nCareer guidance sessions have been intensified to better align student choices \nwith labour market opportunities, and \n5. \n Opportunities for co-curricular activities for Rodrigues have been strengthened \nthrough the foundation programme with the support of the MIE. \nIf you need further information, I will be always volunteer to do so. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Time is over. Hon. Members, the Table have been advised that \nthe following PQs have been withdrawn: B/867, B/870, B/871, B/872, B/873, B/874, B/876, \n\n90 \n \nB/879, B/880, B/881, B/884, B/885, B/887, B/888, B/889, B/890, B/891, B/893, B/894, \nB/895, B/898, and B/897. \n \nMOTION  \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2)  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that all the business on \ntoday’s Order Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) Standing Order 10.  \nMr Mohamed rose and seconded. \n Question put and agreed to. \nPUBLIC BILLS \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Public Service and \nInnovation Bill (No. XXII of 2025) was read a first time. \nSecond Reading \nTHE CIVIL APPEAL BILL \n(NO. XXI OF 2025) \nOrder for Second Reading read. \n(3.54 p.m.) \nThe Attorney General (Mr G.P.C. Glover, SC): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I beg to \nmove that the Civil Appeal Bill No.XX1 of 2025 be read a second time. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this Bill forms part of our ongoing effort to modernise the \njustice system, to make our laws simpler, clearer and more coherent. \nFollowing the Criminal Appeal and Criminal Review Act which streamlined criminal \nprocedures earlier this year, this Bill now does the same for civil cases. The Bill may look \nsmall if one stops at the number of pages it covers, however a closer and more informed look \nat its provisions reveal that this Bill is part of a bigger picture. It is part of the long and \nimportant process of rebuilding the system to make the processes simpler and less \nburdensome. \nWe are still in the throes of addressing all the issues that need to be looked into to \nprovide a better and more efficient system of justice. At present, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the \n\n91 \n \nrules governing civil appeals are dispersed across several statutes, namely the Court of Civil \nAppeal Act, the Courts Act and the District and Intermediate Courts (Civil Jurisdiction) Act \namongst others. Each has developed separately resulting in inconsistencies, overlapping \nprovisions and uncertainty for litigants. The result also been confusion, procedural disputes \nand unnecessary delay. \nThis Bill remedies the situation: it consolidates all civil appeal procedures into one \ncoherent framework replacing outdated enactments and standardising the rules that apply \nwhen an appeal is made. First, to the Court of Civil Appeal from the final decision of the \nSupreme Court in its original jurisdiction or second to the Supreme Court in its appellate \njurisdiction from the final decision of a subordinate court such as District Court, the \nIntermediate Court, the Industrial Court, the Master and Registrar, the Judge in Chambers or \na Statutory Tribunal. Henceforth, all such appeals will follow the same process from start to \nfinish. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me briefly guide the House through the principal provisions \nof this Bill. Clauses 6 and 13 provide for a uniform procedure for the lodging and prosecution \nof appeals. Whichever court the appeals lies to, the Court of Civil Appeal or the Supreme \nCourt, the same steps, time limits and forms will apply. \nClauses 9 and 15 empower both the Court of Civil Appeal and the Supreme Court in its \nappellate jurisdiction to determine questions of law referred to them by subordinate courts. \nThis will allow for timely clarification of legal points that would otherwise create uncertainty \nat lower-levels. \nClauses 18 introduces more realistic time limits for the filing of skeleton arguments and \nsubmissions, appellants will now have to file their written submissions 30 days before the \nhearing rather than 45 days whilst respondents will file theirs 15 days before rather than 30. \nThese adjustments reflect the experience of both practitioners and Judges and will make \nscheduling and deliberations more efficient. \nClauses 19 to 23 harmonise the powers of both appellate courts. Previously, Court of \nCivil Appeal and the Supreme Court did not enjoy the same authority when determining civil \nappeals. A technical anomaly that this Bill now removes. \nClause 3 introduces a simple but important safeguard. Every Court, immediately after \ngiving judgement, must notify each party in writing of their right to appeal. This ensures that \n\n92 \n \naccess to justice is not hindered by a lack of information, especially for litigants without legal \nrepresentation. \nClause 29 provides for consequential amendments to six statutes – \n• \nThe Courts Act; \n• \nThe District and Intermediate Courts (Civil Jurisdiction) Act; \n• \nThe Environment and Land Use Appeal Tribunal Act; \n• \nThe Equal Opportunities Act; \n• \nThe Industrial Court Act, and \n• \nThe Sale of Immovable Property Act. \nThe Court of Civil Appeal and its 1965 rules are repealed entirely, making this Bill the \nsole reference for civil appeals. \nHowever, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I will be proposing amendments at Committee Stage \nto this clause 29 of the Bill, more specifically to amend the Court of Rodrigues Jurisdiction \nAct and the new Revenue Tribunal Act, so as to align their procedures with this new \nlegislation. \nTogether, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, these clauses establish a single, predictable system \nthat applies uniformly across all levels of the judiciary. Civil appeals will henceforth be \nsimpler, quicker and less prone to procedural disputes. This will also reduce the burden on the \nCourts by discouraging points of law being raised on unclear or overlapping provisions. The \npreparation of this Bill, I must stress, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, has benefitted from close \nconsultation between my office, the Chief Justice and the Judges of the Supreme Court. It \nreflects their experience in the daily administration of appeals and their support for the \ncreation of a unified and rational structure. This reform also sits within the wider context of \njudicial and legal reform already underway. \nIn recent months, Parliament has enacted the Revenue Tribunal Act, the Legal Aid and \nLegal Assistance Act and the Criminal Appeal and Review Act. Each of these Bills, now \nenacted, have aimed at simplifying access to justice and restoring coherence to our legal \nframework. This Civil Appeal Bill now furthers this goal for civil matters. The Government is \nworking to implement the various necessary changes for these different statutes just referred \nto, to all, be  proclaimed and enforced as from the 01 January 2026. Again, proposing \nuniformity and clarity for all these changes.  \n\n93 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, codification arises from the need to transform scattered \ninconsistent rules into a single, rational body of law. From the Code Civil des Français of \n1804 to the Field Code in the 19th century of America, codifiers sought not only to compile \nexisting laws but to impose coherence upon them, to replace fragmented statutes and judicial \ncustoms with a systematic and accessible structure. Historically, such efforts emerge when \nlegal systems mature to a point where accumulation breeds confusion. The aim is twofold; \ncompilation by gathering dispersed provisions into one reference text and rationalisation by \nsimplifying, harmonising and removing contradictions.  \nIn modern procedural law, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, codification reflects the same spirit: \nefficiency through clarity. By standardising appeal routes and timelines, a codified regime \nensures equal treatment, predictability and ease of application. Ce n’est donc pas juste pour \nfaire joli, mais plutôt la poursuite d’un idéal issu du siècle des lumières, que la loi soit claire, \nconnue et compréhensible pour tous. \nIn practice, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, these are not abstract measures. They affect real \ncases, real people and real time saved in the delivery of judgements. The ultimate aim is to \nmake the law not only fair in principle but fair and efficient in operation. This is thus a \npractical reform, the product of broad consultation, careful drafting and will obviously \nstrengthen the administration of justice, bring clarity to practitioners and litigants alike and \nreinforce public confidence in our Courts. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I therefore commend this Bill to the House. \nMr Pentiah rose and seconded. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Seeburn! \n(4.03 p.m.) \nMr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle): Thank you, \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir. I rise today not as a humble backbencher but as a firm believer in the \ncontinuing evolution of our justice system. Just a few weeks ago, this Assembly came \ntogether to pass the Criminal Appeal Bill, a decisive piece of legislation that marked a \nwatershed in the rationalisation of our criminal appeal process. It was an act of legislative \ncourage, one that put consistency above complexity and the citizens above bureaucracy and \ntoday, we are called upon to act again, to complete the other half of that equation through this \nCivil Appeal Bill which seeks to consolidate what has too long remained fragmented and \n\n94 \n \nunclear. For years now, civil appeals have been governed by a patchwork of statutes scattered \nacross multiple pieces of legislation, resulting in uncertainty, delay and confusion. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I therefore rise in support of the Civil Appeal Bill that will be \ncited as the Civil Appeal Act 2025, which is a reaffirmation of our rule of law. The Bill comes \nwith a view to bring clarity, certainty and uniformity in this area of the law. The Bill will \nsimplify and standardise the procedures for all appeals in civil matters under one deliberate \nand thoughtful consolidated legislation that will govern all civil appeal cases at all levels of \nour judiciary. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, under the current system, the civil appeals are governed by a \nscattered set of legislations, including – \n• \nthe Court of Civil Appeal Act; \n• \nthe Court of Civil Appeal Rules 1965; \n• \nthe Courts Act; \n• \nthe District and Intermediate Court (Civil Jurisdiction) Act; \n• \nthe Environment and Land Use Appeal Tribunal Act; \n• \nthe Equal Opportunities Act; \n• \nthe Industrial Court, and \n• \nthe Sale of Immovable Property Act. \nThis causes great uncertainty as the Attorney General earlier said. Thus, the Courts are \noperating under different routes of appeal and this has lead the people – especially the \nvulnerable ones – and the lay persons who wish to challenge the decision of the Court of first \ninstance, often confused and disempowered. This lack of uniformity risks undermining the \nvery principles upon which our justice system is built, including fairness, accessibility and \nequal treatment under the law. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this Bill is a transformative step forward of how justice is \nadministered in our country. The Bill unifies the appeal rights of all appeal cases in civil \nmatters that are from the final decision of the Supreme Court in the exercise of its original \nand appellate jurisdiction and also from the final decision of the District Court, Intermediate \nCourt, Industrial Court, the Master and Registrar, the Judge in Chambers or a Statutory \nTribunal. In so doing, the Bill will strengthen legal certainty and will protect the rights of all \nparties involved in civil litigation and civil proceedings. \n\n95 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Bill clearly imposes an obligation on any Court after it \ngives judgement in a civil matter, to immediately notify any party to the case of his right to \nappeal. Part I of the Bill deals with the preliminary matters, including the Short Title, \nInterpretation, Notification of the Right to Appeal. Part II of the Bill outlines the composition, \nthe jurisdiction and the powers of the Court of Civil Appeal and further outlines the \nprocedures, the proceedings and the notice required to resist appeal before the Court of Civil \nAppeal. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, a legal system should not only require a map to navigate; it \nshould be a road clearly sign posted, opened to all who seek redress. Under clause 4 of the \nBill which provides that an appeal before the Supreme Court shall be heard by at least 2 \nJudges, and further provides that the Chief Justice may, upon receipt of an application, direct \nmore than 2 Judges to hear the appeal having regard to the magnitude of the interests at stake \nor the importance or intricacy of the questions of law and the importance of facts involved. \nSection 5 of the Bill provides that the Court of Civil Appeal shall have unlimited \njurisdiction and powers to hear and determine appeals in civil matters against the final \ndecision of the Supreme Court. \nSections 6, 7 and 8 of the Bill deal with the procedures, leave required to appeal and the \nnotice to resist appeal to the Court of Civil Appeal. \nSection 9 of the Bill provides that when a question of law arises at the hearing of any \ncivil matter and where the matter is referred to the Supreme Court upon application by any \nparty, where it is so determined, the Court will adjourn the matter until such question has \nbeen determined by the Supreme Court. \nSection 10 of the Bill provides that the Supreme Court shall state the circumstances in \nwhich such question arose and direct such statement under Section 9 to be entered upon the \nrecord for the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeal. \nSections 11 and 12 of the Bill deal with the composition, jurisdiction and unlimited \npowers of the Supreme Court to hear and determine appeal in civil matters against the final \ndecision of the subordinate court. \nSection 13 of the Bill provides that a person who intends to appeal from the final \ndecision of the Supreme Court shall, within 21 days after the date of the final decision of the \n\n96 \n \nsubordinate court, give a written notice of appeal to the Clerk and shall, after service the \nnotice, lodge the appeal within 14 days with the Registry of the Supreme Court. \nSection 14 of the Bill provides that a party may resist the appeal within 28 days upon \nwhom a notice is served, failing which that party may be deemed to have elected not to resist \nthe appeal. \nSections 15 and 16 of the Bill make provision for the Supreme Court to postpone and \ndetermine any question of law referred by any party while hearing any civil matter by the \nsubordinate courts. \nSections 17 and 18 of the Bill deal with the stay of proceedings, service of skeleton \narguments and submissions on the grounds of appeal. \n  Sections 19 and 20 of the Bill provide the general powers of the Appellate Court on \nthe civil appeal to reverse, amend and alter the decision of the subordinate court or order a \nnew trial before a constituted bench. \nSections 21 and 22 of the Bill provide for the Appellate Court to deal with the issue of \nimmaterial errors and frivolous appeals. Under Section 23, the Appellate Court is empowered \nto make such order as the case may require. \nSection 24 of the Bill provides the general powers of the Appellate Court in \ndetermining the question of law referred by a party within 6 months and for the subordinate \ncourt thereafter to give its final decision within 3 months. \nSections 25 and 26 of the Bill make provisions to deal with the application for the \nextension of time and the costs of appeal. The Bill further makes provision for the Chief \nJustice, under 27 of the Bill, to make such rules as may be necessary. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Section 28 of the Bill makes provision to repeal the Court of \nCivil Appeal Act 1954 and further revokes the Court of Civil Appeal Rules 1965. Section 30 \nof the Bill makes provision for a fair application of the Bill so as not to disrupt the current \nongoing appeal matters. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in summary, this Bill, before us today, consolidates all \nexisting civil appeal provisions into a coherent piece of legislation. It clarifies the grounds \n\n97 \n \nand timelines for civil appeal across all courts and further reinforces judiciary efficiency and \nlegal predictability. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in fact, any person who cannot easily understand their right to \nappeal or when the process to seek redress is unnecessarily complex or inconsistent, it is the \nintegrity of our entire justice system that is called into question. Complexity and \ninconsistency outcome cause delays and uncertainty, not only for the appellants and \nrespondents, but also for the law professionals. It is unacceptable that in matters of such \ngravity, where the rights of our people are at stake, our justice system would tolerate \nambiguity in the process. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Bill ensures that once a final decision has been delivered \nby the Supreme Court or the subordinate court, the parties will have a clearly defined legally \nconsistent pathway for appeal that will ensure confidence and fairness.  \nThe Bill further reinforces the constitutional rights of individuals under Section 10 of \nour Constitution which guarantees a fair trial. \nThe Bill supports the independence of the judiciary by offering a clear and predictable \nframework for civil appeal and further protects the most vulnerable ones. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Bill also reflects our international obligations under human \nrights instruments to which Mauritius is a party, including International Covenant on Civil \nand Political Rights to simplify legislation for fair trials. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to draw the attention of this august Assembly to \nthe inspiring words of the hon. Chief Justice of India, Shri Ramkrishna Gavai, who, recently \nin Mauritius, during the Sir Maurice Rault Memorial Lecture on The Rule of Law in the \nLargest Democracy, and in the presence of a historical gathering of legal professionals and \nhigh officials. He reminded the world that the rule of law is not a mechanical formula, but a \nmoral and ethical compass that upholds equality, dignity and fairness that guides our courts \nand every organ of the State, and further emphasised that in a democracy, law must serve \njustice and every statute must pass the test of fairness and constitutional morality. Hence, the \nBill does that. \n\n98 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the judiciary, as we know, is a cornerstone of our democratic \nsociety. By simplifying civil appeals, we are reducing unnecessary delays, we are alleviating \nthe burden of our courts and we are ensuring that judicial time and resources are focused on \nthe substance of justice. When I voted for the Criminal Appeal Bill a few weeks ago, I did so \nbecause I believe in creating a justice system that speaks one language, not several dialects. It \nwould be inconsistent and irresponsible for us, as lawmakers, to reform one arm of justice \nand neglect the other.  \nToday, this House is being asked not only to pass the legislation, but rather to reshape \nthe very system of justice for our country. We are being asked to bring clarity in an area of \nlaw that is complex and confusing for our system and for our people. We are being asked to \nensure that the pathway to justice is a clear road that is accessible to all, regardless of status, \nage or means.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, before I conclude, I would like to thank the hon. Attorney \nGeneral who, with his team, is leaving no stone unturned to reshape our justice system. We \nare grateful to have his continued contribution to reinforce our rule of law. This will go down \nin the history of Mauritius for many more years to come. By coming forward with this \nprogressive piece of legislation, it will reshape our civil appeal cases, thus increasing public \nconfidence in our institutions.  \nI, therefore, urge all Members of this House to come together in support of this Bill as \ncustodians of justice and servants of the people and deliver a framework that will serve all the \npeople of Mauritius. We are sending a strong message to the people out there, that we believe \nin a justice system that is transparent, fair and equal for all. As the great Mahatma Gandhi \nsays – \n“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” \nLet us vote, not just with our voices, but with our vision for a more just Mauritius. With \nthese words, I commend the Bill to the House. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Attorney General! \n(4.16 p.m.) \n\n99 \n \n Mr Glover: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me close this short, but interesting debate by \nsaying that this Bill is, of course, a necessary piece of the puzzle we are slowly and \npainstakingly building to provide a better and more efficient justice system sooner than later.  \nThe next step will be the amendments to be brought to the Courts Act to simplify and \nstreamline – the procedure for judicial review. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am done. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: You commend the Bill to the House? \nMr Glover: That stands to reason, yes! \nQuestion put and agreed to.  \nBill read a second time and committed. \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(Mr Deputy Speaker in the Chair) \nTHE CIVIL APPEAL BILL \n(NO. XXI OF 2025) \nClauses 1 to 28 ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClause 29 (Consequential amendments) \nMotion made and question proposed: “that the clause stand part of the Bill.” \nMr Glover: Mr Chairperson, I move for the following amendment to clause 29 – \n“in clause 29 –  \n(a) \nby inserting, after subclause (1), the following new subclause –  \n(1A) \nThe Court of Rodrigues Jurisdiction Act is amended by \nrepealing section 11 and replacing it by the following section –  \n11. \nAppeal to Supreme Court \n(1) \nAn appeal to the Supreme Court shall, subject to \nsubsection (2), be governed by the Civil Appeal Act 2025. \n\n100 \n \n(2) \nThe time for prosecuting an appeal before the \nSupreme Court from the final decision of the Magistrate for \nRodrigues shall, notwithstanding the 7-day period specified in \nsection 13(5) of the Civil Appeal Act 2025, be 28 days from the \nday of lodging the appeal in the Registry of the Supreme Court. \n(b) \nby inserting, after subclause (5), the following new subclause –  \n(5A) \nThe Revenue Tribunal Act 2025 is amended by repealing \nsection 11 and replacing it by the following section –  \n11. \nAppeal to Supreme Court \n(1) \nAn aggrieved party who intends to appeal to the \nSupreme Court shall, not later than 21 days after the date of the \nfinal decision of the Tribunal, give written notice of appeal to \nthe Secretary to the Tribunal. \n(2) \nAn appeal under this section shall be prosecuted \nin accordance with the Civil Appeal Act 2025. \n(3) \nNotwithstanding an appeal under this section but \nsubject to subsection (4), any tax to be paid or refunded shall be \npaid or refunded in accordance with the decision of the \nTribunal, as the case may be. \n(4) \nWhere an appeal under this section is lodged \nagainst the determination of the Tribunal relating to a claim \nunder section 28(3F) of the Land (Duties and Taxes) Act, \npayment of the tax due under section 28(4A)(a)(ii) of that Act \nshall be withheld pending final determination of the matter.” \nAmendment agreed to. \nClause 29, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClauses 30 and 31 ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nThe title and enacting clause were agreed to. \nThe Bill, as amended, was agreed to. \nOn the Assembly resuming with Mr Deputy Speaker in the Chair, Mr Deputy Speaker \nreported accordingly. \n\n101 \n \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Civil Appeal Bill (No. XXI of 2025) was read a third \ntime and passed. \nThe Deputy Speaker: I suspend the Sitting for half an hour! \nAt 4.21 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.08 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nSecond Reading \nTHE ATAL BIHARI VAJPAYEE INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC SERVICE \nAND INNOVATION BILL \n(No. XXII of 2025) \nOrder for Second Reading read \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister. \n(5.09 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms (Mr L. Pentiah): \nMadam Speaker, I move that the Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Public Service and \nInnovation Bill (No. XXII of 2025) be read a second time. \nMadam Speaker, …  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, please.  \nMr Pentiah: Madam Speaker, and I quote – \nMadam Speaker: One moment, I missed that.  \nYou are trying to get my attention, right? \nMr Pentiah: Yes.  \nMadam Speaker: But I am all ears but not eyes. \nMr Pentiah: Thank you, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker, I quote – \n“A democratically elected government cannot escape its mandated responsibility to \ngive the lead in building the nation, transforming the society and bettering the lives of \n\n102 \n \nthe people. Neither can anybody demand of that they step back from these \nresponsibilities.” \nMadam Speaker, this was addressed by Nelson Mandela at the National Civil Society \nConference dated 24 April 2001. \nMadam Speaker, this government has a clear vision. This government is committed. \nThis government stands head up to face its responsibilities. In the face of dire circumstances \nand extreme demands, this government stands faithful towards building a strong nation to \nface the challenges of tomorrow and honour its mandated responsibility.   \nFrom day one, when the Government Programme – A Bridge to The Future – was \npresented to the nation, it was in effect, a clear commitment to ensure that Public Officers, \ndelivering public service to the people of our country, are empowered to exercise leadership, \ncompetence, efficiency and professionalism in delivering services to each and every public \nservice user with respect and dignity.  The government is fully aware that the public service \nlies at the heart of economic development, welfare and innovation. In its programme, the \ngovernment has undertaken to put quality service at the very centre of public sector \ntransformation.  \nThe clear object set out is to restore trust and respect in our public sector institutions in \nas much as for the past decade our nation has witnessed severe erosion of values, ethics and \ngood governance principles and practices.  \nMadam Speaker, once again, I quote – \n“Government is committed to bringing the Public Service to new heights of efficiency \nand effectiveness, centred around the evolving needs of our citizens and one which is \nresponsive to societal aspirations of the nation while providing necessary support and \ntraining to its staff.” – Paragraph 68 of the Government Programme of 2025-2029. \nMadam Speaker, I stand before the House today to give effect to the vision of this \ngovernment, the commitment of this government and to the undertakings to valorise each and \nevery Public Officer and ensure that they are equipped with the correct tailor-made training \nand competence to fulfil their duties. \nMadam Speaker, I bring before the House the Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Public \nService and Innovation Bill. This Bill, Madam Speaker, is an answer to 10 years of lethargy; \n10 years of ostrich behaviour of hiding one’s head in the sand and a decade of inaction. This \n\n103 \n \nBill provides the necessary framework, structure and parameter to answer to the demands of \nour public officers. This Bill brings in innovation.   \nMadam Speaker, when resuming my responsibilities, I found this Ministry in a state of \ndespair; to say the least.  \nJust take one example – hundreds of millions of rupees of taxpayers’ money were spent \nover a decade for training at the then Civil Service College and for these hundreds of millions \nof rupees for the last decade, all we had to show was a certificate of attendance given to each \nand every Public Officer who attended training at the then Civil Service College.  A meeting \nwith the person responsible of the Civil Service College revealed that his demands and his \npropositions to develop concrete, substantive training courses remained within the deaf ears \nof the then Minister concerned. \nMadam Speaker, from that point to now, in a matter of months, we have not only \ninaugurated on the 12th of March of this year, a state-of-the-art institution with modern \nfacilities, IT equipped classrooms, an outstanding auditorium as well as leisure and \nrecreational facilities.  We opened the doors of the Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Public \nService and Innovation to our Public Officers. \nMadam Speaker, the fundamental objects of the Bill before the House are enumerated \nin its provisions and they lay unprecedented emphasis on the following – \n1. Continuous professional training of Public Officers for an innovative service to the \npublic; \n2. Promotion of organisational, excellence, ethics and values, transparency and \naccountability in the Public Service; \n3. Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the Public Service through good \ngovernance principles; \n4. Conducting research and development activities in light of the changing \nenvironment of the Public Service so as to promote in forms, and above all \n5. To develop a people-centric Public Service. \nMadam Speaker, we did not rest there. With the cooperation of the staff of the \ninstitution and the Ministry, we have already developed courses to award internationally \nrecognised certificates, diplomas, degrees and post-graduate qualifications in Public Service \n\n104 \n \nAdministration, Finance, Procurement, Human Resource and Occupational Safety and Health \nto name only a few. \nMadam Speaker, we did not even stop there. My Ministry and the staff of the Institute \nhave further worked in close cooperation with International Institutions from different \ncountries to establish linkages and develop MoUs to ensure that the training and capacity \nbuilding courses to be delivered by the Institute, is of high standards and quality. \nThis Bill, before the House today is not only making provisions to set up an institution \nworthy of its name but also to provide the necessary foundation to lead as a centre of \nexcellence, providing Public Service Administrative courses to other countries in our region.   \nMadam Speaker, I am pleased to inform the House that this Government’s vision goes \nbeyond the boundaries of our Nation. As examples – \n• \nThe African Development Bank has been working closely with my Ministry, \nand it is prepared to work in collaboration with the Institute to provide training \nand capacity building in the regions of Africa. \n• \nThe cooperation and support of the People’s Republic of China is noted with \ngratefulness to support us in our endeavour.  \n• \nSo is the help and the willingness of the Government of the Kingdom of Saudi \nArabia and of Egypt to support us in our mission; \n• \nWe welcome the support of the United States and its willingness to share its \nexperience and training resources through the Ambassador in Mauritius. \n• \nMy Ministry is working closely with the UN and the UNDP as well in order to \nfurther develop the Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Public Service and \nInnovation into an international centre of excellence for training and capacity \nbuilding. \n• \nHow can I not mention Bharat? The Government of India did not only support \nour Government to realise a state-of-the-art centre of learning, but the \nGovernment of India is supporting us to ensure that our objective of building a \ncentre of excellence for training and capacity building is realised. \nMadam Speaker, this Bill sets out to provide a comprehensive framework to set up a \ncompetent Board of Directors, the Office of a Vice Chancellor, the Office of a Registrar and \n\n105 \n \nan Academic Council as well as innovative and groundbreaking departments inasmuch as it \nincorporates its own quality and standard monitoring unit and an innovation and research \nlaboratory to develop demand-based policy proposals in the Public Sector. \nMadam Speaker, through this Bill, this Government reiterates its commitment towards \nour people and our public officers serving our people.  This Government reiterates that the \nofficers of the Public Service form the very heart of our economic growth and development. \nIn the very heart of the government, lies the welfare of each and every public officer serving \nour people. \nMadame la présidente, l’adage nous enseigne – \n« Les chiens aboient, la caravane passe. »  \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Enn lisien kinn gagn pis sa. \nMr Pentiah: Le peuple de notre pays, notre patrie… \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Ar zot ki lisien in gagn pis. Ar nou, gagn puce. \n(Interruptions) \nMr Pentiah: Je vous garantis, Madame la présidente, je regardais que vous !  \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Monsieur le ministre ! \nMr Pentiah: Le peuple… \nMadam Speaker: Monsieur le ministre ! \nMr Pentiah: Le peuple de notre pays… \nMadam Speaker: Monsieur le ministre, je ne sais pas comment je dois prendre ce que \nvous dites ! Ce matin, j’ai fait une petite blague sur les chiens, n’est-ce pas ? \nDr. Boolell: Oui, les chiens aboient ! \nMadam Speaker: Vous pensez que maintenant, il faut continuer cette blague, peut-\nêtre ? \nMr Pentiah: Non, au contraire, Madame la présidente ! \n\n106 \n \nMadam Speaker: Allez-y! \nMr Pentiah: Merci.  \nL’adage nous enseigne : les chiens aboient, la caravane passe. \n(Interruptions) \nLe peuple de notre pays, notre patrie, témoigne de la volonté de ce gouvernement de \nredresser le fonctionnement de nos institutions. \nMadame la présidente, il y a eu des gens qui volaient l’argent du peuple et d’autres qui \nvolent au supermarché pour des produits de beauté ! \n(Interruptions) \nMadame la présidente, au fondement même de ce gouvernement, nous faisons preuve \ndu sens des responsabilités envers nos engagements solennels au peuple de notre pays.  Nous \nsommes prêts à travailler dur dans l’unité et parfois même à prendre des décisions qui \npeuvent nous rendre impopulaires, mais on croit fermement en un avenir meilleur pour nos \nenfants. \nMadam Speaker, my Ministry fully appreciates the invaluable contribution of over \n58,000 public officers delivering public service. And this Bill also symbolises the fundaments \nto transform the public sector from a job orientated culture towards a career orientated public \nservice where a public service officer in turn appreciates that he or she can transform the lives \nof people of our country. \nI quote – \n“The role of Public Officer is not only to run the administration but to transform the \nlives of people.” \nThis was said by His Excellency Narendra Modi, the hon. Prime Minister of Bharat.  \nMadam Speaker, I shall move with a few amendments at Committee Stage, which have \nalready been circulated to hon. Members. These proposed amendments, Madam Speaker, in \neffect, align the Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Public Service and Innovation Bill with all \nother institutions of the land. \nMadam Speaker, with this, I commend the Bill to the House. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \n\n107 \n \nMadam Speaker: Monsieur le ministre, il y a des liaisons qui sont dangereuses. Ne \nprenez pas cela mal. On reste dans la même histoire d’amour. Des liaisons dangereuses ! \nThank you. Now, the debate is open.  \nI will call on the hon. Leader of the Opposition. Beware! \n(5.25 p.m.) \nMr G. Lesjongard (The Leader of the Opposition): Si je peux me permettre, \nMadame la présidente, dans un pays où on va demander les poulets de faire enregistrer les \nchiens, il y a de quoi que les chiens aboient ! \nMs Anquetil: Come on! Come on! \nMr Lesjongard: Madam Speaker, allow me, first of all, at the very outset, to express \nmy sincere gratitude to India for making the construction of the Civil Service College \npossible. Also, let me acknowledge that the establishment of the Atal Bihari Vajpayee \nInstitute of Public Service and Innovation is in principle a commendable initiative. \nI shall be brief, Madam Speaker. Mais je vais toucher des points pertinents dans le \nprojet de loi. \nMadam Speaker: Parlez dans le micro. On doit parler dans le micro. \nMr Lesjongard: Madam Speaker, our public service needs continuous professional \ndevelopment, research and innovation, if it is to remain fit for purpose in a fast-changing \nenvironment. I also welcome the provision in the Bill – I did not hear the hon. Minister talk \nabout that – that ensures that every employee of the Civil Service College will be transferred \nto the institute with unbroken service and preserved rights. That is a positive measure which \nsafeguards our workers, Madam Speaker. \nHaving said that, let me say that good intentions do not justify bad structures. This Bill, \nin its current form, sets up a governance framework that is not only flawed, but also wasteful \nand potentially dangerous for the credibility of the Institute. \nMadam Speaker, let me highlight the key areas of concern. Let me get to the first one \nwith regard two posts that is the post of vice-Chancellor and the post of Director General. Et \nje trouve cela inélégant, Madame la présidente, premièrement, d’avoir circulé un \namendement majeur at the last moment and the hon. Minister, in his second reading, did not \nalso elaborate on the creation of this new post, that is, the post of the Registrar of the Institute \nreplacing the post of Director General. \n\n108 \n \nMadam Speaker, the Bill places a vice-Chancellor at the top of the Institute. You will \nagree that this Institute is a newly formed Institute. Let us take for example, Madam Speaker, \nthe University of Technology Mauritius or the Open University of Mauritius, these \nuniversities have been here for a long time with full-time and part-time learners and yet, \nMadam Speaker, they do not have vice-Chancellors in place. \n The vice-Chancellor, Madam Speaker, is reduced, I understand from the Bill, to \npresiding ceremonies, chairing the Academic Council and acting as a figure head. Madam \nSpeaker, the vice-Chancellor will become nothing more than a political appointee, if I may \nuse this sentence – a puppet in the hand of the Minister, while the taxpayer’s money will be \nwasted on maintaining a redundant position. \nMadam Speaker, the second area of concern is with regard to establishment of the \nBoard of Governors which I would, if you will allow me, qualify as cronyism over \nrepresentation. \nMadam Speaker, the Board of Government, as defined in clause 9, is where policy and \nstrategic decisions or directions will be established. And what do we find? A chairperson, \nhandpicked by the hon. Prime Minister, representative of the Ministry of Public Service and \nAdministrative Reforms, Ministry of Education, Finance, ICT, Tertiary Education that is all \nof the government ministries and four persons appointed by the Ministry. I put that question: \nwhy a representative of the Ministry of Public Service and Administrative Reforms when the \nSecretary of Public Service is already there? Where will be the independence, Madam \nSpeaker, of that representative to express himself or herself freely when we know he or she \nworks under the same Secretary of Public Service? \nMadam Speaker, on the Board of Governors, allow me to ask, if I may, the hon. \nMinister, the following – where do we have on this Board the voice of learners? Where is the \nvoice of the academic staffs? And Madam Speaker, where is the voice of the non-academic \nemployees who will keep the Institute running? Where are the representatives of Trade \nUnions? The legitimate representative of public officers as it used to be on the Board of the \nCivil Service College Mauritius. \nHere, Madam Speaker, in the new Institute, they are excluded. How can we talk of \ntraining and capacity building for public officers while silencing their very representatives. \nThe people who will attend the courses, who will benefit or suffer from the policies, who \nhave the pulse of the Public Service, their voices, Madam Speaker, are nowhere to be found \n\n109 \n \non this Board. Instead, the Board is crowded with Ministry representatives, political \nnominees but no space for the Unions, no space for the learners and no space for the staffs of \nthe Institute. \nMadam Speaker, you will again agree that this is a step backward in participation and \ninclusiveness. These are the stakeholders who matter the most yet they are completely \nexcluded in this piece of legislation. To make matters worse, Madam Speaker, the Bill allows \nthe Board to determine its own fees and allowances and, in my opinion, this is a textbook \ncase of conflict of interest. \nHow can a Board decide how much to pay itself with the approval of the same Minister \nwho have appointed them to sit on that Board? This is bad governance plain and simple, \nMadam Speaker. \nAnd my third area of concern is the concentration of power in the hands of the hon. \nMinister. The Bill gives extraordinary powers to the hon. Minister, Madam Speaker, from \nappointing the vice-Chancellor to nominating members of the Board and to approving fees \nand to making regulations. This heavy concentration of power politicises the Institute before \nit has even started. If this is truly meant to be a centre of excellence, then independence, \nprofessionalism and credibility should be at its core, Madam Speaker. I have spoken on the \ngood measure which is about the transfer of the employees. I will not mention that again and \nlet me conclude, Madam Speaker.  \nI believe in strengthening of the Public Service training and innovation but this Bill, as \nit stands, risks creating a bloated structure filled with cronies and political appointees wasting \npublic resources while sidelining, Madam Speaker, I have said that earlier, the very people \nwho will deliver quality training and research. \nMadam Speaker, this is what will give credibility to the Institute. I have mentioned that \nand I repeat it again. A balanced representation at the level of the Board comprising academic \nstaffs, non-academic staffs and at least one representative of the Trade Union. \nThe elimination for the time being of the post of the vice-Chancellor which I believe, \nMadam Speaker, like I said, will give credibility to the Institute. This is why I called upon \nGovernment to review certain clauses of the Bill and bring back a structure that serves the \npublic interest and not partisan interest. \nMadam Speaker, Public Service training must serve the nation not the Minister and this \nBill, Madam Speaker, is in the interests of the Minister.  If Government truly wants \n\n110 \n \ninnovation; it must start with good governance. Without it, this Institute risks becoming not a \ncentre of excellence, but a centre of political patronage. I am done, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Beechook! \n(5.37 p.m.) \nMr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil): Thank you, Madam \nSpeaker. Today I feel very honoured to be able to debate on a Bill that bears the name of a \ntowering political personality, not only political but a writer, a poet, a philosopher of high \ncalibre, late Sri Atal Bihari Vajpayee who has had a huge influence in my life and my \npolitical career. \nMadam Speaker, a strong and trained civil service is the backbone of a functioning \ndemocracy. They are the crucial links between us, democratically elected Members of \nParliament, hon. Ministers, and the people of Mauritius; the taxpayers of Mauritius. From \nImperial China to Egyptian Kingdoms, from ancient Greek and Egyptian civilisations to the \ngigantic colonial British Empire, history has taught us one thing; all these successful \nadministrations ran on a strong civil service.  \nAllow me, Madam Speaker, through you, to pay tribute to our 58,000 or so civil \nservants who run this country on our behalf. However, Madam Speaker, while I was listening \nto the Leader of the Opposition, I found it utterly disgraceful for the Leader of the Opposition \nto come up with arguments and to qualify clauses of this Bill which have a very noble \nobjective, to empower our civil servants, to term them as wasteful and potentially dangerous. \nI leave it to the conclusion of the people of the Republic of Mauritius and the civil servants. \nDoes the Leader of the Opposition, for example, find it wasteful and disgraceful that the aim \nat clause 4(f) of this Bill is to develop a people-centric public service? Because at the end of \nthe day, what matters is that people who pay taxes in this country, get a service that is geared \ntowards them and this is what this Bill does. \nDoes the Leader of the Opposition find it wasteful and potentially dangerous that at \nclause 4(b), this Bill aims at promoting organisational excellence, ethics and values, \ntransparency and accountability in our public service? We understand they do not have the \nculture of having an accountable and transparent administration. Il n’y a qu’à voir la façon \ndont ils ont traité le rapport de l’Audit, où certains administrateurs ont refusé sous \ninstruction des ministres de soumettre des comptes, notamment à la Santé, au directeur de \nl’Audit. Et il ose nous donner des leçons ! \n\n111 \n \nDoes he find it wasteful and potentially dangerous that at Clause 5(2)(b), this Bill, this \ninstitute, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Public Service and Innovation aims at what – \nand I find it very interesting; to comply with internationally accepted norms and standards \nand quality management systems? What can we expect from a Leader of the Opposition \nwhose government’s objective by spending millions of money in the Civil Service College \nwhich at the end of the day delivered what? The hon. Minister of Civil Service has rightly \nsaid so – that it used to deliver certificates of attendance which professionally, in the career of \na civil servant, was not of great use. \nAnother criticism that I find très pale, je veux dire, when he blames the Minister not to \ninclude civil servants on the Board of the Civil Service College. Maybe it is one-sided \nreading because at clause 9(2)(h), it is clearly mentioned that – \n“4 persons, to be appointed by the Minister, at least one of whom shall be an executive \nhead of a local tertiary education institution and another one who shall have wide \nexperience in the field of tertiary education and open and distance learning;” \nThere are four members. What stops the hon. Minister to appoint someone from the Trade \nUnion Organisation? Everyone knows! Hon. Dr. Sukon, the Minister of Tertiary Education, \nhon. Dr. Mahend Gungapersad, Minister of Education know that usually trade unionists, from \nsuch academic organisations, they themselves hail from an academic background. So, what \nstops the hon. Minister? The door is not closed. Le Leader de l’Opposition veut tout \nsimplement faire peur. However, as I said, this Bill is very important. The transformation of \nthis organisation which is the Civil Service College which from a certificate of attendance, \nnow is going to deliver diplomas, degrees and has an academic council. I have seen the \nstructure. It has an academic council which enables this council to tailor-make training \nprogrammes to cater for the market, to cater for the civil service of tomorrow. \nBy talking about innovation, allow me to refresh the mind of the Leader of the \nOpposition that, since the budget speech read by the hon. Prime Minister, Minister of \nFinance, we have introduced AI tools to assist our civil servants in their daily tasks. This is a \nhuge step. I speak under the correction of the hon. Minister of Information Technology, \nCommunication and Innovation that the civil service of tomorrow will be highly dependent \non innovation, on AI tools because we will be dealing with a population which will be totally \nconversant with AI tools, e-mails that we will write to reply to queries for example, CSU \ncomplaints would be e-mails generated by AI tools. So, the flexibility in the structure of the \n\n112 \n \nAtal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Public Service and Innovation Bill will allow this institution \nto cater for the public service of tomorrow. \nMadam Speaker, that is why I say that maybe after independence where we struggled, \nSSR struggled to create a civil service that will lead to the sugar boom, industrial boom and \nlater on to the services boom. This institution will shape the civil service of tomorrow. No \ndoubt about that because it is bound to evolve. Till now today, we cannot say what will be the \njobs of tomorrow, in ten years, what type of jobs, what type of services an economy may \nrequire. Therefore, I wish to commend this Bill and congratulate the hon. Minister for \nshowing so much flexibility so that this organisation can tailor-make training programmes for \nour civil service. \nAt the same time, I wish that the training and the additional qualifications provided by \nthis organisation to be explicitly recognised by the State. For example, the PRB report should \nclearly take into account these trainings and qualifications for salary increments. Promotion \nguidelines within the public service should clearly mention marks, points that candidates \nshould be allocated when they go for these kinds of trainings; be it certificates, diplomas and \ndegrees which will enable them to climb the professional ladder within the civil service. \nMadam Speaker, I believe that this Bill is a huge step towards a transparent and \nmeritocratic public service. \nTo end, Madam Speaker, allow me to quote this very powerful speech by late Shri Atal \nBihari Vajpayee ji, which he delivered on 27 May 1996 in the Lok Sabha. It is the epitome of \nstatesmanship from someone who, on that day, lost a vote of no confidence in Parliament. \nThis is what he said, and I will translate it – \n“Satta ka khel to chalega, sarkare ayengi, jayengi, partiya banegi bigdegi - magar ye \ndesh rehna chahiye. Ye desh ka loktantra amar rehna chahiye.” \nI translate it. The game of power will go on. Governments will come and go. Parties \nwill be made and unmade. But this country should survive. Its democracy should survive.  \nBy coming up with such a bill to empower our civil service, this Government is \nensuring that the civil service of tomorrow shall continue to be the backbone of our \nfunctioning democracy. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \n\n113 \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nDear Minister, hon. Dr. Ramtohul! \n(5.49 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation (Dr. A. Ramtohul): Madam Speaker, today, we are not merely debating a Bill. When I hear the \nLeader of the Opposition saying that this Bill is dangerous because it has training on ethics, \nwe understand that ethics is dangerous for the MSM government. \nMadam Speaker, a person who does not use AI today in his own professional and \npersonal activities will be overtaken by other people. An organisation that does not use AI for \nits activities will be overtaken by other organisations. So will a nation!  \nThis Bill establishes the right path for a transformational journey on which we have \nembarked for our civil service that represents the backbone of any progress that we can make. \nWe are shaping a vision – a vision of a public service that learns, empowers, leads and \ninnovates. In today’s age of AI, it is more than ever important to learn, unlearn and relearn. \nThis Institute provides the channel for learning, unlearning and relearning to take to place. \nThe Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Public Service and Innovation Bill 2025 is not \nabout constructing another institution. It is about constructing a new culture for work – one \nthat is built on integrity, intelligence, innovation, knowledge, and ethics. \nThe Bill symbolises a national belief: that our people – our public officers – are not the \nsubject of the problem of governance. They, actually, are the solution. For years, we have \ninvested in systems, platforms and infrastructure. Through this Bill, Madam Speaker, we \ninvest in the most powerful infrastructure of all – the human brain. \nMadam Speaker, it is profoundly fitting that this institute bears the name of Atal Bihari \nVajpayee – a leader who embodied moral courage, administrative vision and unshakeable \nfaith in people. He once said, and I quote – \n“Empowerment is not about giving people power; it is about reminding them that they \nalready have it [in the form of knowledge].” \nThis is the soul of our Bill. \n\n114 \n \nWe are creating a national institution that empowers every public officer to grow \nintellectually, professionally and ethically. An institute where knowledge meets purpose and \nwhere innovation becomes an act of public service. \nThis Bill before this House establishes, under Clause 3, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee \nInstitute of Public Service and Innovation as a corporate body with degree-awarding powers. \nClause 4 defines its purpose clearly, that is, to – \n“provide continuous professional training and development to public officers for an \ninnovative public service;” \nIt will promote – \n• \nthe use of Artificial Intelligence, for sure; \n• \norganisational excellence, ethics and values; \n• \nresearch and development for reform; \n• \ngood governance, transparency and accountability, and \n• \ncooperation with local and international partners. \nWe are building the nerve centre of a learning State – a State that reflects, adapts and \nconstantly improves itself. In the current matrix in which we are, the matrix of facts, it is \nreally important that we provide our civil servants with the required knowledge and the \nopportunity to learn. This, Madam Speaker, takes us from training to transformation.  \nFor too long, training in the public sector has meant attending courses and only ticking \nboxes, as mentioned earlier by the hon. Minister. This Bill departs from that mindset. The \ninstitute will turn training into transformation and prepare officers, not merely to perform \ntasks, but also to solve problems, to challenge conventions, challenge the status quo and drive \ninnovation. \nEvery programme will be aligned with the real needs of Government – from data \nmanagement to service design, from cybersecurity to AI-driven policymaking. It will be \nintegrated with the Government Information Human Resource system in order to empower \nemployees with a learning path and to follow-up on the progress for same.  \nIn this way, we do not offer training to an employee just because that employee has not \nreceived a training in the past. We offer training because that training will help the employee \n\n115 \n \nmove to the next level and that employee will be able to contribute more effectively. So, the \ngoal is clear: to produce public officers who can emerge as leaders in the digital age, not \nmerely followers. \nMadam Speaker, digital transformation is no longer optional – it is existential. Through \nour Digital Transformation Blueprint 2025-2029, launched in May, my Ministry has laid \nsolid foundations – \n• \nThrough the application which will be called ‘KOREK!’, it will consolidate e-\ngovernment services and digital payments. \n• \nThrough the introduction of AI-powered assistant aimed at responding to citizens \nin English, French and Kreol. \nOur public officers will be called upon to act on those requests made by users on \nthese super-apps. \n• \nThe Citizen Hub and InfoHighway, which is again operated by public officers, to \nenable secure data exchange across Ministries. \n• \nAs we have just started the training on the e-Health Project, we are very happy \nwith the determination with which our public officers are walking the path \ntogether with the hon. Minister of Health and myself. They need further training, \nand this institute would enable that training.  \nSeveral other digital projects in education, social security, land transport, and others \nhave been planned.  \nFor our officers to deliver effectively in that environment, training is needed. We need \nthe right institution to provide the right level of training, which is also measurable. \nTechnology can only go as far as the hands and hearts that use it. This is why this training \nwill bridge the gap between digital infrastructure and digital intelligence. It will ensure that \nevery officer becomes a confident, competent and compassionate digital actor within our \ndigital ecosystem. \nDigitalisation, Madam Speaker, saves time, reduces waste and unlocks value. Just like \nan organisation is formed by information processed and people for effective execution of \nservices, the people need to have the right level of training. \n\n116 \n \nA 2024 UN study shows that countries with advanced digital governance can save up to \n25% in administrative costs, while improving citizen satisfaction by 40%. For Mauritius, this \nmeans that we can do more with less resources.  \nThis institute will play a determining role in upskilling and reskilling in the age of AI. \nThere are a lot of concerns around jobs being displaced. People need to be reskilled and \nupskilled, and this training institution will provide that facility.  \nHonestly, I do not see that as us going a step back. We are taking so many steps \nforward. Yes, we took steps back in the last 10 years, and now, we are having to catch up on \nthat delay, Madam Speaker. \nAI is transforming every dimension of governance, from predictive health analytic to \ndigital finance, from citizen services to policy design, yet AI is only as ethical and effective \nas the people who use it. This is why this new institution will be the one giving training in AI \nto all civil officers and every public officer, whether in finance, health, education or local \nadministration will be able to receive basic to advanced training in effective use of AI. Some \nwill learn how AI works, others will learn what AI can do, of course, but others will also \nlearn what AI should not do or what they should not do with AI. Based on a public-private \npartnership approach, we have established a technical committee that is working on the AI \nstrategy and the leg around human and talent development will be executed in a major chunk \nunder the institution.  \nBehind every innovation, Madam Speaker, there is a story. A mother applying online \nfor child benefits, a farmer using Apps for subsidies, a retiree renewing a passport with a \nsingle click. With these services working seamlessly, citizens feel respected. They feel they \nhave got their dignity back that was once snatched away from them and when they fail, they \nfeel forgotten and that demands an effective public service behind the machines and that \nability to operate effectively behind the machines, again, will be delivered under the roof of \nthis institution. \nDigitalisation, Madam Speaker, must never dehumanise governance. Our aim is not to \nreplace the human touch, but to amplify it. This Institute will train officers to balance \ntechnology with empathy – to understand that every data point represents a person and every \nalgorithm affects a life. A digital State must still have a human soul.  \n\n117 \n \nClause 4(b) calls for the promotion of ethics and transparency and these are not mere \nslogans; they are the soul of governance. Our citizens expect not just efficiency, but honesty \nas well and transparency. This training, the measures that will come out of the dashboards out \nof those systems used to manage the trainings being delivered, will be transparent and they \nwill be fair. \nThe Institute will, therefore, embed modules on digital ethics, cyber-responsibility and \ndata privacy in all its courses, which will be common to every other topic.  \nThe Data Protection Office, CERT-MU and the new AI Unit which is being established \nwill provide institutional synergy to ensure that every civil servant understands not only how \nto collect data, but also how to protect it. Some people say data is the new oil, others say data \nis the new soil or the new gold. This is our wealth and we have to train our people on how to \nprotect it. \nClause 5(g) introduces the Innovation Lab and this will be the creative heart of the \nInstitute, Madam Speaker. This Lab will allow officers to test bold ideas and prototype \nsolutions to national challenges. \nImagine a health officer designing an AI tool to optimise blood distribution or a teacher \nbuilding a mobile App to support literacy for children in creole. And, this represents, Madam \nSpeaker, a partnership of ministries and minds. And we want to empower the people who \nserve, the people who have voted us in.  \nPublic officers are not faceless bureaucrats; they are men and women with passion, \nfamilies and pride. This Institute will give them recognition, purpose and possibility to \ndevelop further. And, I will say to them – ‘your ideas matter. Your growth matters. Your \nservice matters.’ \nClause 20(4)(e) calls for the establishment of a blended learning system at the back of \nthe Internet technology. The Internet, Madam Speaker, is not just a technology, its access to \ninformation, access to knowledge, access to development, access to innovation, a tool for \ninclusivity and this institution relies on the Internet as a backbone for delivery of blended \nlearning to Mauritians, to the whole republic of Mauritius. \nClause 10 mandates good governance and transparency in all operations. This Institute \nwill be held to the same standards; we expect it to teach. \n\n118 \n \nMadam Speaker, this Bill is not only a legal contract between government and officers. \nIt is a moral contract between the State and its people. The results will be monitored because \nwhat we don’t measure, we cannot manage. We will thus be able to measure the number of \nstaff trained. The training sessions delivered, the time saved for transactions and, finally, the \nincrease in citizen satisfaction.  \nLet us imagine, Madam Speaker, a Mauritius where – \n• \nEvery officer is AI-literate; \n• \nEvery citizen accesses services seamlessly; \n• \nEvery policy and decision is backed by data, and \n• \nEvery institution is powered by innovation and guided by ethics. \nMadam Speaker, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Public Service and Innovation is \na bridge between the civil service we inherited and the one we aspire to build.  It will make \nlearning continuous, leadership courageous and governance compassionate. And, I close with \na conviction – \n“A smart nation is not defined by its devices, but by the devotion of its people.” \nThis Institute will nurture that devotion and, in doing so, shape the Mauritius of \ntomorrow. \nMadam Speaker, I wholeheartedly commend and support this Bill. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nHon. Dr. Sukon! \n(6.04 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research (Dr. K. Sukon): Madam \nSpeaker, I rise in support of the Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Public Service and \nInnovation Bill. \nThe Leader of the Opposition – fortunately he left – harped on the nomenclature of \nvice-chancellor. It all depends on the institution; in France, we call it Rector. In certain \n\n119 \n \ninstitutions, Director General, Director, so, it’s just a question of nomenclature what we \nwould like to call it. The important thing is the process. He again talked about political \npatronage, I think he was thinking about MIC but here, in the University, in an Institution like \nthat there are processes. We cannot just give a degree.  \nThe Bill makes it clear that there is an Academic Council and the Academic Council is \nresponsible for coming up with the programmes. The process of the programme is that there \nmust be an Advisory Committee which will happen and in the Advisory Committee, you will \nhave people from the Union, he wanted to have people from the Union. The Advisory \nCommittee will have. He says that the board has too many civil servants but this is a civil \nservice college. Who will we have? It’s a civil service college. We should have civil servants \non the board to advise. So, he talked about this is another institution – wrong.  \nAll institutions awarding degrees will have to abide by the High Education Act. It is the \nlaw. The Quality Assurance Authority will conduct audits. And, on top of it, as the Bill says, \nthey will have to abide by international norms, there is no way out.  \nBut what is important for us to realise is why do we need this institution. We need this \ninstitution because if you look at the PRB Reports, reports after reports, it says that \nunfortunately our civil servants have not been trained. Funds were given but the training did \nnot happen. Reports after reports. That is why we need this institution. We need this \ninstitution because all the international organisation – the FMI, the World Bank Report – they \nhave all mentioned that we need to improve the efficiency of the civil service.  \nToday, first, the public is looking for that. Today, when someone goes home, can do all \nhis banking transactions on their mobile. He or she, expects that, well, I should be able to \nhave a civil service that will help me do that. We can buy the technology, as my colleague \nsaid, and bring it here. We can fill the room with computers and digital gadgets. But if you \ndon’t train the person to use it, if we don’t empower the people to use it, nothing will happen. \nThat is why this Bill is important.  \nSecond, in terms of content delivery, the Civil Service has its own specialities. I take an \nexample – Performance Management. Performance Management taught at a university for the \ngeneral public or private sector is different from Performance Management taught in the \nPublic Service because the set up itself is different. So, in terms of content as well, it will be \ndifferent. \n\n120 \n \nI am very happy because this will help to attract international students here and that is \nour prime aim. Today we heard that even the Mali delegation, without invitation, came to \nlearn from us. So, we would like to have more and more organisations coming to study here \nbut formally and legally of course. There is potential.  \nSo, the Leader of the Opposition also mentioned about whether this is a waste of public \nmoney. I will tell him the real truth. If you look at the PRB Report 2021, Rs113 million were \ndedicated and how much has been used for training? Only 35%.  \nMs Anquetil: How much? Say again! \nDr. Sukon: 35% of it.  \nWhy? Because as my colleague, hon. Beechook said, the Civil Service College was \ngiving certificate of attendance. Not attractive. Two weeks ago, the Cabinet approved the \nMicro-Credential Framework which the new Institute will use. The Micro-Credential now \nwill accredit the new programmes that will allow the person to use and accumulate the credit \ntowards a qualification. So, it becomes attractive. The same model was used by the Singapore \nCivil Service College.  \nIn the 90s when they were set up, they actually partnered with Harvard Kennedy School \nand INSEAD in order to have programmes at the highest level. This is what made Singapore, \nas we all know, a Civil Service which is ranked first in the world because they had the right \npartnership. And here as well, provisions have been made to have solid partners in order to \nhave programmes that allow our civil servants to move around.  \nAnd in his budget speech, the hon. Prime Minister mentioned research – we would like \npolicy decisions to be anchored in research. This was not happening before. We were making \ndecisions very often without doing the research behind. And here, I am very happy to see the \nfocus on research and on the lab. The lab is the most beautiful piece I found in the legislation \nbecause it really gives the opportunity for the civil servant, for the first time, to come and \nexperiment, to come and test his ideas without fear.  \nSo, this Bill has been well crafted and deserves our recommendation, deserves that we \nsupport it and deserves that we have such an institution. \nMadam Speaker, thank you. I commend this Bill to the House. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nYes, hon. Deputy Prime Minister! \n\n121 \n \n(6.12 p.m.) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister : Madam Speaker, we are creating the Atal Bihari \nVajpayee Institute pour le progrès du pays avant tout, pour le progrès de la population avant \ntout. Mais aussi pour le progrès et le welfare, le bien-être des fonctionnaires en générale.  \nAu moment où nous discutons de ce projet de loi, je tiens à remercier les \nfonctionnaires, à les féliciter aussi et leurs souhaiter bonne chance pour le voyage qui \ncommence. Le nouveau voyage, une nouvelle étape plutôt qui commence avec la création de \ncet important institut que nous créons, important pour le progrès du pays avant tout.  \nEt vous me permettrez, sans m’attarder là-dessus, de faire encore une fois remarquer \nqu’il y a deux membres de l’opposition. Le troisième qui est présent n’est pas officiellement \ndans l’opposition mais il est là.  Officiellement, il y a deux membres de l’opposition et ce \npetit mal élevé qui est à côté du Leader de l’opposition, n’est jamais présent quand le Leader \nde l’opposition fait un discours, et la liste des orateurs a été circulée, s’il vous plaît. Il sait que \nle Leader de l’opposition va être seul parce que lui, il brille par son absence.  \nVous m’excuserez mais je m’indigne à chaque fois que je vois cela. Je m’indigne au \nnom de mon pays. Il ne mérite pas d’être là et il le fait bien de ne pas être là d’ailleurs.  \nJe salue la création de cet institut qui va jouer un rôle clé dans le nouvel élan de \ndéveloppement de notre pays. Mais pour ma part, je vais parler, je ne vais pas revenir sur tout \nce qui a été dit et bien dit par les orateurs avant moi. Je vais parler essentiellement d’Atal \nBihari Vajpayee parce qu’il faut bien que nous mesurions la portée de ce que nous faisons. \nQuand nous donnons le nom de ce grand homme d’état à une institution pareille, nous avons \nun devoir de réussir. Nous n’avons pas le droit d’échouer au nom, ne serait-ce qu’au nom de \ncette personnalité. C’est donc sur Shri Vajpayee que je vais parler essentiellement. \nLe 25 décembre de l’année dernière, le 25 décembre de 2024, on a célébré le centième \nanniversaire de la naissance de Shri Vajapyee. Nous sommes légèrement en retard mais il \nn’est jamais trop tard pour saluer ce genre d’être humain. Je le salue au nom du pays et en \nmon nom personnel.  \nMadame la présidente, le 25 décembre 2024, donc nous célébrions le centième \nanniversaire. Et aujourd’hui, nous créons cette institution. Shri Vajpayee a été un des plus \ngrand Premier ministres que l’Inde ait produit depuis 1947 et je dirai aussi que les faits sont \nlà. Shri Vajpayee a été the longest serving member du Parlement indien.  \n\n122 \n \nIl a été élu dix fois. Je m’arrêterai là, je ne parlerai pas d’autres qui ont encore plus \nd’années de service et qui ont été élus plus des fois mais lui, c’était un être extraordinaire, \nMadam Speaker.  \nJe le répète, il était certainement un des plus grand Premier ministres que l’Inde ait \nproduit et l’Inde en a produit depuis 1947 des grands Premier ministres. Cela me touche aussi \nquand je lis et quand j’apprends, quand je me rappelle que Vajpayee avait beaucoup \nd’admiration – il était du BJP – et beaucoup d’estime pour Jawaharlal Nehru. \nUn jour, dans le Lok Sabha, dans le Parlement indien, Nehru, en écoutant – parce que \nc’était aussi un grand orateur –Vajpayee prendre la parole, a prédit qu’il sera one day Prime \nMinister of India.  \nIl y a une phrase qui me touche profondément à chaque fois que je la relis. Quand \nNehru est mort le 27 mai 1964, Vajpayee a fait ses éloges. Il a dit deux choses. Entre autres, il \na dit, d’abord, que Nehru avait été the orchestrator of the impossible and inconceivable. C’est \nvrai que Vajpayee était un grand poète aussi, et ça s’entend quand on lit ce genre d’éloges de \nNehru. Ce qui est admirable aussi, c’est que Vajpayee était du BJP, mais il a fait plus que la \nplupart des premiers ministres de l’Inde pour rapprocher l’Inde et le Pakistan. \nAlors que des guerres éclataient à des intervalles plus ou moins réguliers entre ces deux \ngrands pays, il a fait plus d’efforts que n’importe qui. Jusqu’à organiser un sommet à Agra \navec le président Musharraf, que j’ai connu aussi, pour essayer de rapprocher et de tourner la \npage pour ouvrir une nouvelle page d’amitié entre l’Inde et le Pakistan. \nPeu de gens savent que Vajpayee est venu quatre fois à l’île Maurice. L’honorable \nPremier ministre le sait. Quatre fois ! Le 12 mars 1978, alors qu’il était ministre des Affaires \nétrangères, il nous a fait l’honneur d’être ici à cette occasion. En 1993, la petite île Maurice – \nc’était très beau – a invité Vajpayee en sa capacité de leader de l’opposition. Et il est venu \nchez nous en sa capacité de leader de l’opposition. \nLe 3-4 septembre 1998 – et cela, mon voisin, l’honorable Premier ministre, s’en \nsouvient mieux que moi ! Il était avec Vajpayee en Afrique du Sud –, l’honorable Premier \nministre de l’île Maurice est revenu dans l’avion du Premier ministre de l’Inde en passant par \nl’île Maurice. Troisième visite chez nous ! Et le 13 mars 2000, alors qu’il était à nouveau \nPremier ministre, Shri Vajpayee, quatre fois, il nous a fait l’honneur de nous rendre visite à \nl’île Maurice. C’est pourquoi nous avons tellement raison de donner le nom honorifique de ce \n\n123 \n \ngrand homme, de ce grand Premier ministre à cet institut que nous créons aujourd’hui, \nMadam Speaker. \nJe parle un peu avec émotions de Shri Vajpayee parce que quand j’étais Premier \nministre – je me souviens plus de la date exacte –, je me suis fait un devoir en tant que \nPremier ministre – bien que je fusse Premier ministre pendant quelques années seulement – \nde visiter les cinq pays de peuplement de l’île Maurice. C’est-à-dire, Madagascar, \nMozambique, la France, l’Inde et la Chine. Et l’Inde fut le premier pays où j’ai fait un devoir \nde le visiter en ma capacité de Premier ministre. \nJe ne suis pas le seul ; je connais des Mauriciens et des Mauriciennes qui sont \nprofondément attachés à Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee. C’est pourquoi je conclurais, Madam \nSpeaker, en disant alors que nous sommes en train de créer cette institution, je le répète, nous \navons le devoir d’être à la hauteur de cet homme dont nous vénérons le nom et dont nous \nsaluons son passé.  \nC’est pourquoi, je le répète, bravo à l’honorable ministre concerné et bravo au \ngouvernement pour la création de cette nouvelle institution ! Mais je le répète, nous n’avons \npas droit à l’erreur et nous ne commettrons pas d’erreurs lorsque nous célébrerons à notre \nfaçon la mémoire d’un grand homme d’État et d’un grand Premier ministre de Mother India. \nMerci, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister! \n(6.23 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, at the very outset, let me, again, thank the \nGovernment of India for having so generously gifted us with this state-of-the-art building to \nbe the seat of the Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Public Service and Innovation, which I \nopened when hon. Prime Minister Modi was here. Both the hon. Deputy Prime Minister and I \nhad the privilege to know this Great Son of India. \nShri Atal Bihari Vajpayee epitomised what every leader should aspire to be. He was a \ntowering figure, a man of great vision and culture. Not many people knew he was also a poet, \nbut I noted hon. Beechook said that. He was also a poet. Perhaps that why he was such a great \norator because he understood what rhythm in speech meant. \nMadam Speaker: Interesting! \n\n124 \n \nThe Prime Minister: He had not only a great voice, but a command of language. He \nwas an accomplished and abled parliamentarian, a statesman, a leader of man who devoted \nhis life to public service – a long period, as the hon. Deputy Prime Minister said. He was such \na figure!  \nI remember I met him in his official residence just prior to the elections. Elections \nbeing what they are, he lost that election just afterwards. That was the election where they \nsaid ‘India Shining.’ I saw when I came back that when he lost the election – to give you an \nidea –, hon. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, the first thing he did, he took a lot of flowers, \nhe went to his home and put a garland around his neck. After he had lost the election! Can \nyou imagine this happening here? \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: On ne sait jamais !  \nThe Prime Minister: The hon. Deputy Prime Minister enumerated the dates – he came \nhere four times. I remember in 1978, when he came here as Foreign Minister – You know the \nprotocol that we have with the Civil Service –, Sir Seewoosagur wanted to go and welcome \nhim at the airport. But the protocol told him, ‘It is not right. He is not a Prime Minister. He is \na Foreign Minister. So, the Foreign Minister should go.’ I saw the note in the file. The then \nPrime Minister Sir Seewoosagur said, ‘For me, he is the Great Son of India. I am going to go \nand welcome him. Never mind protocol!’ That is what he did! \nI must say, Madam Speaker, I am very sad not to have been able to pay him my last \nrespect when he passed away as there was an objection to my travelling abroad at the time. \nSo, I did not. But never mind! Hon. Damry knows, hon. Dr. Ms Jeetun knows, those who \ncame with me know, the hon. Foreign Minister knows, every time I go to India, even when I \nhad COVID, I went to his samadhi. Again, when I went to India, I think the young minister, \nhon. Aadil Ameer Meea also knows, we went to his samadhi to pay our respect to that Great \nSon of India.   \nI do hope that those who will be entrusted with the stewardship of this institution will \nensure that it lives up to the reputation of Atal Bihari Vajpayee, as the hon. Deputy Prime \nMinister and hon. Minister Sukon also said, because that institution is named after him. And \nthe setting up of this institute should also be placed in the perspective of the Government’s \naim to have a more performing public sector. It is in our Government Programme of 2025-\n2029. \n\n125 \n \nMadam Speaker, we live in a rapidly changing world. It follows that all our institutions \nshould have the capacity to adapt and to change. Our very success will be tributary to our \ncapacity to lead during a period of perpetual mutation on all fronts. \nQuality of service, as I think many orators said before me, should be at the centre of \npublic sector transformation, ensuring that the needs of all citizens remain our top priority. In \nthis endeavour, Government will also introduce a Public Sector Reform Bill, which will also \npave the way for an open government culture.  \nGovernment’s intention… I am sorry, I should not really refer to him, they are not even \nhere, but they have not understood anything. At least the Leader of Opposition, the other one \nwas not here, he did not understand anything. Government’s intention is to encourage \ninnovative practices and empower public servants to exercise leadership and to address the \nsystemic issues rather than relying on the traditional approach. \nOur aim is to position the Civil Service as a dynamic force for national development \nand long-term success. We used to be! There was a paper in the Modern Law Review of all \nmagazines a long time ago. It compared countries in Africa and it pinpointed two countries: \nBotswana and Mauritius. It said these two countries have been successful because they have \ncivil servants worth their salt. We had managed to achieve that but avec le MSM, tout a \ndégringolé. No meritocracy, no equal opportunity, nothing. \nOur aim is to position the Civil Service as a dynamic force for national development \nand long-term success. Enhancing the Public Service would entail deepening civil servants’ \nknowledge and capacity, strengthening their understanding, empathy for the needs of our \ncitizens and reinforce the values and commitment to excellence. \nMadam Speaker, Mauritius is in dire need of a Civil Service which adapts and which \nproactively plays its main role, that is, driving national progress and nation-building. All \npublic sectors employees should be able to navigate through the complexity that we see, the \nuncertainty, the change that is needed. \nFurthermore, Madam Speaker, Government will introduce a public service facilitation \nsystem, again, to enhance service delivery to the population, reducing the cost of assessing \nservices and eliminating unnecessary inconveniences. Lots of this is happening because \nnothing has been done. In fact, as, I think, hon. Beechook and hon. Sukon said, they were \ngiving certificate of attendance; that is what they were achieving.  \n\n126 \n \nWe want to change all this, Madam Speaker. If we want to create a generation of \nadaptive leaders in the service, it is imperative that we ensure fairness, meritocracy and the \nrecognition of skills. People say we can become like Singapore. We will not become like \nSingapore unless we do these changes. We must recognise meritocracy! We must give equal \nopportunity! We must recognise skills! This is the only way to guarantee a modern and \neffective civil service. That is why I introduced the Equal Opportunity Act. This is why I \nintroduced the Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal. Why? The Civil Service was not happy with \nthis, I must say – the top civil servants, I mean. But there are injustices that happens to civil \nservants. We have seen it; who are not given the chance. And did you see what has \nhappened? Since that, many civil servants have had their promotion reinstituted. It is very \nimportant that they feel that they are part of the system and that we will recognise their ability \nwhen they are working hard and producing results.  \nGovernment is committed to bringing the Public Service to new heights of efficiency. \nAnd let us say it, let this be clear – the hon. Deputy Prime Minister said it also – we have \nsome very able civil servants in this country. \nWe have, through the manipulation of the MSM, some people who are not up to that \nlevel. We must also agree to that, but some are very, very able civil servants. There is no \nreason, therefore, why the Public Service cannot be as efficient and performing as the best in \nthe private sector. Why is it that people go to private clinics and try not to go to hospitals? \nCan you imagine? I know hon. Bachoo doing a lot for this and he is being criticised, never \nmind. \nWe have to do what we have to do to make this country a better country. That is our \npurpose! Can you imagine somebody who is diabetic – I will give an example – he/she is told \nnot to eat anything? In fact, they tell them, I checked, the ‘night before’, when in fact, they \nshould have said ‘after midnight’. So, the person does not eat anything. The diabetic patient \ncomes to the hospital, sits there, goes in a queue, wait for three hours. This is not how you \ntreat diabetics. But if you go to a private clinic, they will tell you not to eat anything after \nmidnight, you come in, they immediately take your blood and check your results. This is \npossible in the Public Service as well but we are not doing it. That is what we have to change. \nI am giving this as an example.  \nDuring recent years, we have witnessed, I must say, severe erosion of values, ethics and \ngood governance. Restoring trust in our Public Sector institutions at large is, therefore, high \n\n127 \n \non this Government’s agenda. This is a sine qua non condition if we want to build a resilient \ncountry and meet the evolving needs of our citizens. We will provide all the necessary \nsupport and training to civil servants. \n I am not sure whether it is Dr.  the hon. Sukon or hon. Beechook who said it. We will \nhave to have people from Harvard, from other places to come and teach them. And there is \nsomething about Mauritians that perhaps people do not realise. They like to learn, they are \nkeen to learn but they are not given the opportunity to learn. There is an attitude. I give you \nan example: I got some veterinary surgeons to come to Mauritius to give lectures and to train. \nWhen I checked, only those who work in the Public Service were invited. I said why? Why \ncan’t you invite the private sector as well? We want them to learn. It should not be restricted \nand many of them were very thankful that we did this.  \nThe Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Public Service will play a critical role in the \nmodernisation of the Public Sector. The need for organisational ability to perform and deliver \nhas assumed a paramount importance for any institution, whether public or private, to meet \nthe prevailing daunting challenges. And it has not dawned upon us yet that the status quo \nrepresents an existential threat for our country. \nThis is why it is very important to analyse on a regular basis the issues and the drivers \nof change in the environment we are operating because this environment is becoming \nincreasingly complex. More than ever, we have to integrate; we have to have a vision to think \nof the country at the institutional level. It is critical.  \nAn important issue which considerably impacts on the thought process and work \nculture in Mauritius is the emotional dynamics of our country, the mindscape of our \npopulation that makes it extremely difficult to undertake fundamental reforms for transition \nfrom an insular mindset to a global mindset. The sooner we learn this, the better for the \ncountry.  \nBasking in the glory of a pseudo economic miracle, coupled with navel-gazing and self-\ncongratulations has lulled us into a dangerous level of complacency and has fostered an \nideology of comfort, relegating reform to rhetoric – just rhetoric – regurgitated during \nworkshops and seminars, same thing. Can we, collectively as a nation, marshal our political, \nintellectual and moral sinews to chart out a coherent, practical framework with specific, \ninnovative strategies for responding to these new challenges and managing these changes in a \ncomplex world? We all agree; we cannot be locked in the 20th century-thinking anymore.  \n\n128 \n \nMinister Dr. Ramtohul just said that some people do not even know what AI is. Would \nyou believe it? They are still in the 20th century. We cannot continue frozen in the model of \nyesterdays. However successful this model was, in this new era it will not take us to the new \nheights that we want to achieve. It can only bring us down.  \nHighly successful countries like Singapore, New Zealand, and Finland owe their \nachievements to institutions with values and systems that inculcate a culture that fosters a \nstrong national cohesion and adaptable and resourceful people that help to lay the foundation \nof a creative society.  \nWe have reached a moment in our development where the basis of our strategy is \nliterally changing overnight. This necessitates an urgent and fundamental course of correction \nand frequent recalibration.  \nLet me quote the former CEO of KPMG, Mr Jon Madonna – \n“Nothing stops an organisation faster than people who believe that the way they worked \nyesterday is the best way to work tomorrow. To succeed, not only do people have to \nchange the way they act, they have got to change the way they think about the past.” \nFrankly, I despair sometimes when I see some civil servants – no fault of theirs – do \nthings this way because this was the way it has always been done in the past. I tell them we \nmust innovate, think out of the box, remove the blinkers, get out of your comfort zone. What \nis important is to get things done efficiently in the shortest possible time and respond to the \nexpectations of the people of this country. The Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Public \nService and Innovation should not and will not be allowed to join those mammoth institutions \nwhich have failed in their missions and have literally become redundant and obsolete. \nMadam Speaker, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Public Service will hopefully \nbecome a centre of excellence, not only for Mauritius but for the region. It should \ncontinuously be committed to designing and developing programmes that support \ncompetency-driven growth within the civil service. It should ensure that they have the ability \nnot only to grow but to thrive.  \nIn this prospect, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Public Service and Innovation will \nalso organise a focused capacity building programme for members of the committee to \nimplement the measures of the Government Programme 2025-2029. The aim is to assure \npolicy coherence and a timely implementation of Government’s vision for a better Mauritius. \n\n129 \n \nTo allow the Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute to attain a reputation as a pole of excellence, \nit is extremely important for it to have the linkages with well-known institutions in the world \nas Minister Sukon just said.  \nDuring my recent State visit to India, officials of my delegation have raised the \npossibility of linkages and arrangements with the famous Indian Institute of Management in \nHyderabad where many of our former top civil servants were trained. We have also talked to \ninstitutions in other countries like France, l’Ecole Nationale d’Administration and the \nSingapore Civil Service. We also talked to some people in the UK.  \nAs we look to the future, Madam Speaker, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Public \nService and Innovation Bill is one of the bold steps of Government to restore the trust and \ndignity of our public service. I have said it many times – a country’s success depends on the \nquality of its institutions. That is what makes a country progress. It is a commitment of \ntransforming and empowering our public servants, ensuring that they are ready to embrace \nthe future and that they serve with proper attitude, integrity and dedication. And I want to \nreassure our civil servants that Government will help them to achieve these new heights. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you so much. Yes, hon. Minister, your winding-up speech, \nplease! \n(6.45 p.m.) \nMr Pentiah: Madam Speaker, first and foremost, I wish to take this opportunity to \nthank all the hon. Members of Parliament who have intervened and provided their valuable \ncontribution. It is an honour indeed to hear the contributions of the hon. Prime Minister \nhimself and the hon. Deputy Prime Minister on this innovative step towards a better public \nservice. Hon. Beechook, may I please reassure you that everything you said has been noted \nby the officers of my Ministry present and actions will be taken onboard.  \nMadam Speaker, the contributions of the Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and \nResearch, Dr. Sukon, comes also from his experience in the field and whatever he has said, \nhis suggestions will be noted. Last but not least, my good friend on my left, hon. Dr. \nRamtohul, Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation. \nMadam Speaker, we cannot go forward without his contributions, his knowledge and \nexperience. Hence, speaking of the Board as the hon. Leader of the Opposition mentioned, \n\n130 \n \nthere is a reason why in the Board itself – and it is important for me to inform the House – \nthat there is a representative of the Minister of Education because Human Resource \nDevelopment, HRDC is with him and it is to the competence, the volition of this Minister to \nname the right person on the Board to the right job. There is a reason why a representative of \nthe Minister of Tertiary Education is on the Board because his contribution is invaluable. \nThere is a reason, Madam Speaker, why the Minister of Information Technology, \nCommunication and Innovation is represented on the Board because without the \ncontributions of these Ministers, we cannot move forward in a positive direction. The more \nso, we mentioned a representative of the Minister of Finance. Well, it goes without saying, \nthe motto of our Budget 2025-2026 is performance-based budget. We want to be accountable \nfrom day one: what we are spending and for what we are spending the money of the people. \nMadam Speaker, speaking of representatives of the teaching staff and speaking of \nrepresentatives of the trade unions, as rightly pointed out by hon. Beechook, there is the \npossibility because the Bill has made provisions for this.  \nBesides what the hon. Deputy Prime Minister has said, the continuous absence of the \nOpposition, what is sad though is each and every time, Madam Speaker – there must be a \nway to stop this – the hon. Leader of the Opposition appears to be reading only part of the \nprovisions of the laws before this House. He misleads the House and misinterprets the lines \nand the provisions of the Bills, and that is improper. Very often, we hear in this House the \nterm ‘a seasoned politician’. Well, this is not the behaviour or the act of a seasoned politician \nbecause prior to being a seasoned politician, we have to be a patriot, thinking about the \nbenefits and welfare of this country and the people of this country. He just says whatever \ncomes to his mind. Each and every time, he addresses parts of the provisions of the Bill and \ndisappears without hearing the reply or explanation given in this House. \nMr Jhummun: Malelve! \nMr Pentiah: That is really not commendable. Madam Speaker, I now go back to my \nsumming up. \nMadame la présidente, nous avons la certitude que nous avons la confiance du peuple. \nEnsemble, nous allons continuer à œuvrer pour le bien être du pays. \nI quote – \n\n131 \n \n“The Civil Service plays a crucial role in the implementation of Government policies. It \nwill be equipped to support the building of a solid foundation for a new economy and \nthe new social order and to effectively serve all citizens.”  \nThis is the speech of our Prime Minister in the Budget 2025-2026 at paragraph 208. \nMadam Speaker, the provisions of this Bill before the House set out the very foundation \ntowards – \n• \nan efficient; \n• \na transparent; \n• \nan accountable; \n• \na resilient; \n• \nan agile, and above all \n• \na people-centric public service. \nIn the words of the Father of our Nation, Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam, I quote – \n“We shall all work together, for the country belongs to all of us, and let us contribute \nour share in the building of a strong, free and happy Mauritius. \nIt is the life of the ordinary men and women of this country who form the backbone, \nand who, after all represent what is the prosperity of the island, that matters.” \nMadam Speaker, along the same vision and line of thinking, Bharat Ratna Atal Bihari \nVajpayee’s life itself was a lesson in integrity, humility and dedication to the people. \nVajpayee Ji’s vision teaches us that the greatness of a nation depends on the quality of its \ncitizens and its public institutions. His vision inspires and guides us that governance is not \nabout authority, but about responsibility. He teaches us that governance is not about power, \nbut about empowerment. Inspired by his vision, we would create a generation of public \nofficers that will contribute to the fulfilment of the vision of the Father of our own Nation. \nMadam Speaker, it is with these values, principles and vision that this Government sets \nout towards administrative reforms and a new innovative public service, which I have the \npleasure and honour to contribute with a dedicated and committed team at my Ministry.   \nMadam Speaker, it is through properly structured demand-orientated and correct \nframework with a modern-conducive environment that each and every provision of this Bill \n\n132 \n \nhas been developed while carefully listening to the legitimate expectations of public service \nusers. My Ministry puts forward this Bill as the building block towards the construction of an \nedifice that each and every public officer will be duly valued and respected for the \ncontributions towards building trust and confidence in the public service we deliver. \nAt the end, Madam Speaker – \n“The success of any country lies in the strength and credibility of its institutions. As \nsuch, it is vital that the public service continually renews itself to ensure high quality \npublic services.”  \nHon. Dr. Navin Ramgoolam, the Prime Minister of this country. It is his words. \nWith these words, Madam Speaker, I commend the Bill to the House. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nBill read a second time and committed. \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \nTHE ATAL BIHARI VAJPAYEE INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC SERVICE AND \nINNOVATION BILL  \n(NO. XXII OF 2025) \n(Madam Speaker in the Chair) \nClause 1 ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClause 2 (Interpretation) \nMotion made and question proposed: “that the clause stand part of the Bill.” \nMr Pentiah: Madam Chairperson, I move for the following amendments to clause 2 – \n“in clause 2 – \n(i) \nby deleting the definition “Director-General” and replacing it by the \nfollowing definition – \n“Director-General” means the Director-General of the Civil Service \nCollege, Mauritius; \n\n133 \n \n(ii) \nby inserting, in the appropriate alphabetical order, the following new \ndefinition – \n“Registrar” means the Registrar of the Institute, appointed under \nsection 20;” \nAmendment agreed to. \nClause 2, as amended, ordered to stand of the Bill. \nClauses 3 to 8 ordered to stand of the Bill. \nClause 9 (The Board) \nMotion made and question proposed: “that the clause stand part of the Bill.” \nMr Pentiah: Madam Chairperson, I move for the following amendments to clause 9 – \n“in clause 9, in subclause (5), by deleting the word “Director-General” and \nreplacing it by the word “Registrar”;” \nAmendment agreed to. \nClause 9, as amended, ordered to stand of the Bill. \nClauses 10 to 15 ordered to stand of the Bill. \nClause 16 (Academic Council) \nMotion made and question proposed: “that the clause stand part of the Bill.” \nMr Pentiah: Madam Chairperson, I move for the following amendment to clause 16 – \n“in clause 16, in subclause (3), by deleting subparagraph (b) and replacing it by the \nfollowing subparagraph – \n(c) \nthe Registrar;” \nAmendment agreed to. \nClause 16, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClauses 17 to 19 ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClause 20 (Director-General) \nMotion made and question proposed: “that the clause stand part of the Bill.” \n\n134 \n \nMr Pentiah: Madam Chairperson, I move for the following amendments to clause 20 – \n“in clause 20 – \n(i) \nby deleting the heading and replacing it by the following heading – \n20. \nRegistrar \n(ii) \nin subclauses (1), (2) and (3) by deleting the word “Director-General” \nand replacing it by the word “Registrar”; \n(iii) \nby deleting subclause (4) and replacing it by the following subclause \n–  \n(4) \nThe Registrar shall be responsible to the Board for \nthe – \n(a) \nprovision of necessary advice to the Board \non policy matters as well as the execution of \nthe Board policies and decisions; \n(b) \nday to day administration and the \nestablishment of sound management policies \nand a proper internal control system for the \nefficient operation of the Institute; \n(c) \npreparation of the business plan and budget \nfor training programmes and monitor \nexpenditure of the Institute; \n(d) \nfurther development and implementation of \na blended learning system to cater for \ndemand-driven training needs in the public \nservice;  \n(e) \ndevelopment of capacity and capability \nbuilding of the Institute as an awarding \nbody; \n(f) \nkeeping of records including admissions and \nresults; \n(g) \npreparation of examinations, assessments \nand award ceremony; and \n(h) \nprovision of support and information in \nrelation to enrolment, programme enquiry, \nadmission, fees, discipline and complaint.” \nAmendment agreed to. \nClause 20, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill. \n\n135 \n \nClause 21 (Appointment of employees) \nMotion made and question proposed: “that the clause stand part of the Bill.” \nMr Pentiah: Madam Chairperson, I move for the following amendment to clause 21 – \n“in clause 21, in subclause (2) by deleting the word “Director-General” and replacing \nit by the word “Registrar”;” \nAmendment agreed to. \nClause 21, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClauses 22 to 25 ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClause 26 (Delegation) \nMotion made and question proposed: “that the clause stand part of the Bill.” \nMr Pentiah: Madam Chairperson, I move for the following amendment to clause 26 – \n“ in clause 26, in subclause (1) by deleting the word “Director-General” and replacing it \nby the word “Registrar”;” \nAmendment agreed to. \nClause 26, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClauses 27 to 33 ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClause 34 (Savings and transitional provisions) \nMotion made and question proposed: “that the clause stand part of the Bill.” \nMr Pentiah: Madam Chairperson, I move for the following amendment to clause 34 – \n“in clause 34, in subclause (3) by deleting the word “Director-General of the Institute” \nand replacing it by the word “Registrar of the Institute”.” \nAmendment agreed to. \nClause 34, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClauses 35 ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nThe Schedule ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nThe title and enacting clause were agreed to. \n\n136 \n \nThe Bill, as amended, was agreed to. \nOn the Assembly resuming with Madam Speaker in the Chair, Madam Speaker reported \naccordingly. \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Public Service and \nInnovation Bill (No. XXII of 2025) was read a third time and passed. \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Friday 10 October 2025 at 3.00 p.m. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned! \nAt 7.03 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Friday 10 October 2025 at \n3.00 p.m. \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nMR K. P. – CONTRACT TERMS & CONDITIONS – OVERSEAS \nMISSIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/866",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 866,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/866) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Village of Amaury, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information as to \nwhether it is in presence of complaints from commuters thereof regarding bus operators not \noperating bus services according to schedules, indicating whether surveys have been carried \nout to ascertain same and, if so, indicate the remedial measures being envisaged, including \nsanctioning defaulting operators and re-allocating these routes to other bus operators.",
      "answer": "Reply: According to information obtained from the National Land Transport Authority \n(NLTA), there are currently four bus routes plying through the village of Amaury, namely – \n(i) \nroute 53 (Belmont Traffic Centre - Central Flacq) which is being served by \nindividual bus operators, and \n(ii) \nroutes 24 (Port Louis – Haute Rive), 226 (Rose Hill – Haute Rive) and 222 \n(Curepipe – Haute Rive) being operated by the National Transport Corporation. \nSurveys carried out in August and September 2025 by the NLTA Inspectorate revealed \nthat due to shortage of buses, fewer trips are being performed along all the routes thereby \ndisrupting the time table and giving rise to outcry from the inhabitants of Amaury. \nThe NLTA has further informed that through route 53, which also passes through the \nvillages of Amaury and Laventure, extends over a distance of approximately 26 kms,19 buses \nhave been licenced to operate along routes 26/53. The route is being serviced by only 17 \nindividual owned buses affiliated with the Flacq Bus Owners Cooperative Society Ltd \n(FBOCSL) as two buses are due for replacement on account of their age. These buses also \nprovide service along route 26 (Belmont Traffic Centre – Central Flacq via Roche Noires). \nThe frequency of the service is of 20 minutes on each route throughout the day. \nThe 17 buses also perform not less than seven school trips daily during school days. \nBuses of route 26/53 have been authorised to transit via Poudre d’Or Hospital at specific \ntimes of the day. \n\n149 \n \nThe Ministry of Land Transport understands that complaints mainly relate to failure of \nbus operators to provide scheduled trips whenever buses are off-road due to breakdown or \nshortage of bus crew. \nThe NLTA has scheduled a meeting with all bus operators of route 26/53 and the Flacq \nBus Owners Cooperative on 13 October 2025 to review the current transport situation and to \ndecide on the way forward. \nAs regards route 24, complaints are registered on account of poor service levels due to \nbreakdown buses. As already mentioned in my reply to PQ B/851 earlier, the situation at the \nNTC will improve progressively with the incoming fleet of 95 electric buses and 20 new \ndiesel buses. \nThe NLTA considers that the services being provided by NTC along routes 222 and 226 \nare satisfactory. Nevertheless, it will be maintaining regular checks along these routes in spite \nof its shortage of staff in its Inspectorate Cadre. \nFurthermore, the NLTA is envisaging to grant two additional Road Service Licences \nalong route 26/53. These two buses will relieve the transport situation along the route \nincluding the village of Amaury. \n \nE-SERVICES PLATFORM PROJECT – IMPLEMENTATION TIMEFRAME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/867",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 867,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/867) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity whether, in \nregard to the E-Services Platform Project of his Ministry, he will state the timeframe for the \nimplementation thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nVALLÉE PITOT/TRANQUEBAR REGIONS – WATER SUPPLY – ADDITIONAL \nWATER PIPES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/868",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 868,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/868) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to water supply \nin Vallée Pitot/Tranquebar and adjoining areas, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Central Water Authority, information as to where matters stand regarding the laying \nof additional water pipes from Plaine Lauzun to Monneron and from Pailles to the pumping \nstation of Plaine Lauzun which were part of budgetary estimates 2023-2024. \n\n150",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Central Water Authority (CWA) that water supply in \nVallée Pitot, Tranquebar and adjoining areas is 10 to 12 hours daily due to inadequate volume \nof water pumped to the service reservoirs and limited carrying capacity of existing pumping \nmains. \nThere was a proposal in 2017 for the laying of an additional dedicated pipeline of 5.2 \nkm from New Plaine Lauzun Pumping Station to Upper Monneron Reservoir to address \nwater intermittency. The feasibility study was carried out in November 2017.  Subsequently, \nthe pumping capacity of Plaine Lauzun Pumping Station has been upgraded in order to cater \nfor pumping of additional water to Upper Monneron Reservoir and Priest Peak Reservoir. In \naddition, the upgraded pumping station was commissioned in 2018 when the existing Plaine \nLauzun Pumping Station had to be relocated as it was situated on the alignment of the Metro. \nFor the water improvement project to materialise, the CWA has to lay some 5.2 km of \npipeline to connect the new Plaine Lauzun Pumping Station to Upper Monneron Reservoir.   \nHowever, due to cancellation of the procurement exercise on two occasions and \nsignificant increases in the project value over time, I am informed by the CWA that the \nproject was not executed in Financial Year 2023/2024. \nNo funds have been provided under the current Budget. The project cost will be \nreassessed by the CWA and re-submitted for financing. \nRODRIGUES – GENDER & FAMILY WELFARE – REGIONAL POLICIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/869",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 869,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/869) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nGender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to her recent visit to Rodrigues \nIsland, she will state the purposes and key outcomes thereof, indicating the mechanisms and \nplans, if any, being established with the collaboration of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly to \nensure that regional policies on gender and family welfare are effectively aligned with the \nnational legislative frameworks.",
      "answer": "Reply: I wish to inform the House that I led a high-level delegation to Rodrigues from \n22 to 23 September 2025, in the context of the handing over of the Gender Policy for \nRodrigues to the Commissioner for Women’s Affairs and others. The Ambassador of the \nEuropean Union to Mauritius and Seychelles also participated in the visit. \nIn the margins of the ceremony, I had the opportunity to pay courtesy visits on the \nChief Commissioner and the Commissioner for Women’s Affairs and Others, respectively, on \nthe first day of the mission, where we engaged in fruitful discussions on strategic actions to \n\n151 \n \npromote gender equality, children’s rights and family welfare in the local Rodrigues context. \nWe also shared experiences on reporting and monitoring of gender-based violence cases and \ndiscussed areas of collaboration to improve service delivery.   \nI also had the opportunity to attend a consultative meeting with representatives of the \nCommission for Women’s Affairs and Others and the Police Department on Child Day Care \nCentres (CDCCs) in Rodrigues. The Regulations governing CDCCs in Mauritius are under \nreview to address operational challenges related to licensing and enforcement.  \nA working session on the draft Domestic Abuse Bill and the draft Adoption Bill was \nalso organised. \nI also met the Minority Leader of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly.  I specifically \nrequested this meeting dans le but d’avoir le point de vue de tout le monde à Rodrigues, \nensuring that no voice is left unheard. \nDuring our informal meeting, she raised several important concerns with regard to \ngender and children. This meeting was part of our wider objective to ensure comprehensive \nconsultation in Rodrigues. \nI also participated in an interactive session with women entrepreneurs from Rodrigues, \norganised by the National Women’s Entrepreneur Council, which will collaborate closely \nwith these businesswomen to extend capacity-building programmes aimed at enhancing, \nimproving, and diversifying their enterprises and sharing best practices. \nSAINT-JEAN CEMETERY – DAMAGED TOMBS – NOVEMBER 2023 FLOODS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/870",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 870,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/870) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the 300 tombs at the Saint-\nJean Cemetery which were damaged during the floods which occurred between 08 November \n2023 and 15 January 2024, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National \nDevelopment Unit, information as to the current state thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nVALLÉE DES PRÊTRES, MORC. RAMLAGUN – FLOOD MITIGATION \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/871",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 871,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/871) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to flood mitigation \nmeasures within the region of Vallée des Prêtres, particularly in Morcellement Ramlagun, \n\n152 \n \nincluding the placing of rock bunds at critical locations as per the report issued on 16 \nSeptember 2025,  he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Land Drainage \nAuthority, information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \nPOINTE AUX CANNONNIERS, VALE, GRAND BAY, FOND DU SAC, \nSOTTISE & GOODLANDS – IRREGULAR WATER SUPPLY – MEASURES \nENVISAGED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/872",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 872,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/872) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to Pointe aux \nCannonniers, Vale, Grand Bay, Fond du Sac, Sottise and Goodlands, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to the number of \ncomplaints received from inhabitants of the said regions regarding irregular water supply \nprevailing thereat since December 2024 to September 2025, indicating the measures being \nproposed for the provision of regular water supply thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nVALLETA B6 BYPASS – SPEED CAMERAS & TRAFFIC LIGHTS \nIMPLEMENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/873",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 873,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/873) Mr P. G. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & \nMoka) asked the Minister of Land Transport whether in regard to the proposed installation of \nspeed cameras and pedestrian traffic lights at the Valleta B6 Bypass, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the Traffic Management & Road Safety Unit, information as to \nwhere matters stand, indicating the – \n(a)  reasons for the delay in implementation, and  \n(b)  expected coming into operation date thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPOLICE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE BILL – PROPOSED INTRODUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/874",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 874,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/874) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nAttorney-General whether, in regard to the proposed introduction of the Police and Criminal \nJustice Bill in the Assembly, he will state where matters stand, indicating whether the \npractice of lodging provisional charges against every suspect of arrestable offences after \nevery arrested offence will be done away with.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n\n153 \n \nCEB – POWER CUTS – REMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/875",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 875,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/875) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the recurrent power \ncuts island-wide, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Electricity \nBoard, information as to the measures being envisaged to address same.",
      "answer": "Reply: At the very outset, I have to inform the hon. Member that it is incorrect to say \nthat there are recurrent power cuts across the island. \nThe Central Electricity Board has informed that power cuts are of two types: planned \noutages or unplanned outages. Planned outages are those which are scheduled and \ncommunicated in advance to allow for maintenance, repairs, or upgrading works aimed at \nensuring long-term reliability and safety of the electricity supply. Unplanned outages are \nthose which occur due to faults on the network, such as sudden equipment failures, and can \nalso result from adverse weather conditions or other unforeseen incidents. \nRecent interruptions in certain areas have been linked to essential maintenance, \nequipment faults, and adverse weather conditions. \nIn cases of unplanned power cuts, standby emergency crews, operating 24/7 and \nstrategically deployed across the island, intervene promptly to restore supply in the shortest \npossible time. \nTo minimise both the frequency and duration of outages, the CEB is actively pursuing \nthe following measures, namely network reinforcement, preventive maintenance and \ninfrastructure development. \nI seize this opportunity to inform the House that the forthcoming summer season will \nbe challenging for the Central Electricity Board in view of increasing electricity consumption \nand limited reserve margins. My Ministry has worked on a national energy efficiency \ncampaign to sensitise the public on the importance of energy saving and energy efficiency \nthrough the media and other communication channels. \nI appeal to the general public to adopt energy saving practices, particularly during \nevening peak period between 6 p.m. to 9.30 p.m. \n \n\n154 \n \nPORT-LOUIS NORTH SSS – STUDENT/TEACHING STAFF RATIO",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/876",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 876,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/876) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the \nPort-Louis North State Secondary School, he will state the – \n(a)  number of students enrolled thereat, indicating the enrolment trend over the past \nfive years and whether same raises concern and, if so, the corrective measures, if \nany, envisaged in relation thereto, and  \n(b) \npupil/teacher ratio thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nFLIC EN FLAC – LAND ACQUISITION – HOME FOR THE ELDERLY – \nCONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/877",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 877,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/877) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity whether, in regard \nto a plot of land situated at Flic en Flac acquired in 2015 by his Ministry, he will state where \nmatters stand as to the proposed construction of a home for the elderly thereat, indicating – \n(a) \nhow same is being financed, and  \n(b)  whether it is envisaged to engage and consult with Non-Government \nOrganisations for the conceptualisation and implementation thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: The project for the construction of a home for the elderly at Flic en Flac is \npresently at design stage at the level of the Ministry of National Infrastructure. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, funds have not been provided for this project in \nthis Ministry’s budget in Financial Year 2025/2026. Instead, the project has been placed \nunder the Public Sector Investment Programme as a Project Under Preparation. Financial \nclearance will be sought once the design and bidding documents are finalised, expectedly by \nJune 2026. \nThe project value for the construction of the Elderly Home was estimated Rs172.5 \nmillion in April 2024. This cost estimate will have to be reviewed in line with the new project \ndesign and market value. \nWith a view to better monitoring the implementation of Capital Projects undertaken by \nthis Ministry, a Civil Engineer from the Ministry of National Infrastructure has been \nseconded to this Ministry to act as Project Coordinator with effect from 01 October 2025.  \n\n155 \n \nIt is expected that, with the assistance of the aforesaid Project Coordinator, Capital \nProjects, including the construction of the home at Flic en Flac, will be implemented in a \nmore timely and effective manner.  \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, this Ministry will consider engaging with NGOs \nfor the conceptualisation and implementation of the project. \n \nBUS ROUTES 5 & 243 – TRIPS FREQUENCY & COMPLAINTS – STUDENT \nCOMMUTERS ANALYSIS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/878",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 878,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/878) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to bus routes 5 and 243, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information as to – \n(a) \nthe number of trips per day being operated by bus operators along same, \nindicating the number of complaints received in relation thereto and the actions \ntaken, if any, and  \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given for a survey to be carried out as to the \nnumber of students commuting along the said routes in the morning.",
      "answer": "Reply: According to information obtained from the NLTA, Route 5 (Baie du Cap to \nQuatre Bornes) extends over 48 km and involves 30 stages. It is served by twenty-one \nindividual bus operators and eighty-four trips are performed on a daily basis. No formal \ncomplaint regarding unsatisfactory bus services has been lodged with the NLTA as at 07 \nOctober 2025 for this particular route. \nHowever, a few verbal complaints pertaining mainly to non-compliance with bus time \ntable, transboarding of passengers and frequent breakdown of buses along this route have \nbeen received.  \nRoute 243 (Chamarel to Quatre Bornes) extends over 37 km and involves 23 stages and \nit is serviced by two individual operators (Perle Logistics Ltd. and Perle de la Savanne Ltd.) \nand one bus of the National Transport Corporation (NTC). 25 trips have to be performed \ndaily, according to the timetable. \nOn 02 October 2025, the Ministry of Land Transport had a meeting session with \nofficers of the NLTA to take stock of the transport situation in the region of Chamarel and \nneighbouring localities. \n\n156 \n \nDuring that meeting, the NLTA was requested to explore the possibility of deploying \nmini buses for easier maneuvering along Route 243 having regards to the topography of the \nroad to and from Chamarel. The NLTA has accordingly contacted two bus companies (UBS \nand RHT) to supplement the services. They are agreeable to the proposal on the condition \nthat they are compensated additionally for such services. \nA meeting has been also held at the level of the NLTA with the two existing individual \noperators of Route 243 where they gave assurance that – \n1. \nPerle Logistics Ltd. will vary temporarily one bus from Route 5 to Route 243 \nwith immediate effect; \n2. \nPerle de la Savanne Ltd. is acquiring a new bus which will operate along route \n243 as from next week. \nThe abovementioned buses are all 60 seaters and not suitable for Route 243. They will \nbe replaced by their owners by 40-seater buses in some two months’ time.  \nThe NLTA will also conduct a survey on the level of services in the region and \ndetermine whether there is need to grant additional licences. \nIn the meantime, the NLTA is maintaining regular checks and monitoring the services \nalong both routes despite its acute shortage of inspectors.  \nAs regards part (b) of the question, according to information obtained from NLTA, the \nmajority of students are currently not attending school regularly due to end of year exams. \nThe NLTA is, therefore, liaising with the school administration to obtain data on the number \nof students commuting along these routes. \nGAZA-ISRAEL CONFLICT– MAURITIUS’ OFFICIAL STANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/879",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 879,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade",
      "question": "(No. B/879) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade whether, in regard \nto Gaza, following recent findings and official statements from the United Nations (UN) and \nother international bodies confirming serious violations of international humanitarian law \nand acts constituting genocide committed thereat, he will state if Government will consider – \n(a) \ncondemning Israel’s actions in stronger terms at the UN and elsewhere; \n(b) \nsevering/suspending diplomatic relations with Israel until a verified, immediate \nand permanent ceasefire is observed and respected, and \n(c) \nsupporting/joining international legal actions before the International Court of \nJustice in defence of Palestinian civilian lives and international law. \n\n157",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nHARRY LATOUR STADIUM – RENOVATION WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/880",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 880,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/880) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine \nMagnien) asked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the renovation \nworks undertaken at the Harry Latour Stadium, he will state where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nDARUTY & VALE JUNCTION – TRAFFIC CONGESTION – REMEDIAL \nACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/881",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 881,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/881) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to junction Daruty and \nVale, he will state if a survey has been carried out to assess the traffic congestion occurring \nthereat between 7 a.m. and 9 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 7 p.m. and, if so, indicate the – \n(a) \nfindings thereof, and \n(b) \n remedial actions being envisaged in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nTRIOLET & NEIGHBOURING REGIONS – RECURRENT WATER CUTS – \nMEASURES TAKEN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/882",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 882,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/882) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the recurrent water cuts \naffecting domestic users, commercial operators and planters in Triolet and neighbouring \nregions, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, \ninformation as to the measures being taken to alleviate same, indicating – \n(a)  the number of new boreholes drilled and currently operational, and  \n(b)  how will the water distribution be made per categories of users in times of major \nwater shortages.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Central Water Authority (CWA) that Triolet and \nneighbouring regions are supplied by water from Service Reservoirs at New Plaine des \nPapayes and Bois Mangues. The main sources of water are La Nicolière Reservoir, Boreholes \nand Containerised Pressure Filters installed on the Irrigation Authority’s pipelines. The \nintermittent hours of supply range from 10 to 12 hours daily. \nRecently these regions have witnessed some severe disruptions in water supply, caused \nmainly by the sharing of the network between CWA and the Irrigation Authority. With a \n\n158 \n \nview to better managing water resources and taking into account the rainfall situation, the \nirrigation regime in the North was increased from twice weekly to three times weekly as from \nMay 2025, that is, on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. To enable the Reservoir at Plaine \ndes Papayes to fill up to capacity, and with adequate pressure, in order to serve the region of \nTriolet, it is important that irrigation be carried out as per agreed volume and frequency.  \nGiven the inter dependency of these systems, any change in these arrangements will \nadversely affect water supply to the inhabitants. These coordination issues are being \naddressed to avoid disruptions in water supply in the future.  \nIn addition, it is to be outlined that one Containerised Pressure Filter installed at \nSolitude had to be switched off due to insufficient water at Bassin Pyram, hence also \nimpacting on water supply at Solitude and 7ème Mille Triolet.  The CWA has already carried \nout the removal of debris and pest plants within the abstraction zone which has allowed the \ninstallation of a surface pump to abstract water for treatment purposes. \nAs I indicated in my previous reply to PQ B/872, since I assumed office, I have taken \nstock of the situation in the North and measures have been taken to mobilise water, as a \nmatter of priority in this region.  \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, my Ministry and CWA have drilled new \nboreholes and have also co-shared the operation of private boreholes. \nIn addition, a new Containerised Pressure Filter of capacity of 2,000 m³/day at Plaine \ndes Papayes Reservoir has been commissioned on 06 October 2025.   \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, in order to improve the co-sharing of the \nIrrigation Authority (IA) network, an agreement has been reached for the establishment of a \ndedicated abstraction point on the existing IA pipeline for the CWA. This measure is \nintended to ensure that the CPFs at the Plaine des Papayes Reservoir remain unaffected \nduring IA diversions for the supply of water to planters. \nI wish to inform the House that the Prime Minister has personally discussed the matter \nwith me and I am monitoring the situation closely. It is essential to manage our scarce water \nresources especially as current weather forecasts indicate little or no significant rainfall in the \ncoming days. Consequently, all reservoirs are expected to be impacted, with La Nicolière \nlikely to be the first to show signs of stress. \nThe Ministry will continue to work in close collaboration with relevant stakeholders for \nan improved water supply especially in the North. \n \n \n\n159 \n \nROAD TRAFFIC ACT ENFORCEMENT – NON-COMPLIANT MOTORCYCLES – \nSEIZURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/883",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 883,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/883) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the enforcement of the \nRoad Traffic Act, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land \nTransport Authority, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of motorcycles seized for non-compliance with the relevant provisions of \nthe Act since November 2024 to date, indicating the reasons therefor, and  \n(b) \nmeasures being taken to strengthen enforcement and ensure that non-compliant \nmotorcycles are removed from circulation.",
      "answer": "Reply: In relation to noisy motorcycles with altered exhaust systems which cause a \nnuisance in several residential areas throughout the island, it is noted that Regulations 83 and \n84 of the Road Traffic (Construction and Use of Motor Vehicles) Regulations 2010 make \nprovisions for the use of vehicles, including motorcycles, with efficient exhaust systems and \nalso sets the maximum permissible noise level (98 dbA) beyond which any person using a \nvehicle will constitute an offence under the law and may be prosecuted.  \nAlthough Section 173 of the Road Traffic Act empowers the Police or a Road \nTransport Inspector to affix seals to any vehicle used in contravention of the Act or any \nregulations made under it to cause a discontinuance of the offence, in case of noisy \nmotorcycles, enforcement of authorities have drawn attention to practical problems being \nencountered for noise levels emitted to be measured during roadside checks.  \nThe Commissioner of Police and the NLTA have thus informed that they have not \nestablished any contravention against motorcycle for the offence of emitting excessive noise \nduring the period November 2024 to 07 October 2025. Consequently, no motorcycle has been \nput under seals for that offence. It is to be noted that the Road Traffic Act authorises a vehicle \nto be detained and affixed with seals, but does not allow for a vehicle to be seized.  \nAs regards part (b) of the question, Regulation 10 and 22 of the Road Traffic (Control \nof Vehicle Emissions) Regulations 2002 fines were increased from Rs5,000 to Rs10,000, \nwith effect from 09 August 2025. My Ministry will consider an amendment to the regulations \nto enable enforcement on noisy motorcycles to be eased and to allow for prosecution \n\n160 \n \nproceedings to be initiated on the basis of using motorcycles with modified exhaust system. \nThus, circumventing the requirement for measuring the noise emitted. \n \nSAINT-JEAN ROAD, QUATRE BORNES – EMERGENCY EVACUATION PLAN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/884",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 884,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/884) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to Saint-Jean Road in Quatre Bornes, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether an emergency \nevacuation plan has been put in place in case of the occurrence of incidents including fire \noutbreaks, accidents or medical urgencies and, if so, give details thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nCITÉ LA FERME, BAMBOUS – WASTE WATER NETWORK PROJECT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/885",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 885,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/885) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nMinister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the Waste Water Network \nProject in Cité La Ferme, Bambous, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nWaste Water Management Authority, information as to – \n(a) \nwhether all the households have been connected to the network and, if not, why \nnot, indicating whether consideration will be given for Avenue de \nl'Indépendance to be connected thereto, and \n(b) \nthe sum of money paid to the contractor for variation works as at date.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSPORTS INFRASTRUCTURES – CLEANING & MAINTENANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/886",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 886,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/886) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the sports infrastructures falling under \nthe purview of his Ministry and that of the Mauritius Sports Council, respectively, he will \nstate/for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to how the cleaning and maintenance \nthereof are carried out and whether dedicated team are entrusted therefor on each site.",
      "answer": "Reply: My Ministry owns 49 sports infrastructures, out of which 25 are managed by \nthe Mauritius Sports Council (MSC). In addition, the MSC manages ten Multi-Use Games \nArea (MUGA) sports complexes, which it has taken over from the Mauritius Telecom \nFoundation.  \nAs the House is aware, I have repeatedly voiced out my serious concerns over the \ndeplorable state of several sports infrastructures which we inherited from the previous \n\n161 \n \nGovernment. These infrastructures require major renovation, upgrading or refurbishment of \nelectrical installations which include fire alarm system, defective floodlights, civil works and \nwaterproofing for serious leakages. The House will surely agree that to repair and maintain \nsuch infrastructures, significant amount of resources, in terms of finance, expertise, time, \nmanpower, among others are required. \nThe day-to-day cleaning, which on certain occasions include deep cleaning and \ndisinfection of certain areas, are carried out by officers of my Ministry and the MSC. My \nMinistry avails the services of the same staff members for minor general maintenance works. \nMy Ministry is working on the establishment of a framework comprising a \ncomprehensive system of regular cleaning, inspections, preventive upkeep, and timely repairs \nto ensure safety, optimal performance, and longevity of its infrastructures. It will also cater \nfor in-house maintenance, ad-hoc maintenance and the procuring of services of sports \nfacilities management companies. Additionally, it will include maintenance contracts with \nspecified service providers, through competitive bidding exercises, for the maintenance of \nspecific equipment and infrastructures. \nMELVILLE, GRAND GAUBE – BUS ROUTE 178 – IRREGULAR SERVICES – \nREMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/887",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 887,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/887) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre D'or) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to bus route 178 in Melville, Grand \nGaube, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport \nAuthority, information as to whether urgent remedial measures will be taken to ensure regular \npublic transport services along same.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFOND DU SAC – COMPULSORY LAND ACQUISITION – PORTION NUMBER 40 – \nSETTLEMENT DATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/888",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 888,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/888) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre D'or) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the compulsory land \nacquisition of portion number 40 for the construction of drains for flood mitigation measures \nat Fond du Sac in 2018, he will state the reasons for the non-settlement of the price payable to \nthe land owners thereof as at to date, indicating the expected date of settlement thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nST JULIEN D’HOTMAN B24 ROAD – PIPE LAYING PROJECT – ROAD \nREINSTATEMENT \n\n162",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/889",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 889,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/889) Mr G. P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & \nMoka) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether in regard to the Pipe Laying \nProject along St Julien d’Hotman B24 Rd, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \nthe Central Water Authority, information as to where matters stand, indicating the – \n(a) \nreasons why complete reinstatement of the roads in areas where pipe laying \nworks have been completed have not been carried out, and  \n(b) \nexpected completion date of the whole project.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSOCIAL REGISTER OF MAURITIUS – FREE INTERNET CONNECTION – \nFAMILIES REGISTERED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/890",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 890,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/890) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \nwhether, in regard to the provision of free internet connection to families on the Social \nRegister of Mauritius, as announced in the Budget 2025–2026, he will state the – \n(a) \nmodalities thereof, and  \n(b) \npresent number of families registered on the Social Register of Mauritius to date, \nindicating the number thereof having applied and benefiting from this measure.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nAFRICAN NETWORK INFORMATION CENTRE – INTEGRITY PRESERVATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/891",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 891,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/891) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in \nregard to the African Network Information Centre, he will state the key actions taken to \npreserve the integrity thereof, indicating where matters stand as at to date.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFLACQ DISTRICT COUNCIL – FINANCES MISMANAGEMENT– INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/892",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 892,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/892) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the alleged case of \nmismanagement of the finances at the Flacq District Council over the past ten years, he will \nstate if his Ministry will consider initiating an inquiry thereinto.",
      "answer": "Reply: No adverse observation with regard to mismanagement of funds for the District \nCouncil of Flacq has been made by the Director of Audit over the last ten years.  \n\n163 \n \nI am informed however, that the Financial Crimes Commission (FCC) is presently \ncarrying-out an enquiry in connection with the procurement of plastic household bins \nacquired in October 2023. \nI am advised that during the Council meeting held on 25 June 2024, some Councillors \nraised concerns on the procurement exercise for acquisition of bins. The Internal Auditor of \nthe Council was requested to carry-out an investigation thereon. However, no irregularity was \nnoted. \nI am further informed that the Chief Executive referred the matter to the Legal Adviser \nof the Council. The latter was of the opinion that in view of the fact that there might be some \nirregularities the matter should be referred to the appropriate authority for investigation.  \nThe Chief Executive, therefore, referred the matter to the FCC on 29 June 2024 for \nfurther investigation and same is still ongoing.  \nThe Council has apprised that as at date, one officer was called to depone before the \nFCC on 24 April and 07 May 2025.   \nAs soon as the outcome of the enquiry would be known, actions would be taken as \nappropriate. \nGINGER – UNFAIR COMPETITION – SALE & IMPORTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/893",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 893,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/893) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nwhether, in regard to ginger, he will state whether he is in presence of representations from \nplanters thereof as to any unfair competition to which they are facing from importers thereof \nand, if so – \n(a) \nindicate the measures his Ministry proposes to take in relation thereto, and  \n(b) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Agricultural Marketing Board, \ninformation as to whether consideration could be given for the local production \nthereof to be purchased at a guaranteed price and be given priority on sale.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGOVERNMENT BUILDINGS & PREMISES – ABANDONED/RENOVATION \nSTATE – PROPOSED REINSTATEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/894",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 894,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/894) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to Government buildings and premises, \nhe will state the number thereof presently lying in abandoned states and/or under renovation, \n\n164 \n \nindicating if an assessment of costs to Government in terms of rental of buildings and \npremises by Ministries and Government agencies have been made and whether consideration \nwill be given for the reinstatement of abandoned Government buildings and premises with a \nview to offsetting the costs to Government in terms of rentals.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPRIVATE HEALTHCARE SERVICES – FEES & CHARGES – REGULATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/895",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 895,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/895) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the \nfees and charges for services provided by the private healthcare sector, he will state whether \nmeasures are being put in place for the regulation thereof, including the fixing of the quantum \nthereof and prevention of any kind of collusion in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nUPPER NOUVELLE-DECOUVERTE – IRREGULAR WATER SUPPLY – \nREMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/896",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 896,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/896) Mr P. G. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & \nMoka) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether in regard to Upper \nNouvelle-Decouverte, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water \nAuthority, information as to whether urgent remedial measures will be taken to address the \nvery irregular and inadequate water supply thereat, including considering operating a new \nborehole or a buffer water tank thereat.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/860) \n \nLA LOUISE, QUATRE BORNES – FLOOD MITIGATION MEASURES – DRAINS \nCONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/897",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 897,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/897) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the flood mitigation \nmeasures in the region of La Louise, Quatre Bornes he will state if consideration will be \ngiven for the construction of drains along the Lal Bahadur Shastri Avenue and Boundary \nRoad behind the Queen Victoria Hospital, instead of solely along the Candos-Vacoas Road.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRIVIÈRE DES CRÉOLES, BOIS DES AMOURETTES, BAMBOUS VIRIEUX & \nGRAND SABLE – FOOTBALL PITCHES – LIGHTING FACILITIES \n\n165",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/898",
      "sitting_id": "07-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-07",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 898,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/898) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the football pitches of Rivière \ndes Créoles, Bois des Amourettes, Bambous Virieux and Grand Sable, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the District Council of Grand Port, information as to the proposed \ntimeframe for the installation of lighting facilities thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/899",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 899,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/899) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to his recent State Visit to the Republic of India, he will – \n(a) \nstate the – \n(i) \ncomposition of the accompanying delegation, indicating in each case, \nthe official capacity thereof, and \n(ii) \ntotal cost incurred by Government in relation thereto, including cost of \nairfares, accommodation, transport and per diem allowance paid in \nrespect of each member of the delegation, and \n(b) \ntable copy of the official programme thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, as I stated during my press conference on 27 \nSeptember 2025 following my State visit to India, I was invited by Shri Narendra Modi to \nvisit India.  \nIn fact, on the very day, the results were coming out in Constituency No. 5. He rang me. \nI left the place; I came to my residence because there was too much noise, and he invited me \nto come to India. And I explained, unfortunately, because the results of the elections were not \nyet proclaimed, and obviously, I would need to look at urgent matters – we were sure there \nwas going to be urgent matters as Prime Minister – so, I could not undertake the visit right \naway, but I will undertake the visit at some point. \nWith regard to part (a)(i) of the question, I wish to inform the House that I led a high-\nlevel delegation to India from 09 to 16 September 2025. The delegation comprised of five \nMinisters, one Junior Minister, one Member of Parliament, senior government officials, heads \nof key public institutions and some 50 representatives of the private sector. \nIn regard to part (a)(ii) of the question, I think it is ironical that the hon. Member, who \nhimself undertook three missions during the short stint he was Speaker – 78 days to be exact \n– appointed under very dubious circumstances is more interested in expenses incurred for the \nmission – such an important mission, instead of focusing on the outcome of the visit. \nIn fact, during the 78 days of his Speakership, the hon. Member travelled for more than \n13 days. \n\n21 \n \nMr A. Duval: You have said it at least three times! \nThe Prime Minister: No, but I do have to repeat it. \nThe Prime Minister: To three different countries! \nMr A. Duval: As long as you…another. \nThe Prime Minister: Except for him – except for you –, nobody is aware of the \nbenefits that the country derived from the nearly Rs800,000 spent on these missions! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Jouisseur! \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the total cost incurred, in respect of the Prime \nMinister’s Office, during my State visit to India and the official delegation is around Rs3.8 \nmillion, representing basically airfares, allowances and so on. I must point out, Madam \nSpeaker, that the quantum of the allowances is based on the same rate applicable since 2017. \nIt has not been changed. \nI wish to inform the House that my State visit resulted in a Special Economic Package \nto the tune of 680 million US Dollars, which is approximately Rs31 billion. The financial \nassistance will meet the needs and priorities in Mauritius in several areas.  \nIndia has also agreed to give us a grant of 25 million US Dollars as budgetary support \nfor this financial year. 25 million dollars! \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, I consider it frankly a lack of respect towards the \nPrime Minister of India and his Government for the hon. Member to request a detailed copy \nof the programme of the visit. It is India who decides where I should go and whom I should \nmeet. It is not me who says I want do this and I want to do that. \n(Interruptions) \nYou should know all this!  \nMadam Speaker, let me highlight the salient features of the State visit – \n(i) \nThe visit started with India-Mauritius Business Conclave, held on 10 September \n2025 in Mumbai, which was jointly organised by the Economic Development \nBoard and the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry. \nThe business meeting brought together some 200 Indian and 55 Mauritian private \nsector players. It allowed Mauritian businessmen to network with their Indian \ncounterparts for potential collaboration in various sectors of interest, including \n\n22 \n \nfinancial services, Information and Communication technology, medical Services, \nand manufacturing. \nThis meeting resulted in the identification of several important foreign direct \ninvestment potential. Some high-level investors have already travelled to \nMauritius and will soon be embarking on high value projects. The Lilavati \nFoundation which came to Mauritius soon after my visit met me there. They will \nembark on the construction of a 200-bed multi-speciality hospital. It will be a \nstate-of-the-art hospital which will include a separate paediatric and \ngynaecological ward. \nThis will help Mauritius. Instead of our patients having to travel to India to get \ntop medical care, this will be here in Mauritius. They will not have to pay for \nwhatever rooms they will have to rent. They will not have to pay.  The travelling \nis very expensive. So, this will help. \nThe Economic Development Board also partnered with InvestUP to organize an \nIndia-Mauritius Business meeting in Varanasi. The event attracted 50 private \nsector operators from Uttar Pradesh and discussions centred on fostering joint \ncollaboration and facilitating two-way investment between Uttar Pradesh and \nMauritius. \nThe official part of my State visit started in Varanasi, making it the first time that a \nHead of Government was received in Varanasi. This is a religious and cultural heartbeat of \nIndia, and also it happens to be the parliamentary constituency of Prime Minister Narendra \nModi. \n(ii) \nAs a prelude to my meeting with the Prime Minister of India, I had a working \nsession with the Foreign Secretary of India, Mr Vikram Misri. \nOur discussions focused on the launch of various new projects and on addressing \nthe implementation of existing agreements, including the Double Taxation \nAvoidance Agreement. \n(iii) On 10 September 2025, I had a one-to-one meeting with the Prime Minister of \nIndia, Mr Narendra Modi, in Varanasi. The one-to-one meeting with Shree \nNarendra Modi was followed by a working session.  \nWe discussed key issues of mutual importance, including regional security and \nour shared commitment to an ‘Enhanced Strategic Partnership’. \n\n23 \n \nFurthermore, I had in-depth discussions related to the Double Taxation Avoidance \nAgreement, highlighting how the Protocol signed by the previous government in \nMay 2016 is undermining our financial services sector to the advantage of other \ncountries like Singapore, Netherlands and all these. We agreed to pursue further \nconsultations to ensure a mutually beneficial outcome and alignment on key \nissues before we can sign a new Protocol. \nMadam Speaker, the Prime Minister of India responded positively to my request \nto facilitate the upcoming travel of a Mauritian delegation, which I will lead \ntogether with the Deputy Prime Minster to the Chagos Archipelago. \nMadam Speaker, following my restricted meeting with the Prime Minister of \nIndia, there was a high-level delegation meeting during which seven Memoranda \nof Understanding and Agreements were exchanged and three others were \nannounced in numerous fields such as space research, marine science, power, \nrenewable energies, education and technological sectors.   \n(iv) Besides, the high-level strategic meeting with the Prime Minister of India, I also \nhad meetings with the President and Vice-President of India, the Minister of \nHealth and Family Welfare as well as the Leader of Opposition.  \nThese meetings served as an enabling platform for the Mauritian side to discuss \nissues of mutual interest and seek the support of the Indian Authorities on a wide \nrange of issues such as security, economic and technical cooperation as well as \ncapacity building. \nMadam Speaker, my State visit fused with “civilisational symbolism with strategic \npurpose”, if I may put it that way. It was an opportunity to project a story of enduring \ncivilisational bonds. \nSince our independence, India’s role has been instrumental as an unflinching partner in \nour development. My visit has confirmed the privileged relations between our two countries!  \nIt is a matter of great pride for our country to have become the strategic partner of a \ncountry like India, which is projected to be by 2027 the third economic power in the world. \nMadam Speaker, I take this opportunity to express my profound gratitude to the \nGovernment of India and to Shri Narendra Modi for the continued support for the \ndevelopment of Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \n\n24 \n \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, the hon. Prime Minister may not be aware but I was \ninvited by the Speaker of Parliament in India and I had met the Ministry of Foreign Affairs \nand the Vice President whom he met, and we had technical support for the live translation of \nCreole and French in Parliament.  \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Question! \nMr A. Duval: Five or six staff from the Mauritius National Assembly have been \ntrained free of charge in India. All paid for by India. \nMadam Speaker, I note that the Prime Minister… \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: One moment.  \nNow that you have said that, I can understand. Will you please put your supplementary \nquestion? \nMr A. Duval:  Yes, thank you, Madam Speaker. Madam Speaker, the hon. Prime \nMinister has replied for the Prime Minister’s Office. We note that there have been persons \nfrom state-owned enterprises who have accompanied and the Ministers, etc. May we know \nthe total cost as per the question incurred by the Government of Mauritius, including for by \nstate-owned companies on the payment of airfare, accommodation, per diem, etc.? He has \nanswered for the PMO. \nThe Prime Minister: I have answered for the government side, but for the private \nsector, they paid everything themselves. \nMadam Speaker: He was saying you just answered for PMO. You have answered for \nthe whole.  \nThe Prime Minister:  Yes. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nNow, before you put your second question…  \n(Interruptions) \nMembers, I have forgotten to tell you that the Table has been advised that PQ B/952 \nwill be replied by Dr. the hon. Prime Minister, time permitting, PQ B/911 will be replied by \n\n25 \n \nthe hon. Minister of Housing and Lands, and PQ B/913 will be replied by hon. Minister of \nInformation Technology, Communication and Innovation. \nBy the way, there is a PQ that has been withdrawn. I will tell you in a minute. \nI just want to tell you – I do not have a very good voice today. Please forgive me. \nQuestion! \nBANK OF MAURITIUS – DR. R. S, FORMER GOVERNOR – RESIGNATION \nCOMPENSATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/900",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 900,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/900) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands  whether, \nin regard to Dr. R. S., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Bank of \nMauritius (BoM), information as to the basis of the calculation of the sum of Rs5.5 million \npaid thereto as compensation on his resignation as Governor of the BoM indicating, during \nhis tenure of office, the total – \n(a) \nremuneration drawn, and \n(b) \nnumber of days spent abroad on official missions.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, as I have stated in my reply to the Private \nNotice Question of the hon. Leader of the Opposition on 07 October 2025, an amount of \nRs5.5 million is payable to Dr. Rama Sithanen following his resignation as Governor of the \nBank of Mauritius. I wish to highlight that this is not a compensation as is being alleged in \nsome quarters, but actually dues payable to him. \nI am informed by the Bank of Mauritius that the sum of Rs5.5 million includes refund \nof unutilised annual and sick leaves, encashment of accrued passage benefits, and payment of \npro-rated end of the year bonus and 3 months’ emoluments in lieu of notice. \n \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Bank of Mauritius that, \nduring his tenure of office, Dr. Sithanen has drawn a total remuneration of Rs9 million as per \nhis contract of appointment.  \nConcerning part (b) of the question, I am informed that Dr. Sithanen spent 35 days \nabroad on official missions.  \nMr A. Duval:  First question, Madam Speaker: how can someone who has resigned \nbe paid compensation payment in lieu of notice? \n\n26 \n \nThe Prime Minister: This is according to the law, Madam Speaker. Section 18 of \nthe Bank of Mauritius provides for a Governor to either give a three-month notice in case \nhe intends to resign. He did not manage to give the three-month notice but I asked him to \nresign. But in fact, in reality he was given a three-month notice. This is why it went like \nthis. \nMr A. Duval:  It does not make any sense – contractual law. \nMadam Speaker: We are not in a court of law. \nMr A. Duval: Yes. May I ask the hon. Prime Minister without passing any \njudgement on Mr Rama Sithanen in view of the serious allegations that have surfaced \nwhilst he was Governor and since he has resigned – why is it that whilst the investigation is \nongoing, decision has been taken to pay Mr Sithanen, who, if it turns out has committed \nbreaches of contract, may not be entitled to any compensation whatsoever under \ncontractual law? \nThe Prime Minister: May I ask the hon. Member if the investigation takes five \nyears, so he waits for five years? Tell me! You tell me! \nMr A. Duval: Yes, this is what happens. \nThe Prime Minister: In that case, I ask him: who do you think will want to take \nimportant positions in Mauritius if that is the way you are going to treat people? Think \nagain. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, next question! Hon. F. Quirin, yes! \n \nNADC – CEO & CHAIRPERSON - SALARIES & BENEFITS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/901",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 901,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/901) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, \nin regard to the National Agency for drug Control, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain information as to the – \n(a) \ndetails of the annual budget allocated thereto; \n(b) \nmonthly salaries and benefits drawn by the Chief Executive Officer and \nChairperson thereof, and \n(c) \namount disbursed in terms of other salaries, consultancy fees and \nadministrative overheads as at date.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, The National Agency for Drug Control \n(NADC) Act was proclaimed on 15 May 2025.  The NADC is a statutory body entrusted to \n\n27 \n \ncoordinate the national drug response through prevention, enforcement, treatment, \nrehabilitation and harm reduction.   \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that for the Financial Year \n2025/2026, an amount of Rs70 million has been allocated to the NADC. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed that – \n(a) \nthe Chief Executive Officer was appointed on 12 June 2025 and he currently \ndraws a monthly package of Rs169,350, including basic salary, salary \ncompensation, travelling allowance and telephone allowance, in addition to \ncontractual entitlements such as car benefits, passage benefits and gratuity, and \n(b) \nthe Chairperson was appointed on 16 June 2025 and he receives a monthly \nallowance of Rs40,000. \nIn regard to part (c) of the question, Madam Speaker, I am informed that as at date, a \ntotal of Rs2,246,751.05 has been disbursed.  I am tabling the information requested by the \nhon. Member. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that the NADC, being a newly created \nagency, is still in the process of transitioning into a fully established organisation. With a \nview to assisting the NADC administratively, 10 officers of my Office are providing support \nto the CEO in the fields of Administration, Finance, Human Resource, Procurement and \nAccommodation. \nMeanwhile, to empower the Agency to fulfil its mandate optimally, a recruitment \nexercise for seven core posts such as Administrative Manager and Coordinators is ongoing.  \nThe posts were advertised on 03 October 2025 with a closing date on 23 October 2025.  \n A total of 144 applications for all the posts has been received.  Interviews will be \nconducted from 03 to 07 November 2025.  \nIn addition, the NADC has already identified premises to set up its office, and \nprocedures for finalising the lease agreement are underway. \nMadam Speaker, I must point out that my Office has received a number of \nrepresentations from NGOs as well as from independent persons regarding the performance \nof the NADC and the lack of coordination of efforts sur le terrain.  In fact, as I said, it is a \nnew agency. It must start doing… It takes time to do all these. \nBut, in fact, Government is not, I cannot say that we are totally satisfied with the way \nthe Agency has been operating, and we intend to take remedial actions to improve its \neffectiveness in the days to come. \n\n28 \n \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Quirin! \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. L’honorable Premier ministre peut-il dire à \nla Chambre suite aux doutes exprimés par plusieurs travailleurs sociaux, des ONG et même \npar le Junior Minister, hon. Kugan Parapen, concernant les compétences et la capacité du \nprésident Sam Lauthan à s’adapter aux réalités actuelles, s’il compte le remplacer à la tête de \ncette agence comme cela a était fait récemment au sein d’autres institutions ? \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister! \nThe Prime Minister: This is a sensitive post, I can tell the hon. Member, it is very \ndifficult to find people who are actually ready do that job. \nMr Quirin: Il y en a ! \nThe Prime Minister : Il y en a ? Mais quand on prend contact avec eux, ils s’en vont, \nc’est trop dangereux.  \nMr Quirin : Je peux vous donner des listes. \nThe Prime Minister: Maybe you will be prepared to do it? \nMr Quirin: Not me. I am a Member of the National Assembly. \nThe Prime Minister: No, but maybe you will want to do it. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Blabla fasil sa. \nMr Quirin: Blabla, mo pu donn twa nom la. \nThe Prime Minister: It is not easy. If you have names, give us the names. We will \nconsider. \nMr Quirin: Yes, I will give you! \nMadam Speaker: Okay, your next question please. Do you have more supplementary? \nYes? \nMr Quirin: No, no, next question, please. \nGENERAL ELECTIONS – LAW AMENDMENTS – MAURITIAN DIASPORA – \nRIGHT TO VOTE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/902",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 902,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/902) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nNational Assembly Elections, he will state if Government proposes to amend the legislation \n\n29 \n \naiming at allowing Mauritian nationals living abroad the right to vote therefor and, if so, give \ndetails thereof and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I wish to refer the hon. Member to the reply I \nmade to PQ B/816 on 07 October 2025. As I had indicated then, Government is currently \nworking on the setting up of a Constitutional Review Commission tasked to come up with the \nrecommendations on several constitutional, electoral and governance reforms, which will \ninclude among others, the revision of our electoral system to better reflect the will of the \npeople, to also look at the way elections have been run, especially by the MSM, and also to \nrevitalise our democratic principles. \nThe question of bringing legislative amendments to allow Mauritian nationals living \nabroad to vote, I am all for it, but it has wide-ranging implications. These will be examined \nby the Constitutional Review Commission that will be set up shortly. \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente, l’honorable Premier ministre peut-il indiquer à la \nChambre si à l’heure actuelle son bureau dispose de données sur le nombre de Mauriciens \nvivant à l’étranger qui pourraient être éligibles à voter ? \nThe Prime Minister: As I said, the wide implications. We are looking at it but in some \ncountries, it is going to be very difficult, I must say straightaway.  We already know this. In \nsome countries, it would be very, very difficult to organise. In other countries, not so. So, we \nwill be looking at all this. \nMadam Speaker: He wanted to know if you have figures, which I doubt. \nThe Prime Minister: No. \nMadam Speaker: You don’t? He does not. \nThe Prime Minister: … some figures. \nMr Quirin: Mais, dans ce cas-là, êtes-vous disposé, M. le Premier ministre, à procéder \nà un recensement ? \nThe Prime Minister: No, I should have replied to this. No, we are looking at the \nfigures. In some countries, it is even difficult to get the figures. This is why we do not have \nthe total number. \nMadam Speaker: Some people have double nationality. That is why it is complicated \nto actually find out but very interesting issue.  \n\n30 \n \nAnyway, next question from hon. Lobine! \nSYNTHETIC DRUGS – ILLEGAL USE & TRAFFICKING – CANNABIS \nDEPENALISATION PLAN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/903",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 903,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/903) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the illegal use, \nconsumption and trafficking of synthetic drugs, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Commissioner of Police, information as to – \n(a) \nthe number of suspects arrested and provisionally charged therefor since January \n2025 to date, indicating the – \n(i) \nnumber thereof being minors, and  \n(ii) \nquantity seized; \n(b) \nthe measures envisaged to combat same, and \n(c) \nwhether consideration will be given for the formulation of a national action plan \nand holding of a debate on whether to depenalise the use of cannabis for \nconsumption purpose only.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: With regard to part (a) of the question, Madam Speaker, I am \ninformed by the Commissioner of Police that from January 2025 to 23 October 2025, 974 \nsuspects have been arrested in connection with synthetic drugs as follows – \n• \n446 adults for consumption. Of these, 232 were provisionally charged, 119 opted \nfor rehabilitation through the Drug Users Administrative Panel under the Ministry \nof Health and Wellness, and 95 had no provisional charge lodged; \n• \n22 adults for drug trafficking, all were provisionally charged; \n• \n497 adults for drug dealing and all were provisionally charged, and \n• \n9 minors for drug dealing and none were provisionally charged. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (a)(ii) of the question, I am tabling the quantities of \nsynthetic drugs seized. \nRegarding part (b) of the question, I am informed that the Police has strengthened \nenforcement, cooperation and preventive actions to combat drugs, including synthetic drugs. \nMeasures include enhanced intelligence gathering and profiling of suspects, drug mapping to \ndetect hotspots, aggressive crackdowns in drug-prone areas with the support of specialised \n\n31 \n \nunits, use of drones for surveillance and detection of illicit plantations, reinforcement of \nADSU’s resources, and daily patrols in high-risk areas. \nMoreover, with a view to disrupting drug and other criminal network, ADSU is \ncollaborating closely with other law enforcement and regulatory bodies, including the MRA-\nCustoms Anti-Narcotics Section, the Financial Crimes Commission, the Ministry of Health \nand Wellness and the Financial Intelligence Unit. \nADSU has strengthened regional partnerships with Reunion Island, India, Seychelles, \nMozambique, Madagascar, Kenya, South Africa and Tanzania through intelligence gathering, \nsharing of the intelligence, tracking of suspects, controlled deliveries and exchange of best \npractices, which have helped curb the movement of synthetic drugs through maritime and air \nroutes. \nAt the international level, ADSU collaborates with the United Nations Office on Drugs \nand Crime (UNODC), the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the UK National \nCrime Agency (NCA), Interpol and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) for \nintelligence-sharing, capacity-building, cross-border investigations and financial tracing, \nthereby strengthening national efforts to combat transnational drug trafficking networks. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (c) of the question, I am informed by the Chief \nExecutive Officer of the National Agency for Drug Control (NADC) that, in line with its \nmandate to support evidence-based policy decisions, the fourth meeting of the Drug Control \nBoard considered the current national and international policy approaches on the regulation \nof cannabis. The discussion examined three technical models, namely – \n(i) \ndecriminalisation, whereby use/possession remains illegal but sanctions shift \nfrom criminal penalties to administrative penalties with no criminal record for the \noffender; \n(ii) \ndepenalisation, whereby cannabis use and possession remains a criminal offence \nwith reduced criminal sanctions, and \n(iii) regulated legalisation, whereby use/possession becomes legal under appropriate \nregulations. \nFollowing deliberations, the Board agreed unanimously that a deeper, context-specific \ntechnical assessment is necessary for Mauritius. To this end, a Technical Committee will be \nset up to conduct a comprehensive review and submit a report covering, inter alia – \n \nthe projected economic impact of each model; \n\n32 \n \n \nthe resource implications for the scaling-up of prevention, treatment and harm-\nreduction services that must accompany any such reforms; \n \nthe recommended policy option for consideration by NADC, based on technical \nfeasibility, public health outcomes and social equity parameters, and \n \nthe specific legal drafting required for the implementation of the selected model \nunder the Mauritian legal framework. \nThe Technical Committee will be chaired by the CEO of the Agency and will comprise \nexperts in public health, the criminal justice system, fiscal policy, neuroscience, addiction \nmedicine, harm reduction as well as representatives of the Ministry of Health and Wellness. \nThe Board expects to receive the findings of the Committee within the next quarter to \nguide the next phase of their action. \nThe issue, Madam Speaker, remains complex and will require careful and thorough \nexamination from all relevant perspectives.  We are treading very cautiously to ensure that \nany decision taken is evidence-based and will, under no circumstances, impact negatively on \nour public health, our youth, and our national values.   \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue, hon. Caserne! \nPREROGATIVE OF MERCY COMMISSION – COMPOSITION OF BOARD",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/904",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 904,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/904) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Commission on the Prerogative of Mercy, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain information as to the current composition thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the Commission on the Prerogative of Mercy is \nestablished in accordance with section 75(2) of the Constitution and consists of a Chairperson \nand not less than two other members appointed by the President, acting in his own deliberate \njudgment. \n The President of the Republic has, accordingly, appointed Mr Hamuth, G.C.S.K. – he \nis a former Judge – as the Chairperson of the Commission on Prerogative of Mercy with \neffect from 10 October 2025 for a term of office of two years.  The other members of the \nCommission are – \n\n33 \n \n(i) \nMrs Seetharamboo; \n(ii) \nMs Suhashinee Bachun, and \n(iii) Mr Vassist Rao Luchmaya. \nThey have also been appointed for a term of office of two years with effect from 10 \nOctober. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes? \nMr Caserne: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. Maybe not for now, if the hon. Prime \nMinister can table the number of pending cases before that Commission for next Sitting \nplease? \nMadam Speaker: Pending cases? \nMr Caserne: Pending cases. \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, they will be looking at all the cases before them. \nMadam Speaker: No, he wants you to table, but it does not arise from your question. \nYou can still ask on a friendly basis but it does not arise from the question.  \nNext question, hon. Etwareea! \n \nDEVELOPMENT BANK OF MAURITIUS LTD. – RECRUITMENT POLICY 2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/905",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 905,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/905) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre D'or) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nDevelopment Bank of Mauritius Ltd., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom \ninformation as to the – \n(a) \nrecruitment policy thereof in 2024 prior to the last General Elections, and \n(b) \nofficial missions undertaken by the former Chief Executive Officer since 2015 to \n2024, giving details thereof, including cost of airfares, accommodation, transport \nand per diem allowance paid.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, it is clear that the policy of the previous \nGovernment was to recruit at any cost in order to win the elections and recruitment at the \nDevelopment Bank of Mauritius Ltd (DBM) is such a blatant case, Madam Speaker.  Such a \nblatant case! \n\n34 \n \n The DBM has recruited 102 additional staff between September 2023 to November \n2024. This represents an increase of almost 45%, bringing the overall staffing to 333.  \nLet me stress, Madam Speaker, that this practice cut across several public institutions, \nnot just this one, leading to inefficiencies, disruption of their proper functioning and \nfrustration of those who are already there. Suddenly they saw a horde of people coming up, \ngoing on top of their head, getting better pay and no results. This is what the MSM did to this \ncountry. \nWith respect to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the DBM Ltd, that the former \nChief Executive Officers undertook 28 official missions from 2015 to 2024, at a total cost of \nRs1,464,211, comprising air tickets and per diem (including accommodation and transport), \nas follows – \ni. \nMr Bardwazsingh Jokhoo, Acting Managing Director/Managing Director, from \n14 August 2015 to 03 April 2018, undertook 1 SADC mission and 5 missions to \nRodrigues. The total amount paid was Rs453,992, of which, per diem was \nRs422,971 and cost of air ticket was Rs31,021. \nii. \nLate Mr Lobine Dayha Unmole, Managing Director, from 04 April 2018 to 31 \nMarch 2020, undertook 4 SADC missions and 8 missions to Rodrigues. The total \namount paid was Rs539,273, of which, per diem was Rs356,013 and cost of air \ntickets was Rs183,260. \niii. \nMr Jaywant Pandoo, Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer, from 01 April \n2020 to December 2024, undertook 1 SADC mission and 9 missions to \nRodrigues. The total amount paid was Rs470,946, of which, per diem paid was \nRs361,740 and cost of air ticket Rs109,206. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister.  \nTime is up! Time is up! I am sorry! \nI have a few questions which have been withdrawn: PQs B/906, B/907, B/908, B/912, \nB/914, and B/952. Thank you very much everyone.  \nNow, we go to questions addressed to hon. Ministers.  \n\n35 \n \nHon. Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles, Dr. Ms Daureeawo! \nPERINATAL MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES – PAST 3 YEARS STATISTICS & \nSUPPORTING MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/906",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 906,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/906) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nAdvisers whose services were retained by the former Prime Minister, he will state the names \nand pay packages thereof, including the boards on which they equally served over the period \n2015 to November 2024.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBANK CHARGES, FEES & COLLATERAL SECURITIES – REVIEW & GLOBAL \nSTANDARDS ALIGNMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/907",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 907,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/907) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the bank charges, fees and collateral securities regarding loans granted by financial \ninstitutions, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Bank of Mauritius, \ninformation as to – \n(a) \nwhen same were last reviewed, and  \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given to aligning same to international norms and \nstandards applicable in other jurisdictions.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMR M.R. – MAURITIAN ASSETS, TRAVELS – POTENTIAL INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/908",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 908,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/908) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mr M.R., he will \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a)  the number of assets acquired by him in Mauritius, indicating the year of his \ninitial investment;  \n\n130 \n \n(b)  the number of times he travelled to Mauritius, indicating whether due diligence \nwas carried out thereon, and  \n(c)  whether consideration will be given for the setting up of a Board of Inquiry to \nshed light on his recent arrival in Mauritius.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nNATIONAL MULTIDIMENSIONAL POVERTY INDEX – POLICY \nINTEGRATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/909",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 909,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/909) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the development of a National Multidimensional Poverty Index (NMPI) for \nMauritius in collaboration with the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and \nwithin the framework of the SADC Regional Strategy for Statistics, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from Statistics Mauritius, information as to the actions being taken or \nenvisaged to – \n(a)  facilitate same whilst ensuring that the NMPI benefits policymaking, and  \n(b)    integrate the NMPI into the national budget planning and allocation framework.",
      "answer": "Reply: With regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by Statistics Mauritius \nthat under the SADC Protocol on Statistics, Member States are required to develop and \ndisseminate a National Multidimensional Poverty Index. \nThis index assesses poverty through a broader lens than just income deprivation.  It \ntakes into account multiple aspects that influence human development, such as education, \nhealth, living standards, and access to essential services like electricity, clean water, and \nadequate housing. \nMauritius does not have a National Multidimensional Poverty Index.  The only poverty \nmeasures being compiled and used are the Relative Poverty Line and the World Bank \nInternational Poverty Line.  All of these measures are based on income only.   \nHowever, Statistics Mauritius does collect information on non-income sources of \npoverty that are reflected in the Relative Development Index. But the National \nMultidimensional Poverty Index proposed by SADC covers a much wider spectrum of \ndimensions.  In line with Government’s policy to lift up the standard of living of the \npopulation, we are pursuing all efforts to develop such a country-specific index for Mauritius. \n\n131 \n \nIn this regard, Statistics Mauritius has sought technical assistance from SADC through \nconsultancy services from the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative.  Our aim \nis to build local capacity in the development of such an index. \nAs regards actions being taken on this project, I wish to inform the House that officers \nfrom SADC and the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative visited Mauritius \nduring the week of 13 to 17 October this year.  These officers, together with Statistics \nMauritius, have carried out the following activities – \n(a) \nFirst, a training session on the subject was held with technical officers of \nStatistics Mauritius and other relevant institutions;  \n(b) \nSecond, a working session was conducted with senior officials from key line \nministries; \n(c) \nThird, the officers participated in the Symposium on Poverty organised by the \nMinistry of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity to gather \nvaluable feedbacks from a broader audience, and \n(d) \nFourth, a consultative session was organised with some Members of the National \nAssembly to sensitise them on the benefits of the Multidimensional Poverty Index \nFramework. \nThe next step is to train the technical staff of Statistics Mauritius on the methodology, \ncomputation, and analysis of the index.  This phase of the technical assistance will start as \nfrom January 2026.   \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, we will definitely integrate the index into the \nnational framework for policy-making, budget planning and the allocation of resources.   \nThis is in line with our commitment and determination to deal with the problem of \npoverty in all its forms. I am convinced that the index will be a powerful tool to achieve this \ngoal and to realise our vision of a New Social Order. \nPOLICE HELICOPTER SQUADRON – HELICOPTER FLEET & \nPERSONNEL",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/910",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 910,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/910) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nPolice Helicopter Squadron, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to – \n\n132 \n \n(a) \nthe number of helicopters currently available thereat, indicating the number of \nqualified and licensed pilots presently authorised to operate same;  \n(b) \nwhether Government proposes to increase the number of helicopters within its \nfleet and, if so, the number thereof and expected timeline therefor,  \n(c) \nwhether the recruitment of additional personnel, including pilots, maintenance \nstaff and technical officers, is being envisaged.",
      "answer": "Reply: The Police Helicopter Squadron (PHS) was established in 1974 through a Police \nStanding Order No. 102 as a unit of the Mauritius Police Force and is responsible for the \noperation and management of Police Helicopters. \nAs regards part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that \nthe current fleet of the Police Helicopter Squadron comprises 8 helicopters as follows – \n \n3 Dhruv Helicopters; \n \n1 Fennec Helicopter, and \n \n4 Chetak Helicopters. \n2 helicopters, 1 Fennec and 1 Dhruv from the fleet are currently undergoing major \noverhaul in Airbus South Africa and in Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, India, respectively. \nI am further informed that there are presently 10 qualified and trained pilots posted to \nthe Police Helicopter Squadron, including 2 Indian Air Force Officers on deputation to the \nGovernment of Mauritius. They are all licensed and authorised to operate the Police \nHelicopters. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that the present fleet of 8 \nhelicopters adequately meets the Police operational requirements. It is therefore not \nenvisaged, at this stage, to increase the number of helicopters. \nHowever, in view of the ageing and the unavailability of maintenance support for the \nChetak Helicopters beyond 2035, a replacement plan is being implemented whereby 4 Light \nUtility Helicopters will be acquired to replace the Chetak fleet under an Indian Special \nEconomic Grant Package. As per the plan, 1 helicopter will be inducted in 2029, 2 in 2030, \nand the remaining in 2031 along with the gradual decommissioning of the Chetak \nHelicopters. \nAs regards part (c) of the question, recruitment of Cadet Officers (Graduates – Flying \nBranch, PHS) is carried out by the Disciplined Forces Service Commission. The last \nrecruitment exercise was undertaken in 2022. On 25 August 2025, the Commissioner of \n\n133 \n \nPolice has recommended the enlistment of one trainee Cadet Officer to be trained overseas \nand locally as pilot. \nI am further informed by the Commissioner of Police that, as at 23 October 2025, there \nare 107 technicians posted at the PHS. The technicians are responsible for routine \nmaintenance of the helicopters and their peripherals.  Each year, an average of 8 suitable \nPolice Officers are selected and trained locally as well as overseas to be posted at the PHS for \nmaintenance duties. \nLES SALINES – NEOTOWN PROJECT – COMPENSATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/911",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 911,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/911) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the early \ntermination of the contract for the lease of lands earmarked for the Neotown project at Les \nSalines, he will state the amount of compensation paid therefor, indicating – \n(a) \nthe circumstances which led to such payment, and  \n(b) \nwhether payment was made pursuant to an out-of-court settlement or \nfollowing an award by an Arbitration Tribunal.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Housing and Lands (Mr S. Mohamed): In December 2009, my \nMinistry signed a 99-year lease agreement with Les Salines Development Ltd, a company set \nup in Mauritius by Patel Engineering Ltd (India), in respect of a plot of land of an extent of \n58A33P in the Port Area at Les Salines, Port Louis, for the purpose of implementing a \nWaterfront Development Project, commonly known as the Neotown Project. \nIn February 2015, the then Government decided to terminate the lease agreement for \nfailure by the company to make any significant progress in the development of the project in \naccordance with the lease agreement. \nIn December 2023, the Arbitral Tribunal, set up to adjudicate the dispute between Patel \nEngineering Ltd and the State of Mauritius, awarded an amount of about Rs1.35 billion as \ncompensation to Patel Engineering Ltd, together with interest at PLIBOR + 2% until \npayment, plus costs. \nI am advised by the Attorney-General’s Office that no further information may be given \nconcerning the arbitration as parties are required to maintain confidentiality as to all aspects \nof the arbitration. \n \n \n\n134 \n \nSPECIAL STRIKING TEAM – INITIATED ENQUIRIES – CASES’ DETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/912",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 912,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/912) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port-Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the defunct Special Striking Team (SST) set up in August 2022, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the number \nof – \n(a)  enquiries initiated by the SST until its dissolution, indicating the number thereof \non alleged cases illegal drug trafficking or drug offences;  \n(b)  cases that involved seizure of money on premises during intervention, and  \n(c)  cases discontinued for lack of evidence.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS SUSPENSION – 01 NOVEMBER 2024 – REASONS \n& IMPACT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/913",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 913,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/913) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the suspension of the social media platforms on 01 November 2024 in Mauritius, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the – \n(a) \nreasons therefor and under whose directives same was carried out, and  \n(b) \neconomic and social impact thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCASINOS OF MAURITIUS – PROPOSED RESTRUCTURING – TIMEFRAME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/914",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 914,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/914) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the proposed restructuring of the Casinos of Mauritius, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to the expected timeframe for the implementation thereof, \ngiving details thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n\n135 \n \nRODRIGUES – PORT MATHURIN PORT AREA – DEVELOPMENT WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/915",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 915,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/915) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Port Mathurin \nPort Area, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Ports Authority – \n(a) \ninformation as to the development works, if any, currently being undertaken \nthereat and, if so – \n(i) \ngive details thereof, and \n(ii) \nindicate whether these works have been subject to an Environmental Impact \nAssessment, Preliminary Environmental Report or Strategic Environmental \nAssessment and to table copies thereof, and \n(b) \ncopy of the Port Mathurin Port Master Plan 2024 or its Executive Summary, \nincluding details of its infrastructural requirements and table same.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Acting Director-General of the Mauritius Ports Authority \nthat the latter organisation is presently not undertaking any development works at Port \nMathurin. \nHowever, I presume the hon. Member is referring to upgrading works of the slipway at \nPort Mathurin, carried out by the Mauritius Ports Authority and completed on 12 September \n2025. This slipway, which was constructed in the year 1990, plays an essential role for the \nmaintenance and repair of vessels, including the two tugs of the Mauritius Ports Authority \noperating thereat.  \nThere was a need to carry out these upgrading works with a view to improving the \nsafety and operational efficiency of the facility. \nWith regards to part (a) (i) of the question, I am informed that the contract to replace \npart of the rail used to haul the vessels, was awarded on 19 March 2025 at the quoted price of \nRs6,817,200 inclusive of VAT. \nWith regard to part (a) (ii) of the question, such upgrading work is not a listed \nundertaking under the Sixth Schedule of the Environment Act. Accordingly, no Environment \nImpact Assessment, Preliminary Environmental Report or Strategic Environmental \nAssessment was required.  \nAs regards part (b) of the question, the Executive Summary of the Port Master Plan \n2024 for Port Mathurin recommending an investment of approximately Rs4.6 billion for the \nconstruction of a new commercial quay and associated terminal facilities in order to cater for \nthe medium and long-term requirements is being placed in the Library of the National \n\n136 \n \nAssembly. The new development would include, inter-alia, the construction of a 175-metre-\nlong commercial quay, dredging and reclamation, terminal pavement, utilities, lighting, port \nadministration and passenger terminal building. \n Government is deeply committed to develop the ports, including that of Port Mathurin \nwith a view to increasing the competitiveness of our economy. In line with paragraph 71 of \nthe Government Programme, there will be a total revamping of the port and other \ninfrastructure. The recommendations of this Plan would accordingly be considered in this \nmodernisation process. \nFREEDOM OF INFORMATION BILL – INTRODUCTION – WIDE PUBLIC \nCIRCULATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/916",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 916,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/916) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the proposed \nintroduction of a Freedom of Information Bill in the Assembly, as announced in the \nGovernment Programme 2025-2029, he will state where matters stand, indicating if \nconsideration will be given for the wide public circulation thereof prior thereto.",
      "answer": "Reply: As announced in the Government Programme 2024-2029, a Freedom of \nInformation Act will be introduced to provide for more transparency in relation to the \ndecisions of public institutions. \nI wish to apprise the House that my Government stands firmly by its commitment to \ncome up with a Freedom of Information Act. However, the House will appreciate that a \nFreedom of Information Act is a complex and far-reaching piece of legislation, with \nsignificant legal and administrative implications. It is, therefore, important that such a piece \nof legislation be developed with due diligence and careful consideration. \nI am informed by the Attorney-General’s Office that exploratory work for the drafting \nof the Freedom of Information Bill has been initiated, which includes comparative research \ninto the models adopted by other jurisdictions, particularly in small island developing states \nand countries of the Sub-Saharan African region. It is also worth highlighting that a previous \nworking draft of such a Bill is being reviewed by the Attorney-General’s Office in light of \nrecent developments both locally and internationally.  \nThe House may wish to note that drafting of such an important Bill cannot be done in \nisolation. The Freedom of Information Bill is closely linked to the work of the Constitutional \nReview Commission, whose establishment is imminent. The Constitutional Review \nCommission’s mandate will include the review and strengthening of fundamental rights, \n\n137 \n \nincluding new-generation rights relating to technology, privacy, and access to information. It \nis, therefore, essential that the constitutional framework first provide clear recognition and \nscope for this right, so that any ensuing legislation, such as the Freedom of Information Act, \nrests on a sound constitutional foundation.  \nThe House will surely appreciate that both the recommendations of the Constitutional \nReview Commission and the proposal for a Freedom of Information Bill will entail wide and \ninclusive consultations with all relevant stakeholders, civil society, the media, and public \ninstitutions. \nMSAW – DOGS MICROCHIPPING – BIDDERS, CONTRACT & PROCUREMENT \nCOST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/917",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 917,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/917) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to mothers \nexperiencing severe perinatal mental health issues, he will state the – \n(a) \nreported number thereof over the past three years, and  \n(b) \nmeasures put in place to support these mothers.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that the mental condition of \npregnant women is investigated once patient has mental health issues or shows obvious signs \nof distress that demand immediate attention. I am informed that over the past three years a \ntotal of 117 mothers has been reported to be experiencing severe perinatal mental health \nissues. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, my Ministry recognises the impact of perinatal \nmental health issues on both the mother and child. To support these mothers, various \nmeasures are already in place. Mothers suffering from perinatal mental health issues are \ncatered by a multi-disciplinary team, comprising obstetricians and gynaecologists, \npsychiatrics, clinical psychologists, medical social workers and community psychiatric \nnurses. The multi-disciplinary team provides assessment treatment and ongoing monitoring \nduring pregnancy and post-delivery.   \nDuring pregnancy, the maternal treatment is concurrently done by both the obstetrician \nand psychiatrist. In case there is further management, the mothers are referred to psychiatrists \nand psychologists for counselling, and these health professionals address the initial phase of \nanxiety and mental health concern during and after the pregnancy as part of their follow-up. \nMothers with severe symptoms are admitted in ward for stabilisation and treatment. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that in case of mothers suffering from severe \nperinatal mental issues, the new born babies are kept in the nursery for care and feeding \nunder the supervision of trained nurses in Neonatal Intensive Care Units. The mothers are \nalso encouraged to come to the nursery to breastfeed them, and extraction of the mother’s \nmilk is carried for mothers who are unable to breastfeed their babies due to their health \nconditions.  \n\n36 \n \nFurthermore, once the mothers are discharged from the hospital, the medical social \nservices assign a trained care giver to carry out home visits so as to assist the mother and \nother family members in the upbringing of the baby at home. The medical social worker may \nalso liaise with the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family Welfare on a case-to-case basis. \nIn addition, the new born babies are followed by a paediatrician to ensure optimal care and \nsafety of the baby, and community nurses specialised in psychiatrics also pay visits to the \nmothers. \nMadam Speaker, as a caring government, my Ministry remains committed to \nstrengthening perinatal mental health services through early intervention, integrated support \nand continuous monitoring to ensure the wellness of both the mothers and the babies. \nMadam Speaker: Dr. Aumeer, please! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, hon. Minister. It is very well-known that postpartum period \nrepresents a very difficult time for mothers who have delivered. Sometimes, the services \nprovided at our hospitals are not in line with what is expected to support them. May I request \nthe hon. Minister to consider having a walk-in service well after they are discharged from the \nhospital, particularly given that we have quite a percentage of women who suffer from mental \nproblems well after having delivered? Thank you. \nMr Bachoo: I take note of this request, but I would like to remind the hon. Member of \nthe limited number of gynaecologists as well as specialists in our medical field. However, in \nthe months to come, probably, we are going to recruit additional specialists for that purpose. \nMadam Speaker: I am sorry, but postpartum would not be gynaecologist. Would it be? \nDr. Aumeer: Both gynaecologists and psychiatrists. \nMr Bachoo: Psychiatrists. \nMadam Speaker: I thought it was more there. Okay, thank you. \nI just have to remind everyone that we have questions which have been withdrawn. \nB/918 has been withdrawn. PQ B/934 will be replied by hon. Minister of Health and \nWellness.  \nSo, now, hon. Ms Anquetil! \n\n37 \n \nENTREPRENEURSHIP AWARENESS PROGRAMMES – YEARLY \nORGANISATIONS & BENEFICIARIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/918",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 918,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives",
      "question": "(No. B/918) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives whether, in regard to the \nEntrepreneurship Awareness Programmes, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \nSME Mauritius Ltd., information as to the number thereof held on a yearly basis, over the \npast two years, indicating in each case the number of beneficiaries who benefited from \nfacilities therefrom.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSAINT-JEAN CEMETERY – DAMAGED TOMBS BY FLOODING – \nRESTORATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/919",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 919,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/919) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the 300 tombs at the Saint-\nJean Cemetery which were damaged during the floods which occurred between 08 November \n2023 and 15 January 2024, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the \ncurrent state thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, I am informed that as per records available at my \nMinistry, following the flooding which occurred in the region of Saint-Jean Cemetery \nwhereby, amongst others, several tombs were damaged, a meeting was held on 13 November \n2023 under the chair of Mgr Durhône at l’Evêché de Port Louis in the presence of the then \nMinister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change, the then Mayor of \nthe Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes, the representatives of the Ministry of Health and \nWellness, the National Development Unit and the Land Drainage Authority, during which \nseveral decisions were agreed to and including a committee chaired by the then Minister of \nEnvironment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change, comprising all concerned \nstakeholders would meet initially on a weekly basis at the seat of the l’Evêché to monitor the \nprogress of the works. \nDuring subsequent weekly meetings chaired by the then Minister of Environment, Solid \nWaste Management and Climate Change, the Parish of Saint-Jean requested for an \nassessment of damages caused to the tombs and the rehabilitation and repairs of the tombs in \n\n38 \n \nthe cemetery to be undertaken. Unfortunately, nothing was done and was left unattended by \nthe previous government despite several appeal made by the Parish of Saint-Jean.  \nFurthermore, in his reply to a PNQ on 14 November 2023, the then Minister of \nNational Infrastructure and Community Development informed that the cleaning of the tombs \nand cemetery would be undertaken by the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste \nManagement and Climate Change and Mauri-Facilities Ltd. but still nothing was done. \nMadam Speaker, in view of the high emotional and cultural significance relating to the \nloss of loved ones and considering the humanitarian dimension of the problem, I chaired a \nmeeting at my Ministry on 16 October 2025 with Dr. hon. Boolell, Minister of Agro-Industry, \nFood Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries, hon. Veda Baloomoody, the Deputy Speaker, \nhon. Ms Anquetil, the Government Chief Whip, the Parish of Saint-Jean, the Ministry of \nLocal Government, the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate \nChange, the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes and the National Development Unit to see \nthe way forward to address the issues with regard to the tombs, which were damaged during \nthe floods. \nMadam Speaker, during our discussions at the meeting, the representatives from the \nParish of Saint-Jean informed that a total of 512 tombs were damaged, of which, 71 were \ncritically impacted, 141 tombs partially damaged and 300 tombs with minor damages or with \nmissing ornaments. The Parish further informed that last year a Rehabilitation and Repair \nPlan was prepared, following a survey carried out by its Quantity Surveyor, Architects and \nEngineers for the repair of the 512 tombs and the reinforcement of three walls around the \nperimeter of Saint Jean Church. The plan with detailed cost was submitted to the previous \ngovernment but, again, unfortunately, no positive response was given to the Parish despite \nsuccessive reminders. \nMadam Speaker, we are not heartless as the previous government. I am pleased to \nannounce that this Government has approved the funding for the repairs of the damaged \ntombs as well as the reinforcement of the three walls around the perimeter of the church. \nMadam Speaker, the works will be undertaken by the Parish of Saint Jean, being given \nthat each tomb has its own specificity. The Parish has also confirmed the duration of the \nworks to be six to eight months.  \n\n39 \n \nMadam Speaker, I am again meeting the representative of the Parish of Saint Jean this \nThursday 30 October 2025 at 11.30 hours together with my three colleagues of the \nConstituency No. 18 to pursue our dialogue.  \nMadam Speaker, I am also glad that before the All-Saints’ Day 2025, the Government \nhas agreed to do needful to enable the rehabilitation and repairs of the tombs. \nMs Anquetil: Madame la présidente, je suis profondément émue par la réponse du \nministre. À quatre jours de la Toussaint, ce gouvernement rétablit dignité et respect au \ndéfunts touchés par les inondations de 2023-2024. Le ministre pourrait-il indiqué à la \nChambre si son ministère envisage d’accélérer les procédures afin que ces trois cent familles \npuissent dans les meilleurs délais se recueillir dignement sur les tombes de leurs proches ? Je \nvous remercie, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: M. le ministre! \nMr Gunness: Madam Speaker, as I have said, this Government is a government which \nhas a heart. Government has approved only Friday last to do good, to go for the funding of \nthe repairs and rehabilitation of the tombs.  \nNow, together with the MPs of the Constituency, we are going to make sure that the \nnecessary funds be made available to the Parish and it is up to the Parish to do the work. \nMadam Speaker: Au plus vite ! C’est dans quelques jours ! \nNext question, Second Member for Savanne and Black River! \nCHEMIN GRENIER – MAIN ROAD REPAIRS – CONTRACTOR – FAST-\nTRACKING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/920",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 920,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/920) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the current state of the main road \nat Chemin Grenier, particularly the stretch from the taxi stand to the Farmers Service Centre, \nhe will state – \n(a)  the name of the contractor or body having carried out civil works thereat, \nindicating whether it has been notified to reinstate the road to its former state, and  \n(b)  if consideration will be given to fast-tracking the necessary repairs to minimize \nrisks to road users and residents. \n\n40",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, the Chemin Grenier Road B10 is a classified road \nlinking several villages namely Surinam, Riambel, Chemin Grenier and Rivière des Galets. \nThe Central Water Authority had requested wayleave from the Road Development Authority \nin July 2024 for the renewal of its pipeline along the main road at Chemin Grenier, from the \nFarmers Service Centre, Camp Charlot to Jumbo Road, over a total length of about 3.28 km. \nThe RDA had, accordingly issued a Letter of Intent and, subsequently, wayleave was granted \nin August 2024, subject to several conditions.  \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Ministry \nof Energy and Public Utilities that the CWA undertook pipe laying works through its in-house \nteam as part of its ongoing pipe replacement programme. The works involved the laying of \n160 mm diameter high density polyethylene pipes on both sides of the main road, one section \nextending from the Taxi Stand to Winners and the other from the Taxi Stand to the Farmers \nService Centre, covering a total length of approximately 1.2 km. The works started on 21 \nAugust 2024 and were completed in October 2024. Temporary reinstatement of the road \nsurface was carried out, concurrently, with the pipe laying works by Probuild Contracts Ltd. \nHowever, due to deterioration of temporary reinstatement at certain locations, Pride \nCivil Engineering Contractor Ltd was engaged by CWA on two separate occasions, namely, \nduring the end of year festive period in 2024 and prior to the Maha Shivaratree Festival in \n2025 to undertake remedial reinstatement works and ensure accessibility and safety for both \nvehicular and pedestrian traffic. I wish to highlight that following several road inspections, \nthe RDA observed that the temporary reinstatement works were in an unacceptable condition \nwith surface settlements and exposed crusher run posing safety risk to road users.  \nConsequently, the RDA issued several notices to CWA, requesting the latter to \nimmediately reinstate all trenches with asphaltic concrete in line with the conditions of \nwayleave.  \nMadam Speaker, as regard part (b) of the question, as the CWA failed to comply with \nthe conditions of wayleave, the RDA initiated procedures for the forfeiture of the CWA’s \nbank guarantee to enable it to carry out the repair works instead. This was subsequently put \non hold after the CWA indicated on 05 September 2025 that the bid document for the \npermanent road reinstatement contract had been finalised and was expected to be launched by \nend of September 2025. However, I note with deep concern that we are now at the end of \nOctober 2025 and the bid has still not been launched. I shall be taking up this matter with my \n\n41 \n \ncolleague, the hon. Minister of Energy and Public Utilities, to determine the way forward for \nthe reinstatement of the works. \nMadam Speaker, as I have indicated in previous replies, namely for PQ B/616 on 08 \nJuly 2025 and for PQ B/859 on 07 October 2025, the RDA has proposed a Memorandum of \nUnderstanding with the CWA whereby the RDA would undertake the permanent \nreinstatement works once the pipelaying is fully completed and commissioned. The MoU will \ndefine their respective responsibilities and payment arrangements between both parties. A \nmeeting was held on 07 October 2025 at the level of my Ministry with the concerned \nstakeholders during which it was agreed that the Ministry of Energy and Public Utilities and \nthe CWA will jointly review the draft MoU. A follow up meeting would be scheduled within \nthe coming weeks to finalise the arrangements. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! Supplementary! \nMr Jugurnauth: Will the hon. Minister inform the House that the project will be \ncarried before the opening of the market fair at Chemin Grenier which is scheduled on 15 of \nDecember? \nMadam Speaker: Short and sweet! \nMr Gunness: As I said, I will liaise with my colleague the Minister of Energy and \nPublic Utilities and we will see the quickest way we can do it. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nYes, Dr. Ms Thannoo, please! \nCONTAGIOUS CAPRINE PLEUROPNEUMONIA – GOATS – REPORTED \nCASES – SUPPORT TO SMALL FARMERS & SAFETY MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/921",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 921,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/921) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo \n(Second Member for Quartier Militaire & \nMoka) asked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nwhether, in regard to reported case/s of Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia amidst goats \nbeing reared by small farmers across Mauritius, he will state the measures being taken to – \n(a)  support farmers who have lost their animals, if any  \n(b)  provide prompt professional veterinary services to attend such cases, and  \n(c)  protect healthy animals from being infected. \n\n42",
      "answer": "The Minister of Health and Wellness (Mr A. Bachoo): Madam Speaker, I am \ninformed by the Division of the Veterinary Services of the Ministry that Contagious Caprine \nPleuropneumonia is a severe and even fatal respiratory disease in goats caused by a bacterium \nnamely, mycoplasma capricolum. It is characterised by symptoms as fever, poor appetite, \nbreathing difficulties, coughing and nasal discharge. The disease leads to acute \npleuropneumonia which can cause very high mortality rates in affected herds. Since mid-\nAugust 2025, several cases have been observed in ten goat farms over the island and during \nmeat inspection carried out at the Mauritius Meat Authority. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that a death \ncertificate is being issued by the DVS for the diseased animals. In addition, all farmers who \nare registered with the Small Farmers Welfare Fund under the Breeders Protection Scheme \nwill be paid an amount of Rs6,000 per animal. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that DVS provides 24/7 \nfree service to the breeding community, one veterinary officer is on call after working hours. \nAny sick cases reported to the DVS or its sub-offices, are attended and treated within the \nsame day. For cases with respiratory problems, antibiotics are being given as well as \nsupportive treatment to reduce mortalities and morbidities. 75 % of infected goats which have \nbeen treated on time have recovered. Regular follow up is being done at these farms everyday \nover a period of 5 days.  \nRegarding part (c) of the question, affected farmers are sensitised to avoid trading their \nsick animals and enhance the security measures at their farm level. In the meantime, upon \nreceipt of result from Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour \nle développement, the DVS has requested quotation for foreign suppliers on 22 October 2025 \nfor the supply of 10,000 USD of CCPP vaccines.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister.   \nYes, Mr Lobine.  \nMr Lobine: Madam Speaker, may I ask the hon. Minister as to the number of goats \nthat have died recently with regards to this disease, if you have the figures? \nMr Bachoo: I think it is about 15 goats.  \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle, hon. \nSeeburn.  \n\n43 \n \nGRAND PORT ROAD, NOUVELLE-FRANCE – SPEED CONTROL \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/922",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 922,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/922) Mr  M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Grand Port Road in Nouvelle-\nFrance, he will state whether consideration will be given for the installation of speed humps \nor other speed control measures to ensure the safety of pedestrians, cyclists and other road \nusers thereat, indicating the time frame or plan, if any, for the implementation thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Traffic Management \nand Road Safety Unit (TRMSU) of my Ministry that the village of Nouvelle France is \ncrossed by Savanne Road A9 and Phoenix-Plaisance Road A10 and that no request has been \nreceived for the installation of speed humps or any other speed control measures along \nPhoenix-Plaisance Road A10, commonly known as Grand Port Road. \nI, however, understand that requests have been received for speed controlling measures \nat Pont Colville and Dream Price Supermarket, both located in the village of Nouvelle \nFrance. The TRMSU has advised that due to the topography and the alignment of the road, \nthe construction of raised tables is not being envisaged at those locations as they may pose a \nproblem in terms of visibility.  \nMadam Speaker, the segment of both Savanne Road A9 and Phoenix-Plaisance Road \nA10 crossing the village of Nouvelle France currently have a speed limit of 60 km/h. The \nTRMSU is exploring the possibility of implementing speed zones of 40 km/h at the specific \nlocations along routes A9 and A10 in order to control speed and enhance the safety of \npedestrians, cyclists and other road users. The project would be implemented under the \nframework agreement by a contractor and the name of the contractor will emerge as soon as \nevaluation process is completed at the Central Procurement Board.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Ms Anquetil.  \nSAINT-JEAN ROAD, QUATRE BORNES – INCIDENTS & MEDICAL \nURGENCIES – EMERGENCY EVACUATION PLAN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/923",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 923,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/923) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to Saint-Jean Road in Quatre Bornes, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether an emergency \nevacuation plan has been put in place in case of the occurrence of incidents, including fire \noutbreaks, accidents or medical urgencies and, if so, give details thereof. \n\n44",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Metro Express Ltd that \nan Emergency Response Plan is in place along Saint-Jean Road in Quatre Bornes. This plan \nwas prepared by MEL in collaboration with emergency services including the Mauritius Fire \nand Rescue Services, SAMU and the police in 2022. To improve and facilitate the entry and \nexit of fire trucks, an access point of approximately 12 metres located along Osman Avenue \nwas designed with sufficient turning radius to allow for the safe manoeuvre of the large fire \ntrucks.  This access has been in service since the launch of Phase 2B – Quatre Bornes to \nPhoenix in May 2022 and is to the satisfaction of the Mauritius Fire and Rescue Services.  \nAs such, Madam Speaker, all vehicles including those of emergency services are able to \ntravel from the region of Quatre Bornes towards Saint-Jean, Belle-Rose, La Louise, Sodnac \nor Trianon without the need to take detours.  \nI am further informed that in the event Saint Jean Road is inaccessible, owing to \nsituations like a road accident, the emergency services can also, as a last resort, gain access to \nthe railway tracks after receiving special authorisation from the Metro Express Operation \nControl Centre.  \nThe scenario has been tested during full scale simulation in collaboration with the fire \nservices, SAMU and the police in the presence of the National Disaster Risk Reduction and \nManagement Centre and the Singaporean safety auditor from the SMRT.  \nMadam Speaker, I am pleased to inform the House that the collaborative efforts in \ndeveloping the Emergency Response Plan does not stop here. To ensure that a high level of \ncoordination demonstrated in the initial full scale is maintained and to continuously improve \nour response capability, I am proposing to hold a follow up simulation exercise. This exercise \nwill involve all stakeholders directly – the police, the Fire Services, SAMU, the National \nDisaster and Risk Reduction Management Centre, the Metro Express Ltd and the TRMSU \nwhich was not involved initially.  \nThe primary goal will be to identify any residual issues with the plan, particularly \nconcerning rapid development and coordination across different access points and routes. By \nfinetuning our procedures through this critical practical exercise, we will ensure that in any \ngenuine emergency situation, every action is executed efficiently and effectively, allowing us \nto response swiftly and save lives while ensuring that traffic disturbance is kept to an absolute \nminimum.  \n\n45 \n \nThis proactive approach underscores the government unwavering commitment to safety \nand security of our commuters and the community along the Metro Express corridor.  \nAnd, as a last note, I am tabling the emergency response plan for Saint Jean, Quatre \nBornes.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes.  \nMs Anquetil : Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Would the hon. Minister \ninform the House whether there are designated safe zones or assembly points along Saint \nJean Road for l’évacuation urgente? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes, it is quite detailed in the plan that I have just submitted \nbut when we will meet soon, I hope the hon. Member will facilitate arrangement at some \nappropriate location for us to come and explain what is in the plan so that everybody can \nunderstand.  \nMs Anquetil: A last one, Madam Speaker. Thank you.  \nWill the hon.Minister inform the House how communication will be managed with \nresidents, commuters and emergency services in the event of an accident? Thank you.  \nMr Osman Mahomed A good question, a very pertinent question but like I said, when \nwe will meet in a participative democratic manner in your Constituency, hon. Member, we \nwill detail all these going forward.  \nMadam Speaker: Hon. François, please, last question, I think.  \nPSAC – FOUNDATION PROGRAMME INTRODUCTION – SUCCESS RATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/924",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 924,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/924) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister \nof Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the Primary School Achievement \nCertificate (PSAC) and the Introduction of the Foundation Programme in Literacy, Numeracy \nand Skills in secondary schools, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \n– \n (a) the measures envisaged for unsuccessful students of the 2025 PSAC \nexaminations, and \n(b) \nwhether a Foundation Class at Grade 7 will be put in place in 2026 and, if not, \nindicate the proposed alternative course of action being envisaged. \n\n46",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, allow me before starting to answer this main \nquestion to wish good luck to all the 14,837 PSAC students who have started their PSAC \nexaminations today and which will continue till Friday 31 October.  \nComing to the main question, I wish to inform the House that the Foundation \nProgramme for Literacy, Numeracy and Skills was introduced in January 2025 by this \ngovernment to replace the defunct and much decried Extended Programme. To recall, the \nsuccess rate of the previous Extended Programme was on average a meagre 6% with the \nresult that some 2000 students were leaving the system without a certificate every year.  \nAllow me to provide the hon. Member from Rodrigues, figures related to the \nperformance of our students in Rodrigues.  \nIn 2022, only 3 out of 167 students, in 2023 only 21 out of 204 and in 2024 only 7 out \nof 209 students who took the NCE exams were successful. Only 31 out of 580 students who \ntook the NCE exams in Rodrigues for the past three years were successful.  \nThe figures above clearly show how neither the curriculum nor the assessment \nframeworks of the former Extended Programme was adapted for those children who were \nunsuccessful in their PSAC examinations.  \nIn contrast to the defunct Extended Programme, the FPLNS blends academic and \nvocational components creating clearer pathways towards the technical and vocational \neducation and training stream. The structure of the programme places emphasis on basic \nliteracy, numeracy, digital literacy and practical skills with a view to reducing the dropout \nrate.  \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that all candidates attempting the PSAC \nassessment for the first time and who have not been successful in up to three compulsory core \nsubjects, shall take part in a reassessment session during the month of December to provide \nthem with a second chance to meet the minimum requirement for obtaining their PSAC. \n Candidates who are successful in the reassessment exercise would be admitted to \nGrade 7 of the mainstream programme whereas those who are unsuccessful have two options \n– either to repeat Grade 6, once more, or to join the Foundation Programme at Grade 7.   \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, the options I have just \nmentioned remain valid for the students the 2025 PSAC examinations.  \n\n47 \n \nAs regard to part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that the foundation \nclass at Grade 7 has already been put in place since the beginning of this year and is \noperational in all our schools, including Rodrigues.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nMr François: Just one supplementary.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, you’ve got three minutes.  \nMr François: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I thank the hon. Minister for his answer \nand I also join him to wish good luck to all the students.  \nMay I ask the hon. Minister, whether under the FPLNS, any special subjects will be \nintroduced for Rodriguan students in respect to the specificity of Rodrigues and to provide \ndetail thereof? Thank you.  \nDr. Gungapersad: Thank you, hon. Member, that is an interesting question. Yes, the \nspecificity of Rodrigues has been borne in mind and definitely as electives, students in \nRodrigues will have the options of doing farming and also fishing. These will be part of the \nelectives in Rodrigues.  \nMadam Speaker: Very good. That is a good way to stop, I think. Maybe we can break \nfor one hour and a half.  \nThank you.  \nAt 12.58 p.m., the Sitting was suspended.  \nOn resuming at 2.31 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Savanne and Black River! \nDIGITAL HEALTH LAW DRAFTING – UNDP ENGAGEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/925",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 925,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/925) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the tender launched in 2023 by the \nUnited Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in collaboration with the Ministry for the \nDrafting of the Digital Health Law and Priority Regulations, he will state where matters \nstand, indicating – \n(a) \nthe number of expressions of interest received therefor, and \n(b) \nwhether any fee or payment has been made by Government to the UNDP in \nrelation thereto. \n\n48",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the answer being very lengthy, I would like to \ncirculate it. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. Please circulate. Any supplementary? The hon. \nFourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nECCEA DIRECTOR – QUALIFICATIONS & SELECTION PROCESS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/926",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 926,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/926) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the post \nof the Director of the Early Childhood Care and Education Authority (ECCEA), he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe qualifications and experience required therefor; \n(b) \nthe number of – \n(i) \napplications received, and \n(ii) \ncandidates interviewed to date, if any, and \n(c) \nwhether the Board of the ECCEA has made a formal recommendation for the \nappointment of the current Officer-in-Charge as Acting Director and, if so, \nindicate when.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (a) of the question, \naccording to the existing scheme of service for the post of Director at the Early Childhood \nCare and Education Authority, candidates should inter alia possess the following \nqualifications and experience – \n(a) \nA Cambridge Higher School Certificate or passes in at least 2 subjects obtained \non one certificate at the General Certificate of Education “Advanced Level”; \n(b) \nA degree in Education or Management or Business Administration from a \nrecognised institution; \n(c) \nA Master’s degree in Education or Management or Business Administration \nfrom a recognised institution; or  \n(d) \nEquivalent qualifications to those qualifications I mentioned in part (a) (b) and \n(c) which are acceptable to the board. \n\n49 \n \nIn addition, candidates should, among others, reckon at least five years experience in \nthe education sector inclusive of experience in early childhood care and education. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the scheme of service for the above post further provides under \nthe note section inter alia that – \n“Candidates who, as at 30 June 2008, did not possess a Cambridge Higher School \nCertificate or passes in at least 2 subjects obtained on one certificate at the General \nCertificate of Education “Advanced Level” will also be considered provided they hold \n– \n(a) \nA Cambridge School Certificate or Passes obtained on one certificate the \nGeneral Certificate of Education “Ordinary Level” either – \n(b) \n– \n(i) \nin 5 subjects, including English Language with at least Grade C in any 2 \nsubjects, or \n(ii) \nin 6 subjects, including English Language with at least Grade C in any \none subject, or \n(iii) \nan equivalent qualification acceptable to the board, and \n(c) \nA PHD or a second Masters Degree or a Post Graduate Diploma from a \nrecognised institution or an equivalent qualification acceptable to the board.” \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as for part (b) of the question, I am informed that the post has \nnot been advertised, and as such, the other parts of the question are not applicable. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (c) of the question, I am informed that at its \nspecial board meeting held on 20 August 2025, the ECCEA board has unanimously approved \nthat the present officer in charge of ECCEA be assigned the duties of director pending the \nfilling of the post. As is the current practice, assignment of duties is made on ground of \nadministrative convenience and does not give the incumbent any claim for appointment. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you.  \nMr A. Duval: Yes, may I? \nThe Deputy Speaker: Supplementary?  \n\n50 \n \nMr A. Duval: Yes. The hon. Minister has cited Section 9 of the Act that the person \nmust have recognised qualifications. Can the hon. Minister say whether the person whom the \nboard has proposed, does he have the qualifications, that is, a degree which is recognised by \nthe Higher Education Commission (HEC) and a Master’s Degree as well, recognised by the \nHEC? \nDr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the board will take cognizance of the \nqualifications and so on. I need to check this with the board. \nMr A. Duval: My second question. The hon. Minister might be aware that this exercise \nis being done internally. The hon. Minister is not in a position right now to say whether the \nperson possesses the recognised qualifications. That person stands to gain three times her \nsalary once she is promoted as Acting Director. She earns around Rs60,000. She will earn, \nincluding gratuity, Rs160,000.  \nTherefore, the question is that the hon. Minister should ensure, before appointing that \ncandidate, that her degree and master are indeed recognised.  \nDr. Gungapersad: I will leave it to the Board to do the needful. Definitely, someone \nwill have to manage that institution which is a very important institution and we should not \nbe targeting people uselessly. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \nCITÉ LA CURE – AREA HEALTH CENTRE – DENTAL SERVICES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/927",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 927,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/927) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Cité la Cure \nArea Health Centre, he will state if consideration will be given for the provision of dental \nservices thereat and, if so, when and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, dental services are provided through 71 \ndedicated dental clinics as well as the major hospitals outpatient dental units across the \nisland. \nAs per statistics available, Cité la Cure Community Health Centre serves a catchment \npopulation of some 7400 persons and is located within a sub urban area. Within a radius of 5 \nkm, residents of Cité la Cure have access to several dental facilities namely, at – \n1. \nSainte Croix Community Health Centre – 1.4 km; \n\n51 \n \n2. \nDr. Mahmoodkhan Hyderkhan Mediclinic – 2 km; \n3. \nEastern Suburb CHC – 2.5 km, and \n4. \nBaie du Tombeau CHC – 5 km. \nMy Ministry is in the process of reviewing the expansion of dental services in \nunderserved regions or higher volume centres where the demand for oral health would be \nhigher. Given that the existing Cité la Cure Community Health Centre was designed \nprimarily for general primary care, re-profiting the facility to accommodate a Dental Surgery \nUnit would require substantial infrastructural work and investment. Accordingly, \nestablishment of a full Dental Unit at Cité la Cure Community Health Centre is not envisaged \nat this stage. \nMy Ministry remains firmly committed to ensuring equitable access to oral health care \nfor all citizens. Residents of Cité la Cure will continue to benefit from dental services \navailable at nearby facilities and clear referral pathways to the closest dental clinics and \nHospital Dental Units have been established to facilitate timely and convenient access to care. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, you have a supplementary! \nMr Caserne: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Considering the transport and other \nfacilities that this region currently faces, may I request the Minister to consider this request of \ndental services for Cité la Cure which currently is an issue for all these inhabitants? Thank \nyou. \nMr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, unfortunately, the building itself is not fit to \naccommodate a Dental Department into it. We will look at a later stage if we can try to \nincrease the space. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \n \nPORT-LOUIS NORTH SSS – ENROLMENT TREND – CORRECTIVE MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/928",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 928,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/928) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Education and Human source whether, in regard to the Port-\nLouis North State Secondary School, he ill state the – \n(a) \nnumber of students enrolled thereat, indicating the enrolment trend over the past \nfive years and whether same raises concern and, if so, the corrective measures, if \nany, envisaged in relation thereto, and \n\n52 \n \n(b) \npupil/teacher ratio thereat.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I \nam informed that 160 students are enrolled at the Port-Louis North State Secondary School \nfor academic year 2025. Out of the 160 students, 81 are enrolled in the mainstream \nprogramme, 59 are in the foundation programme in literacy, numeracy and skills and the \nremaining 20 are in Grade 9 Plus which is the last cohort of the of the failed extended \nprogramme. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard to the enrolment trend, the Port-Louis North SSS has \nbeen subject to a decreasing one over the past five years with the number of enrolled students \nas follows –  \n1. \n408 students in year 2019; \n2. \n347 students in year 2021 – the COVID-19 period; \n3. \n331 students in year 2021/2022; \n4. \n289 students in year 2023; \n5. \n241 students in year 2024. \nI wish to inform the House that this decreasing enrolment trend has been observed not \nonly in the Port-Louis North SSS but as well as in other State and private grant aided \nsecondary schools across the island. \nThis phenomenon is due to factors such as decreasing student population and also \nchoice of parents for admission in schools as per the Education Regulations. \nThe said regulations provide that admission to Grade 7 in a regional school is based on \n– \n1. \nThe choice of responsible party; \n2. \nThe residence of the pupil in the geographical zone in which the regional school \nis located, and \n3. \nThe grade aggregate of the pupil in the PSAC assessment. \nThe decreasing student population raises concerns with respect to the sub optimal \nutilisation of government buildings and facilities and an uneven distribution of resources both \nfinancial and human. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry is currently conducting an exercise on all the \nState Secondary Schools including the Port-Louis North SSS in relation to enrolment for \n\n53 \n \nacademic year 2026, taking into consideration projected admissions in Grades 7 and 10 for \nthe Mainstream Programme as well as the Foundation Programme. This exercise will \ndetermine the perennity of numerous schools including Port-Louis North SSS. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, you have a supplementary? \nMs Savabaddy : Merci, M. le président. L’honorable ministre a-t-il un plan peut-être \nde conversion de ce collège d’État en centre de formation professionnelle tout en gardant \ncertains aspects académiques afin d’attirer plus de jeunes et leur offrir une meilleure \nperspective pour l’avenir ? Merci. \nDr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, yes, the EDB and my Ministry are working \non a list of Government Schools that are currently closed and have remained unused over the \nyears and also where we need to close them in order to see how to make optimum use of \ngovernment infrastructure. Your suggestion will be taken on board. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, B/929 has been withdrawn. So, we go to B/930. The Third \nMember for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac. \nPROJET DE RELANCE DU FOOTBALL – ANNUAL BUDGET – EXPECTED \nOUTCOMES – MFA INVOLVEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/929",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 929,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/929) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the “Projet de Relance du football” in \nMauritius, he will state the – \n(a) \nannual budget that is being proposed therefor over the next five years, giving \ndetails thereof; \n(b) \nexpected outcomes for men and women clubs and national teams, respectively \nand at grass root level, and \n(c) \nprojected financial and technical involvement of the Mauritius Football \nAssociation in the implementation thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nThe Deputy Speaker: So, we go to B/930. The Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles \n& Souillac. \nCHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NEEDS – SCHOOL ENROLLMENT – \nSTUDY/SURVEY ON CHALLENGES \n\n54",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/930",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 930,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/930) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to \nchildren with special needs, including those suffering from epilepsy and autism, he will state \nthe number thereof enrolled in schools, indicating – \n(a) \nwhether a study/survey has been carried out to better understand the challenges \nfaced by the latter and, incidentally, by their families in relation to their \nschooling/provision thereto of their educational needs, and \n(b) \nthe specialized help provided thereto in schools.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that there are about 3000 \nchildren with special education needs, including around 649 suffering from autism and 140 \nfrom epilepsy, enrolled in SEN schools. \nFurthermore, 57 learners with autism and 53 with epilepsy are enrolled in mainstream \nprimary and secondary schools. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that no formal study of survey \nhas been carried out of far. However, following continuous interaction with stakeholders \nincluding the families of the SEN children and, subsequently, during the session dedicated to \nSEN sector during Les Assises de l’Éducation, the challenges in relation to the schools and \neducational needs have been identified as follows –  \n(a) \nInadequate provision for physical accessibility in buildings; \n(b) \nUnavailability of specialised vehicles for the transport of children with \ndisabilities; \n(c) \nLack of SEN professionals on the market such as speech therapists, occupational \ntherapists, physiotherapists and even SEN educators; \n(d) \nInadequate specialised training to the existing educators, and \n(e) \nAbsence of an effective early diagnosis mechanism for disabilities. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard part (b) of the question, despite the existing financial \nconstraints, my Ministry is doing its utmost to ensure that these children are not left behind. \nWe are, therefore, providing the following services to SEN schools – \n1. \nPayment of grant-in-aid to NGOs and SeDEC schools registered with the Special \nEducation Needs Authority to cover salaries of staffs, hot meals and a special \nsupport services, occupational speech and physiotherapy. \n\n55 \n \n2. \nTransport facilities for pick-up and drop-up of the children and free bus pass are \nprovided by my Ministry for those attending public schools; \n3. \nAdapted furniture provided to SEN learners; \n4. \nAdapted textbooks including large prints and drawing; \n5. \nServices of teacher assistants to help in academic challenges and of carers for \ndaily living challenges such as eating and toileting, and \n6. \nImplementation of Barrier-free Project is ongoing in primary and secondary \nschools to make way for adapted toilets, infrastructure and accommodations to \nwelcome and provide a conducive environment for SEN learners. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in addition, I am informed by the Ministry of Social \nIntegration, Social Security and National Solidarity that the following facilities are provided \nnamely, – \n1. \nRefund of travelling expenses to children with disabilities attending daycare, \nspecialised, integrated and mainstream schools; \n2. \nRefund of taxi fares to students with severe disabilities. As a new budgetary \nmeasure, the refund of taxi fares has an extended to children with autism \nspectrum disorder and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and 100% duty-free \nfacilities to parents of children with disabilities for the purchase of adapted cars. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, however, as a caring government we want to do more for our \nchildren with disabilities to make them feel at par with others. This is why my Ministry is \ncollaborating with other stakeholders with a view to coming up with a continuum of care for \nall children with disabilities. The objective is to adopt a holistic approach to build a more \ninclusive society and positively support the children and their families. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon.  Dr. Daureeawo. \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Dr. the hon. Minister mentioned continuum of care. So, I am \nthinking maybe if you could clarify whether the hon. Minister is thinking of carrying out \nregular assessments with a view to monitor progress and adapt approaches to address the \nunique needs of each and every child? Is that correct? \nDr. Gungapersad: Obviously, education is a dynamic sector and definitely, officials \nfrom the Ministry and other ministries collaborate in order to look after the welfare of our \nkids, especially those kids with especial education needs. \n\n56 \n \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Dr. Ms Thannoo! \nDr. Ms Thannoo: Can the hon. Minister ensure that these facilities are accessible to the \nearly childhood sector as well? Thank you. \nDr. Gungapersad: Now, I do not know if when you are talking about early childhood, \nyou are talking from 3-5 and we also have an issue, those who are above 20 – according to \nthe Special Education Needs Authority (SENA), there are clear guidelines and definitely, that \npart is taken care of by the Ministry of Gender. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Jhummun! \nMr Jhummun: Is there any plan to cater for these students once they reach the age of \n20? \nDr. Gungapersad: That is an interesting question. As we said, as a caring Government, \nthis has not been taken care of so far. Definitely, like last week, officials from my Ministry \nmet officials from other ministries in order to look deeper into that issue to provide the proper \ncadre for these children to be taken care of, below five and after 20 so that we provide this \ncontinuum of care as I mentioned earlier. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Prayag! \nDr. Prayag: Regarding the transport facilities for disabled children to these schools, is \nthe Ministry planning to implement more vehicles or to change rules in the near future? \nDr. Gungapersad: I think one important thing that this budget brought is about the \nrefund of taxi fares which was not there and it is up to parents and institutions to avail \nthemselves of these facilities which are provided along with the 100% duty-free facilities for \nparents who can afford it for their kids. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, PQs B/931 and B/932 have been withdrawn.  \nSo, we go to the Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière. \nSUGAR INDUSTRY LABOUR WELFARE FUND – OFFICE AUXILIARY/SENIOR \nOFFICE AUXILIARY– PERMANENT EMPLOYMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/931",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 931,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/931) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to Office \nAuxiliary/Senior Office Auxiliary employed by the Sugar Industry Labour Welfare Fund in \n\n57 \n \nSocial Welfare Centres, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to where \nmatters stand as to their employment on a permanent and pensionable establishment.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFOOTBALL PROFESSIONALISATION – IMPLEMENTATION – EXPECTED TIME \nFRAME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/932",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 932,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/932) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the professionalisation \nof football in Mauritius, he will state where matters stand, indicating the expected time frame \nfor the implementation thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSTATUS OF THE ARTIST ACT – EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION – ROADMAP",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/933",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 933,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/933) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the local artists, he will state whether \nhis Ministry has developed a clear roadmap to ensure the effective implementation of the \nStatus of the Artist Act in Mauritius and, if so, give details thereof and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Gondeea: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to local artists and the Status of the \nArtist Act, my Ministry has initiated a review of the legislation in line with the measures \nannounced in the Government Programme 2025-2029. The aim is to ensure that the Act better \nreflects the realities, expectations and aspirations of the artistic community while aligning \nwith international standards defining cultural workers. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it must be noted that this Act was conceived and introduced \nunder the previous Government without adequate consultation with artists. As a result, many \nin the artistic community expressed dissatisfaction, feeling that the law did not sufficiently \nprotect their rights nor reflect their realities. In fact, during the drafting process, l’Union des \nArtistes had voiced strong reservations regarding the content and objective of the proposed \nlegislation. According to the Union, the Act in its form, failed to provide adequate protection \nand recognition to Mauritian artists. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is worth recalling that during the debates on this very Bill in \n2023, the hon. Member himself, still on the Opposition side, had raised several concerns \nregarding the lack of an appropriate definition of the term ‘artist’, the insufficient social \nprotection mechanism for cultural workers and the limited consultation with the artistic \n\n58 \n \ncommunity. The hon. Member had also emphasised the need to align the law with \nUNESCO’s definition of an artist and to ensure that Mauritian artists are recognised as full-\nfledged workers with equitable rights and conditions. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the new Government shares these same concerns. We are, in \nfact, addressing precisely these shortcomings identified at that time through a comprehensive \nand inclusive review process aimed at strengthening the legal, social and professional \nframework for our artists. We firmly believe that the voice of our artists must be at the very \ncentre of any cultural policy. We have therefore deemed it necessary to pause the \nimplementation of the Act and undertake a comprehensive review to ensure that it truly \nserves the interests of Mauritian artists and align with international best practices. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in this respect, my Ministry has launched a national \nconsultative process through the Convention Nationale sur les Arts et la Culture, bringing \ntogether artists, cultural operators and other stakeholders to collectively assess the sector and \npropose a strategic roadmap for its development. I am personally attending all sessions to \nhear directly from artists, including their views on the Status of the Artist Act. Once \nconsultations in both Mauritius and Rodrigues are completed, my Ministry will consolidate \nthe views expressed and proceed with the review so that the new framework truly reflects the \naspirations of our artists. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, unlike in the past where artists were not sufficiently consulted, \nour government is adopting a participatory and democratic approach. The voice of our artists \nwill remain at the centre of our cultural policy and the review of the Status of the Artist Act \nwill be treated as a matter of priority to ensure its implementation at the earliest for the \nbenefit of all our artists. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes? \nMr Quirin: M. le président, l’honorable ministre peut-il indiquer à la Chambre si un \nregistre national des artistes a été créé et quel est le nombre d’artistes qui y sont inscrits à ce \njour ? \nMr Gondeea: We are actually working on this, hon. Member. \n\n59 \n \nMr Quirin: Une dernière question. Peut-on savoir si son ministère a prévu des mesures \npour soutenir les jeunes artistes émergeant dans les régions urbaines comme dans les rurales, \ncela afin d’assurer une application équitable de la loi sur tout le territoire mauricien ? \nMr Gondeea: As I stated in my reply, we are working on this together with artists to \nknow their grievances and then, a road map will be worked on. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \nPRIVATE HEALTHCARE SECTOR – FEES & CHARGES – FIXING OF QUANTUM \n– MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/934",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 934,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/934) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the \nfees and charges for services provided by the private healthcare sector, he will state whether \nmeasures are being put in place for the regulation thereof, including the fixing of the quantum \nthereof and prevention of any kind of collusion in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Health and Wellness (Mr A. Bachoo): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with \nyour permission, I shall answer this question. \nI wish to refer the hon. Member to the reply I made to Parliamentary Question B/848 at \nour Sitting of 07 October 2025, providing that I highlighted, inter alia, that the Private Health \nInstitutions Act 1989 does not empower my Ministry to regulate the cost of treatment and \nservices and even less, the fixing of the quantum thereof. I reiterate anew that the question of \nregulating the cost of treatment and services offered by private healthcare institutions is \nindeed a complex matter which must be approached with due care and caution. It would \nrequire wide consultations with all relevant stakeholders, including patients’ associations, \nprivate operators, insurance companies and professional bodies. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, health services, unlike other commodities, vary widely in \nscope and nature, ranging from simple outpatient consultations to highly specialised surgical \nprocedures, each requiring different levels of medical expertise, technological inputs and \ninfrastructural investments. Given this diversity, it would not be appropriate nor feasible to \nimpose standardised or uniform pricing across the sector as such an approach could risk \nservice quality, discouraging investment, limiting patient choice and affecting the overall \nsustainability of private healthcare systems. \n\n60 \n \nThat said, Government remains mindful of the need to safeguard the public interest, \nparticularly in the area of pharmaceuticals where the prices of essential medicines are already \nbeing regulated to ensure that patients have continued access to affordable and lifesaving \ntreatments. I am informed that the Ministry of Commerce and Consumer Protection already \nregulates the prices of several essential pharmaceutical products through a regressive markup \nmechanism to ensure that medicines remain affordable. As present, this mechanism applies to \neight critical classes of medicines, namely – \n\nanticancer; \n\nantidiabetic; \n\nantihypertensive; \n\ncardiovascular medicines; \n\ninhalers; \n\nbiological vaccines, and \n\nantacids. \nOn the issue of possible collusion in the fixing of fees and charges, I wish to underline \nthat it is the Competition Commission of Mauritius which is mandated by law to investigate \nand sanction anticompetitive practices in all sectors, including health. The Commission is \nwarranted to impose financial penalties and take corrective measures to ensure a fair and \ncompetitive market pricing. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have been informed by the Ministry of Commerce and \nConsumer Protection that the Competition Commission has been approached to conduct an \ninvestigation in the health-related sector in line with legal framework. At the level of my \nMinistry, our main focus is to upgrade and strengthen services in the public health sector so \nthat citizens may continue to access high quality healthcare free of charge and recourse to \nprivate treatment is not done out of necessity, but as a matter of choice.  \nOn that scope, I am pleased to announce that several foreign private hospitals have \nexpressed their intention to establish their operations in Mauritius. The presence of multiple \nhospitals competing in the sector is expected to foster healthy competition which would \neventually contribute to more competitive pricing for health services and treatment. \n\n61 \n \nFor the information of the House, I wish to emphasise that this Government has made it \na priority to invest significantly in critical areas such as cancer care, renal and cardiac \nservices as well as in the continual development of our medical personnel. I do not have any \nqualm in saying that our services in many areas are comparable to those of some of the best \nprivate health facilities locally and abroad. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, while the direct regulation of prices in the private sector is for \nall intent and purposes not feasible, the matter remains open for discussion in the context of \nwider consultations in the context of the forthcoming review of the Private Health Institutions \nAct. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. François! \nMr François: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I refer to the cost of a radiological investigation \nin a private hospital – \n\nCT Angio cardiac: Rs29,000;  \n\nCT all abdomen contrast: Rs13,700, totalling Rs42,800.  \nWill the hon. Minister state whether at the level of his Ministry, there are some \ncomparative costs of pricing of services in comparison to the public sector and the private \nhealthcare sectors? \nMr Bachoo: We do not have any such system, but all these facilities are available in \nour own institutions. I would invite the hon. Member to encourage patients to come to our \nhospitals. They are welcomed. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix! \nPOLICE & CRIMINAL JUSTICE BILL – PROPOSED INTRODUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/935",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 935,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/935) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nAttorney General whether, in regard to the proposed introduction of the Police and Criminal \nJustice Bill in the Assembly, he will state where matters stand, indicating whether the \npractice of lodging provisional charges against every suspect of arrestable offences after \nevery arrested offence will be done away with. \n\n62",
      "answer": "Mr Glover: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as the House is aware, there have been several \nparliamentary questions over time in relation to the Police and Criminal Justice Bill, formerly \nknown as the Police and Criminal Evidence Bill. The Police and Criminal Evidence Bill (No. \nIV of 2013) was introduced in the National Assembly on 16 April 2013 for First Reading. \nThe National Assembly was subsequently prorogued and the Bill never went through.  \nI wish to inform the House that since 2013, this Bill has had a rather checkered history, \nso much so that it has never really been finalised and certainly not gone through the \nlegislative process.  \nThereafter, as from 2015, the preceding government looked for expert advice and \nreports were produced, including one by Professor Michael Zander KC, who opined that the \nBill ought to be introduced with relevant Codes of Practice. It is important to note that these \nCodes of Practice were – \n\nFirst of all, the exercise by Police Officers of statutory powers to stop and search. \n\nThe second code would look at the searches of premises by Police Officers and \nthe seizure of property found by Police Officers on persons or premises. \n\nThe third Code of Practice looked at the statutory powers of arrest by Police \nOfficers. \n\nThe fourth Code of Practice related to the detention treatment and questioning of \npersons by Police Officers. \n\nThe fifth one related to the identification process of persons by Police Officers. \nIn 2016, Sir Geoffrey Rivilin QC, a consultant, was mandated by the Commonwealth \nSecretariat to review the Police and Criminal Evidence Bill, and in his initial report to \nMauritius advised that, and I quote – \n“My recommendation in that report was that subject to the views of the important \nstakeholders I was about to meet, provisional information and provisional charges \nshould be abolished.” \n\n63 \n \nThe alternative to the ongoing provisional charge or provisional information had been \nworked out. In 2019, this Bill was almost finalised, but there was a clear lack of political will \nto bring about this fundamental change. Provisional information and provisional charges had \nbeen widely used, dare I say, abused by the Police as from 2015. And many political figures \nhad to suffer the torments and anguish resulting from the arbitrary use of that procedure. Ceci \nexplique bien cela. \nI wish to inform the House that this Government is determined to introduce the Police \nand Criminal Justice Bill before the National Assembly after consultations are completed. \nSince the beginning of this year, my office has been looking into improvements that can be \nbrought to existing versions of the Bill, the latest one dated 2019. My office has already \nbegun formal consultations with the Office of the DPP and the Office of the Commissioner of \nPolice in relation to the finalisation of the Police and Criminal Justice Bill. Indeed, a copy of \nan initial 2025 Police and Criminal Justice Bill has been sent to the Office of the DPP and \nthat of the Commissioner of Police for their views and input. \nBut let me say this for the benefit of the House and of the general public, it is also my \nintention to widen the scope of these consultations to include stakeholders such as – but, of \ncourse, not limited to – Transparency International, the NGO Dis-Moi and other relevant \nNGOs and organisations. What must be emphasised is that we shall be doing away with \nprovisional charges as we know them today. But there is a need to formulate a new process to \nbe adopted by investigative authorities which will now have to work in closer collaboration \nwith the prosecuting authority.  \nIt is in this vein that we are also working on the National Prosecution Service Bill and \nthe Mauritius National Crime Agency Bill. This is indeed a very tall order given the limited \nresources available at my office, which it bears reminding, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, is the \nsmallest budget of all Ministries. \nThe Police and Criminal Justice Bill will indeed revolutionise the criminal justice \nsystem and will require the bind of the Office of the DPP and that of the Commissioner of \nPolice to be workable so that it will not hinder investigating authorities whilst ensuring that \nfundamental rights are preserved and protected. \n\n64 \n \nLet me end with a word of caution. Putting a bill through Parliament, especially this \none, may be probably the easiest part. What will also be needed, and that is probably more \nimportant, is –  \n(i) \na change in the mindset of investigative authorities.  \n(ii) \nthe necessity for training for all stakeholders in the criminal justice system, and  \n(iii) \ncapacity building of important departments such as forensics and cybersecurity. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River! \nMINISTRIES/DEPARTMENTS – RENTED BUILDINGS & PREMISES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/936",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 936,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/936) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the buildings and premises rented by \nMinistries and Government Departments, he will, for the benefit of the House, provide a list \nthereof, indicating in each case the – \n(a) \nname of the owner;  \n(b) \nextent and location thereof;  \n(c) \nmonthly rental and total annual rental payable;  \n(d) \nduration of the lease, and  \n(e) \nthe number thereof currently left abandoned and under renovation.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, regarding part (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) of the \nquestion, I wish to inform the House that these elements of information are available at the \nlevel of Ministries and Departments. The General Office Management Unit of my Ministry \nonly gives necessary clearances to enable Ministries and Departments to proceed with the \nsignature of lease agreements with private building owners subject to availability of funds, \nconcurrence to rental rates as recommended by the Valuation Department, structural \nsoundness of the private building as determined by my Ministry, among others.  \nIn the same vein, my Ministry also rents office space from various private owners. The \ntotal annual rental payable amounts to around Rs42.7 million. If I take into account the rent \n\n65 \n \npaid by parastatal bodies under the aegis of my Ministry such as RDA, CIA, LDA and DICL, \nthe total amount payable will be around Rs70 million. In view thereof, we are exploring the \npossibility of setting up a MNI House which would regroup all departments and divisions of \nmy Ministry into one strategic location. The project is expected to be implemented under a \nsuitable private public partnership model. \nThis bold initiative aims at improving the efficiency and effectiveness in service \ndelivery and would bring positive spillover other benefits to the country at large. For \nconvenience purposes, information pertaining to part (a), name of the owners, part (b) extent \nand location thereof, part (c) monthly rental and total annual rental payable and part (d) \nduration of the lease have been compiled. I am tabling a copy, thereof, to the House. \nWith respect to the last part of the question, I wish to reassure the House that all \nbuildings currently being rented by my Ministry are in very good state and do not require any \nmajor renovation or maintenance. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes! \nLA LOUISE, QUATRE BORNES – FLOOD MITIGATION MEASURES – \nDRAIN CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/937",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 937,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/937) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the flood mitigation \nmeasures in the region of La Louise, Quatre Bornes, he will state if consideration will be \ngiven for the construction of drains along the Lal Bahadur Shastri Avenue and Boundary \nRoad behind the Queen Victoria Hospital, instead of solely along the Candos-Vacoas Road.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with a view to addressing the flooding issues \nholistically and mitigating the incidence of flooding in the region of La Louise, I am \ninformed that the NDU has appointed Vyyaass Consulting Engineer Ltd as consultant for the \ndesign and supervision for flood mitigation measures in the region of La Louise, La Source \nand Candos, Quatre Bornes. Owing to the complexity of the project and the site conditions, \nthe project will be implemented in different phases. The Land Drainage Authority has \nrecommended as Phase 1 – Construction of Absorption Drains along Lal Bahadur Shastri \nAvenue and Candos-Vacoas Road as short-term measures. Phase 2 will involve works along \nBoundary Road, Sik Yuen Road, Nehru Road and Phoenix-Beaux Songes Road amongst \nothers.  \n\n66 \n \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I further informed that the project proposal for the short-term \nmeasures has been submitted by the consultant on 22 July 2025. Consequently, the project \nproposals and drawings were circulated to different stakeholders, including the Municipality \nof Quatre Bornes, the RDA, the Victoria Hospital and the Wastewater Management Authority \non 31 July 2025. A presentation on the project proposal was also held on 06 August 2025 with \nall the stakeholders.  \nAs at date, only the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes has submitted its views, \nrequesting the NDU to amend the design by constructing the absorption drain along \nBoundary Road with two retention ponds instead of constructing an absorption drain along \nCandos-Vacoas Road as initially recommended by the LDA. Consequently, the request for the \nchange in design proposed by the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes has been forwarded to \nthe LDA for consideration on 29 September 2025. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, on the other hand, the Road Development Authority has \ninformed that it is not agreeable to the proposed construction of a stormwater absorption \ndrain and provision of metal gratings along the carriage way of the Candos-Vacoas Road \nbecause of the following reasons – \n1. \nSame will severely affect the pavement structure of the road; \n2. \nIt represents road safety hazards; \n3. \nCause serious traffic issues during implementation. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in view of the conflicting views, I have requested the Chief \nProject Manager of the NDU to chair a technical committee with all stakeholders and to come \nup with urgent implementable measures to mitigate flooding in the region of La Louise, \nQuatre Bornes. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Ms Anquetil! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, M. le président. Je remercie le ministre pour sa \nréponse. In view of the recurrent flooding affecting residents and road users, could the hon. \nMinister inform the House whether urgent measures can be envisaged, please? Thank you. \nMr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am sure my colleague knows the complexity \nof the work over there, even in certain regions, we have to relocate  \n\n67 \n \nHouses. So, we do not go about abruptly or quickly, so that is why I have put up a technical \ncommittee which I have asked to work very fast and to come with recommendation with \nimmediate and short-term measures as to what can be done. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 4 – RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS – ASBESTOS – \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/938",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 938,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/938) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change \nwhether, in regard to the presence of asbestos in residential buildings, he will state the \nnumber of housing units concerned therewith in Constituency No. 4, indicating the measures \nbeing taken in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Mr Bhagwan: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Solid Waste Management \nDivision of my Ministry that in Constituency No. 4, there are 38 housing units at Longue \nMountain and 3 at Congoma which still contain cemented asbestos sheets. It should be noted \nthat it is only upon request from owners of the housing units that the Solid Waste \nManagement Division proceeds with the dismantling and removal of the asbestos sheets from \nthe housing units. A contract has recently been awarded by my Ministry for the dismantling, \nremoval and disposal of asbestos sheets from the housing units. \nAccording to a survey carried out by the Ministry of Housing and Lands recently, there \nare still around 1,560 ex-CHA housing units containing asbestos. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in order to expedite matters with respect to this long-standing \nissue, an inter-ministerial committee is being set up at the level of my Ministry under the \nchair of hon. Joanna Bérenger, Junior Minister, comprising representatives of the Ministry of \nFinance, Ministry of Housing and Lands, Ministry of National Infrastructure, Ministry of \nHealth and Wellness, Ministry of Local Government and my Ministry to make \nrecommendation to government for the complete phasing out of the housing units containing \nasbestos sheets in Mauritius. Our first meeting is scheduled to be held this Friday, 31 October \n2025. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, supplementary! \n\n68 \n \nMs Savabaddy: Je remercie le ministre de prendre ce problème à cœur. Connaissant la \ndétresse et l’anxiété des habitants de Cité EDC à Montagne Longues, est-ce-que l’honorable \nministre peut-il donner l’assurance qu’une solution sera trouvée au plus vite afin d’alléger la \nsouffrance de mes mandants ? Merci. \nMr Bhagwan: M. le président, c’est un problème que nous avons-nous même dans \nl’opposition combattu. Nous avions dénoncé la lenteur du précèdent gouvernement. C’est un \nhéritage lourd mais je suis sûre qu’avec la compréhension et avec l’aide de tout un chacun \nmais surtout l’aide de mon collègue que nous trouvons des solutions à court terme et bien \nrapides. \n The Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: I just want to ask a question. I heard the hon. Minister mentioning an \ninter-ministerial committee that would be set up to look at the effects of asbestos in their \ncommunity. We did have an Addison Report that was set up which came following the \nintervention of now our Deputy Prime Minister at the time and will this inter-ministerial \ncommittee liaise, have any implication as to what was recommended by the Addison Report \nso that these 3,115 houses that were supposed to have asbestos since cyclone Carol, will \nfinally be eradicated? Thank you. \nMr Bhagwan: M. le président, nous allons prendre tous les rapports que nous avons eu, \nle récent rapport que mon collègue a fait commanditer et venir le plus rapidement avec une \nsolution parce que déjà dans le passé il y a eu, je crois 800 millions qui a été voté dans un \nbudget précèdent mais rien n’a été fait au fils des années. Maintenant nous avons la ferme \nintention, les maisons se trouvent dans plusieurs circonscriptions et plusieurs sont dans des \nétats les plus, je ne vais pas dire déplorables, difficiles à vivre pour ces occupants. Il est notre \nferme intention de trouver une solution, surtout avec l’aide de tout un chacun. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES – ISLETS MANAGEMENT – FORESTS AND RESERVES ACT – \nAMENDMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/939",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 939,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/939) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to the islets in \nthe lagoon of Rodrigues, he will state if consideration will be given to amending the Forests \n\n69 \n \nand Reserves Act and any other relevant legislation, with a view to vesting the responsibility \nfor the management thereof in the Rodrigues Regional Assembly.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Health and Wellness (Mr A. Bachoo): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, \npresently two islets found in the lagoon of Rodrigues namely, Île aux Cocos and… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Minister, you are stepping in for the Minister of Agro- \nIndustry… \nMr Bachoo: Yes! \nThe Deputy Speaker: You have to inform the House for that we put it on record. \nMr Bachoo: Okay, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am answering on behalf of my colleague.  \nPresently two islets found in the lagoon namely, Île aux Cocos and Île aux Sables are \ndeclared as nature reserves under the Second Schedule of the Forests and Reserves Act. As \nper existing legal provisions, the management of nature reserves fall under the responsibility \nof Forestry Service of my Ministry. In the case of Rodrigues, I am however informed that Île \naux Cocos and Île aux Sables are being managed by the Forestry Service of Rodrigues \npursuant to sections 26 and 54 of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act. \nIn these circumstances, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, no amendment is warranted under the \nForests and Reserves Act with regard to the vesting of the responsibility for the management \nof the two islets in the Rodrigues Regional Assembly. I should nevertheless inform the House \nthat drafting instructions for a new Forests and Reserves Bill which will repeal and replace \nthe current Act, has already been conveyed to the Attorney General’s Office.  \nOnce a draft version of the Bill is obtained, our colleagues from the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly will be consulted thereon, including any proposal to declare other islets in the \nlagoon of Rodrigues as nature reserves. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River. I \nunderstand that PQ B/941 has been withdrawn.  \nHARRY LATOUR STADIUM – RENOVATION WORKS – STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/940",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 940,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/940) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nwhether, in regard to the microchipping of dogs, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nand table copy of the contract awarded by the Mauritius Society for Animal Welfare for the \nprocurement of microchips therefor and obtain information as to the – \n(a)  number of responsive bidders in relation thereto;  \n(b)  name of the successful bidder, and  \n(c)  specifications of the microchips, scanners and software procured, including the \ntotal contract price and quantity ordered.",
      "answer": "Reply: The procurement exercise for the supply of microchips was carried out at the \nlevel of the Mauritius Society for Animal Welfare (MSAW). The letter of award was issued to \nPurpleblue Medical Ltd on 01 October 2025. The Letter of Award to the successful bidder is \nhereby being placed in the Library of the National Assembly. It is to be noted that bids were \ninvited under Restricted Bidding method from 13 Bidders. The bidding documents were \nlaunched on 22 August 2025 and the closing date for submission of bids was 05 September \n2025. At the time of the opening, only two bids were received within the scheduled \ntimeframe. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that a Bid Evaluation Committee \nwas set up at the MSAW and both bids were found to be technically responsive. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, the letter of award was issued to Purpleblue Medical \nLtd given that the latter was the lowest technically responsive bidder.  \n\n138 \n \nRegarding part (c) of the question, the specifications of the microchip include, amongst \nothers, the size of the transponder, syringe applicator, 15 digits identification number. The \nBidding Document comprising all requirements to be fulfilled by the Suppliers is hereby \nbeing placed in the Library of the National Assembly.  \nAs for the procurement of scanners, same were not included in the procurement \nexercise since MSAW has the required number of scanners. The microchips will only provide \nan identification number which will be used by the MSAW to identify the owner of the dog. \nNo software is required for the scanner to read the microchip. As such, the MSAW has not \nprocured any software for this exercise.  \nFor this procurement exercise, 15,000 microchips have been ordered and the contract \nprice amounts to Rs724,500, inclusive of VAT. \nPUBLIC HOSPITALS – AUTOCLAVES & BOILERS – INSPECTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/941",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 941,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/941) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the renovation works \nundertaken at the Harry Latour Stadium, he will state where matters stand.  \n\n70",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCITÉ LA FERME, BAMBOUS – WASTE WATER NETWORK PROJECT – \nSTATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/942",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 942,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/942) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the waste water network project \nin Cité La Ferme, Bambous, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Waste \nWater Management Authority, information as to where matters stand, indicating – \n (a) whether all the households have been connected thereto and if not, why not; \n(b) \nthe sum of money paid to the contractor for variation works, if any, as at date, and  \n(c) whether the network at Avenue de L’independence, Bambous, will be upgraded and \nconnected thereto in view of overflow issues caused by blockages linked to the \nconstruction of NSLD houses nearby.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: M. le président, concernant la partie (a) de la question, la WMA \nm’informe que la Cité La Ferme à Bambous est un lotissement de type CHA comprenant \nenviron 275 logements. Le quartier était sujet de fréquents débordements d’eaux usées \ncausant de graves problèmes et des désagréments aux résidents.     \nAfin d’apporter une solution durable à ces problèmes, la WMA a lancé un projet \nd’assainissement à la Résidence La Ferme selon une formule conception/construction. Ce \nprojet comprenait 3 volets principaux – la construction d’un égout routier à la Résidence La \nFerme à Bambous, le raccordement des maisons et la construction d’un collecteur le long de \nA3 à Bambous.  \nÀ la suite d’un appel d’offre mené par la Central Procurement Board, le contrat a été \nattribué Serveng Company Ltd, le 04 juillet 2023. Les travaux ont commencé le 29 juillet \n2023 et ont été pratiquement achevés le 15 août 2025. L’entrepreneur procède actuellement à \nla remise en étape finale de la route dans la Cité La Ferme et celle-ci devrait être achevée \nd’ici fin octobre 2025. À ce jour, 3.1 km de conduite d’égouts ont été posées et 3.3 km des \ntuyaux de la Central Water Authority ont été remplacés dans le cadre de ce contrat.  \nConcernant la partie (a) de la question, la WMA m’informe que 220 foyers sur 270 sont \nraccordés au réseau d’assainissement public. Les 50 foyers situés le long d’une partie de l’A3 \nBlack River Road, Mahatma Gandhi Lane, AK Azaad Lane et Kubarawa Lane n’ont pas pu \nêtre raccordés suite aux objections des certains résidents.  \n\n71 \n \nLa WMA mènera une campagne de communication dans les semaines à venir \nconcernant les raccordements restants, dont les 50 restants. Et, en absence d’objection des \nrésidents concernés, les locaux seront raccordés au réseau conformément aux prochains \ncontrats-cadres qui devraient être attribués par la WMA en décembre de cette année-ci ou au \nplus tard premier semaine de janvier de l’année prochaine.     \nEn ce qui concerne la partie (b) de la question, la WMA m’informe qu’aucune somme \nde variation n’a été émise en vertu du contrat.  \nM. le président, quant à la partie (c) de la question, je suis en outre informé par la \nWMA que l’avenue de l’Independence se situe en dehors de la zone du projet. Il est à noter \nque l’avenue de Independence est située dans un lotissement Mon Repos, ex Sugar Industry \nLabour Welfare Fund a Bambous qui se compose d’environs 50 maisons et se trouve \nenvirons 100 mètres du nouveau lotissement NSLD, actuellement en construction.  \nLe system d’évacuation des eaux usées et de la Cité Mon Repos se compose d’un \nréseau d’égouts interne, actuellement raccordé à deux fosses septiques communes. Bien que \nle quartier ne soit pas raccordé au tout à l’égout public, la WMA assure et je m’assure aussi, \nsur demande des services de pompage pour vider la fosse septique commune afin de réduire \nles nuisances pour des raisons humanitaires. Comme il ne s’agit pas d’une solution durable, la \nWMA a contacté la NSLD en vue de fournir une solution permanente qui comprendra la \ndéconnexion du réseau interne du domaine du système communale et sa reconnexion par \ngravité à son nouveau système d’égouts construit.  \nLe 4 septembre 2025, donc le mois dernier, la NSLD a informé la WMA qu’elle \nprendrait en charge la reconnexion du domaine à sa nouvelle station de pompage. La \nreconnexion du lotissement de Mon Repos à la nouvelle station du NSLD devrait être \nachevée d’ici mai 2026, dans à peu près quatre à six mois.  \nMerci.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes. \nQUATRE BORNES URBAN TERMINAL – PARKING SPACE \nCONSTRUCTION – PROJECT STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/943",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 943,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/943) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the proposed construction of \nparking space for vehicles, with the upcoming proposed Quatre Bornes Urban Terminal \n\n72 \n \nProject, on Victoria Avenue opposite Bus Terminal in Quatre Bornes, he will state where \nmatters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by Metro Express Ltd \nthat to address the issue of lack of parking, pick-up and drop-off facilities around the Quatre \nBorne Light Rail Station, four plots of land situated near Courts Mammouth Building were \nacquired by the Ministry of Housing and Lands and handed over to MEL in February 2024.  \nSubsequently, in June 2024, MEL awarded a contract for the sum of Rs14.9 million \ninclusive of VAT – it is a long figure but I am going to mention Rs14.9 million – to \nTransinvest Construction Ltd for the provision of lay-by with shelter and toilets at Quatre \nBorne station. The project consists of the following – \n1. \nConstruction of public toilet blocks; \n2. \nOffice for MEL officers; \n3. \nParking space for vehicles and related amenities; \n4. \nBus lay-by along Victoria Avenue. \nHowever, I am informed that, at a meeting held at the Municipal Council of Quatre \nBornes in July 2024, MEL was requested to examine the possibilities of foregoing those plots \nof land for the provision of additional bus base required under the Quatre Bornes Urban \nTerminal Project.  \nAt the time, the construction of the Park and Ride Project was well on the way and it \nwould have been difficult to alter the scope of the project without entailing contractual and \nfinancial implications.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in August 2024, MEL had received a petition from the \nresidents of the locality expressing their serious concerns to the conversion of the proposed \nparking site into bus base. Concerns raised pertained essentially to traffic congestion, safety, \nnoise and air pollution, as well as privacy issues, in view that the site lies within a residential \nzone. Disruption of local access arising from movement of buses for alighting and boarding \nof passengers throughout the day, was evoked as another major issue.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in January this year, I chaired a meeting on the issue whereby \nit was agreed that the construction works for the parking facilities would be temporarily put \non hold, pending a final decision on the implementation of the Quatre Bornes Urban \nTerminal Project. As at date, the construction of the toilet block has been completed and \n\n73 \n \nMEL is in the process of handing over the site to the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes for \nits operation.  \nThe construction of the bus lay-by has also been completed and is in use. I am informed \nthat the council will launch an expression of interest shortly for its operation. According to \nthe information obtained from MEL, 53% of the works have been completed in regard to the \nparking space.  \nI am further informed by the Ministry of Local Government that in light – I think this is \nimportant – of the complaints received from inhabitants against the proposed bus holding \narea traffic centre, the Council has, at its public infrastructure meeting on 13 October 2025, \nthat is two weeks ago, decided that the said site be maintained for the construction of the park \nand ride facility.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, one supplementary.  \nMs Anquetil : Je vous remercie, M. le président. Could the hon. Minister inform the \nHouse whether consultations have been held with residents and stakeholders who signed the \npetition, please? Thank you. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Seemingly that has been done at the level of the Municipal \nCouncil of Quatre Bornes for them to arrive at that recommendation two weeks ago.  \nMs Anquetil: Second one, please. Last one.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, last one. Quick.  \nMs Anquetil: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Would the hon. Minister inform the \nHouse whether an Environmental Impact Assessment or Traffic Impact Study has been \nconducted to ensure that the proposed parking area will not worsen congestion on Victoria \nAvenue? Thank you.  \nMr Osman Mahomed: You mean for the Park and Ride for the Metro Express Ltd?  \nMs Anquetil: Yes. \nMr Osman Mahomed: I can do that. Yes. Thank you.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix!  \nGAZA CRISIS – HUMANITARIAN LAW VIOLATION – \nGOVERNMENT’S DIPLOMATIC MEASURES \n\n74",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/944",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 944,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade",
      "question": "(No. B/944) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade whether, in regard \nto Gaza, following recent findings and official statements from the United Nations (UN) and \nother international bodies confirming serious violations of international humanitarian law and \nacts constituting genocide committed thereat, he will state if Government will consider – \n(a) \ncondemning Israel’s actions in stronger terms at the UN and elsewhere; \n(b) \nsevering/suspending diplomatic relations with Israel until a verified, immediate \nand permanent ceasefire is observed and respected, and \n(c) \nsupporting/joining international legal actions before the International Court of \nJustice in defence of Palestinian civilian lives and international law.",
      "answer": "Mr Ramful: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we are profoundly disheartened by the atrocities \nwhich have been taking place in Gaza. For the past two years, we have witnessed the \nhumanitarian tragedies taking place there with more than 65,000 casualties, mainly women \nand children.  \nOn our part, we continue to closely follow developments surrounding the ceasefire \nagreement reached under the 20-point peace plan proposed by the US President Donald \nTrump on 29 September 2025. \nIn answer to part (a) of the question, the House may recall that Mauritius has always \nshown its unwavering support for the legitimate struggle of the Palestinian people and has \nforcefully condemned Israel for its violations of humanitarian law. \nWe have consistently voiced out our long-standing principal position in favour of a just \nand sustainable peace in the Middle East shared widely by the international community \nwhich is the Two-State solution. As at now, 158 Member States of the United Nations, \nincluding Mauritius, have recognised the State of Palestine, representing more than 80% of \nthe United Nation’s membership. \nA lasting solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict can only be achieved by peaceful \nmeans based on relevant United Nations resolutions and in accordance with the international \nlaw on the principal of the Two-State solution which indeed represents the only viable option \nto bring an end to this enduring conflict. \nI would like to inform the House that on 18 August 2025, the Palestinian Minister of \nForeign Affairs and Expatriates sent me a letter conveying the profound appreciation of \n\n75 \n \nPalestine on the clear and principal position of Mauritius, which reaffirms the inherent and \ninalienable rights of the Palestinian to life, dignity and statehood. A copy of the letter is being \ntabled for the benefit of the House. \nOn the other hand, I wish to underscore that Mauritius has consistently lent its support \nfor the Palestinian cause by voting in favour of resolutions, decisions at the level of various \nUnited Nations bodies, like the General Assembly, the Human Rights Council and UNESCO.  \nThe most recent illustration of our support was on 25 August 2025 when Mauritius \nendorsed the New York Declaration on the Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine \nand the Implementation of the Two-State solution that was adopted at the high-level \ninternational conference in July 2025. \nThe New York Declaration highlights the international community’s collective \nresponsibility to bring a definite end to the decades long conflict through political and \ndiplomatic means. During the high-level international conference, in line with our well-\nestablished practice, Mauritius strongly reiterated our long-standing support for Palestine. \nThe same position was reiterated by Mauritius during the high-level week of the UN \nGeneral Assembly on 22 September 2025. I also wish to place on record that Mauritius was \nnot present during the address of the Prime Minister of Israel on the UN General Assembly \non 26 September 2025. At its session of 19 September 2025, Cabinet agreed to make a cash \ndonation of 50,000 USD to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine \nRefugees in the Near East to support humanitarian action for the people of Palestine. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, regarding the severance of ties with Israel, I \nwish to point out the following – \nDiplomatic relations were established with Israel in March 1968. Those relations \nwere severed on 07 July 1976. Mauritius recognised the Palestine Liberation \nOrganisation in May 1979 and relations with Israel were re-established on 29 \nSeptember 1993, following the signature of the Israel PLO Peace Agreement on 13 \nSeptember 1993. \nSince the election of this new Government, in November 2024, my Ministry has \nensured that bilateral exchanges with Israel be reduced purposefully to a minimum. \nFor instance, invitations for our Ministers to visit Israel have been turned down.  \n\n76 \n \nTechnical cooperation through Israel’s official International Development \nCooperation Programme has been stalled. The request for an Israeli airline to operate \ndirect flights from Israel to Mauritius this year has not been acceded to. As a result \nof the war on a few countries like Jordan, Bahrain, Turkey, Honduras, South Africa, \nChad and Chile as well, they have recalled their ambassadors from Israel whilst \nothers like Belize, Bolivia, Colombia and Nicaragua have severed diplomatic \nrelations with Israel. \nIt is felt that the severance of diplomatic ties is of an extreme order as this might \nadversely affect any possible influence, dialogue and communication by Mauritius at the \nmulti-lateral level for sustainable peace in the Middle East region. Maintaining our current \nstance, albeit at a minimum level, leaves the window open for Mauritius to advocate for a \npeaceful discussion between all parties. It is felt that maintaining a meaningful channel of \ndiscussion with the Israeli side is, in fact, in the interest of the Palestinian people.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (c) of the question, the House may wish to \nnote that Mauritius has been directly involved in international legal actions concerning \nPalestine notably through its participation in the proceedings at the International Court of \nJustice. This involvement is aligned with our long-standing support of Mauritius for the \nPalestinian cause at the United Nations. \nIn July 2023, Mauritius was one of the 57 countries to submit a written statement to the \nICJ regarding the legality of Israel’s policies in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.  \nThe submission specifically addressed the legal consequences of Israel’s prolonged \noccupation, settlement and annexation of Palestinian territory. Mauritius also participated in \nthe oral proceedings at the ICJ in February 2024. \nIn its presentation, Mauritius drew parallels between the Israeli occupation and the \nChagos Archipelago case, and argued that if the ICJ found Israel’s occupation unlawful, the \nlatter would be obliged to end it consistent with the 2019 ICJ ruling on the Chagos case. \n In July 2024, the ICJ issued its advisory opinion concluding that Israel’s continued \npresence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is unlawful and must end. It also stated that all \nStates have an obligation not to recognise the illegal situation and to ensure Israel’s \ncompliance with international law. \n\n77 \n \nSubsequently, on 22 October 2025, the ICJ delivered another advisory opinion issued \npursuant to United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/79/232 of 19 December \n2024 concerning the obligations of Israel with respect to the presence and activities of the \nUnited Nations, other international organisations and third States in the occupied Palestinian \nterritories. \nThe court unanimously concluded that Israel is required to fulfil its obligations under \ninternational humanitarian law, including the duty to ensure that the population of the \nOccupied Palestinian Territory has access to the basic necessities of life, including food, \nwater, clothing, bedding, shelter, fuel, medical supplies and services. By ten votes to one, the \ncourt further determined that Israel must agree to facilitate by all means at its disposal relief \nschemes on behalf of the population of the Occupied Palestinian Territory so long as that \npopulation remains inadequately supplied, as has been the case in the Gaza Strip. \nThis includes humanitarian relief provided by the UN and its entities, most notably the \nUnited Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East as well as \nby other international organisations and Third States. Israel is also required not to obstruct or \nimpede search relief efforts.  \nFurthermore, the ICJ unanimously affirmed Israel’s obligation to respect the prohibition \non forcible transfer and deportation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and the prohibition \non the use of starvation of civilians as a weapon of warfare.  \nThe ICJ will now forward the advisory opinion to the United Nations General \nAssembly, where a resolution is expected to be drafted by Member States, that first table that \nresolution for an advisory opinion in December 2024. \nConsistent with its policy of support to the principal of international law and the rights \nof the Palestinian people, Mauritius will support any UNGA resolution that would seek to \nimplement the advisory opinion of the ICJ. Mauritius will, therefore, continue to support all \ninitiatives at the level of the United Nations, African Union and relevant multilateral fora \nwhich are in accordance with international law and which will contribute to bringing about a \njust, peaceful, comprehensive and lasting solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict based on the \nsanctity of the Two-State solution. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you have a question, hon. Etwareea? \n\n78 \n \nMr Etwareea: Yes, please. L’honorable ministre des Affaires étrangères, peut-il nous \ndire si le pays peut participer à l’effort international de soigner des blessés résultant des \nbombardements israéliens à Gaza ? \nMr Ramful: Can you repeat the question? \nThe Deputy Speaker: Repeat the question. \nMr Etwareea : Est-ce que notre pays peut participer à l’effort international de soigner \ndes blessés résultant des bombardements israéliens sur Gaza ? \nMr Ramful: Yes, this is a very interesting question. We will look into it and if there is \nthat possibility, we will definitely participate dans cet élan de solidarité. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Savanne and Black River! \nBAIE DU CAP & COTEAU RAFFIN – SHORTAGE OF WATER SUPPLY – \nWATER TANKERS & ALTERNATIVE ARRANGEMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/945",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 945,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/945) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to shortage of water \nsupply in the regions of Baie du Cap and Coteau Raffin, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain information as to whether any request has been made for the installation of 10,000 litre \nwater tankers thereat and, if so, indicate – \n(a) \nwhere matters stand, and \n(b) \nthe alternative arrangements made in instances where the supply of water through \nwater lorries could not be availed of.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden : M. le président, concernant la partie (a) de la question, la CWA \nm’informe qu’un réservoir de 10 m³, donc 1000 Litres, a été installé le long de Reserve Road \nprès du ‘Domaine Ramphul’ à Baie du Cap. \n(Interruptions) \nCe réservoir est régulièrement alimenté par des camions-citernes de la CWA assurant \nainsi un soulagement temporaire – je dis bien temporaire – aux habitants notamment, pendant \nla saison de restriction. \nConcernant la partie (b) de la question, j’en ai parlé à la CWA et elle m’a informé \nqu’elle propose d’installer trois réservoirs d’eau de 30 m³ chacun et de construire une station \nde pompage à Contour Prunes afin de capter l’eau du forage d’agraires. \n\n79 \n \nLes travaux seront réalisés en interne par la CWA et devraient débuter dans la troisième \nsemaine de novembre, le mois prochain, 2025. Leur durée est de huit semaines, deux mois. \nLe projet terminé, il n’y aura plus besoin d’intervention de camions-citernes dans les régions \nde Contour Prunes et Baie du Cap, assurant ainsi un approvisionnement en eau fiable et \ncontinu aux habitants de la zone. \nEn ce qui concerne Coteau Raffin, afin d’améliorer l’approvisionnement en eau à \nCoteau Raffin, la CWA mène actuellement une étude de faisabilité pour l’installation d’un \nCPF, (Containerised Pressure Filter) d’une capacité quotidienne de 2000 m³ sur la Rivière \nBois Noir. Grâce à cette production d’eau supplémentaire dirigée vers le réservoir de Bois-\nPuant, le nombre d’heures d’approvisionnement quotidienne devrait augmenter. \nM. le président, je tiens à le souligner que mon ministère et la CWA travaillons \nactuellement sur le nouveau protocole de distribution afin de se préparer au déficit hydrique \nattendu dans les semaines et dans les mois à venir. La situation sur l’île et dans les réservoirs \nseront surveillés quotidiennement et des mesures coordonnées seront prises pour renforcer \nl’intervention dans les zones les plus touchées par les coupures d’eau. Merci. \nThe Deputy Speaker: B/946 has been withdrawn. So, we go to the hon. Third Member \nfor Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien. \nGINGER PLANTATION – LOCAL PRODUCTION & IMPORTS – UNFAIR \nCOMPETITION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/946",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 946,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/946) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nwhether, in regard to ginger, he will state whether he is in presence of representations from \nplanters thereof as to any unfair competition to which they are facing from importers thereof \nand, if so – \n(a) \nindicate the measures his Ministry proposes to take in relation thereto, \nand \n(b) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Agricultural Marketing Board, \ninformation as to whether consideration could be given for the local production \nthereof to be purchased at a guaranteed price and be given priority on sale.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n\n80 \n \nAFRICAN NETWORK INFORMATION CENTRE – PRESERVATION OF \nINTEGRITY – ACTIONS TAKEN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/947",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 947,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/947) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in \nregard to the African Network Information Centre, he will state the key actions taken to \npreserve the integrity thereof, indicating where matters stand as at to date.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul:  Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, on the outset, I wish to inform the House that \nthe African Network Information Centre, also known as AFRINIC, is a company limited by \nguarantee incorporated under the laws of Mauritius.  \nAFRINIC is the designated Regional Internet Registry for the African continent which \nimplies that is manages and issues all the IP addresses that are used in the African region. \nHowever, due to one of the Members, Cloud Innovation, there were a lot of points of \ncontention that arose and unfortunately, allegedly, as well, many of the IP addresses that were \nmeant for use in the African region were being used outside of Africa. That too, not for \nlawful but allegedly again, unlawful purposes and this has been ongoing for a long number of \nyears. \nWhen we took government, we started addressing this problem because AFRINIC for \nMauritius represents a very important symbol that puts Mauritius on the digital map of \nAfrica. \nSo, this institution could have based in any other African country but it is based in \nMauritius and that is a matter of pride for us. With the involvement with AFRINIC of the \nprevious government, we ran the risk of losing AFRINIC to other countries in Africa. But \nthanks to the effort of the hon. Attorney General – whom I thank very much – and also the \nhon. Prime Minister, we managed to find, to help and to support find a solution to AFRINIC. \nAFRINIC had been the object of a spate of litigation by Cloud Innovation Ltd, one of \nits own resource members, culminating into a receiver being appointed by the Supreme Court \nat the instance of Cloud Innovation Ltd. As a consequence, AFRINIC being placed in \nreceivership and because it was placed in receivership, no new IP addresses could be issued \nbetween November 2024 and July 2025. AFRINIC was the object of a compulsory winding-\nup petition by Cloud Innovation Ltd and this was very dangerous for Africa and within the \nAfrican digital space, it was known and it was perceived that the Judiciary of Mauritius was \nnot handling the case properly. \nNow, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the state of affairs of AFRINIC has caused a lot of \nunease within the regional and international internet community, thereby undermining the \n\n81 \n \nreputation of Mauritius as a jurisdiction internationally. To preserve the integrity thereof, a \nset of actions have been undertaken – I will not go to the details of those actions but I table \nthe list of the actions. Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Table it. Yes, you have a supplementary question? \nMr Luckeeram: Could the hon. Minister please inform the House what is being done \nto bring back African IP addresses from Asia. \nDr. Ramtohul: I would like to thank the hon. Member for this supplementary question. \nNow that the Board has been established, the Board will define the action plan with regard to \nrecuperating the IP addresses of Africa that are being used outside. \nSo, it will be up to the Board to act on this. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nBRAZIL – 30TH UNITED NATIONS CLIMATE CHANGE CONFERENCE – \nINITIATIVES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/948",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 948,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/948) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister \nof Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in regard to the 30th \nUnited Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30) scheduled to be held in Brazil in \nNovember 2025, he will state whether participation thereto is being envisaged, indicating if \nany negotiation will be held to secure funding support from the Climate Justice Fund for \nAfrica for transformative climate action for grass root initiatives in support to local \ncommunities affected by climate change.",
      "answer": "Mr Bhagwan: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the 30th session of the Conference of Parties, \nthat is, COP30 to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change will be held \nfrom 10th November to 21st November in Belém, Brazil. \nAs a party to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, \nMauritius will participate in the COP30 with the hon. Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional \nIntegration and International Trade leading the delegation.  \nThe delegation will comprise the Chief Commissioner of the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly, the Permanent Secretary and Director of Climate Change of my Ministry as one \nMinister Counsellor for the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and \nInternational Trade. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in the context of the climate negotiations, my Ministry, in its \ncapacity have a national focal point to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate \n\n82 \n \nChange, has the collaboration of stakeholders ministries and departments and stakeholders in \nRodrigues prepared a national position which has been approved by Government on 10 \nOctober 2025. The national position paper will support the technical negotiations as well as \nthe preparation of the different statements which the head of the delegation will deliver in the \nplenary sessions and presidency events on priority teams including our call to the \ninternational community in respect of climate change. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Climate Justice Impact Fund for Africa which was \nestablished in 2021 and supported by the governments of Sweden and the Netherlands \ntargeted community-based organisations, non-governmental organisations and think tanks by \nproviding innovative and rapid response growth funding to support grassroots initiatives and \nmovements in their efforts to address climate change and promote climate justice. \nI am informed that the Fund launches expression of interest at intervals which are \ndecided by the partners. Representatives from the above-mentioned organisations from \neligible including Mauritius can apply directly to that Fund to benefit from that window of \nopportunity. The call of proposals for this year was closed in August 2025 and new \nsubmission could await the next call for proposal. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, you have a supplementary question? \nMr François: Just one supplementary, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. May I ask the hon. \nMinister whether the Republic of Mauritius submitted on time its updated Third Nationally \nDetermined Contribution (NDC 3.0) climate action plan to the United Nations Framework \nConvention on Climate Change (UNFCC)? \nMr Bhagwan: We submitted well in advance. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. The hon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and \nRose Belle! \nQUATRE SŒURS-BOIS DES AMOURETTES – WATERFRONTS – CLEANING, \nMAINTENANCE & EMBELLISHMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/949",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 949,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/949) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, \nin regard to the recently constructed waterfronts along the coastal regions of Quatre Sœurs to \nBois des Amourettes, he will state whether – \n\n83 \n \n(a) \nthe National Environment Cleaning Authority (NECA) and/or any other unit \nunder the aegis of the Ministry has been assigned the responsibility for the \ncleaning and maintenance thereof, and  \n(b) \nconsideration will be given to allowing non-governmental organisations to \ncontribute in the embellishment thereof through the planting of coastal and \nornamental plants.",
      "answer": "Mr Bhagwan: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed that the coastal stretch from Quatre Sœurs to Bois des Amourettes within the district \nboundary of Grand Port contains 21 proclaimed public beaches, all of which fall under the \nresponsibility of the Beach Authority. This figure includes seven beaches which were recently \nredeveloped into waterfronts and officially proclaimed as public beaches in December 2024. \nCurrent cleaning services across these 21 public beaches are being provided by the Beach \nAuthority and Mauri-Facilities Management Company Limited, both entities falling under the \naegis of my Ministry and also by private contractors. Additionally, personnel from the Beach \nAuthority undertake regular repairs and maintenance of amenities and infrastructure across \nall 21 public beaches. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (b) of the question, my Ministry maintains an \nopen policy regarding collaboration with Non-Governmental Organisations and the private \nsector for embellishment works which are effected under the supervision and technical \nguidance of my Ministry. I also wish to inform the House that my Ministry, through the \nBeach Authority, Mauri-Facilities Management Company Limited with the collaboration of \nthe private sector, the District Council of Grand Port and NGOs, is planning to organise a \nlarge-scale cleanliness campaign during the first week of December 2025 along this coastal \nstretch to further uplift the environment of this vital zone. \nMy hon. friend and colleague and his other colleagues of the constituency will be kept \ninformed of the programme. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \nMODIFIED MOTOR VEHICLES – NOISE POLLUTION – REGULATION, \nPOLICING & MONITORING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/950",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 950,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/950) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change \n\n84 \n \nwhether, in regard to noise pollution emanating from modified exhaust systems or loud sound \nequipment installed in motor vehicles, he will state if consideration will be given for – \n(a) \nthe strengthening of existing environmental noise regulations; \n(b) \nregular policing and monitoring of noise emission; \n(c) \ndesignating quiet zones and strict implementation of the legislation near schools \nand hospitals, and  \n(d) \nthe launching of awareness campaigns.",
      "answer": "Mr Bhagwan: Thank you. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it will be a bit of a long reply. Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that section 2(1)… \nThe Deputy Speaker: If it is a long reply, you can circulate it. \nMr Bhagwan: No, no, it is technical also. I can explain to my hon. Friends. Section \n2(1)(j) of the Fifth Schedule of the Environment Act 2024 makes provision for the Chief \nNational Transport Commissioner of the National Land Transport Authority to be designed \nenforcing agency in relation to smoke and noise emission by motor vehicles. Items 8, 12, 181 \nand 200 of the Fourth Schedule of the Road Traffic Act also provide for provision of fixed \npenalties or offenses in relation to noise for modified exhaust system.  \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, with a view to strengthening deterrence and curb \ndown noise pollution from modified exhaust systems, the fixed penalty is falling in the range \nof Rs1,000 to Rs5,000 has now been increased to Rs10,000 as from 09 October 2025 through \nthe Finance Act. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in addition to the fixed penalties, Regulation 20 of the Road \nTraffic (Control of Vehicle Emissions) Regulations 2002 provides that an authorised officer \nmay issue a prohibition notice where the test results of a motor vehicle’s noise emission test \nexceed the prescribed level specified in the Fifth Schedule of the Road Traffic (Control of \nVehicle Emissions) Regulations 2002 by 10 dB(A). The notice prohibits the operation of the \nvehicle on any road until the defect has been remedied to the satisfaction of the authorised \nofficer within 14 days as from the date of the notice. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, existing noise regulations are being enforced on \na daily basis by the Police de l’Environnement. Special operations concerning noise nuisance \nare also conducted with the support of the Divisional Headquarters of the Mauritius Police \nForce along with the Special Mobile Force, Police du Tourisme, the Emergency Response \n\n85 \n \nService and the Environmental Health Engineering Unit of the Ministry of Health and \nWellness during weekends. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I informed that during the period January 2025 to 23 October, \n43 and 89 contraventions have been established in respect to noise emanating from modified \nexhaust systems and loud sound equipment installed in motor vehicles respectively in breach \nof regulations – \n\nRegulations 83(2), 83(3) and 125 of the Road Traffic (Construction and Use of \nVehicles) Regulations 2010 concerning exhaust silencer system not in good and \nefficient working order and alternation of silencer respectively; \n\nRegulations 84 and 125 of the Road Traffic (Construction and Use of Vehicles); \n\nRegulations 2010 for using motor vehicles causing excessive noise and the \nEnvironment Protection (Control of Noise) Regulations 2022. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, concerning part (c) of the question, Regulation 4(4) of the \nEnvironment Protection (Control of Noise) Regulations 2022 stipulates that – \n“No person shall use or cause to be used a loud speaker, a loud hailer, an amplifier, a \nmusical instrument or any other electrical or mechanical device for producing sound, \nwithin a radius of 100 metres, and which unreasonably interferes with the proper \nrunning, of – \n(a) an educational or vocational institution during the normal hours of instruction;  \n(b) a health institution;  \n(c) a place of worship;  \n(d) a Court of Justice;  \n(e) the Municipal City Council [other municipal councils]; or  \n(f)  the Government House during the hours at which the National Assembly sits.” \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (d) of the question, the Information and \nEducation Division of my Ministry conducts ongoing awareness raising and sensitisation \nactivities targeting various groups, including youth, women, senior citizens, NGOs, schools, \nlocal communities and the general public. A broad range of environmental issues are \naddressed, including noise pollution. The awareness activities are delivered through talks, \nshort videos, radio spots, presentations, billboards and posters. From January 2025 to date, 55 \n\n86 \n \ntalks have been conducted for the benefit of various community groups. My Ministry will \nenhance mass awareness initiatives to support the national campaign aimed at improving the \nliving environment through stronger enforcement measures in collaboration with local \nauthorities. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Grand Baie and Poudre d’Or! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 6 – IRREGULAR WATER SUPPLY – PROPOSED \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/951",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 951,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/951) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the villages of Mont \nChoisy, Vale, Grand Bay, Fond du Sac, Sottise, Calodyne and Goodlands, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to the number \nof complaints received from the inhabitants of the said regions regarding irregular water \nsupply prevailing thereat since December 2024 to September 2025, indicating the measures \nbeing proposed for the provision of regular water supply thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: M. le président, je remercie l’honorable membre. Je suis informé par \nla Central Water Authority que les régions de Mont Choisy, Vale, Grand Baie, Fond du Sac, \nSottise, Calodyne, Goodlands ont des régimes d’approvisionnement en eau variant de 8 \nheures à 16 heures. Je suis également informé que le nombre total de plaintes concernant les \nrégions susmentionnées pour la période décembre 2024 à septembre 2025 concernant \nl’approvisionnement régulière en eau s’élève à 15,476.  \nPlusieurs raisons expliquent l’approvisionnement intermittent, irrégulier en eau dans \nces régions. D’abord – \n\nle vieillissement et la qualité des tuyaux, provoquant une baisse de pression, \nsurtout dans les parties élevées ; \n\nl’insuffisance des ressources en eau ; \n\nla capacité de stockage limitée des réservoirs existants par rapport à la demande \nen rapide augmentation ; \n\nles pannes de pompes ; \n\nles coupures de courant, et aussi \n\nles pertes sur le réseau de plus de 60% dans notre réseau de distribution. \n\n87 \n \nM. le président, depuis ma prise de fonction, j’ai fait le point sur la situation en eau \ndans le nord et mon intervention prioritaire a été d’accroître la mobilisation de l’eau dans le \nnord pour améliorer l’approvisionnement en eau des habitants. Ainsi, des nouveaux forages \nont été réalisés et mis en service au niveau des réservoirs de Bois Mangue, de Forbach, de \nFond du Sac, de Mapou, ce qui apportera des ressources en eau supplémentaires dans le \nréseau hydraulique – \n1) \nLe forage de Bois Mangue a été mis en service le 11 octobre 2025 – il y a \nquelques jours – en injectant environ 384 m3 d’eau par heure supplémentaire dans \nle réservoir de Bois Mangue pour alimenter Fond du Sac.  \n2) \nLe forage de Forbach a été mis en service le 16 octobre 2025 – la semaine \ndernière – qui alimente 4,400 m3 par jour d’eau supplémentaire dans le réseau des \ntuyaux de Lower Vale et Sottise. \n3) \nLe forage de Fond du Sac devrait être mis en service d’ici mi-novembre 2025 – le \nmois prochain – et alimentera le réseau de Fond du Sac. \n4) \nLe forage de Mapou injectera de l’eau supplémentaire dans le réservoir Old \nGoodlands d’ici fin octobre 2025 pour soutenir ces zones de service. \n5) \nUn autre forage sera réalisé à Endemika la première semaine de novembre 2025 \net injectera de l’eau dans le réservoir de Mon Loisir Rouillard. \nD’autres projets d’amélioration d’eau à moyen et à long terme de la CWA comprennent \nle renouvellement des tuyaux à – \n\nPointe aux Cannoniers ; \n\nGoodlands ; \n\nGrand Baie ; \n\nPereybère ; \n\nUpper Vale ; \n\nCap Malheureux, et \n\nLa modernisation de réservoir de câblage à Poudre d’Or. \nDonc, ces tuyaux vont être renouvelés. C’est l’engagement du gouvernement indien de \nnous donner R 2,8 milliards pour le Pipe Replacement Programme. \n\n88 \n \nM. le président, les régions dont nous parlons, aujourd’hui, connaissent une demande \ncroissante en eau en raison du développement rapide et continu de ces zones. L’augmentation \ndes activités résidentielles, commerciales et infrastructurelles a naturellement exercé une \npression accrue sur l’approvisionnement existant. \nM. le président, je viens également souligner que mon ministère, en collaboration avec \ntoutes les parties concernées, a élaboré un plan Marshall pour le secteur de l’eau afin \nd’essayer de remédier à la situation à court et moyen terme. Je dis bien d’essayer. Ce cadre \nvise – \n\nà renforcer la mobilisation des ressources en eau dans les mois et dans les années \nà venir ; \n\nà diversifier le mix hydrique ; \n\nà améliorer l’efficacité du réseau de distribution – changement de tuyaux. Il nous \nfaut impérativement changer ces tuyaux pour ne pas perdre 60 % de l’eau que \nnous mettons. \nDonc, comme je disais, M. le président, ce plan Marshall, principalement pour le Nord, \nva essayer d’augmenter la capacité de l’eau souterraine et des rivières pour pouvoir alimenter \nces régions. Nous essayons de tout faire pour améliorer cette distribution. En passant, je \nremercie les membres de la circonscription numéro 5 et numéro 6 pour l’aide qu’ils nous \ndonnent en ce qui concerne la communication avec les habitants. Merci. \nPROBATION OFFICERS DUTIES – REMUNERATION REVIEW & REMEDIAL \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/952",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 952,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/952) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to cases of \nchildren with serious behavioural concerns, she will state if she is aware of the request made \nby Probation Officers for a review of their remuneration in respect of the duties they are now \nrequired to perform through the drawing up of parenting support intervention plans and \ncarrying out of home visits thereinto as per the provisions of the Children’s Act 2020 and, if \nso, indicate the measures the Ministry intends to take to address this issue as the failure to \n\n89 \n \nperform same is adversely affecting families, legal proceedings and the safety of the children \nconcerned.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River, last \nquestion for today! \nFLIC EN FLAC, CASCAVELLE, TAMARIN, LA GAULETTE & LE MORNE \nREGIONS – IRREGULAR WATER SUPPLY – REMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/953",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 953,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/953) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the irregular water supply in the \nregions of Flic en Flac, Cascavelle, Tamarin, La Gaulette and Le Morne, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of complaints, if any, received in relation thereto, and  \n(b) \nwhether any survey has been undertaken to identify the root cause of the problem, \nindicating the – \n(i) \nactions, if any, taken in relation thereto, and  \n(ii) \nurgent immediate remedial measures being considered.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: M. le président, je suis informé par la Central Water Authority que les \nrégions de l’île comprenant Flic-en-Flac, Cascavelle, Tamarin, La Gaulette et Le Morne sont \nconsidérées comme les zones les plus soumises au stress hydrique du pays. Ces régions \nconnaissent une pénurie d’eau principalement en raison de la capacité de production limitée \npar rapport au rythme rapide de développement et à la forte demande des consommateurs, en \nparticulier pendant la saison touristique de pointe et les développements résidentiels en cours. \nDonc, expansion insuffisante des infrastructures hydrauliques, pertes d’eau dans les tuyaux, \ncomme je le disais un peu plus tôt, et variations climatiques saisonnières. \n   M. le président, je suis informé que le nombre de plaintes pour absence d’eau reçues à \nla CWA concernant les régions susmentionnées pour la période du 17 octobre 2025 au 23 \noctobre 2025 s’élève à 122. Pour essayer de remédier à la situation, la CWA a mis en œuvre \nquelques projets dans la région. Ainsi, environ 14.6 km de tuyaux ont été remplacés par la \n\n90 \n \nCWA dans la région de Flic-en-Flac. La CWA a également installé un CPF à Rivière \nRempart, augmentant la production du réservoir de Beau Songes de 2000 mètres cubes par \njour. Cette amélioration bénéficie directement à Cascavelle et Flic-en-Flac. Il est prévu \nd’installer un deuxième CPF le mois prochain. Pas dans les semaines à venir, mais le mois \nprochain.  \nÀ Tamarin, un nouveau forage à Pierrefonds, Beau Songes a été foré pour renforcer \nl’approvisionnement à Tamarin, notamment pendant la saison difficile. \nL’infrastructure hydraulique existante à la CWA peine à faire face à la consommation \ncroissante d’eau à mesure que les projets touristiques et de logements augmentent à Los \nAngeles. Je ne savais même pas qu’il y avait un endroit qui s’appelle Los Angeles ! Je \nconnaissais New York et Manhattan, mais Los Angeles, je ne savais pas. Los Angeles – \nsecteur de La Gaulette. Pour pallier à ce problème, j’ai été informé que la CWA prévoit \nd’installer un nouveau CPF afin d’augmenter les débits d’eau alimentant le réservoir de Bois \nPuant. Une fois opérationnel, ce projet devrait améliorer la fiabilité de l’approvisionnement \nen eau à La Gaulette. \nLe village du Morne est normalement alimenté par un CPF sur la Rivière Baie du Cap. \nEn cas de fortes pluies ou d’eau boueuse, le CPF doit être temporairement coupé. Dans ce \ncas, l’eau est généralement détournée du réservoir de l’Embrasure pour alimenter le village \nd’à côté. De plus, la CWA a récemment renouvelé environ 2.8 km de tuyaux dans le village \ndu Morne. M. le président, alors que cette région est en plein développement, elle continue de \nfaire face à d’importants défis en matière d’eau. Des efforts concertés sont déployés pour \nmoderniser les infrastructures, optimiser la production et renforcer la résilience du système en \nétudiant la possibilité de mobiliser des ressources supplémentaires en eau grâce à d’autres \nsources potentielles d’eaux souterraines et de surface. La collaboration du secteur privé est \nactuellement sollicitée dans cette région pour mobiliser davantage d’eau douce. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Time is over! Thank you. \nThe Table has been advised that the following PQs have been withdrawn: B/913, \nB/954, B/956, B/957, and B/958. \nMOTION \n\n91 \n \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I beg to move that all the business on \ntoday’s Order Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) Standing Order 10. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Members, Madam Speaker will resume the Chair. \nAt this stage, Madam Speaker took the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. You may be seated! \nPUBLIC BILLS \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the following Bills were read a first time – \n(i) \nThe Criminal Code (Amendment No. 2) Bill (No. XXVI of 2025); \n(ii) \nThe Court of Rodrigues Jurisdiction (Amendment) Bill (No. XXV of 2025). \nSecond Reading \nTHE CRIMINAL CODE (AMENDMENT NO. 2) BILL  \n(NO. XXVI OF 2025) \nOrder for Second Reading read. \n(4.04 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that the Criminal Code \n(Amendment No. 2) Bill (No. XXVI of 2025) be read a second time. \nMadam Speaker, in 2021, this House enacted an amendment to the Criminal Code, \nintroducing a new section 76B. Its purpose, at the time, was clear. It sought to criminalise the \ndistribution or production of coins, stamps, maps, or other official objects or documents that \nmisrepresented our sovereignty over any part of our national territory, especially over the \n\n92 \n \nChagos Archipelago. It was a legal tool crafted in response to a very specific challenge: the \npersistent disregard for our territorial integrity.  \nThe law must be understood against its historical background. The fight for justice over \nChagos began even at the Lancaster House Conference for Independence, when Sir \nSeewoosagur Ramgoolam objected and opposed the then deal to dismantle Chagos from our \nterritory, and also, after independence. \nI wish here to pay tribute today to the heroes of that struggle. Among them were \ncourageous Chagossians, including women such as the late Lisette Talate and Charlesia \nAlexis who undertook hunger strikes in the 1970s. There was Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam \nwho always saw the injustice of the pre-independence consultations for what they were: pure \nblackmail. In 1980, he thus secured a historical resolution for the organisation of African \nUnity calling for the return of Chagos. He also raised the matter at the UN General Assembly.  \nThere was also the now Deputy Prime Minister, hon. Paul Bérenger, and the MMM, \nwho brought the issue firmly onto the national political conscience. And yes, there was also \nSir Anerood Jugnauth who agreed to follow the plan of action that we had laid down with our \nlawyer, Mr Philip Sands K.C., and he went to the UN and the Hague in 2018, as we had \nplanned if we were to win at the Tribunal of the Law of the Sea.  \nHistory will remember that our victory today is built upon their unwavering efforts. \nCredit should also be given to a number of NGOs in Mauritius and abroad; and individuals \nwho contributed in a significant manner to the struggle for our sovereignty.  \nMadam Speaker, in 2010, as Prime Minister, I chose to take our struggle to a new level \nfor the first time, to bring the matter before the courts, the Arbitral Tribunal for the Law of the \nSea. It was a deliberate strategy: to build, step by step, a solid foundation in international law \nfor our claim.  \nMany thought we would not win but we did. In 2015, we secured our first major \nsuccess before that Tribunal, with the ruling against the proposed British Marine Protected \nArea. And the strategy I had set in motion continued after my term in office and ultimately \nled, in 2019, to the favourable Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice.  \nIt authoritatively determined that the Chagos Archipelago is and has always formed an \nintegral part of the territory of Mauritius, and that the process of decolonisation of Mauritius \n\n93 \n \nwas not completed upon its accession to independence in view of the unlawful excision of the \nChagos Archipelago from its territory. \nSubsequently, in 2021, a Special Chamber of the International Tribunal for the Law of \nthe Sea delivered in the Maritime Boundary Delimitation Case between Mauritius and \nMaldives, a judgement in which it held that the determination made by the International \nCourt of Justice in its Advisory Opinion of 25 February 2019 are legally binding and \nconfirmed that Mauritius has undisputed sovereignty of the Chagos Archipelago. \nNow, despite this clear determination of the International Court of Justice and the \nInternational Tribunal of the Law of the Sea, the United Kingdom continued to cause stamps \nand coins to be issued purportedly on behalf of the so-called ‘British Indian Ocean Territory’.  \nSome individuals, groups and entities continued to do as if Mauritius did not have \nsovereignty of the Chagos Archipelago. They performed actions that could only be validated \nby a State in the exercise of its sovereign powers. In fact, Madam Speaker, in Article 2 of the \nAgreement we signed with the UK in relation to the Chagos, it is now expressly stated that \nthe issuance of such coins or stamps can only be done by Mauritius as a sovereign State and \nnobody else.  \nSection 76B of the Criminal Code was conceived in a specific context where it was \nintended to apply only to expressions of sovereign authority on the part of a foreign State or \nan entity acting on behalf of such State.  \nBut as with all laws, Madam Speaker, context matters and context evolves.  \nToday, Mauritius stands on a very different footing. In May of this year, Mauritius and \nthe United Kingdom signed a new Treaty concerning the Chagos Archipelago, in which our \nsovereignty is unequivocally recognised. Article 1 of that Treaty speaks for itself, and let me \nquote – \n“Mauritius is sovereign over the Chagos Archipelago in its entirety, including Diego \nGarcia.” \nThat solemn recognition, therefore, changes everything.  \nThe raison d’être of section 76B, therefore, no longer exists. Our sovereignty is no \nlonger being questioned by any State or any international organisation. The law has served its \npurpose, and this means that it should now make way for a new chapter.  \n\n94 \n \nBut the point is deeper, Madam Speaker, and it is important that our nation hears it from \nthis House. Section 76B was a shield. It was not meant as a sword, it was a shield. It \ndefended us against a persistent and well-funded campaign to deny our sovereignty. It was \nnever intended to muzzle our own people, or to criminalise debate.  \nNow, having prevailed in our long struggle for recognition, diplomatically, legally and \nmorally, we must ensure that the laws we keep on our books reflect the confidence of a \nsovereign nation. This shield should not become a cage. It has lost its raison d’être.  \nOur democracy is founded on liberty, including the liberty to debate matters of national \nimportance, even passionately. In this regard, Section 76B may create misgivings. When it \nwas passed, some feared that one could, by merely discussing the Chagos, risk prosecution if \nthe law is instrumentalised in a perverse manner, that it so often did under the previous \nregime. And as hon. Reza Uteem noted during the debates at the time, it did contain some \nserious inconsistencies and limitations.  \nWe are not here today to rewrite history or to criticise a law that actually served a \nmoment of necessity. It was introduced with good intentions. It demonstrated our \ndetermination to assert our sovereignty while some countries and individuals did not fully \nacknowledge so. \nBut today, clinging to that law would be counterproductive.  \nIt risks giving ammunition to those who, even now, try to portray Mauritius as an \nintolerant country of dissent, or oppressive towards Chagossians who hold different views. It \nrisks sustaining an outdated perception that our sovereignty must be defended by legal force \nrather than by the strength of the law and the weight of international legitimacy that we have \nearned.  \nNo, Madam Speaker, even those very few Chagossians who deny our sovereignty, very \noften for very personal reasons, linked to their own trajectories, whether they live here or \nabroad, have the right to have their views and do not need to worry about facing criminal \ncharges against them.  \nRepealing section 76B is an act of democratic self-confidence.  \nIt says to the world that –  \n Mauritius has no fear of the words.  \n\n95 \n \n Mauritius does not criminalise ideas.  \n Mauritius lives up to its constitutional promises that guided our struggle for \njustice.  \nMadam Speaker, as we repeal this provision, we must also acknowledge a wider \nchallenge.  \nToo many laws remain on our books that criminalise speech in ways that are out of \nplace in a modern democracy. This is the legacy, in part, of colonial rule. And the time has \ncome for a broader review.  \nWe will move forward with reforms to ensure that offences such as “criminal \ndefamation” or “scandalising the court” or “outrage against public or religious morality” do \nnot unduly suppress legitimate expression, but instead target true harm, such as incitement to \nviolence or hatred. Abusive creations of the previous regime, such as – I laugh when I think \nof it – “causing annoyance”. Clauses of ICTA will have to be reviewed as well. \nThe Attorney General’s Office is moving ahead with a comprehensive review inspired \nby the Preliminary Report of Geoffrey Robertson K.C., which I had commissioned back in \n2013. He had produced a report which has been squarely ignored by the previous regime for a \nwhole decade. \nMadam Speaker, there are indeed such areas where conduct is currently criminalised \ndespite the fact that there is no victim. No victim is being harmed or where there is no \nprejudice that cannot simply be sanctioned by civil proceedings. Criminal sanctions should \nnot be society’s default instrument in those contexts. \nAnd whenever it comes to striking a balance, such as between privacy and the public \ninterest, the dignity of individuals and the right of the press will be guided by strong \nconstitutional principles and by our longstanding respect for human rights.  \nMadam Speaker, our identity is built on the foundations of democracy, the rule of law \nand dignity for every Mauritian, including our compatriots of Chagossian origins, who may \nwell hold diverse perspectives on resettlement and their future but that is their right.  \nThere can now be only one single flag over the Chagos, our sovereign State. One \nsovereign State. One nation.  \nAs the ratification process proceeds, we sincerely and successfully hope through the \nsteps at the British Parliament, it is important that we dispel the unwarranted lies about our \n\n96 \n \nnational character. We are a sovereign nation which values all its friends, but which also \nstands by its word. We pledge to honour the commitments made in the historical treaty of \nMay 2025. \nLet us, therefore, stand today not only united but unafraid. Repealing section 76B is the \nnatural step of a sovereign nation that has prevailed. It shows maturity. It shows that we are \nun État de droit. It shows that we trust our people. And it confirms that our moral victory \ndoes not need to be secured through the criminal law but through the strength of the truth \nonly.  \nWith these words, I commend the Bill to the House.  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Narsinghen. \n(4.18 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International \nTrade (Mr H. Narsinghen): Madam Speaker, I have the honour to address the House on the \nCriminal Code (Amendment No. 2) Bill (No. XXVI of 2025).  \nThe repeal of section 76B of the Criminal Code is not a mere act of legislative \nhousekeeping. It is a meaningful and impactful reform that aligns our law with the new \ninternational reality that is, the sovereignty of Mauritius over the Chagos Archipelagos is \nrecognised, affirmed and operational.  \nI have listened carefully to the Prime Minister. It is true that when the law was passed \nin 2021, possibly, it was passed with good intention. I would say it was a sort of necessary \nevil. I will explain why there were some very important shortcomings in the law at that point \nin time.  \nThe Prime Minister also explained the context and how, with the repealing of the law, \nwe are again consolidating democracy but I would like to hammer on the context, Madam \nSpeaker.  \nSection 76B was enacted to criminalise the so-called misrepresentation of the \nsovereignty of Mauritius by prohibiting maps, stamps, coins or documents depicting Chagos \nas anything other than Mauritian. At that time, our sovereignty was still being contested \ninternationally. The former approach sought to defend our claims symbolically through \ncriminal law and I lay emphasis on the symbolical approach.  \n\n97 \n \nMadam Speaker, as explained by the Prime Minister, the context has changed \nfundamentally. In May 2025, Mauritius and the United Kingdom, as you know, signed a \nlandmark treaty by which the United Kingdom unequivocally, as pointed out by the Prime \nMinister, recognised Mauritian sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelagos. The British \nParliament, a few days back, has also ratified this outcome and the territorial dispute that \nendured since 1965, is for all practical purposes, resolved.     \nKeeping section 76B, I would say, would be redundant and maybe a risk, making our \nlaw appear disconnected from the facts and recent events. Therefore, repeal is necessary to \nensure our statutory book reflects the national truth. Mauritius is no longer asserting or \nclaiming sovereignty; it now exercises the sovereignty. We have moved from what I would \nqualify as a defensive stance to proactive governance. So, how we got here, that is from \nlitigation to recognition? \nMadam Speaker, the road to the treaty was arduous, exacting and painstaking as \nexplained by the Prime Minister. The ICJ Advisory Opinion in February 2019 found the \nseparation of Chagos in 1965 to be unlawful and urged the UK to end its administration as \nrapidly as possible. The United Nation General Assembly Resolutions endorsed the ICJ’s \nview and called for international support to complete our decolonisation.  \nAnd also, as explained by the Prime Minister, the International Tribunal on Law of the \nSea reaffirmed Mauritian sovereign rights and clarified maritime entitlement in the Indian \nOcean. At that point in time, this was triggered by the Prime Minister and you will remember \nhow the Prime Minister and his team, at that point in time, chose deliberately one very \nfamous international barrister, Ian Brownlee, who unfortunately passed away, and \nsubsequently it was the Prime Minister and his team who chose also Mr Philippe Sands. \nBuilding on these milestones required persistent diplomacy. Coordinated between the \nPrime Minister’s office, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the DPM’s office, the AG’s office, \nspearheaded by the AG himself, moved us from principle to agreement. By early 2025, \nnegotiations, as you know Madam Speaker, culminated in the treaty that the UK Parliament \nhas ratified as I mentioned before. So, the final vote of the House of Lord will soon close the \nchapter.  \nThe sceptic and birds of bad omen did not believe in the historical achievement. They \nwere making a mockery of our patient and quiet diplomacy. They underestimated the \ncapacity of our Prime Minister, the DPM and the Attorney General and our Ministry of \n\n98 \n \nForeign Affairs to be real champions of what I would qualify as quiet and efficient \ndiplomacy. This is not simply a legal milestone; it is the completion of decolonisation. So, \nthis is what I would also qualify as quiet diplomacy over noisy posturing as it happened with \nthe previous regime. \nThis achievement was not born out provocation or theatrics; it was delivered by calm, \ncredible and respectful diplomacy. The kind that builds trust not tension. Grand standing may \nsteer applause at home, I agree but it seldom changes minds abroad. What delivered results \nwere clarity of purpose, legal consistency and diplomatic composure. No comparison with a \ndiplomacy as in the past anchored in vulgarity if you still remember, tempestuousness under \nthe previous regime. Fiery declarations may sound patriotic but unfortunately, does not yield \nresults. What works is credibility and consistency as I mentioned. This is what brought our \nvictory.  \nTherefore, it is undeniable that the deal struct by the actual Government is far better \nthan the one supposedly concluded by the previous regime although not perfect, I would \nagree. Diplomacy, as I mention very often, in international forums, is an art and a craft. So, \nfrom optics to outcomes, while previous approaches sought symbolical victories through \ndomestic \ncriminalisation, \nthis \nGovernment \npursued \nrecognition, \nresolution \nand \nimplementation. \nThe treaty not only affirms sovereignty; it establishes frameworks for   co-operation, \nvery important, and environment, sustainable development and also what is important is the \nwelfare of the Chagossians. So, this is the sort of diplomacy with the new government that \ndelivers. We just not talk; we walk the talk.  \nNow, I am here also to explain, to certain extent I agree that the Prime Minister \nmentioned there was possibly good intention when the law was passed but Madam Speaker, \nyou will see that section 76B explicitly or implicitly try to cast, at that point in time, extra \nterritorial shadows – punishing acts committed outside Mauritius by non-nationals for how \nthey depicted our territory. \nAnd you know, as a small country, extra territorial law is rare, I would say a heavy tool, \njustified only for universally condemned offences, for example, terrorism, piracy, trafficking \nand also backed by strong international cooperation. For a small but respected state, laws \nwith global pretensions are neither credible or enforceable. They invite, very often, legal \nfiction and distract from substantive statecraft.  \n\n99 \n \nThe idea that Mauritius could prosecute a publisher in a foreign capital for a map was at \nbest, as I mentioned before, a symbolical posturing or, at worst, a legal absurdity. Sovereignty \nis secured by treaties and effective governance – this is what we did and this is what our hon. \nPrime Minister did –, not by unreachable criminal sanctions. \nRepeal also enables freedom, scholarship and confidence. Section 76B, at that point in \ntime, cast a Damocles sword over legitimate actors, publishers, NGOs, academics, \ncartographers, and journalists. Unfortunately, even if there was good intention, you will see \nthat ambiguity chilled discussion and research. As an ex-academic, I have always been \nchampioning academic freedom. \nWith sovereignty now settled, we should encourage writers and scholars to analyse \ndocuments and critic this chapter of our history. There is nothing wrong to criticise the \noutcome of what we got, without fear and without criminal liability. That is what confidence \nlooks like in a mature republic. For sure, we are a mature republic with this new Government \nnow. So, that is the rule of law and proportionality.  \nAnother shortcoming you will see is, generally, criminal provisions must be clear, \nnecessary and also enforceable. Unfortunately, when we analyse closely section 76B, it was \nvague. This has also been criticised by the Supreme Court in a landmark judgment and also \nthe law by restoring discipline to our criminal code and reserving penal sanctions only for \nreal harms, not for abstraction. \nLet me reassure the House, removing section 76B does not in any way weaken \nprotection of national integrity. Existing offences already guard the republic, for example, \nfraud, forgery, sedition and the National Flag Act. So, these are balanced and enforceable, \nMadam Speaker. You will also see, Madam Speaker, that this repeal is only a sort of step \nnumber one. At this point, I would invite the SLO and the Office of the AG to start more \ntechnical work to amend other laws. \nI am just making some recommendations. We must redefine baselines around Chagos \nand update coordinates of our EEZ – very important to update coordinates of the new EEZ \nthat we have – , redefine our continental shelf under UNCLOS and also to notify the Division \nfor Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea accordingly. This is not mere cartography, Madam \nSpeaker. It is the legal consolidation of our regained maritime space and resources.  \nRegarding fisheries, as I mentioned, this is only a first step. We will have to align the \nFisheries and Marine Resources Act and regulations to the new EEZ that we have. Also, what \n\n100 \n \nwe have to do is update licensing for all vessels operating the Chagos waters, extend \nmonitoring control and surveillance regarding Illegal Unreported and Unregulated Fishing \n(IUU) and IUU enforcement, expand marine control and satellite surveillance, and file \nupdated notifications within the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission – we know that the Deputy \nPrime Minister is doing a lot of work on that –, and relevant regional fisheries management \norganisations. \nSo, Madam Speaker, we also have to look at other laws. For example, look at how we \nare going to deliver special visa and special work permit when it comes to the archipelagos \nwith specific regulations for Chagos and Diego Garcia. Maybe there has to be a sort of co-\nmanagement. I am just giving some recommendations. \nMadam Speaker, you will see that the Chagos Archipelago is among the world’s most \npristine marine resources. Mainland environmental rules cannot simply be transplanted in the \ncontext of the Chagos Archipelago. I am sure my good friend, hon. Minister Rajesh Bhagwan \nand hon. Junior Minister Ms J. Bérenger, will look into the matter. We will need also, Madam \nSpeaker, a special EIA regime. We must establish a special EIA framework with lower \ntriggers, cumulative impact assessments and a dedicated Chagos environmental directorate \nfor permitting and monitoring. \nWe need also to redefine – I know that the British did it –, but we have to redefine the \nmarine parks and NPAs with the gain of the Chagos Archipelagos. Regarding regional \ncommitments, we must also mainstream our obligations, as I mentioned before, under the \nIOTC and the RFMOs, the Convention on Migratory Species and Migratory Flyways and \nadvance SDG14, that is, Life Below Water. \n We also have to revisit trade, customs and port state control. So, what I want to convey, \nMadam Speaker, is that this is a first step. We have to commend the SLO, the hon. Prime \nMinister and the hon. Attorney General for taking the initiative, but I am sure that lot of work \nremains to be done. I know that the hon. AG and his team at the SLO are working very hard. I \nhave just been mentioning some of the laws and regulations which have to be amended in \norder to mainstream the content of the treaty and what we have gained from the historical \ntreaty. \nThank you for your attention, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Junior Minister.  \n\n101 \n \nThose of you who have come to visit me must have noticed that I have gotten rid of the \nmap where the BIOT was still on the big map. So, if you have one in your office, you should \nhave a quick look and maybe get rid of the map. Make sure you get new ones! \nThank you very much. Let us break for tea for half an hour. We will come back at 5 \np.m. \nAt 4.33 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.15 p.m., with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated. Yes, hon. Minister! \nThe Minister of Housing and Land (Mr S. Mohamed): Thank you, Madam Speaker, \nas to other who have preceded me, I have listened very carefully to all the words that have \nbeen pronounced on this particular piece of proposed legislation. \nI was, therefore, duty-bound to go back to the Bill that was presented back on the 23rd \nof November 2021 when the then, hon. Prime Minister came to this House to present the \nCriminal Code (Amendment) Bill (No. XVI of 2021). I have gone through the Hansard and I \nhave noted therein that the background to this piece of legislation was what was being done \nin terms of Universal Postal Union – the issuing of coins, of stamps – but I went on further to \nsee that this Bill has made specific provisions to render it criminal, the fact that this was \nbeing done under instructions from a foreign State. \nIt is all well and good to come up with a piece of legislation but then all members in \nthis House will have to reflect on something. The question is, and I will limit myself to a very \nshort intervention where I will only comment on the legal aspect. What is the point of really \ncoming forward with a piece of legislation as they did and bring a new Section 76B of the \nlaw when the enforceability of that law itself was in question? The first question to ask \noneself is not only that and the second is how would that law have been enforced? \nSo, how can one enforce criminal law of the Republic of Mauritius on another State, on \nanother territory without the consent of the other State? When there is no international basis \nsuch as a treaty or even a mandate from the United Nations Security Council, that is the \nquestion. When I read all literature on this particular aspect, the first thing that comes up is: \nhow would you have enforced the law? \nSo, yes, true, they came up with a piece of legislation. Their aim was supposedly to \ninstil the sort of threat to criminalise the right to free speech and expression. But when you \n\n102 \n \nanalyse it, and this is what the literature says, is that the coin was not legal tender and the \nstamp was only a symbolical act. Therefore, the legality, therefore, the enforceability \ninternationally of that piece of legislation, I always had very strong doubts about it.  \nSecond element: criminalising speech on symbolical issues such as I have said: coins or \nstamps clearly could have called for constitutional challenges under the Constitution of \nMauritius that guarantees free expression. \nSo, just typical of the former government, coming up with pieces of legislation and \nwhen we analyse history after this particular amendment was brought, another question – was \nthere any action? The answer is no. Could there have been any action? I have put the question \nearlier and I do not believe there could have been. \nSo, I have listened to the hon. Prime Minister who made a very, very important speech \nin that he talks about the importance of trusting our democracy and the importance of trusting \nMauritians but also, I go further the importance of trusting our friends. That is the message of \nthis particular amendment brings forward today. \nAnother element that which I would like about is the fact that this debate is not about \nparty politics. It has never been about party politics. It is about the nation. It is about \nsovereignty. It is about nation building. It is about preserving national integrity. This is all it \nis about but when one reads the speech of the former Prime Minister, he uses those words but \nthe words he uses were empty because in fact when you read the concluding remarks of the \nhon. Prime Minister and the exchange he was having in this House – he was so much acting \nlike the leader of a political party and could not in any way show that he was a statesman \nbecause he was not one. He was attacking the now hon. Deputy Prime Minister, he was \nrefusing to set up a committee for us to work together on it – together, Opposition and \nGovernment – since it was a national debate. This is the attitude that was adopted by the \nformer Prime Minister.  \nMake the difference. Today, the actual hon. Prime Minister said this is how history has \nshown how every single political party in power has contributed. He explained how, where it \nstarted from. He went through history; he also made reference to the Late Sir Anerood \nJugnauth. \nBut the former government pretended as though the acted as though they were only \nones who had anything to do with this issue, make it purely a political matter, a party-\npolitical matter when it was not.  \n\n103 \n \nAnd now, I would like to conclude that that since it is a national issue where of the \nmembers of the PMSD and where is the hon. Leader of the Opposition? This is the debate \nabout territorial integrity, sovereignty of our nation and as the hon. Prime Minister has said: \nall through the years, every political leader has stood up and stood firm and he developed a \nstrategy and every step was important towards where we have reached today and when we \nlook at the seats today – empty.  \nMs Anquetil: As usual! \nMr Mohamed: But let me say, they have nothing to talk about on other issues or they \nnot want to say on other issues. \nCan you imagine Madam Speaker, that they have nothing to say, today, when it comes \nto the sovereignty, the rights of our nation, territorial integrity – they have nothing to say? \nSo, that is why I end on this because I would have wish that they could have been here. \nIt would have been a pleasure to hear them share their views. Yes, I would have had to make \nan effort but I would have listened to them. We would have listened to them because it is \nimportant for posterity. What would the history books say on a day when this is being argued \nand debated? They had an opportunity of coming here. The Constitution gave them those \nseats, recognised their right to be here, but still, they have chosen not to be here.  \nSo, let the record show that when the time came to take position, to add their voice to \nthe debate and to act as one people, they were absent. Thank you very much. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. hon. Minister! \nYes, Deputy Prime Minister! \n(5.24 p.m.) \n The Deputy Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, je tiens à saluer un très beau discours \nde l’honorable Premier ministre. Nous avons écouté attentivement il y a quelques instants et \nje tiens aussi à saluer ce que vient de dire mon collègue le ministre, Shakeel Mohamed. Il y a \nbeaucoup de vérité dans les quelques mots, il n’a pas été long, exceptionnellement, mais il y a \nbeaucoup de vérité dans ces quelques mots qu’il a utilisés. \nJe crois qu’il faut le dire la loi, cette nouvelle Section 76B du Criminal Code en 2021 \nvisait aussi à faire peur, ici, à Maurice et à d’autres aussi. Ce n’est pas notre style, ce n’est \npas notre façon de gouverner. Nous croyons dans le dialogue, dans la liberté d’expression et \n\n104 \n \nles gens ont le droit d’avoir des opinions mêmes si elles sont mauvaises mais qu’il faut \nrespecter. \nJe le répète ce morceau de loi de 2021 visait aussi – j’ai presque envie de dire surtout \nmais visait aussi – à faire peur. Et comme l’a dit mon collègue, le l’honorable ministre, \nShakeel Mohamed. C’était clair dès le début, nous n’avons pas voté contre, nous avons poke \nholes all over the place dans cette loi-là en 2021 parce que nous avons quel genre de \ncampagne ils auraient déclenché si nous avions dit – ce que vient de dire l’honorable \nministre, Shakeel Mohamed. \nC’était tellement évident, dès le départ que c’était inapplicable, que le but n’était pas \nd’appliquer cette loi-là. L’idée c’était de faire du bruit, de faire de la propagande et de faire \npeur. C’était, dès le départ, inapplicable. Et c’est pourquoi il n’y a jamais eu de poursuite, il \nn’y a jamais eu de case basée sur cette loi parce que c’était inapplicable. Le but n’était pas \nd’appliquer la loi, d’avoir une loi, c’était de faire du bruit, de faire peur. Mais, je crois que \nc’est là aussi l’explication de leur absence. C’est vrai qu’ils sont tout le temps absent, mais \ndans ce cas-là, franchement ! \nQuand nous approuvé le texte de loi dans la dernière séance, j’étais persuadé que quand \nmême ce qu’il leur reste de vie politique, allait se manifester, qu’ils allaient s’agiter. Zéro \npendant tout le weekend ! Zéro, et aujourd’hui, double zéro. Les deux ne sont pas là. C’est \néloquent que l’intention était politique, politicienne, politicaille, mais c’est honteux. C’est \nfranchement honteux pour un pays démocratique, respectable comme l’île Maurice.  \nSeulement, ce qui est aussi vrai, c’est cette campagne hystérique de la droite en Grande \nBretagne. Cela c’est du réel. Aucun pays aujourd’hui ne conteste la souveraineté de l’île \nMaurice sur les Chagos, mais j’ai rarement vu une campagne hystérique comme celle qui se \ndéroule depuis des semaines déjà et qu’au lieu de diminuer – non, mais quand on pense aux \ninsanités, aux imbécilités que la droite britannique déblatère tous les jours, et en passant, en \ncontradiction totale avec Trump, leur idole ! C’est leur idole. Moi j’avais craint à un moment \ndonné que Trump ne fasse objection à l’accord que nous avons finalement conclu avec la \nGrand Bretagne.  \nMais non, et eux aujourd’hui, mènent une campagne hystérique et se servent de ce bout \nde loi inapplicable dont l’intention n’avait jamais été d’être appliquée par le gouvernement \nMSM. Mais, aujourd’hui la droite en Grande Bretagne se sert à fond de ce morceau de loi. \nC’est pourquoi c’est bon qu’on repeal, qu’on retire ce morceau de loi de notre arsenal légal. \n\n105 \n \nCela ne va pas arrêter l’hystérie de ces messieurs, mesdames aussi de droite, de Grande \nBretagne. Là c’est quelque chose ça ! Il y a une course pour savoir des mesdames ou \nmessieurs réactionnaires qui sont les plus hystériques dans cette affaire. Ils vont continuer, \nmais au moins on leur retire un argument dont ils se servent. \nMais moi, Madam Speaker, ce qui m’attriste aussi c’est qu’il y a quelques \nchagossiens/chagossiennes qui jouent le jeu de l’hystérie. C’est triste quand je pense à un \njeune homme, un jeune chagossien qui été recruté dans la police mauricienne, qui a réussi ses \nexamens. Il été policier dans notre système. Il démissionne, il part pour aller dire qu’il est \npersécuté à Maurice, pour se servir de ce morceau de loi pour dire que voilà, on terrorise les \nchagossiens et les chagossiennes à l’île Maurice. Fausseté complète et il est bon que nous \nretirons ce morceau de loi de notre arsenal juridique, légal, parce que ça donne prétexte aux \nhystériques de Grande Bretagne, mais aussi aux quelques chagossiens/chagossiennes de \nmauvaise foi de mener le genre de campagne qu’ils sont en train de mener. \nDonc, en mai 2025, quand l’accord a été signé et nous revenons de loin, parce que \nfranchement moi quand nous avons négocié, quand nous avons finalisé cet accord avec la \nGrande Bretagne, ce n’était pas gagné d’avance dans le contexte international de ce moment-\nlà et qui dure, et qui est encore avec nous. Nous avons le droit d’être fiers. Nous avons eu à \nfaire certaines concessions, oui, parce que nous vivons dans un monde réel, un monde \ndifficile, très difficile. Mais aujourd’hui, c’est chose faite, ça se discute encore à Londres, \nmais les choses finiront par se passer comme elles doivent se passer. Mais, c’est difficile \naujourd’hui de ne pas comprendre le contexte dans lequel nous avons travaillé. Il faut \ncomprendre ce contexte dans lequel on a conclu cet accord avec la Grande Bretagne. \nDonc, depuis qu’il y a cet accord, il n’y a plus de raison d’être de ce morceau de loi. Il \ny a des raisons de retirer ce morceau de loi parce que ça donne des armes aux hystériques et \naux gens de mauvaise foi. Mais aujourd’hui, il n’y a plus de raison d’être, et c’est pourquoi il \nest bon pour une première occasion aujourd’hui qu’on retire cette nouvelle section 76B qui \nest restée lettre morte depuis qu’elle a été votée en 2021. C’est pourquoi il est bon qu’il y ait \nl’unanimité dans le Parlement. L’absence de l’Opposition est plus que regrettable, \ncondamnable comme toujours, mais nous, face à l’histoire encore une fois, nous faisons notre \ndevoir.  \nJe dois dire que j’aimerais conclure en revenant sur ce que le MMM a réussi en deux \noccasions. Avant mais surtout après les élections de 1976. C’est le MMM – je ne dis pas ça \n\n106 \n \navec une grosse tête, mais l’histoire nous regarde – qui après les élections de 1976, comme \nl’a dit le Premier ministre, a mis l’affaire Chagos, Diego Garcia, la question de souveraineté à \nl’ordre du jour : local et international. Bien d’autres se sont joints à ce combat, bravo et nous, \nau MMM, nous avons le droit d’être fiers de cela. Et moi je suis personnellement – à chaque \noccasion je le rappelle – fier d’avoir aussi mis Tromelin à l’ordre du jour. La petite île \nTromelin qu’il nous reste à retrouver. La petite île Tromelin était considérée comme une des \nîles éparses françaises, s’il vous plaît. J’ai fait mes recherches, j’ai été fouiller dans l’histoire \net franchement jusqu’au aujourd’hui je ne comprends pas comment j’ai réussi à aller à \nTananarive – j’étais simple député, secrétaire général du MMM – de m’entretenir avec le \nprésident malgache de l’époque Ratsiraka et d’obtenir de lui qu’à partir de cette date de 1978, \nMadagascar cesse de revendiquer Tromelin, continue de revendiquer les quatre autres îles \ndites éparses et ils appuient notre revendication, nous appuyons leurs revendications. \nJe ne me souviens pas vraiment comment j’ai réussi ça, mais c’est pourquoi ce n’est pas \nseulement parce que Madagascar est un pays peuplement de l’île Maurice, mais c’est un \nvoisin, c’est un pays frère ou sœur ou les deux. C’est pourquoi nous avons droit au MMM – \nd’autres aussi – mais nous avons droit au MMM d’être fiers de ce que nous avons fait \nconcernant les Chagos et Diego Garcia, la souveraineté de l’île Maurice sur les Chagos et \nj’espère que le temps viendra aussi vite que possible où nous retrouverons notre souveraineté \nsur la petite île, le petit morceau de sable Tromelin et qui a toute son importance dans le cadre \nde notre histoire. Encore une fois, je félicite le Premier ministre pour son discours et je \nremercie tous ceux qui sont présents aujourd’hui pour faire notre devoir vis-à-vis de notre \nhistoire. \nMerci, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Prime Minister! \n(5.34 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, first of all, I want to thank all those who \nparticipated in the debate, and are also present here – hon. Narsinghen, hon. Mohamed, the \nDeputy Prime Minister. Again, I also regret that the two Members of the Opposition have \nchosen not to be here, as usual, even though as hon. Shakeel Mohamed said, it is a non-\npartisan Bill. As the DPM and hon. Mohamed also said, they made it a partisan issue as if \nthey owned the monopoly to defend our claim for the sovereignty of Chagos. As the Deputy \n\n107 \n \nPrime Minister said, and he is right, the law was there à faire peur. It was not enforceable as \nyou rightly said – not enforceable.  \nThe proof of the pudding is in the eating. Who has been sued? Nobody! Just a law, \nblahblahblah, and again as the Deputy Prime Minister pointed out – it is good that he pointed \nout – lots of propaganda, falsities, fake news are being propagated in the House of Commons, \nthe Reform Party, especially from Nigel Farage. The latest thing they invented – that we are \ndiscussing with China for leasing Peros Banhos. Where did he get this information from? \nGod knows!  \nI think the hon. Attorney General rightly went on the MBC to forcefully deny this, and \nthis was taken up in the House of Commons by the Prime Minister, hon. Starmer. It is also \ntrue – I did not know this little bit – that the Deputy Prime Minister said that the young \nChagossian who went for interview was accepted as a Police Officer in our Police Force, who \nnow says he was persecuted in Mauritius. It is so blatant that you cannot even believe you are \nhearing this! \nThis law, as all the hon. Members have said, is now caduc. There is no raison d’être. \nSection 76B has no raison d’être because there is no country in the world, internationally, or \nthe UK or anyone else, claiming or has doubt about our sovereignty on the whole of the \nChagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia. \nWith these words, I commend the Bill to the House. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Just for the sake of clarity, may I draw everybody’s \nattention to Section 111 of the Constitution on the definition of Mauritius, which I am sure \nthe Deputy Prime Minister will remember, that all the islands, including Tromelin, Chagos, \neverything was in there, and it says – \n“(d) such places or areas as may be designated by regulations made by the Prime \nMinister, rights over which are or may become exercisable by Mauritius;” \nVery interesting piece! Do you agree, hon. Attorney General? \nMr Glover: I do! \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. That was the summing up. So, the debate is over. \nQuestion put and agreed to.  \nBill read a second time and committed. \n\n108 \n \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(Madam Speaker in the Chair) \nTHE CRIMINAL CODE (AMENDMENT NO. 2) BILL \n (No. XXVI of 2025) \nThe Criminal Code (Amendment No. 2) Bill (No. XXVI of 2025) was considered and \nagreed to. \nOn the Assembly resuming with Madam Speaker in the Chair, Madam Speaker reported \naccordingly. \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Criminal Code (Amendment No. 2) Bill (No. XXVI \nof 2025) was read a third time and passed. \nSecond Reading \nTHE COURT OF RODRIGUES JURISDICTION (AMENDMENT) BILL  \n(No. XXV of 2025) \n Order for Second Reading read.  \n(5.42 p.m.)  \nThe Attorney General (Mr G. P. C. Glover, SC): Madam Speaker, I move that the \nCourt of Rodrigues Jurisdiction (Amendment) Bill be read a second time. \nMadam Speaker, I am pleased to present to the House Court of Rodrigues Jurisdiction \n(Amendment) Bill. Its purpose is straightforward: it is to ensure that the jurisdiction and \nprotective powers provided under the Children’s Court Act 2020 can be exercised directly in \nRodrigues without requiring children and families to travel to Mauritius for matters that \nconcern their wellbeing. \nThis amendment reflects something very simple and practical. Rodrigues is part of our \nrepublic. The children of Rodrigues deserve the same access to protection and justice as \nchildren in Mauritius without added hurdles, delays or unnecessary travel. Today, when a \ncase involves a vulnerable or a child witness, proceedings too often require travel to \nMauritius. That is difficult for families and service providers, and in urgent matters, it can \ncompromise child protection itself. \n\n109 \n \nAs set out in Section 5 of the Children’s Court Act as it currently stands, the Protection \nDivision of the Children’s Court ensures that matters affecting the safety and wellbeing of \nchildren must be dealt with swiftly and with a full authority of the law.  \nIt has clear jurisdiction to hear applications for protective measures under Part IV of the \nAct with magistrates designated for this crucial role. Its orders are enforceable as civil \njudgments, and appeals may be brought before a Judge in Chambers with guardian ad litem \nappointed where necessary to safeguard the child’s best interest throughout the process. \nIn other words, Madam Speaker, as you personally know very well, the powers of the \nProtection Division of the Children’s Court are of extreme importance. They cover the full \nprotection pathway for children in need as per Part IV of the Act, which defines when a child \nrequires care and protection, whether it be abandonment, neglect, exploitation or exposure to \nharm. It empowers Police to intervene urgently and authorise officers to make assessments, \naccess premises and take immediate steps in the children’s best interests. And importantly, it \nmakes reporting of children in danger mandatory with confidentiality safeguards. \nPart IV of the Children’s Act provides for court ordered measures, emergency \nprotection orders followed by placement orders with social enquiry reports and renewals \nwithin set limits and ancillary orders such as supervision, counselling, medical care and \nrestrictions on contact. For longer horizons, the court may issue long term care orders and \nregulate contact through contact orders always guided by the child’s best interest and wishes. \nFinally, it addresses serious behavioural concerns through preventive intervention \norders and establishes a structured Child Mentoring Scheme, monitored by the authorities. By \nextending these powers to the magistrate for Rodrigues, this Bill ensures that such sensitive \ncases can be heard and resolved closer to where those families live. It strengthens the ability \nof social workers, Police Officers and medical professionals on the island to act promptly and \neffectively in the best interest of children. \nMadam Speaker, it is important to recall that this measure does not change the structure \nof our judiciary. The Court of Rodrigues remains part of the National Judicial System of the \nRepublic of Mauritius and remains handled by the same Judicial Administration, the same \nstandards and the same legal safeguards.  \nThis Bill does not devolve judicial authority; it merely brings existing national \nprotections within easier reach of residents of Rodrigues. Government will continue \nstrengthening operational capacity in Rodrigues where the Judiciary requires it, including \n\n110 \n \nbetter facilities, improved coordination with child protection agencies and the right support \nfor magistrates and court staff handling these sensitive matters. No child, Madam Speaker, \nshould be left with the impression that justice lies only across the sea. Justice must be \naccessible, timely and visible. \nMadam Speaker, this Bill brings more logic and convenience to the way we serve \nRodrigues families: it reduces delays, it strengthens child protection and it brings our \nRepublic’s justice system closer to those who need it where they need it. Access to justice, as \nI always say.  \nI, therefore, commend this Bill to the House. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nNow, we have Ms Henriette-Manan, please! \n(5.48 p.m.) \nMs D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues): Merci, Madame la \nprésidente. \nMerci de me donner l’opportunité de m’adresser à la Chambre sur ce projet de loi qui \nconcerne les enfants de Rodrigues. La discrimination, l’injustice, l’inégalité, ce sont des mots \nqui résonnent trop souvent encore dans les sphères législatives et judiciaires de Rodrigues. Et \npourtant, ces mots ne devraient pas faire partie du vocabulaire quotidien d’une république qui \nse veut juste, équitable et unie. \nJe ne cesserai jamais de le dire haut et fort : l’autonomie de Rodrigues ne doit en aucun \ncas servir de prétexte pour tolérer des inégalités de traitement entre les citoyens d’une même \nrépublique. Cette autonomie de Rodrigues, dont nous venons tout récemment de \ncommémorer le 23eme anniversaire, doit être respectée, doit être consolidée et pleinement \nvalorisée. C’est précisément dans cet esprit que s’inscrit le Court of Rodrigues Jurisdiction \n(Amendment) Bill que nous examinons aujourd’hui.  \nCet amendement vient corriger un déséquilibre, combler un retard et surtout affirmer un \nprincipe d’égalité entre les enfants de la république, qu’ils vivent à Maurice ou à Rodrigues. \nRappelons-le, la loi de 2020, sur les tribunaux pour enfants a instauré des juridictions \nspécialisées comprenant deux divisions distinctes : la division de la protection et la division \n\n111 \n \ncriminelle. Cette réforme, votée à Maurice en 2020, a marqué un tournant décisif pour la \njustice juvénile dans notre pays mais à Rodrigues, cette réforme a mis cinq longues années à \ntrouver son prolongement naturel – cinq ans, Madame la présidente. On croirait encore être à \nl’époque où les décrets voyageaient en bateau et arrivaient avec retard. \nMadam Speaker : Ou par pigeon voyageur, peut-être ? \nMs Henriette-Manan : Ou par pigeon voyageur, voilà ! Bravo aux magistrats, aux \nofficiers et aux personnels judiciaires de Rodrigues qui pendant ce temps ont continué à faire \nleur devoir, souvent dans un cadre légal inadapté et surtout avec les moyens du bord. Cet \namendement vient donc mettre de l’ordre, donner une base légale solide et inscrire Rodrigues \ndans une approche nationale cohérente de la protection de l’enfance.  \nEn apparence technique, cet amendement porte en réalité un message fort, celui de \nl’unité de la république de Maurice et du respect égal des droits de tous ces enfants, qu’ils \nvivent à Maurice, à Rodrigues ou demain, dans les autres îles de la république. Tous nos \nenfants doivent bénéficier des mêmes garanties de justice, de dignité et de protection. Je salue \ndonc cette mesure qui arrive certes tardivement, mais qui est accueillie favorablement par la \npopulation judiciaire de l’île. \nDe plus, elle intervient à un moment décisif dans un contexte de modernisation, la \nrénovation complète du Rodrigues Court House, réalisée au coût de R 7 millions, financée \npar l’assemblée régionale Rodrigues. Je tiens donc ici à féliciter le Chef commissaire et son \néquipe pour leur vision et leur engagement dans cette entreprise essentielle. Grâce à cette \nrénovation, le bâtiment, restait inchangé pendant plus de 25 ans, répond enfin aux besoins \nd’une justice moderne, humaine et inclusive. \nAujourd’hui, nous disposons d’une salle spécialement adaptée aux enfants, offrant un \nenvironnement plus serein et rassurant. D’une salle de vidéoconférence qui permet aux jeunes \nvictimes de témoigner sans devoir affronter directement leur agresseur, une avancée majeure \nen matière de respect, de dignité et de bien-être des enfants. C’est là une étape importante \ndans la construction d’une justice qui met l’humain au centre, qui comprend les fragilités et \nles besoins les plus vulnérables. Mais, Madame la présidente, nous ne devons pas nous arrêter \nen si bon chemin. Le progrès appelle la continuité. \nIl nous manque encore certaines infrastructures essentielles, à commencer par un \nchildren’s play area, un espace d’accueil et de réconfort pour les enfants avant ou après leur \n\n112 \n \ncomparution. L’espace existe déjà. Il ne manque que la volonté budgétaire pour le concrétiser. \nNous devons aussi veiller à doter la cour de psychologues qualifiés, capable d’accompagner \nles enfants tout au long du processus judiciaire et d’un Probation Officer, chargé du suivi des \nrapports sociaux et des recommandations dans l’intérêt supérieur de l’enfant. Ce sont là des \néléments essentiels pour rendre notre justice vraiment adaptée à la réalité des enfants. Cet \namendement vient combler des lacunes oui, mais il doit aussi ouvrir la voie à une réflexion \nplus globale sur la justice juvénile à Rodrigues.  \nTrop souvent encore des familles rodriguaise vivent des drames judiciaires silencieux \ncomme l’a mentionné l’Attorney General. Celui de voir leur enfant transféré à Maurice, loin \nde leurs proches, simplement parce que Rodrigues ne dispose pas des infrastructures \nnécessaires. Ces enfants déjà fragilisés se retrouvent isolés, coupés de leurs repères affectifs \net culturels et il faut le dire, sans détour, certains reviennent brisés, perdus, parfois \ntransformés en délinquants aguerris. La république ne devrait pas accepter cela car un enfant, \nqu’il soit né à Port Mathurin ou à Port-Louis, reste un enfant de la république et méritent la \nmême attention, la même protection et la même dignité. \nPermettez-moi, Madame la présidente, d’insister sur un point essentiel ? Cet \namendement aussi louable soit-il ne constitue qu’une première étape. Le Children’s Act 2020 \nlui-même doit être amendé afin d’inclure pleinement Rodrigues. En effet, la section 8 de cette \nloi, qui établit la composition du National Children’s Panel, mentionne plusieurs ministères et \ninstitutions nationales mais omet de prévoir la représentation de Rodrigues. C’est là une \nomission regrettable qu’il convient de corriger rapidement car comment pouvons-nous parler \nd’un système véritablement national de protection de l’enfance si Rodrigues n’a pas de voix \nau chapitre ? Une république unie ne peut tolérer des zones d’ombre dans la représentation de \nses territoires. \nJe tiens aussi à saluer le travail remarquable de la commissaire de la Famille à \nRodrigues qui œuvre pour régulariser le Child Mentoring Committee sur l’île en conformité \navec la section 44 du Children’s Act 2020. Cette initiative témoigne d’une volonté claire de \nrégulariser et d’implanter localement les structures prévues par la loi. Je l’encourage \nvivement à poursuivre dans cette voie car c’est à travers ce genre d’action concrète que les \ntextes prennent vie, que les promesses deviennent réalités. \nMadame la présidente, les lois à elles seules ne changent pas le destin des enfants. Elles \ndoivent s’accompagner de structures solides, de professionnels formés et d’un engagement \n\n113 \n \ncollectif. La justice ne doit pas seulement être rendue, elle doit aussi être comprise, vécue et \nressentie par ceux qu’elle protège. \nMadame la présidente, le regard que nous portons sur nos enfants est le reflet du pays \nque nous voulons demain. En protégeant nos enfants, en leur garantissant un traitement juste, \ndigne et équitable, nous consolidons les fondations mêmes de notre République.  \nCet amendement n’est donc pas un simple texte administratif, c’est un engagement \nmoral et républicain envers Rodrigues, envers la justice et surtout envers nos enfants – ces \ncitoyens de demain.  \nJe veux croire que ce texte marquera un tournant, qu’il ouvrira la voie à un air où la \njustice à Rodrigue ne sera plus perçue comme une copie tardive de celle de Maurice mais \ncomme une institution forte, respectée et pleinement intégrée à la république. Je veux croire \nque chaque enfant Rodriguais, quel que soit son parcours, pourra trouver auprès de la justice, \nune main tendue, un regard bienveillant et une chance de se reconstruire. Et pour marquer la \njournée internationale de la langue et culture Kreol, permettez-moi, Madame la présidente, de \ncité ce proverbe Africain en Kreol – \n« Sak zefor ki nou fer pou protez ek respekte drwa zenfan se enn pa ki nou fer pou enn \nlemond pli zoli. »  \nPar ces mots, Madame la présidente, je soutiens pleinement Le Court Of Rodrigues \nJurisdiction (Amendment) Bill. Je le fais au nom de la justice, de l’égalité et de la dignité de \ntous nos enfants de la République.   \nJe vous remercie.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Je vous pose juste une question, Vous avez bien dit que \nvous avez le video evidence dans votre tribunal ? \nMs Henriette-Manan: Video conferencing. \nMadam Speaker: J’aimerai savoir si on a la même chose à Maurice. Je ne suis pas très \nsûre. C’est nouveau alors. \nAllez, vas-y, hon. Member.  \n(5.58 p.m.) \nMr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues): Thank you, Madam Speaker. Let \nme congratulate my colleague from Rodrigues for her intervention.  \n\n114 \n \nMadam Speaker, the Court of Rodrigues Jurisdiction Act dates back to 1913. The \npresent Court of Rodrigues Jurisdiction (Amendment) Bill (No. XXV of 2025) marks an \nessential milestone in this long journey. As indicated in the Explanatory Note, this Bill \namends section 2 and 12 of the Court of Rodrigues Jurisdiction Act. The object of the Bill is \nto extend the application of Children’s Court Act 2020 to Rodrigues. \nConsequently, the magistrate for Rodrigues will now have jurisdiction to hear and \ndetermine cases which, in Mauritius, fall within the purview of the Protection Division and \nthe Criminal Division of the Children’s Court.  \nMadam Speaker, on 06 May this year, I addressed PQB/423 to the hon. Attorney \nGeneral, asking whether in relation to the Children’s Court, he could obtain from the Master \nand Registrar the number of sessions held in Rodrigues, the number of cases heard and \nwhether consideration will be given to establishing such a court in Rodrigues. In the absence \nof the hon. Attorney General, Mr Glover, the Ag. Attorney General, hon. Shakeel Mohamed, \nreplied and I quote – \n“In regard to the specialised nature and jurisdiction of the Children’s Court, \nconsideration may be given for the establishment thereof in Rodrigues. Accordingly, \nGovernment will act in consultation with the honourable Chief Justice for any decision \nto be taken thereof.” \nMadam Speaker, I commend the tangible outcome and timely efforts of the Attorney \nGeneral and his dedicated officers for their rapidity of action.  \nThis Bill symbolises a collective judicial and governments, Rodrigues and Mauritius, \ncommitment to the safety and well-being of all children in our Republic and more particularly \nin Rodrigues. The specialised Children’s Court will surely recognise the physical, emotional, \ndevelopmental needs of children and ensures that the judicial process itself does not further \ntraumatise them.  \nUntil now, the Court of Rodrigues, an adult-oriented court, includes a child- friendly \nmodel, a Family Juvenile Unit which serves as a mini–Children’s Court in principle, \ninaugurated in 2016 under the initiative of the former magistrate, Pareemala Devi Mauree. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to sincerely commend, her honour Magistrate Mauree, for her \nvisionary leadership and pioneering work in establishing this unique model in collaboration \nwith the probation office of the Regional Assembly.  \n\n115 \n \nThe creation of the unit was a response to the Human Rights Commission’s 2015 \nremarks, highlighting the absence of reformatory institutions, probation homes and detention \ncentres for minors as well as the rise in sexual offences involving minors and delays in \nbringing juvenile cases to justice. I note that the Chief Justice inaugurated the New Children \nCourt Unit during his last visit in Rodrigues in August this year. \nMadam Speaker, from societal values, perspectives it is worth noting that our children \nin Rodrigues generally do not display high levels of criminal behaviour. This is important for \nthe judiciary to safeguard them from the lifelong stigma associated with a criminal record. \nMadam Speaker, statistics from Rodrigues reveals that there are around 52 cases for the \nlast three years for emergency protection order for child with severe behavioural concerns \nand placement on long-term order.  Criminal cases for child victims of sexual abuse: 20 cases \nand juvenile offenders around 12 cases. \n Madam Speaker, for a Children Court to function effectively, it must be equipped with \nthe right tools particularly access to therapeutic and support services for families and children \nthere.  \nThe House will recall that during my intervention on the Children’s Court and Sex \nOffender Register Bill in 2020, I highlighted the need for facilities of the Rodrigues Family \nJuvenile Court Unit such as video conferencing, digital recording, a children’s play area, a \nsmall library, the witness room in the court to be linked with the court room and materials on \nchildren protection for professionals to be made available. I also stress on the importance of \nchild-friendly procedures including CCTV cameras to protect children who are victims and \nwitnesses or offenders.  \nAt present, Madam Speaker, in relation to sentencing a minor in Rodrigues, Rodrigues \nhas a Rehabilitation Youth Centre (RYC) Girls with no inmates actually, which is good and a \nshelter for boys, le Foyer Roseaux not registered yet, hon. Attorney General, no Correctional \nYouth Centre, no probation homes or hostel and the transit homes requiring major upgrading \nand other facilities, no trained and qualified rehabilitation officers. Instead, they are relying \non prison officers. There is a safe residential care institution for children at the Foyer Marie-\nMadeleine Delacroix at Baladirou accompanying around 30 children for their reintegration \ninto family and normal life. \nMadam Speaker, there remains an urgent need for a proper probation home in \nRodrigues for children with severe behavioural problems as many at risk children come from \n\n116 \n \nbroken and vulnerable families. I note that the law is silent as there is no provision for cases \nwhere juvenile with severe problems can’t be placed in institutions like probation home or \nhostel. My question is – what to do with them? There is a silence in the law around this point. \nActually, minors from Rodrigues, rightly said by hon. Ms Manan and the hon. Attorney \nGeneral as well, are being transferred to Mauritius CYC. I believe there is a constitutional \nright problem being deprived of visits by close relatives.  \nAnd in line with Rule 16 of Beijing rules and Children Act 2020, a dedicated clinical \npsychologist must assist the Children Court, the probation and aftercare service. At present, \nRodrigues has only one clinical psychologist despite increasing demand of the service.  \nMadam Speaker, the Ombudsperson for Children, Mrs Aneeta Goorah, has highlighted \na few major challenges for Rodrigues in relation to children in her annual report 2024-2025, \nrequiring our urgent attention. I note with concern, for childcare and maternal parenting in \nRodrigues, of the non-renewal, since 2022, of 20 garderies licences. There is only one \nregistered garderie, and you can imagine the bearing with regard to children care and \nmaternal parenting. I, therefore, urge the local authority, with due respect to our autonomy, in \nparticular the Commission for Child Development, to play an active rehabilitative role for \nchild victims of sexual offences, domestic violence and offenders alike. \nMadam Speaker, on a word of caution, the establishment of this Children’s Unit or \nChildren’s Court in Rodrigues must not be seen as an échappatoire or weakening parental \nauthority thereat. It must instead promote a shared responsibility among families, the \ncommunity and the State at large.  \nMany cases involving children in Rodrigues arise directly from poverty, the lack of \nfood, shelter, property housing and a safe family environment. As we say, enn fami, nou bann \nzanfan bizin ena enn bon lakaz, bizin ena enn bon lanvironnman pou zot grandi. This is \nprecisely where, Madam Speaker, given that in Rodrigues, since 2022, not a single concrete \nsocial housing has been constructed, I will continue to press on Rodrigues Regional Authority \nto urgently implement the long overdue housing scheme project for the benefit of vulnerable \nfamilies and our children. \nMadam Speaker, before concluding, allow me to make some proposals in relation to \nthis Bill for the benefit of all children in our Republic. During some researches on the \nchildren’s court in other jurisdictions, I observed that despite the constitutional rights \n\n117 \n \nprovided to individuals under Section 3 of our Constitution and the progressive provisions of \nthe Children’s Court Act 2020, there remains a need to include specific constitutional clauses \nthat clearly define and elaborate the rights of every child in our Republic. I firmly believe that \nsuch inclusion would ensure greater clarity and the application of rights and fundamental \nfreedom for our children. This would align our Constitution more closely to the core principle \nof the Convention on the Rights of the Child. \nMadam Speaker, for instance, the only explicit constitutional reference to our children \ncurrently appears only under Section 14, Protection of freedom to establish schools, sub \nclause (3) which merely provides that no person shall be prevented from sending a child to \nany school. That is the only one – Section 14.  \nDespite existing legislative provisions, I believe that constitutional guarantees for our \nchildren should be consolidated under one specific article in our Constitution. Let me just \ncome to my proposals. For instance, in addition to free compulsory education, basic nutrition, \nshelter and healthcare, every child should have a right –  \n\nto be protected from abuse, violence, exploitation, inhuman treatment, \npunishment;  \n\nto parental care and protection; \n\nnot to be detained except as a measure of last resort, and when detained, to be \nheld for the shortest appropriate, amongst others. \nI am, therefore, convinced that it is necessary to amend and entrench specific additional \nconstitutional protection for children, as is the case in several African and European countries \nsuch as Ghana, Kenya, Sweden, South Africa, Canada, India, Germany, and Italy. \nMadam Speaker, the judiciary, while establishing this more child friendly court, shall \nalso ensure sensitive training for magistrate and court staff in Rodrigues. I trust that the \nhonourable Chief Justice, in future judicial assignments, will take into consideration a \nmagistrate’s experience and understanding of Rodrigues social realities, child welfare and \nfamily needs.  \nFurthermore, in collaboration with the Rodrigues Regional Assembly, collaboration \nmust continue – \n\n118 \n \n\nto recruit additional Probation Officers, psychologists, as I mentioned, as the \nexisting Probation Unit remains understaffed; \n\nto recruit associated human resources and provide necessary training to \nimplement, for example, Madam Speaker, the Diversion Programme under \nSection 56 of Children’s Act. It is not being implemented. They do not have the \nnecessary staff. \nLet me also propose, Madam Speaker, that either the Ombudsperson for Children or \nany relevant institution undertake shortly a study in Rodrigues to examine how children \nexpress their voices and wishes during court proceedings with a view to improve the system. \nOn a final note, Madam Speaker, on today’s Order Paper of the Regional Assembly’s \nsitting, there was mention of a Motion standing in the name of the Commissioner for Child \nDevelopment, proposing the Rodrigues Regional Assembly (Child Mentoring) Regulations \n2025, thus repealing the 2014 regulation, which finally has been removed. I believe it is a \ngood move by the hon. Commissioner to have removed that motion. Indeed, it is a welcomed \ninitiative, pending the enactment of this Bill. \nMadam Speaker, with these words, I support the Court of Rodrigues Jurisdiction \n(Amendment) Bill (No. XXV of 2025). I thank you for your kind attention as always. \nMadam Speaker: Are you surprised that I am interested in these matters? \nMr François: I know why. \nMadam Speaker: Actually, I will refer you to Section 11 of the Constitution, about \none of the rights where children or minors are mentioned. Minors are not mentioned often in \nthe Constitution, but that was a very tall order. Maybe the Attorney General and the Minister \nwill be able to reply. Very interesting. \nNow, I think I have hon. Narsinghen. You are going to say a few words. Maybe you \ncan help us. \n(6.13 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International \nTrade (Mr H. Narsinghen): Yes, a few words, Madam Speaker. \n\n119 \n \nMadam Speaker: A few legal words as well. \nMr Narsinghen: I can fully understand the zeal of my two friends from Rodrigues, but \nalso, I cannot understand, again, at the cost of maybe saying the same thing, how our two \nfriends from the Opposition are not present. This amendment may seem not to be important \nfor them at least, but I consider it to be very important. \nMadam Speaker, when it comes to the Constitution, you have multiple approaches, and \nI have been explaining these approaches to my students. My approach has always been to \ntake the generous approach in the interpretation of the Constitution. When this law was \npassed in 2020, when it was not extended to our children in Rodrigues, this potentially could \nbe a breach of Section 3 and Section 16 of the Constitution, besides the section you \nmentioned. Why? Because when you analyse closely, when you scrutinise Section 3 and \nSection 16 of the Constitution, you will find out that one of the grounds for discrimination is \nalso place of origin. So, according to me, potentially, this was a clear, stark breach of the \nConstitution. This is the first point. \nSecondly, since I do not want to hammer on certain points, as I did previously on \nsection 76B of the Criminal Code, I want to explain to the population that we, as a \ndemocratic State, also have an obligation to comply with our international obligations. You \nwill understand that, in a way, we are implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of the \nChild. Not only the UN Convention, ladies and gentlemen, but we are also implementing the \nAfrican Charter. Very often, in human rights, we tend to forget the existence of the African \nCharter. So, the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child is very important. \nOne of the cardinal principles entrenched in the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of \nthe Child is the principle of the best interest of the child principle. This principle has been \nonboarded by the legislation that we have in Mauritius. \nLet me briefly refer to section 12 of the legislation, that is, the Children’s Court Act. \nYou will see a number of adaptions are being made in Section 12. I will just mention two for \nthe sake of time. For example, the Court shall ensure that appropriate arrangements are made \nto the courtroom to hear the child’s evidence. Here, we are referring to the child evidence. \nFor the child to be accompanied by his parents unless the Court designates another person to \ncompany the child. Also, you will see, there have been special adaptations made, for \nexample, to the use of video links, etc. \n\n120 \n \nSo, these special adaptations, Madam Speaker, have been made in the law and children \nin Mauritius, right from Soulliac to Cap Malheureux, have benefiting from that piece of \nlegislation. Unfortunately, children in Rodrigues have not been able to benefit from such \nadaptations. So, I think we have to commend the hon. Attorney General and his team, after at \nleast five years, to come up with this piece of legislation to redress the situation. They have to \nbe commended for that. \n You will see, Madam Speaker, in very practical terms, what does it implicate for the \nparents especially in Rodrigues. It would mean that there would be less travelling; it would \nimplicate that this will cost less for the families and also for social workers, because when \nthere is a case involving children, we do not only need magistrates, we also need social \nworkers, psychologists and people who know the realities of Rodrigues. So, when the case is \nbeing heard in Rodrigues itself and whereby, we have extended the jurisdiction of the Court \nof Rodrigues, I think, this is a significant progress that we have made.  \nAlso, there are very important principle – which I would call a sort of super-\nconstitutional principle – the principle of access to justice. We cannot give justice to parents \nin Mauritius, to the children in Mauritius and not to the children in Rodrigues.  \nSo, I think, we have made what would I qualify as a sort of quantum leap in terms of \ndemocratising the system, in terms of giving justice to the people of Rodrigues. So, I would \nstrongly commend the Bill. Thank you for your attention, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker:  Thank you. Yes! Hon. Minister. \n(6.19 p.m.) \n The Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare (Ms A. Navarre-Marie): \nMerci, Madame la présidente.  \nMadame la présidente, je suis fière aujourd’hui de prendre la parole sur ce projet \nd’amendement. The Court of Rodrigues Jurisdiction (Amendment) Bill (No.XXV of 2025) en \napparence anodin mais ô combien fondamentale car ce projet de loi représente une avancée \nmajeure dans le paysage du judiciaire à Rodrigues. \nEn effet, ce projet d’amendement présenté par mon collègue l’Attorney General bien \nque concis dans sa forme revêt une importance capitale pour les enfants et les familles de \nRodrigues. \n\n121 \n \nMadame la présidente, ce texte de loi comme indiqué par mon collègue l’Attorney \nGeneral, vise à amender la loi sur la juridiction du tribunal de Rodrigues afin d’y étendre \nl’application du Children’s Court Act de 2020. Je dois affirmer que ce projet était tant \nattendu. \nLors de mes rencontres avec la Commissaire des affaires féminines à Rodrigues de \nmême qu’avec la minority leader lorsqu’elles sont à Maurice ou même lors de ma mission à \nRodrigues le mois dernier, m’ont fait toutes les deux parts de leurs concerns sur la question. \nMadame la présidente, la Chambre se souviendra qu’en 2020 l’adoption du Children’s \nCourt Act avait permis d’établir un tribunal spécialisé pour les affaires impliquant des enfants \nen besoins de protection ou en conflit avec la loi. Le Children’s Court Act avait dans son \nsillage institué deux divisions essentielles dans son application notamment, la Protection \nDivision qui traite des questions de bien-être, de garde et de protection des enfants sous le \nChildren’s  Act de 2020 et la Criminal Division qui traite des infractions notamment, d’abus \nsexuels commis sur les enfants ou des délits dans lesquels des mineurs sont impliqués. \nCependant, Madame la présidente, jusqu’à présent la juridiction du tribunal pour \nenfants ne s’applique qu’à Maurice. En novembre 2020, lors de mon intervention sur un \nprojet de loi, the Children’s Court Bill, je disais que les objectifs étaient un bon départ. \nOui, c’était un bon départ, mais il était non seulement nécessaire d’aller plus loin. \nHormis de Children’s Court qui fait partie de Children’s Act de 2020, il est important de \nrevoir toute la législation concernant les enfants car elle comporte des lacunes. \nJe peux assurer la Chambre que mon ministère est actuellement en consultation avec le \nState Law Office pour revoir tout le Children’s Act pour une meilleure protection de tous les \nenfants de la république et bien sûre, tout sera fait en consultation avec nos sœurs et frères de \nRodrigues. \nMadame la présidente, je dois dire que cinq ans après, c’est ce gouvernement qui prend \nles mesures pour avancer. Jusqu’à ici, les affaires concernant les enfants à Rodrigues devait \nsoit être transférées à Maurice avec toutes les complications logistiques et émotionnelles que \ncela implique soit être traitées dans le cadre de juridictions ordinaires sans bénéficier des \nprocédures spécifiques et protectrices prévues par le Children’s Court Act. \nDurant ma récente visite à Rodrigues, j’ai posé la question sur le fonctionnement de la \nCour pour les enfants et je compris que c’était le système D – de l’improvisation. Ce présent \namendement garanti désormais que les enfants de Rodrigues auront le même accès à une \n\n122 \n \njustice spécialisée et bienveillante que les enfants vivant à Maurice et vient ainsi corriger une \ninégalité. \nMadame la présidente, je voudrais saluer le travail de l’Attorney General qui depuis sa \nprise de fonction s’est donné pour mission de corriger au fur et à mesure les anomalies qui \nexistent dans un certain nombre de textes de loi. Les amendements apportés à ce présent texte \nde loi vont dans ce sens. En effet, ce texte comporte deux dispositions majeures – dans la \npremière disposition la clause 3 modifie l’article 2 de la loi principale afin d’y insérer une \nréférence au Children’s Court Act de 2020. Cet amendement permet d’intégrer officiellement \nle cadre juridique du tribunal pour enfants dans le système judiciaire de Rodrigues. Dans la \nseconde disposition, la clause 4, remplace le paragraphe 1 de l’article 12, toujours de la loi \nprincipale, pour que le magistrat à Rodrigues puisse juger les affaires qui à Maurice \nrelèveraient de la Protection Division ou de la Criminal Division du tribunal pour enfants. \nEn d’autres termes, Madame la présidente, le magistrat de Rodrigues exercera \ndésormais les mêmes pouvoirs et compétences qu’un magistrat du tribunal pour enfants à \nMaurice. En étendant la juridiction du tribunal pour enfants à Rodrigues, nous faisons un pas \ndécisif vers une justice équitable et accessible pour tous les enfants de la République. Les \nenfants de Rodrigues, victimes de maltraitance, de négligence, d’abus sexuel ou \nd’exploitation, verront les affaires les concernant traitées sur place dans des délais \nraisonnables et dans un environnement adapté à leur âge et à leur sensibilité. De la même \nmanière, les jeunes en conflit avec la loi, bénéficieront d’un accompagnement éducatif et de \nréhabilitation plutôt que d’un traitement strictement punitif.  \nC’est là toute la philosophie de ces amendements, c’est-à-dire, apporter une justice qui \nprotège, qui éduque et qui répare au lieu de punir. Dans le même temps, il faut savoir que ce \ntexte de loi s’accompagne d’un renforcement du dispositif local à Rodrigues. Il donnera au \nmagistrat, aux travailleurs sociaux et aux services de la protection des enfants à Rodrigues les \nmoyens juridiques nécessaires pour intervenir efficacement dans les affaires concernant les \nenfants. \nMadame la présidente, ces amendements s’inscrivent aussi dans la continuité des \nengagements pris par la République de Maurice en vertu de la convention des Nations Unies \nrelative aux droits des enfants. Le choix que nous faisons aujourd’hui dans cette Chambre, \ntraduit dans les faits le principe fondamental selon lequel l’intérêt supérieur de l’enfant doit \ntoujours primer. Aussi, notre vote de ce soir réaffirme la volonté de ce gouvernement de \n\n123 \n \ngarantir une égalité de traitement et de protection pour chaque enfant de la République de \nMaurice. Le Court of Rodrigues Jurisdiction (Amendment) Bill 2025 est bien plus qu’un \nsimple exercice. C’est avant tout une réforme de justice sociale, un acte d’équité et un \nmessage fort envoyé à nos concitoyens de Rodrigues et je veux leur dire que les enfants de \nRodrigues ont les mêmes droits, la même protection et la même attention que tous les autres \nenfants de la république. \nJe voudrais profiter de cette occasion pour rendre hommage à tous ceux et celles qui \nœuvrent chaque jour pour la protection et le bien-être des enfants à Maurice, à Rodrigues et à \nAgaléga. Je remercie encore une fois mon collègue, l’Attorney General pour ces \namendements qui apporteront un changement fondamental dans la vie des enfants de \nRodrigues. \nJe vous remercie. \nMadam Speaker: Merci. Hon. Deputy Prime Minister! \n(6.29 p.m.) \n \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Merci, Madam Speaker. Comme tous les orateurs et \noratrices, comme tous les membres de l’Assemblée l’ont dit avant moi, c’est un texte de loi \ntrès important qui est devant la Chambre et c’est bon, c’est excellent, c’est éloquent que ce \ntexte de loi fasse l’unanimité. Je ne peux pas dire des deux côtés de la Chambre, nous avons \nnos amis de Rodrigues de ce côté-ci, des amis de Rodrigues de l’autre côté et là aussi il y a \nunanimité. C’est donc un moment important et nous sommes obligés de noter qu’encore une \nfois à un moment important, ce qu’il reste de l’Opposition est inexistante, est absente. \nC’est un moment bien important. Nos sœurs et frères de Rodrigues sont mieux placés \npour le dire, mais je le dis sincèrement, c’est un moment très important pour Rodrigues et ses \nenfants. Je tiens à le répéter, moi-même, tout comme le Premier ministre, nous ne raterons \njamais une occasion de faire des choses en faveur de Rodrigues. Consolider l’autonomie, \nconsolider la démocratie, éliminer les inégalités entre Maurice et Rodrigues, nous ne raterons \njamais une occasion de progresser dans ce sens et ce soir, c’est ce que nous sommes en train \nde faire. Ce soir nous faisons en sorte que la loi pour les enfants à Maurice s’applique à \nRodrigues. Ce n’est pas la fin de l’histoire, pas du tout. C’est une étape importante vers un \nidéal. \n\n124 \n \nBravo à l’Attorney General, bravo à la ministre responsable des droits de l’enfance et \ndes femmes. C’est un pas important, mais pas seulement pour Rodrigues parce que nous une \nvraie république. Nous autres sur l’île principale, nous devons chacun/chacune parmi nous \navoir à cœur les intérêts réels de Rodrigues et c’est pourquoi je le répète ; nous ne raterons \njamais une occasion d’aider Rodrigues, de consolider l’autonomie, de consolider la \ndémocratie, de consolider l’égalité entre nos sœurs et frères et les enfants de Rodrigues et \nceux de l’île Maurice.  \nCeci dit, j’aimerai revenir sur quelque chose qu’a mentionné mon collègue le ministre \nde l’Environnement et c’est un jour important pour Rodrigues pas seulement parce que nous \nétendons ce soir à Rodrigues les droits de l’enfant, mais aussi avec derrière la porte le COP \n30. Le COP 30 le mois prochain au Brésil est un moment crucial pour le monde entier, mais \nsurtout pour les petites îles, pour les îles comme Maurice, comme Rodrigues, comme Agaléga \net je trouve ça profondément éloquent que nous avons pris la décision que la délégation de \nl’île Maurice à COP 30 le mois prochain au Brésil sera dirigée par le ministre des Affaires \nétrangères de l’île Maurice à la demande du Conseil des Ministres, du Cabinet du \ngouvernement, mais inclura le Chef commissaire de Rodrigues qui est aussi responsable de \nl’environnement à Rodrigues dans le gouvernement régional de Rodrigues.  \nIl ne faut pas que ça passe inaperçu. C’est un geste, c’est un acknowledgement, c’est \nquelque chose de profond et qui ne va pas en rester là. Partout, je le répète, où nous pouvons \npermettre à nos sœurs et frères Rodriguais de jouer pleinement leur rôle, pas seulement dans \nl’intérêt de Rodrigues, mais là nous allons jouer ensemble notre rôle au Brésil à un moment \noù les choses se présentent mal. Il faut le dire. Le COP 30 au Brésil se présente mal. Hier, le \nsecrétaire général des Nations Unies a donné une interview internationale sur COP 30. Les \nchoses se présentent mal, mais nous n’avons pas – c’est ce qu’il disait, c’est ce qu’il dit – le \ndroit de baisser les bras. Même si les choses ne se passent pas bien au Brésil à COP 30, il ne \nfaut pas baisser les bras. Il faudra ensuite reprendre les efforts de façon à ce que dans les \nannées à venir, nous obtenions que cette barre de 1.5% ne soit pas franchie. Cette limite de \n1.5% d’augmentation de la température est en train d’être malheureusement dépassée, mais \nnous avons les moyens de rattraper cela et de revenir dans les années à venir. Ben, nous \ncomptons sur le Chef commissaire de Rodrigues pour nous aider avec notre ministre des \nAffaires étrangères pour obtenir cela. \nDonc, ça m’émotionne un peu qu’au moment où on est en train de faire progresser les \ndroits de l’enfant et donc de la famille à Rodrigues avec un amendement important et je salue \n\n125 \n \nmoi aussi le travail fait une fois de plus par l’Attorney General. C’est formidable que nous \nsommes en train de faire cela à un moment où symboliquement, mais dans la pratique aussi \nnos sœurs et frères de Rodrigues à travers leur Chef commissaire seront au Brésil le mois \nprochain pour ensemble Rodrigues, l’île principale et demain Agaléga. Je n’ai pas mentionné \nSaint Brandon parce qu’il n’y a pas d’enfants à Saint Brandon – il n’y a que des pêcheurs, des \ntravailleurs, le management, mais il n’y a pas d’enfant ou du moins jusqu’à présent il n’y pas \nd’enfants que je sache à Saint Brandon. \nDonc, bravo à l’unanimité qui s’est faite dans la Chambre ce soir. Bravo à nos amis de \nRodrigues, bravo à l’Attorney General et vive la République de Maurice. Vive Rodrigues. \nMerci, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister! \n(6.36 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the Bill before the House, like hon. Ms \nNavarre-Marie rightly pointed out, is not any ordinary Bill. It is about equality before the law \nin one Republic. It also shows our determination to make sure that everyone in the Republic \nis treated on an equal footing.  \nThis Bill concerns one of the most sensitive responsibilities of the State – the protection \nand welfare of children. It seeks to ensure that when a child in Rodrigues requires the urgent \nprotection of our courts for his or her safety and well-being, intervention can take place \ndirectly on the island itself without the need to travel to Mauritius.  \nAt present, cases involving vulnerable children, including matters of abuse, of neglect, \nexploitation or abandonment, we need to refer the case to the Children’s Court here, in \nMauritius. While our justice system is supposed to apply equally across the Republic, the \nphysical distance, the need for air travel, the scheduling constraints associated with these \ncourt proceedings inevitably increase and create real practical barriers. These can delay \ndecisions, increase the distress for families – imagine a child who is being abused has to wait \n– and ultimately, risk compromising the purpose of the law which is, first of all, to protect. \nMadam Speaker, this Bill enables, therefore, the Magistrate in Rodrigues to exercise on \nthe island the full range of protective powers provided under the Children’s Court Act of \n2020. These include emergency protection orders, supervision, placement measures, \n\n126 \n \nmonitoring arrangements and decisions connected to criminal proceedings which involve \nchildren. In short, it ensures that cases which demand urgency and humanity can be handled \nand without delay. \nMadam Speaker, the intention is simple: to ensure that every child in Rodrigues has \naccess to the same level of protection, delivered with the same readiness and authority as any \nchild in Mauritius. The rights we legislate for must be meaningful wherever a Mauritian child \nlives. In that sense, this is not a political reform nor is it a statement about autonomy. It is a \npractical improvement that reflects good administration and equal treatment. Rodrigues \ncontinues to enjoy its recognised autonomy through the Rodrigues Assembly in areas of local \ngovernance, and Government will continue to support that framework, but core judicial \nmatters must remain firmly part of the national system and everyone can be protected in the \nsame way. \nMadam Speaker, as part of its priorities, Government has committed to making justice \nmore accessible and more efficient across the country. The Bill forms part of that effort. \nGovernment will continue to do all it can to ease the burden of the Rodrigues’ population, \nincluding problems involving flight tickets, their availability, prices and conditions. It is a \nreminder, Madam Speaker, that we are all part of the Republic of Mauritius. We are one \nnation.  \nThis approach is consistent with the broader direction of Government regarding \nRodrigues: targeted realistic improvements that address the island’s everyday needs. As the \nhon. Deputy Prime Minister said, this is one step towards that. Whether it is in transport \nconnectivity, availability of essential services or judicial access, we are determined to deliver \nsolutions that respond to the reality of Rodrigues because Rodrigues is part of our Republic \nand, therefore, must have access to the same level of public service. \nI wish to end by congratulating the Attorney General for bringing this Bill to the House. \nHe is doing a lot of work, as you can see. This is why I congratulate him. And this is why, \nMadam Speaker, I unhesitatingly commend this Bill to the House. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Your winding-up speech, please! \n(6.41 p.m.) \n\n127 \n \nMr Glover: Madam Speaker, there can be no doubt that we have, in the amendment \nproposed this evening, a straightforward, practical amendment which increases access to \njustice. However, Madam Speaker, I do not wish to take all the plaudits for this amendment.  \nIt must be underscored that this amendment is the fruit of consultations with the \njudiciary following an expressed request of the Chief Justice, showing if there was any need \nthat collaboration between the Judiciary, the Legislature and the Executive is the best \nguarantor of what I have termed “the juxtaposition of powers”, which cements our democracy \nand the rule of law. \nLet me reassure the people of Rodrigues. We are fully conscious of the shortcomings \nwhich pervade the Children’s Act. Believe it or not, we are, as we speak, looking into the \nseveral amendments that are necessary, and we will listen and interact with the \nrepresentatives of Rodrigues in the House before coming up with any future amendment \nwhich concerns Rodrigues. \nI have also taken good note of the remarks of hon. François regarding the inadequacies \nof the system, and we shall address them as we cannot fail the children of the Republic. \nMadam Speaker, let me say this to conclude. I am in full agreement that we cannot and \nwe must do everything that we can for all the children of the Republic so that they have the \nsame opportunities and have the same access to justice.  \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. You once again commend the Bill, Attorney General? \nMr Glover: I commend the Bill to the House, Madam Speaker. \nQuestion put and agreed to.  \nBill read a second time and committed. \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(Madam Speaker in the Chair) \nThe Court of Rodrigues Jurisdiction (Amendment) Bill (No. XXV of 2025) was \nconsidered and agreed to. \n\n128 \n \nOn the Assembly resuming with Madam Speaker in the Chair, Madam Speaker reported \naccordingly. \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Court of Rodrigues Jurisdiction (Amendment) Bill \n(No. XXV of 2025) was read the third time and passed. \nADJOURNMENT \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister! \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Tuesday 11 November 2025 at 11.30 a.m. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to.  \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned! \nAt 6.47 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 11 November 2025 \nat 11.30 a.m. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n129 \n \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nFORMER PRIME MINISTER’S ADVISERS – NAMES & REMUNERATION & \nBOARD MEMBERSHIPS (2015- 2024)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/954",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 954,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/954) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port-Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to inspection of \nautoclaves and boilers at various public Hospitals sites, he will state – \n(a) \nthe names and qualifications of the registered boiler inspectors authorised to \nconduct same, and  \n(b)  whether he has been made aware of any case of misrepresentation in relation \nthereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFOND DU SAC – PORTION NO. 40 – COMPULSORY LAND ACQUISITION – DUE \nCOMPENSATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/955",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 955,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/955) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the compulsory land \nacquisition of portion number 40 for the construction of drains for flood mitigation measures \nat Fond du Sac in 2018, he will state the reasons for the non-settlement of the price payable to \nthe land owners thereof as at to date, indicating the expected date of settlement thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed that the amount due to the former landowner of Portion Number \n40 at Fond du Sac was credited to the account of the Public Notary, appointed to draw the \ndeed of acquittance, in November 2024. \n\n139 \n \nIn September 2025, my Ministry received representations from the former landowner \nthat he had not yet received the compensation. My Ministry has, on several occasions, \nrequested the Notary to effect payment of the compensation due to the landowner. \nI am informed that the Notary has called the former landowner to his office on 05 \nNovember 2025 for signature of the deed and payment of the compensation due. \n \nSYNTHETIC DRUG ADDICTION – HOSPITAL CARE – DEATH RATE & \nRESEARCH STUDY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/956",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 956,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/956) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the high prevalence of \nsynthetic drug addiction across the island, he will state the number of synthetic drug-\ndependent patients who have sought hospital care from 2019 to 2024, indicating – \n (a) the number of individuals, including adolescents, who have passed away as a \nresult thereof, and  \n(b) \nwhether his Ministry will consider commissioning a research study on addiction \nrates to synthetic drugs among different age groups with a gender-based \napproach.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nPOINTE DU DIABLE – ADDITIONAL PARKING FACILITIES – TRAFFIC \nMANAGEMENT MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/957",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 957,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/957) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to Pointe du Diable near Bambous-\nVirieux, he will state – \n(a) \nwhether consideration will be given for the provision for additional parking \nfacilities for visitors in view of the poor visibility along the main road thereat, \nand \n(b) \nthe measures being envisaged to ensure safe access and proper traffic \nmanagement thereat, particularly during weekends.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \n\n140 \n \nMORC. RAMLAGUN, VALLÉE DES PRÊTRES – FLOOD MITIGATION \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/958",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 958,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/958) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to flood mitigation \nmeasures within the region of Vallée des Prêtres, particularly in Morcellement Ramlagun, \nincluding the placing of rock bunds at critical locations as per the report issued on 16 \nSeptember 2025, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Land Drainage \nAuthority, information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nMELVILLE, GRAND GAUBE – BUS ROUTE 178 – IRREGULAR TRANSPORT \nFACILITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/959",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 959,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/959) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to bus route 178 in Melville, Grand \nGaube, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport \nAuthority, information as to whether urgent remedial measures will be taken to ensure regular \npublic transport services along same.",
      "answer": "Reply: Route 178 runs between Melville to Mme Azor and 6 buses are licensed to \noperate along this route.  \nThe problems encountered by commuters along this route were previously raised in PQ \nB/560 in June 2025. As I highlighted in the reply to that Parliamentary Question, the road \ninfrastructure along the route was quite narrow and it only allows smaller buses up to 42 \nseaters to be operated along the route. This is a major impediment preventing the \nredeployment of buses, from other routes (where most of the buses are 60-seaters) to route \n178. \nThe Ministry had a meeting with Village Councillors and some residents of Melville on \n20 June 2025. The TBS Ltd and other operators in the north were requested to explore the \npossibility to have additional buses to supplement the service along that route. None of the \noperators has buses of the required size.  \nAccording to information received from the NLTA, out of the six buses licensed for the \nroute, five are providing a regular service. One bus has been off the road since December \n2024. Its replacement is expected by November 2025.  \nThe NTC has deployed a shuttle service between Mme Azor and Goodlands to relieve \nthe transport situation to some extent.  \n\n141 \n \nFollowing the extension of the bus service along route 178 from Belmont to Poudre \nd’Or on 13 July 2024 (over a distance of 6 kms), the running time of buses has increased \nalong the route causing the frequency of operation to be longer and impacting adversely on \nthe problem of residents of Melville. \nThe NLTA is envisaging the licensing of two additional buses along route 178. \n \nPOLICE STATION COMPOUNDS – ABANDONED/UNUSED/SEIZED \nVEHICLES – ENVISAGED MEASURES \n(No. A/3) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to \nabandoned/seized/unused vehicles lying in the compounds of Line Barracks, SMF Complex \nin Vacoas, Divisional Headquarters and Police Stations, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to whether he has been aware of the \nnumber thereof and the inconveniences being caused as a result thereof and, if so, indicate the \nmeasures being envisaged to address this situation – \nReply: A total of 484 vehicles, including motorcycles, are presently lying in the \ncompounds of Line Barracks, the SMF Complex in Vacoas, Divisional Headquarters, and \nvarious Police Stations across the island. The details are as hereunder – \nCompounds \nAbandoned  Seized \nUnused \n Total \nLine Barracks \nNil \n83 \n72 \n155 \nSMF Complex, Vacoas \nNil \nNil \n2 \n2 \nDivisional Headquarters  \n2 \n7 \nNil \n9 \nPolice Stations around the Island \n180 \n118 \n20 \n318 \nTotal \n182 \n208 \n94 \n484 \n \n\n142 \n \nThese vehicles have either been involved in road accidents, secured as exhibits in \ncriminal or drug-related cases, abandoned in public places, or are police vehicles beyond \neconomical repair.  \nWhile these 484 vehicles cause certain inconveniences within the respective \ncompounds, necessary actions are being taken to remove them to a secured location at Fort \nGeorge. During previous exercises, a total of 560 vehicles have already been transferred to \nFort George. These vehicles are securely kept thereat, pending disposal or return to their \nrespective owners, where applicable. \nThe overall process of removing and disposing of these vehicles is inherently time-\nconsuming due to the distinct procedures applicable to each category. Abandoned vehicles \nrequire identification, inspection, and multiple notifications to owners before any action can \nbe taken.  \nSeized vehicles are retained as exhibits pending the completion of investigations or \ncourt proceedings, which can extend over long periods. In the case of unused vehicles, \ndisposal can only proceed following assessments by mechanical engineers, completion of \nboard of survey reports, and subsequent auction procedures. These administrative and legal \nrequirements contribute to the gradual pace at which the situation is being addressed. \nDARUTY & VALE JUNCTION – TRAFFIC CONGESTION – SURVEY & \nMEASURES \n(No. A/4) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre D'or) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to junction Daruty and Vale, he will \nstate if a survey has been carried out to assess the traffic congestion occurring thereat \nbetween 7 a.m. and 9 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 7 p.m. and, if so, indicate the – \n(a) \nfindings thereof, and \n(b) \nremedial actions being envisaged in relation thereto. \nReply: The junction of Mapou-Goodlands Road (A5 Road) and Vale Road (B12 Road) \nis a signalised T-junction. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that a survey conducted by the \nTraffic Management and Road Safety Unit (TMRSU) has revealed that during peak hours, \nthere is a high volume of traffic coming from A5 Road and Goodlands Bypass (A13 Road) \nwishing to right turn to accede onto B12 Road. As such, the vehicles have to wait for a safe \ngap to perform this right turning movement or for vehicles coming from Motorway M2 to \nprovide the right of way, as a courtesy, for vehicles on A5 to right turn onto B12 Road. In \n\n143 \n \ndoing so, traffic queues quickly build up. This high volume of right turning traffic movement \nduring peak hours is the primary cause of queueing at this signalised T-junction. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed by the TMRSU that as an immediate \nmeasure, it has provided an early cut-off for the traffic signal for the leg coming from \nMotorway M2, that is, stopping the vehicles along this leg and simultaneously increasing the \ngreen time for the traffic signal phasing along A5 Road, to cater for the high volume of right \nturning traffic movement.  \nThis measure is intended to give the high volume of right-turning vehicles on A5 Road \nmore time to clear the intersection and thus provide immediate relief for the queue build-up. \nI am further informed that, as a short-term solution, the TMRSU has worked out the \nfollowing options, for implementation by the Road Development Authority (RDA) – \n(i) \nProviding a dedicated right turning lane along A5 Road for traffic right-turning \nonto B12 Road as well as the provision of left turning slip lanes, to reduce \nqueueing by segregating turning traffic and through traffic. \n(ii) \nConstruction of a new link road from the existing roundabout at junction of A5 \nRoad and A13 (Goodlands Bypass) Road up to the B12 Road, passing next to \nDaruty Cemetery. This measure is expected to reduce traffic volume at the \nsignalised junction of A5/B12 by diverting traffic from Daruty to Petit \nRaffray/Goodlands and vice-versa. \nI am informed by the RDA that as per the design submitted by the TMRSU for the \nprovision of a slip lane from Mapou-Goodlands Road, A5 towards Vale Road, B12, land is to \nbe acquired from Societe Rouillard. The land acquisition process has already been initiated \nand is currently ongoing. \nThe RDA intends to implement the project as soon as land acquisition procedures \nwould be completed and financial clearance obtained from the Ministry of Finance. \nFORBACH ROAD, FOND DU SAC – BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS \n(No. A/5) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie &Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to a building constructed by the District \nCouncil of Pamplemousses at Forbach Road, Fond du Sac, he will state the – \n(a)  total cost of construction thereof, indicating the initial estimated cost and final \ncost thereof;  \n(b)  date of completion thereof, and  \n\n144 \n \n(c) \nreasons why the building is not yet operational. \nReply: The District Council of Pamplemousses had initiated the construction of a \nbuilding to be used as a hall in 2018/19. The building was of an extent of 213 m² consisting \nof the ground floor only.  \nThe project was implemented into two phases, namely – \n(i) \nPhase I - Construction of grey building only, and \n(ii) \nPhase II - Completion of the finishing works.  \nThe project value was set at Rs2.6 million for the setting up of the grey building only. \nHowever, the actual cost amounted to Rs2,719,500 due to the addition of two concrete steps, \nwhich was not initially included in the scope of works. This addition represented a variation \nof 4.5% of the original estimate. The works started on 01 August 2019 and was completed on \n20 April 2020. \nThe implementation of the finishing works was to be carried out partly through \ncontracting-out of the works relating to, but not limited, to tiling, plumbing, drainage, \nsewerage, while the painting works would be done by the in-house labour. \nThe cost estimates thereto amounted to Rs700,000. However, these works were \ncompleted within a total cost of Rs696,350. The works started on 11 March 2020 and were \ncompleted on 25 June 2020.  \nAs regards the works to be completed by the in-house labour of the Council, these, as \nmentioned above, are related to painting of the building. However, due to the restrictions \nwhich were prevailing in the country up to 2022 because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the \npainting works could not be completed.  \nDuring the Financial Year 2023/24, minor works were carried on site with a view of \ninaugurating the building. However, the District Council of Pamplemousses could not \nproceed with the works in 2024/25 due to financial constraints and the deployment of in-\nhouse labour to other priority works on other sites. \nThe Council is presently undertaking painting works at the building at Forbach by in-\nhouse labour. Once the works are completed, the District Council of Pamplemousses will \ncarry out some upgrading and maintenance works on the adjoining infrastructures, namely \nthe renovation of the mini-soccer pitch, the children’s playground, the pétanque courts and \nthe volleyball pitch.  \nThe inauguration of the building is planned in February 2026, once all these renovation \nworks are completed.  \n  \n\n145 \n \nMAURITIUS TOURISM AUTHORITY – PLEASURE CRAFT LICENCES – \nLICENCE HOLDERS & DATE OF ISSUE \n(No. A/6) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Tourism whether, in regard to commercial pleasure craft licences, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Tourism Authority, information as to the \nnumber thereof issued during the period 2015 to 2024 for the coastal belt of Mont-Choisy to \nPoudre d’Or, indicating, in each case the name of the licence holder and date of issue thereof.  \nReply: For period 2015-2024, the Mauritius Tourism Authority has issued a total of \n186 commercial pleasure craft licences for the coastal belt of Mont-Choisy to Poudre d’Or as \nfollows – \n \nYear \nNo. of Licences issued \n2015 \n18 \n2016 \n17 \n2017 \n23 \n2018 \n13 \n2019 \n11 \n2020 \n14 \n2021 \n14 \n2022 \n13 \n2023 \n29 \n2024 \n34 \nTotal \n186 \n \nThe list of licence holders with corresponding date of issue of each licence is being \nplaced in the Library of the National Assembly.",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "A/3",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 3,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. A/3) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to \nabandoned/seized/unused vehicles lying in the compounds of Line Barracks, SMF Complex \nin Vacoas, Divisional Headquarters and Police Stations, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to whether he has been aware of the \nnumber thereof and the inconveniences being caused as a result thereof and, if so, indicate the \nmeasures being envisaged to address this situation –",
      "answer": "Reply: A total of 484 vehicles, including motorcycles, are presently lying in the \ncompounds of Line Barracks, the SMF Complex in Vacoas, Divisional Headquarters, and \nvarious Police Stations across the island. The details are as hereunder – \nCompounds \nAbandoned  Seized \nUnused \n Total \nLine Barracks \nNil \n83 \n72 \n155 \nSMF Complex, Vacoas \nNil \nNil \n2 \n2 \nDivisional Headquarters  \n2 \n7 \nNil \n9 \nPolice Stations around the Island \n180 \n118 \n20 \n318 \nTotal \n182 \n208 \n94 \n484 \n \n\n142 \n \nThese vehicles have either been involved in road accidents, secured as exhibits in \ncriminal or drug-related cases, abandoned in public places, or are police vehicles beyond \neconomical repair.  \nWhile these 484 vehicles cause certain inconveniences within the respective \ncompounds, necessary actions are being taken to remove them to a secured location at Fort \nGeorge. During previous exercises, a total of 560 vehicles have already been transferred to \nFort George. These vehicles are securely kept thereat, pending disposal or return to their \nrespective owners, where applicable. \nThe overall process of removing and disposing of these vehicles is inherently time-\nconsuming due to the distinct procedures applicable to each category. Abandoned vehicles \nrequire identification, inspection, and multiple notifications to owners before any action can \nbe taken.  \nSeized vehicles are retained as exhibits pending the completion of investigations or \ncourt proceedings, which can extend over long periods. In the case of unused vehicles, \ndisposal can only proceed following assessments by mechanical engineers, completion of \nboard of survey reports, and subsequent auction procedures. These administrative and legal \nrequirements contribute to the gradual pace at which the situation is being addressed. \nDARUTY & VALE JUNCTION – TRAFFIC CONGESTION – SURVEY & \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "A/4",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 4,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. A/4) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre D'or) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to junction Daruty and Vale, he will \nstate if a survey has been carried out to assess the traffic congestion occurring thereat \nbetween 7 a.m. and 9 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 7 p.m. and, if so, indicate the – \n(a) \nfindings thereof, and \n(b) \nremedial actions being envisaged in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Reply: The junction of Mapou-Goodlands Road (A5 Road) and Vale Road (B12 Road) \nis a signalised T-junction. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that a survey conducted by the \nTraffic Management and Road Safety Unit (TMRSU) has revealed that during peak hours, \nthere is a high volume of traffic coming from A5 Road and Goodlands Bypass (A13 Road) \nwishing to right turn to accede onto B12 Road. As such, the vehicles have to wait for a safe \ngap to perform this right turning movement or for vehicles coming from Motorway M2 to \nprovide the right of way, as a courtesy, for vehicles on A5 to right turn onto B12 Road. In \n\n143 \n \ndoing so, traffic queues quickly build up. This high volume of right turning traffic movement \nduring peak hours is the primary cause of queueing at this signalised T-junction. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed by the TMRSU that as an immediate \nmeasure, it has provided an early cut-off for the traffic signal for the leg coming from \nMotorway M2, that is, stopping the vehicles along this leg and simultaneously increasing the \ngreen time for the traffic signal phasing along A5 Road, to cater for the high volume of right \nturning traffic movement.  \nThis measure is intended to give the high volume of right-turning vehicles on A5 Road \nmore time to clear the intersection and thus provide immediate relief for the queue build-up. \nI am further informed that, as a short-term solution, the TMRSU has worked out the \nfollowing options, for implementation by the Road Development Authority (RDA) – \n(i) \nProviding a dedicated right turning lane along A5 Road for traffic right-turning \nonto B12 Road as well as the provision of left turning slip lanes, to reduce \nqueueing by segregating turning traffic and through traffic. \n(ii) \nConstruction of a new link road from the existing roundabout at junction of A5 \nRoad and A13 (Goodlands Bypass) Road up to the B12 Road, passing next to \nDaruty Cemetery. This measure is expected to reduce traffic volume at the \nsignalised junction of A5/B12 by diverting traffic from Daruty to Petit \nRaffray/Goodlands and vice-versa. \nI am informed by the RDA that as per the design submitted by the TMRSU for the \nprovision of a slip lane from Mapou-Goodlands Road, A5 towards Vale Road, B12, land is to \nbe acquired from Societe Rouillard. The land acquisition process has already been initiated \nand is currently ongoing. \nThe RDA intends to implement the project as soon as land acquisition procedures \nwould be completed and financial clearance obtained from the Ministry of Finance. \nFORBACH ROAD, FOND DU SAC – BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "A/5",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 5,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. A/5) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie &Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to a building constructed by the District \nCouncil of Pamplemousses at Forbach Road, Fond du Sac, he will state the – \n(a)  total cost of construction thereof, indicating the initial estimated cost and final \ncost thereof;  \n(b)  date of completion thereof, and  \n\n144 \n \n(c) \nreasons why the building is not yet operational.",
      "answer": "Reply: The District Council of Pamplemousses had initiated the construction of a \nbuilding to be used as a hall in 2018/19. The building was of an extent of 213 m² consisting \nof the ground floor only.  \nThe project was implemented into two phases, namely – \n(i) \nPhase I - Construction of grey building only, and \n(ii) \nPhase II - Completion of the finishing works.  \nThe project value was set at Rs2.6 million for the setting up of the grey building only. \nHowever, the actual cost amounted to Rs2,719,500 due to the addition of two concrete steps, \nwhich was not initially included in the scope of works. This addition represented a variation \nof 4.5% of the original estimate. The works started on 01 August 2019 and was completed on \n20 April 2020. \nThe implementation of the finishing works was to be carried out partly through \ncontracting-out of the works relating to, but not limited, to tiling, plumbing, drainage, \nsewerage, while the painting works would be done by the in-house labour. \nThe cost estimates thereto amounted to Rs700,000. However, these works were \ncompleted within a total cost of Rs696,350. The works started on 11 March 2020 and were \ncompleted on 25 June 2020.  \nAs regards the works to be completed by the in-house labour of the Council, these, as \nmentioned above, are related to painting of the building. However, due to the restrictions \nwhich were prevailing in the country up to 2022 because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the \npainting works could not be completed.  \nDuring the Financial Year 2023/24, minor works were carried on site with a view of \ninaugurating the building. However, the District Council of Pamplemousses could not \nproceed with the works in 2024/25 due to financial constraints and the deployment of in-\nhouse labour to other priority works on other sites. \nThe Council is presently undertaking painting works at the building at Forbach by in-\nhouse labour. Once the works are completed, the District Council of Pamplemousses will \ncarry out some upgrading and maintenance works on the adjoining infrastructures, namely \nthe renovation of the mini-soccer pitch, the children’s playground, the pétanque courts and \nthe volleyball pitch.  \nThe inauguration of the building is planned in February 2026, once all these renovation \nworks are completed.  \n  \n\n145 \n \nMAURITIUS TOURISM AUTHORITY – PLEASURE CRAFT LICENCES – \nLICENCE HOLDERS & DATE OF ISSUE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "A/6",
      "sitting_id": "28-october-2025",
      "date": "2025-10-28",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 6,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. A/6) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Tourism whether, in regard to commercial pleasure craft licences, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Tourism Authority, information as to the \nnumber thereof issued during the period 2015 to 2024 for the coastal belt of Mont-Choisy to \nPoudre d’Or, indicating, in each case the name of the licence holder and date of issue thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: For period 2015-2024, the Mauritius Tourism Authority has issued a total of \n186 commercial pleasure craft licences for the coastal belt of Mont-Choisy to Poudre d’Or as \nfollows – \n \nYear \nNo. of Licences issued \n2015 \n18 \n2016 \n17 \n2017 \n23 \n2018 \n13 \n2019 \n11 \n2020 \n14 \n2021 \n14 \n2022 \n13 \n2023 \n29 \n2024 \n34 \nTotal \n186 \n \nThe list of licence holders with corresponding date of issue of each licence is being \nplaced in the Library of the National Assembly.",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-october-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/960",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 960,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/960) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Cyber Crime Unit, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the – \n(a) \ncomposition thereof, and  \n\n26 \n \n(b) \nnumber of statements recorded thereat over the past two years, including complaints \nreceived under the Mauritian Cybercrime Online Reporting System, indicating the \nnumber of – \n(i) \ncases prosecuted, and  \n(ii) \nconvictions secured.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the Government remains deeply committed to \nprotecting our citizens against emerging forms of crime, including those committed in the digital \nspace. As information and communication technologies continue to evolve at an exponential pace, \ncyber threats have become increasingly complex, sophisticated and transnational.  In this context, \nthe Mauritius Police Force has set up in 2006 a Cybercrime Unit under the Central Criminal \nInvestigation Department to detect, investigate, and prosecute cyber-related criminal offences. \nAs regards part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that, as at \n07 November 2025, the Cybercrime Unit is headed by an Assistant Superintendent of Police and \ncomprises 14 other Police Officers of different ranks namely – \n(a) \nanother Assistant Superintendent of Police;  \n(b) \n1 Woman Chief Inspector;  \n(c) \n1 Police Inspector;  \n(d) \n6 Police Sergeants;  \n(e) \n1 Woman Police Sergeant, and  \n(f) \n4 Police Constables. \nI am further informed, Madam Speaker, that Cybercrime-related cases are reported either at \nPolice Stations or directly at the Central CID.  They are meant to refer the cases which are complex \nin nature and which require specialised technical expertise to the Cybercrime Unit for in-depth \ninvestigation. \nFurthermore, the Police collaborates closely with the CERT-MU which is under the aegis of \nthe Ministry of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation. The CERT-MU manages \nthe Mauritian Cybercrime Online Reporting System (MAUCORS) which is a national centralised \ncyber incident reporting system that allows citizens and organisations to report cyber incidents/ \n\n27 \n \ncybercrime online. Complaints made through MAUCORS and which disclose any criminal \noffence, are also referred to the Cybercrime Unit for investigation. The complainants of such cases \nare advised to make formal declarations to the Police, and enquiries are then initiated on the basis \nof the declaration. Notwithstanding reported cases, the Cybercrime Unit may also initiate an \ninvestigation proprio motu into cases detected during cyber patrols effected by the unit.  \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that from January 2023 to 07 \nNovember 2025, a total of 837 cases including those from MAUCORS have been referred to the \nCybercrime Unit for investigation. During the course of the enquiries 1,038 statements have been \nrecorded from complainants, witnesses, as well as suspects and 120 persons have been arrested. \nOut of the 837 cases – \n(i) \n167 of them have been filed for various reasons including insufficient evidence for \nprosecution and accused being untraceable; \n(ii) \n4 cases have been filed following advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions; \n(iii) 640 cases are still under enquiry, and \n(iv) 21 cases are awaiting advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions;  \n(v) \n5 cases have been lodged before the Court. \nSo far, Madam Speaker, it is telling that no conviction has been secured.   \nThis is why, Madam Speaker, during my recent state visit to the Republic of India, I solicited \nthe assistance of India. Further to this, a team from the Maharashtra Cyber Department of the \nGovernment of Maharashtra came to Mauritius and participated in a workshop organised by the \nMinistry of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation from 30 October to 05 \nNovember 2025 on strengthening our national capabilities in cybersecurity and cybercrime \nprevention. I had a meeting with them together with the Minister for Information Technology, \nCommunication and Innovation.  We are moving forward for full collaboration with local experts \nto ensure that those people who post unwarranted posts are detected and brought to justice.   \nThis collaboration between Mauritius and Maharashtra, will enhance knowledge exchange, \ncapacity building of our law enforcement agencies and development of sustainable solutions \ntailored to the Mauritian context for restructuring of the existing processes. These are concrete \n\n28 \n \nexamples of the Government’s will to constantly improve. That is another example and we are \ngrateful to India for again helping Mauritius in this.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, supplementary question. \nMs Anquetil: Choquant ! Aucune condamnation ! D’un côté, on incite les victimes à parler \nmais de l’autre côté, on laisse les agresseurs impunis. Grave disfonctionnement ! \nLe Premier ministre peut-il indiquer à la Chambre, s’il trouve acceptable que la Cybercrime \nUnit refuse d’enregistrer une deuxième déclaration d’une victime sous prétexte qu’une première a \ndéjà été déposée ? Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. \nThe Prime Minister: I did not know if it says a first has been deposited. If there was \nsomething additional – I do not know if there was something additional – then, they should have \nhad. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \n Ms Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. À 17 ans, une élève de SC s’est \ndonnée la mort – paix à son âme – après la diffusion de photos intimes d’elle sur les réseaux.  \nLe Premier ministre peut-il indiquer à la Chambre s’il envisage la mise en place d’un Cyber \nPatrol Unit opérationnel 24 heures sur 24, capable de bloquer immédiatement toutes diffusions de \nphotos ou de propos diffamatoires sur les réseaux afin de protéger efficacement les victimes de \ncyberviolence ? Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. \nThe Prime Minister: In fact, I should also add that there were two other persons – I do not \nwant to mention names or give details – who were exactly in that position; and fortunately, the \nPolice managed to act before anybody else committed suicide or whatever. They are getting \npsychological support as well. \nHowever, as I said earlier on, this is why I said it, that it is telling that no conviction has been \nsecured because it is not working as it should. This is why I have asked for the Indian Government \nto help. They have a very, very able team. They suggested Maharashtra, and this is what we are \ndoing. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nMs Anquetil: Une dernière. \n\n29 \n \nMadam Speaker: Last question, yes. We have to move on. \nMs Anquetil: S’il vous plaît, le sujet est trop pressant. \nMadam Speaker: Of course! \nMs Anquetil: J’ai confiance. J’ai confiance que l’actuel Premier ministre prendra les \nmesures nécessaires pour mettre fin à l’impunité et protéger les victimes de cyberviolence. \nD’ailleurs, vous êtes le seul à pouvoir le faire.  \nWill the hon. Prime Minister inform the House what concrete measures are currently in place \nto support victims of cybercrime during the investigation process? Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nThe Prime Minister: I have been told that there are measures that are taken by the Police \nfirst. Then, they have a team which goes to the family and gives support, including psychological \nsupport, to make sure that nobody else goes into that situation. \nMadam Speaker: The team from the Cybercrime Unit? \nThe Prime Minister:  Yes. And also, psychologists. \nMadam Speaker: Very interesting! \nHon. Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne Longue, Mr A. Duval! \nDOMESTIC VIOLENCE – REPORTED CASES & ORDERS ISSUED (NOV 2024-NOV \n2025)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/961",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 961,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/961) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne Longue) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to domestic \nviolence, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, \ninformation as to the number of reported cases thereof since November 2024 to date, indicating \nthe number of – \n(a) \ncases in which physical violence was reported;  \n(b) \npersons charged;  \n(c) \nProtection Orders, Occupation Orders, Tenancy Orders and Ancillary Orders for \nHousehold Effects, respectively, issued. \n\n30",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, protection from domestic violence is governed under \nthe Protection from Domestic Violence Act which falls under the purview of the Ministry of \nGender Equality and Family Welfare. \nCases of domestic violence may be reported to the Police directly or to the Family Support \nServices of the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family Welfare, which thereafter refers the cases \nto the Police. \nIn regard to parts (a) and (b) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat since November 2024 to 05 November 2025, a total of 4,127 cases of domestic violence have \nbeen reported to the Police for enquiry, out of which, 3,042 cases involved physical violence.  \nFollowing enquiry into these cases, 2,103 persons have been charged with offences in breach of \nthe Protection from Domestic Violence Act. \nIn regard to part (c) of the question, the Protection from Domestic Violence Act makes \nprovisions for different types of restraining orders, namely Protection Orders, Occupation Orders, \nTenancy Orders and Ancillary Orders.  These orders are issued by the relevant District Courts \nupon application made by the victims after a hearing is held. \nMadam Speaker, since November 2024 to 05 November 2025, a total of 970 Interim \nProtection Orders have been issued by the relevant District Courts to 131 males and 839 females.  \nAn Interim Protection Order is issued by the Court where there is a serious risk of harm being \ncaused to the aggrieved spouse even before the respondent spouse is heard.  An Interim Protection \nOrder, unless the Court directs otherwise, remains in force until such time as the Court makes a \nfinal pronouncement on the application of the Protection Order. \nAfter hearing the aggrieved spouse and the respondent spouse, the Court may convert the \nInterim Protection Order into a final Protection Order which shall remain in force for such period, \nnot exceeding 24 months, as the Court may specify. Upon application, the District Court may also \nissue a Protection Order after hearing the parties. \nFor the period November 2024 to 05 November 2025, I am informed that a total of 454 \nProtection Orders has been issued by the relevant District Courts under the Protection from \nDomestic Violence Act, out of which, 54 Protection Orders have been granted to male victims and \n400 to female victims. \n\n31 \n \nAs regards Occupation, Tenancy and Ancillary Orders, I am informed that no applications \nfor such orders have been received by the Police. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to reassure the House that this Government will adopt a zero-\ntolerance policy and a victim-oriented approach to domestic abuse.  To this effect, with a view to \ndeterring domestic violence, the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family Welfare is presently \nworking on a new Domestic Abuse Bill to replace the existing Protection from Domestic Violence \nAct to strengthen the support for victims. \nFurthermore, the Brigade pour la Protection de la Famille of the Mauritius Police Force \nprovides assistance to children and women, victims of violence and abuse who solicit Police help.  \nThe Brigade also works together with the Family Support Services of the Ministry of Gender \nEquality and Family Welfare to deal with cases related to Gender-Based Violence. \nFurthermore, the Brigade pour la Protection de la Famille and the Ministry of Gender \nEquality and Family Welfare jointly carry out regular sensitisation campaigns throughout the \nisland to raise public awareness and understanding on domestic violence.  These awareness \ncampaigns are being delivered in workplaces in the private and public sectors, schools as well as \ncommunity centres, and in Non-Governmental Organisations, amongst others. Talks are also held \non TV and radio programmes. These are essential components of what we are doing. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, supplementary! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, the figures are alarming. In fact, the official figures with \nregard to domestic violence, physical violence on woman, show that there has been an increase in \nthe trend. This is confirmed now. 73% of the cases reported, according to your figures given, \nconcern physical violence. I would like to know how many out of these were \ncommitted/perpetrated against women, if the Prime Minister has the answer? \nMadam Speaker: The data. \nThe Prime Minister: I thought I had given the figures. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, he has given? \nThe Prime Minister: I will look for it. I had given the figures, but you want to know exactly \nthe number against women? \n\n32 \n \nMr A. Duval: It does not matter. \nThe Prime Minister: Okay. \nMr A. Duval: It does not matter. The point being, the hon. Prime Minister will realise that \nthere is an issue – an alarming, increasing trend. Since 2022 to date, the trend is increasing. From \nthe figures he has given us, only 15% of the domestic physical violence cases result in a Protection \nOrder. So, from 3,042, only 454 for this year have resulted in a Protection Order. And these are \nles lacunes de la loi. It is too timely, too complicated, and people are dissuaded at the level of the \npolice station itself from going forward.  \nThe new law, which was prepared since 2003, is still being awaited. Will the Prime Minister \nnow, having heard those figures, make it his mission to have that new law passed and enacted as \nsoon as possible? Time is being wasted on this. \nThe Prime Minister: I just said that the hon. Minister for Gender is looking at it as a whole. \nThey are going to bring new corrections to that. That is what I said earlier. \nMr A. Duval: May I ask a question? \nMadam Speaker: Okay, carry on. Then, I will say a word. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, may I ask the Prime Minister if he will see to it, at the level \nof the police stations, that there is – \n(1) \nthe proper staffing as is required: female officers being present to help put those \ncomplainants at ease, and  \n(2) \nthat they are given the proper training and incentives, the police officers, so that they \ntake care of those victims, even when there are repeated complainants, who are too \noften turned away?  \nSo, will he see to it that this is a priority, given the alarming trend? \nThe Prime Minister: I should remind the hon. Member – I do not want to do political \nscoring –, but for ten years, everything was allowed like this. Everything! We have taken a country \nun peu en décomposition. \nMr A. Duval: It is getting worse!  \n\n33 \n \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, but for ten years, this is the result. This is what we have inherited. \nMr A. Duval: It has been one year; it is getting worse. \nThe Prime Minister: The hon. Minister is doing her best, believe me. But we have inherited \nthis situation.  \nMr A. Duval: The law was… \nThe Prime Minister: So, we are… Yes, 2023, you just said. \nI did say that the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family Welfare is presently working on a \nnew Domestic Abuse bill. Precisely because they want to strengthen the support for victims. This \nis what is being done. \nAn hon. Member: Ancien minis gender… \nMadam Speaker: Privilege of Speaker, please! May I just say a few words? Because both \nMembers, who have spoken today, have spoken about violence. And in this first case, was violence \nagainst that young girl, and both Members are member of the Gender Caucus. I just want to tell \neverybody that you will be receiving very soon the programme of what the Gender Caucus itself, \nwhich means the National Assembly – the Prime Minister knows a bit about it and the Minister as \nwell – we are organising, with the United Nations and the UNDP, a big event between 25 \nNovember, which is the date of the elimination of gender-based violence and 10 December, which \nis Human Rights Day. We are having a big event where I would like all of you to come with your \nfriends because it is going to touch on all these issues of sensitisation because we have to keep on \nsensitising on the issue of violence, unfortunately. So, I am telling you now. I am very proud that \ntwo members of the Gender Caucus have spoken this morning. Thank you. \nNext, I am calling on hon. Lukeeram! \nFORMER PRIME MINISTER – ADVISERS – NAMES & PAY PACKAGES – PERIOD \n2015-NOVEMBER 2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/962",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 962,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/962) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Advisers whose \nservices were retained by the former Prime Minister, he will state the names and pay packages \n\n34 \n \nthereof, including the boards on which they equally served over the period 2015 to November \n2024.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed that 31 Advisers were employed by \nthe Prime Minister’s Office over the period 2015 to November 2024. These include 4 Special \nAdvisers, 11 Senior Advisers and 16 Advisers.  \nI wish to point out that under the former Government, there was actually a carefully crafted \nploy to boost up the income of Advisers by allowing them to sit on numerous Boards. Very often, \nthese Advisers were earning revenues from these Boards, which were higher than their initial \nsalary.  \nMadam Speaker, let me make it clear, my Government is committed to ending this \ndiscretionary and arbitrary practice of the past, where public funds were allocated based on \npersonal wishes or political convenience. We believe that the remuneration of advisers should not \nbe left to the whims of whoever comes into power. Instead, it should be governed by clear, \ntransparent and fair principles.   \nIn this endeavour, my Government has decided, I mentioned it last time, to rationalise the \ncategories of Advisers. \nIn regard to the information requested by the hon. Member, I am tabling a list of former \nAdvisers, which includes their salary packages and the boards and committees on which they \nequally served during period 2015 to November 2024.  \nI wish also to say... the list is very long. But I can tell you, for example – \n \nMr Ramprakash Maunthrooa, Special Adviser to the Prime Minister. He got a salary \nof Rs8.1 million as Special Adviser. But he sat on 14 boards and 7 committees, \nadditionally and for that he got Rs15 million from January 2015 to November 2024, \nwhich makes you a total of Rs23.1 million. \n(Interruptions) \nAnd, these people want to come back to power. Guess why? \n(Interruptions) \n\n35 \n \n Another one, Mr Nayen Koomar Ballah, Special Adviser to the Prime Minister, Rs3.5 \nmillion from November 2023 to November 2024. But he sat on 9 boards and he \nreceived Rs7.5 million from February 2023 to November 2024, which makes you a \ntotal of the Rs11 million. To ena rezon fami sa! \n Mr Kreedeo Beekharry, Senior Adviser, Rs7.6 million and then he sat on 6 boards \nand 3 committees, which makes you a total of Rs23.6 million. He got even more than \nMr Maunthrooa who got Rs23.1million. \n Mrs Sarah Rawat Currimjee, Senior Adviser, Rs8.3 million, plus 6 boards and 2 \ncommittees and she received Rs9 million, total Rs17.3 million. \nMr Mohamed: Adrien em pe gagn sok!  \nMr Jhummun: Koze Adrien !  \nMr Mohamed: ...twa to pli... \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: Are you sure that instead of being him Deputy Speaker … \nMadam Speaker: Chut! \nThe Prime Minister: … he should have gone for that job. \nMr Ken Arian, Senior Adviser… \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, I can’t hear the Prime Minister. \nMr Bhagwan: Tane sa nom la Ken Arian! \nThe Prime Minister: Rs3.8 million as Senior Adviser plus he sat on 7 boards and 4 \ncommittees. For this, he got Rs11.3 million. In other words, Rs15.1 million.  \n(Interruptions) \nThis is the kind of abuse the MSM did, this is the kind of abuse. \nMs Anquetil: Shame! \n\n36 \n \nThe Prime Minister: And they want to … come back into government. They have already \ndestroyed this country. They want to redestroy what we are trying to build now. \nI must inform the House that the list of Advisers includes a particular Adviser whose \nspecialty, you know what was it? “Ojha”, Mr Bachoo knows what does mean “ojha’’. He was an \n“ojha’’.  \n(Interruptions) \n... prayers, supposedly prayers and he got a monthly salary of Rs32,350. But I will circulate the \nrest. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Yes, you are done? You are okay? \nAlright! Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d'Or! \nMR. K. P. – CONTRACT – REMUNERATION & OVERSEAS MISSIONS – \nPERIOD 2015 TO 2024",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/963",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 963,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/963) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mr. K. P., he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to the Ministries, Government and Parastatal Bodies \nin which he held remunerated positions since 2015 to 2024, indicating in each case, the – \n(a)  capacity thereof; \n(b)  terms and conditions of contract, including remuneration, allowances and benefits \ndrawn, and  \n(c)  overseas missions undertaken, indicating costs incurred, countries visited, duration and \nnames of accompanying persons, if any.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Director General of the \nMauritius Broadcasting Corporation that in 2015, Mr Kavish Pultoo was employed as Journaliste \nReporteur D’Images, on a permanent and pensionable basis, at the MBC and the post was restyled \nto that of News Editor/Senior News Editor in 2017.  Mr Pultoo was then drawing a monthly salary \nof Rs53,200 along with a monthly allowance amounting to Rs13,960.  \n\n37 \n \nIn his capacity as News Editor/Senior News Editor, Mr Pultoo accompanied the then Prime \nMinister on two overseas missions to New York and India in 2017 and 2019, respectively.  The \ntotal costs of these two missions, including air tickets and per diem, amounting to Rs309,376.84. \nThese were met by the MBC. \nOn 18 February 2020, Mr Pultoo was offered employment, on a contractual basis for a period \nof one year, as Adviser on Information Matters by the Prime Minister’s Office and was posted at \nthe Ministry of Health and Wellness. Subsequently, he was granted leave without pay by the MBC. \nHis contract as Adviser on Information Matters was renewed on 20 February 2021 for a further \nperiod of one year, under the same terms and conditions.  During his tenure as Adviser on \nInformation Matters, Mr Pultoo was drawing a monthly salary of Rs59,700 and allowances to the \ntune of Rs15,365.  \nHowever, on 23 April 2021, Mr Pultoo was offered employment as Senior Adviser on Policy \nand Communication Matters by the Ministry of Health and Wellness. The House may wish to note \nthat his contract of employment was backdated to 20 February 2021 and he was offered a salary, \nincluding allowances of Rs109,630.  On renewal of his contract, that is on 20 February 2022, his \nsalary inclusive of allowances were then capped to Rs119,065, which was almost twice his initial \nsalary as Adviser on Information Matters. \nI am further informed, Madam Speaker, that on 01 July 2022, Mr Pultoo was appointed as \nDirector, Information Services on a contractual basis for a period of one year.  In this capacity, he \nwas drawing a monthly salary of Rs100,750 along with allowances of Rs44,930, that is, a total of \nRs145,630 on a monthly basis.   \nHis contract as Director of Information Services was renewed for a further period of one \nyear with effect from 01 July 2023. \nFurther, in his capacity as Director of Information Services, and by virtue of section 6(1)(c) \nof the Mauritius Broadcasting Corporation Act, Mr Pultoo was appointed as Member of the MBC \nBoard from 07 July 2022 to March 2024.  \nDuring his tenure on the MBC Board, Mr Pultoo also served on the following three sub-\ncommittees. You see the ploy of appointing them and then putting them on different committees \nonboard. He was also on three sub-committees – \n\n38 \n \n(i) \nProgrammes Committee; \n(ii) \nAudit and Risk Management Committee, and \n(iii) Corporate Governance Committee. \nHe was paid a total of Rs312,000 for serving on these three sub-committees. \nI am also informed that on 12 February 2024, Mr Pultoo resigned as Director of Information \nServices following his appointment as Senior Adviser on Communication and Strategic Matters in \nthe Prime Minister’s Office. In this capacity, he drew a monthly salary of Rs128,875 and \nallowances amounting to Rs22,470. \nThe contract of Mr Pultoo as Senior Adviser on Communication and Strategic Matters was \nterminated on 15 November 2024. \nI am informed, Madam Speaker, that on 18 November 2024, Mr Pultoo resumed duty at the \nMBC and proceeded on leave as from 19 November 2024. He subsequently submitted his \nresignation to the MBC with effect from 21 January 2025. \n \nConcerning missions attended by Mr Pultoo from 2015 to 2024, the latter proceeded on 10 \noverseas missions, out of which, he accompanied the former Prime Minister on eight occasions. \nThe 10 missions were at the cost of Rs1,359,997.57. It is worth highlighting that one of the \nmissions, which was undertaken in May 2024, was purportedly an urgent security mission whereby \nMr Pultoo accompanied the former Acting Director of the Counter Terrorism Unit, Mr Lilram \nDeal. \nI am tabling the additional information sought by the hon. Member and I remind them that \ninquiries are ongoing. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, do you have a supplementary? That would be one minute left.  \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Given the staggering amount revealed in the reply, \nwill the hon. Prime Minister inform the House, whether all these appointments and every rupee \nspent were in strict compliance with government policies at the time they were made and incurred, \nand if not, will there be inquiry on it?  \nThank you.    \n\n39 \n \nThe Prime Minister: The then government decided what they would do. If they liked your \nface, they would give you anything.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay, time is up! Hon. Members, the Table has been advised that the \nfollowing PQs have been withdrawn: B/968, B/970, B973, B/976, B/977, B/983, B/1004.  \nNow, questions to hon. Ministers. We got less than half an hour to go before lunch.  \nHon. First Member for Rodrigues, Ms Collet. \nCENTRAL ELECTRICITY BOARD, RODRIGUES – POWER SUPPLY AND \nDEMAND – RENEWABLE ENERGY INITIATIVES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/964",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 964,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/964) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Air Mauritius Ltd., \nmoving operations to London Gatwick Airport in the United Kingdom since 29 October 2023, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe reasons therefor, indicating if the decision emanated from a commercial and/or \nfinancial survey; \n(b) \nthe gains/losses, if any, incurred – \n(i) \nalong that route, and \n(ii) \nfor leasing its slots at the London Heathrow Airport, indicating to which \nentity same was leased, and \n(c) \nwhether consideration will be given to reverting operations to London Heathrow \nAirport and, if so, when and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Reply: I wish to inform the House that Air Mauritius Ltd started its operations to London \nHeathrow Airport in 1973 and still holds three historical slots thereat. On 17 March 2023, the \nCompany issued a communiqué announcing that as from 28 October 2023, Air Mauritius Ltd \nwould move its operations from London Heathrow Airport to London Gatwick Airport with daily \noperations. \nIn regard to part (a) of the question, I am advised that the then Board of Directors of Air \nMauritius Ltd presided by Mr Marday Venketasamy, including inter alia – \n1) \nMr Nayen Koomar Ballah; \n2) \nMrs Ammanah Ragavoodoo; \n3) \nMr Ken Arian; \n4) \nMr Jitendra Nathsingh Bissessur; \n5) \nMr Azim Fakhruddin Currimjee; \n6) \nMr Surendra Teeluck; \n7) \nMr Philippe E.G. Maxime Sauzier, and \n\n127 \n \n8) \nMr Arvind Bundhun. \napproved the proposal of the then Management which comprised – \n(i) \nMr Krêsimir Kûcko, Chief Executive Officer; \n(ii) \nMr Indradev (Raja) Buton, Chief Operations Officer, and  \n(iii) \nMr Laurent Recoura, Chief Commercial Officer. \nto shift Air Mauritius London operations from Heathrow to Gatwick. \nThis decision was based on the following considerations – \n(i) \nCAPA Consulting, which was commissioned by Air Mauritius Ltd in February 2019 \nto undertake business reviews, had consistently recommended Air Mauritius Ltd to \nshift the London operations from London Heathrow Airport to London Gatwick \nAirport to support long term growth; \n(ii) \nthe scope of growth at London Heathrow Airport was constrained as Air Mauritius Ltd \nheld only three pairs of slots at London Heathrow Airport, without the possibility of \nobtaining additional ones, thereby restraining its operations to three weekly flights to \nLondon Heathrow Airport; \n(iii) there was no interest from UK airlines based at London Heathrow Airport to conclude \nany commercial arrangement with Air Mauritius Ltd, thus preventing seamless \nconnections to and from domestic UK airports and other European destinations;  \n(iv) airport charges and passenger service fees were lower at London Gatwick compared \nto London Heathrow.  Furthermore, London Heathrow Airport had announced further \nincreases in charges as from 2024; \n(v) \nthe move allegedly enabled Air Mauritius to provide daily flights to London Gatwick \nAirport instead of three weekly flights to London Heathrow, thereby enhancing travel \nand trade at large, and more specifically in support to the tourism industry, and \n(vi) the relocation facilitated the conclusion in November 2023 of a commercial \narrangement between Air Mauritius and EasyJet Airline, whose main hub is at London \nGatwick Airport, from where EasyJet provides two-way connections across the UK \nand a huge intra-Europe network.   \n\n128 \n \nThe House may wish to know that during the period 27 June 2018 to 17 March 2020, a sum \nof USD 928,997, approximately Rs36.2 million was paid to CAPA Consulting by Air Mauritius \nLtd. \nI am informed that before the final decision was taken to move the operations from London \nHeathrow Airport to London Gatwick Airport, a presentation was made to the then Prime Minister \nin February 2023, following which the decision was taken by the then Board of Air Mauritius Ltd \nto move its operations to London Gatwick Airport in 2023. \nWith regard to part (b)(i) of the question, I wish to inform the House that from October 2023 \nto March 2024 Air Mauritius Ltd registered a loss of around Rs920 million for operating to London \nGatwick Airport. Furthermore, for the Financial Year 2024-2025, a financial loss amounting to \napproximately Rs1.7 billion was registered for operating to London Gatwick Airport. Therefore, \nover a period of 17 months, that is, from October 2023 to March 2025, a loss of approximately \nRs2.6 billion was incurred by Air Mauritius Ltd. \nIn view of the losses incurred on the Mauritius-London Gatwick route with daily flights, Air \nMauritius has implemented a series of corrective measures, including a reduction in the London \nGatwick operations from seven weekly flights to five weekly flights as from May 2025. \n Concerning part (b)(ii) of the question, I am given to understand that the three London \nHeathrow slots have been leased to Qatar Airways for an annual fee of USD 881,000 i.e. about \nRs41,407,000. \nAs regards part (c) of the question, I wish to apprise the House that, as soon as I became \nPrime Minister, I informed the new Management of Air Mauritius Ltd that we must resume our \nflights to Heathrow. Accordingly, the Company is exploring all avenues for reverting to London \nHeathrow Airport. However, it seems that flights to London Heathrow cannot be effected before \nApril 2027 in view of the undertakings contained in the London Heathrow slots Lease Agreement. \nWe will pursue all avenues for Air Mauritius to revert to Heathrow at the earliest. \n \nMR M.R. – ARRIVALS IN MAURITIUS – ASSETS ACQUISITION – BOARD OF \nINQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/965",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 965,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/965) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \n\n129 \n \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mr M. R., he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe number of assets acquired by him in Mauritius, indicating the year of his initial \ninvestment;  \n(b) \nthe number of times he travelled to Mauritius, indicating whether due diligence was \ncarried out thereon, and  \n(c) \nwhether consideration will be given for the setting up of a Board of Inquiry to shed \nlight on his recent arrival in Mauritius.",
      "answer": "Reply: As the hon. Member is aware an investigation involving Mr M.R. has been initiated \nby the Financial Crimes Commission (FCC). By virtue of section 161 of the FCC Act, no \ninformation obtained in the discharge of the functions and powers under the Act can be divulged. \nThe hon. Member will, therefore, appreciate that it would not be appropriate at this stage to provide \nthe details he has requested at parts (a) and (b) of the question. \nIn regard to part (c) of the question, in view of the ongoing investigation being conducted \nby the FCC, the establishment of a Board of Inquiry is not warranted at this juncture. Furthermore, \nthe initiation of such an inquiry at this stage may unduly interfere with, or otherwise impede, the \nproper and efficient conduct of the FCC’s ongoing investigation. \n \nTRAINER, JOCKEY & APPRENTICE JOCKEY LICENCES – 2025 SEASON",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/966",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 966,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/966) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Trainer Licence, \nJockey Licence and Apprentice Jockey Licence, respectively, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Gambling Regulatory Authority, information as to the number thereof issued for \nthe 2025 season, indicating the – \n(a) \nnumber and dates of applications received;  \n(b) \ndates of examinations, if any  \n(c) \nresults obtained by candidates;  \n(d) \ndates of issue of licence;  \n(e) \nselection criteria, and  \n(f) \nterms and conditions thereof. \n\n130",
      "answer": "Reply: As the House is aware, under the previous Government, the horse racing industry \nwas being driven towards its demise. This Government has saved the horse racing industry with \nmajor reforms and quick actions were taken to address major issues to revamp this industry.  One \nof the reforms was to restore confidence and integrity in the licensing process. \nI am informed by the Gambling Regulatory Authority that until the repeal of Part IIIA of the \nGambling Regulatory Authority Act in 2025, it was the Horse Racing Division that was \nempowered to issue licences to Trainers, Jockeys and Apprentice Jockeys, respectively. \nFollowing the repeal of the section setting up the Horse Racing Division in January 2025, \nthe powers delegated to the Horse Racing Division pursuant to Sections 15(A)(1) and 15(A)(2) of \nthe Gambling Regulatory Authority Act, were restituted in full, to the Gambling Regulatory \nAuthority Board.  Consequently, since then, all applications for Trainer Licence, Jockey Licence \nand Apprentice Jockey Licence are now dealt with by the Board. \nI am further informed that on 07 March 2025, in view of the start of the new racing season \n2025, a press communiqué was issued inviting potential new trainers, assistant trainers, stable \nsupervisors, jockeys, apprentice jockeys and track riders to submit their applications to the \nGambling Regulatory Authority. \nAll applications received at the Authority were duly examined, processed and submitted to \nthe Licensing Committee for recommendation to the Gambling Regulatory Authority Board for \napproval. \nFor the 2025 Horse Racing season, the total number of licences issued were as follows – \n \nTrainer licence: 11 \n \nJockey licence: 23 \n \nApprentice Jockey licence: 9 \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Gambling Regulatory Authority \nthat for the 2025 Horse Racing season – \n \n22 applications were received for Trainers’ Licence; \n \n38 applications were received for Jockey Licences, out of which 11 for foreign Jockey \nLicences and 27 for local Jockey Licences, and \n\n131 \n \n \n24 applications were received for Apprentice Jockey licence. \nConcerning part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Gambling Regulatory Authority \nthat a written examination was held on 28 July 2025 for new trainers in line with the Rules of \nRacing 2024. \nThere is no such requirement for written examination for existing Trainers, Jockeys and \nApprentice Jockeys. \nAs regards part (c) of the question, I am informed that out of the 22 applications for a Trainer \nLicence, 17 were applying for renewal of their licences and 5 had applied for new licences. \nBased on the qualifying criteria, only 2 out of the five were eligible to sit for the examination. \nThey were both successful. \nI am placing in the Library of the National Assembly a copy of the information on – \n part (a) relating to the number and dates of applications received; \n part (d) regarding the dates of issue of licence; \n part (e) concerning the selection criteria, and  \n part (f) on the terms and conditions. \n \nDRIVING LICENCES – DRIVERS’ FITNESS – DEFERRAL POLICY FOR DRIVING \nPROHIBITION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/967",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 967,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/967) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the driving licences, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to \nwhether there is a policy for the deferral thereof for people suffering from medical conditions \nmandating driving prohibition.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that in accordance with Section 45 of \nthe Road Traffic Act, applicants for a driving licence must declare their mental and physical fitness \nto a Licensing Officer at the Traffic Branch.  \nI am further informed that if during the driving test, an applicant shows signs of physical \ndisability, the test is discontinued and the applicant is referred to the Police Medical Officer for \n\n132 \n \nmedical examination. Moreover, if the Police is informed by way of a complaint from any person \nor report from any Medical Practitioner that any holder of a driving licence suffers from a disabling \ncondition, the holder is requested to surrender his driving licence to the Police pending a medical \nexamination by a Police Medical Officer. The licence may be restored, modified or revoked upon \nadvice and recommendation of the Police Medical Officer.  \nFor individuals aged 60 and above applying for a driving licence for the first time, a medical \ncertificate proving fitness to drive may be required if the Licensing Officer deems it necessary.  \nHowever, an aggrieved individual can make an appeal to the decision of a Licensing Officer \nregarding the renewal or revocation of his driving licence under Section 51 of the Road Traffic \nAct.  \nAs at 07 November 2025, 3,255 driving licences have been issued after medical clearance, \nwhile 112 have been revoked based on medical advice. \nCOVID-19 (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 2020 – PROSECUTIONS, \nCONVICTIONS & FINES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/968",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 968,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/968) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the COVID-19 (Miscellaneous \nProvisions) Act 2020, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of \nPolice, information as to the number of individuals prosecuted thereunder, indicating the – \n(a)  number of convictions secured, and  \n(b)  total value of the fines imposed and collected in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCHILDREN WITH SERIOUS BEHAVIOURAL CONCERNS – ASSESSMENT – \nPROBATION OFFICERS – RENUMERATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/969",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 969,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/969) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to children with serious \nbehavioural concerns, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether an \nassessment has been made of the consequences of the failure of drawing of parenting support \n\n133 \n \nintervention plans and carrying out home visits in such cases as per the provisions of the Children’s \nAct on the safety and well-being of children and families concerned therewith, indicating if the \nrequests made by Probation Officers concerned therewith for a review of their renumerations in \nconsideration thereof is being addressed.",
      "answer": "Reply: The Children’s Act 2020, which came into force on 24 January 2022, has introduced \nadditional duties upon officers of the Probation and Aftercare Service, including the preparation \nof Parenting Support Intervention Plans and conducting home visits to ensure the safety and well-\nbeing of children and families. \nOne of the duties under the Children’s Act relates to children with serious behavioural \nconcerns. In such cases, the Probation Officer carries out parenting support interventions to assist \nparents in managing the child’s behaviour. This includes conducting a psycho-social assessment, \npreparing a parenting support intervention plan with home visits, and issuing a letter of outcome \nwithin 21 days for any further judicial action. \nThe effective performance of these duties is crucial to ensuring the safety, stability, and well-\nbeing of children and their families. Probation Officers play a central role in identifying underlying \nissues, strengthening family relationships, and preventing children from exposure to neglect, \nviolence, or negative social influences.  \nI am informed that, following the proclamation of the Children’s Act which introduced \nadditional duties, the Probation Officers Union made representations and requested for an \nappropriate allowance on 25 January 2022. A tripartite meeting was held at the level of the Prime \nMinister`s Office on 14 February 2022. Subsequently, a request was made for the payment of an \nappropriate allowance on 25 February 2022 to the then Ministry of Public Service, Administrative \nand Institutional Reforms. The said Ministry recommended the payment of an ‘On-call’ and ‘In-\nAttendance’ Allowance for duties in relation to recording of statements. Following consultations \nwith the Pay Research Bureau, in June 2024, the said Ministry recommended the payment of an \nallowance equivalent to one increment to Probation Officers. However, the Union did not agree to \nthe proposals and requested for a monthly allowance of Rs4,200. Despite their dissatisfaction, the \nofficers performed part of the duties under the Children’s Act until April 2025, when they ceased \nall duties. \nIn May 2025, the High-Powered Committee agreed to the payment of an allowance \nequivalent to two increments to Probation Officers and Senior Probation Officers, with arrears \n\n134 \n \npending amendments to their Schemes of Service. The Union, thereafter, agreed to resume duties \nas from 15 July 2025, but did not agree to be in attendance at the recording of statements by Police \nOfficers from juvenile offenders, child victims and child witnesses. However, when the Ministry \nof Public Service and Administrative Reforms informed that the payment of the allowance was \nsubject to the performance of all duties under the Children’s Act, the Union informed in a letter \ndated 9 September 2025, that the officers would stop performing all duties unless they are \nappropriately remunerated.   \nThe stand adopted by the Union has seriously impacted on the services offered leaving the \nneeds of children and the concerns of parents unattended as well as undermining the proper \nfunctioning of relevant authorities such as the Children’s Court and the Police. \nIn view of the above, on 27 October 2025, my Office requested the Union to inform the \nProbation Officers that they should perform all assigned tasks diligently, ensuring compliance with \nall policies, procedures and ethical standards. \nConsultations are ongoing. \nCASINOS OF MAURITIUS – RESTRUCTURING – EXPECTED TIMEFRAME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/970",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 970,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/970) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the proposed \nrestructuring of the Casinos of Mauritius, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information \nas to the expected timeframe for the implementation thereof, giving details thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \nSPECIALISED POLICE UNITS – BODY-WORN CAMERAS & TASERS PROVISION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/971",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 971,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/971) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne Longue) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Emergency \nResponse Service, the Anti-Drug and Smuggling Unit, the Criminal Investigation Division, the \nTraffic Branch and other specialised units, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \n\n135 \n \nCommissioner of Police, information as to whether consideration is being given to equipping \npolice officers serving therein with body-worn cameras and tasers for their enhanced protection \nand ensuring more effective law enforcement.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that Police Officers, irrespective of \ntheir postings, are provided with equipment to protect themselves in the performance of their \nduties. They are also provided with training on the proper use of such equipment. \nI am further informed that the Commissioner of Police has agreed to the introduction of both \nbody-worn cameras and taser for use by the Police. The Commissioner of Police has already set \nup a technical committee to work on the required amendments to the relevant legislations and the \nstandard operating procedures for the use of these equipment. \n \nNOISE POLLUTION – POLICE MONITORING & CONTRAVENTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025",
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/972",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 972,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/972) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne Longue) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the detection, \ncontrol and prevention of noise pollution, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the number of – \n(a) \nfunctional noise nuisance recorders currently available within the Mauritius Police \nForce, indicating the police units and/or stations to which same have been allocated, \nand  \n(b)  contraventions booked for noise nuisance related offences since November 2024 to \ndate.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that detection, control and prevention \nof noise pollution is governed by the following two regulations – \n(i) \nthe Environment Protection (Control of Noise) Regulations 2022, and \n(ii) \nthe Environment Protection (Environmental Standards for Noise) Regulations 2022. \n\n136 \n \nUnder the Environment Protection (Control of Noise) Regulations 2022, the following \nfactors are taken into consideration for the purpose of determining whether a noise constitutes a \nnuisance – \n(a) \nthe intensity of the noise as perceived by the ears; \n(b) \nthe type of noise emitted; \n(c) \nthe manner in which the noise is produced, and \n(d) \nthe protection level of interference. \nThe Police de l’Environnement deals with noise pollution and disturbances associated with \nloud music from houses, bungalows and villas mainly on the coastal areas and on public beaches. \nSince these incidents are often one-off and mostly occur at odd hours, the Police handles these \ncomplaints for security reasons and prompt interventions.  \nThe said regulations provide for a fixed penalty of Rs10,000 for the offence of noise \npollution constituting a nuisance. The Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management and \nClimate Change has been requested to amend the regulations to increase the fine to discourage \nsuch nuisances. \nThe Environment Protection (Environmental Standards for Noise) Regulations 2022 provide \nfor 3 categories of noise, namely industrial, neighbourhood and power stations and their respective \nmaximum permissible levels. The level of permissible noise is determined by the use of a ‘Sound \nLevel Metre’ as prescribed in these regulations. In such cases, upon receipt of a complaint \npertaining to noise pollution, the Police solicits the services of the Health Engineering Section of \nthe Ministry of Health and Wellness to measure the level of noise.  \nAs regards part (a) of the question, I am informed that the Police de l’Environnement is in \npossession of 2 sound level metres, while the Health Engineering Section of the Ministry of Health \nand Wellness is in possession of 14 sound level metres.  \nI have already requested the Commissioner of Police to initiate appropriate actions for the \nprocurement of additional sound level metres to better equip the Police de l’Environnement. \n\n137 \n \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that 1,225 \ncontraventions have been established for noise-related offences from November 2024 to 06 \nNovember 2025. \n \nNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION – COMPOSITION & SELECTION \nPROCESS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/973",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 973,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/973) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the National Human Rights \nCommission, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the current composition \nthereof, indicating the selection process behind same and the basis on which the directors are \nchosen.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nINDEPENDENT COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION – FORMER DIRECTOR \nGENERAL – OFFICE RENOVATION (2020)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/974",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 974,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/974) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the renovation of the office \nof the Director General of the then Independent Commission against Corruption in 2020, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the – \n(a) \nFinancial Crimes Commission, information as to the – \n(i) \nthe scope of works; \n(ii) \ndetailed project cost, and \n(iii) \nlist of bidders and name of selected bidder, and \n(b) \nCommissioner of Police, information as to whether an inquiry has been carried out \nthereinto.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Financial Crimes Commission that in June 2020, a procurement \nexercise was launched for partitioning works in the office of the Director General of the then \nIndependent Commission Against Corruption. \n\n138 \n \nThe scope of works consisted of the supply and fixing of wooden partitions with frosted \nglazing and door. The then ICAC invited bids from eight suppliers. \nQuotations were received from only three bidders, namely – \n(i) \nPanache and Co. Ltd; \n(ii) \nMicaplus Co. Ltd, and \n(iii) \nFurnicon Ltd. \nFollowing evaluation, Panache and Co. Ltd was selected. Subsequently, the contract was \nawarded to Panache and Co. Ltd for a lump sum of Rs162,035, inclusive of VAT on 24 June 2020, \nand the partitioning work was completed on 13 August 2020. \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that as at \n07 November 2025, no case was reported to the Police regarding renovation works at the office of \nthe Director General of the then ICAC. \n \nMAURITIUS POLICE FORCE – STAFFING CAPACITY ASSESSMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/975",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 975,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/975) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Mauritius Police Force, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to – \n(a) \nthe number of police officers per ranks, and \n(b) \nwhether the current capacity thereof is able to deliver results and, if so, how and, if \nnot, whether the recruitment of cadet officers is being envisaged.",
      "answer": "Reply: In regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat as at 06 November 2025, there was a total of 13,196 Police Officers in different ranks in the \nMauritius Police Force, including 398 temporary Police Constables. The details on the number of \nPolice Officers in each rank are being placed in the Library of the National Assembly. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that, presently, 1,235 funded posts are \nvacant in different grades.  However, the Mauritius Police Force is ensuring public safety and \nsecurity with the existing workforce and available resources through the following measures to \nsupport the Police in the frontline – \n\n139 \n \n(a) \nreview of the shift system and restructuring of specialised units, such as the Emergency \nResponse Service and the Divisional Support Unit; \n(b) \nreinforcing station personnel, as and when required, by officers carrying out back-\noffice duties;  \n(c) \ndeployment on a daily basis of elements of the Special Mobile Force, Special Support \nUnit, and the National Coast Guard to support other divisions, and \n(d) \nreorganisation of duties at police station level. \nI am informed that Cadet Officers are enlisted in a trainee capacity as and when required, to \nbe posted in specialised Branches or Divisions. Upon successful completion of their training \nperiod, they are appointed Deputy Assistant Superintendent of Police in a temporary capacity. \nOn 25 August 2025, the Police has made recommendation to the Disciplinary Forces Service \nCommission for the enlistment of two Cadet Officers, one for the Flying Branch of the Police \nHelicopter Squadron and one for the Flying Branch of the National Coast Guard. \nThe House may wish to note that the Mauritius Police Force is facing difficulties to attract \nnew recruits satisfying the selection criteria for the post of Police Constables. \nFor the last selection exercise carried out by the Disciplined Forces Service Commission \naround May 2025, for the recruitment of 1,200 Police Constables and Woman Police Constables, \nonly 412 were offered enlistment as a large number of candidates had, at the initial stage, been \neliminated for not satisfying the different criteria for selection.  Subsequently, after completion of \nthe process, on 03 November 2025, only 398 successful candidates had reported for training at the \nPolice Training School. \nIn spite of interest shown by members of the public, it had been observed that around 900 \ncandidates either did not possess the required minimum educational qualifications or had failed \nthe Height Test or Physical Aptitude Test. \nAfter consultation with the Disciplined Forces Service Commission, a committee has been \nset up to look into ways and means to attract a greater number of potential candidates to join the \nPolice Force and to retain them. \n \nOLD GRAND PORT – CIVIL STATUS OFFICE – REOPENING \n\n140",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/976",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 976,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/976) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Civil Status Office at \nOld Grand Port, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the reasons for its \nclosure, indicating since when it is closed and whether consideration will be given for the \nreopening thereof to facilitate access to vital registration services for residents of Grand Sable, Old \nGrand Port, Bambous Virieux and surrounding areas.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS – LOANS’ CONDITIONS – REVIEW & \nINTERNATIONAL NORMS & STANDARDS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/977",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 977,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/977) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the bank \ncharges, fees and collateral securities regarding loans granted by financial institutions, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the Bank of Mauritius, information as to – \n(a) \nwhen same were last reviewed, and  \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given to aligning same to international norms and \nstandards applicable in other jurisdictions.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGRAND PORT-QUATRE SOEURS – RADIO-BROADCAST SIGNAL – RECEPTION \nDEFICIENCIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/978",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 978,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/978) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of Energy \nand Public Utilities whether, in regard to Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Central Electricity Board, information as to whether it currently has the capacity to meet \nthe energy demands of residential, commercial, agricultural and industrial customers, indicating \nthe plans, if any, in place to – \n(a) \nenhance energy infrastructure and ensure supply reliability across all sectors, and \n (b) collaborate with the Rodrigues Regional Assembly to implement renewable energy \ninitiatives or otherwise, giving details of the targets and timelines established for the \ntransition.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, la CEB m'informe que la capacité de production \nd'électricité de Rodrigues est suffisante pour répondre aux besoins énergétiques des clients \nrésidentiels, commerciaux, agricoles et industriels. La demande de puissance maximale jamais \nenregistrée à Rodrigues est de 9,53 MW, atteinte le 17 mars 2025 à 18h30. La capacité effective \ndes centrales thermiques de Rodrigues s'élève à 11,4 MW et la capacité effective totale de toutes \nles unités de production, y compris les parcs photovoltaïques et éoliens, atteint 13,7 MW. Il \nconvient de noter qu’un système de stockage d'énergie batterie (BESS) d'une capacité de 1,5 MW \npeut également être utilisé pour répondre à la demande lors des pics de consommation. \nEn ce qui concerne la partie (a) de la question, je souhaite informer la Chambre que, pour \naméliorer l’infrastructure énergétique et assurer la fiabilité de l’approvisionnement dans tous les \nsecteurs à Rodrigues, plusieurs projets clés ont été identifiés par le CEB et sont en cours de \nréalisation – \n\n40 \n \n(i) \nInstallation de deux systèmes de stockage des batteries pour répondre à la des pointes \nde consommation, d'une puissance nominale de 1 MW/2 MW chacun, à Pointe \nMonnier et Grenade d'ici fin 2026. Ces batteries, BESS, outre la satisfaction de la \ndemande lors des pics de consommation, amélioreront également la stabilité du réseau \net permettront une intégration accrue des énergies renouvelables. L'appel d'offres a \ndéjà été lancé en août 2025 et la date de clôture est prévue pour le 12 novembre 2025, \ndonc demain ; \n(ii) \nune nouvelle centrale thermique d’une capacité de 1,9 à 2,5 MW sera installée à Pointe \nMonnier d’ici le dernier trimestre 2027. L’appel d’offres pour ce projet est \nactuellement en cours d’examen au CPB ; \n(iii) extension de la centrale photovoltaïque de Grenade avec une centrale photovoltaïque \nsupplémentaire de 1 MW d'ici fin 2027 ; \n(iv) la reconversion du parc éolien de Trèfles, dont les éoliennes sont obsolètes et coûteuses \nà exploiter, en une centrale photovoltaïque de 500 kW couplée à un système de \nstockage d'énergie par batterie d'au moins 1 MWh. Donc, tous les projets que nous \navons jusqu’ici, que ce soit à l’île Maurice ou à Rodrigues, seront couplé des batteries \ndorénavant ; \n(v) \nencourager et soutenir le déploiement des énergies renouvelables pour les particuliers \nbénéficiant de différents programmes SSDG, pour les petits et MSDG, moyens, dont \ncertains sont entièrement financés par le CEB. Les programmes SSDG et MSDG \nseront modernisés grâce,  \nencore une fois, à l'intégration de systèmes de stockage d'énergie par batterie (BESS) \nafin de leur permettre de réduire leur consommation d'énergie sur le réseau pendant les \npériodes de pointe ; \n(vi) évaluation des demandes reçues dans le cadre du programme agrivoltaïque, donc ici à \nMaurice agrivoltaïque et aussi à Rodrigues.  \nMadame la présidente, en ce qui concernant le point (b) de la question, je tiens à informer \nl’Assemblée que, s’agissant des énergies renouvelables, l’Assemblée Régionale de Rodrigues \n(ARR) a collaboré avec mon ministère, le CEB, MARENA et EEMO à l’élaboration de la feuille \n\n41 \n \nde route Rodrigues Île Verte. Dans le cadre de la mise en œuvre de cette feuille de route, j’ai été \ninformé que le CEB, avec le soutien financier d’organismes de financement internationaux, a \nachevé l’installation de quelque 260 kits photovoltaïques, représentant une puissance produite de \n382 kW. \nEn outre, le CEB a fourni une assistance technique à la RRA pour la mise en place de deux \nmini-fermes solaires à Rodrigues. J’ai été voir ces mini fermes. Donc – \ni    \nune Mini centrale solaire de 100 kW au village de Rivière Coco, et \nii. \nune Mini-centrale solaire de 100 kW au village de Terre Rouge. \nLes deux centrales photovoltaïques sont exploitées et entretenues par le CEB dans le cadre \ndes accords de raccordement conclus avec l’Assemblée régionale. \nMadam Speaker: Ms Collet, are you okay? \nNext question, hon. First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart, Dr. Prayag.  \nNLTA – ISLAND-WIDE SURVEY – TAXI-BASED OPERATIONS AT HOTELS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/979",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 979,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/979) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton &  Rivière du Rempart) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to hotels in Mauritius opting not to have a specified \nbase of operation for taxi services, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National \nLand Transport Authority, information as to whether a survey has been carried out on the \nalternative means of transport to which the said hotels are resorting to and of the impact thereof \non the local taxi owners.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the NLTA that an island wide \nsurvey was carried out in 2022 in hotels in order to assess the adequacy of existing taxi licence \nservices where licences have been already granted and also the need for taxis at hotels where \nlicences have not yet been granted. According to that survey, 1079 taxis have been licensed to \noperate from 67 hotels while 23 hotels do not have taxis specifically licensed thereat.  \nMadam Speaker, I am given to understand that some of these hotels opted not to have taxis \nlicensed for their hotels on the premises of limited space near their compounds to accommodate \ntaxis or allegedly as they perceive that there was a lack of need for taxi services. Taxi drivers were \ntherefore deprived of a source of income.  \n\n42 \n \nIn spite of that perception, it would appear that these hotels are availing, on the other hand, \nof alternative mode of transport means such as contract cars, contract buses and outside based taxis \nto meet the daily needs of their clients for transfer services and excursions.  \nTransport is an important support service to the tourist industry, and no hotel management \ncan possibly claim that there is no need for taxis at their hotel space.  \nThe underlying reason for not showing interest in having taxi license for their hotels is an \neasy guess. All-inclusive packages are an important aspect of marketing strategy in the tourism \nsector. Destination management companies and inbound tourist operators resort to that strategy \nand transfers as well as excursions are included as part of their holiday package offers.  \nIt is, therefore, perceived that taxis do no fit in those formulas, thereby leading to some sort \nof vertical integration of the system that many stakeholders have been complaining about over \nmany years. I have spoken to my colleague, the hon. Minister of Tourism, hon. Richard Duval, and \nhe told me that he will into the matter.  \nMadam Speaker, the number of tourists visiting our island is on the rise. Over one million \ntourists’ arrival have been recorded between January and September this year, and the tourist peak \nperiod is yet to come. Against this backdrop, my Ministry has requested the NLTA to carry out a \nfresh survey of the 23 hotels sites I referred to earlier for the purpose of determining the need to \nissue taxi licenses at these hotels.  \nThe NLTA has also been instructed in case where lack of space on hotel premises is put \nforward as an argument for not having specifically licensed taxis to consider the availability of \nalternative sites outside the hotels concerned for use as taxi stand is already common at many \nhotels. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister.  \nNext question to Dr. Ms Thannoo, the Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 8 – ENHANCING WATER SUPPLY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/980",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 980,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/980) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) asked \nthe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to water supply for domestic \npurposes in villages of Constituency No. 8, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \n\n43 \n \nCentral Water Authority, information as to whether water is currently being drawn from Valetta \nLake to ensure improved water supply and adequate pressure thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, je remercie l’honorable députée pour sa question et \nsa proposition d’amélioration de l’approvisionnement en eau de la circonscription numéro 8. J’ai, \nd’ailleurs, Madame la présidente, présidé une réunion avec les députés de la circonscription, le \nporte-parole des habitants et les représentants de la CWA, le 21 octobre, au cours de laquelle nous \navons discuté de certains points précis. \nConcernant le lac de Valetta, la CWA m’informe que cette source d’eau avait été identifiée \ncomme source d’approvisionnement supplémentaire dans la région. Dans ce contexte, une étude \nde faisabilité a été menée au cours de laquelle des échantillons d’eau brute ont été analysés par le \nlaboratoire de la qualité de l’eau de la CWA le 06 novembre 2025.  \nMadame la présidente, malheureusement, les résultats de l’analyse ont indiqué que même \naprès filtration et traitement, la coloration et la présence de micro-organismes dans l’eau brute \ndépassaient largement les limites acceptables. \nDe plus, les résultats des analyses chimiques et biologiques n’ont pas été concluants. Il a \ndonc été conclu que le lac de Valetta n’est pas adapté à l’approvisionnement en eau potable et \naucun projet n’a été entrepris à cet égard. Madame la présidente, il convient d’ajouter que la \nCentral Water Authority prélève déjà l’eau de la rivière Valetta située en amont du lac de Valetta. \nUn filtre de pression CPF d’une capacité de 1500 m³ par jour a été installé. \nComme je l’ai indiqué dans ma réponse au PQ B/880 de l’honorable membre, des sites \npotentiels pour le forage des puits ont été identifiés à Dagotière, L’Espérance, Quartier Militaire et \nAlma pour augmenter la production d’eau dans ces régions. Une étude géophysique sera réalisée \nen premier lieu. Merci. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, vous êtes satisfaite? \nDr. Ms Thannoo: I have one more supplementary. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nDr. Ms Thannoo: May I kindly request that we have water at least four hours per day at \nadequate pressure to ensure that we uphold the access to water as a human right? Thank you. \n\n44 \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, Monsieur le ministre! \nMr Assirvaden: Oui, je partage l’avis de l’honorable membre. Je dois expliquer aux \nmembres de l’Assemblée nationale quel est le souci que nous avons en ce qui concerne l’heure à \nlaquelle on donne de l’eau et la pression. Vous savez, nous avons des tuyaux, des pipelines à l’île \nMaurice qui datent de plus de 50 ans. Ce sont des tuyaux qui sont en amiante, et qui sont remplis \nde fuites. Des vieux tuyaux ! \nCeci dit, bien souvent, je reçois pas mal de questions des membres de l’Assemblée nationale \nconcernant la pression. Il faut augmenter la pression pour que certaines personnes puissent avoir \nde l’eau. Notre problème à nous, c’est que quand je demande à la CWA d’essayer de voir comment \non peut augmenter la pression, les tuyaux éclatent parce que ce sont des vieux tuyaux. Il nous faut \ncommencer peut-être par là : changer des tuyaux. Malheureusement, 700 millions ont été utilisés \ndans le temps pour changer les tuyaux, mais absolument rien n’a été fait ! Ceci dit, si nous fermons \nla pression – que je peux comprendre –, nous baissons la pression pour éviter les fuites un peu \npartout dans le pays, certaines personnes en hauteur ne vont pas recevoir l’eau.  \nNous donnons l’eau par gravité. Nous attendons que les réservoirs de services se remplissent \npour pouvoir alimenter la région. Quand nous alimentons la région, ceux qui sont le plus proche \nde nos réservoirs reçoivent l’eau, mais ceux qui sont en hauteur – comme nous avons longuement \ndiscuté de cela pour la circonscription no. 8, et cela s’applique un peu partout –, c’est que ceux qui \nsont un peu plus retirés, un peu plus loin, ceux qui habitent un peu en hauteur, ils sont dans la \ndifficulté. \nDonc, voilà, un peu notre souci à nous. Merci, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Merci beaucoup, Monsieur le ministre. \nHon. Beechook! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 9 – SOCIAL HOUSING UNITS CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/981",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 981,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/981) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the social housing units under construction \nin Constituency No. 9, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Housing \nDevelopment Company Ltd., and the New Social Living Development Ltd., information as to \n\n45 \n \nwhere matters stand, indicating the expected completion dates and delivery to the beneficiaries \nthereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I am informed that the construction of 507 \nsocial housing units is currently being undertaken in Constituency No. 9. The NHDC is \nconstructing 45 housing at Quatre Cocos and 72 housing units at Camp Ithier. The project, \nincluding onsite and offsite works at Quatre Cocos, is expected to be completed by the end of this \nyear while the project at Camp Ithier would be completed in January 2026. \n  Conversely, the NSLD is constructing 178 housing units at Camp Ithier and 212 housing \nunits at Quatre Cocos. The expected completion dates are 30 November 2025 and 31 July 2026. \nHowever, … \nMadam Speaker: Take your breath. Take your breath! \nMr Mohamed: It is a private matter that we shared with the DPM.  \nHowever, the offsite works at Camp Ithier comprising mainly road and drain works would \nbe completed in January 2026 while offsite drain works at Quatre Coco are expected to be \ncompleted in December 2026. I would like to add here, with regard to this date of December 2026, \nthat the NSLD had asked that geotechnical investigations be carried out at Quatre Cocos by Water \nResearch Co Ltd in July 2022 in order to determine its suitability for construction prior to \nacquisition of the plot of land. \nCore holes, undertaken at depths of 7 metres to 15 metres, did not indicate the presence of \ncavities. The project management consultant, a company called Vyyaass Consulting Engineer Ltd \nconfirmed the suitability of the site for the construction of housing units through a letter dated 18 \nNovember 2022. I just wanted to explain this is how they worked.  \nHowever, the project is encountering serious delays due to the presence of extensive cavities \nthat certain people thought did not exist! Even though there were geotechnical reports and the \nreports said there were no cavities, cavities exist bel et bien! So, depending on the outcome of the \ninvestigations now and the redesigning of the masterplan – a redesign may be required –, \nconstruction of all housing units and associated onsite infrastructure, including offsite drainage \nworks, which are essential to render the site flood resilient, I expect it to be completed, as I said, \non 31 December 2026. \n\n46 \n \nSo, Madam Speaker, I hope that the hon. Member does realise that we are here to correct the \nmess of the previous government. And literally, when we say they put us in a hole, cavities are \nthere! Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Monsieur Beechook, ça va?  \nMaybe we can do one more question before lunch. Hon. Third Member for Port Louis North, \nhon. Caserne! \nVALLÉE DES PRÊTRES – MORCELLEMENT RAMLAGUN – FLOOD MITIGATION \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/982",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 982,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/982) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne Longue) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to flood mitigation measures \nwithin the region of Vallée des Prêtres, particularly in Morcellement Ramlagun, including the \nplacing of rock bunds at critical locations as per the report issued on 16 September 2025, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Land Drainage Authority, information as to where \nmatters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the Land Drainage Authority entrusted \nthis project to the Drain Infrastructure Construction Ltd on 06 January 2025 for implementation. \nThe proposed project was initially designed by NDU’s consultant, Benchmark Consulting \nEngineers Ltd. A sum of Rs120 million has been earmarked under the previous National Flood \nManagement Programme. Tenders were thereafter launched by the DICL on 21 February 2025 for \nthe construction of flood wall and rock revetment at Morcellement Ramlagun, Vallée des Prêtres. \nHowever, the bidding exercise proved unsuccessful as the bids received were not responsive.  \nMadam Speaker, in parallel, based on the recommendation of the project consultant and in \norder to provide the necessary technical foundation for the project, DICL awarded a contract for a \ngeotechnical investigation of the region. The geotechnical investigation was completed in May \n2025 following which it was reviewed by the supervising consultant Luxconsult (Mtius) Ltd. \nMadam Speaker, based on the advice of the consultant, the DICL is now pursuing the project in a \nphased manner. \n\n47 \n \nThe first phase will consist of the construction of the reinforced concrete flood wall along \nthe residential boundary of Morcellement Ramlagun instead of the simultaneous construction of \nboth the flood wall and the rock revetment as originally envisaged. \nThe revised design and cost estimates are expected to be finalised in one month. The DICL \nwill then submit the updated project proposal for financial clearance. Bid is expected to be \nlaunched by December 2025. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that that the DCL has also embarked on the \nprocedures for land acquisition required for the project. 19 plots of land are concerned of which \n18 belong to private owners and one is State land. \nTodate, 12 private landowners have already conveyed their agreement and them memoranda \nof survey are being prepared. Discussions are ongoing with the seven land owners to secure their \nconsent. \nMadam Speaker, regarding the issue of rock bunds, I wish to inform the House that this \nproposal has recently been put forward by the Land Drainage Authority in a letter dated 16 \nSeptember 2025 as a palliative measure pending the construction of the flood walls. \nThis proposal was not part of the original project design and no detailed drawings or designed \nparameters are yet available. I am informed that properly engineered rock bunds entail significant \ntime and financial implications. As such this proposal is being examined for possible integration \nin the permanent works to be implemented by the DICL. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that on 01 September 2025, the LDA has \nrecommended to the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Centre to formulate an \nevacuation plan, prepare safety protocols and consider the relocation of two houses situated within \nthe flood plain in case of force majeure. \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed that the Municipal City Council of Port Louis awarded \na contract on 10 June 2025 for the cleaning and desilting of River Latanier over a stretch of some \n8.7 kilometres extending from upper Vallée des Prêtres near Ally Lane to its outlet at Roche Bois. \nThese works which included the region of Morcellement Ramlagun were undertaken \nbetween 02 July and 15 September 2025 and have already been completed. \n\n48 \n \nMadam Speaker, I wish to reassure the hon. Member and the House that government remains \nfully committed to addressing the flooding risk at Morcellement Ramlagun. While immediate \nrelief has already been provided for the cleaning and desilting works undertaken by the Municipal \nCouncil, the permanent solution is being actively pursued through DICL with the close support of \nthe National Development Unit, Minister of Finance and the Land Drainage Authority. \nMadam Speaker: Are you happy hon. L. Caserne? Yes. We will do a last question, Hon. \nDr. Prayag, please. There is one which has been withdrawn. \nCORAL BLEACHING – IMPACT – DOMESTIC ECONOMY, FISHING & \nTOURISM SECTORS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/983",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 983,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/983) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nEnvironment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in regard to coral bleaching \nin the Republic of Mauritius, he will give details of coral bleaching events and state the – \n(a) \nactions and marine breakthroughs, if any, addressing same, and \n(b) \nassessment, if any, of the impact thereof on the domestic economy, namely, the fishing \nand tourism sectors.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nNORTHERN REGION – WATER SUPPLY – WATER TANKER TRUCKS – WATER \nPIPES LAYING PROJECT – COST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/984",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 984,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/984) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked the \nMinister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the Northern part of the country, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to the \nnumber of water tanker trucks serving same during the prevailing water shortage periods, \nindicating the expected date of connection and coming into operation of already laid water pipes \nextending from the Grande Retraite Water Pumping Station and the Plaines des Roches Reservoir, \nindicating the costs incurred as at to date. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister! \n\n49",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Je pensais qu’on allait déjeuner et après j’allais rependre mais, comme vous \nvoulez. \nMadam Speaker : Mais non, nous prenons de l’eau avant de déjeuner. \nMr Assirvaden: Oui, ok, on prendra un verre d’eau. Madame la présidente, la CWA \nm’informe que 6 camions-citernes sont normalement affectés à la zone d’approvisionnement en \neau au nord afin d’assurer la distribution quotidienne et régulière. \nCette distribution concerne notamment les établissements scolaires, la santé, les autres \ninfrastructures publiques et les traitements des plaintes reçues via la ligne d’assistance \ntéléphonique de la CWA. \nLorsque la CWA entreprend d’important travail de réparation surtout comme cela s’est passé \ndans le nord, dans une région donnée susceptible de perturber l’approvisionnement en eau, des \ncamions-citernes supplémentaires sont déployés depuis d’autres zones. \nDe plus pendant la saison de stress, la CWA fait appel à des compagnies de transport d’eau \nprivé pour compléter sa propre flotte répondre aux demandes des usagers. \nMadame la présidente, j’étais informé que la CWA avait mis en service un forage \nsupplémentaire à la station de pompage de Petite Retraite et poser une conduite, un tuyau pour \nalimenter les parties supplémentaires d’Amaury et le réservoir de la Plaine des Roches. \nActuellement ce forage fonctionne grâce à un groupe électrogène, générateur tandis que la \nsalle de transformateur existante est en cours de rénovation par la CWA afin d’augmenter la \ncapacité électrique nécessaire à un fonctionnement continu 24/24 heures. \nSuite au renouvellement dans la région d’Amaury, l’année dernière ce forage désormais \nexclusivement dédié à l’alimentation du réservoir de la Plaine des Roches. De plus, afin de \nminimiser les pertes d’eau et d’améliorer la fiabilité de l’approvisionnement en eau, la CWA a \nentrepris le remplacement de l’ancien pipeline en fonte ductile de 250 mm par un pipeline PEHD \nentre la station de pompage de Petite Retraite et les réservoirs de Plaine des Roches sur une \ndistance de 3km. \nL’Assemblée pourrait souhaiter noter que le tuyau posé en surface – vous l’avez vu je \nsuppose un peu partout – les tuyaux posés en surface par l’ancienne direction de la CWA et par \nl’ancien Directeur Général, Prakash Maunthrooa – 23 millions, le hon. Premier Ministre avait dit, \n\n50 \n \nje crois 23 millions pour quelques années. Malheureusement ces tuyaux, il faut bien le dire, ne \nsont pas fournis localement aux raccords. Les pièces ne sont pas fournies en raccord. On ne peut \npas avoir sur le marché local ; il nous faudra importer. Pour mener à bien les travaux, il sera \nnécessaire d’obtenir l’autorisation de passage de de la RDA, des autorités locales, des propriétaires \nfonciers privés. La fin des travaux est prévue pour mars de l’année prochaine 2026. \nMadame la présidente, La CWA m’informe que le coût total encouru à ce jour pour les \ntravaux de pose de tuyaux s’élève à seulement R 10,5 millions. Vous savez pourquoi c’est R 10,5 \nmillions ? On a coupé un projet de R 700 millions en des petits projets de R 10 millions pour \npouvoir donner des contrats aux copains et copines aussi simple que ça. C’est pour cela ! Et parmi \nil y a le fameux Dewdanee, effectivement – R 10,5 millions représentant à l’acquisition des tuyaux \net des raccords et des travaux de forges de transport des tuyaux. Merci, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker : Yes, hon. Dr. Prayag ! \n Dr. Prayag: Thank you, hon. Minister. Meanwhile, we understand that we have only 9 \ntrucks that are serving water in the North. Meanwhile, given that these trucks serve water to \nschools, public infrastructures and health infrastructures, can we have them to serve household \nalso during the day instead of only in the evenings as it is the case actually? \nMadam Speaker: Short and sweet hon. Minister. \nMr Assirvaden : Allez d’accord. Je dois rassurer l’honorable membre que nous avons lancé \nun appel d’offres pour recruter des compagnies privées. Donc, nous avons neuf compagnies \nprivées pour fournir les camions-citernes donc cela sera fait d’ici la semaine prochaine et nous \nallons allouer trois à quatre camions-citernes pour desservir la région du Nord expressément. Merci \nMadam Speaker: Thank you everybody, we are now going to raise for lunch. One and a \nhalf hour, we are back at 2.30 p.m. Thank you. \nAt 13.02 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.34 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated! Yes, hon. Fourth Member for Port Louis North and \nMontagne Longue! \nMr A. Duval: B/986. \n\n51 \n \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Babajee had already spoken. You want… \n(Interruptions) \nMr Babajee: No! \nMadam Speaker: Oh, no? Okay! I am so sorry, hon. Babajee. Normally I should see you. \nOkay, please go ahead! \nDOLPHIN & WHALE WATCHING – PLEASURE CRAFT OWNERS – PROTECTIVE \nMEASURES – REGULATORY FRAMEWORK",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/985",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 985,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. B/985) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Tourism whether, in regard to issues being raised regarding dolphin and whale \nwatching, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe measures being envisaged for the protection of the – \n(i) \nsea animals, and  \n(ii) \npleasure craft owners making their living out of the said activities and  \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given to making of these activities a new pillar of the \ntourism industry and establishing the relevant regulatory framework therefor.",
      "answer": "Mr R. Duval: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Dolphin and whale watching are regulated by \nthe Tourism Authority (Dolphin and Whale Watching) Regulations which was promulgated in \n2012 to ensure that – \n(a) \nsuch activities take place in responsible, orderly and sustainable manner; \n(b) \nthe safety of all persons involved in the activity is not jeopardised at any moment; \n(c) \nthe sea animals are adequately protected, especially when persons enter the sea to swim \nwith dolphins. \nAnd in a nutshell, Madam Speaker, the 2012 regulations make it mandatory for – \n(a) \nan operator to hold a licence from the Tourism Authority to undertake dolphin and \nwhale watching or dolphin and whale watching together with swimming with \ndolphins; \n\n52 \n \n(b) \ndolphin and whale watching is to be allowed only in prohibited zones which should be \nwithin a radius of 50 metres and 100 metres respectively from the pleasure craft \nundertaking that activity, and \n(c) \ndolphin and whale watching to take place only in a regulated zone with a radius of 50 \nto 150 metres from the closest dolphin and a radius of 100 metres to 200 metres from \nthe closest whale. \nIt is to be noted that currently dolphin and whale watching or dolphin and whale watching together \nwith swimming with dolphins is being carried out by 278 pleasure crafts on the western coast of \nthe island. \nMadam Speaker, contrary to what is provided in the 2012 regulations, the Tourism Authority \nhas never issued any of these 278 pleasure crafts with a licence to carry out dolphin and whale \nwatching or dolphin and whale watching together with swimming with dolphins. These pleasure \ncrafts have been conducting these activities with a licence of excursion, the reason being that the \n2012 regulations, though duly promulgated, could not be enforced following the representations \nreceived from the Federation of Pleasure Crafts Operators (FOPCO) on ground that – \n(a) \nno insurance cover could be taken for swimming with dolphins as same is not provided \nby the Association of Insurers, and \n(b) \nequipment such as propeller guard was not available on the local market. \nOn the other hand, the cost of oxygen kit was too high. To note that propeller guards are \ninstalled on pleasure crafts to reduce injury to marine animals. The National Coast Guard, on its \npart, informed that enforcement of the regulations could not be made as their own vessels were \nfitted with a propeller guard and they did not have the appropriate equipment to ascertain distance \nin the prohibited and regulated zones. \nMadam Speaker, in view of these inabilities to enforce the regulations, several complaints \nhave been received concerning the harassment of sea animals during the activity. Abuses have also \nbeen reported on the social medias about the disorganised and dangerous manner operators carry \nout this activity. It is understood that some operators even offer swimming with whales against \nhigh, expensive packages, which is illegal as per section 8(1)(b) of the regulations and other \nconducts, risky manoeuvres with clients at sea, resulting in harassment and safety concerns of \nthose mammals.  \n\n53 \n \nIn view of the above, Madam Speaker, when the Government took power, an interministerial \ncommittee under the chair of the Deputy Prime Minister, was set to look into and remedy these \nmatters. I must say that the committee includes among others, representatives of the Ministry of \nEnvironment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change, the Ministry of Blue Economy, \nMarine Resources, Fisheries and Shipping and the National Coast Guard. In the following \ndiscussions held, it was agreed that a fresh Tourism Authority (Dolphin and Whale Watching) and \nSwimming with Dolphins Regulations be worked out only to prohibit abuses in such activities \nwhich constitute a new pillar of our tourism industry. \nMadam Speaker, a first draft of the Regulations has been worked out by my Ministry and it \nprovides among others, for a pleasure craft conducting this activity – it is mandatory to – \n(a) \npossess a licence from the Tourism Authority for that purpose; \n(b) \nbe equipped with propeller guard; \n(c) \nhave a lookout and certified lifesaver onboard, and \n(d) \nbe manned by duly trained skippers. \nMadam Speaker, the draft regulations have been submitted to all concerned stakeholders for \nvalidation prior to being promulgated. On the other hand, Non-Governmental Organisations \n(NGOs) for instance, Eco-Sud, Marine Megafauna Conservation Organisation (MMCO) have \ninformed that they have no objections to dolphin and whale watching activities and request that \nswimming with dolphins be banned. The FOPCO on the other hand, asked for dolphin and whale \nwatching together with swimming with dolphins be maintained with reduced regulatory \nconstraints, for example, the requirement of lifesaver and propeller guard be removed. \nMr R. Duval: Madam Speaker, with a view to striking the right balance between the \nprotection of the sea animals and our marine ecosystem, and the fact that the livelihood of the 278 \noperators and their personnel is concerned, I have called a meeting this Thursday with the \nconcerned party to reach a modus operandi. Once same is agreed upon, the proposed regulation \nwill be finalised. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Now, hon. Fourth Member for Port Louis \nNorth! \n \n \n\n54 \n \nGRADE 7-9 TEXTBOOKS – ACADEMIC YEAR 2026 – PROCUREMENT EXERCISE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/986",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 986,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/986) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne Longue) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the procurement \nexercise for the provision of textbooks to secondary students for pupils’ core subjects in Grades 7 \nto 9 for Academic Year 2026, he will state – \n(a) \nwhether he will table copy of the bid document, indicating the conditions relating to \ndelivery time and any requirement for the submission of maquettes for the prior \napproval of the Ministry;  \n(b) \nthe number of responsive bidders, and  \n(c) \nthe conditions of the contract awarded, name of the successful bidder, contract price, \ndelivery time and specifications of the maquettes, if any.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, at the very outset, let me inform the House that our \nstudents of Grade 1 to Grade 9 have unjustly suffered a lot year in and year out because they used \nto receive a few of their prescribed textbooks very late during the academic year. Sometimes, even \nduring the second semester.  \nWhen I assumed office as Minister, I looked into the main causes of this tardy supply of \nthese textbooks by selected bidders in order to remedy the problem. I found that there were only \ntwo main local printers who were monopolising the printing of these textbooks. The main reason \nwhy these two were able to do so was simply because the specification for the inside papers being \n90 grams matt for procuring these textbooks. \nEarlier during this year, I openly denounced such obscure practices which were blatantly \nencouraged by the previous regime. Who were the main victims? Our helpless kids. They suffered \nunjustly as they were denied timely delivery of their textbooks. With a view to addressing this \nissue, more printers are henceforth encouraged to participate in the textbook bidding exercises. \nHenceforth, my Ministry, in consultation with the MIE, revised the paper requirement from 90 \ngrams to minimum 80 grams matt. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I tabling a copy of the bidding document for the \nparticular procurement exercise. Bids were launched by my Ministry on 19 June 2025 through \nopen national bidding for the provision of textbooks to secondary schools, mainstream students \nand educators, in respect of Grade 7 to 9 for Academic Year 2026.  \n\n55 \n \nI am informed that according to the bidding document, the delivery time for textbooks shall \nbe within 60 days as from the date of issue of letter of acceptance. Moreover, the successful bidders \nare required to provide a maquette of the textbook to the MIE to ensure that same meets the \nrequirements and specifications of my Ministry. \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that there were technically four responsive \nbidders.  \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (c) of the question, I am tabling the list of bidders \ntogether with the corresponding contract prices for each lot. I am informed that all the conditions \nmentioned in the bidding document have been fully adhered to, except for the delivery period and \nits strike off process prior to bulk printing in relation to Lot 4. Notwithstanding the \nrecommendations of the Bid Evaluation Committee and Departmental Bid Committee, the Senior \nChief Executive of my Ministry provided an extension in delivery period of around two weeks for \nLot 4. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the Procurement Section of my Ministry that all bidders \nwho have been awarded contract for printing of textbooks for both primary and secondary have \nuntil the end of November 2025, at latest, to deliver their respective lots of textbooks. Except \nunforeseen circumstances beyond my Ministry’s control, all textbooks are expected, hopefully, to \nbe distributed to all schools on time prior to the start of the Academic Year 2026 so that our \nstudents can resume their studies in all serenity. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes! \nMr A. Duval: Can I ask the Minister – we are talking about millions of rupees of \nprocurement of textbooks – is it normal that, with respect to Lot 4 as stated by the Minister, a \ncontract has been awarded whilst two critical conditions as per the bidding document, that is, the \ndelivery time and the prior submission of a maquette to ensure quality, have been forgone? Who \nhas taken the decision, therefore, to forgo these two critical conditions contrary to the bidding \ndocument? \nDr. Gungapersad: I said it in the main answer. But definitely, as you are mentioning, I think \nan investigation will take place in that sense. \n\n56 \n \nMr A. Duval: May I ask the Minister about – I am sure he has received it as well – an \nanonymous letter that alleged that there have been meetings prior to the award of the contract for \nLot 4 between the Senior Chief Executive of his Ministry and a non-responsive bidder at the time? \nThere have been allegedly modifications made to the Minutes, and provisos have been added and \nBackdated. Following that meeting, an award was given in respect of which, again, conditions \nwhich were critical to the bidding document have been forgone? In light of this, is the Minister \nnow going… \nMr Mohamed: Excuse me, on a point of order. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, this is an anonymous letter. \nMr Mohamed: On a point of order. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Mohamed: Whenever a Member of Parliament makes such accusations, he must come \nand back it up. Very often, I see that they have a loose tongue whereby they can pronounce \nwhatever they want, slur anyone, throw in accusations, but they have nothing to back it up. I am \nsaying that I am taking a point of order because unless and until this Member can back up what he \nis saying – not his word – with a document or someone who said so, then he can come. Otherwise, \nhe should… \nMadam Speaker: Let me reply. \nMr Etwareea: This is not the first time! \nMadam Speaker: You have put your point of order. \nMr A. Duval: And I would be… \nMr Mohamed: This is too much! \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Member… \nMr A. Duval: I would be more than happy to table the said letter. \nMadam Speaker: No, no, no. \nMr A. Duval: I will. I undertake to do so by… \n(Interruptions) \n\n57 \n \nAn hon. Member: Now! \nMr A. Duval: I undertake to do so. I do not have it with me now. If you give me 10 minutes, \nI will table it. But the question remains… \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Member, you did not let me deal with the point of order! First of \nall, the Minister raised a point of order. Secondly, I did not have the time. By the time you said it, \nI had started talking. You said anonymous letter. So, even if you table it, it is an anonymous letter. \nAn hon. Member: Sa aussi li pa kone! \nMr A. Duval: Right! Let me rephrase my question. But it is to be noted that whistleblowing \nis encouraged in the House. \nMr Mohamed: Madam Speaker, on another point of order. \nMadam Speaker: You cannot both stand up! Sit down! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Sit down! \nMr A. Duval: And there is no… \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Sit down! \nAn hon. Member: Assize do! \nMr Mohamed: I have another point of order. \nMadam Speaker: He is raising… \nAn hon. Member: Assize do! \nMr A. Duval: He has… I am being interrupted. It is my time… \n(Interruptions) \nHe should say with relevance to which point of order in the Standing Orders. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Asize! \nMr Mohamed: I am telling you. Sit down! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Asize! \nMadam Speaker: He is raising… \n\n58 \n \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Ale do sovaz! \nMr Mohamed: Madam Speaker, I take note that he is not insisting on the question. However, \nwhile he was putting his question… \nMr A. Duval: I will rephrase. \nMr Mohamed: …he is rephrasing it –, he made some serious averments that he should \nwithdraw first and then continue. \nAn hon. Member: Withdraw! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, may I? \nMadam Speaker: Okay, yes, but do not… \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, let me ask the question differently. Is the Minister… \nHon. Members: Withdraw! Withdraw! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: But under which Standing Order?  \nHon. Members: Withdraw!  \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, under which Standing Order has hon. Shakeel Mohamed \nraised a point of order? Which Standing Order? He is simply making a speech! I am asking a \nquestion. He has made a point. I will rephrase. Can I ask my question now? \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: First of all, … \nMr A. Duval: Can I ask my question? \nMadam Speaker: But you do not let me reply! If nobody will let me talk, we will sit here \nand wait! \n(Interruptions) \nIt is so obvious, even… \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Li pa mem konn fer so travay! \n\n59 \n \nMr A. Duval: Ki mo pa… \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister, please! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: …li onte pou… \nMr A. Duval: Vinn asiz-la, montre mwa fer travay-la! \nAn hon. Member: Li pa kone! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: May I say a word? The thing is that I am sweet Speaker; I am not loud \nSpeaker! Before you finished, I tried to stop you because I noted that you said anonymous letter, \nand I knew that it was wrong. But you do not let me speak! So, now, I am asking you to withdraw \nwhatever you said based on that anonymous letter, then, I will let you put other questions. Please! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, the question was: has he received an anonymous letter? \nHon. Members: Withdraw! Withdraw avan! \nMr A. Duval: That was the question. \nHon. Members: Withdraw! \nMadam Speaker: Withdraw it because it is anonymous! \nMr A. Duval: Withdraw what, Madam Speaker? What? \nMadam Speaker: Everything that was in that anonymous letter! \nMr A. Duval: I will rephrase it. And therefore, I am changing the question. \n(Interruptions) \nThe question is simply: has the Minister received an anonymous letter making allegations against \nhis Senior Chief Executive in the award of the contract to a non-responsive bidder… \nMadam Speaker: One moment, everybody! One moment! \nMr A. Duval: …who did not comply with the conditions of the contract? It is a question; he \nwill tell me! \n\n60 \n \nMadam Speaker: First of all, you withdraw everything that you said that was in that letter. \nFirst, you withdraw, and then I will allow that question, okay? \nMr Gunness: Lerla to poz to kestion! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, I cannot withdraw the fact that there is anonymous letter \nwhich raises allegations. \nMadam Speaker: No, you are not listening to me. We are both members of the Bar. You \nknow what I am saying.  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Sa! \nMadam Speaker: You have already said, now you have another question… \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Enn lot kalite bar! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: … which may be is different. Withdraw the first part! \nMr A. Duval: In the interest of my question being put, I will withdraw and rephrase it \ndifferently. I will ask it again. Has the hon. Minister received a letter or be it anonymous, making \nallegations against impropriety involving the Senior Chief Executive in the procurement of that \ncontract to the non-responsive bidder in respect of the Lot No.4 for the record, is it clear now? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, okay! Hon. Minister! \nDr. Gungapersad: I wish to assure the hon. Member that I sit on the right side of the House \nand on this side, we believe in transparency, in accountability. So, rest assured, whatever has to be \ndone, will be done. No need to worry regarding same. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister, he will not give up until and unless you say whether you \nreceived a letter or not?  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Enfin! \nMadam Speaker: No, we don’t want to know whether you are going to act on anonymous \nletter. \nAn hon. Member: Dir li oui! \nDr. Gungapersad: Yes, and we have already acted as for his reassurance. \n\n61 \n \nMadam Speaker: Very good! Very good! That’s better! \nMr A. Duval: May I ask a last question? \nMadam Speaker: Last question but careful! \nMr A. Duval: Yes! Will the hon. Minister now undertake to come back to the House and to \ninform the House of whatever maybe revealed by any inquiry which he might have initiated \nalready or is about to initiate? \nDr. Gungapersad: I repeat myself again. I am sitting on the right side of the House and we \nadhere to transparency and as in all the cases, we will do the needful. Rest assured! \nMadam Speaker: Okay, you will tell the House in due course! \nNext question! Now, where are we? We have finished with hon. Duval.  \nNow, we are with Mr Apollon, Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien! \nFISHERMAN CARD – PENDING APPLICATIONS – ISSUANCE OF CARDS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/987",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 987,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/987) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to \nthe Fisherman Card, he will state the number of pending applications therefor, indicating when \nsame will be determined and the cards issued.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, hon. Member. Madam Speaker, you see the time. We are \non the right side of history. We are all aware that our lagoons have been over-exploited, Madam \nSpeaker, and depleted over the years. The previous government had gone far against sustainable \nfisheries by issuing a substantial number of Fisherman Cards and many of these applications \nshould not have been considered in the first instance, as some of the fishers who have received \ntheir Fisherman Cards are already engaged in gainful employment.  \nMy Ministry is receiving daily representation to the effect that Fisherman Cards have been \ndistributed in an ad hoc manner, without strict adherence to the prescribed criteria and proper \nverification process. There are currently 2,546 Fisherman Cards, out of which 1,190 Fisherman \nCards were issued between the years 2022 to 2024, alone. And, 709 Fisherman Cards were issued \nin 2024 only. So much so, one week prior to the issue of the writ of elections, that is on the 28 \nSeptember 2024, 416 Fisherman Cards were issued by the previous government. \n\n62 \n \nMadam Speaker, with regard to Fisherman Cards, I wish to inform the House that there is a \ntotal of 1,512 applications which have been made at the level of the Ministry. As regard, whether \nthese 1,512 pending applications would be determined and issued, I must emphasise that utmost \ncare and caution need to be exercised prior to taking a decision. There is a need for a sensitive and \nbalancing exercise to be carried out to ensure the traditional fishermen earn a decent living. We, \nas a committed and responsible government, have a duty to protect the traditional fishers who have \nearned a living out of fishing activities for generations. \nMoreover, we have a moral duty towards our future generation to protect our lagoon and our \nnatural resources. Hence, in order to ensure surveillance of our lagoons and to allow our fish stock \nto rejuvenate, strict control on this issue of Fisherman Card is warranted.  \nMr Apollon: Merci, M. le ministre. Comme nous le savons tous, à la veille des élections de \nnovembre 2024, les Fisherman Cards étaient distribuées sans control et sans respecter les critères \npour l’obtention de ces cartes et maintenant, c’est ce gouvernement qui est en train de mettre de \nl’ordre. Le ministre peut nous dire si l’ordre de faire cet exercice illégal émane des officiers de \nFisheries ou l’ordre venait d’en haut ? Et si c’est le cas, est-ce-que le ministre pense ouvrir une \nenquête approfondie pour faire la lumière sur toute cette affaire ? \nDr. Boolell: I take on board the comments and advice tendered by my good friend. We are \ngoing to put order in the House. But first there is a call for the proper verification exercise which \nis ongoing. Notwithstanding it, if I may state, there are 286 Fisherman Cards, which have not been \nstamped and therefore appropriate and corrective measures will be taken to redress the situation.  \n Madam Speaker: Yes, that’s okay, Mr Apollon! \nYes, Dr. Ms Daureeawo, Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \nPLAISANCE, CAMP LEVIEUX & TRÈFLES – WATER SHORTAGES/CUTS – \nCOMPLAINTS – REMEDIAL ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/988",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 988,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/988) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to Plaisance, Camp Levieux \nand Trèfles, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, \ninformation as to the number of complaints it has received for water shortages/cuts over the past \nsix months, indicating – \n\n63 \n \n(a)  how often same have occurred thereat over the past six months and the reasons \ntherefor;  \n(b)  whether an assessment has been made to rule out losses in the water distribution \nnetwork, and  \n(c)  remedial actions, if any, taken to ensure regular and sufficient water supply thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, la CWA m’informe que les communes de Plaisance, \nCamp Levieux et Trèfles sont actuellement alimentées par le réservoir Stanley. La CWA m’informe \négalement qu’au cours des six derniers mois, 69 réclamations ont été enregistrées pour Plaisance, \n231 pour Camp Levieux et 230 pour Trèfles. Ces réclamations concernent principalement des \ncoupures d’eau, des fuites et des tuyaux rompus.  \nEn ce qui concerne la partie (a) de la question, Madame la présidente, pour Plaisance, le seul \nmois de mai 2025, a enregistré 48 plaintes, soit 70 % du total, ce qui indique un pic inhabituel et \nponctuel de problème de service. À partir de juin, donc le mois juste après mai, le nombre de \nplaintes a chuté de façon spectaculaire et est resté constamment bas avec une moyenne de quatre \nplaintes par mois. En ce qui concerne la région de Camp Levieux, les plaintes mensuelles varient \nde 17 à 58, avec une moyenne d’environ 39 plaintes par mois, indiquant, il faut bien le dire, des \ndifficultés opérationnelles régulières et des contraintes de réseaux. Quant à la région de Trèfles, \nles plaintes mensuelles ont affiché une tendance à la hausse constante, passant de 14 en mai à un \npic de 96 en octobre, donc le mois dernier, 2025. \nMadame la présidente, concernant la partie (b) de la question, la CWA m’informe que le \nréseau de distribution d’environ 6,4 km, desservant ces régions, est constitué de tuyaux en amiante \nciment et de canalisations en polyéthylène, haute tension, communément appelé canalisations \ntuyaux de type bambou. L’évaluation relève que les principales causes de pénurie d’eau sont les \nsuivantes – \n \nquantité d’eau insuffisante pour répondre à la demande dans la région ; \n \ngestion incohérente du fonctionnement des vannes, ceux et celles qui ouvrent les vannes \nsont de façon incohérente ; \n \nrupture de tuyaux de communication, et \n \nfuites isolées au sein du réseau de distribution locale. \n\n64 \n \nLes équipes de la CWA enquête systématiquement sur tous les signalements de coupures, à la \nmesure du possible, afin d’identifier les fuites, les défauts des vannes et les irrégularités de \npressions. \nMadame la présidente, concernant la partie (c) de la question, je suis informé que l’unité des \neaux non-facturées, non-revenue water, de la CWA a été chargé de réaliser un audit détaillé et une \nrevue de conception du réseau existant dans les régions touchées, y compris l’analyse des apports, \nla surveillance des débits nocturnes, de ce que je disais un peu plus tôt ce matin, la pression le soir \net la détection des fuites afin de garantir que les pertes, les cas échéants soient identifiés et corrigés. \nLa CWA met actuellement en œuvre des mesures correctives suivantes – \n \nréparation rapide dans la mesure du possible des fuites détectées ; \n \nréglage des vannes, on a beaucoup de problèmes avec cette affaire de réglage des \nvannes ; \n \ngestion de la pression pour améliorer la régularité du débit ; \n \nrenforcement des équipes d’interventions, des opérations, pour répondre \nrapidement aux incidents ; \n \nen parallèle, la CWA examine la capacité d’approvisionnement dans la région de \nStanley et étudie les options pour augmenter la source notamment le développement \ndes forages supplémentaires dans les mois à venir, et  \n \nune interconnexion possible avec les system adjacents ainsi que la possibilité de \nposer un pipeline.  \nJ’ai posé la question – pourquoi nous avons le réservoir de Bagatelle Dam. Aussi grand que \nsoit-il mais malheureusement, la région de Stanley, de Trèfles continue à subir ce problème d’eaux. \nLà nous avons pris la décision de relier ce Bagatelle Dam avec le Réservoir de Stanley parce que \nc’est Stanley qui alimente la région.  \nDonc, cela va se faire d’ici fin février.  Donc, nous allons prendre toute une connexion sur \nle réservoir de Bagatelle pour alimenter Stanley et Stanley va alimenter la région avoisinante.   \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. You are happy? \nAn hon. Member: Very happy! \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Apollon, yes, one more question.  \n\n65 \n \nMV WAKASHIO – COMPENSATION PAYMENT – STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/989",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 989,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/989) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to \nthe MV Wakashio grounding, he will state where matters stand as to the payment of compensation \nto the victims thereof, including fishermen, businesses and environmental groups, especially, \nfollowing the recent release of the official report of the Mauritian Court of Investigation therein.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, hon. Apollon.  \nMadam Speaker, at the very outset, I wish to inform the House that the previous government \nrefused to make public the report of the Court of Investigation into the grounding of MV Wakashio.  \nAs a responsible government, we could not allow things to linger. Consequently, I had a \nmeeting with my colleagues, the Attorney General, along with the Minister of Foreign Affairs, \nRegional Integration and International Trade, to discuss the way forward and following which, the \ngovernment decided that the report be made public, thus upholding the principle of transparency \nespoused by this government. This is contrary to the stand taken by the former government. \nAccordingly, a communiqué was issued on 02 October 2025, thereby informing the public that the \nreport was now accessible on the website of my Ministry.  \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that following the grounding of MV Wakashio, \ncompensation to the tune of Rs200 million was paid to victims including fishermen and other \nclaimants over the period of 2021 to 2022 by the Japan Protection and Indemnity Club, insurer of \nMV Wakashio.  \nI am tabling the total amount of compensation that was made to the victims. However, \nfollowing the release of the report of the Court of Investigation to the grounding of MV Wakashio, \nno payment of compensation has been effected by the insurer as the ship owner, Okiyo Maritime \nCorporation, has on 25 October 2021 entered a case before the Supreme Court, applying for a \nlimitation fund to be set up limiting the value of compensation to be paid to the tune of \napproximately Rs720 million.  \nThe case of Okiyo Maritime Corporation v the State of Mauritius was heard before the \nSupreme Court on 24 October 2025 and the judgment of the Supreme Court has been reserved.  \n\n66 \n \nMoreover, the Attorney General’s Office is in the process of finalising a mise en demeure \nfor civil action in relation to compensation for all expenses and claims of the Government of \nMauritius against all parties for oil pollution damage.  \nOn the other hand, Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Director of Public Prosecution \nthat the Commissioner of Police has been requested to initiate an inquiry into an alleged act of \nnegligence which may have been committed by officers of National Coast Guard. The \nCommissioner of Police has informed my Ministry that the matter has been referred to the Central \nCriminal Investigation Department and inquiry is ongoing.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Apollon.   \nMr Apollon: Thank you very much. As we know, there are many NGOs and citizens that \nalso initiated legal action. Will the government support these NGOs in the legal action? \nDr. Boolell: Yes, in fact, Dentons has lodged a case on behalf of the NGOs, and we are \nworking very closely with Dentons. We are comparing notes and you can rest assured that we will \nleave no stone unturned in relation to compensation that should be paid to the victims.  \nMr Seeburn: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Would the hon. Minister also state whether, the \nmise en demeure that the Attorney General’s Office is envisaging to serve on the company that \ncaused those damages, would include all the damages that were caused to the shores of Mauritius, \nincluding the parties involved.  \nDr. Boolell: I cannot give an exact reply although this question should have been addressed \nto our good friend, the Attorney General but as I have said, you can rest assured, no stone will be \nleft unturned.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay, next question, please.  \nHon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle, Mr Seeburn.  \nGRAND PORT – STATE-OWNED COASTAL LANDS – PAS GÉOMÉTRIQUES \nLAND – LEGISLATIVE AMENDMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/990",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 990,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/990) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) asked \nthe Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to State-owned coastal lands, including \ninbound Pas Géométriques land, situated within the district of Grand Port, he will state if \n\n67 \n \nGovernment is considering the possibility of introducing amendments to the existing legislation \nwith a view to providing a mechanism for lessees thereof to obtain freehold titles to such leased \nproperties at an agreed and fair market-based price and, if so, indicate the guiding principles, \ncriteria and timeline envisaged for such policy consideration.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Thank you, Madam Speaker.  \nI would like to thank the hon. Member for this very important question which has led to \nsome confusion in the minds not only of the then government, but of the situation between \noccupiers of those particular plots of lands. At one point in time, wrongfully and unlawfully, \ncertain plots of land which were on Pas Géométriques, specifically ex-CHA houses on Pas \nGéométriques and some building site leases on Pas Géométriques, were sold by the government \nof Mauritius in breach of the State Lands Act and the Pas Géométriques Act.  \nAnd, now, we end up with a situation where all those people who lived on Pas Géométriques \nex-CHA and building site leases are, in fact, people who were given those plots of land in moments \nof difficulty, people who socially needed social protection and could not afford a home or had their \nhomes and their abodes destroyed in cyclones, in bad weather and needed government’s support, \nand this is what was done many many years ago.  \nNow what has happened is that through some blunder, part of those plots of land were sold \nand then all of a sudden when they realised that there is now a blunder that has been committed, \nthey said – ‘Okay, hold one, in spite of the fact that we sent letters to all those lessees telling them \nwe could sell; it was taken back.’ \n So, a part of those people now holds leases that are, in fact, not leases because they are in \nviolation of public order and some of their neighbours hold leases and they cannot purchase.  \nSo, being given that at this stage there is no restriction of sale of land in respect of building \nsite leases for residential purposes other than those falling within the Pas Géométriques and taking \ninto account that your question relates specifically to the sale of coastal state land, I am going to \nrespond therefore, following this introduction, as to what action is being taken by my Ministry to \nlook into this problematic situation.  \nSo, we have received many requests from people such as lessees who would like to purchase \nstate lands on Pas Géométriques ex-CHA houses, and unfortunately, they happened to be on Pas \n\n68 \n \nGéométriques. So, in view of the explicit restriction in the law, those requests cannot be entertained \nat this juncture because I simply do not want to repeat blunders of the past.  \nAccordingly, we have sought advice from the Attorney General’s Office as to whether and \nhow those state land on Pas Géométriques could be sold. Clearly, that would require a huge policy \ndecision on the part of my Ministry. \n So, I have responded to such questions under PQ B/38 and B/118 on 04 February and 04 \nMarch, respectively and I reiterate again, this is a complex matter because we have to analyse the \nlegal aspect, the social aspect and the policy implications involved therein.  \nI reiterate that I am very uncomfortable today when I note that you have people who hold \nlease/title deeds that are not even worth the paper it is written on because it has been sold in \nviolation of two specific statutes. What shocks me even more is that those documents were \nregistered as title deeds! So, the blunder started somewhere and continued at different échelons.  \nSo, what I have to do now is deal with two categories of citizens. One gentleman living in \nPointe aux Sables, I recall, came to see me – many Members of Parliament have spoken to me –, \nhe is a sick person. His neighbour’s property has been sold. All be it that the title deed does no \nreally represent much. It has been resold and registered again. God knows how! Now, he wants to \nunderstand why is it that they are given the right to buy whereas he cannot and he is a sick man. \nBefore he departs this world, he would like to transmit something to his children. So, this is \nprecisely the difficult situation we are in.  \nI have the difficult task, together with colleagues of Government, in finding a solution to \nthis. We will find a solution. We will bring justice. Very often, we are called upon to clear and \nclean the mess left by others. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: The hon. First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nGINGER CULTIVATION – IMPORT CHALLENGES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/991",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 991,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/991) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nwhether, in regard to ginger, he will state whether he is in presence of representations from planters \nthereof as to any unfair competition to which they are facing from importers thereof and, if so – \n\n69 \n \n(a) \nindicate the measures his Ministry proposes to take in relation thereto, and \n(b) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Agricultural Marketing Board, \ninformation as to whether consideration could be given for the local production \nthereof to be purchased at a guaranteed price and be given priority on sale.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: The question has been looked into and the hon. Member can rest assured that \nthe matter has been referred to the Police.  \nAs far as ginger is concerned, it is a commodity which depends on market forces. So, let the \nmarket force act. In the meantime, in the light of the request made by the hon. Member, the \nAgricultural Marketing Board will look into it to if there can be a floor price. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nMs Savabaddy: I thank the hon. Minister for this answer. Mais, Monsieur le ministre, les \nplanteurs de gingembre sont confrontés actuellement à une concurrence déloyale des importateurs, \nce qui les met en difficulté financière. Est-ce que le ministre peut examiner ce problème et proposer \ndes solutions pour les soutenir ? Merci. \nDr. Boolell: I have proposed a solution. There is an alternative, notwithstanding that the \nAgricultural Marketing Board can give a floor price. There is a call for proper discussion with our \nplanters. That meeting can easily be organised.  \nIn relation to the illegal activity and in relation to import by certain illegal importers, the \nmatter has been referred to the Police. The matter is being looked into and corrective measures \nwill be taken. Those guilty will have to face the consequences of their illegal act. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nNATIONAL YOUTH COUNCIL – BOARD COMPOSITION, BUDGET & \nACTIVITIES ORGANISED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/992",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 992,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/992) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked the \nMinister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the National Youth Council, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to the – \n(a) \ncomposition of the Board thereof, indicating when it was set up; \n(b) \nbudget allocated thereto and to each Regional Youth Council for financial year 2025–\n2026, and \n\n70 \n \n(c) \ndetailed list of activities organised thereat and related amounts spent since January \n2025 to date in respect of each Regional Youth Council.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, the National Youth Council is a statutory body \nestablished under Section 3 of the National Youth Council Act 1998 with the object inter alia to \ninitiate youth development projects and activities with the aim of encouraging the active \nparticipation of youth in the process of their own empowerment.  \nSection 13 of the Act provides for the setting up of ten Regional Youth Councils in each \ndistrict and in Rodrigues. I wish to point out that projects or activities organised by Regional Youth \nCouncils are funded by the National Youth Council as and when such requests are made. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the House that the \nExecutive Committee of the National Youth Council was last reconstituted in January 2025 in \naccordance with Section 7 of the NYC Act 1998. I am tabling the composition thereof.  \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that as \nsum of Rs77.8 million, which includes the funding of major capital projects related to the \nupgrading of youth hubs, has been allocated to the National Youth Council in financial year 2025-\n2026. I am informed by the National Youth Council that an amount of Rs100,000 has been \nearmarked for each of the ten Regional Youth Councils.  \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (c) of the question, I am informed by the National Youth \nCouncil that for the period January to end of October 2025, nine activities have been organised by \nthe five Regional Youth Council to the tune of Rs167,740. I am tabling a list thereof.  \nMadam Speaker, since the enactment of the National Youth Council Act in 1998, nearly three \ndecades ago, the youth sector in Mauritius has undergone significant and profound transformation, \nincluding the emergence of a new form of youth organisation network, evolving youth needs and \npriorities in areas such as employability, entrepreneurship, development, digital transformation, \nclimate change, mental health and civic participation and an increased need for enhanced \ngovernance, accountability and representation with the youth sector. \nIn light of the above development, the current National Youth Council Act 1998 no longer \nadequately reflects the realities, aspirations and challenges of the youth population in Mauritius. \nCabinet has approved that my Ministry undertakes a complete review of the Act.  \n\n71 \n \nThus, Madam Speaker, my Ministry is undertaking a comprehensive review of the council \nwith a view to better addressing the needs and aspirations of the youth. This includes the present \nfunctioning of the council, its governance structure and operational mechanism.  \nThe objective is to ensure that the National Youth Council evolves into a more dynamic, \nresponsive and effective platform for youth participation and empowerment. \nFurthermore, this review exercise forms part of a broader effort to allow the council’s \nmandate and programme to align with the National Youth Policy and with current national \npriorities. Upon completion of the review, the National Youth Council will roll out a new series of \nyouth-led initiatives, including leadership development, civic engagement, entrepreneurship \nsensitisation and community-based project.  \nMadam Speaker, I must also emphasise that when I took office, the noise surrounding the \nmanagement of the National Youth Council was overwhelmingly negative. \nIn light of many representations, I have requested the Office of Public Sector Governance to \nundertake a full-fledged enquiry. The enquiry is underway and the report is being awaited in the \ncoming months. In light of the outcome of the enquiry, my Ministry will act accordingly. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Questions? \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente, en ce qui concerne la composition du Board du National \nYouth Council, l’honorable ministre peut-il indiquer à la Chambre quels sont les critères retenus \npour la sélection de ses membres et si le processus de nomination est ouvert à des candidatures \npubliques afin d’assurer une représentation équitable de jeunes et des organisations de jeunesse. \nOu est-ce que ce sont des agents politiques qui ont été nommés comme pour le Mauritius Sports \nCouncil et pour la Commission Nationale du Sport féminin ? \nMr Nagalingum: Section 7(3) of the National Youth Council Act 1998 provides that – \n“No person who is – \n(a) \nan office-bearer of a political party; or \n(b) \na member of the assembly or of a local authority, \nShall be eligible to be a member of the Committee.” \n\n72 \n \nSo, if the hon. Member wants to know, no member who forms part in the political party is in \nthat committee. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Quirin: J’ai une question, Madame la présidente.  \nMadam Speaker: Faites attention à ne pas faire ce qui s’est passé tout à l’heure. C’est-à-\ndire dire des choses si vous ne pouvez pas les prouver, okay ? \nMr Quirin: Pourquoi vous mettez en doute ma capacité de prouver ce que je dis ? \nMadam Speaker: Non, je ne mets pas en doute. Je ne mets pas en doute ! Je vous dis de \nfaire un peu attention parce que dans la précédente question… \nMr Quirin: Oui ? \nMadam Speaker: Vous avez déjà évoqué certaines choses. Je ne vous ai pas arrêté. \nMr Quirin: Je ne sais pas où vous voulez en venir, mais… \nMadam Speaker: Allez-y ! Allez-y. J’ai remarqué quand vous avez posé la question. \nMr Quirin: Qu’est-ce que vous avez remarqué ? \nMadam Speaker : Et bien que vous ayez dit dans telle et telle organisation… \nMr Quirin: Oui, c’est le cas. \nMadam Speaker : Et ça, vous pouvez apporter des précisions.  \nMr Quirin : L’honorable ministre est parfaitement au courant, c’est pour cela… \n(Interruptions) \nC’est pour cela qu’il a omit de… qu’il a fait exprès de ne pas donner les noms des personnes \nqu’il a nommées sur le National Youth Council. Mais je n’ai pas insisté. Je n’ai pas insisté malgré \ntout. \nMr Nagalingum: I am saying that I am going to table it. It is a long list; I am tabling the list \nof the committee members. \nMr Quirin: On prend la connaissance. \n\n73 \n \nMadam Speaker: Members, if you will allow me? Earlier on, I wanted to wait for the end \nof questions to come back to what happened. Earlier on, we had an issue between the Member for \nPort Louis North and the hon. Minister raised a point of order. \nI thought it would be wise to remind everybody that we have to look at Standing Order 22 \nin general which says the “Contents of Questions” but I will come specifically because I need time \nto have a look at the Standing Orders in order to give a ruling. So, now I am coming on Section 22 \n(h) which says – \n“a question shall not include the names of persons or statements of facts unless they are \nnecessary to make the question intelligible” and, in the case of statements of facts, can be \nauthenticated by the Member concerned, nor shall it contain charges which the Member \nasking the question is not prepared to substantiate;”  \nThat is, I think, what the hon. Minister was raising this morning. So, I am telling you just to be \ncareful because just before I made that comment, you have started a little bit. I did not want to stop \nyou but now that you do not understand why I was saying that; I was just telling you to be cautious. \nBut just remember, all of you, we have to go by the Standing Orders. This is why you have voted \nfor me to be here. \nMr Quirin : Ma deuxième question, Madame la présidente. L’honorable ministre des Sports \npeut-il confirmer par rapport à la réouverture du Centre de Jeunesse de Trèfles, qu’une somme \nastronomique – j’ai les documents avec moi – de plus de, je vais dire le chiffre exact, R 1 254 000 \nselon un estimated amount. \nEst-ce que l’honorable ministre peut-il confirmer que cette somme a bel et bien été dépensée, \net si oui, en quoi cela est-il justifiable en cette période de ser sintir pour la population ? \nMr Nagalingum: I do not have the answer now. I am going to provide the answer to the \nhon. Member. \nMadam Speaker: You want to give the document?  \nMr Quirin: Yes. \nMadam Speaker: Please, take the document from the Member. Thank you. \nCan we move forward hon. Quirin, or do you have a supplementary question? \n\n74 \n \nMr Quirin: J’ai terminé, merci. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, merci beaucoup. Okay! \nHon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes. \nMETRO EXPRESS LIMITED – ADVERTISING CONTRACT – UPDATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/993",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 993,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/993) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the current advertising contract, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from Metro Express Limited, information as to whether there has \nbeen any update thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I would refer the House to my reply B/417 of the \nhon. Ms. Anquetil at the sitting of Tuesday 06 May 2025 where I stated that an amount of – it is a \nlong figure but I am going to cut it short – Rs34.3 million had been paid to Metro Express Limited \nby Alliance Media since the beginning of the contract on 28 August 2020, that is, over a period of \nfive years almost and this averages to about – again, I am going round up – Rs6.9 million per year. \nI am informed by Metro Express Limited that after my raising serious concerns regarding \nthe contract of MEL and Alliance Media at the level of National Assembly during PQ of hon. Ms. \nAnquetil, and I would like to thank her for that particular question, a further amount of Rs56.8 \nmillion was paid suddenly by the advertising company as part of the advertising revenue stream \nof MEL. No doubt, the reply that I had made had been very beneficial to Metro Express Limited. \nI am further informed that the total amount of Rs91.04 million has been received by MEL to \ndate which comprises of a minimum guaranteed payment of Rs34.3 million for a period up to \nJanuary 2026 and a variable income share of Rs56.7 million for the period up to April 2025. \nFor the period May to July 2025, a further Rs1.6 million will be paid to MEL as income \nshare. The income shares for months of August, September and October 2025 are currently under \nevaluation. The average has therefore moved; it has almost tripled over that period of five years \nand now it is averaged to around Rs18.2 million per year which is important because Metro \nExpress Limited needs that revenue to reduce the yearly deficit. \nMadam Speaker, in view of the anomalies initially observed regarding the contract, a special \naudit is being undertaken to ascertain compliance with procurement and legal procedures and \n\n75 \n \nassess the performance of the contractor. Further action will be taken on the basis of the outcome \nof the special Audit Report. \nIn this respect, I must point out that MEL has recently appointed its park and leisure manager, \nMr B.H, a marketing and communication manager. The latter holds qualification in Events and \nProject Management. As part of the duties, the latter is expected to manage the advertising contract \nto optimise advertising revenue streams of the Metro Express Limited. \nI am made to understand that Mrs B.B, former communication officer at MEL resigned from \nthe company last month. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMs Anquetil:  Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Le ministre peut -il indiqué à la \nChambre que la personne à laquelle il fait référence dans sa réponse a effectivement était élue sous \nbannière MSM lors des élections Municipal à Vacoas en 2015? \nMr Osman Mahomed: I am aware of this. Mrs B.B. was elected by the Alliance Lepep in \n2015. She was subsequently recruited as Public Relations Officer of Larsen & Toubro during the \nconstruction of the Metro line to liaise with people facing difficulties during construction. Then, \nsubsequently, she was recruited as Communication Officer of Metro Express Limited. \nNow, she left the company last month, a decision of her own. There has been no pressure at \nall. Now, the new officer in charge, like I said in my substantive reply, is expected to do a better \njob to monitor the contract of the contractor Alliance Media because we need this revenue to reduce \nthe deficit of the Metro Express Limited. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! Are you okay? \nThe next question is being withdrawn if I am not mistaken. Then we will move on. I am a \nlittle surprised, our friend hon. Jhummun is not here. Hon. Third Member for Port Louis North, \nhon. Caserne! \nSOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS – SUSPENSION – REASONS – SOCIAL & \nECONOMIC IMPACT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/994",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 994,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/994) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in regard \n\n76 \n \nto the suspension of the social media platforms on 01 November 2024 in Mauritius, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain information as to the – \n(a) \nreasons therefor and under whose directives same was carried out, and \n(b) \nestimated economic and social impact thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nENTREPRENEURSHIP AWARENESS PROGRAMMES – SMALL & MEDIUM \nENTERPRISE MAURITIUS LTD – BENEFICIARIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/995",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 995,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives",
      "question": "(No. B/995) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne Longue) \nasked the Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives whether, in regard to the Entrepreneurship \nAwareness Programmes, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from Small and Medium \nEnterprise Mauritius Ltd., information as to the number thereof held since January 2025 to date, \nindicating in each case, the number of beneficiaries who benefitted from facilities therefrom.",
      "answer": "Mr Ameer Meea: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that since I took office in \nNovember 2024, I have initiated consultations with SMEs, SME Association and Federations in \norder to take stock of state of affairs of the business community in Mauritius. \nDuring these discussions, it became obvious to me that our local entrepreneurs were not \naware of the vast potential and benefits accruing to them whenever they register their businesses \nwhether as companies or individuals with my Ministry. Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the \nHouse that any micro, small or medium enterprise registered with my Ministry is provided with \nan SME Registration Certificate free of charge. \nThis certificate is valid for an initial period of five years and is renewable thereafter. \nThroughout its validity, the certificate unlocks various facilities and benefits for the SME which \nfacilitates its operation and business development. For instance, registered SMEs can benefit from \na four-year tax holiday, duty-free facilities on the acquisition of a double cabin utility vehicle, \nloans at concessionary rates from various banking and financial institutions, exemption from land \nconversion tax and expedited processing of building and land use permits amongst others. \nFurthermore, SME Mauritius Ltd, a government-owned private company, falling under the \npurview of my Ministry provides grants to SMEs under various schemes, namely – \n\n77 \n \n \nthe Business Transformation Scheme; \n \nTechnology and Innovation Scheme; \n \nMarket Readiness Scheme; \n \nGreening Support Scheme, and \n \nAgri Business Scheme. \nMadam Speaker, with a view to encouraging aspiring and new SMEs to take full advantage \nof these benefits and thereby work towards realising their growth potential, I took the decision to \nconduct Entrepreneurship Awareness Programmes across the island on a regional basis. During \nthese awareness programmes, my Ministry set up information booths and special desks with \nexperienced officers to provide advice and guidance to attendees in order to enable those who are \nstarting or who have just started operation to be equipped with the knowledge and resources \nregarding the process of setting up a new business and to obtain firsthand information about \nregistration with my Ministry, so as to tap into the various benefits and grant schemes available.  \nMadam Speaker, my Ministry organised the first entrepreneurship awareness programme in \nJanuary 2025 for the region of Port Louis, comprising of constituencies 1, 2, 3 and 4 at the Dr. \nIdrice Goumany Municipal Centre, Plaine Verte, during which some 325 persons benefitted from \nthe programme. The second entrepreneurship awareness programme was held in April 2025 in the \nnorth region, comprising of constituencies 5, 6 and 7 at Plaine des Papayes multipurpose hall and \naround 460 persons benefitted from the programme. A third awareness programme was held in \nJune 2025, in the southern region comprising constituencies 11, 12, 13 and part of 14 at Kuushi \nHall, Plaine Magnien, involving around 450 persons benefitting from the programme. And a fourth \none was held in August 2025 for the central region comprising constituencies 18, 19, and 20 at the \nSalle des fêtes Plaza, Rose Hill where some 350 persons benefitted from the programme. \nMadam Speaker, with around 1,600 aspiring entrepreneurs having benefitted from the \nEntrepreneurship Awareness Programmes, these sensitisation campaigns are already bearing fruit \nand giving new impetus to the entrepreneurial culture in Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to further inform the House that the next Entrepreneurship \nAwareness Programme will be conducted for the eastern region and in Rodrigues, and we expect \nthat over 500 persons will benefit from the programmes. Thank you. \n\n78 \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. No supplementary?  \nANNOUNCEMENT \nPQ B/992 – HON. QUIRIN – UNAUTHENTICATED TABLED DOCUMENT \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Members, give me one minute. I am coming back on the PQ \nB/992 from hon. Quirin. We received a document which hon. Quirin has kindly tabled. \nUnfortunately, I will not be able accept the document because it is just a list of items with estimated \namounts in rupees not purporting to be any document having any connection with paragraph (c) \nof PQ B/992. \n(Interruptions) \nJust a flying document that is not authenticated. So, I am sorry, I cannot accept this document. \n(Interruptions) \nMais, if you get a better document, I will accept, of course. \nMr Quirin: It is a genuine one! \nMadam Speaker: Je n’ai pas compris. \nMr Quirin: It is a genuine one! I can assure you! \nMadam Speaker: I do not want to be assured. It has to be authenticated. \nMr Quirin: I received it as it is. \nMadam Speaker: So, we cannot do any better. Okay, these are the Standing Orders.  \nYes, hon. Lukeeram, please! \nHARRY LATOUR STADIUM – RENOVATION WORKS – UPDATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/996",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 996,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/996) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the renovation works undertaken at the \nHarry Latour Stadium, he will state where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, the Harry Latour Stadium is owned by the Ministry and \nmanaged by the Mauritius Sports Council. It is operational and being utilised by both the public \nand football clubs. Following a site visit I conducted at the stadium, I requested that improvements \n\n79 \n \nbe made thereto for provision of better services and improved security to the public. These include \ninstallation of three metal gates, construction of a new septic tank, replacement of defective \nfloodlights and raising of a section of the boundary walls. \nI am informed by the MSC that these three metal gates have already been installed. A contract \nhas already been awarded for the construction of the new septic tank. Practical handing over of \nsite is being carried out today, 11 November 2025, and the works are expected to start by next \nweek. The duration of the works would be 60 days. Surveys are being carried out for the \nreplacement of defective floodlights and the raising of the boundary wall. Thereafter scope of work \nwill be prepared and bids will be launched accordingly. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? Everyone is happy? The hon. Second Member for Quartier Militaire \nand Moka! \nGENDER-BASED VIOLENCE – OCCUPATION & TENANCY ORDERS – LEGAL \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/997",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 997,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/997) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) asked \nthe Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to gender-based violence, \nshe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number of Occupation and \nTenancy Orders issued to victims thereof since 2019 to 2024, indicating whether her Ministry will \nconsider commissioning a study of the reasons why Occupation and Tenancy Orders are not issued \nin certain identified cases and collaborating with the Attorney General’s Office to identify legal \nmeasures to address the issue.",
      "answer": "Ms Navarre-Marie: Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that for the period 2019 to June 2025, a total of \n42 applications for Occupation Orders and three applications for Tenancy Orders were made. Out \nof these, seven Occupation Orders were issued and no Tenancy Order was granted. \nThe Protection from Domestic Violence Act was first enacted in 1997 to protect spouses \nfrom acts of domestic violence. It has since been amended in 2004, 2007, 2011 and 2016 so as to \nextend protection to persons living under the same roof, broaden the definition of domestic \nviolence and strengthen penalties. Originally, the Act provided for occupation and tenancy orders \nunder sections 4 and 5, and these were subsequently amended in 2011 through sections 4A and 4B. \n\n80 \n \nSuch applications are made before the District Court and both types of Orders may be applied for, \ntogether with a Protection Order or separately where the safety or housing of the victim is at risk. \nMadam Speaker, as to the reasons why such orders are not issued, I wish to inform the House \nthat this matter is being examined in the context of the ongoing review of the legal framework on \ndomestic abuse. The new Domestic Abuse Bill aims at strengthening protection and support for \nvictims and enhancing the effectiveness of the justice system. The Bill is currently being drafted \nat the level of the Attorney General’s Office and the issue of Occupation and Tenancy Orders will \nbe considered as part of this legislative reform. I am informed that the commissioning of a study \nis not envisaged at this stage. I also understand that the draft Bill will be communicated to my \nMinistry by next week. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Ms Thannoo? Thank you for that question. It makes three \nfor today. Thank you!  \nPQ B/998 has been withdrawn. So, now we have hon. First Member for Port Louis North \nand Montagne Longue! \nRODRIGUES – DISPLACEMENT & EXTENSION OF ELECTRIC POLES – \nMORCELLEMENT & NON_MORCELLEMENT AREAS – PENDING CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/998",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 998,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/998) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of Energy \nand Public Utilities whether, in regard to the displacement and extension of electric poles for high \nand low voltage networks in Rodrigues to new residents in morcellement and non-morcellement \nareas on State lands, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Electricity Board \n(CEB), information as to – \n(a) \nthe number of pending cases as at date for – \n(i) \nextension, and  \n(ii) \ndisplacement to allow customers apply for CEB clearance for Building and Land \nUse Permit, and  \n(b) \nwhether – \n(i) \na review of the CEB available Schemes to facilitate access to electricity, and  \n\n81 \n \n(ii) \nconsideration of special derogation for Rodrigues for remedial action to ease the \nfinancial burden on lessees thereat, will be envisaged.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIUS – PROPOSED FOOTBALL PROFESSIONALISATION – \nIMPLEMENTATION TIMEFRAME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/999",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 999,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/999) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the proposed \nprofessionalisation of football in Mauritius, he will state where matters stand, indicating the \nexpected timeframe for the implementation thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, with your permission I will reply to PQ B/999 and \nB/1021 together as they relate to the same subject. I thank the hon. Member for allowing me to \nexpatiate the plans and programme for the revival of football in Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker, we all remember the golden days/years of le roi football which had firmly \nestablished itself as the island’s most popular sport, transcending ethnic, social and religious \ndivides. The level of competition was intense and football became a unifying cultural force. \nFootball stars in five generations of youth players with a diverse fan base and stadiums were always \nfull, even regional matches were attended by thousands of enthusiasts. \nHowever, Madam Speaker, when I took office, football in Mauritius was in deep crisis. Our \nnational team was languished at the bottom of FIFA rankings; stadiums were more than often \nempty; enthusiasm has worn off; sponsors were reluctant to invest, given the lack of \ncompetitiveness and fan interest. Young athletes often preferred other emerging sports, leaving \nfootball with a shrinking base.  \nThe collapse of Mauritius football has been mainly due to the lack of political vision of the \nMSM-led government over the last 10 years. These are manifold, but may be summarised as \nfollows – \n \nneglected youth development; \n \nfailure to address governance issues; \n \nfailure to build structure, training centres, scooting system or coaching programmes; \n\n82 \n \n \ntalented players lacked pathways to professional careers, both locally and abroad, \nand \n \npoor maintenance, lack of planning and absence of community facility meant that \ninfrastructures failed to serve as a sustainable backbone for football. \nThe decline of Mauritian football was not a merely sporting issue, but a reflection of political \nshort-sightedness of lack of vision. Instead of harnessing football’s unifying power, leaders \nallowed communal division, poor governance and quick political fixers to undermine the sport. \nFortunately, Madam Speaker, Mauritius still has the potential to be a strong footballing \nnation. With the correct plans and political will, nous retournons au sport ses lettres de noblesse. \nMadam Speaker, already, the mood in the country is changing. Football matches have started \nto attract good crowds. The national team has started once again to perform decently. Football in \nvillages is picking up consistently. That is palpable. The meaningful results we are now \nexperiencing are not a mere coincidence. It is a process of a calculated approach.  \nIn this context, my Ministry and the Mauritius Football Association (MFA) have agreed to \ncollaborate for the revival of football, which also includes the professionalism thereof. \nAccordingly, together with MFA, we have developed a 4-year plan for the revival and the \nprofessionalisation of football. The strategic objectives of the plan are to – \n \nreform governance and transparency in football administration to ensure \naccountability, efficiency and trust; \n \nrebuild domestic competition to attract spectators, sponsors and media attention; \n \ndevelop strong grassroot and youth pathway through a comprehensive review and \nstrengthening of écoles de football to identify and nurture talents nationwide; \n \nprofessionalise football by establishing clear structures, standards and support \nmechanism for clubs, coaches and players to transition towards full-time \nprofessionalism; \n \nupgrade football infrastructures across the island to meet modern, safe and inclusive \nstandards; \n \ninvest in coaches, referees and administrators education to raise the technical and \nmanagerial level of Mauritian football; \n\n83 \n \n \nstraighten woman football as a key growth area for participation, visibility and \nleadership, and  \n \nrebrand football image to restore public confidence, pride and community \nengagement in the sport. \nMadam Speaker, the revival of football is estimated to cost some Rs238 million annually. \nThe annual breakdown of the proposed budget is as follows – \n \nRs120 million will be dedicated to men and women clubs to support operational \nyouth development and compliance with licensing standards. \n \nRs50 million will be directed towards grassroot and youth development initiative, \nincluding the revival of inter-school and inter-college competitions, the football for \nschool programme, football training centres and community or village football \nactivities. \n \nRs40 million will be invested in infrastructure and facilities, covering the \ndevelopment of mini pitches, upgrade to football training centres and creation of \nwomen football friendly environment. \n \nRs8 million annually will support coaches, education and technical assistants, \nincluding CAF licensing coaches, continuous professional development and the \ntraining of grassroot educators. \n \nRs10 million will be allocated to enhance facilities, establish national league and \nfacilitate international participation in respect of beach soccer and futsal. \n \nRs10 million will be earmarked for sport science and hyper performance programme \nto strengthen fitness, medical and performance analysis support unit. \nMadam Speaker, the MFA will contribute financially through co-investment in projects \nfunded by FIFA Forward, CAF grants and sponsorships. With dedicated allocation earmarked for \nclubs’ licensing, youth leagues and national team participation, Government will also participate \nin this initiative. In collaboration with FIFA Forward and related international assistant \nprogrammes, priority will also be given to the development of new AstroTurf pitches. These \nfacilities will serve to modernise regional football infrastructure, provide year-round, all-weather \ntraining and competition surfaces and support grassroot youth, woman football, futsal and \ncommunity football activities. \n\n84 \n \nAccording to MFA, USD 50,000 is available for grassroot football development. In primary \nschools, the MFA has also indicated that FIFA funding is also available for 10 synthetic surfaces. \nAdditionally, the MFA has received 1,000 balls, donated by FIFA for the football of schools’ \nproject. \nMadam Speaker, on the technical side, my Ministry and the MFA will act as a lead agency \nfor planning and coordinating the project for the revival of football, overseeing grassroot youth, \nwoman football, futsal and beach soccer programmes. It will also be responsible for implementing \ncoach education, referees and technical assistants. Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! You both have the right to speak! \nMs Savabaddy: Merci, Madame la présidente. Lors de la conférence de presse du ministre, \ndatant du 2 octobre dernier, un programme de détection pour les U15 à U18 a été évoqué. Or, \nquand on voit la carrière des grandes vedettes, ils ont commencé bien plus tôt, même à l’école \nprimaire. L’honorable ministre peut-il nous dire ce qui sera fait à ce sujet ? Merci. \nMr Nagalingum: I have a meeting with my good friend, the hon. Minister of Education. We \nare working on a plan and this is coming shortly. We are going to announce it. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMs Savabaddy: Merci, Madame la présidente. Puisque le mot de professionnalisation a été \névoqué pour la relance du football, quelle serait la fourchette de salaire qui sera proposée aux \nfootballeurs choisis ? Merci. \nMr Nagalingum: How can I say it now? Let the plan come first. We will work on it and \nthen we are going to decide on the amount we are going to give to the football.  \nMs Savabaddy: The plan is not ready? \nMr Nagalingum: No. \nMs Savabaddy: Okay. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Quirin! \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. L’honorable ministre peut-il dire à la Chambre \nquelles structures de bonne gouvernance seront mises en place pour superviser la mise en œuvre \n\n85 \n \ndu projet ? Car comme il l’a dit lui-même, plusieurs centaines de millions seront dépensés chaque \nannée. \nMr Nagalingum: The project is in an implementation phase over three years. So, when it \ncomes to governance and infrastructure improvements, it will occur in the first 18 months. So, we \nare giving time and working on it. I am sure that all the technical assistance, training and financial \nguidance will be provided as we go along, and we are going to see the results soon. \nMr Quirin: Dernière question, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Quirin: Récemment à la presse, l’honorable ministre a parlé de miracle à venir pour le \nfootball mauricien, peut-il de ce fait dire à la Chambre, quels sont les principaux indicateurs de \nperformance qui sont très utiles, qui seront utilisés pour mesurer les résultats au fil des années, \nbien sûr ? \nMr Nagalingum : When we are talking of miracles, there is miracle because nous avons la \nvolonté et le gouvernement, l’ensemble du gouvernement, le Premier ministre et le Deputy Prime \nMinister et tout le monde ensemble pour faire de sorte que nous donnons toute notre attention pour \nque la relance se fait et avoir des résultats. \nMr Quirin: Les indicateurs de performance – ma question est sur les indicateurs de \nperformance… \nMr Nagalingum : You have to wait! \nMadam Speaker: Il faudra attendre. I have a few more minutes. So, I will ask Mr Babajee, \nyes! \nWESTERN REGION – WATER SUPPLY – RESERVOIRS – WATER TANKER \nTRUCKS – REMEDIAL ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025",
        "tuesday-25-november-2025",
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1000",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1000,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/1000) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the western region, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to the – \n(a)  number of – \n(i)  \nreservoirs located thereat, indicating the respective capacity thereof, and  \n\n86 \n \n(ii)  water tanker trucks available to supply households thereat, and  \n(b)  remedial actions being envisaged to ensure regular and sufficient water supply thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, en ce qui concerne la partie (a) de la question, la \nCWA m’informe que la partie West du pays qui comprend les régions de Rivière Noire, Tamarin, \nLa Gaulette, Case Noyale, Petite Rivière Noire, Bambous et Cascavelle, est alimentée par un \nréseau de distribution intégré, lui-même alimenté par treize réservoirs de services. Je dépose à \nl’assemblée le tableau indiquant la capacité de chaque réservoir. \nEn ce qui concerne la partie (a) (ii) de la question, je suis informé par la CWA \nqu’actuellement deux camions-citernes, malheureusement que deux camions-citernes, sont \ndéployés dans la région de Rivière Noire pour répondre aux demandes des consommateurs par le \nbiais des systèmes de plaintes. Ces deux camions-citernes quoiqu’insuffisants, je l’admets, \nfonctionnent selon un calendrier prioritaire garantissant une intervention rapide dans les zones \nvulnérables, les zones de basse pression et les ménages subissant des interruptions prolongées. Par \nailleurs, la CWA a lancé un appel à manifestation d’intérêt pour louer des camions-citernes \nsupplémentaires, je l’ai dit ce matin encore, pour l’ensemble de l’île afin de renforcer sa flotte \nexistante pendant la saison de stresse. \nMadame la présidente, concernant la partie (b) de la question, je vais aller un peu vite, j’ai \nété informé que la CWA entreprend actuellement des actions correctives suivantes pour améliorer \nl’approvisionnement. Tout d’abord une station de traitement d’eau a été installée à Beaux Songes \npour traiter 2000 m³ par jour pour la région de Beaux Songes, Cascavelle et parallèlement la CWA \nréalise actuellement une étude de faisabilité pour l’installation d’une autre station de traitement \nd’eau d’une capacité de 2000 m³ sur la rivière de Bois Noire. L’objectif est d’accroître la \nproduction d’eau destinée au réservoir d’eau Bois Puant améliorant ainsi l’approvisionnement de \nCoteau Raffin. \nDeuxièmement, la CWA a l’intention de moderniser la pompe, monter en puissance pour \ncette pompe, pour qu’elle puisse pomper de l’eau de la rivière Baie du Cap afin d’accroître le \nvolume et la fiabilité de la prise d’eau à la rivière de Baie du Cap. Nous faisons aussi, il faudra \ndire, Madame la présidente, la CWA continuera par ailleurs d’identifier des emplacements \nstratégiques pour les forages. Il y a déjà, on a foré déjà à l’arrière de UBP à Bambous et ce forage \nsera mis en service la semaine prochaine afin d’accroître la mobilisation de ressources. \n\n87 \n \nDernière petite chose, Madame la présidente, je suis heureux d’informer la Chambre que la \nCentral Procurement Board a enfin donné son accord final, l’autorisation finale pour the Rivière \ndes Anguilles Dam. Rivière des Anguilles Dam, l’appel d’offres. Donc, on a reçu l’approbation \nfinale, le lancement d’appel d’offres est prévu pour quelques semaines, donc fin novembre 2025. \nLe gouvernement MSM va sûrement dire que… et l’attribution du contrat est prévue pour avril \n2026, donc l’année prochaine et la construction devrait débuter en août 2026, l’année prochaine \ncela va commencer et s’achever pour terminer à la veille des élections en août 2029. La \nconstruction du barrage contribuera à atténuer la pénurie d’eau dans une grande partie de l’Ouest. \nMerci, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker : Je vous en prie. \nSo, now Mr Babajee, you are okay? \nMr Babajee: Yes, thank you. \nMadam Speaker : Mr Beechook ! I think it’s the last question now. \nST GÉRAN HOTEL – ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT LICENCE – \nCONDITIONS, REVISION & OUTCOMES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1001",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1001,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/1001) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in regard to the \nSt Géran Hotel, he will state when was the Environmental Impact Assessment licence for works \non the beach and in the adjacent marine area issued thereto, indicating – \n(a)  the conditions attached thereto, and  \n(b)  whether it subsequently submitted a request for the revision thereof and, if so, indicate \nthe – \n(i)  \njustifications provided, and  \n(ii)  whether same was approved and site inspections/ compliance assessments \ncarried out by his Ministry to ensure adherence to the conditions set out in the \nEIA licence and the outcomes thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Bhagwan: Thank you, Madam Speaker.  \n\n88 \n \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the House that on \nthe 13 October 2023, the One&Only Le Saint Géran for proponent submitted an EIA application \nfor the proposed work at One&Only Le Saint Géran at Poste de Flacq, including – \n(i) \nthe construction of groynes; \n(ii) \nthe construction of breakwaters; \n(iii) the installation of rock revetments using basaltic rocks, and  \n(iv) beach nourishment. \nFollowing consultations with relevant stakeholders, the application was examined by the \nEIA Committee at its meetings held on 07 June 2024 and 05 July 2024. An EIA license was granted \nto the proponent on 10 July 2024.  \nMadam Speaker, I will be tabling a list of conditions attached to the EIA license granted to \nthe proponent.  \nWith regard to part (b) (i) of the question, on 13 May 2025, One&Only Le Saint Géran made \nan application for a variation to the EIA license for coastal protection works, pertaining to \nreplacement of basaltic rock by sandbag at the core and with basalt rock capping at Rock \nRevetment 2 near the helipad using the sand available from its premises. The proposed work \nmethodology would allow for rapid execution of the works in order to mitigate the ongoing severe \nerosion problem. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (b) (ii) of the question, following receipt of the request for \na variation to the EIA license for coastal protection works with respect to Rock Revetment 2, my \nMinistry had consultations with relevant authorities, including the following – \n \nMinistry of Housing and Lands; \n \nMinistry of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries; \n \nMauritius Oceanography Institute; \n \nDepartment for Continental Shelf and Maritime Zones Administration and \nExploration, and  \n \nThe National Coast Guard. \n\n89 \n \nNo objection was raised to the request made by the proponent for the variation of the EIA \nlicense and the application for variation was examined by the EIA Committee at its meeting held \non 04 July 2025. On 10 July 2025, a letter of approval to variation for the coastal protection works \nwas issued to the proponent with conditions. I will be tabling a list of conditions attached to the \nletter of approval. \nMadam Speaker, as regard compliance and assessment, I wish to inform the House that \nduring implementation of works, site inspections and monitoring were duly effected by my \nMinistry on three occasions namely, on 06 August, 29 September, and 08 October 2025 and \nassessments were carried out to determine whether works were undertaken as per their approved \nmethodology and conditions imposed in the EIA license as well as approval granted by my \nMinistry for variation for coastal protection works. The salient mitigating measures observed on \nsite included – \n1. provision for geotextile screens to prevent sediment entrainment were in place; \n2. provision of signboard to inform public of the works were in place; \n3. working area cordoned-off for public safety, and alternate public access provided, and \n4. dedicated personnel appointed to continuously verify the integrity of geotextile screens. \nMadam Speaker, the House may wish to note that on 05 August 2025, protests were received \nfrom fishers regarding works around the helipad, following which works had to be halted by the \nproponent. A consultative meeting with fishers was organised on 12 August 2025 by the proponent \nand same attended by representatives of different Ministries, including my Ministry. Subsequently, \na case was lodged at the Supreme Court by the proponent against those interfering with the works. \nFurther to an interlocutory order from the Supreme Court on 10 September 2025, works resumed \non 26 September 2025. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that the works were completed on 07 October \n2025. To date, no non-compliance to conditions of the EIA license and of the letter of approval to \nvariation for the coastal protection works has been observed. Regular monitoring is being ensured \nat the level of my Ministry and the Ministry of Agro-Industry. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Beechook.  \n\n90 \n \nMr Beechook: May I please ask the hon. Minister whether there had been inspections \ncarried out with regards to pollution in the lagoon which, ultimately, led to disrupt the activities of \nthe fishermen of the locality who are still protesting that they have not been consulted adequately \nor simply look into solutions to remedy this? \nMr Bhagwan: Madam Speaker, there are regular monitoring which are effected by the \nMinistry of Agro-Industry, responsible for the Fishing Department, and as well by my Ministry. \nSo, there have been representations. I think compensations were given to the fishermen and they \nwent to Court and ultimately, we are having a permanent monitoring at our level, weekly.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Ms Manan. \nAGRICULTURE CURRICULUM – NCE & SHOOL CERTIFICATE LEVEL – \nMINISTRY’S POLICY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1002",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1002,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/1002) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister \nof Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to Agriculture as a subject, he will state – \n (a) the number of secondary schools currently offering same at School Certificate level; \n(b)  the policy of his Ministry regarding the teaching thereof at National Certificate of \nEducation level, and \n(c)   whether a curriculum therefor has been developed for Grades 7 to 9 and, if not, why \nnot.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, at the very outset, I wish to thank the hon. Member for \nthis pertinent PQ referring to Agriculture.  \nI wish to inform the House that Agriculture, as a mainstream subject, is currently not \navailable in state colleges, and is only available in private colleges under the PSEA. However, \nstate colleges as well as private colleges, are providing a full-fledged one-year programme entitled \n‘Introduction to Smart Agriculture’ within the Foundation Programme in the Literacy, Numeracy \nand Skills. The students of the foundation programme delve into eco-friendly farming methods \nsuch as organic farming, aquaponics and hydroponics, and develop hands-on skills through \npractical activities.  \n\n91 \n \nThe elective also addresses the pressing issue of climate change, guiding students to \nunderstand its impact on agriculture and how climate-resilient strategies can ensure sustainable \nfood production. Allow me to salute the good work being done in these schools. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that 40 grant-aided schools currently \noffer Agriculture as a mainstream subject. Out of these 40, 28 schools including 8 from Rodrigues, \ncurrently, offer agriculture as a mainstream subject up to the School Certificate level. The 12 \nremaining schools currently offer Agriculture as a mainstream subject up to grade 9.  \nMadam Speaker, as regards part(b) of the question, the annual programme for the National \nCertificate of Education assessment 2025 does not include Agriculture as a compulsory core, \noptional core or non-core subject for the said assessment.  Private colleges, however, that are \nauthorised by the PSEA to run the subject at Grade 7 to 9, conduct their own internal examination \nat school level. The PSEA has established requirements for the teaching of Agriculture in grant-\naided private schools as follows – \n1. \nThe educators for Agriculture should possess a degree in agricultural field; \n2. \nThe number of periods allocated weekly for Agriculture for Grade 7 to 9 is either one \nor two periods; \n3. \nStudents of Grade 7 to 9 are provided with free textbooks, and  \n4. \nThe teaching facilities should be as per specific norms and standards.  \nMadam Speaker, regarding part (c) of the question, I am informed that although the Science \ncurriculum covers related topics such as plants, photosynthesis, food production, food security and \nthe use of fertilizers, there is presently no formal curriculum for Agriculture that has been \ndeveloped for Grade 7 to 9 by the MIE. \nMadam Speaker, the curriculum for Agriculture has not yet been developed due to the fact \nthat there is an insufficient number of secondary school educators qualified to teach Agriculture. \nIt is therefore necessary to design and implement a teacher professional development programme, \nand to equip our state colleges with the adequate facilities prior to the effective introduction of the \nsubject.  \nDuring my recent visits to Rodrigues and Agaléga, I had fruitful meetings with the \nstakeholders including students and parents who requested the introduction of Agriculture and \n\n92 \n \nMarine Science among others as taught subjects. These requests have been favourably entertained \nand the blueprint for education which will be made public soon, will spell out the way forward. \nTo conclude, the expression, ‘Let us produce what we consume and consume what we \nproduce’ is not only topical but pertinent as well. Together with my colleague, the hon. Minister \nof Agro Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries, we are going to initiate joint \nprogrammes to encourage our children to embrace farming and agriculture; be it as a subject, as a \nhobby or as a profession later on.  \nThank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, I have two minutes left.  \nHon. Babajee, do you think you can have a go and see if the hon. Minister won’t take too \nlong? I do not want to be unfair to you, again.  \nPOST CYCLONE BELAL – FORTHCOMING RAINY SEASONS – FLOOD \nMITIGATING MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1003",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1003,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/1003) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the forthcoming rainy seasons, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the preventive measures being taken \nregarding – \n(a) \nTamarin River, following one loss of life during flooding in the wake of Cyclone Belal; \n(b)  Petite Rivière Noire where the road is always blocked and the whole village flooded, \nand  \n(c)  Cotteau Raffin drain near the entrance of Le Morne Road.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, regarding part (a) of the question, I am informed that very \noften, after heavy rainfall, water from the mountains flows and accumulates on the classified roads \nalong Tamarin River. Unfortunately, it would appear that since the loss of life during flooding in \nthe wake of cyclone Belal, this matter has not been given due consideration or ay remedial measure \ntaken.  \n\n93 \n \nI must here, thank the hon. Member, to have raised this very pertinent question and to \nreassure him that the Land Drainage Authority has been requested to look into this issue and \nconsider the construction of a cut-off drain along with other flood mitigating measures.  \nRegarding part (b) of the question, I am informed that the region of Petite Rivière Noire was \nofficially declared a flood prone area by the LDA since June 2022, following repeated floodings \nwhich resulted in road blockages and inundation of residential areas. The floodings are mainly \nattributed to the low-line topography of the village and the confluence of the 4,2 km Petite Rivière \nNoire River with its tributaries, Rivulet Minguel and Feeder Pavé which drain towards the village.  \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that as part of the short-term mitigation works, \ndesilting of Feeder Pavé and Rivulet Minguel was completed in February 2023, covering a total \nstretch of 0.7 km at a cost of Rs980,000. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part(c) of the question, I am informed that Cotteau Raffin \nbeing a coastal settlement located along B9 Coastal Road with steep mountainous slopes on the \nlandward side and the flat residential terrain on the seaward side is an area highly susceptible to \nrun off driven flooding. A full-fledge drain project is being implemented by the NDU with \nconsultancy support from Lux Consult. The design for the drain project has already been \ncompleted and is presently at land acquisition stage. Same is expected to be finalised by March \n2026. Once all clearances would be available, the NDU will request for funding to proceed with \nthe bidding exercise and implement the project which is estimated to cost some Rs60 million. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Members, time is up! \nThe Table has been advised that the following PQs have been withdrawn: B/1006, B/1007, \nB/1008, B/1009, B/1010, B/1012, B/1013, B/1014, B/1015, B/1016, B/1018, B/1019, B/1022, \nB/1024, B/1025, B/1026, B/1028, B/1029, B/1030. \nI hope there is no mistake because it is quite long.  \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, Sir, I beg to move that all the business on today’s \nOrder Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) Standing Order 10. \n\n94 \n \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nSTATEMENT BY MINISTER \n(4.11 p.m.) \nALPHA BRAVERY BOARD VESSEL – DRUG HAUL – FRIDAY 07 NOVEMBER \n2025 \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I wish to make a statement in \nrelation to the drug haul of 433.10 kg of a white substance suspected to be cocaine; the street value \nof which is estimated at Rs6.5 billion, on the board vessel Alpha Bravery. \n On Friday 07 November 2025, in the evening, the Police Headquarters received information \nthat parcels suspected to contain drugs, had been found on board of Alpha Bravery by the captain. \nActing promptly on this information, the National Coast Guard initiated continuous tracking of the \nvessel using its operational surveillance systems and established communication with the ship’s \nMaster. \nAlpha Bravery left Brazil on 07 October 2025 and was proceeding towards Singapore with \na load of iron ore. Its final destination was scheduled to be China. The vessel sailed under the flag \nof Greece, having on board 23 crew members, including six Hellenics, one Russian and 17 \nFilipinos.  \nAfter having found suspected drug parcels on board, Alpha Bravery contacted the \nDesignated Person Ashore of the shipping company based in Greece and requested for bunkering \nin Mauritius. \nGiven the potential magnitude of the threat, the Commissioner of Police directed the \nactivation of a multi-agency response involving the National Coast Guard; the NCG Maritime \nIntelligence Cell; the National Coast Guard MARCOS, which is the Indian Navy’s Marine \nCommando Force; the Anti-Drug and Smuggling Unit; the Special Mobile Force; the Mauritius \nRevenue Authority; the Scene of Crime Office; the IT Unit; the K9 Unit and the Elite Marine \nCommanders. \n\n95 \n \nA detailed operation plan was formulated to safely intercept the vessel, prevent any \ndestruction or transfer of evidence at sea, and ensure the safety of all the personnel involved. On \nthe same day, that is, on Saturday 08 November, NCG commandos boarded the Alpha Bravery \nfrom the police helicopter. They winched them down. Thereafter, the vessel headed towards Port \nLouis harbour under escort of the National Coast Guard. \nAlpha Bravery dropped anchorage at about two nautical miles off the port limit on Sunday \n09 November 2025 in the morning. The Police and Customs Anti Narcotic Sections boarded the \nvessel and met with the Master, a Greek national.  \nTwo hours after anchorage, Lawyer Avineshwur Raj Dayal, whose services had been retained \nby Indo Oceanic, Local Shipping Agent of Alpha Bravery, boarded the cargo vessel.  \nThe Master of Alpha Bravery related that he was informed by the chief officer to the effect \nthat on Friday 07 November 2025, whilst the chief engineer was carrying out a routine check in \nthe engine room, he came across 15 suspected abnormal plastic parcels, each secured with a life \njacket. \nThe suspected parcels were conceived in the cofferdam of the engine room. The Designated \nPerson Ashore of the shipping company, which is based in Greece, instructed the master to cause \nthe door of the engine room to be welded for security reasons.  \nUpon the instruction of the Police on Saturday 08 November, the welded door of the engine \nof Alpha Bravery was cut open. There were 15 suspected plastic parcels. A search in the cofferdam \nof the engine room revealed the presence of a raffia bag containing spare batteries, ropes as well \nas several ignition lights. All these were secured. \nIt is obvious, Madam Speaker, that the life jackets and other materials found on board were \nto be used for off-loading in the sea of these drugs. This is a well-known modus operandi among \ntransnational drug traffickers, as a means to recover drugs in the high seas, to evade security \npatrols. \nThe parcels found on board by the Police were cut. It was found that they contained a white \nsubstance suspected to be a ‘Dangerous Drug to wit Cocaine’.   \nThe crew members all denied knowledge thereof.  \nDNA swabbing of the parcels was conducted by the Police. \n\n96 \n \nThe Police has also enlisted the collaboration of other jurisdictions to determine the possible \nramifications in this case. \nMadam Speaker, as I have stated to the House on a number of occasions, the nefarious \nenvironment fuelled by drugs, drug addiction, drug trafficking and other drug-related crimes that \nthe previous government has left as legacy is alarming.  \nAs stated in the House previously, the previous government failed to act on information it \nreceived on the suspicious movement of ships probably transporting illegal substances crossing \nour waters. \nAt one point, in June 2024, there were two ships crossing near our shores. One headed to \nSeychelles and the other one was heading to Mauritius. The one that went to Seychelles was \narraigned by the Seychelles authorities and 900 kg of narcotics were seized on that vessel. \nHowever, the ship advancing in our waters was allowed to move freely. The Police were made \naware of this information, but it turned a deaf ear, much to the disappointment of the Regional \nMaritime Information Centre (RMIC) – a centre which is dedicated to the coordination of regional \noperations at sea with respect to maritime safety and security in the Western Indian Ocean. Now, \nwe can all guess why the Police in this country did nothing while Seychelles intercepted the other \nvessel! \nIn the case of the Alpha Bravery, this action of the Mauritian Police constitutes a record-\nbreaking seizure in our fight against narcotics trafficking. It raises the legitimate question as to \nwhy such an operation has never been undertaken during the past 10 years, especially when it is \ncommon knowledge that    transnational drug trafficking knows no frontiers and that our region is \nnot spared from that scourge.   \nIt is known that numerous vessels regularly cross the southern seas, with the probability that \nsome are involved in criminal activities, carrying drugs across our waters.  If we have been able to \neffect such seizure, this is due to immediate action following receipt of information indicating the \npresence of a dodgy vessel possibly with drugs near our waters. \nMadam Speaker, the Alpha Bravery operation demonstrated outstanding inter-agency \ncoordination, tactical efficiency and operational discipline. From the very outset, monitoring, \ntracking, and coordination of the entire operation was undertaken in a professional and exemplary \n\n97 \n \nmanner by the CP and the teams of NCG, MARCOS commandos, ADSU and SOCO teams, the \nMRA and also K9 units. With the support of the Mauritius Port Authority, all contributed to this \nremarkable success. \nI wish to express my deepest appreciation to every officer involved in this complex and high-\nrisk operation. Their actions, conducted in full compliance with established standard operating \nprocedures and international maritime law, ensured both the safety of all personnel and the \npreservation of crucial evidence. \nThis seizure, which is one of the most significant in the recent times, sends a strong message \nto international trafficking networks that Mauritius will not tolerate the use of its maritime domain \nfor illicit activities. Our agencies will continue to defend our territorial integrity with \nprofessionalism, courage, and resolve. \nI reaffirm, Madam Speaker, the Government’s steadfast commitment to combating drug \ntrafficking and transnational organised crime. We shall continue to strengthen inter-agency \ncooperation, invest in intelligence capabilities, and enhance training and technology to safeguard \nour people, our economy, and our reputation as a law-abiding nation. The success of Operation \nMV Alpha Bravery stands as a proud example of what can be achieved when our security forces \nact with unity of purpose, guided by integrity, discipline, and patriotism.     \nThis is also why during my official visit to India, I asked for the assistance of India for the \ncontrol of our now very extensive maritime EEZ, and India, Madam Speaker, has kindly agreed to \nour request. We are thankful to India.  \nThere should be no doubt as to the unflinching resolve of Government to combat drug-\ntrafficking. \nMadame la présidente, en tant que chef de gouvernement, je voudrais dire, haut et fort, \ndevant cette auguste Assemblée, que nous continuerons à être impitoyables contre la mafia en tout \ngenre. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much, hon. Prime Minister. May I suggest that we break \nnow and then we can come back for the Bills. Thank you. \nAt 4.21 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \n\n98 \n \nOn resuming at 4.56 p.m. with the Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated. \nPUBLIC BILLS \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the following bills were read a first time – \n(i) \nThe Police (Amendment) Bill (No. XXVII of 2025) \n(ii) \nThe Courts (Amendment) Bill (No. XXVIII of 2025). \nSecond reading \nTHE POLICE (AMENDMENT) BILL \n(No. XXVII of 2025) \nOrder for Second Reading read. \n(4.58 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that the Police (Amendment) Bill (No. \nXXVII of 2025) be read a second time. \nMadam Speaker, the Police (Amendment) Bill (No. XXVII of 2025), this Police \n(Amendment) Bill (No. XXVII of 2025) is both urgent and historic in its purpose. It is designed \nnot merely to amend the law but to redefine the capacity of our Police Force, restore public \nconfidence, and correct the systemic failings that have hindered police inquiries and ultimately \nplagued delivering justice in our country for far too long. \nThe Police Act of 1974 has been the foundation of policing in Mauritius for over fifty years. \nWhile this legislation at the time served our nation well, the nature of crime has changed \ndramatically since its enactment. \nToday, the Police Force faces unprecedented challenges posed by transnational and \ntechnology-driven offences. These crimes are complex, sophisticated, and often borderless, \nexploiting globalisation and technology in ways that outstrip the reach of conventional \ninvestigative methods and local resources alone. \n\n99 \n \nUnder Section 9 of the Police Act, one of the primary duties of the Police is to prevent and \ndetect offences. This provision was drafted at a time when criminal activity was largely localised, \nand investigations could be conducted within familiar parameters. \nHowever, offences such as drug trafficking, human trafficking, money laundering, \ncybercrime, and other complex criminal enterprises have become increasingly prevalent. These \nare not only sophisticated in execution but also frequently involve networks operating across \nmultiple jurisdictions, leveraging advanced technology and financial instruments to evade \ndetection. Criminal organisations have grown, we all know, in sophistication, and without modern \ntools, Mauritius is falling behind in the fight against these threats. \nThe investigations of serious and long-standing unresolved cases, such as the Kistnen case, \nthe Nadine Dantier case, and other cold cases, are often beyond the capacity of local expertise \nalone. These are intricate matters that require specialised skills and a knowledge of how to deploy \nthem, for example in digital forensics, communications technology and financial analysis, skills \nthat, without external support, are not practically available locally. \nThe existing Police Act does not provide the Commissioner with the authority to engage \nforeign investigative expertise, and as a result, local officers, despite their dedication and \nprofessionalism, have at times been constrained in their ability to resolve these cases efficiently. \nThis limitation has not only delayed justice but, in some instances, allowed criminals and their \nnetworks to operate with impunity, undermining both public confidence and national security. \nMadam Speaker, the House will recall the Kistnen case, an MSM Political agent, a matter \nthat has long symbolised the failures, or should I say deliberate failures, of the previous regime. \nUnder the former government, this inquiry was mismanaged and deliberately misled the \npublic, with critical leads ignored, investigative protocols circumvented, and opportunities to bring \nclarity to the matter squandered. What was clearly a case of homicide was made to appear to be a \ncase of suicide. Had the people not booted them out, it would have remained a case of suicide. \nNobody would have known. No further investigation would have been made and that would have \nbeen that. The very able magistrate who presided the Judicial Inquiry was as reported in the press \nunforgiving about how the police who investigated the case were unprofessional and I recall what \nwas said on the case: it marks a new level of incompetence. So, incompetent they were. Families \n\n100 \n \nof the victim were left in anguish – no answers, there was no closure and public confidence in the \nintegrity of law enforcement was severely eroded. \nThis Government, in contrast, is determined to rectify those past mistakes, ensuring that \nevery aspect of the investigation is conducted transparently, professionally, and in full accordance \nwith the law. We already know and I mentioned it the other day that forensic experts abroad have \nalready concluded that it was not suicide but murder. \nBy empowering the Police to retain specialised investigative officers from overseas in \nserious and complex cases, we will contribute to restoring institutional rigour into important police \ninquiries and we will finally pursue justice in cases that the previous administration tried to cover \nup. \nBringing in experts from abroad with specialised skills, independence and international \nexperience to assist our police in the reopening of this case and in other major inquiries, will make \npossible the pursuit of all leads available and the thorough investigation of matters, which by \nreason of passage of time, may become very difficult to unravel. I will give you an example – and \nI have witnessed this – for example, somebody tried to destroy his mobile phone. He burnt the \nphone and threw it in the sea. This was found by the police – I am talking about the police in UK \n– the phone was destroyed by fire; they managed to get the information out of that phone. We \nintend to do this here as well, with their expertise.  \nJust as those whose loved ones are affected by disease, the victims of those who were injured \nor affected by crime, could not care less about the identity or the nationality of the police officers \nwho bring them assistance in their hour of need and find out who is guilty. They cry out for justice. \nThis is what matters to them. Who is finding out does not matter for them. This is what we are \ntrying to do. Just like my hon. friends who are doctors here. When somebody is very ill, you not \ngo and see from which community he belongs or which colour he is. You want the best doctor. \nThis is exactly what we are doing here with the police force. This measure and the radical and far-\nreaching reforms we will bring forward in the coming months, will provide us with the best chance \nof answering their cries.  \nThe proposed amendment to Section 22 of the Police Act directly addresses these challenges. \nA new subsection (1A) is being introduced, which provides that – \n\n101 \n \n(a) \nThe Commissioner of Police may retain the services of foreign specialised \ninvestigative officers to carry out complex or serious criminal inquiries. This does not \nprevent a local policeman to be there but he may retain the services of a foreign \nspecialised investigating officer. \n(b) \nSuch officers shall act under the direction and control of the Commissioner of Police \nor any other police officer designated by him. \n(c) \nThe specialised investigative officers will have no powers of arrest, and \n(d) \nEligibility to serve as a specialised investigative officer will be restricted to persons \nwho have served in a foreign law enforcement authority and who have demonstrated \nspecialist expertise in the type of inquiry for which their services are retained. \nMadam Speaker, I stress that these foreign specialised investigative officers will be under \nthe direct control of the Commissioner of Police or any other police officer designated by him. \nThey will not be able to initiate or decide upon any police inquiry but will instead carry out \nspecific, complex or serious criminal inquiries as directed by the Commissioner of Police or any \npolice officer designated by the Commissioner.  \nAs I mentioned, these foreign specialised investigative officers will have no powers of arrest \nand as I have said, this reform is part of a broader legislative and institutional programme that we \nshall bring forward shortly, that will transform our law enforcement, strengthen the rule of law and \nrestore institutional integrity. It complements the recent interim amendments to the Financial \nCrimes Commission Act of 2023, which were immediately necessary to address the deliberate and \nstructural weaknesses inserted and inherited from the previous administration. \nUnder the previous Government, investigations into complex financial crimes were \nfrequently delayed, completely mismanaged or allowed to stagnate, owing to overlapping \nmandates, unclear line of accountability and frequent confusion over prosecutorial authority. Cases \nwent unresolved for years, creating a perception that financial and other malfeasance could occur \nwith impunity.  \nThe FCC amendments have corrected these failings decisively. By restoring the primacy of \nthe Director of Public Prosecutions, those amendments ensured that prosecutions are coherent, \nconsistent and subject to rigorous oversight. Cooperation between the police and the FCC has now \n\n102 \n \nbeen strengthened, closing loopholes that previously allowed suspects to evade justice. Above all \nour reforms, we will signal to the public that no person, however influential, is beyond scrutiny \nand that our institutions are capable of acting decisively and independently. These measures are \nmore than technical adjustments; they are systemic corrections of past errors, restoring integrity \nand public trust in the administration of justice.  \nMadam Speaker, let me be clear: this Government is not merely tinkering with the law. We \nare correcting the failures of the past, restoring professionalism and accountability and sending a \nclear message. Mauritius will no longer tolerate delays, inefficiency or institutional inadequacy. \nFamilies of victims will be concerned about the integrity of our institutions and our international \npartners must have confidence that justice will be delivered, the rule of law will be upheld and \njustice will be delivered on time, not in ten years’ time as we have seen these days.  \nThis Bill aligns fully with the Government Programme of 2025-2029 which commits to \nmodernising our institutions, enhancing law enforcement capacity and reinforcing public trust. By \nenabling the engagement of international experts, strengthening investigative capacities, and \nlinking reforms to broader legislative measures such as the FCC amendments and the coming law \nenforcement transformation, we will ensure that our law enforcement agencies are prepared for \nthe challenges of the modern criminal landscape. \nIn conclusion, Madam Speaker, this Police (Amendment) Bill is necessary now so that \ncritical inquiries can benefit from the expertise it will enable the police to bring to bear. It \nempowers the Commissioner of Police to take effective action in cases of complex crimes, \naddresses unresolved cold cases and strengthens institutional integrity while helping to restore the \npublic faith in justice. It complements recent legal changes that have corrected systemic failings \nand prepares the ground for our further transformative reforms which will firmly situate Mauritius \nas a nation where the rule of law is paramount and where justice is timely, independent and \nimpartial.  \nThis is our contract with the country, Madam Speaker, and the Bill shows that we shall not \nflinch from fulfilling that promise. For these reasons, Madam Speaker, I commend the Bill to the \nHouse. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \n\n103 \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Seeburn, yes! \n(5.10 p.m.) \nMr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle): Thank you, \nMadam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker, I rise today in full support of the proposed Police (Amendment) Bill \nintroduced by the hon. Prime Minister. This Bill has a profound importance to the functioning of \nthe law enforcement in our Republic. This Bill comes at a time when we must strengthen the \ncapacity of the Mauritius Police Force to deal with increasingly complex forms of crime while \nensuring that the rights of individuals remain protected, upholding our democratic institutions and \nthe rule of law. The existing Police Act does not allow the Commissioner of Police to engage or \nretain services of foreign investigators as the hon. Prime Minister said earlier. \nMadam Speaker, henceforth this Bill will empower the Commissioner of Police to retain \nservices of foreign specialised investigative officers under its direction and control, so as to \nenhance the investigative capacity of the police in dealing with enquiries in serious and complex \ncriminal cases and put a clear and transparent process within the bounds of our constitutional right, \nso as to modernise and restructure the police work.  \nI strongly believe, Madam Speaker, that this can mark a positive step in the renewal of our \njustice system that fosters public confidence. This is more than a legal reform as it says to every \nMauritian, rich or poor, powerful or ordinary that in our Republic, the law stands above all to serve \nthe vulnerable and uphold the rule of law. \nMadam Speaker, justice has no borders. In today’s world, crime does not stop at our shores. \nWe face frequent criminal cyber intrusions, international money laundering and drug trafficking \nleading to violent criminal offenses. We heard earlier in the House the Statement of the hon. Prime \nMinister, highlighting the legacy of drug problems left by the previous Government, which is \nalarming and needs to be tackled urgently. This Bill sends a strong signal to the public that this \nGovernment intends to keep pace with those developments. This is about acquiring expertise and \nnot interference. \nBy bringing in foreign investigators under the supervision of the Commissioner of Police, \nour officers will be acquiring specialised knowledge and best international practice to deal with \n\n104 \n \ncomplex cases that require advanced technical and foreign expertise which will, ultimately, serve \nthe public interest and the fight for justice in Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker, public trust is essential. When citizens believe that police investigations \nare competent, fair and transparent, they are more likely to cooperate. The Bill provides the \nopportunity for the Mauritius Police Force to demonstrate that competence and fairness. The Bill \nrecognises the need to reform our investigative capacity in complex criminal cases, and this is \nconsistent with a broader shift towards aligning our system with international standards that will \nenhance public confidence so that every investigation is impartial, thorough and beyond suspicion. \nMadam Speaker, this Bill serves as a stepping stone towards a more comprehensive reform \nwith a prudent approach, ensuring that there is institutional clarity and competence to meet the end \nof justice. Specialised foreign investigators will work hand in hand with our national police. They \nwill transfer knowledge. They will share techniques and this will enhance our local capacity so \nthat in time, our own officers can handle even the most sophisticated crimes. \nMadam Speaker, this Bill provides for the foreign specialised investigative officers to act \nunder the direction and control of the Commissioner of the Mauritius Police Force to carry out \npolice enquiries in complex criminal cases. The Bill does not create any parallel avenue beyond \nnormal oversight simply because experts are foreign. The Bill ensures that those assisting have \nlimited scope. As noted, they will have no powers of arrest and they will properly integrate under \nthe Police Commissioner’s direction. \nMadam Speaker, this approach shows that Mauritius is confident, and not insecure. We are \na mature democracy, promoting transparency and accountability. We are ready to face the truth, \nwhatever it may be. This is the mark of a strong and responsible nation. \nMadam Speaker, the objective of our Government is simple: no crime, no matter how \ncomplex, powerful or hidden, can go undetected or unpunished. By welcoming foreign expertise \nand cooperation, we are sending a clear message that in Mauritius, justice will always prevail. \nMadam Speaker, in an era where criminality is complex and serious, we must ensure that \njustice remains one step ahead. Retaining foreign investigators is not a sign of weakness, but rather \na sign of wisdom. It gives our citizens confidence that every investigation will be fair, transparent \n\n105 \n \nand professional. This is how we strengthen our institutions – by learning, by collaborating and by \nnever compromising on the truth. This Bill should not be viewed in isolation. It sits within the \nbroader reform agenda of the Government in modernising the criminal justice process in complex \ncases. \nMadam Speaker, allow me further to address a matter of great importance: the proposal to \nretain services of foreign investigators within our national system of law enforcement is not a \nquestion of capacity, but rather it is a question of credibility and collaboration. The world of crime \ntoday has changed. Criminal networks are sophisticated, transnational and often backed by vast \nfinancial resources, making it more difficult for our local investigators to gather evidence. To fight \nthem effectively, Mauritius must be ready to tap into global expertise as a demonstration of \nstrength and transparency. \nMadam Speaker, let me say that we are proud of our dedicated local investigators, but when \nwe invite foreign experts to collaborate in complex, serious criminal cases, we are not undermining \nour police force. We are, in fact, empowering it. Foreign investigators will bring specialised \nknowledge and advanced technology with international best practices that can enhance our local \ninvestigations and help to build the capacity of our own officers through skills transfer and joint \noperations.  \nIn a democracy, justice must not only be done. It must be seen to be done. Madam Speaker, \nby involving independent experts in criminal cases, we are sending a clear signal to our citizens \nand to the international community, that Mauritius has nothing to hide, that we are committed to \nuncovering the truth, and that no crime will go undetected or unpunished regardless of who is \ninvolved. This amendment will, therefore, strengthen public confidence in our institutions and \nreinforce the reputation of Mauritius as a country governed by the rule of law.  \nThis Bill makes it clear that such collaboration will remain under the full authority and \nsupervision of the Commissioner of Police. The sovereignty of Mauritius will never be \ncompromised. The foreign officers will strictly operate within the legal framework and for the \nspecific purposes authorised under this Bill. \n\n106 \n \nMadam Speaker, we are not alone with this amendment to the legislation. Even the greatest \nnations in the world, like the United Kingdom, the United foreign investigators in the interest of \ntruth and justice. They did so not because their institutions were weak, but because they were \nstrong enough to be transparent. Mauritius can do same with confidence and without hesitation. \nMadam Speaker, before I conclude, I wish to place on record my sincere thanks to the hon. \nPrime Minister for his leadership, vision and determination in bringing this important amendment \nto the Police Act before the House. It is about protecting our citizens, our families and our \ndemocracy. It shows that this Government has the courage to act when it matters most in defence \nof justice. It reflects a clear and courageous vision – a vision of a Mauritius where law enforcement \nis modern, professional and accountable, where justice is above politics and where no crime can \ngo undetected. This is the kind of reform that strengthens our democracy and reassures our people, \nwhere they can have full confidence in the institutions that protect them. \nMadam Speaker, I truly believe that one day, history will remember this reform as a turning \npoint where Mauritius chose to strengthen the rule of law to open itself to global expertise, and to \nreaffirm that justice in our country is firm and fearless. We are moving forward in building a nation \nwhere our citizens feel protected, where institutions are trusted and where the guilty can no longer \nhide in the shadows. \nI, therefore, urge all the Members of this House to come together in support of this Bill so \nas to make our country safer, stronger and prouder. Madam Speaker, with these words, I thank \nyou. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Junior Minister! \n(5.20 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade \n(Mr H. Narsinghen): Madam Speaker, thank you for giving me the floor. \nLet me explain the context prompting the presentation of the Bill of today. Madam Speaker, \nlet me remind Members of the House that 11 November, in a way, is the liberation day. You know \nfully why it is the liberation day. We must thank the enlightened electorate, as mentioned by the \n\n107 \n \nPrime Minister, which has uprooted the unprecedented dictatorship and rogue state put in place by \nthe previous regime. \nThe black period of our history was marred also by alleged extrajudicial killings like the case \nof late Mr Kistnen, as alluded by the Prime Minister. Not only Mr Kistnen, but also, late Mr \nKanakiah and Mrs Mooniaruth, and so many others. We have witnessed, unfortunately, \nunprecedented alleged judicial killings which have not been elucidated. Here, I reiterate my \nsympathies and condolences to the bereaved families.  \nI use the term ‘alleged extrajudicial killings’ but let us see the findings of the bold magistrate \nregarding the judicial inquiry which took place and which speaks volume and speaks for itself.  \nIn a nutshell, Madam Speaker, the bold magistrate found that the death was not a suicide. \nShe described the case as a clear case of criminal homicide and our Prime Minister mentioned \nabout murder, possibly there was murder. The inquiry report also criticised, don’t forget, the \nconduct of the police investigation. We all know that there were attempts of cover-up. We all know \nthat Mr Kistnen was a prime political agent in No.8. The Magistrate qualified the handling of the \ncase by the police in a very strong term as “abhorrent”, that is, repugnant. It marked unprecedented \nincompetence and attempts to cover up. Who attempted to cover up? You all know who attempted \nto cover. Who wanted to be Prime Minister and judge at the same time? The report found serious \ndeficiencies, missing footage, poor management of evidence, defalcation of papers in the hands of \nthe victim. In light of the report, the DPP, as you know, intimated the police to carry out in-depth \ninquiry. Unfortunately, this was not carried out.  \nOur actual Prime Minister promised to rope in foreign investigators and this is being done \ntoday. We have to walk the talk. The number of speakers during previous debates mentioned about \nthat. This was being done in the past on an unofficial and ad hoc basis without the proper legal \nframework and safeguard measures. For example, in the past, if we were having recourse to foreign \ninvestigators, unfortunately, evidence of such investigators could not be admissible. \nNow, the objective of the Bill, you will see that the Police (Amendment) Bill represents an \nimportant opportunity to modernise our investigative system and very important is to restore public \nconfidence in our law enforcement. While some police officers, we have to acknowledge, display \ncourage and dedication in their daily duties, unfortunately, some do not do the same. The reality, \n\n108 \n \nMadam Speaker, is that our investigative framework remains outdated in many respects. We \ncontinue to rely excessively on confessions and provisional charges, often at the expense of robust \nevidence-based investigations and I lay emphasis on this concept of evidence-based investigations \nwhich is very important. When confessions are later retracted or declared inadmissible, \nunfortunately cases collapse.  \nThe over-reliance on confessions, you will see, Madam Speaker, reflects systemic \nshortcomings. Insufficient training in investigative technics and also a lack of advanced forensic \ncapacity and limited access to modern equipment. Our training system although improving over \ntime still does not provide officers with specialised competency-based development in \ninvestigation and in many advanced jurisdictions, detectives must follow clear professional \npathways that include modules in crime scene management, digital forensics, financial \ninvestigations and evidence handling.  \nIt is true that we have many capable and qualified officers, including more than 500 with \ndegrees in Police Studies and Law. At one time, as the head of the Law Department, with the \nMauritius Police Force, the University of Portsmouth and the blessings of Mr Dan Bhima and the \nCP, Mr Gopalsingh and also Dr. Navinchandra Ramgoolam who was then Prime Minister and, of \ncourse, still Prime Minister, we trained more than 350 policers, crowned with a BSc in Police \nStudies.  \nUnfortunately, what we have seen over the years, they are too often underutilised and seldom \npromoted to positions of command, based on merit and competence. This must change and we are \nhere to build a credible, modern police force and also a more modern investigative force. People \nwith qualification, Madam Speaker, and experience, should get fast-track promotion like it was \ndone with cadet inspectors. And, I would recommend here a two tiers system of recruitment and \npromotion. It is important, I believe, that on one hand we focus more on physical criteria and \npossibly lower qualifications and I would make that special recommendation to the Prime Minister \nbut on the other hand, it is also important to focus for some people, especially those in the \ninvestigative department to focus more on qualifications, IQ and experience and possibly then \nlesser physical qualities.  \nAnother very important point, Madam Speaker, we find out that in Mauritius for many years, \nthere have been major limitations in our forensic infrastructure. Mauritius depends heavily on the \n\n109 \n \nForensic Science Laboratory which certainly plays a crucial role but lacks the full range of \nspecialisation found in modern forensic institutes. Forensic medicine, DNA analysis, digital \nforensics and ballistics are areas that demand continuous investment in both people and \ntechnology. A well-equipped forensic laboratory, independent, very important, accredited and \ntechnologically advanced is vital for building cases that can stand up in court. Without it, even the \nbest intention investigations are hamstrung by the lack of scientific support.  \nNow, what we also see that we have to address in the future, we must also acknowledge a \nshortage of modern investigative tools, for example, 3D scenes scanners, digital evidence \nlaboratories to proper crime scene mapping and also imaging equipment. These technologies, \nMadam Speaker, are standard in leading agencies, not only to enhance accuracy but also to ensure \ntransparency and accountability. I am sure in the future, besides trying to rope in foreign \ninvestigators, we have also to embrace international best practices and see the role models \ninternationally but also at the regional level. There is much we can learn from international best \npractices and certainly the Prime Minister referred before to the United Kingdom and also, I will \nalso refer to Netherlands, not only the United Kingdom, Singapore, Germany, stand out as global \nleaders in investigative science and technics.  \nThe United Kingdom, as you know, through Scotland Yard and the College of Policing \npioneered the PEACE Model of investigative interviewing, an evidence-based approach, that \navoids coercion and focuses more on reliable, admissible statements. The Netherland, as you know, \nholds one of the world’s most sophisticated forensic institute, the NFI which integrates over 40 \nforensic disciplines with a rigorous, very important, quality control framework. Singapore also has \ninvested massively in digital and forensic innovation through its home team science and \ntechnology agency. While Germany’s federal criminal office, once one of the world’s most \ncomprehensive forensic systems serving as a model of scientific integrity and efficiency.  \nNow, we should not only look at the European countries, I think also within Africa, South \nAfrica offers a useful regional reference. Despite its challenges, South Africa possesses, as you \nknow, Madam Speaker, the continent’s most advanced forensic and digital investigative capacity, \nparticularly through the Hawks Directorate of Priority Crime Investigation and I believe that \ntargeted cooperation with South Africa, especially in areas like DNA and organised crime \ninvestigations could bring practical regional benefits. \n\n110 \n \nNow, at the same time, that we are trying to rope in foreign investigators, it is important to \nhave the proper regulation and also domestic oversight. That’s said, any collaboration with foreign \ninvestigators must be strictly regulated and this is what has been done by the Prime Minister and \nhis team who prepared the law. Their role should be, I lay emphasis on that, to support, not to \nsupplement, not to supplant our national institutions. They must operate under the clear authority \nand the supervision of the Commissioner of Police and Senior Mauritian Officers.  \nForeign investigators should have no powers of arrest – this was mentioned rightly so and \nhammered by the hon. Prime Minister – no powers of search and seizure. The mandate must remain \nvery technical and advisory. All evidences collected or processed must comply fully with the \nMauritian law, a Chain of Custody protocols must be safeguarded by our own officers.  \nRecourse to foreign investigators does not mean to flout the golden principle of rule of law \nand also, I will hammer that we have to be fully compliant with human rights. We have to reconcile \nthe tracking of crimes and also respect for human rights is of utmost importance.  We have to \ncomply with section 10 of the Constitution.  \nIn short, foreign assistance must serve our sovereignty but not certainly to weaken it. So, \nadvance investigative techniques can and must coexist with constitutional safeguards. Modern \npolicing in democratic societies depends not on coercion but on precision, on science, \ndocumentation and respect for the due process of law. Every foreign expert deployed in Mauritius \nmust therefore comply with our own legal standards and the universal principles of justice and \ndignity.  \nNow, obviously, there is the clear intention of Government to seek foreign investigators. In \nspite of the intention, there was no legal framework to rope in foreign investigators; now this is \nbeing done. The Government has already expressed its readiness to seek foreign expertise from \nrenowned agencies such as Scotland Yard, but also from other countries, not only Scotland Yard. \nWe have good experts from India, from South Africa, especially in serious and sensitive cases, for \nexample, the unresolved matters involving late Mr Kistnen, Mr Kanakiah and so many others.  \nThese cases, Madam Speaker, unfortunately, have deeply affected public confidence. This \nwas mentioned by my colleagues. It is right that the hon. Prime Minister intends to demonstrate \nthat such alleged crimes will not go uninvestigated. The involvement of respected foreign experts \n\n111 \n \nin these specified cases would show that Mauritius, the government, means business and is serious \nabout transparency and accountability.  \nNow, we have to be careful. It does not mean that if we are amending the law, this is a \npanacea or a miracle solution. Obviously, it is not a miracle solution. However, we must be clear, \nrecourse to foreign investigators will solve to a great extent our problems. Lasting progress will \ncome only and I lay emphasis on that, through structural reforms and also massive investment at \nhome. This will take time inevitably.  That means building our own forensic capacity, modernising \nour equipment, professionalising our investigative ranks. It also means rewarding merit over \npolitical affiliation, over community or creed. The future of policing Mauritius must be based \ncompetency and integrity.  \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Junior Minister, time is almost up, please.  \nMr Narsinghen: Yes. So, thank you for your attention, Madam Speaker. I will rest my \nsubmission here and I commend the Bill.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nHon. Minister, Mr Pentiah. \nWe all keep an eye on the time.  \n(5.36 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms (Mr L. Pentiah): Madam \nSpeaker, I start by quoting – \n“The object of this Bill is to amend the Police Act so as to empower the Commissioner of \nPolice.” \nThis, Madam Speaker, speaks of itself, the very object of today’s Bill before the House. I \nstand, Madam Speaker, to contribute in today’s debate on the Police (Amendment) Bill (No. \nXXVII of 2025) before the House which is far more than a technical amendment. It stands as an \nessential component of this Government’s broader reform agenda aimed at modernising, \nprofessionalising and restoring public confidence in our law enforcement institutions.  \nThis Bill may appear simple in its form, yet it carries with it profound moral and institutional \nsignificance. It reflects this Government’s resolve to restore justice, accountability and the rule of \n\n112 \n \nlaw particularly in the wake of heinous, unsolved crimes that have for too long haunted our \nconscience as a nation. How can we not feel for the families of the public officers who lost their \nlives in suspicious circumstances, to say the least. The following names come to mind, Madam \nSpeaker. \nJhurry Vijay Anand, 18 June 2020, falling at Medine Mews building in Port-Louis, from the \n11th floor. He was a Procurement Officer at the NDU at the time.   The report described the incident \nas ‘décès après une chute’ rather than a clear suicide or deliberate act, reported Le Mauricien of \nthe date.  \nLate Sarah Boitieux, again 2020. She was at the time working as a typist and administrative \nemployee at the then Prime Minister’s Office. She was found with a scarf around her neck, hanging \nby the handle of a cabinet in the kitchen. That also in the wake of all the discrepancies and \nunequivocally questionable incidents concerning procurement incidents. Her death occurred \nwithin days of several other suspicious deaths of civil servants in the late 20s. We have mentioned \nthe case of Pravin Kanakiah. Some commentators on this case linked Boitieux’s death to a wider \nset of suspicious deaths among others.  \nMadam Speaker, speaking of Pravin Kanakiah, besides of what was said about him, let me \nplease bring this before the House. His body was found on 11 December 2020 at La Roche-qui-\nPleure with a different set of clothes that he was found in Reduit at his workplace. The official \nautopsy carried by Dr. Sudesh Kumar Gungadin, attributed the cause of death to a traumatic \nsubarachnoid haemorrhage, i.e. bleeding in the brain due to trauma. This was reported in the media. \nAn investigation by the MCIT and subsequent judicial inquiry were opened to clarify the \ncircumstances. During the hearings, the medical experts gave evidence that the injuries were \nconsistent with blunt forced trauma rather than natural cause of suicide alone. I quote – \n“The victim had 16 injuries on the body. The victim was already dead when the body fell \ninto the water. This is not a case of drowning.” \nDr. Gungadin reported in 5-Plus. Yet, the police still maintain the official line that the death is a \nsuicide. The ….. said, and I quote – \n “The Police studied for different possibilities and avenues before concluding to suicide.” \ndespite the medical evidences casting doubt. \n\n113 \n \nMadam Speaker, we mentioned the case of Mrs Mooniaruth. Mrs Mooniaruth, once more, \nwas concerned with cases of procurement. She climbed on a chair at the roof of the Registrar \nBuilding and then jumped off that. What is deplorable about the circumstances of this sad incident \nis that the then Minister of Public Service came to this House and revealed alleged confidential \nmedical report of the late person. \nIt was allegedly said that this person was suffering from depression. The family stood strong \nto deny such claims. This person’s case is still unresolved. Madam Speaker, we have the case of – \nfinally, I must say, I shall add to it –Mr Kanakiah and of Mr Soopramanien Kistnen. \nMadam Speaker: Mr Kistnen. \nMr Pentiah: This case was in 2020. The backdrop of all the cases brings this case into \nanother aspect and forces us to look at it from this perspective. Mr Kistnen was no one else, but \nthe agent of the MSM in Constituency No.8, Moka and Quartier Militaire. He was no one else, but \nwho worked closely day in, day out with the then Prime Minister, Pravind Jugnauth. It at his place \nthat they sat for tea and for breaks. It is his family who catered for them as well as Mr Sawmynaden \nand Mrs Luchoomun. Yet,this person’s body was found in a field calcinated. Rather hastily, the \npolice, at the time, classified the case as a suicide case. \nHad it not been for a competent member of the bench, had it not been for a magistrate who \nfeared nothing, had it not been for a magistrate who was in search of the truth, the judicial inquiry \nwould have perhaps stayed at a stage of suicide!  \nShe uncovered and revealed to us the failings of a system of investigation. The hon. Prime \nMinister mentioned the word ‘deliberate’ earlier on. I believe he was not deliberate in mentioning \nthe word ‘deliberate.’ This is, in fact, palpable, open and shut, deliberately closing a case when it \nshould not be closed.  \nMadam Speaker, such cases, such instances, such heinous crimes call upon us to be cautious \nto answer to the legitimate expectations of the people of our country. The Government stands \nresolute in its commitment to bring perpetuators to justice and to uphold a zero-tolerance policy \nagainst crime, corruption and impunity. A pledge made to the people, who with faith and \nconviction, renewed their trust with us. \n\n114 \n \nHow symbolic it is, Madam Speaker, that this Bill is being presented on 11 November – a \nday that coincides exactly one year after the landslide victory at the elections of November 2024 \nof the people of our country. A victory of renewal. A victory of integrity. A victory of hope.  \nMadam Speaker, the Police (Amendment) Bill No. XXVII of 2025 seeks to amend Section \n22 of the Police Act, as I said, to empower the Commissioner of Police to retain the services of \nforeign specialised investigative officers to assist in complex or serious criminal inquiries.  \nAs said by hon. Seeburn, these experts will operate under the direction and control of the \nCommissioner of Police of our country or a designated officer. They will have no powers of arrest. \nTheir function will be to assist and strengthen investigative capacity, to bring technical expertise \nand to inject scientific credibility into the conduct of serious and complex investigations. The \nintention is to reinforce our police force to enable it to work alongside specialists who possess the \nforensic and analytical sophistication required by modern day criminal investigations. \nMadam Speaker, our police force has always been a pivotal institution in maintaining law \nand order. Its members served courageously across the island. Yet, we must confront reality with \nhonesty and courage. \n Over the past decade, we have witnessed an erosion in investigative competence often \n‘deliberate.’ I repeat myself with this word, and this not a mere political statement. Madam \nSpeaker, it is an observation echoed by the population.  \nI have considered the book ‘Forensics in Paradise: A Mauritius Odyssey’ by Dr. Satish \nBoolell. In his book, Dr. S. Boolell is bare – the systemic failures of our investigative political \nsystem, crime scenes left unsealed, evidence mishandled, external pressures, external political \npressures and a lack of scientific rigor. He recounts how, amongst others, in the Bassin Blanc case, \nessential forensic details such as post-mortem timing and larval evidence was ignored. \nMadam Speaker, in the end, our past and recent history of unresolved criminal cases is not \njust the path left by the past decade. It is the burden on our collective conscience today. This Bill, \nthough seemingly straight forward, carries profound way. It is our collective acknowledgement. \nThe time of complacency and silence must come to an end. If we do nothing, we become \naccomplice in the injustice that has claimed too many innocent lives. That, Madam Speaker, would \n\n115 \n \nbe an affront to a belief in the sanctity of human values, in the sanctity of human lives and in the \nface of the rule of law. \nLet this Bill be concrete evidence for the 27th time before the House that human lives are \nabove pure, basic unsupported political decisions. Let it be a sign that this Government stands for \nethics, stands for courage, and stands for its commitment to truth. Let us operate within the bounds \nof law guided by justice, and not by convenience.  \nLet this Bill be a pathway for shared experience. Let this Bill be an opportunity for our police \nforce to learn and train amidst foreign specialised experience investigators to be more efficient. \nThe time has come to restore faith, rebuild integrity and reclaim trust in our institutions.  \nWith these words, Madam Speaker, I commend the Bill. I thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister of Agriculture!  \n(5.51 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries (Dr. A. Boolell): Madam Speaker, I feel rather sorry that the Leader of the Opposition and the Whip of the \nOpposition have chosen to stay away when we are debating a very important Bill – the amendment \nto the Police Act. It is not because only one provision is being amended that this Bill is not \nsignificant. \nIt is a Bill which is full of significance and means a lot. The Prime Minister has committed \nand given a firm commitment that justice will not be delayed.  Justice will be done! \n He has stated without fear or prejudice that we would not tolerate a culture of impunity and \nit is a message being sent loud and clear to those who have gotten away with heinous crimes but \nthey will not get away now. With heinous crimes or illicit trafficking and they have started to \nquake in their boots. \n  Undetected crime will not remain a mystery irrespective of complexity. The rule of law has \nto prevail and we are instilling confidence in the minds of people for far too long, people in this \ncountry have been living in fear and no one, Madam Speaker, no citizen likes a case closure. \nGovernment is determined to walk the talk to unravel complex criminal cases and the \ninvestigations become less arduous because the mutual legal assistance and extradition treaty we \nhave signed with many countries especially with Commonwealth countries. \n\n116 \n \nFrance is a willing part of the mutual legal assistance but not over extradition. And, the Bill \nwas a promise made to the nation to bring to justice suspects in the Kistnen case and other criminal \ncases. Let me quote, Madam Speaker –  \n“the hon. Prime Minister, Dr. Navinchandra Ramgoolam has reiterated his dissatisfaction \nwith the initial management of this enquiry and has that the truth will be pursued relentlessly, \nensuring that justice is served not only for the family of Soopramanien Kistnen but for the \nentire nation.” \nMadam Speaker, they are unresolved cases because of gross interference from a corrupt \nregime. There was an era of forestall over law and order during the MSM regime. \nCollusion and flagrant violation of separation of power was inevitable because of State \ncapture. The decadent filthy regime set up the political arm of the Executive to threaten, to frame \nand made arbitrary arrests with duplicity of special teams within the Police Force. \nSpecial Striking Team will no longer strike at political opponents. The former Commissioner \nof Police was a lackey of the MSM-led regime and the MSM in government had been a curse and \nthe curse of the nation and was involved in shady deeds and never dared to address front forcefully \nand frontally transnational crime. It had a culture and still has a culture of perverting the course of \njustice.  \nThe CP, we have trust in him, in the light of arrests made over drugs which was discovered \non board of a ship. The CP we follow the trail to detect, with the services of experts, those who \nhave perpetrated the crimes. And, let me refer to 2 cases which were deliberately closed, the ICAC \nU-turn on MedPoint, Madam Speaker, was shocking. And I quote – \n“The MedPoint case is a shadow looming over the Prime Minister Pravind Jugnauth and his \nruling MSM party. In an election year, the London-based Privy Council is supposed to decide \nwhether or not Jugnauth broke anti-corruption laws by taking part in the buying of a decrepit \nclinic partly owned by his own sister. The first time that a sitting Prime Minister is facing \nsuch a trial in the history of Mauritius.” \nAnd I quote – \n“Now, on the eve of the case being heard in London, the ICAC has switched sides, from \nprosecuting to defending Jugnauth. This is not the first time that the MSM has attempted to \n\n117 \n \nsquash a case in this way and when it comes to MedPoint, it is only the latest in a long line \nof attempts made by the current government to bury the case”. \nThose were the days and these days are over, Madam Speaker. We had to deal with a political \nparty in power which had links with the Mafia and let me remind the House of the Angus Road \nsaga and this is what Mrs Prayag wrote in L’Express on 19 November 2020 and she said it without \nfear and she had the guts to say it in the face of adversity and she said it, and I quote – \n“This saga started as a sale of property where the source of funds and the mode of payment \nraised a number of legal questions. It then took on a political dimension when it transpired \nthat Pravind Jugnauth, who currently holds the office of prime minister in an election being \nchallenged at the Supreme Court, had been or is being investigated by the Independent \nCommission Against Corruption (ICAC) in connection with the purchase of property and \npossibly also for unlawful cash payments under the Financial Intelligence Anti Money \nLaundering Act. Ironically, this piece of legislation was enacted when he was minister! \nWhen confronted in parliament, [we have put several questions to him. I did when I was \nLeader of the Opposition but he chose to run away and he chose not to reply], he sought to \nhide behind an alleged ICAC enquiry to refuse to answer to parliamentary questions. \nSubsequently, it emerged that only a few weeks after taking office in December 2014, the \nMSM government cancelled a request for information on this matter sought from the UK’s \nSerious Fraud Office under the Mutual Legal Assistance Scheme. The saga continued with \ndisclosures about investigations being supposedly concluded not once but twice already in \nthe past for lack of evidence.”  \nNothing says the case cannot be reopened. It has to be reopened in the name of justice and \nwe have to do it as a responsible government. We cannot allow those who have links with the \nMafia to get away with murder, with corrupt practices, Madam Speaker. \nAs information trickles down far from clarifying the issues, it also deepens the legal and \npolitical … There are now far more questions that the hon. Prime Minister, former Attorney \nGeneral, Ravi Yerrigadoo and the ICAC have to answer in the public interest. \nThe Pack & Blister scandal, the sale of planes of Air Mauritius are financial crimes with \nhuge payments made in all opacity. The MSM regime in power never had the will and \ndetermination to wage war on illicit activities. It was party to it. \n\n118 \n \nShould I highlight the connection with Franklin, Madam Speaker. Illicit drugs, especially, \nsynthetic drugs, are cheap but did they have the courage to wage war on drugs? No! They were \nlenient and should I say, Madam Speaker, they had connection with the Mafia. \nThe digital age has revolutionised drug-trafficking, has revolutionised human trafficking, \nmoney laundering, illicit trading in firearms, trafficking of wildlife and natural resources against \nthe CITES – the Convention of International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and \nFlora.  \nIt is the fourth largest transnational crime activity of drugs, counterfeit and human trafficking \nand the CP with his team is expected and, rightly so, to break the vicious circle. The war on drugs \nand the barons is a national and transnational war. \nAs to transnational crimes, they have too often escaped us but we are saying time to put an \nend to this because we are going to come with a team which can deliver and we are going to enlist \nthe services of experts to wage war on transnational crime.  \nBecause it is an organised crime, it is a multibillion industry that operates across borders, \nexploiting vulnerable persons and undermining global security. In Africa alone, it accounts to 4% \nof the continent’s GDP, over more than 90 billion US dollars.  \nMadam Speaker, unfortunately, we cannot comment on ongoing cases before the Supreme \nCourt but it is good to find out how many Ministers of the previous regime had acquired properties \nbuilt by Mamy R. We need to find out and they have acquired properties built by the person who \nis under question by the Financial Crimes Commission. We have to find out who bent the rules \nand bent backwards for a few dollars more to allow the likes of Sobrinho to wash, rinse, dry and \nspin dry the money. He was given a certificate of good character and a banking licence by Financial \nServices Commission, bypassing the Bank of Mauritius. All these cases have transnational \nimplications. \nAs a low tax jurisdiction, the hon. Prime Minister is sending strong signals that the police \nforce would neither retreat nor surrender on complex criminal cases. The file will not be closed. \nNotwithstanding the diligence of the Financial Crimes Commission, new legislation will be \nintroduced to set up the National Crime Agency with a highly specialised officer to head the \nagency, and I have been told that he will probably be recruited from Scotland Yard. Our anti-money \n\n119 \n \nlaundering programme, in line with our legal and regulatory obligation, I must say is robust. An \nUnexplained Wealth Order and Interim Freezing Order are well entrenched in our legislation.  \nThe amendment to section 22 of the principal Act gives unfettered power to the \nCommissioner of Police to enlist – as has been highlighted and reinforced by all those who have \nintervened – the services of experts in criminal investigations, as has been stated, let us say it again, \nwith no power to prosecute. There are specialised police who will use data and latest technology \nas the hon. Prime Minister has stated, to unravel mysterious crimes. They will collect sufficient \nevidence for the suspect to be indicted before the Court.  \nMay I remind the House that on 21 February 1998, the hon. Prime Minister appointed a \nsenior police officer from UK to study reform of our police force, the famous Constable Shattock \nand when we did so, some of us were sneering. Some people outside were sneering. The hon. \nPrime Minister was right to enlist the services of an expert to revamp our police force, to inculcate \nnew values, to reinforce the relevance and importance of being sincere to the police force and to \ndeliver and to be able in relation to work which is being entrusted to the police force.  \nA Memorandum of Understanding was signed on Friday 30 2011 in the Council and Senate \nroom of the University in the presence of Deputy Commissioner of Police because our objective \nas was highlighted by hon. Professor Narsinghen is that we need to look at capacity building. We \nhave to make sure that our police force is a police force which is constantly being updated with \nconstant breakthrough in technology, and funding was released by Government, by the Office of \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communication. Yes, it was \nthanks to us, under the leadership of hon. Prime Minister, Navinchandra Ramgoolam, that \nUniversity of Mauritius ran courses for police officers, including BSc Honours Police Studies and \nvarious continuous education and tailormade programmes such as Diploma in Police Studies. \nMadam Speaker, as I have stated, this legislation is an act of faith, of commitment from a \ngovernment which believes in separation of power. The amendment to the Police Act empowers \nthe Commissioner of Police to retain the services, as and when required, of foreign specialised \ninvestigative officers to carry out serious, complex criminal inquiries under his control. We have \ngiven a commitment to this House and I firmly believe, and I know the public has placed trust in \nus. A year since we have this absolute trust from the public and we are here to live up to the \nexpectations of the public. We are here to live up to their expectations! We have a moral \n\n120 \n \nresponsibility to act and to act without fear or prejudice. This is the trust that the public has \nconfided in us and we have to live up to the trust confided in us by the public and we are here for \nthe public because you have to live up to their expectations. \nThank you very much. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Prime Minister! \n(6.08 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, Madam Speaker. I wish first of all to thank all the hon. Members \nwho took part in the debates. Again, such an important piece of legislation, the Opposition is \nabsent. As we reach the conclusion of the debates, I wish to say, Madam Speaker, that this has been \na golden opportunity for them to participate because this is a piece of legislation that will transform \nthe whole because this is part of a bigger picture.  \nWe have said that the challenges we face today are not the same challenges that we faced at \nthe time of independence or in 1974, which the Police Act was dealing with at the time. We have \nchallenges which are beyond our borders. We have to have a police force which is equipped, which \nis trained and which will also not allow corruption to come in, that they have to do their job that \nthey are paid to do. This is what we are doing. We have to move with time. We are in this fast-\nevolving world and improved technology. It is important that we seek expertise of those who have \nacquired that expertise over a long time. I gave the example earlier on of this mobile phone. This \ncannot be done in Mauritius at this time. It cannot be done but it will be done once we put in place \neverything of this armada that we are talking about. \nI wish to reassure the House that the reforms are being pursued thoroughly but within the \npolice force but not only instruction operations, also at the level of recruitment, you will see \nchanges. We want to have the best people. Now, we do not want people who are motivated to \nbecome policemen and policewomen. This recruitment policy itself is being reviewed and this \nenlistment of foreign experts is not a reflection on the capacity of our officers. They have not had \nthe training; they have no knowledge. They have to have this capacity building. That is why we \nsaid that we want to have foreign experts, including Commonwealth experts and we will train our \nown people. We have some very able police officers in our police force but they have not had the \n\n121 \n \ntraining that they should have had. We have very often seen in the past big flaflafla on the papers, \nsomebody is arrested and then nothing.  \nThis is what we want to change, Madam Speaker. We have to move with time. As I said, it \nis part of a bigger picture. We are bringing the National Crime Agency Bill. This is will be a total \nchange in Mauritius. Total change – it will transform the police force and with the support of these \nforeign experts, we will be able to do what we have not been able to do so far. We have many \nexamples. I have given the example because it is the latest case of Kistnen, where here, the police \nexperts and everything had a look and they decided it was a suicide case. But how is it now that \nwe know it was murder? It was actually murder. I know the judicial inquiry was done by this very \nable Magistrate. The report has not been published but we had bits and pieces in the Press and \nwhat she says in it, is exactly what I am saying. The incompetency level, probably deliberate – \nbecause you know, with the MSM, it is always covering up.  \nWe have seen when the Minister went to depone, you had snipers on the roofs. But all this \nwill change. As I said, this is part of the bigger change that is coming. What I am saying is that I \nam confident. With the changes that we will bring, the people of this country will get results – and \nresults on time, not delayed – concrete results, and justice will prevail.  \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. You have to commend the Bill once more to the House. \nThe Prime Minister: I commend the Bill to the House. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nBill read a second time and committed. \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(Madam Speaker in the Chair) \nThe Police (Amendment) Bill (No. XXVII of 2025) was considered and agreed to. \n\n122 \n \nOn the Assembly resuming with Madam Speaker in the Chair, Madam Speaker reported \naccordingly. \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Police (Amendment) Bill (No. XXVII of 2025) was read \nthe third time and passed. \nADJOURNMENT \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister, adjournment of the House! \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now adjourn to \nTuesday 25 November 2025 at 11.30 a.m. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned! \nI have two Members who want to make adjournment matters. Mr Ramkalawon, please! \nMATTERS RAISED \n(6.16 p.m.) \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 9 – QUEEN VICTORIA – PUBLIC TRANSPORT SERVICE \nMr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil): Madam Speaker, my \nrequest is addressed to the Minister of Transport. I am speaking on behalf of the residents of Queen \nVictoria of my constituencyto bring his attention to a critical issue affecting the daily lives of these \npeople, which is the severe lack of adequate public transport, especially after 5 p.m. The \ninhabitants have to walk around 3-4 km to go back home from Flacq. This issue has affected many \nstudents, especially during the exams period. Therefore, I, once again, make an urgent appeal to \nthe Minister to take immediate actions. Thank you. \n\n123 \n \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Minister! \nThe Minister of Land Transport (Mr Osman Mahomed): The matter was raised before. \nI will ask the Commissioner of the National Land Transport Authority, Mr Nabeebaccus, to look \ninto the problem. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Ms Henriette-Manan! \n(6.16 p.m.) \nPEROS BANHOS VESSEL BREAKDOWN – RODRIGUES’ SUPPLIES SHORTAGES – \nREMEDIAL MEASURES \nMs D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues): I would like to bring to the \nattention of the hon. Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries with \nregard to the breakdown of the vessel Peros Banhos that will certainly, once again, cause major \nshortages in Rodrigues, given that Mauritius Trochetia can serve as a replacement, but with \nhundred fewer containers. Can the hon. Minister kindly see that measures are considered at the \nearliest to address this situation to prevent the recurrent shortages that we, unfortunately, face each \nend of year? Thank you. \nThe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries (Dr. A. Boolell): I thank the hon. distinguished lady who gave me advanced notice. \nMadam Speaker: The distinguished lady is an hon. Member! \nDr. Boolell: She is an hon. Member. I said hon. Member! \nMadam Speaker: Yes, okay. \nDr. Boolell: I reinforce it. \nMadam Speaker: Oh, okay! Don’t get angry, Dr. Boolell! \nDr. Boolell: Following which, I raised the issue with my Senior Chief Executive, and a \nmeeting was held at the Ministry. The engineer of the Mauritius Shipping Corporation Ltd and the \n\n124 \n \nDirector of Shipping were in attendance. The matter was raised and flagged, including many other \nissues. Your concern has been addressed. Of course, there is still some room for improvement. \nWhat I will do is I will give you the outcome of the meeting. The Minutes are here, so, I will \nconvey them to you, okay? Thank you very much. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Dr. Aumeer! \n(6.18 p.m.) \nRUISSEAU DU POUCE & RIVULET PAILLES – FORTHCOMING RAINY SEASON – \nDREDGING WORKS \nDr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis Central): Thank you. \nMy question is addressed to the hon. Minister of National Infrastructure, to whom I have given \nadvanced notice earlier on. We are nearing the forthcoming rainy season. I would ask him if he \ncould liaise with the relevant authorities so that dredging works could be entertained along \nRuisseau du Pouce and Rivulet Pailles, which are the sites of overflooding and cause total harm to \nthe people who live around there. They are very concerned at the moment as to what would be \ndone as, unfortunately, since a year, no works have been done. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister! \nThe Minister of National Infrastructure (Mr G. Gunness): Thank you, hon. Member. \nConcerning the Ruisseau du Pouce, for the upgrading, we already have a consultant, Luxconsult \nLtd, which is doing the preliminary design report and which is going to be reviewed by the \nconsultant after obtaining views from the LDA. In the meantime, the Municipal Council has been \nasked to do the dredging, cleaning and desilting of all the rivers. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Beechook! \n(6.19 p.m.) \n \n\n125 \n \nPOSTE DE FLACQ & POSTE LAFAYETTE FISHERMEN – POLLUTION IMPACT – \nMEETING REQUEST \nMr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil): Merci, Madame la \nprésidente. My request is addressed to the hon. Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue \nEconomy and Fisheries. Following my question to hon. Bhagwan with regard to pollution and the \nimpact to the economic activities of the fishermen of Poste de Flacq and Poste Lafayette, may I \nrequest the Minister to, please, if possible, set up an appointment with the representatives of the \nfishermen to look into the matter? \nThe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries (Dr. A. Boolell): The hon. Member should know that I always entertain his legitimate requests. A meeting \ncan easily be fixed. We will meet those who feel aggrieved with pleasure.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Anyone? Very good!  \nThank you very much. The House is adjourned! \nAt 6.20 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 25 November 2025 at \n11.30 a.m. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n126 \n \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nAIR MAURITIUS LTD – LONDON GATWICK AIRPORT – MOVING \nOPERATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1004",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1004,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/1004) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in regard \nto radio-broadcast signal, he will state if persistent reception deficiencies thereof have been noted \nalong the coastal road from Grand Port to Quatre Soeurs in respect of Radio Plus, Top FM and \nother licensed radio broadcasters and, if so, indicate – \n(a) \nunder whose responsibility rests the obligation to ensure adequate radio signal \ncoverage thereat, and  \n\n141 \n \n(b) \nwhether measures are being envisaged to monitor, enforce or improve broadcast \nreception thereat and, if so, when same will be implemented.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGOVERNMENT TELEPHONE DIRECTORY – HARD COPY ISSUE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1005",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1005,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/1005) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, \nin regard to the Government Telephone Directory, he will state if consideration will be given for \nthe issue of hard copies thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed that in line with the Government Programme 2025–2029 and the \nDigital Transformation Blueprint launched by the Ministry of Information Technology, \nCommunication and Innovation, efforts are being made to promote the reduction of printing and \nto encourage a transition towards a paperless environment. \nMoreover, the Government Directory is available on the Government Portal, hosted at the \nGovernment Online Centre, which is the Data Centre of the Government. \n \nCWA – HOTLINE 170 – COMPLAINTS & SERVICE PERFORMANCE LEVEL",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1006",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1006,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/1006) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked \nthe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to Hotline 170, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to – \n(a) \nthe number of complaints received through same over the past two years from \ncustomers of Constituency No. 18, indicating the number of resolved and pending \ncomplaints, indicating the main categories thereof;  \n(b) \nwhether it operates on a 24-hour basis;  \n(c) \nthe number of staff assigned thereto, and  \n(d) \nthe average response time or service performance level thereof recorded over the past \ntwo years.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n\n142 \n \nILLEGAL RALLIES & MOTOR RACING – LEGAL FRAMEWORK – CAR RALLY \nTRACK CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1007",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1007,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/1007) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the illegal rallies and motor racing occurring \nin public places and along public roads, he will state if his Ministry is considering – \n(a) \nsetting up a legal framework therefor with a view to reducing risks of accidents, and  \n(b) \nconstructing a car rally track for the promotion thereof and, if so, when and, if not, \nwhy not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSYNTHETIC DRUGS – DRUG USERS SURVEY (2019 TO 2024)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1008",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1008,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1008) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the high prevalence of synthetic \ndrug addiction across the island, he will state – \n(a) \nthe number of synthetic drug users having, from 2019 to 2024 –  \n(i)  \nsought hospital care;  \n(ii)  passed away as a result of overdose linked to synthetic drug use, and  \n(b)  whether his Ministry will consider commissioning a biennial or triennial behavioural \nand biological research survey specifically on synthetic drug use among different age \ngroups with a gender-based approach as well as a more regular sentinel survey on this \nspecific population.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nNTC – STAFF UNIFORMS PROCUREMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1009",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1009,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/1009) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the procurement of uniforms to the staff \nmembers, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Transport Corporation, \ninformation as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n\n143 \n \nRIVIÈRE DES CREOLES-NOUVELLE FRANCE –FLOODING MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1010",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1010,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/1010) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the coastal region of Rivière des \nCréoles to Nouvelle France, classified red zones in terms of flooding, he will state the emergency \nmeasures, if any, taken by his Ministry ahead of the forthcoming rainy season.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFREE BUS TRANSPORT SCHEME – SUBSIDIES POLICIES & CRITERIA",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1011",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1011,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/1011) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Free Bus Transport Scheme for elderly \ncitizens, disabled individuals and students and subsidies on diesel provided to bus transport \noperators, he will state whether the subsidies vary for different seater buses, route wise or capacity \nwise.",
      "answer": "Reply: According to information obtained from the National Land Transport Authority \n(NLTA), subsidies do not vary according to the seating capacity of buses for both neither – \n(i) \nfor the Free Travel Scheme in respect of elderly citizens, disabled individuals and \nstudents, nor  \n(ii) \nthe subsidies on diesel provided to bus operators.  \nPayment to bus operators under the Free Travel Scheme is, in fact, made according to an \nagreement signed in 2005, and tacitly renewed thereafter between the then Ministry of Land \nTransport and the respective bus companies and individual bus operators.  \nThe subsidy for diesel is made according to agreements signed between the then Ministry of \nLand Transport and the bus companies in 2004 and the individual bus operators in 2005, \nrespectively. The subsidy is based on – \n(i) \nthe difference between the actual price of diesel per litre and the base price of diesel \nas determined by government, and  \n(ii) \nthe estimated number of kilometres operated on a given route and a standard diesel \nconsumption rate per kilometre devised by the NLTA.  \n \n \n\n144 \n \n \nCAESAREAN BIRTHS – PREVALENCE & POLICY MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1012",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1012,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1012) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to women giving birth \nthrough Caesarean Section (CS), he will state the prevalence thereof in Mauritius, indicating the – \n(a)  age range concerned therewith and the ratio of birth by CS in both public and private \nhealth institutions, and  \n(b)  measures his Ministry proposes to take to address the issue along the recommendations \nof the World Health Organisation.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn)  \nPUBLIC HOSPITALS – MEDICAL BOARD EXAMINATIONS - STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1013",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1013,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1013) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked the \nMinister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the proposal formerly made for the conduct \nin public hospitals of medical examinations by the medical practitioners of the Medical Board \nDepartment of the Ministry of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity to assess \neligibility for various benefits, he will state where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nTAXI OPERATORS WELFARE FUND – CONTRIBUTIONS COLLECTED & \nDISBURSED – POLICY REVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1014",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1014,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/1014) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Taxi Operators Welfare Fund, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the amount of contributions \ncollected from taxi operators as at date, indicating the total amount disbursed \ntherefrom under each scheme and corresponding number of beneficiaries, and \n(b) \nstate whether a review of the regime regarding contribution thereto is being \nenvisaged and, if so, indicate where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nDIGITAL ACCESS – INTEGRAL CITIZEN RIGHT – CONSTITUTIONAL \nAMENDMENT \n\n145",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1015",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1015,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/1015) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nInformation Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in regard to the proposed \nintroduction of Digital Access as an integral citizen right and the way forward, including the need \nfor a constitutional amendment, he will state where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nANGIOGRAM EXAMINATIONS/ANGIOGRAPHY PROCEDURE – WAITING LIST & \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1016",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1016,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1016) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to angiogram \nexaminations/angiography procedure, he will state the – \n(a) \nnumber of – \n(i) \npatients having undergone same at the Jawaharlal Nehru and Queen Victoria \n(Candos) hospitals, respectively since 2020 to 2025, indicating the number \nthereof on the waiting list therefor, and \n(ii) \nangiography machines available therefor, and \n(b) \nmeasures put in place to reduce waiting time therefor and facilitate same.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPARKED VEHICLES – NON-CLASSIFIED ROADS – COMPLAINTS & MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1017",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1017,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1017) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to vehicles parked on non-classified roads, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the local authorities, information as to the number \nof complaints received in relation thereto, indicating the – \n(a) \nspecial units in place dealing therewith, and  \n(a) \nadditional measures, if any, being envisaged in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Reply: The number of complaints registered by the Local Authorities with regard to \nvehicles parked on non-classified roads, for calendar year 2024 stood at 32 and for this year, 29 \ncomplaints have been registered as at date.  \nAccording to information submitted by the Police, for period January 2025 to 06 \nNovember 2025, 17 complaints for parking offences have been received, via the Citizen Support \nPortal. These complaints have been investigated and no breaches were found. \n\n146 \n \nAs regards part (a) of the question, no special units have been set up at the level of the \nLocal Authorities for this purpose as the complaints are referred to the Police of the locality.  \nThe Police has informed that Regular Mobile Patrols are being carried out by the Station \nPolice Personnel, Divisional Supporting Unit and Emergency Response Team, Bike Patrol and \nRoad Safety Unit personnel. \nAs to part (b) of the question, I am advised that appropriate road markings and signage by \nLocal Authorities and provision of double yellow lines by the Traffic Management and Road \nSafety Unit are being implemented, according to Regulations in force.  \nProposals are being studied to declare some sections of non-classified roads as no-parking \nzones with the appropriate road markings and signage.  Fines and other legal actions may then be \nimposed, in accordance with prevailing Regulations, so as to deter unauthorised parking of \nvehicles, accordingly. \nRegular awareness campaigns are being carried out by the Police to sensitise drivers and \nroad users. \nDuring Community Policing Forum, inhabitants are encouraged to come forward and report \nany breaches of the law, including vehicles causing obstruction on unclassified roads. \nSMEs – SUPPORT MEASURES & CHALLENGES ENCOUNTERED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1018",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1018,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives",
      "question": "(No. B/1018) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives whether, in regard to the Small \nand Medium Enterprises, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe number thereof registered as at date, indicating the amount of loans granted thereto; \n(b) \nwhether any assessment has been made of the obstacles with which they are faced, and \n(c) \nthe efforts being made to support them overcome trade barriers and expand \ninternationally.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUES – CHILDREN PROTECTION – REPORTED CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1019",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1019,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/1019) Ms R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of Gender \nEquality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to children protection, she will state the number \nof cases thereof referred by the Probation Services, the Family Welfare and Protection Unit and \nthe Child Development Unit in Rodrigues to the Office of the Ombudsperson for Children over \n\n147 \n \nthe past three calendar years, indicating whether the Ministry, in collaboration with the Rodrigues \nRegional Assembly, intends to establish a branch of the Ombudsperson’s Office in Rodrigues for \nimproved accessibility and responsiveness to child protection concerns on the island.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGOVERNMENT ABANDONED BUILDINGS – INVENTORY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1020",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1020,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/1020) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to Government abandoned buildings, he \nwill give the list thereof, indicating in each case – \n (a) the location and previous use thereof, and \n (b) whether a new project has been or will be earmarked for implementation therein.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed that according to information gathered, there are a number of \ngovernment buildings falling under the purview of different Ministries and departments that are \nno longer in use. The list of abandoned government buildings, with their location, the purpose for \nwhich they were used and the proposed projects for implementation therein is being placed at the \nLibrary of the National Assembly.  \nDiscussion and planning are held with the parent Ministries concerned with regard to future \nuse of those buildings. Whenever a Ministry identifies a potential new use or project of a particular \nbuilding, my Ministry provides full support for renovation, upgrading or redevelopment so that \nthe building can be put back into service in the most efficient way, subject to the required funds \nbeing made available by the Ministry or Department concerned.  \nPROJET DE RELANCE DU FOOTBALL – 2025-2030 – BUDGET – EXPECTED \nOUTCOMES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1021",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1021,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/1021) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked the \nMinister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the “Projet de Relance du Football” in \nMauritius, he will state the – \n(a) \nannual budget that is being proposed therefor over the next five years, giving details \nthereof; \n(b) \nexpected outcomes for men and women clubs and national teams, respectively and at \ngrass root level, and  \n\n148 \n \n(c) \nprojected financial and technical involvement of the Mauritius Football Association in \nthe implementation thereof.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/999) \n \nPOINTE DU DIABLE – VISITOR’S PARKING FACILITIES & SAFETY MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1022",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1022,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/1022) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to Pointe du Diable near Bambous-\nVirieux, he will state – \n(a) \nwhether consideration will be given for the provision of additional parking facilities \nfor visitors in view of the poor visibility along the main road thereat, and  \n(b) \nthe measures being envisaged to ensure safe access and proper traffic management \nthereat, particularly during weekends.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPOMPONETTE BEACH – PUBLIC BEACH – AMENITIES PROVISION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1023",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1023,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/1023) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in regard to the \nproposed declaration of the Pomponette Beach as public beach, he will state where matters stand, \nindicating whether the implementation thereof is being envisaged in this financial year and, if so, \nindicate whether provisions for amenities, including washrooms, parking facilities, food stalls and \nchildren area have been made.",
      "answer": "Reply: Part of Pas Geometriques (P.G) Bel Air of an extent of 14.1 Ha, located at \nPomponette, was proclaimed as public beach on 21 April 2025. \nI am informed by the Beach Authority that it will, after consultations with all stakeholders \nconcerned, including NGO “Aret Kokin Nou Laplaz”, hire a consultant in the next financial year \nfor the development of a Master Plan for the P.G Bel Air public beach, which would include, inter-\nalia, washrooms, parking areas, children area, benches, solar lighting and food stalls.  \nHowever, given the topography of the beach and its sensitive nature with the presence of \nvarious endemic plants, a controlled approach would have to be adopted as regards the provision \nof amenities thereat.  \n\n149 \n \nIn the meantime, the Beach Authority, in collaboration with Mauri Facilities Management \nCo Ltd, is carrying out regular cleaning of this beach, including grass cutting and lopping of \ndangerous branches. Provision is being made by my Ministry to contract out the cleaning of this \nbeach. \nFurthermore, the Beach Authority is making arrangements for the provision of 10 new bins, \nas well as the installation of 3 dangerous bathing panels thereat. \n \nROSE BELLE AREA HEALTH CENTRE – METHADONE DISTRIBUTION – \nRELOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1024",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1024,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1024) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the daily distribution of Methadone at \nthe Rose Belle Area Health Centre situated in a residential area and the risks to the safety of \ninhabitants and road users including women and school children, he will state if consideration will \nbe given for the advisability of relocating the distribution of Methadone to an alternative area.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCONGOMAH BRIDGE – RECONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1025",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1025,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/1025) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the Congomah Bridge, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether the reconstruction thereof is \nbeing envisaged and, if so, indicate the timeframe for the expected start and completion dates \nthereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nVISION 2050, 10-YEAR NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & NATIONAL \nPLANNING FRAMEWORK – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1026",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1026,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/1026) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to \nthe formulation of the Vision 2050 and corresponding 10-Year National Development Plan and \nthe National Planning Framework, she will state where matters stand, indicating the measures \nbeing envisaged to rebuild trust in public institutions and ensuring transparency and integrity.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n\n150 \n \nNON-MAURITIAN CITIZENS – WORK PERMITS & OCCUPATIONAL PERMITS – \nELIGIBILITY CRITERIA",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1027",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1027,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/1027) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked the \nMinister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to permits issued to non-Mauritian \ncitizens, he will state the – \n(a) \nnumber of Working Permits, Occupational Permits and Young Professional \nOccupation Permits issued and/or renewed and in force as at 31 October 2025, giving \ncomparative figures for the previous two years; \n(b) \ndistribution of permit holders by country of origin, economic sector, and \noccupational category, and \n(c) \neligibility criteria, assessment process and average processing time for each type of \npermit.",
      "answer": "Reply: The Employment Division which operates under the aegis of my Ministry issues \nWork Permits to foreign workers in line with the Non-Citizens (Employment Restriction) Act \n1970. On the other hand, Occupation Permits and Young Professional Occupation Permits are \nissued by the Economic Development Board under the Economic Development Board Act 2017 \nand the Immigration Act 2022. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, as at 31 October 2025, there were 47,680 expatriates \nholding a valid Work Permit as compared to 37,768 as at December 2023 and 48,004 as at \nDecember 2024. \nAs for Occupation Permits, I am informed that there were 5,049 holders of Occupation \nPermits, including 77 Young professionals for period ending 31 October 2025. As at 31 December \n2023, there were 3,403 holders of Occupation Permit including 44 Young Professionals and 5,019 \nOccupation Permit holders as at 31 December 2024 including 75 Young professionals. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, the required information is being placed in the Library \nof the National Assembly. \nI wish to inform the House that, as at 31 October 2025, 95% of the foreign workforce with \na valid Work Permit consisted of workers from India, Nepal, Madagascar, and Bangladesh.  \nApproximately 80% of the workers work in the Manufacturing and Construction sectors.  \nWork Permits issued cover some 4,541 different occupations. \n\n151 \n \nAs for the eligibility criteria, same would depend on the sectors of activity under which the \nWork Permit is being issued. In line with the recommendations of the Inter-Ministerial Committee \non Work Permit Issues, the principles of Permission in Principle, ratio and quota are no longer \napplicable. Employers have to show evidence of efforts made to recruit locally in the first instance \nby contacting the Employment Information Centres for list of eligible jobseekers and by posting \ntheir vacancies on the MauritiusJobs platform. If they are unable to recruit locally, they are \nprovided with a report to show evidence of inability to recruit which makes them eligible to employ \nforeign workers. \nFor Work Permit, the assessment process involves basic verification of the employer’s \nprofile and ensuring that conditions pertaining to the conditions of contract of employment and \nlodging arrangements are in line with existing legal provisions. New applications are assessed by \na Technical Committee on Work Permit prior to approval by my Ministry. With a view to \nstreamlining the assessment process, the Technical Committee, which was previously under the \nPrime Minister’s Office, has now been transferred to my Ministry as recommended in the Inter-\nMinisterial Committee Report. \nAs for Occupation Permits issued by the EDB, same are assessed by a Joint Committee at \nthe level of the Prime Minister’s Office. I am informed that for Occupation Permits, the average \nprocessing time is 23 working days as from the date of effective application, that is, from the date \nthe application is complete, while the average processing time for Work Permits is 22 working \ndays as from the date of payment of the application fee. \nA significant increase in the number of applications received has been noted this year and to \ncope with the increased workload, my Ministry has taken numerous measures to streamline \nprocedures. \nSince 01 September 2025, Work Permits are being issued electronically to employers, thus \neliminating the need to print and manually sign the Work Permits. \n Applications for Work Permits are now processed concurrently with applications for \nLodging and Accommodation Permits so as to save on processing time.  \nEnhancements are being brought to the National Electronic Licensing System for faster \nprocessing of applications. \nFurthermore, in view of the substantial increase in the number of applications received, my \nMinistry has made a request for additional staff for processing the applications. The request has \n\n152 \n \nbeen approved and additional Management Support Officers are being posted to the Work Permit \nUnit of my Ministry. \nThe Prime Minister’s Office, the Economic Development Board and my Ministry are \nworking on a new system for the processing and grant of Work Permits, namely the Rules Based \nWork Permit System and this system is expected to further reduce the processing time for the issue \nof work permits by my Ministry. \n \nBEAU PLATEAU ROAD (GOODLANDS TO COTTAGE) – ROAD EXPANSION, \nPAVEMENTS & HANDRAILS INSTALLATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1028",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1028,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/1028) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked the \nMinister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the connecting road from Beau Plateau \nRoad from Goodlands to Cottage, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nwhether consideration is being given for the – \n(a)  widening thereof, in view of the number of accidents reported thereat and increasing \nvolume of vehicles plying thereat daily and, if so, indicate the expected start and \ncompletion dates thereof, and  \n(b)  installation of pavements and handrails thereat, including through compulsory land \nacquisition near residential zones if deemed necessary to ensure the safety of \npedestrians.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPALMA – ST MARIE COLLEGE – REAR ACCESS REQUEST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1029",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1029,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/1029) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked \nthe Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to St Marie College, Palma, he will state if \nhis Ministry is in presence of a request for the opening of a rear access to the said College that \nwould open on State land, with a view to alleviating traffic congestion currently prevailing on \nLaseringue Avenue during school days and, if so, indicate whether consideration will be given to \ngranting such access on State land.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPUBLIC EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS – HEALTH & SAFETY INSPECTIONS \n\n153",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1030",
      "sitting_id": "11-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-11",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1030,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms",
      "question": "(No. B/1030) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked the \nMinister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms whether, in regard to the public \neducational institutions, he will state, since 2020 to date, on a yearly basis and in each educational \nzone, the number of health and safety inspections carried out thereat, and – \n(a) \ntable the detailed breakdown of the number and nature of the discrepancies observed \nduring same, categorised by educational zone and by each year, and \n(b) \nstate the remedial actions taken by the Ministry in respect of the identified \ndiscrepancies to ensure the safety and health of all students and personnel thereat, \nbroken down by educational zone and by each year.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-11-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1031",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1031,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1031) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the threat to national security posed by the suspension of the social media platforms \non 01 November 2024 in Mauritius, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information \nas to the – \n(a) \nreasons for the said suspension and under whose directives same was carried out, \nand  \n(b) \nestimated economic and social impacts thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, on 31 October 2024, on the night of Diwali, \nwhilst the whole nation was celebrating the victory of light over darkness, the then \nGovernment took a totally irrational decision which left the country in a state of dismay and \ndarkness. That decision was taken just a few days before the 2024 general elections.  \nOn that very day, the then Secretary to Cabinet and Head of the Civil Service, Mr \nPremode Neerunjun, informed the Officer-in-Charge of the Information and Communication \nTechnologies Authority that following a report from the then Deputy Director General of the \nNational Security Service, Mr Hurrydeo Ramdany, that letter was dated 31 October 2024, that \nthe national security and law and order situation in Mauritius could be jeopardised following \nthe posts and publications and broadcast on social media of alleged telephone conversations \nof certain political figures from the previous regime and their close associates. According to \nthe then Secretary to Cabinet and Head of the Civil Service these conversations “allegedly \nrepresented a threat to national security of Mauritius” and was likely to seriously destabilise \nthe information as well as the fundamental Constitutional, Economic, Social structures of \nMauritius. In order to prevent any breakdown of public safety and public order as well as to \nmaintain law and order in the country, the then Intelligence and Security Coordination \nCommittee had recommended that appropriate and immediate measures be taken.   \nIt must be pointed out that the previous Government had completely disregarded the \nviews and advice of the then National Security Adviser from India. The then Secretary to \nCabinet and Head of the Civil Service, thus directed the Officer-in-Charge of ICTA to take \nappropriate action for the curtailing of the social media platform totally until the 11 of \n\n30 \n \nNovember 2024, that is, on the very date of the proclamation of the results of the general \nelections which they thought they were going to win.   \nMadam Speaker, I wish to remind the House that the leaked information which was \nbroadcast on the social media was extremely damning against the previous regime, especially \non the eve of the general elections. Day after day, the recordings garnered widespread \nattention among the public, which was then in shock and awe at their contents.  \nConsequently, the Board of ICTA, under the chair of Mr Dick Ng Sui Wa, hastily \ndirected all internet service providers to temporarily suspend access to all social media \nplatforms until 11 November 2024 in pursuance of section 18(1)(a) of the Information and \nCommunication Technologies Act of 2001. \nIt is in those circumstances that on 01 November 2024, the whole nation woke up to the \nshocking news that the then Government had taken the decision to ban social media and \nreduce internet speed. This unprecedented decision by a regime which was “en nette perte de \nvitesse,” had been taken without the slightest consideration for people who depended on the \ninternet to do their work, and school children who also followed tutorials on the Internet \nduring the exams period and more importantly without measuring the impact it would have \non the economy of the country. They couldn’t care less. The decision was in fact a political \nploy hatched at the highest political level to save their skin. They thought they could save \ntheir skin against an impending debacle, classic to what happens in certain rogue states and \nunder despots.  \nMadam Speaker, the level of public outcry against this decision through all walks of \nlife was unimaginable.   \nClearly, the previous regime had pressed its auto-destruction button. You know what \nthey say – “Jupiter rend fou ceux qu’il veut detruire!”  \n \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, Madam Speaker, I am informed that the adverse \neconomic and social impacts of the suspension of the social media platforms have been \ntremendous and devastating. It has generated considerable economic and social disruptions, \nincluding – \n(i) \nloss of revenue for businesses that rely on online advertising or digital sales; \n\n31 \n \n(ii) \ndisruption of SME operations, particularly those using social media as their \nprimary marketing channel, and \n(iii) negative impact on businessmen and the BPO sector who are totally dependent on \nthe internet for their work. \nMore importantly, Madam Speaker, the reputational damage inflicted on our country as \na place where the rule of law and freedom of expression prevail and a haven for tourism and \nbusiness, was universally acknowledged. \nMadam Speaker, I want to reassure the House that my Government will never ever \nallow any such despicable decision against the nation’s interest and which curtail \nfundamental liberties. As I have indicated on many occasions, my Government also stands \ncommitted to upholding the fundamental right to freedom of expression, while also ensuring \nthat this right is exercised responsibly.   \nFurthermore, I wish to inform the House that the whole matter is still being \ninvestigated. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister! \nYes, supplementary! \nMr Jhummun: From what I understand, there will be a full enquiry on all these issues \nand can the enquiry be even undertaken upon the leaked information and all the posts that \nthey tried to block on the eve of the election? Can we have a full-fledged enquiry on all these \nissues? \nThe Prime Minister: All these posts had been secured, Madam Speaker, and also, \nthere will be a full-fledged enquiry. It has started, but it is going to continue for a while. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nYes, hon. Babajee, First Member for Savanne and Black River! \nPLEASURE CRAFT PPC 7380 OL 10 – DISAPPEARANCE FROM RIU HOTEL – \nINQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1032",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1032,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1032) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) to asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to pleasure \n\n32 \n \ncraft PPC 7380 OL 10 which disappeared from in front the RIU Hotel on 9 November 2025 \nand found in a basin at Les Salines on 11 November 2025, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to – \n(a)  whether it is suspected of having travelled to Reunion Island;  \n(b)  the number of officers posted at Rivière Noire Coast Guard Post, indicating since \nwhen and whether they visioned the hotel cameras, effected any arrest and \ninformed the ADSU, and  \n(c)  whether the inquiry will be entrusted to a new team of investigators.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat on Tuesday 11 November 2025 at 12.45 hours, one Mr B. J. S., a Belgian national \nresiding at La Gaulette, reported the disappearance of his pleasure craft, bearing number PPC \n7380 OL 10, which had been berthed and moored in the lagoon in front of the Lux Hotel, Le \nMorne, at the Black River National Coast Guard Police Post. \nAn enquiry was opened and on the same day, following information obtained, officers \nof the National Coast Guard and the CID proceeded to the Petite Rivière Noire salt pan, in the \nex-shipyard basin, where the pleasure craft was found. It was unattended. \nA search was also carried out in the vicinity of the region and 15 jerry cans of motor \nspirit, hidden among mangrove vegetation was also discovered about 50 metres from the \ncraft. The CID, Scene of Crime Office (SOCO) and FSL personnel were called to the locus \nfor examination and both the craft and the jerry cans which were secured.  \nMadam Speaker, in regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the \nCommissioner of Police that the enquiry is ongoing and the Police is exploring all avenues, \nincluding the possibility that the pleasure craft may have been used to travel to Réunion \nIsland or other neighbouring islands. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, 31 Police Officers are posted at the Black River \nNational Coast Guard Police as at 20 November 2025. It includes – \n(i) \nOne Assistant Superintendent of Police, \n(ii) \n9 Police Sergeants; \n(iii) 19 Police Constables, and \n\n33 \n \n(iv) 2 Temporary Police Constables. \nI am also informed that in the course of the enquiry, officers have viewed the CCTV \nfootage at Lux Hotel. No arrest has been effected so far. The Anti-Drug and Smuggling Unit \n(ADSU) has also been informed of the present enquiry and has started intelligence gathering, \ngiven the nature of the items recovered. \nWith regard to part (c) of the question, I am further informed by the Commissioner of \nPolice that it is not envisaged at this point, to entrust the enquiry to a new team of \ninvestigators. But this might have to happen later. \nSince the hon. Member has made mention of the Mauritius–Reunion axis, I wish to \ninform the House that a series of reinforced measures are being implemented to counter illicit \nactivities including drug trafficking activities, particularly along the Mauritius–Reunion axis. \nCooperation with Réunion authorities is ongoing and is being strengthened through the \nGroupe de Contact sur la Sécurité, which facilitates, inter alia – \n(a) \nreal-time intelligence sharing between the ADSU and L’antenne de l’office anti-\nstupéfiants (OFAST) for drug trafficking operations; \n(b) \ncoordinated maritime surveillance between the National Coast Guard and the \nForces armées dans la Zone-sud de l'océan Indien (FAZOI); \n(c) \ninformation sharing and capacity building between the MRA and La direction \ngénérale des douanes et droits indirects to counter illicit trafficking, and  \n(d) \njudicial corporation between the Attorney General’s Office and le Bureau du \nProcureur Général de la Réunion.  \nThese efforts are further supported under the EU funded Safe Seas Africa initiative, \nwhich enhances maritime domain awareness and inter-agency cooperation through the \ntripartite regional maritime intelligence sharing between the Regional Maritime Information \nFusion Centre (RMIFC) in Madagascar, the Regional Coordination Operations Centre \n(RCOC) in Seychelles, as well as the Operation Room of the National Coast Guard. \nMadam Speaker, following the State visit of President Emmanuel Macron, it was \ndecided to enhance the cooperation between our two nations in the fight against transnational \norganised crime, in particular Narco Trafficking, in the Indian Ocean. The Police will also \nbenefit from new capacity building opportunities through the Indian Ocean Academy.  \n\n34 \n \nThese measures and new corporation avenues will significantly strengthen monitoring, \nimprove enforcement capacity, and deter illicit maritime activities within our territorial \nwaters. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nYes, Mr Babajee. \nMr Babajee: Will the hon. Prime Minister enlighten the House regarding the place he \nmentioned – Les Salines lagoon, that land was leased to someone who is now jailed in \nReunion Island and that the boat was kept in the same place for two days? Also, how come \nthose officers did not know the boat was captured over there? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Prime Minister. \nThe Prime Minister: It is a good question. I will have to ask the Commissioner of \nPolice, but, in fact, they did not know. They were tipped-off about the boat being there.  \nMadam Speaker: It should be okay. Yes, the Fourth hon. Member for Rodrigues, Mr \nEdouard.  \nMR L.R. & MS A.M.R. CIVIL MARRIAGE – VISA APPLICATION – REFUSAL",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1033",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1033,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1033) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the visa application \nsubmitted by one Mr. L.R. in favour of one Ms. A.M.R., a Malagasy national, for the purpose \nof the celebration of their civil marriage in Mauritius, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Passport and Immigration Office, information as to the reasons for the refusal \nthereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Passport and Immigration \nOffice that, on 09 April 2025, Mr L.R., a citizen of Mauritius, aged 61 years, submitted an \napplication for an entry visa for the purpose of marriage on behalf of Ms A.M.R., a Malagasy \nnational, aged 42 years.  On 16 May 2025, the application was turned down in the absence of \nrelevant documents. \nOn 15 July 2025, Ms A.M.R. made an appeal to reconsider her application for visa. \n\n35 \n \nBy virtue of Section 19A(2)(a)(i) of the Civil Status Act, no marriage shall be \ncelebrated unless an entry visa has been issued to the non-citizen for the purpose of the \npublication of the intended marriage. \nUnder Section 19A(2)(iii) (EA) and (EB) of the Civil Status Act, a non-citizen \nintending to get married to a Mauritian has to submit the following documents –  \n(i) \nan affidavit or any other legal document, duly sworn or affirmed by him/her \nbefore a Court of Law in his/her country of residence, attesting that he/she is in \ngainful employment or, alternatively, has sufficient means to maintain \nhimself/herself, and \n(ii) \nan affidavit or any other legal document, duly sworn or affirmed by him/her \nbefore a Court of Law in his/her country of residence, attesting the marital \nstatus of the person. \nThe policy is to grant entry visa for the purpose of marriage upon submission of the \ndocuments as provided under Section 19A of the Civil Status Act. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to point out that there have been several cases whereby non-\ncitizens have come to Mauritius for the purpose of marriage without the documents required \nunder Section 19A of the Civil Status Act.  Since they are not able to get married without \nthese documents, they request for extension of their visas and therefore, they remain in \nMauritius on visa for long periods of time.  This is why non-citizens applying for a visa for \nthe purpose of marrying a citizen, are requested to provide upfront the required documents \nunder Section 19A of the Civil Status Act. \nMs A.M.R. has therefore been requested to submit the documents required under \nSection 19A of the Civil Status Act.  As at date, she has not submitted any documents. \nI am informed that there have been instances, Madam Speaker, whereby non-citizens \nare getting married to citizens for the sole purpose of obtaining residence in Mauritius.  In \norder to address such issues, my Office is reviewing the Civil Status Act as well as the \nMauritius Citizenship Act and the Immigration Act for any consequential amendments. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nThe Table has been advised that PQ B/l034, which is the next one, will be replied by \nhon. Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations, PQ B/1040 will be replied by hon. Minister \n\n36 \n \nof Land Transport and PQ B/1047 will be replied by hon. Minister of Information \nTechnology, Communication and Innovation.  \nSo, now I think I should call the Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or, Mr \nEtwareea.  \nDEVELOPMENT BANK OF MAURITIUS LTD – MR D.A., COMMUNICATION \nADVISOR – APPOINTMENT DETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1034",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1034,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1034) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Southern African \nDevelopment Community Protocol on Employment and Labour, he will state if Mauritius has \nsigned and ratified same, indicating the benefits thereof for the country and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Reply (The Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations): The Southern African \nDevelopment Community (SADC) Protocol on Employment and Labour was developed to \naccelerate sustainable socio-economic development and contribute to poverty eradication in \nthe region. The Protocol specifically sought to advance the attainment of social justice and \ndecent work by promoting the harmonisation and setting of minimum labour standards in the \nSADC region, based on International Labour Standards. \nI am informed that in July 2014, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration \nand International Trade requested the views of my Ministry and our stand on the ratification \nof the Protocol.  \nMy Ministry expressed reservations on three Articles of the Protocol, namely – \n(a) \nArticle 5, as at that time, out of the four ILO Governance Conventions, Mauritius \nhad ratified only two, and \n(b) \nArticles 11 and 16, as Mauritius had not ratified ILO Conventions “C102 – Social \nSecurity (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1952 (No. 102)” and “C183 – \nMaternity Protection Convention, 2000 (No. 183),” respectively. \nMy Ministry also informed the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and \nInternational Trade that additional consultations were required with other stakeholders \nregarding six Articles of the Protocol.  \nAt the 34th Ordinary Meeting of the Summit of the Heads of State and Governments of \nthe Southern African Development Community (SADC), which was held in Zimbabwe in \nAugust 2014, in which Mauritius participated, the Summit signed several instruments, \nincluding the Protocol on Employment and Labour. \nHowever, due to some reservations, Mauritius deferred the signature of the Protocol on \nEmployment and Labour, pending further consultations thereon.  \n\n139 \n \nIt is to be noted that, on 13 June 2019, Mauritius subsequently ratified ILO Convention \n“C183 – Maternity Protection Convention, 2000 (No. 183)”. \nIn March 2020, during the SADC Committee of Ministers of Employment, Labour and \nSocial Partners discussions were held on the low status of ratification of the Protocol on \nEmployment and Labour adopted in 2014.  \nThe Committee of Ministers of Employment and Labour and Social Partners identified \nsome challenges in the Protocol adopted in 2014, including –  \n(a) \nthe substantive provisions of the current Protocol include extensive cross-\nreferencing with other international treaties, many of which have not been ratified \nby the SADC Member States, and \n(b) \nthe Protocol needed to be strengthened for it to better respond to emerging labour \nmarket challenges posed by rapid technological and demographic \ntransformations, among other factors. \nHowever, since Article 29(3) of the existing Protocol expressly provides that it can only \nbe amended when it has entered into force, it was not possible to amend the Protocol.  \nIn light of the above, the Committee of Ministers of Employment and Labour and \nSocial Partners approved the development of a new protocol. \nI am informed that the new SADC Protocol on Employment and Labour was approved \nand signed by a number of Member States at the 43rd Ordinary Summit of SADC Heads of \nState and Government held in August 2023. The new Protocol provides, amongst others, a \nstrategic regional co-operation framework on employment and labour-related matters to \nfacilitate the achievement of decent work for all.  \nIn the new Protocol, there are no binding obligations on SADC Member States to ratify \nany ILO Conventions, including the ILO Core and Governance Conventions. Therefore, \nMauritius' reservations to the SADC Protocol on Employment and Labour, adopted in 2014, \nwere not applicable for the new Protocol. \nNevertheless, the new Protocol has not yet been signed by Mauritius in view of a \nparticular reservation about Article 12(4) of the Protocol. Article 12(4) of the Protocol states \nthat – \n“State Parties shall co-operate on social security, including through multilateral and \nbilateral arrangements, and facilitate the acquisition and maintenance, including \npreservation or portability of accrued social security entitlements.”  \nThis provision explicitly applies to migrant workers, granting them the right to claim accrued \nsocial security benefits from the country or countries where they have been employed. The \n\n140 \n \nMinistry of Social Integration, Social Security, and National Solidarity (MSISSNS) informed \nthat this proposal in the new Protocol should be discussed in detail, as it may increase \nfinancial liability across all pension systems.  \nI am informed that the signature of Protocols with reservations is not allowed. \nMoreover, at this stage, it would not be possible to make any amendments to the new \nProtocol, as doing so would entail reopening negotiations even before the Protocol comes \ninto force. Presently, the new Protocol is not in force. However, once the new Protocol has \nentered into force, any Member State party to it may propose an amendment.  \n \nDRUGS & ALCOHOL DRIVING – LEGISLATIVE STRENGTHENING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1035",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1035,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1035) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether in regard to Mr D.A., \nCommunication Advisor at the Development Bank of Mauritius Ltd., he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain information as to his date and terms and conditions of appointment, \nincluding the remuneration and other benefits drawn, indicating the number of times he has \nbenefitted from increases thereof, further indicating the rationale thereof and who \nrecommended and approved same.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the DBM Ltd that Mr Deven \nAnnacootee was enlisted as a part-time “Service Provider for Media Monitoring” for an \ninitial period of six months from 01 January 2021 to 30 June 2021 against an all-inclusive \nmonthly payment of Rs25,000. \nThe contract of Mr Annacootee was subsequently renewed three times on the same \nterms and conditions, with the same monthly fee of Rs25,000 as follows – \n(i) \nFirst renewal was for a period of six months, from 01 July 2021 to 31 December \n2021; \n(ii) \nA second renewal for a period of one year, from 01 January 2022 to 31 December \n2022, and \n(iii) A third renewal for a period of one year, from 01 January 2023 to 31 December \n2023.  \nAt the end of December 2023, a new contract with revised terms was signed with Mr \nAnnacootee as part-time “Communication Consultant” for a period of one year from 01 \nJanuary 2024 to 31 December 2024 for an all-inclusive monthly fee of Rs35,000. \nThe initial contract and each subsequent contract renewal of Mr Annacootee were \napproved by the-then Board of the DBM Ltd upon the recommendation of Management. \n\n37 \n \nTotal payment effected to Mr Annacootee from January 2021 to October 2024 \namounted to Rs1,250,000 for Media Monitoring only. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nMr Etwareea: Can the hon. Prime Minister confirm that Mr Annacootee had a dual \nemployment; that is, while being employed at the DBM, he was also working at the Ministry \nof Fisheries? \nThe Prime Minister: Yes. It appears to be the case. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nNow, we have Second Member for Rodrigues.  \nPRB REPORT – FORTHCOMING PUBLICATION – RODRIGUES REGIONAL \nASSEMBLY CONSULTATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1036",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1036,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1036) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the forthcoming \npublication of the Pay Research Bureau Report, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to where matters stand, indicating whether consultations were carried out as \nexpected concerning the Rodrigues Regional Assembly.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Director of the Pay \nResearch Bureau that in line with established practice, the Bureau has had consultations with \nthe Rodrigues Regional Assembly as well as the Rodrigues Workers Federation in the context \nof the preparation of the next PRB Report.  Letters were sent to both the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly and the Federation requesting written proposals as well as their views and \nobservations on general conditions of service. \nMadam Speaker, as a matter of fact, in July 2023, the Rodrigues Regional Assembly \nwas requested to submit information related to the review exercise.  In August 2023, the \nManagement of Rodrigues Regional Assembly and Trade Unions in Rodrigues were \nrequested to submit their representations. \nThe Pay Research Bureau has conducted a first visit to Rodrigues in June 2024 \nwhereby the Director and the officer of the Bureau met the Management of the Rodrigues \nRegional Assembly, Unions and Federations to explain the approach and methodology that \nthe Bureau would adopt for the 2026 review exercise. \n\n38 \n \nThereafter, two additional visits were effected to Rodrigues from 02 to 04 April 2025 \nand from 06 to 12 April 2025, respectively, to hold consultations with relevant stakeholders. \nThe Pay Research Bureau also had meetings with individuals, who had expressed an interest \nto depone. \nMadam Speaker, it is opportune to note that at the request of one of the Federations, a \nmeeting was held with its affiliates in June 2025 at the Bureau to discuss certain outstanding \nissues pertaining to pay, grading structures and conditions of service. \nFurthermore, in July 2025, a delegation comprising the Island Chief Executive and \nofficers of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly had a meeting at the Bureau, where several \nissues in relation to Rodrigues, were discussed and cleared. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes. Are you alright, hon. François? \nThe hon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle, Mr Seeburn.  \nGRAND PORT-QUATRE SOEURS COASTAL ROAD – RADIO-BROADCAST \nSIGNAL – RECEPTION DEFICIENCIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1037",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1037,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1037) \nMr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose \nBelle) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to radio-broadcast signal, he will state if persistent reception deficiencies thereof have \nbeen noted along the coastal road from Grand Port to Quatre Soeurs in respect of Radio Plus, \nTop FM and other licensed radio broadcasters and, if so, indicate – \n(a)  under whose responsibility rests the obligation to ensure adequate radio-signal \ncoverage thereat, and  \n(b)  whether measures are being envisaged to monitor, enforce or improve broadcast \nreception thereat and, if so, when same will be implemented.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Chief Executive Officer \nof MultiCarrier (Mauritius) Ltd that intermittent FM Radio reception in certain parts of the \nsouth-east region of Mauritius is a long-standing issue. \nThis is due to the fact that certain regions, especially the coastal road in the south-east \nregion are mountainous and therefore, the topography of the terrains result in sporadic FM \nRadio reception. \n\n39 \n \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that the responsibility to ensure \nadequate radio and signal coverage rests with MultiCarrier (Mauritius) Ltd, a company \nestablished under section 28 of the Independent Broadcasting Authority Act. MCML acts as a \nmultiplex operator and is responsible for ensuring both terrestrial radio and television \ntransmission over the island of Mauritius, Rodrigues and Agaléga. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (b) of the question, MCML is aware of the situation \nand is considering the possibility of installing a new FM Station in the south-east region to \nimprove radio broadcast signal. MCML is in consultation with the Independent Broadcasting \nAuthority and the Information and Communication Technologies Authority and all FM Radio \noperators for the allocation of specific FM Radio broadcast frequencies for that region. \nI am also informed that at present, MCML is undertaking preliminary test on the FM \nbroadcast reception in the south-east region and the quality of FM reception in that region is \nexpected to improve within the first quarter of 2026. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. That should be alright.  \nThe hon. Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne Longue! \nMAURITIUS ENTRY VISA – MR B. R. S. (EL CAPO) ARREST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1038",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1038,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1038) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the entry visa to Mauritius, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nPassport and Immigration Office, information as to – \n(a) \nthe number of persons presently overstaying same, and \n(b) \nin the case of Mr B. R. S., also known as El Capo, the – \n(i) \ndate and reasons of the arrest thereof; \n(ii) \nverification, if any, carried out prior to the issue thereto of same; \n(iii) \nduration of the visa, and \n(iv) \nactions, if any, taken at the expiry thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I am answering to both \nB/1038 and B/1041 as they are connected.  \n\n40 \n \nWith regard to the number of persons presently overstaying their visas, I am informed \nby the Passport and Immigration Office that as at 22 November 2025, around 9,800 persons \nare overstaying in Mauritius. \nI am further informed that Mr B.R.S. is a French national born on 19 October 1994 in \nFrench Guyana and holds a French passport. He came to Mauritius on 30 May 2025 from \nReunion Island and it was his first visit to Mauritius. At the immigration counter, he informed \nthat he would stay in the country for a period of six days at a guesthouse in Mahebourg for \ntourism purposes.  \nSecurity checks and verifications carried out on the Interpol database on the same day \nrevealed nothing adverse on Mr B.R.S. and the latter was allowed to enter Mauritius for 15 \ndays. It is to be highlighted that French nationals do not require a visa prior to travelling to \nMauritius. \nOn 14 June 2025, date on which his visa expired, he neither left the country nor applied \nfor an extension of his stay. Since that date, he was being looked for by the Tracing and \nTracking Team of the Passport and Immigration Office. \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Police that, on 29 October 2025 at around 12:15 \nhrs, following information obtained by the Police, Mr B.R.S. and two other persons, namely \nMr J.P.S.E. and Mr J.F.I.G., who were in a private car, were intercepted at Royal Road, La \nSource, Central Flacq by CID Eastern Division. They were found to be in possession of \nsuspected drugs and other incriminating articles, including – \n(i) \nOne rifle without any label nor any serial number; \n(ii) \nOne black plastic wrapping containing a quantity of white powder suspected to \nbe cocaine on the right-side jacket of Mr B.R.S.; \n(iii) \nOne plastic parcel wrapping a quantity of white powder suspected to be cocaine \nin the car; \n(iv) \nOne knife sharpener; \n(v) \nOne – what they call a – “Rambo” knife from under the observer’s seat, and \n(vi) \nTwo black hoodies and one pair of black and red gloves. \nAll these items were secured by the Police and the three persons were arrested. Mr \nB.R.S. confessed his guilt. \n\n41 \n \nI am also informed by the Commissioner of Police that on the same day, that is, 29 \nOctober 2025, at 13:40 hrs, a case of “Sequestration’’, which occurred on 25 October 2025 at \naround 23:00 hrs at L’Espérance Trébuchet, was reported against Mr B.R.S. at Piton Police \nStation. \nOn 30 October, he was provisionally charged before District Court of Flacq for the \noffence of “Drug dealing to wit: Possession of Cocaine for the purpose of distribution and \nConspiracy to commit sequestration’’. He was remanded to Police cell. Mr B.R.S. appeared \nbefore the District Court of Flacq on 06 November, 13 November, and 20 November 2025. \nThe Police has objected to his release on bail and he has been remanded to Police cell until 27 \nNovember 2025 whereas the other two persons were released on bail on 20 November 2025. \nOn 02 November 2025, the National Central Bureau of INTERPOL in Mauritius sought \ninformation from the National Central Bureau of INTERPOL in France on Mr B.R.S. \nThereafter, on 04 November 2025, INTERPOL France issued a Red Notice against Mr \nB.R.S., who is wanted for – \n(i) \nDrug- related offences; \n(ii) \nParticipation in a criminal conspiracy with a view to preparing an offence \npunishable by 10 years imprisonment, and also \n(iii) \nMoney laundering. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that investigation by the Police is ongoing regarding all \nthe cases reported against Mr B.R.S. The enquiry will reveal whether there is any connection \nwith the recent cocaine seizure on the MV Alpha Bravery. \nBy virtue of the provisions of the Passport Regulations 1969, nationals of almost all \ncountries are granted visa on arrival after having satisfied immigration requirements and \nsecurity checks.   \nThis system has given rise to many, many persistent abuses as evidenced by the \nsignificant number of overstayers. My Government will take remedial actions to strengthen \nthe border control system by amending the legal and regulatory frameworks where necessary \nto prevent the occurrence of such abuses. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. A. Duval!  \nMr A. Duval: My first question, Madam Speaker. Given that this person has remained \nnearly four months on the territory without a valid visa and that he was publishing videos on \n\n42 \n \nsocial media, which, in fact, are being used to press charges against him – videos that tell \nabout his violent and unlawful activities. It puts into question, raises issues on the role of the \nField Intelligence Unit, which reports to the Prime Minister and the Commissioner of Police, \nand how for four months, such a violent individual convicted for murder and drug trafficking \ninternationally has been allowed to come and do that in front of social media. So, that is the \nfirst question. \nThe Prime Minister: This is why I said we have to review all these things. You just \nsaid murder and all this, but when they checked on the Interpol List, it was not there. That is \nthe problem! We have a deficient system, which we are going to look at and change because \nmany countries in the world are now using a new system. It might cost a little money, but it is \na new system where these individuals will not be able to come in. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. Yes, one more question! \nMr A. Duval: Yes, my second question, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Prime Minister \nclarify, given the exemption for visa requirements for people travelling from France, whether \nthe same checks are done for the travellers coming from a French territory as would be the \ncase for another traveller coming from a country where visa is required? Therefore, are the \nprocedures for background checks the same as in the case of this Mr El Capo? \nThe Prime Minister: To my understanding, it is. Whether it is being or not, I do not \nknow. But to my understanding, it is. It is the same check.  \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Babajee, do you have a question? No? Because your PQ was \nalso answered by the hon. Prime Minister. Let me proceed now.  \nB/1039, hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nMR A. C. & MR A. C. P. – REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS – ALLEGED SCAM",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1039",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1039,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1039) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \ninquiries initiated into the case of alleged scam by real estate developers Mr A. C. and Mr A. \nC. P., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police and the \nFinancial Crimes Commission, information as to where matters stand, indicating if notaries \npublic are suspected of being involved therein. \n\n43",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat on 28 March 2023, one Mr B. S. R. made a declaration to the Central CID to the fact that \n– \n\nIn November 2021, he decided to purchase a villa forming part of the “Iréva \nVillas”, a project of Areva Immobilier Ltd and represented by Mr A.C.P. as \nDirector; \n\nOn 24 November 2021, Mr B.S.R. signed a ‘Contrat de Reservation \nPreliminaire/Société Civile Immobilière d'attribution’ with Areva Immobilier \nLtd for an initial contract of around Rs8.2 million; \n\nOn 13 December 2021, a down-payment of Rs1.5 million was made; \n\nOn 17 February 2022, Mr B.S.R. paid a sum of Rs3.5 million; \n\nOn 07 December 2022, Mr. A. C. P. requested him to pay an additional sum of \nRs2.2 million over and above the agreed amount of Rs8.2 million. He refused to \npay the extra amount. He has served a mise-en-demeure to the Director of Areva \nImmobilier Ltd; \n\nHe has given this declaration as a measure of precaution as he intends to enter a \ncivil suit against the company. \nIn accordance with established procedures an enquiry is initiated even if a \nprecautionary measure has been given, whether the offence has been committed or not. \n Police started an enquiry on the matter. It has recorded statements from six persons, \nincluding Mr D.R., Notary and Mr C.P., Director of Iréva Villas, who denied the allegations \nlevelled against them, and they were allowed to go. The other four statements were from \nwitnesses. \n I must point out that despite the fact that a declaration was made to the Police on 28 \nMarch 2023, it was only on 13 May 2025, more than two years afterwards, that the case was \nforwarded for advice to the Office of the DPP. This even, there is a cloud, there is a nebula of \ncloud here – why did it take more than two years for the case to be forwarded to the DPP? \n On 22 May 2025, the Office of the DPP requested the Police to initiate further \ninvestigation. The Police is attending the request; has started the enquiry. \n\n44 \n \n I am also informed by the Commissioner of Police that the names of two Notaries \nPublic have been mentioned and that the enquiry is going on. \n I am informed that the FCC had received several complaints made by victims against \nthe owner of Venezis Property and owner of Areva Immobilier Ltd. Following which the \nlatter had initiated two investigations for money laundering with predicate offence of \nswindling occurring as from year 2022. An enquiry is ongoing on this matter as well. \n The hon. Member will appreciate that perhaps at this stage I cannot give further \ndetails. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente, ce genre d’escroqueries devient malheureusement \ntrop fréquent et font beaucoup trop de victimes mauriciennes de la diaspora mais aussi \nétrangère. Donc, le Premier ministre peut-il nous dire si des moyens seront mises en œuvre \npour prévenir des tels actes car il y beaucoup trop escrocs qui sévissent en toute impunité \ndans ce secteur ? \nThe Prime Minister: There is going to be a new Law Practitioners Bill that is coming \nup. We have to look at all these notaries as well. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nThe Prime Minister: The two of them are well known; I suppose you know who they \nare. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Last question, Time will be up. \nMr Quirin:  Merci, Madame la présidente. Même si des procès au civil, voire au pénal, \nsont engagés, les victimes ne retrouvent pas leur investissement. Donc, le Premier ministre \npeut-il voir avec le bureau de l’Attorney General pour que les lois soient amendées en \nexigeant, par exemple, des fortes garanties aux promoteurs, garanties qui peuvent \néventuellement servir à indemniser les victimes ? \nThe Prime Minister: I think, I will ask for the hon. Attorney General to look into this \nmatter. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, time is up.  \nNow, the Table has been advised, the following PQs have been withdrawn: B/1042, \nB/1045, B/1046, B/1047, B/1052, B/1055, and B/1061. \n\n45 \n \nNow, we got very little time left before we break for lunch. We can still start. Yes, let \nus start with question time. \nYes, everybody wants to break, right? No? \nQuestions! Hon. Babajee again. Vous avez enlevé ? Je n’ai pas eu le temps tellement ça \nva vite. \nAllez-vous allez me dire, hon. Chief Whip! \nBLACK RIVER DISTRICT – MARKETS – PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1040",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1040,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1040) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nproposed strengthening of the legislative and enforcement framework to address cases of \ndriving under the influence of drugs and alcohol, he will state where matters stand, indicating \nwhether Government intends to implement the announced measures, including the immediate \nimpounding of the vehicles and the suspension of the driving licences of the offenders \ninvolved therein.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMR B. R. S (EL CAPO) – ARREST – COCAINE SEIZURE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1041",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1041,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1041) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to one Mr B. R. S., \nalso known as El Capo, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner \nof Police, information as to the reasons for his recent arrest, indicating – \n(a) \nhis nationality, date of entry in Mauritius and from where, indicating the \nnumber of times he visited the country and nature of the visas issued thereto; \n(b) \nhis connections in Mauritius; \n(c) \nhis place of abode in Mauritius, and \n(d) \nwhether he is suspected of having any connection with the recent cocaine \nseizure on the MV Alpha Bravery.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/1038) \n\n141 \n \nCASINOS OF MAURITIUS – PROPOSED RESTRUCTURING – \nIMPLEMENTATION TIMEFRAME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1042",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1042,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1042) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the proposed restructuring of the Casinos of Mauritius, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to the expected timeframe for the implementation thereof, \ngiving details thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nUS DOLLAR LIQUIDITY – DOMESTIC MARKET – DEMAND & SUPPLY \nVOLUMES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1043",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1043,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1043) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to US Dollar liquidity on the domestic market, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain information as to the average daily volumes of demand and supply thereof over the \nperiod 01 October 2025 to date, indicating the measures taken to address any shortfall \nthereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: The Bank of Mauritius has taken several measures to address the inconsistency \nin the conduct of monetary policy that existed prior to November 2024 which led to a sharp \ndepreciation of the Rupee and a persistent foreign exchange shortage in the local market.   \nThese measures include – \n(a) \nraising the policy rate by 50 basis points to 4.5 per cent per annum in February \n2025; \n(b) \ninstructions to commercial banks to ensure that all dealings in foreign \nexchange, including swaps and other derivatives are effected through financial \ninstitutions duly licensed by the Bank; \n(c) \nstricter regulation of intercompany transactions in foreign currencies as well as \nswaps and other derivatives, and \n(d) \ninstructions to banks to ensure that forward transactions are priced in a fair \nmanner and in accordance with market fundamentals. \n\n142 \n \nThe reason behind these measures was to prevent a parallel market, which caused \ndistortions in pricing and drove forex inflows away from the official market. \nFurthermore, the regulatory arbitrage between the Financial Services Commission and \nthe Bank of Mauritius regarding the purchase and sale of forex by Treasury Management \nCompanies was discontinued.    \nThe Bank of Mauritius also has a monthly meeting with the Treasurers of banks \nthrough the Mauritius Financial Markets Committee to monitor the market situation.  \nIn addition to these measures, the Bank of Mauritius has intervened to supply forex in \nthe domestic market. From November 2024 up to 19 November 2025, the Bank has injected a \ntotal of USD 244 million. \nAt the level of Government, we have complemented these measures by imposing that at \nleast 85 percent of the proceeds from sales of villas under the Property Development Scheme \nshould be converted into rupees. \nFurthermore, as from this fiscal year, all businesses that receive at least 50% of their \nannual turnover in foreign currency are paying their tax in foreign currency.  The Tourist Fee \nof 3 Euro per night per tourist effective as from the 01st of October this year is also generating \nadditional foreign exchange for the country. \nI am informed by the Bank of Mauritius that the daily average volume of demand for \nforex in the local market during the period 01 October to 19 November 2025 was USD 29.6 \nmillion and the daily average volume of supply of forex amounted to USD 26.2 million. \nI am further informed that from the beginning of January 2025 to 19 November 2025, \ntotal forex supply to the market stood at USD 6.5 billion, that is, USD 1.1 billion above the \nlevel registered during the same period last year. This clearly shows an improvement in \nliquidity condition as a result of the measures taken since November 2024. \nI am informed that the Bank of Mauritius is monitoring the situation on the domestic \nforeign exchange market closely and appropriate actions will be taken as required to ensure \nan adequate supply of forex in the local market. \n \nMR M. H. DEATH – ROAD ACCIDENT – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1044",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1044,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1044) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the recent road \naccident in the course of which Mr M. H. lost his life, he will, for the benefit of the House, \n\n143 \n \nobtain from the Commissioner of Police, information of the outcome of the inquiry carried \nout thereinto.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that a serious road accident at \nCamp Levieux, involving a contract car and an autocycle, was reported at around 23 58 hours \non Friday 07 November 2025. \n I am also informed that the victim was found lying unconscious by the side of the \nroad and was bleeding profusely at his head. The Police immediately called the SAMU for \nmedical assistance. While being conveyed to the hospital, the victim passed away.  The \nmatter was referred to the Police Medical Officer for post-mortem examination, and the cause \nof death was attributed to Craniocerebral injuries. \n I am further informed by the Commissioner of Police that on the same night, an \nenquiry was initiated to identify the owner and the driver of the contract car. The Police \ninterviewed the owner of the car, who provided information on the driver who had hired the \ncar. \n The Police arrested the driver at around 13 45 hours on Saturday 08 November 2025. \nHis defence statement was recorded in the presence of his counsel at 15 00 hours at the Camp \nLevieux Police Station.  \n On the same day at 17 40 hours, the driver was required to undergo preliminary tests.  \nAn alcotest was carried out and was found to be negative.  A field impairment test was also \ncarried out and he failed the test.  Subsequently, the driver was required to undergo a saliva \ntest, which was found to be positive to intoxicating substance, warranting further in-depth \nanalysis. The driver was brought to Victoria Hospital, where his blood specimen was taken \nfor analysis by the Forensic Science Laboratory. The latter has submitted the report of the \nblood specimen to the Police on 24 November 2025.  \nThe driver was then detained at the Rose Hill Police Station pending his appearance \nbefore Weekend Court on Sunday 09 November 2025. The Police informed the Office of the \nDirector of Public Prosecutions that there is objection to release the driver on bail, without \ndwelling into the merits of the case. \n The driver was provisionally charged with the offence of involuntary homicide. He \nwas then released on parole with the condition to furnish a surety of Rs100,000 and to enter \ninto a recognizance in the amount of Rs300,000. \n I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that there are established procedures that \nPolice need to follow for the release of a person on bail.  It should seek the advice of the \n\n144 \n \nOffice of the Director of Public Prosecutions and provide all the relevant information on the \nfacts and circumstances of the case for a sound advice. \n In this present case, clearly certain facts were not communicated to the Office of the \nDirector of Public Prosecutions. \nIt was found in the course of the enquiry that – \n(a) \nthe driver was not the holder of a valid driving licence; \n(b) \nhe was suspected to have driven under the influence of intoxicating substance, \nand \n(c) \nhe failed to provide assistance to the victim at the time of the accident.  \n Subsequently, the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions advised the Police to \nlodge another provisional charge against the driver for the following offences – \n(a) \n‘Culpable Omission’ in breach of section 39 (A) of the Criminal Code Act; \n(b) \nDriving under the influence of intoxicating substance in breach of section 123 \n(E)(1)(c) of the Road Traffic Act, and \n(c) \nDriving without licence in breach of section 40(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Act. \nThe Police objected to the release of the driver on bail and he was remanded to Police \ncell. \n I am also informed by the Commissioner of Police that an inquiry into this matter is \nongoing. The inquiry will also look into the existing procedures regarding the release on bail \nfor suspects arrested in serious offences. \n On the basis of information provided to my Office and in the light of the Communique \nof the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, it is clear that the relevant information \nhave not been given to the Director of Public Prosecutions. \n I have given instructions to the Commissioner of Police that a thorough inquiry \nshould be carried out to find if there has been a dereliction of duty on the part of the officers \ndealing with the matter, and if so, appropriate disciplinary actions should be initiated \nforthwith. \nOLD GRAND PORT – CIVIL STATUS OFFICE – CLOSURE REASONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1045",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1045,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1045) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Civil \nStatus Office at Old Grand Port, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \n\n145 \n \nthe reasons for its closure, indicating since when it is closed and whether consideration will \nbe given for the reopening thereof to facilitate access to vital registration services for \nresidents of Grand Sable, Old Grand Port, Bambous Virieux and surrounding areas.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nLOANS – BANK CHARGES, FEES & COLLATERAL SECURITIES – REVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1046",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1046,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1046) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the bank charges, fees and collateral securities regarding loans granted by financial \ninstitutions, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Bank of Mauritius, \ninformation as to – \n (a) when same were last reviewed, and  \n(b)  whether consideration will be given to aligning same to international norms and \nstandards applicable in other jurisdictions.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nONLINE RISKS, HARMS, CYBERBULLYING & HARASSMENTS – VICTIMS’ \nSUICIDE – SAFETY REGULATOR",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1047",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1047,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1047) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to online risks, \nharms, cyberbullying and harassments and victims thereof attempting/committing suicide, he \nwill state whether consideration will be given for the – \n(a) \nestablishment of an independent online safety regulator with a highly qualified \ncommissioner at the head thereof, and \n(b) \nbanning of social media to those under 16 years old.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBEL AIR POLICE STATION – POLICE OFFICERS – STAFFING LEVEL & \nOPERATIONAL CAPACITY  \n\n146",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1048",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1048,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1048) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Bel \nAir Police Station, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of \nPolice, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of police officers on duty at one particular time thereat; \n(b) \nestimated number of inhabitants falling under the purview thereof, and \n(c) \nnumber of requests for assistance that remained unattended since January 2025 to \ndate due to understaffing and/or unavailability of police vehicles, indicating if \nremedial measures will be taken to address same.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that the Bel Air Rivière Sèche \nPolice Station falls under the Eastern Division, and is under the command of an Assistant \nCommissioner of Police. \nAs regards part (a) of the question, I am informed that the station has an effective \nstrength of 76 Police Officers of various ranks and at any given point in time, there is an \naverage of 17 Police Officers attached to the police station as they operate on a shift system \nbasis. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am further informed that the Bel Air Rivière \nSèche Police Station covers around 13 regions, representing a population of around 70,000 \ninhabitants. \nAs regards part (c) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that \nfrom January 2025 to 21 November 2025, there are no reported instances wherein requests \nfor police assistance remained unattended by the Bel Air Rivière Sèche Police Station due to \nunderstaffing or unavailability of police vehicles. \nI wish to inform the House that it has been a long-standing practice in the Mauritius \nPolice Force that whenever a police station is temporarily understaffed or its vehicles are \nengaged at a particular time, reinforcement is promptly sought from supporting units such as \nthe Emergency Response Service, the Divisional Support Unit and the National Coast Guard. \nFor this particular station, I am informed that additional support is also drawn from nearby \npolice stations such as Flacq, Trou d’Eau Douce and Belle Mare Police Stations to ensure \nuninterrupted service delivery. \nDISPOSABLE INCOME (MIDDLE-CLASS FAMILY) – INFLATION IMPACT \n\n147",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1049",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1049,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1049) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands, whether he will state the \nevolution of the disposable income available to the average middle-class Mauritian family \nduring the year 2025 having regard to the prevailing rate of inflation.",
      "answer": "Reply: Since coming into office in November 2024, Government has taken a number of \nmeasures to increase the purchasing power of the population.   \nThese include – \n(a) \nthe payment of a 14th month bonus and the 2025 salary compensation to \nemployees earning a basic monthly salary of up to Rs 50,000; \n(b) \nthe reduction in the price of diesel and mogas (l’essence) by Rs5 per litre in \nDecember 2024;  \n(c) \na further reduction in the price of mogas (l’essence) by Rs2.75 per litre in \nNovember 2025; \n(d) \nthe imposition of price controls and markup limits on key consumer goods;  \n(e) \nthe removal of VAT on a range of basic items such as frozen and canned \nvegetables, infant nutrition, and baby food; \n(f) \nthe setting up of a Price Stabilisation Fund of Rs10 billion for the next 5 years \nwith an initial contribution of Rs2 billion this year, leading to the reduction in the \nprices of five essential commodities, namely milk powder, processed cheese, \ninfant milk, baby diapers, and edible oil; \n(g) \nthe abolition of registration duty applicable on the sale and transfer of domestic \npre-owned vehicles, and \n(h) \nthe increase in the monthly tax exemption threshold for employees from \nRs390,000 to Rs500,000. Around 81% of employees are now exempt from \nincome tax. Some 75,000 individuals earning between Rs500,000 and Rs1 \nmillion are benefiting from reduced tax liabilities. \nAs a result of these measures, many households experienced an increase in their \nmonthly disposable income in 2025 surpassing the inflation rate, which remains within the \nBank of Mauritius’s target range. \nNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION – COMPOSITION & MEMBERS’ \nSELECTION PROCESS \n\n148",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1050",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1050,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1050) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the National \nHuman Rights Commission, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the \ncurrent composition thereof, indicating the selection process behind same and the basis on \nwhich the members are chosen.",
      "answer": "Reply: The National Human Rights Commission is established in accordance with \nsection 3 of the Protection of Human Rights Act. The National Human Rights Commission \nconsists of two divisions, namely – \n(i) \nthe Human Rights Division, and  \n(ii) \nthe National Preventive Mechanism Division. \nThe Commission shall consist of – \n(a) \na Chairperson, who shall be the Head of every Division, and \n(b) \ntwo Deputy Chairpersons, each of whom shall be assigned to a Division. \nPursuant to section 3(7) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, each Division shall \nconsist of – \n(i) \nthe Chairperson, as its head; \n(ii) \na Deputy Chairperson who shall be assigned to it, and \n(iii) two members with knowledge and experience in the relevant field. \nMoreover, pursuant to section 3(8) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, the \nChairperson, the Deputy Chairperson and the Members of every Division are appointed by \nthe President, acting on the advice of the Prime Minister, after consultation with the Leader \nof the Opposition. \nThe Protection of Human Rights Act further provides that the Chairperson should be a \nperson who has been – \n(i) \na Judge; \n(ii) \na Magistrate for not less than 10 years; \n(iii) a law practitioner for not less than 10 years; or \n\n149 \n \n(iv) a Magistrate and a law practitioner for an aggregate period of not less than 10 \nyears. \nThe Deputy Chairpersons shall be persons who have been law practitioners for not less \nthan five years. \nMembers of the Human Rights Division shall be persons having knowledge and \nexperience in the field of human rights, law, employment, industrial relations, business \nadministration, education, sociology, policing, social work, psychology, psychiatry, medicine \nor prison management. \nAs regards the National Preventive Mechanism Division, of the two Members, one \nmember shall be selected from a list of non-governmental organisations involved in social \nwork in prisons.  The other member shall be a person having knowledge and experience in \nthe field of human rights, law, employment, industrial relations, business administration, \neducation, sociology, policing, social work, psychology, psychiatry, medicine or prison \nmanagement. \nThe appointment of the Chairperson and Members of the National Human Rights \nCommission has been made on the basis of their qualifications and relevant experience in \naccordance with the provisions of the Protection of the Human Rights Act and National \nPreventive Mechanism Act. \nThe current composition of the National Human Rights Commission is as follows – \n \nChairperson \n: \nMr Satyajit Boolell, SC \n \nThe Human Rights Division \nDeputy Chairperson \n: \nMrs Melany Nagen \n \nMembers \n: \n(i) \nMrs Touria Prayag; and \n(ii) Mr Jean Marie Frank Richard \n \nThe National Preventive Mechanism Division \n \nDeputy Chairperson \n: \nMrs Najah Abdulla Ahmed \n \nMembers \n: \n(i) Mr Vijay Ramanjooloo; and \n(ii) Mr Joseph Gabriel Vieillesse \n \n \n\n150 \n \nOUTER ISLANDS – PATIENTS’ EMERGENCY MEDICAL EVACUATIONS – \nMEDICAL AIRCRAFT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1051",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1051,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1051) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Outer Islands, \nincluding Rodrigues and Agalega, he will state if consideration will be given for the \nacquisition, leasing or provision of dedicated access to medical aircrafts equipped for \nemergency medical evacuations of patients therefrom to avert delays currently arising due to \nunavailability of seats on Air Mauritius flights and inadequacy of commercial aircrafts \ntherefor.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed that at present when a patient in Rodrigues requires treatment or \ndiagnostic procedures which are not available locally, the attending Specialist recommends \ntransfer for treatment in Mauritius. The Health Director submits the relevant request to Air \nMauritius for arranging the necessary seating or stretcher booking for the patient. \nThe Mauritius-Rodrigues route is operated exclusively by Air Mauritius’ ATR72 fleet, \ncomprising three ATR72-600 and one ATR72-500, with a commercial seat limit of 64 per \nflight. The airline runs five daily flights, increasing to as many as ten during peak periods.  \nThese aircraft are equipped to cater for stretcher and oxygen-dependent medical cases. \nI am informed by Air Mauritius that patients requiring medical evacuation are \nsystematically given priorities over regular passengers. This priority also extends to the \npatient’s travel companion and medical staff.  From November 2024 to October 2025, Air \nMauritius has transferred 268 patients requiring stretcher and/or oxygen facilities. \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Police that the Maritime Air Squadron (MAS) \nof the National Coast Guard operates three Dornier Aircraft for search and rescue and \nmaritime surveillance.  In addition, when no commercial flights for Rodrigues are available \nfor urgent medical evacuation, the Dornier aircraft can be quickly configured to transport \npatients and medical staff and is equipped with stretchers, oxygen cylinders and other \nessential medical equipment. From January 2025 to 20 November 2025, 2 medical \nevacuations from Rodrigues have been carried out by the Dornier Aircraft. \nWith regard to Agalega, I am informed that emergency medical evacuations are \nundertaken exclusively by the Dornier Aircraft of the National Coast Guard, which is \nmobilised specifically for urgent medical transfers. I am informed by the Outer Islands \nDevelopment Corporation that, in such cases, the resident doctor determines the urgency of \nthe medical evacuation based on the severity of the medical condition of the patient. The \n\n151 \n \nrequest also specifies whether a medical team and equipment such as stretcher and/or oxygen \ncylinder are required on board. \nAccordingly, upon the recommendation of the resident doctor, the Ministry of Health \nand Wellness arranges the medical evacuation of the patient via the Dornier. From January \n2025 to 20 November 2025, 20 medical evacuations have been carried out by the Dornier \nAircraft. \nIn view of the arrangements already in place, including the priority given to medical \ncases on Air Mauritius flights and the availability of the Dornier Aircraft for urgent \nevacuation, the existing system continues to provide timely assistance to patients from the \nouter islands. The Dornier fleet remains an important support for emergency medical \ntransfers. However, should the need arise in the future, the option of a dedicated medical \naircraft may be considered. \nROAD ACCIDENTS – DRIVERS UNDER INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL/ILLEGAL \nSUBSTANCES – FATALITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1052",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1052,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1052) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port-Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to road traffic accidents, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the number of reported cases thereof wherein \ndrivers involved therein were found to be driving under the influence of alcohol or illegal \ndrugs/substances and/or without holding valid driving licences over the past three years, \nindicating the number of – \n(a) \nfatalities that ensued, and \n(b) \nvehicles involved that were rented as contract cars and those which were rented \nillegally",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFATAL ROAD ACCIDENTS – DRUGS/ALCOHOL OFFENCES – CASES \nREPORTED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1053",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1053,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1053) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port-Louis Maritime & Port-Louis \nEast) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to fatal road accidents in which drivers involved are found to have been driving under \nthe influence of drugs or alcohol and/or without holding valid driving licences, he will – \n\n152 \n \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information \nas to the number of cases thereof since January 2025 to date, and \n(b) \nstate whether consideration will be given for amendments to be brought to the \nlegislation to provide for severer punishments of the offenders in such cases.",
      "answer": "Reply: With regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of \nPolice that from 01 January 2025 to 20 November 2025, the number of fatal road accidents \ndue to driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol or without holding valid driving \nlicences, reported to the Police are as follows – \n(a) \n4 accidents concern drivers tested positive for alcohol; \n(b) \n4 accidents concern drivers tested positive for drugs or intoxicating substances, \nand  \n(c) \n4 accidents concern drivers who were also driving without a licence.  \nAll these cases are still under investigation. \nRegarding part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Ministry of Land Transport \nthat the Penalty Points System will be introduced in January 2026. This will aim at imposing \nstricter penalties on offenders for reckless and irresponsible behaviour, as well as drink/drug \ndriving. Also, the system of issuance of driving licences is being modernised to introduce QR \ncodes and other technological features to detect drivers using fake driving licences. \nI am further informed by the Commissioner of Police that an amendment to the Road \nTraffic Act to introduce “Motor Manslaughter” with regard to serious and aggravating road \ntraffic offences, is being considered.  Such an offence would be invoked when a driver shows \na serious disregard for the safety of other road users, including actions like excessive \nspeeding, driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or any conduct that demonstrates a \nwilful neglect of safety. Upon conviction, individuals could face severe criminal penalties, \nsuch as mandatory imprisonment, long-term licence disqualification and compulsory \nrehabilitation programmes. \nUNAUTHORISED ONLINE MONEY WITHDRAWAL – LOCAL BANKS \nCUSTOMERS – REPORTED CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1054",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1054,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1054) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port-Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the unauthorised online withdrawal of money from the accounts of customers of \nlocal banks, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Cybercrime Unit of the \n\n153 \n \nMauritius Police Force, information as to the  reported number of cases thereof over the past \nthree years, indicating the – \n(a) \nbanks concerned therewith; \n(b) \noutcome of inquiries carried out in relation to the responsibility of the banks \npursuant to section 51 of the Banking Act, and \n(c) \nnumber of prosecutions carried out and convictions secured, if any.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTIONS – EMPLOYEES & PERSONNEL – HEALTH & \nSAFETY SITE INSPECTIONS & TRAININGS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1055",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1055,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1055) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Black River District, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe number of markets in operation thereat, if any, and \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given for the – \n(i) \nconstruction of a new market on the west coast and issue permits in relation \nthereto, and \n(ii) \nsearch for a private partnership to start the operation of a temporary market \non Saturdays or Sundays thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCWA HOTLINE 170 – CONSTITUENCY NO. 18 – COMPLAINTS & \nPERFORMANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1056",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1056,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/1056) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to Hotline 170, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to – \n(a) \nthe number of complaints received through same over the past two years from \ncustomers of Constituency No. 18, indicating the number of resolved and pending \ncomplaints, indicating the main categories thereof; \n(b) \nwhether it operates on a 24-hour basis; \n(c) \nthe number of staff assigned thereto, and \n(d) \nthe average response time or service performance level thereof recorded over the \npast two years. \n\n46",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, avec votre permission je dépose des \ninformations sur le nombre de plaintes reçues, celles résolues, celles en attente ainsi que les \nprincipales catégories de plaintes reçues au cours des deux dernières années de la part des \nconsommateurs de la CWA pour la circonscription numéro 18. \nConcernant la partie (b) de la question, j’ai appris que la ligne d’assistance 170 \nfonctionnait auparavant 24/7. Cependant, ces horaires d’ouverture ont été modifiés et sont \ndésormais de 5 heures, le matin, à 23 heures à compter du 1 septembre 2022. \nNéanmoins, en période de forte affluence et pendant les fêtes, la ligne d’assistance 170 \nreste ouverte 24/7 compte tenu du volume d’appels. \nConcernant la partie (c) de la question, j’appris que la hotline 170 est gérée en interne \npar la CWA qui compte actuellement 15 employés. L’équipe comprend à un coordinateur des \nrelations publiques et de la communication, deux chefs d’équipe et 12 agents de service \nclientèle. Face à une charge de travail croissante, la hotline 170 s’appuis fortement sur ces 14 \nemployés à temps partiel et aussi qui travaillent par roster de 5 heures le matin à 9 heures à \ndomicile et de 16 heures à 21 heures afin d’assurer le fonctionnement quotidien et de traiter \nles demandes des clients. \nMalgré ce dispositif, le service expérience client restant au sous-effectif par rapport au \nnombre d’appels reçus notamment en cas de coupure d’eau majeure ou de problèmes \nd’approvisionnement en eau régionaux. \nMadame la présidente, concernant la partie (d) de la question, j’ai appris que les \nréclamations sont traitées par les équipes d’exploitations des six zones de distribution d’eau. \nDonc, nous avons six zones. Ces équipes sont également confrontées à un manque de \nmatériel et de personnel pour effectuer des réparations, les raccordements à domicile et les \nautres interventions. \nIl convient de préciser que le réseau de la CWA est ancien et présente des défaillances \ndans plusieurs régions ce qui le rend sujet aux ruptures des tuyaux. Selon la complexité de la \nréclamation, le délai de réponse moyen de deux à trois jours. Ce délai peut être plus long dans \ncertains cas notamment, si des travaux importants sont nécessaires ou en cas d’indisponibilité \nde l’entrepreneur. J’ai également appris que la CWA a approuvé un système de roster révisé \nassurant ainsi la disponibilité de la ligne d’assistance 170 désormais 24/7. \nCe système mobilisera un effectif total de 33 personnes qui permettra de se passer du \npersonnel à temps partiel – donc on va recruter, on recrute actuellement 33 personnes pour \n\n47 \n \ntravailler – et sera renforcé par des équipes administratives chargées du suivi des \nréclamations jusqu’à leurs résolutions. \nMs Anquetil : Madame la présidente, s’il vous plaît ! \nMadam Speaker : Yes ! \nMs Anquetil : Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Je remercie l’honorable \nministre pour sa réponse. Le ministre peut-il indiquer à la Chambre s’il trouve acceptable que \nla hotline 170 censée assister la population que la majorité des plaintes ne demeurent ni \ntraitée, ni suivie, ni même accompagnée d’un retour aux usagers et le personnel ne s’adresse \npas correctement au public. Peut-il également préciser si lui-même, le ministre responsable de \nla CWA, est satisfait de la performance de ce service ? Je vous remercie, Madame la \nprésidente. \nMr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, je remercie l’honorable membre pour sa \nquestion. Je dois souligner, Madame la présidente, que je ne suis nullement satisfait \npersonnellement des performances du hotline 170 de la CWA. \nJe suis pleinement conscient des nombreuses difficultés auxquelles le public est \nconfronté notamment, par le manque de réactivité exactement, comme l’a si bien dit \nl’honorable membre, de ce service face à la détresse des abonnés qui subissent des situations \nde water stress. \nJe peux d’ailleurs témoigner que j’ai personnellement téléphoné sur le 170 et j’ai appris \nplus tard que l’honorable Deputy Prime Minister, le DPM, a aussi téléphoné sur ce hotline et \nje peux dire que le DPM a eu plus de chance que moi. \nQuand moi j’ai appelé, puisque moi quand j’ai appelé le 170, Madame la présidente, \nafin d’évaluer le fonctionnement du service, j’ai pu constater les mêmes problèmes que ceux \nrapportés par nos concitoyens. \nJ’ai précisément pour cette raison, c’est précisément pour cette raison, Madame la \nprésidente que j’ai demandé qu’un rapport complet sur la performance du service hotline soit \nsoumis dans les plus brefs délais. \nJ’ai demandé aussi au General Manager d’écrire officiellement à celui qui est \nresponsable de ce hotline 170 et une lettre est sortie, un warning letter est sortie, adressée à \ncelui qui est responsable de ce hotline. \n\n48 \n \nJ’attends, je dois le dire ici à l’Assemblée nationale et je suis sûr que les employés \nresponsables de ce hotline m’écoutent actuellement parce qu’ils savent que – ils ne sont pas \nau courant de ce que je vais dire ici – mais ils savent que cela va chauffer. J’attends de ce \nservice qu’il soit beaucoup plus réactif et qu’une meilleure coordination soit assurée entre le \nhotline 170 et le département de camions-citernes de la CWA afin que les doléances des \nabonnés puissent être traitées plus efficacement dans les meilleurs délais. Il est également \nclair qu’une augmentation des effectifs – donc, on recrute là comme je le disais un peu plus \ntôt – est envisagée pour améliorer de manière durable la performance et la qualité de ce \nservice essentiel au public. \nMs Anquetil: Une dernière, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Je fais juste une remarque, c’est ce qu’on appelle un numéro vert. Ce \nn’est pas que le 170 qui est déficient. \nMr Assirvaden: Moi, ce qui m’intéresse, c’est le 170. \nMadam Speaker: Je sais ! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. L’honorable ministre peut-il \ninformer la Chambre s’il est au courant que plusieurs tuyaux ont été posés à Belle Rose-\nQuatre Bornes sous l’ancien régime, mais n’ont jamais été raccordés, laissant ainsi les \nhabitants sans accès à l’eau dont ils ont désespérément besoin ? Je vous remercie, Madame la \nprésidente. \n(Interruptions) \n Mr Assirvaden: Je dirai quelques mots dessus avec votre permission, Madame la \nprésidente. \nMadam Speaker: Oui, je vous en prie. \nMr Assirvaden: Je comprends très bien ce que l’honorable membre dit en ce qui \nconcerne le raccordement des tuyaux à Quatre Bornes, mais malheureusement, il n’y a pas \nqu’à Quatre Bornes. Si vous allez en direction de Cascavelle par exemple – l’ancien ministre \ndoit sûrement savoir – quittant Beaux Songes, vous allez voir sur la gauche, des gros tuyaux \nque nous avons installés en 2023, sûrement en 2024. On a payé des millions de roupies. Ces \ntuyaux ne sont jamais raccordés. Il n’y a pas que ça. À Tamarin par exemple, le ministre est \nau courant… \n(Interruptions) \n\n49 \n \nLe ministre est au courant ! À Tamarin, Morcellement les Salines à Tamarin au \nMorcellement… \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Maunthrooa! Maunthrooa! \nMadam Speaker: Laissez parler… \nMr Assirvaden: Laissez-moi répondre !  \nMadam Speaker: Laissez parler le ministre ! \nMr Assirvaden: Au Morcellement les Salines à Tamarin, des tuyaux ont été posés pour \ndes millions et des millions de roupies. Ces tuyaux n’ont jamais… \nMs Anquetil: Incroyable ! \nMr Assirvaden: Et le ministre est au courant. Malheureusement, il ne pouvait pas \nmettre la pression avec Prakash Maunthrooa! C’est ça la raison ! Il ne pouvait pas le faire \nparce que l’ancien directeur général de la Central Water Authority ne répondait pas au \nministre ; il répondait à la cuisine. C’est cela le souci aujourd’hui ! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Merci. Chers amis, il nous reste cinq minutes. Est-ce que ça vaut le \ncoup ? Je ne crois pas, honorable Rookny. Vous voulez poser votre question ? \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, shall I go for my B/1040? My PQ B/1040 that was for \nthe hon. Prime Minister and allocated to… \nMadam Speaker: It was already replied. \nMr Rookny: No, it has not been replied but it has been redirected to the Minister of \nLand and Transport. \nMadam Speaker: Je n’ai rien compris. Pour l’instant, votre numéro, c’est B/1057. \nMr Rookny: Après lunch. \nMadam Speaker: Après lunch. Okay, let us break for lunch. We break for lunch and \nwe meet at 2.30 p.m. \nAt 12.56 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.35 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \n\n50 \n \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated! We will resume question time.  \nThe hon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet!  \nLIVESTOCK IMPORTATION – PERMIT HOLDERS – MONOPOLISATION OF \nSECTOR",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1057",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1057,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/1057) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard \nto the importation of livestock, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nthe – \n(a) \npersons or entities currently holding permits therefor;  \n(b) \nwhether any monopoly or dominant position exists in the sector, and  \n(c) \nnumber of import permit applications presently awaiting determination, \nindicating the reasons for the delay in processing same.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to inform \nthe House that the Division of the Veterinary Services of the Ministry has received \napplications for permit for the importation of livestock from three importers, that is – \n\nSocovia; \n\nUbora Ventures Ltd, and \n\nPunjoo Mamade Ehsan Moussa in 2025. \nAnd all three importers have been issued with import permits during the year. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, it is clear from my reply to part (a) that there is no \nmonopoly or dominant position in the sector.  \nConcerning part (c) of the question, two importers have made application in the month \nof October and November 2025. An import permit has been granted to Socovia (Belle Vue) \nLtd, whereas the application of Ubora Ventures Ltd received on the 26th of 2025 for import of \n700 cattle from South Africa is awaiting determination. \nI am informed, Madam Speaker, that the reason for the delay in processing the \napplication of Ubora Ventures Ltd is because a preliminary environmental report is awaited \nfrom the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Rookny? \n\n51 \n \nMr Rookny: Could the hon. Minister advise the House if the whole approval process at \nthe end of the day rests with the two veterinary officers of his Ministry? \nDr. Boolell: No, it does not rest on two veterinary officers of the Ministry but it rests on \nthe advice tendered by them and of course, you know, the matter is then referred to the \nMinistry to ensure that there is full assessment, in the light of which a decision is taken to \nserve the interest of all parties concerned. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre \nBornes, Chief Whip! \n \nSHELTERED MINORS – OVERSTAY IN PUBLIC HOSPITALS – ADMISSION & \nDISCHARGE DATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1058",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1058,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/1058) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to minors \nremoved from their families and placed under the custody of her Ministry, she will state the \nnumber thereof currently admitted in public hospitals, including the Brown-Sequard Hospital, \nindicating in each case the date of admission and expected discharge date.",
      "answer": "Ms Navarre-Marie: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I propose to reply to PQ \nB/1058 and PQ B/1073 together as they relate to the same subject matter. \nMadam Speaker: B/1073? \nMs Navarre-Marie: B/1073. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nMs Navarre-Marie: I wish to thank the hon. Members for raising these questions \nwhich have been a real concern since I took office and even long before as Member of the \nOpposition. My colleagues will agree with me that a child’s place is not in a shelter and \ncertainly not in a psychiatric hospital.  \nWith regard to minors removed from their families, I am tabling the information of \nchildren who are admitted in public hospitals, including Brown-Sequard Mental Healthcare \nHospital with the dates of admission and discharge. These children are under a Court Order \ngranted by the Children’s Court. \nMadam Speaker, reasons for overstaying at hospitals are multiple, ranging from – \n\n52 \n \n(a) \nResidential Care Institutions licenced under the Residential Care Institutions \nRegulations of the Children’s Act 2020 to admit children of specific age groups \nare running at full capacity. Accepting a new resident will breach capping ratios \nor supervision standards; \n(b) \nStaffing levels in existing RCIs cannot be adjusted to ensure care, particularly for \nthose children with psychiatric disorders and mental illness which result in the \ndisplay of behavioural attitudes and aggressivity; \n(c) \nChildren with psychiatric illness, mental disorders, sexualised behaviours require \none to one care attention and the existing staffing level in RCIs cannot attend to \nsame. This requires additional recruitment and there is a serious lack of \ncaregivers on the job market. \nGiven the situation, hospitals provide this safe supervision until a compliant placement \nbecomes available. I am informed that overstay occurs only when all legally permitted \nalternatives are exhausted. It is also important to flag out that one of the measures that we \nhave taken is to entrust children in foster families. For the first time, we marked the Foster \nCare Day this year and more than 100 families have registered as potential foster parents. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that with regard to overstay of minors in \nhospitals, a first meeting of a steering committee, co-chaired by my colleague, the hon. \nMinister of Health and Wellness and myself, was held on 11 August to discuss and find \nsolutions. Discussions were also held on the appropriate and dedicated support to be provided \nto these children. Subsequent meetings, co-chaired by representatives of my Ministry and the \nMinistry of Health and Wellness, were held on 18 August, 02 September and 28 October of \nthis year respectively. \nMadame la présidente, nous avons hérité d’une situation complexe. La plupart de nos \ncarers ne disposent pas de formations nécessaires pour accompagner, encadrer, réhabiliter les \nenfants qui nous sont confiés, particulièrement ceux dit with behavioural concern. Et comme \nle Children’s Act 2020 désigne l’hôpital comme place of safety, il y a eu une tendance ces \ndernières années, de placer ces enfants au Brown-Sequard Mental Healthcare Hospital par \ndéfaut. C’est une situation qui a duré pendant de longues années. Or, ces enfants ne \nreprésentent pas un groupe homogène. Il n’existe pas de solution unique. Chacun connait une \nréalité personnelle, souvent bouleversante avec des besoins spécifiques qui requiert une \napproche individualisée. \n\n53 \n \nMadame la présidente, je dois attirer l’attention de cette Chambre sur une pratique qui a \nété tolérée sous l’ancien régime, et qui doit cesser immédiatement – la surmédication \nsystématique des enfants placés en milieu psychiatrique. Nous sommes d’avis que le \nplacement en milieu psychiatrique doit être l’exception, jamais la règle, et limité dans le \ntemps. Il nous faut des structures spécialisées de type thérapeutique communautaire avec des \néquipes multidisciplinaires. Les admissions prolongées en psychiatrie sont reconnues comme \ncontraires au développement de l’enfant. \nMadame la présidente, que proposons-nous ?  \n \nPremièrement, de revoir la législation pour limiter strictement la durée de séjour \ndes enfants dans nos établissements hospitaliers. \n \nDeuxièmement, de promouvoir les familles d’accueil pour permettre aux enfants \nde vivre dans un environnement familial. Cela nous évitera d’ouvrir des shelters. \nConcernant les enfants présentant des troubles comportementaux, nous avons constitué \nun comité, présidé par le secrétaire permanent de mon ministère, pour transférer le \nRehabilitation Youth Centre (RYC), actuellement sous tutelle du bureau du Premier ministre, \nvers mon ministère. L’objectif est de mettre en place un véritable programme d’encadrement \net de réhabilitation. Cela nécessitera un changement de mentalité profond. Certains officiers \ndemeurent convaincus que leur rôle consiste à punir ces enfants, à les corriger. Ces vieilles \nhabitudes sont tenaces et doivent être combattues. Comment ? En recrutant des personnes \nappropriées et en les formant adéquatement. C’est ce que nous proposerons dans le prochain \nbudget. \nMadame la présidente, concernant la question de l’après-18 ans, malheureusement, \nnous ne disposons actuellement d’aucune solution de logement. Le sujet a été évoqué avec \nmes collègues, le ministre du Logement et des Terres et celui du ministère de l’Intégration \nsociale, de la Sécurité sociale et de la Solidarité nationale. Nous nous pencherons sur la \nquestion. En attendant une solution étatique pérenne, nous sommes en pourparlers avancés \navec une ONG qui accueille déjà certains de nos enfants et qui serait disposée à leur fournir \nun hébergement temporaire jusqu’à ce qu’ils acquièrent une autonomie financière. \n  Madame la présidente, tout est à revoir. Les shelters censés être des refuges \nprovisoires sont, malheureusement, devenus des lieux d’hébergement permanents. Il est \nimpératif de repenser l’encadrement de nos enfants. Notre mission n’est plus simplement de \n\n54 \n \nles garder, mais de les préparer à la vie. C’est à cette tâche que mon ministère s’attelle avec \ndétermination dans les limites de nos moyens actuels, mais avec la ferme volonté d’apporter \nles changements structurels que ces enfants méritent. Je vous remercie. \nMadam Speaker: Merci. Allez-y ! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Je remercie la ministre pour sa \nréponse. Hier, en visitant certains hôpitaux, j’ai été témoin d’une réalité bouleversante, \ncomme l’a si bien dit la ministre. 25 enfants placés par le ministère restent bloqués dans nos \nhôpitaux faute de placements. Et je me permets une petite parenthèse… \nMadam Speaker: Question! Question! \nMs Anquetil: …pour dire que j’étais agréablement surprise de rencontrer…  \nUne minute ! \nC’est un sujet qui n’est pas politique et je voudrais qu’on me donne le temps de poser \nma question. C’est un sujet sensible, pas politique ! Alors, donnez-moi le temps de \nm’exprimer.  \nJ’ai visité des hôpitaux. J’ai rencontré du personnel passionné, et vraiment, c’était bien. \nLa ministre trouve-t-elle acceptable que rien que pour 2025, 18 enfants placés, pourtant \nautorisés à quitter l’hôpital, soient privés de scolarité, d’un placement, et pire, exposés aux \ninfections ? Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. \nMs Navarre-Marie: Madame la présidente, naturellement, je ne trouve pas cela normal \ndu tout ! C’est pourquoi j’ai dit dans ma réponse que nous explorons toutes les possibilités \npour que ces enfants puissent d’abord être confiés à des familles d’accueil. The last resort \nwill be the shelter.  \nNous sommes sur la même longueur d’onde, Madame la présidente. Je suis tout à fait \nd’accord avec l’honorable membre que la place des enfants ne se trouve pas dans les hôpitaux \nni dans les shelters. La place d’un enfant est dans une famille, dans sa famille biologique de \npréférence. Mais s’il y a des problèmes, si des problèmes persistent dans la famille \nbiologique, donc, la dernière solution serait une famille d’accueil. \nMadam Speaker: Famille étendue aussi! Pas juste biologique. They call it next of kin.  \n\n55 \n \nMs Navarre-Marie: Oui ! Exacte ! \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMs Savabaddy: Merci, Madame la présidente. Je remercie l’honorable ministre pour sa \nréponse, que j’ai bien écouté, par rapport à la question B/1073. En attendant les autres \nministères concernés, est-ce que la ministre peut confirmer s’il y a eu une étude approfondie à \nce sujet, et comment aider ces jeunes qui autrement vont finir leur vie dans les rues ou entre \nles mains des réseaux de drogues sans encadrement approprié ? Merci. \nMs Navarre-Marie: Madame la présidente, à ma connaissance, il n’y a pas eu jusqu’ici \nd’études faites concernant le cas de ces enfants-là. Mais nous procédons actuellement à, \nallons dire, un survey inofficiel pour voir le nombre d’enfants touchés par ce problème et \nessayer de voir des alternatives pour confier ces enfants dans des structures appropriées \nautres que les rues. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nMs Savabaddy: Merci, Madame la présidente. Madame la ministre peut-elle confirmer \ns’il y a un time frame pour cela et combien de temps cela va prendre ? \nMs Navarre-Marie: Je suis désolée de dire que cela va prendre le temps qu’il faudra \nparce que nous disposons de peu de moyens financiers. Il nous faudra attendre le prochain \nbudget pour savoir s’il y a un time frame ou pas. Donc, à ma connaissance, nous travaillons, \nallons dire, à un rythme effréné pour pouvoir confier ces enfants, les abriter comme il se doit, \nmais il n’y a pas de time frame. Cela va prendre le temps qu’il faudra. Comme je vous le dis, \non travaille avec des moyens très, très limités. Il nous faudra voir dans le prochain budget \ncomment faire pour aller plus vite. \nMs Savabaddy: J’espère qu’une solution sera trouvée avant. \nMadam Speaker: On ne parle pas assis ! Mademoiselle ! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Les social workers du ministère \nde la Santé ne sont présents qu’aux heures de bureau et en demi-journée le samedi. La \nministre trouve-t-elle raisonnable que, pendant tout le reste du temps, aucun carer ne soit \n\n56 \n \nfourni par son ministère pour encadrer les enfants placés dans nos hôpitaux ? Je vous \nremercie, Madame la présidente.   \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister! \nMs Navarre-Marie: Bien sûr que ce n’est pas normal, Madame la présidente ! Ce n’est \npas normal du tout. Mais je l’ai dit et je le redis, nous avons des caregivers qui ne sont pas \nformés du tout. Nous avons hérité, malheureusement, d’une situation complexe et difficile \npour nos enfants. Certains caregivers travaillent de bonne foi, mais il y en a d’autres qui peut-\nêtre veulent travailler mais n’ont pas la formation nécessaire pour encadrer, accompagner, \nallons dire même, surveiller ces enfants. Donc, on n’a pas le nombre de carers formés à ce \nsujet. \nMs Anquetil: Une petite dernière, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Je comprends l’importance de cette question. Je pense que vous \nsavez pourquoi. Allez-y ! Je vous laisse. Madame la ministre, vous êtes sur le gril là. \nMs Navarre-Marie: Ok, il n’y a pas de souci ! \nMadam Speaker: Il faut accepter. C’est normal. \nMs Anquetil: Alors, la ministre peut-elle confirmer à la Chambre si elle est informée \nque plusieurs mineurs ont été envoyés directement au Brown Sequard Hospital par son \nministère sans même avoir été pris en charge par un hôpital classique ? Juge-t-elle cette \npratique acceptable ? Merci, Madame la présidente. \nMs Navarre-Marie: Madame la présidente, je ne suis pas au courant de ce cas. Si \nl’honorable membre a les informations précises, je lui demande de ne pas hésiter à venir vers \nmoi pour que je puisse enquêter davantage et trouver une solution, bien sûr.  \nMadam Speaker: Très bien. \nMs Savabaddy: Ma toute dernière.  \nMerci beaucoup, Madame la présidente. Puis-je demander à l’honorable ministre si elle \nest au courant du cas de ce jeune garçon, âgé de 17 ans et forcé en ce moment de rester dans \n\n57 \n \nun hôpital public jusqu’à ce qu’il atteigne ses 18 ans au mois de mars prochain ? Est-ce que la \nChild Development Unit a-t-elle été informé de ce cas ? Si oui, qu’est-ce qui sera fait ? \nMs Navarre-Marie: Je vais répondre la même chose : je ne suis pas au courant de ce \ncas. Si vous avez un cas spécifique, n’hésitez pas à venir vers moi ou vers les services du \nministère, on va s’enquérir et prendre les décisions qui s’imposent ? \nMadam Speaker: Quel hôpital, au moins ? \nMs Savabaddy: Jeetoo à Port Louis ! \nMadam Speaker: Jeetoo à Port Louis. Je pense qu’on peut laisser la ministre souffler \nun peu. Allez-y, moi maintenant du coup, je suis perdue, comme d’habitude.  \nNous avons, je pense, l’honorable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose \nBelle ! \nPOINTE DU DIABLE – PARKING FACILITIES & TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT \n– MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1059",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1059,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/1059) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to Pointe du Diable near Bambous-\nVirieux, he will state – \n(a) \nwhether consideration will be given for the provision of additional parking \nfacilities for visitors in view of the poor visibility along the main road thereat, and  \n(b) \nthe measures being envisaged to ensure safe access and proper traffic \nmanagement thereat, particularly during weekends.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed by the Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit that the issue of providing \nadditional parking facilities at Pointe du Diable does not fall on the purview of that Unit. \nHowever, as per information obtained from the Beach Authority, only two parking areas \nare currently available at the locus, both accommodating a total of 12 parking lots. These \nparking spaces have been provided by the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste \nManagement and Climate Change as part of the coastal protection works and partly by the \nNational Heritage Fund as the Ruins of the French batteries located there is a national \nheritage site. \n\n58 \n \nThe topography of the land at Pointe du Diable as well as the geometry of the road \nmake it very difficult for the provision of additional space as requested in the question. Being \ngiven that the place is a very popular view point, the available parking spaces are fully \nbooked, particularly during weekends and vehicles even park on the roadside, thus giving rise \nto potential traffic hazards.  \nAs regard part (b) of the question, Madam Speaker, I have requested the TRMSU to \nconsider the possibility of implementing appropriate traffic management measures along the \ncoastal road at the locus with a view to improving road safety. The police have also been \nrequested to step up the enforcement on inconsiderate on-street parking, particularly during \nweekends.  \nMadam Speaker, as we are dealing with the issue of parking, allow me and I seek your \nindulgence for two minutes at most, to raise a problem faced by disabled persons in our \ntowns. There are 80 parking spaces provided for disabled persons. My colleague, hon. Ashok \nSubron, Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity, has recently \ndrawn my attention last week to the fact that the parking slots earmarked for disabled persons \nare very often illegally occupied by other vehicle users. This causes undue hardships to those \nwho really need these parking facilities for their commuting and access to essential services.  \nTo deter such practices, my Ministry is considering to introduce strong measures \nagainst contraveners. To that effect, the parking fines for illegal use of parking slots reserved \nfor disabled persons will be reviewed upwards and we are thinking of doing this in the \ncontext of the revised parking rates that was announced by the hon. Prime Minister during \nbudget time. As such, the present fine of Rs1,000 provided for such unlawful use of parking \ncould be increased to Rs5,000, subject to government approval.  \nAs a last note, Madam Speaker, I, therefore, appeal to vehicle users to be very cautious \nand abstain from parking illegally in areas demarcated for disabled persons. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. \nYes, Mr Seeburn! \nMr Seeburn: Madam Speaker, being given that this is a very popular historical site, \nattracting lots of tourists and local visitors on weekdays and public holidays, will the hon. \nMinister consider the possibility of requesting the relevant authorities to remove the wooden \n\n59 \n \nbarriers that are next and adjacent to the existing canon itself and provide adequate parking \nfacilities for the safety of the road users and the visitors? \nMr Osman Mahomed: I will ask the Traffic Management and the Road Safety Unit to \nliaise with the Ministry of Environment and to try and sort out this issue. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d'Or, will you \nwait for a few minutes please? \nHon. Mohamed is stuck in the traffic. So, we will wait. Hopefully, he will be here. \nLet’s proceed for hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nINVALID PENSIONS – PROPOSED MAJOR REFORMS – TIMELINE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1060",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1060,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/1060) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the negotiations with the Mont \nChoisy Group for the identification of a site for the proposed construction of a market fair in \nFond du Sac to serve the Fond du Sac, The Vale and Grand Bay areas, he will state where \nmatters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Apologies, once again. When it rains; it \nrains.  \nSo, in answer to the question, I am informed that the District Council of \nPamplemousses is liaising with the Mont Choisy Group for a release of 6 acres of private \nland at Fond du Sac for the construction of the market fair. And, that is following important \nmeetings that have happened in 2025 and I am informed that on 02 April 2025, the Ministry \nof Local Government confirmed to my Ministry that the marker fair and other associated \namenities project at Fond du Sac form part of the list of projects to be implemented. The \nlatter ministry had, on 12 February 2025, also submitted a preliminary layout plan for the \nmarket fair project.  \nThis is the information I have. \n\n63 \n \nMadam Speaker: Alright, yes.  \nThe hon. First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix. \nE-HEALTH PROJECT – MEDICAL PRESCRIPTION DIGITALISATION – \nSERVICE DELIVERY MODERNISATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1061",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1061,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/1061) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \nwhether, in regard to the Invalid Pensions, he will state where matters stand as to the \nproposed major reforms envisaged, indicating the proposed timeline for the implementation \nthereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nLIVERPOOL FOOTBALL CLUB INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY MAURITIUS \n(FORMER) – YOUNG FOOTBALLERS – SUPPORT & FOLLOW-UP",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1062",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1062,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/1062) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the former Liverpool Football Club \nInternational Academy, Mauritius, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as \nto the support provided to and/or follow-up made of the young footballers across all age \ngroups who were part thereof, indicating the number thereof who – \n(a)  made it to professional football, and  \n(b)  pursued alternative pathways.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, the former Liverpool Football Club International \nAcademy Mauritius commonly referred to as the Liverpool Football Academy was set up in \nJune 2019 and was placed at the Côte d’Or National Sports Complex.  \n\n60 \n \nI am informed by the Mauritius Multisports Infrastructure Limited that the young \nfootballers who formed part of the former Liverpool Football Academy benefited from a \ncomprehensive support programme across all age groups. This included – \nfree coaching, provision of training kits and transport facilities to attend training \nsessions three times weekly.  \nMedical and paramedical assistance, including physiotherapy sessions and \naccess to gym facilities.  \nRegular physical fitness assessment and guidance on proper nutrition and diet;  \nthe trainees were covered by an insurance scheme, and  \ntrainees who required academic assistance were granted financial support by the \nTrust Fund for excellence in sports.  \nThe trainees of Liverpool Football Academy were also offered the opportunity to participate \nin annual tours. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am further informed by the \nMauritius Multisports Infrastructure Limited that only four players have progressed to \nprofessional football; three in USA and one in France. Six other players had trials in \nprofessional clubs in Europe and Réunion Island but unfortunately, they were not successful \nin securing contracts.  \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Mauritius Multisports \nInfrastructure Limited that over its six years of operation, players released by the Liverpool \nFootball Academy were used as a feeder system to the National Football League. Those who \nwere unable to secure position in the National Football League, subsequently joined the \nCentre Technique National François Blaquart which provides a continuation pathway for \nplayers aged 18 to 20.  \nNotwithstanding what I have just stated, Madam Speaker, I have to draw the attention \nof this House to the fact that the operation of the Liverpool Football Academy together with \nits annual license fee has cost the State more than Rs168 million over its six years of \noperation, that is, from 2019 to 2025.  \n\n61 \n \nMadam Speaker, out of 545 players who have been trained under the Liverpool \nFootball Academy only four were able to secure contract with professional football teams. \nEven more alarming, Madam Speaker, 72 players were dismissed by the Academy for poor \nperformance. A whopping 112 players had quit and 54 had to leave having reached the age \nlimit.  \nPour un gouvernement responsable, Madame la présidente, poursuivre sur cette voie \nn’était plus acceptable compte tenu de l’état de profonde précarité dans lequel se trouvait \nl’économie mauricienne et les résultats non concluants and it is precisely for this reason, \nMadam Speaker, that this Government, as part of its programme for the revival of football \nhas come up with a new structure in form of a centre national d’excellence de football. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nYes!  \nMr Quirin: Merci. Peut-on savoir de l’honorable ministre, avec la fermeture de \nl’académie de Liverpool, combien de joueurs de l’ancienne académie qui vont intégrer le \ncentre national de formation François Blaquart ? Est-ce que le centre est déjà opérationnel ou \nbien ce sera le cas dans un proche avenir ? Combien de jeunes footballeurs, toutes catégories \nconfondues, qui étaient au Liverpool Academy, ont intégré ou vont intégrer la nouvelle \nstructure qui sera mise en place ?   \nMr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, I would refer the hon. Member to my reply to PQ \nB/999 on la relance du football à Maurice at our Sitting of 11 November 2025. You will \nhave all the answers/replies required.  \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente, malheureusement je n’ai pas la réponse du ministre \nsous la main  \nMadam Speaker: On va lui faire confiance pour le moment.  \nMr Quirin: Lui faire confiance – on verra bien.  \nPeut-il nous dire, malgré toutes les garanties qu’il nous a données par rapport à la \nnouvelle structure, il n’est pas sans savoir qu’il y a eu quand même cette période de transition \nentre la fermeture de l’académie de Liverpool et l’ouverture de la nouvelle structure François \nBlaquart. Il y a quand même eu plusieurs mois … \nMadam Speaker: Une période grise, on va dire. \n\n62 \n \nMr Quirin: … une période morte pour ces jeunes. Donc, il n’est pas sans savoir que \nles fléaux sont là et ces jeunes ont été laissés à eux même. Donc, si je comprends bien, \nl’honorable ministre peut-il nous confirmer effectivement que tous ces jeunes qui étaient à \nLiverpool Academy – c’est ça ma question, c’est une question simple qu’il peut très bien \nrépondre s’il le veut – combien de ces jeunes vont intégrer la nouvelle structure sans que \npersonne ne soit laissée au bord de la route ? \nMadam Speaker: Maybe you can answer that. \nMr Nagalingum: I can answer, Madam Speaker. Already, all the young footballers that \nwere in the Liverpool Football Academy, are now practicing at the Blaquart. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, you will find out in due course.  \nI am coming back to the hon. Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or. \nI welcome back our hon. Minister for Housing and Lands.  I thought I had lost you.  \nFOND DU SAC – SITE IDENTIFICATION – MARKET FAIR \nCONSTRUCTION – UPDATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1063",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1063,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1063) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Health and Wellness whether in regard to the e-Health project, he will state where \nmatters stand as to the implementation thereof, indicating whether it comprises an e-\ndispensing component wherein medical prescriptions will be sent electronically, thus \nenabling enhanced stock control and reducing queues in public health institutions.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I wish to refer the hon. Member to my response to PQ \nB/46 from the Sitting of 04 February 2025 in which I provided an update regarding the status \nof implementation of the e-Health project which forms part of government’s global digital \ntransformation agenda aimed at modernising service delivery across the health sector. \nMadam Speaker, Phase I focuses on the deployment of the foundational modules that \nestablish the necessary digital infrastructure to support patient and health service \nmanagement. The core module includes a Patient Administration System (PAS), e-Health \nportal and mobile application, Blood Transfusion Services (BTS) and donor management \napplication, reporting an analytics and laboratory information management systems. \n Additional modules that were initially earmarked for Phase II, were also brought \nforward with a view to providing a fully paperless patient experience at the earliest possible \nstage. As a result of this exercise, the testing phase started on 23 August 2025 at Flacq \nHospital which was the most advanced in terms of site preparedness.  \nThe system is currently being piloted there and in several associated primary healthcare \nfacilities namely Bel-Air and Belvédère Mediclinic, Bramsthan Area Health Centre, and \nMedine Camp de Masque Community Health Centre. Weekly interministerial committee \nmeetings are being held with the Ministry of Information Technology, Communication and \nInnovation, the UNDP to fast-track implementation and resolve operational challenges in real \ntime.  \nMadam Speaker, with regard to the e-dispensing component, I am informed that the \npharmacy module currently provides the functionality for pharmacy studio electronic \nprescription directly from the pharmacy desk and to manually mark each prescribed medicine \n\n64 \n \nas fully or partially dispensed. This allows for accurate tracking of prescription dispensed \nunder the e-Health system. At this stage however, the module does not yet include the \ninventory management feature which means that automated real time stock control is not \navailable at this stage. The inventory management system, together with the full e-dispensing \ncapability where prescriptions will be transmitted electronically from the consultation room \nto the pharmacy, will be implemented in a subsequent phase of this project.  \nMadam Speaker, once the full pharmacy module is deployed, the system will allow \nautomated stock updates, improve forecasting and replenishment up-lining and better \nalignment between prescribing patterns and stock levels. This will considerably strengthen \nmedicine supply chain efficiently and reduce wastage or shortages across facilities. \nMadam Speaker, even at this early stage, the pilot system has demonstrated tangible \nbenefits. The digital capture of prescriptions and reduction in paper-based processes have \nalready contributed to improve queuing management, reduce congestion at registration desk \nand pharmacy counters and a smoother flow of patients within the hospital environment. \nThese eventual roll outs of full e-dispensing will further minimise queues, reduce waiting \ntime, enhance overall patient experience across public health institutions.  \nMy Ministry will continue to monitor the implementation process closely and refine the \nsystem through ongoing optimisation, capacity building of staff and strengthening of \ninstitutional processes with the objectives of ensuring successful deployment of e-health \nsystem across all public health institutions.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister.   \nMr Lobine: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister whether this \nproject, at completion phase, will also englobe the private sector, the private health providers \nand private doctors so that there is a liaison between the public sector and the private sector? \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, that does not form part of a project. I hope that later on. \nwe can take it over.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Prayag. \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Minister confirm whether \nprovision has been made to procure generators for all the mediclinics and the AHCs that will \nbe working on the e-Health system afterwards? \nMr Bachoo: If the need is felt, we definitely have to take recourse to this.  \n\n65 \n \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr François.  \nMr François: Yes, thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister whether \nthe e-Health network system will consist of a link component with Rodrigues especially to \nfacilitate the transfer and follow-up of patients from Rodrigues to hospitals here? Actually, it \nis a complete mess and chaotic for patients.  \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, we are looking into this and I will be having \nconsultations with the Ministry of Information Technology.  \nMadam Speaker: Now, the Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d'Or, Mr \nBeejan. \nThis one will be replied the Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and \nClimate Change. \nPOINTE AUX CANNONIERS – FOOTBALL PITCH RENOVATION – \nPROJECT STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1064",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1064,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1064) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the recent renovation of the \nfootball pitch at Pointe aux Cannoniers, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to – \n(a) \nthe scope of works thereof; \n(b)  the name of the contractor therefor; \n(c) \nthe initial contracted and final costs thereof, and  \n(d)  whether his Ministry has considered or will consider – \n (i) \ntaking remedial actions to properly level the pitch which currently presents \na safety hazard; \n(ii) \nthe installation of lighting facilities to allow for evening use, and \n(iii) \nprovision of toilet and changing room facilities thereat and, if so, when. \nThe Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change (Mr \nR. Bhagwan): Thank you Madam Speaker. I am informed by the Beach Authority that the \nVale Public Beach of an extent 0.32 hectare was initially partly covered with grass and sand. \n\n66 \n \nThe plot of land is sloppy with a gradient exceeding one metre. Representations have been \nmade by the inhabitants for the construction of a proper football pitch.  \nFurther to requests received from inhabitants of the regions and beach users, funds were \nallocated during the Financial Year 2022-2023 to the Beach Authority for the upgrading of \nsame to the National Development Unit under the COVID-19 Project Development Funds. \nMadam Seaker, as regards part (a) of the question, the scope of works included mainly \n– \n\nCut and fill of the existing ground to make it level; \n\nConstruction of 85 metres retaining wall within filled reinforced block walls on \nthree sides; \n\nAssociated works for the retaining wall including the construction of reinforced \nconcrete bases; \n\nCasting of a tied beam at the top rendering and painting; \n\nSupply and fixing of plastic-coated chain link; \n \nLaying of geotextile and levelling of the beach area with 150mm to 200mm fixed \nlayers of spores;  \n \nPlanting of grass on the beach area;  \n \nSupply and fixing of turbs, and  \n \nMinor levelling of the parking space. \nMadam Speaker, as regard parts (b) and (c) of the question, the Beach Authority \nlaunched bids on 25 January 2023 for the project to level the ground of the public beach after \nbid evaluation. The contract was awarded to contractor Loro Construction Ltd for an amount \nof Rs1,677,250 following board’s approval on 29 March 2023. Works started on 26 May \n2023 and the project was completed on 18 August 2023. The total payment effected to the \ncontractor was Rs1,661,964. \nWith regard part to (d) (i) and (ii) of the question, I am further informed that the Beach \nAuthority will carry out further levelling works as important sand has partly been washed out \nand additional lighting will be provided also. Works are scheduled to start in two weeks.  \n\n67 \n \nAs regards part (d) (iii) of the question, consideration would be given for provision of \ntoilets and training room facilities taking in consideration planning policy guidelines and \navailability of space.  \nMadam Speaker: Do you have a question?",
      "answer": "Mr Beejan: Yes. Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Minister inform the House \nwhy a basic standard of safety and levelness was not achieved in the initial exercise prior to \ngeneral elections 2024? This has caused much problems to the youngsters and also to the \nwider community of Pointe aux Cannoniers. \nMr Bhagwan: We all know how projects were managed prior. We have assumed duty \nin Government. So, we are exploring ways and means to at least redress the situation in \nconsultation with MPs of the constituency. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. Second Member for Rodrigues, please! \nRODRIGUES – ELECTRIC POLES DISPLACEMENT & EXTENSION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1065",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1065,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/1065) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister \nof Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the displacement and extension of electric \npoles for high and low voltage networks in Rodrigues to new residents in morcellement and \nnon-morcellement areas on State lands, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCentral Electricity Board (CEB), information as to – \n(a) \nthe number of pending cases for – \n(i) \nextension, and \n(ii) \ndisplacement to allow customers apply for CEB clearance for Building \nand Land Use Permit, and \n(b) \nwhether – \n(i) \na review of the CEB available Schemes to facilitate access to electricity, \nand \n(ii) \nconsideration of special derogation for Rodrigues for remedial action to \nease the financial burden on lessees thereat, will be envisaged.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, en ce qui concerne la partie (a) (i) de la \nquestion, je suis informé par le CEB que pour l’année 2025, il y a eu 20 demandes \n\n68 \n \nd’électricité qui nécessitaient une extension du réseau du CEB, dont deux sont en attente à ce \njour. \nConcernant la partie (a) (ii), pour l’année 2025, il y a eu 26 demandes de dépassement \ndu réseau CEB, parmi lesquelles, quatre sont en attente à jour.  \nConcernant la partie (b) (i) de la question, j’ai appris que le CEB gère actuellement \nplusieurs programmes d’assistance visant à faciliter l’accès à l’électricité pour ses clients.  \nCes programmes comprennent – \n(i) \nUne aide pour les extensions des réseaux basse tension d’un maximum de cinq \npoteaux pour les clairières résidentielles – donc, ceci est applicable à Rodrigues, \nmais aussi à Maurice –, qui remplissent les conditions requises pour de tels \nprogrammes ainsi que pour les organisations sociales, religieuses et caritatives ; \n(ii) \nSi les clients résidentiels ne sont pas éligibles au programme d’aide à \nl’extension du réseau de basse tension – basse tension, c’est devant la porte pour \nemmener à la maison –, deux options leur sont proposées pour faciliter \nl’extension du réseau basse tension uniquement, soit une contribution non \nremboursable de 50 % du coût du projet, soit le paiement intégral du coût qui \nsera remboursé en part égale sur cinq ans aux clients ; \n(iii) \nPour les nouveaux clients commerciaux, il existe le programme faciliter les \naffaires, dans le cas duquel le CEB prend en charge 50% des coûts d’extension \ndes réseaux basses et hautes tensions ;  \n(iv) \nPour les clients industriels dont les projets sont viables, le CEB exigera le \npaiement intégral du coût du projet, qui sera remboursé aux clients en part égale \nsur cinq ans. Si le projet n’est pas viable, le coût d’extension du réseau sera \nentièrement à la charge du demandeur. \nJ’ai été informé que les deux premiers dispositifs mentionnés ci-dessus ne s’appliquent \npas aux demandes concernant des sites issus du morcellement de terrain. De plus, en ce qui \nconcerne le déplacement du réseau, bouz kolon, le CEB prend en charge 50 % du coût du \ndéplacement du réseau basse tension pour les clients résidentiels. \nConcernant le point (b) (ii), le plus important je pense de la question, je tiens à informer \nl’Assemblée que les dispositifs applicables à Maurice sont également étendus aux clients \néligibles à Rodrigues.  \n\n69 \n \nÀ ce stade, Madame la présidente, le CEB m’informe qu’aucune dérogation particulière \nn’est envisagée.  \nMr François: Yes, thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr François: May I ask the hon. Minister whether he is agreeable to table the actual \nrates of the déplacement des colonnes? \nMr Assirvaden: The rate? \nMr François: The rates applicable. \nMadam Speaker: Oui, pour le déplacement des colonnes. \nMr Assirvaden: Alors, je disais que le CEB prend en change 50 % du déplacement du \nréseau.  \nMadam Speaker: Du réseau. \nMr Assirvaden: C’est dépendant d’où on va mettre le poteau, si c’est un peu plus loin. \nJe peux essayer de voir. Je le déposerai. Merci, Madame la présidente. \nMr François: The hon. Minister mentioned that some of the schemes are not applicable \nto morcellement. Basically, we do not have morcellement, but we have subdivisions on the \nState land in Rodrigues. Does this make a difference so that consideration will be given in \nour case? We have subdivisions on the State lands, but not morcellement as it is in Mauritius. \nMr Assirvaden: Je peux essayer de voir avec le CEB, comme vous n’avez pas de \nmorcellement à Rodrigues ; vous avez des subdivisions. Je peux essayer de voir. Merci. \nMadam Speaker: Very good! Now, we have finished with hon. François. Hon. First \nMember for La Caverne and Phoenix, again, please! \nVACOAS-PHOENIX MUNICIPAL COUNCIL – SPORTS INFRASTRUCTURES \n– RENOVATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1066",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1066,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1066) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the sports infrastructures, including \ngymnasiums, falling under the purview of the Municipal Council of  Vacoas-Phoenix, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether surveys of the state thereof \nhave been conducted and, if so, indicate whether evaluations of the renovation, rehabilitation \n\n70 \n \nand re-equipping costs thereof and the required timeframe for the implementation thereof \nhave been worked out.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Health and Wellness (Mr A. Bachoo): Madam Speaker, the \nMunicipal Council of Vacoas-Phoenix has informed that it has 33 gymnasiums and 15 \nfootball grounds under its jurisdiction. Comprehensive surveys have been carried at all the \nsports facilities and numerous defective items and equipment were identified and earmarked \nfor repair and upgrading.  \nI am tabling the renovation, rehabilitation and re-equipping of the infrastructures that \nhave been implemented and whose total estimate is Rs53.8 million. \nThe hon. Member may wish to note that in the context of Budget Estimates 2025-2026, \nmy Ministry had submitted a proposal of Rs400 million for construction and upgrading of \namenities for all the 12 local authorities, out of which, Rs40 million was applied for the \nproject construction and upgrading of amenities on behalf of the Municipal Council of \nVacoas-Phoenix. \nMadam Speaker, it is expected that funds would be made available in the forthcoming \nfinancial years to attend the above-mentioned renovation projects. \nMadam Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nMAURITIUS OLYMPIC COMMITTEE – SPECIAL ADVISER, MR M.B. – \nALLEGED RECORDING & CANVASSING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1067",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1067,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/1067) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the 2025 Elective General Assembly of \nthe Mauritius Olympic Committee , he will state if he has taken cognizance of a recording \ncirculated prior thereto wherein his Special Adviser, Mr M. B., is purportedly heard in a \nconversation with Mr P. T., President of the Association Mauricienne de Boxe, allegedly \ncanvassing in favour of some candidates and, if so, will he state if an inquiry has been carried \nout thereinto and, if so, indicate the outcome thereof and the actions, if any, taken in relation \nthereto or being contemplated, if any.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that I have taken \ncognizance of the recording that was circulated on the eve of the elective general assembly of \nthe Mauritius Olympic Committee. Since this recording has never been authenticated, I do \nnot intend to take any action in relation thereto. \n\n71 \n \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente, c’est une affaire… \nMr Apollon: Madam Speaker, on a point of order.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Apollon: I just want to seek the guidance of the Chair whether it is permissible to \nask a question related to an alleged recording which has not been authenticated and whose \ntranscript has not been laid before this Assembly? \nMadam Speaker: But we just now learnt that it has not been authenticated. \n(Interruptions) \nMr Apollon: But is it permissible to ask this question? \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: No, one moment. Are you going to do it?  \n(Interruptions) \nHon. A. Duval, do you want to come and sit here? Do you want to come and sit here?  \n(Interruptions) \nThere was a point of order. I cannot even give any ruling if everybody will give a ruling \nin my stead. \n(Interruptions) \nI am referring to your point. What I heard was that it was not authenticated. That was a \nreply to that question. So, for the moment, it is okay. Now, if he asks something else, then we \nwill see. You were a little too early. Come on! \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. Je considère cette affaire extrêmement grave \nmalgré… \nMadam Speaker: Tout est grave !  \nMr Quirin: Malgré la réponse… \nMadam Speaker: Tout est grave. \nMr Quirin: …que vient de nous donner l’honorable ministre. Peut-il nous expliquer \npar quel miracle – un terme qu’il aime bien utiliser – son conseiller spécial s’est arrogé le \ndroit de parler en son nom en invoquant même le DPM pour faire du lobbying ? \n\n72 \n \nMadam Speaker : Non, non, non. \n(Interruptions) \nMr Quirin : … pour faire du lobbying… \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: … ki to konpran… \nMadam Speaker : Non, non, non. I will not have this. If you are referring to that same \nincident, the answer was it was not authenticated. So, you cannot put any more on that one. I \ndo not see how you can pursue. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: You can’t! \nMadam Speaker: How can you pursue that? It has not been authenticated. We do not \nknow who it was. \nMr Quirin: We know … \nMadam Speaker: You know! \nMr Quirin: He knows as well. \nMadam Speaker: I cannot accept that.  \nMr A. Duval: How can you not allow it! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: I will not allow this question. \nMr Quirin: Missie Moustass ti korek! Missie Moustass ti bon! \nMr A. Duval: Zot pe ale mem ar Missie Moustass toulezour, sa kapav poze an kestion ! \nAn hon. Member: Ey ale do! \nMr Quirin: Cover-up! Cover-up! \nMadam Speaker: I cannot accept this question. \nMr Quirin: Cover-up! \nMadam Speaker: I do not know what hon. Mr A. Duval is talking about but I cannot \naccept your question. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, on a point of order to clarify your ruling. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Kisasa! \n\n73 \n \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: Sittings at the National Assembly since the general elections have time \nand time again referred to alleged recordings… \nMr Bhagwan: Manque du respect. \nMr A. Duval: … including those of Missie Moustass. \nMadam Speaker: Let me… \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: Let me take a point of order! The point of order being why is it that \nMembers on the government side have been able to put questions on those alleged recordings \nand that the Member from this side is not being allowed to? \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Let me answer. May I be allowed to answer? From what I heard this \nmorning, maybe even before, there are investigations going on regarding Mr Moutass \nwhereas in this case, I understand that… \nMr A. Duval: Nobody wants to investigate, that is the point! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Twa to enn malelve … \nMr Quirin: Mem pa enn lanket… \nMadam Speaker: I can still not … \nMr Quirin: To mem pa fer enn lanket lor la! \nMadam Speaker: Okay! When you finish all of you… \n(Interruptions) \nMr Quirin: Pourquoi? \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: May I be allowed, hon. Minister, to reply? Now, if you go on like \nthis, I am going to lose, not my temper, but I am going to lose my head. \nMr Quirin: Shame! \nMadam Speaker: What I was trying to say, if you will allow me, hon. Member, I do \nnot know if I have to believe him or not, that is not my job. What I heard him saying was that \n\n74 \n \nit has not been authenticated. It is not the same. It is not the same situation. The other one is \nunder investigation. \nSo, I will not take this comparison. Now, let us proceed with the other questions. Alors, \nhon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues, Mr Edouard! \nMr Edouard: Madam Speaker, B/1068. \nMr A. Duval: … at the end of the day… \nMr Mohamed: On a point of order, the hon. Member is making comments from a \nsitting position. He had the opportunity of trying to open his mouth for worthwhile reasons \nwhen he was Speaker but chose to fly around the country using taxpayers’ money. In the \ncircumstances, Madam Speaker, may I ask you, humbly, to request this hon. Member to start \nbehaving in a proper manner? \nThe Deputy Prime Minister:  Malelve! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Mohamed: Shut it! \nMadam Speaker: I do not want to keep repeating the same things over and over \nagain… \nMr Mohamed:  Pa deklar malin. \nMadam Speaker: Please, hon. Minister! Please! \nMr Mohamed: Yes. I apologise. \nMr Mohamed: Pa deklar malin kan ou pa malin. \nMr A. Duval: Tah, ale do ta… \nMadam Speaker: Why don’t you guys … \nMr A. Duval:  … ar zot de pwa de mezir ! Ale ar zot de pwa de mezir ! \nMadam Speaker: Are you saying this for me? \nMr Mohamed: Vwayaze ankor do pigeon. \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: Twa ki pe dir mwa sa la ? Twa ki pe dir mwa sa la ? \nMr Mohamed: Vwayaz ar taxpayer’s money. \n\n75 \n \nMr A. Duval: Twa ki pe dir mwa sa la ? \nMadam Speaker: Oh my God! \nMr Mohamed:  Mwa ki pe dir twa… \nMr Assirvaden: Pigeon lin dir ein… pigeon. \nMr A. Duval: Nou ti dir li get vwayaz lot fwa la! \nMr Mohamed:  Dir, dir, dir ta. To nek koze, to pan konn… \nMr Assirvaden: To’nn bien dir pigeon! \n(Interruptions) \n Mr Mohamed: Al pran consey ar papi to vini! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, I am suspending the Sitting. That is enough! I am \nsuspending the Sitting. \nAt 3.28 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 3.41 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated and take a deep breath. \nOkay, I am now calling on the hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues. \nRODRIGUES – LIVESTOCK EXPORT – EMBARGO – MAURITIUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1068",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1068,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/1068) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) the Minister of Agro-\nIndustry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to the livestock in \nRodrigues, he will state whether his Ministry will consider lifting the embargo imposed on \nthe export thereof to Mauritius.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much. Madam Speaker, there is no embargo in respect in \nthe movement of cattle, sheep and goats from Rodrigues. The last restriction of movement of \nlivestock from Rodrigues to Mauritius was imposed in March 2021 following the detection of \nfoot and mouth disease cases. \nNow, in order to control the depletion of Rodrigues livestock population, the Rodrigues \nRegional Assembly had imposed a temporary restriction of movement of cattle for the period \nof two months as from 24 February 2025. \n\n76 \n \nMadam Speaker, since May 2025, a revised protocol for the movement of cattle from \nRodrigues to Mauritius is applicable and the protocol inter alia makes provision for the \nfollowing conditions – \n1. \nThe division of the veterinary services inspects farms in Mauritius to verify \ncompliance with regard to biosecurity measures in place prior to issuing \nmovement permits; \n2. \nThe veterinary services of Rodrigues Regional Assembly conducts foot-and-\nmouth disease virus testing, identification and registration of the National \nLivestock Information System; \n3. \nThe veterinary services of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly send the result of \nthe test to the division of the veterinary services; only livestock tested negative \nfor foot-and-mouth disease by the veterinary services of the Commission for \nAgriculture in Rodrigues is authorised for movement into Mauritius; \n4. \nAfter assessment of the test results, identification, farms and other necessary \ninformation, the division of the veterinary services issues the movement permit; \n5. \nUpon arrival in Mauritius, after inspection by a veterinary officer, livestock is \nallowed to move from port area to the respective approved farms as per the \nmovement permit, and  \n6. \nFailing to comply with any of the above conditions shall imply that the applicant \nor farmer shall not be allowed to move livestock from Rodrigues for at least one \nyear. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that on 7 October 2025, my Ministry \nrequested the Commission for Agriculture, Rodrigues Regional Assembly to provide \ninformation with regard to the number of goats and sheep which could be made available to \nMauritius for the end of year festivities. A quota for movement of livestock has been provided \nby the Commission for Agriculture, the Rodrigues Regional Assembly on 9 October 2025 for \n1,150 animals including cows, bulls, goats and sheep for the period October to December \n2025. From the beginning of November 2025 to date, 75 cattle, 457 sheep and 300 goats have \nalready reached Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes, hon. Edouard? \n\n77 \n \nMr Edouard: Is the hon. Minister aware that with the present protocol, farmers are \nlosing confidence in livestock farming and they are stressed with overcrowded farms? \nDr. Boolell: No, I am not aware. I am glad that you made me aware but then the \nCommission for Agriculture of Rodrigues should see to it that the matter is addressed in a \nvery forceful and meaningful manner and to see to it the biosecurity and safety is the crux of \nlivestock farming. \nMr François: Madam Speaker… \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nMr François: Just one supplementary if you allow me. May I ask the hon. Minister \nwhether there is still Food and Mouth Diseases (FMD) traceability in Rodrigues? \nDr. Boolell: As of now, no. There is no case reported. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, the hon. First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand \nRiver South East! \nCONSTITUENCY NO.10 – FOOTBALL PITCHES – LIGHTING INSTALLATION & \nMAINTENANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1069",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1069,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1069) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the football pitches of Bel Air, \nErnest, Bramsthan and Sebastopol, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nDistrict Council of Flacq, information as to a timeframe for the installation of lighting \nfacilities thereat and adequate maintenance thereof.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Health and Wellness (Mr A. Bachoo): Madam Speaker, I am \ninformed there are two football pitches in Bel Air, one located at St Michel and the other one \nat Petit Bois Caroline, while the village of Bramsthan has only one football ground. \nAccording to the District Council of Flacq, the respective lighting system of the three \naforementioned football pitches is functional. \nWith regard to Ernest Florent football ground, I am advised the Council intends to \nreplace the existing underground cables by new overhead wiring as well as the floodlights. \nMadam Speaker, there are two football grounds at Sebastopol located at Pellegrin and \nLesur in Sebastopol where the floodlights have to be replaced as well. I am informed that due \nto budgetary constraints, the projects at Ernest Florent and Sebastopol football grounds have \n\n78 \n \nbeen deferred and my Ministry and the District Council of Flacq are exploring alternative \nfunding sources. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. No supplementary? Okay, the hon. Third Member for \nPamplemousses and Triolet! \nWATER SUPPLY CONNECTIONS – NEW APPLICATIONS – TIMELINE FOR \nCLEARANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1070",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1070,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/1070) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to new applications for water \nsupply connections, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water \nAuthority, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber thereof currently pending, category-wise, indicating – \n(i) \nwhen same were submitted, and  \n(ii) \nreasons for the delays, and  \n(b) \nmeasures being taken to expedite same and expected timelines for clearance.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, la CWA m’informe qu’elle gère six zones sur \nl’île. Ces six zones reçoivent en moyenne 300 nouvelles demandes par semaine. On \nm’informe que la CWA soustraite la réalisation des nouveaux raccordements à des entreprises \nprivées. Ces entreprises sont tenues d’effectuer au minimum 40 nouveaux raccordements et \n20 m2 de travaux de réfection, de voirie par semaine et par zone sur cinq jours ouvrables hors \nweekends et jours fériés. \nSelon \nles \ninformations \ncommuniquées \npar \nla \nCWA, \nsur \nles \nsix \nzones \nd’approvisionnement en eau, deux à savoir les zones de Nord et Lower, n’ont aucun sous-\ntraitant pour la réalisation des nouveaux raccordements. Ces opérations sont effectuées en \ninterne par la CWA. La CWA a indiqué que pour les deux nouveaux appels d’offre qui seront \nlancés prochainement pour ces deux zones, le nombre minimal de nouvelles demandes à \nraccordement à traiter par semaine passera de 40 à 60. \nMadame la présidente, concernant la partie (a) de la question, j’ai été informé que le \nnombre total de nouvelles demandes reçues depuis 2020 à ce jour, s’élève à 53 892, dont 38 \n296 raccordements ont été effectués, 1 984 annulés. Actuellement, nous avons 13 612 \ndemandes qui sont encore en attente pour la zone d’approvisionnement en eau pour les six \nsecteurs.  \n\n79 \n \nConcernant la partie (a)(ii) de la question, la CWA m’informe également que les \nprincipales causes de retard dans la mise en place des nouveaux approvisionnements sont \nmultiples et comprennent – \n\nRetard dans l’attribution du contrat de réparation des nouveaux raccordements ; \n\nDroit de passage accordé par la RDA et d’autres autorités locales ; \n\nEn attente des travaux de pose de tuyaux internes effectués par les demandeurs ; \n\nRetard de paiement ; \n\nDocuments manquants, non-soumis ; \n\nConditions de chantier difficiles, et dernier \n\nLitige entre demandeurs et familles et voisins. \nMadame la présidente, concernant la partie (b) de la question, la CWA m’informe que \npour résorber l’arriéré, elle envisage de prendre une série de mesures, celles-ci comprennent \n– \n(a) \nRenforcer les capacités d’enquête sur le terrain grâce à un déploiement d’équipe \nd’enquêteurs supplémentaire dans les zones où le retard est important, \nréaffectation temporaire du personnel technique dans d’autres zones, introduction \nd’un objectif hebdomadaire de production d’enquête par équipe,  \n(b) \nMobilisation accélérée des entrepreneurs et suivi des performances. Donc, \naugmenter le nombre d’équipes d’installation active en réaffectant les sous-\ntraitants. Augmentation du minimum hebdomadaire du 40 à 55 unités par \nentrepreneur. \nMadame la présidente, comme indiqué précédemment au cours des cinq dernières \nannées, soit de 2020 à ce jour, 13 612 demandes de raccordement des tuyaux d’eau potable \ndans la zone des six secteurs sont toujours en attente. Bien que la CWA a indiqué que des \nmesures correctives sont prises pour résorber ce retard, je crains que le traitement de ces \ndemandes ne prenne un peu plus de temps. La CWA m’a également informé qu’à l’expiration \ndes contrats de nouveaux raccordements d’ici début 2026, elle lancera un accord cadre afin \nd’accélérer les nouveaux raccordements et la remise en état des routes. \nL’Assemblée voudra peut-être noter que j’ai demandé au General Manager de la CWA \nd’examiner personnellement la question posée par l’honorable membre et d’élaborer un plan \n\n80 \n \nde mise en œuvre en vue de réduire l’arriéré existant. Notre souci à nous, outre les 13 612 \ndemandes qui sont toujours en attente, nous avons en moyenne comme je l’ai dit un peu plus \ntôt, 300 demandes par semaine et avec la main d’œuvre que nous avons, avec les contracteurs \nque nous avons, nous arrivons à fixer que 240 cas par semaine. Donc, chaque semaine nous \navons des arriérés de 65 demandes. Donc, pour vous dire que la situation est un peu \ncompliquée, mais j’ai demandé à la CWA de revoir et je reviendrai à l’Assemblée nationale \nconcernant les mesures correctives. \nMadam Speaker: Yes ?          \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, j’ai bien compris que pour les zones du nord il n’y a pas \nde contracteurs. Je voudrais savoir si le ministre pourrait nous informer de la raison pour \nlaquelle les contracteurs n’ont pas été nommés, n’ont pas été appointed. \nMr Assirvaden: Les contracteurs ?                \nMr Rookny: Les sous-contracteurs n’ont pas été nommés pour les connections. \nMr Assirvaden: J’ai appris que le contrat était terminé. On a lancé un appel d’offres \npour le nord, mais cela n’a pas été concluant. Donc, on va refaire l’exercice dans quelques \nsemaines. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, one more.       \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, des 13 000 demandes toujours en attentes et des \ndoléances que j’ai de mes mandants, il parait qu’il y a beaucoup d’applications qui sont plus \nvieilles que deux ans, donc des gens qui ont payé pour être raccordés depuis deux ans, mais \ntoujours en attente. Donc, des nouvelles maisons, des gens qui attendent de rentrer dans leur \nmaison n’ont pas d’eau. Quand est-ce que les réaménagements vont être faits au niveau de la \nCWA, les équipes techniques seront basculées dans le nord pour qu’on puisse soulager nos \nmandants ? Merci. \n Mr Assirvaden: Je voudrais préciser à l’honorable membre, Madame la présidente, \nque vous avez des personnes qui ont demandé à être raccordées au réseau de la CWA depuis \ndeux ans, mais on a depuis cinq ans, donc depuis 2020. Il y a des demandes déjà de 2020 à ce \njour. Donc, c’est pour cette raison que nous sommes arrivés à 13 000. Il faudra graduellement \nréduire ce backlog. Ce qui se passe c’est que nous allons demander une chose, comme je l’ai \ndit un peu plus tôt, aux contracteurs de passer de 40 raccordements par semaine à 60 par \nsemaine, une chose. Deuxième chose, nous allons lancer un appel d’offres pour recruter \n\n81 \n \nd’autre contracteurs, des contracteurs qui ne sont pas dans le nord, mais qui peuvent sortir \nd’autres régions pour aider dans le nord, mais qui peuvent sortir d’autres régions pour aider \ndans le nord. Mais je dirais que nous avons aussi pensé à ce qu’une équipe interne de la CWA \npourrait aussi participer au raccordement. \nMadam Speaker: Now, we have the hon. Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and \nRose Belle! \nILLEGAL RALLIES & MOTOR RACING – LEGAL FRAMEWORK & \nMOTORSPORTS TRACK CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1071",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1071,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/1071) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the illegal rallies and motor \nracing occurring in public places and along public roads, he will state if his Ministry is \nconsidering – \n(a) \nsetting up a legal framework therefor with a view to reducing risks of accidents, \nand  \n(b) \nconstructing a car rally track for the promotion thereof and, if so, when and, if \nnot, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, motorsports, particularly rally and racing, are \nwitnessing a surge in popularity in Mauritius. This growing interest reflects a broader global \ntrend where young people are increasingly drawn to high adrenaline skill-based sports that \nrequire precision, discipline and teamwork.  \nHowever, Mauritius currently lacks a dedicated and secure facility that allows for the \nstructured development of this sport discipline. Motorsports enthusiasts often resort to \ninformal and unsafe venues to practice or compete, which presents serious risks both to \nthemselves and to public safety. \nThis Government, Madam Speaker, not only preaches, but also practices compassionate \ngovernance, and in the 2025-2026 Budget, the hon. Prime Minister and Minister of Finance \nprovided an amount of Rs6 million for a feasibility study on the construction of a rally circuit \nfor our young rally enthusiasts.  \n\n82 \n \nThe construction of a purpose-built motorsports track would provide a safe, regulated \nenvironment for training, competitions and recreational use. Such a facility would allow for \nthe organisation of authorised events under the supervision of the relevant sports federations \nand institutions, thereby ensuring that all activities adhere to national and international safety \nstandards and regulations.  \nMore importantly, the track would serve as a preventive measure against illegal street \nracing, which causes a growing danger on public roads. By offering an alternative legal outlet \nfor motorsports enthusiasts to express their passion for racing, the project would contribute \nsignificantly to road safety awareness, instilling in participants a culture of responsibility, \ndiscipline and respect for traffic laws.  \nThe project aligns with Government’s vision regarding youth empowerment, social \ninclusion and sports development. It would serve as a hub for skill building, providing \ntraining opportunities in mechanics, driving techniques, event management, safety protocols, \nand even entrepreneurship in the motorsports industry. \nMadam Speaker, a technical committee comprising officers of my Ministry, led by \nengineers from the Ministry of National Infrastructure and officers of the Traffic \nManagement and Road Safety Unit, was set up to draft a term of reference for the enlistment \nof the services of a consultant to conduct the feasibility study. Motor cycling clubs, NGOs for \nthe protection of road users and other stakeholders have been consulted, and the term of \nreference has been finalised. The consultant will be required to objectively assess whether the \nconstruction of a motorsports track is practical and likely to succeed in Mauritius. By \nevaluating its potential viability from various perspectives, including technical, economic, \nlegal, operational and venues generation, my Ministry is currently preparing the bidding \ndocuments which will be launched shortly. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Ramdass! \nMr Ramdass: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I thank the hon. Minister for his reply. Can \nwe have an indication as to the timeframe for the realisation of this project? \nMr Nagalingum: I cannot tell you about the timeframe, but all I can say is that the \ntechnical committee has been established. They are from senior management – technical \nofficers from my Ministry, project coordinator led by engineers of my Ministry, and \n\n83 \n \nrepresentatives of the Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit. The number of meetings \nheld so far is four: 22.07.2025; 13.08.2025; 01.09.2025; 10.09.2025. \nMadam Speaker: I am so sorry. I am checking my Standing Order. Yes, go ahead! \nMr Ramdass: One last question. Can the hon. Minister give an indication to the House \nas to whether a site has been identified for this project? \nMr Nagalingum: Not yet, hon. Member. The technical committee will do the \nfeasibility study. Then, they will tell us exactly where we can have the racing track. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Dr. Prayag. \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the Minister even consider having more \nthan one site available for such a project because it affects all the youngsters of our country? \nMany of them even lose their lives while doing illegal rallies? \nMr Nagalingum: Like I said, a speech was made in the Budget by the Prime Minister \nand Minister of Finance, and we are being given Rs6 million to do that project. I cannot say if \nwe can have two, three or more than one, but we will start by one. \nMadam Speaker: Alright. B/1072 has been withdrawn.  \nRIVIÈRE DU REMPART DISTRICT COUNCIL – ALLEGED MISSING \nSTREETLIGHTS – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1072",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1072,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1072) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the recent allegations of missing \nstreetlights worth over 3 million rupees from the Rivière du Rempart District Council, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether an inquiry has been \ninitiated thereinto and, if so, where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMINORS UNDER MINISTRY’S CUSTODY – CDU FOLLOW-UP & HOSPITAL \nOVERSTAYS’ DISCONTINUATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1073",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1073,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/1073) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the \nchildren placed under the custody of her Ministry, she will state – \n\n84 \n \n(a) \nthe program, if any, implemented therefor or follow-up thereof made by the \nChildren Development Unit once they reach 18 years old, especially, those with \nbehavioural concerns, and  \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given to discontinue the practice of admitting such \nchildren in hospitals over long periods of time in the absence of medical reasons \ntherefor.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/1058) \nMadam Speaker: So, now, I call Dr. Prayag, First Member for Piton and Rivière du \nRempart! \nMEDICAL BOARD DEPARTMENT – MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS – \nALLOWANCES - ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1074",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1074,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/1074) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity whether, in regard \nto the pre-Covid 19 practice of medical practitioners of the Medical Board Department of his \nMinistry carrying out medical examinations to assess eligibility for various benefits in public \nhospitals, especially, at the SSRN Hospital, he will state if consideration will be given for the \nresumption thereof and, if so, when and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Subron: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that under the current system \na medical assessment is carried out by medical practitioners of my Ministry to determine the \neligibility of applicants to the Invalid’s Basic Pension or Disability Allowance and Carer’s \nAllowance.  \nAs at date, there 345 medical practitioners employed on sessional basis, serving the \nMedical Unit of my Ministry. Assessments are carried out either by a medical board, which \ncomprises two medical practitioners or by one medical practitioner at the claimant’s \nresidence for those whose mobility is limited and who cannot attend the medical board. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that prior to COVID-19 pandemic, medical boards \nwere carried out in public hospitals, area health centres and in social security offices across \nthe island. The last medical board at SSRN Hospital was held on 09 March 2020 and was \nsubsequently ceased due COVID-19 pandemic. However, for patients who were admitted in \nthe Brown Sequard Hospital, medical assessment has been continued in the said institution \ntill date.  \n\n85 \n \nI am further informed that since year 2023, medical assessments are being carried out at \nthe Moka Eye Hospital and the Souillac Hospital for cases of visual impairments. Thus, at \npresent, medical boards related to disability benefits or pensions are being conducted in 15 \nsocial security offices in Mauritius and Moka Eye Hospital, Souillac Hospital and Brown \nSequard Hospital.  \nI am tabling, for the attention of the Members, a complete list of the centres. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to highlight that my Ministry is currently in the process of \nreforming the Invalidity Pension and Disability Allowance system. The conduct of medical \nboards in public hospitals has been considered in this context as it will facilitate access to \nmedical records of applicants. A first round of discussion has already been held with the \nMinistry of Health and Wellness. Once the holistic reform and its new assessment model is \nready to be implemented, we will then reevaluate the necessity of holding medical boards in \nhospitals or in some of the hospitals. Of course, in this context, necessary clearance will be \nsought from the Ministry of Health and Wellness. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nNow, the hon. Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle! \nHave I missed one? I am sorry one moment. Just I keep getting little papers about being \nwithdrawn etc., so sometimes I may lose sight. So, the next one is Mr Ramdass. But if I make \na mistake, you just tell me. \nROSE BELLE AREA HEALTH CENTRE – METHADONE DAILY \nDISTRIBUTION – RELOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1075",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1075,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1075) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the daily distribution of \nMethadone at the Rose Belle Area Health Centre situated in a residential area and the risks to \nthe safety of inhabitants and road users including women and school children, he will state if \nconsideration will be given for the advisability of relocating the distribution of Methadone to \nan alternative area.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, methadone is presently being dispensed at 23 police \nstation sites, five Community Health Centres, 13 Area Health Centres, five Methadone Day \n\n86 \n \nCare Centres, 7 Mediclinics, 2 community sites, 8 hospitals and 5 points in Prison Setting \ncatering for around 8,745 beneficiaries daily. The total number of dispensing points of \nmethadone including police station sites, healthcare settings, community sites, Methadone \nDay Care Centres and Prison Services is 74. At certain sites, there are two dispensing points \nand different dispensing times: 6 a.m. to 8 a.m. caravan and 9 a.m. to noon in healthcare \nsettings.  \nThe relocation of methadone dispensing sites from police stations to healthcare settings \nis one component of a holistic approach to the management of patients and opioid use \ndisorder. In that context, a national protocol namely, ‘Protocole de prise en charge de l’usage \nde drogue à Maurice’ was elaborated in March 2023 in order to come up with evidence-\ninformed management of people for those drugs at large in a comprehensive manner and also \naddress the issue of methadone dispensing. \nHowever, this protocol is currently being reviewed by a joint technical working group \nbetween the National Agency for Drug Control and the Ministry of Health and Wellness. Its \nobjectives, amongst others, is to come up with sustainable measures and solutions to \nmethadone dispensing issues in all its dimensions.  \nMadam Speaker, it is expected that the new protocol will help to empty our streets and \npolice stations of drug users, considerably reduce drug dealing, increase the safety of all \nresidents and treat drug users in a humane, ethical and effective way, enabling most of them \nto return to a normal life and professional reintegration. \nMethadone dispensing at the Rose Belle Area Health Centre has started in September \n2023 with two patients and is currently catering for 139 patients, both inside Area Healthcare \nCentre and in the yard to the caravan. \nMadam Speaker, my Ministry is well aware that the Rose Belle Area Health Centre is \nsituated in a residential area and the risk involved in that, there are problems of loitering, \nlittering and other anti-social behaviours of the patients during and after dispensing time. In \nthis respect, several meetings are being held with the police of the region to enforce security \nand to discourage loitering and anti-social behaviour during and after dispensing hours. \nMadam Speaker, my Ministry will certainly look into the possibility of relocating the \ndispensing point into another suitable area. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Ramdass! \n\n87 \n \nMr Ramdass: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I thank the hon. Minister for his reply. \nWhilst I do understand, Madam Speaker, that no one wants to have this activity carried out \nwithin his vicinity, however carrying out such an activity in a residential area poses risk to the \nsecurity of the residence. One possible option would be to relocate this activity to JNH \nHospital, will the hon. Minister be willing to consider that possibility, at least to give some \nthought, some consideration to that possibility? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister! \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, this matter is being looked into by the joint committee \nwill be set up with NADC and my Ministry. But I can tell the hon. Member that the question \nof putting back to the hospitals that is not something which is recommended because we have \npatients there, we have to look after patients, not after drug addicts only. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Dr. Prayag! \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Maybe the hon. Minister could consider \nshifting back, I mean, to dispense methadone, given that it has to be done under police \nsupervision, to do it in the police stations of the neighbourhoods with the staff of the Ministry \nof Health and Wellness? \nMr Bachoo: Even the Commissioner of Police is not of that opinion. Unfortunately, \nthat’s why we have got a joint meeting between NADC and our Ministry. \nMadam Speaker: You will find a solution! \nMr Bachoo: We will try to find a solution. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, one more Mr Ramdass and then Dr. Aumeer! \nMr Ramdass: I understand that this activity… Of course, I stand guided, I stand \ncorrected by the hon. Minister, but I understand that this activity is already carried out at JNH \nHospital, possibly identifying a specific area … \nMadam Speaker: Which hospital? \nMr Ramdass: JNH Hospital  \n… within the precinct of the hospital could be a possibility that the hon. Minister could \nenvisage? \n\n88 \n \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, earlier hospitals were being used for that purpose. But as \nI told you, it’s being discouraged nowadays because of the number of patients attending \nhospitals and even doctors are not agreeable to this. So, I have to find out certain suitable \nplaces where this can be dispensed. \nMadam Speaker: Aucun problème n’est insurmontable. \nMr Bachoo: Definitely, Madam Speaker, I told you we have got a meeting with NADC \nand my Ministry. They are trying to find out ways and means to solve this problem. It’s not \nonly in Rose Belle, in each and every area of this country, nobody wants these things to be \ndispensed near localities. So, we have to have to find places. It’s very difficult. \nMadam Speaker: Bon courage M. le Ministre. \nDr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: Madam Speaker, thank you. May I ask the hon. Minister whether if he \ncould liaise with NADC so that methadone distribution which has done its days – you will \nfind different methods of substitution therapy which no longer needs to have these people on \nthe roads on a daily basis? Try to, if you can, use your influence to tell them there are \nsuboxone and other drugs that can be used on a long-term therapy and have lesser people on \nthe roads? Thank you. \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I am not an expert in that. I will rely on NADC for this \nbecause they are experts, they know how to deal with this problem. \nMadam Speaker: But we keep hearing this. Thank you, Dr. Aumeer. \nYes, next question, Mr François! \nREPUBLIC OF MAURITIUS – CORAL BLEACHING EVENTS – IMPACT \nASSESSMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1076",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1076,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/1076) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister \nof Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to coral \nbleaching in the Republic of Mauritius, he will give details of coral bleaching events and state \nthe – \n(a)  actions and marine breakthroughs, if any, addressing same, and  \n\n89 \n \n(b)  assessment, if any, of the impact thereof on the domestic economy, namely, the \nfishing and tourism sectors.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: I will reply to the question. It’s a lengthy reply and all the information \nrelated is in the reply and it’s worth perusing it.  \nMadam Speaker: Can’t you table part of it? \nDr. Boolell: I will circulate it. \nMadam Speaker: You will circulate. Thank you very much. \nHon. Members, I am sorry. Of course, I keep being contacted by the lower Table. So, I \nhave to tell you that the Table has been advised that the following PQs have been withdrawn, \nlet me do that and then we will proceed. B/1072, B/1077, B/1079, B/1081, B/1086, B/1091, \nB/1092, B/1096, B/1100, B/1102, and B/1104.  \nI will have to check every time. So, B/1078 should be alright. Question of Dr. Prayag \nhas been withdrawn. So, now we have Member for Rodrigues, Mr Edouard! \nRIVIÈRE DU REMPART – CRUSHER RUN DISTRIBUTION – SITES – JANUARY \n2025 TO 25 NOVEMBER 2025",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1077",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1077,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1077) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the distribution of Crusher Run by \nthe District Council of Rivière du Rempart in Constituency No. 7, Piton - Rivière du Rempart \nsince January 2025 to date, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain and provide the list of \nthe sites where same was distributed, indicating in each case, the quantity thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUES – PUBLIC SERVICE – 243 GENERAL WORKERS DISMISSAL – \nCOMPLAINTS & RECOMMENDATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1078",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1078,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/1078) \nMr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister \nof Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard the 243 General Workers fired from the \npublic service in Rodrigues in 2012, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nOffice of the Ombudsman, information as to where matters stand concerning the complaint \nfiled thereat in relation thereto and the recommendations thereof, if any, on the way forward. \n\n90",
      "answer": "Mr Uteem: Madam Speaker, at the outset, let me point out that the question relates to \nthe Ombudsman as section 96 of the Constitution has not yet been amended and we still refer \nto Ombudsman as opposed to Ombudsperson unlike Ombudsperson for Children and \nOmbudsperson for Financial Services. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the Office of the Ombudsman that according to its \nrecord, no investigation was initiated in relation to the dismissal of 234 general workers from \nthe Public Service in Rodrigues. \nHowever, the matter was the subject of judicial proceedings and a judgement was \ndelivered by the Supreme Court on the 5th of March 2015. I am informed that following the \ntermination of employment, several former general workers of the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly appealed to the Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal which concluded that the \ntermination was in accordance with law.  \nThe aggrieved former general workers then applied to the Supreme Court for a judicial \nreview of the determination of the Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal. The Supreme Court held \nthat the Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear the appeal and \ndeclared the tribunal’s decision to be a nullity.  \nThe Ombudsman has also informed that in light of the said judgement the decision to \nterminate the employment of the temporary general workers emanated from the Public \nService Commission and in accordance with section 97 (2) (g) (iii) of the Constitution, the \nOmbudsman is not empowered to enquire into the decision of the Public Service \nCommission.  \nMadam Speaker, at the level of my Ministry, I am informed that there is no record of \nany complaint received from the former general workers recruited by the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Edouard, you alright? Okay. \nLet us carry on. Hon. François.  \nINTERTOWN GAMES – PARTICIPATING MUNICIPAL COUNCILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1079",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1079,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1079) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Intertown Games \ncurrently being held, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain the list of the – \n\n91 \n \n (a) Municipal Councils having enlisted and those not having enlisted athletes to \nparticipate therein, indicating the reasons therefor in the latter case, and  \n(b)  measures being envisaged to help urban authorities to make such an event more \nsuccessful.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nDIGITAL ACCESS INTRODUCTION – CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT – \nSTATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1080",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1080,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/1080) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister \nof Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in regard to the \nproposed introduction of Digital Access as an integral citizen right and the way forward, \nincluding the need for a constitutional amendment, he will state where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: Madam Speaker, as the House may be aware, my Ministry launched a \nDigital Transformation Blueprint 2025-29 earlier this year and this blueprint serves as a \ncomprehensive roadmap which is built on four strategic pillar and five enablers.  \nAs a government, we see digital access being of fundamental citizen right and which is \ndeeply embedded within the pillars and the enablers that feature in the blueprint. Universal \nand reliable digital infrastructure ensures connectivity while legal protections and cyber \nsecurity measures safeguard personal data and build trust. Meanwhile, the focus on digital \nliteracy equipped citizens with the skills that they require and these pillars, together with the \ncomprehensive ecosystem, where every citizen can fully participate in the digital economy \nand foster trust and confidence in the system.  \nIt is good that I point out here, Madam Speaker, that the previous regime promised a \nsmart Mauritius for a decade. Yet, they left communities without functioning digital services. \nTheir slogan was smart; their governance was obsolete. \nMadam Speaker, the House may wish to note that an interministerial committee has \nbeen established and my Ministry is monitoring and coordinating the implementation of the \nblueprint. We have also established a dashboard for every minister, the PS and SCE for every \nministry to be able to monitor implementation of the projects.  \nFurthermore, my Ministry is holding consultations with the relevant institutions to \nidentify appropriate reforms and to strengthen digital rights, privacy and data governance as it \nrecognises the necessary legal and regulatory frameworks are vital for guarantying digital \n\n92 \n \nrights. Half-baked apps, system that crashed, e-services nobody used; we, on the other hand, \nare embedding digital access into the governance framework as a right not as a marketing \ntool.   \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the Attorney General’s Office that amendments will \nbe made to the Constitution of Mauritius to better protect fundamental rights including new \ngeneration rights relating to technology in line with the Government Programme 2025-2029 \nand as reflected in the blueprint for ICT. So, the Constitutional Review Commission which \nshall be set up, shall look into the inclusion of digital rights as the fundamental right under \nSection 2 of the Constitution.  \nMadam Speaker, the previous administration created a two-speed Mauritius: the \nconnected and the forgotten. We refuse that model. They treated citizens as users; we treat \nthem as right holders. \nThank you, Madam Speaker.    \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. You are fantastic; you are very happy. I \nam happy when you are happy.  \nYes, hon. Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue, Mr A. Duval.  \nRAINWATER HARVESTING SYSTEMS – WATER STRESS ALLEVIATION – \nVIABLE SCHEMES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1081",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1081,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/1081) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to rainwater \nharvesting systems, he will state whether, with a view to alleviating water stress that impacts \non daily functioning and sanitary requirements, his Ministry will consider – \n (a) imposing a profit ceiling thereon to increase the accessibility thereof for domestic \nusage, and  \n(b) \nimplementing viable schemes therefor in favour of public institutions.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBAMBOUS VIRIEUX TO POINTE DIABLE – SOIL EROSION – DRAINAGE \nASSESSMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1082",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1082,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms",
      "question": "(No. B/1082) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre D'or) \nasked the Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms whether, in regard to the \nemployees and personnel of public health institutions, he will – \n(a) \nstate the number of health and safety site inspections carried out since 2020 to \ndate and table a breakdown of the number, nature and remedial actions taken of \nthe discrepancies observed, and \n(b) \ntable the list of trainings delivered to the employees and personnel of each public \nhealth institution since January 2025 to date, indicating in each case, the date of \ndelivery and number of employees/personnel trained, including their respective \ngrades.",
      "answer": "Reply: My Ministry, representing the State as Employer, has set up the Occupational \nSafety and Health Division in 1999 which plays a central role in ensuring that Public Officers \nacross Ministries and Departments operate in a safe and healthy working environment. \nIn accordance with the provisions of the Occupational Safety and Health Act 2005, and \nwith a view to ensuring the safety, health, and well-being of Public Officers, 32 Safety and \nHealth Officers/Senior Safety and Health Officers have been deployed across 92 Ministries \nand Departments, one of which is the Ministry of Health and Wellness. \nAs far as the Ministry of Health and Wellness is concerned, one Principal Safety and \nHealth officer and five Safety and Health Officers/Senior Safety and Health Officers are \nposted thereat. The Principal Safety and Health Officer assists Management in ensuring \neffective implementation of safety and health policies, standards, and strategies within the \nMinistry. All recommendations by Safety and Health Officers are submitted and emphasis \nmust be placed to the Ministry concerned for implementation. \n\n154 \n \nThe Ministry of Health and Wellness is divided into five regions comprising five \nRegional Hospitals, six Specialised Hospitals, two District Hospitals, two Community \nHospitals, six Mediclinics, 19 Area Health Centres, and 114 Community Health Centres. \nEach of the five Regional Hospitals is served by a Safety and Health Officer/Senior \nSafety and Health Officer. One of their main activities is to carry out regular Safety and \nHealth inspections in all Hospitals, Mediclinic, Area Health Centres and Community Health \nCentres including all worksites falling under the purview of the Regional Hospitals.  \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, the Occupational Safety and Health Division of \nmy Ministry carried out 5974 safety and health inspections in the Public Health Institutions \nfrom January 2020 to date. \nREGIONS \n2020 \n2021 \n2022 \n2023 \n2024 \n2025 \nRegion 1 \n175 \n229 \n204 \n235 \n277 \n275 \nRegion 2 \n128 \n220 \n254 \n191 \n174 \n251 \nRegion 3 \n91 \n163 \n222 \n235 \n130 \n256 \nRegion 4 \n97 \n256 \n259 \n135 \n213 \n207 \nRegion 5 \n74 \n124 \n210 \n262 \n139 \n188 \nTOTAL \n565 \n992 \n1149 \n1158 \n933 \n1177 \n \nIn 2025, a total of 1,177 safety and health inspections have been undertaken as at date \nand more than 1,300 inspections are expected by the end of the year. \nDuring these inspections, several discrepancies were observed mainly related to the \nstructure of building, poor housekeeping, outdated electrical installations, insufficient storage \nfacilities among others and actions are being taken to address those issues. A breakdown of \nthe nature of the discrepancies observed and remedial action taken is being placed in the \nLibrary of the National Assembly. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that, since January \n2025 to date, 446 officers have been trained on various safety and health topics to promote \nsafety and health at the workplace. The details of the trainings are being placed in the Library \nof the National Assembly. \nMy Ministry is currently reviewing the organisational structure of the Occupational \nSafety and Health Division with a view to strengthening its operational capacity, enhancing \nefficiency, and improving coordination across the Public Service. This initiative aims to \nmodernise and restructure the Division so that it adopts a more proactive, preventative, and \n\n155 \n \nresults-driven approach in fostering a strong safety and health culture in Ministries and \nDepartments. \nThe reform of the Occupational Safety and Health Division will also encompass the \ndigitalisation of its operations to enable the effective management, monitoring, and analysis \nof Occupational Safety Health related data across Ministries and Departments. This \ntransformation will support evidence-based decision-making, streamline processes, and \nstrengthen accountability in promoting a safer and healthier Public Service work environment \nin line with the objective of Government to provide welfare, safety and health to our Public \nOfficers. \nLIVESTOCK AVAILABILITY – PRICE ESCALATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1083",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1083,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/1083) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose \nBelle) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the segment of the \n\n93 \n \nroad stretching from Bambous Virieux to Pointe Diable along which resurfacing works are \nongoing, he will state if any geotechnical or drainage assessment was carried out prior thereto \nand, if not, indicate whether consideration will be given for the – \n(a) \nprovision of drainage facilities thereat to prevent soil erosion and water \naccumulation, and \n(b) \nconstruction of a retaining wall or protective structure to stabilise the slope and \nsafeguard the newly resurfaced road.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n“BY-CATCH FISH” – GENERATED TURNOVER – LICENCES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1084",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1084,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/1084) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nwhether, in regard to “by-catch fish”, he will state – \n (a)  the turnover generated from the sale thereof over the past financial year; \n (b)  regarding the licences issued therefor, indicate the – \n(i) \nconditions attached thereto;  \n(ii) \neligibility criteria to be issued therewith, and \n(iii) number of current licence-holders, and  \n(c) the details of licences issued since January 2025 to date, including date of \napplication and of issue, names of licence-holders and whether the licences were \nissued following any tender exercise and if so, give details thereof.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that \nthere has never been any record on “by-catch fish” turnover generated from sales. However, I \nam informed that the turnover generated for period July 2024 to June 2025 for the removal of \n18 Part 15 turn of “by-catch fish” fish from licensed foreign tuna long liners amounted to \nRs140,200 in terms of commission for the Agricultural Marketing Board.  \nMadam Speaker, I would like to highlight that prior to 08 August 2025, non-licenced \nforeign tuna longliners were not under any obligation to declare or sell the “by-catch fish” \nfish to the AMB.  \nWith regard to part (b) (i) of the question, I am informed by the Agricultural Marketing \nBoard that buying agents are appointed in line with section 11(h) of the Mauritius \n\n94 \n \nAgricultural Marketing Board Act 1963 under the conditions and responsibilities associated \nwith the appointment, include of tension of all applicable permits and licences having the \ncapacity to bear all operational costs associated with the removal of “by-catch fish”, \npurchasing, procuring, selling or otherwise disposing of “by-catch fish” on behalf of AMB \nand operating strictly within the commission structure approved by AMB. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) (ii) of the question, I am informed by the \nAgricultural Marketing Board, that the eligibility criteria for an entity to be appointed as \nbuying agent by the AMB are as follows – \n1. \nHolder of a valid Food Handler Certificate; \n2. \nFishmongers’ licence, and \n3. \nAn import permit for fish and fish products. \nIt is worth noting that prior to finalising the eligibility criteria, the issue was discussed \nand approved by Cabinet. Moreover, a buying agent must also be financially sound and \nshould have access to suitable storage facilities in line with regulation 4(2) of the Mauritius \nAgricultural Marketing (Controlled Products) Regulations 2025 and be fit and proper.  \nWith regards to part (b) (iii) of the question, I am informed by the AMB that currently \nthere are two buying agents namely Ecotropik and Aquarius Company Ltd. Madam Speaker, \nthe AMB received an application from Ecotropik Company Ltd on 15 May 2025 and for \nAquarius Company Ltd on 18 August 2025. The appointment as buying agent was effected \non 09 June 2025 and 03 September 2025 respectively. The application of the Mauritius \nFishermen Cooperative Federation Ltd will be entertained favourably once its new executive \nhas been appointed.   \nMadam Speaker, I wish to point out that no tender exercise has ever been carried out \nfor the appointment of any buying agent. However, in a spirit of transparency, accountability \nand good governance and contrary to previous practices, this government has now come up \nwith criteria for the appointment of buying agents through the promulgation of Mauritius \nAgricultural Marketing (Controlled Products) Regulations 2025.  \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, I understand that the former authorised agent, the \nMauritius Fishermen Cooperative Federation Ltd which has been the authorised agent for 20 \nor 30 years, had in fact, in 2022, in part of a discussion at his Ministry – he was not yet there \n– and it was decided then that it would not be in the interest of the MCFC to remove them as \n\n95 \n \nauthorised agent as it would lead to loss of jobs. There are minutes for that and it would \ncreate a financial burden … \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Every time, you are not asking questions.  \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, I have listened to the Chief Whip earlier; you have said \nnothing. \nMadam Speaker: I know! I am going to tell her as well. \nMr A. Duval: So, may I be extended the same leniency? \nMadam Speaker: Okay. For today, I am going to let you.  \nMr A. Duval: Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: It is true that the Chief Whip did the same thing. \nMr A. Duval: Yes! The question, therefore, is… \nMadam Speaker: Come with your question! \nMr A. Duval: The question, therefore, is what financial support, if any, or what \narrangements will be made for the MFCF now that it has seen itself, after 30 years, deprived \nof exploitation of by-catch? \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Dimann marsan pwason! \nDr. Boolell: In fact, if the hon. Member has paid heed… \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Chut! \nDr. Boolell: …to what I have said, I have said the application of Mauritius Fishermen \nCooperative Federation will be entertained favourably once its new executive has been \nappointed. I can tell you, in relation to what we are doing to bring onboard the federation, it \nwill serve the interests of the federation and fishmonger co-operative society contrary to past \npractice when one person had monopoly over the sale of fish. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, with regard to the... \nMadam Speaker: Question! Question! \n\n96 \n \nMr A. Duval: Yes, question. Figures are available. For 2019, the federation had \nregistered a turnover of Rs6.6 million. For 2022, Rs4.7 million paid to them. \nMadam Speaker: Question! \nMr A. Duval: In commission for the sale. Therefore, there are figures. It is a lucrative \nbusiness. \nAn hon. Member: Kestion! \nMr A. Duval: Now, that this has created a serious impediment to their revenues which, \nby the way, is used to be distributed amongst their members. They say a thousand fishermen \nbenefits from these.  \n(Interruptions) \nWhat is going to be made with regard to the fishermen who might now have been left… \nMadam Speaker: In limbo. \nMr A. Duval: Sur le banc de touche. \nDr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, ... \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: …ti nome par MSM. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Chut! \nDr. Boolell: Let me impress upon the Member that at long last, there is transparency \nand accountability. We expect the federation to be transparent, and it has been given the \nopportunity to be transparent, and it will be taken onboard. Contrary to the past practice when \nMr Seetaram was member of the Agricultural Marketing Board! Member of the Agricultural \nMarketing Board! \nAn hon. Member: Ala li la! \nDr. Boolell: The Agricultural Marketing Board was the body issuing the permit. He was \nsitting on the board and he had total control over those who were entitled to remove fish from \nthe non-licensing fishing vessel.  \nToday, we are widening the circle and giving opportunity to one and all because we are \nbundling the non-licensed fishing vessels, which means that the quantum will be much \n\n97 \n \nbigger. Therefore, the shares acquired will be to one and all. We have said priority is first to \nfishmonger co-operative society. \nThey all have obligations to serve first and foremost the fishmonger cooperative \nsociety. We are waiting, and I have said it, once they have set up their executive, the \nfederation will be taken onboard. We are going to entertain their application favourably.  \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, please! \nMadam Speaker: Question! Question! \nMr A. Duval: Yes. The hon. Minister must be clear. There are now only two private \ncompanies acting as authorised agents. This is not transparency.  \nNonetheless, Madam Speaker, let me ask the hon. Minister if he is aware that prices of \nfish, since the new framework in August, has increased substantially because of increased \ncommissioning being made now by those two authorised agents? Can he confirm whether the \ncommission that is supposed to be set up at the level of the AMB for deciding on the prices of \nfish has been set up, and who sits on it? \nDr. Boolell: The information being relayed by our friend is wrong! He has been fed \nwith the wrong information. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nDr. Boolell: Let me impress upon him that the committee is doing its work in all \ntransparency, and there is no reason to spread or to fuel rumours. Contrary to past practices \nwhen there was opacity in relation to activities being carried out by Mr Seetaram and his \nacolytes! \nAn hon. Member: Lerla li pa ti trouv nanye! \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Babajee! \nMr Babajee: Yes, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister, as he just said, in \nregards to Mr Seetaram… \nAn hon. Member: Bassoo! \nMr Babajee: …where everyone was saying misie pwason of the MSM regime. Will he \nstart an enquiry on the same person? Was there conflict of interest between the AMB and the \nby-catch? If there were irregularities, will actions be taken? \n\n98 \n \nDr. Boolell: I thank the hon. Member. There was blatant conflict of interest! Aan \ninquiry will be conducted. \nMadam Speaker: The question was: can you start an investigation? \nDr. Boolell: Yes! \nMadam Speaker: It is a new question. He asked for members of the commission. \n(Interruptions) \nDr. Boolell: The information will be circulated. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, exactly. Easy! \nI have finished with hon. A. Duval. Hon. Baboolall, First Member for Montagne \nBlanche and Grand River South East! \nMEDINE, CAMP DE MASQUE – MULTIPURPOSE COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1085",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1085,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1085) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether in regard to the construction of the \nMultipurpose Complex-one Stop Shop at Medine Camp de Masque, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain information as to the start and completion dates thereof, indicating the sum \npaid to the contractor as at to date and reasons for the delay thereof.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Health and Wellness (Mr A. Bachoo): Madam Speaker, the \nconstruction of Multipurpose Complex at Medine, Camp de Masque was approved in \nfinancial year 2023-2024 as a design and build project at an estimated of Rs62 million and \nRs25 million has been earmarked in the current financial year. \nThe building will be located on a land of an extent of 11,240 square metres owned by \nthe District Council of Flacq. In the meantime, the council is undertaking the construction of \nthe block wall by its in-house labour. As at date, up to 60% of the wall has been completed. In \nAugust 2024, the District Council of Flacq has invited request for proposals for the selection \nof consultants for design of a multipurpose complex at Medine. It was launched with closing \ndate 02 September 2024. \nTwo bids were received. However, after evaluation of the proposals, none of them were \nfound to be responsive. Given that the multipurpose complex will house different government \nentities, the District Council of Flacq intends to consult the relevant stakeholders before \n\n99 \n \nproceeding with the relaunching of the tender for a consultant for the design of the \nmultipurpose complex by the end of January 2026. \nThe works on the site are expected to start in August 2026 and completed by September \n2027.  \nELECTRICITY DEMAND – SOLAR SYSTEM KITS – PROFIT CEILING \nIMPLEMENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1086",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1086,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/1086) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the \nimpending increase in demand for electricity during the peak summer season, he will state if \nhis Ministry will consider imposing a profit ceiling on solar system kits aiming at \nencouraging investment therein thus reducing reliance on the national grid.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBOIS-DES-AMOURETTES – FOOTBALL PITCH RENOVATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1087",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1087,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1087) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the renovation of the football \npitch at Bois-des-Amourettes, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nwhether a technical assessment has been carried out to verify compliance with the initial \nproject specifications and standards, indicating if discrepancies have been observed and, if so, \nindicate – \n(a) \nwhether – \n(i) \nthe contractor will be required to carry out remedial works, and \n(ii) \nactions will be taken against anyone having condoned same, and \n(b) \nexpected date of coming into operation of the said football pitch.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Chief Whip! B/1088! \nPALMA – ST MARIE COLLEGE – REAR ACCESS REQUEST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1088",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1088,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/1088) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the St Marie College, in \nPalma, he will state if his Ministry is in presence of a request for the opening of a rear access \nto the said College that would open on State land, with a view to alleviating traffic congestion \n\n100 \n \ncurrently prevailing on Laseringue Avenue during school days and, if so, indicate whether \nconsideration will be given to granting such access on State land.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the Ministry of Local Government \nhad, on 03 October 2024, submitted a request to my Ministry for the creation of a new access \nroad from Palma SSS running along State land up to St Marie College with a view to easing \ntraffic congestion along Laseringue Avenue during school days.  \nConsequently, a joint site visit was carried out with the relevant stakeholders, including \nthe Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit to address issues pertaining to creation of the \nsaid access through State land. The TMRSU has made its recommendations in the matter \nproposing that consideration be given to utilising the existing road network of Palma VRS \nMorcellement as an alternative access to service St Marie College.  \nHowever, I am further informed that the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes has \ninitiated fresh consultations with the TMRSU to determine the most appropriate course of \naction in this regard. Accordingly, Madam Speaker, upon a decision being reached among the \nrelevant stakeholders and duly communicated to my Ministry, needful shall be done for the \nrelease or reallocation of the required plot of State land to facilitate the implementation of the \nproject through State land. \nThis is something which has been pending for a long time. Through the intervention of \nthe hon. Members of this constituency, I hope this is being favourably considered. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Question, not statement, please!  \nMs Anquetil: Yes! Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Je remercie aussi \nl’honorable ministre pour sa réponse sincère. C’est une décision qui aurait dû être prise \ndepuis longtemps. Le ministre peut-il indiquer à la Chambre si son ministère envisage \nd’effectuer un site visit des lieux afin de déclencher les démarches nécessaires ? Je vous \nremercie, Madame la présidente. \nMr Mohamed: Madam Speaker, as I have said in my reply, since the TMRSU has \nalready made recommendations with regard to the existing road network and then the \nMunicipal Council of Quatre Bornes has initiated fresh consultations with the TMRSU, it will \nbe for those institutions to communicate to my Ministry. \nNow, if there is the need for a site visit in order to decide on the appropriate portion of \nState Land that needs to be used for that very important project, of course, we will do the \n\n101 \n \nneedful and I will let the hon. Members of that Constituency be made aware of, for us to be \nable to be present there. \nMadam Speaker: Last question, hon. N. Beejan! \nGOODLANDS – SOCIAL WELFARE CENTRE – SPORT FACILITIES – \nRENOVATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1089",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1089,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/1089) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre D'or) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the Social \nWelfare Centre situated at Goodlands, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to whether the  renovation thereof is being envisaged, including the fencing \nand lighting facilities of the volleyball pitch, boulodrome or any other sport facilities found \nthereat and, if so, give details thereof and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Ms Navarre-Marie: Madam Speaker, I have been informed that no major renovation \nof the sports facilities at the Goodlands Social Welfare Centre is envisaged at this stage. \nThe Social Welfare Centre has two sports facilities, namely the boulodrome which is in \ngood condition and the volleyball pitch. The poles and lighting of the volleyball pitch were \nremoved in 2017 for upgrading works that did not materialised due to the withdrawal of \nsponsors and insufficient funds. \nThe perimeter fencing has also deteriorated over time. Due to financial constraints, my \nMinistry has prioritised urgent works across social welfare centres island-wide such as \nelectrical rewiring, waterproofing and slab replacement as well as expenses linked to evacuee \ncentres. \nConsequently, no dedicated provision has been made for upgrading the sports facilities \nat Goodlands although minor maintenance works are undertaken and social welfare \ncommittees seek support from District Councils and other partners for such projects. \nMadam Speaker, I am moreover informed that the newly appointed Social Welfare \nCommittee has initiated small-scale upgrading of the volleyball pitch including fixing the \npoles and net by end of November 2025, marking the pitch in early December and resuming \nday time practice by mid-December. \nAs for a more substantial upgrading, such as installing a new lighting system or \nconverting the pitch into a mini soccer ground, I wish to inform the House that the matter \n\n102 \n \nmay be considered when the budget proposals of my Ministry will be submitted for the next \nfinancial year. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes, hon. Beejan! \nI think we will stop here. I have, unfortunately, to tell you again a list. It is becoming \nvery complex. Since the beginning I have got so many questions that have been withdrawn. \nMaybe we should think about doing it in a better way. \nAnyways, I have to tell you for today, the following PQs have been withdrawn; B/1040, \nB/1090, B/1093, B/1094, B/1099, and B/1103. I am sure we can do better this time. \nThank you very much. \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that all the business on today’s \nOrder Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) Standing Order 10. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nSTATEMENTS BY MINISTERS \n(4.38 p.m.) \nWITHHOLD RELEASE ORDER – FIREMOUNT GROUP LTD –   UNITED STATES \nCUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION \nThe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations (Mr R. Uteem): Madam Speaker, \nwith your permission, I wish to make a statement in connection with the Withhold Release \nOrder (WRO) against Firemount Group Ltd issued by United States Customs and Border \nProtection (CBP) on 18 November 2025.  \nAs per the Withhold Release Order, the U.S. Customs will immediately detain garments, \napparels and textiles manufactured by Firemount Group Ltd based on information that \nreasonably indicates forced labour use. The Release Order defines forced labour as all work \nor service which is exacted from any person under the menace of any penalty for its non-\nperformance and for which the worker does not offer himself voluntarily. \n\n103 \n \n Madam Speaker, in its 23rd Annual Report entitled: “Findings on the Worst Forms of \nChild Labor”, published in 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor added Mauritius in the list of \ncountries where goods are produced by child labour or forced labour. Mauritius was added in \nthe list in respect to garments produced by forced labour. \nThis action followed negative reports published in 2023 and 2024 from Transparentem, \na non-profit organisation which investigated into labour abuses in Mauritius’ apparel \nmanufacturing industry which covered factories operated by Firemount Textiles Ltd. The \nreport highlighted labour rights abuses faced by workers in terms of recruitment fees; \ndeception; abusive working and/or living conditions; intimidation and threats; abuse of \nvulnerability; audit deception and deficiencies; and inadequate response to grievances. \nMadam Speaker, when I took office, I had a meeting with His Excellency the US \nAmbassador to discuss how Mauritius can be removed from this blacklist. \nConsequently, with the help of the International Migration Office, my Ministry came \nup with new regulations under the Private Recruitment Agencies Act to ensure the ethical \nrecruitment of foreign workers. \nThe Special Migrant Workers’ Unit of my Ministry is dedicated to address all issues \npertaining to Migrant Workers and to investigate all reported cases of abuse. \nWe have also taken a policy decision to ensure that no enterprise which is the subject of \ncomplaints for serious offences against migrant workers is allowed to recruit new migrant \nworkers. \nMadam Speaker, the report of the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) against \nFiremount Group Ltd is, according to the communique issued on 18 November by CBP, \nbased on information which reasonably indicate forced labour. Taken together, the evidence \naccording to that communique demonstrated that workers at Firemount Group Ltd were \nsubject to four International Labour Organization indicators: abuse of vulnerability, debt \nbondage, deception, and intimidation and threats. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by my Ministry that there have not been any cases of \nforced labour against Firemount Textile reported to our Ministry in 2025. On 19 and 20 \nNovember last week, officers of my Ministry carried out inspection visits to the two factories \nof Firemount Textile Ltd at La Tour Koenig and St Felix and interviewed migrant workers \nand members of Workers Council. They found no evidence of forced labour. I also chaired a \n\n104 \n \nmeeting yesterday with the management of Firemount Textile Ltd in the presence of officers \nfrom my Ministry where the representatives denied all allegations levelled against them.  \nMadam Speaker, the report of CPB was based on enquiries carried out before I assumed \noffice. I am aware that in the past employers used to repatriate foreign workers before the \nlatter could testify against them. The law now requires my Ministry to be informed before an \nenterprise can repatriate any worker. \n \nMy Ministry is working closely with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Regional \nIntegration and International Trade and the Mauritius Export Association (MEXA) to ensure \nthat Mauritius is removed from the blacklist of the US Department of Labor at the earliest. \nMy Ministry will not tolerate any enterprise that abuses migrant workers and tarnishes \nthe reputation of Mauritius. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister!  \nHon. Ms A. Navarre-Marie ! \n(4.42 p.m.) \nINTERNATIONAL DAY FOR THE ELIMINATION OF VIOLENCE AGAINST \nWOMEN \nThe Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare (Ms A. Navarre-Marie): \nMadam Speaker, with your permission, I wish to make a statement in connection with the \nInternational Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women which is being \ncommemorated today. \nGender-based violence, Madam Speaker, is fundamentally an expression of domination \nand constitutes a serious violation of human rights. It prevents individuals from developing \ntheir full potential, contributing to society and living with dignity. For too long, this \ndespicable crime was carefully hidden by society, concealed behind closed doors and \ndismissed as private matters.  \nThis issue has been brought to the surface thanks to NGOs and brave individuals. For \nyears, discussions, demonstrations and conferences have been organised, studies \ncommissioned and programmes implemented. There have been achievements, meaningful \nprogress that we must acknowledge. Yet, more remains to be done. While much can be \n\n105 \n \nachieved in isolation, much more can be achieved through collaboration. As Minister, I \nstrongly believe in networking, in the power of coordinated, multisectoral action where \nGovernment, civil society, communities and individuals work together towards our shared \ngoal.  \nThe theme of our national campaign which runs from 24 November to 10 December \nthis year is ‘Fam to pa zis enn viktim, to enn sanzman’ – ‘Women you are not only a victim, \nyou are the change’. It carries both a pledge and a challenge, it recognises women’s inherent \nresilience and leadership and calls upon our institutions, our communities and every citizen to \nstand united against this scourge.  \nMadam Speaker, almost every day, my Ministry is confronted with victims of violence \nand their painful experiences, the everyday horrors which they face. Data compels us to act \nwith urgency. According to Statistics Mauritius, a Gender Approach 2023, 7,177 domestic \nviolence cases were reported in 2023, out of which, 5,729 were targeted against women, thus \nrepresenting 80% of all cases. From January to June 2025 alone, 3,768 cases were reported \nwith 3,200 involving women victims. These figures are disturbing. According to UN Women \nand WHO research, globally, one out of three women has ever experienced physical or sexual \nviolence from an intimate partner at least once in a lifetime. Behind every statistic, lies a \nhuman story. \nMadam Speaker, misunderstood parental models, tragic personal experiences coupled \nwith the challenges and pressures that exist in our changing and complicated society, \nconstitute grounds for manifestations of violence.  \nHowever, I wish to reiterate the following: this Government has the necessary will to \nput an end to this heinous social scourge and it is high time to tackle this issue in a more \norganised, coordinated and comprehensive way.  \nMadam Speaker, while our current legislation does not classify feminicide as a distinct \noffence, we recognise it as an urgent national concern requiring targeted preventive strategies. \nIn that context, the Protection from Domestic Violence Act will be replaced by a \ncomprehensive domestic abuse legislation. This new legislation will reflect Government’s \nunwavering determination to fight against gender-based violence. La loi va être appliquée \ndans toute sa rigueur. This new legislative framework will align Mauritius with international \nbest practices. \n\n106 \n \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that since August this year, my Ministry \nhas established 12 Family Support Services Centres, operating as integrated guichet unique \none-stop shop facilities under one roof, bringing support for children, women and families, \nincluding psychosocial assistance, legal guidance, referral pathways and rapid intervention \nfor victims of all forms of violence, including online harassment. Our 24/7 hotline 139 \nprovides immediate crisis intervention, safety planning and connection to emergency shelter \nwhere necessary. \nMadam Speaker, while we must respond to violence with urgency and effectiveness, \nour ultimate goal must be prevention. Amongst other measures which my Ministry has taken, \nis to enlist the contribution of men, young men as allies against this scourge. Our positive \nmasculinity programme has enrolled as at now 25 young men who believe that man is not the \nproblem only but part of the solution.  \nMadam Speaker, eliminating GBV stands high on the agenda of this Government. \nThrough networking between Government, NGOs, civil society and individuals, we can \nachieve our goal, that is, creating a nation where every woman and girl lives free from fear \nand violence. During these 16 days of activism and beyond, let us all pledge not only to \nprevent gender-based violence but ultimately, to wipe it out and eradicate it.  \nOn a personal note, Madam Speaker, I will continue my task with compassion, justice \nand the vision of a safer Mauritius against all odds. I thank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much. \nPUBLIC BILLS \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, The Law Practitioners (Disciplinary Proceedings) Bill \n(No. XXIX of 2025) was read a first time. \nMadam Speaker: Perhaps now we can break for tea. Thank you. \nAt 4.50 p.m., the Sitting was suspended.  \nOn resuming at 5.32 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: You may be seated!  \n \n \n\n107 \n \nSecond reading \nTHE COURTS (AMENDMENT) BILL  \n(NO. XXVIII OF 2025) \nOrder for Second Reading read. \n(5.32 p.m.) \nThe Attorney General (Mr G.P.C. Glover, SC): Madam Speaker, I beg to move that \nThe Courts (Amendment) Bill (No. XXVIII of 2025) be read a second time. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, please. \nMr Glover: Madam Speaker, this Bill amends the Courts Act to simplify and \nstreamline the procedure for an application for a judicial review. Judicial review is one of the \ncornerstones of the rule of law. It ensures that the decisions of public authorities remain \nwithin the bounds of legality, fairness and reasonableness. It is not an appeal on the merits but \na review of the decision-making process. This is a common mistake. It enables the citizen to \nstand up and be counted when his rights are at stake. It gives him the opportunity to access an \nimportant judicial process. \nAnd because it is so important for the citizen, it became naturally important for us to \nlook at the process to render it more accessible, in line with the commitment of the \nGovernment to make justice more accessible to all.  \nMadam Speaker, as you are well aware, the courts do not have the power to second \nguess administrative decisions and change them because they believe that a different decision \nought to have been taken. That would be breaching the separation of powers. Instead, the \ncourts can only check the manner in which a decision has been taken and whether it has \nindeed been taken in accordance with the principles of fairness, reasonableness, equality and \nlegality. But just as the decision-making process needs to be reasonable, it goes without \nsaying that the review process itself must obey the same imperative. \nThe purpose of this Bill is therefore not to narrow the scope of judicial review, but to \nmake the process by which it is exercised more efficient, more predictable, and more \nresponsive to the needs of the citizens and of the administration alike. \n\n108 \n \nThe present process for judicial review spans two different stages. The first stage is the \napplication for leave of the court to proceed with the substantial judicial review application. It \nis only if leave is granted that the citizen will be allowed to proceed further with the second \nstage of the application.  \nIt is thus heavy, cumbersome and costly to the litigant citizen, and as if that were not \nenough, it often ends because the legal issue at stake is no longer a live issue.  \nThat is because the courts are loathe to interfere to stop and stay an administrative \ndecision pending a final decision after the hearings are concluded. \nFor too long, Madam Speaker, the first stage of judicial review - the application for \nleave - has become a source of delay and uncertainty.  \nCases have remained pending at the threshold stage for months, even years, before the \ncourt not could decide whether the matter should proceed to a full hearing. This defeats the \nvery purpose of judicial review, which is to ensure prompt supervision of administrative \naction. All this, Madam Speaker, obviously impacts, first and foremost, the citizen who \ncomes to court to obtain justice.  \nMadam Speaker, as far back as 2009, the Law Reform Commission had highlighted in \na Discussion Paper that judicial review, being part of the Supreme Court’s supervisory \njurisdiction, must be reformed to better operate as an effective control over the exercise of \npublic power. \nThe Commission observed that the two-stage procedure - first, leave; then, the \nsubstantive hearing - was necessary as a filter against frivolous applications, but that \nprocedural delays risked undermining confidence in the process itself. \nOver the years, it must be said that the courts have tried to apply these principles. Yet, \nin practice, the leave stage has become congested. Although applications are filed ex parte, \nmultiple affidavits are sometimes exchanged, and oral arguments are often heard on the same \npoints that will arise again at the merits stage. This duplication consumes judicial time \nwithout adding value to justice. \nThe present Bill, therefore, responds precisely to that difficulty. It retains all substantive \nguarantees of fairness but modernises the procedure. It does so by assigning the leave stage to \n\n109 \n \nthe Judge in Chambers, imposing clear time limits, and ensuring that once leave is granted, \nthe matter proceeds without the need for a further application which would necessitate the \nlodging of another motion before the court. \nMadam Speaker, allow me then to highlight the principal changes in this Bill. \nFirst, it inserts an entire new sub-part to the Act titled “Procedure to Apply for Judicial \nReview.” \nClause 3 of the Bill adds new sections 76B to 76J to the Act. \nUnder the new section 76C (1), an application for leave to apply for judicial review \nshall be made to the Judge in Chambers not later than 45 days after the impugned decision. \nThis clarifies the former requirement of “promptness” we inherited from our British colonial \nmasters which was felt inadequate as it was not informative enough and left it to the entire \ndiscretion of the court, leading to sometimes seemingly contradictory decisions.  \nThe delay of 45 days is not innocuous. It straddles the very limited delay of 21 days for \nappeals and the 3 months that was erstwhile taken to be the benchmark for delay for \napplications for judicial review to be initiated; it also follows consultations with the judiciary, \nin order to allow a realistic opportunity for applicants to prepare their case while still \nensuring expedition. \nThe idea here, Madam Speaker, is to allow concerned citizens the time to be informed \nof a decision affecting them, to retain legal advisers and to prepare properly for a challenge – \nwithout extending the period so much that any administrative decision is plagued with \nuncertainty for months on end. \nThe Judge in Chambers will consider the application inter partes, that is, with notice to \nthe other side, thus enhancing fairness and transparency right from the start. \nThe motion must be supported by affidavit, accompanied by all relevant documents and \na statement of case setting out the detailed grounds, the relief sought, and proof of sufficient \ninterest. \n\n110 \n \nThe requirement for a comprehensive statement discourages speculative filings and \nfocuses the court’s attention on genuine issues of legality in the decision-making process of \nthe public body. \nThe Judge in Chambers shall then determine the application for leave to apply for \njudicial review on the papers alone, but may, where he deems necessary, request written \nsubmissions on any point or, in exceptional circumstances, order an oral hearing in chambers. \nThis approach, Madam Speaker, reflects modern judicial review practice worldwide. It \nreduces unnecessary hearings while preserving the Judge’s discretion to hear counsel where \nfairness so requires. \nMadam Speaker, a binding time limit is being introduced in this Bill. The Judge in \nChambers must determine the application for leave to apply for judicial review not later than \n60 days after the case is in shape. If that delay is not respected, the matter may be reported to \nthe Chief Justice. This is a major innovation being brought forward by this Government. \nEarlier this year, in the Criminal Appeal and Criminal Review Act 2025, a time limit \nfor sentencing after conviction was introduced. Similarly, here, the court retains full \ndiscretion, but the timeframe serves as an incentive for prompt decision-making, not a \ndeterrent. \nMadam Speaker, Government intends to broaden the recourse to time limits in the \nupcoming reforms of the judicial process. The goal is to respond to a pressing demand by the \npublic for judgments to be prompt, because, Madam Speaker, as we all know, justice delayed \nis justice denied.  \nThere is a growing perception in this country that lodging a case in court to defend or \nvindicate one’s rights is so time consuming that it is often better to let things slide. Or that \nonly those with money and the ability to wait who can afford to go to court. This cannot be \nallowed to endure. \nAt the same time, Madam Speaker, this Government is acutely aware of the challenges \nfaced by the members of the judiciary and such reforms are not meant to unduly pressure \nthem.  \n\n111 \n \nLack of means, personnel and time are not imputable to the honourable and \nhardworking men and women who sit as magistrates and judges in our Courts. However, \nthere have been and there still are, some cases of exaggerated delay which simply cannot be \naccounted for. \nWhich brings me, Madam Speaker, to a question that will be hotly debated in the \nmonths to come, and as you say yourself, the question will be: is the imposition of time limits \non decisions of the judiciary an interference on judicial independence?  \nWould the legislator be overstepping the separation of powers when mandating such \nprovisions? \nThe first element of an answer is that the judicial function does not operate ex nihilo, \nthat is, conjured into existence out of thin air. No, it exists because there is a Constitution.  \nThe first element of an answer is that the judicial function does not operate ex nihilo – \nconjured into existence out of thin air.  \nNo, it exists because there is a Constitution and because there are laws that delimit its \nrole, its jurisdiction, its powers and its duties. It would, I submit, Madam Speaker, be \ntherefore absurd to denounce any reform of the legislator that affects the judicial function on \nthe basis of the separation of powers.  \nThe real question is whether the content of the reform does indeed curtail the \nindependence of the judiciary? \nMadam Speaker, here, I believe that an important nuance – often used word these days \n– is often lost. We tend to deal with the question in terms of absolutes when in fact it is a \nquestion of degree. \nWould a law imposing a time limit of 24 hours on judgments be a breach of judicial \nindependence? I submit yes - of course!  \nBecause by forcing Magistrates and Judges to rush through their decisions, one would \nbe curtailing their ability to effectively adjudicate the complex issues before them and expose \nthem to opprobrium or sanctions should they fail to meet this excessively demanding \nstandard. It would be simply unacceptable in a democratic society. \n\n112 \n \nOn the other hand, would a law imposing a time limit of, say, 12 months on judgments \nbe a similar evil? I think not. Citizens have the right, under section 10 of the Constitution, to \njudicial decisions being taken within a reasonable time. And, it is not reasonable for someone \nto have their life, their work, their goals and their means suspended for years waiting for a \njudgment with no deadline in sight. And yet, Madam Speaker, this is what is happening today \nin some extreme cases. There are judgments of the Supreme Court which are still awaited \nafter many years! Too many I dare say! \nThese two extreme situations, Madam Speaker, show that a time limit is not in itself a \nbreach of judicial independence or a necessary safeguard for citizens. It all depends on how \nreasonable the time limit is with regards to the type of case at hand, and therefore whether it \ndoes impose undue pressure on the judiciary or whether it simply prevents the most egregious \ncases of delay. \nAnd, this is why the 60-day limit has been chosen here for a determination on the \napplication for leave only. We believe it is reasonable, fair, and strikes a good balance \nbetween the independence of the judiciary and the citizens’ rights.  \nFurthermore, it is to be noted that the time limit starts from the day the case is in shape, \nwhich means when the Judge in Chambers has heard all parties concerned, and not from the \ninitial day of the application for leave to apply for judicial review was made. \nMadam Speaker, in this Bill, only one narrow right of appeal is preserved, that of the \napplicant who may appeal against the refusal of leave, but no appeal shall lie from the \ndecision granting leave. The rationale is very simple. The respondent will have every \nopportunity to defend the decision at the merits stage. Multiplying interlocutory appeals \nwould only delay justice. \nWhere leave is granted, the application for leave shall stand as the substantive \napplication for judicial review. No new application or filing will be required, and the grounds \nof review will be limited to those on which leave has been granted.  \nThe case will then be listed before at least two Judges of the Supreme Court, including, \nas far as possible, the Judge who granted leave, for hearing on the merits. This will ensure \nboth continuity and collegiality. \nMadam Speaker, pending applications will continue under the existing regime, thereby \nprotecting vested procedural rights. Finally, a number of statutes, including the Financial \n\n113 \n \nCrimes Commission Act, the Financial Intelligence and Anti-Money Laundering Act, the \nEmployment Relations Act, the Bank of Mauritius Act, the Extradition Act, and others, are \namended to refer expressly to the new procedure, so that all legislation speak the same \nlanguage. \nThe reforms, Madam Speaker, thus seeks to assist, not constrain, the Judiciary: to give \nthe Court the procedural tools to deliver justice more swiftly, while maintaining full \nindependence in decision-making. In fact, the judiciary has, in this particular case, Madam \nSpeaker, been amply consulted in the preparation of this Bill and the feedback received on \nthe final version has been positive. \nFor citizens and practitioners, the impact will be tangible. Applicants will know that \nthey must act within 45 days of the decision. Respondents will know when they must reply. \nAnd, both sides will know that the Judge in Chambers must decide the leave application \nwithin 60 days once the matter is in shape. \nThis will bring certainty, efficiency, and predictability – values that are essential to any \nmodern justice system. It will also relieve the Supreme Court of the backlog that currently \naccumulates at the leave stage, freeing judges to focus on substantive cases of real \nimportance. \nThe reform will also strengthen the confidence of investors, professionals, and citizens \nin the administrative justice system. When government decisions can be challenged promptly \nand fairly, it fosters trust in public institutions and, ultimately, in the rule of law itself. \nMadam Speaker, Mauritius is not alone in modernising its judicial-review procedure. \nBarbados, Trinidad and Tobago, and the United Kingdom have all moved towards written, \ntime-bound leave processes.  \nThe proposed new Sub-part VIA of the Act is in line with these international best \npractices, while preserving our own judicial traditions. \nAt a deeper level, Madam Speaker, this Bill reaffirms a fundamental principle: that \nlegality and efficiency must coexist. Justice delayed, in matters of public administration, \noften means injustice not only to the applicant but also to the wider society, because everyone \ncan be affected by the resulting uncertainty. \n\n114 \n \nThe Government’s broader programme for justice reform is driven by this same \nphilosophy. We are modernising procedures, clarifying jurisdictions, and making our courts \nmore accessible to citizens. The present amendment is another step in that process. \nThe Courts (Amendment) Bill 2025, Madam Speaker, is thus a useful and practical \nreform. It modernises an important area of administrative law while preserving every \nconstitutional safeguard. It brings clarity where there was uncertainty, and it introduces \ndiscipline without rigidity. Above all, it ensures that the right to challenge unlawful \nadministrative action remains effective, not merely theoretical. \nJudicial review is, after all, “the protection of the citizen against the abuse of power.”  \nThis Bill, Madam Speaker, strengthens that protection by making the process fit for the \ndemands of a modern Mauritius.  \nI therefore commend the Bill to the House. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, Mr Seeburn. \n(5.51 p.m.) \nMr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle): Thank you, \nMadam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker, I rise today to speak in support of the Courts (Amendment) Bill \nintroduced by the hon. Attorney-General. This is a Bill that embodies our Government’s \ncommitment in modernising and strengthening our judicial system, making it more efficient, \naccessible and fair to all Mauritians. A Bill that this Government brings forward with clarity, \nconviction and courage with a purpose of not to narrow the scope of the judicial review but \nrather to make it more accessible as stated by the Attorney-General in his address to the \nHouse earlier. \nMadam Speaker, our Government’s programme for 2025-2029 clearly prioritises \nreform of the justice system. We pledge to introduce a Judicial Review Miscellaneous \nProvisions Bill to simplify procedures and harmonise judicial review across the law under \nvarious enactment. During the debate on the Government’s Programme, we reaffirmed that \nimproving judicial efficiency, access and predictability is not just a legal reform but rather a \ncornerstone of good governance and public trust. \n\n115 \n \nMadam Speaker, too often procedural bottlenecks in our courts have caused delays, \nuncertainty and additional costs. Through this Bill, we aim to improve access to justice and \nmake our legal system more responsive to the needs of citizens and businesses.  \nMadam Speaker, for years we inherited a legal framework where more than 25 statutes \nreferred to judicial review in different styles, different formulations and different procedures. \nThe result of this is it creates confusion, litigation delays, procedural loopholes and also \ninconsistent remedies depending on which statute one happens to fall under. \nMadam Speaker, let us be absolutely clear. This Bill is about bringing order, \nharmonising our justice system and strengthening the supervisory role of the Supreme Court. \nMadam Speaker, Clause 3 of this Bill brings an essential reform to the way the judicial \nreview applications are handled. It provides that applications for leaves will be disposed of by \na Judge in Chambers, a model that enhances both efficiency and fairness. In fact, a Judge in \nChambers is already entrusted with urgent and procedural matters and this Bill builds on that \nexpertise by allowing leave applications to be decided on papers. Clause 3 helps to reduce \ndelays, legal costs and unnecessary formalities. \nAt the same time, Madam Speaker, the Bill maintains important safeguards. For \ninstance, where the interest of justice requires it, the Judge may call for an oral hearing. \nMadam Speaker, crucially, this Bill introduces a 60-day timeframe for the disposal of the \nleave application. This is reasonable and fair. Bringing predictability and preventing the \nstagnation of cases, reasons must be given when leave is refused. An applicant retains the \nright to appeal and this ensures transparency and accountability at every stage.  \nOn the other hand, Madam Speaker, if leave is granted, that same application becomes \nthe substantive application eliminating duplication, thus saving time and reducing cost. \nMadam Speaker, this Bill is clarifying jurisdiction. It is cleaning up inconsistencies, it is \nremoving interpretative ambiguities and ensuring that the Supreme Court is not shackled by \noutdated drafting from the past century.  \nMadam Speaker, Clause 4 is one of the most significant parts of this Bill. It amends \nover 25 different enactments and harmonises statutes that govern the health professionals. It \ngoverns the financial regulators, trade unions, Mauritius Revenue Authority, Financial \nCrimes Commission, Financial Intelligence Unit, Financial Services Commission, intellectual \nproperty, road traffic. It also governs reals estate agents, national transport, public bodies \nappeals and even United Nations sanction processes.  \n\n116 \n \nMadam Speaker, this government is doing something that the opposition never dared to \ndo – that is, establishing one clear unified legal path to the Supreme Court for all judicial \nreview matters.  \nThis Bill is ensuring that new leave based judicial review system is aligned across our \nlegal framework. Madam Speaker, these are consequential amendments and not arbitrary \nchanges. The Courts Act is being reformed. All of the statutes that refer to judicial review or \nsimilar procedures must be updated so that they refer to the same modern streamlined \nprocess. This harmonisation is essential and without it, we risk legal fragmentation, \nuncertainty and inconsistency in how different public bodies are reviewed by the courts.  \nMadam Speaker, by making judicial review more accessible and predictable, we are \nlowering the barriers for citizens, businesses and regulated entities to challenge \nadministrative decisions. By requiring leave, we are discouraging frivolous or vexatious \napplications, protecting judicial resources and ensuring that serious claims are given due \nattention. This process respects both efficiency and procedural fairness. It is striking a \nbalance between filtering weak cases and preserving rights.   \nMadam Speaker, some may question why Clause 4 amends so many different acts. Let \nme address that directly because this is necessary. When we reform the Courts Act, \nprocedures for judicial review, we must also bring into line all other laws that rely on or refer \nto judicial review cases; otherwise, we will have a mismatch. Some laws will refer to all \nprocedures, others to the new, resulting in confusion and inconsistent practice and litigation \nrisk. By amending more than 25 statutes, we are ensuring legal coherence. It is a structural \nreform giving certainty to courts, litigants, public bodies and regulators. In the long run, this \ncoherence will save judicial time, reduce appeals and foster public confidence in the \nlegitimacy of judicial review cases.  \nMadam Speaker, this is the demonstration of the government’s commitment to justice \nreform. By making judicial review more effective, we reaffirm that state decisions are subject \nto accountability and that citizens have meaningful access to legal recourse. The Bill does \nthree things. It is protecting the litigants from uneven procedural treatments. It is protecting \nthe judiciary by giving it a coherent legal architecture. It is protecting the country from legal \nuncertainty. \nMadam Speaker, the Bill is reinforcing the judicial review system. It is strengthening \nthe rule of law. it is making our legal system more predictable, more manageable and more \n\n117 \n \naccessible. It is the type of reform that a serious and responsible government brings. In fact, \nthis government is delivering modernity and not politics. \nMadam Speaker, before I conclude, allow me to thank the hon. Attorney General for his \ncontinuous significant contribution to our justice system and his team for drafting this \nprogressive piece of legislation that it reinforces our rule of law. We are doing what the \nprevious government never had the courage nor competence to do. This Bill is bringing \ncoherence to our laws, it is strengthening our judiciary and is standardising our access to \njustice in building a modern legal framework that Mauritius and our people out there deserve.  \nAbove all, Madam Speaker, this Bill is a modern, practical and necessary reform. This \nis how we deliver on our promise for a just, transparent and efficient court system. This Bill \ndeserves the full support of this House.  \nWith these words, Madam Speaker, I thank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. A. Duval.  \n(6.00 p.m.) \nMr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne Longue):  Yes, \nthank you Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker, the Bill purports to simplify and streamline the procedure for judicial \nreview. But, Madam Speaker, with utmost respect to the hon. Attorney General, I think that \nthis Bill does only half of the reforms that have been long recommended by the Law Reform \nCommission since 1995, reaffirmed, supported again, faced discussion paper in 2009, that is, \nthat we look at the procedure which this Bill is doing but also, at the substantive part which \nwe are not.  \nThe hon. Attorney General’s philosophy has been and rightly so to bring under one \numbrella legislation to put order into our legislative frameworks where it is necessary and to \nbring clarity. He has done it with the Civil Appeal Act, the Criminal Appeal Act being the \nlatest to consolated scattered provisions in a coherent umbrella statute. \nFor judicial review, Madam Speaker, the most perhaps constitutionary significant of all \nor as constitutionary significant, he does not do so. In fact, he is doing the opposite. He is \nburdening the old Courts Act with a complex procedural sub-part instead of following the \nlong-held recommendation that we bring one full-fledged statutory legislation for \n\n118 \n \nadministrative justice; an Administrative Justice Bill that addresses the procedure but also \nlays down the substantive part judicial review.  \nSo, the question, Madam Speaker, first is why has the hon. Attorney General chosen \nnot to follow the recommendation of the Law Reform Commission? \nWhy has he not thought it fit to bring in this Bill today clarity; clarity on the grounds \nfor making a judicial review and on the remedy that may be sought? \nGiven that our judicial review procedure has been based on the English Law Rule 53, \nOrder 53, which has now been itself modernised under the Civil Procedure Rule 54, where \nwe have the right to claim compensatory damages now. \nThe first point, Madam Speaker, with regard to the Bill, which I think the hon. Attorney \nGeneral should consider, is that of delay. Under the Bill, the aggrieved party has 45 days \nwithin the date of the decision of the administrative authority to make his application for \njudicial review. But the administrative authority itself has no duty to inform the aggrieved \nparty of its decision. Where the aggrieved party makes a request for the reasons for the \ndecision, pursuant to the principle of natural justice, there is no delay to do so under one \npiece of legislation. \nWhy are we then imposing 45 days down from three months, which used to be the case \nand which is the case in the UK, when we do not have a said delay for notification of the \naggrieved party of the decision of the administrative authority? One recent case which \nhappened under this Government was the demotion of Police Officers, for example, which \noccurred the day after the general elections. It was effected the day after general elections. \nThey were demoted and transferred, but were only served with their official letter a month \nafter. \nSo, one important amendment is to change the delay not to the date of the decision, but \nto the date of notification. 45 days from the day the applicant receives his notification.  \nThe second, Madam Speaker, is the duty – I said it – on the administrative authority to \ncommunicate their decision within a prescribed time and a set delay. We impose a duty on the \njudge in chambers, we impose a time limit on the Judge in Chambers to dispose of the matter \non the first leg, but we do not impose a prescribed time for the administrative authority to \neither notify or give the reasons for the decision. \n\n119 \n \nMadam Speaker, this is more so relevant in the absence of the long-awaited Freedom of \nInformation Act. Therefore, I hope that the hon. Attorney General will see merit in making \nthat small amendment – changing the date of the decision to the date of notification of the \ndecision, which will make a whole difference. If you take the example of the Police Officers \nwho were demoted the day after the general elections, they would have had nearly two weeks \nto make their application, given that the decision was taken on the next day and notice given \nto them a month after. \nThe third, Madam Speaker, is the right of appeal, that is, appeal to the Privy Council \nshould be as of right as per the Constitution, either on the first leg or the second leg.  \nMadam Speaker, if you look at the case of the Jacpot Ltd (Appellant) v Gambling \nRegulatory Authority (Respondent) (Mauritius), you will see that the Privy Council has \nclarified Section 81 of the Constitution as to who can appeal to the Privy Council on judicial \nreview applications and who can satisfy first, how do we determine the value as set out under \nSection 81 (1)(b) of the Constitution, of Rs10,000, when, Madam Speaker, you will agree that \nnot all judicial review applications can be valued in terms of monetary means. This what the \nPrivy Council said in the case of Jacpot, which concerned the case of the revocation of a \nlicense.  \nIt is stated that although the license might generate revenue, would have a value, the \nright to a license being a discretionary decision of the authority was not a right that the \napplicant had – a civil right –, but merely, he had the right to be treated fairly when deciding \non his application for a license. Therefore, there could be no monetary value attributed to that \nright. In the case of Jacpot, he failed in the first test of Rs10,000.  \nThen, there is the second which is found under 82 (2)(b), whether it is of general public \nimportance. There again, the application to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council was \nnot successful because they thought that although that right, important as it is, is a public law \nright, that is, the right to be treated fairly, it is no different from the right of any person with a \nrelevant interest who has to see the law applied. Therefore, it denied the application. It denied \nthe appeal to the Privy Council. In the case of Jacpot, having failed the monetary test and \nhaving failed the general public importance test, it had seen its appeal denied. So, the \nquestion is why doesn’t the Attorney General, who is simplifying and streamlining procedure, \ndeem it fit to provide as of right, the right to appeal to the Privy Council, given that in certain \ncases of judicial review, there are complex issues? \n\n120 \n \nLike in the case of Jacpot, there are many other cases that do not, on the face of it, \nallow an appeal to the Privy Council on a question of judicial review, as in the case of Jacpot, \nit concerned the granting of license. The same can be said for others who have applied for a \njob and who have appealed by judicial review.  \nThe fourth, Madam Speaker, is the issue of substance as per the Law Reform \nCommission Paper. I must say that the Law Reform Commission Paper, which is dated in \n2009, has given a very streamlined, concise, proposed Administrative Justice Bill stating \nclearly the grounds for relief.  \nThere were a number of grounds: excess of jurisdiction; unauthorised administrative act \nor omission, which was in anyway unauthorised or contrary to law; breach of principles of \nnatural justice; unjust, unreasonable, irregular, improper exercise of discretion; abuse of \npower, and fraud by faith. All of those which were to be found under one legislation. \nAs it stands under this Bill, you will find the procedure under the Courts Act. You will \nhave to go to case law for substance. And according to the Supreme Court rules, the law is \nsilent, we will have to go to England. How is that streamlining? How is that not creating \nmore of a mess, in fact? So, The Law Reform Commission had long pondered – 30 years they \nhave been recommending for one umbrella legislation. \nMadam Speaker, similarly, the remedies which include – I have said it – restitution, \ncompensation or damages in money, which is not permissible at present under our law.  \nThe Supreme Court has disallowed claims for compensatory damages in Mauritius \nalthough it is the case in England. Yet, the Law Reform Commission has recommended that. \nAnd, I would ask the hon. Attorney General why does he not think it important, now, since he \nis bringing an amendment, since he is attempting to streamline and clarify judicial review, \nsince it is an opportunity for him to come and, once and for all, to bring a modern piece of \nlegislation in line with the best practices that other Commonwealth countries have followed \nin line with the recommendation of the Law Reform Commission that have long pondered \nand which is here, why did he not see merit in doing so? \nSo, Madam Speaker, I think it is a missed opportunity to have a comprehensive law on \njudicial review. I think that we could have followed the recommendations of the Law Reform \nCommission again when it comes to the duties imposed on local authorities, on \nadministrative authorities. \n\n121 \n \nYou will see, Madam Speaker, if you look at the Law Reform Commission paper, you \nwould see that, for example, under Section 14 of the draft, you would have a request for \nreasons, there would be a duty. An applicant, an aggrieved party would be entitled to make a \nrequest for reasons to an administrative authority who would have by law the duty, the \nobligation to reply. It would have by law to provide the statement of reasons within a \nprescribed delay – 30 days as from the date of the request. Because what is the point of \nhaving a delay if the administrative authority can take months and years to furnish a \nstatement of reasons or to furnish his decision in writing. \nThere was the principle of natural justice enshrined in the draft legislation that the law \nrelating to natural justice would apply to any person/body granting, refusing, modifying or \nrevoking any licence, permission, qualification or authority or imposing any penalty under \nthe powers conferred by the enactment. \nSo, this is it, Madam Speaker. I am not inventing anything. It is here. It has been here \nfor 30 years; the hon. Prime Minister was Prime Minister then. He was again Prime Minister \nwhen they issued the discussion paper in 2009 and he is now Prime Minister again… \nMs Anquetil: Et il reviendra encore ! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Ça suffit! \nMr A. Duval: … and yet this Law Reform Commission paper has all but been wasted. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, to reiterate what we do need now is a stand-alone \nAdministrative Justice Act. \nMadam Speaker: You have said that. \nMr A. Duval:  Yes, codified grounds of review. \nMadam Speaker: Do not repeat, do not repeat! \nMr A. Duval: But I am just concluding, codified remedies, statutory duty on \nadministrative authorities to give reasons, statutory timeline imposed on them, a clear right of \nappeal to the Privy Council and, therefore, a modern administrative justice bill and then, \nMadam Speaker, I think that the country would be much better. \nThank you. \n\n122 \n \nMadam Speaker:  Thank you. Hon. Ms Collet! \nAn hon. Member: Mais, Joe quand même ! \nMr Assirvaden :  Joe tap lamin – bien egois ein ! \nMadam Speaker: Qu’est-ce qui se passe là ? Est-ce que l’honorable Ms Collet peut \nparler ? Elle vous attend la ! Allez-y. \n(5.53 p.m.) \nMs M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues): Merci, Madame la présidente. \nAujourd’hui, c’est mardi 25 novembre 2025, personne n’accepte d’injustice et de manque de \nraison. \nAlors, les exemples du passé nous rappellent pourquoi cette réforme est indispensable, \nMadame la présidente. Et nous avons cette demande de refonte du domaine du droit \nadministratif. \nNous avons vu des dossiers emblématiques de droit où la clarté des règles s’est perdue \ndans des délais excessifs. Et il a fallu attendre cinq ans ou plus avant qu’une décision \njudiciaire ne soit rendue. C’était vu comme normale. Mais nous sommes tous d’accord que ce \nn’est plus acceptable. Et même à Rodrigues, une région autonome, certaines décisions \npubliques ont été contestées, mais aboutissant après des années de procès et procédures \ncomplexes. Et, il me semble que les lenteurs judiciaires touchent toute la république. \nCes affaires ne sont pas des anecdotes, Madame la présidente. Elles sont le miroir d’un \nsystème qui laisse trop souvent les citoyens dans l’attente et l’incertitude. Notre justice ne \nrépond plus aux exigences de rapidité, de clarté et de proximité. Mais qu’il soit bien clair, ce \nn’est pas la faute judiciaire.  Nos juges, nos hommes de loi, notre judiciary staff sont des \nprofessionnels hautement formés. Ils travaillent avec rigueur et compétence. Ce sont les \nprocédures, trop lourdes et trop anciennes, qui freinent leur efficacité mais ils donnent de leur \nmieux. \nDepuis longtemps, nos concitoyens et même nos juges réclament une justice plus \nrapide, plus simple, plus proche. Nous n’avons pas été sourds à ces réclamations légitimes et \nraisonnables exprimées à travers la presse écrite et parlée – exprimées dans des débats \npublics, exprimées dans les attentes quotidiennes de tous. \nAujourd’hui, le moment tant attendu est enfin arrivé. Le projet de loi est la réponse \ndirecte aux attentes du peuple, des law practitioners ainsi que du judiciaire. J’aborde dans le \n\n123 \n \nsens des interventions de l’honorable l’Attorney General et de mon collègue l’honorable \nSeeburn. Avec votre indulgence, Madame la présidente, je souhaite mettre en contexte projet \nde loi. \nC’est un projet qui modifie la Courts Act pour simplifier et rationaliser la procédure de \nrévision judiciaire et non une refonte du fonds du droit administratif qui, je pense, évolue au \ncas par cas. \nCe projet de loi introduit une nouvelle sous partie, Sub-Part VIA, qui encadre \nclairement les étapes : la demande de leave doit être déposée dans un délai de 45 jours. Elle \ndoit être complète, avec affidavit, pièces justificatives et motifs précis. Le juge en Chambre \npeut décider d’un stay, c’est-à-dire suspendre la décision administrative contestée. Et le juge \ndoit statuer dans un délai maximum de 60 jours. En cas de refus de leave, un appel est \npossible devant la cour suprême. \nUne fois le leave accordé, la demande devient directement une révision judiciaire, et il \nn’y a plus de doublon. Mais qu’est-ce la justice, Madame la présidente ? La justice, c’est \nl’équilibre entre les droits et les devoirs. C’est l’institution qui protège le faible face au fort. \nC’est la garantie que chacun est traité avec équité selon la loi, sans privilège ni \ndiscrimination. \nLa justice, c’est le socle de notre démocratie et sans justice il n’y a pas de liberté \nvéritable. Sans justice, il n’y a pas de confiance dans l’État. La révision judiciaire est l’outil \nqui incarne cette justice. Elle ne juge pas si une décision est bonne ou mauvaise mais juge si \nelle est légale et juste. C’est la garantie que personne n’est au-dessus de la loi ni même \nl’administration.  \nJe pense que la procédure révisée est maintenant plus cohérente. Quand nous parlons \nd’administration, nous parlons de tous les services publics : ministères, l’Assemblée \nrégionale de Rodrigues qui agit au nom et pour le compte du gouvernement central, les \ncollectivités locales, les établissements publics comme les hôpitaux ou les universités, et \nmême les organismes chargés d’une mission de service public. Tous devront savoir que leurs \ndécisions peuvent être contrôlées vite et efficacement.  \nCe projet de loi, Madame la présidente, harmonise la révision judiciaire dans toutes les \nsphères de la vie publique. Il touche la santé, la finance, l’économie, les médias, la propriété \nintellectuelle, la fiscalité, l’agriculture, le transport, les professions réglementées et même les \nsanctions internationales. Ainsi, il prévoit, entre autres, que les décisions, par exemple, du \n\n124 \n \nRegistrar of Companies, du Tribunal de relations de travail, pourront être contestées par \nrévision judiciaire. \nLes décisions du Financial Crimes Commission, de l’Independent Broadcasting \nAuthority seront désormais révisables. Les professions réglementées – architectes, géomètres, \nquantity surveyors, vétérinaires – auront accès à la révision judiciaire en cas de refus \nd’enregistrement et de sanction disciplinaire. Les décisions du Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal \nde la National Land Transport Authority seront aussi soumises à la révision judiciaire. \nEnfin, Madame la présidente, ce projet de loi est un signal fort. L’État n’a pas peur \nd’être contrôlé. Il choisit la transparence. Il choisit l’efficacité. Et il place le citoyen au \ncentre.  \nCe projet de loi incarne une justice moderne. Une justice de confiance. Une justice au \nservice du peuple. Et, je remercie l’équipe du bureau de l’Attorney General, ainsi que \nl’Attorney General, pour leur écoute et réactivité aux défis du monde moderne dans notre \nrépublique. Je soutiens ce projet de loi. Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Merci beaucoup. Short, nice and sweet. Thank you.  \nHon. Pentiah!  \nMay I just ask if I am mistaken? I heard something about the date of notification and \nthe date when the decision is taken. Even under this law, the date of notification counts. Just \nto make things clear. \nMr Glover: Madam… \nMadam Speaker: Even the 21 days. \nMr Glover: Yes, Madam Speaker, I thought it was obvious to everyone… \nMadam Speaker: Of course. \nMr Glover: …but it seems that it is not obvious. So, we will address the issue later on. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, I have been in PBAT for 10 years, so I know. Hon. Pentiah! \nMr A. Duval: But your point is to clarify it. Make it obvious! \nMadam Speaker: Mais, c’est clair… \nMr A. Duval: That is the point! \nMadam Speaker: C’est évident. C’est déjà la loi. \n\n125 \n \n(6.24 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms (Mr L. Pentiah): \nMadam Speaker, I was going to say at the very outset – with your permission – that I was \nblessed that both Members of the Opposition were present for a change, then one just walks \nout. But then again, I am honoured to have at least one Member of the Opposition at this hour \nof work, still in the House. \nMadam Speaker: Get on with your speech! \nMr Pentiah: Madam Speaker, to address two things; concerning the notification, the \nAttorney General will duly address but concerning clarity on grounds and clarity on remedy, \ntwo issues raised during the intervention of the hon. Member of the Opposition. Well, \ngrounds and remedy are clear for judicial review. This is the ABC of law of judicial review. \nAnd, Madam Speaker, shall I start? I start my intervention with a quote from \nMontesquieu, the architect of the doctrine of separation of powers who wrote in The Spirit of \nLaws, and I quote – \n“There is no crueller tyranny than that which is perpetuated under the shield of the law \nand in the name of justice.” \nMadam Speaker, these powerful words capture the very spirit of what we are debating \ntoday. Already, the 28th Bill of this year. This Bill is about preserving one of the most \nfundamental pillars of our democracy, the right of every citizen of this country to challenge, \nby way of judicial review, the decisions of the Executive and our public authorities. Indeed, \njudicial review is the living expression of Montesquieu’s doctrine of separation of powers. It \nis the means through which the Judiciary ensures that the Executive remains within the \nparameters of the law and the decisions taken by those in power are lawful, reasonable and \nfair. \nMadam Speaker, this Bill is a safeguard that ensures that power does not turn into \ntyranny, that authorities excise with accountability and that justice remains within the reach \nof the people to seek redress where applicable. Our Constitution enshrines this safeguard first \nand foremost in clear and noble terms. Section 3 guarantees to every citizen the protection of \nthe law, a phrase that has long been interpreted by our Courts to include the right to seek \njustice and to challenge unlawful administrative action. Section 17 of our Constitution \nprovides that when a person alleges that his fundamental rights have been, are being or are \nlikely to be contravened, he may apply directly to the Supreme Court for redress. \n\n126 \n \nSection 17(2) of our Constitution vests the Supreme Court with the jurisdiction to make \nsuch orders, issue such writs and give such directions as it may consider appropriate, \nincluding the very prerogative remedies that form the heart of judicial review, such as \ncertiorari, mandamus prohibition or declaration. These provisions together give life to the \nprinciple that justice must always remain accessible, enforceable and impartial. Judicial \nreview, Madam Speaker, is therefore not a mere procedural tool. It is also a constitutional \nright guaranteed to every Mauritian. \nHistory has shown, Madam Speaker, that whenever the Executive acts without proper \nchecks and balances, the rule of law is fettered and public confidence in institutions erode. \nThe previous government, having sown the seeds of unfairness and disregard for due process, \ntasted the bitter taste of the fruit of their own poison at the last general elections. That is why \nthis amendment to streamline the judicial review process assumes all its importance. It \nensures that the mistakes of the past cannot be repeated, that power is subject to the discipline \nof law and that fairness and accountability are restored at the heart of governance. The \nExecutive must govern, yes, but it must do so within the limits of law and under the scrutiny \nof justice. The previous government on too many occasions acted in ways that defied the \nprinciples of fairness, procedural propriety and impartiality. Appointments and promotions \nwere influenced, disciplinary actions were taken without the right to be heard and decisions \nwere marked by bias and procedural irregularities. Many of these were decisions amenable to \njudicial review but the reality is that for many citizens, that route was simply out of reach; not \nbecause justice was unavailable but because it was unaffordable, intimidating and painfully \nslow. \nAs Minister of the Public Service and Administrative Reforms, I have met countless \nofficers who have suffered in silence, dedicated men and women who are unfairly bypassed \nfor appointment or promotion, officers who met every qualification, who have the experience, \nthe dedication and the integrity, yet were overlooked without explanation. When asked, very \noften the reply was ‘I could not afford it’, some even silently added ‘I was afraid of \nretribution by the tyranny of those in power’. \nMadam Speaker, ‘time is money’. This adage could not be truer than in this context. \nThe longer the process, the higher the cost, to such an extent that judicial review runs the risk \nto be the privilege of the few when it should be a right of all. I have even known cases where \npublic officers who had the courage to bring the cases to Court, saw their proceedings \ndragged on for so long that they retired before judgement was delivered and in some tragic \n\n127 \n \ninstances, they passed away before justice could be served. Those cases were struck off as no \nlonger live matters but, Madam Speaker, for the victims and their families, the injustice lives \non. \nIt is therefore with deep satisfaction that I welcome the Courts (Amendment) Bill (No. \nXXVIII of 2025) brought before this House by the Attorney General. This Bill is a turning \npoint, it brings long awaited reform to the judicial review process, a reform that will make the \nsystem faster, simpler and fairer. For many of our citizens, including public officers, there is \nnow light at the end of the tunnel. Judicial review will no longer be the privilege of the few \nbut a right within the reach of all. The problem we are addressing through this Bill is well \nknown. The current process of judicial review has become too lengthy, too costly and often \nnot accessible.  \nWhat we endeavour as a responsible government and what this Bill delivers is a \nstreamlined process that reduces time and cost, simplifies access and ensures that citizens can \nchallenge unfair administrative decisions without being overwhelmed by complexity or \ndelay.  \nThe first stage – the test of arguability, where the court decides whether the applicant \nhas an arguable case with a little prospect of success. The second stage, that is, the \nsubstantive hearing where the case is fully heard and court decides whether the public body \nacted lawfully, fairly and rationally. Madam Speaker, in practice, as we have said, the first \nstage has become unnecessarily complicated. Hearings are often conducted in open court, \noral submissions are made, affidavits are exchanged, and most cases, two or more judges sit \nto deliver a written judgement, sometimes many months later at the very first leave stage. \nThis is time consuming. This is costly and contrary to the very purpose of the leave stage \nwhich is meant only as a preliminary filter.  \nAs noted in the case of Mohit v. The Director of Public Prosecutions of Mauritius \n(Mauritius) [2006] UKPC 20 and echoed in several Supreme Court judgments, the leave \nstage should be determined on a cursory glance at the material to decide whether there is an \narguable case. Yet, the leave stage has become a trial before a trial. A trial before the trial. \nThat is what this Bill seeks to correct. \nUnder the new part Sub-Part VIA of the Courts Act, the judicial review process will \nnow be modern, efficient, accessible – \n\n128 \n \n(i) \nthe time limit from 90 days to 45 days, encouraging prompt action and certainty; \n(ii) \nthe Judge in Chambers will determine the application inter partes on the papers \nalone, without open court hearings, except in exceptional circumstances. Here, \nagain, the discretion of the court is preserved; \n(iii) the Judge must deliver a decision within 60 days, bringing long-awaited \ntimeliness to the process; \n(iv) where leave is granted, the same application stands at the substantive hearing, \navoiding duplication and saving time; \n(v) \nwhere leave is refused, an appeal can now be made to the Supreme Court under \nthe Civil Appeal Act 2025 instead to the Privy Council. \nPerhaps, the hon. Member of the Opposition should have read this part instead of \nproposing that we should go to the Privy Council. \nMadam Speaker, these reforms transform judicial review from a distinct costly \nprocedure into a fair, efficient and accessible remedy for the people. With this Bill, Mauritius \nstands alongside many other jurisdictions, embracing a modern and citizen-centred model of \nadministrative justice. The Courts (Amendment) Bill 2025 is more than a judicial reform. It is \na reaffirmation of our constitutional values of fairness and accountability, of reaffirming that \nthis is a land where the rule of law prevails. \nThis Bill says to every Mauritian that justice will no longer depend on wealth or \nendurance. It will depend on right and reason. With this Bill, the Government is making \njustice affordable, swift and fair. We are ensuring that those aggrieved by decisions of public \nbodies suffer the least possible prejudice. We are fulfilling our solemn duty as a caring and \nresponsible government that justice must not only be done – as rightly said by the Attorney \nGeneral –, it must be seen to be done.  \nAt the pace at which our justice system is being reformed, I have no doubt, Madam \nSpeaker, that Mauritius will soon stand as a model of democracy; a nation where the rule of \nlaw will again prevail, where justice is within the reach of every citizen and where our \ndemocratic values are not merely proclaimed, but lived. \n\n129 \n \nMadam Speaker, I shall conclude with the very words of Lord Denning, affectionately \nremembered as the people’s judge. He propounded, ‘If the citizen is to have confidence in the \nlaw, he must be able to challenge the acts of the Executive without fear or excessive cost. \nJustice must be open to all.’ \nMadam Speaker, this is a promise of this Government. This is a path to a fairer \nMauritius. With these words, I commend the Bill to the House. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister of Labour! \n(6.40 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations (Mr R. Uteem): Madam Speaker, \nthe Bill before this House is part of a series of Bills that have been introduced in Parliament \nsince the beginning of the year to improve access to justice and ensure a speedier and more \neffective dispute resolution mechanism. This is in line with the Government’s commitment, \nas announced in the Presidential Address earlier in January, to introduce reforms to ensure \nthat the judicial and legal system operate more efficiently, swiftly, fairly and make justice \nmore accessible.  \nI am not going to set out the long list of amendments that have been brought to various \nlegislations, ranging from the Financial Crimes Commission through the new Revenue \nTribunal Act and amendments to the Criminal Appeal and Criminal Review Act and the Civil \nAppeal Act. Suffice it to say, Madam Speaker, I would like to put on record the brilliant work \ndone by the hon. Attorney General and his team at the State Law Office to pilot these \nreforms. As a leading senior counsel, the hon. Attorney General has first-hand experience of \nthe hurdles and procedural rigidities which all too often result in lengthy and costly \nproceedings, abuse of process and denial of justice.  \nMadam Speaker, the object of this Bill is to simplify and streamline the procedure for \nan application for judicial review. As has been aptly stated by the hon. Attorney General, \njudicial review is the fundamental means by which the Judiciary calls the Executive and the \npublic bodies to account, and make sure that they exercise their authority within the limit of \nthe powers and remain accountable under the rule of law. Judicial review is an important \ncomponent of the check and balances enshrined in our Constitution. For example, if a citizen \nhas applied for a licence and has not received his licence, usually, he will go by way of \n\n130 \n \njudicial review to review the decision of the Minister. Similarly, if he has been denied a \nlicence by the local authorities, he would usually go by way of judicial review. For certain \nappointments by the Local Government Service Commission and PSC, again, the remedy \nwould be to go by way of judicial review.  \nNow, I am very surprised by what hon. Adrien Duval stated. He started by stating that \nthe hon. Attorney General missed an opportunity to review the substantive law, and he relies \non the Law Reform Commission. I have had a quick glance at the Law Reform Commission’s \ndiscussion paper on judicial review, published in November 2009, which annexes a draft \nAdministrative Justice Bill which was borrowed from the Barbados Administrative Justice \nBill. I have gone through the grounds which is set out in section 5 of that draft Bill and I am \nsorry but all of the grounds that are set out in that Act is already grounds for asking a judicial \nreview to the court. \nMadam Speaker: Exactly! \nMr Uteem: So, the Act only codified what exist in our law. So, what is the point of \nputting restrictions on the judiciary for grounds under which they can review an \nadministrative decision, because there may be in the future other grounds that may be \ndeveloped through judicial pronouncements? So, I don’t think that there is any reason why \nthis legislation should curtail the right of the judiciary when it comes to the grounds on which \nto review administrative decision.  \nSimilarly, when I look at the remedies provided in that draft legislation, these are \nalready remedies that are applied consistently by the courts in Mauritius. Now, the only \nnuance on what hon. Adrien Duval stated is about damages, but again, damages in \nexceptional circumstances is awarded in England and, I am sure, in cases which befit it – an \naward of damages which is quite exceptional because judicial review by its nature itself \nconcerns the review of the decision-making process as opposed to the decision itself. So, it \nwill be extremely rare that in a case of judicial review, the court would award a monetary \ncompensation.  \nBut what I found even more shocking is that the hon. Member, who chose not to be \npresent when we reply to his address, started by saying that the hon. Attorney-General \nadopted to, and I quote – \n“A complex procedural system.” \n\n131 \n \nIn fact, it is the complete opposite, Madam Speaker. This Bill is going to substantially \nsimplify matters as when it comes to judicial review. As the Attorney-General mentioned, we \nhave two steps when it comes to judicial review. First, the citizen, the aggrieved party must \napply for leave to bring judicial review, this is the first stage, the leave stage. Then, once he \nhas been granted the leave, he goes to the second stage, which is the main part of the judicial \nreview, where the decision on the merit is considered and determined.  \nNow, there is a fair amount of confusion as to what happens at leave stage. At leave \nstage, what should really happen is that the court should only determine on a quick perusal of \nthe material available, if there is an arguable case with a realistic prospect of success – a very \nlow threshold. At the leave stage, the court may dismiss applications which are frivolous, \nvexatious or hopeless. \nSo, at leave stage, the role of the judiciary is to act as a filter and throw away all those \nunmeritorious cases, ex-facie the evidence produced. Now, what happen in reality, in \npractice? Unfortunately, depending on the lawyers, there are extensive exchanges of \naffidavits and counter-affidavits and preliminary point and objection and just at the leave \nstage, the procedure drags on for weeks and for weeks and this result necessary in denial of \njustice.  \nSo, what is the Attorney-General doing with this Bill? First of all, the procedure before \nleave, at the moment we have to go before two judges and that takes time. This is being \nreplaced: leave stage – you go to a judge in Chambers. Judge in Chambers usually have \njurisdiction when you have to expedite matters; when there are matters which call for prompt \ndecision, you go to a judge in Chambers and obviously, it is easier for a judge, sitting alone, \nto decide on an application than two judges sitting in an open court. \nSecond procedure that is being simplified. Everything has to be in your affidavit, in \nyour written material in front of the judge in Chambers. Exceptionally, the judge can ask for \nwritten submission and even more exceptionally, he can ask for oral submission. So, in \npractice, this is bound to be a speedier process than it is today. But to ensure that it is the \nspeedier process, the hon. Attorney-General has inserted a clause which imposes a time limit \nwithin which the honourable judge must give his determination, and that is 60 days from the \nclose of pleading, from the close of the hearing, if there is a hearing. And, the Bill goes even \nfurther and you can even complain to the Chief Justice if the judge in Chamber misses that \nfirst 60 days delay. \n\n132 \n \nA second way where we are simplifying the system and bringing certainty is the delay \nwithin which you can apply for judicial review. And, here I completely don’t connect with the \nhon. Member who is a barrister. So, he is supposed to know the law. I can understand many \nMembers here who are not well versed in law who can maybe make a comment as stupid as \nsaying that the time limit to bring judicial proceeding is three months and now you read it, \nyou are reducing it to only 45 days.  \nBut there is a long list of cases, Madam Speaker, where the court has systematically \nheld that the three months’ delay is not the applicable criteria. Applicable criteria is \npromptness. You need to promptly bring an application for judicial review and this is where \nwe have a problem because the courts are inconsistent when it comes to determining what \namounts to promptness. Is it six weeks? Is it a month? Is it two months? Is it 21 days? There \nhas been consistently contradictory judgement and not only at the level of the Supreme Court \nbut all the way to the Privy Council. And in the Privy Council and at least two decisions, the \nlaw lords restated the rule. The rule is that you have to bring judicial review as promptly as \npossible and what is prompt will depend on a case-by-case basis, depending on the facts and \ndepending on the explanation given by the applicant for the delay, if any, to bring \nproceedings. Now, what we are doing today is removing this uncertainty as to what amounts \nto promptness. We are staying in the law – 45 days, that’s it.  \nNow there is certainty, everybody knows that you have to apply for judicial review \nwithin 45 days of a decision. And what are we doing? In section 4, we are amending all the \nlaws, a series of laws, which had contradictory delays for applying for judicial review. There \nare some decisions which requires you to do judicial review within 21 days. There are some \nstatutes which requires judicial review to be lodged within 28 days. There are some statutes \nwhich does not even provide a statutory timeframe; it just tells you that you can appeal by \nway of judicial review against the administrative decision. So, now we are bringing certainty. \nWhether it is an appeal against a decision of the Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal, whether it is \nthe appeal against a decision of the Mauritian Revenue Authority, all appeals by way of \njudicial review to date will have to lodged within 45 days. \nNow, how can that be a problem? How can that be disputed? How can that be creating \nuncertainty or penalising the applicant? So, that is why I simply cannot understand a barrister \ntelling you that when you produce certainty by giving a timeframe, this will necessarily be \nsomething bad.  \n\n133 \n \nThe 60-day delay, why is it important? It is important, Madam Speaker, because I will \ngive you an example of a case for which the judgement has just been given this year and that \nrelates to a lecturer who had decided to appeal against decision of the University of \nMauritius. In that case, the application for leave for judicial review was lodged in February \n2018. Judgement, on leave stage, – I am not talking about the second stage but on leave stage \n– was delivered on the 09 September 2025, two months ago, that is, seven years. And by the \ntime, the judges gave their decisions, there was no live issue. There was no live issue because \nthe poor applicant had retired and the question of giving him a promotion was no longer a \nlive issue. So, this is the type of abuse that we are trying to meet today by bringing this time \nlimit of 60 days in order for judges to give their decision.  \nThe other very important amendment that is being brought, Madam Speaker, is the new \nsection 76(h) which deals with the second leg. Now, as the law stands today, after having \ngone through the process of leave, after having obtained leave, you have to start from scratch \nagain. The applicant has to swear a new affidavit, annex new series of documents and \nproduce it. Sometimes, you have boxes of pleadings that are being thrown to the judges, \nduplicity in materials. \nSo, now what we are saying is that in this new law, if the Judge in Chambers ex facie of \nthe pleadings, sees that you have a good arguable case that deserve to go to the next stage, \nyou don’t need to file a new set of affidavits. This affidavit, these documents that are being \nfiled to the Judge in Chambers in the first instance, in the next stage, this would be the basis \nfor the second stage; for the stage where the judges will consider the application on the merit.  \nAnd, again, I don’t understand the hon. Member. He says that we should have put the \nright to appeal to the Privy Council. This is why we have the decision held by two judges so \nthat precisely you can apply to the judicial committee of the Privy Council. And he thinks \nthat it is not as of right. Let me just read the first sentence of the judgment in the case of C-\nCare in which my learned friend appeared. C-Care against the Employment Relations \nTribunal – \n“This is an appeal as of right from a decision of the Supreme Court of Mauritius, which \nrefused the appellant leave to apply for judicial review …” \nSo, what is he talking about? It is already in the law and in any event, the judicial \ncommittee of the Privy Council always have the discretion to entertain an application to be \n\n134 \n \nheard before him even if the Supreme Court has denied the applicant the right to appeal to the \nPrivy Council. \nMadam Speaker, the other thing he mentioned is that we need to bring a law so that all \nadministrative bodies are bound to give reasons of their decisions. Again, as a lawyer, he \nought to know if a person is aggrieved because he had a legitimate expectation to be informed \nof a decision, he had a legitimate expectation to be consulted or if a public body has abused \nhis right or has acted abusively abus de droit, these are grounds for judicial review. You \ndon’t have to set it out in the law; already it is a ground to apply for judicial review. So, there \nis absolutely no reason to go and amend all possible legislations and say that an \nadministrative body has to give a decision every time he is required to make a decision. We \nall know it is already in the Civil Code. Whenever a body/an authority is given a discretion, \nthey need to exercise this discretion in good faith. It is already in the law. There is no need to \nchange the law. \nSo, Madam Speaker, I hope I have replied to the various grounds raised by the hon. \nMember. I once again congratulate the hon. Attorney General and his team at the State Law \nOffice to bring this piece of legislation which no doubt, is going to simplify the application \nfor judicial review and ensure a speedier resolution of dispute. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \n Madam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. \n Your winding up speech, hon. Attorney General. \n(6.59 p.m.) \nMr Glover: Madam Speaker, I was just wondering when my learned colleagues were \nactually making reference to the other side of the House, that I am becoming very adept and \nalmost a champion now at shadow boxing because I do not have an opponent to face me \nwhen he needs to face me.  \nI am very grateful to the hon. Uteem for his extremely comprehensive tutorial on the \nlaw. I have not had the time to do it in my speech and he has done it as he usually does. I am \nalso very grateful to hon. Seeburn, hon. Ms. Collet and hon. Pentiah for their speeches on this \nBill.  \n\n135 \n \nNow, since hon. Uteem has been complete in his address to the House, let me just \naddress a couple of matters that really defeat completely my comprehension and \nunderstanding of the law.  \nIt is absolutely true and certain that my aim, the aim of this new Bill was not to change \nthe substance of the law relating to judicial review. Mr A. Duval, the hon. Member, is right to \nsay that I have not done so and I restricted my intervention to the procedural aspects for one \nvery good reason which was touched upon by hon. Ms Collet in her speech.  \nThe aim was to amend the processes so that we address the very immediate problem \nwhich is delay and accessibility. C’est un choix délibéré. C’est une simplification et non une \nrefonte.   \nNow, the point that hon. A. Duval makes in relation to the notification issue which \nbrought a wry smile to your face, Madam Speaker, is again because he has failed to read \neverything in the Bill. If he had gone to Clause 4 (Consequential amendments), and the \nvarious acts of Parliament which are being amended to put them in line with what we propose \nin this amendment to the Courts Act, he would have seen that in every single sub-part of \nClause 4, (1) (2) (3) (4) and following, that the words used in the enabling legislation which \ngave the right to the public body to take the decision – let’s take the first one which is the \nAllied Health Professionals Council Act where is said that it is amended by repealing section \n37 replacing by the following section – \n“Review of decision of Council – \nA person who is aggrieved by a decision of the Council.” \nNow, how can you be aggrieved if you do not know of the decision? If one goes to the \nnext one which is the Bank of Mauritius Act, how can you say that you are dissatisfied with \nthe determination of the review panel if you are not aware of the decision of the review \npanel? \nI can go on and on for another 30 minutes but I am obviously not going to bore this \nHouse with more nonsensical matters. \nNow, hon. Uteem has also delved on the 45 days issue, and I said it in my speech and I \nrepeat it so that it is very clear. There have been many decisions deciding on what is an \napplication which has been done with the promptness required by the law. Some legislations \nprovide for 21 days, some 28 days but some do not provide it and in the C-Care case, referred \n\n136 \n \nto earlier on, 42 days was decided not be prompt enough. And when we know that erstwhile, \nin the old days, three months was kind of the yardstick, it was decided and I said it in my \nspeech that 45 days would be as one can say we middle the diddle. We go for 45 days which \nis half of three months so that we give ample time to the persons dissatisfied with a decision \nto start judicial review proceedings.  \nNow, Madam Speaker, building a bridge to the future, which is the aim of this \nGovernment, means to pause and reassess the workings of our institutions with clarity and \nhonesty. We must ask ourselves whether they still serve the public with the efficiency, \nfairness and transparency that a mature democracy requires. \nThe reform before us, though technical in appearance, touches on principles that define \nwho we are as a nation. This Bill does not touch the substance of judicial oversight developed \nby our case law over decades. Instead, it simply modernises the procedure through which that \noversight is exercised. These reforms do not encroach upon judicial independence; they \nreinforce it by giving the courts the procedural structure they themselves have long called for. \nThey reduce unnecessary formalism and allow judges and allow judges to devote their time to \nwhat truly matters – the substance of the challenge. \nFinally, Madam Speaker, this Bill, in fact, restores trust in the system. It protects both \nthe individual and the administration by ensuring that legality is determined without \nunnecessary delay. It reaffirms that in Mauritius, the rule of law is not an abstract idea, but a \nliving principle.  \nWith these words, I commend the Bill to the House. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nBill read a second time and committed. \n \n \n \n \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(Madam Speaker in the Chair) \nThe Courts (Amendment) Bill (No. XXVIII of 2025) was considered and agreed to. \n\n137 \n \nOn the Assembly resuming with Madam Speaker in the Chair, Madam Speaker reported \naccordingly. \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Courts (Amendment) Bill (No. XXVIII of 2025) was \nread the third time and passed. \nADJOURNMENT \nMadam Speaker: Adjournment! \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Tuesday 02 December 2025 at 11.30 a.m. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned! \nAt 7.08 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 02 December 2025 \nat 11.30 a.m. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n138 \n \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \n \nSADC PROTOCOL ON EMPLOYMENT & LABOUR –MAURITIUS’ POSITION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1090",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1090,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/1090) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to meat for the forthcoming festive season, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to the – \n(a) \nexpected availability and volume of livestock for local consumption; \n(b) \nmeasures being taken to ensure stable and affordable prices, and \n(c) \nwhether any risk of price escalation or supply shortage have been identified.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nDWELLINGS – LANDSLIDES & EROSION – ENVISAGED MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1091",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1091,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/1091) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the dwellings severely \nendangered by landslides and erosion over the period 2019 to 2024 during the flood-prone \nseasons, he will state the number of occupiers thereof who were served an “order to \nevacuate”, indicating the number of such dwellings which are still occupied as at date and the \nmeasures being envisaged to ensure the safety of the occupiers thereof ahead of the 2025-\n2026 flood season.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nCONGOMAH BRIDGE – RECONSTRUCTION – START & COMPLETION DATES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1092",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1092,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1092) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Congomah \nBridge, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether the \n\n156 \n \nreconstruction thereof is being envisaged and, if so, indicate the timeframe for the expected \nstart and completion dates thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE MACHINES – DISTRIBUTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1093",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1093,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1093) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the 500 Continuous Positive \nAirway Pressure machines donated through the “Gift of Givers NGO”, from South Africa, in \nAugust 2022, he will state how same were distributed among the public health institutions.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRIVIÈRE DES CRÉOLES-NOUVELLE FRANCE – FLOODING MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1094",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1094,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/1094) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the coastal region of \nRivière des Créoles to Nouvelle France, classified red zones in terms of flooding, he will \nstate the emergency measures, if any, taken by his Ministry ahead of the forthcoming rainy \nseason.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMEDICAL REGISTRATION EXAMINATIONS – STATISTICS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1095",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1095,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1095) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Medical \nRegistration Examinations, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Medical \nCouncil, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of – \n(i) \ncandidates sitting therefor over the past five years, on a yearly basis, \nindicating the corresponding number of passes and pass rate, and  \n(ii) \nattempts open to a candidate to sit therefor, and  \n(b) \nwhether the examination papers are vetted by local medical consultants in \ncollaboration with the Mauritius Examinations Syndicate.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \n\n157 \n \nVISION 2050, 10-YEAR NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & NATIONAL \nPLANNING FRAMEWORK – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1096",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1096,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/1096) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard \nto the formulation of the Vision 2050 and corresponding 10-Year National Development Plan \nand the National Planning Framework, she will state where matters stand, indicating the \nmeasures being envisaged to rebuild trust in public institutions and ensuring transparency and \nintegrity.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBRAMSTHAN & ECROIGNARD REGIONS – ADEQUATE WATER SUPPLY \nPROVISION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1097",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1097,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/1097) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the villages of \nBramsthan and Ecroignard and the adjoining areas, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to where matters stand concerning \nthe provision of adequate water supply thereat.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Central Water Authority (CWA) that water supply to the \nvillages of Bramsthan, Ecroignard and adjoining areas, situated in Constituency No.10, are \nmanaged by the Water Supply Zone East.  \nThe main sources of water supply for these regions and their vicinity are – \na. \nFor Bramsthan region – Bonne Mère Service Reservoir and Bramsthan \nContainerised Pressure Filters (CPF), and \nb. \nFor Ecroignard region – Fayence Service Reservoir. \nAccording to the CWA, the normal hours of supply are from 3.00 a.m. to 9.00 a.m. and \n3.00 p.m. to 9.00 p.m., thus totalling to 12 hours of water supply daily. However, the supply \nmay vary depending on water production at the above-mentioned sources. \nOver the last few years, because of the prolonged dry seasons coupled with an \nincreasing demand, the CWA has had to abstract and treat water from rivers in order to \ncompensate for the decreased water production. \nThe CWA, therefore, depends heavily on CPF even during normal seasons to provide \nan adequate water supply in the concerned regions.  \n\n158 \n \nUnfortunately, during heavy rainfall periods, the river water becomes so muddy that the \nCPFs switch off automatically as a protective mechanism.  \nThis causes a deficit in water production in CWA networks resulting in water supply \nissues, the more so as there are presently 14 Containerized Pressure Filters supplying the \neastern region. In such circumstances, the CWA deploys water tankers to serve the affected \nregions. \nI am further informed by the CWA that to alleviate the current shortage of water supply \nin the eastern region, it is envisaging to drill new boreholes in the region. As long-term \nmeasures, there is a proposal to upgrade the Piton du Milieu Treatment Plant to facilitate \nexport of water from Unité Reservoir to Bonne Mère Reservoir and replace major pipes in the \nregion to reduce water losses. \nFor the time being, valve operations are being carried out to rationalise water supply \nand water tankers are deployed as and when required. \nANJALAY COOPEN STADIUM – DEPLORABLE STATE – OPERATIONALITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1098",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1098,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/1098) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port-Louis Maritime & Port \nLouis East) asked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Anjalay \nCoopen Stadium, in Belle Vue Harel, he will state if it is operational and, if not, why not, \nindicating the monthly cost incurred pending its becoming operational anew.",
      "answer": "Reply: I have on several occasions, informed the House on the deplorable state of our \nsports infrastructures. The Anjalay Coopen Stadium is one prime example. It is worth noting \nthat the last major renovation works at the stadium dates back to 2019 in the context of the \nIndian Ocean Islands Games. After the Games, the stadium was heavily neglected, if not \nabandoned.  \nI am informed by the MSC that the stadium is not operational since February 2024 due \nto, inter alia, the following reasons – \n(a) \nHeavy water leakage on the Grand stand; \n(b) \nAbsence of Fire Certificate due to faulty fire alarm system coupled with defective \nfire hose reels and fire-fighting equipment; \n(c) \nDamaged bucket seats and changing rooms being out of order; \n(d) \nBroken tiles; \n(e) \nDamaged false ceilings;  \n(f) \nFlaking and cracking paints, and \n\n159 \n \n(g) \nPigeon infestation. \nFollowing a site visit I effected on 28 November 2024, I expressed my concern on the \nstate of the stadium and gave directives to identify savings and expedite renovation for the \noperationalisation thereof. \nFollowing surveys conducted by my Ministry, it was decided to proceed with the \nupgrading in phase wise manner. Hence in May 2025, Phase I of the renovation works \nstarted. A contract for an amount of Rs13 million was awarded for the following upgrading \nworks on the Grand stand – \n(a) \nRemoval and fixing of new tiles to damaged existing tiles at corridor and \nchanging rooms; \n(b) \nRepair to spalled concrete; \n(c) \nInternal and external painting works to front stadium block. \n(d) \nApplication of floor dressing paint where required; \n(e) \nReplace damaged false ceiling, and \n(f) \nRemoval of wooden ducting. \nThe works started on 08 May 2025 and are expected to be completed by early next \nyear.  \nA sum of Rs20.4 million was allotted in the current budget and same is being used for \nthe upgrading works, including the implementation of anti-bird systems. This system \ncomprises the installation of bird netting, bird deterrent devices and repellents. Bids were \nlaunched on 18 November 2025 and works are expected to start by February 2026.  \nThe scope of work for the installation of a new fire alarm system has been finalised. \nSimilarly, the scope for water proofing and provision of new bucket seats on the main stand \nhas been defined. Tender documents for both projects are in preparation.  \nAlthough, the Anjalay Coopen Stadium is not operational, routine tasks like cleaning \nand watchmanship are catered in-house by my Ministry. The monthly average cost, including \nsalaries, overtime, watchmanship and utilities bills amount to some Rs900,000.  \nCAESAREAN SECTION BIRTHS – AGE RANGE & RATIO – REMEDIAL \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1099",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1099,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1099) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to women giving birth \nthrough Caesarean Section (CS), he will state the prevalence thereof in Mauritius, indicating \nthe – \n\n160 \n \n(a) \nage range concerned therewith and the ratio of birth by CS in both public and \nprivate health institutions, and  \n(b) \nmeasures his Ministry proposes to take to address the issue along the \nrecommendations of the World Health Organisation.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nANGIOGRAM EXAMINATIONS/ANGIOGRAPHY PROCEDURE – WAITING LIST \n– REMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1100",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1100,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1100) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to angiogram \nexaminations/angiography procedure, he will state the – \n(a) \nnumber of – \n(i) \npatients having undergone same at the Jawaharlal Nehru and Queen \nVictoria (Candos) hospitals, respectively since 2020 to 2025, indicating \nthe number thereof on the waiting list as at October 2025, and  \n(ii) \nangiography machines available therefor, and  \n(b) \nmeasures put in place to reduce waiting time therefor and facilitate same.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBUDGET 2025/26 – LOWERED VAT – REGISTRATION THRESHOLD",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1101",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1101,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives",
      "question": "(No. B/1101) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives whether, in regard to the \nintroduction of the lowered Value Added Tax (VAT) registration threshold for businesses \nwith a turnover exceeding Rs 3 million, as announced in the Budget Speech 2025/26 and \neffective as from 1 October 2025, he will state the expected number of businesses falling \nwithin the turnover bracket of Rs 3 million to Rs 6 million during the current financial year \nand the number thereof having registered thereunder as at to date.",
      "answer": "Reply: In my reply to the Private Notice Question of 04 July 2025 on Value Added \nTax, I informed the House that, according to figures submitted by the Ministry of Finance \nand the Mauritius Revenue Authority (MRA), some 6,900 business operators were expected \nto be registered for VAT purposes with the lowering of the Value Added Tax registration \nthreshold from Rs6 million to Rs3 million. \nI am now informed by the MRA that, as at 20 November 2025, a total number of 6,295 \nVAT registration applications has been received by the MRA. Of these, 4,378 applications \n\n161 \n \nwere submitted electronically, while 1,672 were submitted manually, indicating strong uptake \nof the electronic registration platform among small business operators. The MRA has already \nprocessed 6,050 applications, with 245 applications currently under review. \n \nSMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES – LOANS GRANTED – ASSISTANCE \nPROVIDED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1102",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1102,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives",
      "question": "(No. B/1102) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives whether, in regard to the \nSmall and Medium Enterprises, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \n– \n(a)  the number thereof registered as at date, indicating the amount of loans granted \nthereto from 2020 to 2024;  \n(b)  whether any assessment has been made of the obstacles with which they are \nfaced, and  \n(c)  the efforts being made to support them overcome trade barriers and expand \ninternationally.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBEAU PLATEAU ROAD (GOODLANDS-COTTAGE) – ROAD WIDENING – \nPAVEMENTS & HANDRAILS INSTALLATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1103",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1103,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1103) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the connecting road from Beau \nPlateau Road, from Goodlands to Cottage, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to whether consideration is being given for the – \n(a)  widening thereof, in view of the number of accidents reported thereat and \nincreasing volume of vehicles plying thereat daily and, if so, indicate the expected \nstart and completion dates thereof, and  \n(b)  installation of pavements and handrails thereat, including through compulsory \nland acquisition near residential zones if deemed necessary to ensure the safety of \npedestrians. \n\n162",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nAGRICULTURAL LAND CONVERSION – COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL – \nPROTECTIVE MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1104",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1104,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/1104) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to agricultural land, he will state the extent thereof converted for commercial and \nresidential purposes over the period 2019 to 2024, indicating the measures being envisaged \nfor the protection and preservation thereof for the purpose of farming and food production in \nthe face of the urgency to ensure food security.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nNATIONAL TRANSPORT CORPORATION – STAFF UNIFORM PROCUREMENT \n– STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1105",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1105,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/1105) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the procurement of \nuniforms for the staff members of the National Transport Corporation, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Reply: According to the Public Transport (Buses) Workers (Remuneration) \nRegulations 2019, every employer has a statutory obligation to provide uniforms to all \neligible workers, comprising primarily bus crews (drivers and conductors), traffic officers, \nworkshop employees and administrative staff governed by the National Remuneration Board \n(NRB) regime. \nPursuant to these Regulations, the 2017 employees of the NTC are eligible for \nuniforms, as follows – \n \nCrews (Drivers & Conductors): 1,573 \n \nWorkshop Employees: 280 \n \nTraffic Officers: 119 \n \nNRB Admin Employees: 45 \nEach worker is entitled to three sets of uniforms annually. \nAccording to information obtained from NTC, the supply of uniforms to its employees \nfor the year 2025 has been delayed due to a series of circumstances, namely – \n\n163 \n \n(i) \nuniforms relating to the year 2024 have been allocated to eligible employees only \nin February 2025; \n(ii) \npursuant to a request from the employees, the design of the uniform was reviewed \nand approved by the NTC Board in August 2025, and \n(iii) the cancellation of the ongoing bidding exercise in September 2025 to abide by \nthe mandatory requirement of the e-Procurement System instead of the traditional \npaper-based method. \nThe NTC has informed that the bidding exercise will be relaunched shortly by the \nNTC and that the uniforms for the year 2025 should be available for distribution to eligible \nemployees by mid- March 2026. \nThe NTC has further informed that the NTC Employees Union and Transport Industry \nWorkers Union is requesting for a one-off cash allowance of Rs7000 per eligible employee in \nlieu of the three sets of uniform. \nThe NTC is examining the proposal. \n \nEXPORTS TO UNITED STATES – AFRICA GROWTH & OPPORTUNITY ACT – \nRENEWAL",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1106",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1106,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives",
      "question": "(No. B/1106) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives whether, in regard to our exports to the United \nStates, he will state where matters stand following the recent renewal of the Africa Growth \nand Opportunity Act for one year.",
      "answer": "Reply: Since its inception in 2000, the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) \nhas been a vital market-access tool enabling Mauritian exporters to strengthen and expand \ntheir presence in the United States. This preferential market access has given Mauritian \nindustry operators a competitive advantage over low-cost producing countries. As such, the \nUnited States remained a principal export destination for Mauritius, ranking third largest \nmarket for domestically manufactured goods in 2024. \nIt is a known fact that AGOA has officially expired on 30 September 2025 and has, at \ndate, neither been renewed nor extended, placing this longstanding duty-free market access at \nrisk. \nWithout a renewed agreement, Mauritian exporters will lose valuable trade preferences \nthat they benefit from the AGOA, which has, so far, been the linchpin for sustaining their \nmarket share and export growth on the US market for the last 25 years. \n\n164 \n \nAGOA conferred tariff benefits to Mauritian enterprises, particularly in the textile and \napparel sector. In the absence of such a vital trade framework, Mauritian exports would be \nsubjected to the Most-Favoured-Nation tariff rates where applicable, in addition to the new \nUS reciprocal tariffs revised at 15% in August 2025. \nMauritian products are henceforth subject to a new tariff regime when exporting to the \nUnited States, significantly undermining the price competitiveness of our exports in a highly \ncost-sensitive market. These tariff levels are placing Mauritius at a distinct disadvantage as \ncompared to major competitors, such as Bangladesh, Vietnam, India and Cambodia, which \nhave inherent lower production costs and benefit from economies of scale, allowing them to \nbetter absorb tariff increases. \nIt is crucial to reiterate that AGOA expired on 30 September 2025. Nonetheless, let me \nreassure hon. Members of this House that Mauritius has been consistently and relentlessly \nadvocating for a short-term renewal of AGOA preferences until a long-term trade and \ninvestment solution is worked out between the United States and Sub-Saharan African \ncountries. \nMauritius has spared no efforts to lobby for AGOA renewal at various levels, be it at \nthe level of the African Diplomatic Corps in Washington and at bilateral level through \ndiplomatic efforts. In September 2025, the African Diplomatic Corps forwarded letters to the \nUS Congress reiterating the need for urgent action. The Government of Mauritius has \ncapitalised on every opportunity it had during international forums to highlight the \npredicament of Sub-Saharan African countries. \nThe future of AGOA remains under active discussion in the US Congress. However, \nfollowing the recent Government shutdown in the US, matters remained at a standstill and \nthus AGOA renewal issues could not be pursued. \nI wish to place on record the seriousness of Government on this matter. I led the \nMauritian delegation during the 17th United States–Africa Business Summit held in June \n2025 in Angola, organised by the Corporate Council on Africa. During the Summit, I met \nwith Ms C. Hamilton, Assistant United States Trade Representative and Mr T. Fitrell, \nAdvisor to the US President, to advocate for a short-term 2-year renewal of AGOA, in its \npresent form, as well as to reiterate the proposal for a Mauritius-US bilateral trade agreement \nor a regional umbrella agreement for African countries.   \nLet me reiterate that Mauritius will be hosting the 18th US–Africa Business Summit in \nAugust 2026. As a premier trade-focused event, the Summit will highlight opportunities for \npartnerships, investment and stronger trade ties between the United States and Africa. This \n\n165 \n \nevent will provide the strategic platform to advocate firmly for both the renewal of AGOA \nand pursue discussions for a potential bilateral trade agreement between Mauritius and the \nUnited States. \nMembers of this House would appreciate that I, together with my colleague, hon. \nRamful, co-signed a letter addressed to His Excellency Ambassador Jamieson Greer, United \nStates Trade Representative, on 14 November 2025, reiterating the readiness of Mauritius to \nenter into a bilateral agreement with the United States. In this regard, we have also requested \nfor a meeting with the Ambassador as soon as possible to discuss the agreement. The meeting \nis likely to be held early next year. Furthermore, our Embassy in Washington will be \nparticipating in meetings from 09 to 12 December 2025, with representatives of AGOA-\neligible countries and members of the US Congress in our continuing efforts to lobbying for \nthe renewal of AGOA. \n \nRODRIGUES – NATIONAL HEALTH-SECTOR MODERNISATION PLAN – \nMODERN HOSPITAL CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1107",
      "sitting_id": "25-november-2025",
      "date": "2025-11-25",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1107,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1107) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the \nMinister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the national health-sector \nmodernisation plan and, in the light of the completion of the Sir Anerood Jugnauth Hospital, \nthe National Cancer Centre and the ongoing development of the new hospital to replace the \nSSRN Hospital in mainland Mauritius, he will state whether his Ministry is considering the \nconstruction of a new modern hospital in Rodrigues and, if so, indicate the preparatory \nmeasures, if any, envisaged as at to date, giving details of the support and nature thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: While my Ministry has at heart the wellbeing of the population of the Republic \nof Mauritius, I wish to inform the House that as at present there is need to have more focused \nconsultations with the Rodrigues Administration for a modern hospital in Rodrigues to meet \nthe needs of its population. \nMy Ministry continues, however, to collaborate closely with the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly through the Prime Minister's Office to support the strengthening of existing health \nservices on the island, in line with identified needs and available resources. \nI intend to conduct a site visit to Rodrigues with high officials of my Ministry to take \ncognisance of the health services thereat. \n \n \n\n166",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-25-november-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1108",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1108,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1108) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Côte \nd’Or International Racecourse and Entertainment Complex Ltd., he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to the – \n(a) \ncomposition of the Board thereof, indicating the salaries and benefits drawn by \nthe Chairperson and other members;  \n(b) \nrole and responsibilities thereof in managing and upgrading the Champ de Mars \nracetrack;  \n(c) \nfees imposed on the MTC Jockey Club for each race meeting for the 2025 Racing \nSeason, and  \n(d) \nother fees, if any, levied on operators at the Champ de Mars for each Race \nMeeting.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the previous MSM government did everything \n– and I mean everything – to undermine the horseracing industry and to weaken the MTC. \nAll that was done on purpose to favour private, shady interests. It was in that context that \nCOIREC was set up to fulfil their ambitions. \nDuring the election campaign, we had vowed to restore public trust in Mauritius’ \nhistoric horseracing industry, which has been part of the island’s culture for the last 200 \nyears. \nAs enunciated in our Government Programme 2025-2029, this Government has \nsuccessfully restored public confidence in the horseracing industry, as witnessed from the \nfirst racing day held on 26 July 2025 at the Champ de Mars and also, at the recent one, the \nMaiden Cup. Under the previous government, the horseracing industry was being driven \ntowards its demise. That was the purpose of what they tried to do. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by COIREC that the Board \ncurrently comprises the following ex-officio members – \n\n20 \n \nActing \nChairperson \nMr A. Acharuz \nFinancial Secretary \nDirectors \nMr R. Baungally \nAssistant Solicitor General, Attorney \nGeneral's Office \nMr D. Mohabeer \nDeputy \nChief \nExecutive \nOfficer, \nEconomic Development Board \nMr A. K. Seetaram \nDirector, \nTourism, \nMinistry \nof \nTourism \nMs H. Y. Sharon Yong-\nTit-Kow \nAssistant Permanent Secretary, Prime \nMinister's Office \nThe monthly fees payable to the Chairperson and Directors are Rs42,000 and Rs15,750, \nrespectively. \nRegarding part (b) of the question, I am informed that following amendments to section \n29 of the State Lands Act in the Finance (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2022, COIREC was, \nas from May 2022, entrusted with the control and maintenance of the State Land at Champ de \nMars. Accordingly, on 01 July 2025, a lease agreement was signed between the MTC Jockey \nClub Ltd. and COIREC for a period of 10 years, that is, up to 2034. Of course, the MTC then \nhad to oblige because this was the plan. \nUnder this lease agreement, the responsibility for the management, maintenance and \nupgrading of the racetracks falls under the responsibility of the MTC Jockey Club Ltd. \nthroughout the lease period, which as I said, I think, ends in 2035. \nAs regard parts (c) & (d) of the question, I am informed that a rental fee of Rs250,000 \nper race meeting, excluding VAT, is payable by MTC Jockey Club Ltd. to COIREC. \nProvisions have been made in the lease agreement for a yearly increase of 5% in the fee \npayable. MTC Jockey Club Ltd. has the right to commercially exploit the Champ de Mars, \n\n21 \n \nincluding the collection of rentals and any other income derived thereof, subject to the \nconsent of the lessor. \nMadam Speaker, in July 2025, amendments were brought, inter alia, to sections 31 and \n32 of the Gambling Regulatory (Amendment) Act 2025 and provision was made for any \nstatutory body or government owned company to take control and maintenance of the Champ \nde Mars. Accordingly, COIREC is being wound up. All its activities, assets, liabilities and \nobligations are being transferred to a specific entity operating under Landscope Mauritius, \nwith clearly defined governance structure. \nDuring this transitional period, the Board is overseeing ongoing operations, ensuring \ncompliance with all statutory obligations, and approving all matters necessary to facilitate an \norderly winding-down and closure of the company. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle! \nCIVIL STATUS OFFICE, OLD GRAND PORT – REOPENING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1109",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1109,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1109) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Civil \nStatus Office at Old Grand Port, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nthe reasons for its closure, indicating since when it is closed and whether consideration will \nbe given for the reopening thereof to facilitate access to vital registration services for \nresidents of Grand Sable, Old Grand Port, Bambous Virieux and surrounding areas.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the Old Grand Port Civil \nStatus Office was opened in December 1984 and was operational twice weekly on Tuesdays \nand Thursdays, because of the low frequency of members of the public requiring civil status \nservices. \nThe Old Grand Port Civil Status Office was closed in July 2013. Since then, the \nresidents of Grand Sable, Old Grand Port, Bambous Virieux and surrounding areas were \navailing of the civil status services at the Mahebourg, Rose Belle, Plaine Magnien and Bel \nAir Rivière Sèche. The Mahebourg Civil Status Office is the closest alternate office, easily \naccessible to the inhabitants of Grand Port and is fully operational for five days a week. \n\n22 \n \nHowever, Madam Speaker, I am further informed that the renovation works for the Old \nGrand Port Civil Status Office is being done and will be completed by next month. The \nrecruitment exercise to fill vacancies for 13 Civil Status Officers is ongoing. Thereafter, the \nOld Grand Port Civil Status Office will be reopened, hopefully, by March 2026. \nMadam Speaker: Mr Ramdass, you are alright?  \nThe hon. Second Member for Rodrigues, Mr François! \nFCC SUB-OFFICE, RODRIGUES – STAFF, OFFICE ACCOMMODATION & \nCOMPLETED CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1110",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1110,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1110) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the sub-office of the \nFinancial Crimes Commission at Camp Du Roi in Rodrigues Island, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe number of staff members posted thereat;  \n(b) \nwhether it is adequately equipped to operate at full capacity and to expedite the \nhandling of complaints while ensuring an active and responsive presence on the \nground in Rodrigues, and  \n(c) \nnumber of completed cases as at date from Rodrigues.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, let me first inform the House that the sub-office \nof the Financial Crimes Commission in Rodrigues has now moved from Camp du Roi to Rue \nLa Solidarité in Port Mathurin. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the Financial Crimes Commission that the sub-\noffice is manned by two investigators and one Woman Police Officer. In addition, the \noperations of the sub-office are under the supervision of one Chief Investigator from the \nFinancial Crimes Commission based in Mauritius. \nIn relation to part (b) of the question, I am informed that the Sub-office is equipped \nwith all the necessary facilities for its operations and arrangements are also made for officers \n\n23 \n \nof the Financial Crimes Commission based in Mauritius to proceed to Rodrigues for \ninterrogation of suspects in high profile cases as and when required. \nAs regards part (c) of the question, 52 cases have been registered at the Sub-office in \nRodrigues during period March 2024 to-date. Out of these, 32 cases have been completed and \n20 are still under investigation. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister! \nYes, the hon. Second Member for Grand’Baie and Poudre d'Or, Mr Beejan! \nMR R. Y., BARRISTER AT LAW – FEES & ALLOWANCES – 2017-2025",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1111",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1111,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1111) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre D'or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mr. R. Y., \nBarrister at Law, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the detailed \nquantum of fees and allowances paid out thereto, together with the other fringe benefits to \nwhich he was entitled over the period 2017 to 2025 in his capacity as legal representative, \nchairperson, board member and any other legal services rendered to each of the different \nMinistries, parastatal bodies and State-Owned Companies.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, as per information gathered, Mr Ravi \nYerrigadoo, Barrister-at-Law, provided legal services for the following public institutions and \nhas received fees as stated below – \n(i) \nRs10.9 million from the SBM Group for period 2017 to 2024; \n(ii) \nRs10.7 million from the SIC Group for period 2017 to 2024; \n(iii) Rs4 million from the GRA for the period 2019 to 2024; \n(iv) Rs2.4 million from the Maubank Group for period 2017 to 2025; \n(v) \nRs1.1 million from the Bank of Mauritius in June 2022; \n(vi) Rs920,000 from ICTA for the period 2022 to 2024; \n(vii) Rs637,850 from Airports of Mauritius Co Ltd in 2022 and 2024; \n \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister, please! \n\n24 \n \nThe Prime Minister: \n(viii) Rs603,750 from the Mauritius Police Force, during the tenure of the former \nCommissioner of Police, for the period 2023 to 2024; \n(ix) Rs393,300 from Mauritius Duty Free Paradise Co Ltd in 2023 and 2024;  \n(x) \nRs320,000 from the ex-Investment Support Programme Ltd; \n(xi) Rs204,960 from the Mauritius Shipping Corporation Ltd for the period of 2018 to \n2019, and \n(xii) Rs39,200 from the Mauritius Society of Authors during period the 2019 to 2020. \nMadam Speaker, Mr Yerrigadoo, another blue-eyed boy of the previous regime who \nenjoyed… Hon. Duval asked me a question about advisors. Look, how much money was \ngiven at that time! He enjoyed extreme largesse as he was providing legal services to not less \nthan 12 government entities from 2017 to 2025.  He has, during that period, received fees, \nMadam Speaker, totalling Rs32.2 million from various institutions.  \nMs Anquetil: Oh là là ! C’est scandaleux ! \nAn hon. Member: Shame! \nThe Prime Minister: That is a scandal. I wish you had asked the question then. \nIn view of some disturbing facts that have emerged from the circumstances under \nwhich the services of Mr Yerrigadoo have been enlisted as legal adviser and the quantum of \nfees paid, an enquiry will be initiated. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nYes, the hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière, Mr Quirin! \nSMALL BUSINESSES – VAT REGISTRATION THRESHOLD –– AMNESTY ON \nFINES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1112",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1112,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1112) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the recent \nlowering of the Value Added Tax registration threshold for businesses with a turnover \nexceeding Rs 3 million, as announced in the Budget Speech 2025/26 and effective as from 01 \n\n25 \n \nOctober 2025, he will state if he will consider granting an amnesty on fines applicable to \nsmall businesses and entrepreneurs to encourage them to properly prepare and file their first \nVAT return, whilst ensuring fairness and promoting compliance.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, in accordance with the Value Added Tax Act, \nsmall businesses and entrepreneurs whose turnover are between Rs3 million and Rs6 million \nare required to file their first VAT return on or before 31 January 2026 in respect to the period \n01 October 2025 to 31 December 2025.   \nA small business or entrepreneur submitting the VAT return after the 31 January 2026 \nwill be liable to pay a penalty for non-submission of VAT return and no-payment of VAT.  \nMadam Speaker, there is no amnesty provided on tax due by tax payers. However, \nsmall businesses and entrepreneurs will be given one month extension of time, that is, up-to \nthe 28 February 2026, to submit their return and pay their VAT, without being liable to \npenalty or fines. \nFollowing the announcement in June 2025 in the Budget Speech 2025-2026 to reduce \nthe VAT registration threshold from Rs6 million to Rs3 million, MRA has taken a series of \nmeasures to assist small businesses and entrepreneurs to properly prepare and file their VAT \nreturn, namely – \na) \na Communiqué was issued on 12 September 2025 requesting persons required to \nbe registered and who need assistance to phone on the MRA hotline, or to use the \nMRA e-appointment facility; \nb) \ndedicated customer service desks for the SMEs requiring assistance have been put \nin place at the MRA Head Office; \nc) \nsimplified VAT Registration System has been put in place; \nd) \na Guide on Simplified VAT Registration is published on the MRA website; \ne) \na guide on simplified record keeping has also been prepared by the MRA, and \nf) \nthe MRA has invited the newly VAT registered persons to attend dedicated \neducation sessions. \n\n26 \n \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the Mauritius Revenue Authority that as at 27 \nNovember 2025, a total of 6,518 VAT registration applications has already been received by \nthe MRA compared to the estimated number of 6,900 new tax payers for the financial year. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nYes, Mr Quirin! \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente ! Le Premier ministre peut-il informer la \nChambre si le gouvernement pourrait envisager d’accorder une exonération tout du moins, un \nmoratoire de six mois au lieu d’un mois comme il l’a mentionné afin de permettre à ces \nentreprises de s’acquitter de leur premier versement de la TVA dans des conditions \nsoutenables ? \nThe Prime Minister: It is going to be very difficult to do that, Madam Speaker, for the \nreasons I gave earlier on. We have to be sure that we collect the taxes. We have given an \nextension, that’s what we are sticking to. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! \nMr A. Duval, you wanted one? \nMr A. Duval: Yes. May I ask the hon. Prime Minister whether he will consider \nexempting those persons who offer services in coaching, sports, training, academies, etc.? My \nunderstanding is that they are subject to payment of VAT whilst they are promoting a \nhealthier living. So, could he review at least that aspect to look at promoting healthier \nlifestyles, exempting those companies and entrepreneurs from payment of VAT? \nMr Ameer Meea: All services are taxed. \nMr A. Duval: Yes, that’s why I am asking! \nThe Prime Minister: All services! Because, you know, the minute we make \nexceptions, you will see other people will ask for exceptions. We have to ensure and act \nresponsibly that we do not allow the public debt to increase and we get what we are supposed \nto get in the coffers of the Government so that we can address the issue that Moody’s is \nlooking at very carefully. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Next question, Mr Lobine! \n\n27 \n \nCARGO HANDLING CORPORATION – CONTAINERS DELIVERY – DELAYS \nCOMPLAINTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1113",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1113,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1113) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix)  asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Container \nTerminal at the Port Louis Harbour, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCargo Handling Corporation, information as to whether there have been complaints of delays \nin the delivery of containers to importers of goods, particularly entrepreneurs and, if so, the \nreasons therefor.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Mauritius Ports Authority \nand the Cargo Handling Corporation Ltd that representations have been made in writing on \n20 August and 10 September 2025 and also verbally on a few occasions by the Mauritius \nExport Association and the Mauritius Chamber of Commerce and Industry, on behalf of their \nmembers regarding delays in the delivery of containers, thus impacting on the business \ncommunity.    \nSuch delays occur mainly after adverse weather conditions, during which container \nhandling operations are suspended for safety and security reasons. The operations of the \nCargo Handling Corporation Ltd are further affected through the shortage of Rubber Tyred \nGantry Crane Operators and insufficient Ship-to-Shore Cranes. The Corporation has presently \nfive such cranes which are already operating at full capacity. \nI wish to inform the House that three out of the eight Ship-to-Shore Cranes having \nreached the end of their economic useful lives, were removed from operations since February \n2023 and were not replaced. These factors slow down vessel performance and affect \nproductivity negatively.  \nOwing to these delays, 10 container vessels carrying a total of 4,396 import containers, \nskipped their calls at Port Louis Harbour for the period June to August 2025, and this has \nrepercussions on the local market. These ships have been diverted to other regional ports and \nthe containers ultimately reached Port Louis with significant delays ranging from four to \neight weeks. \nTo address this issue, the Mauritius Ports Authority had a meeting on 22 August 2025, \nwith the Cargo Handling Corporation Ltd, the Mauritius Export Association, the Mauritius \n\n28 \n \nChamber of Commerce and Industry as well as the Shipping Lines to identify and implement \nremedial actions. Consequently, the situation has improved with all diverted containers \nreaching Port Louis albeit with some delays; but not such long delays. \nMadam Speaker, to further improve its services, Cargo Handling Corporation Ltd has \nstarted the training of 32 employees as Rubber Tyred Gantry Operators since last month. In \naddition, the Government of India is providing, free of cost, a Cargo Handling Equipment \nTraining Simulator for hands-on training. The Government of India would concurrently \ndepute a technical expert for a period of two years for the training of operators. Delivery of \nthe Simulator is expected by the end of this year.   \nMadam Speaker, in reply to Parliamentary Question B/471 at our Sitting of 13 May \n2025, the House was informed that to enhance efficiency and competitiveness, the Cargo \nHandling Corporation Ltd was proceeding with the implementation of its Business Plan at the \ncost of Rs5.3 billion with the acquisition of state-of-the-art equipment, implementation of \ngreen initiatives, capacity building and digitalisation of operations. This plan is being \nimplemented in two phases and the first phase, over a period of two years, comprises the \nacquisition of the following cargo handling equipment at the cost of Rs2.77 billion to be \nfinanced by the Corporation’s own funds – \n(a) \nacquisition of two Super Post Panamax Ship-to-Shore Cranes; \n(b) \nacquisition of five hybrid Rubber-Tyred Gantry Cranes, and \n(c) \nprocurement of 15 Tractors and Trailers and other associated yard equipment.  \nAction is also being taken by the Central Procurement Board for the floating of \ninternational tenders. \nAs regards the second phase, I wish to inform the House that, the Government of India \nhas extended a grant for the acquisition of port equipment by the Cargo Handling Corporation \nLtd to the tune of Rs3.3 billion which would include the procurement of one Super Post-\nPanamax crane, eight Rubber Tyred Gantry cranes and other associated yard equipment. In \nthis context, the Ministry of Finance is in the process of signing a Memorandum of \nUnderstanding with the Government of India. \nAs I have stated in the House, Madam Speaker, a total revamping of the port and other \ninfrastructure to support maritime economic activities is being envisaged. In this context, \n\n29 \n \nfollowing my State visit to India last September, the Indian Authorities have agreed, in \nprinciple, on the strategic side, for the redevelopment and restructuring of Port in Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, Dr. Aumeer.  \nROAD ACCIDENTS – IMPAIRED DRIVERS – VALID LICENSE HOLDERS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1114",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1114,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1114) Dr F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to road traffic accidents, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the number of reported cases thereof wherein \ndrivers involved therein were found to be driving under the influence of alcohol or illegal \ndrugs/substances and/or without holding valid driving licences over the past three years, \nindicating in each case the number of – \n(a)  fatalities that ensued, and  \n(b) \nvehicles involved that were rented as contract cars and those which were rented \nillegally.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the Question, I am \ninformed by the Commissioner of Police that from 01 January 2022 to 28 November 2025, \n806 cases of road traffic accidents due to driving under the influence of alcohol or illegal \ndrugs or without holding a valid driving licence, were reported to the Police.  Out of those \n806 cases, 287 were fatal road accidents. Out of which – \n(a) \n25 cases concern driving under the influence of alcohol; \n(b) \n8 cases involve driving under the influence of drugs or intoxicating substances, \nand \n(c) \n8 cases concern driving without a driving licence. \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that 110 vehicles rented as contract \ncars were involved in road accidents, among which, 4 were illegally rented cars. Out of the \n110 rented vehicles, two were involved in fatal road accidents while driving under the \ninfluence of alcohol, and one under the influence of drugs or other intoxicating substances.  \nThese figures, Madam Speaker, are a stark reminder that reckless and unlawful driving \nbehaviours, be it under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or without a licence, continue to \n\n30 \n \nclaim lives on our roads. Government remains fully committed to reversing that trend through \nstronger enforcement, enhanced legislation and smarter technology. \nIn this regard, amendments to the Road Traffic Act are being introduced, in fact, this \nevening in this Assembly. The amendments will reinforce deterrence and ensure that our \nlegal framework keeps pace with evolving road safety challenges \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Dr. Aumeer.  \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. With regard to the forthcoming \nlegislation for what we call ‘permis à points’, may I ask the hon. Prime Minister whether, \nconsideration will be given for those that have resulted in fatalities where there has been \ndrink-driving and illegal consumption of drugs, that the very harshest penalties be considered \nsuch as full suspension of their license for life?  \nThank you.  \nThe Prime Minister: I think this is already taken care of in the Road Traffic \n(Amendment) Bill.  \nMadam Speaker: It is taken care of.  \nDr. Aumeer: One more, please.  \nMadam Speaker: One more and then your next question.  \nDr. Aumeer: Sure. Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I also ask the hon. Prime \nMinister whether, he will use his good office so that the court system in this country \nintroduces a fast-track system whereby there have been fatalities, secondary once again, to \ndrugged driving or illegal consumption of drugs so that the chances of being released on bail, \nwhich cause so much discomfort to bereaved families, are minimised and these people are put \nbehind bars at the quickest opportunity that the court can find? \nMadam Speaker: But that depends on the court.  \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, but I can say that the hon. Attorney General, in fact, is \nlooking at all these measures. There are some oppositions to it, I must say, but we are going \nto go ahead with that. We need to have a fast-track justice wherever there are problems like \nthis. We cannot wait for 6 months, one year or two years.  \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Interesting! \n\n31 \n \nDr. Aumeer, your next question! \nWHITE COLLAR CRIMES – ARRESTS UNDER PROVISIONAL CHARGES – \nMEDICAL ASSISTANCE & BAIL",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1115",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1115,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1115) Dr F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to white collar crimes, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Financial \nCrimes Commission, information as to the number of suspects arrested under provisional \ncharges since November 2024 to date in relation thereto, indicating the – \n(a) \ncharges preferred in each case, and  \n(b) \nnumber thereof who – \n (i) \nneeded medical attention and proceeded to private clinics and public \nhospitals, respectively;  \n(ii) \nobtained bail whilst under medical care, and  \n(iii) spent time in police custody pending release on bail.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Financial Crimes \nCommission that 88 suspects have been arrested under provisional charges since November \n2024 to-date. \nIn relation to the information regarding charges levelled against each suspect, the \nFinancial Crimes Commission has advised that by virtue of section 161 of the Financial \nCrimes Commission Act, no information relating to any investigation can be divulged.  \nMadam Speaker, as regards to part (b)(i) of the question, I am informed by the \nFinancial Crimes Commission that 8 suspects needed medical attention and proceeded to \nprivate clinics and/or public hospital.  I am tabling the details of the 8 suspects who needed \nmedical attention. \nOut of the 8 suspects, one obtained bail whilst under medical care. \nAs regards part (b) (iii) of the question, 3 suspects spent time both in police custody and \nin private clinics pending their release on bail. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes. \n\n32 \n \nTwo questions! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I am sure what I am going to say the whole \nHouse is aware of. Keeping in mind that the hon. Prime Minister himself, while he was under \nvile prosecution and persecution, he did not, at any time, attempt to replace prison with \nluxury confinement but faced the music and went to Moka Detention Centre.  \nMadam Speaker: You are supposed to…  \nDr. Aumeer: Can I ask the hon. Prime Minister whether he will consider that a medical \nunit be made available either in Melrose Clinic or at the FCC, particularly with specialised \ncare in cardiology, because most of them have cardiac issues, to avoid the tactical use of \nmedical conditions to remain in such hospital institutions? \nMs Savabaddy: Very good! \nThe Prime Minister: I totally agree with the hon. Member and I can tell him and the \nHouse that this, in fact, is being considered by the hon. Attorney General and we are going to \ncome with legislation addressing this issue.   \nDr. Aumeer: Last question? \nMadam Speaker: Yes.  \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I know I am taking a lot time today, but it is \nmy speciality, my expertise. \nMadam Speaker: Don’t waste time then! \nDr. Aumeer: Will the hon. Prime Minister use his good office to advise the Ministry of \nHealth to allow Specialists or Senior Specialists in subspeciality care to visit suspected \npeople who have been conveyed by the FCC or Central CID at public hospitals and give them \nthe authority to liaise with them to provide the best medical attention so that, once again, the \nuse of private institutions cannot be used as an attempt to show justice à deux vitesses? Thank \nyou.  \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, again, I totally agree with the hon. Member, and we are \naddressing this issue. We have public hospitals – why the hell do they have to go to private \nclinics and stay in comfort? No, this is going to be addressed. \nMr Jhummun: Ar nou non! \nAn hon. Member: Bravo! Bravo! \n\n33 \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. I will allow hon. Jhummun a last question and I will \ngive you your supplementary as well. \nMr Jhummun: Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nSILVER BANK LTD – GRANT THORNTON FEES – TOXIC LOANS \nRECOVERY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1116",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1116,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1116) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Silver Bank Ltd., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Bank of \nMauritius, information as to the amount of – \n(a) \nfees paid to – \n(i) \nGrant Thornton; \n(ii) \nMr A. K. G., and \n(iii) \nany other firm or individual acting as Conservator therefor since 13 \nFebruary 2024 to date, and \n(b) \ntoxic loans recovered therefrom since February 2024 to date.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, in my reply to PQ B/405 on 06 May 2025, I \ninformed the House that an amount Rs3.55 billion was deposited by government-related \nentities in Silver Bank Limited. This was purposely done to create a misleading enhancement \nof the bank’s balance sheet. \nThe decision to invest so much money in such a dubious bank with no track record was \noutright incompetence bordering, I should say, on criminal offence in the exercise of the \nprevious administration’s duty in safeguarding public funds.  So much was invested in the \nSilver Bank Limited despite the then government themselves issuing a circular requesting \ngovernment-related entities to invest their surplus cash balances into the Treasury \nCertificates, which are much safer. \nThey issued the circular, and yet, this is what they did with Silver Bank! Stealing public \nmoney – that is what they were doing! As at date, more than Rs900 million are still due to \nthese government-related entities. \n\n34 \n \nI am informed that the Bank of Mauritius, by virtue of section 65 of the Banking Act \n2004, appointed Mr Arvindsingh K. Gokhool as Conservator of Silver Bank Limited on 13 \nFebruary 2024. And believe it or not, a monthly fee of Rs3.5 million was payable as \nconservation fee. \nSince Mr Gokhool was a Director of Advisory Services at Grant Thornton (Advisory \nServices) Ltd., the monthly fee was payable to the company.  \nAs from 16 November 2024, the Bank of Mauritius negotiated the fee and it was \nrevised downward to Rs2.5 million per month. \nI am informed by the Bank of Mauritius that the current management retained the \nservices of Mr Gokhool as it would have been costly to replace him.  \nHowever, the new management decided that even the Rs2.5 million was too high and \nreduced it to Rs1.5 million as from 18 December 2024. \nDue to the substantial delay in finalising the proposed sale of Silver Bank Limited, the \nnew management of the Bank of Mauritius further reduced the fee to Rs300,000 per month \nwith effect as from 01 February 2025. \nWith regard to part (a) (i) of the question, I am informed that the Bank of Mauritius, for \nthe period from 13 February 2024 to March 2025, has paid a sum of Rs39.7 million to Grant \nThornton (Advisory Services) Ltd. who is the employer of Mr Arvindsingh Gokhool. \nAs regards part (a) (ii) of the question, I am informed by the Bank of Mauritius that on \n31 March 2025, Mr Gokhool resigned from Grant Thornton (Advisory Services) Ltd., but the \nconservation fee of Rs300,000 per month is now being paid to Vedaanta A&A Services Ltd., \nof which, the same Mr Gokhool is the sole shareholder and director.  An amount of Rs2.3 \nmillion has been paid to Vedaanta A&A Services Ltd. from April 2025 to date. \nWith regard to part (a) (iii) of the question, I am informed by the Bank of Mauritius that \nno other firm or individual, except Mr Gokhool, has served as Conservator of Silver Bank \nLimited since 13 February 2024. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Bank of Mauritius that, for the \nperiod of February 2024 to 27 November 2025, only Rs206.3 million have been recovered \nout of the total loan portfolio of Rs8.2 billion of Silver Bank Limited. This, Madam Speaker, \nrepresents only 2.5 percent of the total portfolio. \n\n35 \n \nThis gives us a stark indication of just how toxic the Silver Bank’s loan portfolio is. The \ntoxicity of the loan portfolio was directly exacerbated by the influence of the previous \ngovernment.  \nI must say to the House that it is a shame that he is still there! But there are reasons that \nthey have given me because of the cost of paying compensation and all those things. But all \nof this will be subject to an inquiry. \nMadam Speaker: Mr Jhummun, time is up. I said I would give him one, but time is \nalready up. \nThe Table has been advised that the following PQs have been withdrawn: B/1119, \nB/1120, B/1121, B/1122, B/1123 and B/1125. Thank you.  \nNow, we go to questions to Ministers. Hon. Caserne! \nMAUPASS – REGISTERED USERS & ENROLMENT STRATEGIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1117",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1117,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1117) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the proposed strategic partnership between Air Mauritius and Qatar Airways, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by Air Mauritius Ltd that, as at 27 November 2025, the company \nhas not been approached regarding any proposed strategic partnership with Qatar Airways. \nHowever, I wish to inform the House that the Qatari Authorities have approached the \nGovernment for the conclusion of a Bilateral Air Services Agreement between Mauritius and \nQatar. The request is currently under consideration. \nRODRIGUES – DOMESTIC & FAMILY VIOLENCE – NUMBER OF REPORTED \nCASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1118",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1118,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1118) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to domestic and family \nviolence against women, children and men in Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the number of reported cases \nthereof on a yearly basis over the past five years to date, indicating the overall nature of the \noffences.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that from 2020 to 27 November \n2025, a total of 608 cases of domestic violence and family violence pertaining to 531 women, \n20 children and 57 men have been reported to the Police in Rodrigues. The yearly breakdown \nis as follows – \n(i) \n62 domestic violence and 2 family violence cases in 2020;  \n(ii) \n96 domestic violence and 2 family violence cases in 2021; \n(iii) 79 domestic violence and 9 family violence cases in 2022; \n(iv) 106 domestic violence and 3 family violence cases in 2023;  \n\n118 \n \n(v) \n126 domestic violence and 7 family violence cases in 2024, and \n(vi) 113 domestic violence and 3 family violence cases as at 27 November 2025. \nI am further informed that a range of measures is being implemented in Rodrigues to \nprevent and address domestic and gender-based violence. The Brigade pour la Protection de \nla Famille works jointly with the Commission for Women’s Affairs, Child Development, \nFamily Welfare, Consumer Protection and Handicraft, NGOs and the National Empowerment \nFoundation to provide a holistic response to this social ill.  The following measures and \nactions have been implemented – \n(i) \na one-stop shop has been established at Malabar where Police officers, the Family \nProtection Unit, the Child Development Unit, Family Counselling Officers and a \npsychologist work together to offer integrated support and assistance to victims;  \n(ii) \nprovision of immediate protection and temporary accommodation for victims of \ndomestic violence at the Emergency Shelter operating under the Commission. \nThis facility is being restructured into a Rehabilitation and Empowerment Home \nfor women affected by traumatic experiences, with a view to offering more \ncomprehensive support and long-term reintegration services; \n(iii) a hotline 117 operated on a 24/7 basis by the Commission;  \n(iv) support to victims in terms of legal assistance through a dedicated Legal Resource \nPerson to make applications for protection and occupation orders and provision of \ncounselling on family issues; \n(v) \nsensitisation and awareness campaigns at community level and through the \nmedia; \n(vi) elaboration of an Action Plan by the Commission to combat social issues in \nRodrigues and launching of the Rodrigues Gender Policy 2025–2030 in \nSeptember 2025; \n(vii) implementation of various programmes such as Placement programmes and the \nSMART Farming Project to promote economic independence of victims, and \n(viii) promoting gender-equality through the “Maniere elvé tifi tigarson” programme \nimplemented with Regroupman Fam Centre Carrefour and leadership \nprogrammes to empower women and girls. \n\n119 \n \nThe 16 Days of Activism Against Gender-Based Violence, organised by the \nParliamentary Gender Caucus, also saw the participation of the hon. Members of Parliament \nand participants from Rodrigues. \n I wish to reassure the House that Government remains firmly committed to a zero-\ntolerance policy and a victim-centered approach to domestic abuse. To further deter such \noffences and strengthen support for victims, the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family \nWelfare is currently working on a new Domestic Abuse Bill to replace the existing Protection \nfrom Domestic Violence Act. As I have stated recently, laws alone cannot end violence. Real \nchange requires a united whole-of-society effort including government, law enforcement, \ncivil society, educators, the private sector, communities and families. \nFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS – BANK CHARGES & COLLATERAL SECURITIES – \nREVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1119",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1119,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1119) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the bank charges, fees and collateral securities regarding loans granted by financial \ninstitutions, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Bank of Mauritius, \ninformation as to – \n(a) \nwhen same were last reviewed, and \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given to aligning same to international norms and \nstandards applicable in other jurisdictions.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFALSE DRIVING LICENCES – REPORTED ACCIDENTS – LEGAL ACTIONS & \nAPPLICABLE PENALTIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1120",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1120,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1120) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the rising number \nof false driving licences, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information \nas to the – \n\n120 \n \n(i) \nnumber of reported cases thereof, indicating the number of accidents \ninvolving persons having a false licence or no licence over the past 10 \nyears, and \n(ii) \nlegal actions taken and penalties applicable in such cases, and \n(b) \nstate if consideration will be given for the introduction of – \n(i) \nbiometric driving licence, and \n(ii) \nautomated licence Plate Recognition and in-car computer systems to track \nflagged vehicles and drivers.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPRISONS’ DETAINEES– HIV POSITIVE CASES – SENSITISATION \nACTIVITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1121",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1121,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1121) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to prisons, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Prisons, information as to the \nnumber of persons detained thereat, indicating the number thereof who are HIV positive \nfurther indicating whether – \n(a) \nthey – \n(i) \ncontracted same inside or outside the prison; \n(ii) \nare segregated and, if not, why not, and  \n(iii) \nare under Antivectorial treatment in line with WHO guidelines, and \n(b) \nawareness and sensitisation activities will be carried out thereat in connection \nwith World AIDS Day in December.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nDHYANAVARTAM LTD – LOANS GRANTED – ENQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1122",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1122,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1122) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the loans granted by the State Bank of Mauritius and the Mauritius Investment \nCorporation to Dhyanavartam Ltd., between 2022 and 2024, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Financial Crimes Commission, information as to whether an enquiry \nhas been initiated thereinto and, if so, where matters stand, indicating the – \n\n121 \n \n(a) \nnumber of persons interrogated and/or arrested so far, and \n(b) \nactions taken, if any, to recover these loans, given that the said company has \nalready initiated winding-up procedures.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSSR AIRPORT – TAXI OPERATORS’ SECURITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1123",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1123,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1123) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the taxi \noperators at the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the measures being \nenvisaged to –   \n(a) \nensure the security thereof, especially, following the recent reported case of \naggression on or about 15 November 2025, and \n(b) \nprevent any illegal taxi operation thereat and if there has been any reported case \nof alleged illegal transfer of taxi licence to operate thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nUNAUTHORISED ONLINE MONEY WITHDRAWAL – CASES & OUTCOMES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1124",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1124,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1124) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port-Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the unauthorised online withdrawal of money from the accounts of customers of \nlocal banks, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Cybercrime Unit of the \nMauritius Police Force, information as to the reported number of cases thereof over the past \nthree years, indicating the – \n(a) \nbanks concerned therewith; \n(b)  outcome of inquiries carried out in relation to the responsibility of the banks \npursuant to section 51 of the Banking Act, and  \n(c) \nnumber of prosecutions carried out and convictions secured, if any.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that reported cases of \nunauthorised withdrawal of money from the bank accounts of customers through online \nbanking are dealt with as an offence of electronic fraud under Section 14 of the Cybersecurity \nand Cybercrime Act 2021.  Since January 2023 to 27 November 2025, 48 cases of such \n\n122 \n \nelectronic fraud have been referred to the Cybercrime Unit of the Police. Out of the 48 cases \nreferred to the Police, 4 have been classified and enquiry into the remaining 44 cases are \nongoing. \nFurthermore, for the same period, eight other cases of electronic fraud have been \nreported at the Crime Investigation Team Unit of the Police. Out of the eight cases, one has \nbeen classified and enquiry into the remaining seven cases are ongoing. \nIn regard to parts (a) and (b) of the question, I am informed that it would not be proper \nto reveal the names of the banks concerned due to confidentiality reasons. However, this \nproblem affects all major banks. \nI am further informed that pursuant to Section 51 of the Banking Act, any bank may \nprovide to its customers remote access to their accounts through computers using propriety \nsoftware or the Internet. These authorised banks should provide adequate security for their \nInternet or proprietary platforms. The security features in such systems should include \ncustomer authentication, appropriate documentation and for physical and logical protection \nagainst unauthorised external access in any form, whether by individual penetration attempts, \ncomputer viruses, denial of service, and other forms of electronic access. \nWhen the occurrence of an incident is reported, the concerned bank has to conduct a \nroot cause analysis and submit a report thereon to the Bank of Mauritius within 20 days of the \nincident reporting. The Bank of Mauritius may require banks to enhance their controls or \nsecurity measures, from a supervisory point of view, based on the root cause analysis. \nFurthermore, the Bank of Mauritius has issued a guideline on Cyber and Technology \nRisk Management in 2023 with a view to addressing the increasing cyber threat landscape \narising from the accelerated digital transformation of the financial sector. The guideline sets \nout the minimum requirements which banks and payment service providers are expected to \nimplement with respect to cyber and technology risk management to ensure that the risks are \nwell understood and managed appropriately. \nI am further informed that banks are required to report all unauthorised withdrawal of \nfunds to the Bank of Mauritius. Enquiry has revealed that in most cases, they refer to scams \nwhere the customers themselves have provided details of their accounts to scammers, \nincluding their One-Time Password. \n\n123 \n \nThe banks, therefore, cannot be held responsible in these cases. Banks should continue \nsensitising their customers not to provide their bank details to third parties to avoid such \nfrauds. \nSSR AIRPORT – PASSENGER HANDLING ENHANCEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1125",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1125,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1125) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the departure and arrival of passengers at the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam \nInternational Airport, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe measures being taken to streamline the different processes/steps thereat, \nindicating, in each case, the time frame for the implementation thereof, and \n(b) \nwhere matters stand as to the implementation of a new border control \nmanagement system thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS – IMPLEMENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1126",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1126,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1126) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Sustainable \nDevelopment Goals (SDGs), he will state – \n(a) \nwhere matters stand as to the implementation thereof, and \n(b)  whether consideration will be given for the establishment of an SDG Committee \nat the National Assembly.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIUS POLICE FORCE –TASER & BODY CAMERAS – DEPLOYMENT \nPLAN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1127",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1127,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1127) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the proposed introduction of taser and body cameras in the Police Force, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the \ntimeline for the implementation thereof, giving details of the Police units to be equipped \ntherewith, including the quantity and total estimated cost thereof. \n\n124",
      "answer": "Reply:  I wish to refer the hon. Member to the reply I made to PQ B/971 of the Sitting \nof 11 November 2025, wherein I stated that the Commissioner of Police has already set up a \ntechnical committee to work on the required amendments to the relevant legislations and the \nstandard operating procedures for the introduction of both body-worn cameras and taser use \nby the Police.  \nI am informed that, on 07 November 2025, the Attorney-General’s Office has already \nbeen requested to work on the amendments to the relevant pieces of legislation for an \nappropriate legal framework for the use of the body-worn cameras. In parallel, the \nCommissioner of Police with the assistance of the technical committee is looking into the \nfollowing aspects of the project – \n• \nTechnical specifications and financial implications; \n• \nUnits of the Mauritius Police Force which will be equipped with both body-worn \ncameras and taser, and \n• \nStandard Operating Procedures. \nWith regard to the use of body-worn cameras, the Police Department is already in \npossession of 4,500 EP820 Radios which are equipped with cameras to record videos. These \nvideos will be stored on the servers at the Government Online Centre and the Main \nCommand Centre of the Police Department will, at the same time, view or livestream the \nvideos. Straps to support the cameras are being manufactured in-house by the Police \nDepartment.  As soon as the legal and operational frameworks are finalised, the use of body-\nworn cameras would be implemented immediately after. \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 6 – FOOTBALL TOURNAMENTS ORGANISATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1128",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1128,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/1128) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation \nwhether, in regard to MauPass application, he will state the current number of registered \nusers thereof, indicating – \n(a) \nthe measures being envisaged to reach a maximum number of persons, and \n(b) \nif consideration will be given for citizens reaching the age of eighteen and \napplying for the National Identity Card to be automatically registered thereto.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: Madam Speaker, I would like to thank the hon. Member for this \nquestion. The MauPass application is a single sign-on platform which creates the bridge \nbetween the physical world and the virtual world. So, it helps the Government identify \ncitizens using services which are deployed on the internet deployed by the Government. It is \na very critical application. Hence, I understand the question. \nServices that are available today for which we have to authenticate through MauPass \ninclude applications for jobs with the Public Service Commission, downloading birth \ncertificates and marriage certificates, renewal of motor vehicle licences, application for \nCertificate of Character. So, we can count more than hundred, Madam Speaker. \nAs regards to part one of the question, the MauPass application has, as at 01 December \n2025, 427,467 users or Mauritians registered on that system.  \n\n36 \n \nAs the House is aware, on 26 May 2025, we actually published the blueprint, and the \nblueprint takes into consideration the usage of MauPass and the promotion of that usage. My \nMinistry has, therefore, embarked on a massive onboarding process to increase the number of \nMauPass users. During the period of July to August 2025, eight awareness sessions were \nconducted at different malls across the island mainly during weekends to educate citizens on \nMauPass platform and to help them create there MauPass accounts. The post office as well is \nalso engaged in that activity. \nWe are also using the social welfare centres. We touched around 1,866 citizens with \nthat. These efforts yielded 12,934 new registrations of citizens on MauPass platform. So, \nMadam Speaker, the initiatives that have been undertaken by my Ministry to reach a \nmaximum number of users have been ongoing. To reach further citizens, a team from my \nMinistry trained around 209 officers at eight community centres and 25 officers working in \nthe social welfare centres on the creation of MauPass accounts. Similar activities will now be \nundertaken with the Citizen’s Advice Bureaus.  \nWith respect to part (b) of the question, Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House \nthat as per paragraph 6 of the National Identity Card Regulations 2024, an applicant for a new \nidentity card may opt for the creation of a MauPass account and the installation of digital \ncertificates on his/her identity card.  \nSince the implementation of the new identity card in February 2024, 146,771 citizens \nhave opted for a MauPass account while applying for a new identity card. Thank you, Madam \nSpeaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nHon. Members, the Table has been advised that PQ B/1133 will be replied by the hon. \nMinister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity. PQ B/1150 will be \nreplied by the hon. Minister of National Infrastructure.  \nNow, we proceed with the hon. Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle! \nRIVIERE DES CREOLES & NOUVELLE FRANCE – COASTAL REGION – \nFLOODING PRONE AREAS – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1129",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1129,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/1129) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the coastal region of \nRivière des Créoles and to Nouvelle France, classified red zones in terms of flooding, he will \n\n37 \n \nstate the emergency measures, if any, taken by his Ministry ahead of the forthcoming rainy \nseason.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the drain works in the South-East \nregion concern six villages namely, Rivière des Créoles, Vieux Grand Port, Bois des \nAmourettes, Anse Jonché, Providence, Petit Sable, Grand Sable and Bambous Virieux. \nWith a view to mitigating flooding in the region, the NDU has appointed consultant \nServansingh Jadav & Partners Consulting Engineers Ltd for a thorough study of the whole \nregion. \nGeotechnical investigation has also been carried out to assess soil stabilisation \nmeasures along track roads and mountain slopes before proceeding with the construction of \nmajor cut-off drains in all the six villages. The detailed design report has already been \nfinalised and the whole project is estimated to cost some Rs576.15 million including VAT \nand contingencies. \nThe consultant has been requested to advise on immediate short-term measures which \nmay be implemented to bring relief to the inhabitants, pending implementation of the drain \nproject holistically. \nMadam Speaker, the Road Development Authority has also implemented two projects \nat Rivière des Créoles, as follows – \n1. \nConstruction of a reinforced concrete parapet wall along diverted drainage path at \nRivière des Créoles near under path at Rivière des Créoles. \n2. \nStabilisation works, design and built on turnkey basis at Rivière des Créoles \nalong South Eastern Highway A15. \nMadam Speaker, with regards to the region of Nouvelle France, I have to inform the \nHouse that the NDU has already implemented drain projects in different alignments as \nfollows –  \n(i) \nAlignment 3 – drain works along A9 road; \n(ii) \nAlignment 3.1 to 3.3 upstream of A9, and Alignment 6 from Kovil to near \nCommunity Centre; \n(iii) Construction of retention basin Pond C in the region of Kanpur, Nouvelle France, \nand \n\n38 \n \n(iv) Desilting of River La Chaux, 1 km stretch. \nAnd other flood mitigating projects undertaken by RDA include – \n(i) \nredesigned of Nouvelle France roundabout on motorway M1,  \n(ii) \ndrain works along A10 at Nouvelle France at the level of Nouvelle France police \nstation to roundabout of motorway M1, and  \n(iii) alignment 6.1 drain works along A10. \nMadam Speaker, as advised by the LDA, the NDU has also embarked on the \nconstruction of retention basins and drainage alignment along the upstream of Save Mart, \nComlone region and Savanne Link Road. \nThe design was approved by the LDA on 30 September 2025 and action is being \ninitiated for land acquisition and way leaves. \nMadam Speaker, as immediate measures both the Road Development Authority and the \nDistrict Council of Grand Port have been requested to proceed with the cleaning of drains and \nculverts within their jurisdiction in the villages of Rivière des Créoles and Nouvelle France as \nper the maintenance plan approved by the LDA. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Ramdass! \nMr Ramdass: Madam Speaker, is the hon. Minister aware of a number of inhabitants \nin respect of the Rivière des Créoles area of the number of inhabitants affected by the floods \nand is he also aware that certain families has had to leave their houses to seek refuge \nelsewhere in times of flooding? \nMr Gunness: Madam Speaker, I am aware that is why we say we are working on \nshort-term immediate measures and long-term as a holistic measure and the consultant are \nworking and I have even given the cost of a holistic project where Rs576 million; we know in \nwhich financial situation we are. We are trying to get financial clearance so as to do the \nproject holistically. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Ramdass: You see, I take note of the cost to the tune of Rs576 million. May we \nhave an indication from the hon. Minister as to when the works may be expected to start and \nif at all, it can be considered in stages at least to alleviate the suffering of these people in \nthese areas? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister. Can you give that undertaking? \n\n39 \n \nMr Gunness: I think, I have said in my answer that the consultant has been requested \nto advise on immediate short-term measures which may be implemented to bring relief to the \ninhabitants pending implementation of the drain project holistically. So, we wait for the \nconsultant to give us the short-term measures that have to be done. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, I think that should be all right. You still want to ? No! \nHon. Dr. Ms B. Thannoo, please! The Hon. Second Member for Quartier Militaire. \nYes! \nLANDSLIDES & EROSION – FLOOD-PRONE SEASONS – DAMAGED \nHOUSES – EVACUATION ORDERS & MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1130",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1130,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/1130) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka)  \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands Whether, in regard to the dwellings severely \nendangered by landslides and erosion over the period 2019 to 2024 during the flood-prone \nseasons, he will state the number of occupiers thereof who were served an \"order to \nevacuate\", indicating the number of such dwellings which are still occupied as at date and the \nmeasures being envisaged to ensure the safety of the occupiers thereof ahead of the 2025-\n2026 flood season.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Member for this question. At the \noutset, however, I wish to clarify that my Ministry is not responsible for issuing of evacuation \norders for dwellings exposed to landslides, erosion or flooding. \nEvacuation orders are issued by the National Crisis Committee in accordance with \nsection 16(2) of the National Disaster Risk Reduction Management Act of 2016, directing \nany person to evacuate their premises or any public place or directing any person in a \nparticular area to be evacuated within a certain specific time. \nI am informed that so far one evacuation order was issued at Rivière des Créoles, five \nevacuation orders were issued in the region of St Pierre and Verdun and six evacuation orders \nwere issued in Souillac during the period 2019 to 2024. \nFurthermore, the National Disaster Risk Reduction Management Centre has informed \nthat some 86 families are still residing in their dwellings located at areas classified as being at \nrisk of landslides and erosion. Surveys are also ongoing in other areas such as Crève Coeur \nand St Pierre particularly along the Rivière Profonde stretch. \nAs regards, the measures, Madam Speaker, already in place and those planned to \nsafeguard residents living in high-risk zones ahead of 2025-2026 flood season, I am informed \nthat regular simulation exercises, sensitisation campaigns and awareness initiatives are being \ncarried out jointly with the local authorities. \n\n40 \n \nIn addition, during the rainy and cyclonic periods, the following actions are, inter alia, \nundertaken –  \n1. \nContinuous monitoring of vulnerable sites; \n2. \nRegular police patrols; \n3. \nIssuance of alerts to expose families to the National Multi-Hazard Early Alert \nSystems, and \n4. \nPrepositioning and deployment of first responders including the SMF, the \nMauritius Fire Rescue Services and the Special Support Unit and the regular \npolice. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. \nYes, hon. Ms Thannoo! \nDr. Ms Thannoo: Thank you, hon. Minister. Are Japanese experts currently involved in \nthe geotechnical approach to the surveys, please? I know the experts are currently employed \nat the Ministry of Infrastructure. Thank you. \nMr Mohamed: As I have said at the very outset of my answer. My Ministry is not \nresponsible for evacuation orders. \nI gave the information that I obtained from all other ministries as to what work is being \ndone. Now, as far as specifics are concerned, I would invite the hon. Member, Madam \nSpeaker, to put a question to the substantive Minister responsible for such geotechnical \ninvestigations. \nIt would not be within the ambit of my portfolio and, therefore, I would not be able to \ngive the answer to the hon. Member. \nMadam Speaker:  Yes, hon. Member, you will do that, I am sure. \nNow, I have the hon. Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nYes, hon. A. Duval! \nMAURITIUS TAMIL CULTURAL CENTRE TRUST – CULTURAL CENTRE \nBUILDING CONSTRUCTION - RÉDUIT TRIANGLE – FINANCIAL SUPPORT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1131",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1131,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/1131) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the Mauritius Tamil \nCultural Centre Trust, he will state if financial support from Government is being envisaged \nfor the construction of a Cultural Centre building at Réduit Triangle, as pledged by \nL’Alliance du Changement during the 2024 General Elections. \n\n41",
      "answer": "Mr Gondeea: Madam Speaker, with due respect, before addressing the question on \nfunding, it is important for this House to recall the circumstances surrounding the land \nallocated to the Mauritius Tamil Cultural Centre Trust. \nThe land at Réduit Triangle, Moka, was originally leased to the Mauritius Tamil \nCultural Centre Trust in August 2010 together with the Hindi Speaking Union and the Urdu \nSpeaking Union, under the prime ministership of Dr. the hon. Navinchandra Ramgoolam. \nThis was done in recognition of the long-standing cultural contribution of these \ncommunities and as part of a coherent national vision to support and strengthen our \nmulticultural identity. \nHowever, in April 2023, the previous government cancelled that lease. Madam \nSpeaker, it is publicly known that this decision was taken at a time when attempts were being \nmade to divert the land to individuals closely connected to those in power. Such actions \nunderstandably generated deep resentment within the Tamil community and raised legitimate \nconcerns about fairness and preferential treatment. \nMadam Speaker, the retrieval of the land was regarded by the Tamil community as a \nprofound injustice. In August 2024, members of the community, together with the Rann Nou \nLater movement, organised a peaceful march to defend their legitimate rights. Unfortunately, \nthis peaceful mobilisation was met with arbitrary arrests. This caused further distress and \nraised serious concerns among Mauritians regarding dignity, justice and the protection of \nfundamental freedom.  \nWhat was equally troubling, Madam Speaker, is that after nearly ten years of inaction, \nthe previous Government suddenly announced, almost on the eve of the 2024 general \nelections, that it would construct buildings for the three organisations whose leases had been \ncancelled. These organisations had been shifted to Côte d’Or. The timing and manner of this \nannouncement strongly suggest that it was motivated more by political mileage than by any \ngenuine project supported by planning, funding or long-term commitment.  \nMadam Speaker, upon returning to office in November 2024, this Government moved \nswiftly and responsibly to correct this injustice created. We honoured our commitment to the \nTamil community by restoring the land at Réduit Triangle. A new lease agreement was signed \non 20 May 2025, reinstating the Mauritius Tamil Cultural Centre Trust legitimate rights and \nrectifying the unfairness that had been inflicted.  \n\n42 \n \nTurning now to the specific question of funding raised by the hon. Member, I wish to \nclearly state that l’Alliance du Changement never pledged to provide financial support for the \nconstruction of a cultural centre building for the Mauritius Tamil Cultural Centre Trust. \nFurthermore, this Government is not constructing any cultural centre building for any \ncommunity at this stage. The economic situation inherited by this Government has been \nnothing short of catastrophic. We are therefore required to prioritise essential national \nobligations such as stabilising public finances, reinforcing social protection systems and \nmeeting urgent service delivery needs. In this context, embarking on new capital incentives, \ncultural infrastructure projects would not be responsible or sustainable at the moment. This, \nin no way, diminishes our unwavering commitment to promote and safeguard the culture and \nheritage of all communities, including the Tamil community. It simply reflects the fiscal \nreality that this Government must manage responsibly. \nMadam Speaker, this Government remains firmly committed to fairness, transparency \nand respect for all communities. We will continue to act responsibly and with full regard to \nfiscal discipline, transparency and long-term sustainability in the cultural sector, unlike our \npredecessor. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes? \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, in fact, promises had been made during the campaign; \nmaybe the Minister will not recall. I can tell you the names of Members who have… \nMadam Speaker: Question, please! Question! \nMr A. Duval: …gone as far at the radio to say so. Well, I will ask the hon. Minister \nwhether, there has been any representation with his Ministry with regard to financial support \nfor the construction which is pending there for more than 20 years now? \nMr Gondeea: I think that I have already replied to the question. We have not \ncommitted ourselves. \nMr A. Duval: No, no, representations. \nMadam Speaker: No, whether there were representations. \nMr Gondeea: No, nothing at all. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nMr A. Duval: May I have a second question? \n\n43 \n \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nMr A. Duval: May I ask whether he is prepared to receive representations from the \nMTCC with regard to constructions given that the promise has been made and… \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Member! \nMr A. Duval: I maintain… \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Member! \nMr A. Duval: I maintain and that, therefore the subject matter ought to be discussed \nwith them? \nMadam Speaker: The hon. Minister said that there was no promise. You are asking \nhim if he will meet representatives. Maybe you can meet representatives, hon. Minister. Yes? \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: He must give evidence! \nMadam Speaker: But maybe the hon. Minister can meet representatives, not \nnecessarily for what he says. \nMr Gondeea: Why should we meet if we are not going to… \nMadam Speaker: If nobody asked? \nMr Gondeea: Yes. \nMadam Speaker: But if somebody asks you? \nMr Gondeea: If they ask, yes, of course, we will meet them. \nMadam Speaker: You would meet them. On est à Maurice! \nMr Gondeea: With pleasure, we will meet them, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: On est à Maurice, on est bien élevé. Allez, now I have a few \nminutes.  \nHon. Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien, Mr Apollon!  \nMAHEBOURG MARKET FAIR – PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION – EXPECTED \nCOMPLETION DATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1132",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1132,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1132) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the proposed construction of a \n\n44 \n \nMarket Fair near the Youth Centre in Mahebourg, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the District Council of Grand Port, information as to where matters stand, indicating the \nexpected completion date thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMadam Speaker: This question has been withdrawn. J’ai beaucoup de mal à suivre. \nThis question has been withdrawn. On m’envoie des tas de petits papiers. Il va falloir trouver \nun meilleur système.  \nOkay, so if the question has been withdrawn, I propose that we break for lunch!                          \nAt 12.52 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.35 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated! Hon. Rookny! \nFREE INTERNET SCHEME – BENEFICIARIES, PAYMENT & \nIMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1133",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1133,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/1133) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, with \nregard to the sum of Rs 84 million allocated in the 2025–2026 National Budget for the \nscheme providing free internet to families registered on the Social Register, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to where matters stand, indicating the – \n(a) \nnumber of families already benefitting therefrom and the average monthly cost \nper connection borne by Government;  \n(b) \nsum already disbursed and the disbursement schedule for the remaining amount \nthereof, and  \n(c) \nexpected timeline for full rollout to all eligible families.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity (Mr A. Subron): Madam Speaker, please allow me to provide the reply to this question as the budget \nmeasure 295 concerns my Ministry. \n\n45 \n \nFrom the outset, let me convey to my colleague, hon. Members, and the House the \nfollowing – \n(i) \nWith regard to parts (a) and (c) of the question, the scheme is expected to be \nimplemented as from the end of this year and fully rolled out by the first quarter of \n2026. In this context, provision is being made to fully cover 7,468 households and \nfamilies on the SRM in both Mauritius and Rodrigues to benefit from this budget \nmeasure. \n(ii) \nWith regard part (b) of the question, payment will be made to internet service \nproviders upon provision of the internet to SRM households who applied and are \nprovided with same. \nMadam Speaker, following the announcement of this budgetary measure, the National \nEmpowerment Foundation (NEF) carried out a survey amongst its beneficiaries who consist \nof persons of the Social Register of Mauritius (SRM) and have signed a social contract to \nbenefit from its services. The surveys pointed out that only around an estimated 10% of the \nfamilies of the Social Register of Mauritius presently have a home-based internet connection. \nAround 90% have expressed interest to avail of the free internet connection.  \nMy Ministry then engaged in consultations with relevant stakeholders, namely the \nMinistry of Finance, the Information and Communication Technologies Authority (ICTA) \nand the National Empowerment Foundation to work out modalities for the implementation of \nthis budgetary measure. Consultations were also held with the Mauritius Revenue Authority \n(MRA) to understand the mechanism in place for persons to benefit from the 18-25 free \nmobile phone scheme.  \nAfter thorough reflections emanating from these consultations, my Ministry has \ndecided that eligible SRM beneficiaries will have the choice to select from the three available \ncommercial packages, as per the recommendation of the ICTA, offered by the three internet \nservice providers, that is, Mauritius Telecom, Emtel Ltd and Mahanagar Telephone Mauritius \nLimited (MTML). Thus, the 7,468 households will have the possibility of making their own \nchoices and no specific ISP will be designated. So, the new provision will be a people’s \nchoice-based system. \n\n46 \n \nIn this context, the State Informatics Limited (SIL) is working on an online platform \nwith the assistance of the Mauritius Revenue Authority to translate this people’s choice-based \nsystem to ensure efficient implementation and monitoring of the scheme and ensure effective \ncommunication between the Ministry and the internet service providers.  \nOnce the SIL online platform is finalised, NEF will issue notices to all SRM eligible \nhouseholds to inform of the packages available and of the modalities to avail of same. The \nhead of the household will have to apply for his or her chosen package directly from the \nselected ISP and its respective outlets, similar to any citizen applying to benefit from any \ngiven internet package. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform that the Government has provided, in fact, Rs85 \nmillion yearly over a period of three years each for this particular scheme under the National \nResilience Fund. Let me reassure the hon. Member and the House that the three years’ period \nwill start as from the date on which the measures become effective so that no prejudice is \ncaused to any of the registered poor family of the country. \nMy Ministry is committed, as is this caring government, to ensure the implementation \nof this measure to provide some 7,500 families and 27,000 people with internet connection so \nas to be digitally connected and avail of the facilities linked thereto, particularly for \neducational purposes. Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes, hon. Rookny! \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, I would like to ask the hon. Minister if he could advise, \nof the Rs85 million earmarked per financial year, and given that the project would be fully \nrolled out at the end of the first quarter of 2026, how much of the said sum will be spent in \nthe first financial year? \nMr Subron: As I have just stated, as from the date of the implementation of the \nproject, the three years budget will be applied, that is, the three years that have been \nearmarked, irrespective of the start date of the implementation. So, up to now, no money has \nbeen spent. It will be spent either in December for the first three years from next year, and \nthen the three years will apply for all those eligible to the package. \n \n\n47 \n \nRAINWATER HARVESTING SYSTEMS – ACCESSIBILITY & SCHEMES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1134",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1134,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/1134) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to rainwater harvesting \nsystems, he will state whether, with a view to alleviating water stress that impacts on daily \nfunctioning and sanitary requirements, his Ministry will consider – \n(a) \nimposing a profit ceiling thereon to increase the accessibility thereof for domestic \nusage, and  \n(b) \nimplementing viable schemes therefor in favour of public institutions.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMadam Speaker: So, now, the First Member for Savanne and Black River, Mr \nBabajee. \nCYBERBULLYING, ONLINE HARASSMENT/DIGITAL VIOLENCE – ONLINE \nSAFETY REGULATOR & SOCIAL MEDIA RESTRICTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1135",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1135,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/1135) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in regard to \nonline \nrisks, \nharms, \ncyberbullying \nand \nharassments \nand \nvictims \nthereof \nattempting/committing suicide, he will state whether consideration will be given for the – \n(a) \nestablishment of an independent online safety regulator with a highly qualified \ncommissioner at the head thereof, and  \n(b) \nbanning of social media to those under 16 years old.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: Madam Speaker, I would like to thank the hon. Member for this \nquestion. \nThis Government recognises that online harms, particularly those affecting children and \nvulnerable persons demand a structured and specialised institutional response and also \nbecause of the incidence that took place lately, including attempts to and cases of suicide. I \nam tabling some… \nMadam Speaker: I am sorry. Including one today, I understand. \n\n48 \n \nDr. Ramtohul: Sorry? \nMadam Speaker: Apparently, there has been one today as well. \nDr. Ramtohul: Yesterday. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, yesterday. \nDr. Ramtohul: And it was very, very sad. \nMadam Speaker: I am sorry. \nDr. Ramtohul: Over the last three years, Madam Speaker, there has been an increasing \nnumber of cases of cyberbullying, online harassment and other forms of digital violence, \nespecially against women. When we look at the statistics, which I will be tabling, those \nstatistics reveal numbers that speak loudly about the fact that women are more exposed to \ndigital violence.  \nEven though the Cybersecurity and Cybercrime Act 2021 already provides deterrent \nlegal provisions, my Ministry is actively working on amendments to the legislation to further \nstrengthen the protections, given the fast-evolving nature of online harms.  \nAgain, for three consecutive years, Madam Speaker, cybercrime has been on the rise. \nThe data was there. Parents were reporting cases, but the former government took no action. \nNo proposed amendments to the legislations. \nRegarding part (a) of the question, Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Attorney \nGeneral’s Office that the establishment of an independent online safety regulator, in line with \ninternational best practices such as the eSafety Commissioner of Australia, the Online Safety \nCommissioner in Ireland and the UK’s Online Safety Act under Ofcom, is under \nexamination.  \nIt is important to highlight that our current online safety ecosystem already includes \nseveral institutions, namely the ICTA, the Data Protection Commissioner’s Office, the Police \nCybercrime Unit and the Child Development Unit along with the Computer Emergency \nResponse Team. Together, these institutions play a critical role in protecting our children and \nall the users online. \n\n49 \n \nNevertheless, preliminary consultations with stakeholders are being held to determine \nthe most appropriate mechanism and options including the creation of an independent \nstatutory office headed by a highly qualified commissioner or the establishment of an online \nsafety unit within an existing regulator with guaranteed independence. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, concerning the proposed ban on social media access \nfor persons under 16 years old, Government is monitoring international developments \ncarefully, including Australia’s pioneering but technically challenging nation-wide restriction \naccompanied by an age assurance technology trial. \nThe Australian experience, Madam Speaker, reveals issues related to technical \naccuracy, privacy risks, implementation challenges and enforcement complexities that \nquestion the practicality of such a ban. In line with section 12 of our Constitution, which \nprotects freedom of expression and considers the digital rights and inclusion of minors, a full \nprohibition does not seem to be the solution. Similarly, there is also concern that a ban may \npush minors to unregulated platforms, potentially increasing risks.  \nThe former government treated cyber security as a side issue. Today, we are correcting \na decade of dangerous complacency, Madam Speaker. This Government instead prioritises a \nholistic approach that includes strengthened digital safety education and enhanced parent \ncontrol mechanisms including the imminent roll out of a set of child protection measures \nonline. \nThe House may wish to note that the ICTA is currently working on directives which are \nexpected to be issued in a matter of days. This measure, while being optional, allows parental \ncontrol through mobile devices in a first phase and control over Wi-Fi home routers in a \nsecond. The directives will mandate licensees to, inter alia, take necessary measures to curtail \nharmful and illegal content for protecting children online. \nMoreover, the government intends to actively engage with regional international \nbodies, namely – \n• the SADC; \n• the COMESA, and  \n\n50 \n \n• the African Union, in order to establish structured channels of corporation with \nmajor online platforms most of which do not have a physical presence in \nMauritius.  \nThis approach aims at improving platform accountability for the contents that are being \nhosted by those companies. \nI also wish to inform the House that amendments to the Cybersecurity and Cybercrime \nAct 2021 are being prepared to, inter alia, establish a national cyber resilience and cyber \nsecurity agency which will have as one of its key functions: online safety. Whether the \nindependent online safety regulators functions will be incorporated into this framework or \nnot, will depend on the outcomes of the ongoing assessments. \nMadam Speaker, it is known to one and all that our economic stability now depends \nupon our social as well as digital stability. It is therefore imperative that we ensure that \nelectronic platforms are safe and secure enough to protect our people. The past regime \npolitized people’s safety. We are taking responsibilities. They stood by as families, women \nand young people suffered digital violence. We, on the other hand, are coming with bold \nmeasures: legislative, institutional, operational and educational. \nOn a conclusive note, Madam Speaker, this Government is fully conscious of the \nincrease in online risks and the corresponding rise in the number of victims. This is why it is \nresolutely committed to protecting our population, especially children and vulnerable persons \nfrom online harms through legislation, institutional reform, education, technology and \ninternational corporation while at the same time upholding the constitutional rights. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister! \nMr Babajee, yes! \nMr Babajee: Will the hon. Minister consider introducing a 24/7 counselling and \nsupport services? As we saw, yesterday, someone committed suicide live and there was a gap \nbetween that, we could have contacted that institution? \nDr. Ramtohul: Thank you, hon. Member. We are looking at the problem from a \nholistic perspective. You would recall the Prime Minister’s visit to India and as a result, we \nare engaging with the Maharashtra Government for the establishment of certain services that \n\n51 \n \nwill include services from Ministry of Gender for Family Support as well and for support of \nvictims who are going though digital violence. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, alright. \nHon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nNEW GEORGE V STADIUM & ANJALAY COOPEN STADIUM – \nHOMOLOGATION REQUIREMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1136",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1136,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/1136) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether in regard to the New George V Stadium in \nCurepipe and the Anjalay Coopen Stadium in Belle Vue Harel, he will state whether his \nMinistry has applied for the homologation thereof, indicating the requirements therefor.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that it is the Mauritius \nFootball Association which is responsible for applying for homologation of a stadium in \nMauritius. In order for a stadium to host international football matches, they need to get \nhomologation by the Confédération Africaine de Football. The CAF is the governing body \nfor football in Africa and is one of the sixth continental confederation that make up the \nFédération Internationale de Football Association, that is, FIFA.  \nThe mandatory requirement to get homologation includes compliance with, inter alia –  \n• administration, documentation; \n• pitch or field of play; \n• technical areas of equipment;  \n• dressing room;  \n• team and official facilities;  \n• match official; \n• doping and Video Assistant Referee (VAR); \n• spectator areas and sitting; \n• safety, security and emergency services; \n• media, press and broadcast and lighting power, and  \n\n52 \n \n• communication. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that my Ministry is working in close \ncollaboration with the MFA towards the homologation of two stadiums. It was in this \nendeavour that inspection of both the New George V Stadium and the Anjalay Coopen \nStadium was carried out by Mr Joshua Knipp, CAF Stadium Inspector, during his mission to \nMauritius from 27 to 29 June 2025.  \nFollowing the CAF inspection, the MFA was informed that both the Anjalay Coopen \nStadium and New George V Stadium currently do not meet the minimum CAF Stadium \nrequirement to host international matches. The CAF Inspector highlighted that the Anjalay \nCoopen Stadium requires major upgrading works in several areas to meet homologation \nrequirement. The report also stated that the New George V Stadium would require a full \nrevamp and redesigned to comply with CAF Stadium standard. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to highlight that the absence of a homologation does not \nprevent the playing of local football matches in these stadiums. Nevertheless, my Ministry \nhas worked out a costing of the project and it goes without saying that significant fund will be \nrequired for such work. The upgrading works have already started on both stadium and will \nbe carried out in phases. My Ministry will continue to collaborate with the MFA and all \nrelevant stakeholders to ensure that the upgrading works meet CAF standard and fully the \nrequirement for homologation. A fresh inspection for the homologation process will be \ninitiated once the required works have been completed. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, one question! \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente, je vous remercie. Peut-on déduire de par la réponse \nde l’honorable ministre que son ministère de même que la MFA vont faire de l’homologation \nde ces deux stades une priorité de façon à ce que les matches de la sélection nationale ne se \njouent pas uniquement au stade de Côte d’Or devant moins de cinq mille spectateurs ? Alors \nma question est : est-ce que l’honorable ministre est en train de donner une priorité à ces deux \nstades pour être homologués dans un proche avenir ? \nMr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, like I said in my reply, the answer is here. We are \ndoing our best so that the two stadiums be homologated in the near future. \nMadam Speaker: And upgraded. Okay. \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente, rapidement, une dernière question. \n\n53 \n \nL’honorable ministre est sans doute au courant que par rapport aux deux derniers jeux \ndes îles qui ont été organisés ici à Maurice, l’État a dépensé plus de R 230 million pour la \nrénovation du stade George V.  \nDonc, peut-on savoir depuis son entré en fonction en tant que ministre de Sport…  \nMadam Speaker: Là, vous parlez d’un autre stade ? \nMr Quirin: Non, George V. C’est le même.  \nPeut-on savoir quelles sont les mesures qu’il a prises pour rénover et s’il y a eu \neffectivement des rénovations qui ont été effectuées au stade George V ? \nMr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, we have waited for ten years. I have said in my \nreply that we are going by phases and the hon. Member should follow what the answer was. \nWe are doing our best.  \nMadam Speaker: For both stadiums.  \nMr Nagalingum: For both stadiums. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, alright. Next question. \nLAND DRAINAGE MASTERPLAN – BUILDING AND LAND USE PERMITS – \nAPPLICATION PROCESSING TIME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1137",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1137,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/1137) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the Land \nDrainage Masterplan, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Land Drainage \nAuthority (LDA), information as to the number of Building and Land Use Permit applications \nreferred to the LDA by the local authorities following the publication thereof, indicating the \ntime taken for the processing thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that the Land Drainage \nMasterplan, commissioned by the Land Drainage Authority, was published on 25 August \n2025 following Cabinet approval. A technical committee was set up in February 2025 to \nreview the document. Following its recommendations, the Masterplan, together with the \nassociated maps and data sets, were published in its entirety. The digital elevation model was \nalso made accessible to the public.  \n\n54 \n \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that since the public release of the Land Drainage \nMasterplan, and up to 28 November 2025, a total of 358 Building and Land Use Permit \napplications have been referred to the Land Drainage Authority by the local authorities.  \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed that the time required to process Building and \nLand Use Permit applications depends mainly on – \n1. \nThe submission of a complete set of documents, including site plans, drawings of \nthe proposed development, the computer-aided design file in required format and \nStorm Water Drainage reports where applicable; \n2. \nThe complexity of the proposed development, and \n3. \nThe examination of Storm Water Drainage reports where warranted.  \nCurrently, the average processing time ranges from one working day to approximately \ntwo months depending on the complexity of the case and the completeness of the \nsubmissions. Incomplete submissions or the omission of required documents inevitably \ndelays the processing of applications. \nMadam Speaker, I must admit that there have been considerable delays in the \nprocessing of Building and Land Use Permit applications and I am personally not satisfied \nwith this situation. Therefore, in order to prevent undue delays in the examination of \ndocuments and the issuance of permits, a dedicated team of four officers has been constituted \nto work on backlog and expedite matters. \nMadam Speaker: Yes.  \nMs Savabaddy: Je remercie l’honorable ministre pour sa réponse. Peut-il expliquer ce \nqui sera fait pour ramener, j’ai bien compris la réponse, le long délai avant que la LDA ne \ntranche sur une application ? Merci. \nMr Gunness: Madam Speaker, as I just said, I was myself not satisfied. There was \nonly one officer working on all the documents and everything. Now, I have set up a dedicated \nteam of four officers and an Engineer is heading it. So, I am sure that we will be expediting \nmatters for the permits.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes.  \nMs Savabaddy: En ce qui concerne les demandes de permis pour des constructions qui \nse trouvent hors de la red zone du Masterplan, pourquoi dans des cas également, la LDA \n\n55 \n \nn’arrive pas à statuer et cela bloque les collectivités locales dans l’octroi du Building and \nLand Use Permit ? \nMr Gunness: All these will be things of the past.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes. You are happy now, Ms Savabaddy? \nMs Savabaddy: I am waiting for the results.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix. \nVACOAS POPULAR MULTIPURPOSE COOPERATIVES SOCIETY – \nREPRESENTATIONS – IRREGULAR SALES OF LAND",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1138",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1138,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives",
      "question": "(No. B/1138) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives whether, in regard to the Vacoas Popular \nMultipurpose Cooperatives Society, he will – \n (a)  state if he has received representations from members thereof for a meeting and, \nif so, indicate if same was acceded to;  \n(b)  for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to where matters stand with \nregard to reported cases of mismanagement over the years thereat, and  \n(c)  state whether he has taken cognizance of the communiqué issued by this Society \nfor the sale of a plot of land at Flic en Flac to the tune of Rs 560 million.",
      "answer": "Mr Ameer Meea: Madam Speaker, the Vacoas Popular Multipurpose Cooperatives \nSociety Ltd was registered in 1977 and operates as a cooperative credit union with 4591 \nactive members. Its core activities include promoting savings, issuing secured loans and \nundertaking property-related projects.  \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that the affairs of the society have been \nmanaged by a caretaker board for ten years until 13 July 2024 when a Board of Directors was \nelected democratically. The current board was constituted on 15 July 2024.  \nRegarding part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the House that I have received two \nseparate letters, both highlighting long standing issues with the Vacoas Popular Multipurpose \nCooperatives Society. The first and undated letter was received on 28 February 2025. The \nsecond, also undated and received on 23 April 2025, was addressed to the Ag. Director \nGeneral of the Financial Crimes Commission and copied to the hon. Prime Minister and \nmyself, contained serious and disturbing allegations about the society’s governance. Given \n\n56 \n \nthe gravity of these claims, I immediately instructed my officers to initiate an enquiry \nfollowing which, a comprehensive report was produced and submitted to the relevant \nauthorities.  \nConcerning part (b) of the question, I am informed that several cases of alleged \nmismanagement at the society have been referred to the police whilst others are presently \npending before courts down the years.  \nMadam Speaker, as regard to part (c), I wish to inform the House that I have taken \ncognizance of the communiqué issued on 19 November 2025 regarding the proposed R560 \nmillion sales of 27 arpents 15 perches of land at Flic en Flac. The communiqué was signed by \nthe Manager and the Treasurer whereas such a decision must be approved and issued by the \nboard through duly authorised office bearers as required under the society’s rule. The process \nwas therefore irregular from the outset.  \nMy Ministry had already issued directive before the communiqué on 18 November and \na second directive on 25 November this year instructing the society to halt the process and \nreminding it that any disposal of immovable property requires proper board \napproval/member’s authorisation at a general meeting and more importantly, a transparent \nand competitive bidding exercise, which was not followed.  \nWe further reiterated the society’s AML CFTs obligations including full customer due \ndiligence.  As the society initially failed to comply, all eight of its bank accounts across five \nbanks were placed under stricter transaction control as provided by the law with any payment \nnow subject to prior vetting by my officers.  \nMadam Speaker, on Saturday 29 November 2025, the society formally informed my \nMinistry that the proposed sale has been halted and it would fully adhere to my Ministry’s \ndirectives including conducting an open bidding exercise and submitting the selected bidder \nto a special general meeting for approval. The matter is currently being followed up by my \nMinistry.   \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Lobine, you are alright?  \nNow, hon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle! \n \n \n\n57 \n \nBOIS DES AMOURETTES-QUATRE SŒURS COASTAL ROAD – PUBLIC BEACH \nPROCLAMATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1139",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1139,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/1139) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the newly constructed \nwaterfront along the Coastal Road from Bois des Amourettes to Quatre Sœurs, he will state if \nconsideration will be given for the proclamation thereof as public beach with a view to \nentrusting same to the Beach Authority for regular maintenance, cleanliness, and \nembellishment, including the planting and upkeep of appropriate coastal vegetation and, if so, \nwhen.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Madam Speaker, all beaches along the coastal road from Bois des \nAmourettes to Quatre Sœurs have been proclaimed as public beaches. On 22 January 2025, \nthe said public beaches were vested with the Beach Authority.  \nI am informed by the Beach Authority that cleaning and maintenance of these public \nbeaches are carried out twice weekly in collaboration with Mauri-Facilities Management \nCompany Ltd. This includes the collection and removal of wastes from the beach and rock \nrevetment as well as regular grass cutting. Embellishment works are already undertaken at \nBambous Virieux, Pointes aux Feuilles and Anse Jonchee public beaches. \nFurther enhancement and the planting of additional coastal vegetation will be \nconsidered subject to clearances being obtained from the Conservator of Forests. \nThat is my answer, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Lobine! \nHIGHLANDS – INCINERATOR – OPERATIONALITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1140",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1140,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1140) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the incinerator at Highlands, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain information as to when same will become operational, \nindicating the reasons for the delay therefor.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Health and Wellness (Mr A. Bachoo): Madam Speaker, I have been \napprised that the incinerator at Highlands was repaired, commissioned and handed over to the \ncouncil on 31 July 2025 by the contractor Steam House Ltd.  \n\n58 \n \nI am further informed that the council has already initiated procedures for the obtention \nof a fire certificate. Once the fire certificate has been issued by the Mauritius Fire and Rescue \nService, the incinerator will be made operational and available to members of the public. \nMr Lobine: Madam Speaker, one supplementary question. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: You see, it is all about PQs being withdrawn. My time is consumed \nwith that. I am so sorry. \nGo ahead! \nMr Lobine: May I ask the hon. Minister – I know he is not the substantive Minister for \nthis question – do we have a timeframe as to when this fire certificate will be issued? We \nhave already visited this place on several occasions whereby we were being told that it will \nbe operational in a few days or very soon. But it is nearly four months and inhabitants over \nthere are facing serious difficulties. \nMr Bachoo: Unfortunately, the requirements of the fire services have not been met. For \nexample, they have asked for the replacement of PVC tubing used to feed the water spray \nsystem with galvanised iron or steel tubing. These have not yet been done. I hope that in the \ndays to come, this will be accomplished. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister.  \nHon. Dr. Prayag! \nRIVIERE DU REMPART SWIMMING POOL – SURVEY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1141",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1141,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/1141) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Rivière du Rempart Swimming \nPool, he will state whether a survey of the state of the facilities thereof, including the pumps, \nchanging rooms and tiers has been carried out, indicating whether consideration will be given \nfor the urgent reinstatement thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, as I had already indicated since my taking of office, \nseveral sports infrastructure all over the island are either out of use or in a bad state. The \nRivière du Rempart Swimming Pool, which is managed and maintained by the Mauritius \nSports Council since 01 July 2022, forms part of those infrastructures which are in a bad \nstate, although in a lower scale. \n\n59 \n \nI am informed by the Mauritius Sports Council that the Riviere du Rempart Swimming \nPool is operational and it is manned by some 15 persons. It is being used on average by some \n100 users on a daily basis. A recent survey and safety and health inspection have revealed that \nonly one of the three water pumps is in operation. A door was damaged in the changing room \nand a chemical which is currently stored in the pump room should be relocated outside. \nThe scope of work for the repairs of the water pump is being prepared while that of the \nconstruction of a storage facility has been finalised and tender will be launched shortly. The \ndamaged door has already been repaired. \nMadam Speaker: Okay.  \nNow, PQs B/1126, B/1142, B/1153, B/1167, and B/1169 have been withdrawn. I am \ngoing to try and follow. \nINTERTOWN GAMES – MUNICIPAL COUNCILS’ ENGAGEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1142",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1142,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1142) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Intertown Games \ncurrently being held, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain the list of the – \n(a) \nMunicipal Councils having enlisted and those not having enlisted athletes to \nparticipate therein, indicating the reasons therefor in the latter case, and \n(b) \nmeasures being envisaged to help urban authorities to make such an event more \nsuccessful.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMadam Speaker: So, I will call PQ B/1143. Hon. Dr. Prayag, I am sorry, there were \ntwo questions for you. I missed one. C’est un grand désordre ! \nCPAP MACHINES – DISTRIBUTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1143",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1143,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1143) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the 500 Continuous Positive \nAirway Pressure machines donated through the “Gift of Givers NGO”, from South Africa, in \nAugust 2022, he will state how same were distributed among the public health institutions.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that in November in 2021, \nGift of the Givers Foundation, which is the largest disaster response non-governmental \norganisation of African origin on the African continent, informed this Ministry through the \n\n60 \n \nPrime Minister’s Office that they were in the capacity to donate Continuous Positive Airway \nPressure (CPAP) machines to Mauritius. \nIt is good to note that an evaluation committee set up at the Ministry reported that the \nCPAP machine granted as CSIR L.I.F.E. was a very basic device.  \nIt was a non-invasive ventilator which was not registered with the South African Health \nProducts Regulatory Authority. It was authorised to be used only for emergency ventilation \nduring the COVID-19 pandemic, but was not appropriate for use in COVID High \nDependency Unit or COVID Intensive Care Units, but could be used in COVID wards in the \ngeneral hospitals. \nMadam Speaker, after complying with the requirement for the donation, the South \nAfrican Government’s National Development of Health was agreeable to donate 500 CPAP \nmachines to Gift of the Givers for onward donations to Mauritius.  \nThe foundation later informed that the final donation would contain 501 CPAP \nmachines and 2,500 spare circuits packed in 167 boxes. \n The Ministry was expected to cover the cost of the shipment from OR Tambo \nInternational Airport, Johannesburg, South Africa to SSR International Airport, arrange for \ncustoms clearance and bear the logistic costs for the storage, transportation and distribution of \nthe machines in public hospitals in Mauritius. \nAt the time of shipment, the agent reported that the donor informed that out of 167 \nboxes expected for donation, 14 boxes were damaged and a further two could not be sent \nsince the serial number of the machine did not match those on the packing list. Eventually, \nonly 135 boxes were shipped to Mauritius at a total coast of Rs318,449.07, excluding VAT. \nThe shipment reached Mauritius on or about 01 July 2022 and was delivered to Central \nSupply Division, Castel of the Ministry of Health and Wellness for storage and distribution. \nThe 139 boxes were verified with the procurement officer of the CSD and were reported to \ncontain a total of 415 CPAP machines with an expiry date of October 2022 instead January \n2023 as labelled on the boxes. \nMadam Speaker, 354 out of 415 CPAP were distributed among public health \ninstitutions. One was issued to the High Commissioner’s Office of the South African High \nCommission, and 16 units have been expired and are still stocked at the CSD.  \nWith your permission, Madam Speaker, a detailed distribution list is being tabled. \n\n61 \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Dr. Prayag, good?  \nNow, the Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue, hon. A. Duval! \nBIRCHAM INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY – RECOGNITION & \nACCREDITATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1144",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1144,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research",
      "question": "(No. B/1144) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research whether, in regard \nto Bircham International University (Spain), he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \nthe Higher Education Commission, information as to whether it is a recognised and \naccredited tertiary education institution in Mauritius.",
      "answer": "Dr. Sukon: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that under section 14 of the \nHigher Education Act, any institution that establishes itself in Mauritius and offers higher \neducation courses is required to be registered with the Higher Education Commission before \nit can update or advertise programmes locally. \nIn regard to Bircham International University (Spain), I am advised by HEC as follows \n– \n• \nBIU is not registered in Mauritius as a higher education institution; \n• \nIt has never submitted an application for registration to HEC;  \n• \nConsequently, it does not appear on the official register of the Higher Education \nInstitution maintained by HEC under the Act; \nConsequently, for overseas institutions that are not on the registered list established by \nHEC, HEC relies on the structured process for determining whether the qualifications may be \nrecognised. \nFirst, the Higher Education Commission checks its database of overseas universities \nand institutions whose qualifications have been evaluated and recognised previously. If the \ninstitution does not appear in the database, then HEC formally conserves the competent \nauthorities in the country where the institution claims to be established; normally, the \nNational QA Accreditation or Higher Education Authority.  In the specific case of the BIU, I \nam informed by the Higher Education Commission that it is neither registered in Mauritius \nnor is it on the existing list of overseas institutions already recognised by HEC. \n\n62 \n \nConsequently, HEC has written to the relevant Spanish Authorities to seek formal \nconfirmation of the legal status and recognition of BIU in Spain. At this point in time, the \nCommission is awaiting a written reply. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, now, we have hon. Seeburn. \nBAMBOUS VIRIEUX TO POINTE DU DIABLE – RESURFACING WORKS – \nGEOTECHNICAL/DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1145",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1145,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/1145) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose \nBelle) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the segment of the \nroad stretching from Bambous Virieux to Pointe Diable along which resurfacing works are \nongoing, he will state if any geotechnical or drainage assessment was carried out prior thereto \nand, if not, indicate whether consideration will be given for the – \n(a) \nprovision of drainage facilities thereat to prevent soil erosion and water \naccumulation, and \n(b) \nconstruction of a retaining wall or protective structure to stabilise the slope and \nsafeguard the newly resurfaced road.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, I would like to refer the hon. Member to the replies I \nmade PQ B/223 on 25 March 2025 and to PQ B/616 on 08 July 2025 wherein I informed the \nHouse that the Flacq/Mahebourg B28 Road had been severely affected following the \npipelaying works undertaken by the Central Water Authority. \nThe resurfacing works which are currently ongoing along the stretch from Bambous \nVirieux to Pointe du Diable are being carried out by CWA in accordance to the wayleave \nconditions issued by the Road Development Authority to reinstate the road after the trenching \nand excavation works. \nMadam Speaker, the South-East regions including Bambous Virieux, Anse Jonchee, \nBois des Amourettes, Vieux Grand Port, Rivère Des Créoles, Petit Bel Air and Grand Bel Air \nwere declared by the Land Drainage Authority as high-risk flood prone areas since April \n2021. \nThe study and implementation of flood mitigation measures in the region of Bambous \nVirieux were entrusted to the National Development Unit in 2021. The preliminary design \nreport for the flood mitigation measures in the Bambous Virieux region was prepared by \nServansingh Jadav & Partners Consulting Engineers Ltd and submitted to the LDA in August \n2022. \n\n63 \n \nSubsequently, geotechnical investigations were carried out along the proposed cut-off \ndrain alignment in September 2023. Based on these findings, the Consultant prepared and \nsubmitted a detailed design report which was approved by the LDA in January 2024. \nThe scope of works under the approved DDR includes the following – \n1. \nProvision of cut-off drain 1m to 2 m wide and 0.7m to 1.5m deep to intercept \nflows from the mountain slopes; \n2. \nConstruction of a new culvert and upgrading of existing culverts along B28 Road \nin Bambous Virieux region; \n3. \nRaising and the realignment of the B28 Road, and \n4. \nUpgrading of Feeder Antoine, Feeder Sookun and Rivulet Bambous. \nMadam Speaker, regarding part (a) of the question, I am informed that in view of \nextensive land acquisition requirements, the following two projects along the stretch from \nBambous Virieux to Pointe du Diable were entrusted to the Drain Infrastructure Construction \nLtd in March 2024 for implementation – \n1. \nFlood mitigation measures at Bambous Virieux, and \n2. \nFlood mitigation measures at Petit Sable and Grand Sable. \nFlood mitigation measures at Bambous Virieux – I am further informed by the DICL \nthat a first procurement exercise for Bambous Virieux project was launch on 03 September \n2024 through an open advertised bidding process. \nHowever, the exercise was not conclusive due to the high bid prices. Accordingly, the \nDICL Board recommended that the bids be relaunched at a later stage upon securing financial \nclearance for a revised cost estimate. Funds for preparation of the project has been earmarked \nunder the Climate and Sustainability Fund. The bid documents are ready. Once financial \nclearance is obtained for the revised cost estimate, the bidding exercise will be relaunched. \nAs regards the project at Petit Sable and Grand Sable, DICL issued a Work’s Order in \nNovember 2022 to Servansingh Jadav & Partners Consulting Engineers Ltd for, inter alia, \nthe preparation of the bidding document. Geotechnical investigations were subsequently \nundertaken and the findings were incorporated into the DDR which were submitted in May \n2024 together with the LDA’s clearance. \nFollowing a technical meeting in July 2024, the draft bidding document   and cost \nestimate were finalised and subsequently in October 2024. However, under the Climate and \n\n64 \n \nSustainability Fund, no funds have been earmarked in the current Financial Year 2025/2026 \nfor the implementation of the project. \nFunds have been earmarked only for the preparation of the project and as such, DICL \ncannot initiate the Land Acquisition Procedures or launch the bid during this financial year. \nMy Ministry will make arrangement for funds to be made available for implementation of the \nprojects in the next financial year. \nMadam Speaker, in parallel, the RDA has, in the pipeline, the project for the upgrading \nof the B28 Road from Ville Noire to Anse Jonchée and from Anse Jonchée to Deux Frères \nwhich makes provision for the rehabilitation and construction of drains, culverts and bridges. \nThe design for these sections had already been completed and the RDA will submit the \nappropriate budgetary proposals in due course. In addition, the RDA has already completed \nthe following – \n1. \nThe construction of four culverts and slopes stabilisation works over a length of \n200 m under the project upgrading of B28 Road from Deux Frères to Bel Air, \nphase 1; \n2. \nThe construction of four culverts and two bridges under the project flood \nmitigation measures at Anse Jonchée along B28 Road, and \n3. \nThe upgrading of existing road side drains and the construction of new drains \nunder the project upgrading of B28 Road, lot 3 from Deux Frères to Bel Air, \nphase 2. \nIn the meantime, the RDA continues to carry out regular inspection to ensure the \ncleanliness and functioning of the existing drains along B28 Road. A survey has already been \ncompleted and Work’s Orders will shortly be issued to contractors under the framework \nagreement for cleaning, desilting and minor upgrading works. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. \nYes, hon. Rookny! \nGLOBAL BUSINESS COMPANIES – PENDING APPLICATIONS – NUMBER OF \nCOMPLAINTS – RENEWAL OF DIRECTORS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1146",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1146,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/1146) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the Global \nBusiness Companies, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Financial \nServices Commission, information as to the – \n\n65 \n \n(a) \ndate of submission of the pending applications for the issue of licences \ntherefor as at 15 November 2025; \n(b) \naverage time taken to approve the appointment or renewal of directors, and \n(c) \nnumber of complaints received from management companies in respect of \nexcessive delays in – \n(i) \nprocessing licence applications, and \n(ii) \napproving the appointment of directors over the past three years.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ms Jeetun: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Financial Services Commission \nthat on average, the FSC receives around 2400 global business company’s applications \nannually. \nAs regards the date of submission of pending applications for GBCs, as at 15 \nNovember 2025, there are currently 120 applications pending; the oldest one dating back to \nApril 2023. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (b) of the question, I am informed that it is for GBC’s \nengaged in financial services activities that prior approval of the FSC is required for the \nappointment or renewal of directors. The average time taken for the approval or renewal of \ndirectors is 14 days. \nAs regards part (c) (i) of the question, the FSC has received 62 complaints over the last \ntwo years for excessive delays for processing application of GBCs and domestic companies. \nOut of these complaints, 6 concerned domestic companies and 56 concerned GBCs. \nAs regards part (c) (ii) of the question, I am informed by the FSC that as at date, no \nformal complaint has been received in respect of delays in the processing of Directors’ \nappointment or renewal. \nMadam Speaker, the delays relating to licensing issues at the FSC underscores the need \nfor continued improvement to strengthen efficiency and effectiveness. Since I took office, a \nyear ago, I have had extensive consultations with the industry stakeholders and one of the \nmost recurrent issues and problems that has come up is delays in processing of application. \nThis clearly impacts on the ease of doing business and the competitiveness of the \nMauritius International Financial Centre. This is why in the Financial Services Strategy \nReport 2025-2030, ease of doing business has been recognised as one of the five key pillars.  \nMadam Speaker, a new Chief Executive of the FSC has been appointed since \nSeptember 2025. One of the key priorities of the FSC Board and the new leadership is to \n\n66 \n \nimprove the ease of doing business. The Chief Executive of FSC also chairs the \nsubcommittee of the Financial Services Consultative Council which has just been \nreconstituted. He chairs the Ease of Doing Business subcommittee of the FSCC which \nreinforces the mandate and our drive to make improvements with regard to delays. I am also \ninformed that FSC has started implementing a series of measures, including upgrading of its \napplication forms and has embarked, since November 2025, on the testing phase of a digital \ninterface to make the process easier, clearer and more efficient. The new modes of application \ncontain enhanced features that guide applicants’ step by step, reducing mistakes and \nincomplete submissions.  \nIn conclusion, Madam Speaker, I wish to say that timely processing of application is \ncritical for the industry as we are competing globally. This is therefore a top priority for the \nFSC and we are actively working on this. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Rookny? \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, I must first of all thank the Minister for the very \nextensive reply. I would like to ask, in view of the 62 complaints received from management \ncompanies over the last two years, would she consider requesting the FSC to set up a special \ndesk to handle complaints, that is, separate from the normal processes during incorporations \nor applications? \nDr. Ms Jeetun: I totally concur with the hon. Member that we have already \ncommunicated to have a special desk and to have a line of communication with clients \nbecause very often clients are left without any communication. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Beejan! \nGOODLANDS TO COTTAGE – CONNECTING ROAD WIDENING – PAVEMENTS \n& HANDRAILS INSTALLATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1147",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1147,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1147) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the connecting road from Beau \nPlateau Road, from Goodlands to Cottage, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to whether consideration is being given for the – \n(a) \nwidening thereof, in view of the number of accidents reported thereat and \nincreasing volume of vehicles plying thereat daily and, if so, indicate the expected \nstart and completion dates thereof, and  \n\n67 \n \n(b) \ninstallation of pavements and handrails thereat, including through compulsory \nland acquisition near residential zones if deemed necessary to ensure the safety of \npedestrians.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Health and Wellness (Mr A. Bachoo): Madam Speaker, I am \ninformed that the Beau Plateau Road is not a classified road and as such, it falls under the \njurisdiction of local authorities, namely, the District Council of Rivière du Rempart. This road \nextends over a length of approximately 3.8 kilometres and its width varies between 4-6 \nmetres. \nAs regards to part (a) of the question, I am informed that the project is currently at the \nconception stage. Once all necessary clearances, including financial approval and those \nrelated to land acquisition are obtained, the project will be implemented by the District \nCouncil of Rivière du Rempart. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, enlarging the road would – as \nstated earlier – require land acquisition, construction of retaining walls, pavements and \ndrains, as well as provision for handrails, modern poles, lanterns and other associated \ninfrastructural works as rightly highlighted by the hon. Member. The District Council of \nRivière du Rempart has been requested to consult stakeholders and a technical committee is \nto be set up accordingly. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, is that alright? Okay, the hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES REGIONAL FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION – INDIAN OCEAN \nCOMPETITION – PARTICIPATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1148",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1148,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/1148) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nYouth and Sports whether, in regard to the advancement of football in our Republic and in the \nIndian Ocean, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether – \n(a) \nthe Rodrigues Regional Football Association previously participated in \ncompetitions organised by the Union des Fédérations de Football de l'Océan \nIndien and, if so, indicate the number thereof; \n(b) \nRodrigues will form part of the Fédération de Football des Iles de l’Océan Indien \nand, if not, why not, and  \n(c) \nRodrigues is included in the announced national “Plan de Relance du Football” \nand, if so, give details thereof. \n\n68",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, the Union des Fédérations de Football de l'Océan \nIndien was a regional football confederation for the Indian Ocean and operated under the \nAfrican Football Confederation. Its main function was to organise football tournaments, \nparticularly for youth categories. It comprised six member associations, namely – \n• \nMauritius; \n• \nMadagascar; \n• \nReunion Island; \n• \nComoros; \n• \nSeychelles, and \n• \nMayotte. \nMadam Speaker, the Union des Fédérations de Football de l'Océan Indien has been \ndissolved in October 2025 and a new organisation, the Union des Fédérations des Iles et \nArchipels was established on 9 November 2025 by the six-member association, namely – \n• \nMauritius; \n• \nMadagascar; \n• \nReunion; \n• \nComoros; \n• \nSeychelles, and \n• \nMayotte. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Mauritius \nFootball Association that the Rodrigues Regional Football Association was never a member \nof the Union des Fédérations de Football de l'Océan Indien. However, Rodrigues was invited \nas a special guest to participate in youth competition, namely Under 15 Boys and Girls \nTournament in 2016 and 2017 upon the proposal of the Mauritius Football Association. \nWith regard to Rodrigues forming part of the newly established Union des Fédérations \ndes Iles et Archipels, I am informed by the Mauritius Football Association that for future \ntournaments, Rodrigues will be integrated within the selection of the Republic of Mauritius, \nin line with national representation norms for future tournaments. I would like to point out \n\n69 \n \nthat the Rodrigues Regional Football Association forms part of the Mauritius Football \nAssociation, just like the other regional football associations in mainland Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (c) of the question concerning Rodrigues’ inclusion \nin the national plan de Relance du Football, I would refer the hon. Member to my reply to PQ \nB/999 at our Sitting on 11 November 2025.  \nIn accordance with the Sports Act 2016, Rodrigues is recognised as one of the 13 sport \nregions of Mauritius. Each sport region will benefit from the same programme, support and \ndevelopment initiatives under the plan and Rodrigues will therefore be fully included in all \nfuture actions to raise the level of our football to new heights across the Republic. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes hon. François. \nMr François: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I thank the hon. Member for his answer. \nMay I ask the hon. Minister whether he is aware if the new FFIOI Association adopted a new \nstatute and if he is in possession of same and can he circulate same in the interest of \nfootballers?  \nMr Nagalingum: Under the plan of Relance du Football, Madam Speaker, Rodrigues \nwill benefit from the same development measures like I said in my reply. The programme \nincludes infrastructure upgrading, technical training, youth development pathways and \nregional competition. Rodrigues will therefore receive equitable support within the national \nframework. \nMr François: Second supplementary, Madam Speaker? \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nMr François: Madame la présidente, l’honorable ministre, pour l’avancement du \nfootball, en tant qu’ancien sportif moi-même et meilleur athlète du deuxième jeux de \nRodrigues et ancien footballeur évoluant… \nMadam Speaker: Wow! \nHon. Members: Wow! \nMr François: …en première division rodriguaise comme buteur… \nMadam Speaker: Comme buteur! \nMr François: …j’aimerais bien demander à l’honorable ministre, serait-il disposé à \nmiliter ou à porter ou soutenir ou à même défendre auprès de la FIFA, un projet sportif \n\n70 \n \ninternational venant de la république de Maurice, visant à organiser la coupe du monde de \nfootball dédiée spécifiquement aux îles ou nations insulaires du monde entier ? \nMadam Speaker: Super! \nMr Nagalingum: I will take what the Member has just said into consideration. \nMadam Speaker: Very good! Yes, hon. Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and \nSouillac! \nJAWAHARLAL NEHRU & VICTORIA HOSPITALS - ANGIOGRAPHY \nEQUIPMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1149",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1149,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1149) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to angiogram \nexaminations/angiography procedure, he will state the – \n(a) \nnumber of – \n(i) \npatients having undergone same at the Jawaharlal Nehru and Queen \nVictoria (Candos) hospitals, respectively since 2020 to 2025, indicating the \nnumber thereof on the waiting list as at October 2025, and  \n(ii) \nangiography machines available therefor, and  \n(b) \nmeasures put in place to reduce waiting time therefor and facilitate same.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that previously there was no \nangiography machine at Jawaharlal Nehru hospital. It is now that the equipment is being \ninstalled and will be operational in the coming weeks. \nWith regard to part (a)(i) of the question for the period 2020 to October 2025, I am \ninformed that 10,489 angiography cases were performed at Victoria hospital. During the same \nperiod, 1,026 patients from Jawaharlal Nehru hospital requiring angiography procedures have \nbeen referred to other hospitals. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to waiting lists, I am also informed that as at October \n2025, there were 46 patients on the waiting list at Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital, whose waiting \ntime is of approximately three weeks; and at Victoria Hospital, there were 380 patients on the \nwaiting list with a waiting time of 11 weeks. \n\n71 \n \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (a) (ii) of the question, there are currently five \nangiography machines that are available in public hospitals with one installed at Dr. Jeetoo \nHospital, two at Cardiac Trust Fund for Specialised Medical Care, SSR National Hospital, \nPamplemousses and two at Victoria Hospital. In addition, the angiography machine, which \nwas left unutilised at Dr. Jeetoo Hospital, has been transferred to Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital.  \nMoreover, with the setting up of Cath-lab services at Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital and \nSAJ Hospital, the number of angiography procedures will definitely reduce the waiting time, \nthus relieving the suffering of our patients. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, my Ministry is resorting to \nextra sessions after normal working hours to curb down the waiting time for angiography \nprocedures. In the meantime, training is being provided to paramedical staff in order to \nenable them to provide adequate angiography services. \nMadam Speaker, the House may wish to note that there has not been any action to \nprovide angiography services at Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital for the past seeming years despite \nthe fact that there was a Minister of Health from this particular region. Nothing was done to \nalleviate the suffering of the people in the southern part, and patients had to be referred to \nother hospitals. Adding insult to injury, our angiography machines donated by the \nGovernment of Japan were left idle at Dr. Jeetoo for nearly 6 months and was eventually \ntransferred to Cardiac Trust Fund SSR National Hospital, Pamplemousses. It is regretful that \nthis machine could have been transferred to Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital, where optimum life-\nsaving intervention could have been made to relief the inhabitants of the southern region.  \nIn the meantime, training is also being provided to medical and paramedical staff to use \nthe angiography machine at Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital. I wish to inform the House that one \nangiography will be installed at Flacq Hospital in 2026. The procurement procedures have \nalready been initiated for the acquisition of this equipment which will provide a proximity \nservice to patients in the eastern region. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Madam! \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Would the hon. Minister consider \nthe implementation of setting up of a formal framework with a view to developing and using \nan evidence-based system based on the clinical needs and urgency of patients? \n\n72 \n \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, all these things are being looked into. I can even now \nannounce that by next year, the Rose Belle Hospital will have additional departments, \nincluding one Renal Department which is being provided by the Government of India. Apart \nfrom this, there will also be other surgical operations which will be conducted, including lung \nsurgery. \nMadam Speaker: Lung surgery! Lung, yes! Okay, you are alright?  \nHon. Seeburn! \nBOIS DES AMOURETTES – FOOTBALL PITCH – DISCREPANCIES & \nREMEDIAL WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1150",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1150,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1150) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose \nBelle) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the renovation of the \nfootball pitch at Bois-des-Amourettes, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to whether a technical assessment has been carried out to verify compliance \nwith the initial project specifications and standards, indicating if discrepancies have been \nobserved and, if so, indicate – \n(a) \nwhether – \n(i) \nthe contractor will be required to carry out remedial works, and  \n(ii) \nactions will be taken against anyone having condoned same, and  \n(b) \nexpected date of coming into operation of the said football pitch.",
      "answer": "The Minister of National Infrastructure (Mr G. Gunness): Madam Speaker, I am \ninformed that the National Development Unit proceeded with the upgrading of the Bois des \nAmourettes football ground in two phases as follows – \n• \nPhase 1 – upgrading of the Bois des Amourettes football ground which comprised \nthe returfing of the whole pitch, and  \n• \nPhase 2 – upgrading of the frontage fencing of the Bois des Amourettes football \nground. \n\n73 \n \nMadam Speaker, for Phase 1, the contract was allocated to Sotravic Ltd on 17 February \n2023 for an amount of Rs6,715,349.80 by the NDU under its framework agreement for \namenities. The scope of works included the following – \n• \nexcavation of 700 m3 of existing topsoil; \n• \nprovision of 1050 m3 of imported fill for returfing works; \n• \nsupply of 600 m3 of vegetable topsoil; \n• \nprovision of 135 m of French drains around the area of the football pitch; \n• \nsupply and placing of 2,125 m3 of spoils of size 200 x 300 mm in size; \n• \nfelling of four trees, and  \n• \nsupply and planting of grass chiendent of an extent of 4,250 m2. \nMadam Speaker, as regards to Phase 2 of the project, the NDU awarded a second \ncontract to Sotravic Ltd on 13 January 2024 for an amount of Rs4,113,109.55 under its \nframework agreement for amenities. The scope of works concern – \n• \nthe upgrading of the frontage fencing which consisted of demolition of existing \nblock wall over a length of 84 m; \n• \nexcavation and laying of blinding concrete; \n• \nconstruction of a new one-metre-high block wall fencing with 4.5-metre-high \ngalvanised metal fencing over a length of 84 m; \n• \nremedial works to damaged turfing of football ground, and \n• \nprovision of a new main gate, 4 metre wide and one pedestrian gate. \nMadam Speaker, the final handing over exercise to the District Council of Grand Port \nfor Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the project was carried out on 16 January 2025. I am informed that \nsnags were identified during the handing over exercise. The discrepancies identified were – \n• \nlevelling of the topsoil; \n• \npresence of pebbles, and  \n• \nmaintenance of grass turfing which were not to adequate length. \n\n74 \n \nMadam Speaker, follow-up was done through monthly site visits by the NDU and the \ncontractor Sotravic Ltd to review the status of the remedial works. On 21 October 2025, the \nfinal handing over was carried out successfully after all remedial works were cleared by the \ncontractor, and the site was taken over by the District Council of Grand Port. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that during a site visit carried out by the three \nMPs of the constituency, together with representatives of the District Council of Grand Port \nand the contractor on 19 November 2025, it was observed that the football ground was \nuneven and there was presence of pebbles on the pitch. \nMadam Speaker, I have also been informed that during the Régate Festival held from \n29-31 August 2025, the football pitch was used to park vehicles, which I understand damaged \nthe playground. I would here seize this opportunity to inform the House that henceforth, \nfootball grounds would not be used as parking space but only for the specific purpose for \nwhich it is meant for.  \nMadam Speaker, being given that the football ground is now contractually under the \nresponsibility of the District Council of Grand Port, the latter has been requested to carry out \nthe remedial works. \nMadam Speaker, as for part (b) of the question, the football pitch will be operational \nonce all remedial works are completed by the District Council and the ground certified fit for \nuse. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Dr. Ms Daureeawo! \nMAURITIUS – REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION JURISDICTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1151",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1151,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/1151) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Attorney General whether, in regard to international arbitration, he will \nstate the measures being envisaged to propel Mauritius as a reliable, suitable and efficient \ninternational arbitration jurisdiction/hub in the Africa region.",
      "answer": "Mr Glover: Madam Speaker, let me at the outset state that when we look at the \nevolution of reputable international arbitration centres worldwide, there has been no magical \nwand employed to propel them to the place of respect that they currently enjoy. The current \nstatus has been the result of enduring, consistent and incremental strategies developed and \nadapted over the years.  \n\n75 \n \nI have to say that governments hosting reputable international arbitration centres have \nbeen very careful in giving support to these centres to avoid a direct interventionist approach \nthat runs counter to the very spirit of neutral independent resolution of disputes. In these \nsuccessful ventures, governments have been mere catalysts, leveraging on the invaluable \ninput of their private sector.  \nThe examples I have in mind are the Singapore International Arbitration Centre and the \nHong Kong International Arbitration Centre. The Hong Kong one was established in 1985 \nand the Singapore one in 1991, and it took both of them a number of years to flourish into the \nrespected arbitration centres that they now are. \nIn Mauritius, we started our international arbitration venture in or about 2008 with the \nenactment of the International Arbitration Act based on the UNCITRAL Model Law. This \nwas followed by the establishment in Mauritius in September 2010 of the first Office of the \nPermanent Court of Arbitration outside the Hague, with the Secretary General of the PCA \nhaving the functions of appointing authority for the Arbitral Tribunal. \nSubsequently, the Mauritius International Arbitration Centre (MIAC) was set up in \n2011 as a fully-owned government company and operated as a joint venture with the London \nCourt of International Arbitration until 2018. I am informed that towards the quarter of 2018, \nMIAC continued its operation with support from the PCA under a management agreement.  \nIn 2019, MIAC and PCA originally housed in Ebène, migrated to new premises in \nCaudan with State-of-the-Art Arbitration Suite and of international standard. I am informed \nthat MIAC and the Mauritius Office of the PCA have been involved in increasing the \nvisibility of Mauritius as an international arbitration jurisdiction by participation in various \ninternational arbitration events. \nI am also informed that MIAC has signed numerous cooperation agreements with \nprominent international arbitration institutions including the international centre for \nsettlement of investment disputes. I am further informed that the PCA continues to administer \nan increasing number of cases through its Mauritius office and that this year marks the 15th \nanniversary of its establishment in Port Louis; a milestone celebrated with the participation of \nthe hon. Prime Minister, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, myself, members of the Judiciary \nand the Bar Council. The presence of the Secretary General of the PCA on this occasion, \ntestifies to the importance attached by the PCA to its partnership with Mauritius. \n\n76 \n \nThe years post 2016, Madam Speaker, also saw a transformation in the structure of the \nMCCI Mediation and Arbitration Centre, commonly known as MARC with increased \nemphasis on international arbitration. I am informed that MARC also has hearing facilities of \nhigh international standard.  \nMoreover, as announced by the hon. Prime Minister, government is presently working \nwith the Mauritius Chamber of Commerce and Industry towards the consolidation of \nalternative dispute resolution services in Mauritius through the respective merger of MIAC \nand MARC. I have not later than yesterday, Madam Speaker, engaged with the MCCI to push \nthrough this matter so that it becomes reality in the next few months. \nMadam Speaker, in parallel with these institutional developments, sustained efforts \nhave also been made to build domestic capacity in international arbitration. I am informed \nthat the PCA Mauritius Fellowship Programme, in place since September 2016, provides for \nthe annual employment of young Mauritian lawyer at the Permanent Court of Arbitration for \none year; thereby contributing to the development of local expertise.  \nFurthermore, various trainings, lectures, conferences and other knowledge sharing \ninitiatives are regularly undertaken by the PCA, MIAC and several Mauritian organisations \ninvolved in dispute resolution. These capacity building measures strengthen the local \narbitration ecosystem and contributed to Mauritius being consistently regarded as a safe seat \nfor arbitration as reflected in reputable international assessment such as the Delos Guide to \nArbitration Places. \nIn fine, Madam Speaker, Mauritius has, over the years, developed all the necessary \nbases to be a reliable, suitable and efficient international arbitration jurisdiction, starting with \nthe law base UNCITRAL Model Law, then with credible arbitration institutions with \nrecognisable rules of international standard and finally, with state-of-the-art hearing facilities.  \nFinally, making Mauritius a beacon for international arbitration does not boil down to \ninventing new measures but to first rationalising and capitalising on what we already have. \nGovernment fully realises the potential that exists in international arbitration and is, without \nbeing unduly interventionist, determined to explore and facilitate the creation of appropriate \nchannels to leverage on the goodwill we have already acquired in the field of international \narbitration; but this has to be done in, as I said before, an incremental fashion whilst giving \nfull and careful consideration to the needs of the moment. \n\n77 \n \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Member. \nHon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes! \nL’OISEAU DU PARADIS SHELTER – ACCOMODATION CAPACITY – \nREDEPLOYED STAFF",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1152",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1152,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/1152) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to L’Oiseau du \nParadis Shelter, she will state – \n(a)  the number of – \n(i)  \nchildren that can be accommodated thereat currently, and  \n(ii) \nstaff members deployed thereat, and  \n(b)  whether it is operating in full compliance with safety and regulatory standards \nand, if not, indicate the reasons therefor.",
      "answer": "Ms Navarre-Marie: Madam Speaker, I wish to draw the attention of the hon. Member \nthat L’Oiseau du Paradis Shelter has been closed down since 5th  June 2025, following an \nincident which occurred on 01st June 2025 when three minors absconded. A rapid drug test \nwas conducted on the minors which revealed positive results for cannabis in two children \nwhile the third child was tested negative.  \nAs regards part (a) (i) of the question, the Residential Care Institution (RCI) can \naccommodate a maximum of 30 boys aged between 5 and 17 years old. \nRegarding part (a) (ii) of the question, 33 care givers, 2 general workers, 3 cleaners and \n2 cooks employed by the National Children’s Council have been redeployed to Cap L’Espoir \nin Cap Malheureux as from 01 December 2025, that is, yesterday. \nIn addition, a Shelter Manager has been appointed by the Board of the National \nChildren’s Council and will take office as from tomorrow.  \nAs for part (b) of the question, it is envisaged that the Residential Care Institution of \nCap Malheureux will resume operation as from 04 December 2025 and my Ministry will \nensure that the RCI adheres to all safety and regulatory standards of the RCI for Children \nRegulations 2022. \n\n78 \n \nMy Ministry has a dedicated team of enforcement officers who will conduct regular \nvisits at the RCI to ensure that it is fully compliant with the safety and regulatory standards.  \nMadam Speaker, the shelter is currently undergoing renovation works comprising – \npainting, installation of burglar proofing to openings, replacement of ceramic tiles among \nothers, following a tender exercise. Works started on 15 November 2025 and will be \ncompleted by Wednesday 03 December 2025. \nI wish to inform the House that yesterday all staff turned up except 6 who were on \nvacation and casual leave. I also wish to point out that the Child Care Givers have been \nprovided with training on Child Psychology and on legal matters in November 2025 by senior \nofficers of my Ministry in collaboration with ‘Pedostop’, a registered NGO. Continuous \ntraining will be dispensed to the staff working at the shelter, to equip them with the required \nskills in carrying out their duties. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! Allez-y! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Je remercie la ministre pour sa \nréponse. On comprend qu’un maximum de 30 enfants seront placés dans cet abri sous la \nresponsabilité du même personnel qui l’a rendu tristement célèbre. La ministre peut-elle \ninformer la Chambre si c’est ainsi qu’elle entend professionnaliser cet abri et donner \nl’assurance que les mêmes dérives ne se reproduiront pas ? Merci, Madame la présidente. \nMs Navarre-Marie : Madame la présidente, j’ai répondu que les Care Givers ont eu la \nformation nécessaire pendant le mois de novembre de par nos officiers du ministère et l’ONG \nPedostop. J’ai rencontré les Care Givers personnellement. Ils m’ont assuré que leur mindset a \nchangé. Donc je compte sur eux. Toujours est-il, Madame la présidente, qu’il y a 25 employés \nqui ont été suspendus de juillet 2018 à ce jour. Donc, nous comptons recruter ces personnes-\nlà au fur et à mesure… \nMadam Speaker: D’autres personnes ! Vous voulez recruter d’autres personnes ? \nMs Navarre-Marie : Non, on va, allons dire, réintégrer ces personnes suspendues. The \ncase will be taken on a case-to-case basis by the Board of the National Children’s Council \nafter all charges have been cleared against these persons. \nMadam Speaker: Deuxième question ? \n\n79 \n \nMs Anquetil: Oui. Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Pour éviter les dérives du \npassé, la ministre peut-elle indiquer à la Chambre si elle considère que deux demi-journées de \nformation en psychologie et une journée sur les droits des enfants en six mois de fermeture, \nsuffisent à redresser un abri pour sa gestion chronique défaillante ? Je vous remercie, \nMadame la présidente. \nMs Navarre-Marie : Certainement pas, Madame la présidente. C’est pourquoi dans ma \ndernière phrase à la question, j’ai dit continuous training will be dispensed for to the staff \nworking at the shelter. Donc, la formation sera continue. \nMadam Speaker: Oui, madame Savabaddy. \nMs Savabaddy: Merci, Madame la présidente. Est-ce que la ministre peut nous dire \nquelle garantie nous avons que leur mindset vont changer ? Merci. \nMs Navarre-Marie : Je n’ai aucune garantie, Madame.  \nMadam Speaker: Vous avez encore une question ? \nMs Anquetil : En fait, j’ai encore deux questions. Je ne sais pas si vous allez me \npermettre.  \nMadam Speaker: C’est un sujet tellement important. Je vais vous permettre.  \nMs Anquetil : Vous savez, Madame la présidente, ces enfants ne méritent pas \nl’indifférence. Ils méritent dignité, sécurité et …  \nMadam Speaker: Pas des commentaires. Question ! \nMs Anquetil : C’est pour ça que j’ai dit si vous me permettez.  \nAlors, la ministre peut-elle expliquer pourquoi le problème d’égout situé dans la cour \nde l’établissement, à proximité de la cuisine et qui nécessite l’intervention des camions D. \nSeeven pour le pompage des toilettes toutes les deux semaines, persiste et si un tel \nmanquement est compatible avec les normes de santé et de sécurité applicable aux enfants en \naccueil résidentiel ? \nJe vous remercie, Madame la présidente.   \nMs Navarre-Marie: Madame la présidente, j’ai répondu et j’ai dit dans ma réponse \nqu’il y a des works which are going on et tout sera réglé dans les meilleurs délais.   \nMadam Speaker: Dernière. \n\n80 \n \nMs Anquetil : C’est vraiment une dernière.  \nAlors, vous savez, Madame la présidente, sous l’ancien régime, ma demande de visiter \nL’Oiseau du Paradis par un groupe de parlementaires de deux côtés de la Chambre, avait été \nrefusée. La ministre peut-elle indiquer si cette fois ci, elle accordera l’accès à l’abri à un petit \ngroupe de parlementaires de deux côtés de la Chambre ? Je vous remercie, Madame la \nprésidente.  \nMs Navarre-Marie : Certainement, Madame la présidente.  \nMadam Speaker: Très bien. Monsieur Rookny, vous aviez une question ? J’ai cru voir \nvotre main. C’était pour dire bonjour.  \nTrès bien, l’Oiseau du Paradis. Espérons que ce sera le paradis, Madame la ministre.  \nMs Navarre-Marie : On garde l’espoir, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Maintenant, nous avons Monsieur Rookny. C’était pour ça ! \nBLACK RIVER DISTRICT – OPERATIONAL MARKETS – NEW MARKET \nCONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1153",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1153,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1153) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Black River District, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) the number of markets in operation thereat, if any, and \n(b) whether consideration will be given for the – \n(i) \nconstruction of a new market on the west coast and issue permits in relation \nthereto, and \n(ii) \nsearch for a private partnership to start the operation of a temporary market \non Saturdays or Sundays thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFORTHCOMING FESTIVE SEASON – LIVESTOCK AVAILABILITY – PRICE \nSTABILISATION MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1154",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1154,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/1154) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \n\n81 \n \nregard to meat for the forthcoming festive season, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to – \n (a)   the expected availability and volume of livestock for local consumption, \nindicating the volume of livestock available from local farming compared to \nimported livestock therefor; \n(b)  the measures being taken to ensure stable and affordable prices, and \n(c) \nwhether any risk of price escalation or supply shortage have been identified.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Education and Human Resources (Dr. M. Gungapersad): Madam \nSpeaker, allow me to reply to this PQ on behalf of the substantive Minister Agro-Industry, \nFood Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries. \nThe Division of Veterinary Services of my Ministry issues permit for import of frozen, \nchilled, ambient and dry meat products from several countries including Australia, New \nZealand, France, Ireland, South Africa and India.  \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the House that for the last \nquarter of 2024, around 2300 goats, 2650 sheep and 1181 cattle were imported from South \nAfrica. For the last quarter of this year, the Division of Veterinary Services has already issued \nimport permit to Socovia Belle Vue Ltd for importation of 3000 goats, 3000 sheep and 994 \ncattle from South Africa. 649 cattle reached on 21 November 2025 while 3000 goats, 3000 \nsheep and 345 cattle are expected to land on 03 December 2025. The Commission of \nAgriculture, Rodrigues Regional Assembly, has informed my Ministry that a quota of 1150 \nLivestock, including 800 goats and sheep, will be made available for the final quarter of \n2025. Furthermore, I am informed by the Food and Agricultural Research and Extension \nInstitute that around 4500 goats and 100 sheep are estimated to be potentially available from \nlocal farmers in December 2025. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that \nI have received the assurance that there will be no substantial increase in the price of cattle, \ngoat and sheep during the forthcoming festive season. Furthermore, my Ministry will set up a \nmonitoring committee with the representatives of the Ministry of Commerce and Consumer \nProtection, the Mauritius Meat Authority, the importers and the Association of Butchers with \na view to ensuring that the price of meat remains stable and affordable for the festive season. \n\n82 \n \nAs regards part (c) of the question, in line with the decision taken by government on 24 \nOctober 2025, to have recourse to 100% non-structural protein ELISA test and 10% solid \nfees competition ELISA test on livestock imported from South Africa due to the foot and \nmouth disease, it is expected that the additional testing cost incurred by the importer will be \nabsorbed in the overall pricing structure resulting in no significant increase in retail price and \nno disruption in the supply of meat. \nMadam Speaker, in addition with the number of livestock being imported, the quota \nsubmitted by Rodrigues Regional Assembly and the availability on the local farms, it is \nexpected that there will be no shortage of meat during the festive season. \nThank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Mr Rookny, you are okay?  \nNow, we have the Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d'Or.  \nSUMMER SEASON – INCREASING ELECTRICITY DEMAND – PROFIT \nCEILING IMPOSITION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1155",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1155,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/1155) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the impending \nincrease in demand for electricity during the peak summer season, he will state if his Ministry \nwill consider imposing a profit ceiling on solar system kits aiming at encouraging investment \ntherein thus reducing reliance on the national grid.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGOODLANDS – EX-AREA HEALTH CENTRE – ESTABLISHMENT OF SUB-\nHEALTH OFFICE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1156",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1156,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1156) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the  Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Ex-Area Health Centre \nlocated at Goodlands, he will state if consideration is being given for its establishment as a \nsub-health office to facilitate residents of Goodlands, Roche Terre, Grand Gaube and Petit \nRaffray, among others, in obtaining documents such as cremation and burial papers, food \nhandlers' certificates and others.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, the building in question does not fall under the \nresponsibility of my Ministry. I am fully aware of the difficulties faced by the inhabitants of \n\n83 \n \nGoodlands, Roche Terre, Grand Gaube and Petit Raffray and surrounding areas who \ncurrently have to travel to Rivère du Rempart to obtain cremation and burial permits.  \nI wish to inform the House that the Prime Minister’s Office, the Ministry of Local \nGovernment and my Ministry will look into providing a Single Point Office in Goodlands for \nthe issue of burial and cremations permits. \nMadam Speaker: The Table has been advised that the following PQs have been \nwithdrawn: B/1157, B/1159, B/1160, B/1164, B/1166, B/1171, B/1173. \nI am saying, once again, we must find a better solution to this. It gets very confusing \nafter a while.  \nOkay, let us go on. If I make a mistake, you just tell me.  \nDr. Ms Daureeawo, again.  \nPUBLIC HOSPITALS – PARKING SPACES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1157",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1157,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1157) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to parking spaces at \npublic hospitals, he will state –  \n(a) \nthe number thereof available at each hospital, indicating the number assigned for \npublic use, and  \n(b)  if he has been made aware of shortages thereof, indicating the measures taken to \naddress same.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCHÂTEAU BÉNARÈS – RESTORATION WORKS - FUNDS EARMARKED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1158",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1158,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/1158) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the national heritage \nsite of Château Bénarès, he will state whether a site visit been carried out thereat by Officers \nof his Ministry to examine the current state of the building and, if so, whether funds have \nbeen earmarked for the restoration thereof, indicating the – \n (a) the scope of works; \n (b) contractor to whom, if any, works have been entrusted, and  \n(c) \nexpected start and completion dates thereof. \n\n84",
      "answer": "Mr Gondeea: Madam Speaker, Château Bénarès, located in the district of Savanne, \nwas designated as a national heritage site on 06 May 2022 in view of its historical \nsignificance. Although it is a national heritage, it is vested in the District Council of Savanne \nand any restoration works have to be undertaken by the latter organisation under the \nsupervision and technical guidance of the National Heritage Fund.  \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that officers of my Ministry and the National Heritage \nFund have carried out several site visits in the past during which, advice was duly provided to \nthe District Council of Savanne. Since 2023, an architect and an engineer employed by my \nMinistry under the expert skills programme, have been conducting surveys thereat and a \npreliminary report together with recommendations to, inter alia, recruit specialists with \nexperience in the restoration of heritage building, were made. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that in view of the prevailing \neconomic situation, the project has been placed in abeyance by the District Council of \nSavanne.  \nWith regard to part (b) and (c) of the question, I am informed that since the project has \nbeen put in abeyance, no contractor has been appointed. As such, no start and no completion \ndates have been set up.  \nThank you.   \nMadam Speaker: Yes, you are, okay? \nHon. Lobine, First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix.  \nCHALINE STREET, SOUILLAC – 07 NOVEMBER 2023 TORRENTIAL RAIN \n– DAMAGED BRIDGE – RECONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1159",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1159,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1159) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the bridge damaged \nfollowing the torrential rains on 7 November 2023 at Chaline street in Souillac, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the District Council of Savanne, information as to \nwhere matters stand as to the reconstruction thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n\n85 \n \nRIVIÈRE DU REMPART DISTRICT COUNCIL – MISSING STREETLIGHTS \n– INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1160",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1160,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1160) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the recent allegations of missing \nstreetlights worth over 3 million rupees from the Rivière du Rempart District Council, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether an inquiry has been \ninitiated thereinto and, if so, where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCNT CREDIT UNION – UNPAID DIVIDENDS & GOVERNANCE ISSUES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1161",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1161,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives",
      "question": "(No. B/1161) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives whether, in regard to the CNT Credit Union, he \nwill state – \n(a) \nif he has been made aware that since 2022 over 1000 members thereof have not \nbeen paid dividends due by the Union, and \n(b) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to why the caretaker \ncommittee thereof has not been replaced, indicating the actions being envisaged \nto safeguard the interests of those workers.",
      "answer": "Mr Ameer Meea: Madam Speaker, concerning part (a) of the question, I am informed \nby the Registrar of Cooperative Societies that since 2018, the National Transport Corporation \nEmployees Co-operative Credit Union Ltd. has undertaken a restructuring of its capital to \nadapt to changing economic conditions. To that effect, members share capital was transferred \nto a deposit account while a minimum share of Rs100 was maintained for each member. \nSince then, payouts to members have been in the form of interest on deposits instead of \ndividends on shares. It has been reported that at the annual general meeting of the National \nTransport Corporation Employees Co-operative Credit Union Ltd., held on 12 July 2025, the \nassembly unanimously approved the payments of interest on deposits for the years 2022, \n2023, 2024 as follows – \n• \nFor year 2022, on a deposit of Rs30,912,986, interests of Rs1,174,693 to be \npaid at the rate of 3.8%; \n• \nFor the year 2023, an amount of Rs614,789 to be paid as interests to the rate of \n2% on a deposit of Rs30,739,448, and \n\n86 \n \n• \nAn amount of Rs787,246 to paid as interest for the year 2024 at the rate of \n2.45% of a deposit of Rs31,489,859. \n• \nAn amount of Rs1,339,322 was credited to members individual bank accounts, \nand  \n• \nRs1,237,407 were transferred to member’s deposit accounts as per their wish. \nMadam Speaker, as regards to part (b) of the question, I am informed that a petition was \nreceived from the members of National Transport Corporation Employees Co-Operative \nCredit Union Ltd. requesting the removal of the caretaker board and to proceed with \ndemocratic election of members. \nAccordingly, my Ministry had approved the removal of the caretaker board on 19 \nAugust 2025 and has authorised the society to proceed with the election of a democratically \nelected board in accordance with Section 41(3)(d) of the Co-Operative Act 2016. \nConcurrently, my Ministry sought the advice of the State Law Office on the eligibility of \nmembers of the society who were previously in the elected board as to whether they could \nstand for re-election. \nThe Solicitor General has, in a letter dated 14 November 2025, highlighted in two \nreports from my Ministry dated 11 December 2015 and 28 July 2025, respectively, that it was \nobserved that funds have been misused and mismanaged. The Solicitor General has thus \nadvised that pursuant to Section 48(g) of the Co-Operatives Act 2016, all members of the \nprevious board who were subject to reports would not be qualified to stand as candidates for \nthe post of director in the upcoming election. \nMadam Speaker, the society has recently been informed of the advice of the Solicitor \nGeneral about the ineligibility of members who were reported for misuse and \nmismanagement of funds to stand as candidates for the forthcoming elections. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, thank you.  \nHon. First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nPUBLIC & PRIVATE HEALTH INSTITUTIONS – CAESAREAN SECTION \nPREVALENCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1162",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1162,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1162) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to women giving birth \n\n87 \n \nthrough Caesarean Section (CS), he will state the prevalence thereof in Mauritius, indicating \nthe – \n(a) \nage range concerned therewith and the ratio of birth by CS in both public and \nprivate health institutions, and \n(b) \nmeasures his Ministry proposes to take to address the issue along the \nrecommendations of the World Health Organisation.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: I wish to inform the House that statistics show that there has been an \nincrease in the percentage of c-section carried out in both public and private health \ninstitutions from 46.3% in 2015 to 61.4% in 2024. I am also informed that the age 20 to 34 \nyears have recourse to c-section, and it is following the same trend during the last five years. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, according to latest figures of 2024, out of 8,052 \ntotal births in public hospitals, the ratio of normal delivery to c-section is almost one to one \n(1:1) whereas in private health institutions, for 2024, out 4,103 total births, the ratio of \nnormal delivery to c-section is one to two (1:2).  \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, in line with World Health \nOrganisation’s recommendations, my Ministry is implementing several measures to reduce \nthe need to carry out c-section deliveries, amongst others – \n(i) \nPre-conception care and counselling is conducted regularly by Community \nHealth Care Officers in the community; \n(ii) \nWomen are encouraged to plan and space their pregnancies through the use of \ncontraceptives provided free of charge in family planning clinics; \n(iii) \nAntenatal care is provided as early as possible in primary health centres and \ninclude one to one and group counselling, echography’s and vitamins and iron \nsupplementation; \n(iv) \nHigh risk cases and teenage pregnancies are referred to regional hospitals for \nspecialised follow-up by obstetricians; \n(v) \nLabour wards are fully equipped to ensure cardiotocographic monitoring of \nlabour and foetal heart rate to prevent complication during labour; \n(vi) \nDecisions to conduct a caesarean section are based on clear indication; \n\n88 \n \n(vii) \nOther measures include capacity building of health professionals involved in \nmaternal and child health based on updated on national obstetrics protocols. \nMadam Speaker, through these measures the Ministry remains committed to ensuring \nthat every caesarean section is performed for the right reasons, at the right time and in the \nright setting, thereby aligning national practices with international best standards. Caesarean \nsection is absolutely critical to save lives in situation where deliveries would pose a risk such \nas malformation of foetus, hypertension in pregnancy, maternal complication, gestational \ndiabetes mellitus, foetal distress or due to baby’s malpresentations. \nAccording to new research from World Health Organisation, birth by caesarean section \ncontinue to rise globally, now accounting to more than one in five, that is, 21% of all child \nbirths. This number is set to continue increasing over the coming decade with nearly a third \nor 29% of all births likely to take place by caesarean section by 2030.  \nMauritius is also following the same international trend regarding the increase in \ncaesarean section deliveries. There are so many other reasons accounting for the increased \nnumber of caesarean section deliveries.  \nTo name a few – \n(i) \nIncreasing maternal age and numbers of multiple births; \n(ii) \nHigher rates of obesity among women; \n(iii) \nA lot of previous caesareans pregnant ladies required to be sectioned, and \n(iv) \nIncreased number of sexually transmitted diseases. \nMy Ministry is also proposing to take the following additional measures to address the \nissue of increasing caesarean rate – \n(i) \nClinical audit and monitoring to assess whether indications are being \nundertaken in public hospitals to ensure medical justification and adherence to \nWHO guidelines; \n(ii) \nUpdating and standardising national protocol to emphasise evidence-based \nmanagement of labour and delivery, including use of WHO Robson \nclassification system, to monitor and compare CS rates between facilities; \n\n89 \n \n(iii) \nOrganisation of continuous medical education and refresher courses for \nobstetricians, midwives and labour ward staff to strengthen decision-making \nduring labour management and promote safe, normal deliveries where feasible; \n(iv) \nStrengthen antenatal counselling on normal delivery, and \n(v) \nPublic education campaigns to highlight that vaginal delivery remains the safest \noptions where no medical contradictions exist. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMs Savabaddy: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Minister inform the House \nwhether any study has been carried out on how Mauritius is affected as compared to other \ncountries in the SADC region? Thank you. \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I do not have any information regarding such type of \nstudies which have carried out. Of course, as I have already mentioned, this is the \ninternational trend. I do hope that with the measures that we have taken, we can put – I do not \nsay an end –, but rather a break to this system which is, in fact, not normal. \nMs Savabaddy: Thank you, Madam Speaker. My second question is: why is it that the \ncost of CS in public institutions is less than those performed by private institutions? Has this \nalso been looked into, hon. Minister? \nMadam Speaker: Sorry, I missed the last part. Are you saying there are more in public \nhospitals? \nMs Savabaddy: No. \nMadam Speaker: No. It is the contrary? \nMs Savabaddy: Yes. \nMadam Speaker: But it is still a lot? Yes! \nMr Bachoo:  If you compare public hospitals with private hospitals, you find in public \nhospitals, it is less. The number of caesareans is less than in private hospitals. Probably, all \nprosperous people go in private hospitals.  \nMadam Speaker: So, it is a question of money? \nMr Bachoo:  Maybe they want to get the best way out. That may be one of the reasons. \nMadam Speaker: Do not say that, hon. Minister! The best way out? Do not say that! \n\n90 \n \nMr Bachoo: I am not an expert in that field, but I mean to say, I get the feeling that \nthey want the easiest way instead of going through pain and all. \nMadam Speaker: On appelle ça la facilité. Let us finish. \nMs Savabaddy: My last question. Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Minister \nprovide us some statistics? Thank you. \nMr Bachoo: Of course, I am going to provide the detailed statistics. \nMadam Speaker: Please lay it on the Table. \nMr Bachoo: I will lay it on the Table. \nMadam Speaker: It is such an important issue, and you know that it is dear to my \nheart.  \nYes, hon. Dr. Prayag! \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Thank you, hon. Minister. While providing \nthe statistics, I think it would be more informative if we could have been provided the \nstatistics of elective normal deliveries and elective caesarean section as compared to public \nand private institutions. Separately, the comparison of emergency vaginal deliveries and c-\nsections in public and private institutions. Then, we might be able to really compare how \nmany insurance companies come into the game here. \nMr Bachoo: I know you are interested in the subject. I am going to provide you a \nbulky document on this. All the details will be provided. I will take some time. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you so much, hon. Minister. Yes! \nMr François: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister if he has the \ninformation or the statistics about caesarean sections prevalence in Rodrigues? What is the \nactual situation thereat, if any? \nMadam Speaker: Surement, c’est plus naturel là-bas. \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I expected a question from Rodrigues. For the period of \n2020-2025, the last five years, out of 4,929 births in Rodrigues, 1,938 babies were delivered \nby CS which corresponds to most 39.3% of the overall births. \n\n91 \n \nStatistics indicate that over the past 5 years, there is an increase in the number of CS \nperformed. In 2020, it was 38.1%. Now, it is 43.3% for 2025.  So, even Rodrigues needs \nsome special attention. \nMadam Speaker: En français, on dit la naissance par le bas. On a appris cela \nrécemment. \nIt seems that seems that I have more questions that have been withdrawn: B/1165 and \nB/1168.  \nNow, time is over! Thank you very much, hon. Minister and everybody. \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that all the business on \ntoday’s Order Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10. \nMr Gunness rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nPUBLIC BILLS \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill (No. XXX of 2025) \nwas read a first time.  \nSecond Reading \nTHE LAW PRACTITIONERS \n(DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS) BILL \n(No. XXIV of 2025) \nThe Attorney General (Mr G. P. C. Glover, SC): Madam Speaker, I wish to inform \nthe House that I do not propose to proceed with the Law Practitioners (Disciplinary \nProceedings) Bill (No. XXIV of 2025), and that notice has already been given to the Clerk of \nthe National Assembly as far back as 18 November. \n \n \n \nTHE LAW PRACTITIONERS \n\n92 \n \n(DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS) BILL  \n(No. XXIX of 2025) \nOrder for Second Reading read. \n(4.19 p.m.) \nThe Attorney General (Mr G. P. C. Glover, SC): I, therefore, beg to move that the \nLaw Practitioners (Disciplinary Proceedings) Bill (No. XXIX of 2025) be read a second time. \nMadam Speaker, the Law Practitioners (Disciplinary Proceedings) Bill is a reform that \ngoes to the heart of the confidence that our citizens place in the legal profession – and, by \nextension, in the administration of justice itself. Legal practice is not merely a technical craft, \nit is surely not a business. It is a vocation rooted in trust.  \nThis Bill recognises that truth. It seeks to protect the overwhelming majority of \npractitioners who serve honorably, while dealing firmly and transparently with the minority \nwhose conduct undermines that trust. \nLet me state at the outset what this Bill does not do. You see, Madam Speaker, I stand \nhere as a member of that profession for forty years. A profession that I love and made me \nwho I am, a profession that I share with colleagues whose work and ethics I admire. I know \nthat most practitioners work with dedication, often unseen and unacknowledged.  \nBut we also know– because the public and the press regularly remind us of this – that \nthis confidence has been weakened by a perception that misconduct is not always dealt with \nswiftly, visibly or consistently.  \nI regularly receive visitors at my office. They are from all over the country; from all \nages. Some come with all their documents, neatly compiled over the years. Some with just a \nhandwritten note, their desperation poured on paper. \nThey want help. They think the “Minister for Justice”, as they often mistake the \nAttorney-General to be, is the one they should turn to, because they feel the system has failed \nthem.  \nThey do not understand why their plot of land is still disputed after many years, or why \nthe Courts have not struck down this deed of sale which they say is fabricated. When it is \nexplained to them what the Attorney-General’s Office does,  \nand why it is better that they turn to their legal advisers for such matters – it is then that the \nstories come out. \nMadam Speaker, Again, we are talking about a handful of rotten apples. But the acts \nand omissions of these legal practitioners besmirch the whole profession.  \n\n93 \n \nOften enough, fortunately, complaints will be unfounded. But even then, the perception \nof the public is that their accusations have not been dealt with efficiently or transparently. \nA few cases, a few repeated complaints, a few unresolved matters: sometimes, that is all \nit takes to erode the standing of an entire profession. \nMadam Speaker, this Bill is, therefore, not an act of suspicion. It is indeed an act of \nfaith in the profession, and an act of responsibility towards the public. It is an expression of \nconfidence that the reputation of law practitioners is worth protecting – that the best way to \ndefend the honor of a profession is to ensure that its disciplinary framework is fair, \nindependent, transparent, and effective. \nBefore explaining the architecture of the Bill, it is important to reflect on why this \nnecessary reform has taken this particular shape. For more than a century now, the system of \nself-regulation has prevailed. It has served us in some respects, but it has also shown clear \nlimits. The more so in recent years with the rapid increase in the number of law practitioners. \nWe are now almost 1600 barristers on the role of barristers in Mauritius; we are not talking of \nattorneys and notaries.  \nThe Bar Council, the Chamber of Notaries and the Law Society have all exercised \ndisciplinary oversight over their members, and they have done so conscientiously. However, \nthe system as a whole, has not delivered the consistency or transparency that a citizen can \nexpect in this 21st century.  \nComplaints accumulate, some remain unresolved for years, and some are closed or \nremain in limbo in ways that arouse suspicion. From the outside, observers conclude – rightly \nor wrongly – that lawyers cover for lawyers. This perception, fair or unfair, weakens the \nlegitimacy of the profession and of the justice system itself.  \nThe Government Programme has made accessibility and efficiency of justice clear \npriorities, and credible disciplinary proceedings are part of that mission. \nMadam Speaker, we did not embark on this reform lightly. Even though the previous \ndraft Bill had received the approval of Cabinet, I decided to go back to the drawing board \nafter having listened and heard the qualms of law practitioners. We held lengthy consultations \nwith all stakeholders: the Bar Council, the Law Society, the Chamber of Notaries, senior \npractitioners, young practitioners and members of the judiciary.  \nAnd this, it must be said, built on past feedback of previous draft versions of this Bill, \nelaborated under the previous Government. They did seek to tackle the subject, but when met \n\n94 \n \nwith serious objections, they lacked the ability to self-examine, compromise and improve. \nSince there was no political will, there was no change. \nToday, we have a Government with a clear political will and which will bring this much \nneeded change. \nAs I said, our consultations were substantive and intense. Many provisions of the Bill \nhave been modified to reflect the concerns and suggestions of the professions. But on one \npoint – the insistence on maintaining self-regulation – we could not compromise. \nIndependence is essential. A disciplinary system must not only be fair; it must be seen to be \nfair.  \nMadam Speaker, allowing the professions exclusive disciplinary authority no longer \nmeets that standard. Still, I wish to emphasise that the professional bodies retain a key voice \nin the new Commission. They nominate and are part of the decision-making process of \nappointment of members, they contribute expertise, and they participate in all divisions. Their \nrole is significant, though no longer exclusive. \nMy attention was recently drawn to the fact that some law practitioners would have \nbeen perceived to have meddled in unsavoury matters and could well become members of the \nCommission because the seemingly sole criteria is the fact that he/she has spent 15 years in \nthe profession. \nMy short answer is this: although the possibility, however remote, does exists, we must \nhowever foster the belief that all three heads of the three professions and the Attorney-\nGeneral of the day, would surely not fail in their duty to ensure that those appointed are \nbeyond reproach, and this, without a shadow of a doubt.  \nI am of those who firmly believe that our professions are teeming with good, honest \npractitioners who like to hold their head high. I trust that four of the most senior members of \nthe profession will never stoop so low as to choose someone with an unenviable track record \ntoo sit on the Complaints Commission. \nThat being said, allow me, Madam Speaker, to walk the House through the main \nmechanisms of the Bill, beginning with the establishment and composition of this new body: \nthe Complaints Commission. \n\n95 \n \nNow Clause 4 of the Bill establishes that Commission, as an independent statutory \nauthority empowered to receive, investigate and determine whether disciplinary proceedings \nshould be initiated. It is expressly insulated from the “direction or control of any person or \nauthority”. \nClause 5 proposes that it be composed of a Chairperson, two Vice-Chairpersons with \nsenior judicial or professional experience, as well as nine members nominated respectively by \nthe Bar Council, the Law Society Council and the Chamber of Notaries. This ensures both \nindependence and expertise. \nThe creation of the Appointment Committee here is the precise result of the feedback \nwe received from the professional bodies. There was a fear that an appointment process \nresting exclusively in the Attorney-General could transform this body into a controlling \ndevice of the executive over law practitioners.  \nThat had not been the intent of our first version, but the professional bodies pointed out \nthat future abuses by less scrupulous people could not be ruled out. They were right and we \nlistened to them. \nThe structure of divisions under Clause 6 reflects the specificity of each branch of the \nprofession: complaints against barristers are heard with two barristers sitting with the Chair \nor a Vice-Chair; similarly for attorneys and notaries.  \nIn doing so, the Bill ensures that standards are judged by those who understand the \nprofessional context, while avoiding the shortcomings of self-regulation. It is a balanced \nsolution which fits the Bill. \nThe procedure for opening complaints is set out clearly in Clause 8. Any person– \nincluding members of the public, judicial officers, the Attorney-General, and the professional \nbodies– may lodge a complaint. It must normally be filed within six months, though the \nCommission retains discretion to entertain serious complaints even if late. Importantly, the \nCommission may also initiate investigations proprio motu, that is, as you know Madam, \nSpeaker, of their own initiative. \nNow, to avoid abuse, Clause 9 gives the Commission power to dismiss complaints that \nare trivial, frivolous or vexatious. Where matters are minor or stem from misunderstandings, \nClause 10 empowers the Commission to attempt conciliation. This allows resolution without \nstigma and avoids unnecessary escalation. \n\n96 \n \nWhen an investigation is warranted, Clause 11 sets out the process: written \nexplanations, summoning of witnesses, compulsory production of documents – even recourse \nto the Judge in Chambers where confidentiality is invoked.  \nInvestigations must be completed within 90 days. This is an important guarantee of \ntimeliness and fairness. A staple inclusion now in the processes that this government is \nshaping for the justice system of this country. \nIn cases of minor misconduct, where the practitioner has no prior record, Clause 12 \nallows the Commission to administer a caution, a proportionate measure that protects the \npublic interest without imposing excessive sanctions. The Chief Justice, Attorney-General \nand the relevant professional bodies are then duly notified. \nWhere there is no evidence of misconduct, Clause 13 requires written notification to all \nparties, with reasons, including the complainant, of course. This protects practitioners from \nthe reputational harm of unsubstantiated complaints. \nIf, however, the Commission finds a prima facie case, Clause 14 mandates that it refers \nthe matter to the Supreme Court after obtaining the Solicitor-General’s advice on the \nformulation of charges. And, the Supreme Court then becomes the sole disciplinary authority. \nThis, Madam Speaker, is a point worth emphasizing. Case law, such as that of Geemul, \nhas firmly established that the disciplinary function of the Supreme Court over law \npractitioners are part of its inherent powers. That is, powers that, even when they are not \nexpressly provided for, are necessary to the good functioning of its judicial mission.  \nThe principle relating to the retention by the colonial Courts of their powers of \ndiscipline over barristers and the rationale behind it, having been succinctly explained by \nLord Denning in The Gambia, which was referred to with approval in the case of Geemul in \nMauritius, and I quote –  \n“By the common law of England, the Judges have the right to determine who shall be \nadmitted to practise as barristers and solicitors; and, as incidental thereto, the Judges \nhave the right to suspend or prohibit from practice.  \nIn England, this power has for a very long time been delegated, so far as barristers are \nconcerned, to the Inns of Court; and, for a much shorter time, so far as solicitors are \nconcerned, to the Law Society.  \n\n97 \n \nIn the colonies, the Judges have retained the power in their own hands at any rate in \nthose colonies where the profession is fused … \n Now advocates and attorneys have always been admitted in the Colonial Courts by the \nJudges, and the Judges only. The power of suspending from practice must, we think, be \nincidental to that of admitting to practise, as is the case in England with regard to \nattorneys.”  \nIn Mauritius, as we all know, Barristers, attorneys and notaries are admitted to practise \nby the Supreme Court, and only, the Supreme Court can therefore decide on eventually \nremoving them. \nWe have thus preserved this principle here: the Commission investigates, but it is the \nSupreme Court that decides. \nThis disciplinary process before the Supreme Court is addressed in Part III of the Bill.  \nClause 15 dictates the Court sits as a disciplinary tribunal composed of two judges, \nhearing the matter in open court except for justified exceptions.  \nClause 17, the Court may dismiss the charge, reprimand the practitioner, suspend him, \nstrike him off the roll, or issue warnings for breaches relating to AML/CFT obligations.  \nThe Court must determine the matters within 90 days, unless the delay is justified. \nClause 18 provides a right of appeal to the Court of Civil Appeal. \nNow, I have heard from certain quarters that this right of appeal to the Court of Civil \nAppeal is useless since the matter is dealt with at first instance by two judges.  \nIt is regrettable that such comments, devoid of any merit I must say at the outset, have \nbeen aired without having properly consulted the Civil Appeal Act 2025 which specifically \nprovides that the Court of Civil Appeal will consist of at least two judges. Hence, it can have \nmore than 2 judges.  \nIf I read section 11(2) of the Act, the Chief Justice may either proprio motu or on \napplication in writing made to him by any party of an appeal stating the reason for such \napplication, direct that the case be heard by more than 2 Judges having regard to the \n\n98 \n \nmagnitude of the interests at stake or the importance or intricacy of the questions of fact or \nlaw involved. \nIn these such disciplinary matters, since 1993 up to today, in all cases that we have \nseen, there have been at least three, and in certain circumstances, five judges that have been \ndesignated to hear such disciplinary matters at the Supreme Court. So, let my friends who had \nqualms rest assured that this was looked at properly. \nThere are a few proposed amendments that have been circulated yesterday, and which I \npropose to move for at Committee Stage in clauses 5, 9 and 20.  \nMadam Speaker, the purpose of this Bill is not punitive, but it is corrective.  \nIt strengthens the reputation of the profession by ensuring that complaints are handled \nfairly, independently and transparently.  \nIt protects the innocent by enabling frivolous complaints to be dismissed quickly, and it \nprotects the public by ensuring that serious complaints are addressed with rigour. \nMadam Speaker, the professions themselves – in all our consultations – acknowledged \nthat reform was needed. They too want clarity and consistency. They want a system that \ninspires public confidence. And they want unfounded allegations to be cleared without \nunnecessary delay. This Bill achieves that balance. \nThis reform also forms part of the wider transformation of our justice system.  \nWe have modernised appeals, judicial review, legal aid, and we continue to work \ntoward a justice system that is accessible, modern and humane. Public confidence is essential \nto that work.  \nCitizens who entrust their liberty, their property, the fate of their families to a legal \npractitioner must feel secure. They must know that the system will protect them if something \ngoes wrong – and conversely, a system that will also protect practitioners who face \nunjustified accusations. Fairness to all is the guiding principle. \nMadam Speaker, the legal profession is the backbone of justice. It is essential that it \nremains strong, respected and trusted. This Bill seeks to reinforce that trust. It is not a \n\n99 \n \ncriticism of the many, but a safeguard against a few. It is an act of confidence in the \nprofession and an affirmation of our duty to the public. \nI, therefore, Madam Speaker, commend the Bill to the House.  \nMr Uteem rose and seconded. \nMadam Speaker: So, we are going to listen to hon. Ramdass. Then, we will break. \n(4.41 p.m.) \nMr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle): Merci, \nMadame la présidente. Madame la présidente, d’abord, permettez-moi de remercier et \nféliciter l’honorable Attorney General pour avoir présenté devant cette auguste Assemblée ce \nprojet de loi, the Law Practitioners (Disciplinary Proceedings) Bill.  \nUn projet de loi, Madame la présidente, qui a pour objectif la création d’une entité \ncentralisée. Une entité, en fait, centralisée et chargée de traiter les doléances et les griefs \nformulés contre les praticiens du droit dans l’exercice de leur fonction.  \nPour bien comprendre cette démarche, Madame la présidente, il convient ici, pour moi, \nde rappeler que les praticiens du droit se retrouvent aujourd’hui à la croisée des chemins. En \nfait, au cœur même des interactions d’une part entre le citoyen et la réalité sociale dans \nlaquelle il évolue de l’autre. L’avocat, en fait, Madame la présidente, est le professionnel visé \npar l’article 10 de la Constitution de notre pays, lequel article, en fait, garantit le droit à une \nreprésentation légale dans une poursuite, un procès au pénal. \nEn ce qui s’agit, Madame la présidente, des revendications relevant du droit civil, \nl’avoué, lui, représente le justiciable en quête de justice et d’équité. Tandis que le notaire, lui, \nofficier public habilité à dresser les actes authentiques, confère aux citoyens de ce pays, \nMadame la présidente, des droits et obligations dans leur vie sociale. Ces praticiens du droit \nconstituent en fait des maillons essentiels de la mise en œuvre d’un aspect fondamental de \nnotre démocratie, celui de l’accès à la justice. \nMadame la présidente, having said this, in fact, the noble nature, the nobility of the \nthree branches of this profession – c’est-à-dire des avoués d’une part, les avocats et les \nnotaires – stands from the crucial role which they are called upon to exercise in the \n\n100 \n \nadministration of justice d’une part. Et deuxièmement, from the stringent ethical standards to \nwhich they are subjected under their respective code of ethics, c’est-à-dire the code of ethics \nfor barristers d’une part, the code of ethics for attorneys et the code of ethics for notaries. \nHowever, we can only observe, Madam Speaker, regrettably so, that the existence of \nsuch rules does not, unfortunately, guarantee that all members of the legal profession will \nnow toe the line and act in accordance with the principles that give to this profession its noble \ncharacter. Given that any breach of the code ethics by a legal practitioner is likely to have a \ndirect and sometimes even a severe impact on the lay client’s perspective, the lay client’s \nexperience of the justice system, it is only then natural and indeed essential, Madam Speaker, \nthat a stronger system of checks and balances be implemented once and for all.  \nWhilst the Mauritius Bar Association (MBA), the Mauritius Law Society (MLS) et la \nChambre des Notaires are already vested with investigative and disciplinary powers over \ntheir members as per the present law, the question now is whether the existing structures are \nstill adapted to the realities of the profession and the realities of our society, Madam Speaker. \nSi nous prenons, par exemple, Madame la présidente, la Mauritius Bar Association, le \nBar Council, comme l’a dit l’Attorney General, est composé de sept membres élus pour un \nmandat d’une année. De ces sept membres, deux doivent être impérativement pourvus d’au \nmoins 10 ans de pratique. Ce qui implique donc que les cinq membres restants peuvent avoir \nmoins de 10 ans de pratique. Et nous le savons tous, Madame la présidente, le barreau \nmauricien est de plus en plus jeune. Nous avons environ une centaine d’avocats qui prêtent \nserment chaque année. La proportion de nouveaux avocats inscrits en fait augmente \nconstamment. De ce fait, il ne serait pas surprenant, et même peut-être un petit peu \nrafraichissant, d’un certain point de vue, d’avoir un Bar Council majoritairement composé de \njeunes avocats.  \nCependant, Madame la présidente, bien qu’il soit une bonne chose que nous ayons de \njeunes avocats sur le Bar Council et sur le conseil, il serait quand même légitime de \ns’interroger quant à leur niveau d’exposition et d’expérience et surtout quant à leur niveau de \nmaturité pour traiter de ces cas potentiels de manquement déontologique.  \nIt has been a tradition at the Bar, Madam Speaker, to resort to senior members for \nguidance on matters relating to ethics and etiquette. In such a situation where the membership \nof the Bar is increasingly comprising of members of the younger generations, it is certainly \n\n101 \n \ntime to consider shifting investigative and disciplinary powers to a stronger body, a \nconsolidated body whose composition would reflect d’abord the seriousness of the task et \nbien sûr, the solemnity of the mission conferred upon it, that is to probe into allegations, into \nbreach of code of ethics and misconduct and to determine, Madam Speaker, the consequences \nthereof.  \nEn dernier lieu, Madame la présidente, it cannot be ignored that with the exponential, \nas I said before, with the exponential increase in the number of law practitioners, the number \nof complaints registered by the Bar Council on the one hand and the Mauritius Law Society \non the other hand, are also on the rise. And these bodies, Madam Speaker, are comprised of \nmembers elected on a periodical basis. I understand that it is one year for the Bar Council and \nif I am not mistaken, it is two years for the Law Society. And these members who are elected, \nthey are elected to hold office, not on a full-time basis. Hence the volume of complaints and \nthe limited mandate of each body necessarily implies that there are practical issues in the \ntimely disposal of any grievance formulated by members of the public, giving rise to \nfrustrations and the perception of injustice where no comprehensive action follows from a \ncomplaint or at least not in a timely manner. \nDonc, so much to say, Madam Speaker, que l’initiative de l’honorable Attorney \nGeneral, en fait, arrive donc à point nommé. And, obviously if we go to the Bill, Madam \nSpeaker, I do not propose to go through all the clauses of the Bill since the hon. Attorney \nGeneral has already done so. But I will only address l’Assemblée on a few clauses. If we look \nat clauses 4 and 5, as regards to the Complaints Commission, Madam Speaker, le projet de \nloi propose la création sous la clause 4, d’une Complaints Commission. Une commission \ncomposée d’un président, de deux vice-présidents et de neuf membres et le président et les \nvice-présidents devront être respectivement un juge à la retraite, un ancien magistrat ayant \nservi au moins quinze ans, un avocat ou un law officer, comptant au moins 15 ans de \npratique, donc une telle composition, Madame la présidente, garanti que les plaintes portées \ndevant la commission seront examinées par des professionnels aguerris, capable de \ncomprendre les attentes du public tout comme la réalité de la pratique de la provision légale. \nAutre clause, Madame la présidente, celle de la clause 15 qui parle du délai de 80 jours \ncomme nous l’a si bien dit l’honorable Attorney General, en fait la clause 15 (4) prévoit un \ndélai de 90 jours pour que la cour suprême statue sur toutes procédures disciplinaires portées \ndevant elle. Cela constitue, de mon point de vue, Madame la présidente, une avancée \n\n102 \n \nmajeure. Une avancée majeure puisqu’aucun délai n’existe actuellement sous les lois \nprésentes et ce qui a conduit le fait qu’il y a aucun délai sous les lois existantes, a conduit à ce \nque plusieurs affaires restent sans suite, minant ainsi la confiance du public et là, Madame la \nprésidente, je parle ici sous la correction de mes collègues avocats ici présents, dont vous-\nmême, Madame la présidente, qui se souviendront de plusieurs cas, dont je ne citerai pas les \nnoms ici, des cas de professional misconduct qui sont malheureusement restés impunis et \nsans aucune suite. J’en ai été témoin moi-même d’un gros cas de misconduct, il y a plus \nd’une dizaine d’années de cela. Je ne citerai pas le nom mais l’Attorney General saura de \nquoi je parle puisqu’il en a été témoin lui aussi. \nMadame la présidente, je faillirais à mon devoir, avant de terminer si je ne parle pas \npar contre d’un petit souci que j’ai par rapport à une petite incohérence, allons dire, par \nrapport à ce projet de loi. When I go through the Bill, Madam Speaker, I observe that it does \nnot specify the burden of proof which rests upon the Complaints Commission when it \nprosecutes a case before the Supreme Court and in fact, when we look at the Bill, clause 17 \n(1)(b)(3), Madame la présidente, we note that the outcome of such proceedings before the \ncourt, may be as severe as the erasure of the name of a law practitioner from the roll. This is \nindeed very extreme, Madam Speaker. It is indeed a very extreme measure. La radiation \ncomplète d’un avocat, d’un avoué ou d’un notaire. Je ne suis pas contre, mais par contre \npuisqu’il y va du livelihood du praticien, would it not be appropriate, Madam Speaker, to \nspecify in the Bill that the burden of proof should be beyond reasonable doubt or at least a \nhigher burden than that of the civil burden of proof which is on the balance of probabilities. I \nam saying this, Madam Speaker, of course, since the erasure of a professional, of a barrister, a \nnotary or an attorney from the roll, in fact goes to the very ability of that law practitioner to \nearn a livelihood and this should not therefore be taken lightly. \nMadame la présidente, en guise de conclusion, in fact, it is true to say that this Bill \naddresses many of the shortcomings in the existing structures. In fact, it enhances the process \nin a bid to hold accountable those law practitioners which disregard completely the letter and \nthe spirit of the code of ethics. Et, ce projet de loi, Madame la présidente, aura pour vocation \nde rendre à la profession légale ses lettres de noblesse puisque trop longtemps, Madame la \nprésidente, les valeurs de cette profession ont été effritées par les agissements de certains, des \nagissements impunis, des agissements sans qu’aucune sanction ne soit prise contre ces brebis \ngaleuses de la profession qui ternissent malheureusement la réputation de tous les avocats. \n\n103 \n \nMerci, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Merci ! \nSur ce, nous allons prendre un peu de thé. \nAt 4.52 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.39 p.m., with Madam Speaker in the Chair.  \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated.  \nYes, hon. Mr Lobine.  \n(5.40 p.m.) \nMr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix): Thank you, Madam \nSpeaker. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to commend the hon. Attorney General for bringing such an \nimportant reform before this House. The objective is clear and commendable, that is, to \nmodernise our disciplinary architecture for the legal profession, provide procedural clarity \nand enhance public trust in the administration of justice. And, as the hon. Attorney General \nrightly pointed out, there was a first draft then there were consultations with the Bar Council, \nwith the Law Society, with the Chambers of Notaries and there were several proposals made \nand as lawyers, we are glad that there has been a consensus and we are here before this House \nwith a very comprehensive and well-drafted piece of legislation.  \nMadam Speaker, this effort deserves recognition because it is taking us back to 1998 \nwhereby there was a Presidential Commission appointed Lord Mackay, of Clashfern to \nprepare a Comprehensive Report with regard to reform of the judicial and legal system and \nalso to have a look at the legal profession. So, way back, when there was the labour-led \ngovernment in 1998 with the then Prime Minister, the current Prime Minister, Dr. \nRamgoolam, that reform was on the agenda. I am glad today that we are continuing in this \nprocess to have access to justice and if I am not mistaken, it’s maybe the 27th or 28th Bill of \nthe Attorney General before this House to enhance access to justice with such a \ncomprehensive piece of legislation, again.  \nMadam Speaker, the major change, the fundamental change being brought through this \nBill is the full centralisation of disciplinary intake and investigation. Hon. Ramdass spoke \n\n104 \n \nabout Clause 4 whereby the establishment of the Law Practitioners Complaints Commission \nand also complemented by Clause 8 subsection 2 with regard to – \n“Where a complaint against a law practitioner is addressed to the Attorney-General, the \nBar Council, the Chamber of Notaries and the Mauritius Law Society Council, that \ncomplaint shall promptly be referred to the Complaints Commission.” \nIn the legal profession, Madam Speaker, there are a few that apprehend this piece of \nlegislation. They thought that this is a radical shift or change from what we are used to, that \nis, self-regulation but I would like to take a few examples so that our fellow lawyers will \nunderstand that the trend is for reform and this is being done in many Commonwealth \ncountries. So, this is not a radical proposition; this is in line with what many Commonwealth \ncountries have been doing for years now.  \nWe take the example of Australia, Madam Speaker. Each State and territory has a Legal \nServices Commission. These are statutory bodies completely independent from Bar \nAssociations. Their mandate is to investigate, mediate, and if necessary, prosecute legal \nmisconduct before independent tribunals.  \nIn the same vein, Madam Speaker, in New Zealand, they have the Lawyers and \nConveyance Act of 2006 created a single-entry complaints service managed by the New \nZealand Law Society but decisions are reviewable by the Legal Complaints Review Office, \nan entirely separate and impartial body. \nIn South Africa, Madam Speaker, they took the bold step through the Legal Practice \nAct 2014 which established the Legal Practice Council, a unified regulatory authority, \noverseeing all legal practitioners. It ensures that the public can lodge complaints in a \ntransparent and efficient manner. Even in Canada, Madam Speaker, in Ontario, the Law \nSociety functions as both a regulator and a complaint handler but decisions are made by \ndisciplinary tribunals with strict rules of independence and lay participation.  \nSo, this is not something out of the blue. This is the trend with regards to the modernity \nthat we are bringing in the legal profession. The hon. Attorney General pointed out, we have \ngot more than 1600 lawyers now and hon. Ramdass, has been saying that around 100 lawyers \nare being called to the Bar almost every year in Mauritius. So, the legal profession is a blend \nof old and newcomers with speciality in very specific fields.  \nMadam Speaker: It was 50 when I started.  \n\n105 \n \nMr Lobine: 50? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, only 50.  \nMr Lobine: So, all these, Madam Speaker, bring us to what we need – reform and, this \nwell-drafted piece of legislation is part of this process of access to justice. Madam Speaker, \nthere is a very important clause that I would refer to. I would not be repetitive to what hon. \nRamdass and the hon. Attorney General said but I would like to specify on Clause 9 of the \nBill.  \nIt empowers the Commission to dismiss complaints that are frivolous, trivial and \nvexatious. This is an essential filter because, Madam Speaker, unfortunately in Mauritius, we \nhave got a few jack of all trades and master of none. They know the profession more than \nothers and there are so many adverse comments because they do not know how the \nprofession functions.  \nFor example, you take the cab rank rule. Many people do not know the basics of this \nimportant rule because this is for lawyers. I must admit that at the level of the Bar, we need to \ndisseminate, educate and give proper guidance as to how the profession is all about. \nSo, this important filter is something that is very commendable. This is also mentioned \nin clause 8 (2) whereby all complaints would be now directed to the commission.  \nNow, what are the risks and the practical issues? The practical issue is that the \ncommission may risk becoming administratively overburdened. Why do I say so, Madam \nSpeaker? Because this practical issue is already well documented internationally.  \nA significant proportion of complaints received by legal regulators worldwide relates to \ndelays, communication issues or fee disputes, none of which constitute misconduct. That is \nwhy I would make a proposal here. In the United Kingdom, there is the Legal Ombudsman. I \nwill call it the Legal Ombudsperson. So, in the United Kingdom, Madam Speaker, service \nquality complaints are handled by the Legal Ombudsman, allowing disciplinary bodies to \nfocus solely on allegations of ethical or professional breaches.  \nSimilarly, Madam Speaker, New Zealand separates preliminary assessment and service \ncomplaints from serious disciplinary matters through the lawyers’ complaints service. \nIntroducing a similar mechanism here, whether now or at a later subsequent phase, could \ngreatly enhance the efficiency and clarity of the system. Why do I say so, Madam Speaker? \nWith the establishment of a Legal Ombudsperson, this would bring three major benefits.  \n\n106 \n \nIt would firstly educate the public about the distinction between misconduct and service \ncomplaints. It would also filter out non-disciplinary matters, ensuring the commission’s \nresources are used appropriately. Thirdly, to protect the commission from becoming \noverwhelmed, allowing it to concentrate on serious misconduct as intended by this Bill. \nThe commission’s mandate, Madam Speaker, as structured under clause 8 to clause 14, \nis to assess professional misconduct. A complementary mechanism to deal with service issues \nwould ensure disciplinary system remains accessible, efficient and fair.  \nSo, this is the proposal that I am making to the hon. Attorney General. This goes in line \nwith the Commonwealth (Latimer House) Principles. These are guidelines with regard to \npromoting good governance, democracy, but also to the rule of law, access to justice, and \nmost importantly, the independence of the legal profession. In this vein, I would humbly \ninvite the hon. Attorney General to consider this suggestion offered in a spirit of constructive \nreflection. \nI do not want to detract from the merit of this Bill. Rather, the aim is to reinforce \neffectiveness with regard to a balanced, independent, efficient and capable of maintaining \npublic trust in this new commission. At the end of the day, Madam Speaker, the Law \nPractitioners (Disciplinary Proceedings) Bill is a serious and thoughtful reform that aims to \nstrengthen transparency and also to give confidence to the public at large that the legal \nprofession is here to participate in this administration of justice.  \nSo, I would invite the hon. Attorney General to kindly consider whether maybe at a \nlater stage, we could implement this Legal Ombudsperson so that we can filter and also \ndisseminate what qualifies as misconduct or other complaints that could be dealt at \nadministrative level.  \nThis is my participation in this debate, Madam Speaker. I thank you for your kind \nattention. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nHon. Minister! \n(5.51 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations (Mr R. Uteem): Madam Speaker, \n32 years ago, on a cold evening of 25 November 1993, I was called to the Utter Bar of the \n\n107 \n \nSociety of Middle Temple. Incidentally, on the very same day, at the very same time, our hon. \nPrime Minister was being called to the bar at the Inner Temple! \nIn England, every barrister has to be a member of the professional association known as \nan Inns of Court. We have the Lincoln's Inn, Gray's Inn, Inner Temple and Middle Temple. \nWhat surprised me when I was admitted to the Bar is that each of these association carries the \nname ‘Honourable Society.’  \nWhen you are called to the Bar, you become a member of the Honourable Society of \none of the Inns of Court. Why? Because as is set out in the first paragraph of the Code of \nEthics for Barristers, I quote – \n“Honesty, integrity, independence and strict compliance with professional standards \nremain constant requirements for all those who seek to practise at the Bar.” \nUnfortunately, Madam Speaker, not all practitioners adhere to these ethical principles today. \nMost of us do, but not all of us.  \nThis Bill is providing the necessary legal framework for law practitioners to be held \naccountable for their actions and be subject to disciplinary proceedings, and where necessary, \nsanctions. So, as at today, there are two separate and distinct mechanisms to deal with cases \nof breach of etiquette, breach of professional misconduct involving law practitioners. By law \npractitioners, I mean barrister, attorney-at-law and notary public. \nFirst is by self-regulation. The professional bodies of which the law practitioner is a \nmember takes the sanction. The Bar Council, the Mauritius Law Society Council or the \nChamber of Notaries have the discretion to investigate any report made to it regarding alleged \nact of professional misconduct. The professional bodies can then reprimand or severely \nreprimand a law practitioner.  \nHowever, they are required by law – and that is very important – to attempt to reach an \namicable settlement, an amicable solution, and afford the law practitioner with an opportunity \nto be heard.  \nOnly where after preliminary investigation, there is prima facie case of serious \nprofessional misconduct that the professional body refers the matter to the Supreme Court for \ndetermination. So, that is the first general mechanism. \nThe second mechanism to investigate and institute disciplinary proceedings against a \nlaw practitioner rests with the hon. Attorney General. The Attorney General has the power, \n\n108 \n \nunder the Law Practitioners Act, either on his own initiative, proprio motu, or on receipt of a \ncomplaint, to enquire into act done by a law practitioner.  \nWhere the Attorney General is of opinion that the act done by a law practitioner calls \nfor the institution of disciplinary proceedings, he has to submit a detailed report to the Chief \nJustice who then proceeds to hear the matter.  \nSo, first, a self-regulation. Second, there is the Attorney General who refers the matter \nto the Supreme Court. Then, third, the Supreme Court itself under its inherent jurisdiction has \nthe power to hear and determine any complaint against a law practitioner under Section 18 of \nthe Courts Act.  \nBut as at today – and this is not going to change with this new Bill –, it is only the \nSupreme Court that has the power to order the name of a law practitioner be erased from the \nroll, so that he can stop practicing. I pause here to recomfort hon. Ashley Ramdass that the \nSupreme Court always acts reasonably when imposing the sanction. \nIn the case of Baboolall, for example, the Supreme Court held that the case will be \nvisited by a suspension of one year. So, they gave a suspension of one year. However, since it \nwas the very first case of disciplinary proceeding for such professional misconduct which did \nnot involve dishonesty towards the client, the court said that they were prepared to suspend \nthe decision for a period of three years. So, the Supreme Court is not going to lightly suspend \na law practitioner or remove him from the roll.  \nBut, Madam Speaker, in practice – I totally concur with the hon. Attorney General –, \nthe system is not seen to be working. The Supreme Court is rarely called upon to determine \nallegation of professional misconduct against law practitioners. I have gone through all the \nlaw reports in the past 25 years. There are only seven reported cases where disciplinary \nproceedings against law practitioners have been brought before the Supreme Court. \nTwo barristers and one attorney had their names removed from the roll of practicing \nlaw practitioners, and one barrister was suspended for a period of six months. Why? Is it \nbecause all practitioners are adhering to their code of ethics? Rather, there is the perception, \nMadam Speaker, that the current mechanism of disciplinary action against law practitioner is \nnot working. \nProfessional bodies, be it the Bar Council, the Law Society Council or the Chamber of \nNotaries hardly ever report a matter to the Supreme Court for disciplinary proceedings. There \nis the perception of the lawyers sticking together. You know, ‘You scratch my back, I will \n\n109 \n \nscratch yours.’ True it is that the law, as it currently stands, gives the power for them to \nattempt an amicable solution. Le linge sale après tout se lave en famille, Madame la \nprésidente. \nBut the law also requires them to refer cases to the Supreme Court whenever there is \nprima facie a serious breach of code of ethics. I will give an example, Madam Speaker, to \nillustrate my point. This is within the public domain and concerns this august Assembly \nbecause it was the subject of a PNQ last year on 12 June 2024. \nIt concerned the conduct of then Minister of Environment, Mr Kavydass Ramano. \nIt was established that whilst Mr Ramano was Minister of Environment, an application \nwas received at his Ministry of Environment for an environmental impact assessment. The \napplication was supported by a certificate, a document, under the letterhead of Étude Ramano \nsigned for Mr Kavydass Ramano. \nThere was a clear conflict of interest. You cannot be a Minister, be called upon to \ndetermine an EIA application, and your own personal notarial practice, l’Étude, is signing a \nletter confirming the ownership of the land – subject matter of the EIA application. The more \nso when the certificate is signed by an employee of that notary public.  \nAccording to the reply, the application was made on 08 May 2024, that is, more than \nfour and a half years after Mr Ramano had been a Minister. \nSo, he cannot come and say that these are works that he was doing before becoming a \nMinister. Four and a half years later, his Étude, of which he was the sole owner, was still \noperating and issuing certificates which are considered by his Ministry. Was that normal? \nWas that ethical? Yet, the Chamber of Notaries refrained to comment.  \nIn a communiqué, they stated, I quote – \n« Cette situation pourrait faire l’objet d’enquêtes, et par conséquent, la Chambre se voit \ncontrainte de ne faire aucun commentaire sur cette affaire spécifique. » \nWhat happened since? Where is the Chamber of Notaries? Have they conducted any \ninvestigation? Have they taken sanction? Have they referred the matter to the Supreme \nCourt? \nAnother example: the case of another notary public, Mr Vinay Deelchand. There were \nendless complaints from the public concerning his failure to comply with his statutory duties. \n\n110 \n \nIn September 2024, the Supreme Court even ordered him together with another \ndefendant to pay the sum of Rs2 million to a plaintiff concerning a fictitious sale. Yet, have \nyou ever heard les notables, the honourable members of the Chamber of Notaries referring a \ncase of Mr Deelchand to the Supreme Court for disciplinary action? The list is long, Madam \nSpeaker! \nNow, what about the then Attorney General? I will call him double honourable; hon. \nMember of an Inns of Court and a former hon. Member of Parliament. I am taking exception \nto the incumbent. \nFrom 2007 to 2009, there were a few cases where the Attorney General had reported to \nthe Chief Justice for disciplinary proceedings. Mostly were following conviction in criminal \ncases. But no disciplinary proceedings seemed to have been reported since 2014 by the then \nAttorney General. Madam Speaker, probably, according to their personal ethical standards, \nthere was no professional misconduct. \nMay I remind you who were those Attorneys General? Hon. Yerrigadoo, l’homme aux \nhonoraires de R 32 millions! The Minister who was forced to resign over the Bet 365 \nscandal.  \nWho was the other Attorney General? Hon. Maneesh Gobin, currently on bail for the \noffence of public official using office for gratification in breach of Section 7(1) of the \nPrevention of Corruption Act. Not so honourable after all! \nMadam Speaker, the problem is when you give the power to the Attorney General to \ninitiate or not to initiate disciplinary proceedings before the Supreme Court, you are \neffectively giving the power to a politician – again, no offence intended to the present \nincumbent –, but you are giving power to a politician to use this power to persecute a political \nopponent or use that power to protect his political allies. That is the problem with the current \nsystem.  \nIn June 2018, the Commission of Enquiry on Drug Trafficking in Mauritius, chaired by \nthe former Justice Lam Shang Leen, published its report. It sent shivers up and down the \nspine of law practitioners. It uncovered a fine-tuned system where certain law practitioners \nseem to be acting as accomplices for drug traffickers.  \nTo cite an extract of the report, at paragraph 19.5.3., – and that paragraph has not been \nexpunged by any order of the court – it is worth listening, Madam Speaker – \n\n111 \n \n“The Commission has very strong reason in the light of the evidence adduced before it \nto believe that there is a handful of barristers who may have acted and may still be \nacting in a most unethical manner, if not engaging in illicit activities such as \nobstructing the course of justice, intimidating witnesses, causing witnesses to diverge \nfrom their original statement version, thereby abstaining from incriminating drug \nbarons. They were also likely to have been using drug money to finance political \ncampaigns, possibly money laundering the proceeds of drugs trafficking in accepting \nwilfully tainted money, accepting cash beyond permissible amount and not accounting \nsame in their VAT receipt, and generally fostering incestuous relationship with drug \ntycoons.” \nWho were the law practitioners cited in the report? Who were les brebis galeuses? Most, if \nnot all, were from the MSM party, Madam Speaker!  \nAs the hon. Prime Minister said ‘kala prizon’, unsolicited visits to prisoners, mobile \nphone communication with drug lords serving their sentence in prison! \nLet me clear something. In the case of hon. Rubina Jadoo, she was a Minister. So, it is \ndirectly relevant to this House. She had to resign after her name was cited in the report. She \nwent to the Supreme Court and asked for a judicial review of the findings of the commission. \nOn two complaints, namely the phone communication with prisoners and the unsolicited \nvisits, the Supreme Court found no merit in her complaints and held that the decision of the \nCommission of Enquiry was not manifestly unreasonable or irrational. \nAnd what happened? Instead of the former Attorney General initiating an enquiry \nagainst the lady, the MSM gave her a ticket to run as candidate in Constituency No. 2 in the \nelections of 2024! Luckily the electorate threw them out. \nSo, Madam Speaker, we can see even under the self-regulation or under the existing \nAttorney General, it is not working. Legal proceedings, disciplinary proceedings are not \nbeing brought against law practitioners. Now, this will change with this Bill. With this Bill, \nwe will no longer have self-disciplinary actions by the Professional Association, the Bar \nCouncil, the Law Society Council, the Chamber of Notaries and no more, any power to the \nAttorney General to decide whether to institute legal proceedings or not. Instead, we are \nreplacing it by a new independent Law Practitioners Complaints Commission which will be \nan independent body and it will be under the direction or control of no person or authority. \n\n112 \n \nWhat is interesting, Madam Speaker, with this body, the Attorney General will not sit \non any of the inquiries. In fact, there will be a Chairperson or a Vice-Chairperson and two \nmembers of the relevant profession – \n• \nIf there is an inquiry over conduct of a barrister, there will be two barristers \nsitting on the Committee.  \n• \nIf there is an inquiry over an attorney, there will be two members of the Law \nSociety.  \n• \nIf there is an inquiry over the conduct of a public notary, we will have two public \nnotaries. \nWhat is also a very important departure from the existing law is that today professional \nmisconduct has been defined widely. It does not cover only breaches of the Code of Ethics \nbut also covers improper, disgraceful, dishonourable or unworthy act that has brought his \nprofession or her profession or the administration of justice into disrepute. So, that goes wider \nto just the black letter of the Code of Ethics and also goes in his personal life, you know, the \nway he has behaved in public, whether that has brought the profession in disrepute. The Bill, \nas the hon. Attorney General mentioned, has now a set deadline; six months to report the \ncomplaint and 90 days to complete the inquiry. This is most welcomed because for those law \npractitioners who want to clear their names, it is very important that there is a set timeframe \nto do so. Another important change – the disciplinary proceedings will now be heard in front \nof a bench consisting of two judges and the aggrieved party can appeal to the Court of Civil \nAppeal. This is a major difference from the current practice where disciplinary hearings are \nheard before three judges and the appeal is to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. \nMadam Speaker, the legal profession of which I am a part of, is in its very essence a \nvery noble profession and it goes, or at least should go, without saying that those admitted to \nthis profession must uphold the highest ethical standards and a top-notch professional \nconduct. Regrettably, even in the most respected profession, there are a few whose conduct \ntarnish the reputation of the many. This Bill is not just a legislative reform but a structural \nsafeguard for the rule of law, for fairness and for equal accountability whether the lawyer is \nwell connected or not.  \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister.  \n\n113 \n \nHon. Attorney General, I know you do not like me saying ‘winding up speech’. I just \nchecked; it is perfect English but I will ask you to round up. \n(6.10 p.m.) \nMr Glover: Madam Speaker, there is a well-known line from Shakespeare that is often \nquoted and let me hasten to add that before I actually spell out the words, that I do not \napprove, of course, of its contents. It is spoken not by reformers in the play Henry the Sixth \nbut by those plotting to destroy the rule of law, and it goes as follows – \n“The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.” \nThe meaning is very simple. If you wish to collapse a society, you begin by silencing \nthose who know the law, who defend rights, who safeguard due process. Far from being an \ninsult to the profession, the line just quoted, is thus a reminder of the centrality of lawyers in \nany functioning democracy. \nMadam Speaker, this is why the Bill before the House today matters. It recognises that \nthe strength of a democracy is tied to the strength of those who serve justice and it recognises \nthat public confidence is the bedrock on which the legal profession must stand.  \nIf at this stage, I could respond to my learned friends who have addressed the House \ntoday, to the hon. Ramdass, I will draw attention to the fact that section 15(2)(c) clearly spells \nout that the disciplinary proceedings before the Supreme Court shall be conducted in the \nsame manner as proceedings in a civil matter, and of course, that is, on a balance of \nprobabilities. The suggestion that lawyers should be treated differently from any other \nprofessional being placed before a Disciplinary Committee under the Workers’ Rights Act \nwould not sound very good. If it is good for everyone else, it should be good enough for us.  \nAs far as my learned friend, hon. Lobine’s comments are concerned, I take onboard the \nsuggestion of the complementary mechanism of the legal ombudsperson but I do think that at \nthis stage, and I take his point that we should  \nperhaps look at this in the future, if ever, we have this administrative overburden on the \nsystem. On the part of hon. Uteem, let me say that I have nothing to add.  \nThe vast majority of our attorneys, barristers and notaries, Madam Speaker, serve with \ndignity and competence but we must acknowledge an uncomfortable truth; confidence has \nbeen shaken, not because the profession is corrupt but because the system for dealing with the \nfew cases of misconduct has not kept pace with modern expectations. The Bill is not a \n\n114 \n \nreprimand of the profession, it is an act of respect, an act of commitment, an act of \nconfidence. It says clearly; ‘your honour matters’, ‘your role matters’, ‘your credibility \nmatters’ and we will help you protect it with a system that works, that is transparent and \nindependent. \nOur Government, Madam Speaker, has promised to renew the foundations of our \ninstitutions. We have said that democracy must be strengthened not only in its grand \nprinciples but in its everyday workings. A justice system cannot be credible if citizens doubt \nwhether misconduct in the legal profession is treated impartially, nor can it inspire confidence \nif lawyers themselves feel that well-intentioned colleagues are tarnished by the acts of a few. \nThe Bill answers those concerns with balance and clarity. \nMadam Speaker, a society that values the rule of law must also value those who \npractice it and valuing them means helping them uphold the highest standards. That is what \nthis Bill does. It protects the many from being stained by the few. It protects citizens who \nseek justice and it protects the integrity of the three professions and that is indispensable to \nthe health of our democracy. I thus commend the Bill to the House. \nQuestion put and agreed to.  \nBill read a second time and committed.  \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(Madam Speaker in the Chair) \nTHE LAW PRACTITIONERS (DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS) BILL (No. XXIX of \n2025) \nClauses 1 to 4 ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClause 5 (Composition of Complaints Commission). \nMotion made and question proposed: “that the clause stand part of the Bill.” \nMr Glover: Madam Chairperson, I move for the following amendment in clause 5 – \n“in clause 5, in subclause (4), by deleting the words “nominate 3 attorneys, 3 \nbarristers and 3 notaries” and “nominated attorneys, barristers and notaries” and \nreplacing them by the words “nominate 3 barristers, 3 notaries and 3 attorneys” \nand “nominated barristers, notaries and attorneys”, respectively;” \n\n115 \n \nAmendment agreed to. \nClause 5, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClauses 6 to 8 ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClause 9 (Trivial, frivolous or vexatious complaints). \nMotion made and question proposed: “that the clause stand part of the Bill.” \nMr Glover: Madam Chairperson, I move for the following amendment in clause 9 – \n“in clause 9, by deleting the words “section 9” and replacing them by the words \n“section 8”;” \nAmendment agreed to. \nClause 9, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClauses 10 to 19 ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClause 20 (Consequential amendments) \nMotion made and question proposed: “that the clause stand part of the Bill.” \nMr Glover: Madam Chairperson, I move for the following amendment in clause 20 – \n“in clause 20, in subclause (2), by deleting the words “subsection (2)” and \nreplacing them by the words “section 19H(2)”” \nAmendment agreed to. \nClause 20, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClauses 21 and 22 ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nThe title and enacting clause were agreed to. \nThe Bill, as amended, was agreed to. \nOn the Assembly resuming with Madam Speaker in the Chair, Madam Speaker reported \naccordingly. \n\n116 \n \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Law Practitioners (Disciplinary Proceedings) Bill \n(No. XXIX of 2025) was read the third time and passed. \nADJOURNMENT \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister, adjournment! \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Tuesday 09 December 2025 at 11.30 a.m. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded.  \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned! \nAt 6.23 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 09 December 2025 \nat 11.30 a.m. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n117 \n \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nAIR MAURITIUS & QATAR AIRWAYS – PROPOSED STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1163",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1163,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/1163) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to football tournaments in \nConstituency No. 6, he will state if consideration will be given to organise competitions, \nthrough the Mauritius Sports Council or any other relevant authorities under his purview, for \nall age categories in 2026, especially during school holidays.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRIVIÈRE DU REMPART DISTRICT COUNCIL – CRUSHER RUN DISTRIBUTION \n– QUANTITY DISTRIBUTED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1164",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1164,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1164) Dr S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the distribution of Crusher Run by \nthe District Council of Rivière du Rempart in Constituency No. 7, Piton - Rivière du Rempart \n\n125 \n \nsince January 2025 to date, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain and provide the list of \nthe sites where same was distributed, indicating in each case, the quantity thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nFÉDÉRATION MAURICIENNE DE JUDO – CLUBS SEEKING AFFILIATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1165",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1165,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/1165) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Fédération Mauricienne de Judo, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to where matters stand regarding \nthe 18 clubs seeking affiliation thereto, indicating – \n(a) \nthe ruling of the Sports Arbitration Tribunal in relation thereto, and  \n(b) \nwhether any decision has been taken pertaining to the recognition thereof and, if \nnot, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nAGRICULTURAL LAND CONVERSION – PROTECTION & PRESERVATION \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1166",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1166,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/1166) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to agricultural land, he will state the extent thereof converted for commercial and \nresidential purposes over the period 2019 to 2024, indicating the measures being envisaged \nfor the protection and preservation thereof for the purpose of farming and food production in \nthe face of the urgency to ensure food security.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \nLE BOUCHON – PIG BREEDING FARMERS – PROPOSED RELOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1167",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1167,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/1167) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the proposed relocation of the pig breeding farmers of Le Bouchon, he will state \nwhere matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n\n126 \n \n \nIMPAIRED DRIVING – LAW STRENTHENING PROPOSAL – MEASURES \nENVISAGED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1168",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1168,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/1168) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the proposed strengthening of the \nlegislative and enforcement framework to address cases of driving under the influence of \ndrugs and alcohol, he will state where matters stand, indicating whether Government intends \nto implement the announced measures, including the immediate impounding of vehicles and \nthe suspension of driving licences of the offenders involved therein.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCONGOMAH BRIDGE – RECONSTRUCTION TIMEFRAME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1169",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1169,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1169) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Congomah \nBridge, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether the \nreconstruction thereof is being envisaged and, if so, indicate the timeframe for the expected \nstart and completion dates thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMEDICAL REGISTRATION EXAMINATIONS – CANDIDACY – M.E.S VETTING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1170",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1170,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1170) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port-Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Medical \nRegistration Examinations, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Medical \nCouncil, information as to – \n(a)  the number of – \n(i)  \ncandidates sitting therefor over the past five years, on a yearly basis, \nindicating the corresponding number of passes and pass rate, and  \n(ii)  attempts open to a candidate to sit therefor, and  \n(b)  whether the examination papers are vetted by local medical consultants in \ncollaboration with the Mauritius Examinations Syndicate.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed that prospective candidates need to make an application for \nMedical Registration Examinations as per Section 22 (1) (ca) of the Medical Council Act. No \ncandidate is allowed to appear in the Medical Registration Examination unless he possesses a \n\n127 \n \ndiploma in Medicine or an equivalent qualification awarded by a recognized medical \ninstitution listed in the Medical Council Act 1999, as amended, and that the candidate has \ncompleted to the satisfaction of the Medical Council a period of not less than 18 months of \nPre-Registration Training. \nWith regard to part (a) (i) of the question, out of 722 candidates who sat tor the Medical \nRegistration Examination over the past five years, 434 candidates have successfully passed \nthe Medical Registration Examination, corresponding to a pass rate of 60.1 per cent. \nI am placing in the Library of the National Assembly statistics regarding the number of \ncandidates who took part in the Medical Registration Examination on a yearly basis for the \nperiod 2021-2025.  \nWith regard to part (a) (ii) of the question, I am further informed that there is no limit to \nthe number of attempts to the Medical Registration Examination for candidates who have not \nbeen declared successful in the Medical Registration Examination. \nRegarding part (b) of the question, the examination papers for the Medical Registration \nExamination are neither vetted by the local medical consultants nor by the Mauritius \nExaminations Syndicate. The setting up of questions for the Medical Registration \nExaminations and marking of same is entrusted to the National Board of Examinations in \nMedical Science of India. \nDuring the first year that the Medical Registration Examination was being held, two \nrepresentatives of the National Board of Examinations in Medical Science of India were \nbringing the examination papers for candidates who would be appearing for the examination. \nThe question paper of a duration of three and a half hours consisted of 200 Multiple Choice \nQuestions.  \nIn addition, the questions that were asked during the examinations were electronically \nselected from a bank of questions available at the National Board of Examinations and the \nmarking of the answers were also done electronically. The National Board of Examinations \nstated that there is no human interference at any stage of the examination. The venue for the \nexamination was decided by the Mauritius Examinations Syndicate. \nAs from 17 September 2020, a new Memorandum of Agreement has been signed \nbetween my Ministry, the Medical Council of Mauritius, the Dental Council of Mauritius, the \n\n128 \n \nMauritius Examination Syndicate and the National Board of Examinations in Medical \nScience of India.  \nAs per the MOA, the Medical Registration Examination is defined as a Computer \nBased Examination, of a duration of three hours comprising 150 Multiple Choice Questions. \nIn June 2024, the Memorandum of Agreement was renewed for another period of three years \ntill 2027. \nFERTILITY ISSUES – DIMINISHING BIRTH RATE – MEASURES ENVISAGED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1171",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1171,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1171) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to fertility in \nMauritius, he will state the – \n(a) \nbirth rate over the past ten years, indicating the reasons for the trend observed; \n(b) \nnumber of public fertility centres established island-wide, indicating the number \nof persons experiencing fertility issues registered thereat and the support provided \nthereto; \n(c) \nprojected economic cost to the Mauritian society should the birth rate continue to \nfall, and  \n(d) \nthe measures being envisaged to tackle infertility.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBASSIN ROAD, QUATRE BORNES – BUS SERVICE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1172",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1172,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/1172) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the bus route along Bassin Road in \nQuatre Bornes, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport \nAuthority, information as to the number of buses currently deployed on same, indicating the \nfrequency of service during peak and off-peak hours.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIUS-UNITED STATES – TRADE NEGOTIATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1173",
      "sitting_id": "02-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-02",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1173,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives",
      "question": "(No. B/1173) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives whether, in regard to \nongoing negotiations with the United States in relation to our exports, he will state where \nmatters stand. \n\n129",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-02-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1174",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1174,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1174) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the MBC-Rodrigues \nServices, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the state of the audio-\nvisual equipment and other related logistical facilities available at the Station therefor to \nensure the smooth running thereof and provision of enhanced coverage, reliability and picture \nquality, indicating the consideration being given for the upgrading thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed that in February of this year, \nsoon after assuming office, the Director General of the MBC undertook a visit to MBC \nRodrigues to assess operational conditions, review the technical and logistical requirements \nof the Station, and engage with staff with a view to motivating them. \nHis visit revealed that the MBC Rodrigues Station has been functioning during the \nprevious years with audio-visual equipment totally inimical to the provision of a modern and \nhigh standard broadcasting service. In fact, MBC Rodrigues had become as if a dumping \nground for used and second-hand equipment, which were no longer useful to the MBC \nMauritius. \n\n18 \n \nSubsequent to the visit, in March 2025, a technical team comprising a Broadcast \nOfficer/Senior Broadcast Officer and a Consultant were commissioned to carry out a \ncomprehensive technical audit and to evaluate both the production and training needs of \nMBC Rodrigues. \nThe audit exercise evaluated the state of cameras, the studio equipment, the editing \nsystems, and other production tools and identified several items that had surpassed their \noptimal service life and required replacement. \nFurthermore, Madam Speaker, in October and November 2025, technical missions were \ncarried out in Rodrigues by a team from the MBC and Multi-Carrier (Mauritius) Ltd to \nimprove production capacity, strengthen transmission reliability, and enhance picture quality. \nThese missions have delivered tangible results, including improved studio lighting, camera \nadjustments and enhanced picture quality. Maintenance was also carried out on all the \ntransmitters sites, including FM Radio and an island-wide survey has confirmed that \ntelevision and radio coverage was satisfactory. No complaint regarding picture quality, \nreliability or coverage has been reported following the audit and maintenance exercise. All \nthe MBC channels remain available across Rodrigues. \nIn addition, following the recommendations of the technical audit, practical training \nwas provided to Production and News personnel from the 19 October to 04 November 2025. \nThis training strengthened staff competencies in camera operation, news production, and field \nreporting, contributing to a marked improvement in the quality of locally produced content. \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed that in November 2025, the Director-General of \nthe MBC undertook a second visit to MBC Rodrigues, during which several other priority \nareas for improvement were identified.  \nMadam Speaker, it is clear that under the previous regime, MBC Rodrigues was the \nleast of their priorities.  \nUnder this Government and the new Management of the MBC, the MBC Rodrigues \nStation has not been left out. Accordingly, corrective measures are being implemented to \nimprove the services offered by the Station. A total of Rs12.7 million has been allocated by \nthe MBC under its Annual Procurement Plan specifically for upgrading of Rodrigues \nfacilities. Procurement of new cameras, audio-visual systems, studio equipment and other \n\n19 \n \nproduction tools which is already underway. This investment demonstrates our clear \ncommitment to strengthening the Rodrigues’ Station. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to assure the inhabitants of Rodrigues that this Government is \nfully dedicated to ensuring the smooth and efficient operation of broadcasting services in \nRodrigues. It is, in fact, the policy of this Government to treat all parts of our territory, \nwhether it is mainland Mauritius, Rodrigues, Agaléga, St Brandon and Chagos on the same \nfooting. We are committed to providing our citizens with the same level of all public-funded \nfacilities and services, beyond radio and TV services, irrespective of the part of the Republic \nof Mauritius they reside in. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr François: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I thank the hon. Prime Minister as well as \nthe DG. May I ask the hon. Prime Minister in line with the vision to upgrading the broadcast \ncapacity and to well equip MBC Rodrigues, whether consideration will be given to acquire an \nOutdoor Broadcasting Vehicle (OB Vehicle) for production and live transmission of news, \nentertainment, sports and cultural events from any location other than at the Citronelle MBC \nRodrigues? \nThe Prime Minister: The hon. Member is right. There is no OB Vehicle in the \nRodrigues Station at the moment but there is one OB Unit which is available. I will certainly \npass that request to the Director General. \nMadam Speaker: Very good! \nMr François: A second supplementary? May I ask the hon. Prime Minister whether he \ncan confirm if further or additional recruitment will be carried out thereat? \nThe Prime Minister: My understanding is that they have just done training, as I said in \nmy answer, but I am not aware that further recruitment will be done but I am sure that the \nDirector General will do that if he feels there is a need for it. \n Mr François: Thank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Next question. Hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River! \n \n \n\n20 \n \nSHIPPING AGENTS – PORT LICENCE – FEES PAYABLE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1175",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1175,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1175) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River)  asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Shipping \nAgent License, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number \nthereof currently in operation, indicating the fees payable therefor and when same were last \nreviewed.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I presume the hon. Member is referring to Port \nLicence issued to Shipping Agents. \nIn accordance with Section 4(1)(g) of the Ports Act, the Mauritius Ports Authority shall, \nas landlord, exercise licensing, regulating and controlling functions in respect of port and \nmarine services not provided by the Authority. In addition, section 24 of the Ports Act \nstipulates that no person shall provide any service or facility unless so authorised by a licence \ngranted by the Mauritius Ports Authority.  \nThe issuance of licences for the supply or handling of cargo, goods, bunker, water, \nother equipment, labour or other services within the limits of a port, the outer port or the port \npremises is governed by the Ports (Issue of Licences) Regulations 1981, concerning the issue \nof licences. It further provides that a separate licence shall be required for each business or \nactivity that is asked for. This licence may be issued or renewed for a period not exceeding \none year, subject to such conditions as may be imposed by the Mauritius Ports Authority \nagainst payment of an annual fee as prescribed in the Port (Fees) Regulations 2008. \nI am informed, Madam Speaker, by the Mauritius Ports Authority, that port licences are \nissued to Shipping Agents which are designated by owners or charterers of vessels to \nrepresent their interests and act on their behalf when calling at the port. \nPresently, there are 34 companies licensed to operate as Shipping Agents in the port \narea and every licensee pays an annual fee of Rs15,000, as prescribed in the Second Schedule \nof the Port (Fees) Regulations 2008.  \nFollowing a Port Tariff Study undertaken by the Mauritius Ports Authority in the year \n1999, a prescribed fee of Rs15,000 was then fixed to be payable by Shipping Agents. The \nHouse will note that since the last 25 years, these fees have not been reviewed.  \n\n21 \n \nI am further informed, Madam Speaker, that a contract was awarded on 01 October \n2024, that is, just a few weeks before the General Elections, for the conduct of a Port Tariff \nStudy by Strategic Networking Partners & Consulting Ltd for a sum of Rs7,202,267, \nexclusive of VAT. The scope of the study is to set a revised tariff structure that would reflect \nthe real value of port services provided and benchmarked with those being practised \nregionally and internationally.   \nThe Consulting company was expected to submit the Final Report in April 2025. \nHowever, the Draft Final Report was submitted, seven months later, on 28 November 2025. I \nam informed that the bidding document prepared by the Procurement Policy Office did not \nprovide for penalty clauses in the General Conditions of Contract for consultancy services. \nHowever, Clause 14 of the General Conditions of Contract provides for the termination of the \ncontract in the event the consultant commits a material breach or fails to remedy a failure in \nthe performance of its obligations under the Contract within seven working days after being \nnotified, or within any further period as the client may have subsequently approved in \nwriting.  \nThe Mauritius Ports Authority has not applied this Clause with regard to the late \nsubmission of the report. An inquiry into the matter is accordingly being initiated. \nApproval of the Board of the Mauritius Ports Authority on the recommendations of the \nPort Tariff Study is expected before the end of January 2026. And necessary amendments \nwould accordingly be made to the Port (Fees) Regulations to give effect to the revised port \ncharges and fees. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Mr Babajee, yes. \nMr Babajee: Will the hon. Prime Minister submit a list of licences issued from 2014 to \n2024, and whether, all those licences have been in norms with the regulations? Will he be \nable to table it? \nThe Prime Minister: I can submit a list of these licences.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, alright. Okay.  \nThen, it is Mr Jhummun, Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac.  \n \n \n\n22 \n \nMETRO EXPRESS LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT SYSTEM – PUBLIC SECURITY – \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1176",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1176,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1176) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether in regard to the Metro \nExpress Light Rail Transit System, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the measures being taken to ensure public security \naround the stations and onboard the wagons thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRESIDENCE BARKLY – ASSAULT CASE – 6-YEAR-OLD GIRL – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1177",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1177,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1177) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin &Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether in regard to the \nassault on a 6-year old girl, named L., at her place in Residence Barkly on Monday 24 \nNovember 2025, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of \nPolice, information as to the outcome of the inquiry carried out thereinto and the \ncircumstances of the arrest of the suspected perpetrator thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nDHYANAVARTAM LTD – LOANS GRANTED – INVESTIGATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1178",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1178,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1178) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the loans granted by the State Bank of Mauritius and the Mauritius Investment \nCorporation Ltd. to Dhyanavartam Ltd., between 2022 and 2024, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Financial Crimes Commission, information as to where matters \nstand concerning the inquiry initiated thereinto, indicating the – \n(a) \nnumber of persons interrogated and/or arrested as at to date, and \n(b)  actions taken, if any, to recover these loans, given that the said company has \nalready initiated winding-up procedures. \n\n23",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I shall reply to \nParliamentary Questions B/1178 and B/1181 together, as they relate to the same subject \nmatter. \nI am informed by the Financial Crimes Commission that a preliminary investigation \nwas initiated on 10 February 2025 into loans granted by the State Bank (Mauritius) to \nDhyanavartam Ltd which is the operator of the Maradiva Hotels and Resorts Spa. \nAt the very outset, I am informed that the State Bank of Mauritius granted a loan of \nRs1.4 billion to Dhyanavartam Ltd and a further loan of Rs1.65 billion was again given to \nthem by the Mauritius Investment Corporation Ltd.  Hence, as at 30 September 2025, the \nloans extended by the two entities to Dhyanavartam Ltd amount to approximately Rs3.1 \nbillion. The collateral held against the loans is both in terms of fixed charges and floating \ncharges. \nI am further informed that the Financial Crimes Commission is currently investigating \ninto the matter. So far, 48 statements have been taken from 27 witnesses and 13 \ninterrogations have been conducted with 7 suspects.  On 18 June 2025, the Financial Crimes \nCommission proceeded with the arrest of Mr Premchand Mungur, former Chief Executive \nOfficer of State Bank (Mauritius) Ltd and provisionally charged him for an offence of fraud \nby abuse of position in breach of section 43 of the Financial Crimes Commission Act. On 03 \nDecember 2025, Mr Mungur was arrested again and provisionally charged for an offence of \nconspiracy in breach of section 48 of the Financial Crimes Commission Act, respectively.  \nOn the same day, the Financial Crimes Commission also proceeded with the arrest of Sanjiv \nKailash Ramdanee for an offence of conspiracy in breach of Section 48 of the Financial \nCrimes Commission Act. \nI am further informed, Madam Speaker, that no recovery action has been initiated since \nthe loan facilities are inscribed against the asset of the company. The State Bank has a first \nranked charge over the asset. As the House is aware, there is ongoing inquiry on this matter, \ntherefore, I cannot give other information. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Jhummun.  \nMr Jhummun: Thank you, Madam. Can the hon. Prime Minister inform the House \nwhether, the former Chairman of the SBM Holdings, Mr Sattar Hajee Abdoula, has been \ninterrogated as he has been dealing with such toxic loans? \n\n24 \n \nThe Prime Minister: I am not aware of who is being interrogated but the inquiry is \nongoing.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Yes, Mr Beejan, because both questions were taken together.  \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Prime Minister inform the \nHouse what was the purpose for which the loans were contracted? \nThe Prime Minister: I am not sure. It so happens that they were huge loans. What was \nthe purpose? I cannot say at this point. \nMadam Speaker: Another one, yes. \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Prime Minister inform the \nHouse what guarantee was submitted so that the loan be disbursed? \nThe Prime Minister: I did not go into the nitty-gritty because there is an inquiry going \non, and I don’t want to prejudice the inquiry.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. We will find out in due course.  \nYes, now we have hon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle. \nMAURITIAN RUPEE – STABILISATION – FOREIGN CURRENCY \nEXCHANGE RATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1179",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1179,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1179) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose \nBelle) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Mauritian Rupee, he will state whether same has stabilised over the past year \nhaving regard to the official exchange rate of same vis-à-vis the US Dollar and the Great \nBritain Pound compared to fluctuations in previous years, indicating whether the measures \ntaken by the Bank of Mauritius have helped the economy, particularly, in relation to inflation, \nimport costs and investor confidence compared to past periods of higher exchange-rate \nvolatility.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, when this Government took office in \nNovember last, the forex market was in total chaos.  The exchange rate of the Mauritian \nrupee was on a steeply declining slope, depreciating at a very rapid pace vis-à-vis all \ncurrencies, in particular against the US dollar, thus fuelling inflationary pressures in the \n\n25 \n \neconomy and rapidly eroding the purchasing power of the population.  Madam Speaker, this \nis the situation that we have inherited. \nIn fact, from December 2014 to October 2024, the rupee depreciated, some say \nintentionally, by 46% against the US dollar and by 21% against the British Pound. To make \nmatters worse, the previous government even indulged in money printing of over Rs180 \nbillion purposely to give a false sense of prosperity to Mauritians. This has exacerbated the \nalready excess liquidity situation in the banking system which, as we all know, further fuelled \ninflationary pressures. \nIt is no wonder, Madam Speaker, that consumer prices in Mauritius increased by a \ndramatic 43.3 percent from December 2014 to October 2024, and import prices went up by \n63 percent. I think these figures speak for themselves. \nThe dramatic fall in the value of the Mauritian rupee has had profound and far-reaching \nadverse effects on our economy, affecting households, businesses, and overall confidence in \nthe system.  \nOne of our first priorities when we came into power was to correct that disastrous \nmismanagement of the previous government. The Bank of Mauritius has acted urgently to \nstabilise the value of the rupee and to curb inflationary pressures through its monetary policy. \nThe Bank of Mauritius adjusted its policy rate in February 2025. It also issued \ninstructions to banks to ensure that forward transactions are priced in a fair manner and in \naccordance with market fundamentals. In addition, the Bank of Mauritius has sold USD 244 \nmillion on the market from November 2024 to 04 December 2025. \nAt the level of Government, we have supported the efforts to increase the supply of \nforex on the market by imposing that at least 85 percent of the proceeds from sales of villas \nunder the Property Development Scheme should be paid in rupees. \nFurthermore, as from this fiscal year, all businesses that receive at least 50 percent of \ntheir annual turnover in foreign currency are paying their tax in foreign currency. The Tourist \nFee of 3 Euro per night per tourist effective as from 01 October this year is also generating \nadditional foreign exchange for the country. \nMadam Speaker, these measures have contributed to an improvement in the forex \nmarket conditions. I am informed by the Bank of Mauritius that as from 03 January 2025 to \n04 December 2025, the rupee has appreciated by 3.4 percent against the US dollar, whereas \n\n26 \n \nduring the same period, it actually depreciated by 5.5 percent. During the same period, the \nBank of Mauritius has also successfully reduced the depreciating trend against the British \nPound from 6 percent to 3.6 percent. \nThe measures taken to stabilise the exchange rate have contributed to a fall in headline \ninflation in Mauritius. Import prices have actually gone down by 4.4% between the third \nquarter of 2024 and the second quarter of 2025.  \nThe headline inflation rate is estimated at 3.5 percent in November 2025, well within \nthe target range of 2 to 5 percent. \nMadam Speaker, it is clear today that the shift away from the previous regime’s opacity, \nad-hoc policymaking and excessive money-printing have restored a sense of predictability \nand discipline to our economic management.  The rupee is now more stable. We have been \nable to reduce inflation, as I said, it stands at 3.5 percent this month. May I remind the House \nalso that a number of amendments to the Statistics Act were introduced in the Finance Act \n2025 so as to restore credibility and independence to Statistics Mauritius.   \nOur actions have brought the country back on a path of economic stability and investor \nconfidence has been restored. But we still have a long way to go. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Now, hon. Babajee! \nPRISONS DETAINEES – HIV CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1180",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1180,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1180) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the prisons, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Prisons, information as to \nthe current number of detainees thereat, indicating the number thereof being – \n(a) \nwomen detainees, and \n(b) \nHIV positive, further indicating whether they – \n(i) \ncontracted same inside or outside the prisons, and \n(ii) \nare under antivectorial treatment in line with the World Health \nOrganisation Guidelines.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Prisons \nthat, as at 04 December 2025, there was a total of 2,848 detainees in prisons.  \n\n27 \n \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am also informed that there are, presently, 214 \nfemale detainees in our prisons. \nRegarding part (b) (i) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Prisons \nthat there are 359 detainees who are HIV positive. Upon admission, all detainees undergo \nmedical examination, which includes HIV testing. While some detainees are already aware of \ntheir HIV-positive status before their admission, others are diagnosed through the routine \nblood tests conducted on-site.   \nRegarding these 359 HIV infected detainees, all of them were already living with HIV \nprior to their coming into prison. \nMadam Speaker, with respect to part (b) (ii) of the question, I presume that the hon. \nMember’s question pertains to Antiretroviral Therapy (ART), which targets HIV viruses.  \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Prisons that detainees who are diagnosed with \nHIV are immediately placed under antiretroviral therapy. The treatment is provided in \naccordance with the guidelines of the World Health Organisation and national health \nprotocols. The treatment is continuous and uninterrupted throughout detention, including \nduring court appearances, hospital admissions, or transfers between prisons. \nI am also informed that awareness and sensitisation campaigns on HIV are organised by \nthe Mauritius Prisons Service in collaboration with the Ministry of Health and Wellness, and \nthe NGO Kinouété across all penal institutions throughout the year.   \nFor instance, in the context of the World AIDS Day, which was observed on 01 \nDecember this year, a candlelight vigil was held at the Eastern High Security Prison, Melrose, \nin memory of those who passed away with HIV in Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Babajee, is it alright?  \nHon. Edouard, Fourth Member for Rodrigues! \nDHYANAVARTAM LTD – SBM LOANS – INQUIRY STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1181",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1181,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1181) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether in regard to the \ninquiry initiated by the Financial Crimes Commission on the disbursement of loans by the \nState Bank of Mauritius after the year 2014 to Dhyanavartam Ltd., he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain information as to where matters stand. \n\n28",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/1178) \nRODRIGUES – INCOME TAX & VAT REVENUE – THREE-YEAR \nOVERVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1182",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1182,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1182) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether in regard to the taxes, including \nIncome Tax and Value Added Tax, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nMauritius Revenue Authority, information as to the yearly quantum of revenue collected in \nRodrigues in terms thereof over the past three financial years.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Mauritius Revenue \nAuthority that over the past three financial years, the quantum of tax revenue collected by the \nAuthority in Rodrigues were as follows – \n(a) \nRs148.0 million in Financial Year 2022-2023; \n(b) \nRs137.4 million in Financial Year 2023-2024, and \n(c) \nRs156.6 million in Financial Year 2024-2025. \nI am further informed that the income tax collected in Rodrigues amounted to – \n(a) \nRs81.5 million in Financial Year 2022-2023; \n(b) \nRs68.7 million in Financial Year 2023-2024, and  \n(c) \nRs78.6 million in Financial Year 2024-2025. \nRegarding Value Added Tax, the following amounts were collected – \n(a) \nRs64.8 million in Financial Year 2022-2023; \n(b) \nRs67.3 million in Financial Year 2023-2024, and \n(c) \nRs76.4 million in Financial Year 2024-2025. \nMadam Speaker, although the tax collection in Rodrigues is Rs150 million on average \nannually, Government provides more financial resources for the economic and social \ndevelopment of Rodrigues.  In fact, for the current financial year, the total resource allocated \nto Rodrigues amounts to Rs10.1 billion, of which – \n\n29 \n \n• \nRs5.78 billion of recurrent and capital grants to the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly; \n• \nRs1 billion for construction of the new Runway at Plaine Corail; \n• \nRs340 million for the development of the water sector; \n• \nRs223 million for subsidy on ration rice, flour, LPG, petroleum products and \ncement, and \n• \nRs60 million for Land Drainage Projects. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nHon. Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nNATIONAL AGENCY FOR DRUG CONTROL – CANNABIS DEPENALISATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1183",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1183,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1183) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to cannabis, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Agency for \nDrug Control, information as to whether consideration will be given to requesting the \ntechnical committee that will be set up to work on the depenalisation thereof to consider same \nfor recreational use and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Chief Executive Officer \nof the National Agency for Drug Control that the Drug Control Board, at its fourth meeting \nheld on 16 October of this year, decided to set up a Technical Committee comprising experts \nin public health, the criminal justice system, fiscal policy, neuroscience, addiction medicine, \nharm reduction and representatives from the Ministry of Health and Wellness, to conduct a \ncomprehensive review of the three proposed technical models on the regulation of cannabis, \nnamely – \n• \nDepenalisation; \n• \nDecriminalisation, and  \n• \nRegulated Legalisation. \n\n30 \n \nAs part of its preparatory work, the Agency has initiated discussions with the UNODC \nand the WHO for Mauritius to benefit from specialised expertise and ensure that the review is \nfully aligned with global best practices and public health standards. \nIn parallel, consultations are being held with the Attorney General’s Office to address \nthe legal complexities associated with the three proposed models and to determine the precise \nlegislative drafting requirements for any future     implementation within the Mauritian legal \nframework. \nMadam Speaker, the Technical Committee is planning to meet in January 2026 and will \nproduce a legal brief outlining the domestic requirements and the international treaty \ncompliance options for the regulation of cannabis. In parallel, from January to March 2026, \nan assessment of the public health impacts will be carried out to identify the most equitable \nand effective model.  \nIt is expected that a draft blueprint and proposed administrative framework will be \nsubmitted by July 2026. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, why is it that the Technical Committee has been set up \nbut that the Select Committee of Parliament which was promised by Alliance du Changement \ncomprising Members of both sides of the House to assist, to give views, and to, of course, \ndeliberate on the issues of the drug problem and to make recommendation to that entity. Why \nis it that this part has not been done and you have proceeded with the Technical Committee? \nThe Prime Minister: I believe that they wanted to have expert opinions first before \naddressing that issue with the Parliament. \nMr A. Duval: May I ask then, Madam Speaker, when will that Select Committee then \nsee the light of day so that Members of Parliament can also participate in this national \nproblem? \nMadam Speaker: Yes!  \nThe Prime Minister: That does not depend on me. It depends on when they will… \nMadam Speaker: But you are not saying ‘no’? \nThe Prime Minister: I am not saying no. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, you are not saying ‘no’. That’s it. \n\n31 \n \nHon. Jhummun! Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, please! \nMadam Speaker: I have already called the hon. Member. \nMr A. Duval: But, please. \nMadam Speaker: Please, you cannot. I have already called the hon. Member. You had \ntwo supplementary questions. \nFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS – BANK CHARGES, FEES & COLLATERAL \nSECURITIES – REVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1184",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1184,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1184) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the bank charges, fees and collateral securities regarding loans granted by financial \ninstitutions, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Bank of Mauritius, \ninformation as to – \n(a) \nwhen same were last reviewed, and \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given to aligning same to international norms and \nstandards applicable in other jurisdictions.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Bank of Mauritius that \nthe fees, charges and commissions levied by banks are determined by these institutions \nthemselves in the light of their business strategies, operational model, internal policies and \nrisk assessments. \nNonetheless, as the regulator for the banking sector, the Bank of Mauritius closely \nmonitors the fees, charges and commissions charged by its licensees to ensure that these are \nnot inordinate. Whilst the banking market is driven by competition, the Bank of Mauritius \nalso focuses on protecting customers of banking services against abuses. \nIn that regard, the Bank of Mauritius requires commercial banks to submit their \nschedule of fees, charges and commissions on a half-yearly basis to the central bank. With a \nview to enhancing transparency and enabling consumers of banking services to make \ninformed choices, the Bank of Mauritius has made it mandatory for all banks to upload all \ninformation pertaining to fees and charges on their website and to affix these conspicuously \n\n32 \n \nin all branches. The templates of all commercial banks are also published on the website of \nthe Bank of Mauritius to enable customers to have a comparative view of all fees, charges \nand commissions charged by the banks. \nFurthermore, banks are obligated to notify the Bank of Mauritius of any change \neffected in their fees, charges and commissions, in which case these changes and their impact \nare assessed to safeguard the interests of customers and the public. The last submission by \ncommercial banks of their fees and charges template was made in July 2025. \nBy virtue of section 6 of the Bank of Mauritius Act 2004, the Bank of Mauritius has the \npower to regulate the fees and charges in respect of the services provided by these financial \ninstitutions and impose such limitation on the quantum of those fees and charges as it may \ndeem appropriate.  \nI am also informed by the Bank of Mauritius that issues pertaining to fees, charges and \ncommissions as well as improvements to be brought to customer service delivery are \ndiscussed with the Chief Executive Officers of all the commercial banks during its quarterly \nBanking Committee Meeting chaired by the Governor of the bank. The last such meeting was \nheld on the 19 November of this year. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am further informed by the \nBank of Mauritius that although there are no generally agreed international norms or \nstandards relating to fees and charges levied by banks, the Bank of Mauritius will carry out a \ncomprehensive study on these fees and charges and take appropriate actions, if deemed \nnecessary. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Time is up! \nNow, we have been advised that B/1186, B/1187, B/1192, and B/1193 have been \nwithdrawn. \nNow, we go to questions to other Ministers. \nHon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues, Mr J. Edouard. Is that right? You are not with me? \nYour questions to hon. Ministers! We are doing questions to hon. Ministers. Am I \nwrong? \nMr Edouard: Excuse me, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker: It happens to me as well, hon. Edouard. Do not worry! \n\n33 \n \nRODRIGUES – EDUCATIONAL REFORM PROPOSAL – STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1185",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1185,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1185) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether in regard to the Equal \nOpportunities Tribunal, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the – \n(a) \nnames of the former President and members thereof; \n(b) \npresent composition thereof, and \n(c) \nnumber of pending cases, if any, thereat.",
      "answer": "Reply: The Equal Opportunities Tribunal is established in accordance with section 34 \nof the Equal Opportunities Act and consists of a President and two Members, who are \nappointed by the Public Service Commission. The post of President and Members of the \nEqual Opportunities Tribunal are established in the Civil Establishment Order. \nSince the establishment of the Equal Opportunities Tribunal in 2012, the posts of \nPresident and Members of the Tribunal are filled on a part-time basis in as much as the low \nnumber of cases being referred to the Tribunal. \nAs regards part (a) of the question, I am informed that Mr Denis Henri Vellien was \nassigned the duties of President of the Equal Opportunities Tribunal during the period 13 \nJune 2012 to 22 February 2022. Thereafter, his services were retained on a contractual basis \nfrom 23 February 2022 to 21 August 2022. Following the expiry of the contract of Mr \nVellien, Mrs Sulakshna Beekarry-Sunassee, in her capacity as Assistant Solicitor-General, \nwas assigned the duties of President of the Equal Opportunities Tribunal from 26 August \n2022 to 02 May 2023 until her appointment as Puisne Judge of the Supreme Court on 03 May \n2023. \n\n132 \n \nA recommendation has already been made to the Public Service Commission for the \nfilling of the vacancies on a part-time basis. \nAs regards part (c) of the question, I am informed that as at date, there are 29 cases \npending before the Equal Opportunities Tribunal. \n \nRODRIGUES – NATIONAL POLICE BAND – RECRUITMENT EXERCISE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1186",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1186,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1186) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the National \nPolice Band, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, \ninformation as to – \n(a) \nwhere matters currently stand concerning the recruitment exercise therefor, and  \n(b) \nwhen was recruitment last carried out for the Rodrigues Police Band and whether \nconsideration will be given to proceeding with recruitment therefor in view of its \ncurrent understaffing and the recurrent need to bring officers of the National \nPolice Band to perform for major ceremonies in Rodrigues.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPOLICE QUARTERS – LODGING VACATION – ALTERNATIVE \nACCOMMODATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1187",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1187,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1187) Ms S. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Police Officers, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the number thereof having had to vacate their \nlodging in police quarters on retiring due to sudden or serious illness, indicating – \n(a) \nthe time allocated thereto and their families to find alternative accommodation, \nand  \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given for a review of the current practice in such \ncircumstances.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n\n133 \n \nSSR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – TAXI OPERATORS – REPORTED \nAGGRESSION CASE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1188",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1188,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1188) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the taxi \noperators at the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the measures being \nenvisaged to – \n(a) \nensure the security thereof, especially, following the recent reported case of \naggression on or about 15 November 2025 on the chairman of the taxi \noperators, and \n(b) \nprevent any illegal taxi operation thereat and if there is any reported case of \nalleged illegal transfer of taxi licence to operate thereat.",
      "answer": "Reply: As the House may be aware, the issue of illegal operation of taxi services at Sir \nSeewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport by out-based taxis and other vehicles has \nbeen ongoing for quite a number of years. \nOn 09 December 2024 and 21 October 2025, two meetings were held by the hon. \nMinister of Land Transport in the presence of the hon. Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional \nIntegration and International Trade, and other hon. Members of the National Assembly of the \nconstituency, with relevant stakeholders with a view to ensuring effective and efficient taxi \nservices at the airport. The following recommendations were made – \n(i) \nenhance police presence at arrivals and enforcement at the airport; \n(ii) \nCCTV camera surveillance to be effective; \n(iii) the display of taxi counters to be more conspicuous, and  \n(iv) wearing of uniforms by drivers to be included as a condition of the taxi licence. \nAnother meeting was held on 17 November 2025 at the level of the Ministry of Land \nTransport following which a letter was issued on 28 November 2025 to the Commissioner of \nPolice to take necessary measures to enhance security at the Arrival concourse for the safety \nand security of the taxi operators based at the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International \nAirport. \nIn regard to parts (a) and (b) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of \nPolice that, on Saturday 15 November 2025, Mr Y.A., a taxi driver operating at Sir \nSeewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport reported an incident to the Airport Police \n\n134 \n \ninvolving Mr A.U. The latter was allegedly canvassing two female tourists and heading \ntowards his vehicle. When Mr Y.A. informed the tourists that Mr A.U. was an illegal taxi \noperator, an altercation broke out between them. Mr A.U. physically assaulted Mr Y.A. as a \nresult of which the latter got injured. Thereafter, Mr Y.A. was conveyed to Jawaharlal Nehru \nHospital, Rose Belle for medical attention and was discharged the following day.  \nPolice has recorded the statement of Mr Y.A.  \nOn 23 November 2025, the accused Mr A.U. was interviewed by the Police in \nconnection with the case of “Simple Assault”.  On 04 December 2025, he called at Airport \nPolice Station, accompanied by Counsel, where his defence statement was recorded.  \nA further statement of the victim Mr Y. A. will be recorded. \nFurthermore, the Police is awaiting the medical reports from the Government Medical \nOfficer, to be included in the case file.  \nUpon completion of the enquiry, Police will decide whether to prosecute the accused \nMr A.U. for the offence of “Simple Assault”.  \nThe Airport Police is responsible for policing in the precinct of Sir Seewoosagur \nRamgoolam International Airport and its vicinity. They are also assisted by the personnel of \nthe Criminal Investigation Division and Anti-Drug and Smuggling Unit as well as other \nexternal agencies, such as the Customs Anti-Narcotics Section of the Mauritius Revenue \nAuthority, Airports of Mauritius Ltd and Airport Terminal Operations Ltd. \nThe airport area is also under CCTV cameras surveillance manned by Airports of \nMauritius Ltd. \nThe Airport Police and personnel of the Mauritius Revenue Authority carry out \nregular stop and check of persons and vehicles in the compound of the airport for the \nprevention and detection of illegal activities. \nI am further informed that following the incident which occurred on  \n15 November 2025, the Officer-in-Charge of Airport Police has taken the following \nadditional measures with a view to ensuring security and preventing illegal taxi operations at \nSir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport – \n(i) \nPolice presence has been increased at strategic locations by deploying more \nPolice Officers on foot and mobile patrols; \n\n135 \n \n(ii) \nthe Illegal Taxi Squad of the Airport Police responsible for preventing illegal \ntaxi from operating in the compound of the airport has been reinforced with \nadditional personnel being deployed for duty;  \n(iii) \ntaxi operators and employees working at the airport are being sensitised to \nreport illegal activities, including illegal taxi operating in the compound of the \nairport for prompt police actions; \n(iv) \njoint crackdown operations are being carried out twice weekly by Airport \nPolice and Criminal Investigation Division to prevent illegal taxis from \noperating at Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport; \n(v) \nthe Airport Police is working in close collaboration with Airports of Mauritius \nLtd with a view to identifying suspicious vehicles detected through CCTV \nCameras, and \n(vi) \nthe National Land Transport Authority has been requested to carry out \ntargeted operations at the airport. \nAs regards illegal transfer of taxi licenses to operate at Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam \nInternational Airport, no such complaint has been reported to the Police so far. \nGovernment will look into the whole issue of operations of illegal taxi at the airport, \nincluding the car park thereat. A new Smart Car Park system is being implemented and is \nexpected start operating tentatively on 15 December 2025. Installation of equipment has been \ncompleted and the configuration of the system is in progress. \n \nSSR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – DEPARTURE & ARRIVAL – \nBIOMETRIC PASSPORT INTRODUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1189",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1189,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1189) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the departure and arrival of passengers at the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam \nInternational Airport, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to –  \n(a) \nthe measures being envisaged to streamline the different processes thereat with \na view to avoiding long queues, indicating, in each case, the timeframe for the \nimplementation thereof, and \n(b) \nwhere matters stand as to the – \n\n136 \n \n(i) \nimplementation of a new border control management system, and \n(ii) \nintroduction of the biometric passport.",
      "answer": "Reply: Numerous representations have been made since a number of years by \npassengers and economic operators regarding delivery of various services and particularly \nlong queues at the check-in and immigration counters, at the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam \nInternational Airport. My Government will soon be introducing a new E-Border Management \nSystem and the biometric passport, to improve immigration services. \nThis new E-Border Management System will include, inter-alia, Advance Passenger \nInformation system, biometric identification of passengers, real time border surveillance, \nautomated border control gates for self-service eGates, risk profiling and eVisa. The new \nSystem will provide a fully integrated, digital and intelligence-driven platform for an \nenhanced travellers’ experience and contribute in positioning Mauritius as a trusted and \nefficient travel hub in the region. \n As regards the biometric passport, also known as e-Passport, it will incorporate \nbiometric data stored in a microchip for easy recognition of the passport holder. \nGiven that the new E-Border Management System and the biometric passport will be \ninterfacing with each other, the technical specifications of both projects are being worked out \nconcurrently. \nI am informed that, in the meantime, the following short-term measures have been \ntaken by the Airports of Mauritius Co. Ltd to streamline the processes and to improve the \noverall preparedness at the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International Airport for the \nupcoming peak season – \n(i) \noptimization in allocation of check-in counters to airlines; \n(ii) \ndedicated lanes for priority passengers which include Business Class, First Class \nand passengers with special needs; \n(iii) coordination with the Airport Police for crowd management at entry gates to \navoid congestion; \n(iv) deployment of additional screening staff; \n(v) \nenhanced coordination with ground handling teams to reduce delays in baggage \nhandling and delivery, and \n(vi) modification and improvement of the carousel to enhance the delivery of arrival \nbaggage. \n As I have stated in different fora, in order to be a first-class destination, we need to \nhave a first-class airport. That is why my Government is coming up with projects which will \n\n137 \n \nmodernise the whole system and infrastructure of the airport by leveraging new technologies \nto enhance the passenger experience. \n \nCONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW COMMISSION – NATIVE INCLUSION – OUTER \nISLANDS SPECIFICITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1190",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1190,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1190) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Constitutional \nReview Commission that will be set up, he will state whether – \n(a) \nconsideration will be given for the inclusion of a native of the Outer Islands, \nincluding Rodrigues, Chagos and Agalega to form part thereof, and \n(b) \nthe specificities of the Outer Islands will be addressed by same.",
      "answer": "Reply: The Constitutional Review Commission, now being finalised, stands as a \nsolemn pledge by Government to revitalising democratic principles and strengthening \ngovernance to bolster public confidence in the autonomy of Government institutions. \nIn view of the complex and sensitive nature of constitutional reforms, it is imperative \nthat the exercise be led by experts who possess not only solid constitutional acumen but also \na thorough understanding of the distinctive historical, social and institutional context of \nMauritius. \nIn regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the House that the Chairperson has \nalready been identified and the Attorney General shall meet him in the days to come to \ndiscuss and finalise the composition of the Commission.  The House will appreciate that, at \nthis stage, it would be premature to take any commitment on the membership of the \nCommission. \nAs regards to part (b) of the question, I would like to reassure the House that in this \nhistoric engagement with democracy, Government will ensure that the Commission is \nmandated to examine all constitutional matters relevant to the governance, administration, \nand rights pertaining to the Republic as a whole. This will necessarily include the distinct \ncircumstances, needs and developmental realities of Rodrigues, Agalega, the Chagos \nArchipelago, and any other Outer Island. \nAIR MAURITIUS LTD. – AIRPLANES SALE – AUDIT FINDINGS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1191",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1191,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1191) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \n\n138 \n \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the external audit performed on the sales of the airplanes by Air Mauritius Ltd. after \nit entered voluntary administration, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information \nas to whether the auditor’s report is ready and, if so, indicate whether same will be tabled or \notherwise dealt with.",
      "answer": "Reply: I presume that the hon. Member is referring to the independent forensic \ninvestigation which was commissioned by the new Board of Air Mauritius Ltd., appointed \nsoon after the General Elections. \nFollowing a proper procurement exercise, on 23 April 2025, the Board of Air Mauritius \nLtd. appointed KROLL Middle East Consultancy Ltd. to conduct an independent forensic \ninvestigation with the following terms of reference – \n(i) \nthe rationale for sale/disposal of five aircrafts (two A340-300, two A319-100 and \none A330-200) during the voluntary administration in 2020/2021; \n(ii) \nleasing of two A330-200s in 2022, and \n(iii) the order of one additional A350-900 in 2023. \nKROLL has indicated that its report has not yet been finalised and a meeting has been \ntentatively scheduled with Air Mauritius around mid-January 2026 to review the status of the \nexercise. Upon submission of the report, the Board of Air Mauritius will examine the findings \nand decide on the appropriate course of action. \n The other parts of the question, therefore, do not arise. \nCOVID-19 (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 2020 – PROSECUTIONS – \nFINES & CONVICTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1192",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1192,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1192) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Covid-19 \n(Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2020, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information \nas to the number of individuals prosecuted for breaches thereof, indicating the number of – \n(a) \nconvictions secured, and  \n(b) \nfines imposed and total quantum of revenue collected in terms thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \n\n139 \n \nDRIVING LICENCES – BIOMETRIC DRIVING LICENCE, TRACKING SYSTEMS \n& MONITORING MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1193",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1193,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1193) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the driving \nlicence, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information \nas to the number of reported cases of fake ones identified over the past ten years, \nindicating the number of drivers involved in accidents found to be holding fake \nones or non and outcome of cases lodged against them, and  \n(b) \nstate whether he will consider – \n(i) \nintroducing biometric driving licence, automated licence plate recognition \nand in-car computer systems to track flagged vehicle and drivers, and  \n(ii) \nrecommending the monitoring of the licensing department.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUES REGIONAL ASSEMBLY ACT – RODRIGUES ELECTORAL \nSYSTEM – REVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1194",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1194,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1194) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the proposed \nintroduction in the Assembly of proposed amendments to be brought to the Rodrigues \nRegional Assembly Act and electoral reform for Rodrigues, he will state where matters stand, \nindicating whether urgent consideration will be given thereto.",
      "answer": "Reply: In the Government Programme 2025-2026, we stated that “Government will \nembark on wide consultations to implement inclusive and participatory reforms aimed at \nmodernising the electoral process and bringing celerity in the access to justice over electoral \nmatters.” \nIn this context, a Communiqué was issued by my Office on 02 December 2025, inviting \nall stakeholders, including Political Parties, Academia, the Mauritian Diaspora, Trade \nUnions, NGOs and Civil Society Organisations, and the public at large to submit their \nproposals and suggestions to my Office by Friday 30 January 2026.  Rodrigues will have the \nopportunity to submit its proposals for electoral reforms. \n\n140 \n \nWith regard to the amendments to the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act, my Office \nhas received proposals from the hon. Member, following a meeting that hon. Mrs Franchette \nGaspard Pierre Louis, Minority Leader of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly and Deputy \nLeader of Organisation du Peuple de Rodrigues, has had with the Deputy Prime Minister on \n25 September 2025. \nAt a recent meeting that hon. Grandcourt, Chief Commissioner of the Rodrigues \nRegional Assembly, has had with the Deputy Prime Minister, it has been agreed that a \nCommittee will be set up to look into the review of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act \nand the Electoral System. \nI am informed by the Rodrigues Regional Assembly that its Executive Council has not \nyet approved any amendment to be brought to the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act. \nOn receipt of proposed amendments from the Rodrigues Regional Assembly, \nconsultations will be undertaken with all relevant stakeholders with a view to ensuring a \ncomprehensive review of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act. \n \nPLAINE CORAIL AIRPORT – INSUFFICIENT PARKING SPACE – ACTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1195",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1195,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1195) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Plaine Corail \nAirport, in Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from Airports Holdings \nLtd., Airport of Mauritius Ltd. and Airport of Rodrigues Ltd., information as to whether the \nissue of insufficient parking space thereat will be addressed pending the implementation of \nthe new airport development project, indicating – \n(a)  the number of parking slots currently available for motorcycles, vehicles and \nbuses, and  \n(b)  whether consideration will be given for the provision of additional temporary \nparking slots along the Route de l'Autonomie and/or opposite or adjacent to the \nPlaine Corail Police Station.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by Airport of Rodrigues Ltd that no complaint has been received \nregarding insufficient parking space at the Plaine Corail Airport. This has also been \nconfirmed by the Rodrigues Regional Assembly.  \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, Plaine Corail Airport has a parking capacity of \n120 slots as follows – \n(i) \nCars/Hatchback/Pick-up/SUV  \n- \n88 \n\n141 \n \n(ii) \nMotorcycles  \n \n \n- \n25 \n(iii) \nBuses  \n \n \n \n- \n4 \n(iv) \nTaxis  \n \n \n \n- \n3 \n The fees charged for parking are Rs20 for Cars/Hatchback/Pick-up/SUV and Rs40 for \nbus/lorry/minibus. It is free for motorcycle. These fees are fixed and have been last reviewed \nin the year 2012.  \nMy attention has been drawn to the inefficiency in the management of the parking \nspace thereat. The following issues have been noted – \n(i) \nfixed nominal parking fees irrespective of duration of parking time; \n(ii) \nabsence of control in the parking area with an average of 39 vehicles parked for \nmore than one day, and \n(iii) collection of fees manually by a parking collector during flight operations only. \nTo address these issues, Airport of Rodrigues Ltd is proceeding with the reallocation of \nexisting parking bays, thus releasing approximately 25 parking slots currently used by airport \npersonnel, for the public. Staff vehicles will be relocated to a designated green space area.  \nIn addition, appropriate tariffs would be introduced for long-term parking. Daily and \novernight parking rates will be implemented within the next six weeks. Prior to their \napplication, an information and awareness campaign will be rolled out to ensure users are \nadequately informed. \nMoreover, a time-based charging system supported by automated parking management \nequipment will be introduced within six to nine months, to streamline entry, exit, and fee \ncollection. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, Airports of Rodrigues Ltd will coordinate with \nthe Rodrigues Regional Assembly and the Police to secure temporary parking facilities in \ndesignated spaces opposite and adjacent to the Plaine Corail Police Station, should the need \narise.   \nI wish also to inform the House that the New Runway Project at Plaine Corail makes \nprovision for 223 parking slots for the public. \nINCOME SUPPORT SCHEME – BENEFICIARIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1196",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1196,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/1196) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nEducation and Human Resource whether, in regard to the proposed implementation of \neducation reform in Rodrigues, he will state where matters stand concerning the issue of – \n(a) \nnational colleges;  \n(b) \nproposed abolition of mixity in schools, and \n(c) \nchange of educational stream in case of repeated failures.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, following the “Assises de l'Education et des \nRessources humaines” held in Mauritius and Rodrigues in April and May 2025, respectively. \nMy Ministry is in the process of developing a strategic plan, blueprint, for the \ntransformation of the education sector for the Republic of Mauritius. The views and proposals \nshared by stakeholders during the “Assises de l'Education” as well as the specificities of \nMauritius, Rodrigues and Agaléga have been duly taken into account in the drafting of the \ndocument. \nMadam Speaker, in Rodrigues the eight existing secondary schools admit student to \ngrade 7 based on – \n1. \nGrade aggregate obtained by the candidate in the PSAC assessment; \n2. \nParental choice; \n3. \nDistance between the residence of the candidate and the school allocated, and \n4. \nAvailability of seats. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the hon. Member that my \nMinistry will together with the Commissioner for Education of Rodrigues, examine the \npossibility of including one or more schools as National Secondary Schools for Rodrigues. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the hon. Member that during \nthe “Assises de l’Education et des Ressources humaines” held in Rodrigues in May 2025, the \nproposal to abolish co-education was not raised by stakeholders. In fact, learners in \nRodrigues are accustomed to co-education right from pre-primary to secondary level. My \nMinistry will consult the Commission for Education for Rodrigues and other Rodriguan \nstakeholders during the ongoing discussions in the context of the upcoming transformation in \nthe education sector. \n\n34 \n \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (c) of the question, I wish to inform the hon. \nMember that my Ministry is examining the modalities of allowing students from the regular \nstreams who have repeatedly not succeeded in the lower secondary classes to join the \nFoundation Programme in Literacy, Numeracy and Skills subject to the consent of the \nresponsible parties. \nAs regards those students who are experiencing difficulties at mid-lower secondary \nlevel, they are encouraged to explore other sectors of education which would be better \nadapted to their competencies. In fact, the Mauritius Institute of Training and Development \n(MITD) offers several courses to students who have completed three years post-primary \nschooling including those who are below 16 years old. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \nMr Edouard: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Minister for his reply. Will the hon. \nMinister consider the improvement of the courses run at MITD so as to cater for what he has \njust said regarding the repeated failures? \nDr. Gungapersad: Thank you, hon. Member, during the “Assises de l’Éducation et des \nRessources humaines” held in Rodrigues proposals were made and MITD has taken good \nnote of it and soon these will be implemented. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, are you okay? Next question is from the hon. Second Member \nfor Rodrigues, hon. François! \nSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS – IMPLEMENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1197",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1197,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade",
      "question": "(No. B/1197) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nForeign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade whether, in regard to the \nSustainable Development Goals, he will state where matters stand as to the implementation \nthereof, indicating whether consideration will be given for the establishment of a Sustainable \nDevelopment Goals Committee within our National Assembly.",
      "answer": "Mr Ramful: Madam Speaker, it may be recalled that in 2015, the United Nations \nGeneral Assembly adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, a framework built \naround 17 Sustainable Development Goals designed to drive economic, social and \nenvironmental progress. Mauritius is fully committed to its global agenda and continues to \nimplement it through a coordinated national approach. To ensure coherence across \nGovernment, the Sustainable Development Unit was established within the Ministry of \n\n35 \n \nForeign Affairs in January 2021. The Unit oversees interministerial coordination through \ndesignated SDG focal points, supports national reporting processes and guides the monitoring \nof timelines and commitments. \nIn parallel, Madam Speaker, Statistics Mauritius has developed a comprehensive \nnational SDG database which serves as a single publicly accessible platform for indicators \nand strengthens the foundations of evidence-based policy making. Mauritius presented its \nfirst voluntary national review in 2019 and its second in July 2024 before the High-Level \nPolitical Forum in New York. The 2024 review, inter alia, identified challenges, notably the \nneed to expand access to grants and concessional financing for climate action and call for \nstronger international partnerships. According to the 2025 Sustainable Development Report, \nMauritius achieved an SDG Index Score of 70.3, well above the regional average and ranked \n76 out of 167 countries. Significant progress has been made in poverty eradication, \ninnovation, infrastructure development, financial inclusion and digital connectivity. A \npositive spill-over score of 75.13 further demonstrates that Mauritius contributes more \npositive than negative impacts to global sustainable development. \nTo accelerate implementation, Mauritius and the United Nations signed the Sustainable \nDevelopment Cooperation Framework 2024-2028, the joint steering committee of the SDCF \nco-chaired by myself and the UN President Coordinator ensures oversight and alignment with \nnational priorities. Its three thematic results groups, people, prosperity and planet are fully \naligned with the Government Programme 2025-2029. The meeting of the SDFC joint steering \ncommittee held in October 2025, was an opportunity to take stock of progress made, as well \nas providing guidance to the results groups.  \nFinancing remains at the heart of the SDG implementation. While domestic resources \nform the backbone of development efforts, we continue to mobilise international \npartnerships. Global initiatives including the Sevilla Commitment and the Doha Political \nDeclaration reinforce international commitments to support a climate action, sustainable \nfinance and poverty reduction. Mauritius is also working with the UN Economic Commission \nfor Africa to adopt the integrated planning and reporting toolkit which align national \nstrategies with the SDGs and Agenda 2063, strengthen coordination and facilitate automated \nreporting.  \nAs regards the second part of the question, my Ministry also recognises the \nInterparliamentary Union’s call for parliaments to institutionalise oversight of the 2030 \n\n36 \n \nAgenda. Establishing an SDG Committee within the National Assembly would reflect global \nbest practice and reinforce accountability. Accordingly, we propose initiating consultations to \nexplore its establishment according to the Standing Orders and of course, subject to the \nconsent of the Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, I was thinking this would be more for me than for the \nMinister… \nMr Ramful: Yes, of course. \nMadam Speaker: …but it is very good. Maybe you should remember that we are \nalready dealing with SDG 5 in the Gender Caucus. \nMr Ramful: Okay. \nMr François: Yes, this is why you have the Gender Caucus. \nMadam Speaker: Of course, but it is a tall order, Mr François. We hear you. Okay, \nnow next question is hon. Beejan. Yes? \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 6 – OUTDOOR CHILDREN PLAYGROUNDS – \nMAINTENANCE & SAFETY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025",
        "friday-12-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1198",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1198,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1198) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to outdoor children playgrounds \nin Constituency No. 6, he will table the list thereof, indicating in each case – \n(a) \nwhether the equipment or infrastructure thereat require maintenance or repair;  \n(b) \nwhen comprehensive maintenance work was last carried out; \n(c) \nthe measures taken or planned to ensure safety and security in terms of \ninstallation, repair, lighting and fencing, and  \n(d) \nwhether consideration is being given for the installation of a new one in St-\nFrançois and, if so, when and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I wish to point out that Constituency No. 6, Grand Baie \nand Poudre d’Or falls under the jurisdiction of two District Councils, that is, the District \nCouncil of Pamplemousses and the District Council of Rivière du Rempart. I am informed \nthat there is a total of 11 children’ playgrounds in Constituency No. 6, out of which, ten fall \nunder the aegis of the District Council of Rivière du Rempart and one under the District \nCouncil of Pamplemousses. As requested by the hon. Member, I am tabling a list of the \n\n37 \n \nchildren’ playgrounds under the responsibility of the each of the two District Councils and the \nrelevant details thereof with respect to part (a), (b) and (c) of the question. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (d) of the question, I am informed that at its meeting of \n14 October 2022, the Council of Rivière du Rempart had identified a site for the construction \nof a mini soccer pitch in the region of St François on a plot of State land of an extent of 3,600 \nm2 situated at the entrance of the road leading to Anse La Raie Youth Centre. However, I am \nnow informed that the District Councillors have now decided to set up a children playground \nthereat. Same will be taken up in the next council meeting scheduled on 19 December 2025. \nSubsequently, a request for vesting of the said plot of land will be made to my Ministry. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, alright one question. Yes? \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Minister inform the House if \nthere is a long-term strategy for play infrastructure in my Constituency No. 6 to ensure fair \ndistribution, accessibility for children with disabilities and renewal of equipment? Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, we are considering all the children play equipment with \naccessibility to children with disabilities. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, next question, hon. Apollon! \nMAHEBOURG MARKET FAIR – PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1199",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1199,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1199) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the proposed construction of a \nMarket Fair near the Youth Centre in Mahebourg, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the District Council of Grand Port, information as to where matters stand, indicating the \nexpected completion date thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, with regard to the proposed construction of the market \nfair near youth centre in Mahebourg, I wish to inform the House that the original project has \nnot been pursued following the termination of the contractor’s contract in January 2023 and \nthe subsequent arbitration process.  \nAfter the reassessment in March 2025, it was decided not to proceed with the market \nfair on that site. Instead, Government intends to develop a multipurpose complex there, but \n\n38 \n \nthis project has been deferred to the next financial year. As for the market fair itself, it has \nalready been relocated to the Mahebourg market which has been extended to accommodate \n206 stalls. Construction works for this extension have been completed and the market fair has \nbeen operational since May 2025. Accordingly, there is no completion date for the market fair \nat the youth centre site as the project is no longer being implemented. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nMr Apollon: Thank you, Madam Speaker. The drugs problem in Mahebourg is \naffecting the youths of the locality and the construction of this gymnasium will provide more \nfacilities for our youths to practice sports. Will the hon. Minister give this project a priority \nand get the necessary clearance from the Ministry of Finance for the next year? \nMr Woochit: Sure, Madam Speaker, we will still find a solution for the next financial \nyear. As I said, it has been deferred for the next financial year. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue! \nNATIONAL CERTIFICATE OF EDUCATION EXAMINATIONS 2025 – EXTENDED \nPROGRAMME – FAILURE RATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1200",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1200,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/1200) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the \n2025 National Certificate of Education Examinations, he will state the percentage failure rate \nof the school children following the Extended Programme having sat therefor, giving the \nreasons therefor.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, the Mauritius Examinations Syndicate has \nreleased the results of the National Certificate of Education Examinations 2025 on 2 \nDecember 2025. A total of 15,047 school candidates comprising both mainstream and \nExtended Programme students were examined for the NCE examinations which were \nconducted from 22 September to 16 October 2025. Out of the 15,047 candidates, 1,460 are \nfrom the Grade 9+ Extended Programme. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to the Grade 9+, that is, the Extended Programme, I am \ninformed that only 78 out 1,460 students who were examined, met the requirements and were \n\n39 \n \nawarded the NCE. I have noted with much sadness that out of these 1,460 students, 1,382 did \nnot succeed, representing a staggering failure rate of 94.7%. \nThese students are left without any results or certificate to bank upon to pursue their \neducation afterwards. Therefore, asking these students of the Extended Programme, on the \nmission to attempt the NCE, was not fair to them. \nMadam Speaker, this year’s failure rate for the Extended Programme, unfortunately, \ndoes not come as a surprise. If we look at the previous years, the failure rate has ranged \nbetween 92-97%, demonstrating a persistent and alarming trend. It is clear, therefore, that the \nExtended Programme has failed lamentably to deliver. The previous government was well-\naware of this situation, but was driven by political pride and unwillingness to acknowledge \nthe Extended Programme’s deficiencies. They did not take the required remedial measures, \nmuch to the detriment of our students. \nMadam Speaker, let me refer to the Mid Term Evaluation of the Extended Programme \n2018-2019 by the World Bank and the Ministry of Education and Human Resource. Let me \nquote from the report – \n“At the end of primary, the majority of EP [Extended Programme] students failed to \nreach to minimum requirements in English, French and Mathematics, with most \nstudents not obtaining the minimum score of 30 required in the PSAC assessment. \nMore than half of these Extended Programme students come from low socio-economic \nbackground, from families with limited educational achievement and unstable \nfamilies.” \nThe report also refers to the curriculum which was not adapted to the needs of these \nchildren. The report highlights the need to focus on life skills and basic literacy and numeracy \nduring the foundation years and beyond. \nMadam Speaker, this is what we did when we came with the Foundation Programme \nwhich answers to the multiple needs of these children. While the self-esteem of these children \nis respected, they are being supported so that they acquire basic literacy and numeracy skills, \nlife skills and values which will help them in life. In some cases, Madam Speaker, underlying \nlearning difficulties such as dyslexia or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder may go \nundiagnosed and unsupported, further affecting performance. \n\n40 \n \nMadam Speaker, our government, since its assumption of office, has taken the decision \nthat this year’s cohort of Extended Programme having sat for the NCE Examination is the last \none. The students who have failed will not be abandoned. Government has already put in \nplace necessary support measures to ensure that they have a viable pathway for their future. \nMadam Speaker, indeed, as from January 2025, the Extended Programme was replaced \nby the Foundation Programme for Literacy, Numeracy and Skills for Grades 7, 8 and 9 \nstudents. The FPLNS is competency-based and provides a more adapted approach students \nwho are otherwise disadvantaged by the traditional academic approach.  \nAt the end of three-year Foundation Programme for Literacy, Numeracy and Skills, \nsuccessful students will be awarded a certificate, the National Foundation Certificate of \nEducation, which is pitched at Level 2 of the National Qualifications Framework. The \ncertificate will enable them to enrol on a specialised NC3 courses at MITD training centres. \nHowever, the students who do not achieve the minimum requirements of the NFCE can enrol \non a specialised NC2 courses at the MITD training centres. \nMadam Speaker, let me repeat it again, the Extended Programme has been a failure \nbecause the previous government did not recognise the different types of learners that we \nhave in the education system. And that is why it was important to provide them with different \neducational pathways that meet their needs. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Your question now! \nMr A. Duval: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Madam Speaker, the Extended Programme \nwas called at a time, in 2023, when the… \nMadam Speaker: No statement! \nMr A. Duval: It is not a statement. I will refresh the memory of the hon. Minister. It is \na crime against children, and he agrees. I want to clarify the important part of his answer that \nsays that those who have failed – the 95% who have failed – will be given vocational \ntraining. I want to clarify whether they have a guaranteed seat at the MITD or any other \nvocational training centre, as well as those children in Grade 8, the other thousands of \nchildren, who are also going to face the same difficulties today? \nMadam Speaker: Is that what you said? \n\n41 \n \nDr. Gungapersad: Yes. Rest assured, hon. Member, that students will get a seat in \nthose training centres. \nMr A. Duval: Can I ask the second question? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, second question! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, the MITD has had a bottleneck issue with lack of \ncapacity in the past before being able to take onboard the thousands of children which the \nMinister now plans. May we know from the Minister the plans that have been implemented, \nand if he can give us the numbers? Is it 12,000 children under the EP now?  How many \nchildren are now undergoing the EP and will they all be guaranteed a place? \nDr. Gungapersad: Hon. Member, apart from the MITD, it is good that you take note \nthat there will be the ITET also which will cater for the needs of these students, depending \nupon the wish of the students as to what they want to do when they reach that level. It will \ndepend on what they want to do, either at the MITD or ITET. \nMr A. Duval: And the number? \nDr. Gungapersad: I cannot give you the number at this level. \nMadam Speaker: Not immediately. \nMr A. Duval: May I clarify? The number of children currently in Grade 8 and the \n1,500. The total that are in the Extended Programme that will be doing their NCE exams \nunder the old system. \nDr. Gungapersad: From memory, I can tell you it is around 2,000 per year. They seek \nadmission in those centres, but Grade 8 has the possibility to continue with the Foundation \nProgramme next year. That is, in Grade 9, they are continuing with the Foundation \nProgramme whereby they are being prepared in skills development so that after one year, that \nis, after Grade 9, they will apply for either MITD or ITET. \nMadam Speaker: When you say skills, do you also include life skills? \nDr. Gungapersad: Yes, one of the components of the Foundation Programme, Madam \nSpeaker, is life skills. \n\n42 \n \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Yes, hon. Beechook! \nMr Beechook: Madame la présidente, I wish to congratulate the Minister for having \nreplaced cette boucherie, cet abattoir qui était l’Extended Programme. \nIn line with the answer by the Minister, I wish to know what is being envisaged to \ntackle what is considered as the backward socio-economic factors that are affecting the \neducation of the kids? Secondly, is there any mechanism that is being put in place so that we \ncan detect the learning disabilities earlier instead of waiting for the NCE exams? \nDr. Gungapersad: I referred earlier to the Mid Term Report on Extended Programme, \nand that is what the previous government did not do, hon. Member. One of the requirements \nwas to involve parents in the education of their children. Secondly, they said it is important to \nhave a curriculum which is adapted to their needs. Thirdly, they said it is important to have \nproper teacher training in order to provide proper education for the students. Fourthly, they \nasked to review the class size. So, all these things are being taken care of with these kids \nnow. \nMadam Speaker: Ok, Monsieur Beechook? Very good question! \nIf I am not mistaken, hon. Apollon! \nPUBLIC SCHOOLS (CLOSED) – DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1201",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1201,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/1201) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the public \nschools, he will give the list thereof which are currently closed and those which will not be \nenrolling students for the 2026 intake, indicating in each case, the project, if any, earmarked \nfor implementation thereat.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, I am informed that there are 17 public schools, 11 \nprimary schools and six secondary schools, which have been closed down as from 2002 \nonwards. I am tabling a list thereof. \nOut of the 17 schools, the following four schools which have been closed after the \nAcademic Year 2025 will not be enrolling students for the 2026 intake – \n\n43 \n \n(i) \nRiche en Eau Government School where we have only 19 students, including \neight Special Education Needs students; \n(ii) \nMarcel Cabon SSS where there are only 97 students; \n(iii) Sebastopol SSS where there are only 105 students, and  \n(iv) Port-Louis North SSS where we have 165 students. \nThe students concerned have been relocated to neighbouring schools. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that most of the closed schools have been \nconverted into Mauritius Institute of Training and Development Training Centres and SEN \nschools, as indicated in the table being laid.  \nAdditionally, the Economic Development Board (EDB) has requested my Ministry to \nsubmit the list of Government Schools which have been closed and which are currently \nunused. The EDB intends to assess the suitability of these unused buildings for conversion \ninto revenue generating projects. The request is under consideration at the level of my \nMinistry. \nMadam Speaker: You are tabling that! \nDr. Gungapersad: Yes! \nMadam Speaker: Very good! \nYes, next question, hon. Dr. Prayag! \nBOIS MARCHAND HIGHWAY – PERMANENT BARRIERS & STREET LIGHTING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1202",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1202,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/1202) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the Bois Marchand Highway, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Road Development Authority, information \nas to whether consideration will be given for the installation of solid and permanent barriers \nalong same with a view to preventing pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists from \ndangerously crossing same, to reduce risks of fatal accidents and provision of additional \nstreet lighting along that specific stretch thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, the Road Development Authority is responsible for the \nconstruction, care, maintenance and improvement of motorways and main roads. The stretch \n\n44 \n \nof motorway M2 linking the Terre Rouge Flyover to the Calebasses interchange is a dual \ncarriage way segment that passes through the region of Bois Marchand. Along this section of \nthe motorway, the north bound carriage way runs alongside the Bois Marchand Cemetery \nwhile the south bound carriage way borders both the Cemetery and the Bois Marchand \nVillage. A pedestrian footbridge has been provided for safe crossing. The central verge, \nseparating the two carriage ways is approximately three meters wide and consist of a turf area \nwith low decorative shrubs.  \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the hon. Minister of Land Transport that a road \ncrash analysis was carried out along the stretch of motorway M2 at Bois Marchand, using the \nInternet Micro-Computer Accident Analysis Package Software. Over the past five years, a \ntotal of twelve accidents have been recorded along this section. Among those, one resulted in \na fatality, three resulted in serious injuries and twelve resulted in slight injuries. Most of the \naccidents involved pedestrians and two-wheelers. According to police reports, the accidents \noccurred mainly during dark hours and were attributed to unsafe road crossing behaviour, the \nabsence of street lighting and the lack of safety fencing along the central reservation. \nI am further informed by the RDA that from an engineering stand point, this section of \nthe motorway is equipped with adequate safeguards. However, it has been observed that some \npersons are engaged in unsafe practices by crossing the motorway illegally, despite the \navailability of pedestrian footbridge. This behaviour poses significant risk to pedestrians, \ncyclists, motorcyclists and motorists alike.  \nIn order to address the above issues, I have directed the RDA to carry out a joint site \nvisit with the Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit, the police and the relevant local \nauthorities to assess the situation on site and identify the most appropriate mitigation \nmeasures and long-term solutions. In the meantime, I requested the police to reinforce \nsurveillance and enforcement under the Road Traffic Act in the area to deter unsafe crossing \npractices. \nMadam Speaker, as regards street lighting along this stretch, the RDA has informed that \nresponsibility for street lighting on existing roads falls under the local authorities. I am \nfurther informed that as per established procedure, street lightings installed by the RDA along \nmotorways, is subsequently handed over to the relevant local authority for maintenance \nwhich is normally carried out by the CEB under an existing Memorandum of Understanding. \n\n45 \n \nI will take up the matter with my colleague the hon. Minister of Local Government so that the \nneed for further lighting along the stretch may be considered. \nMadam Speaker, the RDA also intends to progressively replace the existing street \nlighting by solar street lighting along motorway M1 from Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam \nInternational Airport to La Vigie. The project will be implemented in phases: with the first \nphase covering the section from the airport to the Gros Bois roundabout. Financial clearance \nfor phase 1 has already been sought for the replacement of the existing grid connected street \nlighting by solar street lighting. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Dr. Prayag! \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I wish to thank the hon. Minister for his \nreply. Can the hon. Minister just take into consideration the fact that many people tend to \ncross the road there, and they don’t go through accidents and this is quite a serious \nhappening, maybe it will help during the conversation with the Ministry of the Local \nGovernment? Thank you. \nMr Gunness: Madam Speaker, the hon. Member will be invited for the site meeting \nwhere there will be the police, the RDA and the TMRSU and we’ll rely on his contribution to \nsee mitigation measures. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nNow, the next question B/1203 has been withdrawn. \nNow, I will ask First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue, Ms \nSavabaddy! \nKREOL MORISIEN – SECONDARY SCHOOLS – NCE & SC EXAMINATIONS \n– EDUCATORS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1203",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1203,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/1203) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Education and Human Resource whether in regard to the Kreol Morisien, he \nwill state – \n(a)  the number of secondary schools currently offering same as a subject from Grade \n7 onwards, indicating the number of teachers thereof currently registered;  \n\n46 \n \n(b)  whether there are institutions where students sat for the Grade 9 National \nCertificate of Education Examinations or the Cambridge School Certificate \nExaminations without having a designated educator in relation thereto, and  \n(c)  whether the Ministry has recently recruited educators to teach same in secondary \nschools and, if not, whether it intends to do so.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nJOHN BRODIE STREET, BATTERIE CASSÉE – WWMA SEWERAGE NETWORK \nWORKS – TIME FRAME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1204",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1204,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/1204) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the John \nBrodie Street, in Batterie Cassée, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Waste \nWater Management Authority, information as to whether consideration will be given for \nneedful to be done for the connection to the sewerage network of households thereat which \nare not yet connected thereto and, if so, indicate the expected timeframe therefor.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, la WMA m’informe que Batterie Cassée, \nfaisant parti de Roche Bois et constitue une zone résidentielle d’environ 800 maisons dont la \nplupart sont raccordées au réseau d’égout construit en 1983. \nEn ce qui concerne la rue John Brodie, j’ai également appris qu’il y a environ 23 \nmaisons dont 16 sont raccordées au réseau d’égout et sept ne le sont pas. Pour raccorder les \nsept maisons restantes au réseau d’égout, il est nécessaire de prolonger de 105 m le réseau \nd’égout de rue. \nMadame la présidente, la WMA réalise actuellement une étude détaillée afin de \ndéterminer les exigences techniques exactes pour le raccordement des ménages concernés et \nles travaux seront mis en œuvre dans le cadre du prochain projet pour l’extension des réseaux \nd’égouts dont le début est prévu aux alentours de février 2026. \nMadam Speaker: Oui, allez-y ! \nMs Savabaddy: Merci, Madame. L’honorable ministre peut-il confirmer si des mesures \nseront prises également à Batterie Cassée pour les autres rues comme Baxipea 1 et 2 ? \nMr Assirvaden : Non, je n’ai pas ces renseignements-là. Vous m’avez posé la question \nsur la rue… \n\n47 \n \nMs Savabaddy: Ce sont les rues avoisinantes ! \nMr Assirvaden : La rue John Brodie. Donc, malheureusement, Madame la présidente, \nj’ai des renseignements que pour John Brodie et revenez avec les autres Brodie et je vais voir \nce que je peux faire. \nMs Savabaddy: … et la rue avoisinante. Merci. \nMadam Speaker : Non, sûrement vous pouvez faire ça en attendant. \nMr Assirvaden : Oui, je vais chercher certainement. \nMadam Speaker : Il faut demander, pas besoin. Elle ne pourra pas attendre l’année \nprochaine. \nMr Assirvaden : Il y a pas mal de Brodie à… \nMs Savabaddy: Parce que tu n’as rien fait … \nMadam Speaker: Mademoiselle, we do not speak from a sitting position. \n(Interruptions) \nMs Savabaddy: Hypocrite ! \nMadam Speaker: Incroyable ! Je ne peux plus rien dire moi. Tout le monde discute ; \non se bagarre, on ne se bagarre pas, enfin bref ! \nHon. Lukeeram, you will have the last question for this morning. \nMAURITIUS SPORTS COUNCIL – FOOTBALL ACADEMY – 7 TO 17 YEARS OLD \n– WAIVER OF FEES PAYABLE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1205",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1205,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/1205) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the football academy for kids \nbetween 7 to 17 years old, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nwhether consideration will be given for the waiver of the fees payable to the Mauritius Sports \nCouncil for the training sessions.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Member for this question which \ngives me an opportunity to clarify the situation regarding the use of facilities under the \npurview of the Mauritius Sports Council by football academies, especially for young people \naged 7 to 17. \n\n48 \n \nMadam Speaker, the football academies referred to in the question, are for the most part \nprivate initiatives operating independently of my Ministry. Madam Speaker, I am informed \nthat only one private academy, the Mahebourg Fire Academy, is presently making use of the \nfacilities of the Mauritius Sports Council for its training sessions. \nWith regard to the fees payable, I wish to reassure the House that the Mauritius Sports \nCouncil does not charge any rental fees at all for the training session of this academy. The \nonly cost that arises is overtime for handy workers and that applies only when the academy \nuses the ground outside normal operating hours. \nI am informed that the rate varies, depending on the grade of the officer and whether \nthe activities are held on week days or weekend. Therefore, Madam Speaker, the question of \nwaiving rental fees does not arise because there are no rental fees being charged in the first \nplace.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Lukeeram! \nMr Lukeeram: Thank you, hon. Minister. Could the hon. Minister inform the House \nwhether he would consider waiving the user fees? \nMr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, since assuming office, I have always thought to \ndemocratise access to our sports facilities. However, today in the light of the State-of-the-\nEconomy, the Ministry of Finance has opined that waiving of users’ fees will have an adverse \nimpact on revenue generating capacity and be counterproductive to fiscal consolidation. The \npayment of fees, even minimum, develop a sense of belongingness while using the sport \nfacilities and help to sensitise users towards a proper behaviour in the use of public \ninfrastructure. \nIn addition, the revenue being generated contributes towards the maintenance of the \nsports infrastructure. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Juman! Welcome back! \nMr Juman: Merci, Madame la présidente. Je peux demander à l’honorable ministre si \ndans le processus de promouvoir le football si ce n’est pas nécessaire, un must, pour \nexempter les écoles de foot de tous les frais ? Pour promouvoir le football, c’est un must ! \nMadam Speaker: Les écoles de foot ! \n\n49 \n \nMr Nagalingum: I am glad that the hon. Member asked that question because like I \njust replied, I made a demand to the Ministry of Finance but, unfortunately, with the State-of-\nthe-Economy, we cannot do that for the time being, probably the next budget, we are going to \nsee. \nMadam Speaker: Ce n’est pas lui qui décide. Vous voyez. \nHon. Members, we are going to break in a minute. May I tell you that I have been \nadvised that the following PQs have been withdrawn: B/1176, B/1208, B/1214, B/1215, \nB/1219, B/1224, B/1229, B/1232. \nNow we break. Now we can chat. Now we break until a little bit after 2.30 p.m. \nAt 1.03 p.m., the Sitting was suspended.  \nOn resuming at 2.37 p.m., with Madam Speaker on the Chair.  \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated.  \nHon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle. \nRIVIÈRE DES CRÉOLES COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE – DENTAL \nSERVICES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1206",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1206,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1206) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose \nBelle) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Rivière des \nCréoles Community Health Centre located in the Rivière des Créoles Multipurpose Complex, \nhe will state whether consideration will be given for the re-opening thereof for the provision \nof dental services at least twice a week, indicating the steps being envisaged to ensure \ncontinuity and accessibility of essential oral healthcare to those currently facing hardships \ndue to the absence of local dental facilities.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, the accessibility of oral health services is undeniably \nimportant. I am informed that the dental clinic at Rivière des Créoles was originally operating \ntwice a week, providing preventive and basic curative  oral health services including \ncheckups, extractions, fillings, scaling, hygiene advice and treatment of dental emergencies \nthat did not require referral to hospitals to inhabitants residing at Rivière des Créoles and \nsurrounding villages. However, since 06 October 2025, the dental clinic is operating only on \nThursdays. \n\n50 \n \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that this temporary measure is due to shortage \nof dental assistants and attendants averaging to 100 patients per month at the dental clinic. As \nsuch patients requiring urgent dental care such as severe pain, infection, trauma, are \nimmediately referred to the dental clinic at Mahebourg which operates on a full-time basis \nand is equipped to handle emergencies.  \nMoreover, the Ministry has already initiated actions to report 14 vacancies for dental \nassistant to the Public Service Commission. Once the recruitment exercise is completed by \nthe PSC, more dental assistants will be available at my Ministry and who will be deployed in \ndifferent dental clinics including Rivière des Créoles Dental Clinic. This will ensure that the \ndental clinic at Rivière des Créoles operates twice a week as before.  \nMadam Speaker: Hon. First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue. \nEDUCATIONAL REFORM – ABOLITION OF MIXITY/CO-EDUCATION – \nPUBLIC & PRIVATE SCHOOLS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1207",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1207,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/1207) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the \nproposed reform of the educational sector, he will state the rationale behind the decision to \nabolish mixity or co-education in public schools and whether same shall equally apply to the \nprivate sector.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, I wish to thank the hon. Member for this question \nwhich will allow me, albeit, briefly to clarify a few misunderstandings. \n At the outset, I wish to inform the House that no final decision has been taken \nregarding the abolition of mixity. The blueprint of this government will be the reflection of \nstakeholders’ input, not a single person’s decision. The merit of the forthcoming blueprint is \nbased on consultations held during les Assises de l'Éducation in April 2025 in Mauritius and \nin May in Rodrigues. The interministerial committee comprising hon. Gunness, hon. Ms \nNavarre-Marie, hon. Dr. Sukon, hon. Subron, and hon. Pentiah also went through the draft \nproposals of the forthcoming blueprint and they made valuable contributions.  \nMadam Speaker, during les Assises de l'Éducation held in April 2025 in Mauritius, \nmany stakeholders showed their concern regarding the model of mixity in academies, with \nthe exception of Mahatma Gandhi Institute. They highlighted the following – \n\n51 \n \n1. \nThe lack of consultation of the previous minister prior to taking this major \ndecision; \n2. \nThe absence of pedagogical rationale behind converting the academies into mixed \nschools as from Grade 10; \n3. \nThe adaptation and school culture issues for students transiting from regional \nsingle-gender schools from Grade 7-9 to mixed school in Grade 10; \n4. \nThe numerous discipline-related issues which emerged in these academies after \nthe transition to mixed-gender status, and \n5. \nThe drop in the relative academic performance of students in the academies. \nMadam Speaker, my Ministry is carrying on a nationwide consultation exercise from 08 \nDecember 2025 to 20 January 2026 to gauge public views on the issue of mixity and mode of \nadmission in secondary schools. I seize this opportunity to invite everyone who wishes to \ncontribute their views on mixity and the two options. Technicians of my Ministry will be \nmeeting with stakeholders and there will be an online survey as well to gauge public opinion. \nThe online survey will provide the technicians of my Ministry with valuable data, and I \nwill inform the Cabinet about the ultimate findings of this survey. Madam Speaker, we do not \nwant to rush with the blueprint. We do not want to impose anything which may affect the \nchildren of our republic. We believe in consultations with all stakeholders, and we are here to \nlisten to stakeholders. Their valuable views will be taken onboard. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Ms Savabaddy! \nMs Savabaddy: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Puis-je suggérer à l’honorable ministre \nque cette question d’abolir ou non la mixité devrait être discutée avec les parents et les \nétudiants pour obtenir leurs réactions avant d’aller de l’avant ? Et aussi, si c’est possible, \nwill the backbenchers be invited for consultations. Thank you. \nDr. Gungapersad: Yes. Regarding parents and students, it will take place in January. \nRegarding students, the School Prefect and the Student Council will be taken onboard and the \nPTA as well. That will take part in January. Regarding backbenchers, you are most welcome. \nEven backbenchers of the Opposition will be invited to share their views. \n(Interruptions) \n\n52 \n \nHe will pass on the message to the others, DPM, I hope, so that they can contribute \ntheir views. It will be online. If you want to have consultation with the technicians of the \nMinistry, you are most welcome. You are invited for that. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister, if I may. As Chairperson of the Parliamentary Gender \nCaucus, I am telling hon. Ms Savabaddy – we have just discussed with the Chief Whip –, we \nare going to take this issue onboard also because it is a very important issue concerning boys \nand girls. \n It is a very long debate. There has been a lot of research that has been done worldwide \non this issue. So, maybe we can do it also at our level. It is a very important issue. You said \nsomething about, I do not remember, but are girls doing worse or doing better in co-education \nschools? That is what we want to know. \nDr. Gungapersad: No, I did not pronounce on that. If you want, Madam Speaker, we \nnoted in academies which were formerly girl schools, when boys joined there, so far, we did \nnot have any… \nMadam Speaker: We did not have? \nDr. Gungapersad: We did not have any laureates so far. It is something which we are \nowed excellent performance, but there has discipline related issues. \nMadam Speaker: Laureate, ce n’est pas la fin du monde. \nDr. Gungapersad: Discipline related issues have been noted. We are going to discuss, \nand your valuable input is most welcome.  \nMadam Speaker: I went to a girl school. It is a very important issue. I am sure \neverybody will want to talk about it. Do you have a question, hon. Ms Savabaddy?  \nThe next question has been withdrawn.  \nFourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue, Mr A. Duval! \nDEUX FRÈRES TO ROSE-BELLE – COASTAL AREA – BUS SERVICES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1208",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1208,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/1208) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the southeastern coastal area from \nDeux Frères to Rose-Belle and/or the centre of the island through Bambous Virieux, Grand \nPort and Ferney, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land \n\n53 \n \nTransport Authority, information as to whether bus services are operational along same and, if \nnot, indicate whether consideration will be given therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMSAW – UNREGISTERED DOGS & SHELTER CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1209",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1209,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/1209) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nwhether, in regard to dogs, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius \nSociety for Animal Welfare, information as to – \n(a) \nthe estimated number thereof which are unregistered as at to date, and \n(b) \nwhere matters stand as to the proposed construction of shelters therefor.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much. Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Mauritius \nSociety for Animal Welfare that over the past two months following the coming into \noperation of section 31 (1) and 31 (3) of the Animal Welfare Act on 01 October 2025, 14,500 \ndogs have been registered which is more than double of the number of dogs registered \nthroughout the year 2024 which stood only at 6,470. \nI am further informed that the estimated number of dogs that are unregistered as at date \nis between 250,000 and 300,000. However, the House should know that the last dog \npopulation survey was carried out in 2013 by the Humane Society International. But those \nstatistics are not reliable anymore. \nIn order to obtain an accurate and up-to-date estimate of the dog population, MSAW is \ninitiating a comprehensive dog population survey using drones, for which, necessary \nclearances are being sought. This survey would provide detailed mapping of dog distribution \nin both urban and rural areas, identify dog packs and estimate population densities across \ndifferent regions. \nThe information gathered through the registration process and the population survey \nwill establish a reliable baseline for evidence-based policy making the planning of dog \ncontrol measures a strategic intervention, including the prioritisation of shelter development. \nIt will also reinforce efforts to effectively manage stray dogs’ population and support targeted \npublic awareness campaign on responsible dog ownership. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, my Ministry has initially identified land at Five \nWays, Belle Rive, for the construction of an animal hospital and dog shelters. However, \n\n54 \n \nfollowing the state visit of the hon. Prime Minister to India from 09 to 16 September 2025, a \ngrant of Rs2 billion was secured from the Government of India for the development of \nveterinary school and an animal hospital. \nConsequently, the site at Five Ways has been repurposed for the implementation of the \nproject. In parallel, the Ministry of Housing and Lands has also been requested to identify \nalternative and suitable plots of land within its jurisdiction for the establishment of dog \nshelters on a regionwide basis. The site to be identified should inter alia meet the following \ncriteria – \n• \nAvailability of essential utilities, namely water and electricity; \n• \nAccessibility to public transport with a maximum walking distance of 400m \nfrom the shelter, and  \n• \nA minimum setback of 500m from any residential area. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr A. Duval: Hon. Minister, first of all, only 5% of dogs have been registered despite \nthe panic that was created with the abrupt fine. We have spoken about that last time in the \nHouse. \nAn hon. Member: Pena panik la! \nMadam Speaker: Question! \nMr A. Duval: So, the campaign is not bearing the fruits that the Minister thought it \nwould. May I ask the Minister, for the animal shelters, how many shelters will be built and \noperated by government? \nDr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, I will not comment on the figment of imagination of the \nhon. Member. Let me impress upon him that we doing our level best despite the resources \nwhich we have. I have to congratulate our friends from MSAW who are delivering. \nNow, in relation to shelters identified, I have stated very clearly that the Ministry of \nHousing and Lands is identifying the site. We are working very closely with the Ministry of \nHousing and Lands. As matters stand, there are six existing sites. Three belong to the private \nsector and three belong to MSAW. \nHaving said so, Madam Speaker, we are putting our best endeavour to make sure to \nmake things happen. Things are happening in a positive way. I would have expected our \n\n55 \n \nfriend to appreciate. I do not want to compare like with like, but he should have known what \nhappened under the previous regime. \nMr A. Duval: May I ask the hon. Minister… \nMadam Speaker: Question! Question! \nMr A. Duval: Yes, question! Twenty were promised. Now, we are talking about six. \nMay I ask the hon. Minister, with regard to the registration again, the fees, which were a \ndisaster, have been brough down from Rs500 to Rs350. The fact that there was only one \nregistration centre and is now being devolved around the island, which should have been \ndone at the outset. \nAn hon. Member: Question! \nMr A. Duval: All of that, Madam Speaker, therefore, equates… \nMadam Speaker: You are not listening to whatever I have said before.  \nMr A. Duval: Will the hon. Minister… \nMadam Speaker: Put your question! \nMr A. Duval: Will the hon. Minister agree that the disastrous start of his campaign has \nled to these disastrous figures of 5% ... \n(Interruptions) \n… after two months of having panicked the island, people taking their dogs on public \ntransport… \nMadam Speaker: You are still putting a question?  That long your question? \nMr A. Duval: The question has been put. Yes! \nMadam Speaker, other Members have been making statements… \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Now, he is judging your … \nMr A. Duval: … and you did not stop them. \nMadam Speaker: I do not see the others? \nMr A. Duval: You do not see!  \nMadam Speaker: Are you again?  \nMr A. Duval: You do not see! I think that is… \n\n56 \n \nMadam Speaker: Are you once more saying that I only see one side? Are you once \nmore criticising me? \nMr A. Duval: If I may, Madam Speaker, you said you did not see. I merely repeated \nwhat you said. \nMadam Speaker: If I do not see… \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Twa kinn … \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Deputy Prime Minister, please!  \nMr A. Duval: Yes, stop him! \nMadam Speaker: Let me deal with this. \nIf I do not see and I do not hear, what I want you to say now in this House: are you \nsaying that I am not independent? \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, you said you did not see! I repeated that indeed you did \nnot see. You said it. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Fer foutan ! \nHon. Etwareea: Sit down boy! \nMr A. Duval: Ki foutan? \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Foutan… Imbécile! \nMr A. Duval: Twa to pa fer foutan twa? \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister, do you want to reply? \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Imbécile! \nMr A. Duval: Twa zis to lavwa ki marse. \n(Interruptions) \nMr Bhagwan: Sa 2-3 zour to ti laba la… \nDr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, the hon. Member is a losing consent and he deserves to \nbe treated with contempt. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Kot li’nn tir pasians pou tou sa letan la ? \n\n57 \n \nMadam Speaker: I know, I know. I have not up to now done any case of contempt – \nthe hon. Attorney General is not here –, including members of the press. I am being patient. I \nsaid, I would be independent. If people do not like the way I do it, I cannot do anything about \nit. \nBut I do not want to tolerate anybody doing loads of explanations. I can understand that \nyou have to do a little bit but not that much. So, try and control yourself. \nMr A. Duval: May I, Madam Speaker, since it is directed … \nAn hon. Member: No! \nMadam Speaker: No, you cannot question my ruling and what I said. \nMr A. Duval: I am not questioning. You said last time that if I had any issue to raise… \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Get sa malelve la! Malelve! \nAn hon. Member: Respect the Chair! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: You are talking in a sitting position. So was hon. Ms Savabaddy \nearlier on and I have told her, but you did not hear me. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, may I? Since you asked last time to raise issues when \nthey do arise. \nMadam Speaker, my point being that other Members do make long statements. My \nstatement was necessary, in my opinion, to give a certain… \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, on a point of order. He can’t go on like \nthat! I take a point of order.  \nMadam Speaker: You sit down!  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Sit down! Asize do bourik!  \n(Interruptions) \nMr Bhagwan: Asize! Camaron! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Deputy Prime Minister! Honestly, I am convinced that the hon. \nMember understands exactly what is going on… \n\n58 \n \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Yes! \nMadam Speaker: …and he is cultivating this way… \n(Interruptions) \nIf you, on this side, you start getting into that game, it will never end. Let me deal with \nit.  \nYou better keep quiet for the moment. You have asked your question, the hon. Minister \nhas replied.  \nYou have replied to the last question? \nDr. Boolell: Yes. \nMadam Speaker: So, that is it. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: No, Madam Speaker, I want to take a point of order. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: We do not object to him introducing a supplementary \nquestion, but he makes it a point to use provocative, insulting words every time he starts with \na supplementary question. I think you should rule that out. \nMr A. Duval: Since when? Since when? \nMadam Speaker: I do not want you to speak from a sitting position. This is the third \ntime I am saying it. He is not the only one who does this by the way, and I… \nThis is the last sitting. This is the last … \nMr A. Duval: May I, Madam Speaker? \nMadam Speaker: Let me speak! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister:  Imbécile! Bachara! \nMr A. Duval: This he can say! This he can say! He can treat me of these words and \nyou do not hear!  \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: He is always provoking, Madam Speaker! \nMr A. Duval: And then, you are asking me if you are being one-sided? He can insult \nme like this and you will not interact? You will not intervene? \nMadam Speaker: And you keep sitting… \n\n59 \n \n(Interruptions) \nBoth of you… \nMr A. Duval: How can that be? \nAn hon. Member: He raised the question of point of order! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: I am going to raise the Sitting. I have had it. I am raising the Sitting. \nYou sort it out between yourselves. \nAt 2.56 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 3.10 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: I am going to just call the next question. \nIf anybody will speak from a sitting position, I will raise again. \nHon. Dr. Ms Thannoo, please! Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka. \nELECTRICITY DEMAND – PEAK SUMMER SEASON – SOLAR SYSTEM KITS \nPROFIT CEILING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1210",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1210,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/1210) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the impending \nincrease in demand for electricity during the peak summer season, he will state if his Ministry \nwill consider imposing a profit ceiling on solar system kits aiming at encouraging investment \ntherein to reduce reliance on the national grid.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, la sécurité énergétique de l’approvisionnement \nen électricité demeure une priorité absolue pour ce gouvernement au même titre que la \npromotion des énergies renouvelables. \nL’intégration d’installations solaires photovoltaïques constitue un élément essentiel de \nnotre stratégie de décarbonation visant à atteindre 60% des énergies renouvelables d’ici 2035. \nJe suis informé, Madame la présidente, que l’imposition d’un plafond de profit – d’un cap – \nsur les kits photovoltaïques nécessite une analyse détaillée du marché, de la qualité des kits \nphotovoltaïques et surtout de l’efficience de ces appareils. Nous devons d’abord nous efforcer \nde mettre en place un système de standard qu’on n’a pas pour l’instant, des installateurs \nphotovoltaïques, parce qu’on en trouve un peu partout, on a pas mal de complaintes aussi et \n\n60 \n \nd’établir des normes minimales de performance énergétique pour ces kits, qu’on n’a pas pour \nl’instant. Il est essentiel que ces normes soient pleinement conformes aux spécifications \ntechniques internationales afin de maintenir des standards de qualité élevés et de préserver \nsurtout la stabilité de notre réseau électrique, parce que des petits consommateurs ici et là \nentrent sur notre réseau et ressortent sur notre réseau et cela créé de l’instabilité sur le réseau. \nA cette fin, je peux dire que j’ai mis en place un comité composé du personnel de mon \nministère, du ministère du Commerce, du CEB, de l’EEMO, l’Agence mauricienne d’énergie \nrenouvelable, de la MARENA, de la gestion de l’efficacité énergétique afin d’étudier la \npossibilité pour un plafond de profits comme précisé dans la question de l’honorable membre \nsur les kits photovoltaïques dans le but d’encourager l’investissement dans ce secteur et de \nréduire la dépendance au réseau électrique national. Je voudrais préciser que personnellement \nje n’ai pas d’opinion arrêtée sur la question en ce qui concerne un plafond où libéraliser le \nmarché.  \nMais, Madame la présidente, avec votre permission, je souhaite informer la Chambre \nque j’ai l’intention prochainement de demander au Cabinet la permission de présenter un \nprojet de loi dédié aux énergies renouvelables. Il est grand temps à mon avis, Madame la \nprésidente, de mettre de l’ordre dans ce secteur. On l’a fait de façon amateure jusqu’ici, ici et \nlà, essayant pick and choose dans ce secteur. De plus, il y a eu des retards accumulés qui nous \nmettent dans cette situation où on est aujourd’hui et nous avons aussi – il faut bien le préciser \n– sur beaucoup de toits, un vrai bazar. Je crois profondément au développement des énergies \nrenouvelables et nos objectifs, comme je l’ai dit un peu plus tôt de 60%, mais ce \ndéveloppement doit se faire dans la discipline selon un cadre approprié et transparent. Nous \nle voyons chaque jour sur les réseaux, circulent des publicités encourageant le public à \ns’équiper en kit solar, alors même que certaines installations se font actuellement sans passer \nni par le CEB, ni par les autorités compétentes.  \nOn a déjà la MARENA, on a EEMO qui est pour l’efficience énergétique, mais nous ne \nsavons pas combien de kits sont installés, combien de batteries sont installées, ou s’ils sont \nconnectés au réseau. C’est un peu le désordre. Il existe même des maisons – c’est bien de le \ndire – produisant leur propre électricité, stockant leur propre énergie dans des batteries hors \nde tout contrôle du système du CEB. Donc, ce n’est pas soutenable. Cela peut causer, on me \nl’a dit et je l’ai confirmé aussi – des dysfonctionnements sur le réseau, mettant en danger la \nvie de certaines personnes. C’est pourquoi il est indispensable de venir encadrer clairement \n\n61 \n \nles Home Solar Projects comme on dit dans le jargon, l’agri-solar et les autres, ainsi que \nl’ensemble des initiatives du secteur privé. Voilà. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Ms Thannoo do you have a question? \nDr. Ms Thannoo: Thank you. Are we going to have study about to what extent people \nare endangered when they are putting solar kits in their homes because at the end of the day, \nthey are being self-reliant? Thank you. \n(Interruptions) \nI am sorry, I apologise. I think people are very much worried about the safety but they \nknow that by investing in solar kits, they are doing the utmost to save energy and promote \nrenewable energy. So, there is a lack of clarity about it at the moment. Thank you. \nMr Assirvaden: Je pense que l’honorable membre a raison. Certaines personnes \nmanquent d’information. Nous poussons vers l’énergie renouvelable, nous voulons \nl’efficacité énergétique, mais l’encadrement n’est pas là. Le cadre légal n’est pas là. Bien \nsouvent, les gens du CEB ont à intervenir sur des maisons, et c’est à ce moment-là qu’ils \napprennent qu’il y a un solar kit sur la maison ou que cette maison est équipée de batteries. Je \npense qu’avec le projet de loi qu’on amènera bientôt et le comité que j’ai en mis en place, à \nce moment-là on pourra décider si on peut contrôler les profits. Mais, d’abord, il faudra que \nles standards soient sur place, que les installateurs soient formés, que les kits soient selon les \nstandards internationaux. Donc, à ce moment-là on pourra aller dans cette direction. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, Monsieur Beechook! \nMr Beechook: Merci, Madame la présidente. Est-ce que l’honorable ministre, dans le \ncadre de ce projet de loi, pourrait confirmer à la Chambre s’il y a la possibilité pour que son \nministère mette en place un système de recyclage de ces batteries qui accompagnent les solar \nkits utilisés en ce moment, qui sont très toxiques ? Voilà. \nMr Assirvaden: Je vais dire que la MARENA et l’EEMO travaillent sur ce projet. \nDisons que les batteries que nous avons mis en place jusqu’ici ce sont des batteries de 10 ans, \nde 12 ans. Ce sont des batteries qui ne sont arrivées à la fin de leur cycle pour l’instant. C’est \nsûr que ce problème au fil des années, si nous arrivons à avoir 60% d’énergie renouvelable et \nque les maisons sont équipées de ces batteries-là, éventuellement cela causera un problème \ndans le temps. Mais, je pense que les institutions de mon ministère, que ce soit MARENA ou \nl’EEMO travaillent sur ce schéma parce que nous avons des projets dans le temps que nous \n\n62 \n \navons mis en place. Les frigidaires à la casse, on voulait pour l’efficience énergétique faire \nchanger les frigidaires de la majeure partie des personnes parce que les frigidaires \nconsomment énormément d’énergie, mais c’est sûr que le souci de recyclage des batteries va \nêtre aussi dans le mandat de la MARENA et de l’EEMO. \nMadam Speaker: Monsieur Rookny! \nMr Rookny: Thank you, Madam Speaker, could the Minister advise the House if he \nintends to require off-grid users that have nothing to do with the CEB, that are not even \nconnected to the grid to be also regulated by authorities under his Ministry? \nMr Assirvaden: Oui, impérativement parce que le danger est où ? Le danger c’est que \nnous si n’avons pas un data spécifique de qui sont ceux qui ont une batterie à la maison, mais \ndemain l’ingénieur du CEB travaille sur la ligne qui est soi-disant off et l’énergie chez un \nparticulier peut retourner sur la ligne, créant un danger. Donc, les travailleurs et l’utilisateur \npeuvent être en danger à tout moment. Donc, le projet de loi qu’on discutera dans la Chambre \nici va essayer de brasser assez large. Je peux dire qu’en Inde, en Allemagne, au Portugal, en \nEspagne nous avons déjà des projets de loi de genre. Par exemple, en France il y a la loi \nAPER qui effectivement englobe un petit peu la batterie, le standard, les installateurs et le \nprix, le profit et un peu tout ça. Donc, nous travaillons dans cette direction. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, okay. Very interesting but especially people must understand \nwhat is going on because it is not very easy to understand, alright?  \nHon. Second Member for Savanne and Black River, Mr Jugurnauth! \nBUILDING LAND AND USE PERMITS – APPLICATIONS RECEIVED & \nREJECTED – QUANTUM OF FINE REVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1211",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1211,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1211) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Building Land and Use \nPermits 1, 2, and 3, respectively, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Savanne and Black River District \nCouncil, information as to the number of applications therefor received since July \n2024 to October 2025, indicating the number of – \n(i) \napplications rejected and the number thereof objected to or delayed by the \nLand Drainage Authority, Forestry Services, Water Resources Unit and/or \nother relevant authorities, and  \n\n63 \n \n(ii) \npermits issued with compliance notice (fined Rs 50,000), and  \n(b) \nstate whether consideration will be given for a review of the quantum of the fine \nimposed.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to inform \nthe House that Building Land and Use Permits (BLP) are in three categories, namely – \n• \nBLP 1 which relates to residential developments; \n• \nBLP 2 concerns the excision of land, including the sales or donation of a lot and \nthe subdivision of land among heirs, and \n• \nBLP 3 pertains to economic activities, micro and small enterprises, residential \ndevelopments as from ground plus four level and places of public worship among \nothers. \nAs regards part (a)(i) and (ii) of the question, the information is being tabled. With \nregard to part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that in accordance with section \n127A(5)(a) of the Local Government Act 2011, as subsequently amended, a fixed penalty fee \nof Rs50,000 is levied on an applicant when a Building and Land Use Permit Application is \napproved following the issuance of a compliance notice by a local authority. In the context of \nthe Local Government reform, the fine of Rs50,000 will be reviewed. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, your first question? \nMr Jugurnauth: Madam Speaker, is the Minister aware that in many cases, it takes \nyears for a BLUP? There is a lot of delay along with the LDA, etc., which is not necessary. \nCan the Minister inform the House whether he will take actions? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Minister! \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that the following \nstakeholders do not access the NELS, that is, the Traffic Management Road Safety Unit, the \nRDA, the Irrigation Authority, the LDA, and the Forestry Service. So, when all these \ninstitutions will be on NELS, it will be much easier to have it approved. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \n\n64 \n \nMr Jugurnauth: Madam Speaker, can the Minister inform the House on the gap of \ntime for the Land Drainage Authority and the Forestry officers to reply? \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, it all depends on the Ministry’s staff, but I think they \nhave a lapse of two weeks to reply before it is being approved. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Hon. Beechook! \nMr Beechook: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I would like to ask the Minister if he is \nsatisfied with the very blanket decision which is applied by the LDA of either to approve or \nto not to approve a construction? Is he satisfied with this approach or does he intend to \nrequest the engineers of the LDA to provide alternative solutions to BLUPs? \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I will have to find these answers with the LDA, and \nthen I can give a prompt answer to the hon. Member because I do not have it right now. \nMadam Speaker: Il va se renseigner. On est d’accord avec ça. On continue. \nHon. Ramdass! \nFERNEY PLAISANCE LINK ROAD – STREET LIGHTING – INSTALLATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1212",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1212,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/1212) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the Ferney Plaisance Link \nRoad, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether consideration \nwill be given for the installation of adequate street lighting along same for the safety of the \nroad users thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, the Ferney Plaisance Link Road, also known as the \nSouth Eastern Highway (A15), is an existing road of approximately 6.2 km, constructed in \n2005 to engineering standards. It links the Plaine Magnien-Mahebourg (A12) Road at Plaine \nMagnien, the Cent Gaulettes (B7) Road at Grand Bel Air and the Flacq-Mahebourg (B28) \nRoad at Rivière des Créoles. \nI am informed by the Road Development Authority that street lighting has been \nprovided at the roundabouts at Grand Bel Air and Rivière des Créoles. However, no street \nlighting has been installed at the Solitude roundabout at Plaine Magnien, which is near the \nairport, as recommended by the Department of Civil Aviation. \n\n65 \n \nMadam Speaker, as I have explained in my previous reply to PQ B/196 on 18 March \n2025, the provision and maintenance of street lighting along existing roads fall under the \nresponsibility of the local authorities. The RDA provides street lighting only along new road \nprojects and hands over the facilities to the relevant local authority upon completion.  \nIn this connection, the District Council of Grand Port has informed that it has no \nobjection to the implementation of street lighting along the Ferney Plaisance Link Road, \nsubject to the availability of funds and after obtaining the views of the Department of Civil \nAviation regarding the permissible height to lighting poles. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, you are alright?  \nNext question, hon. Dr. Prayag! \nMILLE & MEMOIRE BEACHES, POSTE LA FAYETTE – TOILETS & \nBATHROOM FACILITIES – CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1213",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1213,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/1213) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in \nregard to Mille Beach and Memoire Beach, in Poste La Fayette, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Beach Authority, information as to whether consideration will be \ngiven for the construction and provision of public toilets and bathroom facilities thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Bhagwan: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Beach Authority that Mille \nBeach, of an extent of 2.13 hectares and a sea frontage of 350 m, was proclaimed in \nNovember 1990 as Roches Noires Public Beach. There is currently no toilet block due to the \ntopography of the site and the high-water table. \nMadam Speaker, the lagoon of Roches Noires is classified as a dangerous bathing area \nand is considered unsafe for recreational swimming. There are two ‘dangerous bathing’ \nwarning signages on the beach.  \nWith regard to amenities, same are being considered and implementation will depend \non availability of funds. \nMadam Speaker, as regards Memoire Beach, I wish to inform the House that the beach \nwas proclaimed as Poste La Fayette (near Memorial) Public Beach in January 1991 and is of \n\n66 \n \nan extent of 7.740 hectares, with a sea frontage of 620 m. There is an existing toilet block \nwhich is fully operational. It is to be noted that the lagoon thereat is also classified as a \ndangerous area for recreational swimming. There is a ‘dangerous bathing’ warning signage at \nthe said beach. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that the Beach Authority is presently \nworking on a beach management plan for the Poste La Fayette Public Beach. The preparation \nof a masterplan is being finalised and provision will be made for amenities. MPs of the \nconstituency will be informed of the plan before it is operational. \nMadam Speaker: Dr. Prayag, are you okay? \nNow, I have two questions withdrawn: PQs B/1214 and B/1215.  \nSo, we go to hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues, Mr Edouard! \nNORTH REGION BUS ROUTES – COVERED SHELTERS INSTALLATION – \nWORKS SCHEDULE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1214",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1214,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/1214) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand'Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether in regard to the bus routes along Poudre d’Or \nVillage, Goodlands, Roche Terre, Grand Gaube, St-François, Calodyne, Cap Malheureux, \nVale, Petit Raffray, Fond Du Sac, Grand Bay, and Pointe aux Cannoniers, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to whether consideration is being or will be given \nfor the installation of covered shelters along same and, if so, indicate the priority sites \nearmarked and expected commencement and completion dates of works therefor and, if not, \nwhy not, indicating the proposed alternative options to sheltering the waiting commuters \nagainst weather vagaries.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBASSIN ROAD, QUATRE BORNES – BUS SERVICE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1215",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1215,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/1215) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the bus route along Bassin Road, \nin Quatre Bornes, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land \n\n67 \n \nTransport Authority, information as to the number of buses currently deployed on same, \nindicating the frequency of service during peak and off-peak hours.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCOMPREHENSIVE SEXUALITY EDUCATION – IMPLEMENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1216",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1216,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/1216) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nEducation and Human Resource whether, in regard to the Comprehensive Sexuality \nEducation, he will state where matters stand as to the implementation thereof in schools in \nmainland Mauritius and Rodrigues Island, respectively, indicating whether the issue of the \nshortage of dedicated staff to teach same is being addressed.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, I am informed that elements of Comprehensive \nSexuality Education (CSE) are already embedded within the primary and secondary \ncurriculum frameworks in both Mauritius and Rodrigues. Mauritius is also signatory to the \nEastern and Southern Africa (ESA) Commitment, which reaffirms our obligation to provide \ncomprehensive sexuality education to adolescents and young people.  \nAt the primary level, components of sexuality education are integrated into the health \nand physical education syllabus for Grades 5 and 6, with further aspects covered on the life \nskills education. These initiatives aim at promoting balanced development, healthy attitudes \nand responsible citizenship among pupils.  \nAt the secondary school level, a programme on social and emotional well-being, also \nreferred to as Éducation à l’affectivité et à la sexualité, is being implemented since 2018 for \nGrade 7 and has subsequently been extended to Grades 8 and 9. The programme addresses \nthemes such as identity, body image, gender roles, sexual development, reproductive health, \nrelationships and intimacy.  \nI am also being informed that, since 2017, more than 500 Educators have been trained \nby SeDEC for the effective delivery of EAS Programme. Training for Educators of secondary \nschools is an ongoing process. \nTo support effective classroom implementation, pedagogical materials such as teacher \nmanuals and student manuals, Mystère à la Vie, have been made available for Grade 7 and \nGrade 8 since 2019. I wish to reassure the hon. Member that the same curriculum and support \n\n68 \n \nmaterials applicable in mainland Mauritius are also extended to Rodrigues, and \nimplementation follow the same structure at both primary and secondary schools. \nMadam Speaker, there is no shortage of dedicated staff as CSE is delivered across the \ncurriculum rather than by a single specialised cadre. Educators teaching health and physical \neducation, biology, integrated science, life skills and related subjects already cover \ncomponents of sexuality education. As I have already stated, continuous training is being \nprovided to educators, and my Ministry is addressing any gap through capacity building \ninitiatives, refresher sessions and the inclusion of CSE content in pre-service teacher training \nto ensure the availability of trained personnel. \nMadam Speaker, my Ministry remains firmly committed to strengthening \nComprehensive Sexuality Education in all schools in the Republic of Mauritius in line with \nour national and international commitments. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister. Yes, hon. Edouard! \nMr Edouard: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Thank you, hon. Minister. Can the hon. \nMinister inform the House how many among these 500 teachers who have been trained are \nfrom Rodrigues? \nDr. Gungapersad: I don’t have the exact figure how many are for Rodrigues. I may \ngive you the figure afterwards. \nMadam Speaker: From or for? \nMr Edouard: From! \nMadam Speaker: From! \nDr. Gungapersad: Out of the 500, he wants how many are from Rodrigues. \nMadam Speaker: From Rodrigues, yes! \nOkay, next question, Mr Lukeeram. \nHSC 2024 – ADDITIONAL SCHOLARSHIPS – BENEFICIARIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1217",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1217,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/1217) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the Scholarship \nScheme, he will state whether Government intends to award additional scholarships \n\n69 \n \nthereunder based on the social merit criteria to eligible candidates of the Cambridge Higher \nSchool Certificate Examinations 2024 considering that the academic year is drawing to a \nclose and, if so, indicate the expected timeline for the – \n(a)  publication of the list of beneficiaries, and  \n(b)  effective allocation and disbursement of the bursaries.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, I wish to thank the hon. Member for this question, \nwhich thanks to him, has had a very happy outcome. Why? I wish to inform the House that, \nas in previous years, my Ministry has proceeded with the award of the 24 additional \nscholarships to eligible candidates of the Cambridge Higher School Certificate Examinations \n2024 based on both academic merit and social criteria. Under the scheme, 16 scholarships are \nawarded to students who meet the academic criteria and whose total monthly parental income \ndoes not exceed Rs30,000 in the aggregate and 8 scholarships are awarded to students who \nmeet the academic criteria and whose total monthly parental income does not exceed \nRs18,500 in the aggregate. \nMadam Speaker, regarding part (a) of the question, the publication of the list of \nbeneficiaries has been made public today. A press communique has already been issued in \nthat sense. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, the allocation and disbursement of bursaries will \nfollow immediately after the publication of the beneficiaries of the scholarships. \nMadam Speaker, allow me on behalf of everyone present here to congratulate all those \n24 scholarship winners, their families, their teachers and their schools. Well done to all of \nthem. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. I was listening. \nMr Lukeeram, you are okay? Right. \nNow, I have hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River! \nNot forgetting you now! \n \n \n\n70 \n \nBLACK RIVER DISTRICT – TEMPORARY MARKET FAIR",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1218",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1218,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1218) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Black River District, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a)  the number of markets in operation thereat, if any, and  \n(b)  whether consideration will be given for the – \n(i)  \nconstruction of a new market on the west coast and issue permits in relation \nthereto, and  \n(ii)  search for a private partnership to start the operation of a temporary market \non Saturdays or Sundays thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I am informed that there is presently no market in \noperation within the administrative area of the Black River District Council. A plot of land \nhas already been identified at Bambous near Winners and vested into the District Council of \nBlack River in July 2024. The preliminary design has been finalised and a quantity surveyor \nwill be appointed to prepare the preliminary cost estimate. In this financial year, an amount of \nRs1 million has been earmarked for payment of consultancy fees. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) (ii) of the question, I have already instructed \nthe District Council of Black River to issue an expression of interest to invite proposals for \nthe setting up of a temporary market fair pending the construction of the market fair by the \nCouncil. I also wish to highlight that in the past, Médine had tried to operate a market fair for \nvegetables but had to close down due to low customer turn out and poor accessibility as the \nsite was located far from the main road. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, Mr Babajee! \nMr Babajee: May I know from the hon. Minister as to an estimated time for when the \nmarket will be fully operated? \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the hon. Member that the proposed \nMarket Fair at Bambous, the Council will have to invite bids on design and build basis by \n\n71 \n \nApril 2026 and the contract for the construction works will be awarded by July 2026 and the \nwork may be completed by October 2027. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nAMAURY VILLAGE – BUS ROUTE NO. 222 – PROVISION OF BUS SERVICES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1219",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1219,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/1219) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to Bus Route No. 222 serving the Amaury \nVillage, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Transport Corporation, \ninformation as to whether consideration will be given for bus services to be provided along \nsame throughout the day as against the current provision of two trips per day and, if so, \nindicate the measures that will be taken in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka! \nOne question was transferred. So, now you come with B/1221! \nRAINWATER HARVESTING SYSTEM - IMPLEMENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1220",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1220,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/1220) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity whether, in \nregard to the income support scheme aimed at easing the financial burden of people aged 60 \n\n142 \n \nbut below the pension age deriving an income not exceeding Rs 10,000 or has a household \nincome of less Rs 20,000, if married, he will state the – \n(a)  number of individuals having benefitted thereunder category-wise, as at to date, \nand \n(b) \nsustainability thereof over the next financial year.",
      "answer": "Reply (The Prime Minister): This Government inherited a very precarious situation \nwith regard to the sustainability of the Basic Retirement Pension (BRP). The previous \ngovernment, in spite of warnings from several experts on the dangers ahead, completely \nturned a blind eye to the problem. This was most irresponsible and we could not let this \nsituation continue.  \nThere was an urgency to save the pension system for future generations of retirees. If \nwe had continued on the same path followed by the previous government, there would be no \npension for future elderly citizens. We, therefore, brought about the necessary reforms. \nAs a compassionate Government, we could not be insensitive to those persons relying \nmainly on the BRP for a living. \nThat is why following the gradual transition of the eligibility age for the Basic \nRetirement Pension (BRP) to 65 years as from 01 September 2025, Government has decided \nto provide a monthly Income Support of Rs10,000, including an end-of-year bonus, to \npersons reaching the age of 60 years who will no longer be eligible for the BRP, but who rely \nmainly or solely on the BRP for their livelihood. \nThe Income Support is payable to eligible individuals whose monthly income does not \nexceed Rs20,000 for a couple and Rs10,000 for a single person household. Beneficiaries of \nthe Income Support include housewives, retirees, employed and self-employed that meet the \ncriteria. \nIn addition, beneficiaries of the Basic Invalidity Pension, the Basic Widow’s Pension \nand the Invalidity Allowance who turn 60 years are not concerned by the Income Support \nsince they will continue to receive their respective pensions until they qualify for the BRP. \nAs regards part (a) of the question, I am informed by the MRA that over the period 01 \nSeptember 2025 to 04 December 2025, Rs63.8 million has been paid as Income Support, \nincluding an end-of-year bonus, to 1,803 beneficiaries comprising –  \n(a) \n455 single individuals, and \n\n143 \n \n(b) \n1,348 individuals who are married. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed by the MRA that following an \nanalysis carried out, it is forecasted that in the financial year 2026/2027, on average, 6,000 \npersons will benefit from the Income Support every month. This will represent an estimated \namount of Rs780 million in that year as Income Support. \nAs regards sustainability of our pension system, the Commission of Experts set up by \nGovernment is currently studying the issue and will make recommendation on appropriate \nreforms. \nFÉDÉRATION MAURICIENNE DE JUDO – CLUBS SEEKING AFFILIATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1221",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1221,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/1221) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to rainwater harvesting \nsystems, he will state whether, with a view to alleviating water stress that impacts on daily \nfunctioning and sanitary requirements, his Ministry will consider – \n(a)  imposing a profit ceiling thereon to increase the accessibility thereof for domestic \nusage, and  \n(b)  implementing viable schemes therefor in favour of public institutions.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Merci, Madame la présidente. Je souhaite informer l’Assemblée que \npresque chaque année durant la saison difficile, le pays est confronté à une crise d’eau qui \naffecte gravement nos ressources hydriques. Par conséquent, afin de gérer judicieusement \ncette ressource, il est nécessaire de mettre en œuvre des mesures de conservation de l’eau à \ntous les niveaux et notamment d’impliquer la population. \nMadame la présidente, afin de mobiliser davantage d’eau et d’encourager la collecte \nd’eau de pluie, un budget de R 25 millions a été prévu dans le budget 2025-2026. Les \nménages dont le revenu mensuel est inférieur à R 60 000 peuvent bénéficier d’une subvention \n\n72 \n \nde R 10 000 pour l’installation d’un système de collecte des eaux de pluie, donc rain water \nharvesting, le scheme.  \nPar ailleurs, le budget prévoit aussi la mise en œuvre d’un programme de collecte des \neaux destinées aux écoles maternelles, aux écoles spécialisées, aux établissements \nd’hébergement pour personnes âgées, aux centres communautaires, associations des femmes, \naux ONG et aux centres de loisirs.  \nPar ailleurs, mon ministère a adressé une circulaire à tous les ministères et organismes \npublics les invitant à envisager des mesures de conservation de l’eau afin de garantir la \nsécurité d’approvisionnement en eau de ces instances gouvernementales et du grand public. \nMadame la présidente, nous avons déjà au sein du ministère un comité technique \ncomposé de fonctionnaires de mon ministère, du ministère de l’environnement et de la CWA, \nde Statistics Mauritius, de la DBM. Ce comité qui a été mis en place pour examiner ce Rain \nWater Harvesting Scheme, nous allons y inclure aussi le ministère de Commerce pour \npouvoir… \n(Interruptions) \nC’était très sérieusement, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Non, ce n’est pas vous. Ce n’est pas du tout vous, M. le ministre, \nc’est juste mon téléphone qui fait des siennes. \nMr Assirvaden: Mais vous savez qu’on est obligé d’éteindre son téléphone dans la \nChambre ? L’exemple doit venir d’en haut. \nMadam Speaker: Vous avez parfaitement raison ! Mon téléphone m’a dépassé \ncomplètement. Allez-y ! \nMr Assirvaden : Je peux ? Merci.  \nAn hon. Member : There is a fine for that! \nMr Assirvaden : Ce n’est pas évident de garder son sérieux dans des circonstances \npareilles. \nMadame la présidente, en ce qui concerne la partie (a) de la question, je souhaite \ninformer la Chambre que mon ministère, en ce qui concerne la question de l’honorable \nmembre concernant le cap sur les profits, un plafond, nous allons tenir des réunions. On a \n\n73 \n \ndécidé qu’on tiendra des réunions avec le ministère des commerces en ce qui concerne le \nplafond de profit concernant le système de récupération de l’eau de pluie. Mais je dois \npréciser encore une fois c’est une question qui demande beaucoup de réflexion, de discussion \nquand même. It’s a policy decision, c’est une question en termes de contrôle des prix ou la \nlibération de certaines commodités. Donc, il faudra engager des discussions au sein du \ngouvernement, surtout avec mon collègue le ministre de la sécurité sociale. Au Cabinet, on va \nen discuter, c’est sûr. \nConcernant la partie (b) de la question, les institutions gouvernementales ont été \ninvitées à mettre en œuvre la récupération d’eau de pluie, étendre ce dispositif à l’ensemble \ndes institutions gouvernementales malheureusement nécessiterait un financement important \nactuellement indisponible et pourrait être envisagé dès que la situation financière le \npermettra. \nMadam Speaker : Je suis vraiment désolée, M. le ministre. C’était des petits enfants \nqui chantaient ‘We are the World’.  \nBon, allez on continue le travail. C’est bien quelque fois un petit rire comme ça. Alors, \nhon. Thannoo, you want to ask another question? \nMs Thannoo: Yes, please! May we include primary schools and secondary schools \nwithin the scheme, please? \nMr Assirvaden: Je crois dans ma réponse éventuellement j’ai parlé des établissements \nscolaires. Je l’ai dit, je le crois. Oui, mais si c’est nécessaire d’élargir cette panoplie d’autres \nsecteurs, on est disposé à le faire. Merci \nMadam Speaker: Très bien, merci. \nNext question, Dr. Prayag, please! \nDIABETIC PATIENTS – CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITOR DEVICES & \nINSULIN PUMPS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1222",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1222,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1222) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the decision of his Ministry not to \nproceed with the provision of Continuous Glucose Monitor Devices and Insulin Pumps to \nType-1 Diabetes Mellitus patients, he will state whether he will reconsider same and explore \n\n74 \n \nalternative modes of financing and support from Non-Governmental Organisations and \nagencies.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I wish to refer the hon. Member to my reply made to \nParliamentary Question B/559 at the Sitting of the House on 17 June 2025. As I previously \nstated at this august Assembly, the proposal to introduce Insulin Pumps and Continuous \nGlucose Monitor Devices, was neither recommended by a team of technical experts nor by \nProfessor D. Ovens, eminent diabetologist from United Kingdom.  \nRegarding alternative modes of financing and support from the Non-Governmental \nOrganisations, the question does not arise.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Prayag. \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, hon. Minister. Instead of considering Continuous Glucose \nMonitor together with Insulin Pumps, maybe the Ministry could come up with a policy just to \nconsider the Continuous Glucose Monitor and then afterwards, check for the feasibility of the \nsecond piece and not consider both together.  \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, well I am not a professional in that field but the team of \ndoctors that I have in my Ministry as well as Professor Ovens, they have openly declared that \nthis is not feasible and we should not go ahead with this.  \nAt the same time, I would like to draw the attention of the hon. Member that the Insulin \nPump is a device which is attached to the body of the patient on a 24-hour basis and tract the \nglucose level in the real time. The proposal to introduce   Insulin Pumps and Continuous \nGlucose Monitoring System was made by the former government without proper consultation \nwith the technical staff of the Ministry.  \nI am also advised on the lack of personal to support the insulin pump use and \nContinuous Glucose Monitoring who will monitor the use by children who are Type-1 \ndiabetics in schools, lack of support to cater for emergencies arising from faulty insulin \npumps, high cost involved as the insulin pump has several costs associated to it. Moreover, \ninsulin pump has to be replaced on average after four years of use and they provide a modest \nreduction in HbA1c blood test, conducted for evaluating blood-sugar level.  \nSo, because of all these reasons, I have been strongly advised by the officials of my \nMinistry and the doctors not to go ahead with this.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Prayag. \n\n75 \n \nDr. Prayag: I wish to thank the hon. Minister for the answer but again I am saying \nmaybe it is better to try different avenues where NGOs which cater for Type-1 diabetics \npatients and we don’t have to consider insulin pumps at the moment given that your Ministry \nhas deemed that it is expensive even though you can have cheaper and good quality ones in \nother countries. Maybe if we explore avenues with NGOs which have well-trained staff to \njust start with the Continuous Glucose Monitor for these 1000 young children suffering from \nType-1 diabetes.  \nMr Bachoo: It is not a question of financial help. It is clear that the Ministry does not \nwant to go ahead, unless and until, the team of doctors in my Ministry are agreeable to the \nrequest being made by the hon. Member.  \nMadam Speaker: Alright. We will just have to wait, Dr. Prayag. \nHon. Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes. \nCHILD DAY CARE CENTRE, BAIE DU TOMBEAU – ENROLLED BABIES & \nSTAFFING – REGULATIONS COMPLIANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1223",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1223,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/1223) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the Baie du \nTombeau Child Day Care Centre operating under the aegis of her Ministry, she will state – \n (a) currently, the number of \n(i)  \nbabies enrolled, and  \n(ii)  staff members employed, thereat, and  \n(b)  whether it is operating in full compliance with safety standards and, if not, why \nnot, giving details thereof.",
      "answer": "Ms Navarre-Marie: Madam Speaker, as regards part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed that the Baie du Tombeau Child Day Care Centre, operational since 2006 and \nmanaged by the National Children’s Council, has 19 babies: 9 boys and 10 girls, between the \nages of 14 weeks to 3 years, presently enrolled.  \nThe Baie du Tombeau CDCC has 11 staff members employed thereat comprising one \nAg. Officer in Charge, one Assistant Child Programme Officer, 7 qualified Child Caregivers, \none Nursery Attendant and one General Worker.  \n\n76 \n \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I wish to reassure members of this Assembly \nthat the Baie du Tombeau Child Day Care Centre is registered as per the Child Day Care \nCentres Regulations 2022 made under section 7 (2)(1) of the Children’s Act 2020 and is \ntherefore operating in compliance with the safety standards. This includes the infrastructure \nand the child to caregiver ratio.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes.  \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Cette garderie accueille des \nfamilles vulnérables. La Ministre peut-elle indiquer à la Chambre sur quel critère son \nministère a confié le Child Day Care Centre de Résidence Florida à Baie du Tombeau à une \nACPO, responsable des gros fracas… \nMadam Speaker: C’est quoi ACPO? Dis-nous.  \nMs Anquetil: ACPO, c’est Assistant Child Programme Officer. \nLa Ministre l’a indiqué tout à l’heure. J’ai entendu.  \nAlors, donc la Ministre peut-elle indiquer à la Chambre sur quel critère son ministère a \nconfié le Child Day Care Centre de Résidence Florida a Baie du Tombeau à une ACPO, \nresponsable des gros fracas dans plusieurs shelter notamment La Colombe, L’Oasis, Notre-\nDame et L’Oiseau du Paradis ? \nElle est connue pour son langage vulgaire, ses fausses allégations contre ses collègues \net des officiers de police et la falsification du Occurence Book. \nMerci.  \nMs Navarre-Marie : Madame la présidente, je ne suis pas au courant de ces faits. Mais \ntoujours est-il que la dame en question dont l’honorable membre fait référence, a été choisie \npar la NCC pour prendre en charge le Day Care Centre depuis quelques semaines déjà.  \nLaissez-moi vous dire une chose. J’ai effectué au moins deux visites à cette garderie. \nUne première visite – le 30 septembre et une deuxième visite – le 23 octobre where I took \nnote of some operational deficiencies and management gaps affecting the day-to-day running \nof the Day Care Centre.  \nAlors, complaints received on this centre were the following – \n“The Child Day Care Centre was often still closed at 07.30 hrs in the morning and \nparents had to wait whilst the opening hours are Monday-Friday from 07:30 to 17:15 \n\n77 \n \nhrs, and Saturday from 7:30 to 12:30 hrs. Parents were informed that the Day Care \nCentre was closed on Saturday due to general cleaning.” \nAlors que la garderie aurait dû être ouverte de telle heure à telle heure, donc telle n’est \npas le cas. Les parents sont avisés de venir prendre les enfants plus tôt. La crèche qui aurait \ndû être ouverte les samedis, n’est pas ouverte les samedis. Donc, il y a plusieurs deficiencies \nque j’ai notés moi-même. Par exemple, lorsque j’ai visité la crèche, la cour été jonchée des \nfeuilles mortes et d’immondices alors que le NCC payait un gardien à plein temps. \nDonc, tout cela a été note. C’est pourquoi mon ministère, en collaboration avec le \nNational Children’s Council, a organisé deux réunions. Une première réunion le 01 octobre et \nune deuxième réunion le 10 octobre. Ensuite, il y a une troisième réunion qui était présidée \npar le secrétaire du National Children’s Council où certaines décisions ont été prises.  \nLors de la première réunion – je pense que c’était lors de la première réunion qu’il a été \ndécidé que la dame en question prenne la charge de cette crèche. La dame est qualifiée. Elle \nest détentrice d’un certificat de HSC mais je ne suis pas au courant du tout, des frasques dont \nparle madame la députée.  \nSi la députée est au courant qu’il y a des telles frasques, je pense qu’étant donné qu’elle \nest membre du gouvernement, elle aurait pu venir me voir directement parce que ces \naccusations, ces frasques, comme elle le dit, pourraient mettre la vie de ces enfants-là en \ndanger. Je pense qu’en tant députée responsable, elle aurait dû venir vers moi, venir me voir, \nm’informer de la situation.  \nToujours est-il, Madame la présidente, que je vais prendre en considération les \nallégations que madame la députée a faites et je vais bien sûr prendre les mesures appropriées \npour le bien-être des enfants.    \nMadam Speaker: Vous allez enquêter ? \nMs Navarre-Marie: Je vais prendre en considération les allégations que Madame la \ndéputée a faites et je vais bien sûr prendre les mesures appropriées pour le bien-être des \nenfants. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Can I take a point of order, Madam Speaker? \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Recently, you have ruled and it is in the Standing \nOrders. A Member cannot make allegations, accusations, like we have just heard, without \n\n78 \n \nproducing evidence. Therefore, can I ask you to rule that the hon. Member should produce \nevidence about the accusations and allegations which she has made? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, I think you should do that.  \nAlso, may I add? Of course, it is a subject that I master perhaps better than all of you. \nMaybe also I should add: tell us more about the National Children Council itself.  \nYes, madame! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie. Avant de poser ma supplémentaire, je donne… \nMadam Speaker: Bien sûr. \nMs Anquetil: …par rapport à la réflexion de la ministre. Alors, Madame la \nprésidente… \nMadam Speaker: Non, non. Vous répondez d’abord au point of order. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: I have taken a point of order and you have ruled. \nMadam Speaker: There has been a point of order, and I have asked you. I have already \nruled. Il faut donner… \nMs Anquetil: Ecoutez, Madame la présidente, c’est dans les rapports de \nl’Ombudsperson for Children. Vous savez, l’Ombudsperson for Children depuis des années \német des rapports sur les shelters, et c’est clair et net. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: On the same point of order, she cannot refer to all the \nreports. Tell us what report, on what occasion. \nMadam Speaker: Which one? Which date? Where?  \nMs Anquetil: Je ne les ai pas avec moi. Mais de toute façon, à la station de Grand Baie, \non peut avoir tous les détails. Alors, ma… \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: It is not good enough. It is not good enough at all! \nMadam Speaker: Non, non. Mademoiselle, ce n’est pas possible de continuer comme \nça. C’est dommage d’ailleurs que l’opposition ne soit pas là parce qu’à chaque fois on me dit \nque je regarde juste un seul côté.  \nMoi, j’ai été Ombudsperson pendant 8 ans. Vous allez vous référer à mes rapports ? \nJ’en ai parlé de tout ça. Donc, dites-nous !  \n\n79 \n \nCe que vous avez dit à propos de cette dame, c’est probablement vrai. Mais comme on \na dit pour les membres de l’opposition, de la même manière, vous devez nous produire ce que \nvous avez dit là. Vous devez nous produire cela.  \nOn ne peut pas faire comme il y avait la fameuse question de monsieur Quirin, je me \nsouviens, ce qui avait enflammé la Chambre. On ne peut pas ! Parce que chaque semaine, \nmoi aussi je vois comment les choses se passent. C’est un sujet qui ne vous tient pas \nseulement à cœur. Ça me tient aussi à cœur.  \nAllez-y ! Donnez-nous vos documents. \nMs Anquetil: Alors, mes documents, la ministre a dit que c’est suite à deux visites \nqu’elle a effectuées en octobre et novembre. J’ai les dates aussi.  \nMs Navarre-Marie: Septembre. \nMs Anquetil: Septembre ! Voilà, exactement ! \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: That is not the point, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Oui. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: That is not the point! \nMs Anquetil: Je voudrais déposer… \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: I take the floor on a point of order, if the hon. Member \nwill sit down. She cannot now reply to the Minister without telling us. If she cannot today \nproduce the evidence, okay. But take a pledge to produce it as soon as possible. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, do that! \nMs Anquetil: Alors, tout à fait. Alors, pour répondre au point of order du…  \nMadam Speaker: Deputy Prime Minister.  \n(Interruptions) \nMs Anquetil: Je vais déposer les informations demandées. Il n’y a pas de souci à ce \nsujet. \nMadam Speaker: D’accord ! \nMs Anquetil: Je vais les déposer à la librairie de l’Assemblée nationale. Je tiens \ntoutefois à dire que malgré le changement de direction ; moi, j’ai des photos que je tiens à \ndéposer. \n\n80 \n \nMadam Speaker: Est-ce que ces photos sont authentifiées ? \nMs Anquetil: Non, qu’est-ce que vous voulez dire par authentifiées ?  \nMadam Speaker: Eh ben !  \nMs Anquetil: Ce sont des photos de la cour, Madame la présidente.  \nMadam Speaker: C’est exactement ce que j’ai fait avec l’opposition ! Mademoiselle, \nj’ai fait la même chose avec l’opposition. Soit vos photos sont authentiques, soit comment la \nministre peut savoir ? Ne venez surtout pas m’accuser – maintenant, non seulement on \nm’accuse de voir que le gouvernement, mais on m’accuse aussi de voir qu’un parti politique. \nÇa, je n’accepte pas ! Je n’accepte pas !  \nVous êtes venus me dire ; j’ai entendu tout cela, je suis fatiguée d’entendre ce genre de \ntruc. Moi, je ne joue pas à ce jeu-là. Donc, vous faites comme l’opposition. Same rules for \neverybody!  \nMr Mohamed: Madam Speaker, if I may? The issue… \nMadam Speaker: Vous allez vous aussi vous mettre de la partie ? \nMr Mohamed: Not at all! I am just only trying to help the process. \nMadam Speaker: Be careful! Be careful! \nMr Mohamed: What I am trying to do is help the process. \nMadam Speaker: Aah, well! \nMr Mohamed: What you are saying is totally true unless she took the photographs \nherself. \nMs Anquetil: That’s it! \nMadam Speaker: Okay. You took the photographs yourself? \nMs Anquetil: That’s it. Voilà ! Moi-même. Les photos ont été prises le 4 décembre \n2025. Deux photos de la cour parce que bien sûr je n’ai pas accès à l’intérieur et que je \nvoudrais déposer à l’Assemblée. \nMadam Speaker: Je pense que la ministre a dit… \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: C’est extrêmement grave. She is saying that she took the \npictures herself. \n\n81 \n \nMadam Speaker: Yes, she said. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: This must be substantiated. \nMadam Speaker: No, we have to believe her that she took the pictures herself.  \nBut laissez-moi voir les photos. Quelqu’un m’emmène les photos, s’il vous plaît ? Vous \nne savez pas ; vous êtes en train d’ouvrir la porte de sésame là. Faites bien attention.  \nAlors, est-ce que, Madame la ministre, autant que je me souvienne… \nPassez ça à la ministre. C’est dégueulasse, bien sûr. Passez ça à la ministre. \nEst-ce que vous avez vu tout ça ? Vous avez visité là-bas, Madame la ministre ?  \nOn fait un procès. On n’est pas dans une situation de questions-réponses-là. On est en \ntrain de faire un procès, l’honorable Premier ministre. \nMr Juman: Mais, Madame la ministre même a… \nMadam Speaker: Un Premier ministre… \nMs Anquetil: Elle-même elle a trouvé des maldonnes.  \nMadam Speaker: Mais voilà ! \nMs Anquetil: Elle l’a dit ! La ministre a dit qu’il y a des maldonnes là-bas ! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Mais je lui montre. Je lui montre. \n(Interruptions) \nMs Anquetil: Justement ! Je ne comprends pas. \nMadam Speaker: Il vous faut savoir ce que vous voulez dans la vie. Vous voulez \nsauver les vies des enfants ou bien vous voulez faire un procès ? \nMs Anquetil: Oui, tout à fait ! Tout à fait ! \nMadam Speaker: Ça ressemble à ce que vous avez vu, Madame la ministre ? \nMs Navarre-Marie: Oui, exactement. Ça ressemble à ce que j’avais vu lors de ma \npremière visite, c’est-à-dire le 30 septembre. Mais depuis, ça a changé. \nMadam Speaker: D’accord. \n\n82 \n \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, again, on the same point of order. We \nwould have been satisfied if the hon. Member had said ‘These are the pictures which I have \ntaken myself on a given date.’ We would have accepted her word. \nMadam Speaker: It is alright. It is alright. Now, we have sorted it out. \nMs Anquetil: Ma question supplémentaire ! \nMadam Speaker: Oui, mais n’oubliez pas que vous nous devez un document qui vient \ndu rapport de l’Ombudsperson de je ne sais pas quelle année. \nMs Anquetil: Oui. \nAlors, ma deuxième supplémentaire. Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. La \nministre est-elle au courant que, vendredi après-midi dernier, le Chairman du NCC, c’est-à-\ndire du National Children Council, s’est rendu dans cette garderie pour une réunion avec le \npersonnel au cours de laquelle il a déclaré que si des informations concernant la garderie \nvenaient à circuler, la ministre elle-même viendrait vérifier les téléphones du personnel ? \nMs Navarre-Marie: Mon Dieu ! Mon Dieu !  \nMs Anquetil: Justement ! \nMs Navarre-Marie: C’est du n’importe quoi ! \nMs Anquetil: La ministre va-t-elle ordonner… \n(Interruptions) \nMais c’est quelqu’un qui l’a dit dans la réunion ! C’est le président qui l’a dit dans la \nréunion. La ministre… \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Mademoiselle, excusez-moi ! Je ne sais pas ; je n’arrive plus à \nsuivre et à comprendre ce que nous faisons dans cette Chambre. Vous êtes en train de faire… \nVous étiez là-bas ? Vous étiez au courant ? Vous étiez au courant ? \n(Interruptions) \nMadame la ministre, vous restez tranquille, s’il vous plaît !  \nVous étiez au courant de ce qui s’est passé dans cette réunion ? Moi, je ne porte pas du \ntout le National Children Council dans mon cœur, mais vous étiez présente ? \n\n83 \n \nMs Anquetil: Non. \nMadam Speaker: Aah! \nMs Anquetil: Je n’étais pas présente ! \nMadam Speaker: Vous êtes au courant de ce qui s’est passé ? Comment êtes-vous au \ncourant ? \nMs Anquetil: Il m’a été rapporté. \nMadam Speaker: Non, non, non ! Hearsay evidence. Hearsay evidence! We are not \ngoing to have this! No hearsay evidence!  \nCe n’est pas possible ça ! Je vais vous donner un conseil d’amie, de maman. Tout \ndépend de ce qui est vraiment votre objectif en posant cette question. Là, on n’a pas \nd’opposition. Vous êtes dans un même gouvernement. Ça dépend de votre objectif. Moi, je \nvois un petit peu aussi là. Personne n’est dupe là. Personne n’est dupe ! \nMs Anquetil: Alors, mon objectif, Madame la présidente, puisque vous posez la \nquestion, c’est connu de tout le monde que j’ai un objectif clair et net : c’est la protection des \nfemmes et des enfants. Que je sois un membre de l’opposition ou du gouvernement, ma ligne \nde conduite, elle reste la même. C’est un combat pour la justice.  \nEt je suis encore plus sensible puisque cette garderie à résidence Florida à Baie du \nTombeau, ce sont des enfants issus de familles vulnérables. \nMadam Speaker: Vous êtes en train de faire un statement ! Statement! You are giving \nme a statement. \nMs Anquetil: Vous m’avez posé une question, Madame la présidente. Je peux poser… \nMadam Speaker: Non, vous me répondez que c’est ça votre objectif. \nMs Anquetil: Oui. Tout à fait. \nMadam Speaker: Allez-y ! Vous pouvez avoir un supplémentaire. \nMs Anquetil: Alors, je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. La ministre a dit dans sa \nréponse que les mesures de sécurité sont là. Très bien ! La ministre peut-elle indiquer à la \nChambre si son ministère envisage l’installation de caméras de surveillance – puisqu’il n’y en \na pas du tout dans la garderie – d’un système de fingerprint ainsi que le rehaussement du mur \n\n84 \n \nentourant le bâtiment ? Une demande qui avait été refusée sous l’ancien régime par nul autre \nque moi-même ! Merci. \nMadam Speaker: Madame la ministre, allez-y ! \nMs Navarre-Marie: Je vais transmettre le message au National Children Council’s \nBoard.  \nMadam Speaker: Mais, Madame la ministre, faites bien attention. Vous êtes ministre. \nMs Navarre-Marie: Oui. \nMadam Speaker: C’est toujours le National Children’s Council. Regardez bien ce \ntexte de loi – under the correction of the Attorney General – regardez ce qu’est le National \nChildren’s Council et quel est son rôle. \nMs Navarre-Marie : Madame la présidente, je connais parfaitement le rôle du \nNational Children's Council. Comme j’ai expliqué la dernière fois, le National Children's \nCouncil a dû prendre certaines responsabilités, vu qu’il n’y a pas d’autres organismes qui \nprennent ces responsabilités-là. C’est-à-dire, la garderie et le shelter. \nMadam Speaker : Okay. Au moins on est au courant de cela, mais il faudra peut-être \npenser plus loin. \nNext question ! Alors, nous avons fini. \nThe question B/1224 has been withdrawn. \nNATIONAL TRANSPORT CORPORATION – BUSES PURCHASED (2019-2025) – \nOPERATIONALITY & PERFORMANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1224",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1224,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/1224) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the National Transport \nCorporation, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe number of buses purchased since 2019 to date, on a yearly basis, and \n(b) \nwhether – \n(i) \nall buses thereof are operational on all routes; \n(ii) \n it intends to purchase new buses any time soon, and \n(iii) \n the different makes of buses are beneficial thereto in terms of \nperformance and, if so, give the relevant details thereof. \n\n85",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMadam Speaker: No. B/1225, donc, c’est à vous l’honorable Ms Anquetil! \nBAICHOO MADHOO GOVERNMENT SCHOOL – NEW PRE-PRIMARY \nBUILDING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1225",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1225,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/1225) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the Baichoo \nMadhoo Government School, he will state if his Ministry plans to put the new pre-primary \nbuilding, ready since 2023 in operation.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, I wish to thank the hon. Member for this question. \nI am informed that the building for the new pre-primary block of Baichoo Madhoo \nGovernment School was fully completed and handed over to the Ministry of Education by the \nthen Ministry of National infrastructure… \nMadam Speaker: Attendez, l’honorable minister! The Chief Whip is not happy. Please \nsit down. Tell us. \nMs Anquetil: Juste pour dire que je n’entends pas la réponse. Merci. \nMadam Speaker:  Oui, pourquoi vous n’entendez pas ? Dites clairement ! \nMs Anquetil: Il y a du bruit. \nMadam Speaker: Où il y a du bruit ? Dites-nous clairement ! \nVous avez peur de nous dire ? \nMs Anquetil: Non, je n’ai pas peur.  \nMadam Speaker : Mais dites-moi clairement ! \nMs Anquetil : Je viens de vous dire qu’il y a du bruit ! \nMadam Speaker : Ça vient d’où le bruit ? \nMr Mohamed: She does not know from where. \nMadam Speaker: Ah, she does not know? \nMr Mohamed: Otherwise, she would have said it. \nMadam Speaker: Mais moi je le sais. Allez-y, l’honorable ministre ! Pas une mouche \nqui vole pendant que le ministre parle. \n\n86 \n \nDr. Gungapersad: I take the answer again.  \nI wish to thank the hon. Member for this question. I am informed that the building for \nthe new pre-primary block of Baichoo Madhoo Government School was fully completed and \nhanded over to the Ministry of Education by the then Ministry of National Infrastructure and \nCommunity Development, now Ministry of National Infrastructure, on 23 November 2021. \nHowever, it is regrettable to note that from 23 November 2021 to November 2024, the \nprevious government did not take the necessary steps to make this facility operational. \nMy Ministry is presently finalising the outstanding internal arrangements required for \nthe operationalisation of the pre-primary block. These include: the provision of furniture and \nschool materials, the deployment of the required personnel and the completion of all \ncompliance checks for early childhood facilities in accordance with established standards. \nMadam Speaker, I will ensure that the new pre-primary block becomes operational as \nsoon as possible once the remaining preparative measures have been completed. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister, I heard you. Yes, questions! \nMs Anquetil: Just one please! \nMadam Speaker: Supplementary! \nMs Anquetil: One Supplementary. Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Je \nremercie l’honorable ministre pour sa réponse et l’honorable ministre prévoit-il d’effectuer \nune visite des lieux très prochainement compte tenu de l’éminence de la rentrée scolaire ? Je \nvous remercie, Madame la présidente. \nDr. Gungapersad: C’est avec plaisir que je vais le faire, je demanderais a l’honorable \ndéputé et les autres députés de la circonscription s’ils veulent venir ensemble. C’est avec \nplaisir qu’on va le faire pour s’assurer que très prochainement on commence avec ce pre-\nprimary school unit à Baichoo Madhoo Government School. \nMadam Speaker: Merci, l’honorable ministre. Yes, hon. Second Member for Quartier \nMilitaire and Moka. \n \n \n \n\n87 \n \nAGRICULTURAL LAND CONVERSIONS – FARMING & FOOD \nPRODUCTION – PRESERVATION MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1226",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1226,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/1226) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & \nMoka) asked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nwhether, in regard to agricultural land, he will state the extent thereof converted for \ncommercial and residential purposes over the period 2019 to 2024, indicating the measures \nbeing envisaged for the protection and preservation thereof for farming and food production \npurposes in the face of the urgency to ensure food security.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you, hon. Member. Madam Speaker, I am informed that the extent \nof agricultural land that has been issued with a land conversion permit for commercial and \nresidential purposes over the period 2019 to 2024 is 1568 hectares. I am tabling a list of all \nland conversion permits issued during that period.  \nI wish to draw the attention of the House that over the past years prime agricultural land \nhas indeed been depleted from the land bank earmarked for agricultural activities. As a result, \nit has become a challenge for the agricultural sector to respond to the increasing demand for \nfood production. \nMy Ministry has taken several measures to bring an equilibrium between infrastructural \ndevelopment and agricultural activities to ensure continuous food security including the \nfollowing since June 2025 – no land conversion permit is being issued for commercial or \nresidential project on prime agricultural land, such projects unless it is a project of national \ninterest will instead be directed on bare land classified as marginal. \nThis year a land suitability map of Mauritius has been developed by the Mauritius \nSugar Industry Research Institute whereby land has been classified as having high, moderate \nor low or marginal agricultural potential based on criteria such as topography of land, \nmechanisation potential and amount of rainfall. Based on this land suitability map 2025, \nlandowners will now have visibility on the type of projects that may be undertaken on the \nland.  \nIn line with PART III of the Sugar Industry Efficiency Act, as subsequently amended, \nfor all land conversion permits granted, applicants need to plough back within a period of two \nyears at least 50% of the proceeds arising from the conversion into sugar production as field \nor factory level owned to diversification within the sugar sector. They need to fully \ncompensate for loss in agricultural production by, of course, generating and the equivalent \n\n88 \n \namount of such production for at least one crop cycle of eight years by putting under \nsugarcane cultivation, other land belonging to applicants. Alternatively, they need to \nimplement projects relating to water and energy saving irrigation projects.  \nAt the level of the Ministry, since 2025, promoters converting agricultural land to \nagricultural purposes are required to provide an undertaking to carry out agricultural \nactivities. They are requested to inform my Ministry of the exact extent of land they will \nplough back and indicate the site where agricultural activities will be reinstated. They are \nrequired to work under the guidance of MCIA and the Food and Agricultural Research and \nExtension Institute in elaborating agricultural activities to be undertaken. The monitoring and \nfurther evaluation of these activities are carried out by Mauritius Cane Industry Authority and \nFAREI through regular site visits. \nFAREI has carried out extensive consultation with farmers, suppliers and other \nstakeholders, so as to develop a Precision Farming Grant Scheme to support innovative \nfarmers in adopting advanced technologies that can increase productivity while ensuring \nlong-term environmental and economic sustainability. \nMadam Speaker, other accompanying measures have been implemented to encourage \nplanters to adopt smart agricultural practices than opting for traditional modes of farming. \nEncouraging the farming community to shift to vertical farming, hydroponics, aeroponics, \naquaponics, digitally controlled climate –the light, the temperature, the humidity, the carbon \ndioxide – for indoor crop production yield in 10 times more per unit area and is also a water \nefficient system. \nPresently, the financial incentives for a planter to shift from conventional to sheltered \nfarming are – \n1. \ngrant of Rs500,000 for construction of the greenhouse and a planter can benefit \nthe Rs500,000 for a second time, and \n2. \nimported greenhouse is exempted from customs duty VAT when imported by \nplanter; \n3. \nplanters having a minimum 500 m² under hydroponic cultivation benefit duty-free \nexemption on single and double cab vehicles. \n\n89 \n \nMadam Speaker, I wish to highlight that preserving our agricultural land is not merely \nan environmental obligation but a strategic imperative for safeguarding national food security \nand ensuring the sustainable development of our country. \nThe decision we take today guided by prudence, scientific evidence and long-term \nvision will determine the resilience of our agricultural sector for generations to come. \nIt is therefore essential that all stakeholders remain committed to protecting productive \nland, promoting judicious land use and reinforcing the foundation of a self-reliant and \nsustainable Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes, hon. Dr. Ms Thannoo? \nDr. Ms Thannoo: Will the Minister kindly investigate traditional farming methods \nimplemented by the Navdanya movement, by the Rural Women’s Assembly, methods that are \nlow-tech and that ensure resilience for long-term and the protection of the land? Thank you. \nDr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Dr. for putting the question. She can rest \nassured we are not going to depart from traditions but we are going to put the premium \nnecessary to make sure that there is an outcome. Having said so, we cannot also forgo our \ninterest in relation to technology, where there is a constant breakthrough. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, of course. Yes? \nDr. Ms Thannoo: Madam Speaker, in the era of climate crisis, the only method that has \nproven to work is the method implemented by the Navdanya movement without pesticides. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nDr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, since our hon. friend is well versed, I would like to be \nenlightened and I am here to learn since we are all on the learning curve. Thank you very \nmuch. \nMadam Speaker: So sweetly said, hon. Minister. Maybe you both should meet. \n(Interruptions) \nThe same goes for all of you because questions are very interesting but getting things \ndone really is more interesting.  \nOkay, next question, hon. Caserne! \n \n\n90 \n \nPUBLIC HOSPITALS – PARKING SLOTS SHORTAGE – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1227",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1227,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1227) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to each of the public \nhospitals, he will state the – \n(a) \nnumber of parking slots available thereat, indicating the number thereof assigned \nfor public use, and  \n(b) \nmeasures being envisaged to address the shortage of parking slots thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, the number of \nparking slots available for public at the main regional hospital is as follows – \n• \nJeetoo Hospital: 8; \n• \nSir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam National Hospital: 210; \n• \nSir Anerood Jugnauth Hospital: 158; \n• \nJawaharlal Nehru Hospital, Rose Belle: 137; \n• \nVictoria Hospital: 90; \n• \nBrown Sequard: 76; \n• \nSubramania Bharati: 32; \n• \nLong Mountain: 50; \n• \nMahebourg: 54; \n• \nSouillac: 14; \n• \nNew Cancer Hospital: 24; \n• \nENT: 26. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that there is a shortage of parking \nfor the public. Measures taken are as follows – \n• \nRegion 1: At Jeetoo Hospital – Arrangements are being made for some 25 \nadditional parking slots to be available. Nevertheless, the public is being allowed \nto use vacant staff parking slots during visiting hours, that is from 6.30 to 7.00 \nhours and 15.30 to 17.00 hours; \n• \nRegion 2: Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam Hospital – In addition to the existing \nparking, a new parking behind the Catering Unit is operational since June 2025, \nproviding 40 additional parking slots for the public. Additional 15 slots have been \nprovided behind the ward which serves as parking for the public and the nursing \n\n91 \n \nstaff. Madam Speaker, a new parking area has been identified in the vicinity of \nthe hospital.  \n• \nAt Long Mountain Hospital, a new proposal for additional parking spaces is \nunder preparation in collaboration with the Ministry of National Infrastructure.  \n• \nAt Mahebourg Hospital, due to the old structure of the hospital and special \nconstraints thereat, provisions cannot be made for additional parking spaces. \n• \nRegion 5: At Victoria Hospital, there is unfortunately no space in the premises for \nadditional parking. However, the public is being allowed to use staff parking \nduring visiting hours, that is, from 6.30 to7.00 in the morning and from 15.30 to \n17.00 in the afternoon. \n• \nAt the National Cancer Centre, measures have been taken for provision of some \nadditional 40 parking for the public near the hospital. I am informed that a plot of \nland to an extent of 1,266.26 m2 has been acquired with the Ministry of Housing \nand Lands and has been vested in my Ministry for use as a parking area for the \nNational Cancer Centre.  \nThe project is in the pipeline and financial clearance is being sought to start the \nproject. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Caserne! \nMr Caserne: Thank you. Madam Speaker, may I request the hon. Minister with regard \nto Jeetoo Hospital, the number he has mentioned, that is 25, is the space already available or \nwill he have to seek for additional space for creation of additional slots of parking? \nMr Bachoo: Well, I am informed that a plot is available where 25 additional parking \nslots can be made available. So, I will have to try to find out where that plot is. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Aumeer? \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister, in the light of \nthe new Subramania Bharati, Eye Hospital whether he would make arrangements to have a \nholding area for buses which are coming daily now to drop patients and wait at times, causing \nquite a backlog on the exit route that exits from the roundabout of Moka onto the motorway? \nThank you. \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I am aware of the problem. I definitely need to get a plot \nof land for that purpose and we are going to contact the Ministry of Housing and Lands so \n\n92 \n \nthat they can help us in doing that work. I am really aware of the problem that is being \ncreated every day in the morning and even in the evening. \nMadam Speaker: Excellent. Yes, one last question! \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Could the hon. Minister consider to have a \nmulti-storeyed level parking at SSRN Hospital and even to get his Ministry to inform the \nstaff, the security guards who cater for public coming during visiting hours to say what you \nhave just said, that they are allowed during visiting hours in the hospital? Thank you. \nMr Bachoo: I have already mentioned that some 40 additional parking slots are being \nprepared, 40+15 and as the hon. Member is fully aware, in the years to come, we are going to \nhave a brand-new hospital at Seewoosagur Ramgoolam Hospital. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Now time is up. The Table has been advised that \nquestions B/1231, B/1234, B/1236 have been withdrawn. Thank you very much everyone.  \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that all the business on today’s \nOrder Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded.  \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nSTATEMENT BY MINISTER \nBAD WEATHER ALLOWANCE – REGISTERED ARTISANAL FISHERMEN  \n(4.20 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries (Dr. A. Boolell): Thank you very much, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nDr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, with your permission I wish to make a Statement on the \nissue of payment of Bad Weather Allowance to registered fishermen. I am informed that \nregistered artisanal fishermen in Mauritius are entitled to payment of Bad Weather Allowance \nof Rs800 per day. As at date, there are 2,546 registered artisanal fishermen and an amount of \naround Rs40 million is disbursed on a monthly basis as Bad Weather Allowance.  \n\n93 \n \nWith a view to ascertaining the genuineness of registered fishermen, my Ministry has \nsubmitted the list of 2,546 fishermen to the Mauritius Revenue Authority and the Central \nBusiness Registration Department. These institutions have been requested to confirm the \nnumber of fishermen who are involved in other economic activities. Section 122(e) of the \nFisheries Act provides that the supervising officer of my Ministry shall deregister a fisherman \nwhen it has been proved that he is involved in gainful employment. \nMadam Speaker, let me clearly state to the House, payment of Bad Weather Allowance \nwill be effected to compliant registered fishermen, including those holding a fish-related \nBusiness Registration Number. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you! \nPUBLIC BILLS \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Law Reform Commission Bill (No. XXXI of 2025) \nwas read a first time.   \nSecond Reading \nTHE ROAD TRAFFIC (AMENDMENT) BILL  \n(No. XXX of 2025) \nOrder for Second Reading read. \n(4.21 p.m.) \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister, take a deep breath! \nThe Minister of Land Transport (Mr Osman Mahomed): Madam Speaker, I move \nthat the Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill (No. XXX of 2025) be read a second time. \nThe Bill, Madam Speaker, relates to a very fundamental matter, that is, the preservation \nof human life and reduction of family sufferings as a result of road casualties and fatalities. \nEvery year, we publish statistics of road accidents. We see the numbers and debate the trends \nfor a while but numbers, Madam Speaker, have a way of sanitising tragedy. Behind every \nfigure in those statistics, there is a grieving mother, a father who will not see his siblings \ngrow up, a young professional whose potential and aspirations have been cut short or even a \nfamily which has been plunged into poverty because the breadwinner was taken away by a \nreckless act on our roads. \n\n94 \n \nThe number of serious injuries and fatalities on our roads have become a silent \npandemic, to repeat the words used by Jean Todt, the UN Secretary General’s Special Envoy \nfor Road Safety.  \nMadam Speaker, you had introduced Mr Todt to this House on Tuesday 08 April this \nyear as the guest of the hon. Prime Minister, Dr. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, himself a great \nproponent of road safety, who announced during his speech on the budget exercise the re-\nintroduction of the penalty point system in January 2026.  \nSo, here we are with the presentation of this Bill less than five months later with a \npenalty point system which is different from the first version of 2013, in terms of the broader \nspectrum of offences it covers, the use of technology, the innovative redemption of points \nfacility, several amendments to other sections of the Road Traffic Act, and many others with, \nhowever, the overarching objective remaining the same, that is, change in psychology of \ndriving – a simple universal principle! \nDriving is a privilege and not a right. If you abuse of that privilege, you will lose it!  \nI see on the list of orators today that the Leader of the Opposition will intervene on this \nBill and I can sense it, amongst others, that he will surely put forth the argument that there \nhas not been any consultation thereon, maybe. \nMadam Speaker, I have personally communicated… \nMadam Speaker: Don’t pre-empt what he is going to say. Give him a chance! \nMr Osman Mahomed: During the PNQ, he had questioned about it. \nMadam Speaker: Don’t say! \nMr Osman Mahomed: I have personally communicated and provided a lot of \nexplanatory information on the Bill outside the House, in the press and so have many of my \nhon. colleagues, to whom I am thankful.  \nThe Bill has come for Second Reading today after 12 days from the date it was \npublished on the website of the National Assembly, that is, on Friday 28 November 2025. So, \nample time was given during which I had even invited one and all to make their views known \n\n95 \n \neither by writing to my Ministry or to let their views be heard in this House through their \nelected representatives.  \nDuring the period 10 March 2013 to 27 July 2015, the Penalty Points System brought \nabout evidence-based results as the number of fatalities on the road had dropped by 13% to \n137. There were indeed 158 fatalities in 2010, 152 in 2011 and 156 in 2012.  \nThe provisions relating to the Cumulative Road Traffic Offence (CRTO) were amended \na first time in 2018 and again a second time in 2023 to reduce the number of offences leading \nto disqualification of a driver’s licence from an initial 6 offences to 5 offences in 2018 and \nsubsequently to 4 offences in 2023 because the CRTO was not giving the desired results. \nStill because the CRTO was not performing, it was amended again in 2024, so to speak \nfor the third time, to enlarge the spectrum of offences from 11 offences to 23. This was \nsupposedly, again, so to speak, to catch more traffic offenders and disqualify them, upon \ncommitting four offences within a shorter period of time. \nBut then, as the 2024 elections were imminent, the amendment to extend the total \nspectrum of offences from 11 to 23 was not proclaimed. \nAgain, for the second time, ten years down the line in 2024 after a first time in 2015, \ncheap politics took precedence over road safety in Mauritius. \nSo, I let the hon. Leader of the Opposition to draw his own conclusion. He, who had \nquestioned me during the Private Notice Question on Friday 07 February 2025, has asked me \nto state the measures being taken to address the increasing number of road accidents. \nToday, I am standing in this House with a sense of responsibility as Minister under \nwhose remit falls the subject of road safety. We have come forward with a concrete piece of \nlegislation to replace the non-performing CRTO left behind by the MSM government, and \nlike I said earlier, still prevalent today. \nWe have taken on board nitty-gritty of the specific concerns the Leader of the \nOpposition raised during that PNQ, and I am here referring to the problem, for example, of \nillegal rally of motorcycles. He was quite elaborate on this question; it is a very pertinent \nquestion. \n\n96 \n \nI must stress that this offence is included in the Third Schedule of the Bill and it justly \ncarries the highest number of points, that is, 8 to 10 points out of a total of 15 points. \nBut then, Madam Speaker, the legislation will not bring the desired results without \neffective enforcement by the Police and other authorised officers. \nAllow me, now, to respond to criticisms levelled against the Bill. Some have qualified \nthe reintroduction of the Penalty Points System as a punitive measure that also seeks to \nreplenish the coffers of Government with payment of more fines. \nI beg to differ. Under the CRTO, a driver’s licence could be disqualified as he has \ncommitted only 4 offences. The proposed Bill provides for a disqualification when 15 points \nhave been exceeded, meaning that the person can no longer drive on reaching 16 points. \nSomeone committing offences carrying 2 points, for example, will only be disqualified after \ncommitting such offences 8 times repeatedly over 36 months because you get 15 points for \n36 months. \nAs regards the nonsensical criticism of bringing more money to the coffers, I have to \nemphasise that none of the offences listed in the Schedule to the Bill under penalty points \nhave had their accompanying fines increased. So, that argue does not hold water! \nThe aim is not to generate revenue through fines, but to restore discipline on our roads, \nand to those who still persist and commit mistakes in a repetitive manner, to learn it the hard \nway – to have them removed from driving or riding on our roads until they have decided to \nimprove their behaviours. \nThe provisions laid down in the Bill are corrective rather than punitive in approach.  \nThe figures demonstrate them all.  Between 2013 and 2015, when the Penalty Points System \nwas prevalent, 9 persons only were disqualified from holding a licence. Yet, the number of \nfatalities had dropped by 13% while between 2015 to date, under the CRTO, 249 drivers have \nbeen disqualified and 2 licences have been cancelled. \nSo, let all drivers, in particular professional drivers, take note of this fact before \ndrawing hasty conclusions or allowing themselves to be misguided. \nMadam Speaker, the Penalty Points System has the critical “fear factor”, which is non-\nexistent in the CRTO. The genius of the system is that the points allocated to any driver is \n\n97 \n \nconstant and visible to him that any further offence will bring him closer to disqualification \nor cancellation of his licence. The possibility for him to lose the tremendous privilege of \ndriving following a disqualification is the strongest psychological effect prompting a driving \nbehavioural change in him. \nBy the way, a distinction has to be made between disqualification and cancellation. In \nthe latter case, the driver or rider has to take the test all over again. \nMadam Speaker, the re-introduction of the Penalty Points System is not a trial-and-\nerror experiment that we are now resorting to like the previous government was doing with \nthe CRTO. I have explained earlier the several changes that occurred over the last 10 years.  \nThe Bill is the product of a collective and profound reflection designed to meet an urgent \nnational concern. \nIt is a proven system adopted by several developed nations. Its re-introduction aligns \nour country with proven international best practices.  Wherever the Penalty Points System has \nbeen in operation, it has shown significant and immediate positive impacts on road safety.  I \nam optimistic for the same results in our country. \nThe hon. Attorney General, whom I am very thankful to, has qualified this Bill as being \ntechnical one rather than a philosophical one. \nAllow me, therefore, without any further ado, to delve into the technical clauses of the \nBill. \nClause 4 introduces a crucial instrument of accountability, which is the Penalty Points \nCertificate. This certificate serves as a record of a driver’s accumulated penalty points and in \nline with our commitment to digital governance, this record will be accessible to every driver \nvia a secure digital platform, that is, the MoKloud. This ease of accessibility allows drivers to \nmonitor their points which in turn serves as a deterrent to irresponsible driving behaviour. \nClause 4 also defines the permitted maximum number of 15 points, during a period of 36 \nmonths.  \nFor Provisional Driving Licence holders (commonly known as learners) the maximum \nlimit is set at 10 points. The objective is to inculcate in them safe, responsible and disciplined \ndriving habits from the very start of their driving practice. \n\n98 \n \nFor Competent Driving Licence holders and holders of International Driving Permits, \nthe permitted maximum number of points is 15, again over 36 months.  A driver who has \nreached 16 points, shall upon application from the Licensing Officer, that is, the police, be \ndisqualified by the Court for such period of time as the Court shall determine. \nClause 5 relates to an existing power of the Court to disqualify a person from holding a \ndriving licence.  The amendment being brought sets the maximum delay within which the \nCourt should forward any license which has been surrendered to it subsequent to the \ndisqualification of the license holder to the Licensing Officer.  The maximum delay has been \nset at 30 days. \nMadam Speaker, questions have been raised as to why the present Bill does not cater \nfor allocation of penalty points relating to driving under the influence of alcohol, drug or \nother intoxicating substance, and dangerous driving.  \nI have to reassure the House that the Road Traffic Act already provides for harsher \nsanctions spanning from cancellation of licence, imprisonment of up to 8 years for second \ntime offenders and with fines which have been doubled in this present Bill to Rs500,000 for \nsecond time offenders. But then, I will invite hon. Members to read clauses 6 and 7 of the \npresent Bill together with the second Schedule to the Road Traffic Act. \nIn the interest of time, Madam Speaker, if needed, I can table information in relation \nthereto. Because if I talk about this, it is going to be too lengthy. \nI wish to undertake, if needed, I can table it! \nMadam Speaker: Yes, table it, please! \nMr Osman Mahomed: I will give you later. I wish to underline that any \ndisqualification may be from either holding a licence or obtaining a licence.  The latter is \nrelevant to the question raised.  The Licensing Officer then keeps a record which will prevent \nthe disqualified person from applying for a Provisional Licence for such period as the Court \nhas determined. \nSo, it’s not true to say that there will not be any effect to a person not holding a license \nat the material time of the accident because many people have said that people who have no \nlicenses, will not be penalised because they don’t have license. But then they will be barred \n\n99 \n \nfrom applying for a license between a period of ranging from 12 months to 24 months if they \nare caught because the police will keep a record on this. \nClause 8 of the Bill sets out the process for allocation of penalty points and also the \nperiod of effectiveness of any penalty points allocated. \nIn all circumstances, penalty points are allocated by the Court in addition to any other \nsentence, including monetary or custodial, which it deems fit to pass. While allocating \npenalty points, the Court may, where appropriate, where the licence holder has exceeded the \nmaximum number of points, disqualify the person from holding or obtaining a licence or \neven cancel the driving licence as the case may be. \nIn the Bill, appeal procedures have been provided against the determination of the \nCourt for either allocating a number of points, or disqualifying a person from holding or \nobtaining a licence or even against the cancellation of the licence.  Where there is an appeal, \nany determination or decision of the Court is suspended pending the outcome of the appeal. \nAs regards the effectiveness of penalty points, every point allocated shall remain \neffective for a period of 36 months or until it has been taken into account for the purpose of a \ndisqualification order. Through a collaborative mechanism set out between the Court and the \nLicensing Officer, accumulated penalty points will be managed efficiently and accurately.   \nThere seems to be a misunderstanding on this issue among the public as gathered from \ninterventions made in the media. The law is very clear. Only the points which have been \nallocated and have “matured” or let us say, actually it’s called “ripe”, so to speak, for a period \nof 36 months will be erased automatically. The others will still appear on the penalty points \ncertificate until their turns for the 36th month have come. \nClause 8 also allows any license holder to apply for and obtain a hard copy of the \npenalty point certificate in his respect from the Licensing Officer on payment of a prescribed \nfee, over and above his status, he can obtain a copy free of charge, anytime on MoKloud.  \nClause 9 inserts a new section (i.e. Section 123H) in the main Act. This section sets out \nin details the period for which the Court shall disqualify a person from holding or obtaining a \ndriving licence where that person has exceeded the permitted number of penalty points. \nIn a nutshell, the Court shall disqualify for a period of not less than 6 months nor more \nthan 12 months holders of all types of licences be it local or international. \n\n100 \n \nQuestions have also been raised as to how the Bill will cater for those driving without \nholding a driving licence. Clause 9 provides a more severe sanction for any person without \nholding a driving licence. His disqualification, like I said earlier, will be for a period of 12 \nmonths over and above what other legislations cater for.   \nThis Clause also provides that any person who has been disqualified shall surrender his \nlicence or permit to the Court as soon as possible but not later than 5 days of any Court order \nmade in that respect for retention. This process sends a strong message of deterrence to \nrepeated offenders. It reinforces the seriousness and awareness of the loss of privilege of \ndriving. \nClause 9 also provides that the Court shall order for every person whose licence is \ndisqualified for any period of time to follow a rehabilitation course, which shall be approved \nby the Licensing Officer, that is the Police, before the licence is restored to him. \nBy virtue of the same section of the law, a person who is a licensed driving instructor \nwill have to surrender his driving instructor’s licence as well for retention in the event that his \ndriving licence is disqualified. \nClause 10, focuses on the possibility for redemption of points and this is a novelty as \ncompared to the last version of the penalty points system. The holder of a driving licence or \ninternational driving permit who has accumulated at least 10 points but not more than 14 \npenalty points may apply to the Court for the redemption of a maximum of 3 points. An \napplication form has been prescribed for that purpose. The person has to complete a \nrehabilitation course before applying for redemption of points. \nIt needs to be explained that, the redemption of a maximum of 3 penalty points shall \nrelate to the last offence, implying that, if a person was allocated only 2 points for his last \noffence, only 2 points will be redeemed. If 4 points or more were allocated for the last \noffence, only 3 points shall be redeemed. \nThe holder of a licence who applies for the redemption of points may do so \nsubsequently only after 36 months. I think this is an important point to be retained. The \nholder of a provisional driving licence cannot apply for any redemption of points – meaning \nlearners. \nMadam Speaker, the possibility for redemption of points is fundamental as it \nestablishes a clear pathway for drivers to reduce their penalty points through an educational \n\n101 \n \nintervention and reduces the possible risks of disqualification. The contents of the course \nshall be defined by the licensing officer. \nThis Clause underscores the fact that this government’s commitment to road safety is \nnot at all about taking away licences maliciously, as some are pretending. It is verily about \neducating drivers, rewarding corrective driving behaviour and ultimately reducing the \nnumber of road accidents on our roads. \nClause 11 and 12 are not of significance to the Penalty Point System. The first one \nincreases the maximum fine for offences committed under the requirements of the Road \nTraffic Act from Rs100,000 to Rs200,000 and the second one deals with the renumbering of \nschedules attached to the Act. \nClause 13 establishes the procedure for determining the number of penalty points to be \nreferenced on a Fixed Penalty Notice where only one offence is detected on the FPN, the \nnotice shall mention the lowest number of penalty points specified in that range of points for \nthat offence. Where more than one offence is set on a single FPN, the lowest penalty points in \nthe offence carrying the largest range of points shall be inserted in that notice. Where there \nare two or more offences within the same range of penalty points, the FPN shall make \nreference to the lower number of points of any of the offences.   \nClause 14 of the Bill establishes the payment process with regard to fix penalty notices \nand the manner in which the District Court shall endorse the notice with the appropriate \npenalty points and communicate same to the licensing officer.  \nClause 15 relates to instances where a person does not pay the fixed penalty and the \ncase eventually goes to the court for determination. It also provides that where a person is \nconvicted, the court shall allocate the highest number of penalty points for that offence. \nWhere there is more than one offence in the notice, the court shall allocate the highest \nnumber of points in respect of the offence carrying the highest range of penalty points. So, \ndepending on whether you go to the court, you will get the lowest lows of points or highest \nhighs of points in case you lose at the court.  \nClause 16 and 17 deal with speeding offences detected by means of a photographic \nenforcement device for which the police causes a notice, in short PEDN, to be served on the \nowner of vehicle used in commission of the offence. The same principle of allocation of \npenalty point is applied in the case of PEDN as that applied for a fixed penalty notice. The \nPEDN has only one offence recorded therein and the lowest number of penalty points is \n\n102 \n \nreferenced in the notice served on the offender. However, in the event the penalty is not paid \nand the matter is referred to the court, the court shall allocate the highest number of points for \nthat offence.  \nMadam Speaker, questions have been raised in several quarters as to why a range of \npoints have been provided for each offence instead of fixed number of points. This approach \ngives licence holders the choice to admit outright the commission of the offence and thus pay \nthe minimum penalty to be allocated the lowest number of penalty points. For those who \ndecide to refer the matter to the court and are found guilty, the law provides for a maximum \nfine and highest number of penalty points to be inflicted. It is note-worthy that the Penalty \nPoint System of 2013 also had a range of points and its application did not pose any \nadministrative or legal problem.  \nClause 18 to 23 cover mainly the repeal and replacement of schedules. Clause 24 of the \nBill addresses transitional arrangements, specifically it makes provision, detailing how \ndisqualifications imposed under the repeal section of the law dealing with the CRTO will be \nlegally dealt with during the transition to the new provisions set out in the Bill.  \nMadam Speaker, the Bill is not a copy paste document of the previous 2013 legislation. \nIt cannot be compared to the times and times amended legislation which constitutes the \nCRTO. This Bill is an improved and comprehensive piece of legislation which is designed to \ncope with our present road safety challenges and response as much as possible to the call of \nthe hour in terms of road safety.  \nThe new schedule of offences comprises 33 traffic offences as compared 19 under the \n2013 legislation, covering various aspects of road safety. This expansion in the number of \noffences is critical as it plucks in several loopholes and addresses dangerous driving \nbehaviours which were previously dealt with only by fines; a course of enforcement which \nlack deterrence for repeated offenders. All the offences listed in the schedule prioritise factors \nidentified in road crashes data namely in four categories which is – \n• \nSpeed – for example, driving at excessive speed; \n• \nDistraction – for example, the use of mobile phones whilst driving; \n• \nRestraint – for example, the non-use of seatbelts and failure to use child \nrestraints; \n\n103 \n \n• \nRecklessness – for example, dangerous driving, overtaking over continuous white \nline, and failing to comply with traffic signals.  \nThe thresholds and values in this Bill have been specifically calibrated to align with \nevidence-based standards used in the most successful jurisdictions. The range of penalty \npoints are in no way arbitrary; they are correlated with the frequency and severity of an \noffence contributing to fatal and serious crashes. \nMadam Speaker, one key aspect of the modernisation of the Penalty Point System is \nthe Penalty Point Certificate. There will not be any driving licence counterpart as there was in \nthe first penalty point of 2013. The digital e-counterpart will incorporate sophisticated QR-\ncode for security and authenticity purposes. To ensure the accurate and real time management \nof the Penalty Point System, a comprehensive IT enhancement programme integration will be \nundertaken across the following key government entities for a seamless inter-operability \namong each of these platforms and to securely link these 3 systems principally.  \n1. \nThe Revenue Collection and Case Management System of the judiciary; \n2. \nThe Integrated Driving Licence Management of the Police; \n3. \nThe National Land Transport Authority IT System.  \nMadam Speaker, countries like Singapore and the UK, which have a penalty point \nsystem in operations since decade, both of fatality rates per 100,000 population are 1.9 per \n100,000 and 4.7 respectively. The rates of fatalities reflect the high level of discipline and \ngood drivers’ behaviour achieved through strict application of the traffic laws and effective \nenforcement. In the case of our country, our fatality rate is 10-11 per 100,000, which is five \nto six times more than Singapore population and has remained constant for a decade.  \nWe need to benchmark ourselves with countries which have been successful and try our \nbest through all possible means to lower our fatality rates. This is the ambition of this \ngovernment and one of the priority objectives of my Ministry and I sincerely hope that we \nsucceed.  \nTo conclude, Madam Speaker, the legislation we are passing today, will determine the \nroad safety of our citizens for tomorrow. I am optimistic that it will contribute to save lives \nand consequently reduce the suffering of many families. I reiterate that the philosophy of the \nBill is for safe driving to be inculcated and duly rewarded and for recklessness to be \naddressed with utmost severity and swift consequences.  \n\n104 \n \nIt is also an opportunity to bring our legal framework on road safety at par with \ninternational norms while emphasising discipline and responsible driving. For all good intents \nbehind the reintroduction of the Penalty Point System, I am convinced that hon. Members in \nthis House will uphold this Bill. Let this Assembly be remembered as the one which finally \ntook the bold and decisive step to curve carnage on our roads. Let us together give our \ncitizens the safety they deserve while using our roads. It is my sincere duty to acknowledge \nthe dedication of all those who have been involved in the preparation of this significant piece \nof legislation. \nI wish to extend my deepest appreciation and thanks to the officers of the Prime \nMinister’s Office, the Attorney General’s Office, police department, the NLTA, the Traffic \nManagement and Road Safety Unit and the staff of my Ministry who form part of the \ncommittee I chaired on the subject matter. Their diligent efforts, collaborative spirits and \nexpert advice have been instrumental in meticulously drafting and refining this critical Bill.  \nAbove all, I would like to thank the hon. Prime Minister for his firm and unwavering \nsupport in enabling the introduction of the Bill and the hon.  Deputy Prime Minister as well. \nThis morning, he actually called me for more details. I am thankful to the hon. Attorney \nGeneral for always lending a helping hand and invaluable advice whenever required, and I \nlook forward to working with the hon. Minister of ICT as regards the digitalisation aspect, \nwhich remains a sine qua non for the successful implementation of this legislation.  \nBy passing this Bill, Madam Speaker, we are not merely imposing new rules; we are \nlaying the essential foundation for a long-term vision, a disciplined road network and a nation \nwhere road trauma is significantly reduced. \nOn this note, Madam Speaker, and with these remarks, I commend the Bill to the \nHouse.  \nDr. Boolell rose and seconded.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Maybe, we can raise for tea. Yes. Thank you very much.  \nAt 4.51 p.m., the Sitting was suspended.  \nOn resuming at 5.42 p.m., with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, please be seated!  \nYes, hon. Leader of the Opposition! \n\n105 \n \n(5.43 p.m.) \nThe Leader of the Opposition (Mr G. Lesjongard): Thank you, Madam Speaker, for \ngiving me the floor to intervene on the Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill. Here we are again, \nMadam Speaker, having another debate in this House on the Road Traffic Amendments.  \nThis time, it is for the reintroduction of the Penalty Points System. Honestly, Madam \nSpeaker, I cannot understand why it took a whole year for the Government to reintroduce a \nsystem that was implemented before. I recall when I put a PNQ to the hon. Minister back in \nFebruary, he had stated that they are working on the reintroduction of that system. In the \nmonth of July, I had put another question to him. At that time, he had said that Cabinet had \napproved. It is only six months later that this piece of legislation is being introduced in the \nHouse. \nMadam Speaker, I still remember how critical the current Minister was with regard to \nour road traffic system back in his days in the Opposition. I believe one year down in his \nmandate now, he has seen the amount of work that has been done and the challenges that still \nremain, it is safe to say that he has been humbled, Madam Speaker. \nNevertheless, we are not here today to discuss on the performance of the hon. Minister, \nand I shall not stoop to that level by being demagogical on the number of… \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Il est toujours en train de faire du bruit. \nOne moment! Do you mind staying in your seat so I can see at the back who is \nmumbling?  \nCome inside. Do not go outside. \nMr Lesjongard: Is this okay? \nMadam Speaker: Will the hon. Member, back bencher, please let him speak?  \n(Interruptions) \nMr Etwareea: If he has something to say, yes. \nMadam Speaker: Non, non. Mais vous, ce n’est pas le moment.  \nMr Lesjongard: May I now, Madam Speaker? \nMadam Speaker: Please, carry on. \n\n106 \n \nMr Lesjongard: Thank you. Like I was saying, I shall not stoop by being demagogical \non the number of deaths on our roads even though that number has already exceeded the \nnumber of the previous year. As we say, one death on our roads is too many, Madam Speaker.  \nMais en fait, aujourd’hui, le comportement de certains automobilistes est – si je peux \nfaire une comparaison – comme ces internautes qui démontrent une agressivité sur les \nréseaux sociaux. C’est malheureusement une tendance très dangereuse au niveau de notre \nsociété. \nMadam Speaker, the Penalty Point System – let us be blunt – was an utter failure when \nit was introduced back in 2013. Permettez-moi, pour étayer ce que je suis en train de dire, de \nciter l’extrait d’un hebdomadaire, le Week-End du dimanche 30 novembre, qui écrit ceci avec \nun type qui dit pourquoi le permis à points de 2013 a échoué. On retrouve dans cet article… \nMadam Speaker: C’est un article récent ? \nMr Lesjongard: Oui, très récent. C’est au mois de novembre, le dimanche 30 \nnovembre 2025, Madame la présidente.  \nDans cet article, on se sert des termes tels que « C’est un système trop lourd. Des points \nmal enregistrés. Transmission lente. Dossiers incomplets. Suspension erronée. Application \nillégale d’un district à un autre district. Contestations [et le ministre en a fait part] des \nchauffeurs professionnels. »   \nVoilà un peu ce que disait cet article, Madame la présidente. \nUnfortunately, nothing in the present Bill offers a solution to all the reasons of the \nfailure of the Penalty Point System back in 2014. Therefore, we are simply going backwards.  \nNow, during the previous mandate, Madam Speaker, whether we like it or not, \nconsiderable progress had been achieved with regard to road traffic. For example, road safety \nwas introduced in the school curriculum from Grades 1 to 6 as we all firmly believe that \neducation is key in changing this mindset of hors-la-loi that presently we see on our roads.  \nBut unfortunately, I have to raise an issue in this House, Madam Speaker, to the \nattention of one and everybody, but especially to the Prime Minister. Somebody has brought \nthat to my attention, Madam Speaker. Somebody who has been convicted for numerous \ntraffic offences, and it goes over the years.  \nIf you will allow me, Madam Speaker, I will refer to some of those traffic offences \nwhere he has been convicted. For example – \n\n107 \n \n• \nConvicted on six occasions of one or more offences under CRTO; \n• \nDisqualified for all types of vehicles for two years; \n• \nFailing to give notice for non-renewal of motor vehicle license; \n• \nFailing to give particulars of driver; \n• \nExceeding speed limit by not more than 15km/h; \n• \nFailing to produce driving license on demand; \n• \nInsurance vignette not affixed;  \n• \nExceeding speed limit by more than 15km/h;  \n• \nExceeding speed limit. \nMadam Speaker: What are you citing to us, please? \nMr Lesjongard: Yes, somebody… \nMadam Speaker: No, but what are you citing exactly? \nMr Lesjongard: Convictions. \nMadam Speaker: Convictions of somebody? \nMr Lesjongard: Yes, for traffic offences. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nMr Lesjongard: Why am I citing this? Because I understand that he is… \n(Interruptions) \nLet me finish what I am saying. \nMadam Speaker: No, the… \nMr Lesjongard: He has been recruited as an Adviser in the actual Government, \nMadam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Oh, okay. \nMr Lesjongard: That is why I am citing this! Otherwise, why would I waste the time \nof the House? \nMadam Speaker: No, if you say… \n\n108 \n \nMr Lesjongard: Using a handheld microphone or telephone handset whilst driving.  \nMr Etwareea: It is totally irrelevant! \nMr Lesjongard: Failing to produce driving license on demand or photocopy thereof. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Leader of the Opposition, just one moment! \n(Interruptions) \nWill everybody let me do my job?  \n(Interruptions) \nI do not mind you are saying all this, but start by saying why you are saying it. Then, \nwe will understand! And who you are talking about? \nMr Lesjongard: I will come to that also, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Non, non. Sinon on se dit que vous parlez de n’importe qui. Je ne \nsais pas. \nMr Lesjongard: I have said. I have said, Madam Speaker. That person I am \nmentioning, he is an Adviser… \nMadam Speaker: Now, you are saying! Now, you are saying! \nMr Lesjongard: …of a Minister in Government. \nMadam Speaker: Now, you are saying! \nMr Lesjongard: Yes, I have said that. \nMadam Speaker: But when you started talking… \nMr Lesjongard: Okay, Madam Speaker, there is a long list of convictions. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nMr Lesjongard: Okay? \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Donn so nom! \nMadam Speaker: Exactement! \nMr Lesjongard: No, Madam Speaker, I will not. \n(Interruptions) \n\n109 \n \nI will give it to the Prime Minister later. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, on a point of order. It is not fair he \nthrows this around, and he says he is an Adviser.  \nMadam Speaker: He is an Adviser to which Minister? \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: So, people will think he is any Minister’s Adviser. Give \nus the name! \nMadam Speaker: He is an Adviser in which Ministry? \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: On a point of order, it is unfair.  \nMadam Speaker: In which Ministry is he advising? \nMr Lesjongard: Madam Speaker, … \nMadam Speaker: If that person was advising me, I would like to know. \nMr Lesjongard: He is an Adviser in the Ministry of Public Infrastructure. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Good. What I would suggest, hon. Leader of the Opposition, \nyou have made your point. Can you please refer us to the documents that you have got and \ntell us where these documents emanate from? \nIs it made public? Has it been made public? Il faut me dire! \nMr Lesjongard:  Do you want me to table the document, Madam Speaker? \nMadam Speaker: No, table it if it is authentic and if it has been made public. \nYes, table it if it has been made public. On n’a pas besoin de cacher les choses. \nMr Lesjongard:  Whether it is 20 years ago, Madam Speaker, you cannot recruit \nsomebody who has been convicted for so many offenses that is why I raised this issue whilst \nwe are debating on the Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill. \nMr Gunness: To’nn bliye to leader ti touy dimounn! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard: Madam Speaker …. \n(Interruptions) \nMr Mohamed: You have to give him… \n\n110 \n \nMadam Speaker: So, what has happened now? \nMr Lesjongard:  I will continue. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nMr Lesjongard:  Now, another issue that happened and shocked everybody was video \nof a biker over speeding on the motorway and mocking a patrol officer on his way and the \nhon. Minister, I think he was wrong in doing that – decided to meet that biker. He should \nhave left that to the competent authorities to deal with that biker. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker on a point of order! \nMadam Speaker: No! You mean on a point of personal explanation? \nMr Osman Mahomed: The biker asked to meet me but I did not meet him. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. It was not a point of order. \nMr Lesjongard:  He said on media that he met him. Now, Madam Speaker, with \nregard to drug abuse, necessary amendments were brought to the law to allow the police to \ndetect drugs in the bloodstream or urine of a driver and this was a major breakthrough in law \nenforcement. \nNow, at the beginning of the year, the hon. Prime Minister in a reply to PMQT put to \nhim by hon. F. Quirin, mentioned that only for the month of January, 13 drivers have been \ntested positive to drugs. What I would have expected, what I would have wished is that that \nthe hon. Minister tells us up to now, how many drivers have been tested positive to drugs. \nMadam Speaker, let me say a few words on the cumulative road traffic offences system \nwhich is being abolished today with this legislation. What we should know is that this system \nled to the cancellation of approximately 13 driving licences over the past two years. \nAt first among 11 offences, a driver or motorcyclist ran the risk of suspension of their \nlicence if they committed four offences in a span of 24 months. The law, Madam Speaker, \nwas amended in 2024 to add 12 more offences to this list, some of which I know have been \nincluded in the present Bill, such as –  \n• failing to wear high visibility clothing as a rider; \n• breach of lane discipline on dual carriageway;  \n• failing to give away when coming from a less important road, and also \n\n111 \n \n• taking part in a rally.  \nAnd these inclusions, Madam Speaker, already existed in the legislation. 10 additional \noffences, now, have been included in the present legislation to reach, like the hon. Minister \nhad said earlier, a total of 33 offences. But, just one reference, let me refer to offences 2 and 3 \nregarding headlamps and rear lamps during darkness which I agree Madam Speaker is a \nhazard. But what if it happens while the person is driving? So, he will now lose four points \nand it seems to me this is very harsh, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker, we are now moving from a system where a driver or rider was \nallowed a maximum of four offences from a list of 23 offences in a span of 24 months to a \nsystem of points based on categories of offences on a list of 33 offences over a span of 36 \nmonths. \nPersonally, Madam Speaker, I believe the present system has been subjected to some \nslight modification and repackaged in order to give the impression that this government is \nacting upon the urgency of the situation on our roads. However, any new amendments should \nbe a step forward whereas I believe that these amendments bring us backwards. \nEn résumé, Madame la présidente, le ministre nous propose du déjà vu et avec \nl’attribution de licence graduelle qui figurait déjà dans les amendements de 2024, cela vient \nconfirmer cette théorie. \nNow, the hon. Minister might argue as to why the previous government did not \nproclaim the 2024 amendments. Well, I can tell the hon. Minister, you have had one year and \nyet you did not do it, waiting for some 112 deaths on our roads and now you are proposing \nthe penalty point system which, like I said earlier contains the same offences, Madam \nSpeaker. \nMr Mohamed: Atone my friend. Atone! \nMr Lesjongard: Madam Speaker, the previous government was also coming forward \nwith a driver and educative centre and I wonder what happened in one year on this project \nsince I understand that the land had already been identified. \nNow, with regard to – and the hon. Minister mentioned that in his speech –fines that are \non the way up. Now, considerable increase for certain offences is present in the amendment \nbrought to the House today. But let me remind the hon. Minister because he made mention to \nthat in his speech – that when they were sitting on the Opposition bench and when those fines \n\n112 \n \nwere increased under the previous legislation, this is what they said, Madam Speaker. And I \nrefer to the hon. Minister to what hon. Dr. Boolell said when he intervened on the legislation \nduring that time and I quote – \n“With that substantial increase in fine, you might as well take my vehicle because the \nfines are so excessive. I won’t be able to pay”. \nAnother quote, Madam Speaker – \n“This is not the reason why the government has to rip off taxpayers directly or \nindirectly.” \nAlthough I agree that we should increase the fines, Madam Speaker. Now, some who \nintervened at that time even suggested that this would provide police officers with excessive \npowers and the opportunity to abuse the system and take bribes in order for drivers to retain \ntheir licences. \nYes, it is in the Hansard that is why I am quoting that, Madam Speaker. \nMadame la présidente, la loi était suffisamment, à mon avis, sévère mais le problème \nsur nos routes est beaucoup plus profond. Déjà notre flotte de véhicule sur nos routes est \npassée à 743 190 véhicules – un record, on doit l’accepter. Généré par la brillante idée de ce \ngouvernement d’augmenter la taxe sur les véhicules soi-disant pour les rendre ‘inaccessibles’ \nà une certaine classe, mais cela a résulté à un panic buying à la veille de la présentation du \ndernier budget. Avec une flotte de plus de 740 000 véhicules sur nos routes, cela nous fait en \nmoyenne environ 250 véhicules par kilomètre de route, soit le double de la moyenne \nmondiale. Et qui dit plus de véhicules, Madame la présidente, dit aussi une augmentation de \nla probabilité des accidents sur nos routes. \nAutre fait qui est intéressant – et je dois le souligner – en ce qui concerne les bus \nélectriques, je constate que l’honorable ministre favorise ce programme, c’est-à-dire, on aura \nune flotte de véhicules, de bus électriques qui nous viennent de l’Inde et de ce fait, dans cette \ndémarche, cela nous permet de faire d’une pierre deux coups, c’est-à-dire d’utiliser l’énergie \npropre et en même temps, encourager les mauriciens à voyager par le transport public et de ce \nfait, réduire le nombre de véhicules sur nos routes. Par contre, ce qui est navrant, Madame la \nprésidente, c’est de constater que le gouvernement ne va plus de l’avant avec l’extension du \nMetro Express, car cela aurait permis de diminuer davantage le nombre de véhicules sur nos \nroutes, et de ce fait, les accidents. \n\n113 \n \nMais, Madame la présidente, le problème le plus grave demeure cette fâcheuse culture \nde voyous sur nos routes, cette tendance de certains automobilistes et motocyclistes de faire \nexprès d’enfreindre les règles sur la route. C’est pourquoi j’ai cité un peu plus tôt, Madame la \nprésidente, le cas de ce monsieur. Comme on dit dans le langage créole ; gagn nissa lor \nlarout. \n(Interruptions) \nComme si les lois sont là pour ne pas les respecter, et puis se vanter autour de son entourage \ncomme ce motard que le ministre – et il me dit maintenant qu’il ne l’a pas rencontré – et qui \nroulait, il faut le dire, Madame la présidente, peut-être à plus de 150 kilomètres par heure sur \nl’autoroute. Mais, je pense que ce n’est pas le permis à points qui va faire disparaitre cette \nculture auprès des chauffards, car il faut tout de même qu’il y ait des contrôles de police sur \nnos routes, afin d’intercepter ces bandits. Mais, leur constat aussi, Madame la présidente, \nc’est que la situation du law and order dans le pays est déplorable. On aurait pu demander \naux policiers de faire ce travail, mais ils sont surmenés en ce moment-ci et il y a un flagrant \nmanque d’effectifs, et en plus de ça comme je l’ai dit, ils ont du pain sur la planche. \nMadame la présidente, c’est l’ancien gouvernement qui avait adopté la politique de zéro \ntolérance sur l’alcool au volant, mais force est de constater que beaucoup échappe toujours à \nla loi et malheureusement, Madame la présidente, c’est les innocents qui perdent leur vie. \nPermettez-moi, Madame la présidente, de citer un jugement, le jugement Durocher en 2008 \navait renversé une loi qui permettait à la police de suspendre le permis de conduire et avait \nstatué que seul un magistrat avait ce pouvoir. Depuis, rien n’avait été fait jusqu’à \nl’amendement de 2024, et j’aimerais que le ministre aujourd’hui considère cet amendement \nde façon à demander à la cour de suspendre immédiatement le permis d’une personne \nimpliquée dans un accident fatal et testée positive à un alcotest ou à un test de drogue. Je \npense que j’aurais le support de pas mal de membres de cette auguste Assemblée dans cette \ndémarche et tout conducteur, Madame la présidente, pris en flagrant délit ne pourra pas \nreprendre le volant avant que la cour ne rende son verdict. \nMadame la présidente…  \n(Interruptions) \nMr Osmand Mahomed: C’est déjà dans la loi. \nMr Lesjongard: Madame la présidente, le Premier ministre – je me réfère à lui comme \nil a fait des commentaires – avait même suggéré qu’il fallait faire saisir les véhicules de tels \n\n114 \n \naccusés. Ben, j’aimerais bien savoir combien de ces véhicules ont été saisis à ce jour, surtout \naprès les tristes évènements par exemple, de Camp Levieux et de Cité la Cure. \nMadame la présidente, on ne peut non plus tolérer qu’une personne passe à travers les \nmailles du filet en invoquant le refus de se soumettre à un alcotest ou à un drug test. \n(Interruptions) \nTout refus… \n(Interruptions) \nTout refus doit être considéré comme un délit plus sévère qui devrait entraîner une plus \ngrosse amende, et pourquoi pas une perte de points considérable. Selon les statistiques, \nMadame la présidente, les motocyclistes et surtout les jeunes sont les plus vulnérables. Peut-\nêtre que le gouvernement devrait considérer à revoir cette section de la loi qui permet à un \nmineur de conduire une moto avec un simple learner. \nMadame la présidente, il est impératif aussi – ça je pense qu’on le voit sur nos routes – \nde légiférer sur l’utilisation des scooters électriques. Je l’admets, c’est un moyen de transport \npratique, mais souvent conduit sur les routes principales de notre pays par des personnes qui \nn’ont pas eu une formation adéquate et très souvent qui ne portent pas de casque, Madame la \nprésidente. \nMs Anquetil: Ça c’est vrai ! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Là tout le monde est d’accord. \nMr Lesjongard: Oui ! \nMadam Speaker: Oui, ce n’est pas fait pour ce genre… \nMr Lesjongard: Oui, s’ils sont d’accord permettez-moi d’ajouter ; autant de choses, \nMadame la présidente… \n(Interruptions) \n…qui sont absentes de ce projet de loi. \nMadame la présidente, je suis assez sceptique par rapport à la mise en chantier de cette \nlégislation. Il y a chaque année en moyenne 1 350 000 décès dans le monde sur les routes. \nNous sommes une petite île et pourtant, le constat est aussi alarmant chez nous. Aujourd’hui, \n\n115 \n \nle gouvernement propose de revenir à un système qui a échoué, avec les mêmes paramètres et \nles mêmes problèmes. Mais, je ne veux pas être pessimiste, Madame la présidente, car il y va \nde la vie de nos concitoyens, et ce genre de sujet doit rester apolitique et l’intérêt supérieur de \nnotre pays, de nos concitoyens doit primer. \n Toutefois, Madame la présidente, le ministre du Transport terrestre nous a beaucoup \ncritiqué de son temps dans l’Opposition. Aujourd’hui, c’est à son tour de gérer cette situation \nqui empire de jour en jour, et je lui souhaite bon vent. Merci. \nMadam Speaker: Merci beaucoup. Alors, nous avons Dr. Boolell, yes? He was on his \nfeet before I could see him. \n(6.11 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries (Dr. A. Boolell): Yes, thank you, Madam Speaker. I have listened – like all of us – intently to the \nspeech delivered by the hon. Leader of Opposition… \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Not all of us, some are absent. \nDr. Boolell: Yes, some deliberately chose to be away from you, the Leader of the \nOpposition. I think overall, he has been rather fair. His criticisms are well meant. One of his \nregrets is that we should have proclaimed the Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill, moved by the \nthen Minister, hon. Ganoo in 2024. Other than that, let me remind the hon. Leader of \nOpposition that this Bill was not thrust upon us. It was a Bill well prepared and moved by the \nhon. Minister who has a lot of milestones. \nAs he has said, there was a Special Envoy of the UN Secretary General who came to \ntender advice to us on road safety, and that his presence was largely due to the intervention of \nour Prime Minister. \nLet me state very clearly that when it comes to road safety and road security, we have \nno lessons to learn from the Opposition. If you may recall, in 1997, the Prime Minister, Dr. \nNavin Ramgoolam, stated emphatically that the link road from La Vigie to Nouvelle France \nshould be closed because it was the corridor of death with its two lanes. Then, the Prime \nMinister met – if my memory serves me right – the President of the EU Commission, and \nfunding was obtained to turn this corridor of death into a dual carriageway to cater for the \nneeds of motorists and to drive safely on a dual carriageway. So, this is important.  \n\n116 \n \nIt is good to remind ourselves of the governance of a Prime Minister and a Deputy \nPrime Minister, and all of us, that we are a government which acts in the interest of the \npublic, and we put safety and road security first.  \nWhen we go through the provisions of this Bill, what is the main thrust, as I said? It is \ndeterrence. And deterrence is high on our agenda. It is a message which is being conveyed \nloud and clear to all road users.  \nOne should not forget that in his speech, when he moved his Second Reading, the then \nMinister of Land Transport and Light Rail reminded us that the road network, as of April \n2024, stands at 686,704 vehicles on our road. Earlier, the Leader of the Opposition stated that \nelectric cycles have to be registered. But they have to be registered, first and foremost, with \nthe National Land Transport Authority. It is going to be done.  \nThis Bill, Madam Speaker, has its merits, and the merits far outweigh any of the points \nthat have been raised by the Leader of the Opposition. We were cautious. I recall when we \nwere discussing our electoral programme – I think all of our good friends will recall – it was \nan issue that was raised, flagged and flogged, and we stated very clearly that we are going to \nintroduce the Penalty Points System. That was said. I recall hon. Anil Bachoo was there. \nThere were almost wide discussions, and the technicians who were with us highlighted the \nmerits of Penalty Points System. \nSince the last 10 years, Madam Speaker, there has been progressive decline in road \nsafety and security. When we do a comparative study and look at the contrasts, it stands to \nreason that the decision taken by the hon. Minister, with the support of technicians, after \nadvice was tendered by Mr Todt, the Penalty Points System is the best. I recall what it was \nwhen I was in New Zealand. In New Zealand, they have what they call the Demerit Points \nSystem. The Demerit Points System is no different from our penalty system and it is very \neffective. \nSo, as a loving nation, we have to look at safety and security priorities. If we love our \nchildren, if we love our people, we have to make sure that safety and security are all \nencompassing, and rest largely on prevention, education, good infrastructure, fitness centre. \nWe have to inculcate the values of responsibility on our drivers. Safe driving – click clunk! \nBut make sure that when there is a click clunk of the safety belt, the message conveyed is \nsafe driving because we know what are the consequences.  \n\n117 \n \nNotwithstanding deterrence, repeated offenders cannot get away with murder. Repeated \noffenders will have to bear their consequences. When we look at the primary purpose of the \nBill, it is clear. It is to create an effective mechanism that promotes better – the word “better” \nis there – compliance with traffic regulations, and the ultimate goals of enhancing the safety \nof road users and encouraging responsible driving behaviour. The key note is responsible \ndriving behaviour. \nThe Cumulative Road Traffic Offences introduced in 2015 was initially, of course, \nintended to improve road safety by disqualifying drivers after they committed a host of \nspecific traffic offences, but it failed to deliver. We are yet to find out what are the expected \noutcomes. The expected outcome is that there has been no outcome. The outcome is that we \nhad no choice, but to ensure that we come up with the Penalty Points System. Despite their \nalleged best endeavour, several amendments were brought to the then Road Traffic \n(Amendment) Bill to make the Cumulative Road Traffic Offences harsher. Over the years, \nfrom 2018 to 2023, the number of offences required for disqualification was adjusted. \nSo, we are now introducing – the Minister has moved the Bill – the Road Traffic \n(Amendment) Bill (No. XXX of 2025), and it is indeed a turning point. The Penalty Points \nSystem is an effective deterrent, as I have said, especially for repeated offenders who risk \nhaving their driving licences suspended or cancelled. But the good thing to note is that the \nproposed system is fair, transparent and clearly outlines the consequences of irresponsible \ndriving. The Cumulative Road Traffic Offences mechanism, which is still in place, operates \nas a reactive measure, addressing offences only after a driver has already accumulated a \ncertain number of convictions. This driving has shown its limits.  \nThe Bill makes a vast difference. It encourages and reinforces disciplined driving. \nCompliance with road safety rules is vital. It becomes a legitimate reflex condition, and \ndrivers have to act cautiously as a consequence of each traffic violation committed. \nMadam Speaker, I have said it and it is good to reinforce that the Penalty Points System \nintroduces an essential deterrent effect that the Cumulative Road Traffic Offences lacks. Its \nstrength lies in the fact that the points assigned to a driver serve as a continual and visible \nreminder that any additional offence bring him closer to having his licence suspended or \ncancelled. So, the threat of losing the valuable privilege of driving acts as a powerful \npsychological motivator, prompting meaningful changes in driving behaviour. \n\n118 \n \nLet us now look at the salient features of the Bill which have been stated loud and clear \nby the Minister, but it is good to reinforce some of them. I will refer to the main features.  \nThe 33 offences will now carry penalty points as against 19 during the first deployment \nof the system. And, there is no doubt the proposed system will be a more effective response \nto the rising traffic toll of fatalities recorded on our roads in recent years. In the proposed \nBill, provision is made for a range of penalty points to be allocated to each offence instead of \na fixed number of points. \nMoreover, when an offence is detected on the fixed penalty notice or the photographic \nenforcement device notice, reference shall be made to the lowest number of penalty points in \nrespect of that offence. Whereas if a person doesn’t agree with a fixed penalty point or the \nphotographic enforcement device notice, he can go to court, that’s as of right and the court \nshall allocate the highest number in the range of penalty points if person is, of course, guilty. \nThis will encourage a speedy settlement of fines. I have heard that detection of an offence \nwould be difficult if a driver has burned the traffic light because a person will not be caught \non camera as a is no camera sometimes at specific places. But this is going to be addressed.  \nNow, the Bill provides for penalty point certificate and the digital version, of course, we \nhave to move with constant breakthrough in technology, the digital version of which can be \naccessed any time on the MoKloud platform. And, this is the essence of this Bill, moving \nwith technology and making it accessible to one and all within the comfort of your room at \nthe time when they are probably, they are also worried but at the same time enjoying arm \nchair comfortability. Only a hard copy of the certificate duly provided and certified by the \npolice will be against payment. Digital access to the certificate will allow the individual to \nbetter monitor the penalty points and adjust the behaviour on the roads. \nThe Bill, as per clause 9, allows for a permitted maximum number of penalty points, I \nthink that was said by the hon. Minister in relations a holder of provisional license, it’s 10 \npoints; 15 for competent license holder but all points will be valid for a period of 36 months \nand the holder of an international driving permit will also be entitled to a maximum of 15 \npoints.  \nMadam Speaker, of course, a person who has been disqualified, and we refer to clause \n9, the person who has been disqualified, has no choice but to surrender his license to the court \nwhich shall be retained as long as the disqualification is in force. Basically, what I am saying \n\n119 \n \nis that this Bill is a very thorough; no stone has been left unturned and credit goes to the \nexperts and to the State Law Office, to have prepared a Bill which has substance and a Bill \nwhich not only will act as a deterrent but it’s a Bill which has all its merits. \nMadam Speaker, let me refer to a PQ which was put to the hon. Prime Minister. I am \nnot going to go over the fines because that will be spelt out, I am sure, when the hon. Minister \nwill make his concluding remark. But there was a PQ with two supplementaries put to the \nhon. Prime Minister by hon. Dr. Aumeer, at the last Sitting. And, the hon. Prime Minister’s \nreply said it all, ‘no retreat no surrender over life and livelihood’. \nMadam Speaker: Of course! \nDr. Boolell: We have a high incidence of road traffic accident. Enough is enough. \nDrink, drug, drive is not only an offence but a serious misdemeanour, a serious crime. \nMadam Speaker, the purpose is not only to convey a message but the message has to be \nreceived loud and clear. And, there is notwithstanding a deterrence but the provisions of the \nlaw are there to be applied as and when required in relation to offences and the gravity of the \noffences. \nLife is precious. Those who are victims suffer tremendously on all counts and waiting \nfor a case to be heard and damages to be paid is hell. This tragedy deserves to be addressed \nand justice should not be denied or delayed. The Court has been impressed to deliver a \njudgement within reasonable time and we all know what it means for a wheel bound victim to \nwait.  \nOne of the most important aspects of the legislation is the increase in the fines relating \nto causing death by dangerous driving or causing death by careless driving which under the \ninfluence of alcohol, drug or intoxicating substance, the sentence can be – intoxicating \nsubstance from Rs50,000 to Rs100,000. The second, for subsequent conviction will carry \nmaximum fine of Rs500,000.  \nBut the forensic scientific lab has to deliver. It has to be able to carry out the test and \ntell with certainty and reliability as to the level of drugs in the blood of the alleged offender. \nMadam Speaker, there are so many issues that can be raised and discussed but let me \nmake it clear that I have intervened to convey a message – deterrence, first and foremost. If \nwe are going to drive, make sure that we drive carefully. Afterall, we are here to protect lives \n\n120 \n \nand as a responsible Government, we have moved a legislation which has substance and the \nsubstance is there to safeguard and to protect those whose lives are important to all of us. \nThank you very much. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Seeburn! \n(6.28 p.m.) \nMr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle): Thank you, \nMadam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker, it is with a deep sense of response that I rise today to speak in support \nof the Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill. A Bill that introduces the long-awaited point-based \nsystem. A reform whose time has not only come but whose importance can no longer be \nignored as it addresses an important issue that affects every road user and every family in our \ncountry, that is, road safety. \nMadam Speaker, in recent years, our nation has witnessed a troubling and persistent \nrise in road accidents. Every statistic is more than a number, sometimes a mother grieving the \nloss of a child, a family shattered overnight or sometimes someone’s future is tragically cut \nshort as stated by the hon. Minister of Land Transport. \nMadam Speaker, these are matters of serious concern. These are realities for too many \nMauritians. We must act decisively. We must reduce road death and serious injuries. Our road \nonce a symbol of connectivity and progress are increasingly becoming a space of danger, \nuncertainty and loss. \nMadam Speaker, the situation on our road demands honesty and boldness from all of \nus, including the hon. Leader of the Opposition who made several observations on this Bill, \nyet he did not express any disagreement.  \nRoad accidents in Mauritius are claiming lives, inflicting devastating injuries, thus \nleaving families and communities in grief. These tragedies carry not only emotional \nconsequences but also social and economic loss. \nMadam Speaker, we must ask ourselves – are we prepared to remain silent, passive \nwhile tragedies multiply? Are we willing to tell our citizens that we saw the warning signs, \nyet we failed to act. The answer is no, Madam Speaker. Today we are confronted with a \nsimple duty. A duty to act before another life is lost. This amendment is a firm answer to that \n\n121 \n \ncall. It establishes an effective framework for better compliance with traffic laws. It aims to \nenhance the protection of road users and foster a culture of responsible driving. \nMadam Speaker, at the heart of this amendment, is the reintroduction of the penalty \npoint system, the permis à points. The reform establishes a structured approach that holds \noffenders accountable, a system that discourages repeated dangerous driving behaviour. By \nassigning penalty points for traffic offences and suspending or restricting licences when \ndrivers accumulate too many points, thus encouraging better and safer driving behaviour.  \nThis is a well-drafted legislation by the State Law office introduced by the Minister of \nLand Transport which addresses nearly all the major issues.  \nMadam Speaker, the amendment promotes deterrence and promotes drivers’ \nresponsibility. By assigning demerit points to traffic offences, the system gives drivers a \ntangible accumulating penalty beyond one-off line. Knowing that repeated infractions can \nlead to licence suspension or revocation, this will make careless drivers more cautious. \nMadam Speaker, studies around the world have shown that drivers who approach the \nthreshold of licence loss, significantly reduce their probability of committing further \noffences. The system further helps to identify and remove repeat and high-risk offenders. It \nfurther gives the authority a tool to remove persistent dangerous drivers because they cause \nserious accidents.  \nMadam Speaker, the Bill reintroduces a modern penalty point system covering 33 \ndifferent traffic offences. It is our duty as protectors of public safety to ensure that the system \nis adopted and implemented effectively. Our aim is to correct driving behaviour and build a \nculture of responsible driving. We must ensure that the system will function, it will deter and \nabove all, save lives. It will further require a nationwide education campaign so that every \ncitizen understands the 33 offences, how point accumulates and how points can be redeemed \nthrough rehabilitation programmes, thus making it fair and transparent. \nThe reform introduces something crucial that has been missing for too long – a \nstructured and transparent system of accountability, a deterrence against repeated violations, \na behaviour shift from impunity to responsibility, a national commitment for prevention over \ncure.  \nMadam Speaker, most importantly, it sends a message – loud, clear and united across \nthis House. The life of every citizen and every road user matters more than the convenience \n\n122 \n \nof few reckless drivers. Few accidents mean lower burden on hospitals, less cost for \ninsurance and damages, and stronger social stability.  \nMadam Speaker, this is a government that does not wait for tragedy to escalate before \nacting. We are serious. This amendment tackles these driving behaviours by introducing \nconsequences that change mindsets and habits. If we are serious about reducing road \naccidents, we must confront the root cause and tackle the main reasons which are speeding, \ndrunk driving, dangerous overtaking, driving while distracted over mobile phone use, \nignoring traffic signals among others. These causes high risk of road accidents leading to loss \nof lives, serious injuries, emotional trauma for families or event economic loss for the \ncountry.  \nMadam Speaker, the amendment is to deter reckless driving. It is to create \naccountability and encourage safer driving habits with a view to reduce fatalities and \naccidents. It is not about punishment but rather about prevention and protection. The \namendment to the Third Schedule now clearly assigns penalty points that ranges to 33 road \ntraffic offences grading according to seriousness from 2 to 10 points for the most dangerous \nviolations.  \nWhat does this tell us? It tells us that the law finally differentiates between minor \noffences and a dangerous act with casualties and deaths. For example, riding a motorcycle \nwithout wearing a helmet carries 2 to 4 points, failing to give uninterrupted passage to a \npedestrian on a crossing carries 2 to 4 points, and speeding beyond 15km but not more than \n25km above the limit also results in a 2 to 4 points while grossly dangerous conduct such as \ndangerous driving attracts the highest point penalties under the schedule. \nMadam Speaker, some may claim that the system is too severe but to answer it directly, \na careful driver will never meet the limit of this system. As hon. Dr. Boolell, earlier said, the \npenalty point system is the best system to address these issues. \nMadam Speaker, the Bill also offers a path of redemption. Drivers who accumulate 10 \nto 14 points may apply to the court for redemption of up to 3 points after completing a \nrehabilitation course which may further encourage better driving culture. This shows that the \namendment does not merely punish; it reforms, rehabilitates and protects.  \nMadam Speaker, countries around the world that have adopted the penalty point system \nhave claimed that it has worked. The system has helped to change driving behaviours. It \nimproves accountability and most importantly, save lives. Furthermore, international \n\n123 \n \nexperience shows that a penalty point licence, when embedded in strong enforcement \neducation, can significantly reduce crashes, injuries and death.  \nJapan has used a point-based system for decades and as part of a broader and safer \nframework, helped over long-term fatality rates with reduced accidents. Spain’s penalty point \nsystem produced a clear reduction in drivers involved in road accidents with injured people. \nAustralia also used a point-based system and authorities have reported a decline in casualties \nduring intensified enforcement windows. Israel’s evaluation of a point demerit-based system \nshowed large drops in violations and meaningful reduction in accident involvement among \ndrivers.  \nMadam Speaker, systematic reviews confirms that the approach can cut harmful \noutcome by around one fifth when properly implemented. Today, our Government proposes \nthe same because we believe the safety of Mauritians are not negotiable. The reform places \nGovernment of Mauritius on the right side of progress, aligning our laws with effective \nglobal standards.  \nMadam Speaker, let us be clear; it is a system designed to protect and not to punish. It \nis a lifeline for families. It is a national necessity. The population wants the Parliament to act. \nCitizens want safer roads with more responsible drivers and less road tragedy.  \nMadam Speaker, the law alone does not stop reckless driving but consequences do. \nWhen you know that dangerous driving behaviour on the road carries measurable personal \nconsequences that is, penalty points with the risk of driving licence cancellation, you drive \ndifferently, you think differently and you act differently.  \nMadam Speaker, this is a listening, caring and responsible government doing what is \nright. The people watching us today in villages, towns, homes and hospitals do not want \nsymbolic gestures. They do not want politics as usual; they want actions, responsibility and \nprotection. They want to know that this Parliament has listened and today, we are answering \nthem with prevention, responsibility and leadership. The greatest right we can protect today is \nthe right of every road user to reach home safely.  \nLet this Parliament be remembered that we collectively choose to save lives on the road \nso as to make a safer and better Mauritius. The Bill is the most significant step in a decade \ntowards safer road, responsible drivers and a more disciplined society. It requires the support \nof the House with conviction and unity, and with this shared belief that every life lost on our \nroad, is one life too many.  \n\n124 \n \nMadam Speaker, with these words, I thank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nYes, hon. Ms Henriette-Manan.  \n(6.40 p.m.) \nMs D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues): Thank you, Madam \nSpeaker. I shall be short but I hope to the point.  \nA life lost on our road, is a stark reminder that every journey we take, carries \nresponsibility, not certainty. This is what makes this amended Bill before this august \nAssembly today so crucial. Our roads have claimed far too many lives, inflicted deep pain on \nfamilies and created havoc across our society.  \nAs decision makers, we cannot stand aside and simply watch and pray. Action is \nimperative and I commend this Government for taking decisive steps and addressing the issue \nwith the urgency it demands. A new approach was needed; a new approach is being \nproposed. Bravo to the hon. Minister and his team.  \nThe Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill is an important legislative reform aimed at \nmodernising our traffic regulations and strengthening road safety. Rodrigues welcomes this \nreform, but again, it must be adapted to the unique realities of our island.  \nAlthough in recent years, Rodrigues has seen a significant increase in the number of \nvehicles on the road. Despite this growth, we remain one of the regions with the lowest \nnumber of serious road accidents. On average in recent years, up to 2024, Rodrigues has \nrecorded between 175 and 200 road accidents per year, including around four fatal accidents \nin 2024. The highest number of deaths by road accidents registered over the last five years in \na specific year being six recorded in 2021. These numbers are relatively low compared to \nmainland Mauritius. \nHowever, we have still experienced tragic road fatalities, reminding us that safety can \nnever be taken for granted. With the rise in traffic, especially two-wheelers, we must \nanticipate future risk. That is why we welcome measures that aim to strengthen, control and \ndiscourage those who intend to disregard the road traffic code. One of the most important \nelements of this legislative reform is the strengthening or introduction of a point-based \ndriving license. A point-based driving license promotes responsibility and encourages \n\n125 \n \nprudence on road. It sanctions dangerous driving fairly. Those regular offenders are deterred \nfrom repeating these offences.  \nIt encourages safer behaviour without penalising responsible road users and it educates, \nas it is mentioned that offenders whose license had been suspended, need to follow road \nsafety classes before being submitted back their driving license. \n For Rodrigues, this system is particularly relevant as it acts as a preventive tool \ndeterring speeding and reckless driving, especially driving under the influence of alcohol or \nintoxicating substances, and it acts as a fair mechanism even on our small island. \nHowever, for the system to work properly, enforcement is capital. To ensure effective \nenforcement, our traffic officers must be better equipped. This means to be equipped with \nmodern speed radars, have reliable communication tools, have vehicles adapted to Rodrigues’ \ntopography and regular specialised training. A law cannot be effective if the officers \nenforcing it lack the appropriate tools. \nRodrigues cannot be left with insufficient enforcement capabilities. A point-based \nlicense without proper control would be a law in principle, not in practice. Now, no one \ndisputes that Rodrigues has a challenging topography. Winding roads, narrow bends, several \nsections passing through villages and rural areas, these make high speeds naturally unsafe. \nBut this does not mean that the current speed limit capped at 50km/h should remain frozen in \ntime. That limitation was set many years ago and does not fully reflect the evolution of our \nvehicle fleet nor the improvement of several road sections and the current mobility needs of \nour people. \nIn many areas, the limit has become outdated and people are being sanctioned unfairly. \nVisitors as well as Rodriguans often question this limit. With the introduction of the Penalty \nPoints System, it becomes even more unfair. I therefore propose a measured and sensible \nrevision of speed limits differentiated according to road category, but again, any increase, \neven a modest one, must go hand in hand with stronger enforcement. \nAnother persistent issue affecting road users in Rodrigues, far more than on the \nmainland, is the presence of unattended animals on the roads. Only last week, a road accident \noccurred as a result of cattle crossing the roadway.  \nIt is therefore imperative that such situation, which is defined as offences under the \nRoad Traffic Act Part IX Section 156, be clearly redefined to include animals left unattended \nand that the offences are accompanied with more strict penalties. Increase in fines, for \n\n126 \n \nexample, and better enforcement in order to deter livestock owners from allowing these \nincidents to continue. \nToo often, owners face no consequences, enabling these violations to persist with \ncomplete impunity. Lastly, I cannot discuss amendments to the Road Traffic Act without \nemphasising the urgent need to upgrade our existing road infrastructure and construct new \nroads so that all Rodriguans can enjoy road facilities similar to those in the Republic. The \nRRA, our regional Government, up to now, included has done their best with the resources \navailable. But I appeal to the Central Government to continue its support as there are still \ncritical roads in Rodrigues that need to be built to connect citizens to essential services. \nFor example, in Anse Fémie, residents who owns vehicles often have to leave them \nmiles away from their homes due to the lack of proper access roads. Madam Speaker, hon. \nMembers, Rodrigues remains one of the regions with the lowest number of serious road \naccidents, as I stated. This is an achievement we must protect. But the rising number of \nvehicles, the growing use of two-wheelers and recent tragic accidents are clear signals. We \nmust strengthen our legislative framework and enforcement.  \nI, therefore, request that the Act be adopted, but to include those amendments to the \nRoad Traffic Act mentioned which are specific to Rodrigues. Only then can we truly ensure \nsafety, support development and guarantee that mobility goes hand in hand with \nresponsibility for every Rodriguan.  \nWith these words, I support the Bill submitted to the House. \nMadam Speaker: Very good! Before you were born, there were no vehicle on the road. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister: Premie fwa mo al laba, ti ena enn veikil! \nMadam Speaker: Exact! Only one! Anyway, people used to walk for long distances. \nThey were very fit!  \nThe next speaker, hon. Jugurnauth!  \n(6.50 p.m.) \nMr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River): Madam Speaker, \nthank you for giving me the opportunity to debate this Bill in this august Assembly. I rise \ntoday as a back bencher of the Government with a solemn responsibility to support the hon. \nMinister and the policies of the Government while also giving voice to the legitimate \n\n127 \n \nconcerns, aspirations and expectations of the constituents who have entrusted us with a \nmandate. \nMy duty is not merely to endorse, but to contribute, to refine, to question and to \npropose improvements that strengthen the Road Traffic (Amendment) Bill before us. Road \nsafety is not a theoretical matter. It is a national necessity. Every statistic represents a family \ndevastated, a life interrupted, a future altered. The reintroduction of the Penalty Point System \nis a step towards creating a culture of responsibility and discipline on our roads. \nA culture that many nations such as the UK, Singapore, Australia, Ireland and other \ncountries have successfully cultivated. For such a system to succeed in Mauritius, it must \ninspire confidence, Madam Speaker. It must be firm, but also fair. It must discipline repeated \noffenders without unfairly punishing those who make honest isolated mistakes.  \nI take for example, the offence of failing to wear a seatbelt while the safety imperative \nis an unquestionable. The sanction must be proportionate. \nI propose that the first offence attract a warning or fine, preserving penalty points \ndeduction for repeated offences. This progressive approach mirrors the best practice of \nseveral jurisdictions and avoid alienating responsible drivers who may commit an \nunintentional lapse. \nMadam Speaker, a similar logic applies to minor mechanical defect. A citizen may \nleave home with all lights functioning, only for a rear lamp to fail due to the vibration or poor \nroad safety conditions – should such a driver immediately lose points? \nIf safe city footage can confirm that the lights were functioning earlier, Madam \nSpeaker, then justice requires that such evidence be admissible. It is not leniency, it is \nfairness. \nThis brings me to a broader inconsistency. The law rightly penalises speeding. Yet, a \nvehicle fitness inspection, the accuracy of the speedometer, central to speed compliance, is \nnot systemically verified. How can we demand strict adherence to speed limit if the very \ninstrument used to measure speed is neglected during fitness checks? \nLegislative coherence demands that the system supporting enforcement be reliable as \nthe penalties being posed. Hon. Members, modern law must be supported by modern tools. \n\n128 \n \nMadam Speaker, I agree with the hon. Minister, he took on board the partnership with \nthe Ministry of Technology to introduce a dedicated national road safety mobile application. \nSuch an application provides real-time access to – \n(i) \nPenalty point status; \n(ii) \nNotify drivers of mechanical issues detected during inspections; \n(iii) \nFacilitate access to road safety footage for legitimate defence; \n(iv) \nCentralised payment of fines and bookings of fitness inspections; \n(v) \nStore digital vehicles document and dashcam footage. \nEnable enrolment in rehabilitation programme countries leading in digital governance \nlike Estonia, South Korea and many other countries have demonstrated how such platforms \nimprove transparency, efficiency and public trust. \nRehabilitation is another indispensable pillar. International experience shows that \neducation reduces repeated offenses more effectively than punitive measures alone. The Bill \nmakes provisions allowing drivers to redeem points throughout structured rehabilitation \ncourses in a progressive initiative that deserves full support. \nMadam Speaker, the Bill is a commendable step but like any legislation, it benefits \nfrom refinement. With the improvements proposed: proportionate penalties, technological \nsafeguard, legislative consistency and digital innovation, we can build a road safety \nframework that is both firm and just, modern and human. \nI, therefore, express my full support for this Bill with the conviction that the \namendments proposed today will be considered by my colleagues to serve our citizens and \nmake our roads safer for all. \nThank you, Madam Speaker, and I also note that the hon. Leader of the Opposition is \nagreeable partly with us. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Dr. Ms Thannoo! \nDr. Ms B. Thannoo: Madam Speaker, I beg to move for the adjournment of the debate. \nDr. Boolell rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \n\n129 \n \nDebate adjourned accordingly. \nADJOURNMENT \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Prime Minister! \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Friday 12 December 2025 at 3.30 p.m. \nThe Deputy Prime Minister rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned! \nThere is an adjournment matter. I promise, just a few minutes. I promise. Please, go \nahead hon. Ms Collet. \nMATTER RAISED \n(6.59. p.m.) \nRODRIGUES – CYBER SECURITY CHALLENGES – REMEDIAL MEASURES \nMs M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues): Merci beaucoup, Madame la \nprésidente. Rapidement avec votre indulgence, je souhaite soulever un problème et adresser \nune question à l’honorable ministre des Technologies et de l’information, de la \ncommunication et de l’innovation. À Rodrigues le numérique offre de nouvelles opportunités \nde communication et d’ouverture sur le monde mais, il expose aussi la population a des \nrisques. Le cyber harcèlement et la désinformation fragilisent la confiance, alimentent les \ndivisions et menacent la cohésion sociale. \nDans une île isolée où les ressources pour contrer ces dérives restent limitées, le défi est \nclair : profiter des avantages de la connectivité toute en protégeant la communauté surtout \nnotre jeunesse contre ces dangers. Il nous faut promouvoir l’unité et la sécurité dans notre île. \nJe souhaiterais demander à l’honorable ministre s’il peut indiquer, s’il compte \nenvisager des mesures afin d’assurer la protection de nos citoyens en ligne pour Rodrigues et \npouvoir mettre fin à la désinformation et violence numérique. Merci. \nMadam Speaker: Merci. L’honorable ministre! \nThe Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation (Dr. A. Ramtohul): I thank the hon. Member for this question. The issue of cyber security, \n\n130 \n \nmisinformation, disinformation and malinformation is a global issue and we all know that just \nlike many other developed countries are facing that problem, so is Mauritius and so is \nRodrigues. \nSo, the whole Republic is facing that problem. We actually connected Rodrigues to \ndigital map of the Republic through the MARS cable and we are very glad today that there \nare different connectivity options including low Earth orbits satellites as well which we added \nas part of what we are doing at the Ministry of Information Technology, Communication and \nInnovation. \nWe have an online platform for reporting cybercrimes, Madam Speaker, and that \nplatform earlier, while we captured the data and the statistics for the whole Republic, we did \nnot differentiate from those reports that were coming out from Rodrigues, for issues \nspecifically for Rodrigues. \nJust yesterday, we actually amended that application so that when somebody from \nRodrigues is reporting a case of cybercrime that person will have the opportunity to indicate \nthat the report is coming from Rodrigues. \nThis will enable us to collect data that and we can then devise policies which are \nevidence-based. So, this is the first point. The second point is that we also intend to create \nsome ambassadors who can in turn sensitise our people in Rodrigues, especially our children. \nStatistics has it that most of those people who suffer from cybercrime happen to be women as \nwe stated last week at the Parliament. \nTherefore, actually during the month of January, we intend to have a campaign for \nRodrigues and that campaign will focus on child online protection along with protecting the \nrest of the society. \nWe hold at heart the interests of Rodrigues and the legal amendments that we intend to \nbring, will be applicable to Rodrigues Island as well. Together with the hon. Prime Minister, \nwe are working on a strategy which can help not only reduce cybercrime but also help resolve \ncases of cybercrimes faster. \nMadam Speaker, this is my response to the question raised by the hon. Member. Thank \nyou. \nHon. Members: Bravo! Bravo! \n\n131 \n \nMadam Speaker: May I ask those who want to help me tomorrow, hon. Rookny, \nanybody who wants to help me tomorrow with the debate on Human Rights which is the last \nday for the 16 days, please, to come and see me immediately, so that we know what to do \ntomorrow morning. Thank you. \nNow, the House is really adjourned. \n At 7.02 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Friday 12 December 2025 \nat 3.30 p.m. \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nEQUAL OPPORTUNITIES TRIBUNAL – COMPOSITION – PENDING CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1228",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1228,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/1228) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the proposed relocation of the pig breeding farmers of Le Bouchon, he will state \nwhere matters stand.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Food and Agricultural Research and Extension Institute \n(FAREI) that there are, at present, 16 pig breeders operating at Le Bouchon, Camp Carol and \nMon Tresor Mon Desert who have to be relocated. 7 out of these 16 breeders operate at Le \nBouchon with a total number of 178 heads. \nI wish to inform the House that FAREI conducted preliminary site surveys to assess the \nland suitability for pig breeding taking into consideration disposal of pig waste. \n\n148 \n \nI am informed that two sites were identified at Cluny and Le Val. However, both sites \nwere found to be unsuitable due to high water table and presence of rivulet, which would \nresult in ground water contamination. My Ministry is therefore still looking for alternate \nsuitable sites.  \nIn parallel, meetings have been held with the breeders in respect of relocation of the \nsite.  \nA Technical Committee, chaired by the Permanent Secretary of my Ministry, has \nalready been set up, comprising of various authorities, to look into pig breeding in a holistic \nmanner taking into consideration infrastructural support and pig waste management. The \nrecommendation of the Technical Committee will subsequently be submitted for a policy \ndecision on implementation thereof.",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1229",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1229,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/1229) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Fédération Mauricienne de Judo, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to where matters stand regarding \nthe 18 clubs seeking affiliation thereto, indicating – \n(a) \nthe ruling of the Sports Arbitration Tribunal in relation thereto, and  \n(b) \nwhether any decision has been taken pertaining to the recognition thereof and, if \nnot, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nJAWARHALALL NEHRU HOSPITAL – POWER FAILURE – CAUSES & \nMEASURES ENVISAGED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1230",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1230,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/1230) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the sudden power failure \nwhich occurred at the Jawarhalall Nehru Hospital in the night of the 2nd to 3rd December \n2025, he will state the causes thereof, indicating the measures being envisaged by his \nMinistry to avoid the recurrence of similar incidents.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed that on the night of 02 December 2025 at around 23:45 hours due \nto a short circuit caused by sparks arising from old wires and aged circuit breakers in the \nmain electric panel, there was a total black out at the Jawaharlall Nehru Hospital. \nThe Energy Services Division was immediately informed and the engineers got to task \nto restore the power supply. At 05:30 hours in the morning of the 3rd December 2025, partial \npower supply was restored in the ICU, Operation Theatre, Casualty Department and most of \n\n144 \n \nthe wards. However, certain areas such as the Laboratory, NICU, Health Records Section, \nWard 1.6 and administrative block were still without power supply.  \nBy 13:30 hours on the same day, power supply was restored fully in the hospital. I must \nmention that critical equipment in ICUs and NICU are equipped with an autonomous battery \nbackup, hence these equipment kept running. \nI also wish to inform the House that necessary actions were taken to shift patients to \nother institutions; 2 patients from the ICU were transferred to SAJ and SSRN hospitals, 3 \nbabies from the NICU were transferred to SAJ, Dr. Jeetoo and SSRN hospitals. \nI am further informed that the ESD has recommended a complete renewal of the main \nelectrical panel to avoid such a situation in the future. \nI wish to reassure the hon. Member and the population in general that we are leaving no \nstone unturned to take urgent remedial action. \nOn the medical side, I am informed that all due attention was given to ensure the safety \nof the in-patients and out-patients. \nI wish to inform the House that there had been a general 'laissez aller' at the level of \nmaintenance in all hospitals during the last 10 years and we witnessed the result of such a \nnegligence. I will take the example of Dr. A. G Jeetoo Hospital which was constructed in \n2012 with a completely new HVAC (Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning) System. \nHowever, due to lack of maintenance the system completely failed. Now, we need to carry \nout a complete repair of the system which will cost government a hefty sum of about Rs300 \nmillion. \nWe cannot continue with the same mentality as the outgoing regime. We are here to \nbring about a change in the system. This is why we are coming up with the idea of a \nSpecialised Agency which will look into all aspects of Operation and Maintenance in all \nRegional Hospitals and their subsidiary Health Institutions which, as at date, are Valued at \nRs60 billion. And, I am sure the population will bear testimony of our way of governing. \nAllow me to seize this opportunity to thank the personnel of my Ministry, the staff of \nthe Jawaharlall Nehru Hospital and the ESD Staff and Engineers from the Ministry of \nNational Infrastructure who worked relentlessly to deal with the sudden power failure at the \nJawaharlall Nehru Hospital which occurred in the night of the 2nd and 3rd December 2025. \nMy appreciation also goes to the in-patients and their relatives who showed proof of \nunderstanding at this uncommon event. \n \n\n145 \n \nWORKPLACE INSPECTIONS – COMPLIANCE & MONITORING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1231",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1231,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/1231) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to workplace \ninspection, he will table the list thereof carried out by each department/section of his Ministry \nsince June 2025 to date, indicating – \n(a) \nin each case, the – \n(i) \nname and address of the establishment;  \n(ii) \nprincipal sector of activity, and  \n(iii) number of employees gender-wise, by age group, grade-wise or by \noccupational category and any other relevant employment particulars as \nrecorded during the inspection, and  \n(b) \nthe actions taken in case of non-compliance with the laws and regulations, \nincluding the number of employers prosecuted, if any.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nDISTRICT COUNCILS – SUSPENDED STAFF – PENDING CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1232",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1232,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/1232) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) \nasked the Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to staff members of \ndistrict councils suspended from duty, he will state the number of pending cases thereof at his \nMinistry, indicating – \n(a)  the main causes thereof and  \n(b)  whether consideration will be given to fast-tracking the resolution thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCHALINE STREET, SOUILLAC – DAMAGED BRIDGE – 07 NOVEMBER 2023 – \nRECONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1233",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1233,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/1233) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the reconstruction of \nthe bridge that was damaged on 7 November 2023 following torrential rains at Chaline street, \nin Souillac, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to where matters.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed that, during the torrential rain event of November 2024, the \nbridge at Chaline Street was damaged. \n\n146 \n \nThe Land Drainage Authority had, on 22 November 2023 conveyed its approval to the \nDistrict Council of Savanne to reconstruct the bridge at Chaline Street, Souillac and also \nupgrade existing surrounding drainage network as an emergency project. \nFollowing a competitive bidding exercise among 5 potential bidders, the contract was \nawarded to Super Builder Co. Ltd on 13 January 2024. \nThe reconstruction works commenced on 14 January 2024 and were expected to be \ncompleted by 10 May 2024. However, to date, the reconstruction of the bridge has not yet \nstarted due to an encroachment by a private garage within the bridge alignment. A case has \nbeen lodged by the Council for the demolition of the said garage. The case was called on 20 \nNovember 2025 at the District Court of Savanne. However, due to the absence of \nrepresentatives from the Land Drainage Authority, the case has been postponed to 28 May \n2026.  \nMeanwhile, the contractor has suggested undertaking underpinning works pending the \noutcome of the case, and this proposal is still under consideration. As the case is still \nongoing, the completion date cannot be determined. \n \nTAXI OPERATORS WELFARE FUND – CONTRIBUTIONS – SUM DISBURSED – \nBENEFICIARIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1234",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1234,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/1234) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Taxi Operators Welfare Fund, he will – \n (a)  for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the quantum of \ncontributions collected from taxi operators as at to date, indicating the total sum \ndisbursed therefrom under each scheme and corresponding number of \nbeneficiaries, and  \n(b)  state whether a review regarding contribution thereto is being envisaged and, if \nso, indicate where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMR D. B., ADVISER – ARREST & DETENTION – SUSPENSION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1235",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1235,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/1235) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to Mr D. B., \nAdviser at his Ministry, he will state whether the latter has been suspended from duty \nfollowing his arrest and detention at the Stanley Police Station on 21 August 2025. \n\n147",
      "answer": "Reply: I wish to inform the House that Mr. D. B. has been appointed as Adviser on a \none-year contractual basis at the Ministry of National Infrastructure as from 21 April 2025.  \nI am advised, through a communication received from the Commissioner of Police \ndated 04 December 2025, that Mr. D. B. was arrested and detained by the Police on 21 \nAugust 2025 following a complaint lodged against him. He was thereafter released on bail on \n22 August 2025. I am further informed that on the same day, the complainant informed the \nPolice that she did not wish to pursue the matter any further.  \nIn the circumstances and pending any further official developments, no action has been \ninitiated against Mr. D. B. However, I wish to point out that suspension from duty does not \narise for officers employed on a contractual basis. The situation is nonetheless being \nmonitored.  \nPORT AREA – CRUISE TERMINAL – TAXI OPERATORS –RESTRICTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1236",
      "sitting_id": "09-december-2025",
      "date": "2025-12-09",
      "year": 2025,
      "day_of_week": "",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1236,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/1236) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the taxi operators, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number thereof allowed to \nwork in the Port Area, especially, at the Cruise Terminal, indicating – \n(a)  their normal base of operation, and  \n(b)  whether there is any restriction for taxi operators based in the northern region to \navail themselves of this opportunity and if so, indicate the reasons therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nLE BOUCHON – PIG BREEDING FARMERS – SITE RELOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-09-december-2025"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/1",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 1,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/1) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \ndelayed ratification of the Chagos Archipelago treaty signed in May 2025, he will state the \nexpected consequences thereof in terms of budget deficit and balance of payment following \nthe non-disbursement of the Rs 10 billion provided in the Budget 2025-26.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I will reply to \nParliamentary Questions B/1, B/2 and B/21 together, as they all relate to the same subject \nmatter. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nThe Prime Minister: As the House is aware, on 22 May 2025, Mauritius and the \nUnited Kingdom signed an Agreement concerning the Chagos Archipelago. Under the \nAgreement, the United Kingdom recognises the sovereignty of Mauritius over the Chagos \nArchipelago, including Diego Garcia. \nThe Agreement also stipulates that as sovereign, Mauritius has authorised the United \nKingdom to exercise, with respect to Diego Garcia, the rights and authorities of Mauritius \nwhich are required for the long-term, secure and effective operation of the military base on \nthat island.   \nThe Agreement has to be ratified for it to enter into force. The United Kingdom has not \nyet ratified. As you know, there have been some difficulties.  \nSince the Bill entitled “Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory \nBill” has not yet been adopted by the UK Parliament, the Agreement is therefore not yet \nratified in full.  \nOn the assumption that the Chagos Treaty would be ratified, an amount of Rs10 \nbillion was included in the revenue of the 2025-2026 Budget. \nHowever, due to the delay in the ratification of the Chagos Treaty, there will, of \ncourse, be a shortfall in revenue of Rs10 billion in this fiscal year.  Other things being equal, \nthe budget deficit will increase by the same amount, that is, 1.3% of GDP. This will in turn \nlead to an increase in public sector debt by the same percentage.  \nSimilarly, the delay in the ratification of the Treaty will result in the lower balance of \npayments inflows of a corresponding amount, putting additional pressure on the foreign \nexchange market. \nMadam Speaker, in order to mitigate the impact of this shortfall, the Ministry of \nFinance is already taking a number of actions namely – \n(a) \nenforcing stricter control over recurrent expenditure and reducing wastage; \n(b) \nreprioritising capital projects by implementing high-impact, growth-enhancing \nprojects and deferring lower-priority ones; \n(c) \nexercising tighter financial control over public bodies to improve efficiency and \ncontain budgetary transfers to them, and \n(d) \noptimising the existing cash balances across the public sector so as to limit new \nborrowings. \nIt is our hope, Madam Speaker, that the Chagos Treaty will be ratified at the earliest \npossible opportunity so that the Agreement can enter into force and the provisions can be \nfully implemented.   \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Etwareea! \nMr Etwareea: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. I would like to know whether the \nGovernment is talking about all these probable problems in the international organisations \nlike the IMF, World Bank, of the outcomes of these difficulties? \nThe Prime Minister: I am sorry, I did not catch the last bit. \nMr Etwareea: I am talking about these problems in the international organisations like \nthe IMF and also to Moody’s. \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, yes, they are well aware of it. We are constantly in touch \nwith them. I can tell you both the FS and Economic Adviser from the PMO are talking to \nthem. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Seeburn wants a question? Your question was replied. \nMr Seeburn: Yes, Madam Speaker. It has been replied. \nMadam Speaker: Do you want a supplementary? You are all right? \nOkay, hon. Dr. Ms Daureeawo? No? Very good! \nHon. Leader of the Opposition! \nMr Lesjongard: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Will the hon. Prime Minister now agree \nthat including that Rs10 billion compensation for the Chagos deal in our national budget was \npresumptuous first of all and badly advised? \nThe Prime Minister: No, I do not agree. It was already agreed. We have signed the \ntreaty. It was only going through the ratification process when President Trump did not agree \nwith certain things. \n We have been talking to them. We have agreed, for example, that they wanted to have \nan additional member on the Commission. We have agreed. Then they wanted two members, \nwe have agreed. Then, they wanted to be able to vote on that Commission; that also we have \nagreed. We are trying to make sure that the treaty is actually ratified. \nMr A. Duval: Yes, Madam Speaker, I have a question. \nMadam Speaker:  Yes, on that issue? Alright, hon. A. Duval. \nMr A. Duval: Thank you, Madam Speaker. There have been talks of possibility of \ngoing to lodge a case by Mauritius should the United States continue to veto, well, to block \nthe signature. Can the hon. Prime Minister confirm whether this has been discussed at the \nlevel of the Mauritian government and what would be the implications? \nThe Prime Minister: Once while I was speaking to the press, I think somebody from \nthe press asked me that question, and I did say we are looking at all the options and don’t \nthink that we do not have options. \nWhat we have done apart from our lawyers at the State Law Office with the hon. \nAttorney General, we also have an international team of lawyers who are actually looking at \nall the aspects, all the options, and from then on, we will do what has to be done. \nI think it was in the press in England that we are going to sue – that is not true. \nCHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO TREATY – RATIFICATION DELAY – FINANCIAL \nCONSEQUENCES & IMPACT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/2",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 2,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/2) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the delay \nin the ratification of the Chagos Archipelago treaty signed in May 2025, he will state whether \nGovernment has assessed the financial consequences and impact thereof on our economy \nand, if so, indicate the mitigating measures being envisaged or taken in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/1) \nMadam Speaker: Yes, all right. Hon. Fourth Member for Port Louis North & \nMontagne Longue. Yes, your time now! \nMAURITIUS POLICE FORCE – BODY-WORN & VEHICLE CAMERAS – \nSTATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/3",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 3,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/3) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Mauritius Police Force, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to – \n(a) \nwhere matters stand regarding the proposal to equipping Police Officers with \ntasers and body-worn cameras, indicating in each case, the –  \n(i) \nnumber thereof to be procured and timeframe therefor, and \n(ii) \npolice units to be equipped therewith, and \n(b) \nwhether consideration is being given to equipping police vehicles with on-board \ncameras and recording equipment.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I wish to refer the Hon. Member to my reply to \nParliamentary Question B/1127 at the Sitting of 02 December 2025 wherein I had indicated \nthat a Technical Committee had been set up by the Commissioner of Police to work on the \nmodalities for the implementation of both tasers and body-worn cameras.  \nIn regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat the Technical Committee has recommended the introduction of tasers for use by frontline \nPolice Officers as a less-lethal alternative to firearms and is now working on operational \nguidelines and legal framework.  \nAs regards body-worn cameras, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that the \nPolice will use multimedia radios which are equipped with camera features. The Technical \nCommittee has almost completed the drafting of the Standard Operating Procedures for the \nuse of these cameras. Trial tests have already been conducted successfully.  \nI am also informed by the Commissioner of Police that the Police multimedia radios \nare being used as body-worn cameras on a pilot basis. Under the Training of Trainers \nProgramme, a total, I think, of 250 Police Officers from different units have been trained on \nthe proper use of the radio as body-worn cameras and they will subsequently be able to train \nother Police Officers on the proper use thereof. \n By the end of this month, the cameras can be used as a protective tool by Police \nOfficers who are more exposed to risk of aggressions and other incidents which may result in \nfrivolous complaints.  \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am further informed by the Commissioner of \nPolice that the radio communication system on-board Police vehicles will be upgraded and \nwill include cameras having video recording capabilities and the project is being finalised. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr A. Duval: Yes, Madam Speaker, I was aware, in fact, that the Police is using this \nradio, which we see on the belt of Police Officers around Port Louis. The issue is, Madam \nSpeaker, it was not meant to be a body-worn camera. It has a very different usage than a \nbody-worn camera. The first issue is that it is strangled around… \nMadam Speaker: Question! Question! \nMr A. Duval: Is the hon. Prime Minister aware that it is tied around their neck and \ntherefore does not have a clear image compared to body cameras which are securely fastened \non the body vest of Police Officers? \nSecondly, is the hon. Prime Minister able to say what is the recording capacity of \nfootage of these multi radio camera equipment and whether it does record sound adequately \nso that tomorrow it may be used as evidence? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Prime Minister!  \nThe Prime Minister: I have been told by the Commissioner of Police that there have \nbeen trial tests and that they were successful. So, I will have to further investigate whether \nyou think, from what I understand, that these multi radio cameras are not adequate. \nMadam Speaker: You will look into it. \nThe Prime Minister: From what I understand, the fact that they will be able to actually \nfilm whatever is happening should suit its purpose, but maybe we will have to look into it \nfurther. \nMadam Speaker: It can be improved, I am sure. \nMr A. Duval: I have a second question. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! \nMr A. Duval: Yes, it is, in fact, the point because Police Officers around the world … \nMadam Speaker: Do not make statement! \nMr A. Duval: It is a question. Is the Hon. Prime Minister aware that Police Officers \naround the world in modern countries have dedicated body-worn cameras which are sold and \nused for that purpose? Therefore, it would be a missed opportunity to recycle these radios \nwhen we are trying in fact to render the system much more efficient and to protect citizens \nand Police Officers alike, especially with the degrading… \nMadam Speaker: Social unrest or whatever. \nMr A. Duval: … security, in fact. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, I am sure the hon. Prime Minister will do that. You will look \ninto it. \nThe Prime Minister: I understand the point that the hon. Member is making because if \nit is there on the site, whether it will actually be able to film it properly. I will look into the \nmatter. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister!  \n \nSYNTHETIC DRUGS – CONSUMERS & DEALERS ARRESTED – REGIONS \nAFFECTED – RAIDED LABORATORIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/4",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 4,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/4) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South &  \nPort Louis Central) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and \nExternal Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands \nwhether, in regard to synthetic drugs, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to, over the past eighteen months, the number of – \n(a) \nconsumers thereof arrested, indicating the – \n(i) regions with high prevalence rates of consumption thereof, and  \n(ii) number of dealers thereof arrested, and \n(b) \nillegal synthetic drug laboratories known, raided and destroyed.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with regard to parts (a) and (a) (i) of the \nquestion, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that from 01 September 2024 to 12 \nMarch 2026, 822 synthetic drug consumers have been arrested, most of whom were from the \nregions of Upper Plaine Wilhems, Grand Port and Port Louis North. \nIn regard to part (a) (ii) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat the quantity and street value of dangerous drugs secured are taken into consideration to \ndetermine whether an accused is a dealer or whether he is a trafficker.  If a large quantity of \ndrugs is secured and its street value is less than Rs1 million, the suspect is treated as a dealer.  \nIf the street value exceeds Rs1 million, the suspect is considered to be a trafficker.  During \nthe same period, 879 dealers and 31 traffickers were arrested for dealing and trafficking in \nsynthetic drugs. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that the Police have raided \nseveral premises where utensils used for the mixture of derivatives to make synthetic drugs \nand the consumption thereof were secured. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Prime Minister, in regard \nto the solvents that are being used in the manufacturing and production of synthetic drugs, as \nhas been found by the forensic lab, will the Government consider having strict regulation as \nto its sale at retail level or even consider a ban so that we will see a decrease in the number of \ndrug addicts on the streets? Thank you. \nThe Prime Minister: I should add that there is going to be a new forensic lab – you \nshould probably know, it is nearly ready – but also, since February of this year, we have a \nnew director, Dr. Seetohul, who has assumed leadership of that lab. He is a distinguished \ntoxicologist with over 20 years of experience in the UK. He is in another diaspora, he has left \nthe UK, and come to Mauritius to look at the lab. We have lots and lots of shortcomings, he \nhas already seen them; lots of shortcomings in the lab. He is trying to correct this. \nMadam Speaker: Are you happy? Yes, last one! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, it is a very short question. Will the hon. Prime Minister see \nwith the Commissioner of Police whether, the tracking of zombies, who line up the streets of \nmany of our regions in Mauritius, can be tracked down to the dealers or traffickers and arrest \nthem on spot; whether the law should be amended or so, but I think that would help to bring \ndown the number of synthetic users on our roads? \n The Prime Minister: I will certainly pass that information to the Commissioner of \nPolice. I should add that there is a new person at the head of ADSU at the moment who is \nvery effective. He has already given lots of results. He is an ASP, Mr Seebaluck. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, thank you. So, next question will be for Mr Edouard from \nRodrigues! \nRODRIGUES – WATER PROJECTS – FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/5",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 5,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/5) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime Minister, \nMinister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the water projects in \nRodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the quantum of the \nfinancial assistance sought by the Rodrigues Regional Assembly from the Mauritius \nInvestment Corporation Ltd., indicating the quantum thereof approved and disbursed as at to \ndate and when the remaining balance thereof will be disbursed. \nMadam Speaker: Yes!",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, Government remains firmly committed to \nensuring inclusive and a balanced development across the Republic of Mauritius, including \nRodrigues.  As stated at Paragraph 64 of the Government Programme of 2025–2029, we are \ngiving special attention to the water situation in Rodrigues.  Accordingly, financial resources \nare being directed towards key projects in Rodrigues, namely the installation of new \ndesalination plants, the construction of new reservoirs, the improvement of the distribution \nnetwork, and also the expansion of the storage capacity in the island. \nMadam Speaker, the Mauritius Investment Corporation Ltd had agreed – that was with \nthe previous Government – to allocate an amount of Rs1 billion to develop the water sector in \nRodrigues, although this, I must say, was not in its core mandate. Its core mandate was to \ngenerate return on investment in strategic enterprises, but the previous Government decided \nthat they would move away from the core mandate and allocate Rs1 billion for the water \nsector. \nSince the agreement was signed in 2021 between the Mauritius Investment Corporation \nLtd and the Rodrigues Public Utilities Corporation, which is a company set up by the \nRodrigues Regional Assembly, Government has continued the implementation of the water \nprojects in Rodrigues, and an amount of Rs540 million was earmarked for the first phase of \nthe project.  I am informed that, as at to date, the Mauritius Investment Corporation Ltd has \ndisbursed Rs310 million to the Rodrigues Public Utilities Corporation and that the remaining \nRs230 million will be disbursed by the end of this financial year. \nI am further informed that with a view to speeding up the disbursement of funds, the \nRodrigues Public Utilities Corporation Ltd has been requested to submit all the necessary \ndocuments required by the MIC for the processing of claims in a timely manner.  \nIn the second phase, the remaining amount, that is, Rs460 million would be considered \nfor land-based water projects on the island. The projects to be financed in the second stage \nhave been worked out by the Rodrigues Public Utilities Corporation Ltd, and a fresh \nagreement will have to be signed for the disbursement of these funds. These investments will \nsignificantly enhance water production, water storage, and distribution capacity in Rodrigues \nand contribute to improving water security on the island. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Edouard? One moment, one question. \nMr Edouard: I thank the hon. Prime Minister for his reply. Will the hon. Prime \nMinister address the problem of delays in the release of money which impact on project \ncompletion and also has a great incidence on the spending capacity of the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly? Thank you. \nThe Prime Minister: Certainly, Madam Speaker. This is why they have been informed \nto speed up the disbursement of funds; the Rodrigues Public Utilities Corporation Ltd has \nbeen requested. They have not submitted all the necessary documents; they will need to give \nall the necessary documents which are required by the MIC for the processing of the claims. \nANNOUNCEMENT \nSITTING OF 17.03.26 – PNQ – RELATED SUPPLEMENTARY QUESTIONS \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Before Mr Jhummun puts his question, I have to advise \nthe House – and the hon. Prime Minister knows – that the hon. Prime Minister was to reply to \nPQs B/26, B/29, B/34, B/43, B/44, B/47, B/51, and B/61 on the issue that he just replied to at \nPNQ time. So, what I will do is after Mr Jhummun has put his question or supplementary, \nwhichever, I will allow all these Members to put their supplementary, but try and watch the \ntime nonetheless. Okay?  \nMIDDLE EAST TENSIONS – ECONOMIC REPERCUSSIONS – CONTINGENCY \nPLANS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/6",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 6,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/6) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nongoing war in the Middle East and the probable repercussions thereof on our economy, he \nwill state the contingency plans being envisaged in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PNQ) \nMadam Speaker: Mr Jhummun! \nMr Jhummun: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I think the hon. Prime Minister has \nalready answered that question. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nMr Jhummun: But I want to put my supplementary. May I? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, but related! \nMr Jhummun: So, in order to ensure a better supply of oil… \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: No, he has… \n(Interruptions) \nLet me… \n(Interruptions) \nMay I?  \n(Interruptions) \nMay I? I am the one who is going to decide! \n(Interruptions) \nHe just… \n(Interruptions) \nWe are wasting time! B/6 and now you put your supplementary because you said… he \nhas already replied! He has already replied. So, please put your supplementary. And do not do \nmy job!  \n(Interruptions) \nChut! \nMr Jhummun: Okay, so in order to ensure a better supply of oil and petroleum \nproducts, can we envisage to come again with our own tanker, special ships bearing \nMauritian flags, as we had in previous days like Betamax, which was terminated by the \nprevious Government? \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nThe Prime Minister: Very good question! In fact, I am told, again, just like Mangalore, \nthe Betamax company is not interested. They are actually serving Singapore and the far East \nand their tankers are completely booked. This is our loss because of the irresponsible actions \nthey took; there we are. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, Mr François. \n(Interruptions) \nYou do not … Chut!  \nMr François had a question. He has no supplementary.  \nMr Juman? Yes? For B/34. \nSTC – GAS OIL, MOGAS, JET FUEL & LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM – SUPPLY \nDISRUPTION ASSESSMENT – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/7",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 7,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/7) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Director of Audit, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nthe number of overseas missions he has undertaken over the past two years, indicating in each \ncase, the – \n(a) \ntotal cost thereof, and  \n(b) \noutcome or benefits derived therefrom.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMadam Speaker: B/8! Your second question, hon. Jhummun! \nINDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS – MIC INVESTMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/8",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 8,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/8) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nIndependent Power Producers, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius \nInvestment Corporation Ltd., information as to the quantum of funds it has invested in or \nadvanced thereto through their sister companies or their group holding.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I will reply to \nParliamentary Questions B/8 and B/15 together, as they relate to the same subject matter. \nWith regard to Parliamentary Question B/8, I am informed by the Bank of Mauritius \nthat the Mauritius Investment Corporation Ltd (MIC) has not made any direct investments or \nprovided funding to Independent Power Producers (IPPs). \nHowever, it has purchased land from some companies associated with certain IPPs. \nMoreover, it has also invested in equity and debt instruments of some associated companies. \nOver the period 2020 to 2024, the MIC has purchased land and invested a total amount \nof Rs12.8 billion as follows – \n(a) \nRs7.8 billion for the acquisition of land (Omnicane Limited – Rs4.4 billion, \nMedine Limited – Rs3.4 billion); \n(b) \nRs3.2 \nbillion \nas \nbond \nsubscription \n(Riveo \nHospitality \nLtd \n–  \nRs1.1 billion, Long Beach Resort Ltd – Rs2 billion and Casela Limited – Rs140 \nmillion), and \n(c) \nRs1.8 billion as equity investments (EastCoast Hotel Investment Ltd). \nI am also informed, Madam Speaker, that out of the Rs3.2 billion bond subscription, \nRs1.24 billion have been fully redeemed. \nAs regards Parliamentary Question B/15, I am informed by the Bank of Mauritius that \nthe MIC had invested Rs57.8 billion in various investment instruments. These include Rs27.7 \nbillion in equity investments, Rs22 billion in bond subscription, Rs7.8 billion in the \nacquisition of land and Rs300 million in private equity funds. \nFollowing the decision taken by the new Management of the Bank of Mauritius to \ncease new funding commitments and review MIC’s strategic orientation, the MIC has \ninitiated a disinvestment strategy.  \nAs part of this strategy, the MIC has engaged with bond issuers to explore the \npossibility of early redemption of outstanding bonds, with a view to recouping and \nsafeguarding its investments. The House may also note that a number of companies have \nvoluntarily approached the MIC to proceed with early redemption of their bonds. \nAccording to the Bank of Mauritius, as at date, 19 companies have already redeemed \ntheir bonds for a total amount of Rs6.7 billion. There is thus an outstanding balance of Rs15.2 \nbillion, out of which, Rs135 million will be redeemed by two companies during this year. \nI am further informed that the MIC has already communicated to the companies that no \nextension will be granted upon maturity and that the bonds will be redeemed as scheduled. \nI am tabling the list of entities that have benefited from investment from the MIC. \nMadam Speaker, from the list of companies that still owes the MIC, the total sum owed \nby BSP School of Accountancy & Management Ltd, Kuros Construction Solutions Ltd, \nDhyanavartam Ltd and Star Knitwear Group Ltd amounts to around Rs2.36 billion.  We still \ndo not know when these funds will be refunded.  The more so that some companies like Star \nKnitwear Group Ltd and BSP School of Accountancy & Management Ltd have already gone \ninto receiverships. \nThis speaks volumes of the management of public funds of the previous government. \nMadam Speaker: Is that okay? Hon. Dr. Ms Daureeawo, do you have a \nsupplementary? No. The Prime Minister’s answer was alright? Okay. \nMIDDLE EAST TENSIONS – MAURITIAN ECONOMY – IMPACT ASSESSMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/9",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 9,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/9) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Mauritian economy, he will state the assessed impact thereon of the ongoing \ninternational conflict in the Middle East, indicating – \n(a) \nthe measures contemplated by Government to address the rising cost of living, \nparticularly, the increase in food prices and basic commodities, and  \n(b) \nwhether targeted relief mechanisms are being considered for the benefit of low-\nincome households.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PNQ) \nMadam Speaker: Let me try a last question. B/10, Mr Beejan! \nMR N.K. – ALLEGED DRUG-RELATED CASE – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/10",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 10,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/10) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre D'or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nalleged drug-related case against one Mr. N.K., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Commissioner of Police, information as to where matters stand in relation to the \ninquiry initiated thereinto.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat, based on intelligence obtained on 09 March 2017, a joint operation was carried out at the \nMauritius Container Terminal by the Anti-Drug and Smuggling Unit (ADSU) and Anti-\nNarcotics Section of the Mauritius Revenue Authority. Following a search, 118 packets of \ndrugs suspected to be heroin weighing around 119.6 kgs worth approximately Rs1.8 billion \nwere found inside six sand blasting metal cylinders. The drug consignment had arrived \nonboard the vessel MSC IVANA from South Africa on 04 March 2017.  \nI am also informed that Police had carried out an enquiry and eight suspects were \narrested from March to May 2017, and one of them was Mr N.K. They were provisionally \ncharged with the offence of Drug Dealing with Aggravating Circumstances to wit: Causing \nheroin to be imported with an averment of trafficking and/or Money Laundering. \nI am further informed that the investigation into the particular case is complex as it \ninvolves international ramifications. Police had sought mutual legal assistance from South \nAfrica and the United Kingdom to obtain documentary evidence. The evidence was obtained \nfrom South Africa and the United Kingdom in August of 2021 and February 2022, \nrespectively.  \nI am also informed that, upon completion of the investigation into the case involving \nMr N.K. and four other persons, on 25 August 2023, the then Commissioner of Police had \nsubmitted the case file to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions for advice. On 11 \nApril 2024, the case was lodged before the Court of Assizes and Mr N.K. is being prosecuted \nfor the following offences – \n(i) \nDrug Dealing with Aggravating Circumstances Organising the importation of \ndangerous drug (heroin) with an averment of trafficking, and \n(ii) \nconspiracy to do an act which is unlawful to wit: to procure the importation of \nheroin. \nOn 26 June 2024, the case was called for Mention for the first time and was postponed \nto 24 November 2025, in other words, postponed for more than one year. The case has now \nbeen fixed for trial, believe it or not, on 17 May 2027 before the Court of Assizes.   \nSince 15 April, Mr N.K. is detained in police custody. \nMadam Speaker, two accused, namely Mr F.T.R. and Mrs C.B., had been prosecuted \nbefore the Intermediate Court and had been convicted to 3 years’ penal servitude for money \nlaundering on 29 November 2018 and 17 January 2020.  \nOne accused, namely Mr O.R. is being prosecuted for Money Laundering before the \nIntermediate Court.   \nAs regards the remaining accused persons, I am informed that advice has been sought \nfrom the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions on 25 August 2023 and 02 December \n2025, and the advice has not been tendered yet. \nI am also informed that police is still looking for one suspect, Mr H.K.R., involved in \nthat case. That person was brought in for inquiry purposes prior to the arrest of Mr N.K. \nHowever, Mr H.K.R. was allowed to go back for lack of evidence. He was subsequently \nreported missing. \nThe case of Mr N.K. has been dragging on for far too long, Madam Speaker. \nIrrespective of their complexity, cases have to be determined in a timely manner. Therefore, \nwe will be introducing appropriate piece of legislation for trials to be determined within a \nreasonable time. This has been criticised by Lord Mackay in the past. But still, we have the \nsame situation. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Mr Beejan! One question! \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Prime Minister kindly find out \nwith MRA Customs on whether, key members of the MRA Narcotics Department, who made \nthe seizure of the drug in the gas cylinders, were transferred to other units within one month \nof seizure? Thank you. \nThe Prime Minister: In fact, I can answer, because I did press conference on that. \nThey were transferred. It was the famous guy who brought the packets: Dewdanee. And Mr \nJagai was then transferred immediately. We did a press conference on that. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Mr Quirin, please, your question! That’s the last question. \n(Interruptions) \nINTERNATIONAL CASINO EXHIBITION 2026 – MAURITIAN DELEGATION – \nCOST & PER DIEM ALLOWANCES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/11",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 11,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/11) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nInternational Casino Exhibition in Barcelona held in January 2026, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Gambling Regulatory Authority, information as to the –  \n(a)  names of the officers who attended same, indicating in each case, the cost \nincurred in terms of air tickets and per diem allowances, and  \n(b)  benefit for Mauritius of the said participation.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Gambling Regulatory \nAuthority that the 2026 International Casino Exhibition, widely known as ICE, was held from \n19 to 21 January 2026, in Barcelona, Spain.  \nAs regards part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Gambling Regulatory \nAuthority that its Board, at its 4th meeting held on 13 November 2025, approved the \nparticipation of a delegation of four persons to attend the Exhibition. \nThe participants were – \n(i) \nMrs Ringadoo; \n(ii) \nMrs Maudarbaccus;  \n(iii) Mr Arjoon Niranjan, and \n(iv) Mrs Choytah Darshinee. \nThe cost of air tickets for Mrs Darshinee amounted to Rs60,400, while for the other \nthree participants, the cost was Rs53,800 for each. The per diem of Rs78,003.95 was paid to \neach participant. The total expenditure for the mission therefore amounted to Rs533,916. \nConcerning part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Gambling Regulatory \nAuthority that the 2026 ICE provided a unique opportunity for Mauritius to learn from its \npeers, the best practices pertaining to the following, amongst others – \n(i) \ncombatting money laundering, illegal betting, fraud and cyber security threats; \n(ii) \nresponsible gambling and consumer protection; \n(iii) regulatory technologies, and \n(iv) adoption of artificial intelligence in relation to monitoring of remote sports \nbetting and gambling operators. \nAs regards the outcome of the participation, ICE is helping the GRA to – \n(i) \nreview its regulatory and operational framework to align same with international \nbest practices;  \n(ii) \nadopt new regulatory technologies for the regulation of online gambling, and \n(iii) enhance investigative capacities to better detect fraudulent activities and conduct \ninvestigations. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, alright? One question. \nMr Quirin: Une question supplémentaire ! L’honorable Premier ministre peut-il dire à \nla Chambre, vu le contexte actuel d’austérité, ne pense-t-il pas que le déplacement d’une telle \ndélégation est totalement injustifié à un moment où, nous le savons tous, les difficultés \néconomiques et financières dont fait face le pays ? \n The Prime Minister: This did not come out of the government fund as such. It was \nfrom the fund of the GRA itself. They have provided their own funds. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Time is up! \nI am suspending the Sitting for one and a half hour. \nAt 1.01 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.36 p.m., with Madam Speaker on the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Please be seated.  \nThe Table has been advised that the following PQs have been withdrawn: B/12, B/13, \nB/17, B/18, B/19, and B/23. \nI should have said that earlier. I am sorry. \nNow, we have questions to hon. Ministers.  \nMIDDLE-EAST CONFLICT – MAURITIANS’ SAFETY – DIPLOMATIC \nMEASURES BY GOVERNMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/12",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 12,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/12) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Extended \nContinental Shelf in the Mascarene Plateau Region, he will state whether, during the recent \nState Visit of His Excellency the President of the Republic of Seychelles to Mauritius – \n(a)  the progress of the Joint Management Area (JMA) framework was discussed;  \n(b)  new agreements or Memoranda of Understanding were signed to further explore \nand exploit the natural resources within the JMA, and  \n(c)  the exploration for potential petroleum and the conduct of seismic surveys were \ndiscussed.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPALMAR PUBLIC BEACH – 25 JAN 2026 INCIDENTS – ENFORCEMENT \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/13",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 13,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/13) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the incidents of 25 January 2026 at Palmar Public Beach, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to – \n(a) \nwhen was the request for police intervention received, indicating what followed; \n(b)  the reported number of persons present and allegedly contravening public order \nand noise pollution legislation, indicating the number thereof arrested and \nprovisionally charged;  \n(c)  why reinforcement was not mobilised, and  \n(d)  the measures being contemplated to enhance law enforcement and maintenance of \npublic order on public beaches.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nTRIOLET -  MR. R. D. B. & SPOUSE AGGRESSION – ARRESTS EFFECTED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/14",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 14,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/14) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the aggression \ncommitted against one Mr. R. D. B. of Residence Mère Theresa, in Triolet, reported on or \nabout 08 March 2026 at the Triolet Police Station, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Commissioner of Police, information as to the number of arrests effected in \nconnection therewith, if any, indicating the charges preferred against them, if any.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that, on 08 March 2026, Mr \nR.D.B, aged 42 and residing at Triolet, reported a case of assault against him and his spouse \nat the Triolet Police Station. On the same day, Police Officers of the Triolet Police Station, \ntogether with Mr R.D.B, examined the site of the incident and looked for the alleged \nassaulters, but the latter were not found. \nAccording to the statement of Mr R.D.B., on 04 March 2026, he was in front of his \nresidence when a private car, driven by a lady, drove on the left foot of his neighbour’s \ndaughter, aged 06. The driver did not stop. After the incident, he went to the residence of the \nlady driver and reproached her. He then returned to his residence. Mr R.D.B. further alleged \nthat, whilst he was about to convey the child to the hospital, the brother of the lady driver \narrived, used filthy languages to his address and tried to hit him but he managed to escape. \nSubsequently, he brought the child to hospital. On his return, his neighbours informed him \nthat some people were looking for him. \nAccording to Mr R.D.B., on 08 March 2026, when he was at his entrance gate, he was \nassaulted by the brother of the lady driver and other persons. He attended hospital for \ntreatment. \n As at date, police enquiry is underway. \n \nENTITIES – FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE GRANT – QUANTUM RECOUPED – \nOUTSTANDING BALANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/15",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 15,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/15) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to financial \nassistance granted to entities, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius \nInvestment Corporation Ltd., information as to the quantum thereof recouped as at to date \nindicating the outstanding balance thereof.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/8) \nRODRIGUES – AIR MAURITIUS FLIGHTS – HARD LANDING INCIDENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/16",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 16,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/16) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to flights operated by \nAir Mauritius Ltd., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number \nof recent hard landing thereof at the Plaine Corail Airport, indicating in each case, the – \n(a) \nreasons therefor, indicating if the crew members effecting the landing were \nsufficiently experienced, and \n(b) \nmeasures taken to reassure the passengers.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by both the Department of Civil Aviation and Air Mauritius Ltd \nthat there have been two recent hard landing incidents at Plaine Corail Airport. The first \nincident occurred on 31 July 2025 on Flight MK 130, involving an ATR72-500 and the \nsecond incident occurred on 07 February 2026, involving an ATR72-600 aircraft.   \nIt is worth highlighting that Plaine Corail Airport is classified as a Category C airport \ndue to its runway and meteorological conditions prevailing thereat and therefore, requires \nspecial pilot training. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that following the first hard \nlanding incident, the Department of Civil Aviation initiated an investigation on 06 August \n2025 in accordance with the International Civil Aviation Organisation aircraft investigation \nrequirements. The preliminary investigation revealed that the flight was subject to crosswind \nturbulences. \nThe main contributing factor was the sudden crosswind associated with a windshear, \nhence causing the aircraft to land abruptly on the runway, resulting in the first bounce and \nthereafter, a second bounce which resulted into the hard landing. \nIn regard to the second hard landing which occurred on 07 February 2026, I am \ninformed that, while approaching the runway, the aircraft encountered a northerly crosswind \nassociated with a light tailwind which destabilized the aircraft making it to lose consequent \namount of energy and fall to the ground thus, resulting into a hard landing. \nConcerning the first incident which occurred on 31 July 2025, I am informed that the \ncockpit crew comprised a Captain with 9,124 Total Flight Hours, with over 5,000 Flight \nHours on the ATR-type aircraft and a Copilot with 784 Total Flight Hours, out of which 600 \nFlight Hours are on the ATR-type aircraft. It is to be noted that both the Pilot and the Copilot \nwere qualified and had the required experience to fly the ATR. \nAccording to the Department of Civil Aviation, the aircraft was being flown by the \nCaptain assisted by the Copilot and the Copilot made the appropriate call for go-around in \naccordance with the standard operating procedures during the occurrence. However, the \nCaptain stated that he had control of the aircraft and decided to land and this contributed in \nthe hard landing. Consequently, the licence of the Captain was suspended by the Department \nof Civil Aviation. \nRegarding the second hard landing which occurred on 07 February 2026, I am informed \nthat the Captain was a fully qualified instructor with 14,500 Total Flight Hours, out of which, \n5,400 Flight Hours were on ATR-type aircraft. The Copilot had 13,300 Total Flight Hours, \nout of which 4,750 Flight Hours were on the ATR-type aircraft. Moreover, a preliminary \ninvestigation by the Department of Civil Aviation, revealed that the Pilot and the Copilot \nwere sufficiently experienced to manage the flight in unfavourable weather conditions as per \nthe standard operating procedures of the Department of the Civil Aviation. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed that standard company procedures, \napproved by the Department of Civil Aviation, were followed to ensure passenger safety.  \nAfter both landings, the aircraft taxied to their designated parking areas uneventfully and \npassengers were disembarked normally. As part of the procedure, the Captains reported the \nparameters of the landings, which were conveyed as hard landings as the landing limits had \nbeen exceeded. \nI am further informed that as remedial actions and to ensure the safety of passengers as \nwell as its crew, both aircraft were thoroughly inspected and repaired before returning to \nservice. Furthermore, crew training has been intensified and Air Mauritius Ltd increased the \npercentage of simulations for Plaine Corail Airport. In addition, based on the \nrecommendations made by the Department of Civil Aviation, Air Mauritius was requested to \namend its operation manually to ensure that unfavourable meteorological conditions in \nrelation to crosswind, tailwind and gusts are properly highlighted with a view to minimising \nthe risk of similar incidents from reoccurring in the future. \nI seize this opportunity to reassure the House and the passengers travelling to and from \nRodrigues that Air Mauritius Ltd has classified the airport of Rodrigues as a Category C \naerodrome. This means that particular attention is given to the training provided to pilots \noperating the ATR72 aircraft to Rodrigues. Several restrictions and requirements are in place \nincluding, special simulator training leading to a specific rating for daytime landing in \nRodrigues and additional simulator training leading to a specific rating for night landings in \nRodrigues. Furthermore, only Captains are permitted to perform landings in Rodrigues at \nnight. These measures are implemented to ensure the highest level of safety for operations to \nand from Rodrigues. No pilot is allowed to fly to Rodrigues unless he has completed all \nrequired training and checks. \nThe construction of the new runway at Plaine Corail airport will significantly enhance \nair connectivity of Rodrigues Island by enabling the airport to accommodate larger aircraft. \nConsequently, Air Mauritius will be able to operate narrow body aircraft to Rodrigues, with a \nseating capacity of around 200 passengers, thereby increasing passenger capacity and \nimproving its services to Rodrigues. \n \nCHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO –MALDIVES POSITION & DIPLOMATIC \nIMPLICATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/17",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 17,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/17) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Chagos \nArchipelago, he will state whether his office has been formally notified of the statement made \nby the President of the Republic of Maldives on 2 February 2026, indicating – \n(a)  the diplomatic and legal measures being envisaged/taken by Government \nfollowing same, and  \n(b)   how same may impact the – \n (i)  Chagos Archipelago treaty signed in May 2025 between the United \nKingdom and the Republic of Mauritius, and  \n(ii)  issue on maritime boundary contained in the 2023 ruling of the \nInternational Tribunal for the Law of the Sea.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIAN ECONOMY – MOODY’S DOWNGRADE – COMPREHENSIVE \nIMPACT ASSESSMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/18",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 18,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/18) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Mauritian \neconomy, he will state whether a comprehensive impact assessment thereon has been carried \nout should Moody’s downgrade the sovereign credit rating thereof to junk status for some \nreasons or the other and, if so, give details thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nDRUG TRAFFICKING & DEALERS – MONEY LAUNDERING – VEHICLE \nSEIZURES & ARRESTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/19",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 19,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/19) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port-Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the laundering of money suspected of being proceeds of drug trafficking, since \nNovember 2024 to date, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Financial \nCrimes Commission and the Commissioner of Police, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of suspected drug dealers arrested in relation thereto, and  \n(b) \nlist of vehicles including cars, motorbikes and quads and pleasure craft seized in \nconnection therein, indicating the total estimated value thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPORT LOUIS – ABANDONED VEHICLES ON PUBLIC ROADS – PARKING SPACE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/20",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 20,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/20) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to abandoned vehicles, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the number thereof currently lying on public roads \nin Port Louis and the extent of parking space available at the Fort George area therefor, \nindicating whether – \n(a) \nthe prompt removal/disposal of the said vehicles is being envisaged and, if so, \nhow and when, and \n(b) \nconsideration will be given for the provision of additional parking spaces \ntherefor.",
      "answer": "Reply: As regards part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of \nPolice that as at 14 March 2026, a total of nine vehicles had been identified as abandoned on \npublic roads in Port Louis. The owners had been notified and given 48 hours to remove their \nrespective vehicles failing which, the vehicles will be towed to Fort George. \nI have been informed that on 16 March 2026, seven out of the nine vehicles were \nremoved and towed to Fort George. The Police is making arrangements to remove the \nremaining two vehicles. \nThe Fort George area, encompassing approximately 18 acres, has been provided for use \nby the Police as a storage facility for abandoned vehicles removed from public roads, seized \nvehicles, and other Police vehicles not currently in use. The site currently has a capacity of \n455 parking spaces, of which, 255 are presently occupied, leaving 200 spaces available. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the hon. Member that measures are \nbeing implemented to increase the parking capacity at Fort George by approximately 400 \nadditional spaces in order to accommodate vehicles removed from public roads, seized \nvehicles and other Police vehicles not currently in use. \nCHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO – ONGOING NEGOTIATIONS – FINANCIAL, \nLEGAL & SECURITY IMPLICATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/21",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 21,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/21) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Chagos Archipelago, he will state the current state of the negotiations with the \nUnited Kingdom, including the financial, legal and security implications for Mauritius.",
      "answer": "(Vide reply to PQ B/1) \nRODRIGUES – EARTHQUAKES – WARNING PROTOCOL",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/22",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 22,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/22) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the frequent \noccurrence of earthquakes in or near Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Mauritius Meteorological Services, information as to whether – \n(a) \nany warning protocol and any sensitization programme on preventive measures \nhave been established for the benefit of the public and, if so, give details \nthereof, and \n(b) \nRodrigues is equipped with a seismometer and, if so, who monitors the data on \nseismic activity thus received and, if not, how the said data is received and \nmonitored.",
      "answer": "Reply: Mauritius and its outer islands are not entirely free from earthquake risks and \ntremors, although the region is generally considered to have a relatively low level of seismic \nactivity. \nThe Mauritius Meteorological Services (MMS) is the official authority responsible for \nthe close monitoring on a 24/7 basis of earthquakes and the progress of tsunami waves caused \nby seismic activity.  The MMS monitors seismic activities around the world through the \nUnited States Geological Survey (USGS) and the California Integrated Seismic Network \n(CISN). The MMS is also responsible for the Tsunami Warning and issue appropriate \nbulletins and Earthquake Information Notes. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, whenever an earthquake of magnitude greater \nthan 5.0 occurs in the Indian Ocean, an alarm is triggered on the USGS System and the \nNational Warning Centre of the MMS is activated. Information Bulletins are then issued in \nline with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) of the MMS on earthquakes. The \nbulletins issued are as follows – \n(i) \nif the magnitude is greater than 5.0 and the epicentre is within 400 km of the \nislands of Mauritius, Rodrigues, Agalega or St Brandon, the MMS issue \nInformation Bulletin to all stakeholders; \n(ii) \nif the magnitude is less than 5.0 and epicentre within 400 km of the islands of \nMauritius, Rodrigues, Agalega or St Brandon, the MMS issue Information \nBulletin to key stakeholders only (the hon. Prime Minister, the Secretary to \nCabinet and Head of the Civil Service, the Commissioner of Police and the \nOfficer in Charge of National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Centre \n(NDRRMC), and \n(iii) \nif the magnitude less than 5.0 and epicentre greater than 400 km, the MMS do \nnot issue any information bulletin. \nSince year 2009, Mauritius has participated in all Indian Ocean Wide-Tsunami Wave \nExercise (IOWAVE) simulation exercises. The last real-time simulation exercise was carried \nout on 15 October 2025 across Mauritius, Rodrigues and Agalega. With regard to Rodrigues, \nthe exercise was undertaken at three coastal locations, namely Anse aux Anglais, Caverne \nProvert and Jean Tac, Terre Rouge. The inhabitants in the vicinity of the coastal areas were \nsensitised by the Police du Tourisme, Police de l’Environnement, Fisheries Protection Service \nand the National Coast Guard. The coastal communities were also familiarised on the \ndedicated siren and about 56 sea goers were sensitised. \nFollowing the earthquake of magnitude 5.4 which occurred on Tuesday 06 January \n2026 at around 14.10 hours, at about 77 km northeast of Rodrigues, at my request, a team \nfrom the MMS was deployed to Rodrigues to carry out an assessment. The team also carried \nsensitisation campaigns in Rodrigues from 07 to 09 January 2026 with the main objective of \nraising awareness on the earthquakes and other natural hazards, and the Early Warning \nSystem. \nThe MMS had several working sessions with the Members of the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly, representatives of public as well as private sectors, and heads of schools. Live \ninterventions were made on radio and broadcasted on TV. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed by the MMS that a seismometer is \noperational in Rodrigues since year 2012. It was installed at Reserve Francois Leguat by the \nInstitut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPGP). All data are transmitted in real time to the \nIPGP Data Centre, around the world and to global centres such as the USGS, CISN and \nTsunami Warning Centres. \nAfter the mission in Rodrigues in January 2026, the team from the MMS has made the \nfollowing recommendations – \n(i) \nConduct of regular and continuous sensitisation on weather/natural hazards; \n(ii) \nSet up of a local seismic and tide-gauge network for Mauritius, Rodrigues and \nAgalega for early detection of an earthquake and timely dissemination of \ninformation. Negotiations for assistance from UNESCO and IOC are ongoing; \n(iii) \nImplementation of an effective communication system with all stakeholders, \nand \n(iv) \nDevelopment of a well-defined protocol and SOPs to improve disaster \npreparedness. \n \nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD – MR. S. M., DEPUTY CEO – \nCONTRACT RENEWAL & CONDITIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/23",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 23,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/23) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil)  asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mr. S. M., Deputy \nChief Executive Officer of the Economic Development Board, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to his date and terms and conditions of appointment, indicating \nthe circumstances under which his contract was renewed and the terms and conditions of his \nnew contract.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nMIDDLE EAST CONFLICT – IMPACT ON MAURITIAN ECONOMY – \nENERGY CRISIS – PREPAREDNESS PLAN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/24",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 24,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/24) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Mauritian \neconomy, he will state Government assessment of the implications and impacts thereon of the \ncurrent conflict in the Middle East, including, on the supply chain, inflation rate, oil, gas and \nenergy prices and any other disruptions, indicating the preparedness of Government in the \nface thereof, including, whether negotiations are being held to mitigate the energy crisis.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PNQ) \nIRAN WAR – ECONOMIC IMPACT & FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES – \nIMPORTS ASSESSMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-07-april-2026"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/25",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 25,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/25) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre D'or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nimpact and financial consequences on the national economy due to the ongoing war in Iran, \nhe will state if an assessment thereof has been made in terms of imports, including energy \nand food products, indicating whether mitigation measures are being envisaged/taken to \noffset the inevitable rise in the rate of inflation.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PNQ) \nRODRIGUES – HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & WASTE – PROTOCOL & \nPROCEDURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/26",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 26,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade",
      "question": "(No. B/26) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nForeign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade whether, in regard to the \nongoing conflict in the Middle East, he will state the – \n(a)  \ndiplomatic measures being taken by Government to ensure the safety of \nMauritian citizens and of the Mauritian diaspora thereat, and  \n(b)  \nefforts being made by Government towards de-escalation or cessation of \nhostilities and for the promotion of dialogue and diplomacy for peace and \ndemocracy thereat.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PNQ) \nMr A. Duval: It would be mine, Madam Speaker. B/27. \nMAURITIUS TOURISM AUTHORITY – MR J.A, PART-TIME CHAIRMAN –\nDISMISSAL, REINTERGRATION & SUSPENSION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/27",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 27,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. B/27) Mr A. Duval ( Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Tourism whether, in regard to Mr. J.A., he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the Mauritius Tourism Authority (MTA), information as to the \nreasons/grounds of his dismissal and subsequent re-integration and suspension as chairperson \nof the MTA, indicating whether any enquiry has been initiated into his conduct during his \ntenure of office thereat and, if so, indicate the outcome thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr R. Duval: Madam Speaker, Mr J.A. was appointment as part-time Chairman of the \nTourism Authority Board on 08 January 2025 under Section 4(2) (a) of the Tourism \nAuthority Act. \nSince his appointment, Mr J.A. has been subject to various complaints, both in writing \nand verbal from the staff of the tourism authority. These complaints relate essentially to his \nexcessive behaviour, use of foul and derogatory language, lack of respect, giving them \ninstructions when he is not authorised to do as a part-time Chairperson, compelling them to \ndo things against their will, shouting at them and persecuting them. \nIt is worth noting, Madam Speaker, that as per section 14(2) of the Tourism Authority \nAct, all employees of the authority fall under the administrative control of the Director, and \nthe part-time Chairman. Mr J.A. therefore, had no authority to give employees any directives. \nThe House may also wish to note that Mr J.A. has been reported by the former Director \nof the Tourism Authority and even the current one who has been in office for less than one \nmonth. Both complained that they were not able to work properly in view of the attitude of \nthe part-time Chairperson.  \nIn short, Madam Speaker, Mr J.A. was acting beyond his power of part-time \nChairperson. He was behaving like a brute, exactly like the bitort which the hon. Deputy \nPrime Minister mentioned in his press conference. He even abused his position to have access \nto CCTV cameras and vehicle GPS tracking system on his laptop.  \nMadam Speaker, in November last, Mr J.A. picked a serious fight with the former \nDirector; a matter which he himself reported to the ministry. The ministry initiated an enquiry \nthereon. However, when called at the ministry for his version, Mr J.A. refused to come on \nground that he was travelling. The enquiry could therefore not be finalised.  \nFollowing the resignation of the former Director in early January this year, Mr J.A took \ntotal control of the Tourism Authority and I am informed that he carried out major reshuffle \nat the Tourism Authority without consulting the board.  \nOn 12 February 2026, one lady officer of the Tourism Authority reported the part-time \nChairperson, in a precautionary measure, to the Line Barracks police station, OB number \n1278/226. I wish to point out, Madam Speaker, that this is not the only complaint of \nmisbehaviour, harassment at the Tourism Authority reported to my Ministry and the labour \noffice. \nI wish to mention the case of another lady who reported having been verbally abused by \nthe part-time Chairperson using unacceptable language which I don’t want to quote. She \nreported the case to the labour office and her union. Mr J.A. was fully aware of all these \ncomplaints as his explanation has also been sought by the Ministry.  \nIn addition, Madam Speaker, Mr J.A. had forced his way to chair the Licensing \nCommittee which examines and grants licenses to pleasure crafts, tourism activities, guest \nhouses, restaurants and hotels. Although this is not in line with the code of good governance, \nhe held that key committee pratiquement en otage. Meetings were being scheduled as per his \nconvenience after long intervals despite the applications accumulating. Many members \npresent here, in the House, have called my Ministry to complain of the excessive delay in \ndetermination of applications.  \nSince the situation the Tourism Authority was deteriorating, I had no choice than to end \nthe appointment of the part-time Chairperson of the Tourism Authority in line with the \nsection 4(3) of the Tourism Authority Act and section 28(1)(c) of the Interpretation and \nGeneral Clauses Act. Same was communicated to him by way of a letter on 27 February \n2026.  \nHowever, I understand that following intense lobbying from his part, instruction was \nreceived at my Ministry on Thursday 05 March 2026 for his letter of termination to be \nrecalled. I wish to point out that I was out of the country at the time and came back only on \nSaturday 07 March 2026.  \nMadam Speaker, I later took cognizance of this matter, and it was further discussed at \nthe Cabinet meeting held on 06 March 2026. It was decided that Mr J.A. be suspended with \nimmediate effect, and that an enquiry be carried out to look into the various allegations of \nmalpractices made against him.  \nMy Ministry is in consultation with the Attorney General’s Office for the setting up of \nan enquiry. The House will agree that it will be not in order for me to delve into the matter \nfurther given an inquiry is being contemplated. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, may I? If you will allow me three supplementaries.  \nMadam Speaker: I will try. \nMr A. Duval: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Very brief ones. The first one, Madam \nSpeaker, being this non-executive director, according to law, does not have the protection as \nan employee, the question is: why was it decided to suspend him after having dismissed him, \nand to conduct an inquiry?  \nIn fact, as early as October 2025, there had been at least two previous complaints \nagainst this person for verbal abuse, but also for acting in abuse of his authority as a non-\nexecutive director; giving directive and orders to staff; having a day-to-day office; having a \nsecretary, and all sorts of other privileges which he was not entitled to.  \nMr R. Duval: Madame la présidente, je pense que j’étais très explicite dans ma \nréponse initiale.  \nNéanmoins, Madam Speaker, there are not only some complaints. There are several. As \nat date, there are several employees who had already lodged a complaint either at the \nMinistry of Labour, at the police, or at my Ministry. I confirm that he was abusing his \nauthority and even had access to CCTV footage. Yes, he did act like a bitor, Madam Speaker. \nAs a responsible Minister, I acted in the interests, I must say, of the employees and revoked \nMr J.A. as Chairperson. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker! \nMadam Speaker: Yes, you asked for two. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, is the hon. Minister aware that on the 5th, he was \nrecalled – and this is a very serious matter –; on Friday 06, this non-executive chairman calls \nat the office at seven, had his own key, and in his office, a shredder. \nMadam Speaker: Do not! You are always making statements! \nMr A. Duval: Is he aware? It is a question that he had… \nMadam Speaker: Is he aware of that? \nMr A. Duval: That he had his own key and a shredder and that on Friday 06, he was \ngiven unsupervised access to the Tourism Authority, and he has done God knows what, for I \ndo not know how long! On the eve, he had been revoked, and there was an inquiry that would \nbe instituted a few hours later. Is he aware that he had his key and access to a shredder in his \noffice and was left unsupervised on 06 March? \nMr R. Duval: Of course, Madam Speaker, I am aware! I was fully aware. Yes, I \nconfirm that Mr J.A. refused to hand over his keys and other Tourism Authority property.  \nNeedful is being done to recover the property of the Tourism Authority. But I must say \non the other side, Madam Speaker, that my Ministry in consultation with the Attorney \nGeneral’s Office in setting up an enquiry. The enquiry will be done.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, we have to wait. \nMr R. Duval: We will have to wait. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, wait for the enquiry. Yes! \nMs Savabaddy: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Minister inform the House \nwhy he was maintained at his position despite all those numerous accusations? Thank you. \nMr R. Duval: We knew about it, but he never came to the office when we called him. I \ntalked to him several times on the phone and he was always outside the country. He was not \neven listening to the Minister. So, for my part, I do not want to sub judice the matter, given \nthat an enquiry is being contemplated. Let us wait for the enquiry and then we see. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr A. Duval: One last question. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, there is a question there. It was asked before. \nMr Ramkalawon: Can I ask the hon. Minister if the day Mr J.A. came back to office, \nafter his reintegration, was he involved in an incident? If yes, what was the nature of that \nincident? Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: On the day that he came back.  \nMr R. Duval: Yes, indeed, Madam Speaker, I am informed that there was an incident \non Friday 06 March 2026. Mr J.A. came on the premises of the Tourism Authority and yelled \nat the director and other employees. The part-time Chairperson even aliterated some \nunpleasant words. The issue was on his insistence to his access to images of CCTV camera of \nthe organisation, which I have in my possession. And this is the key to everything! \nMadam Speaker: Which you are not giving us for the moment. \nAn hon. Member: Not yet, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Maybe you will give it to those who will enquire, I suppose. \nMr R. Duval: Exactly. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Mr A. Duval! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, given the influence of the super non-executive \nchairman he has wielded in the past, in view of the numerous complaints that had been made \nagainst him and the fact that no action had been taken prior, is he satisfied with how senior \nmembers of Government have come to whitewash those complaints in the news even before \nan investigation provides its findings, and even commenting on what he believed to be the \naccusations and its seriousness?  \nIs the hon. Minister satisfied given that these are employees falling under an authority, \nunder his responsibility, that due process has been followed in this matter? \nMr R. Duval: I already took decisions that had to be taken, Madame la présidente. But \nwhat I want to say is I cannot be judge and party even before having the findings of the \nenquiry. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nMr R. Duval: I cannot be. \nMadam Speaker: I think we have gone quite thoroughly in this issue. May I ask the \nnext question, please!  \nMV WAKASHIO SHIPWRECK – VICTIMS COMPENSATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/28",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 28,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/28) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the MV Wakashio shipwreck, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to where matters stand regarding the payment of compensation to all the \nvictims thereof, indicating the next step in case Government did not accept the compensation \nproposed by the International court.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, the House will recall the previous government was never \nin favour of making public the report of the Court of Investigation into the grounding of MV \nWakashio. The MSM-led regime was indifferent and insensitive to the appeal from the public \nand hon. Members of the Opposition. I place on record that this Government took a bold \ndecision, and on 02 October 2025, the report was made public. \nIndeed, a major milestone in our bid to making freedom of information a reality and \nupholding transparency in Government endeavours. Since the grounding of the MV Wakashio \non 25 July 2020 and to date, Madam Speaker, there has been a total of 6,309 claims \namounting to approximately Rs2.3 billion, which have been transmitted to Japan P&I Club, \nthe insurer of MV Wakashio for reimbursement.  \nHowever, as I had previously mentioned in my reply to PQ B/989 at the Sitting of 11 \nNovember 2025, whereby I tabled the total amount of compensation which is around Rs200 \nmillion that was paid to the victims over the period 2021-2022 by the insurer of MV \nWakashio. It was indeed a huge letdown as only Rs200 million out of the Rs2.3 billion was \npaid to the victims.  \nOn 2025 October 2021, the ship owner Okiyo Maritime Corporation entered a case \nbefore the Supreme Court applying for limitation fund to be set up limiting the value of \ncompensation to be paid to the tune of approximately Rs720 million.  \nI am also informed that since this case was lodged, the insurer had seized payment of \ncompensation to the victims. \nThe last payment of compensation made by the insurer was in April 2022. On 23 \nFebruary 2026, the Supreme Court delivered a judgement authorising Okiyo Maritime \nCorporation to set up a limitation fund for the payment of claims not related to oil pollution \ndamaged by way of bank guaranteed. \nI have been informed by the hon. Attorney General’s Office that Okiyo Maritime \nCorporation has now lodged an appeal against the judgement of the Supreme Court before the \nJudicial Committee of the Privy Council. The case will probably be heard before the Judicial \nCommittee of the Privy Council by the middle of next year. \nI am made to understand that my good friend, hon. Member, in his question, that I am \nsure that he was referring to the Supreme Court Judgement and not as an international court \nas there has been no compensation proposed by the international court regarding this case. \n  I am further informed by the Attorney General’s Office, Madam Speaker that \nfollowing the Supreme Court Judgement, the State of Mauritius will now enter a case against \nthe owner and related parties to seek damages for the oil pollution damage following the \ngrounding of the MV Wakashio and the ensuing oil spill. \nIt is in this very perspective but my Ministry, in consultation with the Attorney \nGeneral’s Office, is working on a mise en demeure against Okiyo Maritime Corporation for \noil pollution damage. \nThis Government believes in the principles of the rule of law and it is committed to \nensure that justice is done to the people of Mauritius especially those who have directly \nsuffered due to the impact of the shipwreck and oil spill. \nAs a responsible government, we will stand guided by the decision of the court but I \nwish to reiterate that Government will ensure that compensation due are paid to victims. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Seeburn: Yes, Madam Speaker, being given that a figure has been earmarked for \ncompensation, is the hon. Minister in a position to see whether there is a possibility to \nnegotiate for an interim payment in the meantime so as to reduce the amount of prejudice \nbeing caused to the victims of the MV Wakashio? \nDr. Boolell: My hon. Friend can rest assured that in regard to the legal issue, the matter \nis being dealt with by our friends from Attorney General’s Office. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, your next question has already been replied. Right? \nMIDDLE EAST TENSIONS – GLOBAL PETROLEUM MARKETS – IMPACTS & \nRISK MITIGATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/29",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 29,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/29) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the impact \nof rising geopolitical tensions in the Middle East on global petroleum markets, he will state, \nwhether an assessment of the potential repercussions thereof on the local market has been \ncarried out, indicating the measures being envisaged to ensure adequate supply of petroleum \nproducts, and whether consideration is being given to entering into supply arrangements at \nfixed or preferential prices with suppliers to mitigate the risks associated with further \nincreases in global petroleum prices.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PNQ) \nMadam Speaker: Now, we have the hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite \nRivière. \nKREOL MORISIEN – NCE & SC EXAMINATION – REGISTERED & \nRECRUITED TEACHERS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/30",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 30,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/30) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the Kreol Morisien, he \nwill state – \n(a) \nthe number of secondary schools currently offering same as a subject from Grade \n7 onwards, indicating the number of teachers thereof currently registered; \n(b) \nwhether there are institutions where students sat for the Grade 9 National \nCertificate of Education Examinations or the Cambridge School Certificate \nExamination without having a designated educator therefor, and \n(c) \nwhether the Ministry has recently recruited educators to teach same in secondary \nschools and, if not, whether it intends to do so.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed that currently 75 secondary schools are offering Kreol Morisien (KM) as a subject \nfrom Grade 7 onwards. \nOut of the 75 colleges, 26 are State Secondary Schools while 49 Private Secondary \nSchools. Presently, 28 KM educators are posted in in the State Secondary Schools, while 101 \nKM educators operating in the Private Secondary Schools are registered with the Private \nSecondary Education Authority. \nMadam Speaker, as regard part (b) of the question, I am informed that KM educators \nare posted in every state college wherein KM is offered as a subject. \nPrivate Secondary Schools offering KM also provide KM educators to students opting \nfor the subject.  \nNotwithstanding the above, I am informed that two students from one SSS, a college \nnot offering KM as a subject sat for KM examinations for National Certificate of Education \nexaminations. There is no report of any case whereby students have sat for School Certificate \nExaminations in KM without having a designated educator thereof.  \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (c) of the question, I am informed that an \nexercise was recently carried out for the recruitment of supply teachers including KM supply \nteachers during this financial year for State Colleges. \nSeven KM educators have also been recently recruited in Private Secondary Schools. \nIn view of the upcoming budgetary exercise, my Ministry will submit its proposal to the \nMinistry of Finance for the recruitment of secondary educators which will include additional \nKM educators in view of the increasing number of students opting for the subject. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. L’honorable ministre peut-il dire à la \nChambre si son ministère dispose d’un département dédié au Créole mauricien afin de traiter \ntoutes les questions relatives à l’enseignement et au développement du Créole mauricien dans \nles écoles primaires et secondaires et si ce n’est pas le cas, peut-il nous donner les raisons ? \nDr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, for the time being there is no dedicated \ndepartment handling this and because it is rather new. This Government in 2025, introduced \nKM as a subsidiary subject in HSC and as from this year it is a main subject in HSC. \nDefinitely, if need arises this department will be created as suggested by the hon. \nMember. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente, rapidement. Étant donné qu’aucune démarche, \ncomme vient de le confirmer l’honorable Ministre lui-même, de ce type n’a été entreprise \ndepuis l’introduction du Créole mauricien en 2012. Il faut bien le préciser, l’honorable \nministre, malgré qu’il l’a dit, je lui demande à nouveau, est-ce qu’il peut donner l’assurance à \nla Chambre que son ministère accordera l’attention nécessaire au Créole mauricien, la langue \ndes mauriciens, en matant en place un département spécifiquement dédié à cette matière ? \nDr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, again I will answer the hon. Member, if need \narises within Ministry in order to create such a department, it would be done by affirmative. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Hon. Beechook! \nMr Beechook: Yes, Madame la présidente. Will the hon. Minister confirm whether \nstudents are made to choose either KM or Oriental languages, currently? \nDr. Gungapersad: It is an optional subject, all right! It is an optional subject; they are \nproposed a series of subjects and out of these subjects, they have to choose. Yes, it is an \noptional subject. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Beechook: Therefore, will the hon. Minister consider the possibility to make it \npossible for Mauritian students to do both KM and Oriental languages, so that we do not have \nto choose one language either KM or an Oriental language? \nDr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, in practical terms, this has to be studied whether, \nas suggested by the hon. Member, this can be proposed or not because it has technicalities \ninvolved in it because we are talking about timetabling, we are talking about teacher \navailability. It has a lot of implications. So, this has to be studied before a direct answer can \nbe provided to the hon. Member. \nMadam Speaker: Very interesting, very interesting! Next question please! Yes, hon. \nRookny! \nGLOBAL BUSINESS COMPANIES – APPLICATIONS FOR LICENCES – DELAYS \n& PROGRESS REPORT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/31",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 31,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/31) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to measures \nundertaken to address the issue of delays in the processing of applications for the issue of \nlicences for Global Business Companies, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \nthe Financial Services Commission, information as to the progress achieved in relation \nthereto as at to date.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ms Jeetun: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Member for the question. Madam \nSpeaker, in my reply to the PQ B/1146 in December 2025, I informed the House that there \nwere 120 outstanding applications in respect of Global Business Companies as at 15 \nNovember 2025 with the oldest application dating back to April 2023, that is, some two and \na half years pending. \nI am informed that out of these cases, 76 applications had been completed, 10 were \nwithdrawn and one was returned to the applicant as at 28 February 2026 while 33 \napplications were still pending with oldest application dating back to 25 November 2024. \nMadam Speaker, since 15 November 2025 till 28 February 2026, I am informed that \nthe Commission has received 713 new GBC applications and as at the end of February, \nthere were still 102 pending applications which include the 33 applications mentioned \nearlier. \nMadam Speaker, I am tabling a breakdown of the status of the applications for the \nGlobal Business companies received by the Commission as at 28 February 2026. \nMadam Speaker, the House was also informed that due consideration would be given to \nthe setting up of a complaints desk at the Commission and to this regard, I am informed that \nan online complaints platform, namely the FSC Mauritius Online Complaints Portal which \nalso caters for complaints regarding a regulated entity holding a GBC licence from the FSC, \nwas launched yesterday. \nMadam Speaker, I would also like to add that the Financial Services Consultative \nCouncil which meets regularly under my chairmanship since October 2025, monitors the \nimplementation of the recommendations of the Financial Services Strategy Report, rethinking \nthe future of the Financial Services Sector 2025-2030. The FSCC has a dedicated sub-\ncommittee to look into the ease of doing business of the financial services sector. This sub-\ncommittee meets under the chairmanship of the Chief Executive of the FSC and is closely \nmonitoring the time taken to process applications at the FSC and look into ways and means to \nactivate matters, so that applications are processed in a reasonable time period. \nMadam Speaker, I would further like to highlight that as part of the Budget 2025-2026, \nmy Ministry has set very clear performance indicators for the Commission through a \nperformance agreement. These performance indicators are as follows – \n(i) \na maximum turnaround time for application of 10 days; \n(ii) \nthat 85% of applications shall be processed within a maximum of 15 calendar \ndays, and \n(iii) that applications exceeding 30 calendar days shall represent only 5% of total \napplications. \nAnd in order to meet these objectives, Madam Speaker, I am informed that the \nCommission has initiated several actions to reduce the turnaround time for the processing of \nlicences, including GBCs – \n(a) \nThe Known to Commission system which was gazetted on 17 December 2025 \nand is effective as from 5 January 2026. This system enables the FSC to \nstreamline the process for those companies which already hold a licence from the \nFSC. \n(b) \nThe application for Change in Directorship and Shareholders of a Licensee of the \nFSC will become fully digital by the end of March 2026. \n(c) \nThe Investment Dealer application has been restructured with improved templates \nwhich are more user-friendly. \nFurthermore, I am also informed that the Commission is integrating the use of Artificial \nIntelligence Agents across all applications to streamline the process for all licencing \ncategories.  \nThese new initiatives, Madam Speaker, are meant to ensure quicker turnaround time for \nprocessing of licences. And in conclusion, let me add that the improvements have been noted \nin processing time, targets have not yet been met but I am informed that the Commission is \ncontinuing to work on improving the ease of doing business. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Minister. Yes, Mr Rookny? \nMr Rookny: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Could the Minister please advise if there is \nany mechanism that exists to collect feedback from management companies and other \nlicensees with regard to their experience in delays and time taken for considering their \napplications? \nDr. Ms Jeetun: Madam Speaker, I have been urging the CEO of FSC and also through \nthe FSCC to make sure that there is a feedback loop with GBC companies and management \ncompanies in general, to make sure that the voice of the industry is heard with regard to those \ncomplaints. The complaints portal is one of them but I have also asked them to make sure that \nthey are continuously listening to the voice of the industry. In fact, they have set up a forum \ncalled ‘Industry Meet’, which is meeting regularly where all the stakeholders meet with CEO \nand the management of FSC to listen to the industry. \nMadam Speaker: Alright, hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes! \nCLUB MED ALBION – PUBLIC SERVICE VEHICLE (TAXI) LICENSE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/32",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 32,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/32) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to Club Med Albion, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information as to whether \nPublic Service Vehicle (Taxi) License will be issued for operation thereat and, if so, when \nand, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, Club Méditerranée, also known as Club Med, \nis a five-star rated hotel located at Albion and comprises 295 rooms and 40 villas. The hotel \noperates at an average occupancy rate of around 100% during peak seasons and \napproximately 50% off-peak periods. I am informed by the National Land Transport \nAuthority that presently, no taxi is licensed to operate from the hotel. However, 24 taxis from \nthe surrounding localities have been operating from the hotel premises since 01 July 2007 to \ncater for the transport needs of guests. \nNow, Madam Speaker, I am also informed by the NLTA that on 26 September 2007, the \nthen National Transport Authority (NTA) – it was then called NTA – decided to grant 20 taxi \nlicences on transfer to operate from Club Méditerranée Albion and the communiqué was \nissued on 06 October 2007 to invite applications. However, licencing exercise was not \nbrought to conclusion due to representations from the General Taxi Owners Union and a case \nlodged at the Supreme Court by six taxi owners. \nMadam Speaker, following a survey carried out in year 2022 and based on the policy \ncriterion of one taxi for every ten rooms, 33 taxis may be licenced to operate from the hotel. \nIt is my understanding that on 07 April 2023, new applications were invited through the press \nto grant taxi licences to operate from the hotel and 55 applications were received. However, \nthis exercise was not concluded in view of the serious flaws identified in the exercise. After \nthe general election of 2024, the new management of the NLTA promptly cancelled the \nexercise. \nMadam Speaker, the NLTA has advised by the end of April 2026 – in one and a half \nmonths’ time or so – applications will be invited on transfer from holders of taxi licences \nwithin a radius of 6 kilometres to provide taxi services at Club Med, Albion. Taxi operators \nwho have been providing services at the hotel during the last three years will also be eligible \nto apply. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, of course. \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Je remercie le ministre pour sa \nréponse. Can the Minister inform the House of the expected timeframe for the allocation of \nthese taxi licenses? Thank you. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Well, by the end of April 2026 like I mentioned, the Expression \nof Interest will be floated. Now, I hope there is no macadam, because sometimes if people \nprotest again it, it can be complicated like the case was in 2007. So, I think within this year it \nshould be resolved. \nMs Anquetil: Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Oui, M. Beechook ? \nMr Beechook: Oui, Madame. My question is not directly related to Club Med but to \nhotels and public service licenses. Will the hon. Minister request the NLTA to please enquire \ninto those hotels which are no more requesting taxi licenses and instead, are outsourcing the \nbusiness of transport to contractors, which to my knowledge, is illegal? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Member for this question. I \nam aware of such practice and mind you, my officers have been going down for crackdown \noperation and some well-known hotels, des noms ronflants have been taken to task. \nDr. Aumeer: Give us the names of the noms ronflants please! \nMadam Speaker: Ils ne sont pas des gentils organisateurs ! Okay, Ms Anquetil, you \nare okay? Okay, Mr Beechook, yes? \nSALAZIE, PONT BON DIEU & LA NICOLIERE – TELECOMMUNICATION \nEQUIPMENT – INSTALLATION MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/33",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 33,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/33) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in regard to \ninternet connection, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the mobile network \noperators in Mauritius, information as to whether measures have been taken for the \ninstallation of telecommunication equipment to ensure coverage in Salazie, Pont Bon Dieu, \nand La Nicolière.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: I thank the hon. Member for this question, Madam Speaker. \nThe House will recall that on 28 February 2025, I made a statement regarding the \nmobile network problem at Pont Bon Dieu along Salazie route.  \nI informed on three points – \n(i) \nthat Mauritius Telecom had identified three locations for new mobile sites, \nnamely Crimson Hall near Salazie Farm, and near Eau Bouillie Bus Terminal; \n(ii) \nthat Mauritius Telecom was in consultation with the owner of Crimson Hall and \na feasibility study is underway. The works at this site were expected to be \ncompleted by end of May 2025, and \n(iii) \nthat Mauritius Telecom was looking for a plot of land for the setting up of a new \ntower at the sites near Salazie Farm and Eau Bouillie. Subject to the obtention \nof an appropriate plot of land and a Building and Land Use Permit, the new \ntowers would be installed by December 2025 and May 2026, respectively. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that the antenna support to be installed at Crimson Hall \nis already operational since October 2025. With regard to the sites identified at Salazie Farm \nand Eau Bouillie Bus Terminal, I am further informed that Mauritius Telecom is still liaising \nwith the Ministry of Agro-Industry for release of the land. This is in process.  \nAs for Emtel Ltd, it has indicated that once Mauritius Telecom secures a site and \nbecomes operational, it would make a request for co-location at that site.  \nThe third operator, MTML (Mahanagar Telephone Mauritius Limited) informed that \ntests were conducted at the Salazie-Pont Bon Dieu region, but anticipated coverage \nimprovement was not achieved primarily due to dense vegetation. Further testing is being \ncarried, and if road coverage target would still not be achieved, the option of co-locating will \nalso be considered by this operator. Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \nMr Seeburn: Madam Speaker, being given that it is also a matter of concern for the \npeople of the eastern region of the country having the same issue, will the hon. Minister be \nable to confirm as to whether the same facilities have been identified in those areas as well? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister! \nDr. Ramtohul: This is a problem that is persistent in several regions of the country. I \ncan also name the south-east coast where at one point in time, there is no connection at all. \nNow, the ICTA has taken note of this issue. This is why the ICTA is releasing, in a few \nweeks’ time, an app called nPerf, which will be used to officially send out, by members of the \npublic, information on the network level. This will be taken by the authority to the operators \nfor them to ensure that they provide adequate coverage. \nMadam Speaker: Great! Okay, hon. Beechook! \nMr Beechook: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Minister for the antenna at Crimson \nHall. However, as a matter of policy, will the hon. Minister consider the possibility of urging \nthose telecom providers to provide service because there are too many dead zones? Many of \nthem, like Mare aux Vacoas, Mare Longue, Grand Bassin, Gorges, are regions which are high \ntourists’ regions. Unfortunately, it is a shame for Mauritius that there is no network coverage \ndone by companies who earn millions of profits in a service which, to my standards, is to be \nconsidered as an essential service. \nMadam Speaker: Nowadays! Yes! \nDr. Ramtohul: Thank you, hon. Beechook. There is an economic reality that the \ncompanies are also facing. However, there is a minimum coverage that should be provided \nfor tourists, I agree, but also for Mauritians as well. There are some areas where, should a car \nbreakdown and the driver be alone at night, it could cause danger to their life.  \nTherefore, the ICTA has the responsibility to ensure with the operators that there is a \nminimum coverage. I will convey that message to the Board of the ICTA. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Juman, your question has been replied already. So, we have \nfinished with that.  \nGAS OIL, MOGAS, JET FUEL & LPG – STOCK LEVELS, SUPPLY DISRUPTIONS \n& PREVENTIVE MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/34",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 34,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/34) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port Louis Maritime & Port Louis \nEast) asked the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to Gas \nOil, Mogas, Jet Fuel and Liquefied Petroleum Gas, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the State Trading Corporation, information as to – \n(a) \nthe current national stock levels thereof in Mauritius, indicating the respective \nquantities thereof expected to arrive in the next consignments and expected \narrival dates;  \n(b) \nwhether an assessment of potential supply disruptions has been carried out, and  \n(c) \nmeasures being envisaged to ensure no shortage thereof locally in case of \nprolonged disruption of the shipping routes.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PNQ) \nMadam Speaker: Now, I call hon. Second Member for Savanne and Black River! \nLE MORNE-CASE NOYALE MAIN ROAD – ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE \nFACILITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/35",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 35,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/35) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the main road from Le Morne to Case \nNoyale, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Traffic Management and Road \nSafety Unit, information as to whether – \n(a) \nconsideration will be given for – \n(i) \nthe provision of cat’s eyes along same, and  \n(ii) \na complete evaluation of the lighting and for the provision of markings \nalong same and other roads thereat and in the vicinity thereof, and  \n(b) \nit is in presence of requests from local inhabitants for the installation of speed \nbreakers thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I informed by the Traffic Management and \nRoad Safety Unit of my Ministry that the main from Le Morne to Case Noyale goes through \nstretches of inhabited areas, like the villages of Case Noyale, La Gaulette, Coteau Raffin and \nLe Morne Village, and several long stretches of uninhabited areas.  \nIn the inhabited areas, facilities such as street lighting, pedestrian crossings, footpaths \nand bus stops are provided. However, along the uninhabited stretches, which mainly consist \nof forested areas, such facilities are limited because of resources. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) (i) of the question, I am informed that cat’s \neyes are available in areas where there are limited or no street lights. In sections of the road \nthat are properly lit, cat’s eyes are not installed. Nevertheless, consideration will be given to \nthe installation of additional cat’s eyes, where required, so as to improve the conspicuity of \nthe road, particularly at night. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) (ii) of the question, street lights fall under the \nresponsibility of the highway authority, that is, the Road Development Authority for \nclassified roads and the local authorities for unclassified roads. It has been observed that \nstreet lights are available along the inhabited areas of the roads. However, in these areas, \nsolar street lights have been installed only at localised stretches at Le Morne junction. Road \nmarkings are present along the entire stretch of the road.  \nHowever, at several locations, the road markings have faded and will need to be \nrepainted. The maintenance of road markings along Black River-Savanne Coastal Road B9 \nfalls under the responsibility of the Road Development Authority, that is, under my \ncolleague, hon. Ajay Gunness. \nMadam Speaker, in reply to part (b) of the question, I am informed that requests have \nbeen received from residents regarding the provision of road humps in the villages of Coteau \nRaffin and Case Noyale, and actions have already been taken in this regard.  \nLastly, at Coteau Raffin, a raised pedestrian crossing has been implemented near the \nCashmere Polo Club. In the village of Case Noyale, a road hump already exists along the \nBlack River-Savanne Coastal Road B9, near the church. Additionally, with a view to deter \nspeeding and enhance road safety in the region, two raised pedestrian crossings have recently \nbeen placed along the Chamarel-Case Noyale Road B104. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Now, we have the hon. Third Member for Port Louis South and Port \nLouis Central! \nUMRAH PILGRIMAGE – LICENSED & REGISTERED OPERATORS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/36",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 36,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/36) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the Umrah \nPilgrimage, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Islamic Cultural Centre, the \nlist of the duly licensed and registered operators therewith therefor.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I shall answer this question in my \ncapacity as Minister responsible for Hajj. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nMr Mohamed: So, as it stands, the Islamic Cultural Centre does not issue licences or \nkeep a register of operators for Umrah Pilgrimage. However, there have been several \nmeetings that have been organised ever since last year, which is an inter-ministerial meeting, \nand it has for objective of revamping the law that governs the ICC as well as two other pieces \nof legislation which would concern the Waqf and the Muslim Family Council. En passant, I \ncan mention it. But there is a whole revamp of the statute pertaining to the Islamic Cultural \nCentre. This is one of the issues that will be taken on board amongst other issues. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Yes, hon. Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister whether is it \nnot high time, considering the number of organisers who organise religious pilgrimage across \nthe country – amongst, we have Umrah – and who have been taking people abroad, who have \nno regulations and are not answerable to any authority. I, myself, was recently along with a \ngroup of 200 Mauritians stranded abroad. We were taken on a “ride”! They were not \nanswerable to all the consequences of the war, the delayed travelling and flights cancellation. \nIs it not high time to consider the Tourism Authority? Are they taking people on a ‘touristic’ \n– if I can put it like that – or for pilgrimage/religious? At the end of the day, these people \nhave to be answerable to the people that have placed confidence in them. \nMadam Speaker: So, what was your question? \nDr. Aumeer: My question is: whether it is not high time to get the Tourism Authority \ninvolved as well to register these people? \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nMr Mohamed: I have taken note of the observations made by the hon. Member, \nMadam Speaker. It is true that some people do not like it that you refer to such a pilgrimage \nas tourism but then some would say it is indeed religious tourism. Now, there is the aspect of \nhospitality in there since it concerns travel, it concerns hotels, it concerns a trip.  \nHowever, those issues deserve our attention and it is precisely the reason why the laws \nare being revamped and I totally agree with him that there are many people who organise this \nmini-pilgrimage, the Umrah. Then they organise it in such a way where there is no need for \nan insurance, there is no need for any payment; there is no need for any insurance cover for \nany trip that goes bad. There is no need for an insurance for someone who may fall ill at a \ndestination and then have to get medical assistance. So, all those issues are really, clairement \nd’actualité. \nIn other jurisdictions, there are only organisers who are properly registered and who \nconform with the need to have a proper insurance for the protection of those who travel that \nare given the right to organise. So, all this, I can assure the hon. Member and all those \nlistening to me inside here and outside, that all those matters will be taken into consideration \nin the new law that is being prepared as we speak. \nMadam Speaker: I just noted that it does not only concern the Muslim pilgrimage but \nall sorts of pilgrimage. I understand, so maybe the Attorney-General is listening. \nMr Mohamed: Madam Speaker, this question is specifically with regard to Umrah, so, \nobviously I am not here pronouncing myself in any way whatsoever with regards to any other \nvoyage of religious nature apart from Umrah. So, I am limiting it to that. Okay?  \nMadam Speaker: Okay! But you will follow up Dr., I am sure. \nOkay, so now we have hon. Lobine, First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix! \nCAMP FOUQUEREAUX FOOTBALL GROUND – RIVER PLAINES WILHEMS – \nSTATE – CLEANING & DESILTING EXERCISES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/37",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 37,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/37) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the river running adjacent to the Camp \nFouquereaux Football Ground, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nMunicipal Council of Vacoas-Phoenix, information as to – \n(a)  whether an assessment of the state thereof has recently been carried out and, if so, \nindicate the outcome thereof, and  \n(b)  when was the cleaning and desilting exercises thereof last carried out to prevent \nflooding and ensure proper water flow thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Municipal Council of Vacoas-\nPhoenix that the river running adjacent to the Camp Fouquereaux Football Ground is River \nPlaines Wilhems. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the House that a site inspection \nwas carried out on 03 December 2025 in the presence of the Local Disaster Management \nCoordinator, officers of the Public Health and Public Infrastructure Department and \nMunicipal Councillor. During that inspection, the port of the river extending from the Shri \nShambhoonath Temple to the M2 Motorway covering approximately 600 metres and \nincluding the stretch adjacent to the Camp Fouquereaux Football Ground was thoroughly \nexamined. The river was found to be clean and free flowing and no desilting works were \ndeemed necessary at that time. \nFurthermore, the Land Drainage Authority (LDA) has confirmed on 13 March 2026 \nfollowing the review of the site observation and photographic evidence submitted by the \nCouncil that the specific stretch of the river does not require additional desilting works at \npresent and that routine cleaning operations are sufficient to maintain proper water flow. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, the most recent cleaning \nexercise at that location was carried out by the Municipal Council of Vacoas-Phoenix from 26 \nto 30 January 2026. This exercise included the removal of vegetation, cutting of grass and \nshrubs and the clearing of fallen trees and waste, in order to ensure the unobstructed flow of \nwater and prevent any risk of flooding. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that rivers within the Municipal jurisdiction are \nmaintained on a regular cycle of six to eight weeks and the next cleaning exercise was that \nstretched in schedule for 16 March 2026 in line with the Council’s Maintenance Programme.  \nAs regard desilting works, the last desilting operation for River Plaines Wilhems \ncovering approximately 3.26 kms, including the stretch adjacent to the Camp Fouquereaux \nFootball Ground was carried out between 03 March 2025 and 14 April 2025 in accordance \nwith the technical specification and guidelines of the LDA. \nAn assessment of rivers within the municipal area was also conducted in December \n2025 and January 2026 in preparation for further maintenance work. Financial clearance has \nalready been conveyed to the Municipal Council for desilting operation for the Financial Year \n2025-2026 and bids received following the tender exercise which closed on 06 March 2026 \nare currently under evaluation. \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed that the Council has sought the technical advice of \nthe Geotechnical Unit of the Ministry of National Infrastructure as excessive desilting in \ncertain location may potentially lead to erosion or instability of river banks. \nThe technical site visit is scheduled on 20 March 2026 to determine whether any further \nengineering intervention may be required. In the meantime, the Municipal Council will \ncontinue regular monitoring and routine cleaning of the rivers to ensure free and safe water \nflow at all times in line with the recommendations of the LDA. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Lobine! \nMr Lobine: Madam Speaker, one supplementary! May I ask the hon. Minister, whether \nhe would consider a site visit, a constat de visu with all stakeholders, especially with regards \nto the river banks? The last time that those river banks were revamped, was when hon. \nBhagwan was Minister of Environment in 2000 and the river banks in almost all the rivers \nwithin this locality, even at Quinze Cantons is in a very deplorable state. Yes, they do \ncleaning but the river banks are in a very deplorable state.  \nIf you could arrange for a site visit with all stakeholders, with the Junior Minister, with \nMinister Assirvaden, you will see de visu that this is not the case with regard to the river \nbanks, whether you would consider same? \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, in this regard, I am agreeable to carry out a site visit \nwith all the stakeholders including with the representatives of the Municipal Council, even \nthe Land Drainage Authority, Ministry of Environment, Forestry Division and other \nconcerned stakeholders to assess and in the safety of the communities. So, for the time being, \nI have a picture which was sent by the Council that the river is clean. So, never mind, we can \nmake a site visit with all the others and ministers also. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: You have a picture but it’s only for you. Never mind. \nHon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet!  \nFISHERMEN CARDS – APPLICATIONS & ISSUANCE – SWIMMING TESTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/38",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 38,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/38) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked the \nMinister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to \napplications for Fishermen Cards, he will state the number thereof received over the past one \nyear, indicating – \n(a)  the number thereof awaiting determination, and  \n(b)  when the applicants will be called to undertake the required swimming tests.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much. Madam Speaker, I wish to refer the hon. Member to \nmy reply made to PQ B/987 at the Sitting of 11 November 2025 where I had informed the \nHouse that our lagoons have been overexploited and depleted over the years. The previous \ngovernment had gone against sustainable fisheries by issuing a substantial number of new \nFishermen Cards. \nFurthermore, at the Sitting of 09 December 2025, I had informed the House that with a \nview to ascertaining the genuineness of registered fishermen, my Ministry had submitted the \nlist of 2,546 fishermen to the Mauritius Revenue Authority and the Central Business \nRegistration Department. The information submitted by these institutions is being examined \nby my Ministry. \nFurthermore, I am informed that from January to December 2025, a total of 62 \napplications for fishermen cards have been received at the 14 Fisheries Posts across the \nisland. Another 2 applications have been received between January 2026 to date.  \nAs regards parts (a) and (b) of the question, these 64 applications are not being \nprocessed for the time being. A decision will be taken after the verification exercise. Madam \nSpeaker, I reiterate that as a committed and responsible government, we have a duty to \nprotect the traditional fishermen.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Apollon.  \nMr Apollon: Thank you, Madam Speaker, just to make an appeal to the hon. Minister \nnot to make the same mistake like the previous government giving cards at the eve of the \nelection.  \nCan the hon. Minister inform the house if there are any new criteria to maintain better \ncontrol while delivering these cards? \nDr. Boolell: I am not going to circulate the list of criteria for eligibility but as you \nknow, we are seeing to it that there is full compliance to existing criteria.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Beechook.  \nMr Beechook: Madam Speaker, will the hon. Minister conduct a thorough enquiry on \nthe number of fisherman cards that were distributed to undeserving political agents who don’t \neven know how to tie a l'hameçon on the eve of the last elections and following that, give due \nconsideration to deserving people who are waiting since long for a fisherman card? \nDr. Boolell: I am not going to say that we are long way to Tipperary but if he had heard \nme well, I have said that the matter has been referred to MRA and the Central Business \nRegistration specifically to look into those who should not have been given these fisherman \ncards.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Rookny.  \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, it is one thing that the fishermen having fisherman cards \nare eligible to weather allocations and quite another for genuine fishermen wanting to earn a \nliving going out to fish. \nWill it be the case that those people will be precluded from fishing if they don’t have \nfisherman cards? \nDr. Boolell: Are you referring to the appeal which you made to me and the Junior \nMinister?  \nMr Rookny: No. \nDr. Boolell: What are you saying? in relation to…? \nMadam Speaker: The question is simple. If people don’t have fisherman cards, can \nthey still fish? \nLike if I want to go and fish, can I? \nDr. Boolell: Of course not!  \nMadam Speaker: We are good. \nDr. Boolell: The law is an ass but we have to comply to the provisions of the law. \nMadam Speaker: Exactly.  \nOkay, we don’t all go fishing every day.  \nMs Savabaddy, First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue. \nSPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS AUTHORITY – PRIMARY SCHOOLS – AUTISTS \n– ADMISSION DELAY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/39",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 39,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/39) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the \nSpecial Needs Education Authority, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, \ninformation as to the number of primary schools falling under the purview thereof, indicating \nthe reasons for the delay in respect of some children with autism not starting the school year \n2026 on time and whether the issues have now been resolved.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, at the outset, let me thank the hon. Member for \nthis question which is her third one related to autistic children after those she asked on 18 \nMarch and 17 June 2025. \nMadam Speaker, allow me to apprise the House that in accordance to section 5 of the \nSpecial Education Needs Authority Act, the main functions of the SENA are inter-alia to – \n(a)  register special education needs institutions, their teaching and non-teaching staff \nand any other resource person, and \n(b)  take appropriate action to ensure that special education needs institutions are \nmanaged in accordance with relevant laws, rules, guidelines, directives and \nstandards. \nMadam Speaker, the Special Education Needs institutions falling under the purview of \nSENA are as follows – \n12 SEN integrated units which are classrooms in public primary schools \ndedicated to SEN learners; \n7 SEN resource development centres which cater for children with severe \ndisabilities; \n47 NGOs providing services to SEN learners, and \n8 RCA SEN schools.  \nI would like to add that admission of SEN learners is not limited only to SEN \ninstitutions. In certain cases, SEN learners are also enrolled in mainstream primary schools \nwhich do not fall under the purview of SENA.  \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by SENA that a communiqué was issued on 09 May \n2025, inviting applications for admission of SEN learners in Grade 1 for the year 2026. Each \napplication had to be supported inter-alia by a medical certificate.  \n521 applications were received as from that date of issue of the communiqué until \nFebruary 2026. Out of these applications, 438 children turned up for screening exercises by \nallied health professionals in the SEN resource development centres. The mandatory \ncomprehensive screening is carried out to determine the educational placement and \naccommodation required. Out of the 438 children who were screened, 143 children were \nidentified to suffer from mild autism spectrum disorder. 32 of them were admitted in \nmainstream public and aided-primary schools as at 13 February 2026.  \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that there have been delays in the admission of these \n32 children because of lack of teacher assistants and carers. With a view to coping with the \nsituation, arrangements had been made by my Ministry for the reallocation of teacher \nassistants and carers in certain cases. In other cases, internal arrangements were made by \nschool management to accommodate the children with the assistance of teachers and support \nteachers in certain schools. \nAs regards the remaining children who suffer from higher forms of autism, they have \nbeen admitted in NGO SEN schools, SEN resource development centres and SEN integrated \nunits. Madam Speaker, I am also informed that there is currently an acute shortage of teacher \nassistants and carer on the local market.  \nMy Ministry is envisaging the following measures on the short and medium terms in \norder to palliate for the shortage – \n(1) Review the existing norms and standards to ease recruitment of assistant teachers, \ncarers, and medical specialists in some cases; \n(2) Contacting parents of children with disabilities who are willing to accompany their \nwards in the mainstream school on a voluntary and short-term basis; \n(3) Creation of post of teacher assistants and carers on the establishment of my \nMinistry in the forthcoming budget; \n(4) Accelerated training courses by the MIE to new recruits, and  \n(5) Working in collaboration with the Ministry of Health and Wellness to have the \nsupport of medical professionals.  \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, Ms Savabaddy.  \nMs Savabaddy: Thank you, Madam Speaker.  \nPourquoi ce sont les enfants autistes qui doivent faire les frais des carences \nadministratives alors qu’on doit leur donner le meilleur encadrement possible pour étudier ? \nLe ministre vient tout juste de faire mention à ma question parlementaire datant du 17 \njuin 2025 – alors vous avez fait mention d’unité intégrée, renforcée pour les enfants autistes. \nOù en sommes-nous ? \nDr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, as I said, one of the major problems that we are \nfacing is about staffing in that sector. Unfortunately, the number of our kids who need special \neducation needs is increasing and on the other side, we do not have trained professionals to \ncater for that sector. We are short of that; we are conscious. That is why I gave the five \nmeasures which are palliative in order to address that issue in the short and medium term.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Beechook and then Mr Juman.  \nMr Beechook: Madam Speaker, this is the paradox. On one hand, we are saying we \ndon’t have staff and on the other hand, I am aware of lots of cases where people who have \nbeen hired to work in SEN schools, are still awaiting registration. May I request the hon. \nMinister to look into all those pending cases of registration which might perhaps fill in those \nposts that are required to run these special schools for our special kids? \nMadam Speaker: Are you aware, hon. Minister? \nDr. Gungapersad: Yes, Madam Speaker, let me inform the hon. Member that there \nwas a communiqué whereby we wanted to recruit and many of those persons – perhaps the \nhon. Member may give me the list later on – they do not have the official and administrative \nrequirements in order to be recruited.  \nAt times, we even ask parents of these children to come and help as carers.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Juman.  \nMr Juman: Madam Speaker, in the same vein, with regard to teachers, carers and \nassistant teachers, can the hon. Minister inform the House the number of pending applications \nat the level of SENA? \nMadam Speaker: Is it not the same question? \nMr Juman: Yes, the same question. \nMadam Speaker: It is the same question? \nMr Juman: Yes, but the number of applications pending. \nMadam Speaker: So, you want to know the number? \nMr Juman: Yes. \nMadam Speaker: It looks like it is a serious topic. \nDr. Gungapersad: It is indeed, Madam Speaker. It is indeed a serious issue and I have \ntaken good note. I thank him and hon. Ms Savabaddy for their personal involvement in caring \nfor those autistic children. I will ask SENA to do the needful. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, we are done more or less. Hon. Ms Savabaddy, you are \nhappy? \nMs Savabaddy: Yes. \nMadam Speaker: So, B/40! \nDUCRAY HEALTH CENTRE – UPGRADING & MAINTENANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/40",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 40,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/40) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Ducray \n(Abercrombie) Health Centre, he will state whether consideration will be given for the \ninfrastructural upgrading and maintenance of the premises thereof and, if so, when.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I presume that the health centre to which the hon. \nMember is referring to is, in fact, Sainte-Croix Community Health Centre (CHC) which is \nlocated in Ducray Street, Sainte-Croix. The Sainte-Croix Community Health Centre \ncomprises several services. Previously, all the facilities were dispensed from a small building. \nHowever, the facility had been upgraded with the provision of an additional building to \npalliate the lack of space. \nIt is worth noting that Sainte-Croix Community Health Centre is the only CHC which \nprovides dental services and has also extended opening hours up to 6 pm during weekdays \nsimilar to that of an area health centre to cater for the large catchment area. Nevertheless, I \nunderstand that the space of the CHC is insufficient and the facility cannot be further \nexpanded. The relocation of the CHC could be considered in the event funds and lands are \navailable in the vicinity. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that maintenance work such as cleaning of the premises \nand minor repairs were carried out at the level of Dr. Jeetoo Hospital. Moreover, I am \ninformed that external and internal painting had been carried out in October 2025 to address \nleakages reported in the Pharmacy Unit. Materials are being procured for waterproofing \nworks. I am also informed that several thefts have been reported over the years. \nOn 09 January 2026, four air conditioning compressors have been stolen and the matter \nwas reported to the police of Abercrombie on 13 January 2026.  \nSpecifications for the replacement of air conditioning are awaited from the Energy \nServices Division of the Ministry of National Infrastructure to enable my Ministry to launch \nthe bids. These will be done on a fast-track basis. \nFurthermore, the Commissioner of Police is being requested to carry out frequent \npatrols in the area to deter any illicit activities. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMs Savabaddy: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Puis-je demander à l’honorable ministre \ns’il existe au niveau de son ministère un département pour inspecter régulièrement les \ninfrastructures comme les centres de santé et si des rapports sont rédigés, car le centre de \nsanté de Ducray à Sainte-Croix est dans un état déplorable et ceci depuis l’année dernière, \nmonsieur le ministre ? \nMr Bachoo: I have already mentioned some reparation works have already been \nconducted. But the best solution would have been to move to another building. That will not \nbe possible because of financial constraints. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMs Savabaddy: Thank you. Le ministre est-il au courant de la chaleur étouffante au \ndispensaire de ce même centre de santé, également d’un stock de médicaments périmés, et \nqu’est-ce qui peut être fait à ce sujet ? Depuis l’année dernière, la situation est comme telle. \nMr Bachoo: I have mentioned that there have been thefts. The air conditioning \ncompressors were stolen and that explains the reason. Secondly, I will not be in a position to \nlaunch bids unless and until I receive the specifications from the ESD of MNI. Once I get it, I \nwill move for it. I am aware of the problem. That is why I can assure you, once the air \nconditioning is carried out, then other problems would be taken care of. \nMadam Speaker: I think we have gone around that question.  \nHon. Seeburn! \nST HUBERT REGION – PUBLIC BUS TRANSPORT – AVAILABILITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/41",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 41,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/41) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to St Hubert, St Hilaire and \nneighbouring villages, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land \nTransport Authority, information as to the measures implemented/being envisaged to increase \nthe availability and regularity of public bus transport thereat, and increasing the number of \nbus services or reviewing existing routes and schedules for enhanced service thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, in my replies to PQs B/84 and B/22 at the \nSittings of 17 December 2024 and 04 February 2025, the House was apprised of the \noperational situation on buses from St Hubert to Curepipe and Mahebourg, as well as the \nmeasures being implemented by the NLTA to address irregularities and to improve service \ndelivery thereto. \nMy Ministry is cognisant of the persistent transport problems faced by inhabitants of \nthe region for their daily communing needs.  \nFollowing representations made to me by elected Members of Constituency No. 11, \nyourself, hon. Ms Babooram and hon. Ramdass, and other complaints received on \nmalpractices occurring along Route no. 87, an enquiry was carried out at the level of my \nMinistry. That enquiry disclosed that the operations record filled by bus operators for \ncompensation payments and subsidies with the NLTA had been falsified. The matter was \nconsequently referred to CCID for investigation during the course of 2025. I am not too sure \nwhether this has been done very often, but we did it.  \nMadam Speaker, I am informed by the NLTA that there are currently seven buses which \nare licensed to operate along Route 87. \n Of these buses, three buses are operated by the individual bus operators and three \nbuses by the NTC while one bus owned by an individual operator is presently off road due to \nmajor repairs. I am further informed that the passenger demand is relatively low along that \ncorridor particularly along the segment from St Hubert to Riche-en-Eau via St Hilaire up to \nthe junction of Deux Bras Road, New Grove. I am made to understand that as buses proceed \nbeyond New Grove and overlap with other routes, passenger accommodation becomes \nnormal and some vacant seats are generally observed. \nHowever, in the light of ongoing representations from the inhabitants, several meetings \nhave also been held by the NLTA with the NTC and individual bus operators to ensure that \nservices are operated in accordance with the approved timetable. Verification by the NLTA \nconfirmed that the bus services, including school services from Curepipe, were generally \nbeing provided at an interval of 30 minutes. The NLTA is also closely monitoring bus \noperation along that route since mid of February 2026. In cases where a bus is temporarily off \nroad, buses from nearby routes are redirected along Route 87 by the NLTA as an interim \nmeasure to serve the commuters.  \nMadam Speaker, I have to point out that, most importantly, I have directed the NLTA to \ncarry out an assessment of bus services along the island and to identify all routes along which \nadditional buses may be required. The exercise is ongoing and there have been notices in the \npress recently. Based on the outcome of this survey, the NLTA will review the current bus \nallocation to ensure adequacy of public bus transport along routes, including St Hubert, St \nHilaire and neighbouring villages. \nMadam Speaker, very importantly, I have also been made aware that bus operators may \nnot be providing services to the satisfaction of commuters along several routes despite that \nthey benefit from government subsidies. \n In this respect, I wish to inform the House and the public who travels by bus that after \nmuch effort at my Ministry, the tender exercise for the design, supply, installation, testing and \ncommissioning of a fleet management system for public buses which will comprise an \nautomatic location system, a bus information system, a chef de gare application and a central \ncontrol system, amongst others, was floated internationally on the government’s e-\nprocurement website on 21 January 2026. The closing date is scheduled for 24 March 2026, \nthat is, next Tuesday, in a week’s time. \nMadam Speaker, I am confident that with this paradigm shift, with the use of \ntechnology, this system which uses GPS will go a long way to improve service essentially in \nthe following ways – \n(i) \nTo ensure that the bus companies provide the required number of trips for which \nthey are paid for, and \n(ii) \nTo allow the travelling public to know the Expected Time of Arrival (ETA) of \ntheir buses either on their mobile phones or on display panels. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, you are alright?  \nThird Member for Port Louis South and Port-Louis Central, Dr. F. Aumeer! \nPUBLIC HOSPITALS – MORTUARY FACILITIES – CAPACITY MANAGEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/42",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 42,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/42) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to mortuary facilities \nin the public hospitals, he will, in each case, state the maximum capacity thereof, indicating – \n(a) \nin the case of the said facility at the Dr A.G. Jeetoo hospital, the reasons why the \ncontractor has not started works thereat; \n(b) \noptions considered when same are full, and \n(c) \nwhether consideration will be given for the installation of a separate mortuary \nfacility in respect of Police cases within the Police Headquarters.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the maximum number of chambers in \ndifferent mortuaries is as follows – \n\nSSR Hospital – 12; \n\nVictoria Hospital – 9; \n\nSAJ Hospital – 18; \n\nJawaharlal Nehru Hospital – 12; \n\nBrown Sequard – 6; \n\nDr. Bruno Cheong Medical Centre – 9; \n\nNew Souillac Hospital – 6. \nMortuary facilities comprise space for performing autopsies as and when required and \ncold room for storage of corpses in chambers. These facilities existed at Dr. AG Jeetoo \nHospital since inception, but over time, the cold room became defective and beyond repairs.  \nMy Ministry has already initiated actions for the installation of a new cold room for \nstorage of corpses at Dr. Jeetoo Hospital. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (a) of the question, I am informed that on 11 December \n2023, a contractor was awarded the contract for supply installation, testing and \ncommissioning of a cold chambre for the mortuary of Dr. Jeetoo Hospital with a capacity to \naccommodate 12 bodies. It was due to be delivered within 8 to 12 weeks as from the letter of \nacceptance; works should have been completed by 04 March 2024. The supplier supplied the \ncold room on 01 July 2024 and installation was ongoing. \nIn January 2025, an inspection was carried out during which several shortcomings were \nnoted such as workmanship, traces of rust on interior frames, defective lighting features, \nexcessive condensation amongst others. \nDespite that the contractor was informed on several occasions to remedy the situation; \nan inspection carried out by the electrical engineer of the Ministry of National Infrastructure \nin August 2025 revealed that several issues had remained unsolved. \nMadam Speaker, meetings were held at the level of my Ministry. The contractor and \nthe advice of Attorney General’s Office was sought. The latter advised that although the \nMinistry is entitled to terminate the contract for non-performance, such action may result in a \nhigher cost and delays. \nI am informed that my Ministry accepted the proposal of the contractor for the \nprovision of new equipment for the cold chambre at Dr. Jeetoo Hospital with expected \ndelivery date of 29 January 2026 at no additional cost to the Ministry. \nDismantling and carting away of existing equipment had been completed and the \nconsignment would be shipped by air instead of sea expediate delivery. I have been informed \nthat the request of the supplier to supply, install and commission the equipment within two \nmonths had exceptionally been acceded to and the supplier has been requested to submit the \ndelivery date. \nMadam Speaker, in respect of part (b) of the question, I have been informed that as an \ninterim measure, my Ministry is procuring two refrigerated beds at hospital level. Tenders \nhave already been launched with closing date on 18 March 2026. In addition, corpses are \nbeing transferred to the mortuary of other public hospitals. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (c) of the question pertaining to the installation of a \nseparate mortuary facility, the matter has been referred to the Commissioner of Police for \nconsideration. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam Speaker, I have listened very attentively to the \nanswer given by the hon. Minister with regard to the delay in the implementation of a proper \nmortuary room at Dr. Jeetoo Hospital. May I ask the hon. Minister whether he thinks it is \nadvisable once again to give a further contractual agreement to a company that failed in toto \nto respect the specifications which it was given in the first place for mortuary namely, as he \nsaid: electrical defects, humidity but above all – sizes. I have been there; he has given \nmortuary that were fitted only for young adolescents and children. \nI think, in my honest opinion, hon. Minister, we should seek somebody else. We have \nwaited a lot. \nMr Bachoo: I totally agree with the hon. Member but advice was sought from the State \nLaw Office. The advice that I have received is that if you are going to terminate the contract \nfor non-performance, such action may result in higher cost and delays. And, secondly, well, \nthe hon. Member is aware that for such type of works, we have got hardly a few contractors \nand they do not even want to tender for such type of works. That is the reason why we have \ngiven him the last chance and at the same time at no additional cost from us. So, we are \nawaiting – this is the last chance we are giving, I do hope that they are going to accede to \nrequests and the work will be completed because I am aware of the problems that inhabitants \nof region are facing. I can assure the hon. Member that I am looking into the case personally. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: A quick question. Thank you, hon. Minister. May I ask the hon. Minister, \nin these circumstances as have happened at Dr. Jeetoo Hospital and which may happen in \nother regional hospitals in regard to keeping corpses for mortuary facilities or even autopsy, \nwhether we should have readily available, as he just said recently, what we call refrigerated \nbeds and cooling rooms that are readily available for those particular hospitals in the event \nthat we have a shortage of places to keep the bodies of loved ones and prevent the \npsychological trauma that people of Port Louis particularly have had with regard to Dr. \nJeetoo Hospital? Thank you. \nMr Bachoo: As far as other hospitals are concerned, we never had any such problem, \nwe have ample facilities. It is only exceptionally in Dr. Jeetoo Hospital that we had the \nproblem and that is the reason why we have ordered for the acquisition of two refrigerated \nbeds. But at the same time, I will have a look at other mortuaries where we have got corpses \nwhich are lying since long – even these have to be dispensed to ... There is a question on this, \nI am going to answer. \nMadam Speaker: Okay!  Hon. Dr. Aumeer, are you okay now? \nDr. Aumeer: I am fine. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! PQs B/43 and B/44 have already been replied by the hon. \nPrime Minister.  \nMIDDLE EAST GEOPOLITICAL TENSIONS – IMPACT ON FOOD SECURITY – \nMEASURES & DIVERSIFICATION STRATEGIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/43",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 43,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/43) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the escalating geopolitical tensions and the potential impact thereof on global trade \nroutes and supply chains, he will state if any assessment of the potential impact thereof on \nfood security in Mauritius has been carried out, indicating the measures being envisaged to \nensure continuous and adequate supply of essential food commodities, including \ndiversification of import sources or strengthening local agricultural production.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PNQ) \nMadam Speaker: So, now we have hon. Etwareea! \n \nFOND DU SAC – OPEN STREET MARKET – ACCIDENTS RISKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/44",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 44,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade",
      "question": "(No. B/44) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked \nthe Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade whether, in \nregard to the prevailing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, he will state – \n(a) \nwhether Government has conducted an assessment of the number of Mauritian \nnationals currently residing in the Middle East affected by the conflict;  \n(b) \nthe urgent measures and consular support put in place to ensure their safety and \nwell-being, and  \n(c) \nwhether a concrete evacuation and repatriation plan has been prepared, including \ntimelines and coordination with relevant authorities, for Mauritian citizens \nwishing to return home.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PNQ) \nMIDDLE EAST TENSIONS – FUEL & FOOD SUPPLY – PRECAUTIONARY \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/45",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 45,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D’or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/45) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the potential risks of accidents during \nthe Sunday open street market in Fond du Sac, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to where matters stand regarding the plan for the construction of a sheltered \nmarket in Fond du Sac.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, with regard to the potential risks of accident during the \nSunday open market held at Fond du Sac, I wish to inform the House that based on \ninformation obtained from the Mauritius Police Force Northern Division, no road accidents, \nsnatching or pickpocketing or any harassment, public nuisance, assault cases have been \nreported to the immediate vicinity of the market for the period January 2023 to 13 March \n2026. \nMadam Speaker, as regard to the plan for the construction of the sheltered market at \nFond du Sac, the project was initially identified as a project under preparation in 2021. At \nthat time an initial request was made to Compagnie de Mont Choisy Limitée (CDMC) for the \nallocation of approximately 19,500 m² of land forming part of Mont Choisy Smart City phase \n2 for the purpose of implementing this project. \nThe proposed acquisition of the land was to be considered under the provision of the \nSugar Industry Efficiency Act 2001 while matters relating to land conversion were to be \nexamined by the Ministry of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries. \nSubsequently, on 23 September 2024, CDMC informed the authority that it was \nagreeable in principle to transfer a plot of land of about 4 arpents 61 perches at the nominal \nprice of Rs1 for the implementation of a project. \nMadam Speaker, following a site visit effected on 10 April 2025 which I attended \ntogether with the hon. Minister of Education and Human Resource and the two hon. Members \nof the National Assembly of the Constituency No.6, representatives of the District Council of \nPamplemousses and officers of my Ministry, it was considered that the initial proposed extent \nof land would not be sufficient to accommodate the market and the necessary supporting \ninfrastructure. \nSubsequently, it was decided that a request be made for approximately 6 acres of land \nin order to cater for the construction of the sheltered market as well as parking facilities and \nother associated amenities required for proper operation of the market. \nThe District Council of Pamplemousses has accordingly made the request to \nCompagnie de Mont Choisy Limitée. By letter dated 25 November 2025, the company \ninformed that the request for 6 arpents of land was under consideration and that a reply would \nbe communicated upon completion of their evaluation. \nA further follow-up request was sent on 03 March 2026 and I am informed that a layout \nplan for the proposed development is currently being submitted to facilitate company’s \nconsideration of the request. \nMadam Speaker, my Ministry remain committed to the implementation of this project \nwith a view to providing a properly structured organised and safer market environment for \nboth vendors and members of the public. \nIn this regard, the District Council of Pamplemousses intend to resubmit the project \nunder the performance-based budget 2026/2027 as a project under preparation, so that once \nthe issue of land allocation is finalised, the design and implementation of the sheltered market \nat Fond du Sac may proceed. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! Okay! Hon. Etwareea! \nMr Etwareea: I would like to know what are the obstacles that are stopping the signing \nof the Memorandum of Association with the Mont Choisy Group so far? \nMr Woochit: As I said, Madam Speaker, the request from 4.61 acres has become 6 \nArpents. So, the request has been changed which has to be considered by the CDMC. \nSo, we have already sent two requests. So, we are waiting for the final reply from them. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, alright. Mr Beejan! \nNEW GOODLANDS MARKET FAIR – PROJECT COSTS – STALLS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/46",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 46,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D’or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/46) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the New Goodlands Market Fair, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the District Council of Rivière du Rempart, \ninformation as to the – \n(a) \ninitial and final project costs thereof; \n(b) \nnumber of stalls – \n(i) \nallocated, and  \n(ii) \navailable category-wise, and  \n(c) \nnumber of stall holders residing within the jurisdiction of the Rivière du Rempart \nDistrict Council.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed \nthat the New Goodlands Market Fair currently comprises three blocks, namely Block A, B \nand E. Prior to the pre-tender exercise carried out in 2018, the project initially consisted of \nfive blocks.  \nHowever, the financial clearance obtained at that time proved insufficient to implement \nthe project entirely. Consequently, the District Council of Rivière du Rempart, in consultation \nwith the then Ministry of National Infrastructure and Community Development, decided to \ndownscale the project and proceed with the construction of three blocks only, together with \nsupporting facilities such as parking areas, sanitary amenities, office and technical facilities \nand other associated site works.  \nFollowing the tender exercise conducted through the Central Procurement Board, the \ncontract was awarded on 02 October 2019 to RBRB Construction Ltd. The works were \nimplemented thereafter and the project was completed on 15 December 2023, following \nextension of time granted mainly due to COVID-19 pandemic, adverse weather conditions, \ndelays in shipment of materials and additional works required during this implementation. \nThe initial cost, final project cost and detailed breakdown of variation works, compensation \ncosts and consultancy fees are provided in the document which I am tabling before the \nHouse. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the District Council of Rivière \ndu Rempart that the New Goodlands Market Fair comprises a total of 536 stalls distributed \nacross several sections, including – \n\nvegetables; \n\nhaberdashery or general merchandise; \n\nSME; \n\nfood; \n\nmeat; \n\nfish, and \n\npoultry section on alternative days. \nWith regard to part (b)(i) and (b)(ii) of the question, out of the 536 stalls, 434 stalls \nhave been allocated and are currently occupied, while 102 stalls remain vacant. As regards \nthe haberdashery or general merchandise section, I am informed that the traders’ concerned \nhave not yet relocated to the new market as a case has been lodged before the Supreme Court, \nwith the matter scheduled for hearing on 16 June 2026. Nevertheless, approximately 190 \ntraders out of the 354 concerned, have already signed their occupational contract. \nWith regard to part (c) of question, I am informed that traders have been operating at \nthe old Goodlands Market since 1992. Following the separation of the District Council of \nRivière du Rempart and Pamplemousses in 2012, traders who were already established in the \nmarket were allowed to continue operating in the market where they were already trading, \nirrespective of their place of residence. The detailed list of stallholders and their respective \nplaces of residence is provided in the document which I am tabling before the House. \nMadam Speaker, with your permission, I am tabling the documents containing the \ndetailed breakdown of the project cost, the list of stakeholders and the distribution of stalls by \ncategory in the new market fair. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Given the information that the New \nGoodlands Market Fair operates on the mentioned days, I would like to ask the hon. Minister, \nwhether a feasibility has been done of opening the market fair on other additional days? If \nnot, can it be done? And what are the future plans to arrange for new allocation of stalls for \nnew applicants, including SMEs to operate on those days? Thank you. \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, as I told you, I am tabling all the documents. So, for the \npossibility of opening the market fair on other alternative days, as the market is under the \nmanagement of the District Council of Rivière du Rempart, I will submit the request to them \nto consider. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, fair enough. Okay, now B/47 has already been replied. Now, \nwe have the Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue, Mr Caserne! \nSTC – HEAVY FUEL OIL, MOGAS, DIESEL & KEROSENE – RESERVES – \nCONTINGENCY PLANS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/47",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 47,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/47) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to \nHeavy Fuel Oil, Mogas, Diesel and Kerosene, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the State Trading Corporation, information as to – \n(a) \nthe current quantity of each of these products held in strategic reserves in \nMauritius and the number of days of national consumption same represent, and \n(b) \nwhether contingency plans have been put in place to ensure continuity of supply \nin case of any disruption to imports arising from the prevailing conflict in the \nMiddle East and, if so, indicate the alternative sources of supply and logistical \narrangements identified to secure the continued availability thereof.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PNQ) \nABERCROMBIE – METHADONE DISTRIBUTION – PROPOSED RELOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/48",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 48,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/48) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to methadone \ndistribution at Abercrombie, he will state where matters stand as regard the proposed \nrelocation thereof, including when same will be relocated and the new location.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, with the setting of MUGA project in the vicinity of \nSainte Croix, a request was made to my Ministry to relocate the existing methadone \ndispensing site at Sainte Croix Methadone Day Care Centre, catering for some 230 \nbeneficiaries to ex-police divisional headquarters of Abercrombie, which was already \ndispensing methadone to some 376 beneficiaries. The relocation was effected at the \nbeginning of 2023.  \nThe House may wish to note that in March 2025, methadone was being dispensed to \nsome 635 beneficiaries at Abercrombie, leading to a large crowd, which posed safety and \nsecurity concerns for the beneficiaries, the general public and the officers involved in the \ndaily dispensing process. A request for the relocation of the site was made by the Divisional \nCommander from Abercrombie police station. \nMadam Speaker, in order to alleviate these pressures and to ensure a safer environment \nfor all stakeholders, a strategic decision was taken by my Ministry in April 2025 to relocate \napproximately 170 beneficiaries from Abercrombie site to Vallée des Prêtres police station. \nAs at 10 February 2026, some 448 beneficiaries are still registered to receive their daily \nmethadone doses at the Abercrombie site. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that at the meeting held with the Divisional \nCommander of Abercrombie police in November 2025, it was highlighted that recipients of \nmethadone had the habit of displaying antisocial behaviours and loiter around the place \nwhere the dispensing is made. It was stressed that inter-agency cooperation should be \nstrengthened to find sustainable solutions to such issues.  \nI am further informed that the National Agency for Drug Control, which is now the \napex body looking at the drug scourge is addressing this matter. My Ministry has also \nreceived a proposal by NADC for the setting up of one-stop shop addiction treatment services \nand integrated harm reduction clinic at Nicolay Road, Port Louis. The methadone clients \ncurrently at Abercrombie site will also be able to benefit from the services at the proposed \nsite at Nicolay Road. The possibility of gradual relocation of the clients at Abercrombie site \nto the proposed one stop shop addiction treatment services and the integrated harm reduction \nclinic at Nicolay will also be looked into by NADC and my Ministry once the one-stop shop \nhas been formally set up. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nMr Caserne: Thank you, hon. Minister. Once they are dispensed with methadone, we \ncan see a crowd of these people still remaining in the surroundings. May I know in the short \nterm, what are the solutions that the Minister can propose together with all those framing, \nincluding police officers, members from the Ministry of Health  who can assist to alleviate \nthe current situation at Abercrombie? \nMr Bachoo: This is a situation which is there throughout the country. Wherever \nmethadone is dispensed, this is the same problem everyone is facing. We keep on getting \nrequests from Members of Parliament that from X particular site, it had to be removed to Y \nbut when are changing the site, you are transferring the problem from one place to the other. \nWell, it is a human problem, you have to bear with it. The police are doing their level best \nand once that set up will be in the new place, I do hope we will be able to get rid of those \npeople’s antisocial elements from all the regions to one particular place where the police will \nbe in a much better position to control them. Unfortunately, the problem is same everywhere. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, now we have the Second Member for Grand Baie and Poudre \nd’Or, Mr Beejan! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 6 – BUSINESS LICENSING FEES – AMOUNT COLLECTED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/49",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 49,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. B/49) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Tourism whether, in regard to licensing fees collected from businesses in \nConstituency No. 6, since 2015 to 2024, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nMauritius Tourism Authority, information as to the quantum thereof, category-wise.",
      "answer": "Mr R. Duval: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Tourism Authority that it does not \nkeep the figures in respect of licensing fee collected from businesses constituency-wise. \nHowever, the hon. Member is interested in having the total licensing fees collected by the \nTourism Authority island-wide for the period of 2015 to 2024. \nI may ask the Tourism Authority to compile same for circulation to the hon. Member. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, okay. The Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and \nSouillac! \nINVALIDITY PENSIONS – MAJOR REFORMS – IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/50",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 50,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/50) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \nwhether, in regard to the Invalidity Pensions, he will state where matters stand as to the \nproposed major reforms thereof, indicating the proposed timeline for the implementation \nthereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Subron: Madam Speaker, I wish to thank the hon. Member for her renewed interest \nin this particular reform. \nMadam Speaker, the present system has caused much suffering and indignity for our \npeople. Thus, the disability pension reform represents an important and much awaited step \ntowards ensuring that the disability support system in Mauritius becomes more inclusive, \nequitable and responsive to the real needs of persons with disabilities in their daily lives. \nAs I previously informed the House in my statement made to the Sitting of the National \nAssembly of 08 July 2025, and in my replies to the Parliamentary Questions B/501 at the \nSitting of 13 May 2025 and B/842 at the Sitting of 07 October 2025, my Ministry is currently \nworking on a reform initiative for disability-related pensions. The major reforms that were \nidentified include, inter alia – \n(a) \nthe introduction of a hybrid assessment model to replace the 100% medical-based \nmodel; \n(b) \nthe introduction of a graduated support model to replace the all or nothing model, \nand  \n(c) \nthe introduction of multi-disciplinary assessment panels to replace the medical \nboards. \nMadam Speaker, Government, at its meeting of 28 November 2025, took note of the \nstatus of the proposed reform, which would be implemented over two phases, namely – \n\nPhase 1 which will include the updating of medical guidelines for disability \nassessment and the introduction of a graduated support model whereby those \ndeemed not eligible for the Basic Invalidity Pension (BIP) could qualify for an \nInclusive Living Allowance (ILA). The ILA will replace the Disability \nAllowance and its quantum will be revised higher. The Disability Allowance is \ncurrently Rs2,500 per month, and there are only around 750 beneficiaries as \ncompared to 28,000 beneficiaries for BIP. \n\nPhase 2 which would include the introduction of a hybrid assessment model \nbased on both medical and functional criteria as well as the replacement of the \ncurrent medical boards with multi-disciplinary assessment panels. Thus, also \nconforming to the human rights-based approach recommended by the United \nNations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in its concluding \nobservations of September 2024 on Mauritius’ compliance. \nMadam Speaker, currently, my Ministry is completing Phase 1 of the proposed \ndisability reform, particularly an enhanced medical guideline for disability assessment, as the \nexisting one dates back to 2016. Many shortcomings and gaps have been identified in same.  \nThis Phase 1 reform initiative has involved significant technical works so far. I am \nproud to say that it was all an in-house and local expertise inputs. Back in October 2025, \ninputs and insights have been gathered by way of survey questionnaire from the medical \npractitioners of the Medical Unit of my Ministry, who serve the medical boards, which \noperate under the aegis of the aforementioned unit, to identify the gaps and challenges \nregarding the effective implementation of the medical guidelines.  \nSubsequently, in November 2025, a series of consultative meetings have been held with \nmedical specialists from both the public and the private sectors, who serve on the Medical \nAppeal Tribunal, which operates under the aegis of the Medical Unit of my Ministry. A draft \nrevised medical guideline has already been worked out by my Ministry and submitted to the \nMinistry of Health and Wellness for validation early this year.  \nThe revised guideline will place greater emphasis on functional disability and \nlimitations in activities of daily living, introduce more comprehensive criteria for assessing \nlong-term health conditions, and improve the consistency and transparency of disability \nassessment as well as reviewing the re-assessment period for the renewal of benefits. Thus, \nthe core of the technical work for the implementation of Phase 1 has been completed by my \nMinistry. We are now expecting validation by the end of this month from the Ministry of \nHealth and Wellness. \nMadam Speaker, in parallel, we have also worked out the financial implications and the \nnumber of new beneficiaries of the proposed reform. The estimate of Phase 1 of the reform is \nsome Rs5 million per year. Consequently, financial clearance would be sought from the \nMinistry of Finance, including for the proposed introduction of the new Inclusive Living \nAllowance.  \nCabinet’s approval would be sought accordingly for the implementation of Phase 1 of \nthe reform in this financial year. It would amount to around Rs125 million, while Phase 2, \nsubject to all clearances being obtained, is projected to be implemented within 12 months of \nthe implementation of Phase 1. For now, let us keep our fingers crossed. Thank you, Madam \nSpeaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Beechook: May I request the Minister, in light of the reform that has been \nannounced, to please make sure that people who have one of their legs chopped, lower limb \nchopped or are half blind in one eye, do not have to go to medical boards every year in order \nto secure their pension? It is common sense that their leg is not going to grow or perhaps they \nwill never recover their eyes. So, I do not understand why these people are requested to go \nand appear in front of a medical board every year. \nMr Subron: I thank the hon. Member. This issue is being taken onboard by Phase 1 of \nthe reform. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Yes, hon. Dr. Ms Daureeawo! \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Will the hon. Minister consider \namendments with a view to strengthening the appeals mechanism, more particularly, \nreducing delays for such appeals? \nMr Subron: Yes, we are making quite substantial and significant efforts to reduce the \ntime for people to go to the medical boards. We hope that Phase 1 of the reform will ease the \nre-assessments and appeals to the Medical Tribunal. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, one more! Then, hon. Juman. \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Can I add to what hon. Beechook stated earlier on? Will the hon. \nMinister consider introducing or implementing regular reviews in the law to ensure decisions \nto discontinue pension claims are fair and consistent? \nMr Subron: We will take this into consideration, hon. Member. \nMadam Speaker: Of course! Yes, hon. Juman! \nMr Juman: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Hon. Minister, can I know whether the \nproposed reform will also consider to review the Carer’s Allowance? \nMadam Speaker: The current allowance? \nMr Juman: Carer’s Allowance. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nMr Subron: This is not part of Phase 1 of the reform, but the redefinition of the criteria \nof the Carer’s Allowance is being reviewed. It was in our manifesto to upgrade the Carer’s \nAllowance, and all will depend on the financial situation of the country and the budget. But \nwe will make the proposal. Last year, we made a proposal for the gradual increase of the \nCarer’s Allowance, but the economic situation was not good enough to cater for this. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! You are very popular, hon. Minister! \nMr Seeburn: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Being given that the draft guidelines have \nalready been forwarded to the Ministry of Health and is now awaiting approval, is the hon. \nMinister in a position to confirm to the House whether he is willing to accept those families \nwho are suffering prejudice, whether it can be dealt with a fast-track system? \nMadam Speaker: In the meantime, you mean?  \nMr Seeburn: In the meantime! \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Subron: We will consider it and see but... My friend is working very hard on the \nvalidation of the Phase 1 of the report. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! \nAn hon. Member: … \nMadam Speaker: Oh my God! I know it is a very sensitive issue. \nMr Subron: Yes, please go on! \nMadam Speaker: Dr. Ms Daureeawo first; it was her question! \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Okay, thank you, Madam Speaker. Are there plans to digitalise the \nwhole monitoring and application process? \nMr Subron: Yes, there was. I answered a question last year in Parliament. The ESS \nsystem is being implemented and we hope that in two years’ time the whole system of social \nsecurity will be digitalised. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, Dr. Prayag, then Dr. Aumeer, then Mr Lobine! \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Given that the carer’s allowance causes \nprejudice to the female population of beneficiaries, given that it depends on the household \nincome for the beneficiary, can we even consider to phase it out, if not, then, consider to take \nan action concerning it quicker than waiting for the Phase 2? \nMr Subron: The proposal will be made by the Ministry in the context of the coming \nbudget, then it won’t be my decision, it will be a governmental decision. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam Speaker. In the event of the major disability reform \nbeing implemented, may I request the hon. Minister to see with the Members of the Medical \nBoard that they have a more compassionate approach to the chronically ill and those who are \nbed-ridden, so that they are not to be asked to come on stretches and in ambulances at the \nMedical Board to be assessed but rather send a doctor at home for assessment? Thank you. \nMr Subron: I thank the hon. Member for this observation. We are aware of the \ndifficulties of many people to attend medical boards and we have taken a decision that all the \npeople above 90, the medical assessment is being done at domicile. \nMadam Speaker: Above 90? \nMr Subron: Above 90! Now, we are trying to reduce it to 85 and then 80. This is the \nobjective.  \nMadam Speaker: I think we are going to be in trouble. I have Mr Lobine, I have Mr A. \nDuval and it seems it’s a question which is of great interest. \nMr Subron: Yes, I love it! \nMadam Speaker: I don’t want to do… \nMr Subron: This means that the reform is an important one! \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister, since on 09 December, I got carried away and I am \nsorry, my dear Chief Whip. I don’t want to get carried away today although I also feel very \nstrongly about it. \nMr Lobine! \nMr Lobine: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister, is he in a \nposition to inform the House how many pending appeal cases do we have? Because it seems \nthat a lot of people are waiting for their appeal to be heard. Do you have such a list or figures \nso that you can provide to the House, please? \nMr Subron: I don’t have the list but I can table it if you want. But I can say that out of \n100 cases, examined by the Board, 70% are granted and the 30% is going to the Medical \nTribunal. But I can get the correct figures. I already gave it to the National Assembly \npreviously. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, Mr A. Duval! \nMr A. Duval: In fact, it’s on the same question. It had been reported in the past that \nmore than half of the cases on appeal are overturned decisions of the Medical Board. One \nreason being that they do not have specialist doctors. The second reason being that they do \nnot have access to medical files of the patients. Therefore, is the hon. Minister going to look \ninto that aspect with his reform urgently to ensure that people are given a fair consideration \nfor their application? \nMr Subron: Of course, this is a major issue that will be taken in Phase 1 and in Phase \n2. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, last one! I understand it’s a very touchy issue. Last one! \nMr Jhummun: Yes, can this exercise be made more scientific and systematic, so that \nwe don’t have so many people who go on appeal? Because that 60% criteria is too debatable. \nMr Subron: It is precisely what we are changing. \n Madam Speaker: Oh my God! Dr. let’s keep it. Talk to each other, please! C’est \ninsatiable cette question ! Okay, vous allez parler entre vous. Je suis sûre que vous allez \ntrouver des solutions.  \nLet me carry on because we haven’t got much time left. Now B/51 is already answered, \nMs Anquetil. B/52 is again Dr. Ms Daureeawo! \nPROMOTION OF SPORTS – OCTOBER 2024-17 MARCH 2026 – \nINITIATIVES/PROGRAMMES IMPLEMENTED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/51",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 51,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/51) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked \nthe Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the prevailing \ngeopolitical tensions in the Middle East, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nState Trading Corporation, information as to the measures taken by the Corporation to secure \nthe country’s supply of fuel, notably petrol and diesel, as well as essential food commodities.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PNQ) \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. En passant, j’ai deux questions. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nMs Anquetil: J’avais deux questions. \nWill the hon. Prime Minister provide the House with some details of the terms of the \nGovernment-to-Government Agreement with India on the supply of petroleum products \nwhich was signed in 2006 by the former Labour Government, and subsequently, résilié under \nthe former MSM Government? Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Can you provide it? \nThe Prime Minister: You are right to point out. I did point out it was a guaranteed \nsupply. We had cut out the middleman. Madam Speaker, you know why we have a \nmiddleman? \nMadam Speaker: We all know. \nThe Prime Minister: We all know they do not work for free. They take commissions. \nWhat do they do? They share the commission. That is what was happening. That is why the \ncontract was resiliated. \nAn hon. Member: Pa konn pran komision, konn pran brayb! \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, bribe! Unfortunately, that has happened. \nMadam Speaker: Do you have the documents she was saying? \nThe Prime Minister: No, we have not finalised the agreement yet, but it would be \npractically under the same terms. I do not know what Indian Oil will want additionally, but \nthis is what is being worked out. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, second question! \nMs Anquetil: I thank you very, very much. \nMadam Speaker: Parce que c’est vous ! \nMs Anquetil: Thank you. \nWill the Prime Minister confirm that Mauritius was amongst the first few countries to \nhave successfully repatriated our nationals safely back to Mauritius? \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, this is absolutely right. I saw on the news that France and \nUK are having difficulties. We had repatriated our nationals who wanted to be repatriated. \nMadam Speaker: Including our hon. Member! \n(Interruptions) \nMs Anquetil: Including Adrien Duval! \nMr A. Duval: I would tell a different story! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker, I have a question. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, of course. But we are happy to see him here! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, I would tell a different story, but today is not the time.  \nMadam Speaker, may I ask the Prime Minister on… \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Chut! \nMr A. Duval: In fact, it is on air connectivity, and he partly answered earlier during the \nPNQ. He has stated that Air Mauritius is to operate one additional flight – he did not specify \nthe frequency – for this month and three additional flights for the month after.  \nMy question is: Given the shortfall of up to 1,500 passengers per day coming through \nEmirates, mainly from European markets, has the Prime Minister discussed with British \nAirways, Air France and Air Seychelles to temporarily increase their flight connectivity to \nMauritius to cater for that shortfall? Because 18 days since the conflict, it does not look like \nEmirates will be in a position to operate the daily three flights anytime soon. So, has the \nPrime Minister spoken to them? What is the plan on this score? \nThe Prime Minister: I know that Air Mauritius was looking at all the possible, but \nthey, themselves, decided they will add additional flights. Also, as you rightly said, Emirates \nis not going to add additional flights now, but they did give us the additional flights which we \nrequested. I was told they were speaking to British Airways and to other airlines, but nothing \nconcrete has come out of that. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, may I ask a second question? \nMadam Speaker: Quickly! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, the second issue with that is that prices of air tickets, \nespecially for Air Mauritius, have gone through the roof. So, allowing others to cater for the \nshortfall would help, at the end of the day, people who are flying. So, does the Prime Minister \nhave any plan to control the rising prices of air tickets, which have tremendously increased in \nthe last three weeks? \nThe Prime Minister: We are not in a position to control these prices because fuel \nprices are going up. And there is the appreciation of the dollar and the euro. Both of them are \ngoing up. So, it is beyond our control to try to control that price. \nMadam Speaker: One moment! Hon. Etwareea, you had question B/61. Do you have a \nsupplementary? You are okay.  \nMIDDLE EAST TENSIONS – FOOD SECURITY – ALTERNATIVE IMPORT \nSOURCES & LOCAL PRODUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/52",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 52,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/52) Dr. Ms Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the promotion of \nsports, he will state the initiatives and/or programmes implemented since October 2024 to \ndate, indicating the outcomes thereof, including whether same have positively impacted \noverall sports growth, athletes and grass roots participation.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, this question provides an excellent opportunity to \nhighlight the comprehensive and strategic action which my Ministry has undertaken to propel \nMauritian sport forward. \nMy Ministry’s approach has been holistic focusing on three core pillars namely, –  \n\ngrass root participation and community engagement; \n\nhigh level sports excellence, and \n\ndevelopment of sports infrastructure. \nThe above initiative implemented have indeed yielded significant positive outcomes across \nall these areas. I believe we should also highlight that my Ministry operates, amongst others, \nthrough its various executive arms namely, – \n\nThe Mauritius Sports Council; \n\nThe Trust Fund for Excellence in Sports; \n\nThe National Youth Council; \n\nThe Côte d’Or National Sports Complex, and  \n\nThe Commission Nationale du Sport Féminin. \nIt is though these institutions that multiple types of activities are organised for different \nstrata of the population. At grassroot participation and community engagement level, the \ninitiative includes among others the revival of the inter-collège sports competition, the ‘Anou \nTransform Nou Landrwa’ Programme and Course de l’unité. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to high level sport, my Ministry commitment has been \nequally robust ensuring our athletes sign at the regional and international stage. High-level \nsport excellence in Mauritius is driven by my Ministry through the High-Level Sports Unit, \nfocussing on elite athlete development and international performance. Key initiatives include \ngrant to national sport federation, sport organisation, the High-Level Sport Assistance \nScheme and substantial cash prize scheme for medals at major international competition. \nMoreover, the Trust Fund for Excellence in Sport support athletes at secondary \nvocational and tertiary levels. We have to mention here the individual performance of high-\nlevel athletes such as Kimberley Le Court and Noémie Alphonse at international level. \nMadam Speaker, concerning our sport infrastructure, it is essential to provide our \nathletes with modern sport infrastructures with a view to elevating athletics’ performance as it \ndirectly impacts safety, consistency and training effectiveness. Well-designed sport facilities \nminimise injury risks, reduce fatigue and enable athletes to train at higher intensities and with \ngreater precision.  \nTo this endeavour, my Ministry has moved to a proactive strategy of modernising our \nsports facilities. Key upgrades were completed at the Serge Alfred Swimming Pool, the Mare \nD’Albert Swimming Pool and Beau Vallon Football Pitch ensuring our communities have \nsafe and modern venues to practice. The grounding achievement was the inauguration of Sir \nSeewoosagur Ramgoolam Sport Complex in Triolet in November 2025. \nThis Rs200 million state-of-the-art multi-disciplinary facility is a gamechanger for the \nregion. This complex is a tangible example of our commitment to decentralising access to \nsport. It provides a dedicated space for over 350 people to engage in everything from futsal \nand volleyball to pétanque and jogging. This directly combats non-communicable diseases, \nfosters community wellness and provides a high-quality training venue for local athletes.  \nSubstantial investment will be required to give our sports infrastructure the lettres de \nnoblesse and requests for funding infrastructural projects are being made by my Ministry in \nthe forthcoming budget exercise. However, Madam Speaker, it would not be possible for me \nto enumerate all the initiative programmes implemented by my Ministry. I am thus tabling a \ncomprehensive list of these initiative programmes. These are testimonies that the policy and \nstrategies put in place are yielding result and serve as benchmark for the other athletes.  \nMadam Speaker, to conclude, the initiative programmes implemented have had a \nprofoundly positive impact. We have reenergised grassroot participation through inter-\ncollege, anou transform nu lendroit, force de l’unité, focus on the elite athletes, development \nand international performance and build and upgrade the infrastructure necessary for future \ncampions. The foundation for a vibrant, inclusive and successful sporting nation has never \nbeen stronger. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nYes, question. \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Madam Speaker, could the hon. Minister state what is being done \nto upgrade and modernise sports facilities in the Constituency of No.  \n13 and 14, given that we do not have any stadium or a full-fledge complex in that region? \nMr Nagalingum: It is in the agenda of the Ministry to organise a meeting with the \nConstituency No. 13 because we have had some meetings with different constituencies in the \nrecent past. So, in the near future, we are going to have a meeting and we can discuss \ndifferent activities that we can organise together.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes. \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Could the hon. Minister confirm or indicate whether government \nis encouraging private sector investment and sponsorship in sports development? \nMr Nagalingum: Yes, of course, this is in our agenda.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, you have finished.  \nOkay, I am going to be sweet.  \nMs Anquetil : Je vous remercie infiniment, Madame la présidente. B/53.  \nBELLE ROSE MARKET FAIR – PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION – DETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/53",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 53,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/53) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the proposed construction of the \nBelle Rose Market in Quatre Bornes, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nMunicipal Council of Quatre Bornes, information as to the expected start and completion \ndates thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, in regard to the proposed construction of Belle Rose \nMarket Fair in Quatre Bornes, I am informed by the Municipal Council of Quatre Bornes that \na plot of state land of an extent of 6548 m2 at Victoria Avenue Belle Rose, previously leased \nto the State Investment Corporation Ltd and sublet to Mauritius Jute & Textiles Industry \nProperties Company Ltd, has been identified for the implementation of this project. \nFollowing the cancellation of the lease, financial clearance was conveyed on 27 \nOctober 2023 for the payment of the compensation amounting to Rs5, 293,393.56 to the \nMauritius Jute & Textiles Industry Properties Company Ltd for added value to the site. The \ndeed of cancellation was subsequently transcribed on 27 December 2024 and the plot of state \nland was vested in my Ministry for the construction of the marker fair.  \nHowever, I am informed that the transfer to certificate for the plot of land is still \npending signature before a notary public and despite several requests made by my Ministry to \nexpedite the matter, the formalisation of the transfer has not yet been completed. As a result, \nthe site has not yet been formally handed over for the start of the construction works. \nIn the meantime, preparatory works have been initiated by the council. Bids were \ninvited on 28 January 2026 for the demolition of abandoned buildings and the clearing of \nland at Avenue Victoria with the bid closing deed set for 12 February 2026 and the three bids \nwere received. The bid evaluation exercise is currently in progress and the contract is \nexpected to be awarded by the end of this month with demolition and clearance works \nscheduled to be completed by 13 May 2026.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Yes, very short and sweet.   \nMs Anquetil: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I have got only one supplementary. Will \nthe hon. Minister state the facilities that will be provided in the new Belle-Rose market? \nThank you.  \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, the project will provide market stalls, washroom \nfacilities and space for bus holding area and a large parking space for avoiding traffic jams.  \nMs Anquetil: Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Now, time is up.  \nI have to also tell you that several PQs, of course, have been withdrawn: B/57, B/58, \nB/59, B/60, B/62, B/63, B/66, B/68, B/69, B70, B/71, B/73, B/74. \nThank you.  \nHon. Prime Minister, motion.  \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that all the business on today’s \nOrder Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10. \nMr Mohamed rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister! \nSTATEMENT BY MINISTER \nIMF SPECIAL DATA DISSEMINATION STANDARD PLUS –ADHERENCE OF \nMAURITIUS \n(4.40 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I would like to make a \nstatement on the adherence of Mauritius to the IMF Special Data Dissemination Standard \nPlus, the SDDS Plus, as from today.  \nMadam Speaker, as the House is aware, the independence of institutions, such as \nStatistics Mauritius and the Bank of Mauritius, were grossly undermined before November \n2024. Pressure was exerted on the Statistics Mauritius and the Bank of Mauritius to dress up \nofficial statistics, thereby giving a false impression of progress and weakening their \nindependence at the same time. We pledged when we took office to reverse this. \nWe have done so. \nThese institutions now work with restored autonomy and professionalism, and the \ncredibility of our national statistics has been rebuilt. \nBut we are not stopping there. We are making further strides in our endeavour to secure \nthe highest standards of transparency and accountability in the production and dissemination \nof statistics. Today, Madam Speaker, I am glad to announce to the House, and to Mauritians \nin general, that Mauritius is adhering to the SDDS Plus, which is the highest tier IMF data \ndissemination standards, which is the most advanced and demanding of all international data \nstandards.  \nI would here like to add that, as a result of my Government’s efforts, Mauritius \nsubscribed to the first level of international standards, the General Data Dissemination \nSystem (GDDS) in September 2000.  It was under my Government that Mauritius graduated \nto the SDDS in February 2012. Madam Speaker, we wanted to send a powerful signal to the \nworld that Mauritius strictly adheres to the principles of transparency and accountability with \nrespect to the production and dissemination of data.   \nIn 2013, during an IMF Technical Assistance mission, we, through the then Statistics \nBoard, seized the opportunity to request the IMF’s assistance in identifying the new \nrequirements of SDDS Plus and the steps needed towards meeting them.   \nUnfortunately, this was followed by, I must say, inaction for the following 10 years – \n10 lost years! \nLast year, I decided to revive this important endeavour. I set up a Steering Committee \nunder my Office to speed up its implementation.  \nToday, Madam Speaker, I am glad to announce that we have reached the highest level, \nwhich is the SDDS Plus.  \nMs Anquetil: Bravo! Bravo! \nThe Prime Minister: The adherence to SDDS Plus means that we are now agreeing to \npublish more data, faster, and with tighter guarantees on quality, integrity and openness, \nespecially for government finance, the financial system, and external exposures. In practice, \nthe SDDS Plus requires Mauritius to meet detailed IMF benchmarks on the coverage, the \nfrequency and timeliness of a set of core and additional datasets that are considered essential \nto monitor vulnerabilities and risks in modern economies. \nThis is, Madam Speaker, a demanding standard, but meeting it sends a powerful \nmessage to investors, to rating agencies, and also to international partners that they can rely \non our statistics when taking decisions about Mauritius.  \nThis graduation is, therefore, not just symbolic; it has concrete implications for our \neconomy.  \nThe strategic benefits for Mauritius are multi-fold – \n(a) \nReinforced International Credibility. This is especially valuable for \nsafeguarding Mauritius’ reputation and increasing global scrutiny of international \nfinancial centres. \n(b) \nStronger Investment and Rating Agency Confidence. For a small open \neconomy reliant on capital flows, this credibility premium is strategically \nimportant and for Moody’s, it will be credit positive. \n(c) \nEnhanced Financial Stability Oversight. For Mauritius, where financial \nservices represent quite a high percentage of our GDP, as we know, at one point it \nwas even 15%. But this now is a significant share of GDP. Therefore, this risk \nmonitoring capacity is critical. \n(d) \nAlignment with Financial Centre Ambitions. It would serve, Madam Speaker, \nas a reputational anchor consistent with global financial stability standards. \n(e) \nInstitutional and Governance Strengthening. These improvements will have \nlasting benefits well beyond compliance. \n(f) \nEfficient Access to International Markets. For a small open economy like us, \nadherence will facilitate access to markets for both sovereign and the private \nsector at a lower borrowing cost. \nMadam Speaker, for all these reasons, SDDS Plus is not merely a statistical benchmark, \nit is a strategic instrument for Mauritius.  \nI would like to reiterate that our adherence will, inter alia, reinforce credibility as a \ntransparent international financial centre, strengthen financial stability oversight, enhance \ninvestor confidence and support long-term economic resilience.  \nIn a global environment of heightened scrutiny and interconnected risks, SDDS Plus \nwill provide Mauritius with a strong institutional signal of commitment to the highest \nstandards of macro-financial transparency. \nMadam Speaker, I would like to highlight here that the graduation to SDDS Plus is \nindeed a major achievement. Only 31 countries in the world have met this standard, most of \nwhich are OECD or High-Income countries. Furthermore, I should add that Mauritius is the \nonly, only African country to adhere to the SDDS Plus.  \nThrough this achievement, we now stand alongside advanced countries, particularly in \nterms of transparency, credibility and integrity of our official statistics.  \nLet me also highlight that adherence to the SDDS Plus will make it extremely difficult \nfor any government to try to manipulate data. \nLet me end by thanking the IMF for their generous and dedicated support. They \nresponded quickly to field several missions to assist us. In particular, the Report on the \nObservance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), it was a mission which, Madam Speaker, did a \nfull audit of our overall statistical system and framework, and this was instrumental for us to \nreach the SDDS Plus.  \nI also wish to thank all those who have worked diligently to achieve our goal, including \nofficials from my Office, the Ministry of Finance, Statistics Mauritius and the Bank of \nMauritius. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMs Anquetil: Bravo PM! \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. Do you mind, all of you, if we have \na short break? \nOkay, let us go for tea! \nAt 4.48 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.17 p.m., with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: You may be seated! \nPUBLIC BILLS \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Optical Council (Amendment) Bill (No. I of 2026) \nwas read a first time. \nSecond Reading \nTHE LAW REFORM COMMISSION BILL  \n(No. XXXI of 2025) \nOrder for Second Reading read. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Attorney-General! \n(5.18 p.m.) \nThe Attorney-General (Mr G. P. C. Glover, SC): I beg to move that the Law Reform \nCommission Bill (No. XXXI of 2025) be read a second time. \nThis Bill, Madam Speaker, is at its core about strengthening one of the quiet, but \nessential institutions of our legal system. The Law Reform Commission seldom catches \nheadlines. Yet, it is only through sustained methodical and principal review that the law can \nremain intelligible, relevant and just.  \nThe Law Reform Commission of Mauritius was first established in 1993 through the \nLaw Reform Commission Act 1992 which itself was repealed in 2006 with the enactment of \nthe Law Reform Commission Act 2005.  \nSince then, no improvement has been brought. It is now time to bring about sweeping \nreforms to set up a new framework fit for the demands of the present. The stark reality, \nMadam Speaker, is that the LRC has, over the last 20 years, published no less than 195 \npapers. Yet, few, too few, may I add, recommendations have found their way to legislation. To \nquote the opinion paper of the LRC in support of this fundamental change in the legislation, I \nquote – \n“This persistent gap between research and enactment is symptomatic of a deeper \nstructural weakness. The Commission has been tasked with a mission, but not endowed \nwith the legal instruments necessary to make its work effective.” \nThe purpose of the Bill is, therefore, simple enough – to repeal the existing Law \nReform Commission Act to replace it with a legislative framework more suited to the needs \nof our country today. \nLaws, Madam Speaker, do not stand still. They must evolve with society, with \neconomic realities, with technological change and with our collective aspirations as a \ndemocratic state governed by the rule of law. The Law Reform Commission has, over the past \nyears, contributed meaningfully to this process. Experience has shown however, that its \nexisting statutory framework has become too narrow, and at times, administratively \nconstraining. \nThis Bill seeks to give the institution the tools it needs to discharge its mandate more \nfully. I must immediately point out, Madam Speaker, that the impetus for this reform came \nfrom the Commission itself. It was the Commission, which having worked within the \nconstraints of the existing Act for a number of years, identified the areas in which the \nlegislative framework fell short and formulated proposals for its modernisation. That is as it \nshould be. \nNo institution is better placed to assess the adequacy of its own governing statute than \nthe one which must operate it daily.  \nI was happy to examine those proposals carefully with members of my office. Having \nsatisfied myself that they were well-founded and in the public interest, I have deemed it fit to \ncarry them forward in the form of this Bill. \nMadam Speaker, I shall now delve brief into the principal provisions of the new law \nand the reasons which have prompted them.  \nClause 3(1) of the Bill establishes the Commission, defines its core responsibility, that \nis, to keep the laws of Mauritius under review and to propose reforms aimed at simplifying, \nmodernising and consolidating those laws.  \nImportantly, clause 3(2) of the Bill provides that “the Commission shall, in the \ndischarge of its functions and exercise of its powers, act independently and impartially and \nshall not be under the direction or control of any person or authority.” \nThe Commission is also constituted as a body corporate under subclause (3), and these \nprovisions give the institution a clear statutory identity and the autonomy necessary to carry \nout serious reform work.  \nClause 4(1) of the Bill redefines and expands the functions of the Commission. It \nexpressly empowers the Commission to engage in research and studies to ensure that the laws \nof Mauritius evolve to meet the contemporary needs and challenges of society and the legal \ncommunity. \nThis reflects that a deliberate shift in philosophy. Law reform should not be purely \nreactive. It should be anticipatory. It should identify emerging issues before they harden into \nsystemic conditions and problems. \nClause 4(1) of the Bill also provides that the Commission may consider proposals for \nreform made to it by the Attorney-General or by any Ministry. \nUnder the previous Act, only the Attorney-General could direct the Commission to \nexamine any aspect of the law. The extension to Ministries is an important development. In \npractice, Ministries are closest to the operational realities of legislation within their respective \nsectors. By enabling the Ministries to make formal proposals, this Bill fosters a more \ncollaborative and informed reform process across Government.  \nThe same clause confirms the Commission’s power to make recommendations to the \nAttorney-General and any Ministry on its own initiative. This is not an incidental point. It \nunderscores the intellectual independence of the Commission and its role as a body capable \nof generating reform ideas grounded in research, consultation and comparative analysis. \nClause 4(1) of the Bill further provides for the Commission to request information from \nany Ministry, organisation or individual in relation to the law reform process, and to engage \npublic involvement by publicising its work and conducting public hearings. \nLaw reform, Madam Speaker, must not be an insular exercise. It must be informed by \npublic participation and professional expertise.  \nClause 4(2) of the Bill adds a practical requirement: where the Commission makes \nrecommendations to the Attorney-General or any Ministry, it shall, as far as practicable, \nattach a draft Bill to those recommendations. This ensures that reform proposals are not \nmerely conceptual but are carried through to the level of initial legislative drafting. \nClause 4(3) of the Bill requires the Commission to be proactive and submit to the \nAttorney-General, at least once every year, a programme for the review of specific aspects of \nthe laws of Mauritius with a view to their development or improvement.  \nThis introduces discipline of forward planning that was absent from the previous \nframework.  \nA further innovation, Madam Speaker, lies in the introduction of structured post-\nlegislative analysis. This is new. Clause 5 of the Bill provides that where legislation has been \nenacted wholly or partly on the basis of the Commission’s recommendations, the \nCommission may subsequently monitor its operation, assess whether the objectives set out in \nits report or recommendations have been achieved, identify any unintended consequences or \ndeficiencies arising from the enactment, and, where necessary, make further \nrecommendations for reform.  This is a significant step forward.  \nToo often legislation is passed and thereafter assumed to function as intended – and \nmore often than we would like to admit, it does not! \nA mature legal system, Madam Speaker, must be willing to review itself. Post-\nlegislative scrutiny allows to refine the law in the light of experience rather than theory alone. \nClause 6 preserves the Attorney-General’s power to direct the Commission to examine \nany aspect of the laws of Mauritius at any time. The Commission is required to report to the \nAttorney-General on the results of any such review, including recommendations as it deems \nnecessary.  \nRecently, Madam Speaker, I have asked the LRC to review the functions of the Judicial \nand Legal Service Commission and to report on what obtains in other Commonwealth \njurisdictions, especially where there is now a need to separate the functions of that \nCommission in a Judicial Service Commission on the one hand, and a Legal Service \nCommission, on the other. The LRC’s recommendations are eagerly awaited. \nClause 7 of the Bill addresses a practical difficulty which has arisen in the past. The \nBill designates the Attorney-General’s Office as the liaison authority were the Commission \nrequests information from any Ministry. The Solicitor-General shall appoint an officer of the \nAGO to act as the liaison authority’s representative.  \nIn reality, delays or reluctance in providing information have sometimes impeded \nreform initiatives. By formalising this liaison mechanism, the Bill seeks to ensure that work is \nnot stalled by administrative obstacles. \nPart III of the Bill deals with the Administration and Management of the Commission.  \nThe Commission is to be administered by Law Reform Board constituted under Clauses \n8 and 9 with such broad representations brought from the Judiciary, the Office of Attorney-\nGeneral, the Office of the DPP, the private legal profession, the University of Mauritius and 2 \nrepresentatives of civil society – and now, and that is the novelty, the Director of the Institute \nfor Judicial and Legal Studies. \nThis recommendation of the LRC was grounded in commonsense but was also a legal \nimperative. The presence of a Director-General of the IJLS will add another perspective and \nwill ensure that the Commission has at its disposal the specialised experience of an institution \ndedicated to advanced legal education, research and training. \nThe Board is empowered to set up Advisory Committees under Clause 11 to assist in \nthe discharge of its functions. \nNow, Clauses 12 to 14 provide for the staffing of the Commission, including the \nappointment of a Chief Executive Officer qualified in law and experienced in legal research, \na Secretary, and such other officers and consultants as the Commission considers necessary. \nPart IV provides for the financial governance of the Commission, including a General \nFund, annual estimates of income and expenditure to be submitted to the AGO and an annual \nreport and audited accounts to be laid before the Assembly by the Attorney General. \nThe House will note, in particular, the savings and transitional provisions under clause \n24 which ensure continuity by preserving the position and terms of appointment of existing \nstaff and Board members.  \nAll rights, obligations and liabilities subsisting in favour of or against the Commission \nunder the repealed Law Reform Commission Act shall, obviously, continue to exist under the \nnew legislation, and all assets and funds shall vest accordingly. This is both fair and \npragmatic. Institutional reform, Madam Speaker, should not unnecessarily disrupt the human \nand operational foundations upon which effective public bodies depend. \nMadam Speaker, beyond these specific provisions lies a broader a vision. The \nstrengthening of the Law Reform Commission is part of the wider commitment to the quality \nof our legislation. Good governance requires not only the enactment of laws, but their \nconstant refinement. It requires a willingness to simplify where complexity has accumulated, \nto modernise where provisions has become obsolete, and to consolidate where fragmentation \nhas impaired coherence. \nThis new term, Madam Speaker, will thus see landmark legislation being introduced in \nthis House, to enact profound change in the investigation of the serious crime, a new \napproach to certificates of character, the revamping of the organisation of sports in this \ncountry, the setting up of a modern child adoption framework, a review of sexual offences, a \nnew Domestic Abuse Bill and much awaited amendments to the Criminal Code, including, \ninter alia, the addition of feminicide to the list of offences against the person. \nAfter that even more legislative improvement will be coming, and having a fully \nempowered Law Reform Commission will only make it faster and more potent. \nIn supporting this Bill, Madam Speaker, hon. Members are adjusting the machinery of \nthe statutory body, but they also reaffirming the principle that the law must remain a living \ninstrument, one that truly serves the people of Mauritius. \nAnd with these words, Madam Speaker, I commend this Bill to the House. \nMr Mohamed rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \n(5.32 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Housing and Lands (Mr S. Mohamed): Madam Speaker, I have \nlistened with a lot of attention and interest to the hon. Attorney General and he has been very \nexplicit and in a very detailed manner, explained the purpose and the reasoning behind this \npiece of legislation. So, let me at the outset congratulate the hon. Attorney General and the \nofficers of his Office who have done once again a formidable job in preparing this piece of \nlegislation. \nIt is in my view very important to set the scene in order to show what his intent is but \nlet me very briefly comment on an aspect of the law which I find very interesting and it is \nnew. It is at clause 3(2) which talks about the independence, impartiality of this commission. \nNow, this is a very important part. Cela peut passer inaperçu but so important. That \nshows that this is an institution that has a lot of value to this Government. An institution, \nbecause it has its value, it is being put in the law that it will operate independently and \nimpartially. And not only that, it goes as far as to say that it shall not be under the direction or \ncontrol of any person or authority. And for that matter, it also means not under the control of \nGovernment or any other entity whatsoever. When you look at the old law – well, the actual \nlaw before it is repealed – this element of impartiality and independence was not there. Not to \nsay that they, in any way, acted under the control of any authority but to underline that part in \nthe law, is what makes this piece of legislation, this Bill that is proposed, very modern and in \nline with all the legislations that exist in other Commonwealth jurisdictions such as Australia, \nUnited Kingdom and New Zealand. \nThe other element that I find of utmost interest is the post-legislative analysis. Very \noften, we are to ponder why is it important to have the possibility to have a post-legislative \nanalysis of a piece of legislation and I connect this with the public involvement in law \nreform, hearings that can be conducted by the Law Reform Commission. Imagine the \nscenario that you have a piece of legislation that is passed and you do not have, as a matter of \nstatute, the power for an analysis post the legislation being passed in Parliament. Then, you \nwill have to wait for the Cabinet of Ministers, the Ministers concerned by certain pieces of \nlegislation, to go to Cabinet, give instructions to the Attorney General’s office, and then have \na new proposal for changes to the law whereas, if you have a Law Reform Commission that \nwill monitor the operation of an enactment as it is proposed here, where it has been wholly or \npartly based on its recommendations; if you are going to have a commission that is going to \nmonitor the operation, assess – as the Bill says – the extent to which the enactment has \nachieved its objectives or not, propose changes, corrective measures and at the same time, if \nyou have that very same commission that will hold hearings, listen to people, listen to experts \nwho will say exactly where you have to bring corrective measures. This is a very important \nelement within this legislation. \nAnd when I have, Madam Speaker, read the other law reform bodies that exist in the \nCommonwealth, it is clear that it is now in line with many other jurisdictions and this is why \nI once again would like to congratulate the Attorney General. With that piece of legislation as \nproposed, what do I surmise? That clearly, there is better governance. With this piece of \nlegislation as proposed, there will be better governance. It is more effective reform – I have \njust spoken about the post-legislative analysis – there will clearly be greater transparency in \nthe way that things will run from thereafter with public hearings and formal reporting that \nwill improve trust because at the end, we have to improve trust with members of the public at \nlarge. Faster reform, this is another element that is brought forward. The Bills then will be \ndrafted with recommendations, will speed up parliamentary consideration. There is no doubt \nabout that.  \nAnd I end on that responsible stewardship. When you take note of the provisions in the \nBill for explicit budgeting, auditing and transition safeguards to protect resources and \npersonnel, this is responsible stewardship. So, for all those reasons – I say it again – better \ngovernance, more effective reform, greater transparency, faster reform and responsible \nstewardship, I congratulate the hon. Attorney General once again.  \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Your winding-up speech! \n(5.38 p.m.) \nMr Glover: Madam Speaker, may I now present my summing-up which obviously will \nbe short and sweet given the fact that we have not had much objection to this Bill and to add \nto the words of hon. Mohamed on the Bill, it is indeed an institution which has a lot of value \nfor this Government. And what I want to add at this stage is, in fact, this Bill came to the \nAGO as an appendix to the paper issued by the LRC after its opinion came of its own volition \non the amendments which the LRC thought had to be brought to the Act in order for them to \ndo better work. And today, the Chief Executive Officer of the LRC is present to witness the \npassing of this new legislation, which will give, of course, a serious impetus to the legislative \nprocess. \nAnd, I do not think that there is much to add except to confirm what my learned friend \nhas just stated, that it is now in line with most of the other Commonwealth jurisdictions \nwhich are of the same democratic system. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. You have to commend the Bill again. \nMr Glover: I commend the Bill to the House. \nQuestion put and agreed to.   \nBill read a second time and committed.  \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(Madam Speaker in the Chair) \nThe Law Reform Commission Bill (No. XXXI of 2025) was considered and agreed to.   \nOn the Assembly resuming with Madam Speaker in the Chair, Madam Speaker reported \naccordingly.   \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Law Reform Commission Bill (No. XXXI of 2025) \nwas read a third time and passed. \nMadam Speaker: Adjournment! Hon. Prime Minister! \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Tuesday 24 March 2026 at 11.30 a.m. \nMr Mohamed rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned! \nAdjournment matters! Yes, hon. François! \nMATTERS RAISED \nRODRIGUES – 15 MARCH 2026 TORRENTIAL RAIN – DAMAGES & REMEDIAL \nACTIONS \n(5.43 p.m.) \nMr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues): Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker, with your permission, I will raise two matters this evening. The first \none is addressed to both the hon. Prime Minister, in his capacity as Minister responsible for \nRodrigues and Minister of Finance, and also to the hon. Minister of National Infrastructure \nand NDU, highlighting the recent torrential rain, causing severe flooding, which hit \nRodrigues on Sunday 15 March.  \nThe northern road traffic movement was affected. All radiers, of course, around \nRodrigues became impracticable. Worryingly, the ICU at Queen Elizabeth Hospital was \ninundated and evacuated. Agricultural valleys were inundated and there were landslides \naround a few residential properties. The problem is not anew, but the urgency to address it is \nnow greater than ever, and some require immediate remedial measures. \nMadam Speaker, I will urge, in particular, the hon. Minister of National Infrastructure \nand the NDU, together with engineers and expert staff, to travel to Rodrigues at the earliest \nopportunity. A site visit is essential to see the situation at first-hand, to assess the scale and \nthe damage, and to work closely with the Regional Assembly to determine the necessary \nremedial actions.  \nSuch a visit would also accelerate the implementation of the NDU, LDA and RRA \nidentified and approved drainage projects, which I rightly proposed during my tenure as \nformer PPS for Rodrigues. The projects were due to start by year 2022-2023 and completed \nby year 2024-2025 for earmarked funds of around Rs3 billion, but were, unfortunately, \ndelayed and cancelled by the whims and caprices of people.  \nThe project comprises, amongst others, drains, Port Mathurin Phase III, including \nnetworks from Fond La Digue, Pointe Canon, Montagne Fanal and Camp du Roi, Grand \nBaie, Anse aux Anglais and Accacia. They also include the raising of several radiers at \nDiamant, Anse Pansia, Baie du Nord, Rivière Coco and Mourouk.  \nMadam Speaker, over and above the list mentioned, emergency attention must now be \ngiven to the road and drain behind the Queen Elizabeth Hospital at Crève Coeur, and the \nconstruction of a bigger culvert at Baie Lascar junction serving Queen Elizabeth Hospital, \nand drain bridges at Port Mathurin Phase III. \nSo, I respectfully call upon the hon. Prime Minister to consider the authorisation of a \none-off allocation or reallocation of funds so that urgent repairs, maintenance, desilting, \nrehabilitation and infrastructural works can be undertaken without delay. Attention must also \nbe given to the radiers along the Songes-Anse Raffin Coastal Road as well as those located \non the link coastal road from Anse Fémie, Gravier to Var Brûlé. \nMadam Speaker, the recent flooding has, once again, highlighted a reality, that the \ndrainage and flood mitigation challenges in Rodrigues can no longer be delayed and \npostponed. The NDU must reprioritise needs, particularly in the context of the forthcoming \nbudget proposals, in consultation with the RRA. \nMadam Speaker, despite the people of Rodrigues’ resilience… \nMadam Speaker: Not too… \nMr François: This is very important. Yes, I know. I am within… \nMadam Speaker: This is adjournment matters. Don’t make a long statement! \nMr François: I just want to complete the information for the benefit of House and the \npeople of Rodrigues, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker, there is also a human impact. To conclude on this matter, whenever \ndisaster events hit Rodrigues, people need to hear that their concerns are timely heard and \nsupported. I, therefore, appeal and trust that the Central Government and the RRA will \nconsider long-term and short-term relief measures or temporary hardship relief mechanisms \nor support to assist affected public in coping with the loses, and to address in a sustainable \nmanner any flooding challenges facing Rodrigues. \nI thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, thank you for your first adjournment matter. Yes! \nThe Prime Minister: First of all, I express our sympathies to the people of Rodrigues. I \nmust tell hon. François that I spoke to the Chief Commissioner the other day, yesterday, I \nthink, or the day before. I expressed my sympathy. He explained to me exactly what you \nwere saying. I have asked hon. Gunness, who is the Minister responsible for NDU, to go to \nRodrigues to see, as you said, on site what needs to be done. I think he is going to leave, \nprobably early next week or by the end of the week. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, your second matter! \nAn hon. Member: Huh? \nMadam Speaker: C’est la démocratie ! C’est la démocratie ! \n(5.48 p.m.) \nRODRIGUES – GYNAECOLOGICAL CARE – ADDITIONAL GYNAECOLOGISTS \nPROVISION \nMr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues): Thank you. Madam Speaker, my \nsecond matter is addressed to the hon. Minister of Health, and it concerns gynaecological care \nin Rodrigues. At present, gynaecologists are posted in Rodrigues for a period of only one \nmonth. This means that any person having gynaecological health problem or a pregnant may \nbe followed by as many as eight different gynaecologists during her pregnancy. Each \nspecialist may have a different medical approach. This clearly affects the continuity and \nquality of care for patients.  \nI have also been informed that upon mutual agreement, some specialists spend only 15 \ndays in Rodrigues. One can easily understand the consequences of a situation for patients \nwho require regular examination.  \nRecently, there was an emergency case at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, where the only \ngynaecologist who was supposed to consult patients at La Ferme Area Health Centre could \nnot attend. Patients had to be sent back and their appointments re-scheduled. \nMadam Speaker, as the hon. Minister, himself, mentioned in a previous reply, the \nnumber of caesarean cases is increasing. I am also informed that maternal deaths are showing \nsigns of increase, even if some cases may, unfortunately, be inevitable. These situations call \nfor urgent attention as Rodrigues currently has only one administrative structure in the health \nsector. \nMadam Speaker, Rodrigues cannot continue to rely on a gynaecological system that \nlacks continuity in such a critical field of health care. In my regard, I humbly request the hon. \nMinister to look seriously into this matter and to also consider renewing – this is very \ninteresting – the previous agreed arrangement between his Ministry and the former OPR \nRegional Government to recruit gynaecologists from India. This initiative had been pursued \nbefore and proved beneficial for Rodrigues.  \nMadam Speaker, the people of Rodrigues deserve stable and reliable gynaecological \ncare. I rely on the usual collaboration of the hon. Minister and his Ministry. I thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister! \nThe Minister of Health and Wellness (Mr A. Bachoo): Madam Speaker, I am \nconscious that there is only one gynaecologist we are sending monthly. As a result of the \nintroduction of 24/7 by the previous government regarding gynaecologists and paediatricians \n– they were bound to work for 24/7 –, this led to the resignation of dozens of such specialists \nfrom the government service. This is the reason why I see there is a big scarcity of \ngynaecologists and paediatricians in our hospitals.  \nThe Public Service Commission has already invited applications. I do hope we do get \nsuch specialists so that I can increase the number of specialists going to Rodrigues.  \nAt the same time, we are negotiating with the Indian authority, the Indian hospitals, and \nI believe that I will be able to get a few gynaecologists so that I can help you. \nMadam Speaker: Here you are! Thank you very much, hon. Minister! \nThank you, everybody! \nAt 5.52 p.m. the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 24 March 2026 at \n11.30 a.m. \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nPRESIDENT OF SEYCHELLES STATE VISIT – JOINT MANAGEMENT AREA \nDISCUSSIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/54",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 54,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/54) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nEnvironment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in regard to hazardous \nsubstances and waste in Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nEnvironment Division of his Ministry, information as to the – \n(a)  protocol and procedures, if any, put in place for collection, transportation, storage \nand disposal thereof and, if not, indicate the measures being envisaged, in \ncollaboration with the Rodrigues Regional Assembly, to address this issue, and \n(b) \ndetails of hazardous waste inventory in Rodrigues and those that should be \nshipped to Mauritius for disposal.",
      "answer": "Reply: Hazardous wastes are wastes, that even in low concentration, have the potential \nto affect human health or the environment because of its chemical, physical, or biological \ncharacteristics. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the House that Rodrigues does \nnot have a comprehensive hazardous waste management system for the collection, \ntransportation, storage and disposal of hazardous wastes generated on the island. Hazardous \nwastes generators willing to dispose of their waste are legally required to obtain prior \nclearance from the Environment Division of the Commission for Environment by filling in a \nprescribed application form.  \nThey are also made aware of the authorised disposal methods and approved disposal \nsites as follows – \n(i) \nAccacia disposal site in Rodrigues for electronic wastes; \n(ii) \nRoche Bon Dieu in Rodrigues Dumping Site for damaged neon lamps; \n(iii) Exportation of used batteries and scrap metal to Mauritius by recyclers, and \n(iv) Exportation of used oils (about 12,000 litres per annum) to Mauritius for \ntreatment. \nThe House may wish to note that, as at date, no hazardous chemical wastes have been \nexported from Rodrigues to Mauritius for subsequent storage at the interim storage facility \nfor hazardous wastes and export to licensed recovery/disposal facilities abroad.  \nAs regards part (b) of the question, it is noted that no hazardous waste inventory figures \nwere reported for Rodrigues in the last hazardous waste inventory exercise that was \nconducted in 2011. A new and comprehensive hazardous waste inventory exercise is being \nconducted for both Mauritius and Rodrigues under the GEF-ISLANDS Project.  \nThe contract for conducting a comprehensive national hazardous waste inventory for \nMauritius and Rodrigues was awarded to the Consultant, Strategic Networking Partners and \nConsulting Ltd, on 21 August 2025. A first visit to Rodrigues in connection with the \ninventory exercise has been effected in November 2025 and it is expected that the study will \nbe completed by September 2026. \nThe House may further note that the new hazardous waste inventory exercise will assist \nin policy development, regulatory enforcement, and sustainable management of hazardous \nwastes in Mauritius and Rodrigues. Additionally, it is also envisaged to develop a long term, \nintegrated National Hazardous Waste Management Strategy and Action Plan for Mauritius \nand Rodrigues. The inventory exercise and strategy and action plan will provide the \nnecessary framework to develop a proper hazardous waste management system for \nRodrigues. \nI wish to highlight that the Rodrigues Regional Assembly has full responsibility of the \nportfolio of Environment by virtue of Section 26, Fourth Schedule of the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly Act 2001. Accordingly, implementation of policies and strategies fall under the \npurview of the Island Chief Executive.  \nMETRO EXPRESS LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT SYSTEM – PUBLIC SECURITY – \nMEASURES TAKEN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/55",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 55,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "B/55\nThe Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River  \n(Mr Jugurnauth)  \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Land Transport – \n \nWhether, in regard  to the Le Morne Brabant-La Gaulette  \nB9-B113 Junction, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to the  (a) number of accidents having occurred \nthereat over the past year and (b) whether consideration will \nbe given for the installation of traffic lights thereat?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": "NOT ANSWERED",
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-april-2026"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/56",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 56,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "B/56\nThe Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne \nLongue (Mr Caserne)  \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Land Transport – \n \nWhether, in regard to abandoned vehicles lying on public \nroads, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nNational Land Transport Authority, information as to whether \nconsideration will be given for the deregistration thereof after \na certain period post expiry of the annual motor vehicle \nlicence?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": "NOT ANSWERED",
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-april-2026",
        "tuesday-05-may-2026"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/57",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 57,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/57) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Metro Express Light Rail Transit \nSystem, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the measures being \nenvisaged/taken to enhance public security around the stations and onboard the wagons \nthereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nMAURITIUS POST LTD – POST OFFICES – PAYMENT SERVICES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/58",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 58,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/58) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in \nregard to services provided in post offices, including payment of bills and road tax, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Post Ltd., information as to the \naccepted modes of payment thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nTAXI OPERATORS’ WELFARE FUND – NUMBER OF MEMBERS – \nCONTRIBUTION COLLECTED \n\n138",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/59",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 59,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/59) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Taxi Operators Welfare Fund, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe current number of members thereof; \n(b) \nthe quantum of contributions collected from taxi operators since the inception \nthereof to date, indicating the total amount disbursed therefrom under each \nscheme and the corresponding number of beneficiaries, and \n(c) \nwhether a review regarding contribution thereto is being envisaged and, if so, \nindicate where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBROWN SEQUARD HOSPITAL – MORTUARY – UNCLAIMED CORPSES – \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/60",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 60,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/60) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Brown Sequard \nHospital, he will state the current number of unclaimed corpses in its mortuary, indicating \nsince when they have been lying there and the measures being envisaged to deal with this \nissue and whether his Ministry is in presence of requests from medical colleges to be handed \nover same for research purposes and, if so, where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGLOBAL UNCERTAINTIES – FOOD SUPPLY CHAIN DISRUPTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/61",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 61,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/61) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand Baie and Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to potential food shortages and high prices thereof, especially, in the current times of \nwar, global uncertainties and supply chain disruptions, he will state – \n(a) \nthe measures being envisaged to mitigate the consequences thereof, and \n(b) \nwhether lessons have been learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic episode for \nenhanced food security.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PNQ) \nELECTRONIC MONITORING BRACELETS – IMPLEMENTATION TIMEFRAME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/62",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 62,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/62) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nAttorney-General whether, in regard to the use of electronic monitoring bracelets, he will \nstate where matters stand as to the – \n(a) \nimplementation thereof, indicating the reasons – \n(i) \nwhy the relevant provisions for electronic monitoring have not yet been \nproclaimed/put into operation as at to date, and \n(ii) \nfor the absence of regulations defining the operational protocols and \nmonitoring procedures, and \n(b) \nproposed timeframe for the full implementation thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nPUBLIC HOSPITALS – CHILDREN UNDER CDU CARE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/63",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 63,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/63) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port-Louis Maritime & Port-Louis \nEast) asked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to \nchildren currently placed in public hospitals by the Child Development Unit, she will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to the number thereof who, to date, present no \nhealth issues, indicating – \n(a) \nthe public hospitals where they are currently placed;  \n(b) \nthe duration of stay; \n(c) \nsince when they are missing classes, and \n(d) \nwhether arrangements have been/are being made, in collaboration with the \nMinistry of Education and Human Resource, to ensure that they continue their \neducation while in hospital.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nDISTRICT COUNCIL PAMPLEMOUSSES – BUDGET 2025-2026 – ALLOCATED \nFUNDS & PROJECTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/64",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 64,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/64) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the funds allocated to the District \nCouncil of Pamplemousses during the last Budget exercise, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Council, information as to the – \n(a) \nquantum thereof requested by the District Council, indicating the – \n(i) \nreasons for the non-disbursement thereof; \n(ii) \nexpected date of disbursement thereof and if same will be disbursed by \nmid-April 2026, and \n(b) \nprojects which, as a result, are being kept in abeyance.",
      "answer": "Reply: I wish to inform the House that funds are allocated to local authorities, \nincluding the District Council of Pamplemousses, under Grant-in-Aid and Capital \nExpenditure provisions. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the hon. Member that pursuant \nto Section 85(2) of the Local Government Act 2011, as subsequently amended, the District \nCouncil of Pamplemousses submitted to my Ministry its Estimates for the Financial Year \n2025-26 together with indicative estimates for 2026-27 and 2027-28, amounting to \nRs614,527,372, as approved by the Council at its sitting held on 23 April 2025. \nThe different cost components of the above amount comprise, inter alia –  \n \nstaff costs; \n \nutilities; \n \nhired and contracted services, and \n \nmaintenance and operational expenses. \nThe hon. Member may wish to note that the estimates were prepared using the 2024-25 \nbudget allocation as baseline, while taking into account several factors, including the increase \nin cost of goods and services, climate-related challenges, and the implementation of Central \nGovernment policy measures. \nFollowing consultations between my Ministry and the Ministry of Finance, the \nCouncil’s budget for the Financial Year 2025-26 was approved on 31 October 2025 for an \namount of Rs401,552,000, comprising – \n \nGrant-in-Aid: Rs353,000,000, and  \n \nInternally generated revenue: Rs48,452,000. \nThe hon. Member may wish to note that the total amount requested could not be \napproved mainly due to the financial constraints currently affecting the local government \nsector, which inherited accumulated deficits estimated at around Rs1.2 billion, resulting from \nprevious budgetary reductions imposed on local authorities. \nConsequently, the District Council has been required to prioritise essential and \nunavoidable expenditures, namely – \n \nsettlement of pending liabilities; \n \nstaff costs; \n \npayment of utilities, and \n \ncontractual obligations. \nGrant-in-Aid is not disbursed in a single lump sum, but is released in monthly \ninstalments, based on the cash-flow requirements and progress of expenditure of the Council, \nin consultation with the Ministry of Finance. \nAccordingly, disbursements are being effected on a regular basis, and the process will \ncontinue during the financial year including the period up to mid-April 2026, subject to the \nCouncil’s financial requirements and approved budgetary provisions. \nA mid-term review is usually carried out to revisit the Grant-in-Aid provided to all \nLocal Authorities. The review has revealed that the Local Authorities are facing a deficit of \nRs1.127 billion. A request has been made to the Ministry of Finance on 10 February 2026 for \nthe release of additional fund. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that certain capital projects \ninitiated in previous years remain outstanding, including –  \n \nConstruction of a Market at Fond du Sac (land not yet vested); \n \nConstruction of an Incinerator at Long Mountain (land not yet vested), and \n \nConstruction of a Multipurpose Complex at Petite Julie (request for increase in \nproject value on two occasions). \nOut of the 32 projects currently being implemented by the Ministry of National \nInfrastructure (National Development Unit), 9 have been completed, 14 are in progress, and \nworks orders are to be issued for 6 projects. Funding is not presently available for 2 projects; \nhowever, these will be considered in the next financial year. In addition, a consultant has \nbeen appointed for the design of the outfall works. \nMy Ministry is closely monitoring these projects in collaboration with the District \nCouncil so as to ensure their progressive implementation and completion, in line with \nGovernment’s development priorities. \nNotwithstanding the financial constraints, Government has continued to support \ncommunity development within the District Council area through funding allocated under \nSmall Community Projects, Small Development Projects (Indian Grant Assistance), Other \nInfrastructure and Amenities and Major Stand-Alone Projects. \nDisbursement of funds for these projects is being effected as and when required, in \naccordance with established financial procedures. \nA list of projects for which financial clearance has been conveyed for the Financial \nYear 2025-2026, together with projects proposed under the Estimates 2026-2027 is being \nplaced in the Library of the National Assembly. \nANJALAY COOPEN STADIUM – OPERATIONALITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/65",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 65,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "B/65\nThe Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness – \n \nWhether, in regard to the healthcare services, he will state the \nstrategies and concrete measures being implemented by his \nMinistry, in collaboration with the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly, to ensure parity in the outcomes and access thereto \nin Rodrigues Island and mainland Mauritius?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/66",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 66,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/66) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port-Louis Maritime & Port-Louis \nEast) asked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Anjalay Coopen \nStadium, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Sports Council, \ninformation as to the date of coming into full operation thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nEBÈNE CYCLING LANE – COST & NEEDS ANALYSIS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/67",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 67,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/67) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the cycling lane at Ebène, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe project cost thereof;  \n(b) \nwhether any survey was conducted prior to the implementation thereof, and \n(c) \n the average number of cyclists using same on a daily basis.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nNATIONAL PENSIONS FUND – BALANCE – RETURN ON INVESTMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/68",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 68,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/68) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port-Louis Maritime & Port Louis \nEast) asked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \nwhether, in regard to the National Pensions Fund, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to the – \n(a) \nbalance currently standing to the credit thereof, and  \n(b) \nreturn on investment thereof in the last financial year.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBRITANNIA POST OFFICE – RENOVATION – REOPENING DATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/69",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 69,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/69) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in \nregard to the proposed renovation of the Britannia Post office, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Mauritius Post Ltd., information as to the duration thereof and \nexpected date of reopening thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMONT BLANC WATER TREATMENT PLANT – EXCESS WATER DEMAND – \nSITE VISIT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/70",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 70,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/70) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the Mont Blanc Water \nTreatment Plant, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water \nAuthority, information as to whether – \n(a) \nin case of excess water demand from the villages of Chemin Grenier, Surinam, \nRiambel, Chamouny, Rivière des Galets, Bel Ombre and Baie du Cap over supply \nfrom the said water plant, the alternatives presently available to satisfy same, and  \n(b) \nconsideration will be given for the carrying out of a site visit thereat with the \nrelevant authorities to address the matter.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPUBLIC BUS TRANSPORT – CURRENT STATE ASSESSMENT – \nCORRECTIVE MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/71",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 71,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/71) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to public bus transport, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information as \nto whether an assessment of the current state thereof has been carried out with a view to \naddressing the issues being faced by commuters, especially during peak hours and, if so, \nindicate the corrective measures being envisaged in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nREGISTERED FISHERMEN – COMPENSATION & LUMP SUM – DEATH GRANT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/72",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 72,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/72) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to the \nregistered fishers in mainland Mauritius and Rodrigues Island, respectively, he will state, for \nthe past five years, the number – \n(a) \nthereof having benefitted from the compensation and lump sum paid as artisanal \nor net fishers on surrendering their fisher’s card and any outstanding cases \nthereof;  \n(b) \nof heirs having benefitted in the case of the sudden death of the fisher, and  \n(c) \nof beneficiaries of death grant provided to families of fishers lost at sea and any \noutstanding cases thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: Registered fishermen of Rodrigues fall under the purview of the Rodrigues \nRegional Assembly (RRA). \nAs regards part (a) of the question, 362 artisanal fishermen and 18 net fishermen of \nmainland Mauritius have been paid compensation totalling Rs23,320,000 and Rs2.6 million, \nrespectively. \nWith regard to Rodrigues, ten applications for compensation and lump sum have been \nreceived from registered artisanal fishermen and are being processed. One application is \nbeing kept in abeyance, pending submission of the required documents. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, a total amount of Rs600,000 has been paid to the \nheirs of three fishermen for mainland Mauritius. \nThere is no outstanding case regarding such compensation for sudden death for \nMauritius. \nAs for Rodrigues, there are nine outstanding cases following the sudden death of a \nfisher. These cases have been transmitted to the Legal Adviser of the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly for advice on the quantum to be paid per heir. \nConcerning part (c) of the question, a total amount of Rs1.1 million has been paid to the \nheirs of four fishers of mainland Mauritius, in connection with accidental death and \ndisappearance at sea, and a sum of Rs400,000 has been paid to the heirs of two Rodriguan \nfishermen lost at sea. \nFÉDÉRATION MAURICIENNE DE JUDO – CLUBS SEEKING AFFILIATION – \nUPDATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/73",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 73,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/73) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Fédération Mauricienne de Judo, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to where matters stand regarding \nthe 18 clubs seeking affiliation thereto, indicating – \n(a) \nthe ruling of the Sports Arbitration Tribunal in relation thereto, and  \n(b) \nwhether any decision has been taken pertaining to the recognition thereof and, if \nnot, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFISHERMAN REGISTRATION CARD – CERTIFICATE OF CHARACTER \n– ELIGIBILITY \n\n145",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/74",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 74,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/74) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether in \nregard to the Fisherman Registration Card, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to whether it is a prerequisite for the applicants for the issue thereof to hold a \nclean Certificate of Character for eligibility thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPRIMARY & SECONDARY SCHOOLS – MAINTENANCE & UPGRADING – \nCOSTS INCURRED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/75",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 75,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "B/75\nThe Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne \nLongue (Mr Caserne)  \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness – \n \nWhether, in regard to rats infestation in public places, he will \nstate the urgent additional measures being envisaged/taken \nto address same, especially, due to the leptospirosis virus, \nindicating if the services of private entities are being \nenvisaged? \n \n \n \nBibi Safeena Lotun, C.S.K. (Mrs)                                          \n   Clerk of the National Assembly \n \nParliament House \nPort Louis  \n \n13 March 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                     PAGE 25 of 26 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org \n \nMAURITIUS NATIONAL ASSEMBLY \nQuestions of which notice has been given \nNot Requiring an Oral Answer \nSitting of Tuesday 17 March 2026 \n \n \nQuestions addressed to Honourable Ministers, other than to   \nDr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs \nand External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for \nRodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/1",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 1,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. A/1) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the maintenance \nand upgrading of the infrastructure of public primary and secondary schools across Mauritius, \nhe will state – \n(a)  the annual budget allocated therefor;  \n(b)  the costs of addressing urgent repairs required thereat to ensure health and safety \nrequirements of both children and staff, and  \n(c)  whether his Ministry will ensure that the most urgent infrastructural works are \nundertaken immediately to protect both children and staff.",
      "answer": "Reply: As regards part (a) of the question, the annual budget allocated to maintenance \nand upgrading works for the Financial Year 2025/26 is Rs50 million and Rs147.5 million \nrespectively.  \nAs regards part (b) of the question, urgent repairs required to ensure that health and \nsafety standards are maintained for both students and staff, an amount of approximately \nRs115.8 million (Rs22.1 million for maintenance works and Rs93.7 million for upgrading \nworks) has already been spent in the current Financial Year.  \nAs regards part (c) of the question, I wish to assure the hon. Member that my Ministry \nis committed to improve the condition of school infrastructure through regular inspections, \nreports from school, Zonal Directorates, Occupational Safety and Health Unit and technical \nassessments carried out by the relevant stakeholders. The most urgent infrastructural works \nare prioritised and implemented in a phased manner.  \nIt is to be noted that the implementation of works rests on availability of funds, \noutcome of procurement exercises and/or appointment of Contractor under the Framework \nAgreement of the MNI. \nSMALL FARMERS WELFARE FUND – VETERINARY OFFICERS – \nRECRUITMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-31-march-2026",
        "tuesday-07-april-2026"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "A/2",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 2,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. A/2) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the number of veterinary officers required to provide adequate services to animal \nrearers registered at the Small Farmers Welfare Fund, he will, for the benefit of the house, \nobtain information as to whether measures are being envisaged to recruit qualified veterinary \nprofessionals from Southern African Development Community countries.",
      "answer": "Reply: According to records available from the Small Farmers Welfare Fund, there are \ncurrently 921 registered breeders who are serviced by 19 veterinary officers of the Division \nof Veterinary Services (DVS) of my Ministry. With regard to livestock breeders, the free \nveterinary services include, inter-alia, treatment to animals, artificial insemination, \nvaccination and active surveillance in respect of diseases. Also, on call services are provided \nafter office hours and during public holidays and weekends. \nIn January 2024, owing to a shortage of veterinary officers at the DVS, the previous \nGovernment approved the recruitment of veterinary officer from Southern African \nDevelopment Community (SADC) Member Countries on a contract basis for a period of one \nyear, renewable on the same terms and conditions. It was also agreed that the recruitment \nwould be extended to countries other than SADC countries. The Public Service Commission \n(PSC) had accordingly delegated the responsible officer of this Ministry the power to recruit \nveterinary officers from SADC Countries. However, the exercise was unsuccessful.  \nSubsequently, on 20 February 2025, 10 vacancies for the post of veterinary officer were \nreported to PSC, out of which, only one vacancy was filled on 15 December 2025. A \nrecommendation has been made to the PSC on 13 January 2026 to re-advertise the post for \nthe filling of nine permanent vacancies locally. Should not all vacancies be filled, my \nMinistry may explore the possibility of recruiting from SADC Member countries anew.   \n \nFOUNDATION PROGRAMME IN LITERACY, NUMERACY AND SKILLS – \nIMPLEMENTATION & GOVERNANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-april-2026"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "A/3",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 3,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource – With regard to the implementation and overall governance of the Foundation Programme in Literacy, Numeracy and Skills, he will state  (a) the established process and criteria used for the appointment of key coordinating positions within the programme (b) composition, mandate and responsibilities of the Technical Committee overseeing same (c) the number of official meetings held to date in relation thereto and (d) whether members serving on the Technical Committee receive any remuneration or allowances in connection with their responsibilities?",
      "question": "(No. A/3) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource with regard to the implementation and \noverall governance of the Foundation Programme in Literacy, Numeracy and Skills, he will \nstate – \n(a)  the established process and criteria used for the appointment of key coordinating \npositions within the programme;  \n(b)  composition, mandate and responsibilities of the Technical Committee overseeing \nsame;  \n(c)  the number of official meetings held to date in relation thereto, and  \n(d)  whether members serving on the Technical Committee receive any remuneration \nor allowances in connection with their responsibilities.",
      "answer": "Reply: As regards part (a) of the question, I am informed that the appointment of key \ncoordinating positions within the FPLNS is being undertaken in accordance with established \nprocedures. This particular exercise requires the prior clearance of the Ministry of Public \nService and Administrative Reforms and delegation of powers from the Public Service \nCommission. Final clearances are being awaited. \nOn 4 December 2025, my Ministry obtained the clearance of the Ministry of Public \nService and Administrative Reforms to proceed with a selection exercise to enlist the services \nof six Coordinators for the FPLNS for an initial period of two years against payment of a \nmonthly allowance of Rs12,000, subject to the necessary clearances being obtained. Eligible \ncandidates were to be drawn from officers in the grades of Quality Assurance Officer/Senior \nQuality Assurance Officer, Senior Educator (Secondary) and Educator (Secondary), \nreckoning at least 15 years’ service. \nOn 19 December 2025, the Public Service Commission delegated its powers to my \nMinistry to enlist the services of six Coordinators as per the aforesaid criteria.  \nThe position of Coordinator, FPLNS was advertised on 6 January 2026 among the \nconcerned officers, and the closing date for submission of applications was set for 26 January \n2026.  \nHowever, on 16 January 2026, the Government Services Employees Association \n(GSEA) made a representation requesting that teaching personnel in the Pre-Vocational \nSector also be considered for the position of Coordinator for the FPLNS. \nThis Ministry agreed to the request of the GSEA and consequently, on 5 March 2026, \nthe Public Service Commission was informed accordingly. In the same context, establishment \nclearance from the Ministry of Public Service and Administrative Reforms has been sought \nanew on 5 March 2026. Once the clearance of that Ministry is obtained, the position of \nCoordinator FPLNS will be advertised again.  \nIn view of the tight deadline for the preparation and implementation of the programme \nas from January 2025, Mr Vijay Sookharee, Quality Assurance Officer/Senior Quality \nAssurance Officer, was assigned the task of coordinating the work of the Technical Team set \nup, ensuring the preparation of the curriculum and overseeing the organisation of training \nworkshops for Educators, Senior Educators and Rectors.  \nApproval has been obtained from the Ministry of Public Service and Administrative \nReforms for the payment of a monthly ad hoc allowance of Rs14,150 to Mr Vijay Sookharee \nfor performing the aforesaid tasks. The allowance is payable with effect from January 2025 \nand will remain in force until the recruitment of a Project Manager for the Foundation \nProgramme in Literacy, Numeracy and Skills. \nMy Ministry is presently in the process of drafting of the Scheme of Service for the \npost of Project Manager. Once the Scheme of Service is finalised and approved by the \nrelevant authorities, the necessary steps will be taken for the recruitment to the post.  \nAs for part (b) of the question, I am informed that the Technical Committee set up for \noverseeing the design and implementation of the FPLNS was composed of representatives \nfrom key institutions and stakeholders in the Education sector, namely – \n Mr Nemorin, Chairperson (former Manager, National Social Inclusion \nFoundation (NSIF))  \n Mr V. Sookharee, Quality Assurance Officer/Senior Quality Assurance Officer \nof the Ministry who is also coordinating the implementation of FPLNS;  \n Representatives of my Ministry from different sections;  \n Dr. Ajay Ramful Head of Curriculum of the Mauritius Institute of Education;  \n Dr. Shalena Fokeera Wahedally, Principal Research and Development Officer, \nof the Mauritius Examinations Syndicate;  \n Dr. D. Patpur; representative of the Private Secondary Education Authority;  \n Mr B. Pitchen representative of the Service Diocésain de l’Education \nCatholique (SeDEC);   \n Mrs Claire Ayoung-Herry representative of Loreto Institute;   \n Dr. S. Ramful representative of the Mahatma Gandhi Institute;  \n Mr P. Sawon representative of the Mauritius Institute of Training and \nDevelopment, and  \n Mr Ramchurrun representative of the Mauritius Qualifications Authority.  \nThe Technical Committee was entrusted with providing technical expertise and \nguidance for the development and implementation of the FPLNS Programme, developing \nguidelines and procedures for the programme, advising decision-makers on technical matters, \nreviewing and evaluating technical proposals, projects or policies related to the programme; \nensuring alignment with best practices and professional standards; gathering relevant \ntechnical data to support decision-making; and monitoring the implementation of technical \nguidelines. \nWith regard to parts (c) and (d) of the question, I am further informed that the \nTechnical Committee held 20 meetings with different stakeholders and that members of the \nCommittee have not been remunerated for their services.",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-05-may-2026"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "A/4",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-17-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-17",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 4,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "A/4\nThe Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka \n(Dr Ms Thannoo)  \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Housing and Lands – \n \nWhether, in regard to houses severely endangered by \nlandslides and soil erosion, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the National Housing Development \nCorporation Ltd., information as to whether consideration will \nbe given for the development of  a single and unitary policy of  \nre-housing households endangered by landslides and erosion \nbased on a common, accessible and feasible strategy such as \nensuring access to one home per household? \n \n \n \n \nBibi Safeena Lotun, C.S.K. (Mrs)                                          \n Clerk of the National Assembly \n \n \n \nParliament House \nPort Louis  \n \n13 March 2026",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/76",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 76,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/76) Mr R. Jhummun (The Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the recent seizures of assets by the Financial Crimes Commission, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to the respective responsibilities of the Financial \nIntelligence Unit and the Mauritius Revenue Authority in the identification, analysis and \nreporting of suspicious financial activities, including cases of unexplained wealth in relation \nthereto.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister:  Madam Speaker, Sections 56 and 113 of the Financial Crimes \nCommission Act provide that where in the discharge of their functions, the Financial \nIntelligence Unit (FIU) and the Mauritius Revenue Authority (MRA), amongst others, have \nreasonable grounds to suspect an illicit source of income, they shall refer the matter for \ninvestigation to the Financial Crimes Commission (FCC), which has been empowered to \nseize assets, pursuant to section 61 of the Financial Crimes Commission Act. \nMadam Speaker, the FIU is responsible for receiving, analysing, and disseminating \nfinancial intelligence.  It analyses Suspicious Transaction Reports received from regulated \nfinancial institutions and, where indicators of financial crimes are identified, refers cases \nalong with supporting evidence, that is, the intelligence reports, to the FCC for investigation \nand enforcement. \nMadam Speaker, in so far as the MRA is concerned, it is responsible for the \nadministration and enforcement of revenue laws, including the collection of taxes, duties, \ncontributions and levies.  MRA plays a key role in combating tax evasion and related \nfinancial offences. \nIn cases where there are reasonable grounds again to suspect the commission of a \nmoney laundering offence or the existence of unexplained wealth, the MRA refers such \nmatters to the FCC for enquiry, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Income Tax \nAct and the Financial Crimes Commission Act. \nMadam Speaker, it is opportune to highlight that in accordance with Section 132 of the \nFinancial Crimes Commission Act, there is provision for the setting up of a National \nCoordination Committee under the chair of the Director-General of the Financial Crimes \nCommission for combating financial crimes which consists among others, the Director of the \nFinancial Intelligence Unit and the Director-General of the Mauritius Revenue Authority. \nMadam Speaker, in view of the fact that these institutions operate in a totally \nindependent manner, so, it would not be in order to provide the information requested by the \nhon. Member. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. \nYes! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, may I ask the hon. Prime Minister, there have been \nmany, many seizures in the last few months, which is a very good thing, but it highlights a \nmajor problem. There are tens of millions of assets being bought in car dealerships by \npersons who are being prosecuted at the moment for money laundering. \nThe question is whether the hon. Prime Minister has received information for the need \nto severely strengthen and toughen KYC legislations and requirements on car dealers whether \nbrand-new cars or second-hand cars because it is not normal that there are – if you look at \nyesterday’s seizures, nearly Rs100 million of cars… \nMadam Speaker: Just question! \nMr A. Duval: … bought at one dealer whether he finds it normal and whether he does \nnot find the need now to come with severe and stronger legislations? \nMadam Speaker: Be short and direct, please!  \nYes! \nThe Prime Minister: No, I do not find it normal and we hope that we will catch all \nthese people but the law is very, very strong already on this. It is very pertinent to look at the \nlaw and to see what are the penalties that are being given. So, there is no need to again go and \nconsolidate a law that is already very severe. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, if I may ask a second question? May I ask the hon. \nPrime Minister, if the law is sufficiently strong at the moment, why is it then that persons \nwho were involved in drug trafficking – suspected – are allowed to go and to buy a car for \nRs20 million and goes 3 or 4 cars at one dealer? How is the law now working in that sense? \nMay hon. Prime Minister say whether any prosecutions have been laid against any of those \npersons who have facilitated those transactions of money-laundering by selling such high \nvalue assets to people who are clearly using tainted proceeds? \nThe Prime Minister: That is clear as you said. They are in possession of the cars. \nThere is no evidence that they have actually bought the cars. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Alright, hon. Jhummun, you did not have anything else? Hon. \nBeejan! \nSCEs, PS, DPS, AS – POSTING & RESHUFFLING – POLICY, PROTOCOL & \nCRITERIA",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/77",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 77,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/77) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External   Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Senior Chief \nExecutives, Permanent Secretaries, Deputy Permanent Secretaries and Assistant Permanent \nSecretaries, he will state the policy, protocol or criteria governing the posting and reshuffling \nthereof, indicating the – \n(a) \nduration of a posting in a given institution/department or Ministry, and \n(b) \nwhether there are currently instances of officers remaining posted in any one \nposting for more than five years and, if so, table the list thereof, indicating the \nduration in each case.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, the grades of Senior Chief Executive, \nPermanent Secretary, Deputy Permanent Secretary and Assistant Secretary (formerly known \nas Assistant Permanent Secretary) form part of the Administrative Cadre of the public \nservice. The Administrative Cadre is involved in the formulation, coordination and \nimplementation of Government policies, goals and objectives and providing administrative \nsupport to the machinery of Government.   \nThe officers of the Administrative Cadre are also called upon to give advice and \nsupport to Ministers on the current Government business including their parliamentary duties, \ndrafting and administration of legislation, initiating and implementing programmes which \naim at enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of any department of Government where \nthey are posted. \nMadam Speaker, pursuant to Section 89(4) of the Constitution, Supervising Officers \nincluding Senior Chief Executives and Permanent Secretaries, amongst others, are appointed \nby the Public Service Commission subject to the concurrence of the Prime Minister.  \nAs regard, Deputy Permanent Secretaries and Assistant Secretaries, they are appointed \nby the Public Service Commission and their postings fall within the ambit of the \nresponsibilities of the Secretary to Cabinet and Head of the Civil Service.   \nWhile posting these officers, the Secretary to Cabinet and Head of the Civil Service \nensures that they get the opportunity to acquire appropriate experience and exposure in the \nmanagement of the whole administrative machinery of government. However, the duration of \ntheir posting is subject to the exigencies of the service. \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, Madam Speaker, I am tabling the list of officers. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nYes, Dr. hon. Aumeer! \nPOLICE OFFICERS – ASSAULTS & MOLESTATION – REPORTED CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/78",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 78,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/78) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port-Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to assaults on and molesting of Police Officers on duty, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the number of reported \ncases thereof over the past two years, indicating the – \n(a) \nnumber of arrests effected in connection therewith as at to date, indicating the \nnumber of convictions secured, if any, and \n(b) \nmeasures taken to prevent occurrences thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I wish to state very clearly that I strongly \ncondemn any acts of assault, intimidation or molestation against Police Officers and other \npublic officers who are carrying out their duties. Government will not condone any such \nbehaviour and will continue to ensure that firm action is taken against all such offenders. \nThese men and women are in the front line, ensuring public security.  Any violence \nagainst them is not only an attack on individuals, but it is also an attack on the very fabric of \nour society. \nIn fact, under Section 159 of the Criminal Code the offence of “Assault upon agent of \ncivil or military authorities”, including Police Officers, acting in the discharge of their duties, \nis liable to a fine not exceeding Rs25,000 and imprisonment for a term not exceeding two \nyears. Under the Public Officers’ Protection Act, any person who resists, opposes, molests or \nobstructs a public officer in the performance of his duty, commits an offence and is liable, \nupon conviction, to a fine not exceeding Rs200,000 and imprisonment for a term not \nexceeding five years.  \nAs regards part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that \nfor the period 01 January 2024 to 19 March 2026, a total of 247 persons have been arrested \nfor the offence of “Assault upon agent of civil or military authorities”. Out of these, 27 \npersons have been convicted as at date. With regard to cases of molesting Police Officers, for \nthe same period, I am informed that 144 persons have been charged, out of whom, 12 have \nbeen convicted as at date. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed that several measures to address and \nprevent assaults on and molesting of Police Officers in the discharge of their duties have been \nput in place by the Police and they are as follows – \n(i) \nPolice Officers are provided with continuous training in safety and self-defence, \nincluding the use of appropriate restraint techniques and equipment, so as to \nenable them to respond effectively to potentially violent situations while \nminimising risks to themselves and to the public; \n(ii) \nPolice interventions, particularly in identified hot spots and during large public \ngatherings, are carried out with the support of specialised units, including the \nEmergency Response Service and the Divisional Support Unit, to ensure adequate \nbackup and rapid response capability; \n(iii) the Police are also making enhanced use of technology, including the Safe City \ncamera system, for a more effective operation planning and action; \n(iv) community sensitisation initiatives are conducted through the Crime Prevention \nUnit and Community Policing programmes to raise awareness on the role of the \nPolice but more importantly, on the legal consequences of assaulting or \nobstructing Police Officers. \nMadam Speaker, as I have already informed the House, Police will use body-worn \ncameras by the end of March and will introduce the use of tasers.  These measures will \ncontribute to deter acts of aggression against Police Officers. \nMadam Speaker, I have to make it very clear that we cannot and will not tolerate any \nassault on any Police Officer. People must learn to respect the uniform. In view of this, my \nGovernment intends to review the penalties, higher in the Police and Criminal Justice Bill \nwhich we will be bringing to Parliament shortly. \nMs Anquetil: Bravo, PM! \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Dr. Aumeer? \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. Thank you, Madam Speaker. In an \nattempt for severe deterrent action, when we look at the number of cases – 247 and 144, will \nthe hon. Prime Minister consider in the setup of the Police Criminal Bill which is coming \nfurther, that the harshest deterrent factor would be not to allow bail to any of those causing \nphysical abuse or molesting, as evidenced in Safe City cameras or body-worn cameras, which \nwill come in effect at the end of March? These people should not have bail. They should not \nbe on our streets. \n The Prime Minister: Unfortunately, I cannot say that because it will depend on the \ncourt. The court will look at the case individually, each case on its own merit and then decide \nwhether bail should be given or not. \nMadam Speaker: Séparation des pouvoirs. Yes, Mr Beechook? \nMr Beechook: Merci, Madame la présidente. Considering the prominence of social \nmedia, will the hon. Prime Minister also consider to tighten the rules and also punish those \nwho record and broadcast the videos of verbal and physical aggression towards our Police \nOfficers, which have unfortunately, contributed to trivialise violence against our Police \nOfficers? \nThe Prime Minister: I totally agree with the hon. Member and we are, in fact, in the \nprocess of having a Government-to-Government Agreement with the Government of India, in \nfact, to look at all these things that are happening here. We have recently seen cases and we \nwill tighten the law on this. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, yes, hon. A. Duval. \nMr A. Duval: May I ask the hon. Prime Minister, in fact, I am reiterating… \nMadam Speaker: You have asked before, yes. \nMr A. Duval: …a question that whether he will consider to have specialised units like \nthe SSU etc., in present with normal Police Officers who conduct road blocks, stopping of \nvehicles and contraventions etc., because we have seen – yesterday I think or the day before – \nthere was an incident in Port Louis where a Police Officer was taken to task by a group of \npersons after having booked someone? So, whether he will consider giving instructions to the \nCommissioner of Police… \nMadam Speaker: Do not repeat! Do not repeat! Yes? \nMr A. Duval: …so that Police Officers conducting road blocks have enough support \nwith those specialised units? \nMadam Speaker: Specialised. \nThe Prime Minister: I will pass on the information to the Commissioner of Police. I \ncannot direct him how to operate his Police Force but I can give him that information. \nMadam Speaker: Good! Next question, Mr Beechook. Yes! \nMAURITIAN ECONOMY – MOODY’S RATING – COMPREHENSIVE IMPACT \nASSESSMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/79",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 79,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/79) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Mauritian \neconomy, he will state whether a comprehensive impact assessment thereon has been carried \nout should Moody’s downgrade the sovereign credit rating thereof to junk status for some \nreasons or the other and, if so, give details thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, as I have stated on several occasions, the \neconomic mismanagement and irresponsible fiscal stewardship of the previous Government \nhave driven our sovereign credit rating by Moody’s perilously close to junk status.  \nThe House will recall that, in June 2012, when we were in office, Moody’s upgraded \nour credit rating from Baa2 to Baa1 with a stable outlook. I should doubt that before the 2014 \nelection, because we had managed the economy with prudence, public debt was 59.5% of \nGDP, in other words, lower than 60%, as it is in the European Union. This rating remained \nunchanged until April 2020, when the deterioration in macroeconomic management by the \nprevious Government, began to raise serious concerns.  \nThere was a marked departure from prudent fiscal management that was eroding \nconfidence in the sustainability of our public finances.  Consequently, Mauritius was \ndowngraded by Moody’s, not on one occasion, not on two occasions but on four occasions – \n(a) \nin April 2020, the outlook was changed from positive to negative; \n(b) \nin March 2021, the rating was downgraded from Baa1 to Baa2 with a negative \noutlook; \n(c) \nin July 2022, the rating was further downgraded to Baa3 with stable outlook, and \n(d) \nfinally in January 2025, the outlook changed from stable to negative, that is, the \nlowest investment grade rating. \nMadam Speaker, simply on the quantitative aspects of the scorecard of Moody’s, we \nshould have been downgraded to the junk status. Against this backdrop, I sent a high-level \ndelegation to London to discuss with the top management of Moody’s to explain our \neconomic and fiscal consolidation plan and our commitments for structural reforms. That \nincluded the pension reform which had become unsustainable as the IMF and the World Bank \nhad been saying since the previous Government was in office but they turned a blind eye, of \ncourse to that. We avoided the downgrade with our intervention and bold fiscal consolidation \nmeasures were implemented.  \nMadam Speaker, the consequences of a downgrade to junk status would have had \nincalculable and far-reaching effects such as – \n(a) \nlower investor confidence could slow down the FDI inflows or trigger capital \noutflows as foreign investors try to reduce their risk exposure; \n(b) \nreduced investor confidence and capital outflows would lead to a depreciation of \nthe rupee, which would in turn, increase import costs and inflationary pressures. \nThat is why I am surprised when the Leader of the Opposition says what he says. \nHe does not seem to realise what they have done; the economic crime they have \ncommitted against this country; \n(c) \nreduced investments, higher costs and depreciation of the rupee would lead to \nlower economic growth; \n(d) \na downgrading of the credit rating of our commercial banks would reflect the \nsovereign credit rating which will make our international business difficult and \nmore costly; \n(e) \nin view of the increased risk perception, Government, banks and businesses in \nMauritius would inevitably face higher interest rates and new debt borrowing will \nbecome even more expensive, if you get the loan. \nMadam Speaker, let me remind the House that these consequences would have had \nripple effects on the population at large. A large proportion of the non-resident deposits in the \nbanking system are very sensitive to the investment grade. A downgrade could trigger a \nsignificant capital outflow which will destabilise the forex market, that remains under \npressure in spite of the improvement of our external balance and the regular interventions of \nthe Bank of Mauritius. This would put additional pressure on the value of the rupee, which \nwould in turn increase prices significantly, affecting the purchasing power and living \nstandard of the population. \nThe Macroeconomic Coordination Committee, which comprises representatives of the \nPrime Minister’s Office, the Ministry of Finance, the Bank of Mauritius, Statistics Mauritius \nand the Economic Development Board, is closely monitoring developments related to our \nsovereign credit rating. The Committee has also undertaken various scenario analysis and \nstress testing to assess potential risks and policy responses. \nMauritius remains under the close scrutiny of Moody’s. The Government is doing \neverything within its powers to prevent a further downgrade to junk status.  \nMadam Speaker, allow me to make a point regarding Standard and Poor’s (S&P), \nwhich is another grading agency. In February 2023, the previous Minister of Finance had \nrequested the Bank of Mauritius to enter directly into a contract with S&P to carry out a \nsecond sovereign credit rating for Mauritius.  The file was being handled by the very special \nadviser at the level of the Bank of Mauritius.  There are no official records at the Ministry of \nFinance for such a request. \nAs a matter of principle, Madam Speaker, the sovereign credit rating is the \nresponsibility of Government through the Ministry of Finance. The contract was not renewed \nin March of this year due to the fact that there are no immediate plans for the Government to \ntap the international debt markets. You did two sovereign credit ratings for tapping the \ninternational debt markets. \nThe House may wish to note that S&P published its first sovereign credit rating for \nMauritius on 21 July 2023, and the most recent one was published on 27 October 2025 with a \nrating of BBB negative, stable outlook. The BBB negative rating is the lowest rating at \ninvestment grade. This was not as some people are trying say, especially from the MSM. We \nknow who they are. They are trying to say it is a pre-emptive strike to avoid scrutiny, \ncontrary to the false narrative that is being peddled. It is not at all the case, as I have \nexplained, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker, I must say something else. We have embarked on a difficult, yet \nnecessary, fiscal consolidation with last year’s budget, strengthened governance of key \ninstitutions and upgraded our data dissemination standards to the IMF’s SDDS Plus. We are \nthe first country in Africa to attain that level.  \nThe IMF has highlighted in its communiqué, and let me quote, Madam Speaker – \n“By adhering to the SDDS Plus, Mauritius meets the most rigorous standards for the \ndissemination of essential macroeconomic and [fiscal] data on the state of the economy \nand its financial linkages, as established in the IMF’s Data Standards Initiatives. This \nachievement underscores the country’s [that is, Mauritius] strong commitment to data \ntransparency vis-à-vis the public, markets, and the international community.” \nIn addition, the Government has sought and received technical assistance, earlier this \nyear, from the IMF on fiscal responsibility frameworks. All these actions signal the \nGovernment’s strong commitment to anchoring fiscal discipline in cementing the reputation \nof Mauritius as a credible investment grade jurisdiction for international visitors. \nMadam Speaker, to end, I should also add that given the situation as it is, we will \ncontinue to monitor and implement our fiscal consolidation programme to gradually bring \ndown the budget deficit and public debt to sustainable levels. \nWe need to rebuild the economy first in order to firmly place it on a higher growth path \nwhile ensuring that the benefits are shared across the whole of the population. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Yes, you are alright?  \nNow, hon. Lobine! \nMASCARENE PLATEAU REGION – EXTENDED CONTINENTAL SHELF – \nJOINT MANAGEMENT AREA",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/80",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 80,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/80) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Extended \nContinental Shelf in the Mascarene Plateau Region, he will state whether, during the recent \nState Visit of His Excellency the President of the Republic of Seychelles to Mauritius – \n(a) \nthe progress of the Joint Management Area (JMA) framework was discussed;  \n(b) \nnew agreements or Memoranda of Understanding were signed to further explore \nand exploit the natural resources within the JMA, and  \n(c) \nthe exploration for potential petroleum and the conduct of seismic surveys were \ndiscussed.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, let me first inform the House that after the 2010 \nGeneral Elections, I was made aware of a dispute between Mauritius and Seychelles over \n396,000 square kilometres of Extended Continental Shelf in the Mascarene Plateau Region. \nThe Governments of Mauritius and Seychelles were in disagreement, and therefore, we were \ngoing to the United Nations for the resolution of the dispute. \nI then decided to call the then President of Seychelles, Mr James Michel, and impressed \nupon him that Mauritius and Seychelles being two neighbouring and friendly countries \nshould make an effort to avoid having recourse to the United Nations for the resolution of the \ndispute which could have taken about ten years to be resolved. \nThe then President of Seychelles immediately agreed with me, and he decided that we \ncan make a joint submission, that is, by both Mauritius and Seychelles, to the United Nations \nCommission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf.  I must say, Madam Speaker, this \ninitiative was highly commended by the then Secretary-General of the United Nations. In \nfact, I think it was unique that two countries decided not to go to the United Nations to \nresolve the dispute, but to come to an agreement between ourselves. \nIn March 2011, the United Nations Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf \nconferred upon both Mauritius and Seychelles joint jurisdiction over an area of 396,000 \nsquare kilometres of Extended Continental Shelf in the Mascarene Plateau Region.  The area \nis now referred to as the Joint Management Area. \nIn March 2012, Mauritius and Seychelles signed a treaty to jointly manage the Joint \nManagement Area. They also agreed to exercise sovereign rights jointly for the purpose of \nexploring the Joint Management Area and exploiting its natural resources. \nThe joint management of Mauritius and Seychelles of the Extended Continental Shelf \nremains a shining example of constructive international cooperation. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, the progress of the Joint \nManagement Area was indeed addressed during the recent State Visit of His Excellency Dr. \nPatrick Herminie, President of the Republic of Seychelles to Mauritius. Both Mauritius and \nSeychelles reiterated their commitment to the sustainable development and sound governance \nof the Joint Management Area, in line with the principles of shared stewardship and mutual \nbenefit. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, during the recent State visit of the President of \nSeychelles, we both made a solemn Joint Declaration concerning the sustainable development \nof the Joint Management Area in the Mascarene Plateau Region. The Declaration, Madam \nSpeaker, reflects a deliberate political choice by both Mauritius and Seychelles, in that the \nsovereignty over maritime resources must be exercised responsibly, sustainably and in full \nrespect of international law. \nThe Declaration operationalises the 2012 Treaty on the Joint Management of the \nContinental Shelf in the Mascarene Plateau Region. It embeds environmental safeguards into \nevery aspect of resource exploration and exploitation in the Joint Management Area. It \naffirms our commitment to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the Nairobi \nConvention, and the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, particularly \nSDG 14. \nThis Declaration further consolidates the legal and institutional framework which the \nJoint Commission of the Joint Management Area has established for its effective joint \nmanagement.  These comprise a series of legal codes which have been elaborated further to \nthe signature of the Treaty – \n(i) \nThe Environmental Code of Practice; \n(ii) \nThe Model Petroleum Agreement; \n(iii) The Offshore Petroleum Safety Code; \n(iv) The Joint Fiscal and Taxation Code, and \n(v) \nThe Marine Scientific Research Code. \nIn addition, Madam Speaker, progress in the following areas has been noted during the \nlast meeting of the Joint Commission of the Joint Management Area – \n(i) \nthe conduct of a Sustainable Exploratory Fisheries for sea cucumber;  \n(ii) \npotential for Carbon Credit projects; \n(iii) Joint Management Area Information System; \n(iv) Oil Spill Contingency Plan and Monitoring, Control and Surveillance; \n(v) \nGeotechnical/Seismic Survey; \n(vi) Monaco Indian Ocean Explorations, 2022; \n(vii) Domestication of Joint Management Area Codes, and \n(viii) Progress on Strategic Plan 2023-2027. \nWith regard to part (c) of the question, this Government wishes to underline our \nreadiness to pursue further technical discussions on the conduct of geotechnical surveys in \nthe Joint Management Area, which are essential to improve scientific understanding of the \nseabed and its resources. The two coastal States are presently finalising the agreement for the \nconduct of geotechnical surveys with the Company CGG/Veridien, based in UK. These \nprospective activities will, however, be undertaken strictly within established environmental \nsafeguards and in full adherence to national and international obligations, thus ensuring that \nthe ecological integrity of the marine environment of the Mascarene Plateau is preserved \nwhile ensuring that conservation considerations remain paramount. \nMadam Speaker, the Joint Management Area remains a strategic partnership between \nMauritius and Seychelles. It is a symbol of our shared responsibility to manage the resources \nof the Mascarene Plateau wisely, balancing economic opportunity with ecological \nstewardship. The recent State Visit has, in fact, reinforced this partnership and charted the \ncourse for deeper collaboration in the years ahead. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, briefly because I am short of time. \nMr Lobine: May I ask the hon. Prime Minister whether he can enlighten the House \nwhether there is existence of hydrocarbons within this Joint Management Area? Is there any \npreliminary report further to the agreement reached in 2014 to have a preliminary report with \nregard to presence of hydrocarbons within the JMA? Do we have any preliminary report for \nthat? \nThe Prime Minister: We know that Seychelles had already started doing this, even \nbefore we looked at the matter. There are, apparently. There are indications that there might \nbe. We are still exploring. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, Dr. Ms Daureeawo, last question! \nMAURITIAN DIASPORA SCHEME – SKILLED PROFESSIONALS RETURN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/81",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 81,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/81) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Mauritian diaspora, he will state – \n(a)  whether consideration is being given for the strengthening of the scheme therefor, \nand  \n(b)  the measures being taken to facilitate the return of highly skilled professionals \nthereof to Mauritius.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Economic Development \nBoard that the Mauritian Diaspora Scheme, which was established in 2015, has attracted \nsome 614 members of the Mauritian diaspora to return to the country.   \nIn addition, I am informed that there have been instances of abuse in the availing of the \nbenefits under the Scheme.  \nAs announced in the 2025-2026 Budget Speech, we are reviewing the scheme to \nenhance its effectiveness and making it less restrictive in facilitating the return of our \nvaluable Mauritian diaspora members, including highly skilled professionals, while at the \nsame time addressing the loopholes which have allowed the abuses of the scheme.  \nThe Economic Development Board is in the process of finalising the new Scheme \nwhich will be implemented shortly. \nI must remind the House, Madam Speaker, that we have announced in our Government \nProgramme of 2025-2029 the formulation of a Diaspora Policy to better engage our diaspora \nin the development of our country. There are encouraging signs that highly qualified \nmembers of our diaspora are coming back to serve the country. I explained, I think I did say \non a few occasions that we now have members of the diaspora serving as the Governor of the \nBank of Mauritius, as the CEO of the Mauritius Telecom, at the State Bank of Mauritius and \nalso recently, at the Forensic Science Laboratory. \nIt is important that we strengthen our engagement with them and put in place the right \nframework to make the most of their contributions, especially in areas such as investment, \nskills and knowledge, remittances as well as cultural and social ties. \nIn this context, with the assistance of the International Organisation for Migration, the \nservices of a consultant have been enlisted for the development of a National Diaspora Policy \nand Action Plan. The consultant has already submitted a first Report.  A draft National \nDiaspora Policy, with a governance structure for the Diaspora and Global Advisory Council, \nhas also been prepared.  The report of the consultant is being validated by the International \nOrganisation for Migration in consultation with all stakeholders. \nOur objective, Madam Speaker, is not only to encourage the Mauritian diaspora to \nreturn to the country but also to participate in the national development regardless of location \nor distance from Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker: Very interesting! Yes, good! \nNow, the Table has been advised that several PQs have been withdrawn: B/82, B/85, \nB/88, B/90, B/93, B/94, B/95, and B/97. \nThank you. \nI think we can stop here and we will start in one and a half hour with questions \naddressed to hon. Ministers. Is that alright? \nThank you. \nAt 12.51 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.30 p.m., with Madam Speaker in the Chair.  \nMadam Speaker: You may be seated.  \nHon. Members, we now have questions addressed to hon. Ministers. We have two \nhours to go.  \nThe Table has been advised that PQ B/141 will be replied by the hon. Minister of \nNational Infrastructure. He is not here for the moment. \nHon. Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central. \nPUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTIONS – STAFF SHORTAGE – RECRUITMENT & \nNEW INCENTIVES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/82",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 82,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/82) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port-Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the laundering of money suspected of being proceeds of drug trafficking, since \nNovember 2024 to date, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Financial \nCrimes Commission and the Commissioner of Police, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of suspected drug dealers arrested in relation thereto, and  \n(b) \nlist of vehicles including cars, motorbikes and quads and pleasure craft seized in \nconnection therein, indicating the total estimated value thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUES – GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE – REPORTED CASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/83",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 83,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/83) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Gender-Based \nViolence in Rodrigues Island, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the number of reported cases thereof over the past \nfive years.",
      "answer": "Reply: According to the United Nations Declaration, Gender-Based Violence is any act \nof violence directed against a person on the basis of their gender, resulting in, or likely to \nresult in, physical, sexual or psychological harm or suffering, including threats of such acts, \ncoercion, or deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or in private life. \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Police that, from 01 January 2021 to 18 March \n2026, 646 cases of Gender-Based Violence were reported to the Police in Rodrigues, amongst \nwhich 581 cases of domestic violence, 28 cases of family violence, and, of particular concern, \n37 cases of sexual violence, related to rape.  \nI am further informed that, of the 646 reported cases, 480 have been disposed by the \nCourt, 36 have been formally charged and are awaiting trial, 10 are pending advice from the \nDirector of Public Prosecutions and 120 are under Police investigation.  \nGovernment is concerned of the gravity of Gender-Based Violence and remains fully \ncommitted to preventing and combating all forms of such violence. In this regard, the Police, \nin collaboration with the Brigade pour la Protection de la Famille, the Commission for \nWomen’s Affairs, Child Development, Family Welfare, Consumer Protection and Handicraft \nof the Rodrigues Regional Assembly, the National Empowerment Foundation, non-\ngovernmental organisations, and other relevant stakeholders, have strengthened and expanded \nmeasures to protect victims and deter perpetrators.  \nThese measures include – \n(i) \nprovision of counselling and psychological support services to victims; \n(ii) \naccess to shelters and safe accommodation for victims in need of protection; \n(iii) operation of dedicated 24/7 hotlines by the Commission; \n(iv) support to victims in terms of legal assistance through a dedicated Legal Resource \nPerson, and \n(v) \nsensitisation and awareness campaigns at community level to promote gender \nequality and respect for human rights.  \nI would like to reiterate that Government remains fully committed to preventing and \ncombating all forms of Gender-Based Violence. Sustained measures are being implemented \nto strengthen legal frameworks, including the Domestic Abuse Bill currently under \npreparation. \nIn addition, on 06 March 2026, Government has agreed to the introduction of a new \nscheme under the National Solidarity Fund for the payment of an allowance to victims of \ndomestic violence residing in shelters, with a view to promoting their economic \nempowerment and supporting their reintegration into society. Government will continue to \ntake resolute and coordinated action to safeguard victims, deter perpetrators, and uphold a \nculture of zero tolerance towards violence in all its forms. \n \nMAURITIUS – SDDS+ UPGRADE – KEY BENEFITS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/84",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 84,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "B/84\nThe Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix  \n(Mr Lobine)  \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Chagos Archipelago, he will state \nwhether his office has been formally notified of the statement \nmade by the President of the Republic of Maldives on  \n2 February 2026, indicating (a) the diplomatic and legal \nmeasures being envisaged/taken by Government following \nsame and (b) how same may impact the (i) Chagos \nArchipelago treaty signed in May 2025 between the United \nKingdom and the Republic of Mauritius and (ii) issue on \nmaritime boundary contained in the 2023 ruling of the \nInternational Tribunal for the Law of the Sea?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/85",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 85,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/85) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nupgrading of Mauritius to the Special Data Dissemination Standard Plus (SDDS+) status by \nthe International Monetary Fund, he will state the – \n(a) \nmeasures taken by Government that led thereto, and  \n(b) \nkey benefits associated therewith, particularly, in terms of access to financing, \ninvestment prospects and economic resilience.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIAN ECONOMY – DIVERSIFICATION – 5-10 YEARS’ ROAD MAP",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/86",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 86,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/86) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Mauritian \neconomy, he will state the specific new sectors Government proposes to develop with a view \nto diversifying same, indicating the implementation road map and timeline therefor with the \nprojected impact in terms of Gross Domestic Product contribution, export earnings and job \ncreation over the next five to ten years.",
      "answer": "Reply: As the country at large is aware, when we took office in November 2024, we \ninherited an economy in deep distress, marked by structural imbalances and weakened \nmacroeconomic fundamentals. The prevailing economic model, driven by consumption \ngrowth, had become increasingly unsustainable.  Productivity growth was sluggish in key \nsectors of the economy. The budget deficit and public sector debt reached unprecedented high \nlevels, while the trade deficit deteriorated significantly, driven by strong import dependence \nand limited export diversification. \nDoing nothing and continuing on the same trajectory was not an option.  We had to do \naway with the consumption-driven approach and adopt a new economic model that is \ninvestment-led, productivity-based and export-driven.   \nThis implies a fundamental restructuring and diversification of our economy.  \nEconomic diversification is an existential imperative.  That is why in the 2025-2026 Budget \nSpeech, we announced the creation of four new Pôles de Croissance, that will open new \nfrontiers for economic activity, export earnings and job creation.  \nThese Pôles de Croissance are renewable energy, waste-to-wealth initiatives, the blue \neconomy, and creative industries.   \nAs regards renewable energy, our objective goes beyond a simple transition to cleaner \nsources of power; it is to build a fully-fledged domestic industry around local renewable \nsources of energy.  In the coming years, the new industry will mobilise billions of rupees of \ninvestments and generate several employment opportunities. \nThe second Pôle de Croissance focuses on the implementation of a range of waste-to-\nwealth initiatives such as waste-to-compost, and waste-to-energy projects.  Our objective is to \nfoster a circular economy.  In this respect, the incentive framework is being finalised by the \nEconomic Development Board and will be implemented shortly. \nThird is the blue economy. With an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of 2.3 million \nsquare kilometres, there is enormous potential for unlocking economic value from the EEZ.  \nSectors that will be developed are mainly sustainable fisheries and aquaculture, ocean-based \nrenewable energy, and marine transport and trade and minerals we might be able to exploit. \nThe fourth Pôle de Croissance is the creative industries, which we will be positioning \nas a dynamic and innovation-driven sector with strong potential for value creation and export \ngrowth.  \nBeyond these four Pôles de Croissance, Government will also drive the development of \nthe digital economy as a key pillar of future growth.  During my state visits in India, I invited \nleading IT firms to establish their operations in Mauritius as part of our strategy to position \nthe country as a regional hub for digital and technology driven services.  In this context, we \nare setting up a Special Economic Zone at Côte d’Or which will be designed as a next-\ngeneration digital and innovation hub. This hub will cater for cutting-edge activities such as \nartificial intelligence, digital finance, fintech, digital banking and payments, cybersecurity, \ncloud computing, disaster recovery and data centres.   \nFurthermore, in view of the recent conflict in the Gulf region, we will expand and \nmodernise the port to reposition Port Louis as the premier transshipment hub of the Indian \nOcean region.  Major investments will be made in infrastructure development and the \nadoption of latest technologies.   \nWe will continue to expand our economic base and diversify into a number of emerging \nsectors. These include the digital-driven services, artificial intelligence, the pharmaceutical \nindustry, medical tourism, medical devices manufacturing, advanced manufacturing, the \nknowledge hub, the creative industry, and green and sustainable finance. \nNotwithstanding these diversification efforts, we will further redynamise existing \nsectors by enhancing productivity, fostering innovation, and promoting value addition across \ntraditional industries such as tourism, manufacturing and financial services. \nThis will strengthen their resilience, improve competitiveness, and ensure their long-\nterm sustainability in an evolving global environment. \nWe are also working out the Vision 2050, which will provide a coherent and integrated \nframework that will identify the priority sectors for further economic diversification, and sets \nclear investment roadmaps and milestones. \nAs I have already stated, this year the economy will be our priority.  We will thus give \nprominence to policies and measures aimed at boosting the economy’s growth potential, \nraising productivity and competitiveness, creating quality employment, and improving living \nstandards for all Mauritians. \n \nRODRIGUES – FLOODING – COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT – \nFINANCIAL ASSISTANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/87",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 87,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/87) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the recent flooding in \nRodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether a \ncomprehensive assessment of the losses sustained has been carried out and, if so, indicate – \n(a) \nthe findings thereof, including the number of persons and households affected \ntherewith and the nature thereof, and  \n(b) \nwhether Government intends to extend financial assistance to the inhabitants \naffected therewith through the Prime Minister’s Relief Fund and, if so, give \ndetails thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: I shall reply to PQ B/87 and PQ B/91 together as they relate to the same subject. \nI am informed by the Rodrigues Regional Assembly that during the torrential rains \nfrom 14 to 15 March 2026, the Rodrigues Emergency Operations Command received more \nthan 100 requests for assistance from households, including 20 cases of flooded houses, 21 \ncases of obstructed roads/bridges/drains, 30 cases of water accumulation and 8 cases of fallen \ntrees.  Each request was attended to promptly. \nThe Rodrigues Regional Assembly has conducted an assessment of the damages caused \nfollowing the recent torrential rains, and has submitted a report to my Office on 24 March \n2026. \nRegarding part (a) of question B/87, I am informed by the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly that 332 cases have been reported on damages caused to Foodstuff/Personal \nbelongings; Animal feed/Animals; Agricultural Products; Construction Materials; Vehicles \nand Commercial Buildings.  \nThe Rodrigues Regional Assembly has proposed the following remedial measures to \nmitigate the risks associated with torrential rains and flooding in the short-term and long-term \n– \n(a) \nRehabilitation of drains and Road Networks;  \n(b) \nRehabilitation of Sports Infrastructures; \n(c) \nUpgrading of Cultural and Leisure Centre; \n(d) \nAgriculture - Land Rehabilitation and drains; \n(e) \nConsolidation of the Disaster Risk Reduction Management Centre, and \n(f) \nUpgrading and uplifting of Refugee Centres. \nThe cost estimates for these remedial works amount to Rs459 million. These figures \nwill have to be re-worked.  \nUpon my request, the Minister of National Infrastructure proceeded to Rodrigues on 21 \nMarch 2026 to assess de visu the extent of damages caused due to the floodings and to come \nup with remedial measures for immediate implementation.  \nIn regard to part (b) of question B/87 and question B/91, I wish to reassure our citizens \nin Rodrigues that we shall extend all necessary assistance to them. The report submitted by \nthe Rodrigues Regional Assembly will be examined to determine the type and quantum of \nassistance to be provided. \n \nDRUG DEALING – DRUGS & ASSETS SEIZED – JANUARY 2025-MARCH 2026",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/88",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 88,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/88) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to drug \ndealing, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police and the \nFinancial Crimes Commission, information as to, since January 2025 to date, the quantity of \ndrugs and number of assets seized, respectively.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIAN PASSPORT – BIOMETRIC PASSPORT – PROPOSED \nREPLACEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/89",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 89,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/89) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Mauritian passport, he will state where matters stand as to the proposed \nreplacement thereof by the biometric passport.",
      "answer": "Reply: The specifications for the biometric passport will be finalised shortly. Some of \nthe main features of the biometric passport would include the following – \n(a) \nan embedded contactless electronic chip within the passport booklet which will \nstore personal and biometric data of the passport holder; \n(b) \nadvanced security features, including encryption, access control and anti-\ntampering mechanisms; \n(c) \na secure Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) to support authentication and \nverification processes; \n(d) \nonline application and live photo capture capability, and \n(e) \nintegration with relevant Government databases and services to streamline \nregistration and verification processes. \nIn view of security and confidentiality aspects of the project and also given the fact the \npersonal information of passport holders would be processed and stored in a microchip, my \nOffice, in collaboration with the Ministry of Information Technology, Communication, and \nInnovation as well as the Passport and Immigration Office, is presently exploring various \noptions regarding the most suitable procurement method for the biometric passport system. \n \nGRA – APPRENTICE JOCKEYS & JOCKEYS – INSURANCE PREMIUM",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/90",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 90,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/90) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \ngranting of licences to local and international apprentice jockeys and jockeys respectively, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Gambling Regulatory Authority, \ninformation as to the type of insurance required therefor, indicating – \n(a) \nthe monthly or yearly premium applicable category-wise, and  \n(b) \nif there is an age limit for apprentice jockeys and, if so, give the reasons therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUES – RECENT FLOODING – SUPPORT TO VICTIMS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/91",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 91,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/91) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the recent flooding in \nRodrigues Island, he will state whether consideration is being given for the granting of \nsupport to the victims thereof.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/87) \nMR F. D. & FAMILY – DRC REFUGEES – WORK PERMITS & SCHOOLING \nFACILITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/92",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 92,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/92) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Mr and Mrs F. D., and their five children, refugees from the Democratic Republic \nof Congo/Republic of Congo, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nwhether consideration will be given for Mr and Mrs F. D. to be granted work permits and the \nchildren to be authorised to attend public school in Mauritius.",
      "answer": "Reply: Mr F.D., his spouse Mrs O.N. and their three children, all nationals from the \nDemocratic Republic of the Congo, landed in Mauritius on 06 July 2024. They arrived in \nMauritius onboard a South African Airways flight from Zimbabwe via South Africa and were \nheading to Cook Islands via Mauritius and Perth, Australia. On arrival in Mauritius, they \nproceeded to the transit counters for their connecting flight to Perth, but were refused to \nboard as they did not possess the required transit visa to enter Australia. Consequently, they \nwere referred to Passport and Immigration Officers. Given that Mr F.D. and his family had \nthe intention to travel to Australia without the required visa, they were refused entry into \nMauritius and the airline company which had carried them was served with a Removal Order \nso that they could be brought back to their last port of embarkation, which is Zimbabwe. \nWhile waiting to be repatriated, Mrs O.N. felt unwell and upon being examined by the \nmedical team at the airport, it was found that she was thirty-six weeks pregnant. Mrs O.N. \nhad not disclosed her pregnancy nor had she provided a medical certificate ascertaining her \nfitness to travel prior to flying to Mauritius. Given her health condition, she was admitted to \nJawaharlal Nehru Hospital in Rose Belle. Mr F.D. and his children were admitted into \nMauritius and they went to stay in a guesthouse in Mahebourg. On 10 July 2024, that is, only \nfour days after her arrival, Mrs O.N. gave birth to a baby boy and the birth was duly \nregistered by the Civil Status Office at Grand Port. \nDuring enquiry, Mr F.D. informed the Passport and Immigration Office that he himself, \nhis spouse and their three children had refugee status certificates issued by the Government of \nZambia since 30 November 2023 in accordance with Zambian legislation which has \nincorporated the provisions of the United Nations Convention relating to the Status of \nRefugees. \nMauritius has not acceded to the United Nations Convention relating to the Status of \nRefugees, but adheres to the principle of “non-refoulement”. To ensure that he obtains \ninternational protection for all his family members in Mauritius, Mr F.D. registered his family \nwith the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and they \nhave been granted a UNHCR Refugee Certificate which certifies that they are refugees and \nshould be protected from forcible return to a country where they would face threats to their \nlives or freedom.  Their UNHCR Refugee Certificate has been periodically renewed and the \nlast certificate issued to them will expire on 18 September 2026. Although it is incumbent on \nUNHCR to cater for the resettlement of Mr F.D. and his family, the UNHCR has, so far, not \nbeen able to do so. \nOn 13 July 2024, following the discharge of Mrs O.N. from hospital, the family was \ntaken charge by Caritas Mauritius, which is a non-governmental organisation, and with the \nassistance of UNHCR, they were accommodated in a house in Grand Gaube. Mr F.D. was \ninformed by the Passport and Immigration Office that he and his family would be allowed to \nstay in Mauritius pending resettlement by UNHCR. He was also informed that his children \ncould access to private schooling only and that he and his spouse should not engage in any \ngainful activities during their stay in Mauritius, as the Immigration Act does not provide for \nrefugees to be eligible for a residence permit. \nSince then, the Passport and Immigration Office has been monitoring the situation of \nMr F.D. and has regularly convened him for statements. Mr F.D. has also experienced \ndifficulties to leave Mauritius for Cook Islands. The child born in July 2024 was only issued \nwith a passport by the authorities of Democratic Republic of the Congo on 27 May 2025. By \nthen, Mrs O.N. was pregnant again and therefore could not travel. She gave birth to another \nbaby on 11 July 2025, who was then issued with a passport on 18 December 2025. Mr F.D. \nhas also experienced financial difficulties to purchase air tickets for Cook Islands. \nOn 20 March 2026, the Passport and Immigration Office convened Mr F.D. for a \nstatement wherein he indicated that he has managed to gather funds from public donations \nand refunds from Air Mauritius. However, he was still short of some Rs120,000. He \nreiterated his desire to go to Cook Islands and stated that once he has managed to purchase \nhis air tickets, his barrister would assist him in applying for the transit visa in Australia to \nenable him to proceed to his destination. \nGiven the intention and desire of Mr F.D. to proceed to Cook Islands, no permit, \nwhether residence or work permits, has been issued or will be issued to him. As regards \nschooling of Mr F.D.’s children, he was informed to avail of private schooling services. \nThe case of Mr F.D. and his family has demonstrated that there is a need for Mauritius \nto establish a system and mechanism to cater for non-citizens requesting for international \nprotection. While it was initially believed that Mr F.D. and his family would promptly leave \nMauritius to their final destination, they faced complications which impeded their travel from \nMauritius. My Office, with the assistance of the Attorney General’s Office, is currently \nengaging with UNHCR to review the current policies regarding non-citizens claiming for \ninternational protection and refugees in terms of their legal status and right to work in \nMauritius. \nSTATE OF THE ECONOMY REPORT – OFFICIAL STATISTICS – \nMANIPULATION ALLEGATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/93",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 93,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/93) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the allegations of manipulation of official statistics and data referred to in the State \nof the Economy Report, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nwhether an inquiry has been carried out thereinto and, if so, indicate the outcome thereof, \nincluding whether it has revealed – \n(a) \nevidence of falsification or manipulation of data, and  \n(b) \nthe number of persons allegedly involved therein and, if so, indicate the number \nthereof interrogated and/or arrested in connection therewith and charges, if any, \npreferred against them.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nPOLICE QUARTERS – RETIREMENT ON MEDICAL GROUNDS – \nACCOMMODATION POLICY REVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/94",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 94,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/94) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Police Officers, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner \nof Police, information as to the number thereof having had to vacate their lodging in police \nquarters on retiring due to sudden or serious illness, indicating – \n(a) \nthe delay granted thereto and their families to find alternative accommodation, \nand  \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given for a review of the current practice in such \ncircumstances.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nEDB – DEPUTY CEO, MR S.M. – APPOINTMENT & CONTRACT’S TERMS & \nCONDITIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/95",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 95,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/95) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mr. S. M., Deputy \nChief Executive Officer of the Economic Development Board, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to his date and terms and conditions of appointment, indicating \nthe circumstances under which his contract was renewed and the terms and conditions of his \nnew contract.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUES POLICE BAND – RECRUITMENT EXERCISE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/96",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 96,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/96) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Rodrigues Police \nBand, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, \ninformation as to when recruitment was last carried out thereat, indicating whether \nconsideration will be given to proceeding with recruitment therefor, in view of its current \nunderstaffing and the recurrent need to bring Police Band officers from Mauritius for major \nceremonies.",
      "answer": "Reply: The Police Band Unit operates under the supervision of the Commanding \nOfficer of the Special Mobile Force. The unit is currently staffed with 65 Police Band \nOfficers of various ranks, headed by an Assistant Superintendent of Police, and seven officers \nare presently posted within the Rodrigues Sub-Unit of the Police Band. \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Police that the recruitment for the post of Band \nConstable was conducted on 05 February 2026. Seven candidates were enlisted as Band \nConstables on a temporary capacity. On the same day, they joined the Mauritius Police Force. \nI am further informed that there are currently 68 funded posts within the Police Band \nestablishment, of which, 65 are presently filled, leaving 3 funded vacancies. \nAs regards recruitment, the Disciplined Forces Service Commission does not issue \nseparate notice of vacancy for Rodrigues or Agalega. The notice of vacancy for the post of \nBand Constable is open to all eligible candidates in Mauritius as well as residents of \nRodrigues and Agalega. \nIn respect to the deployment of officers from the National Police Band to Rodrigues for \nmajor official events requiring enhanced musical support, this forms part of the normal \noperational arrangements. For other events and activities, the existing staffing level of the \nRodrigues Sub-Unit is sufficient to meet operational needs. \nFCC – SEIZED ASSETS (NOV 2024-MAR 2026) – NUMBER DISPOSED & VALUE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/97",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 97,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/97) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the assets \nseized by the Financial Crimes Commission since November 2024 to date, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to the number thereof disposed and the total value \nthereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRESIDENTIAL CARE HOMES – NUMBER REGISTERED & UNREGISTERED, \nINSPECTIONS & HYGIENE & SAFETY STANDARDS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/98",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 98,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/98) Dr F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port-Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the public health \ninstitutions, he will state the total number of nurses and doctors required on a daily basis to \ncope with the workload thereat, indicating the – \n(a) \nadditional recruitment needs thereof; \n(b) \nmeasures taken to retain experienced nursing staff, and  \n(c) \nnew incentives being envisaged to attract school leavers to the nursing profession.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I am informed that my Ministry is currently undertaking \na comprehensive human resources for health assessment with regard to the medical and \nnursing cadre with a view to determining present and projected staffing requirements, \nidentifying critical gaps and informing evidence-based workforce planning and policy \ndecisions for the health sector. \nAs per statistics available, the total number of nurses and doctors required on a daily \nbasis to cope with the workload in public health institutions varies according to the services. \nHence, the number will differ on weekdays and weekends. I am informed that on average \n1417 doctors including medical and health officers and specialists and 1715 nurses are \nrequired on a daily basis.  \nMadam Speaker, upon my assumption of office, I took cognizance that there was a \ncritical shortage of doctors and nurses at the level of all public health institutions, resulting in \nsignificant overtime work, bank sessions and extra session of all grades and this situation was \nalso resulting in increasing absenteeism and burnout. \nIn view thereof, the Budget 2025-2026 provided for the recruitment of additional nurses \nand doctors namely, the recruitment of 1000 trainee nurses over the next three years since \n2025. In addition, provision was also made for recruitment of 50 medical and health officers \nand 30 specialists among others to reinforce the staffing of my Ministry in these critical \ngrades. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part(a) of the question, I am informed that there is a \ntotal of 1236 medical and health officers and 1965 nursing officers in post. My Ministry has \nrecruited a total of 101 medical and health officers and 12 specialists. 14 more medical and \nhealth officers are expected to assume duty in the coming months. The recruitment of 46 \nspecialists is in progress. Furthermore, my Ministry is amending the scheme of service of the \ngrade medical and health officer to ease the recruitment of doctors.  \nMadam Speaker, the House may also wish to note that there are 123 medical and health \nofficers who are on leave, either for studies or other purposes. In order to palliate for their \nabsence, my Ministry has recruited 43 medical and health officers on contract. In view of the \nnon-availability of registered doctors on the local market, it is not possible to fill all the \nvacant positions. \nMadam Speaker, as regard nursing staff, I am informed that each year, approximately \n60 nursing officers retire on reaching the age of 65. In addition, a significant number of \nnursing officers leave the public service for various reasons, further exacerbating the \nshortage.  \nMadam Speaker, 223 trainee nurses were enlisted on 22 September 2025 following a \nvacancy advertisement and are undergoing a 3-year course at the Central School of Nursing. \nIn addition, 138 trainee nurses who joined the training 3 years ago, will complete their \ntraining by August 2026.  \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that the recruitment of nurse educators is currently \nunderway as part of a strategic initiative to transcend training capacity with the health care \nsystem and ensure the continuity of training. This measure is intended to enhance the quality \nand output of nursing education, support the expansion of training programmes and ensure a \nsustainable number of qualified nursing officers who are available to meet present and future \nservice delivery needs. \nMadam Speaker, my Ministry has expanded the range of services to respond to \nevolving needs in patient care including diabetic footcare, renal transplant, cardiac services \nand geriatric services among others which necessitate the deployment of additional doctors \nand nursing staff for the effective operationalisation. \nHowever, in view of the prevailing shortage of medical and nursing personnel across \npublic health institutions, further introduction and full implementation of certain new services \ncannot be envisaged at this stage. \nMadam Speaker, to address the significant shortage of staff in nursing cadre, the \nfollowing measures have been taken by my Ministry to address the shortfall – \n67 nursing officers are currently employed on a month-to-month basis; \n45 retired nursing officers are presently employed on a sessional basis on the bank \nscheme; \nApproval was obtained for recruitment of 126 nurses on sessional basis. However, \nonly 35 nurses assumed duty following offer made to 41 eligible candidates, and \nEmployment of 15 nursing officers on contractual basis for a period of one year is \nunderway. \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed that the scheme of service for the post of nursing \nofficer has been amended in November 2025 to provide opportunities for candidates who \nhave successfully completed recognised nursing programme other than the central school of \nnursing such as Polytechnics Mauritius Ltd and other universities to be recruited in the \ngovernment service. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to parts (b) and (c) of the question, I am informed that the \nrecommendations of the Pay Research Bureau 2026 provide both retention mechanism for \nserving nursing officers and incentives to enhance attractiveness of profession for school \nleavers. I am informed that officers of nursing officer cadre are allowed to accumulate \nvacation leave beyond the authorised ceiling with the option to work during the excess \naccumulated leave period and received payment in lieu at the time of retirement. \nProvision is also made for the refund of unutilised casual leave. These measures \ncontribute to improve conditions of service and serve as an incentive for retention.  \nMadam Speaker, in addition nursing officers are granted release to follow Continuous \nProfessional Development courses as they are required by law to obtain a minimum of 10 \nCPD credit points annually for registration with the nursing school. \nThis facilitation of continuous training and professional development not only support \nthe retention of experienced staff, but also enhances the overall appeal of the nursing \nprofession to prospective entrance, including school leavers.  \nMadam Speaker, in line with the budgetary measures in financial year 2025-2026, my \nMinistry will pursue further recruitment of 700 trainee nurses in the two subsequent years. \nBut in view of the shortage of qualified candidates locally, it is unlikely that such recruitment \nexercise will yield positive outcome. \nIn view of the circumstances, a proposal to recruit 200 nursing officers from abroad is \nunder consideration by my Ministry, subject to all necessary approvals are being obtained. \nThis measure is intended to compliment ongoing local training and recruitment initiative for \nthe short term.  \nMadam Speaker, my Ministry remains firmly committed to strengthening the healthcare \nworkforce, which is crucial to ensure the continued delivery of quality service in public \nhealth institutions. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Obviously, we do have an ongoing shortage \nof nursing personnel in this country. May I ask the hon. Minister whether he will consider the \nsetting up of a foundation programme run by the Mauritius Institute of Health that can be \nused as a template for those who, unfortunately, do not meet the criteria to enter the Central \nNursing School of the Polytechnics. This will boost the number of school leavers or those \nwho are lesser achievers to get into a career of nursing? Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Minister! \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, we have already revised the scheme of service. We have \nbrought it slightly down so as those who are getting training in the universities, those who \nhave university degrees, and those who are diploma holders from the universities and \nPolytechnics, they will be authorised and they will be allowed to compete. They will be \nallowed to take part in the selection exercise. \nUnfortunately, though we have done that, there has not been any good return. There has \nnot been too much of interest into it. I have no objection if tomorrow we could start a crash \ncourse or an important course by the Mauritius Institute of Health. We can do it. Our main \nproblem is: I do not know what is the mentality of our youth these days. They are not willing \nto come towards the health sector.  \nBut I will try, if such is the suggestion, I am going to look into it. But I can tell that \nactually, there are many who have already undergone training at the Polytechnics and in the \nuniversities. Unfortunately, they are not willing to join the service. Although, according to the \nPRB report, they have been given a lot of incentives. But I will try, if this is an advice. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Hon. Dr. Prayag! \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Maybe the hon. Minister could consider to \nget new recruits to sign bonds so that they work for at least a few years before they go to \nother sectors or the private sector? \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, they will take to their heels once I take this decision. It is \nimpossible! \nMadam Speaker: I did not understand, I am sorry. I did not understand your reply. \nMr Bachoo: My reply is simple: If in case I am going to introduce it, all of them will \nrun away! \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nMr Bachoo: I will not have anyone to serve in the hospitals. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Yes, hon. Rookny! \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, could the hon. Minister advise whether his main reply as \nregards to the recruitment of nursing trainers – as we need more–does it not contradict with \nthe actions of the Polytechnics in not renewing the contracts of some twenty nursing trainers? \nMr Bachoo: The Polytechnics does not fall under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of \nHealth. But I am told they were contractual workers. Here, in our case, the Mauritius Institute \nof Health was a very flourishing organisation – a very important organisation internationally \nrecognised. \nUnfortunately, during the last ten years, they have destroyed everything. That is the \nreason why we have to recreate it now, and we have to recruit trainee nurses so that the new \nrecruits can get the best form of training. That is the only reason. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Yes, Dr. Prayag! \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, Madam Speaker. But what if the Ministry of Health in \ncollaboration with the Ministry of Education sponsor education for nursing students and then \nget them to sign bonds so that they stay in the service? \nMr Bachoo: You know, to start with, they are not interested. Our problem is we had \nadvertised; they are not interested in coming. If they are not interested in coming, how can \nyou ask them to sign a bond? We have to create an atmosphere where they will take an \ninterest to serve. So, the aspect of service is not there. That is the problem. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. You will have time to brood on it, all of you. It sounds like a \nvery important issue.  \nThe hon. Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \nEDUCATIONAL SECTOR – PROPOSED REFORM",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/99",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 99,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/99) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether in regard to the proposed \nreform of the educational sector, he will state where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Member for this PQ which will \nallow me to inform the House where matters stand regarding the proposed reform in the \neducational sector. There are a series of changes which have already been undertaken.  \nToday, with the Foundation Programme which has replaced the Extended Programme, \nwe are already giving nearly 2,500 students the opportunity to follow an academic pathway \nwhich suits them. We are also giving nearly 4,000 students with three and four credits the \nopportunity to do their HSC instead of heartlessly kicking them out of the system, like the \nprevious regime. Obviously, this decision may impact on the quality of HSC results next year. \nMadam Speaker, while the former Minister of Education did not believe in participative \nor collaborative strategic policy development framework, I opted to act differently. That is \nwhy my Ministry undertook extensive consultations during the Assises de l'Éducation held \nduring April and May 2025 in both Mauritius and Rodrigues to obtain stakeholders views on \npriority areas for reform in the education sector. \nSubsequently, a technical committee was set up to incorporate the feedback and \nrecommendations into the blueprint for education intended to serve as the strategic policy \nframework for educational sector transformation.  \nMadam Speaker, on 14 November 2025, the Government examined the first draft of the \nblueprint, and an inter-ministerial committee was constituted to further deepen the analysis of \nthe specific recommendations made in the blueprint. \nMeetings of the inter-ministerial committee were convened on 18, 21 and 24 November \n2025, respectively, and a report was submitted to Government on 28 November 2025. We \nknow that the public at large, parents and stakeholders in general at not always at ease with \nabrupt changes in the educational system. We know that any major change in the education \nsystem will have far-reaching impact on the lives and future of Mauritians. \nGiven that this Government believes in dialogue and consultations, it was agreed to \nhold further public consultations regarding proposals Options A and B as follows – \nOption A – Admission to Grade 7 in national and regional secondary schools \nbased on the PSAC assessment together with the abolition of the NCE \nexamination. \nOption B – admission to Grade 10 in national secondary schools following a \nreview of the existing mode of NCE assessments. \nMadam Speaker, on 05 December 2025, Government was further informed that a \ncommuniqué would be issued on the same day, inviting public comments on the options \nproposed. These consultations were held from 08 December to 20 January 2026. The later \ndate was subsequently extended to 13 February 2026.  \nMadam Speaker, these public consultations were conducted through an online survey \nwhich was carried to seek the views of the public at large on the proposed options which \nincludes – \nProposals for admission in secondary schools; \nGrading system at PSAC, and \nGender model for secondary schools. \nA consultative meeting was also convened on the subject on 15 January 2026 with \nMinisters, Junior ministers and Members of the National Assembly and Members of the \nRodrigues Regional Assembly. \nMadam Speaker, in the month of February 2026, further consultations were held with \nother relevant stakeholders including Service Diocésain de L'Éducation Catholique, the \nPrivate Secondary Education Authority, the Mauritius Examination Syndicate, the MIE, the \nSpecial Education Needs Authority as well as the unions of the primary and secondary \neducation sub sectors. \nFurthermore, on 05 February 2026, my Ministry engaged in a consultative meeting \nwith students and parents on options mentioned above. On 11 February 2026, further \nconsultations were held in Rodrigues, again, with students and parents. \nIn light of all these additional consultations, my Ministry convened a meeting of the \nInterministerial Committee on 23 March 2025 to review the findings and formulate \nrecommendations with regard to the preferred option for admission to secondary schools, the \ngrading system for PSAC and the proposed gender model for schools. \nMadam Speaker, although we are no longer in the consultation phase, innovative \nideas and new concepts continue to emerge. We care deeply for children. Under the current \nzonal system, for example, for admission in regional schools, a child may be required to \ntravel from Grand Gaube to La Tour Koeing or from Beau Bassin to eastern part of the \ncountry simply to attend school. This is unfair. We are therefore seriously considering \nreviewing the zonal system. \nMoreover, certain decisions taken by the previous government adversely affected the \ncurriculum for lower secondary. In practice, because students from the extended stream and \nmainstream were required to sit for the same National Certificate of Examinations, the \ncurriculum was adapted to accommodate the extended stream. Unfortunately, this did not \nadequately serve those students preparing for Cambridge Examinations. The result as we all \nknow speak for themselves. \nMadam Speaker, we have initiated serious discussions with Cambridge University \nregarding a new curriculum for lower secondary that is for grade 7 to grade 9 so that our \nstudents are adequately prepared to take the School Certificate Examinations in the future. \nSoon, the recommendations will be presented to the Cabinet and to the public. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nYes, hon. Jhummun! \nMr Jhummun: Can the hon. Minister inform the House whether there is a timeline as \nto when all these changes will be implemented? \nDr. Gungapersad: I wish to inform the hon. Member, with your permission Madam \nSpeaker, that certain decisions which we propose to bring, we have already started but there \nare certain decisions that we will have to respect, the legal timeframe before implementing \nthem. \nWe need to give sufficient time to stakeholders before implementing these measures, \ndepending which… \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Ramkalawon! \nMr Ramkalawon: Apart from academic reforms, is the hon. Minister catering for any \nmeasure to tackle the severe problem of indiscipline amongst youngsters in schools? \nDr. Gungapersad: Definitely, Madam Speaker, for the past 10 years, I will say, \nmuch was not done regarding – you are mentioning indiscipline – regarding proliferation of \ndrugs, bullying, other forms of indiscipline. Last year, hon. Member, we conducted a \nworkshop for nearly 10,000 members of the public, students, parents and so on, to sensitise \nthem on bullying. This year we have already started sensitisation campaign on cyber bullying \nwith the support of the hon. Minister of Information Technology – we have already \nundertaken it. We have sought the help of the police force in order to educate, sensitise, train \nour staff and students regarding the problem of drugs and what are the measures that have to \nbe taken. \nAnother important measure, Madam Speaker, is the emotional well-being of our kids. \nWhat are the factors that have to be taken so that we are not only focused on the academic \nside but the total development of our kids and especially at a time – let it be mentioned – \nwhen many kids come from broken homes, where there is domestic violence and so many \ntoxic activities taking place. How do we look after our kids amidst that situation; all these are \nbeing taken care of by different members of my Ministry and other stakeholders, other \nministries which are helping the Ministry of Education. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! \nYes, hon. Jhummun! \nMr Jhummun: Thank you, Madam Speaker. One of the major reforms is the \nreplacement of Extended Programme by the Foundation Programme. So, can the hon. \nMinister inform the House whether we are on the right track concerning the Foundation \nProgramme? \nDr. Gungapersad: Thank you very much for that question, hon. Member. I think it \nwas yesterday that you accompanied me along with hon. Dr. Ms. Daureeawo to a secondary \nschool in the South, if I am not mistaken, and we saw de visu, the good work of our kids. \nFor example, I wish, with your permission, to inform the House, we saw our girls, \nFoundation Programme Girls, of Grade 8, who were doing plumbing and they presented their \nwork. Also, given that we are talking about our import of food of 80% nearly, – hon. Minister \nMinister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries in Mauritius, will \ntake note of that – how our kids of Foundation Programme are coming with hydroponics and \nhow they are going for horizontal and vertical smart farming. \nSo, it is on the right track and I wish to inform the hon. Member that for the Foundation \nProgramme, soon we are going to recruit around 14 to 16 coordinators to look, to oversee the \nwork that is being done by the Foundation Programme because we are giving opportunities, \nMadam Speaker, to students. If we were not in power, if this Government were not here, we \nwould have kicked nearly 2500 students in the street by giving them a curriculum not adapted \nto their needs but, we, we are empowering these kids and gradually this may help at the \nvarious levels. For example, to address food security. But also, we are empowering these kids \nso that their skills can help in proper human resource management in the short and long term. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nWe are going to stick with that question, as usual very interesting. Okay then, after that. \nMr Jhummun: Thank you, Madam Speaker. As the hon. Minister is saying that \nopportunities are being given to students, will these students be given the opportunity to do \nOriental languages and KM at the same time? \nMadam Speaker: Oh my God!  No, hon. Minister, we had that question last week. \nSo, we are not going to go into that. We already had the question. Hon. Beechook, I \nthink asked the question. He replied – it is like we repeating every Tuesday. \nMr Jhummun: Madam, you have a sharp memory. \nMadam Speaker: Of course, I am interested in the subject. \nYes, Mr Etwareea! \nMr Etwareea: Merci, Madam Speaker, this question is not a joke, it is a philosophical \none. While we are talking about reforms, can we imagine that someday we organise all the \nexaminations, not just Cambridge but we have it done here in Mauritius? \nMadam Speaker: Oh, wow! Fantastic! \nDr. Gungapersad: We need to reflect, okay! We cannot throw an answer like that, all \nright? And, there are some papers at least, hon. Member will take note, there are some papers \nwhich are marked, prepared by Mauritians. Alright! \nMadam Speaker: Oriental languages? \nDr. Gungapersad: … and other subjects also. \nMadam Speaker: Okay with that question. Next question is First Member for Port-\nLouis Maritime and Port Louis East, hon. Juman! \nANJALAY COOPEN STADIUM – OPERATIONALITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/100",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 100,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/100) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port Louis Maritime & Port Louis \nEast) asked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Anjalay Coopen \nStadium, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Sports Council, \ninformation as to the date of coming into full operation thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, in my written reply PQ B/1098 of the Sitting of 25 \nNovember 2025, I have provided the reason why the Anjalay Coopen Stadium is not fully \noperational. \nI would like to highlight once again the deplorable state of sports infrastructures that \nthis government inherited from the previous regime. My Ministry has already initiated urgent \nand corrective actions to address the issues. \nThe main reasons why the Anjalay Coopen Stadium is not fully operational are as \nfollows – \n(i) \nheavy water leakage on the Grand stand; \n(ii) \nabsence of fire certificate due to faulty fire alarm system; \n(iii) defective fire hose reels and firefighting equipment; \n(iv) damaged bucket seats and unusable changing rooms; \n(v) \nbroken tiles and damaged false ceilings; \n(vi) flaking and cracking paints, and \n(vii) pigeon infestation. \nMadam Speaker, for the current financial year, an amount of Rs15 million has been \nprovided to my Ministry for upgrading works at Anjalay Coopen Stadium. \nAs at date, these funds have already been fully committed as follows – \n(a) \nA contract amounting to Rs13 million had been awarded for upgrading works. \nThe work comprised removal and replacement of damaged tiles in corridors and \nchanging rooms, repairs to spalled concrete, internal and external painting works \nto the front stadium block, application of floor dressing, paint where required, \nreplacement of damaged false ceiling, and removal of wooden ducting. These \nworks have been successfully completed last week. \n(b) \nA second contract amounting to some Rs3.2 million has been awarded for the \nsupply and installation of bird netting and other accessories such as eagle bird \neyes and propellers at the stadium. \nThe works are ongoing and are expected to be completed in April 2026. \nBids for supply and the installation of a new fire alarm system at the stadium are \ncurrently at evaluation stage. Thus, as a result of the works undertaken at the Anjalay Coopen \nStadium, no funds remain available under the current financial year for additional upgrading \nworks that are required to render the latter fully operational. The outstanding works that need \nto be undertaken thereat are as follows – \n\ngeneral electrical wiring and flooding repairs; \n\nmajor civil and piping works; \n\nwaterproofing works; \n\nreplacement of bucket seats; \n\nupgrading of the synthetic track; \n\ninstallation of a scoreboard, and \n\ngeneral painting work. \nMadam Speaker, in view of the extent and nature of the works required at the stadium, \nsubstantial investment will be necessary to restore it to the required standard. My Ministry \nhas already worked out a comprehensive scope of works for the rehabilitation of the whole \nstadium and a financial proposal will be made in the forthcoming Budget 2026-27 to the \nMinistry of Finance. Hence, at this stage, it would be premature to state a specific date for the \nreopening of the stadium. \nHowever, Madam Speaker, I wish to highlight that presently, other sections of the \nstadium are being put at the disposal of sports clubs and other organisations for sports and \nnon-sport activities. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Juman! \nMr Juman: Madam Speaker, from what we heard from the hon. Minister, it is clear \nthat it is not going to open in the next 12 or 18 months.  Despite the stadium being closed, are \nyou aware that we are spending around Rs1 million monthly as fixed cost and is this not a \nblatant case of spending public funds unjustly? \nMr Nagalingum: Like I said, there are some activities that are ongoing, some sport \nactivities like football matches, the parking is being used for some rallies that we are \norganising for the function and there are also some activities that are going on. So, we cannot \nstop that. We have curtailed a lot of expenses but we have to do with what we have. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Juman! \nMr Juman: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can I know from the hon. Minister when is \nthe last time a football match was played there? \nMr Nagalingum: Like I said, the stadium, what we inherited... \nMadam Speaker: Minister! \nMr Nagalingum: What we inherited... \nMadam Speaker: Minister! Minister! He asked a specific question. When? \nMr Nagalingum: I do not have the exact answer but I am... \nMadam Speaker: You do not have? \nMr Nagalingum: But I am saying... \nMadam Speaker: The answer is you do not know. \nMr Nagalingum: No, I am saying that we did not have a real match in the stadium \nbecause it was not homologated. \nMr Juman: You just said there was a football match recently. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, last supplementary! \nMr Juman: Though we spent around Rs13 million and we have a survey done by the \nCAF, can you lay the report of the survey to the National Assembly? \nMr Nagalingum: Following a close collaboration with the Mauritius Football \nAssociation (MFA), inspection of the stadium, Anjalay Coopen, was carried out by \nConfédération Africaine de Football (CAF) Stadium Inspector during his mission in June \n2025. As per the report submitted to the latter, the two stadiums – Anjalay Coopen and \nGeorge V Stadium – currently do not meet the minimum CAF Stadium Requirement, that you \njust asked, to host international matches. So, there is no homologation for these matches but \nthe CAF Inspector highlighted that the Anjalay Coopen Stadium required major upgrading \nworks that we are actually doing and what we have to do in the future. \nMadam Speaker: Can you lay on the Table, the CAF – I am not quite good at this one \n– Report? The CAF Report, is that what you want, hon. Juman? Yes, the CAF Report, can \nyou? \nMr Nagalingum: I can table the report. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, facile. That’s it. Next question, hon. Seeburn! \nELECTRIC & PLUG-IN HYBRID VEHICLES – REGISTERED NUMBER – \nISLAND-WIDE CHARGING FACILITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/101",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 101,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/101) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to electric and plug-in hybrid electric \nvehicles, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, \ninformation as to the number thereof currently registered therewith, and  \n(b) \nstate the measures being contemplated to increase the number of public Electric \nVehicle Services, including the introduction of mandatory provision thereof at \npetrol stations island-wide.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the National Land \nTransport Authority that under the present registration system, both non-plug-in hybrid and \nplug-in hybrid vehicles are recorded under the same hybrid category. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am further informed that as per recourse of the \nNLTA, as at end of February 2026, there were – \n(a) \n11,319 fully electric vehicles, including 4,820 autocycles, 15 motorcycles, 6,262 \nmotorcars and 56 buses, 88 goods vehicles, 75 double cab pickups and 3 dual \npurpose vehicles, and \n(b) \n2,209 hybrid vehicles comprising 2,208 motorcars and one dual purpose vehicle \nwhich as mentioned above, includes plug-in hybrid vehicles. \nIn view of the increasing number of electric and hybrid vehicles, the NLTA has been \nrequested to refine its data on vehicle registration so as to allow for a clear distinction \nbetween plug-in vehicles and conventional hybrid vehicles henceforth. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that as at date \nthere are 56 electric buses registered at the NLTA and which are already in operation. Most of \nthem are from the NTC. This number is expected to increase further with the addition of 60 \nmore electric buses over and above the 40 already operating, donated by the Government of \nIndia to the Government of Mauritius for use by the NTC, and further five electric buses \nalready received from the People’s Republic of China for the use by the same company, that \nis, the NTC, and for which we are thankful. \nSo, from almost zero electric buses, we will have 116 buses, out of which, 105 will be \nfor the NTC on our roads before the end of this year. So, quite a quantum leap in terms of \naddition to our roads. You will surely appreciate that.  \nFurthermore, under the Bus Modernisation Programme, a financial subsidy of up to a \nmaximum of Rs3.5 million per bus is provided to bus operators to encourage the acquisition \nof cleaner and more energy efficient buses, and this will go a long way towards encouraging \nthe electrification of the bus fleet. Support is also being mobilised under the international \nprogrammes such as the Global Environment Facility which aims at promoting low carbon \ntransport. The project will run up to September 2028 and with GEF funding, about USD5.6 \nmillion, approximately Rs260 million and my Ministry has made a request for the obtention \nof financial support for the procurement of charging facilities through photovoltaic panels so \nas to mitigate the carbon footprint in the land transport, a sizeable contributor to national \nemission of CO2. \nMadam Speaker, the measures that I have just mentioned above underline strongly the \nwill of the Government to pursue a policy of electrification in the public transport sector with \nemphasis on renewable energy. This policy will further consolidate our transition towards a \ncleaner public transport.  \nFurthermore, I am informed by the NLTA that electric vehicle charging facilities, \nwhich is part of the question, are currently available at 16 filling stations across the island. \nHowever, it is necessary to underline that a significant number of electric vehicles currently \nin use, including electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles, are charged mostly at the owners’ home \novernight due to the time it normally takes for a battery to be fully charged.  \nBesides availability at filling stations, charging facilities are also provided at major \nshopping malls, at some restaurants and at hotel premises for the convenience of owners of \nelectric or plug-in hybrid vehicles. Excluding the 16 filling stations, about 60 such facilities \nare already in operation around the island. \nMadam Speaker, my Ministry is fully conscious of the need for a wider network of \ncharging facilities to cater for the growing number of vehicles propelled fully or partly by \nelectrical energy. Any extension of such facilities will have to be carefully considered, taking \ninto account safety requirements at dispensing points, electricity grid capacity, space \nconstraints at filling stations, investment implications and costs charged to vehicles per \nkilometre hour consumed.  \nAnother factor which may have to be considered is the constant improvement in electric \nvehicle technology. Madam Speaker, the range of operation of electric vehicles has almost \ndoubled in the recent years from about an autonomy of 300 km to 500-600 km for a fully \ncharged battery. This improvement reduces considerably the requirement for a top-up at \npublic charging facility, particularly with daily kilometres, because we are a small island. We \nare 46 km in width and 65 km in length. \nTo end, Madam Speaker, nevertheless, the NLTA will hold consultations with the \nMinistry of Public Utilities, the petrol supplying companies and other relevant stakeholders in \norder to gage the necessity for the increase in the number of charging facilities, and for \ncoming up with a regulatory framework which will address issues of concern in my reply. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, you are okay? \nMr Seeburn: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Minister inform the House as \nto whether it is possible for him to impose a timeframe on the petrol stations, which are \nalready providing the service to the public service vehicles and the hybrid vehicles, so as to \nfacilitate those services? \nMr Osman Mahomed: I believe the petrol stations which are offering these facilities \nhave problems to get customers because under the Electricity Act, no one is allowed to sell \nelectricity without a permit. So, the filling stations charge it on time. When you do the \ncalculations, Madam Speaker, it is as double as what you will be charging if you are doing it \nat home. So, that is why there are not so much of uptakes at filling stations. But then, the \nregulatory framework that I mentioned in my substantive reply will address this issue. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. It was good! So, we have finished.  \nHon. Seeburn, you have another question! \nELVs – REMEDIAL MEASURES & RECYCLING FACILITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/102",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 102,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/102) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, \nin regard to old and abandoned vehicles, he will state the measures being taken to address the \nissue at the level of his Ministry, indicating whether consideration will be given for the \nsetting up of vehicle recycling facilities to encourage environmentally sustainable disposal.",
      "answer": "Mr Bhagwan: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that the Solid Waste \nManagement Division of my Ministry had commissioned a feasibility study on the setting up \nand operation of an end-of-life vehicle (ELV) recycling facility in Mauritius for the \ndepollution, dismantling and recycling of ELVs in June 2021 with the assistance of EU \nAfrica Rise operating under the European Union.  \nThe main findings of the feasibility study are, amongst others, as follows – \n(a) \nThe operation of the ELV recycling facility is feasible and sustainable. \n(b) \n There is a need to review the Road Traffic Act to enable the enforcement of \npayment of penalty fines by the polluter. \n(c) \nThe need for new regulations to cater for both total loss and abandoned vehicles. \n(d) \nThe need for relevant stakeholders, namely the Police Department, the Police de \nl’Environnement, the Ministry of Land Transport, and the National Land \nTransport Authority to review processes regarding the management of total loss \nvehicles and verification such vehicles by qualified persons. \nThe House may further wish to note that currently there is no official management \nsystem or treatment facility for the recycling of these ELVs at the level of my Ministry. It is, \ntherefore, imperative that we come up with a sustainable solution thereto in order to protect \nour population and our environment. My Ministry is working on that scope. \nMadam Speaker, following the feasibility study submitted in April 2023, multisectoral \nmeetings were held with relevant stakeholders to discuss on the way forward. The following \nproposals were made, inter alia – \n(i) \nthe preparation of regulations by the Solid Waste Management Division of my \nMinistry for the use of license for the setting up and operation of recycling \nfacility for the depollution and recycling of ELVs; \n(ii) \ninvitation by the Solid Waste Management Division to potential promoters to set \nup and operate licensed recycling facilities for ELVs, and \n(iii) amendment to existing regulations by the Ministry of Land Transport and \npreparation of regulation to channel the ELVs towards the licensed recycling \nfacilities. \nThe House may wish to note that with a view to encouraging environmentally \nsustainable management of ELVs, several actions have already been initiated by my Ministry \nand relevant stakeholders. The Solid Waste Management Division has prepared draft \nregulations for the licensing of a recycling facility for the depollution and recycling, \ntreatment of ELVs. On the other hand, the Ministry of Land Transport has prepared a draft \nregulation to channel the ELVs to recycling treatment facilities.  \nThe Ministry of Land Transport has informed that they are working actively on the \ndraft Road Traffic (Disposal of Abandoned and Salvaged Motor Vehicles) Regulations 2026 \nin consultation with my Ministry. The proposed legislation aims to establish a comprehensive \nframework for the identification, management and disposal of abandoned vehicles as well as \nvehicles classified as total loss.  \nAbandoned vehicles are not only an eyesore, but represent a threat to the environment \nin view of the nuisances and pollution they can cause. As at to date, around 58 abandoned \nvehicles have been moved to Fort George, 108 to the La Laura Transfer Station by the Police \nDepartment, with the assistance of the Police de l’Environnement. It is expected that the \nforthcoming regulatory framework will lay the groundwork for more structured and \nenvironmentally sound material recovery practices, facilitating the development of \nappropriate vehicle dispensing and recycling mechanisms in line with national sustainability \nobjectives. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. First, hon. Seeburn. Then, you. \nMr Seeburn: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I thank the hon. Minister. Can the hon. \nMinister also consider the possibility of providing financial incentives to the owners who \nwant to dispose their vehicles in an environmentally friendly manner once the setting up of \nthe recycling vehicle facility is put in place? \nMr Bhagwan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. We are working in that direction with all \nthe parties concerned. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Hon. Lobine! \nMr Lobine: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister whether there is \na comprehensive study with regard to the number of end-of-life vehicles that we have around \nthe island as at now? It is scattered all around the island, but we do not have a specific survey \nfor that. \nMr Bhagwan: The survey is in process. I can assure the hon. Member. This is a real \nproblem. It is an eyesore. So, we are working, not only by ourselves, but along with the local \nauthorities. \nMadam Speaker: I am just laughing because we know where to find these vehicles in \nRose Hill. Yes! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister, until the \nsetting up of a recycling unit which will obviously take time, will his Ministry consider \nhaving a dedicated compound in certain areas of the country? Because these abandoned and \nold cars are eyesores, now being used as little drug dens and sometimes for cheap \nprostitution. \nMr Bhagwan: I do agree with my good friend. It is a real problem. We are working \nwith the Police. We have been using the La Laura Centre and also a site at Fort George with \nthe help of the Police. This is a real problem and I think that any suggestion from any hon. \nMember is most welcomed. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Let’s hope that the eyesores will go. Gradually, we will get \nrid of these eyesores. \nMr Beechook, yes! You want to share the joke? \nMr Beechook: No, sorry Madam. B/103, please! \nTOURIST ENTERPRISE LICENSE – NIGHTCLUBS’ OPERATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/103",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 103,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. B/103) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil)  asked the \nMinister of Tourism whether, in regard to the Tourist Enterprise License, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Tourism Authority, information as to whether it is in \npresence of representations to the effect that some holders thereof are operating as nightclubs \nand, if so, indicate whether appropriate actions will be taken in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection (Mr M. Yeung Sik Yuen): \nMadam Speaker, with your permission, I shall reply to this PQ. \nI am informed by the Tourism Authority that following inspections carried out by its \nMonitoring and Compliance Unit from January to March 2026 – \n(a) \n25 contraventions have been issued for non-compliance to conditions of licenses \nnamely – \n(i) \nOperation hours; \n(ii) \nPermitted noise level, and \n(iii) Maximum number of persons at a time, amongst others. \n(b) \n1 entity SC Company Ltd based in Ebene which holds a valid license to operate \nas a pub was carrying out night club activities without having the appropriate \nTourist Enterprise License, was booked on 14 March 2026; \n(c) \nAnother company BPE Ltd based in Quatre Bornes which was advertising and \noperating as pub without holding the appropriate Tourist Enterprise License was \nbooked on 14 March 2026, and \n(d) \nAnother restaurant, B Ltd at Grand Baie, was operating as pub, night club without \nappropriate license, was booked on 22 March 2026. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that severe actions have been taken by the Tourism \nAuthority against these three companies. On 23 March 2026, BPE Ltd was issued with a \nprovisional closing down order and the other two were instructed to show cause as to why \ntheir respective licenses should not be suspended. Actions are being contemplated against \nother operators to ensure that activities are undertaken in a sustainable manner. In line with \nthe legislation and according to guidelines and conditions to license while assuring safety and \nsecurity for both tourists and Mauritians.  \nThe Tourism Authority will continue to carry out regular inspections together with the \nMauritius Police Force and other relevant Authorities to ensure strict compliance with \nlicensing conditions and public safety regulations are adhered to.  \nI must point out, Madam Speaker, that the inspections carried out by the Monitoring \nand Compliance Unit of the Tourism Authority are done jointly with representatives of other \ninstitutions, including the Police du Tourisme, the Police de l’Environnement, the Emergency \nResponse Service, La Brigade des Mineurs, the National Coastguard, the Sanitary Health \nInspection Division of the Ministry of Health and Wellness, and the Beach Authority. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to assure the hon. Member that the Ministry of Tourism and the \nTourism Authority are doing their utmost to reinforce enforcement mechanism so as to ensure \nthat public order and our tourism sector are safeguarded. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, Mr Beechook! \nMr Beechook: Yes, Madam Speaker, I thank the Acting hon. Minister of Tourism for \nthis comprehensive reply. \nHowever, is the hon. Minister aware that pubs are not allowed to run dance floors and \nrun concerts with amplified equipment? Is the hon. Minister aware that it is currently the \npractice that pubs run as night clubs outside permitted hours generating all sorts of hazards \nwhich are: high level of alcohol, traffic issues and noise pollution? \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: I am not aware but I will ask the Tourism Authority to take \nappropriate actions. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes, he won’t be aware! \nMr Beechook: Will the hon. Minister agree that very often the fines that are imposed to \nthese pubs that operate as night club are, maybe hundred or thousand times lesser than the \namount of revenue that they generate on one particular day and don’t act as a deterrent with \nregard to those illegal activities? \nMadam Speaker: You know hon. Minister? \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: As I am not the substantive Minister, I will talk to the substantive \nMinister on it. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, logically what you want is for the law… \nMr Beechook: Last question! Is the hon. Minister ready to meet with the stakeholders \nof this industry pour mettre de l’ordre in this bazaar that is operating in this sector? \nMadam Speaker: Il va passer le message. \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: I am ready to meet them if necessary. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, alright! I think the message has gone.  \nOkay, now I am calling on the Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet, Mr \nRookny! \nWATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT – ADEQUATE CAPTURE, STORAGE \n& DISTRIBUTION – KEY PROJECTS & TOTAL INVESTMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/104",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 104,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/104) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the country’s water resources \nmanagement, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Water Resources Unit, \ninformation as to whether a comprehensive roadmap has been established to ensure the \nadequate capture, storage and distribution of water for both potable and irrigation purposes \nand, if so – \n(a)  give details thereof, including timelines and key projects to be implemented, and  \n(b)  indicate the total investment required to implement same and the sources of \nfunding identified.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, mon ministère dispose d'un plan directeur pour \nla gestion intégrée des ressources en eau à Maurice. Le plan directeur définit la feuille de \nroute pour la mobilisation, le stockage et la distribution de l'eau à l'horizon de 2050. Il \nprésente la planification stratégique des projets, tels que la construction de nouveaux \nbarrages, la réhabilitation ou l'agrandissement des barrages existants, la construction de prises \nd'eau directes dans les rivières ou en réservoirs, et le forage des puits. Ces projets sont mis en \nœuvre en fonction des priorités et des financements disponibles. \nMadame la présidente, face à la sécheresse sans précédent que connaît le pays depuis \n2024 en particulier, mon ministère a élaboré un plan Marshall, approuvé par le Cabinet en \noctobre 2025, l’année dernière. Ce plan définit la stratégie du ministère pour mobiliser des \nressources en eau supplémentaires court et à moyen terme. Le plan Marshall repose sur six \npiliers stratégiques – \nLe premier, le développement actif des eaux souterraines. Le plan prévoit en priorité le \nforage d'une vingtaine de puits supplémentaires au cours des trois prochaines années. Il est à \nnoter que depuis novembre 2025, donc l’année dernière, huit nouveaux puits ont été forés, \npermettant d'injecter 24,800 m³ par jour d’eau supplémentaire dans le réseau. Le coût, ça va \ncouter autour de R263 millions étalé sur plusieurs années. \nPilier deux - Expansion des eaux de surface. Le déploiement des systèmes de traitement \ndécentralisés, les CPF, qu’on met dans les rivières pour pomper l’eau, permettant la \npurification de l'eau sur les sites et approvisionnement en eau réparti et résilient, constitue un \nautre volet du plan Marshall. Depuis octobre 2025, donc l’année dernière, la CWA a installé 7 \nCPF et prélève environ 15,500 m³ d’eau supplémentaires chaque jour pour alimenter \nplusieurs régions de l'île. \nLa CWA a lancé un appel d'offres, l’année dernière, pour l'installation de 15 CPF \nsupplémentaires à proximité de cours d'eau, donc des rivières et des lacs. La procédure \nd'acquisition est en cours auprès du CPB. Le projet, financé par le gouvernement, est estimé à \nR 310 millions sur plusieurs années encore une fois. \n Troisième pilier – le plan Marshall préconise l'utilisation de l’eau hydroélectrique, \nl’eau que le CEB utilise pour produire l’électricité. Donc nous allons encore pomper cette eau \nlà pour remettre sur le réseau. Pour augmenter l'approvisionnement en eau, il est prévu de \nprélever et traiter 4,000 m³ par jour d'eau du barrage de Sans Souci. Cela va couter autour de \nR 40 millions.  \nQuatrième pilier – le plan propose également l'utilisation des eaux usées (l’eau de \nWaste water) pour l'irrigation des cultures de la canne à sucre.  \nL'Association des usagers du canal Magenta, en collaboration avec la Chambre \nd'agriculture, a déjà manifesté son intention d'utiliser quotidiennement environ 30,000 m³ \nd'eaux usées traitées de la station de Saint-Martin. Nous utilisons déjà l’eau traité pour Mon \nChoisy, dans la région du nord pour l'irrigation.   \nCinquième pilier, Madame la présidente, le dessalement. Nous étudions actuellement \nun projet de dessalement à moyen et court terme des usines de dessalement. Ainsi, l’appel à \nmanifestation ; Expression of Interest, pour la réalisation d'une étude de faisabilité en vue de \nla mise en place d'une usine de dessalement de 50 000 m³ / jour dans le nord – que pour le \nnord.  \nDonc, cela a été lancé le 5 septembre de l’année dernière, de 2025, à l'échelle \ninternationale par mon ministère. La date limite de dépôt des candidatures a été fixée au 14 \nnovembre de l’année dernière. 14 candidatures ont été reçues et évaluées. À l'issue de cette \nprocédure, un appel d'offres sera lancé d'ici la fin de ce mois pour une étude de faisabilité.  \nJ’ai discuté aussi je peux dire avec les responsables du gouvernement marocain \nconcernant le dessalement. Ils sont extrêmement avancés dans ce secteur. Donc, pour un \nprojet de dessalement de 50 000 m³ / par jour. J’ai aussi l’intention d’aller voir à Rodrigues le \nprojet de dessalement – je crois que c’est à Pointe Coton, qui est en construction.  \nSixième pilier six, Madame la présidente, on veut aussi dévier l’eaux des rivières qui se \nperdent à la mer. Le plan propose l'étude et la construction éventuelle afin de retenir les eaux \nde surface en amont qui, autrement, se déversaient dans la mer. Dans un premier temps, il est \nprévu de détourner l'eau de la rivière Eau Bleue vers le réservoir de Midlands.  \nPar ailleurs, afin d'améliorer, il n’y a pas que construire pour le stockage mais il faudra \naussi réparer les fuites, les pertes que nous avons dans le réseau parce que plus de 60% de \nl’eau que nous mettons sur le réseau, se perde. Vous réalisez ! \nDonc, par ailleurs, afin d'améliorer la gestion des pertes, le gouvernement a obtenu un \nprêt de R2,9 milliards du gouvernement indienne, destiné au remplacement de quelques 114 \nkm des tuyaux pour 13 régions du pays.  \nEnfin, Madame la présidente, pour remédier durablement au pénurie d'eau chronique \ndans le sud – pas chez vous monsieur l’honorable membre – mais dans le sud du pays, la \nconstruction du barrage de Rivière des Anguilles a été lancée. Donc, la construction va \ncommencer en Novembre/Décembre de cette année-ci. \nDonc, cela va aider énormément la région du sud mais cela va permettre aussi à la \nCWA, à la Water Resources Commission de se servir de l’eau que nous distribuons \nactuellement dans le sud de servir pour d’autre régions. Donc, cela aura un double effet.  \nMerci, Madame la présidente.  \nMr Rookny: Madame la présidente, malgré l’ingestion de l’additionnelle 24,000 m³ \nd’eaux dans nos réseaux, ma circonscription – la circonscription numéro 5 et la \ncirconscription numéro 6 ont fait face à un manque d’eau sans précèdent, même pire que les \n10 années précédentes – que ce soit pour l’eau potable ou l’eau qu’on utilise pour l’irrigation. \nQuelle en a été la cause et pourquoi est-ce que certaines régions continuent à faire un tel \nmanque ? \nMr Assirvaden : Je dois préciser, Madame la présidente, qu’il n’y a pas que la \ncirconscription de l’honorable membre. Le nord en particulier a été affecté et je dirai que le \nréservoir de la Nicolière, c’est le réservoir qui alimente la région du nord et qui est utilisé du \ncôté domestique et agricole.  \nCe que nous faisons bien souvent, Madame la présidente, c’est que nous distribuons \nl’eau par la gravité. Donc, il faudra remplir les réservoirs pour que l’eau descende chez \ncertaines personnes.  \nDeuxième chose, c’est que nous faisons face à une sècheresse. Le mois de février a été \nle mois le plus sec depuis 104 ans, vous réalisez ! Donc, il nous faut prendre de l’eau de \nMidlands pour remplir le réservoir de la Nicolière qui desservit le nord. Une chose.  \nDeuxièmement, nous avons un problème de pression sur le réseau. Vous savez, les \ntuyaux que nous avons datent de 50-60 ans, une chose. Autre chose c’est que quand nous \navons dépensé le R70 millions de Pipe Replacement Programme dans le temps, nous n’avons \nrien reçu en termes de improvement sur les pertes. Si nous mettons trop de pression sur les \nréseaux – les réseaux s’explosent. Si nous ne mettons pas suffisamment de pression sur les \nréseaux – les gens n’arrivent pas à avoir l’eaux – certaines personnes qui vivent en hauteur.  \nJe peux dire que le dessalement va aider. C’est pour cette raison que nous avons décidé \nde commencer avec une station de dessalement dans le nord parce que dans le nord, nous \navons principalement à satisfaire les clients domestiques mais aussi l’agriculture. Si vous \ndonnez trop aux résidentiels, le secteur agricole se plaigne – on n’a pas arrêté l’irrigation des \nlégumes malgré la sécheresse.  \nJe peux comprendre et je suis d’accord avec l’honorable membre que dans le nord, nous \nfaisons face actuellement à ce souci. C’est pour cette raison que dans le plan Marshall, nous \navons donné plus de priorité au nord en termes de forage, en termes de CPF pour augmenter \nla capacité de distribution. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Rookny. \nMr Rookny: Madame la présidente, je remercie l’honorable ministre et le Cabinet en \ngénéral pour l’effort consenti pour résoudre ce problème-là. Je voudrais savoir dans combien \nde temps les consommateurs vont ressentir un improvement ? \nMr Assirvaden : C’est difficile de dire. Malheureusement, celui qui avait promis de \nl’eau 24/7 n’est pas là, vous réalisez. Donc, je peux dire que nous avons un plan Marshall à \ncourt, moyen et long terme. L’honorable membre doit sûrement savoir que je parle ici des \nprojets de plusieurs milliard de roupies. Le projet de dessalement, je me bats pour qu’on \npuisse avoir un G-to-G ; entre gouvernement et gouvernement pour financer ce genre de \nprojet.  \nJe vais être franc. Du jour au lendemain, on ne pourra pas dire que le nord va être \nsatisfait de la distribution mais nous faisons le maximum possible pour augmenter la capacité. \nOn fait tous en termes de CPF, en termes de pompage dans les rivières, en termes de forage, \nen termes de dessalement mais il faudra malheureusement … \nLà le plan Marshall va permettre de mobiliser 150,000 m³ dans les années à venir – \n150,000 m³ supplémentaire en ajoutant le Riviere des Anguilles Dam. Donc, pour vous dire \nque ce n’est pas quelque chose que du jour au lendemain, on pourra satisfaire. Il nous faut \nimpérativement renouveler les tuyaux que nous avons parce que vous réalisez que 100 m³ \nd’eaux que nous mettons sur le réseau, 62 m³ part et que 40 m³ arrive chez vous. Donc, il \nfaudra mettre le double pour que vous puissiez satisfaire les régions.  \nMadam Speaker: Bonne chance! Yes, Mr Lobine. \nMr Lobine: May I ask the hon. Minister with regard to this Marshall plan being put in \nplace, will the hon. Minister consider the already comprehensive plan prepared by the \nSingaporean government, a G-to-G done way back in 2013, for the establishment of a water \nauthority but also, there was a clear roadmap that unfortunately the previous government \ndidn’t adhere to? Will he consider this comprehensive document that is still there at the \nMinistry? \nMr Assirvaden: Je dois dire que mon ministère discute actuellement avec les \nresponsables de Singapour. Ils étaient à Maurice il y a quelques temps de cela et on a eu pas \nmal de rencontres. Je peux dire que le plan Marshall a été élaboré en collaboration avec les \nSingapouriens. \nMadam Speaker: Très bien. Mr A. Duval.  \nMr A. Duval: Puis-je demander à l’honorable ministre qu’en est-il des projets \nimmobiliers dans la région du nord qui ont dû opter pour ne pas être connectés au réseau \nd’eau pour pouvoir avoir leurs permis de construction ? Y- a-t-il un plan pour eux pour les \nreconnecter dans la durée ? \nA ma connaissance, il y a pas mal de projets immobiliers qui sont complètement en \ndehors du réseau de la CWA et qui doivent s’approvisionner en privé et on parle des biens \nimmobiliers qui sont vendus à des millions des dollars, d’euros, etc…Quel est le plan pour \neux ? \nMr Assirvaden: Je dois dire que l’honorable Dr. Ms Thannoo n’est pas là. Elle m’avait \nfait visiter dans la circonscription numéro 8, je me rappel, un morcellement qui était \nmalheureusement en dehors du réseau et on essaye de faire le nécessaire. Je dois dire qu’il y \ndes réseaux qui sont éloignés. Par exemple, je ne sais pas de quel morcellement que \nl’honorable membre parle aujourd’hui…   \nMr A. Duval : Plusieurs. \nMr Assirvaden : Plusieurs. Vous savez le problème c’est que la CWA n’a plus un sou. \nIl faut bien le dire. La CWA n’a plus un sou. Je l’ai dit à plusieurs reprises, je ne vais pas me \nrépéter ici mais nous avons un plan d’ensemble pour essayer de raccorder.  \nVous savez, bien souvent, les réservoirs que nous avons suffisent pour alimenter une \nrégion. Mais quand la région se développe avec des dizaines et d’autres développements aux \nalentours, il nous faut impérativement upgrade nos réservoirs et notre réseau.  \nC’est la même chose. Un tuyau de cette grosseur peut alimenter dix maisons, mais si \nvous avez vingt maisons, il faudra redoubler. Donc, changer les tuyaux. Donc, nous avons \naussi un projet pour essayer de raccorder. Mais bien souvent, certains morcellements sont \nvendus alors que, de par la loi, ils sont obligés de mettre le réseau électrique et le réseau \nd’eau. Mais malheureusement, certains promoteurs ne font pas le cas. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Ramkalawon! \nMr Ramkalawon: Yes. Can the hon. Minister state whether his Ministry is \nencouraging firms producing drinking water from air, that is, atmospheric water generation? \nMr Assirvaden: Toutes les propositions sont les bienvenues. Si l’honorable membre a \ndes propositions, c’est le bienvenu au sein du ministère. \nMadam Speaker: Très bien! Good?  \nNow, hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nFÉDÉRATION MAURICIENNE DE JUDO – CLUBS AFFILIATION – SPORTS \nARBITRATION TRIBUNAL RULING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/105",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 105,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/105) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether in regard to the eighteen clubs seeking affiliation to \nthe Federation Mauricienne de Judo, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information \nas to where matters stand, indicating – \n(a) \nthe ruling of the Sports Arbitration Tribunal in relation thereto, and \n(b) \nwhether any decision has been taken pertaining to the recognition thereof and, if \nnot, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, I would like to refer the House to my reply to PQ \nB/220 at our Sitting on 25 March 2025 wherein I had stated that while I am fully prepared to \nreport on matters pertaining to sport federation in relation to the obligations under the Sports \nAct 2016, it will not be appropriate to report on the internal affairs.  \nIt is to be highlighted that the National Sports Federations are autonomous bodies. As \nsuch, affiliation of sports clubs thereto is an internal matter of the respective federation. As \nsuch, any queries regarding such matters should normally be addressed to the federation \nconcerned.  \nMadam Speaker, I can, however, inform the House on actions taken at the level of my \nMinistry to find a lasting solution to this long-standing dispute between the federation and \nsome clubs seeking affiliation with it. Since January 2025, three reconciliation meetings have \nbeen held between the contesting parties and the federation without success.  \nAfter proactive discussion, in September 2025, the federation finally agreed to the \nfinalisation and formalisation of the affiliation criteria following which, a process was \ninitiated. \nI am informed by the federation that 13 – and not 18 clubs – had applied for affiliation \nwith the Fédération Mauricienne de Judo. Out of these 13, six clubs had obtained official \nrecognition from the federation. I am given to understand that the affiliation process is \nongoing since the federation has informed that one of the clubs that has not been retained for \naffiliation has not fulfilled the criteria. The status will be considered at the forthcoming \nannual general meeting scheduled for 21st of this month. \nI wish to underline that this partial resolution represents a positive development. The \nonly pending cases is that of the Cassis Fraternel Judo Club. I understand that it is the general \nassembly of the federation that has refused the affiliation of the said club on various grounds. \nI am further informed that while Cassis Fraternel Judo Club had previously brought a case \nbefore the Sports Arbitration Tribunal regarding affiliation matters, it has withdrawn the case \nitself on 31 July 2025. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that my Ministry, keeping in mind the \nautonomous stages of the sport federation, remains fully attentive to the situation the best \ninterests of all Judokas, and has advised the federation to continue guiding the non-affiliated \nclubs in addressing any identified shortcomings so that they may fulfil the required criteria \nfor future affiliation. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. L’honorable ministre sera, je pense, \nd’accord que cette situation dure depuis des années. Il a parlé dans sa réponse, Madame la \nprésidente, de six clubs qui ont récemment été affiliés. D’après mes informations, ces six \nclubs ne font pas partie des clubs qui ont été pénalisés durant ces dernières années. \nMadam Speaker: No statement! \nMr Quirin:. Je viens à ma question. Peut-on savoir, dans le cas du judo – on sait très \nbien que l’honorable ministre a appliqué la guillotine en ce qui concerne le badminton –, \npourquoi, en ce qui concerne cette fédération, une situation qui perdure depuis des années, \nqui pénalise nos judokas et judokates depuis des années – il parle d’autonomie, oui–, mais \npourquoi dans le cas de cette fédération, il n’a pas appliqué la guillotine qui aurait dû être \nappliquée depuis pas mal de temps ? Pour permettre justement à cette fédération de se rendre \ncompte qu’on ne peut pas continuellement, pour je ne sais quelle raison, conflit ou autre, \npénaliser des athlètes alors qu’ils font de leur mieux pour faire flotter le quadricolore. \nPourquoi a-t-on attendu tout ce temps ? \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister! \nMr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, the hon. Member will surely know that Section 9 \n(9) in the Sports Act is not what we can use here for judo. We have applied it for another \nfederation because they do not meet the criteria. They did not respect the Sports Act. But here \nI ask the hon. Member: give me one point where I can apply what you said ‘guillotine’ for \nthat federation. I am willing to do it if you give the reason. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Why do you not deal with this nicely afterwards? You want \nto?  \n(Interruptions) \nI do not… \nHon. Members: Hmmm! \n Mr Quirin: Je ne vais pas polémiquer. Je vais simplement dire à l’honorable ministre \nque le monde sportif mauricien attend avec impatience que… \nMadam Speaker: Vous faites des déclarations ! \nMr Quirin: …ce problème soit réglé. \nMadam Speaker: On a entendu! On vous a entendu ! \nMr Quirin: Voilà ! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Simplement, on ne peut pas… \nMr Nagalingum: Hon. Member, I fully agree with you on that issue. I am the person \nwho is going to be very fair and honest if the Cassis Fraternel got the affiliation. \nMr Quirin: All of them! \nMadam Speaker: Je n’arrive pas à bien suivre.  \nYour next question! This one is on badminton. \nASSOCIATION MAURICIENNE DE BADMINTON – MANAGING \nCOMMITTEE DISSOLUTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/106",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 106,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/106) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the Managing Committee of the \nAssociation Mauricienne de Badminton, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to why his Ministry dissolved same on 10 March 2026.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, being given that this question requires a long \nanswer, I am tabling, with your permission, the chronology of events that have led to the \ndecision to dissolve the managing committee of the Mauritius Badminton Association (MBA) \non 10 March 2026. \nIt was the culmination of a prolonged period of instability in governance, failures, and \nrepeated complaints from athletes, parents and former members of the MBA. The decision \ntaken by my Ministry – it has acted in the broader public interests and in line with its \nresponsibility to ensure that the National Sports Federation operates in accordance with the \nprinciples of good governance, transparency, accountability and the proper protection of \nathletes. \nIn accordance with Section 9(9)(c)(ii) of the Sports Act 2016, my Ministry has initiated \nconsultations with the Mauritius Olympic Committee with a view to appointing a temporary \ncommittee. My Ministry considered this intervention to be essential in order to protect the \nintegrity of the sport and safeguard the interests of all affiliated clubs, athletes and \nstakeholders within the badminton community. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that I had a meeting with the president of \nthe MOC on Wednesday 18 March 2026. In a correspondence dated 18 March 2026, he has \ninformed my Ministry that he had and urgent executive committee meeting to discuss the \nmatter. \nWe were further informed that the MOC had referred the matter to the legal department \nof the International Olympic Committee for advice. \nMadam Speaker, I wish also to inform the House that communication has also been \nestablished with the Badminton World Federation, governing body for the sports of \nbadminton through its legal and governance department. The MBA is a member of the \nBadminton World Federation. The latter has requested the Ministry to share with them the \ndetailed ground for the dissolution of the Managing Committee. \nThe BWF informed that in principle its constitution protects member association \nagainst government interference, that it does understand that such intervention is sometimes \nnecessary to put the association back on the right track. \nMadam Speaker, my Ministry remains committed to working with all relevant parties to \nensure a smooth transition and to restore stability, transparency and good governance within \nthe sport of badminton in Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker : Yes. \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. Je dois faire ressortir que le badminton est \nune discipline qui régulièrement fait honneur au pays et cela ne date pas d’aujourd’hui. Donc, \nl’honorable ministre peut-il confirmer si son ministère a eu des consultations préalables avec \nl’Association mauricienne de badminton, pas le Comité olympique mauricien, avant la \ndissolution de son comité directeur et, si tel est le cas, de bien vouloir nous donner les dates ?  \nMr Nagalingum: No, I had no such meeting with the Federation of Badminton but the \ncharges I have stated in my reply are enough to take the necessary actions. So, there was no \nmeeting. \nMadam Speaker: It is not the federation, it is association. \nMr Quirin: C’est une fédération. \nMr Nagalingum: C’est une fédération. \nMadam Speaker : On n’appelle pas cela fédération, d’accord ! \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente, je peux bien comprendre la réponse de l’honorable \nministre mais je crois que la moindre des choses avant d’appliquer la sanction suprême, parce \nque comme il l’a dit dans sa réponse à ma question précédente, la section 9(9)(c), on \nl’applique en dernier recours, effectivement. Et là, ma question est pourquoi n’y a-t-il pas, je \nne suis pas en train de défendre la fédération, je ne suis pas en train de remettre en question \nles… \nMadam Speaker : Question ! Ne vous expliquez pas, posez-lui la question !  \nMr Quirin: … les reproches qui sont adressés à cette fédération, je demande \nsimplement pourquoi l’honorable ministre et son ministère n’ont pas jugé bon de rencontrer, \nde les mettre devant les faits, par rapport à tout ce qui est reproché, il a fait sortir un \ncommuniqué récemment, il l’a dit. Pourquoi, quand il parle d’autonomie, pourquoi n’a-t-il \npas jugé bon de rencontrer ces personnes ? \nMadam Speaker: Short and sweet. Très simple. \nMr Nagalingum: I have already replied to that question, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker : Il ne va pas répondre plus que cela. Oui, vous ne pouvez pas \nl’obliger. \nMr Quirin: Je ne l’oblige pas mais on prend connaissance de ce qu’il dit. Merci. \nMadam Speaker: On note. Okay! Next question. We have finished with badminton. \nNow, hon. First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne Longue! \nYOUTHS – CYBER INCIDENTS – NEW LEGISLATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/107",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 107,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/107) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation \nwhether, in regard to the protection of the youth from cyberbullying, cyberviolence, online \nsuicide and sextorsions, he will state if consideration is being given for the introduction of \nnew legislation in relation thereto and, if so, indicate where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: Madam Speaker, I would like to, first, thank the hon. Member for this \nquestion. As I had already indicated in my reply PQ B/135 on 02 December 2025, there has \nbeen a sharp increase in online harms over recent years particularly affecting youths. \nWith your permission, Madam Speaker, I would like to provide a very quick update on \nthe numbers. Shall I? \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nDr. Ramtohul: So, based on incidents reported by the public through the MAUCORS \n(Mauritian Cybercrime Online Reporting System) between January 26 to date, there have \nbeen 1727 cyber incidents which implies an average of 21 cases per day out of which 275 \ncases referred to cyber bullying and 523 to online harassment. \nWhat is important to note here is that 78 of those victims are aged between 11 and 18 \nand most of them are females. This reflects an increase compared to previous years and the \nnumbers were given in my response of December 2025. \nMadam Speaker, there are 3 legislations that are directly concerned with this issue. It is \nthe Children’s Act 2020, the Cybersecurity and Cybercrime Act 2021 and the ICT Act as \nwell. \nThe Children’s Act 2020 explicitly criminalises bullying including through digital \nmeans and provides for severe penalties where harm is caused to child under 18. \nThe Cybersecurity and Cybercrime Act 2021 provides for offences relating to cyber \nbullying, online harassment, exploitation and other forms of cyber abuse, with stringent \nactions, penalties for all ages. \nHowever, crimes are still on the increase. This implies that there are fundamental \nchallenges either with the law or with its implementation or with both. \nHowever, we are exploring all avenues. So, with regard to the law, it has not followed \nthe technological evolution. For example, with AI coming into the digital landscape, it has \nworsened matters and, lately, generative AI has also been used in causing harm and bullying \nto people and to children as well mainly through fake profiles. \nWhile our legislations, the ICT Act and the Cybersecurity and Cybercrime Act, allow \nfor anonymous accounts but it allows for those that are used without causing harm, but most \nof them have been created and they are tainted orange and they create harm and we all know \nwho they are. \nHowever, there has to be a scientific way of establishing what are the identities of those \npeople and we are working with the Government of India to actually seek help to establish a \nscientific way of identifying those perpetrators. \nNow, the element of AI is merely one dimension but amendments also need to be \nbrought to the Children’s Act 2020 because there are new online harms that have come into \nthe picture. \nAmendments will also need to consider, as we said, the new online harms but very \nimportantly shifting the onus of the lawfulness of the contents to the platform providers and \nmy Office is in touch with Attorney General’s Office in order to now engage the platform \nproviders, those companies, and we can mention those companies because it is public \nknowledge, it is META and it is Google, as well. \nNow, with regard to the implementation dimension, the lack of verified identities is \nhindering the process of identifying the perpetrators of cybercrimes. Therefore, consideration \nis being given not only to amend existing legislations, as I mentioned, but also to forecast or \nforesee implementation challenges. \nThe Internet amendments will address verification of identities and also authentication \nor authenticity of sensitive AI generated materials. We see a lot of AI videos that are causing \nharm. \nToday, we do not have the means to assess whether the AI generated objects are \ngenuine or they are actually AI generated and there also need to be obligations on the author \nto specify that this content is AI generated. \nNow, these are some provisions that are being considered in the amendments that we \nare bringing to the law. As the hon. Prime Minister mentioned this morning, we are working \nwith the Central Government of India to leverage their expertise in establishing the process \nand technologies as well that will help identify the perpetrators and bring them to justice. \nIn May 2025, the Cabinet gave approval for the aforesaid amendments and we are \nalready actively working with the State Office Law Office to finalise the draft at hand.  \nMadam Speaker, I would like to mention, and I will finish my answer with this, that the \ninitiative of my Ministry generated the Child Online Protection Scheme or measure which \nwas implemented by the mobile network operators. \nSo far, we have had a decent uptake and adoption of child online protection but our \nwork is mainly on mobile phone, for accessing social media. The phase two is in preparation \nand it will be applicable to Wi-Fi and routers at home so that parents will have better control \nover the contents that are being accessed by their children. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much, hon. Minister. Yes? \nMs Savabaddy: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I have two supplementaries. Will the \nhon. Minister agree with me with the urgency of the matter and is he following international \ntrends from modern and democratic countries around the world on this very issue, same as \nAustralia and France in delaying access to social media for youth under a certain age? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister? \nDr. Ramtohul: Thank you, hon. Member for this supplementary and Madam Speaker, \nas a responsible Government, we care for our children and we also understand that they \nrepresent the future. I am also a father. So, we understand the challenges that parents are \nfacing. We have also seen the types of incidents that our children have faced, in some cases \nthere have been loss of lives as well. So, yes indeed, we are considering all options and we \nwill very soon reach out to the Cabinet for a decision on the way forward. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, second! \nMs Savabaddy: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Minister indicate whether \nconsideration is being given to the deployment of technical filtering mechanisms, similar to \nthose currently used in certain jurisdictions to combat child sexual abuse material in order to \nlimit or block access to online content that has been formally reported and verified as \ncyberbullying, harassment or abusive material targeting individuals, particularly minors and \nyoung persons? Thank you. \nDr. Ramtohul: Thank you, hon. Member. I believe that the measures that we need to \napply do not have to be only technical. Why? Because a child can always have access to the \nparent’s phone. A child can always declare his or her age as being above 18 as compared to \nbeing below 16 or 13 because today, children below 13 are not actually accepted on social \nmedia platforms, on most of them but they are still doing it. Therefore, the measures, yes, on \nthe one hand they need to be technical and we will not leave any stones unturned to consider \nthe technical measures within the respect of the Constitution and we will also address \nmeasures such as sensitisation of parents in order to clean up the digital space. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: I am sorry, I did not get you. I should not get too involved but I \nwould like to know more about the Constitution. I think nobody understood really. Which \nrespect do you mean? Tell me, I do not want to tell you this… \nDr. Ramtohul: It is the privacy of correspondents, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nDr. Ramtohul: Yes. So, when we talk about filtering, this implies that we will need to \nread the data ahead of the actual correspondent reading the data and reading the data between \ntwo correspondents compromises the privacy of that correspondence, and the Constitution \nguarantees the right to privacy of correspondence. So, whatever we will do, we will do within \nthe respect of the Constitution. \nMadam Speaker: Including for children? \nDr. Ramtohul: Including for children. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, okay. \nMr A. Duval: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister, in order to \ncombat fake profiles which bring with them all the associated evils that we know, is the \nGovernment prepared to consider first of all, mandatory ID verification for those who are 18 \nand above, and as well parental ID verification for those who are aged under 18 and if there \nwill be an age limit for the use of social media in Mauritius like is being done in the EU and \nin all the developed countries in the world there is this mouvance? \nMadam Speaker: Question has already been put, I think. Yes, part of that question has \nalready been answered. \nDr. Ramtohul: Yes, thank you hon. Member. Yes, in my response I did indicate that the \nlack of verified identities is hindering the process of bringing those people to justice. We will \nimplement the verification of identities and parents should also assume their responsibilities \nso that they do not actually allow their children who are under a certain age, as per their own \npolicies that they implement at home – because everybody has his or her own policies – but \nthe Government will have its own set of policies as well which parents will need to \nimplement. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, just to clarify. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nMr A. Duval: For the sake of clarity, hon. Minister, when you say that we will be \nmoving for identity verification, do we understand that the mainstream social medias like \nFacebook and others will take down all profiles that do not meet the identity verification \ncriteria? \nDr. Ramtohul: Well, I am not really sure what you are pointing at because on the one \nhand, you are stating that we should do it, on the other, you are raising a problem that could \nactually result out of this action. \nMr A. Duval: I am not against it. I am telling you it should happen. We should take \ndown all the unverified accounts. \nDr. Ramtohul: Yes, the aim is for us to have profiles that are verified. So, in the \nprocess of implementing that, if it implies that all existing profiles will need to be verified \nand those that are fake profiles will need to be taken down, so be it. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, okay. \nMs Savabaddy: Thank you so much. Can I ask the hon. Minister if he can provide the \nnumber of convictions and imprisonment terms secured, imposed against offenders in the last \nfive years or so? Thank you. \nDr. Ramtohul: Thank you, hon. Member. I would not have the numbers with me at the \nmoment but I surely will table it for you. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Next one is hon. Beejan! \nNATIONAL FRAMEWORK – SPORTS FACILITIES INTEGRATION – JOINT \nACTION PLAN  \n\n80",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/108",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 108,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/108) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’ Or) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the collaboration between his Ministry \nand local district councils for integrating sports facilities into a national framework, he will \nstate the specific mechanisms and outcomes thereof, including any joint action plan or \nmemorandum of understanding established, and the number of tournaments, particularly \nfootball, volleyball and basketball, organized in Constituency No. 6 since January 2025 to \ndate.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, I wish to highlight that despite the fact that there is \nno established Memorandum of Understanding or codified joint action plan between my \nMinistry and District Councils, my Ministry provides the necessary assistance and support \nwhenever there is any request from the District Councils. These assistance and support are as \nfollows – \n \nTechnical support and supervision by officers for the organisation of sport \nactivities; \n \nProvision of equipment, logistics and operational assistance, including marking of \ngrounds and supply of sport materials; \n \nJoint planning and coordination mechanism including technical meetings with the \ncommittees involving my Ministry, District Council and other stakeholders, and \n \nFinancial and in-kind contribution to large scale events, including collaboration \nwith national sport federations and the Mauritius Sports Council. \nThis collaborative approach has delivered tangible and measurable outcomes at both \nregional and community levels. Some examples are les Jeux de l’Ouest 2025 organised by the \nBlack River District Council in collaboration with other stakeholders including my Ministry, \nmobilised approximatively 1,500 participants across 13 villages, covering multiple \ndisciplines and age groups. This large-scale initiative clearly demonstrates the capacity of \nsuch partnership to deliver inclusive multisport events that foster community engagement and \nparticipation. More broadly, this collaboration has contributed to increase grassroot \nparticipation, improve utilisation of sport facilities and strengthen linkages between \ncommunities, schools and sport institutions.  \nSince January 2025 to date, the following sporting activities have been organised in \nConstituency No. 6 – \n \nOne major intervillage football tournament organised by the District Council of \nRivière du Rempart. Access to the Grand Baie and Petit Raffray football ground \nwas provided to the District Council.  \n \nFour ministry-led tournaments under national programmes, namely: deux écoles \nde foot tournaments; two grassroot football tournaments and through the \nprogramme Anou Transform Nou Landrwa, a multisport communiqué outreach \nevent held at Cap Malheureux which integrated physical activities with social \nwellness.  \n \nIn addition, several community level football matches and activities have \ncontinuously been held on Petit Raffray and Grand Baie football grounds. \nMadam Speaker, regarding volleyball and basketball, I wish to inform the House that \nwhile local teams remain actively engaged in regular training and practice sessions within the \nConstituency, no formal competitive tournaments have been staged for these specific \ndisciplines since January 2025. The responsibility to organise events at the competitive level \nrests with national sports federations, regional sports committees and sports clubs. \nMadam Speaker, my Ministry remains committed to further strengthening this \ncollaboration, including exploring more structured frameworks to enhance coordination, \nplanning and long-term sustainability in that prospect. I also wish to inform the House that a \nspecific section will be included in the new Sports Bill to define the clear responsibilities of \nlocal authorities related to the promotion and development of sports in the region. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Beejan, okay? There is another one. \nCONSTITUENCIES NO. 6 & 7 – ROAD WORKS – FUNDS ALLOCATED (2015-\n2024)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/109",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 109,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/109) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to funds allocated between 2015 and \n2024, for road works, including the construction of new roads, resurfacing of existing roads, \nor any other related road works, in each constituency falling under the jurisdiction of the \nRivière du Rempart District Council, he will for the benefit of the House, obtain – \n(a) \ninformation as to the total amount thereof disbursed, and  \n(b) \nthe list thereof and table same, giving details as to the specific nature thereof and \ncosts incurred in each case.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by \nthe District Council of Rivière du Rempart that a total sum of Rs215,097,613 was disbursed \nfor road works in Constituencies No. 6 and 7 during the period 2015 and 2024, comprising \nRs111.6 million for construction of roads and Rs103.5 million for resurfacing works. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, as requested by the hon. \nMember, I am tabling the detailed list of all the road projects carried out, indicating the \nnature, associated costs, source of fund, total surface area and exact location for both \nconstituencies. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Beejan, question! \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. In view of the substantial investment made in \nroad works over the period 2015 till 2024, can the hon. Minister inform the House as to what \nmeasures are being taken by the District Council of Rivière du Rempart to ensure proper \nmaintenance and sustainability of these roads? Thank you. \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, all councils normally have an established regular \nmaintenance programme which include routine inspection and periodic resurfacing and the \nprompt intervention where defects are identified. All the works are being undertaken by the \nWorks Department in the district council, in the presence of all the councillors. Also, all the \ncontractors remain bound by the defect liability provision to ensure durability and long-term \nsustainability of the road works and resurfacing of the roads. \nMadam Speaker: Next question! Hon. Ms Anquetil! \nPAVILLON SWIMMING POOL – MAINTENANCE & TECHNICAL WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/110",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 110,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/110) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the swimming pool at Pavillon, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Sports Council, information as \nto whether the maintenance and technical works have been completed and, if so, indicate \nwhen same will become operational and, if not, where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Mauritius Sports Council that \nleakages were detected in the silica sand filter of the Pavillon Swimming Pool and the \nproblem could pose a risk to the filtration system. Consequently, it was decided to \ntemporarily close the facility as from 14 November 2025 to enable necessary repair works.  \nHowever, during the repair works, additional issues were detected and warranted \nimmediate attention. Consequently, additional equipment had to be procured in order to \nresolve the main problem. Given the complexity of the repair works, a site meeting was held \nin February 2026 whereby the matter was discussed between officers of the Mauritius Sports \nCouncil and the contractor to determine the best way forward to avoid any further delay in \nthe completion of the works. \nI am further informed that as at date, the repair works are still ongoing. It would be \npremature to state a specific date for the reopening of the swimming pool. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to assure the hon. Member that my Ministry is aligned with her \nconcerns. We are closely monitoring the situation and ensuring the timely completion of the \nworks, taking into consideration that the swimming pool is more than 20 years old. \nMadam Speaker: Only questions! Please! \nMs Anquetil: Okay. \nMadam Speaker: Only questions! No statements! \nMs Anquetil: Yes, yes, of course! As usual! \nJe vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Le ministre peut-il expliquer à la Chambre \ncomment une piscine, ayant fait l’objet d’une rénovation récente au début de 2025, a dû \nfermer de nouveau le 14 novembre pour des travaux supplémentaires ? Peut-il également \npréciser l’identité du prestataire ayant réalisé cette rénovation et indiquer si c’est le même \nprestataire qui est actuellement chargé des travaux en cours ? Je vous remercie, Madame la \nprésidente. \nMr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, this is indeed a very good question that the hon. \nMember is addressing to me. The bid was awarded to the lowest bidder, namely Espace \nCommercial Ltée, for a total amount of Rs726,000, including VAT. The works started, like \nyou said, in 2024. We have to deal with the contractor. So, we have a meeting with him this \nweek – I am not sure about the date – and we are going to settle the matter. I know that the \nswimming pool of Pavillon is very demanding. Both the Minister, Dr. Boolell, and yourself… \nMs Anquetil: And Veda. \nMr Nagalingum: …and Veda Baloomoody as well have already asked me about the \ndate of reopening. We are going to see what we can do. \nMadam Speaker: Your utmost best. \nMr Nagalingum: And find a solution. \nMadam Speaker: Your utmost best! Yes, your second question. \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. \nCan the Minister inform the House on the monthly fixed costs associated with the \nclosed swimming pool? Thank you. \nMr Nagalingum: I do not have the details with me.  \nMadam Speaker: Communicate it. \nMr Nagalingum: I can table the answer. \nMadam Speaker: One moment! Yes! \nMs Anquetil: A last one. A very short one. Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nWill the Minister state whether additional public funds will be required to complete the \noutstanding works? Thank you. \nMr Nagalingum: I think there is a guarantee; the retention money that we have. So, we \nare going to have the meeting this week, and we are going to find a solution. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, yes! \nMr Quirin: Peut-on savoir de l’honorable ministre s’il y a eu des arrangements qui ont \nété faits afin de permettre aux nageurs et nageuses, qui généralement utilisent cette piscine, \nde continuer à s’entrainer ? \nMadam Speaker: Ailleurs? \nMr Quirin: Ailleurs, bien sûr ! Voilà! \nMr Nagalingum: We have done this, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Where? In Beau Bassin? \nMr Quirin: Qu’est-ce qui a été fait ? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, where? \nMr Quirin: Ils s’entrainent où ? \nMr Nagalingum: Il y a plusieurs places. Par exemple, à Serge Alfred. Il y a plusieurs \nplaces où on a relocate the athletes for swimming. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Ce n’est pas pareil !  \nOkay, we have finished with Ms Anquetil. \nHon. Members, PQ B/111 has been withdrawn.  \nLAND TRANSPORT APPEAL COMMITTEE – APPEALS RECEIVED (JAN 2024-\nMAR 2026)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/111",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 111,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/111) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Appeal Committee of his Ministry, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to the number of \nappeals received thereat since January 2024 to date, indicating the number thereof disposed \nof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMadam Speaker: So, the next question is for Mr Edouard! \nQUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL, RODRIGUES – CT SCAN APPARATUS – \nPROPOSED REPLACEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/112",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 112,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/112) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nHealth and Wellness whether, in regard to the proposed replacement of the CT Scan at Queen \nElizabeth Hospital in Rodrigues Island, he will state where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commission of Health, Rodrigues \nthat the existing CT scanner apparatus is out of order since the end of November 2023. The \ninitial attempts to get it repaired were unsuccessful. Consequently, a final attempt for repair is \nin the pipeline.  \nAmongst the recommendations between the two parties, the Commission has asked for \nguarantee from the supplier that the CT scan machine will be in good working condition after \nrepair. The supplier, FTM Ltd, on the other hand, has asked for 50% of repair cost prior to \nintervention, of which, both recommendations have been complied with. \nI am further informed that the Commission for Health, in parallel, has undertaken \nnecessary steps for the procurement of a new CT scanner apparatus. In this context, a draft \nbidding document was submitted to the Central Procurement Board in April 2025 and May \n2025. The latter requested to review the technical specifications with the assistance of a \nbiomedical engineer from my Ministry and an electrical engineer from ESD. Necessary \namendments from my Ministry have already been provided. \nHowever, the inputs on the ESD are awaited by Commission for Health. I am made to \nunderstand that the two Electrical Engineers from ESD were to proceed to Rodrigues on 25 \nFebruary 2026 to conduct a survey in order to submit the recommendation. The Ministry of \nNational Infrastructure has been requested to look into the matter. Once the amended \nspecifications would be provided to the Central Procurement Board, the latter will proceed \nwith the invitation of bids. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, Mr François! \nMr François: Madam Speaker, following the recurring technical issues leading to non-\noperationalisation of a CT scan and other medical equipment in Rodrigues, may I ask the \nhon. Minister whether his Ministry and RRA are considering the posting of a Biomedical \nEngineer thereat? \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, in fact in Mauritius we have a lack of Biomedical \nEngineers. We don’t have Engineers but time and again when the need is felt, we will send \nthem to Rodrigues. But as far as all other details and technicalities are concerned, that \nentirely rest upon the Rodrigues Regional Assembly. We are here to support and to give all \nassistance wherever it is required but the request that you have made, I will try to look into it. \nMr François: Madam Speaker, a second one! May I ask the hon. Minister whether his \nMinistry is in the presence of a detailed, comprehensive evaluation report of the non-\nfunctionality of the existing CT scan in Rodrigues? \nMr Bachoo: I have to look into this. \nMadam Speaker: Okay good! \nMr Beejan! \nWORK PERMIT – JUNE 2025 TO MARCH 2026 – PENDING APPLICATIONS \n– REASONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/113",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 113,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/113) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to work permit, he will \nstate the number of pending applications therefor since June 2025 to date, indicating the \nreasons therefor and table the list thereof sector-wise.",
      "answer": "Mr Uteem: Madam Speaker, over the past few years, there has been a substantial \nincrease in the number of applications received for permits at my Ministry from 36,129 in \n2023 to 50,274 in 2025, representing an increase of about 36%. The main types of permits \nissued by the Employment Division of my Ministry are – \nWork permits; \nCertificate of Exemption, and \nEmployment Permits. \nMadam Speaker, for the period June 2025 to March 2026, a total of 41,833 applications \nwere received by my Ministry, out of which 33,100 have already been completed and 8,733 \nare pending. I need to point out that 6,383 of those pending applications were received over \nthe period January to March 2026. \nMadam Speaker, following the implementation of the recommendation of the \nInterministerial Committee on work permits issues, the procedure to apply for a work permit \nfor foreign worker has been simplified considerably. We have replaced the former quota \nsystem with the requirement to show the inability to recruit locally and we have extended the \nrecruitment of foreign labour to all sectors of the economy, including domestic workers. \nAs a result, the number of applications received for foreign workers has substantially \nincreased. However, the number of staff that has to deal with those applications has not been \nincreased and this is the main cause of delay in processing the applications. \nMadam Speaker, there are other reasons also for the delay in processing pending \napplications and these include – \n1. \nSubmission of incomplete or incorrect application by employers. There have been \ncases where more than ten times the application has gone back forth to the \nemployers due to missing documents. \n2. \nSome companies have not regularised the situation of their workers working \nwithout a permit so they need to regularise the situation. First, in that respect, \nsome 3,000 cases of illegal employment have been regularised. \n3. \nWhenever complains are registered against employers at the Special Migrant Unit \nof my Ministry, my Ministry has to ensure that the dispute is satisfactory resolved \nbefore they allow the employer to apply for new foreign workers. \n4. \nThere are also delays in obtaining clearances from relevant authorities. Some of \nthese delays are due to the country of origin of the foreign worker. For example, \nworkers from Madagascar require special clearance from the Embassy of \nMadagascar. With regard to Bangladeshi workers, there are additional security \nclearances at the level of the Prime Minister’s Office which result in delay in \nprocessing work permit application. \n5. \nSome applications are kept in abeyance due to breach by the employer of the \nprovisions of the Non-Citizens (Employment Restriction) Act by employers.  \n6. \nThere are also delays in obtaining recommendations from concerned Ministries \nand Departments. Presently, almost half of the pending applications relate to the \nconstruction sector. These applications require the recommendations of the \nMinistry of National Infrastructure prior to the grant of permits. Similarly, in the \nAgricultural Sector, inspections have to be carried out on site before the Ministry \nof Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries submits its views \non the applications. These requirements imposed by the parent Ministry \ninevitably leads to a delay in processing of work permit. \n7. \nFinally, one of the main causes of the delay is the non-payment or delay in \npayment of prescribed fees by employers. \nMadam Speaker, I however wish to inform the House that around 78% of applications \nfor work permit have been completed within the prescribed time-frame of 21 days after \npayment of the processing fees.  \nIn view of the significant increase in the number of applications received, my Ministry \nhas taken several measures to expedite processing. Since 01 September 2025, work permits \nare being issued electronically with a QR code to employers, thereby eliminating the need for \nprinting of permits and manual signature and companies have to go to the Ministry to collect \nthe permits. To date 17,850 work permits have been issued digitally. There is also \nenhancement being brought to the National Electronic Licensing System to improve \nefficiency and applicants have been provided with online payment facility. \nMy Ministry is in the process of acquiring new computers which are more efficient and \ncan handle large documentation speedily. Lastly, but not least, a request has been made in the \nforthcoming budget for additional staff for the processing of the application. \nMadam Speaker, I am tabling the breakdown of the pending application sector-wise. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Beejan! \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Given the numbers the hon. Minister has just \nstated, employers across various sectors are facing genuine economic distress due to lack of \nstaff, will the hon. Minister table the number of application respective to different countries \nand also ensure that specific measures are taken, including posting of additional staff from \nother sections at the Ministry to clear the existing backlog of work permit applications and \nfor the future applications, so that employers are not repeatedly subjected to such delays? \nThank you. \nMr Uteem: Madam Speaker, I am tabling the breakdown of work permit issued \ncountry-wise as at 28 February 2026. Madam Speaker, as I have mentioned in my reply quite \nlengthily, we are doing our best at the level of Ministry with a limited resources that we have \nto process speedily all the applications. But the hon. Member should appreciate that \neverybody is looking for foreign workers now, foreign domestic workers or the SMEs, all \nthose sectors that previously were not able to recruit foreign workers because of the quota \nsystem, they are all now making applications. So, we are, at the level of my Ministry doing \nour best and as I said, you know if we get the additional funding in the coming budget, we \nwill again be able to clear the backlog. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Yes, Mr Rookny! \nMr Rookny: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Could the hon. Minister please advise if \nupon turning down applications for work permits, whether applicants are made aware of the \nreasons why the applications are turned down? \nMr Uteem: Madam Speaker, all the applications are done electronically on a national \nplatform which is operated by the Economic Development Board and it is through that \nplatform that there is exchange of information. So, as I said, you know, a lot of the reasons \nwhy applications may be turned down is sometime missing documents, so the applicant will \nknow why it is turned down.  \nBut otherwise, you know if there are other reasons why the applications are being \nturned down, again, I have given instruction to my officers to explain to the applicant why the \napplication is turned down and I need to point out that we have gotten rid of the previous \nsystem of appeal whereby the Minister was rejecting the application and then the applicant \nwas making an appeal to the Minister himself to overrule his decision. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. One, two, three.  \nMr Seeburn: Thank you, Madam Speaker.  \nCan the hon. Minister inform the House as to whether, there is any restriction with \nregard to any specific country or is the application for the recruitment of foreign workers \nopen worldwide? \nMr Uteem: Madam Speaker, there is no restriction on the recruitment of foreign \nworkers country wise. However, there are certain additional security clearances that are \nrequired from applicants from certain specific countries.  \nMadam Speaker: Mr Beechook, yes.  \nMr Beechook: Madam Speaker, I would like to know from the hon. Minister whether \napplications are open to Bangladeshi residents, and if yes, are they open to all the sectors or \nrestricted to specific professions? \nMr Uteem: Cabinet has decided a few months ago, Madam Speaker, to allow the \nrecruitment of Bangladeshi workers in certain designated sectors like printing, textile, bakery \nand other scarcity areas. Now, in deciding scarcity areas, my Ministry relies on the list \nprovided by HRDC which has a list of scarcity areas. For example, even in construction, \nthere are certain types of scarce labour where local workers are not available in Mauritius and \ntherefore, a Bangladeshi is eligible to apply for that works.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Ramkalawon.  \nMr Ramkalawon: Following the pending applications, can the hon. Minister consider \nthe workers that require specific skills such as driving to go through the EDB, as well?   \nMr Uteem: Madam Speaker, in the case of drivers, I have to say that before my \nMinistry allowed foreign drivers to come, we had consultation with the Ministry of Land \nTransport but also with the Commissioner of Police and now, we require all foreign drivers to \nhave a valid international driving licence and they have to undertake a course given by MITD \non Sécurité Routière once they are here.  \nSo, for each sector, we stand guided by the parent ministry. The parent ministry will tell \nus what are the specific requirements which the foreign labour must have, the specific skills \nthat he needs to have in order to be given the work permit.  \nMadam Speaker: Good. \nHon. Fourth Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue. \nPOLICE DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT – POSTING OF STAFF – BOOKED \nCONTRAVENTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/114",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 114,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/114) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change \nwhether, in regard to the Police de l’Environnement, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain therefrom, information as to – \n(a) \ndistrict-wise, the number of – \n(i) \nofficers posted; \n(ii) \npatrol vehicles available, and  \n(iii)  noise pollution recording devices available thereat, and  \n(b)  the number of contraventions booked since December 2024 to date for– \n(i) \nnoise pollution  \n(ii)  littering, and  \n(iii) illegal dumping.",
      "answer": "Mr Bhagwan: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that the Police de \nl’Environnement is a unit within the Mauritius Police Force and was established in December \n2000 with a view to assisting my Ministry for the enforcement of environmental law. The \nunit is presently under the charge of an Inspector of Police.  \nWith regard to parts (a) (i) and (ii) of the question, the Police de l’Environnement, is \ncurrently staffed with 36 officers and 8 patrol vehicles are available respectively. Additional \nvehicles from the fleet of my Ministry are provided wherever necessary. With your \npermission, Madam Speaker, I am tabling the breakdown on a district-wise basis. \nAs for part (a) (iii) of the question, the Environment Protection (Control of Noise) \nRegulations 2022 makes provision for different categories of noise: neighbourhood, industrial \npower stations and specified permissible sound level limit for each category. The regulations \nrequire the use of a sound level metre.  \nThe Police de l’Environnement has currently two sound level metres in its custody. My \nMinistry is in the process of acquiring more sound level metres. I am further informed that \naction is being initiated at the level of the police department for the procurement of sound \nlevel metres for the police force.  \nMadam Speaker, the House may wish to be informed that, as per legal provisions in \nrelation to noise pollution, contained in the regulation 3(2) of the Environment Protection \n(Control of Noise) Regulations 2022 – \n“[…] the authorised officer or the enforcing agency shall consider – \n(a) the intensity of the noise as perceived by the ears;” \nand initiate actions against noise nuisances such as loud music, noise from vehicles and \npremises. Fixed penalties are issued for non-compliance.  \nThese regulations empower the authorised officers to take actions without the use of \nsound level metres. Besides, fixed penalty booklets have been sent to all police stations \nacross the island for the enforcement at their level. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the Parliamentary Question, I am informed \nthat the number of contraventions established since December 2024 up to 19 March 2026 by \nthe Police de l’Environnement is as follows – \n\nMaking or causing noise which constitute a nuisance – 161 contraventions; \n\nLittering – 1,887, and  \n\nIllegal dumping – 95. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. Time is up! One last.  \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, I am sad to note that the already meagre … \nMadam Speaker: Don’t make a statement! Put in a question. \nMr A. Duval: No, the question is – How does the hon. Minister explain after the \ncommitment he took last year, one year ago in this House, that the 37 at the time that was \nposted one per district per shift police officer de l’Environnement, has now reduced to 36, the \nnumber of vehicles is the same, the sound level metres is meagre to sound level noise \nrecording devices? How then will the hon. Minister make good on his promise to fight and \ncombat and enforce noise pollution regulations in this country when in fact, the number of \nstaff in this department is going from 37 to 36 for the whole island? \nMr Bhagwan: Madam Speaker, the staffing of the Police de l’Environnement is not \ndecided by me; it is decided by the Commissioner of Police. The Commissioner of Police is \naware of the situation. The hon. Prime Minister replied to one question recently and the \nCommissioner of Police has informed that he will be providing us with additional officers but \napart from the police officers of the Police de l’Environnement, the Commissioner of Police \nhas given directives to all the police officers everywhere. There is no need only for one \nofficer of the Police de l’Environnement. Every officer should be a Police de \nl’Environnement. And, there is regular meetings with the ACP and the district commanders at \nleast to involve them in the fight against this very important issue. \nWith regard to vehicles also, we are providing them. So, we are increasing vehicles. We \nall know the budgetary constraint; I won’t go into the heritaz of the past government but we \nare providing because even in the stations, there are police vehicles and they are acting. I \nknow that this problem of noise pollution is a cause of concern not only to the hon. Member \nbut also to us, all Members of Parliament. We are taking all steps at least to act and also, we \nneed the collaboration of the public. \nMr A. Duval: To pou al dir mazistra zot zorey ti record …  \nMadam Speaker: Come on! \n(Interruptions) \nCome on! \nTime is up! \nMr Bhagwan: To problem zis Grand Gaube twa! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Time is up! We will soon be breaking for tea. \nTime is up now! \nI have to inform you … \n(Interruptions) \nIf you stop talking, maybe I can talk, although I have a big voice, which is not the case \nof every Minister.  \nThe Table has been advised that the following PQs have been withdrawn: B/115, \nB/117, B/123, B/124, B/125, B/126, B/129, B/133, B/135, B/138, B/139, B/140, B/141, \nB/144, B/147, and B/148. \nThank you.  \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that all the business on today’s \nOrder Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10. \nMr Mohamed seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nPUBLIC BILLS \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the following Bills were read a first time – \n(a) \nThe Certificate of Character Bill (No. II of 2026) \n(b) \nThe Anti-Money Laundering, Combatting the Financing of Terrorism and \nCountering Proliferation Financing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill (No. III of \n2026) \nSecond Reading \nTHE OPTICAL COUNCIL (AMENDMENT) BILL \n(NO. I of 2026) \n(4.35 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Health and Wellness (Mr A. Bachoo): Madam Speaker, I beg to \nmove that the Optical Council (Amendment) Bill (No. I of 2026) be read a second time. \nThis amendment has become not only urgent, but absolutely necessary. This Bill is not \njust about amending an existing piece of legislation; it is about correcting a legislative \nblunder committed by the previous government. A blunder that has compromised the legal \nintegrity of the Optical Council itself, damaged the reputation of our health system, and most \ndisturbingly, inflicted real human harm.  \nA law that was illegal from the very beginning. Madam Speaker, let us call a spade a \nspade!  \nThe Optical Council Act 2021, as enacted by the previous administration, is legally \nflawed. It created a council structure that was unlawful from the very beginning.  \nThe current Act makes provision, amongst others, for three opticians from the public \nsector to form part of the Optical Council to regulate the professional conduct of opticians \nand promote their advancement. Yet, surprisingly, unbeknown to the law makers that there \nare not full-time opticians employed in the public sector. There never were!  \nIn fact, there were four opticians who were working on a sessional basis in our \nhospitals. My Ministry has consulted the Attorney General’s office and had been advised that \nthese four opticians are not deemed to be public officers. This means that the law provided \nfor the composition of a council that could not legally exist. \n In other words, the very body tasked with regulating professional standard was itself \nnot properly constituted. This is not a technical error. This institutional illegality resulting \nfrom legislative incompetence and left uncorrected for too long. \nMadam Speaker, as a result of this flawed legal framework, we have witnessed the \nemergence of what can only be described as an unwarranted grip on the regulation of the \nprofession of opticians where certain opticians of the private sector in Mauritius. \n In fact, a small group of individuals, emboldened by vague and unchecked powers and \nignorance of the authority, have taken control of the council and used it, not to uphold \nstandards and promote advancement of the profession, but to protect their own selfish \ninterest, debar competitors and stifle dissent. \nThe Optical Council even abusively exceeded its legal authority by attempting to \ninfluence decision making with regard to optical retail establishments. An area over which it \nhas no mandate. \n It went as far as to submit list to another Ministry recommending which optical \nbusinesses should be blacklisted from subsidy schemes for spectacles for elderly persons. \nThis led to the arbitrary exclusion of lawfully operating optical shops – businesses that \nemploy several Mauritians and serve thousands of citizens.  \nIs this regulation? No, Madam Speaker, this is abuse of power! This is how regulatory \ncapture operates, and this House will not tolerate such unacceptable conduct.  \nLaws do not exist in a vacuum. They have consequences often on the most vulnerable \ncitizens. Let me share one of the most disturbing outcomes of this flawed legislation, a \nheritage of the previous regime.  \nBecause of the opaque and unjust practises permitted under the current Act, particularly \nthe lack of transparency and integrity in the registration process, several foreign professionals \nwho were invited to work in Mauritius found themselves caught in an irreversible trap, some \nwere denied registration after passing through flawed and discretionary examinations while \nothers faced endless administrative hurdles.    \nWorse still, I am told that some of their spouses and children were deported because of \nprimary applicants’ registration was blocked or delayed, not on merit, but due to institutional \nmanipulation and conflict of interests. Is how we treat professionals who come to serve our \npeople? This is not just regulatory failure. This is gross injustice! And it has happened under \nthe very legislation we now propose to amend.  \nThis Bill seeks to do what the previous administration failed to do: bring legality, \nprofessionalism, fairness and inclusiveness to the regulation of opticians and orthoptist in \nMauritius.  \nWe are – \n\nRectifying the illegal composition of the council by removing the requirements \nfor the representation of public sector opticians; \n\nFormally recognising orthoptists, essential vision care professionals and allowing \nfor their registration and representation; \n\nClarifying the definition of opticians and introducing a definition for optometrist; \n\nEnding the pre-registration examination system that is currently riddled with \nconflict of interests and low transparency, and aligning registration with best \npractices used by other professional councils such as the Allied Health \nProfessionals Council and Nursing Council. It is also worthy to note that there are \nno examinations for registration of opticians in France or in India. Let me remind \nthe House that prior to 2021, opticians were regulated by the Optician \nRegistration Board and there were no examinations, there were no problems and \ncertainly no abuse; \n\nDefining and regulating eye health professionals more clearly by harmonising, \nupdating and broadening the categories of professionals eligible for registration \nunder the council, and finally \n\nWe are drawing a clear legal line: the Optical Council will regulate professionals. \nThey have nothing to do with commercial enterprises. Optical retail outlets will \ncontinue to be regulated under other appropriate enactments. \nIn doing so, we will not only restore legality. We are also creating a more inclusive and \nmore regulatory environment that better reflects the multidisciplinary nature of vision care \ntoday.  \nMadam Speaker, these amendments have not been drafted in a vacuum. They followed \nthree working sessions with the Optical Council in May and November 2025 and they also \ntake onboard the realities faced by professionals in the field of vision care, patients and the \nMinistry alike. \nMadam Speaker, the Optical Council (Amendment) Bill 2026 is more than a set of \ntechnical corrections. It is a statement of principle. It is the repudiation of the incompetence \nof the past and a restoration of legality, decency and order in the regulation of eye care \nservices in Mauritius.  \nIt is a rejection of unilateral control and a promise to both our professionals and our \npeople that integrity and justice will prevail in the governance of health.  \nIt is also a timely step forward in ensuring that the legislation is harmonised with best \npractices, updated to reflect current needs and inclusive of all qualified professionals in this \nessential field.  \nMadam Speaker, let me now deal briefly into the principal provisions of the Bill and \ntheir justifications. \nClause 3 provides for the inclusion or definition for orthoptists, foreign orthoptists, \nvisiting orthoptists and optometrists, that is, someone who, inter alia, evaluates visual acuity \nand prescribe, fits and supplies optical appliances as well as clarify the definition on some of \nthe terms. \nClauses 4, 5 and 6 provide for inclusion of orthoptists, foreign orthoptists, visiting \nopticians and visiting orthoptists to be covered under the Act.  \nClause 7 and 8 provide for the new composition for the council by removing \nrepresentations of public sector opticians, increasing the number of opticians, removing \nrepresentation from the Optical Association of Mauritius as the latter is not representative of \nall opticians in the country, including a representative from the Ministry of Finance and the \nConsultant-in-Charge, Subramania Bharati Eye Hospital, and the replacement in case of \nvacancy. \nClause 9 provides for the quorum and frequency of meetings of the council. Clause 10 \nprovides for an orthoptist to be eligible to be appointed as registrar in addition to an optician.  \nClause 11 provides for amendment to Part IV of the Act pertaining to the registration of \noptician to include orthoptist, foreign orthoptist and visiting opticians or visiting orthoptist \nand it will repeal the requirement for examinations to be conducted by the council. \nClause 12, 13, 14 and 15 provide for inclusion of orthoptist and foreign orthoptist, \nvisiting opticians and visiting orthoptist in the annual list of professionals.  \nClause 16, 17 and 18 will enable the Optical Council to exercise discipline over the \nprofession of orthoptist. Clause 19, 20, 21, 22 provide for the new membership of the \ndisciplinary tribunal and the manner for the conduct of disciplinary measures. \nClause 23 provides for deregistration of orthoptists and foreign orthoptists. Clause 24 \nprovides for appeal to be made by aggrieved orthoptists and foreign orthoptists against the \ndecision of the Optical Council. \nClause 25 provides for the offences to be levelled against orthoptists and foreign \northoptists. \nClause 26 provides for amended list of pharmaceutical products authorised to be used \nby optometrists. Clause 27 provides new conditions for the conduct of election of members of \nOptical Council. \nClause 28 provides for qualifications of the different categories of professionals to be \nregistered with the Council and finally Clause 29 provides that these amendments shall come \nin operation on a date to be fixed by proclamation. \nMadam Speaker. I now commend this Bill to the House not only for the sake of \ncompliance but for the sake of public interest and professional dignity. \nThank you. \nDr. Boolell rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nAt 4.46 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.27 p.m., with Madam Speaker on the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated. \nHon. Leader of the Opposition! \nThe Leader of the Opposition (Mr G. Lesjongard): Merci, Madame la présidente.  \nMadame la présidente, j’ai écouté avec beaucoup d’attention l’intervention de \nl’honorable ministre de la Santé sur le projet de loi, c’est-à-dire le Optical Council \n(Amendment) Bill et je suis assez surpris de par ses propos. \nIl a énoncé de graves accusations, premièrement, contre l’ancien gouvernement qui \navait amené la loi au Parlement en 2021, si je ne me trompe pas, et aussi contre le Conseil. \nMadame la présidente, pour le peu de temps que j’ai été au Parlement, j’ai aussi eu \nl’occasion d’être ministre pendant quelques années. Quand le ministre fait mention de \nl’illégalité de cette loi qui est en existence pour le moment, je me pose la question, Madame \nla présidente, je pense que la plupart de ceux qui ont servi ce pays comme ministre le savent, \nc’est le bureau de l’Attorney General et les officiers de l’Attorney General’s Office qui \ntravaillent sur les projets de loi et c’est sur les recommandations de ces officiers \nqu’éventuellement au niveau du Conseil des ministres, on approuve les projets de loi. \nAlors, je ne comprends pas trop l’argument énoncé par le ministre. En ce qui concerne \nla composition du conseil, il a fait référence aux personnes, c’est-à-dire les officiers qui \nétaient sur ce conseil et qui étaient des officiers du ministère. Il a fait comprendre que c’était \ndes officiers qui n’étaient pas employés à plein temps mais des officiers qui été en un \nsessional, si je ne me trompe pas, voilà ce qu’il avait dit. Mais, Madame présidente, je me \nsuis renseigné et je comprends que there is no post as such in the Ministry, to be able to \nrecruit an optician whereas, Madam Speaker, they have been there, I understand, those \npersons, for the past 25 years which means that they may not be Public Officers but they have \nbeen providing service to the Ministry for the past 25 years, Madam Speaker. \nNow, having said that, Madam Speaker, I believe the hon. Minister, today, had two \npossibilities. One, it is confirmed what he has said in this House. The first one was to \ncompletely scrap the existing legislation and come up with a new legislation or if as he said, \nit was illegal – il y a eu des maldonnes au niveau du conseil, – he should have made a \nstatement to the police from the very day he was made aware of the situation and not come \ntoday, like I said, to this House with an amendment to the Bill and make that gratuitous  \nallegations, Madam Speaker. \nHaving said that, Madam Speaker, let me say a few things. There are things that I \nwelcome in this piece of legislation, for example, to formally bring orthoptist under the \nregulatory umbrella of the Optical Council because for too long, Madam Speaker, there has \nbeen ambiguity regarding their status and this Bill, Madam Speaker seeks to correct that. \nHowever, Madam Speaker, while the intent of this Bill may be noble, the mechanisms \nproposed raise serious questions regarding patient’s safety, professional autonomy and the \ngovernance of the Council itself. \nToday, Madam Speaker, what we see in this piece of legislation was what was \ncriticised when that Act was brought into this House in 2021 et permettez-moi, Madame la \nprésidente, pour étayer ce que je suis en train de dire, de me référer à l’intervention de \nl’honorable Richard Duval à l’époque, et je cite – \n« Je vois que le ministre va accentuer la présence des fonctionnaires sur ce conseil ».   \nEt, j’espère, il n’est pas là aujourd’hui, que l’honorable Richard Duval n’y verra pas \nune entrave à l’indépendance de cette institution quand il avait affirmé à l’époque, je cite – \n« Et si on y ajoute à cette liste, (…) le représentant du bureau du PMO et celui de \nl’Attorney General’s Office, le ministre aura sous son control sept membres de ce \nconseil, ce qui représente presque la moitié de l’Optical Council »  \nDe ce fait, la question de l’indépendance de tel conseil se pose et j’y reviendrai un peu \nplus tard, Madame la présidente, à cet argument qui avait été énoncé à l’époque. \nMadam Speaker, let me address certain specific provisions of this Bill and I hope, I will \nhave the full attention of the hon. Minister for what I am going to say. Madam Speaker, as \nLeader of the Opposition, my duty is to scrutinise these provisions to ensure that the people \nof this country are not short-changed in the name of administrative conditions and in doing \nso, Madam Speaker, I have measured this Bill against international best practice, specifically \nat the regulatory frameworks of the UK and Australia. Both recognised globally for robust \nhealth profession regulation. And, Madam Speaker, the comparison reveals significant \ndepartures from international standards and I shall address six critical areas of concern. \nFirstly, patient safety and the abolition of the preregistration examination. Madam \nSpeaker, let me draw the attention of the House to the Explanatory Memorandum and also to \nclause 11 of the Bill which both deal with preregistration where it is explicitly stated that the \nobject of this Bill is to abolish the preregistration examination for opticians and this is not a \nminor administrative trick, Madam Speaker. This is the removal of a critical safeguard. \nMadam Speaker, under the 2021 Act, practitioners were required to hold an approved \nqualification and pass a preregistration examination and this served as a final regulatory \ngatekeeping mechanism. It verified professional competency beyond paper qualification and \nensured that graduates, Madam Speaker, met local clinical standards.  \nMadam Speaker, now this House needs to be informed what safeguards will replace this \nexamination to ensure that practitioners entering the profession meet the required competency \nstandards to protect the Mauritian public. We must also remember that optometry education \nstandards vary significantly across countries. For example, Madam Speaker, how will the \nCouncil verify that foreign trained practitioners meet local clinical standards without a \npreregistration examination? Et cette nécessité, Madame la présidente, est fondamentale. \nMoi-même, en tant qu’ingénieur de profession, je suis passé par là. J’ai dû faire deux années \nd’apprentissage et passer des examens avant de pouvoir exercer comme un ingénieur \nprofessionnel. Alors là, on est en train d’abolir that preregistration, Madam Speaker.  \nNow, let us have a look at international practice, Madam Speaker. For example, in \nAustralia, overseas trained optometrists must pass the Competency in Optometry \nExamination. A very rigorous assessment comprising both written and clinical components, \nadministered by the Optometric Council of Australia and New Zealand before they can be \ngranted a general registration. In the UK, the General Optical Council maintains strict \naccreditation standards for qualification and may require additional training or assessment for \noverseas applicants. The WHO, in its 2024 Guidance on Health Practitioner Regulation, \nexplicitly identifies defining minimum levels for competence as a core regulatory function for \npatient safety. And what are we doing here, in Mauritius? We are being asked to abolish this \nsafeguard without a structured replacement. \nMadam Speaker, is the hon. Minister aware that most international regulatory bodies \nretain mandatory competency assessment prior to registration? Then again, if so, why is \nMauritius moving in the opposite direction? And if you will allow me, I will put that \nquestion. Does Government have a sinister motive in abolishing the preregistration \nexamination for opticians? Madam Speaker, by removing this examination, we are \nprioritising the speed of registration over the safety of the patient. This House, Madam \nSpeaker, seeks assurance that alternative, robust competency assessment, whether a \nsupervised internship, a clinical portfolio or a modified examination will be put in place. \nOtherwise, Madam Speaker, we risk diluting the standards of eyecare in our country. \nMadam Speaker, let me now dwell on an important clause of the Bill which I raised \nearlier and which concerns the governance and independence of the regulator, which to me, is \nfundamental to this piece of legislation. Madam Speaker, let me refer to clause 7 which \nrestructures the Optical Council. As it is, it is set in the Explanatory Memorandum and the \nhon. Minister explained to us that this specific clause is to address an anomaly with regard to \npublic sector representation.  \nYet, Madam Speaker, the proposed composition under the clause 7(1) shows a \nfundamental shift in the balance – now, with only six elected members from the profession \nand seven ex-officio or appointed members, including representatives from the Ministry of \nHealth, the Prime Minister’s Office, the Attorney General’s Office, the Ministry of Finance \nand two persons appointed by the hon. Minister. Madam Speaker, may we know from the \nhon. Minister as to why the number of professional members from the optical sector is being \nreduced and how does Government intend to preserve the principle of professional self-\nregulation? Et je retourne à ce que l’honorable ministre Richard Duval avait dénoncé avec \nbeaucoup de verbes il y a quelques années de cela, spécifiquement concernant ce conseil, \nMadame la présidente. \nNow, Madam Speaker, let me compare this with international models and I will make \nreference again to UK and Australia. In the United Kingdom, Madam Speaker, the General \nOptical Council comprises six registrant members, that is, optometrists and dispensing \nopticians who are elected by their peers and six lay members, including an independently \nappointed Chair. This ensures a professional parity while safeguarding public interest through \nindependent oversight.  \nIn Australia, the Optometry Board operates under the National Registration and \nAccreditation Scheme with a structured balance of practitioners and community members \nappointed via a transparent merit-based process. Crucially, Madam Speaker, the Board enjoys \nstatutory independence. Ministerial direction is limited only to broad policy, not individual \nregulatory decisions. What we see here, under this Bill is that elected professionals are \noutnumbered. The addition of members appointed directly by the Minister will give executive \nsignificant sway over regulatory outcomes. What guarantee, if I may ask the hon. Minister, \nwill he give to this House that these appointment powers will not be used to influence \nregulatory decisions affecting the optical profession? \nMadam Speaker, the WHO guidance on this issue is clear: effective regulation requires \nassurance of independence and the governance and accountability of professional regulators \nto maintain public confidence. Again, with regard to that, this piece of legislation goes in the \nopposite direction. \nNow, another issue, Madam Speaker, is that of conflict of interest and the role of \nophthalmologists. Madam Speaker, clause 7 (1) grants a permanent seat to the Consultant-in-\nCharge of the Subramania Bharati Eye Hospital. Now, while we respect expertise of \nophthalmologists, how does granting a permanent seat to a consultant ophthalmologist not \nconstitute a conflict of interest, given that ophthalmology and optometry have overlapping \nscopes of practice? Allowing one professional to directly participate in regulating another \nraises concern regarding professional independence and bias in disciplinary matters. \nFurthermore, is the Minister aware that ophthalmologists in Mauritius may operate \noptical retail businesses without being registered under the Optical Council? What measures \ndoes this Bill, Madam Speaker, introduce to address this regulatory gap and prevent unfair \ncompetition? \nWill the Government consider introducing, Madam Speaker, clear statutory rules \nregarding the ownership of optical shops to ensure that dispensing activities are properly \nsupervised by registered professionals? We cannot have a situation where one group is \nstrictly regulated while another operates outside the regulatory framework. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to draw the attention of the House to clause 3 which deletes the \ndefinition of “practice of optometry” from the principal Act. How will the removal of this \nstatutory definition not create legal ambiguity regarding who is authorised to perform \noptometric procedures? Legal definitions, Madam Speaker, establish the boundaries of \nprofessional practice. Removing this definition will definitely create uncertainty regarding \nwhat activities constitute optometry and how enforcement should occur. Without a clear legal \ndefinition, Madam Speaker, how does the Government intend to prosecute individuals or \ncompanies engaged in the illegal practice of optometry? \nAgain, I will refer the House to international practice. In the United Kingdom, the \nOpticians Act of 1989 contains precise statutory definition of regulated activities, that is, \nsight testing, contact lens fitting, sale of optical appliances. Therefore, enabling clear \nprosecution of illegal practice. In Australia, the national law provides an explicit framework \nfor defining the practice of the profession, supported by board-endorsed scope of practice \nstatements. \nFurthermore, Madam Speaker, merging the definition of “optician” in this Bill risks \nblurring the distinction between clinical practitioners and retail optical operators, thereby \nweakening professional enforcement.  \nThis leads me to a broader concern, Madam Speaker. Let me ask the Minister: Has his \nMinistry conducted an assessment of the number of companies currently operating in \nMauritius in breach of the Optical Council Act of 2021? If this is the case, may I ask him to \ntable a report before this House? Can the hon. Minister reassure the House that this \namendment bill is not designed directly or indirectly to regularise or protect companies that \nhave been operating illegally in this country?  \nThe timing of this piece of legislation raises legitimate concerns and questions, Madam \nSpeaker. If we are removing competency assessment and blurring professional definitions, \nwho truly benefits? What specific enforcement mechanisms does this Bill introduce to \nstrengthen the Council’s ability to prosecute illegal optical practice? \nMadam Speaker, in the UK, optical businesses must be enrolled with the General \nOptical Council and comply with published standards. In Australia, business registration is \nseparate from practitioner registration with clear corporate governance requirements. \nMadam Speaker, we cannot support reforms that appear to lower barriers for some \nwhile raising burdens for registered and compliant practitioners. \nMadam Speaker, given the profound changes proposed, allow me to question the \nMinister on whether the Optical Council – he said that, but I am saying ‘formally’ – was \nformally consulted prior to the drafting of this amendment bill? If this is the case, as he said, \nwill he table the Council’s written response before the House? Were registered optometrists \nand dispensing opticians given a formal opportunity to submit representation before finalising \nthis piece of legislation? \nRegulatory reform, Madam Speaker, requires trust and collaboration. Is this the case \nwith this piece of legislation? The WHO emphasises that transparent processes for standard \nsetting and appointment are essential for regulatory legitimacy. Rushing this legislation \nwithout meaningful engagement, Madam Speaker, is, in my humble opinion, taking risk of \ncreating a regulatory framework that lacks professional buying and public confidence. \nMadame la présidente, en guise de conclusion, c’est vrai que quand j’ai regardé le \nprojet de loi, c’est un projet de loi qui va, éventuellement, apporter une certaine dose de \nclarification à la profession, ce qui est une bonne chose pour les citoyens de ce pays. Mais en \ncontrepartie, il y a beaucoup de questions auxquelles le ministre doit répondre afin de \nrassurer cette population. \nJe vous remercie, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Merci beaucoup. \nMaintenant, j’ai le Dr. Aumeer ! \n(5.54 p.m.) \nDr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis Central): Thank \nyou, Madam Speaker. \nThis is the second time that I am getting the opportunity to give my opinion and views \non the Optical Bill, which was firstly presented to this House in 2021. \nI have listened carefully to the Leader of the Opposition, and I have to tell him that if \ntoday the Minister has had to bring certain amendments to the Optical Bill – notwithstanding \nthat we all agree to everything – it is exactly because of the flaws and the perceptions that \nhave been in that Bill when it was enacted, which favoured a few!  \nSecondly, when he talks about the fact that we do not have any public officers, namely \nopticians, working on contractual agreement in the public hospitals, he then says that we \nshould not have the Consultant Ophthalmology sitting on the Board. He is contradicting \nhimself! You either want one or not. But I fully support that we do need a specialist in the \nfield of ocular vision, namely ophthalmologists, to sit around with opticians to bring the best \neyesight care standard in this country. \nMadam Speaker, I have no doubt that the hon. Minister, when he is bringing in \namendments to this Bill, his main objectives and concerns are to strengthen the regulation of \noptical profession, and, at the same time, enhance the quality of eye care services in this \ncountry. Obviously, amendments are brought because he had thought and seen that there were \ngaps and shortcomings in the previous Bill and his aim must now be seen in the amendments \nthat he is bringing as to improving registration, licensing procedures and clarifying the scope \nof the practice. All changes that are to be brought must be seen to protect the public at large. \nThese are the main people who are concerned, not us law makers or whatever we call \nourselves, but it is the public sitting outside, there, should be seen as being protected and as \nhaving the best benefits of these amendments. Also, the profession, a profession which will \nbe professionally accountable but also having a forward working optical practice. \nMadam Speaker, for discussion’s sake, it is extremely important that the House and the \npublic at large, who are listening to us, understand the purview of this Bill and who of those \nwho will be directly involved in the delivery of care of eye sight in this country – talking \nwidely, the optical practice. We are talking about optometrist; we have four categories – \n \nOptometrist; \n \nDispensing optician; \n \nOpticien lunetier, and  \n \nthe Orthotist. \nFor those who, here, maybe find all these terms confusing –  \n \nThe optometrist sells glasses, contact lenses, consult you, can specify glasses but \ncannot prescribe medications. It is very important and this is why I will say to the \nhon. Leader of the Opposition, we need to have a consultant Ophthalmologist on \nthe Council. They are allowed to prescribe.  \n \nDispensing opticians only sell glasses and fit contact lenses. They are not \nsupposed to do consultation unless they have acquired bachelor degrees \nafterwards that allow them to do that.  \n \nL’opticien lunetier, lui c’est quelqu’un qui est gradué en France et c’est un \nconcept très strict same as the optometrist but are not allowed to look after those \nbelow the age of 16, and  \n \nthe orthotist, his main scope of work is to investigate, diagnose those who have \nbroad eye movement disorder, binocular vision, strabismus, like myself – some \npeople always call me tire cari guet diriz ene kote. But are not allowed to sell \nglasses. So, we need good orthotists in this country. \nMadam Speaker, having said so, having gone very in depth into the Bill, I will broadly \ncomment on three aspects. However, I have to say that the three aspects on which I am going \nto comment on does not mean that I am going against the intentions and the concept that have \nbeen elucidated in the Bill by the hon. Minister but only to say that my concerns are as they \nwould be and I am sure the hon. Minister during his summing up will be able to reassure us – \nand knowing him very well, you had a long talk yesterday as well, – I am sure he will make \namendments if he deems necessary. \nI will comment mainly on the abolition of pre-registration examination for those \nopticians and orthotists, about deleting the definition of the practice of optometry, and thirdly, \nif time allows, composition of the Council. I have to say that I had a few meetings with \nrepresentatives of the Optical Association of this country and the Optical Council. I have \nlistened to their views not saying that all that they said were determinant in what I am going \nto say but I gave a listening ear to them and I am sure the hon. Minister has done the same as \nI did. I will not comment on the abolition of pre-examination, pre-registration exams likewise \nas I did in 2021.  \nAt the time, the arguments were, we will have selective exemption of certain optician, \noptometrist or dispenser optician that come from United Kingdom and I was totally against in \nmy speech that we cannot have selective exemption. We either need to have exams for all or \nwe don’t do the exams. Unfortunately, or fortunately, the hon. Minister has come and said \ntoday in his Bill that he is not favourable that we continue with exams, and is, therefore, \nabolishing it. So, we have gone from one extreme to the other. My question is: we should not \nbe taking the preregistration exam very lightly because such a system has proven and \ndelivered its promise.  \nIn May 1921, exams were carried by the Optical Council and it showed that the past \nrate was only 15%. They changed it to have foreign examiners and, subsequently, when the \ncontent of the examination papers was produced, the pass rate has improved to 40%. The \nquestion that I ask myself, and we should ask ourselves: why abolishing a process that are \nstandard practice in various parts of the world, including United Kingdom, India or other \nparts in Europe, developing countries? We are reversing a process, and, whether we like it or \nnot, exams have ensured an unbiased evaluation of all concerned in the field of optometry \nirrespective of whether some like it or not. Exams are objective assessments, it is unbiased, it \nis objective. For the four categories, I have mentioned, there are different sets of papers for \nthem, they have different pass marks. Also, the questions that have been put in the Optical \nCouncil exams are not theoretical, they are all practical.  \nAnd, finally, the number of times you can take the exams, even you fail ten times you \ncan still take exams – there is what we call an endless number of attempts. I am of the \nopinion, Madam Speaker, that we need to have benchmark standards in the practice of \neyecare since it is a very delicate practice. If we look here, I just had a count today. 30% of us \nsitting here wear glasses, this is it. 40% of the population have non-communicable diseases. \nOut of it, diabetes form nearly 400,000 people, pre-diabetic or diabetic have eye sight issues. \nThis is serious. We are talking of a profession that we should not take lightly, whatever the \namendments we will bring.  \nKnowing quite well that we have optometrists and opticians that come from different \nparts of the world and institutions, we have to be extremely careful as to whom of those we \nare going to give a license to practice. Otherwise, because a practice that has acceptable \nstandards, who are recognised otherwise we will be opening a can of worms and I mean it – \nwe will be opening can of worms because the backdoor entry will just wide open. When it \ncomes to foreign opticians, I fully agree we can’t just subject them to examination, we will \ndiscourage people to come.  We have a way where councils have temporary registrations \nwhere they won’t need exams.  \nSome people have said exams are biased. Exams are truly biased, Madam Speaker. You \nknow why they are biased? They are biased against those who do not study. Those who don’t \ncome to the scratch. Those who do not have the level of expertise. Those who have not made \nit fully by attending their courses. Exams are biased against these people. Otherwise, exams \nhave proven that it will show exactly who those who are competent, efficient, highly \nprofessional and deliver the best skill service. \nMadam Speaker, professional expertise is at the core of any regulation and \naccreditation. If exams – which I take myself and engage myself personally, which I fully \nsupport, – is to be removed, I hope that the hon. Minister of Health must reassure the \npopulation at large, and the public, of a system that he would be putting in place, that has – \n1. \nstrict educational accreditation validated by the local and foreign authorities; \n2. \nevidence of accredited university training by those who are applying to be \nregistered, where the prospecting optician has been doing his training, and \n3. \n thirdly, licencing must be linked to recognise educational authorities.  \nIn my opinion, Madam Speaker, competency assessment, be it through existing exams \nor any other mechanism which the hon. Minister may deem fit, and, surely, he has that in \nmind, must ensure that only those with the highest standards of practice, competency, \nprofessional integrity, based on evidenced medical practice, those are the ones who should be \nrecognised by the Council. For example, the developing world also has noted that they need \nto come with a more valid form of assessment and they came with their OSCE. \nThis amendment must not be seen as a back door entry for those who knowingly well, \ncannot take exams in view of their limited competency to have an easy registration pathway \nto the Council.  \nI would just complete my arguments and I have noted at section 17, subsection 2(d) \nwhere the practitioner will pass such an interview as conducted by the Council. I would have \nbeen very comforted by the Bill if there were more details about who would conduct the \ninterview; whether it will be local practitioners, foreign practitioners, whether it will be \nmembers of the Council that will be coopted to have an expertise in optometry or in relation \nto the field and that will surely be an element of subjective assessment and we have to be \nextremely careful. Any subjective assessment will bring this element of bias and can be \ncontested by anybody.  \nThank you, very much.   \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, Dr. Aumeer.  \nYes, Mr Beechook.  \n(6.06 p.m.) \nMr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil): Merci, Madame la \nprésidente.  \nMadame la présidente, en ce début de soirée, nous débattons des amendements à \nl’Optical Council Act 2021. Mon ami et collègue du Parlement a largement élaboré, d’ailleurs \nde par son métier, l’aspect vraiment médical du dossier mais néanmoins, moi, je vais élaborer \nsur le marché de l’optique, Madame, rightly so, the hon. Member has pointed it out, it \nconcerns 40% of Mauritians. Cependant, Madame la présidente, ce marché est dominé par la \nmainmise atomisante de l’Optical Council. Si je dois résumer ce marché, je me réfère à \nl’adage en Kreol qui dit – \n« Met lisien vey sosis. »  \nJe vais m’expliquer, Madame la présidente. Qui dit marché, dit revenue. Qui dit \nrevenue, dit intérêts commerciaux. Qui dit intérêts commerciaux, dit profits. Et lorsque ces \nacteurs, par la même, les bénéficiers de ces intérêts commerciaux sont chargés de réguler la \npratique du métier et par ricochet le marché lui-même, qu’avons-nous ? Une situation \nubuesque résumant l’adage lisien vey sosis. \nLa loi de 2021, Madame la présidente, a donné lieu à une cartellisation sidérante, \ncadenassant, verrouillant, à double, triple, quadruple tours l’accès au marché aux nouveaux \nopérateurs et cela, aux profits des opérateurs existants. Nous avons vu dans le discours du \nministre de la Santé comment en l’absence des représentants légitimes de l’État, l’Optical \nCouncil a été accaparé par des opérateurs sans scrupules. Figurerez-vous, le Registrar de \nl’Optical Council est lui-même un opérateur du marché de l’optique. N’est-ce pas un cas \nflagrant de conflit d’intérêt ?  \nJe félicite le ministre de la Santé d’être aujourd’hui vent debout contre toutes les lobbys \nmercantilistes en faveur du maintien du statu quo.  \nMadame la présidente, l’opposition et les opposants aux amendements ciblent \nl’élimination de l’examen qui mène à l’enregistrement des opticiens, des ophtalmologues, des \nopticiens lunetier, etc…   \nMadame la présidente, sachez que ces examens justement, c’est le kalashnikov entre les \nmains des accapareurs du conseil qui s’en sert pour re-éliminer de manière chirurgicale la \ncompétition dans le marché.  \nJe m’explique. \n Comment ces examens sont-ils organisés ? Par le MES.  \nSur la recommandation de qui ? L’Optical Council.  \nQui sont les examinateurs ? Ils sont choisis selon une liste de trois ou quatre personnes. \nSoumise par qui ?  L’Optical Council.  \nQui rédigent les papiers d’examen ? Ces mêmes personnes inféodées à l’Optical \nCouncil.  \nQui corrigent ces papiers d’examen et notent les candidats ? Ces mêmes personnes. \nRésultat ?  \nMr Jhummun: Judge and party! \nMr Beechook : En juin 2024, seuls 9 candidats sur 22 ont pu passer les examens. En \nnovembre 2024, seuls 7 sur 29. C’est une aberration, Madame la présidente.   \nToujours au sujet des examens, la loi stipule que les examens doivent avoir lieu tous les \nans. Quand est-ce que les derniers examens ont-ils eu lieu ? En Novembre 2024 ! Il y a plus \nd’un an et demi. Et imaginez-vous que s’est-t-il déroulé depuis ?  \n1.  Beaucoup de magasins de l’optique, notamment les petits, ont fermé parce qu’en \nl’absence d’opticiens, ils ne peuvent opérer. \n2. Les professionnels étrangers, en quête d’une occupation permit, ils obtiennent \nd’abord un titre de séjour temporaire d’un an en attendant les examens et bien, ils \nsont éliminés et ils sont contraints de rentrer dans leurs pays parce que cela fait plus \nd’un an qu’il n’y a pas eu d’examen.  \nCela profite à qui ?  Les opérateurs existants.  \nEt, cela pénalise qui ? Les nouveaux entrants.   \nC’est de la persécution professionnelle. \nLa perversion la plus nauséabonde, Madame la présidente, l’Optical Council profite de \ncette situation pour outrepasser son mandat, pour aller rencontrer des entités, notamment \nétatiques, le ministère de la Sécurité sociale, la SICOM, la NIC. Pour faire quoi ? Pour faire \néliminer les prestataires qui s’inscrivent auprès de ces instances. C’est de l’élimination \ncommerciale de prestataires.  \nJ’ai devant moi, Madame la présidente, une lettre datant du 26 mars 2025 émanant du \nministère de la Sécurité sociale. Je vais lire les grandes lignes – \n“The Ministry in collaboration with the Optical Council of Mauritius…” \nEntre autres, qu’est-ce qu’ils ont fait ? Ils sont allés rencontrer les officiers du ministère \nde la Sécurité sociale sans que cela soit dans leurs mandat.  \nEt par la suite, quel a été le résultat ?  \n“Thus, you are being deregistered from the Ministry’s list of suppliers of spectacles \nwith immediate effect.” \nDes opérateurs qui s’inscrivent auprès du ministère de la Sécurité sociale bénéficient \nd’un grant de R5000 pour supply des lunettes pour les plus vulnérables. On a outrepassé ce \nmandat pour aller éliminer la compétition. Il a fallu une mise en demeure et l’avis légal du \nState Law Office pour qu’au bout de deux mois, cette entreprise, un nouvel entrant sur le \nmarché, soit réinscrit dans le registre des prestataires du ministère de la Sécurité sociale.  \nVoilà comment opère cette mafia ! \nPour terminer, Madame la présidente, on parle de ce fameux enregistrement des \nprofessionnels. Il faut voir la bonne foi du législateur qui dit qu’il a mis en place un conseil et \nce conseil est chargé de mettre en place un mécanisme. Justement, ce n’est pas un système ou \non va enregistrer qui on veut ou à tour de bras. Bien sûr, il y aura un examen de chaque \ndossier par des professionnels.  \nMais en ce qu’il s’agit de ce fameux enregistrement, Madame la présidente, I can tell it \nwithout fear or favour. Le cas de ce candidat, c’est une aberration ! Ce candidat remue ciel et \nterre pour avoir un enregistrement auprès du conseil de l’Optical Council. Cette personne est \ntitulaire d’un baccalauréat in optometry.  \nLe terme baccalauréat en soi est un undergraduate degree, une licence. They use \nalternative terms, either baccalauréat degree or Bachelor’s degree. En raison de ce \nchangement d’appellation, en fonction des pays, des universités, c’est quelque chose tout à \nfait praticable. Ce candidat a soumis des documentations émanant du World Council of \nOptometry, du Botswana Optometrists Association en Afrique, de l’Indian Optometric \nAssociation, India, du Maha Optometry Association, Mumbai, toutes ces documentations \npour soutenir qu’il est titulaire d’un undergraduate degree, d’une licence en optométrie. En \ndépit de cela, Madame la présidente, il a été éliminé. Son enregistrement n’a pas eu lieu ! \nPourquoi ? Parce que le conseil se cache derrière le Third Schedule, Section 18(2) of the \nOptical \nAct \nwhereby \nacceptable \nqualifications \nare \nBachelor’s \ndegree \nin \nOptometry/Ophthalmic Optometry. But this baccalauréat in optometry is an undergraduate \ndegree in optometry! Voilà comment les personnes de mauvaise foi ont tué, anéanti les \ncandidats ! Je pose la question autrement, Madame la présidente. Nous, au sein de ce \ngouvernement et dans ce pays, sommes tous d’accord qu’il faut attirer les meilleurs talents \nétrangers pour venir travailler pour rehausser le niveau de service et apporter leur expertise.  \nMais je pose une simple question à cette Chambre : comment convaincre un Anglais, un \nIndien, un Américain, un Français, ayant plus de 20 ans d’expérience et étant inscrit auprès de \nl’instance suprême dans son pays d’origine, de venir travailler à l’île Maurice ? On lui dit : \n« Tu sais, il faut que tu passes l’examen de l’Optical Council. » C’est une aberration, \nMadame la présidente ! \nAn hon. Member: Incroyable ! \nMr Beechook: On ne pourra pas le faire ! La raison, le résultat, c’est qu’aujourd’hui, \nceux qui sont là depuis longtemps tiennent des commerces dans des grands centres \ncommerciaux, ils ont pignon sur rue, sur les axes principaux du pays. Et les nouveaux \nentrants, ils ont du mal à trouver de la main-d’œuvre. Tout au long, la rhétorique de mon \ndiscours, c’est pour vous démontrer, Madame la présidente, comment l’Optical Council a usé \nde son pouvoir pour éliminer la compétition. \nJe vais terminer, Madame la présidente. La compétition est importante. Il est crucial de \ndémocratiser l’accès à ce métier. Je prends l’exemple de mes verres à moi. Cela m’a coûté R \n12,000 ; les verres antireflets, etc. Le même verre, Madame la présidente, je l’ai acheté dans \nun petit magasin d’un nouvel entrant sur le marché. Les mêmes verres, quasiment gamme \nmoyenne, ça vous coûte entre R 35,000 et R 45,000 dans un magasin qui est là depuis \nlongtemps et qui est parenté ou a des contacts au sein de l’Optical Council.  \nCe Bill va permettre, Madame la présidente, l’épanouissement des nouveaux entrants au \nsein de ce marché, de décadenasser, de déverrouiller l’accès au marché et d’offrir aux \nMauriciens des lunettes de qualité, inscrites par les professionnels à des prix abordables.  \nThis is why, Madam Speaker, I am here to commend the Bill to the House. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Merci. Merci. Merci beaucoup ! Je remercie tous ceux qui font un \neffort pour que le public comprenne bien les enjeux.  \nHonourable Ms Babooram ! \n(6.20 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Health and Wellness (Ms A. Babooram): Madam Speaker, \nbefore I proceed with the substance of my contribution, I wish to extend my sincerest and \nmost heartfelt commendation to the hon. Minister, Mr Bachoo, besides whom I have the \nprivilege now to humbly serve at the Ministry of Health and Wellness, for his extraordinary \ndedication, tireless effort and sheer commitment in bringing this Bill before this House. \nThis is not a simple piece of legislation. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Chut! \nMs Babooram: It touches upon the livelihood of dozens of professionals. The health \noutcomes of hundreds of thousands of Mauritians and the integrity of any industry that has \ngrown considerably over the years.  \nMadam Speaker, let me paint a picture of where we stand today.  \nThe Optical Council today comprises around 106 registered professionals both \nMauritians and expats who are registered as optometrist, opticien-lunetier, and dispensing \nopticians, but there are no registered orthoptists. This is our first reason for this Bill: to be \nable to register orthoptists when they become available in the country.  \nUnlike optometrists, orthoptists, as has been thoroughly explained by hon. Dr. Aumeer, \nare specialised in binocular vision anomalies and other complex conditions that affect how \nthe eyes work together. They provide the appropriate therapy in each case. There are now \nmany foreigners in the optical industry and they are trained in various countries. This further \nexplains the importance of a proper Optical Bill. \nNow, coming to our local graduates and professionals, previously, they had to undergo \na professional exam before being registered. However, not many could clear the exam \nbecause of a lack of transparency, information and proper training. \nThe Optical Council (Amendment) Bill will recognise our young professionals and \nregister them in due course if they fulfil all the required criteria. The hon. Minister of Health \nand Wellness has already pointed out the many flaws in the existing Act. I will not, therefore, \nindulge into this again.  \nMadam Speaker, the industry is a flourishing one. That is why rigorous checks and \nproper scrutiny into the profession is needed. There was a time when ophthalmologists, \nalongside two or three opticians, used to recruit opticians and dispensing opticians in the eye \nhospital.  \nWe now have optometrists who are qualified to diagnose different eye pathology using \ncertain equipment and ophthalmic drops and refer to eye specialists whenever needed. The \nsame has been mentioned in the Bill. This explains the need for a proper Bill and regulations \nin order to monitor our optical professionals and avoid cases of malpractice. The study of \noptometry is not currently available in Mauritius. \nTherefore, our students travel abroad to pursue their studies. When they choose to \nreturn back to Mauritius, they have a legitimate expectation to be recognised as professionals \nand serve this country; their country. In this respect, this Bill aims to make it easier for our \nyoung professionals to contribute massively to the welfare of the society.  \nMadam Speaker, with a growing and ageing population of Mauritius, there is a need for \noptometrists, especially in our five regional hospitals. We currently only have part-time \noptometrists serving in the public sector.  \nThis explains the long waiting list, understaffed facilities and preventable suffering. It \nhas been noted that our local professionals are not quite interested in working full-time in \nhospitals. It would then be of utmost importance to recruit optometrists from abroad. \nApart from that, with the new Bill and newly registered optometrists, there is a scope \nthat our locals would be willing to work in the five regional hospitals in order to ensure the \ncontinuity of care. I have spoken about our hospitals being greatly understaffed. I think we \nneed to ponder on this option. Both our hospitals and that of Rodrigues cater for the \nmaximum number of patients needing glasses.  \nThis Government has worked towards a proper regulation of the optical body that this \nBill will attain. Our patients waiting for glasses in hospitals will find their needs satisfied in \ndue course. Thus, reducing the load on our ophthalmologists, allowing them to focus on more \ncomplex eye care such as surgeries and after-care. \nOptometrists are primary eye care providers. They are known for dispensing glasses \nand helping patients to see better but little do patients know that optometrists can diagnose \nvarious eye pathologies on the very first visit. \nSome systemic diseases are seen through eye pathologies and we take the example of \ndiabetic retinopathy that is associated with diabetes mellitus. For instance, many children do \nnot realise that we have a decreased vision. They think it is normal to see poorly. \n However, when the child is brought in for a regular eye exam, starting as young as five \nyears, it can help in detection of many vision anomalies. A well-regulated, well-staffed \noptical profession which is precisely what this Bill moves us towards, is a prerequisite for \nensuring that our children’s vision needs are identified and addressed early. \nUnder the current legislation, it has come to our attention that some professionals with \nappropriate qualifications have been denied registration for as far as 10 years and when asked \nfor a reason – no transparency, no apparent reason were forthcoming. Whereas this \nGovernment has made sure that this Bill aims for transparency as its core importance. \nOur aim is to cater for our local professionals recognise their contribution to society. \nThe COVID-19 pandemic has taught us the importance on relying on local resources. Now, \nwith the crisis in the Middle East, we will definitely need the help of all of our professionals. \nThis Bill facilitates and encourages our professionals in the Diaspora to come and serve our \ncountry.  \nZealous in our commitment to progress, this Government has shown the vision, the will \nand the determination to modernise our institutions and place the welfare of our people at the \nvery heart of its action. At the core of this Bill, lies fairness, transparency and the recognition \nof merit, ensuring that no qualified Mauritian is left behind. Harnessing the potential of our \nprofessionals, both locally and abroad, we are determined to build a stronger, more self-\nreliant healthcare system. Empowering our youth and restoring confidence in our institutions, \nthis reform paves the way for a brighter and more inclusive future. Every citizen stands to \nbenefit from a system that upholds quality, accountability and equal opportunity. Rooted in \nunity, guided by purpose, we must continue working together to strengthen our nation and \nuplift our people. \nAs we move forward, let us do so with pride and determination shaping a Mauritius that \nreflects the excellence, resilience and dignity of its people. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much. Thank you for respecting the time. \nYes, hon. Dr. Boolell! \n(6.29 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Agro-industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries (Dr. \nA. Boolell): Madam Speaker, I feel like saying only fools rush in where angels fear to tread \nand I must say if the hon. Minister has stood up and convincingly spoke of the merits of this \nlegislation, it is precisely to correct not only an anomaly, but a Bill which should not have \nbeen introduced in the first place. \nI am not going to say how controversial it is but the hon. Minister is right, he is being \ndecisive and incisive to bring the necessary amendments and he deserves our congratulations \nbecause time is of an essence and it is the signals which we send to the public which are \nrelevant. \nI made it a point to listen to the speeches delivered by our hon. Friends and I must say \nsome of the arguments put forward by the hon. Leader of the Opposition are worth listening \nto. Notwithstanding what our good friend, our fellow from Dublin has said – the good hon. \nDr. Aumeer – but we will come to the harsh realities. I listened to the arguments put forward \nby our good friend who has spoken very eloquently and he has put across arguments which \ncannot be rebutted and I say hats off to you, Sir. And of course, as to the hon. Lady, she has \nlived up to expectation.  \nBut let me say, what the naked truth is. Our friend, the hon. Minister had lent his ears to \nthose who had been complaining and there was a lot of hue and cry from professionals who \nhave been denied the legitimate rights to work as professionals and this in itself is tantamount \nto violation by an Optical Council which is not legitimate. \nIt may have the legacy but it is not legitimate and it has operated as a closed shop. If we \nare a government which is responsible, we have to speak up and be heard and we cannot \ntolerate an institution to operate simply because it has the legacy but to operate in all \nillegitimacy. As a responsible government, we have to act and act without fear or prejudice \nbecause this is the mandate that we have.  \nThe hon. Minister is right to say the buck stops here. We have to refer to Section \n18(3)(b) of the current Act as has been highlighted by our distinguished friend which \nprovides that examination for registration of opticians shall be held once a year. But since the \nBill was proclaimed – how many times have exams been held and to whose detriment? And \nwho has hidden behind the MES? MES has simply acted as a facade and who prepared the \nexam papers?  \nMs. Anquetil: That is the question! \nDr. Boolell: Who prepared the exam papers? It is not because they have invited a few \nforeign examiners that the job is done. The paper was set deliberately to undermine the \nprocess of democracy and we cannot allow democratic values to be violated and the Minister \nis right to come and say: we are going to widen the circle of opportunities, create \nopportunities for those who are eligible, who have a legitimate right, who had spent time \noverseas studying. Not everybody has the means to go and study in Dublin or France but \nsome make the sacrifices and they go to reputed institutions in India or elsewhere and when \nthey come back, should they be discriminated up on and denied their legitimate rights? \nWhat else have we not been told – that there is no provision for definition of \noptometrists. But when we look at the provision of legislation, it is there, looking at us, \nglaring, obvious, and yet, when I had a letter from the acting Chairperson of the Optical \nCouncil, she said there is no provision. But provision is there! When we look at the law, the \ndefinition … \nMadam Speaker: Section 3. \nDr. Boolell: Section 3, you said it, section 3(g) – \n ““optometrist” – \n(a) \nmeans a person who –  \n(i) \nevaluates visual acuity and prescribes, fits and supplies optical appliances \nfor remedial purposes; and  \n(ii) \nuses such equipment and such medication as miotics, cycloplegics, (…) as \nmay be necessary for remedial purposes;” \nAnd when we look at the Council, Madam Speaker, there is legitimate provision for the \nMinister not only to have his leeway – certainly, he is not going to have his leeway – but who \nare those appointed by Government? Or am I to understand that the representatives of the \nPrime Minister’s Office will bend backwards to the whim and caprices of those who think \nthey can exercise undue influence? Or the representatives from the Attorney General’s office? \nAnd who are the two members who are going to be appointed by the Minister? Any Tom, \nDick and Harry? We are a government which has the responsibility to act and to act without \nfear or prejudice. When you are in government, you decide and you govern not in poetry but \nin prose. That is why we are here! \nMadam Speaker, let me say and I say it in prose, of course, I have talked of \nmembership and I have talked of transparency but there have been sound arguments also put \nforward and I do say, because there are provisions for regulations. Supervised internship, we \nare not against. This is what regulations are here for. What stops us to say that, in the distant \nfuture, we may entertain the proposal made by our good friend, hon. Dr. Aumeer? Why not? \nThe law is an ass but we have to amend, we have to regulate, otherwise there is no point in us \nsitting here, Madam Speaker, if we are not going to amend.  \nLet me also make it quite clear, in relation to who is an orthoptist. Optometrist, we \nalready know about. An orthoptist has to have basic knowledge in brain anatomy. He has to \nhave basic knowledge. You know, the hon. Prime Minister would say the best way to \nremember the 12 nerves, you know what it is? I will not say it. He is laughing. \nMadam Speaker: We do not know! \nDr. Boolell: No, I will not say it that way, otherwise you will ask me to go out. I do not \nwant to be! I can start O, O, O, that is all. \nMadam Speaker: O, O, O. Okay! \nDr. Boolell: Yes, doctors’ secret. In good, how do we say that? As good; not hypocrites \nbut as good Hippocrates. \nMadam Speaker: Hippocrates! Hippocrates! \nDr. Boolell: Now, let me make it quite clear that there is a vast difference and an \northoptist not withstanding that he has to acquire knowledge in relation to brain anatomy, but \nhe is also part and parcel of a team run diligently by an ophthalmologist and they work in \nhospital. And it is a service delivered and it has to be delivered as a team and with a team \nspirit. And this is what an orthoptist does. He makes early diagnosis in children, does not only \nprescribe glasses to be worn but he has more depth as I say, scale and score. Is it lazy eye? \nCan the blurred or double vision be corrected with an eye patch or glasses? If not, will minor \nsurgery do? But there is more to amblyopia or strabismus.   \nNow, I will also refer and the comeback to section 7. You know, when I assess the Vet \nCouncil, do you know the problems we are having? It is a mirror image of the problem being \nencountered in relation to the Optical Council. It is lock, stock and barrel and they prevent \ngood qualified vets to be registered. And I have flagged the issue, I have flagged it but it is \ntime for us now to bring the necessary amendment as a responsible Government and we are \nnot going to retreat nor surrender and I congratulate my good friend, the hon. Minister \nbecause he has not retreated nor surrendered under the able leadership of the hon. Prime \nMinister. \nThank you very much. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you! Yes, hon. Minister! \n(6.40 p.m.) \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, to start with, I would like to thank all my colleagues, \nMembers of Parliament, who have taken part in this debate and now, the House will realise \nthe reason why we have brought this Bill. On the contrary, we have been too late and I know \nthe sufferings that many of our own children have undergone. They have been sitting there \nfor the past many years without getting the right to work in those optical shops. \nYou know, throughout the island, we have got optical shops which are mushrooming \neverywhere but the right to work in those shops is meant only for the handful. They are \nenjoying the luxuries of life, other than lacking the basic necessities of life and that, as a \nresponsible Government, we could not have accepted it. The hon. Leader of the Opposition, \nin the beginning, referred to the statement that I had made, that the Act as it is, is unstatutory \nbecause there are three members, three opticians who form part of the Council and I had \nmentioned that they are illegal. It is not legal because they are not officials and then I have to \nmaintain that they are not officers because they are working on a part time basis and \naccording to the Attorney General’s Office advice, they are not officials and that is the reason \nwhy I had maintained that from the very beginning, this Act itself was illegal and I am going \nto maintain it. \nI would like to refer to the speech made by our friend, hon. Uteem, that was on the \nOptical Council Bill in July 2021. I get the feeling that, of course, I have to congratulate him \nbecause he was farsighted at that time. He was wise enough to have mentioned a few things \nwhich we have seen. I am quoting him. While participating in the debates for the Optical \nCouncil Bill 2021, he stated – \n“There is one aspect of the Bill which has not been dealt with by the then Minister of \nHealth and Wellness and it is the establishment of a monopoly for local opticians when \nit comes to selling spectacles and optical appliances. This Bill is creating a monopoly. \nAs from the day the Bill is passed, only a registered local optician will be able to sell \nspectacles and contact lenses in the country.” \nHon. Uteem further denounced the fact that the main object of the Optical Council Bill \nwas to give opticians the exclusive right to sell spectacles and contact lenses. He also termed \nthis as a lobby from a small group. The latter brought proceedings against 12 companies, \nseeking an order from the Court, preventing them from selling spectacles and lenses but on \nthe day of the hearing, they withdrew the case. He further emphasised the need to allow \ncompetition in this sector, is not just to drive down prices. It is also to do with protecting \nyoung opticians who do not have the financial means to invest in equipment, to invest in \nstock of branded glasses. I thank him for that. He was farsighted enough and he struck the \nnail rightly. \nMadam Speaker, it is necessary for me to address certain arguments that have been put \nforward regarding this Bill. The true intent of this Bill is to modernise and rebalance the \nregulatory framework governing the optical profession in our country. We have to correct the \nstructural weaknesses that have emerged under the current system, including excessive \ngatekeeping, lack of transparency and regulatory capture as my friends have already \nmentioned. This reform ensures that the Optical Council operates in the public interest, \nstrengthens governance, broadens representations and aligns the regulatory framework with \ncontemporary healthcare systems where patient protection, not professional control, is \nparamount. Let me state clearly, many of the arguments reflect a desire to preserve \nentrenched interest rather than to advance patient care or modern regulation.  \nLet me also remind the House that the Leader of the Opposition, who was in \nGovernment in 2021, had a significant responsibility in ushering through the House a Bill \nwhich turned out to be illegal and which gave rise to gross unfairness and injustices. \nRegarding examinations, Madam Speaker, this reform was not taken lightly. It is a \ndeliberate and necessary correction of a system that had become fundamentally flawed, \nunfair, and out of step with modern regulatory practice. \nLet me remind the House that according to the Optical Council Act of 2021, \nexaminations were supposed to held – as my friend, hon. Dr. Boolell, mentioned – at least \nyearly. Members of the Council acted illegally, and only two examinations were held. In six \nyears’ time, we had only 16 who were qualified as opticians, out of hundreds of them who \nwere still roaming around. \nLet me now delve more deeply in issues related to these examinations. The existing \nexamination process, as my friends have already mentioned, raised serious concerns \nregarding fairness and transparency, as the members of the Council were involved – as you \nhave heard – in determining examiners and those responsible for marking. So, they were \nmarking, correcting and doing everything. It was their business. Such an arrangement creates \nan inherent conflict of interest and undermines confidence and integrity. That is the reason \nthey left no stone unturned to see to it that this Bill does not pass in this House. \nSecondly, while the Mauritius Examinations Syndicate was involved, it was limited to \nonly administrative oversight. It did not provide independent technical validation of the \ncontent, standard-setting, or marking. Therefore, the core academic and professional integrity \nof the examination remained within the control of the very body being regulated, which is not \nacceptable. \nThirdly, Madam Speaker, opticians fall within the broader category of Allied Health \nProfessionals. It is important to note that under the Allied Health Professionals Council, there \nare no such pre-registration examinations. Competency is ensured through recognised \nqualifications and regulatory oversight – not through potentially exclusionary examinations. \nWhen we speak of allied professionals, in our country, we have six clusters of Allied \nHealth Professionals in my Ministry. They do not undergo any examination. I am going to \nname a few of them. For example, Occupational Therapists, Orthopaedic Technicians, \nPhysiotherapists, Podiatrists, Chiropodists, Sports Therapists, Audiologists, Speech and \nLanguage Therapists, Dieticians, Nutritionists, Psychologists, Clinical Psychologists, \nPsychotherapists, Psychomotor Therapists, Chiropractors, Osteopaths, Clinical Scientists, \nMedical Imaging Technologists, Medical Laboratory Technologists. They do not participate \nin examinations. They are skilled. They are doing very well, but they are controlled by the \nAllied Professional Council. \nFourthly, historically, opticians were registered earlier under the Optical Registration \nBoard, where no examinations existed. And that was the case for the past 60 years. There was \nno evidence that the system compromised standards or patient safety. The introduction of the \nexamination did not demonstrably improve outcomes, but instead introduced barriers and \ncontroversy. \nFifthly, and most strikingly – this is very funny –, the same examination was required \nfor both opticians and optometrists, despite the clear difference in their training and scope of \npractice. So, it is a set of paper which is prepared, and both the opticians and the optometrists \nhave to take part in the same examination. It appears as if cardiac surgeons, skin specialists \nand surgeons, all of them have to take part in the same examination. Madam Speaker, this is \nnot standardisation. It is misclassification, and frankly, it is ludicrous to subject two \nfundamentally different professions to an identical assessment. \nSixthly, internationally, countries such as India and France – both key partners in the \ntraining of our health professionals – do not require such examinations for registration. They \nrely on accredited qualifications and structured regulatory systems. Mauritius is aligning \nitself with these practical and established models. \nSeventhly, the possibility of using an independent external examination body was \nindeed considered. However, this raises significant practical challenges. There are clear cost \nimplications both for the State and for candidates. Furthermore, given that countries like \nIndia and France do not operate such examination systems, there is no obvious partner \ninstitution readily available to provide such services. \nMadam Speaker, one must also consider the practical complexity of arranging such \nexaminations. Would we need to engage separate external bodies for opticians, optometrists, \nand orthoptists? This would introduce fragmentation, increase costs and administrative \ninefficiency without clear benefit. \nThis reform is about removing an opaque, inconsistent and unjustified barrier, and \nreplacing it with a system grounded in recognised qualifications, fairness and modern \nregulatory principles. Regulation must ensure competence, not create artificial hurdles. This \namendment restores credibility, coherence and fairness to the system. \nWe have heard claims that removing examinations will lower standards. We have heard \nabout it, but this is not correct. As I have just mentioned, there are countries with well-\nestablished optical sectors, which do not rely on standalone licensing examinations imposed \nby regulatory bodies. \nRather, we have to rely on – \n \naccredited qualifications; \n \nstructured training, and  \n \ninstitutional oversight. \nMauritius is not lowering its standards. We are aligning with global best practices. \nWhen registration was carried out under the Optical Registration Board, we did not encounter \nany problem with quality of care or patients’ safety. \nAs I have just mentioned, currently, we have a number of Allied Health Professionals \nwho were doing very well without undergoing those examinations, but they are being \ncontrolled by the professional bodies. \nAs far as the composition of the Council is concerned, I heard the Leader of the \nOpposition; he drew our attention on one point: that there is an attempt from us to \nmonopolise the Council. But, previously, out of 15 members, six were from the private sector \nand nine was from the Government. That has been the case till now.  \nIn the new one, we have 13 members: six from the private sector and seven from the \nGovernment. In all the councils that we have or on any board, it is always the Government \nthat has at least an advantage over the others. If we are not going to maintain it, then we are \ndoomed. They will do whatever they like. So, out of 13 members, if they have six and we \nhave seven, which includes representatives of the Prime Minister’s Office, the Ministry of \nFinance, the Attorney General’s Office, my Ministry, plus two independent members, as has \nalways been the case, I do not find anything wrong in that. So, let us be frank and we stop \ndeceit. \nThis Bill further introduces – \n \nbroader representation; \n \nstronger accountability, and  \n \nalignment with national health priorities. \nA regulator exists to protect the public – not to function as a closed circle of \npractitioners. \nIt has been suggested that the Government is trying to its will upon them, but that is not \ntrue. This is really misleading. We have always worked in this way. What this Bill does is \nclarify and rationalise that representation. We are not introducing anything new. \nAs far as the definition of “optometry” is concerned, the Leader of the Opposition \nmentioned about it, but this is nonsensical because the definition is very well spelt out in the \nAct. \nUnder the previous framework, opticians and optometrists were required to take – as I \nhave mentioned – the same examination despite having fundamentally different levels of \ntraining and clinical responsibilities. This created a situation where unequal roles were treated \nas equivalent, which is neither logical nor safe. An optician is primarily a technician – a \ntechnical professional involved in dispensing and fitting optical devices, whereas an \noptometrist is a clinically trained practitioner capable of assessing vision and detecting eye \ndisease. To subject both of them to the same assessment standard is not standardisation. It is \nmiscalculation. \nMadam Speaker, the amendment corrects this by recognising the different \ncompetencies required, appropriately differentiated pathways of assessment and regulation. \nThis strengthens, not weakens, professional standards. It ensures that patients clearly \nunderstand who is providing their care. Practitioners are assessed according to their actual \nscope of practice. Regulatory systems reflect real world clinical distinctions. As far as \ncreating division, this amendment restores coherence, protects patients’ safety and aligns the \nsystem with sound regulatory principles.  \nMadam Speaker, eye care, today, is delivered through a multi-disciplinary model. \nOrthoptists play a critical role in diagnosing and managing visual disorders, particularly in \nchildren and neurological condition. Bringing them under the Council to choose uniform \nstandards of care, proper accountability, enhanced patient safety. This is a necessary step \ntowards an integrated and modern eye care system. \nIn any modern healthcare system, multidisciplinary oversight is essential. The presence \nof an ophthalmologist strengthens – \n clinical governance; \n patient safety, and \n integration across services. \nTo oppose this is to oppose progress in healthcare delivery. \nMadam Speaker, the removal of a rigid statutory definition of the practice of optometry \nis a deliberate and well-founded decision grounded in sound legislative principle. Firstly, \nhealth care practice, whether in optometry or medicine, is not static. It evolves continuously \nwith advances in technology, new diagnostic tools, changing models of care. To fix a detailed \ndefinition in primary legislation, is to freeze a dynamic profession in time rendering the law \nquickly outdated.  \nIn parallel with practice of medicine, Madam Speaker, we do not define the practice of \nmedicine in rigid exhaustive terms within legislation. We do not attempt to list every \ndiagnostic act, every procedure, every evolving intervention, instead the law recognises the \nprofession broadly and trust regulatory bodies to define scope of practice, standards and \ncompetencies. The same principle applies here. By removing a fixed definition, the Bill \navoids legislative rigidity, empowers regulatory body, ensures relevance over time.  \nAddressing concerns of ambiguity, Madam Speaker, this does not create a vacuum. The \nscope of practice will be clearly defined through regulations, guidelines and professional \nstandards linked to training and competence, subject to regulatory oversight and discipline. \nThis is a controlled flexibility, not uncertainty. Regulations define who is qualified and \naccountable, not to attempt to exhaustively define every act they may perform. \nMadam Speaker, just as we do not confine the practice of medicine within rigid \nstatutory wording, we should not constrain optometry. A modern law must enable a \nprofession to evolve, not trap it in definition that would be obsolete tomorrow. \nMadam Speaker, it is both surprising and deeply concerning that certain members of \nOptical Council appear not to understand the most basic function of the very body on which \nthey sit. The Optical Council is not mandated to regulate optical shops. Its role is to regulate \nprofessionals, not commercial enterprises. To suggest otherwise reflects either a profound \nmisunderstanding of the law or a deliberate attempt to blur responsibilities for convenience. \nRegulations for optical shops falls squarely within the scope of other appropriate legislations \nand this is being looked into. What we are doing through this reform is restoring clarity, \nprofessional regulations where it belongs, an institutional and commercial regulations where \nit must be exercised. Let us be clear, confusing these roles does not protect patient, it weakens \noversight. This Bill corrects that.  \nThe real issue: resistance to change. Madam Speaker, a clear pattern emerges from the \ncriticisms we have heard. Every reform is portrayed as a threat; reform of entry is a threat; \nreform of governance is a threat; reform of oversight is a threat, but what is never \nacknowledge is the risk of doing nothing. A system that restricts entry, lack transparency and \nresist evolution is itself the greatest threat to patient care. \nFor the summing up, I would say that this Bill not about weakening the profession. It is \nabout strengthening the system. It is about ensuring that regulation serves – \n \nthe patient; \n \nthe public interest, and \n \nthe future of healthcare. \nToday we are, with this Bill, and most probably tomorrow we will come with a Bill to \nlook at the Medical Council as well because we have a multiplicity of problems in Medical \nCouncil, Madam Speaker. Those who resist reforms must ask themselves: are they defending \nstandards or defending control? \nThis Government will always stand – \n \nfor patients over privilege; \n \nfor transparency over opacity; \n \nfor progress over stagnation. \nI, therefore, commend this Bill to the House. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nBill read a second time and committed. \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(Madam Speaker in the Chair) \nThe Optical Council (Amendment) Bill (No. I of 2026) was considered and agreed to. \n On the Assembly resuming with Madam Speaker in the Chair, Madam Speaker \nreported accordingly. \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Optical Council (Amendment) Bill (No. I of 2026) \nwas read a third time and passed. \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Tuesday 31 March 2026 at 11.30 a.m. \nMr Mohamed rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned! \nAt 7.04 p.m. the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 31 March 2026 at \n11.30 a.m. \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nMONEY LAUNDERING – DRUG TRAFFICKING PROCEEDS – ARRESTS & \nSEIZED VEHICLES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/115",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 115,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/115) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \nwhether, in regard to the residential care homes, he will state the – \n(a) \ncurrent number thereof being – \n(i) \nregistered, and  \n(ii) \nunregistered;  \n(b) \nfrequency of inspections carried out thereat by his Ministry, indicating the \nnumber of cases of non-compliance or abuse detected in the course thereof and \nthe actions taken in relation thereto in each case, and  \n(c) \npolicy framework put in place to ensure compliance with hygiene and safety \nstandards for residents.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nYOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT – RATE – EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY \nPROGRAMMES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/116",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 116,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "B/116\nThe Honourable First Member for Port-Louis Maritime and Port \nLouis East (Mr Juman)  \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, \nBlue Economy and Fisheries – \n \nWhether, in regard to potato seeds, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Agricultural Marketing Board, \ninformation as to the quality and quantity thereof put on sale \nto planters for the 2025 Planting Season, indicating the \nnumber of complaints registered from the planters as to the \nquality thereof and the measures taken in relation thereto?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/117",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 117,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/117) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to youth \nunemployment, he will state – \n(a) \nthe current rate thereof by gender, region and educational level, and  \n(b) \noutline the programmes being implemented to promote employment opportunities \nfor young graduates.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUES – PORT MATHURIN – DEVELOPMENT PROJECT – \nIMPLEMENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/118",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 118,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/118) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to Port \nMathurin, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Ports Authority, \ninformation as to whether there is a project for the development thereof and, if so, give details \nthereof and the implementation timeline therefor.",
      "answer": "Reply by the Prime Minister: I shall reply to Parliamentary Questions B/118 and \nB/132 together as they relate to the same subject matter.  \nThe Mauritius Ports Authority is required under Section 5 of the Ports Act to prepare \nand periodically update a port master plan for Mauritius and Rodrigues with a view to \nformulating its policy for port development and land use.  \nThe Port Master Plan 2024 for Port Mathurin recommends short to medium term \nmeasures to make optimum use of the existing facilities thereat.  These include – \n(i) \nincreasing the container stacking height;  \n(ii) \nintegrating the ex-slaughterhouse area and ex-marketplace area within the \ncontainer yard; \n(iii) creating an off-dock container freight station, and \n(iv) re-arranging the container yard.  \nThe container traffic for the year 2025 stood at 15,759 Twenty-Foot Equivalent Units at \nPort Mathurin and with the implementation of these combined measures, the capacity of the \nport would increase to approximately 32,800 Twenty-Foot Equivalent Units.  \nThe Mauritius Shipping Corporation Ltd has been entrusted with the responsibility of \nimplementing these measures which would address the issue of congestion. In this context, \nthe Mauritius Ports Authority has earmarked a total area of about 5,500 m2 of land within the \nPort area for that purpose.  \nI am informed that the Mauritius Shipping Corporation Ltd has appointed a consultant \non 30 June 2025 for the planning and design of the project which would include the \nexpansion of storage capacity of the yard, construction of a modern depot and a warehouse, \nupgrading of infrastructure and acquisition of cargo handling equipment. The Report was \nsubmitted by the Mauritius Shipping Corporation Ltd to the Mauritius Ports Authority on 15 \nOctober 2025, for its consideration. Upon vesting of the land which is expected in July 2026, \nthe Mauritius Shipping Corporation Ltd would initiate procedures in September 2026 for the \nexecution of the works. This project is expected to be completed by June 2028. \nMoreover, to improve the delivery of containers, the Mauritius Ports Authority has also \nidentified the existing ex-boat yard site, presently occupied by the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly, for the development of a container freight station which will allow all stuffing and \ndestuffing activities to be undertaken thereat. Discussions are ongoing for the Rodrigues \nRegional Assembly to relinquish its leasehold rights for subsequent allocation to Mauritius \nShipping Corporation Ltd to develop the container freight station. \nI am further informed by the Mauritius Shipping Corporation Ltd that with a view to \nincreasing efficiency, an amount of Rs14.7 million has been earmarked by Port Associated \nand Portage Operations, Lighterage & Cargo Services Ltd (PAPOL), one of its service \nproviders, for the replacement of container handling equipment. To that effect, in December \n2025, one 45 tonnes Reach Stacker had been shipped to Port Mathurin. Two tractor trucks, \none seven tonnes Forklift and one trailer are expected be shipped thereto in April 2026. The \ncoming into operation of these equipment would have a positive impact on the port \noperations and the delivery of the cargoes to consignees. \nIn addition, I am informed that the Mauritius Ports Authority is presently in the process \nof acquiring four small tugs, at the estimated cost of Rs150 million each. One of these tugs \nwould be positioned at Port Mathurin to improve operational efficiency. Commissioning is \nexpected by mid-2028.  \nThe Port Master Plan 2024 for Port Mathurin equally recommends in the long-term, the \nconstruction of a new commercial quay and associated terminal facilities. The new \ndevelopment, requiring an investment of approximately Rs4.6 billion, would include, inter-\nalia, the construction of a 175-metre-long commercial quay with associated dredging and \nreclamation works, container stacking area and port administration and passenger terminal \nbuilding.  \nAs I indicated in the reply to Parliamentary Question B/915 on 28 October 2025, these \nrecommendations would be considered as part of the modernisation process to develop our \nports. \nCHILD DEVELOPMENT UNIT – CHILDREN IN PUBLIC HOSPITALS – \nEDUCATIONAL FOLLOW-UP",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/119",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 119,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "B/119\nThe \nHonourable \nThird \nMember \nfor \nRodrigues  \n(Mrs Henriette-Manan) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of National Infrastructure – \n \nWhether, in regard to Rodrigues Island, he will (a) for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the National Development \nUnit, informaton as to whether an assessment of the drainage \nworks implemented thereat has been carried out, giving \ndetails of the adequacy and effectiveness of the existing \ndrainage system, particularly in the vicinity of the  \nQueen Elizabeth Hospital and (b) state whether consideration \nwill be given for the taking of urgent remedial and upgrading \nworks to mitigate flood risks to ensure the safety and \ncontinuity of critical medical services at the hospital?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": "NOT ANSWERED",
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-21-april-2026"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/120",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 120,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/120) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port-Louis Maritime & Port Louis \nEast) asked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to \nchildren currently placed in public hospitals by the Child Development Unit, she will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to the number thereof who, to date, present no \nhealth issues, indicating – \n(a)  the public hospitals where they are currently placed;  \n(b)  the duration of stay;  \n(c)  since when they are missing classes, and  \n(d)  whether arrangements have been/are being made, in collaboration with the \nMinistry of Education and Human Resource, to ensure that they continue their \neducation while in hospital.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBROWN SEQUARD HOSPITAL – UNCLAIMED CORPSES – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/121",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 121,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "B/121\nThe Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River  \n(Mr Jugurnauth)  \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Energy and Public Utilities – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Mont Blanc Water Treatment Plant, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central \nWater Authority, information as to whether (a) in case of \nexcess water demand from the villages of Chemin Grenier, \nSurinam, Riambel, Chamouny, Rivière des Galets, Bel Ombre \nand Baie du Cap over supply from the said water plant, the \nalternatives \npresently \navailable \nto \nsatisfy \nsame \nand  \n(b) consideration will be given for the carrying out of a site \nvisit thereat with the relevant authorities to address the \nmatter? \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                     PAGE 15 of 23 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/122",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 122,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "B/122\nThe Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River  \n(Mr Jugurnauth)  \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Tamarin dispensary, he will state the \n(a) state of the infrastructure thereof and (b) services \nprovided thereat?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/123",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 123,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/123) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Brown Sequard \nHospital, he will state the current number of unclaimed corpses in its mortuary, indicating \nsince when they have been lying there and the measures being envisaged to deal with this \nissue and whether his Ministry is in presence of requests from medical colleges to be handed \nover same for research purposes and, if so, where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nHeForShe CLUBS – COMMUNITY CENTRES – COMPOSITION – PROJECTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/124",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 124,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/124) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the \nHeForShe Clubs, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the \nCommunity Centres wherein such clubs have been established, indicating in the case of each \nclub the – \n(a)  composition of the executive committee, and  \n(b)  projects undertaken.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nELECTRONIC MONITORING BRACELETS – IMPLEMENTATION – PROPOSED \nTIMEFRAME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/125",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 125,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/125) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nAttorney-General whether, in regard to the use of electronic monitoring bracelets, he will \nstate where matters stand as to the – \n(a) \nimplementation thereof, indicating the reasons – \n(i)  why the relevant provisions for electronic monitoring have not yet been \nproclaimed or put into operation as at to date, and  \n(ii)  for the absence of regulations defining the operational protocols and \nmonitoring procedures, and  \n(b)  proposed timeframe for the full implementation thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBRITANNIA POST OFFICE – RENOVATION – EXPECTED REOPENING DATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/126",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 126,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/126) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation \nwhether, in regard to the proposed renovation of the Britannia Post Office, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from Mauritius Post Ltd., information as to the duration thereof \nand expected date of reopening thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMORC. LA CONFIANCE, BEAU-BASSIN – FOOTBALL PLAYGROUND – \nRENOVATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/127",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 127,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "B/127\nThe Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and \nMontagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)  \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, \nBlue Economy and Fisheries – \n \nWhether, in regard to dogs, he will (a) for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Mauritius Society for Animal Welfare, \ninformation as to the number thereof (i) registered and  \n(ii) captured, indicating the number thereof having been \nneutered, euthanised, adopted or placed in shelters, since \nNovember 2024 to date and (b) state where matters stand \nregarding the proposed registration thereof with private \nveterinary practitioners?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/128",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 128,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "B/128\nThe Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne \nLongue (Mr Caserne)  \n \nTo ask the Honourable the Attorney-General –  \n \nWhether, in regard to the Certificate of Character, he will state \nwhether consideration will be given for the revision \ndownwards of the period for the waiver of convictions for \nminor offenses or non-custodial sentences thereon?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/129",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 129,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/129) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the renovation of the football \nplayground at Morcellement La Confiance, in Beau-Bassin, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Municipal Council of Beau Bassin/Rose Hill, information as to where \nmatters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFATF & ESAAMLG – GREY LIST RISK – STRATEGIC/TECHNICAL \nDEFICIENCIES & MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/130",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 130,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "B/130\nThe Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart \n(Dr Prayag)  \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of National Infrastructure – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Beau Plateau bypass linking Cottage \nto Goodlands, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \nthe Road Development Authority, information as to where \nmatters stand regarding the (a) request  for the classification \nthereof as  “Classified Road” and (b) implementation of \nproposed works thereat with a view  to reducing road traffic \naccidents thereat?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/131",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 131,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/131) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & \nTriolet) asked the Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning \nwhether, in regard to the risk of the Republic of Mauritius being grey-listed by \nthe Financial Action Task Force or the Eastern and Southern Africa Anti-\nMoney Laundering Group, she will state the specific strategic or technical \ndeficiencies identified, the concrete measures undertaken by her Ministry to \naddress such deficiencies, and Government’s roadmap and timeline for the full \nimplementation of all outstanding action items required to ensure the \njurisdiction’s compliance with international Anti-Money Laundering and \nCombating the Financing of Terrorism standards.",
      "answer": "Reply: I would like to be a bit elaborate in my reply, as this question, if not \nproperly addressed, may have a negative impact on the Financial Services \nSector.  \nThis Government is firmly committed to building, strengthening and \nsustaining a robust, credible and effective Anti-Money Laundering and \nCountering the Financing of Terrorism framework. This is not only a policy \npriority, but a strategic choice to safeguard the integrity of our financial system \nand preserve Mauritius’ standing as a trusted international financial centre. The \nfinancial services sector currently contributes 12.5% to GDP as at December \n2025 with a net growth of 4.8%, generates over 60% of total corporate tax \nrevenues, amounting to MUR 15.4 billion and supports direct employment for \nmore than 19,000 professionals in Mauritius. \n As you are aware, in February 2020, Mauritius was placed on the FATF \ngrey list following the identification of five key strategic deficiencies.  These \nrelated primarily to weaknesses in the risk-based supervision of non-bank \nfinancial institutions and designated non-financial businesses and professions, \ngaps in ensuring access to accurate and up-to-date basic and beneficial \nownership information, including its verification by competent authorities, the \nneed to demonstrate that law enforcement agencies were effectively conduction \nmoney laundering investigations, including parallel financial investigations and \ncomplex cases, as well as shortcomings in implementing a risk-based approach \nto targeted financial sanctions through adequate outreach and supervision. \nThis is why this Government has, as soon as, it assumed office taken all \nnecessary steps to ensure that Mauritius has a robust and up-to-date \nAML/CFT/CPF regime.  The second National Risk Assessment which was \nsupposed to have been carried out in 2022 was not yet done.  Recognising the \nurgency and its critical importance, I intervened directly to unblock the \nprocesses, ensure full coordination across institutions, and monitored its \ncompletion. As a result, the second National Risk Assessment exercise was \ncompleted in May 2025 and subsequently released, providing Mauritius with an \nup to date understanding of its ML and TF risks to guide policy, supervision and \nenforcement actions. In addition, a number of sectoral risk assessments have \nbeen undertaken, with several already completed and others scheduled for \nfinalisation by June 2026.  \nThis is essential because risks are not static. They evolve, and new threats \ncontinue to emerge, particularly for a jurisdiction such as Mauritius with a \nstrong international financial services sector. It is, therefore, no longer sufficient \nto rely on historical data or past reforms. \nTo ensure a structured and forward-looking approach, Government has \napproved the National AML/CFT Strategy for the period 2026 to 2029.  The \nNational Strategy outlines specific actions to enhance the country’s \neffectiveness in mitigating risks.  It reflects Government’s proactive approach \ntowards maintaining economic and financial integrity as well as strengthening \nnational security.  This is supported by a National Action Plan, which sets out \nthe responsibilities of each institution to strengthen our regime. In addition, a \nMutual Evaluation Roadmap has been developed as part of our preparatory \nefforts in 2025. This roadmap serves as a practical tool to map key milestones, \nassign responsibilities, track progress and ensure that Mauritius is prepared \nahead of the 2027 Mutual Evaluation.  \nStrong governance and oversight are at the heart of this process. A robust \ncoordination mechanism is in place, with the National Committee on \nAML/CFT/CPF comprising representatives of all competent authorities meeting \non a monthly basis under the Chairmanship of the Senior Chief Executive of my \nMinistry.  Secondly, the Core Group on AML/CFT, comprising all relevant \nheads of key institutions under the Chairmanship of the Financial Secretary is \nalso meeting monthly.  Thirdly, the Inter-Ministerial Committee, co-chaired by \nthe Attorney General and myself, meets every two months. This ensures close \nmonitoring of progress, timely resolution of bottlenecks, and sustained high-\nlevel political oversight. It is a clear demonstration of the importance that \nGovernment attaches to this work. \nAt the operational level, several important reforms are underway. These \ninclude the establishment of a central register of trusts under the Financial \nServices Commission, the development of a Centralised Information \nManagement System (CIMS) at the level of my Ministry, and the continuous \ntraining and capacity-building of officers to ensure that they remain abreast of \nevolving FATF standards and methodology. At the same time, public–private \nengagement has been significantly strengthened to support financial institutions \nand designated non-financial businesses and professions in enhancing their \ncompliance and risk understanding.  \nFurthermore, Mauritius is actively engaging with international partners, \nincluding peer jurisdictions such as Latvia and India, which have recently \nundergone their Mutual Evaluations, in order to benefit from their experience \nand best practices in preparing for the assessment process. \nPreparations for the 2027 Mutual Evaluation are well underway. A \ncomprehensive Technical Compliance Assessment was conducted in 2025 \nbased on the revised FATF methodology. This exercise enabled us to identify \nany legislative gaps, particularly in relation to the 12 revised FATF \nRecommendations. An AML/CFT/CPF (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill has \nbeen introduced to ensure continued alignment with international standards. \nA key milestone in our preparation is the Mid-Term Independent Review \nExercise commissioned by my Ministry. This exercise was designed to mirror \nthe actual Mutual Evaluation process and was conducted in line with the 2025 \nrevised FATF methodology, with a primary focus on effectiveness across the \nImmediate Outcomes. This exercise has provided a clear and evidence-based \nroadmap to further strengthen our AML/CFT regime and reinforce Mauritius’ \nreadiness for the next Mutual Evaluation cycle.  \nHere I must emphasise that the Mutual Evaluation will start in February \n2027 with an on-site visit of ESAAMLG Assessors planned for February/March \n2028.  In case any deficiency is identified in our AML/CFT/CPF regime, the \ncountry will be placed in the Post Observation Period for 1 year between \nOctober 2028 to October 2029.  In the case these deficiencies are still not \naddressed, the FATF may place the jurisdiction in the Grey list in February \n2030. \nBased on the findings of this Mid-Term Independent Review Exercise, an \nAction Plan has been developed and formally adopted by the National \nCommittee, chaired by my Ministry. The implementation and operationalisation \nof this Action Plan by the 16 competent authorities are being closely monitored \nthrough established coordination mechanisms, with oversight by the Inter-\nMinisterial Committee. \nIt is important to emphasise that these efforts are not undertaken merely for \nthe purpose of an assessment. They are fundamental to safeguarding the \nintegrity of our financial system, protecting the reputation of Mauritius, and \nensuring continued investor confidence. Our reputation as a trusted international \nfinancial centre has been built over many years through the combined efforts of \nGovernment and the private sector, and it is our collective responsibility to \npreserve and strengthen it. \nThis requires a sustained, whole-of-government approach, strong public-\nprivate partnership, and continued vigilance. Mauritius has demonstrated that it \ncan reform decisively and deliver results. The challenge now is to sustain these \ngains and translate them into measurable effectiveness. \nLet me emphasise the need for responsible behaviour in our rhetoric. This \nis an issue of national interest, not restricted to just the financial services sector.  \nThere are wider economic consequences which includes adverse impact on our \nForeign Direct Investment flow, our banking deposits, our liquidity, our balance \nof payments, and foreign exchange stability. \nWe need to be mindful that due to ignorance of such a technical subject, \nwe do not scare investors and put at risk by our irresponsible narrative at a time \nwhen we need to grow a sector which is our best performing sector and at a time \nwhen opportunities are at the doorstep in regard to what is happening in the \nMiddle East region. \n \nRODRIGUES – CONTAINER PARK – MOVEMENT CONGESTION MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/132",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 132,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/132) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to the \ncontainer park in Rodrigues Island, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nMauritius Ports Authority, information as to the measures being envisaged to relieve \nmovement congestion thereat, indicating the timeline therefor.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/118) \nRODRIGUES – LAND DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN – PROJECT STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/133",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 133,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/133) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nNational Infrastructure whether, in regard to the implementation of the Land Drainage Master \nPlan and National Development Unit Projects for Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nNATIONAL PENSIONS FUND – BALANCE & RETURN ON INVESTMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/134",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 134,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "B/134\nThe Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Commerce and Consumer \nProtection – \n \nWhether, in regard to the proposed construction of a modern \nwarehouse for the storage of essential commodities, including \nfood items and of a petroleum storage facility in Rodrigues \nIsland, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nState Trading Corporation, information as to where matters \nstand?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/135",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 135,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/135) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port-Louis Maritime & Port-Louis \nEast) asked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \nwhether, in regard to the National Pensions Fund, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain information as to the – \n(a) \nbalance currently standing to the credit thereof, and \n(b) \nreturn on investment thereof in the last financial year.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nGRAND SABLE FOOTBALL GROUND – LIGHTING FACILITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/136",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 136,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "B/136\nThe Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart \n(Dr Prayag)  \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Local Government – \n \nWhether, in regard to the construction of the Rivière du \nRempart Market, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the District Council of Rivière du Rempart, information \nas to the (a) amount paid to the contractor thereof as at to date \n(b) project cost thereof and (c) names of legal Counsel whose \nservices have been retained in relation to the dispute in \nrelation thereto against the contractor and the quantum of \nfees paid out thereto?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/137",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 137,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "B/137\nThe Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne \nLongue (Mr Caserne)  \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Land Transport – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Public Service Vehicle (Taxi) License, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National \nLand Transport Authority, information as to whether \nconsideration will be given for the issuance thereof for \noperation in Bois Marchand and, if so, when and, if not, why \nnot? \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                     PAGE 19 of 23 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/138",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 138,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/138) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose \nBelle) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the project for the \ninstallation of lighting facilities at the football ground of Grand Sable, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the District Council of Grand Port, information as to the \nexpected date of implementation thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nMAURITIAN GLOBAL BUSINESS SECTOR – INDIAN SUPREME COURT \nJUDGMENT – IMPACT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/139",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 139,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/139) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the Mauritian \nGlobal Business Sector, she will state if her Ministry has conducted a thorough and detailed \nassessment of the impact of the recent judgment of the Supreme Court of India in the case \nof Tiger Global International II Holdings vs. The Authority for Advance Rulings thereon, \nparticularly concerning the future eligibility of Mauritius-resident entities for capital gains \ntax exemptions under the India-Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nPENALTY POINT SYSTEM – IMPLEMENTATION OUTCOME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/140",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 140,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/140) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Penalty Point System \neffective from January 31, 2026, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as \nto the outcome of the implementation thereof as at to date.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nROAD CONGESTION – STUDY – DECONGESTION STRATEGY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/141",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 141,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/141) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to road congestion, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Road Development Authority, information as to \nwhether a study has been carried out to identify the reasons thereof and, if so, indicate the \noutcome thereof and the road decongestion strategy put in place.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nLOCALLY PRODUCED GOODS – EXPORT VOLUME & VALUE – GDP \nCONTRIBUTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/142",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 142,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "B/142\nThe Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne \nLongue (Mr Caserne)  \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Information Technology, \nCommunication and Innovation –  \n \nWhether, in regard to the Post Offices in Port Louis, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from Mauritius Post Ltd., \ninformation as to the number of backlogs of letters/parcels \nlying thereat, indicating the reasons therefor and the urgent \nremedial measures being taken for the delivery thereof?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/143",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 143,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade",
      "question": "(No. B/143) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade whether, in \nregard to exports of goods produced locally, he will state the total volume and value thereof \nin respect of each of the past five years, indicating the – \n(a) \ncontribution thereof to the Gross Domestic Product, and  \n(b) \nnumber of persons employed directly and indirectly in export-oriented sectors in \nMauritius.",
      "answer": "Reply: At the outset, let me underline that Export-Oriented Enterprises (EOE) still \nconstitute a vital segment of the Mauritian economy, acting as a major pillar for industrial \ndevelopment, foreign exchange earnings, and employment. The value of exports by Export \nOriented Enterprises amounted around Rs42.2 billion for the year 2025 (as per latest \nestimates).  \nOn the whole, the EOE Sector accounted for around 27% of Manufacturing value \nadded in 2025. Also Manufacturing sector as a whole accounted for 11.1% of GDP in 2025. \nI am placing in the library of the National Assembly the information pertaining to total \nvalue of EOE exports, as well as volume and value exported by the three main Export \nOriented Sectors, namely Fish and Fish Preparations, Textile Yarn and Fabrics and Apparel. \nExports by these three sectors (in terms of value and volume) have decreased during the \n2021-2025 period. \nRegarding part (a) of the question, the contribution of Export Oriented Enterprises as a \npercentage of GDP at market prices was estimated at around 3% for the year (as per latest \nestimates). It has been on a declining trend since the year 2021 whereby the contribution to \nGDP stood at 3.9%. There are numerous factors which account for this decline including the \nreduced consumer spending in our main export markets especially Europe as a result of the \nwar in Ukraine; impact of the reciprocal tariff imposed by the US; rising cost of production \nand increasing competition from low-cost producers. The geopolitical tensions in the Middle \nEast are expected to worsen the situation. \nRegarding part (b) of the question, the Export Oriented enterprises continue to be a vital \nemployer, with 224 companies employing roughly 28,434 people as at September 2025. \nHowever, employment in the export sector decreased over the five-year period. For the year \n2021, employment stood at 35,024. Allow me to underline that Statistics Mauritius does \npublish indirect employment figures for inter sectoral linkages.   \nOVERSEAS MEDICAL TREATMENT – REGISTERED ORGANISATIONS & \nMEDICAL INSTITUTIONS – AUDIT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/144",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 144,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/144) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port-Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to Mauritian nationals \nproceeding overseas for medical treatment, he will state the number thereof over the past \nthree years, indicating – \n(a) \nwhether his Ministry has a list of the medical institutions attended; \n(b) \nthe names of the organisations offering private medical services overseas and \nwhether they are registered with his Ministry, and \n(c) \nwhether an audit of the outcome of treatment proposed thereto has been carried \nout.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMIDDLE EAST GEOPOLITICAL SITUATION – FOOD SECURITY – \nCONTINGENCY PLAN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/145",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 145,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "B/145\nThe Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart \n(Dr Prayag)  \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Local Government – \n \nWhether, in regard to roads in Constituency No. 7, Piton \nRivière du Rempart which required resurfacing but crusher \nrun were laid instead since June 2025 to date, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to the quantity \nthereof allocated per site? \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                     PAGE 21 of 23 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/146",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 146,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "B/146\nThe Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Youth and Sports –  \n \nWhether, in regard to the recent official mission he undertook \nto Rodrigues Island, he will state the (a) composition of the \naccompanying delegation, indicating the capacity in which \neach member thereof attended and (b) purpose and outcomes \nthereof?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/147",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 147,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/147) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nwhether, in regard to food security, he will state the contingency plan being put in place, if \nany, in the light of the current geopolitical situation.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nTAXI OPERATORS WELFARE FUND – MEMBERS & BENEFICIARIES – \nCONTRIBUTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/148",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 148,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/148) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Taxi Operators Welfare Fund, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe current number of members thereof; \n(b) \nthe quantum of contributions collected from taxi operators since the inception \nthereof to date, indicating the total amount disbursed therefrom under each \nscheme and the corresponding number of beneficiaries, and \n(c) \nwhether a review regarding contribution thereto is being envisaged and, if so, \nindicate where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nNADC – DRUGS ADDICTION – REHABILITATION PROGRAMMES & STATEGY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/5",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 5,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. A/5) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to drug \naddiction, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Agency for Drug \nControl, information as to the rehabilitation programmes being envisaged in relation thereto, \nindicating if an implementation strategy has been developed therefor and, if so, give details \nthereof in terms of timeline and in relation to children aged 12 to 18 years addicted to \nsynthetic drugs.",
      "answer": "Reply: The National Agency for Drug Control (NADC) has informed that the current \nRehabilitation Programme is offered by the Ministry of Health and Wellness and Non-\nGovernmental Organisations (NGOs), through the following facilities and involve both \npharmacological and psychosocial interventions – \n(a). Nénuphar Centre in Long Mountain specifically caters for young people under 18 \nwith drug abuse issues. It offers treatment and rehabilitation services on a \nresidential basis and outpatient basis;  \n(b). Frangipane Centre, located next to Brown Sequard Mental Health Care Centre \nprovides both residential and day care rehabilitation, Methadone Induction \nservices and detoxification services, and \n(c). Orchidée Centre, located next to Brown Sequard Mental Health Care Centre \noffers Day Care and residential rehabilitation, Methadone Induction and \ndetoxification services to women who use drugs. \nThe rehabilitation process includes psychotherapy carried out by psychologists and \npsychosocial accompaniment by social workers from various NGOs. \nWith the setting up of the NADC in May 2025, the Agency is envisaging the \nimplementation of a standard National Programme for Rehabilitation and Reintegration of \nPersons Who Use Drugs as a coordinated, recovery-oriented and sustainable national \nframework.  \nThe rehabilitation services envisaged under this framework include linkages to \nrehabilitation services at grass root level, notably through the National Drug Assistance \nHotline, the Ministry of Health and Wellness, NGOs, the private sector and other \nstakeholders. The programme will consist of assessment, appropriate treatment, as well as \nstructured rehabilitation services and psychosocial follow-up. It also comprises reintegration \nand recovery support services, including halfway homes, vocational linkage, family \nreintegration, community follow-up and employment support. \nWith regard to the implementation strategy, a phased approach will be adopted for the \nperiod April 2026 to December 2027. In 2026, emphasis is being placed on establishing the \noperational framework, including the development of standard operating procedures and \nreferral pathways. By December 2027, the objective is to have the core national rehabilitation \nand reintegration framework operational completely, including patients referred by the Drug \nUsers Administrative Panel (DUAP) in the reintegration pathways.   \nFollowing a proposal by the NADC, discussions are also underway with Ministry of \nHealth and Wellness to convert an existing ward at Bruno Cheong hospital to cater for \ninpatient services for young people on synthetic drugs. This will serve as a model National \nRehabilitation Centre. \nAs regards children aged 12 to 18 years affected by synthetic drug use, this category is \nbeing given specific attention under this Programme. The new programme will strengthen \nage-appropriate services at Nénuphar Centre, including adolescent-friendly treatment, \neducational continuity, school reintegration support and structured reintegration planning into \nfamily and the community. \nFurthermore, central to this effort, a national study is being proposed by NADC, in \ncollaboration with relevant stakeholders and NGOs, to assess the prevalence of drug use \namong 12 to 18 years old. Based on the findings of the survey, tailored interventions, \nappropriate treatment and rehabilitation as well as reintegration services will be improved. \nMore generally, the Programme seeks to ensure that rehabilitation in Mauritius moves \nbeyond isolated treatment episodes and evolves into a coordinated national recovery system \nin which treatment, rehabilitation, aftercare and reintegration are linked in a structured and \nsustainable manner. \nRODRIGUES – FOUNDATION PROGRAMME IN LITERACY, NUMERACY & \nSKILLS – IMPLEMENTATION (GRADES 7-9)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/6",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 6,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. A/6) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the Foundation \nProgramme in Literacy, Numeracy and Skills, he will state the – \n(a) \nnumber and purpose of official visits undertaken to Rodrigues in relation thereto, \nand  \n(b) \nworkshops, consultations and capacity-building activities organised and \npartnerships established and the current level of readiness of teaching and \nlearning materials for students in Grades 7 to 9, since the launch thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: As regards part (a) of the question, I undertook an official visit to Rodrigues \nIsland from 20 to 24 February 2026 inter alia to take stock of progress achieved in the \nimplementation of the Foundation Programme in Literacy, Numeracy and Skills. \nDuring my visit, I participated in a roundtable discussion organised by the Deputy \nChief Commissioner of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly and attended by the Departmental \nHead (Education), Rectors, Deputy Rectors and Senior Educators of the Secondary Schools. \nThe deliberations focused on the philosophy of the Foundation Programme and the \nimportance of the setting up of a Monitoring Committee at school level to monitor the \nteaching and learning of the programme. \nAs for part (b) of the question, I am informed that two workshops/ consultations and \ntwo capacity-building activities were conducted with the local counterparts in Rodrigues by \ntechnicians of my Ministry along with Lecturers from the Mauritius Institute of Education \n(MIE) and officers from the Mauritius Examination Syndicate. A representative of the \nService Diocésain de l’Education Catholique was also present during one of the workshops. It \nis to be noted that my Ministry has an ongoing collaboration with the Commission of \nEducation of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly. \nI am further informed that the teaching and learning materials for students of Grades 7 \nto 9 for all subjects of the programme, including electives, are available on the website of the \nMIE. 18 out of 40 student workbooks have already been printed and are currently being \ndistributed to schools. The remaining workbooks are being printed and will be distributed to \nschools by the beginning of the second term of 2026. \nPUBLIC SECTOR RECRUITMENT – QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS – \nREVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/7",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 7,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms",
      "question": "(No. A/7) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms whether, in regard to \nrecruitment in the public sector, he will state whether consideration will be given for – \n(a) \na revision of the current five credits qualification requirement, including the \nEnglish Language, and  \n(b) \nthe acceptation of – \n(i) \nalternative qualifications equivalent to the school certificate and higher \nqualifications, including undergraduate degrees, and  \n(ii) \nthe two most recent qualifications.",
      "answer": "Reply: I wish to inform the House that any review of the existing qualifications \nrequirements at entry level requires a policy decision. \nIn this context, a preliminary consultation with relevant stakeholders, namely the Prime \nMinister’s Office, the Public Service Commission and Disciplined Forces Service \nCommission, the Ministry of Education and Human Resource and the Pay Research Bureau \nwas held on 23 February 2026. \nAccordingly, my Ministry issued a circular letter to Supervising Officers in-charge of \nMinistries/Departments requesting them to identify those grades in respect of which the \nqualifications requirements at the Cambridge School Certificate Level could be amended to \nspecify three credits instead of five credits. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I wish to apprise the House that currently, the \nCambridge General Certificate of Education at “Ordinary” and “Advanced” Levels are \nspecified as alternative to the School Certificate and the Higher School Certificate in all \nschemes of service where the School Certificate and the Higher School Certificate are \nspecified. \nAdditionally, provisions are also made in all schemes of service for equivalent \nqualifications acceptable to the service commissions to cater for those candidates who may \nnot possess the School Certificate, Higher School Certificate or the General Certificate of \nEducation at “Ordinary” and “Advanced” Levels or undergraduate degree, as the case may \nbe, but hold other qualifications which have been duly certified by the Higher Education \nCommission as being equivalent.  \nAs a general rule, qualifications to be specified in schemes of service are determined at \nthe level of Ministries/Departments. However, any qualification which has been duly \nrecognised by the Higher Education Commission is acceptable. \nI also wish to inform the House that as from the year 2012, in line with Government \ndecision at that time, only the highest qualification is specified in all schemes of service for \nentry grades in the public sector. For example, for posts requiring the School Certificate and \nthe Higher School Certificate, only the Higher School Certificate is specified as a \nrequirement. Similarly, for posts requiring a post Higher School Certificate and degree, only \nthe degree is specified except where qualifications at the lower level need to be prescribed in \nview of nature of duties to be performed, as in the education sector. \nIt is to be noted that the salary attached to each post in the public sector, which is \ngoverned by the Pay Research Bureau, is based to a large extent on the qualifications \nprescribed in the scheme of service for the post. Any review of the qualifications requirement \nat entry level would also need to take this factor into consideration as well as salary relativity \nbetween grades in the public sector. \nIn this context, my Ministry will hold further consultations with all relevant \nstakeholders as to the qualifications that could be considered as alternative equivalent \nqualifications to the existing qualifications requirements. \nMy Ministry will, thereafter, make appropriate recommendations to Cabinet for its \nagreement. \nRIPAILLES AREA HEALTH CENTRE – ACCESSIBILITY – RELOCATION \nPROPOSAL  \n\n159",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/8",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-24-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-24",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 8,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. A/8) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Ripailles Area Health \nCentre, he will state if consideration will be given for the – \n(a) \nprovision of adequate access for the disabled, suitable seating area, reliable and \nsecure electric installations and safe storage for medication, and  \n(b) \nrelocation thereof in the building currently housing the social welfare centre in \nNouvelle Decouverte.",
      "answer": "Reply: Ripailles Community Health Centre (CHC) is currently being accommodated in \na rented building of an extent of 1,000 square feet at Royal Road, Ripailles since 01 July \n2004. A lease agreement was signed with the owner on 27 July 2004 for a period of two years \nas from 01 July 2004, subject to renewal for further periods of two years. The rent has been \nrenewed since then. \nThe rented building no longer meets the requirements of a modern CHC given that \nthere are several shortcomings such as upgrading of electrical installations, provision of air \nconditioning in pharmacy, partitioning works in pharmacy, enlargement of gate, provision of \nramp, maintenance of openings and repairs to leakages and toilets. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, since 29 July 2024, the landlord was requested \nto carry out the upgrading works.  \nIn view of the reluctance of the landlord to carry out the upgrading works, two \nexpressions of interests were launched in October and December 2025, respectively, for \nshifting of the CHC to another location. However, both exercises have been unsuccessful. \nThe Ministry is still looking for an alternative site for the relocation of the CHC. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, the Ministry of Social Integration, Social \nSecurity and National Solidarity is being consulted on whether the CHC could be relocated in \nthe Social Welfare Centre situated at Nouvelle Decouverte.",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/149",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 149,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/149) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the incidents of 25 January 2026 at Palmar Public Beach, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to – \n(a) \nwhen was the request for police intervention received, indicating what followed; \n(b) \nthe reported number of persons present and allegedly contravening public order \nand noise pollution legislation, indicating the number thereof arrested and \nprovisionally charged; \n(c) \nwhy reinforcement was not mobilised, and \n(d) \nthe measures being contemplated to enhance law enforcement and maintenance \nof public order on public beaches.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed by the Commissioner of Police that on Sunday 25 January 2026 at about 15:50 \nhours, an anonymous call was received at the Trou d’Eau Douce Police Station requesting \nPolice intervention at Palmar Public Beach, where loud music was being played from several \nvehicles parked thereat, thereby causing a nuisance. \nA team from the Trou d’Eau Douce Police Station proceeded to Palmar Public Beach at \naround 16:00 hours. Upon arrival, Police Officers noticed several vehicles parked at the site, \nincluding one white car with its boot opened and playing very loud music. \nWhilst the Police Officers were making enquiries regarding the owner of the said \nvehicle, several persons who were nearby and consuming alcoholic beverages became hostile \nand attempted to obstruct the officers in the execution of their duties. At around 17:00 hours, \nthe Police Officers accordingly sought reinforcement and teams from the Emergency \nResponse Service, the Police du Tourisme and the Divisional Support Unit called to the \nlocation at around 18:15 hours to assist the officers. \nWith regard to parts (b) and (c) of the question, when Police Officers were attempting \nto establish contraventions, a crowd of around 250 persons gathered and some uttered abusive \nwords towards the Police and threw empty beer bottles as well as sand towards them and the \nPolice vehicles. One Police vehicle was slightly damaged. \nIn these circumstances, the Police Officers adopted a measured approach with a view to \navoiding direct confrontation with the hostile crowd, which was around 250, as I said. No \narrests could be effected at that time. The Police Officers withdrew from the immediate \nvicinity while maintaining a Police presence from a distance. The crowd actually dispersed at \naround 20:30 hours, following which, the Police Officers also left the spot. \nFollowing subsequent enquiries conducted on 26 and 27 January 2026, twelve persons \nwere arrested in connection with the incident. Out of these, eight were provisionally charged \nfor the offence of “Rebellion” and one for “Rogue and Vagabond”, whilst three persons were \nreleased after enquiry. Four persons were also contravened for playing loud music. \nI have requested the Commissioner of Police to complete the enquiry at the earliest.  \nAs regards part (d) of the question, I wish to inform the House that the Police is now \ndeploying a contingent of the Special Mobile Force together with the Divisional Support \nUnit, Emergency Response Service and Police du Tourisme as well as Police de \nl’Environnement every Sunday from 12:00 hours to 20:00 hours at the main public beaches. \nMadam Speaker, as I mentioned last week, we are also looking into the possibility of \nincreasing the fine. Even though it is rather high, we think it should be increased. And as I \nmentioned last week in my reply, I think PQ B/78, we will not tolerate that Police Officers are \nsworn at and distracted while performing their police duties.  \nPeople must respect the uniform of that Police Officer who is doing a public duty. The \nlaw will be strengthened and be made more severe. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. Yes! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, the first question, if you will allow, is firstly why was it \ndeemed appropriate to allow those persons, who, according to the hon. Prime Minister, \nhimself, were consuming alcohol, were violent, had been rebelling against Police Officers so \nmuch so that they were impuissants. \nMadam Speaker: Please put your question! \nMr A. Duval: The question being: why was it deemed appropriate to let these persons \nsimply go on that night? Why was the SMF and the SSU not mobilised there and then, when \nit was obvious that the ratio of Police Officers to violent individuals was very much off? \nThe Prime Minister: As I explained, Madam Speaker, the Police wanted to avoid a \ndirect confrontation with about 250 persons. By the time the SMF would come, they decided, \non the spot, that it is better not to have this confrontation now, but they will get these people \nthrough the various systems that they have. And they did. \nMadam Speaker: So, they are wise after the event? \nThe Prime Minister: Yes. \nMadam Speaker: Of course! \nMr A. Duval: May I ask? \nMadam Speaker: Yes. No statements! \nMr A. Duval: Yes. May I ask the hon. Prime Minister: is he aware that apparently – \nand maybe he can confirm –, there have been further incidents there at Palmar since this \nincident? Is he aware of same? \nThe Prime Minister: I am not aware of any further incident, Madam Speaker. \nMr A. Duval: The last question, Madam Speaker. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, I have been repeating it time and time again… \nMadam Speaker: No, no! Question! Question! \nMr A. Duval: …for specialised units. I am glad to hear that it will now be done. My \nplea, however, to the hon. Prime Minister is that 20:00 hours is too early. \nMadam Speaker: Put a question! \nMr A. Duval: Will the hon. Prime Minister consider, therefore, extending the time that \nthe SMF and other specialised unit will be on duty at main public beaches to over 20:00 \nhours? In fact, I would ask him to at least 12 p.m. \nMadam Speaker: 12 p.m.? Okay. 12 p.m. \nThe Prime Minister: I will pass on this suggestion to the Commissioner of Police. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, next question!  \nHon. Third Member for Grand Baie and Poudre d'Or! \nPORT LOUIS HARBOUR – NEW MASTER PLAN – IMPLEMENTATION STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/150",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 150,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/150) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nimplementation of the New Master Plan for the Port Louis Harbour, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Mauritius Ports Authority, information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I shall reply to \nParliamentary Questions B/150 and B/160 together as they relate to the same subject matter. \nThe Port Master Plan 2024, which focused on development needs up to 2050, was \napproved by the Board of the Mauritius Ports Authority on 18 March 2025.  \nBased on cargo forecasts and changes in the port environment, seven infrastructural \nprojects at the estimated cost of Rs56.3 billion have been recommended for implementation \nwith a view to increasing the container handling capacity, improving productivity, port \nefficiency and operation. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that the Mauritius Ports Authority has already initiated \naction for the implementation of three projects, namely – \n(a) \nthe expansion of the existing terminal to accommodate additional container \nstacking yard and introduction of a new gate system to increase operational \nefficiency and capacity of the terminal. The Mauritius Ports Authority is \nfinalising the bid documents for the procurement of consultancy services. The \nRequest for Proposals is expected to be floated in April of this year. Works of a \nduration of 18 months are expected to start by the end of 2027; \n(b) \nthe extension of the Cruise Jetty to accommodate larger cruise vessels. Again, \nan invitation for proposal for consultancy services through an Open \nInternational Bidding exercise was floated on 02 October 2025. Evaluation of \nthe offers is in progress. Construction works of a duration of 18 months are \nexpected to start by October 2027, and \n(c) \nprequalification document for the selection of contractors for the infrastructural \ndevelopment at Fort William over an extent of 55 hectares has been submitted to \nthe Central Procurement Board on 17 March 2026 for their vetting prior to \nlaunching the pre-qualification of contractors’ exercise. Works of a duration of \n15 months are expected to start by April 2027. \nIn addition, the reconstruction of Quays B and C, presently occupied by the National \nCoast Guard, is being looked into. \nTwo jetty projects would be financed by private promoters who would be operating at \nFort George and Fort William. The Mauritius Ports Authority has already earmarked land of a \ntotal extent of three hectares at Fort George for the development of petroleum storage \nfacilities. Procedures for the allocation of land are ongoing. As regards the proposed jetty at \nFort William, same will be developed by the promoters of petroleum storage facilities. \nMadam Speaker, following my State Visit to India in September of last year, both \nGovernments have agreed on a strategic partnership for the redevelopment and restructuring \nof the port in Mauritius. \nOn 19 December 2025, Government agreed to the setting up of an Inter-Ministerial \nCommittee on the Strategy for Port Development under the chair of the then Deputy Prime \nMinister. \nOn 06 March 2026, Government agreed, in-principle, to the recommendations of the \nInter-Ministerial Committee to, inter alia – \n(a) \nopening of capital of the Cargo Handling Corporation Ltd to Maersk Ltd and \nMediterranean Shipping Company Ltd as minority shareholders of up to a \nthreshold of 40%, subject to compliance with the Public Procurement Act and \nthe Competition Act, and \n(b) \nthe implementation of the Island Container Terminal project. \nMadam Speaker, the Island Container Terminal project comprises the construction of a \nbreakwater to create a rather tranquil basin, if I may put it that way, in front of the present \nMauritius Container Terminal, a navigation channel dredged up to 18 metres deep, a new \ncontainer terminal of an area of 50 hectares and a quay of 1.2 km in length. The cost of the \nproject, as per the Port Master Plan 2024, is estimated to be approximately Rs47.3 billion \nexcluding VAT and the construction period is projected to be between 6 to 8 years.  \nIn addition to standard container operations, the project is planned as a multi-functional \nand future-oriented port development. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Etwareea, are you okay? Hon. Lobine! \nMr Lobine: May I ask the hon. Prime Minister, how will the role of the MPA as a \nlandlord and regulator be preserved in the event of increased Private Sector participation in \nthe development of the Port? \nThe Prime Minister: The Private Sector will be less than 50%. \nMadam Speaker: Okay? One more? \nMr Lobine: Yes. And does the Port Master Plan incorporate green port initiative, as it \nis being done around the world, because as at now, our port is very near to a bird sanctuary as \nwell. So, will this Master Plan englobe this green port initiative? \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, it will. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, thank you. Now Mr Beechook! \nFOREIGN WORKERS – OVERSTAYING ISSUES – PREVENTIVE MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/151",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 151,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/151) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to foreign workers, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Passport and Immigration Office, \ninformation as to the – \n(a) \nnumber thereof having overstayed their respective residence and/or work permit, \nnationality-wise, and \n(b) \nmeasures being taken to prevent overstaying of such workers.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I shall reply to Parliamentary Questions \nB/151 and B/158 together, as they relate to the same subject matter. \n In regard to part (a) of the questions, I am informed that as at 27 March 2026, 64,165 \nforeign workers are employed in Mauritius, of whom 50,234 are holders of work permits \nunder the Non-Citizens (Employment Restriction) Act and 13,931 are holders of occupation \npermits under the Immigration Act. The main sectors in which they are employed include \nmanufacturing, construction, agriculture, tourism, and SMEs. \nI am also informed by the Passport and Immigration Office that as at 27 March 2026, \n6,926 foreign workers, are overstaying in Mauritius. The details are as follows – \n(i) \n2,819 have been reported as missing by their employers and their work permits \nhave been cancelled; \n(ii) \n2,698 have expired work permits and are awaiting renewal thereof, and \n(iii) 1,409 have expired work permits and no applications for renewal were submitted. \nI am tabling the nationalities of the overstaying foreign workers.  \nMadam Speaker, as at 27 March 2026, 6,656 foreign students hold valid residence \npermits. Foreign students are allowed to work for up to 20 hours per week without the need \nfor any work permit. The Ministry of Labour and Industrial Relations is considering to \nreview the existing policy to require concerned institutions to apply for work permits to allow \nforeign students to work for a maximum period of 20 hours. \n With regard to part (b) of the questions, the Tracing and Tracking Team of the \nPassport and Immigration Office in collaboration with other units and branches of the Police \nForce do regular crackdown operations throughout the island. For the year 2025, 97 such \noperations were carried out resulting in the arrest and repatriation of 944 foreigners. Since the \nbeginning of this year, 24 crackdown operations were carried out and 151 foreigners were \nrepatriated. \nMadam Speaker, to ensure compliance by employers within the current legislations, I \nam informed that the Ministry of Labour and Industrial Relations is not issuing new work \npermits unless and until the concerned employers have taken the necessary measures to \nrenew the expired work permits of foreign workers or to repatriate them. \nMadam Speaker, my Government is very concerned about the problem of foreign \nworkers overstaying in the country and is coming up with the following measures to address \nthe matter – \n(i) \na combined work and residence permit with the inclusion of a QR code, which \nwould allow labour inspectors or Police to verify the real-time status of the work \nand residence permits during surprise visits. \n(ii) \nA rules-based work permit system will be implemented which would also include \nan accreditation framework for employers to make them more responsible and \nliable for the foreign workers they recruit. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Beechook! Are you okay? \nHon. Rookny first! Oh, I am sorry, is it all right? \nMr Rookny: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Could the hon. Prime Minister please advise \nthe House what problems are the Police or PIO having in policing these overstaying workers? \nThe Prime Minister: It is a good question. The problem is: they seem to disappear in \nthin air. So, the Police are looking for them. I have also asked the Commissioner of Police, in \nfact, to strengthen the crack team that is doing the work in cooperation, including the SMF, if \nneed be. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Leader of the Opposition! \nMr Lesjongard: Madam Speaker, may I ask the hon. Prime Minister to confirm the \nfollowing: in reply to a PQ, the Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations stated that some \n3,000 cases of illegal employment have been regularised. Do we understand that they have \nmade something illegal legal? \nMadam Speaker: Employees. \nThe Prime Minister: No, no. Very often, what happens is that they have submitted \ntheir application for a permit – if I am not mistaken – and it’s been going through the system. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, we have finished with that issue. \nHon. Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière. \nAPPRENTICE JOCKEYS & JOCKEYS – GRANTING OF LICENCES – \nINSURANCE REQUIREMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/152",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 152,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/152) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External   communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \ngranting of licences to local and international apprentice jockeys and jockeys respectively, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Gambling Regulatory Authority, \ninformation as to the type of insurance required therefor, indicating – \n(a) \nthe monthly or yearly premium applicable category-wise, and \n(b) \nif there is an age limit for apprentice jockeys and, if so, give the reasons therefor.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Gambling Regulatory \nAuthority that as per Section 22.2 of the Rules of Racing 2024, any jockey and apprentice \njockey is mandatorily required to have an insurance cover. Although the Rules do not specify \nthe type of cover, insurance taken for jockeys and apprentice jockeys, both local and \ninternational, are usually of two types namely, personal accident and health catastrophe \ncover.   \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Gambling Regulatory \nAuthority that it is the responsibility of the horse racing organiser, currently the MTC Jockey \nClub Ltd, to arrange for the insurance cover, which is then billed to the jockey and apprentice \njockey.  \nI am informed that under the previous Government, People’s Turf PLC, did not provide \nfor insurance cover for the jockeys and apprentice jockeys for both 2023 and 2024, the period \nduring which it was, that is, the PLC was the horse racing organiser, and this was against the \nprinciples of the Gambling Revenue Authority and, to which the latter, I must say, turned a \ncompletely blind eye but they did not do anything about it. \nThe annual premium for the personal accident cover is as follows – \n• Rs 172,500 for a local jockey and an apprentice jockey, and \n• Rs 87,500 for a foreign jockey. \nThe annual premium for the health insurance is Rs14,244 for both a local jockey and the \napprentice jockey. \nConcerning part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Gambling Regulatory \nAuthority that as per Section 20 of the Rules of Racing 2024, a person can apply for an \napprentice jockey licence if that person is aged 16 years or more. This is, I believe, the \ninternational practice.  \nFurthermore, this age limit is in line with Section 10 of the Workers’ Rights Act which \nprovides that a person is considered to be of full age and capacity to enter into an \nemployment contract only if the person is aged 16 years or more. \nMr Quirin: Madame la présidente… \nMadam Speaker: Yes, yes. \nMr Quirin: Merci. L’honorable Premier ministre peut-il expliquer à la Chambre, \nsachant que les difficultés que rencontrent les jockeys et apprentis mauriciens pour gagner \nleur vie, pourquoi la prime d’assurance est beaucoup plus élevée que celle qui concerne les \njockeys étrangers, pratiquement le double si j’ai bien compris la réponse du Premier \nministre ? \nThe Prime Minister: This is precisely because, it is felt that they already have an \ninsurance from wherever they are coming. That is, a foreign jockey already has an assurance \nwhich covers them. So, this is why it is lower. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! \nMr Quirin: L’honorable Premier ministre trouve-t-il normale de demander aux jockeys \net apprentis mauriciens de débourser en une seule tranche R172 000 pour une prime \nd’assurance qui leur permet d’avoir leur licence alors qu’on aurait pu leur facilité la tâche en \nles faisant payer en mensualité, en plusieurs tranches. N’est-ce pas là enlever la chance au \nmauriciens de pouvoir exercer leur métier en toute quiétude ? L’honorable Premier ministre \nprendra-t-il toute cette question avec la GRA ? Pourquoi ne pas demander à la GRA, par \nexemple, de subventionner cette prime d’assurance en partie ? \nThe Prime Minister: I am not sure that the GRA can subsidise them but I could ask \nthem whether it is possible to pay it in tranches if that is what you are saying. I could ask \nthem. I do not know whether it is feasible or not because it is the insurance company at the \nend of the day which will decide. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, fair enough. Now we have the hon. First Member for Savanne \nand Black River! \nDRINK DRIVING – REPORTED CASES – PREVENTIVE MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/153",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 153,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/153) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to drink driving, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to \nthe number of reported cases thereof since 01 January 2026 to date, indicating the number \nthereof wherein the suspects are at their second and third offences, respectively and actions \nbeing contemplated to prevent such situations.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat for the period 01 January 2026 to 27 March 2026, a total of 650 cases of Driving under \nthe Influence of Alcohol were detected by the Police. Out of these 650 cases, I am informed \nthat 46 suspects are at their second offence, 5 are at their third offence and 2 at their fourth \noffence.  \nAs regards the actions being contemplated to prevent repeating such offences, I am \ninformed that the Police are intensifying targeted enforcement operations, including alcotest \nchecks, vehicle checkpoints and patrols at high-risk periods and locations, whilst also \npursuing public awareness and sensitisation campaigns to discourage drink driving and \npromote responsible behaviour. \nMadam Speaker, over and above these measures, Government has already announced \nthat stringent actions are being taken, and will continue to be taken, against all forms of road \ntraffic offences. In fact, the Road Traffic Act has recently been amended to reintroduce the \npenalty points system which provides for stricter sanctions, including automatic \ndisqualification upon accumulation of penalty points. These amendments also include longer \nperiods of licence suspension for repeated offenders, and tougher fines and penalties for \nserious traffic offences. \nAdditionally, the Ministry of Land Transport is currently working on a new piece of \nlegislation whereby vehicles of persons booked for driving under the influence of alcohol or \ndrugs will be immediately impounded. The Commissioner of Police will be empowered to \nmake ex-parte application to a Judge in Chambers for the immediate suspension of driving \nlicences in such cases. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, are you alright? Okay, now I have the Third Member for Port \nLouis North and Montagne Longue, Mr Caserne! \nREGISTRAR GENERAL’S DEPARTMENT – EXISTING VACANCIES – FILLING \nOF POSTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/154",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 154,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/154) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Registrar General’s Department, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to the existing vacancies thereat, grade-wise, indicating the expected date of \nfilling thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, there are currently 14 vacant positions at the \nRegistrar-General’s Department in different grades. This includes 6 vacancies in the grade of \nRegistration Officer and Senior Registration Officer.   \nThe post, Madam Speaker, was advertised by the Public Services Commission in \nOctober 2023, that is, just one year prior to the elections.  Following a selection exercise, by \nway of letter dated 01 October 2024 which was received by the Registrar-General’s \nDepartment on 04 October 2024, the PSC submitted the names of 8 candidates to be \nappointed. However, following the dissolution of National Assembly on 04 October 2024, the \nDepartment stayed action on this issue and the PSC re-advertised the posts on 30 July 2025 \nand as at date, recruitment process is still underway at the level of the PSC.   \n The remaining 8 vacancies are as follows – \n(a) \nOne Principal Financial Operations Officer;  \n(b) \nOne Financial Operations Officer/ Senior Financial Operations Officer;  \n(c) \nThree Assistant Financial Operations Officers;  \n(d) \nOne Assistant Procurement and Supply Officer;  \n(e) \nOne Management Support Officer, and \n(f) \nOne Confidential Secretary. \nThese grades fall under the aegis of the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Public \nService and Administrative Reforms. Action has already been initiated for the filling of these \nvacancies. \nMadam Speaker, there is still a backlog at the level of the PSC and this is why it is \ntaking so much time to fill vacancies in general in the public service. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, are you alright? Yes, Mr Beejan, last question! \nEXPORT ORIENTED (GOODS) ENTERPRISES – WAGE SUPPORT LOAN \nSCHEME – TERMS & CONDITIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/155",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 155,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/155) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Wage \nSupport Loan Scheme for Export Oriented (Goods) Enterprises implemented to support \nenterprises severely impacted by COVID-19, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Development Bank of Mauritius Ltd., (DBM), information as to the – \n(a) \nmeans of financing thereunder; \n(b) \nterms and conditions thereof, indicating the – \n(i) \nsecurity required, and  \n(ii) \nnumber of beneficiaries and amount of loans disbursed, in arrears, settled \nand written off, respectively and number thereof in liquidation/receivership, \nfurther indicating the impact thereof on DBM Ltd., and  \n(c) \nobligations of Government in respect of the unpaid dues.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, in June 2020, in the context of COVID-19 \npandemic, the previous Government agreed to implement, amongst others, a Wage Support \nLoan Scheme for Export Oriented (Goods) Enterprises, to be administered through the \nDevelopment Bank of Mauritius Ltd. Out of a total of Rs8 billion which was made available \nby the Bank of Mauritius to the DBM, Rs5.9 billion has been utilised to service loan requests \nfrom its clients under the various COVID-19 Schemes.   \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that the Bank of Mauritius \nprovided a Special Line of Credit of Rs2 billion to the Development Bank of Mauritius to \nfacilitate the implementation of the scheme. This line of credit carried an interest rate of 1.3% \nper annum and was repayable over a period of five years, including a six-month moratorium \nperiod. Of the Rs2 billion line of credit, Rs1.5 billion were subsequently on-lent to EOEs.  \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the DBM that the terms and \nconditions of the Scheme were as follows – \n(i) \nthe loan amount was determined based on the wage bill of the enterprise; \n(ii) \nthe interest rate of 2% per annum, and \n(iii) the repayment of up to 5 years including a moratorium of six months on capital. \n With regard to part (b)(i) of the question on security requirements, I am informed by \nthe Development Bank of Mauritius that, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and \ngiven that the enterprises were in distress, the Board of the DBM approved the scheme \nwhereby no collateral was requested as security from the beneficiaries of the loans contrary to \nthe usual credit policy guidelines of the Development Bank of Mauritius or of any other bank.   \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b)(ii) of the question, an amount of Rs1.5 billion \nwas disbursed under the scheme to 43 enterprises. To date, Rs580 million have been repaid, \ncomprising both capital and interest. Currently, 36 enterprises are in arrears for an amount of \nRs335 million, that is, Rs299 million in capital and Rs36 million in interest. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that the Development Bank of Mauritius has not \nwritten off any liabilities for beneficiaries under the scheme. However, as at 30 June 2025, \nsome Rs400 million of the total portfolio are classified as non-performing, of which Rs304 \nmillion relate to five companies that are either in liquidation or under receivership.   The five \ncompanies are Star Knitwear Group Ltd, Jack Tellor International Limited, Beachwear \nExports Co. Ltd, Les Ateliers Creatifs de L’Océan and Riverwalk Investment Ltd. As the \nHouse is aware, incidentally, Star Knitwear Group Ltd still owes the MIC a sum of Rs425 \nmillion. \nWith regard to the impact on the DBM, such provisioning for non-performing loans has \nseriously affected the accounts of the Development Bank of Mauritius, which show a \nsubstantial loss of Rs388 million for the financial year 2024-2025, compared to the positive \nperformance recorded over the past three financial years. Furthermore, the non-payment of \nthe dues by the beneficiaries of the scheme will further impact on the DBM’s capacity to \nmeet its repayment obligations to the Bank of Mauritius. \n Today, the Development Bank of Mauritius has been squeezed out of all essential \nfunding preventing it to deliver on its core mandate because cronies of the previous \nGovernment have looted the bank.  This is yet another case of broad daylight robbery of \npublic funds under the previous Government, which has now endangered the financial \nstanding of the Development Bank of Mauritius.  Madam Speaker, I have given instructions \nfor an enquiry to be carried out on the whole matter to find out all those responsible for this \nbig financial scandal.  \nAs regards part (c) of the question, I wish to inform the House that in June 2020, the \nMinistry of Finance issued a letter of comfort to the Bank of Mauritius to the effect that \nGovernment will make its best endeavours to ensure that the DBM meets its obligations in \nrespect to the line of credit.  It also provides an underlying fiduciary guarantee that \nGovernment would be liable for all liabilities in case of default. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, Mr Beejan? \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. In light of the alleged abuse of the Scheme \nby the former Government, will the hon. Prime Minister inform the House whether any action \nwill be taken to chase those companies which have taken millions of rupees from the DBM \nand have winded-up after benefiting from the said scheme? \nThe Prime Minister: It is the intention of Government to do exactly that. In fact, for \nexample, we know that one company has taken all its money and has relocated in South \nAfrica. We are looking into all this. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Time is up now! Thank you very much everyone. \nHon. Members, the Table has been advised that PQ B/175 will be replied by the hon. \nMinister of Local Government and PQ B/176 will be replied by the hon. Minister of National \nInfrastructure. \nNow, we have also been advised that the following PQs have been withdrawn: B/156, \nB/159, B/161, B/162, B/163, B/165, B/166, B/167, B/168, B/169, B/170, B/171, and B/172. \nThank you. \nHon. Second Member for Grand' Baie, again! \nLODGING ACCOMMODATION PERMIT – APPLICATIONS (PAST SIX MONTHS) \n& INSPECTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/156",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 156,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/156) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the motor vehicles seized by the Financial Crimes Commission since November \n2024 to date, which are owned, controlled or acquired by or on behalf of persons involved in \nillicit transactions and of retail value exceeding Rs3 million, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain and provide the list thereof, indicating – \n(a) \nthe make, model and value thereof, and \n(b) \nwhether fines were imposed and/or prosecutions initiated.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nEMMANUEL ANQUETIL BUILDING – SPACE AVAILABILITY – \nREFURBISHMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/157",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 157,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/157) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Emmanuel Anquetil Building, he will state the extent of the spaces available \nthereat, indicating whether consideration will be given for the refurbishment thereof and, if \nso, giving details thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed that the Emmanuel Anquetil Building built in 1979, requires \nsignificant refurbishment. In 2024, former occupants, namely the Ministry of Health and \nWellness and the Solid Waste Management Division of the Ministry of Environment, Climate \nChange and Solid Waste Management had relocated to other places, thus vacating office \nspaces on Levels 5, 7 and 10. Opportunities were, therefore, taken to carry out refurbishment \nworks, including the removal and disposal of asbestos partitionings. The works were \ncompleted in December 2025.  \nAfter completion of the works, these spaces have already been reallocated as follows – \n(i) \nLevel 5 to the Ministry of Health and Wellness; \n(ii) \nLevel 7 to the Cabinet Office and Civil Status Division, and \n(iii) Level 10 to the Police Department. \n \nFOREIGNERS – RESIDENCE/WORK PERMITS – STATISTICS & COMPLIANCE \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/158",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 158,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/158) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nforeigners, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Passport and Immigration \nOffice, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber thereof – \n(i) \ncurrently employed, indicating the number thereof having overstayed their \nresidence and/or work permits;  \n(ii) \nbeing students holding a work permit and not holding a work permit, \nrespectively, and  \n(iii) sectors in which they are engaged, and  \n(b) \nmeasures being taken to enforce compliance with the existing legislation.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/151) \n \n \nDIRECTOR OF AUDIT REPORT – FY 2024-2025 – CONTENT ASSESSMENT & \nCORRECTIVE MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/159",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 159,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/159) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Director of Audit Report for financial year 2024-2025, he will state whether an \nassessment of the content thereof has been carried out and, if so, indicate – \n(a) \nthe corrective measures being envisaged in relation thereto, and \n(b) \n how the introduction of Performance-Based Budgeting is expected to help \nredress the situation.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPORT LOUIS HARBOUR – NEW MASTER PLAN – INVESTMENT PHASES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/160",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 160,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/160) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nimplementation of the New Master Plan for the Port Louis Harbour, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Mauritius Ports Authority, information as to where matters stand, \nindicating – \n(a)  the proposed initial phase-wise investment envisaged thereunder, including the \ntimelines, sources of financing and priority projects, and  \n(b)  whether consideration is being given for the participation of international partners \nin the development, operation or management of the Port Louis Harbour and, if \nso, give details thereof, including the proposed partnership model.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/150) \nBASIC RETIREMENT PENSION – AGE ELIGIBILITY INCREASE – SOCIO-\nECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/161",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 161,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floréal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/161) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the increase in the \neligibility age to benefit from the Basic Retirement Pension, he will state whether, in the \ncontext of the preparation of the forthcoming Budget, his Ministry has carried out any study \nor socio-economic impact assessment of the effects thereof on vulnerable groups, including \nlow-income earners and, if so, indicate the main findings and conclusions thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nEDB – MR S. M., DEPUTY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER – APPOINTMENT \nTERMS & CONDITIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/162",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 162,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/162) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mr. S. M., Deputy \nChief Executive Officer of the Economic Development Board, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to his date and terms and conditions of appointment, indicating \nthe circumstances under which his contract was renewed and the terms and conditions of his \nnew contract.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nWOMEN MURDERS & SUSPICIOUS DEATHS – 01 JANUARY 2026-MARCH 2026 \n– INQUIRIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/163",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 163,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/163) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to women, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the \nnumber thereof having been reportedly murdered or found dead in suspicious circumstances \nsince 01 January 2026 to date, indicating – \n(a) \nwhere matters stand as to the inquiries initiated thereinto, and  \n(b) \nwhether – \n(i) \nan online assistance service for crime prevention is available thereto, and  \n(ii) \nconsideration will be given for a counselling facility to be put at the \ndisposal of women at risk.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIUS POLICE FORCE – MORTUARY VANS – ACQUISITION & \nDEPLOYMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/164",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 164,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/164) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nmortuary vans, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, \ninformation as to the number thereof at the disposal of the Mauritius Police Force, indicating \nwhether consideration will be given for the acquisition and deployment of at least one such \nvan in each Police division.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that since March 2020, the \nservices of Police mortuary vans have been decentralised to ensure a faster response for the \ntransfer of dead bodies to mortuaries. \n \nPresently, the Mauritius Police Force operates a fleet of seven mortuary vans. Out of \nthese, one van is based at Transport Guardroom at Line Barracks to cover the Metropolitan \nNorth Division and Metropolitan South Division, while one van is stationed at each of the \nfollowing Divisional Support Units – \n(i) \nNorthern Division at Piton; \n(ii) \nSouthern Division at Rose Belle; \n(iii) \nEastern Division at Flacq; \n(iv) \nCentral Division at Curepipe; \n(v) \nWestern Division at Rose Hill, and \n(vi) \nRodrigues Division at Port Mathurin. \n \nThe present arrangement for the deployment of mortuary vans at each Division meets \nthe operational requirements of the Mauritius Police Force. \n \nHowever, with a view to reinforcing the present capacity of the fleet in case of \nbreakdown or repairs of a mortuary van, the Police Department is planning to acquire two \nnew mortuary vans. \nMAURITIUS – VARIETIES OF DEMOCRACY INSTITUTE 2026 REPORT – \nRECLASSIFICATION – COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/165",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 165,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/165) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mauritius being \nreclassified as a democracy in the Report of the Varieties of Democracy Institute 2026, he \nwill state whether a detailed comparative analysis of the factors and indicators which, \naccording to the reports thereof of the past five years highlighting the evolution of Mauritius, \nhas been carried out and, if so, indicate whether same will be laid on the Table of the \nAssembly.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nRODRIGUES – PLAINE CORAIL AIRPORT – NEW RUNWAY CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/166",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 166,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/166) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the project for the \nconstruction of a new runway at Plaine Corail Airport, in Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from Airports of Mauritius Co. Ltd., information as to where matters \nstand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nMONEY LAUNDERING – DRUG TRAFFICKING PROCEEDS – ARRESTS & \nSEIZED VEHICLES \n\n133",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/167",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 167,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/167) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the laundering of money suspected of being proceeds of drug trafficking, since \nNovember 2024 to date, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Financial \nCrimes Commission and the Commissioner of Police, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of suspected drug dealers arrested in relation thereto, and  \n(b) \nlist of vehicles including cars, motorbikes and quads and pleasure craft seized in \nconnection therein, indicating the total estimated value thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \nPOLICE QUARTERS – RETIREMENT ON MEDICAL GROUNDS – \nACCOMMODATION POLICY REVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/168",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 168,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/168) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Police Officers, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner \nof Police, information as to the number thereof having had to vacate their lodging in police \nquarters on retiring due to sudden or serious illness, indicating – \n(a) \nthe delay granted thereto and their families to find alternative accommodation, \nand  \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given for a review of the current practice in such \ncircumstances.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSDDS+ STATUS – MAURITIUS UPGRADING – MEASURES ADOPTED & \nBENEFITS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/169",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 169,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/169) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nupgrading of Mauritius to the Special Data Dissemination Standard Plus (SDDS+) status by \nthe International Monetary Fund, he will state the – \n(a) \nmeasures taken by Government that led thereto, and  \n(b) \nkey benefits associated therewith, particularly, in terms of access to financing, \ninvestment prospects and economic resilience.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nHON. PAUL RAYMOND BÉRENGER RESIGNATION – SUBSEQUENT \nRESIGNATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/170",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 170,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/170) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the recent resignation of Honourable Paul Raymond Bérenger, GCSK as Deputy \nPrime Minister, he will state the other resignations that have followed in the wake thereof in \nrelation to our missions abroad, parastatal bodies, advisory positions, State-owned enterprises \nand State institutions.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nHON. PAUL RAYMOND BÉRENGER RESIGNATION – PRIOR MEETING – \nRESIGNATION REASONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/171",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 171,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/171) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the recent resignation of Honourable Paul Raymond Bérenger, GCSK as Deputy \nPrime Minister, he will state whether he met the Honourable Member in the days prior to the \nsaid resignation and, if so, indicate the reasons put forward by the latter.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFIFA WORLD CUP 2026 – MBC MATCHES BROADCASTING – \nARRANGEMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/172",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 172,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/172) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nforthcoming FIFA World Cup 2026, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nMauritius Broadcasting Corporation, information as to the arrangements being made, if any, \nfor the broadcast of the matches thereof on the channels of the Corporation.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRDA – ROAD DECONGESTION – STUDY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/173",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 173,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/173) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to the Lodging \nAccommodation Permit (LAP) required in connection with the application for a Work \nPermit, he will give the list of potential employers having submitted applications therefor \nover the past six months, indicating the – \n(a) \ndate of submission thereof and the date of the accommodation inspection and \naverage time taken between the submission of a LAP application and the conduct \nof the said inspection, and  \n(b) \nnumber of accommodation inspections carried out.",
      "answer": "Mr Uteem: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that lodging accommodation \nfor migrant workers and other guest employees are governed by the Occupational Safety and \nHealth Act 2005 and the Occupational Safety and Health (Employees’ Lodging \nAccommodation) Regulation of 2011. \nRegulation 6 of the regulation provides that no employer shall use a building as a \nlodging accommodation unless he holds a Lodging Accommodation Permit (LAP), in respect \nof that lodging accommodation. Enforcement of the regulation is ensured by the Employees’ \nLodging Accommodation Section of the National Occupational Safety and Health \nDepartment of my Ministry. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the hon. \nMember that as per advice tendered by the Attorney General’s Office and in view of the \nprovisions of the Data Protection Act, it would not be proper to circulate the names of the \npotential employers who applied for the LAP.  \nOver the past six months, that is, from October 2025 till March 2026, 318 applications \nwere received at my Ministry, in respect of which, 220 permits have, as at date, been issued. \nIn addition, 14 applications have been approved, but the applicants have not yet been effected \npayment of the appropriate fees for the issue of the LAP.  \nPending cases are as follows – \n• \nfor 18 applications, payment of permit fees has been effected, and same are being \nprocessed for issue of permit; \n• \nfor 5 applications, letters of compliance are being awaited from the employers, \nand  \n• \nfor 2 applications, amended clearances are being awaited from the Mauritius Fire \nand Rescue Service and the Ministry of Health and Wellness. \nAs regards the remaining 59 applications, these will be determined at the meeting of the \nLodging Accommodation Committee, established under the Regulation, scheduled for today \nitself. \nMadam Speaker, the average time taken between submission of the LAP application \nand the conduct of the first inspection by my Ministry is 21 days.  \nConcerning part (b) of the question, I am informed that the ELA Section of my \nMinistry has conducted 413 inspections in respect of 318 applications submitted by potential \nemployers over the past six months.  \nAccordingly, I am tabling the number of potential employers who have submitted \napplication for LAP over the past six months, together with the respective dates of the \napplications, and dates of visits carried out for the various lodging accommodations. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Beejan!  \nMr Uteem: No!  \nMadam Speaker: You have not finished? \nMr Uteem: I have not finished. I am just tabling this. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to highlight that as at date, out of 84 established posts in the \nNOSH Department of my Ministry, only 56 officers are physically in post. With regard to the \nsection dealing with LAP application, out of 14 funded posts, there are five vacancies, that is, \none third. So, we have a big staffing problem at the Ministry.  \nOn average, my Ministry receives more than 50 new applications for LAP every month \nand the number is increasing. Despite all efforts, it has not been possible to reduce the time \ntaken to process LAP applications in view of the increasing number of applications and the \nacute shortage of staff at the NOSH Department. \nMadam Speaker, while there is an increase in the demand for migrant workers from \nemployers, my Ministry has also received several complaints from citizens regarding the \noperation of lodging accommodation in residential areas. With a view to reducing \nmushrooming of lodging accommodations throughout the island and mitigating these \nchallenges, my Ministry is coming up with a centralised lodging accommodation regulation \nwhich will be promulgated shortly. It is at the level of the Attorney General’s Office. These \nregulations will allow several employers to house their workers in a centralised dormitory, of \nwhich, the owner will be the licence holder. This is going to greatly reduce the application for \nLAP going forward. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Beejan! \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Given the financial strain on small businesses \nfrom waiting for an inspection of lodging accommodation or issue of work permit, will the \nhon. Minister consider to recruit more officers and posting be done in those two specific \ndepartments in order to relief SMEs or other businesses? Thank you. \nMr Uteem: I totally agree with the hon. Member. We are making the request, and I \nhope there will be a positive response from the Ministry of Finance in the coming budget. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. That’s it? \nThe hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nMASA – CISAC MEMBERSHIP & REQUIREMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/174",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 174,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/174) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the Mauritius Society of Authors \n(MASA), he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to whether it is \nmaintaining and strengthening its membership with the International \nConfederation of Societies of Authors and Composers, and  \n(b) \nstate the measures his Ministry proposes to take to assist MASA to fully meet the \ninternational requirements necessary to preserve the said membership.",
      "answer": "Mr Gondeea: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed \nby the Mauritius Society of Authors (MASA) that it has been able to maintain its provisional \nmembership with the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers \n(CISAC), and it has already embarked on the implementation of a series of measures in line \nwith the requirements of CISAC to strengthen its membership.  \nI am also informed that at its General Assembly held on 28 May 2025, CISAC had \napproved the extension of MASA’s provisional membership for a further period of two years, \nsubject to compliance with strict conditions as CISAC had already informed that no further \nextension will be granted. \nMadam Speaker, it is important to underline that the situation we inherited was a matter \nof serious concern. For years, there had been clear warning signals regarding the governance, \ncompliance and overall functioning of MASA. This prolonged inaction placed MASA’s \ninternational standing at risk and created uncertainty for Mauritian artists. \nMadam Speaker, faced with this situation, my Ministry has acted promptly and \nresponsibly. In this context, I am informed that the Regional Direction for Africa of CISAC \neffected a mission to Mauritius from 23 to 27 February 2026 to guide MASA on the measures \nrequired to ensure compliance and safeguard membership.  \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that MASA has already initiated concrete steps \nto meet CISAC requirements, including – \n(i) \nuploading of the audited financial statements for years 2020-2021 and 2021-\n2022 on the CISAC Governance Portal on 31 October 2025; \n(ii) \nsubmitting the financial statements for the years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 to \nthe National Audit Office for auditing, with unaudited versions already \nuploaded on the portal; \n(iii) \nupdating its repertoire CIS-NET on 02 November 2025, with the next update \nscheduled for May 2026, and \n(iv) \ndistributing approximately Rs18.7 million to local copyright owners in \nDecember 2025 and Rs1.7 million to Foreign Right Holders in February 2026.  \nThese actions demonstrate that MASA is actively aligning with international standards.  \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (b) of the question, Government has provided for a \nsum of Rs4 million over two years for the restructuring of MASA to assist the society in fully \nmeeting the international requirements necessary to preserve its membership with CISAC. \nHowever, given that MASA currently owns approximately Rs95 million in accumulated \nfunds with insufficient clarity and on their collection and reasons for non-distribution over a \nprolonged period, the Board of MASA has approved that a comprehensive forensic audit be \nundertaken as priority. \nMadam Speaker, the terms of reference for this audit which are being finalised by my \nMinistry will be launched shortly. This exercise is essential to restore confidence among \nartists and stakeholders to ensure that MASA is placed on a sound footing prior to \nrestructuring. Based on the findings of the forensic audit, my Ministry will thereafter proceed \nwith the consultancy services for a comprehensive restructuring plan.  \nIn parallel, my Ministry is supporting MASA in its modernisation efforts, including the \nacquisition of a cloud system to match the requirement of WIPO Connect. This will enhance \nrepertoire management, improve royalty tracking and distribution to artists. \nMadam Speaker, I therefore wish to reassure that my Ministry remains fully committed \nto supporting MASA in meeting all international requirements with a view to preserving and \nconsolidating its membership with CISAC and ensuring that Mauritian authors and right \nowners receive the royalties to which they are entitled. \nMadam Speaker, our artists deserve nothing less and as Minister of Arts and Culture, I \nwill stand firmly by them. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister! Yes! \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. Le ministre peut-il préciser à la Chambre \ns’il y a un délai qui a été fixé par l’instance internationale pour la régularisation de la \nsituation et s’il existe un risque de suspension ou de retrait de cette adhésion ? \nMr Gondeea: Je viens de préciser qu’on a déjà commencé le travail à la satisfaction de \nl’organisation. \nMadam Speaker: Donc, il n’y a pas de délai pour l’instant. \nMr Quirin: Donc, peut-on savoir si son ministère considère effectivement que ce \nmembership, cette adhésion constitue un pilier essentiel pour le développement du secteur \ncréatif mauricien et ainsi améliorant les revenus des artistes ? \nMr Gondeea: Yes, of course, we will do it. \nMadam Speaker: Très bien!  \nGood ! So, now I finish with Mr Quirin. Next page, sorry. So, now we have hon. \nApollon! \nLANDS (BARE & NEGLECTED) – VECTOR-BORNE DISEASES – \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/175",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 175,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/175) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, \nin regard to bare and neglected lands, he will state the measures his Ministry is taking or \nenvisaging to prevent same from being prolific breeding grounds for mosquitoes and the \nsubsequent spread of diseases, including Chikungunya.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Local Government (Mr R. Woochit): Madam Speaker, with your \npermission, I shall reply to PQ B/175. \nIn respond of the rising incidence of vector-borne diseases, including Chikungunya, my \nMinistry is actively participating in a coordinated and multisectoral strategy through an inter-\nministerial committee chaired by the Minister of Health and Wellness and comprising all \nlocal authorities, the Ministry of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nand the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change. This \ncollaborative platform ensures a unified and structured national response with all relevant \nstakeholders working in close coordination to implement preventive and corrective measures.  \nLocal authorities have intensified their cooperation to identify, clean and maintain bare \nand neglected lands across the island. As at date, 1,220 plots of bare lands have been cleaned \nand the detailed list is being tabled. \nMadam Speaker, under section 61(9) of the Local Government Act 2011, the Local \nAuthorities are empowered to intervene directly where such land poses a threat to public \nhealth, particularly in cases of unknown ownership or non-compliance. This provision is \nbeing actively enforced. Local authorities have also served enforcement notices on owners of \nbare lands, requiring remedial actions and as at date 1,368 enforcement notices have been \nissued, out of which 790 have already been complied with. Appropriate actions including \nlegal proceedings are being initiated in cases of non-compliance. \nTo further strengthen these measures, a meeting was held on 20 February and a circular \nwas also issued on 10 March 2026 to all local authorities to intensify enforcement against \nbare land and illegal dumping. In parallel, Health Inspectors have increased the frequency of \ninspections and enforcement actions within their respective jurisdiction to ensure close \nmonitoring and timely intervention. \nMadam Speaker, the Mauri-Facilities Management Co. Ltd and the Living Environment \nUnit of the Ministry of Environment have deployed dedicated teams to carry out targeted and \nlarge-scale cleaning operations in priority areas, including Camp Levieux, Roches Brunes \nand other affected regions. Similar exercises are on-going across Municipal and District \nCouncils covering road reserve, green space and other public areas. These interventions are \nbeing implemented within existing budgetary provision including allocation under the \nClimate Sustainability Fund whereby ensuring efficient and responsible use of public funds. \nEnforcement under the Environment Act 2024 is also being strictly applied. Eyesore \nAbatement Notices and Fixed Penalty Notices are being issued by local authorities and Police \nde L’environnement. \nFrom January 2025 to February 2026, 491 notices were issued by local authorities and \n143 by the police with fixed penalty imposed in cases of non-compliance. Public awareness \ncampaigns are also being conducted to promote proper sanitation practices at both household \nand community levels. An amount of approximately Rs2.5 million has been earmarked for \nthis purpose. \nMadam Speaker, whilst significant progress has already been achieved, I wish to \nunderline that there remain additional areas requiring interventions. In this regard, \nrecruitment of additional personnel started last week and is currently on-going. Upon \ncompletion, these additional resources will allow for the deployment of more dedicated teams \nto further strengthen the cleaning and maintenance of bare land and to enhance our national \nresponse in combatting Chikungunya and other vector-borne diseases. \nOn Thursday next, that is, on 02 April, we will have another inter-ministerial committee \nwhich will be held at the Office of the Ministry of Health and Wellness. With your \npermission, Madam Speaker, I am tabling a detailed information including the details, the \nextent of lands cleaned and enforcement action undertaken. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister! Yes, very good! \nNow, B/176 has been withdrawn. The Table has been advised, while I am at it, I am \nalso telling you about B/184, B/203, B/213, B/218, that have been withdrawn. So, Ministers, \nplease take note. \nNow, so we go to Mr Lobine, then! \nLA VIGIE-LA BRASSERIE-BEAUX SONGES LINK ROAD – CYCLE LANES – \nASSESSMENT/MONITORING FRAMEWORK",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/176",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 176,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floréal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/176) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the Minister \nof Land Transport whether, in regard to the cycle lanes incorporated into thirteen road \nprojects across 31.4 kilometres at the cost of Rs 546 million, including the 9.2 kilometres \nstretch along Phase 2 of the La Vigie–La Brasserie–Beaux Songes Link Road valued at Rs \n199.1 million, he will state whether any post-implementation assessment or monitoring \nframework was established, prior to or following the commissioning thereof, to evaluate the – \n(a)  usage frequency;  \n(b)  impact on accident reduction, and  \n(c)  user satisfaction thereof and, if so, give details thereof, including the \nmethodology adopted, frequency of assessments carried out and findings thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nELECTRONIC MONITORING BRACELETS – TIME FRAME \n\n39",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/177",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 177,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/177) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nAttorney-General whether, in regard to the use of electronic monitoring bracelets, he will \nstate where matters stand as to the – \n(a)  implementation thereof, indicating the reasons – \n (i)  why the relevant provisions for electronic monitoring have not yet been \nproclaimed or put into operation as at to date, and  \n(ii)  for the absence of regulations defining the operational protocols and \nmonitoring procedures, and  \n(b)  proposed time frame for the full implementation thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Glover: Madam Speaker, the Bail Act was amended in 2011 to provide in section \n8(4) thereof, for the imposition of electronic monitoring for a limited category of defendants \nor detainees to be released on bail, namely for those who are not ordinarily residents in \nMauritius or for those who are residents but liable on conviction for the offence with which \nthey have been charged to penal servitude or imprisonment for a term exceeding two years \nand who are also persons, whom a police officer not below the rank of Superintendent has \nreasonable grounds to believe or likely to leave Mauritius.  \nSection 8 (4) was not and has still not been proclaimed. My office has contacted the \noffice of the Commissioner of Police which is responsible for the implementation and \noperation of the proposed electronic monitoring of defendants and detainees. And, the \nCommissioner of Police has informed my office that a technical committee was set up, at the \ntime, under the Chairmanship of the then Deputy Commissioner of Police administration, to \nexamine the implementation and use of the electronic bracelets for persons to be released on \nbail. \nHowever, that committee decided that it would not be prudent to proceed with the \nproject due to its high-cost implications. The project was thus put on hold indefinitely.  \nAs at today, it is not possible to give a timeframe for the implementation of the project, \nwhich though commendable, is one which is very costly. We have to look at the priorities of \nthe day and at the moment, it is not possible to give a precise timetable for its \nimplementation. However, this issue will be looked into anew at the time we finalise the \nPolice and Criminal Justice Bill later this year.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay, that’s it. Good.  \nNow, we have Mr Beejan, again.  \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 6 – ACCIDENT-PRONE AREAS – SPEED BREAKERS \n& TRAFFIC LIGHTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/178",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 178,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/178) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the installation of high-raised speed \nbreakers and traffic lights, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the \nconsideration given therefor in localities of Constituency No. 6, particularly, in the vicinity of \nschools, religious places, area health centres and accident-prone areas over the past two years, \nindicating the timelines for the installation of any outstanding or proposed ones.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that raised tables \nare traffic calming measures installed on public roads and are placed at locations where a \nreduction in vehicles’ speed is deemed necessary due to safety consideration. Such locations \nmay include straight road alignments, residential zones and areas with high pedestrian \nactivity. \nI am informed by the TMRSU that over the last two years, the following traffic calming \nmeasures have been carried out in Constituency No.6 – \n(i) \nConstruction of a raised table along Saint François Road at Petit Raffray; \n(ii) \nImplementation of a raised pedestrian crossing at LUX Hotel, Grand Baie;  \n(iii) Conversion of an existing at-grade pedestrian crossing into a raised pedestrian \ncrossing along Vale Road at Upper Vale, near the Mandir. \nFurthermore, the following road safety measures have been implemented – \n• \nInstallation of a fixed Speed Camera at Fond du Sac along Plaines des Papayes \nRoad (B11) in November 2024, and also \n• \nImplementation of Speed Zone of 40 km/h along Grand Gaube Coastal Road at \nRoche Terre near Roche Terre Government School July 2025. \nMadam Speaker, I am made to understand that the TMRSU is pursuing discussions \nwith the District Council of Rivière du Rempart regarding the implementation of both single \nand double yellow line markings at some 10 locations identified in October 2025 to prevent \non-street parking of vehicles and enhance road safety in the region. The hon. Member will \nsurely recall that we had effected at site-visit together with his two colistiers. \nI have to highlight, Madam Speaker, that several projects identified across the island, I \nam going to the national level now, including in Constituency No. 6, could not be \nimplemented so far in view that the bidding exercise for the Framework Agreement by the \nCentral Procurement Board took an excessively long time to materialise.   \nI am informed that the bidding documents were finalised only in May 2025 and bids \nwere floated on 03 June 2025 by the CPB.  The recommendations of the latter were received \nonly in January 2026 and challenge was subsequently lodged by one bidder. Fortunately, in \nview that the matter was not referred to the Independent Review Panel, the contract was \nawarded by my Ministry on 05 March 2026 and I am given to understand that the submission \nof the insurance cover is currently awaited from one of the selected bidders to enable \nsignature of contract, and issuance of works orders by the TMRSU. All pending works will, \ntherefore, be implemented as a matter of urgency. I am sure that many of my colleagues \nacross the island will be happy to learn about this development at long last, which were \nbeyond our control.   \nI am further informed that, in the continuous effort to improve road safety along public \nroads, the construction of traffic calming measures (raised tables) at the following locations, \nwhich is part of the question, in Constituency No. 6, are in the pipeline – \n1. \nCap Malheureux, along B45 Road, near Kalimaye/Kovil Cap Malheureux ; \n2. \nCap Malheureux, along B45 Road, near Arya Samaj Mandir; \n3. \nRoche Terre, along B14 Road, near TVS Supermarket; \n4. \nGrand Gaube, along B14 Road, near Veranda Paul & Virginie Hotel & Spa; \n5. \nPereybère, along Old Mill Road, near Oasis Villas 1, and  \n6. \nResidential Morcellement at Beau Manguier, Pereybère. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to traffic lights, I am informed that the T-junction of Mont \nChoisy–Cap Malheureux Road (B13) near BLOOM, will be signalised in the course of time \nduring this year. \nIn view of concerns raised by the hon. Member, I have instructed the TMRSU to carry \nout surveys in the vicinity of schools, religious places, area health centres and of course, all \naccident-prone areas within Constituency No. 6 to identify the need for traffic calming \nmeasures for early implementation.   \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Beejan.  \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Minister, inform the House \nwhat budget allocations have been made for traffic calming measure in Constituency No.6 \nGrand Baie and Poudre d'Or in the current and previous financial year and how much have \nbeen utilised till date? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am given to understand by the TRMSU that \nthe final figure is being worked out but rest assured that they will be implemented. Like I \nsaid, all we needed was a good contractor but now, following the process of the CPB, we \nhave contractors and they will be implemented in due course.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Yes, Mr Beechook. \nMr Beechook: Madam Speaker, can the hon. Minister please request the TRMSU to \nconsider the following suggestion that usually they apply a blanket rule of not allowing high \nraised speed breakers which is one single strip that is, from the right-hand side to the left-\nhand side of the road, rightly so, unless there are drains on each side. Can they consider the \npossibility of having those bumps, which are divided into two, with a passage in-between, \nthat is, one right-hand side one the left-hand side to enable the flow of water so that we don’t \nface the situation that they usually refuse to have speed breakers on roads because there are \nno drains on each side? \nMr Osman Mahomed: A very high technical matter indeed. I will ask the technicians \nto look into, certainly.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Chief Whip, last question; before lunch, I mean.  \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 18 – WATER LEAKAGES – DETECTION \nEQUIPMENT – COVERED AREAS & TIMELINE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/179",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 179,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/179) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to water leakages in  \nConstituency No. 18, Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to whether leak detection equipment \nis being deployed thereat and, if so, give details thereof, the areas covered and the timeline \nfor the carrying out of a comprehensive leak detection exercise.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden : Madame la présidente, la CWA m'informe que les régions de Quatre \nBornes, Palma, Bassin, Belle Rose, Sodnac et Cité Kennedy, qui font partie de la zone \nd'approvisionnement en eau inférieure à Mare aux Vacoas. \nCes régions disposent d'un réseau vieillissant d'environ 60 km. Donc ces tuyaux sont \nsujets à des fuites. Les fuites visibles sont réparées par la CWA dans le cadre de ses \nopérations courantes. En cas de dysfonctionnement du réseau laissant suspecter des fuites \ninvisibles, du matériel de détection est déployé sur place pour localiser les fuites, puis les \nréparations sont effectuées. \nMadame la présidente, la CWA a également indiqué que les équipements utilisés pour \nla détection des fuites sont principalement des détecteurs et enregistreurs de fuites \nacoustiques. Un budget est prévu chaque année pour l'acquisition de ces équipements. Il \nconvient de souligner, Madame la présidente, que des fois des déviations de la circulation \nsont généralement nécessaires, ce qui influe sur le temps dont dispose la CWA pour effectuer \nles réparations. \nAfin d'améliorer l'efficacité du réseau de distribution d'eau dans ces régions, j'ai \négalement appris que d'importants travaux de remplacement des tuyaux, entre le rond-point \nde Saint-Jean et Rose Hill, ont été prévus dans le cadre du programme de remplacement des \ntuyaux financé par la Ligne de crédit indienne. Les appels d'offres devraient être lancés cette \nannée-ci donc dans deux ou trois mois en juillet de cette année-ci. \nMadame la présidente, le service des pertes d'eau, non revenue water, non facturées de \nla CWA compte actuellement cinq personnes, seulement cinq personnes. Grâce au soutien \nbudgétaire de l’AFD (l'Agence Française de Développement) dans le secteur de l'eau, la \nCWA renforcera ce service afin que, d'ici 2027, chacune des six zones de distribution d'eau \ndispose d'une équipe de cinq personnes, dédiées à la détection des fuites et à la gestion des \npertes d'eau non facturées. Cette mesure devrait permettre d'améliorer significativement le \nréseau. \nPar ailleurs, le gouvernement alloue chaque année des fonds à la CWA pour \nl’acquisition d’équipements de détection des fuites d’eau. Un montant de R 12 millions est \nprévu pour l’exercice financier en cours. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente, et je remercie l’honorable \nministre pour sa réponse. Le ministre peut-il confirmer à la Chambre si des tuyaux \nd’alimentation en eau y ont été placés à la hâte, à la veille des élections générales en 2024, en \nviolation des normes de profondeur, entraînant des fuites à répétition ainsi que des difficultés \nd’asphaltage des routes sur plusieurs routes à Quatre Bornes, dont Pousse-Passe Avenue ? \nJe vous remercie, Madame la présidente. \nMr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, à maintes reprises au sein de l’Assemblée \nnationale, j’ai fait référence aux R 700 millions de Pipe Replacement Programme qui a été \nentrepris par la CWA. Une enveloppe de R 700 millions.  \nMalheureusement, les 700 millions, ces fonds n’ont pas été utilisés exclusivement pour \nle Pipe Replacement Programme. Ce n’est que 44 % des paiements qui ont été dirigés vers ce \nprojet. Je l’ai dit plusieurs fois : le non-respect, dans certains cas, des procédures d’appel \nd’offres, des pratiques comptables déficientes dans ces cas-là, pour vous dire qu’aujourd’hui, \nen 2026, on se retrouve, après avoir dépensé R 700 millions dans ce programme, avec de \nnombreux foyers qui restent encore privés d’eau alors que nous avons dépensé autant \nd’argent ! \nFaute de raccordement, des tuyaux demeurent visibles. Je ne sais pas si dans certaines \nrégions, les honorables membres sont au courant que de nombreux tuyaux restent visibles, \nlaissés à même le sol dans certaines localités. Pour vous dire, si je dois demander au ministère \ndes Finances, dans le prochain budget, de l’argent pour faire enfouir ces tuyaux, vous \nréaliserez qu’il faudra peut-être un budget de R 200 à R 300 millions pour l’enfouissement de \nces tuyaux. \nAlors, il faudra qu’on se décide. Ce gouvernement ; nous avons hérité de ce que nous \navons hérité. Il faudra savoir : est-ce que nous allons mettre de l’argent, R 300 millions, dans \nl’enfouissement des tuyaux ou nous allons mettre de l’argent pour améliorer le service de \ndistribution d’eau ? \n Pour vous dire, donc, nous sommes dans une situation complexe où je ne blâme pas \nl’ancien, celui qui m’a précédé, je ne le blâme pas. Je ne sais pas s’il est là. \nAn hon. Member: Il est là ! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Oh, oh, oh! \nMr Assirvaden: Mais je me permettrais de dire qu’il n’était pas à blâmer parce que \nl’ancien General Manager de la CWA ne répondait pas à ce ministre ! Vous réalisez ? \nAn hon. Member : Pran kass! \nMr Assirvaden: Donc, pour vous dire, R 700 millions, malheureusement, c’est du \nfiasco ! \nMadam Speaker: Yes ! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Peut-on savoir du ministre si le \nprojet pilote de réduction des pertes d’eaux non-revenue water financé par l’Agence française \nde développement (AFD), dont il a fait mention dans sa réponse, pourra démarrer dans la \ncirconscription de Belle Rose et Quatre Bornes, no. 18 ? \nJe vous remercie, Madame la présidente. \n(Interruptions) \nMr Assirvaden: Non, j’ai failli être député là-bas. \nMadam Speaker: Allez-y, M. le ministre ! \nMr Assirvaden: Simplement, pour rassurer : vous savez, le projet est financé par \nl’AFD, Madame la présidente. Le but, c’est de renforcer l’effectif du non-revenue water. \nDonc, nous avons actuellement que cinq personnes dans une zone. Ce que nous voulons avec \nce projet, avec le financement de l’AFD, c’est que dans chaque zone, nous ayons une équipe \nde cinq personnes. \nDonc, pour vous dire, malheureusement, en 2022, l’ancienne équipe avait aboli ce non-\nrevenue water. \nMs Anquetil: Incroyable ! \nMr Assirvaden: Alors que nous perdons plus de 60 % sur notre réseau ! Donc, avec \nl’appui de l’AFD, effectivement, pas que chez vous, honorable membre, mais dans \ndifférentes zones encore, nous aurons une équipe de cinq personnes comprenant ingénieur, \nouvriers, cadre administratif, qui sera postée dans chaque zone et aura la responsabilité de \ns’acquitter de cette tâche pour réduire – nous essayons de réduire – les pertes physiques et \ncommerciales dues à ces tuyaux vieillissants. \nMadam Speaker: Tout va bien ?  \nMs Anquetil: Tout va bien. Merci. \nMadam Speaker: Parfait ! Je lève la séance pour une heure et demie. On revient à \ndeux heures et demie. \nAt 1.00 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.36 p.m., with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nENDOCRINOLOGY/DIABETOLOGY – SPECIALIST/SENIOR SPECIALIST – \nPOST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/180",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 180,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/180) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the post of Specialist/Senior \nSpecialist in the field of Endocrinology/Diabetology, he will state the – \n(a) \nduties and scope of practice thereof, indicating whether they are authorised to \nperform invasive procedures, including wound opening and surgical interventions \nin the management of diabetic foot and, if not, the reasons therefor, and \n(b) \npatients requiring such procedures are systematically referred to other specialists \nand, if so, whether a review of the existing protocols will be considered to allow \nfor specialised diabetic foot care within the discipline of diabetology.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, in accordance to \nthe prescribed Scheme of Service, a Specialist/Senior Specialist is responsible for provision \nof an effective and efficient clinical service in his speciality. \nIn this respect, he responsible to the Regional Health Director through the Consultant in \nCharge of the relevant field for the following – \n1. \nto perform clinical and other work pertaining to his speciality, \n2. \nto mentor and train junior medical nursing and other have personal; \n3. \nto initiate and participate in surveys and research activities and publications; \n4. \nto contribute to the development of health programmes. \nThere are no rigidly prescribed duties or narrowly defined scope of practice specified to \nspecialists in the field of Endocrinology and Diabetology. In fact, endocrinology and \ndiabetology by their very nature are dynamic and multidisciplinary fields encompassing \nmetabolic, hormonal, cardiovascular, renal and neurosurgical aspects of care. As such, \nclinical responsibilities are exercised within a collaborative patient-centred model rather than \nconfined to a fixed list of tasks.  \nI am further informed that the management of complex wounds and surgical \ninterventions and patient care is delivered through a multidisciplinary team approach. This \nparticularly involves close collaboration between Endocrinologists, Diabetologists, and other \nSpecialists such as surgeons, Vascular Surgeons, Wound Care Specialist, nurses and allied \nhealth professionals depending on the clinical need of the patient. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, diabetic foot management is \nusually referred to a multidisciplinary team as per International Best Practice Guidelines and \nis as follows – \n(i) \nRadiologists who look after the vascular part in order to inform the surgeon \nregarding blood circulation in the affected foot; \n(ii) \nGeneral surgeons who evaluate and give treatment for diabetic foot ulcers; \n(iii) Vascular Surgeons may do a bypass of the artery to supply regions which are \naffected by diabetes; \n(iv) Pathologists verify tissues for histopathology, and \n(v) \nDiabetologists who offer medication and advice to control medical aspects of \ndiabetes. \nThe protocol of diabetic footcare delivery will be reviewed during the visit of Dr. \nMarie-France Kong, Consultant Diabetologist, from United Kingdom, and her team, \nscheduled for June 2026. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Rookny: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Would the hon. Minister agree that given \nthe very high number of amputations resulting from diabetes, would it not be a better \napproach to follow the US and the UK in allowing Diabetologists to perform treatment for \nopen wound for diabetic foot? \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, well, I am not in the medical field but this is the \ninformation which has been given to me. In fact, this system was set up a little bit by our hon. \nPrime Minister in the early, I think, 2013 or 2014, the new code was established and that was \nunder his guidance. There was one eminent professor from England who came and who set \nup all these guidelines. \nI do hope with the advent of the professor who is coming to Mauritius, we will get \nmore information and we will try to get more advice from him. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I will just ask the hon.  Minister, since we \nare talking about specialist and Endocrinologist and Diabetologists, in the same vein there is \nalways a very narrow area of the scope of duties that are expected from specialists while the \nsole authority to allow a specialist to practice in Mauritius relies under the purview of the \nMedical Council. \nMay I ask the hon.  Minister whether he could see with the Medical Council how to \ngive the scope of duties or the boundaries to which particular specialists are allowed to work \nand do procedures or treatment because, today, we are seeing specialists… \nMadam Speaker: Do not argue, ask him a question. \nDr. Aumeer: Yes, one specialist which is outside the remit of another specialist doing \nthe job and you get complications and patients who at the end suffer the brunt of it. \nMr Bachoo: I will take it up at the level of my Ministry with is our consultants who are \nthere and I will try to get their advice and then communicate to the Medical Council. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Alright everybody? \nYes, one more? \nMr Rookny: Could the hon. Minister please advise if the Surgeons, the General \nSurgeons, to whom cases of diabetic footcare are referred, do they receive regular and \nspecialised training for treating these types of problems? \nMr Bachoo: We have got the General Surgeons, number one, and I hope that they are \nproperly trained. At the same time, we have got many qualified nurses in that field, many \ndoctors also, who were looking after them. We have got not only surgeons but we have got \ncompetent doctors, Diabetologists, whom we have in our hospitals. But I do recognise that \nthere is a shortage of such doctors and I do hope that in the near future we are going to recruit \na bit more. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Alright, good! \nNow we have First Member for Savanne & Black River. \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 14 – SOCIAL HOUSING – WAITING LIST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/181",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 181,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/181) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River)  asked the \nMinister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to social housing, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the National Social Living Development Ltd., information as to the \nnumber of units thereof currently available and the number of applicants therefor on the \nwaiting list in Constituency No. 14 and at national level, respectively, indicating the \nallocation procedures and the timeline therefor.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Thank you, Madam Speaker. The 8000 residential units were designed \nto cater for 400 units per constituency. I am informed by the NSLD that as date, the \nconstruction of 2438 housing units including on-site and off-site infrastructural works have \nbeen completed over 12 sites across the island. \nI am further informed that as at 26 March 2026, out 56,794 applicants for the whole \nisland, there were 3574 for Constituency No.14. \nIn regard to allocation procedures, or applicants for housing units are, I understand \nfrom the NHDC, called for an interview whereby they are also requested to submit all \nrelevant documents thereafter. Only those who meet the established eligibility criteria are \nshort listed. \nI am given to understand that once an applicant has been found to be eligible for a \nhousing unit, the time taken for delivery of the unit to the beneficiary, depends on two major \nfactors – \n(a) \nthe approval of the loan by the lending institution in most cases, commercial \nbanks, and \n(b) \nsignature of deed of sale. \nAccording to information provided to me, it is expected that by the end of August 2026, \nthe 2438 housing units which are ready will have been delivered.  \nLet me take this opportunity once again, Madam Speaker, to underline that there is a set \neligibility criterion at the level of the NHDC. The first one is based on ownership; that the \napplicant should not be owner of the housing unit or a plot of residential land subject to \nparagraph (b) – an applicant or spouse who is the owner of undivided rights in the property \nby way of succession, inheritance” is eligible for an NHDC, NSLD housing unit where the \ninherited property cannot be conveniently divided in kind among the co-heirs to allow the \nconstruction or allocation of an individual housing unit to each heir. \nSo, those eligibility criteria – and I would like to underline the following – that there is \nan income threshold of Rs48,000, that the applicant is considered to have the repayment \ncapacity to service the mortgage debt for the purchase of NHDC housing unit and the \napplicants selected for the NSLD house unit are directed to financial institutions for the \npurchase. \nNow, the eligibility criteria, I would like to underline that the couple married or in pre-\nunion or joint applicants or single applicants; divorced, widow, single parent with – \n• \nfour or more dependents, they earn 10 points; \n• \nwith three dependents, they earn 9 marks; \n• \nwith two dependents, they earn 8 marks, and \n• \nwith one dependent, they earn 7 marks, and \n• \ncouples or joint applicants without dependents, 6 marks; \n• \ndivorced, widowed, old age pensions without dependents, 5 marks. \nSo, try not to get divorced but with regard to households which are not given any \nmarks, other types of households, zero marks. Now, the catchment area also is of relevance \nand hardship cases – a lot of people ask me those questions – they are – \n• \nvictims of fire, cyclone, floods and other natural disasters;  \n• \nvictims of domestic violence; \n• \nsingle parents with dependents; \n• \npersons with severe medical conditions or impairments, and \n• \nofficers of the NHDC carry out site visits and liaise with relevant authorities to \nassess the genuineness of the applicants under the hardship criteria. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, thank you, hon. Minister. Yes? \nMr Jugurnauth: Madam Speaker, can the Minister inform the House where matters \nstand concerning the project of 90 houses for the site of Surinam, whether it is going on or \nnot? \nMr Mohamed: I believe that this House referred to No. 14 in Surinam. I am getting to \nthat right now. With regard to Surinam, he is most probably talking about the one that has \nstopped. There has been – I do not know if he is referring to the one which was where Kuros \nwas responsible for the construction. There has been non-compliance with the contractual \nobligations. I speak from memory, non-compliance with contractual obligations and the \nNSLD has put an end to contracts with regard to the company called Kuros and followed all \nprocedures in order to bring an end to that.  \nHowever, basically the project is not over. There is the need to ensure that houses that \ncould not be completed because of breach of contract on the part of the contractor, are \nproceeded with and therefore, the NSLD is going to ensure that this is continued. So, it is not \nover. Unfortunately, it has been delayed and under the old regime, there are certain \ncontractors clearly who have been paid a lot of money but who have not, in any way, given \nresults. Unfortunately, there was a laissez-aller which was totally uncalled for, criminal in \nbehaviour I must say, and taxpayers’ money was thrown left, right and centre, as though they \nowned the thing and they were like there was no tomorrow. So, at the end of the day, you end \nup with what you end up with, which is basically not much to really write home about. \nSo, we have to wipe and clear up the mess. So, this is precisely what we are \nendeavouring to do and I can assure the hon. Member and the inhabitants of that \nConstituency that the job is not over but we are going ensure that it is completed and that \nthere is value for money. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Babajee, then hon. Jhummun. \nMr Babajee: Will the hon. Minister consider squatters to have some special criteria for \nthose social houses as the number of squatters in the west is increasing? \nMr Mohamed: It is a very interesting question indeed – and very often, a lot of people \nor at least my predecessor and those who have been around for a few years during the last \nregime – what has happened in No. 14 and I am going to say it very bluntly, forgive me for \nthat because that is truth – some people have encouraged and those people know who. Some \npeople who were in ministerial positions have encouraged people to go and squat. Go and \nsquat and you shall be régularisé and in the circumstance of what had happened, is that you \nhave proliferation of squatters, specifically in Constituency No. 14 and the hon. Member \nknows well together with his colleagues where. So, this proliferation has led to a situation of \nproblem with regards to infrastructure, problem with regards to law and order and there is a \ntotal indiscipline.  \nWe end up with a situation, Madam Speaker, where people believe that because they \nare squatters, they are entitled to a plot of land given by the State. The answer is no. There is \nno automatic entitlement because if we are to go along your suggestion – because I take it is \nonly a suggestion and we are here to at least discuss constructively – to under the hardship \ncase to put in squatters, I can assure the hon. Member, Madam Speaker, that we are going to \nhave not only a proliferation of squatters, we are going to have people even with houses squat \nthe place because they think it is a God-given right to them to get a plot of land. No!  \nOn the other hand, you have people who have real hardships as it is in the eligibility \ncriteria and we have to help them and we will help them whereas people who end up going to \nplaces to squat simply because in return, they expect it to be given to them free of charge, that \ncannot be tolerated. Yes, we will show ourselves generous to people and understandable, \ncompassionate to people who are on a plot of land, who had no other choice than to go there \nand they have not come to knock at our door to say ‘give it to me as a matter of right’. It is \nbecause we understand, ça doit être régularisé, we do it on a case-to-case basis. \nSo, we cannot continue tolerating this indiscipline. So, in answer to your question, the \nanswer is no. It will not be put under the criteria of hardship eligibility because that would be \nopening the flood gates and doing the same thing that was done by a former Minister, whom \nyou know very well. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Jhummun! \nMr Jhummun: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Following the answer of the hon. Minister \nto hon. Jugurnauth, does the same issues arise for No. 13, regarding the houses still pending \nand we are unable to give them to house seekers? \nMr Mohamed: The bad news is that yes, in the Constituency No. 13 that happens to be \nthe first constituency I was elected in and I have good memory of that constituency, yes, it is \nthe same situation because that very company is guilty of laches and breach of contract and \nwe have had to take action once again because we cannot sit down idly and see a company \nwhich has been paid by taxpayers’ money blatantly breach the contract. We cannot do that. \nSo, we had to act. We have taken the decision. The reason for the delay in that constituency \nas well as No. 14 is precisely the fault of the contractor. So, let us not cry over spilt milk. \nWhat is the solution? The solution is that there has to be a bidding process for a contractor to \nbe chosen to complete the job. And yes, I know that there are certain inhabitants in certain \nplaces who have complained because some of the sites – in other constituencies as well – \nwhere  \ncontractors have done wrong and are left in an abandoned state, it is not as though it is over. \nIt will continue but I cannot, as Minister, choose, who is going to be the contractor. There is a \nprocess to follow and it has to be followed in line with the law. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nMr Jhummun: Do you have any idea as to when we can allocate these houses? Any \nidea? \nMr Mohamed: If it could have been done yesterday, I would have been the happiest. \nNo, it is not only a question of money but for that… \nMadam Speaker: Short and sweet! \nMr Mohamed: No, I mean once upon a time, they used to say as soon as possible but \nto be honest, it is a construction and for construction, you cannot have a set date on it. Once \nthe bidding process is completed, we will have a date, estimated completion and then as we \nhope, it will be done quicker. So, our intention and our aim are to finish very quickly because \nwe know that there are a lot of people waiting for those. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Beechook? \nMr Beechook: Yes, Madam Speaker. I thank the hon. Minister for this reply. I would \nask the hon. Minister how much this disaster is going to cost additionally to the NSLD? \nMr Mohamed: This disaster has led us to see how we can mitigate the risk because we \ncannot just let costs increase. So, a risk mitigation has been implemented. That is why we put \nan end to the contract.  \nNow, there were certain performance guarantees that were held and were viewed by \nfinancial institutions. Forgive me, I am only speaking from memory. I know for a fact that we \nhave tapped onto that. But still, there will be losses. I cannot put it in figures.  \nWhat annoys me in terms of prejudice here – let alone the financial prejudice – are the \nhearts of many of those, who are waiting for houses, that are broken. They are impatient, and \nit is legitimate on their part to get a roof over their heads. I am aware of it. I have heard them. \nI have spoken to many of them. But I can assure you, through this House, Madam Speaker, as \nI have said, that we will endeavour to complete those projects. Not only that, we will \nendeavour to start new ones as well. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Your memory seems okay! \nHon. Ramdass, yes! \nMAURITIUS POST LTD SERVICES – PAYMENT MODALITY \n\n54",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/182",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 182,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/182) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in \nregard to services provided in post offices, including payment of bills and road tax, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Post Ltd., information as to the \naccepted modes of payment thereat.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: Madam Speaker, I would like to thank the hon. Member for this \nquestion. \nI am informed by Mauritius Post Ltd. that it currently operates a total of 114 outlets, \nincluding five in Rodrigues and one in Agalega. Out of these 114 outlets in Mauritius, 100 \nare providing postal services such as delivery of letters, parcels, selling of stamps and non-\npostal services as well. A total of 55 postal and 24 non-postal. \nMadam Speaker, Mauritius Post Ltd. has further informed me that 91 of those post \noffices are equipped with fully operational point of sale systems whereby payment by cards \nfor CEB bills and postal services are currently being accepted. Mauritius Post Ltd. is in \ndiscussion with the NLTA, CWA and MT to provide for alternative modes of electronic \npayment.  \nI am further informed that payment by card for a minimum of Rs200 can, in fact, be \naccepted by Mauritius Post Ltd. in so far as the utility company concerned gives relevant \ninstructions to Mauritius Post Ltd. The issue reported, therefore, is not that of technical \nfeasibility, but that of financial viability. Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Ramdass! \nMr Ramdass: Madam Speaker, in respect of payment of NLTA services, le ministre \nétant lui-même un érudit de la technologie, à un moment où nous faisons de moins en moins \nde paiements en espèces, conviendrait-il qu’il est grand temps d’autoriser, voire même \nd’encourager d’autres moyens de paiements numériques tels que Juice, my.t money, cartes de \ncrédit, etc. ? Serait-il disposé à engager des pourparlers en ce sens auprès des bureaux de \npostes de l’île Maurice ? \nMadam Speaker: M. le ministre ! \nDr. Ramtohul: Thank you, hon. Member for the supplementary question. I think, in \nMauritius of 2026, we need to have people online, not in line, to effect payments at \ngovernment counters.  \nMy Ministry is actually attending some committees, under the Bank of Mauritius, to \nlook into the possibility of even having government counters accept payment by electronic \nmodes. Not just the Mauritius Post.  \nAs a Ministry, we are working towards a point where people will be able to effect all \ntheir payments online. So, one extension of the KOREK app will be to also accept the online \nrenewal of MVL through the app, and payment modal will also be electronic, obviously. So, \nyes, we are doing it. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Not happy? One more! \nMr Ramdass: Madam Speaker, that is, obviously, in respect of online apps, but how \nabout the counters in the specific units of the Mauritius Post? Will the hon. Minister consider \nthe possibility of authorising payments by electronic means at those counters for NLTA \nservices? At the moment, it is not the case. \nMadam Speaker: At the counters, hon. Minister! \nDr. Ramtohul: So, it is a decision to be made by the NLTA. Why? Because there is a \ncommission that is applicable on the payment received via cards. Even via Juice. So, a \ndecision needs to be made by the NLTA. Once the instructions have been provided, the \nMauritius Post will be able to accept the payments. We are awaiting authorisation from the \nauthority involved. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, I think we have got it now.  \nSo, Mr Apollon, Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien! \nMAHEBOURG HOSPITAL – METHADONE DISTRIBUTION – PROPOSED \nRELOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/183",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 183,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/183) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the proposed relocation of \nthe methadone distribution from the Mahebourg Hospital to a dedicated Methadone \nDistribution Centre in January 2026, he will state where the matters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, there are presently two methadone dispensing sites in \nMahebourg, namely at Mahebourg Hospital with 363 patients, and Mahebourg Methadone \nDay Care Centre, through caravan, with 192 patients. Both sites operate between 06.00 a.m. \nto 08.00 a.m. \nMadam Speaker, there have been several requests to delocalise the methadone \ndispensing site from Mahebourg Hospital to the yard of Mahebourg Methadone Day Care \nCentre, through caravan, mainly because some patients cause trouble within the hospital \npremises. However, this relocation cannot be envisaged due to the fact that the total number \nof methadone beneficiaries taking their doses at the Methadone Day Care Centre would \nincrease to more than 500. This could pose safety issues for staff, beneficiaries as well as the \nneighbourhood. Moreover, in case of any scuffles or fights, the situation may be more \ndifficult to control since the site where the day care centre is located is small and enclosed by \na fencing. \nMadam Speaker, the House may wish to note that a joint technical working group had \nbeen set up between the National Agency for Drug Control (NADC), as the apex body \nlooking at the drug scourge, and my Ministry to look into the various aspects regarding \nmethadone dispensing. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Apollon! \nMr Apollon: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I already had a meeting with the NADC, \nwhere I proposed an old police quarter which is not in use. Can I ask the Minister to consider \nthis old police quarter for the distribution of methadone at Mahebourg? \nMr Bachoo: I will take up this matter with NADC in the forthcoming meeting that we \nwill be having. I will try to propose the site.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Ms Savabaddy! \nMs Savabaddy: Thank you, Madam Speaker. The hon. Minister will agree with me \nthat methadone distribution creates a lot of problems in most regions. Has there been any \ncomprehensive study over the situation so as to bring appropriate solutions? Thank you. \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, there is no appropriate solution. In any place or any part \nof the country, wherever we put up any centre for methadone distribution, we start having \ncomplaints as from the following day. So, I do not know where we have to put it up.  \nIn the beginning, it was at the police stations. The police objected to it. We moved to \nthe hospitals, the doctors protested. We moved to some area health centres, there was hue and \ncry everywhere. These people are patients and need to be treated, and you have to be very \ncareful while dealing with these patients. \nMadam Speaker: We have heard you say that before. This is not the first time you are \nsaying this, I think. \nMr Bachoo: There is no other solution. We have to bear with it. We have to live with \nthese patients because, for us, they are patients. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, we are done with methadone for the moment! \nPQ B/184 has been withdrawn.  \nPESTICIDES REGULATORY OFFICE – STAFF REDUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/184",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 184,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floréal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/184) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the \nMinister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to \nthe Pesticides Regulatory Office, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, \ninformation as to the reasons for the reduction in the number of officers posted thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMadam Speaker: So, now, we go to Dr. Aumeer! \nRENT-TO-OWN SCHEME – ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS, HOUSING UNITS \nAVAILABILITY & EXPECTED DELIVERY DATES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/185",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 185,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/185) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the 'Rent-to-Own' \nScheme launched in November 2025, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nNational Housing Development Company Ltd., information as to the number of – \n(a) \neligible applicants therefor, and  \n(b) \nhousing units available thereunder, indicating the respective locations and \nexpected delivery dates thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Madam Speaker, social housing units are reserved for applicants with a \nmonthly household income of up to Rs48,000. However, there are applicants who, though \neligible for a housing unit, do not have the repayment capacity, or in many cases due to \nunfavourable MCIB reports, are unable to secure a loan from financial institutions, or cannot \nbenefit from mortgage facilities from the NHDC.  \nSo as not to debar these applicants from owning a housing unit, since November 2025, \nthe NHDC has, following Government approval, introduced a new financing scheme based \non the Rent-to-Own mechanism to cater for such type of beneficiaries. The Rent-to-Own \nScheme, basically, enables those beneficiaries to rent a housing unit for an initial period of \nfive years with the right to exercise a purchase option anytime. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, the NHDC is, at present, according to the \ninformation given to me at my Ministry, not in a position to provide the exact number of \neligible applicants, as the assessment of beneficiaries is still in progress. \nSo, I am personally not very happy not to give information of that nature because I have \nthe information, Madam Speaker. I have the information as at the 18th of March 2026 as to \nhow many people on “Rent-to-Own” are being considered. So, allow me to give it. Because \nyou see, it’s not in the habit of previous governments to be transparent and I love the idea of \nbeing transparent. \nSo, in spite of what I am told here, I will give the information and it is as follows – \n• For Olivia, there are 212 units, as at 18 March for loan, mortgage credit facility \nand the evaluation of mortgage for rent or rent-to-own by NHDC – 70 are under \nevaluation; \n• For Grand Bel Air – 33 being evaluated; \n• For Valetta – 0; \n• For Mare D’Albert – 14; \n• For Henrietta 3 – 0; \n• For Malherbes – 14; \n• For Pointe aux Piments –33; \n• For Reunion Maurel – 26. \nSo, out of the 1,264 units in those places I made mention, there are 190 that are being \nevaluated for mortgage/rent to own.  \nSo, with regard to part (b), there are no specific number of housing units that are \nearmarked for rent-to-own. In fact, it is for applicants who are de facto eligible but have not \nbeen able to secure a loan from lending institutions. It is those who will have then the choice \nto opt for this scheme. So, the question of the respective location and expected delivery date \ndoes not arise at this point in time. I would like to add that this is, – and I am very proud of \nthis particular scheme, I must admit, this Rent-to-Own Scheme, I am personally very proud \nof it because I came up with the idea and I am thankful to all my colleagues in Cabinet for \nhaving supported this idea and approved this scheme. Some people like to pretend as though \nthat they had that idea but then again, I mean we have a lot of pretenders around. Let them be \npretenders. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: It sounds like a song. \nMr Mohamed: It is! \nMadam Speaker: Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you. Can I ask the hon. Minister whether his Ministry have any \nspecial priority scheme for those who have lost their property overnight due to natural \ncalamities, particularly if they fall in the category of very low income or even on the list of \nthe NEF? Thank you. \nMr Mohamed: In fact, I turn around here and no pun intended, I turned to my left and \nI see my good friend the hon. Minister Subron. In fact, it concerns several Ministries who \nwork together and as we speak the whole idea is – do we have a housing bank or a stock of \nhouses that we can send people to? And the answer is very simple – no, we don’t.  \nSo, what happens is that we have to look around and look for those houses, that’s why \nwe have come up with, there is another question that the hon. Anquetil had put to me here but \nvery rapidly, the maison de transition – this is what I have come up with and I have already \ninformed Cabinet about that only two weeks back. We are going to work together with the \nhon. Ministers, both Subron and Madam Navarre-Marie. Why? Because situations like this, \nwe will have to find a solution, it will be the maison de transition. \nSo, I hope that very quickly we will be able to come up with solutions of this nature. \nThe second aspect, allow me to say that, there are many government buildings that are left \nand unused. You see?  \nSo, in the recent past, many Ministers liked to hold on to properties that vested with \ntheir Ministry and don’t let it go. But this is not the case with this Government. In this \nGovernment, it is clear; it is a team that is working and that team has decided to help one \nanother out. When there are government buildings that are left unused and unutilised, how we \ncan put it to the use of the people, convert into maison d’urgence, maison de transition, used \nfor people who urgently need it under the several Ministries. This is how we work together. \nSo, for those reasons, I must say that the outlook is very good. The outlook is positive \nbecause those are issues that were never addressed in the past and it will be addressed now. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: You are okay Dr.? \nMr Ramkalawon! \nMr Ramkalawon: Hon. Minister, according to this scheme, do you have any fast track \nfor women who have been victims of domestic violence or single mothers or financially in \ndifficulties? \nMr Mohamed: As I have said, in the hardship criteria, we give priority to single \nmothers. I underline the fact that they are mothers. What it entails is that they have children \nand those children have to be catered for, they have to be cared for. My colleagues the hon. \nMinister, Ms Navarre-Marie, and the hon. Minster of Social Security, Mr Subron, both of \nthem are working closely with us. We are working together in order to address those urgent \nissues.  \nSo, yes, they are within the criteria. I also had someone who said: why am I giving \npriority or why are we giving priority to single mothers? In fact, it’s not a question of being \npriority or not, it is showing that we have a heart and, in this side, we have a heart. Thank \nyou. \nMadam Speaker: Les enfants d’abords! Okay I think now we move on to Dr. Ms \nDaureeawo! \nRESIDENTIAL CARE HOMES – REGISTRATION, INSPECTIONS & POLICY \nFRAMEWORK",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/186",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 186,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/186) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \nwhether, in regard to the residential care homes, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Residential Care Home Board, information as to the – \n(a) \ncurrent number thereof being –  \n(i)  \nregistered, and  \n(ii)  unregistered;  \n(b)  frequency of inspections carried out thereat, indicating the number of cases of \nnon-compliance or abuse detected in the course thereof and the actions taken in \nrelation thereto in each case, and  \n(c)  policy framework put in place to ensure compliance with hygiene and safety \nstandards for residents.",
      "answer": "Mr Subron: Madam Speaker, given the issue to be addressed, I am seeking your \nindulgence to enable me to provide a more elaborate reply to this question.   \nI wish to inform the House that in accordance with Section 12 of the Residential Care \nHomes Act 2003, the Residential Care Home Board may, upon application, grant or refuse a \nlicense to a person who intends to operate a residential care home. A license issued is valid \nfor a period of one year and shall be renewed for successive periods of one year upon \napplication made by a licensee. The Residential Care Home Board was last reconstituted in \nSeptember 2025.   \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that as at date, 22 Charitable \nInstitutions and 63 Private Residential Care Homes are registered with my Ministry. I am \ntabling the full list of the Registered Institutions. \nOut of the total of 85 licenses, the licenses of 7 Charitable Institutions and 8 Private \nResidential Care Homes are under process for renewal.  \nI am further informed that for the last five years, only 3 Private Residential Care Homes \nhave ceased operations.  \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a)(ii) of the question, I wish to inform the House \nthat during my tenure as Minister, my Ministry has received 11 cases of unregistered/illegal \nhomes as at date. I am tabling the full list of the reported case of unregistered and illegal \nhomes. \nDuring this period, out of the 11 cases, my Ministry has had 3 important cases to deal \nwith – \n• Case 1: Occurred on 09 May 2025 at Fieldview Care Home situated at Maison \nBlanche, Mon Goût, Pamplemousses. \n• Case 2: Occurred on 07 November 2025 – a suspected illegal Residential Home \nvilla located at Pereybere.  \n• Case 3: During this month, on the 10 March 2026 at Mon Destin Residential \nCare Home located at Forest- Side, where a murder case occurred. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that \nin accordance with Section 20(3) of the Residential Care Homes Act 2003, officers from the \nWelfare and Elderly Protection Unit (WEPU) of my Ministry may at all times enter and \ninspect any building, premises, means of transport and any other facility which are used for \nthe purposes of a Residential Care Home.  \nOfficers of the unit effect monthly visits in registered private homes; and twice monthly \nin charitable institutions to ensure cleanliness, safety, food quality and proper care of the \nresidents. Surprise checks are also effected in residential care homes to detect any case of \nabuse.  \nI am informed that for year 2025, my Ministry has effected 1044 visits and registered 5 \ncases of elderly abuse, which are being monitored.  \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (c) of the question, I must first say that the Junior \nMinister and myself were shocked to note that though provisions have been made in the \nResidential Care Homes Act 2003 to establish contraventions and to institute proceedings for \nany breach of conditions of a license, the existing law has not been fully applied for years, \ncertainly for at least the last 10 years, prior to our taking the office. No rigid corrective action \nhas been taken against Homes in cases of non-compliance. It is clear that the responsible unit \nwas not properly resourced and trained.  \nFurthermore, policy wise, let me inform the House of 10 important measures – \n1) \nSince I took office, cases of ill-treatments and operation of illegal homes have \nbeen promptly and duly reported to the Police and the FCC. The case of \nFieldview has been reported and the case of Pereybere has been duly reported; \n2) \n A 2 months moratorium period was provided to enable both reporting and \nregularisation of illegal homes; \n3) \nFollowing the above, a new protocol has been designed to establish clear \nguidelines and courses of actions to follow in respect of complaints received \nregarding residential care homes, and for handling cases of abuse and illegal \nhomes; \n4) \nA Ministerial Committee was instituted in this context, to ensure transfers of \nresidents from potential illegal homes, to safe places; \n5) \nA new Board under the Residential Care Homes Act 2003 was put in place in \nSeptember as I said, and is now fully operational; \n6) \nAfter the very disturbing events reported at Mon Destin Home, Curepipe, this \nmonth – \n(a) \nThe Residential Care Home Board has promptly met on 18 March 2026 and \nacted upon the advice of the SLO on 23 March 2026 to declare that the Mon \nDestin Residential Care Home located in Forest- Side, was in an illegal \nsituation;  \n(b) \nI have immediately directed the WEPPU to conduct a full audit of all \nResidential Homes in Mauritius. \n(c) \nI am writing to the Commissioner of Police to conduct joint inquiries, with \nthe Ministry, under Section 20 of the Residential Care Home Act 2003. This \nsection was never applied previously.  \n7) \nMy Ministry is also working on the Terms of Reference to appoint a team of \nconsultants to audit and make recommendations to fundamentally review the \nwhole system of residential care home in Mauritius; \n8) \nAs a transition, my Ministry is working, on urgent transitional amendments to be \nbrought to the Residential Care Homes Regulations 2005, to ensure that all \nlicensed homes provide a list of relevant  \ninformation on their residents on a regular basis to my Ministry, more so, that at \npresent the police is suspecting cases of human trafficking.  \n9) \nIn the immediacy, the Cabinet recently has agreed to the Proclamation of Section \n9 of Protection of Elderly People Act (PEPA), which will allow for better \nprotection of the elderly.  \n10) In parallel, my Ministry is preparing institutional changes and budget proposals \nfor the massive training of carers to provide their service to both Residential Care \nHomes institutions and at domicile care. \nAs per policy of my Ministry, intensive consultation will take place in the preparation \nof the new measures announced.  \nMadam Speaker, I wish to highlight that the Mauritian society is facing major \nchallenges with social mutation underway in recent years.  \nThe shift in the family structure, from extended to nuclear family, compounded with \naging population, with significant emigration of our youth and adults, with housing crisis, and \nwith working time pattern, are concurrently – \n• \nCausing serious caring issues for our elderly and people with disabilities and \nmental health issues, and   \n• \nCausing serious caring and nurturing issues for our youth, aggravated by the drug \nproblem in Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker, our society and institutions have not dedicated the proper attention \nand resources to these social mutations. Now, the very future of our society will depend on us \naddressing these fundamental challenges.  \nThis is my mission and that of the Junior Minister, and of this Government.  \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. \nYes, Dr. Ms. Daureeawo, you are, okay?  \nHon. First Member for Savanne. \nI am sorry. Can we backpedal?  \nJ’introduis une nouvelle méthode. I am sorry I missed Mr Rookny; I did not see him. I am \nsorry, Mr Babajee.  \nMr Rookny, but you have to speak out.  \nMr Rookny: I will. That’s so kind of you. Could the hon. Minister please advise how \nmany licenses have been given for the construction or establishment of new residential care \nhomes over the last two years? \nMr Subron: I have the figures since the new board has been appointed. \nSince September 2025, the new board has approved 70 licences, out of which, 68 \nlicences have been issued as at date. The 70 approvals are detailed as follows – \n• \n64 renewals of licences; \n• \n6 new licences, and  \n• \n2 licences which were applied for what is called the INS principle. Approval has \nbeen received by the board and has not been granted by my Ministry for \nnoncompliance with law, the Residential Care Home Act 2023.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nThank you so much. Mr Babajee. I am trying to be as fair as I can.  \nMay I, since we are on this issue because we had a problem the other day with one \nother member who tried to catch my eye; sometimes it’s better to catch my ear than my eye. \nThank you. \nNow, Mr Babajee, the floor is yours.  \n \nBLACK RIVER – AVAILABLE FOOTBALL GROUNDS – INFRASTRUCTURAL \nCONDITIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/187",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 187,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/187) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Black River district, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe number of football grounds available thereat, indicating the number thereof \nwhich are fully operational, indicating the infrastructural conditions thereof in \neach case, and  \n(b)  whether consideration will be given for the construction of football grounds at Le \nMorne, Chamarel, Case Noyale and Rivière Noire, respectively.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, with regard part(a) of the question, I am informed that \nthere are currently 17 football grounds in the district of Black River. Out of these, 12 falls \nunder the responsibility of the District Council of Black River, 3 are privately owned and 2 \nfall under the responsibility of the Ministry of Education and Human Resource.  \nOut of the 17 football grounds, 16 are fully operational and in good condition while the \nAlbion football ground is presently undergoing upgrading works. I am tabling the detailed list \nthereof indicating the location, ownership, operational status, condition and facilities \navailable at each site. \nI am further informed that upgrading works at the Albion football ground comprising \nfencing and boundary wall construction, were awarded on 03 December 2025 for a contract \nsum of Rs5.7 million and are being implemented as scheduled with completion expected by \nend of April 2026. \nWhile most of the football grounds are operational, I wish to highlight that not all are \nequipped with complete amenities such as lighting, fencing, cloakroom, and ancillary \nfacilities. \nThese gaps have already been identified and are being addressed progressively through \nplanned upgrading programmes and future budgetary provision.  \nMadam Speaker, in regard to part (b) of the question, I am advised as follows, with \nrespect to Le Morne, a project for the construction of a new football ground has been clearly \nidentified and proposed under the capital project 2026-2027 for an estimated amount of \nRs125 million.  \nThe project is comprehensive in nature and includes – \n• \nrelocation of high voltage overhead cables; \n• \nconstruction of retaining walls;  \n• \ndraining system due to site constraints,  \n• \ncut and fill works; \n• \nprovision for full modern facilities, including fencing, lighting, bleachers, \ncloakroom, parking, and associated amenities. \nHowever, implementation of the project is subject to completion of land acquisition \nprocedures, which are initiated since 2023, and are currently being processed at the level of \nthe Ministry of Housing and Lands. This is a statutory prerequisite. Once same is finalised, \nthe project will proceed without any further delay. \nI also wish to emphasise that in the meantime, residents of Le Morne are not deprived \nof access up to football ground. They are currently making use of an existing football ground \nwithin the locality.  \nMadam Speaker, as regards Chamarel, I am informed that the project was initiated in \nOctober 2020, but encountered serious implementation issues, including non-performance of \nthe initial contractor, which led to the termination of the contract in April 2022. Subsequently, \nthe project was restructured and implemented in phases to safeguard public funds and ensure \nproper delivery. \nWorks relating to drainage, retaining walls and partial boundary infrastructure have \nalready been completed through subsequent contracts. I am further informed that the \nremaining components required to render the football ground fully operational include – \n• \nCompletion of boundary wall; \n• \nFencing on remaining sides; \n• \nProvision of lighting facilities; \n• \nLaying of top soil and grass, and  \n• \nConstruction of cloakroom, parking and associated amenities. \nIn this regard, a provision of Rs25 million has been proposed under the capital project \n2026-2027 to complete the outstanding works and ensure that the facility becomes fully \noperational.  \nMadam Speaker, as regards Case Noyale, I am informed that the locality already has \naccess to a football ground situated at Avenue Rose near volleyball pitch which is privately \nowned by South West Safari, but currently being used by the inhabitants.  \nSimilarly, with regard to Rivière Noire, I am informed that the region already benefits \nfrom two existing football grounds, namely at Grande Rivière Noire and Petite Rivière Noire. \nBoth are under the responsibility of the District Council and are currently being used by the \npublic.  \nMadam Speaker, I wish to emphasise that government is adopting a structured and \nresponsible approach in the development of sports infrastructure, with projects being \nimplemented in line with funds availability from the Ministry of Finance, under the capital \nproject programme and based on the established priorities of the district council.  \nIn this regard, close collaboration at the local level remains essential. I would \nencourage the hon. Member to liaise with the Chairperson and the district council so that \nprojects may be planned an implemented quickly in the best interests of the communities \nconcerned. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Jugurnauth! \nMr Jugurnauth: Madam Speaker, is the hon. Minister aware that at the Tamarin \nFootball Playground, there is a community health centre where every day, patients and \ndoctors also use this as parking? The space is in a very bad condition, and the pitch also. Will \nthe hon. Minister apply some rules? What will be done in the future? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister! \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, for the Tamarin Football Ground, we have an upcoming \nproject – fencing and boundary walls on one side only. I have all the information concerning \nthe Tamarin Football Ground.  \nIf you come up with a substantive question in the next meeting, I can give you more \ninformation concerning this one. \n Madam Speaker: Will that be okay? But regarding the question of parking of \nvehicles? \nMr Woochit: Sorry? \nMadam Speaker: On the football ground. \nMr Woochit: Yes, but only the information that… \nMadam Speaker: Are you aware? \nMr Woochit: No. We can check it. \nMr Jugurnauth: Madam Speaker, concerning the project of Chamarel Football \nGround, will the hon. Minister inform the House about the name of the contractor who \ncarried out the work in 2020? What were the costs when he left the site? \nMadam Speaker: I am allowing you because it is the same region, but how will the \nMinister know all this? I am not sure! It is not directly related. \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, for Chamarel, the contract was awarded to Pybig \nConstruction Ltd. for an amount of Rs4.2 million.  \nMadam Speaker: I am sure everybody understands, but I do not. Does not matter! Are \nyou happy with that answer? \nMr Jugurnauth: Sure. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, can we move on? I mean happy that he has given you an \nanswer.  \nYes, hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES - REGISTERED FARMERS & SUPPORT SCHEMES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/188",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 188,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/188) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to small \nfarmers, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Small Farmers Welfare Fund, \ninformation as to the number of registered farmers from mainland Mauritius, Rodrigues \nIsland and Agalega, respectively, over the past five years, indicating the number of farmers of \nRodrigues Island – \n(a) \nawaiting renewal of their farmers' cards and the expected delivery dates thereof, \nand \n(b) \nbenefiting from the Smart Agri-Business Programme, the Farm Production \nSupport Programme, the Risk Management Programme and the Quality-of-Life \nProgramme, respectively.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, hon. François.  \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that farmers are registered with the Small Farmers \nWelfare Fund in line with Section 16 of the Small Farmers Welfare Fund. Upon their \nregistration, the farmers are provided with a farmer’s card which give them access to facilities \nand schemes provided by government.  \nThe farmer’s card is renewed every two years. There are currently 12,047 farmers \nregistered with the Small Farmers Welfare Fund in Mauritius, and 1,067 farmers registered \nfrom Rodrigues. There are no farmers from Agalega registered with the Small Farmers \nWelfare Fund.  \nWith your permission, Madam Speaker, I will table the number of farmers registered \nwith the Small Farmers Welfare Fund for Mauritius and Rodrigues for the last five years, as \ncompiled by the Small Farmers Welfare Fund. \nAs regards part (a), Madam Speaker, I am informed that as at date the Small Farmers \nWelfare Fund has already sent the 1,067 farmer’s card to the Commission for Agriculture of \nRodrigues Regional Assembly for distribution to all farmers who had applied for renewal. \nNow, the renewal of the farmer’s card for additional farmers would be considered as \nand when they would apply for renewal. I understand that the Commission for Agriculture \nhas already delivered 609 cards, and the remaining will be delivered within the next two \nweeks. \nWith regard to part (b), Madam Speaker, I am further informed by the Small Farmers \nWelfare Fund that a total of 412 registered farmers has benefited from the Small Agri-\nbusiness Programme, the Farm Production Support Programme, the Risk Management \nProgramme, and the Quality-of-Life Programme over the last five years. I will table the \ndetails of all the beneficiaries.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. François! \nMr François: Merci, l’honorable ministre, pour la rapidité dans l’action après ma \nquestion de vendredi dernier. Hier, à Rodrigues, quelques éleveurs et planteurs ont reçu leurs \ncartes tant attendues depuis longtemps. \nAn hon. Member: Bravo! \nMadam Speaker: Wow! \nMr François: Est-ce que l’honorable ministre peut confirmer à la Chambre si la SFWF \nremettra des cartes to all the 1,423 planters, the 424 éleveurs et les 3,027 éleveurs et \nplanteurs de Rodrigues d’ici la fin de l’année ? \nDr. Boolell: This is a tall question, but if you insist and you impress upon me, I will \ncertainly convey the strong signals of a friend and tell them that they have to bow to the \nlegitimate request made by the hon. Member from Rodrigues. \nMadam Speaker: Wow! Thank you, hon. Minister. Thank you. I like this! \nMr François: Hon. Minister, may I know how much it costs, if you have the \ninformation, per year by a farmer for their registration with the SFWF to obtain a farmer’s \ncard. \nDr. Boolell: I will advise you to peruse the document what I will lay on the Table. \nMadam Speaker: Il est insatiable. \nThe hon. Second for Member Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien! \nBATS – POPULATION INCREASE – CULLING EXERCISE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/189",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 189,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/189) Mr T. Apollo (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to bats, he will state – \n(a) \nwhether an increase in the population thereof has been observed, and  \n(b) \nwhen the last culling exercise thereof was carried out, and \n(c) \nthe measures being envisaged to address the impact thereof on local fruits.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, hon. Member. Now, Madam Speaker, with regard \nto part (a) the of the question, I am informed that the National Parks and Conservation \nService that has been carrying out surveys on the Mauritius fruit-bat population since 2006.  \nAlthough, the local bat population has increased from 22,000 in 2006 to around \n132,000 in 2020, it has remained stable over the last five years. The most recent survey \nundertaken in November and December 2025 recorded approximately 120,000 bats across the \nisland. \nAs regard part (b) of the question, I am informed that the last culling exercise was \nconducted by the previous government in November and December 2020 whereby 1,160 \nMauritius fruit-bat were killed. \nMadam Speaker, the House will note that the Mauritius fruit-bat is listed as endangered \nin the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List of Threatened Species and is \none of the last remaining native mammals surviving in the Republic of Mauritius. \nAs regards part (c) of the question, it is a fact that the Ministry has to respond to \nlegitimate concern of farmers regarding damages caused by bats. A grant of 50% is offered \nby Government and the cost of anti-bird nets to cover a maximum of five trees for backyard \nand 60 tree for orchards. \nAn amount of Rs22.5 million has been disbursed by the Food and Agricultural \nResearch and Extension Institute to 2,976 beneficiaries under the Fruit Protection Scheme \nover a period of November 2024 to March 2026. \n I am advised that these nets have proven to be an effective means of control against the \ndamages caused by fruit-bats. Nonetheless, following complaints received from planters, \nother measures such as ultrasound devices and the use of repellents are being envisaged to \ndeter and mitigate caused by bats to fruit crops. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: All right? Okay! \nSecond Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes! \nLATE MRS Y. B – 3-YEAR-OLD GIRL & 7-MONTH-OLD BABY BOY – SAFETY & \nPROTECTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/190",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 190,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/190) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the three-\nyear-old girl and the seven-month-old baby boy of late Mrs Y. B. she will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain information as to the arrangements made to ensure the safety and \nprotection thereof and the assistance extended for the well-being thereof.",
      "answer": "Ms Navarre-Marie: Madam Speaker, on 10 March 2026, it was reported in the press \nthat Mrs Y. B. was missing and her partner Mr A.R. was arrested as there was suspected foul \nplay. I am informed that Mrs Y. B. was a victim of domestic violence which was reported to \nmy Ministry to the Family Support Services of Goodlands. She was granted an interim \nprotection order which she later withdrew. \nOn 11 March 2026, following the arrest of Mr A.R., father of two minors, the officers \nof my Ministry immediately enquired on the whereabouts of the children. They were \ninformed by La Brigade pour la Protection de la Famille that the children were under the \ncare of one Mrs D. N., a friend of the biological father and that Mrs D. N., together with the \nminors were currently at the Major Crime Investigating Team (MCIT). \nOn the same day, the officers of my Ministry attended the office of the MCIT for a \npsychosocial assessment of the minors in the presence of Mrs D. N. as she had been \ndesignated at that time by the biological father of two children to act as the responsible party \nfor the two minors. \nI am further informed that later on during that day, the paternal uncle of the minors Mr \nU.R. attended the MCIT’s office where he expressed the wish to look after the minors. \nMadam Speaker, on 13 March 2026, the officers of my Ministry effected a site visit at \nthe residence of Mr U. R., at Eau Coulée for a psychological assessment. The paternal uncle, \nMr U. R., had informed that the biological father had asked him to look after his children. \nConsequently, the paternal uncle was entrusted the care and responsibility of the minors. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that on 16 March 2026, the paternal uncle was \ncontacted for an update on the present status of the children and my officers were informed \nthat both minors were faring well. \nOn 20 March 2026, my officers conducted a home visit and the children were found to \nbe faring well. The paternal uncle reiterated his willingness to care for the minors and \nrequested information with regard to the legal procedures to be followed for their custody. \nAn appointment was scheduled by the officers of my Ministry with the legal resource \nperson on 26 March 2026 which Mr U. R, the paternal uncle attended. Legal advice was \nprovided to him. Continuous psychological support is being provided to the minors and close \nfollow-up is being maintained in this case. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Je remercie la Ministre pour sa \nréponse. L’honorable Ministre peut-elle informer la Chambre si l’oncle paternel qui prend \nactuellement en charge les deux enfants de Madame B., victime de violence domestique, a \nlui-même un enfant et le cas échéant, quelle mesure concrète de soutient son ministère a mise \nen place pour garantir le bien de cette enfant dans ce nouveau cadre familiale ? \nMerci, Madame la présidente. \nMs Navarre-Marie: Madame la présidente, je suis au courant. Selon les informations, \nc’est vrai que l’oncle paternel a un enfant, un adolescent de 16 ans, mais le fait est que l’oncle \na demandé à ce que les enfants lui soient confiés et nous suivons les enfants, les \npsychologues de mon ministère suivent les enfants et nous sommes satisfaits que les enfants \nsont entre de bonnes mains.  \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. L’honorable ministre peut-elle \ninformer la Chambre pendant combien de temps l’oncle paternel pourra assumer seul la prise \nen charge financière de ces deux enfants. Alors qu’aucune aide financière du ministère n’a à \nce jour été accordée ? \nJe vous remercie, Madame la présidente. \nMs Navarre-Marie: Madame la présidente, je ne suis pas en présence d’’une demande \ndans ce sens mais je pense que s’il y a une telle demande, cela aurait dû être adressée au \nministère de la Sécurité sociale. \nMadam Speaker:  On la laisse terminer d’abord. \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Will the hon. Minister inform \nthe House whether her Ministry is envisaging to put in place a clear-cut policy to ensure that \nthe children in general are not separated as to fully protect their well-being and best interest. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMs Navarre-Marie: Madame la présidente, c’est effectivement la politique du \ngouvernement, du ministère, c’est à dire de ne pas séparer les siblings. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nMr Juman: Merci, Madame la présidente. L’honorable ministre peut-elle informer la \nChambre du nombre de visites effectuées par les psychologues de son ministère aux enfants ?  \nMs Navarre-Marie: Il y a eu selon mes informations, Madame la présidente, pas \nmoins de trois visites aux enfants. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, good. Now we go to the hon. First Member for Rodrigues, \nhon. Ms Collet! \nRODRIGUES – BLUE ECONOMY PROMOTION – IMPLEMENTATION \nCHALLENGES – RRA COLLABORATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/191",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 191,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research",
      "question": "(No. B/191) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nTertiary Education, Science and Research whether, in regard to the initiatives being led by his \nMinistry to overcome implementation challenges in the promotion of the blue economy, he \nwill state the benefits for Rodrigues in terms of scientific, technological, innovative and \ncapacity-building initiatives and opportunities for Rodriguan stakeholders in sustainable \nocean resource management, following the recent holding of the Blue Economy Roadmap \nConsultative Workshop, indicating whether any collaboration with the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly in relation thereto is being envisaged.",
      "answer": "Dr. Sukon: Madam Speaker, let me say it from the outset that Rodrigues is not an \nafterthought in our blue economy agenda but rather a priority. Rodrigues, as a partner, is a \nliving laboratory of innovation, resilience and opportunity. \nI wish to inform the hon. Member that the Blue Economy Roadmap Consultative \nWorkshop was held under the purview of the Ministry of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue \nEconomy and Fisheries. My Ministry was not the lead convener for that workshop. However, \nthat does not mean that my Ministry has left Rodrigues aside. Through the Higher Education \nCommission, the Mauritius Research and Innovation Council and the Mauritius Institute of \nBiotechnology Ltd, my Ministry is already supporting Rodrigues through concrete, \nmeasurable and ongoing actions.  \nMadam Speaker, on research investment during the five-year period ending in 2025, the \nMRIC supported 19 research and innovation projects in Rodrigues across blue economy, \nbiodiversity conservation and climate resilience, mobilising approximately Rs14.6 million in \nproject value. That is not only symbolism but investment. These projects include the – \n• \nUnderwater Marine Eco-trail, supporting sustainable marine tourism; \n• \nmarine ecosystem studies by Shoals Rodrigues; \n• \nthe Road Blue Forward Initiative by Polytechnics Mauritius Ltd, and \n• \nscientific work by Ter-Mer Rodriguez on lagoon dynamics and the \nsocioeconomic implications of sand extraction. \nMadam Speaker, on stakeholder partnership, the MRIC has signed an MOU with the \nRodrigues Regional Assembly and operates a dedicated Rodrigues branch anchored on the \nground, close to Rodriguan realities. Through the Assises de la Recherche et de l’innovation \n2.0, conducted jointly with the RRA, five innovation grants, totalling Rs4.99 million have \nbeen awarded with eight further applications currently under review. Rodrigues is not being \nasked simply to receive policy but Rodrigues is being empowered to shape it. On \ninfrastructure, the MRIC is developing the Rodrigues Blue Innovation Hub to support marine \nresearch, seafood value addition, SME development and ecosystem monitoring, building on \nexisting SEMPA facilities and the MRIC branch.  \nAt the scientific frontier, MIBL’s Blue Reef Proposal targets climate resilient coral reef \nrestoration through marine genomics, bioprospecting and local coral nurseries, offering \nRodriguan researchers, fishers and young people hands-on training in cutting edge science. \nOn human capital, 624 Rodriguan students are currently enrolled in our higher education \ninstitution, out of which, 589 in publicly funded institution. They are building the very \nexpertise that will drive Rodrigues’ own blue economy future. \nMadam Speaker, collaboration with Rodrigues Regional Assembly is not only \nenvisaged, it is already happening. It is already producing results and it will be further \nstrengthened because Rodrigues must not stand at the edge of the blue economy but rather be \nat its heart. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, happy? Good! Yes? \nMr François: Madam Speaker, let me just put a supplementary. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Lui il se fait entendre ! Voilà! \nMr François: I thank the hon. Minister for the answer to this pertinent question. Will \nthe hon. Minister confirm whether his Ministry will collaborate with the MRIC to reinforce \nthe suboffice thereat, so that we have many more researchers, many more human resources? \nDr. Sukon: Definitely, as you are aware we had a fire there. So, we are ensuring the \nRodrigues branch of MRIC which will soon become the branch of NRII, will be consolidated \nwith additional officers. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, good. Now, we leave Rodrigues? No, we do not. The hon. \nSecond Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES – LAND DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN AND NATIONAL \nDEVELOPMENT UNIT PROJECTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/192",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 192,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/192) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nNational Infrastructure whether, in regard to the implementation of the Land Drainage Master \nPlan and National Development Unit Projects for Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the Land Drainage Authority has \nawarded a contract to Setec Mauritius in February 2025 for the formulation of a Land \nDrainage Master Plan for Rodrigues, with the view to building climate resilience and reduce \nRodrigues’ vulnerability to flooding, taking into consideration the island’s specific \ntopographical, climatic and developmental context.  \nThe LDMP aims at proposing a conceptual framework for flood risk management that \nwill guide long term sustainable development and reduce Rodrigues’ exposure to the impacts \nof climate change. A kick-off meeting was held on 13 March 2025 and the inception report \nwas presented on 23 July 2025, in the presence of several stakeholders, including – \n• \nmyself; \n• \nthe Deputy Chief Commissioner; \n• \nthe Commissioner for Public Infrastructure; \n• \nthe Commissioner for Agriculture, and  \nrepresentatives from – \n• \nthe National Development Unit; \n• \nLand Drainage Authority; \n• \nthe Road Development Authority; \n• \nthe Rodrigues Public Utilities Commission; \n• \nthe Cadastral Unit of Rodrigues, and  \n• \nSetec amongst others.  \nThe presentation outlined the scope of the LDMP and feedback from the Rodrigues \nRegional Assembly was also sought with the view to ensuring that the deliverables were \naligned with the specific requirements and development vision of Rodrigues. The Inception \nReport was officially handed over to the Chief Commissioner and the Deputy Chief \nCommissioner during the presentation. I am informed by the LDA that the final report is \nexpected to be submitted by June 2026. \nMadam Speaker, as regards the projects being implemented by the National \nDevelopment Unit, a total of three drain projects to the tune of some Rs174 million are \ncurrently ongoing and are at 41% completion. Two projects have been planned for \nimplementation by the NDU in the next financial year, namely – \n(i) \nraising of fords at Rivière Cocos, and \n(ii) \nraising of fords at Baie du Nord. \nIt is expected that the bidding procedures should in principle be completed by October 2026, \nsubject to financial clearance. I am also informed that six projects are under preparation and \nthe study is expected to be completed by June 2027. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Next question, yes, hon. Ms Collet. We still remain in \nRodrigues. \nRODRIGUES – MINISTER OF EDUCATION’S MISSION – FINDINGS & \nOUTCOMES – MEASURES IDENTIFIED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/193",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 193,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/193) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nEducation and Human Resource whether, in regard to his recent mission to Rodrigues, he will \nstate the objectives, findings and outcomes thereof, indicating the measures identified, in \ncollaboration with the Rodrigues Regional Assembly, to strengthen educational performance \nand providing support to the students and their respective families.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, on various occasions, I have highlighted the \nimportance that my Ministry gives to our children in Rodrigues. That is why the specificities \nof Rodrigues are always taken onboard when policies are formulated or when it comes to \nensuring that these policies are implemented satisfactorily. That is why I undertook an official \nvisit to Rodrigues Island from 20 to 24 February 2026 to inter alia take stock of progress \nachieved in the implementation of the Foundation Programme in Literacy, Numeracy and \nSkills. \nMadam Speaker, during my visit, I participated in a round-table discussion organised \nby the Deputy Chief Commissioner of Rodrigues Regional Assembly, and attended by the \nDepartmental Head of Education, Rectors, Deputy Rectors, and Senior Educators of the \nsecondary schools. The deliberations focused on the rationale and philosophy behind the \nFoundation Programme and the importance of setting up of a monitoring committee at school \nlevel to follow-up the teaching and learning aspects of the programme. \nMadam Speaker, during the meeting, I also apprised concerned stakeholders that the \nMauritius Institute of Education (MIE) is presently developing a new elective module, \nnamely Ocean Resources and Fishing for Grade 9 students in Rodrigues. They were also \ninformed of the pathways open to these students after the completion of the National \nFoundation Certificate of Education. In the same context, I proceeded with the launching of \nsome FPLNS workbooks for students of Grade 7 to 9, which have been developed by the \nMIE. \nMadam Speaker, I also took the opportunity of my visit to discuss several critical issues \nconcerning the education sector in Rodrigues with the relevant stakeholders.  \nThese included – \n(i) \nthe possibility of introducing a rotation system for Secondary Educators in \nschools, under the supervision of the Rodrigues Educational Development \nCompany (REDCO); \n(ii) \nthe relocation of the Special Education Needs Resource and Development \nCentre due to its difficult access for students; \n(iii) \nthe planning requirements arising from the increasing demand for courses at the \nMITD. \nMadam Speaker, I also visited the four laureates of the 2025 HSC cohort from \nRodrigues, and their parents, at their respective residences. My Ministry also hosted a \nreception in the honour of the four laureates in Rodrigues itself. This event was attended by \nthe Chief Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner and also, responsible for education, and even \nthe four Members of Parliament, here, hon. François, hon. Ms Collet, hon. Ms Henriette-\nManan, and Mr Léopold. \nMadam Speaker, school visits were also part of my agenda. Unfortunately, due to the \npresence of Cyclone Horacio in the region, a Cyclone Warning Class II was in force, as a \nresult, schools had to close down and the visits had to be cancelled. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Ms Collet, you are happy?  \nLast question is for hon. Second Member for Flacq and Bon Acceuil! \nMIDDLE EAST CRISIS – FOOD SECURITY – LOCAL FOOD PRODUCTION – \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/194",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 194,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/194) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to \nfood security concerns amidst the ongoing crisis in the Middle East, he will state the \nmeasures being implemented to boost local food production, particularly, in terms of \nincreasing self-sufficiency in staple crops, supporting farmers with resources, new \ntechnologies and diversification.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I will reply to PQs B/194, B/201 \nand B/209 together as they relate to the same subject matter. But I will seek the indulgence of \nthe House as the reply is quite lengthy. \nMadam Speaker, during the period 20… \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister, I am sorry. Would it not be possible to communicate \nthe reply? \nDr. Boolell: You want me to circulate it? \nMadam Speaker: Circulate it? No, you do not want. You want to question him? \nAlright! But we do not have much time!  \nDr. Boolell: I cannot, unfortunately, give an abridged version of my reply. Thank you \nvery much. \nDuring the period 2014-2024, the priority of the then regime was land speculation. \nConsequently, there was massive encroachment upon fertile and  \nprime agricultural land. Post COVID-19, food production in Mauritius should have been a \nnational priority. Unfortunately, it was not.  \nOur government is restoring food security as a central pillar of national policy. My \nMinistry has adopted a proactive and a resilient-driven strategy to protect the food supply of \nthe country in the face of global uncertainties. Rs800 million has been allocated to the \nMinistry during the Financial Year 2025-2026 to support farmers, planters, breeders through \nvarious schemes and assistance programmes. These, amongst others, include sheltered \nfarming, purchase of agricultural equipment, installation of CCTV camera, seed subsidies and \nreengineering of accompanying measures. \nThe Ministry organised the Assises de l’Agriculture in January 2026. The report of the \nassises will feed into a food security programme for the year 2026-2029. Discussions during \nthe assises focused on unlocking new resources, identification of new technologies as well as \nhow to achieve diversification to reduce dependency on existing markets. Six strategic \npriorities were, accordingly, identified during the forum – \n(i) \nFood sovereignty and security; \n(ii) \nAgriculture/climate and environment nexus; \n(iii) Environment/plant/animal health; \n(iv) Value chain and youth engagement; \n(v) \nTechnology and innovation, and \n(vi) Good governance and institutional coordination and policy coherence and \nfinancing. \nAs soon as the war situation in Iran unfolded, Madam Speaker, I convened an \nemergency coordination meeting on 03 March 2026 with the relevant technical services and \ninstitutions of my Ministry. The utmost priority is for the achievement of quick wins and \nmaking sure our local produce is readily available for sale, given the numerous uncertainties.  \nIn this context, an action plan has already been prepared by the Ministry regarding \nimmediate actions or low-hanging fruits, medium-term measures and longer strategies that \nwill be considered in view of the conflict in the Middle East or Gulf countries.  \nI, therefore, wish to reassure the House and the public at large that in the immediate \nfuture, there is no shortage of affordable vegetables and staple vegetables like onions, \npotatoes and garlic. There is full supply of fish, poultry meat and eggs from local farms. \nMoreover, increase in quantities of venison meat will be available on a yearly basis.  \nThe Agricultural Marketing Board has already secured additional seed potatoes from \nFrance and Netherlands, which are expected to arrive in May 2026, allowing planting to start \nby early July 2026. This initiative is expected to generate an additional 2,000 tonnes of \npotatoes over and above the estimated 13,000 tonnes normally produced annually.  \nAs at February 2026, the Barkly Experiment Station has a strategic stock of 2 tonnes of \nvegetable seeds of more than 20 different types of vegetables that can be used to plant over \nan area of around 2,300 arpents. These seeds are being sold to planters at a highly subsidised \nprice.  \nBut we have to prepare for the worst and hope for the best. For example, the National \nFarmers Union of UK estimates that the world is about to see the biggest spike in food prices \nsince Russian invasion of Ukraine due to the soaring costs of gas, diesel and fertiliser, and the \ndisruption of shipping routes.  \nAny crisis in the Middle East or Gulf countries sends shockwaves through the global \neconomy. Today’s disruption to the gulf oil supply is already bigger than those of 1970’s. We \nhave to brace ourselves as most oil crises lead to recession.  \nMadam Speaker, my Ministry is actively focusing on the first two strategic priorities, \nthat is, sovereignty, in order to boost local agriculture production along the \nagriculture/climate/environment nexus to address climate change. Hence, an emergency plan \nhas been prepared by the Ministry to be implemented in the short-term. The plan focuses on \nimport substitution policies and optimising production under the present challenges.  \nThese programmes include – \n• \nnew land resources;  \n• \nstrategies to boost production of local staples such as potato, sweet potato, \ncassava, bean fruit; \n• \na precision farming scheme which will allow entrepreneurs to access emerging \ntechnologies such AI-driven precision farming, use of sensors, drones and high-\nyielding seeds. \nMay I remind the House that under the Labour-led government, low-glycemic rice was \ngrown in Cluny and on sale in supermarkets. A Household Food Security Scheme will be \nlaunched to allow backyard farming.  \nI will now elaborate on a number of concrete measures which are being implemented, \nnamely – \n1. \nCreation of an agricultural land bank at my Ministry and mobilisation of land by \nthe State Investment Trust, Rose Belle Sugar Estate and Landscope Mauritius Ltd \nfor the cultivation of potatoes and other strategic crops so as to increase the \nstrategic buffer stocks of essential crops such as potatoes, onions, garlic from six \nweeks to nine weeks. \n2. \nProvisions of grant provided by Food and Agricultural Research and Extension \nInstitute, and Small Farmers Welfare Fund to help farmers to modernise the \nagricultural activities, improve both productivity and adopt locally manufactured \nfertilisers. \n3. \nDistribution to farmers at highly subsidised prices of fast-growing crops such as \nbeans, cowpeas, leafy vegetables, cabbage that can be harvested within two to \nthree months. \n4. \nStrengthening cold chain storage systems and agro-processing capacity for the \ntransformation of key crops in order to reduce post-harvest loses from small \nfarmers and extend the shelf life of agricultural produce. The Ministry is \npresently engaging with private sector operators such as CopeSud and Best Foods \non this issue. \n5. \nDiversification of import sources and procurement arrangement for potatoes, \nonions and garlic to reduce supply risk. \n6. \nMonitoring of prices in consultation with the Ministry of Commerce and \nConsumer Protection and to ensure there is no abusive practices. \n7. \nReliable access to irrigation water and improve agricultural yields by developing \nirrigation schemes through this Irrigation Authority and encouraging farmers to \nexploit boreholes in the fields. \n8. \nImproving the ease of doing agri-business through small planters through one \nstop shop strategy. The Small Farmers Welfare Fund will act as a facilitator. \nMadam Speaker, food security also concerns the availability of meat and livestock \nproducts. In this regard the Division of Veterinary Services of my Ministry has initiated the \ndiversification of import sources for livestock. The Division has explored the possibility of \nimporting parent poultry stock from Kenya and Zambia. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister, may I? We already…time is… \nDr. Boolell: If time is up, I would have circulated. My friend insisted that I should... \nMadam Speaker: How long more do you have? \nDr. Boolell: Well, if time is up, time is up, okay. I would circulate. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, thank you. We won’t be able to have a supplementary. Time is \nup! More than a few minutes anyway.  \nSo, time is up now. Thank you very much, hon. Minister, sorry. \nDr. Boolell: That’s alright. I am used to that now. \nMadam Speaker: It was a very important question. I now have to announce, hon. \nMembers, I have a series of questions that have been withdrawn, of course.  \nSo, now I will list them: B/195, B/196, B/197, B/202, B/204, B/205, B/206, B/207, \nB/208, B/210, B /211, B/212, B/214, B/215, B/216, B/217, B/219, B/220, B/222, B/223, \nB/225, B/228 and B/229. \nThank you very much. \nHon. Members, I want to tell you that if I close my eyes, it’s because of the lights. The \nBroadcasting lights which you don’t get but I get. I will try and get special glasses. \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that all the business on today’s \nOrder Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10. \nMr Mohamed seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nPUBLIC BILLS \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the National Research and Innovation Institute Bill \n(No. IV of 2026) was read a first time. \nMadam Speaker: I think maybe it would be better at this stage that we break for tea \nbecause we don’t want the hon. Minister to start and then we stop her in the middle. It’s much \nbetter.  \nThank you very much. \nAt 4.11 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 4.52 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister. \nSecond Reading \nTHE ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING, COMBATTING THE FINANCING OF \nTERRORISM AND COUNTERING PROLIFERATION FINANCING \n(MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) BILL  \n(No. III of 2026) \nOrder for second reading read. \n(4.52 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning (Dr. Ms J. Jeetun): \nMadam Speaker, I beg to move that The Anti-Money Laundering, Combatting the Financing \nof Terrorism and Countering Proliferation Financing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill ((No. \nIII of 2026) be read a second time. \nMadam Speaker, our financial services sector is at the heart of the Mauritian economy; \ncontributing 12.4% of GDP, employing 20,000 highly skilled professionals directly and many \nmore indirectly, generating 65% of Corporate Tax Revenues and 34% of PAYE revenues. It’s \na source of pride, strength and stability, enabling us to stand tall in the world. \nOur financial services system has not only proved an immense source of prosperity in \nthe past; it is also fundamental to fulfilling our ambitions for the future. So, I stand before this \nHouse to present this important Bill, which brings forward a fully comprehensive and \nforward-looking set of reforms to safeguard the strength, integrity and resilience of our \nfinancial services. And this could not be more timely, more relevant or more necessary.  \nReaffirming our financial standing, reinforcing our credibility and reminding the world \nof our commitment to reform in the face of new incoming financial threats. Showing our \ncommitment to combatting money laundering, the financing of terrorism, and the financing of \nproliferation.  \nMadam Speaker, the world is changing faster than any of us can imagine.  Financial \ncrime is evolving. It’s becoming ever more sophisticated, technologically enabled and cross \nborder. In such an environment, maintaining the status quo is not an option. We must \ncontinuously strengthen our legislative and institutional frameworks to remain ahead of \nemerging risks. \nMadam Speaker, at its simplest, this Bill is about protecting Mauritius from dirty \nmoney and the harm it brings. Money laundering and the financing of terrorism may sound \ntoo technical and daunting to many but these are not distant or abstract concepts. They are \nwhat allow crime, corruption, and illegal networks to survive and grow. When illicit money \nflows unchecked, it does not just affect banks and financial institutions; it distorts our \neconomy, undermines honest businesses, and erodes trust in our institutions. \nFor a country like Mauritius, whose strength lies in its reputation as a clean, well-\nregulated and trusted financial centre, this is not a just technical matter; it is a national \npriority. In an increasingly interconnected world, financial crime is evolving at an \nunprecedented pace. Illicit financial flows can move rapidly across borders, criminal \nnetworks operate with growing sophistication, and new technologies are reshaping the risk \nlandscape. Faced with this, no jurisdiction can afford complacency. It is therefore incumbent \nupon us to ensure that our legal and institutional frameworks remain robust, adaptive and \ncapable of responding effectively to emerging threats. \nMadam Speaker, the global standards in this domain are set by the Financial Action \nTask Force whose recommendations continue to evolve in response to new risks. As part of \nits latest round of Mutual Evaluations, the FATF has introduced significant amendments, \nplacing stronger emphasis on effectiveness, risk-based supervision, transparency, \ninternational cooperation, and critically, the integration of proliferation financing risks. These \ndevelopments signal a clear shift. It is no longer sufficient to have laws in place. We must \ndemonstrate that they actually work in practice. \nMadam Speaker, Mauritius went on the FATF Grey List in February 2020. Whilst we \ncame out of the Grey List in October 2021, I can say that it can leave lasting damage to our \nglobal reputation, so there is no place for complacency. Today, Mauritius stands as a \njurisdiction of substance, fully aligned with international standards. We are compliant with 26 \nout of the 40 FATF recommendations and largely compliant with the remaining 14. This \nreflects the strength, coherence and maturity of our legal, regulatory and institutional \nframeworks but in a world where financial crime is becoming more sophisticated and more \nglobal, standing still is not an option. If we do not keep improving, we fall behind. This Bill \nis therefore about staying ahead, closing gaps, strengthening enforcement, and ensuring that \nour laws keep pace with new emergent risks. \nMadam Speaker, compliance is not the destination; it is the foundation. The focus has \nnow shifted to effectiveness, particularly under the FATF’s Immediate Outcomes. In this \nregard, areas such as supervision, beneficial ownership transparency, financial intelligence, \nand the confiscation of criminal assets remain key priorities for Government. \nIn addition, Madam Speaker, as I said earlier, we are facing threats that are evolving, \ntransnational and technologically enabled. Criminal actors and malign state-backed networks \nexploit opacity, legal ambiguity and delay. They convert illicit proceeds through complex \ncorporate and trust structures. They hide assets behind nominee arrangements. They exploit \nweaknesses in non-profit and cooperative sectors, and benefit from slow or fragmented \ncross-agency responses. And, to meet these challenges, we must modernise our statutory \nframework so that our supervisors, investigators, prosecutors and courts can act swiftly, \neffectively and fairly. \nMadam Speaker, it is precisely within this context that this Bill must be understood. \nFollowing the completion of our Second National Risk Assessment in 2025, Mauritius now \nbenefits from a more refined and up-to-date understanding of the money laundering and \nterrorism financing risks within our jurisdiction. The findings of this assessment have been \ninstrumental in shaping the reforms before this House. \nThis Bill addresses the gaps identified while also aligning our framework with the latest \namendments to the FATF Recommendations. It has been developed through extensive \nconsultations with all competent authorities, regulatory bodies, and key stakeholders, as well \nas, with international and regional partners including the ESAAMLG Secretariat. \nMadam Speaker, the Bill strengthens our risk-based approach by introducing a more \ndynamic and continuous framework for risk identification and mitigation. It enables targeted \nand sector-specific assessments and ensures that critical risk information is disseminated \neffectively across all relevant authorities.  \nA key feature of this Bill is the full integration of proliferation financing risks within \nour legislative framework. It introduces a clear statutory definition, imposes obligations on \nreporting entities to assess and mitigate such risks, and empowers supervisory authorities to \nensure proportionate compliance. \nMadam Speaker, the Bill also significantly enhances our enforcement and asset \nrecovery capabilities. It strengthens the powers of the Financial Crimes Commission. It \nintroduces mechanisms for the temporary suspension of suspicious transactions. It reinforces \nprovisions for the attachment and confiscation of illicit assets. The principle is simple and \nfirm: crime must not pay. \nIn parallel, the Bill advances transparency by strengthening beneficial ownership \nrequirements and enhancing accountability within legal persons and arrangements, including \ntrusts. It also introduces a more refined, risk-based approach to the oversight of non-profit \norganisations, protecting legitimate activities while addressing potential vulnerabilities. \nMadam Speaker, an additional and forward-looking reform contained in this Bill is the \nprovision for the establishment of a centralised information management system. This system \nwill consolidate concise, reliable and timely data from all competent authorities into a single, \ncoordinated platform. The importance of such a mechanism cannot be overstated.  Effective \nsupervision, risk assessment, policy formulation and enforcement all depend on the \navailability of accurate and accessible data. By enabling better data integration, analysis and \nsharing, this measure will significantly enhance our ability to monitor trends, identify risks \nearlier, support evidence-based decision-making and demonstrate effectiveness under \ninternational standards. \nMadam Speaker, the reforms extend further to supervisory and regulatory frameworks. \nThey introduce group-wide supervision, enhance the powers of regulators and strengthen \ncoordination across institutions.  \nThey introduce group wide supervision, enhance the powers of regulators and \nstrengthen coordination across institutions. They also address emergent risk including those \nlinked to virtual assets and new technologies, ensuring that our frameworks remain future \nready. \nEqually, the Bill reinforces both domestic and international corporation through \nimproved information sharing mechanism supported by clear safeguards to ensure \nconfidentiality and proper use. \nMadam Speaker, allow me to introduce the Bill clause by clause, explain what these \namendments seek to achieve and set out the public interest that underpins these changes. I \nkindly ask the indulgence of the House given that we are amending 24 existing legislations.  \nI start with the Bank of Mauritius Act. The amendment in the Bank of Mauritius Act \naims at clarifying the bank’s confidentiality obligation so that where it is necessary to make a \ncomplaint, lodge a report or provide information about a person involved or suspected to be \ninvolved in an offence.  \nSecondly, introducing a transparent administrative sanctions process that requires \nwritten notification of the intended sanction. Thirdly, setting out the grounds and terms. \nFourthly, affording the licensee 21 days right to make written representations where a \nsanction may be imposed. \nBanking Act, including central bank provisions. The Banking Act is being amended in \norder to, firstly, clarify the definition of foreign exchange dealer in order to remove licensing \nand supervision ambiguities.  \nExtend AML/CFT obligations to explicitly encompass proliferation financing and \nensure new products, group programmes and customer due diligence measures reflect this \nobligation. Thirdly, strengthen confidentiality and information sharing provisions to permit \nboth spontaneous and requested exchanges. \nThe Companies Act is being amended to provide a more encompassing UBO definition \nwhich enhances corporate transparency, improves customer due diligence across reporting \nsectors and materially assists law enforcement and regulatory tracing.  \nMadam Speaker, the Co-operatives Act is being amended to empower the Registrar to \nconduct outreach and training on AML/CFT obligations and require co-operative societies \nand credit unions to maintain a register of beneficial owners subject to supervisory access \nwith penalties for non-compliance. \nThe Courts Act is being amended to expand the criteria for referral to the Financial \nCrimes Division to cover offences involving public officials, high profile penetrators, foreign \nnationals or where the offence is grave or complex. Require fair and timely determination of \nmatters by providing for expeditious conduct of proceedings de die in diem, progression after \nplea and adjournments only when it is in the interest of justice.  \nMadam Speaker, the Declaration of Assets Act is being amended to, firstly, permit \nelectronic submission of declarations, broaden definitions, for example, spouse and certain \nassets classes, and strengthen powers to request supporting information and documents. \nSecondly, introduce a narrowly framed voluntary disclosure relief for late filers who come \nforward before an investigation is underway and increase penalties for deliberate non-\ncompliance. \nMadam Speaker, the Environment Act – as environmental crimes can be lucrative and \nmay generate proceeds that feed into broader money laundering schemes, the Environment \nAct is being amended to introduce an offence of ecocide for unlawful and wanton acts that \ncause severe widespread or longer-term environmental damage with proportionate fines and \ncustodial penalties of up to 10 years alongside non-criminal remedies such as restoration, \ncompensation and exclusion from public funding.  \nThe Financial Crimes Commission Act is being amended to address operational gaps, \nimprove clarity and enhance effectiveness. The definition of property of corresponding value \nis being introduced in order to enable recovery where original proceeds of crime cannot be \nlocated, traced, dissipated or held by bona fide third party. This significantly strengthens our \nasset recovery capability in line with international standards.  \nThe amendments also improve coordination between enforcement agencies by \nremoving rigid statutory thresholds for referrals between the Commission and the Police. The \nprovisions relating to unexplained wealth are also strengthened by broadening their scope to \ninclude residents and legal persons, and by introducing more flexible evidentiary mechanism \nto handle complex cases.  \nMadam Speaker, the Financial Intelligence and Anti-Money Laundering Act (FIAMLA) \nis being amended to refine the definition of financial institutions and expand transaction to \ncover professions and gambling and add clear definitions for non-profit organisation, \nproliferation financing and virtual assets and virtual assets service providers. \n Amendments are also being proposed to – \n• require reporting persons to address PF risk; \n• mandate a centralised information management system for AML/CFT/CPF data; \n• introduce consolidated group supervision; \n• improve domestic and international information sharing safeguards, and \n• provide procedural fairness and appeal rights for administrative penalties, \ntighten customer due diligence for existing customers and adjust sectoral \nreporting thresholds. \nThe Financial Reporting Act is being amended to provide explicit powers to the \nMauritius Institute of Professional Accountants to inspect its licensees, enable issuance of \nremedial directions with procedural safeguards and allow compounding of offences with \nappropriate oversight and escalation to law enforcement agencies where compounding is \ndeclined. \nMadam Speaker, the Financial Services Act is being amended to introduce a register of \ndomestic trust and foreign trust having at least one qualified trustee. Clarify that the \nCommission may facilitate or permit foreign counterparts to conduct group level enquiries \nand extend supervisory information, exchange powers with safeguard on dissemination. \n Madam Speaker, the Gambling Regulatory Authority Act, the Income Tax Act and the \nMauritius Revenue Authority Act amendment. The Gambling Regulatory Authority Act, The \nIncome Tax Act and the Mauritius Revenue Authority Act are being amended to require \nbeneficial ownership details at license application stage for gambling operators, introduce \ncash transaction limits and enhance fiscal investigation powers with carefully circumscribed \nsearch and seizure provisions and appropriate safeguards. \nMadam Speaker, the National Payment Systems Act is being amended to clarify \nendorsement and due process by allowing operators, participants and payment service \nproviders to seek judicial review for administrative penalties and actions.  \nThe Real Estate Agent Authority Act is being amended to vest the authority with the \nresponsibility of approving compliance officers in addition to MLROs and deputies, and \nformalising information sharing arrangements with other bodies for the purpose of tightening \nAML/CFT oversight, improve inter-agency co-operation and ensuring that transactional \nactors are properly regulated. \nMadam Speaker, the Registration of Associations Act is being amended to – \n(i) \nempower the Registrar to collect fundraising/financial/programmatic data; \n(ii) \nenable risk-based inspections and information sharing; \n(iii) provide a right of judicial review against administrative sanctions, and  \n(iv) record fundraising/disbursement activity to enhance NPO transparency and TF \nrisk mitigation. \nMadam Speaker, the United Nations (Financial Prohibitions, Arms Embargo and Travel \nBan) Sanctions Act is being amended to provide for – \n(i) \ndefinition of risk to be expanded to cover proliferation and proliferation \nfinancing;  \n(ii) \nand the speeding up of UN sanctions implementation, and strengthen \ncoordination. \n Finally, Madam Speaker, the Value Added Tax Act is being amended to secure \ninteragency cooperation while preserving safeguards. \nMadam Speaker, if these amendments are enacted and effectively implemented, we can \nreasonably expect – \n(i) \nA clear reinforcement in the effectiveness measures to prevent Mauritius being \nused as conduit for illicit finance by closing identifiable legal gaps; \n(ii) \nMore rapid and effective investigations, better preservation of evidence and \ntimely asset recoveries; \n(iii) Greater resilience of our financial sector and strengthened confidence among \ninternational partners and investors; \n(iv) Enhanced transparency and accountability across corporate, cooperative and \npublic office contexts, and \n(v) \nStronger compliance with FATF and related international standards, protecting \nour market access and reputation. \nMadam Speaker, this Bill addresses vulnerabilities identified in our National Risk \nAssessment and in international evaluations. It is urgent because criminal actors do not wait. \nIt is measured because each enhancement is accompanied by safeguards and oversight. Our \ngoal is not to punish legitimate business or hamstring legitimate commerce.  \nOur goal is to deny criminals, the tools to exploit our jurisdiction, to preserve investor \nconfidence, and to protect citizens from the corrosive effects of illicit finance on public \ninstitutions. \nMadam Speaker, the amendments I present today are the product of careful diagnosis of \nreal operational problems and of comparative international practice. They are designed to \nwork together – to make our supervisory regime clearer and more effective, to make \nprosecution and asset recovery practicable, prompt and to ensure our legal framework \nremains responsive to emerging risks such as virtual assets and proliferation financing.  \nAt every stage, we have built in safeguards to protect procedural fairness and individual \nrights. I invite hon. Members of the Assembly to examine each amendment on its own merit, \nto engage constructively with the Bill’s provisions, and to support this endeavour so that \nMauritius remains a safe, credible and resilient financial jurisdiction. One that protects its \ncitizens, honours its international commitments, and attracts legitimate investment and \ncommerce. \nMadam Speaker, we, on our part, we are also investing significantly in capacity \nbuilding to ensure that the successful implementation of the measures that I have just \nelaborated.  \nThrough training programmes, outreach initiatives, and collaboration with international \ninstitutions and development partners, we are ensuring that both the public and private sectors \nremain equipped to respond effectively to evolving risks. This whole-of-system approach is \ncritical to sustaining effectiveness. \n So, Madam Speaker, taken together, these reforms represent a decisive and strategic \nstep forward. They move us beyond technical compliance towards demonstrable \neffectiveness. They strengthen our institutions, enhance transparency, and reinforce our \nability to prevent and combat financial crime in all its forms. Above all, they reaffirm our \ncommitment to maintaining Mauritius as a credible, resilient and internationally respected \nfinancial centre. \nMadam Speaker, the message we send today is clear: Mauritius will not be a weak link \nin the global financial system. We will be a jurisdiction of integrity, of substance, and of \ntrust. \nNow, Madam Speaker, before concluding let me make an important final point. I am \nconscious that whenever we bring forward legislations of this nature, there may be concerns \nfrom the industry. Some will say we are over-regulating. Others will argue that we are acting \nunder external pressure. And some may worry about the burden on businesses. \nComing from the private sector myself, I am very conscious of striking the right \nbalance between compliance and an enabling business environment. Let me address this \ndirectly. First, this Bill is not about over-regulation – it is about smart and targeted regulation. \nIt is about focusing on real risks, not creating unnecessary obstacles for legitimate operators. \nSecond, this is not about doing things for others. It is about acting in our own national \ninterest.  \nA strong AML/CFT framework protects Mauritius – our economy, our jobs, and our \ninternational standing.  \nAnd third, Madam Speaker, this Bill is designed to support – not stifle – genuine \nbusinesses. A clean and credible jurisdiction attracts more investment, lowers risk, and \ncreates long-term opportunities for our people and our businesses. \nSo, Madam Speaker, the choice before us is clear. We can either be reactive – waiting \nfor problems to arise and then scrambling to respond in the future. Or we can take proactive, \ndeliberate and decisive steps to safeguard our health today. This Bill chooses the path of \nresponsibility, credibility and confidence. \nIt takes decisive actions and it sends a clear and strong message. A clear message to \ninvestors – that Mauritius is a strong, safe and secure place to do business. And a clear \nmessage to those who would do our nation harm with dirty money or illegal finance – the \nmessage is – STAY AWAY! You have no place in Mauritius. \n The Mauritian economy is an economy built on integrity, honesty and the rule of law. \nAn economy which is strong, stable and secure.  An economy where legitimate enterprise can \nthrive, not just survive. So, delivering our wealth, our prosperity and an improved quality of \nlife. \nMadam Speaker, with that I, now commend this Bill to the House. \nMr Bhagwan rose and seconded. \n Question put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker:  Thank you. You did very well! \n(5.23 p.m.) \nThe Leader of the Opposition (Mr G. Lesjongard): Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nThis Bill is not merely another piece of legislation as it concerns the very integrity of our \nfinancial system, the reputation of our international financial centre and ultimately, Madam \nSpeaker, the economic security of every citizen of this country. Like the hon. Minister said \nearlier, today we are amending 24 Acts. We are being asked to debate on and vote this Bill in \nvery peculiar circumstances. \nFirst, Madam Speaker, recently the hon. Deputy Prime Minister resigned and made \nsome very serious accusations of corruption against political nominees. And a few days ago, I \nwill have to come back to that, the hon. Minister and therefore a Member of the Cabinet of \nMinisters made more accusations of corruption and this time, stating that the situation is even \nworse than what described the former hon. Deputy Prime Minister, and of course, Madam \nSpeaker… \n(Interruptions) \nThe hon. Prime Minister himself for ten years on still has to explain to our justice \nsystem and the population at large where does his Rs220 billion come from. \n(Interruptions) \nMadame la présidente, on ne peut pas tolérer des accusations pareilles au sein du \nParlement ! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Juman, try and be… He is the Leader of the Opposition. Today, \nhe is the Leader of the Opposition. \n An hon. Member: So, talk about the Bill. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: We do not know! We do not know! Please, carry on! \nMr Lesjongard: Et en plus de cela, Madame la présidente, notre agence de lutte contre \nla corruption, je pense, n’est pas armée convenablement puisque le responsable de cette entité \nne répond pas aux qualifications requises selon la loi. Et lors d’une Private Notice Question, \nj’avais posé une question supplémentaire à l’honorable Premier ministre concernant le \nrenouvellement du contrat du directeur et tout récemment, malheureusement, le Vice-Premier \nministre démissionnaire a confirmé qu’une tactique malsaine avait été utilisée pour le \nreconduire à ce poste. \n(Interruptions) \nMadame la présidente, je n’ai rien contre cette personne. Il a de l’expérience dans le \ndomaine, mais il ne répond pas – une chose est sûre – aux critères établies par la loi. \nMadam Speaker, we agree that this Bill is necessary in order to reinforce our \npreparedness for the next major mutual evaluation by the Eastern and Southern Africa Anti-\nMoney Laundering Group (ESAAMLG) scheduled next year. However, as custodians of the \npublic trust, it is our duty as Members of this House to scrutinise not only the intent but also \nthe substance, the implications and the potential consequences of the legislative framework \nwe are being asked to endorse today. To properly evaluate this Bill, Madam Speaker, it is \nimperative that we recall with honesty and humility the episode that brought this nation to a \nvery critical juncture, our placement on the FATF’s list of jurisdictions under increased \nmonitoring, commonly known as the Grey List in February 2020. \nThe question, Madam Speaker, why was Mauritius grey listed? These are the reasons \npointed by FATF – \n• \na lack of effective risk-based supervision of financial institutions and designated \nnon-financial businesses and professions; \n• \nlimited and timely access to accurate and up to date beneficial ownership \ninformation for legal persons and arrangements; \n• \nan insufficient oversight and monitoring of non-profit organisations to prevent \ntheir misuse for terrorist financing, and lastly, Madam Speaker, \n• \na general ineffectiveness in conducting money laundering investigations and \nprosecutions, particularly those that are complex and transnational in nature. \nThese are the very reasons we were put on the Grey List and the consequences of that \nlisting, Madam Speaker, were immediate and severe. Our reputation as a prudent, compliant \nand well-regulated jurisdiction was tarnished. Correspondent banking relationships came \nunder strain with some international financing institutions applying enhanced due diligence \nor in some cases, derisking by reducing their exposure to Mauritian entities. The cost of \ncompliance for our local financial institutions increased exponentially. Investor confidence, \nthe most fragile of commodities, was shaken. The Grey List was not merely a technical \ndesignation, it was an economic sanction imposed by the market with real impacts on jobs, \ninvestment and growth. \nMadam Speaker, the response of the Government of the day and indeed, of the nation \nas a whole to this challenge was commendable in its urgency and comprehensiveness. A high-\nlevel committee led by the then Prime Minister himself was established to expedite the \nimplementation of the FATF Action Plan. Unfortunately, Madam Speaker, I understand that \nthis committee does not exist to date. The legislative machinery was activated at an \nunprecedented pace. Amendments were brought to the Financial Intelligence and Anti-Money \nLaundering Act, the Companies Act, the Financial Services Act and other relevant \nenactments. The Financial Intelligence Unit was strengthened in terms of resources and \noperational capacity. The Registrar of Companies was empowered to enforce the collection \nand verification of beneficial ownership information. A risk-based supervision framework \nwas developed and rolled out across supervisory authorities, Madam Speaker. Extensive \ntraining and awareness programmes were conducted for reporting institutions, legal \npractitioners, accountants, and other stakeholders. Mauritius also enhanced its international \ncooperation, engaging proactively with the FATF and ESAAMLG and also other partner \njurisdictions.  \nThis concerted effort of Government bore its fruit, Madam Speaker. In October 2021, a \nmere 20 months after being grey listed, the FATF announced the removal of Mauritius from \nits list of jurisdictions under increased monitoring. This was a record time for delisting, a \ntestament to the political will at that time and also to the technical competence and national \nunity that was marshalled to address these deficiencies. It was a victory for Mauritius, a \nvalidation of our commitment to international standards and a restoration of confidence in our \nfinancial system.  \nHowever, Madam Speaker, the removal from the Grey List was not an end point. It was \na milestone on a continuous journey. Compliance is not a destination but a process. Mauritius \nremains under enhanced follow-up by the FATF and is preparing for its third mutual \nevaluation by the ESAAMLG which is scheduled for next year, that is, in 2027. This \nupcoming evaluation will be conducted under the FATF’s revised methodology of 2022 \nwhich places greater emphasis on the effectiveness of the country’s AML/CFT/CPF regime, \nnot merely its technical compliance with the 40 recommendations.  \nIt is against this backdrop, Madam Speaker, that we must examine the Bill before us \ntoday. How does this Bill, that is, the 2026 Bill compare with the legislative framework that \nguided us through the grey listing episode and subsequent delisting? What new elements does \nit introduce, and what are their potential advantages and disadvantages?  \nI wish to draw the attention of this House to specific clauses that warrant detailed \nscrutiny. On a general note, Madam Speaker, I have the impression that some institutions, \nunder this legislation, like the Bank of Mauritius, the MRA, the FCC, the FIU and the FSC, \nare being given wide unchecked powers, under their respective acts, to enable investigatory \nfishing expedition, with an erosion of judicial control on them. \nOn the definition of “beneficial ownership”, and here, I refer to clause 4, where this Bill \nis amending the Companies Act redefining “beneficial owner” to include any natural person \nwho ultimately owns or controls a company or on whose behalf a transaction is conducted. It \nexplicitly includes control through voting rights, debt instruments or positions held within a \nlegal person.  \nSimilarly, Madam Speaker, clause 5 amends the Co-operatives Act to mandate a \nregister of beneficial owners for societies, and clauses 12 and 20 amend the Financial \nServices Act and Trusts Act, respectively, to require detailed registers of trusts, including \nsettlors, protectors and beneficiaries. The advantage here is clear, Madam Speaker. It closes \nthe loopholes that previously allowed opaque structures to hide illicit wealth. It directly \naddresses one of the key deficiencies cited during our grey listing.  \nHowever, the disadvantage lies in the administrative burden. Madam Speaker, the \ndefinition is broad, capturing effective control which can be subjective for legitimate family \noffices or complex investments structures, determining the natural person at the end of the \nchain, can be legally complex. If the guidance is not clear, we run the risk of over-reporting \nor inaccurate reporting, which defeats the purpose of transparency. \nMadam Speaker, furthermore, while clause 12 states that this information shall not be \nmade accessible to the public, the sheer volume of data required to be maintained by trustees \nand service providers increases compliance costs significantly. \nSecondly, Madam Speaker, on asset recovery and confiscation powers. Clause 9 \namends the Financial Crimes Commission Act of 2023, introducing the concept of “property \nof corresponding value”. This allows for confiscation, even if the original proceeds of crime \ncannot be located or have been dissipated or are held by a third party. It also empowers the \nCommission to require financial institutions to provide customer information within 48 hours \nunder Section 68A. \nThe advantage is a robust deterrent. Madam Speaker, criminals often hide assets behind \nnominees or convert them into different forms. This clause ensures that crime does not pay, \neven if the specific cash is gone, Madam Speaker. However, the disadvantage is the potential \nimpact on third party rights. The definition of “property of corresponding value” is wide \nenough to include lawfully acquired property. While there are safeguards, the burden of proof \nshifts significantly, and we must ensure that innocent third parties, who acquire assets in good \nfaith, Madam Speaker, are not inadvertently penalised. \nMadam Speaker, I refer to clause 9, where reference is made to an amendment to be \nbrought to section 56 of the FCC Act. The question is: why was the Independent Police \nComplaints Commission created if now we shall have the Commission investigating on the \npolice and vice versa? \nMadam Speaker, I note that in Section 64 (1) wide powers are being given to the \nFinancial Crimes Commission. I hope that this clause will be used by the FCC judiciously, \nMadam Speaker. \nOn a positive note, Madam Speaker, I note that clause 9, Section 104 introduces for the \nfirst time a Compensation Order, allowing courts to compensate persons who suffer loss due \nto serious default or gross negligence by commission officers. This, Madam Speaker, is a \ncrucial safeguard that was lacking in previous legislation, and must be highlighted as a \nsignificant improvement in balancing enforcement powers with individual rights. \nLet me, now, refer to clause 68A which concerns power to require information for asset \nrecovery investigations. We understand that now, through this Bill, by a simple notice which \ncan be sent by electronic means, that is, an e-mail, the FCC can obtain customer information \nfrom financial institutions as compared to a judge’s order. Madam Speaker, this is very \ndangerous! \nThirdly, on operational efficiency and FIU powers, clause 10 amends the Financial \nIntelligence and Anti-Money Laundering Act. It introduces section 10A, allowing the FIU to \norder a temporary suspension of a suspicious transaction for up to 72 hours and can be \nextended by a judge.  \nIt also establishes, Madam Speaker – and the hon. Minister earlier mentioned that – a \nCentralised Information Management System, which is under Section 19EA of the Bill. Now, \nwith regard to the administration and management of the system, it is stated that “The \nMinistry shall”. May we be informed which Ministry are we referring to? I believe it is the \nMinistry responsible for the subject of money laundering. Is it the Ministry of Finance? \nMadam Speaker, in the past, by the time the FIU analysed a report and law enforcement \nacted, funds had often moved offshore. A 72-hour freeze allows time for investigation. \nDefinitely, the CIMS will improve data sharing between competent authorities, addressing \nthe silos issue often cited by evaluators. However, the disadvantage is the risk to legitimate \ncommerce. A 72-hour suspension, if used frequently and without precise intelligence, can \ndisrupt legitimate business transactions, damage commercial relationships and expose \nreporting institutions to liability from their clients. \nThe clause mandates non-disclosure of the suspension order, which is necessary for \ninvestigation but adds to the compliance, complexity for banks who must manage client \nexpectations without revealing regulatory actions. \nFourthly, Madam Speaker, on judicial efficiency clause 6 amends the Courts Act \ninserting section 41AA and section 80E, mandating that criminal proceedings before the \nFinancial Crimes Division be conducted expeditiously de die in diem, once a plea is entered \nwith strict requirements for granting adjournments. The advantage is undeniable and we do \nwelcome this amendment. One of the criticisms during the grey listing period was the length \nof time taken to prosecute financial crimes. Delays often led to evidence degradation or \nwitness attrition and as we say: justice delayed is justice denied, Madam Speaker. \n(Interruptions) \nThis clause forces a timeline on the judiciary…  \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker, I cannot make my speech if somebody is barking behind me. \n(Interruptions) \nMs Anquetil: Come on! Come on! \nMr Lesjongard: This has happened too often, Madam Speaker! \nMadam Speaker: I know! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Assirvaden : Il doit retirer ! Il doit retirer ces mots-là ! \nMadam Speaker: Mr Jhummun, please! \nAn hon. Member: Withdraw! \nMadam Speaker: Both of you… \n(Interruptions) \nMembers… \n(Interruptions) \nBoth of you…  \n(Interruptions) \nMr Jhummun, please… \nMr Jhummun: I did not say anything. \nMadam Speaker: You didn’t say anything? \nMr Jhummun: I did not say! \nMadam Speaker: I am asking you to say that… \nMr Jhummun: Ce n’est pas moi ! \nMadam Speaker: Ce n’est pas vous ? \nMr Assirvaden: C’est un chien ! \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard: S’il se prend pour un chien qu’est-ce que je peux faire ? \nMadam Speaker: Non, alors là ça ne va pas ! No, hon. Minister … \nMr Assirvaden: Cheap barking… \nMadam Speaker: Tout marchait très bien là et l’honorable Jhummun fait comme si je \nsuis sourde ! Bien sûr, je l’ai entendu ! \nMr Jhummun: Ce n’est pas moi, Madame ! \nMs Anquetil : Mais il n’aboie pas, Madame. \nMadam Speaker: Vous, vous n’avez pas dit les mots qu’il ne fallait pas mais \nvous l’avait interrompu ! \nAn hon. Member : Il a dit qu’il faut le mettre en prison le plus vite possible ! \nMadam Speaker: Qu’est-ce-que je vais faire ? \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Retire le mot ‘barking’! \nMr Lesjongard: No, I am willing but he should withdraw! But he should stop the way \nhe is behaving… \nMadam Speaker: I have told you in the past! \nMr Lesjongard: No, I don’t think so! \nMadam Speaker: Yes, I have told you in the past, Mr Jhummun! \nMr Jhummun: But this time it was not me, Madam! \nMadam Speaker: It was not you! \n(Interruptions) \nEverybody knows it was you! \nHon. Leader of the Opposition, just carry on! I won’t ask him anything because \neverybody is not being honest! Please! \nMr Lesjongard: Then I won’t withdraw what I said! \nMadam Speaker: No, just terminez votre discours!  \nAn hon. Member: Terminez! Terminez! \nMadam Speaker: And he was actually on a good… autant que j’ai pu comprendre. Il \nfélicitait… \nMr Assirvaden: The word ‘barking’, he can use barking in the … \nMadam Speaker: No, you cannot! \nMr Lesjongard: Yes, but nobody uttered that! \nMadam Speaker, it is said in a sense that nobody… \nMadam Speaker: Okay, je perds patience. J’en ai marre ! Je lève la séance ! \nVous n’avez pas compris ce qui se passe-là ? Soit, vous me laisser tranquille, nous \nsavons très bien qu’il y a eu deux fautes. On reste tranquille ! On continue ou je lève la \nséance ? À vous de voir ! \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Be a gentleman! \nMadam Speaker: Ça suffit! \nMr Lesjongard: No, if he agrees he has said what he said earlier, interrupting me, then \nI am willing to withdraw otherwise I won’t withdraw. If nobody said… \nMadam Speaker : Non, mais… \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard : Ce n’est pas lui ? \nMadam Speaker: Alors, si ce n’est pas lui, celui qui a dit ça doit me dire qui c’est. On \nva voir qui s’est ? \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: Pran kredi la tomem ! Ale Babajee, pran kredi la tomem ! \nMadam Speaker: Mais c’est ce que je dis. Franchement, soit M. Jhummun pense que \nje suis totalement à l’ouest et il me fait croire, tout le monde sait que c’est lui ! \nMr Etwareea: Madame la présidente, pour trouver un compromis, je prends la \nresponsabilité de ce qui s’est passé. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Okay! \nMr Lesjongard: I withdraw what I said, Madam Speaker! \nMadam Speaker: De toute manière… \nMr Lesjongard: Let me come back to my speech, Madam Speaker… \nMadam Speaker: Please, withdraw that word! \nMr Lesjongard: I said I withdraw, Madam Speaker! \nMadam Speaker: Oh, you withdraw, I didn’t hear! Because everybody is shouting! De \ntoute manière, cet après-midi je vais aller regarder, nous avons enregistré, je vais aller \nregarder cet après-midi. Mais vous avez retiré le mot, c’est très bien. Franchement, il est déjà \n17h50. \nMr Lesjongard: Madam Speaker, I was talking… \nMadam Speaker: Yes, take it in … \nMr Lesjongard:… about de die in diem concept and I was saying that this clause \nforces a timeline on the judiciary and the parties concerned. However, the disadvantage is the \npotential pressure on the justice system. Complex financial crimes involved voluminous \ndocuments and expert witnesses. We also know that considerable logistic is required if we \nhave a certain number of cases being dealt with concurrently. Therefore, Madam Speaker, my \nquestion to the hon. Minister is – whether the judiciary was consulted in the drafting of this \nsection.  \nMadam Speaker, forcing de die in diem trial without adequate preparation time could \ncompromise the quality of justice or lead to appeals based on unfair trial conditions. We must \nensure the Judiciary is resourced adequately to handle this accelerated pace, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: I hope everybody, I think it’s the Latin that got everybody like very \nodd, the de die in diem thing. We are used to this. Aren’t we Attorney-General? \nMr Lesjongard: Fair play, Madam Speaker… \nMadam Speaker: Allez-y! \nMr Lesjongard: On novel offences, clause 8 amends the Environment Act 2024, \nintroducing for the first time the offence of ecocide with penalties up to ten years of penal \nservitude. \nMadam Speaker, may the House be informed as to why this clause has been introduced \nin this Bill. I sincerely think that this amendment has nothing to do with AML/CFT and I \nthink maybe… \nMr Etwareea: Bizin lir impe!  \nMr Lesjongard: … this has been put in this Bill to please the Party in Government. \nMadam Speaker, the disadvantage is the enforceability of ecocide which is a very \ncomplex concept involving scientific evidence of severe, widespread or long-term damage. \nProsecuting this requires specialised experts that our current law enforcement may lack, \nMadam Speaker. \nClause 7 amends the Declaration of Assets Act expanding the definition of work of art \nto include digital arts and collectables and increase in penalties for non-declaration. The \nadvantage is that it expands the scope of predicate offences for money laundering. \nToutefois, on est en droit de poser la question, Madame la présidente, est-ce qu'on a à \nMaurice les évaluateurs d'objets d'art, de tableaux etc. \nMadam Speaker, valuing digital arts for asset declaration is highly subjective and may \nlead to disputes between declarants and the Commission.  \nFinally, Madam Speaker, I must address the safeguards regarding administrative \npenalties. Clause 2 amends the Bank of Mauritius Act requiring the Bank to notify financial \ninstitutions of its intention to impose penalties and granting them 21 days to make written \nrepresentation before the penalties imposed. This is a vital addition. In the previous regime, \nthere were concerns about the immediacy of sanctions without adequate recourse. This clause \nintroduces a layer of due process that protects institutions from arbitrary regulatory action. It \nis a disadvantage only in the sense that it may slightly delay the imposition of sanctions but it \nis a necessary trade-off for fairness and legal certainty.  \nMadam Speaker, I must now address the elephant in the room. The prospect of \nMauritius being grey listed, again, following ESAAMLG Mutual Evaluation schedule in \n2027 is in front of us. Et je ne suis pas en train de crier au loup comme certains.  \nMr Etwareea : Prophète de malheur. \nMr Lesjongard: The Comsure Group notes that Mauritius is currently undergoing \nongoing enhanced follow-up and the 2027 assessment will evaluate both technical \ncompliance and effectiveness across 11 immediate outcomes with a more prominent focus on \ncounterproliferation financing. The Platform Africa Report highlights that this evaluation will \nbe conducted under FATF’S revised 2022 methodology which is more rigorous and outcome-\nfocused.  \nWhat are the present possibilities of a relisting Madam Speaker? The risk is not \nnegligible. The FATF and ESAAMLG will be looking for evidence that our laws are not just \non paper but are effectively implemented and enforced. They will assess whether our \nfinancial institutions are truly applying risk-based supervision, whether our authorities are \nsuccessfully investigating and persecuting complex money laundering cases and whether our \nbeneficial ownership information is accurate, timely and accessible.  \nThe inclusion of CPF as a core component of this Bill, is a proactive step in this regard. \nHowever, legislation alone is insufficient. The effectiveness of this Bill, Madam Speaker, will \ndepend entirely on its implementation – the training of officers, the allocation of resources, \nthe coordination between agencies and the culture of compliance within the private sector.  \nIf today we pass this Bill, but fail to adequately resource the FIU, the Financial Crimes \nCommission, the police and the supervisory authorities, we risk creating a façade of \ncompliance that will not withstand the scrutiny of and on site ESAAMLG evaluation in 2027. \nConversely, if we pass this Bill and couple it with a sustained well-funded and coordinated \nimplementations strategy, we cannot only avoid relisting but position Mauritius as a regional \nleader in financial integrity. Madam Speaker, time will tell whether we have succeeded. \n In conclusion, Madam Speaker, this Bill represents a necessary and timely evolution of \nour legal framework. However, we must legislate with our eyes wide open. The \ndisadvantages, the increased compliance burden, the risk of regulatory overreach, the \npotential impact on business cost and privacy are real and must be mitigated through careful \ndrafting, clear guidelines and ongoing dialogue with all stakeholders. Most importantly, \nMadam Speaker, we must recognise that this Bill is not a silver bullet. Its success will be \ndetermined not in this House but in the offices of regulators, the courtrooms of our judiciary \nand the compliance department of our financial institutions.  \nWhen we vote for this piece of legislation today, Madam Speaker, let us do so with the \nsolemn pledge to implement it with wisdom, proportionality and an unwavering commitment \nto both security and justice. For, in safeguarding our financial system Madam Speaker, we \nare safeguarding the prosperity and dignity of every citizen in this country.  \nI am done, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, very much.  \nYes, hon. Minister of Labour.  \n(5.59 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations (Mr R. Uteem): Madame la \nprésidente, j’allais commencer mon discours en regrettant l’absence de l’ancien Deputy \nPrime Minister, qui avait parlé longuement sur les risques d’un downgrade de Grey listing de \nMaurice sur la liste de GAFI mais en écoutant l’honorable leader de l’Opposition, je vois \nqu’il y a eu beaucoup de concertation parce qu’en l’entendant, je croyais croire que c’était \nl’ancien Deputy Prime Minister qui était en train de parler. Et ce n’est pas une coïncidence \nparce que ce matin aussi, lors du PNQ, c’était ex DPM, ex DPM, ex DPM comme-ci \nl’alliance a déjà été conclue entre l’ex DPM et le MSM.  \n(Interruptions) \nLe leader de l’Opposition a commencé son discours en faisant référence au Financial \nCrimes Commission et la lutte contre la corruption. Excusez-moi, Monsieur le leader de \nl’Opposition, vous êtres très mal placé pour venir parler de lutte contre la corruption. Mais ce \nqui est de votre commentaire sur le Directeur Général, je vais reprendre ce que l’honorable \nPremier ministre avait dit en réponse à vote PNQ.  \nLe Directeur Général présent, intérimaire du Financial Crimes Commission a été \nnommé selon les procédures établies par la loi, dans un premier temps, pour neuf mois et \ndans un deuxième temps, pour une deuxième période de neuf mois. Pourquoi ? Parce que le \ngouvernement est en train de préparer une nouvelle loi – le Financial Crimes Agency qui va \nabsorber le Financial Crimes Commission. Donc, ce n’est pas la peine maintenant de nommer \nquelqu’un à la tête de la Financial Crimes Commission si dans quelques semaines, quelques \nmois, on aura à nommer quelqu’un d’autre à la tête du Financial Crimes Agency. \nMais ceci dit, le gouvernement a déjà pris les mesures nécessaires pour amender la loi, \nle Financial Crimes Commission, pour renforcir les pouvoirs du Director of Public \nProsecution pour qu’il n’y ait plus des cover-up, pour qu’on ne puisse plus ranger les cas de \ncorruption dans les tiroirs. On a aussi amendé la loi pour permettre à la police et cela, en \nréponse à une des critiques de GAFI. On a permis à la police de faire des enquêtes parallèles \ndans des cas de fraudes, dans des cas de blanchiment d’argent.  \nMadame la présidente, le leader de l’Opposition et c’est bon qu’il nous ait parlé de l’ile \nMaurice s’étant retrouvé sur la liste grise en 2020, mais il choisit de ne pas dire pourquoi. \nMoi je vous dis pourquoi. Monsieur le leader de l’Opposition, c’est parce que vous étiez dans \nce gouvernement.  \nMadam Speaker : Adressez-vous …    \nMr Uteem : Vous vous souvenez, Madame la présidente, de cas de Alvaro Sobrinho ? \nJean-Claude Bastos de Morais, Quantum Global, Dos Santos, le Angola Sovereign Fund.  \nAn hon. Member: Mémoire courte.  \nMr Uteem : Démantèlement de la BAI, ingérence du gouvernement dans les enquêtes. \nC’est la raison pour laquelle qu’on s’est retrouvé sur la liste grise en 2020. Heureusement \nqu’il y a eu Covid et on n’a pas eu à avoir tout l’entendu de l’impact d’être sur la liste grise. \nAujourd’hui le leader de l’Opposition nous dit qu’il n’y a plus de comités présidés par le \nPremier ministre comme c’était le cas sous le régime précédent. Mais je suis sûr qu’il doit lire \nle compte rendu des décisions du cabinet. \nLe 7 novembre 2025, le cabinet a pris note de la composition d’un comité \ninterministériel sur l’anti-money laundering, combatting the financing of terrorism and \ncombatting proliferation of financing, qui est coprésidé par la ministre du Service financier et \nl’honorable Attorney General et dont fait partie pas moins de six ministres de ce \ngouvernement et 16 représentants des competent authorities. Je parle, par exemple, de la \nBanque de Maurice, de la Financial Services Commission, du Registrar of Companies, the \nRegistrar of Association and the Registrar of Corporatives. Seize ! Dont la Financial \nIntelligence Unit. \nEt c’est ce comité, Madame la présidente, qui, aujourd’hui, a accouché du projet de loi \nque vous avez. C’est un travail d’équipe, bien sûr, présidé par les deux coprésidents, Madame \nla ministre du Secteur financier et l’honorable Attorney General. Mais tous les ministres et \nles competent authorities ont eu l’occasion de faire des commentaires sur ce projet de loi. \nDonc, c’est un projet de loi qui fait l’unanimité parmi les law enforcement agencies.  \nEt oui, on espère qu’avec ce projet de loi, on va pouvoir répondre aux attentes du \nGAFI, l’année prochaine, en 2027, à travers l’ESAAMLG, qui va à nouveau nous passer en \nexamen. Mais qu’est-ce qui s’est passé, Madame la présidente, depuis 2020 à aujourd’hui ? \nL’honorable leader de l’opposition a raison de souligner le risque qu’on se retrouve sur la \nliste grise. Pourquoi ? À qui la faute ? \nPeut-être que l’honorable leader de l’opposition oublie le fameux homme d’affaires : \nMamy Ravatomanga, pendant dix ans sous le gouvernement MSM ! \nMr Assirvaden: 7.3 milliards ! \nMr Uteem: 7.3 milliards ! Ce monsieur a pu circuler librement à travers des sociétés \nécrans à Maurice. Donc, qui était responsable de cela ?  \nL’autre cas : Banyan Tree Bank, la Silver Bank. Hier même, Madame la présidente, on a \nreçu un communiqué de la Banque centrale, qui a remplacé le conservateur par un receiver.  \nMais Banyan Tree, en 2020, avait premièrement forcé la Banque de Maurice de \nnommer un conservateur. Il avait gelé tous les comptes. Tous les comptes étaient gelés. Et \nqu’est-ce qui s’est passé après ? La Banque centrale, sous l’ancien régime, dont le gouverneur \ngénéral est sous un mandat d’arrêt aujourd’hui, et l’ancien ministre des Finances est aussi \nsous un mandat d’arrêt, qu’ont-ils fait ? Ils ont agréé à un transfert d’actions entre les \nactionnaires de Banyan Tree aux nouveaux actionnaires de la Silver Bank. Et puis, ils ont fait \npression sur des agences gouvernementales pour qu’elles gardent leurs dépôts avec la Silver \nBank. Ils ont fait pression sur la municipalité de Port Louis et sur la municipalité de Curepipe \npour qu’elles renouvellent leurs dépôts avec la Silver Bank. \nJe sais de quoi je parle parce que j’étais le président du Public Accounts Committee et \non avait fait remarquer dans notre rapport; ils l’ont dit : « Ils ont reçu la pression, des \ninstructions, venant du ministère des Finances, de renouveler leurs dépôts avec la Silver \nBank. » Alors que ce même ministère des Finances avait dit dans une circulaire que n’importe \nquel corps paraétatique et municipalité qui a un excédent d’argent devait investir dans des \nbons du Trésor. \nAu final, dans une réponse à une PQ, l’honorable Premier ministre, c’était en date du 2 \ndécembre 2025, a annoncé à la Chambre qu’un montant de R 3.35 milliards, appartenant à \ndes government related entities, a été placé dans la Silver Bank sous leur gouvernement. \nMr Ameer Meea: Padayachy! \nMr Uteem: Après, aujourd’hui, il vient dire que Maurice risque d’être sur la liste \ngrise ! On risque d’être sur la liste grise ? À cause de vous et de votre gouvernement \nprécédent ! \nHon. Members: Shame ! \nMr Assirvaden: Ar sa pou al fer lalians la ein! \nMr Uteem: Madame la présidente, j’ai un petit peu souri lorsque le leader de \nl’opposition nous a demandé pourquoi on est en train d’introduire une nouvelle disposition \nd’écocide. Il va même plus loin pour dire que si on le fait, c’est sous la pression d’un de nos \npartenaires au gouvernement. \nSi le leader de l’opposition avait pris la peine de consulter le GAFI/FATF, les experts, il \naurait su que depuis 2012 – je ne parle pas depuis 2025, quand on a pris le pouvoir –, depuis \n13 ans, le GAFI n’arrête pas de tirer la sonnette d’alarme concernant les crimes contre \nl’environnement, qui sont devenus un racket international. Je parle de deforestation. Je parle \nde trafic d’ivoire et du trafic des animaux protégés.  \nMs Anquetil: Bois de rose ! \nMr Uteem: Je parle justement du trafic de bois de rose. \nMs Anquetil: Bois de rose ! J’avais posé la question ! \nMr Uteem: Du trafic des bois de santal qui, aujourd’hui, selon le GAFI, je cite FATF \nde son website – \n“Environmental crime is one of the most profitable criminal enterprises, generating \naround USD 110 to 281 billion in criminal gains each year. It covers a wide range of \nunlawful activities such as illegal logging, illegal wildlife trade and waste trafficking.” \nMais à Maurice, ce n’est pas un crime ! C’est ça le problème. Sous le précédent régime, \nils n’ont jamais légiféré pour qu’il y ait un crime contre l’environnement. Et puis, ils se disent \nêtre des grands défenseurs, des grands écolos, un parti vert ! Depuis 2012, le GAFI vous dit \nqu’il faut légiférer pour avoir un environmental crime. C’est ce que nous sommes en train de \nfaire aujourd’hui ! Ecocide ! \nAujourd’hui, quand on passe une loi pour venir dire que toute infraction sera punie d’un \npenal servitude de dix ans, automatiquement, cela devient un crime. Pourquoi est-ce \nimportant que ce soit un crime ? Parce que sous la Financial Intelligence Crime, quand on est \nen train de combattre le blanchiment d’argent, la définition, c’est ‘proceeds of a crime.’  \nDonc, auparavant, toutes les infractions sous l’Environment Act n’étaient pas des \ncrimes. Maintenant, avec cette loi, on aura un crime. Maintenant avec cette loi, on aura \nblanchiment d’argent pour tout ce qui est en train de tuer mère nature. Voilà, M. le leader de \nl’opposition, si vous aviez fait votre homework, vous auriez su pourquoi on a mis cette \ndisposition dans notre loi. \nMadame la présidente, le leader de l’opposition a aussi fait une remarque par rapport à \ntoutes ces nouvelles provisions qu’on a dans cette loi : « que le business sera encore plus \ndifficile. »  Il le dit : « Il faudra collecter toutes les informations, les partager. Ça prend du \ntemps. Ça prend de l’argent. »  \nMais, Madame la présidente, la réputation de Maurice n’a pas de prix ! \nAn hon. Member: Exactement ! \nMr Uteem: Eux, ils ont grandi, ils ont régné dans l’opacité. Nous, on change. On règne \ndans la transparence. C’est ça la différence ! \nMs Anquetil: Tu as compris, Joe ? \n(Interruptions) \nMr Lesjongard : …zot tou seki… \nMr Uteem: Si c’est un coût d’opération, si effectivement il y a un compliance cost, \nmais… \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker : Chut ! \nMr Uteem: Mais les bénéfices qui décolleront dans notre secteur financier comme un \ncentre financier crédible international reconnu va excéder tout le risque d’augmentation du \ncoût. \nAutre chose, et là j’étais vraiment très surpris, c’est le commentaire de l’honorable \nleader de l’Opposition concernant la justice. Vous savez, Madame la présidente, on veut être \nune juridiction crédible. Donc, on vient avec une loi pour que tous les cas de Financial Crime \nsoient disposés le plus rapidement possible tout en respectant le droit des accusés. \nDonc, on est en train d’introduire le concept du procès continuel – tous les jours. \nMadam Speaker: De die in diem. \nMr Uteem : C’est cela le fameux de die in diem. Mais ce n’est pas un nouveau, on l’a \ndéjà en ce qui concerne les assises. Donc, simplement, maintenant on va appliquer le même \nraisonnement pour les financial crimes. D’autant plus que très souvent dans les financial \ncrimes, on a des témoins qui sortent de l’étranger pour venir à Maurice parce que les crimes \nde blanchiment d’argent international, il y a la coopération de différent pays. Et on a su, \nquand il y avait, par exemple, le cas Boskalis, comment c’était difficile parce qu’à chaque \nfois M. Maunthrooa renvoyait le procès. \nDonc là, on introduit des mesures pour justement terminer au plus vite possible. Mais la \nremarque du l’honorable leader de l’Opposition qui me dérange, c’est qu’il est en train de \nsuggérer qu’on puisse, nous, donner des directives au Chef Juge, au Juge. On ne peut pas le \nfaire. \nMr Lesjongard: Je n’ai jamais dit ça, Madame la présidente. \nMr Uteem : Non, suggérer qu’on est entre de mettre pression sur le Judiciaire. On ne ... \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Non, ce qu’il a dit, c’est est ce que le Judiciaire a été consulté. Nous \nsavons qu’il y a la séparation des pouvoirs. Allez-y !  \nMr Uteem : Le Judiciaire, je peux vous donner la garantie, et au l’honorable leader de \nl’Opposition, le Judiciaire va demeurer indépendant et il n’y aura aucune ingérence de notre \ngouvernement et jamais, au grand jamais, vous allez entendre l’honorable Premier ministre \nou n’importe quel ministre de ce gouvernement venir critiquer la décision d’une magistrate \ncomme l’ancien Premier ministre l’a fait. \n(Interruptions) \nMr Uteem : Mais c’est vrai ! L’honorable leader de l’Opposition a la mémoire courte. \nMadame la présidente, brièvement je vais parler du deux aspects de ce texte de loi qui, un, \nsuscite quelques controverses et c’est les provisions concernant le Trust – l’honorable leader \nde l’Opposition a fait référence au Trust. \nMadame la présidente, j’ai eu la chance de faire partie du steering committee en 2000, \nqui était venu avec le Financial Services Commission et j’étais dans l’équipe qui a rédigé le \nTrusts Act. Je me souviens très bien que 25 ans de cela, il avait une forte pression pour garder \nde la confidentialité autours… \n(Interruptions) \nMr Uteem : Il doit report to the ex-Deputy Prime Minister. \nAn hon. Member: Asiz zot! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Pas de Jacques Brel là ! Pas de Jacques Brel ! \nMr Uteem : Donc, quand on était dans ce comité, c’était très important de préserver la \nconfidentialité des informations concernant les Trusts et c’est pourquoi vous allez voir, je \ncrois, de mémoire, que c’est à la Section 23 du Trusts Act qu’il faut passer par un ordre de la \nCour Suprême pour avoir des informations concernant l’identité du settlor, des bénéficiaires \net l’administration du Trust.  \nMais, cela c’était 25 ans de cela – depuis, les choses ont évolué. Même l’Angleterre, où \ndans un cas – je suis sûr que quand vous étiez à l’université, vous avez entendu des secrets \ntrusts, half secrets trusts. Donc, cela n’existait même pas les Trusts. Il n’y avait aucune \nobligation de venir déclarer des trusts, encore moins de les enregistrer mais aujourd’hui \nmême en Angleterre, il y a une obligation d’enregistrer la plupart des express trusts avec Her \nMajesty's Revenue and Customs Service. \nDonc, les choses évoluent et nous, à l’île Maurice aussi, on a du modifié nos lois pour \ncréer ce registre de Trusts qui sera avec le FSC mais on a essayé de préserver la balance entre \nla nécessité de bien réglementer le secteur mais aussi préserver la confidentialité et donc ce \nn’est pas tout le monde qui aura accès à ces données. Ce n’est que la Financial Services \nCommission et les autres regulated entities, par exemple, les banques qui ont besoin d’avoir \ndes informations sur les Trusts. Donc, on est en train de ménager les deux.  \nEt puis, finalement, Madame la présidente, un mot sur le secteur qui concerne mon \nministère, le Registrar of Association. Le Registrar of Association qui est concerné par la \nrecommandation 8 on Preventing terrorism financing in non-profit organisations.  \nDonc, le GAFI a souligné que les institutions charitables et les sociétés, les associations \nqui tombent sous mon ministère ont un risque d’être utilisés abusivement. \nMadam Speaker: Manipulés. \nMr Uteem : Manipulés, pour le financement des activités terroristes. Notamment, il y a \ntout un scandale avec le financement d’Al Qaïda dans le passé. C’est pourquoi, aujourd’hui, \non fait des amendements, on apporte des amendements au Registration of Associations Act \npour assurer que toutes les associations qui sont à risque fassent un risk based asssessment et \nprennent les mesures nécessaires. En même temps, les officiers de mon ministère vont faire \ndes inspections et s’assurer que les associations à Maurice, surtout les associations caritatives, \nreligieuses ne sont pas manipulées et utilisées. \nEn même temps, on a profité pour enlever une provision qui était assez archaïque qui \npermettait au ministre de décider si une association qui n’était pas en conformité avec la loi \npouvait continuer à exister. Ce n’était pas le cas, par exemple, pour les compagnies. Pour les \ncompagnies, si vous n’êtes pas compliant, the Registrar of Companies vous deregister. Mais \npar contre pour les associations, le Registrar of Associations n’avait pas ce pouvoir, c’était le \nministre de tutelle. La conséquence, il y a plusieurs milliers d’associations qui ne sont pas \ncompliant à Maurice et qui existent toujours. \nDonc, avec cet amendement, on retire ce pouvoir subjectif de la main des politiciens et \non les met dans la main du régulateur, le Registrar of Associations. Donc, je vais conclure, \nMadame la présidente, en félicitant ma collègue pour cette excellente loi et j’espère que, \nmaintenant, avec cette loi on va passer facilement le technical assessment. Maintenant, on va \ns’assurer au niveau des Law Enforcement Agencies qu’on passe aussi l’examen \nd’effectiveness. Merci. \nMadam Speaker: L’honorable Rookny, c’est à vous! \n(6.22 p.m.) \nMr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet): Madam Speaker, let \nme put the introduction of this Bill in the current context. We are a small island of 1.2 million \nwithout much natural resources and our main assets being our human capital. \nOur financial sector contributes around 12% our GDP and employs tens of thousands of \npeople directly and indirectly which we need to protect as much as we can. Prior to 2014, we \nwere really a jurisdiction of choice for many financial activities but since then, by a sheer \nincompetence of the Jugnauth government, we lost a battle and allowed our DTA with India, \nwith South Africa to be renegotiated against our interests and other DTAs were just \nterminated. \nI cannot quantify enough the negative impact this has had on our sector. This   has \ncontributed in chasing away major international banks like the Deutsche Bank from our \nfinancial landscape whilst others have aborted their venture here. \nTo make matters worse, comme mes amis avant moi l’ont archi dit, in 2020, the FATF \nplaced us on its grey list. The trust that we had built over the years of constant hard work took \na serious blow. It is very pertinent to ask whether we are still considered as a credible \nfinancial hub. We all remember 2020 when Mauritius was placed on the FATF Grey List. \nCorrespondent banking relationships came under strain, transaction costs grew, the \nreputational cost was immediate and measurable. Investors asked hard questions, some \nwalked away.  \nCe n’est pas une question abstraite, Madame la présidente. Quand la réputation \nfinancière d’un pays est entachée, c’est le citoyen ordinaire qui en paye le prix, pas \nseulement les grandes institutions. We came off that list but a country that has been grey \nlisted once, carries a scar. This Bill is in part digressing on that scar. For that reason alone, it \ndeserves to pass. Be it as it may, we are rebuilding and we need to reengineer. However, let us \nbe honest, we are dutybound to introduce this legislation. This is an FATF compliance \nlegislation. I am not saying we should not have brought this legislation but leadership goes \nbeyond mere compliance. This is a serious Bill. It deserves a serious engagement and that is \nwhat I intend to offer today in support of its broad objectives. \nWe have to admit that we had laws, albeit fragmented but it is on implementation that \nwe have had issues in the past. Now, this Bill takes us from isolated measures to five \ninterconnected pillars – \n• \ndata strategy; \n• \nasset recovery; \n• \ntransparency; \n• \nexpanded regulatory scope, and  \n• \njudicial speed. \nMadam Speaker, let us begin with what is perhaps the most consequential, conceptual \nexpansion in this Bill. For decades, our regulatory framework spoke of Anti-Money \nLaundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT). This Bill now adds the \nletter ‘P’, Countering Proliferation Financing. This is not an acronym change for the sake of \npaper work. As we speak, the Middle East burns. Wars are being fought with weapons \nfinanced through structures that look on paper to be perfectly legitimate. The same \ninstruments used to hide a corrupt official’s kickback can and have been used to fund the \nacquisition of technologies capable of mass destruction.  \nNow that proliferation is in the game, those who are responsible in the relevant \ninstitutions will have not only to look at where does the money come from, where the \nproceeds come from, whether they come from legitimate or illegitimate proceeds. They \nshould also be thinking about whether the proceeds of a legitimate business are going to be \nused for the wrong intent. Maybe they are buying aluminium tubes but instead of going for \nthe manufacturing of a farm, it will be going for the manufacturing of a nuclear enrichment \nplant. Mauritius as an international financial centre cannot be naïve about this. We cannot say \nit happens elsewhere. Everywhere financial flows move is potentially a transit point. The \naddition of proliferation financing to our compliance obligations is a necessary, mature and \ncourageous step. \nMadam Speaker, I want to bring this discussion down to earth because financial crime \ndoes not always announce itself in the language of weapons programmes and offshore \nfoundations. Sometimes it arrives in a lorry, parfois tractopelle aussi, sometimes it enters \nthrough a port and sometimes it enters with the blessing of the State itself. I refer to the \nmatter of the importation of ti papier, the rolling paper commonly used to smoke cannabis. \nThat was authorised under the previous administration. This was not a grey area import. This \nwas the product of essentially no legitimate commercial application in the volumes imported, \nwhich was staggering and which raised no alarm. No alarm bells and without my dear \ncolleagues, then in the Opposition, this would have remained unknown to the public.  \nMadam Speaker, the volumes imported would have represented at commercial \nwholesale prices, approximately Rs460 million. The question was never satisfactorily \nanswered. It is not just where the product went. The question is where did the money come \nfrom. Who funded this? How was it declared? What due diligence was performed by the \ninstitutions that process those payments? That, Madam Speaker, is precisely the kind of \ntransaction that the amendments to the Financial Intelligence and Anti-Money Laundering \nAct now seeks to capture. The new provisions require reporting persons, banks, financial \ninstitutions, licensed dealers to conduct rigorous customer due diligence to identify beneficial \nownership, to flag transactions that make no obvious commercial stance. A transaction of that \nscale for a product of that nature should have been a red flag on the first day it crossed a \nCompliance Officer’s desk. Ce genre d’affaires, Madame la présidente, n’est pas le résultat \nd’une erreur isolée. C’est le résultat d’un système qui n’a pas posé les bonnes questions. This \nBill, if properly implemented, ensures those questions get asked. \nMadam Speaker, I want to speak plainly about something that every Mauritian sees and \nthat our legal system has historically been unable to address – \n• \nThe person who drives a luxury vehicle that costs several million rupees on a \nsalary that would barely cover its monthly insurance premium.  \n• \nThe individual who resides in a property that, by any rational calculation, would \nrequire decades of their declared income to acquire.  \n• \nThe family whose lifestyle bears no relationship to their formal professional track \nrecord. \nThis again, is not an abstract phenomenon. We have seen it so many times recently. It \nexists, it is visible and for too long, our institutions have lacked both the tools and at times, \nthe will to pursue it. The amendments to the Financial Crimes Commission Act introduced in \nthis Bill are directly targeted at this reality. The concept of property of corresponding in value \nmeans that when a convicted person has hidden or dissipated the proceeds of their crime, the \nState is no longer powerless. It can reach their clean assets, their inherited property, their \nregistered vehicles, their legitimate investments to satisfy the debt they owe to the society. Je \nsuis tenté de dire pour ceux qui ont mal utilisé les proceeds de la MIC, ils doivent trembler.  \nMadam Speaker, one of the architecturally significant reforms in this Bill is the \nstrengthening of beneficial ownerships requirements. The amended Companies Act, the Co-\noperatives Act, the Trust Act, the Foundations Act, all now carry more rigorous obligations to \nidentify, record and report the actual human being who ultimately owns or controls the legal \nentity. We really are looking at the mind who is behind the thinking process and who is \ninstructing the commission of the crime. This matters because the classical structure of \nfinancial crime is not a man walking into a bank with a bag of cash. It is a chain of legal \npurses, each one owned by other, each one incorporated in a different jurisdiction, each one \nobscuring the last until the actual beneficial owner is buried beneath layers of legitimate-\nlooking paper work that no single institution can see them. \nThis Bill addresses that. It defines beneficial ownership broadly and intelligently, \ncapturing control through debt instruments; through differential voting rights; and through the \npower to appoint senior management. These are precisely the mechanisms sophisticated \ncriminals use when they want to own something without appearing to own it.  \nI have the feeling that what this legislation wants to do is to be able to lay the hands of \nthe law on everybody who can take a decision or who can cause a decision to be taken to \ncommit a crime. I hope this will even go beyond debt instruments. It will probably even go \ntowards a big client who can account for 70% of your revenue and thereby can dictate how \nyou should take your decisions. \nMadam Speaker, I must raise a concern that colleagues examining comparable \nlegislations internationally will recognise immediately. In the European Union, under \nAMLD5 and AMLD6, beneficial ownership registers are partially public and crossed-linked \nacross jurisdictions. In the United States, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network \nmaintains a mandatory beneficial ownership registry with a real enforcement. In Singapore, \nthe Monetary Authority maintains an integrated supervisory intelligence framework. \nWhat we have in this Bill is still fundamentally a system of self-declaration. So, when \nthe financial institution is implementing a structure, it will potentially ask its potential client: \n‘Who is your beneficial owner?’ It will ask, in the process, to be provided with a share \nregister to ascertain who are the shareholders. As regards the beneficial ownership, it can \nonly rely on the declaration of the client. So, we have a system which still relies on self-\ndeclaration. We ask entities to declare their beneficial owners. We do not, as yet, build in \nrobust, independent verification mechanisms: cross-database checks against tax records, \ncustoms data, and immigration information. We collect the data, but we are not yet \nweaponizing it. Nous déclarons les bénéficiaires économiques. Nous ne les vérifions pas \nencore de manière systématique. Et un criminel sophistiqué le sait très bien. \nMadam Speaker, I want to borrow a distinction that I think is fundamental to \nunderstanding the limitations of this Bill. There is a difference between compliance-driven \nAML system and an intelligence-driven AML system. This Bill moves us towards the former. \nIt does not yet deliver the latter.  \nA compliance system asks – \n• \nDid the bank fill out the form?  \n• \nDid the real estate agent submit the report? \n• \nDid the trust update the register? \nThese are necessary questions, but they are not sufficient. \nAn intelligence-driven system asks – \n• \nWhat does the data tell us? \n• \nWhere are the patterns? \n• \nWhich sectors? \n• \nWhich structures? \n• \nWhich nationalities of beneficial owners are showing anomalies? \nThe United States, through the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020, moved explicitly \ntowards intelligence-led enforcement, integrating data analytics, enabling information sharing \nbetween private institutions and creating a feedback loop between the FIU and reporting \nentities. \nMadam Speaker, some of the most consequential financial crime investigations in the \nworld were broken open, not by regulators, not by prosecutors, but by insiders. People within \ninstitutions saw something wrong, had the courage to speak and paid a personal price for \ndoing so. That is why countries like the US go further. They incentivise whistleblowers. \nTo conclude, Madam Speaker, I would like to say, I support this Bill. I support it \nbecause our financial system must be clean. I support it because the person living in an \ninexplicable palace, driving a vehicle their salary could never finance, must finally feel that \nthe law is watching. I support it because the institution that allowed ti papie importation of \nthat scale to proceed without scrutiny must now operate in a framework that makes that kind \nof institutional sleep impossible. I support it because compliance with FATF standards is not \na technicality. It is the price of admission to the global financial community, and we have \npaid the cost of exclusion before. We should never pay it again. \nNous avons les institutions. Nous avons l’intelligence. Nous avons la volonté. Ce qu’il \nnous faut, maintenant, c’est le courage de ne pas nous arrêter à ce qui est suffisant et de \npoursuivre ce qui est excellent.  \nMadam Speaker, I thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much.  \nHon. Etwareea! \n(6.40 p.m.) \nMr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d'Or): Merci, Madame \nla présidente. \nLa concurrence entre classes financières internationales est actuellement féroce. Que ce \nsoit entre Genève et Port Louis, que ce soit entre Seychelles et Singapour, que ce soit entre \nNew York et Durban, cette concurrence est vraiment féroce. Si nous voulons rester dans cette \ncourse, nous devons continuellement montrer patte blanche. Si nous voulons préserver nos \nemplois, les 20 000 emplois ; si nous voulons préserver le 12 % de cette industrie dans notre \nPIB, nous devons continuer à montrer patte blanche.  \nDonc, je salue l’initiative de l’honorable ministre des Services financiers pour ce projet \nd’amendement qui va justement dans le sens de maintenir cette tâche financière propre et \nirréprochable. Cette initiative, évidemment, ne tombe pas du ciel. Elle découle de sa volonté, \nde la volonté du gouvernement de colmater les brèches qui existent dans la législation telle \nqu’elle existe aujourd’hui. Les amendements proposés ciblent 24 lois et règlements avec un \nobjectif clair : améliorer l’arsenal juridique et l’efficacité de la lutte contre la criminalité \nfinancière. \nCet exercice, disons-le, se fait dans le cadre d’autres exercices qui auront lieu tout \nbientôt. La première dans le cadre de l’ESAAMLG de la SADC qui aura lieu l’année \nprochaine. Et le second, par le Groupe d’action financière (GAFI) de la place financière \nmauricienne. Donc, ces deux évaluations arrivent et autant prévenir, autant agir avant que des \névaluations négatives puissent nous arriver. \nJe dois dire – comme l’a dit mon ami et collègue, l’honorable Uteem – qu’on aurait \nbien \nvoulu \navoir, \naujourd’hui, \ndans \nl’hémicycle \nl’honorable \nPaul \nBérenger. \nMalheureusement, il est absent dans l’hémicycle. Il nous a beaucoup parlé des risques du \ngrey listing. Le grey listing veut simplement dire que nous tombons dans une liste de pays qui \nne respectent pas les normes établies par le GAFI. Plus concrètement, cela voudrait dire que \nnotre pays pourrait être utilisé pour blanchir de l’argent sale. Mais on n’en est pas là.  \nQuand l’évaluation du GAFI arrivera, il y aura un rapport et le rapport fera un point sur \nla situation. Si besoin, ce rapport fera des recommandations pour qu’on puisse rectifier le tir. \nC’est seulement en cas de refus pour prendre des mesures correctives que le GAFI \nprocéderait au grey listing. Je ne dirais pas qu’on est en train de crier au loup mais, disons, \nqu’on peut donner la chance au gouvernement, à l’honorable ministre, de gérer la chose et \npuis être prêt pour ces évaluations. \nIl y a une très bonne nouvelle, Madame la présidente. Permettez-moi d’évoquer cette \nbonne nouvelle qu’est le classement Global Financial Centres Index 39, c’est-à-dire 2026, qui \nvient d’être publié le 26 mars dernier. Maurice occupe désormais le 50e rang gagnant huit \nplaces sur une année dans les classements mondiales des 120 pays. Mais sur un classement \nrégional, c’est-à-dire Afrique, Moyen-Orient, nous occupons une belle cinquième place \nderrière Dubaï, Abu Dhabi, Doha et Casablanca.  \nL’avenir nous dira si nous allons faire mieux que le pays du Golfe qui se trouvent, \nmalheureusement aujourd’hui, dans le tourment à cause de la guerre israélo-américaine \ncontre l’Iran. Je ne dirais pas que les malheurs des uns font le bonheur des autres mais cette \nguerre a de quoi rabattre les cartes et éventuellement, aider Maurice à se positionner comme \nune alternative au centre financier du Golfe. \nLe Global Financial Centres Index 39, qui vient d’être publié, met aussi en évidence \nquelque chose de très intéressant. Maurice se retrouve à la neuvième place sur une liste des \n15 pays qui vont gagner en importance ces prochaines années. Il faut le dire, il y a 10 ans \ndans ces classements, Maurice occupé le 73e rang sur une liste de 86 pays. \nDonc, Madame la présidente, ne faisons pas la fine bouche et saluons ce bond en avant. \nMais voilà comme je-vous ai déjà dit dans le passé, je me méfie de ces agences occidentales \nqui nous distribuent des notes par ici et des notes par là. Je ne jette pas le bébé avec l’eau du \nbain, mais je peux affirmer que ces agences imposent leurs propres critères à des pays comme \nle nôtre qui n’ont pas d’autres choix que de s’y conformer. N’oublions pas que le Global \nFinancial Centres Index, dont je viens de parler, est une affaire lucrative de l’entreprise \nprivée qui s’appelle Z/Yen. Je me demande en effet quel est le prix, si on paye, qu’on paye \nchaque année pour être listé dans cet indice. \nJe parlais auparavant du GAFI. Il s’agit d’une initiative du G7, initiative lancée en \n1989, si je ne me trompe pas. 1989, Madame la présidente, vous vous souviendrez le monde \nvenait de traverser une grosse crise financière née de la crise de subprimes aux États-Unis qui \na balayé l’Europe et qui a créé la récession partout dans le monde. Et puis là, on a vu que les \ncaisses des états étaient vides mais les entreprises étaient très riches et là les états, à \ncommencer par le G7, a décidé de mettre en place le GAFI qui hébergeait aujourd’hui à \nl’OCDE à Paris pour régulariser, pour amender, pour contrôler les places financières \ninternationales. Évidemment, comme je disais au début, les places financières internationales, \nje parle de Genève, Jersey, Londres, Monaco et puis une autre des nouvelles places \nfinancières comme Maurice, Singapour, Seychelles, nous sommes en concurrence avec les \nplaces financières traditionnelles, si vous voulez. \nDonc, l’OCDE a le pouvoir de nous white list, de nous grey list, de nous black list à \nleur guise alors qu’il devrait aussi balayer devant leur porte. Londres, Jersey, Monaco, \nGenève ne sont-ils pas aussi des machines formidables à blanchir de l’argent sale ? Est-ce que \nleur place financière n’abrite pas l’argent provenant de l’évasion fiscale et des fraudes \nfiscales ? Est-ce qu’on a déjà entendu parler du GAFI black-listant Genève ou grey-listant \nGenève ou Londres ? Souvenez-vous, Madame la présidente, je suis sûre que vous vous \nsouviendrez du livre du sociologue Jean Ziegler, ami du leader du MMM… \nMadam Speaker : Il est venu à Maurice ! \nMr Etwareea : Il est venu à Maurice d’ailleurs. Son livre intitulé ‘La Suisse lave plus \nblanc’. Vous pouvez dire qu’il s’agit d’un ouvrage qui est dépassé maintenant. Certes, mais \nvoilà les vieilles habitudes sont tenaces et nous apprenons régulièrement que des fonds \nillicites ont atterri dans telle ou telle banque à Lugano, à Zurich, ou à Genève. \nMadame la présidente, mais tout cela ne doit pas nous empêcher de maintenir une place \nfinancière irréprochable chez nous. L’enjeu est de taille, on l’a déjà dit, 20,000 emplois cols \nblanc avec des salaires très élevés. Un secteur qui contribue 12,7 % à notre PIB et les \namendements proposés par l’honorable ministre des Services financiers visent effectivement \nà faire le ménage. Car malgré les renforcements constants de nos législations à la matière, \nnous découvrons aussi que nos banques, les fonds d’investissement et autres véhicules \nspéciaux qui sont présents chez nous abrite des fonds douteux et qui portent atteinte à la \nréputation de notre industrie financière. Nous venons d’apprendre que les fonds liés au \ndouteux financière américain Epstein aient pu transiter chez nous ou encore l’homme \nd’affaire malgache Mamy Ravatomanga qui détiendrait les dizaines des comptes bien garnis \nchez nous à travers des sociétés-écrans. Nous connaissons aussi le cas de Jean-Claude Bastos, \nla famille Santos et il y a autant d’enquêtes qui ont lieu ici localement et internationalement. \nDue diligence, Madam Speaker, bonjour, les fonds arrivent malgré le fait que nous \nprétendons que nous avons une place financière propre. Un article publié l’an dernier, en \ndécembre dernier par l’agence financière Bloomberg affirme que notre belle île compte sur \nune population 1,2 millions d’habitants, quelques 5,000 millionnaires, venus d’Afrique du \nSud, Chine et ailleurs, attirés par un taux d’imposition forfaitaire, attirés par l’absence \nd’impôts sur la plus-value, attirés par les successions sans frais, sans compter les sociétés \ndomiciliées à Maurice qui bénéficient parfois des exonérations pouvant aller jusqu’à 95%. Je \nne dis pas qu’ils en touchent les mains sales, mais le cas de Mamy Ravatomanga, arrêté fin \n2025, devrait nous interpeller. Il montre que notre place financière est poreuse.  \nCe n’est pas un problème si tel ou tel homme d’affaires place son argent chez nous \nparce qu’il a confiance de notre place financière mais c’est un problème lorsque cet argent \nprovient de l’évasion ou de la fraude fiscale de la part de particuliers ou d’entreprises \nmultinationales. Et que voyons-nous, Madame la présidente, après les paradise papers qui \navait ébranlé l’offshore mauricien en 2017 ? Le consortium international des journalistes \nd’investigation dénonçait deux ans plus tard, en 2019, la plate-forme mauricienne permettant \naux multinationales de recourir à toutes sortes de pratiques comptables créatives pour \nminimiser les assiettes fiscales là où elles exercent leurs activités, de rapatriés leurs bénéfices \nà Maurice, qui applique une forte concurrence fiscale avec un taux d’imposition comprise \nentre 3 et 15 pour cent. Ce sont ainsi des milliards qui échappent au fisc de ce pays, \nnotamment pays africains pour atterrir chez nous. Ce n’est pas un service que nous rendons à \nl’Afrique avec qui nous voulons établir des liens économiques privilégiés car il s’agit bien \nd’un continent d’avenir. On ne peut pas dépouiller l’Afrique pour faire croître notre place \nfinancière. \nMadame la présidente, les pays africaines ne sont pas dupes par rapport à notre \nindustrie financière et c’est pourquoi, plusieurs d’entre eux ont déjà dénoncé ou renégocié les \naccords de double imposition signés avec nous.  \nMadame la présidente, savez-vous que la minuscule île Maurice figure dans les top cinq \ndes investisseurs pour 17 des quinze économies d’Afrique sub-sahariennes. Donc, nous \nsommes parmi les plus grands investisseurs en Afrique. En République Démocratique de \nCongo, Maurice est à l’origine de 63% des investissements directs étrangers surtout dans les \nsecteurs miniers. Pourtant ces entreprises minières n’ont pas pignon sur rue. Ici, ils sont basés \nen Chine, ils sont basés au Kazakhstan ou en Suisse. Tous les cuivres, tous les cobalts, 67%, \nen effet, des cuivres et des cobalts et d’autres matières premières exploitées, les sièges de leur \nsociété se trouvent ailleurs et pas à Maurice. Mais l’argent de leurs bénéfices arrive dans \nnotre place financière.   \nSelon la banque mondiale, les investissements étrangers effectués à partir de Maurice \ns’élevaient à 312 milliards de dollars en 2022 soit plus de 24 fois notre produit intérieur brute \nqui s’élevait alors à 13 milliards de dollars cette même année. Je crois aussi que nous sommes \noù nous étions jusqu’à que quelques changements interviennent. Nous étions le premier \npourvoyeur des investissements directs en Inde. Allez savoir pourquoi et comment.  \nMadame la présidente, en tant que petite île au moyen limité, nous n’avons pas de choix \nque de conformer aux exigences du GAFI ou de l’Union européen. C’est dans ce contexte \nmême que nous sommes partie prenante de l’accord BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting) \nsigné en 1993 à St-Petersburg. C’était à la suite du sommet du G7 à Paris où les chefs d’états \navaient parlé du BEPS. Donc, au sommet du G20 à St-Petersburg, en présence des plusieurs \nchefs d’états donc Barack Obama, Vladimir Putin, et beaucoup chefs d’états mais surtout \noccidentaux avaient signé le BEPS. Et je disais comme avant, le monde sortait à peine d’une \ngrosse déprime et il fallait vraiment trouver de l’argent et là, les dirigeants mondiaux ont \npensé qu’il faut taxer les multinationales. Il ne faut pas permettre les multinationales de \nshifter leurs bénéfices dans des pays à juridisation plus facile en matière d’impôt.  \nIl fallait donc mettre de l’ordre dans les régimes fiscaux, éliminer la concurrence fiscale \ndéloyale, lutter contre la fraude et l’évasion fiscale et faire de sorte que les multinationales \nqui brassent des milliards, payent des impôts là où ils font les bénéfices. Malheureusement, \nMadame la présidente, c’était la théorie. En réalité, la mise en pratique et le respect de BEPS \nest toute une autre affaire. Ce n’est pas le cas aujourd’hui. Et des pays, des places financières \ncomme le nôtre, nous profitons de ces bids c’est-à-dire les multinationales continuent à \napporter leurs bénéfices ici alors qu’ils ont gagné ces bénéfices dans d’autres pays où ils \néchappent aux fiscs.  Il y a un manque de justice et c’est cela que je suis en train de décrier.  \nC’est pourquoi, Madame la présidente, pour conclure, je plaide que notre place \nfinancière se consolide à travers les amendements proposés ; créer des emplois – on a encore \nbesoin d’emplois –, attire des investissements et s’épanouisse non pas en profiteurs des \nlégislations insuffisantes et poreuses ici et ailleurs mais en construisant une place financière \nsolide, digne de confiance, crédible, sans compromis, sur la transparence et sur l’éthique, sans \ncomplaisance et donc, respectée dans le monde entier.  \nC’est pourquoi je dis un grand oui au réforme législative proposée par notre collègue, \nl’honorable ministre des Services financier.  \n Madam Speaker: Merci beaucoup.  \nMr Assirvaden: Madam Speaker, I beg to move for the adjournment of the debates.  \nMr Mohamed seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to.  \nADJOURNMENT \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Prime Minister.  \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Tuesday 07 April 2026 at 11.30 a.m. \nMr Mohamed seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned! \nI have two Members who want to make adjournment matters. Mr François, then you.  \nMATTERS RAISED \n(6.59 p.m.) \nRODRIGUES – AIR MAURITIUS LANDING PERMIT – REPATRIATION OF \nHUMAN REMAINS \nMr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues): Thank you, Madam Speaker. I \nrise to address a matter of concern to the hon. Prime Minister, with regard to Air Mauritius \nlanding permit and the repatriation of human remains to Rodrigues.  \nI am informed that out of the four ATR aircrafts currently in operation, only one, the \noldest, is accommodating stretches and coffins. Madam Speaker, an inhabitant of Rodrigues, \none late J.C.B., passed away last night in hospital in Mauritius. Although at times, landing \npermit approval takes time, in this particular case, it has already been secured. However, the \nfamily has been advised that the remains of the late J.C.B will now only be repatriated to \nRodrigues by Friday or could be later. In some of the instances, delays extend to even more \ndays. One can appreciate the distress and additional burden such delays impose on already \nvulnerable and aggrieved families in Rodrigues.  \nMadam Speaker, two key issues arise in this regard. First, the difficulty in obtaining \nlanding permits during weekends and delays and second, the delay in the repatriation of \nhuman remains within a reasonable timeframe. In most circumstances, such repatriation \ncould and should be effected within 24 hours. Madam Speaker, is it not time for government \nto consider a special medical service by air?  \nIn light of the above, may I respectfully request the hon. Prime Minister to cause his \ngood office to look into this matter with a view to taking the necessary remedial actions so as \nto ensure a more timely, humane and efficient service for aggrieved families in the future? \nThank you.  \nThe Prime Minister: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Yes, it causes a lot of distress, I am \nsure. I can’t understand why. I know there was a problem with the aircrafts; one of them had \na hard landing but that does not explain why. So, I will take up the matter with Air Mauritius.  \nMr François: Thank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Ramkalawon.  \n(7.01 p.m.) \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 9 – LAVENTURE ELDERLY SHELTER –   \nDEPLORABLE STATE – MEASURES \nMr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil): I have a humble \nrequest to the hon. Minister of Social Security regarding the shelter for the elderly used by \nthe Laventure Senior Citizen Associations in Constituency No. 9, which is in a pitiful state in \nterms of its infrastructure, lack of ventilation, rusting of iron sheet and poles, water leakage \nand others – whether a site visit can be done by officers concerned and needful measures be \nadopted.  \nThank you.  \nThe Minister of Social Security, Social Integration and National Solidarity (Mr A. Subron): The needful will be done and you can accompany us when we do the visit.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay.  \nHon. Beechook, please.  \n(7.02 p.m.) \nCWA – WATER CONNECTION REQUEST – FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION  \nMr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil): So, Madam Speaker, \nmy request is addressed to the hon. Minister of Public Energy and Utilities qui gère la CWA.  \nMadame la présidente, lorsque ceux qui font une demande de connexion à l’eau \ncourante que ce soit résidentielle, agricole ou commerciale, doivent passer sous un processus. \nIls ont besoin de l’approval, de ce qu’on appelle MOD. Et à la suite de la gestion de ce \ndossier, ils sont appelés à faire une contribution financière. Mais souvent, on se retrouve face \nà des situations où ceux qui veulent investir dans le secteur agricole que ce soit hydroponique \nou la culture vivrière ou même industrielle, ils sont obligés de payer ce qu’on appelle \nfinancial contribution.  \nTherefore, I would request the hon. Minister to, first, try to expedite all requests \npertaining to agricultural sectors and secondly, if he could levy this financial contribution for \nall requests for connection related to our agricultural sector because very often, I take this \ncase of one person who wants to have one small hydronic project and he is being requested \npay Rs 50,000 as financial contribution. Maybe this bill could be passed on to those people \nwho sell villas at 40 or 50 million rupees but those who are willing to invest in the sector of \nagriculture. \nThe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities (Mr P. Assirvaden): You are asking to \nwaive it or levy it? \nMr Beechook: Waive it. I am sorry. Yes. Thank you, hon. Minister. So, can the hon. \nMinister please waive this financial contribution at least to those requests pertaining to the \nagriculture sector? Thank you.  \nMr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, je vais reprendre l’affaire avec le MOD \ncommittee de la CWA.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nAt 7.05 p.m. the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 07 April 2026 at \n11.30 a.m. \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nFINANCIAL CRIMES COMMISSION – SEIZED MOTOR VEHICLES– \nNOVEMBER 2024-MARCH 2026",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/195",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 195,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/195) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo  (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to road congestion, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Road Development Authority, \ninformation as to whether a study has been carried out to identify the reasons thereof and, if \nso, indicate the outcome thereof and the road decongestion strategy put in place.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \nYOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT – STATISTICS & JOB INITIATIVES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/196",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 196,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/196) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to youth \nunemployment, he will state – \n(a)  the current rate thereof gender-wise, region-wise and by educational level, and  \n(b)  outline the programmes being implemented to promote employment opportunities \nfor young graduates.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUAN ARTISTS – CULTURAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT – \nOPPORTUNITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/197",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 197,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/197) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nArts and Culture whether, in regard to the Memorandum of Understanding on Cultural \nCooperation signed with the Rodrigues Regional Assembly for 2026–2029, he will state the \ninitiatives envisaged thereunder, indicating how the implementation thereof are expected to \nensure equitable opportunities for Rodriguan artists and practitioners in exchanges, training \nand heritage promotion.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nINTERNATIONAL WARS & CLIMATE CHANGE – IMPACT ON FOOD \nSECURITY – AGRICULTURAL POLICY \n\n136",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/198",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 198,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "B/198\nThe Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet \n(Mr Rookny)  \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Energy and Public Utilities – \n \nWhether, in regard to the costs associated with new \nconnections to the grid of the Central Electricity Board, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the \ndetails of any previous scheme for the provision of network \nextension works free of charge, if any, indicating whether \nconsideration is being given to introducing measures to \nreview same with regards to low income households and \nvulnerable groups, if so, give details thereof, including the \nproposed implementation timeframe therefor? \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                     PAGE 17 of 28 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/199",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 199,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "B/199\nThe Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis \nCentral (Dr Aumeer) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness – \n \nWhether, in regard to Mauritian nationals proceeding \noverseas for medical treatment, he will state the number \nthereof over the past three years, indicating (a) whether his \nMinistry has a list of the medical institutions attended  \n(b) the names of the organisations offering private medical \nservices overseas and whether they are registered with his \nMinistry and (c) whether an audit of the outcome of treatment \nproposed thereto has been carried out?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/200",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 200,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "B/200\nThe Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart \n(Dr Prayag)  \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Local Government – \n \nWhether, in regard to recurrent water accumulation on the \npublic roads and certain localities in Constituency No. 7,  \nPiton and Rivière du Rempart, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the relevant local authorities, information \nas to the sites currently being reviewed, indicating the drains \nand absorption pits (a) cleaned, desilted, upgraded or \nreconstructed since January 2025 to date and (b) earmarked for \ncleaning, desilting, upgrading or reconstruction  under the \nforthcoming financial estimates?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/201",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 201,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/201) Mr F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to the impact \nof international wars and climate change on food security and self-sufficiency, he will state \nwhether he has re-prioritised the agricultural policy of the country in the face of potential \nfood supply chain disruptions and, if so, give details thereof.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/194) \nMAURITIUS HANDBALL ASSOCIATION – FINANCIAL REVAMPING STRATEGY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/202",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 202,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/202) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to handball, he will state the measures \ntaken by his Ministry for the revamping thereof in Mauritius, indicating whether his Ministry \nproposes to help the new Managing Committee of the Mauritius Handball Association in \nreimbursing a debt of more than Rs 10 M following the organization of the Under 17 Beach \nHandball World Championships in Mauritius in 2017.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nTOURISM ACT – MARINE MAMMALS PROTECTION – AMENDMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/203",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 203,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floréal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. B/203) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the Minister \nof Tourism whether, in regard to the proposed introduction in the Assembly of amendments to \nthe Tourism Act for the enhanced protection of marine mammals within our waters, he will \nstate where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nLAGOONS – SWIMMING & SPEED LIMIT ZONES – DEMARCATION ZONES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/204",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 204,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. B/204) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Tourism whether, in regard to the lagoons in Mauritius, he \nwill state – \n(a)  the present status of the demarcation of swimming zones and speed limit zones, \nindicating the number of reported accidents or incidents having occurred thereat \nover the past six months, and  \n(b)  where matters stand as to the proposed maintenance, repairs and reinstatement of \nthe said demarcation zones, giving details of any ongoing or planned works, \ntimelines and key milestones in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFISHERMAN REGISTRATION CARD – CERTIFICATE OF CHARACTER \nREQUIREMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/205",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 205,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/205) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether in \nregard to the Fisherman Registration Card, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to whether it is a prerequisite for the applicants for the issue thereof to hold a \nclean Certificate of Character for eligibility thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMS 2025 – PERFORMANCE REMEDIAL \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/206",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 206,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/206) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the \nperformance of Mauritian candidates in the last Cambridge International Examinations, he \nwill state the remedial measures being taken to address same and the responsibility of the \ndifferent authorities, particularly, the Quality Assurance and Inspection Division, in relation \nthereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nLEASING COMPANIES – REGISTERED & OPERATING IN MAURITIUS – \nFATF NON-COMPLIANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/207",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 207,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/207) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port-Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard \nto the leasing companies, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Financial \nServices Commission/Bank of Mauritius, information as to the current number thereof \nregistered therewith/operating in Mauritius, indicating whether any one of these companies \nhas reportedly failed to comply with international standards such as Financial Action Task \nForce.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBROWN SEQUARD HOSPITAL – UNCLAIMED CORPSES ISSUE – MEASURES \nENVISAGED \n\n138",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/208",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 208,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/208) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Brown Sequard \nHospital, he will state the current number of unclaimed corpses in the mortuary thereof, \nindicating since when same have been lying there and the measures being envisaged to deal \nwith this issue and whether his Ministry is in presence of requests from medical colleges to \nbe handed over same for research purposes and, if so, where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nGEOPOLITICAL SITUATION – FOOD SECURITY – CONTINGENCY PLAN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/209",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 209,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/209) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries \nwhether, in regard to food security, he will state the contingency plan being put in place, if \nany, in the light of the current geopolitical situation.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/194) \n \nFREE INTERNET SCHEME – BENEFICIARIES – VULNERABLE HOUSEHOLDS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/210",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 210,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/210) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nSocial Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity whether, in regard to the Free \nInternet Scheme, he will state the number of persons listed on the Social Register having \nbenefitted free installation and free monthly fiber internet service thereunder, indicating the \nmeasures taken, in collaboration with the Rodrigues Regional Assembly, to ensure the said \nscheme bridges the digital divide among vulnerable households.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSECONDARY SCHOOLS – SYNTHETIC DRUGS – REPORTED CASES & \nPREVENTIVE MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/211",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 211,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/211) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked \nthe Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the secondary schools, \nhe will state the number of reported cases of introduction, possession and consumption of \nsynthetic drugs thereat over the past ten years, indicating the measures being taken to prevent \nthe recurrence thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMINOR F.A. – HOSPITALISATION – MEDICAL CONDITIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/212",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 212,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/212) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to \nminor F.A., admitted to the Brown Sequard Hospital and subsequently transferred to the Dr \nA.G. Jeetoo Hospital, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Child \nDevelopment Unit, information as to the – \n(a) \nname of the shelter of which he was an inmate; \n(b)  reasons for the hospitalisation, and \n(c)  medical conditions thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nOLD GOVERNMENT HOUSE, SECOND FLOOR – NATIONAL HERITAGE \nSITES – CLASSIFICATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/213",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 213,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/213) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the premises which formerly \nhosted the Council of Ministers and the Office of the first Prime Minister of Mauritius, \nnamely, Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam, both situated on the second floor of the Old \nGovernment House, he will state whether consideration will be given for the classification \nthereof as national heritage sites.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 11 – ROAD SAFETY – SPEED TABLES INSTALLATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/214",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 214,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/214) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to road safety, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit, information as to \nthe actions taken, if any, in response to requests from residents of Constituency No. 11 for the \nenhancement thereof in the highly residential areas thereof, including the installation of speed \ntables or other traffic calming measures, indicating whether site surveys, feasibility studies or \ntraffic assessments have been carried out and, if so, give details thereof, including \nimplementation timelines and interim measures being envisaged, if any.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nMAHEBOURG WATERFRONT – STEEL JETTY REPLACEMENT – \nESTIMATED COST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/215",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 215,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/215) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the proposed replacement of \nthe steel jetty situated at the Mahebourg Waterfront, he will state where matters stand, \nindicating the – \n(a) \nestimated cost, and \n(b) \nexpected start and completion dates thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIAN GLOBAL BUSINESS SECTOR – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA \n– INDIA DTAA – IMPACT ASSESSMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/216",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 216,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/216) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the Mauritian \nGlobal Business Sector, she will state whether her Ministry has conducted a thorough and \ndetailed assessment of the impact of the recent judgment of the Supreme Court of India in the \ncase of Tiger Global International II Holdings vs. The Authority for Advance Rulings \nthereon, particularly concerning the future eligibility of Mauritius-resident entities for capital \ngains tax exemptions under the India-Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nUNEXPLOITED AGRICULTURAL LAND – REASONS – MEASURES PROPOSED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/217",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 217,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/217) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand Baie and Poudre D'or) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to agricultural land, he will state the total extent thereof currently unexploited country-\nwide, indicating the – \n(a) \nreasons therefor, and \n(b) \nmeasures being proposed to incentivize the cultivation thereof to ensure self-\nsufficiency and food security.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nTRANSITIONAL HOUSING – NATIONAL POLICY FRAMEWORK – \nPROPOSAL",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/218",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 218,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/218) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to transitional housing, he will \nstate whether his Ministry has put in place a comprehensive national policy framework to \ngovern same and, if so, give details thereof and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMALDIVES – DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS SUSPENSION – ESTABLISHED \nCOMMUNICATION CHANNELS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/219",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 219,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade",
      "question": "(No. B/219) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade \nwhether, in regard to the Maldives, he will state whether following the recent suspension of \nour diplomatic relations therewith, his Ministry has drawn an updated list of Mauritian \nnationals currently residing or employed thereat, indicating the communication channels and \nconsular mechanisms established, if any, to provide timely guidance, assistance and \nprotection thereto and whether any Mauritian national has reached out accordingly and, if so, \nindicate the measures taken in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBRITANNIA POST OFFICE – PROPOSED RENOVATION – COMPLETION & \nREOPENING DATES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/220",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 220,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/220) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation \nwhether, in regard to the proposed renovation of the Britannia Post Office, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from Mauritius Post Ltd., information as to the expected start, \ncompletion and reopening dates thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGRAND SABLE FOOTBALL GROUND – LIGHTING FACILITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/221",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 221,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "B/221\nThe Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart \n(Dr Prayag)  \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Land Transport – \n \nWhether, \nin \nregard \nto \nvehicles \ndeclared \ntotal \nloss, \ndecommissioned or otherwise considered not roadworthy but \nreturned on the public circuits following extensive repairs, he \nwill state whether consideration will be given for a review of the \nexisting legislation to ensure stricter traceability, disclosure \nand roadworthiness certification in respect of such vehicles?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/222",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 222,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/222) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the project for the installation \nof lighting facilities at the football ground of Grand Sable, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the District Council of Grand Port, information as to the expected date of \nimplementation thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUES LABOUR OFFICE – LABOUR DISPUTES – JURISDICTION \nREVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/223",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 223,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/223) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the \nMinister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to labour disputes, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the Rodrigues Labour Office, information as to the \nnumber thereof registered thereat since 2023 to date in respect of which employers involved \ntherein but domiciled in Mauritius could not be sued before the Industrial Court in Rodrigues, \nindicating the measures taken by his Ministry regarding same, including whether \nconsideration is being given for proposed amendments to be brought to the relevant \nlegislation to ensure that the place of performance of work remains the primary criterion for \nterritorial jurisdiction.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \nMAHEBOURG MUSEUM – RENOVATION WORKS – REOPENING TIMELINE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/224",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 224,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "B/224\nThe Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne \nLongue (Mr Caserne)  \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Energy and Public Utilities – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Priest Peak Reservoir, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, \ninformation as to where matters stand regarding the proposed \nincrease of the water supply capacity thereof, indicating the \nexpected implementation timeframe thereof? \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                     PAGE 24 of 28 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/225",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 225,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/225) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the Mahebourg Museum, he will \nstate the expected re-opening date thereof, giving details of the renovation works which have \nbeen or will be carried out thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURI-FACILITIES – NATIONAL CLEAN UP CAMPAIGN – SERVICES & \nRESOURCE ALLOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/226",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 226,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "B/226\nThe Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne \nLongue (Mr Caserne)  \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Local Government – \n \nWhether, in regard to the street lighting systems on public \nroads, he will state whether consideration will be given for the \nmaintenance thereof to be entrusted to the Central Electricity \nBoard and, if so, when and, if not, why not?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/227",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 227,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/227) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in \nregard to the services provided under the National Clean Up Campaign by Mauri-Facilities, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from Mauri-Facilities and table information as to \nthe – \n(a) \nnumber of employees thereof posted – \n(i) \nconstituency-wise; and  \n(ii) \nin each District Council and Municipal Council, respectively; \n(b) \nbudget allocated thereto over the past six months; and  \n(c) \nnumber of – \n(i) \nlawn mowing;  \n(ii) \ntree and bush truncating, and  \n(iii) high-pressure cleaning services carried out respectively, over the past six \nmonths in Constituency No. 6.",
      "answer": "Reply: Mauri-Facilities Management Co. Ltd was transferred from Landscope \n(Mauritius) Ltd to the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate \nChange on 11 April 2025.  \nMauri-Facilities Management Co. Ltd does not operate on a constituency-wise basis, \nbut on a region-wise basis. \nWith regard to part (a) of the parliamentary question, Mauri-Facilities Management Co. \nLtd has a total workforce of 2,251 workers posted on a region-wise basis as follows – \n \n \nRegion \nWorkforce \nPort Louis \nPamplemousses \nRivière du Rempart \nFlacq \nGrand Port \nSavanne \nMoka \nBlack River \nCurepipe \nBeau-Bassin / Rose-Hill \nQuatre Bornes \nVacoas-Phoenix \nGrand Bassin \nTotal \n2,251 \n \nMauri-Facilities Management Co. Ltd operates two programmes, namely –  \n(i) \nthe “Cleaning of Schools” Programme for the cleaning of yards and toilets in 280 \ngovernment primary and secondary schools across the island, and \n(ii) \nthe “National Clean-Up” Programme to provide cleaning support in addition to \ncleaning works carried out by local authorities and in the context of national \nfestivals.  \nMauri-Facilities Management Co. Ltd also assists the Road Development Authority for \nthe cleaning of the edge verges of the motorways M1 and M2. \n With regard to part (b) of the Parliamentary Question, out of the budgeted provision \nof Rs520 million for the current financial year, an amount of Rs210 million has been incurred \nover the past six months. \n Regarding part (c) of the parliamentary question, Mauri-Facilities Management Co. \nLtd is currently involved in the cleaning of edge verges of the M2 Motorway, which also \nincludes the cleaning of the stretch of the highway up to the roundabout at La Croisette, \nGrand Baie.  \nMauri-Facilities Management Co. Ltd presently has 105 brush cutters for use across the \nisland and has already awarded the contract for 100 new brush cutters expected to be received \nby end of June 2026.  \nWith regard to high pressure cleaning, 85 equipment are available and such services are \nprovided only to schools. Two hundred additional high pressure cleaning equipment are \nexpected to be received by June 2026. \nLABOUR OFFICERS – TRAINING SESSIONS – RODRIGUES OFFICE \nPARTICIPATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/228",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 228,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/228) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the \nMinister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to the professional \ndevelopment of Labour Officers, he will state the number of training sessions, workshops and \nseminars organised by his Ministry therefor since January 2025 to date, indicating the – \n(a) \nthemes covered, particularly, regarding the enforcement of the Workers' Rights \nAct and the Occupational Safety and Health regulations  \n(b) \nnumber of officers from the Rodrigues Labour Office invited to attend same, and \n(c) \nmeasures taken to ensure that training is decentralised or made accessible via \ndigital platforms for officers stationed in Rodrigues.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nNOUVELLE FRANCE – WATER PUMP FAILURES – WATER RESTORATION \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/229",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 229,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/229) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the water pump \nfailures at Nouvelle France over the past few months, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to the short-term and long-term \nmeasures being envisaged respectively, to restore a stable and continuous water supply \nthereat, giving details thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGLYPHOSATE – BANNING – SAFE AGRO-ECOLOGICAL PRACTICES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/230",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 230,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "B/230\nThe Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet \n(Mr Rookny)  \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, \nBlue Economy and Fisheries – \n \nWhether, in regard to agricultural land conversion projects \napproved over the past fifteen years, he will state  \n(a) the number of private promoters or developers who were \nrequired to vest land in the State for public purposes but failed \nto do so, indicating the (i) extent of land concerned therewith \n(ii) reasons therefor and (iii) measures being taken to ensure \ncompliance thereto, indicating the expected implementation \ntimeframe therefor and (b) whether consideration is being \ngiven for the vesting of land for food production and for the \nregularisation of places of worship currently established on \nsuch lands?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/231",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 231,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "B/231\nThe Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière \n(Mr Quirin)  \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Local Government – \n \nWhether, in regard to the renovation of the football \nplayground at Morcellement La Confiance, in Beau-Bassin,  \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Municipal \nCouncil of Beau Bassin/Rose Hill, information as to where \nmatters stand? \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                     PAGE 26 of 28 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/232",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 232,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "B/232\nThe Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart \n(Dr Prayag)  \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Local Government – \n \nWhether, in regard to abandoned, derelict or unsafe private \nbuildings and premises in Constituency No. 7, Piton and  \nRivière du Rempart, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the relevant local authorities, information as to the  \n(a) number of complaints received in relation thereto since \nJanuary 2025 to date, indicating  the number of notices served \nupon the owners or occupiers thereof and (b) action/s taken by \nthe relevant local authorities to secure, clean, close off, repair \nor carry out the demolition thereof? \n \n \n \nBibi Safeena Lotun, C.S.K. (Mrs)                                          \n Clerk of the National Assembly \n \nParliament House \nPort Louis  \n \n27 March 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                     PAGE 27 of 28 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org \n \nMAURITIUS NATIONAL ASSEMBLY \nQuestions of which notice has been given \nNot Requiring an Oral Answer \nSitting of Tuesday 31 March 2026 \n \n \nQuestions addressed to Honourable Ministers, other than to   \nDr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs \nand External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for \nRodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/9",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 9,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "A/9\nThe Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka \n(Dr Ms Thannoo)  \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Education and Human \nResource –  \n \nWhether, in regard to Agalega,  he will give a breakdown of the \nnumber of children enrolled in pre-primary, primary and \nsecondary levels for the 2026 academic year, indicating the  \n(a) specific pedagogical support and infrastructure provided \nthereto and (b) arrangements made (i) for students travelling \nto Mauritius for further studies, giving details of  the \naccommodation and psychological support provided and  \n(ii)  to bridge educational gaps and ensure the full integration \nof each of these students?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/10",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 10,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. A/10) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to glyphosate, he will state whether consideration will be given for the banning thereof \nand ensuring the implementation of safe agro-ecological practices to protect both human \nhealth and nature having regard to the high incidence of cancer, especially, among women \nwhose reproductive bodies have been scientifically proven to absorb more toxins emanating \nfrom chemical pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers.",
      "answer": "Reply: The importation of glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides is currently \nauthorised for use in Mauritius under strict regulatory control in accordance with the \nDangerous Chemicals Control Act 2004. Under this Act, only licensed importers are \nauthorised to import glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides in its granular form.   \nThe product is applied in the fields as per the “directions for use” on the label while \nusing the appropriate personal protective equipment.  \nIn light of international concerns regarding the potential health risks of glyphosate, \nincluding recent findings from the Ramazzini Institute linking long-term exposure to \ncarcinogenic effects, my Ministry is adopting a precautionary approach. A Technical \nCommittee together with The Dangerous Chemicals Control Board is closely monitoring \nemerging scientific evidence and international regulatory developments with regard to \nglyphosate. \nAt this stage, while an outright ban is not being implemented, the Ministry is giving due \nconsideration to – \n• \nrestricting its use in sensitive and public areas, including roadsides;  \n• \nstrengthening control over importation, distribution and application, and  \n• \npromoting safer alternatives.  \nFurthermore, emphasis is being placed on the progressive adoption of agro-ecological \npractices, including – \n• \nreduction in reliance on chemical inputs;  \n• \ntraining on the safe use of pesticides and herbicides, and \n• \nencouragement of environmentally sustainable farming methods. \nMy Ministry is also mindful of concerns regarding vulnerable groups, including \nwomen, and the broader issue of exposure to chemical pesticides. In this context, public \nsensitisation, proper use of personal protective equipment, and responsible handling of \npesticides are being reinforced. \nWhile glyphosate remains authorised based on current international assessments, my \nMinistry is pursuing a balanced, science-based and precautionary policy, which includes risk \nreduction measures and a gradual transition towards safer agro-ecological alternatives, with \nthe overarching objective of protecting both human health and the environment. \n \nGOVERNMENT PROGRAMME 2025-2029 – 40-HOURS’ WORK WEEK \nESTABLISHMENT – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/11",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 11,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "A/11\nThe Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka \n(Dr Ms Thannoo)  \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness – \n \nWhether, in regard to the current need for more nurses and \nhealth assistants in public hospitals, he will state whether \nconsideration will be given for the promotion of the current \nhealth assistants with over ten years' experience through \nrecognition of prior learning and the provision of continuous \nprofessional development to the grade of nurse?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/12",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-31-march-2026",
      "date": "2026-03-31",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 12,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. A/12) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to the proposed \nestablishment of the 40-hours’ work week, as stipulated in the Government Programme 2025-\n2029, he will state whether consideration will be given for measures to be taken to ensure that \nit is the standard employment structure across all relevant industries and sectors in Mauritius.",
      "answer": "Reply: My Ministry held the “Assises du Travail et de l’Emploi” from 23 to 25 \nSeptember 2025, whereby the implementation of the 40-hours work week in non-essential \nsectors, as announced in the Government Programme 2025-2029, was discussed among \ntripartite stakeholders.  \nHowever, no consensus was reached by the tripartite constituents thereat. \nMembers of the business community sought clarifications on the specific services and \nsectors which would be excluded from the application of the proposed measure. They also \nsuggested that reducing working hours from 45 hours to 40 hours per week should entail a \nreduction in wages and would also affect the minimum wages. \nIn view thereof, my Ministry will hold further consultations with relevant stakeholders \nprior to making a proposal to Government.",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/233",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 233,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/233) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nforthcoming FIFA World Cup 2026, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nMauritius Broadcasting Corporation, information as to the arrangements being made, if any, \nfor the broadcast of the matches thereof on the channels of the Corporation.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Director General of the \nMauritius Broadcasting Corporation that the broadcast and sub-licensing rights for the FIFA \nWorld Cup of 2026 across the African region, including Sub-Saharan Africa, are held by New \nWorld Televisions SA, which is a company based in Togo. \nThe two main broadcasting rights which are most commonly commercialised to \nbroadcasters are free-to-air broadcasting rights and pay TV broadcasting rights. The free-to-\nair broadcasting rights for the FIFA World Cup of 2026 are meant only for public \nbroadcasters whereby the public can access the channels without paying any subscription fee. \nThe pay TV broadcasting rights are meant for subscription television operators only. \nOn 02 December 2025, an agreement was signed between the Mauritius Broadcasting \nCorporation and the New World Televisions SA – which as I said, is a company based in \nTogo – in respect of the FIFA World Cup of 2026. Under this agreement, the Mauritius \nBroadcasting Corporation has secured the rights to broadcast 34 free-to-air matches out of the \n104 matches scheduled for the tournament, as included in the package allocated to Sub-\nSaharan Africa. This package comprises the opening ceremony, the closing ceremony, some \nof the matches and the final. These matches will be broadcast on the MBC 11 Sports Channel. \nThe full FIFA World Cup 2026 package will be made available on the MBC Play App. \nThis is a digital streaming platform, developed to deliver television and multimedia content \ndirectly to viewers over the internet upon a payment of a subscription fee of Rs300. I wish to \npoint out that, for the FIFA World Cup of 2022, the MBC Play App was available on smart \nphones only. However, this year, the current MBC Play App is being upgraded and will be \ncompatible on both smart TVs and smart phones. \nMadam Speaker: Smart TVs and phones, okay. Hon. Ramkalawon, okay? Hon. \nBeechook, yes! \nSILVER BANK LIMITED – AUDITED ACCOUNTS COPY – DEPOSITS QUANTUM \n– CONSERVATOR’S REPORT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/234",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 234,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/234) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Silver Bank \nLimited, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Bank of Mauritius – \n(a) \ncopy of the audited accounts thereof, including copy of the balance sheet and \ntable same; \n(b) \ninformation as to – \n(i) \nthe quantum of deposits held thereat by public bodies/institutions; \n(ii) \nwhether an inquiry has been initiated into the circumstances surrounding \nthe granting of the banking licence and the deposits by the public \nbodies/institutions, and  \n(c) \nwhether the Conservator appointed therefor has submitted its report and, if so, \ntable copy thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed by the Bank of Mauritius that, in accordance with the Banking Act 2004, banks \nhave up to three months from the end of their financial year to submit their audited accounts, \nand I am further informed that the latest available audited accounts of Silver Bank Limited \nare for the financial year ending 31 December 2021. I am tabling a copy of the audited \naccounts. \nMadam Speaker, Silver Bank has not submitted its audited accounts to the Bank of \nMauritius for the financial years 2022 and 2023. In fact, Silver Bank was unable to appoint \nany external auditor. The reason being that the auditors were unwilling to conduct the \nassignment for Silver Bank in the light of the previous serious adverse information regarding \nPrateek Gupta in the Trafigura case whereby freezing orders were issued both on Prateek \nGupta and his wife Ginni Gupta, who is the main ultimate beneficial owner of the bank. \nThe House will recall, Madam Speaker, that it was at its meeting held on 11 June 2021 \nthat the Board of the Bank of Mauritius approved the acquisition of the shares of BanyanTree \nBank by the shareholders of Silver Bank. The Board of the Directors of the Bank of \nMauritius were then chaired by the then former Governor of the bank, that is, Mr Harvesh \nKumar Seegolam.  \nThe Banking Act 2004 provides that no single shareholder should hold more than 10% \nof the shares in a bank, except with the prior approval of the Bank of Mauritius. Given that \nthe BanyanTree Bank Ltd was under conservatorship, the approval of a 75% shareholding to \na single shareholder, 75%, in this case it was Ginni Gupta, who, may I inform the House, had \nno banking experience at all, but this was granted by the Board. 75% to somebody who has \nno experience in banking, Madam Speaker. This was nothing short of a scandalous and very \nsuspicious transaction while also endangering the existing and future depositors.   \nWhen we look at the pattern of events, there was clearly an axis of evil which existed \nfrom the very inception of Silver Bank in our jurisdiction. The House would not be surprised \nto note that one of the close associates of Mr Gupta, one Mr Prasad Rao Bopamah was even \npicked up from the tarmac at SSR International Airport with a total VIP treatment, red carpet \ntreatment upon the instructions of the former Minister of Finance.  \n(Interruptions) \nIt looks like this. \nAn hon. Member: Savat Dodo! \nThe Prime Minister: Du jamais vu dans les annales de notre pays ! This is how the \nprevious MSM regime was operating – Mafia style! I hope people remember all this when the \ntime of elections comes, which will not be now, of course. \nMadam Speaker, in February 2024, Silver Bank was placed under conservatorship by \nthe Bank of Mauritius, just like its predecessor, the BanyanTree Bank. At that time, the \nactions taken by the Bank of Mauritius included the issue of several cautionary letters, \nrequiring for additional capital, and the imposition of restrictions on the granting of loans. \nSilver Bank completely ignored those instructions from Bank of Mauritius. Once Silver Bank \nwas placed in conservatorship, several potential investors expressed an interest to acquire it.  \nHowever, only one prospective investor submitted an application in May 2024 to acquire \nsignificant interest in Silver Bank.   \nThe investor’s business plan was rejected in December 2024 because the proposed \nequity injection was inadequate.  In April 2025, a second offer for the acquisition was made \nby a local investment vehicle set up in Mauritius. The Bank of Mauritius has been engaging \nwith the prospective applicant since then, including on the requisite information for the \ncompletion of the application. In the interest of depositors and creditors, the Bank of \nMauritius granted several extensions to each successive deadline in December 2025, in \nJanuary and February 2026 to allow the applicant to complete his application. He was asking \nfor extra time all the time, that he be given more time, more time, more time. \nAs at 30 March 2026, the Bank of Mauritius had not received a complete application.  \nIt is noteworthy that documents relating to proof and source of funds had not been submitted \nas at date. The Board of the Bank of Mauritius met on 30 March 2026 to discuss the way \nforward on Silver Bank.  Based on all the available facts and information and taking into \naccount the financial situation of Silver Bank, the Board decided to terminate the \nconservatorship of Silver Bank and appoint a receiver.  \nAnother shocking element of this Silver Bank saga, Madam Speaker, was the \nconfession made by one internal auditor of Silver Bank that he uncovered loans of about \nRs7.7 billion which were granted to companies related to no other than Prateek Gupta. \nFurthermore, this auditor stated Rs18 million were transferred to Prateek Gupta or to entities \nbelonging to him from Silver Bank. They allowed the transfer. \nThis is a classic case, Madam Speaker, of institutional conspiracy of the highest order, \nwith both internal and external connivances, to defraud depositors’ money. Needless to say, \nthat the Internal Auditor – because it was MSM Government – he drew the attention, he was \nsuspended. He was the guilty party to have drawn the attention of the bank. So, he was \nsuspended when in fact, his courage should have been commended. No doubt, we will see \nmore things like this as the investigation unfolds.  \nMadam Speaker, as regard to part b (i) of the question, I am informed that public bodies \nand institutions had invested a total amount of Rs3.55 billion in Silver Bank.   \nAn hon. Member: Or made to invest! \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, I am going to say that. As at 28 February 2026, the \nremaining deposits held by public bodies and institutions at the Silver Bank, amounted to \naround Rs907 million and they are as follows – \n(a) \nRs523 million by the COVID-19 Projects Development Fund – Rs523 million; \n(b) \nRs158 million by the National Insurance Co. Ltd and Rs132 million by the NIC \nGeneral Insurance Co. Ltd, both subsidiaries of the National Property Fund Ltd; \n(c) \nRs58 million by the Municipal Council of Curepipe, and \n(d) \nRs36 million by the Sugar Insurance Fund Board. \nMadam Speaker, as I have already stated in this august Assembly, the deposits made by \nthese public bodies and the institutions were purposely done to create a misleading \nenhancement of Silver Bank’s balance sheet. Purposely done! The significant investment \nmade in a bank with no proven track record – no proven track record! – speaks for itself that \nthe decision has been driven by intervention from the highest authorities. And we know! In \nfact, from the former Minister of Finance and the former Financial Secretary.  It is ironic to \nrecall, Madam Speaker, that these same authorities – same authorities – had issued a Circular \nway back in 2019 instructing government‑related entities to place their surplus cash in \nTreasury Certificates, which carry far lower risk.  You can guess, Madam Speaker, why the \nformer Minister of Finance revised that decision and ensured that these public bodies and \ninstitutions place their money with a bank with no proven track record, and hence, putting \ntheir investments at risk. When you think of this also that this guy was given VIP treatment at \nthe airport! \nAs for part (b) (ii) of the question, I am informed by the Bank of Mauritius that, in \nJanuary 2025, only after there was a change in government, the Conservator made a \nstatement to the Police with regard to what appeared to be a conspiracy to defraud Silver \nBank in favour of Mrs Ginni Gupta or companies beneficially owned or related to her and/or \nMr Prateek Gupta. \nSubsequent to this statement, the Commissioner of Police referred the matter to the \nFinancial Crimes Commission (FCC). \nTwo suspects have been arrested for the offence of “Conspiracy to commit Money \nLaundering” in breach of Section 4 of the Financial Intelligence and Anti-Money Laundering \nAct 2002. INTERPOL has also been requested to place Mr Gupta on Red Notice in relation \nto the investigation in Mauritius. \nFurther actions by the FCC include – \n(a) \nDisclosure order made on 19 parties who have applied and obtained, in relation to \nmaterial financial reports, which has been forensically analysed, which has shown \na total sum of Rs7.9 billion has been siphoned and transferred to several entities \nin multiple jurisdictions linked, again, to Mr Gupta; \n(b) \n39 loan files secured from Silver Bank following search warrants issued under \nSection 64 of FCC Act 2023; \n(c) \n43 witness statements recorded; \n(d) \n11 defence statements from suspects; \n(e) \n 2 search warrants under Section 60 issued on premises of suspects – I prefer not \nto mention their names – who were later arrested for the offence of “conspiracy to \ncommit money laundering” in breach of Section 4 of the FIAMLA 2002; \n(f) \nInformal cooperation for funds which have already been traced and transferred to \nforeign jurisdictions and to locate other foreign suspects who have already left \nMauritius; \n(g) \nAn Attachment Order of USD 53,000 currently in force up to March 2027 on \nentities linked to Prateek Gupta; \n(h) \n 8 Mutual Legal Assistance applications are in process with Seychelles, UK, \nMalaysia, Singapore, South Africa, British Virgin Island, USA and UAE. \nConcerning part (c) of the question, I am informed by the Bank of Mauritius that the \nConservator submitted his report on a regular basis. The latest report was submitted in March \n2026. However, as per the Bank of Mauritius Act and the Data Protection Act, these reports \ncannot be made public until maybe the investigation is over. \nI am informed by the Bank of Mauritius that the Conservator, Mr Arvin Gokhool, was \nmaintained as Conservator as he was already in discussion with a potential buyer of Silver \nBank. The Bank felt that replacing him midway in the process would have set the process \nbackward and cause further delays with additional financial implications with the coming of a \nnew Conservator. \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed by the Bank of Mauritius that, in the very first \nreport of the Conservator submitted in March 2024, he estimated that non-performing loans \namounted to Rs8.1 billion out of a total loan portfolio of Rs8.3 billion.  Rs8.3 billion was \ngiven; Rs8.1 dubious! It is unthinkable that such a high level of toxicity of a loan portfolio \ncould have been tolerated by both the Silver Bank and the Central Bank, which turned a blind \neye to this monumentous mismanagement, if not defrauding people. \nAs at date, only a sheer amount of around Rs209 million has been recovered since the \nplacement of Silver Bank under conservatorship. \nMadam Speaker, these figures point to not only a clear pattern of gross \nmismanagement, but also a deliberate fraud, deliberately misleading the Mauritian public, \nraising concerns to the control mechanism that governed the operations of Silver Bank and \nthe Bank of Mauritius at the time. \nWe have, without any reservation, condemned the conduct of that bank in the past.  It is \nyet another catastrophic legacy of the previous government, and we now have to deal with it.  \nToday, allow me to reassert our determination and to state unequivocally and forcefully \nthat we will not allow our reputation as a well-regulated international financial sector to be \nthe least tarnished. \nMadam Speaker, it is precisely for this reason that we are reinforcing our legislative \nframework through the introduction of the AML/CFT/CPF Bill, which is being discussed at \nthe moment, to further strengthen the fight against money laundering. \nMs Anquetil: Scandaleux! \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister.  \nYes, hon. Beechook! \nMr Bhagwan: Ali Baba sa! \nAn hon. Member: Ali Baba depase sa! \nMr Beechook: I thank the hon. Prime Minister for his reply.  \nMadam Speaker, this financial disaster would not have been possible without the \negregious… \nMadam Speaker: No statements! \nMr Beechook: …violation and collapse… \nMadam Speaker: No statements! \nMr Beechook: …of the regulatory framework. \nMadam Speaker: Question! Question! \nMr Beechook: Therefore, I would ask the hon. Prime Minister whether he will initiate \na full-fledged commission of enquiry so that the public gets to know the in and out of this \nmega financial crime, and also, the culprits be dragged to court? Thank you. \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, there is no commission of enquiry now. It is \npublic enquiries. But this is why we are bringing drastic change in the organisation of the \nPolice and the FCC.  \nWith this new Bill that will come to the House, we will then have people who know to \ntrace audit trails. We do not have the ability at the moment. This is why they are getting away \nwith it. We will put in place people who know how to do these works, and – to use your word \n– we will drag each and every one of them to court. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Juman! \nMr Juman: Thank you, Madam Speaker. The hon. Prime Minister mentioned only \nRs209 million were recovered. \nMadam Speaker: Question! Question! \nMr Juman: Can I know from the hon. Prime Minister how much did the \nconservatorship cost? \nThe Prime Minister: In fact, the result – only Rs209 million has been recouped. Yes, \nonly that, so far. \nMr Juman: The fees? \nThe Prime Minister: I am sorry? \nMr Juman: How much did the conservatorship cost? \nMadam Speaker: No, no, don’t speak from a sitting position! \nThe Prime Minister: Oh, the fees! \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Juman! \nThe Prime Minister: I expected this question to come from somebody. \nThe fees of the same person, whom they kept – the Bank of Mauritius decided to keep \nhim –, and reduced his fees by half. I can give you the total amount later. \nMs Anquetil: Incroyable! \nMadam Speaker: Members should not speak from a sitting position. We cannot even \nhear! I cannot hear very well! \nAlso, no more statements before questions! Let me say: it is so easy to use the words \n“who”, “when”, “how” or “whether”. Then, you put whatever you want! Then, it is a \nquestion! Leçon de grammaire! \nMr Jhummun: Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nDr. Aumeer: Petite Bescherelle! \nMr Jhummun: We can see here a very good example of deux poids, deux mesures \nwhen we compare the case of the Bramer Bank and the Silver Bank.  \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Jhummun, I… \nMr Jhummun: Why was the previous government so prompt in the case of the Bramer \nBank and so slack when it comes to the Silver Bank? Thank you. \nThe Prime Minister: It is a very good question! \nFor Bramer Bank, they cooked up a story of Ponzi Scheme. And then, much later, after \neverything was done, after the former Prime Minister, former Minister Bhadain and all the \npeople close to them took the money from the bank, then they closed the bank. The public? \nNever mind the public! They can lose their money! But they, who already have a lot of \nmoney, will not lose their money. It was deux poids, deux mesures! This was done on \npurpose! \nDr. Boolell: Insider dealing! \nThe Prime Minister: Yes! And we are going to sit on this again. \n(Interruptions) \nMs Anquetil: Scandaleux! \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Yes, Mr Beechook! Your last… \nMr Beechook: I am still choosing my words: whether, how, when… \nMadam Speaker: Yes, please! \nMr Beechook: How far… \nMadam Speaker: Very good! \nMr Beechook: May I ask the hon. Prime Minister what quantum of the depositors’ \nmoney can we expect to recover and give back to them in this particular scam? \nThe Prime Minister: It is a very difficult question. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, it is a tall order for him. \nMr Jhummun: Looking for them! \nThe Prime Minister: They have stolen the money wherever they placed them, I don’t \nknow. So, we are going to have to do the audit trail to know. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you so much. Mr Beejan! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 6 – MODIFIED MOTORCYCLE EXHAUSTS – \nCONTRAVENTIONS (01 MARCH-05 APRIL 2026)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/235",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 235,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/235) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to modified \nmotorcycle exhausts, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of \nPolice, information as to the number of contraventions booked by each police station in \nConstituency No. 6, Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or in relation thereto, since 01 March 2026 to \ndate, indicating the number thereof relating to noise pollution.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, Regulation 83(3) of the Road Traffic \n(Construction and Use of Vehicles) Regulations 2010 provides that no person shall modify \nthe exhaust pipe of a motor vehicle likely to cause excessive or unusual noise or to alter the \nsilencer causing greater noise. \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Police that Constituency No. 6, Grand Baie and \nPoudre d’Or is covered by five Police Stations. Since 01 March 2026 to 05 April 2026, \nsixteen contraventions relating to alterations of silencers to motorcycles exhausts have been \nissued as follows – \n(i) \nsix cases by the Goodlands Police Station; \n(ii) \nthree cases by the Poudre d’Or Police Station; \n(iii) three cases by the Plaine des Papayes Police Station; \n(iv) three cases by the Grand Gaube Police Station, and \n(v) \none case by the Grand Baie Police Station. \nWith a view, Madam Speaker, to strengthening deterrence and curbing down noise \npollution from modified exhaust systems, the Fourth Schedule of the Road Traffic Act has \nbeen amended in 2025 to increase the fine related to modified exhaust systems by motor \nvehicles under Regulation 83(3) from Rs2,000 to Rs10,000 now. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! One question! \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Whether, given that deterrence of modified \nmotorcycle exhaust offences and no wearing of helmet while riding motorcycle require \nsustained enforcement capacity during both day time and night time hours, will the hon. \nPrime Minister consider directing the Commissioner of Police to allocate additional police \nofficers to each police station so that these police officers can conduct regular monitoring, \nrespond quickly to public complain and maintain a visible deterrent presence with adequate \nequipment? Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Prime Minister! \nThe Prime Minister: We will, but there is an exercise of recruiting more police \nofficers at the time. \nMadam Speaker: Next time, you come straight to the question, please! \nYes, Mr Rookny! \nMr Rookny: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Will the hon. Prime Minister advise if he is \nsatisfied with the work of the enforcement work being done by the police in respect of the \nmotorcycle activities as mentioned by hon. Beejan? \nThe Prime Minister: One can never be totally satisfied but we do with what we have. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Next question, Mr A. Duval! \nHON. PAUL RAYMOND BÉRENGER – FORMER DPM - RESIGNATION – \nSUBSEQUENT RESIGNATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/236",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 236,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/236) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the recent resignation of Honourable Paul Raymond Bérenger, GCSK, as Deputy \nPrime Minister, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the other \nresignations that have followed in relation to – \n(a)  Mauritius Missions abroad;  \n(b)  parastatal bodies;  \n(c)  advisory positions;  \n(d)  State-owned enterprises, and  \n(e)  State institutions.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed that, as at 03 April 2026, there \nhave been 31 resignations following the resignation of hon. Paul Raymond Bérenger, GCSK \nas Deputy Prime Minister. \nIn regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that there has not been any \nresignation from our overseas missions. \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, there have been 18 resignations in Parastatal \nBodies. These resignations are – \n• \nOn 23 March 2026, I will give the names – \n(i) \nMr Ashwen Naidu as Member of the Mauritius Film Development \nCorporation; \n(ii) \nMr Kheshaw Kumar Jhummun as Legal Advisor, for the Sugar Industry \nLabour Welfare Fund; \n(iii) Mr Shaad Chellapermal as Chairperson of the National Youth Council, and \n(iv) Mr Manorgaren Thirpathee as Board Member of the Mauritius Institute of \nEducation. \n• \nOn the 24 of March – \n(i) \nMs Daniella Bastien as part time Chairperson of the Outer Islands \nDevelopment Corporation; \n(ii) \nMr Lionel Jonathan Lajoie as Member of the Conservatoire National de \nMusique Francois Mitterrand Trust Fund; \n(iii) Mr Iqbal Calcateea as Chairperson of the Mauritius Sports Council, and \n(iv) Dr Kailsah B. Sobha as Member of the Mauritius Institute of Education. \n• \nOn 25 March 2026 – \n(i) \nMr Critanand Atmah as Member of the Mauritius Marathi Cultural Centre \nTrust; \n(ii) \nMs Gabriella Batour as Member of the National Heritage Fund; \n(iii) Mrs Maire Corina Catherine Christ as Chairperson of National Adoption \nCouncil, and \n(iv) Mrs Brigitte Roussety as Independent Member of the National Women’s \nCouncil. \n• \nNow, on 30 March 2026, three persons have resigned from four Parastatal Bodies, \nnamely – \n(i) \nMr Selvanaden Mootoosamy as Chairperson of the Sugar Industry Labour \nWelfare Fund and Board Member of the National Children’s Council; \n(ii) \nMrs Nandini Meenackshi Miniandee as Member of the National Women’s \nSports Commission, and  \n(iii) Ms Zara Noa Lennon, as Member of the National Women’s Sports \nCommission. \n• \nMadam Speaker, there have been two further resignations on 01 and 02 April \n2026, namely – \n(i) \nMrs Beebee Sherah Banu Goolfee Noormamode as Independent Member of \nthe National Women’s Council, and  \n(ii) \nMr George David Grenade, as Member of the Trust Fund for Excellence in \nSports. \nMadam Speaker, as regard to part (c) of the question, there have been six resignations \nin advisory positions in ministries, namely – \n(i) \nAmbassador Vijay Singh Makhan as Special Adviser in Diplomatic and \nInternational Trade to the former Deputy Prime Minister on the 20 March 2026; \n(ii) \nMr Kishore Kumar Pertab as Senior Adviser on Policy and Strategic Matters to \nthe former Deputy Prime Minister on 20 March 2026; \n(iii) Ms Daniella Bastien as Senior Adviser on Communication and Strategic Matters \nto the former Deputy Prime Minister; \n(iv) Mr Nabil Moolna as Adviser to the Attorney General; \n(v) \nMr Shafick Saalih Ahmad as Senior Adviser to the former Deputy Prime Minister \non 23 March 2026, and \n(vi) Mr Hishaam Ali Ibrahim as Senior Adviser on Environmental, Solid Waste \nManagement and Climate Change Matters to the Minister of Environment, Solid \nWaste Management and Climate Change on 23 March 2026.  \nIt’s a long list, yes! \nMadam Speaker: Chut ! \nThe Prime Minister: As regards part (d) of the question, three resignations have \noccurred in State-owned Enterprises, namely – \n(i) \nMr Med Doba as Board Member of the State Informatics Ltd on 23 March 2026; \n(ii) \nMr Ganesha Singaravelloo as Director, State Investment Corporation Ltd on 24 \nMarch 2026, and \n(iii) Mr Critanand Atmah as Chairperson, Mauritius Housing Company Ltd on 25 \nMarch 2026. \nIn regard to part (e) of the question, four resignations have occurred in State \nInstitutions, namely – \n(i) \nMr Kishore Pertab as Director of Economic Development Board on 23 March \n2026; \n(ii) \nMr Vishwanaden Singaravelloo as Co-opted Council Member of the National \nProductivity & Competitiveness Council on 24 March 2026; \n(iii) Mr Gerard Michel Olivier as Member of the Sports Arbitration Tribunal on 24 \nMarch 2026, and  \n(iv) Mr Louis Giovanni Bède Catherine, as Member of the Price Observatory \nCommittee whose letter was received on 30 March of this year. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr A. Duval: The hon. Prime Minister forgot to add the name Mr José Arunasalom \nwho resigned on 24 March as well and who was present in Rose Hill. \nMadam Speaker: That is not a question! You are forever angry because I am not \nstopping others.  \nMr A. Duval: No, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker: I have stopped many people today. Don’t make statements! \nMr A. Duval: Yes! The question is, Madam Speaker: is the hon. Prime Minister \nagreeable that he should, if he hasn’t done so, secure the allegiance of key people who are \nstill in post and that were close to the former Deputy Prime Minister? I will not give names; \nyou will know it better than I, but have these persons now sworn allegiance to Government, \nto yourself or are they still faithful to the former… \nMadam Speaker: I don’t think there is a need to answer that. \nMr A. Duval: There is! \nKey people in key institutions! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Do you want to answer that? \nThe Prime Minister: I can’t really answer that question but I know what he is trying to \nsay. \nMr A. Duval: So, they have? Have they sworn allegiance to… \nMadam Speaker: Don’t speak… \n(Interruptions) \nI am not sure we are still in the Chamber today. \n(Interruptions) \nSomebody is trying to speak. Yes, Mr Beechook! \nMr Beechook: Yes, Madam Speaker. Unless I have missed it, has Ambassador Perrier \nfrom Mozambique resigned or is she still in post? \nMadam Speaker: No, Mr Beechook, I can tell you; I remember. Nobody from abroad \nresigned.  \nMr A. Duval: No, but he can answer.  \nMs Anquetil : Non, il ne le sait pas.  \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, nobody including her.  \nMadam Speaker: No, but he must listen to the reply. Is that right? Nobody from \nabroad resigned? \nThe Prime Minister: Yes. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, where were we? \nMr A. Duval, have you finished with your question? \nYes. Okay, now we have got Mr Quirin.  \nIRÉVA VILLAS PROJECT – SCAM ALLEGATIONS – INQUIRIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/237",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 237,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/237) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \ninquiries initiated into the scam allegations in relation to the Iréva Villas Project of Areva \nImmobilier Ltd. and Venezis Property by real estate promoters Mr A. C. and Mr A. C. P., he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police and the Financial \nCrimes Commission, information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I presume the hon. Member is referring to two \nbrothers, I think they are twins, bearing the same initials, that is, A.C.P. \nI wish to refer him to my reply to Parliamentary Question B/1039 of the Sitting of 25 \nNovember 2025 wherein I had indicated that one Mr B.R. had, on 28 March 2023, made a \ndeclaration to the Central CID as a precautionary measure against Mr. Arvin. C.P., just to \ndistinguish them. He was the Director of Areva Immobilier Ltd to the effect that he had \nsigned a contract for the purchase of a villa forming part of the ‘Iréva Villas Project’ for the \namount of Rs8.2 million and had paid Rs5 million. Later on, Mr A.C.P. requested him to pay \nan additional Rs2.2 million out of the remaining balance of Rs3.2 million. He refused to pay \nand dropped the proposal to purchase the villa. \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Police that Police had started an enquiry into the \ncase and have recorded statements from six persons. On 13 May 2025, upon completion of \nthe enquiry, the Central CID forwarded the case file to the Office of the Director of Public \nProsecutions for advice. Thereafter, the Director of Public Prosecutions requested for several \nclarifications, which were attended by the Police.  \nOn 29 December 2025, the DPP returned the case file to the Police requesting to \nenquire into the outcome of civil cases entered by Mr B.R. against Mr A.C.P. and vice versa. \nThe case was fixed for merits before the Supreme Court on 10 March 2026. \nOn 01 April 2026, the Office of the DPP requested police to provide an update on the \noutcome of the civil cases entered by Mr. B.R. against Mr. A.C.P., who is the Director of \nAreva Immobilier Ltd and vice versa, before the Supreme Court. \nOn 03 April 2026, the Registrar of the Supreme Court informed the Police that Mr. \nB.R. and Areva Immobilier Ltd had on 10 March 2026 agreed before the Supreme Court that \nAreva Immobilier Ltd would pay to Mr. B.R. the sum of Rs5.7 million in full and final \nsettlement before a Notary Public by 30 June of this year. Both parties jointly moved that the \nagreement be made a judgment of the Court and the motion was granted. \nFollowing these developments, the police will refer the case back to the Office of the \nDPP for advice. \nOn 25 February 2025, police had received a second complaint in connection with the \nIréva Villas project made by one Mr V.P. who had made full payment for the purchase of one \nvilla which had not yet been delivered. The police have initiated an investigation and so far, \nstatements from six persons have been recorded.  \nI am informed, Madam Speaker, by the Financial Crimes Commission that, in light of \nseveral complaints made by victims against Venezis Property, owned by Mr A.C.P. and \nAreva Immobilier Ltd, owned by the other Mr A.C.P., investigations for money laundering \nhad been initiated against these companies.  \nThe Financial Crimes Commission had in March 2025 and July 2025, following several \ncomplaints made by victims, initiated two investigations for money laundering with predicate \noffence of swindling occurring as from year 2022 against Mr A.C., owner of Venezis \nProperty and Mr A.C.P., owner of Areva Immobilier Ltd.  \nEleven victims were interviewed by the Commission and 21 statements have been \nrecorded. One person, namely Mr A.C. was arrested. Amount allegedly defraud is about Rs50 \nmillion.  \nAll deeds for the transactions bear the seals of public notaries Mr K.R. and Mr D.R. \nThese two public notaries were also interrogated and the last one being on 02 April 2026. \nThe Financial Crimes Commission is awaiting information from financial institutions to \nproceed further. \nMadam Speaker: Yes.  \nMr Quirin: Merci, madame la présidente. L’honorable Premier ministre sait-t-il qu’il y \na des cas où les acquéreurs ont déboursé presque la totalité de la somme au promoteur alors \nqu’il s’avère après évaluation que moins de 50% des travaux ont été complétés ?  \nDans ce contexte, peut-il informer la Chambre où on en est avec les amendements à la \nloi pour protéger les acquéreurs comme il avait lui-même promis dans sa réponse à ma \nquestion B/1039 en novembre dernier ? \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, we are following all this, Madam Speaker. The amendments \nwill be brought later because we have other priorities, but they will be brought.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Time is up!  \nNow, the Table has advised that the following PQs have been withdrawn: B/240, \nB/242, B/244, B/245, B/247, B/248, B/249, B/250, B/252, B/253, B/254, and B/255.  \nNow, PQ B/262 will be replied by hon. Minister of Local Government, PQ B/257 will \nbe replied by hon. Minister of Housing and Lands, PQ B/296 and B/309 will be replied by \nMinister of Tourism.  \nI think it might be wiser to break at this stage rather than start. \nYou want one question? Alright! I see, you decide.  \nYes, Dr. Ms. Daureeawo. Your question. Only one question. \nROAD CONGESTION – SURVEY – REASONS & STRATEGY ADOPTED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/238",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 238,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/238) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Police Stations, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner \nof Police and table the list thereof identified for relocation and indicate whether new ones \nwill be set up, indicating, in each case, the proposed new locations and where matters stand \nas to the setting up new ones.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that there are presently 80 Police \nStations and 15 Police Posts in Mauritius and Rodrigues. \nPolice have worked out a plan to renovate some of the buildings and to relocate others. \nIn this connection, eight Police Station projects have been identified under the Public Sector \nInvestment Programme 2025/2026 to 2029/2030, of which seven involves the construction of \nnew stations and one involves major renovation works. These stations are at Cent Gaulettes, \nPhoenix, Triolet, Goodlands, Moka, L’Escalier, Tombeau Bay and Vallée des Prêtres. \nFor the Financial Year 2025/2026, five police stations projects are being implemented \nas follows – \n(i) \nCent Gaulettes – works started on 25 August 2025; \n(ii) \nPhoenix - works started on 21 November 2025;  \n(iii) \nthe projects at Triolet and Goodlands are at design stage, and \n(iv) \nrenovation works at Tombeau Bay started on 14 January 2026. \nOf the remaining three projects under the Programme, Vallée des Prêtres Police Station \nhas already been relocated while Moka Sub-Divisional Headquarters and L’Escalier Police \nStation which are at design stage will be implemented in subsequent financial year. \nAdditionally, Police has identified seven Police Stations involving significant \nrenovation works, for which the scope of works is currently under preparation. \nThese initiatives reflect the Government’s commitment to modernising Police \ninfrastructure, improving operational capacity, and to provide conducive working \nenvironment for the Police Force. \nREPORT OF THE VARIETIES OF DEMOCRACY INSTITUTE 2026 – \nRECLASSIFICATION OF MAURITIUS – FACTORS & INDICATORS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/239",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 239,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/239) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mauritius being \nreclassified as a democracy in the Report of the Varieties of Democracy Institute 2026, he \nwill state whether a detailed comparative analysis of the factors and indicators which, \naccording to the reports thereof of the past five years highlighting the evolution of Mauritius, \nhas been carried out and, if so, indicate whether same will be laid on the Table of the \nAssembly.",
      "answer": "Reply: The Report of the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Institute 2026, which was \npublished on 17 March 2026, provides a comprehensive assessment on democracy across \ncountries worldwide, using indicators grouped into five indices, namely Electoral democracy, \nliberal democracy, participatory democracy, deliberative democracy and egalitarian \ndemocracy. \nThe information presented in the various V-Dem Reports over the past few years, \nincluding the factors and indicators used therein, has been carefully noted. In fact, the House \nmay wish to note that for the past five years, the V-Dem, in its reports, classified Mauritius as \nfollows – \n• \nIn 2021, Mauritius was in the unenviable position of being ranked among the 10 \nautocratizing countries. This was due to a sharp decline in the indicator for \nquality of elections in 2019 due to allegations of electoral fraud, complaints of \nwidespread dissemination of false information, anti-democratic measures such as \nsuspension of Parliament in 2020 and dispersion of peaceful protests. \n• \nIn 2022, Mauritius remained among the 10 autocratizing countries and the Report \nnoted that there was increased media censorship in Mauritius. \n• \nIn 2023, Mauritius was classified as a ‘Major Autocratizer’ and the Report noted, \namong others, that democracy in Mauritius was in steep decline and that, I quote, \n‘democracy seems to hang by a thread.’  \n• \nIn 2024, Mauritius was classified as a ‘Grey zone electoral autocracy’.  The \nReport underlined that Mauritius had lost its status of liberal democracy in 2014 \nand transitioned from an electoral democracy to an electoral autocracy. Mauritius \nwas cited among the worst government offenders when it came to increasing \nefforts to censor the media. Mauritius was also described as top ‘stand-alone’ \nautocratizer with the autocratization beginning from 2018.   \n• \nIn 2025, the Report noted that Mauritius could potentially be misclassified as a \n‘Grey zone electoral autocracy’ after the 2024 General elections which could \nbring a turnaround after years of autocratization. \nAfter years of democratic decline, there has finally been a welcome and well-deserved \nshift in the classification of Mauritius. According to the 2026 Report, I quote, ‘the 2024 \ngeneral elections brought a change in government and halted authoritarian transgressions.’ \nMauritius now leads the U-turn list in terms of magnitude of improvement and has \nregained its standing as an electoral democracy, after a long period of autocratization, during \nwhich the previous Government censored the media, harassed journalists and was caught \nwiretapping.   \nThis reclassification reflects improvements in key democratic indicator measures by V-\nDem, some people still think that there has been no change. There is no greater change – than \nbeing free again. \n‘Freedom of expression’ and media-related rights are fundamental human rights which \nwere most severely affected during the periods of autocratization which Mauritius faced \nunder the previous Government. Since the election of this Government, which has led to the \nre-democratization of this country, these fundamental freedoms have now been restored. \nIt is comforting to see that the efforts which have been made by this Government have \nbeen seen and acknowledged in the 2026 Report of V-Dem. As highlighted in the \nGovernment Programme 2025–2029, Government stands committed to restoring the trust of \nthe nation in independent and impartial institutions, and in reinstating the independence of \npublic institutions.  \nThe consolidation of our democracy is a continuous journey, and this Government \nremains steadfast in its commitment to advancing progress across diverse areas. We are going \nto invite international organisations to re-look at the loopholes in our system. \nHON. PAUL RAYMOND BÉRENGER – RESIGNATION – MEETING WITH PM",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/240",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 240,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/240) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the recent resignation of Honourable Paul Raymond Bérenger, GCSK, as Deputy \nPrime Minister, he will state whether he met the Honourable Member in the days prior to the \nsaid resignation and, if so, indicate the reasons put forward by the latter therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nWOMEN'S PRISON – BAGGAGE SCANNING EQUIPMENT – INSTALLATION \nSTATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/241",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 241,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/241) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nbaggage scanning equipment purchased in 2023 for the Women's Prison, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Prisons, information as to whether it \nhas been installed and, if so, indicate – \n(a) \nby whom, and \n(b) \nwhether – \n(i) \nit is operational, and \n(ii) \ntraining has been imparted to the staff operating same.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Prisons that five Baggage X-Ray \nInspection Systems were procured in 2023 for installation in the following prisons – \n(a) \nBeau Bassin Prison;  \n(b) \nNew Wing Prison; \n(c) \nWomen Prison;  \n(d) \nGrand River North West Remand Prison, and  \n(e) \nEastern High Security Prison. \nRegarding part (a) of the question, the equipment has been installed at the Women \nPrison on 13 November 2023 by the supplier, AfricaMED Ltd. \nWith regard to part (b)(i) and (ii) of the question, the equipment at the Women Prison \nbecame operational on 23 July 2025 and a training session was conducted on 08 May 2025 by \nthe supplier. One Woman Assistant Superintendent of Prisons and seven Women Prison \nOfficers/Senior Prison Officers had been trained on the operation of the equipment. \nThere was a delay in the obtention of the licence from the Radiation Safety and Nuclear \nSecurity Authority as the location of the equipment at the Women Prison was not found \nsuitable.   \nAppropriate measures were taken by the Mauritius Prison Service to ensure compliance \nwith the requirements of the Radiation Safety and Nuclear Security Authority. After obtention \nof the required licence, the system became operational on 23 July 2025. \nRODRIGUES – PLAINE CORAIL AIRPORT – NEW RUNWAY CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/242",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 242,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/242) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the project for the \nconstruction of a new runway at Plaine Corail Airport, in Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from Airports of Mauritius Co. Ltd., information as to where matters \nstand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSILVER BANK LIMITED – CONSERVATORSHIP & RECEIVERSHIP – NON-\nPERFORMING/TOXIC LOANS – DEPOSITS HELD",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/243",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 243,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floreal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/243) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floreal) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Silver Bank Limited, \nfollowing the placement thereof under conservatorship in February 2024 and in receivership \non 30 March 2026, respectively, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Bank of \nMauritius, information as to the total amount of – \n(a) \nnon-performing or toxic loans identified at the time of conservatorship, indicating \nthe amount thereof recovered during the said period from local and foreign \ncustomers, respectively, and  \n(b) \ndeposits held therewith by public bodies/institutions as at the date of the \nreceivership, giving a breakdown thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: With regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Bank of Mauritius \nthat in the first report of the Conservator submitted in March 2024, non-performing loans \nwere estimated at approximately Rs8.1 billion out of a total loan portfolio of Rs8.3 billion.  \nAs regards the amount recovered, as at date, only a relatively small amount of around \nRs209 million has been recovered since the placement of the bank under conservatorship, of \nwhich, Rs47 million from a non-resident customer and Rs162 million from resident \nborrowers. \nConcerning part (b) of the question, the deposits held by public bodies and institutions \nat Silver Bank Limited as at 28 February 2026 amounted to around Rs907 million as follows \n– \n(a) \nRs523 million by the COVID-19 Projects Development Fund; \n(b) \nRs158 million by the National Insurance Co. Ltd; \n(c) \nRs132 million by the NIC General Insurance Co. Ltd; \n(d) \nRs58 million by the Municipal Council of Curepipe, and \n(e) \nRs36 million by the Sugar Insurance Fund Board. \nPROPOSED ELECTORAL REFORMS – PUBLIC CONSULTATION \nEXERCISE – PROPOSALS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/244",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 244,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/244) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the public consultation exercise in respect of the proposed Electoral Reforms, he \nwill state the number of proposals received as at closing date, indicating – \n(a)  whether a special team or committee has been set up to consider same, and  \n(b)  the timeframe for the preparation of a summary of the main proposals and \nwhether same will be circulated prior to the drafting of any new legislation in \nrelation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nROAD ACCIDENT – CAUDANT ROUNDABOUT – HEAVY VEHICLE – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/245",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 245,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/245) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the road \naccident which occurred on Tuesday 31 March 2026 at the Caudan Roundabout, involving a \n40-tonne concrete mixer truck, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to where matters stand regarding the inquiry initiated \nthereinto, indicating whether the said vehicle was operating under a special permit or \nexemption during restricted hours and, if so, indicate the authority which granted same and \nthe conditions attached thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMIDDLE EAST TENSION – OIL PRICES VOLATILITY – VAT & LEVY \nPROPOSED REDUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/246",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 246,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/246) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the volatility of \ninternational oil prices amidst the escalation of tensions in the Middle East, he will state  \nwhether consideration will be given for temporarily reducing taxes, Value Added Tax and \nlevies on petroleum products to mitigate rising cost of living and inflationary pressures in \nMauritius  and, if not, why not and whether consideration will be given for the introduction of \na time-bound and targeted fuel tax adjustment mechanism linked to international oil price \nvolatility.",
      "answer": "Reply: The war in the Middle East has caused a considerable reduction in the global \nsupply of energy products. Based on reports from early April 2026, the war in Iran has caused \nthe largest oil supply disruption in history, surpassing the crisis of 1973 and 1979. The \nconflict has resulted in the effective blockade of the Strait of Hormuz by Iran and production \ndrops due to infrastructure damage in main oil producing countries in the region. Global oil \nsupply was projected to plunge by 8 million barrels per day in March 2026. \nNet importing countries like Mauritius are bearing the brunt of the impact of this \ndisruption.  As a result of the war, our import bill for petroleum products by the State Trading \nCorporation in March this year has increased by 82% due mostly to price increase over the \nprevious month. It is expected that the import bill will rise further by 21% in the month of \nApril 2026.  \nAs at 03 April 2026, the price per barrel of Brent oil was $109.03 compared to $72.48 \non 27 February, representing an increase of 50%.  \nThe price of oil may not have peaked yet.  As an importing nation, Mauritius faces two \nmajor risks. One, escalating prices that can further severely destabilise our macroeconomic \nfundamentals through the balance of payments, inflation and official foreign currency \nreserves. \nSecond, Mauritius faces the risk of major disruption in accessibility to energy products. \nThis is an existential issue since we are totally dependent on supply from overseas.  \nThe situation, therefore, calls for more judicious use of energy products, in particular \nstringent demand management policies.  \nAs regards the first part of the question, I wish to inform the House that there are \nalready safety nets in our tax system in particular for the manufacturing sector. Manufacturers \nusing Gas Oil in stationary engines, boilers and burners are already exempted from payment \nof excise duty. They can also recover the VAT paid on Gas Oil. \n Likewise, Fuel Oil used by CEB is not subject to excise duty and the VAT paid is \nrecovered by CEB. \nFor the public transport sector, under the Bus Company Recovery Account Scheme, a \nrefund is made on the retail price of diesel to owners of buses used for public transport to \nensure that the actual cost of diesel per litre is maintained at a subsidised price of Rs40 per \nlitre. In fact, the subsidy element has increased to Rs24.80 per litre compared to Rs18.95 \nprior to the adjustment in retail price on 25 March 2026.  \nThere are also other mechanisms in place to mitigate rising cost of living and protect \nthe population from inflationary pressures.  \nFor example, my Government has earmarked Rs2 billion for this financial year in the \nPrice Stabilisation Fund to maintain affordable prices for essential goods, namely milk, edible \noil, processed cheese, infant milk powder, canned pilchards, diapers.  \nAs from 01 February 2026, medicines relating to cardiovascular diseases, hypertension \nand diabetes are also subsidised.  \nSince March 2025, an additional 500 products are under the maximum mark-up price \ncontrol mechanism to control the maximum retail price of these products.  \nIn addition, Government is providing a subsidy of more than 50% of the cost of a 12-kg \ncylinder Liquefied Petroleum Gas. On 02 April 2026, the cost price was Rs646, thus the \nsubsidy was of Rs396.  \nGovernment is maintaining free transport for students and elderly at an annual cost of \nRs1.7 billion. \nAs regards the second part of the question, I am personally chairing a Crisis Committee \nto look into the economic and social impacts of the present conflict in the Middle East.  \nThe first meeting was held on Wednesday 01 April 2026 and a number of proposals \nhave been made by Ministers, including measures to alleviate the impact of the surge in \npetroleum prices. The proposals are being examined and will be submitted for a decision to \nCabinet. \n \nCÔTE D’OR – SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE – INCENTIVE PACKAGE –\nFINANCIAL COST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/247",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 247,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/247) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the proposed \nestablishment of a Special Economic Zone at Côte D’or, he will state the – \n(a)  proposed incentive package for prospective promoters, developers and operators \nthereof;  \n(b)  estimated financial cost thereof to Government, and  \n(c)  anticipated tangible benefits for the Mauritian economy in terms of foreign direct \ninvestment and job creation.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \nSEAPORT AND AIRPORT – BORDER CONTROL – DRUG SEIZURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/248",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 248,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/248) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to border control at the seaport and airport respectively, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to – \n(a) \nover the past three years, the number of – \n(i)  \ndrug seizures carried out thereat, and  \n(ii)  Police Officers, including officers of the Anti-Drug and Smuggling Unit, \nposted thereat allegedly involved in drug trafficking and the number thereof \nconvicted therefor as at to date, and  \n(b)  whether a profiling exercise is carried out prior to the posting of enforcement \nofficers at strategic entry points thereof, indicating the measures being envisaged \nto ensure the integrity of officers posted thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nAIR MAURITIUS LTD. – STRATEGIC PARTNER – SHORTLISTED PARTNERS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/249",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 249,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/249) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Air Mauritius Ltd., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nwhether Airport Holdings Ltd. is seeking a strategic partner therefor and, if so, where matters \nstand, indicating the names of any shortlisted partners.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO –UNITED KINGDOM & MAURITIUS AGREEMENT – \nJUDGEMENT’S CONSEQUENCES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/250",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 250,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/250) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nAgreement signed between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and \nNorthern Island and the Government of the Republic of Mauritius concerning the Chagos \nArchipelago including Diego Garcia, he will state the consequences, if any, of the judgment \ndelivered by the Supreme Court (British Indian Ocean Territory) on 31 March 2026 on the \nratification thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMIDDLE EAST CONFLICT – MAURITIAN NATIONALS – SAFETY & \nASSISTANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/251",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 251,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/251) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the recent \nescalation of conflict and prevailing tensions in the Middle East spilling over the \nneighbouring region, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the – \n (a)  number of Mauritian nationals currently present thereat, indicating whether their \nsafety has been ascertained, and  \n(b)  nature of assistance requested therefrom, if any, and the support provided thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nILLICIT TRANSACTIONS – SEIZED MOTOR VEHICLES – FINES & \nPROSECUTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/252",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 252,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/252) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to motor vehicles of retail value exceeding Rs3 million seized by the Financial Crimes \nCommission since November 2024 to date, owned, controlled or acquired by or on behalf of \npersons allegedly involved in illicit transactions, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nthe list thereof, indicating – \n(a)  the make, model and value thereof in each case, and  \n(b)  whether fines have been imposed and/or prosecutions initiated in connection \ntherewith, indicating whether car dealers and leasing companies are involved \ntherein.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD – DEPUTY CEO (MR S.M.) – \nAPPOINTMENT & CONTRACT RENEWAL",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/253",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 253,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/253) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mr. S. M., Deputy \nChief Executive Officer of the Economic Development Board, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to – \n (a)  his date of appointment and the terms and conditions thereof, and \n (b)  the circumstances under which his contract was renewed, indicating the terms and \nconditions of his new contract.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nDIRECTOR OF AUDIT REPORT 2024-2025 – PERFORMANCE-BASED \nBUDGETING – ASSESSMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/254",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 254,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/254) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Director of Audit Report for financial year 2024-2025, he will state whether an \nassessment of the content thereof has been carried out and, if so, indicate the – \n(a) \ncorrective measures being envisaged in relation thereto, and  \n(b)  how the introduction of Performance-Based Budgeting is expected to help redress \nthe situation.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSDDS+ STATUS – MEASURES & ECONOMIC BENEFITS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/255",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 255,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/255) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nupgrading of Mauritius to the Special Data Dissemination Standard Plus (SDDS+) status by \nthe International Monetary Fund, he will state the – \n(a)   measures taken by Government that led thereto, and  \n(b)  key benefits associated therewith, particularly, in terms of access to financing, \ninvestment prospects and economic resilience.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBASIC RETIREMENT PENSION – SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT –\nVULNERABLE GROUPS IMPACT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/256",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 256,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floréal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/256) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the increase in the \neligibility age to benefit from the Basic Retirement Pension, he will state whether, in the \ncontext of the preparation of the forthcoming Budget, his Ministry has carried out any study \nor socio-economic impact assessment of the effects thereof on vulnerable groups, including \nlow-income earners and, if so, indicate the main findings and conclusions thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSTATE SECONDARY SCHOOLS – STUDENT POPULATION BELOW 150 – \nSTAFFING DETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/257",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 257,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/257) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to road congestion, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Road Development Authority, \ninformation as to whether a study has been carried out to identify the reasons thereof and, if \nso, indicate the outcome thereof and the road decongestion strategy put in place.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Madam Speaker, road congestion remains a persistent challenge. As the \nHouse is aware, Mauritius has inherited a colonial era road network which was designed to \nsatisfy the transport needs of that time and is not adapted to meet modern engineering \nstandards or to cater for the current traffic volumes. The network comprises motorways, main \nroads, A and B roads and secondary roads.  \nOver the years, the road network has been progressively upgraded to international \nstandards, which includes the development of new motorway infrastructure with four to six \nlanes. Our current road network now spans over 3000 km with approximately 1300 km being \nclassified roads.  \nNotwithstanding these improvements, there has been a significant increase in the \nnumber of vehicles on our roads. This high concentration of vehicles has contributed to \ncongestion across the island.  \nI am informed that with a view to addressing road congestion, the Road Development \nAuthority is implementing a series of measures which include – \n1. \nThe construction of link roads and bypasses; \n2. \nJunction improvements, and  \n3. \nThe provision of additional lanes across motorways. \nMoreover, to alleviate congestion at specific locations, the RDA is currently \nimplementing short term measures including the following – \n1. \nSlip lane at Nalletamby and St- Paul Roads; \n2. \nWorks along the A20-B70 Link Road at La Brasserie;  \n3. \nSlip lane at Côte d'Or along Motorway M3;  \n4. \nProposed slip lane at Ripailles along Motorway M3; \n5. \nProposed strengthening works along Motorway M1, and \n6. \nProposed construction of flyovers at Camp Fouquereaux and La Vigie.  \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed by the RDA that with a view to supporting \nsustainable development of the island by providing safe and fast connectivity to all parts of \nthe country as well as addressing traffic congestion, the RDA has been preparing a New \nStrategic Road Network Masterplan in consultation with relevant stakeholders. This forward-\nlooking Masterplan aims to address both current and future traffic demands and will guide the \ndevelopment of the transport infrastructure over the coming decades. \nThe Masterplan encompasses major projects such as Motorway M4, Ring Road Phases \nII and III, the Dubreuil-Melrose Link Road, the Calebasses-Arsenal-Solitude Link Road, the \nTamarin Bypass and the Motorway M5 from the airport to Chemin Grenier amongst others.  \nMadam Speaker, the Congestion Management Strategy goes beyond building new \nroads infrastructure and encompasses a wider set of transport measures. Achieving \nsustainable mobility requires actions such as better traffic management and stronger public \ntransport systems.  \nThis masterplan aims to modernise connectivity, address road congestion and support \nsustainable growth. Upon finalisation, the approval of government will be sought for the \nimplementation of the new Strategic Road Network Masterplan, which is expected to shape \nour long-term mobility landscape. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Can the hon. Minister provide the timeline for implementation of \nthe masterplan? \nMr Gunness: We are working on the masterplan, and I think it will go to the Cabinet in \nthe near future. But the implementation will take time. As you know, all road infrastructure \nprojects involve heavy investment. And we know in which economic situation the country is \nfaced with right now.  \nBut, at least, for the M4 Project, with the help/aid of the Indian Government, we are \ngoing to start it in the coming months. Probably by July or August, we will start with the \nproject from Forbach to Bel Air. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, do you have one more? \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Yes, one more.  \nCan the hon. Minister provide data or information on the improvement in the traffic \nflow resulting from the effectiveness of strategies already in place? \nMr Gunness: I have said in my answer that while we are working on road projects, at \nthe same time, we are also working on mitigation measures, short quick-wins projects, where \nwe can solve lay-bys and get slip lanes. We are working on these small projects which can be \na quick-win. For example, on the highway, at Ripailles, we have a slip lane. At Nalletamby, \nnear Meteo, we will be having a slip lane. These will, at least, mitigate the congestion \nproblem. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. François!  \nMr François: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister whether the \nRDA signed any MoU with the Regional Assembly as regards to technical expertise \ncollaboration for road development to avoid future congestion and to look into sharing of \nknowledge in Rodrigues? \nMr Gunness: Yes, we had an MoU. I recall when I was there in August, last year, we \nsigned the MoU with the Regional Assembly and the RDA. Just to inform you, the project of \nthe bridge at Mourouk will be undertaken. We have transferred it to the RDA so that it does \nthat project. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Hon. Dr. Ms Daureeawoo! Then, hon. Dr. Prayag. Then, we \nbreak. \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Could the hon. Minister state what budgetary allocations have \nbeen made for the said project? \nMr Gunness: You mean for the M4? If for the M4, it is a budgetary provision of \nRs10.8 billion. It will be provided by the Indian Government in the form of grant and line of \ncredit. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Prayag! \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Could the hon. Minister please consider to \nclassify roads that were under the purview of the local government in the past, which are \nmore congested than before, and take them under his Ministry, under the RDA, so that we can \nat least have bigger amount of budgeting for those roads? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister! \nMr Gunness: Yes. Every year, we are taking a few roads from non-classified to \nclassified. You have one from your constituency, Beau Plateau Road, I think, which will \nbecome a classified road. We are also working on a plan so that the RDA becomes the \nhighway authority. But this will require the approval of government, Cabinet and everything \nso that the RDA can become the authority which looks after all the road networks. Actually, \nnon-classified roads are taken care by the local authorities, and classified roads by RDA and \nsome by NDU. So, we have to put some order in that. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much, everyone.  \nNow, I suspend the Sitting for one and a half hour. We will come back at 2.30 p.m. \nAt 1.00 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.36 p.m., with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMINOR F. A. – HOSPITALISATION – MEDICAL CONDITIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/258",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 258,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/258) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to \nminor F. A., admitted to the Brown Sequard Hospital and subsequently transferred to the Dr. \nA.G. Jeetoo Hospital, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Child \nDevelopment Unit, information as to the –  \n(a) \nname of the shelter of which he was an inmate; \n(b) \nreasons for the hospitalization, and \n(c) \nmedical conditions thereof.",
      "answer": "Ms Navarre-Marie: Madam Speaker, minor F. A. was an inmate of SOS Children’s \nVillage Bambous. He absconded and was found safe on 17 October 2025. On 23 November \n2025, he was admitted at Brown Sequard Mental Health Care Centre. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that the minor had been displaying a pattern of \nbehavioral concerns and absconding tendencies. He first absconded from a Residential Care \nInstitution of Cap Malhereux on 05 May 2024 and was found safe the following day. \nHe was conveyed to the Dr. A.G. Jeetoo Hospital where he was admitted. \nSubsequently, the maternal grandmother in the presence of the minor’s godmother expressed \nher willingness to accommodate the minor at her residence. On 13 June 2024, the minor was \ndischarged from Dr. A.G. Jeetoo Hospital to the care of the maternal grandmother after all the \npsychological assessment and necessary enquiry were effected. \nOn 14 August 2024, minor F. A was admitted to Dr A.G. Jeetoo Hospital as he started \nto display signs of anxiety, hallucination and aggressiveness and it was difficult for the \ngrandmother to handle him. \nOn 03 October 2024, the minor was placed at Residential Care Institution of Cap \nMalhereux. On 07 October 2024, the minor absconded from the Residential Care Institution \nand an OB was entered, bearing will OB Number 3687/24. \nOn 13 November 2024, officers of my Ministry were informed by the biological mother \nof the minor that the minor might have been seen loitering in the region of Cité la Cure. On \nthe same day, the minor was found safe and was conveyed to Dr A.G. Jeetoo Hospital. \nOn 13 January 2025, the minor was placed at Residential Care Institution of Cap \nMalhereux. However, on 16 January 2025, the minor was admitted to SSR National Hospital \nfor medical issues. \nOn 10 February 2025, the minor was accommodated at SOS Children’s Village of \nBambous Residential Care Institution. On 23 November 2025, the minor was admitted to the \nBrown Sequard Mental Health Care Centre for behavioral issues and was medically \ndischarged on 01 December 2025. \nAs regard part (b) of the question, on 16 March 2026, following ingestion of metal \nbolts, minor was transferred from BSH to Dr. A.G. Jeetoo Hospital for appropriate medical \ncare. \nConcerning part (c) of the question, I am informed by the Ministry of Health and \nWellness that the minor’s health is stable. As at today, the minor has not yet been medically \ndischarged. \nMadam Speaker, on 17 and 25 March 2026, visits were conducted at Dr. A.G. Jeetoo \nHospital by officers of my Ministry for assessment purposes as well as to provide the minor \nsupport and counselling and enquiring about his health conditions. \nThis case is being followed up and regular contacts are being maintained with the \nmedical staff of the hospital. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \nMs Savabaddy: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Je remercie l’honorable ministre pour la \nréponse. L’honorable ministre peut-elle nous dire jusqu’à quand va perdurer ce système \nd’hospitalisation qui rend prisonnier des enfants innocents qui les détruise petit à petit entre \nshelters, BSH et hôpital ? \nMadame la présidente, mais il ne s’agit pas là de réparer un tuyau ou d’asphaltage \nd’une rue mais il s’agit de la vie d’un être humain et d’un innocent. Merci. \nMadam Speaker: Cela, c’était un statement ! \nMs Navarre-Marie: C’est ça, je n’ai pas très bien compris la question, Madame la \nprésidente. \nMadam Speaker: La question c’est quand est-ce que ce calvaire va s’arrêter ? \nMs Savabaddy: Je reformule la question. \nMadam Speaker: Non, ce n’est pas nécessaire. C’était clair. C’est la deuxième partie \nqui n’était pas nécessaire. \nMs Savabaddy: J’ai une deuxième question. \nMadam Speaker: Non, mais ! Allez ! Reformulez votre première question. \nMs Navarre-Marie: Madame la présidente, laissez-moi informer la Chambre que cette \nquestion d’hospitalisation de longue durée des enfants nous préoccupe également. C’est \npourquoi nous avons jugé bon de mettre sur pieds un comité coprésidé par mon collègue, \nl’Attorney General et moi-même pour revoir toute la question d’hospitalisation des enfants et \nsurtout les enfants avec des comportements difficiles. \nDans ce comité, nous avons plusieurs stakeholders, nous avons les membres du SLO, \nnous avons le DPP qui est présent. Nous avons également deux membres de cette Assemblée, \nen occurrence la Chief Whip, l’honorable Ms Anquetil et l’honorable Dr.  Ms Thannoo qui \nfont partie de ce comité. \nIl y a également les Probation Officers pour revoir toute la situation concernant \nl’hospitalisation des enfants à l’hôpital Dr. A.G. Jeetoo, dans les hôpitaux régionaux de \nmême que l’hôpital Brown Sequard. \nJe sais également que mon collègue, l’honorable ministre de la Santé a déjà proposé à \nun de ses comité qu’un ward, un dedicated ward soit aménagé dans un ward à l’hôpital de \nFlacq pour, justement, que les enfants en difficultés puissent être admis. \nJe comprends l’inquiétude des honorables membres. Moi aussi, je suis inquiète parce \nque ces enfants-là ne peuvent pas aller à l’école. C’est une question que nous avons prise \navec mon collègue, l’honorable ministre de l’Éducation, qui est en train de voir comment est-\nce que ces enfants-là puissent continuer leur scolarité tout en étant à l’hôpital. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, second question. \nMs Savabaddy: L’honorable ministre conviendra-t-elle avec moi que c’est un énième \néchec de la CDU et des shelters du ministère. Qu’est-ce qui sera fait pour changer cette \nsituation ? Madame la ministre, je suis tout à fait d’accord avec votre question – on parle du \nchangement. Cela fait presque un an et demi depuis que nous sommes au pouvoir. Je pense \nqu’il est normal que nous soyons impatients. \nMadam Speaker : Ne maltraitez pas le micro quand même. \nMs Navarre-Marie: Madame la présidente, je ne comprends pas pourquoi l’honorable \nmembre parle d’échec parce que quand on parle de cet enfant qui est dans cette question-là – \nla question qui a été posée par vous-même. L’enfant est toujours sous la charge de l’hôpital \nparce que l’enfant n’a pas eu sa décharge. \nDès que l’enfant aie sa décharge de l’hôpital, bien sûr qu’on fera le nécessaire pour lui \ntrouver soit une famille d’accueil ou alors un shelter ou bien pourquoi ne pas réintégrer \nl’enfant dans sa famille biologique du moment qu’on est satisfait que l’environnement soit \napproprié. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Hon. Chief Whip and then hon. Ramkalawon. \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. La ministre peut-elle indiquer à \nla Chambre si un officier de son ministère pourrait, en attendant les recommandations – on \nsait que cela va prendre du temps et tout – être au chevet de ce mineur pendant le reste de son \nhospitalisation étant donné que ce mineur est sous la responsabilité de son ministère ?  \nMadam Speaker: Au chevet de… \nMs Anquetil: Merci ! \nMadam Speaker: Vous comprenez… \nMs Anquetil: Pendant l’hospitalisation. L’enfant est à l’hôpital. \nMadam Speaker: Tout le temps ? Non, au chevet cela veut dire quoi ? Dites-lui avant. \nMs Anquetil: Au chevet, bon, c’est une expression française. \nMadam Speaker: Oui ? \nMs Anquetil: Qui veut dire attended. Un enfant attended par un officer de son \nministère. \nMadam Speaker: 24 heures sur 24 ? \nMs Navarre-Marie: Madame la présidente, il y a déjà les infirmiers, les infirmières qui \ns’occupent de tous les enfants à l’hôpital. Mais, il y a les officiers du ministère qui rendent \nvisite de temps à autre aux enfants hospitalisés. \nMadam Speaker: Non, mais je n’ai pas compris, excusez-moi. Je ne vais pas faire \ncomme le 09 décembre, ne vous inquiétez pas. Je n’ai pas compris le ‘au chevet’. Cela \nimplique quoi ? Je sais ce que cela veut dire au chevet. Au chevet cela veut dire s’asseoir \navec tout le temps, 24 heures sur 24. \nMs Anquetil: C’est un enfant… \nMadam Speaker: C’est cela ? Donc vous, vous êtes en train de dire cela et la ministre \nrépond qu’il n’y a pas des gens du ministère, mais… \nMs Navarre-Marie: Il y a déjà les infirmiers, les infirmières qui s’occupent des enfants \n24 sur 24 à l’hôpital, mais il y a les officiers du ministère qui rendent visite pendant les \nheures de visite à ces enfants-là. \nMs Savabaddy: Madame la présidente, une dernière question ! \nMadam Speaker: Non, non, j’ai déjà alloué une question à l’honorable Ramkalawon. \nMs Savabaddy: Après? \nMadam Speaker: Bien sûr ! \nMr Ramkalawon: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I would just like to ask the Minister \nwhether she can reinforce the Monitoring Committee, that is, those officers who visit the \nhospital because during my visit on Sunday itself, doctors stated that for days, one kid has not \nbeen visited by any officer, please? Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Voilà ! Okay? \nMs Navarre-Marie: Merci, M. l’honorable membre. M. le député, je vais m’en \nenquérir et voir de quoi il en est exactement. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nMs Savabaddy: Une toute dernière question, merci, M. la présidente. De ce que vient \ntout juste de dire la ministre, que les enfants sont sous surveillance 24 sur 24 à l’hôpital, \ncomment se fait-il que ce jeune homme de 16 ans, F. A., admis à l’hôpital, ait avalé un \nmorceau de métal ? Merci. \nMadam Speaker: D’abord, est-ce que vous êtes au courant ? \nAn hon. Member: Il avait avalé un morceau de métal. \nMadam Speaker: Avaler un morceau de métal, oui ? \nMs Savabaddy: Il est surveillé 24 sur 24. \nMs Navarre-Marie: Non, mais ce n’était pas à l’hôpital qu’il a pris ce… \nMs Savabaddy: À BSH pour aller à Jeetoo après. \nMadam Speaker: Laissez la ministre répondre. \nMs Navarre-Marie: Comment ? \nMs Savabaddy: C’est à BSH qu’il a avalé ce morceau de métal, puis il a été transféré à \nl’hôpital Jeetoo où il se retrouve actuellement. Merci. \nMs Navarre-Marie: Je pense que cette question-là aurait dû être adressée au ministre \nde la Santé. \nMs Savabaddy: Mais l’enfant est sous votre ministère ! \nMs Navarre-Marie: Brown Sequard ! \nMs Savabaddy: Mais un enfant… Pa kav koze ? Enn zenfan ki dan CDU… \nMadam Speaker: On ne parle pas ! Madame la ministre, essayez de répondre à la \nquestion. C’est quelque chose d’important. Essayez de répondre ! \nMs Navarre-Marie: Madame la présidente, cet enfant est sous la charge de l’hôpital \nBrown Sequard. Donc, c’est l’hôpital, donc l’officier du ministère ne peut pas être 24 heures \nsur 24 à encadrer cet enfant-là. Il y a déjà le corps médical qui s’occupe de l’enfant. Les \nofficiers du ministère entrent en jeu pendant les heures de visite ! \nMadam Speaker: Okay, moi je ne dis plus rien. Moi évidemment j’ai mes idées. Fini ?  \nOkay, on reviendra là-dessus peut-être à une autre occasion. Okay, hon. Caserne, yes? \nCOOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT UNIT – PROMOTION & DEVELOPMENT \nSCHEMES – BENEFICIARIES – FUNDS DISBURSED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/259",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 259,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives",
      "question": "(No. B/259) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives whether, in regard to the \nCooperatives Sector, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Cooperative \nDevelopment Unit, information as to the schemes available for the promotion and \ndevelopment thereof, indicating the list of beneficiaries thereunder and the quantum of funds \ndisbursed in each case.",
      "answer": "Mr Ameer Meea: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Member for his question. \nMadam Speaker, the cooperatives sector remains an important pillar of our economic \nfabric. It promotes collective entrepreneurship, supports livelihoods and contributes to \neconomic activity in areas such as agriculture, agro-processing, retail and services.  \nMadam Speaker, the Cooperatives Division provides a number of schemes to promote \nand support the development of cooperative societies. These schemes are geared towards \nincreasing productive capacity, supporting modernisation, encouraging sustainable practices \nand improving the operational efficiency of cooperatives. The schemes available for the \nFinancial Year 2024-2025 were as follows – \n• \nThe Boost to Local Production Scheme; \n• \nThe Livestock Farming Scheme; \n• \nThe Seedlings Production Scheme; \n• \nThe Zero Budget Natural Farming Scheme; \n• \nThe Digitalisation Scheme, and \n• \nThe Waste Recycling Scheme. \nThese schemes are aligned with Government’s objective of strengthening local \nproduction, supporting food security, improving access to quality planting materials, \npromoting livestock farming, encouraging environmentally sustainable activities, and helping \ncooperative societies adopt more efficient and modern operating practices. \nMadam Speaker, since I assumed office, I have led particular emphasis on stronger \noversight, better discipline in the management of public funds and stricter compliance in the \ndisbursement process. In line with the recommendation of the National Audit Office’s report \nfor the financial years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, my Ministry has put in place reinforced \ncontrol mechanisms. A Project Steering Committee chaired by the Permanent Secretary of the \nCooperatives Division has been set up. A Monitoring Committee chaired by the Ag. Secretary \nfor Cooperative Development has also been set up to oversee compliance with the terms and \nconditions of the schemes before any disbursement is effected. In addition, a Technical \nEvaluation Committee has been set up to assess the eligibility of applications prior to the \nrelease of funds. \nMadam Speaker, for the Financial Year 2024-2025, following the recommendation of \nthe Technical Evaluation Committee, disbursements were effected to 18 beneficiary \ncooperative societies under the Boost to Local Production Scheme, the Livestock Farming \nScheme and Digitalisation Scheme amounting to Rs3.5 million, Rs600,000 and Rs123,000 \nrespectively. Regarding the remaining schemes, namely; the Seedling Production Scheme and \nthe Waste Recycling Scheme, appropriate clearances have not been received by the \ncooperative societies for the requested development. Hence, no disbursement has been \neffected.  \nFor the Financial Year 2025-2026, the Cooperatives Division is implementing – \n• \nthe Boost to Local Production Scheme; \n• \nthe Seedling Production Scheme; \n• \nthe Livestock Farming Scheme; \n• \nthe Zero Budget Natural Farming Scheme; \n• \nthe Digitalisation Scheme, and  \n• \nas a new measure, the Energy Efficiency Scheme for Cooperative Societies. \nThe schemes were launched on 27 November 2025. The initial closing date of 13 \nJanuary 2026 was extended to 30 January 2026. A total of 53 applications was received. As at \ndate, the Technical Evaluation Committee has met on two occasions to assess the \napplications. The evaluation exercise is ongoing, disbursements will be effected once the \nproject is implemented by the Cooperatives Society and the latter applies for refund to my \nMinistry. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? Okay, hon. Chief Whip! \nTRANSITIONAL HOUSING – COMPREHENSIVE NATIONAL POLICY \nFRAMEWORK",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/260",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 260,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Land Use Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/260) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Land Use Planning whether, in regard to transitional \nhousing, he will state whether his Ministry has put in place a comprehensive national policy \nframework to govern same and, if so, give details thereof and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I thank the hon. Member for the question \nwhich once again gives me the opportunity to explain this issue about maison de transition \nand I must admit, it seems as though it has caught the attention of many and for good reasons. \nThere was clearly un vide and this is precisely what we are endeavouring to correct. Et il est \nun fait que je me suis senti interpellé depuis un long moment by the fact that many people \nfound themselves without homes, without a roof over their heads for various reasons. \nSo, fate has it now that I am in a position that at least, even though I had taken note of \nthis, I am now in a position to change it, and this is precisely what I have started to do. And I \ndo not want to miss that opportunity to make use of this office for such a positive deed.  \nI have already apprised Cabinet of my intention to come forward with the \nimplementation of these maisons de transition, and it will, basically, consist of modular \nexpandable housing units made out of metal structures. Some people even refer to them as \nexpandable container homes. They will be built on plots of land, State land, where utility \nservices are available.  \nI have mentioned this in this august Assembly at the Sitting of 31 March 2026. This \nproject concerns two other Ministries: the Ministry of Social Integration, Social Security and \nNational Solidarity and that of Gender Equality and Family Welfare. I clearly would like to \nunderline, once again, that I propose to meet with my two colleagues in order to coming \nforward with the policy framework. Concurrently, the Ministry of Finance is also being kept \nin the picture. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \nMs Anquetil: Merci, Madame la présidente. \nCan the Minister outline the main challenges that could be encountered in \nimplementing transitional housing initiatives? Thank you. \nMr Mohamed: I think this is a very good question. There are quite a few challenges, I \nmust admit. I mean, the first thing that comes to mind, obviously, is money. That is one of the \nfirst challenges that all of us have to face when it comes to any such project.  \nHowever, there are priorities in life, and one of the priorities of this government is to \nhave roofs over people’s head, for those who do not have a roof. So, obviously, this is a \npriority. Now, we have to ensure that it is a project that sees the light of day. \nAnother challenge that we face is also to find the appropriate plot of land. To find that \nappropriate plot of land, there is an exercise that is being carried out by officers of my \nMinistry and that of NHDC. The objective of that exercise is to identify the appropriate sites \ngeotechnically, close to amenities and to transport. We do not want to be faced with problems \nsuch as no water, no waste, etc. So, therefore, it would be a situation where it is a plug and \nplay, where the house is put there and the solution is there for everyone to utilise. \nBut the third issue which we do have as well is that who are those who will have access \nto those homes. That is the reason why I will be working closely with my two colleagues \nfrom the two other Ministries in order to come up with a policy framework. Some have \nsuggested that all people should be allowed to have access to those homes.  \nAs I said, Madam Speaker, this is a maison de transition, and what I understand it to be \nit, is it is an emergency home for an emergency situation. So, therefore, I would not want to \nuse the right term, which is “a halfway home”. The halfway home is more specifically for \nthose who come out from prison at a certain point in time or need a temporary home as a \nhalfway measure, etc. This is specifically used for probation issues. I know what I am talking \nabout. So, I do not want to use that term.  \nI would say that those are homes that would be used temporarily, for a certain time, and \nthe authorities, ministries and agencies, will have to accompany those people who are \nqualified to be there, to go to a permanent home. So, this is going to be a transition. There are \nmany challenges. \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Puis-je savoir du ministre si les \nvictimes de violence domestique, ainsi que les ex-détenus, pourront bénéficier de ce dispositif \ndu logement transitoire ? Merci. \nMr Mohamed: It is an interesting point. I do not want to pronounce myself on this at \nthis particular juncture. It will be for my colleagues, together with my Ministry, and finally \nfor the Cabinet to decide who will be those who will have access to those homes.  \nNow, if it were in ideal world, then, everyone should have access to all facilities. But \nwe have to ensure we use best practice of various other jurisdictions, that is, what is done in \nthe OECD countries, in countries that neighbour Mauritius, such as South Africa, or what is \ndone in Australia and in other countries. We will use best practice. \nBut then, again, I would love to be able to go faster because, right now, it is only a \ntheory. We would like to see it implemented. We have found two plots of land, one in Palma \nand one in Constituency No. 4. \nMs Anquetil: In Palma? \nMr Mohamed: Yes. \nMs Savabaddy: St. Croix! \nMr Mohamed: Yes. It is not because we have those two hon. Members who are from \nthere. It is just a coincidence. It just happens to be the case, apart from the fact that they have \nbeen ensuring that we find solutions. Those are the two plots of land that have been found, \nand we are finalising the analysis of the suitability. But it looks like it could be there. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, your last question! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. \nWill the hon. Minister state whether budgetary provisions will be made for transitional \nhousing in the next financial year?  \nEn tout cas, bravo au ministre pour cette belle initiative réfléchie, qui permettra aux \npersonnes vulnérables de retrouver stabilité et dignité. Merci. \nMr Mohamed: If only I knew! Let me say one thing. There are projects that are urgent. \nThere are those that are less urgent than others. So, obviously, I will have to go and submit \nbefore those responsible to ensure that we get the necessary budget. But this is a very \nimportant project. I will also be calling upon the private sector if ever there is a défaillance in \nthat effect. We will find solutions. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \nMr Seeburn: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can I ask the hon. Minister if he can \nenlighten the House on whether this transitional housing would also be extended to other \nconstituencies, in particular Constituency No. 11, being given that the housing project in \nConstituency No. 11 has now come to a hold? Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: I thought it was quite clear. \nMr Mohamed: When I am talking about one project of transitional home, I am not \ntalking about a hundred houses. I am not talking about huge number of houses. We are \ntalking about maybe the possibility of having, at least, 15-20 houses in a locality. So, the \nintention is, yes, to be able to have this bank of houses for transitional purposes in many areas \nof Mauritius. If we could start with those two places and then gradually move to other areas \nof Mauritius, that would be the best-case scenario. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Seeburn. \nGRAND SABLE FOOTBALL GROUND – LIGHTING FACILITIES –\nIMPLEMENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/261",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 261,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/261) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the project for the installation \nof lighting facilities at the football ground of Grand Sable, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the District Council of Grand Port, information as to the expected date of \nimplementation thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the football ground at Grand Sable \nis presently not equipped with lighting facilities.  \nFollowing my reply to PQ B/764 on 27 July 2025, the District Council of Grand Port \nwas requested to submit a detailed funding application, estimated at approximately Rs4 \nmillion, for the implementation of the project. \nI am informed that while the project has been proposed under successive budget \nexercises, namely 2024-2025 and 2025-2026, it could not be implemented due to other \npriorities and non-availability of funds.  \nAt present, no specific provisions are available under the district council’s approved \nbudget for the execution of the project. However, the project has already been included in the \nlist of proposed Capital Projects under the Small Community Projects Programme for the \nfinancial year 2026-2027. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to further inform the House that under the existing framework \nof cooperation, a sum has been earmarked per constituency under the Indian Grant Assistance \nfor Small Community Projects. This mechanism provides an appropriate and dedicated \navenue through which priority community-based infrastructure projects, including the \ninstallation of lighting facilities at Grand Sable Football Ground may be financed and \nimplemented.  \nIn this context, the hon. Member may wish to liaise with his two colleagues of his \nConstituency and ensure that this specific project is duly prioritised and formally included \nwithin the list of projects submitted under the Indian Grant Programme so that the necessary \nfunding can be secured and mobilised in a timely manner. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \nMr Seeburn: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Minister also consider \nproviding financial assistance in the forthcoming budget with regards to the football pitch \nalong the coastal region including football pitch at Bambous Virieux and Bois des \nAmourettes being given that we are relentlessly campaigning to attract the youth to engage \ninto sport facilities while combatting the drug proliferation problem in Mauritius? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister! \nMr Woochit: Yes, Madam Speaker. Following the PQ B/764 which was put on 22 July \n2025, this request has already been examined and has already been proposed in the next \nFinancial Year 2026-2027. I have to say that it depends on the priorities and subject to \navailability of funds, again. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Beejan! \nANSE LA RAIE PUBLIC BEACH – TRAFFIC CONGESTION – ROAD WIDENING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/262",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 262,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/262) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the Anse la Raie public beach \nnear the Youth Centre, he will state whether consideration will be given for the widening of \nthe existing lateral road and construction of an alternative road leading thereto to avert traffic \ncongestion thereat, especially, during the Ganesh Chaturthi celebrations.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Local Government (Mr R. Woochit): Madam Speaker, with your \npermission, I shall reply to PQ B/262. \nI wish to inform the House that the existing lateral access road leading to Anse la Raie \npublic beach measures approximately 475 metres in length and 6 metres in width. With \nregard to the proposed widening on this road, I am informed that such an undertaking would \nrequire the acquisition of a minimum strip of approximately two metres along the existing \nalignment. The road is presently bounded by six plots of land on either side, comprising two \nstate land portion, one privately owned plot, several plots with unidentified ownership. In this \ncontext, any land acquisition process would be complexed, time consuming and subject to \nstatutory procedures. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to emphasise that no formal request petition or representation \nhas been received at the level of the Village Council, the District Council or my Ministry \nfrom residents, land owners or elected councillors regarding the enlargement of this access \nroute according to the Chief Executive of the Council. \nAs regards financial implications, the estimated cost of the project including land \nacquisition, road construction and associated infrastructure such as road marking, lighting is \naround Rs17 million. \nHowever, the District Council currently has a provision of only Rs3.4 million \nearmarked for general road rehabilitation works across its villages and is, therefore, not in a \nposition to undertake such a project at this stage. At present, no specific provision exists \nunder the District Council approved budget for the execution of this project. \nMadam Speaker, with respect to the construction of an alternative access road to \nalleviate traffic congestion, particularly during festive period, I am informed that a detailed \nland survey and feasibility access would first need to be carried out to determine the most \nappropriate alignment. This would equally entail additional land acquisition and significant \nfinancial resources. \nMadam Speaker, notwithstanding these constraints Government remain committed to \nimproving public access infrastructure. In this regard, I wish to inform the House that \nfollowing the request of the hon. Member, the project has already been included in the list of \nproposed capital project under the small community project programme for the Financial \nYear 2026-2027 and will be considered accordingly subject to priority and availability of \nfund. \nMoreover, I am informed that the National Development Unit has funding for road \nrehabilitation programme and the project may, where appropriate, be referred for \nconsideration under this scheme as well. Accordingly, implementation of the project will be \nsubject to availability of fund, completion of required surveys and compliance with all \nprocedures including land acquisition. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Beejan! \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Will the hon. Minister arrange for a site visit \nwith all stakeholders, including Mauri-Facilities, so that we can ensure well in advance that \nclearing and lopping works are carried out in a timely manner? Thank you. \nMr Woochit: Yes, Madam Speaker. I am agreeable. My Ministry will liaise with all the \nDistrict Councils and Mauri-Facilities. But I think that the District Council is enough because \nwith the recent recruitment that we have, we can do it in house, with in-house labour. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, the hon. François! \nRODRIGUES – MULTI-USE GAMES AREA INFRASTRUCTURE – \nCONSTRUCTION & COST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/263",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 263,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François) To ask Minister of Youth and Sports – Whether, in regard to the Multi-Use Games Area infrastructure, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Sports Council, information as to (a) the number thereof constructed in Rodrigues Island to date, indicating the total cost thereof and (b) whether consideration will be given for the construction of two additional ones in the central and eastern regions of Rodrigues?",
      "addressed_to": "",
      "question": "(No. B/263) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nYouth and Sports whether, in regard to the Multi-Use Games Area infrastructure, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Sports Council, information as to – \n(a)  the number thereof constructed in Rodrigues Island to date, indicating the total \ncost thereof, and  \n(b)  whether consideration will be given for the construction of two additional ones in \nthe central and eastern regions of Rodrigues.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Madam Speaker, the Multi-Use Games Area is a community based-\nfund and fitness programme initiated by the Mauritius Telecom Foundation with the objective \nof promoting healthy living through physical activity and education for all segment of the \npopulation. This was part of each Corporate Social Responsibility activities. There are 13 \nsuch facilities and these have progressively been handed over to the Mauritius Sports Council \nfor the management and operation. \nThe final handing over for the 13 MUGAs has just been completed on the 18 March \n2026. As regard Rodrigues, I am informed by the MTF that the sport infrastructure similar to \nthe MUGA concept has been constructed by the latter at Baie du Nord in May 2025, for a \ntotal cost of around Rs9.5 million. It is known as Baie du Nord Sports Complex and is \nmanaged by the Rodrigues Regional Assembly. \nAs regard to part (b) of the question, there is no plan for the construction of two \nMUGAs by my Ministry in the central and eastern region of Rodrigues. The possibility of \nhaving two additional facilities in Rodrigues as part of the MTF-CSR activities rests with the \nlatter and the RRA may engage with them to secure such facilities. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! Alright, good! \nMs Anquetil! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 18 – WASTEWATER CONNECTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/264",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 264,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/264) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to wastewater \nconnections in Constituency No. 18, Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Wastewater Management Authority, information as to where \nmatters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: Madame la présidente, la WMA m'informe que les projets de tout-à-\nl’égout de la circonscription no. 18 concernent principalement les communes de Belle Rose, \nQuatre Bornes, La Source, Palma et Bassin, qui font partie du vaste projet d'assainissement \ndes Plaines Wilhems. Ce grand projet a été lancé en 2000 afin de protéger la principale nappe \nphréatique de la région de Plaines Wilhems contre la pollution par les eaux usées issues des \nactivités domestiques et industrielles. \nDans le cadre de ce projet, les habitants de Belle Rose et de Quatre Bornes ont été \nraccordés au réseau d’égouts public dans le cadre des deux contrats d’assainissement suivants \n– \n(i)  \nProjet d'assainissement de Plaines Wilhems - Lot 2 (Quatre Bornes Centre, \nSodnac et Belle Rose), et \n(ii)  Projet d'assainissement de Plaines Wilhems - Lot 1A (West Rose Hill, South West \nQuatre Bornes et Central Quatre Bornes). \nMadame la présidente, la WMA m'informe que le projet d'assainissement de lot 2 de \nPlaines Wilhems a été mené avec la pose de 99,4 km de tuyaux d'égout, le remplacement de \n47,4 km de tuyaux d'eau et le raccordement d'environ 10,000 foyers au réseau d'égouts \npublic. \nLa WMA m'informe également que, dans le cadre du lot 1A, 102 km de tuyaux d'égout \nont été installés et qu'environ 6,800 maisons ont été raccordées au réseau public. De plus, 40 \nkm de canalisations CWA ont été remplacées. \nMadame la présidente, suite à la fermeture de ce contrat des Plaines Wilhems en 2018, \nla WMA a procédé, au cours des dernières années, à la réalisation progressive des travaux \nd'assainissement restants, dans le cadre des contrats distincts. À ce jour, 4,37 km d'égouts ont \nété construits et environ 978 maisons ont été raccordées au réseau public grâce à trois projets \nmenés sur la Route Bassin, La Source et Quatre Bornes. Je peux communiquer bien sûr la \nliste des rues concernées à l’honorable membre si elle le souhaite.  \nLa WMA a annoncé qu'un appel d'offres est en cours auprès du CPB pour un projet \nd'assainissement à Palma et à Quatre Bornes, comprenant la construction de 6 km de tuyaux \net de raccordement de 500 maisons/habitations. La date limite de dépôt des candidatures était \nle 1er avril 2026. \nDe plus, la WMA propose de mettre en place un accord cadre, un scheme, comme on \ndit dans le jargon, pour réaliser les raccordements restant aux égout domestique dans les \ndifférentes régions concernées, sur différentes périodes financières en fonction des fonds \ndisponible. \nMadam Speaker : Good, yes.  \nMs Anquetil : Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. Au nom des habitants de \nPalma, le Dr. Boolell et moi-même, nous remercions le ministre pour sa réponse. L’honorable \nministre peut-il indiquer à la Chambre qui est tenu responsable des retards de la mauvaise \nmise en œuvre des raccordements aux réseaux d’assainissements à Belle-Rose/Quatre \nBornes ? Merci.  \nMr Assirvaden : Je ne sais pas, Madame la présidente, si j’ai ces renseignements mais \nce que je peux communiquer à la Chambre, c’est que les travaux de traitement des eaux usées \nainsi que le remplacement des tuyaux pour la circonscription numéro 18 étaient initialement \nprévus dans le cadre d’un projet de tout-à-l'égout financé par la banque Européenne \nd’investissement et le Exim Bank de China. \nLes travaux de lot 2 ont été achevés en 2014. Toutefois, il faut bien le dire, j’espère que \nje répondrai à cette question-là, toutefois suite à une décision gouvernementale en avril 2015, \nles travaux ont été interrompus dans le cadre du contrat de lot 1A financé par BEI, qui \nn’aboutit qu’a un achèvement partiel des ondes concernés. Il a donc été décidé de terminer les \ntravaux restants par étape, donc cela a été arrêté en 2015 par l’ancien gouvernement.  \nA ce jour, la première phase des travaux d’assainissement de route Bassin a été achevé \net avec 225 maisons raccordées. Qui est responsable ? Bien, c’est l’ancien qui m’a précédé.  \nJe peux aussi dire que le contrat le plus récent attribué à Sotravic dans ce cas de ce \nprojet et les eaux usées à la Source Quatre-Bornes et ces environs relevant de la \ncirconscription numéro 13, a pris du retard. Initialement prévu pour le 10 février 2025, \nl’année dernière, ce contrat a été retardé principalement en raison de l’incapacité de \nl’entrepreneur à mobiliser les ressources nécessaires.  \nDonc, voilà ce que je peux dire à la Chambre.  \nMs Anquetil : Une dernière, Madame la présidente.  \nMadam Speaker : Yes.  \nMs Anquetil : Le ministre peut-il indiquer à la Chambre si les installations de \ntraitement des eaux usées sont soumises à des normes nationales et internationales strictes en \nmatière de protection de l’environnement assorti d’obligation précise quant à la qualité de \nrejets ? Je vous remercie.  \nMr Assirvaden : Encore une fois car même, ces sont des questions assez techniques, \nMadame la présidente. Mais je peux dire que les tout-à-l’égout de Belle-Rose/ Quatre Bornes \nsont acheminés vers la station de St-Martin. Donc, nous avons quatre grosses stations de \ntraitement ; St-Martin, Montagne Jacquot, Grand Baie et Baie du Tombeau. Donc, les \neffluents traités sont rejetés en mer à Pointe Moyenne. Ils sont traités de façon tertiaire. La \nqualité est conforme à la recommandation 2003 relative aux normes des rejets effluents en \nmer en vertu de la loi de 2024 sur la protection de l’environnement.  \nLa WMA est responsable de l’exploitation et l’entretien de quatre grandes stations \nd’épuration dont l’exploitation et l’entretien de la station de St-Martin qui est sous-traité à un \nopérateur privé, Sotravic.   \nMadam Speaker: Ms Collet. \nFREE INTERNET SCHEME – SRM BENEFICIARIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/265",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 265,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/265) Ms R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of Social \nIntegration, Social Security and National Solidarity whether, in regard to the Free Internet \nScheme, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number of \nbeneficiaries on the Social Register having benefitted from the provision of free installation \nand monthly fibre internet service thereunder, indicating the measures being taken, in \ncollaboration with the Rodrigues Regional Assembly and other relevant institutions, to bridge \nthe digital divide among vulnerable households.",
      "answer": "Mr Subron: Madam Speaker, this government is committed to the implementation of \nmeasures for the modernisation and digital transformation of the nation. To this end, Rs85 \nmillion has been earmarked for the next 3 years for the provision of free internet connection \nto around 7000 households, that is, around 27,000 persons on the Social Register of Mauritius \n(SRM) of the Republic Mauritius.  \nThe primary objective behind this most important budgetary measure of 2025-2026 is \nto bridge the digital divide and ensure that these vulnerable households are digitally \nconnected. \nMadam Speaker, in my reply to a PQ on the subject, on 02 December 2025, I informed \nthe House that an online platform was being developed to facilitate the implementation of this \nmeasure. I am pleased to inform that the National Empowerment Foundation (NEF) has, as \nfrom 04 February 2026, issued 6,140 Notices to its beneficiaries – 3,530 in Mauritius and \n2,610 in Rodrigues, to invite them to avail of Internet Gratis from anyone of the three \nInternet Service Providers (ISPs) of their choice. My Ministry has similarly issued 471 \nnotices to those households eligible under the SRM who have opted not to sign the social \ncontract with NEF. Needful is being done to issue notices to around 500 newly eligible \nhouseholds. \nMadame Speaker, I am pleased to inform that, in two months, as at 06 April 2026, \nInternet Gratis connection has successfully been provided to around 5,191 households, \nrepresenting 70% of the households under the SRM. As per reports, 2,415 households (90%) \nof households in Rodrigues under SRM have been connected as at 06 April 2026. In regards \nto Rodrigues, the Internet Gratis project was implemented by the NEF, National \nEmpowerment Foundation Division of Rodrigues, falling under my Ministry.   \nMadam Speaker, reference has been made in the media to a past Scheme known as \n“Free Broadband Internet”. I would like to remind Members that this Scheme was introduced \nin Financial Year 2019-2020 and abruptly put to an end in June 2022 by the previous \ngovernment. An 2022, li paret ki laptop ti eklate, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker, the implementation of this budget measure is successfully enabling \nvulnerable families in the Republic of Mauritius, including our citizens in Rodrigues, to be \ndigitally connected and avail of internet facilities. These households are henceforth benefiting \nfrom free internet connection for their self-development and empowerment while adopting a \nconstructive approach towards learning and developing skills for employability in the digital \neconomy.   \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes.  \nMr François: On a technical point of view, may I know from the hon. Minister whether, \nthe free internet is a one-point connection per house or is it per family registered under the \nSRM? Probably there are two or three families in one household or …. \nMr Subron: The project is providing homebased internet connection to the household.  \nMr François: To the household.  \nMadam Speaker: Ms Collet, you are okay.  \nMs Collet: I am okay. Thank you, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker: Alright, Mr Caserne.  \nELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION REDUCTION – PUBLIC OFFICES/SPACES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/266",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 266,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/266) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to electricity, \nhe will state whether consideration is being given for measures to be taken to encourage the \nreduction in the consumption thereof in public offices and spaces, wherever possible, in the \nlight of the challenges currently being faced by the Central Electricity Board for the \nproduction thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden : Madame la présidente, comme la Chambre le sait, le conflit au Moyen-\nOrient a gravement perturbé la chaîne d'approvisionnement en pétrole et en gaz. La State \nTrading Corporation, s'approvisionnant en fioul lourd (Heavy Fuel Oil) pour CEB pour la \nproduction d'électricité, cette dernière doit faire face à la hausse des primes liées au récent \nchangement d'itinéraire des navires transportant du carburant, comme l’a expliqué ce matin le \nPremier ministre lors de la PNQ. \nAinsi, la valeur d'une cargaison d'environ 33,500 tonnes de fioul lourd, livrée à Port-\nLouis la semaine dernière, a coûté R 489 millions en plus que dans des circonstances \nnormales, soit une augmentation de 68 % sur la facture de la CEB. À ce rythme et avec une \nfréquence moyenne d'une telle cargaison par mois, le coût pour la CEB devient extrêmement \nimportant, sinon intenable. \nDepuis le début de la guerre, la Central Electricity Board a pris un certain nombre de \nmesures pour gérer ses niveaux de stocks de fioul lourd, le heavy fuel oil, telles que – \n(a) \nL’optimisation de l’utilisation du charbon. Donc, on brûle plus de charbons pour \néconomiser l’huile lourde. Donc, sur 20 jours, nous avons pu avoir huit jours \nsupplémentaires de heavy fuel oil ; \n(b) \nNous avons eu le report de la maintenance des centrales à charbon. Les \ncentrales à charbon, des IPPs, ont des périodes de maintenance que nous avons \nrepoussées pour que nous puissions utiliser le maximum de charbons et moins \nd’huile lourde parce qu’à l’heure actuelle, ça coûte plus cher que le charbon ; \n(c) \nNous avons aussi eu une réduction de notre réserve tournante, c’est-à-dire le \nspinning reserve de ce que nous avons. Vous savez, la CEB, en temps normal, a \nun spinning reserve, c’est comme on dit dans une voiture, une veilleuse. En \nprincipe, nous gardons 35 mégawatts de spinning reserve. Donc, la machine \npeut augmenter sa capacité de 35 mégawatts en quelques secondes.  \nDonc, nous gardons cette réserve de 35 mégawatts qui coûte, bien sûr. On brûle \nà ce moment-là de l’huile lourde pour pouvoir garder la réserve.  \nCe que nous avons fait, c’est que nous avons réduit la réserve de 35 mégawatts \nà 20-25 mégawatts pour brûler moins d’huile lourde. Mais le risque est là. Si \nune machine de plus de 30 mégawatts tombe en panne à tout moment, on se \nretrouve à ce moment-là dans un partial délestage. Donc, c’est un risque que \nnous prenons actuellement. Mais c’est un risque calculé. \n Par ailleurs, Madame la présidente, la campagne de sensibilisation à la conservation et \naux économies d'énergie, qui a débuté en octobre de l’année dernière, a été maintenue et est \nen cours de renforcement. J’ai donné des instructions pour qu’on recommence cette \ncampagne de conscientisation, d’efficience énergétique et de sobriété énergétique. \n  Mon ministère, en collaboration avec EEMO, qui est sous mon ministère, et la CEB, a \nmis en place une campagne de sensibilisation à l’économie d'énergie visant à réduire la \nconsommation, notamment aux heures de pointe. Cette campagne est diffusée sur la MBC, à \nla radio, sur les réseaux sociaux, dans le métro et dans les établissements scolaires. Le public \nest invité à adopter des pratiques de consommation d'énergie responsables et à éviter les \ngaspillages.  \nDemain, l’honorable Premier ministre présidera une réunion concernant la crise \nénergétique. Nous allons faire des propositions pour réglementer et appliquer des pénalités si \nnécessaire pour celles et ceux qui gaspillent l’électricité/l’énergie. \nFace aux défis actuels, la campagne de sensibilisation est accélérée et ne se limitera pas à \nla consommation d'électricité aux heures de pointe, mais en général. \n   Madame la présidente, je tiens à préciser que l’EEMO prévoit des interventions ciblées \ndepuis quelque temps à destination de grands consommateurs d’énergie. On a, à Maurice, les \ncompagnies, des sociétés, des activités énergivores qui prennent beaucoup d’électricité. \nDonc, nous allons cibler ces organismes, que ce soit privé ou public. \nAinsi, les grands consommateurs d'énergie et le secteur public et privé seront tenus de \nsoumettre à mon ministère et l'EEMO – donc, demain on va soumettre ce plan-là – un plan \nd’action formel détaillant la mise en œuvre des recommandations issues de leur audit \nénergétique. L’EEMO travaillera en collaboration avec le ministère de l’Environnement afin \nd’orienter les cellules vertes déjà mises en place au sein de l’organisme public. Quant au \nsecteur privé, des lignes directrices détaillées ont été émises. \nMadame la présidente, mon ministère et l'EEMO travaillent à l'élaboration d'un \nrèglement d'application de la loi de 2011 sur l'efficacité énergétique afin de permettre \nl'imposition des restrictions temporaires sur la consommation d'électricité pour les usages non \nessentiels et non liés à la sécurité. Cette mesure de précaution contribuera à gérer \nl'approvisionnement en fioul lourd, heavy fuel oil, et à prolonger la durée de vie des stocks \ndisponibles en limitant la consommation d'électricité. \nCar, vous réalisez, une cargaison nous coûte R 489 millions en plus. Le 16 de ce mois-ci, \nune nouvelle cargaison arrive, ce sera encore une fois, au minimum, R 489 millions \nsupplémentaires. Vous réalisez, en espace de 14 jours, un milliard de roupies \nsupplémentaires ! Donc, une cargaison nous coûte autour de R 1.2 milliards. Deux \ncargaisons, ce sera R 2.4 milliards. C’est intenable ! Pour cette raison, nous allons faire des \npropositions demain au comité. \nOn a aussi huit mesures que nous avons préconisées et que je peux déposer à la \nChambre.  \nMadame la présidente, je saisis cette occasion pour lancer un appel au public, aux \nménages, aux entreprises privées et publiques, aux collectivités locales, aux industries, aux \ncentres commerciaux, aux hôtels et plus généralement à toutes les parties prenantes, afin \nqu’ils utilisent l’électricité efficacement et sans gaspillage pour des activités superflues. \nOn se retrouve, Madame la présidente, dans une situation de crise énergétique. Le prix \ncontinue à augmenter. Avant de venir à l’Assemblée nationale, je regardais un reportage où le \nprésident Trump disait que ce soir, l’Iran ne va plus exister. La carte du monde va changer. \nDonc, vous réalisez, là, où on prenait notre heavy fuel oil à Fujairah, ils n’arrivent plus à \nfournir. On a dû bouger pour aller à Singapore avec les conséquences que nous voyons, R 500 \nmillions par cargaison. \nDonc, cette commodité va devenir de plus en plus rare. C’est pour cette raison qu’hier, \nj’ai annoncé, et le Premier ministre l’a repris aujourd’hui, des propositions concrètes pour \ncombattre, à la longue, dans les trois ans à venir, la dépendance sur les produits pétroliers.  \nCela va prendre le temps qu’il faut, mais nous avons amorcé quelque chose. \nMadam Speaker: Merci. Yes! \nMr Caserne: Je remercie l’honorable ministre pour sa réponse. Puis-je demander à \nl’honorable ministre s’il existe déjà un mécanisme ou si un mécanisme sera mis en place \njustement pour jauger ou pour définir, pour voir l’efficacité des mesures annoncées, que ce \nsoit à travers des campagnes de sensibilisation ou autre, pour assurer l’efficacité des mesures \nqui sont en train d’être prises au niveau du ministère ? Merci. \nMr Assirvaden:  C’est sûr. La question est pertinente et c’est une très bonne question. \nOui, c’est vrai, l’EEMO et MARENA, deux institutions qui tombent directement sous mon \nministère, travaillent à ce que nous ayons en temps réel l’efficacité des mesures de la \ncampagne d’efficience énergétique que nous menons depuis quelque temps. Donc, à travers \nla radio, les explications, les émissions de radio. Depuis la dernière campagne, nous avons pu \néconomiser entre 3 et 6 mégawatts. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Ms Collet! \nMr Assirvaden: Donc, entre 3 et 6 mégawatts. Pardon ? \nMadam Speaker: Je croyais que vous aviez fini. Non, allez-y ! \nMr Assirvaden: Vous êtes sûre ? Je peux, oui. Alors, entre 3 et 6 mégawatts d’économie. \nUn soir, on était dans le rouge. L’année dernière, on était dans le rouge et avec la petite \ncampagne d’information et de conscientisation, ça a descendu à 8 à 9 mégawatts.  \nPour l’instant, on ne peut pas dire combien de millions de roupies nous allons \néconomiser parce qu’on n’économise pas, malheureusement, avec le prix qu’il y a \nactuellement. Mais il y a un mécanisme de suivi. \nMadam Speaker: Maintenant, Ms Collet ! \nMs Collet: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Minister confirm to the House \nwhether the measures his Ministry has envisaged will be applicable to Rodrigues island, \nincluding the set of regulations? \nMr Assirvaden: Oui. \nMs Collet: In toto? \nMr Assirvaden: In toto.  \nMs Collet: In collaboration with the RRA? \nMr Assirvaden: In collaboration with the RRA.  \nMs Collet: Thank you, Sir. \nMadam Speaker: It is like a song.  \nNow, the next question is for hon. Jugurnauth.  \nI am sorry. I am sorry, I think we will remain in Rodrigues. Yes, hon. François!  \nPUBLIC OFFICERS – ALLOWANCES & OVERTIME PAYMENT – DELAYS & \nREMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/267",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 267,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms",
      "question": "(No. B/267) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nPublic Service and Administrative Reforms whether, in regard to the recurrent delays in the \npayment of allowances, including night shift allowance, overtime and extra duty allowances \npayable to public officers in accordance with the recommendations of the Pay Research \nBureau Report and the provisions of the Human Resource Manual, he will state whether \nconsideration is being given for appropriate measures to be introduced to ensure the timely \nsettlement of all overdue and accrued amounts payable.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Local Government (Mr R. Woochit): Madam Speaker, with your \npermission, I will reply to PQ B/267 since I am replacing the substantive Minister. \nI wish to inform the House that in accordance with existing procedures, officers who \nare qualified for payment of the nightshift, extra duty or overtime allowances, have to submit \ntheir claims duly certified by their head of sections at the beginning of every month with \nrespect to claims for the preceding months before payment may be effected. \nAs at date, there are no delays in the payment of nightshift or extra duty allowances in \nrespect of which claims have already been submitted. However, I am informed that there has \nbeen delays in the payment of overtime allowances in some Ministries, Department such as \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness and the Mauritius Fire and Rescue Service in view of \nlate submissions of claims by eligible officers as well as budgetary provisions for overtime \nfor the Financial Year 2025/2026 having been exhausted. I am informed that additional \nfundings have been requested from the Minister of Finance. \nMadam Speaker, it has been observed that over the years, overtime costs have been \nincreasing drastically despite the provision of additional human resources. In this context, the \nMinistry is presently working on new measures in consultation with the Ministries and \nDepartments concerned in the issue of excessive overtime and allowances for control \npurposes. These new measures aim to bringing efficiency gains from diligent use of human \nand financial resources. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMr François: Madam Speaker, may I put just one supplementary? I know the hon. \nMinister is not the substantive Minister. Is the hon. Minister aware of the grievance of some \npublic officers in Rodrigues since their last payment of allowances/overtime were effected \nsince October last year and today, 5 months after, there is a lot of colère parmi les \nfonctionnaires? \nHow can these grievances be remedied? \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker! \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I can only take the request. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. I am all ears. \nMr Woochit: I can only take the request and send it to the substantive Minister. \nMr François: Pou apez koler ban fonksioner ! \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Okay. Now, is that okay? No more questions? \nNow, hon. Jugurnauth! \nBEL OMBRE, ST MARTIN, AVENUE PELICANS – STATE LAND RESIDENTS – \nREGULARISATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/268",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 268,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/268) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) \nasked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to Avenue Pelicans, in St \nMartin, Bel Ombre, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether – \n(a) \nsame is State Land;  \n(b) \nnew constructions are being allowed thereat and, if not, why not, and \n(c) \nconsideration will be given for the regularisation of the situation of residents \nwhose houses stand thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Madam Speaker, I understand that the hon. Member is referring to the \nland in the vicinity of Avenue Pelicans at St Martin in Bel Ombre. With regard to part (a) of \nthe question, I am informed of these lands are not state land. \nWith regard to parts (b) and (c), the issues raised namely, the construction of new \nbuildings and the regularisation of the situation of residents whose houses stand thereat, relate \nto the granting of Building and Land Use permits which falls within the purview of the \nDistrict Council of Savanne. \nI am accordingly informed by the District Council of Savanne that there are long \nstanding structures on site that have existed for over 20 years in addition to some 10 \ndwellings. \nThe issue is that none of those occupiers possess the necessary title deeds and, \nconsequently, no new development has been permitted thereat. Development in this area \ncould potentially be regularised, provided that a legal title is held in the first instance, and that \nall development activities comply with planning norms and existing legislations. But as the \nhon. Member would agree, that is not for me to decide, but for the relevant authorities to \npronounce in these decisions. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, are you alright hon. Jugurnauth? \nAre you happy? Okay! \nHon. First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart, Dr. Prayag! \nPUBLIC HEALTH SECTOR – OUTSTANDING OVERTIME ALLOWANCES – \nSETTLEMENT TIMELINE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/269",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 269,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/269) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the public health sector, he will \nstate the quantum of outstanding overtime allowances as at to date, indicating the – \n(a) \ncategories of officers concerned therewith, and \n(b) \ntimeline for the full settlement thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, according to International Labour Organisation, \novertime is generally defined as working time performed in excess of the normal statutory \nworking hours during a day or a week. \nMadam Speaker, insofar as my Ministry is concerned, the question of overtime is \ndirectly associated to the fact that there is an obligation to ensure continuity of Health \nServices for the population on a 24-hour basis. \nThis includes round-the-clock hospital care services, extended service hours that \nCommunity Health Centres and Area Health Centres and the delivery of new and specialised \nservices such as diabetic foot care, renal transplant follow-up including dialysis, cardiac care \nand geriatric services. \nIn addition, there is a chronic shortage of staff at the level for the various reasons such \nas attrition, retirement, migration of skilled personnel and the dearth of qualified \nprofessionals in several specialised fields. \nTo ensure continuity of services with the population, my Ministry often has no other \nalternative than to have recourse to overtime work. \nMoreover, in view of its mandate, my Ministry is required to carry out urgent and \nsustained field interventions, often, beyond normal working hours in order to ensure timely \nand effective response to public health emergencies which inevitably results in overtime \ncosts. \nMadam Speaker, following my assumption of office, I took note that there were several \noutstanding bills amounting to more than Rs2.2 billion including – \n1. \nCOVID-19 vaccines: Rs575 million; \n2. \nMedical disposables: Rs440 million; \n3. \nOverseas treatment: Rs500 million; \n4. \nProvision and Stores: Rs148 million; \n5. \nCleaning services of premises, Rs95 million; \n6. \nMaintenance of plant and equipment, Rs70 million; \n7. \nFuel and oil, Rs47 million, and \n8. \nOvertime allowances which were about Rs688 million. \nHowever, further investigations carried out at the level of my Ministry and have \ninstitutions have revealed that the figures can be far higher. In fact, in many cases, claims \nhave not been settled since as far back as 2015. \nIn some cases, for example, for claims from overseas hospitals, appropriate records are \nalso not available making settlement of claims extremely difficult. I am also informed that \nmany officers who had worked overtime did not submit claims as payment were not being \nmade. \nHence, the exact amount outstanding is still unknown. The House may wish to recall \nbut an amount of Rs500 million was voted through Estimates of Supplementary Expenditure \nin April 2025 to cater for additional expenses relating to overtime. \nHowever, these funds were not sufficient to cover all the outstanding claims. Madam \nSpeaker, in my reply to Private Notice Question on New Cancer Hospital, on 08 April 2025, I \nhad informed the House that my Ministry has inherited a debt burden of Rs2.2 billion from \nthe previous government. \nAgain, in my intervention on Budget Speech 25 June 2025, I had emphasised that \nhealthcare workers of various grades had not been paid duly earned overtime for several \nmonths or even years. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that presently, there is an outstanding amount of some \nRs532 million in respect of overtime allowances relating mainly to hospitals services, clinical \ncare, field public health operations, ambulance and transport services, laboratory and imaging \nservices, health surveillance activities, maintenance and general services as well \nadministrative and support services across regional health institutions and specialised units of \nthe Ministry. \nFor instance, outstanding overtime payable to the staff of my Ministry – \n(i) \nmedical staff – Rs80.6 million; \n(ii) \nattendant hospital services – Rs24.5 million; \n(iii) nurses – Rs5.5 million. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, the grades concerned cover the \nfollowing categories – \n(a) \nAmbulance staff including ambulance attendants and ambulance drivers; \n(b) \nHospital services staff including attendant/senior attendant, ward assistant, \nlaundry, linen room and mortuary staff; \n(c) \nNursing staff and healthcare assistants; \n(d) \nMedical staff, including Medical and Senior Medical Health Officers, and \nCommunity Physicians; \n(e) \nHealth Surveillance and field public health staff including Insecticide Sprayers, \nRodents Control Attendant, Field Supervisors, and Health Surveillance Officers; \n(f) \nDrivers, Lorry Loaders and transport facilitation staff; \n(g) \nHealth Records, Laboratory, Imaging and technical support staff; \n(h) \nCatering, Maintenance, Trades and General Service staff, and \n(i) \nSupport and administrative staff, General Services, Finance, Procurement and \nHuman Resources Section. \nI also wish to point out that my Ministry continue to receive additional claims for \novertime performed during previous years which have not yet been submitted nor \nconsolidated. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that over the past 3 years, overtime expenditure \nhas remained consistently high due to the operational demands placed on the health sector. \nMadam Speaker as regard part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that the \nclaims for overtime are being paid and will continue to be paid as and when savings can be \nidentified within the current financial year. \nIn addition, my Ministry is working closely with the Ministry of Finance for \nreallocation of funds from savings under other estimates. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Dr. Prayag? Are you happy? \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, Madam Speaker. It is difficult to be happy. I wish to thank the \nhon. Minister for this explicit answer which also replies to the… \nMadam Speaker: Come with your question. \nDr. Prayag: No, it is the same question of the hon. Member from Rodrigues also. In \nview of the growing financial strain being experienced by healthcare workers, their families, \ndifficulties in meeting their educational needs, their household needs, their health needs, I \nfeel that healthcare workers are being penalised in this situation and we agree that it is \nbecause of the previous regime… \nMadam Speaker: Please! Hon. Dr., please come with a question. \nDr. Prayag: Is the hon. Minister envisaging any expedited or special mechanism \nthrough the Ministry of Finance to ensure prompt settlement of these outstanding overtime \nallowances? \nMr Bachoo: I have made it very clear in one sentence. He has never been a Minister, if \nhe had been so, he would have known. A Minister has got only one power, that we make a \nrequest to the Ministry of Finance for the reallocation of funds. It means if funds which are \navailable in other departments have not been utilised, I make a request to the Ministry of \nFinance to allow us to use that money in order to pay whatever we owe to those people. \nMadam Speaker: But his role is to keep you all on your toes!  \nMs Savabaddy: Right, Madam Speaker! \nMadam Speaker: Right! \nMr Bachoo: I thank him for that. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. François? \nMr François: Hon. Minister, does the quantum you just mentioned include the Rs25 \nmillion backlog of payment at the Commission for Health in Rodrigues with an accumulation \nof around Rs20 million monthly? Or, it is just separate; it is not included? \nMr Bachoo: No, no. You see, I have given a global picture. At the same time, I have3 \ncategorised all the different groups where we are owing. That is all. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, alright. \nMr François: Including Rodrigues? \nMr Bachoo: Rodrigues as well. \nMadam Speaker: Another question! Another question! \nDr. Prayag: Is the hon. Minister aware that there are staff who have passed away while \nwaiting for their overtime and now their relatives are looking for these salaries? \nMr Bachoo: I hope this burden will not be put upon us. We are doing our duty without \nfear or favour and we are doing it for the welfare of each and everybody. So, this must be \nvery much clear and those who have looted the country, those who have bled the country \nwhite must be held responsible for that. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, I think we have gone through this question. Now, let us ask \nhon. Ms Henriette-Manan! \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Ms Henriette-Manan is going to speak, please! \nRODRIGUES – LABOUR DISPUTES – EMPLOYERS DOMICILED IN MAURITIUS \n– LEGISLATIVE AMENDMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/270",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 270,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/270) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the \nMinister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to labour disputes, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the Rodrigues Labour Office, information as to the \nnumber thereof registered since 2023 to date in respect of which employers involved therein \nbut domiciled in Mauritius could not be sued before the Industrial Court in Rodrigues, \nindicating the measures taken by his Ministry regarding same, including whether \nconsideration is being given for proposed amendments to be brought to the relevant \nlegislation to ensure that the place of performance of work remains the primary criterion for \nterritorial jurisdiction.",
      "answer": "Mr Uteem: Madam Speaker, allow me to thank the hon. Third Member from Rodrigues \nfor raising this issue which is causing a considerable inconvenience to workers in Rodrigues \nwho have to sue their employers who are domiciled in Mauritius. \nThe Rodrigues Labour Office is under the purview of the Commission for Tourism, \nEmployment, \nLabour \nand \nIndustrial \nRelations, \nInformation \nTechnology \nand \nTelecommunication of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly. However, I am informed that since \n2023, 66 cases have been registered at my Ministry for employers domiciled in the island of \nMauritius for enquiry and possible Court action which involves employees from Rodrigues. \nOut of those 66 cases, 48 cases in respect of which inquiry has been completed have been \nreferred back to Rodrigues Labour Office for necessary action. 10 cases are still under inquiry \nat the level of my Ministry. Three cases concern reinstatement, of which, two were referred to \nthe Employment Relations Tribunal where an agreement was reached between the parties and \nboth workers were reinstated. As far as the third case for reinstatement is concerned, although \nthe termination of work was justified, the parties agreed to reach an out-of-court settlement \nthrough an Ex-Gratia payment. \nIn regard to the five remaining cases, four workers have withdrawn their complaints \namong others due to cost implication relating to attendance at the Industrial Court in \nMauritius while the last remaining case has been referred back to Rodrigues Labour Office \nfor further inquiry prior to lodging a case before the Industrial Court of Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker, as regards the issue of territorial jurisdiction to lodge a case, I am \ninformed that prior to October 2020, it had been the practice for officers of the Rodrigues \nLabour Office to lodge cases against defaulting employers, including those domiciled in \nMauritius before the Industrial Court (Rodrigues Division), so before the Industrial Court in \nRodrigues.  \nHowever, following a ruling delivered on 26 October 2020 in the matter of Jean \nJohnson Begue and Miss Arielle Dulcy Andre against Mauritours Ltd by the Industrial Court \n(Rodrigues Division), the Court held that the Court of Rodrigues is not competent to hear \ncases where a defendant employer is domiciled in Mauritius. Mr Begue had on 10 November \n2020 written to the Chief Justice of Mauritius, requesting a review of the said ruling. \nHowever, on 24 November 2020, Mr Begue was informed that the Reviewing Authority had \nfound no valid reason to review the decision and his application was set aside. Since then, all \ncases where employers are domiciled in the island of Mauritius have to be lodged before the \nIndustrial Court in Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker, as there is considerable inconvenience for a labour dispute involving a \nworker residing in Rodrigues Island and his employer domiciled in Mauritius to be resolved \nbefore the Industrial Court in Mauritius, my Ministry is taking up the matter with the \nAttorney General’s Office with a view to finding an appropriate solution. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes? \nMs Henriette-Manan: Merci beaucoup pour la réponse, honorable ministre. Je \nvoudrais quand même vous demander, dans les cas où le tribunal industriel de Rodrigues n’a \npas juridiction et où le travailleur est contraint d’intenter une action à Maurice, l’honorable \nministre peut-il indiquer si une aide financière ou une assistance juridique sera fournie à ces \ntravailleurs, afin de couvrir les frais de déplacement et d’hébergement ou s’il se voit \neffectivement refuser l’accès à la justice en raison des contraintes géographiques et \nfinancières ? Merci. \nMr Uteem: Madame la présidente, pour l’instant il n’y pas d’assistance financière \nqu’est offerte aux travailleurs rodriguais qui doivent à Maurice, faire le déplacement pour \nloger leur affaire en cour. Comme je vous dis, on est en train d’étudier avec le bureau de \nl’Attorney General, avec bien sûr le concours du Chief Justice, si on ne pourrait pas faire \nentendre les cas par la cour industrielle à Rodrigues elle-même. On pourrait aussi \néventuellement envisager une situation où la cour puisse ordonner à l’employeur – s’il est \ntrouvé coupable – d’indemniser les frais de déplacement du travailleur rodriguais. Mais, tout \ncela est à l’étude entre mon ministère et le bureau de l’Attorney General. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, okay. Il y a d’autres solutions. \nMr François: Well replied.  \nMadam Speaker: Il y a d’autres solutions. Hon. Seeburn! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 11 – ROAD SAFETY – IMPROVEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/271",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 271,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/271) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to road safety, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit, information as to \nthe actions taken, if any, in response to requests from residents of Constituency No. 11 for the \nenhancement thereof in the highly residential areas thereof, including the installation of speed \ntables or other traffic calming measures, indicating whether site surveys, feasibility studies or \ntraffic assessments have been carried out and, if so, give details thereof, including \nimplementation timelines and interim measures being envisaged, if any.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Traffic Management \nand Road Safety Unit that several requests have been received from residents of Constituency \nNo. 11 regarding improvement of road safety, especially in the highly inhabited areas. The \nrequests pertain mainly to the following – \n• \npainting of yellow lines for parking prohibitions; \n• \npainting of yellow boxes; \n• \nsetting of pedestrian crossings; \n• \nimplementation of traffic calming measures such as road humps; \n• \nlimitation of speed by placing traffic signs, and  \n• \nprovision of handrails and footpaths among others. \nThese projects do not warrant feasibility studies as such as they are fundamentally of \nsmall scale. As per normal practice, surveys are conducted and consultative meetings are held \nwith key stakeholders to assess the need for specific projects and determine the most \nappropriate sites where the improvement works have to be undertaken.  \nAccordingly, upon receipt of the request, the TMRSU coordinates with key \nstakeholders, and the feasibility of the proposed measures or projects are jointly agreed upon. \nWhere warranted, recommendations are made and approved, and projects are implemented \nwithin a reasonable timeframe, subject to the availability of funds. In cases where the \nrequested measures cannot be implemented due to traffic constraints and other technical \nreasons, the TMRSU explores alternative solutions to enhance road safety. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed by the TMRSU that since 2025, the following \nmeasures have been recommended and are currently being implemented in Constituency No. \n11 – \n(i) \npainting of single and double yellow lines at 10 locations; \n(ii) \nimplementation of pedestrian crossings at two locations; \n(iii) \nimplementation of raised tables at three locations; \n(iv) \nimplementation of traffic signs and road markings at five locations, and \n(v) \npainting of yellow boxes at two locations. \nFor the information of the hon. Member, I am tabling details of the works and locations \nconcerned. \nMadam Speaker, works involving the painting of yellow lines, traffic signs, road \nmarkings and pedestrian crossings are ongoing and are being implemented by the in-house \nteam of the TMRSU.  \nAs regards the supply of traffic signs, including the replenishment of stock, I am given \nto understand that the contract has recently been awarded. Works for the construction of \nraised tables will be implemented through the framework agreement contracts, which have \nbeen recently awarded as well.  \nI would like to underline that this framework agreement was being considered at the \nlevel of the CPB, where it sustained an inordinate delay in its finalisation. This is the main \nreason why the implementation of traffic calming measures could not be carried out earlier. I \nexplained, last week, the issues we faced for the finalisation of that framework agreement. \nI wish to assure that the traffic calming measures which have remained pending, \nincluding the installation of speed tables will, henceforth, be implemented across the island, \nincluding Constituency No. 11, within the least possible delay. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Is there a supplementary? Yes! \nMr Seeburn: Can I ask the hon. Minister whether he is in a position to request for \nfinancial assistance in the forthcoming budget so that the projects that have been identified by \nthe Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit are implemented, as they are measures of \nsafety concerns for the inhabitants? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes, of course, this is being done, not only for Constituency \nNo. 11, but across the island. It is an ongoing exercise, now that we are two months away \nfrom the budget presentation. \nAn hon. Member: Next question! \nMadam Speaker: Yes! Merci. C’est bien quand tout le monde est réveillé ! C’est bien ! \nINFLATIONARY PRESSURES – ASSISTANCE SCHEMES/SUBSIDIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/272",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 272,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/272) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the \nprevailing inflationary pressures, he will state whether consideration will be given for the \nintroduction of an assistance scheme through the Stabilisation Fund targeted at supporting the \nmost vulnerable segments of the population and, if so, give details thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Yeung Sik Yuen: Madam Speaker, Government is fully cognisant of the impact of \nprevailing inflationary pressures on households, particularly on the most vulnerable segments \nof the population.  \nSince March 2025, the retail prices of additional commodities were put under price \ncontrol, maximum mark-up regime. These include 25% of mark-up which was introduced on \ncanned vegetables and 34% on frozen packed vegetables to increase the purchasing power of \nconsumers, especially for low to middle income families. A price control list was extended \nfor new products such as canned sausages, canned poultry, like Luncheon Meat, canned tuna, \ncanned prawns, shrimps, butter and margarine. \nDuring the Budget 2025-2026, the Government has removed VAT on essential \ncommodities such as infant foods, canned vegetables and frozen packed vegetables. \nFurthermore, Government has put in place a Price Stabilisation Fund of Rs10 billion over a \nperiod of 5 years, representing an annual amount of Rs2 billion. This fund is specially \ndesigned to cushion customers against increases in the prices of essential goods.  \nOn 26 August 2025, Government introduced a fixed quantum subsidy mechanism \nunder the Price Stabilisation Fund on key essential commodities, namely – \n(i) \nRs50 per kg on milk powder; \n(ii) \nRs15 per litre on edible oil; \n(iii) Rs55 per 900g on infant milk powder; \n(iv) Rs25 per pack of 50 baby diapers, and \n(v) \nRs10 per 250g on processed cheese. \nThis programme has subsequently been expanded as follows – \n(i) \non 15 January 2026, to include a subsidy of 50 cents per unit on adult diapers, and \n(ii) \non 01 February 2026, to include a subsidy of Rs10 per can on canned mackerel \nand pilchards as well as Rs50 per box on essential medicines, namely \nantihypertensive, cardiovascular and anti-diabetic products, covering some 829 \nmedicines available on the market. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to underline that this measure is not merely a policy \nannouncement, but it is fully operational. At the end of February 2026, an amount of \napproximately Rs641 million for the essential commodities mentioned has already been \ndisbursed under the Price Stabilisation Fund. This figure is expected to reach around Rs900 \nmillion by June 2026. The total projected disbursement is around Rs1.6 billion for the \nFINANCIAL YEAR 2025-2026. In addition, an amount of Rs331 million is being provided \nto support bakeries for the latter to maintain the price of scheduled bread at Rs2.60.  \nThese measures are yielding measurable and tangible results. For instance, the subsidy \nmechanism has contributed to the following – \n(a) \na reduction of approximately 24.2% in the retail price of milk powder; \n(b) \na decrease of around 5.8% in the price of edible oil; \n(c) \nreductions ranging between 5-6% for other essential commodities, and \n(d) \nprice decreases of up to 42% for certain essential medicines. \nIn fact, it has been found that the prices of some subsidised commodities are even now \nlower than those prevailing prior to November 2024. This clearly demonstrates the \neffectiveness of assistance provided by the Government. \nGovernment is also providing direct financial assistance to vulnerable groups through \nsocial aid schemes, including monthly income support, food assistance and targeted \nallowances for single mothers, children and persons with disabilities. \nMadam Speaker, as demonstrated, Government has already implemented a \ncomprehensive assistance framework through the Price Stabilisation Fund which directly \naddresses the impact of inflation on the most vulnerable segments of the population. \nNevertheless, Government continues to closely monitor developments and remains prepared \nto further calibrate and expand targeted support measures where necessary, in a manner that \nis both effective and fiscally sustainable. It is to be noted that this is a main item which is \nbeing looked into by the crisis committee. \nMadam Speaker: Alright. Hon. Ramkalawon asked first. Then, you. \nMr Ramkalawon: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the Minister organise, through his \nMinistry, strict control on edible oil, especially because of the low supply? Some suppliers \nare actually hiding some stocks. \nMadam Speaker: Hoarding! \nMr Ramkalawon: Yes, exactly! Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: That’s the term. \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Madam Speaker, I believe that there is full stock of edible oil. \nBut if there is any issue, please, contact us on the Hotline 185. \nMr Juman: Merci, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Plus fort! \nMr Juman: Puis-je savoir de l’honorable ministre, depuis la mise en pratique du \nmaximum mark-up en novembre 2024, on est en train de parler de 700 millions de roupies, – \nje vous explique, donnez-moi le temps – pourcentage concrètement aujourd’hui, est-ce qu’on \npeut avoir une liste comparative entre novembre 2024 et aujourd’hui, de certains produits, \nproduits de base ? Si vous n’avez pas, vous pouvez déposer à la table de l’Assemblée ? \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: En fait, j’ai deux listes avec moi. J’ai une liste des prix avec \nsubsides, donc –  \n(i) \nil y a le lait Farmland, par exemple, aujourd’hui c’est en vente à R 256.62. \nQuand on le compare avec en novembre 2024, c’était à R 274.90. \nMadam Speaker: Ne nous lisez pas tout ! \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Donc, je peux donner quelques exemples. \nMadam Speaker: Allez, trois ! \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Oui, trois exemples, côté subsides. Donc, – \n(ii) \nBega processed cheese, R 82.49 aujourd’hui et en novembre 2024, c’était à R \n95.29.  \n(iii) \nEt puis, de l’huile Moroil R 71.49 aujourd’hui, et c’était en novembre 2024, \nc’était à R 79.70. \nJ’ai aussi quelques items, ici, sur les produits maximum mark-up. Je vais aussi donner \ntrois items. Donc, –  \n(i) \nMcCain Tradition Fries R 134.21 aujourd’hui, le prix maximum, et en \nnovembre 2024, c’était à R 183, soit 36.5 % en moins. \n(ii) \nWatties Garden Peas (900g) R 190.54 aujourd’hui, et c’était, en novembre 2024, \nR 236, soit 38 % aujourd’hui en moins.  \n(iii) \nUn dernier point, Belinda Red Kidney Beans R 29.73 aujourd’hui, et en \nnovembre 2024, c’était à R 46, soit 54 % en moins. \nEt aussi, je vais prendre la peine de déposer à la Chambre. Merci. \nMadam Speaker : Oui, je crois que c’est bien. Merci beaucoup, M. le ministre. \nHeureusement qu’on a bien mangé, ça ne nous donne pas faim. \nOkay, any more? Mr Juman, have you finished? \nOkay, next question, B/273, has been withdrawn. \nSo, now I am asking for B/274, Dr. Aumeer! \nHIGHLANDS – INCINERATOR – FIRE CERTIFICATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/273",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 273,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/273) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the incinerator at Highlands, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether a fire certificate has been issued in \nrespect thereof and, if so, indicate the date of coming into operation thereof and, if not, why \nnot.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \nLEASING COMPANIES (REGISTERED) – INTERNATIONAL & FATF \nSTANDARDS – REPORTED FAILED COMPLIANCE \n\n87",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/274",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 274,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/274) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port-Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard \nto the leasing companies, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Financial \nServices Commission, information as to the current number thereof registered therewith and \noperating in Mauritius, indicating whether any one of these companies has reportedly failed \nto comply with international standards, including the core components of the Financial \nAction Task Force standards.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ms Jeetun: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Financial Services Commission \nthat there are currently 12 leasing companies licensed and operating in Mauritius. 9 of these \nare domestic while 3 are global business licence holders. \nMadam Speaker, the FSC carries out on-site inspections for its licensees, including \nleasing companies using a risk-based approach derived from the National Risk Assessment. \nEntities falling within very high-risk clusters and carrying out very high-risk ratings are \ninspected annually while inspection cycles become longer as the level of risk decreases at \neither the cluster or entity level ranging from every two to seven years. Such entities remain \nsubject to ongoing off-site monitoring and supervisory oversight to ensure continued \ncompliance with AML/CFT requirements.  \nLeasing activities were rated as medium risk based on the 2019 NRA Report. Based on \nthis risk rating, the FSC deployed its risk based on-site inspection plan for the sector. During \nperiod 2020 to 2024, the FSC conducted six on-site inspections. Following the publication of \nthe NRA Report 2025, that is, last year, whereby the leasing sector was rated at medium high \nrisk – so, a more elevated risk – the FSC carried out three inspections of leasing companies in \n2025. Out of the nine leasing companies that have been subject to inspections between 2020 \nand 2025, three companies were identified as having short comings to a varying extent in \ntheir AML/CFT systems and controls. Out of these three companies, one leasing company \nwas identified as having serious deficiencies in its AML/CFT controls and was placed under \nclose monitoring by the FSC. \nAs at August 2025, Madam Speaker, the deficiencies identified were still not \nadequately remedied. Subsequently, that leasing company was placed under investigation \nwhich is still on-going.  \nMadam Speaker, at this stage, I have been informed that information relating to the \ninvestigation is being treated with confidentiality at the level of the Financial Services \nCommission. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Any questions? \nYes, Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, hon. Minister. Madam Speaker, may I ask the hon. Minister \nwhether she has any information in regard to certain leasing companies based in Mauritius \nwho are being used as smoke screen for those who have been recently arrested by the \nFinancial Crimes Commission with regard to money laundering and drug trafficking in the \nacquisition of super luxury cars and pleasure crafts? \nDr. Ms Jeetun: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I am not aware of the details of any \nspecific case because FSC does not give confidential case by case information. However, \nwhat I can say is that there is this one case where the clients of that company are being \ninvestigated and there have been collaborations between FSC and FCC, which is ongoing at \nthe moment. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, hon. Minister. May I, therefore, request the hon. Minister \nwhether her Ministry can conduct an in-depth inquiry, particularly on two leasing companies \nwhich I am going to share the information with you afterwards, which are heavily, at 80%, \ninvolved in the acquisition of these super luxury cars and pleasure crafts by particularly one \nof them whereby no strict KYC has been done in regards to those who were looking for \nleasing facilities? \n Dr. Ms Jeetun: I look forward to receiving that information and I have also \nhighlighted to the FSC, in view of the recent cases since last year, that we have read in the \npress, to increase the on-site inspections of leasing companies which looks like are being \nused as washing machines for, you know, dirty money basically. But I look forward to \nreceiving that which I will then transmit to the FSC. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Is that okay everyone? \nDr. Aumeer: Yes! \nMadam Speaker: Alright. Now, so there are so many questions that have been \nwithdrawn. Maybe I shall do this for the moment and tell you. The Table has been advised \nthat the following PQs have been withdrawn - B/273, B/280, B/287, B/290, B/296, B/300, \nB/301, B/303, B/306, B/307, B/309, and B/315. But we still have a little bit of time to finish. \nNow, hon. Jugurnauth, yes! \nTERRACINE, SOUILLAC – NEW HOUSING ESTATE – DRAIN WORKS – \nCOST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/275",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 275,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/275) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the drain works being effected at \nthe new housing estate at Terracine, Souillac, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to the – \n(a)  scope of works and cost thereof;  \n(b)  name of the contractor, and  \n(c)  expected completion date thereof.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Housing and Lands (Mr S. Mohamed): Madam Speaker, with your \npermission, I shall reply to Parliamentary Question B/275. \nWith regard to part (a), I am informed by the NSLD that the scope of works consists \nmainly of –  \n• upgrading an existing earthen cut-off drain located upstream of the NSLD site \nup to its discharge point in Rivière Savanne;  \n• realigning part of the existing drain;  \n• constructing two new culverts at road crossings along the B9 Road and an \nexisting track road; \n• concrete lining of the existing arch bridge near Domaine Cascade, and  \n• ancillary works, including the relocation of existing services and reinstatement \nof affected areas.  \nThe cost of the project is estimated at Rs128.5 million. \nAs regards part (b), I am further informed by the NSLD that the contract has been \nawarded to Transinvest Construction Ltd. \nWith regard to part (c), the works are expected to be completed by 28 December 2026. \nMadam Speaker: Alright, next question.  \nDr. Ms Daureeawo. \nSMALL & MEDIUM ENTERPRISES – LOAN FACILITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/276",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 276,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives",
      "question": "(No. B/276) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives whether, in regard to the \nsmall and medium enterprises, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from SME \nMauritius Ltd., information as to the number thereof registered therewith as at date, \nindicating – \n (a) the total amount of loans granted thereto over the period 2020 to 2024; \n (b)  whether an assessment has been carried out in respect of the obstacles faced by \nsame, and  \n(c)  the measures being envisaged to support same in overcoming trade barriers and \nexpanding internationally.",
      "answer": "Mr Ameer Meea: Madam Speaker, the registration of small and medium enterprises at \nmy Ministry is governed by the provisions of the SME Act 2017. According to the First \nSchedule of the Act, SMEs are categorised as microenterprise where the annual turnover does \nnot exceed Rs10 million, small enterprises where the annual turnover exceeds Rs10 million \nbut does not exceed Rs30 million, medium enterprise where the annual turnover exceeds \nRs30 million but does not exceed Rs100 million and mid-market enterprise where the \nturnover exceeds Rs100 million but does not exceed Rs250 million.  \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that SMEs are not registered by SME \nMauritius Ltd, which is a government-owned private company falling under the purview of \nmy Ministry but rather by the SME Registration Unit of my Ministry. I am informed that as at \ndate, there are 23,429 SMEs registered with my Ministry.  \nRegarding part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the House that neither SME \nMauritius Ltd nor my Ministry provide any kind of loan to SMEs. In fact, SME can avail loan \nfacilities from the DBM, the MauBank, the Industrial Finance Corporation of Mauritius \n(IFCM) as well as from commercial banks. As regards my Ministry, SME Mauritius provides \ngrants to SMEs under various schemes namely the Business Transformation Scheme, \nTechnology and Innovation Scheme, Market Readiness Scheme, Greening Support Scheme \nand Agri-Business Scheme.  \nMadam Speaker, regarding part (b) of the question, I am informed that assessments of \nobstacles faced by business enterprises have been made by several government institutions as \nfollows – \n• \nThe SME division of my Ministry continuously carries out assessment of the \ndifficulties faced by the SMEs through regular site visits and consultations with \nSME; \n• \nSME Mauritius also carries out consultation with SMEs to identify their \noperational challenges with a view to formulating targeted trainings and schemes \nin order to address these obstacles; \n• \nThe Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade and \nthe Mauritius Chamber of Commerce, jointly manage the Trade Obstacles Alert \nMechanism since 2015. The platform provides a proactive framework to identify \nand address trade obstacles encountered by the business community in course of \nimport and export operations; \n• \nThe Mauritius Chamber of Commerce and Industry also conducts regular \nmeetings under specific commissions and committees, for instance, its commerce \nindustry and services and economic commission take stock of issues and \nobstacles for its members; \nMadam Speaker, regarding part (c) of the question, I am informed that Mauritius has \nsigned a number of trade agreements with friendly countries namely, the European Union, the \nUK, China and India, which provide for duty free and quota free access for our locally \nmanufactured products with a view to overcoming of trade barriers.   \nThe trade agreements are mainly the Eastern and Southern Africa European Union \nEconomic Partnership Agreement, Eastern and Southern Africa United Kingdom Economic \nPartnership Agreement, Mauritius China-Trade Agreement, Mauritius-India Comprehensive \nCorporation and Partnership Agreement which is called CECPA, and Mauritius-United Arab \nEmirates Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement. Mauritius is also member of \nRegional Trade Blocks such as the SADC, the COMESA and African Continental Free Trade \nArea.  \nHowever, I wish to inform the House that FTAs signed with friendly countries not only \nbenefit Mauritian entrepreneurs but, in some cases, they tend to be more advantageous to the \nforeign countries exporting to Mauritius. This has even led to situations like dumping of very \ncheap low-quality goods from overseas markets.  \nMadam Speaker, regarding measures to support our local enterprises to international, I \nam informed that a number of export schemes are available and manged by the EDB to boost \nthe competitiveness of export manufacturing enterprises namely the Trade and Marketing \nScheme, Freight Rebate Scheme, Export Credit Guarantee Insurance Scheme and \nParticipation in International Fairs SME Refund Scheme.  \nFurthermore, my Ministry through SME Mauritius Ltd, provides support to SMEs \nunder various grant schemes aimed at assisting enterprises in product development, \ncertification, export readiness among others.  \nThank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister. Yes, Dr. Ms Daureeawo. \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Could the hon. Minister consider an \nimpact evaluation or assessment to show how public funds have delivered real growth? \nMr Ameer Meea: Yes, of course this can be done.  \nMadam Speaker: Good. Dr. Prayag.  \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 7 – AMITIÉ FOOTBALL GROUND – STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-14-april-2026"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/277",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 277,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/277) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Amitié Football Ground in \nConstituency No. 7, Piton and Rivière du Rempart, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain information as to the current status thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that a plot of land \nmeasuring 8,881 metre square situated at Amitié, has been duly acquired by government and \nvested in the District Council of Rivière du Rempart in October 2025 for the purpose of \nconstructing a football ground together with the necessary amenities.  \nFollowing the vesting, the site has already been cleared in December 2025 and a site \nvisit was carried out in collaboration with the Ministry of Housing and Lands to confirm \nboundary points and facilitate reparatory works. \nMadam Speaker, the estimated cost of the project is approximately Rs40 million. \nHowever, due to budgetary constraints, implementation could not proceed during the current \nfinancial year. The District Council of Rivière du Rempart has included this capital project as \na priority in its proposal for the Financial Year 2026-2027. Implementation will therefore \nproceed once the necessary financial provision is secured subject to prioritisation by the \nMinistry of Finance and the completion of all required administrative and technical \nclearances.  \nIn the meantime, I have requested the District Council to ensure that the site is \nmaintained in a clean condition.  \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. I think we will do a last one with Mr Apollon.  \nThat’s the last question.  \nMAHEBOURG WATERFRONT – STEEL JETTY – PROPOSED \nREPLACEMENT – ESTIMATED COST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/278",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 278,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/278) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg &Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the proposed replacement of \nthe steel jetty situated at the Mahebourg Waterfront, he will state where matters stand, \nindicating the – \n (a) \nestimated cost, and  \n(b)  expected start and completion dates thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that as already raised under \nParliamentary Question B/601, Government is fully apprised of the deteriorated conditions of \nthe steel jetty at the Mahebourg Waterfront, which has been closed for safety reasons and for \nthe urgent needs for its replacement to ensure public safety while supporting tourism and \nlocal economic activities.  \nA document detailing the different structural options, currently under consideration for \nthe replacement of the jetty, is being tabled for the benefit of the House. These include \nvarious design configuration and materials option suitable for the marine environment. \nAmong these, a reinforced concrete structure is one of the leading options under \nconsideration given its durability, reduced maintenance and long-term cost effectiveness.  \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that the estimated cost for the replacement \nproject is approximately Rs25 million based on preliminary technical assessment carried out \nby the District Council of Grand Port. In this regard, provision has been made in the \nforthcoming financial estimate for an interim allocation of Rs25 million to enable the project \nto proceed to its preparatory phase in the next financial year.  \nThis will cover among others, the appointment of consultants for a detailed design, \nstructure and drawings, the carried out of engineering studies and feasibility assessment and \nthe undertaking of the Environment Impact Assessment and other statutory process as maybe \nrequired.  \nThese preparatory works will be subject to the approval of the Ministry of Finance and \nto the necessary clearances from the Ministry of Environment and other authorities. \nAs regards to part (b) of the question, Madam Speaker, the project is presently at its \npreparatory stage. The commencement of physical works will depend on the finalisation of \nthe selected structures option, completion of all the technical studies and the obtaining of the \nrequired statutory approvals. Subject to these approvals and financial clearances, \nimplementation will proceed thereafter in a structured and timely manner. It would be \npremature at this stage to commit a firm start and completion date. \nIn the meantime, Madam Speaker, I wish to reassure the House that appropriate safety \nmeasures remain in place at the Mahebourg Waterfront to ensure public safety pending the \nimplementation of the project. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Apollon! \nMr Apollon: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Thank you, hon. Minister. I thank you for \nyour answer. Can I make a request for a site visit at the Mahebourg Waterfront to see this \neyesore which is being posted every week on social media so that we can give the renovation \na priority for the next budget? \nMr Woochit: Of course, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Of course. \nMr Woochit: We can do a site visit at the convenience of the hon. Member. \nMadam Speaker: The presence of all concerned. \nMr Woochit: No problem. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. So sweetly said.  \nTime is up!  \nThe Table has been advised that the following PQs, over and above those I have already \nmentioned, have been withdrawn: B/251, B/279, B/280, B/282, B/283, B/286, B/288, B/289, \nB/291, B/292, B/294, B/295, B/298, B/299, B/302, B/304, B/305, B/311, B/312, B/314, \nB/313, and B/317 have been withdrawn. \nYes, hon. Prime Minister! \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that all the business on today’s \nOrder Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10.  \nMr Mohamed seconded.  \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister of Education! \nSTATEMENT BY MINISTER \nFORMER DPM STATEMENT – CLARIFICATION REGARDING MR K.C. & \nMINISTRY ENQUIRY \n(4.28 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Education and Human Resource (Dr. M. Gungapersad): Madam \nSpeaker, with your permission, I have to make a statement about a matter raised by the \nformer Deputy Prime Minister (DPM) concerning a conversation that I had with him \nregarding one Mr K.C. \nI wish to dispel all doubts that may, unfortunately, linger after that statement of the \nformer DPM. In fact, it is the former DPM who called me, and, amongst others, he asked me \nquestions relating to an enquiry which had to be initiated at the level of my Ministry \nregarding a particular school, but which had not started for reasons beyond my control. \nI also related an incident when the said Mr K.C. had brought someone to my office, at \nMITD Pheonix, regarding the same and I had asked them to leave as it was inappropriate for \nme to speak to them given that an enquiry had been initiated. The conversation which had \nhardly started was cut short by myself as soon as I realised that the person brought to see me \nwanted to speak about the school which was subject of the enquiry.  \nI thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nHon. Minister! \nPUBLIC BILL \nSecond Reading \nTHE ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING, COMBATTING THE FINANCING OF \nTERRORISM AND COUNTERING PROLIFERATION FINANCING \n(MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) BILL \n(No. III of 2026) \nOrder read for resuming adjourned debate on the Second Reading of the Anti-Money \nLaundering, Combatting the Financing of Terrorism and Countering Proliferation Financing \n(Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill (No. III of 2026). \nQuestion again proposed. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister Assirvaden!  \n(4.29 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities (Mr P. Assirvaden): Merci, Madame la \nprésidente. Je ne serai pas long.  \nMadame la présidente, je suis heureux de commenter ces amendements présentés par \nma collègue sur The Anti-Money Laundering, Combatting the Financing of Terrorism and \nCountering Proliferation Financing Bill. \nMadame la présidente, sûrement, les Mauriciennes et les Mauriciens, qui nous écoutent \nconcernant ces amendements, se posent la question : quelle est l’utilité d’emmener ces \namendements en 2026 ? Est-ce que ces amendements sont des priorités ? C’est la priorité des \npriorités de ce gouvernement dans ce contexte où on est. Moi aussi je me suis posé la \nquestion quand ma collègue a emmené les amendements au cabinet et je me suis fait un \ndevoir d’aller lire.  \nCe n’est pas vraiment dans ma ligne d’action en tant que ministre, mais je me suis fait \nun devoir d’aller lire ce qui a été proposé par ma collègue. La conclusion qui est sortie assez \nrapidement, c’est que ce projet de loi est pertinent à l’heure actuelle. Nécessaire, pertinent, et \nd’une importance capitale. Car cela s’inscrit dans une volonté claire : améliorer de manière \nsubstantielle l’efficacité de notre pays dans la lutte contre la criminalité financière sous toutes \nses formes, qu’il s’agisse de blanchiment d’argent, de financement du terrorisme ou encore \ndes mécanismes de financement liés à la prolifération. \nAussi, en lisant, en essayant de comprendre – quand même, c’est technique. Il y a une \ntechnicité dans ces amendements –, il s’agit également de permettre à nos institutions d’agir \navec davantage de rapidité, de précision, d’efficacité face à des pratiques de plus en plus \nsophistiquées.  \nEn général, pour les Mauriciennes et les Mauriciens qui se posent la question : pourquoi \nces amendements ? Pourquoi en sommes-nous arrivés là en avril 2026 ? La réponse, partielle \ndu moins, est que nous faisons face à l’héritage d’une décennie marquée par un scandale \nfinancier de tout genre sous le régime du MSM !  \nMs Anquetil: Tout à fait ! \nMr Assirvaden: Avec comme Premier ministre Pravind Kumar Jugnauth.  \nMs Anquetil: Madame ! \nMr Assirvaden: Une décennie durant laquelle les dérives se sont accumulées, où les \ngarde-fous institutionnels ont été contournés comme des bouchons de champagne, sautés, où \ndes pratiques inacceptables ont pris racine. \nDr. Boolell: To pe donn li valer, koup ar bouchon champagne! \nMr Assirvaden: Le blanchiment d’argent ne relevait plus de l’exception, il y a 10 ans \nde cette décennie. Il tendait à devenir un véritable pilier du monde opératoire de l’ancien \nrégime. C’est précisément pour rompre avec cette logique que nous devons aujourd’hui agir \navec détermination. \nMadame la présidente, j’ai vu que l’amendement à la Banking Act et au FIU, les \nsections 26, 50, 53A, 69, vont être proposés pour être amendés. Je ne sais pas en ce qui \nconcerne mes collègues, mais il y a quelque temps de cela, depuis notre arrivée au pouvoir, \nj’ai entendu parler du reward money.  \nCe reward money, à mon avis, Madame la présidente, est l’un des dossiers qui a \nprofondément marqué l’opinion des Mauriciennes et Mauriciens, en général. Marqué \nl’opinion publique. Pour beaucoup de Mauriciens qui m’écoutent ce soir, ce dossier est \ndevenu le symbole même de la dilapidation des fonds publics sous le MSM. J’entends \ncertaines personnes dire – enfin – ils ont la nostalgie du temps du MSM ! \nMs Anquetil: Ayo bondie ! \nMr Assirvaden: C’est la dilapidation des fonds ! Mais au même moment, c’est la \nnature même du système qui interpelle, car ceux qui étaient concernés un moment donné, \nMadame la présidente, qui étaient touchés, c’était le cœur même de nos institutions. Quand \ndes unités comme la Special Striking Team, le Special Intelligence Cell, the Counter \nTerrorism Unit, the Force Crime Intelligence Unit étaient touchées, la population était \nchoquée ! Pour ne pas dire scandalisée !  \n Quand nous avons vu des retraits en espèces ; allez à la banque et essayez de faire un \nretrait de R 300 000. Allez à la banque, les Mauriciens qui m’écoutent ce soir, allez à la \nbanque, essayez de mettre R 50 000 que vous avez eus en cadeau de vos enfants de l’étranger, \nla banque vous demande the source of fund. La banque vous demande de remplir une fiche \npour mettre R 200 000 en cash.  \nEt ici, entre le 18 octobre 2024 et le 07 novembre 2024, pas moins de R 14 millions ont \nété retirés du compte d’un ACP de police sous l’ancien régime MSM alors que le Premier \nministre s’asseyait là, ici, à la place de l’honorable Ms Savabaddy. \n(Interruptions) \nCes retraits, Madame la présidente, effectués en raison de R 1 million par jour mais cela \nn’a ring the bell pour personnes ? L’ancien ministre des Finances, Padayachy, l’ancien \nPremier ministre n’ont rien vu – R 14 millions de retraits chaque jour. Oui ! \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member : Ek zot ena toupe al dan… \nMr Gunness: Pou finans kampagn… \nMr Assirvaden : Justement, ces retraits effectués en raison de R1 million par jour \ndépassaient largement les plafonds fixés par la Financial Intelligence Anti-Money Laundering \nAct. \nMr Gunness: Zis avan eleksyon. \nMr Assirvaden : Justement, juste avant les élections ! Vous voyez la pertinence de ces \namendements ? Je n’ai pas l’habitude de féliciter les gens trop facilement moi, mais là je suis \nobligé de féliciter ma collègue. \nMadame Speaker : Votre voisine. \nMr Assirvaden: C’est un fait que la pertinence est là. C’est précisément pour répondre \nà ce type de dérives – dérives de reward money – que les amendements proposés à la \nlégislation bancaire prennent toute leur sens ainsi la modification apportée à la section 26(2) \nde la Bank of Mauritius pourra désormais divulguer toute information nécessaire pour faire \nun signalement ou transmettre un dossier aux autorités. \nMadame la présidente, j’ai entendu, j’écoutais avec attention ce matin quand j’ai lu \nl’amendement la Banking Act, sections : 53, 64, 64A, 64B, 64C – je vous l’ai dit, il y a \nbeaucoup de technicité dans ces amendements. Quand j’ai écouté avec attention la réponse de \nl’honorable Premier ministre ce matin – Silver Bank. \nMr Bhagwan: Caverne Alibaba! \nMr Assirvaden: C’est vrai ! Moi, je pense que l’ancien Premier ministre a raison de se \ncacher ; il a raison de se cacher. \nAn hon. Member : Non, li pe tir latet soidizan la. \nMr Assirvaden: Non, il a0 raison de se cacher ! On ne le voit simplement que quand il \ny a des dépôts gerbe. Si aujourd’hui nous sommes en train de procéder à des amendements à \nla Banking Act, ce n’est pas un fruit du hasard.  \nVous réalisez ! De 2022 à 2023. Laissez-moi répéter ce que l’honorable Premier \nministre avait dit ce matin : de 2022 à 2023, 7 sociétés liées à un homme d’affaires indien, – \nj’ai oublié son nom –  \nHon. Members: Gupta ! \nMr Assirvaden: Gupta, l’ami de Padayachy ! Gupta, – ont obtenues des prêts toxiques \n– toxic loans – d’un montant variant de R 157 millions à R 200 millions chacun. Au total, R \n1.2 milliards qui a été débloqué par cette banque aujourd’hui en liquidation.  \nMs Anquetil: Scandaleux ! \nMr Assirvaden: Cela c’est le temps du MSM ! Et on voit aujourd’hui la pertinence de \nce que l’honorable membre emmène en ce qui concerne les amendements.  \nMadame la présidente, l’affaire Silver Bank n’est pas un cas isolé malheureusement, \npour le pays.  Elle est le symptôme d’un système MSM qui nécessitait une réforme en \nprofondeur. Ces amendements viennent précisément combler les lacunes qui ont permis \nl’émergence des tels abus en renforçant la transparence, la supervision et la coopération entre \ninstitutions. \nMadame la présidente, – je surveille mon heure – Maradiva !  \n(Interruptions) \nEncore une fois ! Le papa qui m’écoute ce soir ou la maman qui m’écoute ce soir – \nMaradiva : c’est votre argent qui a été dévalisé. \nMr Mohamed: Inn devaliz State Bank! \nMr Assirvaden: C’est l’argent de la State Bank, l’argent des fonctionnaires, R 470 \nmillions donnés à une compagnie que je ne connaissais même pas le nom, Dhyanavartam Ltd, \nplus connu sous Maradiva. \nMr Mohamed: Maha Diva. \nMr Assirvaden: Maha Diva ! Une affaire troublante ! R 470 millions accordés en \njuillet 2024 à la veille des élections générales par la State Bank of Mauritius. Dont le \npropriétaire est – on le connaît, le beau-frère du Premier ministre – lakwizin. \n(Interruptions) \nTon Georges ! l’ancien Premier ministre ! Oui, l’ancien Premier ministre ! \n(Interruptions) \nPour vous dire, Madame la présidente, que c’est précisément pour répondre à ce type de \nsituation que le projet de loi amende désormais la Companies Act en redéfinissant la notion \nde « beneficial owner ». Désormais il ne s’agit plus seulement du détenteur officiel d’action \nmais de toute personne qui contrôle réellement une société directement ou indirectement. \n Ce n’est pas fini, Madame la présidente ! Vous réalisez, au lendemain de la Covid-19 \nalors que le pays est encore meurtri, MIC – ils ont dévalisé. Quand j’étais juste à côté ici dans \nl’opposition, je me suis servi du mot « bangoler ». J’ai dû retirer ce mot par l’ancien Speaker \nquand j’avais dit qu’on a bangolé. Allez voir le mot « bangoler ». Bangoler tout ce que le \npeuple a travaillé pendant des années. Des transactions ! Ils ont bangolé d’abord, l’héritage \nde la population, dévalisé l’héritage de la population de plusieurs milliards de roupies sous le \nCovid-19 – selon leur réflexion pour aider les compagnies alors que c’était pour aider Pack & \nBlister, pour aider… Comment ? \nDr. Saumtally: Les amis d’enfance. \nMr Assirvaden: Les amis d’enfance, justement, R 2 milliards bangolés, Madame la \nprésidente. \nMr Bhagwan: Courtier Joomaye. \nMr Assirvaden: C’est dans cette optique, Madame la présidente, que nous saluons les \namendements amenés cet après-midi. Et ce n’est pas fini, je pense que les Mauriciens et les \nMauriciennes en général n’ont pas oublié l’affaire de Ambre Hôtel. \nAmbre Hôtel – le rachat de l’Ambre Hôtel a particulièrement, justement, retenu \nl’attention. Dans le cas de Ambre Hôtel, un accord conclu en 2022 pour un montant de R 2.1 \nmilliards a finalement donné lieu à un paiement de €48 millions en 2024, soit environ R 2. 4 \nmilliards. Et l’écart – l’honorable Premier ministre disait ça ce matin, l’écart – vous savez \nl’écart de combien ? R 300 millions ! R 300 millions qui a changé de compte. R 300 millions \nqui est sorti de sur un compte pour aller pour la commission. \nVous réalisez, Madame la présidente ? Un paiement en devises dans un contexte de \ntension sur les réserves soulève des questions fondamentales sur la transparence au temps du \nMSM, cela gouvernance au temps du MSM et l’opacité sous l’ancien régime MSM. \nEncore une fois, je salue ma collègue, mais ce n’est pas fini ! C’est malheureux pour ce \npays.  \nPeut-être, on a oublié, certains ont oublié dans ce pays, l’affaire bet365. Un Attorney \nGeneral, l’ancien Attorney General, Madame la présidente – un scandale financier sous \nl’ancien régime touchant l’ancien Attorney General qui s’est retrouvé au cœur de l’affaire \nbet365. \nUn moment de ce pays, et vous êtes étonnés que nous sommes visés, nous sommes sous \nla menace de grey listing de la FATF ? On ne peut pas être étonnés quand on a de telles \npersonnes pour diriger notre pays. Un Attorney General à un moment donné, fut accusé \nd’avoir facilité le déblocage des gains de plusieurs dizaines de millions de roupies auprès \nd’une plate-forme bet365, d’être intervenu. \nL’ancien Attorney General Ravi Yerrigadoo, avocat des Jugnauth, était intervenu au-\ndelà de ses fonctions, vous réalisez l’Attorney General ? D’avoir participé à la mise en place \nd’un montage financier international impliquant des comptes à Dubaï et en Suisse. \nMadam Speaker: L’ancien Attorney General! \nMr Assirvaden: L’ancien Attorney General! Vous réalisez à quel niveau d’Attorney \nGeneral on est tombé – on avait touché le fond à un moment donné. \n(Interruptions) \nMr Gunness: Limem li’nn vinn konseye dan State Bank. \nMr Assirvaden:  Comment ? Ah, il est dans le conseil de la State Bank ? Il était, il \nétait ! \nAn hon. Member : Il était consultant. \nMr Assirvaden:  Madame la présidente, le duty-free – mais il y en a beaucoup.  \nVous vous rappelez comment la population a souffert pendant la période de covid-19. \nLa période de Covid-19 restera l’un des moments les plus difficiles, les plus dur de notre \nhistoire récente. Elle a également relevé des pratiques profondément préoccupantes. Ainsi, la \npopulation a fait face à la peur. Vous vous rappelez ? A la maladie, à l’incertitude où au \nmoindre moment des contrats de plusieurs centaines de millions de roupie ont été attribués \npar la STC dans des conditions qui continuent d’interroger ; quincailleries, bijouteries, \nentreprises nouvellement créées ont obtenu des contrats. Et ces gens-là aujourd’hui osent \nnous pointer du doigt ! Ce MSM-là ose nous pointer du doigt quand des Rolex sont en \ncirculation partout dans des valises ?  \nJustement, ce contraste entre la détresse de la population et certaines décisions prises \ndans ce temps, dans l’attribution des marchés publics est profondément troublant. Ces \nsituations mettent en lumière l’importance des amendements récents à la Financial \nIntelligence and Anti-Money Laundering Act. Grâce à la section 10A, la FIU peut désormais \nsuspendre toute transaction suspecte et demander des informations supplémentaires, \nempêchant ainsi des flux financiers douteux de se concrétiser comme au temps du MSM et ce \nn’est pas fini. Mamy Ravatomanga, vous réalisez ? R 7,3 milliards ont été transférées sous le \nrégime du MSM. R 7,3 milliards effectuées à différentes périodes qui soulèvent des \ninterrogations majeures. Comment autant d’argent a pu atterrir sur des comptes ici à Maurice, \nsans qu’aucune institution ne voit rien. Aucun responsable ne voit, aucun Premier ministre \nqui est responsable suprême du pays ne voit rien ! Vous réalisez avec qui vous vous êtes \nassis ? Vous réalisez ? R 7,3 milliards… \n(Interruptions) \nMadame la présidente, vous voyez, je suis retourné un peu dans le passé. J’ai dû le faire \nsimplement pour que la population réalise dans quelle priorité nous amenons ces \namendements. La priorité est que nous faisons face à une menace et la menace est telle que \nnous devons mettre tout en pratique pour que les institutions fonctionnent, car sans des \ninstitutions fortes, crédibles, cohérentes, nous n’allons pas pouvoir faire avancer ce pays. \nMaurice, Madame la présidente, doit demeurer une juridiction respectée, fiable, exemplaire. \nA mon avis, c’est une question de souveraineté, c’est une question d’intégrité, c’est une \nquestion d’honneur nationale.    \nMadame la présidente, sincèrement, je suis heureux de soutenir pleinement ce projet de \nloi. Merci. \nMadam Speaker: Je vous remercie. Nous allons lever la séance pour une demie heure. \nAt 4.49 p.m., the Sitting was suspended.  \nOn resuming at 5.42 p.m., with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated! \n(5.43 p.m.) \nMr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne Longue): \nMadame la présidente, j’interviens sur ce projet de loi dans un contexte très particulier, \nprobablement historique parce que ce projet de loi suit la démission de l’ancien Deputy Prime \nMinister, l’honorable Paul Bérenger, qui a évoqué justement les raisons dont laquelle ce \nprojet de loi est emmené aujourd’hui au Parlement comme une des défaillances du \ngouvernement qui l’a poussé donc vers la sortie. C’est dans ce contexte, un Deputy Prime \nMinister qui démissionne au coût de son parti et de ses camarades de parti et… \n(Interruptions) \nAn hon. Member: To content. \nMr A. Duval: Mo krwar zis twa ki sagrin la. \nAn hon. Member: Les li trankil ! \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: Et donc… \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Je n’ai pas bien suivi. Il a démissionné au coût ? Qu’est-ce que vous \navez dit ? \nMr A. Duval: Au coût probable de son parti et son amitié qui le lie à ses camarades de \nparti – voilà un qui arrive – de longue date. Et donc, un exercice très particulier. \n(Interruptions) \nPas du tout ! Pas du tout ! Je m’explique, Madame la présidente. Donc, le Deputy Prime \nMinister quitte sa fonction, ses privilèges et bien sûr il quitte tout ce qu’il a acquis dans cette \ngrande et large victoire ; victoire sans équivoque. \nAn hon. Member: 60-0 ! \nMr A. Duval: De 60-0, exactement. 60-0, 19 députés au début et huit ministres. Il \nquitte tout cela, son poste de Deputy Prime Minister, son portefeuille. Il quitte tout cela et il… \nMadam Speaker: May I stop you for a minute? I can understand your introduction. \nMr A. Duval: Yes? \nMadam Speaker: But I will not allow you to speak for so long on the issue of hon. \nPaul Bérenger. \nMr A. Duval: Of course. I am getting to it. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, please! \nMr A. Duval: I am tying it… \nMadam Speaker: Please… \nMr A. Duval: Yes, no! \nMadam Speaker: …get to the… \nMr A. Duval: Absolutely, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Talk on the Bill! Talk on the Bill! \nMr A. Duval: Absolutely, what I am saying, Madam Speaker, is that he has done that in \nthe name of what? In the name of the fear of Mauritius being put on the FATF grey list. That \nis his reason amongst others. I put a question today to know the others, it has not come but \nthat is one reason and that is the reason reported by international press, financial and business \nmedia outlets organisations, Reuters, Bloomberg, Business Day, Binance amongst many \nothers. And what do they say? They say that he also mentioned the risk of Mauritius being \nplaced on regional anti-money laundering grey list covering, southern and eastern, as one of \nhis fer de lance for motivating his resignation, at the enormous cost that it turns out to be \ncosting him. Yet, it would have been a historic day for him to put these very objections on \nHansard today. And he is not here! \n(Interruptions) \nI hope that we will have the opportunity to hear because he owes it to the nation and to \nall those hundreds of thousands of people who voted for him, to know exactly… \nMadam Speaker: You are still… I am sorry? \nMr A. Duval:  …his objections. \nMadam Speaker: Will you sit down for a minute? \nMr A. Duval: Yes. \nMadam Speaker: Will you sit down? \nMr A. Duval: Yes. \nMadam Speaker: I am sorry, you are still on a political landslide. You are not talking \nabout the Bill. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, I have listened to hon. Patrick Assirvaden – you have \ntoo –, I have not once heard any section or any provision being referred to. \n(Interruptions) \nThat being the case, Madam Speaker, I am moving on. My point has been made, and it \nis not a point against you, hon. Assirvaden. The point I am trying to make is… \nMadam Speaker: It is against me! \nMr A. Duval: …that we owe it to the nation… \nMadam Speaker: It is against me! \nMr A. Duval: Especially, when we have cited these as the main thrust of a resignation, \nto come and debate here in the House and explain. He went as far as to say that this Bill, \nalthough a step in the direction, is not nearly enough to combat corruption and money \nlaundering in this country. So, I hope that he will enlighten us. \nThat being said, Madam Speaker, this Bill – and that will be my main contention today \n– is nothing but a cosmetic arrangement to please the FATF. Why? Because the existing legal \nprovisions under the many legislations – I will get to that –, the FCC Act, the FIAMLA, the \nFSC Act and under all the other legal provisions, which are being amended under this \nMiscellaneous Provisions Bill, already give adequate powers to law enforcement agencies \nand to reporting agencies. While they have those powers, not nearly enough is being done, \neither by this administration or previous administrations. I will get to it. \nWhat is the current legislative framework that we have? Let us look at the FCC Act, \nwhich is a part of this Bill. You will see, Madam Speaker, section 36, money laundering, that \n– \n“Any person who – \n“(a)  engages in a transaction which involves property, [whether] in whole or in part, \ndirectly or indirectly, (…) represents the proceeds of a crime;” \n Then – \n“where he suspects or has reasonable grounds to suspect that the property is derived or \nrealised, in whole or in part or directly or indirectly, from any crime, shall commit an \noffence and shall, on conviction, be liable to a fine not exceeding 20 million rupees and \nto penal servitude not exceeding 10 years.”  \nThat is section 36. \nThen, there is section 52, Obligations of legal persons, to be read with section 2. What \nis a legal person? It means any entity, including a private entity other than a natural person, \ntherefore, other than a physical person. So, section 52, Obligations of legal persons, Madam \nSpeaker – \n“(1)  A legal person shall ensure that it has adequate procedures in place, which are \nreasonably necessary, to prevent it or any person acting on its behalf from committing \nan offence under this Part, failing which it shall commit an offence on conviction, be \nliable to a fine not exceeding 20 million rupees.”  \nThat is for the company.  \nThere is a subsection (2) to section 52 – \n“(2) The Commission, may, after consultation with the relevant supervisory \nauthority, issue appropriate guidelines to a legal person on the adequate procedures \nwhich the legal person shall put in place (…).”  \nI will come to it later. That is for the FCC to do.  \nThen, there is section 53, Liability of legal persons – \n“(1)  A legal person shall be guilty of an offence under this Part if any of its \ndirectors, senior managers or any other persons involved in its management, or any of its \nofficers, agents or representatives having authority to act on its behalf, commits an offence \nunder this Act for the benefit of the legal person.” \nFinally, there is section 56, which is being amended under this Act, Referrals to \nCommission, that is, to the Financial Crimes Commission – \n“(1) Notwithstanding any other enactment, where in the discharge of his functions – \n(j)  \nany other person,” \nIt applies to legal persons, then, that person – \n“has reasonable grounds to suspect that an offence under this Act or the Declaration of \nAssets Act has been, or is being likely to be committed, he shall refer [that is, including \nthat legal person] the matter to the Commission for investigation.” \nThere is an offence provided under section 141, where you fail to comply. So, that is \nthe existing legal framework that has existed since the coming into force of the FCC Act. \nLet us look at section 52 (2), where the Commission may come with guidelines. The \nAct imposes an obligation on any person to adhere to those guidelines. Yet, there is a \ndiscrepancy, which is very important to understand, in the application of this Act by the FCC. \nI will get to this, but first, I will say on record that I commend the FCC for the work it has \nbeen doing so far. I think that the FCC is doing a commendable work. It is regrettable that the \nDirector is still operating in an interim capacity, under a 9-month contract, which is about to \nexpire. I hope that the Prime Minister will see to it that this situation can no longer continue \nand that a full-fledged director ought to be appointed at the FCC. \nThat being said, let me come to the guidelines, which the very same FCC, under that \nDirector, has published. I will say, Madam Speaker, that these guidelines show that the FCC \ndid not properly understand and implement its mandate under section 52 (2) – which I have \npreviously read –, which imposes an obligation. The distinction between “shall” and “may” \nor “should” is a great one. \nMadam Speaker, the guidelines published by the FCC are guidelines which, again, \nguide legal persons, that is, all those private entities operating in various sectors in Mauritius, \nwhich deal with persons who may be dealing with illicit money, with proceeds of crimes.  \nAbout the guidelines, unfortunately, Madam Speaker, I was expecting the Minister to \ncome and clarify this very essential aspect of enforcement, what the Anti-Money Laundering \n(Miscellaneous Provisions) aims. Let us not forget, it aims to improve the country’s \nefficiency in combatting criminality, including money laundering, and to put in place the \nnecessary measures and safeguards to make it more difficult. Then, you would assume that \nthe Minister would have realised the discrepancy between the guidelines, which use terms \nlike “may”.  \nLet me read for you to illustrate. Principle 2, for example, the Conduct of risk \nassessment, which is essential in ensuring that we can detect and that we can stop any illicit \ntransaction by the legal entity. It says – \n“15. For the purposes of the assessment, the following, which are not limitative, may be \nconsidered:” \nThese are the words chosen under the guidelines: “may be considered”. It gives different, \nvery essential points, I must say, in its guidelines. For example – \n“(…) it is recommended that Legal Person conduct and document any risk assessment \nat such intervals which is appropriate for the sector in which the Legal Person operates \nand, when there is a change in law or circumstance in the business, to identify, analyse, \nassess, prioritize its internal and external Part III FCCA Offence risks.” – that is, Part \nIII of the FCC Act.  \nIt also says, another example, that depending on the size of the organisation, the higher the \nrisk, the bigger the size, then it ought to be proportionate to the extent to which you place \nresources and, of course, that you adhere to these measures. \nBut the very problem of the guidelines, Madam Speaker, and this is what I am trying to \nillustrate, is that these guidelines are merely recommendations. It uses words like “may”: the \ncompany “may” adopt, the company “may” report, “the company may report” if it finds that \nthere is a prête-nom, the company “may” report if he thinks that there is the use or financing \nof drug money. It “may” do that. That is the FCC saying that. And the law says “it shall”, “the \ncompany shall”. The Commission may after consultation the relevant supervisory authority \nissue appropriate guidelines to a legal person which the legal person “shall” put in place.  \nSo, there is a huge problem, firstly, with what the FCC is doing as per its mandate, a \nclear mandate, and how it is discharging it, implementing it. That is the first issue that I \nwould have hoped, would have been addressed under this Miscellaneous Provisions. I will \nillustrate the point. I said that the FCC is doing a tremendous work. I stand by it. We have all \nseen in the recent days and the recent weeks and the recent months, since this Government \nhas been in power, even before, the constant comings and goings. Comings for that matter, \nnot goings because Government had a good idea to dispose of proceeds of crimes which are \nbeing suspected pending trial. I support that as well. But the comings of vehicles in the \nhundred’s: boats, vehicles, motorcycles, luxury items. We are talking of luxury vehicles that \ncost more than a house. The public has seen, very recently, cars being bought at dealerships \nby one person, totalling Rs50-60 million for one person. Young persons with no professional \nbackground – funds channelling from the USA, coming to Mauritius. You said it, the hon. \nMinister did say that it is becoming more and more sophisticated. True, it is, and this is why \nyou need to adapt yourself to the changing framework of how money laundering is being now \nused to circumvent the existing framework. \nBut what do we see, Madam Speaker? We see people going to a car dealership, buying \n100 cars, Madam Speaker, – 100 cars! – in one transaction. We see cars in the millions being \nbought by people of dubious character, some with criminal records. \nMr Mohamed: Kisanla ti dan puvwar? \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: We see… la pe koz ene zafer 2025 la, twa ki ti dan puvwar ! Pe koz \n2025. 3 loto 50 milion 2025, publik pe guete ! \nMr Jhummun : Kan ti aster? \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: 2025 zisteman mo pe dir twa, avan mont tax ! \nPeople have seen it and, look, I am not criticising this Government. I am trying to get to \nthe crooks of the matter, myself. I am trying to give you my take on what I think should be \ndone to better the system. There clearly is an abuse of the system, Madam Speaker. Clearly! \nWe are chasing the dog’s tail and not tackling the problem head-on. What are we doing? We \nare looking at money laundering, the assets that it has been converted into. But what about \nthe money that has been laundered? The Rs50 million, when it went into the car dealership. \nIsn’t that laundered money? Should we not apply these various provisions that I have spoken \nabout to go into the crooks of the matter? If we want to make an example for FATF, if we \nwant to convince FATF that we are not simply swallowing what they are giving us, we are \ngoing over and above, looking at the Mauritian context, understanding the problem, realising \nthat we have an issue and addressing that issue, then we are doomed, Madam Speaker, and \nthe Deputy Prime Minister, démissionnaire aurait eu raison, finalement, if we are not doing \nit. \nWhat I am saying, Madam Speaker, is very simple and I hope the hon. Minister takes it \non board. It is about time that car dealers who deal in the millions, who have no reporting \nduty under the FIAMLA, no reporting duty. Although I have stated the reporting duty under \nthe FCC, it has never been applied. I had a question today coming in Parliament, I can \nalready give you the answer. Zero prosecutions have been laid under the various provisions \nthat I have cited. Zero prosecutions to any of those persons in this industry, zero! That is the \ntruth!  Therefore, what I was saying, Madam Speaker, we need to rethink the system. Car \ndealers have to have a mandatory reporting requirement under FIAMLA like a real estate \nagent does. How does it make sense that the real estate agent who is leasing a home for \nRs5,000, have to go for KYC, have to look at the source of wealth, have to look at all of these \nissues, but someone who is selling a car for Rs20 million, doesn’t? How does that make \nsense? And, we all know that the car industry is one which is the most flourishing, regardless \nof the measures. \nMadam Speaker, yes, the second issue is car leasing. I have listened attentively to the \nMinister’s reply. Madam Speaker, for car leasing, it is clear that, in fact, it was highlighted in \nthe ESAAMLG Mutual Evaluation Report of July 2018, you could see there was a problem. \nFor the last five years of that evaluation, there had been only three reports made by leasing \ncompanies of suspicious transactions, for the whole of five years. Today, the hon. Minister \nhas answered that for since 2020, the 9 domestic leasing companies, there has been only one \ninvestigation for serious deficiency. But we all know that all these cars are being financed by \nleasing companies. We all know as well that the reporting duty of leasing companies is and \nhas to be reviewed. How can a company who is involved in a cleaning service, which owns \nthree or four Toyota 4x4s, worth Rs3 million, have total assets of Rs10 million, have a sudden \ninflation of its revenues in the last five-six months, now, goes and subscribes to a leasing to \nbuy a luxury vehicles worth Rs50 million which have no connection to its business and it \ndoes not fit any essential purpose for its business? How can that person not be made to report \nthat transaction? How? \nMadam Speaker, I am pressed by time, I will finish on car rental companies. I hope the \nhon. Minister will take that on board. The latest investigation the FCC has shown. Car rental \ncompanies, 300 cars being owned by people who are suspected to be involved in money \nlaundering and drug transactions. Is it not time for a major review of car rental industry \ntogether with the FIU, the MRA, the FCC and all the other investigative and monitoring \nbodies so that we have an overall and a real audit and get an idea of the real situation? \nMadam Speaker, I will finish, since I have, unfortunately, to conclude, by saying this – \nI said that the situation, unfortunately, shows the failure of this administration and previous \nadministrations in dealing with the real issue. We have seen, Madam Speaker, that there have \nbeen persons who have taken advantage of the system, of the red-carpet treatment that has \nbeen offered in the past to invest massively in our economy. Who does not remember Álvaro \nSobrinho? Who does not remember Mamy Ravatomanga? \n(Interruptions) \nAnd, we have to agree, Madam Speaker, that there is no difference between the two. Both are \nbillionaires, both are politically exposed persons, both have been accused of embezzlement of \npublic funds in their respective countries. Both have been given red carpet treatment. \nMr Mohamed: Both MSM! \nMr A. Duval: Both! It doesn’t matter who it is… \n(Interruptions) \nYou have to realise… \nMr Jhummun: It matters… \n(Interruptions) \nMr A. Duval: Look! Look! I was not going into that. I was not going to go into that but \nhon. Assirvaden said something earlier. He maybe did not realise that this has been going on \nfor at least three administrations.  \nNow, I will tell you something. Both invested in multi-million if not billion rupees in \nthe property sector, the financial services sector, the banking sector. Both have been \nsubjected to investigation by international bodies and both have tarnished our financial \nservices sector in Mauritius and our reputation. And, both were not fit and proper and that \nought to have been known whether it is now for Mr Ravatomanga or previously for Mr \nSobrinho.  \nBut the question is – what is the Government willing to do about it? \nI asked a question to the hon. Prime Minister last time; I understand his reply. He \ncannot divulge the names of banks and the management companies and the property \ndevelopers because there is an ongoing investigation. I respect that but yet the question begs \nto be asked –  \nWhat is the government really willing to do about it? Is it willing to go into the depth of \nit? Is it willing to go and take exemplary measures against all those companies, top 100 \ncompanies? \nThe Prime Minister: You will see, this year itself.  \nMr A. Duval: I hope and I will hold you to it because I am talking with sincerity here. \nTop 100 companies that have been involved, that have facilitated and that ought to be taken \nto task under the existing framework.  \nTo conclude, Madam Speaker, we do not need 60 pages of laws. I did not have the time \nto come to the others. We do not need 60 pages of amendments that do absolutely nothing but \ncosmetic changes to please the FATF. What we need is what I have said, I have touched on \nthe issues; I have scratched the surface – is to be prepared to go where it matters.  \nWhat I am going to say, Madam Speaker, just to finish on that, I have seen the Courts \n(Amendment) Act. The FCC is doing a tremendous job; it is looking for about 30% increase \nin its budget. I hope that the courts be given 30% of their budget as well because the \nimpositions or the constraints that are being done under the courts, under this Miscellaneous \nProvision Act, to work a un pas fou et impossible given the constraints of materials and staff. \nAnd, the fact that they have only two courts that have to be shared by the FCD. \nThen, I hope, at the minimum, that we give 30% increase to the court in the upcoming \nbudget if we want to walk the talk and we want to speed up financial crimes in Mauritius to \nthe court and I will see that the government does so, and I will do that again in my budget \nspeech and I hope that you will allow me again more time. \nThank you, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much.  \nHon. Damry. Let us try and keep our time. I am trying to keep the time.  \n(6.09 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Finance (Mr D. Damry): Madam Speaker, allow me to set \nthe record straight after the fiction of a narrative exposed by hon. A. Duval. Let me lay down \nthe historical context for this Bill.  \nIn 2017, ESAAMLG conducted the mutual evaluation exercise for Mauritius and \nadopted the report in July 2018. Starting from October 2018, Mauritius was placed under an \nobservation period of one year with the obligation to implement 58 recommended actions. In \nNovember 2019, Mauritius submitted the post observation report and enacted amendments to \nthe AML-CFT-CPF Bill.  \nNotwithstanding the above, in 2020 – cry my beloved country. FATF determined that \nthe strategic deficiencies outweighed the reforms and placed Mauritius in the grey list. \nSubsequently, Mauritius was placed on the EU and UK blacklist. However, in 2021, FATF \ndetermined that Mauritius substantially implemented its action plan including amendments to \nits AML-CFT-CPF legislation and removed Mauritius from its grey list. Likewise, Mauritius \nexited the EU and UK blacklist in 2021 and 2022, respectively.  \nThen, the shit hit the fan. All hell broke loose. Whereas between 2022 and 2024, the \nauthorities were expected to initiate or complete 25 measurable enforcement and \neffectiveness actions, they failed to implement any single action. As a responsible \ngovernment, we initiated or completed all the 25 actions between November 2024 and now. 7 \nactions in 2025, 7 actions to date in 2026, 11 forthcoming actions in 2026 itself.  \nHon. A. Duval mentioned that this is a stand-alone Bill. Madam Speaker, this is not a \nstand-alone Bill. The Bill is part of 25 actions. These actions are so important to our nation, \nlocal and international industry stakeholders and FATF observers, that with your permission, \nMadam Speaker, I would like to list them, underscoring our strongest political commitment. \nIt is a bit technical but in the interest of international FATF observers, I would like to give the \nheadline 25 actions. It will be quick.  \nThe seven actions in 2025 – \n1. \nPublication of the 2nd National Risk Assessment Report; \n2. \nCompletion of the national strategy on AML-CFT and national action plan; \n3. \nDevelopment of a comprehensive roadmap for the 2027 Mutual Evaluation; \n4. \nSetting up of the Interministerial Committee on AML-CFT- CPF for the \npreparation of the 2027 Mutual Evaluation; \n5. \nThe registrar of cooperatives to start AML-CFT supervision of credit unions; \n6. \nDesignation of 3 persons based on the United Nations (Financial Prohibitions \nArms Embargo and Travel Ban) Sanctions 2019; \n7. \nReactivation of the Technical Assistance Coordination Committee for support \nfrom development partners. \nThe seven actions in 2026 in process – \n1. \nPromulgation of regulations \nand administrative penalties to sanction \nnoncompliance with AML-CFT; \n2. \nCompletion of the midterm mock evaluation; \n3. \nConstitution of a mutual evaluation team; \n4. \nEstablishment of a joint public committee on AML-CFT-CPF; \nI can go on but it is going to be long.  \nThe reason I am saying that is because this is what was supposed to be done by the \nprecedent government but they did not do it. We picked up the pieces and we have \nimplemented it.  \nMadam Speaker, it is with a lot of surprise that as a non-practicing barrister, I can relate \nto the crux of this Bill and I will submit that hon. A. Duval has completely missed the crux of \nthis Bill. Hon. A. Duval referred to a Mock Evaluation Report in 2018 but he failed to \nmentioned the Mock Evaluation Report of 2025, and in that report, 11 immediate outcomes to \nremedy deficiencies in the existing legislations were found. This is precisely why this Bill is \nbeing brought to remedy the deficiencies that the Mock Evaluation Report of 2025 has found, \nto remedy the deficiencies in terms of effectiveness, in all the legal frameworks that have \nbeen listed by hon. A. Duval.  \nMadam Speaker, we were all shocked by the reply of the hon. Prime Minister to the PQ \non Silver Bank this morning. The scale of institutional conspiracy to defraud our country is \nincredulous. I was even more shocked by the list of endless scandals raised by hon. \nAssirvaden in this same House, earlier today.  \nThis begs the question – \nWhat could have been the motive for zero action between 2022 and 2024? Could it be \nto cover up Silver Bank like Money Heist at the expense of livelihoods depending on our \nfinancial industry? What could be the motive for covering up or harbouring criminal \nnetworks that launder illicit funds through assets, as raised by hon. A. Duval. He referred to \nproperty and to motor vehicles. \nHad the previous government completed the 25 actions, had the previous government \ncompleted the national risk assessment that they were supposed to complete in 2022, they \ncould have identified the different assets that are used to launder illicit funds. But they did not \ndo so! In fact, the mock evaluation report for both 2018 and 2025 identified what, we call, \ndomestic non-financial businesses as a weakness. This forms part of it.  \nCriminal networks are very dynamic. They try to outwit/outsmart a system. They try to \nfind loopholes in the laws. This is exactly what they were doing with the precedent \nlegislations. This is the deficiencies in the laws that this Bill is remedying. This Bill will close \nthe loopholes that will allow these criminals to launder their funds. \nMadam Speaker, between November 2024 and as at date, over 300 vehicles valued in \nexcess of Rs218 million have been seized. Car leasing companies are under investigation. \nThe FCC is investigating 400 hundred cases of value Rs30 billion and contrast that with 800 \ncases of value Rs2 billion between November 2019 and November 2024.  \nOn the topic of cars, unfortunately, in the interest of time, I will not be able to cite these \ncases, but I would like to refer the House to two cases in Singapore. One is the 2.8 billion \nluxury vehicles scandal and the second one is the SRS Auto Investigation in 2025. \nEven a jurisdiction like Singapore only started combatting money laundering with \nregard to cars as from the late 2020s. The 2.8 billion luxury vehicle scandal – this case, in my \nhumble opinion, is a jurisprudence for effectiveness because intelligence, investigations, \nprosecution and asset recovery were completed in two years, Madam Speaker. Compare that \nwith the time taken in our jurisdiction. \nLet me reassure the House that our intelligence and enforcement agencies have been \nworking tirelessly in tracking high value assets that have been paid for by illicit cash. Madam \nSpeaker, my contention is that, this Bill provides for effectiveness enabled by a risk-based \nsupervisory framework around the four key elements of the AML/CFT/CPF value chain – \n• Intelligence; \n• Investigation; \n• Prosecution, and  \n• Asset recovery. \nOther speakers have sufficiently canvassed the technical details. So, in the interest of \ntime, I cannot list each amendment, but I will give you an example. For instance, the change, \nthe proposed amendment to the beneficial ownership goes deep because it is not only about \nknow your customer. It is also about know your business, which is a small change, but it has \ngiant implications. What hon. A. Duval was referring to, car leasing companies being used for \nmoney laundering, etc., you will be able to do that when you start tackling ‘know your \nbusiness.’ \nWhen you have cases like Prateek Gupta & co coming to Mauritius through the veil of \nmultiple legal entities through know your business, you will be able to track whether these \nbusinesses actually do what they actually mean to do. \nNow, with the advance in technology, a business can be safe.  Let us say, the business is \nin online entertainment, but when you go deep behind the business, it could be used for arms \ntrafficking or drug dealing. \nSo, this is one example of how this Bill brings effectiveness in combatting money \nlaundering, terrorism financing and proliferation financing. I have lot to say, but I do not have \nmuch time. So, I would like to respond to what hon. A. Duval said: ‘What is the Government \nwilling to do?’ Under the previous government, criminal networks outwitted and outsmarted \nauthorities in this financial jungle that we live in.  \nAllow me to send a stern warning to those criminals. We will hunt them down because \nthis is not their jungle, this is our jungle! And to drill down the point, let me take you to a real \njungle and tell you the story of the lion and the deer. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Damry: How many of you know that the maximum speed of a deer over a long \ndistance 60 mph, but the maximum speed of a lion over a long distance is only 40 mph. Yet, \nthe lion hunts deer all the time. What is the reason?  \nAn hon. Member: You are the deer! \nMr Damry: A lion prepares. \nMadam Speaker: Chut! Chut! \nMr Damry: A lion prepares; a lion is patient; a lion strategizes; a lion develops tactics. \nWhen the time is right, the lion accelerates to a maximum speed of 80 mph and hunts the \ndeer.  \nAn hon. Member: Be deer la lamem! \nMr Damry: Madam Speaker, enough of stag parties! We are the lions of this jungle and \nwe will nail down the criminals. The hon. Prime Minister has a track record. My word is my \nbond. I commend this Bill to the House.  \nLong live Mauritius!  Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Minister for respecting the time.  \nYes, hon. Parapen! \n(6.24 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Minister of Social Integration, Social Security, and \nNational Solidarity (Mr K. Parapen): Madam Speaker, history can be ironic at times. \nDuring colonial times, empires acted as bandits and plundered many economies. The aim was \nquite simple: to exploit the world’s resources to fund the expansion of empires. In this \nscheme of things, the colony was merely an extractor of wealth at the service of the almighty \ncolonial master. \nSo, it is definitely not a coincidence that major revolts in the colonies be it the Boston \nTea Party of December 16, 1773, or even Mahatma Gandhi’s Salt March of 1930, all had to \ndo with taxation. After all, taxation is the lifeblood of organised societies. Who gets taxed and \nby how much one gets taxed is often a reflection of how societies organise and in whose \ninterest it is working. \nUnder colonial rule, the colonies faced many taxes as the aim was to repatriate as much \nas possible to the heart of the empire. Who would have thought, then, that many of the same \ncolonies who were victims of colonialism would shake the very foundation of these former \nempires many years later by running light fiscal regimes. History can indeed be ironic at \ntimes. As the biggest and most powerful economies of the world witnessed the significant \nmovement of financial flows from their own network toward the network of countries which \noptimise tax avoidance, the so-called race to the bottom – they had to react and react, they \ndid. \nMauritius is not a member of the FATF, has never been and probably never will be but, \nyet, here it is – Mauritius, that is, modifying an array of enactments ahead of the 2027 \nevaluation by FATF. \nThe FATF was set up in 1989 by G7 countries and, to date, it has 40 members, only 40. \nPrimarily, the largest economies of the world. The FATF is one of the ways that the \ndeveloped world has devised to influence policy-making in other jurisdictions especially \nthose willing to engage in the race to the bottom. Its Grey List is a powerful tool that can \nconvince even the most reluctant of regimes into action. The previous MSM regime could \ntestify. The inclusion of the concept of ecocide in Environment Act is concrete proof that the \nFATF, and by extension, the developed world, is exercising major influence on the rest of the \nworld. \nAs a political activist with Rezistans ek Alternativ, I have been involved over the last 15 \nyears in numerous grassroots struggles involving environmental causes, most notably, an \nongoing legal battle against New Mauritius Hotels which started in 2018 where my two-party \ncomrades, David Sauvage and Stephan Gua, along with them, we have been fighting in the \ncourts for the preservation of wetlands of critical importance at Les Salines, Rivière Noire. \nNot to forget my involvement in the “Say No to Coal”, fighting the construction of CT Power \non the shores of Montagne Jacquot near Pointe aux Sables, years before I would eventually \nbecome a representative of Constituency No.1. \nI have also been actively involved in the “Aret Kokin Nu Laplaz” movement against the \nbeach grabbing at Pomponette which culminated with the re-proclamation of a Pomponette \nbeach as a public beach following the Alliance du changement historic win in November \n2024. \nThroughout these years of activism, I have been a prime witness of lacklustre effort of \nMauritian policymakers in addressing the environmental challenges of our time. There is so \nmuch to be done to protect our environment from looters and destroyers. \nAs a matter of fact, the inclusion of nature’s rights in our Constitution is one of the \nmain demands of Rezistans ek Alternativ prior to joining the Alliance du changement as we \nrecognise the urgency to protect our fragilised natural environment in the epoque of \nAnthropocene. \nIt will, therefore, not come as a surprise to you, Madam Speaker, that my party, \nRezistans ek Alternativ, is enthused by the amendment to the Environment Act being \nproposed in this Bill. The inclusion of ecocide as a crime in our laws will go a long way \ntoward safeguarding our environment, keeping it safe from predators. \nHowever, if the hon. Leader of the Opposition was referring to my political party when \nhe alluded that the amendment to the Environment Act was made to please, as he said, a \nmember of the Alliance du changement, then I think that he is misinformed. As much as \nRezistans ek Alternativ welcomes this timely addition of ecocide in the Environment Act, this \nis being done in the context of improving the country’s efficiency in combating criminality. \nThis is being done with the Financial Action Task Force breathing down our neck. \nIn cruder terms, the criminalisation of such destructive human behaviour in our \nEnvironmental Law is the doing of international capitalism. This marks an alignment with a \nstrategy shift of the FATF which started in 2012, that is treating environmental destruction \nnot just as a regulatory breach but as a predicate offence for money laundering. \nIt is estimated that environmental crimes generate between US$110 billion and US$281 \nbillion annually making it the world’s fourth-largest criminal activity. Such a strategy shift \ndid not, however, fall from the sky; it represents the courageous, relentless and principled \nstance taken by progressive movements across the globe over the years with NGOs like \nGlobal Witness and Tax Justice Network being leading, prominent examples. These \norganisations have since long denounced the exploitation of resources of the Global South by \nthe Global North, be it corporates or criminal syndicates that have pushed for stricter \nenvironmental laws in the Global South to neutralise them. \nAllow me, today, to pay tribute to all the progressive climate and environmental \nactivists around the world for their unflinching determination to preserve mankind’s greatest \nasset: Planet Earth.  \nThe growing influence of international capitalism on the affairs of Mauritius is evident, \nand it is worth pondering at whose expense is this happening. Is it happening at the expense \nof the country’s historical, local oligarchy. One thing is clear though, with the introduction of \nthe ecocide in the Environment Act, the FAFT has managed a feat which the historical local \nbourgeoisie will never have sanctioned. Can this be termed as progress? \nIn reality, two international institutions, emanating from international capitalism \nnamely, the Financial Action Task Force and Moody's, the rating agency, have seemingly \ncoerced Mauritius into addressing long-standing issues which local institutions have \nrepetitively failed to address, that is, improve legislations to combat criminality linked to \nmoney laundering and deep structural economic reforms, respectively, failing which the \ncountry will likely be sanctioned either by a grey-listing in the case of the FAFT or a \ndowngrading to  Junk Status in the case of Moody’s. \nWhy is it, then, that we respond to international institutions in such a strikingly \ndifferent way? Could it be that the offshore sector is progressively becoming the main pillar \nof our economy, and, as such, we are obliged to comply to such requirements that will keep \nthe offshore sector thriving because as much as we are appreciative of the ecological \nlegislative progress, Madam Speaker, we remain wary of the ramification of an ultra-\ndominant offshore sector. \nWith your permission, Madam Speaker, allow me to table this article from the \nnewspaper ‘The Atlantic’, published on 28 July 2016 and the title of which reads ‘Why tax \nheavens are political and economic disasters’, written by Mrs Brooke Harrington, a \nDartmouth College Economic Sociology Professor and a PHD holder from Harvard \nUniversity. It provides ample evidence of numerous countries which sought prosperity \nthrough lax business and tax regulations which eventually made them and their respective \npopulation worse off. This article has had a profound influence on my understanding of \noffshore centres and I sincerely hope that many will consult the article tabled to catch a \nglimpse of the often-untold reality of offshore centres. The offer goes as far as evoking a \nfinance curse, a paradox of plenty similar to the resource curse suffered by many African \ncountries, whereby the plentiful availability of a resource does not, unfortunately, improve \nthe living conditions of the masses as one would come to expect.  \nIt is often said in business quarters or even on mainstream platforms that the offshore \nsector is the biggest tax contributor in Mauritius. That is not true. The main contributor to \ntaxes in Mauritius is the population which has, since the advent of the light fiscal regime, \nassociated with the offshore sector, shouldered a disproportionately large tax burden, mainly \nthrough value added taxes and other indirect taxes. In his first budget, the hon. Prime \nMinister and Minister of Finance unveiled a new fiscal strategy, whereby the population \nwould not shoulder a disproportionate fiscal burden. Instead, additional direct taxes were \nintroduced, mainly through fair share contributions, so as to rebalance the fiscal effort \nbetween direct and indirect taxes. Should the offshore sector evolve into a dominant pillar of \nthe economy, it is only fair that Government taxes further the wealth that the industry \ngenerates, be it through the profitability it generates for locally based companies or through \nthe income of its employees; failing which, it is very likely that Mauritius will endure the \nsame feat as numerous tropical Caribbean countries, that is, state capture by the wealthiest \nand let us face it, they are not the most ethical beings on the planet. \nBack in 2017, my electoral campaign at the by-elections of Quatre Bornes would focus \nexclusively on the risk of gentrification for the Mauritian society. Nearly 10 years later, there \ncan be no debate that our society is in a full-blown gentrification process; soaring property \nprices amidst a mushrooming of gated communities, exodus of the youth and often the most \neducated of them and an ever-increasing cost of living for the average Mauritian. Over this \ntime, the offshore sector has thrived, this is a reality we cannot depart from. The critical \nquestion we need to ask is whether the offshore sector has been a boon or a curse for our \nsociety. By our society, I mean the average Mauritian who earns less than Rs25,000 monthly \nand who can barely make ends meet. Has he benefitted from the billions of dollars which \nhave transited through our economy over the years? If the answer is no, then we need to go \nback to the drawing board, Madam Speaker. What can we do as policy makers to ensure that \nthe country as a whole benefit from the offshore sector? After all, economic growth is more \ntangible when it is served on a plate rather than through pompous speeches. \nMadam Speaker, I also want to discuss an amendment being brought to the Declaration \nof Assets Act in section 10(3) where a new subsection is being added and I quote – \n“(3) Notwithstanding subsection (1), where a person fails to submit a declaration within \nthe specified period and thereafter, makes a voluntary declaration, he shall not be liable \nto any penalty, provided that he is not the subject matter of an investigation under this \nAct.” \nI believe such an amendment is contrary to the spirit in which the Bill is being \npresented. To put it blandly, if there is no cost for being late, then there is no incentive to be \non time. Allow me to share my personal experience. Back in June 2025, I sold a property to \nadjust to my new financial reality of being an MP. However, it was not until November 2025 \nthat I notified the FCC of the sale of a property. I had mistakenly assumed that only \nacquisition of assets should be disclosed to the FCC. My mistake, I fully accept it. Ignorance \nof the law is not an excuse, so I had to fork out Rs25,000 to settle the fine imposable as per \nthe Declaration of Assets Act. \nMadam Speaker: Maybe everybody is hearing this. So, nobody else will do that. \nMr Parapen: I have now learned my lesson, an expensive lesson be it and you can be \nsure that if there is a next time, I will comply with the law within the 30 days provided. \nHowever, if this amendment in this Bill goes through, I would not have been liable to any \nfine as long as I voluntarily declare the disposal of the asset to the FCC with no time bar. \nWith the new provision, I could potentially acquire an asset in year 1 of the mandate, dispose \nof it in year 4 of the mandate, pocket some non-taxable capital gains in the meantime and not \nnotify the FCC at all without incurring any fine whatsoever. This is clearly not right and I \nhave raised the issue with both the Minister of Financial Services and the Attorney General \nand I am comforted that they will both look into the matter and consider bringing appropriate \namendments at committee stage. \nSo, to conclude, Madam Speaker, the Bill in front of the House today once voted, will \ndefinitely bolster the arsenal of laws aimed at combatting criminality and the Minister of \nFinancial Services needs to be given the credit she deserves for presenting such a \ncomprehensive piece of legislation. But in reality, the main issue of our offshore sector is not \nso much in the laws that govern it but rather in the effectiveness of the implementation of \nthese laws. \nMadam Speaker, having witnessed le branle-bas général ahead of the evaluation by the \nFATF in early 2027, the cynical part in me cannot but ask the following question; what if our \npublic institutions were under perpetual evaluation? Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much. Hon. Seeburn! \n(6.44 p.m.) \nMr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle): Thank you, \nMadam Speaker. I rise today to express my strong support for the proposed legislation on \nAnti-Money Laundering, Combating the Financing of Terrorism and Countering Proliferation \nFinancing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill introduced by the hon. Minister of Finances and \nEconomic Planning. The Bill is a comprehensive framework designed to strengthen \nMauritius’ financial integrity, align our laws with international standards and ensure that our \neconomy remains transparent, resilient and well regulated.  \nMadam Speaker, Mauritius has over decades carefully built its reputation as a credible, \nstable and well-regulated international financial centre. That reputation did not come by \nchance. It is the result of deliberate policy choices, institutional strengthening and continuous \nengagement with the global financial system. However, in today’s world, reputation is not \nstatic. It must be constantly protected, reinforced and renewed. This is precisely what this Bill \nseeks to achieve. It introduces amendments to various laws to cover the full spectrum of \nfinancial institutions, corporates, non-profit organisations and public sector to improve the \nefficiency of Mauritius in combating criminality, money laundering, terrorism financing and \nproliferation financing. \nMadam Speaker, we operate in a global financial environment where transparency, \naccountability and compliance are fundamental requirements. As a responsible jurisdiction, \nMauritius must align itself with the standards set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). \nFor the first time, I heard, Madam Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, at the very outset of \nhis speech, stating that this Bill is necessary. He further stated that Mauritius was placed on \nthe grey list in February 2020 when the previous government was in power, but did not \ncomment further on the real consequences of this downgrading.  \nThis is what happened, Madam Speaker. In fact, the previous government and the \nMinister of Financial Services had failed to take the necessary steps on time, which led \nMauritius to be placed on the grey list in February 2020 by the Financial Action Task Force. \nMauritius was then placed under increased monitoring. This enormously affected the \ninvestors’ confidence. It further affected the reputation of Mauritius as a credible financial \ncentre, which further led to strictest scrutiny from international partners. Furthermore, actions \ntaken by the European Union demonstrated that reputational risks had translated directly into \neconomic risks, affecting investment flows, increasing the cost of doing business and placing \npressure on the financial institutions. \nMadam Speaker, the Bill responds to the past shortcomings. It strengthens supervisory \npowers. It improves information sharing and ensures that our institutions are better equipped \nto detect, investigate and act against illicit financial activities. In summary, Madam Speaker, \nclause 2 to clause 8 of the Bill lay down the foundation of a robust and uncompromising \nframework to combat money laundering, terrorism financing and proliferation financing. \nThey decisively strengthen the powers of the Bank of Mauritius and impose strict obligations \non our banks, companies, cooperatives to uphold transparency, conduct proper due diligence \nand report suspicious transactions without delay.  \nAt the same time, the Bill reinforces the authority of our courts to act swiftly, including \nfreezing illicit assets, enhance accountability through stricter assets declaration requirement \nfor public officials and extend vigilance to environmental activities, highlighting the offence \nof ecocide – as emphasised by hon. Parapen earlier to environmental activities – to ensure \nthat criminal elements cannot exploit our natural resources for illicit gains. These provisions \nsend a clear and unequivocal message: that Mauritius will not tolerate abuse of its financial \nand institutional system. \nClause 9 of the Bill brings clarity, coherence and effectiveness to an institution that is \nalready central to our financial crime framework. In a world where illicit financial flows are \nincreasingly sophisticated and transnational, it would be irresponsible for this House to leave \ngaps, overlaps or uncertainty in the mandate of the Financial Crimes Commission. Clause 9 \nensures that our enforcement architecture is properly coordinated and capable of meeting \nboth domestic expectations and international obligations. \nClause 10 of the Bill introduces important amendments to the Financial Intelligence \nUnit and Anti-Money Laundering Act, reinforcing the preventive and reporting framework \nthat underpins our fight against financial crimes. By enhancing obligations, clarifying \ncompliance mechanisms and strengthening the role of reporting entities and supervisory \nbodies, this provision ensures that suspicious financial activities are more effectively \nidentified, reported and acted upon. This is a necessary step to ensure that our legislative \nframework remains robust, responsive and fully aligned with evolving international \nstandards. \nMadam Speaker, in summary, clause 11 to clause 24 of the Bill seem to be closing gaps \nby strengthening enforcement and extending oversight across every key sector of our \neconomy. In general, it empowers our enforcement and intelligence agencies to detect, \ninvestigate and act decisively against financial crimes while tightening reporting standards \nand governance requirements for financial institutions, foundations and higher risk sectors \nsuch as gambling real estate sectors. These provisions further enhance transparency in \ntaxation payment systems for companies, for trusts and associations, and fully ensure full \ndisclosure of beneficial ownership and enable the effective implementation of international \nsanctions.  \nTaken together, these measures are not merely technical amendments. Madam Speaker, \nthey are a stronger statement of intent that Mauritius will remain a transparent, credible and \nfully compliant international financial centre, where integrity is protected and where illicit \nactivity has no place. What becomes clear is that this Government is taking concrete and \ndecisive action where it truly matters.  \nThe strengthening of beneficial ownership transparency will put an end to the abuse of \nopaque corporate structures by those who seek to hide behind anonymity. The enhanced \nreporting obligations will ensure that suspicious activities are flagged earlier and dealt with \nmore effectively. At the same time, the Bill gives greater teeth to our regulatory and \nenforcement authorities, enabling them to act firmly against those who attempt to undermine \nour financial system. \nMadam Speaker, this Bill is fundamentally about safeguarding the future of Mauritius \nas a jurisdiction, integrated into the global financial system. By strengthening our legal \nframework, we are sending a clear signal that Mauritius is a clean, transparent and has \nresilient financial centres. This will enhance investors’ confidence, secure our access to \ninternational banking system and support sustainable economic growth. This is not a merely \nlegislative exercise, but also, a strategic investment in the long-term stability and prosperity \nof our country.  \nWe must continuously align with the standards of the Financial Action Task Force to \npreserve our credibility and competitiveness. Failure to do so will expose our country to \nreputational damage, reducing investors’ confidence and potential economic consequences, \nas seen in the past with actions being taken by bodies such as the European Union and the \nFinancial Action Task Force. The classical example is what happened with the operation of \nSilver Bank in Mauritius, as stated by the Prime Minister earlier. It is now clear that stricter \nregulation is necessary to prevent future crisis. \nThis Bill is about ensuring that honest businesses are protected while those who are \nengaging in illicit activities find no place in Mauritius. These provisions send a strong \nmessage that this Government will not tolerate financial crimes as we are fully committed to \nprotecting the integrity, credibility and future of our economy. By strengthening our laws, we \nare not only complying with the international standards, but also, protecting our society, our \ninstitutions and our future.  \nIt is also important to situate this Bill, Madam Speaker, within the broader international \ncontext. When we examine leading jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom, the United \nStates and Australia, we find the continuous strengthening of legal and regulatory framework \nto combat money laundering, terrorism financing and proliferation risks. In the United \nKingdom, for instance, there has been a strong emphasis on beneficial ownership, \ntransparency and the tightening of corporate accountability through reforms to company \nregisters and enforcement mechanism. In the United States, authorities have significantly \nenhanced oversight through measures such as stricter reporting requirements and expanded \npowers to tract illicit financial flows, particularly under anti-money laundering reforms. \nSimilarly, Madam Speaker, Australia has moved towards reinforcing its regulatory regime, \nincluding closer supervision of reporting entities and expanding the scope of regulatory net \nand enhancing supervision across various sectors. \nMadam Speaker, the lesson is simple. Even the most advanced economies in the world \nare constantly evolving to address new and emerging risks. The French President, Emmanuel \nMacron, had constantly advocated for deeper European Union financial integration and \nstronger oversight with the legislation. Christine Lagarde, the President of the European \nCentral Bank, one of the most influential leaders, strongly supports regulations and further \nencourages balancing stability with innovation. Mauritius must do the same and this Bill \nensures that we do not lag behind but rather, remain aligned with global best practices.  \nThis legislation is also about sending a strong and unambiguous signal to the \ninternational community. It says that Mauritius is committed to transparency, accountability \nand is committed to maintaining the highest standard of financial integrity. This Government \nhas chosen to position Mauritius as a forward looking responsible and resilient jurisdiction. \nThis legislation strengthens our legal architecture. It reinforces our credibility on the \ninternational stage and further secures the foundations for a sustainable economic growth.  \nBefore I conclude, Madam Speaker, allow me to express my sincere thanks to the hon. \nMinister and the State Law Office for coming forward with this progressive piece of \nlegislation, and, also, to thank all those who have spoken before me in support of this \nproposed legislation. This Bill is not just about compliance and regulation; it is about the \nfuture of Mauritius. It is to ensure that our country continues to thrive in a highly competitive \nglobal environment. In a world of uncertainty, one thing must remain certain that Mauritius \nstands for integrity, credibility and excellence. We choose integrity. We choose credibility. We \nchoose progress. \nWith these words, Madam Speaker, I thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you so much.  \nHon. Narsinghen! \n(6.57 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International \nTrade (Mr H. Narsinghen): Madam Speaker, thank you for giving me the floor. \nLooking at the body language of the iron lady, I understood that I cannot be too long. I \nhave fully understood. Therefore, … \nMadam Speaker: You see an iron lady somewhere? \nMs Anquetil: Where is she? \nMr Narsinghen: The Whip! \nSo, I don’t want to be whipped! \nSo, Madam Speaker, normally as an ex-academic, I usually give a plan, so I will start \nwith a plan. So, I will give a short rebuttal to the hon. Leader of the Opposition and to my \ngood friend the hon. A. Duval, and then, subsequently, I will come to the rationale behind the \namendments, and also try to explain the distinction between financial stability as opposed to \nfinancial integrity because my intention, here, Madam Speaker, I know we have got seven-\neight lawyers in the House, a number of economists, a number of accountants. So, my \nintervention is not to explain to these learned friends but to the population. Then I would like \nto comment on international organisations and in my rebuttal, I will not rebut one of my \ncolleagues from Government but I would beg to differ on certain comments made on FATF \nand the ESAAMLG and also comments made that Mauritius should not exploit African \ncountries. On the contrary, we have developed a strategy, the hon. Prime Minister, the ex-\nDeputy Prime Minister, my colleague Mr Ramful and myself, we have been going to Africa, \nto explain to all the stakeholders, many countries that they have to use Mauritius as a \nplatform to invest in Africa and be equitable to our African brothers and sisters. \nSo, it is important to understand, in spite of the fact that we can be critical towards \ninternational organisations, FATF, and even the World Bank and IMF, we have to understand \nthat we are a small jurisdiction, so we have to be careful. Also, I would like to bring some \ncomparative perspectives and then go on some technical points if I have time.  \nNow, normally I don’t crack jokes but since I know all of you are tired, I listened \ncarefully to our good friend hon A. Duval, I don’t know if he still remembers zoli mamzel. Do \nyou remember the story of zoli mamzel? He was referring to cosmetic amendments.  \nIf you look at the Bill, Madam Speaker, it contains 69 pages – not 6! It is harping on \nmore than 20 different legislations. Just like hon. Patrick Assirvaden, normally, I don’t like to \neasily congratulate people but I have to confess that the team, not only the Minister, her team \nand herself has done a very good job.  \nNow, coming to the second point raised by hon. A. Duval – he mentioned about \nguidelines. I think we have to make a clear distinction between what is hard law, Madam \nSpeaker, as opposed to guidelines. Guidelines, normally, should be couched in a language \nwhere you are using best endeavour standards and there is no need to use words like ‘shall’, \nyou may use ‘may’ because these are guidelines and guidelines are meant to be guidelines. \nNow, coming to the hon. Leader of the Opposition, I listened to him, I was expecting \nmore solid and constructive contribution. Unfortunately, I could not really hear some serious \ncriticisms. Normally, we give, Madam Speaker, seven days for people to reflect unless there \nis a Certificate of Urgency and it is sad to note that the Leader of the Opposition failed to \nunderstand the logic of including ecocide in the Bill. Ecocide is related to money laundering \nand even in sophisticated economies, waste management companies use their companies as a \nconduit for money laundering. Secondly, I think the hon. Leader of the Opposition has failed \nto understand that a delicate balance has to be struck between promoting a sound global \nbusiness sector whereby we have to attract capital and investment versus combating money \nlaundering. It is easy to talk but not easy to strike that balance. \nSo, certainly, the Bill is not perfect but I think the right balance has been struck. I can \nunderstand, I, myself, could have levelled certain criticisms but we have to understand that a \nsort of delicate balance has to be struck. I think that the hon. Minister is taking a sort of \nincremental approach.  \nNow, let me come to a very important point which has to be driven. It is of paramount \nimportance, Madam Speaker, to preserve the integrity of the financial services. It is the \nfinancial integrity, not only at the international level, but also at the national level. At the \nsame time, Mauritius has to be fully compliant with international standards set by \ninternational organisations, be it the World Bank, the IMF, and, above all, the Financial \nAction Task Force, and the Eastern and Southern African Anti-Money Laundering Group – \nthis is a regional organisation. \nThe financial system, Madam Speaker, in Mauritius, cannot act in isolation, it has to \npay heed to other financial systems, be it at regional level and also at the international level. \nIf mismanaged, you will see, it will contaminate the whole global financial system and it will \nhave far reaching effects and rippling effects. To have a comprehensive understanding, it will \nbe also apposite to understand a few concepts. Like also financial stability and financial \nstability is of utmost importance for Mauritius. \nNow, coming to the international organisation, which one of my colleagues from \nGovernment criticised, it is important to understand that, yes, we may level certain criticisms \nagainst these organisations but as a small jurisdiction, – don’t forget, we are a small dot in the \nIndian Ocean – we cannot afford to disregard inter-governmental organisations be it the FATF \nor IMF or the World Bank or the Eastern and Southern African Anti-Money Laundering \nGroup. So, we have to accept the international standards which have been imposed by the \nFATF and, Madam Speaker, we certainly cannot ignore these standards.  \nMadam Speaker, Mauritius is not US, Mauritius is not China, Mauritius is not Russia, \nthat is, it is not an autarchy entirely self-sufficient and economically self-contained. The \nFATF, as you know, is a global watchdog for money-laundering and financing of terrorism \nand now mass weapon financing. In such international standards with more than 40 \nrecommendations, the main objective as we know, is to combat illicit financial floats.  \nFounded in 1989 and based in Paris, it provides operational measures to protect the \nintegrity of the financial system. It sets strict standards and countries must use them as \nbenchmark. It carries also, very important to note, a peer review mechanism which is held \nperiodically and countries may be in the compliant list or the grey list or the black list. When \na country is in the grey list, it is a high-risk jurisdiction and will be monitored as a country \nwhich is willing to collaborate. It may also be in the black list, as my colleagues explained \nbefore, how Mauritius with the incompetence of the previous regime, fell in the grey list and \nnow we have to be careful.  \nI also understand that there are certain birds of bad omen who are voracious to go \nback in the grey list but I am sure that with this piece of consolidated legislation, this will not \nhappen. Let us pray. \nSo, regarding the ESSAMLG, it is a sort of subset of the FATF. It has 21 members. \nThis is also a very important organisation comprising countries like Madagascar, Seychelles, \nNamibia, South Africa and so many other countries. So, it is important to understand that \nMauritius, even if you can be critical about this organisation, we have to comply with the \nstandards which are being set by both organisations. \nAt the same time, Madam Speaker, I fully concur with some of my colleagues and I \nhave to also say that hon. A. Duval has made a few valid points also. Passing the law is one \nthing but I think what is very important is about implementation. The population is still \nexpecting that those who have been guilty of certain shortcomings in the past, certain crimes \nin the past – who managed the case of Sobrinho, who managed the case of Bastos?  These \nmanagement companies are still scot-free and we will have to take concrete actions against \nthese companies. This is very important.  \nAt the same time, I noticed that there has been consultation before stabilising the text \nbut at the same time, my recommendation for next time, not only for this Bill from this \nMinistry but also from other ministries, I think it is very important to have a window on the \nwebsite of all ministries to allow professionals, researchers, academics and also the brains \nfrom the diaspora to bring their criticisms and suggestions. So, we can improve; it is good but \nit could have been better, in terms of consultations.   \nAlso, I want to shed some light in terms of comparative perspectives. You will see \nthat to a great extent, those who have prepared the Bill, the technicians, they have borrowed \nthe best from different models. From the UK model, as you know, it is a very good model but \none of the golden standard models is the Hong Kong model. Even before, in 2002, we did \nfollow many of the standards from Hong Kong and this time also, there has been a sort of \nattempt to align our law, our amendments with what is being done in Hong Kong. And also, I \nthink to certain extent, I don’t know how far, those who prepared the Bill, have followed the \nScandinavian standards.  \nSo, it is important, Madam Speaker, I will just take a few examples… \nMadam Speaker: You have got two minutes left.  \nMr Narsinghen: Two minutes. \nSo, to see for example from a technical angle, how the amendments of the Bank of \nMauritius Act and the Banking Act shift the regulatory focus from a reactive watchdog \napproach to a proactive hunter model. And I think my colleague mentioned about hunter, so \nthis is a hunter model which has been adopted.  \nAlso, the Bank of Mauritius, the bank is not empowered to disclose information to \nlaw enforcement agencies, if necessary, to report suspected offence. Furthermore, it can \nimpose administrative penalties and sanctions on financial institutions and their directors for \nnon-compliance with banking laws and guidelines.  Similarly, the Banking Act, through \nsection 53(a), 64, 64(a), 64(b) and 64 (c) have been amended and this time, the scope of \nsupervision has been widened beyond money-laundering to also englobe proliferation \nfinancing. This alignment with FATF standards ensures that the financial system is also \nshielded against funding of weapons of mass destruction.  \nTo conclude, I would say that this incremental approach adopted by the Minister of \nFinancial Services, is a starting point but personally, I am still waiting for more amendments. \nFor example, the hon. Prime Minister and the hon. Attorney General mentioned that we are \nsoon coming with a National Crime Office, Fraud Office and this is important. As I \nmentioned, having the laws and the books is very good but implementation and also placing \nthe right persons in the right places is of paramount importance.  \nSo, thank you for your attention, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much. \nYes, hon. Ameer Meea.  \n(7.13 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Industry, SMEs and Cooperatives (Mr A. Ameer Meea): Thank \nyou, Madam Speaker.  \nAllow me at the outset to commend my colleague, Dr. the hon. Mrs Jyoti Jeetun, \nMinister of Financial Services and Economic Planning, for introducing this important piece \nof legislation to the House. I wish to place on record my sincere appreciation to her Ministry, \nto the Attorney-General’s Office, to the Core Group, to the inter-ministerial committee, to the \nmonitoring teams, to the competent authorities and to all the Ministers and institutions that \nare working relentlessly on this national priority. This is technical, demanding and often \ninvisible work but it is absolutely vital for Mauritius. \nI also wish to salute the leadership of the hon. Prime Minister. The Prime Minister has \nbeen clear from the outset that the integrity of our financial system and the credibility of \nMauritius as a jurisdiction, are non-negotiable.  \nFinancial services have transformed Mauritius from a low-income agriculture-based \neconomy into an upper middle income financial hub. Mauritius is not just a small island \neconomy. We are recognised as an International Financial Centre, a gateway connecting \ncapital to Africa and beyond. Our jurisdiction plays a critical role in facilitating investment \nflows and supporting economic development across the region. We are a bridge between \nAfrica, Asia, Europe, the United States and the Gulf. We are a platform of trust, expertise and \nconnectivity. That is the position we have built over the years, and that is the position we \nmust now defend with even greater seriousness. A strong AML/CFT framework is not a \nburden on our International Financial Centre. It is the very foundation of it.  \nNo serious international financial centre in the world has been built on weak \ncompliance. It is precisely because of jurisdictions like Singapore, Luxembourg and Dublin \ntake these matters seriously that they are trusted globally. Let me be clear – being compliant \ndoes not mean being hostile to business. On the contrary, a jurisdiction that meets \ninternational standards is a jurisdiction where serious investors want to be. Compliance opens \ndoors. It does not close them. \nThe message we send to the world is that Mauritius welcomes legitimate investment \nand will protect it within a framework that is transparent, robust and internationally \nrespected. The consequences of falling short of AML/CFT standards are severe, to say the \nleast. We cannot afford at any cost to be non-compliant. Remaining on the FATF white list is \nnot a formality. It determines how the world sees us. It determines whether global investors \nview Mauritius as a safe, compliant and reliable jurisdiction. \nMadam Speaker, Mauritius has already paid the price of weakness, delay, complacency \nin this area. We were placed on the FATF Grey List. That was not minor embarrassment. It \nwas a serious warning to the country. It damaged confidence. It increased scrutiny. It imposed \ncosts on our institutions and our businesses. It affected the standing of Mauritius \ninternationally. \nWe know what it means when correspondent bank relationships become fragile and \nevery transaction involving Mauritius is looked at with suspicion. We know what it means \nwhen legitimate businesses bear the cost of past shortcomings. This is precisely why this \ngovernment is determined to ensure that Mauritius meets every international standard and \ndemonstrate effectiveness across every immediate outcome.  \nLet us be clear about how we got there. The previous government had years to act. It \nhad the warnings. It had the recommendations. It had the institutional machinery. Yet, it did \nnot act. The grey listing was the direct consequence of neglect, delayed reforms and a failure \nto take this file seriously when it mattered most. Even after Mauritius came out of the grey \nlist, they treated the exit as an end in itself. \nThey did not entrench the culture of readiness. They did not institutionalise the reforms. \nThat was a grave failure of stewardship. This government has a different path. We are not \nwaiting for the next crisis. We are strengthening the law, tightening supervision, improving \ncoordination and doing the work that should have been done earlier.  \nThe threats we seek to address are real – corruption, fraud, drug trafficking, illicit \nfinancial flows, illegal betting and bookmaking, amongst others. They are present within our \ncommunities. They distort the economy. They pollute legitimate businesses. They attack the \nvery integrity of the State. \nMadam Speaker, this fight cannot be left to one Ministry. It cannot be left to one \nregulator. It cannot be left to one committee. This is the battle of the whole country. It \nconcerns the public sector. It concerns the private sector. It concerns our regulators, our \nbanks, our designated non-financial businesses and professions, our cooperative institutions, \nand the public at large. If Mauritius is to remain trusted, then every link in the chain must \nhalt. \nMadam Speaker, let me now highlight some key amendments that this Bill introduces \nbecause they illustrate the death of this reform. The Bill amends no fewer than 23 \nenactments. It is not a narrow or sectoral exercise. It is a comprehensive overhaul of the legal \narchitecture underpinning our AML/CFT/CPF framework.  \nUnder the Bank of Mauritius Act, the Bill strengthens fit and proper person \nrequirements and enhances supervisory powers. Under the Companies Act, it tightens the \nframework for maintaining accurate and up-to-date beneficial ownership information for \ncompanies and partnership. \nUnder the Financial Crimes Commission, it reinforces investigation and enforcement \ncapacity. Under the Financial Intelligence and Anti-Money Laundering Act, it provides for \nthe temporary suspension of suspicious transactions by the FIU giving the unit a critical tool \nto prevent the dissipation of illicit funds while investigations are pursued. \nThe Bill establishes a centralised information management system for AML/CFT/CPF \nconsolidation data across competent authorities and enabling more effective coordination. It \ncreates a register of trust at the Financial Services Commission, addressing a key gap in the \nbeneficial ownership framework. It strengthens the framework for target financial sanctions \nand asset recovery. It introduces the offence of ecocide; it requires that payments for the \npurchase of motor vehicles above a prescribed threshold be effected by cheque or bank \ntransfer not by cash, closing a known channel for the laundering of proceeds of crime. \nThe Bill also enhances AML/CFT obligations in the insurance sector, tightens \nsupervisory requirements under the Gambling Regulatory Authority Act, strengthens the \nidentification of controllers of associations and improves the transparency of trust \narrangement under the Trust Act.  \nMadam Speaker, I now turn to matters that specifically concern my Ministry. The Bill \nis also highly targeted and practical in its approach to strengthening the cooperative sector.  \nCooperatives occupy a unique place in the socio-economic fabric of Mauritius. \nCooperative credit unions are member owned, democratically governed institutions operating \non the principle of one member, one vote. They play a crucial role in fostering a savings \nculture and making credit accessible to their members.  \nThey are community based, industry based and they operate in Rodrigues as well. \nPrecisely because cooperatives are close to the people, they must also be protected from \nabuse. Smaller cooperatives sometimes face challenges in the fully understanding their \nobligations under technical framework such as AML/CFT/CPF. \nThis is precisely why as Minister, one of the first areas we tackled was cooperative \nsupervision. The Co-operatives Act was amended under the Finance Act 2025 conferring \nenhanced supervisory and enforcement powers upon the register of cooperative societies, \nincluding the authority to conduct onsite inspections of cooperative societies, particularly \ncredit unions to impose and enforce sanctions in case of noncompliance and to issue directive \nto cooperative credit unions to ensure adherence to the relevant AML/CFT enactments, \nincluding the Financial Intelligence and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2002, the Co-operatives \nAct 2016 as amended, and the United Nations (Financial Prohibitions, Arms Embargo and \nTravel Ban) Sanctions Act 2019. \nMadam Speaker, following these amendments extensive outreach programmes have \nbeen undertaken. Five workshops were held between August 2025 and February 2026 with \ncooperative credit unions and officers of my Ministry covering the FATF recommendations, \nthe National Risk Assessment, the Mutal Evaluation Process, customer due diligence, \nsuspicious transaction reporting, sanctions screening and vulnerabilities faced by the sector.  \nCooperative unions are classified as reporting persons under FIAMLA and are required \nto register on GoAML platform. A dedicated training session was held on 24 February 2026 \nand directives were issued by the Registrar to require mandatory registration. Out of 148 \ncooperative credit unions, 100 have already registered. The remaining 48 are expected to \nregister by end of April this year. \nThis is what seriousness looks like. This is what it means to move from policy to \nresults. The cooperative supervisory framework is no longer theoretical. It is up and running. \nLet me underline this point. In the space of a few months, the Cooperatives Division of my \nMinistry has moved from a position where the cooperative sector had limited AML/CFT \nawareness to a position where structured workshops have been delivered, a legal framework \nfor beneficial ownership has been defined, directives have been issued, and two-thirds of all \ncooperative credit unions are now registered on the GoAML platform. This did not happen by \naccident. It happened because we treated this as a priority from day one. It happened because \nwe understood that the credibility of Mauritius depends on every sector being brought into \nthe fold, and not only the large financial institutions. \nDuring the workshops, concern was raised by cooperative credit unions that, in line \nwith Recommendation 24 of the FATF, there is an obligation to identify beneficial ownership \nin the cooperative sector to ensure transparency in the control structure, yet this had not been \ndefined in the Co-operatives Act 2016. Advice was sought from the Attorney-General’s \nOffice. The Attorney-General’s Office advised that beneficial ownership should be defined as \nthe Board of a cooperative society that is responsible for, and exercises ultimate control over, \nthe cooperative society. Directives dated 25 February 2026 were issued to all cooperative \ncredit unions, accordingly. This proposed Bill now aims at providing a legal definition of \nbeneficial ownership in the statute itself. \nThe Bill introduces the requirement to maintain a register of beneficial owners through \na new section 25A, requiring every society to keep accurate and up-to-date information on its \nbeneficial owners. The register shall be open for inspection by the supervising officer, \nmembers, the Registrar, the Principal Co-operative Auditor, auditors and competent \nauthorities and a fine of not exceeding Rs100,000 is provided for non-compliance. \nMadam Speaker, I now turn briefly to the jewellery sector, which also falls under the \nresponsibility of my Ministry through the Assay Office. The FATF has identified the \njewellery sector, which forms part of the Designated Non-Financial Businesses and \nProfessions, as one potential sector in which money is laundered. This is not theoretical. In \nrecent years, we have all witnessed an increasing number of money laundering cases in which \nthe jewellery sector has been used to launder the proceeds of crime. At this very moment, as I \naddress this August Assembly, the Assay Office is involved in testing jewellery and precious \nand semi-precious stones retained by the Financial Crimes Commission for a current case of \nsuspected money laundering. That is how close and how real this work is. \nThe Assay Office assists the FCC, the Police, the MRA and the Judiciary in \ndetermining the fineness of jewellery and the carat of precious and semi-precious stones for \ninvestigation and prosecution purposes, and participates in the National Risk Assessment. \nMadam Speaker, since 2020, under Act No. 5 of 2020, the definitions under the \nJewellery Act were amended to include precious metals and precious stones. In compliance \nwith FATF Recommendation No. 28, a fit and proper person test is now conducted on every \napplicant, examining financial soundness, competence, honesty, reputation and integrity. \nDealers are also required to report suspicious transactions above the threshold of Rs500,000. \nMy Ministry is also working on the setting up of the AML unit at the Assay Office. \nSection 166 of the Financial Crimes Commission Act 2023 will be proclaimed shortly, \nwhereby the Assay Office will become the regulatory body for Dealers in Precious Metals \nand Stones instead of the FIU, allowing the FIU to focus on its core intelligence and \ndissemination functions. This is a necessary step to build stronger and more specialised \nsupervisory capacity in this sector. We want the Assay Office to be properly equipped, \nproperly structured and properly prepared for the responsibilities that lie ahead. \nThe principle is simple. Effectiveness first, optics second. A lot has already been done to \nmake the jewellery sector more transparent and more accountable. My Ministry is pursuing \nevery available avenue to address this matter. The direction we have set is clear: the Assay \nOffice will be transformed from a purely technical body into a credible sector-specific \nsupervisory with a fully operational AML unit – proper training, proper procedures and proper \nsystems. This is what the FATF expects, and this is what Mauritius will deliver. \nMadam Speaker, the 2027 Mutual Evaluation team has already been constituted. The \npreparatory work is underway. The independent mock evaluation conducted in late 2025 \nidentified areas where Mauritius needs to demonstrate greater effectiveness, and those \nfindings are now being acted upon. But success in the upcoming evaluation will not belong to \none Ministry alone. It will belong to Mauritius. It will belong to every institution that played \nits part, every officer who did the work, and every stakeholder who understood that a clean \njurisdiction is in the national interest. \n Madam Speaker, I wish to assure this House and the international community that \nMauritius is fully committed to meeting the requirements of the FATF standards and \ndemonstrating effectiveness across its AML/CFT/CPF framework ahead of the 2027 Mutual \nEvaluation. We are not approaching this evaluation with apprehension. We are approaching it \nwith determination and with the confidence that comes from sustained institutional effort. \nMadam Speaker, to conclude, Mauritius must never be perceived as a jurisdiction \nwhere illicit funds can circulate unchecked. This Bill reinforces transparency through \nbeneficial ownership, accountability across all sectors, enforcement through stronger \ncompliance mechanisms, the protection of our economic model, and the assurance that \nMauritius remains a trusted International Financial Centre. \nMauritian has learnt from the failures of the past. This Government will not be \ncomplacent. We are building permanence, not patchwork. Mauritius chooses seriousness over \nnegligence, discipline over drift, and trust over reputational risk. The world is watching. The \nstandards are rising. And the margin for error is shrinking. We owe it to our economy. We \nowe it to our institutions. We owe it to our international partners. But above all, we owe it to \nMauritius. \nI thank you for your attention. \nMr Subron: Madam Speaker, I move that the debate be now adjourned. \nMr Mohamed rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nDebate adjourned accordingly. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Prime Minister, adjournment of the House. \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Tuesday 14 April 2026 at 11.30 a.m. \nMr Mohamed seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned! \nAt 7.35 p.m. the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 14 April 2026 at \n11.30 a.m. \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nPOLICE STATIONS – RELOCATIONS & CONSTRUCTION – PROPOSED \nLOCATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/279",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 279,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/279) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port-Louis Maritime & Port-Louis \nEast) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to State \nSecondary Schools, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number \nthereof with a student population of less than 150 as at date, indicating, in each case, the \nnumber of teaching and non-teaching staff attached thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPESTICIDES REGULATORY OFFICE – STAFF REDUCTION – REASON",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/280",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 280,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floréal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/280) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the \nMinister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to \nthe Pesticides Regulatory Office, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, \ninformation as to the reasons for the reduction in the number of officers posted thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \n \n8000 HOUSING UNITS – CONTRACT VALUE – ARSENAL PROJECT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/281",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 281,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/281) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port Louis Maritime & Port Louis \nEast) asked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the 8,000 housing units \nproject being implemented by the New Social Living Development Ltd., he will, for the \nbenefit of the House – \n(a) \nobtain information as to the – \n(i) \ncontract values thereof, indicating the initial estimated and revised costs, \ngiving details thereof; \n(ii) \ntotal mobilisation advances disbursed, and \n(iii) \ncost overruns, variations or contract amendments approved, if any, and, \nif so, give details thereof, and \n(b) \nwhether a quality assessment of the Arsenal Project has been carried out and, if \nso, table the findings thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUAN ARTISTS – CULTURAL COOPERATION MoU – EQUITABLE \nOPPORTUNITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/282",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 282,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/282) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nArts and Culture whether, in regard to the proposed signing of a Memorandum of \nUnderstanding on Cultural Cooperation with the Rodrigues Regional Assembly for the period \n2026–2029, he will state – \n(a) \nthe reasons therefor, and \n(b) \nhow the implementation thereof is expected to ensure equitable opportunities \nfor Rodriguan artists and practitioners in respect of exchanges, training and \nheritage promotion at local, regional and international levels.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMS – MAURITIAN CANDIDATES – \nPERFORMANCE – REMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/283",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 283,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/283) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the \nperformance of Mauritian candidates in the last Cambridge International Examinations, he \nwill state the – \n(a) \nremedial measures being taken to address same, and \n(b) \nresponsibility of the different authorities, particularly, the Quality Assurance \nand Inspection Division, in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBREAD PRICE – INCREASE REQUEST – CONSUMER IMPACT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/284",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 284,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "B/284\nThe Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart \n(Dr Prayag) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness – \n \nWhether, in regard to the recently launched 24/7 free hotline \n146 for the registration of patient complaints, requests and \nrecommendations relating to public health services, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the \nnumber of calls received category-wise, indicating the  \n(a) mechanism put in place to ensure timely follow-up and \nresolution thereof and the average time taken therefor and \n(b) whether a monitoring and evaluation framework has been \nset up to assess the effectiveness thereof and, if so, indicate \nthe outcome thereof?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/285",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 285,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/285) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the request made \nby the Bakers’ Association for an increase in the price of bread, he will state – \n(a) \nwhether an assessment of the impact of such an increase on consumers has been \ncarried out, and  \n(b) \nthe measures being envisaged to ensure the continuous supply of bread and \nprevent any shortage thereof on the local market.",
      "answer": "Reply: With regard to the request made by the Association des Boulangers et Pâtissiers \n(ABP) for an increase in the price of bread, I wish to inform the House that APB has \nofficially requested for an increase to Rs4.70. Government is fully conscious of the potential \nimpact that any price adjustment may have on consumers, particularly on low-and-middle-\nincome households. \nSince assuming office as Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection, I have held \nseveral meetings with the different stakeholders of the sector with a view to addressing the \nissues being faced by them. Government has consistently privileged open dialogue, and we \nare fully aware of the difficulties encountered by the baking industry, particularly in the \ncontext of increasing input costs. \nIt is also to be noted that the price of standard bread of 100g has remained unchanged \nsince 2017. In parallel, the current subsidy mechanism, which has been used to sustain this \nprice, is now operating under significant deficit pressure. In this context, there is a clear need \nto identify a long-term and sustainable solution that balances the interests of consumers, \nproducers and public finances. \nIn this respect, Government had, on 23 February 2026, set up an Inter-Ministerial \nCommittee under my chairmanship, in collaboration with the hon. Minister of Social \nIntegration, Social Security and National Solidarity, and the hon. Minister of Industry, SME \nand Cooperatives, to examine the matter in a comprehensive manner. \nThe Committee has, to date, met on three occasions and has held consultations with all \nkey stakeholders, including the Association des Boulangers et Pâtissiers, as well as consumer \nassociations such as ACIM and Consumer Eye. \nThe assessment being carried out takes into account production costs, prevailing market \nconditions and the purchasing power of the population, with a view to ensuring that any \ndecision taken is balanced, justified and in the overall interest of both consumers and the \nsustainability of the sector. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question namely measures to ensure the continuous \nsupply of bread and prevent any shortage on the local market, Government is maintaining \nclose and ongoing consultations with all stakeholders in the value chain, including bakers and \nlarge retailers involved in the production and sale of bread. \nThe situation is being closely monitored, and Government stands ready to take \nappropriate measures, where required, to safeguard both the availability and accessibility of \nbread on the local market. \nI wish to reassure the House that Government will continue to act responsibly, ensuring \nthat the interests of consumers are protected while at the same time securing the long-term \nsustainability and stability of the baking sector. \n \nMAURITIUS SPORTS COUNCIL – SPORTS INFRASTRUCTURE – RUNNING \nCOST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/286",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 286,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/286) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port Louis Maritime & Port Louis \nEast) asked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to sports infrastructure \nfalling under the purview of the Mauritius Sports Council, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the said Council, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of facilities being – \n(i) \nfully operational; \n(ii) \npartially operational, and \n(iii) \ncurrently non-operational, indicating, in respect of the latter, the reasons \ntherefor, and \n(b) \nmonthly running costs incurred in respect of each such infrastructure.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPUBLIC SECTOR – TRAINING & CAPACITY-BUILDING – BUDGET \nEARMARKED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/287",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 287,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms",
      "question": "(No. B/287) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms whether, in regard to officers in \nthe public sector, he will state the total budget earmarked for the training and capacity-\nbuilding thereof in financial year 2025-2026, indicating the number of officers who have \nbenefited therefrom since January 2026 to date.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nUNEXPLOITED AGRICULTURAL LAND – REASONS – MEASURES PROPOSED \n\n155",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/288",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 288,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/288) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to unexploited agricultural land, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to the total extent thereof country-wide, indicating the – \n(a) \nreasons therefor, and \n(b) \nmeasures being envisaged to incentivize the cultivation thereof to ensure food \nself-sufficiency and security.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMOHUNLALL MOHIT GOVERNMENT SCHOOL – ELECTRICITY SUPPLY \nISSUES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/289",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 289,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/289) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the Mohunlall \nMohit Government School, situated at L'Avenir, he will state whether the electricity supply \nissues occurring in a few classrooms thereat have been addressed and, if so, when and, if not, \nindicate the timeframe therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nLAGOONS – SWIMMING & SPEED LIMIT ZONES – REPORTED INCIDENTS – \nDEMARCATION ZONES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/290",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 290,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. B/290) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked Minister of Tourism whether, in regard to the lagoons in Mauritius, he will \nstate – \n(a) \nthe present status of the demarcation of swimming zones and speed limit zones, \nindicating the number of reported accidents or incidents having occurred thereat \nover the past six months, and \n(b) \nwhere matters stand as to the proposed maintenance, repairs and reinstatement \nof the said demarcation zones, giving details of any ongoing or planned works, \ntimelines and key milestones in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMUSICAL WORKS PRODUCTION – LOCAL ARTISTS – INCENTIVES \nPROVIDED \n\n156",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/291",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 291,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/291) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the production of \nmusical works by local artists, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nthe incentives currently available therefor, indicating the procedures applicable and the \nfinancial facilities provided thereunder.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMALDIVES-MAURITIUS – SUSPENSION OF TIES – COMMUNICATION \nCHANNELS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/292",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 292,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade",
      "question": "(No. B/292) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade \nwhether, in regard to the Maldives, he will state whether, following the recent suspension of \nour diplomatic relations therewith, an updated list of Mauritian nationals currently residing or \nemployed thereat has been drawn, indicating the communication channels and consular \nmechanisms established, if any, to provide timely guidance, assistance and protection thereto \nand whether any Mauritian national has reached out accordingly and, if so, indicate the \nmeasures taken in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nNURSING STUDIES – SCHOLARSHIPS/FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE – LOCAL \nSHORTAGES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/293",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 293,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "B/293\nThe Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis \nCentral (Dr Aumeer) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, \nBlue Economy and Fisheries – \n \nWhether, in regard to the recent outbreak of the Foot and \nMouth disease in South Africa, he will state (a) the measures \ntaken to secure alternative sources for the supply and \nimportation of cattle, including any contingency plan, put in \nplace to avert any shortage for the forthcoming Eid Ul Adha \ncelebration and (b) whether consideration will be given for \nthe imposition of strict and rigorous testing protocols on \ncattle imported from other countries?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/294",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 294,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research",
      "question": "(No. B/294) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research whether, in regard to nursing \nstudies, he will state whether consideration – \n(a) \nis being given for the provision of scholarships or other financial assistance \nschemes therefor coupled with bonds requiring beneficiaries thereof to serve in \nMauritius for specified periods, and \n(b) \nwill be given, in the longer term, for the expansion of the national nursing \ntraining capacity beyond domestic requirements once local shortages are \nadequately addressed.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nRODRIGUES – INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIONS – ALLOTED FUNDS \n\n157",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/295",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 295,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/295) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the \nMinister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the participation of athletes from \nRodrigues in international competitions, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the amount of funds \nallocated therefor since January 2025 to date, giving a breakdown thereof by \ndiscipline, and \n(b) \nstate whether consideration will be given for the setting up of a mechanism, in \ncollaboration with the National Sports Federations, to ensure that funding is made \navailable to the said athletes for their participation in national selections for \ninternational competitions.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nTOURISM ACT AMENDMENTS – PROTECTION OF MARINE MAMMALS – \nSTATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/296",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 296,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floréal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/296) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the \nMinister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the proposed introduction in the \nAssembly of amendments to the Tourism Act for the enhanced protection of marine \nmammals within our waters, he will state where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nTAMARIN PUBLIC BEACH – TOILET FACILITIES & AMENITIES – DESILTING \nWORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/297",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 297,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/297) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in \nregard to the Tamarin Public beach, he will state whether the upgrading thereof is being \nenvisaged and, if so, indicate whether consideration will be given for – \n(a)  the provision of toilet facilities and additional amenities thereat, and  \n(b)  desilting works to be carried out at the mouth of the river thereat to prevent beach \nerosion.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Beach Authority that Tamarin Beach of an extent of 2.19 \nHa with a sea frontage of approximately 410m was proclaimed as public beach through \nGeneral Notice 206 of 1940. \nAs regards part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the House that there is one toilet \nblock at Tamarin public beach which is fully operational and caters for the current demand. \nOther amenities already available on the public beach are, benches, picnic tables, lighting \npole, bins, kiosk, fire places and open shower, amongst others.  \nAll the amenities are functional, in good condition and the beach is cleaned and well \nmaintained on a daily basis by a cleaning contractor. The provision of additional amenities on \nthe beach will depend on the availability of funds.  \nAs for part (b) of the question, I am further informed by the Beach Authority that the \nriver and its outlet into the sea do not form part of the proclaimed public beach of Tamarin.  \nHowever, the House may wish to note that following the passage of Cyclone Belal, a \njoint site inspection was conducted on 23 May 2024, by the Integrated Coastal Zone \nManagement Division of my Ministry, the Beach Authority, and the Forestry Service. It was \nobserved that there was a localised coastal erosion, and immediate remedial measures, \nincluding removal of weakened trees and stumps, were then undertaken by the Forestry \nService.  \nA follow-up visit on 29 August 2024 by my Ministry confirmed that the beach had \nlargely recovered naturally, with only minor residual escarpments observed. While conditions \nare presently stable, the site remains under periodic monitoring.  \nI wish to highlight that desilting of the Tamarin river mouth falls under the purview of \nthe Ministry of Local Government and the latter has informed that desilting at the mouth of \nthe river is not technically advisable as the sea level is higher than the water level of the river \nand separated by an estuary. In the event the estuary is removed, same will be formed again \ndue to tidal action. However, desilting can be envisaged to remove any accumulated debris \nover the estuary and upstream part of the river. \nYOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT – CURRENT RATE – EMPLOYMENT \nPROGRAMMES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/298",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 298,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/298) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to youth \nunemployment, he will state – \n(a) \nthe current rate thereof gender-wise, region-wise and by educational level, and \n(b) \noutline the programmes being implemented to promote employment opportunities \nfor young graduates.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFISHERMAN REGISTRATION CARD – CERTIFICATE OF CHARACTER – \nPREREQUISITE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/299",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 299,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/299) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the Fisherman Registration Card, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to whether it is a prerequisite for the applicants for the issue thereof to hold a \nclean Certificate of Character for eligibility thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPHARMACY BOARD – MEMBERS – QUALITY CONTROL EXERCISES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/300",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 300,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/300) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port-Louis South & Port-Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Pharmacy \nBoard, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the – \n(a) \nname of the members and of the Officer-in-Charge thereof, and  \n(b) \nfrequency of the quality control exercises conducted over the drugs and health \nsupplements imported over the past three years, indicating whether adverse \nreports have been recorded in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSECONDARY SCHOOLS – SYNTHETIC DRUGS CASES – PREVENTION \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/301",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 301,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/301) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked \nthe Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the secondary schools, \nhe will state the number of reported cases of introduction, possession and consumption of \nsynthetic drugs thereat over the past ten years, indicating the measures being taken to prevent \nthe recurrence thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nVALETTA BYPASS – SPEED CAMERAS INSTALLATION – OPERATION DATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/302",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 302,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/302) Mr G. P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the projected installation of speed \ncameras along the Valetta bypass, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Traffic \nRoad Management Support Unit, information as to where matters stand, indicating the \nexpected date of coming into operation thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIAN GLOBAL BUSINESS SECTOR – TIGER GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL \nII HOLDINGS VS. THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS – IMPACT \nASSESSMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/303",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 303,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/303) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the Mauritian \nGlobal Business Sector, she will state whether her Ministry has conducted a thorough and \ndetailed assessment of the impact of the recent judgment of the Supreme Court of India in the \ncase of Tiger Global International II Holdings vs. The Authority for Advance Rulings \nthereon, particularly concerning the future eligibility of Mauritius-resident entities for capital \ngains tax exemptions under the India-Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGRAND BAY WATERFRONT MASTERPLAN – PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP \nMODEL",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-21-april-2026"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/304",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 304,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/304) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in \nregard to the Grand Bay Waterfront, he will state whether consideration is being given for the \npreparation of a Masterplan for the development thereof under a Public Private Partnership \nmodel and, if so, indicate the expected timeframe for the preparation and implementation \nthereof and, if not, the reasons therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nST. PIERRE TRAFFIC CENTRE – BUS PLATFORM REPAIR",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/305",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 305,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/305) Mr G. P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the St. Pierre Traffic \nCentre, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Development Unit, \ninformation as to where matters stand regarding the urgent repairs to be effected to the bus \nplatform thereat, indicating the – \n(a)  the nature and scope of the works to be undertaken, and  \n(b)  expected start and completion dates thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nDRAMA, MUSIC & ARTS – YOUTH PROMOTION & SUPPORT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/306",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 306,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/306) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked \nthe Minister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to drama, music and arts, he will state \nwhether consideration will be given for the setting up of appropriate infrastructure for the \npromotion thereof amongst the youth.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nNPF & NSF – FINANCIAL POSITION & INVESTMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/307",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 307,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/307) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked \nthe Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity whether, in regard \nto the National Pensions Fund and the National Solidarity Fund, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Investment Committee thereof, information as to the – \n(a) \nbalance currently standing to the credit thereof, and  \n(b) \ninvestments effected since 2015 to date, indicating the profit or loss realised \nthereon.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFESTIVAL INTERNATIONAL KREOL – CONCEPT REVIEW - TOURISTS \nATTRACTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/308",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 308,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "B/308\nThe Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière \n(Mr Quirin) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Youth and Sports – \n \nWhether, in regard to handball, he will state the measures \ntaken by his Ministry for the revamping thereof in Mauritius, \nindicating whether his Ministry proposes to help the new \nManaging Committee of the Mauritius Handball Association in \nreimbursing a debt of more than Rs 10 M following the \norganization of the Under 17 Beach Handball World \nChampionships in Mauritius in 2017?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/309",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 309,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/309) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the Festival \nInternational Kreol, he will state whether consideration will be given for a review of the \nconcept and orientation thereof with a view to enhancing its cultural heritage and content, \nincorporating symposiums and conferences, increasing local and foreign participation and \ndeveloping same into a major annual tourist attraction.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPENALTY POINT SYSTEM – IMPLEMENTATION OUTCOME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/310",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 310,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "B/310\nThe Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue (Mr Caserne) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Local Government – \n \nWhether, in regard to the abandoned and/or unutilised \nvehicles lying under the purview of the District Council of \nPamplemousses, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to the number thereof, indicating the \nmeasures being envisaged for the removal and disposal \nthereof?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/311",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 311,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/311) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Penalty Point System effective \nfrom January 31, 2026, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land \nTransport Authority, information as to the outcome of the implementation thereof as at to \ndate.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nVIEUX GRAND PORT – LA TOUR DES HOLLANDAIS – INAUGURATION & \nOPENING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/312",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 312,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/312) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the project for the inauguration \nand opening of the La Tour des Hollandais at Vieux Grand Port, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUES – FLOODING – ACCACIA DRAIN WORKS & PORT MATHURIN \nPHASE 3 DRAIN PROJECT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/313",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 313,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/313) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister \nof National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the recent torrential rain and flooding that \nseverely affected the northern region of Rodrigues Island, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Land Drainage Authority and the National Development Unit, \ninformation as to – \n(a) \nwhere matters stand as to the implementation of the Accacia drain works, and  \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given to implement, through emergency \nprocurement, the Port Mathurin phase 3 drain project.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nLPG – STOCK LEVEL, PROCUREMENT DETAILS, PRICE INCREASE & \nIMPACT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/314",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 314,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis Maritime and Port Louis East (Mr Juman)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/314) Mr E. Juman (First Member for Port Louis Maritime & Port Louis \nEast) asked the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to \nLiquefied Petroleum Gas, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information from the – \n(i) \nState Trading Company, as to the current stock level thereof, forthcoming \nconsignments thereof, indicating the expected quantities and estimated \narrival dates and details of the last procurement contract therefor, indicating \nthe name of the supplier/s, volume, agreed price and duration of the \ncontract, and  \n(ii) \nPetroleum Pricing Committee, the reasons for the recent increase in the \nprice thereof, and  \n(b) \nstate the impact of the said price increase on households and businesses, \nparticularly, small and medium enterprises.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nKOREK APPLICATION – DIGITAL DRIVING LICENCE FEATURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/315",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 315,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/315) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in \nregard to the KOREK Application, he will state where matters stand as to the coming into \noperation of the digital driving licence features thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nNOUVELLE FRANCE – WATER PUMP FAILURES – WATER SUPPLY – SHORT \n& LONG-TERM MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/316",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 316,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "B/316\nThe \nHonourable \nThird \nMember \nfor \nRodrigues  \n(Mrs Henriette-Manan) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations– \n \nWhether, in regard to Labour Officers, he will state the \nnumber of training sessions, workshops and seminars \norganised by his Ministry for the professional development \nthereof, since January 2025 to date, indicating the (a) themes \ncovered, particularly, regarding the enforcement of the \nWorkers' Rights Act and the Occupational Safety and Health \nregulations and (b) number of officers from the Rodrigues \nLabour Office invited to attend same, indicating the measures \ntaken, if any, to ensure that training is decentralised or made \naccessible via digital platforms for officers stationed in \nRodrigues?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/317",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 317,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/317) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand’ Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the water pump \nfailures at Nouvelle France over the past few months, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to the short-term and long-term \nmeasures being envisaged respectively, to restore stable and continuous water supply thereat, \ngiving details thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nLABOUR EXPLOITATION & WORKPLACE BULLYING –  SUPPORT – \nREPORTING MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/13",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 13,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "A/13\nThe Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka \n(Dr Ms Thannoo) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Education and Human \nResource – \n \nWhether, in regard to private pre-primary and primary \nschools, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to the (a) number thereof registered since the \nintroduction of the Grant-in-Aid Scheme (b) regulations \ngoverning the operation thereof and (c) qualifications of the \nteaching staff employed therein?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/14",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 14,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. A/14) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to labour \nexploitation and workplace bullying, he will state – \n(a) \nthe measures currently in place to support victims thereof, and \n(b)  whether consideration will be given for the development of a digital platform to \nfacilitate reporting and access to assistance in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Reply: Labour exploitation is not defined in our labour legislation. However, labour \nexploitation may be deemed to include forced labour, debt bondage, worst forms of child \nlabour, deception, restriction of movement, retention of identity documents, withholding of \nwages, abusive working and living conditions, intimidation and threats, and physical and \nsexual violence at work, amongst others. \nAs regards workplace bullying, same is provided for under section 114 of the Workers’ \nRights Act concerning ‘Violence at Work’. Under this section, “bullying” includes – \n“A pattern of offensive, intimidating, malicious, insulting or humiliating behaviour or \nan abuse or misuse of power or authority which attempts to undermine an individual or \ngroup of individuals, gradually eroding their confidence and capacity, which may cause \nthem to suffer stress.” \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, any worker who is a victim of labour \nexploitation or bullying can report a complaint to any of the 17 regional labour offices nearest \nto his place of work to seek redress. In case of a migrant worker, the latter can report a \ncomplaint to the Special Migrant Workers’ Unit of my Ministry. \nUpon receipt of such complaints, the officers of my Ministry investigate into the matter \nto determine whether there is sufficient substance to institute criminal proceedings against the \nperpetrator/s, after seeking advice from the Office of the Director of Public Prosecution. \nSince January 2025 to March 2026, a total of 675 cases of violence at work, involving 265 \nmale workers and 410 female workers, have been handled at the level of my Ministry, out of \nwhich, 328 have already been disposed of. \nMoreover, there are presently 19 cases of violence at work falling under section 114 of \nthe Workers’ Rights Act at the level of the Prosecution Unit of my Ministry. 16 of these cases \nhave already been lodged before the Industrial Court, and the remaining three cases are being \nfinalised by the Prosecution Unit prior to referral to court. I am also informed that since \nJanuary 2025 to March 2026, two cases of verbal abuse and one case of sexual harassment \nwere heard by the court. However, there has been no conviction as all three cases were \ndismissed. \nOther measures taken by my Ministry comprise inspections at workplaces to detect any \ncases of violence at work, including bullying, amongst others. From January 2025 to March \n2026, 1,651 inspections were carried out, covering 18,718 male workers and 12,621 female \nworkers, to look into all conditions of employment, including instances of alleged violence at \nwork. \nMoreover, as a preventive measure, my Ministry also conducts sensitisation sessions \nwith workers and employers on matters pertaining to violence at work. Since January 2025 to \nMarch 2026, 78 sensitisation sessions, covering 511 male workers and 632 female workers, \non provisions of the labour legislation, including those pertaining to violence at work, were \ncarried out by my Ministry. Additionally, 37 training sessions were conducted for the \ntechnical staff of my Ministry on provisions of the labour legislation, including those \npertaining to violence at work. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, it is worth noting that my Ministry has \ncomputerised the Labour and Industrial Relations Division through a digital system known as \nLabourConnect. The system is being tested and finetuned, and once fully operational, \nworkers will be able to report through its portal, any complaints, including those pertaining to \nviolence at work and bullying.",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/15",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 15,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "A/15\nThe Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka \n(Dr Ms Thannoo) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Housing and Lands – \n \nWhether, in regard to the proposed development of flood \nmanagement systems, he will state where matters stand, \nindicating whether (a) collaborative work has been \nundertaken with agricultural land users for the planning of \neffective drainage systems to prevent severe flooding arising \nfrom de-rocking activities in areas under cultivation  \n(b) surveys have been carried out in respect of areas affected \nby flooding on account of the recent mass concreting of \nagricultural land (c) measures have been identified for \nimplementation by real estate developers to prevent flooding \nin all areas affected by such developments and (d) the \nconservation of flood waters through the use of retention \nbasins and other similar proven measures is being promoted?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/16",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-07-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-07",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 16,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "A/16\nThe Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka \n(Dr Ms Thannoo) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, \nBlue Economy and Fisheries – \n \nWhether, in regard to sheltered farming, he will state whether \nconsideration will be given for (a) an assessment to be carried \nout of the level of treated water required therefor and for the \nidentification of key measures, in collaboration with the \nCentral Water Authority, to allow access thereto from local \nsources and (b) the promotion of open-air resilient  \nagro-ecological farming, in view of its lower water \nrequirements as compared thereto? \n \n \n \nBibi Safeena Lotun, C.S.K. (Mrs)                                          \n Clerk of the National Assembly \n \nParliament House \nPort Louis  \n \n3 April 2026",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/318",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 318,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/318) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Director of Audit Report for financial year 2024-2025, he will state whether an \nassessment of the content thereof has been carried out and, if so, indicate the – \n(a) \ncorrective measures being envisaged in relation thereto, and  \n(b) \nhow the introduction of Performance-Based Budgeting is expected to help redress \nthe situation.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, immediately, upon receipt of the Director of \nAudit Report for the financial year 2024-25, the Ministry of Finance has carried out a \ncomprehensive review of the issues raised in the report. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, the Ministry of Finance has, on 20 March 2026, \nissued a Circular to Supervising Officers and Accounting Officers urging them to take \nappropriate measures to effectively address the issues raised and implement the \nrecommendations set out in the Report and which are justified. More specifically, Ministries \nand Departments will have to take immediate and appropriate actions to – \n(a) \ndetermine the root causes of these issues; \n(b) \nexamine why they were not adequately addressed and the recommendations were \nnot implemented; \n(c) \nimplement corrective measures without delay, and \n(d) \ndesignate a responsible officer to oversee and monitor the implementation of \nthese measures. \nMadam Speaker, the Ministry of Finance has issued another Circular on 27 March 2026 \nto call upon Supervising Officers and Accounting Officers to exercise greater oversight over \nthe statutory bodies under their responsibility, with a view to addressing, again, the issues \nraised in the Director of Audit Report.  Supervising Officers should ensure that these \nstatutory bodies operate in accordance with national policies, comply with applicable \nregulatory and financial requirements, and deliver public services efficiently and effectively. \nMadam Speaker, allow me to cite one example from the 2024-2025 Report of the \nDirector of Audit with regard to the Mauritius Prison Service.  A contract for the installation \nof CCTV Cameras at the Beau Bassin Prison was awarded for an amount of Rs13.3 million. \nThis contract was awarded to Contractplus Ltd, whose CEO is one Mr Ashley Ittoo, former \nMSM Member of Parliament.  This contractor stopped responding to any request from the \nMauritius Prison Service.  As per the Audit Report, no legal advice has been sought regarding \nthis non-compliance.  This is a clear case of negligence by design.  This matter will now be \ndealt with shortly. \nGovernment will not allow such situation to persist.  This Government intends to take \ndecisive and forward-looking measures to address the shortcomings highlighted in the Audit \nReport in a durable and meaningful manner, ensuring lasting impact and tangible \nimprovements. \nMadam Speaker, we have seen, over the years, the same thing keeps happening. It \ncannot be business as usual.  Government has decided to set up a National Accountability \nEnforcement Authority (NAEA). This institution will examine findings and recommendations \narising from the reports of the entities, including Public Accounts Committee, National Audit \nOffice/Director of Audit, Audit Committee, Internal Audit and Office of Public Sector \nGovernance.  Our aim is to put in place a powerful system to reduce unjustified and \nirresponsible behaviour as well as waste of resources in the public sector. \nIt will also investigate departures from legislations, regulations, procedures and best \npractices by institutions and public officers referred by the Prime Minister’s Office. \nFollowing the tampering of the figures in the budget by the previous government, \nGovernment has requested for technical assistance from the IMF for preparing and \nimplementing the Fiscal Responsibility Act. The National Accountability Enforcement \nAuthority will be given the mandate to ensure compliance with the forthcoming Fiscal \nResponsibility Act, including an assessment of the macroeconomic assumptions. \nRelevant legislations will, therefore, be amended so that following the submission of \nthe report of the National Audit Office, the Director of Audit submits an additional report \nfocusing on the most important findings and recommendations. This will make it easier to \nimpose sanctions where necessary.  Abusive practices and waste of public resources should \nnot become recurrent and chronic. \nIn addition, copies of all qualified audit reports of government owed companies and \nstatutory bodies will be submitted to the National Accountability Enforcement Authority for \ninvestigation and remedial actions. \nThe National Accountability Enforcement Authority will be headed by a Director \nGeneral and it will be conferred sufficient powers to convene Heads of Public Institutions, \nobtain relevant information in view of investigation and application of administrative \nsanctions. \nFurthermore, as announced in the Government Programme 2025-2029, to foster greater \ntransparency and accountability, the mandate of the Public Accounts Committee will be \nbroadened. I will come up with proposals for consideration by the House. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, the introduction of Performance-Based \nBudgeting has provided Government with a powerful tool to improve efficiency and \neffectiveness in the use of public funds. The PBB sets out Key Performance Indicators, which \nministries and departments have to achieve.  This is compelling ministries and departments to \nreview their processes, eliminate wasteful and sub-optimal practices, and improve service \ndelivery. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. A. Duval! \nMr A. Duval: May I ask the hon. Prime Minister with regard to the Public Accounts \nCommittee, which he referred to, may I know when does Government envisage to amend the \nStanding Orders to allow the report of the Public Accounts Committee to be scrutinised by \nthe House in debates, as was promised? \nThe Prime Minister: This should have been done even before. \nMr A. Duval: Yes, but… \nThe Prime Minister: I do not know why it was not done. I mentioned that in my \nanswer that we are going to set up a National Accountability Enforcement Authority, which \nwill also link with the Public Accounts Committee. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, alright. Hon. Rookny! \nMr Rookny: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Prime Minister please advise \nthe House on how would change be brought about if the same senior public officials are \nmaintained in office or are merely shifted in-between ministries, whereby each one covers \ntheir friends? Thank you. \nThe Prime Minister: Unless we sack them, we cannot do otherwise. They are here. \nAn hon. Member: They are here to stay! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, may I? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, it must be related to the question. \nMr A. Duval: Yes. In fact, I am going back to the question I asked. My question was \nwith regard to the amendment of Standing Orders to allow for the debate. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nMr A. Duval: He answered about something else. May I ask again? \nMadam Speaker: No, we got the answer that it is coming! \nMr A. Duval: No, he did not say that. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Hon. Prime Minister! \nThe Prime Minister: Yes… \nMadam Speaker: Yes, I heard. We will go through the Standing Orders Committee. \nYes, hon. Ms J. Bérenger! \nNATIONAL ASSEMBLY – KREOL MORISIEN – PROPOSED INTRODUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/319",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 319,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floréal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/319) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the proposed \nintroduction of Kreol Morisien in the National Assembly, he will state where matters stand.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Thank you, Madam Speaker. As the House is aware, section 49 \nof the Constitution provides that the official language of the Assembly shall be in English, but \nany Member may address the Chair in French. \nStanding Order 5 of the Standing Orders and Rules of the National Assembly provides \nthat the proceedings and debates of the Assembly shall be in the English Language, but a \nMember may address the Assembly in French. \nMadam Speaker, the introduction of Kreol Morisien in the National Assembly has been \nthe subject of several Parliamentary Questions in the past.   \nFurthermore, in the context of International Day of the mother tongue, Madam Speaker, \nyou, yourself announced that you would hold consultative meetings with a view to looking \ninto the practical hurdles that needed to be cleared before introducing the use of Kreol \nMorisien into the National Assembly. \nI wish to inform the House that following the consultative meetings, a document has \nbeen submitted to me on 12 March 2026. The report proposes a structured road map. Then, \nnow we will have to proceed in the following manner. The report, first of all, will have to be \nsubmitted to Cabinet. It has not been submitted to Cabinet yet. I will then propose a Motion \nin the National Assembly for the setting up of a Select Committee that would now be tasked \nto submit a report to the House within a period of three months so that there is no loss of \ntime. \nThe practical hurdles you mentioned in the report of the Steering Committee, they \nconcern legal procedures, procedural, technical and institutional conditions which are \nnecessary before we introduce Kreol Morisien in Parliament. \nThe Terms of Reference of the Select Committee would be guided by the key actions \ncontained in the report submitted by you, Madam Speaker, on the proposed introduction of \nKreol Morisien in the National Assembly. \n“Consultations between the National Assembly and the Attorney General’s Office for \nthe drafting and – \n(a) \nIntroduction in the National Assembly of – \n(i) \na proposed amendment to section 49 of the Constitution for the introduction \nof Kreol Morisien in the National Assembly; and \n(ii) \na motion, requiring notice, for the amendment of Standing Order 5 of the \nStanding Orders and Rules of the National Assembly, to be accompanied by \na draft of the proposed amendment; (…) shall then be referred to the \nStanding Orders Committee which shall submit, after deliberations, a report \nthereon, which shall be debated, following a motion moved accordingly and \nif and when approved, Standing Order 5 shall then stand amended \naccordingly; and \n(b) \npursuant to Standing Order 77, prescription by Madam Speaker of the Interim \nRules Governing the use of Kreol Morisien in the National Assembly during the \nPilot Phase, to include the – \n• scope and limitations of the use of Kreol Morisien in the proceedings of \nthe National Assembly and of Committees; \n• rules on language decorum, and \n• use of the English language as the language for administrative, judicial \nand constitutional purposes.” \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \nMs J. Bérenger: Merci. À la lumière de sa réponse, l’honorable Premier ministre peut-\nil nous dire si son gouvernement soutient toujours sur le principe l’utilisation de notre langue \nnationale comme langue d’expression parlementaire ? \nThe Prime Minister: Oui, définitivement. This is one of the things, that… I must say, \nMadam Speaker, in all fairness, I was not too sure that that was a good idea at the beginning \nbut the late Dev Virahsawmy convinced me why it was necessary. I must say that in all \nfairness.  \nSo, then we started, I spoke to Dr. Arnaud Carpooran and then I launched his Kreol \nMorisien Dictionary, I think it was, at the University of Mauritius in September 2011. Then, \nthe Mauritius Institute of Education has a department now dedicated in the pedagogy and \ncurriculum of the Kreol Morisien.  \nIn 2011, the State of Mauritius recognised an orthography for Kreol Morisien and in \n2012, it was introduced in primary schools as an optional subject. Later on, it was introduced \nat the secondary level as well and the first exam for Kreol Morisien has been set at the School \nCertificate Level, and also the anthology for Kreol Morisien has been published in February \n2026 just to show that we are determined that this should be the case now. This is why I put a \nlimit of three months so that we can get on with it. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. Yes! \nMs J. Bérenger: L’honorable Premier ministre peut-il déposer le rapport soumis par la \nSpeaker sur la Table de l’Assemblée ? \nThe Prime Minister: I intend to, but first I will circulate it to Cabinet. I think for the \nmoment, just myself and the former Deputy Prime Minister have it. We will have to circulate \nto others, and then, we will submit it to the National Assembly. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMs J. Bérenger: Et dans ce cas, l’honorable Premier ministre a mentionné certains \nhurdles, mais ça reste très générale. Il a mentionné des legal procedures, peut-il dans ce cas \npréciser spécifiquement quelles conditions doivent encore être réunies avant que la réforme \npuisse être amenée et que les amendements au Standing Orders et à la Constitution puissent \nêtre présentés ? Quels sont spécifiquement ces hurdles ? \nThe Prime Minister: I do not think they are unsurmountable hurdles that will delay. \nThat is why I put a time limit of three months. But in the report, Madam Speaker, you \nmentioned these practical hurdles, which you said concern legal procedures and then \ntechnical and institutional conditions, which will be necessary. I don’t think these are hurdles \nthat are going to take us time. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMs J. Bérenger: Merci! On a eu le calendrier de trois mois pour être présenté au \nconseil des ministres mais peut-on avoir… \nMadam Speaker: Non ! Non ! Non ! \nMs J. Bérenger: … pour que le Select Committee présente son rapport au conseil des \nministres ? Peut-on savoir dans la réalité, concrètement, quand est-ce que les amendements \npourront être présentés à l’Assemblée pour la réforme de la Constitution et les Standing \nOrders ? \nThe Prime Minister: Three months will take us just after the budget. So, after that, as \nsoon as it is practical, but there won’t be delay. That is why I put three months there. In your \nreport, you suggested even up to six months, but I reduced it to three months, Madam \nSpeaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, I won’t make any comments.  \nAlright, next question! \nPITON – MR C. V. – ASSAULT CASE – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/320",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 320,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/320) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the case \nof assault on one Mr C. V. on, 05 April 2026, at Piton, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to where matters stand regarding the \ninquiry initiated thereinto, indicating whether arrests have been effected in connection \ntherewith and charges lodged.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat on 05 April 2026 at 22.15 hours, one Mr J. L. of NHDC Bon Espoir phoned at the Piton \nPolice Station requesting for Police assistance. The two Police Officers immediately \nproceeded to the scene of the incident. Upon reaching there, they gathered preliminary \ninformation that one Mr C.V. had been assaulted and the latter, who had been stabbed and \nbleeding profusely, had already been conveyed to SSRN Hospital by volunteers. \nThe Police Officers then proceeded to SSRN Hospital to enquire about the victim, and \ngathered further information thereat from Mr V.R. \nLater that night, at Piton Police Station, the Police recorded the declaration of Mr V.R. \nto the effect that he has witnessed a case of assault by Mr J.A.K.B. on Mr C.V. at NHDC Bon \nEspoir, Piton. On same night, the police examined the spot of the incident to secure evidence \nand search the weapon that was used to assault the victim. The Police also initiated and \nmaintained mobile patrol in the surrounding on 05 and 06 April 2026 to look out for the \naccused. \nOn 06 April 2026 at 11.15 hours, the Piton Police Officers recorded the statement of the \nvictim, Mr C.V. at SSRN Hospital and issued a PF 58. The victim stated again the same thing \nthat Mr J.A.K.B. had assaulted him and stolen his money. \nOn 08 April 2026, Mr J.A.K.B., was arrested and his statement was recorded. He was \nprovisionally charged for the offence of “Larceny with wounding” before the Rivière du \nRempart District Court. The Court granted him bail after the latter furnishing a surety of \nRs1,000 and Rs1,150 as costs and entering into a recognizance of Rs10,000 with the \ncondition to report daily at the Piton Police Station between 06.00 hours in the morning to \n18.00 hours. His next Court appearance is scheduled for 24 June 2026.  \nThe Police is still in the process of recording statements from other witnesses. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, you want to question? \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, hon. prime Minister. Would the hon. Prime Minister indicate \nwhether, in determining the conditions of the bail in this case, due consideration has been \ngiven to all relevant medical and evidential elements, including those arising from the \nvictim’s hospitalisation having regard to the seriousness of the case and positive or negative \nsubstance abuse test done on the victim during hospitalisation? \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, this is the prerogative of the court. They decide \non what conditions to put in all this. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, you are alright? Yes hon. Ms J. Bérenger! \nBASIC RETIREMENT PENSION – ELIGIBILITY AGE INCREASE – IMPACT \nASSESSMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/321",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 321,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floréal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/321) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the increase in the \neligibility age to benefit from the Basic Retirement Pension, he will state whether, in the \ncontext of the preparation of the forthcoming Budget, his Ministry has carried out any study \nor socio-economic impact assessment of the effects thereof on vulnerable groups, including \nlow-income earners and, if so, indicate the main findings and conclusions thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, as the hon. Member is aware and is indeed the \nwhole population, the previous Government left us with a disastrous fiscal position. Public \nfinances were in a mess and they had left the country with a public debt of nearly 90% of \nGDP and a budget deficit of 9.3% of GDP. The economy had thus been irresponsibly \nmanaged over the past decade. Both the IMF and the World Bank had sounded the alarm on \nthe imperative of reforming our pension system years back. In its report in 2015 entitled \n“Pension Reforms in Mauritius: Fair and Fast – Balancing Social Protection and Fiscal \nSustainability”, the IMF stated that the reform of our pension system was now necessary and \nunavoidable. \nMoody’s was on the verge of downgrading Mauritius to junk status. As Minister \nresponsible for finance, I promptly took decisive measures in my very first budget to address \nand correct the situation. \nWe are, Madam Speaker, among the very few countries in the world, if not, probably \nthe only one where the eligibility age for the BRP – which I want to emphasise – is a non-\ncontributory pension, is lower than the normal retirement age. I do not think in any other \ncountry this happens; it has been 65 years since 2018. Furthermore, the cost of the BRP had \nbecome increasingly unsustainable, the words that are used in various reports. It had \nincreased from 1.9% of GDP in 2010 to 7.8% of GDP in 2024-2025. Similarly, the percentage \nof BRP expenditure in Government recurrent expenditure increased from 9.6% in 2010 to \n14.2 % in 2015-2016, and further to 24.5% in 2024-2025.   \nThese figures clearly illustrate the growing fiscal pressure on public finances. Without \nreforms, expenditure on the BRP would have been unsustainable. The situation is such that, \nwithout reform, we risk a future where there will be no pension for any person who is retiring \nneither today nor tomorrow. \nIn addition, this significantly constrains our fiscal space thereby limiting our ability to \nallocate adequate resources in health, education and housing which are vital for our long term \nsocial and economic development.  \nGovernment, therefore, took a decisive action to address the issue in order to ensure a \nstrong and reliable pension system for generations to come. \nMadam Speaker, if no action would have been taken by this Government, it would have \nbecome impossible to sustain our welfare state as the cost of BRP would have reached Rs100 \nbillion in 2035. The actual figure for BRP was Rs55.3 billion for Financial Year 2024-2025, \nthat is, if you look at it, more than the budgets for – \n(a) \nHealth, which is Rs17.2 billion;  \n(b) \nEducation, which is Rs19.4 billion;  \n(c) \nHousing, which is Rs2.2 billion, and also  \n(d) \nPolice Services, which are Rs12.6 billion.  \nI think these figures speak for themselves. \nAccordingly, we have decided to gradually increase the eligibility age for BRP from 60 \nto 65. I want to point out that it is a gradual increase and those who have turned 60 before the \nbudget, they are still getting their pension at the age of 60. That is over a period, we started \nthis gradual process from 01 September 2025.  \nI wish to remind the House that with a view to avoiding sudden hardship for our elderly \nwho are impacted by the reform and protecting the vulnerable groups, including low-income \nearners, Government set up two Inter-Ministerial Committees to look into the matter. In the \ninterest of time and expediency, the Committees were subsequently merged. The Committee \nhad studied and assessed the impact of the pension reform with a view to come up with \nvarious options and possibilities to support those affected by the reform, particularly the poor \nand the vulnerable groups. On this basis, two main measures were proposed by the \nCommittee.  \nThe first measure was the implementation of an Income Support, through the MRA, to \nall those who are no longer eligible for BRP, provided that – \n(a) \nfor a single individual, his or her monthly income does not exceed Rs10,000, and \n(b) \nfor a couple, the monthly household income does not exceed Rs20,000. \nThis support aims at covering a range of beneficiaries including housewives, retirees, \nemployees and self-employed persons who rely mainly on the BRP instead of focusing only \non persons in sectors with difficult conditions. We looked at that but we decided to do it that \nway. \nThe monthly Income Support was set on Rs10,000 in September 2025, it has now been \nincreased to Rs10,370 in January 2026, that is, full compensation was given to the loss in \npurchasing power due to inflation. \nThe second measure provides for the beneficiaries of Basic Invalidity Pension, the \nBasic Widow’s Pension and the Invalidity Allowance, who turn 60 years of age, to continue \nto receive their respective pensions until they qualify for the BRP. \nMadam Speaker, as the House is aware, Government has also set up a Commission of \nExperts on Pension Reform in September of last year. They were to look at the pension \nsystem globally and make recommendations to reform the three pillars of our pension system, \nincluding the pillar one, that is, the Basic Retirement Pension. \nAs regards the next Budget, the hon. Member will understand that I cannot reveal the \npolicy measures now, but I will be announcing them in the budget. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, one question. \nMs J. Bérenger: Je vous remercie. Je ne demandais pas les policy measures qui serons \nprises dans le prochain budget. Ma question concernait précisément si une étude de l’impact \nsocio-économique de la réforme a été faite avant le budget qui arrive. \nThe Prime Minister: Yes. We did – I cannot say it was a thorough study because there \nwas a question of time but we are still going on doing this to check what in fact will be the \nimpact. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Deuxième. \nMs J. Bérenger: Who is checking this impact? The committee? \nThe Prime Minister: This is done by the Ministry of Finance and also in conjunction \nwith the Ministry of Social Security. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Next question, hon. Dr. Aumeer! \nSEAPORTS & AIRPORTS – BORDER CONTROL – DRUG SEIZURES – OFFICERS \nPOSTING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/322",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 322,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/322) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to border control at the seaports and airports respectively, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to – \n(a) \nover the past three years, the number of – \n(i) \ndrug seizures carried out thereat, and \n(ii) \nPolice Officers, including officers of the Anti-Drug and Smuggling Unit, \nposted thereat allegedly involved in drug trafficking and the number thereof \nconvicted therefor as at to date, and \n(b) \nwhether profiling exercises are carried out prior to the posting of enforcement \nofficers at strategic entry points thereof, indicating the measures being envisaged \nto ensure the integrity of officers posted thereat.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed by the Commissioner of Police that from 01 January 2023 to 10 April 2026, 108 \ndrug seizures were carried out at the seaport and 151 at the airport. Three Police Officers \nposted at the airport were arrested in connection with the drug cases. These Police Officers \nare currently in detention and have been interdicted pursuant to Regulation 28 of the \nDisciplined Forces Service Commission Regulations. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, prior to posting of Police Officers at strategic entry \npoints, a thorough screening and due diligence exercise is carried out on the officers. \nAfter the posting of the Police Officers, their conduct is constantly monitored by the \nOfficer-in-Charge to ascertain that they maintain the professional standards required in the \nexercise of their duties at all times. Rotation of Police Officers is carried out on a need basis \nto preserve the integrity of the different departments. Training is also dispensed to the Police \nOfficers on matters pertaining to discipline and integrity. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you. May I ask the hon. Prime Minister whether officers posted at \nsuch sensitive points at the seaport and the airport, are subjected to the declaration of assets \nas per the Declaration of Assets Act 2019 so that signs of external riches match their salary or \neven their private business? \nMadam Speaker: Good! \nThe Prime Minister: Very good suggestion, which we are looking at and probably we \nwill bring to Parliament later on. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, second question. \nDr. Aumeer: Can I ask the hon. Prime Minister if consideration can be given to the \npresence of sniffer dogs at each of our six conveyor belts that are present in the arrival halls \nrather than random sniffer dogs assessing so that a thorough control of those who can use \nother means to get drugs in the country? \nThe Prime Minister: I looked into that matter, Madam Speaker, and the police tell me \nthey do not have enough dogs, but they are looking into that problem. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Last one! \nDr. Aumeer: Does the hon. Prime Minister have any information from the Cargo \nHandling Corporation as to measures taken to have strict access to the container park and the \nfishing ports, particularly at night, keeping in mind that the port area was declared, in the \nPaul Lam Shang Leen report, as the most porous area where drugs enter the country? Thank \nyou. \nThe Prime Minister: They are supposed to do that, Madam Speaker. And I hope they \nare doing it. Unless you have the information that they are not; you can give it to me. \nMadam Speaker: We have been advised that PQ B/323 will be replied by the Minister \nof Health. \nSo, now we go to Dr. Prayag. Last question! Then, time is up. \nILLICIT DRUGS SEIZED – POLICE VEHICLE – INQUIRY & ACCOUNTABILITY \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/323",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 323,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/323) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nrecruitment of medical and health professionals in the public sector, he will state whether \nconsideration will be given for the setting up of a Medical and Health Services Commission \nalong the lines of existing service commissions, with a view to strengthening governance and \naccountability in the said sector.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nABANDONED VEHICLES – REMOVAL – COLLABORATIVE APPROACH",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/324",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 324,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/324) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the case \nof illicit drugs reportedly found in a police vehicle on 03 April 2026, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to – \n(a) \nwhere matters stand regarding the inquiry initiated thereinto, indicating the \nnumber of Police Officers interrogated, suspended or charged in connection \ntherewith, and \n(b) \nthe measures being envisaged to strengthen internal controls, monitoring and \naccountability mechanisms within the Mauritius Police Force.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat on Thursday 02 April 2026, a Supervisor at Mitsubishi Motors, Leal Company Limited, \nat Pailles, found a suspicious plastic parcel containing several aluminium foils allegedly \ncontaining dangerous drugs in a Police vehicle, which had been brought for servicing and \ntyre check at the company’s workshop. \nAs there was no immediate superior officer to report the matter, he kept the suspicious \nparcel in its original place and locked the vehicle. The next day, he informed his superiors at \nMitsubishi Motors who then reported the matter to the Police Vehicle Transport Unit, \nresponsible for the servicing and repairs of fleet of Police vehicles. \n The matter was immediately referred to the Anti-Drug and Smuggling Unit (ADSU) \nand, on the same day, a team of ADSU Metropolitan called at the location and, in presence of \nall parties concerned, secured the suspected parcel, allegedly containing drugs. The vehicle \nwas kept under lock and key at Mitsubishi Motors and the Police Sergeant from the Police \nVehicle Transport Unit and the Supervisor of Mitsubishi Motors were brought at ADSU \nOffice for enquiry.   \nThe Police vehicle was examined by officers of the Forensic Science Lab and the \nPolice photographer on 07 April 2026, as Mitsubishi Motors was closed from Saturday 04 to \nMonday 06 April 2026 for the Easter weekend.  On the same day, the exhibits were sent to \nthe Forensic Science Laboratory for examination as well as for DNA swab. \nMadam Speaker, the said vehicle is used by eight personnel of the Special Team \nMetropolitan Division (North) on a daily basis and they have been interrogated and their \nstatements have been recorded. The Police Sergeant from the Police Vehicle Transport Unit \nand three employees of Mitsubishi Motors have also been interviewed and their statements \nrecorded.   \nOn 09 April 2026, the houses of a Police Sergeant and a Police Constable of the Special \nTeam Metropolitan Division (North) were searched, but nothing incriminating was found.  \nSo far, Madam Speaker, there is no direct evidence against any of the Police Officers, \nand therefore, no arrest or suspension has been effected in connection with this case. The \nresults of the DNA tests and further investigation will determine the course of action in terms \nof arrest or suspension. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I would like to inform the House that \nCommanders and Station Managers of the Mauritius Police Force have been instructed to \nstrictly abide with existing Standing Orders to ensure an in-depth verification of all Police \nvehicles under their responsibilities and the Police Inspectorate Team to carry out surprise \nchecks of Police Stations as well as vehicles under their responsibilities. \nIn addition, the Police Vehicle Technical Unit will henceforth examine in depth all \nPolice vehicles being referred for maintenance, servicing or repairs. \nPolice is also carrying out specific training to Police Officers, focusing on \naccountability and transparency and the consequences meted out for indulging in drug related \noffences as public officers. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, just one because we are … \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. Could the hon. Prime Minister consider \nreshuffling police vehicles between stations as an urgent means to tackle this issue? \nThe Prime Minister: I can advise the Commissioner of Police of your request. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Time is up! \nI have to inform you that the following PQs have been withdrawn: B/327, B/328, \nB/329, B/332, B/333, B/334, B/335, B/336, B/338, B/339, B/340, B/342, B/343, and B/344. \nNow, we go to questions addressed to Ministers. Because of the PQ’s that have been \nwithdrawn – it is a bit of a mess – it seems to me that I have to call hon. Caserne now! \nCULTURAL DESK – IMPLEMENTATION STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/325",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 325,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/325) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the removal of abandoned vehicles lying on public roads, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain information as to whether consideration will be given for a collaborative \napproach involving the Police Vehicle and Towing Unit, the Police de l’Environnement, the \nRegular Police and the National Land Transport Authority therefor.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that the term abandoned vehicles \nmeans vehicles left by their owners on footpaths or along public roads. Such vehicles, apart \nfrom obstructing the free passage of pedestrians, are a risk to the safety of road users. \nPursuant to the Road Traffic (Removal of Vehicles) Regulations 1962, the Police are \nempowered to require the owner to remove an abandoned vehicle or to cause it to be removed \nfrom the road to a designated place. \nIn accordance with Police Administrative Order No. 6 of 2018, a coordinated and \nintegrated mechanism has been established involving the regular Police, the Police de \nl’Environnement, the Police Vehicle Towing Unit and the National Land Transport Authority \nto ensure that the removal and disposal of abandoned vehicles are carried out in a \ncoordinated, orderly and legally compliant manner. \nI wish to inform the House that since January 2025, a total of 61 abandoned vehicles on \npublic roads have been identified across the island. Of these, 37 vehicles have already been \nremoved and towed to a designated site for further action. Removal notices have been affixed \non the remaining 24 vehicles, requiring owners to remove them within the prescribed delay, \nfailing which they will be removed by the Police and towed to Fort George in accordance \nwith the Road Traffic (Removal of Vehicles) Regulations 1962. \nThis coordinated approach is being continuously implemented and reinforced with a \nview to ensuring the timely removal of abandoned vehicles lying on public roads. \nDRUG TRAFFICKING & MONEY LAUNDERING – ARRESTS & VEHICLES \nSEIZURES – NOV 2024-APR 2026",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/326",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 326,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/326) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the laundering of money suspected of being proceeds of drug trafficking, since \nNovember 2024 to date, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Financial \nCrimes Commission and the Commissioner of Police, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of suspected drug dealers arrested in relation thereto; and  \n(b) \nlist of vehicles including cars, motorbikes, quads and pleasure crafts seized in \nconnection therewith, indicating the total estimated value thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: In regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Acting Director-\nGeneral of the Financial Crimes Commission that since November 2024 to date, the \nCommission has arrested 25 persons suspected to have been involved in laundering money \nderived from proceeds of drug trafficking. \nThe Commissioner of Police has, on the other hand, informed that since November \n2024 to 08 April 2026, 232 suspected drug dealers have been arrested in 217 cases of alleged \nmoney laundering from proceeds of drug trafficking. \nIn regard to part (b) of the question, the Acting Director-General of the Financial \nCrimes Commission has informed that since November 2024, 608 vehicles have been seized \nfor an estimated value of Rs444,466,812. The vehicles consist of – \n(i) \n8 Lorries; \n(ii) \n467 Cars; \n(iii) 76 Motorcycles; \n(iv) 3 Quads; \n(v) \n5 Bobcats; \n(vi) 49 Pleasure Crafts. \nThe Commissioner of Police has, on his part, informed that 26 vehicles have been \nseized, namely 15 cars, three vans, six motorcycles, one scooter and one pleasure craft, and \nare in the process of being evaluated. \nAIR MAURITIUS LTD – STRATEGIC PARTNER – UPDATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/327",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 327,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/327) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Air Mauritius Ltd., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nwhether Airport Holdings Ltd. is seeking a strategic partner therefor and, if so, where matters \nstand, indicating the names of any shortlisted partners.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFINANCIAL CRIMES COMMISSION – 45 PRISON OFFICERS REFERRAL – \nUNEXPLAINED WEALTH",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/328",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 328,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/328) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the alleged referral of some 45 prison officers to the Financial Crimes Commission \nby the then Commissioner of Prisons, Mr D. J., for unexplained wealth and the formal denial \nthereof issued by the Commission in relation thereto, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to whether inquiries have been \ninitiated thereinto and, if so, indicate, the outcomes thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nFINANCIAL CRIMES COMMISSION – MR A.C.P ARREST – SEIZED ITEMS LIST",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/329",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 329,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/329) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the arrest \nof Mr A. C. P. by the Financial Crimes Commission on or about 03 April 2026, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain information as to the list of items seized at his residence, \nindicating whether any illicit drugs were seized and, if so, give details thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION – ANNUAL REPORT 2025 – \nRECOMMENDATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/330",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 330,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/330) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Annual Report \n2025 of the National Human Rights Commission, he will state whether he has taken \ncognizance of the recommendations contained therein and whether consideration will be \ngiven for the consolidation of the independence of the said Commission and for the alignment \nthereof with the Paris Principles as recommended therein.",
      "answer": "Reply: In accordance with section 11 of the Protection for Human Rights Act, the \nAnnual Report 2025 of the National Human Rights Commission was submitted to the \nPresident and tabled in the National Assembly on Tuesday 31 March 2026.  The Report is \nalso available online. \nThe Report comprises, inter alia, an overview of the Commission’s mandate, its \ninstitutional priorities, key achievements and challenges and reform priority areas. \nOne of the main reform priority areas of the Commission is the modernisation of the \nlegislative framework governing its mandate and powers. In its Annual Report, the \nCommission has also proposed a comprehensive review of the Protection of Human Rights \nAct to strengthen institutional independence, clarify appointment and removal safeguards and \nenhance operational coherence, in pursuit of full alignment with the Paris Principles. \nThe Paris Principles set out the minimum standards that National Human Rights \nInstitutions must meet in order to be considered credible and to operate effectively.  The key \npillars of the Paris Principles are pluralism, independence and effectiveness and some of the \nrequirements of the Paris Principles include, amongst others – \n(i) \nindependence from Government, set out in legislation or the Constitution; \n(ii) \nin order to ensure a stable mandate for the Members of the National Institution, \ntheir appointment shall be effected by an Act which shall establish the specific \nduration of the mandate.  This mandate may be renewable, provided that the \npluralism of the institution's membership is ensured; \n(iii) adequate powers, so that National Human Rights Institutions can initiate \nenquiries and investigations, secure evidence and documents, consult Non-\nGovernmental Organisations and State institutions and publicise their reports, \nfindings and recommendations, and \n(iv) adequate resources, so that National Human Rights Institutions have the funding, \nstaffing, infrastructure and institutional capacity to perform their functions and \ndischarge their responsibilities without being subject to financial control which \nmight affect their independence. \n In the Annual Report, the National Human Rights Commission has acknowledged the \nindependence of the Commission by virtue of section 3(2) of the Protection of Human Rights \nAct, which stipulates that “the Commission shall not, in the exercise of its functions, be \nsubject to the direction or control of any other person or authority.” \nFurthermore, through the Annual Report 2025, the National Human Rights Commission \nhas set out its commitment to adhere to the Paris Principles. \nPresently, the National Human Rights Commission holds an accreditation status ‘A’ \nfrom the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI), which implies \nthat the Commission is fully compliant with the Paris Principles. \nFollowing third party representations by a Non-Governmental Organisation from \nMauritius, regarding certain aspects which may impact on the independence of the \nCommission, a special review session by the GANHRI Sub-Committee on Accreditation is \nscheduled at the end of April 2026 in Geneva. \nI am informed that there have been discussions between the Attorney General’s Office \nand the National Human Rights Commission with respect to the legislative amendments to be \nbrought to the Protection of Human Rights Act and a draft Bill has already been prepared to \nbe introduced in Parliament. \nCAUDAN ROUNDABOUT ACCIDENT – 40-TONNE CONCRETE MIXER TRUCK –\nINQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/331",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 331,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/331) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the road \naccident which occurred on Tuesday 31 March 2026 at the Caudan Roundabout, involving a \n40-tonne concrete mixer truck, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to where matters stand regarding the inquiry initiated \nthereinto, indicating whether the said vehicle was operating under a special permit or \nexemption during restricted hours and, if so, indicate the authority which granted same and \nthe conditions attached thereto.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that on Tuesday 31 March 2026 \nat around 07 15 hours, Police Officers of the Line Barracks Police Station proceeded to the \nCaudan Roundabout, Northbound, Port Louis, where a road accident involving a 40-tonne \nconcrete mixer truck and three other vehicles had occurred. \nDifferent units of the Police, the SAMU services and the Mauritius Fire and Rescue \nService attended to the scene of the accident promptly. Four persons had sustained injuries \nand were conveyed to Dr Jeetoo Hospital.  A traffic diversion plan was immediately \nimplemented for both oncoming vehicles from north and south bounds to ease the congested \ntraffic and to restore normal traffic flow. \nAn enquiry into the circumstances of the accident has been initiated by the Police and \nstatements from four persons involved in the accident have been recorded. The statement \nfrom the concrete mixer truck driver is yet to be recorded as he is still under treatment at \nhospital.   \nHowever, according to preliminary information gathered, the concrete mixer truck had \ndeparted from Betonix Stone Crusher at Ebene at around 06 30 hours and was proceeding \ntowards the North. Upon reaching the motorway, the driver encountered braking failure and \nhe continued towards Port Louis. At the Caudan Roundabout, the driver lost control of the \nvehicle thereafter hitting the handrails and collided with two private cars and one private bus. \nThe truck eventually overturned.  \nThere is no provision for the granting of any special permit or exemption for heavy \nvehicles to operate during 07 00 hours and 09 30 hours on weekdays. In fact, the Police \nNotice No. 2670, made under Section 181(3) of the Road Traffic Act, stipulates that all goods \nvehicles having unladen weight exceeding 3.5 tonne are prohibited from using specified \nroads from 07 00 hours and 09 30 hours on weekdays, as follows – \n(i) \nMotorway M1 from Phoenix Roundabout to Quay D Roundabout, Northbound; \n(ii) \nRoad A1 from St Jean Roundabout to Place D’Armes Port Louis via Rose Hill \nand Coromandel, in both directions; \n(iii) Road A14, Rose Hill Trianon Road from Vandermesch Roundabout to M1 at \nTrianon via Ebene, in both directions; \n(iv) Road B1 from Rose Hill Police Station to M1 at Reduit via Ebene, in both \ndirections, and \n(v) \nRoad B120 from University of Mauritius Roundabout to M1 via State House, in \nboth directions. \nAny breach of this provision constitutes an offence under the Road Traffic Act and \nliable to a fine not exceeding Rs200,000 and imprisonment for a term not exceeding five \nyears. \nOn 04 April 2026, the Police issued a Communiqué anew on the restrictions on heavy \ngoods vehicle and tractors, reminding the public of the offences to which they are liable. \nELECTORAL REFORMS – PUBLIC CONSULTATION EXERCISE – PROPOSALS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/332",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 332,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/332) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the public consultation exercise in respect of the proposed Electoral Reforms, he \nwill state the number of proposals received as at closing date, indicating –  \n(a)  whether a special team or committee has been set up to consider same, and  \n(b)   the timeframe for the preparation of a summary of the main proposals and whether \nsame will be circulated prior to the drafting of any new legislation in relation \nthereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMPF –POLICE OFFICERS CONDUCT – DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/333",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 333,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/333) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nMauritius Police Force (MPF), he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to whether he is in presence of complaints or reports \nin relation to the conduct of Police Officers potentially undermining the effective \nimplementation of law and order and, if so, indicate – \n(a) \nwhether internal reviews, investigations or disciplinary proceedings have been \ninitiated in connection therewith, giving details thereof, and \n(b)  the measures being taken to ensure that the MPF operates with full impartiality, \nprofessionalism and independence.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nHON. PAUL RAYMOND BÉRENGER – RESIGNATION – MEETING WITH PM",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/334",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 334,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/334) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,   Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the resignation of the Honourable Paul Raymond Bérenger, GCSK, as Deputy \nPrime Minister, he will state whether he met the said Honourable Member in the days prior to \nthe said resignation and, if so, indicate the reasons put forward by the latter therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nVIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN – STATISTICS, INVESTIGATIONS & SUPPORT \nFRAMEWORK",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/335",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 335,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/335) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to women, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the \nnumber thereof reportedly murdered or found dead in suspicious circumstances since 01 \nJanuary 2025 to date, indicating – \n(a)  where matters stand regarding the inquiries initiated thereinto, and  \n(b)  whether – \n(i)  \nan online assistance service for crime prevention is available thereto, and \n(ii)  consideration will be given for a counselling facility to be put at the \ndisposal of those at risk.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSBM HOLDINGS LTD – LOAN WRITE-OFFS (2014-2024) & BOARD \nACCOUNTABILITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/336",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 336,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/336) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to SBM Holdings Ltd., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nthe – \n(a)  percentage of shareholding of the Government of Mauritius therein, and  \n(b)  total amount of toxic loans written off over the period 2014 to 2024, indicating \nthe – \n(i)  \nactions taken to recoup same;  \n(ii)  names of the chairperson and head of the Credit Committee during the said \nperiod, and  \n(iii)  responsibility of the Board of Directors in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPUBLIC HOSPITALS – CASES OF ASSAULT – MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS – \nINQUIRIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/337",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 337,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/337) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,   Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the recent \nreported cases of assault on medical practitioners at the Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital and the Sir \nAnerood Jugnauth Hospital, he will for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to where matters stand regarding the inquiries \ninitiated thereinto, indicating – \n(a)  whether arrests have been effected in connection therewith and charges lodged, \nand  \n(b)  the additional measures being envisaged, in collaboration with the relevant \nauthorities, to enhance the safety and security of healthcare officers.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that two incidents have been \nreported at Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital and one at Sir Anerood Jugnauth (SAJ) Hospital, as \nfollows – \n(i) \non 10 March 2026, Dr. (Ms) D.B, Medical Health Officer at Jawaharlal Nehru \nHospital reported to Rose-Belle Police Station that she was victim of verbal and \nphysical assault by a female patient on 09 March 2026; \n(ii) \non 31 March 2026, Dr. M. S, Medical Practitioner at Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital \nreported to Rose-Belle Police Station that he was victim of assault by four men, \non 30 March 2026, at his place of work, and  \n(iii) on 29 March 2026, Dr. T.S., General Practitioner at SAJ Hospital, reported to the \nFlacq Police Station that he had been physically and verbally assaulted on the \nsame day by a group of 20 unknown persons.  \nWith regard to part (a) of the Question, concerning the assault on Dr (Ms) D.B. at \nJawaharlal Nehru Hospital, the alleged assailant, one Mrs V.E.R. aged 52, was not arrested as \nshe is currently bedridden.  \nWith regard to the assault on Dr. M.S. at Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital, two persons, \nnamely Mr. J.L.M.E. and Mr J.A.P.L. were arrested on 01 April 2026. They were \nprovisionally charged before Grand Port Court on 02 April 2026 for the offence of \n“Assaulting an agent of civil authority causing the effusion of blood”. They are both detained \nat Rose Belle Police Station. They will appear in court on 14 April 2026, that is, today.  \nRegarding the assault on Dr. T.S. at SAJ Hospital, on 02 April 2026, two persons, \nnamely Mr A.B. and Mr S.M., were arrested and provisionally charged before the Flacq \nCourt for the offence “Assaulting an agent of civil authority”. They were bailed out on 06 \nApril 2026.  \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Police that 13 Police Officers are currently \ndeployed at SAJ Hospital, and 9 Police Officers at Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital. They are \ndeployed on a 24/7 basis and operate on three shifts.  \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Ministry of Health and \nWellness that private security services are already available in all regional hospitals. The \nMinistry is considering the possibility of the deployment of additional security personnel at \ndifferent strategic points within hospitals.  \nOn 31 March 2026, hon. Anil Bachoo, Minister of Health and Wellness held a press \nconference whereby he strongly condemned the aggressions against healthcare professionals \non duty and pledged for firm legal action against the perpetrators.  \nI totally concur with the serious concerns expressed by hon. Bachoo. Such irresponsible \nconducts will not be tolerated and immediate actions will be taken against perpetrators. To \nthis end, the Commissioner of Police in consultation with the Ministry of Health and \nWellness, is currently reviewing its deployment plan in hospitals, to have an increased \nnumber of Police Officers posted at the five regional hospitals, for enhanced safety of \nmedical, paramedical, staff and patients. \nPLAINE CORAIL AIRPORT – NEW RUNWAY CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/338",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 338,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/338) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the project for the \nconstruction of a new runway at Plaine Corail Airport, in Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from Airports of Mauritius Co. Ltd., information as to where matters \nstand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCÔTE D’OR – SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE ESTABLISHMENT – INCENTIVE & \nECONOMIC IMPACT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/339",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 339,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/339) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the proposed \nestablishment of a Special Economic Zone at Côte d’Or, he will state the – \n(a)  proposed incentive package for prospective promoters, developers and operators \nthereof;  \n(b)  estimated financial cost thereof to Government, and  \n(c)  anticipated tangible benefits for the Mauritian economy in terms of foreign direct \ninvestment and job creation.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nINTERNATIONAL AIR TRAVEL ROUTES – MIDDLE EAST CRISIS IMPACT –\nMAURITIUS AIR CONNECTIVITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/340",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 340,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/340) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to international air \ntravel routes, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from Airports of Mauritius Ltd., \ninformation as to – \n(a)  the impact of the Middle East crisis on the flights operated between Mauritius and \nAsia, in particular China, and  \n(b)  whether consideration will be given for positioning Mauritius as an air corridor \nbetween Asia and Africa and seeking a strategic partnership for Air Mauritius Ltd. \nwith an airline from the Middle East.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nNATIONAL ELECTRONIC LICENSING SYSTEM – AVAILABLE SERVICES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/341",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 341,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/341) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the National Electronic Licensing System, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Economic Development Board, information as to the number of services \ncurrently available thereon, indicating whether consideration will be given for the provision \nof additional types of licences thereon.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed by the Economic Development Board that the National \nElectronic Licensing System (NELS) is a central digital platform, developed with the support \nof the European Union, and is operational since 2018.  \nThe system streamlines and digitises the processing of licences, permits, and clearances \nissued across various public sector agencies.  It aims to improve ease of doing business by \nreducing processing times, enhancing transparency, promoting inter-agency collaboration, \nand providing a single access point for applicants.  \nIn addition, the platform also facilitates online payments within permit workflows and \nprovides data to support evidence-based policy decisions.  \nHowever, since its inception in 2018, only 24 services are operational.   \nSince this Government took office, I requested the EDB to perform a review exercise of \nthe NELS strategy, technology, human resource requirements and financing for the next 10 \nyears that would allow the NELS platform to be ‘Fit for Future’. \nThe EDB has now finalised a 10-year Blueprint for the NELS platform covering the \nperiod 2025-2035 as well as a 5-year Implementation Action Plan. \nAs per the Plan, the total number of services should reach 32 by end of this year. These \nnew services that will be hosted on the platform include, among others, –  \n(i) \nthe rule-based work permit system to expedite the recruitment of foreign labour \nand skills; \n(ii) \nthe residence permit; \n(iii) the registration of real estate agents, and \n(iv) the shipping registration. \nFurthermore, we want to increase the number of services to 40 by end of 2027.  \nIn addition, the EDB is working at modernising the platform with the application of \nArtificial Intelligence to accelerate the digitalisation of additional permits and licences. \nThe NELS will play a major role in the new economic model, which is driven by \ninvestment rather than consumption. We will see to it that the EDB accelerates its \ndevelopment. \nCHAGOS AGREEMENT– BIOT JUDGMENT CONSEQUENCES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/342",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 342,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/342) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nAgreement signed between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and \nNorthern Ireland and the Government of the Republic of Mauritius concerning the Chagos \nArchipelago including Diego Garcia, he will state the consequences, if any, of the judgment \ndelivered by the Supreme Court (British Indian Ocean Territory) on 31 March 2026 on the \nratification thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRACING DOPING CASE – MR D. S. – INQUIRY & OUTCOME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/343",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 343,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/343) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the case \nof Mr D. S. tested positive for cocaine following a test carried out on or about 18 October \n2025, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Gambling Regulatory Authority, \ninformation as to whether the Racing Stewards of the Horse Racing Integrity and Doping \nUnit has initiated an inquiry thereinto and, if so, indicate the outcome thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD – DEPUTY CEO (MR S.M.) – \nAPPOINTMENT & CONTRACT RENEWAL",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/344",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 344,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/344) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mr. S. M., Deputy \nChief Executive Officer of the Economic Development Board, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to – \n (a)  his date of appointment and the terms and conditions thereof, and \n (b)  the circumstances under which his contract was renewed, indicating the terms and \nconditions of his new contract.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSSR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – PARALLEL RUNWAY CONSTRUCTION – \nLAND ACQUISITION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/345",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 345,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/345) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nproposed construction of a parallel runway at the Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam International \nAirport, as provided for in the Airport Master Plan, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from Airports of Mauritius Ltd., information as to where matters stand regarding the \nacquisition of land from the owners in the vicinity of the airport, indicating if the latter have \nbeen apprised thereof.",
      "answer": "Reply: I wish to refer the hon. Member to my reply to Parliamentary Question B/276 of \nour Sitting of 08 April 2025, when I informed the House that Airports of Mauritius Co. Ltd \nwas planning to appoint a new Chartered Property Valuer and Land Surveyor to review and \nupdate the existing reports of 49 properties at Chat Gaon and the remaining 12 at Solitude \nvillage for negotiation thereafter. \nOn 20 August 2025, the services of the Chartered Property Valuer and Land Surveyor, \nwhich were initially retained in 2019, were enlisted by Airports of Mauritius Co. Ltd for this \nexercise on grounds of continuity of service. A draft report, which was submitted on 02 \nFebruary 2026, has recommended the adoption of a negotiation approach guided by \nreinstatement costs which may serve as ceiling value. \nThe draft report is presently under consideration by Airports of Mauritius Co. Ltd and \nis expected to be finalised next month. Thereafter, the process will be subject to all necessary \nclearances, including negotiation with owners. \nMAHEBOURG MUSEUM – RENOVATION WORKS – RE-OPENING DATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/346",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 346,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/346) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the proposed setting up of a cultural desk \nthat would act as a one-stop shop for concert organisers and artists, he will state where \nmatters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPETIT RAFFRAY – MULTI-PURPOSE SPORTS ARENA – CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/347",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 347,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/347) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre d’Or) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to Petit Raffray Village, he will \nstate whether consideration will be given for the construction of a Multi-Purpose Sports \nArena equipped with full facilities thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGENERAL PRACTITIONERS – STUDY LEAVE WITHOUT PAY – POSTGRAD \nDETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/348",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 348,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/348) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to General \nPractitioners of the public health sector currently on study leave without pay to pursue \npostgraduate studies, he will give the list thereof, indicating in each case, the – \n(a) \nuniversity being attended; \n(b) \nfield of specialty, and \n(c) \nduration thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, I am informed that at present, there are around 108 \ngeneral practitioners who have been granted study leave without pay to pursue postgraduate \nstudies. \nWith regard to the list of general practitioners, the names thereof cannot be divulged for \nconfidentiality reasons. \nConcerning part (b) of the question regarding the list of universities – \n(a) China, Dalian Medical University; \n(b) \nHuazhong University of Science and Technology; \n(c) \nNanjing Medical University; \n(d) \nEgypt, Cairo University; \n(e) \nGermany, Academic Teaching Hospital, Wilhelm University; \n(f) \nAsklepios Specialist Clinic Lubben, Brandenburg; \n(g) \nBad Hersfeld Hospital; \n(h) \nGoAcademy Düsseldorf; \n(i) \nISL Sprachschule University; \n(j) \nMedical Association of WestphliaUppe, Munster; \n(k) \nNeprologicum Westfalen GbR; \n(l) \nRuhr University of Bochum; \n(m) St Vincent-Kran Ken Hous Limbury Hospital; \n(n) \nMalaysia, University Sains; \n(o) \nSouth Africa, Nelson Mandela School of Medicine. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister, may I? I am sorry. Is it okay to table this? \nMr Bachoo: Yes, of course. I am going to submit a copy of the list. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, it is purely factual. \nMr Bachoo: I am going to submit a copy of the list. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, if you do not mind. It is purely factual!  \nHon. Caserne, you do not mind?  \nMr Caserne: Yes, no issue! \nMadam Speaker: Go ahead! \nMr Caserne: May I also the hon. Minister whether all the universities that he \nmentioned are currently recognised by the Medical Council of Mauritius? Is proper \nverification made prior approval to these leaves? \nMadam Speaker: Proper? I did not get the last bit. \nMr Caserne: Is prior verification done prior approval of these leaves? \nMr Bachoo: Normally, when they leave for further studies after their MBBS course, \nthen, they do not ask permission. Even the law does not compel them to seek the clearance \nfrom the Medical Council. But, in fact, we are thinking of amending the law so that before \nproceeding abroad for studies, they will be bound to, at least, have their names registered \nand they have to mention the universities where they are going. As at now, it is not \ncompulsory. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister, in view of a \nshortage of medical doctors in the public sector, how does he compensate for the large \nnumber of junior doctors who opt to go for tertiary studies? Should he now be considering a \nstaggered release of these doctors so that we have sufficient enough to replace them in the \npublic sector? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister! \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, this is a fact. There is a shortage of doctors. But you \ncannot compel them to stay. If they want to go for higher studies; many of them leave their \njobs and they go. That is the reason why the speciality which is missing, like geriatrics and \ngynaecology, in these particular fields, we are allowing them. Whereas in other fields, where \nwe have enough doctors, we try to discourage them. But unfortunately, we cannot compel \nthem to stay in the hospitals. That is the reason why we are now trying to get doctors who can \nwork on sessional basis. We are trying to get a few of them. \nSecondly, we are also recruiting additional doctors on contract. It is a fact that we have \na shortage of doctors, but we cannot compel to give up, that is, not to go abroad. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. A. Duval! \nMr A. Duval: May I ask the hon. Minister on the other hand, what about the scarcity \nareas? What incentives are being given by his Ministry to encourage doctors? \nMadam Speaker: Non, là, c’est une autre question. \nMr A. Duval: Non, c’est la même question.  \nMadam Speaker: Non, non, non! \nMr A. Duval: Whether there are any incentives being given to the doctors? \nMadam Speaker:  I am not allowing this question! \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, let me ask the question. \nMadam Speaker: You cannot! I am giving a ruling.  \n(Interruptions) \nI do not think… \nMr A. Duval: It is about doctors! May I ask the question? \nMadam Speaker: No, because it does not arise!  \n(Interruptions) \nYou are still standing while I am speaking! \nMr A. Duval: But you have not listened to the question! \nMadam Speaker: I know what the question is. Please, sit down. \nAn hon. Member: Asize, to pe argue la! \nMadam Speaker: I am not allowing this question, otherwise we can have ten questions \non the doctors who are… \nMr A. Duval: But the previous question was whether we can block from looking for \nincentives and it is not relevant? \nAn hon. Member: Do not get over-excited! \nMadam Speaker: So, you are going to question my ruling? Okay, I am going next to \nhon. Rookny. \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, on a point of information first, since my PQ B/323 has \nbeen reallocated to the hon. Minister of Health, should I come with that first or should I… \nMadam Speaker: No, no. You go to that question. This one! \nMr Rookny: So, B/349. \nMadam Speaker: Voilà ! \nTRIOLET, A4 ROAD – TRAFFIC CONGESTION – ROAD MARKINGS \nIMPLEMENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/349",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 349,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/349) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the persistent road traffic congestion on \nthe A4 at Triolet during peak hours, on the stretch thereof from the Total Energies Service \nStation to the Fire Services Station, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nTraffic Management and Road Safety Unit, information as to whether road markings, \nincluding double yellow lines, have been uniformly implemented and enforced thereat and, if \nnot, indicate – \n(a) \nthe reasons therefor, and  \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given for urgent corrective measures to be taken in \nrelation thereto.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the TMRSU that the stretch \nof road in Triolet from Total Energies Service Station up to the Fire Services Station along \nthe Terre Rouge-Triolet-Grand Baie A4 road is approximately 4.5 kilometres long and is a \nvital artery for vehicular traffic that experiences significant pressure during peak hours. A \ntechnical assessment carried out indicates that the primary cause of congestion in this area is \nchronic on-site and haphazard parking. This is largely attributed to the high number of \nvehicles, high volume of commercial activities in the area where businesses operate without \nadequate off-street parking for customers and delivery vehicles. \nAs regards part (a) of the question, I am advised that double yellow lines are present \nalong the majority of the stretch of the road referred to above. However, their effectiveness is \nbeing undermined by persistent non-compliance by drivers, recurrent obstruction to private \naccesses and illegal curb side parking continue to impede the smooth traffic flow. \nEnforcement of compliance with road markings rest with the Police. My Ministry coordinates \nwith them to step up enforcement in the region, particularly during peak hours with a view to \neasing the traffic problems being experienced.  The TMRSU has been tasked also to conduct \na fresh site visit to determine if additional interventions in terms of refreshed markings or \nother traffic measures are required to deal with the problem.  \nIn the same context, I look forward to collaboration from my colleague, the hon. \nMinister of Local Government, also elected Member hon. Woochit of Constituency No. 5, \nwhere Triolet is located, to redrawing of yellow lines where needed. As a matter of fact, the \nhon. Minister and I had working sessions on this subject last year and some very positive \ndecisions had been reached, particularly on how we can expedite matters on road markings. \nWe need to put these recommendations into action. Where necessary, we will have to rope in \nthe RDA of my colleague, the hon. Ajay Gunness’ Ministry as well. \nMadam Speaker, while we impose fines and penalties to maintain smooth traffic flow \nand road safety, it is important to recognise that enforcement alone cannot be the sole \nsolution. The public must also take collective responsibility and be introspective for their \nactions and their adverse impact on the road users by respecting parking regulations and \nbeing mindful of how their behaviour affects traffic flow. Responsible parking does not only \nreduce congestion but also ensures that the road infrastructure serves its real purpose for the \nwelfare and good of the community at large.  \nMoreover, Madam Speaker, if last Friday’s Cabinet decision on the promotion of \ncarpooling is adhered to, especially during peak hours, this will go a long way towards \nreducing traffic congestion, not only in Triolet but island wide. The more so, important in the \npresent context where the price of fuel has skyrocketed, thereby impacting heavily on our \neconomy. As a matter of interest, in relation to the Cabinet decision to favour carpooling, this \nmorning, in fact, my Ministry has received from proponents of carpooling their wish to assist \nGovernment in this endeavour by availing the latest technology, that means apps and AI. \nThese proponents are already using that technology with a few private enterprises in \nMauritius. I shall be meeting with them, on their request, to see how we can move this \nimportant initiative of Government forward. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Rookny! \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, the hon. Minister mentioned the use of apps. Is he aware \nthat there is also trade unions that are opposing the use of these apps. Will he advise how will \nthis affect their business? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Do you mean against using the apps that promote carpooling? \nThe apps that I referred to are to promote, people can go into these apps to hop on onto a \nvehicle that is willing to provide carpooling facilities. Is this what you are saying? \nMr Rookny: Uber. \nMr Osman Mahomed: No, Uber is… Sorry. \nMadam Speaker: I cannot follow. What was the answer, hon. Minister? \nMr Osman Mahomed: The hon. Member had questioned me on the apps that… \nMadam Speaker: Yes, I know but what did you reply? \nMr Osman Mahomed: The apps that I referred to in my substantive reply, Madam \nSpeaker, refer to apps that seek to promote carpooling. That means people who have spare \ncapacity in their cars can offer seats to other people. This will go a long way to reduce… \nMadam Speaker: Okay, car pooling. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Carpooling, yes. \nAn hon. Member: Car fooling! \nMadam Speaker: You are right, yes. \nMr Rookny: Will the hon. Minister advise the House if he is aware the chronical \nproblems he mentioned also spread to the laterals of the Triolet main road that feeds that \nroad? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes, I am sure it does… \nMadam Speaker: We are still on double lines, right? \nMr Osman Mahomed: And in Triolet. \nMadam Speaker: Right. \nMr Osman Mahomed: In Triolet. I am sure it does, Madam Speaker, because if the \nmain road is congested, those coming from the lateral certainly be blocked. \nMadam Speaker: Every way. \nMr Osman Mahomed: That is why we need to reduce the number of vehicles and the \nbusiness owners along that stretch of the road have to make sure that their clients do not park \ntheir cars on that vital artery of Triolet. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, good. We have got it. We have got a little bit more time now. \nHon. Beejan! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 6 – BUS ROUTES – COVERED BUS SHELTERS - \nINSTALLATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/350",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 350,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/350) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to bus routes in Constituency No. 6, he will \nstate whether consideration is being given for the installation of covered bus shelters along \nsame and, if so, indicate the expected start and completion dates thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the NLTA that 18 bus routes \nare being operated across Constituency No. 6, Grand Baie and Poudre D’or. This implies that \nwe have scores of bus stopping places, some already provided with bus shelters and \nobviously, some not yet, otherwise there would not be the question. \nThe provision of bus shelters is a collaborative effort involving the local authority \nconcerned and the Road Development Authority, the National Land Transport Authority, and \nthe Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit of my Ministry. According to information \nprovided by the TMRSU, since 2019, several smart bus shelters have been installed by the \nlatter in Constituency No. 6, namely in – \n• \nGrand Baie; \n• \nSt François; \n• \nPointe aux Cannoniers; \n• \nCap Malheureux; \n• \nPoudre D’or. \nI am further informed that the District Council of Rivière du Rempart has recently \ninstalled smart bus shelters at Mapou and L’Esperance Piton. Under the newly signed \nframework agreement, the TMRSU will install a smart bus shelter near the Vale Government \nSchool. As the components of the structure involve specialised units that have to be procured \nfrom abroad, works are only expected to be completed by November 2026. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to reassure the hon. Member that Ministry is actually seeking to \nrespond to all demands with regard to the construction and maintenance of bus shelters across \nthe island. All requests are duly noted and surveys are carried out with appropriate \nrecommendations. I wish to point out that one of the challenges faced by my Ministry is the \nquestion of funding. I must underline that funds made available in the yearly budget \nencompass different types projects geared towards road enhancement and road safety and are \nused to meet the needs arising from all over the island. \nMoreover, I wish to highlight that the Ministry has a protocol – I think this is an \nimportant part for the hon. Member – on the modernisation of bus shelters. The purpose of \nthis protocol is to introduce comprehensive guidelines for the provision of bus shelters on \nmain roads and motorways. The aim is to facilitate the construction of new bus shelters by \ninterested promoters… \nMadam Speaker: Exactly. \nMr Osman Mahomed: …as well as renovation and maintenance of the existing bus \nshelters and demolition and replacement of any bus shelter which is in a deplorable state \nalong the main roads and motorways while adhering to the existing legal framework and \nsubject to all clearances being obtained at no cost to the Government. In return, they may use \nthe bus shelters for advertising purposes as per conditions stipulated in the protocol. Upon \ncompletion of the said surveys – I go on – and availability of funds, the Ministry is requested \nto either fund the construction of additional smart bus shelters or seek the participation of \nprivate promoters to construct bus shelters strictly as per established protocol. \nMadam Speaker, I acknowledge that construction of bus shelters in Constituency No. 6, \nand elsewhere, is a necessary infrastructure for the convenience of passengers. Construction \nof shelters in any region cannot be undertaken at one go due to budgetary constraints. It is a \nprocess which spills over consecutive financial years.  \nHowever, I wish to reassure the hon. Member that my Ministry will, within available \nmeans, consider all requests positively, subject to availability of land and all road safety \nissues being complied with. \nAs regards Constituency No. 6, the TMRSU and the NLTA will be requested to carry \nout a survey and establish the priority needs. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, one question, then, Mr Beechook. \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. In view of several complaints and requests \nfrom inhabitants of St. François, Cap Malheureux, Roche Terre, Grand Gaube, Petit Raffray, \nVale, Fond du Sac, Vingt Pieds, Péreybère and Grand Baie, will the hon. Minister arrange for \na consultative meeting with the representatives of villages in the Constituency Grand Baie-\nPoudre d’Or, along with relevant stakeholders prior to any action taken? \nMadam Speaker: Short and sweet! \nMr Osman Mahomed: Will do! \nMadam Speaker: Will do, good! Mr Beechook! \nMr Beechook: Is the hon. Minister aware that whenever, we, MP representatives of \nconstituencies send requests for bus shelters, it turns out to be a hot potato which the RDA \nthrows at the TMRSU, and the TMRSU throws at the RDA? Isn’t it time to set up a specific \nagency or division that implements the bus shelters for the well-being of the citizens of this \ncountry? \nMadam Speaker: Again, short and sweet. Very simple! \nMr Osman Mahomed: If you ask me about a specific department in my Ministry, it is \nmy remit. \nMadam Speaker: No. \nMr Osman Mahomed: But if it is another Ministry, I am afraid this is not of my remit. \nMadam Speaker: But you will think of a good solution! \nMr Osman Mahomed: We will think about it. Madam Speaker, we will remove the \nping-pong table. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, remove the ping-pong. He is removing the ping-pong! \nMr Osman Mahomed: The ping-pong table so that there is no… \nMadam Speaker: Very good! Ms J. Bérenger, last question. \nTOURISM ACT AMENDMENTS – MARINE MAMMALS PROTECTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/351",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 351,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floréal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. B/351) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the \nMinister of Tourism whether, in regard to the proposed introduction in the Assembly of \namendments to the Tourism Act for the enhanced protection of marine mammals within our \nwaters, he will state where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr R. Duval: Merci, Madam la présidente.  \nLes activités d’observation des dauphins et baleines et de nage avec les dauphins sont \npratiquées sur la côte sud-ouest de Maurice par quelques 100 embarcations de plaisance sur \n278 titulaires d’une licence délivrée par la Tourism Authority. \nDans ma réponse à la question parlementaire B/985 du 11 novembre 2025, j’ai informé \nl’Assemblée nationale qu’un premier projet de règlement, visant à encadrer la conduite de ces \ndeux activités, avait été élaboré par mon ministère. Ces nouveaux règlements prévoient un \ncertain nombre d’exigences auxquelles toutes embarcations de plaisance pratiquant les \nactivités susmentionnées devront obligatoirement se conformer. \nMadame la présidente, j’avais aussi indiqué que le projet de règlement avait été soumis \nà toutes les parties prenantes concernées pour la validation avant sa promulgation. Les \norganisations non gouvernementales (ONG), à savoir Eco-Sud, Marine Megafauna \nConservation Organisation (MMCO), ont indiqué n’avoir aucune objection à l’activité \nd’observation des dauphins et des baleines, mais réclament que la nage avec les dauphins soit \ninterdite. La Federation of Pleasure Craft Operators (FOPCO), qui regroupe les 278 \nopérateurs, demande le maintien de l’activité nage avec les dauphins et avec allègement des \ncontraintes règlementaires. \nMadame la présidente, compte tenu de ces propositions divergentes, j’ai présidé \nplusieurs réunions avec les parties concernées en vue de parvenir à un consensus sur la \nconduite de l’activité de nage avec les dauphins et au cours de ces réunions, je dois dire que \nplusieurs insuffisances dans l’application des règles encadrant cette activité, ont été relevées.  \nLors de la dernière réunion du 10 mars, les parties prenantes présentes ont convenu que \nsi l’activité devrait se poursuivre, une équipe d’intervention, enforcement squad, devrait être \nmise en place. Cette équipe devrait être composée d’agents de la National Coast Guard, de la \nTourism Authority, de la Fisheries Division du ministère de l’Agro-industrie, et chacune de \nces entités disposant des compétences spécifiques en matière de contrôle. L’équipe \nd’intervention devra travailler conjointement, de manière coordonnée, afin d’assurer des \npratiques raisonnables en matière d’observation des dauphins et des baleines, ainsi que la \nnage avec les dauphins à Maurice. \nLes ressources supplémentaires requises en termes d’équipements, d’embarcation de \npersonnel, de drones, de formations, etc., afin de permettre à cette équipe d’intervention de \nfonctionner efficacement et de manière efficiente, devront être communiquées à mon \nministère dans les plus brefs délais. \nMadame la présidente, dès réception de ces informations, une décision sera prise quant \nau maintien ou non de l’activité de nage avec les dauphins. Madame la présidente, j’insiste \nque nous devions absolument assurer la protection des mammifères marins, de notre \nécosystème marin et aussi protéger l’image de l’île Maurice. Nous devrons, d’autre part, tenir \ncompte des moyens de subsistance des cent opérateurs aussi, engagés dans ces activités, ainsi \nque de leurs employés et de leurs familles et surtout le contexte économique difficile \nactuellement. Donc, une décision courageuse devra être prise collectivement sur la base de la \ndécision qui sera prise et les règlements appropriés seront élaborés. \nMadam Speaker: Oui, allez-y ! \nMs J. Bérenger: Je vous remercie. L’honorable ministre a fait référence à sa réponse à \nla PQ B/985 où il affirmait qu’un draft des regulations avait été circulé à tous les \nstakeholders. Comment est-ce qu’il réconcilie cette affirmation avec le courriel de la MMCO \n– où je suis en copie – qui a été adressé au ministre suite à la réponse à sa PQ et où \nl’organisation affirme n’avoir jamais reçu le draft des regulations ? Comment une \nconsultation peut-elle être réellement significative si l’organisation qui est la plus concernée \npar le sujet n’est pas consultée et n’a pas accès au projet de loi ? \nMadam Speaker: Allons attendre sa réponse. On ne sait pas. Est-ce qu’ils n’ont pas \nreçu ? Vous avez envoyé? \nMr R. Duval: Madame la présidente, you know exactly where lies the problem. You \nwere in several meetings. \nMadam Speaker: No, no! Speak to me! Minister, speak to me, please! \nMr R. Duval: Yes, several meetings, of which you are very aware of. The big concern, \nI must say, about these regulations is: who is going to take care, to take lead? No one knows. \nWe have got three entities: the National Coast Guard… \nMadam Speaker: Minister! Minister, may I? May I? The question was on this \norganisation which said that they did not receive the communication. Just let… \nMr R. Duval: But they can start again and come back to me. There are no worries \nabout it. \nMs J. Bérenger: C’est ce qu’ils ont fait. \nMr R. Duval: I did not receive any… \nMadam Speaker: Apparemment, ils vous ont écrit. \nMr R. Duval: I did not receive. If you got any… \nMadam Speaker: No, no! Careful! Careful! \nMr R. Duval: …no problem, give it to me. \nMadam Speaker: Ask your next question! \nMr R. Duval: Give it to me. With pleasure, I will. \nMs J. Bérenger: Je vais déposer… \nMadam Speaker: Vous voulez déposer. \nMs J. Bérenger: …pas sur la table. Je vais communiquer au ministre encore une fois \nune copie du courriel. \nMadam Speaker: Au ministre, d’accord. \nMs J. Bérenger: Mais, il l’a reçu, ça lui a été adressé. \nMadam Speaker: No statement! \nMs J. Bérenger: L’honorable ministre peut-il donner un calendrier précis de quand ces \nregulations vont devenir une réalité, étant donné que ce dossier est en suspens depuis plus \nd’un an malgré plusieurs relances, y compris à travers le comité interministériel qui était \ndirigé par l’ex-DPM ? Plusieurs relances ont été faites et le projet est toujours en suspens. \nPeut-il donner un calendrier précis ? \nMr R. Duval: Madame la présidente, je dois dire qu’il est très important de souligner \nque c’est un règlement très complexe parce que nous avons environ 100 opérateurs de \nbateaux de plaisance qui défendent cette activité actuellement et d’un côté, nous avons les \nONG et d’autres autorités qui nous demandent d’interdire la nage avec les dauphins. Nous \ndevrons être très prudents, Madame la présidente, et veiller à ce que les informations \nappropriées et précises soient recueillies afin qu’une décision soit prise. Mais, aussi, je peux \ndire que mon ministère poursuit actuellement les consultations avec les différentes parties \nprenantes afin de finaliser les terms of reference de l’enforcement squad. Une fois cette étape \nachevée, je présenterai au Conseil des ministres un document sur la question afin qu’une \ndécision collective soit prise. \nMs J. Bérenger: Nous n’avons toujours pas de calendrier, ni de timeline. Il n’y a pas \nque la nage avec les dauphins qui pose problème aujourd’hui. Le ministre est très bien au \ncourant. La nage illégale avec les baleines est un gros problème. Les scientifiques ont \nmentionné que la population de nos cachalots résidents n’a cessé de diminuer et est arrivée, \naujourd’hui, à uniquement 25 cachalots. Donc, l’honorable ministre ne convient-il pas que ce \nretard prolongé compromet à la fois les efforts de conservation et la crédibilité de Maurice en \ntant que destination touristique durable ? \nMr R. Duval : Je suis au courant de tout cela, Madame la présidente. Mais il faut \nprendre en considération une chose: l’implementation de tout ça demande un budget. Et tout \nce qui s’appelle budget, ça arrive bientôt. Nous avons la National Coast Guard qui n’a pas de \nbudget. Nous avons la Tourism Authority qui n’a pas de budget. Nous avons Fisheries qui n’a \npas de budget. Donc, comment faire ? On peut parler aujourd’hui, et demain, faire mille \nréunions. Mais le point le plus important, c’est les fonds. C’est l’argent. C’est le budget. C’est \nle ministère des Finances qui doit nous en donner. Alors, comment on fait ? \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker : Oui, j’attends qu’il ait fini. Question ! \nMs J. Bérenger: Il a déjà eu une proposition pour cela.  \nMadam Speaker: Question ! Question ! \nMs J. Bérenger: Le MMCO a proposé… \nMadam Speaker: Non, Mademoiselle! Question, question ! \nMs J. Bérenger: Le ministre est-il au courant que la MMCO a proposé un conservation \nfee pour rendre obligatoire et financer l’enforcement justement ? Donc, il y a une solution. Il \nsuffit d’avoir la volonté politique ! \nMadam Speaker: Pas de commentaires ! \nMr R. Duval : J’ai déjà répondu, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! \nMs J. Bérenger : Non, pas sur le conservation fee ! \nMadam Speaker: Question on this side! \nMs J. Bérenger : Pe sove ! \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Members: Ey !  \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente.  \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Chut ! \nMs Anquetil: Le ministre peut-il indiquer à la Chambre, dans le cadre de cette \néventuelle législation, quelles mesures il compte prendre pour les opérateurs exerçant dans \nles espaces marins et risquant de perdre leurs emplois ainsi que leurs seuls moyens de \nsubsistance ? Merci. \nMadam Speaker: Je croyais qu’on avait déjà répondu à ça. \nMs Anquetil: Mais j’ai le droit de poser des questions. \nMadam Speaker: Mais ça a déjà été répondu. \nMr R. Duval: J’ai déjà répondu à cette question-là. Comme je vous ai dit, Madame la \nprésidente, … \nMadam Speaker: Non, on ne va pas répéter là. Moi, j’ai entendu ! \nMr R. Duval : J’ai déjà répondu à ça, mais comme je vous ai dit… \nMs Anquetil: Les deux mesures ! \nMr R. Duval: Les mesures que je vous ai dites.  \nJ’insiste, Madame la présidente, que nous devrons assurer la protection… \nMadam Speaker: Les deux, vous avez dit ! \nMr R. Duval: Oui. La protection des mammifères marins de notre écosystème marin.  \nAussi, comme l’a si bien dit l’honorable membre, l’image de l’île Maurice. Mais nous \ndevrons aussi, d’autre part, comme je vous le dis, tenir compte des moyens de subsistance de \ncent opérateurs engagés dans cette activité ainsi que des employés et de leurs familles, surtout \ndans le contexte économique actuel.  \nDonc, ce sera une décision courageuse qui devra être prise collectivement sur la base de \nla décision et des règlements appropriés. Mais c’est le Cabinet qui va décider. \nMadam Speaker: Oui, mais dans pas trop longtemps ! \nJ’arrête là. C’est l’heure du déjeuner ! Merci beaucoup! \nAt 1.08 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.33 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: We start with Mr Quirin! \nCHEBEL FOOTBALL GROUND – SYNTHETIC PITCH – MAINTENANCE & \nREHABILITATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/352",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 352,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/352) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Chebel Football ground, he will \nstate whether his Ministry is in presence of any representation from the Municipal Council of \nBeau-Bassin/Rose-Hill as to the dilapidated state of the synthetic pitch thereat and, if so, \nindicate the measures being envisaged in relation thereto, if any.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I am informed that the Lindsay Law Kwan Football \nPlayground at Chebel was converted into an outdoor synthetic football pitch in 2020 by \ncontractor Best Care Ltd. The works were completed and handed over to the Municipal \nCouncil of Beau-Bassin/Rose-Hill on 30 January 2021. The facility was subsequently \ninaugurated on 13 August 2021.  \nThereafter, due to normal wear and tear over time, maintenance and rehabilitation \nworks became necessary. \nMadam Speaker, in view of the observed deterioration, bids were invited through the e-\nprocurement system on 28 October 2025 for the maintenance of synthetic football pitch at \nseven sites, including the Lindsay Law Kwan Football ground. The contract was awarded to \nGrassworld Ltd, being the lowest evaluated responsive bidder for a sum of Rs238.50, \ninclusive of VAT.  \nThe scope of works includes cleaning of the playing surface, replacement of damaged \nsynthetic turf, mechanical bushing, installation of silica and rubber granules, replacement of \nworn-out field markings as well as a general repair and rehabilitation of the pitch and \nassociated facilities. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed that works have already started on site. \nHowever, following recent complaints from inhabitants and observations made by the \nMunicipal Council, certain discrepancies have been noted in the execution of the works. \nThese issues have been largely attributed to the persistent heavy rainfall experienced since \nlast week which has affected the proper setting and adhesion of the materials used \nparticularly the glue. \nA site visit is being carried out today with the contractor Grassworld Ltd in the presence \nof the relevant officers of the Municipal Council to thoroughly assess the situation. The \ncontractor has been formerly instructed to redo at his own cost any works that are not to the \nrequired standards or not to the satisfaction of the Council. \nMadam Speaker, I am also informed that the Welfare Committee has requested that a \ntechnical evaluation of the material used including the glue be conducted to ensure full \ncompliance with prescribed norms and standard. I wish to make it clear that no payment \nwhatsoever will be effected to the contractor until all works have been completed \nsatisfactorily, certified by the relevant officers of the Municipal Council and fully compliant \nwith contractual specifications. \nMadam Speaker, the Municipal Council continues to closely monitor the situation and \nhas also undertaken cleaning and maintenance of the surrounding areas to ensure a safe \nenvironment for users. I wish to reassure the hon. Member that all necessary corrective \nmeasures are being taken promptly so that the facility is restored to its full functionality and \nto the expected standards. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes. \nMr Quirin: Merci, Madame la présidente. Vu que les travaux qui sont apparemment \ndéjà complétés mais qui n’ont pas été entrepris à la satisfaction du conseil municipal et de \ntout un chacun, peut-on savoir s’il existe un contrat de maintenance, – vu que même après \nquelques jours que les travaux ont été complétés, on a constaté des lacunes au niveau de la \nfinition – qui lie bien sûr le conseil municipal au contracter, et si tel est le cas, quels sont les \nclauses et quel est la durée de ce contrat de maintenance ? \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I do not have this information right now. I can get it for \nthe next meeting. I can table it. \nMadam Speaker: The next question has been withdrawn. \nBLACK RIVER DISTRICT COURT – BUILDING – RENOVATION WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/353",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 353,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/353) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nAttorney-General whether, in regard to the building which formerly housed the Black River \nDistrict Court at Bambous, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the \ncurrent state thereof, indicating – \n(a) \nsince when same is closed; \n(b) \nwhether funds have been earmarked for the renovation thereof and, if so, indicate \nthe expected start and completion dates thereof, and \n(c) \nwhether any security services are provided thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMadam Speaker: Now, we have the hon. Third Member for Rodrigues! \nCARDIAC PACEMAKERS – PATIENTS – CURRENT STOCK & \nREPLACEMENT BATTERIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/354",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 354,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/354) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the \nMinister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard cardiac pacemakers, he will state the – \n(a) \nnumber of patients currently living therewith and being treated in the public \nhealth sector, and \n(b) \ncurrent stock thereof and of replacement batteries therefor in the public health \nsector.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, cardiac pacemakers are devices with a battery life of \naround 8 to 10 years. Used to control abnormal heart beat rhythm, beat abnormally low or \nabnormally higher than normal heart beat. Cardiac pacemaker’s implantations are carried in \neach of the cardiac units of five regional hospitals as well as the cardiac centre. There are \nthree types of pacemakers – \n(i) \nsingle chamber pacemaker; \n(ii) \ndual chamber pacemaker, and \n(iii) triple chamber pacemaker.  \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that the number of cardiac pacemaker implantations \ncarried out in public health institutions for the period 2021 to 2025 amounts to 1,421.  \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, the current stock of pacemaker replacement \nbatteries in our public health institutions is 37. Additionally, all public health institutions \ncarry out local purchase as and when required for emergency cases. \nMadam Speaker, as regard to the replacement of batteries, I am informed of the \nfollowing –  \n• the duration of pacemaker batteries is on average 8 to 10 years, and  \n• the appointment to patients with pacemakers is given on a frequency of six \nmonths to one year for review. \nMadam Speaker, let me briefly enumerate the problem faced by my Ministry regarding \nthe procurement of pacemakers. After floating of tenders for annual requirements for \nimplants for pacemaker for Cath Lab, Cardiac Unit, Victoria hospital, an evaluation was \ncarried out and IBL Ltd was selected. Notification prior to award in accordance with the \nprovisions of Public Procurement Act was issued to both successful bidder IBL Ltd bidder A \nand the unsuccessful bidders on 18 December 2025. \nSubsequently, a challenge was lodged by one unsuccessful bidder namely, MSJ Unicorn \nLtd on 23 December 2025. The case was referred to Independent Review Panel on 05 January \n2026. On 02 February 2026, IRP ruled that the bid from IBL was not responsive and directed \nmy Ministry to carry out a re-evaluation of the items by a new bid evaluation team. \nAccordingly, the new bid evaluation team submitted its report on 13 February 2026 and \nrecommended the award to MSJ Unicorn Ltd. Notifications were issued on 24 February \n2026, this time a challenge was lodged by IBL Ltd, the previous selected bidder. The matter \nwas subsequently resubmitted to IRP; the latter suspended all procurement procedures \npending hearing of the case. \nHowever, given the urgency of the procurement, the more so as the stock of cardiac \npacemakers were depleted, my Ministry had no alternative than to have recourse to a \nCertificate of Urgency issued on 17 March 2026 to waive the suspension of the procurement \nproceedings imposed by IRP in line with the provisions of PPA. Should the IRP rule in favour \nof the challenged, the bidder will be reimbursed the cost of participation in the bidding \nexercise.  Consequently, the letter of award was issued MSJ Unicorn Ltd on 24 March 2026 \nwith the first consignment expected to be delivered by 24 May 2026. Such situations \nhandicap the service delivery of health care services unnecessarily. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Ms Henriette-Manan, yes. \nMs Henriette-Manan: Is the hon. Minister aware that a patient from Rodrigues \nrequiring an urgent pacemaker battery replacement has been unable to access the necessary \ntreatment having been referred back at least six times since last year due to supposedly \nunavailability of the battery pending the completion of the procurement, the tender exercises. \nCan he propose what immediate measures that can be taken to ensure that such critical \nmedical interventions are not delayed henceforth? Thank you. \nMr Bachoo: This particular case from Rodrigues was referred to me by hon. François, \nif I am not mistaken. He has already related to me and the needful has been done. This is \nwhat information I have got. On two occasions he spoke to me on that issue. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. You have another question? Hon. Ms Henriette-Manan, you \nhave another question? Speak up, speak up! \nAn hon. Member: Stand up! \nMs Henriette-Manan: Yes. The family has approached me; it has not yet been done. \nHe is still waiting for it. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, just follow up. \nMr Bachoo: Well, I have not received any information if this the case. So, tomorrow \naround 1 pm, the parents can come to me in my office, I will look into it. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nMr Bachoo: Every day, I receive public. I have no problem to receive her or him. \nOkay? \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Are they in Mauritius?  \nMr Bachoo: Non, non in Mauritius. \nMadam Speaker: They are in Mauritius? The parents are in Mauritius. \nMr Bachoo: Okay, I will do it. \nMadam Speaker: Okay good. Now, the next question will be for hon. Etwareea! \nMIDDLE EAST CONFLICTS – MAURITIANS’ SAFETY – ASSISTANCE & \nSUPPORT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/355",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 355,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade",
      "question": "(No. B/355) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade whether, \nin regard to the recent escalation of conflict and prevailing tensions in the Middle East \nspilling over the neighbouring region, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of Mauritian nationals currently present thereat, indicating whether their \nsafety has been ascertained, and \n(b) \nnature of assistance requested therefrom, if any, and the support provided thereto.",
      "answer": "Mr Ramful: Madam Speaker, I will seek your indulgence, my reply will be quite long. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that in light of the ongoing conflict in the \nMiddle East affecting the entire region. My Ministry has been closely monitoring the \nsituation through our diplomatic missions particularly our Embassy in Riyadh and our \nConsulate in Dubai. Continuous coordination has been maintained with host countries and \nMauritian diaspora networks to ensure timely assistance and information sharing. \nMy Ministry has issued two alert notices since the start of the conflict namely on 28 \nFebruary and 09 March 2026 cautioning Mauritian nationals to refrain from travelling to the \nMiddle East and informing them of the hotline established at the level of the Ministry and our \nMissons in both Riyadh and Dubai.  \nAdditionally, we issued two press statements on 03 and 14 March 2026, respectively, \nexpressing concerns on the loss of lives, destruction of critical economic infrastructures and \nthe complete shutdown of air traffic. We also called for an immediate cessation of hostilities \nand the resumption of talks between the concerned parties for global peace and stability. \nMadam Speaker, as regards the number of Mauritian nationals currently present in the \naffected regions based on the latest information available from our embassy in Riyadh and \nconsulate in Dubai, there are several hundreds of Mauritian nationals residing across the gulf \nregion. \nIn the United Arab Emirates alone, more than 300 Mauritian nationals who were \ntemporarily stranded following the outbreak of the conflict of 28 February 2026 and the \nresulting flight disruptions, have since been assisted in returning safely to Mauritius through \ncommercial flights, notably those operated by Emirates. \nAdditionally, several hundreds of Mauritian nationals continue to reside and work in \nthe UAE mainly in Dubai and Abu Dhabi. According to official figures from the Ministry of \nForeign Affairs of the United Arabs Emirates, as of March 2026, there were approximately \n2148 Mauritians living in the UAE. \nThe current number of visitors from Mauritius in the UAE stand at 204. The number of \ndepartures of our nationals from the UAE to Mauritius, from 28 February 2026 to date is \n2299. \nOur embassy in Riyadh was contacted by Mauritian nationals from the following cities \nand countries – \n1. \nRiyadh – 58; \n2. \nJeddah – 38; \n3. \nMadina – 15; \n4. \nDammam Tabuk & Buraidah – 8; \n5. \nQatar – 89; \n6. \nBahrain – 20; \n7. \nKuwait – 7, and \n8. \nOman – 4 \nThrough the coordinated efforts of my Ministry and our diplomatic missions, contact \nhas been established with the vast majority of these nationals via direct outreach, diaspora \nnetworks and dedicated communications platforms. \nThe embassy in Riyadh has issued an advisory note, activated hotline services and \nmaintained active engagement through WhatsApp groups and other communication channels. \nMadam Speaker, at this stage, no confirmed report of harm to Mauritian nationals have \nbeen brought to the attention of the Ministry. Host countries, particularly the United Arab \nEmirates and the kingdom of Saudi Arabia have implemented precautionary measures to \nensure public safety including dissemination of safety alerts, promotion of remote working \narrangements and temporary closure of educational institutions. \nMadam Speaker, with respect to the nature of assistance requested, a limited number of \nMauritian nationals have sought support mainly in relation to consular guidance, travel \narrangements and precautionary advice. In some cases, our nationals, on holidays in the \nregion, expressed concerns regarding their safety and opted to return to Mauritius at their \nown expense. \n The Ministry, through its diplomatic missions, has responded promptly and effectively \nby facilitating the repatriation of Mauritian nationals including those stranded in the UAE \nthrough coordination with airlines and local authorities, establishing dedicated hotline \nnumbers and email channels to respond to consular queries and emergency requests, \nproviding real-time information and regular safety advisories to Mauritian nationals across \nthe regions, advising on precautionary measures and safe movement including evacuation \noptions where necessary, maintaining continuous communication with diaspora groups to \nmonitor their well-being and provide psychological and technical support where required, \nliaising with host governments including the Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs to facilitate \ntransit arrangements, notably enabling Mauritian nationals from the Gulf region to access \nconnecting flights from Jeddah to Mauritius where regular flights remained operational. \nIt is also worth noting that thanks to the personal intervention of the hon. Prime \nMinister with Senior Vice President of Emirates Airlines, Mauritius was amongst the first \ncountries to initiate repatriation assistance for its nationals following the escalation of the \nsituation on 28 February 2026. \nMadam Speaker, the government remains on high alert and fully mobilised. We are \nfirmly committed to safeguarding the interest, safety and well-being of Mauritian citizens \nabroad. Our diplomatic missions continue to monitor developments closely, maintain \nconstant communication with our nationals and stand ready to extend any further assistance \nas may be required including evacuation support should the situation so warrant. \nMauritian nationals in the Middle East regions are being continuously advised to \nremain vigilant, adhere to local authority guidance and stay in close contact with our \ndiplomatic missions. \nI wish to assure the House that the safety and well-being of Mauritian citizens abroad \nremain a top priority of his government. \nThank you.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much, hon. Minister. \nHon. Etwareea, are you okay? Yes, hon. A. Duval! \nMANUAL GRADE WORKERS – RECRUITMENT – TERMS & CONDITIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/356",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 356,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/356) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to recent recruitment of \nmanual grade workers, comprising scavengers, refuse collectors, general workers and handy \nworkers by the Municipal City Council of Port Louis, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain information as to the number thereof, indicating the – \n(a) \nterms and conditions of employment thereof, and \n(b) \nnumber thereof whose services were terminated on or about January/February \n2026.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, at the very outset, I wish to inform the House that \npursuant to section 4(1) for the Local Government Service Commission Act 1975, the power \nof appointment as well as removal from office in respect of employees of local authorities \nrests exclusively in Local Government Service Commission, that is, the LGSC. \nSection 4(2) of the same act further provides that the Commission shall not, in the \nexercise of its functions, be subject to the direction or control of any other person or \nauthority. \nHaving stated the above, I am informed by the LGSC that the recruitment exercise for \nthe Municipal City Council of Port Louis following advertisement released on 28 May 2025, \nis ongoing. \nMadam Speaker, all appointments in the workman cadre comprising scavenging, refuse \ncollectors, general workers and handy workers are made on a purely temporary day-to-day \nbasis in accordance with established procedures. \nThereafter, a year after joining service, the incumbent is appointed to the permanent \nand pensionable establishment, subject to a good performance, attendance, conduct and being \nmedically fit for duty. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to emphasise that these terms and conditions are clearly \ncommunicated to recruit prior to the assumption of duties and form part of the standard \nadministrative framework governing all such appointments. They are applied in a uniform, \ntransparent and consistent manner across all local authorities under the supervision of the \nLocal Government Service Commission. \nMadam Speaker, as regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that following the \njudgement of the Supreme Court delivered on 23 January 2026 to the effect that the \nrecruitment exercise of the employees of the workman cadre effected prior to November \n2024, was illegal and acting on the advice of the hon. Attorney General Office which took the \nview that the termination was legally in order, the services of the workers concerned were \nterminated. Termination letters were accordingly issued by the Chief Executive of all the \nlocal authorities including the Municipal City Council of Port Louis on 29 January 2026.  \nOut of the 164 employees who had been recruited in July and October 2024 for the \nMunicipal City Council of Port Louis, the services of 158 employees were terminated on 29 \nJanuary 2026. \nAs regards the remaining six employees, four had resigned, three were similarly \ndismissed and one passed away. Madam Speaker, it is important to underline that the \nappointments concerned were temporary in nature and the decision related to appointment \nand termination falls exclusively within the statutory remits of the LGSC. \nI am further informed that recruitment exercise for the other 11 local authorities has \nrecently been completed by the LGSC and appointments in the grade of workman class have \nalready been made thereto on the basis of vacancies reported to the LGSC by the Unified \nLocal Government Service Board of the Ministry of Local Government. \nAs regard to the Municipal City Council of Port Louis, the recruitment exercise \ninitiated following the advertisement of 28 May 2025 is as I have stated, still ongoing. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes! \nMr A. Duval: May I ask the hon. Minister to confirm that only, not more than 15% of \nthe employees who have been terminated, have been re-employed, be it at the Municipal City \nCouncil of Port Louis or in other District Councils –how is it that those recruitments which \nwas promised to be done… \nMadam Speaker: One question at a time. Let him confirm that first. \nMr A. Duval: Okay. Confirm that not more than 15%. \nMadam Speaker: 50%? \nMr A. Duval: 15% \nMadam Speaker: 15%? \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, recruitment exercise is conducted by the LGSC. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Woochit: In a very transparent and merit-based manner. All eligible candidates \nmust apply and will be considered in accordance to the prescribed procedures. So, the \nrecruitment rests on the LGSC itself. \nMadam Speaker: But can you confirm this 15%? \nMr Woochit: Not in local government. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, we know that. Can you confirm that 15% has been… \nMr Woochit: No, no, I cannot. \nMadam Speaker: You cannot? \nMr Woochit: No, because it depends on the LGSC. \nMadam Speaker: Second question! \nMr A. Duval: If he cannot confirm, I will ask him a second question. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr A. Duval: Is the hon. Minister aware that whilst it was promised that recruitment \nwill be done on the basis of transparency and meritocracy, that those persons who have \nworked for 16 months, who have contributed to the SICOM Pension Fund – who by the way \nhave not been reimbursed – and thus have had experience and a track record, have not been \nconsidered for recruitment again? \nMadam Speaker: But he will reply again… \nMr A. Duval: I will ask whether it is in line with his promise of meritocracy? Given \nthat they have a track record. According to the information I have, the vast majority has been \nleft out. \nMadam Speaker: No, but once… \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I have already replied to that question \nMadam Speaker: Yes!  \n(Interruptions) \nOne moment. \nMr A. Duval: I have a third; another question. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, but you cannot put a question when we know that we got an \nanswer already. \nMr A. Duval: But it is not the same. \nMadam Speaker: And then everybody knows. I do not want to get involved. \nMr A. Duval: Another one. It is not the same, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: But the question is…  \nMr A. Duval: Yes? \nMadam Speaker: The LGSC recruits, not the Ministry of Local Government. \nMr A. Duval: May I ask the hon. Minister whether he will see to it that the \ncontributions made by those persons to SICOM, namely to the tune of Rs1,084 per month for \n16 months – so, we are talking about Rs17,000-Rs18,000 – be reimbursed to those persons \nwho have been now left out of the job? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, that is okay. You can consider that, hon. Minister. \nHon. Minister, can you consider? \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I will have to get advice from the SLO. If it is fit and \nproper, I can consider. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, alright. But you can deal with the question.  \nMr Woochit: Yes. \nMadam Speaker: You will look into that question, okay? Next question! \nMs Savabaddy: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can I ask the hon. Minister if he can \nprovide to the Chamber the list of recruitment for all local governments? Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: You mean concerning the same? \nMs Savabaddy: Yes. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Can you provide it?  \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I can give the number, but not the list of the names. \nMadam Speaker: Exactly, yes! He can give the number. \nMs Savabaddy: At least for Constituency No. 4? Thank you. \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, with data protection, we cannot give the names. \nAccording to the Local Government Services Commission, we cannot give the names. \nMadam Speaker: Right. \nMr A. Duval: Madam Speaker, may I ask my last question? \nMadam Speaker: A last question! \nMr A. Duval: Thank you. Madam Speaker, there was an inter-ministerial committee set \nup to look into this issue. I will ask the hon. Minister whether he has taken note of the \nSupreme Court judgment, whereby it stated that it was abundantly clear that it was not \nthrough any fault of those employees, the fact that they were employed under un vice de \nprocedure. \nMadam Speaker: D’accord. \nMr A. Duval: The LGSC was being invited to consider those persons in the recruitment \nprocess. I will ask the hon. Minister whether he has taken note of same and whether he \nintends to do anything about it? \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, the issue was not one of the fault of the workers, but the \nlegality of the recruitment process. \nMadam Speaker: That’s it! \nMr Woochit: The decision was taken by the LGSC in compliance with the Supreme \nCourt judgment and legal advice, which confirmed that the appointments were invalid. \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: One moment! I do not want to give the answer, although I do have \nthe answer. People who are not appointed; maybe the hon. Attorney General can help?  \nMr A. Duval: No, it was decided by the inter-ministerial committee. \nMadam Speaker: No, but there is the law. There is the law, hon. A. Duval! You are a \nlawyer! Hon. Attorney General, can you help us? \nMr A. Duval: This question was being put publicly. \nMadam Speaker: Never mind! Let us go to another question. Later on, I will tell you \nthe answer. \nMr A. Duval: You do not have to tell me! There was the inter-ministerial committee. \nYou have seen the… \nMadam Speaker: Okay! \nNURSING STUDIES – SCHOLARSHIPS & TRAINING CAPACITY EXPANSION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/357",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 357,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research",
      "question": "(No. B/357) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research whether, in regard to nursing \nstudies, he will state whether consideration – \n(a) \nis being given for the provision of scholarships or other financial assistance \nschemes therefor coupled with bonds requiring beneficiaries thereof to serve in \nMauritius for specified periods, and  \n(b) \nwill be given, in the longer term, for the expansion of the national nursing \ntraining capacity beyond domestic requirements once local shortages are \nadequately addressed.",
      "answer": "Dr. Sukon: Madam Speaker, I thank hon. Dr. Prayag for this question. Let me begin \nwith an unvarnished truth. Mauritius has a nursing shortage. It is not a future problem. It is a \npresent one. Our hospitals feel it, our patients feel it and every nurse currently working \nbeyond one shift feels it most acutely.  \nMauritius is not alone. According to the World Health Organisation, it is estimated that \nthere will be a global shortfall of 6 million nurses by 2030. Every country in our region is \ncompeting for the same trained professionals. If Mauritius is not deliberate, generous and \nurgent in its response, we risk losing our own graduates to better paying destinations before \nthe ink is dry on their certificates.  \nBut here is what I want this august Assembly to understand: this Government is not \nmerely intending to act. This Government, especially through the Ministry of Health and \nWellness and my Ministry, is already acting. The frameworks are in place; the funding is in \nplace; the bonds are in place; the international partnerships are being forged, and enrolment in \nnursing programme is growing. \nLet me set out the facts, Madam Speaker. Financial support and service bonds are not \nmatters under consideration. They are matters already in operation. There are two main routes \nto becoming a registered nurse in Mauritius under the Nursing Council Act (2003) and both \nare backed by the full weight of public investment.  \nThe first route is through the Public Service Commission. Candidates are recruited \ndirectly as trainee nurses at the Central School of Nursing, under the Ministry of Health and \nWellness, where they undergo three years of fully funded theoretical and clinical training. \nThey also receive a monthly allowance throughout. Their training cost them nothing. Upon \nenlistment as trainee nurses, they enter into a bond to the effect that they will follow and \ncomplete the training course. After successful completion, registration with the Nursing \nCouncil and appointment as Nursing Officer, they are required to serve in a government \nhospital or health institution in Mauritius, Rodrigues or Agalega for a minimum of three \nyears. \nThe second route is through our public higher education institution under the Free \nTertiary Education Scheme. Students enrolled full time at Polytechnics Mauritius Ltd for the \nNational Diploma in Nursing or the Diploma in Mental Health Nursing and at the University \nof Technology Mauritius for the BSc (top-up) Nursing pay zero tuition fees. Education is \nfree. The State funds the tuition fees. \nMadam Speaker, beyond these public pathways, nursing education in Mauritius has \nmatured into a genuinely international credential offering. There are currently six accredited \nnursing programmes delivered in Mauritius through affiliations with Curtin University of \nAustralia, La Trobe University of Australia, Swansea University UK and University of \nSuffolk UK, covering both entry level, BSc, global programmes and top-up degrees for \npracticing registered nurses, seeking to elevate their qualifications. These are degrees \nawarded by internationally ranked universities, but earned on the Mauritian soil.  \nAccording to the Higher Education Commission, as at December 2025, enrolment \nacross public and private institutions stood at 206 students at UTM, 75 at PML and a further \n280 across private HEIs. A total nursing student population of 561 and growing. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question related to expanding training \ncapacity for regional and international demand, this Government, over and above meeting \ndomestic demand, is deliberately and systematically positioning Mauritius as a regional hub \nfor nursing and healthcare education. Our public and private institutions already have spare \ncapacity to absorb additional students.  \nUnder the Mauritius-Africa Scholarship Scheme, deserving residents of African Union \nand African Commonwealth Member States are already eligible for full scholarships to study \nnursing in Mauritius, not at some future date, but today, under the existing arrangement. My \nMinistry has launched the ambitious Study in Mauritius marketing campaign, currently \ntargeting African countries and shortly to be extended to Asia.  \nThree landmark international quality assurance agreements underpin our global \ncredibility and give international students the confidence that a Mauritian qualification will \nbe recognised beyond our shores. Our agreement with Quality Assurance Agency of UK, our \nagreement with HCERES of France and our agreement with University Grants Commission \nof India, recently signed, are the evidences. Together, these three agreements position \nMauritius as a serious internationally connected education jurisdiction, capable of attracting \nstudents, validating qualifications and comparing for enrolments with best destinations in our \nregion. \nMadam Speaker, the ambition is clear. The direction is set. A nursing sector that first \nserves Mauritius completely and then trains the region with distinction. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, Dr. Prayag, do you have any question? Okay, good.  \nNext question! Dr. Ms Daureeawo, yes! \nYOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT – RATE & EMPLOYABILITY ENHANCEMENT \nPROGRAMMES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/358",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 358,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/358) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to youth \nunemployment, he will – \n(a) \nstate the current rate thereof gender-wise, region-wise and by educational level, \nand  \n(b) \noutline the programmes being implemented to promote employment opportunities \nfor young graduates.",
      "answer": "Mr Uteem: Madam Speaker, according to Statistics Mauritius, as at December 2025, \nthe rate of unemployment among youths, that is, aged between 16 and 24 years, was 16.8%, \nrepresenting 10,800 unemployed youths, comprising 5,000 men and 5,800 women. The \nemployment rate among the youth is more than three times the rate of employment for the \nsame period, which stands at 5.4%.  \nThe National Employment Department of my Ministry also registers interested job \nseekers, including youths through their 13 Employment Information Centres across the \nisland. At the level of the NED, the definition of “youth” covers job seekers aged between 16 \nand 35 years. As at 30 March 2026, there are a total of 14,509 registered young job seekers, \nout of which 5,954 youths were unemployed, comprising 3,738 women and 2,216 men. The \nremaining 8,555 – it is more than half – registered job seekers, actually, they were in \nemployment, but looking for better job opportunities. \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that Statistics Mauritius does not produce the youth \nunemployment rate region-wise, given the relatively low number of households surveyed for \nContinuous Multi-Purpose Household Survey. However, I am tabling the information relating \nto the number of youth job seekers registered at the 12 Employment Information Centres \ndistrict-wise. \nAs regards the education level, according to Statistics Mauritius, out of the 10,800 \nunemployed youths, some 2,900, representing 27%, possess qualifications below School \nCertificate level – that is Statistics Mauritius. However, according to information gathered \nfrom the 13 Employment Information Centres as regard to young job seekers registered at \nthese centres, the percentage of unemployed job seekers that failed at PSAC level or CPE is \n15%, 44% have attained up to Form 4, 22% have reached School Certificate level, 11% have \ncompleted HSC, and 8% were graduates. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, youth unemployment among \ngraduates remains a pressing challenge in Mauritius. To address this issue, several \nemployability enhancement programmes are being implemented by my Ministry to promote \nemployment opportunities for young graduates, namely – \n(i) \nYouth Employment Programme \nThe Youth Employment Programme provides for up to two years of placement in \npublic or private sector and a stipend. For the period 2015 to 2026, 6,320 young graduates, \nincluding 2,533 men and 3,787 women have benefited from this programme, out of which \n60% have secured a permanent employment in the private sector after completion of the \nprogramme. \nHowever, Madam Speaker, the Youth Employment Programme is currently open only \nfor those holding HSC and above, which represents only 19% of the number of young job \nseekers, thus depriving those having lower qualifications from having an opportunity to join \nthe programme. \nMy Ministry is, therefore, looking into the possibility, with the assistance of the \nMinistry of Finance, to extend the programme to all registered young job seekers, irrespective \nof their qualifications, to facilitate their integration into the labour market. \nIn addition, the stipend payable in the public sector, today, varies between Rs6,000 to \nRs12,000. Whereas in the private sector, it is between Rs8,000 to Rs15,000, and the private \nsector contributes another Rs8,000, another Rs10,000, another Rs15,000 to degree holders. \nSo, today, there is a difference in the YEP as far as the stipend is concerned, and as a result, a \nnumber of youths are not joining the programme for the public sector because they get only \nbetween Rs6,000 for HSC holders and up to Rs12,000 for postgraduate holders. \n(ii) \nTrainee Engineer Scheme \nThe other scheme is the Trainee Engineer Scheme. From October 2016 to March 2026, \n1,069 placements were made across the public and private sector under the scheme. Despite \nprovision for Rs35 million in the present budget, placement of youths holding degrees in \nchemical, \nmechatronics, \nrobotics, \nelectronics, \ncommunication, \ntelecommunication, \naeronautical, industrial and computer engineering has been challenging due to a dearth of \nsupervisor to oversee their two years training. So, we have the money, we have the graduates, \nbut we do not have supervisors to look after those potential engineers. So, my Ministry has \nmade a request with the employers’ organisation for their collaboration to ensure the \nplacement of these graduates. \n(iii) \nReskilling and upskilling of job seekers \nTo address reskilling and training needs of unemployed job seekers, including young \ngraduates, we are providing training to young unemployed in digital proficiency course, \naging and managing disability, smart agri-business and pastry making so as to open up their \ncareer avenues. To date, 35 youths are enrolled in these courses. \nTo promote employment opportunities, since early 2025, my Ministry has already \norganised four regional job and training fairs in different parts of the island, resulting in the \nemployment of 278 job seekers, including young graduates. The next job fair is scheduled in \nthe western region later this month. \n(iv) Nou Travay Nou Lavenir Programme \nAnother initiative to enhance employment of youth graduates is through Nou Travay \nNou Lavenir Programme, broadcasted on the MBC TV and radio, which was launched earlier \nthis year, in February, to inform the public on labour trends and vacancies.  \nAn innovative component has been included in the form of a QR Code at the end of the \nprogramme which can be scanned by viewers to link them to Mauritius.com platform where \nthey can apply for the advertised jobs. \nIn addition, Madam Speaker, there is a range of activities organised at Employment \nInformation Centres to further support job seekers including young graduates. These includes \norganising, job dating, how to draft curriculum vitae, interviews, how to conduct interviews \nand also career guidance sessions. \nMadam Speaker, over and above these measures, my Ministry is in the process of \nacquiring a new software with an automatic matching mechanism with AI to increase \nefficiency in job matching. My Ministry has, through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, \nRegional Integration and International Trade, sought technical assistance from France and \nIndia for the implementation of that project of job matching using AI technology. At the level \nof my Ministry, we also intend to reinforce collaboration with the Career Guidance Services \nat the Ministry of Education and Human Resource so that school leavers intending to pursue \nundergraduate studies, avoid saturated fields of studies and are geared toward emerging \nsectors. \nFinally, Madam Speaker, the time has come to revalorise certain professions and my \nMinistry is working with training institutions to address the issue of skills mismatch to meet \nthe demand of the evolving labour market. Enhanced labour market intelligence and \nforecasting will also help anticipate future skills requirement and guide policy decision. In the \nsame vein, we are embarking on the implementation of a labour market information system \nwhich is the first step towards the setting up of a labour market observatory with the \ncollaboration of the SADC and the International Labour Organisation to enable better \nmobility of workers at regional level.  \nThe above-mentioned measures will ensure that our young people, including young \ngraduates are not just employed but meaningfully engaged in building a bright future for the \nbenefit of the population and the country at large. Thank you. \n Madam Speaker: Excuse me, I don’t know if I am the only one who feels very warm. \nEverybody is feeling warm. I have already asked for… \nAn hon. Member: Save energy! \nMadam Speaker: Yes, maybe. I don’t know. Let’s hope so. \nI am sorry. Dr. Daureeawo, do you have a question? \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: I have two questions, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, of course! \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: So, could the hon. Minister state what targeted measures are being \nimplemented to address the imbalance of higher unemployment rate among young women? \nMr Uteem: This is a real concern and in fact, my Ministry has been working with the \nMinistry of Gender and also with employers’ group like Business Mauritius and very often, \nthe answer we got is that there are certain issues with certain types employment which are \nmore geared towards men whereas in fact, there is a greater number of qualified women, we \ncan see it from the result of the HSC, SC or even Undergraduate. The other explanation that \nwas given to me is that after being pregnant and after maternity, some of the women do not \nwant to come back to work or find it more difficult to resume work and have to choose to \nleave their baby behind but we are very conscious about this problem and we are working \nwith the Ministry of Gender and the workers’ organisation to ensure that there is no \ndiscrimination on recruitment against women graduates. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: My second question – can the hon. Minister clarify whether there \nare significant disparities between urban and rural areas and how is the Government \naddressing this? \nMr Uteem: In terms of unemployment, no. When you look at the list that I have tabled, \nit’s quite evenly balanced. It is evenly distributed but I have to specify something, Madam \nSpeaker. More than half of the young people who register themselves are already employed \nand most of them, I don’t know why, they have an obsession of being employed in \nGovernment or in Local Government.  \nSo, there are a lot of jobs available in the private sector, that is why we are having to \nhave recourse to foreign workers because there are jobs available in the private sector but \nthere is unfortunately a tendency for, not just young graduates but generally, for certain job \nseekers to prefer to go and work in Government Services and Local Government Services. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, one more? Yes! \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: And what measures are in place to evaluate the effectiveness of \nthe programmes, the schemes, YEP, the engineers? \nMadam Speaker: All the programmes? \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: All the programmes? \nMr Uteem: Yes, I mean as I mentioned, this is something that ought to have been done \nyears ago because these programmes had existed, for example, YEP, I just gave you the \nanswer. It’s not working and we are now going to try to extend it not just for people with \nHSC qualification and above but also those who don’t have the qualification. Similarly for \nthe training of engineers, we are going to work with the training organisation to see how we \ncan facilitate the training of those graduates. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Dr. Aumeer! \nPHARMACY BOARD – MR B. N. & MR D. J. – APPOINTMENT – HEALTH \nSUPPLEMENTS IMPORTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/359",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 359,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/359) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Pharmacy \nBoard, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a)  whether Mr B. N. has been appointed Registrar thereof and Mr D. J. has been \nappointed Secretary of the Health Committee thereof and, if so, when, and  \n(b)  it has authorised the importation of health supplements containing cannabis and \nmorphine derivatives, and if so, when and whether the views of the State Law \nOffice were sought and obtained prior thereto.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, the Pharmacy Board is set up in accordance with Section \n3 of the Pharmacy Act, inter-alia, to exercise control over the manufacture, importation, \ndistribution, sale and possession of any drug, poison, dangerous drug and psychotropic \nsubstance. The Pharmacy Board comprises – \n(a)  the Chief Medical Officer (now Director General Health Services), as \nChairperson;  \n(b)  the Chief Government Pharmacist (now Director Pharmaceutical Services); \n(c)  5 pharmacists appointed by the Minister, and \n(d)  a law officer designated by the Attorney-General. \nThe Act also provides for the Minister of Health to designate a Government Pharmacist \nto act as Registrar of the Board. \nOn the other hand, the Health Supplements Committee is an ad-hoc committee set up at \nthe level of the Ministry to examine requests for import of health supplements. It comprises \nthe Director of Pharmaceutical Services as Chairperson, one Pharmacist from the Public \nSector, three pharmacists from the Private Sector, the Chief Nutritionist and the \nDirector/Deputy Director of Public Health and Food Safety Unit. A Government Pharmacist \nis designated to act as Secretary to the Committee.   \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, Mr B.N. has been appointed as the Registrar of \nthe Pharmacy Board as from 03 March 2026. It is worth pointing out that there was a backlog \nfor registration of some 450 new pharmaceutical products. This was unacceptable as there \nwas a chronic shortage of pharmaceutical products both in the public and private sectors, thus \npreventing delivery of appropriate healthcare services.  There were also several grievances \nfrom various stakeholders regarding registration of products and issue of licences for the \noperation of new pharmacies, among others. \nTo remedy the situation, Mr B.N. was appointed as Registrar of the Pharmacy Board in \nview of his experience and capacity in dealing with such matters. Since his appointment, the \nnew Registrar has already completed the procedure for the registration of some 60 products \nby the Pharmacy Board and has planned to complete the registration of the remaining \nproducts within a time frame of three months.  \nMadam Speaker, as regards Health Supplements, which are similar to dietary \nsupplements, they are not regulated under any legislation. However, they are assessed \nadministratively by the Health Supplements Committee. Any prospective importer is required \nto submit the Good Manufacturing Practice Certificates or equivalent documents, Free Sale \nCertificates and Certificates of Analysis. These documents are scrutinised by the Health \nSupplement Committee before authorisation for import and marketing are granted. The \nauthorisation is valid for one year and may be renewed following assessment of any \nmodification of the product. \nUpon arrival of the consignment to Mauritius, the importer had to submit the invoice to \nthe Pharmacy Department of my Ministry. This invoice is examined by a team of pharmacists \nwho authorise the release of the product. The consignment is then subjected to a further \nvisual verification by another pharmacist posted at the port or airport in the presence of \nCustoms and ADSU officers, prior to final release. However, if there is any suspicion that the \nproducts may contain prohibited substances, the Customs Department is mandated to detain \nthe products and send them for analysis.   \nI am informed that products containing cannabis and its derivatives are strictly \nprohibited in Mauritius, except medicinal cannabis. However, morphine and its derivatives, \nalso listed in Schedule II of the Dangerous Drugs Act, are used at hospital level and in private \nclinics under strict medical surveillance. Such products are registered by the Pharmacy Board \nand are given special permit for importation by the Pharmacy Board. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that no \nauthorisation for importation of health supplements containing cannabis and morphine \nderivatives have been given either by the Pharmacy Board or the Health Supplement \nCommittee since the appointment of Mr B.N. and Mr D.J. \nHowever, I am informed that on 28 January 2026, clearance by the Pharmacy Division \nof my Ministry for importation of a consignment of homeopathic products, subject to final \nauthorisation by the Customs Department. I am also informed that some products from the \nconsignment have been detained by the Customs as they were suspected of containing \ncannabis or morphine. The incriminated products have been sent for further analysis to the \nForensic Science Laboratory. Appropriate action will be taken in the light of the result of the \nanalysis, including seeking advice from the Attorney General’s Office. \nMadam Speaker, a distinction should be made between health supplements and \nhomeopathic preparations. Homeopathic preparations are very diluted preparations that are \nnot regulated worldwide except for presence of heavy metals.  \nIn fact, homeopathic preparations are made using extreme dilution to the point where \nthe original substance is present only in minute or non-detectable quantities. At such levels, \nthey do not have any drug-like narcotic effect, they cannot cause dependence or misuse, and \nthe original substance cannot be recovered in any meaningful amount. \n Madam Speaker, even though the preparations are not regulated, my Ministry still \napplies quality assurance checks before allowing their importation. Any prospective importer \nhas to submit the following documents – \n• \nA letter of authorisation from the prescribing doctor; \n• \nThe reason for the authorisation; \n• \nA written undertaking that the products were not for resale; \n• \nGood Manufacturing Practice Certificate of its requirement; \n• \nA licence to manufacture homeopathic products issued by the drugs licensing \nauthority for the manufacturer of the exporting country; \n• \nA Free Sale Certificate; \n• \nA Certificate of Analysis; \n• \nCertificate of Compliance for the invoice on the manufacturer. \nThese measures that even products outside the scope of Dangerous Drugs Act meet \nacceptable safety and quality standards.  \nMadam Speaker, my Ministry is also working on the Medical and Health Products Bill \nwhich will cater for regulation of all medicines, health supplements as well as homeopathic \nproducts, medical devices, in-vitro diagnosis, cosmetics, complementary medicines, blood \nand blood products alongside existing laws relating to regulation of the products. \nI am informed that a first draft of the bill which has been prepared by a consultant is \nbeing reviewed in consultation with the Attorney General’s Office.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Minister confirm whether his \nMinistry has sought information from the Financial Crimes Services in regard to Mr B.N. and \nMr D.J. who were interrogated and investigated in the Molnupiravir case, and are now today, \ndespite having the vast and massive experience that we have heard, holding sensitive \npositions at the Pharmacy Board and at the Health Commission Board? \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, this is a fact that these two gentlemen were detained in \nthe previous government on charges, but the court has cleared one. The agency withdrew the \ncase for one of them, and the second was cleared by the court. They have not seen any \nincriminating case against him. So, all of us know that you are innocent unless you are \nproven guilty.  \nIf I am going to listen to his line of reasoning, even in this very House, we have friends, \nincluding me, I was charged with all types of immoral, unethical and illegal cases. So was our \nhon. Prime Minister! And another gentleman sitting by my side! If I am going to believe in \nthis, it means that all of us are accused then! I do not have the right to be in this House! But \nthe common sense says that so long as you have not been proved guilty by a court of law, you \nare innocent. \nWhy should I deprive these two gentlemen of their rights when the big bosses are \nmoving up and down the streets, and nothing has happened to them? They were mere \npharmacists and they got cleared; one by the court and another one by the very agency which \nwanted to bring him down. So, my duty, unless and until they proven guilty, they are bound \nto work in my Ministry. I do not have any problem with that. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, hon. Minister. Yes! \nDr. Aumeer: I have listened to the defensive attitude of the hon. Minister with regard… \nMr Bachoo: What defensive? It is the truth! I am speaking the truth! That was the \ntruth. \nDr. Aumeer: But the point is… \nMadam Speaker: That was not… \nDr. Aumeer: My question is: Did his Ministry ensure that the FCC is either no longer \ninvestigating on these two gentlemen or is there still an investigation being carried out? \nNonetheless, these two people can act at different levels, but not at a sensitive position where \nthey were involved heavily – and I repeat–, heavily in the Molnupiravir case. \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, it is as simple as that: so long as they have not been \ncharged! Again, tomorrow, there can be a case against A, B, C, D or anybody in my Ministry, \nof course, actions will be taken. But the very fact that these gentlemen have suffered so much, \nas far back as 2023, they were cleared, and after two years, after getting clearance from the \nState Law Office, then we have taken them back. In my Ministry, I need pharmacists and I \nneed people because there is a lack. There is a shortage. \nJust imagine, 450 products were still pending in order to be registered. I have plenty of \nproblems. Too much of problems. I could not have waited. But one thing is clear: they have \nbeen proven innocent. They are innocent. If tomorrow, cases are lodged against them, I will \nnot have any other alternative than to kick them out of the Ministry. That is all I can say! \nMadam Speaker: No. The question, it seems to me, was whether the FCC is still \ninquiring? So, if I get you right, they are not? \nMr Bachoo: Well, I am not aware of this. \nMadam Speaker: You are not aware? \nMr Bachoo: Because I do not have any contact with the FCC.  \nThe only contact I have is with the State Law Office because we have written to them \nand they have clearly maintained that we can take them back. I am aware, as far as \nMolnupiravir is concerned, the investigation is going on and there are big bosses who are \ninvolved in that. Let the FCC do its work. If they find that these two gentlemen, in one way \nor another, have to be incriminated, they have done any wrong, then, of course, the law will \nfollow its course. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! \nDr. Aumeer: One last question. \nMadam Speaker: One last question! \nDr. Aumeer: In a different context, in the light of Government’s commitment to \ncombat drug abuse, what urgent measures his Ministry has taken to implement to ensure that \npara-pharmaceutical and homeopathic products are systematically tested to prevent any \nbackdoor entry of narcotic or synthetic substances irrespective of the minute amount that we \nmay have, considering that we have a Dangerous Drugs Act in Mauritius? \nMr Bachoo: I repeat it over again: I have mentioned that though these medicines are \ncoming to Mauritius, they do not need any extra certificates. I have mentioned a series of \ndecision that we have taken to ensure that everything is done in the perfect way. At the same \ntime, I have also mentioned that we have just passed the Optical Council Bill. After that, we \nare having the Medical Council. Thirdly, the Medical and Health Products Bill is coming, \nwhich will cater for regulations of all medicines, health supplements as well as homeopathic \nproducts, medical devices, in-vitro diagnostic, cosmetics, everything.  \nAll these things would be taken care of.  I can assure the hon. Member that I am really \nconcerned about it. I will see to it that not a single, a minute mistake be committed as far as \nthe importation of these supplements are concerned. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nHon. Ramdass! I am looking here, but you are here! \nVIEUX GRAND PORT - LA TOUR DES HOLLANDAIS – INAUGURATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/360",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 360,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/360) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the project for the inauguration \nand opening of the La Tour des Hollandais at Vieux Grand Port, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Gondeea: Madam Speaker, in regard to the project at La Tour des Hollandais \nlocated at Vieux Grand Port, I am informed by the National Heritage Fund, which operates \nunder the aegis of Ministry, that this National Heritage building was restored and renovated \nin October 2020. \nHowever, since then, the building has remained closed to the public. I am further \ninformed that following its restoration, the site was subject to misuse and acts of vandalism. \nHowever, instead of implementing appropriate management and security measures to ensure \nits proper utilisation and valorisation, the previous government opted to restrict access to the \npublic.  \nAs a result of the prolonged closure of the site and the absence of regular maintenance \nduring that period, the building has progressively fallen into a state of neglect. Madam \nSpeaker, I am further informed that recent technical assessments carried out by the NHF have \nrevealed a number of maintenance issues affecting the structure, including the development \nof a rust hole on the roof as a result of prolonged exposure to weathering.  \nThis has led to vegetation growth within the tower causing potential safety risk \nconcerns. Consequently, it has been deemed necessary to keep the site closed pending \nremedial works. The services of an engineer have been enlisted to look into the matter and \npropose remedial works. \nMadam Speaker, it is to be noted that in the past while investments were made in the \nrestoration of certain heritage infrastructure, there was a clear lack of strategic vision \nregarding their post restoration management, valorisation and integration into a broader \ncultural and tourism framework. \nAs a result, facilities such as La Tour des Hollandais remained underutilised after \nrenovation which is with no public access. This situation not only undermined the intended \npurpose of such investments but also deprived both Mauritians and visitors to the opportunity \nto fully appreciate our rich historical heritage. \nMadam Speaker, this Government is now adopting a new and forward-looking \napproach by placing heritage as a key pillar of cultural tourism and sustainable development. \nAs part of this approach, La Tour des Hollandais could be considered as potential site under \nthe Heritage Stewardship Scheme. Once this scheme is finalised, whereby a partner could be \nengaged to ensure its regular opening to the public, proper upkeep and its valorisation for \ncultural educational and tourism-oriented activities. \nMadam Speaker, these measures will ensure that heritage infrastructure is no longer left \ndormant but is actively preserved, managed and utilised as a driver of economic activity, \ncommunity engagement and enhance cultural visibility in line with the objectives of the \nGovernment Programme 2025/2029. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Ramdass! \nMr Ramdass: Thank you, Madam Speaker. As rightly pointed out by the hon. \nMinister, we are here talking of a National Heritage Building, a potential place of attraction \nfor tourists. \nMadam Speaker: I do not hear you. \nMr Ramdass: A potential place of attraction for tourists… \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Ramdass: … seeking to learn about the history of Mauritius. May we have a \ntimeline or rather the opening, thereof, by the hon. Minister? \nMadam Speaker: Short please, hon. Minister. \nMr Gondeea: As soon as we Stewardship Award Scheme is ready, we will go forward \nto open the space you are looking for. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Hon. Lobine! \nINDIA-MAURITIUS DOUBLE TAXATION AVOIDANCE AGREEMENT – \nMAURITIAN GLOBAL BUSINESS SECTOR – IMPACT ASSESSMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/361",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 361,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/361) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the Mauritian \nGlobal Business Sector, she will state whether her Ministry has conducted a thorough and \ndetailed assessment of the impact of the recent judgment of the Supreme Court of India in the \ncase of Tiger Global International II Holdings vs. The Authority for Advance Rulings \nthereon, particularly concerning the future eligibility of Mauritius-resident entities for capital \ngains tax exemptions under the India-Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ms Jeetun: Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Member for this very pertinent \nquestion.  \nMadam Speaker, the Supreme Court of India has on 15 January 2026 in the case of \nTiger Global International Holdings vs. The Authority for Advance Rulings issued a ruling \nwhich had cast doubt scope on the grandfathering of investments made before 01 April 2017 \nand negotiated during the protocol amending the India Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance \nAgreement in 2016. This has caused much concern across the financial services sector which, \nas the House is aware, is the first pillar of the Mauritian economy.  \nMadam Speaker, following the entry into force of the protocol of the 2016, amending \nthe India-Mauritius DTA, the right to tax capital gains arising from sales of shares held in the \nIndian company by an investor who is a tax resident in Mauritius was as follows – \n• \nshared acquired before 31 March 2017 were fully grandfathered and would be \ntaxed in Mauritius; \n• \nshares acquired as from 01 April 2017, if sold before 31 March 2019, 50% would \nbe taxed in India, and \n• \nany shares acquired after 31 March 2019 may be taxed solely by India. \nMadam Speaker, the ruling unsettled one of the most fundamental assurances given to \nforeign investors in India, therefore, exposing bona fide established structures to the risk of \nbeing subjected to the application of the general Anti-Avoidance rules under the Chapter 10A \nof the India Income Tax Rule 1962. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to inform the House that following the Supreme Court ruling, \nthis Government initiated immediately a series of high-level initiatives to find appropriate \nsolutions. The Cabinet was apprised on the following day, on 16 January 2026, and I chaired \na meeting which was attended by the Governor of the Central Bank, the Chief Executive of \nthe Financial Services Commission, the representatives of Ministry of Finance, Mauritius \nRevenue Authority, Mauritius Finance and Financial Services Professionals from the industry \nto assess the impact of the judgement on the global business sector. \nDuring the meeting with the members, it was agreed that in the aftermath of the \nSupreme Court Judgement, the Mauritius IFC was confronted with two main challenges –  \n1. \nHow to ascertain that the existing transactions made before 01 April 2017 which \nwere grandfathered under the protocol of 2016 remained protected, and  \n2. \nhow to ascertain that entities which are resident in Mauritius demonstrates \nsufficient substance to be eligible for exemptions under India-Mauritius DTA. \nMadam Speaker, in February 2026, the hon. Prime Minister, Dr. Navinchandra \nRamgoolam, directly raised the issue with the Prime Minister of India, Shri Narendra Modi, \nreaffirming the strength of the strategic partnership between the two countries. \nDuring a bilateral meeting with the Indian Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi, he \ndiscussed the India-Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, Prime Minister, Shri \nNarendra Modi, assured of the continued stance of India of not taking any action that would \nundermine the existing economic benefits that Mauritius currently enjoys under the DTA. \nIn parallel, during a mission in February in India, I met with Mr Ravi Agarwal, the \nchairman of the CBDT, and Mr Arvind Shrivastava, Secretary of the Department of Revenue, \nto share the concerns of the industry and our government following the Tiger Global case. \nMadam Speaker, as the House may be aware, within weeks of those discussions held \nwith the Indian authorities on 31 March 2026, the Central Board of Direct Taxes of India \nmoved to correct this position for the Rule 128 of the Income Tax Amendment Rules 2026 \nwhich has been gazetted to restore in explicit legislative terms, the grandfathering protection \nthat the court has effectively diluted. It is noted that the concerns were well received by the \nIndian authorities demonstrating that they are attentive to our requests.  Madam Speaker, this \nis clear evidence of the success of the economic diplomacy taken at the highest level by the \nhon. Prime Minister with the Indian Prime Minister. \nThis measure, first, reaffirms the grandfathering protection established by the 2016 \nprotocol amending the DTA between India and Mauritius, paving the way for a revival of \nconfidence among foreign investors regarding Mauritius. Hence, as from the 01 April 2026, \ninternational investors can rest assured that the transfer of investment made before 01 April \n2017 will remit exempt from GAAR. \nMadam Speaker, in so far as the future structures are concerned, in order to ensure that \nour operators continue to benefit from the remaining incentives under the DTA, works are \ncurrently being underway to consider reviewing the conditions for issuance of Tax Residence \nCertificate in order to provide the necessary comfort to the Indian authorities. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Lobine first. \nMr Lobine: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister, with regard to \nthe Financial Services Commission, have they conducted any impact assessment on any \npotential capital outflows or restructuring of the global business entities following this \njudgement? \nDr. Ms Jeetun: I did ask that question, Madam Speaker, and there were no major \noutflows or companies leaving the Mauritian jurisdiction and that is why we acted very \nswiftly and quickly and quite aggressively at various levels to get this sorted out. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, second. \nMr Lobine: Is the Minister in a position to provide data with regard to whether there \nhas been any recent decline in India-focused investment flows routed through Mauritius since \nthis ruling? \nDr. Ms Jeetun: I can say that in general, since the 2016 protocol was amended, there \nhad been a decline and Mauritius as it is widely known, lost its place as the first FDI driver to \nIndia. And Singapore and US were sort of first, second and Mauritius is sort of back as \nsecond position. I am not aware of major outflows but I can certainly ask FSC to provide data \nregarding the post-Tiger Global judgment but when I asked that question, the answer was \nthere has not been major outflows. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, hon. Rookny! \nMr Rookny: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Has the Ministry specifically engaged with \nthe Financial Services Commission and the Economic Development Board to quantify the \nnumber of global business licence entities currently exposed to the enhanced scrutiny under \nIndia’s GAR Framework following this judgment? \nDr. Ms Jeetun: I can certainly ask the question. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, second? \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, does the hon. Minister accept that given Mauritius’ long-\nstanding role as the preferred gateway for FDI into India through its global business sector, \nthis judgment represents a structural threat to that positioning and if so, what is the \nGovernment’s contingency plan? \nDr. Ms Jeetun: As I said in my answer, Madam Speaker, it did raise a lot of concern \nafter the judgment came but the initiative taken by this Government and the rule that was \npublished in the Government Gazette of India has secured our investments that were made \nprior to 01 April 2017. As regards the future ones, as I said, we are working – the Ministry, \nthe MRA, the AG’s office – to see how we can ensure that we can reassure the Indian \nauthorities regarding substance requirements. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nMr Rookny: Madam Speaker, allow me rephrase it. What I meant was if the India \nroute is a dying route, what will be our contingency plan to keep the global business sector \nalive? \nDr. Ms Jeetun: Madam Speaker, I can reassure the hon. Member that India route is not \na dying route. As I said, we were first and then we sort of became third. Now we are back to \nthe second place. So, it is of course a very competitive environment and that is why we have \nto be kept on our toes all the time but it is definitely not a dying route. What the Ministry is \ndoing is that we have to keep on consolidating the India market but we as a sector, we have to \nalso diversify. That is why we are working on an Africa strategy and that is why more and \nmore focus is also going into diversifying our markets into Africa. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, one more. \nMr Lobine: Yes, thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Maybe one last. \nMr Lobine: One last, yes. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Lobine: May I ask the hon. Minister, are there immediate plans to re-negotiate or \nfurther clarify provisions of this treaty with India to safeguard our jurisdiction after this \njudgment? \nDr. Ms Jeetun: Madam Speaker, that is a good intention to have. We have been trying \nto negotiate that for a long time but I understand that the Indian side – I myself have met \nthem at least twice since last year – they cannot bring Mauritius different from other \ncountries because they have relationship with so many other countries. So, on multilateral \nbasis, they cannot do that. We will have to compete on an international level but I am \nreassured that in Mauritius, we are doing what needs to be done as a sector from a \ngovernment and regulatory point of view but also as an industry that we can promote, grow \nand maintain our Indian market as strong as possible. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, alright. Now, the next one is going to be replied by the hon. \nMinister of Local Government. Dr. Ms Daureeawo! \nDRAINS, RIVERS & CANALS – ILLEGAL DUMPING – MEASURES \nIMPLEMENTED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/362",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 362,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/362) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change \nwhether, in regard to illegal dumping in drains, rivers and canals and the contribution thereof \nto flooding, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the – \n(i) \nnumber of reported cases thereof over the past two years and number of \nprosecutions initiated in connection therewith, and  \n(ii) \nmeasures implemented in known illegal dumping hotspots, and  \n(b) \nstate whether consideration is being given for the strengthening of the existing \nlegislation in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "The Minister of Local Government (Mr R. Woochit): Madam Speaker, with your \npermission, I shall reply to PQ B/362. \nMadam Speaker, local authorities carry out the cleaning drains and the desilting of \nrivers and canals on a continuous basis. These operations are conducted in close collaboration \nwith the Land Drainage Authority which identifies priority areas annually. In addition, regular \nsite inspections are undertaken within their respective jurisdiction to monitor the condition of \nwaterways and to ensure timely intervention where required.  \nHowever, Madam Speaker, illegal dumping by certain members of the public remains a \nsignificant contributing factor to the obstruction of waterways and resulting flooding risks as \nthe hon. Member said. With regard to part (a)(i) of the question, I am advised that over the \npast two years, a total of 525 cases of illegal dumping in drains, rivers and canals have been \nreported to local authorities, the Police de l’Environnement and the Environment and Climate \nChange Division. A detailed breakdown of these cases, including actions taken, fines issued \nand nuisance abatement is being tabled for the benefit of the House. Out of these cases – \n• \n14 cases resulted in fines being paid; \n• \n96 cases led to nuisance abatement, and \n• \n3 cases are currently under enquiry. \nMadam Speaker, prosecution in such matters remain challenging as these offences are \noften committed at odd hours and in many instances without direct evidence or identified \noffenders. Nevertheless, enforcement action continues wherever sufficient evidence is \navailable, particularly through the issuance of fixed penalty notices and follow-up \nintervention by the Police de l’Environnement. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a)(ii), the local authorities, the Police de \nl’Environnement and other relevant agencies have adopted a coordinated and proactive \napproach, particularly in known illegal dumping hotspots. All these measures include – \n(i) \nidentified monitoring and surveillance in vulnerable areas; \n(ii) \nregular cleanup and desilting operations; \n(iii) installation of appropriate signage in dumping prone locations; \n(iv) strengthened enforcement by the Police de l’Environnement and Police Division; \n(v) \ndeployment of the Emergency Response Service (ERS) and Divisional Support \nUnit (DSU) to monitor and intercept suspicious activities; \n(vi) restrengthening neighbourhood watch groups; \n(vii) public awareness and sensitisation campaigns; \n(viii) sensitisation of land owners on their legal responsibilities; \n(ix) public education on the provisions of the Environment Act 2024. \nThese measures are ongoing and are continuously reinforced. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that \na robust legal framework is already in place to address illegal dumping. Under the Local \nGovernment Act 2011, notably section 61(11), it is an offence to deposit waste, including \nbuilder’s rubble, vehicle wreck and other materials in drains, rivers, canals or public places. \nFurthermore, the Environment Act 2024 provides for additional enforcement mechanisms \nincluding – \n• \neye sore abatement notices with intrigant penalties; \n• \nfixed penalty notices currently set at Rs25,000;  \n• \nenhanced action for dumping in environmentally sensitive areas, and \n• \na strict penalty for offenses in coastal and maritime zone. \nA document outlining these legal provisions is being tabled for the benefit of the hon. \nMember. \nMadam Speaker, Government is also actively considering further measures to \nstrengthen the existing legislative framework. For the Financial Year 2026-2027, proposals \nhave been submitted to review and increase fixed penalties including the doubling of certain \nfines.  \nMeasures are under consideration to harmonise and enhance penalties for littering and \nillegal dumping, and the introduction of community service as sanction for repeat offenders is \nbeing examined, in consultation with the Attorney General’s Office. \nMadam Speaker, I am also chairing regular coordination meetings with Chief \nExecutives and Health Inspectors of local authorities to strengthen enforcement, improve \ninter-agency coordination and ensure sustained actions against illegal and its associated \npublic health and flooding risks, among other items. My last meeting was held on Monday 06 \nApril 2026. \nMadam Speaker, Government remains fully committed to reinforcing enforcement, \nenhancing public awareness and strengthening the legal framework to effectively combat \nillegal dumping and mitigate its impact on drainage systems and flooding. With these \nmeasures being implemented across the island, sustained success requires close collaboration \nbetween different Ministries and the public.  \nIn this respect, I wish to assure the hon. Member that my Ministry and local authorities \nremain fully receptive to any specific representation, including the identification of particular \nhot spot within her constituency or elsewhere. Should any additional information, proposal or \nsuggestion be brought forward, these will be duly examined and appropriate site visit and \ntargeted intervention will be carried out promptly in collaboration with all relevant \nstakeholders. This approach ensures that our response remains proactive, evidence-based and \nfocused on priority areas in the interest of protecting public health, preserving the \nenvironment and reducing flood risks. Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Dr. Ms Daureeawo! \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Could the hon. Minister state whether consideration is being given \nto introducing stricter liability provisions as a means of deterrence? \nMr Woochit: Yes, Madam Speaker. We have fixed penalty notices currently set at \nRs25,000. For the financial year 2026-2027, the proposal has already been submitted to \nreview and to increase fixed penalties, including the doubling of certain fines. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Can the hon. Minister state whether in all the known illegal \ndumping hot spots, there are CCTV surveillance? \nMr Woochit: Yes, Madam Speaker, I have already listed a series of mitigating \nmeasures. The increased use of Safe City cameras is also considered. it is one among them. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, fine!  \nNow, Mr François, Second Member for Rodrigues! \nNATIONAL ARCHIVES – RODRIGUES HERITAGE VALUE DOCUMENTS – \nDIGITALISATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/363",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 363,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/363) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister \nof Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the digitalisation of the National Archives, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom information as to where matters stand, \nindicating whether documents of heritage value pertaining to Rodrigues available thereat \nhave already been digitalised.",
      "answer": "Mr Gondeea: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the National Archives Department \nthat the Digitalisation Programme, which is an ongoing exercise, has already enabled, under \nPhase 1 and 2, approximately 1.3 million pages to be successfully scanned, indexed and \nuploaded on the Document Management System. These records comprise a wide range of \narchival materials, dating back to the colonial period, including secretariat correspondences, \nofficial government papers, administrative records, judicial and magistracy records as well as \nother historical documents of national and heritage value. \nI am further informed that the National Archives Department is currently finalising the \nscope of services and the bidding documents for the implementation of Phase 3 of the project, \nwhereby about 400,000 archival records will be digitised. \nMadam Speaker, as regards documents of heritage value pertaining to Rodrigues, I am \ninformed that all the 101 volumes of archival records, representing approximately 50,000 \npages, have already been scanned and digitised as at date. These include secretariat \ncorrespondences, secretariat papers and Rodrigues magistracy letters, covering the period \nfrom 1795 to 1929. The process of the uploading and indexing these reports on the Document \nManagement System is ongoing.  \nI am further informed that the Archives Department is already providing access to \nscanned records upon request, including from the Rodrigues Regional Assembly. However, \nthe Document Management System has not yet been deployed for online access as there are \nsome technical issues with the system, and which are currently being looked into.  \nMoreover, to facilitate the sharing of archived information with our counterparts in \nRodrigues, a Memorandum of Understanding between the National Archive Department and \nthe Rodrigues Regional Assembly is currently being finalised by my Ministry. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to highlight the House that the initiative of digitising our \narchival records, including the records pertaining to Rodrigues, forms part of Government’s \nbroader strategy to both preserve archival heritage and progressively enhance access to \nhistorical records through modern digital platforms and strengthen institutional collaboration. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr François: Thank you, Madam Speaker. I thank the hon. Minister for his answer. \nMay I know from the hon. Minister, given that the public and we, from Rodrigues, cannot get \nonline access to the readily available digitised archive system, what is the timeframe to allow \naccess thereof? The approximate timeframe. Do we have a timeframe? \nMadam Speaker: The timeframe, if you can. \nMr François: Approximately. \nMr Gondeea: As I said in my reply, there are some technical issues on the system. We \nare working on it. As soon as it is okay, it will be available shortly. \nMadam Speaker: Good! Mr Edouard, last question! \nRODRIGUES VEHICLE FITNESS CENTRE – SERVICE INTERRUPTION & \nDECENTRALISED OPERATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/364",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 364,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/364) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nLand Transport whether, in regard to the vehicle fitness centre in Rodrigues, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, \ninformation as to the reasons for the recent closure thereof, indicating why the \npublic was not informed accordingly, and  \n(b) \nstate whether consideration will be given for the operation thereof to be entrusted \nto a local vehicle examiner.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the NLTA that there is \ncurrently one vehicle examination centre in Rodrigues, which is manned by a vehicle \nexaminer of the NLTA, posted to Rodrigues on a tour of service of one year. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that the vehicle examination \ncentre was closed for one day, on 20 March 2026, due to the absence of the vehicle examiner. \nA notice to that effect was issued to inform the public through a communiqué posted at both \nthe NLTA Office at Baie Lascar and at the Vehicle Examination Centre of Port Mathurin as \nfrom Monday, 16 March 2026. So, the public was informed.  \nI have a copy of the communiqué. I can table it.  \nI am further informed that the centre resumed its activity on the following day. Also, I \nam further informed that it has been the practice for the vehicle examination centre to be \nclosed when the said officer is on leave. \nMadam Speaker, as regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the NLTA that \nthe appointment of a locally based examiner for the setting up of a private examination \nfacility has also been examined in line with my reply to PQ B/864 of 07 October 2025.  \nHowever, I am made to understand that in view of the size of the vehicle population in \nRodrigues and the relatively low number of vehicles requiring examination, averaging some \n160 vehicles per week, that is, about 32 vehicles per day, the level of activity remains \ninsufficient to sustain a dedicated facility on a viable basis.  \nIt is apposite to highlight that the setting up of such a facility requires significant capital \ninvestment and reasonably high operational costs. This is the reason why one has ever \nexpressed interest to launch into that activity. \nNevertheless, like I have stated in my reply, my Ministry has requested the NLTA to \nlaunch and expression of interest for inviting vehicle examination stations currently in \nMauritius to extend their services to Rodrigues. If they should find the initial investment to be \ntoo high for it to be done on a solo basis, they may join with other examination operation \ncentres in Mauritius to submit a joint proposal, in the spirit of social contribution. So to speak \nfor the sake of road safety. \nHowever, the quest for developing social capacity for enhancement of the equipment \nwill continue to be explored. My Ministry will be attentive to all proposals that may bring a \nlasting solution to the prevailing situation. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, alright. We have got one minute left! \nMr Edouard: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister if there is a \nMemorandum of Understanding, if not, if he will consider one with the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly for NLTA Services in Rodrigues? Thank you. \nMr Osman Mahomed: I believe there should be one because NLTA has been posted in \nRodrigues for a long time now but then if that needs to be reviewed, we will do so. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Time is up! \nNow, the Table has been advised that the following PQs have been withdrawn – B/323, \nB/365, B/366, B/367, B/370, B/371, B/373, B/374, B/376, B/377, B/379, B/380, B/382, \nB/383, B/384, B/386, B/388, B/389, B/392, B/393, B/395, B/396, B/397.  \nThe Table has advised me. I trust it is correct. \nYes, maybe motion! \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Minister of Housing and Lands (Mr S. Mohamed): Madam Speaker, I beg to \nmove that all the business on today’s Order Paper be exempted from the provisions of \nparagraph (2) of Standing Order 10. \nMr Bhagwan rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: Now, let’s break for half an hour! Let’s come back at 16.30 hours. \nOn revient à 16.30. \nAt 4.07 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 4.34 p.m., with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: You may be seated! \nPUBLIC BILL \nSecond Reading \nTHE ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING, COMBATTING THE FINANCING OF \nTERRORISM AND COUNTERING PROLIFERATION FINANCING  \n(MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) BILL \n(No. III of 2026) \nOrder read for resuming adjourned debate on the Second Reading of the Anti-Money \nLaundering, Combatting the Financing of Terrorism and Countering Proliferation Financing \n(Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill (No. III of 2026). \nQuestion again proposed. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, normally, the Leader of the House would have been \nspeaking much later. Let me refer you to Standing Order 39 which says – \n“(11) No Member shall address the Assembly on a particular question after the speech, \nif any, of the Leader of the House, except the mover of a motion for his or her winding-\nup speech, unless the Leader of the House has indicated to the Speaker his or her \nintention of addressing the Assembly at an early stage in the debates.” \nWhich is the case for the hon. Prime Minister.  \nSo, hon. Prime Minister, you have the floor on the Second Reading. \n(4.35 p.m.) \nThe Prime Minister: I thank you, Madam Speaker. It is because I have to catch a plane \nbasically.  \nLet me first of all, Madam Speaker, commend the hon. Minister of Financial Services \nand Economic Planning for introducing this very important legislation, which provides for \namendments to no fewer than 21 pieces of legislation. 21, Madam Speaker! \nThe amendments are necessary to ensure that our framework for Anti-Money \nLaundering, Combatting the Financing of Terrorism and Countering Proliferation Financing \nis fully aligned with the updated Financial Action Task Force (FATF) standards. \nThey will place Mauritius in a stronger position for the forthcoming Mutual Evaluation \nexercise by the Eastern and Southern Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group, which is \nscheduled to start in 2027. \nThe House will recall, Madam Speaker, that following the Mutual Evaluation exercise \ncarried out by the Eastern and Southern Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group in 2018, \nMauritius was obliged – I stress on the word ‘obliged’ – to implement the recommended \naction to address the deficiencies and shortcomings in its AML/CFT/CPF framework.  \nHowever, after that, the previous government failed to implement the recommended \nactions effectively. Consequently, in February 2020, Mauritius was placed on the FATF List \nof “Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring”, that is, the FATF Grey List. Mauritius was \nalso placed on the High-Risk Third Countries Lists of both the European Union and the \nUnited Kingdom. \nThe then Government again was compelled urgently to take appropriate action to \ncomply with the requirements of FATF.  \nIt was only then that Mauritius escaped from the Grey List; they were in the grey list \nbefore we came to power in 2005. Subsequently, the country was delisted from the European \nUnion and the United Kingdom lists of High-Risk Third Countries.  \nBut that Government failed to draw the lessons of its inaction because nothing was \nfurther done. \nSo, upon assuming office, we undertook a comprehensive and rigorous assessment of \nour AML/CFT/CPF framework in line with the revised FATF Recommendations.  \nThis Government is fully committed to the necessary action to ensure full compliance \nwith the FATF Standards and to strengthen the effectiveness of our system in combating \nmoney laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation financing. \nMadam Speaker, we shall spare no effort to ensure that Mauritius does not find itself on \nthe FATF Grey List again because a return to the Grey List would have far-reaching and \ndamaging consequences for our financial services sector and the economy as a whole. \nWe acted decisively to implement a comprehensive set of measures to ensure our full \npreparedness for the forthcoming Mutual Evaluation exercise.  \nFirst, we have taken immediate measures to enhance the effectiveness of our \ninstitutions. We reinstated the primacy of the Director of Public Prosecutions in its criminal \nproceedings, so dangerously and deliberately undermined during a decade of unconstitutional \nabuse. We will ensure that the Financial Crimes Commission (FCC) is able to focus on its \ncore mandate of investigation and enforcement. \nToday, the statistics speak for themselves. Since November 2024, some 400 \ninvestigations have already been initiated.  \nVery soon, we shall introduce into this House, I must say, the most far-reaching and \nradical reform of our systems of law-enforcement and prosecution that this country has seen, \nprobably since the 19th century – I am sure since the 19th century. They are the most radical \nand far-reaching reform that this country would have seen. Those reforms will entrench a new \nculture of independence, impartiality and effectiveness into the detection, investigation and \nprosecution of serious and complex crimes. \nSecond, we have put in place the necessary governance structure to drive our reform \nagenda. An Inter-Ministerial Committee, co-chaired by the hon. Attorney General and the \nhon. Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning, has been set up to steer and \ncoordinate all the preparatory efforts. This Committee provides strategic guidance on priority \nreforms, strengthens the coordination across the 16 Competent Authorities, and oversees the \neffective implementation of the national AML/CFT/CPF reforms agenda. \nThe Inter-Ministerial Committee is further supported by the Core Group on \nAML/CFT/CPF, under the chairmanship of the Financial Secretary.  \nI am maintaining a close oversight of the work carried out by both the Inter-Ministerial \nCommittee and the Core Group. \nThird, Madam Speaker, within this relatively short period, we have made significant \nand tangible progress with critical AML/CFT/CPF initiatives. These include – \n(a) \nthe completion of the National Risk Assessment, providing an up-to-date \nunderstanding of the evolving money laundering and terrorist financing risks \nfacing our country; \n(b) \nthe completion of a dedicated risk assessment for Non-Profit Organisations; \n(c) \nthe formulation of a comprehensive National AML/CFT/CPF Strategy for the \nperiod 2026-2029, and \n(d) \nthe development of a robust Administrative Penalty Framework to ensure that \nnon-compliance with our legislation is effectively detected, addressed, and also \nsanctioned. \nFourth, Madam Speaker, we have effectively enforced the United Nations (Financial \nProhibitions, Arms Embargo and Travel Ban) Sanctions Act and, based on evidence gathered, \nalready three individuals have been listed under the sanction regime for their links to terrorist \nfinancing activities. \nFifth, despite severe fiscal constraints, we are providing the necessary financial \nresources to build capacity and recruit critical expertise to ensure the sustained \nimplementation of our AML/CFT/CPF reforms. \nMadam Speaker, let me now turn to some key amendments being brought to this \nlegislation falling under the purview of my office and that of the Ministry of Finance. \nFirst, the Bank of Mauritius Act and the Banking Act – these amendments aim to \nenhance the effectiveness of supervision and enforcement by the Bank of Mauritius. They \nalso facilitate timely information sharing with law enforcement authorities where there is \nsuspicion of an offence. \nSecond, the Companies Act – the amendment provides for a clearer and more structured \ndefinition of a beneficial owner, ensuring consistent interpretation and application across \nentities. This ensures, Madam Speaker, that the true individuals, who ultimately own or \ncontrol business activities, may no longer hide and operate behind corporate structures and \nremain beyond the reach of institutions. We see so many times, people using prête-nom. I tell \nthem: game over! \nThird, the Gambling Regulatory Authority Act – the gambling sector continues to \npresent heightened exposure to illicit financial flows. The proposed amendments are intended \nto reinforce regulatory oversight, strengthen control mechanisms, and enhance compliance \nmeasures, thereby safeguarding the sector against money laundering risk. \nFourth, the Income Tax Act and the Mauritius Revenue Authority Act – these acts are \nbeing amended to reinforce the powers of the Mauritius Revenue Authority, enhance \ncoordination among the competent Authorities, and ensure that illicit gains do not escape \nscrutiny. \nAnd fifth, the United Nations (Financial Prohibitions, Arms Embargo and Travel Ban) \nSanctions Act is being amended to further strengthen the implementation of targeted financial \nsanctions. \nMadam Speaker, I should remind the House of the chaotic situation prevailing before \nthe elections in November 2024 in the institutions which were supposed to combat fraud, \ncorruption and financial crime.  \nThere was total incoherence in the way these institutions were operating. There was no \ncollaboration or exchange of information among them. They had over the years developed, I \nthink, willingly, a ‘silo mentality’ with consequences that I need not rehearse now! \nWe all recall how drug traffickers, money launderers and those engaged in criminal \nactivities were having a field day, while the rule of law was daily abused in our public life by \nthe behaviour of those who were supposed to be looking after safeguarding the security. \nToday, our institutions are once again functioning without fear or favour and in \ncollaboration for the public good. As I have said, Madam Speaker, the House will imminently \nhave the opportunity to make further profound reforms to strengthen the independence and \neffectiveness of those institutions. \nIt is not only domestic voices who say that. It is not just me or Members of the House. \nThe 2026 Report of the respected V-Dem Institute (Varieties of Democracies Institute), \nwhich is based in Sweden, published recently the following observation. I quote, Madam \nSpeaker – \n“The 2024 general elections brought a change in government and halted authoritarian \ntransgressions.” \n“Halted authoritarian transgressions!” This is what the MSM was doing daily!  \nIt is worth dwelling on those words, Madam Speaker. Transgressions were, indeed, the \nmodus operandi of the previous Government. \nSo deep and so widespread was the abuse, extending to the very top of government, \nencompassing even those entrusted with the task of ensuring the integrity of our system of \nlaw enforcement, that the imagination shrinks from the prospect for our nation had they \nsucceeded in their objects. \nThis House will recall the statements I made here last year, reporting the conclusions \nof international experts – they have not actually concluded it completely – but on the \nOrwellian technology, if I may use the word, secretly installed by the previous government, \nillegally, to intercept and spy on the communications and social media of the entire nation. \nBelieve it or not! We will come with proof on this.  \nEven hon. A. Duval who is here, he was being listened to! Judges were being listened \nto! Well, what was happening?  \nMr A. Duval: You too! \nThe Prime Minister: Everybody, yes! Of course, me! And people in the Opposition.  \n(Interruptions) \nYes, but even people in the government, they were being listened to! Not just political \nopponents; the whole population!  \nThe House will also recall with disgust the ugly window thrown open by the Moustass \nleaks on the inside workings of an autocratic and immoral regime. They even went to the \nextent of defaming Virgin Mary. The Commissioner of Police did that. He did that! And it \nwas tolerated. Nothing!  \nI know, hon. A. Duval’s father went to see the former Prime Minister on this. I know \nthat! And he told him: ‘You have to remove this guy.’ No, no, you get lost!  \nHis hands were tied! When you do dirty business with people, your hands get tied! \nThat is the problem! \nThe V-Dem views on Mauritius reflect the seriousness of the purpose of this \nGovernment to ensure that our institutions operate transparently and independently and never \nagain, never again, go back to the sinister and dark path charted by that discredited regime. \nBut I am glad to say, Madam Speaker, that in the Global Financial Centres Index \n(GFCI 39) published on 26 March 2026, Mauritius has now gained 8 places and ranks in the \n50th position globally. \nThis achievement did not happen by itself; it is testament to the strategic focus of this \nGovernment to enhance our regulatory frameworks and protect our reputation as a trusted \nInternational Financial Centre. \nMadam Speaker, I want to refresh the memory of those who seem to be suffering \nfrom selective amnesia, in particular those who are desperately trying to re-emerge on the \npolitical scene. He is not here, but Minister Patrick Assirvaden mentioned the name, Alvaro \nSobrinho, described by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, and I quote… \n(Interruptions) \nYeah, I will say that! \nLook what it says – \n  “Angolan banker who led an Angolan bank that collapsed with billions of dollars of \nunexplained debts, linked to a scheme to siphon off hundreds of millions of dollars of \ngovernment-backed financing”. \nYet, this man was given red-carpet treatment in Mauritius, granted access to the VIP \nlounge, not once, not twice, 31 times! 31 times! And he was not alone. There were others of \ndubious background who were facilitated and feted, as investigations into the collapse of \nSilver Bank is now beginning to show us. \nIn fact, I should say, Madam Speaker, this Mr Sobrinho, I did not realise because I \nnever met him, but somehow, he found his way to the PMO. He called my secretary and he \nsaid he needs to meet the Prime Minister. It is urgent. He was not on the… \nWhen I give appointments, if I give appointments to Mr A. Duval… \nMr A. Duval: You have not ... \nThe Prime Minister: I will see him alone. Not with somebody else! I need to know \nwho comes in my office. \n(Interruptions) \nDr. Boolell: Pou li… \nMr A. Duval: Non, li pann dir mwa! \n(Interruptions) \nMadam Speaker: Not yet. Not yet. \nThe Prime Minister: To bien kot to ete la! \n(Interruptions) \nI tell you, Madam Speaker. So, my secretary… \nMadam Speaker: You have not met him yet? \nThe Prime Minister: Huh? \nMadam Speaker: He said you did not meet him. But you have not met him yet. \nThe Prime Minister: No, I have not met him. I was giving an example. Even \nsomebody in the Opposition, I will meet only on appointment. \nMr A. Duval: But I raised the… I raised the… \nThe Prime Minister: And so, my secretary came to see me and said there is this man \nhere, Mr Sobrinho, who says he needs to see you.  \nI said – \n‘Why? Does he have an appointment?’  \n‘No!’ \n‘So, why does he want to see me?’ \nHe said to my secretary: ‘I have millions of dollars to invest in Mauritius.’ You know \nwhen you come in the Office of the Prime Minister and you say: ‘I have got millions of \ndollars to invest,’ what does it mean? It means: Meet me. I will give you some millions!  \nThat is what it means! That was what was happening before! \nAnd I said to my secretary, if he wants to invest in Mauritius, he does not have to come \nand see the Prime Minister. Go to the Board of Investment! This is where they look at \ninvestment. So, I threw him out. He was not happy, but he went. \nAnd I must say, at that time, the Board of Investment did due diligence. They thought \nhis money was dubious, of dubious sources, and they rejected his millions that he was \nbringing in Mauritius. They rejected it! What did he do you think, Madam Speaker? He came \nback to my office and told my secretary: ‘These people at the Board of Investment do not \nunderstand anything. They have rejected my project. I must see the Prime Minister!’ \nSo, again, my secretary came to see me. I said, tell him: ‘If the Board of Investment has \nrejected his demands, then, I have nothing to do with it. He must get out of the country.’ \nThis is how I treated him!  \nAnd this is the very man who came, after I lost the elections, he was given red-carpet \ntreatment, 31 times! And he was not alone, as I said. There were others. \nDr. Boolell: Karpet inn ize! \n(Interruptions) \nThe Prime Minister: In 2015, Mr Sobrinho was granted a Global Business Licence \n(Category 1) and the authorisation to operate Collective Investment Schemes by the Financial \nServices Commission (FSC) chaired at that time by the late Dev Manraj. \nIn 2016, Mr Sobrinho was issued an Investment Adviser (Unrestricted) Licence and an \nInvestment Banking Licence by the same FSC.  \nLet me remind the House who conducted, and how was the due diligence… You must \ndo due diligence. How was due diligence done on Mr Sobrinho? \nMr Jhummun: Get dan lizie! \nThe Prime Minister: It was done by eye contact!  \nI quote the former Deputy Prime Minister, Ivan Collendavello, a lawyer, who said – \nwhat is all this nonsense? – he said – \n« (…) avoir regardé dans les yeux de [M. Sobrinho], [je peux dire que] ce dernier est \ncrédible. » \nThat is why I said we do not have to do due diligence! Just get this man to come and \nlook at the other prospective investors. This is what he meant. \n(Interruptions) \nAnd he is trying to give us lessons! How can a supposedly, allegedly eminent lawyer \nsay it is due diligence: I look at his face, I say ‘no, he is innocent’? \nAlvaro Sobrinho was issued an Investment Banking Licence, after those procedures had \nbeen transferred from the Bank of Mauritius to the FSC. Now, it is important to realise in \nwhat circumstances were these amendments made and why were they made. I will tell you \nwhy; because the then Governor of the Bank of Mauritius, Mr Basant Roi, flatly refused to \ngive Mr Sobrinho an Investment Banking Licence, in spite of the pressure being put on him. \nHe refused!  \nThen the Banking Act was amended in catimini to remove “investment banking \nbusiness” from the definition of a “bank” so that only the Financial Services Commission \nthereafter regulated this business. Consequentially, amendments were brought to the \nFinancial Services Act.  All this to grant Mr Sobrinho his licence that the Governor of bank \nthen thought he should not be given such a licence. \nRemember how in 2017, on a Saturday morning, a special meeting of the Board of the \nFSC was called, chaired by late Mr Dev Manraj. It was convened to put pressure to amend \nthe law.  \nI must say to the House as perhaps some people do not know it. The then Solicitor \nGeneral, Mr Dhiren Daby was the vice-Chairperson of the Board. He refused to be associated \nwith the said manoeuvres in spite of all the pressures. Further to the ‘Saturday morning \nmeeting’ when he said he would not agree, Mr Daby and three other members of the Board \nresigned from their position. They did not look at the money, the per diem, or whatever. They \nresigned from their positions at the FSC. I will tell you who the three others were – \n• \nMr Warda Dulmar Ebrahim; \n• \nMr Rhoy Ramlakhan, and \n• \nMr Jacques Li Chung. \nThese are the men of principles who resisted pressure.  \nYou know, recently when the people from the IMF were here, they were asking us: ‘But \nwhen the Finance Minister was manipulating figures, we cannot understand, this is a \ndemocratic State. Why did everybody keep quiet?’ I do not want to say the words because \nthere are ladies here, but they did not have the guts. They kept quiet, afraid. \nMr Jhummun: Ti pe manze ansam. \nThe Prime Minister: I always say, you know what Shakespeare said – \n“The cowards die many times before their deaths;  \nThe valiant never taste of death but once.” \nThis is what we should do. We pray every day. We are a nation which prays but this is what \nwe should do. We should not be afraid. We must do what must be done.  \nThe Sobrinho affair, Madam Speaker, involved shady dealings, investments in property \nschemes to the tune – believe it or not – of Rs52 million, and the purchase of luxury cars for \nmillions of rupees.  \nThe same Mr Sobrinho was authorised to purchase 131 villas and apartments – worth \nmore than Rs1 billion – at Balaclava, under the Vente en Etat Futur d’Achèvement.  \nAn hon. Member: VEFA! \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, VEFA.  \nThe above demonstrates to what extent in the 2014-2024 days, money laundered \nthrough property development and property acquisition was welcomed as if foreign \ninvestment was going up. And if you look at the list – we are looking at the list – you will see \nwho are the people who got flats and apartments. They will have to respond. Do not think we \nhave forgotten! It is taking time but they will have to explain all this. It is coming, I can tell \nyou.  \nAnother example is the Silver Bank Saga!  \nLet me mention the troubling circumstances under which a Banking Licence was issued \nto Silver Bank, formerly, I think, it was called BanyanTree Bank, in November 2021.  \nFirst, we should ask a pertinent question: Who was it who recommended Mr Prateek \nGupta to take over BanyanTree? Who was it? He came from nowhere?  \nThere was reasonable cause to believe that the capital of Silver Bank was potentially \nimpaired and that its directors could have engaged in practices detrimental to the interests of \nits depositories. Silver Bank had absolutely no track record. Its Ultimate Beneficial Owners \nhad no banking experience and the bank, which is currently under investigation by the \nFinancial Crimes Commission, deceived thousands of Mauritians. I see some people are \nprotesting. They should go and protest to these people who allowed this to happen. We are \nputting order in these things. \nThis is unbelievable but I will tell you. Before Silver Bank came into the picture, a \ncircular was issued by the Ministry of Finance of the previous regime requesting government-\nrelated entities to invest their surplus cash into treasury certificates because they are much \nsafer. Issued from the Ministry of Finance and the Bank of Mauritius was involved, to put the \nmoney where it is safer. This very Ministry then purposedly, to create a misleading \nenhancement of the bank’s balance, they decided to issue a circular – this very government – \nto tell the related entities, that is, the Municipal Council, Sugar Insurance Fund, I think, the \nNational Insurance Company and all that, they invested a total of Rs3.55 billion in the Silver \nBank. They had issued the circular. They contradicted themselves.  \nThey issued another circular now, put the money in Silver Bank and look at the result. \nWho is losing money now?  \n(Interruptions) \nYes, but they thought this country belongs to them. They can do what they want. \nMr Gunness: Bizin donn li kout savat dodo. \nThe Prime Minister: Yes! This was, as I said, purposedly done to create the misleading \nimpression of enhancing the balance of the bank’s balance sheet. This decision to invest so \nmuch money in such a bank was outright incompetence bordering on criminal offence. They \nhad a duty to safeguard public funds. I hope speaking Kreol in Parliament will come earlier \nbecause many people do not understand. In Kreol, I could have said it better: se bann \nkriminel… \nMr Jhummun: Voler! \nThe Prime Minister: … kin pran lamone lepep, inn fer investi dan enn labank ki zot ti \nkone pou koule divan! \nSa ki zot finn fer! \nWhat is even more unexplainable, as I said, the issue in the circular, a clear dereliction \nof duty in safeguarding public funds.  \nThe serious mismanagement, Madam Speaker, fictitious guarantees and recklessness \npertaining to loan reimbursement led to the toxicity of the loan portfolio of Silver Bank. This \nis how they operated and we all know what happened. We are sitting on it now.  \nSilver Bank was placed under conservatorship in February 2024. A monthly \nconservatorship fee of Rs3.5 million was payable to whom? Grant Thornton Advisory \nServices Ltd.  \nMr Jhummun: Sattar! \nThe Prime Minister: And who was the Director? The close friend of the former Prime \nMinister, close friend! Outside he was making a campaign against Muslims, and yet his close \nfriend was this man. And we all know his name – Sattar Hajee Abdoula. Hajee of all things! \nI need to add, Madam Speaker, that during this process several potential investors \nexpressed the interest to acquire Silver Bank. This happened even when Mr Rama Sithanen \nwas Governor of the bank. But then when they saw what was on the balance sheet, they all \ndisappeared one by one. Only one prospective investor submitted an application, but his \napplication, I can say I think, he wanted to get the bank but not take the debts. How can we \ndo that? He was asking for more time. \nIn the interest of depositors and creditors of Silver Bank, the Bank of Mauritius has \nbeen engaging with the prospective investor and granted several extensions to each \nsuccessive deadline – there were deadlines, again deadlines and again deadlines – to enable \nthem to see what they can do. On 30 March of this year, on the last deadline, the Bank of \nMauritius did not receive any application.  \nAfter careful consideration of all facts and information available, the Board of the Bank \nof Mauritius, on 30 March of this year, decided to terminate the conservatorship of Silver \nBank. Mr Huns Biltoo of KPMG Mauritius has now been appointed as Receiver of Silver \nBank.  \nMadam Speaker, the scandals to which I referred earlier, gave a severe blow to our \nhard-earned reputation as a credible International Financial Centre. They illustrate the kind of \noccult interest and influences which were encouraged and provided by the previous regime. I \nthink it is more than criminal negligence; it is criminal intent. There is criminal intent there. It \nis more serious. It is not just negligence. It is intent. \nIn due time, these people, I say it again, will have to answer for their misdeeds. This is \none of the reasons we are coming up with the National Crime Agency. You will see the \ndifference very soon. \nA lot of criticisms have been levered at the level of the EDB. They say undue delay in \nprocessing applications for investment in Mauritius, so many millions are waiting. There is a \ndue process that they follow. Maybe we could do it a bit quicker, I do not know, but let me \ngive to the House a concrete example to show how it is extremely important to have a \nthorough prior check and assessment.  \nQuite recently, a prospective investor came with a project worth nearly Rs5 billion. \nWhen they investigated, he was getting all sorts of nervousness. He was trying to contact \npeople in high office but they found out it was a blatant case of laundering dirty money, and \nit was refused, turned down. But it took a long time to investigate. \nMadam Speaker, it is ironical that the hon. Leader of the Opposition reminded the \nHouse that “justice denied is justice delayed”. But that was the philosophy of the previous \nGovernment which cost the taxpayers billions of rupees! Not millions; billions! \nWe remember the Betamax case. It has cost the country Rs5.6 billion of taxpayers’ \nmoney, that is, everybody who is here, their money which has gone down the drain because \nof the incompetency and the criminal negligence. In that case, in terms of legal costs, the \nState Trading Corporation paid Mr Ravin Chetty nearly Rs20 million! What do we do with \nthese people? What should we do with these people? \nThe delays referred to by the hon. Leader of the Opposition are the result of \nlongstanding structural weaknesses by the former regime. And everywhere it is like that; even \nin the Police. That is why we are bringing new laws. We cannot afford to have these \nstructural weaknesses everywhere. You know what happened? Look at the former \nCommissioner of Police. He was called by the FCC. He had already prepared an … \nAn hon. Member: A statement? \nThe Prime Minister: Not a statement. He even prepared what is called in court… \nAn hon. Member: An affidavit? \nThe Prime Minister: An affidavit. Before the questions were asked, he knew what \nquestions were going to be asked! How does this happen? Leakage! These worms, who are \nleaking information, they will have to answer in the future. I must tell you this! \nWe have taken decisive actions and we are going to do more. The Administrative \nPenalty Regulations, pending since 2022, were finalised last year. They now allow authorities \nto impose sanctions directly, without lengthy court procedures. \nMadam Speaker, hon A. Duval describes these reforms as “cosmetic”. This is not only \ninaccurate, but it undermines the extensive work carried out by our institutions.  \nThese amendments are the results of work undertaken by professionals from the \nAttorney-General’s Office, the Bank of Mauritius and the Financial Crimes Commission, in \nconsultation with other competent authorities.  \nThe amendments take into consideration the findings of the National Risk Assessment, \nas well as an independent assessment of our AML/CFT/CPF framework, and are supported \nby a detailed mapping against FATF requirements. Therefore, with all due respect, it is not \ncosmetic. It is a serious, technical and coordinated reform effort. \nHon. A. Duval also raised concerns regarding the motor vehicle sector and has \nsuggested, like many others do, that the framework is inadequate in addressing the associated \nrisks.  \nLet me clarify that the AML/CFT/CPF framework is complex and evolving, requiring a \nrisk-based and carefully calibrated approach. Any reforms must be properly analysed because \nyou can get unintended consequences on economic activities and on citizens. \nIt is precisely in this context that the Ministry of Financial Services and Economic \nPlanning is currently undertaking a Typology Report on Motor Vehicle Trade. This exercise \nwill enable a comprehensive assessment of money laundering risks and typologies associated \nwith the sector, determine appropriate thresholds for cash transactions, and identify robust \nsafeguards to prevent abuse for money laundering purposes. In this regard, a Typology \nReport on Motor Vehicle Trade is underway and it will assess risks, determine appropriate \ncash thresholds, and identify safeguards. \nHowever, we are not just saying this, Madam Speaker. Last year, the Government \nintroduced regulations requiring traceable payment methods, with only a limited cash deposit \nof Rs20,000. Maybe Rs20,000 is a bit low, but we are looking at this. \nLet me reiterate the statistics on enforcement actions by the Financial Crimes \nCommission in relation to motor vehicle-related money laundering activities – \n(a) \na total of 86 attachments and seizure orders have been issued;  \n(b) \nover 300 vehicles have been seized, including luxury vehicles;  \n(c) \nthe estimated value of vehicles seized exceeds Rs280 million, and  \n(d) \nseveral car rental companies have been identified and are being investigated as \nvehicles for laundering criminal proceeds. \nThese are real actions delivering real results. \nMadam Speaker, we must remain steadfast and forward-looking, driving the reforms \nnecessary to safeguard and strengthen the AML/CFT/CPF framework. It is, in a way, a very \nclear national imperative. \nTo those engaged in doom-mongering and unwarranted criticism, let me be clear: our \nfocus remains firmly on implementing the reforms, upholding transparency and \naccountability, and successfully navigating the forthcoming Mutual Evaluation exercise. \nThere are people who actually want us to be downgraded; to go on the grey list. We must be \nmore patriotic. \nThe other day, I met a lady from India actually. Do you know what she said to me? She \nsaid, ‘I am very sorry for you, Prime Minister.’ I asked why. She said, ‘I see very few patriots \nin this country. Everybody is looking for something.’ Where is patriotism? We have to \nreunite the country and be patriots.  \nAs I repeatedly said during the campaign – Nou pou met lord kot ena dezord. Kwar \nmwa. Nou pou mete sa lord la ! \nLet me conclude by acknowledging the collective efforts of all the institutions engaged \nin this national endeavour, Madam Speaker, as well as the continued collaboration of the \nprivate sector and our international partners. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much. \nHon. Minister Subron! \n(5.14 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity (Mr A. Subron): Madam Speaker, first let me express my appreciation to the Minister, the Attorney \nGeneral and all the other Ministers who were part of the Interministerial Committee, who \nspearheaded this milestone bundle of a legislation.  \nVarious colleagues, Ministers and Members of the Government made significant \ncontribution during the debate on this Bill. My thanks go to them too. Some elaborated on the \ntechnical and institutional dimensions while others explained the further needs for a more \ntransparent and efficient financial sector. \nI will focus my intervention on a more philosophical dimension and a global historical \ncontext for this Bill to be laid on the Table of this Assembly. Let me start by addressing some \nissues raised by the Opposition parties. The Leader of the Opposition has essentially said, \nprimo, that the measures contained in this Bill are fine, but the problem will lie in the \nimplementation. My colleagues in Government have already responded to this argument.  \nSecundo, the Leader of the Opposition went on and said, let me quote the Hansard, \nMadam Speaker – \n“On novel offences, clause 8 amends the Environment Act 2024, introducing for the \nfirst time the offence of ecocide with penalties up to ten years of penal servitude. \nMadam Speaker, may the House be informed as to why this clause has been introduced \nin this Bill.” \nHe added – \n“I sincerely think that this amendment has nothing to do with AML/CFT.” \nTo this statement, my hon. colleague and comrade, hon. Etwareea, certainly one of the most \nleftist-leading Members of this Assembly, spontaneously responded to the Leader of the \nOpposition: ‘Bizin lir impe!’, hon. Etwareea said. \nAs a long-standing journalist with international experiences, he depicted instantly the \nblunder of the Leader of the Opposition. I will come back later to this erroneous statement \nmade by the Leader of the Opposition when he stated that ecocide and environmental crimes \nare not part of AML/CFT framework. \nTertio, the Leader of the Opposition then added that he sincerely believes that the \namendment on Environment Act on ecocide has been put in this Bill to please a party in the \ngovernment. \nMadam Speaker, one does not have to climb on the top roof of the Sun Trust Building \nto know that the Leader of the Opposition was referring to my party Rezistans ek Alternativ, \nwhich is the most ecologically inclined party in this government. Well, on this statement too, \nthe Leader of the Opposition has exposed his slander understanding of politics and its \ndynamics, especially in this global era. \nAs for the other Member of the Opposition who is still here – I am glad he is here – \nhon. A. Duval, his stand can be summarised as follows –  \n• \nThe present legal framework to tackle money laundering are already here and this \nlegislation is cosmetic and has been introduced to please AML/CFT.  \nHe is wrong too.  \nTo say the least, this posture certainly exposes his political dizziness of not \nunderstanding that one of the major amendments on ecocide would lead Mauritius forward \namongst the few first countries in the world to be introducing ecocide as a major crime \nconnected to financial crime. \nThis leaping section has not ever existed before in our statutes, and its introduction is \ncertainly not cosmetic, nor has it been made to please this time AML/CFT. \nMadam Speaker, fundamental laws in society are not made to please x or y. Those in \nOpposition who may have made laws within this constricted vision of pleasing somebody \ncannot understand that fundamental local and domestic laws are the product of social \nstruggles, in this case, of global social struggles, establishing new balance of forces, ethics \nand paradigm shifts. Of course, those who have never been part of or who are disconnected of \nsocial struggles, be it locally or globally, will never understand the dialectics of social \nstruggle and legislative enactments.  \nMajor struggles have led to major law changes in the history of humanity. In colonial \nslavery times, the abolitionist movement has been instrumental to bring laws to abolish slave \ntrades and system.  \nThe liberation and pro-independence struggles triggered fundamental laws to enact self-\ndetermination, especially in the global south. Global solidarity actions reinforce the local \nstruggle in South Africa to end apartheid legal framework. Workers’ struggle gave birth to \ncritical ILO Conventions. This piece of legislation, to be precise, this package of legislative \namendments, is the direct product of global struggles, emerging at the end of the last century \nand the beginning of this century. It is the product of the struggle of global movements for \nsocial, economic and environmental justice in the era of limitless global capitalism dominated \nby net worth billionaires. \nThe Global Justice Movement includes many organisations and networks. I will \nmention a few: Global Tax Justice Movement, Alternative World Social Forums, Our World \nIs Not For Sale, ATTAC, Third World Network, Oxfam, Friends of the Earth, Stop Genocide, \nClimate and Capitalism. Just to mention a few.  \nIn these global networks and struggles, my party, Rezistans ek Alternativ, and other \nmovements in which we are part of, and, myself, as an activist in various global justice \nmovements, have played an important role. Madam Speaker, these global justice movements \nare, in reality, the genesis of what we are debating today. \nHon. Leader of the Opposition, this law is not meant to please my party, but my party, \nas part of the global justice movement, contributed to shape the new laws to better protect the \npeople and the planet, which are being robbed by global capitalism. Yes, Madam Speaker, \nrobbed! I mean it.  \nLet me refer to the latest report of the prestigious Oxfam International, just published \non 02 April 2026. The amount of untaxed wealth hidden offshore by the richest 0.1% exceeds \nthe entire wealth of the poorest half of humanity, 4.1 billion people. The new Oxfam analysis \npublished it ahead of the 10th anniversary of the Panama Papers.  \nThe findings show that a decade later, the super-rich continue to explore offshore \nsystems to evade taxes and conceal assets, highlighting the urgent need for coordinated \ninternational action to tax extreme wealth. Oxfam estimates that 3.55 trillion in untaxed \nwealth are stashed offshore in tax havens and unreported accounts in 2024. This sum exceeds \nthe GDP of France, and is more than twice the GDP of the world’s 44 least developed \ncountries! The richest 0.1% hold approximately 80% of all untaxed offshore wealth or around \n$2.84 trillion. Within this timely group, the ultra-wealthiest, 0.01%, hold roughly $1.77 \ntrillion.  \nThis isn’t just about clever accounting. It is about power and impunity. When \nmillionaires and billionaires stash trillions of dollars in offshore tax haven, they place \nthemselves above their obligation that binds the rest of society. The consequences are \npredictable as they are devastating. We see our public hospitals and schools starve of funds, \nour social fabric shredded by rising in equality and ordinary people forced to shoulder the \ncost of a system rigged to enrich a tiny few. \nMadam Speaker, it is because of this cruel tendency of global capitalism that global, \nsocial and ecological justice movements have fought for the regulation of offshore financial \ncentres for more than 40 years. The AML/CFT and the FATF arose from those sociopolitical \ndynamics which have had to be taken on board by the political and ruling elite in many \nwestern countries. So, are some of the amendments being presently brought to this House. \nI will now deal specifically on three major dimensions of the emerging legal \nframeworks in connection with offshore financial sector and its impact in Mauritius –  \n1. Taxes.  \n2. Secrecy, and  \n3. the environmental crime and ecocide. \nTaxes. To curb tax evasion and tax avoidance, the Global Minimum Tax of 15% \nadopted by the OECD has been incorporated in Mauritian law last year in the form of \nQualified Domestic Minimum Top Up Tax (QDMTT). As a matter of fact, the Global \nMinimum Tax is itself the product of long-standing struggle of global justice movement. The \nglobal justice movement which includes organisation as Association for the Taxation of \nFinancial Transactions and for Citizens' Action (ATTAC), and Global Alliance for Tax Justice \nhas been fighting to end the race to the bottom in terms of taxation. \nAfter the Global Minimum Tax, the Global Justice Movement are now currently \ncampaigning for a UN tax convention which would move tax rule making it a more inclusive \nplatform where developing nations have an equal vote. They are also fighting for a broad \nFinancial Transaction Tax over the Global Minimum Tax. Unlike the GMT which targets \ncorporate profits, the FTT will target the volume of financial trades to curb market \nspeculation and raise funds for global public goods. \nMadam Speaker, maybe one of these days we will see future legislations to be debated \nin this House on UN Tax Convention, on Financial Transaction Tax not to please anybody, \nbut as a direct product of the relations between global social struggle and domestic law \nenactment.  \nOn secrecy, the fight against tax haven secrecy has been led by a coalition of whistle-\nblowers, investigative journalist, non-governmental organisation who have worked for \ndecades to export the hidden financial system of world elite. These included the global NGO \nlike Transparency International and many media such as the International Consortium of \nInvestigative Journalists who have been the spear heads of the global social movement \nagainst the secrecy that underpins many offshore financial sectors.  \nTen years ago, the Panama Papers were leaked to the world, this caused offshore \nfinance to come under mounting international scrutiny. The Panama Papers exposed how \nshell companies with complex corporate structures use secrecy to launder money and avoid \npaying taxes. The secrecy of the Mauritian offshore, its lack of supervision was notorious. \nThis contributed for Mauritius to be put on the grey list. \nMauritius took several steps including abolishing GBC2 licenses and replacing them \nwith a more regulated authorised company regime. The reform focused on implementing \nstricter substance requirements, requiring companies to have a physical presence and real \nactivity in Mauritius. In parallel, the law on ultimate beneficial owner in Mauritius has \nevolved significantly, shifting from light disclosure to strict transparency to meet \ninternational compliance standard of the FATF. \nIn 2024, the Registrar of Companies was tasked to maintain a largely confidential, \nbeneficial ownership accessible only to competent authorities. With the amendment proposed \ntoday, in the Companies Act, the primary difference lies in moving from simple threshold-\nbased percentage, 25%, to a broader natural person and control focus that aligns with \ninternational FATF standards. Thus, the amendment will expand, control definition. The new \nframework users cascade approach, looking beyond simple ownership, percentage, to include \ncontrol via voting rights or other means. It attributes default senior management if no natural \nperson is identified through ownership or control, the senior managing official must be \nidentified as a beneficial ownership. Madam Speaker, these are real changes not cosmetic \nones as claimed by the Opposition.  \nLet me come now to the environmental crimes and ecocide. Madam Speaker, that is the \nintroduction of environmental crime and ecocide as part of anti-money laundering \nframework. This is a recent and accelerated development; this again does not fall from the \nsky. It is due to the persistent global socio-ecological justice movement campaign after clear \nlinks have been established between environmental crimes and companies operating the \noffshore sectors. Many organisations such as Stop Ecocide International, Transparency \nInternational, Global Witness are part of them.  \nHistorically, money laundering was viewed as victimless financial crime. The Global \nJustice Movement reframed it by highlighting how illicit financial flows drain resources from \ndeveloping nations. This advocacy led to the inclusion of grand corruption and environmental \ncrime as predicate offences for money laundering. \nThe Global Justice Movement also pushed for the United Nations Convention against \nCorruption (UNCAC) to ensure that AML laws are not just stopping the flow of money but \nreturning the stolen assets to their rightful citizens. The intersection of environmental crimes, \necocide and reparation represent a major shift from traditional human centred justice to a \nmore eco-centric model that treats the environment as a victim on its own right. The inclusion \nof ecocide in law means criminalising the mass destruction of ecosystems thus, essentially, \ntreating environmental devastation with the same gravity as genocide or war crimes. I will \nnot go into the definition because of time. \nMadam Speaker, let me say, in this era of climate crisis, since extinction of bio-\ndiversities, destructive extractivist-driven economy, this amendment reflects the level of \nconsciousness attained by the people of the planet and their movement. It has become a \nmatter of survival. By adding ecocide in our statute book, Mauritius becomes a pioneer \ncountry in socio-ecological justice and custodianship. \nI think, this section on ecocide and environmental crimes marks the biggest leap in \nMauritian environmental law since independence. The European Union has already moved to \ncriminalise environmental crime and countries like Belgium, France, Vietnam, Chile have \nalready incorporated ecocide and ecocide-like legislations in their domestic law.  \nFor the hon. Leader of the Opposition who is not here but who was sincerely wondering \nwhy the inclusion of this amendment in our law for FATF compliance purpose, I will humbly \nrequest him to read, lir impe the FATF report on Money Laundering from Environmental \nCrime, June 2021. I will recommend him to lir impe the new Environmental Crime Directive, \nDirective 2024/1203. These two documents will surely enlighten him on the issue.  \nLet me add that the amendments we are bringing to this House, beside making ecocide \na crime in our law punishable by imprisonment, criminalises non-compliance to \nenvironmental protection fee. It extends the provision of assets recovery to environmental \ncrime and the ecocide and for the first time ever, introduces reparation in our law for ecocide. \nThe new Section 135B provides for Non-Criminal Penalties or Measures. The new section \n135C provides for Recovery of Expenses. \nMadam Speaker, we, the people of Mauritius, who lived the first marine ecocide of our \nhistory through the oil spill arising through Wakashio shipwreck, should applaud this \namendment being brought to the Environmental Act. \nI am sure if the previous government could be brought to court under this new law, it \nwould have surely been condemned for ecocide. The wanton,  the reckless disregard for an \nenvironmental consequence during the first 12 days of Wakashio shipwreck would have been \nsufficient for them to be condemned for ecocide. \nIn any case, this law would have also opened the door for massive reparation for the \nprejudice caused to the people of Mahebourg and South East coast by the companies and \nagencies which caused this ecocidal spread of the marée noire – the oil spill after 12 days of \nreckless disregard for an environmental consequence. \nHaving been on the waterfront, I know what we are talking about. Madam Speaker, this \nBill gives hope to humanity and Mauritius. It shows that as global capitalism unravelled, it \nalso generated its own contradictions that is, the rise of global people’s movement for social \njustice and ecological justice. It generates the very seeds to challenge its dominance and build \nnew world with shifting paradigms. Rezistans ek Alternativ, my party and me, are proud to be \nin this House and to vote for this Bill. \nToday is a historical day because not only because of a change in seating arrangements. \nIt is a historical day because of the piece of legislation that we will be enacting in a few \nmoments. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, let me tell everybody. I have got hon. Boolell, hon. Bhagwan \nand hon. Mohamed, Ministers who will have to speak and then the hon. Minister of Financial \nServices will be making her winding up speech. I would greatly appreciate if you could really \nrespect the time because after that, we have to do Committee Stage. I have a statement from a \nhon. Minister. We are not home yet, please! \nHon. Dr. Boolell! I did not want to embarrass you. \n(5.38 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries (Dr. \nA. Boolell): Thank you very much, Madam Speaker. The joy of having to intervene after two \neloquent speakers – the hon. Prime Minister and our good friend, the hon. Minister of Social \nSecurity, there is not much left for me to say except that I will stick to the time allotted to me. \nI am not saying that I will be like a jurisdiction without substance but I have a few \nthings to say. Now, the days, Madam Speaker, of preferences and rent seeking are over. \nFinancial services sectors, competitive. As a responsible government acting as an enabler, a \nfacilitator of a dynamic sector which is brain gain for young ambitious graduates, we \nconstantly have to re-engineer the sector and to gain competitive and comparative advantages \n– our jurisdiction has to be neat, clean and a jurisdiction of substance. \nSingapore, Luxembourg, Malta, Liechtenstein, Bermuda, Dubai, Ireland just to name a \nfew – would not hesitate to ruffle our feathers to have a competitive edge – make Mauritius \nour preferred destination is our mantra. And, the financial services thrive in the name of \neffectiveness, transparency and accountability. \nThe hon. Minister responsible for financial services and economic planning wasted no \ntime to move 24 amendments of the Bill as recommended by the Ministerial Committee co-\nchaired by herself and the hon. Attorney General. And the amendments were moved 24 hours \nafter the Bank of Mauritius announced the termination of the conservatorship of Silver Bank \nand the Bill is the gatekeeper of our jurisdiction. As a jurisdiction of substance, we should not \nbe caught off the cuff – I am not going to say with our pants down but certainly not off-the-\ncuff. \nOur Financial Services Centre has taken the rung of the FATF ladder and within a year, \nas the hon. Prime Minister stated, has gained eight places. The Chief Executive of Financial \nServices Commission is confident; our jurisdiction would pass the ESAAMLG test with \nflying colours. \nMay I remind the House, Mauritius was placed on the FATF grey list and black list of \nEU in February 2020. On the global financial index, Mauritius went on a precipitous fall \nfrom 63rd to 89th place. Why? Because MSM-led regime was a laundromat for criminals to \nwash, rinse, dry and spin-dry dirty money. \nThe hon. Minister rightly so, and has to be congratulated because she conveyed strong \nsignals in relations to – \n(i) \nKnow Your Client and customer due diligence is the premium of the sector; \n(ii) \nsuspicious transaction reporting; \n(iii) application of law to the core; \n(iv) and open and resilient jurisdiction; \n(v) \nconfidence and integrity. \nI would also like to draw attention to alleged online attractive portfolio to lure investors \nand no one Madam Speaker, should be impervious or sensitive to change, especially to \nfundamental changes. \nI heard a good colleague, the hon. Minister of Social Security, talking of ecocide. In \n2019, the Rome statue was amended to make ecocide an international crime but the previous \nregime never dared. The amendment brought to the Environment Act through the Bill is a \ntestimony of affirmed commitment neither to dither nor to delay and the Bill makes provision \nfor scrutiny of cooperative enterprises.  \nA pillar of democracy – that is what cooperatives are. Equality, equity unfortunately \nhas been used as a conduit for criminal activities by cronies of the MSM. The Vacoas \nMultipurpose Cooperative Society scandal was a pillar of big financial mess – almost Rs400 \nmillion was siphoned. It is a broad day light robbery by cronies of MSM. MSM-led regime \nwas eternally in collusion with McMafia, Madam Speaker and McMafia operates all over and \nespecially in the real estate.  Unexplained wealth from dirty money has been invested in \nDubai. The criminals have to be answerable to unexplained wealth order. \nThe hon. Prime Minister has said it, everybody has reinforced it and it has to happen. \nThey cannot get away with murder. Government has taken the right decision to call a \nForensic Audit of Silver Bank’s past transactions. The various fraudulent practices which \noccurred with the connivance of persons within the bank and outside, have been exposed. \nSilver Bank was run by bankster and not by bankers, anointed by the former Minister of \nFinance with the blessings of his leader. The Internal Auditor sounded the alarm in relation to \nillicit activities was threatened. \nMadam Speaker, the singsong of Pack & Blister, Silver Bank, MIC, Alvaro Sobrinho, \nshould not simply be a lullaby. Sobrinho, as the hon. Prime Minister has stated, was \nresponsible for many illicit activities, but he was also responsible for a near constitutional \ncrisis which provoked the departure of a president in 2018. Of course, as has been stated by \nthe hon. Prime Minister, he got a Certificate of Character from the then DPM when the latter \nlooked him in the eyes! \n The hon. Prime Minister has consolidated democracy and there is no price for it. The \ndemarcation lines between democratic institutions are wide. With due respect, both \nprosecution and the Judiciary should know that time is of an essence. Government is \nGovernment, but Parliament is supreme. An important Bill is being moved, Parliament so \ndecides. The nation does not want to be packed with blisters over delays while the guilty \nparties are enjoying armchair comfortability in Maradiva Hotel. A symbol of fraudulent \npractices. \nMadam Speaker, there have been complains made over the rigidity of the Bill by some \noperators. Yes, indeed, and rightly so. If not, our competitors and even MGos would go for \nour jugular. That was to some extent stated by our colleague, the hon. Minister of Social \nSecurity. Oxfam staged a protest against Mauritius at an OAU conference in March 2014, \nheld in Abuja, following the report submitted by Thabo Mbeki as Chair of the High Panel on \nIllicit Financial Flaws. I had to stand for our friend, the then Minister of Finance. I think it \nwas Xavier-Luc Duval, and I had to rebut and highlighted the merits of our jurisdiction as a \nclean, neat and a low tax jurisdiction of substance.  \nThe name of the game under the previous regime was opacity. Pockets first, country \nlast. FATF judged Mauritius to have a low or moderate effectiveness across the 11 immediate \noutcomes. The mutual evaluation found that Mauritius was largely fully compliant on 14 of \nthe 40 Financial Action Task Force recommendations while 26 recommendations were rated \nas partially or non-compliant. \nThe keyword, Madam Speaker, is effectiveness. FATF’s revised methodology places a \nmuch stronger emphasis on measurable effectiveness, not only where the laws exist, but \nwhether they deliver concrete results. The FIU has reporting obligation. The legislative \namendments in 2020 enforce stricter reporting, requiring reporting persons or auditors to \nsubmit requested information to the Financial Intelligence Unit within 15 days. But under the \nprevious regime, it was hardly enforced.  \nOur Government, through the hon. Minister of Financial Services and Economic \nPlanning, has said it loud and clear, without fear, favour or prejudice, all suspicious related \ntransactions have to be reported.  \nTo be forward-looking, Government has finalised the National Anti-Money Laundering, \nCombatting Financing Terrorism Strategy for 2026-2029. The accompanying action plan \nassigns clear responsibilities to each institution and ensures preparedness for the 2027 mutual \nevaluation. This approach was recognised and supported during ESAAMLG Executive \nSecretary’s High-Level Mission in July 2025.  \nA comprehensive technical compliance assessment was conducted in 2025 using the \nrevised FATF methodology to identify legislative gaps, particularly in relation to the 12 \nrecommendations leading to the introduction of the Anti-Money Laundering, Combatting the \nFinancing of Terrorism and Countering Proliferation Financing (Miscellaneous) Bill to ensure \ncontinued alignment with international standards. Preparations for 2027 mutual evaluation \nare well underway. These reforms are not being pursued for the sake of only an assessment. \nThey are essential to safeguard the integrity of our financial system, protect Mauritius’ \nreputation and ensure continued investor confidence. \nMadam Speaker, our status as a trusted International Financial Centre must be \npreserved through collective effort by government, regulators, private sector and the civil \nsociety. This Bill reaffirms our collective determination to deny criminals the opportunity to \nexploit Mauritius, to recover illicit gains and to preserve the integrity of our institutions. It \nconfronts contemporary threats, including proliferation financing and virtual asset, while \npreserving space for legitimate economic and charitable activity. \nMadam Speaker, in the light of climate of uncertainty in the Middle East, it is an \nopportunity which is knocking for our jurisdiction. We have to act without fear or prejudice \nto ensure that we attract investors to widen the circle of opportunities in Mauritius and to \nmake our jurisdiction a prime jurisdiction.  \nThe amendments in relation to the Bill speak volume of opportunities which are \nknocking. I thank the hon. Minister. Thank you very much. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Thank you for respecting the time. Thank you very \nmuch. \nHon. Minister of Environment!  \n(5.52 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change (Mr \nR. Bhagwan): Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Will you also keep an eye on time? \nMr Bhagwan: I will try my best. \nMadam Speaker: You will also keep an eye. \nMr Bhagwan: I will watch the time. \nMadame la présidente, l’Anti-Money Laundering, Combatting the Financing of \nTerrorism and Countering Proliferation Financing (Miscellaneous) Bill, c’est une nécessité \nabsolue pour le pays et il n’y a pas de temps à perdre.  \nJe voudrais d’amblée féliciter mes collègues, l’honorable ministre des Services \nfinanciers et l’honorable Attorney General et leurs équipes respectives pour le travail abattu \npour préparer ce projet de loi qui vise à mettre toutes les lois régissant notre système financier \nen diapason avec les nouvelles normes internationales. Ce qui a été dit déjà. Une nécessité \nparce que les dérives et les magouilles sous l’ancien régime – nous ne cesserons jamais d’en \nparler – ont terni la réputation de notre centre financier et nous nous sommes retrouvés sur le \nbanc des accusés.  \nCe projet de loi vise avant tout, Madame la présidente, à redonner confiance en nos \ninstitutions financières et bancaires, et surtout, à minimiser les risques d’abus et les dérives. \nUn système financier, Madame la présidente, est un peu comme le passeport d’un pays. À \nquoi bon avoir un passeport superbement imprimé, mais qui n’est reconnu que par une petite \npoignée d’états ? Un passeport trouve sa légitimité quand il est internationalement reconnu, \naccepté et permet au détenteur de ce document de voyager librement aux quatre coins du \nmonde. C’est dans l’acceptation de ce passeport que la souveraineté d’un état est reconnue. Et \ncette souveraineté, comme le passeport, n’a aucun sens en l’absence de réciprocité. \nEn effet, Madame la présidente, la souveraineté et la réciprocité sont les deux piliers \nfondamentaux de nos relations internationales du droit. Un demi-siècle de cela, ce principe \nétait adéquat, suffisant pour être accepté dans le Conseil des nations. Mais les choses ont \névolué drastiquement avec la mondialisation, la globalisation et la financiarisation de \nl’économie. Le commerce international a atteint en 2024, 3 300 milliards de dollars, \nreprésentant 60% du PIB mondial. Et ce commerce mondial dépend énormément des services \nfinanciers devenus eux-mêmes un élément très important des exportations.  \nCe vaste mouvement de capitaux à travers le monde comporte évidemment des risques \net les fraudeurs sont nombreux quand les contrôles sont insuffisants. L’offshores, avec ses \nsociétés écrans et ses montages complexes, est devenu un terrain de prédilection pour les \nwhite collar criminals. \nMadam Speaker: Prédilection. \nMr Bhagwan: Oui, prédilection. \nC’est ainsi que notre petite île était devenue une plaque tournante sous le précédent \nrégime. Des Panama Papers en 2016 au Pandora Papers en 2021, en passant par les Mauritian \nLeaks ou autres Paradise Papers, la réputation de notre pays était ternie et le pays s’est \nretrouvé sur des listes peu honorables. Des impostes, des fenêtres et des égouts permettaient \nces transactions douteuses avec la complicité tacite des institutions réduites à des rubber \nstamps complaisants. Les autorités dites compétentes fermaient les yeux, pire, encourageaient \nces activités illicites, éclaboussant même des personnalités au plus haut sommet de l’État \nmauricien. Mes collègues et moi-même, nous avons posé pas mal de questions avant les \nélections générales et nous savions comment ce loudspeaker qui nous empêchait d’avoir des \nréponses. \nLe pays lui-même était devenu une Silver Bank, une BanyanTree Bank – un rogue \nState. Le smoking gun, Madame la présidente, était entre les mains des grosses pontes du \nMSM. Il faut impérativement mettre de l’ordre dans nos lois régissant les secteurs bancaires \net financiers pour se mettre enfin en conformité avec les normes internationales. Pour que le \npays ne soit plus sur la touche. Pour que notre souveraineté, sur tous les plans, bénéficie \nd’une réciprocité des États et de nos partenaires pour que notre passeport financier devient \nréellement un passepartout. Et c’est donc ce pilier fondamental dans nos échanges \ninternationaux que ce projet de loi vient consolider. \nCe projet de loi est, en substance, un texte qui permettra à Maurice de se conformer à la \ndernière série de normes internationales établies par le GAFI. Par l’adoption de ce projet de \nloi, nous renforcerons notre cadre juridique afin d’éviter que notre pays ne soit inscrit sur la \nliste grise des juridictions du GAFI. \nMadame la présidente, bien que la République de Maurice dispose jusqu’en 2027 pour \nse conformer aux 40 recommandations formulées par le GAFI, notre pays fait l’objet d’un \nsuivi étroit et nous avons le devoir de faire de notre mieux et vite pour démontrer des progrès \nconcrets année après année. Il n’est pas nécessaire de rappeler aux membres de cette \nAssemblée, à nos amis, les dangers liés à un non-respect des recommandations – des \nconséquences économiques, financières désastreuses et une image écornée pour la \nRépublique de Maurice. Dans ce contexte de tensions géopolitiques et de marges de \nmanœuvre budgétaires limitées, notre pays ne peut tout simplement pas se permettre de \nprendre le moindre risque de figurer sur cette liste grise. \nMadame la présidente, les recommandations du GAFI exigent que les infractions de \nblanchiment d’argent s’appliquent à un éventail le plus large possible d’infractions. C’est \ndans ce contexte, le GAFI a explicitement souligné que les crimes environnementaux \nconstituent des infractions graves générant des produits susceptibles d’alimenter les \nopérations de blanchiment d’argent. Selon le Global Risks Report 2023 du Forum \néconomique mondial, la perte de biodiversité et l’effondrement des écosystèmes figurent \nparmi les risques mondiaux qui se détérioreront le plus rapidement au cours de la prochaine \ndécennie. À l’échelle mondiale, la nature « faible risque et forte rentabilité » des crimes \nenvironnementaux en fait une source de revenus lucrative pour les criminels. Ne croyez pas, \nMadame la présidente, que nous sommes à l’abri de telles pratiques. En effet, alors que \ncertains pensent encore que le blanchiment d’argent est une affaire abstraite de chiffres et de \ncomptes offshores, une réalité circule dans des tuyaux en PVC, remplis d’oiseaux vivants, \nanesthésiés pour tromper la vigilance. Oui, des serins siffleurs, jusqu’à 75 par tube PVC, \néchangés contre de la drogue, au cœur d’un trafic organisé entre Maurice et la Réunion. \nDerrière chaque oiseau, c’est un système criminel qui prospère, qui blanchit et qui corrompt. \nD’ailleurs, ce trafic, où un oiseau peut valoir plus de R 18 000, a été largement abordé \ndurant le Séminaire Franco-Mauricien relative à la Lutte transnationale contre les atteintes à \nl’environnement, tenu à l’île-sœur au début du mois et auquel a participé la police de \nl’Environnement et d’autres parties prenantes mauriciennes. Ce trafic n’est pas marginal, il \nest le symptôme d’un crime organisé, inventif, cynique, capable de transformer la \nbiodiversité en monnaie d’échange. Alors oui, Madame la présidente, cette loi doit frapper \nfort. Elle doit remonter les filières, assécher les flux financiers et briser les complicités. \nD’ailleurs, les rapports des Nations unies placent désormais les revenus issus des \ncrimes environnementaux au même niveaux que ceux provenant d’autres crimes financiers \ngraves. À travers ce projet de loi, nous prenons des mesures pour que ceux qui tirent profit de \nla destruction de nos terres, de notre air et de nos mers soient tenus responsables de leurs \nactes. Il convient de noter que les « crimes environnementaux » englobent différentes réalités. \nIls incluent l’extraction illégale ou le trafic de divers éléments, qu’il s’agisse de ressources \nnaturelles et de minéraux, de déchets ou encore d’espèces de la faune et de la flore protégées. \nIls concernent également des actes susceptibles d’entrainer des dommages graves, étendus ou \ndurables à l’environnement, tels que des marées noires majeures ou des activités nuisibles ou \nillégales affectant la faune sauvage. \nMadame la présidente, pour lutter efficacement contre ces crimes, nous devons \nrenforcer notre arsenal législatif. À cet effet, ce projet de loi introduit des amendements \ncorrélatifs spécifiques aux articles 128 et 135 de l’Environment Protection Act 2024. Dans un \npremier temps, de nouvelles dispositions seront introduites afin de sanctionner ceux qui se \nsoustraient délibérément au paiement de la redevance de l’Environmental Protection Fee. Les \nnouvelles dispositions comprendront notamment – \n• \nLa criminalisation de la soumission de fausses déclarations et d’informations \nerronées ; \n• \nL’imposition de sanctions significatives à l’encontre de ceux qui induisent ou \ntentent d’induire en erreur le Directeur général de la MRA ; \n• \nUne augmentation substantielle des peines pour les contrevenants condamnés, \navec en plus d’amendes comprises entre R 100 000 et R 500 000 et d’une peine \nd’emprisonnement pouvant aller jusqu’à 10 ans, et la possibilité pour la Cour \nd’ordonner le paiement d’un montant pouvant atteindre le double de la différence \ndes sommes dues. \nMadame la présidente, à la suite de consultations avec le bureau du Directeur des poursuites \npubliques et celui de l’Attorney General, nous intégrons de nouvelles dispositions à \nl’Environment Protection Act 2024 relatives à l’écocide. \nMadam Speaker, our pride as Mauritians – whatever community we belong to, \nwhatever political ideologies, whatever religious beliefs we might have, and whatever our age \n– is our unique environment. Our environment – our beaches, seas, mountains, fields, trees or \nbirds – is something we all cherish. We all have fond memories of afternoons spent at the \nseaside or walks in our forests or hikes up our mountains. And we all know that our \nenvironment is fragile. We all remember, a few years ago, how the Wakashio incident deeply \naffected all of us. More importantly, it made us realise how vulnerable we all were. The \nimmediate reaction of all Mauritians was then commendable. Still, we can remember the \ncontribution of Rezistans ek Alternativ and all the friends of Eco-Sud and others. Across the \nisland, people volunteered their time, and, some of us, even their hair to try to contain the \nnoxious marée noire. \n Madam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Bhagwan: Again, this shows how dear the environment is to all of us Mauritians. \nQuite a lot of laws in Mauritius do offer protection against all categories of violence against \npeople. \nMauritius mare noir, again this shows how dear the environment is to all of us, \nMauritians. Quite a lot of laws in Mauritius do offer protection against all categories of \nviolence against people. Sadly, violence, whether wilful or negligent against our \nenvironment, is not adequately criminalised. The existing laws, at best, only marginally \npunish those who harm nature. Existing offences against our environment are not even \nconsidered as a crime in our statutes but only as a misdemeanour. This has to change. This \nlaw, creating the crime of ecocide, changes that. The crime, inspired by growing global \nmovement, led by small island nations, is crafted in such a way as to capture all possible \nharms against nature.  \nThere will be no more legal loopholes and no more impunity. It targets unlawful or \nwanton acts causing severe widespread or long-term environmental damage. The punishment \nis extremely severe. Those found guilty risk a maximum of ten years imprisonment.  \nAnother novelty is that there is no maximum fine. Instead, the fine will be \nproportionate to the damage caused. The law also provides for remedial actions or \ncompensation. The law, Madam Speaker, ensures accountability for environmental \ndisruption, deters against future harm, protects human lives and aligns our country with the \nFATF expectations.   \nLastly, this crime aligns itself with a promise this Government made which prominently \nfeatures within the Government Programme 2025-2029 – to recognise the importance of our \nenvironment and protect it. I am here focusing on the inclusion of the right of nature within \nthe constitutional and legal frameworks of the Republic of Mauritius. Pending the work of the \nConstitutional Review Commission, the consequential amendments proposed by the currently \nBill are a step taken towards mainstreaming the rights of nature within our legal fabric, \nespecially by criminalising ecocide.  \nWe, however, recognise that environment protection duties are shared amongst various \ninstitutions. Indeed, technical competences and enforcement duties are shared across various \nauthorities as described within the Fifth Schedule of the Environment Act 2024. While the \nOffice of the DPP will lead prosecution of offenders, we are ensuring a whole of government \napproach where technical competences from competent authorities are integrated within our \njudicial process. We are aware of potential logistical challenges such as the need for \nspecialised experts to assess environmental damage. These will be duly called upon if the \nneed arises. However, the United Nations Environment Programme advocates technical \nhurdles should not serve as an excuse for environmental impunity. The planetary crisis \nrequires us to be bold.  \nMadame la présidente, mais aussi collective, vigilante et citoyenne, c’est précisément le \nsens du programme ‘Service à L’écologie’ qui sera bientôt lancé par mon ministère. Notre \nambition est de fédérer à travers toute l’île des éco pôles rassemblement des experts, \nformateurs, mentors, professionnels, retraités, académiciens, chercheurs et citoyens engagés \npour créer un véritable réseau d’alerte de transmission d’actions sur le terrain, au plus près de \nréalité.  \nJ’appelle donc, à chaque citoyen, engageons-nous à faire émerger une société \nmauricienne lucide, formée, mobilisée, capable de détecter, dénoncer et de protéger. Un pays \noù chacun, Madame la présidente, devient gardien de l’environnement et de sa biodiversité. \nMadame la présidente, ce projet de loi ne concerne pas uniquement la conformité \nfinancière, il touche à l’âme-même de notre état océan d’une superficie de 2.3 millions de \nkilomètres carrés. J’envoie un message clair – notre capital environnemental n’est pas à \nvendre. Les braconniers et les autres criminels qui cherchent à tirer profit de sa destruction ne \ndormiront plus tranquille. \nMadame la présidente, ce projet de loi est un grand pas pour la mise en conformité de \nnotre system financier mais un plus grand pas pour la protection de notre capital \nenvironnemental. \nSur ce, je soutiens vivement ce projet qu’a présenté mon collègue.  \nMadam Speaker : Merci, monsieur le ministre d’avoir respecté le temps.  \nHon. Minister for Housing and Lands! \n(6.10 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Housing and Lands (Mr S. Mohamed): Thank you, Madam \nSpeaker.  \nIndeed, it is an important piece of legislation, and from the very outset, I also, would \nlike to congratulate the hon. Minister for bringing this piece of legislation to this House.  \nAs far as my Ministry is concerned, we are to refer to Clause 18 of the present Bill, that \ntalks about the Real Estate Agency Authority. And, what I would like to address, I am of the \nview, is of utmost importance. Having listened to everyone, every single person has made a \nvery important contribution to this democratic process but allow me at the outset to make \nreference to the interesting exchange at the time that the hon. Prime Minister was addressing \nthe House and in front of him was the hon. A Duval. Mention was made of recordings, audio \nrecordings and I saw how comforted hon. A. Duval was when he said, from a sitting position, \nall of us heard him said that he was himself victim of those recordings. Fact. Very true.  \nThe hon. Prime Minister also talked about the former Commissioner of Police. Once \nagain, I looked at my good friend, hon. A. Duval, and saw the smile on his face where, once \nagain, he tried to explain that he has been victim of the acts and doings of certain people at \nthe time but what shocks me, apart from the fact that I am sad and that he is not here right \nnow, but what is even more saddening, Madam Speaker, is that he chose, knowingly, to side \nwith those that were spying on him.   \nNow what does that show?  I fail to understand, I mean, I would have huge difficulties \nsitting next to those who have championed the cause of spying unlawfully, … \n(Interruptions) \nThat has nothing to do with spy, I can assure you because a spy would have been quiet.  \nMadam Speaker: This happens but try and keep it quiet.  \nMr Mohamed: So, I fail to understand how he could do that. I mean, I wish he could, \nat some stage, explain and tell the people and the House how has he put that aside because, at \nno time, did I hear anyone from the former regime apologise. At no time did I hear the Leader \nof the Opposition whom he sits shoulder-to-shoulder say –  \n“Sorry, I did not know but I condemn what was happening.” \nAt no time, have we heard any member of the MSM condemned the fact that there was \nsuch unlawful behaviour from those at the very top of our executive in those days but then, \nwe have also heard about the whole issue of Álvaro Sobrinho. True. Once again, hon. A. \nDuval, in a sitting position, said – \n“Not Assirvaden, I am the one who brought it up.” \nGood for you and true it is, I did hear him bring it up. True it is that, the then Leader of \nthe Opposition, who was Xavier Duval, did also question the Prime Minister of the day on \nthat particular issue. There was crossing of swords between the Prime Minister of the day and \nthe Leader of the Opposition and there was hon. Collendavelloo who was sitting there in a \nvery squared position feeling so proud of himself. I remember those days.  \nBut then again, how is it that hon. A. Duval, not only him, but his whole party sat \nshoulder-to-shoulder with those who supported Álvaro Sobrinho? \nHow did he stand on the same electoral platform as the person who said –  \n“ I only get li lizie dan lizie and I gave him a due diligence exercise?” \nHow could he do that? How could you forgive? How could you forget so easily?  \nToday, you want to take the position, your high moral position of supposedly \nrepresenting the right side? But you should always choose the right side of history. You \nshould believe in those positions that you adopt. You should believe and act accordingly!  \nIt is sad because my good friend, hon. Adrien Duval, has chosen to forget the moral of \nthe ground or has a different definition than I have. I shall deal with it at the end of my \nintervention.  \nMadam Speaker, to come to this legislation, clause 18, let me say it is necessary to \nunderstand how we have arrived at the current state of play in real estate sector. Back in \n2018, ESAAMLG Mutual Evaluation Report highlighted a very important fact, let me quote \nthis.  \nI quote – \n“Mauritius does not have a specific legislation which requires real estate agents to be \nregistered. The only requirement is that anyone wishing to operate this business must \nobtain a general business registration certificate. \nOn the other hand, with respect to real estate agents and dealers in precious stones, \nthere are no specific measures in place to prevent criminals and their associates from \nentering the market and being beneficial owners or holding a management function in \nthis sector.” \nThe vulnerability rating from the 2019 National Risk Assessment was thus high (high in \nbold and underline). What did the government-of-the day then do? Despite the shortcomings \nidentified in ESAAMLG, no credible action was undertaken by the then government across \nall sectors. As a result, we were eventually placed on the FATF Grey List and also on the EU \nBlack List.  \nThis is what the hon. Leader of the Opposition pretends not to remember or not to \nknow. He puts that aside as though it never happened. He tries to rewrite history, but this is \nthe truth. He cannot run away from that truth. So, the Real Estate Agency Authority Act was \nenacted in 2020 to establish a dedicated authority for real estate sector, with a view to both \nregulating the activities of the real estate agents, including developers and promoters. \nI will try to explain as I go along why this is of utmost importance. So, what did the \ngovernment do? I have a document which is Proclamation No. 10 of 2020. I have it here, \nsigned by the President of the Republic of the Day. So, the Act comes into force as from 01 \nNovember 2020. Sections 1 to 11 are proclaimed. Sections 17, 20, 33, 41, 43, 45 and 47 are \nproclaimed, but the other sections of the law are not proclaimed. Therein I start putting \nquestions. The whole idea is to clean up the sector to ensure that we comply with what we \nhave to comply with, to ensure that there is monitoring, that there is surveillance, supervision, \nand that we comply with the law, that we are a clean jurisdiction, at least, in that particular \nsector. \nBut why is it that the government-of-the day decides not to proclaim those sections? \nWhat are those sections of the law that was not proclaimed? Section 16 was not proclaimed. \nWhy? This concerns registration requirements. Section 18 was not proclaimed. It concerns \nthe establishment of a register of real estate agents. Why? Section 19 – mandatory written \ncontracts between real estate agents and their clients – contracts, mandatory entre les clients \nand the estate agents –, why was that not proclaimed? Why was there, therefore, the need, \nMadam Speaker, to create a situation where there was no need for a mandatory written \ncontract between real estate agents and clients? \nWho did they try to protect? What did they try to hide? What were the transactions that \nwere about to take place when they were in power? And they could not, therefore, afford to \nproclaim that very section! What were they hiding? Section 21 – keeping of accounts and \naudit provisions. What was so difficult to ensure that accounts and audit provisions were \ncomplied with?  \nSections 23 and 24 – c’est la folie – suspicious transactions reporting and AML/CFT \nbreaches. That is what we are here for. That is what the hon. Minister is working for. That is \nwhy the co-chair, the hon. Attorney General, is there working and helping us to achieve. Why \nwas it do difficult? Why did they not at least try to proclaim Sections 23 and 24 pertaining to \nsuspicious transactions reporting and AML/CFT breaches? What were they trying to hide?  \nI wish they would at least come out and tell us the truth. The hon. Leader of the \nOpposition representing the rot, the rot, that is, the MSM, has chosen to be absent again. And \nhis partner, shoulder to shoulder with him, is also absent today! \nKeep on spying on me, he says. Keep on listening to what I have to say. I shall say I am \nnot happy with what you are doing, but I will sit next to you and I will espouse your \npositions. This is what he is saying! Is it a coincidence that they choose not to be here today \ntogether? So, I say it again: Sections 25 to 32, why were they not proclaimed? Disciplinary \nframework for professionals’ misconduct and review of decision by the authority. \nMadam Speaker, Section 44, Offences and Penalties, was not proclaimed. Section 46 \nthe Transitional Provisions for existing practitioners was not proclaimed. If you want to have \nthe secret recipe as to how to create a bulldog sans dent – this is the masters of it – is the one \nwho represents the MSM, who had as Prime Minister someone who is guilty of all those \noffences in my view. Because it is an offence against the nation not to proclaim.  \nIt is an offence against the people of this country to put us in a situation of risk again in \nthe name of protecting who and in the name of hiding what? That is the question. So, what is \nthe point, therefore, of having created the authority? To pay people to sit in there and do \nnothing?  \nMadam Speaker, what is the objective of this government? For one thing, it is not to \nreplicate the mess, but to create a situation where we wipe the mock that they have left \nbehind for us. We have to wipe it clean. The Real Estate Authority has to be empowered to \ninvestigate. That, they did not want. We have to ensure, and we are doing it. We have to \nensure that the authority can conduct disciplinary proceedings, impose sanctions, control the \nregister and prosecute. They did not want that. \nYou see, Madam Speaker, the amendments in clause 18, since 2025, we have done \neverything possible to ensure that the Real Estate Authority becomes operational as soon as \npossible. Most of the remaining sections of that Act will now be proclaimed once we are done \nwith this Bill and it becomes a law so that registrations can be effected. It will be in action \nonce the relevant sections of the Act are amended as per the miscellaneous provisions. \nIt will empower the authority to adopt a look through approach, meaning the authority \nwill not only ensure that agents are properly registered, but also that employees of agents who \ncarry out agency work adhere to minimum standards – the very standards that the MSM did \nnot want to hear of. \nIt is unfortunate that there is no legislation that can enable any government to prosecute \nthose who have caused a crime against the nation because this, is incompetence, but this, is \ncriminal negligence. Furthermore, the Bill will now extend the AML/CFT compliance \nobligations to State institutions for real estate transactions on a risk sensitive basis. \nMadam Speaker, the way forward. We will finally have a proper register of agency \nincluding developers and promoters, allowing for proper entry screening to ensure that only \nindividuals with a proper track record may operate within the sector. Can you imagine, \nMadam Speaker, that some of the sections that were not proclaimed – and I say so, \npurposefully, knowingly, – were sections between 25 and 32. The Act sets a clear framework \nto sanction misconduct, dishonesty, gross negligence, misuse of another real estate agent’s \ninformation, failure to produce record, false statements, misrepresentations of ownership, \nacting without consent, accepting secret commissions, and acquiring interest on property \nwithout disclosure. So, they did not want all of this transparency. They were allergic to it! \nAnd this is precisely what we will not do again. This will put them, not only their \nwrongdoing, belongs to the past but we are, therefore, obliged, duty-bound to ensure that this \ndoes not happen again. \nMadam Speaker, you see why I am so passionate about this. I will say so. \nMadam Speaker: I can see. \nMr Mohamed: Because I am aware as Minister that there are many properties \nbelonging to the State that was given out by the former regime. You know, many people \ntoday say, there is almost no State Land available on our coastline, on the beaches. True! \nWhy? Because the former regime finn dilapid tou. Inn done. Dal mo done doub. Tou inn \ndone. \nMadam Speaker: I can see creole is getting on. \n(Interruptions) \nMr Mohamed: You see, when gave it all out and I know for a fact that many of those \nproperties were developed. The question is how many of those people’s friends to whom they \ngave State Lands to develop in order to become millionaires, billionaires overnight? How \nmany of them have registered at the authority when they could not have done it because it \nwas not proclaimed in the law? How many would have had to have contracts between their \nclients’ agents? How many of those promoters would have had to have written contracts? \nThen clearly, cannot, and will not, because they were not obliged to have it because the law \nwas not proclaimed. How many billions of rupees have been really made sur le dos des \ncontribuables? And how many of those billions have been siphoned off outside the country? \nThat is my question! And then, they tried to bring their heads out from under the stone. They \ntried to pretend to be cleaner and holier than thou – paragons of virtue. \nMadam Speaker, I would like to say that we have been left with a with a Herculean \ntask. It is not easy to clean up the mess. The easy part is making the mess without even \nthinking of tomorrow because this was their attitude. They did not think that they had think of \ntomorrow. They just made the mess. That was the easy part. \nNow creating confidence in institutions, ensuring that institutions work independently, \nensuring that each of those institutions are given the right resources, capacity building, \nmonitoring ability, enforcing ability, supervision ability, all this, it is for us to do. So, the \nwork is for those who believe honestly in change that we will do it. They can go out there and \npretend that they are, as I said, they are cleaner and they are the champions of the truth, but in \nfact, they are exactly the opposite. Now, let me conclude to say. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nMr Mohamed: I congratulate the hon. Leader of the Opposition for his absence. I \ncongratulate his hon. friend sitting next to him shoulder to shoulder for his absence, but I \nheartily congratulate the hon. Quirin who is here because he is true to himself and he is \npresent. \n(Interruptions) \nI, therefore, once again, ask everyone in this House to congratulate the hon. Minister \nfor the excellent piece of work, together with her officers, that she has produced, and the \nofficers of the hon. Attorney General’s Office in the drafting of this legislation. \nThank you very much. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you so much. \nYes, hon. Minister. That was a mouthful. Up to you now! \n(6.31 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Financial Services & Economic Planning (Dr. Ms J. Jeetun): \nMadam Speaker, let me thank the hon. Members from both sides of the House for their \nvaluable comments and appreciation of this important Bill. Because important it is, Madam \nSpeaker. Important not only in its own right but as a matter of national interest. And this is \nwhy I wish to put on record my appreciation to all the hon. Members for their support of this \nBill. \nMadam Speaker, let it be clear, money laundering, terrorism financing and proliferation \nfinancing are not merely regulatory concerns. They are fundamentally matters of national \nsecurity. Illicit financial flows fuel organised crime, sustain drug trafficking networks, \nentrench corruption, and in more severe instances facilitate acts of terrorism or proliferation \nof weapons of mass destruction. \nMadam Speaker, this Bill is comprehensive in scope and transformational in effect. As \nwe conclude our deliberations to that, I will address the concerns raised and set out the \nsafeguards, implementation roadmap and expected outcomes of this legislation placing these \nmeasures in both national and international context.  \nAllow me to reassure the House that this important piece of legislation, amending no \nless than 23 pieces of legislation, reflects a structured and progressive legislative process \naligned with national and international obligations. This Bill is a strategic response to an \nevolving global and economic environment. Since our removal from the FATF’s Increased \nMonitoring list in October 2021 the FATF standards and methodology have continued to \nevolve to meet increasingly sophisticated financial crimes and emerging risks, and ever since \nthis Government took place, we have been continuously assessing and updating our exposure \nto those risks. \nThe hon. Prime Minister just elaborated the work being done by the 16 competent \nauthorities, by the Core Group, by the National Committee, by the Interministerial \nCommittee, under the oversight of the hon. Prime Minister himself, and the Cabinet. \nThe whole thing commences with the publication of the National Risk Assessment \nReport in May 2025 which, let me remind the House, was due since 2022 as the NRA is \nmeant to be published every three years and the last one was published in 2019. In the 2025, \nNRA report, technical compliance gaps were identified to the FATF standards. Reforms to \nstrengthen the AML/CFT framework in preparation for the ESAAMLG mutual evaluation \nwere also announced as far back as the last Budget 2025/2026. Works have been ongoing \nsince then to ensure that the drafting of this Bill, as well as consultations have been going on. \nThese processes give a clear indication that the work on preparation and readiness of the \nmutual evaluation never stopped.  \nI said this, Madam Speaker, because during the past few months, it has been said \nrepeatedly and publicly that Mauritius has been at major risk of going on the grey list and the \nhon. Prime Minister also referred to that. Not only was this narrative repeated over and over \nagain, bringing or trying to bring our government to disrepute, as if we were sitting and doing \nnothing but more gravely and more seriously, it has been putting the reputation of our country \nat risk, creating a fear factor and scaring investors. This has been nothing but irresponsible \nbehaviour. \n We must sustainably assess evolving risks to keep our international financial centre \nsafe, secure and reputable. These assessments inform our legislative amendments, which in \nturn, provide necessary safeguards to our financial system. The 2025 NRA delivers a clear \nactionable diagnosis. It identified risks or operational realities as recent high-profile \ninvestigations and asset seizures have shown, whether through misuse of GBCs, complex \ntrust structures, layering via cross-border transfers or exploitation of cash intensive sectors. \nThe patterns of abuse demand faster, smarter and more integrated responses.  \nMadam Speaker, this Government has been proactive. Not only have our regulatory \nauthorities strengthened AML/CFT supervision and improved compliance culture among \nstakeholders but we are also introducing the necessary changes ahead of the mutual \nevaluation to ensure that no sector under FATF purview remains exposed or under-\nsupervised. These reforms are designed to ensure Mauritius aligns with international \nstandards and is fully prepared for the forthcoming mutual evaluation.  \nMadam Speaker, allow me now to address specific concerns raised during proceedings. \nSection 68A, Investigative Powers – concerns were raised about the speed at which the \nFinancial Crimes Commission may request account information by email and the perceived \nremoval of judicial oversight. It is important to emphasise that this measure is not a new \nunchecked power. The provision is carried forward from the repealed Asset Recovery Act. \nBefore any request is made, the Commission must satisfy a three-part test – \n(i) \nReasonable grounds to suspect criminal property; \n(ii) \nThat the information is of substantial value to the investigation, and \n(iii) That the request is in the public interest. \nThese three statutory thresholds are meaningful safeguards designed to prevent \narbitrary use of this power while enabling timely investigations into proceeds of crime. \nSection 56, FCC Police Investigation Coordination – questions were asked about \npotential overlap between the FCC and the Independent Police Complaints Commission and \nwhether cross-investigations erodes independence. The framework already existed but has \nbeen strengthened to close gaps and bolster accountability. Cross-investigation protocols are \ndesigned precisely to avoid conflicts of interest. The FCC investigates Police officers to \nprevent Police self-investigation and the Police investigates FCC officers where appropriate. \nThis reciprocal arrangement preserves impartiality, protects integrity and sustains public \nconfidence.  \nProperty of Corresponding Value and Protection of Third Parties – concerns were raised \nthat the definition of “property of corresponding value” might sweep in innocent third parties. \nThe statute explicitly protects Bonafide purchases. Paragraphs in the definition exclude \nproperty held by Bonafide third parties. The law is therefore targeted at knowing participants \nin financial crimes, not innocent third parties who acquire assets in good faith.  \nThe FCC guidelines ‘shall’ versus ‘may’ – concerns were expressed about the wording \nof the FCC guidelines using ‘may’ while the statute uses ‘shall’. Let me clarify the matter to \nthe hon. Member on the other side of the House who has raised this concern. The statutory \nobligation remains binding. Legal persons shall put in place adequate procedures to prevent \nfinancial crime. Guidelines, by contrast, are illustrative and discretionary instruments. They \noutline acceptable means of compliance, reflect international best practice and assist entities \nin designing risk appropriate controls. The permissive language in guidance preserves \nflexibility for diverse businesses while the ‘shall’ in statute preserves the unambiguous legal \nduty to have effective procedures. Responsibility for sufficiency test rests with the legal \nperson. The guidelines are complementary tools, not substitutes for the statutory duty. \nNext, the Declaration of Assets, Valuation of Works of Art and Digital Assets – on \nvaluation concerns for work of assets and digital assets, the Declaration of Assets Unit of the \nFCC has a mandate to monitor declarations, to detect unexplained wealth, not to certify \nprecise market values. Declarants are required to declare works of art exceeding Rs500,000 \nwhich balances proportionality and detection of high value concealment. Where declarations \nraise red flags, cases will be referred to the FCC Investigation Division which may engage \nspecialist valuers through expressions of interest to establish market value and support further \ninquiry. \nMadam Speaker, concerns were also raised regarding the exemption from penalty \npayment in cases of voluntary declaration of asset under section 10(3) of the Declaration of \nAssets Act. I believe there is merit in the concern raised and I shall be coming forward with \nan amendment to that provision during the committee stage. The relevant provision regarding \nvoluntary disclosure proposal will be amended to include three binding safeguards – \n(i) \nA strict six-month time limited window for relief after the prescribed deadline; \n(ii) \nExclusion of any person already under investigation for offences under the DOA \nAct from eligibility, and \n(iii) A one-time only application per declarant. \nSo, these measures preserve the incentive for timely compliance while offering limited \ncontrol relief to genuine late filers or administrative oversight. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to the provision regarding cases to be dealt with and I \nquote: “de die in diem”, I shall be coming forward with an amendment during committee \nstage to the effect that the Supreme Court and the Intermediate Court shall proceed \nexpeditiously with the trials, if possible, de die in diem. In other words, it will be up to the \ncourts to decide whether the hearing will be de die in diem.  \nRegarding the concerns of administrative burden, the risk of overreporting and an \nincrease in cost of compliance, Madam Speaker, I acknowledge the concerns raised regarding \nadministrative burden and the potential complexity that may arise due to enactment of these \namendments. I am myself a big champion of striking the right balance between regulatory \ncompliance and ease of doing business. Too much compliance can undermine ease of doing \nbusiness. However, let us be clear, the reputation of Mauritius has no price. The long-term \nbenefits of strengthening our position as a credible and internationally recognised financial \ncentre will far outweigh any short-term compliance cost.  \nThis position is consistent with international best practices and recognises the \ninherently low-risk and private nature of such structures. By adopting a targeted approach, we \nensure that regulatory efforts remain focused where the risks are highest, rather than \nimposing blanket obligations that may unnecessarily burden legitimate and low-risk entities \nsuch as family offices. This not only alleviates compliance costs, but also preserves the \ncompetitiveness and attractiveness of our jurisdiction for investment.  \nMadam Speaker: I am sorry, hon. Minister. It looks as if you got quite a lot to go.  \nDr. Ms Jeetun: I do, yes. I mean another 10 minutes, maybe. \nMadam Speaker: Another 10 minutes! I don’t think so. I think if you go through these \npages, it will take … \nI hate to stop you, but c’est un peu inhumain aussi.  Let us say we go until 7 o’clock. \nLet’s see. We will go until 7 o’clock because we are still… \n(Interruptions) \nHon. Minister, I am sorry.  \nDr. Ms Jeetun: So, let me focus on the amendments that will come at Committee Stage \nbecause I have to explain that.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, because we still have to go through Committee Stage.  \nDr. Ms Jeetun: Yes, let me just do the … \nMadam Speaker: I have a statement, and I also have people who will speak after \nadjournment. So, I don’t know when… \nDr. Ms Jeetun: So, let me focus on explaining why we are proposing some \namendments.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, because I think most of what you have been saying, you have \nsaid it at the beginning when you introduced the Bill, it seems to me.  \nYes, come with the amendments!  \nDr. Ms Jeetun: So, insurance brokers being licensed under Insurance Act fall within \nthe statutory definition of a financial institution for the purposes of FIAMLA. The general \ninsurances businesses do not fall under the definition of activities of financial institution as \ndefined by FATF. As such, their inclusion in the AML/CFT Framework is derived from the \nlegislation itself. The existing definition does not sufficiently distinguish between life and \nnon-life insurance activities. I shall, therefore, come up with an amendment during \nCommittee Stage to remove these activities from the definition of financial institutions under \nFIAMLA.  \nThere was also a remark made by the hon. Leader of the Opposition on unchecked \npower of regulatory authorities under the Bill which, I think, is important that we deal with. \nHence, I would like to remind the House that the mentioned authorities are statutory bodies \nand they are subject to judicial review. So, they have an obligation not to act in accordance to \nthe provision enshrined in empowering legislation, but also reasonably and justly and in \naccordance with the law of natural justice. \nMadam Speaker: Judiciously.   \nDr. Ms Jeetun: Madam Speaker, on the Opposition side, there was also a valuable \nsuggestion made regarding motor vehicle dealers and leasing companies. The hon. Prime \nMinister spoke about it. I just wanted to add that work is going on at our Ministry’s level, at \nthe Ministry of Commerce’s level and at the inter-ministerial level, there is a committee \nworking on that. We will be coming with amendments and proposals to regulate this sector, \nwhich, as we all know, has been or is being used for anti-money laundering.  \nAllow me to deal with two comments. One was the FATF being a colonial style legacy \nwhere countries are coerced into adopting these international rules by developed countries. It \nis important to emphasise that FATF standards apply universally. They are not directed at \ndeveloping countries alone. Every jurisdiction, developed or developing, is subject to the \nsame evaluation framework. In fact, many developed countries have, themselves, faced \nserious scrutiny and periods of enhanced monitoring. There are various examples of countries \nthat have been subjected to that: Iceland, Monaco, British Virgin Islands, etc.  \nI would also like to respond to one important clarification. There was also a comment \nmade regarding the balance between direct tax and indirect tax. It was said that it is not true \nthat the offshore sector is the biggest tax contributor in Mauritius. That is not true. What I had \nsaid in my speech and I always repeat that, and that’s actually proven in an economic impact \nassessment report done by the University of Mauritius last year, which showed that 65% of \ncorporate tax revenue in Mauritius comes from the financial services sector and 34% of the \nPAYE revenue comes from the financial services sector.  \nSo, now, one can argue that the balance of direct and indirect taxes is not right in \nMauritius. I checked with a few other countries. We are quite aligned with some countries. \nBut I agree and we have been campaigning on that that VAT has too much of a burden in our \ncountry. Who pays VAT? It’s the citizens, the people of the country. We have campaigned on \nthat that the economic model, the fundamental model of our country is wrong. \nMadam Speaker, for example, in Mauritius, 30% of our tax revenues are from direct tax \nrevenue from PAYE and corporate tax, and 53% is through indirect tax. For us, of course, we \nwant more direct tax and less pressure on the consumers, so, less indirect tax.  \nBut how do we do that? We are consumption-driven economy. This is where we need \nto change the economic model. We need to come with a production-driven economy. We \nneed more enterprises investing, we need more exporting, and we need more jobs so \ncompanies can pay taxes and employees can pay taxes. That is how we can increase the direct \ntaxes component and reduce the indirect taxes of VAT tax components.  \nSo, Madam Speaker, let me reassure the House that this legislative package is focused \non clear practical goals and guiding principles.  \nLet me skip that, Madam Speaker, because it is going to repeat what I have said and \nmany speakers have said again. So, in the interest of time, I will skip those.  \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Minister, I am sure there will be a lot of opportunities for you, \nin the future, to come back on the very important issues that, obviously, you would like to \ndeal with. \nSo, today, it is the Bill. We have circulated the amendments. Everybody has the \namendments? Okay!  \nDr. Ms Jeetun: Okay. So, let me conclude, Madam Speaker, by saying that this \nGovernment is being proactive by bringing the necessary changes before the next mutual \nevaluation so as to ensure that no segment under the purview of the FATF remains exposed \nor under supervised. I respectfully urge the hon. Members to support this Bill.   \nBy doing so, we will – \n• \nstrengthen the integrity of our financial system; \n• \nprotect our national security and public institutions; \n• \npreserve investor confidence and our international standing, and \n• \nensure that Mauritius remains a jurisdiction where legitimate commerce \nflourishes and criminals are denied refuge. \nIn closing, let me reiterate our commitments – \n• \nWe will implement these reforms swiftly and transparently;  \n• \nWe will resource and train our institutions; \n• \nWe will monitor outcomes and adapt where necessary, and \n• \nWe will cooperate fully with international partners to demonstrate \nmeasurable effectiveness. \nMadam Speaker, with this, I commend the Bill to the House. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nBill read a second time and committed. \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \n(Madam Speaker in the Chair) \nTHE ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING, COMBATTING THE FINANCING OF \nTERRORISM AND COUNTERING PROLIFERATION FINANCING \n(MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) BILL  \n(No. III of 2026) \nClauses 1 to 3 ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClause 4 (Companies Act amended). \nMotion made and question proposed: “that the clause stand part of the Bill.” \nDr. Ms Jeetun: Madam Chairperson, I move for the following amendment to clause 4 \n– \n“in clause 4, by inserting, after the words “is amended”, the words “, in section 2, in \nsubsection (1),”;” \nAmendment agreed to. \nClause 4, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClause 5 ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClause 6 (Courts Act amended). \nMotion made and question proposed: “that the clause stand part of the Bill.” \nDr. Ms Jeetun: Madam Chairperson, I move for the following amendments to clause 6 \n– \n“in clause 6 – \n(i)  \nin paragraph (b), in the proposed new section 41AA, in subsection (3), by \ndeleting the words “Supreme Court proceed with the trial de die in diem” and \nreplacing them by the words “Supreme Court shall proceed expeditiously with the \ntrial and, if possible, de die in diem,”; \n(ii)  in paragraph (d), in the proposed new section 80E, in subsection (3), by deleting \nthe words “Intermediate Court proceed with the trial de die in diem” and \nreplacing them by the words “Intermediate Court shall proceed expeditiously with \nthe trial and, if possible, de die in diem,”;” \nAmendment agreed to. \nClause 6, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClause 7 (Declaration of Assets Act amended). \nMotion made and question proposed: “that the clause stand part of the Bill.” \nDr. Ms Jeetun: Madam Chairperson, I move for the following amendment to clause 7 \n– \n“in clause 7, in paragraph (f)(ii), by repealing the proposed new subsection (3) and \nreplacing it by the following new subsection – \n(3)  \nNotwithstanding subsection (1), where a person referred to in section \n4(1) or (3) or 6(1)(b) fails to submit a declaration within the specified period and \nthereafter makes a voluntary declaration or makes a declaration not later than 6 \nmonths after having been notified by the Commission, he shall not be liable to \nany penalty, provided that he is not the subject of an investigation under this Act.” \nAmendment agreed to. \nClause 7, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClause 8 ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClause 9 (Financial Crimes Commission Act 2023 amended) \nMotion made and question proposed: “that the clause stand part of the Bill.” \nDr. Ms Jeetun: Madam Chairperson, I move for the following amendments to clause 9 \n– \n“in clause 9, in the proposed new section 68A – \n(i)  \nin subsection (1), by deleting the word “and” at the end of paragraph (b) and \nreplacing it by the word “or”; \n(ii)  in subsection (2), by deleting the word “request” and replacing it by the word \n“requested”;” \nAmendment agreed to. \nClause 9, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClause 10 (Financial Intelligence and Anti-Money Laundering Act amended). \nMotion made and question proposed: “that the clause stand part of the Bill.” \nDr. Ms Jeetun: Madam Chairperson, I move for the following amendments to clause \n10 – \n“in clause 10 – \n(i)  \nin paragraph (b), in the proposed new subsection (5), by deleting the words \n“which may compromise or influence its operational independence”; \n(ii)  in paragraph (d), in the proposed new subsection 10A, in subsection (2), by \ndeleting the words “Subject to subsection (2), a temporarily” and replacing them \nby the words “Subject to subsection (3), a temporary”;” \nAmendment agreed to. \nClause 10, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nClauses 11 to 24 ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nFirst Schedule  \nMotion made and question proposed: “that the first schedule stand part of the Bill.” \nDr. Ms Jeetun: Madam Chairperson, I move for the following amendments to First \nSchedule – \n“in the First Schedule, in the proposed Fifth Schedule, by adding the following new \nitems – \n12. Insurer conducting General Insurance Business \n13. Insurance Broker with respect to General Insurance Business \n14. Professional Reinsurer \n15. Insurance Broker with respect to Reinsurance Business” \nAmendment agreed to. \nFirst Schedule, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nSecond Schedule ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nThe title and enacting clause were agreed to. \nThe Bill, as amended, was agreed to. \nOn the Assembly resuming with Madam Speaker in the Chair, Madam Speaker reported \naccordingly. \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Anti-Money Laundering, Combatting the Financing \nof Terrorism and Countering Proliferation Financing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill (No. III \nof 2026) was read a third time and passed. \n \nSTATEMENT BY MINISTER \n(7.04 p.m.) \nSITTING OF 24 MARCH 2026 – PNQ – FUEL OIL CONTRACT \nThe Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection (Mr M. Yeung Sik Yuen): \nMadam Speaker, with your permission, I would like to make a statement to the House in \nregard to the issue raised at the Sitting of Tuesday 24 March 2026 by the hon. Leader of the \nOpposition during my reply to the PNQ, more precisely the contract allocated to the supply of \nfuel oil used by the CEB. \nGiven the strict obligations, as per the contract on both the State Trading Corporation \nand the supplier, to maintain confidentiality over all documents and information exchanged in \nconnection with the contract unless prior written consent obtained, same had to be sought.  \nI am pleased to inform the House that the supplier’s agreement has now been obtained \nto share the document as it is for transparency purposes. I am therefore tabling a copy of the \nagreement between the State Trading Corporation and Sahara Energy Resources Ltd. It is \nimportant to note that this Government is dedicated to fostering transparency and \naccountability, a shift from the previous administration approach which did not emphasise the \ntabling of contracts for public awareness. \nThe current emphasis on transparency is crucial for maintaining public trust and \nensuring that all stake holders are informed of Government actions. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you so much. Yes, hon. Minister of Housing, adjournment. \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Minister of Housing and Lands (Mr S. Mohamed): Madam Speaker, I beg to \nmove that this Assembly do now adjourn to Tuesday 21 April 2026 at 11.30 a.m. \nDr. Boolell rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned! \nAdjournment matters! \nMATTERS RAISED \n(7.06 p.m.) \nRODRIGUES – RISING COST OF LIVING – REMEDIAL MEASURES \nMr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues): Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nTonight, I raise a concern about Rodrigues rising cost of living which is worsening due \nto price increases felt in local market. I address the issue to the hon. Minister of Commerce \nand Consumer Protection. Basic products and items have seen noticeable price hikes, forcing \nfamilies to drastically adjust the budgets and in some cases, to make tough choices and \nsacrifices about spending priorities. It is not a question of stock availability but high freight \nrate. \nMadam Speaker, I seize this opportunity to urge the hon. Minister to advocate for \nGovernment’s compassionate response to the challenges Rodrigues population faces. I \nhumbly ask for remedial measures grounded in the people’s needs to be continuously \nconsidered and maybe, in the coming budget exercise, knowing that there is the price \nstabilisation structure, subsidy on some essential goods and maximum price system for some \ncontrolled products that should be extended and reviewed. \nI believe we have to go the extra mile to alleviate the expenses of Rodriguan \nconsumers, kou lavi pli ser dan Rodrig anou soulaz pouvwar achat ban famillies. \nTo conclude, Madam Speaker, I urge the hon. Minister to engage with local \nstockholders to initiate an enquiry to understand in detail the impact of a high cost of living \non different aspects of Rodrigues’s residents lives especially vulnerable families and our \nyoungsters.  \nI thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you so much. \nThe Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection (Mr Yeung Sik Yuen): \nMadam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: I wish to inform the House that my Ministry is already working \non a new list of products to be subsidised. It will be for Mauritius and Rodrigues. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Beechook! \n(7.08 p.m.) \nMY.T – PREPAID DATA PACKAGES – VALIDITY PERIOD \nMr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil): Yes, Madam Speaker, I \nwill seek your indulgence for this issue which is addressed to both the hon. Minister of ICT \nand the hon. Minister of Commerce who is in charge of consumer protection. \nMadam Speaker, currently prepaid data package users of MyT buy data packages which \nhas a fixed duration of its validity. It can be daily, weekly or monthly or even more. However, \nafter the balance, the credit is over, the mobile service provider recklessly stops the data \npackage instantly. All of a sudden, a mobile user has no means of communication, he is \ndeprived of his data connection despite being valid. \nConsequently, he has no internet connection to log on to any online recharge platforms \nlike Juice, Tag, MyT Money to recharge his or her balance. This is ridiculously unreasonable, \nMadam Speaker. Therefore, I would request both the hon. Minister of ICT and the hon. \nMinister of Commerce in charge of consumer protection to make sure that this deceitful \npractice ends. \nThank you, Madam speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much. \nThe Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation (Dr. A. Ramtohul): Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. Member for having raised that issue but if \nwhen we are driving a car, petrol gets over the car breaks down immediately. So, I believe \nthat while we are using this mobile device whether, we have a fixed contract or a contract of \ndetermined time, there is a moment where it will lapse. There are notifications that are sent. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nDr. Ramtohul: And there is also an SOS service available that will give you additional \ncredit for which you can pay later but having said that, I will confirm this latter statement and \nrevert on this. As far as I remember, Madam Speaker, that service is available because we are \nvery well conscious of the fact that people may need connection at some point in time and at \ntimes, it can be in very urgent cases. \nSo, I will check that second statement and I will revert hon. Member. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. Thank you very much everybody, enjoy your evening. \nAt 7.10 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 21 April 2026 at \n11.30 a.m. \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nPUBLIC SECTOR – MEDICAL & HEALTH PROFESSIONALS \nRECRUITMENT – MEDICAL & HEALTH SERVICES COMMISSION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/365",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 365,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/365) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the Mahebourg Museum, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the expected re-opening date thereof, \ngiving details of the renovation works which have been or will be carried out thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMS – MAURITIAN CANDIDATES – \nPERFORMANCE & REMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/366",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 366,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/366) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the \nperformance of Mauritian candidates in the last Cambridge International Examinations, he \nwill state the – \n(a) \nremedial measures being taken to address same, and \n(b) \nresponsibility of the different authorities, particularly, the Quality Assurance \nand Inspection Division, in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGRAND BAY WATERFRONT MASTERPLAN – PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP \n– IMPLEMENTATION \n\n161",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/367",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 367,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/367) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in \nregard to the Grand Bay Waterfront, he will state whether consideration is being given for the \npreparation of a Masterplan for the development thereof under Public Private Partnership \nand, if so, indicate the expected timeframe for the preparation and implementation thereof \nand, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUES & MAURITIUS – FIREFIGHTERS – TRANSFERS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/368",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 368,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/368) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the transfer of firefighters between the \nMauritius Fire and Rescue Service and the Rodrigues Fire and Rescue Service since 2022 to \ndate, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number of requests \ntherefor received and the number thereof acceded to.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nUNEXPLOITED AGRICULTURAL LAND – REASONS – MEASURES PROPOSED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/369",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 369,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "B/369\nThe Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue (Mrs Savabaddy) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Local Government – \n \nWhether, in regard to the recent recruitment exercise carried \nout at the District Council of Pamplemousses, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain and table the list of the successful \ncandidates? \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                       PAGE 17 of 26 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/370",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 370,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/370) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to unexploited agricultural land, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to the total extent thereof country-wide, indicating the – \n(a) \nreasons therefor, and \n(b) \nmeasures being envisaged to incentivise the cultivation thereof to ensure food \nself-sufficiency and security.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nANSE RAFFIN, RODRIGUES – UNSTABLE BOULDERS –– CAUSES & OUTCOME \n– INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-21-april-2026"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/371",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 371,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/371) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nNational Infrastructure whether, in regard to the incident whereby unstable boulders rolled \nonto the coastal road near Anse Raffin, in Rodrigues, on 05 April 2026, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to whether an inquiry has been initiated into the \ncauses thereof and, if so, indicate – \n(a) \nthe outcome thereof and table copy of the report thereof, if any, and \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given for the planning of prevention measures for \nfuture works, including slope stabilisation and protective works, in close \ncollaboration with the Rodrigues Regional Assembly.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUES – MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING – CULTURAL \nCOOPERATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/372",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 372,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "B/372\nThe Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix  \n(Mr Lobine) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Local Government – \n \nWhether, in regard to the incinerator at Highlands, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain information as to where \nmatters stand regarding the coming into operation thereof?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/373",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 373,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/373) Ms R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of Arts \nand Culture whether, in regard to the proposed signing of a Memorandum of Understanding \non Cultural Cooperation with the Rodrigues Regional Assembly for the period 2026–2029, he \nwill state – \n(a) \nthe reasons therefor, and \n(b) \nhow the implementation thereof is expected to ensure equitable opportunities for \nRodriguan artists and practitioners in respect of exchanges, training and heritage \npromotion at local, regional and international levels.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nFESTIVAL INTERNATIONAL KREOL – CONCEPT REVIEW – CULTURAL \nHERITAGE ENHANCEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/374",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 374,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. B/374) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Tourism whether, in regard to the Festival International Kreol, \nhe will state whether consideration will be given for a review of the concept and orientation \nthereof with a view to enhancing its cultural heritage and content, incorporating symposiums \nand conferences, increasing local and foreign participation and developing same into a major \nannual tourist attraction.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSKIPPER’S LICENCE – APPLICATIONS RENEWED & REJECTED – PROFILING \nASSESSMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/375",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 375,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "B/375\nThe Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue (Mr Caserne) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Local Government – \n \nWhether, in regard to street lighting vehicles, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the District Council of \nPamplemousses, information as to the number thereof at the \ndisposal of the said Council, indicating the number thereof \ncurrently non-operational and whether consideration will be \ngiven for the acquisition of such fit-for-purpose vehicles?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/376",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 376,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. B/376) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Tourism whether, in regard to the Skipper's licence, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Tourism Authority, information as to – \n(a) \nthe number thereof, category-wise  \n(i) \nissued  \n(ii) \n renewed, and \n(iii)  applications therefor rejected, over the past five years, and \n(b) whether a profiling assessment is conducted prior to the issue thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMETHADONE PROGRAMME – TECHNICAL JOINT WORKING GROUP –\nIMPLEMENTATION TIME FRAME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/377",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 377,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/377) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the methadone programme, \nhe will state where matters stand as to the proposed setting up of a technical joint working \ngroup in relation thereto, indicating the – \n(a) \nterms of reference thereof, and \n(b) \nimplementation time frame therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSODNAC WELLNESS PARK – STRAY DOGS – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/378",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 378,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "B/378\nThe Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes \n(Ms Anquetil) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Land Transport – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Penalty Point System effective from \nJanuary 31, 2026, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the National Land Transport Authority, information as \nto the outcome of the implementation thereof as at to date?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/379",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 379,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/379) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes)  \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries  whether, in \nregard to the persistent presence of stray dogs at the Sodnac Wellness Park and the Farquhar \nRecreational Park, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Society for \nAnimal Welfare, information as to the measures being envisaged in relation thereto, including \nensuring the safety of the persons visiting the said parks and the welfare of the dogs.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nPESTICIDES REGULATORY OFFICE – STAFF REDUCTION – REASONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/380",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 380,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floréal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/380) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the \nMinister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to \nthe Pesticides Regulatory Office, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, \ninformation as to the reasons for the reduction in the number of officers posted thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nTWAHA ACADEMY – ALLEGED AGGRESSION & ILL-TREATMENT MINORS \nCASE – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/381",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 381,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "B/381\nThe Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness – \n \nWhether, in regard to cancer patients residing in Rodrigues \nand requiring treatment in Mauritius, he will state (a) the \nnumber thereof, indicating the (i) frequency of their travel to \nMauritius for treatment and (ii) average estimated yearly cost \nincurred in relation thereto per patient and (b) whether \nconsideration will be given for the setting up of a Cancer \nCentre in Rodrigues? \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                       PAGE 20 of 26 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/382",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 382,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/382) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the alleged \ncases of aggression and ill-treatment of two minors at the Twaha Academy, she will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Family Support Unit, information as to whether an \ninquiry has been initiated thereinto and, if so, indicate the outcome thereof and the measures \ntaken in connection therewith.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nBLACK RIVER (LA BALISE) BOAT PASSAGE – DESILTING WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/383",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 383,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/383) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Black River (La Balise) boat \npassage, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number of times \ndesilting works were carried out thereat, indicating – \n(a) \nthe date of the last such exercise, and  \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given for the urgent desilting thereof on account of \nthe presence of silting thereat currently causing navigational difficulties to users \nthereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGOODLANDS – LABOUR OFFICE – RELOCATION, EMPLOYEES TRAINING & \nUPSKILLING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/384",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 384,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/384) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to the Labour Office in \nGoodlands, he will state whether consideration will be given for the relocation thereof and \nthe provision thereat of the required administrative infrastructure and, if so, indicate the scope \nof services to be provided thereat, including training facilities for the upskilling of employees \nof the private sector and the proposed timeline therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUAN ATHLETES – SPORTS FUNDS ALLOCATED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/385",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 385,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "B/385\nThe Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil  \n(Mr Beechook) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Land Transport – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Taxi Operators Welfare Fund, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to  \n(a) the current number of members thereof (b) the quantum \nof contributions collected from taxi operators since the \ninception thereof to date, indicating the total amount \ndisbursed \ntherefrom \nunder \neach \nscheme \nand \nthe \ncorresponding number of beneficiaries and (c) where matters \nstand regarding the proposal rendering contribution thereto \noptional?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/386",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 386,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/386) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the \nMinister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the participation of athletes from \nRodrigues in international competitions, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the amount of funds \nallocated therefor since January 2025 to date, giving a breakdown thereof by \ndiscipline, and  \n(b) \nstate whether consideration will be given for the setting up of a mechanism, in \ncollaboration with the National Sports Federations to ensure that funding is made \navailable to the said athletes for their participation in national selections for \ninternational competitions.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 12 – DAMAGED ROAD SIGNS – REPAIR & \nREINSTATEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/387",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 387,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "B/387\nThe Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Social Integration, Social Security \nand National Solidarity – \n \nWhether, in regard to the financial assistance provided under \nthe National Solidarity Fund to families affected by the \nflooding which occurred in Rodrigues on 15 March 2026, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to  \n(a) the number of beneficiaries identified and criteria and \nmethodology used for the identification process (b) whether \na comprehensive assessment of damages sustained was \ncarried out and, if so, indicate how the level of compensation \nwas determined and (c) the quantum of compensation \ndisbursed or to be disbursed? \n \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                       PAGE 22 of 26 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/388",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 388,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/388) Mr T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the road signs reportedly \ndamaged, faded or not clearly visible in Constituency No. 12, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to the number thereof, indicating whether consideration will be \ngiven for the urgent carrying out of repair and reinstatement works thereof and the timeframe \nset therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nFISHERMAN REGISTRATION CARD – APPLICATIONS REQUIREMENT – \nCERTIFICATE OF CHARACTER",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/389",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 389,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/389) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the Fisherman Registration Card, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to whether it is a prerequisite for the applicants for the issue thereof to hold a \nclean Certificate of Character for eligibility thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nALPHA CLEANING GROUP – EXPATRIATE EMPLOYEES’ DEPORTATION – \nREASONS & SANCTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/390",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 390,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "B/390\nThe Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of National Infrastructure – \n \nWhether, in regard to the recent torrential rain and flooding \nthat severely affected the northern region of Rodrigues \nIsland, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nLand Drainage Authority and the National Development Unit, \ninformation as to (a) where matters stand regarding the \nimplementation of the Accacia drain works and (b) whether \nconsideration will be given for the implementation of the  \nPort Mathurin phase 3 drain project, through emergency \nprocurement? \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                       PAGE 23 of 26 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/391",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 391,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade",
      "question": "B/391\nThe Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and \nSouillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional \nIntegration and International Trade – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Maldives, he will state whether, \nfollowing the recent suspension of our diplomatic relations \ntherewith, an updated list of Mauritian nationals currently \nresiding or employed thereat has been drawn, indicating the \ncommunication \nchannels \nand \nconsular \nmechanisms \nestablished, if any, to provide timely guidance, assistance and \nprotection thereto and whether any Mauritian national has \nreached out accordingly and, if so, indicate the measures \ntaken in relation thereto?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/392",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 392,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/392) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to the case \nof approximately 80 expatriate employees of the Alpha Cleaning Group recently deported or \nin the process thereof, with no right of re-entry, he will, state the reasons therefor and the \nsanctions, if any, taken against the said company.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSUPERMARKETS/HYPERMARKETS – LEVYING CHARGES – REGULATION & \nCUSTOMER IMPACT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/393",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 393,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/393) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the practice of \nsupermarkets and hypermarkets levying charges, including remises de fin d’année and \nmarketing fees on their suppliers, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as \nto whether – \n(a) \nsame are regulated, and  \n(b) \nthe impact thereof on retail prices and customer purchasing power has been \nassessed and, if so, indicate the findings thereof and measures envisaged to ensure \nfair trading.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMOTORWAYS MONITORING & POLICING – SAFE CITY SURVEILLANCE \nCAMERAS – POLICE MONITORING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/394",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 394,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/394) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the monitoring and policing of motorways, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a)  the effectiveness of the Safe City surveillance cameras in ensuring compliance \nwith road traffic laws thereon, and  \n(b)  whether close monitoring is effected in collaboration with the Commissioner of \nPolice in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "Reply (The Prime Minister): I am informed by the Commissioner of Police that in \nDecember 2017, the Police signed a contract on a lease basis over a period of 20 years with \nMauritius Telecom for the implementation of the Safe City Project. On 19 August 2019, the \nsystem came into operation.  \nThe project comprises 2000 Intelligent Video Surveillance (IVS) cameras sites \nthroughout the island, including 34 along motorways, and 75 Intelligent Traffic Surveillance \n(ITS) cameras sites, including 10 along motorways. \nThe Safe City Surveillance Camera System is being utilised by the Police for the \nmonitoring and policing of motorways and major roads. Since the implementation of the \nproject, 1,959 cases, including crimes and misdemeanours, have been detected through Safe \nCity Cameras. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I would like to inform the House that, presently, \nthe Road Traffic Act does not provide for enforcement of road traffic offences through the \nSafe City Surveillance Camera System.  \nIn fact, one of the measures announced in the Budget 2025-2026 is that the use of Safe \nCity Cameras will be extended to improve traffic operations and detect road traffic offences. \nI wish to inform the House that a High-Level Committee has been set up, co-chaired by \nthe hon. Minister of Land Transport and the hon. Minister of Information Technology, \nCommunication and Innovation, to spearhead the extension of the Safe City System to cater \nfor traffic-related offences.  The committee comprises representatives from my office, the \nPolice, Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit, Central Informatics Bureau and the \nNational Land Transport Authority. \nIn this context, I am informed that the Ministry of Land Transport, in collaboration with \nthe Police, is working on a draft Traffic Offence Enforcement Regulations 2026.  \nIn addition, the Police, in consultation with Mauritius Telecom, is working on a \nproposal to provide enhanced additional features on the Safe City System that would allow \nfor the detection of the following key traffic offences, namely – \n(a) \nspeeding; \n(b) \nnon-usage of seat belts; \n(c) \nuse of handheld devices while driving, and \n(d) \novertaking on continuous white lines. \nPending the amendment of the relevant legislation and enhancement of the features, \nfootage from the Safe City System continue to be used as evidence in crime-related cases. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, Police works in close collaboration with the Traffic \nManagement and Road Safety Unit and the National Land Transport Authority to ensure \ncompliance with current road traffic laws and regulations. Police also provides technical \ninputs for any amendment to existing traffic laws and specifications for traffic-related \nequipment and devices. \nMAURITIUS POST LTD – FINANCIAL SITUATION – MEASURES & IMPACT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/395",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 395,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/395) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nInformation Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in regard to the Mauritius \nPost Ltd., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to the current \nfinancial situation thereof, indicating the – \n(a) \nreasons therefor;  \n(b) \nimpact thereof on the employees, and  \n(c) \nmeasures being envisaged to address same.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBROWN SEQUARD HOSPITAL – UNCLAIMED CORPSES – MEASURES \nENVISAGED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/396",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 396,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/396) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the Brown Sequard \nHospital, he will state the current number of unclaimed corpses in the mortuary thereof, \nindicating since when same have been lying there and the measures being envisaged to deal \nwith this issue and whether his Ministry is in presence of requests from medical colleges to \nbe handed over same for research purposes and, if so, where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPOST OFFICES – RENOVATION/PERMANENT CLOSURE – ALTERNATIVE \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/397",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 397,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/397) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation \nwhether, in regard to the post offices, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nMauritius Post Ltd. and table the list thereof earmarked for renovation or permanent closure \nand in respect of the latter, indicate the – \n(a) \nreasons therefor, and  \n(b) \nalternative measures being envisaged for the residents of the localities concerned \ntherewith in relation to the services provided by same.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/17",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 17,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "A/17\nThe Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka \n(Dr Ms Thannoo) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Education and Human \nResource – \n \nWhether, in regard to bullying in public primary and \nsecondary schools, he will state whether consideration will be \ngiven for the (a) revision of the policy currently in force in \nrespect of the expulsion of bullies (b) devising of a national \nevidence-based prevention policy from academic research \nand \nsuccessful \nmeasures \nimplemented \nglobally \nand  \n(c) identification of key measures based on restorative justice \nto support the rehabilitation of bullies to achieve long-term \nchanges in behavioural patterns, to be provided by skilled \ncounsellors and psychologists in all such reported cases?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/18",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 18,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "A/18\nThe Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka \n(Dr Ms Thannoo) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, \nBlue Economy and Fisheries – \n \nWhether, in regard to the food security measures being \nenvisaged, he will state whether consideration will be given \nfor the (a) conversion of the Barkly Experiment Centre into a \nnational seed bank for all indigenous seeds and for same to \nrevert to its operational model of the 1970s, whereby \nvegetables were grown organically and seeds harvested on a \nregular basis for the provision thereof to vegetable growers \nthroughout the year and (b) imposition of a ban on the \nimportation of hybrid seeds? \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                       PAGE 26 of 26 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/19",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 19,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "A/19\nThe Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka \n(Dr Ms Thannoo) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Local Government – \n \nWhether, in regard to the garbage collection services, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Moka District \nCouncil, information as to whether consideration will be \ngiven for (a) increasing the garbage trucks fleet and the \nnumber of mechanics to ensure the operational readiness \nthereof (b) the levying of a fee on gated communities and the \nMoka Smart City therefor and (c) the reviewing of the \nprocurement method for spare parts of these trucks?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/20",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 20,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "A/20\nThe Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka \n(Dr Ms Thannoo) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Education and Human \nResource – \n \nWhether, in regard to the maintenance of sports and football \npitches and other spaces in public schools, he will state \nwhether consideration will be given for the recruitment of \ntwo gardeners per school on a permanent basis to ensure the \nupkeep thereof, in replacement of the services currently \nprovided by Mauri-facilities?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/21",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-14-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-14",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 21,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "A/21\nThe Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Social Integration, Social Security \nand National Solidarity – \n \nWhether, in regard to the families/households affected by the \nrecent torrential rain in Rodrigues, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain information as to the number thereof \nhaving been granted (a) funds under the National \nEmpowerment Fund and (b) ad-hoc assistance under the \nNational Solidarity Fund? \n \n \nBibi Safeena Lotun, C.S.K. (Mrs)                                          \n Clerk of the National Assembly \n \nParliament House \nPort Louis  \n \n10 April 2026",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/398",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 398,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/398) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the proposed \nestablishment of a Special Economic Zone at Côte d’Or, he will state the – \n(a) \nproposed incentive package for prospective promoters, developers and operators \nthereof;  \n(b) \nestimated financial cost thereof to Government, and  \n(c) \nanticipated tangible benefits for the Mauritian economy in terms of foreign direct \ninvestment and job creation.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO – UK-MAURITIUS AGREEMENT – BIOT SUPREME \nCOURT JUDGEMENT – CONSEQUENCES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/399",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 399,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/399) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nAgreement signed between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and \nNorthern Ireland and the Government of the Republic of Mauritius concerning the Chagos \nArchipelago including Diego Garcia, he will state the consequences, if any, of the judgment \ndelivered by the Supreme Court (British Indian Ocean Territory) on 31 March 2026 on the \nratification thereof.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PNQ) \nMadam Speaker: So, you are right, hon. Jhummun. It is your turn! \nSBM HOLDINGS LTD – GOVERNMENT SHAREHOLDING – TOXIC LOANS \nWRITTEN OFF (2014-2024)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/400",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 400,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/400) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to SBM Holdings Ltd., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nthe – \n(a) \npercentage of shareholding of the Government of Mauritius therein, and  \n(b) \ntotal amount of toxic loans written off over the period 2014 to 2024, indicating \nthe – \n(i) \nactions taken to recoup same;  \n(ii) \nnames of the chairperson and head of the Credit Committee during the said \nperiod, and  \n(iii) responsibility of the Board of Directors in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, SBM Holdings Ltd is the holding and ultimate \nparent company of the SBM Group, which includes SBM Bank (Mauritius) Ltd. It is a public \ncompany public company limited by shares, and is listed on the Stock Exchange of Mauritius. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, as at 31 March 2026, the Government of \nMauritius holds a direct shareholding of 4.92% in SBM Holdings Ltd, for a market value of \nRs987 million. \nConcerning part (b) of the question, I assume that the hon. Member is referring to the \nloans made by SBM Bank (Mauritius) Ltd. \nIn this respect, I am informed that, for the period 2014 to 2024, the cumulative write-\noffs amounted to approximately Rs14.34 billion, compared to just Rs1.12 billion for the \nperiod 2004 to 2013.  \nOn average, for the period 2014 to 2024, the Bank was writing off Rs1.3 billion \nannually, compared to an annual average of Rs100 million from 2004 to 2013. This \nrepresents a more than a tenfold increase, clearly reflecting a total disregard of basic banking \nprinciples and a complete breakdown in the effectiveness of asset monitoring, risk \nmanagement and internal controls over the period, that is, 2014 to 2024.   \nThat was not just a systemic failure but a deliberate action to dilapidate the Bank’s \nassets. \nOne must ask oneself why has the Bank been subjected to such a terrible fate! Two \nweeks ago, in this House I gave enough details about the plundering which took place at \nSilver Bank and before that, I had replied to a PQ on the Development Bank of Mauritius \nwhere, again, hundreds of million were given away to cronies of the previous regime without \ncollaterals.   \nThe Rs14.34 billion which had been written off by the SBM took place in the same vein \nas was seen in other banking institutions under the, I should call it a kleptocratic former \nregime. During the 10-year period, they stopped at nothing to loot the assets of various banks \nwhile their protégés at the Central Bank turned a blind eye on the regime’s daylight robbery. \nThat’s what it was, Madam Speaker, daylight robbery. \nThe consequences have been significant. The profitability of the Bank was severely \nimpacted, and its capital has been eroded.  \nMadam Speaker, this adds to the long list of scandals under the former regime, \ninvolving huge loans made to large corporates without proper scrutiny and due diligence. \nSurprisingly, these loans were provided without adequate collaterals and in some cases \nwithout any collateral at all.   \nThe House will recall the total loan of Rs1.4 billion which was granted to \nDhyanavartam Ltd, the operator of Maradiva Villas Resort & Spa, at a time when the \ncompany was already facing financial difficulties. Yet, they got another loan of Rs1.4 billion.  \nThis includes a facility of approximately Rs470 million extended to Dhyanavartam Ltd \nin 2024 on the eve of the General Elections in spite of the fact that the then Credit Committee \ndid not approve the loan. In spite of that, they were given the loan. Allegedly, this was \noverridden by the then Chief Executive of the Bank, Mr Premchand Mungur and this matter \nis being investigated by the FCC. \nMadam Speaker, when we look at the period 2014 to 2024, the impaired loans were \nhighly concentrated. Three companies alone were sufficient to erode the capital of the Bank \nto a point where a new capital injection had to be made. \nThe total loans granted to these three foreign companies, namely NMC Healthcare, \nPabari Group and Renish Petrochem FZE, without adequate or no tangible collateral at all, \namounted to Rs9 billion out of the total of Rs14.34 billion which represents approximately \ntwo-thirds of the total toxic loans for that period. \nThese impaired loans plummeted the profits of the SBM Holdings. In 2019, the SBM \nHoldings recorded a lamentable profit of Rs15 million only in contrast to the Rs2.7 billion in \n2013.  Look at the damage that has been done. That was an all-time low in the recent history \nof the Bank. \nThis is what the MSM regime did to the SBM, supported by their accomplices in the \nBank of Mauritius.  \nIn all these bank scandals which we have brought to light in this House, one must ask \nwhere was the supervisory responsibility of the Bank of Mauritius! \nFortunately, as from January 2025, the situation at SBM Bank has been improving, and \nthe bank has proved to be quite resilient in spite of the past scandalous actions. \nMadam Speaker, what has happened at the SBM, cannot and will not go unpunished.  \nWith regard to all provisions and write-offs, internal investigations are already \nunderway.  A special dedicated team has been set up on 23 March of this year for this purpose \nand specialised investigators are being recruited. We need specialised investigators. It is \nacknowledged that, on the recovery side, the task will be challenging in the absence of \ntangible collateral. They just gave loans without collaterals.  \nThe appointment of external consultants to assist with recovery and investigated efforts \nwas approved by the Board in December 2025.  \nThe focus is not only on the external parties, but also identifying with the Bank who \nhave contributed to or enabled such transactions. Even individuals who may no longer be \nemployed by or associated with the Bank will not be spared. \nMadam Speaker, as regards to part (b)(i), I am informed that the Bank has taken several \nactions to recoup amounts due, including – \n(a) \nthe realisation of collateral and securities, where there are collaterals; \n(b) \nthe initiation of legal proceedings against defaulting borrowers, both locally and \ninternationally, and \n(c) \nthe implementation of recovery and restructuring mechanisms, where it would be \nappropriate. \nAs of now, an amount of Rs2.6 billion has been recovered by the Bank. I am informed \nthat all avenues are being pursued to recover the dues.   \nAs regards part (b)(ii), I am informed that from 2014 to 2019, it was a Board Credit \nCommittee that made the credit decisions. The various chairpersons of this Committee were \nas follows – \n(a) \nfrom January 2014 to December 2014 - Mr Muni Krishna Reddy; \n(b) \nfrom January 2015 to December 2017 - Mr Nayen Kumar Ballah; \n(c) \nfrom January 2017 to March 2019 - Mr Mahmadally Burkutoola, and \n(d) \nfrom March 2019 to December 2019 - Mr Raja Krishna Chellapermal. \nWith effect from 2020, the responsibility for credit decisions was then entrusted to the \nManagement Credit Forum. The chairpersons of this Forum for the period 2020 to 2024 were \nas follows – \n(a) \nfrom January 2020 to June 2021 - Mr Jorge Stock; \n(b) \nfrom July 2021 to January 2023 - Mr Anoop Nilamber; \n(c) \nfrom February 2023 to October 2023 - Mr Sanjaye Rawoteea, and \n(d) \nfrom November 2023 to December 2024 - Mr Premchand Mungur.  \nThe House may wish to note that both the Board Credit Committee and the \nManagement Credit Forum were managed by the Head of Credit of the Bank.  The Head of \nCredit is responsible for assessing and making recommendations in respect to loan \napplications. Over the period 2014 to 2024, this position was occupied by the following \npersons – \n(a) \nJanuary 2014 to July 2016 – Ms Pauline Seyave; \n(b) \nSeptember 2016 to August 2021 – Mrs Veronique Lim Hoye Yee; \n(c) \nSeptember 2021 to December 2022 – Mr Darmen Hurkoo; \n(d) \nJanuary 2023 to December 2023 – Mr Rajnish Lutchmah, and \n(e) \nJanuary 2024 to December 2024 – Mrs Veronique Lim Hoye Yee. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (b)(iii), I am informed that the Board of Directors has \nthe responsibility to safeguard the Bank’s assets and protect its clients’ deposits. This \ninvolves ensuring sound banking operations, effective leadership as well as exercising overall \ncontrol of its affairs. It also entails proper risk management and financial oversight through \nthe establishment of a robust internal control system. The Board is thus responsible for \nminimising credit losses and write-offs as well as the initiation of appropriate recovery \nmeasures in respect of impaired loans.  \nIt goes without saying, Madam Speaker, that the Board Directors failed miserably in \ntheir fiduciary duties. \nMadam Speaker, when one connects the dots, it is evident that these toxic exposures are \nnot isolated incidents but the result of a pattern of poor lending decisions, absence of controls \nand inadequate oversight for a number of years under the former Government. I would even \nadd it was done deliberately. \nLet me be very clear, Madam Speaker, this Government will not tolerate any form of \nmismanagement that undermines public confidence or jeopardises the integrity of our \nfinancial system. \nAs I have said on numerous occasions, these crimes will not go unpunished. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nOkay. Hon. Second Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre d'Or. \nPOLICE FAMILY PROTECTION UNIT – NORTHERN DIVISION – CASES & \nJURISDICTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/401",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 401,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/401) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nPolice Family Protection Unit, Northern Division, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Commissioner of Police, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of – \n(i) \ncases handled category-wise since January 2026 to date, indicating the \naverage response time and case resolution rate; \n(ii) \nofficers and ranks thereof attached thereto, and reasons for their frequent \ntransfer since 2023 to date, and \n(b) \njurisdiction thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat, in 2022, the Police Family Protection Unit and the Brigade Pour la Protection des \nMineurs were merged and restructured as the Brigade pour la Protection de la Famille. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a)(i) of the question, according to the \nCommissioner of Police, since 01 January 2026 to 17 April 2026, 198 cases have been \nhandled by the Brigade pour la Protection de la Famille of the Northern Division as follows – \n1) \n132 cases of Domestic Violence of which – \n(i) \n50 were on physical abuses; \n(ii) \n48 on verbal abuses; \n(iii) \n22 on threats of violence. \n(iv) \n6 on psychological abuses; \n(v) \n5 on financial constraints, and \n(vi) \n1 on property damage. \n2) \n49 cases of Child Abuse of which – \n(i) \n40 were related to sexual offences; \n(ii) \n3 on offences of ill-treatment; \n(iii) 2 on offences of assaults; \n(iv) 2 on cohabitation of an adult with a child: \n(v) \n1 on abduction of child, and \n(vi) 1 on bullying. \n3) \n17 cases of Elderly Abuse of which – \n(i) \n12 were on psychological abuses, and \n(ii) \n5 on physical abuses. \n4) \nOut of the 198 cases reported – \n(i) \n27 accused in 27 cases have been either fined or imprisoned; \n(ii) \n12 cases have been resolved through first hand counselling by the Brigade \npour la Protection de la Famille of the Northern Division; \n(iii) 5 cases have been filed with no further action for the following reasons – \n(a) \nin one case, the police has issued a warning to the accused; \n(b) \nthree cases were related to only precautionary measure, and there has \nbeen no follow up by the alleged victims; \n(c) \nin one case, the victim withdrew her complaint. \n(iv) 4 cases are pending trial in Court;  \n(v) \nfor the remaining 150 cases, the enquiries are expected to be completed in \nfour to five months and the case files would be submitted to the Office of \nthe Director of Prosecution for advice. \nIn general, Police intervene in a prompt manner, within an average of 15 minutes of the \nreporting of any incident. \nMadam Speaker, as regards part (a)(ii) of the question, I am informed that 14 Police \nOfficers are currently posted to the Brigade pour la Protection de la Famille of the Northern \nDivision and they are as follows –  \n(i) \n1 Police Inspector; \n(ii) \n1 Police Sergeant; \n(iii) 3 Women Police Sergeants; \n(iv) 2 Police Constables, and \n(v) \n7 Women Police Constables. \nFrom 2023 to 16 April 2026, 13 Police Officers were transferred from the Brigade pour \nla Protection de la Famille and were replaced by 12 Police Officers. The transfer of Police \nOfficers is a common practice within the Force not only to enhance skills and meet \nadministrative needs but also based on the exigencies of service. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, the Brigade pour la Protection de la Famille of the \nNorthern Division has a main office at Piton Divisional Headquarters and another office at \nthe Triolet Police Station. The Brigade also provides support to the Goodlands Family \nSupport Services of the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family Welfare. The Brigade pour \nla Protection de la Famille of the Northern Division has jurisdiction over 14 police stations \nfrom Tombeau Bay to Grand Bay and from Rivière du Rempart to Pamplemousses.  All cases \nof domestic violence, child abuse and elderly abuse reported and investigated by 14 police \nstations are referred to the District Courts of either Pamplemousses or Rivière du Rempart. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Beejan. \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Prime Minister inform the \nHouse that in view of statistics of previous years which clearly show that cases of domestic \nviolence, child abuse and ill-treatment of elderly person have increased, will he direct the \nCommissioner of Police to reorganise this Unit by separating Protection de la Famille and \nthat of Protection of minors? Thank you.  \nThe Prime Minister: In fact, the police are doing that. They have applied but a lot of \nthese appointments depends on the DFSC. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, the second one.  \nMr Beejan: May I ask the hon. Prime Minister to indicate whether, due consideration \nwill be given for additional police officers having a broad knowledge in this specialised unit? \nThe Prime Minister: This is what I indicated. The Commissioner of Police is doing \njust that.  \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Was that alright? \nYes, okay.  \nSo, next question then hon. Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne Longue. \nMAURITIUS POLICE FORCE – FINANCE & REVENUE SECTION – VACANCIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/402",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 402,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/402) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Finance and Revenue Section of the Mauritius Police Force, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the number \nof current vacancies thereat, giving a breakdown thereof grade-wise, indicating when same \nwill be filled.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat the Finance and Revenue Section of the Mauritius Police Force is responsible for budget \nallocation, expenditure, and revenue collection in compliance with the Finance and Audit Act \n2015. According to the Organisation Chart, the Section should comprise 62 officers from the \nFinance Cadre. Presently, the Section is staffed with 48 officers of the Finance Cadre in the \nfollowing grades – \nManager, Financial Operations \n \n \n \n \n- \nTwo \nAssistant Manager, Financial Operations \n \n \n \n- \nFive \nPrincipal Financial Operations Officer  \n \n \n- \nNine \nFinancial Operations Officer/Senior Financial Operations \n- \nEight \nAssistant Financial Operations Officer  \n \n \n- \nTwenty-four \nThere are 14 vacancies for the post of Assistant Financial Operations Officer. 13 Police \nOfficers, including two Police Sergeants, are posted to the Finance Section to assist in its \ndaily operations. \nMadam Speaker, on 09 May 2025, the Ministry of Finance had reported a total of 94 \nvacancies in the grade of Assistant Financial Operations Officer to the Public Service \nCommission. The vacancies were advertised on 20 August 2025. The candidates will be \nrequired to sit for a written competitive examination conducted by the Commission. That \nwritten examination is still being awaited. \nThe Mauritius Police Force has, on several occasions, informed the Ministry of Finance \nof the acute shortage of the financial cadre. The last correspondence sent to the Ministry dates \nto 10 April 2026. \nMadam Speaker, I have requested the Public Service Commission to expedite the filling \nof vacancies that have remained unfilled. \nMadam Speaker: One moment. Mr Caserne, you are alright? Okay.  \nMr François: Just allow me to put a supplementary, Madam Speaker.  \nMay I ask the hon. Prime Minister whether, he is aware that the shortage of human \nresources as he mentioned at this department is causing a lot of retard of payment of passage \nbenefits dues to many police officers who applied for same for medical, travelling and study \npurposes many months ago or I should rather say back since September, last year? Can \nneedful be done to expedite matters thereat? \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, that is why we have requested, through my \noffice, to the Public Service Commission to expedite the filling of vacancies that have \nremained unfilled.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, next question. \nFirst Member for Port Louis North & Montagne Longue! \nPUBLIC SERVICE – RECRUITMENT PROCESS – MERITOCRACY & NON-\nDISCRIMINATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/403",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 403,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/403) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the public service, he will state the measures being envisaged to ensure – \n(a)  increased transparency and accountability in the recruitment process therein, and  \n(b)  that the principles of meritocracy and non-discrimination in employment are \nupheld through the strengthening of the powers of the Equal Opportunities \nCommission in line with the commitment taken in the Presidential Address.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, transparency in recruitment in the public \nservice is crucial to ensure fairness, meritocracy, and public confidence in government \ninstitutions. Several measures have been implemented to enhance transparency. \nThe Public Service Commission and the Local Government Service Commission are \nbodies responsible for recruitment, appointment and promotion in the public service. Their \nindependence helps prevent political interference and ensures that decisions are taken \nimpartially. \nEach post, Madam Speaker, in the public service is governed by a scheme of service, \nwhich clearly outlines the qualifications, experience, and skills required. Candidates are \nassessed through structured interviews, and in some cases, written examinations. This ensures \nthat the selection is based on the above criteria and principles of meritocracy. \nThe E-Recruitment Systems at the Public Service Commission and the Disciplined \nForces Service Commission allow vacancies to be advertised online and candidates can \nsubmit applications electronically. This ensures equal opportunity and allows better tracking \nof applications, thus reducing the risk of manipulation. \nIn addition, the standardised recruitment procedures applied across ministries and \ndepartments include clear guidelines for shortlisting interviewing and the final selection, \nwhich promote consistency and fairness. \nAs laid down in the Government Programme 2025-2029, my Government is committed \nto undertake major reforms to ensure that recruitment and promotion in the public sector are \nconducted in an enhanced and transparent and fair manner. \nTo that effect, the Public Service Commission is developing a modernised E-\nRecruitment System not only to receive online application, but also to carry out the automatic \nscreening of applications to determine the eligibility of candidates. The Local Government \nService Commission is working on an E-Recruitment System which will be introduced, I \nbelieve, early next year. \nMy Government will also introduce clear and standardised selection criteria and \nstrengthen oversight mechanisms to ensure full accountability throughout the recruitment \nprocess. Furthermore, in view of the undue delays in the filing of vacancies, again, the Public \nService Commission will re-engineer its administrative processes to expedite the recruitment \nprocess. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, Government remains resolute in ensuring that \nmeritocracy prevails and that no form of discrimination arises in employment. \nIn this respect, following preliminary consultations aimed at identifying the necessary \namendments to be brought to the Equal Opportunities Act, my office has approached the Law \nReform Commission to undertake a comprehensive review of the legal framework with a \nview to strengthening the powers of the Equal Opportunities Commission. \nThe Law Reform Commission has, accordingly, submitted a Discussion Paper entitled \n\"Strengthening the Powers of the Equal Opportunities Commission\", which provides an in-\ndepth review of the Equal Opportunities Act and its interaction with the Workers' Rights Act \n2019, and proposes a series of reforms aimed at reinforcing the legal and institutional \nframework governing equality in Mauritius. \nThe proposals put forward include, inter-alia – \n(i) \nthe extension of the definition of status under the Act, and \n(ii) \nan improved coordination between the Equal Opportunities Commission and \nrelevant institutions. \nThe Discussion Paper also contains an Equal Opportunities (Amendment) Bill in draft \nform provided for enhanced enforcement powers, including sanctions in cases of non-\ncompliance. \nConsultations have, accordingly, been initiated with key stakeholders, and the views \nreceived are currently being consolidated with a view to finalising the appropriate legislative \nand policy measures. \nMadam Speaker, the Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal also acts as an oversight \nmechanism on decisions taken by the Public Service Commission and the Local Government \nService Commission. Its main object is to hear and determine appeals made by any public \nofficer or any local government officer against any decision of the Public Service \nCommission or the Local Government Service Commission, as the case may be, pertaining to \nan appointment exercise or to a disciplinary action taken against that officer. \nMadam Speaker, may I remind the House that I introduced the Equal Opportunities Act \nand the Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal Act. This was done with the precise objectives to \nensure that public officers have a mechanism to have redress if they think they have been \naggrieved. In the past, this would take years. Now, with the tribunal, it does not. My \nGovernment has had the political will to take bold measures to create more opportunities for \nall components of our society. In the same vein, I am reiterating my engagement and that of \nmy Government to ensure that recruitment in the public service is transparent, fair and based \non merit. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, first supplementary! \nMs Savabaddy: Merci, Madame la présidente. Puis-je demander à l’honorable Premier \nministre s’il peut examiner les recrutements récents, par exemple, dans les autorités locales, \noù clairement ces principes de méritocratie et de non-discrimination n’ont pas été suivis ? Par \nexemple, seulement trois sur 123 dans un cas. Peut-il mener une enquête dessus ? Merci. \nThe Prime Minister: This is being done. Actually, I can say to the House that the \nChairperson has resigned. He has submitted his resignation following that enquiry. \nAn hon. Member: Bien bizin! \nMadam Speaker: Okay, second! \nMs Savabaddy: Merci, Madame la présidente. L’honorable Premier ministre peut-il \nconsidérer l’élargissement du champ d’intervention de l’Equal Opportunities Commission \nafin qu’elle soit plus efficace et non pas comme c’est le cas actuellement ? Cela prend six \nmois, par exemple, pour que la commission convoque pour la première fois la plaignante. \nJustice delayed is justice denied. Merci. \nMadam Speaker: I think it has been replied. Anyway! \nThe Prime Minister: The short answer is: there is a huge backlog. The previous \nregime – and you know who was there – just did nothing! \nMs Anquetil: Exactement! \nMadam Speaker: Yes, one for the hon. Member! \nMr A. Duval: Thank you. May I ask the hon. Prime Minister with regard to the Equal \nOpportunities Commission, pending the Public Service Commission’s propositions for \nreform and the Law Reform Commission, is the hon. Prime Minister agreeable to, at least, \nopen up the application of the Equal Opportunities Commission to cases of discrimination at \nwork in the public service so that they may enquire and take sanctions in the case of public \nservants, where they are victims of discrimination or other offences under the Equal \nOpportunities Act? \nThe Prime Minister: The Public Bodies Appeal Tribunal was made for that. But we \nwill have to change the law, to amend the law to consider that.  \nMadam Speaker: There is a little confusion.  \nAnyway, next question! Hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES REGIONAL ASSEMBLY ACT – PROPOSED AMENDMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/404",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 404,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/404) Mr J. F. Francois (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the proposed \namendments to the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act, he will state where matters stand, \nindicating – \n(a) \nthe number of proposals received therefor as at to date, and \n(b) \nwhether the introduction thereof in the Assembly and enactment thereof can be \nexpected prior to the forthcoming Regional Assembly Elections pending the \nintroduction of the major proposed national electoral reform.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to \nrefer the hon. Member to my reply to his Parliamentary Question B/1194 on the same subject. \nI had informed the House that on receipt of the proposed amendments from the Rodrigues \nRegional Assembly, consultations with relevant stakeholders would be undertaken with a \nview to ensuring a comprehensive review of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act. \nOn 27 February of this year, the Island Chief Executive of the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly has, following approval of the Executive Council, submitted proposals comprising \nfifteen amendments to key provisions of the Rodrigues Regional Assembly. \nThe proposed amendments relate, amongst others, to the definition and delimitation of \nRodrigues, the qualifications of members of the Regional Assembly, the composition and \nfunctioning of the Executive Council, the autonomy of Commissions and Departments within \nthe Rodrigues Regional Assembly, mechanisms for dispute resolution, creation of localities \nand recognition of villages and amendments to the Constitution. \nThese proposed amendments will have far-reaching implications on institutional \narrangements, on the electoral framework and the consequential amendment to the \nConstitution. Consultations are underway with Attorney General's Office, the Electoral \nCommissioner's Office, the Ministry of Local Government, and the Department for \nContinental Shelf, Maritime Zones Administration and Explorations. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, the Electoral Commissioner \nhas been consulted. He has emphasised that the best practice is to legislate and prepare \nreforms well in advance of the next electoral contest, and to ensure that such reforms are \ndeveloped through broad and inclusive consultation involving both political and non-political \nstakeholders. \nThe proposed amendments to the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act form part of a \nbroader institutional and constitutional framework. Accordingly, all proposals for the \namendments to the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act must be considered as a whole and in \nan integrated manner. \nIn this context, I am proposing to set up a High-Level Committee to examine the \nproposed amendments to the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act, undertake consultations and \nmake appropriate recommendations. \nMadam Speaker: Fine. Time is up, anyway!  \nI had mentioned PQ B/398 has been withdrawn.  \nNow, The Table has been advised that PQs B/408, B/409, B/411, B/413, B/414, B/415, \nB/417, B/418, and B/419 have been withdrawn. \nSo, now we go to questions addressed to hon. Ministers and I call – I hope I have got \nthese all right because it is written everywhere. Let me just check. \n I see PQs B/443, B/445, B/461, B/470 have been withdrawn. In case I have said it \ntwice, please, forgive me. \nYes, hon. First Member for Rodrigues, Ms Collet! \nRODRIGUES – SUPERAPP KOREK – IMPLEMENTATION & ACCESSIBILITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/405",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 405,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floréal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "B/405\nThe \nHonourable \nFirst \nMember \nfor \nVacoas \nand \nFloréal  \n(Ms Joanna Bérenger) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,   \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands – \n \nWhether, in regard to Silver Bank, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain information as to (a) whether all the former \nmanagers and directors thereof have been interrogated and, \nif not, why not (b) whether compensation of the depositors is \nbeing envisaged (c) the quantum of fees paid to the \nconservator thereof and reasons for the duration of the \nconservatorship and (d) whether consideration will be given \nfor the institution of a public inquiry thereinto? \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                     PAGE 4 of 29 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/406",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 406,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "B/406\nThe Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and \nMontagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,   \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands – \n \nWhether, in regard to the alleged referral of some 45 prison \nofficers to the Financial Crimes Commission (FCC) by the then \nCommissioner of Prisons, Mr D. J., for unexplained wealth and \nthe FCC denying having been referred the said cases, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of \nPolice, information as to whether an inquiry has been \ninitiated thereinto and, if so, indicate, the outcome thereof?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/407",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 407,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "B/407\nThe Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix  \n(Mr Lobine) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,   \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands – \n \nWhether, in regard to the serious concerns raised on the state \nof affairs in the prisons in the Annual Report 2025 of the \nNational Human Rights Commission, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Commissioner of Prisons, \ninformation as to the immediate remedial and long-term \nmeasures being envisaged, respectively, to ensure that the \nprisons in Mauritius meet international norms and \nstandards?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/408",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 408,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/408) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nupgrading of Mauritius to the Special Data Dissemination Standard Plus (SDDS+) status by \nthe International Monetary Fund, he will state the – \n(a) \nmeasures taken by Government that led thereto, and  \n(b) \nkey benefits associated therewith, particularly, in terms of access to financing, \ninvestment prospects and economic resilience.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nINDIAN OCEAN MARITIME SECURITY – BILATERAL AGREEMENTS & \nSTRATEGIC COOPERATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/409",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 409,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/409) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \ncurrent strategic importance of the Indian Ocean as a maritime route and as a potential source \nof raw materials, including of Gas Oil and Mogas, he will state the bilateral agreements \nentered into by the Government of Mauritius, if any, to ensure the security of the Indian \nOcean and, if so, give details thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSAINT LOUIS POWER PLANT – TURBINES PROCUREMENT – CORRUPTION \nALLEGATIONS – ARRESTS & INTERROGATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/410",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 410,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "B/410\nThe Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,   \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands – \n \nWhether, in regard to the project for the construction of a new \nrunway at Plaine Corail Airport, in Rodrigues, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from Airports of Mauritius Co. \nLtd., information as to where matters stand?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/411",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 411,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/411) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the inquiry \ninitiated into allegations of corruption in relation to the procurement of turbines for the Saint \nLouis Power Plant of the Central Electricity Board, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain information as to where matters stand, indicating the names of the persons arrested and \ninterrogated under caution in connection therewith as at to date.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD – DEPUTY CEO (MR S.M.) – \nAPPOINTMENT & CONTRACT RENEWAL",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/412",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 412,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "B/412\nThe Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine \nMagnien (Mr Apollon) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,   \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands – \n \nWhether, in regard to aircrafts, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from Air Mauritius Ltd., information as to the \nnumber thereof (a) currently in operation under rental, \ngiving details thereof in each case and (b) ordered for \npurchase/rental, indicating the expected delivery dates and \ngiving details thereof in each case?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/413",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 413,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/413) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mr. S. M., Deputy \nChief Executive Officer of the Economic Development Board, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to – \n (a)  his date of appointment and the terms and conditions thereof, and \n (b)  the circumstances under which his contract was renewed, indicating the terms and \nconditions of his new contract.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nHUMAN TRAFFICKING – REPORTED CASES & COMBAT MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/414",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 414,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/414) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to human trafficking, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of reported cases thereof over the past two years indicating the number of \nprosecutions initiated in connection therewith and the outcomes thereof, and  \n(b) \nadditional measures taken or being envisaged to combat same, indicating the \nmechanisms put in place for the protection of the victims thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nREPUBLIC OF CONGO (BRAZZAVILLE) – OFFICIAL VISIT – OUTCOME \n\n114",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/415",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 415,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/415) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to his recent \nofficial visit to the Republic of Congo (Brazzaville), he will state the outcome thereof, \nindicating the bilateral meetings held in connection therewith.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nCHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO – PROPOSED SOVEREIGNTY TRANSFER –\nCONSULTATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/416",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 416,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/416) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the proposed agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great \nBritain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the Republic of Mauritius concerning \nthe transfer of sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia, and the \nreported shelving thereof by the United Kingdom, he will state whether he proposes to have \nconsultations with the President of the United States with a view to securing his approval for \nthe said transfer of sovereignty to Mauritius.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PNQ) \nRACING DOPING CASE – MR D. S. – INQUIRY & OUTCOME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/417",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 417,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/417) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the case \nof Mr D. S. tested positive for cocaine following a test carried out on or about 18 October \n2025, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Gambling Regulatory Authority, \ninformation as to whether the Racing Stewards of the Horse Racing Integrity and Doping \nUnit has initiated an inquiry thereinto and, if so, indicate the outcome thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGOLDEN VISA SCHEME – PROPOSED INTRODUCTION – POTENTIAL \nSUCCESS & RISKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/418",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 418,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand’ Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/418) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nproposed introduction of the Golden Visa Scheme, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Economic Development Board, \ninformation as to – \n(i) \nwhether the potential success and risks thereof particularly, regarding \ncompliance with the Financial Action Task Force standards, and  \n(ii) \nthe estimated yearly number of Residence Permits to be issued thereunder \nhave been assessed, and  \n(b) \nstate whether same will represent an accelerated pathway to permanent residence \nor Mauritian citizenship.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nAIRPORT HOLDINGS LTD. – STRATEGIC PARTNERS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/419",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 419,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/419) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Air Mauritius Ltd., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nwhether Airport Holdings Ltd. is seeking a strategic partner therefor and, if so, where matters \nstand, indicating the names of any shortlisted partners.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nNEW COURT HOUSE – MAINTENANCE CONTRACT – DETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/420",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 420,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/420) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nInformation Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in regard to the \ndeployment and adoption of the SuperApp KOREK in Rodrigues Island, he will state –  \n(a) \nthe measures being envisaged to encourage the uptake and accessibility thereof \nfor residents and institutions thereat; \n(b) \nthe timeframe for the implementation or expansion thereof, and \n(c) \nwhether any budgetary allocation has been earmarked in support thereof, \nparticularly in respect of capacity-building.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I will be replying to PQ B/420, \nPQ B/466 together as they pertain to the same subject. Madam Speaker, the blueprint for \nMauritius 2025/2029 is the strategic documents that recommends under the first pillar, the \nfoundation of the state-of-the-art info structure. The implementation of an App that is built \naround life events to deliver simple and reliable, government to citizen, government to \nbusiness and government to government services. \nThese document, Madam Speaker, is a reflection of the vision of the Ministry and \nunlike the previous regime, those documents do not just find their way in drawers, they do get \nimplemented. The App KOREK is one such implementation. In this context, the App \nKOREK has been established with the aim of consolidating fragmented government \napplications that consumed in the past, a lot of public funds with no value to the public – but \nnow there is value that the public is deriving – that has been consolidated into a single \nwindow for all the users of our Republic. \nIt will eventually evolve into a fully-fledged SuperApp which will be based around the \nwhole of government concept. So, every transaction what a person needs to do with the \ngovernment from birth till the last day – whether it is about education, health, local \nauthorities, permits, all those will ultimately be available in SuperApp and we have started \nthat work already and these are bringing cost savings, citizen trust and convenience to \ncitizens as well. \nTherefore, KOREK represents a paradigm shift toward a proactive government, Madam \nSpeaker, that anticipates citizen’s needs rather than reacting to their requests. This approach \nstrengthens social inclusion in public institutions and demonstrates government’s \ncommitment to leaving no one behind in our digital journey. \nThe first version, Madam Speaker, was made available on 30 January 2026 with the \ndetails of driving license and the digital Penalty Point System which we worked on together \nwith the hon. Osman Mahomed and that gives citizens the possibility of them, online in real \ntime consulting the number of penalty points in case there is any that we have acquired \nthrough road traffic offences. \nAt my Ministry, we have set a target of making available at least one new government, \nnew service on KOREK every month. The last two services added on 03 April 2026, are, \nfirstly, information that comes straight from the power grid of the Central Electricity Board \nand it provides color coding – red, yellow or green. So, people will understand real-time, any \nactions they need to take at home in order to optimize the use of power in currently difficult \ntimes.  \nWe have also added Government Information Service, vacancies which are now \ncentralised on the mobile App so that people seeking jobs find it easier to come onto the \nmobile phones and to find all jobs advertised in the public and in parastatal sectors. \nWith the help of my colleague. hon. Reza Uteem, we will soon also be making it \npossible for them to apply online through their mobile phones. The next addition will be the \nreporting of serious water leakages – we all know that we have a serious problem with that – \nand potholes on roads that could be safety hazards and lead to accidents. \nTherefore, Madam Speaker, there are series of services that have been added and more \nwill be added and this is phase 1. My Ministry is taking several measures to promote the \nuptake and accessibility of the application among residents and institutions and these include: \ntargeted awareness campaigns and collaboration with the Mauritius Digital Promotion \nAgency together with SILWF centers under hon. Ms Navarre-Marie. The colleges as well \nworking with the inhabitants of the surroundings with the local authorities and various \nstakeholders so that we are able to touch a maximum number of people. There are so far, 406 \n000 Mauritians using this App, Madam Speaker, and we are actively pursuing further \nonboarding. \nFurthermore, with respect to the deployment and adoption in Rodrigues Island, I wish \nto inform the House that a visit is planned in the coming days and to this end, my Ministry is \nliaising with relevant authorities in Rodrigues to plan engagement sessions to empower local \nambassadors which so far has 3,058 users of this App in Rodrigues and we intend to replicate \nthe same approach that we have taken in Mauritius for Rodrigues Island as well. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Lukeeram? No?  \nHon. Ms Collet?  \nOkay, great, let us do one more. \nHon. Second Member for Mahebourg… Oh, sorry! I do not see. You must ask the \nverbally. \nYes, please! \nMr Edouard: Thank you, Madam Speaker, may I ask the hon. Minister, if he is aware \nthat there are incorrect entries sometimes and how he intends to address these? \nMadam Speaker: Incorrect? \nDr. Ramtohul: Incorrect entries with respect to which service hon. Member, please? \nMr Edouard: The application concerning the residents, the data is sometimes incorrect \n– they do not give full information about what is on the application? \nDr. Ramtohul: Thank you for the supplementary question. There are different types of \nservices which pertain to different ministries. For example, the Ministry of Transport, the \nCivil Status Division and others. \nTherefore, in case of any discrepancy being identified, my request would be for the \nperson to actually notify the relevant ministry, and I am sure there is a process for them to \naddress that. We only use data that is available in those ministries. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Are you happy, hon. Edouard? \nMr Edouard: Yes, very happy. \nMadam Speaker: May I propose that we do another question. Let me see. \nSo, now we are going to Second Member for Mahebourg. That is what I have said. Yes! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 12 – DAMAGED ROAD SIGNS – REPAIR & \nREINSTATEMENT WORKS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/421",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 421,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/421) Mr  T. Apollon (Second Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport  whether, in regard to the road signs reportedly \ndamaged, faded or not clearly visible in Constituency No. 12, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to the number  thereof, indicating whether consideration will be \ngiven for the urgent carrying out of repair and reinstatement works thereof and the timeframe \nset therefor.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Madam Speaker, following the last general elections, the \nportfolio of maintenance of road traffic signs and road markings has been entrusted to my \nMinistry. \nAs per section 28 of the Roads Act, the maintenance of existing traffic signs and road \nmarkings falls under the purview of the highway authority, that is, the Road Development \nAuthority for classified roads and that of local authorities for urban and rural roads – road C, \nfor example. \nConcurrently, maintenance of road signs is currently undertaken by the RDA, the local \nauthorities and TRMSU of my Ministry. Accordingly, I have been informed that the RDA \nhad carried out inspections on roads falling under its purview in the district of Grand Port \ncovering also Constituency No.12 and it has been observed that out of some 233 traffic \nsigns,78 were found to be defective, either damage or faded. \nIn August 2025, works order for the amount of Rs1.075 million was granted by the \nRDA under the framework agreement for maintenance and minor works for the reinstatement \nof traffic signs. As at date, all the 78 defective traffic signs have been replaced.  \nMadam Speaker, according to information obtained from the Ministry of Local \nGovernment, 250 defective or worn-out road signs have been surveyed by the District \nCouncil of Grand Port are non-classified within its administrative jurisdiction of \nConstituency No.12. \nThe estimated costs for the replacement of these road signs and posts amounts to \nRs248,000. Works which will be undertaken by the in-house labour of the District Council \nGrand Port are expected to be completed within three months subject to funds being made \navailable. \nMadam Speaker, I am further informed by the TMRSU that the latter has worked out a \nroad safety inspection report, whereby the following roads within Constituency No. 12 have \nbeen included for maintenance of traffic signs by the TMRSU – \n(i) \nA10 – Phoenix to Plaisance Road: 24.4 kilometres; \n(ii) \nB81 – Junction Road: 3.3 kilometres; \n(iii) B7 – Deux Bras Road: 10.5 kilometres, and \n(iv) La Barraque Road: 13.2 kilometres. \nMy Ministry has already approached the Ministry of Finance for the required funding to be \nmade available in the next financial year, for implementation of these projects. Also to avoid \nduplication of works, the Local Authorities, RDA and TMRSU hold joint site visits to agree \non the appropriate course of action to be undertaken.  \nI have to also stress Madam Speaker, that the maintenance of road signs is an ongoing \nexercise to ensure road safety and proper traffic management. Signs are often damaged due to \nroad accidents and in some cases, acts of vandalism. I have also therefore requested the \nTMRSU to carry out regular inspections and initiate prompt repairs to keep signage visible, \nlegible and effective at all times. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nMr Apollon: Je remercie le ministre. Comme le ministre vient de le dire, il y a une \ngrosse confusion même parmi les députés pour savoir quelle route doit être faite par le \nDistrict Council, quelle route doit être faite par le TMRSU. Est-ce qu’à l’avenir nous pourrons \ndiscuter avec les autorités concernées pour faire qu’une seule autorité qui s’occupe des signs \nsur la route ? Parce que là on parle des accidents qui arrivent souvent, parce qu’on ne sait pas \nsi c’est le District Council ou TMRSU qui doit s’occuper des road signs. Merci. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes, you mentioned TMRSU and Local Authorities but there is \nalso the RDA. I tend to agree with you but ultimately, my Ministry is responsible for \ncoordination because like I said, after the elections of 2024, this portfolio has been entrusted \nto my Ministry. \nMadam Speaker: The question was how are people going to deal with this, given that \nthere are three different. How do they give? Through you? Through the Ministry? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Ministry of Land Transport. \nMadam Speaker: Through the Ministry, you have got it. Okay, maybe we can have \none last question, hon. Third Member for Rodrigues! Yes, hon. Ms Henriette-Manan? \nMAURITIUS FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICE & RODRIGUES FIRE AND RESCUE \nSERVICE – FIREFIGHTERS – TRANSFER REQUESTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/422",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 422,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/422) Ms D. Henriette-Manan (Third Member for Rodrigues) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the transfer of firefighters between the \nMauritius Fire and Rescue Service and the Rodrigues Fire and Rescue Service since 2022 to \ndate, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number of requests \ntherefor received and the number thereof acceded to.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Madam Speaker, at the very outset, I wish to refer the hon. Member to \nthe reply to Parliamentary Question B/303 dated 08 April 2025, which clearly sets out the \nlegal and constitutional framework governing transfers between the Mauritius Fire and \nRescue Service and the Rodrigues Fire and Rescue Service. With regard to the specific \nquestion, I am informed that since 2022 to date, no request for transfer has been recorded and \nconsequently, no transfer has been effected.  \nFor completeness, Madam Speaker, prior to 2022, a total of 13 requests was received in \n2019 from firefighters of Rodriguan origin, along with one individual request in 2021 and the \nreconsideration request in April 2025. However, none of these requests were acceded to, and \ntherefore, no permanent transfer has taken place. \nMadam Speaker, this situation must be understood within the existing legal and \nconditional framework. Under the Rodrigues Regional Assembly Act 2006, the Rodrigues \nRegional Assembly is established as a separate body, corporate with responsibility for the fire \nservices in Rodrigues. Consequently, distinct civil establishment orders exist for Mauritius \nand Rodrigues, creating two independent establishments, each with its own staffing structure, \nbudgetary provision and administrative authority. Furthermore, under the Disciplined Forces \nService Commission Regulation which governs the condition of service of firefighters, there \nis no provision for permanent transfers between these two establishments. Any such transfer \nwould therefore require a specific legal basis which does not exist actually. \nMadam Speaker, in addition to this legal constraint, any transfer would raise practical \nconsideration, including the availability of vacancies in Rodrigues, alignment of rank and \nseniority, operational requirements of the Mauritius Fire and Rescue Service and the \nconfluence of the relevant institutional bodies. I am further informed that this matter has been \nsubject to consultation with the Disciplined Forces Service Commission, the Public Service \nCommission and the Office of the Attorney General, and the Prime Minister’s Office and \nremained under consideration at policy level as it would necessitate appropriate legislative \nand regulatory amendments. \nMadam Speaker, in the meantime, the Government has adopted a legally compliant and \npractical approach to address the staffing needs in Rodrigues. A recruitment exercise was \nconducted in October 2025, following which, 11 firefighters were recruited, specifically for \nthe Rodrigues Fire and Rescue Service and have already assumed duty in March 2026. It is \nalso noteworthy that one previous applicant for transfer has successfully joined through this \nrecruitment process, in line with the established legal framework. \nSo, Madam Speaker, to conclude, the position is clear. Since 2022 to date, no request \nfor transfer has been recorded. Prior to that period, a total of 13 requests were made. \nHowever, none of these requests were acceded to and consequently, no transfer has taken \nplace. This is due to the absence of legal provisions allowing for permanent transfers between \nthe two distinct establishments under the current legislative and regulatory framework. Thank \nyou. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Ms Henriette-Manan, fine? I am going to give her \nfirst. \nMr François: Oh, okay. No, that is fine. \nMadam Speaker: C’est moi qui décide. \nMr François: No, I did not realise. That is fine, Madam Speaker. \nMs Henriette-Manan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Can the hon. Minister confirm to \nthis House whether his Ministry envisages the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding \nregarding those matters concerning the Mauritius Fire and Rescue Service running in \nMauritius and running in Rodrigues, please? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Minister? \nMr Woochit: Madam Speaker, I just answered. So, all depends on the extensive \nconsultation involving the Disciplined Forces Service Commission, Public Service \nCommission, Office of the Attorney General, and the Prime Minister’s Office. It is not in my \nMinistry but we have already made the request. It is under consideration. \nMadam Speaker: But you will use your good offices with all the ministries concerned. \nMr Woochit: Of course. We have already requested for it. Yes. \nMadam Speaker: Of course. I thought that was it, yes. \nMr François: I have a very important question, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: On va tomber là. \nMr François: My question is, I listened well to the hon. Minister – if those firefighters \nwho are on the Mauritian establishment applied at the Rodrigues Regional Assembly level \nand they are recruited thereat, can your Ministry see to it that if they get the job thereat, they \ncarry their years of service with them? Is that possible? Do you see what I am saying? So, \nthose firefighters who are here and have ten years of service, if they apply at the Regional \nAssembly level and they are recruited thereat, is it possible for them not to lose their years of \nservice in Mauritius? \nMadam Speaker: Is that a problem, hon. Minister? \nMr Woochit: No, because they… I just told that… \nMadam Speaker: Do you know the reply? \nMr Woochit: No, no. No, I know the reply. I know the reply! Because there is no such \nlegal impediment on this actually. No such legal impediment prevails actually. \nMadam Speaker: You mean that if they go to Rodrigues, they carry on their years of \nservice? That is what he is asking. \nMr Woochit: We can look into it. \nMadam Speaker: What I suggest is that once you have heard this, you take time and \nthen you will tell us. \nMr Woochit: Okay. \nMadam Speaker: Parce que c’est important. Thank you very much everybody. I raise \nthe Sitting for one and a half hour. \nAt 1.04 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.37 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Please be seated! \nHon. Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac! \nPOST OFFICES – RENOVATION & CLOSURE PLANS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/423",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 423,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/423) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation \nwhether, in regard to the post offices, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nMauritius Posts Ltd. and table the list thereof earmarked for renovation or permanent closure \nand in respect of the latter, indicate the – \n(a) \nreasons therefor, and  \n(b) \nalternative measures being envisaged for the residents of the localities concerned \ntherewith in relation to the services provided by same.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with your permission, I would like to refer to \nreplies given to previous PQs, wherein I highlighted the difficult financial situation of \nMauritius Post Ltd.  \nIn reply to PQ B/424, from hon. Babajee, for the Sitting of 06 May 2025, I informed the \nHouse, among others, of the deficits being faced by Mauritius Post Ltd. and outlined the main \nreasons behind this situation. Subsequently, in my reply to PQ B/515, from hon. Beejan, for \nthe Sitting of 13 May 2025, I, again, drew attention to the financial challenges being faced by \nMPL, and referred to an internal audit report which revealed that there were post offices \noperating at a loss.  \nI also informed the House that MPL was working on a turnaround plan, focusing on \nreviewing its business model, creating new revenue streams, restructuring its human \nresources and improving operational efficiency. The financial situation of MPL, today, \nremains challenging. However, corrective measures are being implemented in a phased \nmanner and these are expected to progressively improve the performance of the organisation. \nI am informed that following an assessment, MPL has identified post offices that are \ncurrently operating at a loss. While the option of closing these post offices had initially been \nconsidered as a cost saving measure, consideration has been given to the fact that closure is \nnot the preferred course of action. Accordingly, closure of these post offices, as at date, is not \nconclusive. Instead, as a policy measure, MPL has been exploring the possibility of \nrepurposing these outlets under new business models while ensuring continuity of postal \nservice delivery. \nThe above, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, addresses part (a) of the question. In light of this \nresponse, part (b) of the question does not arise. Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien! \nMAHEBOURG MUSEUM – RENOVATION WORKS & RE-OPENING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/424",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 424,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/424) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the Mahebourg Museum, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the expected re-opening date thereof, \ngiving details of the renovation works which have been or will be carried out thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Gondeea: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the National History Museum of Mahebourg, \nwhich is a national heritage building dated back to the French colonial period, had to be \nclosed by my Ministry in December 2025 for renovation works as its roof had reached an \nadvanced stage of deterioration with water ingress during rainy weather.  \nIt is regrettable that no substantive action was taken by the previous government despite \nclear and repeated signs of deterioration over many years to preserve this important heritage \nasset, apart from the installation of a trampoline over the roof to prevent water ingress. This \ntemporary measure proved ineffective, and rainwater infiltration over time has significantly \ndamaged the timber structure of the building, thereby necessitating comprehensive renovation \nworks. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in December 2025, during the cyclonic season, the museum \nwas closed and all artefacts were relocated to safer locations in other museums under the \nMauritius Museum Council. I wish to highlight that, initially, due to budgetary constraints, \nmy Ministry had envisaged to carry out the roofing works in the first instance. However, \nfollowing a reassessment of the overall condition of the building, my Ministry is now \nconsidering a comprehensive renovation of the museum instead of a phased approached as \nthis would be more sustainable and beneficial in the long term. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the scope of works which would, inter alia, comprise a \ncomplete rehabilitation of the museum, re-roofing, replacement of wooden structure and \ntimber openings and its estimated cost are currently being worked out and will be taken into \nconsideration in the context of budget preparation. Once the tender is finalised, launched and \nawarded, the renovation works are expected to take approximately one year to be completed.  \nThe museum’s scenography, on its part, will be worked out simultaneously with the \nassistance of the French Government, in line with the agreement signed on the protection and \npreservation of our heritage buildings. Accordingly, at this stage, it will be difficult for me to \ngive an indication of the date of the re-opening as this will depend on the completion of all \nthe procurement processes. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the objective is not merely to re-open the museum, but to \nrestore it as a modern, resilient and nationally significant heritage institution. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes! \nSODNAC WELLNESS PARK & FARQUHAR RECREATIONAL PARK – STRAY \nDOGS – SAFETY MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-april-2026"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/425",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 425,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/425) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the persistent presence of stray dogs at the Sodnac Wellness Park and the Farquhar \nRecreational Park, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Society for \nAnimal Welfare, information as to the measures being envisaged in relation thereto, including \nensuring the safety of the persons visiting the said parks and the welfare of the dogs.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, hon. Member. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, nice to see \nyou in the Chair. Welcome back! \nI am informed by the Mauritius Society for Animal Welfare that in response to \nconcerns regarding stray dogs at Sodnac Wellness Park and Farquhar Recreational Park, no \nless than 10 interventions were carried out around the area of Sodnac Wellness Park and \nQuatre Bornes. Furthermore, the Director of MSAW had a meeting with the Mayor of the \nMunicipal Council of Quatre Bornes, the councillors and local dog feeders to address the \nsituation of stray dogs in the area. That meeting was held on 11 December 2025.  \nA key outcome of the meeting was the identification of unused State land that could be \nconverted into dog sanctuaries to facilitate the relocation of stray dogs. Land has already been \nidentified at Riche Lieu for construction of a dog shelter, and the Engineering Unit of my \nMinistry is working on the design and technical drawing of the shelter. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, to tackle the issue of stray dogs at Sodnac Wellness Park as \nwell as Farquhar Recreational Park and to ensure that the parks remain protected, the \nMauritius Society for Animal Welfare will be sterilising the dogs thereat, and where \nappropriate, these dogs will be released under the Catch Neuter Release Programme.  \nAlso, well-meaning but misguided people feeding the dogs near the parks will be asked \nto relocate the feedings spot to avoid gathering of dogs. Dogs exhibiting aggressive or \ndangerous behaviour have been managed separately and will be managed if ever they are \ncalled upon to address this issue to save separately, to safeguard the safety of park visitors \nand staff.  \nThe Mauritius Society for Animal Welfare alone cannot ensure the safety of persons \nvisiting the park, other concerned stakeholders should also provide assistance as follows – \n• The security personnel have been requested to remain vigilant at all times to \nprevent entry of dogs and neighbouring residents have been informed and \nsensitised to ensure that their pet dogs are properly controlled and not allowed \nto roam freely; \n• The Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change \nhas agreed to the inspection of fencing – it’s well-fenced, I must say it but \naround the park except there are a few holes here and there that have to be \nrepaired – to restrain dogs from entering and using these apertures; \n• Community cooperation is vital to reducing the stray dog population, not only in \nand around the park but also around the island. \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, M. le président. Je remercie le ministre pour sa \nréponse. Le ministre peut-il indiquer à la Chambre du calendrier prévu pour la relocalisation \ndes chiens errant vers les nouveaux refuges compte tenu du danger que représente ces chiens \nqui poursuivent les marcheurs dans les deux parcs ? Merci. \nDr. Boolell: It’s difficult to give a specific reply but my hon. friend can understand that \nmuch is being done to address the problem despite the limited resources which MSAW has. \nBut we need to appeal to one and all. I am also appealing to those who have dogs that \nwhenever they take their dogs out to make sure that it’s on leash. Most of the stray dogs are \ndue to the fact that, you know, as citizens, we don’t also live up to our expectation but we \nhave identified sites. You know, one of those sites identified is Richelieu where those dogs \ncan be transferred and relocated. \nMs Anquetil: Une dernière question, s’il vous plait ? \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, last one! \nMs Anquetil: Une petite, merci. Je vous remercie, M. le président. After the relocation \nof the dogs, will the hon. Minister state what services will be provided in the new shelters to \nensure the welfare of the animals? Thank you. \nDr. Boolell: You can rest assured that welfare of animals is of great concern to one and \nall. You just have to refer to the provisions of the legislations and whoever fails to live up to \nexpectation can be subject to a maximum fine. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière! \nASSOCIATION MAURICIENNE DE BADMINTON – MANAGING \nCOMMITTEE – DISSOLUTION & COMPOSITION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/426",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 426,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/426) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the interim committee set up by his \nMinistry following the dissolution of the Managing Committee of the Association \nMauricienne de Badminton on 10 March 2026, he will state the composition thereof, \nindicating the criteria for the selection and appointment of the said members.",
      "answer": "Mr Nagalingum: Mr Deputy Speaker, my Ministry dissolved the Managing Committee \nof the Mauritius Badminton Association on the 10 March 2026 pursuant to section 9 (9) of \nthe Sports Act 2016. In accordance with section 9 (9) (c) (ii) of the Sports Act 2016, a \nTemporary Committee, and not an interim committee as stated by the hon. Member, has been \nset up. The mandate of the temporary committee is to organise fresh election within three \nmonths. By way of a letter dated 10 March 2026, my Ministry informed the Mauritius \nOlympic Committee of its decision to dissolve the Managing Committee of the Mauritius \nBadminton Association. It was further consulted the Mauritius Olympic Committee with \nrespect to the setting up of a Temporary Committee pursuant to section 9 (9) (c) (ii) of the \nSports Act 2016.  \nIn that spirit, my Ministry invited the Mauritius Olympic Committee to nominate one \nperson to serve as a member on the Temporary Committee. On 18 March 2026, I even had a \nmeeting with the president of the Mauritius Olympic Committee and on that same day, the \nlatter informed my Ministry that they had referred the matter to the legal department of the \nInternational Olympic Committee. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, on 31 March 2026, the Mauritius Olympic Committee \ninformed my Ministry of its decision not to participate in the Temporary Committee for the \ntime being unless so agreed by the International Olympic Committee. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the temporary committee is chaired by Mr Nicolas Boli, the \nlatter is a member of the board of Directors of the Mauritius Multi-Sports Infrastructure Ltd. \nThe two other members are as follows – \n• Mr Soudesh Kumar Appadoo is the Acting Assistant Director of Sport at my \nMinistry and is a desk officer for badminton, and \n• Mrs Ragini Junkeesaw Sunjhoreea is an Acting Principal Inspector of \nAssociations; \nMr Emrith, a Sports Officer from my Ministry, is the Secretary. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that there are no established criteria \nunder the present legislation for the selection and appointment of the members of a \nTemporary Committee, that is, being said the overriding criterion is the availability and \ncommitment of the members to make arrangement for the holding of election within three \nmonths of a fully-fledged new Managing Committee. I repeat myself, Mr Deputy Speaker, \nthat there are no established criteria under the present legislation for the selection and \nappointment of the members of a Temporary Committee. \nMr Quirin: M. le président, avec votre permission. L’honorable ministre peut-il dire à \nla Chambre pourquoi il s’obstine à nommer des activistes politiques à des postes \ndécisionnelles ? Alors que nous savons tous qu’il faut à tout prix éviter de mélanger le sport à \nla politique ou la politique au sport et là je fais référence à la nomination de M. Nicolas Boli \nen tant que Chairperson, président du comité temporaire dont l’honorable ministre lui-même \nvient de nous informer ? \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Minister! \nMr Nagalingum: Yes, Mr Deputy Speaker, that being said, there is nothing that \nprevents a person who is active in politics to be involved in sports as well. When a person is \nchairing the Temporary Committee, there is no political affiliation or not but is doing its job \nindependently. \nMr Quirin: M. le président, je ne comprends pas comment peut-on au niveau du Sports \nAct, il est stipulé que les activistes politiques, que les personnes engagées en politique n’ont \npas le droit d’être des membres et de présider une fédération et là, par rapport à un comité \ntemporaire, un caretaker committee, qui va supposément remettre en ordre toute une \nfédération de badminton… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question! \nAn hon. Member: It’s a statement! \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question, please! \nMr Quirin: Guet to zafer twa! \nCeci dit, M. le président, le ministre est-il au courant que la Badminton World \nFederation qui est la fédération internationale de badminton reconnaît toujours le comité \ndissout par le ministère des sports et lui confère même le pouvoir d’engager des athlètes dans \ndes compétitions internationales et avec votre permission, M. le président, je dépose une \ncopie de la lettre adressée au président sortant de la fédération de badminton par le président \ndu World Badminton Association ? \nMr Nagalingum: I don’t really get your question exactly what you want to ask. Put \nyour question straight and I am going to answer you. \nMr Quirin: My question is very straight, M. le président. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, put a straight question! \nMr Quirin: Je demande à l’honorable ministre, est-ce qu’il est au courant que la \nBadminton World Federation qui est l’instance suprême du badminton au niveau \ninternational, cette instance reconnaît toujours le comité qui a été dissous et lui confère, à ce \ncomité, le pouvoir d’engager des athlètes dans des compétitions internationales ? Est-ce que \nl’honorable ministre est au courant, a-t-il pris connaissance de la lettre qui est parvenue au \nprésident sortant de la fédération de badminton ? \nMr Nagalingum : Je suis au courant. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The next question. Hon. Second Member for Grand Baie & \nPoudre d’Or. \nKINGS ROAD, GOODLANDS – NEW CENTRALISED TAXI STAND – STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/427",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 427,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/427) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the proposed setting up of a new \ncentralised taxi stand in Goodlands, he will state whether a plot of State land located at Kings \nRoad, in Goodlands has been earmarked therefor and, if so, indicate where matters stand \nregarding the vesting of the said land therefor.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mohamed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the NLTA that \npresently, there is no designated taxi stand in Goodlands. Taxis with base of operation at \nGoodlands and adjoining localities of Goodlands, operate from side roads to the royal roads, \nwhich serve as passenger generating catchment areas.  \nI am also informed that following a request from the Riviere du Rempart District \nCouncil, a joint site visit was carried out on 08 October 2025 at Plateau Road, Goodlands, in \nthe presence of the three elected members of the Constituency No. 6 to consider the creation \nof a taxi stand thereat to accommodate taxis currently operating in the locality.  \nHowever, the proposal was not retained as the road is relatively narrow with a width of \napproximately 4.6 metres and is also used by 30-seater buses operating along route 187, \nMelle Jeanne to Bel-Mont traffic centre.  \nThe NLTA is not in the presence of any proposal for a taxi stand at Kings Road, \nGoodlands, which is part of the question. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, according to the NLTA, \nthere are l07 taxis licensed in the area of Goodlands with different designated bases of \noperations. Appointing an official taxi stand in accordance with section 103 of the Road \nTraffic Act, will entail operational issues as it will exclude 35 taxi operators licensed at \nadjoining bases in Goodlands. This is the principle, actually. Those places are Atlas Road, \nBois Rouge, CEB Road and Melle Jeanne for accessing the facility. This will give rise to \nconstant source of dispute and ongoing friction between those based in Goodlands and those \nnot based in the main village. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that there is a plot of state land of an extent of \n757.7 m2 at Kings Road about 50 metres from the main road which is vested in the Prime \nMinister’s Office currently. I am further informed by the District Council of Rivière du \nRempart that the road is narrow, 4 metres wide instead of 6 metres. The more so it is served \nby feeder buses and has no reserves which causes accessibility issues and is therefore not \nsuitable for taxi stand parking thereat. I can table the letter for the information of the hon. \nMember, the one from the District Council of Rivière du Rempart.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay. Table that. Finished? \nMr Osman Mohamed: To end, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I invite the hon. members to \npursue consultation at their level and identify a suitable plot of land at Goodlands following \nwhich, the NLTA will be requested to have a joint site visit with the stakeholders concerned \nnamely the TRMSU and the police to access the viability of the site and feasibility of the \nproject.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay. Supplementary.  \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Still on Kings Road in Goodlands? The Minister has taken quite \na bit… \nMr Beejan: Exactly. Will the hon. Minister inform the House, in view of Goodlands \ntaxi current corners at Plateau Road, Goodlands, Atlas Road Goodlands, Arya Mandir Road, \nGoodlands and even near police station which are high demand areas, if we can conduct a site \nvisit together with you and relevant authorities at the soonest possible? \nMr Osman Mohamed: Yes, I will be very pleased to do that. Last week, I attended a \nsite visit at your neighbour, Constituency No. 7. I will be very glad to do that.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue. \nMr A. Duval: Thank you Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. It is good to have you back by the \nway. Glad to see you. B/ 428. \nTELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERCEPTION & MONITORING – COURT \nORDERS – EXECUTION MECHANISMS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/428",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 428,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/428) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Attorney-General whether, in regard to the interception and monitoring of \ntelecommunications, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the \nnumber of Court Orders issued by the Supreme Court of Mauritius in relation thereto since \nJanuary 2025 to date, indicating the – \n (a) number thereof executed, and \n (b) mechanism in place for the execution thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Glover: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as the House would know, for a court order to be \nissued, there must be an application made for such a court order. And, in view of the subject \nmatter of the question, it is clear that such court orders would only be applied for by \ninvestigative agencies.  \nNow, the hon. Whip of the Opposition must know, as a law practitioner, that all such \napplications are usually made before the judge in Chambers, the more so ex parte so that it \nwould be impossible for the information sought to be obtained.  \nFurthermore, the question seeks to have information about operational issues at the \nlevel of investigative agencies like the police and the FCC and my view is that there is no \nministerial responsibility to answer such a question as it relates to operational issues \npertaining to these agencies.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the House may wish to note that by virtue of Section 161 of \nthe FCC Act, no information relating to any investigation can be divulged and the exception \nprovided for under the law would not apply to parliamentary questions.  \nMoreover, it is worthy to mention, also, that under section 13(1) of the FCC Act, even \nthe Parliamentary Committee which includes members of Parliament is precluded from \nseeking information regarding any investigation.  \nMr A. Duval: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my question relates to the functioning, the \nmechanism in place as to the implementation of Judges’ Order. As the Attorney General, can \nhe enlighten us as to how, in practice, Judges’ Order is effectively adhered to by whichever \ninstitution that maybe when it comes to interference and the monitoring? \nMr Glover: The answer remains the same; it is an operational issue and we are not \ngoing to divulge any information regarding operational issues at the level of investigative \nagencies. Le secret de l’instruction, M. le président, est d’une importance capitale.  \nMr A. Duval: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, may I ask… \nThe Deputy Speaker: If you have a specific case, … \nMr A. Duval: Yes, I am not going to argue with the hon. Attorney General and seek \nthe answer that he is not going to give. However, what I am going to ask the hon. Attorney \nGeneral is, I will refer him to the statement here made by the hon. Prime Minister with regard \nto acknowledging that there has been a monitoring of telephone conversation and that the said \nsystem had been shut down. That was the assurances given in this House during the answer to \nmy own question in PQ B/6 dated 04 February 2025.  \nIn light of this, I would like to ask the hon. Attorney General, whether, yes or no, has \nthe system been shut down and are Judges’ Orders thus being implemented or not in light of \nthe statement? \nMr Glover: There are two questions within one. I will answer the first part of it. The \nfirst part is whether the answer given by the hon. Prime Minister to PQ B/6 and thereafter PQ \nB/15 is still true today and the answer is yes.  \nMr A. Duval: The last question.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: You have had enough.  \nMr A. Duval: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, one last question? \nThe Deputy Speaker: No. \nHon. Ms J. Bérenger.  \nRENEWABLE ENERGY HYBRID FACILITIES PROJECTS – SPV 30MW \nBELLE VUE 2 & 3 LTD – POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/429",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 429,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floréal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/429) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the \nMinister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the Renewable Energy Hybrid \nFacilities projects in respect of SPV 30MW Belle Vue 2 Ltd. and SPV 30MW Belle Vue 3 \nLtd., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Electricity Board, \ninformation as to whether – \n(a) \nthere has been any breach of their Power Purchase Agreements due to delays, \nunmet Conditions Precedent and repeated changes of site; \n(b)   the injection of power at Belle Vue will be maintained in accordance with the \nprovisions thereof, and  \n(c)   the landowners have notified of their intention to legally challenge the wayleaves \nrequested by the said companies.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden : M. le président, je souhaite aborder en priorité la partie (c) de la \nquestion. \nSelon les informations communiquées par le Central Electricity Board, le raccordement \ndes deux projets au sous-station de Belle Vue dépend en grande partie du way-leave sur des \nterrains appartenant à Novaterra. Or, dans une lettre en date du 8 décembre 2025 adressée à \nCorexsolar International (Mauritius) Ltd, et dont copie m’a été transmise, Novaterra a \nclairement signifié son refus d’accorder ces autorisations. Il y est expressément indiqué que \ntoute tentative du promoteur, donc Corexsolar, d’aller de l’avant dans ce sens, se heurtera à \nleur opposition légale. \nM. le président, dans ce contexte, il apparaît que les sociétés Belle Vue 2 Ltd et 30MW \nBelle Vue 3 se trouvent aujourd’hui dans l’incapacité d’obtenir les accès nécessaires, le way-\nleave, ce qui constitue un obstacle sérieux à la concrétisation de ces projets. \nS’agissant de la partie (b) de la question, je suis informé par le Central Electricity \nBoard que, conformément aux dispositions des Power Purchase Agreement (PPA), le \nraccordement de ces deux projets au réseau électrique est prévu au niveau de la sous-station \nde Belle Vue. Je suis également informé que ces dispositions ne feront l’objet d’aucune \nmodification. \nM. le président, s’agissant de la partie (a) de la question, je suis informé que les retards \naccumulés dans ce projet ne relèvent pas du hasard, mais trouvent leur origine dans des \ndécisions contestables, prises sous l’ancien conseil d’administration du Central Electricity \nBoard, alors sous l’autorité du précédent gouvernement. \nEn effet, il apparaît clairement que deux changements successifs de site ont été \napprouvés après l’attribution du contrat, ce qui constitue, à mon avis, une entorse sérieuse à la \nlogique même du processus d’appel d’offres. Le premier déplacement de Belle Vue vers Baie \ndu Tombeau, a été validé le 9 novembre 2023. Le second, de Baie du Tombeau vers Mare \nd’Australia, a été approuvé le 15 avril 2024. \nM. le président, ces décisions prises sans un cadre suffisamment rigoureux et en totale \nrupture avec les paramètres initiaux du projet ont inévitablement désorganisé sa mise en \nœuvre. Elle porte aujourd’hui une responsabilité directe dans les retards constatés et soulève à \njuste titre des sérieuses interrogations quant à la gestion de ce dossier à l’époque. \nM. le président, je suis informé par la Central Electricity Board que les sociétés de \nBelle Vue 2 et Belle Vue 3 n’ont toujours pas rempli les conditions prévues, les conditions \npréalables, donc les conditions precedent dans leur PPA. Donc, ces projets enregistrent des \nretards répétés dans l’obtention de plusieurs autorisations essentielles, notamment – \n• \nPas d’EIA ; \n• \nPas de LCP, et \n• \nPas de BLUP. \nM. le président, ces retards liés à des procédures administratives sont évoqués comme \nrelevant des cas de force majeure au sein des dispositions des PPA. Sur cette base, le \npromoteur a sollicité et a obtenu une déclaration de force majeure pour une durée de six mois, \nsuivie d’une période de look and see d’après les PPA de trois mois. \nJe suis informé que la période de look and see pour le projet de 30 MW de Belle Vue 2 \na pris fin le 31 octobre 2025. Donc, l’année dernière. Tandis que celle relative de 30 MW de \nBelle Vue 3 s’est achevée le 14 avril 2026, il y a quelques jours de cela. Compte tenu de la \nsituation, mon ministère a sollicité et a obtenu, à cinq reprises, l’avis juridique de la State \nLaw Office. Les implications juridiques et financières d’une éventuelle résiliation des contrats \nd’achat d’électricité ont été clairement établies. \nM. le président, à l’heure où je vous parle, plus de trois ans se sont écoulés depuis la \nsignature du PPA en février 2023 entre la Central Electricity Board et Corexsolar \nInternational. Pourtant, le promoteur ne dispose toujours pas d’EIA, du Land Coversion \nPermit, du Building and Land Use Permit ni des wayleaves liées à ces projets. Par ailleurs, la \nfinalisation du financement demeure suspendue à l’obtention de l’ensemble des autorisations. \nM. le président, comme je l’ai indiqué, pour Belle Vue 2 et Belle Vue 3, la majorité des \nwayleaves nécessaires à la mise en œuvre de ces deux projets se situent sur des terrains \nappartenant à Novaterra. À ce jour, les promoteurs n’ont pas obtenu les wayleaves requis \nauprès de Novaterra. \nM. le président, le 1 octobre 2025, le promoteur a invoqué l’article 37A – le promoteur, \nCorexsolar – de la loi sur l’électricité de 2024 afin de tenter d’obtenir ces wayleaves par voie \nlégale. Le 17 octobre 2025, Terra Group et Novaterra ont formellement rejeté la demande de \nwayleave, exprimant une opposition claire, explicite et sans équivoque. Le 17 novembre \n2025, le promoteur a notifié à Terra Group et à Novaterra son intention de saisir l’URA à \ndéfaut d’accord dans un délai de 21 jours. Ce délai a expiré le 7 décembre 2025, l’année \ndernière, sans qu’aucune autorisation n’ait été accordée. \nLe 8 décembre 2025, Novaterra a réitéré son refus catégorique et a confirmé son \nopposition à la demande des wayleaves ainsi qu’à toute démarche ultérieure du promoteur. Le \n6 janvier 2026, cette année, Corexsolar a saisi l’URA. Le 16 janvier 2026, une demande de \ndétermination de wayleave right a été déposée auprès de l’URA. Le dossier est actuellement \nen cours d’examen. \nM. le président, la chronologie que j’ai mise en avant il y a quelque temps, met en \névidence un point central : le refus constant, répété et formalisé du groupe Terra d’accorder \nles wayleaves indispensables à la réalisation des projets. Malgré l’activation des dispositifs \nlégaux et plusieurs démarches successives du promoteur, aucune autorisation n’a été obtenue. \nLes positions de Novaterra ont été claires, répétées et sans ambiguïté avec un refus \nexplicite de toute demande de wayleaves ainsi que de toute démarche ultérieure. Dans ces \nconditions, M. le président, les projets de Belle Vue font face à un obstacle fondamental et \ndéfinitif sur un élément essentiel de leur mise en œuvre. Il ne s’agit plus d’une difficulté \nadministrative, ni d’un différend en cours de règlement, mais d’une impossibilité concrète \nd’obtenir les wayleaves nécessaires au vu du refus maintenu par le propriétaire foncier.  \nDès lors, M. le président, ces projets ne disposent plus de base réelle de réalisation. \nLeur mise en œuvre apparaît compromise de manière structurelle. Ce qui fait que le projet est \nvoué, à mon avis, à une mort naturelle.  \nCeci dit, M. le président, il a été décidé, en toute responsabilité et après un examen \nrigoureux de la situation juridique et contractuelle, de demander de manière générale au \nboard de la Central Electricty Board d’examiner la résiliation de ces deux contrats de \nCorexsolar.  \nIl ne s’agit pas d’une décision prise à la légère. C’est une décision dictée par la réalité \ndes faits, par l’intérêt public et par la nécessité de protéger la crédibilité du système \nénergétique du pays, de la CEB. On parle ici de 60 MW. M. le président, la CEB mettra en \nœuvre les procédures requises conformément aux dispositions prévues dans les PPA. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member! \nMs J. Bérenger: Je remercie l’honorable ministre. Peut-il nous dire combien de \npénalités ont été appliquées jusqu’à l’heure et combien ont été effectivement reçues ? \nMr Assirvaden: Les pénalités qu’on a appliquées jusqu’ici, c’est deux fois R 30 \nmillions. Donc, R 60 millions ont été appliqués. Et là, le promoteur a un dépôt à la CEB, de \nmémoire, autour de...  \nMs J. Bérenger: R 210 million.  \nMr Assirvaden: Autour de ce montant, oui. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes! \nMs J. Bérenger: Est-ce que ce dépôt sera retenu en cas de résiliation du contrat ? \nMr Assirvaden: Je me suis posé la question moi aussi. Le CEB m’a expliqué ; je vous \ndis légalement comment cela va se faire. \nDonc, the CEB shall first issue a notice of intended termination to the promoter. Ce qui \nva être fait si le board prend la décision, comme je l’ai indiqué, ici. The CEB shall grant the \npromoter 15 days’ time to make a representation, selon le PPA. The CEB may, after the end of \nthe 15 days period, whether or not in receipt of such representation, in its sole discretion, \nissue the termination notice. \nPour répondre à votre question, en ce qui concerne the development security, on refer to \nclause 6.2 du PPA qui dit que “Development security is encashed when there is a seller \ndefault and in case of termination due to force majeure, the CEB shall release the \ndevelopment security.” \nDonc, c’est au département légal et le dossier va aller à la SLO pour décider la marche à \nsuivre à ce moment-là. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Last one. \nMs J. Berenger: Une précision pour plus de clarté. La Central Electicity Board \nn’avait-elle pas déjà donné son accord pour issue le notice of termination ? Of intended \ntermination ? \nMr Assirvaden: Non, pas encore.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil! \nDRAMA, MUSIC & ARTS PROMOTION – INFRASTRUCTURE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/430",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 430,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/430) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked \nthe Minister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to drama, music and arts, he will state \nwhether consideration will be given for the setting up of appropriate infrastructure for the \npromotion thereof amongst the youth.",
      "answer": "Mr Gondeea: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in regard to the question, I wish to state \nunequivocally that this Government attaches the highest importance to the development of \nappropriate infrastructure for the promotion of drama, music and the arts amongst our youths. \nIt is true that given the prevailing situation, the construction of a new large-scale \ninfrastructure cannot be undertaken indiscriminately and must be carefully prioritised within \nthe national budgetary framework. However, while the current economic context requires \nprudence, this Government is taking concrete steps to prioritise and sequence projects in a \nresponsible and sustainable manner, unlike in the past, where investments were not always \naligned with national priorities. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, when this Government took office, the arts and culture sector \nwas characterised by years of neglect. Key facilities, including the Serge Constantin Theatre \n(SCT), had remained closed and underutilised for prolonged periods, depriving an entire \ngeneration of young Mauritian of access to proper artistic platform. Decisive actions have \nsince been taken.  \nThe SCT has been partly rehabilitated and reopened in September 2025 and further \ninvestments are going on at both the SCT and Pointe Canon Open Air Theatre to expand \naccess and increase capacity for youth engagement in the arts. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, at the same time, my Ministry is not waiting passively for new \ninfrastructure to materialise. We are actively maximising the use of existing facilities \nincluding the Conservatoire Nationale de Musique Francois Mitterrand Trust Fund and its \nregional branches as well as four Centres de Formation Artistique situated at Paillotte, \nMahebourg, Plaine des Papayes and Bel Air Rivière Sèche whilst continuing to examine how \naccess to artistic training and practice may be further broadened. \nIn that connection, one of the avenues that we will explore is the use of the other \ngovernment buildings and other regional facilities to bring drama, music and arts activities \ncloser to the youth. This matter will be considered more fully in the context of the work of \nthe National Arts Open Commission once set up, so that any such approach forms part of a \ncoherent and sustainable strategy for the sector. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to seize this opportunity here to inform the House that \nmy Ministry has already launched calls for drama Festival in Urdu and English language. The \npreliminaries are due to start in May 2026 with finals in June 2026. \nIn addition, the Centres de Formation Artistique are offering the following courses in \nartistic fields such as music, dance, drama and arts till the end of May 2026 and new courses \nwill start in September 2026. Needful is being done at the level of my Ministry to recruit \nsome 30 additional part-time instructors in all artistic fields to deliver the courses. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me be very clear, the issue at end is not only one of \ninfrastructure but one of national urgency. In a context where our youths are increasingly \nexposed to social ills including drug abuse and delinquency, it would be irresponsible for my \nMinistry and this Government to remain passive. Arts and culture provide structured \nengagement, purpose and discipline and form part of a broader strategy to safeguard our \nyouths and strengthen social cohesion.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Government is also actively pursuing international \npartnerships including with India to secure the provision of musical instruments and technical \nsupport, thereby accelerating access to training without placing undue pressure on public \nfinances. Furthermore, the forthcoming and NAOC will bring for the first time a coherent and \nstrategic direction to the sector, ensuring that future investments in infrastructure are targeted, \nimpactful and aligned with long-term national vision. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this Government is not only committed to building \ninfrastructure when resources permit. It is already delivering results expanding access and \ncorrecting years of systemic neglect. The objective is clear – to ensure that every young \nMauritian with talents in the arts is given the opportunity, the space and the support to \ndevelop their talent. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix! \nVACOAS URBAN TERMINAL PROJECT – CONSTRUCTION – STATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/431",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 431,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/431) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the development and construction of the \nVacoas Urban Terminal Project, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nMunicipal Council of Vacoas-Phoenix, information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to thank the hon. Member for this \nquestion regarding the development and construction of the Vacoas Urban Terminal Project. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that the request for proposals for this project \nwas launched on 13 February 2024 and closed on 14 May 2024. Since the closure of the \nbidding exercise, no letter of award has been issued, no promoter has been selected and no \ncontractual agreement has been entered into. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, for public procurement is governed by the strict principal of \nfairness, transparency, value for money and due diligence. In this context, I wish to \nemphasise that under the Clause 14 of the request for proposal – Government reserves the \nright to amend, vary or withdraw the process at any time without incurring any liability. \nSubsequently, in the absence of any award of contract, there exist no legal obligations \ntowards any bidder nor financial liability accrued to Government. This position is fully in line \nwith established procurement rules and supported by the legal advice. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am aware that correspondence and representations have been \nreceived from interested parties including joint venture entities. However, such exchange \nform part of a normal clarification process in any procurement exercise. They do not \nconstitute any commitment, undertaking or promise to by Government nor do they confer any \nright or entertainment to any party. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the request for proposals set out stringent and comprehensive \nrequirements. Bidders are required to submit preliminary conceptual designs, detailed \nbusiness plans, feasibility studies and financial structures. They must also demonstrate the \nfinancial capacity to mobilise financing of the order of Rs800 million, provide audited \nfinancial statements and annual report for the last five consecutive years and show proven \nexperience in project of similar scale and complexity. \nGiven the magnitude, complexity and financial implication of this project, it would \nhave been premature and contrary to good governance, to proceed with any award without \nensuring full compliance with these requirements and without a thorough evaluation in \naccordance with procurement rules. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Government is therefore also undertaking a comprehensive \nreassessment of the project. This includes ensuring proper integration with National \nTransport Planning Framework, alignment with the requirements of key stakeholders such as \nthe National Land Transport Authority and strict compliance with the bus station and taxi \nstand requirements. It also involves a review of the technical specification and operational \nmodel as well as a reassessment of the financial structure to ensure long-term sustainability \nand value for money. This ongoing process explains why no further updates have been issued \nat this stage to certain stakeholders. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the position is clear. The project has not been cancelled; no \npromoter has been selected – the Government retains for discretion under the request for \nproposal. Any decision to proceed with taken only after the completion of all legal, technical, \nfinancial and administrative evaluation in full compliance with government policies. \n The Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member! \nMr Lobine: Yes. May I ask the hon. Minister in as much as there is no clear-cut policy, \nwhether this is being shelved or you are being ahead with the Vacoas Urban Terminal, may \nwe know the timeframe as to what proposals Government will come forward because in this \nregion, the lands that were being earmarked are being used for the time being to cater for \ntraffic problems within the Vacoas Market Fair. So, is there any clear-cut policy in the near \nfuture for this Vacoas Urban Terminal, whether it is going or not? \nMr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, far from any delay or inaction from the \nMinistry, this matter is being handled with the utmost diligence and responsibility. It will be \nin a very transparent and in the best of the public. By the way, if traffic condition is in \nVacoas, we can clear with the Council, upon availability of fund, we can clear the land for the \nadditional parking space for the market. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay. The hon. Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre \nBornes, carry on! \nNTC – COUNTERFEIT SPARE PARTS PROCUREMENT – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/432",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 432,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/432) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the alleged procurement of \ncounterfeit spare parts by the former management of the National Transport Corporation, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether an inquiry has been \ninitiated thereinto and, if so, indicate where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to first thank the hon. \nMember for her follow-up question on the NTC following PQs B/370 of 15 April 2025 and \nB/430 of 06 May 2005 during which I had replied that the Financial Crimes Commission was \ncarrying out an enquiry on the counterfeit spare parts procured by the former management of \nthe NTC and that the enquiry was still going on. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the House will recall my informing on the extreme \nmismanagement and corrupt practices then prevailing at the NTC which has resulted in the \ndire situation in which the corporation is today, both at operational and financial levels. \nI am informed by the management of the NTC that one fifth of its fleet of buses is \nbeing kept off the roads due to breakdown and spare parts issues, although these buses are \nwithin the legal age of authorising them to be operational, that is, 21 years of age. We are \ntalking about a hundred buses. That is why in November 2023, in PQ B/1405, during my \ndays as an Opposition MP, I had questioned the then Minister of Land Transport on the \nalleged malpractices occurring at the NTC. The population will recall how the then Speaker \nhad brutally and vehemently prevented me from addressing additional questions to the then \nMinister. The reason for then suppressing facts… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Minister, the question is simple; whether there has been an \ninquiry and where matters stand. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes, I am coming to it. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Can we please stick to the question? \nMr Osman Mahomed: Yes. \nThe Deputy Speaker: We do not want to go back to the ex-Speaker … \nMr Osman Mahomed: Okay. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the General \nManager of the NTC this morning that several spare parts items have been purchased by the \nthen management at prices that range for more than three times, even going up to 25 times \nhigher than current spare parts. Nobody in the House by any stretch of imagination could ever \nbelieve that an item could be acquired 25 times more than its normal price. This is sheer \ndaylight robbery. \nAs a matter of fact, the NTC has provided me with a long list of such abusive \npurchases, which list is not exhaustive. I am tabling a list of eight items for which there are \nsupporting documents for the information of the House. The long list is still being compiled \nbut I have it with me anyway. I have also with me a list of 29 items where the NTC is still \ncompiling like I said, supporting documents and wherein it appears that some items have \nbeen acquired more than 16 times like I said. In addition, counterfeit spare parts were also \nacquired at high prices equivalent to the price of genuine spare parts or some items even \nhigher or repeatedly stated to me by hon. Jugurnauth himself in the domain, particularly on \nthe purchase of crank shafts, which example I had mentioned in the House before. I have \ntoday with me supporting documents which prove that the crank shaft has been purchased \nfour times more than its current market price, that is Rs365 each instead of Rs89,600 at \ncurrent market price. This appalling situation of mismanagement and corrupt practices \nresorted to by the former management is the reason as to why 20-25% of the fleet today is off \nthe road like I mentioned. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as per information provided by the NTC, a single supplier of \nspare parts, AB World Spare Parts Ltd has benefitted over Rs380 million of businesses \nbetween 2020 and 2024. It was the preferred supplier of the previous management under \nunderlying reasons therefore for an easy guess. Based on the extremely abusive prices paid to \nthat supplier as evidenced by documents I will table, the NTC has had to spend hundreds of \nmillions of rupees more on spare parts than purchased. This money could have certainly been \nused more judiciously to acquire scores of new buses for the benefit of the NTC and of the \ntravelling public. It is necessary to underline here that the former General Manager of the \nNTC, Mr G. R. R. has been formally charged with an offense for Public Officials using \nOffice Gratification by the FCC in December 2025, in connection with a contract of \nprocurement of bus tyres. I am tabling a copy of the communiqué issued by the FCC on 22 \nDecember 2025. \nThe communiqué also underlines that the matter has already been referred to the \nDirector of Public Prosecutions. The House will surely take note that in spite of the fact that \nthe NTC was plagued with corruption and an inquiry was initiated by the FCC against the \nformer General Manager since May 2023, that is, way before the general elections of \nNovember 2024, the previous regime maintained Mr G. R. R. in post unscathed. I wonder \nwhy so much leniency was shown and no immediate measure taken to prevent any possible \ninterference in the inquiry. I am going to finish soon. I even asked myself whether the motive \nfor no financial accounts to be filed by the NTC for some ten years prior to 2025 was not \nmeant to deliberately hide disturbing facts and figures. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that the FCC is currently enquiring into the \nsupply of counterfeit spare parts acquired during the period 2020 to 2024. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thanks. Who got a supplementary? \nMs Anquetil: I got two, please. \nThe Deputy Speaker: One by one. Let us hear the supplementary. \nMs Anquetil: Thank you. Je vous remercie, M. le président. L’honorable ministre a \névoqué une très longue liste de la CNT comportant des prix excessifs, notamment pour des \npièces de rechange prétendument contrefaites. Pourrait-il en déposer une copie de la liste \ncomplète ? Merci. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I had mentioned I will communicate \nthe communiqué and the first list and the long list that the hon. Member has requested for is \nhere with supporting documents. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, thanks. One last one. \nMs Anquetil: Last one, thank you. Merci, M. le président. Le ministre peut-il indiquer à \nla Chambre les mesures concrètes qui seront prises eut égard à ce grand préjudice causé à la \nCNT dont il porte la responsabilité en sa qualité de ministre ? Merci. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Well, like I mentioned in my substantive reply, there appears to \nbe two cases, one for which it has already been lodged at the Financial Crimes Division of the \nIntermediary Court and the second one, the enquiry is still ongoing as regards the long list \nthat I mentioned. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka! \nVALETTA BYPASS – SPEED CAMERAS – PROJECTED INSTALLATION – \nEXPECTED OPERATION DATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/433",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 433,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/433) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the projected installation of speed \ncameras along the Valetta bypass, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Traffic \nRoad Management Support Unit, information as to where matters stand, indicating the \nexpected date of coming into operation thereof. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Minister, you got the floor again!",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Yes. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, short answer. \nMr Osman Mahomed: I have ten PQs on me today, so, quite lengthy.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Try to be brief, straight to the point. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Okay. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that following a \nsite visit on 24 April 2025 at the junction of Valetta bypass B6 and the Morcellement VRS 2 \nside road, the TMRSU proceeded with the installation of fixed speed camera along Valetta \nbypass. This decision was reached in consultation with the elected Members of Constituency \nNo. 8 as well as village councillors and representatives from the Police to enhance road \nsafety. I have to mention that hon. Venkatasami has always been following on this issue, time \nand again. \nAs such, the works order for civil works for the installation of speed camera was issued \non 10 November 2025 for a value of Rs409,250.50 inclusive of VAT and the speed camera \nequipment was installed in December 2025 at the identified locus. The CEB subsequently \ncompleted the works by the installation of additional poles in February this year. I am further \ninformed that the traffic signs for the speed camera were installed on 01 April 2026 and the \nroad markings were completed on 10 April 2026. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, to reply to the specific question of the hon. Member, I am \npleased to inform the House that the speed camera is already operational since yesterday; \nMonday 20 April 2026. The speed limit for the area is 60 km/h. A communiqué has even been \nissued to that effect. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Rodrigues! \nANSE RAFFIN, RODRIGUES – UNSTABLE BOULDERS – INQUIRY REPORT – \nPREVENTION MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/434",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 434,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/434) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nNational Infrastructure whether, in regard to the incident whereby unstable boulders rolled \nonto the coastal road near Anse Raffin, in Rodrigues, on 05 April 2026, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to whether an inquiry has been initiated into the \ncauses thereof and, if so, indicate – \n(a) \nthe outcome thereof and table copy of the report thereof, if any, and  \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given for the planning of prevention measures for \nfuture works, including slope stabilisation and protective works, in close \ncollaboration with the Rodrigues Regional Assembly.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Rodrigues Regional \nAssembly that following the incident whereby unstable boulders rolled onto the coastal road \nnear Anse Raffin, in Rodrigues, on 05 April 2026, a survey was conducted by the Deputy \nChief Commissioner’s office. The findings of the survey indicate that the embankment is \nunstable over a stretch of approximately 115 metres with an average height of about 15 \nmetres. The instability has been attributed to prolonged landslide and erosion over time. \nI wish to inform the House that the geotechnical unit of my Ministry as well as the \nRoad Development Authority have not, as at date, received any formal request to investigate \nthe matter. Nevertheless, my Ministry stands committed to carrying out the necessary \ninvestigations and providing appropriate technical guidance upon request from the Rodrigues \nRegional Assembly. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the \nRodrigues Regional Assembly that remedial works are being envisaged, including slope \nstabilisation through major earthworks and the construction of a masonry retaining wall.  \nI am further apprised by the Geotechnical Unit of my Ministry that given the \ngeomorphological characteristics of the area, the risk of recurrence remains significant and \nfurther assessments would be necessary to determine appropriate long-term mitigation \nmeasures. These include – \n(i) \ndetailed geotechnical surveys to identify high-risk zones; \n(ii) \nconstruction of retaining structures where necessary; \n(iii) the installation of rockfall barriers, and \n(iv) afforestation and vegetation reinforcement along vulnerable slopes. \nThe RDA has, on its part, indicated that it will continue to collaborate with the \nRodrigues Regional Assembly, under the existing framework of cooperation. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry remains committed to working closely with the \nRodrigues Regional Assembly to ensure that appropriate measures are implemented to \nenhance the resilience and safety of road infrastructure in Rodrigues. As such, a team \ncomprising officers from the Geotechnical Unit and the RDA would proceed shortly to \nRodrigues for a survey. \nMr François: Just to extrapolate on what the hon. Minister is saying, will the survey be \ncarried out only on this specific site or will they be looking at the other susceptible landslide \nor unstable terrains around the island? \nMr Gunness: I am sure the hon. Member knows that we have a Memorandum of \nUnderstanding between the RDA and the RRA. So, if the RRA requests a survey in any \nregion, since the geotechnical team and the RDA will be going there, it will be with much \npleasure that I will ask them to carry out the survey where necessary. \nMr François: If they do not do so, can I request same? \nMr Gunness: I beg your pardon? \nMr François: If they do not request, can I request it? There are some problem sites, \nlike Grand Baie and Baladirou. Can you look into it as well? \nMr Gunness: You can send a formal request to the Ministry. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Third Member for Montagne Blanche & Grand River \nSouth East! \nVAPING DEVICES – SENSITISATION & PREVENTION MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-28-april-2026"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/435",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 435,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/435) Dr. R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the vaping devices, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the measures taken or being envisaged \nto curb the said practice, including sensitisation and prevention programmes in educational \ninstitutions to raise awareness of the health risks and legal implications associated therewith.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Mauritius initially regulated the consumption of \nvaping devices and e-cigarettes in 2008, through the Public Health (Restriction on Tobacco \nProducts) Regulations 2008, by limiting the importation of such products strictly to personal \nconsumption.  \nSubsequently, vaping has been prohibited since 2023. Under the Public Health \n(Restriction on Tobacco Products) Regulations 2022, vapes are categorised as Electronic \nNicotine Delivery System and Non-Nicotine Delivery Systems, and these are banned. The \nregulations clearly define vapes and extend prohibition to accessories used with devices, \nincluding filters and tubing. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the House may wish to note that, globally, vaping devices \nexist as both disposable and non-disposable products. However, under the current legislation \nin Mauritius, no distinction is made between these categories, and both are prohibited.  \nThe enforcement of the ban on the sale and import vapes multi-stakeholder effort, \ninvolving border control with the Customs Division of the Mauritius Revenue Authority \n(MRA) as well as local enforcement by Public Health and Food Safety Inspectorate of my \nMinistry and the Mauritius Police Force. \nI am further informed by the MRA that the number of passengers screened upon their \narrival at the airport in 2025 were 27,443, and as at 15 April 2026, a total of 7,142 passengers \nhad been screened.  \nThe methods of detection applied regarding the import of vapes include the scanning of \npassenger luggage, cargo and courier consignments as well as the physical inspection and \nexamination of such items. Additionally, intelligence and information sharing, together with \nthis profiling, are used to support detection efforts.  \nThe House may also wish to note that, as part of the enforcement efforts by the MRA, a \ntotal 4,927 vaping devices and accessories were seized and destroyed in 2025, while 1,155 \nunits have been seized and destroyed as at 15 April 2026.  \nAdditionally, at the level of my Ministry, a total of 59 squad operations were carried \nout by the Public Health and Food Safety Inspectorate in 2025, during which, 1,280 premises \nwere visited. For 2026 and as at date, seven squad operations have been conducted, and 52 \npremises were visited. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, my Ministry, through its Health Information, \nEducation and Communication Unit, is actively implementing awareness and sensitisation \ncampaigns in educational institutions on the harmful effect of tobacco use, including vaping. \nThe programmes aim to educate students on both the health risk and the legal implications \nassociated with tobacco products and vaping.  \nSensitisation activities include – \n• \nschool-based awareness sessions and talks; \n• \ncollaboration with the Ministry of Education and Human Resource and other \nstakeholders, and \n• \ndevelopment of informational materials, including a pamphlet on vaping, \ncurrently under preparation by the Tobacco Control Unit. \nFrom January 2025 to date, a total of 662 awareness sessions has been conducted on the \nill effects smoking and vaping, reaching an estimated 7,556 students across primary schools, \nsecondary schools and Mauritius Institute of Training and Development institutions.  \nIn addition, my Ministry, in collaboration with the Attorney General’s Office, the \nWorld Health Organisation and local NGOs, has been conducting regular training sessions on \ntobacco regulations since 2023 to strengthen enforcement capacity.  \nI am also informed that mass media campaigns were conducted in 2024 with the \nemphasis on tobacco regulation and the ban on vaping. In 2025, six Health Information, \nEducation and Communication Officers were trained on tobacco-related issues, including \nvaping. Additionally, vaping was addressed as part of tobacco cessation efforts and six radio \nand television programmes in 2025. \nI would like to inform the House that for 2026, my Ministry will be holding a campaign \nfocusing on the harmful effects on tobacco use with particular emphasis on illicit vaping and \ncapacity building workshops.  \nA training workshop in collaboration with the Ministry of Education and Human \nResource will be held to further raise awareness on the consequences of tobacco and nicotine \nconsumption with a specific focus on vaping. New sensitisation materials are currently being \ndeveloped to address vaping among students and the general population.  \nMy Ministry is also collaborating, through a standing committee, with the Ministry of \nEducation and Human Resource to revise the School Management Manual (2009) so as to \nincorporate vaping as a key component of tobacco control policies in schools. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart! \nPAEDIATRIC WARDS – PARENT’S PRESENCE POLICY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/436",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 436,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/436) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to children admitted in paediatric \nwards of public hospitals, he will state the policy regarding the presence of the parents at the \nbedside thereof, indicating whether his Ministry is in presence of complaints to the effect that \nfathers are not allowed thereat and, if so, indicate the remedial actions taken in relation \nthereto, if any and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that the policy of the \nMinistry of Health and Wellness is founded on the principles of family-centred and child-\nfriendly care, which recognises the presence of parents or guardians contributes positively to \nemotional comfort, reassurance and recovery of hospitalised children. I am also informed that \nall children below the age of 16 years are admitted and managed by paediatric units. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as a general rule, one parent or authorised guardian is allowed \nto remain with the child at the bedside, subject to prevailing ward regulations infection, \nprevention and control measures, security requirements, the medical condition of the patient, \nand the need to preserve privacy, safety and comfort of other patients in the ward.  \nPaediatric wards are predominantly staffed by female healthcare personnel, who \nfacilitate a supportive and appropriate environment for the care of admitted children. In line \nwith the current practice, mothers are encouraged to stay with their hospitalised children in \nthose wards to allow mothers to breastfeed their babies, thereby promoting child’s welfare. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in the current health system, general wards are considered as \ncommon wards with common toilets and showers for all patients. As such, public hospitals do \nnot have private wards with attached toilets and bathroom. In some wards, dedicated seating \narrangement are available for only one accompanying parent, whilst in others, space \nlimitations, ward configuration or ongoing clinical activity may require adjustment.  \nI am informed that allowing the presence of parents, including fathers or guardians, are \naddressed on a case-to-case basis by the Ward Manager, Nursing Administrator and hospital \nmanagement, taking into consideration the best interests of the child, medical advice, ward \ncircumstances and any special considerations. As such, appropriate flexibility is exercised \nwhenever circumstances permit.  \nI am further informed that a complaint was received by the Acting Regional Health \nDirector of Flacq Hospital regarding the stay of a father with a son aged 14 months on 12 \nApril 2026. Given that no side wards were available at the Hospital, necessary arrangements \nwere made to provide a suitable space to accommodate both father and his son in Cardiac \nWard. However, the father refused the proposal and absconded from the hospital with the \nchild. A precautionary measure was lodged at the Police Force by the Duty Manager on call \nand the Child Development Unit was informed accordingly. I wish to point out that in this \nparticular case, as already mentioned above, only female nurses are looking after children. \nIn addition, there were mothers who are breastfeeding their children and, in these \ncircumstances, it wasn’t appropriate to allow the father to stay in the ward. Necessary \narrangements were therefore made for the father to stay in another ward. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes! \nDr. Prayag: Would the hon. Minister confirm that this policy that they have is not apt \nfor single fathers and maybe, he will also confirm whether this same father had sued the \nprevious government, Ministry of Health in the past, and got money for that? \nMr Bachoo: I am not aware what the father did earlier. But one thing is clear, how can \nI allow, how can the government or the Ministry allow that the fathers to be in wards where \nmothers are breastfeeding their children, this is illogical. It cannot be accepted and nobody \nwill accept and all the Superintendents of all the hospitals are unanimous on this issue. We \nhave given the father the chance of staying in the cardiac ward. We offered him, he refused \nand then he absconded, he took the child and ran away. So, in such a case, he is an \nirresponsible parent and I don’t have anything more to say on that. \nDr. Prayag: Would the hon. Minister agree that there are side wards in paediatric \nwards, side rooms for such cases and also in that case, if we follow this logic then male \ndoctors should not be working in paediatric wards? \nMr Bachoo: I am sorry, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. I would request the hon. Member to \nvisit Flacq Hospital. There are no side wards there. In that hospital, provisions are made. \nHow can I allow a male to be with children, small kids where the mothers are breastfeeding \ntheir children. This is impossible, unacceptable, immoral and unethical. It can never be \naccepted. \nThe Deputy Speaker: You have made your point hon. Minister. The hon. Third \nMember for Quartier Militaire & Moka! \nBEAU BOIS – CUT-OFF DRAIN PROJECT – PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/437",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 437,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/437) Mr P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the proposed \nimplementation of a cut-off drain project at Beau Bois, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Land Drainage Authority, information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Land Drainage Authority \nthat the region of Beau Bois was very severely impacted following several past flooding \nevents. The primary cause of flooding in the area has been attributed to construction activities \ncarried out along natural drainage paths without adequate consideration for storm water \nevacuation. Consequently, surface run-off originating from the upstream sugarcane fields \nflows towards the residential areas adversely affecting the region. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed that a preliminary topographical survey \nof the region has been conducted by the LDA and the following proposed mitigation \nmeasures have been earmarked – \n1. \nCut-off drains upstream of the residential area, the construction of a cut-off  swale \ndrain is being proposed upstream of the residential area to prevent storm water \nfrom channelling into the residential area. The collected run-off will then be \ndirected to a safe discharge point at the Rivulet Cresson, located some 100 metres \nfrom the B49 Road. \n2. \nRipailles – La Nicolière Road B49, upgrading of the existing road side drains to \nensure adequate hydraulic capacity and fitted with metal grating where necessary \nfor proper ingress of surface run-off. Upgrading of the culvert crossing the \nRipailles – La Nicolière Road B49, next to Beau Bois Football Ground. \nReprofiling the road surface to direct maximum surface run-off to propose \nupgrading of road side drains and cross drains. Clean existing drain along the \nRipailles – La Nicolière Road B49, where warranted to ensure proper \nfunctioning. \n3. \nLateral roads, Seeburuth Lane, Mungra Lane and Chady Lane. Construction of \nroad side drains along the lateral roads with full metal grating modules and \nrequired cross drains based on site conditions, directing storm water to a safe and \nproper discharge point. Reprofile the road surface to direct maximum surface run-\noff to the newly proposed side drains and cross drains. \n4. \nImmediate measures undertaken by RDA, regular cleaning of existing drains \nalong B49. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed that the project is still at the inception \nstage at the level of the Land Drainage Authority and once approved by its board, the project \nwill be implemented by the designated agency, that is, either the NDU, the RDA or the DICL. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes! \nMr Venkatasami: Will the hon. Minister consider to earmark fund in the next coming \nbudget for this project? \nMr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as I said, we are at the inception stage, \nobviously, once the design and everything will be ready, we will go for financial clearance. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River \nSouth East! \nNATIONAL LAND TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – BUS ROUTE 16D – DELAYS \n– REASONS & MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/438",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 438,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/438) Dr. R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the implementation of Bus Route \n16D, namely, Rose Hill via Belle Rose, Clémencia and Camp de Masque Pavé to be operated \nby buses operating along Route 16, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nNational Land Transport Authority, information as to the reasons for the delay thereof, \nindicating the – \n(a)  timeframe set therefor and  \n(b)  immediate measures being envisaged to address the difficulties being faced by \ncommuters in the said regions.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the NLTA that three \nbuses owned by individual operators are licensed to provide bus services along route 16D \n(Rose Hill, Place Margéot – Central Flacq via Bel Air, Cité La Lucie, Belle Rose, Clémencia \nand Camp de Masque Pavé). However, only one bus is effectively providing service on this \nroute. This bus operates a single trip daily, departing from Central Flacq Bus Station at \napproximately 5.45 hours in the morning towards Rose Hill via Bel Air and Clementia. The \nthree buses hold a dual licence also authorising them to operate along Road 15, that is, Rose \nHill to Flacq via Quartier Militaire, which is a more lucrative road. Therefore, they focus on \ntheir operation on that route instead of 16D. \nI am made to understand that the limited level of service along route 16D is mainly \nattributable to a very low passenger demand along the route including in localities as such \nPetite Cabane, Clémencia and Belle Rose, during the day. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, following representations from the hon. Member and a letter \ndated 24 March 2026 from a representative of the Moka-Flacq Bus Owners Cooperative \nSociety Ltd, operators serving along Route 16 and 16A, have expressed their willingness to \noperate along route 16D, which is part of your substantive question, on a daily roster basis. \nIn this context a meeting is being scheduled at the level of the NLTA with operators of \nBus Routes 15 and 16, tentatively, on 23 April 2026, that is, day after tomorrow, to examine \nthe proposal with a view to improving the frequency of operation and reliability of services \nalong Route 16D. The timeframe for implementation will be determined following \nconsultations with all stakeholders concerned. The NLTA will, however, take prompt \nremedial measures to ensure an adequate service along Route 16D. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is also to be noted that alternative public transport is \navailable along Route 113A, that is, Port Louis, Victoria Square – Bel Air, which serves \nCamp de Masque Pavé, Belle Rose, Clémencia and Petite Cabane. Some shortcomings have \nalso been reported on services along this route as well as these are being looked into and they \nare being looked into by the NLTA. Again the paucity of number of passengers in these \nlocalities being the main reason for the reluctance of bus operators to provide the required \nservices. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the NLTA under the direction of my Ministry has intensified \nenforcement and crackdown operations across key regions to address irregularities in bus \noperations. Sustained monitoring with unannounced inspection are being effected on a \nregular basis with a particular focus on non-compliance such as route breaking and failure to \noperate scheduled services. Where breeches are committed, the NLTA is establishing \ncontraventions and in case of recurrence, disciplinary actions against the license holders will \nbe initiated. These on-going crackdown operations would be further intensified to ensure \nstrict compliance, restore discipline among operators and safeguard the reliability of public \ntransport services for commuters. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to also inform the House that the forthcoming Fleet \nManagement System for which tenders are currently being evaluated will be a game changer \nin bringing efficiency in our bus public service.  \nIn addition, my Ministry is working on the Bus Services Bill which will regulate the \nservices standards and operations of buses.  \nTo end, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I also wish to reassure the hon. Member that in this \ncontext, due attention will be given to the services along Road 16 D. With the arrangements \nbeing made by the NLTA, the service will hopefully meet community needs. \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member.  \nDr. Saumtally: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. I want to bring to the attention of \nthe hon. Minister of Land Transport that Route 16D namely, Rose-Hill via Belle-Rose, \nClemencia and Camp de Masque Pavé, already exists on NLTA website, and is operated by \nbuses of Route 16 D. Can the hon. Minister look into it, please? \nMr Osman Mahomed: I won’t be surprised that it is so. Like I said earlier, there is low \npassenger demand for that particular route because there are almost no travellers but in the \nmeeting that is going to happen day after tomorrow, I will ask the chairperson to particularly \nlook at this issue.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle. \nNOUVELLE FRANCE – WATER PUMP FAILURES – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/439",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 439,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/439) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the water pump \nfailures at Nouvelle France over the past few months, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to the short-term and long-term \nmeasures being envisaged, respectively to restore stable and continuous water supply thereat, \ngiving details thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: M. le président, la CWA m’informe que le nouveau réservoir de \nservice de Nouvelle France a une capacité de stockage de 2500 m³. Elle fournit de l'eau à \n3530 abonnés dans les régions de Nouvelle France, Grand Port Road, partie basse d'Union \nPark et de Savanne Road. Ces régions bénéficient d'une alimentation en eau intermittente. \nL’eau provient de deux forages à Nouvelle France et du réservoir de 16ème Mille. \n La CWA a annoncé avoir pris plusieurs mesures pour améliorer l'approvisionnement \nen eau. Ainsi, afin de remédier rapidement aux pannes fréquentes de pompes survenues ces \nderniers mois, la CWA a remplacé la pompe défectueuse. De plus, pendant les périodes de \ncoupure, à titre de mesure palliative et jusqu'à ce que l'approvisionnement en eau soit rétabli, \nla CWA fournit des camions-citernes aux consommateurs des régions de Nouvelle-France et \nd'Union Park selon les besoins. \nM. le président, j'ai également appris que la CWA envisageait le forage de puits \nsupplémentaires dans la région, qui seraient équipés de pompes de secours afin de maintenir \nun approvisionnement constant en eau en cas de panne d'une pompe sur ces sites. \nÀ moyen terme, M. le président, la CWA procédera au renouvellement de la conduite \nprincipale sur une longueur approximative de 1,2 km, entre le commissariat de police de \nNouvelle-France et le rond-point de Nouvelle-France, dans le cadre du programme de \nremplacement des tuyaux financés par la ligne de crédit indienne. Ce renouvellement \npermettra d'accroître l'efficacité du réseau parce qu’il y a beaucoup de pertes bien sûr, de \ndistribution et le volume d'eau alimentant le réservoir. Ce projet devrait être achevé d'ici deux \nans. \n En outre, la possibilité de forer un nouveau puits en amont du réservoir de Nouvelle \nFrance est envisagée afin de compléter ledit réservoir. Ce n’est rien de définitif ce nouveau \nforage.  \n À terme, une fois la station d'épuration de La Marie modernisée, la CWA prévoit \nd'accroître les prélèvements d'eau du réservoir du 16ème Mille, alimenté par celui de La \nBrasserie. Ceci devrait améliorer l'approvisionnement en eau de la région Nouvelle-France. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes.  \nMr Seeburn: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, can the hon. Minister inform the House as to \nhow effective and reliable the short-term measures would be, being given that the inhabitants \nof Nouvelle France have been deprived of water shortages on a regular basis? \nMr Assirvaden: Je voudrai dire a l’honorable membre que les pannes que nous avons \neues, M. le président, nous avons eu trois pannes dans cette région de Nouvelle France. Il y a \neu le 10 février, le 12 février, le 26 février. Donc, deux pannes que nous avons eues sont les \nproblèmes d’électricité du CEB qui est arrivé le 10 et le 12, et le 26 février c’était en raison \nde fluctuation. \nVous savez dans les pompes que nous mettons soit sur le réseau soit dans les réservoirs \n– donc sur le réseau, les pompes sont abimées un peu plus rapidement. Donc, ce que nous \navons fait, comme je l’ai dit dans ma réponse initiale, c’est que nous allons mettre deux \npompes de secours à côté des pompes existants afin de maintenir en approvisionnement \nconstant. Donc, bien souvent quand une pompe tombe en panne, cela prend du temps a la \nCWA pour intervenir. Donc, cela prend beaucoup temps et après avoir retirer l’eau, le réseau \nse retrouve à sec. Il faudra enlever l’air. Donc, cela prend beaucoup de temps, le flushing \ncomme on dit dans le jargon. Donc, ce que nous faisons dans cette région c’est que nous \nmettons une pompe de secours pour que l’eau soit un peu plus constante.  \nMr Seeburn: Being given that the long-term solution will take two years for \nimplementation and the fact the hon. Minister has stated that for the short-term measures, \nthere will be two additional new pumps that will be fixed so as to resolve the issue, do we \nknow the time-frame for those two new pumps that will be fixed? \nMr Assirvaden: Ce sera fait assez vite parce qu’il n’y a pas que dans le long terme \nmais en moyen terme, nous pensons aussi faire des forages. La possibilité de forer des \nnouveaux puits en amont et aussi nous avons acheté, nous avons passé une commande pour \n15 CPF au cout de R 320 millions. Les containerised plant filters que nous allons mettre dans \nles rivières tout autour de Nouvelle France pour améliorer la distribution. Mais il y a dans \nl’immédiat, les pompes, dans les moyen termes, les forages et dans le long terme le \nchangement de tuyaux et aussi d’autres projets.   \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Members, the Table has been advised that the following \nPQs have been withdrawn: B/441, B/450, B/458, B/473, B/485, B/489, B/491, and B/492.  \nThe next question is the hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues. Hon. Edouard. \nRODRIGUES – ELECTRIC VEHICLES – ENERGY CONSUMPTION & \nRENEWABLE ENERGY USAGE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/440",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 440,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/440) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nEnergy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to electric vehicles, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Central Electricity Board, information as to – \n(a) \nthe estimated average daily energy consumption thereof in mainland Mauritius \nand Rodrigues Island, respectively, and  \n(b)  whether renewable energy is being used for the charging thereof and, if not, the \nmeasures being envisaged in relation thereto, indicating the timeframe set \ntherefor.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: M. le président, en ce qui concerne la partie (a) de la question, je suis \ninformé par le Central Electricity Board (CEB) que la consommation énergétique quotidienne \nmoyenne estimée des véhicules électriques sur l'île Maurice pour le mois de mars 2026 \ns'élève à 21 723 kWh pour un total de 2 260 clients. \nEn ce qui concerne l'île Rodrigues, je suis également informé que l'infrastructure de \nrecharge pour les véhicules électriques a été mise en service récemment, le 30 mars 2026, et \nque la consommation énergétique quotidienne moyenne correspondante pour le mois de mars \n2026 est estimée à 3,5 kWh pour un client. On a seulement un client enregistré au CEB pour \nRodrigues. \nM. le président, le CEB gère actuellement trois programmes visant à promouvoir \nl'utilisation des énergies renouvelables pour la recharge des véhicules électriques, à savoir – \n(a)  le programme CEB Solar PV pour la recharge des véhicules électriques et vous \nbénéficiez en même temps d’um time of use. Donc si vous utilisez l’électricité \npour charge votre voiture à une heure tardive, un peu après 9hr du soir, donc vous \navez un tarif plus bas ;  \nb) \nle programme CEB pour la recharge des véhicules électriques des entreprises ; \ndonc les entreprises aussi ont ce programme qui permettent à leurs employés de \ncharge leurs véhicules, \n(c)  Nous avons le programme CEB pour les fournisseurs de services, les compagnies \ndes voitures, offrant un service public de recharge de véhicules électriques. \nLes objectifs des programmes d'énergies renouvelables mentionnés ci-dessus pour la \nrecharge des véhicules électriques sont principalement pour réduire les émissions de CO2 \ndans le secteur des transports et de poursuivre la décarbonation du réseau électrique national. \nDans le cadre de ces dispositifs, les propriétaires de véhicules électriques sont autorisés \nà installer, depuis quelque temps, je l’ai annoncé il y a deux semaines de cela, les systèmes \nphotovoltaïques PV d'une puissance maximale de 10 kW sur leurs toits, leur parking, leurs \nmaisons, leur cours, comme ils veulent et ensuite injecter le surplus d'électricité dans le \nréseau. Donc celui ou celle qui veux installer pas plus que 10kW sur sa maison, sur son \nparking ou sur un terrain quelque part, donc ils ont qu’à informer le CEB, non pas demander \nla permission au CEB. Informer le CEB et vous faites l’installation.  \nPar ailleurs, un tarif heures pleines/heures creuses, ce qu’on appelle le tarif 150C a été \nmis en place afin d'encourager la recharge des véhicules électriques pendant les heures \ncreuses, soit entre 21h00 et 4h le lendemain, donc quand la demande est moyenne.  \nM. le président, en ce qui concerne la partie (b) de la question, je suis informé par le \nCEB que 93 raccordements ont été effectués dans le cas de trois schémas comme je l’ai \nexpliqué pour une capacité installée de 2768 kilowatts. Cependant, dans le cas de ces \nprogrammes, l’installation des systèmes photovoltaïques pour recharger les véhicules \nélectriques est facultative. \nMon ministère, M. le président, modifiera prochainement ses programmes afin de \nrendre obligatoire l’alimentation de tous les véhicules électriques par l’énergie renouvelable. \nC’est un peu un faux débat. Vous avez une voiture électrique, vous parlez d’énergie \nrenouvelable, mais quand vous prenez votre charge, on brûle du charbon ; on brûle de l’huile \nlourde. C’est un peu un faux débat.  \nC’est pour cette raison que nous avons l’intention, au sein du ministère, de modifier la \nloi pour que celles ou ceux qui achètent une voiture électrique ou qui possèdent déjà une \nvoiture électrique sont obligés, dans un moratoire de quelque temps, de mettre des panneaux \nphotovoltaïques pour charge leur véhicule. \nIl convient de souligner, M. le président, que la CEB a récemment lancé le projet \nvoltaïque solaire permettant en particulier, comme je viens de le dire, d’installer 10 kilowatts \nde système voltaïque avec un système de stockage de batterie. Ces programmes devraient \nrelancer l’adoption d’énergie renouvelable dans toute la république. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue! \nMINISTRY OF PUBLIC SERVICE & ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS – \nVACANCIES & RECRUITMENT MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/441",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 441,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms",
      "question": "(No. B/441) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) asked \nthe Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms whether, in regard to the vacant \nposts within his Ministry, he will state the number thereof grade-wise, indicating when same \nwill be filled.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nEX-CHA/EDC HOUSES – ASBESTOS ISSUES – INTER-MINISTERIAL \nCOMMITTEE WORK PLAN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/442",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 442,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/442) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the Inter-ministerial \nCommittee set up to look into all issues pertaining to Ex-CHA/EDC houses containing \nasbestos, he will state if the said committee has started meeting and, if so, indicate the work \nplan thereof. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Minister of Housing and Lands!",
      "answer": "Mr Mohamed: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. At its meeting of Friday 10 April \n2026, Cabinet agreed to the setting up of an Inter-Ministerial Committee to look into all \nissues pertaining to Ex-CHA/EDC houses containing asbestos. \nThe committee would be chaired by me and would comprise my colleagues the hon. \nMinister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change, the hon. Minister of \nNational Infrastructure, the hon. Minister of Health and Wellness and the hon. Minister of \nLocal Government. \nUnfortunately, the Inter-Ministerial Committee has not yet met. It has just gone through \nthe Cabinet of last week, waited for confirmation, and that is the process. I am informed that \nin the meantime, Statistics Mauritius is carrying out a survey to determine inter alia the \npresent number of Ex-CHA houses containing asbestos, the state of the buildings and profile \nof the house owners or occupiers. The preliminary findings are expected before the end of \nMay 2026. The survey will provide updated and additional data for proper recommendations \nto be made to Government.  \nSo, as the hon. Member would agree, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this survey being carried \nout is of utmost importance in order to be able to make an informed decision. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes! \nMs Savabaddy: Merci, M. le président. Merci au ministre pour sa réponse. Est-ce que \nle nouveau comité mis en place et qui sera désormais présidé par le ministère des Terres et du \nLogement, par le ministère de l’Environnement, entre autres, prendra en considération le \ntravail déjà commencé par le comité qui a été présidé par l’ex Junior Minister ? D’ailleurs, \nc’est le ministre même qui me l’avait. Qu’en sera-t-il des recommandations déjà faites ? \nMerci. \nMr Mohamed: Well, as I have already explained, all such recommendations will also \nbe taken into account when we are to make our report and recommendations. However, what \nis of utmost importance, as I am just repeating that part, is that we need to be able to have a \nproper survey to determine the exact state of affairs of this whole situation.  \nWithout that survey, we will be just as though we are shooting in the dark. I do not want \nto be put in a situation or put Government in a situation where I am just coming up with \ntheory. I want to be very practical in the approach. This is precisely what the committee \nwants to do. So, this survey will be of help in order for us to be able to assess the situation. \nNow, the last survey that was carried out was back in November 2022. There were still \naround 1,560 out of 3,113 EDC houses. So, this survey has to be updated, and there are \nadditional data that we need in order to be able to make a decision. But as I have said, the \nsurvey is going to be ready by next month. So, that is a good thing for us to proceed. \nMs Savabaddy: Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, do you have a question? \nMs J. Bérenger: Merci. Une des principales préoccupations pour les habitants des \nmaisons en amiante, c’est d’avoir une alternative, un endroit où ils peuvent habiter quand \nleurs maisons seront détruites.  \nÉtant donné que l’honorable ministre est ministre des Terres et du Logement et \nresponsable de la NHDC, peut-il nous confirmer si le nouveau comité interministériel prendra \nen considération la recommandation selon laquelle la priorité doit être donnée aux habitants \ndes maisons en amiante pour des maisons NHDC ? \nMr Mohamed: I have gone through the questions that were asked in this Assembly \nsome time back. If I am not mistaken, the former, former Deputy Prime Minister had \nanswered a question to the very same hon. Member, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. The question is, \nas it stands, all NHDC and NSLD houses are for those who do not own property. So, to be \nable to change that policy – because I guess this is what the hon. Member has been trying to \nget at for many years now – is to give priority to those that have the EDC houses and to give \nthem NSLD houses. \nSo, the answer that was given then was no. This is one of very few areas where I agree \nwith the former Minister of Housing. The answer is no. \nWe will not be able to put them in a situation where we give priority to those who own \nhouses. The issue is that they have to have houses reconstructed. While I agree that those \nhouses that need to be reconstructed, there is a cost to it. But we will get to the bridge and \ncross it when we get there. \nBut as it stands right now, I am not ready to take a policy decision of giving priority to \npeople who already own a house and to give them priority over those who do not own a \nhouse and have been waiting for many, many years. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, one question. It is your question.  \nMs Savabaddy: J’ai encore une question. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes! You have the floor. \nMs Savabaddy: Thank you. Est-ce que le ministre des Terres et du Logement peut \nconfirmer à la Chambre et aussi aux habitants dont les maisons sont amiantées, est-ce qu’ils \nauront une subvention provenant de l’État ? Merci. \nMr Mohamed: You see, if I were to give you an answer with regard to that today, what \nwould therefore be the point of having the Inter-Ministerial Committee? The whole point of \nthe Inter-Ministerial Committee is to take stock of the survey being carried out, as I have \nsaid, take into consideration all reports and works that have been done by all parties, and then \nmake recommendations to Cabinet. It is only then that I will be in a position to come up with \na formula as to what the solution would be. \nSo, right now, it would be really premature for me to go as far as pronouncing myself \non that issue. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, one last question. \nMs J. Bérenger: En réalité, le grant actuel est de R 130,000, ce qui n’est absolument \npas suffisant pour pouvoir reconstruire une maison. Les matériaux de construction coûtent \nbeaucoup plus cher. Le ministre m’a donné la même réponse que l’ancien ministre, mais le \nministre reconnait-il que l’État a une responsabilité pour donner une alternative à ces \nhabitants, pour leur donner une nouvelle maison ?  Puisque, dans le passé, ce sont des \nmaisons toxiques qui leur ont été données par l’État. \nDonc, aujourd’hui, reconnait-il la responsabilité de l’État dans cette démarche de leur \ndonner une alternative ? \nMr Mohamed: Once again, when I was put in the presence of the issue of asbestos \nhouses, I made it a point of reading all reports that exist: the expert reports that have \npronounced themselves on the toxicity or the non-toxic element of those houses.  \nI see that politicians for many years now have been pronouncing themselves as though \nit is a fact that those are toxic houses. But I am in possession of other reports that basically do \nnot confirm that. So, I want to proceed with prudence and not with an alarming attitude where \nI get people to start getting scared, and simply promise them money when, in fact, there was \nno need for it. So, let us proceed in a very dispassionate manner, even though it is a very \nimportant issue.  \nLet us analyse the experts’ reports. What is the status? Is it toxic, or is it not? If it is, it \nwill be put before Cabinet with the report. Then, Cabinet will decide what the situation is. \nBut what I am not ready to do is to say today that Government gave houses that were toxic to \npeople. That I am prepared to say is not true. \n  The Deputy Speaker: Okay. Next question! Hon. Third Member for Port Louis North \n& Montagne Longue! \nSKIPPER'S LICENCE – ISSUE, RENEWAL & REJECTION – PROFILE \nASSESSMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/443",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 443,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. B/443) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Tourism whether, in regard to the Skipper's licence, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Tourism Authority, information as to – \n(a) \nthe number thereof, category-wise – \n(i) \nissued; \n(ii) \nrenewed, and \n(iii) applications therefor rejected, over the past five years, and \n(b) \nwhether a profiling assessment is conducted prior to the issue thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nROAD TRAFFIC ACT & REGULATIONS – FINES – DIGITAL PAYMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/444",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 444,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/444) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the payment of fines \nunder the Road Traffic Act and Regulations, he will state where matters stand as to the \nprovision of facilities for payment thereof through internet banking and mobile applications.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, at the outset I wish to inform the \nHouse Road Traffic Act was amended in September 2019 through the Road Traffic \n(Amendment No. 3), Act No. 24 of 2019 with a view to facilitating the electronic payment of \nfixed penalty notices. It was also announced in the Budget Speech 2022/2023 of the then hon. \nMinister of Finance that the payment of road traffic fines would be offered online. However, \nthe Road Traffic (Amendment No. 3) of 2019 was not proclaimed as enhancement of both IT \nsystem of the Police Department and the Master and Registrar of the Supreme Court was in \nprogress. \nIn fact, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in his report for the financial year 2024/2025, the \nDirector of Audit has observed that the revenue from fixed penalty notices served by the \npolice officers were collected at District Courts and credited as fines under the control of the \nJudiciary instead of a revenue item for the Mauritius Police Force. Therefore, the Director of \nAudit recommended to digitalise the whole process of raising fines and payment of same. \nThe reform is expected to enhance efficiency, transparency and proper revenue tracking. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regard of the main question, I have been informed that in \nFebruary this year by the Master and Registrar of the Supreme Court that the system for \nonline payment of fixed penalty notices on the Supreme Court portal is technically ready to \naccept online payment of fixed penalty notices through mobile banking apps, Internet \nbanking facilities, debit and credit cards or MauCAS account transfers. \nThe Police Department has also informed that their IT system is ready. They are \nproposing in parallel to look into the possibility to use the beSafeMoris mobile app for \npayment of fixed penalty notices – hon. Dr. Ramtohul is aware of what I am saying. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed by the Commissioner of Police that the \namendments brought to the Road Traffic Act of 2019 are not fully aligned with those \nintroduced by the Road Traffic (Amendment) Act of 2025 in January this year in relation to \nthe reintroduction of the Penalty Point System. \nTherefore, Commissioner of Police has recommended that a new piece of legislation be \nenacted to make provision for online payment of fixed penalty notices in line with the Road \nTraffic (Amendment) Act of 2025. My Ministry has initiated consultations with the hon. \nAttorney General’s Office in that respect. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes. Do you have a question? \nMr A. Duval: I have a question. I wanted to ask the hon. Minister, whether he would \nconsider amending the law to allow for the payment of fixed penalty beyond the 28 days limit \nas it is now, impossible after 28 days which means that you have to go to Court and that only \nburdens the Court with even more work, when it could be and that is the question, whether \nthe hon. Minister would consider allowing for payment after even with a penalty system \nimposed for a higher amount to be paid so long as you get to do it before it is fixed on cause \nlist of the Court, it would be, I think, in the interest of your Ministry and justice itself? \nMr Osman Mahomed:  As the law stands, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, if the 28 days \nperiod are exceeded, the fines and the points are both doubled – as per the amendment \nbrought in December last year. \nSo, there will have to be amendment to the Road Traffic Act once again for that to \noccur. \nMr A. Duval: If I may, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir? \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, yes. \nMr A. Duval: I understand but the issue is once you fail to pay within the 28 days, you \nhave to go to Court. You have to wait for the notice to be issued to you, the summons after \nmonths, sometimes years and you cannot pay even though, for whatever reasons you may \nhave neglected to pay within the 28 days. So, as far as the payment is concerned, whether he \nproposes now, especially for those offences which do not fall under the Penalty Point System, \nwhether he proposes to bring amendments, so to allowed that we can pay at any time even if \nthere is the introduction of a penalty as I said so long as you can do it. \nMr Osman Mahomed: We will look into it. \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Thank you. \nHon. Members with the Table has been advised that the following PQs have been \nwithdrawn: B/446, B/449, B/454, B/455, B/456, B/460, B/464, B/465, B/468, B/469, B/472, \nB/475, B/476, B477, B/478, B/480, B/481, B/482, B/483 B/484, and B/486. \nTime is over! \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I beg to move that all the business on \ntoday’s Order Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10. \nMr Mohamed rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nPUBLIC BILLS \nFirst Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Electronic Transactions (Amendment) Bill (No. V of \n2026) was read a first time. \nAt this stage, Madam Speaker took the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated. \nYes, hon. Attorney General! \nSecond Reading \nTHE CERTIFICATE OF CHARACTER BILL \n(No. II of 2026) \nOrder for Second Reading read.  \n(4.23 p.m.) \nThe Attorney General (Mr G. P. C. Glover, SC): Madam Speaker, I beg to move that \nthe Certificate of Character Bill (No. II of 2026) be read a second time. \nLet me start by saying this, Madam Speaker, I make no apology for what will be a \nlengthier than usual intervention in support of this Bill. The Certificate of Character Bill is \nyet another piece of the puzzle we are building for the benefit of the people. \nOne may wonder, what this Bill has to do with the rule of law or access to justice for \nthat matter.  But then it would be missing the point which is that this Bill in fact a liberating \npiece of legislation. It is a necessary step to promote social reintegration for persons who \nhave had a brush with the law and who continued to carry the stigma of a criminal conviction, \nwhich always weighs heavily on the convicted person whether with regard to his entrenched \nright to work, his right to free movement and of course one must never forget the indirect \neffect on his family. \nBefore turning to the details of this Bill, it is useful to begin with two simple benign \nquestions. First, what is a Certificate of Character, and second, why does it matter. \nA Certificate of Character or a certificat de caractère is an official document issued by \nthe Director of Public Prosecutions certifying whether a person has a criminal record. It is \nstill often referred to as certificat de moralité or even in common parlance, we hear that a \nperson pe attan gagn so moralité – he or she is waiting for that valuable document, although \na literal translation from the kreol might lead to another concept altogether.  \nThis Certificate, by whatever name called, is nowadays almost always required for \nemployment, for further studies, for visa and immigration procedures and for a range of other \nofficial purposes. For many people therefore, it is not an abstract legal document; it is the \npaper that stands between them and a job, a seat at university, the possibility of travelling \nabroad or the possibility of a new start in their lives. That is why this Bill matters and why it \nhas been eagerly awaited.  \nMadam Speaker, prior to 2006, there was no legislative framework governing so called \nCertificates of Character. These were issued under an administrative practice which had \ndeveloped over time. In 2006, the Certificate of Morality Act provided, for the first time, a \nbasic statutory framework. That Act introduced, subject to certain exceptions, a cutoff period \nof ten years in relation to crimes and misdemeanours. It also provided that a person who had \nbeen granted a free pardon under section 75 of the Constitution would be deemed never to \nhave been convicted of the relevant offence, but the Act, for example, made no provision for \nthe Director of Public Prosecutions to delegate his powers. \nIn 2012, the Certificate of Character Act repealed the earlier law and introduced a \nnumber of changes. The title was changed from ‘Certificate of Morality’ to ‘Certificate of \nCharacter’ and rightly so, because the law should not pretend that it is the universal judge of \nmorality. The law deals in legal consequences and it should do so with clarity and restraint. \nThe 2012 Act reduced the cutoff period applicable for certain less serious offenses from \n10 to five years. It allowed the Director of Public Prosecutions to delegate his powers to the \nCommissioner of Police or another officer. It extended the categories of persons who are \ndeemed never to have been convicted. It also introduced a three-month limitation period for \nrepeat applications subject to certain conditions in order to reduce unnecessary administrative \nburden. Those changes were essential and useful then but with hindsight, they did not go far \nenough. \nMadam Speaker, the present law, the 2012 legislation has remained in important \nrespect, unduly harsh. It has caused real hardship to people convicted of less serious offenses \nbecause convictions would continue to appear on their certificates in circumstances where \nthat disclosure serves little public good but causes lasting private damage. People have been \ndenied jobs. People have been denied access to university. People who had paid their debt to \nsociety have found that society was still presenting them with a bill. That is not good policy. \nIt is not very wise and, in many cases, it is just not just. A criminal sentence, Madam Speaker, \nis imposed by a court according to law but once that sentence has been served, the \npunishment has been meted out. A second social punishment is not helpful. Justice is not \nserved if a minor mistake becomes a lifelong civil disability in practice.  \nMadam Speaker, the rule of law is not only about sanctions. It is also about proportion, \nfairness, and the conditions of reintegration. A society is made safer, not more dangerous \nwhen people who have offended and who have done what the law required of them to pay \ntheir dues are given a fair opportunity to work, to study, to support a family and to live as \ncitizens rather than permanent suspects. I put the question fair and square, Madam Speaker, \nhow shall we prevent reoffending if we tell someone that there is no path for him to lead a \nreformed life?  \nRehabilitation, Madam Speaker, is not softness. It is social intelligence; it is also basic \njustice. This is why the hon. Prime Minister promised, earlier in our mandate, that the current \nlaw would be changed and we are today honouring that promise. This Bill therefore repeals \nthe existing 2012 Act and replaces it with a more just, more coherent and more humane \nframework. Its object is clear; to reduce unnecessary barriers to employment, social \nreintegration for persons convicted of offences, whilst preserving proper safeguards for the \nprotection of society. In other words, it seeks the right balance between second chances and \npublic safety. \nOne of the problems with the present law is that certain convictions may continue to \nappear on a certificate for life, even where in any meaningful sense, they should be treated as \nspent. That defeats the very idea of a spent conviction. Now, if the law recognises that after a \ncertain period of time and subject to certain conditions, a person should be allowed to move \non, then the certificate should reflect that reality. Clause 5 of the Bill addresses that issue. It \nprovides that no conviction will appear on a person’s Certificate of Character where that \nperson has been granted a free pardon, has been discharged absolutely or conditionally or \nfalls within the categories set out in that clause; subject, of course, to the exceptions for \nserious offenses provided for in the First Schedule.  \nThus, subject to that caveat, a conviction will no longer appear where either the person \nhas been given only a fine not exceeding Rs50,000 instead of the current threshold of \nRs5,000 and two years instead of 5 years have elapsed since the date of conviction. Or \nsecondly, whether or not he has also been fined, been sentenced to imprisonment for a term \nnot exceeding five years and ten years have lapsed since the date of that conviction. And \nthirdly, the offense was committed whilst a person was still under the age of 18. That last \nprovision is particularly important. A civilised legal system does not deny that young people \nmake mistakes but neither should it decide that a mistake made in youth must follow a person \nforever into adulthood. If we speak seriously about children reform and the possibility of \nredemption, then the law must speak seriously too. However, Madam Speaker, it is important \nto stress here that these new parameters will not apply to those serious offenses listed in the \nFirst Schedule to the Bill. Convictions listed there will continue to appear on the Certificate \nof Character indefinitely.  \nThis Bill, Madam Speaker, also addresses discrimination in employment. Clause 4 \nprovides that where a person’s Certificate of Character specifies that he has been convicted of \na crime or misdemeanour, his employer shall not discriminate against him where that offense \nis unrelated to the nature of his employment and a prospective employer shall not \ndiscriminate against him where that offense is unrelated to the employment for which he is \nbeing considered. That is obviously a sensible provision. A criminal record is not a magic \nanswer to every employment question. Relevance matters, context matters, not every past \noffense bears on every future occupation. To say otherwise, is simply to replace judgement \nwith reflex. \nClause 12, Madam Speaker, makes the necessary consequential amendment to the \nEqual Opportunities Act so that this protection is clearly reflected there as well. It provides \nthat no employer or prospective employer shall discriminate against another person, where \nthat person’s certificate of character specifies a conviction which is not related to his \nemployment or to the employment for which he is being considered. Here, may I add, as an \nad hoc measure, that the Chairperson of the Equal Opportunities Commission was consulted \nin relation to that amendment. \nClause 7, Madam Speaker, deals with the mode of application for a certificate of \ncharacter. It also provides for regulations to be made by the Attorney General, in consultation \nwith the Director of Public Prosecutions, in relation to matters connected with the application \nprocess. That is entirely proper, the mode of application being essentially administrative. It \nmust be workable, efficient and capable of adjustment when practical experience shows that \nimprovement is needed. Not every administrative detail belongs to the body of an act. \nNow, let me turn to the First Schedule of the Bill which lists the serious offences which \nwill continue to appear on a certificate of character. Generally, there has been a policy \ndecision, Madam Speaker, by the Government to keep certain offences on the First Schedule, \nand, consequently, on certificates for life. These are serious offences such as offences against \nchildren, aggravated assaults, murders, terrorism, trafficking in persons, manslaughter, rape, \ndangerous drugs, offences, etc. \nHowever, the Schedule has been revised for three principal reasons – \n• \nFirst, the current schedule refers to several provisions of the law which have \nalready been repealed. To that extent, it is outdated. \n• \nSecondly, a number of serious offences, which plainly ought to appear on a \ncertificate of character, are not presently included. \n• \nThirdly, and importantly, the current schedule is not user-friendly. It often refers \nonly to sections of enactments without indicating in ordinary language the \noffences to which those sections relate. \nThe new First Schedule corrects those defects. It no longer refers to repealed laws. It \nbroadens the list of serious offences where this is necessary for the protection of society. It \nadds, in a third column, a description of the offence concerned so that the Schedule can be \nunderstood, not only by lawyers with a statute book open in front of them, but by ordinary \ncitizens reading the law as it should be read – plainly. \nMadam Speaker, the list of serious offences has been revised as follows – \nClause 9 of this very Bill, which criminalises tampering with, forging or fraudulently \naltering a certificate of character has been included. \nSecondly, the Child Protection Act with its corresponding sections has been removed, \ngiven that this Act has, since 2020, been repealed by the Children’s Act of that same year. \nAccordingly, a number of provisions under the Children’s Act 2020, which had not been \nincluded when that Act came into operation 6 years ago, have now been included, thereby \nplugging a significant gap. \nThirdly, previously, all offences under the Dangerous Drugs Act were considered to be \nserious offences, and any offence under that Act had to remain on the certificate of character \nfor life. Even a small fine of Rs5,000 for possession of a very small amount of gandia for \npersonal use or for smoking gandia would remain on the certificate of character for life. In \neffect, that was a lifelong sentence for a minor charge, and that was very unfair. It was \nimportant, in our view, to carve out from offences on the Dangerous Drugs Act that type of \noffence.  \nSo, today, a fine of up to Rs50,000 for the possession of a dangerous drug in a minimal \nquantity for personal use or for smoking would eventually disappear from the certificate of \ncharacter after two years. \nFourthly, sections 16 to 20 of the Cybersecurity and Cybercrime Act, for example, \nmisuse of fake profile, cyberbullying, cyber extortion, revenge pornography and \ncyberterrorism have been added to the list. \nSections 3 and 4 of the Financial Intelligence and Anti-Money Laundering Act and the \nPrevention of Corruption Act have been removed since they have been repealed and replaced \nsince 2023 by the Financial Crimes Commission Act. Accordingly, the relevant sections \nunder the Financial Crimes Commission Act have been added to the list. \nSections 58, 59, 64, and 65 of the Representation of the People Act, that is, illegal \npayment, corrupt withdrawal of candidature, bribery and treating and undue influence, which \nare considered to be serious offences, have been added to the list. \nCausing death by careless driving when under influence of alcohol, drug or intoxicating \nsubstance, in breach of the new section 123D of the Road Traffic Act, is now considered to \nbe a serious offence, serious enough to be included in that schedule, Madam Speaker. \nLastly, all the sections of the Criminal Code have been reviewed. Some have been \nremoved either because they have already been repealed or because are considered to be less \nserious offences, given the sentence provided, and some new sections of the Criminal Code \nhave been added. For example, we have sections 52 to 56, 76A, 85, 87, et j’en passe, which \nhave been removed since they no longer exist.  \nOffences such as enticing away servants, pawnbroking and money lending without a \nlawful authority, hindering judicial sale, disturbing a religious ceremony, involuntary \nhomicide, wounds and blows, taking part in an unlawful assembly have been removed since \nthey are not as serious as warranting that they remain on that list. \nHere, Madam Speaker, I must add that amendments will be brought, at Committee \nStage, to reflect the fact that after careful review it is now being proposed that some further \noffences do not deserve to be on the First Schedule list of serious offences, while others \nought to be included on that list. Last night, because of that, I have circulated to all Members \nof the House a new amended schedule with all the changes tracked so that they can follow \nwhat will happen at Committee Stage on the next occasion. \nOne of the offences which would not remain on that list is, for example, simple larceny. \nA very common offence which young offenders may commit and whose consequences stay \nwith them for life. At the same time, more serious cases of larceny, such as larceny with \nviolence and larceny by night breaking, will remain on the First Schedule. This, Madam \nSpeaker, is a concrete example of the balancing exercise which we are doing here between \nrehabilitation and keeping society safe. \nMadam Speaker, the Bill also brings consistency between the English and French \nversions of the certificate itself. A comparative reading of the present forms reveals \nunnecessary differences and some inaccuracies. There are also discrepancies in the \nexplanatory notes and grammatical and structural defects in the French text. These have all \nbeen addressed in the Second and Third Schedules to the Bill. \nMadam Speaker: Wow! \nMr Glover: The Bill also extends the validity of a certificate from three months to four \nmonths. It is a modest amendment, but useful, practical improvement. \nNow, Madam Speaker, before I conclude, I wish to say a word about the suggestion \nthat I have read about in the press, made in some quarters, that there was no need for a new \nbill and that a few amendments to the existing Act would have sufficed. I do not share that \nview.  \nThe Bill before the House runs to nearly 29 pages. The current law is 14 pages long. If \nwe had proceeded by amendment, the amending legislation would itself have been longer and \nmore cumbersome than the Act being amended. Almost every section of the existing law \nwould have had to be amended or repealed. New provisions would have to be inserted. All \nthree Schedules would effectively have to be repealed and replaced. At some point, Madam \nSpeaker, one much choose between patch work and comprehensive legislative drafting. \nThis Bill chooses clarity. When a statutory scheme is being substantially re-worked, \nclarity is better served by repeal and replacement than by a long trail of textual surgery. \nMadam Speaker, this Bill has been prepared through close collaboration between my \nOffice, the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions and the Law Reform Commission. I, \nhere, place on record my appreciation for their work and their inputs. \nThe reform before this House, Madam Speaker, today, is a practical act, but it is also \nsomething more than that. It reflects a view of justice. A view that the law must protect \nsociety, certainly, but also a view that the law must leave room for amendment of life, not \nonly amendment of statutes. A fair legal system is one that punishes where punishment is due \nbut does not continue to punish when the demands of justice have already been met.  \nThat in essence, Madam Speaker, is what this Bill seeks to do and with those words, I \ncommend the Bill to the House. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. It has to be seconded. Thank you, hon. Minister of Agro-\nIndustry.  \nDr. Boolell rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: Maybe it would be wise to break for tea now. Then you can make \nyour speech, hon. Leader of the Opposition. \nAt 4.46 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.23 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, please be seated. \nWe are playing musical chairs? Yes, alright! \nHon. Leader of the Opposition! \n(5.23 p.m.) \nThe Leader of the Opposition (Mr G. Lesjongard): Madam Speaker, thank you for \ngiving me the opportunity to intervene on the Certificate of Character Bill and I shall be brief \nand to the point, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nMr Lesjongard: Allow me at the very outset, Madam Speaker, to say that we support \nthe principle behind the Bill. We believe in rehabilitation and we believe in second chances, \nMadam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker, we recognise that a criminal record, particularly for minor, in relation \nto offences which have taken place a long time back to create some impediments to \nemployment, housing and most importantly, dignity, Madam Speaker. These barriers, if left \nunaddressed, may paradoxically increase the risk of reoffending.  \nWe also, Madam Speaker, acknowledge the Bill’s stated objective is specifically to \nreduce these barriers and facilitate social integration which is necessary for our society.  \nNow, let me start by highlighting some positive measures which render this legislation \nless stringent and which will help abate if not, eliminate those impediments I mentioned \nearlier. Firstly, Madam Speaker, the increase in the fine threshold for eligibility from Rs5,000 \nto Rs50,000. Secondly the waiting period which has now been reduced from five to two \nyears, Madam Speaker. Lastly, the fact that with this upcoming legislation, persons sentenced \nto imprisonment of up to 3 years may receive a clean certificate after 10 prime three years. \nAlso, Madam Speaker, we note that youth offences committed under 18 are now \nautomatically excluded from disclosure and these are, like I said, positive aspects of this \npiece of legislation.  \nIt is also to be noted that Clause 4 of the Bill introduces, like earlier the hon. Attorney \nGeneral stated, a statutory prohibition against employment discrimination where a conviction \nis not related to the role. Now, Madam Speaker, although this is a positive step, it suffers \nfrom an intrinsic defect in the way it has been formulated and its application is like to be \nunpractical and may lead to an inconsistent approach.  Let me explain, Madam Speaker.  \nFirst of all, legislative process on paper does not automatically translate to actual \nliberation on the ground. The critical question before this House today is not whether this Bill \nis less stringent but whether, it will ultimately achieve its aim of effectively reducing the \nbarriers to employment and social integration.  \nUnfortunately, Madam Speaker, the answer is no as this Bill carries unintended \ndisadvantages. Let me illustrate what I just said by referring to the following clauses of the \nBill and I will refer to the clause I mentioned earlier, that is Clause 4 which deals with non-\ndiscrimination and the employment barriers because I believe that this Clause is structurally \nambiguous, Madam Speaker. \nThe Bill as it is, prohibits discrimination only where a conviction is not related to \nemployment yet, we note that this Bill provides no criteria, no guidance and no fast-tract at \njudication mechanism. Employers are thus left to make complex legal judgements in isolation \nand its unintended but natural result would be an utter confusion and lack of understanding in \ngiving effect to that particular clause.  \nMadam Speaker, I fear that without as statutory code of practice from the Equal \nOpportunities Commission and an accessible complaints process, this provision runs the risk \nof being symbolic only. Worse, Madam Speaker, employers’ uncertainty may lead to \novercompliance thereby rejecting all applications with disclosed convictions or informal \nbackground checks that bypass the certificate altogether.  \nMadam Speaker, let me now turn to Clause 6 of the Bill which deals with the \nadministrative capacity and the role of the Director of Public Prosecution. This Clause \ncentralises the issuance of Character Certificate by the office of the Director of Public \nProsecution. Although this may enhance consistency, on the other hand, it raises serious \ncapacity concerns, Madam Speaker. The Director of Public Prosecution constitutional \nmandate is prosecution, not high-volume administrative certification.  \nMadam Speaker, I fear that if there is a surge in application submitted to the DPP’s \noffice, this might give rise to processing delays and create a new bureaucratic barrier, Madam \nSpeaker. It goes without saying that going through the red tape would, in fact, obstruct \nprogress and hinder efficiency.  \nMadam Speaker, the Bill correctly notes that a free pardon under section 75 of our \nConstitution results in a clean certificate but we must be precise. This Bill’s mechanism is not \na pardon; it is what is referred to as an administrative spent conviction whereby certain \nconvictions become spent or are not disclosed after a period of time. Madam Speaker, this is \na totally different concept. Any attempt to combining the two risks compromising and \neroding the solemn constitutional prerogative of mercy which the House should know, is \nreserved for exceptional cases of injustice or extraordinary rehabilitation.  \nFurthermore, Madam Speaker, the exercise of the prerogative of mercy in Mauritius \nhas, in recent years, been the subject of public debate concerning transparency and \naccountability.  \nMadam Speaker, I strongly believe that the time has come to consider legislative or \nprocedural reforms to ensure that the advice of the Commission on the prerogative of mercy \nand the reason for the President’s decision is made public but having said that, it should be \nsubject to necessary safeguards for privacy and national security. You may feel able to agree \nthat this would be a major step in increasing public confidence in the system.  \nMadam Speaker, the Bill introduces a QR Code verification and a dedicated digital \nplatform. Although this is a positive step, unfortunately, it raises a series of questions as it \nlacks explicit data governance provisions. For example, who controls access to the underlying \ndatabase? How will spent convictions be securely archived or deleted? What are the \nsafeguards in place designed to prevent misuse by authorised authorities? The Bill does not \nprovide any formal appeal mechanism for individuals who believe their certificate incorrectly \ndiscloses a conviction.  \nMadam Speaker, let me conclude, like I said, I will be brief, by saying that the measure \nof a just society is not only how it punishes wrong doings but also how it offers a pathway \nback to citizenship for those who have erred and served their debts. This Bill, no doubt, like I \nsaid earlier, represents a step in the right direction but, Madam Speaker, a step taken without \nsafeguards and without practical enforcement mechanism, will fall short of its promise.  \nI am done, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much. \nNow, we have the hon. Minister of Labour.   \n(5.33 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations (Mr R. Uteem): Thank you, \nMadam Speaker. Madam Speaker, when I listen to the hon. Leader of the Opposition, he \nalways fails to justify why in the past 10 years that his government was in power, they did not \ndo anything. And now, when this Government is trying to do something, he is always \ncriticising us.  \nLet me remind the hon. Leader of the Opposition, as far back as 08 September 2015 \nwhen his party was in power, MSM was in power, this is what the hon. Attorney General then \nsaid, the question was about when would amendment to the Certificate of Character Act be \nproposed, he stated – \n“My Office has started consultations with relevant stakeholders in relation to the \namendments to be brought to the Certificate of Character Act.” \nThat was 2015.  \nThen 2016, same Attorney General, said that – \nAs stated in the Government Programme, legislation will be coming to Parliament. We \nare envisaging possibly even avoiding stigma by maybe looking into equal opportunities. It is \nbeing amended as well. But legislation will be forthcoming. \nAgain, hon. Members will note that in line with the Government Programme, \nlegislation will be forthcoming because we are very concerned with the present state of \naffairs as well. It goes on and on like this. Every time, Members of the Opposition had asked \nquestions about the Certificate of Character. They kept saying the same thing each time. \nOn 13 June 2017 – that was the former MSM Attorney General – I wish to assure the \nHouse that amendment to both the Certificate of Character Act – and, as I have said, there are \nother acts as well. I will mention them shortly – they will be brought to this House by the end \nof this year, time permitting. That was back in 2017.  \nSo, they keep saying that they will amend and that they will bring changes, but they \nnever did! So, it is this Government who is coming with the appropriate legislative change to \ncorrect an essential unfairness. \nMadam Speaker, according to Statistics Mauritius, as at June 2025, out of 5,078 adult \nconvicts admitted in prison in 2024, some 3,728 were reoffenders who had been imprisoned \nin the past. That is 73.4% of convicts tend to reoffend. \n In an article published by the lecturers from the University of Technology in Mauritius \nentitled “Trends in Incarceration and Recidivism in Mauritius –Raising the Alarm,” the \nauthors identified the main challenge for rehabilitation and reintegration of ex-detainees as \nthe Certificate of Character, which was an obstacle for gaining employment. \nThis is why, Madam Speaker, the main purpose of the Bill is precisely to reduce \nbarriers to employment and social integration of person who have been convicted of an \noffence.  \nBut it is not only about employment. You know, when I was practicing a few years ago, \na student came to see me. The student wanted to apply for a seat in university. He had \nexcellent grades, but he was very concerned because he had smoked in public. And because \nhe had smoked in public, he had a fine, and because of that fine, he was at risk of not \nsecuring a seat in a university outside of Mauritius. We did what we had to do, which was a \npetition to the President through the Commission on the Prerogative of Mercy. \nWe managed to secure a pardon, but it takes time, and it costs. Another student came to \nsee us only three years ago. She was apprehended for shoplifting. Although she has always \nclaimed to be innocent, somehow, she was not represented. She found herself, on the same \nday, in front of a court, pleading guilty and getting a fine for larceny. Then, she decided to get \nmarried. Because she was getting married to a foreigner, she was not going to get the \nnecessary visa or the necessary residence permit because of that incident, of which, she has \nalways claimed to be innocent.  \nAgain, we had to go through the same system of applying to the President through the \nCommission of Prerogative of Mercy to get a parole. Today, with this law, we are changing it. \nToday, with this law, any offences committed by a juvenile before the age of 18 will be \nexpunged from the Certificate of Character. It will not appear anymore. Petty offences like \nlarceny will no longer appear on the Certificate of Character. Previously, even if you had only \na fine, if it was larceny, it had to appear in your Certificate of Character. \nSo, there are other offences, for example, drug related offences; smoking cannabis, \ngandia; small possession of gandia for consumption; a lot of people have been caught with \nthat. As they say, erreur de jeunesse. But that stigma stays with them all along, throughout \ntheir life. There was no remission, no possibility of expunging this conviction, however \nmundane it may look today, from the Certificate of Character. \nSo, I commend the hon. Attorney General because he did a real balancing act when he \ncame up with this legislation. There are serious offences that are in the First Schedule; serious \noffences that will appear on your Certificate of Character what come may. Even if you have \nonly a fine, even if you did not have imprisonment, it will always be there because society \nrecognises the seriousness of that offence. That is very important. I will tell you why. \nLet us suppose tomorrow, someone is applying to the Ministry of Gender Equality to be \na foster family or for adoption and that person was convicted for sexual assault over a \njuvenile or any other crime against a child many years ago. Obviously, this is a very material \nconsideration to be taken into account when deciding whether to allow that person la garde, \nto become the foster parent of a minor child. \nIf I am a banking institution and I am going to employ someone who is going to deal \nwith money, I need to make sure that that person has not been convicted of an offence \ninvolving dishonesty. Similarly, if someone is going to travel outside of Mauritius, another \ncountry would want to know if that person in Mauritius had been convicted of a serious \noffence like terrorism or other activity which may put the security of their country in \njeopardy. \nSo, this is the balancing act – making sure that in the First Schedule, we have a list of \nmajor offences. That list has been updated because since 2012, there have been new \nlegislations. So, we need to include those new offences that have been created.  \nThen, what this schedule does is it removes certain offences that we consider are no \nlonger serious offences. To give the example already quoted by the hon. Attorney General, \npossession of drugs or offences of larceny. Then, as the hon. Leader of the Opposition rightly \npointed out, the major change in this legislation is that, for the first time, a person who has \nbeen sentenced to imprisonment up to three years, other than a major offence in the First \nSchedule, that person will have a chance to have a Certificate of Character not mentioning his \nconviction for imprisonment after 10 years. That is a big relief for a lot of people who have \nspent their time, their conviction. \nNow, the hon. Leader of the Opposition takes exception to Section 4, which deals with \nequal opportunity when someone looks for employment. May I remind the hon. Leader of the \nOpposition that a similar provision already exists under the Equal Opportunities Act. The \nmajor difference between the provision that exists under the Equal Opportunities Act and \nwhat we are introducing is that under the Equal Opportunities Act, you cannot discriminate \nagainst someone who has been convicted of an offence that is irrelevant. The term used in the \nEqual Opportunities Act was “irrelevant” to the job. A job that you have applied for or the job \nthat you are already in. \nNow, there was an amount of subjectivity when you use “irrelevant.” The employer can \nalways say, for you, it may not look irrelevant. But for me, subjectively, it is very relevant \nthat you smoked gandia 15 years ago. Now, you are replacing that subjective element with an \nobjective criterion, which is, the offence must not be related to the job. So, even if you had \nsmoke gandia in the past, if whatever job you are going to do has absolutely nothing to do \nwith the erreur de jeunesse that you have done. You cannot be discriminated against. \nNow, the hon. Leader of the Opposition says that the law does not provide for any \nsanction. Again, because he does not know how this works. This law works hand-in-hand \nwith the Equal Opportunities Act and Equal Opportunities Act already provides any \nemployee, worker or prospective employee who feels that he has been discriminated on the \nbasis of a conviction, he has to apply to the Equal Opportunities Commission, who carries out \nan investigation. Then the Equal Opportunities Commission refers the matter to the Equal \nOpportunities Tribunal and it is the Equal Opportunities Tribunal who has the power to \nsanction including imposing fines and sending people to jail and other remedial action. So, \nthere is absolutely no reason to include all these provisions again in the Certificate of \nCharacter Act because they are already in the Equal Opportunities Act.  \nThen, the hon. Leader of the Opposition talks about QR code, talks about data \nprotection, talks about all these lacks of security and safety. But if the hon. Leader of the \nOpposition had taken the time to look at the existing law, the existing Certificate of Character \nAct of 2012, he would have found out that these provisions already exist in the law. Already, \nyou do an application online, electronically, and already, if you look at the schedule, you will \nsee the QR code – it is already operating like this. So, nothing has changed. If anything, \nthings would improve. He is saying that the DPP does not have the staff but that is why the \nDPP has the power to delegate. \nIn fact, if he had gone through the system, if he had taken the time, to ask the people \nhow do we get a Certificate of Character, he would have found out that today, it is the police \nwho has the greatest responsibility because whenever there is a conviction, there is a central \ndatabase at the police. So, the police prosecutor is for one who would take the conviction, the \nreport and send it to the centralised system, not the DPP. The DPP does not have record. So, \nwhenever there is someone who applies for a Certificate of Character, the DPP is going to ask \nthe police to retrieve the information from the database of the police which is in a secured \nlocation with all the necessary protection including data protection. So, it is not the DPP. So, \nI am just informing the hon. Leader of the Opposition because, obviously, he has no clue \nabout how a Certificate of Character is applied, how it is delivered. \nMadam Speaker, I am not going to be long. I wish to put on record my sincere thanks \nfor the hon. Attorney General to bring this very important legislation not even two years into \nour mandate and I have no doubt that with this piece of legislation, a lot of people who have \nbeen denied access to a job, who have been denied the ability to be reintegrated, to be \nreinserted in society, will have a second chance. \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much, hon. Minister. \nNow, we have hon. Dr. Ms Daureeawo. \n(5.49 p.m.) \nDr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac): \nThank you, Madam Speaker.  \nMadam Speaker, I rise today to contribute to the debate on the Certificate of Character \nBill. I have carefully sent to all the hon. Members in this House and it appears that it is clear \nthat at its heart, Madam Speaker, this Bill asks an important moral and social question – \nwhether one single mistake after years have passed, after punishment has been served should \ncontinue to block a person from decent work, dignity and a place in society. This Bill, \nMadam Speaker, answers this question, at least in part, by saying no. What we are called to \nconsider is not whether consequences should ensue, – they should, of course, – but whether \nthose consequences should endure indefinitely without regard to time, reform or \nrehabilitation. \nMadam Speaker, I have listened to hon. Uteem who has shared his experience as a \nBarrister and I will also admit that during my years of practice at the Bar, I have witnessed \nindividuals who have been, for too long, trapped in a cycle or rejection, not because of who \nthey are today, but because of who they were once. So, this this is why, Madam Speaker, to \nme, personally, I consider this Bill to be humane and a very meaningful reform. I have \nwitnessed opportunities denied, families strained to breaking point. Consequences have been \ndenied always, Madam Speaker, just because of that single piece of document known as the \nCertificate of Character. Each attempt by many people because of one single mistake end up \nthe same way, denied, dismissed or discarded and this is why, Madam Speaker, I say that \nsecond chances must be real. They should not be merely spoken about. \nI am sure we have all in this House seen and witnessed so many people and families \nwho have gone through the quiet devastation caused not by a court of law but the lingering \nshadow of a document, the Certificate of Character. Recently, the LGSC recruited and we all \nknow how many could not secure the job, not because they were not competent, not because \nit was related to the job but because their Certificate of Character showed that they had a \ncriminal record. \nSo, of course, I am not saying that justice must lose its seriousness. This is not what I \nam saying. I am saying that justice must not lose its humanity, and as the hon. Leader of the \nOpposition rightly pointed out, a just society must know how to punish wrongdoing but it \nmust also know when to build, to allow a human being to rebuild. \nThis Bill to me, – congratulations to the hon. Attorney General – recognises that justice \nmust evolve beyond punishment and embrace rehabilitation. It acknowledges that those who \nhave shown genuine remorse, rebuilt their lives, served their sentence, deserved more than \nperpetual exclusion. They deserve a real opportunity to reintegrate into society.  \nIt is finally about ensuring that one mistake does not become a lifelong sentence. You \nwould agree with me, Madam Speaker, that the human impact can be big. We have seen it in \nour Constituency recently, when people could not secure a job. I recall myself, hon. Uteem \ngave the example of possession of cannabis ruining people’s life for the purposes of \nconsumption. You gave the example of a small larceny and I remember meeting a young guy \nin his early 30s who had been involved in a tragic accident. He was driving at the time; he \ndeeply regrets what happened. There was no question of alcohol or intoxicating substance, to \nhim, it was a moment of poor judgement that led to the tragic loss of life. That person was so \ntraumatised by what happened, Madam Speaker, that he stopped driving altogether. When he \nmet me, he was by now a dutiful son, a responsible husband, a devoted father but yet he \nexplained to me how, because of what that one single document, his life was defined forever. \nHe could not get a decent job and people misjudged him. \nThis made me reflect, Madam Speaker, we have all been asking questions here. This \nmade me reflect, how can we speak of rehabilitation if we deny reintegration? How can we as \na society and even as legislators speak of reducing unemployment while quietly shutting the \ndoors to people willing to work? This is why, I reiterate, I welcome the Bill’s expressed \nprotection against discrimination in employment and for prospective employment. This is, to \nme one, of the most socially constructive parts of the Bill. \nToo often – the hon. Leader of the Opposition recognises this fact – too often, exclusion \nfrom work has been one of the greatest barriers to real reintegration and rehabilitation. And I \nthink you will all agree with me, if we want safer communities, we must also want pathways \nback to lawful work and self-respect. A society that leaves no room for redemption should not \nbe surprised when it struggles to achieve rehabilitation.  \nI am not saying, of course, Madam Speaker – maybe people might misinterpret – that \nwe should remove proper safeguards. They should be here and let us be clear, this Bill does \nnot wipe away serious crimes. Serious crimes will still remain on the Certificate of Character \nthrough the First Schedule and the hon. Attorney General has stated what offenses will \nremain in the First Schedule and on the Certificate of Character. I am citing a few – \n• \noffenses involving children; \n• \nterrorism, and \n• \nmajor criminal code offenses. \nSuch that it is clear, dangerous offenders will not benefit from this reform but for those who \nhave committed lesser offenses, those who have reformed, rebuilt; this Bill gives them \nsomething profoundly important: a second chance and a genuine one. \nSo, this Bill, Madam Speaker, reflects an important shift. It is a more proportionate \napproach distinguishing between seriousness and lesser offending. It distinguishes between \nrisk and rehabilitation and it distinguishes between permanent danger and genuine reform. I \nhave also gone through section 5 of the Bill which is the major central reform clause. I will \nnot go through it again. Some may say this is leniency. It is not leniency. This is fairness. And \nI also welcome the section regarding young offenders. This is fair and forward looking, \nMadam Speaker, because we have to agree that youngsters do make mistakes but they also \nhave the capacity to change. And if we want a balanced approach, that is the correct one, one \nthat protects society while also investing in the potential of our youth.  \nSo, while support in principle, Madam Speaker, is good, I want to scrutinise the details. \nI only have one remark and I do not know if the hon. Attorney General will be able to \nconsider that through the regulations. There is a broader point we have to reflect on; it is the \nefficiency of our system, Madam Speaker. So, this is why I will urge the hon. Attorney \nGeneral through the regulations to impose a deadline within which the certificates will be \nissued following an application by a citizen because at the end of the day, Madam Speaker, \nwhen we say that a system that aspires to fairness should also aspire to timeliness.  \nSo, I will not be longer than that. I will sum up by saying that, while urging careful \nattention to safeguards in implementation, I support this Bill because to me, Madam Speaker, \nit reduces barriers to employment, it promotes social integration, family stability, reduces \nreoffending and ultimately creates a safer and more inclusive society. I cannot end without \ncongratulating the hon. Attorney General and the Government for coming forward with this \nreform and as we say at the end of the day, a country is not judged only by how firmly it \npunishes and condemns wrong doings, Madam Speaker, but also by whether it leaves room \nfor reform, responsibility and return. I commend the Bill to this House. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much. We are doing very well from the time point \nof view. Hon. Baboolall! \n(5.59 p.m.) \nMr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE): Thank you, \nMadam Speaker, for allowing me to participate in the debate. \nMadam Speaker, the Certificate of Character Bill 2026 seeks to repeal and replace the \nlongstanding Certificate of Character Act 2012. I thank the hon. Attorney General for \nbringing in the Bill. This is a way forward. \nMadam Speaker, at the outset, we acknowledge that updating outdated legislation is a \nnecessary function of this House. The 2012 Act has served for over a decade. However, the \ncurrent system has at times proven fragmented, inconsistent and vulnerable to delays and \nmisuse. That said, this Bill goes beyond mere modernisation, it fundamentally reshapes how \nwe treat individuals with criminal convictions in our society. \nMadam Speaker, in this Bill – as has already been enlightened by my learned friend \nbarristers as well – clause 4 proposes non-discrimination in employment. Clause 5 which is \none of the main clauses, subsection (1)(a) to (g) relates to Certificate of Character with no \ncriminal record but the offenses should not fall under the First Schedule. Clause 6 is where \nthe Certificate of Character will be issued with criminal record if none of the circumstances \nin clause 5 are applicable. There is also a consequential amendment by clause 12 in relation \nto the Equal Opportunities Act. \nMadam Speaker, the Certificate of Character is not merely an administrative document. \nFor many citizens, it is a gateway to employment, education, travel, immigration and \nprofessional licensing. Under the previous law, all convictions could appear on the certificate, \noften creating permanent and disproportionate barriers, particularly for minor offenses. For \nmany individuals, this document determines whether they are afforded a second chance. \nMadam Speaker, we support measures that enhance public trust and national security. \nIntegrity in public life and employment is essential. However, legislation must strike a careful \nbalance between safeguarding society and protecting fundamental rights. While we support \nthis principle of the Bill, there remain some questions that merit clarification. \nMadam Speaker, our society believes in second chances. A person who has paid his or \nher debt to society should have a realistic opportunity to rebuild their life. Clause 5 introduces \nreforms aimed at reducing barriers to employment and social reintegration for individuals \nwith minor convictions who have demonstrated good conduct. This reflects the principles of \nfairness, proportionality and rehabilitation. \nMadam Speaker, legislation must not only protect society, it must strengthen it and \nsociety is not strengthened by permanent exclusion but by responsible reintegration. The Bill \ndoes not clearly define an outline on how to rehabilitate people. Madam Speaker, clause 6 \nraises some concerns. If not carefully administered, the system risks creating what we may \nperceive as a way of perpetual punishment. A certificate regime that continues to heavily \npenalise individuals without adequate mechanisms for review, expungement or meaningful \nrehabilitation may ultimately increase recidivism rather than reducing it. \nMadam Speaker, the Bill also strengthens anti-discrimination protection by amending \nsection 10 of the Equal Opportunities Act. Employers would be prohibited from refusing \nemployment solely on the basis of a conviction unrelated to the job offered, provided there is \nno real risk to the employer’s operation or reputation. This is a progressive step but not \nwithout setbacks.  \nMadam Speaker, public safety concerns must also be addressed. While easing \nrestrictions on minor convictions promote reintegration, certain sectors, particularly financial \ninstitutions and positions requiring high level of trust may require greater transparency. The \nBill is largely silent on how such sectors are to balance non-discrimination with legitimate \nrisk assessment. This tension requires clearer legislative guidance to specific risk sectors. It is \nof utmost importance to discuss whether certain sectors like banking, child care and elderly \ncare should have specialised access to full records as the current Bill’s general less intrigant \napproach might not account for the high level of trust required in these specific roles. \nMadam Speaker, balancing these rehabilitative goals with public safety and the \nconcerns of employers draws a robust line of reasoning on the reputation against \nreintegration. Tensions are inherent in the Bill.  \nThe reputational risk loophole may emerge. This could allow employers to bypass the \nanti-discrimination intent of the Bill by claiming any past conviction, however minor, that \nharms their corporate image. \nMadam Speaker, another area requiring some clarifications concerns the prerogative \nmercy under Section 75 of the Constitution. Clause 5 recognises that a person who has been \ngranted a free pardon may obtain a certificate without criminal record.  \nHowever, some questions arise – \n• \nCan an individual apply immediately to the Commission on the Prerogative of \nMercy following sentencing without waiting for the lapse of the time required \nunder clause 5? \n• \nDoes clause 6 imply that a certificate with criminal records remains for life? Can \na pardon not be granted in these circumstances? \n• \nDoes it stop someone from applying to the Commission on the Prerogative of \nMercy? \n• \nIf ever a free pardon is granted, where do we draw the line in relation to this Bill? \nHow does this interact with the judicial review by the DPP? \nMadam Speaker, in De Boucherville Roger F P v State 2009 SCJ 5, the Supreme Court \nreaffirmed principles established in Poongavanam v The Commission on the Prerogative of \nMercy 1999 SCJ 396, holding that decisions of the Commission are amenable to judicial \nreview where constitutional breaches occur. The court recognises the quasi-judicial nature the \nCommission’s functions and emphasises that its power must be exercised with rigour, \nintegrity and honesty. \nMadam Speaker, given that the Commission may effectively alter court-imposed \nsentences, the safeguards surrounding its decisions are fundamental to preserving the \nseparation of powers and public confidence in the justice system. There are growing \ndiscussions internationally about strengthening oversight mechanism over executive pardon \npowers to ensure appropriate checks and balances. This is a golden opportunity to address \nthis issue as well because this Bill will directly or indirectly affect the Commission on the \nPrerogative of Mercy. \nMadam Speaker, while the Bill allows for the omission of convictions involving up to \nthree years of imprisonment, it requires a 10-year clean record. On the other hand, it can also \nbe argued that decade is too long for someone trying to re-enter the work force immediately \nafter serving the time, potentially leading to recidivism due to lack of opportunity if there is \nno rehabilitation programme. \nMadam Speaker, governance must evolve with a modernising nation. The Certificate of \nCharacter Bill 2026 reflects an effort to modernise our legal framework and protect civil \nliberties. Its objectives are commendable. However, clarity, safeguards and precision are \nnecessary. \nMadam Speaker, we support the Bill in relation to ensure that the certificate of \ncharacter system protects society, promotes responsible second chances and upholds the \ndignity and rights of all Mauritians, and for us to have a better criminal justice system. \nMadam Speaker, with those observations, I commend the Bill to the House. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Babajee! \n(6.09 p.m.) \nMr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River): Thank you, Madam \nSpeaker. \nMadam Speaker, let me, first of all, thank the Attorney General for this commitment to \nintroduce this Bill to this House.  \nBefore starting, let me remind everyone here that before 2006, there were no laws in \nregards to moral certificate. It is only this Prime Minister, hon. Navinchandra Ramgoolam, \nwho brought the Certificate of Morality Act 2006. It is only after six years, 2012, again with \nthe Labour Party, the Certificate of Character Act was introduced, repealing the other one.  \nFrom 2014 to 2024, the previous government had 10 years to adjust and review all the \ndefects, but nothing was done. As my colleague just said, hon. Reza Uteem, every time laws \nwere being introduced, proposals and everything, but nothing was done. But today, the \npresent Attorney General got the courage to bring it within two years in power. We need to \nthank him for this courageous decision. \nMadam Speaker, today, I give my full and unequivocal support to the Certificate of \nCharacter Bill, a piece of legislation that goes to the very heart of justice, fairness and human \ndignity in our republic. This debate invites us to reflect not only on law, but on the values that \nunderpin our society: compassion, fairness, and the belief in human redemption.  \nThe proposed repeal of the Certificate of Character Act 2012 and its replacement with a \nmore balanced and humane framework mark a decisive step towards restoring dignity and \nopportunity to those who have long been defined and confined by their past mistakes. For too \nlong, a document intended to reflect a person’s character has instead function as a lifelong \nbarrier. A single conviction, often for minor offence, has trailed individuals for years, if not \ndecades, closing the door to employment, limiting access to education and obstructing \nmeaningful reintegration into society. This Bill recognises a simple yet profound proof: \npeople can change. \nMadam Speaker, under the new provisions, individuals who have committed minor \noffences or offences resulting in small fines or short-term imprisonment will no longer carry \nthat burden indefinitely. After reasonable and just periods, such records will no longer appear \non certain certificate of character. This is not about erasing wrongdoing. It is about \nrecognising growth. It is about acknowledging rehabilitation. And above all, it is about \ngranting second chances. \nWe must, in particular, Madam Speaker, consider the impact on our youth. A mistake \nmade before the age of 18 should not cast a shadow over an entire lifetime. Youth is a time of \nlearning and sometimes of error, but ensuring that such mistakes do not permanently stain a \nyoung person’s future, we give them the opportunity to rebuild, to contribute and to succeed.  \nYet, Madam Speaker, what have we seen in the last 10 years, from 2014 to 2024? We \ngot synthetic drugs coming in our society. We got all those youngsters consuming those \nsynthetic drugs, getting caught with those drugs or getting caught with cannabis. This is the \nreason why he took this decision today to facilitate those people’s rehabilitation in our \nsociety. \nUnder the abled leadership of our Prime Minister, this Government has demonstrated a \nclear commitment to build a fairer and more inclusive society. One that balances \naccountability with compassion and discipline with opportunity.  \nMadam Speaker, one thing we need to ask is: is this justice like it is now, or is it a \nsystem that punishes not once, but repeatedly? We must confront an uncomfortable reality. \nWhen we deny individuals a fair opportunity to reintegrate, we do not merely punish them, \nwe marginalise them. We risk pushing them towards despair, exclusion, and in some cases, \ntowards the very path we seek to prevent.  \nA young graduate denied employment despite merit may lose hope. A reformed \nindividual, repeatedly rejected, may feel abandoned by the system, and in that void, the \ndangers of social evils, drug abuse, dependency or criminal influence become ever more real. \nAs my neighbour just said, how many people were rejected for work at the LGSC? Just to \ncollect refuse, some people were denied a job only because of their certificate of character. \nMadam Speaker, there are deeply troubling cases of students who during their \nformative years committed minor infractions. Today, they are educated, reformed and ready \nto contribute. Yet, they remain excluded because their Certificate of Character continues to \nreflect those past errors.  \nThis Bill represents a compassionate and principle shift in our legal framework. It \naffirms that justice must not end at punishment, it must extend to rehabilitation and \nreintegration. It is fundamentally unjust that individuals who have been granted a free pardon \nor who have been discharged, whether absolutely or conditionally should continue to suffer \nthe consequences of those offences through administrative barriers.  \nThis Bill corrects that imbalance. Let me be clear. This reform does not weaken the rule \nof law, Madam Speaker, it strengthens it. Because true justice is not only firm, it is fair. It \ndoes not only punish but it also restores. \nMadam Speaker, I wish to thank the hon. Attorney-General for bringing forward this \ntimely and necessary reform. It reflects a clear understanding of the lived realities of our \ncitizens and a genuine commitment to building a more inclusive and equitable Mauritius. \nBehind every certificate, Madam Speaker, lies a human story, a story of error, yes, but also of \ngrowth, of effort and of determination to do better.  \nLet us not allow the mistakes of the past to become permanent barriers to the future. Let \nus instead affirm through this Bill a principle that is both simple and powerful, that a person \nis more than their worse mistake. Let this House send a clear and unwavering message today \n– Mauritius believes in second chances. Mauritius believes in fairness and Mauritius believes \nin its people. \nMadam Speaker, I wholeheartedly support this Bill. I commend it to the House. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nYes, hon. Ramdass! \nMr Ramdass: Madam Speaker, I move that the debate be now adjourned. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. \nMr Mohamed rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nDebate adjourned accordingly. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Prime Minister. \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Tuesday 28 April 2026 at 11.30 a.m. \nDr. Boolell rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. The House stands adjourned! \nAt 6.18 p.m. the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 28 April 2026 at \n11.30 a.m. \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nMAURITIUS’ SDDS+ STATUS  UPGRADE – MEASURES & BENEFITS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/445",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 445,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/445) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Attorney General whether, in regard to the New Court House, he will, for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether a maintenance contract has been \nawarded in relation thereto and, if so, indicate – \n(a) \nthe name of the contractor, and  \n(b) \nwhether water leakages during rainfall and poor air-conditioning have been \nreported thereat and remedial measures being taken, if any.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFOREIGN WORKERS’ RECRUITMENT – AUTHORISED AGENCIES – \nMONITORING MECHANISMS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/446",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 446,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floréal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/446) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the \nMinister of Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to foreign workers, he will – \n(a) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the – \n(i) \ncurrent number of agencies authorised for the recruitment thereof, \nindicating whether the list thereof will be tabled together with the names of \nthe beneficial owner/s in each case, and  \n(ii) \nnumber of licences refused, suspended or revoked over the past three years, \nindicating the reasons therefor, and  \n(b) \nstate the monitoring mechanisms in place to prevent abuse, the charging of illegal \nfees and collusion in the recruitment thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPESTICIDES REGULATORY OFFICE – OFFICERS POSTING – REDUCTION \nREASONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/447",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 447,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "B/447\nThe Honourable Third Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or \n(Mr Etwareea) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, \nBlue Economy and Fisheries – \n \nWhether, in regard to unexploited agricultural land, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the total \nextent thereof country-wide, indicating the (a) reasons \ntherefor and (b) measures being envisaged to incentivise the \ncultivation thereof to ensure food self-sufficiency and \nsecurity? \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                     PAGE 16 of 29 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/448",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 448,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "B/448\nThe Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand \nRiver South East (Mr Saumtally) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Youth and Sports – \n \nWhether, in regard to the current sports infrastructure in \nConstituency No. 10 and in the light of the forthcoming major \nsporting events, he will state (a) whether the upgrading \nthereof in line with international norms is being envisaged \nand (b) the training facilities and professional support \nenvisaged for athletes using facilities thereat, indicating in \neach case, the timeline for the implementation thereof?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/449",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 449,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floreal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/449) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the \nMinister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to \nthe Pesticides Regulatory Office, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, \ninformation as to the reasons for the reduction in the number of officers posted thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nWATER SUPPLY – MUDDY/MURKY WATER COMPLAINTS –REMEDIAL \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/450",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 450,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/450) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to water \nsupply, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, \ninformation as to whether it is in presence of complaints to the effect that same is muddy or \nmurky and, if so, indicate the – \n(a) \nreasons therefor, and  \n(b) \nremedial measures being taken in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCAMBRIDGE EXAMINATIONS – MAURITIAN CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE \n– REMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/451",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 451,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "B/451\nThe Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue (Mrs Savabaddy) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Gender Equality and Family \nWelfare – \n \nWhether, in regard to minors found loitering and/or begging \non public streets, she will (a) for the benefit of the House, \nobtain information as to the (i) number of reported cases \nthereof and (ii) reasons therefor, indicating, in each case, \nwhether same is attributable to abandonment and/or having \nbeen driven out by family members and (b) state the \nmeasures being envisaged for the timely identification, \nrescue and rehabilitation thereof? \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                     PAGE 17 of 29 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/452",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 452,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "B/452\nThe Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River  \n(Mr Jugurnauth) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, \nBlue Economy and Fisheries – \n \nWhether, in regard to agricultural and seafood products,  \nhe will state whether consideration will be given for the \nmaximisation thereof from the outer islands to ensure food \nsecurity as opposed to relying on imports thereof amidst the \nMiddle East conflict?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/453",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 453,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "B/453\nThe Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine \nMagnien (Mr Apollon) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness – \n \nWhether, in regard to the methadone programme, he will \nstate where matters stand as to the proposed setting up of a \ntechnical joint working group in relation thereto, indicating \nthe (a) terms of reference thereof and (b) implementation \ntimeframe therefor?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/454",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 454,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/454) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the \nperformance of Mauritian candidates in the last Cambridge International Examinations, he \nwill state the – \n(a) \nremedial measures being envisaged to address same, and  \n(b) \nresponsibility of the different authorities, particularly, the Quality Assurance and \nInspection Division, in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFLEET MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/455",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 455,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/455) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the proposed implementation of \nthe Fleet Management System, he will state where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 8 – WATER PIPE LAYING WORKS – ROADS \nREINSTATEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/456",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 456,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/456) Mr G. P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to water pipe laying \nworks carried out in Constituency No. 8, Quartier Militaire and Moka, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, the list of roads concerned therewith, \nindicating the ones which have not been thereafter reinstated, indicating the reasons and \ntimeframe set therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nAPPEAL COMMITTEE – PENDING APPEALS – REMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/457",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 457,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "B/457\nThe Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart \n(Dr Prayag) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness – \n \nWhether, in regard to CT and MRI Scans, he will state the total \nnumber thereof carried out in public health institutions over \nthe past five years, on a yearly basis, indicating the  \n(a) number of patients transferred between public health \ninstitutions through the SAMU therefor and (b) dates and \nduration of any breakdown of the CT and MRI Scan machines?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/458",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 458,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/458) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Appeal Committee \nof his Ministry, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number and \ntype of appeals pending before the Board thereof over the past two years, indicating the – \n(a)  timeframe set for the consideration thereof, and  \n(b)  measures being envisaged to address the delays in determining the appeals.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nALALILA PLATFORM – TAXIS OPERATORS REPRESENTATIONS – ACTIONS \nTAKEN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/459",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 459,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "B/459\nThe Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Social Integration, Social Security \nand National Solidarity – \n \nWhether, in regard to the planters and farmers in Rodrigues \nIsland affected by the recent torrential rainfalls, he will for \nthe benefit of the House, obtain from the National Solidarity \nFund, information as to the assistance being provided thereto, \ngiving details thereof and the number of beneficiaries and, if \nnot, indicate the reasons therefor and whether same will be \nreviewed? \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                     PAGE 19 of 29 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/460",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 460,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/460) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the introduction of the Alalila platform \npowered by Uber in Mauritius, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National \nLand Transport Authority, information as to whether – \n(a)  it is in presence of representations from some taxis operators regarding same, and  \n(b)  the approval of the Authority was sought and obtained prior thereto and, if so, \nindicate the conditions attached thereto and, if not, indicate the actions that will \nbe taken in relation thereto, if any.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRENEWAL ENERGY TRANSITION – WIND ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE – \nDEVELOPMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/461",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 461,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/461) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to our objective \nto accelerate our energy transition in terms of renewable energy sources, he will state the \nexisting wind energy infrastructure in Mauritius, indicating the – \n(a)  future proposed developments thereof;  \n(b)  targets set therefor, and  \n(c)  challenges and opportunities thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nVACOAS-PHOENIX – NEW DRAINS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS – PERIOD \nSEPTEMBER 2025 TO APRIL 2026",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/462",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 462,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/462) Mr K. Lobine (First Member for La Caverne & Phoenix) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the construction of new drains within the \ntownship of Vacoas-Phoenix, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nthe number of projects approved therefor since September 2025 to date, indicating the \nnumber thereof in respect of which funds have been allocated, further indicating in each case, \nthe date of allocation of contract.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \n \nBOIS DES AMOURETTES – CREMATION GROUND – ROAD REINSTATEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/463",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 463,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "B/463\nThe Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and \nMontagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations– \n \nWhether, in regard to the case of approximately 80 expatriate \nemployees of the Alpha Cleaning Group recently deported or \nin the process thereof, with no right of re-entry, he will, state \nthe reasons therefor and the sanctions, if any, taken against \nthe said company? \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                     PAGE 20 of 29 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/464",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 464,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/464) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the cremation ground at Bois \ndes Amourettes, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether \nconsideration will be given for the reinstatement of the road leading thereto and of the \nfacilities provided thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE – ISLAND-WIDE NETWORK COVERAGE – \nIMPROVEMENT MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/465",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 465,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/465) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation \nwhether, in regard to the rolling out of Artificial Intelligence, he will – \n(a) state whether increased pressure on bandwidth requirements, particularly, in respect \nof mobile data is being anticipated, and \n(b)  for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the measures being \nenvisaged by mobile network operators to ensure adequate network coverage \nisland-wide, particularly, in areas currently experiencing low to no coverage \nthereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nKOREK MOBILE APPLICATION – PUBLIC ACCESS – FACILITATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/466",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 466,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Lukeeram)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/466) Mr C. Lukeeram (Third Member for Mahebourg & Plaine Magnien) \nasked the Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in \nregard to the KOREK mobile application, he will state the measures, if any, undertaken by \nhis Ministry to facilitate public access thereto and the use of the e-government services \navailable thereon.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/420) \nROSE BELLE – FOOTBALL GROUND – ACCESS FEES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/467",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 467,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rodrigues (Mrs Henriette-Manan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "B/467\nThe \nHonourable \nThird \nMember \nfor \nRodrigues  \n(Mrs Henriette-Manan) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Youth and Sports – \n \nWhether, in regard to the participation of athletes from \nRodrigues Island in international competitions, he will  \n(a) for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the \namount of funds allocated therefor since January 2025 to \ndate, giving a breakdown thereof discipline-wise and (b) state \nwhether consideration will be given for the setting up of a \nmechanism, in collaboration with the National Sports \nFederations, to ensure that funding of athletes for their \nparticipation \nin \nnational \nselections \nfor \ninternational \ncompetitions?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/468",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 468,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Seeburn)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/468) Mr M. Seeburn (Second Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the access fees to the football \nground at Rose Belle, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Sports \nCouncil, information as to whether consideration will be given for the reduction or the waiver \nthereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nTWAHA ACADEMY – MINORS AGGRESSION ALLEGATIONS – INQUIRY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/469",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 469,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/469) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the alleged \ncases of aggression and ill-treatment of two minors at the Twaha Academy, she will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Family Support Unit, information as to whether an \ninquiry has been initiated thereinto and, if so, indicate the outcome thereof and the measures \ntaken in connection therewith.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMEDICATIONS – REGISTRATION – ALTERNATIVE PROCUREMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/470",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 470,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/470) Dr F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to medications, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Pharmacy Board, information as to the \nnumber of applications for registration thereof awaiting approval over the 12-month period \nending 01 March 2026, indicating – \n (a) in each case, the name of the medication and of the importer concerned therewith, \nand  \n(b)  whether, on account of non-availability thereof on the market, alternative means \nfor the procurement thereof were sought, particularly for use in public hospitals.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBOIS PIGNOLET, MAIN ROAD – WATER LEAKAGE – REMEDIAL ACTIONS \n\n121",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/471",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 471,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "B/471\nThe Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River  \n(Mr Jugurnauth) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Arts and Culture – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Office of Le Morne Heritage Trust \nFund, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information \nas to the rent payable therefor?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/472",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 472,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/472) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the water \nleakage along the main road at Bois Pignolet, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Central Water Authority, information as to the causes thereof, indicating when same \nwill be remedied.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCULTURAL DESK – PROPOSED SETTING UP",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/473",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 473,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/473) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked \nthe Minister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the proposed setting up of a cultural \ndesk that would act as a one-stop shop for concert organisers and artists, he will state where \nmatters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIUS POST LTD – FINANCIAL SITUATION – REASONS & REMEDIAL \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/474",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 474,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "B/474\nThe Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Arts and Culture – \n \nWhether, in regard to the proposed signing of a Memorandum \nof Understanding on Cultural Cooperation with the Rodrigues \nRegional Assembly for the period 2026–2029, he will state  \n(a) the reasons therefor and (b) how the implementation \nthereof is expected to ensure equitable opportunities for \nRodriguan artists and practitioners in respect of exchanges, \ntraining and heritage promotion at local, regional and \ninternational levels?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/475",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 475,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/475) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nInformation Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in regard to the Mauritius \nPost Ltd., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain therefrom, information as to the current \nfinancial situation thereof, indicating the – \n(a) \nreasons therefor; \n(b)  impact thereof on the employees, and  \n(c) \nmeasures being envisaged to address same.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPETIT RAFFRAY – MULTI-PURPOSE SPORTS ARENA – CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/476",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 476,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/476) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to Petit Raffray Village, he will state \nwhether consideration will be given for the construction of a Multi-Purpose Sports Arena \nequipped with full facilities thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSAINT-CROIX SOCIAL WELFARE CENTRE – NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/477",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 477,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/477) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the \ndemolition of the building housing the Saint-Croix Social Welfare Centre to make way for a \nMulti-Use Games Area project, she will state whether provision has been made for the \nconstruction of a new building to house the said centre and, if not, why not and, if so, where \nmatters stand, indicating the reasons for the delay in the implementation thereof and the \nexpected start and completion dates thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIUS & RODRIGUES – PIG BREEDING – PORK & PORK \nPRODUCTS – MARKET DEMAND",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/478",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 478,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/478) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to pig \nbreeding, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number of pigs \ncurrently being reared in mainland Mauritius and Rodrigues Island respectively, indicating in \neach case, the – \n(a) \nyearly market demand for pork and pork products and import sources thereof, and \n(b) \nfacilities available and support provided to the pig breeders.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUES – DIRECTOR OF AUDIT REPORT – STRUCTURAL REFORMS \n– EVALUATION MECHANISMS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/479",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 479,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine Magnien (Mr Apollon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "B/479\nThe Honourable Second Member for Mahebourg and Plaine \nMagnien (Mr Apollon) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Local Government – \n \nWhether, in regard to the M1, M2 and M3 motorways, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the local authorities, \ninformation as to (a) the segments thereof not presently \nequipped with street lighting, indicating, in each case, \nwhether consideration will be given for the provision of street \nlighting thereat and (b) whether consideration will be given \nfor the replacement of the existing street lanterns by LED \nlanterns and, if so, when and, if not, why not?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/480",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 480,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms",
      "question": "(No. B/480) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nPublic Service and Administrative Reforms whether, in regard to the shortcomings noted by \nthe Director of Audit in his last report in respect of Rodrigues Island, he will state whether \nconsideration will be given for the introduction of structural reforms, capacity building \nprogrammes, and appropriate follow-up and evaluation mechanisms with a view to enhancing \nthe efficiency of public officers in the discharge of their duties thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGRAND BAY WATERFRONT – MASTERPLAN PREPARATION & \nIMPLEMENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/481",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 481,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/481) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, in \nregard to the Grand Bay Waterfront, he will state whether consideration is being given for the \npreparation of a Masterplan for the development thereof under Public Private Partnership \nand, if so, indicate the expected timeframe for the preparation and implementation thereof \nand, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMINISTRY OF GENDER – POST OF PSYCHOLOGIST– SCHEME OF DUTIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/482",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 482,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/482) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the post of \npsychologist at the level of her Ministry, she will state the – \n(a) \nscheme of duties and qualification requirements therefor, and \n(b) \ncurrent number thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFISHERMAN REGISTRATION CARD – CERTIFICATE OF CHARACTER – \nPREREQUISITE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/483",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 483,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/483) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the Fisherman Registration Card, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to whether it is a prerequisite for the applicants to hold a clean Certificate of \nCharacter for eligibility thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCLIMATE CRISIS – SOCIAL PROTECTION – VULNERABLE PERSONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/484",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 484,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/484) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister \nof Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity whether, in regard to the social \nprotection of vulnerable persons against the impact of climate crisis, he will state the – \n(a) \nmeasures in place or being envisaged to mitigate the effects thereof and assistance \nprovided to those affected thereby, and \n(b) \nmechanisms for – \n(i) \nthe sustainable financing thereof; \n(ii) \nthe rapid disbursement of funds in case of climate-related disasters, and \n(iii) ensuring long-term financial resilience in the post-disaster period.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nDRUG ADDICTION AMONG ADOLESCENTS – PUBLIC HEALTH DATA & \nMEASURES \n\n124",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/485",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 485,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/485) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to drug-related health \nconditions, he will state the number of adolescents admitted in public health institutions \ntherefor over the past five years on a yearly basis, indicating if an assessment of the drug-\naddiction level of adolescents in Mauritius has been carried out and, if so, indicate the \nmeasures being implemented or envisaged to address same.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGRANT-AIDED PRIVATE SECONDARY SCHOOLS – TEACHER \nREDUNDANCIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/486",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 486,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/486) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to teachers \nemployed in Government grant-aided private secondary schools, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to the number thereof who have been or will be declared \nredundant in the current academic year – \n(a) \ngiving a breakdown thereof by school and by subject, and \n(b) \nindicating the reasons therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nNPF & NSF– FINANCIAL POSITION & INVESTMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/487",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 487,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "B/487\nThe Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart \n(Dr Prayag) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Youth and Sports – \n \nWhether, in regard to the renovation works being carried out \nat the Rivière du Rempart Youth Centre, he will for the benefit \nof the House, obtain information as to the expected \ncompletion date thereof, indicating the outcome of the site \nvisit he recently effected thereat?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/488",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 488,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix (Mr Lobine)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "B/488\nThe Honourable First Member for La Caverne and Phoenix  \n(Mr Lobine) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Land Transport – \n \nWhether, in regard to bus service operation along Hermitage, \nCinq Arpents, Belle Terre, Highlands and Camp Fouquereaux, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the  \nNational Land Transport Authority, information as to \nwhether it is in presence of representations from \nstakeholders and residents thereof for additional operators \nthereat and, if so, indicate whether consideration is being \ngiven thereto, giving details thereof?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/489",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 489,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/489) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked \nthe Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity whether, in regard \nto the National Pensions Fund and the National Solidarity Fund, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Investment Committee thereof, information as to the – \n(a) \nbalance currently standing to the credit thereof, and \n(b) \ninvestments effected since 2015 to date, indicating the profit or loss realised \nthereon.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSECONDARY SCHOOLS – SYNTHETIC DRUG CASES & PREVENTIVE \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/490",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 490,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "B/490\nThe Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart \n(Dr Prayag) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness – \n \nWhether, in regard to the commitment of Government to \nimplement a Pharmacare System for the provision of free \naccess to prescribed medicines not available in the public \nhealth sector in line with paragraph 51 of the Government \nProgramme 2025-2029, he will state where matters stand, \nindicating the preparatory works or measures undertaken to \ndate, if any, and the categories of diseases and/or medicines \nbeing prioritised thereunder?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/491",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 491,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/491) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked \nthe Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the secondary schools, \nhe will state the number of reported cases of introduction, possession and consumption of \nsynthetic drugs thereat over the past ten years, indicating the measures being taken to prevent \nthe recurrence thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nELECTRICITY TARRIF INCREASE 15% – HOUSEHOLDS IMPACT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/492",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 492,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/492) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the announced 15 \npercent increase in electricity tariffs as from May 2026, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Central Electricity Board, information as to – \n(a) \nwhether an assessment of the impact thereof on households and small businesses \nhas been carried out, indicating the measures being envisaged to mitigate the \nimpact thereof on vulnerable consumers, and \n(b) \nthe number of households having has their electricity supply disconnected over \nthe past year on account of non-payment of bills.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/22",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 22,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "A/22\nThe Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka \n(Dr Ms Thannoo) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,   \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands – \n \nWhether, in regard to racism and racial discrimination, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the \nnumber of cases thereof reported to the Equal Opportunities \nCommission since 2015 to 2024, indicating the (a) nature and \noutcome thereof, including the number thereof referred to \nthe Equal Opportunities Tribunal and (b) additional \nmeasures being envisaged to address same in Mauritius?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/23",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 23,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "A/23\nThe Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka \n(Dr Ms Thannoo) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,   \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands – \n \nWhether, \nin \nregard \nto \nthe \nMauritius \nBroadcasting \nCorporation, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to whether an inquiry has been initiated to \nascertain the veracity of the financial reports thereof for the \nperiod 2018 to 2024, indicating the expenses incurred in \nrelation to the cameramen and journalists who accompanied \nthe former Prime Minister on each of the official overseas \nmissions undertaken by the latter over the said period? \n \n \n \n \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                     PAGE 29 of 29 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org \n \nQuestions addressed to Honourable Ministers, other than to   \nDr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs \nand External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for \nRodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/24",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 24,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "A/24\nThe Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka \n(Dr Ms Thannoo) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, \nBlue Economy and Fisheries – \n \nWhether, in regard to the development of the industrial hemp \nsector in Mauritius, he will state whether he has taken \ncognizance of previous studies carried out on the potential \nthereof, indicating whether the range of products that may \npotentially be produced from locally grown hemp at \ncompetitive costs, including the production of bioenergy, has \nbeen assessed?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/25",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-21-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-21",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 25,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "A/25\nThe Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka \n(Dr Ms Thannoo) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Gender Equality and Family \nWelfare – \n \nWhether, in regard to the implementation of the Maputo \nProtocol on Women’s Rights, she will state whether an action \nplan has been developed in relation thereto for the  \n(a) safeguarding of the rights of women with disabilities to \nfreedom \nfrom \nviolence, \nincluding \nsexual \nabuse, \ndiscrimination based on disability and the right to be treated \nwith \ndignity \nand \n(b) \nestablishment \nof \nmeasures \ncommensurate with the physical, economic and social needs \nof women to facilitate their access to employment, \nprofessional and vocational training, and participation in \ndecision-making? \n \n \n \nBibi Safeena Lotun, C.S.K. (Mrs)                                          \n Clerk of the National Assembly \n \nParliament House \nPort Louis  \n \n17 April 2026",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/493",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 493,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/493) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to drug trafficking offences, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the number of police officers arrested and/or \nsuspended in connection therewith since 2014 to date, indicating the number thereof \nconvicted and where matters stand regarding the remaining cases.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD – MR S.M., DEPUTY CEO – CONTRACT & \nAPPOINTMENT DETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/494",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 494,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/494) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mr. S. M., Deputy \nChief Executive Officer of the Economic Development Board, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nhis date of appointment and the terms and conditions thereof, and \n(b) \nthe circumstances under which his contract was renewed, indicating the terms and \nconditions of his new contract.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Economic Development \nBoard that Mr S.M. was appointed as Deputy Chief Executive Officer on 11 April 2023 on a \n3-year contract. This post was neither advertised internally nor externally. Mr S.M. was \nhandpicked by the previous Board. The terms and conditions of his appointment were as \nfollows – \n(a) \na basic monthly salary of Rs 400,000 with an annual increase of 3.2%; \n(b) \na gratuity of 20% of the annual basic salary, payable at the end of each year; \n(c) \npassage benefits equivalent to 5% of the annual basic salary, and \n(d) \na chauffeur-driven car. \nI am further informed that at its meeting held on 16 March 2026, the Board of Directors \nof the EDB did not renew the contract, but extended it for a further period of one year, on the \nsame terms and conditions. \nThe decision to extend his contract was taken by the Board of Directors of the EDB \nbecause they felt that since the CEO of the EDB will be leaving by the end of May 2026 to \ntake another appointment abroad, it might be better to extend his contract for a period of one \nyear to ensure continuity at this important economic institution.   \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Beechook! \nMr Beechook: Madam Speaker, will the hon. Prime Minister tell us whether the post \nof Deputy CEO, which is not part of the statutes of the EDB and ought to have been \nadvertised, therefore, will he consider nullifying the renewal of this contract because right \nfrom the beginning… \nMadam Speaker: No, no! No statements! \nMr Beechook: …this post was supposed to be advertised and go through job \ninterviews, etc.? \nThe Prime Minister: As I said, it was not advertised at the time. But it is the Board \nthat decides, not me. They decided because of continuity; to ensure continuity, they extended \nthe contract for one year. Already some months have passed. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, okay.  \nNow, I shall call on the Second Member for Grand Baie & Poudre d'Or, hon. Beejan! \nCYBERCRIME UNIT – CURRENT COMPOSITION – REPORTED CASES – \nCAPACITY STRENGTHENING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/495",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 495,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/495) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the \nCybercrime Unit, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the – \n(a) \ncurrent composition thereof; \n(b) \nnumber of cases reported thereto since November 2025 to date, indicating the \noutcome thereof in each case, and \n(c) \nmeasures being envisaged to strengthen the capacity thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, in regard to part (a) of the question, I am \ninformed by the Commissioner of Police that the Cybercrime Unit is headed by an officer of the \nrank of Assistant Superintendent of Police, who is accountable to the Deputy Commissioner of \nPolice Crime. The Unit is presently staffed with 16 other officers of different ranks, comprising \nanother Assistant Superintendent of Police, one Police Inspector, eight Police Sergeants, and six \nPolice Constables. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, I am informed that for the period 01 November \n2025 to 23 April 2026, a total of 116 cases has been referred to the Cybercrime Unit for \ninvestigation. Out of these, one case has been filed before the court, six cases have led to arrests, \nwith the persons concerned released on bail with conditions, and enquiries in the remaining \ncases are ongoing. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (c) of the question, Government is aware of the \nexisting operational constraints of the Cybercrime Unit and is taking steps to strengthen its \noperational capacity in view of the increasing volume and complexity of cyber-related offences. \nIn this respect –  \n(i) \na more integrated operational framework has been established, whereby the \nCybercrime Unit works in close coordination with the Police IT Unit, which \nprovides 24/7 technical and digital forensic support for investigations; \n(ii) \nthe collaboration has been further enhanced through a Memorandum of \nUnderstanding signed on 28 January 2026 between the Computer Emergency \nResponse Team (CERT-MU), the Mauritius Police Force and the Data \nProtection Office for the operation of a Digital Forensic Laboratory under the \nPolice IT Unit, and \n(iii) \ntraining is being provided to officers through a range of international \norganisations and partner jurisdictions to enhance their expertise in areas, such \nas digital forensics, cyber investigations and emerging cyber threats. \nMadam Speaker, still, I feel there is room for improvement. Therefore, I have asked for \nthe assistance of the Government of India during my State visit in September 2025. \nFollowing the request, the Ministry of Information Technology, Communication and \nInnovation was engaged in discussion with Maharashtra Cyber, a specialised cybercrime \ninvestigation and cybersecurity unit of the Maharashtra Police Force in India, with a view to \nenhancing the operational capacity of the Cybercrime Unit. \nIn November 2025, a delegation from Maharashtra Cyber visited Mauritius, and in \nDecember 2025, a Mauritian delegation led by the hon. Minister of Information Technology, \nCommunication and Innovation visited Mumbai to pursue further discussions with the \nMaharashtra Cyber Police on specific areas of cooperation. \nHowever, after looking at their proposal, I have decided to deal directly with Delhi. \nThese engagements have led to ongoing structured discussions focusing on key strategic \nareas of collaboration, including the establishment of a Command-and-Control Centre as a \ncentralised platform for cybercrime response, the development of enhanced digital forensic \ncapabilities to address complex investigations, and the strengthening of national cybercrime \nresponse mechanisms. \nAlongside these initiatives, and in line with the Government’s Programme of 2025-\n2029, the Ministry of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation is working on \namendments to the Cybersecurity and Cybercrime Act to further reinforce the legal \nframework. \nThese amendments will provide for an enhanced oversight and auditing of critical \ninformation infrastructure as well as stronger safeguards for child online protection. They \nwill also strengthen the obligations of service providers to implement robust cybersecurity \nmeasures, comply with mandatory security standards and audits, report and respond promptly \nto cyber incidents, and cooperate fully with investigators. Drafting instructions have already \nbeen conveyed to the Attorney General’s Office for the preparation of the amendment Bill. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nThe hon. Third Member for Grand Baie & Poudre d'Or! \nMAURITIUS REVENUE AUTHORITY – TAX REVENUE COLLECTION – \nOUTSTANDING AMOUNT (MARCH 2026)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/496",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 496,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/496) Mr R. Etwareea  (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands  whether, in regard to tax \nrevenue collection, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Revenue \nAuthority, information as to the total amount thereof outstanding as at 31 March 2026, giving \na breakdown thereof, indicating the – \n(a) \nreasons therefor, and \n(b) \nmeasures being taken or envisaged to recoup same.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Mauritius Revenue \nAuthority (MRA) that as at 31 March 2026, the total amount of tax revenue outstanding at the \nlevel of the Authority amounted to some Rs 25.7 billion. The breakdown is as follows – \n(a) \nRs14.9 billion under Corporate Income Tax; \n(b) \nRs7.1 billion under Value Added Tax; \n(c) \nRs2.8 billion under Personal Income Tax; \n(d) \nRs352 million under Betting and Gaming Taxes; \n(e) \nRs254 million under Tax Deduction at Source, and \n(f) \nRs249 million under other taxes collected by the MRA. \nIn addition, an amount of Rs615 million was due under the Contribution Sociale \nGénéralisée (CSG), and it has not been paid. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, the main reasons for the accumulation of tax \narrears include – \n(a) \ntaxpayers filing returns without paying the full amount of the tax payable; \n(b) \nunpaid tax on assessments raised by the MRA on taxpayers for under-declaration \nor non-declaration of income; \n(c) \ncases under objections or appeal having been determined, but where the tax due \nhas not been fully paid, and \n(d) \npenalty and interest payable on tax due to the MRA. \nI am further informed, Madam Speaker, that the amount outstanding under corporate \ntax includes the case of Avago Technologies Trading Ltd., where the tax payable is around \nRs 6.6 billion.  This amount has become payable under the determination made by the \nAssessment Review Committee in regard to this case.  However, the taxpayer has \nsubsequently appealed to the Supreme Court without paying the tax due. Recovery actions \nhave been initiated by the MRA and are under dispute at the moment at the Supreme Court. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, the MRA has informed that it has a specialised \nunit, namely the Debt Management Unit, which is responsible for the recovery of arrears.  \nThis Unit uses the various powers conferred to the MRA under the Mauritius Revenue \nAuthority Act to recover tax debts. \nThe most common and effective recovery powers are “attachment orders” on bank \naccounts and inscription of immovable property. Where the bank accounts of a debtor are \nfrozen, the banks are required to remit the money in those accounts to the MRA to clear the \ntax debts. In cases where the debt exceeds Rs200,000, an inscription on immovable properties \nof the debtors is systematically taken. \nMadam Speaker, with a view to speed up the recovery of the amount of tax due, \nGovernment has, in the last Budget, renewed the Tax Arrears Settlement Scheme giving \ntaxpayers a waiver of penalties and interests if the total amount of tax is paid. Additionally, \ntwo new schemes, namely the Tax Dispute Settlement Scheme and the Voluntary Disclosure \nSettlement Scheme were also put in place to improve tax compliance. A total amount of \nRs2.27 billion has been collected under these 3 schemes up to March 2026. \nI am further informed that the MRA is currently working on new ways and means to \nspeed up recovery of tax arrears. In this context, the MRA has already deployed more human \nresources to its Debt Management Unit. The MRA is also coming up with additional \nmechanism with a view to accelerating the recovery of outstanding amounts. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Etwareea, fine? Okay. \nNow, we have the hon. First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart! \nDETAINEES – PROHIBITED ITEMS POSSESSION – REPORTED CASES (2023-\n2026)",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/497",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 497,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/497) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to \nprohibited items found in the possession of detainees within correctional facilities after \nattending court, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number of \nreported cases thereof over the past three years, indicating the number thereof – \n(a) \ninvestigated and dealt with, and  \n(b) \nin respect of which charges have been lodged against the detainees and any other \nperson.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Prisons \nthat all detainees are systematically searched upon their return from Court.  From 01 January \n2023 to 23 April 2026, 48 cases have been reported where prohibited items were found to be \nin the possession of detainees returning from Court. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, out of the 48 cases, 35 cases concerning \nprohibited items such as dangerous drugs, mobile phones, or SIM cards have been reported to \nthe Police for investigation as they are suspected to be linked to criminal offences. \nAs regards the remaining 13 cases, involving prohibited items such as cigarettes, \nlighters and flintstones, disciplinary actions have been taken against the detainees at the level \nof the Prisons Department. Such actions relate to confinement in a separate cell, forfeiture of \nprivileges or earnings and loss of remission. \nMadam Speaker, in regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed by the \nCommissioner of Police that out of the 35 reported cases, three cases have been filed and one \ndetainee has been charged with the offence of Possession of Heroin with aggravating \ncircumstances under sections 34 and 41 of the Dangerous Drugs Act.  Police enquiry is \nongoing in the remaining cases. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, Dr. Prayag, are you okay? \nNow, we have the hon. Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis Central! \n \nPUBLIC BODIES – ALLEGED CORRUPTIVE PRACTICES – INQUIRIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/498",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 498,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/498) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to alleged corruptive practices in Ministries, State-owned enterprises and parastatal \nbodies, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Financial Crimes Commission, \ninformation as to the number of reported cases thereof as at to date, indicating the number \nthereof – \n(a) \ncurrently under investigation, and  \n(b) \nwherein inquiries have been completed, prosecution initiated and convictions \nsecured or awaiting determination.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Financial Crimes \nCommission that since the establishment of the Financial Crimes Commission in March \n2024, 327 cases of alleged corruptive practices in Ministries, State-owned Enterprises and \nParastatal Bodies have been reported to the Commission. The House may wish to note that \nthe Financial Crimes Commission also took over 136 cases of alleged corruptive practices \nfrom the defunct Independent Commission Against Corruption. \nIn regard to part (a) of the question, the Financial Crimes Commission has informed \nthat 204 cases are currently under investigation. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, the Commission has informed that inquiries have \nbeen completed in 11 cases, out of which – \n(i) \nfour cases have been referred to the Office of the DPP, and \n(ii) \nseven cases have been lodged before the Intermediate court. \nIn addition, convictions have been secured in four cases, out of which, determination is \nawaited in two cases. \nIt is also to be noted, Madam Speaker, that during the course of investigation, 248 cases \nwere set aside as the Financial Crimes Commission determined that they do not fall within \nthe purview of the Commission. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, one question! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Prime Minister whether \nhe has any information from the Financial Crimes Commission as to if foreign forensic \nauditors will be required or have recourse to in an attempt to speed up investigations for \nwhich the general public is awaiting to see that those who squandered the coffers of the State \nduring 2014 to 2024 are taken care of? \nThe Prime Minister: We are having recourse to former members of Scotland Yard to \nhelp the Police and the Financial Crimes Commission on this. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nTELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERCEPTION – COMBATTING CRIMES – \nLEGISLATION SAFEGUARD",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/499",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 499,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/499) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the interception of telecommunications, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to whether same is being resorted to combat crimes and, if so, indicate \nwhether consideration is being given for the introduction of legislation to safeguard against \nthe misuse, abuse or illegal use thereof, including the setting up of an independent oversight \nbody therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMR A.C.P. & TWIN BROTHER’S ARRESTS – REASONS/CIRCUMSTANCES & \nDEPARTURE OBJECTIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/500",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 500,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/500) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mr \nA.C.P. arrested on or about 03 April 2026 and the subsequent arrest of his twin brother, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe reasons therefor and circumstances thereof, indicating the items seized in the \ncourse thereof and whether same include illicit drugs and, if so, give details \nthereof, and  \n(b) \nwhether they are currently subjected to objections to departure.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMadam Speaker: Yes, next question! Hon. Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles, \nDr. Ms Daureeawo! \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Thank you, Madam Speaker. B/502! \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Oh, I missed Mr Beechook. I am so sorry! \nOkay, hon. Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil!  \nBear with me, Miss! \nSAINT LOUIS POWER PLANT – TURBINES PROCUREMENT – ALLEGED \nCORRUPTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/501",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 501,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/501) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the inquiry \ninitiated into allegations of corruption in relation to the procurement of turbines for the Saint \nLouis Power Plant of the Central Electricity Board, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain information as to where matters stand, indicating the names of the persons arrested and \ninterrogated under caution in connection therewith as at to date.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Financial Crimes \nCommission that the then Independent Commission Against Corruption initiated \ninvestigations on the procurement of turbines at a contract value of Rs4.2 billion for the \nRedevelopment of the Saint Louis Power Station in June 2020 based on three sources, \nnamely – \n(i) \na local press article dated 09 June 2020; \n(ii) \na referral from the Central Electricity Board, and \n(iii) a press release from the African Development Bank denouncing an alleged act of \ncorruption in the award of the tender for the Redevelopment of Saint Louis Power \nStation Project by the Central Electricity Board to (BWSC), Denmark in March \nof 2016. \nMadam Speaker, the Commission has further informed that investigation has been \ncompleted and the matter has been transmitted to the Office of the Director of Public \nProsecutions on 29 January 2026. \nMadam Speaker, regarding the names of the people arrested, these cannot be disclosed \nas the matter has been referred to the Director of Public Prosecutions for further action. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.  \nYes, now it is your turn! \nHUMAN TRAFFICKING – REPORTED CASES – VICTIMS PROTECTION \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/502",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 502,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/502) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to human trafficking, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to the – \n(a) \nnumber of reported cases thereof over the past two years, indicating the number \nof prosecutions initiated in connection therewith and the outcomes thereof, and  \n(b) \nadditional measures taken or being envisaged to combat same, indicating the \nmechanisms put in place for the protection of the victims thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat, for the period 01 January 2024 to 24 April 2026, a total of 26 cases of human trafficking \nhave been reported. Out of these, prosecution has been initiated in four cases, of which three \nare currently under trial and one has resulted in conviction. The remaining cases are still \nunder enquiry. \nWith the increasing number of foreign workers in the country, the scourge of human \ntrafficking presents a growing challenge which Government is addressing through \nstrengthened enforcement coupled with enhanced legal and institutional framework as well as \npreventive measures. At policy level, the National Action Plan 2022-2026 for combatting \nhuman trafficking is being reviewed with the collaboration of the International Organisation \nfor Migration (IOM) and amendments have been brought to the Combatting of Trafficking in \nPersons (TIP) Act to apply tougher penalties for perpetrators and enlarge the powers of \ninvestigation of the Police. Some of the key operational measures already in place to combat \nhuman trafficking are as follows – \n(i) \nvigilance is maintained at the airport and the harbour by the Passport and \nImmigration Office through vigorous screening.  Around 5,330 passengers have \nbeen refused entry in Mauritius over the past two years for non-compliance of \nentry procedures and suspected irregular or unlawful intent; \n(ii) \ncontinuous crackdown operations are carried out by the Passport and Immigration \nOffice Tracking Team to search for illegal/missing foreigners to prevent them to \nbecome the prey of traffickers. Since 01 January 2026, around 272 cracks down \noperations have been carried out and 2,138 foreigners have been arrested for \nillegal stay; \n(iii) reinforced coordination with key stakeholders, including the Ministry of Labour \nand Industrial Relations, the TIP Task Force of Office of the Director of Public \nProsecutions, the TIP Unit of the Police and the Passport and Immigration Office \nfor detection of cases of human trafficking as well as for sensitisation campaigns \non the risk and indicators of human trafficking, and \n(iv) strengthening training and capacity-building of Police Officers, including \ndedicated modules in recruit courses, to enhance detection, investigation and \nprosecution of trafficking cases. Police Officers also benefit from international \ntraining courses from the United States Department of State and the IOM on \nHuman Trafficking. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to protection of victims, I am informed that \ncomprehensive mechanisms have been put in place to ensure their safety, care and \nrehabilitation. These include the provision of shelter facilities for both male and female \nvictims, access to medical and psychological support, legal assistance and arrangements for \neducation of minors in cases where victims are accompanied with their children. Victims are \nalso provided with international communication facilities and, where appropriate, are safely \nrepatriated to their country of origin. \nA victim-centred standard operating procedure has been implemented with the \ncollaboration of the IOM and key stakeholders have been trained for the referral of cases of \nhuman trafficking as well as support to the victims.  \nFurthermore, close collaboration is maintained with NGOs operating shelters, with \ndedicated Police liaison officers, regular monitoring, and necessary protection measures to \nensure that victims are safeguarded and that there is no contact with alleged perpetrators. \nCases of human trafficking are often complex in nature and require careful handling of \nvictims to enable them to depone effectively before Court, which is the key to securing \nconvictions. The Government remains fully committed to protecting victims and has put solid \nsystems in place to combat this phenomenon. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, you are alright? Very good! Now, the hon. First \nMember for Savanne & Black River. \nINTERNATIONAL AIR TRAVEL ROUTES – MIDDLE EAST CRISIS IMPACT – \nSTRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/503",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 503,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/503) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to international air \ntravel routes, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from Airports of Mauritius Ltd., \ninformation as to – \n(a) \nthe impact of the Middle East crisis on the flights operated between Mauritius and \nAsia, in particular China, and  \n(b) \nwhether consideration will be given for positioning Mauritius as an air corridor \nbetween Asia and Africa and seeking a strategic partnership for Air Mauritius Ltd. \nwith an airline from the Middle East.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I wish to draw the attention of the House that \ninformation regarding this question have been obtained from the Department of Civil \nAviation as the regulator and Air Mauritius Ltd.  \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the House that currently, three \nairlines, namely Air Mauritius, Air India, and Indigo, operate on the Mauritius-Asia route. \nThe destinations are: New Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru, Chennai in India and also Kuala \nLumpur in Malaysia. In addition, Air India and Malaysia Airlines have codeshare agreement \nwith Air Mauritius, connecting Mauritius with Asia. \nAs regards China, I am informed that China Southern Airlines and Air Mauritius were \noperating direct flights on the Mauritius-China route. China Southern Airlines ceased \noperations on 28 November 2015 whereas Air Mauritius continued till 31 January 2020. \nThere is presently no direct flight between Mauritius and China, although I believe that China \nSouthern Airlines are discussing with Air Mauritius and Civil Aviation to restart the route. \nI am informed by the Department of Civil Aviation that, so far, the Middle East crisis \nhas not affected the operation of scheduled flights between Mauritius and Asia by Air \nMauritius, Air India and Indigo.  \nHowever, the crisis has led to a significant increase in Jet-A1 fuel prices throughout the \nworld and this has affected the costs of operation of Air Mauritius as well as the prices of air \ntickets. A Committee has been set up by Air Mauritius to explore all the opportunities to \nmitigate the impact of rising Jet-A1 fuel costs. Air Mauritius is closely monitoring the \nsituation and will take appropriate action as circumstances would warrant.  \nConcerning part (b) of the question, Madam Speaker, according to Air Mauritius, the \nconcept of ‘air corridor’ between Asia and Africa via Mauritius was implemented with effect \nfrom 11 March 2016. However, this concept was terminated in 2017 as there were several \nstructural flaws which eventually led to the operations running at a loss. There is no plan to \nre-establish such a corridor for the time being. \nAir Mauritius has enlisted the services of a consulting firm to conduct a network and \nfleet review.  \nCurrently, Air Mauritius is embarking on a set of game changing strategies aimed not \nonly at improving the performance of the company but also to build resilience in the face of \nemerging challenges.  \nAir Mauritius is not immediately envisaging a strategic partnership with any airline at \nthis stage but they are looking at it. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, you are okay? Right! Again, the hon. Second Member for Flacq \n& Bon Accueil – very popular today. \nSPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE – PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT – INCENTIVE \nPACKAGE – FINANCIAL COST & BENEFITS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/504",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 504,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/504) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the proposed \nestablishment of a Special Economic Zone at Côte d’Or, he will state the – \n(a) \nproposed incentive package for prospective promoters, developers and operators \nthereof; \n(b) \nestimated financial cost thereof to Government, and  \n(c) \nanticipated tangible benefits for the Mauritian economy in terms of foreign direct \ninvestment and job creation.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, at the launch of the Mauritius-India Business \nMeeting last September in Mumbai, I had announced the setting up of a Special Economic \nZone in Mauritius. This SEZ would have world class facilities for excellence in IT, Artificial \nIntelligence, high tech manufacturing, and other transformative investment.  \nThe SEZ at Côte d'Or, being developed on 83 arpents of land, will be a premier \ninnovation-driven zone for businesses that define the economy of the future.  \nThe setting up of the SEZ is part of our strategy for economic renewal and transition to \na new economic model, which is investment-driven. Through this zone, Government is laying \nthe foundation for a new pillar which will promote a technology-driven economy.  \nDuring my visit to India in February 2026, at the India AI Impact Summit 2026, I \nappealed to the business community to avail of the facilities under the SEZ to make Mauritius \na trusted digital gateway between Africa and Asia.  \nA Steering Committee has been set up to oversee implementation of the SEZ and to \nensure that the necessary ecosystem is put in place to attract high-net-worth investors. This \nCommittee is chaired by the Financial Secretary and comprises representatives of the relevant \nMinistries and institutions. It is working on all the aspects of the SEZ implementation, \nincluding the development of an incentive framework for the zone. \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, the Steering Committee has \nrecommended a package of incentives to attract investors in the SEZ.  The proposed package \nwill be offered under a new scheme. The scheme will also be available for the development \nof similar approved zones across the country.  The package covers both fiscal and non-fiscal \nincentives and has been developed based on a benchmarking exercise of incentives being \noffered by other similar SEZs across the world.  The holders of the proposed Golden Visa \nwill be able to participate in the new scheme and benefit from the package of incentives.  \nOnce approved by Cabinet, the details of the incentive package will be made public. \nMadam Speaker, we are ensuring that the package of incentives will be comprehensive \nenough to cater for the needs of different categories of investors in the zone.  \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, the SEZ at Côte d'Or will be fully serviced with \ninfrastructure which include roads, electricity and water as well as wastewater by December \nof this year.  \nThis will require an investment of around Rs1 billion, out of which, Government is \nfinancing some Rs882 million.  The remaining investment will be made by Landscope \n(Mauritius) Ltd. \nWith regard to part (c) of the question, the SEZ will be a transformative, game-\nchanging opportunity that will drive the next wave of investment in Mauritius and strengthen \nthe country’s global economic positioning. It will also provide the opportunity to position \nMauritius as a safe and stable investment jurisdiction in the midst of the pervading \nuncertainties at the international level. \nIt will support economic diversification, enabling Mauritius to transition into a hub for \nAI, advanced technology and manufacturing. International experience shows that Special \nEconomic Zones are proven catalysts for FDI, for job creation, and economic growth. Being \nthe first AI-focused SEZ in the region, Mauritius is well-positioned to emerge as a leader in \nAI innovation and data-driven economy. \nThis will enable a structural shift from traditional sectors to knowledge-based and \ninnovation-driven industries, enhancing global competitiveness. The SEZ aims to attract \nleading global technology companies and AI-Data and Disaster Recovery Centres, \npositioning Mauritius as a producer and exporter of AI services and not just being a \nconsumer.  \nIn terms of employment, the SEZ is expected to generate high-value jobs in targeted \nsectors. \nAt this point, Madam Speaker, we are in the process of launching an Expression of \nInterest inviting investors to invest in the SEZ. We will be in a better position to assess the \nlevel of Foreign Direct Investment and the impact on job creation from the SEZ after this \nexercise.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, thank you. The hon. First Member for Vacoas & Floréal! \nBANK OF MAURITIUS – FOREIGN CURRENCY RESERVES –QUANTUM SOLD",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/505",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 505,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floreal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/505) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floreal) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the country’s foreign \ncurrency reserves, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Bank of Mauritius, \ninformation as to the quantum of foreign currency sold on the domestic market over the past \ntwo years, on a yearly basis, indicating the sources thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, with your permission, I will reply to \nParliamentary Questions B/505 and B/511 together, as they relate to the same subject matter. \nAs I have previously stated in this august Assembly, this Government and the new \nadministration at the Bank of Mauritius have implemented a series of measures to rectify the \nchaotic situation that prevailed in the domestic foreign exchange market prior to November \n2024. A pronounced mismatch between demand and supply has led to substantial shortages of \nforeign currency on the local market. \nLet me remind the House of some of the key measures taken – \n(a) \nThe repo rate was raised by 50 basis points to 4.5 percent per annum in February \n2025; \n(b) \nInstructions were given to commercial banks to ensure that all dealings in foreign \nexchange, including swaps and other derivatives, are effected through financial \ninstitutions duly licensed by the Bank; \n(c) \nThe Bank enforced stricter regulation on intercompany transactions in foreign \ncurrencies as well as swaps and other derivatives; \n(d) \nBanks were instructed to ensure that forward transactions are priced in a fair \nmanner and in accordance with market fundamentals, and \n(e) \nThe regulatory arbitrage between the Financial Services Commission and the \nBank of Mauritius regarding the purchase and sale of forex by Treasury \nManagement Companies was discontinued.    \nAt the level of Government, Madam Speaker, we have reinforced these efforts through \nstructural measures aimed at increasing foreign currency inflows.  These including – \n(a) \nrequiring that at least 85 percent of proceeds from the sales of villas under the \nProperty Development Scheme be converted into rupees, and \n(b) \nmandating that the businesses earning at least 50 percent of their turnover in \nforeign currency pay their tax in full in foreign currency. \nIn addition, the introduction of the Tourist Fee of 3 Euros per night per tourist, effective \nas 01 October 2025, has helped to ease the foreign exchange shortage. \nAs a result of these measures, Madam Speaker, I am informed by the Bank of Mauritius \nthat conditions in the domestic foreign exchange rate have improved. In 2025, both purchases \nand sales of foreign currency by banks and foreign exchange dealers reached historically high \nlevels, reflecting increased market activity and a notable easing of liquidity constraints in the \nforex market. \nA similar positive momentum has been observed since the start of this year.  \nTransactions in foreign currency by banks and foreign exchange dealers have increased by \naround 11 percent from the beginning of the year up to 22 April 2026. This reflects a \ncontinued strengthening of activity and confidence in the foreign exchange market. \nAs market conditions have improved, the Bank of Mauritius has had to intervene to a \nlesser extent in the foreign exchange market in 2025. The Bank sold USD 224 million on the \nforex market during the year, compared to USD 372.3 million in 2024. \nThis reduction in the volume of sales reflects the gradual easing of pressures in the \nmarket. The trend has continued into 2026, with the Bank selling USD 40 million on the \ndomestic market from January to 23 April 2026. \nI am further informed by the Bank of Mauritius that the sales of US dollars on the \nmarket were sourced from official foreign currency reserves at the Bank of Mauritius. \nThe situation, Madam Speaker, is improving, especially in view of the overall surplus \nin the balance of payments. The combined effect of raising the key rate, enhancing regulation, \ntargeted interventions, and structural measures has led to better liquidity conditions and \nincreased supply of foreign exchange. \nThe Bank of Mauritius is continuously monitoring developments in the market and is \nhaving monthly meetings with the treasurers of banks through the Mauritius Financial \nMarkets Committee. The Bank stands ready to take appropriate actions as may be required to \nensure an adequate and orderly supply of foreign currency. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, one question because time is up! \nMs J. Bérenger: Est-ce qu’il pourrait nous donner plus de détails sur la provenance des \ndevises des réserves ? \nThe Prime Minister: I don’t have all the details of the provenance from the Bank of \nMauritius, but I can look into the matter. But I know, as I said, some measures are being \ntaken. For example, on property, they have to pay now in rupees. This is increasing. Also, the \nthree euros for the tourists, this also is coming to the foreign reserve. \nMadam Speaker: Okay! Time is up now! Time is up! \nI have to inform you that B/514 has been withdrawn. \nSo, now we go to questions to Ministers! \nThe hon. Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil, Mr Ramkalawon! \nSECONDARY SCHOOLS – SYNTHETIC DRUGS – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/506",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 506,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/506) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the post of Director of Supervision at the Bank of Mauritius, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain information as to the – \n(a) \nrole and responsibilities assigned thereto, and \n(b) \nnames of the incumbents for the period 2014 to 2024.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nAIR MAURITIUS LTD – STRATEGIC PARTNER – SHORTLISTED PARTNERS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/507",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 507,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/507) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Air Mauritius Ltd., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from Airport \nHoldings Ltd., information as to whether the latter is seeking a strategic partner therefor and, \nif so, where matters stand, indicating the names of any shortlisted partners.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIUS PRISON SERVICE – DRUG & MONEY LAUNDERING OFFENCES – \nINTERDICTED OFFICERS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/508",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 508,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/508) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to drug-related and/or money laundering offences within the Mauritius Prison Service, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Prisons, information as \nto the number of officers having been, over the period November 2024 to date – \n(a) \ninterdicted from duty, indicating their respective ranks and dates of interdiction; \n(b) \ndismissed from the service; \n(c) \nprovisionally or formally charged therefor, and \n(d) \nfound guilty thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBANK OF MAURITIUS – FOREIGN EXCHANGE SHORTAGE – REMEDIAL \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/509",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 509,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "B/509\nThe Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart \n(Dr Prayag) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,   \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –   \n \nWhether, in regard to the tourist fee of 3 euros per person per \nnight, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nMauritius Revenue Authority, information as to (a) the total \nrevenue \ncollected \nsince \nthe \nimplementation \nthereof  \n(b) the mechanism in place to ensure compliance and \ncollection and (c) whether an assessment has been conducted \nas to possible non-compliance therewith and, if so, indicate \nthe outcome thereof? \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                   PAGE 7 of 24 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/510",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 510,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "B/510\nThe Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart \n(Dr Prayag) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,   \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –   \n \nWhether, in regard to the Police Officers, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, \ninformation as to the number thereof promoted over the \nperiod 2021 to 2024, indicating (a) the criteria applied \ntherefor and (b) whether the promotion practices applied \nhave been assessed to be compliant with the principles \ncontained in the Equal Opportunities Act and, if so, indicate \nthe outcome thereof?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/511",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 511,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/511) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d'Or) \nasked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to foreign \nexchange, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Bank of Mauritius, \ninformation as to whether there is a shortage thereof on the local market and, if so, indicate \nthe extent and impact thereof and the measures/strategy being envisaged to address same.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/505) \nGAMBLING REGULATORY AUTHORITY – BOOKMAKERS’ LICENCES – \nNUMBER",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/512",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 512,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "B/512\nThe Honourable Third Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or \n(Mr Etwareea) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,   \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –   \n \nWhether, in regard to the proposed introduction of the \nGolden Visa Scheme, he will (a) for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Economic Development Board, information \nas to (i) whether the potential success and risks thereof \nparticularly, regarding compliance with the Financial Action \nTask Force standards and (ii) the estimated yearly number of \nResidence Permits to be issued thereunder, have been \nassessed and (b) state whether same will represent an \naccelerated pathway to permanent residence or Mauritian \ncitizenship? \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                   PAGE 8 of 24 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/513",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 513,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "B/513\nThe Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,   \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –   \n \nWhether, in regard to the claim made by the Republic of \nMauritius under the United Nations Convention on the Law of \nthe Sea for an extension of its continental shelf of 183,000 km² \nin the vicinity of Rodrigues Island, he will state where matters \nstand?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/514",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 514,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/514) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, \nMinister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to \nbookmakers licences, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Gambling \nRegulatory Authority, information as to the number thereof issued since 2025 to date to – \n(a) \nindividuals, and \n(b) \ncompanies, indicating in each case whether the licence granted is for operation \ninside or outside the race course.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCOVID-19 PROJECTS DEVELOPMENT FUND – RS 3 BILLION – SILVER \nBANK DEPOSIT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/515",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 515,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/515) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked  the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the then COVID-19 Projects Development Fund, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to who authorised the deposit of  Rs 3 billion thereof into the \nSilver Bank in 2023, indicating whether the selection of the said bank was made pursuant to a \nbidding exercise.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nELECTORAL REFORMS PROPOSALS – PUBLIC CONSULTATION & REVIEW \nPROCESS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/516",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 516,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "B/516\nThe Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,   \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –   \n \nWhether, in regard to the escalating tensions in the Middle \nEast, he will state the measures being envisaged to safeguard \nthe Outer Islands, namely, Rodrigues Island and Agalega, \nparticularly in respect of the allocation of resources and the \ncontinuity \nof \nessential \nsupplies, \nindicating \nwhether \nrepresentatives from Rodrigues and Agalega have been \nconsulted or included in the national decision-making \nprocesses and crisis-response frameworks?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/517",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 517,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/517) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the public consultation exercise in respect of the proposed Electoral Reforms, he \nwill state the number of proposals received as at closing date, indicating – \n(a) \nwhether a special team or committee has been set up to consider same, and \n(b) \nthe timeframe for the preparation of a summary of the main proposals and \nwhether same will be circulated prior to the drafting of any new legislation in \nrelation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nALALILA PLATFORM – REGULATORYAPPROVAL & TAXI OPERATORS’ \nREPRESENTATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/518",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 518,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/518) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked \nthe Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the secondary schools, \nhe will state the number of reported cases of introduction, possession and consumption of \nsynthetic drugs thereat over the past ten years, indicating the measures being taken to prevent \nthe recurrence thereof.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, I wish to thank the hon. Member for this question \nwhich is of national importance. Let us be clear when we speak of synthetic drugs in our \nschools, we are not discussing mere statistics. We are discussing of a genuine predatory threat \nwhich spares almost no one, be it the children or adults.  \nBased on the records on my Ministry between 2016 and March 2026, we have \nidentified 80 suspected cases across our state and private secondary schools. Each of these \ncases was immediately handed over to the police authorities for rigorous investigation as per \nthe established protocol guiding heads of schools.  \nMadam Speaker, one single case is an outrage. One single case is a call to arms. My \nMinistry does not merely remain concerned; we are engaged in an unrelenting offensive to \npurge this scourge from our school premises and the corridors of learning.  \nOur strategy is built on a three-pronged shield to protect our children – \n(1) \nfearless prevention; \n(2) \nuncompromising deterrence, and \n(3) \ncompassionate support. \nMadam Speaker, regarding prevention, we are sensitising our children through two \nspecific school programmes, namely – \n• \nthe Get Connected Programme, and  \n• \nthe Rebound Programme. \nThe Get Connected Programme targets our Grade 7 and Grade 8 students. This \ninitiative builds a foundation of emotional regulation and responsible decision-making. We \nare strengthening the protective factors of our children before they are ever approached by a \ndealer. \nThe Rebound Programme targets our Grade 10 students. We are deploying an \ninteractive media driven curriculum designed to dismantle the myths of drug culture. It turns \npeer pressure into peer leadership. \nDeterrence – the safety of our school does not stop at the perimeter fence. In a high-\nlevel collaboration with the Anti-Drug Smuggling Unit and the Crime Prevention Unit, we \nhave intensified patrols and crackdown operations. \nPsychosocial support – we recognise that substance abuse is often a cry for help \nthrough the National Educational Counselling Service. We have shifted from a reactive to a \npro-active model. We are identifying at-risk students through early behavioural markers, \nensuring that intervention happens in the counsellor’s office, and proper counselling exercise \ntakes place with a view to protecting our children. \nMadam Speaker, along with the above preventive measures, we are also investing in \ncapacity building. For instance, the school project entitled ‘School Training Capacity \nBuilding of Ministry of Education and Human Resources’ is being implemented jointly by \nthe National Agency for Drug Control (NADC) and the Ministry of Education and Human \nResource with the objective of strengthening leadership and professional competencies within \nthe school system. The target audience includes Rectors, Deputy Rectors, Educators, \nEducational Psychologists, Social Workers, Head Masters as well as the PTA members. The \nimplementation period of the project extends from 13 March 2026 to September 2026.  \nMadam Speaker, the expected outcomes are – \n(1) \nImprove leadership capacity among school leaders to foster safe, inclusive and \nsupportive learning environment with a focus on student’s well-being and the \nprevention of risk behaviours; \n(2) \nEnhance ability of schools to implement evidence-based prevention strategies, \npromote a positive school culture and active engaged educators, students and \nparents in sustained school development efforts. \nMadam Speaker, a school should be a sanctuary; a place of light for learning and \ngrowth. We cannot win this fight alone. This requires a whole of society’s mobilisation. We \nneed parents to be vigilant, communities to be vocal and enforcement to be ruthless and \nvisible. This Government will not flinch. We will not relent, and we will certainly never be \ncomplacent. We are reinforcing our sensitisation campaigns, revamping our detection system \nand expanding our support networks because the protection of our children is a non-\nnegotiable priority. Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Mr Ramkalawon! \nMr Ramkalawon: Madam Speaker, may I ask the hon. Minister to reactivate the \nBrigade des Mineurs which had a major role in combating substance abuse in schools? \nMadam Speaker: Ça ne relève pas de lui. Ça relève du ministère des Genres. \nDr. Gungapersad: Madam Speaker, I wish to inform the hon. Member that we are \nactually working under the chairmanship of the Attorney General on what we call children in \nconflict with law. In that committee, we are going to bring those suggestions and see what \nwould be the way forward. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. Yes, Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister whether his \nMinistry has noted if there is any relationship between the consumption of synthetic drugs in \nthose secondary schools and the possession of offensive weapon, as has been depicted \nrecently? \nDr. Gungapersad: I thank the hon. Member. Definitely, we are going to look into that \nmatter. Perhaps we do not have evidence-based data as at now. Definitely this is going to be \nan area that we need to ponder on, we need to carry out investigation on that in order to have \nreliable data, in order to take informed decisions in the future. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Hon. Dr. Aumeer, it is your question now. \nLAW PRACTITIONERS COMPLAINTS COMMISSION – COMPOSITION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/519",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 519,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/519) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Attorney-General whether, in regard to the Law Practitioners Complaints \nCommission, he will state the composition thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Glover: Madam Speaker, section 5(1) of the Law Practitioners (Disciplinary \nProceedings) Act 2025 provides that the Law Practitioners Complaints Commission shall \nconsist of a Chairperson, two Vice-chairpersons and 9 other members. Section 5(3)(a) of the \nAct further provides there shall be an Appointment Committee that shall decide on the \nnomination of the chairperson, vice-chairpersons of the Complaints Commission. \nThe Appointment Committee composed of myself as Attorney General, Mr Antoine \nDomingue, Senior Counsel as Chairperson of the Bar, Mr Dave Boolauky, President of the \nLaw Society, and Mr Patrice Avrillon, Chairperson of the Chamber of Notaries, has decided \nto nominate former Chief Justice Marc France Eddy Balancy, GOSK, as Chairperson and \nformer judge, Jacques Benjamin Gerard Marie Joseph, and Mr Kritananda Naghee Reddy, \nformer Assistant Solicitor General at the Attorney General’s Office as Vice-chairpersons of \nthe Complaints Commission. \nSection 3(b) of the Act further provides that where the Chairperson and Vice-\nchairpersons are nominated by that Appointment Committee, the Attorney General shall \nappoint them. The above names have been contacted and are agreeable to… \nMadam Speaker: Serve as. \nMr Glover: Serve as members of that Commission. The nine other members of the \nComplaints Commission who have been nominated by their respective associations are as \nfollows – \nFor the Bar – \n• \nMr Yusuf Hassam Aboobaker – Senior Counsel; \n• \nMr Subhas Chandra Lallah – Senior counsel, and \n• \nMrs Varuna Roy Bunwaree. \nFor the Chamber of Notaries – \n• \nMr Patrice Avrillon; \n• \nMrs Bibi Swaleka Jagan, and \n• \nMrs Koonavathi Gooriah, and \nFor the Law Society – \n• \nMr Bebakur Rampoortab – Senior Attorney; \n• \nMrs Ayesha Jeewa – Senior Attorney, and  \n• \nMr Navin Rama. \nHowever, Madam Speaker, the Chairperson and the Vice-chairpersons have not as yet \nbeen appointed by myself as there are some other issues that need to be finalised before the \nComplaints Commission becomes fully operational.  \nAs the House know, under section 7(2) of the Act, there is provision that there shall be a \nSecretary to the Complaints Commission who shall be a public officer. I wish to inform the \nHouse that I have liaised with the hon. Chief Justice so that a Senior Court Officer be \nappointed as the Secretary of the Complaints Commission. The Chief Justice has agreed in \nprinciple to the suggestion and we have already earmarked the person that will be soon \nappointed.  \nIn addition, that same section 7 of the Act provides other public officers who will have \nto be designated to assist the Complaints Commission in the discharge of its functions and \nexercise of its powers under the Act. These persons are yet to be appointed and I expect that \nthese people will be appointed as and when the Chairperson and the Vice-chairpersons will be \nappointed. \nFurthermore, I have been on the lookout for appropriate premises to house the \nComplaints Commission. Several buildings have been earmarked and were visited. I wish to \ninform the House, the building at Caudan, where the Mauritius International Arbitration \nCentre (MIAC) is housed, has been identified to locate the Complaints Commission. I have \npersonally visited the premises and met with the management of MIAC and I have obtained \ntheir verbal agreement subject to a formal agreement being finalised. Once these \nadministrative issues have been sorted out, I will make the necessary appointments for the \nChairperson and Vice-chairpersons of the Complaints Commission. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, one question. \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Madam Speaker. A very simple question. Hon. Attorney \nGeneral when do you expect that the Law Complaints Commission will be operational given \nthat there was a 30-day mandatory period between the day of enactment of the law and its \nstart of operation. Thank you. \nMr Glover: The hon. Member is right, the law came into operation earlier in January \nand we are absolutely late but administrative matters are, unfortunately, the order of the day \nin this Government and we are trying by all means to try and beat the deadline, we could not \ndo it but I hope that within four weeks, the Complaints Commission will be up and running. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you, hon. Attorney General. Next question hon. Fourth \nMember for Rodrigues. Yes. \nMAURITIUS POST LTD – FINANCIAL SITUATION – IMPACT ON \nEMPLOYEES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/520",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 520,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/520) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nInformation Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in regard to the current \nfinancial situation of the Mauritius Post Ltd., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to the impact thereof on the employees, indicating the measures being \nenvisaged to address same. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: Madam Speaker, I wish to thank the hon. Member for this question and \nwith your permission I wish to recall my responses to PQs B/424, B/515 and B/434 where I \nreferred to the financial situation of Mauritius Post Ltd. \nMadam Speaker, the MPL is indeed facing serious financial difficulties and cash flow \npressures and I am informed by MPL that for the year ending 30 June 2025, it recorded an \noperating loss of Rs282 million. At the same time, shareholders deficit stood at Rs1.7 billion \nwhile the pension liability amounted to Rs2.6 billion. \nMoreover, the company has fully utilised its overdraft facility of Rs177 million to \nsupport its day-to-day operations. Additionally, it has encashed a fixed deposit of Rs200 \nmillion to meet its financial obligations amongst others. This situation is already impacting \nemployees both in Mauritius and in Rodrigues. It is public knowledge that payment of sick \nleave benefits dues in February 2026 was actually postponed to March 2026 which was \neventually paid three days later than scheduled. \nMadam Speaker, in order to address this situation, Mauritius Post is implementing in a \nphase manner a series of short and medium-term strategic measures both in Mauritius and in \nRodrigues aimed at stabilising the organisation and improving its cash flow position.  \nIn terms of human resources management, emphasis is being laid on improving \nproductivity and efficiency through internal reorganisation, capacity building and \nredeployment where necessary both in Mauritius and in Rodrigues. \nAt the operational level, revenue enhancing measures have been introduced including \nan increase in postal tariffs, the revision of rates for postal services and a review of \ncommissions charged to organisations. At the same time, the cost optimisation initiatives are \nbeing pursued such as a freeze on recruitment and promotions and tighter control over \novertime payments. \nFurthermore, the company is accelerating the development of its e-commerce and \nparcel related services through partnerships with international entities. Additional initiatives \ninclude the expansion of digital and advertising services, the rental of unused space in post \noffices, increased digitalisation of customer interfaces and a review of operational processes \nto enhance efficiency and service delivery. \nIn conclusion, in the medium to long term, the company is also envisaging structural \nreforms through strategic partnerships and the exploration of new markets with a view to \ndiversifying its activities and ensuring its sustainability in an increasingly digitally and \ncompetitive environment. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes. Yes, one question. \nMr Edouard: Thank you. May I ask the hon. Minister what is being done to address \ndelays in the payment of salaries? \nDr. Ramtohul: Indeed, there was a delay in the payment of salaries one time, it was a \none-off event. We do not expect to have further such events recurring. However, all the \nmeasures that I have mentioned in my response are collectively contributing to ensure that \nsuch events do not recur. We are all very well aware that all post offices across the globe are \nundergoing serious challenges and Mauritius is no exception and we face the same situation. \nWe actually deplore the omission of the previous government in terms of relooking at \nwhat Mauritius Post Office could have done back then – things that were not done. This is \nwhy today, this Government is having to pay back for the omissions of the previous \ngovernment and this is very, very sad for the employees of the Mauritius Post. Really sad. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, hon. Edouard, you are alright? Hon. François! \nMr François: Thank you, Madam Speaker. On behalf of the employees in Rodrigues, a \nbasic question to reassure them. May I ask the hon. Minister whether those who are to retire \nsoon are still eligible for their lump sum, pension scheme and other retirement benefits \nentitlements? \nDr. Ramtohul: Thank you for this supplementary, hon. Member. The employment \ncontracts of different employees for Mauritius Post stipulate different conditions of \nemployment and the conditions of employment are being applied as per those statutory \nprovisions. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, one more. \nMr François: Yes, if you allow me. As you are talking about the post service, may I \nask the hon. Minister in relation to the postal services in Rodrigues whether he is aware of the \nsituation prevailing at one of the sub offices, I seize this opportunity to raise that.  \nAt Malabar which is no more suitable to cater for the high volume of parcels thereat, \nwill he be looking into it so we can relocate and find a wider space for this post office at \nMalabar, Rodrigues. \nDr. Ramtohul: Thank you, hon. Member. Your question actually confirms my previous \nstatement with regard to the lack of actions and the omissions of the previous government. \nThis, Madam Speaker, should have been taken onboard much earlier and we are experiencing \nan influx of parcels – which is actually positive because this is promising to the fact that we \nwill be able to successfully implement the reorganisation and the business review plan of \nMauritius Post Ltd. \nSo, certainly we will give effect to the point raised by the hon. Member. \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMr François: Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: So, you will look at point Malabar issue. \nDr. Ramtohul: Yes. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you very much. On this, I will raise for one and a half hour.  \nAt 1.00 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.32 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Please be seated! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 8 – WATER PIPE LAYING WORKS – TIME FRAME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/521",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 521,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/521) Mr G. P. Venkatasami  (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & \nMoka) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to water pipe \nlaying works carried out in Constituency No. 8, Quartier Militaire and Moka, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, the list of roads concerned \ntherewith, indicating the ones which have not been thereafter reinstated, indicating the \nreasons and timeframe set therefore.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: M. le président, la CWA m’informe que des projets de pose de tuyaux \nd'une longueur d'environ 23,7 km ont été mis en œuvre dans le cadre du programme de \nremplacement des tuyaux de pipe replacement programme dans la circonscription No. 8, \ndonc, Saint-Pierre. Bonne Veine-Quartier Militaire, Vuillemin, Nouvelle Découverte, Verdun \net St Julien D'Hotman. \nLes travaux de remise en état des routes sont terminés, à l'exception des régions de \nVerdun et de Saint-Julien-d'Hotman où respectivement 1,1 km et 1,6 km de route doivent être \nremis en état. \nM. le président, j’apprends également que la région de Verdun, le contrat de réfection \nde la chaussée, donc pour refaire le chemin a été attribué à Transinvest Construction Ltd le 15 \navril 2026. Les travaux de remise en état de la route devraient commencer en mai 2026, dans \nquelques jours j’espère et s'achever en mai 2026. Donc, un mois, en quelques semaines, on \nessayera de terminer ce travail. \nConcernant la région de Saint-Julien-d'Hotman, j'ai été informé que la réfection \ndéfinitive de la route sur 3,8 km sur les 5,4 km a été achevée. Cependant, en raison d'une \nenquête menée par la Financial Crime Commission sur l'entrepreneur, les travaux ont été \nsuspendus en 2025. Le 13 avril 2026, ce mois-ci, suite aux conclusions de l'enquête de la \nFCC, la CWA a enjoint l'entrepreneur de se mobiliser sur le site et de terminer tous les \ntravaux en suspens. Donc, on n’a pas payer l'entrepreneur pendant une année, le restant. \nDonc, les travaux sont restés bloquer et après l’enquête, la FCC nous a informé que \nl’entrepreneur peut continuer le travail, notamment la pose des tuyaux, y compris la mise en \nservice du tuyau principale d'ici juin 2026. \nLes 1,6 km restants de remise en état de la route seront effectués une fois les travaux de \nla pose des tuyaux terminés et devraient être achevés d'ici fin juillet 2026 ou début d’aout. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes! Any Supplementary? First Member for Vacoas & Floréal! \n13 ROAD PROJECTS – CYCLE LANES INCORPORATION – FEASIBILITY \nSTUDY – ACCIDENT REDUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/522",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 522,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floreal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/522) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the \nMinister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the incorporation of cycle lanes into \n13 road projects, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Road Development \nAuthority, information as to whether – \n(a) \ncopy of the feasibility study thereof, if any, will be tabled, and \n(b) \nassessments of the usage levels, impact on accident reduction and user \nsatisfaction thereof have been carried out and, if so, give details thereof and, if \nnot, why not, indicating whether consideration will be given therefor.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness:  Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as the House may be aware, in 2020, the then \nGovernment adopted a policy decision to include cycle lanes in all newly constructed roads. \nIn line with this Government Policy, the RDA has implemented cycle tracks as part of \nmajor road infrastructure projects since 2020. These trucks, typically located on one side of \nthe road and having width between 2.6 metres and 2.8 metres, were intended to encourage \ncycling as an alternative eco-friendly mode of transport. \nAt present, there are 13 road projects where cycle lanes have been or are being \nincorporated across 33km at a cost of about Rs546 million. \nWith respect to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the RDA that no feasibility \nstudy was undertaken prior to the implementation of the cycle lanes as this was pursuant to a \npolicy decision of the former government. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as I mentioned in my speech during the debate on the Budget \n2025/2026 in June 2025, these cycling infrastructures are mostly located outside residential \nzones and have no connection whatsoever to neighbouring villages or existing conurbations. \nIt should therefore come, as most surprised, that most of these infrastructures are lying idle. \nI am informed by the RDA that prior to these recycle lanes becoming fully operational, \na series of soft measures must be implemented to ensure the seamless integration of the new \ninfrastructure into the existing Net Transport Network. These include –  \n(a) \nA National Cycling Master Plan must be developed to not only map the existing \ncycle tracks and identify opportunities to extend and interconnect them into a \ncontinuous safety network but also integrate cycling planning into urban mobility \nstrategies especially near schools, Smart Cities, Business Parks and Transit \nStations; \n(b) \nWith a view to improving connectivity and accessibility, existing cycle tracks \nshould be linked with new dedicated lanes, footpaths and green corridors. In \naddition, proper way finding signage, lighting, crossing and end of trip facilities, \nbike racks, a rest area should be provided; \n(c) \nCampaigns should be launched to encourage cycling for short commutes, health \nbenefits and environmental impact. Moreover, local councils and private sector \nshould be engaged as partners to promote community cycling events, and \n(d) \na nationwide cycling infrastructure inventory and usage monitoring system \nshould be implemented to assess demand, plan upgrades and measure impact.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, given that this is a \nrelatively new policy, I am envisaging to set up a committee to be chaired by the Permanent \nSecretary of my Ministry and comprising all relevant stakeholders, namely – \n• \nrepresentatives of the Ministry of Housing and Lands; \n• \nthe Ministry of Land Transport; \n• \nthe Ministry of Local Government; \n• \nthe Police Department; \n• \nthe TMRSU, and  \n• \nthe RDA.  \nThis committee will be responsible for assessing the usage level of cycle lanes, their \nimpact on accident reduction and overall user satisfaction with a view to guiding future \npolicy decisions, alternate use of these facilities and improvements, if any. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes ! \nMs J. Bérenger: Je vous remercie. Avant de s'engager dans des new dedicated lanes, \nest-ce que le ministère envisage une étude ou même un audit indépendant pour s'assurer de \nl'utilité, de la rentabilité et de la sécurité des pistes existantes et des nouvelles pistes \nenvisagées ? \nMr Gunness: Comme je viens de le dire, M. le président, on a mis un comité qui va \nfaire tout ce travail that the hon. Member is saying. This committee will look into the proper \nusage of the existing cycle lanes and for the future. It costs a lot of money. You can imagine, \nhalf a billion rupees has been invested in these cycle lanes. I can say that they are lying \nalmost idle. In some, you will see grass. C’est décalé avec la route principale. If you go to La \nBrasserie Road, you are not even going to see the cycle lanes. So, a whole study will have to \nbe done. Then, we are going to decide. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Another one! \nMs J. Bérenger: Est-ce qu’on peut avoir un timeline pour le National Cycling Master \nPlan? \nMr Gunness: I cannot put a timeline. What I will do, I will ask the RDA to work rather \nfast because, anyway, for the forthcoming projects, for example, for the M4 Project, we have \nnot inserted cycle lanes in the M4. This is the next big major project that will come. They can \nwork at their ease because in that project, there is no cycle lane. So, they will take their time \nand produce a masterplan. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Grand Baie & Poudre d'Or. \nNORTHERN REGION – FARMERS’ CENTRE – WHOLESALE MARKET \nFACILITY CONVERSION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/523",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 523,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/523) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard \nto the fruit and vegetable sellers of the northern region, he will state whether consideration \nwill be given for the conversion of an existing Farmers’ Centre in the said region into a mini \nwholesale market for the procurement of products as opposed to having to procure same from \nthe National Wholesale Market at Wooton, Belle-Rive, for enhanced cost-effectiveness.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House \nthat Government is fully cognisant of the operational constraints that may be faced by fruit \nand vegetable sellers, particularly those operating in regions located at some distance from \nthe National Wholesale Market at Wooton.  \nNow, while the National Wholesale Market presently operated by the Agricultural \nMarketing Board has been established to bring aggregation in the marketing of agricultural \nproduce, it is not intended to operate in isolation nor as the sole channel of distribution. \nGovernment is, in fact, pursuing a progressive decentralisation and facilitative approach \naimed at bringing markets closer to the stakeholders and enhancing accessibility across \nregions.  \nIn this context, the proposal to make use of existing infrastructure, including farmer \nservice centres for the setting up of satellite or mini wholesale facilities, is being given due \nconsideration by the Ministry.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Agricultural Marketing Board that such \napproach would enable improved proximity of supply for operators, not only in the northern \nregion, but also in the eastern region if we reduce logistical and transportation costs, greater \nparticipation of planters, auctioneers and traders at the regional level and a better alignment \nwith Government's broader objectives in terms of environmental sustainability. By bringing \naggregation and distribution points closer to production zones and end markets, transport \ndistances can be reduced, thereby lowering fuel consumption, easing road congestion and \nultimately reducing the carbon footprint associated with the movement of agricultural \nproduce, enhancing the freshness of agricultural produce.  \nA short supply chain allows fruits and vegetables to reach markets more rapidly and \nwith less handling. This not only improves quality for consumers, but also reduces spoilage \nand losses for planters and traders and enhances regulatory oversight at the regional level. In \nfact, it would also allow the Pesticide Regulatory Office to engage more closely with \nplanters, traders, distributors through the proximity-based monitoring and sensitisation.  \nNow, relevant technical assessment, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, will be undertaken by my \nMinistry with a view to determining the feasibility, operational model and modalities under \nwhich such decentralised facilities will be implemented in an efficient and sustainable \nmanner. These assessments are expected to be completed within a short term with a view to \ninforming subsequent destination.  \nGovernment remains committed to fostering a hybrid and inclusive marketing system \nwhere the National Wholesale Market operates in synergy with regional distribution points \nand existing market structures. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes! \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Will the hon. Minister agree that the \nprevious government’s decision to have a centralised wholesale market at Wooton has a main \nimpact on the high price of vegetables and fruits in the northern region or any region far from \nWooton? \nDr. Boolell: The reply obviously is found in the question that you have put to me. It \ngoes without saying! I recall when we had debates on the amendment to the Agricultural \nMarketing Board in relation to the setting up of the National Wholesale Market, we \nhighlighted the dangers, and we even said, without fear or prejudice, to the then Minister that \nthere will be costs overrun – there have been costs overrun – and that we would end up with a \nwhite elephant on a sand castle.  \nBasically, this is where we are! So, there was no vision. It was mainly a decision taken \nwithout giving thought to all the implications. Today, we have landed up, as I have said, with \na white elephant on a sand castle. \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. May I ask the hon. Minister if a \nconsultation could be arranged at the earliest possible with the small planters of the northern \nregion, especially in Constituencies No. 5, 6 and 7? Thank you. \nDr. Boolell: I always entertain whenever a request is made. I have met our friends \nseveral times. Since there is a legitimate request from a very distinguished MP of the \nconstituency, I will bow and certainly entertain your request. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Just one last question. \nMr Ramkalawon: Yes, one question.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: One last question!  \nMr Ramkalawon: One last question. While awaiting the decentralisation, is there any \nconsideration to change the time schedule for the operations being carried out? \nDr. Boolell: Well, I cannot be specific. We will not act like fools and rush where angels \nfear to tread, but we will certainly entertain your legitimate request. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \nRODRIGUES ISLAND – FOREIGN WORKERS – WORK PERMITS & \nCOMPLIANCE MECHANISM",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/524",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 524,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/524) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nLabour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to foreign workers working in Rodrigues \nIsland, he will state the – \n(a) \nnumber of work permits – \n(i) \nissued over the past five years, indicating the industries and employment \ngrades concerned therewith, and  \n(ii) \napplications awaiting determination, and  \n(b) \nmonitoring mechanism in place to ensure compliance with the relevant labour \nlaws.",
      "answer": "Mr Uteem: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that over the past five years, work \npermits have been issued in respect of 20 foreign workers to take up employment in \nRodrigues for the period January 2021 to date. Only six of those work permits are still active.  \nI am tabling a list of the foreign workers in Rodrigues, the sectors in which they are \nemployed, and their respective grades. \nAs regards part (a) (ii) of the question, my Ministry is in the presence of two \napplications for work permit for foreign workers to work in Rodrigues, and these are under \nconsideration at the level of the Ministry. \nAs for part (b) of the question, I am informed that there is a Labour Office in Port \nMathurin, which operates under the aegis of the Commission of Tourism, ICT, Employment, \nLabour and Industrial Relations within the Rodrigues Regional Assembly. The primary role \nof the Labour Office is to ensure that employers comply with the labour legislation, through \ninspection at work places, handling of complaints reported by workers to recover their legal \ndues, and as a last resort, through court action against non-compliant employers. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to point out that it has been reported to my Ministry that \nemployers in Mauritius have been redeploying their foreign workers to Rodrigues. These \nworkers are holders of a work permit or a certification of exemption to work only in \nMauritius. Without the prior authorisation of my Ministry, employers are not allowed to \ntransfer foreign workers to Rodrigues. \nLast week, officers of my Ministry and myself held meetings in Rodrigues with the \nCommissioner, Head of Departments and officers of the Commission. We agreed that my \nMinistry will not issue any work permit to foreigners to work in Rodrigues without the prior \nclearance from the Commission. My Ministry is also working with the Occupational Safety \nand Health Department of the Commission in Rodrigues for the issue of lodging \naccommodation permits for premises where the foreign workers in Rodrigues will reside. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, one question! \nMr François: Thank you, hon. Minister. May I ask the hon. Minister whether his \nMinistry has implemented any capacity building or training for the local public officers in \nRodrigues to deal with those foreign workers, mainly in regard to inspection and registration \nof complaints? If not, will your Ministry, in collaboration with local authorities, consider this \nmuch needed request? \nMr Uteem: Absolutely, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Last week, we had a very fruitful \nmeeting, where we have agreed to make sure that the labour officers in Rodrigues will get \nadequate training either in Mauritius or officers from my Ministry will come to Rodrigues to \ndo the training or we will do it by way of video conferencing.  \nWe are also working on the legal implication because there seems to be an issue with \nthe lodging accommodation permit, which is issued by my Ministry and not the RRA. So, we \nare taking all this into consideration, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes! \nCOMOROS ISLANDS – SUBSIDISED FLOUR – ALLEGED EXPORTATION – \nCORRECTIVE MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/525",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 525,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/525) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the recent \nalleged exportation of subsidised flour to the Comoros Islands, he will – \n(a) \nstate whether any loophole has been identified in the regulatory and licensing \nframework of his Ministry which could have enabled same and, if so, indicate the \ncorrective measures being envisaged, and  \n(b) \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the estimated quantity \nthereof exported and the estimated corresponding financial loss to Government \nincurred.",
      "answer": "Mr Yeung Sik Yuen: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in September 2025, someone came to \nsee me at the office to inform me about the alleged exportation and sales of subsided flour to \nComoros Islands. My Ministry has started an internal investigation and found that the fraud \nbegan no later than July 2024.  \nIn view of the seriousness of the allegations and the possible diversion of flour intended \nfor subsided bread production in Mauritius, on 14 October 2025, the Mauritius Police Force \nwas requested to investigate into the matter with a view to determining the source of \nprocurement of the flour exported by Mr Moindze. \nOn 23 December 2025, the Central Criminal Investigation Department (CCID) has \ninformed my Ministry that according to records kept at the Passport and Immigration Office, \nMr Abdoulhakim Moindze was presently abroad and his expected date of return was \nunknown. As such, no statement was recorded. An officer-in-charge of PIO was instructed to \nnotify the CCID upon the arrival of Mr Abdoulhakim Moindze for investigation. \nSubsequently, on 06 March 2026, a request was also made to the Financial Crimes \nCommission to investigate into the matter and to determine whether any offence falling under \nits purview may have been committed. \nAs reported in the press, Mr Abdoulhakim Moindze was arrested on 18 April 2026 by \nthe Financial Crimes Commission. Mr Baboo Virendranathsingh Gowreesunkar, a 54-year-\nold director of Ryder Xpress Co. Ltd. was also arrested on 20 April 2026. He is suspected of \nhaving conspired with Mr Abdoulhakim Moindze while acting in his capacity as Director of \nRyder Xpress Co. Ltd. The investigation is still underway.  \nIn addition, my Ministry is working on corrective measures which include the \nintroduction of specific regulations to prohibit the export of subsidised goods without prior \nauthorisation. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (b) of the question, since July 2024 till date, \n287.5 metric tons of flour have been exported to Comoros Islands. Investigations are still \nongoing to determine with certainty the exact origin of all quantities concerned and whether \nall or part thereof consisted of subsidised flour. \nAs for the corresponding financial loss to Government, it would be premature to state a \ndefinitive figure at this stage, as same will depend on the quantities conclusively established \nas having benefitted from subsidy support and, subsequently, diverted from their intended \npurpose. Once investigations are completed and verified facts are available, we will be in a \nbetter position to state the extent of the financial loss. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, question! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, M. le président. \nCan the Minister inform the House whether selling a bag of flour at Rs108 to bakers \nconstituted a significant loophole in this massive fraud? Thank you. \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is definitely a loophole which was \nhere, and the Government has come with corrective measures. We eliminated the price of \nRs108, which is now Rs217.50. We also have to mention that the cost price of a bag of flour \nis Rs650. So, now we have a subsidised price at Rs217.50 per bag. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Last one! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, M. le président. \nCan the Minister inform the House about the current status of the subsidy account? I \nunderstand that R 7.20 is being collected from the sales of Mogas and Gas Oil to finance \nflour, LPG and du riz ration. Merci. \nThe Deputy Speaker: This is very far from your question! Your supplementary is very \nfar from your main… \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: She is asking about the subsidy in fact. \nMs Anquetil: Subsidy account. \nMr Yeung Sik Yuen: How it is being financed. \nIn fact, we have a deficit in the subsidy account. Let me give you the details – \n• \nas at 30 June 2022, there was a deficit of Rs871 million; \n• \nas at 30 June 2023, there was another deficit of Rs243,000; \n• \nas at 30 June 2024, another deficit of Rs109 million; \n• \nas at 30 June 2025, Rs681 million. \nSo, the total is Rs1.9 billion. This is why we have come with corrective measures. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Fourth Member for Rodrigues! \nMAURITIUS & RODRIGUES – PIG BREEDING – MARKET DEMAND – \nFACILITIES & SUPPORT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/526",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 526,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/526) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to pig \nbreeding, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number of pigs \ncurrently being reared in mainland Mauritius and Rodrigues Island respectively, indicating in \neach case, the – \n(a)  yearly market demand for pork and pork products and import sources thereof, and  \n(b)  facilities available and support provided to the pig breeders.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, hon. Member.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the Food and Agriculture Research and \nExtension Institute that currently 24,385 pigs are being reared in Mauritius. As for Rodrigues, \nthe Commission For Agriculture of Rodrigues has informed that for the period January to \nDecember 2025, about 14,200 pigs were reared in Rodrigues. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, statistics available at \nStatistics Mauritius show that the import of pork products for the year 2025 for Mauritius was \naround 1,300 tons and these products were imported from Spain, Brazil, France, China, \nDenmark, Australia, Italy and Turkey. As for local pork production for the year 2025, 695 \ntons of meat were delivered to the market after slaughter at the Mauritius Meat Authority. For \nstatistics on pork products for Rodrigues, the Commissioner For Agriculture of Rodrigues has \ninformed that the Ministry, based on assumptions made and on slaughter statistics for the past \nfew years, it is estimated that the demand for pork in Rodrigues for both consumption and \nprocessing is approximately 485 tons per year. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, the facilities and \nsupport available to breeders by this Government comprise of Feed Subsidy, Breeder Support \nScheme and Grant Scheme. Under the Feed Scheme, pig breeders registered by Small \nFarmers Welfare Fund are provided vouchers of Rs20 per kg of feed purchased up to a \nmaximum of 800 kg per breeder. For Financial Year 2025-2026, 122 pig breeders, out of 128 \nregistered pig breeders of Mauritius, have benefited from this scheme.  \nAs for the Breeder’s Support Scheme introduced in 2025, breeders can avail of \nsubsidies and grants for amongst others reinforcing bio-security at farm level, acquisition of \ngreen technologies, drilling of borehole facilities, acquisition of modern and innovative \ntechnologies and product packaging and marketing. 15 applications received for these \nschemes are under process by the Small Farmers and Welfare Fund awaiting further \ninformation from applicants.  \nAs regard the Grant Scheme, breeders are provided subsidies for the purchase of \nagricultural equipment; upgrading, construction of pigsty, acquisition of CCTV and rainwater \nharvest. To date, one breeder has benefitted from purchase of equipment for a sum of \nRs100,000, two breeders have received a total of Rs221,500 for upgrading of farm and \nanother two breeders’ application for a total of Rs129,410 have been approved. For the \nsubsidy for acquisition of CCTV camera, one application was received for an amount of \nRs15,540 and same has been approved.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to facilities provided to pig farmers, I am informed \nthat during the Financial Year 2024-2025, a Pig Feed Scheme was implemented to support \npig farming. However, it has not been implemented in the Financial Year 2025-2026 due to \nlack of funds and an excess of pigs on the market but this will be redressed. In addition to \nthis, at least three Meat Subsidy Campaigns are implemented yearly to provide farmers with a \nreliable market.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Edouard! \nMr Edouard: Thank you. I thank the hon. Minister for his reply. May I ask the hon. \nMinister if there is specific support for the market in Mauritius of excess pigs from \nRodrigues? \nDr. Boolell: We can dare to venture, but you can rest assured that there is parity of \nesteem in respect to the facilities being extended to Rodrigues and I have said, if there is a \nshortcoming, it will be addressed; forcefully and meaningfully. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes! \nMr François: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister, the last \nconsignment of live pigs exported to Mauritius from Rodrigues dated back in 2015, may I \nknow whether there is discussion by your Ministry with local authorities in Rodrigues to \nresume live importation of pigs with all required sanitary and/or veterinary protocols? \nDr. Boolell: Yes, as you said, subject to that there is full compliance to sanitary and \nphytosanitary laws, certainly this could be entertained, but I cannot give you a decisive reply. \nMr François: Just one more question, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Rightly so, you \nmentioned that there is a surplus of around 14,000… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question! Put your question! \nMr François: … pigs in Rodrigues. Coson pe pous kok dan rodrigues M. le président \nek la vieillesse. Will the hon. Minister confirm whether there is an established protocol or \ntrade agreement for possible export of pork or pork products to neighbouring countries like \nSeychelles? \nDr. Boolell:  But this matter has to be raised at the level of the Indian Ocean \nCommission and we have to make sure that you know, there is compliance to sanitary and \nphytosanitary norms. If the market is there and available, not only Seychelles, but as member \nof SADC, we can certainly widen circle of opportunities and look for markets in many of \nthese countries.  \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Hon. First Member for Savanne & Black River! \nBLACK RIVER (LA BALISE) BOAT PASSAGE – DESILTING WORKS \nPROGRESS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/527",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 527,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/527) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the Black River (La Balise) boat \npassage, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number of times \ndesilting works were carried out thereat, indicating – \n(a)  the date of the last such exercise, and  \n(b)  whether consideration will be given for the urgent desilting thereof on account of \nthe presence of silting thereat currently causing navigational difficulties to users \nthereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, at the very outset, I wish to inform the hon. \nMember that my Ministry is not responsible for dredging or desilting works at La Balise boat \npassage as this does not fall under our jurisdiction.  \nTherefore, the District Council of Black River has neither carried out desilting works at \nLa Balise boat passage, nor does it have the legal mandate to undertake such coastal dredging \nworks.  \nI am also informed that the District Council has not received complaints regarding \nnavigational difficulties at that particular location. However, within its inland mandate, the \nCouncil has undertaken desilting works in nearby rivers channels, namely at Rivière Saint-\nMartin in September 2019, October 2021, February 2023 and February 2026, and at Grande \nRivière Noire in February 2023. \n I am also informed that the Land Drainage Authority completed cleaning and desilting \nworks along Rivière Saint-Martin over approximately 3.5 km up to A3 Black River Road in \nFebruary 2023.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, although this matter does not fall under the District Council's \ndirect responsibility, I caused inquiry to be made in good faith with all relevant authorities \nconcerned. The Ministry of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries has \nadvised that La Balise boat passage is presently practicable for navigation and no complaints \nhave been registered from fishermen regarding thereon.  \nThe Beach Authority has also confirmed that it has no mandate to dredging or desilting \nin the lagoon or river mouth area as its role is confined to beach management only.  \nI am further informed by the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management and \nClimate Change that a request submitted by La Balise Marina in April 2025 for dredging at \nthe Rivière Noire mouth could not proceed as such works requires an Environmental Impact \nAssessment under item 27 of the sixth schedule of the Environment Act 2024 and no \napplication has been submitted by the promoter till date.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that a \nseparate request was made in January this year by the Commissioner of Police for urgent \ndesilting works at the National Coast Guard berthing area at Black River, where sediment \ndeposition was affecting the safe berthing and operational deployment.  \nFollowing a site visit by several authorities, the Ministry of Environment issued in \nMarch 2026, a no objection for desilting works strictly limited to that particular operational \narea, subject to given environmental safeguards. I am further informed that the Police \nDepartment and the Ministry of National Infrastructure are currently finalising the technical \nspecifications, following which, a bidding exercise will be launched soon for implementation. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I, therefore, wish to reiterate that the District Council of Black \nRiver is not the responsible body for coastal dredging or desilting at La Balise. Nevertheless, \nall relevant authorities have been consulted and where intervention is required, the authorities \nare taking the necessary actions through appropriate legal technical and environmental \nprocedures to go ahead with the Commissioner of Police’s request. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka! \nMOHUNLALL MOHIT GOVERNMENT SCHOOL, L'AVENIR – \nELECTRICITY SUPPLY ISSUES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/528",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 528,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/528) Mr G. P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the Mohunlall \nMohit Government School, situated at L'Avenir, he will state whether the electricity supply \nissues occurring in a few classrooms thereat have been addressed and, if so, when and, if not, \nindicate the timeframe therefor.",
      "answer": "Dr. Gungapersad: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that the \ndisruptions to the electricity supply at Mohunlall Mohit Government School situated at \nL'Avenir are currently localised to five classrooms within a single block. This situation is the \ndirect result of water ingress caused by roof leakages. I must emphasise that the electrical \nsupply to these specific rooms was disconnected by the Energy Services Division (ESD) as a \nproactive and essential safety measure to protect both students and staff. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, upon consultation, the ESD advised that no viable quick fix or \nmedium-term electrical bypass could be safely implemented while the water ingress \npersisted. Consequently, the only sustainable solution is to resolve the structural leakages \nbefore reinstating power. To this end, a comprehensive assessment of the entire school \ncompound has been completed.  \nI can confirm the following timeline of actions taken by the Ministry – \n• \nOn 11 February 2026, invitations for bids were officially launched.  \n• \n25 February 2026, procurement process closed followed by a rigorous \nevaluation.  \n• \nOn 27 April 2026, the contract was formally awarded following and \nendorsement by the Zonal Bid Committee. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, physical works onsite are tentatively scheduled to commence \nduring the first week of May 2026. The scope of work which includes extensive roof repairs \nand associated remedial tasks is expected to last four weeks. Immediately upon completion of \nthese repairs, the ESD will be directed to conduct a safety inspection and reinstate the power \nsupply. We anticipate the classrooms will be fully operational by early June 2026. \nIn the interim, I have been assured that robust contingency arrangements are in place to \nensure that pedagogical activities continue without hindrance. The safety and educational \ncontinuity of our learners remain our absolute priority. Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Members, the Table has been advised that PQs B/533, \nB/541, B/543, B/546, B/548, and B/558 have been withdrawn. \nThe hon. Third Member for Flacq & Bon Acceuil! \nNPF & NSF – CREDIT BALANCES & INVESTMENT RETURNS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/529",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 529,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/529) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked \nthe Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity whether, in regard \nto the National Pensions Fund and the National Solidarity Fund, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the Investment Committee thereof, information as to the – \n(a) \nbalance currently standing to the credit thereof, and \n(b) \ninvestments effected since 2015 to date, indicating the profit or loss realised \nthereon.",
      "answer": "Mr Subron: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that the National \nPensions Fund was established under Section 37 of the National Pension Act 1976 which \nshall be administered by the Minister of Social Security in accordance with Finance and \nAudit Act. \nContributions into the fund were being made by both employers and employees of the \nprivate sector at the rate of 6% and 3%, respectively, under the National Pensions Scheme. \nHowever, the previous government stopped the contribution scheme in August 2020 and \nintroduced the Contribution Sociale Généralisée (CSG) as from 01 September 2020. \nI am assuming that the hon. Member is referring to the National Savings Fund instead \nof the National Solidarity Fund. The National Savings Fund (NSF) was established under \nSection 3 of the National Savings Fund Act 1995 with the objectives – \n• \nto provide for the payment of a lumpsum to every employee on his retirement and \nin respect of every employee at the time of his death, and \n• \nto set up and operate for the benefits of employees such schemes, including loan \nschemes, as may be prescribed.  \nEmployers contribute 2.5% in respect of each employee. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Section 38 of the National Pensions Act provides for the \nsetting up of an NPF/NSF Investment Committee under the chair of the Financial Secretary. \nAny surplus remaining in the National Pensions Fund and the National Savings Fund may, at \nany time, be held on deposit with the government or invested in such manner as the NPF and \nNSF Investment Committee may determine. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that the fund value, that is, the \nbalance standing to the credit of the National Pensions Fund stood at around Rs165.1 billion. \nThe fund value of the National Savings Fund stood at around Rs50.26 billion as at December \n2025.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, may I add, for the attention of the House, that the regeneration \nof the National Pensions Fund to replace the Contribution Sociale Généralisée is presently \none of the attributions of the Commission of Expert on Pension Reforms, set up by the \nCabinet in September 2025, with a view to overhaul the national pensions system.  \nA ministerial committee on pension reforms has also been set up by the Cabinet to \nprovide guidance to the commission on strategic direction and policy priorities for the reform \nof the pension system.  \nTo access and act on the recommendations of the commission under the chair of the \nhon. Prime Minister, the following hon. Ministers form part of the Steering Committee: the \nhon. Deputy Prime Minister; the hon. Minster of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue \nEconomy and Fisheries; the hon. Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National \nSolidarity; the hon. Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning; the hon. Minister \nof Labour and Industrial Relations; the hon. Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperatives; the \nhon. Junior Minister of Finance, and the Junior Minister of Social Integration, Social Security \nand National Solidarity. \nAs at date, no meeting of the Steering Committee on Pensions Reform has been held.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the \nHouse that the fact that these two funds are investment funds and they constantly buy and sell \non a day-to-day basis. As a matter of example, NPF has purchased some Rs222 billion of \ngovernment instruments over the past 10 years. These investments have matured and have \nbeen reinvested.  \nAs at 31 December 2025, the NPF’s return on investment was 7.25 and the NSF’s \nreturn on investment was 7.21%. As at 31 December, the annual returns of both the NPF and \nthe NSF since 2015 are being tabled.  \nThank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Rodrigues! \n \nFISHERMAN REGISTRATION CARD – PLASTIC/E-IDENTITY CARD",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/530",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 530,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/530) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister \nof Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to the \nFisherman Registration Card, he will state whether consideration will be given for the \nintroduction of a Plastic or E-Identity Card.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, Sir. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as at date, there are \n2506 registered fishermen or fishers and in accordance with Section 120 (3) of the Fisheries \nAct – every fisherman must be issued with a Fisherman Registration Card along with a Fisher \nIdentity Card. \nMoreover, Section 121 of the Fisheries Act provides that every registered Fisher shall \nhave in his or her possession, his or her Fisher Identity Card while engaging in fishing or \nfishing related activities. \nThe Fisher ID Card which is a hard and waterproof plastic card contains the following \ndetails – \n1. \nFull name, address of the Fisherman; \n2. \nFisherman Registration Number; \n3. \nName of Fisheries Post where the fisherman is registered; \n4. \nMode and ground of fishing, and \n5. \nName of the Fish Landing Station concerned. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, hence, there is today both a plastic Fisher Identity Card and a \nFisher Registration Card which is a 14 pages paper booklet. Now, being given that the Fisher \nRegistration Card may be prone to damage when in contact with water, a plastic Fisher \nIdentity Card has been issued to every single registered Fisher around the island. \nAs at now, both Fisher Identity Card and Fisher Registration Card are serving the \npurpose for which they are meant. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member of Rodrigues. B/532! \nMOGAS & GAS OIL – MONTHLY VAT PAYABLE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/531",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 531,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Adrien Duval)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/531) Mr A. Duval (Fourth Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to \nMogas and Gas Oil, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the State Trading \nCorporation, information as to the estimated monthly amount of Value Added Tax payable \nthereon respectively, under the prevailing price structure.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCLIMATE CRISIS – VULNERABLE PERSONS – SOCIAL PROTECTION \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/532",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 532,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rodrigues (Mr François)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/532) Mr J. F. François (Second Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister \nof Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity whether, in regard to the social \nprotection of vulnerable persons against the impact of climate crisis, he will state the – \n(a) \nmeasures in place or being envisaged to mitigate the effects thereof and assistance \nprovided to those affected thereby, and \n(b) \nmechanisms for – \n(i) \nthe sustainable financing thereof \n(ii) \nthe rapid disbursement of funds in case of climate-related disasters, and \n(iii)  ensuring long-term financial resilience in the post-disaster period.",
      "answer": "Mr Subron: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Mauritius being a small island developing state is \nhighly vulnerable to climate-related hazards such as severe tropical cyclones, flash floods, \nsea-level rise, massive beach erosion and heat waves among others. \nAs such, the country and our people are at great risk and are exposed to changing \nclimate conditions and crisis. Having registered our first climate related disaster in 2013 with \nthe death of 11 of our citizens, Mauritius has put in place its first major legal and institutional \nframework to mitigate climate risk and response to climate emergencies. \nThe National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act was enacted in 2016. \nDuring the last 10 years, various shortcomings of this legal framework have been highlighted \nespecially when two workers tragically lost their lives during the Belal cyclone torrential rain \nin January 2024. \nBeing part of the Ministerial Committee presided by my colleague, hon. Minister Reza \nUteem, I am informed that the new legal framework on torrential rain to protect the lives of \nworkers without discrimination will be a reality shortly. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, climate issues are cross-sectional and intersect with many \nMinistries and institutions. My Ministry, which has been historically responsible of Evacuee \nCentres for cyclonic conditions, has seen its mandate in 2015 extended to open the 156 \nEvacuee Centres under its responsibility, upon a request from the National Emergency \nOperations Command (NEOC) in the event of torrential rain, flooding or any other national \ndisasters. These Evacuee Centres are supplied with basic amenities such as bottle water, \nbiscuits, bake beans, now, canned tuna and yoga mats. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed that in accordance with the Social Aid \nRegulations 1984, a cyclone allowance of Rs250 is payable to persons per night spent at the \nEvacuee Centres and a flood allowance amounting to amounting to Rs250 is payable for \ndamaged foodstuffs per person per day for a maximum of three days upon presentation of a \nPolice Memo. \nWhen this new Government took office, based on the responsibility or pre/post \nresponsibility of my Ministry, I reframed this Ministry’s role in the context of climate crisis \nunfolding in the Republic of Mauritius and on its people. I created a Climate Unit in my \nMinistry to work for the recognition and integration of the concept of climate-related victims \nwithin climate policy frameworks of the new Government. \nThe climate crisis is not only an issue of reduction of carbon emission under Nationally \nDetermined Contribution (NDC) for countries like ours. Climate crisis has become a living \nreality generating climate-related victims with loss of lives, personal belongings and affecting \nthe very livelihood of the people, especially the most socially vulnerable and the climate \nvulnerable people. \nThus, my Ministry has reshaped the climate policy of our country towards what is \ncalled the climate jargon “adaptation and mitigation” with emphasis, on the affected people, \nthat is, climate-related victims. \n The hon. Member is right in asking on measures put in place or being envisaged to \nmitigate the effects on vulnerable peoples and assistance provided to those affected. The \nSocial Integration Division of my Ministry has, for the past several years, had several \nprojects. \nThe Deputy Speaker: If you have got long to go, you can circulate the answer – if you \nso wish. You have already taken more than five minutes. \nMr Subron: Yes. I can circulate it. That is not a problem, with pleasure. \nThank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you.  \nMr François: Can I put a supplementary? \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, of course, you can put a supplementary. \nMr François: Thank you, hon. Minister – a very interesting subject. \nWill the, hon. Minister be agreeable with me that social protection to climate change is \na bit underrepresented in our NCD 3.0, as it is mostly related to absorb the impact shocks but \nnot a sustainable social protection system? I mean a system which should look into \nenvironment and development process through cross sectoral policies to avoid and minimise \nresidual loss and damage. May I know whether Mauritius applied for any funds under the \nLoss and Damage Fund created during COP 28 to strengthen resilience and to help people \naffected or victims of climate change? \nMr Subron: I thank the hon. Member and this is in fact the next part of my answer – I \nwill circulate. I am just mentioning that there are several mitigating measures that we are \nenvisaging (flood proofing, flood barriers, properly equipped Evacuee Centres, providing \nwater harvesting system, early warning systems and maybe relocation of socially vulnerable \nand climate vulnerable people) and that we will be presenting together with the Ministry of \nEnvironment.  \nIn fact, the Fund for responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD) and some of the measures \nwill be presented in the conference that will be held in Mauritius – the Mauritius Climate \nInvestment Fund. What we are aiming at is trying to get the global climate fund to be used for \nclimate related victims. Most of these funds, because of the budgetary constraints, will be \nkind of non-budgetary but external or other source of fund. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. \n \nFESTIVAL INTERNATIONAL KREOL – CONCEPT & ORIENTATION REVIEW – \nTOURIST ATTRACTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/533",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 533,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Tourism",
      "question": "(No. B/533) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Tourism whether, in regard to the Festival International Kreol, \nhe will state whether consideration will be given for a review of the concept and orientation \nthereof with a view to enhancing its cultural heritage and content, incorporating symposiums \nand conferences, increasing local and foreign participation and developing same into a major \nannual tourist attraction.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral. \n \nENERGY TRANSITION – RENEWABLE RESOURCES – WIND ENERGY \nINFRASTRUCTURE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/534",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 534,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/534) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the country’s \nobjective to accelerate its energy transition in terms of renewable energy sources, he will state \nthe existing wind energy infrastructure in Mauritius, indicating the – \n(a) \nfuture proposed developments thereof; \n(b) \ntargets set therefor, and  \n(c) \nchallenges and opportunities thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: M. le président, le CEB m'informe qu'il existe actuellement un parc \néolien à la centrale de Plaine des Roches d'une capacité installée de 9,35 mégawatts, et qui \nfait l'objet d'un contrat, d'un PPA, signé le 15 juillet 2013 qui a été inauguré après par le \ngouvernement de 2014-2015. Le parc éolien comprend 11 éoliennes qui représentent environ \n0,3 % du mix électrique national.  \nIl convient aussi de noter, M. le président, qu'un projet de parc éolien à Plaine Sophie, \nd'une capacité de 29,4 mégawatts avait été initié dans le temps entre 2018-2019, mais \nfinalement abandonné en novembre 2020. M. le président, l'énergie éolienne est l'une des \ncomposantes de notre stratégie nationale en matière d'énergie renouvelable. Mon ministère, le \nCEB, MARENA, EEMO, entend diversifier le bouquet énergétique renouvelable en \ncombinant à moyen et à long terme des technologies éprouvées comme l'éolien, le solar et \nd'autres technologies telles que l'éolien en mer.  \nConcernant les points (a) et (b) de la question, M. le président, le CEB propose – là, \nactuellement, nous proposons d'étendre le parc éolien de Plaine des Roches d'une capacité \nsupplémentaire de 15 à 20 mégawatts. Le régime de vent et de performance des turbines étant \ndéjà connu, parce que nous l'avons fait en 2013, nous sommes en train d'acquérir environ 90 \nhectares de terre à Plaine des Roches pour le développement de ce projet. Le CEB prépare \nactuellement l'appel d'offre qui sera lancé d'ici juin de cette année-ci. Le projet sera mis en \nœuvre selon le modèle d'un IPP et produira environ, je l'espère, autour de 20 mégawatts.  \nMon ministère, M. le président, étudie activement le développement de l'énergie \néolienne en mer. Une étude préfaisabilité menée par l'Université Technique du Danemark a \nidentifié un potentiel d'environ 100 mégawatts, notamment dans la région nord-nord-est du \npays. D'autres études sont en cours d'élaboration avec le soutien des partenaires \ninternationaux.   \nM. le président, il faut bien se dire que notre stratégie en ce qui concerne l'énergie \nrenouvelable repose sur cinq axes solides. Depuis une année, nous travaillons sur la stratégie \npour atteindre 60 % d'énergie renouvelable, non pas en 2030, mais en 2035. Donc, on se \ndonne autour de 10 ans, 2026-2035, autour de 9 à 10 ans pour arriver à 60 % d'énergie \nrenouvelable. Donc, j'ai gardé les 60 % d'énergie renouvelable, mais nous avons reset pour \nrepousser à 2035. Donc, les cinq axes reposent d'abord sur l'énergie solaire ; les 405 \nmégawatts lancés en termes de tender qui a été lancé la semaine dernière, l'énergie solaire, les \n10 par 10 mégawatts, 100 mégawatts, les 3 x 40 mégawatts, 120 mégawatts et aussi le vent, \nle parc éolien de Plaine des Roches que nous voulons agrandir.  \nCeci dit, nous avons aussi l'intention de valoriser la bagasse. Et comme \npersonnellement je l'ai dit à plusieurs reprises – je crois l’avoir dit à plusieurs reprises, il n'y a \npas de bagasse. La bagasse, à mon avis, n'a pas d'avenir si nous ne faisons pas ce que d'autres \npays ont fait avant nous, c'est de phase out le charbon graduellement par la biomasse. Et en \nparlant de biomasse, nous parlons de wooden chips. Au fil des années, dans les 3 ans à venir, \nnous voulons remplacer le charbon par au moins 15 % de charbon qu’on va brûler en \nl'entrecoupe ensemble avec la bagasse. Donc, c'est la biomasse. Nous avons aussi lancé le \nhousehold project sur les toits des maisons. Cela forme partie des cinq axes que nous avons \nidentifiés pour les 10 ans à venir ; les households.  \nDonc, vous mettez un panneau de 10 kilowatts sur votre maison sans la permission du \nCEB. Je l'ai dit à plusieurs reprises, l'un des blocages que j'ai remarqués depuis très \nlongtemps et aussi en tant que ministre, c'est que le CEB prend son temps – 4 mois, 5 mois, 6 \nmois, une année pour vous donner la permission de mettre des panneaux pour être autonome \nchez vous. À mon avis, c'est une aberration. C'est pour cette raison que j'ai demandé de lever \ncet obstacle pour que dorénavant, n'importe qui dans ce pays qui veut être autonome de 10 \nkilowatts ; vous mettez sur votre maison et vous avez l'autonomie pour vous personnellement \net de revendre aussi avec le CEB.  \nNous avons aussi, dans notre politique, M. le président, la batterie ; le stockage. Notre \nproblème à nous, c'est de 6 heures à 10 heures, de 6 heures à 9 heures du soir, nous avons la \npointe. Le CEB est sous la pression. Donc, ce que nous avons fait, c'est que dorénavant \ndepuis une année, tous les projets d'énergie renouvelable de ce pays est obligé d'être équipé \nde la batterie. C'est pour cette raison que nous avons acheté, il y a une année, une batterie de \n20 mégawatts qui sera opérationnelle en fin juin ou juillet de cette année-ci. Donc, ces 20 \nmégawatts que nous avons achetés de batterie, va nous aider en termes de pointe. Nous \npensons aussi acheter d'autres batteries. Donc, tous les projets que vous voyez dans les \njournaux, tous les projets que nous avons mis en public, ce sont des projets avec batterie. \nDonc, c'est obligatoire.  \nDernier point de notre axe dans la stratégie énergétique, M. le président, c'est \nl'efficacité énergétique, la sobriété énergétique, l'efficience énergétique. Moi je l'appelle le \nnégawatt – pas le mégawatt. C'est le mégawatt non utilisé. C'est le professeur Joël de Rosnay \n– quand mon ami l'honorable Osman Mahomed était à la tête de Maurice Durable, c'était le \nnégawatt. Donc, la campagne d'efficience énergétique qui commence encore une fois à partir \nde juillet de cette année-ci, sera une campagne d'efficience énergétique agressive pour éviter \nle gaspillage ; faire comprendre à la population, faire comprendre aux entrepreneurs que \nl'audit énergétique, l'économie énergétique, la sobriété énergétique nous fera gagner en \nmégawatt.  \nDonc, ces cinq axes, M. le président, notre stratégie énergétique pour les cinq, six \nprochaines années ou neuf ans, ce sera autour de ces projets. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you still need a further question? \nDr. Aumeer: Merci, M. le président, bien sûr.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes? \nDr. Aumeer: Puis-je demander au ministre concerné, dans la volonté d'agrandir le parc \néolien de Plaine des Roches, quelle sera la contribution sur les 60 % que vous voulez réaliser \nà 2035, sur le national grid de par les fermes éoliennes ? \nMr Assirvaden: Ce que ce que j'ai dit un peu plus tôt, M. le président, c'est que les \nparcs que nous avons à Plaine des Roches contribuent très peu, je peux dire très peu, 0,3 % de \nnotre mix énergétique. C'est pour cette raison que nous croyons au ministère qu’un bouquet \nénergétique fera l'affaire du pays. Vous savez, nous avons des demandes en pointe et nous \navons aussi des demandes en base load comme on dit dans le jargon. Donc, le base load, il y \na peut-être deux technologies qui peuvent répondre au base load – le charbon, l'huile lourde. \n Donc, nous sommes obligés d'avoir un bouquet énergétique. Un bouquet énergétique, \nvous avez le vent, vous avez le soleil, vous avez l'efficience énergétique, vous avez la \nbagasse, vous avez la biomasse, les wooden chips, mais aussi la batterie. Donc, la partie \néolienne va contribuer très minimement, si je peux dire à notre bouquet énergétique, mais \ncela va contribuer à ce que ce soit un vrai bouquet. Vous savez comment c'est un bouquet ; \navec des roses et autres choses ? Donc, notre bouquet énergétique va comprendre beaucoup \nde fleurs. Merci. \nMs Anquetil: Tu connais ça bien. Tu t’y connais en bouquet ! \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes! \nTWAHA ACADEMY – ALLEGED MINOR ILL-TREATMENT CASES – INQUIRY & \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/535",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 535,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/535) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the alleged \ncases of aggression and ill-treatment of two minors at the Twaha Academy, she will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Family Support Unit, information as to whether an \ninquiry has been initiated thereinto and, if so, indicate the outcome thereof and the measures \ntaken in connection therewith.",
      "answer": "Ms Navarre-Marie: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry has been made aware of \nseven alleged cases of child ill-treatment at the Twaha Academy Boarding School.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, on 01 April 2026, the Family Support Service of Flacq was \ncontacted by the Bel Air Rivière Sèche Police Station to report that two minors, M. Z. Z. H. \nM., aged 15 and, M. A. I., aged 14 had stated that one Mr A. P., Principal at the Twaha \nAcademy Boarding School, had once given them a cigarette to smoke, after which, they felt \ndizzy. \nThe officers were informed that the two minors had been convened to record their \nstatements on 02 April 2026. The Police was advised to inform the minors and their parents \nto attend the Family Support Service of Flacq after recording their statements at the police \nstation. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that on 02 April 2026, the Bel-Air Rivière \nSèche Police Station was contacted by my officers as neither the minors nor their parents had \nattended the Family Support Service of Flacq. The Police informed that the minors, in the \npresence of their respective mothers, had recorded their statements at the Bel-Air Rivière \nSèche Police Station and that an alleged case of child ill-treatment had been entered under \nOB 1158/26 as a pre-measure against the principal of the institution, Mr A.P. It is to be noted \nthat no case of sexual abuse was reported under that OB number.  \nHowever, the Family Support Service of Flacq contacted the parents of the minors and \nexplained the services offered by the Ministry, but the parents declined that their children be \nmedically examined and did not wish any psychological support. They were, however, \nprovided with the contact details of the Family Support Service for future reference. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, on 07 April 2026, the Bel-Air Rivière Sèche Police Station \ninformed the Family Support Service of Flacq that a 13-year-old minor, M.S.N.B., had \nrecorded a statement in the presence of his mother in connection with an alleged case of child \nill-treatment, and OB1245/2026 was entered. As per the statement, the child had been slapped \non his cheek by the principal of the institution, Mr A.P.  \nOn the same day, the minor M.S.N.B., accompanied by his mother, attended the Family \nSupport Service of Flacq, where he reported that he had been a victim of both physical and \nverbal abuse by Mr A.P. On the following day, he was medically examined by the Police \nMedical Officer at Line Barracks.  \nMy Ministry has provided the minor and his mother with psychological assistance. A \nreview had been scheduled for 23 April 2026. Follow-up sessions are being maintained by \nthe FSS of Flacq. \nOn 09 April 2026, another minor, M.S.D.A., 11 years old, made a statement to the \npolice station, in the presence of his father, to the effect that he was, on several occasions, \nassaulted by Mr A.P., the last time being in March 2026, with a mop stick. He was examined \nby the Police Medical Officer on 14 April 2026. \nOn 11 April 2026, one person named M.M.H.N., now 18 years old, reported that when \nhe was 17 years old and a student at Twaha Academy Boarding School, he was assaulted by \nMr A.P. He did not want to be medically examined.  \nOn 13 April 2026, another minor, S.Z.B., aged 13 years, accompanied by his mother, \nmade a statement at Bel-Air Rivière Sèche Police Station in connection with OB1158/26 \nchild abuse case.  \nOn the same day, minor S.Z.B. and his mother attended the Family Support Service of \nFlacq. He related that he joined Twaha Academy Boarding School since November 2025, and \nin February 2026, Mr A.P. had hit him with a bamboo stick. He further stated that in March \n2026, Mr A.P. had hit him on his head as he was scratching his eyes during prayer time. On \nthe same day, minor S.Z.B. was seen by a psychologist of my Ministry, and the case was \nreferred to FSS Triolet for further assessment. \nOn 21 April, minor M.A.I., aged 14 years, student of the Twaha Academy Boarding \nSchool, stated, in the presence of his mother, that he was assaulted by Mr A.P. on several \noccasions, but he refused to be medically examined.  \nOn the same day, another minor, M.Z.Z.H.M., aged 15, student of the Twaha Academy \nBoarding School, made a statement, in the presence of his mother, that he was assaulted by \nMr A.P. on several occasions. \nI am informed that a police enquiry is ongoing on the allegations made against the \nprincipal of the Twaha Academy Boarding School. I am further informed that the Twaha \nAcademy Boarding School has ceased its operation since 31 March 2026. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, I will allow you a supplementary, but be careful. There is \nstill a police enquiry going on, and we do not want to prejudice the police enquiry. \nMs Anquetil: Oui, il n’y a pas de problème.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: So, be careful with your supplementary! \nMs Anquetil: Ne vous inquiétez pas, M. le président. Ne vous inquiétez pas. \n M. le président, je vous remercie de me donner l’opportunité de poser quelques \nquestions supplémentaires. La ministre peut-elle indiquer à la Chambre, dans cette affaire \naussi grave et traumatisante, comment se portent les enfants victimes, ainsi que leurs \nfamilles ? Merci. \nMs Navarre-Marie: M. le président, à ce jour, ce matin, je n’ai pas eu les nouvelles \ndes enfants et des parents. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Last one! \nMs Anquetil: S’il vous plaît, M. le président. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question and I will see whether… \nMs Anquetil: La ministre peut-elle déposer sur la table de l’Assemblée un relevé précis \net daté du nombre de séances de soutien psychologique effectivement dispensées aux \nvictimes et à leurs parents ? Je vous remercie, M. le président. \nMs Navarre-Marie: M. le président, je ne suis pas en présence de ces informations \nright now. \nMs Anquetil: Une dernière, M. le président. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Allez, une dernière ! \nMs Anquetil: Je vous remercie, M. le président. La ministre peut-elle indiquer à la \nChambre si son ministère a réellement la capacité d’assumer un suivi psychologique régulier \net efficace compte tenu du nombre d’enfants qui se sont manifestés – vous avez d’ailleurs \nlisté les victimes –, ainsi que de leurs familles, ou admet-elle que les ressources actuelles sont \ninsuffisantes pour répondre à l’ampleur des besoins ?  Je vous remercie, M. le président. \nMs Navarre-Marie: M. le président, je pense que les psychologues sont suffisamment \nqualifiés pour support the families. Mais, toujours est-il que les ressources ne seront jamais \nsuffisantes. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 9 – PUBLIC TRANSPORT – ADDITIONAL BUS ROUTES & \nTAXI LICENCES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/536",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 536,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/536) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to public transport in Constituency No. 9, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, \ninformation as to whether consideration will be given for the provision of additional bus \nroutes and Public Service Vehicle (Taxi) Licences thereat and, if so, give details thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Constituency No. 9, Flacq-Bon \nAccueil, spans over a reasonably wide geographical area. It comprises several villages and \nresidential zones with Central Flacq serving as the principle socio-economic hub.  \nI am informed by the NLTA that the constituency benefits from an extensive bus \nservice network of 37 routes. Public transport services in the constituency are mainly \nprovided by individually-owned buses, operating under Bus Owners Cooperative Society \nLimited, along some 34 routes as well as by the NTC on Route 56, the Triolet Bus Service on \nRoute 29, and Divla Ltd on Route 240.  \nThese 37 routes may be broadly grouped as follows – \n• \n6 routes serving the North, which include regions such as Goodlands, Grand Baie \nand Rivière du Rempart; \n• \n7 routes serving the region of Port Louis; \n• \n9 routes serving the regions such as Curepipe, Rose Hill and surrounding areas; \n• \n8 routes serving the eastern coastal belt, including regions such as Belle Mare, \nPalmar, Trou d’Eau Douce and Poste Lafayette; \n• \n5 routes serving as local and circular routes within the outskirts of Central Flacq. \nIn view of the extensive nature of this network, I am tabling the full list of bus routes to \nand from Constituency No. 9.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed by the NLTA that it has received \nrepresentations from inhabitants of some localities on poor bus services.  Following an \nassessment, it has been observed that the issue at hand is not so much the absence of routes, \nbut rather the adequacy, frequency and the financial viability of services on certain existing \nroutes. \nThe routes identified by the NLTA having inadequate services are – \n(a) \nRoute 218 (the description is in the list); \n(b) \nRoute 55A, and \n(c) \nRoute 54. \nServices along these three routes are provided by buses of other routes on a roster basis \nunder the trip-based payment under a contract between the NLTA and Flacq Bus Owners \nCooperative Society Ltd. \nIt is worth underlining that previously, twice buses were licensed along route 218 and \ntwo buses were also granted licences for route 55A. All these buses could not continue \nproviding services along these routes as they were uneconomical. The operators were bound \nto seek transfer of their licences to other routes.  \nThe grant of licences along these routes will therefore not solve the transport problems \nof residents of those regions, as after a period of time, the new operators will not be able to \nsustain the services. \nThe better solution, according to the NLTA, would be to increase substantially the \nnumber of paid trips being provided under the contracts with the cooperative society both \nduring week days and weekends. This arrangement, hopefully, will better meet the needs of \ncommuters and although it may be costly, the more so, as the Flacq Bus Owners Cooperative \nSociety Ltd is requesting for a substantial increase in the rate of payment per trip. \nThe NLTA has also informed that Constituency No. 9 has a total of 686 taxi cars \nlicensed to operate from 77 bases of operation, besides the 333 taxis licensed at hotels. \nTherefore, a total of 1,019 taxis, out of 7,803 which is a total of 13%, the highest among all \nthe 20 Constituencies. Mr Anil Bachoo will surely agree with me. These taxi cars mostly \noperate as “taxi train” known as separate pairs and complement transport needs along \ncorridors which bus services are either not operational or the services are inadequate.  \nTo end, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as part of my broader approach to closely monitor \npublic transport issues across all constituencies, I shall shortly, as discussed, convene a \nmeeting with the hon. Members of elected for Constituency No. 9 to discuss the matters in \ndetail. I wish to underline that similar exercises have been carried out in other Constituencies \nsince my becoming Minister of Land Transport and have proven to be constructive in \naddressing ground-level concerns. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member! \nMr Beechook: Yes, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Will the hon. Minister urge the NLTA to \ncarry out a thorough investigation that will include checking whether annual revenue returns \nare being done by current taxi operators at the MRA in order to track and if needed, cancel \nthe PSV licences of those taxis which are inoperational today and allocate them to people \nwho are willing to offer the service. \nMr Osman Mahomed: I definitely welcome this question, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, but \nI think, this problem is a chronic problem around the country. Taxi drivers are supposed to \nprovide taxi services but they don't adequately do so. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Montagne Blanche & Grand River \nSouth East! \nOVERSEAS MEDICAL TREATMENT – BENEFICIARIES (JANUARY 2021 TO \nDECEMBER 2025) – NATIONAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/537",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 537,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/537) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) asked \nthe hon. Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to overseas medical treatment, he \nwill state the number of Mauritian patients having resorted thereto over the past five years, \nindicating the – \n(a)  countries and medical conditions commonly concerned therewith, and  \n(b)  measures being implemented to strengthen public healthcare services at national \nlevel.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that my Ministry \nprovides financial assistance under Overseas Treatment Scheme for patients requiring \nmedical treatment not available in our public health institutions in Mauritius. \nAccording to my Ministry’s policy, provision is made for financial assistance under the \nfollowing schemes – \ni. \npatients over 25 years old, a total of Rs1.3 million, and \nii. \nunder the Child Cancer Scheme and Paediatric Scheme unlimited assistance for \npatients up to 25 years old. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that a total of 1,851 patients have benefitted \nfrom financial assistance under the above schemes from January 2021 to December 2025. I \nam further informed that, since this Government took office, a total of 786 patients, for period \nfor December 2024 to April 2026, have received financial assistance including 105 patients \nunder the Child Cancer Scheme. These Schemes are being reviewed. There have been \ncomplete abuse and over-exaggeration with the colossal amount of funds disbursed for \ntreatment. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, I am, with your permission, tabling the \ninformation as requested. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, my Ministry is continuously implementing a series \nof measures aimed at strengthening public healthcare services at the national level. These \nmeasures include sustained massive investment in healthcare infrastructures, state-of-the-art \nequipment and human resources. These measures would, to a large extent, reduce our \ndependency on foreign hospitals for treatment of our patients. \nDuring this financial year, an allocation of approximately Rs18.5 billion has been \nearmarked for the health sector, reflecting Government’s commitment to modernising and \nstrengthening public healthcare delivery across all levels of care. \nAt the primary care level, the following measures are being implemented – \n• \nprevention, early detection and community-based management of diseases, \nparticularly non-communicable diseases; \n• \ndiabetic retinal screening and diabetic foot care are being decentralised to \ncommunity level, and \n• \nstructured programmes for early intervention and lifestyle modification for \ndiabetes and pre-diabetes patients, supported by the development of specialised \ndiabetic care centres. \nAt the secondary level – \n• \nRegional hospitals are being continuously upgraded with improved diagnostic \nand treatment facilities, and \n• \nSpecialised services are being decentralised to improve accessibility and reduce \npressure on tertiary institutions. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, at the tertiary care level – \n• \nthe Trauma and Emergency Unit in each Regional Hospital has already been set \nup under the supervision of Emergency Physicians; \n• \nthe Kidney and Renal Transplant Unit at Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital has already \nbeen operationalised; \n• \na Bone Marrow Transplant Unit will also be operational once the set-up is ready; \n• \nInterventional Cardiology Services have been extended to Rose Belle Hospital; \n• \nthe Vascular Surgery Unit at Flacq Hospital is already operational; \n• \nthe New Eye Hospital at Moka is already providing significant ophthalmological \ncare to patients, and \n• \nSpecialised Ophthalmology Services have been decentralised to Flacq and \nSouillac hospitals. \nOther major projects in the pipeline include – \n• \nthe construction of an AYUSH Centre of Excellence at Côte d’Or to promote and \ndevelop traditional systems of medicine, and \n• \nthe construction of a new SSRN Hospital aimed at modernising and expanding \nthe Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam National Hospital to strengthen healthcare \ninfrastructure. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have to emphasise that my Ministry is also having recourse \nto the services of foreign doctors from United Kingdom, Australia, India and South Africa to \nassist us in complex super specialised surgeries. These experts are specialised in the fields of \nVascular Surgery, Ophthalmology, Neurosurgery, Interventional Radiology, Renal Transplant, \nENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Oncosurgery amongst others. Such foreign visits also offer a \ngolden opportunity for our local doctors to keep abreast with modern techniques and care \nmanagement already in place in advanced countries.  \nFrom November 2024 to date, 84 specialised foreign doctors came to Mauritius to \nundertake complex surgeries such as in fields of Ophthalmology, Orthopaedics, Renal as well \nas Cardiac and Vascular Surgeries. In fact, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, at present there is an \nOnco-surgeon from Apollo Hospital, India, who is conducting complex surgeries at the \nNational Cancer Centre. \nDiagnostic and emergency healthcare services are also being strengthened through the \nexpansion and upgrading of CT scan and MRI facilities across public hospitals, including \nongoing procurement and installation of additional imaging equipment at key institutions \nsuch as Flacq Hospital, Rose Belle Hospital and Victoria Hospital. A PET scan is operational \nat the National Cancer Centre, Phoenix. \nA national programme is being implemented for the replacement and modernisation of \nageing radiology equipment, while efforts are underway to enhance equitable access through \nthe establishment of CT scan and MRI services in underserved regions, including the Flacq \nand southern regions. In parallel, SAMU capacity is being reinforced through expansion of \nambulance fleet to strengthen both emergency response and inter-hospital patient transfers. \nDuring this Financial Year, four additional SAMU ambulances have been procured. \nThe Deputy Speaker: You got a lot to go? You can circulate. \nMr Bachoo: I am concluding now. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Conclude. \nMr Bachoo: Because the question was such, it requires a lengthy answer. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, but if it is a long answer, we can always circulate it.  \nMr Bachoo: Only one or two minutes. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, carry on. \nMr Bachoo: So, during this Financial Year, four additional ambulances have been \nprocured and my Ministry will procure some additional ambulances during the next Financial \nYear. A comprehensive set of measures is also being implemented to strengthen sexual and \nreproductive health services across the continuum of care. These include – \n• \nStrengthening maternal and newborn care; \n• \nExpanding family planning and fertility services including adolescent and youth \nfriendly health services; \n• \nReinforcing sexually transmitted infections, and HIV prevention, and \n• \nEnhancing women cancer screening services. \nIn addition, the services of a fertility expert from India have been enlisted and will be \nprovided at the SSRN Hospital.  \nMy Ministry is also reinforcing a comprehensive harm reduction strategy as part of its \npublic health response. In parallel, needle and syringe programmes, addiction treatment \nservices and residential rehabilitation facilities are being strengthened through the drug users \nand administrative panel to support rehabilitation and integration.  \nMy Ministry is further transferring the human resource capacity in the health sector. \nSome 138 trainee nurses will join the nursing cadre in June 2026 upon completion of the \ntraining. The scheme of service has been amended to allow direct recruitment of qualified \nnursing officers and 1000 additional nurses are being trained over the next three years. \nSince September 2025, 139 medical and health officers have been recruited including \n106 with the Public Service Commission and 33 on contractual basis. In addition, 14 \nspecialist and senior specialist have been recruited since July 2025 in the fields such as \northopaedic, urology, obstetrics and gynaecology and paediatrics. These specialists will also \ninclude emergency physician who will service the trauma and emergency unit in each of the \nfive regional hospitals. \n  Through continuous investment across infrastructure services and human resources \nand through a balanced approach encompassing prevention, treatment and rehabilitation and \nspecialised care, Government is progressively strengthening the capacity of our public health \nsystem to meet the evolving needs of the population. This strategy is ultimately aimed at \nensuring the equitable access to quality health care locally, improving health outcome for all \ncitizens and reducing dependence on overseas medical treatment in a structured and \nsustainable manner. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member. \nMr Baboolall: Yes, thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. I thank the hon. Minister for \nhis answer. As rightly pointed out by the hon. Minister, diagnostic is very important. Is he \naware that the MRI, City Scan at National Cancer Centre and Candos hospital are not \nworking properly and this is causing serious issues to the patients and appointment are being \ngiven in December 2026? \nMr Bachoo: Well, I am made aware that at the cancer hospital, there has been a slight \nproblem but that has already been looked into but I would like to add up that the last 10 years, \nmuch investment was not made in that equipment and that is the reason why this situation. \nFor example, in Victoria it must be above 10 years old and repeated breakdowns do occur but \nwe have taken the decision probably in the forthcoming budget, we have to change. We are \ngoing to have one additional MRI, a new MRI to be set up in Victoria Hospital. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue! \nBOIS PIGNOLET – WATER LEAKAGE – REMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/538",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 538,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/538) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the recent \nwater leakage along the main road at Bois Pignolet, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to the causes thereof, indicating \nwhen same will be remedied.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: M. le président, la CWA m'informe que la région de Bois Pignolet, \nsituée dans la circonscription No. 4 – Port Louis Nord et Montagne Longue, compte un total \nde 836 abonnés. \nLa conduite de distribution principale le long de la route principale de Bois Pignolet est \nconstituée d'un vieux tuyau en amiante-ciment de 100 mm, sujet à des ruptures fréquentes en \nraison de son âge, de son état, provoquant ainsi des fuites. Suite à plusieurs plaintes, la \nCentral Water Authority a récemment traité trois fuites importantes détectées sur la conduite \nde distribution principale. Deux autres fuites mineures ont également été détectées et seront \nréparées d'ici fin avril, donc si c’est réparé ou sera réparé dans les jours à venir 2026. \nM. le président, j'ai également été informé par la CWA que dans le but d'améliorer la \nfiabilité de l'approvisionnement en eau dans la région à long terme, environ 1.2 km de tuyau \nle long de la route principale de Bois Pignolet sera remplacé dans le cadre de la phase 2 du \nprogramme de remplacement des tuyaux, financé par la ligne de crédit indienne, les R 1.2 \nmilliard que nous avons reçues de l’État indien. \nDonc, l’attribution du contrat pour les travaux de remplacement des tuyaux est prévue \npour septembre de cette année-ci. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Member. \nMr Caserne: Merci, M. le président. Je remercie l’honorable ministre pour sa réponse. \nJuste pour lui dire que la situation cause pas mal d’inconvénients à toutes ces abonnés, ces \nhabitants de Bois Pignolet. Ma question est, est-ce qu’il peut transmettre le message au \nniveau de la CWA pour que ces fuites où il n’y a pas mal de perdition actuellement puissent \nêtre réparées dans un délai assez rapidement pour soulager la situation actuelle au niveau de \nBois Pignolet ? Merci. \nMr Assirvaden: M. le président, je note et je transmettrais mais je dois dire aussi que \nces tuyaux en amiante-ciment, des tuyaux datant plus de 60 ans donc, c’est difficile. Si nous \nmettons, je l’ai dit l’autre jour, si nous mettons trop de pression dans les lignes, les tuyaux \ns’effritent, se cassent. Si nous ne mettons pas suffisamment de pression dans les tuyaux, \ncertaines personnes en hauteur n’arrivent pas à avoir l’eau. Donc, c’est pour cette raison que \nnous sommes obligés d’envoyer des camions citernes. \nDonc, je vais transmettre mais j’ai appris – j’ai posé la question moi aussi pour \ndemander pourquoi on ne répare pas.  Nous préférons réparer les grosses fuites et laisser pour \nun petit peu plus tard les autres petites fuites. Donc, nous sommes un peut divisés en ce qui \nconcerne la réparation car il n’y a pas mal de fuites dans cette région. Donc nous espérons \ntrès vite remplacer ces tuyaux avec l’aide indienne et je suis sûre que la situation va \ns’améliorer. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d’Or! \nMAURITIUS TELECOM – E-BILLING SYSTEM – SETTLEMENT DELAYS – \nPENALTIES WAIVERS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/539",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 539,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation",
      "question": "(No. B/539) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand' Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Minister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation whether, in regard to \nthe e-billing system implemented by Mauritius Telecom, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain information as to whether consideration will be given for the waiver of the penalties \nincurred by subscribers of Internet and fixed line services, in particular, senior citizens, for \ndelays in the settlement of their bills on account of having no access thereto.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ramtohul: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to thank the hon. Member for the \nquestion. I am informed that Mauritius Telecom has introduced e-billing as part of its green \ninitiatives. This implies that customers can receive their bill in electronic forms instead of \npaper or by e-mail or SMS. Enabling e-billing for mobile prepay, post-paid services and fixed \ntelephony were implemented in 2021 and 2022 and I am further informed that e-billing is \nbeing implemented across fixed and mobile services. \nCustomers who do not have access to email may actually opt for SMS e-bill while \npaper bills remain available on request and can be collected free of charge at the outlets. \nAssistance is also being given to customers through hotline over and above the outlets, \noffering options such as SMS notifications as we just mentioned, especially for elderly and \nvulnerable because we know they are constrained.  \nToday, 82% of customers receive their bills electronically. Other remaining customers \nincluding businesses and certain Government services still receive their paper bills. \nIn fact, since 2022 there have been 3540 complaints with regard to our bills around \nfixed line services. However, these customers prefer paper bills and those requests have been \naddressed.  \nI am also informed that there are no recorded cases where customers were penalised \nand this is a substantive part of the question, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, because there is \nquestion on whether they have been penalised. So, they have not been penalised. In fact, \ncustomers are given 30 days to pay their bills and a penalty of 10% can be applied. \n However, for request for waiving, Mauritius Telecom is giving due consideration to \ncertain requests. In cases which are genuine, the requests are being acceded to and further \ninformation, I am sure will provide suggestions to Mauritius Telecom because they have an \nindependent board for them to make information available with regard to the vulnerable and \nthe old people. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, you have a supplementary?  \nMr Beejan: Thank you. Yes, thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Will the hon. Minister \npropose a procedure to apply for a waiver on retroactive basis especially for the senior \ncitizens and vulnerable persons? \nDr. Ramtohul: Yes, thank you for this supplementary question hon. Member. We will \ncertainly convey this message to the board of Mauritius Telecom for them to give effect to the \nrequest. Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. The hon. Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil! \nCULTURAL DESK – ONE-STOP SHOP – SETTING UP",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/540",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 540,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "(No. B/540) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked \nthe Minister of Arts and Culture whether, in regard to the proposed setting up of a cultural \ndesk that would act as a one-stop shop for concert organisers and artists, he will state where \nmatters stand.",
      "answer": "Mr Gondeea: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in regard to the proposed setting up of a \ncultural desk that would act as one-stop-shop for concert organisers and artists, I wish to \ninform the House that this project is a key measure set out in the Government Programme \n2025-2029, and it is a priority for Government. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, since taking office, I have ensured that substantial progress \nhas been made towards the implementation of this project. The cultural desk is being \ndeveloped by my Ministry with the technical support of the Economic Development Board, \nusing the National Electronic Licensing System as its digital backbone. \nI am pleased to inform the House that a mock-up of the online platform has already \nbeen developed and will be finalised after addressing some challenges identified during this \nexercise. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is important to underline that this project is a complex and \nmulti-layered exercise. It requires the integration and collaboration of a wide range of \nstakeholders across ministries, departments and institutions, including the Police Department, \nlocal authorities, the Mauritius Fire and Rescue Services, the Ministry of Health and \nWellness, the Tourism Authority, the Beach Authority, the Ministry of Labour and Industrial \nRelations, the Mauritius Sports Council, the Mauritius Society of Authors and Mauritius \nMultisports Infrastructure Ltd. \nAt present, the system governing the organisation of concert is highly fragmented. \nEvent organisers are required to obtain up to 15 clearances from multiple institutions for \nmanual processes and physical submissions. In case of incomplete applications, organisers \nare required to restart the process, thereby creating delays and placing an additional burden \non artists. This has, over time, discouraged many operators in the sector and constrained the \norganisation of cultural events. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in order to ensure that the cultural desk effectively addresses \nthese shortcomings, extensive consultations had to be carried out with all stakeholders \nconcerned. I am informed that around 12 meetings have been held both at the level of my \nMinistry and by the Economic Development Board in addition to several one-to-one technical \nsessions with individual stakeholders to map out their respective procedures, requirements \nand constraints. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, these consultations have brought to light a number of systemic \nissues which have to be resolved prior to finalisation of the system. These include significant \ndivergence in processing timeline across institutions with some clearances being issued \nwithin a few days while others may take up to 30 days. \nIn addition, there are inconsistencies in payment procedures with certain institutions \nrequiring payment prior to the issuance of clearances while other process payments \nafterwards. Such disparities, if not addressed, would undermine the objective of creating a \nstreamline and user-friendly one-stop-shop. \nAnother constraint relates to the adoption of one line payment system. While some \ngovernment institutions are already integrated with the e-payment gateway, others continue to \nrely on manual payment processes. In this regard, my Ministry has scheduled a meeting with \nthe Accountant General Department and the Ministry of Finance, tomorrow, with a view to \nharmonising and standardising online payment mechanism across all relevant institutions. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in parallel, procedures will be harmonised, timelines \nstandardised and operational requirements aligned across institutions. The objective is to \nensure that the cultural desk does not merely replicate existing bottlenecks in digital form, but \ninstead delivers a genuinely simplified and efficient process for users. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I also wish to highlight that certain delays encountered in the \nimplementation of this project were attributable to bottlenecks at the level of the local \nauthorities where procedures differ from one authority to another and where inputs were not \nalways provided within the expected timeframe. \nUpon being apprised of this situation, I convened a meeting with my colleague, the hon. \nMinister of Local Government together with Chairpersons and Chief Executives of the local \nauthorities to address all these issues. Following this intervention, progress has improved \nsignificantly with inputs being consolidated and integrated into the system designed in \ncollaboration with the Economic Development Board. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, once finalised, the system will be presented to the artist \ncommunity for their validation as soon as possible. Thereafter, the Economic Development \nBoard will conduct training sessions for artists and event organisers to ensure that they are \nfully equipped to use the platform effectively. \nAt the level of my Ministry, officers will be specifically assigned to the culture desk. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Minister, do you have a lot to go? Because time is nearly \nover. \nMr Gondeea: Nearly 50 seconds. \nAt the level of my Ministry, officers will be specifically assigned to the culture desk to \nensure that the system remains fully functional and operational and to provide direct \nassistance to artists in case of any problems for the electronic filling of application on the \nplatform. \nLet me be very clear: this reform is long overdue. For years, artists and event organisers \nhave been calling for a one-stop-shop to facilitate the organisation of cultural events. Their \nappeals were not adequately addressed by the previous government. On the contrary, the \nprocess became increasingly restrictive with authorisation for public concert, often difficult to \nobtain. Thereby, adversely affecting livelihood across the creative sector. \nThis Government has taken a deliberate and firm decision to change that. We are \nputting in place in modern, transparent and efficient system that will remove unnecessary \nbarriers, restore confidence and enable our artists and cultural entrepreneurs to fully express \ntheir talent and contribute to the growth of our creative economy. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry remains fully committed to ensuring that the \ncultural desk becomes a truly facilitative, user-friendly and transformative tool for the \ncultural sector. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Time is over!  \nThe Table has been advised that the following PQs have been withdrawn: B/542, \nB/544, B/545, B/547, B/550, B/553, B/554, B/556, B/557, B/559, B/560, B/561, and B/562. \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Deputy Speaker:  Hon. Prime Minister! \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I beg to move that all the business on \ntoday’s Order Paper be exempted from the provisions of paragraph (2) of Standing Order 10. \nMr Mohamed rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \n \n \nSTATEMENT BY MINISTER \n(4.18 p.m.) \nCHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO – AGREEMENT – LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS \nThe Prime Minister: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with your permission, I would like to \nmake a Statement on the Chagos Archipelago.  \nIn my reply to the Private Notice Question of last Tuesday, 21 April 2026, I referred to \nthe decision of the UK Government not to proceed in the House of Lords with the Bill titled \n“Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill”, which it had \nintroduced with a view to ratifying the agreement between Mauritius and the United \nKingdom concerning the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia.  \nI wish to keep the House informed of further developments.  \nOn 22 April 2026, I received a phone call from Mr Jonathan Powell, the UK Prime \nMinister’s National Security Adviser, who reiterated the commitment of the United Kingdom \nto the Agreement on the Chagos Archipelago despite this decision of the UK Government. I \nexplained to Mr Powell that my Government would in due course review the situation and \ntake a decision on the way forward accordingly. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as I said in my reply to the PNQ on the 21 April 2026, officials \nfrom the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office were coming to visit \nMauritius that very week.  \nMr Robbie Bulloch, Director of Overseas Territories and Polar Directorate at the UK \nForeign, Commonwealth and Development Office together with the Lead Negotiator, Mr \nPeter Candler, Mr Paul McKell, the Legal Director of that department came to Mauritius last \nweek at the request of the UK Government.  They held talks on 22 April 2026 with the \nAttorney General and the officers of his Office and my Office.  \nThey also called upon me on 22 April 2026. \nDuring the talks, the United Kingdom highlighted that the signature of an updated UK-\nUS Exchange of Notes in respect of the military base in Diego Garcia is a prerequisite for the \n“Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill” to be taken forward in \nthe UK Parliament. The United Kingdom indicated that while an updated Exchange of Notes \nhad been agreed by the US agencies, it had not yet obtained the approval of the US President \nand could not therefore be signed. The United Kingdom assured Mauritius that it remains \ncommitted to the Agreement which it had signed with Mauritius on the Chagos Archipelago.  \nThe United Kingdom informed Mauritius that once the updated Exchange of Notes \nwould be signed by the United Kingdom and the United States, the “Diego Garcia Military \nBase and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill” would again be introduced in the UK \nParliament. \nMauritius underscored that it would not be able to wait for too long for the ratification \nof the agreement on the Chagos Archipelago by the United Kingdom. We indicated that we \nwould have in due course to review the situation and decide on the way forward.  \nIt was agreed that Mauritius and the United Kingdom would hold a virtual meeting in \none month’s time, that is, towards the end of May of this year in order to take stock of \ndevelopments. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the United Kingdom has agreed that pending the ratification of \nthe Agreement on the Chagos Archipelago, the following actions could be taken – \n(a) \norganisation of a heritage visit for the Chagossians to the Chagos Archipelago in \nline with a request made by Mr Olivier Bancoult and other Chagossians for a visit \nin a letter they had addressed to me earlier; \n(b) \na formal delegation of the Chagossian community would be allowed to visit the \nUK and to engage with MPs and other organisations as well as the UK Press to \nput forward the views of the original native Chagossians to correct the deliberate \nmisinformation being propagated by some Chagossians living in the UK; \n(c) \nparticipation of Mauritian scientists in the annual expedition of the UK’s Chief \nScientific Adviser to the Chagos Archipelago and the rat eradication expedition to \nPeros Banhos; \n(d) \nvisit of a UK delegation to Mauritius to undertake a maritime security capability \nneeds assessment; \n(e) \nfollow up to the workshop on the Chagos Archipelago Marine Protected Area \norganised by the Department for Continental Shelf, Maritime Zones \nAdministration and Exploration of my Office from 30 March to 01 April 2026 in \ncollaboration with the Zoological Society of London and with the support of the \nBritish High Commission; \n(f) \ncompletion of work on outstanding issues relating to the implementation of the \nagreement between Mauritius and the United Kingdom on the Chagos \nArchipelago, and \n(g) \nimplementation of further actions under the Strategic Partnership Framework \nwhich Mauritius and the United Kingdom signed on 22 May 2025. \nThank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you, hon. Prime Minister. \nPUBLIC BILL \nSecond Reading  \nTHE CERTIFICATE OF CHARACTER BILL  \n(No. II of 2026) \nOrder read for resuming adjourned debate on the Second Reading of the Certificate of \nCharacter Bill (No. II of 2026).  \nQuestion again proposed. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle! \n \n(4.24 p.m.) \nMr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle): Merci, M. le \nprésident.  \nM. le président, d'abord, permettez-moi de commencer par féliciter l'honorable Attorney \nGeneral pour avoir présenté devant cette auguste Assemblée ce projet de loi : le Certificate of \nCharacter Bill No. II de 2026. Un projet de loi, M. le président, qui à première vue peut \nparaître tout simple et sans histoires. Mais, un projet de loi qui en réalité, poursuit un objectif \nfondamental. Un objectif fondamental, car il s'agit d'abord de réduire les obstacles à l'emploi \nque font face les citoyens ayant déjà été condamnés par une cour de justice. Mais non \nseulement de promouvoir la réintégration, mais aussi la réinsertion des citoyens qui ont été \ncondamnés par une cour de justice.  \nM. le président, en parcourant ce projet de loi, en fait, je ne peux m'empêcher de \nconstater – je me réjouis même en fait – que ce projet de loi s'inscrit pleinement dans la \nphilosophie de ce gouvernement. Ce projet de loi en fait, M. le président, s'inscrit pleinement \ndans la mission même de ce gouvernement. Et en préparant mon discours pour aujourd'hui, \nen fait, j'ai pris le soin de parcourir un petit peu le Government Programme, le document qui \na été lu par son Excellence le président de la République en janvier de l'année dernière et je \nvais me permettre, allow me, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, to quote a very short extract of this \ndocument which is at page 21, paragraph 44 of the Government Programme 2025-2029. I \nquote – \n“It is the conviction of Government that our country needs a social pact to reimagine \nour future together as one people, as one nation.  \nGovernment aims at a qualitative leap towards a more inclusive society, where the \nneeds, rights, dignity and a sense of humanism of our people shape the social system of \nthe Republic.” \nAnd the last bit, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the most important one – \n “Fundamental reforms will be brought to the outdated social security and social \nintegration operational system of the country.” \nM. le président, this Bill, in fact, ce projet de loi, the Certificate of Character Bill, in my \nvery humble view, is in fact a concrete step precisely in this direction. En réalité, M. le \nprésident, ce projet de loi vise à renforcer des provisions déjà existantes, des provisions qui \nexistent déjà dans nos lois, notamment le Equal Opportunities Act. Effectivement, j'ai eu \nl'occasion de parcourir un petit peu le Equal Opportunities Act et on peut voir sous la section \n3, the definition section, that the term ‘criminal record’ already exists within the definition of \n‘status’ in section 3 of the Equal Opportunities Act.  This piece of legislation, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir, the Equal Opportunities Act 2008, already prohibits discrimination by \nemployers, especially where the offence is not relevant to the nature of the job which is being \ncontemplated by a prospective employer or by an existing employee.  \nNow, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as I said, in fact, under the Equal Opportunities Act, \nthere may already be existing laws and in fact, it is precisely to be found under section 10 and \n11 of the Equal Opportunities Act. But that being said, whilst there may be already laws \nexisting under the Equal Opportunities Act, as I said, sections 10 and 11, on ne peut que \nconstater, M. le président, that the reality on the ground tells us a completely different story. \nAnd, in fact, as a practicing barrister, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have seen a growing trend for \nemployers to systematically ask for potential employees to provide them with a character \ncertificate in this recruitment process. In fact, we have seen very recently, there has been a \nmassive recruitment process in the LGSC and we all know that all these candidates, for the \npost of scavenger, have been requested to provide character certificates. Et comme moi, je \nsuis sûr que beaucoup de mes collègues ont été approchés par ceux qui ont été recrutés, par \ncertains, bien sûr, qui ont été choisis pour nous dire que malheureusement, ils ont un \nantécédent. And regrettably, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, they will be excluded. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as I said, whilst this practice of asking for Certificates of \nCharacter, in fact, I am not too sure myself if it fully complies with data minimisation \nprinciple under the Data Protection Act. That is itself debatable but one thing is sure, Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, let us be frank and conceit, no applicant for a job can possibly envisage \nthe possibility of challenging this request by a prospective employer to provide a Certificate \nof Character. We know how cumbersome this can be in terms of the procedure to fight a case \nbefore a court of law, etc. So, they simply comply, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. They submit, and \ntoo often, they are excluded. \nDonc, M. le président, sous l’actuel système, sous l’actuelle loi, les sections 10 et 11 de \nl’Equal Opportunites Act, nous faisons face, ici, à une contradiction fondamentale. D’une \npart, nous avons d’un côté l’employeur qui peut demander aux employés potentiels de fournir \nun certificat de moralité et d’autre part, la loi telle qu’elle existe, nous dit que ce potentiel \nemployeur ne peut pas discriminer sur cette base. \nBut then, again, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, how does the applicant go about proving \ndiscrimination? How does he show that the decision of the employer to reject his application \nwas due to his criminal record, when he has no visibility or whatsoever on the recruitment \nprocess? Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in reality, the existing provisions under section 10 and \nsection 11 of the Equal Opportunities Act, in fact, become more theoretical than practical.  \nC’est précisément là, M. le président, que ce projet de loi intervient. Quand nous \nparcourons ce projet de loi, justement la clause 4 du projet de loi, M. le président, goes \nfurther. In fact, clause 4 of the Bill makes it now clear that an employer shall not act on \ncriminal record and shall not discriminate an employee or a prospective employee as the case \nmay be, where the criminal record is not related to the employment. \nNow, one may argue, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that this is just a repetition of the \nexisting laws. I am afraid no, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. This is not just a reinstatement of the \nlaw. It is not just a reinstatement of sections 10 and 11 of the Equal Opportunities Act. \nInstead, it constitutes the introduction of an enforceable protection in our laws, which may \nnow be invoked by employees and potential employees. Ceux qui se sentent lésés, M. le \nprésident. \nEn fait, quand nous regardons encore une fois ce projet de loi, clause 12 vient justement \napporter un consequential amendment. If we look at clause 12, it brings a consequential \namendment à la section 10, justement, de l’Equal Opportunites Act dans le but, précisément, \nd’aligner le cadre légal afin de garantir, à la fois, une cohérence mais aussi, M. le président, \nune efficacité plus accrue. \nDonc, M. le président, on peut dire que ce projet de loi, le Certificate of Character Bill \nva encore plus loin. Il réaffirme une vision essentielle de notre système de justice pénale, à la \nfois un système de justice pénale rétributif parce qu’il est impératif, bien évidemment, que \ntout système pénal soit rétributif, mais plus important que tout, faudrait-il encore que ce \nsystème soit un système qui préconise une justice restauratrice. This is precisely the purpose \nof this Bill, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. A system that does not only punish, but a system that \nalso rehabilitates. A system that also reintegrates, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I once read that the greatest glory of man is not in his never \nfalling, but in rising every time he falls. When we look at the content of this Bill, the \nCertificate of Character Bill, it is precisely what this Bill brings about. It gives a real meaning \nto these words: that the greatest glory of man is not in his never falling, but in rising every \ntime he falls – precisely, the purpose of this Bill. A second chance – to provide a conducive \nenvironment for those who have failed, not to fail again but to be provided with a second \nchance to succeed. An opportunity, in fact, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, to rise again. After all, \nwhat is the purpose, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, of a criminal justice system if it is not to allow a \nperson – after accountability of course – to stand up again, to work, to contribute to society? \nAs we would say, d’apporter sa pierre à l’édifice, M. le président. \nDans la même foulée, M. le président, ce projet de loi, plus particulièrement la clause 5, \nnous apporte des réponses concrètes. Des paramètres tangibles, notamment comme je l’ai dit \nsous la clause 5, qui préconisent une augmentation du seuil des amendes qui passent \nmaintenant de R 5 000 à R 50 000 et une réduction du délai qui passe maintenant de 5 ans à 2 \nans. Un chiffre beaucoup plus juste, M. le président, et qui reflète la réalité – the exigencies of \nthe Mauritian society. \nIn fact, the combined effect of what is sought to be attained under this Bill, is \nabundantly clear, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Under this Bill, a minor offence cannot, should not \nand will not follow a person for life. In fact, after a reasonable period of time, the person \nought to be able to move forward, without being permanently defined by his past. \nM. le président, nous ne pouvons maintenir un système où un citoyen de ce pays est \nvictime de son passé. Comme dit le français, M. le président, le passé est un cadavre qu’il \nfaut enterrer mais, il peut néanmoins nous servir d’exemple afin de mieux bâtir l’avenir et \nc’est justement ce que préconise ce projet de loi. Il est essentiel, ici, de souligner que ce seuil \ns’applique, non seulement à l’amende qui est imposée puisque la clause en question prévoit \nune amende à la hauteur de R 50 000. Il est important, ici, de préciser que ce seuil s’applique \nà l’amende qui est réellement infligée, c’est-à-dire bien qu’une offense puisse prévoir une \npeine maximale de R 500 000, ce qui sera pris en considération, c’est l’amende qui sera \nimposée par une cour de justice, et cela, garantissant, M. le président, non seulement une \nappréciation plus juste, mais aussi plus individualisée par la cour. \nM. le président, je tiens aussi à saluer une disposition particulièrement importante, mais \naussi particulièrement avant-gardiste de ce projet de loi – la clause 5 (g). Celle qui prévoit, \nM. le président, qu’aucune condamnation ne figurera sur un certificat de moralité lorsque \nl’infraction a été commise avant l’âge de 18 ans, bien sûr, sauf pour les infractions plus \ngraves qui sont prévues sous le First Schedule. Et, là, je me réjouis de l’annonce qui a été \nfaite par l’honorable Attorney General la semaine dernière, qui avait revu justement à la \nbaisse la liste d’offenses figurant sur le First Schedule, que nous accueillons justement.  \nDonc, cette provision, M. le président, sous la clause 5 (g), qu’aucune condamnation, \ncomme je dis, ne figurera sur un certificat de moralité lorsque l’infraction a été commise \navant l’âge de 18 ans. This in itself, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, comprises a very powerful and \nnecessary safeguard. Parce que nous devons justement reconnaitre une réalité très simple, M. \nle président, nous faisons tous des erreurs, les jeunes en particulier. Les jeunes font tous des \nerreurs. Qui peut prétendre ici n’avoir jamais commis d’erreurs de jeunesse ?  \nNous faisons tous des erreurs, M. le président mais ce qui est le plus important, \nl’essentiel en fait, c’est que ces erreurs ne doivent en aucun cas devenir une condamnation à \nvie. Je vois le regard amusant et amusé de mon camarade, mon collègue l’honorable \nBeechook qui en dit long, M. le président. \nA mistake in youth, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, should not close the door to a future in \nadulthood. C’est précisément ce que préconise cette section, la clause 5 (g), que j’accueille \nfavorablement, M. le président. \nThe Deputy Speaker: You have two minutes to go! \nMr Ramdass: M. le président, avant de terminer, sur une autre note, j’aimerai bien \nfaire état d’une situation. Pas plus tard que la semaine dernière, j’avais adressé une question à \nl’honorable Dr. Arvin Boolell par rapport à la situation des pêcheurs de ma circonscription, a \nquestion which unfortunately could not be reached due to time constraints. Et pas plus tard \nque la semaine dernière, j’avais adressé cette question justement par rapport à la situation des \npêcheurs de ma circonscription et à travers l’île, qui sont contraints de produire un certificat \nde moralité afin de se procurer d’une carte, a fisherman card, qui est émise par le ministère. \nThe Deputy Speaker: You have one minute to go! \nMr Ramdass: Yes.  \nDonc, ces pêcheurs, M. le président, sont des gens simples, des gens honnêtes, des gens \nqui travaillent, qui ont les mêmes aspirations que nous tous, de gagner leur vie et de subvenir \naux besoins de leur famille. Et ces pêcheurs, M. le président, il n'est pas rare, il n'est pas \ninhabituel qu'ils aient, à un moment ou un autre de leur vie, qu'ils aient eu une condamnation \npour une infraction simple.  \nM. le président, ne serait-ce pas absurde ? Ne serait-il pas injuste qu’un pêcheur \ncondamné pour un simple cas de larcin, un simple cas de simple larceny, de simple assault \nsoit lésé, soit privé de sa carte de pêcheur uniquement pour cette raison ? Évidemment, sa \ncarte de pêcheur et tous les bénéfices, tous les avantages qui y sont liés.  \nDonc, M. le président, vous conviendrez certainement qu'une personne comme lui, qui \nessaie de gagner sa vie, ne représente absolument aucun danger pour la sécurité maritime et \naucun danger pour la sécurité des citoyens de ce pays. Avons-nous, M. le président, le droit \nmoral de réellement priver un homme ou une femme dans cette situation de son gagne-pain \npour cette raison ? La réponse est non, M. le président. That would be most unfair. Not only \nmost unfair, but also most unreasonable. Et c'est précisément ce type d'injustice que ce projet \nde loi, je l'espère, M. le président, nous permettra de corriger. \nM. le président, pour conclure, for too long, our system has not only punished \nwrongdoings, but it has prolonged that punishment way beyond what justice requires. It has \nfollowed people into job interviews, into opportunities, into application for a fisherman's \ncard, into application for a PSV license, into applications even for registration of an ONG. \nBref, into one's desperate attempts, desperate and legitimate attempts, to rebuild his life after \na failure.  \nM. le président, en guise de conclusion, je dirais ceci : ce projet de loi n'est pas \nsimplement une réforme technique. It's a statement of principle. A reflection of the philosophy \nof this government. A reflection of the social policy of this government. That justice must be \nfair. That punishment must be proportionate. That every citizen of this country deserves a \nchance, a second chance. This is precisely, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, why I support this bill. \nThank you very much. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you. I suspend the Sitting for half an hour. \nAt 4.41 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.36 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: Please be seated! \nHon. Dr. Prayag, I think it’s your turn. The floor is yours! \n(5.36 p.m.) \nDr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart): Thank you, Madam \nSpeaker, for giving me this opportunity to intervene on the Certificate of Character Bill.  \nI would like to start by commending the hon. Attorney General for bringing forward \nthis piece of legislation. The Certificate of Character Bill (No. II of 2026), which proposes to \nrepeal the 2012 Act and introduce an improved framework more than a decade later. I am not \nsuggesting that the Certificate of Character Act 2012 was not in itself a significant \nimprovement. What I am saying is that this new legislation comes at the right moment in our \nhistory and is well positioned to address the realities of a new era.  \nBy this new era, I refer to, firstly, the post-COVID period, where some of our citizens \nhave been convicted for offenses, such as failing to comply with curfew orders under the \nPublic Health Act, which in some cases, simply meant not wearing a face mask during \ncurfew.  \nSecondly, a labour market is increasingly characterised by competition, including from \nexpatriates, sometimes to the detriment of our fellow citizens who may be denied \nemployment opportunities due to minor offences reflected on their certificates of character. \nThirdly, a context in which fines and penalties have significantly increased in recent \nyears, resulting in a greater number of convictions being recorded and subsequently \nappearing on certificates of character.  \nMadam Speaker, the certificate of character remains in certain sectors an important \nadministrative and regulatory instrument. It is used to assess suitability for employment, \nlicensing and other positions of trust. I fully recognise that in such context, background \nverification serves a legitimate purpose in safeguarding public interest.  \nHowever, the issue before us is not its existence, but rather the manner in which the \nsystem operates. As a medical practitioner, my intervention on this Bill focuses primarily on \nits social, rehabilitative and psychological dimensions. This legislation will bring many \npositive changes. It reflects the same philosophy that guided the Legal Aid and Legal \nAssistance Act of 2025, that is, facilitating access to justice.  \nThis new Certificate of Character Bill will reduce barriers to employment and promotes \nthe social reintegration of persons who have been convicted of offences. It reflects the \nmaturity of our country. I believe that bringing forward such legislation was long overdue.  \nMadam Speaker, in jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom, mechanisms exist \nwhereby after a defined period, often around five years, depending on the nature of the \noffence, certain convictions are no longer disclosed.  \nThis allows individuals, particularly those involved in minor offences, to reintegrate \ninto society without being permanently penalised. The introduction of this Bill demonstrates \nour willingness to align with such progressive approaches. In the past, many individuals felt \ncompelled to plead guilty to offences, often due to financial constraints or simply to bring \nmatters to an end.  \nHowever, it is important to note that this legislation complements the Legal Aid and \nLegal Assistance Act 2025. With improved access to legal representations, individuals are \nnow better equipped to contest charges rather than opting for expedient guilty pleas without \nfully understanding the implications. This Bill introduces, for the first time, a structured \napproach to recognising rehabilitation. The knowledge that, after a certain period, one may \nobtain a Certificate of Character free from past convictions, can act as an incentive for \nbehavioural reform. Conversely, a system that imposes a lifelong stigma may discourage \nindividuals from attempting to improve their circumstances, thereby undermining the very \nobjective of rehabilitation. \n In its previous form, the system was rigid. It did not adequately take into account the \nage at which the offence was committed, the time elapsed since the conviction, or the \nsubsequent conduct of the individual. The lack of differentiation led, in certain cases, to \ndisproportionate outcomes. We have seen situations where individuals at teenage or pre-\nuniversity age entered guilty pleas, often without the benefit of proper legal advice, and \nwithout a full understanding of its long-term implications. These entries remained on record \nand were reflected in certificates of character, thereby creating barriers to employment, \neducation, and social reintegration. Clause 5(g) of this Bill is therefore a very important \nprovision as it offers a second chance to many individuals who committed offences under the \nage of 18.  \nMadam Speaker, we must agree that this Bill raises a fundamental issue of \nproportionality and rehabilitation within our system. It is therefore my considered view that \nthe framework could be further strengthened through the introduction of a structured review \nmechanism. I propose the setting up of a dedicated committee or even consideration of the \nCommission on the Prerogative of Mercy to be empowered with clearly defined statutory \nauthority to review rehabilitation processes and examine specific cases upon application, \nparticularly in relation to certain offences under Schedule One.  \nSuch a body could be mandated to assess the age of the individual at the time of the \noffence, the nature of the seriousness of the offence, the time elapsed since the conviction or \nthe entry, the existence of any subsequent offences, and lastly, evidence of rehabilitation, \nincluding employment, education, or community engagement. Based on these criteria, the \nbody should be empowered to determine whether certain entries may be expunged, filtered, \nor withheld from disclosure in defined circumstances. Madam Speaker, I may be considered \nbold in stating that Section 10(f) of the existing Equal Opportunities Act appears less \npermissive than the proposed Clause 12.  \nThe consequential amendment under this Bill, in as much as the new formulation, may \nconfer broader discretion upon employers. The shift in wording from ‘irrelevant to the nature \nof employment’ to ‘related to his employment’, may in practice widen the scope for \nsubjective interpretation. \nI would, therefore, propose that the word ‘directly’ be inserted before ‘related’ so that \nthe provision reads ‘directly related to his employment’, thereby limiting the risk of misuse \nby employers acting in bad faith. We must ensure that individuals are not unfairly \ndiscriminated against on the basis of past convictions.  \nMadam Speaker, I also wish to address Clause 9 relating to offences and proceedings \nwhich provides that any person who tampers with, forges or fraudulently alters a Certificate \nof Character shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding Rs50,000 or to \nimprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.  \nIn my view, this penalty may not be sufficiently dissuasive, particularly when \nconsidered against the backdrop of increased threshold in other offences where fines have \nbeen raised to Rs50,000 from Rs5,000 and imprisonment terms extended up to five years. \nThis is an aspect that may warrant reconsideration. The introduction of a review mechanism \nas proposed would not weaken the system. On the contrary, it would enhance its credibility \nby ensuring that outcomes are proportionate, evidence-based, and aligned with modern \npractices of justice. We must ensure that our legislative framework evolves in a manner that \nsafeguards society while also recognising that individuals who have genuinely reformed \nshould not be subjected to indefinite consequences.  \nIt is in that spirit that I support this Bill and with these words, Madam Speaker, I \ncommend this Bill to the House.  \nThank you. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Ramkalawon! \n(5.46 p.m.) \nMr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil): Madam Speaker, \nfellow hon. Members of this House and the citizens we serve, I would like to start with a \nquote – \n“True Morality is not found in the absence of mark on a paper but in the presence of the \nwill to improve. A certificate may document the past but it cannot measure the potential \nof the human spirit.” \nI stand before you today in this Chambre of justice to advocate for a fundamental shift \nin how we perceive potential, opportunity, and the inherent dignity of every human being. I \nrise in full support of the Certificate of Character Bill, a forward-thinking reform that seeks to \nrepeal the existing Certificate of Character Act 2012. I would like to take a sociological point \nof view rather than legal one which most of my friends have taken.  \nMadam Speaker, for too long, we have allowed a system of barriers to dictate who is \n‘worthy’, of participating in our economy and our society. We have used the lack of a \nmorality certificate, a document often rooted in historical bias or past mistakes, as a \npermanent gatekeeper. By doing so, we have inadvertently created a cycle of exclusion that \ntraps individuals who are trying to turn their lives around. This Bill is not about ignoring \naccountability. It is about recognising the capacity for change. When individuals offend, it is \nfrequently within the context of limited opportunities and social disadvantage.  \nHowever, after serving their sentence, it is both just and rational that they be given an \nopportunity to rebuild their lives. This legislation is vital for it restores dignity through work \nwhere employment is more than just a pay check. It is the bedrock of self-worth and social \nintegration. By removing the mandatory requirement of a morality certificate for \nemployment, we open doors for thousands of our fellow citizens to contribute their skills, pay \ntaxes, and support their families. \n I will further add that supporting the Bill helps break the cycle of recidivism that is \ndenying employment to those who have stumbled in the past, is a guaranteed path to further \nhardship. If we want a safer and more stable society, we must provide the pathways to honest \nwork. A person who can earn a living is a person who can build a future.  \nWhen we use a document to define a person's worth, we cease to judge them as an \nindividual and begin to judge them as a statistic. Justice demands that we look at the person \nstanding before us today, not as the ghost they were yesterday. Speaking about economic \nempowerment, our economy relies on the full participation of its people.  \nBy widening the labour pool and allowing employers to judge candidates based on their \npresent capability and character rather than a static document, we foster a more dynamic and \ninclusive marketplace. \n Madam Speaker, this Bill is about correcting an injustice done in the past. Under the \nprevious law, a fine exceeding a mere Rs5,000 could follow an individual for up to five \nyears. Let us be honest.  Rs5,000, in today's economy is no longer a meaningful indicator of \nserious wrongdoings. This government has had the clarity and the courage to act. By raising \nthe threshold to 50,000 and reducing the period to two years, we are saying loud and clear, \nminor offences should not define major portions of a person's life. That is fairness, that is \nproportionality, that is modern governance! \n Madam Speaker, from a sociological standpoint, this Bill strikes at the heart of what \nwe call structural exclusion. When individuals are denied employment because of unrelated \npast offences, we are not protecting society, but instead, we are destabilising it. We are \npushing people to the margins. We are closing doors instead of opening pathways. And let \nme say this categorically as mentioned earlier, unemployment fuels vulnerability, \nvulnerability fuels recidivism, and recidivism undermines national security.  \nThis Bill breaks that cycle by expressly prohibiting discrimination where the offence is \nnot related to the employment. This Government is making a powerful statement. A person's \npast shall not outweigh his potential. A society that believes in reintegration demonstrates a \ncommitment to inclusivity and shared progress. And this is one of the visions of this \nGovernment. And I quote from the speech of the President of the Republic of our country –  \n“Fundamental reforms will be brought to the outdated social security and   social \nintegration operational system of the country.” \n Madam Speaker, by reducing barriers to employment, the Bill helps to create a more \nequitable society in which individuals are judged not solely by the past, but by the \nwillingness to contribute positively in the present. I agree that while it feels unfair to the \napplicant, employers often act out of a sense of risk management while hiring people as if an \nemployee who, with a record commits a crime at work, the company could be responsible for \nnegligent hiring or for roles involving data, money or vulnerable people, a clean certificate is \noften seen as a baseline for trust.  \nIn some sectors, like banking, security and Health Care, law forbids hiring anyone with \nspecific types of record. However, in many countries, including recent reforms in places like \nMauritius, Canada and the UK, laws are changing to prevent blanket rejections. Under spent \nconvictions, laws, minor offences are often removed from a Certificate of Character after a \ncertain period, for example, five to ten years of good behaviour. The suffering caused by a \nCertificate of Character denial is a cycle of economic exclusion and permanent stigma.  \nFor the individual, it feels like they are being punished twice, once by the Courts and \nindefinitely, by the job market. Madam Speaker, and dear colleagues, I would here like to \ntake the example of Japan. Japan has a unique cultural and legal approach to background \nchecks. There is no legal requirement for employers to conduct background checks. In fact, it \nis culturally discouraged for private employers to probe into a person's criminal past unless it \nis directly relevant to a specific licensed profession like law or medicine. The impact is huge \nas a person with a past mistake can often re-enter the workforce without the paper trail of a \ncertificate blocking the path.  \nWhile the US is known for rigorous checks, many states like California, New Jersey \nand Illinois have passed “Ban the Box” laws. Employers cannot ask about your criminal \nhistory on the initial job application. They can only run a background check after they have \ndecided you are the best candidate and made a conditional offer. Here as well, the impact \nensures the person is judged on their skills first, preventing the suffering of immediate \nrejection before they can even interview.  \nIn some developing nations or countries with less centralized digital recording, certain \nregions like Southeast Asia or West Africa, the concept of a formal Certificate of Character \nfor private employment simply does not exist as a standard practice. Recruitment is based \nheavily on personal references and vouching rather than a police database. \n In Spain, under the GDPR Article 10 and specific Spanish laws, criminal record data is \nconsidered highly sensitive. In Spain, most private employers are not allowed to ask for a \ncriminal record certificate. My point here is to debate the fact that the Character of Certificate \nin many countries are not just; rather people are given second chances. \n Of course, it is important to acknowledge that this reform must be implemented with \nappropriate safeguards. The reference to certain criteria ensures that considerations of public \nsafety and trust are not overlooked. There will always be a need to balance the rights of \nindividuals with the protection of a broader community. However, these safeguards should be \nproportionate and should not undermine the central objective of the Bill, that is, to facilitate \ngenuine opportunities for rehabilitation and reintegration. It is also worth noting that \ninternational trends increasingly support such approaches. Many jurisdictions have \nrecognized that overly punitive systems, particularly those that impose long-term collateral \nconsequences are counterproductive. By contrast, policies that promote reintegration have \nbeen shown to reduce reoffending rates and enhance social stability.  \nIn this context, the proposed Bill places Mauritius on a progressive path, aligning it \nwith global best practices in criminal justice and social policy. And, this will enable the \nsociety the civil society to contribute in improving the law and order. \n In conclusion, the proposed Certificate of Character Bill represents a vital step towards \na more just, inclusive and forward-looking society. It acknowledges the realities of social life, \nthe importance of second chances and the transformative power of opportunity. By \nsupporting this Bill, we affirm our commitment to a system of justice that is not only firm, \nbut also compassionate and pragmatic. \n I am delighted that most offences committed under the Quarantine Act 2020 during the \nCOVID-19 pandemic will no longer appear on Certificates of Character. I warmly \ncongratulate the hon. Attorney General for this thoughtful and humane consideration. Who \ncould forget the innocent Bangladeshi expatriate worker who, during the lockdown, was \nfound roaming the streets and responded to police officers with his now famous “chicken, \nchicken” remark? And who does not recall a Dada, a Chacha, a Tonton, who was booked \nunder the Quarantine Act for selling a handful of vegetables. Tras enn la vie, as we say. Once \nbooked, these minor infractions were destined to remain on their Certificate of Character for \nlife.  \nThanks to this Bill, such individuals will now be freed from the burden of offences \ncommitted during that extraordinary COVID-19 period. This measure restores dignity and \nfairness, ensuring that citizens are not permanently penalised for acts committed in times of \nunprecedented hardship.  \nThank you very much. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you for respecting the time. Yes, now we have hon. Ms Leu-\nGovind! \n(5.58 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Arts and Culture (Ms V. Leu-Govind):  Merci, Madame la \nprésidente. Madame la présidente, le Certificat de caractère est aujourd'hui plus important \nqu'un degré ou même qu’un doctorat. The Certificate of Character Bill (No. II of 2026) va \nvenir corriger ce déséquilibre. Ce projet de loi va remplacer la loi actuelle par un cadre plus \nmoderne et plus équilibre. Afin de réduire les obstacles à l'emploi et à la réinsertion sociale \npour des personnes ayant été condamnées, tout en maintenant les garanties nécessaires pour \nles infractions les plus graves.  \nMadame la présidente, permettez-moi tout d'abord d'exprimer mes sincères \nremerciements au Premier ministre, à l'Attorney General, ainsi qu'au gouvernement pour \navoir porté ce projet de loi qui est très important. Je tiens également à saluer le fait que \ncertaines préoccupations soulevées dans cette Assemblée ont été prises en considération.  \nEn effet, lors de mon intervention le 15 avril 2025 pendant le débat sur le National \nDrug Control Bill, j'avais attiré l'attention de cette Chambre sur la nécessité de repenser le \nsystème du certificat de moralité. J'avais alors proposé qu'après une période d'environ 10 ans, \nsans récidive, certains délits ne figurent plus sur le casier judiciaire d'une personne. \nAujourd'hui, avec ce projet de loi, nous constatons que cette réflexion a été entendue. Je \nremercie le gouvernement d'avoir pris en considération cette proposition dans le cadre de \ncette réforme.  \nAvec votre permission, Madame la présidente, permettez-moi de citer une des chansons \ndu grand chanteur Ras Natty Baby qui vient de nous quitter. Même après son départ, ses \nparoles resteront toujours vivantes dans nos cœurs – \n« La zistis drwa egal pou tou. » \nAvec un certificat de moralité, la justice n'est réservée qu'à ceux qui ont des contacts \npolitiques. C'est uniquement eux qui méritent une deuxième chance. Comment pourrait-on \noublier l'épisode du fils de l'ancien Commissaire de Police qui avant même d'être jugé ou \ncondamné, avait obtenu la grâce présidentielle ? Le DPP avait fait appel, mais le \ngouvernement d'alors avait muselé le DPP. Aujourd'hui, ici même dans cette auguste \nAssemblée, nous avons rendu au DPP sa lettre de noblesse et son indépendance. Au fait, faut-\nil être la famille d'un leader de l'opposition ou d'un Premier ministre qui a été, lui, condamné \nune première fois par la cour pour corruption et qui a ensuite fait appel au Privy Council, \nalors que toi, petit malheureux qui n'as pas les moyens de faire appel au Privy Council, tu es \ncondamné à vie ? En plus, ce même accusé par le baron pour financement de trafic de drogue \nn'était même pas interrogé. Et si c'était un simple citoyen, Madame la présidente, on sait tous, \nperquisition, planting et prison !  \nC'est à ce même Premier ministre que le peuple a donné une deuxième chance. Une \npremière chance, une deuxième chance, pour qu'au final, on s'est retrouvé en 2024 avec un \npays saigné à blanc et laissé à genoux. Et ce même Premier ministre est sorti du tombeau \npour venir demander une troisième chance pour les prochaines élections. Madame la \nprésidente, est-ce que les allégations ne sont valables que pour les simples citoyens ? Et il \nfaut saluer l'inclusion des offenses relatives au financement des trafics de drogues dans le \npremier Schedule du Bill, Madame la présidente. Ce sont toujours les petits poissons qui se \nfont attraper dans les filets, pendant ce temps, les gros requins nagent en toute liberté et en \ntoute impunité.  \nMadame la présidente, cependant, il est important de rappeler la réalité. Le problème du \ncertificat de moralité ne concerne pas qu'uniquement le document lui-même. Il concerne \nsurtout ce qui va se passer après. Madame la présidente, aujourd'hui, dans notre pays, le \ncertificat de moralité est exigé pour des démarches administratives et professionnelles. Mais \nlorsqu'un certificat de moralité mentionne une condamnation, même ancienne, la porte se \nferme souvent immédiatement.  \nAujourd'hui, si nous voulons vraiment combattre l'exclusion, nous devons aller au-delà \ndu texte de loi. Il est important que la PSC et le LGSC donnent l'exemple en recrutant les ex-\ndétenus qui répondent certainement aux critères nécessaires, Madame la présidente. Nous \ndevons changer les mentalités. Alors, cette personne doit pouvoir se relever parce qu'un \ncertificat de moralité ne doit pas être une barrière à la réinsertion, ni une double peine \nimposée par la société.  \nMadame la présidente, une société forte n'est pas une société qui enferme les individus \ndès leurs erreurs passées. Une société forte est une société qui croit que l'avenir peut être \ndifférent du passé. Et aujourd'hui, avec ce projet de loi, nous faisons un pas important dans \ncette direction. Je vous remercie, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Merci beaucoup. Nous avançons bien là. Maintenant, l'honorable \nNarsinghen ! \n(6.05 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International \nTrade (Mr H. Narsinghen): Madame la présidente, je vous remercie de me donner la parole. \nComme toujours, je prendrais, cet après-midi, une démarche beaucoup plus pédagogique et je \ndonnerais un petit plan de cette petite intervention.  \nD'abord, une petite introduction. J'essaierais de réfuter certains points du leader de \nl'opposition malgré le fait qu'il ne soit pas là. Et je parlerais aussi de la vision nationale et \naussi inclusive de ce projet de loi, des fondements légaux et philosophiques dans ce projet de \nloi, de l'impératif économique de ce projet de loi, de la réforme de l’approche carcérale, de \ncomment notre prison doit devenir une école et aussi un centre de formation. Ensuite, si j’ai \nle temps, des best practices, le rôle model international. Et aussi parler de comment élargir ce \nconcept. On est en train d'élaborer une théorie : la théorie de la deuxième chance.  \nSo, coming to some of the points raised by the Leader of the Opposition, I am just \ngoing to summarise it. He agreed with the theory we are trying to build: the theory of second \nchance. But then, he mentioned, at the same time, swimming in over-contradiction, saying \nthat the law is being too lenient, and at the same time, there are insufficient safeguards. Also, \nthat it may pose certain threats to employers. I am really surprised.  \nMadam Speaker, when we are passing a law –the Attorney General and his team – we \nhave to understand that we have to listen to all parties and we have to look at all the \nstakeholders. It is an exercise of equilibrium. If we have read the great legal philosopher \nRoscoe Pound, you will understand what we mean by jural postulates and how to strike the \nright balance. So, unfortunately, I think the Leader of the Opposition has been swimming in \ncontroversy.  \nBy contrast, I have to commend the position taken by hon. Baboolall, who has joined \nthe Opposition. He adopted, I would say, a very responsible approach.  \n(Interruptions) \nSo, Madame la présidente, pendant des décennies… \nMadam Speaker: Et il est présent ! \nMr Narsinghen: Bien sûr ! Il faut le féliciter.  \nPendant des décennies, Madame la présidente, notre système judiciaire s'est montré \nd'une efficacité redoutable pour punir, mais, malheureusement, d'une réticence regrettable à \npardonner. Et aujourd'hui, nous avons l'occasion de corriger une faille systémique qui a \ncondamné des milliers de nos concitoyens à une véritable mort civile, un état où une erreur de \njeunesse devient une barrière permanente à une vie digne et productive. Donc, il est grand \ntemps d'offrir une deuxième chance à celles et ceux qui ont fauté certes, mais qui ont évolué, \nappris et méritent d'être réintégrés pleinement dans notre société.  \nMadame la présidente, c'est une réforme porteuse de sens. Le Certificate of Character \nBill n'est pas un simple ajustement procédural comme certains ont voulu nous faire croire. \nC’est une déclaration forte de notre foi dans la capacité de l’être humain à changer, à se \nracheter et à reconstruire une vie.  \nAvant 2006, Madame la présidente, il y avait un vide juridique. En 2006, le Parti \ntravailliste, avec ses alliés, évidemment, a introduit un premier cadre légal pour réglementer \nle certificat de moralité. Je dirais, une avancée certes, mais encore prudente. Je dirais, trop \nprudente. Cependant, en 2012, une nouvelle réforme est venue améliorer la situation des \npersonnes condamnées pour des délits mineurs. Un progrès encore réel mais, à mon goût, \nencore insuffisant.  \nAujourd’hui, nous franchissons une étape décisive, si je peux le dire ainsi, un véritable \nhat-trick. Je n’aime pas trop aller dans la politique partisane, mais je dois dire, un hat-trick du \nParti travailliste, avec son leader, où à chaque fois, trois fois, il a essayé d’apporter des \nréformes, évidemment, avec ses alliés. Donc, qu’est-ce que nous constatons ? Il y a une \nconstance politique au service des plus vulnérables de notre société.  \nÉvidemment, ce projet de loi, vous allez voir, Madame la présidente, a une vision \nnationale et inclusive. Et il faut le dire sans détour, les délits mineurs touchent souvent les \nplus défavorisés, même s’il ne faut jamais tomber dans la généralisation. Les riches, comme \nvous le savez, commettent plus ce qu’on appelle des crimes en col blanc et souvent, ils sont \ndéfendus par les ténors du barreau. Par exemple, voler une mangue peut faire condamner une \npersonne à 2-3 mois de prison mais, par contre, ceux qui ont volé R 7-8 millions ou plus, R \n80 millions, ont seulement une amende.  \nMadame la présidente, nous, comme législateurs, apportons notre pierre à l’édifice. Je \ncomprends qu’il faut respecter ce grand principe de la séparation des pouvoirs. Cependant, je \ndemanderais aux autres institutions de faire un effort pour effacer, du moins, cette perception \nou cette réalité d’un droit à deux vitesses. Impérativement, il faut le faire. \nAussi, Madame la présidente, contrairement à certains discours dangereux, la \ncriminalité ne se limite pas à une ou deux communautés. Elle traverse toute la société. \nPrétendre le contraire est non seulement faux, mais profondément injuste. Heureusement, \nsous l'impulsion du Premier ministre, le Dr. Navin Ramgoolam, et l’Attorney General et \nd’autres personnes, nous poursuivons l'œuvre de Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam, c’est-à-dire \nbâtir une nation unie et juste.  \nMadame la présidente, il faut savoir que ce texte ne tombe pas du ciel. Ce texte a une \nbase juridique. Mon collègue a pris une vision sociologique, et je parlerai de cette base \njuridique et philosophique. Quels sont les fondements juridiques ? Nous voyons que dans \nnotre Code pénal, peut-être que certains de nos concitoyens ne le savent pas, que le droit \npénal est calqué sur le droit français. À l’intérieur de ce Code pénal – déjà le Code pénal à \nl’époque faisait cette distinction claire et nette entre ce qu'on appelle les crimes, les délits et \nles et les contraventions. Malheureusement, pendant toutes ces années, nous avons été d’une \ncertaine façon plus bonapartiste que Napoléon. Il ne fallait pas.  \nC’était clair et net qu'il fallait faire cette distinction entre les crimes graves. L’Attorney \nGeneral a déjà pris toutes les précautions. Quand je faisais des cours à l'université, \nj'expliquais aux étudiants qu’il ne faut pas lire seulement le texte central. Il faut absolument \nlire les cédules aussi. Et là, l’Attorney General et son équipe en a pris tous les soins. \nD’ailleurs, le leader de l’opposition avait mentionné qu’il ne faut pas laisser les gens qui ont \ncommis des fraudes, bien sûr. Les cédules ont pris en considération les remarques du leader \nde l'opposition. Donc, Madame la présidente, c’était une injustice et l’injustice a été corrigée.  \nCe projet de loi introduit aussi le concept de condamnation effacée, ce qu’on appelle en \nanglais, le spent conviction. Il reconnaît qu’après avoir purgé sa peine et démontré une \nconduite irréprochable, un individu ne doit pas être prisonnier de son passé – plusieurs de \nmes collègues ont dit cela.  \nLes fondements philosophiques. Je ne vais pas m’étaler et faire un cours sur la \ncriminologie. D’ailleurs, je ne suis pas criminologue, mais beaucoup plus juriste. En gros, il y \na cette théorie et je prendrai seulement deux ou trois – \n• \nLa théorie de la rétribution, c’est-à-dire en bref, œil pour œil. Donc, une théorie \nqui est complètement dépassée et qu’il faut s’en débarrasser.  \n• \nLa théorie de la dissuasion, basée beaucoup plus sur la peur.  \n• \nLa théorie de la réhabilitation. La majorité des criminels, il faut le reconnaître, \nsont des malades, des névrosés, et il faut punir aussi. Je suis d’accord qu’il faut \npunir mais, il faut aussi guérir et réhabiliter. Malheureusement, il faut concéder \nque pendant tout ce temps, ces pauvres gens-là, malades, ont été opprimés.  \nDonc, ce projet de loi opère, ce que j’appelle, un basculement nécessaire vers la \nréhabilitation. La punition doit avoir une fin, sinon, nous faisons plus œuvre de justice – la \njustice dans le sens le plus large, – sinon, on va vers ce qu’on appelle la vengeance. Il faut \nimpérativement faire cette distinction claire et nette entre la justice, les droits positifs – on ne \npeut pas faire cette équation entre la justice et le droit positif et la vengeance.  \nMadame la présidente, je concède qu’il faut aussi trouver un équilibre entre les victimes \n– il ne faut pas oublier les victimes –, les condamnés et aussi l’intérêt général de la société. \nDonc, il faut protéger la société. Il faut respecter les droits des victimes. D’ailleurs, là, je ferai \nun appel à l’Attorney General pour envisager, dans les mois à venir, comment apporter un \nmécanisme d’indemnisation aux victimes. Là, on est en train de voir les condamnés, mais à \nl’avenir, il faut voir ce mécanisme – comme en Angleterre – d’indemnisation pour les \nvictimes, à l’image de ce qui existe dans d’autres pays. Punir, oui. Réhabiliter, c’est \nimpératif. Indemniser, mais aussi pour les victimes. Je n’oublie pas les victimes. Voilà \nl’équilibre que j'avais énoncé au début.  \nL’impératif économique, c’est un paradoxe. Nous faisons face à une grave crise \ndémographique. Nous faisons face à une pénurie de main-d'œuvre. Nous importons la main-\nd’œuvre. Pendant que nous importons des travailleurs étrangers – d’ailleurs, il faut bien les \ntraiter – des milliers de Mauriciens restent exclus du marché du travail à cause d’un certificat \nde moralité entaché par un délit ancien et mineur. Malheureusement, c’est un gaspillage du \ncapital humain. Ce projet de loi actuel transformera les exclus en contribuables productifs.  \nLà, je fais un appel à l’Attorney General, ce qui est très, très important, Madame la \nprésidente, que nos prisons ne doivent pas être des lieux d’entreposage humain, mais des \ncentres de formation et de réhabilitation. Je me demande à quoi sert de former un détenu et \nsubséquemment à sa sortie, on lui refuse toute opportunité. Donc, ce projet de loi garantit que \nla réinsertion ne sera pas un mirage.  \nMadame la présidente, je suis sûr que l’équipe de l’Attorney General s’est inspirée des \nbonnes pratiques internationales. Les pays scandinaves que nous voyons ont des faibles taux \nde récidive grâce à une approche scientifique et de la réhabilitation. Le Royaume-Uni, nous \navons vu, ils ont passé une loi, le Rehabilitation of Offenders Act, qui permet l’effacement de \ncertaines condamnations. Nous nous alignons, donc, sur des standards internationaux très, \ntrès intéressants.  \nMadame la présidente, je voudrais, avec votre permission, faire un petit aparté. Nous \nsommes en train de construire cette nouvelle théorie de deuxième chance. Il faut étendre cette \nthéorie de la deuxième chance. Je viens sur un point fondamental et là, je fais un appel, \nmalheureusement le Premier ministre n’est pas là, mais …  \nMadam Speaker: Il vous écoute.  \nMr Narsinghen: Je fais un appel à d’autres ministres comme le ministre, Pentiah, le \nministre de la Santé et aussi d’autres ministres pour donner une deuxième chance. Moi je \nconstate que dans ma circonscription, il y a des gens qui n’ont pas les cinq credits, il y a des \ngens qui n’ont pas ce qu’on appelle five passes – ils sont exclus pour le recrutement et \ncomment moi j’ai vue, j’ai des amis, j’ai des membres de ma famille qui à l’époque, 40 ans \nde cela, avaient seulement deux credits, qui sont devenus des professeurs des universités en \nAngleterre et en France.  \nDonc, je demande et je fais une plaidoirie pour qu’à l’avenir, on essaie de récupérer ces \ngens-là aux vues de cette crise démographique et cette crise dans le marché du travail.  \nDonc, voilà, Madame la présidente, je pense que ce projet de loi va solutionner \nbeaucoup de problèmes. Ce projet de loi a essayé d’avoir un équilibre. Donc, je dirai votons \npour ce projet de loi, votons pour un île Maurice plus inclusif, votons pour un Maurice qui \ncroit en son peuple, votons pour la deuxième chance.  \nSo, I strongly –I am not only commanding, Madam Speaker, I am commending \nstrongly this Bill. Thank you for your attention.  \nMadam Speaker: Thank you so much. \nHon. Pierre! \n(6.21 p.m.) \nThe Junior Minister of Tourism (Mr S. Pierre): Thank you, Madam Speaker. I think \nI am going to give you back the few minutes that the hon. Member took because listening the \nvery valid point… \nMadam Speaker: No, he was alright. Half a minute, just half a minute.  \nMr Pierre: Listening to all my colleagues, I think I will just summarise what all of \nthem already mentioned.  \nFew months back, I came to see the hon. Attorney General with regard to a specific \ncase and he was mentioning that this Bill was in preparation and would come to the \nAssembly. So, this afternoon, I would like to, almost evening, tell you a story of a young \ngentleman named Mathieu, nom fictif, qui a aujourd’hui presque 20 ans qui avait commis un \ncrime quelques années de cela, trois à quatre ans, et c’est peut-être aujourd’hui avec ce \nprojet de loi, une opportunité pour nous, à l’état de donner un visage plus humain. Mathieu \navait commis un vol à l’étalage pour nourrir sa sœur Sara, nom fictif également, mais \nl’histoire n’est pas fictive. C’est malheureusement une histoire vraie. Commis un vol pour \nnourrir sa sœur puisque Mathieu et sa sœur sont issus de parents toxicomanes, vivant dans la \nrue qui n’avaient pas d’issue et n’ont toujours pas d’issue. Mais Mathieu avec l’aide de \nquelques personnes, veut reprendre sa vie mais heureusement après ce projet de loi, ce ne \nsera que chose du passé. Mathieu pourra enfin peut-être prétendre avoir un emploi.  \nUn vol à l’étalage pour quelques centaines de roupies et très souvent quand on parle de \nprojet de loi, beaucoup de projets de loi, et si le temps le permet je reviendrai aussi sur le \nFirst Schedule que j’ai revu plusieurs fois. Je sais que hon. Attorney General, a renvoyé une \nnouvelle copie. Nous ne sommes pas ici en train de parler d’absoudre les criminels ou de ne \npas sanctionner. Aujourd’hui quand on parle de – j’ai écouté le chef de l’opposition, \nbeaucoup de mes collègues, la population peut-être a tendance de croire qu’on va absoudre \nles criminels ; il ne s’agit pas de cela. Nous sommes uniquement en train de demander de ne \npas condamner une deuxième fois une personne qui a déjà payé le prix. Nous ne sommes pas \nen train de revoir les peines ni les condamnations.  \nMon collègue, l’honorable Ramdass, a fait un exposé de long en large.  Beaucoup de \nchoses que je voulais dire je ne les reprendrai pas. Nous ne pouvons pas nous permettre de les \nrecondamner puisque comme l’honorable Narsinghen vient de dire, ces gens sont en prison \npour être réhabiliter. La société, notre système est fait ainsi, que ces gens qui ont failli une \nfois, et je suis sûr qu’ici, nous tous, dans cette Chambre et beaucoup de membres de la \npopulation qui m’écoutent ce soir, ont failli, peut-être pas selon les lois en vigueur sous la \nRépublique de l’île Maurice, mais failli d’une manière ou d’une autre. Que celui qui n’a \njamais failli jette la première pierre.  \nTout ce qu’on demande, il s’agit de ce projet de loi, il vient dire qu’il a payé son crime. \nIl a payé le prix. Aujourd’hui, donnons un visage humain a l’état. C’est-a-dire, des fois, on \njuge trop vite puisque quand il s’agit des autres, nous sommes promptes à juger, à \ncondamner, à sanctionner, à mettre le prix même de la sanction. Nous devenons tous juges \nquand il s’agit des autres.  \nMais posons-nous, juste une minute, la question – si Mathieu, 20 ans, nos lois peuvent \ndire qu’il est majeur, 20 ans, si c’était mon fils, je l’appellerai mon bébé. Si c’était votre \ngarçon, il serait toujours, même majeur, votre garçon votre enfant. Mais voyez-vous, il s’agit \nde quelqu’un d’autre. On oublie d’essayer de comprendre l’histoire mais quand on comprend \naujourd’hui la situation, le contexte, le cadre, on devient peut-être plus compatissant.  \nC’est ce visage, et je remercie l’Attorney General, toute son équipe, le gouvernement, \nqui amène aujourd’hui ce projet de loi. Vous savez pourquoi. Quand j’ai regardé le Schedule \nOne, j’ai essayé de comprendre de quel crime peut-être qu’on pourra proposer et je suis sûr \nque tous mes amis ici dans cette Chambre ont essayé de faire la même chose – de se dire est-\nce qu’on ne pourrait peut-être pas enlever ce crime du Schedule One ? Et c’est là où on \ncomprend le travail difficile et compliqué puisque nous avons une responsabilité que je \ncomprends, en tant qu’Etat.  \nMais il ne s’agit pas aujourd’hui de venir définir un crime par apport à un autre crime. \nNous parlons aujourd’hui de donner une deuxième chance. L’honorable membre, Leu-\nGovind, a bien mentionné, nous avons tous droit à une deuxième chance. En écoutant un de \nmes collègues qui parlait et nous avons une belle opportunité également, désoler de reprendre \nce que vous avez dit puisque c’est une vérité – nous avons beaucoup de ministres ici dans la \nChambre et je suis sûr que vous allez réfléchir sur ces quelques mots.  \nDans le Schedule One, il y a beaucoup de crimes mentionnés. Je ne suis pas en train de \nparler d’absoudre ou de réduire les peines, mais posons-nous une question, je n’ai pas la \nréponse – que faisons-nous avec ces personnes qui ont commis un crime, dans quel contexte \nce n’est pas à nous de juger, de poser la question, quel que soit leur crime ? Ils ont payé le \nprix. Que faisons-nous ? N’avons-nous pas plus des risques de les laisser à eux-mêmes et de \nleurs demander de se frayer un chemin dans la société ? Puisque comme l’honorable membre \na dit, ce certificat de moralité, aujourd’hui, il a plus de prix qu’un diplôme.  \nEst-ce justement pour ce pêcheur, pour celui qui nettoie les rues, les jardins, les \njardiniers, est-ce qu’ils ont besoin d’un certificat de moralité ? Et là je ne parle pas des crimes \nmineurs, je parle des certains crimes dans le Schedule One. Je suis sûr que vous aurez peur de \nfaire rentrer quelqu’un chez vous si vous n’êtes pas sûr de sa moralité. Mais nous pouvons \ntous commettre un crime. La science a prouvé aujourd’hui que nous pouvons tous faillir et \nnous faillissions tous.  \nAujourd'hui, l'orientation de ce débat, c'est de lancer une réflexion. Puisque ce projet de \nloi déjà ramène, donne un visage plus humain, il nous faut continuer dans la discussion, dans \nla réflexion, nous dire que faisons-nous ? Est-ce que nous sommes constamment en train de \npunir ou de réhabiliter ? Lançons-nous, aujourd'hui. Nous tous ici – j'ai entendu de très, très \nbons discours, de très bons débats –, mais ce n'est qu'un commencement. Cela ne doit pas \ns'arrêter ici.  \nPuisque nous ne sommes pas que des législateurs, nous sommes aussi des chirurgiens. \nUn chirurgien, est-ce qu'il refuse d'opérer quelqu'un qui a un passé médical ? Même s'il a fait \nplusieurs opérations ? Le serment d'Hippocrate ne l’oblige pas à intervenir ? Et n'est-ce pas \nnotre rôle de continuer de réhabiliter ?  \nC'est cela aujourd'hui mon appel à travers ce projet de loi. Mathieu, aujourd'hui, une \nfois cette loi votée, pourra avoir un travail. Il pourra nourrir sa famille, ne serait-ce qu'au \nmoins sa sœur qui lui tient tellement à cœur.  \nJe vais conclure en parlant du contexte des crimes commis. On oublie souvent. En \nallant trop vite, on oublie. Je ne vais pas revenir sur ce dont beaucoup d'entre vous ont parlé \ndes crimes col blanc qui, très souvent, passent par la grande porte alors que celui qui a besoin \nde manger. Je ne suis pas en train de justifier un crime par rapport à un autre crime. Je dis \njuste, à travers ce projet de loi : essayons de comprendre, donnons une deuxième chance et \ncomprenons que Mathieu n'a jamais voulu voler.  \nMathieu a toujours voulu vivre comme tout le monde. Mathieu a toujours voulu avoir la \nchance que vous avez, que nous avons, que beaucoup de Mauriciens ont. Mais, \nmalheureusement, la situation que nous avons créée, que l'État a créée ou a permise, il s'est \nretrouvé pris dans un engrenage. Il a commis un crime punissable par la loi. Mais, \naujourd'hui, ce projet de loi lui donne espoir. Je réitère mes remerciements à l'Attorney \nGeneral et à toute son équipe. Je pense que nous sommes sur la bonne voie.  \nC'est ici, pour moi, ce pont construit pour l'avenir. Même si ce projet de loi a pris son \ntemps comme beaucoup d'autres projets, je pense que nous sommes sur la bonne voie. \nAujourd'hui, pour nous, c’est la lumière au bout du tunnel et pour beaucoup de milliers de \nMauriciens.  \nMerci beaucoup, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Merci. J'ai noté que vous n'aviez pas de notes. C'est un peu rare. \nMerci et bravo.  \nHonorable Ms Anquetil ! \n(6.33 p.m.) \nMs S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes): Je vous \nremercie, Madame la présidente. Madame la présidente, permettez-moi, en préambule, \nd'adresser mes sincères remerciements au ministre de la Justice, l'honorable Gavin Glover, \npour avoir porté ce projet de loi avec courage, clarté et humanité.  \nCe texte mérite toute notre attention, car il ne traite pas seulement d'une procédure, il ne \ntraite pas seulement d'un document administratif, il traite au fond de la manière dont une \nsociété regarde ses citoyens après qu'ils ont fauté, après qu'ils ont purgé leur peine et au \nmoment où ils cherchent à se relever. Madame la présidente, je ne me lève pas seulement \ncomme députée. Je ne me lève pas seulement comme Chief Whip.  \nJe me lève ce soir comme Stéphanie Anquetil. Je me lève avec un nom, une mémoire, \nun héritage, un nom profondément lié aux luttes du monde du travail, aux combats syndicaux, \nà la dignité humaine, à la justice sociale. Ce nom, Madame la présidente, m'oblige à ne \njamais rester silencieuse face à l'injustice. Il m'oblige à défendre la dignité humaine. Ce nom \nm'oblige à continuer de porter la voix de celles et de ceux que notre société juge parfois trop \nvite, écarte trop facilement ou condamne bien au-delà de la peine prononcée. \nMadame la présidente, il faut avoir l'honnêteté de le dire. Pendant trop longtemps, dans \nnotre pays, trop de nos concitoyens ont continué à être punis bien après avoir purgé leur \npeine. Ils ont été jugés par les tribunaux. Puis, ils ont été rejugés par la société. Ils ont été \ncondamnés par la loi. Puis ils ont été condamnés par le regard des autres, par le refus \nd'embauche, par les soupçons permanents, par les portes refermées. Voilà la vérité, une réalité \ndure, une réalité injuste, une réalité profondément inhumaine. \nMadame la présidente, car derrière un certificat de moralité, il n'y a pas seulement un \ndocument. Il y a une vie. Il y a un père qui veut retravailler pour nourrir sa famille. Il y a une \nmère qui veut reprendre sa place dans la société. Et puis, il y a un jeune. Il y a un jeune qui \nveut sortir d'une erreur et reconstruire son avenir. C'est précisément cette injustice que ce \nprojet de loi vient corriger.  \nAujourd'hui, nous faisons un autre choix. Avec le Certificate of Character Bill 2026, \nnous affirmons un principe simple, juste et profondément républicain. Une personne ne doit \npas être condamnée à vie par une faute pour laquelle elle a déjà répondu devant la justice.  \nMadame la présidente, ce projet de loi ne nie pas les fautes. Il ne les efface pas \nartificiellement. Il ne remet pas en cause l'autorité des tribunaux. Mais il fixe une limite \nclaire. La peine ne doit pas devenir perpétuelle dans ses effets sociaux. La justice ne doit pas \nse transformer en exclusion permanente. La sanction ne doit pas se prolonger indéfiniment \ndans la vie professionnelle et dans la vie sociale.  \nMadame la présidente, ce projet de loi marque un véritable changement de philosophie. \nNous passons d'un système qui enferme l'individu dans son passé à un cadre légal qui \nreconnaît enfin son droit à la reconstruction. Les dispositions proposées sont claires. Les \namendes n'excédant pas R 50 000 disparaîtront du certificat après deux ans au lieu de cinq \nans. Les peines d'emprisonnement inférieures à trois ans seront effacées après 10 ans. Et \nsurtout, les faits commis avant l'âge de 18 ans n'y figureront plus du tout.  \nCette dernière avancée est essentielle, car un mineur ne doit pas porter toute sa vie le \npoids d'une erreur de jeunesse. Une société juste, Madame la présidente, c’est faire la \ndifférence entre la nécessité de corriger et la tentation de condamner définitivement. Une \nsociété responsable sait tendre la main à celui qui a trébuché, surtout lorsqu'il était encore en \nconstruction. Mais ce projet de loi va encore plus loin.  \nIl introduit dans notre droit du travail un principe fondamental. Un antécédent judiciaire \nne peut pas à lui seul justifier une exclusion professionnelle lorsqu'il n'a aucun lien avec les \nfonctions concernées. Autrement dit, un employeur ne pourra plus écarter un candidat de \nmanière injustifiée pour une condamnation sans rapport avec le poste.  \nC'est une avancée majeure, une avancée juridique certes, mais surtout une avancée \nhumaine. Parce que le travail est souvent la première condition de la réinsertion. Sans emploi, \nil n'y a ni stabilité, ni autonomie, ni véritable seconde chance. Sans emploi, la réhabilitation \nreste un mot vide. Sans emploi, on enferme à nouveau l'individu dans la marginalisation. En \nmodifiant l'Equal Opportunities Act, nous faisons entrer dans notre législation une exigence \nde cohérence. Si nous voulons une société plus sûre, plus stable et plus juste, alors nous \ndevons aussi permettre aux personnes réhabilitées de reprendre pleinement leur place dans \ncette société. \n Madame la présidente, au fond, la question qui nous est posée aujourd'hui est simple. \nCroyons-nous, oui ou non, à la possibilité pour un être humain de se relever ? Croyons-nous, \noui ou non, qu'une faute, une fois sanctionnée, ne doit pas anéantir toute possibilité d'avenir ? \nCroyons-nous, oui ou non, que la justice doive laisser une place à la réhabilitation, à la \ndignité retrouvée, à la seconde chance ? \nPour ma part, la réponse est claire. Oui. Oui, j'y crois. Oui, j'y crois ! J'y crois parce \nqu'un pays ne se grandit pas en accablant définitivement ceux qui cherchent à se reconstruire. \nJ'y crois parce que la fermeté n'exclut pas l'humanité. J'y crois parce qu'une République digne \nde ce nom doit savoir punir avec justesse mais aussi permettre le relèvement.  \nMadame la présidente, sous le leadership de notre Premier ministre, le Dr. Navin \nRamgoolam et dans la continuité des valeurs portées par le Parti travailliste, nous faisons ici \nun choix de société. Le choix d'une justice plus équilibrée, le choix d'une justice plus \nhumaine, le choix d'une justice qui ne renonce ni à la responsabilité ni à la dignité. C'est \npourquoi, Madame la présidente, je soutiens ce projet de loi avec conviction, avec force et \navec une profonde émotion. Je le soutiens parce qu'il corrige une injustice réelle. Je le \nsoutiens parce qu'il protège la dignité de nos concitoyens. Je le soutiens parce qu'il affirme \nque la justice ne consiste pas seulement à punir mais aussi à permettre de reconstruire. \nAujourd'hui, nous avons l'occasion d'adopter un test juste, utile et profondément nécessaire. \nNe manquons pas à ce rendez-vous. Je vous remercie pour votre attention. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Pentiah, after this big advocacy from everyone. Now, it is your \nturn. \n(6.42 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms (Mr L. Pentiah):  \nMadam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Yes! \nMr Pentiah: Allow me please to start with the following citation, and I quote – \n“The true measure of justice is not only in the enforcement of the law, but in its impact \non society whether it promotes fairness, inclusion and human dignity.” – The United \nNations. \nMadam Speaker, a law is only as strong as the lives it improves. And justice must build \ntrust rather than create division. For long, colleagues practicing at the bar in law, retribution \nhas been the fundamental principle of justice. It is almost inevitably the human instinct that \nwhen someone commits a criminal offence, then he or she deserves to suffer for it. He or she \nhas to pay for it. I must say, this has not been about revenge. Instead, and in lieu, it has been \nargued to be about fairness. \n The punishment must fit the crime. Wrongdoing does not go unanswered. Retribution \nhas remained essential to serve two fundamental purposes. First, through punishment or \npenalties, the Criminal Justice System declares what it will not tolerate. The Criminal Justice \nSystem declares what is acceptable behaviour and what is unacceptable behaviour. Secondly, \nwhere punishment or penalty is fair and measured, it builds public trust. The rule of law \ndepends on that trust. It has even been argued that without retribution, justice has no \nbackbone. \n Madam Speaker, need I say that retribution focuses almost entirely on punishment? It \nhas done little to change the offender. Locking people away does not fix why they broke the \nlaw in the first place. Poverty, ignorance, addiction, mental illness, amongst other things, \nremain the untouched root causes. Offenders often serve their time, get out and face with no \nother alternative but to reoffend to survive.  Retribution alone may create a cycle of harm. \n Madam Speaker, the above shortcomings pave the way, as we have mentioned before, \nto rehabilitative justice in penal law. Rehabilitative justice asks a different question. How can \na person stop offending? The core belief is simple. People can change. People can learn to \nlive within the boundaries of the law, given the right support.  \nHence, the relentless efforts of this Government to provide the long-awaited support \nwith the appropriate legal framework to ensure that not only the law enforcement agencies \nfunction independently and effectively, but this Government aims to promote fairness, \ninclusion and human dignity as it has always advocated. People come first. \n Madam Speaker, rehabilitative justice is to prevent reoffending. It means addressing \nthe real causes of criminal behaviour. This Government is committed to address issues such \nas education, learning job skills, rehabilitation for those struggling with drugs and alcohol \nabuse, treating mental illness, proper community support, and therefore, give the hope that \neveryone deserves to have a second chance, where the past cannot dictate the future, qu’après \nles ténèbres, il y aura la lumière. \nMadam Speaker, this Government is slowly but surely continuing to build the bridge \ntowards a better tomorrow with a safer society. Yes, we admit it will take time and \ncontinuous efforts. Because one cannot undo a decade of erosion to our socio-economic \nfabric and institutional degradation. We are not magicians and nor do we sell irresponsible \ndreams. This Government is committed towards a better tomorrow where peace prevails, \nwhere justice reigns and liberty is lived with respect and responsibility. \nMadam Speaker, this brings us to the third “R” of the criminal justice system, often \nreferred to as Restitutive justice. While retribution punishes the offender and rehabilitative \njustice focuses on the offender, restitutive justice focuses on the repair of the harm caused by \nthe offender. It has been argued that restitution promotes fairness and accountability. It forces \nthe offender to face the real-world and the consequences of his or her action. That recognition \ncan be a first step towards genuine change.  \nMadam Speaker, there has been evolution in the fundamental principles of criminal \njustice system from retribution to rehabilitation and restitution. Jurisdictions around the \nworld, often referred to as developed jurisdictions of criminal justice, have evolved from \nretribution to rehabilitation to restitution.  \nMadam Speaker, this Government dares to go beyond these 3 R’s. The Certificate of \nCharacter Bill (No. II of 2026) brings in between its lines within its 14 clauses and its 29 \npages, the fourth R, the principle of redemption in our criminal justice system.  \nMadam Speaker, redemption is the fundamental belief that a person who has done \nwrong can become better. They can change. He or she can repair his or her moral standing. \nSociety can accept the person again. This is not about excusing the crime. It is about \nbelieving that the past does not have to be the future. Redemption is closely tied to \nforgiveness, second chances and personal transformation. Unlike retribution which looks \nbackward at the offence, redemption looks forward at the person. Unlike restitution which \nfocuses on material compensation, redemption focuses on inner change. The question it asks \nis this; can someone who broke the law become a good citizen? The answer of this \nGovernment is ‘yes’.  \nIn this Government, we believe that people grow, people learn, people often regret what \nthey have done and choose differently. In penal law, redemption appears in practical forms. \nConditional discharges and parole give an offender a chance to prove they can and have \nchanged. Record expungement allows a past conviction to be sealed after a certain period. \nHence, the provisions of the Certificate of Character Bill (No. II of 2026). The Certificate of \nCharacter of a person shall no more be another certificate of condemnation denying him/her \nthe opportunity to reintegrate his community after he has paid his dues. Reintegration \nprogrammes help former prisoners find housing, find work and find a way back to their \ncommunity. These are not acts of leniency, they are recognition that people can learn their \nway back. \nMadam Speaker, redemption gives offenders a reason to try. If no second chance exists, \nwhy bother changing? If the record follows you forever, why not offend again? If after you \npay your dues, you still cannot meet the basic needs of your child, your family or yourself, \nwhy not offend again? Madam Speaker, redemption breaks that logic, it creates hope. That \nhope motivates real effort, a reformed offender is a gain for public safety, a gain for the \nsociety and a gain for humanity.  \nRedemption may not universally be accepted, Madam Speaker. Some crimes feel so \nsevere, people’s opinions can be harsh. Certain offences generate permanent distrust no \nmatter how much time has passed. Redemption also requires real effort from the offender. It \ncannot be granted to someone who refuses to change and society must be willing to accept \nthem back. Without jobs, housing and basic respect, redemption remains empty words. This \nGovernment has responsibly taken a big leap forward to address these issues through the \nCertificate of Character Bill before the House. People do not remain fix, they can change. A \njustice system that leaves no room for a second chance is a cruel system. It locks people in \nthe worst moment and throws the key away. The Certificate of Character Bill, before this \nHouse, offers a way out. It moves our criminal justice system beyond punishment and \ntowards healing for the individual, for the community and the nation as a whole consequently \nbenefits. \nMadam Speaker, very few of us who encountered Victor Hugo’s chef d’oeuvre – Les \nMisérables can ever forget Jean Valjean…. \nMadam Speaker: Les Misérables. \nMr Pentiah: Les Misérables – struggles from many years of imprisonment to rejection \nby the society and constant persecution by Javert. While reading, quite a lot of us condone \nJavert; the way he behaved, the way he acted, the way he persecuted Jean Valjean and we \nsomehow felt emotions towards Jean Valjean. We cannot identify ourselves with the approach \nthat the policing or the Police officer who believes that the law must be followed without \nexception. Then came the God-sent act of kindness of the Bishop that paved the way for Jean \nValjean to change his life and decide to become a good and honest man. \nLes Misérables were the impact of poverty and injustice where the importance of \ncompassion over harsh judgment and where redemption and second chances give lessons to \nlearn with humility and call for a responsible Government to act responsibly. I quote, Madam \nSpeaker – \n« Il n’y a ni mauvaise herbe, ni mauvais hommes. Il n’y a que des mauvais \ncultivateurs. » - Victor Hugo \nMadam Speaker… \nMadam Speaker: Tell us where! Tell us! \nMr Pentiah: Madame la présidente… \nMadam Speaker: Victor Hugo dans? \nMr Pentiah: Les Misérables. \nMadam Speaker: Toujours dans Les Misérables ? \n(Interruptions) \nMr Pentiah: Madame la présidente, l’histoire retiendra le sens des responsabilités de ce \ngouvernement vers un avenir meilleur et ces cultivateurs qui ont mis notre pays et l’avenir de \nnos enfants en péril.  \nWith these words, Madam Speaker, I commend the Certificate of Character Bill (No. II \nof 2026) to the House and I thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Dr. Sukon, yes? \nDr. Sukon: Madam Speaker, I move that the debate be now adjourned. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. \nDr. Boolell rose and seconded.  \nQuestion put and agreed to.  \nDebate adjourned accordingly.  \nMadam Speaker: Adjournment!  \nADJOURNMENT \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now \nadjourn to Tuesday 05 May 2026 at 11.30 a.m. \nMr Mohamed rose and seconded.  \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, the House stands adjourned! We have adjournment matters. Yes, \nMr Beechook? \nMATTERS RAISED \n(6.57 p.m.) \nBUILDING AND LAND USE PERMIT – APPLICATION PROCESSING \nDELAYS  \nMr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil): Merci, Madame la \nprésidente. Je souhaite attirer l’attention de cette auguste Assemblée sur un problème qui \ntouche non seulement mes mandants, mais la population dans son ensemble et il nous \nincombe d’y remédier. Lorsqu’un citoyen dépose – comme l’exige la loi – une demande de \npermis de construction, communément appelé Building and Land Use Permit auprès des \nCollectivités locales, la législation prévoit que cette demande soit examinée dans un délai de \nhuit jours par un inspecteur, puis dans un délai de cinq jours par un Head Planner avant \nd’être soumise avec ou sans recommandation au Planning Committee des District Councils, \ndes municipalités. \nCependant, lorsqu’une demande de BLUP requiert l’avis ou l’approbation d’autres \ninstances tel que la Land Drainage Authority, la RDA, la TMRSU, le ministère de \nl’Environnement, la FAREI, les Veterinary Services et j’en passe, il n’existe aucune \ndisposition légale les contraignant à se prononcer dans un délai raisonnable. Ainsi, un mois, \ndeux mois, voire trois, six, neuf, un an, chaque institution procédant à son propre rythme sans \nobligation de célérité… \nMadam Speaker: Et pas de concertation ! \nMr Beechook: D’accord ? Ce vide administratif, Madame la présidente, pénalise \nlourdement les demandeurs. Très souvent, les demandes de BLUP expirent et les citoyens \ndoivent reprendre la procédure depuis le début. Pendant ce temps, qu’est-ce qui se passe ? \nLes coûts de construction augmentent +5, +10, +20% en un an. Les délais pour signer une \noffre bancaire de financement expirent et bien des projets finissent par être abandonnés. Dans \nun esprit de justice ou de compassion envers nos concitoyens, je demande par la présente au \nministre des Collectivités locales, ainsi que tous les ministères concernés de s’imposer un \ndélai maximum de 15 jours pour la délivrance des avis et autres approbations afin de garantir \nl’octroi des BLUPs dans un délai raisonnable et respectueux dans l’attente de la population. \nMerci, Madame la présidente. \nMadam Speaker: Quinze jours chacun. \nMr Beechook: Non, mais c’est parallèle. \nMadam Speaker: En même temps ? \nMr Beechook: C’est une offre parallèle. \nMadam Speaker: En même temps ? \nMr Beechook: Oui, en même temps. Un délai de 15 jours. Il y a un vide administratif \nqui pénalise les demandeurs. \nMadam Speaker: M. le ministre! \nThe Minister of Local Government (Mr R. Woochit): Madam Speaker, I have \nlistened to the question very well. So, LDA, Traffic Management and Road Safety Unit, the \nRDA, FAREI are not on the National Electronic Licencing System (NELS). So, it takes time. \nSometimes, we have that PER, with have KIA which take time but I seize this opportunity to \nmake a request/an appeal to all the colleague Ministers which are concerned for the clearance \nof these. It should be aligned with our timeframe, in fact, to facilitate the processing of the \npermits. Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: I am sure your colleagues have heard you but it is not the first time \nwe are talking of lots of different entities dealing with one problem. You remember last \nweek? \nMr Woochit: We are bringing the reform of the Local Government Act and we will \nliaise with the Attorney General’s office and with EDB also. We can help and we can find \nsolutions for this. \nMadam Speaker: But you have heard the plea of Mr Beechook. Everyone is happy? \nOkay, thank you! \nAt 7.01 p.m. the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 05 May 2026 at \n11.30 a.m. \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nBANK OF MAURITIUS – DIRECTOR OF SUPERVISION – ROLE & \nRESPONSIBILITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/541",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 541,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/541) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the introduction of the Alalila \nplatform powered by Uber in Mauritius, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nNational Land Transport Authority, information as to whether – \n(a) \nit is in presence of representations from some taxis operators regarding same, and \n(b) \nthe approval of the Authority was sought and obtained prior thereto and, if so, \nindicate the conditions attached thereto and, if not, indicate the actions that will \nbe taken in relation thereto, if any.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSHELTER CAP L’ESPOIR – ACTING SHELTER MANAGER– QUALIFICATION \nREQUIREMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/542",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 542,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/542) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the Shelter \nCap L’Espoir, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the identity of \nthe current Acting Shelter Manager, indicating the scheme of duties thereof and qualification \nrequirements therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS – MAURITIAN CANDIDATES’ \nPERFORMANCE – REMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/543",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 543,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Mr Jhummun)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "(No. B/543) Mr R. Jhummun (Second Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Education and Human Resource whether, in regard to the \nperformance of Mauritian candidates in the last Cambridge International Examinations, he \nwill state the – \n(a) \nremedial measures being envisaged to address same, and  \n(b) \nresponsibility of the different authorities, particularly, the Quality Assurance \nand Inspection Division, in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMINISTRY OF LAND TRANSPORT – APPEAL COMMITTEE – PENDING \nAPPEALS – REMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/544",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 544,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/544) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Appeal Committee \nof his Ministry, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number and \ntype of appeals pending before the Board thereof over the past two years, indicating the – \n(a) \ntimeframe set for the consideration thereof, and  \n(b) \nmeasures being envisaged to address the delays in determining the appeals.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nWATER SUPPLY – MUDDY/MURKY WATER COMPLAINTS – REASONS & \nREMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/545",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 545,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/545) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to water \nsupply, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, \ninformation as to whether it is in presence of complaints to the effect that same is muddy or \nmurky and, if so, indicate the – \n(a) reasons therefor, and  \n(b) remedial measures being taken in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBROWN SEQUARD HOSPITAL – MORTUARY – UNCLAIMED CORPSES – \nMEASURES ENVISAGED",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/546",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 546,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/546) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the unclaimed \ncorpses at the mortuary of the Brown Sequard Hospital, he will state – \n(a) \nthe number thereof, indicating in each case since when same have been lying \nthereat; \n(b) \nthe measures being envisaged in relation thereto, and  \n(c) \nwhether his Ministry has received requests from medical colleges for the handing \nover thereof for research purposes and, if so, where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBEL AIR-TROU D'EAU DOUCE – TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY – NEW BUS \nROUTE – TAXI LICENSE ISSUANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/547",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 547,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/547) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to transport connectivity between \nBel Air and Trou d'Eau Douce, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National \nLand Transport Authority, information as to whether consideration will be given for the – \n(a) \nintroduction of a new bus route along same;  \n(b) \nextension of the existing Route 55 from Trou d'Eau Douce to the proposed Mini \nTraffic Centre, and  \n(c) \nissue of Public Service (Taxi) Licences for operation along same.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMARE CHICOSE LANDFILL STATION –MAINTENANCE CONTRACT – \nCONTRACTOR’S DETAILS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/548",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 548,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mrs Savabaddy)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. B/548) Ms A. Savabaddy (First Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change \nwhether, in regard to the contract for the transportation, operation and maintenance of the \nMare Chicose Landfill Station, he will state the company to which same was awarded and \nwhen, indicating whether his Ministry is in presence of information to the effect that same \nhas been sub-contracted and of any adverse report against the contractor and, if so, indicate \nthe actions taken in relation thereto, if any.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRESIDENCE LAVANDE HOUSING COMPLEX, DAGOTIERE – VESTED SITE –\nMAINTENANCE MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/549",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 549,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "B/549\nThe Honourable Second Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or \n(Mr Beejan) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Environment, Solid Waste \nManagement and Climate Change – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Grand Bay Waterfront, he will state \nwhether consideration is being given for the preparation of a \nMasterplan for the development thereof under Public Private \nPartnership and, if so, indicate the expected timeframe for the \npreparation and implementation thereof and, if not, why not?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/550",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 550,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Mr Venkatasami)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Housing and Lands",
      "question": "(No. B/550) Mr G. P. Venkatasami (Third Member for Quartier Militaire & \nMoka) asked the Minister of Housing and Lands whether, in regard to the Residence \nLavande Housing complex at Dagotiere, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nNational Housing Development Company Ltd., information as to – \n(a) \nwhether the site has been vested in the Moka District Council and, if not, why \nnot, and  \n(b) \nthe measures in place for the regular maintenance of the green spaces and \namenities thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nELECTRICITY TARIFFS – 15% INCREASE – IMPACTS – MITIGATING \nMEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/551",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 551,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "B/551\nThe Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis \nCentral (Dr Aumeer) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness – \n \nWhether, in regard to medications, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Pharmacy Board, information as \nto the number of applications for registration thereof \nawaiting approval over the 12-month period ending  \n01 March 2026, indicating (a) in respect of each medication, \nthe importer concerned therewith and (b) whether, on \naccount of non-availability thereof, alternative means for the \nprocurement thereof were sought, particularly for use in \npublic hospitals?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/552",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 552,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "B/552\nThe Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue (Mr Caserne) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Gender Equality and Family \nWelfare – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Social Welfare Centres, she will \ntable the list thereof currently not operational, indicating, in \neach case (a) since when same has ceased to be operational \nand the reasons therefor and (b) whether consideration will \nbe given for the reinstatement thereof and, if so, when?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/553",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 553,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/553) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the announced 15 \npercent increase in electricity tariffs as from May 2026, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Central Electricity Board, information as to – \n(a) \nwhether the impact thereof on households and small businesses has been \nassessed, indicating the mitigating measures being envisaged regarding \nvulnerable consumers, and  \n(b) \nthe number of households having had their electricity supply disconnected over \nthe past year for non-payment of bills.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 7 – WOMEN’S CENTRE – EXPECTED REOPENING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/554",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 554,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/554) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked \nthe Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the Women’s \nCentre in Constituency No. 7, Piton and Rivière du Rempart, she will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to the expected timeframe for the reopening thereof, indicating \nthe works undertaken or envisaged thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFOREIGN WORKERS – LICENSING, COMPLIANCE & SAFEGUARDS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/555",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 555,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms",
      "question": "B/555\nThe Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Public Service and Administrative \nReforms – \n \nWhether, in regard to the shortcomings noted by the Director \nof Audit in his last report in respect of Rodrigues Island, he \nwill state whether consideration will be given for the \nintroduction of structural reforms, capacity building \nprogrammes, and appropriate follow-up and evaluation \nmechanisms for the enhanced efficiency of public officers in \nthe discharge of their duties?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/556",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 556,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floreal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "(No. B/556) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the Minister \nof Labour and Industrial Relations whether, in regard to the recruitment of foreign workers, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain the – \n(a)  list of the agencies currently authorised therefor, indicating the beneficial owner/s \nin each case;  \n(b)  number of licences refused, suspended or revoked over the past three years, \nindicating the reasons therefor, and  \n(c)  monitoring mechanisms in place to prevent abuse, the charging of illegal fees and \ncollusion therein.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nCONSTITUENCY NO.18 – DRAINS CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/557",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 557,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/557) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the construction of drains \nin Constituency No.18, Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Land Drainage Authority, information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nTRUST FUND FOR EXCELLENCE IN SPORTS – MR N. V.’S REVOCATION – \nINQUIRY & IRREGULARITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/558",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 558,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/558) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the revocation of Mr N. V. as \nChairperson of the Trust Fund for Excellence in Sports, he will state – \n(a)  the reasons therefor, indicating whether an inquiry was conducted prior thereto, \nand  \n(b)  whether – \n(i)  \nhe has taken cognizance of allegations of irregularities thereat and of \ninterference by the Chief Executive Officer thereof in the management of \nthe Fund made by Mr N.V., and  \n(ii)  the governance structure and operation of the Fund will be reviewed.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPESTICIDES REGULATORY OFFICE – STAFF REDUCTION – REASONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/559",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 559,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floreal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/559) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the \nMinister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to \nthe Pesticides Regulatory Office, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as \nto the reasons for the reduction in the number of officers posted thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSAINT-CROIX – SOCIAL WELFARE CENTRE – DEMOLITION – NEW \nBUILDING",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/560",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 560,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/560) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the \ndemolition of the building housing the Saint-Croix Social Welfare Centre to make way for a \nMulti-Use Games Area project, she will state whether provision has been made for the \nconstruction of a new building to house the said centre and, if not, why not and, if so, where \nmatters stand, indicating the reasons for the delay in the implementation thereof and the \nexpected start and completion dates thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBAMBOUS – BLACK RIVER DISTRICT COURT – RENOVATION & FUNDS \nALLOCATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/561",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 561,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "the Attorney-General",
      "question": "(No. B/561) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nAttorney-General whether, in regard to the building which formerly housed the Black River \nDistrict Court at Bambous, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the \ncurrent state thereof, indicating – \n(a) \nsince when same is closed; \n(b) \nwhether funds have been earmarked for the renovation thereof and, if so, indicate \nthe expected start and completion dates thereof, and  \n(c)  whether security services are provided thereat.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBASIC INVALIDITY PENSION – APPLICATIONS (NOV 2024-APR 2026) – \nPROCESS EFFICIENCY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/562",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 562,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/562) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \nwhether, in regard to applications for the Basic Invalidity Pension received since November \n2024 to date, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Medical Board, \ninformation as to the number thereof rejected, indicating the reasons therefor and the number \nthereof allowed on appeal, further indicating the average time taken for the determination of \nan appeal and measures being envisaged to enhance the efficiency and fairness of the \ndetermination process.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRESIDENCE NHDC LAVANDE, DAGOTIERE – BUS SERVICES & ROUTES – \nAVAILABILITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/26",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 26,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. A/26) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the safety of approximately 4,000 \nresidents, including schoolchildren of Residence NHDC Lavande, Dagotière, who need to \ncross the Valetta bypass to avail themselves of bus services, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain from the National Land Transport Authority, information as to whether bus \nroutes Nos. 17C, 105, 135 and 226A and 226B will be reviewed or new bus routes will be \nintroduced thereat.",
      "answer": "Reply: As per the 2022 Housing and Population Census published in May 2024, the \nVillage of Dagotière, comprising Lower and Upper Dagotière, has an estimated population of \napproximately 7,600 inhabitants. The area has limited local economic and educational \nfacilities, with residents mostly travelling to Port Louis, Curepipe, St Pierre and Rose Hill for \ntheir daily socio-economic activities. \nResidence Lavande, located in Upper Dagotière, is already adequately served by \nexisting bus services, namely Route 105 (Vuillemin – Rose Hill) and Route 135 (Vuillemin – \nPort Louis), operating throughout the day at frequencies of 10 to 15 minutes during peak \nhours and up to 50 minutes during off-peak periods.   \nConnectivity is further enhanced through additional services as follows – \n(a) \ntwo express services to Port Louis on Route 135 at 07h00 and 07h10; \n(b) \none dedicated school service on Route 105 at 07h15; \n(c) \ntwo school-day services on Route 17B at 07h00 and 07h15; \n(d) \none weekday service on Route 17F at 07h00, and \n(e) \none return trip from Curepipe to Upper Dagotière at 14h50 on school days. \nRoute 17C (Curepipe – Camp Thorel) has been discontinued for more than 10 years \ndue to lack of economic viability. \nAccording to the National Land Transport Authority, only Routes 226 and 226/A do \nnot provide a loop service via Upper Dagotière. These two routes are already a relatively long \none of approximately 40 kilometres and are subject to complaints regarding adherence to \ntheir timetable, mainly due to traffic congestion along its itinerary. Any extension of this \nroute to serve Residence Lavande would likely exacerbate public dissatisfaction as it will \nincrease the time taken for the trip and place additional strain on both the bus crews and \ncommuters.  \nThe problem, as outlined by the hon. Member in the question, is more an issue of road \nsafety where intending passengers have to cross Valetta bypass to avail of services along \nroute 226 and 226/A. The Traffic Management Road Safety Unit is working on a signalised \npedestrian crossing at that locus.  The project is at design stage and is expected to be \ncompleted by November 2026. \nThe TMRSU will be instructed to carry out a site visit at the locus concerned and to \nconsider whether any measures can be taken at the least possible delay pending the \nimplementation of the signalised pedestrian crossing at that locus. \nIn view of the above, it is not considered necessary at this stage to review existing \nroutes or introduce additional bus services for Residence Lavande, Dagotière. \nThe situation will nevertheless continue to be closely monitored by the National Land \nTransport Authority, any new services required would be subject to a prior technical \nassessment covering both operational feasibility and road safety considerations following a \njoint site visit with the NLTA and TMRSU during peak hours to consider any road safety \nmeasure earlier and to also assess how to best resolve the problem faced by residents of \nResidence Lavande.  \nThe Ministry is also in the process of implementing a Fleet Management System \n(FMS), which will soon come into operation. This system will enable real-time monitoring \nand better management of bus fleet operations, including tracking of vehicles, adherence to \nschedules, and optimisation of deployment. It is expected to enhance operational efficiency, \nimprove service reliability, and strengthen overall regulatory oversight of public transport \nservices. In this respect, the FMS will contribute to improved service delivery across the \nnetwork, including in areas such as Dagotière, by allowing more responsive and evidence-\nbased management of existing services. \nLOW RAINFALLS – ESA ASSESSMENT– WATER & RAINFALL MANAGEMENT \nPLAN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/27",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 27,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change",
      "question": "(No. A/27) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change whether, \nin regard to low rainfalls, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nwhether – \n(a) \nan assessment thereof on environmentally sensitive areas has been carried out, \nand \n(b) \na long-term water and rainfall management plan has been prepared and, if so, \nindicate the measures considered thereunder, including regarding – \n(i) \nre-afforestation and afforestation and forest conservation programmes in \nurban and rural areas; \n(ii) \nexpansion of riparian buffers, and \n(iii) construction of wetlands.",
      "answer": "Reply: In line with the Government Programme 2025-2029, Government recognises \nthe importance of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA) as natural shields to protect our \npeople and biodiversity. \nThe Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management and Climate Change \n(MOESWMCC) is presently working on the review and update of a draft Environmentally \nSensitive Areas (ESA) Bill of 2009 under the “Mainstreaming Sustainable Land Management \n(SLM) and Biodiversity Conservation in the Republic of Mauritius” project, which is funded \nby the United Nations Development Programme/Global Environment Fund (UNDP/GEF). \nThe services of a Legal Specialist have been enlisted by the UNDP Country Office (CO) for \nthat purpose. \nConsultations started since June 2024 with relevant stakeholders from both the public \nand private sectors and Non-Governmental Organisations. A validation workshop is \nscheduled by end of May 2026 by the UNDP Country Office, following which, a draft \nconsolidated ESA Bill will be submitted in June 2026. \nWith regard to part (a) of the question, the Ministry of Agro-Industry, Food Security, \nBlue Economy and Fisheries has informed that no assessment of the impact of the recent \noccurrence of low rainfall on ecologically sensitive areas has been carried out by the National \nParks and Conservation Service (NPCS).  \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, the Ministry of Energy and Public Utilities has \ninformed that the water resources situation, mainly in relation to rainfall, is being closely \nmonitored and followed at all levels. Projects are being implemented for water mobilisation, \nwater supply and wastewater treatment and disposal. The National Water Policy is under \nreview and a Strategic Integrated Master Plan for the water sector will be prepared. \nRiver Reserves (riverine buffers) are protected under the Forests and Reserves Act. The \nForestry Service has increased its frequency of patrols for enforcement of the Act and its \nRegulations on State lands and Reserves, including on river reserves and mountain reserves. \nWith a view of accelerating climate resilience, several mini forests in rural and urban areas \nhave been set up. \nThe Forestry Service has also been working in partnership with the NGO Natir to \nrehabilitate the water catchment area near the Mare aux Vacoas Reservoir on a pilot project. \nApproximately 5,500 native trees have been introduced across 4 hectares of land, with \nrestoration efforts along the riverine buffers.  \nThe NPCS is currently monitoring the creation of a new wetland at Les Salines, Rivière \nNoire, by New Mauritius Hotels Ltd, in line with conditions issued in the Environmental \nImpact Assessment licence issued to the latter by the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste \nManagement and Climate Change.",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/28",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 28,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations",
      "question": "A/28\nThe Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka \n(Dr Ms Thannoo) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Labour and Industrial Relations – \n \nWhether, in regard to persons with disabilities, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to (a) the number \nof companies recruiting same as required by law and  \n(b) whether an action plan has been developed to promote \nsustainable \nemployment \nthereof, \nincluding \nregarding \nreasonable \nadjustment, \naccommodation, \nassistive \ntechnology, flexible work arrangements, implementation of \ninformed Human Resource Management diversity policies, \nprovision \nof \ntraining \nand \ndevelopment, \nleadership, \nparticipation and support strategies?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/29",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-28-april-2026",
      "date": "2026-04-28",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 29,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "A/29\nThe Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka \n(Dr Ms Thannoo) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Education and Human \nResource – \n \nWhether, in regard to the students of the Foundation \nProgramme in Literacy, Numeracy and Skills, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to the reasons for \nthe non-availability of certain textbooks therefor, indicating \nwhether same will be remedied as a matter of urgency? \n \n \n \nBibi Safeena Lotun, C.S.K. (Mrs)                                          \n Clerk of the National Assembly \n \nParliament House \nPort Louis  \n \n24 April 2026",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/563",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 563,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/563) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,  Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to affidavits in respect of applications for residence permits, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain information as to whether consideration will be given for the possibility of \nthe swearing in thereof in Mauritius and, if so, when same will be effective and, if not, why \nnot.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, Section 7 of the Immigration Act provides for \nthe eligibility criteria for temporary residence permit for a non-citizen who has married a \ncitizen of Mauritius. \nSection 7(1) states that, I quote, –  \n“a non-citizen shall be eligible for a temporary residence permit where he is – \n(a) \ncivilly married to a citizen and he was not a prohibited immigrant at the time of \nbecoming such a spouse.” \nSection 7(4) stipulates that –  \n“Where the marriage between a non-citizen and a citizen is celebrated outside Mauritius, \nno application for a temporary residence permit shall be entertained unless the non-\ncitizen submits – \n(a) \nhis marriage certificate certifying that he is civilly married to his citizen spouse, \nand \n(b) \nan affidavit or any other document, duly sworn or affirmed by him before a court \nof law in his country of residence, attesting that, on the date of his marriage to the \ncitizen, he was not married to any other person.” \nMadam Speaker, I am informed that some non-citizens are not able to obtain an affidavit \nor any other document duly sworn or affirmed by them before a court of law in their countries \nof residence, as such mechanism, in fact, is not available in their countries of residence. My \nOffice is working together with the Attorney-General’s Office to amend Section 7 of the \nImmigration Act with a view to allowing a non-citizen to submit another official document \nattesting that on the date of his marriage to the citizen, he was not married to any other person.  \nI must say there was a demand and we are also looking at this. The Attorney-General’s \nOffice will give consideration to the possibility of including Rodrigues as well in that \namendment that we are bringing. \n The Bill will be introduced in the National Assembly shortly. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Hon. Caserne, are you okay? Right! \nThe hon. Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet! \nCASINOS OF MAURITIUS – FINANCIAL SITUATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/564",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 564,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/564) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Casinos of \nMauritius, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the State Investment Corporation \nLtd., information as to the current financial situation thereof.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister:  Madam Speaker, I am informed that the casinos have made \noperating losses of Rs272 million for the financial year ending 30 June 2025 and Rs121 million \nfor the six-month period, that is, from July 2025 to December 2025. \n I should also highlight that the total losses that have been accumulated for the period \n2015 to 2025 amounted to Rs1.9 billion.  \nThe model that casinos have been operating in Mauritius is clearly flawed, Madam \nSpeaker. \nThe chronic losses made by casinos are attributable mainly to the following – \n(i) \nThe Casinos of Mauritius closed Sun Casinos and Beach Casinos Ltd, which \nresulted in massive redeployment of 111 staff to other already overstaffed casinos. \nSo, we had a problem of overstaffing; \n(ii) Despite that the Casinos of Mauritius was systematically making huge losses \nevery year, on 02 September 2024, that is, on the eve of the General Election, the \nmanagement of the casino signed a collective agreement to provide a 14th month \nbonus as productivity bonus, and this, Madam Speaker, was backdated to 02 July \n2022.  The company was making losses, yet they decided to pay a productivity \nbonus on the eve of the election and backdated it to 02 July 2022.   \nThis is how the MSM operated! It is not their money. They could not give a damn. \nSorry, I do not know whether it parliamentary. They could give a care, but they just \nspent. This the method of the MSM. This was the level of incompetence and \nirresponsibility by the previous regime which, therefore, naturally further made the \nsituation worse. All they cared about was to lure voters by dishing out public funds! \nWith a view to maintaining casino operations, SIC has injected funds to the tune of Rs1.3 \nbillion during the period 2015 to 2025.  The latter had to contract debts amounting to Rs771 \nmillion to finance this injection. In addition, I am informed that casinos have arrears amounting \nto Rs262 million as at March 2026.   \n Now, this model of financing the losses of the casinos is clearly, Madam Speaker, \nunsustainable as it entails massive transfers of funds from profitable entities of the SIC to loss \nmaking ones. This mechanism will rapidly reach its limit and the SIC will have to ultimately \nborrow to finance the deficits of the casinos.  This will have a direct bearing on public sector \ndebt and which should be avoided at all costs. \nMadam Speaker, it is not the business of Government to run casinos, especially when it \nhas clearly been making losses over so many years.  As I have already stated in the House, \nGovernment is in the process of disposing the casinos. \nI am informed that, as of today, a Transaction Advisor, namely Price Waterhouse \nCoopers, has already been appointed since February 2026 to provide advisory services for the \ndisinvestment process. The Transaction Advisor has completed the first phase of the \ndisinvestment process by working on an estimated valuation for the casinos. The Transaction \nAdvisor has also prepared an Information Memorandum and an Expression of Interest. The \nlaunching of the Expression of Interest is scheduled for May 2026.  \nThe SIC, Madam Speaker, will have to come up with bold options to address the related \nhuman resource issues arising out of the disposal process of the casinos, including the \npossibility of elaborating an Early Retirement Scheme. \nMadam Speaker: Mr Rookny, yes! \nMr Rookny: Thank you, Madam Speaker. Could the hon. Prime Minister inform the \nHouse if the companies owning the Casinos in Mauritius continue to remain solvent? And up \nto when will the Government continue to inject funds in the lossmaking casinos? \nThe Prime Minister: As I said, Madam Speaker, I do not know. Maybe I am mistaken; \nmaybe the hon. Leader of the Opposition seems to know how many people attend whatever. I \nthink this is the only country in the world where casinos actually lose money! \n(Interruptions) \nYou started the bid. I just told you how many millions you lost when you were in power. \nBut this is precisely why we are relooking at it. This is why we appointed Price \nWaterhouse Coopers, and these are the steps we are doing because it is unsustainable. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Members, before we proceed with the next question, I had the \nfeeling that my previous ruling on the question of giving opinion did not meet the consensus \nin this House. \nI have just checked – because I do not know everything by heart – Standing Order 22 (1) \n(g) – \n“a question shall not ask for an expression of opinion, (…).” \nThat is all I have to say!  \nNext question! Hon. First Member for Vacoas and Floréal! \nGOLDEN VISA SCHEME – INVESTMENT CRITERIA & IMPACT \nASSESSMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/565",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 565,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floreal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/565) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the proposed Golden \nVisa Scheme, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Economic Development \nBoard, information as to – \n(a) \nthe objectives thereof and categories of foreign nationals targeted; \n(b) \nthe rights and incentives attached thereto; \n(c) \nthe minimum investment thresholds, qualifying sectors and due diligence \nmechanisms applicable, and \n(d) \nwhether an assessment of the likely impact thereof on housing affordability for \nMauritian citizens, land ownership patterns, money laundering and illicit financial \nflows risks and job creation and productive investment have been carried out.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, recently, the Economic Development Board \n(EDB) has received multiple enquiries from foreigners who have expressed interest to \nrelocate together with their families to Mauritius.  \nTo respond to this demand, we are introducing a Golden Visa to better meet the \nrequirements of high-net-worth individuals wishing to relocate to Mauritius.  \nThe Golden Visa will be a multiple-entry visa granted to successful applicants and their \nimmediate dependents, that is, their spouse and dependent children. The visa will be \nprocessed within five working days from the date of application and it will be valid for a \nperiod of up to two years and it can be renewed, if need be, if there is a new application.  \nAs regards part (a) of the question, the objective of the Golden Visa Scheme is to \nencourage high-net-worth individuals to relocate physically to Mauritius together with their \nfamilies.  \nThe aim is to maximise the economic benefits to Mauritius through long-term stay of \nGolden Visa Holders and subsequently encourage them to relocate their funds and channel \ninvestments to different sectors of our economy.  \nIn this context, the EDB has set up a dedicated concierge service to assist the high-net-\nworth non-citizens in relocating their businesses to Mauritius, leveraging on our financial \nservices sector, the freeport sector and existing investment schemes. There are also potential \nbenefits in terms of increased foreign direct investment, especially in emerging sectors of our \neconomy such as artificial intelligence and digital services. \nMadam Speaker, high-net-worth individuals exploring investment opportunities in \nMauritius in high-value sectors such as FinTech, global treasury, artificial intelligence, \nbiotechnology, and renewable energy will be targeted. \nAs regards part (b) of the question, Golden Visa holders will be able to – \n(a) \nenrol their children in private educational institutions in Mauritius; \n(b) \nimport their personal belongings and bring their pets; \n(c) \nopen bank accounts in Mauritius, and \n(d) \npay their taxes in Mauritius if they spend 183 days or more in Mauritius while \nbenefitting from tax exemption on expenditure in Mauritius made through foreign \ncredit or debit cards, and on income remitted and deposited into a Mauritian bank \naccount, provided a declaration is made that the applicable tax has already been \npaid abroad. \nHolders of Golden Visas will not automatically be entitled to enter our labour market as \nthey will be expected to invest in qualifying sectors.  \nAs regards part (c), Madam Speaker, Golden Visa Holders will be required to provide a \nwritten undertaking at time of application that they would invest a minimum amount of USD \n1 million within the first 12 months of their stay in Mauritius, and the EDB will be closely \nfollowing up on the progress of their investment.  \nAn application under the Golden Visa will be subjected to a first screening by the EDB \nwhere a due diligence exercise is carried out, including different checks, the World Check and \nso on. The Passport and Immigration Office will perform further due diligence process prior to \nissuing the Visa but all this will have to take place within five working days.  \nAs regards part (d) of the question, Madam Speaker, I am informed that the EDB has \nassessed the potential benefits and risks of the Golden Visa Scheme. \nThe EDB has estimated that some 100 Golden Visas could be issued annually.  \nThe target of the Golden Visa Scheme would be mostly, as I said, high-net-worth \nindividuals, who will later be encouraged to relocate their funds and investment into different \nsectors of our economy.  \nIn this respect, the Ministry of Financial Services and Economic Planning is working on \nmeasures to facilitate the relocation of corporates, re-domiciliation of global companies and \nfunds to Mauritius, as well as family offices, and facilitating the opening of bank accounts.  \nAs regards housing affordability and land ownership, Golden Visa Holders will only be \nallowed to acquire residential properties strictly under the EDB property schemes such as \nProperty Development Scheme, Invest Hotel Scheme and Smart City Scheme.  \nGolden Visa holders would initially be staying in hotels, or renting residential properties \nunder the EDB schemes.  There is therefore, spare capacity in the high-end property rental \nmarket to accommodate these individuals without affecting housing affordability for Mauritian \ncitizens. \nWith respect to the risks of money laundering and illicit financial flows, a robust, risk-\nbased due diligence framework is already in place. The framework is aligned with our Anti-\nMoney Laundering and Combatting the Financing of Terrorism Framework. \nThere is also, Madam Speaker, a strong inter-agency coordination involving the Financial \nCrimes Commission, the Financial Intelligence Unit, the Financial Services Commission, the \nBank of Mauritius, the Passport and Immigration Office and other enforcement agencies that \nwill work effectively to address any risks relating to money laundering and illicit financial \nflows. \nCurrently, Madam Speaker, all our Visa Schemes are compliant with the standards of the \nFinancial Action Taskforce and the OECD’s guidance on potentially high-risk residency and \ncitizenship by investment schemes. \nAccordingly, my Office, the Ministry of Finance, and the EDB will jointly monitor the \nscheme, its outcomes will be looked at, and if need be, corrective measures will be taken to \nensure that it delivers maximum benefit to the economy and our citizens while safeguarding \nour national interests. \nMadam Speaker: Yes? \nMs J. Bérenger: Merci. Concernant le due diligence, l’honorable Premier ministre peut-\nil nous dire la différence dans le mode d’opération de l’actuel gouvernement et celui de l’ancien \nrégime ? Autrement dit, quelle garantie il peut donner à la Chambre qu’on ne verra pas des cas \nsimilaires à ceux de Sobrinho ou Ravatomanga venir cacher leur fortune mal gagnée à \nMaurice ? Quelle est la différence dans le mode d’opération de l’actuel gouvernement et celui \nde l’ancien régime ? \nThe Prime Minister: It is a very good question. We are going to have a different \napproach with different people involved. One of the things we are doing is for the passports – \nit will all be digitalised. We will immediately know whoever person is coming through to \nMauritius. If they have any problem with them, we will immediately know. This is available in \nmany countries including Seychelles today, but we do not have it here, unfortunately. I do not \nknow why. This is one of the things. \nSecondly, the Criminal Agency that we are setting up will have a special section \ndedicated to justice to ensure that no – if I may use the word – crooks manage to go through \nthe net.  \nMadam Speaker: Yes, second question! \nMs J. Bérenger: L’honorable Premier ministre a parlé d’éventuels corrective measures \ndépendant du succès ou pas de ce scheme. Peut-il nous dire quels indicateurs seront utilisés ? \nQuels seront les KPIs pour évaluer le succès ou non de ce scheme ? Est-ce que ils seront évalués \nla quantité d’emplois créés, l’investissement productif contre l’investissement spéculatif ? \nComment est-ce que le succès sera évalué ? \nThe Prime Minister: This is already being done at the moment but we are strengthening \nthe issue. I was especially mentioning in case of people who try to launder money to come here \nand this is what we are putting a lot of emphasis on. We want to ensure that we do not have \nsimilar cases as when the MSM was here with the Sobrinho cases like this. We have to avoid \nthem. \nMs J. Bérenger: Est-ce qu’un plafond sera imposé sur le nombre de biens ou sur la \nsuperficie de terre pouvant être acquis par un détenteur de Golden Visa ? \nMadam Speaker: Superficie! \nThe Prime Minister: I think, I might have mentioned, maybe I did not. They will be \nonly allowed one residence and it will be within the framework that the EDB has already set \nup for different foreigners who want to buy property in Mauritius. It is the same. \nMadam Speaker: She mentioned superficie, hon. Prime Minister. Hon. Prime Minister, \nthe question was on superficie. Dans le scheme il n’y a pas ? \nThe Prime Minister: In the scheme you have whatever the… \nMadam Speaker: There is already… \nThe Prime Minister: Yes, it is already there. \nMadam Speaker: It is taken care of. Okay, good? Next question, hon. Beejan, Second \nMember for Grand Baie and Poudre D'or! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 6 – LAW & ORDER DETERIORATION – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/566",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 566,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/566) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Constituency No. \n6, Grand Baie and Poudre d’Or, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nCommissioner of Police, information as to whether he is in presence of information regarding \nan alleged deterioration of the law and order situation in several localities thereof and, if so, \nindicate the additional measures being taken or being envisaged to address same.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, Constituency No. 6, that is, Grand Baie and \nPoudre d’Or, comprises a mixed coastal, touristic, commercial and residential corridor. It \nextends from Grand Baie, Pereybère, Cap Malheureux, Goodlands, Grand Gaube, Calodyne \ncoastal settlements to Poudre d’Or.  \nI am informed by the Commissioner of Police that, within this spatial configuration, most \nof the reported cases are concentrated in the more high-footfall areas, particularly Grand Baie \nand its surrounding tourist and commercial zones, Goodlands and its adjoining areas, as well \nas certain parts of Cap Malheureux, Grand Gaube and Poudre d’Or. These cases relate mainly \nto larceny, anti-social behaviour, breaches of public order and drug-related activities, including \npossession, trafficking and distribution, as well as illegal cultivation in some areas. \nTo address the situation, the Police have further reinforced their intelligence-led policing \nstrategy across the constituency – \n(i) \nthey have increased high-visibility patrols in identified hotspots, tourist zones \nand commercial corridors; \n(ii) \nthere are regular stop-and-search operations and roadblocks; \n(iii) \nthere are targeted enforcement operations conducted by composite teams \ncomprising the Criminal Investigation Division, the Anti-Drug and Smuggling \nUnit, the Special Mobile Force and the Special Supporting Unit; \n(iv) \nthe continuous monitoring of persons of interest and habitual offenders; \n(v) \nthe systematic use of the Safe City surveillance system for detection and \ndeterrence purposes, and \n(vi) \nsustained community engagement through structured Community Policing \nForums and sensitisation programmes. \nMadam Speaker, through these measures, the Police have taken firm actions against \nperpetrators of various offences across the constituency. These include the arrest of individuals \ninvolved in a range of criminal activities, the disruption of distribution networks, the seizure \nof drugs such as cannabis, heroin and synthetic drugs, as well as the detection and dismantling \nof illegal cultivation sites in isolated areas. I am informed that for the period 01 January 2026 \nto 30 April 2026, a total of 3,658 cases have been reported in this constituency, comprising 153 \ncrimes, 1,112 misdemeanours, 2,354 contraventions and 39 drug-related offences. \nMadam Speaker, the Mauritius Police Force is making continuous efforts and taking all \npossible measures to maintain law and order across the country. In this daunting task, we \nalways say that the active collaboration of members of the public is essential, particularly \nthrough the prompt reporting of suspicious activities and the sharing of credible information to \nassist in the prevention and detection of crime. I should also add, Madam Speaker, that they \nwork with the new National Agency for Drug Control, which we have just set up. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. One question! \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Prime Minister to request \nthe Commissioner of Police to allocate, at the earliest possible, a minimum of two riders, from \nTraffic Branch, to each Police Station, namely Goodlands and Grand Baie on a permanent basis \nso that police officers can intercept motorcyclists or riders evading control in the region? Thank \nyou. \nThe Prime Minister: I just want a clarification. You said two drivers or? \nMadam Speaker: Riders. \nThe Prime Minister: Now, this will depend on whether it is available. I know they are \nabout to launch tenders for motorbikes. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, hon. Ramkalawon! \nMAUBANK LTD – FINANCIAL SITUATION – TRANSFERRED FUNDS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/567",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 567,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/567) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to MauBank Ltd., he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the financial situation thereof, indicating \nthe amount of – \n(a) \nfunds transferred to the Consolidated Fund therefrom during the current financial \nyear, and  \n(b) \nloans contracted by same since its establishment to November 2024.",
      "answer": "The Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, MauBank Ltd is a subsidiary of MauBank \nHoldings Ltd, which, in turn, has the Government of Mauritius as its sole shareholder. \nWith regard to the financial situation of MauBank Ltd, I am informed that the bank \nreported a profit after tax of around Rs829 million for the year ending 30 June 2025. It had \ntotal assets amounting to Rs57.6 billion, total deposit liabilities of Rs50.8 billion, and equity \nand reserves of Rs5.2 billion. \nNow, Madam Speaker, when you look at these figures, you can see that the bank has \nrecorded a profit in 2025, but MauBank Holdings Ltd, which is the main shareholder, registered \na deficit of Rs220 million and had a negative equity of Rs2.5 billion, resulting from \naccumulated losses since its inception in 2015. \nAt the outset, MauBank Ltd had inherited a toxic loan portfolio of approximately Rs5.1 \nbillion. In 2018, this was transferred to a sister company owned by MauBank Holdings Ltd, \nnamely EAMC Ltd.  This carve out allowed MauBank Ltd to show to the public a clean balance \nsheet with profits by removing the non-performing assets. \n Over the years, MauBank Ltd became a den of corruption. A den, Madam Speaker, and \nmismanagement resulting in the paradoxical situation of negative equity in MauBank Holdings \nLtd. \nLet me give you a concrete example, Madam Speaker. Various loans amounting to a total \nof Rs675 million – I hope you are listening, Leader of the Opposition, because you put a \nquestion on 01 May – listen to this! A total of Rs675 million was granted to Kuros Construction \nLtd and the latter was allowed to provide as collateral, believe it or not – what was their \ncollateral? – a State Land given by the Government at Bel Ombre. No proper diligence was \ncarried out prior to the allocation of these loans to Kuros Construction.  Hence, such an \nastronomical loan was granted by the bank against State-owned asset without any personal \ncollateral or whatsoever from the owner/s.  All this was allowed by the duo Premchand Mungur \nand Vishuene Vydelingum. Today, people are asking why it has been removed. Listen to this! \nToday, Kuros still owes. They borrowed Rs675 million. How much do you think they \nstill owe? Rs675 million! In other words, they paid nothing! No collateral and they paid \nnothing. And now, they are in default with MauBank Ltd.  This is the type of largesse which \nwas common under the former regime at the MauBank Ltd. We all know who was pulling the \nstrings from behind considering the nexus between Kuros and the former Finance Minister \nPadayachy. \nHon. Members: Savat dodo! \nAn hon. Member: Alias savat dodo! \nThe Prime Minister: With regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that no funds \nhave been transferred by MauBank Ltd to the Consolidated Fund during the current financial \nyear.  \nOn the contrary, Madam Speaker, it was Government that injected Rs4.1 billion into \nMauBank Holdings Ltd since its inception in 2015 up to November 2024. \n(Interruptions) \nIn addition, MauBank Holdings Ltd had to contract a loan of USD 100 million from the \nAfrican Development Bank Ltd to enable the bank to expand its loan to the SME sector. \nFurthermore, an additional amount of Rs1.1 billion has been injected into MauBank \nHoldings Ltd during this fiscal year to allow it to meet its debt obligations towards the African \nDevelopment Bank Ltd, where it borrowed the money before the elections. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that MauBank Ltd did not contract \nany loans. All borrowings were contracted by the holding company, which is MauBank \nHoldings Ltd. \nMadam Speaker, it is clear that MauBank Holdings Ltd has been the entity shouldering \nthe burden. The dividends paid by MauBank Ltd to MauBank Holdings Ltd were largely \ninsufficient to cover the financial costs of the loan and the servicing obligations. This has \nresulted in a serious deterioration in the financial position of MauBank Holdings Ltd. \nFor the financial year ended 30 June 2025, based on unaudited financial statements, \nMauBank Holdings Ltd had a negative equity of Rs2.95 billion. \nMadam Speaker, taken together, the financial position of MauBank Ltd and MauBank \nHoldings Ltd reflects a situation where operational profit at the bank level was made at the cost \nof the Holding Company and public finances.  Thus, MauBank Ltd was showing a profit while \nthe holding company’s financial situation was really precarious. \nIn this context, several measures are being taken to restore the financial viability of the \nMauBank group of companies.  These include – \n(a) \nthe restructuring of existing debt obligations; \n(b) \nimproving the profitability of MauBank Ltd to enhance its dividend payment \ncapacity;  \n(c) \nthe disposal of non-core assets, and \n(d) \nthe recovery of the carved out non-performing loans. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, one question.  \nMr Ramkalawon: Can the hon. Prime Minister state whether Government has appointed \na Transaction Advisor to find any potential buyer of MauBank Ltd., and if any potential buyer \nhas been identified? Thank you.  \nThe Prime Minister: I believe they are looking at this. But who would want to buy a \nbank with that kind of debt? \nMadam Speaker: Yes, Dr. Aumeer, last question! \nDr. Aumeer: Can I ask the hon. Prime Minister, in the light of the disturbing information \nthat he has shared in the House regarding Kuros Ltd., whether he intends to have a specific \nforensic enquiry about it and in the meantime, freeze the assets of that company? \nThe Prime Minister: The assets are already frozen. We are looking at all the things I \nmentioned because we cannot let people get away with murder like this. They will have to \nanswer for their deeds.  \nMadam Speaker: Time is, unfortunately, over!  \nNow, the Table has been advised that the following PQs have been withdrawn: B/568, \nB/569, B/570, B/571, B/572, B/576, and B/577. \nQuestions addressed to hon. Ministers! \nYes, Hon. Third Member for Port-Louis South and Port-Louis Central.  \nE-HEALTH PROJECT – IMPLEMENTATION & OPERATIONALITY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/568",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 568,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/568) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the proposed \nintroduction of the Freedom of Information Bill in the Assembly, he will state where matters \nstand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nNATIONAL MARITIME ZONE – MONITORING – NATIONAL COAST GUARD \nSTATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/569",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 569,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/569) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nPrime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the national maritime \nzone, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information \nas to the – \n(a) \nsystems currently in place for the monitoring thereof, indicating whether same are \ndeemed adequate, and  \n(b) \nnumber of existing National Coast Guard stations, indicating their respective \nlocations and in each case, the number of personnel posted thereat and helicopters \nand vessels at the disposal thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nPRIVATE SECURITY SERVICE PROVIDER LICENCE – REGISTERED HOLDERS \n– APPLICATIONS – AVERAGE PROCESSING TIME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/570",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 570,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/570) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to the Private Security Service Provider Licence, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the current number of registered \nholders thereof, indicating the – \n(a) \nnumber of new and renewal applications for the issue thereof – \n(i) \npending over the past five years, and  \n(ii) \napproved over the past two years, and  \n(b) \naverage time taken for the processing of applications for the issue of new or for the \nrenewal thereof, indicating the reasons for delays, if any, in the processing thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMR A.C.P & TWIN BROTHER – ARREST – REASONS & CIRCUMSTANCES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/571",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 571,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/571) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to Mr A.C.P arrested \non or about 03 April 2026 and the subsequent arrest of his twin brother, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain information as to – \n(a) \nthe reasons therefor and circumstances thereof, indicating the items seized in the \ncourse thereof and whether same include illicit drugs and, if so, give details thereof, \nand  \n(b) \nwhether they are currently subjected to objections to departure.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGEOPOLITICAL TENSION – FINANCIAL YEAR 2025-2026 – PUBLIC DEBT RISE \n– BORROWED SUMS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/572",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 572,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/572) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d’Or) asked \nthe Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister \nof Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to public debt, he will \nstate whether same is on the rise beyond the estimated figure for financial year 2025-2026 due \nto the actual global geopolitical tension and imported inflation and, if so, give the list of the \ncreditors in relation thereto together with the corresponding sums borrowed, in each case.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS – TOTAL GROSS INFLOWS –\nENCOURAGEMENT MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/573",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 573,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "B/573\nThe Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart \n(Dr Prayag) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,   \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –   \n \nWhether, in regard to incidents of objects pelting within \ncorrectional facilities, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain from the Commissioner of Prisons, information as to \nthe number of reported cases thereof over the past three \nyears, on a yearly basis, indicating the (a) circumstances and \nlocations \nwhere \nsame \nmost \nfrequently \noccur \nand  \n(b) measures taken or being envisaged to address same? \n \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                     PAGE 5 of 24 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/574",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 574,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "B/574\nThe Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand \nRiver South East (Mr Baboolall) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,   \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –   \n \nWhether, in regard to bookmakers’ licences, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain from the Gambling Regulatory \nAuthority (GRA), information as to (a) the number thereof \nissued since 2025 to date to (i) individuals and (ii) companies, \nindicating in each case whether the licence granted is for \noperation inside or outside the race course and (b) whether \nthe GRA has established its own regulatory monitoring \nsystem and, if not, why not?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/575",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 575,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Dr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "B/575\nThe Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand \nRiver South East (Dr Saumtally) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence,   \nHome Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, \nMinister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands –   \n \nWhether, in regard to drug abuse and trafficking in the \nvillages of Caroline, Bel Air and other localities within \nConstituency No. 10, Montagne Blanche and Grand River \nSouth East, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \nthe Commissioner of Police, information as to the number of \nreported cases thereof over the past three years, on a yearly \nbasis, indicating the (a) number of arrests effected in \nconnection therewith and (b) additional measures taken and \nbeing envisaged to combat same?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/576",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 576,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/576) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External \nCommunications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in \nregard to Foreign Direct Investments, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nEconomic Development Board, information as to the – \n(a) \ntotal gross inflows thereof recorded since 2023 to date, giving a breakdown thereof \non a yearly basis, sector-wise and from which countries, and \n(b) \nmeasures taken and/or contemplated to encourage same in emerging sectors.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFAIR SHARE CONTRIBUTION – REVENUE PROJECTIONS, TARGETED \nINDIVIDUALS & COMPANIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/577",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 577,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floreal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "question": "(No. B/577) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the Prime \nMinister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister of \nFinance, Minister for Rodrigues and Outer Islands whether, in regard to the Fair Share \nContribution as announced in the Budget Speech 2025-2026 and subsequently amended \nfollowing representations from stakeholders, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from \nthe Mauritius Revenue Authority, information as to the – \n(a) \ntotal amount of revenue initially projected under the original measure;  \n(b) \nrevised amount of revenue expected following the subsequent amendments, and  \n(c) \nnumber of individual taxpayers and companies expected to be liable under the \noriginal and revised schemes, respectively.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMUDDY/MURKY WATER SUPPLY – COMPLAINTS – REASONS & \nREMEDIAL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/578",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 578,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/578) Dr F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the E-Health Project, \nhe will state – \n(a)  whether provision has been made for the incorporation therein of the full clinical \ncycle of the patients, and \n(b)  the public healthcare institution, if any, where same is fully operational and the \nexpected date of deployment and operationalisation thereof in all the public \nhealthcare institutions.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, the e-Health Project is currently being implemented by \nmy Ministry under a comprehensive portfolio approach in close collaboration with the United \nNation Development Programme.  \nThe project is being implemented in phases with a view to improving healthcare delivery, \nstrengthening data management and enhancing service efficiency across public healthcare \ninstitutions. \nMadam Speaker, it is important to recall that e-Health Project was initially launched in \n2022, following the signature of a portfolio agreement with the UNDP, which was appointed \nas implementing partner with full responsibility for the procurement process as well as the \noverall project management. In this context, the UNDP has, since inception, and to date been \nmanaging the procurement cycle of the implementation of the project with dedicated technical \nand administrative personnel deployed for this purpose in accordance with the agreement \nentered into by the previous government.  \nWhile the project was intended to support the digital transformation of the public health \nsector, its implementation was marked by a number of operational, technical and coordination \nchallenges due to gaps in planning, insufficient ground work, and limited oversight by the \nprevious government. \nIt is to be noted that these challenges were compounded by unresolved operational issues, \nparticularly in relation to site readiness, including electrical works and connectivity. These \nconstraints had been flagged by the UNDP to the previous administration. However, they \nremained largely unaddressed, thereby contributing to delays in the implementation of the \nproject.  \nWhen I assumed office in November 2024, I observed that despite the lapse of nearly \ntwo years since the official launch of the project, progress remained limited and the initiative \nwas still at the stage of user requirement gathering. This clearly indicated delays in moving the \nproject towards actual implementation.  \nUpon assuming office, my Ministry took immediate and decisive actions to salvage the \nproject and accelerate its implementation. The user requirement phase was expedited and \nconcrete steps were taken to transition the project into its implementation phase with a clear \nfocus on delivery and tangible outcomes.  \nMadam Speaker, Phase 1 focuses on the deployment of foundational modules that \nestablish the necessary digital infrastructure to support patient and health service management. \nThe core modules include Patient Administration System (PAS), manages the administrative \nlife cycle of patients, including registration, admission, discharge and transfer process.  \ne-Health portal and mobile application provide a digital interface for patients and \nhealthcare providers to access health services, personal medical information and appointment \nscheduling. Blood Transfusion Service (BTS) and donor management application support end-\nto-end management of blood donations, donor records and transfusion processes.  \nReporting analytics facilitate real-time data aggregation, dashboard and performance \nmonitoring to support evidence-based decision-making and health system governance.  \nLaboratory information management system integration with the e-Health system and \ndeployment across wards to enable electronic test ordering with automated transmission of \nresults from laboratory analysis to wards and patients where required. The testing phase started \non 23 August 2025 at New Flacq Hospital, which was the most advanced in terms of site \npreparedness. The system is already live at the hospital and in several associated primary \nhealthcare facility for that region, including Bel Air Mediclinic, Bélvedère Mediclinic, \nBramsthan Area Health Centre, Medine Camp de Masque Community Health Centre.  \nMadam Speaker, an inter-ministerial committee, co-chaired by my colleague, the hon. \nMinister of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation and myself, meets on a \nregular basis and is attended by representatives of my Ministry, Ministry of Information \nTechnology, Communication and Innovation as well as the consortium with a view to fast-\ntracking implementation and addressing operational challenges in real time.  \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (a) of the question, I wish to inform the House that \nprovision has been made for the incorporation of a full clinical cycle of outpatients within the \ne-Health system. The system had been designed as a comprehensive digital health solution to \nmanage patient journey from registration up to appointment scheduling, clinical consultation, \nlaboratory investigation, medication and follow up.  \nFrom the very beginning of our mandate, my Ministry in coordination with the Minister \nof Information Technology, Communication and Innovation, engaged with UNDP and \nsuccessfully renegotiated scope of Phase I to include three critical modules at no additional \ncost to government with a view to providing a fully paperless patient experience at the earliest \npossible stage.  \nAs such, nurses, doctors and pharmacy modules have been incorporated to ensure a fully \npaperless patient experience at the earlier possible stage, namely vitals capture, the physician \nmodule and the pharmacy module.  \nIn the present phase, the system’s architecture and deployed modules include inter alia \npatients’ registration and identity management, appointment scheduling, outpatient clinical \nconsultation, capturing of doctors’ notes, chief complaints, medical examination, vital signs \nand clinical data, pharmacy and medication list, medical files tracking, hospital workflow, \nincluding admission, discharges and transfers, as well as integration with the laboratory \ninformation management system.   \nThe system also includes specific clinical templates for departments, such as cardiology, \ndermatology, general medicine, general surgery, nephrology, and other speciality to cater for \nspecific departmental and clinical requirements. The overall objective is to establish a single \nsource of proof for patients’ records so as to ensure continuity of care, facilitated clinical \ndecision-making and improved patients’ outcome.  \nMadam Speaker, with regard to part (b) of the question, I am informed that the e-Health \nsystem, as I have just described, is presently live and operational in selected public healthcare \ninstitutions across different regions. However, at this stage, no public healthcare institution is \nfully operational in all aspects of the full clinical cycle as implementation is being carried out \nprogressively and in a phased manner. \nIt is important to note that based on experts’ advice and international best practice, a \nproject of this scale and complexity cannot be implemented in a single step or at one point in \ntime. Such systems are typically rolled out progressively in phases across multiple sites to allow \nfor proper testing and user training system stabilisation and continuous improvement before \nfull nationwide deployment.  \nAs at 30 April 2026, the system has been deployed in selected facilities across regions, \nNew Flacq Hospital, Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital and Victoria Hospital. The application has so \nfar recorded more than 126,000 patients’ registrations, 225,000 patients’ visit and 221,000 \ndoctors’ consultation. \nMadam Speaker, roll out has also started in other facilities including those in region four, \nJawaharlal Nehru Hospital, region five, Victoria Hospital while preparatory activities have \nbeen initiated in region one, Dr. Jeetoo Hospital, and two, Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam \nNational Hospital including champion user training and configuration exercises.  \nThe roll out schedule depends on site readiness and electrical works, UPX installation, \npower points connectivity, Government internet and networking services, provisioning cyber \nsecurity audit and retesting requirement as well as operational resource gaps.  \nMadam Speaker, the roll out is expected to be completed in –  \nregion three – New Flacq Hospital by May 2026; \nregion four – Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital by September 2026, and  \nregion two – Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam National Hospital in March 2027.  \nThe timeline for region one, Dr. Jeetoo Hospital, and region five, Victoria Hospital, are \nexpected by December 2027 subject to the completion of electrical works and connectivity \nrequirements. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you. Yes, one supplementary, please. \nDr. Aumeer: I have two, if you allow me, please. \nMadam Speaker: Two is okay. \nDr. Aumeer: May I ask the hon. Minister whether he could indicate to the House if the \nclinical data and the electronic records that would be generated with the E-Health systems will \nbe legally admissible in our court system particularly in the world of medical litigation in which \nwe are living right now, and if so, under which legal provisions? Thank you. \nMr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, well I am not a lawyer but definitely, we seeking the advice \nof the State Law Office.  \nThe State Law Office will have to advise us on the step that we have to take but as far as \nI am aware, for the time being, they are not doing anything illegal. \nMadam Speaker: You will do the needful. Yes. \nDr. Aumeer: Last one. Thank you, hon. Minister. Could you inform the House of the \nspecific measures or specific sensitisation campaign and communication strategies that have \nbeen put in place so that the public at large may benefit from the usage of the E-Health services, \nparticularly, our hon. Minister of ICT who could help with having an App so that every single \nperson at home can definitely have access not even to his medical records but, particularly, to \nall the medical test that he has conducted so that they can take efficient measures to correct \nthat. \nThank you. \n Mr Bachoo: Madam Speaker, it is fact anything new that we do, anything new that we \nintroduce, we are met with certain opposition in the beginning. My first step has been to win \nover the doctors, first of all, – doctors and the medical and paramedical staff. Once you get \nthem in confidence, then everything becomes possible. So, I get the feeling now that doctors, \nthe paramedical staff, the medical staff are for the project. In the beginning there was stiff \nresistance. \nSecondly, patients also, in the beginning when they come, they had to wait a little bit but \nslowly, and slowly, now, they are getting accustomed to it and with the support of the hon. \nMinister of Information Technology. \nMadam Speaker: IT. \nMr Bachoo: I do hope, I am going to attain. I can assure the House that this has been \ngoing on for years, and years, and years. That started in 2013 when our hon. Prime Minister, \nwhen he had started that project, up till now nothing has happened but I can assure the House \nby next year if you ask me the same question, I will tell you we are nearing completion. \nMadam Speaker: On va vivre avec notre temps. \nMs Anquetil: C’est intéressant seulement. \nMadam Speaker: Yes. Yes.  \nMr François: One. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, but you ask me, do not show me a piece of paper because I do \nnot understand. I think, you are asking someone to get a message. \nMr François: Okay, thank you. Thank you, Madam Speaker. May I ask the hon. Minister \nwhether, in the user requirement gathering process, there is or there has been discussion with \nthe Health Commission in Rodrigues especially with regard to the transfer and admission of \npatients from Rodrigues and whether, the existing E-Health in Rodrigues is compatible with \nthe one in Mauritius. \nMr Bachoo: No, not necessarily. We had discussions with my colleague, the hon. \nMinister of Information Technology, and in our forthcoming meetings, we are going to raise \nup the issue and I can assure the hon. Member that Rodrigues is also in our heart. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, good. \nMr François: Thank you. \nMadam Speaker: I am not. Well, let us see. Let us see. You have one more?  \nDr. Aumeer: One last. \nMadam Speaker: Okay. \nDr. Aumeer: Very important. \nMadam Speaker: Otherwise, I will be told that I am one sided. \nDr. Aumeer: May I ask the hon. Minister the issue of confidentiality when it comes to \ne-Health which has been implemented in the private sector for the last 6-7 years, in particularly \none group, has faced enormous difficulties and concern about the personal records of patient \nthat is being shared out. \nMadam Speaker: Your question! \nDr. Aumeer: Can the hon. Minister ensure the House and public at large how \nconfidentiality of patient can be preserved particularly, with the number of hackers that we \nhave in the community.  \nMr Bachoo: This issue was raised on many occasions but I was given assurance by my \ncolleague, the hon. Minister of Information Technology and also, by the expert of UNDP that \neverything will be done to see to it that the privacy of the patient will not be disclosed. \nMadam Speaker: Okay, hon. Ramdass!  \nOVERSEAS MEDICAL TREATMENT – FUNDS COLLECTION – \nAUTHORISED INSTITUTION/ORGANISATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/579",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 579,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/579) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to patients requiring overseas \nmedical treatment, he will state whether any institution and/or organisation is authorised to \ncollect funds on behalf of the said patients to fund the said medical treatment. \nMadam Speaker: That would be the last question for the morning.  \nYes. Oh, hon. Minister, this is the question where you want to put three in one?",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Three in one, yes. \nMadam Speaker: I think, maybe… \nMr Bachoo: Please bear with me, I will be very fast. \nMadam Speaker: I do not think you will manage in five minutes. No. Why do we not \nbreak now. \nMr Bachoo: Yes. \n Madam Speaker: And then, you can do that at the beginning when everybody has eaten \nand everything. \nMr Bachoo: Okay, thank you. \nMadam Speaker: Let me break now, please. Thank you very much. We come back at \n2.30 p.m. \n At 12.55 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 2.30 p.m. with the Deputy Speaker in the Chair. \n The Deputy Speaker: Please be seated!  \n Hon. Bachoo, you had the floor. Yes, hon. Bachoo! The question has already been put. \n Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with your permission, I am replying to \nParliamentary Questions B/579, B/589 and B/615 together as they relate to more or less the \nsame subject matter. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, my Ministry provides financial assistance to patients requiring \nmedical treatment not available in Mauritius as follows – \n(a) \nChild Cancer Scheme with unlimited financial assistance to young patients up to \nthe age of 25 years suffering from cancer,  \n(b) \nPaediatric Scheme with similar assistance to children up to the age of 25 years \nrequiring treatment for other diseases and financial assistance up to Rs1,300,000 \nfor treatment overseas to patients who cannot be treated locally, to all patients \nirrespective of age, subject to the household income not exceeding Rs200,000 a \nmonth. \nThe financial assistance is granted to patients based on the recommendation of a medical \nboard whose mandate is to assess the condition of the patient and to submit a report to \ndetermine if treatment is available in our public health institutions locally or whether same \nwarrants treatment in private health institutions locally or abroad, the urgency of treatment \nrequired and whether the patient will benefit from the treatment. Prior to sending patients \nabroad, my Ministry seeks treatment plans and quotation from all hospitals with which we have \nMemorandum of Understanding in India. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that there are private organizations that provide \nassistance to Mauritian patients who may not be eligible for financial assistance, that is, in \ncases where the household income exceeds Rs200,000 monthly or the treatment may be \navailable locally or may not be beneficial to the patient.  \nI am also informed that these organizations also send Mauritian patients for treatment \nabroad, although the medical board has not recommended such treatments due to their medical \nconditions, particularly their fitness for travel abroad.  \nWith regard to organizations collecting funds on behalf of patients, I am informed that \nsuch collection is governed by Public Collections Act and as such all applications for public \ncollections must be made to the Commissioner of Police. \n There are a number of organizations which are exempt from the provisions of the Act. \nHowever, institutions sending patients abroad are not exempted. I am further informed that \nbefore granting permission for collection of funds, the Commissioner of Police seeks the views \nof my Ministry. My Ministry informs the Commissioner of Police as to whether any financial \nassistance has been granted or otherwise. I am also informed by the Commissioner of Police \nthat applications to raise funds for patients requiring treatment are entertained only by \nindividuals and not by Corporate Bodies. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as a Minister, I have personally received several complaints \nabout some associations which sent patients abroad for treatment and I cannot ignore those \ncomplaints. Some of those complaints relate to terminally ill cancer patients being sent abroad \nwith little realistic prospect of benefit, only for their families to be confronted with \nastronomical and unsustainable costs. \nPatients spending their final days in foreign countries, away from their loved ones and in \ndistressing circumstances where families must struggle both financially and administratively, \nto repatriate the deceased. \n Undisclosed commission being received by these organizations from foreign hospitals \nin addition to the fees charged locally, allegations of collision with certain specialists leading \nto patients being misled regarding treatment options and being sent abroad. A total lack of \ntransparency in pricing, referral pathways and outcomes and instances of illegal public \ncollection of funds exploiting vulnerability and goodwill of the population. My Ministry is \ntaking action to refer these complaints to appropriate competent authorities for necessary \naction. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, these are not isolated anecdotes. They point to a systemic \nweakness and potential abuses in a sector that directly affect the lives and dignity of our \ncitizens. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I must state with a sense of responsibility and urgency that \nat present, these organizations operate in a completely regulatory vacuum. It is regrettably yet \nanother area which has been left unregulated for years, a veritable jungle as a consequence of \nthe lack of foresight and policy direction of the previous administration.  \nTheir approach, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, was to encourage the development of a lucrative \nprivate health facilitation ecosystem often at the expense of strengthening our public health \nservices and without putting in place the necessary safeguards to protect patients. As matters \nstand today, my Ministry has no statutory oversight over the operations of these organizations. \nThey do not fall within the existing legal definition of regulated health institutions. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is precisely for these reasons that urgent action is required. I \nwish to inform the House that my Ministry will approach the Attorney General's Office and all \nrelevant ministries with a view to bringing forward appropriate legislative amendments to \nregulate these activities.  \nIn particular, it is being considered that the appropriate Private Health Institutions Act \nmust be amended so as to bring these organizations within a formal regulatory framework and \nthere will be discussions for these provisions to be introduced for the forthcoming Finance Bill \n2026, given the urgency and the financial implications involved. Failing that, a stand-alone \namendment will be introduced without delay.  \nThis reform is not merely administrative; it is about protecting vulnerable patients, \nrestoring trust and ensuring that no Mauritian is exploited at a time of illness and distress. The \nsituation as it stands, is untenable. We cannot allow a system to persist where life and death \ndecisions are influenced in an opaque, unregulated and potentially exploitative environment.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to late E.G.N. also known as Ras Natty Baby, aged \n72 years, I am informed that he was admitted at Dr. A.G. Jeetoo Hospital on 23rd March 2026 \nwith a serious medical condition along with comorbidities. The late patient was admitted in the \nMedical Intensive Care Unit and was managed by a multi-disciplinary team of five specialists. \nHe was kept under close observation and appropriate treatment was administered. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, during his admission at Dr. Jeetoo Hospital, a number of \nvisitors including Junior Ministers, hon. Fabrice David, hon. Veronique Leu-Govind, hon. \nMarie Anabelle Savabaddy visited him. In addition, I also contacted him to inquire about his \nhealth status. The Regional Health Director was also constantly overseeing the treatment \nprovided to the patient. \n Due to the seriousness of his condition in the Medical ICU, the treating doctors \nrecommended to refer the case abroad after he is completely stabilized. I would like to inform \nthe House that even the hon. Prime Minister inquired from me, about the health status of late \nRas Natty Baby. The hon. Prime Minister also spoke to the patient on phone to reassure him of \nall assistance that Government will provide him with. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am also informed that on or about 6th April 2026, several \nmembers of a private organization visited the patient in MICU at Dr. Jeetoo Hospital during \nvisiting hours. On 08 April 2026, while the patient was still in ICU awaiting medical fitness \nfor air travel, one of his close relatives unexpectedly signed a discharge against medical advice, \nthat is, DAMA. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am also informed that the Overseas Medical Care Assistance, \nOMCA, made arrangements for the transfer of the patient to Park Hospital, Haryana, India \nwhere he was admitted on 9th April 2026.  \nThe patient was certified fit to travel by a medical practitioner from OMCA and was \ntransferred without any accompanying relative because in such cases, in extreme cases, they \nare bound to be accompanied by one of their relatives. But here, there were no relatives who \naccompanied the patient. The close relatives have complained that they were not made aware \nof the treatment given to late Ras Natty Baby, nor was their consent sought for any surgical \nintervention. Unfortunately, late Ras Natty Baby passed away on 26 April 2026.  \nOn 27 April 2026, my Ministry received a request from our High Commission in New \nDelhi for a No Objection Certificate to facilitate the repatriation of the mortal remains. The \nsaid certificate was issued by my Ministry on 28 April 2026 to Eli and Sons Funeral Services \nwithout delay. I was also made aware that OMCA had launched a public collection through \nsocial media to meet the cost of repatriation amounting to some Rs200,000. On the other hand, \nthe family members of late Ras Natty Baby contacted a Member of Parliament on our side to \nseek financial assistance from Government regarding the repatriation.  \nOn 27 April 2026, at around 4.00 p.m., one Member of Parliament, hon. Junior Minister, \nMrs Leu-Govind, who was in close contact with the relatives of late Ras Natty Baby, informed \nthat the relatives were seeking financial help from Government for repatriation of his remains. \nOn the same day, Government agreed to take charge of all the expenses. On 28 April 2026, \naround 12.45 hours, I received a note from the Parliamentary Member that OMCA expressed \nits inability to pay the hospital fees, being given that only Rs100,000 was collected for his \ntreatment. That is according to OMCA. At around 1.00 p.m., Government, acting in good faith, \nagreed to pay for the total hospital and repatriation fees in respect of late Ras Natty Baby.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is also noted that the estimated cost of medical treatment \nclaimed by Park Hospital amounted to some Rs1,120,000, while additional amount of \nRs80,000 was quoted by Arham Ambulance Services for repatriation of the body to Mauritius. \nOn 28 April 2026, our High Commission in New Delhi was informed that all costs relating to \nthe repatriation would be met by my Ministry. It is also to be highlighted that Mission had \nalready instructed its bank to make necessary arrangements to effect the relevant payment to \nPark Hospital. It is only at this stage, when this information was already made public, that \nOMCA informed Park Hospital that since it had sent the patient for treatment, it would take \ncharge of all expenses, including the repatriation of the corpse.  \nHowever, on 29 April 2026, our Mission in New Delhi informed my Ministry that Park \nHospital would hand over the corpse to OMCA Foundation, which admitted late Ras Natty \nBaby and that arrangements for repatriation would be coordinated by OMCA accordingly. Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, following subsequent communication from the hospital, our Mission \ninstructed the bank to withhold the payment pending further clarification. The bank is taking \nnecessary steps to ensure that the transaction is reversed and that the funds are restored to the \nMission's account. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Ramdass first! Then, I will come to you. \nMr Ramdass: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. I understand from the hon. Minister's \nreply that due consideration will now be given to the introduction of a legal framework to \nregulate the activities of these organisations. However, in view of the number of complaints \nreceived, as stated by the hon. Minister himself, if there have been any malpractices, and it \nwould appear that there have been, would the hon. Minister consider the possibility of having \nthe matter referred to the investigative authorities, such as the FCC or the Police in order for a \nproper investigation to be carried out and for action to be taken, if any? \nMr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in the beginning, we were having rumours \neverywhere. People were murmuring against that institution, but no one had the guts and the \ncourage to come forward. I was also informed that a few cases – this is the information I have \n– were reported to the FCC, but no action up till now had been taken. But after the death of late \nRas Natty Baby, after his death, then, I have seen there have been many complaints coming up, \nand people have even started writing letters.  \nWell, I cannot pass judgment on those allegations which are being made, but, definitely, \nI can assure the hon. Member that all these letters will be submitted to the authorities concerned. \nI can assure the House that no stone will be left unturned in order to see to it that such type of \npractices do not occur in our country. I get the impression that we are having a parallel Ministry \nof Health in office in our own country. So, this has to be discouraged. That is the reason why \nwe have to legislate against them.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Ramdass! \nMr Ramdass: One last question. Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. In so far as the \npatient, late Ras Natty Baby is concerned, I understand that as per the reply of the hon. Minister, \nthe patient proceeded overseas unaccompanied by any relative. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Put your question! Put your question! \nMr Ramdass: So, in that case, could the hon. Minister enlighten the House as to who \nsigned the consent form in order for the additional treatment to be administered to the patient?  \nMr Bachoo: Well, I am informed that, in fact, from Mauritius, a DAMA was signed by \nhis son. But in India, who signed the consent form, we have no information about it. That is \nnot known. But the parents and the relatives have complained that they were not even made \naware of what type of operation was being undertaken and what type of treatment was being \nadministered to that patient. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Beechook, yes! \nMr Beechook: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Can the hon. Minister refer the \nfollowing matter to the Medical Council, given the fact that five specialists from the Ministry \nof Health did not give the authorisation for the patient to fly to India for overseas treatment? \nAnother doctor who is employed by the OMCA Foundation gave the authorisation to go abroad \nfor medical treatment. Can this matter be referred to the Medical Council? \nMr Bachoo: I will certainly do it. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Aumeer! \nDr. Aumeer: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. May I ask the hon. Minister, \nconsidering the increasing number of unfounded, unrealistic, unproven medical treatments \nbeing proposed to innocent victims by many of these organisations, will your Ministry \nundertake in the short term to have a one-stop shop to advise people as to what sort of \ntreatments are really feasible and what are those that are being taken on a ride just for the \npurpose of people making money? Thank you. \nMr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the hon. Member being himself an excellent, top-\nranking doctor of the country, knows – of course, I am not blowing his trumpet. But this is a \nfact – very well that when somebody, let us say, has fourth stage cancer, normally, our \nGovernment, our authority does not allow him to travel. But here, we find that many dozens of \nsuch cases where all of us know what will be the end result. But, unfortunately, they exploit \nthe weakness of these people who really want to save their lives. So, such people fall prey to \nsuch organisations.  \nI can assure the hon. Member that we are going to issue an official communiqué also, till \nsuch time that the law is amended to warn the public not to fall into the trap of such \norganisations. These organisations, I get the feeling, are mushrooming now in our country. \nInstead of one, there are two, and now, there are three or four. \nThe Deputy Speaker: You have answered the question. One last question on this topic \nby hon. Dr. Prayag. \n(Interruptions) \nNo, no! I have asked hon. Dr. Prayag. You have had your chance! \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, Deputy Speaker, Sir. Would the hon. Minister consider, on an \nurgent basis, to change modalities for visitors to go to the hospital and to visit patients, \nespecially those admitted in the ICU, or to make it formal so that all visitors give their names, \nso that people know who are visiting ICUs? Especially those who are not immediate relatives. \nThank you. \nMr Bachoo: During visiting hours, it becomes a bit difficult to know who is coming, \nwhether he really a doctor or he is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Such people do come! But I will \ntry to assure the House that we are going to keep a register.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. First Member for Rodrigues. \nJICA BLUE ECONOMY PROJECT – LIVELIHOOD IMPACT & BENEFICIARY \nGROUPS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/580",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 580,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/580) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to the \nImprovement of Livelihood of Coastal Communities through the Sustainable Development of \nBlue Economy, JICA Project, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the \n– \n(a) \nexpected outcomes thereof, particularly, in terms of livelihood diversification, food \nsecurity and inclusive economic growth, and  \n(b) \nfishermen and coastal communities targeted thereunder, in the short, medium and \nlong term, respectively.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: Thank you very much, hon. Member.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, first and foremost, I wish to pay tribute to those Mauritians, who \nspared no effort and acted promptly on the forefront to mitigate the negative ecological impact \nfollowing the grounding of MV Wakashio on 25 July 2020 and the resulting tragic oil spill.  \nIn August 2020, Japan dispatched expert under the Japan Disaster Relief Framework. \nRecovery efforts were undertaken swiftly. Thereafter, a two-month survey highlighted the \nurgent need to clean and restore the impacted coastal ecosystem, strengthen inshore fisheries \nresource management, and improve the livelihood of our fishers and local communities.  \nIn January 2021, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Mauritius formally requested Japan's \nassistance for a project aimed at improving the livelihood of coastal communities through the \nsustainable development of the blue economy. The project implemented by the Japan \nInternational Cooperation Agency was launched in May 2022 and completed in April 2026. It \ndelivered on four major outcomes – \nFirst, practical option to improve livelihood were introduced. An intensive seafood \nprocessing training programme was implemented to ensure a major shift from traditional \nfishing models to the diversification of the skills of fishers and their families. Fishers received \ntraining in fish freshness control, after catches and the onward filleting, salting, vacuum \npacking, and overall quality management.  \nA fully equipped mobile kitchen trailer was also donated to fishers, allowing the \nmarinating of fish or squids, and making fries for on-sale of high-end fish products. The fishers \nparticipated in the regatta in Trou d'Eau Douce and Mahebourg. The trailer and other equipment \nhave been handed over to the Ministry and is under the responsibility of the Fisheries Protection \nService.  \nThe Mauritius Fishermen Cooperative Federation will coordinate with the Fisheries \nProtection Service for daily operation and management, booking and scheduling, cleaning, \nsupervision, and reporting to the Ministry.  \n81 fishers participated in the seafood processing training. In this context, a certificate \naward ceremony was held on 27 April 2026 to mark the successful completion of the training.  \nSecond, diversification of fishery resources was pursued. Being given the vulnerability \nof the lagoon, training in offshore fishing techniques was imparted to 47 fishers of the region, \nusing the newly provided vessel to the Ministry to tap into deep sea species such as the \ndiamondback squid.  \nKitchen gardens and seaweed-based composting was also introduced in Bambous \nVirieux. Sea urchin fattening and seagrass paper production were also undertaken.  \nThird, fishery resource management in the lagoon was strengthened. The project \nprioritised community-specific strategies for ongoing projection of videos at fisheries posts, \nreaching 894 registered fishers, with 29,800 cumulative views.  \nSensitisation ecosystem approach to fisheries, fishery sustainability coupled with intense \nawareness campaign on associated legal framework were also carried out.  \nFourth, the comprehensive livelihood improvement plans were drafted for key regions to \nensure the unique cultural and geographic strength of each village were utilised. Now, these \nincluded fish processing, sea urchin fattening, kitchen gardens, composting, seagrass paper \nproduction, and integration of fisheries with tourism ensuring women's participation and \ncommunity level value addition as follows – \n(a) \n A “catch less, earn more” approach has been developed for Mahebourg region \nthrough the fish processing and distribution, sea urchin fattening in collaboration \nwith divers.  \n(b) \nFor Bambous Virieux kitchen garden, seaweed-based compost, fish processing and \ndistribution have been recommended.  \n(c) \nIn the case of Grand River South East, it has been proposed to transform fisheries \nfrom a secondary activity to a primary activity, through fish processing and \ndistribution, sea urchin fattening, kitchen garden, and seagrass paper.  \n(d) \nValue addition fisheries, integration of fisheries and tourism, catch and cook \nexperiences and women-led processing activities have been recommended for Trou \nd'Eau Douce.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in future, JICA is expected to scale up the successful pilot \nprojects being carried out. Opportunities also exist for the Ministry to submit further proposals \nto JICA for funding and assistance. JICA, along with local communities in Vieux Grand Port, \nare working together to establish a model eco-village. This project includes the greening of the \nvillage, sensitisation on marine environment, promoting handicraft and establishing mangrove \nand kayak trails.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (b) of the question, the fishers and coastal \ncommunities, targeted in the short, medium and long term, are those in Mahebourg, Bambous \nVirieux, Grand River South East, and Trou d'Eau Douce. 81 fishers and their families have \nbeen successfully trained under this project. This batch include 26 fishers from Mahebourg and \nsame number from Bambous Virieux, along with 20 fishers from Grand River South East, and \nnine from Trou d'Eau Douce. 47 fishers have also been trained in off-lagoon fishing, aiming \ntuna and squids. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes! \nQUATRE BORNES – TRAFFIC SCHEME REVIEW",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/581",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 581,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/581) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the persistent traffic congestion in the \ntown of Quatre Bornes, he will state whether consideration will be given for the preparation of \na comprehensive Master Plan to review the traffic scheme thereat and, if so, give details thereof \nand, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it is clear that the current traffic \nsituation in Quatre Bornes is inextricably linked to the light rail system which operates at an \nat-grade, meaning ground level, with the local traffic. We must candidly acknowledge that the \nimpact of this corridor on the town's traditional traffic flow is now irreversible. At this stage, \nour focus must be on the strategic implementation of palliative measures designed to mitigate \nthese disruptions and restore fluidity to the region.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the public will vividly recall the intense debate that surfaced \nduring the construction of the light rail system in Quatre Bornes. There was a profound sense \nof apprehension among residents and business operators alike, who feared that an at-ground \nlevel configuration would fundamentally disrupt their daily lives. These concerns were not \nunfounded.  \nIndeed, myself as an elected Member of Opposition, on 24 September 2019, I stood up \nin this very House and addressed three consecutive Parliamentary Questions to the then \nMinister, Mr Nando Bodha. My first Parliamentary Question on that day, PQ B/886, \nspecifically challenged the positioning of the track along Saint Jean Road. I had, with \nunfortunate accuracy, foreseen the traffic segregation and the adverse socio-economic impacts \nwe are forced to navigate. The warnings were clear then, but they were ignored.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I must underline that Quatre Bornes was historically the most \nmodern of our towns, bearing the hallmark of superior urban planning and a pleasant living \nenvironment. Was the construction of the light rail line a result of total lack of foresight \nregarding traffic repercussions or was it an inconsiderate attempt to demonstrate for political \nmileage that the project could be completed at lower cost?  \nMost of the railway runs from Curepipe to Port Louis, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, on ex-\nrailway tracks. One would, therefore, think that the more logical alignment for the light rail in \nthe region of Quatre Bornes was to follow the old railway line, stretching from Avenue Sodnac \nto the market fair, to connect to Promenade Roland Armand. However, because that region is \na densely built-up area, an alternative alignment, running partially parallel to the M1 at Trianon \nand cutting into Saint Jean, was chosen.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the TMRSU of my Ministry that despite \nmicro-level traffic analysis undertaken at various junctions to optimise operational \nperformance, severe traffic congestion and delays persist along key sections of Saint Jean and \nadjoining streets. \nSeveral recurrent  traffic congestion locations have been identified within the town of \nQuatre-Bornes, particularly during hours, notably along Saint-Jean Road, from La Louise to \nTrianon, Hillcrest Road towards Motorway M1, and the transit signal priority system junction \nof Victoria Avenue and Sir Guy Forget and Belle Rose Avenue, and also Remy Olier Avenue \nand Pasteur Avenue and Ythier Avenue, as well as the town centre of Quatre-Bornes, including \nthe market area and surrounding school zones, where high pedestrian and vehicular traffic are \nobserved.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we are maximising the utility of existing infrastructure for \npublic safety. In the event of a major accident, the light rail track at Saint Jean has been \ndesigned to serve as an emergency corridor for first responders. This was put to test in the \nevening of 10 December 2025, five months ago, when Metro Express Limited successfully \nconducted its first ever emergency situation at the request of the hon. elected members of \nConstituency number 18. Hon. Ms. Anquetil, hon. Dr. Boolell and yourself, Mr Deputy \nSpeaker, Sir. \nNo. 18, so sorry about that. I purposely made that mistake so that I know whether you \nare following or not. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in relation to the request to elaborate a master plan, I am \ninformed that the Road Development Authority, in its capacity as the highway authority, has \nworked on a draft Strategic Road Master Plan, which is being discussed at different levels, and \nis pursuing a series of infrastructure interventions aimed at improving traffic flow and regional \nconnectivity within and around Quatre-Bornes. Accordingly, the Saint-Jean A1 constitutes the \nprincipal arterial corridor within Quatre-Bornes, accommodating significant traffic for regional \nconnectivity. The RDA has also implemented the construction of the Hillcrest interchange \ntogether with the duelling of Hillcrest Road, which has upgraded the existing road \ninfrastructure, increased network capacity, enhanced connectivity, and provided alternative \nroutes for road users.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to further highlight that these measures taken by the RDA \nto address the following traffic burden are as follows in bullet points – \n1. \nUpgrading the Ebene flyover; \n2. \nA slip lane which streamlines the transition towards the M3, successfully diverting \na significant volume of traffic that previously saturated the Saint-Jean interchange; \n3. \nPellegrin-Trianon Link Road, currently at the implementation stage to enhance \nregional connectivity; \n4. \nStrategic pipeline projects, and here I have in mind a new link road connecting the \nM1 at Hillcrest to the M3 at Trianon, and decongestion strategy in terms of \ninfrastructural bypasses specifically engineered to draw traffic away from Quatre-\nBornes town centre. \n I can assure the hon. Member that the TRMSU will continue following up with the \nTRMSU and will intervene as and when required.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we must acknowledge that any improvement to the two-lane \nsection of Saint-Jean Road will be marginal unless we reduce overall traffic volume.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay.  \nMr Osman Mahomed: To this end, I am pleased to announce that the park and ride with \nat Quatre-Bornes, which can accommodate 45 cars, is almost ready. This facility will be \ncommissioned very shortly, potentially by the end of June, providing a secure space for \ncommuters to leave their cars and board the trams. By encouraging this modal shift and \nimplementing the proposed engineering solutions, we aim to restore at least some of the \nmobility that the people of Quatre-Bornes so rightly deserve.  \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes.  \nMs Anquetil : Je vous remercie M. le président. Je remercie le ministre pour sa réponse. \nLe ministre peut-il expliquer à la Chambre pourquoi les rails du Métro Express ont été \nimplantés en plein centre de Quatre Bornes, provoquant une congestion chronique et pénalisant \nlourdement la circulation des habitants de Quatre Bornes, alors que des aménagements moins \ncontraignants ont été retenus à Curepipe, à Vacoas et à Port-Louis ? Merci. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Well, I do believe for two reasons, they did not follow the \noriginal alignment of the ex-railway track because the region is already heavily built up. There \nwould have been huge impact on demolition cost. This is what I think. And also, they could \nhave gone for a better solution but then like I explained in my substantive reply, I think they \nhad to cut cost in order to be politically correct. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Last one. \nMs Anquetil: Last one. J’ai beaucoup, mais bon. \nM. le président, alors que le métro est censé contribuer à la décongestion routière, le \nministre peut-il indiquer à la Chambre quelles sont les solutions immédiates qui sont prévues \npour les automobilistes alors qu'une série de carrefours sur la route principale de Saint-Jean \nimpose des détours lourds et excessifs aux habitants, une véritable punition imposée par nul \nautre que l'ancien gouvernement MSM avec la complicité de l'ex PPS et de l'ancien ministre \nau numéro 18 ? Merci. \nMr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have listed a series of mitigating \nmeasures that the RDA, together with my ministry, are envisaging but then the modal shift, \nthat I explained earlier, people favouring leaving their cars at the park and ride and using the \ntrams, would greatly facilitate, especially at peak hours. So, I rely on the hon. member to \ncanvass. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Honourable First Member for Piton Rivière du Rempart. \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 7 – FOOTBALL GROUNDS & MINI SOCCER \nPITCHES – LIGHTING INFRASTRUCTURE – MAINTENANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/582",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 582,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/582) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked the \nMinister of Local Government whether, in regard to the football grounds and mini soccer \npitches within Constituency No. 7, Piton and Rivière du Rempart, he will, for the benefit of the \nHouse, obtain information as to whether the state of the lighting infrastructure thereat have \nbeen assessed and, if so, indicate whether consideration will be given for the repair and \nupgrading thereof and the expected timeframe within which same will be executed.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Constituency No. 7, Piton and Rivière du \nRempart falls under the District Council of Rivière du Rempart and the District Council of \nPamplemousses.  \nA full assessment of the lighting at all football grounds and mini soccer pitches has \nalready been completed. In total, there are 12 football grounds and seven mini soccer pitches. \nNine of the football grounds are already in good condition with lighting system fully \noperational. In some cases, new flood lights have already been installed such as four at Beau \nClimat in Amaury and 16 at Point de Lascar and these are now fully functional.  \nHowever, three football grounds required major upgrading of the lighting system, namely \nBeau Plato at Cottage, L'Espérance Piton near NHDC and Rohit Boolaky Stadium in Rivière \ndu Rempart. These are not minor repairs but need full reinstatement works. The scope has \nalready been defined, cost estimate has been worked out and the projects have been prioritised. \nGiven that current budgetary allocation is already committed to ongoing and priority works; \nthis project will be taken up in the next financial year subject to availability of fund.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as we go to mini soccer pitch, five are already in good condition \nand are fully operational. These include the SILWF pitch at Amaury, inaugurated on 25 April \n2026, as well as Gandhi Square, Morcellement NHDC and Village Hall Yard at Poudre d’Or. \nAt La Clemence, only minor maintenance works are required and are currently being attended \nto. At Pierrefond, Plaine des Papayes, the installation of flood lights and electrical components \nhas already been completed and the remaining step is the final connection by the Central \nElectricity Board, which is expected to be completed by this month.  \nFollowing the site visit carried out on 21 January 2026 at Plaine des Papayes, additional \nupgrading works were proposed for the mini soccer pitch and open gym at an estimated cost \nof Rs1.5 million and priority components, namely flood lights and electrical works amounting \nto Rs80,000 have already been approved and implemented.  \nThe remaining items including synthetic grass, conditioning and related works are \ncurrently under review to ensure that costs are reasonable before any further commitment of \npublic funds. At Ville Bague, both the Village Hall, Futsal pitch and Petite Julie football ground \nare operational. Further upgrading works including relocation of poles and installation of 600-\nWatts flood lights are already scheduled along site ongoing development works with \ncompletion expected by July 2026.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, all sites have been properly assessed and categorised. \nUrgent and minor works are being addressed, while major projects are being \nimplemented in a phased manner in line with budgetary priorities. This approach ensures that \npublic funds are used responsibly while delivering safe, durable and modern sports facilities.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am tabling the full list of all football grounds and mini soccer \npitch together with their respective status and planned intervention. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes! \nDr. Prayag: Thank you, hon. Minister for your reply. Meanwhile, awaiting the \nreparation of these lights, can we consider to install street lights lanterns, like we have on the \nstreet, in these in these three places where people going to do jogging early mornings when it's \nstill dark, and they can have light facilities in the meantime? Thank you. \nMr Woochit: Yes, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I will take note of the request for the lighting \nfacilities. I will request the District Council to take necessary actions upon availability of the \nstreet lights. \nThe Deputy Speaker:  The hon. First Member for Savanne and Black River! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 14 – MORCELLEMENT BLACK ROCK & BELOGUET \n– DRAINS CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/583",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 583,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/583) Mr B. Babajee (First Member for Savanne & Black River) asked the \nMinister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the flood-prone areas in Constituency \nNo. 14, Savanne and Black River, particularly, in the regions of Morcellement Black Rock and \nBeloguet, in Tamarin, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Road Development \nAuthority, information as to – \n(a) \nwhere matters stand regarding the proposed construction of new drains thereat, and \n(b) \nwhether a survey will be carried out to assess the condition of the existing drains, \nindicating the measures being envisaged to mitigate flooding risks thereat.",
      "answer": "Mr Gunness: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, at the very outset, I wish to point out the \nfollowing. First, based on available data, the two places referred to in the question, namely \nMorcellement Black Rock and Morcellement Beloguet, do not fall in flood prone areas and are \nneither found in no-go zones nor in no-expansion zone.  \nSecond, Morcellement Black Rock and Morcellement Beloguet are not located along the \nclassified road, Black River Road A3, and, therefore, do not fall under the jurisdiction of the \nRoad Development Authority, which is responsible for the care and maintenance of classified \nroads, specifically main roads and motorways, including the maintenance, upgrading and \nconstruction of new drains along those roads.  \nThird, Morcellement Beloguet is a private property, as informed by the District Council \nof Black River.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the \nLand Drainage Authority that there are no ongoing projects being implemented by the RDA in \nthe region.  \nHowever, the RDA has, based on the recommendation of the LDA, planned to undertake \nthe reconstruction of the following two culverts at La Gaulette – \n(i) \nculvert near La Gaulette Community Centre. A works order to the tune of \nRs11,221,360.89, inclusive of VAT, has been issued on 08 April 2026.  \n(ii) \nculvert at La Gaulette near the state secondary school, funds have been requested \nfor implementation of the project in financial year 2026/2027.  \nI am also informed by the Black River District Council that it has one drain project in the \nregion of Black Rock, Tamarin near Oxenham with regard to the construction of two cut-off \ndrains. This project is still at design stage.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (b) of the question, I am informed by the Black \nRiver District Council that the services of a consultant will be sought to conduct a survey and \nassess the existing drains in the whole area in a holistic manner to propose flood mitigating \nmeasures prior to seeking approval of the LDA and financial clearance for implementing the \nproject.  \nI am further informed by the LDA and the and the Black River District Council that the \nlatter carries out regular cleaning and desilting of drains to ensure free flow of water. The \ncleaning and desilting of the natural drain at Morcellement Black Rock, Tamarin was \nundertaken last year. Regular cleaning is done as and when required. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay.  \nThe hon. Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue! \nPUBLIC SERVICE – PAPERLESS ENVIRONMENT – IMPLEMENTATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/584",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 584,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port-Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms",
      "question": "(No. B/584) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port-Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Public Service and Administrative Reforms whether, in regard \nto the promotion of a paperless environment within the public service, he will state the \nmeasures being taken to reduce reliance on hard copies of documents.",
      "answer": "Mr Pentiah: First and foremost, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I thank the hon. Member for \nhis question. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the transition towards a paperless public service \nconstitutes a central pillar of this Government's broader digital transformation initiatives aimed \nat agenda.  \nMy Ministry has been spearheading a range of strategic initiatives aimed at reducing \nreliance on paper-based processes, enhancing operational efficiency, and improving the overall \nresponsiveness of service delivery across Ministries and departments.  \nThis transition is being pursued through the progressive digitalisation of administrative \nprocesses, the development of integrated information systems, and the re-engineering of \nworkflows with a view of embedding more agile, efficient, and sustainable practices across the \npublic service.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House of key initiatives which have been \nimplemented by my Ministry or which are currently underway. The electronic Human \nResource System is fully operational. It serves as a centralised digital repository for the \npersonnel and employment records of over 57,000 public officers, and enables officers to apply \nfor various types of leave online. The system also comprises an e-movement module, which \nallows officers to record their official movements electronically.  \nMy Ministry has also implemented the electronic attendance system. This has eliminated \nthe need for attendance registers through the use of electronic time recorders, recorders, and a \ncentralised attendance management platform.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, a major milestone in the digital transformation journey is the \nimplementation of the Electronic Document Management System, (EDMS), introduced with \nthe support of the United Nations Development Programme and funded from the Government \nof Japan, the system is operational.  \nIt enables the full lifecycle management of documents in electronic form, from creation \nand processing to storage, retrieval, and archiving. The project shall be scaled up at the level \nof my Ministry and also rolled out across the public service.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, furthermore, my Ministry has initiated the development of an \nelectronic scheme of service system, which will transform what has traditionally been a manual \nand paper intensive process into a fully digital workflow.  \nFollowing a successful pilot phase, the contract for the implementation of the system was \nawarded in November 2025. Once operational, it will enable electronic drafting, consultation, \napproval, and storage of schemes of service while facilitating real-time collaboration among \nkey stakeholders. \n In parallel, my Ministry is currently undertaking the review and digitalisation of the \nPerformance Management System in line with the recommendations of the 2026 Pay Research \nBureau Report.  \nThis reform will transition performance appraisal processes to an integrated digital \nplatform, enable real-time monitoring, online submission of reports, and data driven decision-\nmaking.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, these initiatives are being complemented by the Public Service \nReform Scheme, which provides a structured framework to modernise administrative processes \nand promote a more efficient, responsive, and citizen-centric public service.  \nA key component of the scheme is business process re-engineering, which focuses on \nredesigning workflows through the use of digital technologies to eliminate redundancies and \nreduce duplication.  \nIn addition, capacity-building programmes are being implemented to equip public \nofficers with the necessary digital competencies to operate effectively. I wish to inform the \nHouse, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that we have worked closely with the hon. Minister of \nInformation Technology, Communication and Innovation to bring in elements in our syllabuses \nfor training and capacity building so that our public officers are well equipped. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, dedicated support is being provided under the scheme of the \nreforms and innovation units as well, which was under the budget of 2025-2026, established \nacross Ministries and Departments. These units serve as key drivers of change at the operational \nlevel and are responsible for identifying, developing and implementing reform initiatives, \nparticularly those aimed at reducing reliance on paper-based processes and accelerating the \nadoption of digital solutions. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am also informed by the Ministry of Environment, Solid \nWaste Management and Climate Change that under the greening of the public sector initiative \nand pursuant to the Digital Transformation Blueprint 2025-2029, several ICT initiatives are \nbeing undertaken by public organisations and institutions to achieve the ecological transition \nof Mauritius to a cleaner and greener Mauritius. \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, these measures are being implemented in a phased and \ncoordinated manner and are already contributing to a tangible reduction in the use of hard copy \ndocuments across the public service. \n Thank you. \n  \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Savanne and Black River. \nHOG PLUM BEETLE INVASION – COMPLAINTS – ASSISTANCE TO \nPLANTERS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/585",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 585,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/585) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard \nto the invasion of the Hog Plum Beetle, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information \nas to the number of complaints received in respect thereof, indicating – \n(a) \nthe actions being taken or envisaged to counter same, and \n(b) \nwhether a plan is in place to assist planters affected by same.",
      "answer": "Dr. Boolell: I thank the hon. Member for putting the question. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, \nwith regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed that the Hog Plum Beetle was first \ndetected in March 2025 in the region of Moka and since then, has spread to several other \nregions across the island.  \nIt should be noted that the pest has been found to feed only on the leaves of fruit de \nCythère leading to significant defoliation of affected trees. It is suspected that the Hog Plum \nBeetle has entered the country through illegal importation of infested fruit de Cythère plant. \nI am further informed by the Entomology Division of the Ministry, and Food and \nAgricultural Research Extension Institute that as at 30 April 2026, a total of 765 complaints \nhas been registered in relation to the invasion of the Hog Plum Beetle, out of which 18 cases \nof mainly grown-up trees have been attended and treated with neem-based insecticide, which \nis considered to be safe. For the remaining complaints, advice was tendered by officers of \nFAREI and during site visits to growers by my Ministry since its detection. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, furthermore, approximately 8 media interventions, including \ntelevision and radio programme, as well as the publication of articles in the local press have \nbeen carried out to inform the public about the pest and recommended control measures, which \ninclude the application of insecticides such as neem-based products. \n With regard to part (b) of the question, actions have been initiated with the help of \nForeign Institutions, including the Centre de coopération Internationale en recherche \nagronomique pour le développement (CIRAD) and the Centre for Agricultural and Bioscience \nInternational, otherwise known as CABI. CABI, which has responded positively, is working \nclosely with officers of the Ministry to identify and introduce potential biological control for \nthe management of the Hog Plum Beetle. \n Once, the most promising agent is identified, further studies will be conducted to \ndetermine its host range prior to any introduction in Mauritius. Now, this process is expected \nto be completed before the end of this year. I have also been informed that this pest has recently \nbeen detected in Philippines and an Integrated Pest Management Programme, including use of \npredators and application of biopesticides have been used. \n My Ministry is working in close collaboration with Customs authorities at border entry \npoints to reinforce and enhance control measures to effectively prevent the illegal introduction \nof such pests into the country. \nMr Deputy Speaker:  The hon. Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & Souillac!  \n \nBASIC INVALIDITY PENSION – APPLICATIONS (NOV 2024-APRIL2026) – \nREJECTIONS & APPEALS – PROCESS EFFICACY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/586",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 586,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/586) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac)  asked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \nwhether, in regard to applications for the Basic Invalidity Pension received since November \n2024 to date, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Medical Board, information \nas to the number thereof rejected, indicating the reasons therefor and the number thereof \nallowed on appeal, further indicating the average time taken for the determination of an appeal \nand measures being envisaged to enhance the efficiency and fairness of the determination \nprocess.",
      "answer": "Mr Subron: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that since November 2024 to date, \nmy Ministry through the Medical Board has examined 27,308 cases of invalid's basic pension \napplications, out of which 17,181 have been allowed, which represents 63% allowed out of the \ntotal examined cases. And 10,127 have been disallowed, which represents 37% disallowed out \nof the total examined cases. \n The reasons for applications being rejected by the Medical Board are that they do not \nmeet the criteria set out in the present medical guidelines and those vary from case to case.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to Medical Appeal Tribunal, which also falls under \nthe Medical Unit of my Ministry, at present, a person whose case has been disallowed by the \nMedical Board has the right to make an appeal to the Medical Appeal Tribunal.  \nThe Medical Appeal Tribunal is chaired by a representative of the Attorney General's \nOffice and comprises two members, namely two specialists in relevant fields. I am informed \nthat since November 2024 to March 2026, 7,631 cases have been assessed by the Medical \nAppeal Tribunal, out of which 2,923 were allowed, which represents 38.3% cases which are \nexamined by the Medical Appeal Tribunal. \n I also wish to add that previously, waiting time to determine an appeal was \napproximately three to five months. Currently, I am informed that waiting time from the \nmoment of application to appearing before the Medical Appeal Tribunal is around one to two \nmonths. \n Though lots remain to be done, I must say that there has been a slight improvement \nduring the period queried by the hon. Member. The reform on disability pension will further \nimprove and remedy the waiting time, thus reducing the burden of our citizens. \n Let me once more inform the House that this Government is not insensitive to the \ncomplaints of applicants of invalid basic pension. As part of the reform of disability pension, \nmy Ministry has drafted an update medical guideline as part as part one of phase one of the \nreform in consultation with medical practitioners and specialists serving the Medical Board \nand Medical Appeal Tribunal, which has been sent to the Ministry of Health and Wellness for \nvalidation. \n The phase one of the reform through the updated medical guidelines will introduce \nfunctional criteria for a more fair and efficient determination of disability limitations of the \ndifferent pathologies, as well as introduce new inclusive living allowances for those having a \ndisability estimated in between 40% to 59%. \n I am happy to announce in this Assembly that the Ministry of Health has just provided \nits views and comments regarding the new medical guidelines and same is being looked at the \nlevel of my Ministry. I wish to thank the hon. Minister and the Ministry of Health for their \nrigorous work. After the finalisation of the new medical guidelines, we will go to the Ministry \nof Finance for financial clearance and change the law for implementation. \nI can reassure the hon. Member that measures taken up to now and measures being \nenvisaged in the near future will enhance the efficiency and fairness of the determination \nprocess, thus at the same time, putting human dignity and care at the centre of my Ministry's \nservice. Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Dr. Ms Daureeawo?  \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: Could the hon. Minister specify the main medical conditions or \ncategories leading to rejection? \nMr Subron: I do not have the specific information but the criteria are determined by the \nmedical guidelines and the regulations in the National Pensions Act, that is, the degree of \ndisability needs to be 60% or up. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Do you have another one? Yes? \nDr. Ms Daureeawo: And could the hon. Minister state whether the composition of the \nMedical Board is considered adequate in terms of specialist diversity? \nMr Subron: The Medical Board is composed of the doctors employed by the Ministry \nof Social Security, whereas at the Medical Appeal Tribunal, there are two specialists. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Grand Baie and Poudre d'Or! \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 6 – PIPE LAYING WORKS & REPAIRS – ROAD \nREINSTATEMENTS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/587",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 587,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/587) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the pipe laying works and \nrepairs undertaken in Constituency No. 6, Grand Baie and Poudre d'Or, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, the list of the roads concerned therewith \nnot reinstated as at to date, indicating the – \n(a) \nreasons therefor, and  \n(b) \nexpected re-instatement dates thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Assirvaden: M. le président, la CWA m’informe que les travaux de remplacement \nde tuyaux ont été entrepris dans la circonscription numéro 6, à Grand Baie et à Poudre d'Or \npour un total de 21,2 km à partir de 2023. Des projets de production ont été réalisés dans le \ncadre des programmes de petites et moyennes entreprises (PME) et des grands contrats dans \ndes régions telles que Fond du Sac, Grand Gaube, Petit Raffray, Goodlands, Lower Vale, \nPoudre d'Or et Grand Baie. Pour les contrats majeurs, les travaux de remise en état ont été \nachevés à Fond du Sac, Grand Gaube et Roche Terre. En ce qui concerne les contrats pour les \nPME, M. le président, tous les travaux de remise en état ont été achevés en février 2026, cette \nannée-ci, dans le cadre d'un contrat distinct attribué à Beemanique Stone Crusher Ltd en octobre \n2025. Pour la mise en place des nouvelles conduites d'alimentation et la réparation des fuites, \nles entrepreneurs sont tenus de terminer la remise en état de la route dans un délai – les \nnouveaux contrats – de trois jours.  \nCependant, M. le président, dans certaines régions, il est vrai de le dire, la remise en \nservice n'a pas encore pu être effectuée en raison des facteurs tel que les conditions \nmétéorologiques défavorables ou la nécessité d'interventions techniques supplémentaires. \nDonc, pour les tuyaux qu'on a fini de mettre, il faudra les éprouver, il y aura des épreuves à \nfaire pour vérifier s’il n’y a pas de fuites. Donc, on parle ici de la région de Goodlands, de \nRoche Terre, de Grand Gaube, de Sottise, de Pereybere et de Fond du Sac. Ces travaux de \nremise en état des routes en attente concernent des surfaces de 11 à 36 m² dans différents \nvillages et devraient être achevés d'ici fin mai 2026. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Beejan? \nMr Beejan:  Thank you, Deputy Speaker, Sir. Will the hon. Minister inform the House \nwhat accountability mechanisms are in place to ensure that contractors under CWA adhere to \ndeadlines? \nMr Assirvaden: Je dois dire qu’effectivement, dans le temps, vous savez, le Pipe \nReplacement Programme de 700 million de roupies par l'ancienne direction et c'est vrai que les \ncontracteurs, il y avait beaucoup de connivence, il faut bien le dire. Et à un moment donné, ils \nont même licencié la responsable de l'audit et fermé l'audit.  \n(Interruptions) \nPour vous dire, la dame, oui, on avait posé une question, je me rappelle, l'honorable Dr. Boolell \nétait leader de l'Opposition. La dame était Madame Joomka et elle a dû partir parce qu'on a \nfermé l'audit.  \nDonc, pour vous dire, M. le président, c'est que nous avons revu complètement le \nnouveau programme de Pipe Replacement Programme, déjà nous avons un accord avec le \ngouvernement indien pour R 1.2 milliard pour changer les tuyaux, le Pipe Replacement \nProgramme dans 14 régions qui va commencer dès que nous avons l'accord du gouvernement \nindien. Nous avons revu le mécanisme et en ce qui concerne l'accountability, je dois dire que \ndorénavant, les ingénieurs, les officiers de la CWA, ceux qui préparent les tenders ne seront \nplus autorisés à signer pour l'autorisation pour le paiement ; une chose.  \nDeuxième chose, c'est qu’ils ne seront plus autorisés à avoir du subcontracting. Cela a \nété fait dans le passé. Vous savez, ils ont split des contrats de 700 millions de roupies en des \npetits contrats pour pouvoir être alloués. Donc, le subcontracting ce sera effectivement, et en \nce qui concerne the payment, les paiements, dorénavant, le dernier authorisation sera au niveau \nde mon ministère pour le paiement. Vous savez, dans le temps, la direction de la CWA ne \nrépondait même pas au ministère, ne répondait même pas à l'ancien ministre. Donc, pour vous \ndire, il répondait directement si vous voulez à la cuisine, oui, mais pas au ministère. Et \nquatrièmement, ceux qui préparent les tenders au sein de la CWA ne seront plus autorisés à \nsigner les paiements. Donc, il y a eu cette connivence dans le temps. Et pour dire aussi que \nnous avons revu complètement le mécanisme au niveau de la CWA, au niveau de l'audit de la \nCWA et aussi au niveau du ministère. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Beejan? \nMr Beejan: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. May I ask the hon. Minister whether \npenalties on contractors are applied or will be applied in cases of unjustified delays? Because \nthere has been such a situation where works have not yet been completed for more than three \nmonths at Shivaji Lane, Grand Baie. Can you please inform the House? Thank you. \nMr Assirvaden: Et je vais certainement voir la région que l'honorable membre cite ici à \nl'Assemblée. Mais c'est sûr que les pénalités doivent être appliquées as per the contract. Mais \nvous savez, quand nous avons pris les dossiers au sein de la CWA, la plupart des contracteurs \nqui étaient là déjà ont dû répondre à la Financial Crimes Commission. Et la Financial Crimes \nCommission nous ont dit qu’ils ont des enquêtes, d'arrêter de payer et les enquêtes sont en \ncours. A ce moment-là, on s'est retrouvé avec des travaux, avec quelques endroits où ils ont \nfouillé, il n’y avait pas de tuyaux. Certains endroits, ils ont mis des tuyaux qui n'étaient pas \nconnectés. D'autres endroits, ils ont mis des tuyaux qui ont été connectés mais ils n'ont pas \nrefait l'asphalte.  \nDonc, on s'est retrouvé un peu partout à l'île Maurice, dans des endroits, chez mon ami \nl'honorable Bhagwan à Coromandel, donc, on s'est retrouvé avec des dizaines de contracteurs \nqui ont encaissé des millions et des millions de roupies dans le temps, mais qui n'ont pas \nterminé le travail. Nous avons eu pas mal de problèmes avec le ministère des Infrastructures \nen ce qui concerne les chemins qui ne sont pas asphaltés. Donc, nous avons dû, à ce moment-\nlà, attendre que la Financial Crimes Commission termine les enquêtes pour pouvoir continuer \nà payer les contracteurs pour qu'ils puissent continuer à faire le travail. Deuxième chose, nous \navons aussi dû demander au ministère des Finances des fonds supplémentaires, parce que les \n700 millions de roupies étaient complètement évaporés et le travail n'a pas été fait. Je reçois \nchaque semaine pas mal de complaintes de mes collègues ici, mais on se retrouve impuissant, \nune chose de par la Financial Crimes Commission et deuxièmement au niveau des fonds au \nministère des Finances.  \nDonc, pour remettre à neuf les chemins, il faudra peut-être demander autour – j'ai fait un \ncalcul au sein de la CWA – demander peut-être 300 millions, 350 millions au ministère des \nFinances pour pouvoir remettre à neuf alors que dans le contrat initial, c'était prévu dans les \n700 millions la pose des tuyaux, fouiller, et asphaltage. Alors que vous avez remarqué, les \ntuyaux sont posés un peu partout sur le chemin allant à Rivière Noire, à Flic-en-Flac ou à Mont \nChoisy.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay, I think you have answered the question. \nMr Assirvaden: Mais dans le projet, c'était…Vous voyez donc, M. le président et ça me \npassionne.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: You have answered the question. Thank you. \n(Interruptions) \nMs Anquetil: Il est passionné ! On voit qu’il est passionné ! \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle. \nNEWBORN K. S. – JAWAHARLAL NEHRU HOSPITAL – NEONATAL INTENSIVE \nCARE UNIT – HYGIENE RELATED ISSUE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/588",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 588,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/588) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to newborn K. S. admitted at the \nJawaharlal Nehru Hospital in or about the month of February or April 2026, he will state \nwhether consideration will be given for the conduct of an inquiry into an alleged incident \nconcerning hygiene in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit on 12 March 2026 and the dispensing \nof expired medication thereto upon discharge on 14 April 2026 and the taking of the taking of \nappropriate measures in the light of the outcome thereof.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to inform the House that newborn baby K.S. \nwas admitted in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) on 16 February 2026 following an \nemergency Caesarean section at Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital. The baby was subsequently \ntransferred to Special Care Baby Unit, site 2 on 27 February 2026. \nI am informed that on 18 March 2026, the baby was transferred from Special Care Baby \nUnit 2 to Special Care Baby Unit 1, Ward 1.5 Nursery. On 14 April 2026, the baby, being \nstabilised, was able to feed normally and was discharged by the paediatrician.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am further informed that an official complaint was received \nby the Regional Health Director of the Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital on 12 March 2026. \nAccording to the complainant, that is, the father of the newborn K.S., few ants were noticed on \nthe side of the incubator and one ant was crawling directly on the newborn baby. Following \nthe complaint dated 12 March 2026, an internal inquiry was carried out and the nursing staff \ninformed that the incubator is daily cleansed and, at no moment, ants were found in any \nincubator.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, on 18 April 2026, another complaint was received from the \nfather of the newborn K.S. regarding the previous observation of ants in NICU as well as \nexpired medication provided to the newborn baby. According to the complainant, at the time \nof discharge, that is, on 14 April 2026, a colic drop was provided by the hospital staff with \nexpiry date 11 April 2026. The complainant, therefore, requested that a full and independent \ninvestigation be carried out in the matter.  \nAt the time of discharge, the patient was already in possession of the colicaid drop, used \nearlier in the NICU, and as such, a new one was not dispensed. An investigation is being carried \nout as to why the expired colicaid drop was not returned by the staff, and the same drug \nprescribed, expiring in July 2026, was not handed over by the relatives.  \nFollowing receipt of the complaint, the matter was referred to the Infection Prevention \nand Control Coordinator. On 30 April 2026, the IPC Coordinator contacted the IPC Registered \nMedical Officer as well as the Acting Ward Manager of NICU at Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital. \nAccording to the NICU staff, no ant or insect were observed in the incubators. \nAs regards the complaint pertaining to the expired colic drops, I am informed that the \nneonatal ICU had intended colic drops on 15 of March 2026 for baby K.S. for a treatment \nduration of one week, and that one flask of colic drops was accordingly dispensed to the ward. \nThe expiry date of this batch was 11 April 2026. Subsequently, a new batch of colic drops, \nwith an expiry date of 07 July 2026, was used in the SCBU (Special Care Baby Unit).  \nI am informed that no issue was raised at the level of NICU at the Jawaharlal Nehru \nHospital in relation to hygiene conditions within the unit during the period under reference. It \nis also to be noted that strict observance of infection prevention and control protocols is \npermanently enforced in the NICU Department. In addition, no case of multi-drug-resistant \norganisms were reported during the months of February, March and April 2026. The NICU \nperformance score under the MoBienet Application stands at 88%, which is a good score.  \nI am further informed that a system of regular monitoring of expiry dates is in place \nwithin the pharmacy to ensure that no expired medication is dispensed to patients. As an \nadditional measure to further strengthen oversight, instructions have been issued for \npharmacists to carry out regular inspections of hospital wards to verify the absence of expired \nmedication. It is however to be emphasised that the primary responsibility for ensuring that no \nexpired drugs are kept in the ward stock rests with the Charge Nurse or Ward Manager.  \nMy Ministry will ensure that the established clinical and pharmaceutical protocols are \nduly observed in the management of this case, both in respect of infection prevention and \ncontrol as well as medication dispensing, and will continue to reinforce monitoring mechanism \nto ensure sustained compliance with best practice standards. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Ramdass! \nMr Ramdass: Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. Of course, I welcome the \ninvestigation announced by the hon. Minister.  \nAs the hon. Minister has stated himself, in fact, there were two incidents further to which \nan official complaint was addressed to the Regional Health Director by the responsible party, \nwho also tried to meet him. Is the hon. Minister aware that up to this day, not a single response, \nnot a single reply, has been addressed to the responsible party of this newborn baby by the \nhospital staff or at least the Regional Health Director? \nMr Bachoo: Well, I was informed about the attitude of the Director, and I have also \nreceived complaints. I can assure the hon. Member that I am looking into this case seriously. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Second Member for Savanne and Black River! \nOVERSEAS MEDICAL TREATMENT SERVICE – ASSOCIATIONS/PRIVATE \nENTITIES – COMPLAINTS/IRREGULARITIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/589",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 589,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Ramkalawon)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/589) Mr C. Ramkalawon (Third Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to overseas medical treatment of Mauritian \npatients being organised by associations and private entities, he will state whether he has taken \ncognizance of concerns expressed and alleged complaints or irregularities regarding the \nfunctioning, governance and service delivery thereof and, if so, having regard to the substantial \npublic and private funds involved therein, indicate whether his Ministry proposes to take any \naction in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/579) \nBLUP ISSUANCE – REVISED APPLICATIONS, CLEARANCES & PROCEDURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/590",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 590,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/590) Mr S. Jugurnauth (Second Member for Savanne & Black River) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the application for the issue of a \nBuilding and Land Use Permit, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nwhether, subsequent to an applicant obtaining clearances from all relevant authorities, \nincluding the Road Development Authority, the Land Drainage Authority and the Environment \nauthorities, the latter may be required by any such local authority to effect additional \namendments thereto and, if so, indicate whether consideration will be given for the limiting of \nsuch amendments to a single instance aiming at enhancing efficiency and legal certainty of the \nprocess.",
      "answer": "Mr Woochit: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, at the outset, let me make it clear that application \nfor Building and Land Use Permits, commonly known as BLUPs, are processed under the \nLocal Government Act 2011 through the NELS, that is, the National e-Licensing System. \nUnder the present system, certain clearances from public utilities, namely the CEB, CWA, and \nWMA are already integrated in NELS and are subject to prescribed timeframes. Where an \napplication is complete and only such clearances are required, the matter may be determined \nwithin the statutory period.  \nHowever, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, many BLUPs applications are not so straightforward. \nDepending on the nature, scale, and location of the proposed development, the local authority \nmay have to seek the views or clearances of other competent authorities such as the Road \nDevelopment Authority, the Land Drainage Authority, the Traffic Management and Road \nSafety Unit, and the Forestry Service, the Ministry of Environment, Solid Waste Management \nand Climate Change, the Ministry of Health, or the Ministry of Agro-Industry, among others. \nThese clearances are not mere formalities. They are required to ensure that the proposed \ndevelopment complies with road safety, drainage, flood mitigation, environmental health, \ninfrastructure, and planning requirements before a permit is issued.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the difficulty is that several of these authorities are not yet fully \nintegrated into the NELS platform. In many cases, they operate under their own procedures, \ntechnical standards, and timelines. In practice, their views may be received at different stages. \nWhen those views contain conditions or required changes, the applicant must then be informed \nand requested to submit revised plans, additional documents, technical reports, or other \nparticular. Therefore, to the first part of the question, the answer is yes.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, even after an applicant has obtained certain initial clearances, \nadditional amendments may still be required by the local authority where such amendments \nare necessary to ensure full compliance with the requirements imposed by the competent \nauthority and with the law. This is not done to create unnecessary obstacle. It is done to avoid \nunsafe, non-compliant or legally defective approvals.  \nFor example, the RDA or the Traffic Management Road Safety Unit may require changes \nrelating to access, visibility, or traffic flow. The LDA may require flood mitigation measures \nor upgrading of existing drainage systems. The environment authorities may impose conditions \nto protect sensitive areas. The council must ensure that these requirements are properly \nreflected to the final approved plans before issuing any permits.  \nWith regard to the second part of the question, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I fully understand \nthe concern about delays and repeated amendments. It is true that applicants need a system \nwhich is faster, clearer, and even more predictable. However, limiting amendments to one \nsingle instance in all cases would not always be practical or safe. Technical issues may appear \nonly after revised plan are examined or after another authority has submitted its views. A rigid \ntime of amendment rule could result either in premature rejection of the application, or worse, \nin the approval of projects which do not properly meet safety, drainage, or environmental or \nplanning standards.  \nThat said, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, Government is fully conscious that the present system \nmust be improved. My Ministry is, therefore, examining measures to make the BLUP process \nmore efficient and more transparent. These include – \n\nthe integration of all major clearance authorities into NELS;  \n\nThe introduction of clearer statutory response timelines for relevant authorities; \n\nbetter inter-agency coordination;  \n\nreal-time tracking of referral and responses, and  \n \nwhere possible, the issuing of one consolidated list of amendment to applicants to \nreduce unnecessary back and forth.  \nSuch reforms may require administrative changes, service level arrangement between \nauthorities, and due consideration is therefore being given by my Ministry to prescribe all other \nrelevant authorities, whose views and clearances are required, but who are not presently \nregistered on the NELS.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, our objective is clear. To make the BLUP process faster, more \nbusiness-friendly and more legally certain, while ensuring that we do not compromise on \nsafety, proper planning, infrastructure, drainage, or environmental protection in the public \ninterest.  \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Jugurnauth. \nMr Jugurnauth: Yes. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, is the hon. Minister aware that more \namendments after all the clearance from all ministries, then again, the promoter has to pay more \nfor the designer, which is unfair? \nThe Deputy Speaker: What is your question? \nMr Jugurnauth: My question is whether amendment will made to remove this...  \nThe Deputy Speaker: So, you want the hon. Minister to review this system which is \nunfair?  \nMr Jugurnauth: The amendments. Yes, because after… \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Minister... \nMr Jugurnauth: …NELS, which is unfair for promoter to pay more. \nMr Woochit:  Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we will look into the matter because anyway, if \nthe hon. Member has any particular case in mind, he can come up and we can see it to it. We \nwill come with these regulations as soon as possible. We are working on it. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes. The hon. First Member for Rodrigues. I understand the hon. \nMinister of Foreign Affairs will answer this question.  \nAFRICAN REGIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANISATION \n(ARIPO) – E-FILING SYSTEM – PROCEDURES & SENSITISATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/591",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 591,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Industry, SME and Cooperative",
      "question": "(No. B/591) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nIndustry, SME and Cooperative whether, in regard to the African Regional Intellectual \nProperty Organisation (ARIPO) online e-filing system, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain information as to where matters stand regarding the implementation and effectiveness \nthereof in Mauritius, indicating the – \n(a) \nnumber of applications received, processed, approved and followed up, \nrespectively as at to date, and \n(b) \n sensitisation missions and capacity-building sessions being envisaged for \nIntellectual Property agents, attorneys-at-law and technical staff to ensure the \neffective adoption thereof nationwide. \nThe Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade (Mr \nD. Ramful): Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir.  \nFirst and foremost, allow me to inform the House that Mauritius acceded to the Harare \nProtocol on Patents, Utility Models and Industrial Designs on 27 May 2025. And our \nmembership to this protocol administered by the African Regional Intellectual Property \nOrganisation, in short form ARIPO, became effective on 27 August 2025.  \nHenceforth, whenever applications are filed by foreign applicants at ARIPO for the \nprotection of patents, utility models, and industrial designs, and where Mauritius is designated \nin such applications, the Industrial Property Office of Mauritius is notified of same through the \nMember States module, a tool designed by ARIPO, and the installation of which was effected \nby the ARIPO experts during their mission in Mauritius in April 2026.  \nThe MS module is an online notification and document exchange platform between \nARIPO and its member states. The notifications are done through the Industrial Property \nAutomation System, a software owned by the World Intellectual Property Organisation, in \nshort form WIPO, and already deployed and being used by the IP Office since 2013. The \nsuccessful installation of the Member State module required the involvement and contribution \nof WIPO and ARIPO experts, the Government Online Centre, as well as officers of the IT unit \nof my Ministry.  \nThe objectives of the ARIPO online services are to –  \n(i) \nenhance the efficiency and flexibility of business processing and other \nadministrative work at the ARIPO office, Member States IPOs, intellectual \nproperty agents, and the public at large.  \n(ii) \nfacilitate the accessibility and use of intellectual property information in the region \nand in Africa at large, and  \n(iii) strengthen ICT institutional capacity in the ARIPO region and beyond.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let me add that the implementation and use of this Member State \nmodule is still at an early stage, and I understand that a virtual meeting will be held in the near \nfuture engaging all the aforementioned stakeholders to test the practicability and effectiveness \nof this tool, address any challenges, and thereafter, enable the IP Office to notify ARIPO of the \noutcome of applications in which Mauritius has been designated.  \nHaving said so, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, allow me to also inform the House that my \nMinistry is seeking the assistance and guidance of ARIPO to domesticate the provisions of the \nHarare Protocol. This will entail the amendment of the existing legal framework on industrial \nproperty to ensure the proper implementation of the provisions relating to the Harare Protocol.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regards to part (a) of the question, that is, the number of \napplications received. According to the quarterly reports received from ARIPO for the periods \n01 October 2025 to 31 December 2025, and 01 January 2026 to 31 March 2026, Mauritius has \nbeen designated in – \nsix patent applications, which are still under process;  \n14 industrial design applications, 5 of which have been registered, and  \n1 utility model application, which is still under process. \nWith regard to part (b) of the question, I wish to inform the House that ARIPO, in \ncollaboration with my Ministry, organised an online sensitisation workshop at Caudan Arts \nCentre on 21 April 2026. The objective of the workshop was to enhance the uptake of the e-\nfiling services offered by ARIPO with a view to facilitating online filing of IP titles, payment \nof fees, and online tracking applications.  \nThis workshop targeted IP agents and attorneys, and other potential users of the ARIPO \nsystem. The ARIPO mission conducted capacity building sessions for the benefit of the \ntechnical staff of the IP Office on the deployment and use of the Member State module on the \nsecond day of the mission, and had a working session with some IP agents on the third day of \nthe mission. \nThank you.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: The hon. Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue.  \nINTERNATIONAL VACCINATION CENTRE – SERVICE DECENTRALISATION –",
      "answer": "REGIONAL HOSPITALS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/592",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 592,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/592) Mr L. Caserne (Third Member for Port Louis North & Montagne \nLongue) asked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the International \nVaccination Centre, he will state whether consideration will be given for the decentralisation \nof the services thereof to the Regional Hospitals and, if so, when and, if not, why not.",
      "answer": "Mr Bachoo: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed that the International Vaccination \nCentre has been designated to provide specialised vaccination services in line with international \nrequirements, including the administration of vaccines such as yellow fever, meningitis, Adacel \nvaccines, tetanus, diphtheria,  acellular pertussis, typhoid vaccines, COVID-19 vaccine for \ntravellers to Hajj, hepatitis A vaccines, pre-travel prophylaxis tablets for malaria, and the \nissuance of internationally recognised vaccination certificates. These vaccines are inoculated \nby the public health nursing cadre.  \nIn response to the hon. Member, I wish to state the following – \n(i) \nin respect of the current service model, the IVC operates as a centralised service to \nensure compliance with international standards for vaccine storage, handling and \ncertification, availability of trained personnel authorised to administer specific \ntravel vaccines and issue internationally recognised certificates, and adequate \nmonitoring of adverse events following vaccination. \n(ii) \ngovernment policy to ensure that all services provided under International Health \nOrganisations remain safe, standardised, and internationally compliant. The current \ncentralised model of the IVC has been effective in maintaining these standards.  \nWhile decentralisation improves geographical access, it must be clinically justified and \neconomically viable. Unlike routine immunisation services, travel-related vaccines are low in \nvolume and irregular in demand, especially with multi-dose vials. There is high risk of wastage \nif turn out is low and involves high-cost vaccines with short shelf life. There are cold chain \nrequirements such as yellow fever vaccine, which requires strict temperature control of 2 to 8 \ndegrees centigrade. It requires strict certification protocols under international regulations. \nThere is human resource limitation, that is need for specifically trained staff, for example, \npublic health nursing officers and community physicians and will necessitate additional \ninfrastructure.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in this context, indiscriminate decentralisation would result in \nunderutilisation of resources and potential wastage, similar to challenges already observed in \ncertain decentralised specialised services. As such, the International Vaccination Centre will \nremain the designated authority for specialised vaccines and certification. The priority of \nGovernment is not decentralisation, but rather providing efficient, safe, and internationally \ncompliant service delivery. The current approach ensures optimal use of public resources while \nprogressively improving accessibility where justified. \nThe Deputy Speaker: The Hon.  First Member for Montagne Blanche and GRSE.  \nBEL AIR & TROU D'EAU DOUCE – TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY – BUS \nROUTE & TAXI LICENCES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/593",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 593,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/593) Mr C.  Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to transport connectivity between Bel Air \nand Trou d'Eau Douce, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Land \nTransport Authority, information as to whether consideration will be given for the – \n (a) introduction of a new bus route along same; \n (b)  extension of the existing Route 55 from Trou d'Eau Douce to the proposed Mini \nTraffic Centre, and  \n(c)  issue of Public Service (Taxi) Licences for operation along same.",
      "answer": "Mr Osman Mahomed: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the NLTA that Bel \nAir and Trou d'Eau Douce are situated approximately four kilometres apart and there is \npresently no direct bus service operating along the corridor. \nI am further informed that connectivity between the two localities is currently ensured by \nthe traveling in two legs that is, from Bel Air to Bramsthan and from Bramsthan to Trou d'Eau \nDouce along route 16 or 18 and along route 55 respectively with services operating at an \naverage frequency of 30 minutes on each leg.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, with regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the \nNLTA that the introduction of a new dedicated bus route is not being envisaged at this stage in \nview of the relatively low direct passenger demand between these two localities.  \nI am made to understand that the predominant travel pattern of residents from both Bel \nAir and Trou d'Eau Douce is oriented towards Central Flacq which remains the main economic \nand service hub of the region.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (b) of the question, the extension of route 55 is \nnot being considered due to the relatively low passenger demand considerations. The NLTA is \ncurrently examining service optimisation measures including the possible extension of existing \nroute 56, Grand River South East to Flacq, operated by the NTC to serve Trou d'Eau Douce \nvia La Lucie Roy.  \nThis proposal will provide direct connectivity while ensuring more efficient utilisation \nof available resources. Implementation of this proposal will however be the subject of \nconsultations with the NTC and a road test to ascertain operational feasibility including the \navailability of a suitable turning radius.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (c) of the question, I am informed that there are \ncurrently 56 licensed taxis operating from Trou d'Eau Douce and 76 from Bel Air.  \nThe present level of taxi services is considered more than adequate by the NLTA to meet \nexisting demand for taxi services based on population density.  \nSome of these taxis operate as taxi train to provide direct services between Bel Air and \nTrou d'Eau Douce and complement for the present lack of buses on the basis of separate fares \nas provided under the law, that is, section 103(4) of the Road Traffic Act. Consequently, the \nissue of additional bus service, taxi licenses is not being envisaged.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I wish to remind the hon. Member that a meeting was held with \nthe hon. Dr. Ramtohul and hon. Dr. Saumtally on 26 January 2026, that is, some four months \nago following their request in my office. The hon. Baboolall was not able to attend because he \nwas traveling to Rodrigues and that, at a material time.  \nDuring the meeting, the transport challenges faced by the residents of Trou d'Eau Douce \nand Bel Air amongst others were discussed. Following those discussions, the NLTA has been \nactively exploring various avenues to enhance bus service delivery in the regions. Our \ncommitment to the inhabitants is evidenced by the proposed extension of route 56, like I \nexplained earlier, to serve Trou d'Eau Douce.  \nI am told that the NLTA is in discussions with the NTC for that purpose and a road test \nwill be held soon. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I can reassure the hon. Member that my Ministry, \ntogether with the NLTA, will continue to maintain close monitoring of transport needs across \nall regions. Should there be any significant evolution in demand patterns, appropriate \nadjustments will be considered in consultation with stakeholders to ensure that public transport \nprovision remains responsive, efficient and sustainable. \nThe Deputy Speaker: No. Okay. The hon. Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil! \nMRS R. A. AND MR A. M – FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMISSION \nDIRECTORS – COMPLAINTS & INVESTIGATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/594",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 594,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/594) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to Mrs R. A. and Mr \nA. M., directors at the Financial Services Commission, she will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain information as to the number and nature of the complaints received against them, \nindicating if investigations have been initiated therein and, if so, indicate the – \n(a) \nfindings thereof and actions taken in relation thereto, and \n(b) \ntotal cost incurred therefor. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, before you answer, hon. Dr. Prayag, you have a question \nafter that, after B/595, you have to resume your seat.  \nYes, hon. Minister.",
      "answer": "Dr. Ms Jeetun: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the FSC that four complaints \nhave been received in respect of Mrs R. A and one complaint in respect of Mr A. M. Two of \nthe complaints relating to Mrs R. A were by way of anonymous letters, one received at the FSC \nin September 2022 and one forwarded by the Financial Crimes Commission in July 2024. The \nremaining two complaints were from staff and were received in September 2024 and November \n2025 respectively. As regards the one complaint relating to Mr A. M, it was received in \nDecember 2025 and was from a staff member of the FSC.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (a) of the question, the complaints made against \nMrs R. A in the anonymous letter received in September 2022, related to allegations of \ncollusion between the Director and the Managing Director of a management company. As per \nthe findings of the inquiry, the collusion referred to in the complaint letter was not established.  \nHowever, it was concluded that supervision was negligent in addressing the complaints \nthat were received against the MC and its officers. Written explanations were sought from the \nconcerned officers including Mrs R.A. However, the board had requested that the matter be put \non hold. \n In July 2024, the Financial Crimes Commission, (FCC), informed the FSC of an email \nfrom an anonymous source alleging collusion between a licensee and Mrs R.A. The \nenforcement directorate of the FSC could not pursue the matter further as the FCC did not have \nany additional information as required by the FSC to initiate an investigation.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards the three complaints from staff of the FSC against \nMrs R.A and Mr A. M, the status is as follows; one of the complaints against Mrs. R.A is \nexpected to be resolved with the organisational review that the FSC is currently undertaking \nand as regards the two other complaints, the respective internal inquiries initiated by the FSC \nare still ongoing.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as regards part (b) of the question, the total cost involved are, \nfirstly, for the inquiry carried out regarding the anonymous letter received in respect of Mrs \nR.A in 2022, the FSC retained the services of an external law firm at the total cost of Rs402,500. \nAs regards the complaint from the staff against Mrs R.A received in November 2025, the FSC \nhas retained the services of an external legal counsel at the cost of Rs115,000 plus VAT.  \nAs regards the complaint from the staff of the FSC against Mr A.M, the FSC has enlisted \nthe services of an external legal counsel to carry out a full investigation at the cost of Rs125,000 \nplus VAT. Thank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes, hon. Beechook! \nMr Beechook: Yes, thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. May I know from the hon. \nMinister, how many times Mrs R.A had been suspended and reintegrated to her post? \nDr. Ms Jeetun: From what I understand, she was recruited in March 2019. I don't have \ninformation regarding her suspension. During the investigation in December 2022, I believe \nshe was asked to be out of office, not to be present on the premises during the investigation. \nBut I understand that notice was not served but instead she was on sick leave and then on annual \nleave. I don't have any information regarding a suspension from the FSC. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Yes. \nMr Beechook: Does the hon. Minister have the information to please inform the House, \nwhy was Mr A.M promoted to the post of Head of Supervision Directorate despite having no \nexperience in global business, funds and capital markets? \nDr. Ms Jeetun:  Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, from what I understand, the structure of that \ndepartment which is the directorate called supervision, it had a Director and then it has five \ndepartments and Mr A. M was heading one of those departments.  \nAs per the procedures and the policies in place at the FSC, he was the highest in the grade \nwhen there was a reorganisation. The Director of that supervision was moved to another \ndepartment. Mr A.M. was the most senior in terms of grade. That is why he was given that. It \nwas not a promotion. It was a temporary measure of assigning additional responsibilities to \noversee the Supervision Department. \n The Deputy Speaker: Yes! You have another one? \nMr Rookny: Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, could the hon. Minister please advise as regards \nto Mrs. R.A., since it was found that supervision was superficial, did that committee find out \nwho was responsible for such superficiality? What actions have been taken to prevent future \noccurrences? \nDr. Ms Jeetun:  So that happened in 2022. The collusion itself was not established, but \nthey found that there may have been weaknesses in the procedures and the way the complaint \nwas handled. The charges were prepared. But I understand that the board, at that time, was told \nto put everything on hold.  \nI must say, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that there is a new board in place at the FSC. There \nis a new director in place. There is major restructuring going on. They have recruited an \nexternal professional consultant who is doing a restructuring exercise that will be completed \nby June. The whole organisation of FSC is being re-looked into because there has been quite a \nlot of mismanagement and issues at the FSC, as many of my colleagues are aware. There are \nso many questions that have been put on FSC’s operations. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Last one! \nMr Beechook: I have a question, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir. As the former Head of the \nInsurance Department, is the hon. Minister aware what was the involvement of Mr A.M. in the \nAfri Life Insurance Ltd., owned by one Mr Prateek Gupta, who is the ultimate beneficiary \nowner of the Silver Bank? \nDr. Ms Jeetun: The question is not part of the of the main question. So, I can find out. \nI can investigate. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Okay. \n The hon. First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart! \nTERRE ROUGE–VERDUN–TRIANON LINK ROAD –TRAFFIC CONGESTION \nALLEVIATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/595",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 595,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/595) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Terre Rouge Verdun – Trianon Link Road, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Road Development Authority, information \nas to whether any survey has been carried out to assess the effectiveness thereof in alleviating \ntraffic congestion, particularly, in relation to traffic flow through Port Louis and, if so, indicate \nthe outcome thereof and further indicate whether  any survey has been carried out on the \nenhancement of traffic flow along the said corridor.",
      "answer": "The Minister of National Infrastructure (Mr A. Gunness): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, \nwith your permission, I shall reply to this Parliamentary Question.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Road Development Authority is responsible for the \nconstruction, care, maintenance and improvement of main roads and motorways, while the \nTraffic Management and Road Safety Unit, which operates under the purview of the Ministry \nof Land Transport, is responsible for the traffic management and congestion alleviation. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the construction of the Terre Rouge-Verdun-Trianon link road, \nnow known as Motorway M3, was completed in December 2013 and was implemented \nfollowing a feasibility study having as main objectives to reduce congestion on Motorways M1 \nand M2 and improve travel time and connectivity between the north and the centre of the island. \nThe project also contributes to boost economic development, enhance road network resilience \nby providing an alternate route and creating new development opportunities. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am informed by the TRMSU that prior to the construction and \nopening of the Motorway M3, the main route for vehicles travelling between the southern and \nnorthern parts of the island was through Port Louis via Motorways M1 and M2. A study carried \nout by the TMRSU in 2011 indicated that through traffic accounted for approximately 30% of \ntotal traffic converging daily towards Port Louis, thereby contributing significantly to \ncongestion along these corridors. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am also informed by the TMRSU that no specific post-\nimplementation study has been carried out in the subsequent years following the \ncommissioning of the project to assess its effectiveness. However, once it opened to traffic, the \nMotorway M3 provided an alternative route for through traffic, thereby reducing dependence \non Port Louis as a transit point. Observations at the time indicated an immediate improvement \nin traffic flow along Motorways M1, M2. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, as the House is aware, over the past decade, Mauritius has \nexperienced a significant increase in the number of registered vehicles, rising from 486,144 in \n2015 to 746,961 in 2025, representing an increase of approximately 53%. This has resulted in \nincreased traffic volumes across the road network and has contributed to worsening congestion \nalong Motorways M1 and M2 towards Port Louis. \n According to traffic counts carried out in 2025 by the TMRSU, approximately 4,300 \nvehicles per hour travel towards Port Louis from the south via Motorway M1 during peak \nhours, while approximately 3,600 vehicles travel from the north via Motorway M2 per hour. \n The most recent traffic count along the Motorway M3 was carried out in 2018 by the \nTMRSU. Adjusting for the increase in traffic over the years, it is estimated that approximately \n3,100 vehicles travel towards Ebène from the north at the Côte d'Or roundabout during peak \nhours, 7.45 a.m. to 9.30 a.m., while approximately 2,500 vehicles travel in the opposite \ndirection. In the absence of the M3, this traffic would otherwise have passed through Port Louis \nvia Motorways M1 and M2, further aggravating congestion on these corridors. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in addition to the construction of Motorway M3 as an alternate \nroute with a view to addressing congestion, the RDA has completed several projects along \nMotorways M1 and M2 to further improve the level of service of its road network. Grade \nseparated junctions and flyovers have been implemented at Caudan, Quay D, Terre Rouge, and \nLa Vigie. A third lane has also been added on Motorway M1 between Terre Rouge and Roche \nBois. Further traffic modelling exercises are being carried out at Mapou and Labourdonnais \nroundabout for future interventions. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the RDA further intends to facilitate access to Motorway M3 \nthrough the construction of slip lanes at Côte d'Or and Ripailles roundabouts. These slip lanes \nwill allow road users to gain access to the motorway in less time and contribute to an overall \nimprovement in the traffic fluidity along the corridor and connecting roads. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, moreover, Government intends to proceed with the \nimplementation of the Ring Road Phase 2 project, which is expected to significantly alleviate \ntraffic congestion in and around Port Louis and act as an alternate route for road users who do \nnot need to pass through the city centre. This new strategically will help redistribute traffic \ncurrently using the M1 Motorway and key junctions within Port Louis, thereby reducing \npressure on heavily congested corridors during peak hours. \n It will also improve connectivity between existing roads and enhance the overall \nresilience and efficiency of the national road network. Besides, Government will implement a \nflyover project at Camp Fouquereaux to render the traffic more fluid. \n Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, in the meantime, I am requesting the RDA to carry out a joint \nsurvey with the Police and the TMRSU, including a fresh traffic count, to determine immediate \nmeasures to alleviate the traffic situation along Motorway M3. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Time is over!  \nHon. Members, the Table has been advised that the following PQs have been withdrawn: \nB/596, B/597, B/598, B/599, B/602, B/606, B/607, B/608, B/609, B/610, B/611, B/612, B/613, \nB/614, B/616, B/617, B/618, B/619, B/622, B/623, B/624, B/625, B/626, B/627, and B/628. \nMOTION \nSUSPENSION OF S.O. 10(2) \nThe Minister of Housing and Lands (Mr S. Mohamed): Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I beg \nto move that all the business on today’s Order Paper be exempted from the provisions of \nparagraph (2) of Standing Order 10.  \nDr. Boolell rose and seconded.  \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nPUBLIC BILL \nSecond Reading \nTHE CERTIFICATE OF CHARACTER BILL \n(No. II of 2026) \nOrder read for resuming adjourned debate on the Second Reading of the Certificate of \nCharacter Bill (No. II of 2026).   \nQuestion again proposed.  \nThe Deputy Speaker: Hon. Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research, Dr. \nSukon! \n(4.20 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Tertiary Education, Science and Research (Dr. K. Sukon): Mr \nDeputy Speaker, Sir, I rise in full support of this Bill. I must say many of us from both sides of \nthis House must have met young people, parents, mothers and fathers in tears. Why? Because \ntheir son or daughter could not secure a job because of the 'certificat de moralité'. Very often \nwe are asked the question. The Government is giving free education up to the university level, \nis giving free transport, is providing textbooks freely for many grades. Then why is the law \nitself closing the doors? Why is this document, 'certificat de moralité' not allowing our son, \nour daughter to secure that job? What do we want as parents? We would like them to have a \ndecent life and a decent life depends on a decent job. The question put to us: why are you \nallowing to shatter the dream of not only the young person but also the entire family? Pourquoi \nce document administratif est en train de condamner l'avenir de ce jeune même avant qu'il soit \nécrit ?  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we cannot tell someone, ‘study hard, work hard, train hard, \ndream big' and then allow the law to keep opportunities out of reach. We cannot say, 'build your \nfuture', but we will continue to judge you by your past. Contrairement à l'ancien régime qui \nn'a pas jugé bon de revoir ce dispositif, nous ne restons pas les bras croisés.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, that is why today I want to speak beyond this Chambre. I want \nto speak to every student. I want to speak to every parent. I want to speak to every mother and \nfather who want one thing above all else for their child: a fair chance in life. I want to tell them \nthat this Bill is not only about certificate. It is about justice. It is about fairness. It is about \nopportunity. It is about hope and above all about second chances.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, the current Act does one thing good; it protects the public. But \nit does one thing in a very undesirable way; it traps too many people in the past for too long. \nThis Bill changes that by raising the fine threshold and reducing the waiting period for several \noffences. Thus, it ensures that the minor offences do not continue to haunt the individuals for \nlong. This is a major reform.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, it rests on a simple idea. Law must make the difference between \ndanger and reform. It must distinguish between serious crime and lesser offending. It must \ndistinguish between someone who remains a risk and someone who has changed. This is not \nsoftness, this is fairness. This is proportion and this is wisdom.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, now let me say something very clearly to the country. The Bill \nis not soft on crime. Serious offences will still remain on the certificate. Grave wrongdoing \nremains visible because the public must be protected. So, this Bill does not weaken protection. \nIt keeps protection strong.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am really impressed by the balance in this Bill. It is firm where \nfirmness is required. It is fair where fairness is required. It is protective of society but not blind \nto rehabilitation. It is serious about crime but also serious about human dignity. That is why I \nwould like to thank the hon. Prime Minister and the hon. Attorney General for this Bill.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this Bill says something very clearly. The person who made a \nlesser mistake, paid the price, rebuilds their life and respects the law, then the State should not \ncontinue punishing them forever. That matters in real life. It matters to the young person trying \nto get a first job. It matters to the parent who wants to see a child stand tall again. It matters to \nthe family who wants to move from worry to stability, and that is why as the Minister of Tertiary \nEducation, Science and Research, I feel strongly about this Bill.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I want to speak directly now to every young person who may \nhave stumbled, learned, matured and changed. Your life is not over. Your future matters. And \nto every parent, your child must not be defined by one bad moment. It is a fact that parents \nbelieve children can grow. Parents believe children can learn. They can correct themselves. \nThey can they can come back stronger. This Bill honours that belief. Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, \nfor several young persons, the road from education to employment can sometimes be hard \nbecause it depends on internship, apprenticeship, placement, first job, technical training and \nresearch opportunities. One old and lesser offence can shut all those doors completely at once. \nThis Bill helps them open again.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, we cannot tell a young person, ‘improve yourself', but we will \nnever recognise that improvement. That would be unjust. That would be short-sighted and it \nwould waste precious national talent. Mauritius cannot afford to waste talent – not the talent of \nour students, not the talent of our graduates, not the talent of young people who are ready to \nwork, who are ready to contribute and ready to move forward.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, this Bill also introduces an important principle of fairness in \nemployment. Where a conviction is not related to the job, it cannot be used to discriminate \napplicants. That is a very important message to employers and to the public. Because the right \nquestion is not that: has this person ever been convicted? The right question: is that conviction \nrelevant to that job? This is fairness. This is common sense and this is justice with intelligence. \nThe Bill says something better. It says to the graduate, do not give up. It says to the families, \nhope is still alive. It says to the nation, we can protect the public without giving up on our \npeople.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, a strong country is not one that punishes forever. A strong \ncountry is one that knows when punishment has done its work. A wise society is not one that \nconfuses stigma and safety. A wise society is one that protects the public while still making \nroom for redemption. That is what this Bill does. It protects society. It restores proportion. It \nsupports employment. It helps students and young people move forward. It gives parents \nsomething precious – reassurance. Reassurance that the law can still be fair. Reassurance that \nthe future is still open. Reassurance that one mistake does not have to be a life sentence of \nexclusion.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, let this message be heard clearly across the nation. To the \nstudents watching, your future is bigger than your minor mistake. To the parents listening, your \nchild is worth believing in. To the families across this country, there can be a second chapter. \nAnd to the nation, justice must protect, but justice must also lift. This is a sound Bill, a fair Bill, \na humane Bill, and a necessary Bill.  \nMr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to reassure all those concerned. I recently met a \nfather, a mother and a son. The father is a fisherman. The mother is a housewife. They came to \nsee me because – like my colleague, hon. Uteem, said, erreur de jeunesse – he could not secure \na job. I told the parents to just wait and that soon this nightmare will be over.  \nSo, Mr Deputy Speaker, Sir, I, wholeheartedly, commend the Certificate of Character Bill \nto this House.  \nThank you. \nThe Deputy Speaker: Thank you.  \nI suspend the sitting for half an hour. \nAt 4.33 p.m., the Sitting was suspended. \nOn resuming at 5.07 p.m. with Madam Speaker in the Chair. \nMadam Speaker: C’est bon, you may be seated! \nYes, hon. Minister of Gender, it is your turn! \nThe Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare (Ms A. Navarre-Marie): \nMerci Madame la présidente.  \nMadame la présidente, the Certificate of Character Bill est un projet de loi qui va changer \ndes vies. Des changements concrets que les Mauriciennes et les Mauriciens vont ressentir dans \nleur vie, dans leur recherche d'emploi. Des milliers de personnes attendent ce moment depuis \ntrop longtemps.  \nMadame la présidente, quelque part à Maurice, aujourd'hui, une personne s'est rendue à \nun entretien d'embauche. Elle était préparée. Elle était qualifiée. Elle était prête. Mais, elle n'a \npas obtenu le poste. Non pas parce qu'elle manquait de compétences, non pas parce qu'elle a \néchoué à l'entretien, mais à cause de quelque chose qu'elle a faite il y a 15 ans et pour laquelle \nelle a déjà payé, pour laquelle elle a purgé sa peine et payé peut-être une amende. Quelque \nchose qu'elle a depuis longtemps laissé derrière elle. Mais, son certificat de moralité en a décidé \nautrement et la porte s'est refermée. Et ce n'est pas un cas isolé.  \nÀ travers toute l'île, la même scène se répète dans des foyers, des régions et des vies \ndifférentes. Le résultat est prévisible : le rejet, l'humiliation, l'exclusion. Non pas parce que \ncette personne représente un danger pour la société et qu'elle a récidivé mais parce qu'un \nsystème conçu pour protéger le public est, aujourd'hui, détourné de sa vocation et est utilisé \npour stigmatiser définitivement des personnes, pour les marquer comme inaptes bien \nlongtemps après qu'elles aient démontré le contraire. Ce n'est pas de la justice. C'est une double \npeine. Et c'est une peine qui frappe de manière disproportionnée les jeunes, les plus démunis \net les rend incapables de s'en sortir. Et les conséquences ne s'arrêtent pas à l'individu. Elles se \npropagent. Les familles en souffrent. Lorsqu'un parent ne peut pas trouver du travail à cause \nd'une condamnation ancienne, ce sont les enfants qui en payent le prix. La suite, on la connaît. \nPrécarité, instabilité et le sentiment que leur famille est d'une façon ou d'une autre marquée par \nl'État comme étant inférieur.  \nMadame la présidente, ce projet de loi est une avancée concrète et soulagera des milliers \nde personnes qui ont besoin que la société leur accorde une seconde chance. Ce projet de loi \nvient corriger une situation injuste avec proportionnalité et humanité. D'abord, il prévoit que \ncertaines condamnations mineures, sous condition et après un délai déterminé, ne figurent plus \nsur le certificat, permettant ainsi une véritable réinsertion. Ensuite, il consacre un principe \nfondamental. Une personne ne peut être discriminée à l'embauche pour une infraction sans lien \navec l'emploi concerné.  \nMadame la présidente, s'il est vrai que ce projet de loi modernise notre justice et ouvre \nde nouvelles perspectives, il est tout aussi vrai que notre devoir est de protéger les plus \nvulnérables, ceux qui sont sans défense, c'est-à-dire les enfants. La protection de l'enfant reste \nnotre priorité absolue. Cette modernisation que nous apportons ne se fera jamais au détriment \nde la protection des enfants. Bien au contraire !  \nEt je salue le fait que ce projet de loi maintient avec fermeté l'obligation de faire \napparaître sur le certificat de moralité toutes les condamnations liées à des infractions graves \ncommises à l'encontre des enfants, notamment celles prévues dans le Children's Act 2020, \nl'abus sexuel, la prostitution des enfants, le grooming, la pornographie enfantine et l'enlèvement \nd'enfants, entre autres. Ce choix est fondamental. Il traduit une volonté claire et non négociable \ndu gouvernement. Aucun compromis lorsqu'il s'agit de la sécurité, de la protection et du bien-\nêtre des enfants.  \nEn ma qualité de ministre responsable de la protection des enfants, je suis \nparticulièrement attentive à la cohérence entre le Certificate of Character Bill et le Children's \nAct 2020. Ce dernier établit un cadre robuste pour la protection des mineurs. Le texte présenté \npar l'Attorney General vient renforcer ce cadre en s'assurant que les informations pertinentes \ndemeurent accessibles chaque fois que la sécurité d'un enfant est en jeu. Madame la présidente, \nnous ouvrons une porte certes, mais nous ne baissons pas la garde.  \nMadam Speaker, let us be clear. Mauritius is not reinventing the wheel. We are catching \nup with a global movement that has recognised for well over a decade that permanent criminal \nrecords are bad for individuals, families and society. Across the world, jurisdictions are \nembracing what is now widely known as clean slate legislation. In the US alone, more than 19 \nstates have now enacted some form of automatic record clearing. Pennsylvania was the first in \n2016. New York followed suit in 2024, automatically sealing misdemeanour convictions after \nthree years, and felonies after eight, recognising that a person's past should not determine his \nor her future when he or she has demonstrated rehabilitation.  \nAcross continental Europe, the principle is universal. Justice must include the possibility \nof redemption. The evidence is compelling. Studies consistently show that post-conviction \nemployment dramatically reduces recidivism. When a person finds work, they are far less likely \nto reoffend.  \nConversely, when employment is denied and the no door is permanently shut, despair \nsets in and the cycle of marginalisation continues. The economic argument is powerful. Cost \nbenefit analysis indicates that clearing criminal records produce net benefits for society through \nincreased tax revenues, reduced dependence on social assistance and lower costs to the criminal \njustice system. In a small island economy like Mauritius, every working adult matters. Every \nexcluded citizen is a cost to all of us.  \nMadam Speaker, as the Minister responsible for family welfare, I want one and all to \nunderstand that the damage done by an uncleared criminal record is never confined to one \nperson. When a parent cannot find a stable job, children grow up in financial precarity. When \na young person is repeatedly rejected by the job market, the risk of radicalisation, substance \nabuse and further offending arises. When families are trapped in poverty by the administrative \nstigma of an old conviction, the entire family unit is destabilised. These are the families that \nhave recourse to our services, to our family support services. These are the stories our social \nworkers hear every week. \nMadam Speaker, this Bill will not solve all our social challenges, but it removes one \nmajor unnecessary barrier that has been crushing the potential of too many of our citizens. For \nthe Ministry of Gender Equality and Family Welfare, this is not merely a criminal justice \nreform. It is a family welfare reform. A social cohesion reform. \n My thoughts go to those young persons who have had an issue with the justice system, \nwho have served their time and rebuilt their lives, but who keep on being excluded from the \nformal economy. Their families depend on their ability to find a decent job. This Bill gives \nthem that opportunity.  \nMadam Speaker, we believe in second chances and in the capacity of human beings to \nchange. We believe that justice must be proportionate and that a society which permanently \nexcludes its own citizens from economic life is a society that is failing itself.  \nMadame la présidente, ce projet de loi est mesuré et responsable. Il n'efface pas les \ncondamnations graves, ne diminue pas les droits des victimes et n'ouvre pas la porte à \nl'impunité. Ce qu'il fait avec discernement, c'est reconnaître que pour les infractions mineures, \naprès qu'un délai suffisant se soit écoulé et que la réhabilitation ait été démontrée, l'État doit \npermettre aux gens d'avancer.  \nNous sommes une petite société, nous ne pouvons pas nous permettre de mettre \ndéfinitivement de côté le potentiel humain et nous permettre le coût social de l'exclusion. Et \nnous ne pouvons pas, en toute conscience, continuer à maintenir un système qui punit les gens \nnon pas pour ce qu'ils sont aujourd'hui, mais pour ce qu'ils étaient il y a des années.  \nJe vous remercie. \nMadam Speaker: Hon. Subron!  \n(5.20 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity (Mr A. Subron): Madam Speaker, this House is debating a critical piece of legislation. What we are \ndebating today is deeply rooted within our own harsh history.  \nThis Bill aims at transcending the contradiction of the inherently inhuman history of our \nown society. A history of class exploitation, class bias, class prejudices and control. Today, we \nare heading towards a significant rehabilitation of all those from the lower class who have been \nvictims of humiliations, prejudices, harassment, just because they were part of the working \nclass and the poor layer of our society.  \nHow many of them have been denied an employment promotion just because they could \nnot produce this piece of paper which was asked by the employer class? \nHow many of them have been compelled to endure hardships just because they could not \nhave this piece of paper or have convictions for which they already paid for, dated back several \nyears ago, written on this famous piece of paper? \nMadam Speaker, given that many hon. Members articulately addressed the social \nreintegration dimension of the Bill for not convicting a second time somebody who has duly \nand legally paid for his sentence, I fully align myself to their views.  \nFor my part, I will contribute to the debate by highlighting the historical and class \ndimension of the issues being raised and addressed by this Bill. Madam Speaker, many eminent \nhistorians consider the practice of requiring documents like a Certificate of Character, formerly, \nthe Certificate of Morality, to be a legacy of our colonial control systems, which directly \nfollowed the abolition of slavery in Mauritius.  \nWhile it is true that the modern certificate is a standard legal document, its historical \nroots in Mauritius are undeniably tied to the transition from slavery system to indentured labour \nand colonial legacy. During the slavery era, enslaved people were physically tagged or were \nsubjected to various forms of identifications to maintain control and enforce property rights of \nslave owners. If they were found outside their boundaries, they could be arrested, punished or \nexecuted for marronage. Underwater archaeology near shipwrecks such as Le Coureur, \nwrecked in 1821, has yielded metal identification tags used during the slavery era.  \nAfter slavery was abolished in 1835, the colonial government introduced vagrancy laws \nto ensure a steady supply of cheap labour for sugar estates. These laws criminalised idleness \nand introduced the famous ‘rogue and vagabond’ charge. If a formerly enslaved person or \nindentured labourer could not prove they were under a valid labour contract or outside their \nzone, they were arrested as vagrants. To avoid arrest and secure employment, workers had to \nprovide proof of their good conduct or morality to the new employers. This is the ancestral \norigin of the Certificate of Morality. This is what evolved into an administrative practice where \nthe police or the Director of Public Prosecutions verify that a person had not been a maroon or \na vagrant.  \nThe Truth and Justice Commission argues that these requirements stem from the logic of \nsurveillance, the afterlife of slavery, used to maintain a disciplined and moral workforce in a \nsociety where labour was once forced. Let me refer to a few of our eminent historians. For Dr. \nVijaya Teelock, I quote – \n“Every economic system aims to find cheap and disciplined labour. Thus, the concepts \nof marronage during slavery and vagrancy during indenture both sought to control the \nmovement of slaves and indentured labourers.” \nDr. Teelock adds – \n“Through vagrancy laws, the colonial authorities prevented “free labour competition” \nwhereby labourers would go around estates to assess which one had the best working \nconditions. The most substantial remnants of vagrancy heritage can be found in Grand \nRiver North West, where the vagrant depot lies. Legally, the concept of vagrancy still \nsurvives in the Criminal Code under the terms of ‘idle’ or ‘rogue and vagabond’.” \nSecond, in forbidden freedom, the experience of vagrants at the vagrant depot of Grand \nRiver North West and other vagrants in British Mauritius, referenced 1879 to 1905. Satyendra \nPeerthum, researcher at Aapravasi Ghat Trust Fund, notes that under colonial laws, a vagrant \nwas someone with no valid pass, who did not have a permanent place of abode, or who was \nnot working under a labour contract.  \nMadam Speaker, the Mauritius Truth and Justice Commission concluded that \ncontemporary discrimination, including class discrimination, is not an accident, but a direct \nlegacy of the logic of control established during the colonial era to manage enslaved and \nindentured populations. Today, the certificate is framed as a security measure to protect \nworkplaces. However, the debate remains that the high pressure to present a clean certificate \nfor even basic labour reflects a historical distrust of the working class rooted in the colonial \nperiod.  \nMadam Speaker, in 2006, the administrative practice inherited from our history for \nemployers’ clearance from the police or the DPP to verify that a person is clean was henceforth \nregulated. The Certificate of Morality Act was voted to make better provision for the issue of \nCertificate of Morality by the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions. It was introduced \nby the then Attorney General and Minister of Justice and Human Rights, the then hon. Rama \nValayden. The law made the request to issue a Certificate of Morality a right of the person, not \nthe employer. Without challenging the very practice of employers requesting such certificate \nfor employment purposes.  \nIn year 2012, a new law replacing the Certificate of Morality by the current Certificate \nof Character was enacted. Besides for the first time listing the various types of offences which \nwould appear on a Certificate of Character, the major feature of this law was the fact of the \ncodification, for the first time in our history, of the very practice of employers seeking clearance \ncertificate for their employees.  \nWhile in the first law, the Certificate of Morality, it was the citizen who had the sole right \nto apply for such a certificate, the present law, which we are changing right now, introduced \nthe principle of an employer applying for a Certificate of Character on behalf of a worker. \nSection 4(3) of the present law stipulates that an employer may with the written consent of a \nworker, apply for the issue of a certificate in the name of the worker.  \nNow, Madam Speaker, one might argue that the employer would need with the written \nconsent of a worker but anyone who knows the world of work would agree that no worker \nseeking a job or a promotion from an employer would be in a position not to give such a \nconsent. So, it established a de facto power of employer to apply for the certificate. The present \nlaw is reminiscent of our slavery, indentured and colonial history. It indeed reflects a historical \ndistrust of the working class rooted in the colonial period.  \nBefore coming directly to the Bill in this House, let me highlight a few fundamental facts. \nOr let me now move to the other side of the coin. If it was a practice for centuries till now, for \ncompanies, employers to seek from someone from the working class to prove himself to be \nsound and certified with the correct morality or character to have a basic right for employment, \nthe same was not true and still to a large extent not applicable to the owner of capital, proprietor \nof local companies or the designated directors. As if there is a superhuman-privileged class, a \nsubhuman class or social group in our society.  \nIn times of slavery, slave owners were considered superhuman and had nothing to justify. \nThey derived the superhuman power from the Code noir during the French period and from \nBritish slavery laws from 1811 to 1835. In times of indenture, the propertied class were \nconsidered as subhuman by the law and other subhuman but subject to vagrant, idle, rogue and \nvagabond laws. Madam Speaker, today's society still bear the scars of old days. This is the \ntruth. This is our truth. For example, the Companies Law – no such clearance of a Certificate \nof Morality or Character is needed for any shareholder or higher management of companies.  \n Section 337 of the Companies Act 2010 prohibits some categories of persons from \nmanaging companies but it does not require a Certificate of Morality or Character and offenses \nlisted therein. True, in recent years, foreign companies, especially in financial sectors, are \nrequired a Certificate of Character and are subject to due diligence, but same does not apply \nfor the quasi majority of employers operating in Mauritius. \n The ethic of our laws is still class biased and class discriminate. It upholds that those \nwho detain capital, the means of protection, even if they are rapists, misogynists or criminals, \nare persons of high morality or character. While those who are from the working class, the poor \nand lower strata, are de facto potential criminals and stigmatised. \n Madam Speaker, let me directly come to the Bill we are debating today. The present \nBill, while it does not eliminate the very principle of employers requesting Certificate of \nCharacter from an employee, nevertheless fundamentally limits, alters or even nullifies its \napplication. First, the Bill repeals the present section of the Certificate of Character Act, \nwhereby an employer may, with the written consent of a worker, apply for the issue of a \ncertificate in the name of the worker. \nThis section is simply eliminated. Bravo, hon. Attorney General. Second, the new Bill \nintroduces a significant proviso on the usage of the Certificate of Character by prospective \nemployer. Section 4 on non-discrimination in employment provide – \n“Where a person's Certificate of Character specifies that he has been convicted of a \ncrime or misdemeanour – \n(a) his employer shall not discriminate against him where the crime or  \nmisdemeanour is not related to the employment; or \n(b) his prospective employer shall not discriminate against him where \nthe crime or misdemeanour is not related to the employment for \nwhich he is being considered.” \nThird, the Bill introduced not only non-discrimination clauses in the application of the \nCertificate of Employment, but the Bill provides the mechanism for the enforcement of this \nsection. In section 12, consequential amendment, the Equal Opportunities Act is amended in \nsection 10(1) by inserting where subject to 10(2), that a person's Certificate of Character \ncertified that he has been convicted of a crime or misdemeanour, which is not related to his \nemployment or to the employment for which is he is considered, thus reinforcing the \napplication of the non-discrimination clause. \n Fourth, the Bill fundamentally alters the very consent of the Certificate of Character by \nsubstantially limiting the offenses to be listed in the first schedule, eliminate small fines up to \nRs50,000 and provides changes in line with a more human dignity consideration. \n Madam Speaker, I have focused my intervention and contribution to the debate on social \nhistorical and employment related angle, given my trade union activist experiences but I \ncannot, as Minister of Social Integration, not salute the twin fundamental dimension of this \nBill. That is the great qualitative leap forwards in terms of social reintegration of persons who \nalready have paid for their convictions. \n A conviction given at any moment in one's life can never be transformed in a form of \nlife sentence by society. Let me again say kudos to the hon. Attorney General and my \ncolleagues of the Cabinet to contribute to bring such a positive Bill in this Assembly. It is this \ntype of initiative which make me and my party to be proud to be in this Government. It is it is \nthis kind of legislation which honours the hundreds of thousands of people who have voted for \nus in the last general election. To them, we owe our seat in this Assembly. To them, we are \nhere to serve.  \nThank you, Madam Speaker. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you and thank you for keeping the time. \n(5.38 p.m.) \nThe Minister of Housing and Lands (Mr S. Mohamed): Thank you, Madam Speaker. \nI will also try my best, even though I have never been known for someone who is a very good \npupil when it comes to that, to sticking to time. \n So, I rise, Madam Speaker… \nMadam Speaker: Just at look me in the eyes. \nMr Mohamed: That is the dangerous part. You know, that is the dangerous part. That \nwould sidetrack me, please.  \nSo, Madam Speaker, I rise in support of this Certificate of Character Bill. I have heard \nall those who have intervened before me, be it at the last Sitting and today. And they have \nexpatiated upon the very positives in this Bill; the idea, the object, the philosophy. I shall not \ngo into that much detail, but allow me to add the following. This is at its heart a Bill about \nbalance. Accountability matters, but rehabilitation also matters. Where a person has served his \nsentence, stayed within the law and tried to rebuild his life, the law should not impose needless \nand indefinite obstacles to work in dignity. That is not leniency. That is justice properly \nunderstood. Crucially, Madam Speaker, this Bill is not soft on crime. \n The First Schedule still requires mandatory disclosure of serious offenses, including \nmurder, manslaughter, rape, child sexual abuse, child pornography, trafficking in persons, \nfinancing of terrorism, bribery, money laundering and arson. Lesser and dated convictions may \nin defined circumstances no longer block a person's future. Serious offending remains visible. \nThat is responsible lawmaking. \nAnd so, I commend the hon. Attorney General for this excellent piece of legislation and \nthe officers of his office. Now, Madam Speaker, I have listened very carefully to hon. Subron, \nthe one who preceded me, and he talked, he painted this historical picture of the source of the \nCertificate of Character. Allow me to say, and I will add my little piece to it, if I may. So, the \nvery expression certificat de moralité comes from continental, specifically French, legal and \nadministrative tradition. In French and francophone legal systems, the long-standing \ninstrument was certificat de bonne vie et mœurs; a document attesting to a person's good \nconduct and moral standing. The Dictionnaire de l'Académie Française defines it as a \ncertificate attesting the good conduct and morality of an individual. In its original sense, this \nwas not a criminal record. It was not a criminal record check. It was a moral attestation, often \nissued by the local official, a mayor, a parish priest, vouching for the good reputation, good \nconduct and good morals of the person. In 19th century France, for example, the mayor \ndelivered the obligatory certificat de moralité required for school teachers under Loi Guizot of \n1833 and Loi Falloux of 1850. \n Now, in Mauritius, we inherited this concept through its French, our French legal \ntradition which survived the British takeover of 1810 in the form of the Code Napoléon and a \ndeep base of French civil and administrative practice. The expression certificat de moralité \ntherefore entered Mauritian usage from this francophone administrative culture, even as the \ncolony became British. \nI would like to add on this historical part, a doctoral thesis on Freemasonry in Mauritius \nfrom 1778 to 1950 records the following: by the 19th century, the certificat de moralité was \nused in Mauritius as a substitute for the casier judiciaire. The criminal record, le Grand Orient, \nwas informed that the certificat de moralité replaced the casier judiciaire in Mauritius. This is \na crucial point. In Mauritius, the certificat de moralité fused two different ideas: the French \nmoral attestation and the criminal record check into a single document. So, this is, for my part, \na little part of history that I think it is important to put in context.  \nHowever, there is something else that I hold very dearly and allow me to share this. There \nis one further point, Madam Speaker, that the House cannot ignore. In Mauritius, as has been \nexpatiated and gone in detail by many of my colleagues before me, a certificate of character, \nor as it was known then, a certificat de moralité, is required for many employments in the \npublic sector. I have been on the website of the Ministry of Agro Industry; I have spoken to the \nMinister. You need a clean certificat de moralité, it says, if you want enn kart pêcheur. Yes, the \nwebsite says that. \nMadam Speaker: Tout dépend de ce qu'on comprend par pêcheur! \nMr Mohamed: Tout dépend de ce qu'on comprend par clean! \n(Interruptions) \nCan you imagine? What do you have to deal with? A certificate of character is required for a \nwide range of ordinary permits, licences, modest jobs, a hawker's card, permit marchand \nambulant, an employment, even planteur. Even planteur! I mean, I would understand for those \nwho were dabbling into the art of planting. But planteur, well, has nothing to do with what we \nwere used to during the last regime of planting. That has nothing to do with it.  \nNow, a general worker, a refuse collector, as was said by hon. Babajee –you said that \nwith avec raison – yet, allow me to say that the law as it stands today for us, in this Assembly, \ndoes not require a certificate of morality. No! So, even if we are to commit an offence, not even \nbefore, but even after, or whilst we are in this Assembly, and that offence has nothing to do \nwith electoral dishonesty; that itself has a time within which you can enter the matter and there \nis a limit, a statutory provided limit. We are the untouchables.  \nBut if it is money laundering, if it is rape, if it is anything of the sort, the law does not \nprovide that we can be disqualified while we are members of the House. So, the question, \ntherefore, has to be answered. I say it because it is an opportunity for us to show that we are \nhere for change, Madam Speaker. This is the mandate upon which we were brought to power \nand we have not forgotten that. Why is it that we are to forget something so obvious? How is \nit, therefore, that the man that has to toil away, sweat, be the hawker, be the planter, be the \nfisherman, he has higher standards to adhere to, whereas us, law makers, we have no standards! \nThere is a serious problem.  \nSo, I call therefore upon my colleague Ministers responsible for every single part there \nto look into this matter because it has to be sorted out. So, the most modest forms of work \ndemand the cleanest records, while the highest legislative office is governed by far more lenient \nstandard. That asymmetry is itself unfair. This Bill begins to correct it. So, from there, we have \nto build upon it. A man seeking to push a hawker's cart, take to sea as a fisherman, or sweep \nour streets, should not, Madam Speaker, face heavier lifelong consequences for entering an \nhonest trade than a politician faces for entering this Chamber. Fairness must begin where life \nis hardest, not where it is easiest.  \nThis is what I call change. That is what this Bill does. It preserves disclosure for serious \noffending. It removes unnecessary obstacles for lesser and dated convictions. It protects youth \noffenders. It forbids irrelevant discrimination in hiring and it brings a measure of justice to the \ncitizens who have, until now, carried the heaviest burden of the present law.  \nMadam Speaker, this Bill is fair in principle, careful in design and humane in effect. It is \nbalanced. It is overdue and it deserves the full support of this House. I commend the Certificate \nof Character Bill to the House. \nMadam Speaker: Thank you so much. You are all doing so well in terms of time.  \nYes, hon. Attorney General! I will again say it is time for your winding-up speech. \n(5.48 p.m.) \nThe Attorney General (Mr G. P. C. Glover, SC): Madam Speaker, last week, \nperchance, I learned of the story of a gentleman, now in his mid-40s and who works as an \naccountant in the private sector, but who has been plagued by a certificate of character \nexhibiting a conviction for a simple larceny for which he was fined.  \nThe offence was committed when he had just turned 18. Almost 30 years ago. With the \nadvent of this new legislation, this gentleman will now, after such a long time, be able to hold \nhis head high and apply for jobs he would never dream of going for, was it not for the novel \nprovisions of the Certificate of Character Bill.  \nMadam Speaker, this is the measure of the impact this law will have on the lives of \nhundreds, if not of thousands of Mauritians, cutting across generations, giving hope to people \nfrom all walks of life. That being said, Madam Speaker, I need to set the record straight. I do \nnot think that anyone has noticed it, but during my intervention two weeks ago, while setting \nout the conditions which will lead to certain convictions disappearing from a certificate of \ncharacter, I said that in cases where the prison sentence did not exceed five years, that \nconviction would disappear after 10 years. That was obviously incorrect as the Bill provides \nthat it is only in cases of a conviction which leads to a prison sentence of not more than three \nyears that will disappear after 10 years. Of course, this is subject to that offence not being listed \nin the First Schedule.  \nMadam Speaker, the importance of this law, this other piece of the jigsaw puzzle we have \nbeen putting together for the past 16 months, has been underscored by the number of Members \nof the House who have intervened. This House has heard from the Leader of the Opposition \nthat he supports the principle underlying the Bill, although he had qualms about the \nadministrative problems that he says would ensue. He spoke of the impracticability of the \nprocess presumably because the Bill does not depict exactly how the process will work.  \nLet me enlighten the House on this issue. You see, Madam Speaker, mindful of the fact \nthat we are innovating and increasing the workload of the Police and the Office of the DPP, the \nBill provides at clause 7 the answer. It provides in that clause that the Attorney General may \nmake regulations in consultation with the DPP to regulate applications for a certificate of \ncharacter and to provide for matters connected and incidental thereto. Not matters relevant \nthereto. \nIn relation thereto, a term which I use here advisedly, as will become apparent in a few \nminutes, I have to inform the House that I have had consultations with the Director of Public \nProsecutions and the Commissioner of Police, whom I met only yesterday, and we discussed \nthe setting up of a clear process for applications. Although it will not be possible to draw strict \ntimelines, we shall endeavour to make things happen in a transparent and effective manner. \nThe regulations to be made will reflect this.  \nAs things stand, Madam Speaker, an application for a certificate is either made online or \nin person, at the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, or at any of the divisional \nheadquarters of the Police. I am informed that there are on average around, hear this one, 9,000 \napplications monthly. \nMadam Speaker: Monthly? \nMr Glover: A third of those are made online and the rest in person. Assuming the \napplication is in order and the required documents submitted, there is a three-stage process \nwhich encompasses – \n(i) \na review at the divisional headquarters;  \n(ii) \na verification at the Crime Records Office of the Police, and finally  \n(iii) a full assessment at the Office of the DPP.  \nDelays may occur if applications are incomplete or contain inconsistent or insufficient \ninformation, or if a statement has to be taken by the Police from the applicant.  \nNow, for those who do not have a criminal record, I am told that the waiting time is \napproximately four to six weeks. For those who have criminal records, the process might take \nup to three months. However, we cannot and we should not close our eyes to the obvious surge \nof applications which will occur as soon as the law will come into force. And that is why we \nhave provided that the law will come into force upon proclamation, that is, at a time when the \nsystem will be ready to take on the increased load. So much for the administrative process.  \nThere are three other important issues, Madam Speaker, which must be addressed, lest \npeople will be left in the dark. First, with regard to what the Leader of the Opposition has \ndescribed as the structural ambiguity besetting Clause 4 of the Bill, ‘Non-discrimination in \nemployment’. He found fault with the terminology used in that, and so goes his argument, the \nwords related to the employment is open to debate and is not defined well enough.  \nBut that Clause 4, Madam Speaker, must be read in conjunction with Clause 12, which \ndeals with the consequential amendment to the Equal Opportunities Act. In the existing Equal \nOpportunities Act, Section 10(1)(f) provides that – \n“(1) No employer or prospective employer shall discriminate against another person –  \n(…) \n(f) \nwhere subject to subsection(2), that person has a criminal record which is \nirrelevant to the nature of employment for which that person is being \nconsidered.” \nSo, in the present Bill, we have moved from a test of relevance to the nature of \nemployment, which is to my mind subjective and rather wide, to one which is stricter. The \nwords being now used are “in relation to”, connoting a more objective test of connectivity. \nThat is why I meant earlier on when I said, “in relation to” was being used advisedly. Here, as \nin all laws, the balancing exercise is paramount. On the one hand, there is the need to afford \nadequate protection to the employee or prospective employee, and on the other, we cannot tie \nthe hands of the employer altogether.  \nAs I am on the Equal Opportunities Act, let me place on record that we are in presence \nof a paper from the Law Reform Commission, published late last year, entitled ‘Strengthening \nthe Powers of the Equal Opportunities Commission’. Thereafter, the Commission was \nrequested by the Prime Minister's Office to give its views on this paper, and it did just that in \nDecember last. These are being looked at and it will not be long before we come before the \nHouse with amendments to revamp the law in line with Paragraph 9 of the Government \nProgramme 2025-2029. The stated objective there, Madam Speaker, was and still is, and I \nquote – \n“To ensure the principles of meritocracy and non-discrimination in employment are \nupheld, Government will strengthen the powers of the Equal Opportunities \nCommission.”  \nThis Government, Madam Speaker, will thus honour another commitment it took and \nfulfil a promise it made to the people.  \nSecond, the Presidential Commission on the Prerogative of Mercy. The House has heard \nabout Section 75 of the Constitution. What ensued, unfortunately, can only be described as a \nméli-mélo, culminating with the First Member of Constituency No. 10, Montagne Blanche-\nGrand River South East, asking four questions which, if I may say so, are, unfortunately, based \non an infelicitous reading of Clause 5 of the Bill.  \nClause 5 of the Bill, which is entitled ‘Certificate of character with no criminal record’, \nprovides for circumstances which may lead to a clean certificate being issued by the DPP. One \nof the set of circumstances provided for concerns the case of someone who has been convicted \nof an offence but who has already obtained a free pardon by the President, acting on the advice \nof the Presidential Commission on the Prerogative of Mercy. That person will be issued with a \nclean Certificate of Character, irrespective of whether the conviction for which he obtained the \nfree pardon was one listed in the First Schedule. That is what the law says and nothing else – \nthat is Clause 5 (1) (b).  \nIn contradistinction, Clause 5(1) (c) of the Bill provides that the one who has been \nconvicted of an offence and given an absolute or conditional discharge will not have a clean \ncertificate if the offence is one which is listed in the First Schedule. There resides the difference.  \nTo go back to the questions put by the hon. Member, with due respect, they are irrelevant, \nbeing premised on an erroneous understanding of what Clause 5 (1) (b) of the Bill provides. \nMadam Speaker: C'est compliqué! \nMr Glover: Third, Madam Speaker… \nMadam Speaker: Monsieur le ministre, c'est un peu compliqué pour les non-juristes, \nhonnêtement ! \nMr Glover: I am talking of the First Member for Constituency No. 10. \nMadam Speaker: Yes, yes. \nMr Glover: Third, Madam Speaker, previous convictions. The Police is the authority \nwhich, through its Criminal Records Office, gathers and stores data relating to previous \nconvictions. The question raised is: what effect will the provisions of this Bill ultimately have \non the criminal record of an individual? The short answer is, none. Why? Because precisely \nthe operation of the provisions of this Bill is not akin to a free pardon, which is when your \nconviction is erased from the criminal record system, as if you have never committed any \ncrime.  \nThe Certificate of Character is an administrative document which is issued according to \nthe provisions of the law for non-judicial use. You cannot use same in a court of law. If \nsomeone has a clean certificate by operation of the provisions of this Bill, the conviction and \nsentence concerned will no longer appear on the Certificate of Character. But should he, for \nexample, commit another offence, the court will have to look at any of his previous convictions, \nincluding the one which no longer appears on the certificate, because it will still appear on the \ncriminal record at the Police.  \nMadam Speaker, I hope I have cleared the air for all, especially for those who supported \nthe Bill in principle and agreed that it was a step in the right direction, but who, nonetheless, \nfell short of commending the Bill. In sharp contradiction with the First Member of Constituency \nNo. 10, who candidly commended the Bill to the House.  \nWith these words, Madam Speaker, I commend the Bill to the House. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nBill read a second time and committed.  \nCOMMITTEE STAGE \nTHE CERTIFICATE OF CHARACTER BILL \n(NO. II OF 2026) \n(Madam Speaker in the Chair) \nClauses 1 to 14 ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nFirst Schedule  \nMotion made and question proposed; “that the First Schedule stand part of the Bill.” \nMr Glover: Madam Chairperson, I move for the following amendments the First \nSchedule – \n“In the First Schedule – \n(a) \nin item 6, in the third column –  \n(i) \nby deleting the following sections and their corresponding entries –  \n301  Larceny \n330B  Issuing cheque without provision \nHindering public works by force \n(ii) \nby inserting, in the appropriate numerical order, the following new \nsections and their corresponding entries –  \nOffences by public officers \nHaving offensive weapon at unlawful assembly \n230(2) Assault – premeditation or lying in wait \nAssault upon father or mother \nGiving false evidence in case of misdemeanour \nDeceiving purchaser \nDamaging property by band \nPoisoning animal \n(b) \nin item 15, in the third column, by deleting the following section and its \ncorresponding entry –  \nInternational terrorism”. \nAmendment agreed to.  \nFirst Schedule, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nSecond Schedule ordered to stand part of the Bill.  \nThird Schedule ordered to stand part of the Bill \nThe title and enacting clause ordered to stand part of the Bill. \nThe Bill, as amended, was agreed to. \nOn the Assembly resuming with Madam Speaker in the Chair, Madam Speaker reported \naccordingly \nThird Reading \nOn motion made and seconded, the Certificate of Character Bill (No. II of 2026) was \nread a third time and passed. \nADJOURNMENT  \nThe Prime Minister: Madam Speaker, I beg to move that this Assembly do now adjourn \nto Tuesday 12 May 2026 at 11:30 a.m. \nDr. Boolell rose and seconded. \nQuestion put and agreed to. \nMadam Speaker: The House stands adjourned! It is Tuesday next.  \nAt 6.04 p.m., the Assembly was, on its rising, adjourned to Tuesday 12 May 2026 at \n11:30 a.m. \nWRITTEN ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS \nFREEDOM OF INFORMATION BILL –  PROPOSED INTRODUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/596",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 596,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/596) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to water supply, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as \nto whether it is in presence of complaints to the effect that same is muddy or murky and, if so, \nindicate the – \n(a) \nreasons therefor, and  \n(b) \nremedial measures being taken in relation thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nM4 MOTORWAY – RIVIÈRE DU REMPART-FLACQ-GRAND PORT– \nBENEFITS, IMPACT ASSESSMENTS & REASONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/597",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 597,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floreal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/597) Ms J. Bérenger (First Member for Vacoas & Floréal) asked the Minister \nof National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the M4 Motorway linking the Rivière du \nRempart District to the Grand Port District via the Flacq District Project, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain from the Road Development Authority, information as to – \n(a) \nthe main beneficiaries thereof;  \n(b) \nwhether prior economic, social and financial impact assessments thereof were \ncarried out and, if so, indicate the main findings thereof, and  \n(c) \nthe reasons for the prioritisation thereof over other urgent road works in villages \nand localities facing severe daily traffic congestion.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nBANCO VALOR INTERNATIONAL LTD – INVESTMENT BANKING \nLICENCE – DUE DILIGENCE EXERCISE – OUTCOME",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/598",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 598,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Financial Services and Economic Planning",
      "question": "(No. B/598) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked the \nMinister of Financial Services and Economic Planning whether, in regard to the Investment \nBanking Licence granted to Banco Valor International Ltd., beneficially owned by Mr A. S., \nshe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Financial Services Commission, \ninformation as to the outcome of the due diligence exercise carried out when the application \ntherefor was processed, indicating – \n(a) \nwhether the Board thereof was informed of any red flag concerning Mr A. S. and, \nif not, whether it was subsequently informed thereof, and  \n(b) \nthe actions, if any, taken in respect of the officers involved in the processing \nthereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nTRUST FUND FOR EXCELLENCE IN SPORTS – CHAIRPERSON’S \nREVOCATION – OVERSIGHT & GOVERNANCE CONCERNS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/599",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 599,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/599) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the revocation of Mr N. V. as \nChairperson of the Trust Fund for Excellence in Sports, he will state – \n(a) \nthe reasons therefor, indicating whether an inquiry was conducted prior thereto, \nand  \n(b) \nwhether – \n(i) \nhe has taken cognizance of allegations of irregularities thereat and of \ninterference by the Chief Executive Officer thereof in the management of the \nFund made by Mr N.V., and  \n(ii) \nthe governance structure and operation of the Fund will be reviewed.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIUS METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES-MET OFFICE – GRANT \nFUND AGREEMENT – OBJECTIVES & BENEFITS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/600",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 600,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/600) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nLocal Government whether, in regard to the Grant Fund Agreement signed between the \nMauritius Meteorological Services and the Met Office, United Kingdom, under the Weather \nand Climate Information Services for Africa Initiative, he will, for the benefit of the House, \nobtain information as to the objectives and expected benefits thereof, indicating, in particular, \nhow same is expected to enhance the weather and climate forecasting capacity across the \nRepublic of Mauritius and support national preparedness for extreme events.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nDOMESTIC VIOLENCE – PROTECTION ORDERS – BREACHES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/601",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 601,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Jugurnauth)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "B/601\nThe Honourable Second Member for Savanne and Black River  \n(Mr Jugurnauth) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Local Government – \n \nWhether, in regard to the bare land situated at Martinière \nRoad, in Surinam, used as a dumping ground, he will state \nwhether officers of his Ministry have recently effected a site \nvisit thereat to ascertain the state thereof and, if so, indicate \nthe findings thereof and the measures being envisaged in \nrelation thereto?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": "NOT ANSWERED",
      "deferred_to": [
        "tuesday-07-april-2026"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B/602",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 602,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/602) Dr F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to \nProtection Orders in cases of domestic violence, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to the number thereof issued over the past three years, on a yearly basis, \nindicating the – \n(a) \nauthority responsible for the monitoring of adherence thereto;  \n(b)  number of reported cases of serious breaches thereof, and  \n(c)  measures being envisaged to prevent the recurrence of domestic violence following \nthe issue thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFISHERMAN REGISTRATION CARD – CHARACTER CERTIFICATE – \nREQUIREMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/603",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 603,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "B/603\nThe Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River  \n(Mr Babajee) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, \nBlue Economy and Fisheries – \n \nWhether, in regard to the fishers operating at Riambel and \nSurinam, he will state whether he is in presence of \nrepresentations \ntherefrom \nto \nthe \neffect \nthat \nthe \nimplementation of a property development project along the \nRiambel beach is hindering their fishing activities and \nblocking their passage and, if so, indicate the actions, if any, \ntaken by his Ministry in relation thereto? \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                     PAGE 15 of 24 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/604",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 604,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "B/604\nThe Honourable Second Member for Grand' Baie and Poudre D'or \n(Mr Beejan) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness – \n \nWhether, in regard to the E-Health Project, he will, for the \nbenefit of the House, obtain information as to the official \norganisational framework of the Digital Health Company Ltd., \nresponsible for the implementation thereof, indicating the \ncomposition of the personnel thereof and where matters \nstand regarding the recruitment exercise it was carrying out \nfor permanent staff and expected full operationalisation \nthereof and the rollout of the “One Patient, One Record” \nSystem?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/605",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 605,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River (Mr Babajee)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "B/605\nThe Honourable First Member for Savanne and Black River  \n(Mr Babajee) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Energy and Public Utilities – \n \nWhether, in regard to an alleged wastewater leakage at \nAvenue Independence, in Bambous, he will, for the benefit of \nthe House, obtain from the Waste Water Management \nAuthority, information as to whether a site visit has been \neffected thereat and the outcome thereof and, if so, indicate \nwhether (a) remedial measures have been taken and  \n(a) a health risk assessment has been carried out in relation \nthereto?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/606",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 606,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/606) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in \nregard to the Fisherman Registration Card, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation as to whether it is a prerequisite for the applicants to hold a clean Certificate of \nCharacter for eligibility thereto.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nDRUG ADDICTION – ADOLESCENTS – HEALTH ISSUES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/607",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 607,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/607) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) asked \nthe Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to drug related health conditions, he \nwill state the number of adolescents admitted in public health institutions therefor over the past \nfive years on a yearly basis, indicating if an assessment of the drug-addiction level of \nadolescents in Mauritius has been carried out and, if so, indicate the measures being \nimplemented or envisaged to address same.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nCONSTITUENCY NO. 10, MONTAGNE BLANCHE & GRSE – SPORT \nCOMPLEX – CONSTRUCTION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/608",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 608,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Dr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Youth and Sports",
      "question": "(No. B/608) Dr. R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Youth and Sports whether, in regard to the provision of sports \ninfrastructure in Constituency No. 10, Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East, he will, \nfor the benefit of the House, obtain from the Mauritius Sports Council, information as to \nwhether consideration will be given for the – \n(a) \nconstruction of a modern and fully-equipped sports complex thereat in accordance \nwith international standards, and  \n(b)  opening, as an interim measure, of the gymnasium at the SSS Bel Air to the public, \nincluding the provision of qualified coaching facilities, free of charge, during \nweekends and after school hours.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nCONSTITUENCY NO.18, BELLE ROSE & QUATRE BORNES – \nCONSTRUCTION OF DRAINS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/609",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 609,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/609) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to the construction of drains in \nConstituency No.18, Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Land Drainage Authority, information as to where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMRS A. R’S SON – MEDICAL TREATMENT IN INDIA – FINANCIAL \nASSISTANCE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/610",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 610,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Dr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/610) Dr. R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) \nasked the Minister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the medical treatment \nundertaken by the son of Mrs A. R., in India, under the aegis of his Ministry, he will – \n (a) for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Overseas Treatment Unit, information \nas to the nature and extent of the financial and logistical assistance provided \nthereto, and  \n(b)  state if his Ministry is in presence of any complaints made in relation thereto and, \nif so, indicate the measures, if any, taken to address same.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nALA-LILA ONLINE PLATFORM – TAXI OPERATORS – \nREPRESENTATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/611",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 611,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/611) Mr F. Quirin (Third Member for Beau Bassin & Petite Rivière) asked \nthe Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the introduction of the Ala-lila online \nplatform powered by Uber in Mauritius, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nNational Land Transport Authority, information as to whether – \n (a) it is in presence of representations from some taxis operators regarding same, and  \n(b) \nthe approval of the Authority was sought and obtained prior thereto and, if so, \nindicate the conditions attached thereto and, if not, indicate the actions that will be \ntaken in relation thereto, if any.",
      "answer": "CEB AGRIVOLTAICS SCHEME – IMPLEMENTATION – SUCCESS RATE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/612",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 612,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Rodrigues (Ms Collet)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/612) Ms M. R. Collet (First Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nEnergy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the implementation of the CEB Agrivoltaics \nScheme, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Electricity Board, \ninformation as to where matters stand, indicating the – \n(a) \nsuccess rate thereof as at to date, and \n(b) \nnumber of applications received since the implementation of the initial phase \nthereof in 2024, indicating the number thereof having been processed, approved \nand pending as at to date.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nAFRICAN UNION – EXPORT MARKET DIVERSIFICATION – TRADE \nENHANCEMENT POLICY",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/613",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 613,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Grand Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Etwareea)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade",
      "question": "(No. B/613) Mr R. Etwareea (Third Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or) asked \nthe Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade whether, in regard \nto Government's policy to enhance trade with member countries of the African Union with a \nview to diversifying our export markets, he will state the trade missions effected in connection \ntherewith since the implementation thereof to 20 April 2026, indicating, in each case, the actual \nand foreseen outcomes thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nFLEET MANAGEMENT SYSTEM – PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION – \nSTATUS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/614",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 614,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Vieux Grand Port and Rose Belle (Mr Ramdass)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/614) Mr A. Ramdass (Third Member for Vieux Grand Port & Rose Belle) \nasked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the proposed implementation of the \nFleet Management System, he will state where matters stand.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nLATE RAS NATTY BABY – MEDICAL TREATMENT IN INDIA – TOTAL \nEXPENDITURE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/615",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 615,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Flacq and Bon Accueil (Mr Beechook)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/615) Mr R. Beechook (Second Member for Flacq & Bon Accueil) asked the \nMinister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to late Mr J. N. É. also known as Ras Natty \nBaby, he will state the circumstances under which he was transferred for medical treatment in \nIndia, indicating the total expenditure incurred in respect thereof and for the repatriation of his \nbody to Mauritius.",
      "answer": "(Vide Reply to PQ B/579) \nELECTRIC BUSES – DEPLOYMENT – CHARGING STATIONS \n\n113",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/616",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 616,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Piton and Rivière du Rempart (Dr Prayag)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/616) Dr. S. Prayag (First Member for Piton & Rivière du Rempart) asked the \nMinister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the fleet of 100 electric buses donated by the \nGovernment of India, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the National Transport \nCorporation, information as to the deployment thereof across the various depots, indicating the \n– \n(a) \ntimeframe set therefor and for the full operationalisation thereof, and \n(b) \nnumber of charging stations or pods installed therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nRODRIGUES & MAURITIUS – MEDICAL SOCIAL WORKERS – SCHEME \nOF DUTIES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/617",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 617,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/617) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nHealth and Wellness whether, in regard to Medical Social Workers, he will state the – \n(a) \nnumber thereof posted in public hospitals in mainland Mauritius and Rodrigues \nIsland, respectively, and \n(b) \n scheme of duties thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMAURITIUS & RODRIGUES – USE OF PESTICIDES – CONTROL MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/618",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 618,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Fourth Member for Rodrigues (Mr Edouard)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries",
      "question": "(No. B/618) Mr J. Edouard (Fourth Member for Rodrigues) asked the Minister of \nAgro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries whether, in regard to the use of \npesticides in agriculture in mainland Mauritius and Rodrigues Island, he will state the – \n(a) \nnorms applicable thereto, and \n(b) \ncontrol measures in place to prevent contamination in the chain of agricultural \nproducts.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMINISTRY OF LAND TRANSPORT – APPEAL COMMITTEE – PENDING \nAPPEALS – MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/619",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 619,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles and Souillac (Dr Ms Daureeawo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Land Transport",
      "question": "(No. B/619) Dr. Ms R. Daureeawo (Third Member for Rivière des Anguilles & \nSouillac) asked the Minister of Land Transport whether, in regard to the Appeal Committee of \nhis Ministry, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the number and type \nof appeals pending before the Board thereof over the past two years, indicating the – \n(a) timeframe set for the consideration thereof, and \n(b) measures being envisaged to address the delays in determining the appeals.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nMONTAGNE BLANCHE – CREMATORIUM PROJECT – COMPLETION \nDATE – TIMELY OPERATIONALISATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/620",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 620,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Vacoas and Floreal (Ms Joanna Bérenger)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Arts and Culture",
      "question": "B/620\nThe \nHonourable \nFirst \nMember \nfor \nVacoas \nand \nFloreal  \n(Ms Joanna Bérenger) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Arts and Culture – \n \nWhether, in regard to the claims for arrears of late Mr J. N. É., \nalso known as Ras Natty Baby, from the Provident & \nBenevolent Fund of the Mauritius Society of Authors (MASA), \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the MASA, a \nbreakdown of the costs incurred in terms of legal and \nconsultancy fees since 2022 to date, indicating (a) the names \nof the said professionals/firms and (b) value of the final \nsettlement reached and when same was disbursed?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/621",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 621,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière (Mr Quirin)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "B/621\nThe Honourable Third Member for Beau Bassin and Petite Rivière \n(Mr Quirin) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of National Infrastructure – \n \nWhether, in regard to the ongoing works along Royal Road, \nBeau-Bassin, from Supermarket Tang Way up to Mosquée \nStreet, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the \nRoad Development Authority, information as to the (a) scope \nand nature thereof (b) start and expected completion dates \nthereof (c) name of the contractor therefor and (d) project \ncost thereof, indicating the consultancy and/or supervision \nfees, if any, payable in relation thereto? \n \n \n \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                     PAGE 20 of 24 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/622",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 622,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Dr Saumtally)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Local Government",
      "question": "(No. B/622) Dr. R. Saumtally (Third Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) asked \nthe Minister of Local Government whether, in regard to the implementation of the crematorium \nproject at Montagne Blanche, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to \nwhere matters stand, indicating the – \n(a) \nexpected completion date thereof, and \n(b) \nmeasures being envisaged to ensure the timely operationalisation thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \n \nINVALIDITY PENSIONS – BENEFICIARIES – REJECTED APPLICATIONS",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/623",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 623,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis South and Port Louis Central (Dr Aumeer)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity",
      "question": "(No. B/623) Dr. F. Aumeer (Third Member for Port Louis South & Port Louis \nCentral) asked the Minister of Social Integration, Social Security and National Solidarity \nwhether, in regard to the Invalidity Pensions, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \ninformation, since January 2024 to date on a yearly basis, information as to – \n(a) \nthe number of beneficiaries thereof, indicating the number thereof whose \npensions have been stopped, and \n(b) \nwhether applications therefor from persons suffering from long-term chronic \ndiseases, acquired long-term disabilities and inborn disorders have been rejected \nand, if so, indicate the number thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nELECTRICITY TARIFF INCREASE – HOUSEHOLDS & SMALL \nBUSINESSES IMPACT – MITIGATING MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/624",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 624,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable First Member for Montagne Blanche and Grand River South East (Mr Baboolall)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. B/624) Mr C. Baboolall (First Member for Montagne Blanche & GRSE) asked \nthe Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the announced 15 percent \nincrease in electricity tariffs as from May 2026, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain \nfrom the Central Electricity Board, information as to – \n(a) \nwhether the impact thereof on households and small businesses has been assessed, \nindicating the mitigating measures being envisaged regarding vulnerable \nconsumers, and \n(b) \nthe number of households having had their electricity supply disconnected over the \npast year for non-payment of bills.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nGOODLANDS – PEAK HOURS TRAFFIC – DECONGESTION MEASURES",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/625",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 625,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Grand Baie and Poudre D'or (Mr Beejan)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of National Infrastructure",
      "question": "(No. B/625) Mr N. Beejan (Second Member for Grand’ Baie & Poudre d'Or)  asked \nthe Minister of National Infrastructure whether, in regard to heavy traffic congestion occurring \nalong the By-Pass from the Goodlands Roundabout to the level of Espace Maison/Rouillard \nRoundabout during peak hours between 07 00 a.m. to 09 00 a.m. and between 3 30 p.m to 7 00 \np.m., he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Road Development Authority, \ninformation as to whether consideration will be given for the construction of – \n(a) \nan additional lane along same, and \n(b) \na separate stretch of road at the appropriate roundabout for commuters \nconverging towards the Vale and Petit Raffray.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSHELTER CAP L’ESPOIR – ACTING SHELTER MANAGER – DUTIES & \nQUALIFICATION",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/626",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 626,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Belle Rose and Quatre Bornes (Ms Anquetil)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare",
      "question": "(No. B/626) Ms S. Anquetil (Second Member for Belle Rose & Quatre Bornes) \nasked the Minister of Gender Equality and Family Welfare whether, in regard to the Shelter \nCap L’Espoir, she will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to the identity of the \ncurrent Acting Shelter Manager, indicating the scheme of duties thereof and qualification \nrequirements therefor.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nSUPERMARKETS LEVYING CHARGES – REMISES DE FIN D’ANNÉE & \nMARKETING FEES – IMPACT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/627",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 627,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection",
      "question": "(No. B/627) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked \nthe Minister of Commerce and Consumer Protection whether, in regard to the practice of \nsupermarkets levying charges, including ‘remises de fin d’année’ and marketing fees on their \nsuppliers, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain information as to whether the impact \nthereof on retail prices and consumer purchasing power has been assessed and, if so, indicate \nthe findings thereof.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nPUBLIC SERVICE – MEDICAL & HEALTH PROFESSIONALS – EFFICIENCY & \nACCOUNTABILITY ENHANCEMENT",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/628",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 628,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Pamplemousses and Triolet (Mr Rookny)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "(No. B/628) Mr K. Rookny (Third Member for Pamplemousses & Triolet) asked the \nMinister of Health and Wellness whether, in regard to the recruitment, retention and discipline \nof medical and health professionals in the public service, he will – \n(a) \ngive details of the existing arrangements governing same, and \n(b) \nstate whether consideration is being given for the setting up of a dedicated \nMedical and Health Services Commission on the lines of existing service \ncommissions with a view to strengthening efficiency, governance and \naccountability therein.",
      "answer": "(Withdrawn) \nWATER RESERVOIRS – DREDGING & MAINTENANCE WORKS & LA FERME \nRESERVOIR IRRIGATION USE",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "B/629",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "B",
      "number": 629,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne Longue (Mr Caserne)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Health and Wellness",
      "question": "B/629\nThe Honourable Third Member for Port Louis North and Montagne \nLongue (Mr Caserne) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Health and Wellness – \n \nWhether, in regard to the 24/7 specialised medical services in \nthe field of Paediatric, Gynaecology, and Anaesthesia, he will \nstate if a review thereof is being envisaged, following the \nrecent award of the Employment Relations Tribunal and, if so, \ngive details thereof? \n \n \n \n \nBibi Safeena Lotun, C.S.K. (Mrs)                                          \n Clerk of the National Assembly \n \nParliament House \nPort Louis  \n \n30 April 2026 \n \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                     PAGE 23 of 24 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org \n \n \nMAURITIUS NATIONAL ASSEMBLY \nQuestions of which notice has been given \nNot Requiring an Oral Answer \nSitting of Tuesday 05 May 2026 \n \n \nQuestions addressed to Honourable Ministers, other than to   \nDr the Honourable Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs \nand External Communications, Minister of Finance, Minister for \nRodrigues and Outer Islands",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/30",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 30,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "A/30\nThe Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka \n(Dr Ms Thannoo) \n \nTo ask the Honourable Minister of Energy and Public Utilities – \n \nWhether, in regard to the implementation of a desalination \nplant project in the north of Mauritius, he will, for the benefit \nof the House, obtain information as to (a) whether an EIA \nlicence has been secured therefor (b) the provisions made in \nrespect of the high energy consumption rate thereof, \nestimated at more than 1.5 million kWh per day (c) the \nidentified operational costs per day thereof and the long-term \nfinancing strategy therefor and (d) the plans established for \nthe safe disposal of the desalination brine therefrom?",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/31",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 31,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Education and Human Resource",
      "question": "A/31\nThe Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka \n(Dr Ms Thannoo) \n \nTo ask Dr the Honourable Minister of Education and Human \nResource – \n \nWhether, in regard to the Kreol Morisien, he will state \nwhether students having opted therefor as an A-level subject \nsince January 2025 are being denied the possibility of sitting \ntherefor at the level of the Cambridge International \nExaminations and if so, indicate the measures being taken or \nenvisaged by his Ministry to ensure the recognition thereof by \nthe Cambridge International Centre, and enable the said \nstudents to sit for the examinations? \n \n\nPARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS                                     PAGE 24 of 24 \n \nParliament House, Port Louis, Mauritius:  Tel (230) 201-1414/Fax (230) 212-8364 \n  Email: clerk@govmu.org    Web site: http://mauritiusassembly.govmu.org",
      "answer": "",
      "status": "NOT_ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": true,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/32",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 32,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. A/32) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the water reservoirs, he \nwill, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Central Water Authority, information as to – \n(a) \nthe frequency at which dredging and maintenance works to improve the storage \ncapacity thereof are undertaken and table information as to the number of times \nsame have been undertaken since 2015 to date, and  \n(b) \nwhy La Ferme Water Reservoir is reserved for irrigation purposes only.",
      "answer": "Reply: With regard to part (a) of the question, I am informed by the Water Resources \nCommission that dredging to existing impounding reservoirs already in operation is not carried \nout for technical reasons and taking due consideration of the uncertainties related to the non-\nhomogeneous geological condition in Mauritius.  \nI am further advised that dredging will disturb the reservoir bed, which has consolidated \nover the years with the flow of silt during floods. It can also induce seepage of water under the \ndam foundation which in turn can endanger the stability and safety of the embankment \nstructure. The safest method to increase the storage capacity of a reservoir is through raising \nof the dam embankment. \nIn the event desilting of reservoir bed has to be undertaken, it should be carried out in the \ncontext of a complete rehabilitation/raising of dam project. In this case, the reservoir is \ncompletely emptied and additional engineering measures, for example, construction of cut-off \nwall, are implemented to secure the dam embankment. \nHowever, as for maintenance works around the major reservoirs, these are carried out \nregularly. \nRegarding part (b) of the question, I am informed that La Ferme Reservoir, located near \nthe village of Bambous, has been constructed around the year 1914, across River Belle Isle and \nis primarily used for irrigation to support agriculture in the western coast. The reservoir has a \nstorage capacity of 11.52 million m3. Historically, it serves the Black River District, supplying \nwater for sugar cane and other crops, while also functioning as a key storage facility for \nagricultural, rather than domestic consumption. \nThe Ministry has appointed consultants to review the La Ferme Dam structure and to \npropose measures to rehabilitate and enhance its structural integrity while at the same time, \nincrease its storage capacity. Bidding documents have been prepared for the rehabilitation \nworks which includes raising of the dam to increase the storage capacity to 14.0 million m3. \nIt is envisaged to use the water for potable purposes once the infrastructure works are \ncompleted. Studies are ongoing on this aspect, given that a new water treatment plant would \nneed to be constructed in due course. \nALMA, L’ESPÉRANCE, L’AVENIR, RIPAILLES & NOUVELLE \nDÉCOUVERTE – WATER SUPPLY ISSUES – SURVEY OF UNUSED BOREHOLES \n& WELLS – DECENTRALISATION PLAN",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    },
    {
      "id": "A/33",
      "sitting_id": "tuesday-05-may-2026",
      "date": "2026-05-05",
      "year": 2026,
      "day_of_week": "Tuesday",
      "series": "A",
      "number": 33,
      "asked_by": "The Honourable Second Member for Quartier Militaire and Moka (Dr Ms Thannoo)",
      "addressed_to": "Minister of Energy and Public Utilities",
      "question": "(No. A/33) Dr. Ms B. Thannoo (Second Member for Quartier Militaire & Moka) \nasked the Minister of Energy and Public Utilities whether, in regard to the regular water supply \nissues being encountered in Alma, L’Espérance, L’Avenir, Ripailles and Nouvelle Découverte, \nhe will, for the benefit of the House, obtain  information as to  whether consideration will be \ngiven for a survey of the currently unused boreholes and wells thereat to be undertaken by the \nWater Resources Unit, in collaboration with the Geotechnical Engineering Division of the \nMinistry of National Infrastructure, with a view to assessing the viability thereof and \nestablishing a decentralisation plan for the optimal use of local water sources.",
      "answer": "Reply: I am informed that 24 boreholes have been drilled in the regions of Alma, \nL’Esperance, L’Avenir, Ripailles and Nouvelle Découverte. The Central Water Authority is \nalready exploiting six boreholes for domestic water supply in Beau Bois, Bonne Veine, \nMalenga and Alma (nearer to Dagotière). \nAnother six boreholes are being used for agricultural purposes while 12 boreholes are \nnot in use due to low and insufficient yield which do not make them viable for exploitation by \nCWA. \nIt is to be noted that the Water Resources Commission has awarded a contract for the \ndrilling of another borehole at Alma in the coming months. Furthermore, for the Financial Year \n2026/ 2027, it is planned to drill one borehole at L’Espérance – Quartier Militaire. \nThe location of the proposed boreholes is identified using competency in hydrogeology \navailable in house at the Water Resources Commission. For the geophysical survey exercise, \nwhich is the required investigation techniques for borehole drilling, same would be outsourced \nto a specialised firm.",
      "status": "ANSWERED",
      "is_missing": false,
      "cross_debate_answered": null,
      "deferred_to": []
    }
  ]
}